Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CCPC Agenda 04/02/2026 (1 pm)
COLLIER COUNTY Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 2, 2026 1:00 PM Joseph Schmitt, Environmental - Chairman Chuck Schumacher - Vice -Chair Paul Shea, Environmental - Secretary Randy Sparrazza Charles (Chap) Colucci Michelle L. McLeod Mike Petscher Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes S.A. March 5, 2026, CCPC Meeting Minutes (2026-807) 6. BCC Report - Recaps Page 1 of 745 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Advertised Public Hearing 9.A. PL20250006066 - Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict (GMPA) — An ordinance of the board of county commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Future Land Use Map and map series by changing the land use designation of property from Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street Residential Subdistrict to allow 36 multifamily townhouse dwelling units, with affordable housing. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW, east of I-75 in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of f4.18 acres; furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Kathryn Grigsby, Planner III) [Companion item to RPUD-PL202500060681 (2026-533) 9.13. PL20250006068-Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD - The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider rezoning ±4.18 acres from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD to allow up to 36 townhouse dwelling units with Affordable Housing. The subject property, consisting of ±4.18 acres, is located partially within the Corridor Management Overlay and within the Airport Overlay on the south side of 62nd Street S.W. and Golden Gate Parkway, and on the west side of 60th Street S.W., east of I-75, in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III] (Companion item to GMPA- PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA) (2026-575) 9.C. PL202060002040 - EX - 3959 City Gate Blvd N - Collier County requests approval from the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Environmental Advisory Council, of a commercial excavation permit, for property located in the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development at 3959 City Gate Blvd N in Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (PL20260002040) [Coordinator: Jaime Cook, Director, Development Review Division] (2026-773) 9.D. PL20250009053 - Copperstone Estates RPUD -Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agriculture (A) to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district known as Copperstone Estates RPUD to allow up to 12 residential dwelling units on 4.04± acres of property located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III, GMCDD, Zoning Division] (2026-577) Page 2 of 745 10. Old Business 11. New Business 12. Public Comments 13. Adjourn Page 3 of 745 March 5, 2026, CCPC Meeting Minutes ATTACHMENTS: March 5, 2026, CCPC Meeting Minutes 4/2/2026 Item # 5.A ID# 2026-807 Page 4 of 745 March 5, 2026 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida March 5, 2026 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Joe Schmitt, Chairman Chuck Schumacher, Vice Chairman Paul Shea, Secretary Randy Sparrazza Michael Petscher Michelle L. McLeod Charles "Chap" Colucci Amy Lockhart, Collier County School Board Representative ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Courtney DeSilva, County Attorney's Office Ailyn Padron, Management Analyst I Eric Johnson, LDC Manager Page 1 of 37 Page 5 of 745 March 5, 2026 PROCEEDINGS MR. BOSI: Chair, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Thank you. And good morning. Welcome to the March 5th, 2029 [sic], Collier County Planning Commission. And I ask that we stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And please, Commissioner Shea, if you could take the roll. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Chairman Schmitt? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Vice Chair Schumacher? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Secretary Shea is here. Commissioner Sparrazza? COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Colucci? COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner McLeod? COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Petscher? COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Ms. Lockhart? MS. LOCKHART: Here. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Sir, we have a quorum. We are all present. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Excellent. Ray, any addenda to the agenda? MR. BELLOWS: I have no changes. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: No changes, okay. Please note our next meeting is scheduled for March 19th, 2026. Are there any commissioners projected to be absent? I will be absent, so Chuck is going to have to chair that one. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: I will also be absent. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. So that's two. Anybody else? Well, we'll have a quorum. Mike, what's that agenda look like? If I recall, it's a Rural Lands Stewardship amendment. MR. BOSI: Four petitions. Yeah, four petitions -- I'm sorry. Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. Four petitions. A mine CU, rezone that's pretty mild, Moorings Park at Grande PUDA, as well as another -- and the Corkscrew Grove East SRA. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Oh, so we saved them all for Chuck. That's good. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Great. Spectacular. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The March meeting, then, could you advise us on that meeting. I'll be here for that. But go ahead. MR. BOSI: For March -- I mean, for March 19th, it's the next meeting. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: But then there's a -- one after that, you said. Page 2 of 37 Page 6 of 745 March 5, 2026 MR. BOSI: The one after that is April 2nd. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: April 2nd. Thank you. MR. BOSI: Then note, there's a specific change. We're not -- because we have an LDC amendment for a night hearing, it's a relatively quick one -- I don't think it's going to be more than 15, 20 minutes -- it's adding the comparable -use determination process to the industrial category. It's in the industrial zoning district. It's the only zoning district that doesn't have that language, so we are adding that -- we're proposing to add that back to the LDC. That meeting will start at 1 o'clock. Because we have three petitions prior to the 5:05 start time, so we'll have -- I o'clock should be -- allow us -- give us plenty of time to get through the three petitions, and then we'll have the 5:05 meeting on the 2nd. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Does anybody think they're going to be absent for that meeting? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So we should have a quorum. All right, good. Okay. Next item on the agenda -- let me pop that up. It's approval of minutes, scheduled -- minutes from March [sic] 19th, 2026. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Do I hear a motion to approve? Motion to approve. And do I hear a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All in favor, say aye. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Aye. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Any opposed, like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. Ray, BCC report. MR. BELLOWS: Yes, during the last Board of County Commissioner meeting is that working? It doesn't sound like it. Anyways, at the last Board of County Commissioner meeting, there was a conditional use and a variance for the Immokalee sand mine. That was approved on the summary agenda. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Next item, Chairman's report. I have nothing. Nothing on the consent agenda. ***So our next item is the first petition. That's Imperial Lakes PUD amendment. That's the -- it's on the future expansion of the Veterans Memorial Boulevard. This is an ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, amending -- Ordinance 2004-41, amending the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification for the Planned Unit Development and the Special Treatment Overlay for this development. Page 3 of 37 Page 7 of 745 March 5, 2026 Note: This is already an approved PUD, and we're here simply -- it's an amendment to the PUD to add some alternatives. I won't go through that; Mr. Yovanovich can. But before we proceed, I would ask if we have any disclosures. Amy? MS. LOCKHART: Yes. I have -- I have met with the applicant and spoken to the applicant's representatives in the past about this project. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: I spoke with Mr. Yovanovich. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. I spoke with Mr. Yovanovich, but I want to put on the record that in 2014 I -- the company I was associated with, Dawson & Associates, I was serving as senior consultant, and we did some preliminary reviews of the biological assessment and biological opinion for this. It had nothing to do with the zoning. The zoning already existed. So in 2014 we provided -- the owner of the property was one of the Gulf Bay associates -- of options for proceeding with the 404 permit, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. And in 2016, Tim Hall and I did walk the property. So I did a site visit, but it was strictly as a review of the existing 2014 biological assessment. That contract was terminated in 2019. I had -- like I said, it had nothing to do with the zoning. It was strictly just an advisory role on how to proceed with an already approved permit, but that's all been circum -- all been replaced by a new proposal with Tim Hall, and I've had nothing since then. So I just want to put that on the record. And I did speak to Mr. Yovanovich about this petition. So, Chuck. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Staff materials only. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Staff materials and a conversation with Mr. Yovanovich. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Staff materials only. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Staff materials, spoke with Mike Bosi, spoke with Rich Yovanovich, couldn't get to the site but drove all the way around the site. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's a good thing you didn't go on the site. It's pretty thick out there. I could tell a little story about Tim, but we don't want to bring that up on the record. Anyways, please rise if -- anybody that wishes to speak on this matter. THE COURT REPORTER: Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Rich. MR. YOVANOVICH: Good morning. For the record, Rich Yovanovich on behalf of the applicant. N.A. Realty Trust, Inc., is the owner and the property and the applicant, and Joe Parisi is the representative of that company. Wayne Arnold is our professional planner, and he is here to answer any planning -related questions. Jim Banks is our traffic engineer and here to answer any questions related to traffic. And Tim Hall is here to answer any questions regarding the environmental -related issues for the property. I'm going to do an overview of the presentation. I know you've all read the Page 4 of 37 Page 8 of 745 March 5, 2026 materials. Then we'll open it up to -- open it up to any questions you may have. The location of the property is along Veterans Memorial Boulevard. It is approximately 78.28 acres in size, and it has an existing zoning on the property. It's PUD approved for 430 multifamily units. And the only use allowed on the property is multifamily units. So our request is to come in and amend the PUD to allow us to add single-family, two-family, and townhome options as options for development on the property. I'll get into a little bit greater detail in a second. But because we want to make that change, this is a little bit of a unique piece of property. In 1982, the property was zoned the 430 units. There was a conveyance of land to the County for Veterans Memorial Boulevard to actually be built. We're 44 years later, and we're still waiting for Veterans Memorial Boulevard to be built. But because of those transactions that occurred back in 1982, the 430 multifamily units are vested, they're approved, they're part of your transportation system. If you decide not to allow us to come in and ask to reduce the density, we still have the legal right to move forward on the 430 multifamily units. Also, there was a change -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Rich, can I interrupt you there for a moment? At the 430, that was six -story? MR. YOVANOVICH: Five stories. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Five -story. Okay. I just want to make -- MR. YOVANOVICH: And I'll get into that in a little bit greater detail. But I also wanted to get into -- there's been a change in the Comprehensive Plan since the original PUD was approved. So we're approved at a little over five units per acre today. We're vested for that. It's been deemed consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan; however, since we are now introducing the ability to do single-family and other uses on the property, if we go that way, we bring the property down to the four units per acre that's allowed in today's Comprehensive Plan. That's why you see the two different numbers in the PUD. Should we elect to no longer do 100 percent multifamily project, we actually bring down the number of units that can occur on the property, and that's what we're doing with today's petition by adding those additional uses. Just by way of kind of where are we located, to our -- or to the right on this screen to our east is Aubrey Rogers High School, to our left and the west and to the north is Conservation Collier property, and to our south is Imperial Golf Course. Mediterra is kind of caddy -corner to us to, I think -- Mediterra is kind of over in that direction along Veterans Memorial Boulevard. As you work your way further to the east, you get to Livingston Road, and you also have Veterans Memorial Elementary School located on that road where my children were educated, if anybody wanted that tidbit of advice -- or knowledge. So it's been a long time coming to try to get this piece of property developed. As I have already said, we're asking -- we're already vested at 430 multifamily units. We're asking for the ability to add single-family, which would bring the density down to 313 residential dwelling units if we introduce single-family to the mix, which is, candidly, the intention for this project, to go forward with some single-family in it. So should we get approved, there will be, more than likely, a reduction in the Page 5 of 37 Page 9 of 745 March 5, 2026 overall density for this piece of property. This is the existing master plan. It would allow five -story buildings throughout the development and the 430 units. This is the master plan you have in your packet. We've had some discussions with our neighbors in Castlewood and with staff regarding what would be an appropriate height next to the Castlewood community. And if we could switch over to the visualizer, I'll show you a modification that we've agreed to with staff and the residents in Castlewood, or at least the HOA in Castlewood. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Rich, is this going in the PUD? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. This is going to be a modification to the master plan in the PUD. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. I haven't seen anything yet. MR. YOVANOVICH: I know. It just got resolved yesterday, so -- but as soon as it gets on -- I don't think -- Heidi, we're just going to -- we'll go in, and we'll put language in the PUD that limits us to two stories. I'll give you the paper, Heidi -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- that will limit us to a maximum of two stories single-family in that purple area. So we'll depict it on the master plan like we're doing now with the crosshatching, and then we'll put in a commitment in the commitment section that will be limited to two stories in that particular area of the -- of the development. I had conversations -- there are three staff recommendations. I had conversations with Mr. Bosi regarding those three recommendations. Obviously, this was one of the staff recommendations to go to two stories in this area. We've agreed with that staff recommendation. We had further discussions about the staff recommendation regarding the change to the rear setback. We explained to him that the product type that is going to be built on this property wants to take advantage of the lakes that will be in this project. Maybe if we go back to the presentation and the original master plan in your packet, you can see there's a nice lake system, and the desire is to be able to pull the homes closer to the lake system. That's why we have in there the ability to go to zero -foot setback if we're adjacent to an open space or lake tract. Keep in mind that there's always going to be a 20-foot lake maintenance easement between the water and the property line anyway. So if someone wants to pull in closer with their home or their accessory uses, that's why we've asked for the reduction to 10 feet and five feet, and if we're on an open face -- an open space tract or lake, we can go to zero. And Mr. Bosi and I had further conversations, and he's told me staff is comfortable with the language that's currently in our version of the PUD regarding the setbacks, so I think we're in agreement there. Staffs going to withdraw their objection to -- or their recommendation to modify the rear setback. I think the only issue that we're not in agreement on is the request that we go to Dark Sky lighting. And Dark Sky lighting -- Dark Sky lighting has been applied to commercial projects. It has not been applied to residential projects in the urban area. It has been applied to projects out east like the Estates or Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District and the RLSA where you have a different environment, but it has not been applied to the urban area. So we have taken the position that the Land Development Code is appropriate. The way the Land Development Code has our internal lighting is there's limitations on it really is not allowed to spill over to our neighbors' property anyway. Page 6 of 37 Page 10 of 745 March 5, 2026 So we've said -- our position is if there's a problem with the lighting standards in the urban area, change the Land Development Code. Don't do this on a case -by -case basis, the PUD. So we're not in agreement with staff s recommendation to go to the Dark Sky lighting within the urban area. The bottom line is we're really not going to be an impact to our neighbors with the existing lighting standards that are in the code. I'm fully aware that they have issues -- Castlewood and others may have issues with the lighting associated with the high school and their ball fields, but we're not -- we're not a high school with ball fields. We're a residential development that is going to meet the Land Development Code requirements for lighting, and we believe those are appropriate for purposes of the development of this property. That's basically what I wanted to highlight. You can have any comments or questions for Wayne or Mr. Banks regarding our traffic analysis or planning. But basically what we're adding is the ability to do single-family, two-family, and townhome development with appropriate development standards associated with that in the PUD. We are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. We're vested for most of our traffic, and we'll have to meet the County's requirements for any new traffic. Related but not part of the PUD is a development agreement that's going to the Board of County Commissioners hopefully in March for us to design, permit, and construct the extension of Veterans Memorial Boulevard to basically the railroad. The County will take it over from the railroad further west, my understanding all the way to U.S. 41. So we will -- we will build improvements to Veterans Memorial Boulevard to give us access to Veterans Memorial as part of the development of this project. Again, that's something that goes to the Board of County Commissioners, but I believe it was mentioned in your staff report. We will also be going through the process of vacating -- sorry. If you look at the southern boundary of this parcel, there was a road right-of-way created in an OR book by a reservation in a -- I don't know if I can blow this up. I can't. But right here is where it is. It's along the southern 30 feet of this property. It has already been vacated through the parcels to the west, which is the Krehling property. So it goes to nowhere. So we've submitted a vacation petition to vacate that 30 feet. We've received letters of no objection from all the appropriate utilities as well as from Imperial and from Castlewood to go forward with that vacation. Again, not related to this application but part of what's happening as part of the development. With that, that's the overview. Our team is here to answer any specific questions you may have. And that's our presentation. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. I'm going to ask the first question. In regards to the setback from the lakes. MR. YOVANOVICH: The lakes, yeah. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The lakes. That's a 25-foot distance. MR. YOVANOVICH: Whatever the lake maintenance easement is, that will remain. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. But are these homes that will be backing up in those areas, are those fee -simple lots, or are those in condominium? Are those townhomes? MR. YOVANOVICH: Right now it could be either. Page 7 of 37 Page 11 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Either. MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, it could either, but the intention is, along where you see the Rs, should the contract purchaser go through this -- go through with the acquisition, they will be single-family units. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: But just for clarity, you're still 25 feet from -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Sorry? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: You're still 25 feet from the shoreline of the lake. It's just -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: It's just a matter of homeowners cannot plant in that area or other -- do other things in that area because it is a lake maintenance -- lake maintenance easement. But you're still -- you still have a 25-foot distance. MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. There's going to be a tract line -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- that is for the tract for the lake. Within this area right here, you can kind of see the gap between the water and the property line. That's about 25 feet distance. So there will always be green space between the property line and the water. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So the onus is on the HOA or the homeowner or the board of some sort, whatever the management entity is, to make sure that that lake maintenance easement is always clear. MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct, and that would have been their responsibility anyways. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I have no issues. That 25-foot is pretty significant. The second thing I want to -- and maybe, Jaime, if I could ask you because my colleagues understand this was a special treatment overlay, and, again, I put on the record, I'm very familiar with this property having walked it even 10 years ago. I remember, like, being there. There are pretty significant and pristine wetlands in that area and with a pretty significant jurisdictional determination. But this had a previous special treatment overlay, but it's being waived because of the existing zoning. Can you explain that, please, so my colleagues understand that? I understand it, but I want to make sure it's for the record. MS. COOK: So good morning. Jaime Cook, director of Development Review, for the record. Typically when a property goes through a rezoning -- rezoning, the ST overlay, the special treatment overlay, is removed as part of that rezoning because we're establishing the requirements for the preservation areas. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. MS. COOK: Those preserves were previously established with the '82 ordinance. I'm not exactly sure why the ST overlay wasn't removed then. But this -- this zoning change would officially remove it, and these preserve areas, as shown on this master plan, would be the established preserve areas. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. And, again, I commend the staff in regards -- typically we do not separate preserves, but in this case there are very significant areas to protect in this property, and I think it was a great idea. Tim may have probably coordinated this with the staff, but several areas to protect out there because there were Page 8 of 37 Page 12 of 745 March 5, 2026 jurisdictional wetlands, but at the same time staff coordinated to preserve these areas in conjunction with the lake. So I think it's a great idea. I don't know if my other colleagues have any comments on that. But to protect the areas that needed to be protected, it was a great way to resolve it, and I noted at the -- MS. COOK: Correct. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: -- one of the comments in the neighborhood information meeting, one of the -- which was an interesting comment. Somebody wanted the lakes moved so they could have better scenery and -- where was that comment? Anyways, there was a comment about could you -- could they move the lakes. But though it's a great comment, typically those lakes and the lands to be preserved and the jurisdictional wetlands are all based on permitting process. So though it was a comment, it typically is you just don't move a lake just to provide -- provide a viewpoint. The lakes are there because they were required. Is that -- through your review process, you guys established and determined all that? MS. COOK: Correct. We -- aesthetics are not part of our review process. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Correct. MS. COOK: We're looking at things like listed species, wetlands on the property. And so we work with the developer on their proposal to protect the most sensitive areas. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Thanks. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: I've got a question related to that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Mike, yeah, go ahead, then -- I'm jumping ahead of Randy, but we'll hold him. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: That's okay. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Can you go back one slide where this is overlaid onto the -- I'm just looking for -- I could see on the -- on the images there's a -- MR. YOVANOVICH: This one? COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: There's a big cypress dome there, and it looks to me like your master plan or your site map that you're going -- putting a road right through that cypress dome. Is that -- this is related to environmental. I'm just trying to -- MS. COOK: So, actually, I believe -- you're talking about this one down here? COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Yeah. MS. COOK: That is actually going to be one of their proposed preserve areas. It may be slightly impacted by the lake, but it will be mostly protected as one of their preserves. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Okay. Perfect. Thanks. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's an area I remember walking specifically, and it was already identified in previous permitting as preservation. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Okay, perfect. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Good point, Mike. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Thank you. MR. YOVANOVICH: Can I just correct one thing on the record? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: The lake maintenance easement is 20 feet in width, not 25. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Twenty feet? MR. YOVANOVICH: Twenty feet. Page 9 of 37 Page 13 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. But it's still -- MR. YOVANOVICH: It's still -- it's still a clear area -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Clear distance away. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- that will be maintained, but I just wanted everybody to understand it's a 20-foot lake maintenance easement, not 25. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I mean, if somebody wanted to sit down there in a lawn chair, no big deal, but you can't plant an orange tree or something else there. MR. YOVANOVICH: It's going to be the HOA's -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: HOA's responsibility, thanks. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- property. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Randy? COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Rich, two quick questions for you, if I may, please, sir. If this proposal does not go through today and/or at the BCC, can you walk in and put the 430 multifamily dwelling units the next day without any other -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, I've got to do a Site Development Plan, and I've got to get a building permit. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Right. MR. YOVANOVICH: But, yes, we can go in tomorrow -- COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: And do it. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- and we would build a driveway from the existing -- COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: From the end. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- end of VME, and we would go forward with 430 multifamily units and five -story buildings. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Great. Thank you. And another quick question. I was trying to follow the last conversations, including with what Ms. Jaime was talking about. But looking at an aerial map and your site proposal plan -- forgive me for not understanding this. But the current two bodies of water, they're going to be reconfigured -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: -- into this new I'll call it elongated lake. MR. YOVANOVICH: There's the before. That's what's approved today. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Today, right. MR. YOVANOVICH: And that's the after. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: So you are modifying -- MR. YOVANOVICH: We reconfigured the lakes. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: -- the current -- gotcha. All right. Very good. Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Nobody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I'm going to ask the questions on Dark Skies. I realize that that was presented by staff, and it's been withdrawn now, or do you -- is it still staff -- because I -- in essence, you're still installing traffic -- or streetlights down focused, those kind of things. It's not going to be abusive and obtrusive in any way. We're still doing the same thing we typically do in a development. The Dark Skies were far more restrictive. I really agree with your statement, unless Page 10 of 37 Page 14 of 745 March 5, 2026 we change the LDC, I can't support the requirement for Dark Skies. I can support, though, if -- the statement on the record that we're going to at least comply with shaded down lighting and other types of streetlight. MR. YOVANOVICH: We will meet the current county lighting requirements -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- which has protections for our neighbors. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And I think Jim might have talked about -- Jim Banks might have talked about this in the past. I know Norm has as well, our other astute traffic engineer but -- unless Wayne wants to cover it. Typically the kind of lighting we install in a community is not something that's going to create this abusive or obtrusive lighting throughout -- throughout this community. MR. YOVANOVICH: I think staff agrees that this is the existing code requirements. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Existing code. MR. YOVANOVICH: The existing code is sufficient. I'd like to say I applauded staff, but I don't, for their trying to get a little bit more. But I get it. I understand it. But change the code if you want to change -- if you want to change the standards. Don't just make it for one project at a time. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Can I ask a question? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. Go ahead, Chuck. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: What's the current code -- COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: So Veterans -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Chuck -- I missed it. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Two Chucks don't make a right. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Two Chucks. MR. YOVANOVICH: Two Chucks don't make a right. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Charles, Chuck. Go ahead, Chuck. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: What's the current -- Mike, what's the current code -required, like, height -wise of those light poles within the community? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Typically 25, 30 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Twenty-five, 30 feet. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah, at best. MR. BOSI: For -- I'm not -- in the site planning world for the most part, but I do remember -- I think it's 25 feet -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Twenty-five feet. MR. BOSI: -- but I can't say that for an absolute certainty. I don't believe it would be over 30 feet, but I believe it's 25 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: This might be a question for Wayne, but what height are these light poles throughout the community planned and -- MR. YOVANOVICH: We don't -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Don't know yet? MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know what the plan is yet, but we're going to meet -- we're going to meet the code. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Okay. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's a good question. And that's why Dark Skies is Page 11 of 37 Page 15 of 745 March 5, 2026 kind of -- how do you enforce it? Because somebody might want to leave their garage light on outside their garage all night to -- and that would be basically a violation of the Dark Skies. So I think what they're proposing is fine. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Okay. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Charles. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: This Veterans Memorial Boulevard, that's eventually going to dump into 41; is that correct? MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct, both Old 41 and 41. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Okay. Is there any -- do we have any idea when that road is going to be finished and done? MR. YOVANOVICH: I could -- well -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I was a youngster when they talked about it. That was many years ago. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: So we're a long way away. MR. YOVANOVICH: No, no, no. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: We're closer. MR. YOVANOVICH: We -- Mike Sawyer -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Mike Sawyer -- MR. YOVANOVICH: -- can answer this, but it's in -- it's in the five-year plan. It's in the five-year plan. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: So within five years? MR. YOVANOVICH: That's the plan. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: It was five years -- five years 15 years ago. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Well, let me tell you the reason I'm asking this. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The difficulty has been vacating the easement and -- COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: I'm interested in the answer, but let me tell you why I'm interested in this. I live up here. MR. YOVANOVICH: Sure. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: I've got to tell you -- and this has got nothing to do with whether we approve Plan A or Plan B. The traffic situation in that part of North Naples is outrageously bad. This is going to make it worse. And, again, it's got nothing to do with whether we're dealing with A or B. The traffic on Old 41, for example, is nuts. The traffic on Bonita Beach Road is even more nuts. This is going to do nothing but make it worse. I just want everybody to know that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Well -- COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: The only way to change it is to revoke -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's not true. They're already vested for 430 units. That vesting -- COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: I know that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So if they build what they -- if they build what they want to right now -- what they're proposing is better than what they're allowed to do right now. You can't stop them from building what they want to do right now under the current zoning. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: I understand that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: That's what I -- that's what I was about to say. Page 12 of 37 Page 16 of 745 March 5, 2026 I just want to make everyone aware that the current zoning is making a very bad situation in that part of north analysis even worse. There's nothing I can do about it. There's nothing this commission can do about it. It would require a rezoning and probably would have the County buy the land to stop it. But I'm a little bit dismayed or upset or concerned, whatever -- however you want to word it, that we're making an intolerable traffic situation even worse regardless of what we do. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well -- and Lorraine will answer the questions, but hopefully -- COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: No, that's all I have to say. MR. YOVANOVICH: Hopefully when we finally get Veterans Memorial built, there will be a much better traffic circulation in the northern part of Collier County. She'll address the timing portion. COMMISSIONER COLUCCL• Okay. Thank you. MS. LANTZ: Lorraine Lantz, Transportation Planning. Veterans is scheduled for design in Fiscal Year'26. There's right-of-way acquisition that's a component of that. That's also funded in'27, Fiscal Year'27, and then construction to begin -- I'm not saying to end, right? You're not going to see bulldozers. But it's scheduled to start in Fiscal Year'28. Again, that's -- you know, we have to do procurement. There's other processes before you actually see bulldozers and construction vehicles on it. This -- I think Rich mentioned this -- I started with Transportation Planning going for grants to try to fund this project, and I started in about 2015. So we've been looking for fundings. There's immense opportunities for interconnections. There's -- I get calls constantly about people who want to go to the school and have to go all the way around Immokalee Road, and that is causing congestion. But those trips for this particular development are already vested, so we are already calculating them in our AUIR that you see for whatever the levels of service are. So having this interconnection to go all the way to U.S. 41 will help the network in its entirety so that people can go different ways. And we're all about having different opportunities, different options. They could go through Veterans. They could go Immokalee Road. They could go up to Bonita Beach. They would have a different option. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Paul. COMMISSIONER SHEA: A different question for Mike. What's your opinion on this Dark Sky? I don't feel the resolution. Joe feels that he agrees with the petitioner. I haven't heard your side yet. MR. BOSI: From staffs perspective, we had reviewed the -- the comments that were received at the neighborhood information meeting related to lighting, and we recognize that it was probably more focused upon the school and the stadiums in closer proximity to the Castlewood development. But because of that, we had suggested the Dark Skies principle. And we don't disagree with the applicant. We have not asked for this within a residential community within the urbanized area. And we can most certainly back off of requesting the Dark Skies compliance. What we would still suggest, maybe as appropriate for the Planning Commission at least to consider, "The site lighting fixtures shall have a maximum color temperature of Page 13 of 37 Page 17 of 745 March 5, 2026 3,000K." We don't have that regulation within our LDC. It basically just says it has to be down -shielded, can't be intrusive or can't be -- the light can't be spilling to other properties. That's the restriction that we have, but we have nothing related to the temperature. So I would say for common areas and for the street system, that that -- light fixtures having a maximum color temperature of 3,000K would be something still we think would have value and could have a beneficial effect upon, you know, the overall lighting of the area and its -- and its influence or -- on an adjacent community. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So that's a request for the petitioner? MR. BOSI: It's a request for the -- I'm asking the petitioner. The petitioner doesn't want to yield that. I'm asking the Planning Commission to just debate the merits of that. MR. YOVANOVICH: Again, I don't know what the impact of that is on the project from a -- from a cost perspective. If the concern is lights spilling onto the neighbors -- your staff just confirmed we're not going to spill light on the neighbors. Again, if you want to start making changes to the Land Development Code, make the changes to the Land Development Code and make it uniform. Make it apply to all residential projects that will be coming through this process, whether it's straight zoning or PUD zoning. But to ask us to agree to something that I don't know what the impact is when you're not going to require anybody else to do it unless they come through with a PUD to rezone the property, I don't think that that's the right process to do that. The right process is to amend the Land Development Code. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Mike. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Well, you are establishing -- COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Yeah. I'm really hung up on this Dark Skies thing. I do think we should change the Land Development Code. Do I think it's unfair to ask this petitioner to comply even though we haven't changed the LDC? Yes. But I think it would be a nice gesture. I'm not -- for you to do that. But I do think we should change the LD -- we could try to change it. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Commissioner, you're here to establish compatibility, so if you think the lights need to be addressed, then you can do that. We wouldn't have that provision here as a proposal if it was an LDC requirement because it would already be required. So you have the ability to address the lights as a compatibility measure. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: That's all I have. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Randy. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Scientifically, I think we have to look at this Dark Sky request differently. If -- in some developments you have -- the term may not be correct, but I'll call it a lantern -style light that has a bulb in the center, glass on four sides, and it emanates light everywhere across the roadway, onto lawns nearby. If you're not doing something like that and you're doing what they used to call the old type down or gooseneck, right, pointing down, the amount of light that physically can get over to Castlewood is minimal just by physics of what that light -- the amount of light that could come out from the road to go across over to Castlewood. The one thing that I don't appreciate is the inconsistency, as we have talked about multiple times here. If it's a requirement for any type of a project, let's say, for Dark Sky, then we need to make that a requirement, a suggestion, maybe there's a compromise, maybe depending upon -- at time of Site Development Planning, they can indicate, you know what, we found a pretty decent light that still is attractive, we'll keep it at 3,000K, which is the warm light. Page 14 of 37 Page 18 of 745 March 5, 2026 These are not 3,000. These are about 42-. It's the more yellowish light. Maybe that can be done. But realistically, even it was the globe type of light with glass all the way around, the amount of light that's going to come over to Candle Wood is -- Castlewood, excuse me, is minimal. If they can come with a goose light, 98 percent of your problems are solved. MR. YOVANOVICH: And if you look at the master plan that I put back up, that light would have to go through the house that's going to be constructed between us and Castlewood. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: So it's only -- MR. YOVANOVICH: So if you're talking about the lighting in the streets, you're talking about you could see the -- you know, it's a nonissue. Change the code. You know, if you want to change the code to where everything's going to be, you know -- I'm not saying we won't consider it, but what I'm saying is to mandate it, I think, is inappropriate. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: If a homeowner -- two-story homeowner on that bottom right corner were to have security lights on the back of their house all night long at 100, 150 watts, right -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: I'm not for or against. I'm just bringing out facts that we have to consider -- that could go directly into a Castlewood home. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Yeah, but that would be regulated by the condo association or their homeowner association. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: They don't have -- I don't think anyone can indicate what you can do for security. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: They cannot. I'll add that, years of CDD, I got more complaints about streetlights not -- being burned out than I ever had -- I can never -- I never heard a complaint about streetlights being too bright. And I think the Dark Sky issue, personal opinion -- I'll wait till I hear public speakers, but I think it's far too restrictive. And I think we need a lot more study from staff, and it should be an LDC issue and not forced upon the developer just because somebody thinks it's a good idea. But I'll wait to hear from the public speakers. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: No, I agree with that. I don't think it should be forced on the developer, but I do think something needs to be done about it. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I agree. And we can direct staff to do that. I'd be very interested -- I go back 15 years when I was on staff as the administrator. We had issues with light as well. It's been talked about for 15, 20 years and Dark Skies a big issue even in the Rural Lands Stewardship, which it's already in the code in some areas in that part of the County, part of the requirements. But this is the urban area next to a high school. MR. YOVANOVICH: And I'm hoping this exhibit helps a little bit to put it in perspective just how far back the homes are on Castlewood from our boundary. I mean, you're talking about you have 200 -- 215 feet before you even get to our property line between their buffer and their -- the width of their lake, and then you have our buffer and the back of our houses. I just -- I just think that this is an issue that came about because of the high school. Sorry, Amy. But it really came about because of the ball fields. And I don't really think it's a residential lighting issue. It's a high school ball field lighting issue for the neighbors. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Wait one, Mike. Chuck. Page 15 of 37 Page 19 of 745 March 5, 2026 COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Actually, Rich, thanks for pulling that up, because what I wanted to talk about was that buffer. I've seen with a lot of the development, they go in there with an SDP, once it's there, they go in to clear, and they clear everything. So I was going to ask you or Wayne the proposal of leaving those mature trees that are on that buffer instead of taking them down on your side as part of that 15 feet. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, to the extent we can keep the trees, we're going to keep the trees, but then we have to supplement them obviously to meet the code standard for a Type B buffer. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: And is that -- I know there's an eagle nest designation further up and then all the way up. And the only reason I'm bringing this up is because all my Veterans -- and Ms. Cook can second this because we had to deal with a certain homeowner that would call and complain about the lights. I can understand the concern for these folks, but I'm also thinking about the residents that are moving in here forward for the ball field lighting -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: -- that there is -- the trees are maintained that are there that are established, which will help cut down on that light noise coming over from the high school. So if those -- if those are staying in the buffer, that's great with me. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, to the extent we can keep them, we will. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. Let me clarify, because that buffer has Melaleuca or Brazilians pepper that has to come out. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: That comes out. But talking about the pines and other trees that are there. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: It also helps mitigate light coming from your development over to Castlewood if these trees are there. MR. YOVANOVICH: And there's come in ours. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Pardon me? MR. YOVANOVICH: And theirs come in ours. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's true. MR. YOVANOVICH: They don't have Dark Skies. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. With that, Mike, you had one comment, because I want to go to -- I know you have staff report, but I want to go to public speakers, first. MR. BOSI: Sure, just one comment related to the suggestion for the Dark Skies. And I understand the position of the applicant. But I will say I want to provide the justification for our staff s action. My staff -- my staff, when they are at a neighborhood information meeting, they hear adjoining property owners to the project and they express concern about lighting, and we recognize that that is a concern from the community that -- an existing community that's going to -- that's going to share common areas or common space with an adjacent proposed development. We proposed a standard that has been often utilized, as the applicant says, east of 951. Very frequently that we utilize the Dark Sky provision when we have lighting concerns. So we defaulted to what we've done in the past because of the concerns we heard from the adjoining public. Page 16 of 37 Page 20 of 745 March 5, 2026 We're not -- we weren't mandating -- we're not absolutely mandating, like, this is the only position that we're going to have, and we can't have any flexibility. We wanted the conversation to be shared with the Board -- or with the Planning Commission so we could have the discussion that we're talking about. And it sounds like there may be some direction for staff in terms of if you feel that it -- it appropriate to incorporate Dark Skies further and develop it into our LDC. That's the purpose of why we put the condition. We wanted the applicant to react in this way to be able to have this conversation. So we don't think it's inappropriate for staff to say we're going to try to address concerns that we've heard at a neighborhood information meeting. Now, whether this is the right -- the right solution for this particular problem, that's what this discussion is trying to get to. That's the whole purpose of why we did it, just to give you the example of why we -- why we initiated this additional condition. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: I'm sorry. Is there a -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Chuck. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: -- cost difference in between Dark Skies to just standard lighting, Rich? MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't -- Mr. Schumacher, I don't know. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: I'm trying to figure out what the rough here is that if staff is requesting it, the petitioner says, you know, we're just sticking with the code, which is -- I agree with, it's fine. I'm just trying to understand if there is a cost difference that is considerable here or -- MR. YOVANOVICH: The answer here is I don't know. I don't know the answer. I do know that -- and I'm not saying they may not choose to go that way. What I'm saying is there's a process, in my opinion and the property owner's opinion, on how you change the code. I think that there's been no testimony that the existing county lighting standards makes a project incompatible with another residential neighborhood. Mike wanted to have this conversation. We've had the conversation. I think -- there's a process that needs to be followed. And my client has said, let's follow -- we'll consider it, but let's follow the process. We don't want something mandated on us that isn't going to be mandated on every other residential development that's coming forward in the future. And I think that's a fair position to take. I don't -- for all I know, it may be cheaper. I don't think it is, but who knows -- I don't know the answer. I don't know the answer. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Michelle. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: I appreciate staffs concern for the neighbors in bringing this up, I really do, and I'm glad you did that. I believe that the concern has arisen, though, as was mentioned already because of the concern of the high school and the lights there. So I think I want to get an understanding of is this a problem. Like, when I was on City Council for four years, just like yours, Chair, the complaints I heard was the lights were not bright enough. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: The neighborhoods were too dark. Is that still the complaints today, or are people complaining that neighborhoods are too bright? Because I never heard that. And even in my own neighborhood, it's so dark. If you try to back out of Page 17 of 37 Page 21 of 745 March 5, 2026 your garage at night, if somebody's behind there, you're going to run over -- you just can't see at night in my neighborhood. So I -- I just -- and I am about if it's not in the code -- but like Heidi said, we can consider it at this point. But anyway. So is this a problem? Is lighting a problem in neighborhoods is, I guess, my question. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I have to agree with you. Lighting, most complaints are it's not bright enough. And that's really from people getting up early in the morning walking their dog. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Yeah. Or at night or... CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Or at night. And the streetlights provide adequate lighting. I think if there's some kind of restriction -- and I have no idea what -- to look at what I would call a standard globe -type light at 30 feet versus what -- Dark Skies. I have no idea what the difference is. I just -- and I think it's compatibility -- if I talk compatibility, then I would say reciprocity. The neighbor -- neighboring property would have to do the same. I just can't see imposing a restriction that doesn't exist. And we can specify just -- the LDC is very clear, down -shaded lighting and all those type of things that we've implemented in the past, and I think that's more than adequate. Go ahead, Mike. MR. BOSI: I would just let you know that those aren't quite accurate statements. We routinely impose Dark Sky lighting within the SRAs that we approve. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. BOSL• So we're not -- this isn't something that we just, you know, arrived upon. This is something we've had a history with. I agree that it's -- the history with has been east of 951 in the more rural areas, but it's a standard that we've adopted with into our regulatory documents. The SRAs that would have been proposed have had this type of language. So we've had that Dark Sky language in various PUDs prior. It's just not within the urbanized area, and I agree -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. MR. BOSI: -- this would be one of the first times we asked for that. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Chair -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: But typically it's not an issue because the applicant already understands the requirement and has agreed to comply with it. MR. YOVANOVICH: And not to keep this thing going, but remember out east people are used to being able to look up in the sky and see the stars. That's the purpose of Dark Sky lighting. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. MR. YOVANOVICH: It's a different standard in the urban area. You know, the whole purpose of that is -- out east is -- you know, was to not have light pollution. You already got -- you already have light pollution, if you want to use that term, in the urban area. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Chair, if I could ask another. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Mike, are there complaints in neighborhoods in the urban areas saying that my neighborhood is too bright? MR. BOSI: Not that I'm aware of. Page 18 of 37 Page 22 of 745 March 5, 2026 COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Right. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. We're going to go to public speakers. Do we have -- our first public speaker, please, or is somebody signed up to speak? Go ahead. MR. JOHNSON: Mr. Chair, we have three public speakers. Two are in person and one on WebEx. These are the registered ones. The first public speaker is Paul Ewing, followed by Jim Reichart. Mr. Ewing, please step up. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Five-minute limit, please. MR. EWING: Absolutely. Thank you. And thank you for your work. Am I good? One more time, can you hear me? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Move the microphone up there. MR. EWING: Ah, that's the magic, okay. In a moment, you may wish I turned it back away. Hey, really, I want to thank you guys. This is tough work and absolutely unappreciated. And I know that there's a hill of information that needs to be climbed. And it's not about the merits of an argument. It's just the facts are the facts. And I do understand that there's an option to be able to go and build 431 five -story units, but when this option was given, the economic cost of building a five -story unit probably made sense to your owners, but you're not building five -story units today because the economic cost of the new codes are such that it wouldn't make sense. We have builders that will tell you that there's a reason why you're building 20 two-story units and not four fives. So don't think that this is dead, that there's not a way to be accommodative and appropriate to what the neighborhood needs for both our new neighbors, because we want new neighbors, and the existing neighborhood. So what are my core concerns? And I'm going to limit it to this: One, that much of that zone is zoned AE and AH, which carry a I percent risk of flooding in the FEMA flood maps. Castlewood is AX which has a .2. Building and zoning is not my specialty, but math, I'm pretty good. One percent is greater than .2. That means that anything that they add to that area that brings that flood risk over onto our side -- in Ian, the water level came within 12 inches of my pool deck. And I, by the way, live exactly on the end, right? So I'm the one that's on the end looking across at this development, across the lake. So when we discuss this with our neighbors, there's a mutual concern about that, and they want you to hear that. There's not enough accommodations that have been discussed this morning. I don't know at the neighborhood information, but if you had seen what we were given for information to discuss during that conference, it's nothing like what you're seeing now. The neighbors have not had an opportunity to see this. They've not had an opportunity to have a discussion about it. They've not had a discussion about -- you know, I look across at 50-foot-tall pine trees. You know, you talk about 25 -- 20 feet being a pretty fair distance from the water's edge, well, let's be clear, it's cleared 10 feet. And this -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Sir, you have to speak from -- up here. We have to put it on the record. MR. EWING: Okay. So mid room is 20 feet (indicating). You're talking about 10 feet is the buffer zone if you don't make these buildings -- these buildings step back from there. That means that we're going to lose much of those pines. That means that Page 19 of 37 Page 23 of 745 March 5, 2026 what you imagine to be a buffer is still a see -through area. And, you know, with that, when you think about the buffer and the -- how much of this you clear, all of that affects the speed at which this water floods, and it also affects the amount of surface area that is not available to absorb. Respectfully, I would like you to send this back to flood and utility use and ask them to reevaluate the zero lot line. Second, we are a gated community. We have a very substantial investment in 24/7 security in that area. There's no discussion about fencing to secure our neighborhood. I feel like that's a pretty valid right that we should have that -- while it wasn't considered in the PUD, I think it's something that, given the economic realities, that that is something that we should take back and consider. I'm going to cede rest of my time to my neighbor who is much more qualified on the building part of this. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Well, 16 seconds left, but next speaker. MR. EWING: You get it. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Next speaker, please. MR. JOHNSON: Next speaker is Jim Reichert. MR. REICHERT: I'm Jim Reichert. I live across the street from Paul. So we're all looking at it. And, you know, they brought up lots of different things. You know, ideally, if you ask me, I'd like Collier Conservation [sic] to buy the property. I don't think that's going to happen because it's adjacent to a nice area already owned by Collier Conservation. So things that I see is I went through -- I liked all the staff recommendations. I mean, we're dealing with -- you know, Mr. Schmitt, how about I come sit in front of your house every night from 7 to 10, open my windows, play loud music. That's what I listen to every day from the high school. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I have no control over the high school. Thank you. MR. REICHERT: I'm just telling you what reality is. And the light pollution from the high school is awful. So in this thing on the PUD, I'd be -- you know, development is development. You know, the world develops, and we all have to deal with it. I'd like to see them eliminate the multifamily and go to single-family and townhouse only. I don't know if that, you know, makes financial sense for them or maybe, you know, it's some combination of bringing it down where Castlewood is more so. Mr. Yovanovich, I talked to the president of the association, and he has not signed off on any of the things for the -- that you claim is agreed to by Castlewood. So I don't know where that's coming from, but he has not. The setbacks, I think, are necessary. If you go look at their two maps -- I don't know if you can bring up the original PUD, but that original PUD had a road next to the Castlewood area, and you have the setback for the road. You have the road right-of-way and all that, and it moves everything 200 feet inboard on their property, and now it's at the property line. So I don't think you should have any modification on the setback. And I think they should have to redraw their layout. And one of the things that came up in some of your comments was that they didn't indicate what's going where. And that's been a controversy for Castlewood is we keep asking them -- we write them letters -- "Tell us what you're doing," and nothing. Page 20 of 37 Page 24 of 745 March 5, 2026 Same thing on the easement vacation. They asked us not to object. And we wrote them a letter and said, "Tell us what you're doing so we know what's going on." Nothing. So those type of things I'm concerned about. You know, the other things that were in staff issues we're -- you know, the bears, the eagle plan, burrowing owls. The bear report is over two years old, hasn't been done since the high school got built. And we do see bears, and nothing's being done about that. I have to -- you know, in the staff report, the bonneted bat and burrowing owl, nothing was said about those. I mean, I'm not the most green guy in the world, but I think as we've developed, we've taken away areas that the animals use for migration. I mean, I was walking on the golf course the other day, and, you know -- I know everybody sees deer everywhere, but there was a cougar -- either a cougar or a panther that was right out on the golf course and ran into their property. So to me it's important that we address those issues. Another point of addressing might be extend the preserve area. Instead of having it in the center of the property -- and I realize there's reasons for all this. Instead of having it in the center of the property, proceed down the line so the animals have a corridor to get out. Right now they've got to run through some houses. They've got to cross a road. I mean, you probably wouldn't want your kids doing that if they had to migrate to the golf course. So that's all I have to say. I appreciate your time. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Thank you. You do understand, though, they still have to go through all of the permitting requirements, they still have to comply with the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. Those go through the federal permitting process, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It will go out to other commenting agencies, and they still have to go through the South Florida Water Management District permit. Those are the agencies that review all of the environmental requirements and concerns. There's protected species, endangered species, and if there's any of those species that are identified, then there's -- there's opportunities to mitigate or compensate. So those are all part of the application process. We understand -- and the staff reviews those, but those restrictions are through the federal agencies in regards to listed -- listed or endangered species. MR. REICHERT: Also, another point I forgot to bring up -- I'm not a professional speaker, so you'll have to pardon me. But all of their water is coming to the golf course. There's a -- I believe it's a 48-inch drain that runs all along the south side of the property. And I would be as concerned as Paul is with the flooding. Now, I, fortunately, am a foot higher than Paul, so -- but, you know, something to maybe consider is that they deal with the water. Maybe they -- you set the elevation of every foundation in that division at the same elevation as ours so that they flood at the same time we flood. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I would probably guess they're going to be higher, because they have a new BFE out there, base flood elevation, that's in accordance with the maps -- the flood maps. Also, in regards to water, they cannot trespass water. That's going to be dealt with, and that's through calculations. And through the application process through the South Florida Water Management District, they're going to have to deal with Page 21 of 37 Page 25 of 745 March 5, 2026 how they displace water. And if there's water being displaced on your property, that's a trespassing issue that they need to -- they need to prevent. MR. REICHERT: I think they have some agreement with the golf course already to -- for their drainage. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I don't know. I would have to defer to Tim Hall if that exists or to the applicant. I know nothing about that. MR. REICHERT: And I was reading something in the documents that said that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Thank you. MR. REICHERT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Next speaker, please. MR. JOHNSON: Mr. Chair, those are all the registered speakers. Did you want to ask if there's other speakers in person? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. Are there any other speakers that would like to speak, or is there anybody online that would like to speak? MR. JOHNSON: There is one person online. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Thank you. MR. JOHNSON: His name is Brad Cornell. Mr. Cornell. MR. CORNELL: Thank you. This is Brad Cornell. I'm the policy director for Audubon Western Everglades. Mr. Chair, thank you for the opportunity to address you and the commissioners on this item. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. MR. CORNELL: I have several comments. First, I'd like to address some compatibility issues. As you all know, on the west and north sides of this project are the Railhead Scrub Preserve, which is one of the rarest habitat types in Florida, coastal scrub. And on the west side of the project is a whole residential strip. There is no buffer next to that preserve. And so our recommendation is that you need a buffer there for burning, for fire management purposes, and other land management purposes that would be incompatible with residential immediately adjacent to the preserve, but also we recommend the Dark Sky criteria be adhered to, especially in -- adjacent to these preserves, because Dark Sky doesn't -- the lighting doesn't just affect the neighbors. It also affects wildlife significantly, and it's a big impact on insects and wildlife, gopher tortoises, birds. It's a very important aspect of protecting the investment that the County has made in the Railhead Scrub Preserve. So Dark Skies and a fire buffer on the -- on the west side. I additionally want to recommend that there be bear -proof trash management on the -- on the project, as you have seen in the backup for this. Bear nuisance calls have been all around this part of North Collier County. I have a picture of a very large -- it looks like a 400-pound black bear immediately north of this project in the Scrub. So bears are in this area, so it's very important to avoid conflicts with people and with traffic and kids going to Aubrey Rogers. Also, the new reconfigured lake needs to have more littoral for water -quality purposes, more than the 7 percent that the code requires. More like 30 percent that you see in the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District. That's just important for water quality, for taking up nutrients, nitrogen and phosphorus. And on the northwest corner, I want to point out that the project site plans, both the 1982 and their reconfigured site plan, would destroy the most valuable, the rarest native Page 22 of 37 Page 26 of 745 March 5, 2026 habitat that's on the site, which is the scrub in the northwest corner, which is adjacent to the scrub on the Railhead Scrub Preserve. To our view, it would be easy for them to shift the development plans slightly to allow the preservation of that scrub. If it meant getting rid of some of the hydric pine in the northeast corner -- the scrub with the state -threatened gopher tortoises, there are, I think, about 11 burrows or more, a dozen burrows that have been found by the consultants -- that would be a very logical adjustment to that plan to preserve that northwest scrub. And the last thing I'll just note is that it would be really helpful to see less turf grass in this project. Speaking of water quality in this big lake, the more turf grass, the more fertilizer and irrigation. And this -- as you all know, we're in a drought. This would be a good way to save water and prevent water pollution from fertilizer. So those are our recommendations. Thank you very much for considering them. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Brad, I have a question. Have you reviewed the biological assessment or any of Tim Hall's documents? MR. CORNELL: I have gone through the environmental supplement -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Environmental supplement. MR. CORNELL: -- ERP application, so yes. Not the BA but the -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Have you made comments to the state or federal agencies? MR. CORNELL: We're preparing to. We have not yet. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Well, that's the route I say you take for -- in regards to some of your comments, because they're far more restrictive than the current LDC. And I guess you're asking us to impose these restrictions where there are really not restrictions anywhere else. These restrictions don't exist in Castlewood nor the Imperial Lakes or even Mediterra. But I understand your petition. MR. CORNELL: Mr. Chair -- yeah, the compatibility issue with the very rare scrub preserve -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. MR. CORNELL: -- that's the County preserve on the west side is the -- is the issue that's different for this project. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah, I recall vividly. I was part of the staff when we purchased that property under Conservation Collier, and it was a significant preserve, yes. Okay. Thank you. Any other comments from my colleagues? Go ahead. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: I have a question. I think Brad Cornell brought up some good points, especially the lighting that affects wildlife. So he got me on that, but then I think, well -- but everything surrounding this conservation area is -- like, the school has lights, so it's already affecting wildlife. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: It's going to be developed. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: I don't know if we make this particular spot, then, different than everything else, so that's where I'm struggling. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: But I do -- I think it's interesting, and you guys out east would know this better. But bear trash regu -- whatever the -- bear trash regulations. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I mean, we can certainly apply that restriction here that Page 23 of 37 Page 27 of 745 March 5, 2026 they have to comply with bear restrictions -- COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Yeah. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: -- but all the other communities surrounding here do not. We typically do that in the Eastern Collier County. I could tell you I don't think they do it in Mediterra or in Imperial Lakes or -- correction -- in Imperial, south, or Castlewood. Go ahead, Rich. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm sorry. We have to do a bear management plan as part of this, okay? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah, they do. MR. YOVANOVICH: If people would have read our bear management plan, you'd see we have bear -proof trash cans, okay? That's all covered through the bear management plan requirements that's in the PUD that we have a bear management plan. We have a bear management plan. So, you know -- is it my turn? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. Because I know we were focused on that question, on the wildlife. I didn't want to -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Before you start then, are there any more public speakers? MR. JOHNSON: No. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: No, none. Then I'm going to close the public hearing. I'm going to turn to the applicant to -- any rebuttal. Go ahead. MR. YOVANOVICH: A couple things. And, Mr. Chairman, you brought up my -- one of my major points was we have to go through the Water Management District for purposes of getting a water management permit, and they're going to address if -- I use the bathtub analogy. We're going to create a bathtub, that we're going to keep the water on our site, and we're going to disperse it at a rate that's dictated by the Water Management District. More likely than not it's going to improve the situation because right now it's just a free flow of water off our site -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- wherever it goes. So -- so, you know, you brought that point up that there is a process for Water Management District permitting. That's the Site Development Plan process. That's the platting process. So there is -- there is an engineering review that does occur, a very detailed engineering review. I take exception with some of the comments about this is the first -- they've not seen these plans before. This was the -- at the NIM we provided our master plan. We got their comments. We have been communicating with the HOA with regard to our request for a letter of no objections. We have -- they asked us to limit to two stories in the area I depicted. I have a signed document from the HOA president. Maybe you haven't even talked to him since -- MR. REICHERT: Talked to him yesterday. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, good. Well, we got it yesterday. So we got it yesterday afternoon, and it's being submitted to the County, because it's one of the requirements as part of the plat vacation process. So that letter will be transmitted to the County if it hasn't already been transmitted from my assistant. So we have that. Page 24 of 37 Page 28 of 745 March 5, 2026 We have responded. They may not like our responses, but we have responded to what our development is. We have an approved project, 1982. Castlewood was approved, I believe, in the '90s, maybe even late '90s, early 2000s. So you have a development that comes in knowing that there's an existing PUD that allows five -story buildings, 430 units at five stories. The gentleman who's not the expert in building is incorrect. We can afford to build those units, and we will build those units if the transaction doesn't go through. We can afford them. We will build them. We just have been waiting 44 years for access. I'm old enough that I was just about finishing college 44 years ago. But that's a long time to wait to get the right to build something that you've been vested to build for 44 years. We've been through a lot of five-year cycles that we were in the plan for this road to be built. We're finally going to get this road built, and this is a very important road for Collier County circulation. So I don't -- I don't have any sympathy to somebody who moves to a development knowing they could have five stories and now they want to somehow say, "Take that away because we built our project." We're not going to reduce the height of our buildings other than the area we agreed to do that. This is a much better project than -- the potential to bring in these single-family homes with 313 units versus multifamily at 430 is, I believe, a benefit to the overall community. It's a benefit to our neighbors. And, you know, I think the issues that people are really upset about are something that was not under our control, and that's the high school. That's the high school. That site, I think, has been identified as a school site, Ms. Lockhart could tell you how long -- MS. LOCKHART: More than 22 years. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. So it's been identified as a site for a school for 22 years. I don't know when these two gentlemen bought their house, but if it's less than 22 years, again -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I think it's more than that. MS. LOCKHART: I think it is. I think it's more than 22. MR. YOVANOVICH: More than 22 years. MS. LOCKHART: It was before I started with the school district in 2002. MR. YOVANOVICH: So that's 23. So that's -- plus, you know -- so we're talking probably somewhere north of 23 years ago that this has been identified as a school site. We are proposing a very good project. We are consistent with the Land Development Code. Our request for the changes to the rear -yard setback for the -- for our houses and our accessory uses is not out of scale with other projects that have been approved in Collier County and other PUDs that have been approved in Collier County. We have a 15-foot-wide landscape buffer around our perimeter before we even get to our rear yard line. So there's a -- there's an appropriate buffer for what we're asking. We've accommodated the request from Castlewood to limit the height to two stories adjacent to their perimeter. If they want a gated community, they should build their own gate. It's not our job to provide them security that they want that they could have controlled at the very beginning by making their own community gated. This happens a lot where people say, "Oh, no, I've got neighbors now, and now we don't feel safe. They should -- my neighbors should now put in a gated community to protect me." No, if they Page 25 of 37 Page 29 of 745 March 5, 2026 wanted a gated community, they should have put in -- you know, they should have protected themselves with the gates. Our people are -- it almost implies that we're going to have bad people living in our community so we need to be protected from that. That's -- I don't -- I'm sorry, I don't think that's a fair argument. And with that, staff s recommending approval. I think we've met staff with everything they wanted other than we had a nice discussion about Dark Skies, and maybe there will be a change to the Land Development Code in the urban area for -- to oppose Dark Sky lightings. Again, I'm not an expert in lighting, but my gut is, Mr. Schumacher, is because they're lower intensity, I've got more fixtures. I'm assuming more fixtures cost more money than the number of fixtures that it would be today. But again, that's just -- that's -- I'm a math guy. I would think more fixtures would cost more money. But I don't know for a fact. With that, that's our -- that's our response to the comments. We're requesting that you transmit to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with the change to the master plan we discussed and with -- (cell phone rang) -- oh, good, it wasn't me. I didn't think it would be -- but with the changes we've discussed to the -- to the two-story area and with our requested setbacks and with our requested lighting. With that, that's it. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: With that, Michelle, can you hold off a minute? Because I jumped over. He was up at the podium, so I had him do his rebuttal, but I wanted to make sure staff closes out first before we open for discussion and close the public hearing. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. As we had indicated, we were willing to withdraw the request for the rear setbacks with the -- with the reduction of the area adjacent to Castlewood being restricted to the two-story single-family development. I will note that the existing PUD has six deviations. The applicant is not looking for -- to maintain those six deviations. They are looking for three deviations. One deviation is the reduction of your street system from 60 feet to 50 feet. That's a common request within the -- a gated community. A relief from sidewalk and bike lanes on both sides of the street. They're proposing a sidewalk on one side of the street and a bike lane or bike path on the other side of the street. And finally, the third deviation -- or third deviation is for a fragmentation of the preserve -- the preserve locations. Normally we would like to have those preserves in a contiguous arrangement, but based upon our environmental staff s review and their consultant's report, there are pockets of wetland that are more critical, and because of those -- that make up the four preserve areas, staff is supporting all three of those deviations. And with the modifications we discussed, we still would like the consideration for at least the 3,000 Kelvin restriction for lighting. But if the Planning Commission doesn't feel that it's appropriate related to the sealing out this applicant, we would look for some direction or guidance as to whether you wanted us to explore the cost ramifications and the potential for the -- or for the amendment of our LDC to require Dark Skies for development within the urbanized area. Page 26 of 37 Page 30 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. Thank you. Michelle, first of all -- with staff, then, just a follow-up -- and I don't know if Rich has any comments following staff because I had him jump ahead. But you pretty much have concluded your presentation? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yeah. I don't know -- honestly, I don't know from a safety factor. Maybe Mr. Sparrazza could give us some advice if you change -- I don't know what 3,000 Kelvins mean. Honesty, I don't know what that means from a -- is it going to affect the -- the safety factor for cars and others as far as lighting brightness to where am I now putting someone in harm's way because I have a different type of lightbulb? I don't know what that means. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: If I may, Kelvin is a standard used to tell people the, quote, color temperature. If you -- in the old days in your house incandescent lamps were 3,000. They had that warm, yellowish glow. Many people nowadays -- these (indicating) are about 42. Many people nowadays go to what's called 56 or daylight, which is that bright, crisp, white, bluish light. So if they say they're requesting or suggesting a 3,000 Kelvin head that's on top of your 20- or 25-foot pole, that's just the color temperature. The lumens will still be probably 8- to 12-, 13,000 lumens per each head wherever they are. Safety factor, there is none. It's just how it looks when you're driving down. It's going to be kind of that yellowish haze. It's not going to be like the xenon lights on the front of a BMW shining at you. Those are actually 6,000 Kelvins. So it's just visually what it seems like. There is no safety factor brought into it. And almost any head that you put on top of a pole can be modified for lumens for brightness and for color temperature, 3,000, 4,000, 56-. So -- in fact, I was just online looking at them, and they're relatively inexpensive for the head versus the pole. The poles are $2500 each. The heads are 3- or 400. So what you put on top of it is minor. I am not an expert; that should go on the record. It's just simple things that I kind of know about. Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I remember one petition. Didn't Norm Trebilcock or who -- somebody brought in a little demo to show the light. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Norm did. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: And that was discussing the color temperature. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That was color. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Three thousand temperature is more suitable for critters, any type. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: In fact, that's why a lot of people in neighborhoods and most neighborhoods are 3,000 or maybe even 4,000 lighting, and they'll request it on homes also so it doesn't disturb rabbits at night so they can sleep and everything else. There's -- a lot goes into the color temperature. I see you smiling there. MR. YOVANOVICH: There's nothing worse than a cranky rabbit in the morning. I mean, you know. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Paul. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It seems like the only issue is the lighting. And for me, Page 27 of 37 Page 31 of 745 March 5, 2026 it's hard to write an LDC document that covers every situation, which is why we come here. The part that appeals to me is the preserved areas around it. So I would say, first, I don't know how you would change the LDCs as Mr. Yovanovich suggested, but in the case here, I -- I support staffs 3,000K recommendation on the lighting, not so much for the people that live next door, but for the preserve area on the other side. And I guess -- I understand the argument that we don't put it on everybody else, but not everybody has preserve areas adjacent to it. So I support the staff s recommendation. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Before I ask for any other comments, Rich, can you put up that slide that shows the -- it was an enlarged view of -- near Castlewood. Right there. So right there where you have the 15-foot-wide buffer, you're still talking about a product with a zero setback up to the 15-foot buffer; is that correct? MR. YOVANOVICH: It could be. It doesn't mean it will be. It could be. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right along that same stretch, what would be the impact if you increased -- if you made that a 10-foot setback from the 15-foot-wide buffer? Is that going to -- is that a -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, right now we have a 10-foot and a 5-foot. We could go to zero if we wanted to. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. You're still 215 feet. MR. YOVANOVICH: And I'm still -- and they've got their buffer. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. MR. YOVANOVICH: And they've got their lake, and then they've got their house if someone -- if someone who purchased a house along that portion of the project actually wanted to put their house right on top of the landscape buffer -- I'm not saying they will or they won't. Most of the time we experience it is by the lakes where you reduce the buffer. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: This is a relatively small area. I couldn't -- I don't know how many lots you have platted there, but these are restricted to two-story? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And then -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Two-story single-family. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Two-story single-family. MR. YOVANOVICH: Single-family. So it's not even multifamily. It's two-story single-family along that crosshatched area. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Is that in the -- that's now a stipulation, two-story single-family? MR. YOVANOVICH: That was the stipulation we've agreed to. I'll work with Ms. Ashton. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And that's the product they build -- the builder could build just a single -story there if they so choose. MR. YOVANOVICH: Could, could, or two-story, yep. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Michelle. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Chair, I had some concerns about buffers, too. Do you have a concern with buffers? Can you explain to me what your concern is right now? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Well, I was just looking at this side. I heard Brad when he talked about the buffer on a preserve. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: That was on the west side. Page 28 of 37 Page 32 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Here's what he's saying, but a preserve is a buffer, and I don't recall ever -- there is a -- there is a perimeter buffer, correct? MR. YOVANOVICH: There is. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: There's a 15-foot perimeter buffer on the west side, correct? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: West side. MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So that's the buffer to the preserve. I don't know -- I have no other -- I don't see any other need to put an additional buffer on the west side. I was talking about this adjacent to Castlewood just being a little more restrictive on what could be allowed there, that's all, so they would have a little more space. MR. YOVANOVICH: If you want to take away the ability to go to zero along Castlewood, we'll agree to that. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I would -- I would -- MR. YOVANOVICH: We'll say that the ability to go to zero along landscape buffers does not apply to the portion by Castlewood. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I think that's a great proposal. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: I don't understand that. MR. YOVANOVICH: What I'm saying -- right now our -- our land development standard says our setback is five feet for accessory structures, 10 feet for principal structures, with the ability to go down to zero feet for both principal and accessory structures when we're adjacent to an open area, a lake, or a landscape buffer. If you're saying you're not comfortable with our ability to go down to the zero adjacent to the landscape buffer along Castlewood's boundary, we're fine with saying we cannot reduce the rear setback to zero in that portion of the PUD. The other areas is -- that's the high school. Do you really care? And then over here is the landscape buffer would be adjacent to preserve land. So I think if you're concerned that we're somehow getting too close to the Castlewood residences by doing that, then we can limit -- we won't be able to reduce our rear setback in that area. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: And that is my concern. MR. YOVANOVICH: Then we'll agree to that as an additional condition as part of the project. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Okay. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Chair, if I may. Rich, I almost have to go against you in this. What true value is an extra five or 10 feet when we have 215 feet between the lot line and the next property owner? MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't disagree, but you know what -- you know, I'm a lover, not a fighter. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: I know, you're trying to get out of here. MR. YOVANOVICH: You know, I just -- I don't think it adds much, but if that's something that will make Commissioner McLeod a little bit more comfortable along Castlewood, we're happy to add that condition. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Actually, the builder -- property would -- build some homes there, they would probably be far more desirable. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Right, exactly. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: With that, then, I know we're at our break time, but I Page 29 of 37 Page 33 of 745 March 5, 2026 think we're close to finishing. So if we think we can pound down for a few more minutes, we'll do that. So I close the public hearing. I open for Board discussion. Note that we do have to approve this as the EAC as well, so we'll need a vote for both the EAC because of -- specifically because of the preserve requirements. And in the discussion piece, I just want to ask if -- my piece. If Tim Hall could come up a minute, because I want to ask him -- put on the record, I'm sure -- because it will come up on the -- in the Board of County Commissioners. Brad talked about the scrub in the north area. In all your review through your environmental assessment, could you explain, you did preserve what needed to be preserved and what was protected and what was identified as jurisdictional wetlands. Brad was looking at this scrub area in the north. I have no idea, is that something that's of significant importance? To him it is, but from a standpoint of preserve. MR. HALL: There is remnant preserve -- remnant scrub up in that north corner. Remember, though, that this property was completely cleared -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yes. MR. HALL: -- at one time for the mining operation. So most of what's grown up in here is secondary growth with the -- with the exception of those big preserve cypress dome areas. The mining occurred around those domes. So what's there -- while the habitat is there, it was pretty heavily impacted by off -road use. There were ATVs and motorcycles and Jeeps and everything else that ran through this area for years, so a lot of that area was adversely impacted. And in looking at that versus the preservation of wetland areas, when we have to go through the regulatory agencies, they would prefer us to build in upland areas and preserve wetland areas wherever possible. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Correct. MR. HALL: So we made the internal call to concentrate the development in those upland areas where we could so that we could preserve more of the wetland areas. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Good. Thanks. For the record, that was Tim Hall. I don't know if he stated it. MR. HALL: I'm sorry. Tim Hall with Turrell, Hall & Associates. Sorry. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I have one other question. And maybe Mike Sawyer or Lorraine could address this. The old rail right-of-way, is that now identified as eventually going to be the pathway up through to Lee County? So now we're talking about bicycles and other things going up along what was originally a dedicated right-of-way for a railroad, which hasn't been there in years. But now we're -- we are talking about public still passing through what was considered a -- and the public does have access to the Conservation Collier. So is that -- is that going to be now a right-of-way for the eventual bike lane or whatever all the way up to Lee County? MS. LANTZ: So Lorraine Lantz, Transportation Planning. We are in -- excuse me, sorry. So the BERT Trail, it's, I believe, Bonita Estero Rails to Trails project. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. MS. LANTZ: That is what's coming -- what's looking for the right-of-way to purchase it from the railroad. I believe the railroad still owns it, and there's some Page 30 of 37 Page 34 of 745 March 5, 2026 negotiations to acquire it. But it could be a rail corridor all the way up to Bonita and Estero. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Where the public would pretty much have easy access through there? MS. LANTZ: Correct. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. That's what I thought. Thanks, Lorraine. All right. With that, are there any other comments? Do we have any comments/recommendations from my colleagues? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Note that we are voting as the EAC as well as the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Two separate. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: We can -- two separate votes we can take, yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, I'd like to make the motion -- you're going to have to help me with some of the other changes. But I'd like to make the motion we accept and approve the petition with the exception of the 3,000 -- add the 3,000 requirement that staff recommended. And there were several other amendments, which I didn't write all down, that we need to get in the record that staff agreed with. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Second was the rear -yard setback that was being asked by staff would be eliminated except for the portion right near Castlewood that was identified. You're going to change that to accommodate an additional -- was it 10 feet or five feet? MR. YOVANOVICH: No, no. What we're going to do is eliminate the ability to go to zero. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Zero in that area. MR. YOVANOVICH: Staff agrees with the 10-foot principal and the 5-foot accessory as well as the ability to go to zero except -- in certain areas, except for Castlewood. You can't go to zero by Castlewood. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And the elimination of the third amendment, which was a request for Dark Skies, but with the expectation, as proposed by Paul, that the light mixtures would be 3,000? COMMISSIONER SHEA: 3,000K. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: 3,000K, which I think is -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Max, max 3,000. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: 3,000 Kelvin. Mr. Kelvin. So that is the standing -- that's the -- I think we covered everything, then, on the -- on the recommendation. Do I hear a second? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Well, the staff had reduction in street width. (Simultaneous crosstalk.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Those are all in the stipulation already. They're all -- they were asked as deviations, so... COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: So do we need to recognize the two-story max height adjacent to Castlewood, as Rich had -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: We already did that, but we can state for the record again it's a restriction, yes. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Second. Page 31 of 37 Page 35 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Second. And -- COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Can we have a discussion? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah. Go ahead, please. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Going back to the lighting, can I get a feel for what my colleagues think about that, the 3,000K? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I don't see a big deal. The 3,000K is -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: It's softer than bright light. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: It's a little softer. I would love to see some come back in the -- in the LDC amendment sometime to discuss this, because it seems to be a popular issue, but I don't see it as a great financial burden. MR. YOVANOVICH: It's a different light bulb, right? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Different light bulb. MR. YOVANOVICH: Is that what you're telling me, it's a different bulb? COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Many times it's selectable when you either purchase it, or there's literally a switch on the head of the fixtures when you put it onto the pole. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. Because I know in my community, we went to all the -- got rid of the incandescents and went to the -- what are they, LED. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: LED. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: LEDs, which are really brighter in a lot of ways, yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Did that answer your question? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Did that answer your question? COMMISSIONER McLEOD: A couple people. So everybody else is -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I'll go with it. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: -- okay with that? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Paul made a recommendation, and I'm good. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Okay. And it sounds like now the petitioner is warming up to that. COMMISSIONER SHEA: He'll be okay with that. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: He went from 3K to 5K. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm a little -- I'm a little yellow about it. I'm cautious. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: You're warm. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm warm. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So with that, we have a motion and a second. All in favor, say aye. COMMISSIONER COLUCCI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Aye. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Aye. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Any opposed, like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: We have no opposition. It passes unanimously. MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: But there is an opposition, so I'm sure this will be -- Page 32 of 37 Page 36 of 745 March 5, 2026 from the standpoint of the community, this will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners as well. I encourage you to attend. MR. EWING: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: So with that -- so do we have any other closing comments? COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Yeah. I had some new business I wanted to touch on. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: New business. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: First of those being some really great news out of District 3, because Gulf Coast High School basketball won their district and also went to semifinals, and that was the first time in the school's history. They've been there for almost 30 years. Coach Grillo and his team really deserve the props on that because there was zero media coverage to highlight these fine young men and their varsity team and their season. That's the good. The bad is I wanted to ask the Commission for their thoughts on, and also ask Mr. Bosi to jump in on this. I had a conversation with the assistant fire chief down in Marco, and we were discussing rental boats. And I know that the boat clubs have a program they put their boaters through in order for them to operate a vessel, a powered vessel, but these half -day or full -day boat rentals have basically zero. So I would put it to you like this: If you let somebody rent a car, they have to have a driver's license. Well, if there's no boater safety, which in my conversations with the assistant fire chief, the amount of calls that they got on the water due to people that don't know how to operate a vessel is outstanding. I contacted FWC to try to get some of their data. I'm waiting to hear back from them. And I'm going to contact the Sheriffs Office and see what type of data they have. I can tell you, being on the water almost every weekend or every other weekend, if I see rental boats -- which you can always tell because their fenders are hanging out. You know those little things that go on the side? COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Yeah, yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: And they're usually going too fast through a "no wake" zone or they're on the wrong side of the channel. I can understand why there is so many emergency calls for those actions. I think that something needs to be done because it's -- you're giving somebody a 3,000-pound vessel in the water that's under power, and that can hurt, harm, and maim other people. So, Mike, I don't know if there's ever been discussion on some type of ordinance that would require them to do some type of boater education before they're allowed to take it out. I could -- I can understand the enforcement would be tough, but, like, if the County got a complaint and they went, and let's say there was an accident where somebody was injured, but that rental company had proof that, oh, no, this -- the operator had taken -- they're a very simple course. I mean, you can go online -- and the Coast Guard one is super simple. You read through it, and at least if you read through it, you know which side of the channel to drive on. But has there ever been any discussion from the County's side on something of that nature? MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. I have expertise in land use. Page 33 of 37 Page 37 of 745 March 5, 2026 Boat navigation requirements -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Gotcha. MR. BOSI: I could reach out to Coastal Zone to see if there's any programs or any -- has any -- been discussion. I could -- and report back to you. But in terms of my specific knowledge of that, outside of the area. They draw me in. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Okay. It would not be in the LDC. It would have to be codified in the Code of Law and Ordinances, and that would be an issue going before the Board of County Commissioners. It's something we wouldn't do. It would have to be a separate initiative. I know, Tim, you're an expert. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Yeah. MR. HALL: Yeah. For the record, Tim Hall with Turrell, Hall & Associates again. I was just going to say that the State does have a certification requirement. If you were born after I believe it's 1988 -- it's in the '80s sometime. But if you were born after 1988, you are supposed to have a boater education certificate or certification in order to operate anything more than 10 horsepower. I don't know if the rental companies actually check for that or anything. And like I said, I don't think it's a -- it's a super robust type of certification, but I know that the State does have that requirement in place. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Excellent. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah. I rent a lot, and there is an age requirement. I had a course 30 years ago, but they just check my age and the driver's license, and I don't have to take it. So that's how most of us get around it. Now, I have experience running boats. But I don't have to have it if I'm over a certain age. So to your point, that's not very secure. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Gotcha. Yes, sir. You had a question. MR. REICHERT: I'm a member of Freedom Boat Club. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Sir -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Come up to the mic for me, please. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The podium, the mic. Terri, we're wearing your fingers out, but... MR. REICHERT: Jim Reichert. I'm a member of Freedom Boat Club. And they require you to do a boater safety class, and then they take you out and test you before they'll rent you a boat. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Well, I'm not talking about the boat clubs. I'm talking about -- as you've seen -- I'm sure you've seen on the water. MR. REICHERT: Oh, yeah. You see everything. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: You see the half -day or full-dayers that they're renting from a marina, and it -- either they leave their boats on the beach when the tide goes out, and then they're stuck there, or they're in the mangroves, or there's some other issue. So that's really kind of what we're getting towards is that safety aspect of it because it's being -- from what I'm hearing, it's definitely becoming an issue. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I mean, I think that kind of recommendation would be great. The Board would have to direct staff, but that would go -- Heidi could probably -- would go in the Code of Laws and Ordinances. It would have to be an ordinance -- not part of the LDC, but it would be Board of County Commissioners implementing an ordinance. Page 34 of 37 Page 38 of 745 March 5, 2026 MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Yes, that's correct. There may also be some preemptions where -- I'm not sure about that -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The State? MS. ASHTON-CICKO: -- at this time. Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right, thanks. Anybody else, comments? COMMISSIONER McLEOD: I have one thing. When I do these site inspections before our meetings, oftentimes I have to go through a guard gate, and I will tell them, "Hi, I'm on the Planning Commission. I'm here to visit the site that's coming before us," and the guard doesn't really -- they're like, "Who? What?" So I was wondering if we could -- could we have business cards that say we're on the Planning Commission so we have some authority in entering these gated communities, which is most all of them? COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: Badges. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Or a badge. MS. LOCKHART: Almost like a -- an ID card or something. COMMISSIONER PETSCHER: I never got one. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Oh, I have a badge. I'm special. COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Yeah, a badge would be good, just to give us some sort of authority. Because going to Imperial Lakes -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: What? What? Wait a second. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: You could buy one on eBay if you want. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: It's got a scanner on it, too. You can just go all over the place? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: I don't know. I'd have to defer to staff. I don't ever remember the issue. Typically -- but a lot of communities at CDDs, they typically have to let you in, because they're public -- technically public roads, but -- COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Wait a second. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: I have a badge. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: -- I don't know. You have a badge because you're on the Planning Commission? COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: I was given a badge for Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Mr. Bosi, I am disappointed. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Do I remember right? MR. BOSI: I'm not aware of any badge program for commission members. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Okay. MR. BOSI: I can look into and speak with our administration about business cards or badge alternatives. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: I want a badge on a zip cord. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: That's what I have. MR. BOSI: I have one of those. COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: Now you're going to make me -- MR. YOVANOVICH: You can get one at the Halloween store. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: I'll make it myself Don't worry about it. MR. BOSI: I have to tell you that this doesn't really give me any privileges. Page 35 of 37 Page 39 of 745 March 5, 2026 CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Right, the ID card. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: I'll make sure of it from here on out. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: All right. Well, with that, I'll ask Mr. Bosi to come back to us on a recommendation, but I would also ask that in the future we look at staff addressing this issue with Dark Skies and what needs to be required as far as an LDC amendment, because we need to address that. MR. BOSL• Well, I was just speaking with Mr. Johnson, our LDC manager, and he was asking -- I said I was going to seek the clarification. So we'll do some research, try to get some cost estimates, try to see what the difference is, see in terms of the specifics that are contained within the Dark Skies, and just to bring a full report back to the Planning Commission. MR. YOVANOVICH: On that -- on that issue -- and I know you already took the vote, and I'll deal with this at the Board, but I'm assuming the intention was not to require us to put more fixtures in. You just wanted us to put in a different lightbulb? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Correct. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: But was it your intention if -- to meet safety requirements, we would need to put more fixtures in, was your intention to require us to put more fixtures in -- CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: No. It would be -- MR. YOVANOVICH: -- because you went with the -- went with the lighting? And I know you already took the vote. I'm just asking for clarification so I know what to do. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: My recommendation would be if it's a safety issue, you increase the brightness. MR. YOVANOVICH: We just don't have to require -- we just don't [sic] have to meet the 3,000 Kelvins? CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Correct. And I think if I were to rephrase that, we would strongly encourage 3,000 lumen -- or Kelvin. COMMISSIONER SCHUMACKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: And if it's a safety issue, I don't -- I mean, I could see going brighter. Yes, Mike. MR. BOSI: Like I said, we have the Dark Sky requirements for most of the developments that happen out east, and I don't think we've ever had any safety issues identified with the SDP but, if so, we will adjust. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: The biggest complaint I ever got was -- in the community was when -- with the cane frogs that we have here, people who take their dogs out, they want the streetlights so they can make sure they see the cane frogs so their dogs don't -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Die. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: That's been the biggest issue, but... COMMISISONER SPARRAZZA: They also have a thing called a flashlight. CHAIRMAN SCHMITT: Yeah, I know. Terri, thank you for exceeding your -- we're in 20 minutes big time of your time Page 36 of 37 Page 40 of 745 March 5, 2026 there, but thank you. With that, I conclude the Planning Commission. Thank you for your time. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:48 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JOSEPH K. SCHMITT, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF VERITEXT BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR-C, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 37 of 37 Page 41 of 745 4/2/2026 Item # 9.A ID# 2026-533 PL20250006066 - Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict (GMPA) — An ordinance of the board of county commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Future Land Use Map and map series by changing the land use designation of property from Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street Residential Subdistrict to allow 36 multifamily townhouse dwelling units, with affordable housing. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW, east of I-75 in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of f4.18 acres; furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Commerce; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Kathryn Grigsby, Planner III) [Companion item to RPUD- PL202500060681 ATTACHMENTS: 1. PL20250006066-38164120005-Golden Gate @ 6oth St. Residential Subdistrict -STAFF REPORT (3-23-26) 2. Ordinance - 031326 3. Applicant Justification 4. Ad Request (003) Page 42 of 745 _e) Collier County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: APRIL 2, 2026 SUBJECT: PL20250006066/SMALL-SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO CREATE THE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60Tx ST. RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT, (Companion to PUDZ- PL20250006068) Kathryn Grigsby, Comprehensive Planner III ELEMENTS: URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT MIXED USE DISTRICT AGENT/APPLICANT: Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Sr. VP Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr. Mgr. Bowman Bowman 950 Encore Way 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Naples, FL 34110 Applicant: Stephanie Karol Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Owner: Anna R. Mongillo 103 Beechwood Drive Southington, CT 06489 The subject property comprises ± 4.18 acres in size and is located at the southwest corner of 62nd Street SW and 601h Street SW, with a portion located at the southwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 601h Street SW, and east of I-75 in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East; also identified as Golden Gate Estates Unit 30 Tract 49, parcel ID # 38164120005 Page 43 of 745 PL20250006066 Bathey Lei -T;nldeji ate 1'1s;N l' IrI f+ PROJECT LOCATION T Ba O nt s BeL►i I1 e BIND D ll*u is X Location Map Bai hey LN P.u.. J. ` P.V_S.V- TJJ. Py. Golden ate PKWV LjULUE ------------- 62nd ST W .� 49 60 P� V �L� ppff SITE LOCATION E s� 01 C5' Petition Number: PL20250006066 Zoning Map 2 Page 44 of 745 PL20250006066 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element, specifically to create the Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict, to allow the construction of an affordable housing project at a maximum of 36 multifamily dwelling units (8.63 dwelling units per acre) that are build -to -rent -to -own. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subiect Property: The ±4.18 acre subject site, currently undeveloped, is located along the southwest corner of 62nd Street SW and 601h Street SW, and east of I-75. The subject property is designated on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element, as Estates Mixed -Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; Zoned Estates, with a Corridor Management Overlay. Institutional and Residential single-family Land Use, Collier County Behavioral Health Center (CFPUD), Conditional Use Subdistrict, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict, David Lawrence Center across Golden Gate Parkway. East: Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; Zoned Estates, with a Corridor Management Overlay. Across 60th Street, Institutional and Residential Land Use, in addition to undeveloped lots. South: Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; Zoned Estates. Residential single-family Land Use. West: Future Land Use Designation: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; Zoned Estates. Residential Land Use, in addition to undeveloped lots. In summary, the property is bordered by residential land uses with sporadic undeveloped lots, and limited institutional uses to the north and east within Estates zoned land. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: During the late 1950's, the Gulf American Land Corporation began platting low -density 5-acre lots and subsequently developed the Golden Gate area, which covers 173 square miles (I 11,000 acres). The Estates were later downzoned in 1974 into low -density single-family parcels, resulting in a density of one (1) dwelling unit per 2.25 (legal conforming) acres. In 1991, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) was adopted (Ordinance 91-15). Recognizing the unique and natural characteristics of the area, the GGAMP restudy completed in 2019 divided the Golden Gate Estates into three areas: Golden Gate City (north of I-75 between Collier Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard), Rural Golden Gate Estates (east of Collier Boulevard/951), and the Urban Golden Gate Estates (UGGE) (west of Collier Boulevard/951). The subject property in this petition is f4.18 acres of undeveloped land located in the Urban Golden Gate Estates, Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Collier County records indicate the property Page 45 of 745 PL20250006066 was platted in 1965 and was dimensioned at 330 feet by 680 feet. In 2003, the Florida Department of Transportation issued monetary compensation for a legal taking for right-of-way purposes along the northern boundary of the subject site. Currently, the property is 330 feet by 545 feet along the western boundary. On the west side of the subject site, 4 lots are legal non- conforming, dating back to the following years: 1975, 1984, 1987, and 1993. To the east, across 601h Street SW, there is a church occupying 5.16 acres, with a portion of the lot undeveloped since 1976 (parcel 38165200005). Immediately bordering the site on the southern boundary is a single-family home with a separate guest house, situated on 2.73 acres (parcel 38163880003), developed in 2005. Across Golden Gate Parkway to the north is an institutional subdistrict that includes the David Lawrence Center, spanning 8.1 acres (parcel 38163640007), and a church on 4.96 acres (parcel 38165120004). According to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy (GGAMP-R) of 2017, the UGGE was built -out leaving 14% of undeveloped lots available for development. As a result, beginning in the 1990s, the State of Florida began purchasing land in the South Golden Gate Estates to preserve ecologically significant areas and to restore watershed degradation caused by land development and canal dredging. Over time, the Urban Golden Gate Estates has experienced a higher concentration of dwelling units according to the White Paper from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy (GGAMP- R) of 2017. The focus of the restudy centered on complementary land uses, economic vitality, housing affordability, transportation, and environmental stewardship. The data obtained in the restudy were solicited through surveys and public workshops held in the community, drawing feedback from over 330 public stakeholders. This process provided the community an opportunity to draft a specific vision statement to be used as a guide for future policies and objectives for the UGGE. The vision statement for the Urban Estates, drafted during the restudy, was: "Golden Gate Western Estates is a low -density, large -lot residential neighborhood in a natural setting with convenient access to the coastal area. " Since over 30% of the population has lived there for over 20 years, the consensus was to maintain the area as -is. The subject site is located within the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element, in the Residential Estates Subdistrict, which, according to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, is intended to provide "low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses... Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non -conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses....Multifamily dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited. " Under the Conditional Uses Subdistrict in the Urban GGAMP, there are special provisions for the Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard location. More specifically, "no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses, except within the Institutional Subdistrict. " The applicant in this petition is not proposing a conditional use and, conversely, has proposed a new subdistrict that would allow 36 affordable multifamily residential units for built -to -rent -to - own. According to the Urban Golden Gate Estates of the GGAMP, Goal 4 strives to `provide for a safe and efficient... local roadway network, " and Objective 4.1 seeks to "increase linkages within the local road system ...limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors... shortening vehicular trips, and increasing road system capacity. " Policy 5.1 of Collier County's Transportation Element (TE) ensures that the County Commissioners shall not approve any rezone or Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment petition that would "directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR. " As previously stated, the subject site is located at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW. In its current layout at this intersection, Golden Gate Parkway has 6 lanes of traffic, 3 turning lanes, and a median opening allowing vehicles to turn north/south along 60th 4 Page 46 of 745 PL20250006066 Street SW and east/west along Golden Gate Parkway. Due to the location of the subject site abutting Golden Gate Parkway and within the Corridor Management Overlay, LDC Section 4.02.24 states that "Two-way ingress and egress shall be a minimum of 330 feet from the nearest street intersection ... if a property abuts a side street except that if a property is 5 acres or less in size, access shall be limited to the side street. " According to the preliminary master plan, the proposed two-way entrance is at the southeastern corner of the subject site along the local side street, 60th Street SW. Neighboring residents attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) expressed concern and opposition to the increase in vehicular traffic accessing the site from the local residential street. The applicant is proposing to add 36 multifamily residential units, contributing an estimated minimum of 36 vehicles to the neighboring 16 single-family homes with direct access to the local street. In addition, the residential home bordering the subject site to the south is concerned about their children's safety due to the proposed driveway's proximity and the reduced 25-foot buffer/setback deviation. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS: The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was completed by JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., on August 12, 2025, and revised on December 3, 2025. The report utilized the Multifamily land use code (LUC 220) to provide traffic estimates for the subject site, concluding that the proposed project will generate "15 vehicles per hour (vph) and 19 new two-way trips during the AM and PMpeak hours." Generating less than "50 net new trips ends during the weekday highest peak hour" is defined as a small-scale study per Collier County's Government Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines. Collier County's Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) 2024 also found that the percentage change in peak hour directional volume from 2023 for the segment of Golden Gate Parkway between I-75 and Santa Barbara saw less than a (+/_) 5% change. Although the AUIR does not track local streets, the traffic impacts for this project are found to be "di minimis" pursuant to Florida Statute Section 163.3180(6) and Transportation Engineering Policy 5.2. Therefore, it is assumed that the traffic impact of the proposed project will not exceed the current capacity of the adjacent road network. COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED PLAN -HOUSING DATA: The 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan (CP) for Collier County provides an analysis of the available housing stock —both rental and owner -occupied. According to the report, the American Community Survey (ACS) estimated that in 2019, Collier County had a total of 222,289 housing units. Of the total housing units, 40.7% (90,552) were 1-unit detached single-family homes, 6.8% were 1-unit attached, 20.1% (44,174) were 2-9 multifamily units, 26.9%(59,697) were 10-20 multifamily units, and 5.6% (12,499) were mobile or manufactured homes. The ACS report estimated that the county's median home prices have increased by 44.8% between 2010 and 2019, while the median rental rate increased by 48.3%. In addition, data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Comprehensive Housing Affordable Strategy (CHAS) concluded that Collier County had over 28,000 households spending more than 30% of their income on housing costs. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HUD) considers households spending more than 30% of their income on housing to be "cost - burdened." Per the CP, approximately "9, 545 of renters in Collier County have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income, while a total of 14,685 of homeowners have cost burdens greater than 30% but less than 50% of the Area Median Income. " (AMI) In Collier County, at 80% AMI, the CP reports that over 28,000 households (renter- and owner -occupied) have a cost burden greater than 30%. Page 47 of 745 PL20250006066 Housing Cost Data The county's Community and Human Services (CHS) Division is a local agency tasked with finding solutions to housing affordability. In 2023, CHS stated that approximately "35% of jobs in Collier County pay less than $35k per year and 58% pay less than $45k per year," with rents averaging $2,230 and housing prices averaging $571,500. The 2026 Poverty Guidelines published by HUD reported that a household of four making $33,000 is considered at 100% of the poverty threshold. Average Median Income (AMI) Data Furthermore, a Collier County resident making minimum wage and working 40-hours per week, 52 weeks a year needs to work a minimum of 124 hours per week to afford the 2020 Fair Market Rent ($1,381) for a 2-bedroom apartment according to the CP. Furthermore, the CP identified a lack of affordable housing in Collier County that more directly affects "low -and moderate - income levels, seniors, people with disabilities, single heads of households, and young adults, " with the strongest need for households earning less than 50% AMI. In addition, "a significant lack of affordable housing exists particularly for the approximately one in four households that are at the low or very -low-income levels [6,273 households], " per the CP report. Collier County's Affordable Housing Commitment/Inventory List for January 2026 showed 35,055 total residential units, with 12,256 being offered at differing AMI levels of affordability. The County's Quarterly Rental Apartment Inventory Survey from January 2026 indicated the average rental rate for a 2-bedroom 2 bath is $1,964. It also stated the following developments, offering a limited number of affordable units within the development: • 3 developments offering 100% Fair Market Rate • 25 developments offering some units at 81%-120%AMI • 43 developments offering some units at 51 %-80% AMI • 14 developments offering some units at 30%-50% AMI The petitioner is proposing 30 years of restricted pricing for rentals at 80%-120% of AMI, and, if purchased, 120%-140% of AMI. This would amount to a 1-4 person household making a salary of $63,680-$90,880 at 80% AMI for a rental unit ranging from $1,705-$3,544. At 120%-140% AMI, a buyer would need an income between $95,520 and $159,040 to qualify for the same household size. Although the residents in attendance at the NIM voiced their support for affordable housing in the community, the location, density, and street access onto 60th Street SW within the low -density Urban Estates are the overarching contentious points preventing them from supporting the project. APPLICANT JUSTIFICATION: According to the applicant, page 86 of the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan for Collier County stated, "There is not a sufficient supply for low- and moderate -income households in Collier County " and "A significant lack of affordable housing existing particularly for the approximately one in four households that are the low or very -low income levels. " Furthermore, the applicant feels this housing contribution at 80%-140% AMI will "help the county achieve the overarching goals of the Consolidated Plan" which is "to provide decent housing by... increasing the availability of affordable housing" and "To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low- and moderate -income residents throughout the County, [and] increased housing opportunities " (Consolidated Plan, pg. 112). 6 Page 48 of 745 PL20250006066 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS: On the other hand, the county has an obligation to meet the needs of all residents within the community. This is being accomplished through initiatives funded by public and private partnerships, which promote the development of affordable housing units at various AMI levels. For this project, the Collier County Land Trust (unaffiliated with Collier County government) is providing financial backing and management of the aforementioned affordable housing units. Since this project proposes that the developer has the first right of refusal, this ensures that affordable pricing will be maintained for future owners or renters for the next 30 years. The applicant has provided justification for the proposed amendment to allow multifamily on a residentially zoned parcel by identifying the need for affordable housing stock within Collier County when demonstrating the cost -burdens of housing expenses imposed on both renters and homeowners. In addition, the ability to tie into public water and sewer eliminates the need for on -site septic and well water, relieving the neighboring properties from competing for resources. It has also been shown that the local road network can support the addition of vehicular traffic resulting from this development. While there are existing affordable housing developments in Collier County, the need for additional affordable housing remains. Although there are sites available within the county that could support this type of infill development, the Comprehensive Planning staff believes the proposed site provides housing to an area that would benefit from its location. The proximity of the proposed development to major highways and Activity Centers provides future residents with a link to employment opportunities. Comprehensive Planning staff finds the creation of a subdistrict for multifamily use within the Urban Golden Gate Estates —to allow uses identified within the subdistrict textto be consistent with the goals and policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, as well as the Florida state statutes listed below. CRITERIA FOR GMP AMENDMENTS FLORIDA STATUTES: Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary, as indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Supporting data or summaries may be used to aid in determining compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology used in data collection, or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted, may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include Page 49 of 745 PL20250006066 whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8. Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: Page 50 of 745 PL20250006066 a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use, considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Section 163.3187 Florida Statutes: [qualifications to follow the small-scale GMPA process] Process for adoption of small-scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small-scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises f4.18 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small-scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with the small-scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3) and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subjectproperty is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs that were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES The applicant conducted a NIM on November 3, 2025, at the New Hope Ministries, located at 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL. Robert J. Mulhere and Ellen Summers, the agents, were prepared to conduct the meeting with a presentation on the proposed RPUD Rezone and Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) application; however, there were 19 public attendees, in addition to the agents, their staff, and the applicant. A PowerPoint presentation was provided to attendees. All public attendees were residential neighbors of the proposed development and expressed opposition to the project's location due to density and associated vehicular traffic, but supported the concept of providing affordable housing within Collier County. The public attendees posed questions regarding the following: drainage and capacity of the canal, traffic congestion along 601h Street SW, retaining native vegetation along the southern buffer, off -site conservation mitigation, drinking water supply, sewer connections, on -site retention capabilities, flooding, impacts to property values, and safety for kids. A copy of the NIM Summary, sign -in sheet, and NIM PowerPoint presentation are included in attachments. Page 51 of 745 PL20250006066 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • An existing conflict exists in the proposed subdistrict text and the Estates Designation of the GGAMP, which prohibits multifamily uses and prohibits density above 1 unit per 2.25 acres along this segment of Golden Gate Parkway. The proposed amendment resolves the conflict. • The subject is approximately'/2 mile to the west of Golden Gate City, which is designated Urban and allows higher density multifamily development. • The proposed changes are compatible with nearby institutional uses based upon the high level at which GMPAs are reviewed. • As allowed by the CCME and LDC, the petitioner is opting to provide off -site mitigation rather than retain a portion of the on -site native vegetation. • The traffic volume along the segment of Golden Gate Parkway abutting the subject site is 0.21 %, which, per the TIS, is distributed as: 7 vehicles per hour per day going west (peak hour and peak direction), and 4 vehicles per hour going west (peak hour and non -peak direction). • Traffic volume for the local street, 601h Street SW, is not tracked in the county AUIR report. • The vehicular trips to the subject site are found to be insignificant according to the traffic study provided. The existing roadway network appears to support proposed changes to trip generations at the subject site. • Collier County has an existing unmet need of affordable housing inventory. • The Collier County Consolidated Plan 2021-2025 analysis identified a need for affordable housing in Collier County. • The appropriateness of the location is met through the close proximity to I-75, which offers convenient access to job centers throughout the county. • Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Environmental Findings: The subject property is ±4.18 acres. The Environmental Services Staff verified the acreage of native vegetation on site during the review of the PUD PL20250006068 for the project. The subject property is currently zoned Estates. The property contains 3.68 acres of native vegetation, which will require 0.37 acres to be placed in preservation. The proposed GMP amendment has no effect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) regarding the protection of native vegetation; the preservation requirement is 0.37 acres (10% of 3.68 acres). Native vegetation standards will be met off -site in accordance with the standards established by CCME Policy 6.1.2. and section 3.05.07.1-1 of the LDC. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Planning Findings: A Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by JMB Transportation Engineering, dated December 3, 2025, was submitted as part of this petition. Transportation Planning staff reviewed the TIS and the petition for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan using the current 2024 AUIR. Transportation Planning Staff finds the TIS to be sufficient and has no objections to the Transmittal of this GMPA petition. Housing Policy & Economic Development Findings: The development proposes to include 100% of the 36 residential units as " Affordable "Rent -to - Own. While the units are rented, 19 will be restricted to households at and below 80% of 10 Page 52 of 745 PL20250006066 Area Median Income (AMI). The remaining 17 will be restricted to households at and below 120% of Area Median Income (AMI). If homes are subsequently sold to existing renters, they will be limited to 140% of AMI. If homes are sold to new buyers, they will be limited to 120% of AMI. For reference, the 2025 Florida Housing Finance Corporation Income Limits are: 2025 Collier County Income and Rent Limits for Affordable Housing Income Limit by Number of People in Unit Rent Lim it by Number of Bed rooms in Unit 2Q25 PercentageA Medan In- Category Name 1 2 4 1 2 3 Collier 30% Extremely LGV! $ 23,880 $ 27,270 $ 34,080 $ 639 $ 767 $ 886 County 50% very Low $ 39,800 $ 45,450 $ 56,800 $ 1,065 $ 1,278 $ 1,476 Median 60% rya $ 47,760 $ 54,540 $ 68,160 $ 1,278 $ 1,534 $ 1,772 Household Income 8090 100% Low Median $ $ 63,680 79,600 $ 72,720 $ 90,900 $ $ 90,880 113,600 $ $ 1,705 2,131 $ 2,046 $ 2,557 $ $ 2,363 2,953 $113,600 120% Moderate $ 95,520 5 109,080 $ 136,320 $ 2,557 $ 3,069 $ 3,544 140% Gap $ 111,440 5 127,260 $ 159,040 $ 2,983 $ 3,580 $ 4,135 A Restrictive Covenant will be recorded on the affordable units, requiring them to be initially and subsequently rented or sold to qualifying households for a period of 30 years from the Certificate of Occupancy for each unit. The need for affordable housing units is great in Collier County, as the University of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing reports that there are currently 51,368 cost -burdened households in Collier County, with 25,687 of those spending more than 50% of their monthly income on housing expenses. The Median home sales price in Collier County is $570,000 (Single Family Homes- $750,000, Condos- $435,000), NABOR Market Report, Dec 2025. Prices in Naples have increased by 73% since pre-COVID levels. 63% of sales are cash deals, according to the NABOR Market Report, Feb 2025. The Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI), Market Rate Rent for December 2025 was $2,709, University of Florida Schimberg Center for Housing Studies. Approval of this development will assist Collier County in addressing the continued need for affordable housing. Utility Findings: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the Golden Gate Wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable GMP goals 11 Page 53 of 745 PL20250006066 and objectives regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for the jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff have concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments to minimize impact to the Level of Service (LOS). LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this Staff Report on March 16, 2025. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the proposed Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict PL20250006066 to the Board of County Commissioners to approve and adopt, and transmit to the Florida Department of Commerce and other statutorily required agencies. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the May 26, 2026, BCC meeting. 12 Page 54 of 745 ORDINANCE NO. 2026- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89- 05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW 36 MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS, WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND 60TH STREET, EAST OF I-75 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.184: ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20250006066] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County Community Land Trust requested an amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street Residential Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small -Scale Amendment; and [25-CMP-01249/2007434/1184 Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA-PL20250006066 3/13/25 1 of 3 Page 55 of 745 WHEREAS the Subdistrict property is not located in a rural area of opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPQ on considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small-scale amendment to the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Future Land Use Map and Map Series in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after Board adoption. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. [25-CMP-01249/2007434/1184 Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA-PL20250006066 3/13/25 2 of 3 Page 56 of 745 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2026. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk Dan Kowal, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [25-CMP-01249/2007434/1184 Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA-PL20250006066 3/13/25 3 of 3 Page 57 of 745 Exhibit A PL20250006066 Golden Gate Parkway/601h St. Residential Subdistrict Exhibit A FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Goals, Objectives and Policies B. Land Use Designation Description Section 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. Estates - Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict 6. Naples Senior Center Community Facility Subdistrict 7. Golden Gate Parkway/60' St. Residential Subdistrict C. List of Maps Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) — Interchange Activity Center and Mixed Use Subdistrict Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict Naples Senior Center Community Facility Subdistrict Golden Gate Parkway/60' Street Residential Subdistrict GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Page 116 Words underlined are added; words stf+*skthfetigk are deletions Page 58 of 745 Exhibit A PL20250006066 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES — MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Temple Shalom Community Facility Subdistrict 6. Naples Senior Center Community Facility Subdistrict 7. Golden Gate Parkway/60t' Street Residential Subdistrict B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non -conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non -conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units, duplexes, and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation, except within the Golden Gate Parkway/601}i St. Residential Subdistrict. A. Estates — Mixed -Use District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 7. Golden Gate Parkway/601 St. Residential Subdistrict The Golden Gate Parkwav/60th St. Residential Subdistrict is approximately 4.18 acres in size and is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60' Street South, approximately 1,700 feet east of the intersection of I-75 and Golden Gate Parkway. The subdistrict is depicted on the Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for the construction of a maximum of 36 multifamily dwellina units. in the form of townhouses. to Dromote affordable housing in Collier County. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following; a. The Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUDj b. The Subdistrict shall be developed with a maximum of 36 affordable housing, income -restricted multifamily dwelling units, including townhomes, which shall be restricted for a period of 30 years from the issuance of each certificate of occupancy (the "Restricted Period"). C. The PUD shall include a maximum PM Peak Hour trip cap which shall be the overriding limit on anv combination of the allowed uses. Page 216 Words underlined are added; words stf+*skthfetigk are deletions Page 59 of 745 Exhibit A PL20250006066 d. The income -restricted affordable housing multifamily dwelling units may be rented or sold during the Restricted Period. If rented during the Restricted Period: 1. Up to a maximum of nineteen (19) of the dwelling units shall be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County at rents that are no more than 80% AMI rent limits. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on the income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. 2. Up to a maximum of seventeen (17) of the dwelling units may be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County at rents that are no more than 120% of AMI rent limits. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on the income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier Count. 3. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income restricted units, including rent data for rental units and homestead data for owner occupied units, in a format approved by Collier County Community and Human Services Division. The developer agrees to annual on -site monitoring by the County, or its designee. £ If sold during the Restricted Period: any of the thirty-six (36) dwelling units may be purchased subject to the following: 1. Any affordable housing dwelling unit may be sold to a household that rented the unit in accordance with Section e. above provided the household's certified incomes prior to closing on the sale are up to and including 140% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. 2. Any affordable housing dwelling unit may be sold to a household whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County 3. Upon the death of a qualifying owner of an affordable housing owner -occupied dwelling unit after closing on the purchase of the unit, the ownership of the affordable housing owner -occupied dwelling unit may transfer to the heir of the owner, and the heir will not be subject to the affordable housing restrictions in this Section £ for the duration of the heir's ownership of the dwelling unit. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancv for anv of the affordable dwelling units. the owner and developer will record a restrictive covenant in the public records of Collier County identifying the affordable units and the income threshold pertaining to each unit. The covenant will state that each unit will be initially rented and/or sold and subsequently rented and/or sold to qualifying in arties or, if sold, transferred to qualifying heirs of qualifying in arties for a period of 30 Page 316 Words underlined are added; words stf+*ek th etigh are deletions Page 60 of 745 Exhibit A PL20250006066 years from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each unit. The covenant will also state that at least 30 days, prior to the initial sale or subsequent sale of any unit, the County's Community and Human Services Division, or its designee, will be notified in writing and provided documents for income verification and certification on forms acceptable to Collier County. The closing on the sale may occur after the County, or its designee, confirms that the household qualifies for the designated income thresholds. The covenant may state that each sale from the developer may include a right of first refusal for the developer for subsequent affordable rental or sale. h. For the purposes of this Ordinance, income verification, and certification shall be based on the most recent year's filed income tax return for each occupant who had filed and will occupy the affordable housing unit. 1. Income verification and certification for households or household members who had not filed the most recent year's tax return may be based on written verification to verify all regular sources of income to the household member. The written verification shall include, at a minimum, the purpose of the verification, a statement to release information, employer verification of gross annual income or rate of pay, number of hours worked, frequency of pay, bonuses, tips, and commissions and a signature block with the date of verification. The verification shall be valid for up to 90 days prior to occupancy. Upon expiration of the 90-day_period, the information may be verbally updated from the original sources for an additional 30 days, provided it has been documented by the person preparingthe verification. After this time, a new verification form must be completed. i. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income -restricted units, including rent data for rental units and homestead data for owner -occupied units, in a format approved by the Collier County Community and Human Services Division. The developer agrees to annual on -site monitoring by the County, or its designee. *** *** *** *** C. LIST OF MAPS *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Residential Subdistrict Page416 Words underlined are added; words stf+*skthfetigk are deletions Page 61 of 745 EXHIBIT A PL2025006066 Golden Gate Parkway / 60th St. Residential Subdistrict Collier County, Florida Golden Gate PKW 62nd ST SW SUBJECT SITE 0 100 200 400 Feet LEGEND ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX (Ord. No. XXXX-X) PREPARED BY. BETH YANG, AICP ® Golden Gate Parkway / 60th St. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. FILE: GOLDEN GATE PKWY/ 60TH ST RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT SITE LOCATION MAP DRAFTMXD DATE: FEB. 10, 2026 Residential Subdistrict P a g e 5 16Page 62 of 745 EXHIBIT "A" PETITION PL20250006066 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP of I Z Z J z_ VANDIiRBILT J BEA H RD ry O 0- Q PINE RIDGE RD z � O Lu (D _ o > O J O O _—G.G. PKWY r c9 U) -� - - 2 � T O Z Z J D RADIO RD 0- ry O N 11 DAVIS BLVD IY Z Q m O z Z 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 O Miles () RATTLESNAKE R 9RP P97F O J GREEN BLVD ❑ J Suject Site m w ❑ J m o U MOCK RD GOLDEN GATE BLVD TATE-75 URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 (Ord. No. 2019-25) AMENDED- NOVEMBER 10, 2020 (Ortl. No.2020-40) AMENDED - DECEMBER 8. 2020 (Ord. No.2020-50) AMENDED - OCTOBER 24, 2023 (Ord. No.2023-51) AMENDED- DECEMBER 12, 2023 (Ortl. No. 202368) AMENDED -XXXX (am. .2 XXX) R 9RF G 9aG Page 63 of 745 Page616 Bowman EXHIBIT V.D.1 Narrative, Justification, And Supplemental Information Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict SSGMPA Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is comprised of 4.18± acres and is in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida ("Property"). The Property is located to the south of Golden Gate Parkway and east of 1-75, at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th St. SW. The entirety of the Property is currently zoned E-Estates and a portion of the Property is within the Corridor Management Overlay (CMO). The Property is located within the Estates/ Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGMP), Urban Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Lands to the north of the subject property across Golden Gate Parkway are a part of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict, lands to the east, south, and west are designated Estates/ Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGMP), Urban Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The zoning and existing land uses on the surrounding lands are as follows: North: Golden Gate Parkway, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with Conditional Uses -Healthcare Services and a Community Facility (Church). South: Zoned E — Estates, developed single-family residential lots. East: 60th St. SW ROW, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with a Conditional Use — Community Facility (Church); West: Zoned E — Estates, developed with single-family residential lots. Request The applicant intends to establish the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict through a Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to the Golden Gate Area and Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element. The Property is subject to a companion PUD rezone ( PUDZ PL20250006068) The proposed SSGMPA and companion PUDZ seek to allow for a maximum of 36 affordable townhouse units at a density of up to 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The entirety of the project, all 36 dwelling units, will include affordable housing in a manner unique to Collier County. Page 1 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx Page 64 of 745 Justification The proposed SSGMPA and companion PUDZ seek to allow for a maximum of 36 affordable townhouse units at a density of up to 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The entirety of the project, all 36 dwelling units, will include affordable housing in a manner unique to Collier County. The affordable housing units will be either sold or rented based on the following: • 19 dwelling units will be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. • 17 dwelling units will be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. • All 36 units may be purchased by the tenants whose certified incomes at time of entry into a real estate sales contract are up to and including 140% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County or purchased by non -tenants, or those who have not previously occupied the units as a tenant, whose certified incomes at time of entry into a real estate sales contract are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. This project provides a unique model to address Collier County's affordable housing needs in a manner that allows tenants, utilizing affordable rentals, the opportunity to enter into home ownership. Additionally, commitments with the PUD document require any sales, after the initial sale, of the affordable units to subsequently be sold to qualifying households for a period of 30 years. The Property is in an ideal location to provide housing for the local workforce as it is central to many other employment opportunities. It is also accessible by multiple forms of transportation, with an exit onto and off 1-75 located just west of the site. The existing Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop adjacent to the north of the Property connects to 6 additional/transfer routes. According to the draft 2021 — 2025 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Human Community Development (Consolidated Plan) prepared for the Collier County Public Services Department, Community and Human Services division, "There is not a sufficient supply for low- and moderate -income households in Collier County" and "A significant lack of affordable housing existing particularly for the approximately one in four Page 2 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 65 of 745 households that are at the low or very -low income levels" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 86). The Consolidated Plan goes on to identify housing affordability as "high priority level" need. The proposed Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict will create up to 19 affordable townhouse units at an AMI of up to and including 80%, and 17 affordable townhouse units at an AMI of up to and including 120%, which helps the County achieve the overarching goals of the Consolidated Plan "To provide decent housing by ... increasing the availability of affordable housing" and "To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low- and moderate -income residents throughout the County, [and] increased housing opportunities" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 772). The County's economy is "focused on retail, hospitality, services, and agricultural" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 745) and there is a need for "development of affordable rental and owned housing, including projects located nearjob centers" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 723). The proposed SSGMPA district will fill the aforementioned need by allowing for up to 36 affordable housing units in the area, and is approximately two miles west of the Golden Gate Mixed Use Activity Center, located on Golden Gate Parkway between Santa Barbara Blvd and Collier Blvd, which is built out with varying commercial uses. Consistency with Florida Statutes Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The character of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. Page 3 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 66 of 745 i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. The subdistrict is not located in proximity to a military installation or adjacent to an airport. Paragraphs f. and g., above, do not apply. With respect to paragraphs a., b., c., and d., public facilities and services exist and have the capacity to serve the proposed development. The subdistrict would result in infill development, which provides an efficient utilization of existing urban services and facilities when compared to lower density development outside of the urban area. Regarding paragraphs i. and j., this project diversifies the County's housing stock, enhances the local tax base through increased property values in the area, and will provide for significant job creation through both the design and construction of the residential units. This SSGMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set in the Florida Statutes referenced above. In addition to this narrative, we have provided additional documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis. Section 163.3177(1)(f), Florida Statutes: (fl All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Section 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes: 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. Page 4of9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 67 of 745 b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The proposed GMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Florida Statute referenced above. In addition to the analysis found within this narrative, we have provided supporting documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis to read that conclusion. Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes 1. A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: a. The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer, and The proposed amendment is limited in size to one parcel that totals ±4.18 acres in size. b. The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposed a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future eland map amendment shall be permissible under this section. The amendment proposed to create the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict to allow for the development of the subject property with the proposed residential use. c. The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of A. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by S. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to S. 380.05(1). Page 5 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 68 of 745 The subject property is not located within an area of critical concern. Consistency with GMP Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element 3,2 — Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. 3.2.1 Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low -density residential development. 3.2.3 Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site -specific master plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. The proposed subdistrict is located directly adjacent to a minor arterial roadway, it is located approximately 1,200 linear feet from the Golden Gate Parkway and Interstate-75 interchange, and approximately 1/4 of a mile east of a major collector roadway (Santa Barbara Blvd.). The Property is located at the corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th St. SW, with the 62nd St. SW ROW intersecting the NE corner of the property to provide access to the residences and community facilities to the west onto Golden Gate Parkway. Directly to the east of the Property is an existing church, to the north, beyond Golden Gate Parkway are healthcare services and an additional church. Given this location of the Property to proximity of major roadways, it is an ideal location for higher densities (8.6 dwelling units per acre). The Property is in a convenient location with access to 60th St. SW, that will prevent residents within this development to travel further west or south on the local roads where there are existing Estates developed residential properties. Further, the companion RPUD includes development standards requiring an enhanced buffer adjacent to the developed residential estates properties, and standards to ensure building compatibility with the residential area. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan... Page 6 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 69 of 745 The proposed SSGMPA is consistent with all applicable Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). Policy 5.5. Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by. confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban... The subject site and surrounding lands to the north, south, east, and west are designated Urban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed development discourages sprawl as it is adjacent to development on the south and west, and lands to the north and east are separated by roadways. Policy 5.6. New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted Jun 22, 2004 and effective October 78, 2004, as amended). The proposed uses are compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses, which include residential development. Development standards and perimeter buffers proposed within the RPUD will ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. Objective 7. Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to front collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The site is located south of Golden Gate Parkway and west of 601" Street SW, with 62nd Street SW splitting the subject property at its northeast corner. It is proposed in the concept plan that an ingress/egress location will be built on the east side of the subject property. This access point will allow residents to and others access the property from 60th Street SW which intersects with Golden Gate Parkway, a minor arterial roadway. Page 7of9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 70 of 745 Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Based on the size of the subject site, loop roads and additional internal accesses are not feasible. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The project will connect to 601h Street SW, a local road. The Concept Plan allows for an access point located on the east side of the subject property to lead to the local road. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The development will include a sidewalk along the right side of the project's proposed interior road. The sidewalk will allow residents to travel safely between buildings and to the access point of the site. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.7.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural -Industrial District and Rural -Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria... The proposed RPUD rezoning will meet the required minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards or mitigate offsite as allowed by the LDC. Page 8of9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 71 of 745 Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats... No Listed Species were observed on -site, as provided for in the Listed Species Survey section of the submitted Environmental Data. Transportation Element Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five- year planning period. There is no significant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five-year planning periods. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between development to facilitate convenient movement through the road network. The project will utilize an ingress/egress at 60th Street SW, which allows those on the property to reach Golden Gate Parkway to the north and Estates designated properties to the south. Page 9 of 9 Submittal -1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 Exhibit V.D.1 - Narrative Justification and Supplmental Information (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 72 of 745 FIR 1/2"-NO ID w z o- � o M 't-- z r O Q M J o o J ~ C' w w = i d (D Y O Of v53 O r) O 0 �o w a w 0 z O 0 FIR -NO ID 9 6 - - - 1.O 9A7.6 g6 6p + 66, 6 A 6� 6S FN-NO ID 9g9 (BENT) �� 9? 9 '>o 9.50 9 J `BQ Te +7.4 d 96.8 6.6 6Q e6 A PORTION OF TRACT 61 (OR 3055, PG 1172) (IMPROVED) OWNER: RAYMOND J & KIMBERLEE CLEARY 0 0 O M c'M �o M 00 c'M "t 000 00 00 C/)N A PORTION OF TRACT 44 (OR 4865, PG 2920) (IMPROVED) OWNER: ERIC F ANDERSON TRUST / -4- _?0 / -+- 9?j 9 I e P.O.B. GARAGE UIS� RY RESIDENCE 9° sGARAGE a95+��LESS & EXCEPT ry ''s tPo O NE 9 9 + B >0 96, ob`� rl 60 60� y i99d o -� GRPNEL DR 69 66 ? Q I 05 05 ,� o + &> 9> S 0°55' 17" E (D) O N 0'29'15" W 545.00' 9 N 0° 19' 10" W (P) �• + + 93 90 A PORTION OF TRACT 49 (HEAVILY WOODED) OWNER: ANNA R MONGILLO AREA: 181,901 SQUARE FEET OR 4.18 ACRES, MORE OR LESS N o + '96' + +o zg+ 448.97' 9rr -'9p - _ _ - dS + - d� - +❑+ - +S B 1 - - - G9 + liA 66. + 69 6°., 6• '9 �0 .S d 0+ + >B + 60 + + 8.4 0 9 •d 6+ �h + - 91t 92+ +? �96 o M 9>s EDGE OF PAVEMENT 9>0 9 Yf. 9 •SS 9 56. 9 Yg O 0 Z w 2 i 99 9> s 4 ? v 9sp 9s� 9 19 �' - EDGE OF PAVEMENT �6S B > > 1111,1 ah+ 6 OM +> 96, + +68 + + 9 {sg + �O. �pp� 9S + oar + 9 +9.0 + +9.6 Ej + 9 CONCRETE DRIVE A PORTION OF TRACT 60 (IMPROVED) OWNER: CRISTIANA PRIMERA IGLESIA CURVE TABLE CURVE # RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH Cl 45.00' 35.35' 4559'57" S 67'59'02" E 34.45' C1 (D) 45.00' 35.34' 4559'57" N 6824'53" W 34.45' C2 105.00' 82.47' 45'00'00" S 67'58'45" E 80.36' C2 (D) 105.00' 82.47' 45'00'00" N 6824'54" W 80.36' C3 45.00' 35.34' 45'00'00" N 67 58'45" W 34.44' C3 (D) 45.00' 35.34' 45'00'00" S 68'24'54" E 34.44' C4 105.00' 82.47' 4559'57" N 67 58'47" W 80.37' C4 (D) 105.00' 82.47' 4559'57" S 68-24-53" E 80.37' LEGEND POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PB PLAT BOOK EL ELEVATION CATCH BASIN POB POINT OF BEGINNING OR OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK INV INVERT ELEVATION DO DRAINAGE MANHOLE HIP O FOUND IRON PIPE PG PAGE(S) RIM RIM ELEVATION EJ MITERED END FIR O FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT/PAD ❑O YARD DRAIN SIR • SET 5/8" IRON ROD w/CAP, L.B. #5151 LB LICENSED BUSINESS CONC CONCRETE WV ® WATER VALVE FCM ❑ FOUND 4"x4" CONCRETE MONUMENT SPC STATE PLANE COORDINATES CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ❑W WATER METER SCM SET CONC. MONUMENT w/ALUMINUM DISK, ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY CPP CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE masa BACK FLOW PREVENTOR L.B. #5151 PUE PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE -& FIRE HYDRANT FPK L FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL CUE COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT CHW CONCRETE HEADWALL O FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SPY SET PARKER KALON NAIL w/ALUMINUM UE UTILITY EASEMENT TOB TOP OF BANK (D BACTERIA SAMPLE POINT DISK, L.B. # 5151 AE ACCESS EASEMENT TOS TOE OF SLOPE + AIR RELEASE VALVE FDH O FOUND DRILL HOLE DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT EOW EDGE OF WATER IRV 0 IRRIGATION VALVE/ CONTROL VALVE SDH •SET DRILL HOLE LME LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT CL CENTER LINE GV ® GAS VALVE FMN 0 FOUND NAIL D LBE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT © GAS LINE MARKER FMN SET NAIL IRRE IRRIGATION EASEMENT � BOLLARD cM GAS MARKER FPL FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT cr GREASE TRAP UTILITY POLE - WOOD (P) PLAT WIVE WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT SANITARY MANHOLE 0 UTILITY POLE - CONCRETE (M) MEASURED NAVD NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 CO O CLEAN OUT ___) GUY ANCHOR (C) CALCULATED NGVD NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 SV 0 SEWER VALVE OVERHEAD WIRES (D) DEED/TITLE COMMITMENT LIGHT POLE Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE ❑T TELEPHONE RISER/BOX © CABLE TELEVISION RISER/BOX Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE ❑E ELECTRIC RISER/BOX/METER ❑ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 0 TRAFFIC LIGHT UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKER --C)-- SIGN ON POLE PI POINT OF INTERSECTION CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE WF WOOD FENCE AF ALUMINUM FENCE - OH OH OH - OVERHEAD WIRES - FZ FZ FZ - APPROXIMATE FLOOD ZONE LINE F-T ASPHALT F-T CONCRTE F-T BRICK PAVER 6> + ro'�o N I 0*29'15" W 60 I >9 9Q 9s N 0°29'15" W 69 r 60.00' I 1 75.00' FIR -NO ID I I I N 0-55'17" W(D) I N 0°55'17" W (D) �o N 0° 19' 10" W (P) j N 0° 19' 10" W (P) I�I 0. 9 I v 9S p + + +FAO + �S + +� r �9S S 9 i TL i 966, 9? 6S sI rr .9y>,9c BB9 i 0-I �I o I -�� O �.� wwl r� 9s 0 C) I o�l s o.CO, lj ill ?� cy) 00 00 00001 (n z 8.9 I �' Z Z I 9S0 9R 90 9r �'9J d U O Cw ) d o / CD w CD z o / 0 cn Lj CD 0 I I w �i J I B,,r 't 00 00 r7 _ 0 VT0 0 FIR -NO IDS a m> s o 9 s s I�? 9s }9'I QM °N' o 00 Co:2 0 J 6� 0 00 i S? 9sB I`fl 6 w Il,jl CD � 1 FIR 1/2 9? w 0-0- z www ALTAMAX I z 0 00 �o g8 W o�o FIR -LB 7805� a° w w M L" 00 00 co 0.28' E, 0.27' S J C) o z z z 90 / 9L w �Q1 8? ,p w + 9s8 9>9 9S 9g9 / `90 -?6'(?6'BB (D �� h� / 9s? � I 1✓��' r Y I 5 ° QP l> + a I (D a (D Q ^a O� G� OAP 9 66 w = o / F j pQ F� s8 I W 5 Q `� JF� 8.5 I n m o FIR -LB 7805� o l o Q 0.52' E, 0.16' N FIR 1 /2" o g /a+ + 9+ 9QO �� ss ILLEGIBLE IRV 9> � s W ^a° a) d0 69 6,S 9 9 J 8.6 + O� 9e9 � n ^o^�� D D � W 99A p R, III��011llll VN o li w W a° 96, FIR 1 j c ee A PORTION OF o 6' 0 0 0_ I I 9� LB 7833 w TRACT 49 p n_ p 8.9+ (HEAVILY WOODED) z oo, � °� � 9 CO ti OWNER: ANNA R MONGILLO 00 r 0000 + C7 t0 ° rn 9! Z Z i '9S o6 6,9 sp 9S 9`?°T 69 d V 9 0O 00 9S 9S 96, +e6 +ea ,6 FIR 1 2' s ° 0 z + +9s + +o d �° 9 LB 7833 +� 05 8� 91 S 0*29'16" E + 9r + 1/0 9s> N 0°29'16° W FIR -NO ID ?s .°+ ? , 96.03' 83+ 90 9s + /� 75.00' 69 6S d j 60.00' d6, BS �9 - -B OPL- OPL ❑� 6� 9 9pS e 9 N O°29'16" W e 9 0 96+� 9s> FIR 1/2" 94+9 ° �9 S 0°55'20" E (D) + _+ _tao °t + r9 LB 7833 9 9 `l? y 906d .0 p6 �? I •?? > of < '?S 60TH ST SW ASPHALT ROADWAY CORNER NOT FOUND OR SET. \ CATCH BASIN FALLS ON CORNER. o S 0'29'15" E 9>6 680.00' 96S ySy I 9s, A> S 0'19'10" E (P) r 9 y I + + 9 + 9 + .9R 9 +.ij 9s? B9 9S •?S S9 R + B 0� 9�9 9�� 9s dS B S + +9 o + a° + +93 +90 `99 9s0 a 9 CONCRETE DRIVE 0 15' 30' 60' SCALE: 1" = 30' THIS PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED FROM INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE FOR REPRODUCTION REASONS RPL RPL- RPL- RPL- RPL (RPL) RED PAINT LINE (ELECTRIC) OPL OPL OPL OPL OPL (OPL) ORANGE PAINT UNE (COMMUNICATIONS/ALARM/SIGNAL LINES, CABLES, OR CONDUITS) PPL PPL- PPL- PPL- PPL (PPL) PURPLE PAINT LINE (RECLAIM WATER, IRRIGATION) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER PROVIDED TITLE COMMITMENT) ALL OF TRACT 49, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3210, PAGE 750, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA II P.O.B. LESS & EXCEPT P.O.C. LESS & EXCEPT (OR 3210, PG 750) W LJ 00 o o 0 0 Lc) O M O ce)00� Z Z 1 I I70 I \ +°6' �- 100.0' PLATTED ROAD 0 '00. EXCEP lON 6 s °6c s 50.050.0' 1 III SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONS PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A COMMITMENT NUMBER 12410006, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 22, 2025 AT 8:00 AM. *ITEMS 1-5, NOTHING TO SHOW.* EXCEPTION #6 RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS AS CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 30, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #7 RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 212, PAGE 517, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET /N NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #8 RESTRICTIONS OR RESERVATIONS AFFECTING RIGHTS IN OIL, GAS OR ANY OTHER MINERALS, LYING UPON OR BENEATH THE LANDS INSURED HEREBY, AS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 30, PAGE 86, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOTE: NO FURTHER SEARCH OF TITLE HAS BEEN MADE AS TO THE OUTSTANDING INTEREST OR OF THE HOLDERS OF SUCH INTEREST IN THE AFOREMENTIONED SUBSURFACE RIGHT(S). (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET /N NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #9 THE GRANTEE, HIS SUCCESSORS, HEIRS OR ASSIGNS, SHALL PAY FOR THE PAVING OF PLATTED STREETS FOR THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IF AND WHEN SAID STREETS ARE PAVED, PURSUANT TO A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS MORE FULLY SHOWN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 80, PAGE 183, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #10 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 244, PAGE 914 AND AS PARTIALLY RELEASED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1059, PAGE 631, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, JO' PERIMETER EASEMENTS AND 60' BISECTING EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 244, PAGE 914 HAVE BEEN RELEASED PER O.R. 1059, PAGE 631, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #11 SUBJECT TO THOSE RESTRICTIONS BETWEEN GULF AMERICAN LAND CORPORATION AND ALL FUTURE OWNERS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES DATED NOVEMBER 29, 1961 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 97, PAGE 492, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #12 ORDINANCES 75-20 (WATER), 75-21 (TREES) AND 75-24 (ZONING) AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 619, PAGES 1177 THROUGH 1381, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED IN DOCUMENT NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #13 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE IMMOKALEE AREA PLANNING DISTRICT AND THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT AND DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ENACT A COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT OF COLLIER COUNTY, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 649, PAGE 1239, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PARCEL, NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #14 SUBJECT TO THAT CERTAIN ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT DATED JUNE 29, 1976 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 655, PAGE 1197, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (DOCUMENT NOT AVAILABLE) EXCEPTION #15 SUBJECT TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF GOLDEN GATE FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT AS CONTAINED IN AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO THE PUBLIC DATED APRIL 3, 1990 AND RECORDED MAY 30, 1990, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1532, PAGES 1128 THROUGH 1142, INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED /N DOCUMENT NOT SHOWN HEREON) EXCEPTION #16 THE DESCRIPTION OF THAT AREA OR THAT PART OF THE PREMISES AS CONDEMNED AND DESCRIBED WITHIN THE ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3210, PAGE 750, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AFFECTS SUBJECT PARCEL, SHOWN HEREON) NOTES: �I 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED BY THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY FOR FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 1983 DATUM WITH 2O11 ADJUSTMENT OBTAINED UTILIZING RTK GPS OBSERVATIONS ON THE FDOT NETWORK AND REFER TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF TRACT 49 OF SAID PLAT, AS BEING N 0°29'15" W 2. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF ABSTRACT OF TITLE PROVIDED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH A COMMITMENT NUMBER 12410006, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 22, 2025 AT 8:00 AM, AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ALL MATTERS OF TITLE SHOULD BE REFERRED TO AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. 3. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). SOURCE BENCHMARK IS COL 19. 4. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AH, HAVING A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 10.0' (NAVD 88), PER THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP # 12021C 0411 J, DATED 2/8/2024. 5. CERTAIN FEATURES REPRESENTED BY SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AT THEIR TRUE LOCATION AND/OR SCALE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DEPICT THEM ON THIS MAP. 6. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 7. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, ENDANGERED WILDLIFE OR JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS, IF ANY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 8. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, SETBACKS, OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. 9. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE SEAL OR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND DIGITAL SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SURVEY MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. 10. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BELOW GROUND UTILITIES AND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY. 11. BY SIGNING BELOW I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.051, F.A.C, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 12. OWNERSHIP AND ADDRESS INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS TAKEN FROM THE LEE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. 13. UTILITIES WERE REQUESTED TO BE FLAGGED BY SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL. NO UTILITY MARKINGS WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME OF LAST FIELD WORK. CERTIFIED TO: WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, P.A. ANNA R. MONGILLO CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1. 2. 3. 4 AND 8 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELDWORK WAS COMPLETED ON 5/6/2025. TODD B. SHORT P.S.M #7587, FOR THE FIRM DATE Page 73 of 745 Legend Q Subject Site Schools 0 Sheriff/Fire Department/EMS Notes on Public Service Facilities 1. Police Protection is provided by Collier County Sheriffs Office 2. Fire protection is provided by Greater Naples Fire Rescue 3. The subject site is not located within the county's Coastal High Hazard Area N 0 0.44 0.88 Miles I I I ncfr",rfoymnf a Golf and Country Club Marbella Dr ailey Ln + LL 7 i vWyndemere Greater Naples �' Country Club Fire Rescue ise Ln Station #24 S 1�dgemere Way a Grey Oaks Poinciana Country N UT Elementary Club School m 31 881 4 Maples Grande Golf Club Collier County ❑r Arnold Ave Sheriff's Office Tivoli ❑r r Way Mercantile Av 5 Ln cc Tibor Ct Progress Ave o U) m Domestic Ave n � o 3 z °seshoe or 3 S CD Flight Dr Enterprise Ave m m Exchange Ave Q Prospect Ave i 151 Westview Dr V c 7i Q Foxfire North Rd Country IQ; Club Lancewood Way Hawthorn Woods Way 15th Ave SW Blvd Green Blvd 18th PI 17th Ave W 17th Ave 5W Cedar Tree Ln Grace Community School Golden Gate West Elementary GnSP Nicaea Academy School fRa Early Learning Herbert Cambridge I W Preschool of Naples Elementary School Se c w GL a a N ABC Academy Scholar ::E Collier County Star Grass Ln N Learning T Sheriffs Office Academy g Center Preschool t � sw - --- District 2 ' St. Elizabeth Copper Leaf Ln 07 Seton Catholic s �� Greater Naples School Q;eQ Fire Rescue Subject � � Station #70 � • N Site ooGold IS Vy Mid d Golden Gate � 5t. John Neumann Catholic Middle School n JPkwyHigh School 1--Mile 2-Miles 31s Ave SW 32nd Ave 5W Golden Gate High School r� BERKSHIRE _ LAKES Glen Eagle Country Club -c. Pond m m 0 c w � �c N � a Glen i856' I �untr and Country Club a m Y Q. a Greater Naples Fire Rescue Station #75 Coda G7 Green Blvd 1Gth PI SW Quality Inn Golf Resort Mike Davis Elementary School 4F IIC 950 Naples, Encore Exhibit V.E.2 Public Service Facilities Map Naples, FL 3411 Q Phone:(fA 254-2000 Project GatewayResidential Subdistrict Florida Certification of Authorization No. 30462 Bowman Page 74 of 745 Legend Q Subject Site Collier County Parcels _ — Elevation Contours (5 ft. Intervals) FEMA Flood Hazard Zones AH �X The 1 % annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year- The Special Flood Hazard Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood - Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the water -surface elevation of the 1 % annual chance flood. Zone X Area is determined to be outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area - Zone A No Base Flood Elevations determined. Zone AE, AE Base Flood Elevations determined. Zone AH, AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined- m 0 0.03 0.06 Miles I i I 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 254-2000 Florida Certification of Authorization No. 30462 Bowman J J r, I 1 �� [� I~� c• 1 �. s Ai r , Bath 10 10 fiolden Gate ------ ------ qr �t11J- 1 � ~�, I [I t I � I j06- I Qrpus Chris Chapel aa6 Thera Ig Cristian �nantial Vida I � I-== Subject F Site C. J _�A&— I !1\ 411,t*�. sssl�'f� J I I � I 7 r L-J Exhibit V.F.1 FIRM Data Map Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict I';�mA 75 of 745 Bowman January 13, 2026 Austin Grubb, AICP, Planner III Collier County Growth Management Division Comprehensive Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Golden Gate Parkway/60" St. Residential Subdistrict SSGMPA (PL-20250006066) Bowman File No. 340900 Dear Mr. Grubb: We are in receipt of the County's Comment Letter dated November 25, 2025, and offer the responses below. Concluding the review of this resubmittal, we respectively request to be scheduled for the March 19, 2026, CCPC hearing date and the April 28, 2026, BCC Hearing The following title has been drafted to describe this petition for public notice purposes. Please review this for accuracy and advise of any necessary changes in writing: Request the Board of County Commissioners amend Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, specifically amending the Element [and/or] the Map to allow [DESCRIBE THE REQUESTED CHANGE] FOR [ENTER ACREAGE] ± acres located at [INSERT ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION] in Section Township South, Range East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20250006066] Response: In prior SSGMPA, staff will provide the suggested title and seek the applicant's comments. Please provide the proposed title via email and we will respond accordingly. COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW — HEIDI ASHTON-CICKO GMP Text: Please use the County's template for affordable housing rentals. Update: Please add missing template language. Response: Revised as requested 6. Please address the comments and changes per my 11-17-2025 review of the proposed GMP amendment, to be provided by email by County staff. Response: Revised as requested. Submittal 3 AG 260113 Response Letter 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 76 of 745 Austin Grubbs, AICP, Principal Planner Golden Gate Parkway/601h St. Residential Subdistrict SSGMPA (PL20250006066) Bowman File No. 340900 January 13, 20256 Page 2 PUBLIC UTILITIES PUED REVIEW — CLAUDIA CARMENATE 4. In "Exhibit V.E.1 Public Facilities Report" Potable Water and Wastewater section, the language "Collier County Public Utilities has sufficient treatment capacity." does not specifically addressed statutory requirements. Response: That statement has been removed. In "Exhibit V.E.1 Public Facilities Report" Solid Waste section, the language "This is adequate to accommodate the expected tons per capita generated by the proposed project," does not specifically address statutory requirements. Response: That statement has been removed. GENERAL COMMENTS — AUSTIN GRUBB 1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient application has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition, and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). 2. Please be advised that under the LDC, an application can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the application for six (6) months. Those six months will be calculated from the date of this letter. 3. Please ensure that all members of your review team who may testify before the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the county under regulations regarding that issue. 4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of all Plans. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. 7. Pursuant to F.S. 125.022, exhibits and application materials are subject to review upon each resubmittal until deemed sufficient and complete. Should the project receive a third request for additional information, staff requests that the applicant provide written acknowledgement with the resubmittal to waive the regulation that restricts the County from requesting additional information. Projects that do not include such written Submittal 3 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 AG 260113 Response Letter P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 77 of 745 Austin Grubbs, AICP, Principal Planner Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. Residential Subdistrict SSGMPA (PL20250006066) Bowman File No. 340900 January 13, 20256 Page 3 acknowledgement and that fail to address any outstanding review items with the 4th submittal will be denied/recommended for denial. 8. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petition review upon the 5th and subsequent submittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. 9. If you would like to discuss the review comments, require clarification and/or wish to identify agree -to -disagree issues, a post -review meeting can be arranged including all rejecting reviewers. To schedule a post -review meeting, please contact me, and Zoning Operations staff will proceed with scheduling. Response: Acknowledged. Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Documents Hosting a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is required for this application type. To resolve this condition, please upload all supporting NIM documents from meeting to the GMD Public Portal. Contact Planner of this project for additional questions. If you experience issues uploading, please contact Client Services at 239-252-1036. Response: Acknowledged. We enclose the following: • Response Letter; • Exhibit IV.B — GMPA Text Amendment (revised); • Exhibit IV.B — GMPA Text Amendment (Redlined); • Exhibit V.E.1 — Public Facilities Report (revised); and • Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. TIS (revised). If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, BOWMAN �Q & Ellen Summers, AICP Senior Manager, Planning and Development ES/sk cc: Michael Puchalla, Executive Director w/enclosures Zach Lombardo, Esquire w/enclosures Submittal 3 AG 260113 Response Letter 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254,2000 bowman.com Page 78 of 745 January 9, 2026 FILE PATH:V1340900 - Collier -Build toRent to Own Concept Plan\340900-01-001 (PLN) - Collier -Build toRent to Own Concept Plan\Planning\RPUD\DW\RevD3\3400900-01-001 P01_portrait.dwg LAND USESUMMARY D-M- CRI PTION IAC I RESI DENTAL 3.15 75.36% TOTAL PROPERTY 4.18 100% 'FINAL CALCULATION FOR THE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT. "SEE DEVIATION #1 DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT: a. EX. NATIVE VEGETATION GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (1001 ROW) 62ND ST. SW (601 ROW) = 3.68 AC. b. MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED (10%) = 0.37 AC c. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT SHALL BE FULFILLED OFFSITE 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 36 AFFORDABLE HOUSING MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING U )NING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY ENHANCED 25�I�" TYPE "C" LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL M.W.D. P,W,B, E,S, DESIGN DRAWN CHKD , CnUl ;U M60TH GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/ ST. RPUD SCALE 1" =30' JOB No. 340900-01-001 I DATE January 9, 2026 MASTER CONCEPT PLAN SHEET No. P-01 - MASTER PLAN .DATE DESCRIPTION PROPERTY BOUNDARY Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone (239) 254-2000 www.bowmanconsulting.com © Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. DRY DETENTION 0.08 AC ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE COMMUNITY FACILITY RIGHT OF WAY TYPE "D" BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15' 30' 60' (IN FEET) SCALE: 1" = 30' ovvrnan FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER 30462 Page 79 of 745 Bowman EXHIBIT V.E.1 Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. Subdistrict Public Facilities Report Potable Water and Wastewater Per the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR), the potable water LOS standard is 130 GPCD; and per the 2024 AUIR, the wastewater treatment system LOS standard in Golden Gate service area is 90 GPCD. The proposed Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Subdistrict potentially increases population by approximately 90 people at buildout (36 dwelling units at 2.50 persons per household). The estimated potable water and wastewater average requirements for the residential portion of the proposed amendment are as follows: Potable Water 12,600 GPD average daily (Peak 16,380 GPD) Wastewater 9,000 GPD average daily (Peak 26.6 GPM) Utilities do not currently serve the site; however, the intent is to move forward with extending the utilities across Golden Gate Parkway to serve the site. The proposed additional potable water and wastewater demand as calculated above will not cause any LOS issues within the 5-year planning horizon. Solid Waste According to the Collier County 2024 AUIR, currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 11,789,286 tons, and a ten-year permitted landfill capacity of 3,340,352 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 35 years. The proposed additional solid waste demand as calculated above will not cause any LOS issues within the 5-year planning horizon. The proposed GMP Amendment will increase the population by approximately 90 persons at buildout for an additional 36 dwelling units. Using a ton's per capita rate of 0.70 (per the 2024 AUIR), a population increase of 90 people will generate an additional 63 tons disposed per year. Stormwater Management Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD requirements, and State and County standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to stormwater management (drainage) level of service. The site does not affect County - maintained canals, ditches, or stormwater control structures. Page 1 of 3 Submittal - 3 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.E.1 - Public Facilities Report (01-09-2026).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 80 of 745 Fire and EMS An EMS/fire station is located approximately 2 miles east at 4741 Golden Gate Parkway. The subject site is within the Greater Naples Fire District. Transportation Based on the findings of the Transportation Impact Statement, it was determined that the proposed residential development will not adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted levels of services. It is anticipated that the project will add 18 new PM peak hour trips to the surrounding roadway network. School Concurrency The adopted level of service for schools is based upon permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity: 100% for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs); 95% for elementary CSAs; and 95% for middle school CSAs. The subject site is within the E4 Golden Gate City Area CSA for elementary schools, the M2 Southwest Area CSA for middle schools, and the H2 Southwest Area CSA for high schools. The FISH capacity and enrollment data below is per the Collier County Public Schools ("CCPS") Capital Improvement Plan, for fiscal years 2024 through 2043. The E4 Golden Gate City Area CSA includes six elementary schools: Calusa Park, Golden Gate, Golden Terrace, Herbert Cambridge, Lavern Gaynor, and Mike Davis. They have a combined FISH capacity of 4,268 students, a 2024/2025 peak enrollment of 2,990 students, and a projected 2027/2028 enrollment of 3,127 students (73% capacity). CCPS is monitoring the enrollment at Calusa Park. The M2 Southwest Area CSA includes three middle schools: East Naples, Gulfview, and Manatee. They have a combined FISH capacity of 3,014 students, a 2024/2025 peak enrollment of 2,203 students, and a projected 2027/2028 enrollment of 2,123 students (70% capacity). According to the CCPS CIP, enrollments at Gulfview, Manatee, and East Naples Middle Schools are being monitored. The H2 Southwest Area CSA includes two high schools: Lely and Naples. There is a FISH capacity of 3,916 students, a 2024/2025 peak enrollment of 3,004 students, and a projected 2027/2028 enrollment of 3,081 (79% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, enrollment at Naples and Lely High Schools are being monitored. Page 2 of 3 Submittal - 3 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.E.1 - Public Facilities Report (01-09-2026).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 81 of 745 The proposed Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. Subdistrict consists of up to 36 dwelling units, broken down by type in the table below, in accordance with Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance(s) methodology and terminology and applying the student generation rates (SGR) established in the 2015 Collier County School Impact Fee Study, the most recent data available, the proposed subdistrict is anticipated to generate 4 new students at build out. Residential Unit Type Units SGR Projected Students Total MFD, Condo, Duplex, Single -Family Attached 36 0.11 3.96 Total Residential 36 4 There is no impact to parks and recreation and a minimal impact to school facilities as a result of this project. Page 3 of 3 Submittal - 3 PL20250006066 Exhibit V.E.1 - Public Facilities Report (01-09-2026).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 82 of 745 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Golden Gate Parkway/601h Street RPUD flkla Project Gateway August 12, 2025 Revised December 3, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (JMB PROJECT Na_ 25061 3) Page 83 of 745 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 5 Scope of Project 6 Table A - Proposed Land Use 6 Figure 1 - Location Map 6.1 Master Concept Plan 6.2 Project Generated Traffic 7 Table B - Site -Generated Trips 7 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 7.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 8 Project Traffic Distribution 8 Area of Significant Impact 8 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 8.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 8.2 2024 thru 2028 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2024 & 2028 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2028 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 Appendix 10 1 Page 84 of 745 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that Golden Gate Parkway/60t' Street RPUD (f/k/a Project Gateway) will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted levels of services. It was determined that the site -generated traffic associated with the proposed 36 townhomes will have less than a 2% impact on the adjacent road network. In fact, the project will have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1% impact on any road's adopted capacity standard). It was verified that all roadways, within the projects area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed multi- family development. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of Golden Gate Parkway (between Livingston Road and I-75) slightly exceeds the adopted level of service capacity. More specifically, Golden Gate Parkway - Link 20.2 is operating at a v/c ratio = 100.8%. This segment of Golden Gate Parkway is not within the project's area of impact and is not significantly or negatively impacted by the proposed project. In fact, the project's impact is 0.14% of the road's capacity which is insignificant and defined as de minimis. It is also noted that Collier County Government has initiated a corridor study for Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of identifying operational improvements that could be completed to improve traffic flow and safety measures as well as increase capacity along the subject corridor. Although this.project does not significantly impact the specific link of concern, the Applicant welcomes any and all improvements that will improve capacity, safety and traffic flow. Site Access Conditions The project proposes having one (1) full access on 60t' Street SW. The site access design will be finalized at the time of acquiring final development approval. East Central TCMA The project is located within the East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), and subject to Policy 5.1 thru 5.3 and 5.6 thru 5.8 of the Growth Management Plan. The Applicant has satisfied these policies as discussed below. Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would 2 Page 85 of 745 directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current A UIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year A UIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IA)Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. Project Status — Satisfied The project does not significantly impact or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. The project will have a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1% impact) on the adjacent road network. Policy 5.2: Project traffic that is I % or less of the adopted peak hour service volume represents a de minimis impact. Authorization of development with a de minimis impact shall be pursuant to Section 163.3180(6), Florida Statutes. Project Status — Satisfied The project has a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1% impact) on the adjacent road network, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.3: In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved projects must go through a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.B. 7, of the Land Development Code. Project Status — Satisfied The Applicant is not requesting vesting. No further action is required to address this specific policy. Policy 5.6 In order to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at Page 86 of 745 least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Project Status — Satisfied The project does not significantly impact or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. The project will have a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1% impact) on the adjacent road network. The Applicant is not requesting to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.7 Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A and 1.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. If any Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the lane miles in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated above, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs unless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOS standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LOS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Plan. Project Status - Satisfied As established by Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the East Central TCMA has 85% of its north/south and east/west lane miles operating at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A. and 1.5.B. of the GMP. No further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.8 Should the TIS for a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1 % of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: (VI)(Ma. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Section 163.3180(5)(h), Florida Statutes. The facility cost for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as 2 Page 87 of 745 determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding lanes to a similar area/facility type as the constrained facility. (VI)b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segment(s) and/or to enhance mass transit or other non -automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district. (VI)c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. (VI) (IA)d. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR-7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. Project Status - Satisfied The project will not directly access a hurricane evacuation route that is operating below its adopted level of service. Furthermore, the project will not significantly or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. In fact, the proposed land use will have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1% impact on any road's adopted capacity standard), and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Methodology On July 23, 2025, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. The TIS methodology was reviewed by staff and a copy of the approved methodology is provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). Subsequent to the acceptance of the Traffic Impact Statement Methodology, the Traffic Impact Statement incorporated the following changes: 1. The Traffic Impact Statement was based upon the recently published ITE Trip Generation Manual 12th Edition vs. the 1Ph Edition. Page 88 of 745 Scope of Project Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD (Vk/a Project Gateway) is a proposed residential development that will consist of 36 townhomes. The property is located on the southwest corner of 601h Street SW and Golden Gate Parkway, within Collier County, Florida. The project proposes having one (1) full access on 60th Street SW. The site access design will be finalized at the time of acquiring final development approval. It is expected that the project will be completed by the year 2028. Table A Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Size Multi -Family 36 Dwelling Units 0 Page 89 of 745 a -IfI O d Q ' Poinciana School Estuary Dr I Golden Gate Parkway Lonqboat Drive Clipper Way1 Mercantile Avenue Outrigger Lane v o Progress a ue Of Horseshoe Dr N. :3 � 0 0 Domestic Kv nue c>> Horseshoe Dr S. c o N m Enterprise Ave I Enterprise 4nue o Napl s Airport I Lxcnange Propspect F Naples Airport i Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Road I � I Y I I NORTH I O N.T.S. Ln o_ �I I ^ t Q I— 0 o of c' l 0 0 1 m I C > �I J I I I I U) M E in in I 0 o c°°o m co I Golden Gate Parkway I2nd St SW ` Ln 1 o L o I � 115 I rfi- I I IDevonshire Blvd Radio Road Radio Road I lop I A— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — North Road aJIMTRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. Project Gateway July 23, 2025 LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY — 6—LANE ARTERIAL 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD — Project Location & FIGURE 1 Roadway Classification 6.1 Page 90 of 745 LAND USESUNNARY DESCRIPTION AC % FMDEaAL 3.15 75.36% TOTALPROPOW 4.18 100% OPEN SPACESUMMAW FMUIR®(40%) PROVIDED(40%)** 1.67 1.67 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (100' ROW) 62ND ST. SW (60' ROW) PROPERTY BOUNDARY *FINAL CALCULATION FOR THE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF SDP. **SEE DEVIATION #1 DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT: a. EX. NATIVE VEGETATION = 3.68 AC. b. MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED (10%) = 0.37 AC c. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT SHALL BE FULFILLED OFFSIT 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 36 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BOUNDARY DRY DETENTION 0.08 AC TYPE "D" •. _ ; BUFFER .—�� co rn 0 Z� , ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE COMMUNITY FACILITY O > 30' I ! RIGHT OF WAY DRY DETENTION 0.23 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT F.1) FINAL ACCESS LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAT OR SDP 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT 17.1) ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY 10, TYPE "D" BUFFER BOUNDARY N B GRAPHIC SCALE 0 (EN FEET) SCALE: V = 30' LAN Itil I wN cnlm GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/ �.a , o®�� a� _ 60TH ST. RPUD """'�' MAMMC�IN�1CPT MASTER PLAN FI.ORIDA r.r-M.ATF OF AIRHORI OON NUMRFR3 62 P.O of 745 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 12t` Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code Multi - Family (LUC 220) was most appropriate for estimating the anticipated site -generated trips. It is noted that ITE's trip rates/equations are based upon 50 to 60 surveys having an average survey sample size of about 215 dwelling units. The ITE equation for the AM and PM peak hours include a constant value of (+) 12.93 and (+) 7.35 trips, respectively. When weighted over the sample size of 215 dwelling units yields a constant value of 0.060 trips/unit and 0.034 trips/unit vs. weighted over a 36 units which yields 0.36 and 0.20 trips/unit. Therefore, it is concluded that using the equation vs. the "averaged" trip rate overstates the volume of site generated trips by a factor of about 6.0 per unit for each of the 36 units. As indicated by the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, the use of the equations vs. average rates should be determined based upon the number of studies and the sample size as it is applicable to the size of the project. As determined, the project will generate 15 vph and 19 new two-way trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Net New Trips Generated Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips (vph) (vph) ADT Multi -Family 224 15 19 (36 d. u. 's) The report concludes that the project will generate fewer than 50 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "fewer than 50 trips", which is define as a small-scale study. 7 Page 92 of 745 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 36 Units Land Use Trip Generation Equation Code Trip Period (Based upon S.F.) Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) - T - C 63(X) + 1 20 45 - 32-3 AST Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.21(X) = 224 ADT n nn Peak H (vph) - T - n 35(X) + 4 2 93 - 2-6 vph g / 1-9 2 0% Cater/ 76% Exit - AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.41(X) = 15 vph 4 / 11 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = T-n49(X) i 735- 23vp# �4/.g Flo/ Enter/ 38 Exit - PM Peak Hour (vph) - T = 0.52(X) = 19 vph 12 / 7 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit Page 93 of 745 Existing + Committed Road Network Table 2 provides a detail of the surrounding E + C road network and their respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. The principal road that will provide access to the site is Golden Gate Parkway. Golden Gate Parkway varies between a four -lane to a six -lane divided urban arterial. The road functions as a primary east/west interconnect between its eastern terminus at Collier Boulevard and its western terminus at U.S. 41. Within proximity of the site, Golden Gate Parkway is six -lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. It is noted that Collier County Government has initiated a corridor study for Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of identifying operational improvements that could be completed to improve traffic flow and safety measures as well as increase capacity along the subject corridor. Although this project does not significantly impact the specific link of concern, the Applicant welcomes any and all improvements that will improve capacity, safety and traffic flow. Project Traffic Distribution The site -generated trips were distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, and the location of surrounding retail and office commercial and medical land use areas, and recreational attractions and location of school sites. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Table 2 also depicts the project traffic by directional volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. 8 Page 94 of 745 a_ Poinciana School It Estuary Dr i I Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Road v I °o Y 1 I ' I I 3 ' NORTH 0 p N.T.S. I a. a I 1 po t °of C 0 I- O o O, I O J i ml OI CI o I 00 �' I I ' I ' 2�� I � co co co 457- 'k� 6►4� 15i GoldenGate Parkway �Longboat Drive Golden ate Pa waynd St SW Clipper Way Mercantile Avenue 9\0 N I Outrigger Lane v o I % N Progress Age nue �o ` (nn s N orseshoe Dr N. o ._ 0 I o Domestic Av nue a>, ` `O I orseshoe Dr S. c a N Enterprise - m -anue -r_ Enterprise Ave 2 I s Airport Exchange Avenue N E I INap o U Propspect Ave I Devonshire Blvd _------__ Radio�Road—____---_ Rdi_— ___—_ — o Naples Airport ' c c 0 North Road ' LEGEND JMTRAN51-❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, ING. O�10 Project Traffic Distribution Project Gateway/ Project -Generated FIGURE 2 J .7 Traffic Distribution July 23, 2025 e 1 Page 95 of 745 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non-Feak Direction (vph) _ Golden Gate Pkwy EC-TCMA 20.2 EC-TCMA 21.a EC-TCMA 21.b EC-TCMA 22.0 Santa Barbara Blvd 76.0 EC-TCMA 77.0 Livingston to 175 1-75 to 60th St SW 60th St SW to Santa Barbara Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 12 Entering 7 Exiting LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS (vphpd) % Dist. v h d Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 6D E 3550 45.0% 5 E 3 w 2% 0.14% NO 6D E 3300 60.0% 7 E 4 w 2% 0.21 % NO 6D E 3300 40.0% 5 w 3 E 2% 0.15% NO 4D D 1980 15.0% 2 W 1 E 2% 0.10% NO 4D D 2100 5% 1 S 0 N 2% 0.05% NO 6D E 3100 20% 2 N 1 S 2% 0.06% NO Page 96 of 745 2024 thru 2028 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2024 thru 2028 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2024 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2028 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2024 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2028 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2028 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2024 thru 2028 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. 9 Page 97 of 745 Golden Gate Pkwy TABLE 3 2024 & 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2028 2028 Peak Hour 2024 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v( phpd) DiR AUIR (vphpd) (vphpd) v(u uh d) 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 Page 98 of 745 TABLE 4 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Fir Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v h d LOS v( phpd) Dir LOS v h d Dir (vph) Dir v h d (vphpd) v/c Ratio LOS Golden Gate Pkwy 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 C 2544 E C 7 E 17 W 2548 3300 0.77 C 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 C 2544 E C "i W 3 E 2549 3300 0.77 C Page 99 of 745 Support Documents APPENDIX 10 Page 100 of 745 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHDOLOGY Project Gateway (Collier County, Florida) July 23, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27a3❑ (JMB PR OJ EOT No. SS061 3) AA1 Page 101 of 745 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:7-23-2025 Time: Location: Collier County Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) Study Preparer• Preparer's Name and Title: James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 (239 2767 Reviewer(s) Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Project Gateway Location: Southwest corner of 62" d and 60d' St SW Land Use Type: Multi -Family ITE Code #: LUC 220 Proposed number of development units: 36 multi -family dwelling Other: Description: Zoning: Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached htlpsYld.docs.tive.netl8481204edbdac2cb/DeskioplProjectsl250613 Project Gateway/MethodologyReport.doc NM ?. Page 102 of 745 Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier County's 5-year CIP. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment (See Table 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate. Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is greater. https.Ild.docs.live.netl8481204erlbdac2cblDesktopIProjectsl25O6i3 Project Gateway/MethcdologyReportdoc ih 3 Page 103 of 745 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee X Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant httpslld.docs.live.neN8481204edbdac2cblBesktoplProjectsl250613 Project GatewaylMerhodologyRepod.doc ) ,+ Page 104 of 745 Poinciana School Dr Golden Gate Parkway Longboat Drive Clipper Way 1 Mercantile Avenue Outrigger Lane -aa Progress a ue � Horseshoe Dr N. -a ao� a Domestic Av nue a) Horseshoe Dr S. - o Enterorise Ave 1 Enterprise 4. nue o Napl s Airport 1 txcnange Av Propspect Ave T ----in o Naples Airport c I c o JMTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Project Gateway i Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Road v a e Of I e I Y I 1 I I e J I e ; NORTH 0 O N.T.S. a n 3 Lr) I 0 o 0 IC) I ° c I a O � O+ C_ J I : e I I ' ' U) U) cn I in cn I O 00 t0 'q- n UJ (O (O Golden Gate Parkway e 2nd St SW 3 e U) in i o L I I `I 15 _ 1 o +r— e I e IDevonshire Blvd �Radio Road Radio Road -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — Road July 23, 2025 LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 6-LANE ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 /A !� Page 105 of 745 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Project Gateway Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 36 Units Land Use Trip Generation Equation Code Trip Period (Based upon S.F.) Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 flail„ Traffic (ADT) — T — 6.41(X) + 75.31 — 3" A )T Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.74(X) — 243 ADT A.A.A. DPea k HAU U r (..P — T — 021 (X) i 22.95 — -34 PA T 8 2-6 vo 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.40(X) = 14 vph 3 / 11 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = DMA Peak How (vph) — T — 0.43(X) i 20-5:5 — WP�h 2-3 13 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.51(X) = 18 vph 11 / 7 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = AA � Page 106 of 745 Poinciana School Dr a- t I 0 n i Livingston Woods Ln Kramer 1 Pine Ridge Road 0 I Y I I I � I 00 1 NORTH a N.T.S. n n 3 o I o I , > I � m c ' 0 0 rn I o I c J I 1 ml of o �, in in in in `� I r s s s I I . 5% I r- m Golden Gate Parkway Longboat Drive Cli er Wa Mercantile Avenue Outrigger Lane v o Progress 4enue W Horseshoe Dr N. 5 -o 0 m 0 Domestic A_v nue > Horseshoe Dr S. N m Enterprise Ave Enterprise -6 nue o Napl s Airport 1 txc Propspect Ave o c c Naples Airport o a MTRAN5PORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Project Gateway 45% 6� 0%� 4� 0%� 15�' do do Golden 3ate Parkway 2nd St SW 'I Cn N o L I15 I �r_ I I I I Devonshire Blvd / fit/ Radio Road Radio Road _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — Road LEGEND o= S � Project Tratfic Distribution Project -Generated FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution July 23, 2025 M-7 Page 107 of 745 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) _ Golden Gate Pkwy EC-TCMA 20.2 EC-TCMA 21.a EC-TCMA 21.1b EC-TCMA 22.0 Santa Barbara Blvd 76.0 EC-TCMA 77.0 TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 11 Entering 7 Exiting LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS v( phpd) % Dist. v( phpd) Pk Di (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact Livingston to 175 6D E 3550 45.0% 5 E 3 W 2% 0.11 % NO I-75 to 60th St SW 6D E 3300 60.0% 7 E 4 W 2% 0.12% NO 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 6D E 3300 40.0% 4 W 3 E 2% 0.21 % NO Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd 4D D 1980 15.0% 2 W 1 E 2% 0.10% NO Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 4D D 2100 5% 1 S 0 N 2% 0.03% NO Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 6D E 3100 20% 2 N 1 S 2% 0.06% NO Page 108 of 745 Golden Gate Pkwy TABLE 3 2024 & 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2028 2028 Peak Hour 2024 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v( phpd) DiR AUIR vhd vhd v( phpd) 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 Page 109 of 745 TABLE 4 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v( phpd) LOS v( phpd) Dir LOS v( phpd) Dir (vim Dir of phpd) v( phpd) v/c Ratio LOS Golden Gate Pkwy 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 C 2544 E C 7 E W 2548 3300 0.77 C 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 C 2544 E C W 3 E 2551 3300 0.77 C Page 110 of 745 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPQ at 12:00 P.M. on April 2, 2026, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE URBAN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY FROM ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW 36 MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS, WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND 60TH STREET, EAST OF I-75 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.184: ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20250006066] /RBI AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY IN THE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY AND AIRPORT OVERLAY TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY IN THE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY AND AIRPORT OVERLAY, FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD, TO ALLOW UP TO 36 TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS, WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND 60TH STREET, EAST OF I-75 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.18f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20250006068] Page 111 of 745 ■ n n�Project All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Ordinances will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL 34112, one (1) week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, prior to April 2, 2026. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.collier.gov/Calendar-Events-directory events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting, or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Ray Bellows at 252-2463 or email to Ray.Bellows&collier. gov Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Page 112 of 745 Collier County Planning Commission Joseph K. Schmitt, Chairman Page 113 of 745 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may no be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ELLEN SUMMERS, AICP, SENIOR MANAGER, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBERS PL-20250006066 & PL- 20250006068. {XJUL �lJ�""� — Bowman SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT 950 Encore Way STREET OR P.O. BOX Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr. Manager, Planning & Development Naples, FL 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 11 th day of March 2026, by means of X physical presence or online notarization, by Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development, o is pe own o m or who has produced as identification and who did/did no a e an oath. °SiJY ► "'••. DEBORAH K D'ANGOLA _°• Notary Public - State of Florida o` Commission # HH 741848 Signature of Notary Public A My Comm. Expires Jan 23, 2030 Bonded throw h National Notary Assn. Printed Name of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) Page 114 of 745 'l,• +r r` P qCollierCenter, 3299 Tamiami Trail East. Naples, FL 34112 Kathryn Grigsby, Planner 111: 239-252-2971 era '� � ! i1 � ti � - -L �� .1' � � _ i t � / •'7 � � ++: `'�"'` T `•s� mot ` y �I _ r e�% -.sy' was ti.' +_� �° .t;_ W,,. �� �r'"r `� � � y; � _%y�' . _°°' ti* •�� .- , r / J'\ -'� j�,� K s wji o a.. � � :.-yY .sk� � '� -` nw "✓ . li/ � +` .f .. ', i Y "4 f - �:. ,,. «ti , " # a r y � y� ; r t t -. _ • Fvy- !- � 'kid-`' '. y �, �� . +-�►ti s . +,r _ r; � _,. g a ti � � � M �+ "'" ',ti. � f �= .� 'n�',� � mow' _• ;.�,. - � . V • .� f � } .��, r .., �,+..• r�}'°3's` "►r t aldj � Y �- � f �J` Y �" _ 4I ��" '. ti. i . � i i_ � / _ 4 - Ps•K4{ *s 1•- 4,r"rJ - ,7, rt ,Y d' r1 . ..t_ ' f , R� +,� - ..e.. _ • c_ yL'• ° -. ��f;, ��'�157i'�jr' r +"�!`_ �+}n -. `�\"'.�-.` it Ptiq ,. •" A _'ti`--L.,1 _ p. `+�"e ��; 1.7 L 1` GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY160TH ST RESIDENTIAL 'PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SUBDISTRICT SMALL SCALEt GROWTHD Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center, Third Floor 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Kathryn Grigsby, Planner 111: 239-252-2971 may. i _ fie- f " T� . // _ �•f �/�,G/{ I + S j ..� y �".�%�'! r a_ 4 ���+����r 1 ; `` ji � � '^Fh . N' �I. -� i y ��! ` y' �f.� - .,��' �r .^JJ I C �.+ '.1.- - . s.��,_J •A -yy�'y Gam.+ -a.;: 1.P '�.'.� * h Y+' - _y`-. 'Y` _ 'Y',t`f-' - 4 y%��}�'.. [�k/h-'.:5, h• i�• t�a'�""!'� e. !a�,.'�f� *�>� iC� r k ` a' \� � ��-� � � k/ "��� •ri`'� 1�.. F� �4 �i.9�✓' - , �.3 ` y .. 4 f _"� �.' � - /'M1 � M,' �.�ti'^ `^ � I .Ft � � �.� ��� `��—�- �-�! P�, r--�� i+:k i � % s- r✓ t c-'}�''���•� trrM " ..��' �.. �,`}7�.�ti % "'� --,` ��P E � t�.�� >y � � !`y`�l�l' •i '\•}`,� +J�. } �.,..-. max' Ya � .� �1' "`��iF � _"'%` -.. ::ir. l• t+[ .F '�} _..fr ..-•—�,�id.-:'- �C/ tk=�r'. � \°'�c�=�` $t,sr _ ,�3e�'�`I,: �'�5=i�ii.•rti.:�i���., ,ff '�C 4/2/2026 Item # 9.13 ID# 2026-575 PL20250006068-Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD - The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider rezoning t4.18 acres from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD to allow up to 36 townhouse dwelling units with Affordable Housing. The subject property, consisting of ±4.18 acres, is located partially within the Corridor Management Overlay and within the Airport Overlay on the south side of 62nd Street S.W. and Golden Gate Parkway, and on the west side of 60th Street S.W., east of I-75, in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM, Planner III] (Companion item to GMPA- PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Golden Gate Parkway - 60th Street PUD Staff Report 3-5-26B 2. Attachment A -Proposed PUD Ordinance - 030226 3. Attachment B-NIM Documents 4. Attachment C-Application 5. Affidavit of Posting Notice and Photos of PH Signs (03-11-2026) Page 117 of 745 -Z) Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: APRIL 2, 2026 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) COMPANION TO GMPA-PL20250006066, GATEWAY HOUSING SUBDISTRICT PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Property Owner: Applicant: Anna R. Mongillo Michael Puchalla, Executive Director 103 Beechwood Drive Collier County Community Land Trust Southington, CT 06489 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 109 Naples, FL 34105 Agents: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, and Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager Bowman Consulting Group 950 Encore Way, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34110 Zach Lombarto, Esquire Woodward, Pires & Lombarto, PA, Attorneys at Law 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider rezoning 7L4.18 acres from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD to allow up to 36 townhouse dwelling units with Affordable Housing. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 1 of 14 Page 118 of 745 LN Painted Leaf 1,,N PROJECT LOCATION Location Map CIR Ba he LN Golden ate rKWY UULU 62nd ST 60 SITE LOCATION E #i �4 dS 1 Petition dumber, PL20250006068 Page 2 of 14 Zoning Map 1�1 �f�, y�lY�i�lI1I1Z.YIZ.YC�K�7 � �7 � \ [eiG\ � � �G1 C7 ►\I �I/�\7L:YIj � : E.] � .7 � � ■ .71�1 March 5, 2026 Page 119 of 745 LANDLW9AVIAFtf aedr PTKK AC t MmW10L 341 9i.7ii14 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY OGT ROWF 1Jiti iia 10i17r c1P@19PMC€SIM�IAwd 63Nb ST. SW 00 R CrW) P'RQKRTY� DOUNDARY mxmgnq Qamvmp*4** 10, I --- I a IV 'FK%L CALCULAT014 FOR TYPE 'D' , \ THE CPEN SPACE SFiKLL DuFFER BE PROVIDED A7 THE TII~iE I ISEE EXHIBIT F, OF SW OR PLAT. COMMITMENT F.2) "SEE DEVIATION PI IDWECOPMENT NOTES 1. PfMSERVE REOUIREVENT: a. EX. NATrVE YEGETATICAk = 3.68 AC. b. MIN. RPOUIREDPI IDED (10%) = 0 W AC c PRESER* REEPUMEMENT SHALL BE FULfILLED OFP n 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 39 A,FFORiDABLE HOU5IHG MULTI -FAMILY DWELLINO UHIT$ ZONING: ESTATES CITRRENT USE EiESIDENTL4L PROPERTY BOUNDARY DRY DETFN 1 • 1 g ado FCAIN0.ESTATES = CURRENTUSE I CommimItY FACAUTY ROP IO,HT UwAY DRY DETENTMO-n A,C -, II ENHMCED 29 TYPE 'C" LANDSCAPEBUFFER t ' {SEE EMIBIT F. COMMITMENT F_i j �I i II RNALACDfS5 UYAT" WILL BE DETERFAMIED AT TIME Of PLAT OR SW i EN HANGED 25' ' TYPE'G" PROPERTY LAt4DSC,APE BUFFER BOk1NWY {SFE EXHIBIT F. CCO MITM!ENT F 11 ZONING- ESTATES CLMENT tISE RESJDENTL46L 1V TYRE W SUFFER (SEE EX WT F. COM101TTMENT F,2) PIFR I V ..NDARY 6M .w� Nwl �� i�l.'4 Tblfii L GOLDEN GATE PARKWAYl 7"Bavvmn i 60TH ST. #SPUD " Rr MASTER PLM 7 aQMo-oa�t-aarwr�yaa-ic MASTER PLAN PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD Page 3 of 14 March 5, 2026 Page 120 of 745 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of ±4.18 acres, is located partially within the Corridor Management Overlay and within the Airport Overlay on the south side of 62nd Street S.W. and Golden Gate Parkway, and on the west side of 60th Street S.W. in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks to rezone f4.18 acres of vacant land located within an Airport Overlay with an (E) zoning designation to the Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD to allow for 36 townhouse dwelling units at a density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre. All of the dwelling units will be affordable housing. Up to a maximum of 19 dwelling units will be available to households earning up to and including 80% of the County's Area Median Income (AMI). Up to a maximum of 17 dwelling units may be available to households earning up to and including 120% of the Average Median Income (AMI). See Attachment A — Proposed PUD Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: 62nd Street SW, a local road, then Golden Gate Parkway, a 6-lane divided minor arterial road, then a health care facility with a zoning designation of Estates (E) East: 60th Street SW, a local road, then a church with a zoning designation of (E) South: A single-family residence with a zoning designation of (E) West: A single-family residence with a zoning designation of (E) AERIAL PHOTO PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 4 of 14 Page 121 of 745 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Estates (Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict) as identified in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element (RGGE S-E) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Collier County GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and found that the subject rezone petition is not currently consistent with the GMP. Approval of this PUD Rezone petition is contingent upon the approval of the companion GMPA-PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict, that provides for the requested residential density. For further information, please refer to the companion Gateway Housing Subdistrict GMPA Staff Report. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's December 3, 2025, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has a significant impact if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff findings: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed Project Gateway/ Golden Gate Parkway & 60th Street PUDZ will generate +/- 18 PM peak hour trips on the adjacent roadway, Golden Gate Parkway. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 5 of 14 Page 122 of 745 Roadway/Link Link Current Peak Projected P.M 2024 Level 2024 Hour Peak Peak of Service Remaining Direction Hour/Peak (LOS) Capacity Volume/Peak Direction Direction Project Traffic 1 Golden Gate I-75 to Santa 3,300/EB 5/EB C 940 Parkway/2 1.0 Barbara Blvd Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is December 3, 2025; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2024 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental review staff have found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 3.68 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.37 acres (10%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP, subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who, in turn, use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 0.37 acres (10% of 3.68 acres). The preservation requirement will be met off -site in accordance with LDC 3.05.07.H. Lf No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus); however, no evidence was found indicating trees were being utilized. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review because it does not fall within the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 6 of 14 Page 123 of 745 Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the Golden Gate wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Developer commitments are listed in "EXHIBIT F" of the Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. RPUD document under the "UTILITIES" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. School Review: School review has been requested; staff has no comments. Stormwater Review: The proposed RPUD request is not anticipated to create a stormwater management problem for the area. The site has no existing South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP); this will be required prior to any proposed change in land use or development. That process will ensure consistency with all applicable state stormwater standards. In addition, site development approval (SDP and/or Plat) will be required from Collier County to ensure that local development standards are maintained and that proposed stormwater system(s) are designed consistent with relevant LDC and County Ordinances for water quality and water quantity, during both the interim construction phase and final implementation. Housing Policy & Economic Development Review: The development proposes to include 100% of the 36 residential units as "Affordable Rent -to -Own". While the units are rented, 19 will be restricted to households at and below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). The remaining 17 will be restricted to households at and below 120% of Area Median Income (AMI). If homes are subsequently sold to existing renters, they will be limited to 140% AML If homes are sold to new buyers, they will be limited to 120% AMI. For reference, the 2025 Florida Housing Finance Corporation Income Limits are: 2025 Collier County Income and Rent Limits for Affordable Housing Income Limit by Number of People in Unit Rent Lim itbyNumber ofBedrooms inUnit 2a25 PercentageAr- Medan In- Category Name 1 2 4 1 2 3 Collier 30% Extremety Low $ 23,880 $ 27,270 $ 34,080 $ 639 $ 767 $ 886 county 50% Very Low $ 39,800 $ 45,450 $ 56,800 $ 1,065 $ 1,278 $ 1,476 Median 60% n/a $ 47,760 $ 54,540 $ 68,160 $ 1,278 $ 1,534 $ 1,772 Household 80% Low $ 63,680 $ 72,720 $ 90,880 $ 1,705 $ 2,046 $ 2,363 Income 100% Median $ 79,600 $ 90,900 $ 113,600 $ 2,131 $ 2,557 $ 2,953 $113,600 120% Moderate $ 95,520 $ 109,080 $ 136,320 $ 2,557 $ 3,069 $ 3,544 140% Gap $ 111,440 $ 127,260 $ 159,040 1 $ 2,983 $ 3,580 $ 4,135 PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 7 of 14 Page 124 of 745 A Restrictive Covenant will be recorded on the affordable units requiring them to be initially and subsequently rented or sold to qualifying households for a period of 30-years from the Certificate of Occupancy of each unit. The need for affordable housing units is great in Collier County, as the University of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing reports that there are currently 51,368 cost -burdened households in Collier County, with 25,687 of those spending more than 50% of their monthly income on housing expenses. The Median home sales price in Collier County is $570,000 (single-family homes: $750,000; condos: $435,000), NABOR Market Report, Dec 2025. Prices in Naples have increased by 73% since pre-COVID levels. 63% of sales are cash deals, according to the NABOR Market Report, Feb 2025. The Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI) for December 2025 was $2,709, according to the University of Florida Schimberg Center for Housing Studies. Approval of this development will assist Collier County in addressing the continued need for affordable housing. Zoning and Land Development Review: As previously stated, the request is to rezone the property from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit (RPUD) zoning district to allow for the development of 36 multi -family residential units at 8.6 dwelling units per acre with affordable housing. Zoning staff have evaluated the proposed use related to intensity and compatibility. The proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre is calculated based on an affordable housing commitment allowing a maximum of 36 multi -family dwelling units. While the LDC typically requires a minimum PUD area of 10 acres, the subject site qualifies for a smaller area of 4.18 acres under the Infill Parcels provision in LDC 4.07.02.A. The subject site shares at least two common boundaries with parcels that are developed. There is a single-family residence to the west of the subject site and a single-family residence to the south of the subject site. The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned building height of 35 feet and an actual building height of 42 feet, which is similar to the Estates zoned building height of 30 feet. The proposed landscape buffers exceed the minimum code. A 15-foot-wide Type B landscape buffer (trees 25 feet on center and a 6-foot-high hedge, fence, or wall) is required along the internal west and south property lines. The petitioner has proposed a wider and enhanced 25-foot-wide Type C landscape buffer (double row of trees 30 feet on center and a 6-foot-high hedge, fence, or wall). A minimum of 50% of the buffer area will have additional meandering beds of shrubs and groundcovers other than grass. The existing native trees will be retained in the buffer area as well. Along the public roadways, the required Type D landscape buffer (trees at 30 feet on center and a hedge when adjacent to a vehicular use area) will be enhanced with a 30" high hedge. The hedge will be maintained at a minimum height of 6 feet. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 8 of 14 Page 125 of 745 recommendation to the BCC, who, in turn, use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies, and.future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this petition and has found it not consistent with the GMP. Approval of this PUD Rezone petition is contingent upon the companion GMPA-PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict, that provides for the requested residential density. Therefore, the PUD may only be found consistent with the GMPA if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential and institutional. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The cost of housing has increased 73% from pre-COVID prices. The proposed rezone will meet the need for affordable housing in Collier County. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. It is staff s opinion that the proposed change will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is compatible with adjacent land uses. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As previously stated, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 9 of 14 Page 126 of 745 The proposed PUD Rezone will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the environmental resource permitting requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Rezone will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure that light and air are not seriously reduced in adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of the proposed lake and open space areas should ensure that light and air are not seriously reduced in adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff found no evidence that the proposed PUD Rezone will adversely affect property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The properties to the east, south, and west are developed. The property to the north (on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway) is developed and is undergoing additional building construction. The properties to the north and south are undergoing building construction. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP approval process and PPL process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner, as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed PUD rezone can be found consistent with the LDC and the GMP, subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA. Thus, the proposed change can be deemed to be in alignment with public welfare and not a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with the current zoning. However, the applicant proposes to provide 100% affordable housing (36 residential units), which will contribute towards satisfying an affordable housing deficiency in Collier County. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed change is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed change will address the county's affordable housing needs. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 10 of 14 Page 127 of 745 There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the proposed uses; however, the subject site is located near the only I-75 interchange that is predominantly residential. This location provides residences within the subject PUD easy access to employment opportunities throughout the county. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration that would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or PPL processes, and as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for the jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff have concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments to minimize impact to the Level of Service (LOS). 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to further demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including, but not limited to, any plats and/or site development plans. Water and wastewater mains are available along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 11 of 14 Page 128 of 745 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. There is a companion GMPA petition, PL GMPA-PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict, that provides for the requested residential density. Therefore, the PUD may only be found consistent with the GMPA if the GMPA is approved and becomes effective. 4. The internal and external compatibility ofproposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. Staff has concluded that this Rezone will not change the project's compatibility, both internally and externally. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas inexistence and as proposed to serve the development. The petitioner has requested a deviation from the required 60% open space requirement to provide an alternative 40% open space. For further information, see the Deviations section of this Staff Report. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Water and wastewater mains are available along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. 7. The ability of the subjectproperty and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The property is proposed to accommodate 36 residential dwelling units. No intentions are indicated for future expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 12 of 14 Page 129 of 745 similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking one deviation related to open space. Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviation. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the LDC's requirements. The deviation is directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Deviation #1 Deviation #1 requests relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1, Open space requirements, which states PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses shall provide at least 60 percent of the gross area devoted to usable open space, instead allow 40 percent of the gross area be devoted to usable open space. Petitioner's Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation: The proposed 40% open space deviation is justified. Project Gateway RPUD will be developed on approximately 4.18 acres of land and will construct up to 36 multifamily dwelling units in the form of townhouses that will act as income -restricted affordable housing, for which the demand is well -documented. The applicant is proposing a project that has comparable building heights to the adjacent residential zoning districts. Due to the parcel size and the need to provide individual driveways to each townhouse, meeting the 60% usable open space standard would render the site unusable at the proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has proposed enhanced landscape buffers adjacent to the Estate zoning located on the south and west portions of the development. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 3, 2025, at New Hope Ministries, Banquet Hall, located at 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida. Approximately 25 residents and two residents attended the meeting virtually via ZOOM, along with the physical presence of the Agent's team. For further information, see Attachment C NIMDocuments. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on April 2, 2026. RECOMMENDATION: PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 13 of 14 Page 130 of 745 Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDZ PL20250006068, Golden Gate Parkway/60TH Street RPUD, to the BCC with a recommendation of approval, subject to the approval of the companion GMPA petition PL20250006066, Gateway Housing Subdistrict. Attachments: Attachment A -Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B-NIM Documents Attachment C-Application PUDZ-PL20250006068, GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 14 of 14 Page 131 of 745 ORDINANCE NO. 2026- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY IN THE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY AND AIRPORT OVERLAY TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT PARTLY IN THE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT OVERLAY AND AIRPORT OVERLAY, FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD, TO ALLOW UP TO 36 TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS, WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND 60TH STREET, EAST OF I-75 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.18E ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20250006068] WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Ellen Summers, AICP of Bowman Consulting, and Zachary W. Lombardo, Esq. of Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A., representing Collier County Community Land Trust petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property more particularly described in Exhibit A, located in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Estates (E) Zoning District partly in the Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District partly in the Corridor Management Overlay and Airport Overlay for a [25-CPS-02682/2004962/1197 Project Gateway / PL20250006068 3/2/26 1 of 2 Page 132 of 745 4.18+/- acre project to be known as Golden Gate Parkway/601h Street RPUD Rezone, to allow up to 36 townhouse dwelling units, with affordable housing, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2026- becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - [25-CPS-02682/2004962/1197 Project Gateway / PL20250006068 3/2/26 day of , 2026. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA List of Permitted Uses List of Development Standards Master Plan Legal Description List of Deviations List of Developer Commitments 2 of 2 Dan Kowal, Chairman Page 133 of 745 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60th St. RPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES Regulations for the development of the RPUD shall be in accordance with the content of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A. Principal Use: 1. Multi -family dwelling units, including townhouses, not to exceed 36 total dwelling units subject to Exhibit F, Paragraph E —Affordable Housing Commitments. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this RPUD. 2. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents only, such as swimming pools, fitness centers, sports courts, and clubhouse/recreation buildings. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including parking structures, gazebos, fountains, trellises, signage, entry gates and gatehouses, and similar structures. 4. Stormwater management treatment, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms, swales, and outfall structures. Page 1 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 134 of 745 EXHIBIT B GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/601h St. RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Residential Development Standards The table below sets forth the development standards for the uses within the Golden Gate Parkway/60th St. RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. LOT AREA N/A N/A MIN. LOT WIDTH N/A N/A MIN. FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F. N/A MINIMUM YARDS' (EXTERNAL — MEASURED FROM THE PUD BOUNDARY) NORTH PROPERTY LINE 25' SPS SOUTH PROPERTY LINE 30' SPS EAST PROPERTY LINE 25' SPS WEST PROPERTY LINE 30' SPS MIN. SETBACK FROM 62ND STREET SW 25' SPS MIN. INTERNAL SETBACKS FOR TOWNHOUSES FRONT YARD 20' SPS SIDE YARD 0' SPS REAR YARD 25' SPS PRESERVE SETBACKS 25' 10, MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10, SPS MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ZONED 35' SPS ACTUAL 42' SPS N/A - not applicable; SPS - same as principal structures; S.F - square feet. 1. Lakes and water management facilities may be reduced to 15 feet from the PUD boundary. 2. Setbacks must comply with the required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures provided in the Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article III of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances Page 2 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 135 of 745 LAND USESUMdARY DESMFrn0N - % FM BUAL 1 3.15 1 75.36% MTXPF0PER1Yj 4.16 1 10M. OPEN SPACES JMIARY* F13DUnRED(40%) PFmVID®)40°h):F iF 1.67 1 1.67 "FINAL CALCULATION FOR THE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT. '"SEE DEVIATION #1 DEVELOPMENT NOTES: EXHIBIT C GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (10Y ROW) 62ND ST. SW (60' ROW) PROPERTY BOUNDARY C n� 10, ! TYPE "D" _ BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, OMMITMENT F.2) o PRESERVE REQUIREMENT: j a. EX. NATIVE VEGETATION = 3.68 AC. b. MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED DRY DETENTION 0.23 AC (10%) = 0,37 AC c. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT SHALL BE FULFILLED OFFSITE I MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 36 ENHANCED 25' AFFORDABLE HOUSING TYPE "C" MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, ZONING: ESTATES COMMITMENT F.1) CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FINAL ACCESS LOCATION BOUNDARY WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAT OR SDP ENHANCED 25' TYPE "C" PROPERTY LANDSCAPE BUFFER BOUNDARY (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT F.1) ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL DRY DETENTION 0.08 AC ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE COMMUNITY FACILITY 30' RIGHT OF WAY 10, TYPE "D" BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT F.2) BOUNDARY GRAPHIC SCALE o I�a (I1 FEET) SCALE. V - 30' GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY! �r� — Bowman 60TH ST. RPUD MASTER PLAN Page 3 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 136 of 745 EXHIBIT D GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/601h St. RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL OF TRACT 49, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3210, PAGE 750, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. COMPRISING A TOTAL OF 4.18 ACRES. Page 4 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 137 of 745 EXHIBIT E GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/601h St. RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS The deviation requests relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1, Open space requirements, which states PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses shall provide at least 60 percent of the gross area devoted to usable open space to instead allow 40 percent of the gross area be devoted to usable open space. Page 5 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 138 of 745 EXHIBIT F GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/601h St. RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purpose of this section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. A. GENERAL 1. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for RPUD monitoring until close-out of the RPUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all RPUD commitments until close-out of the RPUD. At the time of this RPUD approval, the Managing Entity is Collier County Community Land Trust. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released from its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to the County that includes an acknowledgment of the commitment required by the RPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the RPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of RPUD commitments. 2. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligation imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 125.022, FS) 3. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. B. TRANSPORTATION 1. The maximum total daily trip generation for the RPUD shall not exceed 18 two- way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 2. Access to the project site will be available at the ingress/egress along 60th Street SW. Page 6 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 139 of 745 C. UTILITIES 1. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined by the County Manager or Designee during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. 2. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the water distribution/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow to the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined by the County Manager or Designee during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. 3. The dumpster enclosure shall maintain a minimum distance of 250 feet from the south property line of the PUD. D. LIGHTING 1. All lighting facilities shall be architecturally designed, and lighting shall be limited to a maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses and utilize International Dark Skies Association best practices. E. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITMENTS 1. The Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. RPUD shall provide 100% of the total dwelling units as affordable units with the option of renting the units or selling the units subject to the requirements herein for a period of 30 years from the date of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy (the "Restricted Period"). 2. Affordable Rental Dwelling Units: a. Up to a maximum of nineteen (19) of the dwelling units shall be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are Page 7 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 140 of 745 up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County at rents that are no more than 80% AMI rent limits. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on the income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. b. Up to a maximum of seventeen (17) of the dwelling units may be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County at rents that are no more than the 120% of AMI rent limits. Income and rent limits may be adjusted annually based on the income and rent limit table published by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation or as otherwise provided by Collier County. C. By way of example, the 2025 Florida Housing Finance Corporation Income and Rent Limits are: 2025 Collier County Income and Rent Limits for Affordable Housing Inc ome limit by Number of People in Unit Rent limit by Number of Bedrooms in Unit 2025 Percentage Arm Medan hco- Category Name 1 2 4 1 2 3 Collier 30% ErremevLoer $ 23,880 $ 27,270 $ 34,080 $ 639 $ 767 $ 886 County 50% Very tow $ 39,800 $ 45,450 $ 56,800 $ 1,065 $ 1,278 $ 1,476 Median 60% n+a $ 47,760 $ 54,540 $ 68,160 $ 1,278 $ 1,534 $ 1,772 Household 80% tow $ 63,680 $ 72,720 $ 90,880 $ 1,705 $ 2,046 $ 2,363 Income 100% Median $ 79,600 $ 90,900 $ 113,600 $ 2,131 $ 2,557 $ 2,953 $113,600 120% Moderate $ 95,520 $ 109,080 $ 136,320 $ 2,557 $ 3,069 $ 3,544 140% Gap $ 111,440 $ 127,260 $ 159,040 $ 2,983 $ 3,580 $ 4,135 Source: HUD 2025 Median income; Flor da Housng Finance Corp. income and Rent lm is 3. Affordable Owner -Occupied Dwelling Units: Any of the 36 dwelling units may be Affordable Housing Owner -Occupied dwelling units. a. Any Affordable Housing Dwelling Unit may be sold to a household that rented the unit in accordance with Section 2 above provided the household's certified income prior to closing on the sale are up to and including 140% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. b. Any affordable housing dwelling unit may be sold to a household whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. C. By way of example, the 2025 Florida Housing Corporation Income Limits are: Page 8 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 141 of 745 2025 Collier County Median Houseshold Income $113,600 Percentage AMI Categorgy Name Income Limit by Number of Persons in Household 1 2 3 4 30% 50% Extremely Low 23,900 27,300 30,700 34,100 Very Low 39,800 45,450 51,150 56,800 80% Low 63,650 72,750 81,850 90,900 100% Median 79,600 90,900 102,300 113,600 120% Moderate 1 95,520 109,080 122,760 136,320 140% Gap 111,440 1 127,260 1 143,220 1 159,040 Source: HUD 2025 Median Income; Florida Housing Finance Corp. Income and Rent Lmits d. Upon death of a qualifying owner of an affordable housing owner -occupied dwelling unit after closing on the purchase of the unit, the ownership of the affordable housing owner -occupied dwelling unit may transfer to the heir of the owner, and the heir will not be subject to the affordable housing restrictions in this Section E. for the duration of the heir's ownership of the dwelling unit. 4. Households shall occupy the property as their primary residence. For owner - occupied units, maintenance of homestead exemption is evidence of compliance. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for any of the dwelling units, the owner will record a restrictive covenant in the public records of Collier County identifying all units as affordable units and the various income threshold applicable to the units. The covenant will state that each unit, when rented and/or sold, will be initially and subsequently rented and/or sold to qualifying parties or, if sold, transferred to qualifying heirs of qualifying parties for a period of 30 years from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each unit. The covenant will also state that at least 30 days prior to the initial rental or sale or subsequent rental or sale of any unit, the County's Community and Human Services Division, or its designee, will be notified in writing and provided documents for income verification and certification on forms acceptable to Collier County. The closing on any sale may occur after the County, or its designee, confirms that the household qualifies for the designated income thresholds. The covenant may state that each sale from the developer may include a right of first refusal for the developer for subsequent affordable rental or sale. 6. Income verification and certification for households or household members shall be based on the most recent year's tax return, unless otherwise provided herein. Income verification and certification for households or household members who had not filed the most recent year's tax return may be based on written verification to verify all regular sources of income to the household member. The written verification shall include, at a minimum, the purpose of the verification, a statement to release information, employer verification of gross annual income or rate of pay, Page 9 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 142 of 745 number of hours worked, frequency of pay, bonuses, tips, and commissions and a signature block with the date of verification. The verification shall be valid for up to 90 days prior to occupancy. Upon expiration of the 90-day period, the information may be verbally updated form the original sources for an additional 30 days, provided it has been documented by the person preparing the original verification. After this time, a new verification form must be completed. 7. As part of the annual PUD monitoring report, the developer will include an annual report that provides the progress and monitoring of occupancy of the income - restricted units, including rent data for rental units and homestead data for owner - occupied units, in a format approved by the Collier County Community and Human Services Division. The developer agrees to annual on -site monitoring by the County, or its designee. F. LANDSCAPING 1. An enhanced 25 foot wide Type C landscape buffer abutting the west and south property lines shall be provided consistent with the Master Plan. The enhancements shall include a minimum 50% of the 25-foot-wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within the 25-foot-wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention/detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in a natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. 2. The minimum code required Type D landscape buffer hedge shall be a minimum of 3-foot height at planting and maintained at a minimum height of 6 feet. G. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. The Owner shall adhere to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Black Bear Management Plan, as applicable. The informational brochure created by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and titled "A Guide to Living in Bear County" will be distributed to future homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel. Residents will be provided with information on how to secure their garbage containers to discourage bears from foraging in trash receptacles and the project will utilize bear -proof dumpsters in locations to be determined at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) approval. All costs, including maintenance, of bear -proof containers will be borne by the Owner. 2. Native vegetation preservation will be mitigated off -site at time of SDP. Page 10 of 10 Golden Gate Parkway 60th St. RPUD (PL-20250006068)(02-26-2026)_ Page 143 of 745 Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. RPUD Rezone (PL20250006068) and SSGMPA (PL20250006066) November 3, 2025, 5:30 PM New Hope Ministries — Banquet Hall 7675 Davis Boulevard Naples, Florida 34104 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: PL-20250006068 (Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. RPUD) — The applicant proposes to rezone the Property from the Estates zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The proposed RPUD seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre. PL-20250006066 (Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. Residential Subdistrict) — The applicant proposes a companion Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to establish the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict by amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The proposed SSGMPA seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Property Owner: Anna R. Mongillo Applicant: Collier County Community Land Trust Attendees on Behalf of the Applicant: Ellen Summers, AICP, Bowman Michael Puchalla, Collier County Community Land Trust Matthew Smith, Build to Rent to Own, LLC Patrick Korth, Build to Rent to Own, LLC Zachary W. Lombardo, Esq., Woodward, Pires & Lombardo James Banks, P.E., JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Summary: There were approximately 25 members of the public physically in attendance and 2 members of the public in attendance via Zoom. Ellen Summers provided a presentation on the proposed Golden Gate Parkway/60t" St. RPUD and companion Golden Gate Parkway/60`" St. Residential Subdistrict. The presentation lasted approximately 18 minutes. Following the presentation, the meeting was opened for comments and questions from members of the public in attendance in person and on Zoom. The following comments and questions were raised, organized by topic (comments and questions from public shown in bold, and responses shown in italics): Sewage and Stormwater: Page 1 of 3 https: //us-partner-i ntegrations.el,myte.con/msoffice/wopiifiles/ 79d4fc4b-4758-4884-985e- 1 155314b41 Ia/WOP►Serviceld_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOP1Userld_223.bowman.egnyte.com/Golden Gate Parkway NIM Summary (11-07- 2025).docx Page 144 of 745 Where are the sewage and stormwater going? There are water and sewer connections across the street from Golden Gate Parkway. We will be connecting to those to serve this site. There is adequate dry detention planned within the site. Are you going to be building septic on -site and well on -site? No, we will be connecting to the Collier County Water and Sewer District facilities across from Golden Gate Parkway and bring the connection onto our site. Flooding: • How much of the property is permeable versus non -permeable? When it comes time to create the site development plan, any impervious areas and stormwater retention areas will have to adhere to Collier County's standards. We will have sufficient stormwater retention. • What will happen to the water from a heavy rainfall? I am worried about our driveways and the roadways being flooded, or the canal being flooded. Our engineers have designed the site to have sufficient dry detention area contained on the site. The site will be designed to have sufficient stormwater detention which will be required to remain on site. • Explain what the dry detention area is in the upper right hand corner of the site plan; is this going to be a pond? This area is not going to be a pond. It will be maintained as a dry detention. Traffic: • What is the impact of this development on the traffic in the area and on 60" Street Southwest? We prepared a traffic study that adheres to the Collier County requirements. The traffic study is based on seasonal traffic data. Collier County is also in the process of re-evaluating their access management plan along Golden Gate Parkway. • When was the data from the traffic study collected? The traffic study data is from 2024. Site Design: • Why is the entrance to the proposed site located adjacent to my property (south of the site) as opposed to the other end of the site? We are required by Collier County staff 'to have it at that location on 60`h Street based on intersection separation requirements. Putting it more north on the site would cause a conflict with Golden Gate Parkway. • Can someone explain to me what happened to the preserve that was in the original documentation at the back southwest corner of the property? In our latest submittal, we had to remove the preserve. The site is 4.18 acres and with existing native vegetation, we are required to maintain 0.37 acres on the site. Within Collier County, if the required preserve area is less than 112 acre, we are allowed to mitigate it offsite. We have elected to mitigate the preservation area offsite. • Are you going to clear out the native vegetation that is at the south of the property? No, our commitment in the PUD is that any of the existing native trees along the 25 foot landscape buffer along the west and south property lines must be retained. In addition to the planting that will be added to enhance the buffer, we are also providing two rows of trees in the buffer along the west and south property lines. • In the original site plan I have downloaded, the dumpster was located where it now says "Type "D" Buffer". Am I going to risk now having the entrance to the site and the dumpsters along my property line? No, we are not proposing to locate the dumpsters at the southern border of site. Dumpster location is determined during the site development plan phase which occurs after this stage of rezoning. Currently, our conceptual site plan has the proposed dumpster location at the north end of the site. Page 2 of 3 https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffi ce/wopi/fi les/79d4fc4b-4758-4884-985 e- 1 155314b41 I a/WOPIServiceld TP EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserld_223.bowman.egnyte.com/Go[den Gate Parkway NIM Summary (11-07- 2025).docx Page 145 of 745 • What does the 42 foot height of the building mean in terms of the structures on my property? The building is going to be 2 stories tall. We are required to identify the zoned and building heights with our plans. The zoned building height, which is 35 feet, is measured from the finished floor elevation to the midpoint of the roof. The actual building height is 42 feet and is measured from the average grade of the road along 60`h Street Southwest to the very peak of the roof. • What about swimming pools, tennis courts, and like facilities that are allowed in this type of community? These are customary accessory uses that we have permitted in the planned unit development. We do not anticipate having any of those accessory uses developed on the site. • Where is overflow parking going to be located? There are garages and driveways that will fulfill the minimum parking requirement for each unit. We will most likely provide additional parking on the northern end of the site. • Will there be any changes to the surrounding sidewalks? At this time, we have not decided whether we will be constructing sidewalks or providing payment in lieu to Collier County. • Are the townhomes one car or two car garage homes? The townhome garages are for one car only. Miscellaneous: • I downloaded plans and documents off of the Collier County Community Land Trust website before it was taken down. Is any of the information and documents that I downloaded still accurate? The documents from the Collier County Community Land Trust website were for Requests for Proposals and were taken down once the deadline was reached. The Request for Proposals is different than what Bowman submits to the County and the submittal documents are public record. • Why put the property here in this residential area? The proposed development is residential. From a planning perspective, this site provides what is needed for the build to rent to own concept. The location is ideal, with it being by Exit 105 and 15 to 20 minutes away from major Collier County employers such as NCH and Arthrex. The client's team did look at a lot ofsites and different development scenarios and this location functioned the best for their intended purpose. • Is the sale still contingent depending on if the rezoning happens? The real estate sale is still in its due diligence period so it is not closed for that reason. It is not necessarily tied to the rezoning of the site. • I understand that the project is geared towards households with teachers, firefighters, and deputies. But after 3 years if the household decides to move out, what happens to the unit? The unit will remain income restricted and the household cannot sell it on the open market. The unit will go back into the income -restricted system that it began in and that we are proposing. The unit can be sold but it has to be to a qualified buyer. The meeting concluded at approximately 7:00 pm. Page 3 of 3 https: //us-partner-integrations.egmyte.com/msoffice/wopif fi les/ 79d4fc4b-4758-4984-985 e- 1155314b41 Ia/WOPIServiceld_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserld_223.bowman.egnyte.com/Golden Gate Parkway NIM Summary (11-07- 2025).docx Page 146 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this November 7, 2025, by means of —,X— physical presence or online notarization, by Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development, Bowman, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. Signature of Notary Public ---b e 6 0 r r, �\ y— Printed Name of Notary (Notary Seal) DEBORAH K D'ANGOIA ip • Notary Public - State of Florida ®�a€ Commission # HH 74 8848 ov rti My Comm. Expires Jan 23, 2030 Bonded through National Notary Assn. Page 147 of 745 LocaliQ Florida PO Box 631244 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1244 GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STEPHANIE KAROL Hole Montes Inc 950 Encore WAY 4 200 Naples FL 34110-9176 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, who on oath says that he or she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Naples Daily News, a newspaper published in Collier County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Ad in the matter of, was published on the publicly accessible website of Collier and Lee Counties, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of, on: NDN Naples Daily News 10/17/2025 Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes. Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the legal clerk, who is personally known to me, on 10/17/2025 Legal Clerk < Notary, State of W11 County of rown 4G,I'l My commission expires Publication Cost: $1003.17 Tax Amount: $0.00 Payment Cost: $1003.17 Order No: 11752710 # of Copies: Customer No: 1125693 1 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Please do not use this form for payment remittance. EVICKY FELTY Notary Public State of Wisconsin Page 1 of 2 Page 148 of 745 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development of Bowman, and Zachary W. Lombardo, Esquire of Woodward Pires & Lombard, PA, on behalf of the applicant at the following time and location: Monday, November 3, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries 7675 Davis Boulevard, Banquet Hall, Naples, Florida 34104 The following applications have been made to Collier County Growth Management Department: 1) RPUD Rezone — PL20250006068 (Project Gateway PUD): The applicant proposes to rezone the Property from the Estates zoning districtto a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The proposed RPUD seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre; and 2) SSGMPA — PL20250006066 (Gateway Housing Subdistrict): The applicant proposes a companion Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to establish the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict by amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The proposed SSGMPA seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre. The subject property is comprised of 4.18± acres and is in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida ("the Property"). The Property is located to the south of Golden Gate Parkway and east of 1-75, at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW. Location Map Project Gateway Bathe Ln Go[ en Gate Pk 3 62nd St Project CV Location CO N rn L O Bass Point Ct A 95o encore way Napbe F13a 110 Piwne (2391294-2000 IBtJWil lafl Fonda Cedd-te of Audro Saeon No 30862 Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the applicant and Collier County staff. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NIM-SWFL@bowman.com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NIM-SWFL@bowman.com. Please reference Project Gateway RPUD & SSGMPA in the subject line. Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development Bowman �_1950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110; Phone: 239-254-2000, email: ESummers@bowman.com Page 149 of 745 Bowman October 17, 2025 Re: RPUD Rezone — PL20250006068 (Project Gateway PUD) SSGMPA — PL20250006066 (Gateway Housing Subdistrict) Bowman File No. 340900-01-001 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Senior Vice President, Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development of Bowman, and Zachary W. Lombardo, Esquire of Woodward Pires & Lombard, PA, on behalf of the applicant, have made the following companion applications to Collier County Growth Management: 1) RPUD Rezone — PL20250006068 (Project Gateway PUD): The applicant proposes to rezone the Property from the Estates zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The proposed RPUD seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre; and 2) SSGMPA — PL20250006066 (Gateway Housing Subdistrict): The applicant proposes a companion Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA) to establish the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict by amending the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The proposed SSGMPA seeks to allow for the development of a maximum of 36 affordable multi -family dwelling units at a density of up to 8.6 du/acre. The subject property is comprised of 4.18± acres and is in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida ("the Property"). The Property is located to the south of Golden Gate Parkway and east of I-75, at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW. Location Map Project Gateway Bathe Ln Golden Gate Pkwv 62n St S 3 in v Project ' CN Loeation� rD to W t 0 W Bass Point Ct N A 950 E— Way Napkf FL34110 Bi� Ptnne:(239) 254-2000 Flonda CeM�gte of Autnonxaoon No. 30/62 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 Bowman.com Va340900 - Coll ter. Build toRent to Own Concept Plan 340900-01-001 (PLN) - Collier -Build toRent to Own Concept PlanTlanning�N IMProperty Owner Letter (10-17-2025).docx Page 150 of 745 I :I 6.1yel i I t;J11 In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you with an opportunity to hear a presentation about these companion petitions and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, November 3, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Ministries, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Banquet Hall, Naples, Florida 34104. The purpose and intent of this Neighborhood Information Meeting is to provide the public with notice of an impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. Zoom is being provided as an option to those unable to attend the meeting in person. However, if technical difficulties arise with Zoom, the technical difficulties will not be grounds to invalidate the meeting. If you would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at NIM-SWFL&bowman.com and we will send zoom invite or a link of the video. You may also email any comments or questions to NIM-SWFLabowman.com. Please reference Proiect Gateway RPUD and SSGMPA in the subject line. Very truly yours, BOWMAN Ellen Summers, AICP Senior Manager, Planning and Development ES/sk 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 Bowman.com V:,340900 - Collier -Budd toRent to Own Concept Plan`340900-01-001 (PLN) - Collier -Build toRent to Own Concept Plan Planning -MWProperty Owner Letter (10-17-2025).docx Page 151 of 745 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD F/K/A PROJECT GATEWAY RPUD (PL-20250006068) GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT F/K/A GATEWAY HOUSING SUBDISTRICT (PL-20250006066) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip, E-Mail Address YL �` tI C, fbre- I lDrewn iocv C cis ,. t/1v11 �,�R �' ►�►'ZC i lr+vl S r' Gc iC �1 rF Page 152 of 745 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD F/K/A PROJECT GATEWAY RPUD (PL-20250006068) GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT F/K/A GATEWAY HOUSING SUBDISTRICT (PL-20250006066) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address 3y(t &7 2223 rr r 4-� h >7 3A he C A (c 5 AL /lL rr l j,1 cka o L. Ge - L, vxJec, I S� 1 ZLAI-b A A wpLfL 117 K If, a .WE Page 153 of 745 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD F/K/A PROJECT GATEWAY RPUD (PL-20250006068) GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT F/K/A GATEWAY HOUSING SUBDISTRICT (PL-20250006066) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY be adv'sed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address fLp'vl M uv -ek -31 .), b .� C,zJ IVa e S -ro a et �, u",n • G� 5 v,4 "u/ C/1Iz to n � 0 6 Z V s w l rL 0�'Le l0 S 2c 6-0IcLg," (Sr,� P/'-_Uw Juctwr �i' re ©Ct7 4 Page 154 of 745 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD F/K/A PROJECT GATEWAY RPUD (PL-20250006068) GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT F/K/A GATEWAY HOUSING SUBDISTRICT (PL-20250006066) MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025 AT 5:30PM PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY * 1>1ease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the County receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the County staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the County web site for additional information. Name Address City, State Zip E-Mail Address 3 K1MW1 W 2c� n-, WOleS Q S W 0 4( r� 6 Iv , .c� S C(L r 0 13ci oc2, ti K It 1e.31 % ,rU ey Page 155 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Page 156 of 745 Collier County GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Notes Rezone to PUD (P Z) COMPANION ITEMS Petition Type: GMP Amendment (GMPA) Date and Time: Wednesday 6/4/2025 1 : 30 pm ZOOM Property Information Nancy Gundlach - PUDZ Assigned Planner: Austin Grubb - GMPA Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 • Project Name: Gateway Housing Subdistrict (GMPA) - PL20250006066 PL #: See above Property ID #: 38164120005 Current Zoning: Estates (E) Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34116 Applicant: Stephanie Karol - Hole Montes, Inc . Agent Name: Ellen Summers,AICP-Bowman Phone: 239-254-2016 Agent/Firm Address: 950 Encore Way City:Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Property Owner: Anna R . Mongi l to Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 4.17 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: 40 Townhomes iii. Proposed # of Affordable Housing Units: TBD iv. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: V. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vii. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: viii. Is Project within an Area of Historical/Archaeological Probability? Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 1 of 5 Growth Management Community Dowlopment . Planning R Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •:Naples, FL 34104 • 239 2s2 2400 • "%%-N%% collicrcount •ll uoc,' Collier County Meeting Notes u N l c ry - Let c h S g C j) Q L 0,, foa QkP.,iLS've L4Nv:IVC p — />1�S7iry C�62k 47Ac• h o 0 A t i— i Cii p5 Ci -v 6)44 4b NoNtt On-r,k)6 — 0_rW_ rlit, 0 ,L. ?,+ G - S L� l>. I Required: The most current Application Forms & the Property Ownership Disclosure Form are required for your submittal. Download from this link: https:Nwww.colliercountyfl.gov/government/growth-management/divisionslplanning-and- zoning_ division/land-use-applications#!I Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 2 of 5 Growth Management Community Development - Planning & Zoninr 2800 North Horseshoe Dri%e - Naplc,, FL 34104 - 239 2i2 2400 - w%% w collicrawntetl.00v% ThomasClarkeVEN From: Nancy Gundlach Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2025 8:32 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) Hi Thomas, We have one recent update that I would like to share with the Agent. In the Commitment section of the PUD Document, please do not have a category labeled "Miscellaneous." Please list the items under the subject, for example, place a lighting commitment under "Lighting." Respectfully, Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM Planner III Zoning Services Division (239)252-2484 Nancv.GundlachPcolliercountvfl.izov 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Coder COUHty Nancy Gundlach AICP, PLA. CSM Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-2484 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Nancy. Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov Z, Collier County 0000M From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 11:31 AM To: Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@coIlie rcountyfl.gov>; Cormac Giblin <Cormac.Giblin@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@collie rcountyfl.gov> Cc: Nancy Gundlach <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) 1Wbe 9 4 - ThomasClarkeVEN From: Austin Grubb Sent: Friday, June 06, 2025 2:16 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre-app notes 7 PA- Attachments: GG Blvd. Affordable Housing PL2025000.pdf PLZUtS XV 6c-14:U Him Sl, /47rWC�+4 U N Austin Grubb Planner III Zoning it Office:239-252-2834 Collier County Horseshoe Drive ©�i Q O Naples, Florida 34104 Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead contact this office by telephone or in writing 1 May 6 2025 GMP Amendment Pre-Aoolication Meeting PL20250006066 Parcel ID 38164120005 Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive // Naples, FL 34104 // Phone: 239-252-2400 The Client Services Office schedules all Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) pre -application meetings, which are mandatory, and coordinates the review of all amendment petitions received. Per the current Fee Schedule (Resolution 2021-193), the non-refundable pre -application meeting fee is $500.00; it is credited towards the petition fee if the petition is submitted within nine months. The petition fee is $16,700.00 for a large-scale petition ($9,000.00 for a small-scale petition), which is non-refundable, plus a proportionate share of the legal advertising costs. For small-scale petitions, there are only two hearings — one each before the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioners (BCC); one legal ad is placed in the Naples Daily News prior to CCPC hearing, and one prior to BCC hearing. For all other amendment petitions, a total of four public hearings are held — Transmittal hearing before CCPC and BCC, and Adoption hearing before CCPC and BCC. The estimated legal advertising costs will be provided to each petitioner and payment will be required prior to advertising for any hearings; any refund due the petitioner after hearings will be provided at that time. In addition to the petition fee and legal ad costs noted above, payment must also be made for a Traffic Impact Study Review Fee. This fee should be submitted directly to the Transportation Planning Section. Please see their website and/or contact them for more details. There is cost to advertise for and conduct a Neighborhood Information Meeting, and to post a public hearing notice(s) (sign(s)). Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code (LDC) and requires the petitioner of a site -specific GMP amendment to hold a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM); this would occur after a finding of sufficiency of the petition submittal but prior to the first public hearing. The LDC also requires the petitioner of a site -specific GMP amendment to post a notice(s) of the public hearings on the property, for both Transmittal and Adoption hearings. A small-scale amendment is limited to a parcel <50 acres and is limited to a map amendment only and any directly -related text; the map amendment cannot result in a conflict between the map and text — there can be no internal inconsistency in the GMP. Note: Notwithstanding the significant changes made in 2011 (HB7207) to Ch. 163, Florida Statutes, Collier continues to consider demonstration of need and reduction in greenhouse gas in evaluating GMP amendments. Project Description: The applicant proposes a maximum of 40 multifamily units of affordable housing on t 4.17 acres located at the southwest corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 6011, Street South. The subject site is located within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element. The Urban Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map designates the property as Residential Estates Subdistrict. When demonstrating project compliance with the FLUE please address the following policies: Applicable Policies: FLUE Policy 5.6 - "New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code". Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -element 3.2 - Provide for the protection of the rural character of Urban Golden Gate Estates. 3.2.1 — Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low -density residential development. �� 6 May 6, 2025 3.2.3 — Rural character shall be further protected by resisting site -specific master plan changes that are out of scale or character with the rural quality of Urban Golden Gate Estates. 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non -conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Residential density is limited to a maximum of one unit per 2.25 gross acres, or one unit per legal non -conforming lot of record, exclusive of guesthouses. Multiple family dwelling units duplexes and other structures containing two or more principal dwellings, are prohibited in all Districts and Subdistricts in this Designation. Staff Note: The applicant should address how this proposed development will be compatible with the desired rural character stated by the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub -element. The applicant should also explain how the proposed density of approximately 9 DU's/Acre is compatible with the surrounding low density residential development at less thanl DU/Acre. b. Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: 1. Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 175 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard... Staff Note: Per the above policy, Conditional Uses should not be granted on this property. Staff recognizes that this is one of the reasons a GMPA is necessary. The applicant should still explain how multi -family, which is not even listed as a possible Conditional Use in the Estate Zone District, is an appropriate land use for this location. Staffs evaluation and recommendation of this GMPA application will emphasize compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, as well as the need for the proposed use. The following section addresses the specifics of what is necessary regarding compatibility and the specifics of a Needs Analysis. The need for affordable housing is well documented; however the Needs Analysis should address why there is a need in this location (eg. where is the closest affordable housing, number of units within radius X and so on). Generally, staff reviews for, and an applicant should adequately address in the submittal: Appropriateness of uses/compatibility with surrounding area. Impact upon surrounding properties — will it make them less developable under their present FLUM designation? Will it create a domino effect leading to future designation changes on the surrounding properties? Need for the designation change — data and analysis, e.g. Needs Analysis for commercial uses, to demonstrate the change is warranted, that more inventory of the requested uses is needed. Too often, the data only demonstrates the petition site is viable for the proposed uses ("build it & they will come") rather than demonstrate there is a need for a new or expanded GIMP provision to provide for the proposed uses, and that the need is at the subject location. The data should be specific to the proposed land uses, proposed trade service area, persons per household in subject area, etc. as applicable. It is recognized there is more than one acceptable methodology, e.g. radial distance from site (ULI standards for neighborhood/community/regional commercial centers), drive time, etc. Regardless of methodology, the raw data needs to be submitted to allow staff to review it for completeness and accuracy (sometimes parcels are omitted, double counted, included when shouldn't be, etc.). Also, as with all submitted documents, maps of trade service area need to be legible and include adequate identification features, e.g. major roads, Section -Township -Range. Whether there is a specific or general community vision that the amendment addresses, e.g. a redevelopment area. The proposed amendment should correlate to the results of the needs analysis. Too often a need is demonstrated for one set of uses but the amendment is for other uses or goes beyond those uses for which a need is demonstrated (e.g., need is for rental apartments, but amendment allows multifamily uses generally). May 6, 2025 • LOSS (level of service standards) impacts upon public facilities — roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, parks & recreation facilities, etc. • Within the above is consideration of site -specific impacts, e.g. impact upon wetlands and listed species habitats on -site and nearby; and traffic impacts (operational/safety) from the traffic volume generated/attracted and/or the ingress/egress points — turning movements, median openings, traffic signals, etc. Included within this would be a comparison between impacts that would be expected under the existing zoning and/or FLUM designation vs. that which could be expected under the proposed amendment. • Consistency/conformity/harmony with other Goals, Objectives, Policies (GOPs) and provisions in the Element being amended and any other Element of the GMP relevant to the petition, as well as any other applicable regulations (e.g. Manatee Protection Plan, specific LDC provisions). • Furtherance of existing GOPs relevant to the petition. • Furtherance of any other plans or designations that is applicable or relevant to the petition (e.g. a redevelopment plan, Area of Critical State Concern, Rural Area of Opportunity). • Energy efficiency and conservation, reduction of greenhouse gases, reduction of vehicle miles travelled, etc., as [previously] required in HB 697 (2008). • GMP amendment provisions/requirements for a comprehensive plan and plan amendment in Ch. 163.3177(1)(0, and 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. It is important to carefully organize the amendment package; be sure all exhibits are consistently labeled, are in the proper order, and are correctly referenced on the pages of the application. For site -specific amendments, be sure to clearly identify the subject site, include North arrow and scale, and source. A petition narrative is often helpful. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Michael Sawyer Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 2:26 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; Nancy Gundlach; Austin Grubb Subject: Pre-app meeting notes for Gateway Housing GMPA and PUDZ Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Please provide the following notes for Transportation Planning: Transportation Planning: A methodology meeting by email is required and provide a note on the TIS cover sheet that the fee will be collected at the time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide trip limit/cap Commitment based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." The TIS should note that the project is in the East Central TCMA. There are FDOT-scheduled improvements of 1-75 from Golden Gate to Lee County. There is also a current corridor study underway of the Golden Gate from 1-75 to Livingston link. Suggest noting in your narrative/location for the project that the Golden Gate CAT routes connect to six additional/transfer routes. Michael Sawyer Project Manager II Transportation Engineering Office:239-252-2926 Collier County Michael. Sawyer0colliercountyfl.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. ThomasClarkeVEN From: Laurie Beard Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 1:54 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20250006066 (GMPA) & PL20250006068 (PUDZ) - Gateway Housing Subdistrict Attachments: PUD monitoring pre app handout 2024.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged PUD Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager II Development Review Office:239-252-5782 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Bea rd(a)-colliercountyfl.gov J& Collier County ©BOOM Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. '� '14 & _'�' ;z D I I PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring '-One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments.'' Miscellaneous Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. ?"4_ 6." d, 1), 9. Collier County Meeting Notes -Continued /3l-(C l,C. �. f L� I � � S �� �Lt D z a �„l a.,w -e ►�.� i -� e 4 t+17-46-h .e d e-wt llt c. k rv1L i,v s, i -e- . ga_ y ,_, „k,1� i ►v L %ark �c �r � i-(n, �� Ccn. T �i1„� TrK�. — •i: 7-�?eT `rL, ,pSj►o.tiC. STa:t41w:'.-Te 4,— uc c. 4 6,zc,., L_LQN.(A.-G /Vc, L Ts Ar `tits T`/nr.2 5.e�e {. �• � .� i; t;f1-• L'.v Al Ore. i r? � �.�.1:�:1�,1r_. � . ✓ - 77n'lCh•e0 L'-M11-i L jVCt-eS /}-,v6 Ch<'uKLt5� Note 1: If site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (bv email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Department along with a request that then send us a letter or email of "no of jec•tion " to the petition. Bob Middleton RAIiddleton(d nanlesuov.com ,Allvson Holland A:ylHolland(ana)les(,ov.conn. Robin Singer RSinger-ILnaplestrov.c•om, Erica Martin cnnurtin(d nutrles�ot.�ou Note2: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a CertiRcate oj'Occ•upancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GAIP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public• facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review,fees. Please note that impact fees and tares collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to anah•ze this petition. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Growth Management Communitv Development • Planning to Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe DriNe • Naples, FL 3410E • 239 252 2400 • tetttt.collicrcnunt�tL�u� Page 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Claudia Carmenate Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2025 4:19 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Utilities Website htt s: www.colliercount fl. ov overnment ublic-utilities water -sewer -district en ineerin -and- roiect- management/resources Claudia Carmenate Project Manager I Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Office:239-252-1335 3339 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 Claudia. Carmenate(c)colliercountyfl gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:18 PM To: Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Utilities Website Hi Claudia, J& Collier Count Could you send me that link to that Utilities website and the form you mention during the Zoning Pre-App meetings so when you mention it in the Zoom meeting I can send it to the applicant if applicable. Thank You, Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Thomas Clarke Operations Analyst Development Review Office:239-252-2526 .r s • A ! f Lj N 'v 3J ThomasClarkeVEN From: Cormac Giblin Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 11:37 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) None from me. Cormac Giblin AICP, CPM Division Director - Economic Development & Housing Economic Development & Housing Office:239-252-2460 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Cormac.Giblin(c)colliercountyfl.gov it Collier County 008com From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 11:31 AM To: Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov>; Cormac Giblin <Cormac.Giblin@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Nancy Gundlach <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) Hello everyone, Can you let me know if you have any Zoning Pre-App Notes for the above. The Zoom meeting was held on Wednesday 6/4/25. 1 have attached the Research to refresh your memory. Thanks 7l pia Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 1 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Craig Brown Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 11:19 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) Attachments: Environmental data Checklist LAND USE Project Bayshore..doc If the request will be a PUD Please provide the following: 1. Please provide Environmental Data: Please provide FLUCFCS aerial map of the subject property please include the invasive exotic plant percentage amounts and indicate which FLUCFCS are being considered Native Vegetation. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3,05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 2. Please provide a current Listed species survey, which should include listed plants for the subject property. Provide supporting exhibits (i.e. Panther zones ect.) be sure to include Black Bear and Florida Bonneted Bat as part of the evaluation. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 3. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). (10% present preservation required.) Label the Master plan with a note showing preservation calculation in the packet submitted or indicate the preservation will be met off -site. 4. Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1 and Objective 7.1. Please address this for both the GMPA and PUD. 5. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation requirements and minimizes impacts to listed species as required in the CCME. (The preservation Requirement is 10%). 6. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (If found onsite). 7. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. Check the boxes for FLUCFCS Map and Environmental Data. FEE $2500.00 Craig Brown Manager - Environmental Services Development Review Office-.239-252-2548 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Craig. Brown@colliercountyfLgov i It Collier County 0080M From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 11:31 AM To: Austin Grubb <Austin.Grubb @colliercountyfl.gov>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brown @col lie rcountyfl.gov>; Claudia Carmenate <Claudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov>; Cormac Giblin <Cormac.Giblin@colliercountyfl.gov>; Jocelyn NageondeLestang <J.NageondeLestang@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Nancy Gundlach <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Zoning Pre-App Notes for Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 & PL20250006066 (GMPA) Hello everyone, Can you let me know if you have any Zoning Pre-App Notes for the above. The Zoom meeting was held on Wednesday 6/4/25. 1 have attached the Research to refresh your memory. Thanks Operations Analyst - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2526 Thomas Clarke Operations Analyst Development Review Office:239-252-2526 Thomas, ClarkeC�colliercountyfl.gov it Collier County 0080M Under Florida Law e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead contact this office by telephone or in writing ,6y C' � Environmental Data Checklist The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EiS fee if PUD WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT'? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves. show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 5. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and. where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SUP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide when treated stormwater is being directed into preserves (95 above). Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey tirne may be required if listed species are discovered Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 8. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Note: Not required at time of Land use petitions except for Bald Eagle Management Plans. Staff requests ;4 6 management plans for other species are only provided at time of Plat or SDP. 9. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. a. Provide descriptions of each FLUCFCS code Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. a. Demonstrate on map. b. Provide a companion chart. 10. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 1 1. submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 12. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 13. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 14. 1s EAC Review (by CCPC) required? 15. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes (note requirements subject to change during revie%N process) Type B or C Landscape Buffer (provide as Buffer commitment): Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to provide the required (insert Type B or C) buffer, a minimum 6-foot-wide landscape buffer easement located outside of the preserve will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association or condominium association at time of SDP or plat approval. Owner will plant additional landscape material in the buffer easement to achieve the opacity requirement no later than one year from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. _�.t ( , 0 � C, �, Collier County Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20250006068 (PUDZ) & 20250006066(GMPA) Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email Mike Bosi Division Director-Planning&Zoning 252-1061 Michael.Bosi@colliercountyfl.gov Ray Bellows Manager — Planning & Zoning 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov _ Richard Henderlong Zoning -Planner III 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov Laura Delohn Zoning - Vendor 2S2-S587 Laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov i John Kelly Zoning -Planner III 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov .✓ Nancy Gundlach, AICP Zoning —Planner III 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov Eric Ortman Zoning — Planner III 252-1032 Eric.Ortman@colliercountyfl.gov _I Sean Sammon Zoning— Planner III 252-8422 Sean.sammon@colliercountyfl.gov l ! Maria Estrada Zoning Planner II 252-2408 Maria Estrads@colliercountyfl.gov _! Tim Finn, AICP Zoning - Planner III 252-4312 timothy.finn @col liercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Zoning - Operations Analyst 252-2526 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov Anthony Stoltz Utility Planning - Supervisor 252-5835 Anthony.stoltz@colliercountyfl.gov Drew Cody Utility Planning — Project Mgr. III 252-2917 Drew. cody@colliercountyfLgov Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brand i.pollard @colIiercountyfLgov Claudia LAn '��g ti iJt�lrty Planning —Project Mgr. I 252-2917 frevo.-GecLjc@colliercountyf4.gov Shon Fandrich Utilities -Project Mgt -Supervisor 252-8835 Shon.fandrich@colliercountyfl.gov Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Michael Gibbons Structural/Resident Plan Review 252-2426 michael. gibbons @coIIiercountyfLgov Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov 1� Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring -Project Mgr. II 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Sean Lintz Battalion Chief - N. Collier Fire 597-9227 slintz@northcollierfire.com Bryan Horbal Captain — N. Collier Fire 552-1367 Bryan.horbal@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel Turner Plan Examiner - N. Collier Fire 252-2521 Daniel.turner@colliercountyfl.gov Linda Naples Sr. Plan Examiner —N. Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.naples@colliercountyfl.gov Shar A. Beddow Dep. Fire Marshal - Gr Naples Fire 241-1422 sbeddow@gnfire.org Thomas Mastroberto Gr. Naples Fire Site Plans Rev. III 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov James Sabo, AICP GMP, Comp Planning Manager 252-2708 james.sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Parker Klopf GMP—Comp Planning — Planner III 252-2471 Parker.klopf@colliercountyfl.gov Jessica Malloy GMP-Comp Planning -Planner II 252-4329 Jessica.malloy@colliercountyfl.gov Stephenne Barter GMP—Comp Planning — Planner II 252-7707 Stephenne.barter@colliercountyfl.gov Austin Grubb GMP—Comp Planning — Planner III 252-2834 Austin.Grubb@colliercountyfl.gov Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 4 of 5 GroN%di Mana9cmcnt Community Development • Planning & Zoning, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naplei, FL 34104 • 239.252-2400 • wvcw.<ollirrcuunt111�^w // Collier Counter Michele Mosca,AICP Community Development Planner III 252-2834 Michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Review -Mgr. 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist 252-2907 Alexandra.Mitchel@colliercountyfl.gov David Roe Environmental Specialist 252-2915 David. Roe@col IiercountyfLgov Lauren Murray Environmental Specialist 252-2306 Lauren.murray@colliercountyfl.gov John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision Vend. 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov Jocelyn Nageon De Lestang, P.E. Engineering - Stormwater 252-2434 Jocelyn.NaeeondeLestanQ@colliercountyfl•eov Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Division Director - IF, CPP & PM 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Cormac Giblin, AICP Division Director — Economic. Dev. & Housing 252-2460 Cormac.giblin@colliercountyfl.gov Sarah Harrington Manager — Planning 252-4211 Sarah.harrington@colliercountyfl.gov Jamie Cook Division Director- Development Review 252-6290 Jai me.cook@colliercountyfLgov _ Lisa Blacklidge Development Review Manager- Planning 252-27S8 Lisa.blacklidge@colliercountyfl.gov Christine Willoughby Planner III 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov Brett Rosenblum-P.E. Development Review— Supervisor Project Mgr. 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review — Planner III 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov Gino Santabarbara Impact Fees — Planner III 252-2925 Gino.santabarbara@colliercountyfl.gov Diane Lynch Management Analyst 1 252-4283 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov _. Renald Paul Program Coordinator 252-2443 Rena ld.pauI@colliercountyfLgov Connie Thomas Client Services -Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov �r✓ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Derek Perry Assistant County Attorney 252-8066 Derek. perry@colliercountyfLgov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Sq,LL •M��s d AL.q GNU. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 3/10/2025 Page 5 of 5 Gro%%th Management Community lieeclopment • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe DI.ke • Naples, FL 3410L • 239 252 2400 • %st+w.coilirreountetl.�o) Pre-App Zoom Attendance: Meeting Date: Wednesday 6/4/24 at 1:30 ZOOM Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 _-Planner: Nancy Gundtach Gatewav Housin Subdistric�GMPA1-_PL20250006066 Planner: Austin Grubb i thomas clarke (Host, nee) ® Ellen Summers O 40s l� Michael Puchalla :9. O P Participants (19) — 0 X C F- ui a part:, �pa.L © NancyGundlach Michael Puchalla A Cr1 f Q Robert Mulhere Cry © sawyermichael Q. C� Oashton_h Aurora Wells, Trie Housing Alliance, Inc., CFO Austin Grubb C70 0 Beard-1 oClaud iaCarmenate f- Cormac Giblin 0 Matt Smithz C� ® Michele Mosca Z Patrice Marcuson Minogue 0 Patrick Korth Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager Zach Lombardo Collier Cor�trity Growth Management Community Development Dept. ZONING STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING COMPANION ITEMS Project Gateway PUD (PUDZ) - PL20250006068 Planner: Nancy Gundlach Gateway Housing Subdistrict (GMPA) - PL20250006066 Planner: Austin Grubb • Applicant Submitting Request: Stephanie Karol — Hole Montes, Inc. 239-254-2018 stephaniekarol@hmeng.com • Agent to list for PL# Ellen Summers, AICP — Senior Manager — Bowman 239-254-2016 esummers@bowman.com • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Anna R. Mongillo Parcel # 38164120005 • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: PUD Rezone (PUDZ) Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): 40 Townhome Units • Details about Project: PUD Rezone from the E-Estates zoning district to the Project Gateway PUD to permit a maximum of 40 townhome units, as part of an affordable housing, build to rent to own, project, with a Companion Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment to create the Gateway Housing Subdistrict to permit a maximum of 40 townhome units, as part of an affordable housing, build to rent to own, project. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor — Permitting Consuela.thomas@colliercountyfl.gov - Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY PROPERTY ;o 0 62ND ST. SW BOUNDARY 25- 4. 9w LL f"'4 rk t -7 -4 - —A I - ism" 4 w Call D'fom y- 199 i i . POSSIBLE TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION PROPERTY [BOUNDARY 10 0 0' 'XI"— ROW NOTE, LINE WORK OBTAINED FROM --CbUJEj(COIJNW PROPERTY 06 6P1ENWAGECA41UCULA"nTI ENALCING 23.0% PAV9004T M24 we%7 CLIFUSHIEVVILK 0,12 Z9% DRYDETENnCN .......................... SLIOWTAL 1.89 ... 401 S, .................. . ...........................-- ............... nITALffM 14.17 1 LL rx LL rx Lu 0 z -0 > z U) W W 0 NE u, 0 ED) w LL 0 LL CLOD LU _j :D U) DO PR (104JNIT� mo No Sol UN 4:. Alai P-01 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ® PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary j Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form I� Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures — Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with p oje t bV6n ary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ® ❑ Statement of utility provisions X Li Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan (� Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ® ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Q9 Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDQWith justificati for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8' ' x 11" copy ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4122/24 Page 9 of 11 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined El 10 Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Ne Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments !f located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3S00 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anther*j_Ste#s ('Cp k p,.y C'a,ti,hi , 2 Parks and Recreation Director: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: C Stormwater Management: SK �t,� , C �s7", c Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin Other: Au City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Q9 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Z PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Sr Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,S00.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 Page 180 of 745 X Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) X Estimated Legal Advertising fee: CCPC: $1,125.00 BCC: $500.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountZI.gov k ,a Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date Printed Named of Signing Party PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Page 182 of 745 Collier County GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HOUSING POLICY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Name of Development: Project Gateway Address/Location: Parcel38164120005 Applicant /Agent: Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr Manager -Bowman Phone / Email: esummers@bowman.com Size of Property. 4.1e Acres Proposed Use: Residential Multi -Family Total Number Residential Units Planned: 36 Permit Number, if available: PL20250006068 (PUDz) Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: Rental Owner Occupied 121 % - 140% AMI - GAP Income Rental Owner Occupied " 81 % - 120% AMI - Moderate Income Rental Owner Occupied 19 51 % - 80% AMI - Low Income Rental Owner Occupied 50% or less AMI - Very Low Income Rental Owner Occupied 30% or less AMI - Extremely Low Income Proposed Land Use Restrictions x - PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement - Developer Agreement - Impact Fee Deferral Agreement - Grant Restriction - Other: I hereby certify that the above -described project meets the definition of providing affordable Housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in the Collier County Administrative Code through Resolution No. 2018- 40. LO-A IIn Digitally signed by Ellen Summers, AICP Ellen Summers, AICP ON: C=US. E=esu lien Summers. A.com, Bowman, OU=Bowman SW Florida, Mu Summers, AICP" Date: 2025 08.26 t t:01:36-04.00, Date: 08/28/2025 Applicant/ Builder/ Developer Housing Policy & Economic Development Division Authorized Signer Date: This Certification must be submitted to the Growth Management Community Development Department with permit application package, or plan revisions, within nine months of date of issuance. Updated: 6/6/2024 SH Housing Policy & Economic Development • 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 Page 183 of 745 Co we-r County Public Services Department Community & Human Services Division CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED REVIEW Name of Development: Project Galeway Applicant/Agent: Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr Manager Bowman Email: esummers@bowman.com Size of Property: 4.18acres Proposed Use: Mun'-Family (36 Affordable D.Us1 Total Number of Residential Units Planned: 36 Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: 36 # Rental # Owner Current % of Affordable Units: 1000 Address/Location: Parcel. 38164120005 Phone: 239-254-2016 Area Median Income (AMI) Target 120%-140% GAP Income 80% - 120% Moderate Income 50% - 80% Low Income 30% - 50% Very -Low Income 0% - 30% Extremely -Low Income Threshold to qualify: 20% Permit Number, if available: PUDZPL20250006068and SSGMPAPL20250006066 Proposed Land Use Restriction PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement ® Developer Agreement ® Impact Fee Deferral Agreement ® Grant Restriction ® Other: I hereby certify that the above -described project meets the definition of providing affordable housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in Resolution No. 2018-40. Digitally signed by GiblinCormac Daen202508.01 11:08:58 By:-04*00' Date: 8r1; 2025 Community & Human Services Division By: Digit* signed by Ellen Summers, AICP ON. C-US, E-esummers@bowman. Ellen Summers, AICP O=eowma^.od=eowman SW Flonda. CN= Ellen Summers. AICP' Date: 4025.08 01 09:47,37 04'00' Date: &12025 Builder/ Owner/ Developer/ Contractor *Signed as Agent This Certification must be submitted to the Growth Management Department with your permit application package, or plan revisions, within nine months of date of issuance. Community & Human Services Division - 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 211 - Naples, Florida 34112-5361 239-252-CARE (2273) - 239-252-CAFE (2233) • 239-252-4230 (RSVP) - www colliergov net/humanservices Page 184 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) EMAIL FROM RAY BELLOWS RE HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Page 185 of 745 Stephanie Karol From: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 3:43 PM To: Ellen Summers Cc: Stephanie Karol Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Historical and Archaeological Survey Requirement Hi Ellen, Based upon my review of the official Archaeological Probability Maps, the subject property doesn't contain any known archaeological site nor is it within a "Probability Area". As a result, there is no requirement for an Historical and Archaeological Survey or waiver to be submitted with the below referenced PUD rezone application. Furthermore, I have determined that this archaeological survey requirement was inadvertently checked off on the Pre -Application meeting notes. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please don't hesitate to ask. Respectfully, Ray Bellows Manager - Planning Zoning Office:239-252-2463 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Ra .BellowstcDcolliercountyfl.gov From: Ellen Summers <esummers@bowman.com> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 10:42 AM To: Ray Bellows <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Stephanie Karol <skarol@bowman.com> Subject: Historical and Archaeological Survey Requirement -C Collier Coun GE001 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning Ray, As a follow-up to our phone conversation today: I would like to confirm that the PUDZ (PL20250006068) does not require a Historical and Archaeological Survey based on the location of the project, and that this was inadvertently checked off on the Pre -Application meeting notes. Thank you! Page 186 of 745 ELLEN SUMMERS, AICP Senior Manager, Planning and Development I BOWMAN 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 0: (239) 254-2000 1 D: (239) 254-2016 1 C: (239) 287-0066 esummers@bowman.com I bowman.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 187 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) PUDZ APPLICATION Page 188 of 745 Need Help? C0116 County GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide Growth Management E-Permitting Guides Community Development Department Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) ✓ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsections 10.02.13 E; and 10.03.06.13; and Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. File a separate application for an insubstantial or minor change to a PUD. Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Anna R. Mongillo Name of Applicant if different than owner: Collier County Community Land Trust /Michael Puchalla, Exec. Dir. Address: 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 109 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34105 Telephone: 239-434-2397 Cell: N/A E-Mail Address: michael@collierhousing.com Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Sr. VP & Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr. Manager, Planning & Development* Firm: Bowman Consulting Group Address: 950 Encore Way, Suite 200 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Telephone: 239-254-2000 Cell: N/A E-Mail Address: RMulhere@bowman.com & ESummers@bowman.com * Zach Lombardo, Esq.,Wocdward Pires & Lombardo,PA, Attorneys at Law 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 20C, Naples, FL 34103; email: zlombardo@wpl-legal.com If Property is under contract to be sold. Name of Property Buyer(s): Collier County Community Land Trust Michael Puchalla, Executive Director Name of Applicant if different than buyer: Address: 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 109 Telephone. 239-434-2397 E-Mail Address: michael@collierhousing.com Name of Agent: Same as above Firm: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: City: City: Naples Cell: N/A Cell: State: FL ZIP: 34105 State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 1 of 11 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.colliercountvf.gov Page 189 of 745 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: E-Estates (portion within CMO) Zoning district(s) to the PUD Zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No: N/A Multi -Family Residential (36 D/U) PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • If required to do so at the pre -application meeting, the applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six (6) months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: 29 / 49S / 26E Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates, Unit 30 Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: — Size of Property: ft. x See Survey Property ID Number: 38164120005 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 4.18± Address/General Location of Subject Property: South of Golden Gate Parkway and east of 1-75, at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th Street SW. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial 0 Residential ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Industrial ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Research and Technology Park ❑ Airport Operations ❑ Other: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 2 of 11 Page 190 of 745 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Golden Gate Parkway, E - Estates with CU GG Parkway, Healthcare Services, Church S E - Estates Single Family Residential E 60th Street SW ROW, E-Estates with CU ROW, Church W E - Estates Single Family Residiential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: -J-f Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property ID Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner/ Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: East Naples Civic & Commerce Mailing Address: 8595 Collier Blvd., Suite 107-49 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34114 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State —ZIP: City: State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 3 of 11 Page 191 of 745 SEE ATTACHED EVALUATION CRITERIA EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy, or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy, or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 4 of 11 Page 192 of 745 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes Z No If yes, please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.05. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment, or change, for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing, and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees, and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 5 of 11 Page 193 of 745 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Collier County Community Land Trust - Michael Puchalla, Executive Director Address: 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 109 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34105 Telephone :239-434-2397 Cell: NIA E-Mail Address: michael@collierhousing.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34116 I PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 29 49S / 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Golden Gate Estates, Unit 30 Metes & Bounds Description: See Survey Plat Book: Page #: Check applicable system: Property ID Number: 36164120005 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Package Treatment Plant e. Septic System Check applicable system: Provide Name: (GPD Capacity): Type: TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System X b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: 90 (36 d/u's) (accessory recreational uses included in PUD, however not anticipated to be developed) Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 16,380 gpd B. Sewer -Peak: 1669pm Average Daily Demands: 12,600 gpd Average Daily Demands: 9,000 gpd PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 6 of 11 Page 194 of 745 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Attach additional pages if necessary. N/A Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. 1►U_1 Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 7 of 11 Page 195 of 745 COVENANT OF CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as PARCEL ID NO. 38164120005 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for PUD planned unit development ( FtPUD) zoning. We hereby designate c0u-"c00TY-mT4uv' legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. MICHAEL PUCH&LLA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of t tnned unit development. Signature o Owner QSSignature of Owner ANNA R. MONGILLO Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COWER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me a by means of M physical presence or online notarization 57 this �/day of, 20 by �Tn� q„q� %�o who is❑personally known to me or Fx1 has producedas identification. - - Signature of Notary Public Print Name PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, Public 'urw I"- DMUNVU Notary Public, State of Connecticut My Commission E>Egires Qctjj, 2025 Page 196 of 745 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL OF TRACT 49, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3210, PAGE 750, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Page 197 of 745 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: 0 PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary L11 Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes (� Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownershio Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures X Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑X ❑ Statement of utility provisions Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 XEl Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ❑X ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. Q ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses A Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ Z List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) 0 ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 9 of 11 Page 198 of 745 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑X Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Q Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification X -The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 GA of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3S00 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson X Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin X Other: Cormac Giblin ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Q Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $7S0.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 Page 199 of 745 ® Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) ® Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: $500.00 ® If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices(@colliercountvfl.eov —01 �UAAAA,- Signature of Petitioner or Agent Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr. Mgr, Planning & Development Printed Named of Signing Party 1-13-2026 Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 Page 200 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) AERIAL LOCATION MAP Page 201 of 745 yam. • � � _ ! .. �. Chrsi_,' 'jjLG G0la( Gn a Pkwy r . Golden ate PKwy Golc 62nd St SV11 ` - '� � •1. J. Primera I�gl�sia crisiiMla Mananiial^De rah ►— L Y ,oa . !.'ty _ tf PYr GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Page 203 of 745 GMCD Public Portal Collier County Land Development Code Administrative Code Addressing Checklist Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a x are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Applicant Contact Information `Name of Owner/Agent: Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning & Development Firm [if agent]: Bowman -Address: 950 Encore Way, Ste. 200 'Telephone: (239) 254-2000 'City: Naples Cell: #E-Mail Address: ESummers@bowman.com Location Information "State: FL ZIP:34110 Fax: "Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: 38164120005 Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: Section 29, Township 49S, Range 26E, Golden Gate Estates Unit 30 Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-2S2-2400 • x,xw.colhercountvll.aov/ Page 204 of 745 Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressino(a-)colliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: Proposed Project Name: Project Gateway RPUD Proposed Street Name: Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] Submittal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. ❑ E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.col I iercou ntvfl.ciov/citvviewweb Questions? Email: Front. Deskia' )colliercountyfl.gov Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • www.colliercoun4G,g23 / Page 205 of 745 .- Ati►'-�� � -��Y�n—ram _, a`^ _. I , �'� <"s, a4q� ;t'�ij`�?�� Y' It Y � � ,ICI • - �� �� �" "'� I �� ��;, �'.' ` .� .. Jew. too LLLL> ,.• r .. � � �' . #� � • �''�;+ � ^ • , _ !�-;_, _tea--'`11k. _w.+.r rjw J•••=14R .uS'--—.���',// +S �S� `N/ GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) AFFIDAVITS OF AUTHORIZATION Page 207 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL202500W068bPL.20250006068 I, MICHAELPOCMALLA (print name), as E%ECUTIVEDIRECTOR (title, if applicable) of COLLIER COUNIT, COMMLWTV LAND TRUST (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaserMand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize ROBERT MULMERE FAICP SR VP ELLEN SUMMERS AICP SR MANAGER ZACHLOMBARDO ESC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v, pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 1'� u,�GL_ Signature Date MICHAEL PUCHALLA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COLLIER COUNTY COMM LAND TRUST STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or day of 20�, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: CM08-COA-00115\155 RE%' 3/J/2020 ❑online notarization this INDA B " �OZp,RY Poi lid;: MY COMMISSION 's EXPIRES 1-26-2029 01 S''9TFOF FLOO��P�'L��~ s•�NMIMBER�''.�6 Page 208 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PROJECTGAmwAYPL-20250mw%&PL-,o25mowo 1, ANNA R MONGILLO (print name), as 0— (title, if applicable) of PAR—ID_3,641-w5 (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner=✓ applicantQcontract purchaserF9and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize-wFRCOUNTVCOMMUNfTY LANE) TRUST- MICNAELPUCKkL EMCUTNEDIRECTOR to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicants status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. A ' -,A � Signatur Date ANNA R_ MONGILLO STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ftphysical presence or ® online notarization this day o 2QOLS by (printed name of owner or qualifier) j/p Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑ Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license/>?-"'/ -osb Has produced as identification. Notary Signature-(:; ' . SANDRA A. BRUNOLI — ` Notary Public, State of Connecticut CP108-COA-001151155 My commission Expires Oct 31, 2025 . . REV 3/4/2020 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST, INC. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM, CCCLT EQUITABLE INTEREST CONFIRMATION & CORPORATE RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION Page 210 of 745 Cofer County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the oT sucn interest: I Name and Address I % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage oT stocK ownea DV eacn: I Name and Address I % of Ownership I C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the iercentage oT interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 01/2023 Page 1 of 3 Page 211 of 745 Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the eneldl d11U/UI IIIIIIICU I.ld1UlC1�,: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the c` i1111.C1 J, Z, LUt- I IVIUCI J, VCI ICI I L I d I ICZ), VI F.JdI 111C1 J. Name and Address % of Ownership Collier County Community Land Trust 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 109, Naples, FL 34105 Date of Contract: 3/26/25 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of g. Date subject property acquired , or trust: Name and Address ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Page 212 of 745 • Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Agent/Owner Signature Michael Puchalla, Executive Director Agent/Owner Name (please print) Collier County Community Land Trust 08/01 /2025 Date 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 213 of 745 Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc. 3200 Bailey Ln., Ste 109 Naples, FL 34105 (239) 434-2397 michael@collierhousing.com Date: 09/29/2025 To Whom It May Concern: This letter serves to confirm that Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc. (CCCLT) is a nonprofit organization duly organized and operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit entity, CCCLT is governed by a Board of Directors and operates exclusively for charitable purposes. In accordance with federal tax law and the organization's governing documents, no individual, entity, or affiliated party holds or may derive any equitable interest in the assets, income, or operations of CCCLT. All assets and income are used solely to further the organization's exempt purposes, including the development and stewardship of affordable housing in Collier County. Should CCCLT be dissolved, its assets will be distributed in accordance with IRS regulations and applicable state law to another qualifying 501(c)(3) organization with similar charitable purposes. If you require additional documentation or have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Michael Puchalla Executive Director Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc. Page 214 of 745 CORPORATE RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION The undersigned, Secretary of Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc. a Florida not -for - profit corporation ("Corporation"), does hereby certifies the following: 1. The Corporation is duly formed, validly existing company in good standing under the laws of the State of Florida. 2. The following resolutions were unanimously adopted, and the same have not been revoked, cancelled, annulled or amended in any manner and are in full force and in effect on the date hereof. 3. The following Resolutions were adopted by the Corporation at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation held on August 16 , 2024.: RESOLVED THAT: The Corporation is to acquire property(ies) for affordable housing development. WHEREAS in this action, the Corporation has declared its intent to conduct activities to purchase/foster housing opportunities for the residents of Collier County, Florida. FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: the Executive Director of the Corporation ("Authority") is hereby authorized and empowered to purchase, sell, transfer, convey, mortgage/encumber real and personal property(ies) on behalf of the Corporation. FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: all purchase/sales contract(s), agreement(s), mortgage(s), closing document(s), and all instrument(s) necessary for the purpose of acquiring or selling property(ies) for the Corporation shall be executed by the Executive Director and President of the Board or a properly authorized designee. FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: in addition to and without limiting the foregoing, that the Authority of the Corporation be, and hereby is, authorized to take, or cause to be taken, such further action, and to execute and deliver, or cause to be delivered, for and in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, all such instruments and documents as the Authority may deem appropriate in order to effectuate a real estate purchase or sale and any documents or instruments executed in the accomplishment of any action or actions authorized as stated herein shall be deemed to be conclusive approval thereof by this Corporation and the binding act and obligation of this Corporation. DATED: September Jam, 2024 Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation Page 1 of 2 Corporate Resolutions Z �" -L By: ' i Loo r, Secretary Page 215 of 745 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to, subscribed and acknowledged before me by means of ( %4 physical presence or ( ) online notarization, this l b day of September, 2024, by Keri Looker, Secretary of Collier County Community Land Trust, Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation for and on behalf of the Corporation who 7- is/are personall} known to me or who _ has/have produced _ _ _ as identification. (seal) ki k �M Notary Publi - Print Name: r ({-e r Iv HAVEN CHERIE SMERLUND My Commission Expires: l ( Z 5 i� Notary Public• State of Florida Commission N HH 076791 ?urn!? My Comm. Expires Apr 14, 2025 Baided through National Notary Assn. Page 2 of 2 Corporatc Resolutions Page 216 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) ANNA R. MONGILLO PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM, OWNER AFFIDAVIT, ORDER OF TAKING & FINAL JUDGMENT FOR PARCEL 143 Page 217 of 745 Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 ) Email: GMDClientServices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the ra 2 eiuenidr,e ui �,uc.n inLUFUNL. Name and Address % of Ownership ANNA R. MONGILLO 100% 103 BEECHWOOD DRIVE, SOUTHINGTON, CT 06489 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ere.enLdr,e ui swurc uwneu uy edurl: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: 01/2023 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Page 218 of 745 0 e IF g GAr County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClientservices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the G enerdi dnu/ul nrnlLeu Ndruler5: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the C I1I ILt.1 D, JLVL.RI IV IU Cl J, V CI ICI II.IdI ICJ, VI f/dI LI ICI D. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired 02/01 /1990 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: 01/2023 Page 2 of 3 Page 219 of 745 I Co er County Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239) 252-1036 1 Email: GMDClient5ervices@colliercountyfl.gov www.colliercountyfl.gov Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. / understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: h"ps://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov (1h �JwAm�� 8115 gent/Owner Signature Date Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager Agent/Owner Name (please print) 01/2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 220 of 745 INSTR 4450279 OR 4584 PG 5 RECORDED 7/7/2010 3:08 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT REC S27.00 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER On this day b fore me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take ackno�leoments and administer oaths, personally appeared ANNA R. MONGILLO, �, after being by me first duly cautioned and sworn, upon her oath deposes and sfys:� 1. I, ANNA R. MiON' GILLO, am the owner of real property located in Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as: Parcel91: All of Tract, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit 30, according to the pl t thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, of the Public Record!rof Follier County, Florida, less and except that certain right-qf--way more particularly described in that certain Order of Taking dated January 31, 2003, as recorded in O.R. Book 3210,*tage 0750, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; arA Parcel #2: All right, title and interXein and to the following described property: f 1. That certain Cooperative Ownecg'Agreement dated October 16, 1970, between the Del Mar Oub; Inc., a non-profit Florida corporation, and Donald M. Norfing and Patricia S. Norling, husband and wife; 2. The property described in said Agreement, `to -wit: Apartment 400, Del Mar Club, Naples, Florida; 1 3. Any prepaid operating assessments previously 711 to Del Mar Club, Inc. 1.11 2. My husband, DOMINICK J. MONGILLO, and I acquired title the subject properties by those certain instruments recorded in O.R. Book 1502, Page 746-and O.R. Book 1143, Page 2214, respectively, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 3. My husband and I were lawfully marred to each other prior to acquiring title to the subject properties and we remained married to each other, without intervening divorce, until the death of my husband, DOMINICK J. MONGILLO. 4. My husband, DOMINICK J. MONGILLO, died on 4th day of February, 2002 in the Town of Southington, County of Hartford, and State of Connecticut. A certified Page 221 of 745 OR 4584 PG 6 copy of his Death Certificate is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A•" FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. Dated: 0/0 0 fi r ANNA R. MONGILLO SWORN O and si bscr bed before me this 6th day of July, 2010. �. "�+raPA Benjamin T: pson Commissicm # Dia12725 A'• Expires Novemt�r 14, 2010 ,;t;(t•` 0a,,,,�„q „�,,,,,4 eeaiesZo,e NOtommis PU C se 1) My ' n Expi s: Personally known or Prod"uceyd-Iden ti5cation Type of Identification Produced SE '•` d 1 f F � r Page 222 of 745 0 0 ORIGINAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20' JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, Case No. 02-3925CA Parcel No. 143 Vs. ANNA MONGI.I�'O, ET Al, 0 Defendants.,/ Flied in F / Date: 1 .G 8Y ORDER OF TAKING FOR PARCEL 143 a THIS CAUSE coming to be heard by the Court, it appearing that proper notice was a / o ~- first given to all the Defendants, &;Cd to all persons having or claiming any equity, lien, title, or o other interest in or to the real property desciibed in the Petition, that the Petitioner would apply ad to this Court for an Order of Taking ofPareA143 and the Court being fully advised in the owl premises, upon consideration, it is, therefore, a ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: o ' f� co - 1. That the Court has jurisdiction of th6"wbject matter of and the parties to this Mcause. v m 2. That the pleadings in this cause are sufficienit. 3. That the Petitioner is properly exercising its delegattd aathdtity. 4. That the property is being acquired for a public purpose.- f 5. That the taking of this property is reasonably necessary to serve the public i purpose for which the property is being acquired. 6. That the Estimate of Value filed in this cause by the Petitioner was made in good faith and based upon a valid appraisal. The Defendant, does not waive or compromise any of its Page 223 of 745 • 10 OR: 3210 PG: 0751 rights or claims for all compensation as provided in Section 73.071, Florida Statutes, including, but not limited to, business damages and severance damages, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. That upon the payment of the deposit hereinafter specified into the Registry of this Court, the right, title or interest specified in the Petition as described herein shall vest in the Petitioner. 8. That the deposit of money will secure the persons lawfully entitled to the compensation which will bt utfimately determined by final judgment of this Court. 9. That the sum -of n�ney to be deposited in the registry of this Court within twenty (20) days of the entry of this 6rdeahall be in the amount of SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND 1 I . AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($74,000.00) for,Parcel 143. 10. That upon proper notit ee . nd ,hearing, pursuant to Section 74.071, Florida Statutes, the deposit may be distributed to tndants in accordance with the Court's order j .. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers dds� day of 2003, A.D., in Naples, the State of Florida, County of Collier. O l ,J Hu y fit Judge Copies to.. 3 o,3 % Charles W. Sevastos, Esquire I Brian P. Patchen, Esquire (Petitioner will provide conformed copies to all other Defendants on the attached Service List) / 4C Page 224 of 745 0 0 OR: 3210 PG: 0752 F.P. NO. 2007321 Try rnuNTY SECTION 03175-243 STAT& nv ' - PARCEL 143 � - FEE SIIdPI+E 1,sE`STATE OR INTEREST TO BE OBTAINED: a That port�ionof Tract 49, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. EastQ+as A) Township 49 South, Rangepublic Records subdivision iWSection 29, page 58, per plat thereof.�reco ridain Plat Book 7, of Collier Coudty, Being described as`"follows: ,� en Gate Parkway (C•R• 886); IN at the north rest corner °�oldid Tract 49, said corner8be being BEG base lime f the North 89 OS 0 on the survey F extension of the thence along the north.alirte of to said Tract 49+ (per plat East a distance of 299•86.f eesementhofn60THgstreet S.W. (P west existing right of wayd rds of Collier County, Florida);t Book 7, page 56, public RCS right of way easement and the thence along said west exi tii�g northerly extension thereo� so �► 00°55'20" East a distance of nort Y o�i0$1, West a distance of 299.86 feet 75.00 feet; thence South 89r thence along said west line to the west line of said Tract,. 49 i North 00°55'17" West a distanc�.bf 75.00 feet to the POINT O . BEGINNING. Containing 22,489 square feet. ingress, light, air and view Together with all rights of egress+ facility grantor's remaining propsr�i and any between the arty. constructed on the above described property. ALSO � a of Tract 49, Golden Gate Es�j eangei26NBast��as B) That portion Township.49 So subdivision in Section 29, p egg, public Records per plat thereof recorded in plat Book 7, �J_�f of Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: 6� GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF v4A�WyE Page 225 of 745 F.Y. N0. 2007321 • 3175-2430 STATE ROAD 93 li OR: 3210 PG: 0753 - YARCEL 143 CONT'D said corner e line of the Golden Gate Parkway (C.R• Commence at the northwest corner of said Tract 49f South . being on the survey base thence along the west line of said Tract 886) ; �� t a distance t 75.00 f Cetofo135.801IfeetFt BEGINNING; 00°55'17 East ° ,08 East a and having a radius of thence North 89 05 distance beginnipg1�f a curve concave southwester y • thence along the arc of traldangleeofo44h59r57"twith 105.00 feet; h a cen distance of-gZ.47 feet through „ East to the end of said curve; a chord bearir)g south 68 24 53 of 73.63 feet to the ° 11 East a distance and having a radius of thence South'f45 54 54 beginning of,�''�curve concave northeasterlcurve to the y • thence along the arc central angle of 45°OOe00"ft awith 45.00 feet, eL� through a the end of said curve, distance of in0-1h 68024'5411 East to 5.93 feet to the west a chord bearing° a�ttt06" East a distance of (per plat Book thence North 89 asement o 60TH Street S.W. ida); thence existing right of w 00055'20" e 58, �Rec rds of Collier 'county• 7� pas public 9 right of way easement South�� along said west existing eet; thence SO concave �ve,concavet a East a distance of 6os00 inning G the beg 105.00 feet; thence along distance of 5.94.feet a radius of northeasterly and hav r ,,right g distance of 82.47 feet the arc of said curve to� 4 900'00" with a chord bearing of le 6f � thence North through a central angle h� ehd of said curve; inning of a North 68°24'54" West a t 3;63 feet to the beginning feet; 45°54'54" West a distance of.-� awing a radius of Of saic-( ct�Cry tO the left awith a curve concave southwesterl�and.� distance of thence along the arc .,,e of 4405915711• thence h a central a he end of said curve, 35.34 feet throng ° ,53„ Westrto bearing of North 6802415311 80 feet 00 55i17west line South 89005'08" West a along saidewest'15ne North ° ' "West a of Tract 49; thence along BEGINNING. distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT Containing 19,991 square feet. f 1 /l f Page 226 of 745 Address List Collier County Property Appraiser 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 As to interest in and to any parcel included herein Collier County Tax Collector 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 341 l 2 As to interest ipd to any parcel included herein Anna Mongillo Brian P. Patchen, Esquire Earle & Patchen, P. 1000 Brickel Avenue, Suite 1 12 Miami, FL 33131 Parcel 143 • *** OR: 3210 PG: 0754 *** Page 227 of 745 Pt�Rr�Irt� e Lu CD Page 228 of 745 • I G! NA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, Case No. 02-3925CA Parcel No. 143 Vs. ANNA MONGICLO, ET AL, Defendants. STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT INCLUDING ATTORNEVS FEES (experts endin w THIS CAUSE having come on upgn joint motion for the entry of a Final Judgment made by 00 the Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and the aaq M -4 -.a a ci Defendant, ANNA MONGILLO, set forth hereinbelow, and it appearing to the Court that the parties 0 .o were authorized to enter into such motion, and the, Court finding that the compensation to be paid by " a �Q the Petitioner is full just and reasonable for all partiesconcerned, and the Court being fully advised o. a P = in the premises, it is therefore, 0 R ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, ANNA MONGILLO, does have and 4c7% , M o p N a recover of and from the Petitioner the sum of ONE HUNDRED FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 U N p o OG DOLLARS ($105,000.00), in full payment for the property (designated Parcel 143) taken and for damages resulting to the remainder if less than the entire property was taken ,and for all other damages of any nature. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, ANNA MONGILLO, shall receive the .. -M additional sum of THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($31,000.00), which represents the difference between the Order of Taking deposit and this Order. It is further, Page 229 of 745 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that BRIAN P. PATCHEN, P.A., Attorney for Defendant, ANNA MONGILLO, shall receive the sum of ELEVEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($11,880.00), from the Petitioner as payment for the statutory attorney's fee. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction herein as to assess experts fees and costs for Defendant and attorney's fees for supplemental proceedings, if any, which will be determined by this Court at a hearing to be set upon Motion. It is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order, the Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, shall pay to LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN P. PATCHEN, TRUST ACCOUNT,1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1112, Miami, Florida 33131, the sum of FORTY-TWO THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($42,880.00), for proper disbursement in this cause. It is further, ORDERED that title to the following described property, to wit: 0 amb 3, 00 rn b G7 N 00 00 Page 230 of 745 orrnG2% F.P. NO. 2007321 SECTION 03175-2430 STATE ROAD 93 ( I-75 ) COLLIER COUNTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 143 f ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE OBTAINED: FEE SIMPLE A) That portion of Tract 49, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 30, a � subdivision im Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, as N per plat thereof -recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: o V__4 BEGIN at the northwest corner of said Tract 49, said corner being on the survey base lime of the Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886); a thence along the north line of said Tract 49, North 89005'08" o East a distance of 299.86 feet to the northerly extension of the west existing right of way easement of 60TH Street S.W. (per Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida); thence along said west existing right of way easement and the northerly extension thereof South 0005512011 East a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 890o5'0g!' West a distance of 299.86 feet to the west line of said Tract 49; thence along said west line North 0005511711 West a distance -of 75.00 feet to the POINT OF . BEGINNING. Containing 22,489 square feet. Together with all rights of egress, ingr6ss, light, air and view between the grantor's remaining property and any facility constructed on the above described property. ALSO B) That portion -of Tract 49, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 30, a subdivision in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page'58,' Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: 'Page 231 of 745 F.P. NO. 2007321 j� QVr6PTnN 03175-2430 STATE ROAD 93 (I-75) COLLIER -COUNTY 6kIRMAk — PARCEL 143 CONT'D Commence at the northwest corner of said Tract 49.0, said corner being on the survey base line .of the Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886); thence along the west line of said Tract 49,- South 00055017" East a distance of 75.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING;' thence North 89005108" East a distance of 135.81 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 105.00 feet; thence along.the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 82.47 feet through a central angle of 44059157" with a chord bearing South 68024153" East to the end of said curve; o thence South 4-5°54154" East a distance of 73.63 feet to the rn beginning of a curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of N 45.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 35.34 feet through a central angle of 45000100" with cs. a chord bearing South 68024054" East to the end of said curve; thence North 89005!06" East a distance of 5.93 feet to the west o`C>o existing right of way easement of 60TH Street S.W. (per Plat Book r' 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier'County, Florida); thence along said west existing right of way easement South 00055120" a East a distance of 60.00 feet; thence South 89005106" West a o -distance of 5.94.feet to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 105.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve to toe right a distance of 82.47 feet through a central angle of 45°00100" with a chord bearing of North 68024154" West to the end of said curve; thence North 45054154" West a distance of 73.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 45.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 35.34 feet through a central angle of 44059157" with a chord bearing of North 68024153" West to the end of said curve; thence South 89005108". West a distance of..135.80 feet to said west line of Tract 49; thence along said west line North 00055117" West a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 19,991 square feet. Page 232 of 745 3t,,oPr-n622 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Naples, Collier County, Florida this /S day of February, 2007. t Copies to: —David M. Gould, Es uud, /Brian Patchen, Esquire Lawrence Martin Circuit Judge MOTION The parties by and through the undersigned, Stipulated Final Judgment. David M. Gould, Esquire Florida Bar No. 0373590 State of Florida Department of Transportation Post Office Box 1249 Bartow, FL 33831-1249 (863)519-2615 ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER Date: a 2 0 07 Attorney or etitioner e for theSntry of the foregoing .Brian P. VatLhen, Esquire klbrida Bar No. 157545 Law Office of Brian P. Patchen, P.A. 1000 Brickell Avenue Suite 11 II Miami, FL 33 ) 31 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, ANNA MONGILLO r Date: l Attorney for efen ant € Page 233 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) NARRATIVE STATEMENT Page 234 of 745 Bowman Project Gateway RPUD Narrative Statement, LDC Evaluation Criteria & GMP Consistency Introduction The subject property is comprised of 4.18± acres and is in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida ("Property"). The Property is located to the south of Golden Gate Parkway and east of 1-75, at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th St. SW. The entirety of the Property is currently zoned E-Estates and a portion of the Property is within the Corridor Management Overlay (CMO). The Property is located within the Estates/ Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGMP), Urban Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Lands to the north of the subject property across Golden Gate Parkway are a part of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict, lands to the east, south, and west are designated Estates/ Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGMP), Urban Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The zoning and existing land uses on the surrounding lands are as follows: North: Golden Gate Parkway, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with Conditional Uses -Healthcare Services and a Community Facility (Church). South: Zoned E — Estates, developed single-family residential lots. East: 601h St. SW ROW, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with a Conditional Use — Community Facility (Church); West: Zoned E — Estates, developed with single-family residential lots. The applicant intends to rezone the Property from the Estates zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) with a companion Small -Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (SSGMPA PL20230008643) that establishes the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict. The proposed RPUD and companion SSGMPA seek to allow for a maximum of 36 affordable townhouse units at a density of up to 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The entirety of the project, all 36 dwelling units, will include affordable housing in a manner unique to Collier County. Page 1 of 7 Submittal 1 PL20250006068 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239, 254.2000 bowman.com Page 235 of 745 The affordable housing units will be either sold or rented based on the following: • 19 dwelling units will be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. • 17 dwelling units will be made available as rental units to households whose initial certified incomes are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. All 36 units may be purchased by the tenants whose certified incomes at time of entry into a real estate sales contract are up to and including 140% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County or purchased by non -tenants, or those who have not previously occupied the units as a tenant, whose certified incomes at time of entry into a real estate sales contract are up to and including 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. This project provides a unique model to address Collier County's affordable housing needs in a manner that allows tenants, utilizing affordable rentals, the opportunity to enter into home ownership. Additionally, commitments with the PUD document require any sales, after the initial sale, of the affordable units to subsequently be sold to qualifying households for a period of 30 years. The Property is in an ideal location to provide housing for the local workforce as it is central to many other employment opportunities. It is also accessible by multiple forms of transportation, with an exit onto and off 1-75 located just west of the site. The existing Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop adjacent to the north of the Property connects to 6 additional/transfer routes. LDC Evaluation Criteria A. The suitability for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern, as properties directly adjacent to the site are developed for residential use. The surrounding lands to the north are designated Estates, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Lands to the south, east, and west of the Property are designated Estates, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Property is an appropriate location for the proposed affordable housing units, which will help address Collier County's Page 2 of 7 Submittal 1 PL20250006068 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 236 of 745 lack of affordable housing, by providing 100% of the proposed used units as affordable. The site is suitable for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities, and public services, and there are no limitations regarding the physical characteristics of the land that would limit its suitability for what is existing and proposed B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. Evidence of unified control is provided with this application. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, policies, and the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -District, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -District, policy or other provision.) The proposed RPUD conforms with the applicable goals and objectives of the Growth Management Plan as amended to include the proposed Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict companion SSGMPA. Future Land Use Element Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan... Assuming the companion SSGMPA Amendment is approved, then the proposed RPUD is deemed to be consistent with all applicable Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). Page 3 of 7 Submittal 1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P:239.254.2000 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 237 of 745 Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by. confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban... The subject site and surrounding lands to the north, south, east, and west are designated Urban Residential Subdistrict. The proposed development discourages sprawl as it is adjacent to development on the south and west, and lands to the north and east are separated by roadways. Policy 5.6. New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted Jun 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed uses are compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses, which include residential development. Development standards and perimeter buffers proposed within the RPUD will ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. Objective 7. Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to front collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the land Development Code. The site is located south of Golden Gate Parkway and west of 601h St. SW, with 62nd St. SW splitting the subject property at its northeast corner. The RPUD Master Plan proposes access on the east side of the subject property on 60th St. SW, directly across from the access to the church on the east side of 60th St. SW. This access will allow residents of the RPUD to access Golden Gate Parkway without passing any other residential development to the south or west. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Page 4 of 7 Submittal 1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 238 of 745 Based on the size of the subject site, loop roads and additional internal access locations are not feasible. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The project will connect to 601h Street SW, a local road. The RPUD Master Plan allows for an access point located on the east side of the subject property to lead to the minor arterial road (Golden Gate Parkway). Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The proposed RPUD supports this policy by providing 8.6 dwelling units per acre to an property with differing densities within a 1-mile radius, and in a location with direct access to a Transit stop. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural -Industrial District and Rural -Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria... The proposed RPUD rezoning will meet the required minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards or mitigate offsite as allowed by the LDC. Objective 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats... No Listed Species were observed on -site, as provided for in the Listed Species Survey section of the submitted Environmental Data. Page 5 of 7 Submittal 1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 239 of 745 Transportation Element Policy S.1 of the Transportation Element notes that at rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five- year planning period. There is no significant impact associated with a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five-year planning periods. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between development to facilitate convenient movement through the road network. The proposed RPUD will not hinder the existing connection of local streets that serve the surrounding residential area. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed residential use, site design, proposed development standards, placement of buffering, and the open space ensures its compatibility with the surrounding area. design, and setback standards will further ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed RPUD will provide adequate usable open space at 40% of the subject site, as described in the Deviations and Justifications supplemental document. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The County charges impact fees (or similar fees) to ensure that there is funding to make any necessary capacity improvements related to sewer and water services, Page 6of7 Submittal 1 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 240 of 745 roads, public schools, government buildings including jails, regional and community parks, EMS, libraries, and law enforcement. The developer will be responsible for the cost of any site -related improvements, including, but not limited to, access improvements and conveyance -related improvements to the water and/or sewer distribution system. There will be a requirement to demonstrate "concurrency" at the time of future subdivision plats or Site Development Plan(s) for this project. The concurrency process ensures that the County has the capacity for Category "A" public facilities and services at the time that project related impacts will affect (require) such services and facilities. Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in the various elements of the Collier County GMP, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. G. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. There are no issues that would limit the ability of the subject property or the surrounding areas to accommodate this project. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The RPUD conforms to the LDC regulations, or contains deviations there from, where appropriate. Page 7of7 Submittal 1 PL20250006068 Narrative and Evaluation Criteria (8-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 241 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) REZONE CRITERIA Page 242 of 745 Bowman Project Gateway RPUD Rezone Criteria LDC Section 10.02.08.F. - Nature of requirements of Planning Commission Report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and accommodations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC (Land Development Code) Sec. 10.02.08.E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. A companion SSGMPA application (PL20250006066) has been made to create the Project Gateway Residential Subdistrict to ensure compliance between the GMP and the proposed Residential Planned Unite Development (RPUD). Assuming the proposed GMPA is approved, the RPUD will be consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) goals, objectives, and policies, and Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and the goals, objectives and policies as applicable, of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing land use pattern which is a mix of residential and community facility uses. The subject property ("Property") is undeveloped and located on the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 60th St. SW., approximately 1,400 feet east of the Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75 interchange. The entirety of the Property is currently zoned E-Estates and a portion of the Property is within the Corridor Management Overlay (CMO). The Property is located within the Golden Gate Area and Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element, specifically within the Residential Estates Subdistrict. The zoning and existing land uses on the surrounding lands are as follows: North: Golden Gate Parkway, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with Conditional Uses -Healthcare Services and a Community Facility (Church). South: Zoned E - Estates, developed single-family residential lots. Page 1 of 6 Submittal 1 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 243 of 745 3. East: 60th St. SW ROW, with Estates zoning beyond, developed with a Conditional Use — Community Facility (Church); West: Zoned E — Estates, developed with single-family residential lots. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern which consists of residential and community facility uses in the immediate vicinity, commercial areas located approximately over one-half mile to the east of the subject property. Further, the proposed RPUD includes development standards, enhanced buffers on the west and south perimeters, adjacent the Estates zoned residential uses, as well as building height limitations that are compatible with single-family neighborhoods. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This rezoning will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed Project Gateway RPUD provides a unique opportunity to provide affordable housing in a manner that promotes home ownership in an area adjacent to Estates designated lots that have been developed with single-family residences. The Property is located on the south side of a minor arterial roadway (Golden Gate Parkway) and located at the corner of two roadways (62nd St. SW and 60th St. SW.) that provide access to Golden Gate Parkway. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. Existing boundaries were not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions in the neighborhood. S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Changing conditions do not make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary; however, changing conditions do make the proposed amendment desirable and appropriate. Market conditions at the present time make it feasible to allow for viable multi -family residential development that can support the affordable housing component of the Collier County Future Land Use Element. Page 2of6 Submittal 1Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx PL20250006068 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254,2000 bowman.com Page 244 of 745 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The development standards proposed, such as landscape buffers, setbacks, maximum building height requirements, and dark sky lighting commitments, ensure compatibility with neighboring properties. The property will have access to Golden Gate Parkway, which has the capacity to handle the traffic to be generated by the proposed project. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed change will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses or otherwise affect public safety. A TIS consistent with County methodology for the calculation of trip generation and traffic analysis has been prepared and submitted with this rezoning application. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The site will be designed to meet all County and SFWMD requirements and will comply with Florida Administrative Code 62-330. No drainage problems will be created by the proposed change. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development standards regarding building height and perimeter landscape buffers assure the proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10.Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. If approved, the proposed change will likely increase the property values in the Page 3 of 6 Submittal 1 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.2542000 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 245 of 745 surrounding area by providing an attractive, high -quality multi -family residential development. 11.Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The surrounding properties are developed with residential and community facilities. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The standards and conditions within proposed PUD will not be applicable to lands outside of the PUD boundary; and will not affect the ability of adjacent property owners to go through a similar zoning entitlement process. 12.Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations, as adjacent property owners can develop their properties as they see fit under the regulations of the existing zoning district; or go through a similar planning and zoning entitlement process. The individual owner of the property will not have any special privileges regarding the proposed change. This project will create affordable housing that benefits Collier County and its residents. 13.Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. Although the existing Estates zoning does not allow for the proposed multi -family development or the proposed density, the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) allow for land use and zoning change opportunities to assist with furthering their goal of creating more affordable housing. Furthermore, the proposed affordable housing units will contribute to the alleviation of the need for affordable housing units in the County. The site is within the Urban area and there are sufficient public facilities to support the proposed density and intensity. 14.Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Page 4 of 6 Submittal 1 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 246 of 745 The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. According to the draft 2021 — 2025 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Human Community Development (Consolidated Plan) prepared for the Collier County Public Services Department, Community and Human Services division, "There is not a sufficient supply for low- and moderate -income households in Collier County" and "A significant lack of affordable housing existing particularly for the approximately one in four households that are at the low or very -low income levels" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 86). The Consolidated Plan goes on to identify housing affordability as "high priority level" need. The proposed subdistrict will help the County achieve the overarching goals of the Consolidated Plan "To provide decent housing by ... increasing the availability of affordable housing" and "To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low- and moderate -income residents throughout the County, [and] increased housing opportunities" (Consolidated Plan, pg. 7 72). 15.Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed uses already permitting such use; however, the proposed development is the highest and best use of this property as it is within Urban Collier County. There are sufficient public facilities to serve the site, including easy access to Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75, and the property is adjacent to other residential developments. 16.The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification is typical of and not different from any other similar development in Collier County. 17.The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Page 5of6 Submittal 1 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 P: 239.254.2000 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx bowman.com Page 247 of 745 Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. 11], as amended. There is availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to serve the project. 18.Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Page 6of6 Submittal 1 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx PL20250006068 Rezone Criteria (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 248 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) DEVIATION AND JUSTIFICATION Page 249 of 745 Bowman Project Gateway RPUD Deviations and Justifications 1. The deviation requests relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1, Open space requirements, which states PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses shall provide at least 60 percent of the gross area devoted to usable open space to instead allow 40 percent of the gross area be devoted to usable open space. Justification: The proposed 40% open space deviation is justified. Project Gateway RPUD will be developed on approximately 4.18 acres of land and will construct up to 36 multifamily dwelling units in the form of townhouses that will act as income restricted affordable housing, for which the demand is well - documented. The applicant is proposing a project that has comparable building heights to the adjacent residential zoning districts. Due to the size of the parcel and the need to provide individual driveways to each townhouse, meeting the 60% usable open space standard would render the site unusable for proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has proposed enhanced landscape buffers adjacent to the Estate zoning located on the south and west portion of the development. Page 1 of 1 Submittal 1 Project Gateway Deviations and Justifications (08-15-2025).docx 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 PL20250006068 Project Gateway Deviations and Justifications (08-15-2025).docx P: 239.254.2000 bowman.com Page 250 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT Page 251 of 745 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT COMMUNITY LAND TRUST 60TH ST SW/ 62ND ST. SW NAPLES, FL 34116 FOLIO #38164120005 JUNE 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & _ ASSOCIATES INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE: 239-G43-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Page 252 of 745 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................1 2 Existing Conditions Pre-Development.........................................................................................................2 2.1 FLUCFCS Codes and Habitat Descriptions...........................................................................................2 2.2 Vegetative Associations............................................................................................................................2 2.2.1 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (Exotics 50-75%) (3.68 acres)........................................................................2 2.2.2 814 Roads and Highways (0.31 acres)................................................................................................3 2.2.3 191 Undeveloped Land within urban areas (0.19 Acres).................................................................3 2.3 Wetlands & Other Surface Waters..........................................................................................................3 2.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod.....................................................................4 2.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters.........................................................4 2.4 Listed Plant and Animal Species.............................................................................................................4 2.5 Soils.............................................................................................................................................................5 2.5.1 128 - Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum - Urban Land Complex.....................................5 3 Proposed Conditions (Post Development)...................................................................................................7 3.1 Proposed Project........................................................................................................................................7 3.2 Native Habitat...........................................................................................................................................7 3.3 Project Impacts to Archaeological & Historical Resources..................................................................7 3.4 Elimination and Reduction of Impacts...................................................................................................7 3.5 Project Impact to Listed Species..............................................................................................................8 4 Project Consistency with CCME....................................................................................................................8 5 Photos................................................................................................................................................................11 AppendixA: Exhibits................................................................................................................................................1 Appendix B: Listed Species Survey........................................................................................................................2 Appendix C: Initial Coordination with Division of Historical Resources.....................................................3 Page 253 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 1 INTRODUCTION The Community Land Trust property is approximately 4.18 acres in size, located in between 62nd St SW and 60th St SW in Naples, Florida 34116, which is within Section 29, Township 49 South, and Range 26 East in Collier County and can be identified by folio number 38164120005. The current proposed development includes the construction of a multi -family residential project with 36 planned units. The undeveloped property is zoned as Agricultural, with a Corridor Management overlay at the north of the property. A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and a subsequent Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Collier County will be required. This document provides information concerning the proposed project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It will be submitted to Collier County as part of the permit request made by the applicant. Page 254 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PRE -DEVELOPMENT The subject property is located approximately 0.40 miles east of I-75 on 62nd ST SW. The site is currently undeveloped and is bordered by developed single-family residential parcels to its south and west; by 62nd ST SW & Golden Gate Parkway to the north and 60th St SW to the east. Aerial imagery shows evidence that the site has remained undeveloped since 1985. The project site is composed of three land use types: Pine Flatwoods (Exotics 50-75%), Roads and Highways, and Undeveloped Land within urban areas. The historic soil mapped on -site was designated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as "Pineda fine sand - Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes" which is not a hydric soil. 2.1 FLUCFCS CODES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all of the vegetative communities occurring within the parcel boundaries. The attached FLUCFCS exhibit shows the subject property together with its vegetative cover and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 1. Table 1: FLUCFCS Codes and Descriptions of Community Ty pes FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional Wetlands OSW 411E3 Pine Flatwoods Exotics 50-75% 3.68 No 814 Roads and Highways 0.31 No 191 Undeveloped Land within urban areas 0.19 No Total: 4.18 2.2 VEGETATIVE ASSOCIATIONS There are no rare or exceptional vegetative associations present on the project site. The vegetation on the site is dominated by exotic species with scattered native trees, shrubs, and groundcover, that are not maintained by the current property owner. Native vegetation assemblage is present and meets the County definition of a native habitat, therefore the property would require a preserve component as part of a multifamily development. 2.2.1 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (Exotics 50-75%) (3.68 acres) Pine Flatwoods are common in South Florida and are typically dominated by South Florida slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Historically, longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) were common on drier sites while slash pines, which are less fire-resistant, were confined to moister sites; wildfire being the contributing factor in this distribution. The canopy of the Pine Flatwoods on -site is dominated by slash pine and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) with few dispersed bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia) and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) 2 Page 255 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 are present in the midstory. The ground cover consists primarily of leaf duff with patches of muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), myrsine (Myrsine cubana), and carrotwood (Cupaniopsis anacardioides). A list of the vegetative species observed on -site is provided below in Table 2. Table 2: Species Observed in the Pine Flatwoods Community Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Wetland Designation Est. Coverage Slash pine Pinus elliottii C, S UPL 24 Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculi ormis C, S, G FAC 21 Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, S, G FAC 17 Bald cypress Taxodium disticlzum C, S OBL 6 Brazilian pepper Sclzinus terebinthi olia S, G FAC 15 Bracken fern Pteridium a uilinum G FACU 7 Muscadine Vitis rotundi olia G FAC 6 Carrotwood anio sis anacardioides PMY?rsine S, G FAC 5 M rsine cubana G FAC 4 C = Canopy S = Subcanopy G = Groundcover V = Vine OBL = Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative UPL = Upland OBL - Obligate Wetland FACW = Facultative Wetland FAC = Facultative FACU = Facultative Upland UPL = Upland 2.2.2 814 Roads and Highways (0.31 acres) Areas in Florida designated as Roads and Highways are utilized for transportation, for the movement of people and goods. In this case, a portion of 62nd ST SW and 60th St SW are included within the property boundary. 2.2.3 191 Undeveloped Land within urban areas (0.19 Acres) Areas in Florida, designated as Undeveloped Land within Urban Areas, consist of parcels that remain largely unimproved or vacant within the boundaries of urban development. These lands are typically found interspersed among residential, commercial, or industrial zones and have not been developed for any specific urban use. In this case, the property includes a portion of land that has been historically cleared, likely during the original development of the surrounding area, but has since remained unused. The area is periodically mowed by the county. This classification indicates the land is not currently serving a built-up or agricultural function but remains as an open undeveloped space within the urban matrix. 2.3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) were followed in determining whether an 3 Page 256 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. 2.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High -Water Table & Hydroperiod The water table within the site was not visible when staff sampled the soil during the initial environmental assessment. Staff did not observe signs of watermarks, elevated lichen lines, or other water level indicators that would show evidence of a prolonged period of inundation. 2.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands and Other Surface Waters The wetlands definition in Chapter 62-340(19), F.A.C. states that wetlands are those areas "inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils." The methodology used to delineate a wetland boundary as described in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. uses a series of tests in order to determine the presence of a wetland. These definitions were met on part of the subject property. In order to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, a community must display two out of three of the following characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators. These characteristics are defined in Chapter 62-340, F.A.C. The site contained sparsely dispersed bald cypress, which is a hydrophytic species, nut the density of trees present was not dominant. Additionally, the cypress observed did not present elevated lichen lines, watermarks, or active cypress knees. The trees were uniformly thin from base to trunk, and did not display buttressing. The cypress presentation confirms that the site does not support inundations for extended periods of time. The lack of vegetation, hydric soil indicators, and hydrologic indicators lead to the conclusion that there are no wetlands on the project site and surface waters are not present. 2.4 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES Endangered species are as any species of plant, insect, or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, whose prospects of survival are in jeopardy due to modification or loss of habitat; over -utilization for commercial, sporting, scientific or educational purposes; disease; predation; inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms; or other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (F.S. 372.072). Threatened species include any species of plant or wildlife naturally occurring in Florida, which may not be in immediate danger of extinction, but which exist in such small populations as to become endangered if it is subjected to increased stress as a result of further modification of its environment. Several listed animal species have the potential to occur on -site. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. It is 4 Page 257 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 improbable that most of these species currently reside or nest on -site. A list of potential listed species and their designations are provided below in Table 3. Table 3: Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus P Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia ST Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon cou eri FT Florida bonneted bat Eumo s oridanus FE Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE Gopher tortoise Go herus polyphemus ST Least tern Sternula antillarum ST Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened ST = State Threatened P = Protected FT (S/A) = Federally designated Threatened species due to Similarity of Appearance Surveys for listed animal and plant species were conducted within the project area by THA biologists. The threatened and endangered species survey efforts and their results are outlined in the attached Listed Species Survey report. The Listed Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the referenced surveys. During the survey events, staff did not observe any of the species listed above on -site. 2.5 SOILS According to the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), one soil type is mapped at the subject property: (1) "Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum -Urban land complex" (code 128), which is not a hydric soil. The following sub -section provides a brief description of the soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e., its typical location in the landscape on a county -wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e., textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: 2.5.1 128 — Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum - Urban Land Complex Urban land consists of areas that are 50 percent or more covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, shopping centers, highways, industrial areas, airports, and other urban structures. Small areas of undisturbed soils are mostly lawns, vacant lots, playgrounds, and green areas. The original soil in some areas has been altered by filling, grading, and shaping. Urban land is nearly level except for some parking areas that are sloped to drain off water. Individual areas are usually rectangular in shape and range from 10 to 1,200 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. 5 Page 258 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 The soil included in this unit is Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum, which makes up 100 percent of the unit. Pineda fine sand is a very deep, nearly level, poorly drained soil formed in thick beds of sandy and loamy marine sediments, typically found on broad low flats, hammocks, sloughs, depressions, poorly defined drainageways, and floodplains in southern and central Florida. The limestone substratum is generally present at depths greater than 60 inches. The depth of the water table varies with the amount of fill material and the extent of artificial drainage within any mapped area. Urban land will remain in its present use; therefore, no other uses are rated. This map unit has not been assigned a capability class. 0 Page 259 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS POST DEVELOPMENT) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT Historically, the site has remained undeveloped and will be impacted under the proposed project. The current plan for the GMPA and PUD intends to convert the undeveloped parcel to a multi- family residential development through the construction of 36 planned units. The entire site has not been impacted and contains native vegetation that will necessitate preservation requirement as a part of the development proposed. There are no wetland impacts associated with the project. 3.2 NATIVE HABITAT The Collier County Land Development Code (LDC 3.05.07 H.Le.) requires that the preservation of native vegetation shall include all naturally occurring strata including canopy, understory and ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible. The term native vegetation is further defined as a vegetative community having 25 percent or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. In the absence of other native strata, herbaceous vegetation not typically associated with the re -growth of native vegetative communities, commonly known as weeds, shall not be considered native vegetation for the purpose of preservation. The LDC states that if the area of the site is less than 5.0 acres and it's outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), then it will require a 10% preservation area. The property contains 3.68 acres of land that is considered a native habitat; therefore 0.37 acres of native preserve will be required. Due to the small size limitations of the property for the proposed project, the property owner will be exploring off -site preservation to meet the code requirement. 3.3 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted by THA staff and confirmed that there are no historic or archaeological sites present within Section 29, Township 49S, Range 26E. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. Coordination between the MSF office and THA staff can be seen attached in Appendix C. 3.4 ELIMINATION AND REDUCTION OF IMPACTS The subject property has been chosen because of the upland habitat. As such, no wetland or surface water impacts are proposed in association with the project. tI Page 260 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 3.5 PROJECT IMPACT TO LISTED SPECIES There are several listed species that have the potential to occur on -site or nearby, but the surrounding development limits the potential for any of these species to be present. The anticipated impacts to these species is minimized and are discussed in more detail within the Listed Species Survey Report in Appendix B of this document. 4 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH COME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. Goal 1: To plan for the protection, conservation, management, and appropriate use of the County's natural resources. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. The site will require off -site preservation to meet the native habitat preservation requirement. Goal 2: To protect the County's surface and estuarine water resources. The project will be reviewed by County reviewers during the zoning request. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. Goal 3: To protect the County's groundwater resources to ensure the highest water quality practical. The project will undergo review by the SFWMD as part of the permitting process for water quality certification. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation are permitted through SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored annually to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. Goal 4: To conserve, protect, and appropriately manage the County's freshwater resources. There are no on -site freshwater resources. Any irrigation use will be monitored to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. If applicable and available, the Project may utilize treated effluent (re -use) water for irrigation if such water is available. 0 Page 261 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 Goal 5: To protect, conserve, and appropriately use the County's mineral and soil resources. No mineral extraction is proposed in association with the proposed project. The project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. Goal 6: To identify, protect, conserve, and appropriately use native vegetative communities and wildlife habitat. Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that projects preserve a portion of their on -site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the site. The vegetative communities present within the subject property meet the Collier County requirement of a native habitat. Since the Lombardo Community Land Trust property is less than 5.0 acres in size and qualifies as "Residential Development," under LDC 3.05.07 B.1., it is required to preserve 10% of existing native vegetation on or off of the site. The property contains 3.68 acres of land that is considered a native habitat; therefore 0.37 acres of native preserve will be required. Off -site preservation of native habitat is proposed in association with the current project. Goal 7: To protect and conserve the County's fisheries and wildlife. The project has conducted a Listed Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to ensure that new species do not take up residence on the project lands without knowledge before construction commencement. Coordination and review with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) will be undertaken as needed to ensure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. Goal 8: To maintain Collier County's existing air quality The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. Goal 9: To appropriately manage hazardous materials and waste to protect the County's populous and natural resources and to ensure the highest environmental quality. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. Goal 10: To protect, conserve, manage, and appropriately use the County's coastal barriers including shorelines, beaches, and dunes and plan for, and where appropriate, restrict activities where such activities will damage coastal resources. Page 262 of 745 Community Land Trust Environmental Supplement June 2025 This project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. Goal 11: To provide for the protection, reservation, and sensitive re -use of historic resources. Preliminary communication with the Florida Division of Historical Resources was conducted; there are no historic or archaeological resources within the site's section. Goal 12: To make every reasonable effort to ensure the public safety, health, and welfare of people and property from the effects of hurricane storm damage. The project is not located within the County's Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On -site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. Goal 13: To avoid unnecessary duplication of existing regulatory programs The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD and FWC. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. Page 263 of 745 pry tin \ rNul Fx , APPENDIX A: EXHIBITS Page 265 of 745 STATE OF FLORIDA CITY 4M PA FT.MYER9 J APL S M o' v nl=r vvEST COLLIER COUNTY VICINITY MAP �� e �•� ,� � SUBJECT PROPERTY ! P �4 rf+ � � ( - i t{, 1: � SITE ADDRESS:" r > r., <> FOLIO #: 38164120005 <> LATITUDE: N 26.173491- • 62ND ST SW <> LONGITUDE: W-81.728035� NAPLES, FL 34116 ' NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. y r tit : ,r W� �f'!"w :-�►j f! COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED R 1. Marine&Environmental Consulting LOMBARDO — COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DRAWN Eo" 06;7-25 a JOB NO 25053 a 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO 15 Email: tunaflothanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RYNO. 5875 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE- 7- Page 266 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PKWY f 62ND ST SW I. Oft k 6 ? q' &AEZ7N7EE7 r " I f ai. 1 PROPERTY°'"' p _ O BOUNDARY �. _ FLUCFCS DESCRIPTION (AC) -f UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN URBAN � AREAS A 1s1 0.19 411E3 PINE FLATWOODS (EXOTICS 50-75%) 3.68 i ;rUilk 814 ROADS AND HIGHWAYS 0.31 TOTAL 4.18 UPLAND (ACRES): 4.18 ^, WETLAND (ACRES): U ®PROJECT (ACRES): 4.18 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - SURVEY COURTESY OF "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED. MM-OD-YYYY " Turrell, Hall & Associates, Il le. DESIGNED AP Marine & Em'ironmental Consulting LOMBARDO — COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DEW Eo" r,;7.25 ; f _! 020 F 4 - g p FLUCFCS MAP �% 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO 020F03 s Email: mna(aohanaplesxcnn Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 RYN0.5875 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-26E Page 267 of 745 Lt oo I ly o roo 200 400 y _ y ffi GOLDEN GATE PKWY AIM 621VD ST SW - P - p � � tat, -- -T � f• • y a: .� 7. . s I I tiEE PROPERTY !BOUNDARY } Ly S NOTES: M " CODE DESCRIPTION HYDRIC ACRES THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENOED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. l �•+ PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SURVEY COURTESY OF "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SUBSTRATUM -URBAN LAND COMPLEX SURVEY DATED: MM-00-YYYY SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY: 21D23 UNRED STATES DEFT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AR FL DESIGNED: AP- Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. LOMBARDO - COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DRAWN NBYEATE 105,17.25 a Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 125053 4, 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SOILS MAP SHEET NO.: 030F03 5. Email:tuna(w,thanaples.com Phone:(239) 643.0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RY NO. M75 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-26E Page 268 of 745 APPENDIX B: LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Page 269 of 745 LISTED SPECIES REPORT COMMUNITY LAND TRUST 60TH ST SW / 62ND ST. SW NAPLES, FL 34116 FOLIO #38164120005 JUNE 2025 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL &� ASSOCIATES, INC. Marine & Environmental Consulting PHONE:239-643-0166 WWW.THANAPLES.COM Page 270 of 745 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................... ..................................................................................................1 2 Methodology.......................................................................................................................................2 3 Preliminary Research.........................................................................................................................3 4 Existing Conditions............................................................................................................................4 5 Results..................................................................................................................................................5 5.1 Species Observed On-site........................................................................................................ 5 6 Discussion........................................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Proposed Project....................................................................................................................... 6 6.2 Potential Impacts to Listed Species........................................................................................ 6 6.2.1 Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi)................................................................. 6 6.2.2 Gopher tortoise Go herus of hemus ........................ 6 6.2.3 Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)............................................................................6 6.2.4 Least tern (Sternula antillarum)....................................................................................... 7 6.2.5 Red cockaded woodpecker Leuconoto icus borealis ........ 7 6.2.6 Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia).......................................................7 6.2.7 Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus)....................................................................7 6.2.8 Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi)........................................................................... 7 7 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................8 Page 271 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 1 INTRODUCTION Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) has conducted listed species surveys at 60th St SW/62nd St SW in Naples, Florida 34116, located within Section 29, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, in Collier County. The parcel can be identified by folio number 38164120005 and has a total size of approximately 4.18 acres. The proposed development includes the construction of a multi -family residential development. The undeveloped property is currently zoned as Agricultural, with a Corridor Management overlay at the north of the property. A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and a subsequent Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Collier County will be required. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of wildlife observations on the property and to consider potential effects of the proposed project on any local, state, or federal listed species that may utilize the property for refuge, foraging, or nesting. Page 272 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 2 METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat types in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Prior to conducting any survey, several publications and references are consulted. These include The Official List of Florida's Endangered Species, Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (dated December 2022), Florida's Imperiled Species Management Plan, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Species Conservation Measures and Permitting Guidelines, the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI), and Collier County aerial photography. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that wildlife species are utilizing the subject site. This site may be comprised of a primary or secondary foraging zone, a nesting zone, or it may be merely adjacent to those sites with regard to a particular listed species. As many listed species in Florida are cryptic and/or nocturnal, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photography and the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) maps of the site and surrounding area were consulted before arriving on -site. After thorough consideration of the existing habitats, a potential list of species that could be found on - site was developed. The required survey procedure for each species was then followed to determine if any listed species was utilizing the subject property. A system of linear transects was followed between the entirety of the parcel, with special consideration given towards protocols for surveying wading birds, fox squirrels, gopher tortoises, and other anticipated or potential species which could occur on the project lands. Biologists traversed the entire site in a series of linear transects spaced approximately 25 to 50 feet apart. Most of the site is heavily vegetated which affected the visibility during the surveying effort. A slow pace along each transect was maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rooting, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks, and scat were looked for and duly noted. OA Page 273 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 3 PRELIMINARY RESEARCH Prior to field investigations, aerial photos, soil maps, and prior surveys and mapping for the property were reviewed to identify the various vegetation associations that are potentially present on and adjacent to the project area. Various publications and databases were reviewed to identify listed plant and wildlife species which could occur and those that had been previously documented on or near the project site, and also to gather information concerning listed species. Based on the habitat types that were identified, existing knowledge of the project area, contacts with other consultants, and review of publications and databases, a preliminary list of listed plant and animal species with the potential to occur within or near the project area was determined. As used herein, the term "listed animal species' refers to those animals listed as endangered or threatened by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). THA's wildlife and listed species surveys were supplemented by research on listed species. The following subsections document these efforts and their results. A list of listed species that could potentially utilize the subject property can be found below in Table 1. Table 1: Potential Threatened and Endangered Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucoce halus P Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia ST Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon cou eri FT Florida bonneted bat Eumo s oridanus FE Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Least tern Sternula antillanim ST Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened ST = State Threatened P = Protected FT (S/A) = Federally Designated Threatened Species due to Similarity of Appearance 3 Page 274 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property is located approximately 0.4 miles east of I-75 on 62nd ST SW. The site is currently undeveloped and is bordered by developed single-family residential parcels to its south and west; by 62nd ST SW to the north and 60th St SW to the east. Aerial imagery shows evidence that the site has remained undeveloped since 1985. The project site is composed of three land use types: Pine Flatwoods (Exotics 50-75%), Roads and Highways, and County Maintained. The historic soil mapped on -site was designated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as "Pineda fine sand - Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes' which is not a hydric soil. The Lombardo Community Land Trust project encompasses approximately 4.18 acres, including 3.68 acres of uplands, 0.31 acres of Roads and Highways, and 0.19 acres of Undeveloped Land within urban areas. Currently, the majority of the subject property is zoned as Undeveloped Agriculture. The entirety of the project site has not been impacted by anthropogenic activities. The Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) manual was used to classify all vegetative communities occurring within the site boundaries. The FLUCFCS exhibit attached to the Environmental Supplement report shows the subject property together with its vegetative cover and depicts the approximate limits of the wetland and upland areas. A general description is provided below in Table 2. More detailed descriptions of the various vegetative communities and any site -specific nuances can be found in the relative Environmental Supplement report. Table 2: FLUCFCS Codes and Descrintions FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Jurisdictional Wetlands/ OSW 411E3 Pine Flatwoods Exotics 50-75% 3.68 No 814 Roads and Highways 0.31 No 191 Undeveloped Land within urban areas 0.19 No Total: 1 4.18 4 Page 275 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 5 RESULTS During the surveys conducted on -site, THA biologists did not observe any of the listed species as specified in 5.1 below. The subject property was surveyed for a total of 2 hours. A summary of survey times and weather on -site is displayed below in Table 3. Table 3: Summary of Survey Efforts Date Start End Survey Hours Temp. °F Cloud Cover Precip. In. Wind (mph) 06 12 2025 1315 1415 1.00 87 Partly Cloudy 0.1 6 NW 06 24 2025 0700 0800 1.00 75 Sunny 0.0 6 SW 5.1 SPECIES OBSERVED ON -SITE No listed species were observed on -site or flying overhead by THA biologists. In addition to surveying the subject property for listed species, biologists recorded sightings and signs of non - listed wildlife. All wildlife that was observed on, above, or adjacent to the project site is displayed below in Table 4. Table 4: List of Species Observed On -site Common Name Scientific Name Status Reptiles Brown anole Anolis sn rei Non-native Brown basilisk Basiliscus vittatus Non-native Birds American crow Corvus brach rh nchos Blue jay C anocitta cristata Boat -tailed grackle Qttiscalus mexicanus Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Common ground dove Columbina asserina Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis House wren Troglodytes aedon Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos White Ibis Eudocimus albus Mammals Eastern grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Virginia opossum Didel his virginiana FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened ST = State Threatened 5 Page 276 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 6 DISCUSSION 6.1 PROPOSED PROJECT Historically, the site has remained undeveloped and will be impacted under the proposed project. The proposed GMPA and PUD plan to convert the undeveloped parcel to a multi -family development through the construction of residential units. The site contains native vegetation which will require preservation either on -site or offsite. There are no wetland impacts associated with the project. 6.2 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES 6.2.1 Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) is listed as federally threatened. Generally, this species lives and hunts in a wide variety of habitats, and its territory can cover large areas. It can be associated with gopher tortoise burrows (as a commensal), and it favors pine flatwoods, palmetto prairies, and scrub habitats as well as wetland edges. It is relatively reclusive in nature and is rarely observed in the wild. No eastern indigo snakes have been observed on -site- however, indigo snakes could potentially traverse if there are snakes in the area. No burrows or other refugia were noted on the property. Immediately prior to construction work being performed on the subject property, an eastern indigo snake survey will have to be conducted to ensure indigo snakes are not utilizing areas where large equipment will be operated. Special construction guidelines to protect the indigo snake shall be followed by construction personnel during all phases of construction work performed on -site. 6.2.2 Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is listed as state threatened. Generally, gopher tortoises prefer well -drained, sandy soils, typically found in habitats such as longleaf pine sandhills, xeric oak hammocks, scrub, pine flatwoods, dry prairies, and coastal dunes. No gopher tortoises or burrows were observed during the survey efforts. Gopher tortoises were included due to their known presence on the surrounding upland areas. Should any tortoises establish a burrow on the property, appropriate permitting will be undertaken with FWC to relocate the tortoise. 6.2.3 Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) While the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No nests were observed on -site or in the surrounding areas, therefore, impacts to the Bald eagle is not expected. Page 277 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 6.2.4 Least tern (Sternula antillarum) The least tern (Sternula antillarum) is a state -threatened species of shorebird that typically nests in mixed colonies on sandy beaches. They also utilize gravel rooftops and will occasionally nest in sand mines, temporary mining sand tailings, construction sites, causeways, agricultural fields, parking lots, and other bare lands. There is potential that least terns could utilize bare lands during construction, but given the current conditions of the site, nesting is not likely. THA biologists did not observe any least terns on -site and no impacts to their population are anticipated. 6.2.5 Red cockaded woodpecker (Leuconotopicus borealis) The red -cockaded woodpecker (Leuconotopicus borealis) is a federally endangered species that primarily inhabits mature pine forests, particularly those dominated by longleaf pine. This species depends on older pine trees for nesting and roosting, often creating cavities in living trees that are infected with red heart fungus, which softens the wood. Red -cockaded woodpeckers prefer open, park -like stands with minimal midstory vegetation. The current project site contains suitable mature pine habitat and structural characteristics required by this species. Therefore, there is potential for the presence of red -cockaded woodpeckers on the property. THA biologists did not observe any red -cockaded woodpeckers during the site visit, however, a tree cavity that is suitable nesting habitat was located. 6.2.6 Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) The Big Cypress fox squirrel has not been observed on -site. They often prefer suburban habitats, including golf courses and residential areas. No evidence of use or presence was observed during the species surveys. Therefore, impacts to the Big Cypress fox squirrel is not expected. 6.2.7 Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The site contained several pine snags and one hollow bald cypress with potential for future roosting. GPS points and photographs were taken of the tree cavity. This site provides an appropriate habitat that could be used by Florida bonneted bat for roosting. No evidence of roosting was observed but a follow up survey before construction will be required to ensure that no roosting occurred after this survey. 6.2.8 Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) The Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) is listed as federally endangered. This elusive subspecies of cougar primarily inhabits large, contiguous tracts of forested habitat, including cypress swamps, pinelands, hardwood hammocks, and upland prairies. Florida panthers require expansive territories to support their wide-ranging movements and hunting activities. No Florida panthers have been observed on -site. However, the property is located within the potential range of the Florida panther, and suitable habitat features are present. 7 Page 278 of 745 Community Land Trust Listed Species Report June 2025 7 CONCLUSION THA performed a listed species survey of the approximately 4.18-acre subject property in Collier County, Florida. Preliminary research was supplemented with 2 hours of on -site investigation. No listed species were observed on -site or flying overhead and no impacts to any listed species is anticipated with the proposed development of the subject property. The proposed project is to clear existing vegetation and construct a 36-unit, multi -family residential development on the currently undeveloped parcel. Off -site preservation of a natural habitat will be required to remain complaint with the Collier County LDC. Based on THA's observations, provided the development of this site provides appropriate design and management guidelines, it will not adversely affect any endangered, threatened, or otherwise protected species. These management guidelines shall be coordinated with the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies to better ensure their protection. Page 279 of 745 v 2, 0 4 0 om Is ° •ti° J s - - 251� Rw. LV 4• ' l' PROPERTY BOUNDARY — — Y Y / - 1 30+ a w ,• r 3 a V h h - i > v' Legend QPROPERTY BOUNDARY - BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION AREA s BONNETED BATFOCAL AREAS 5 nv rkr re Twe" Hall &Associates, IncCREATED: Marine& Environmental Consulting 34R4 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Na,,.. FL 34104-3732 En>ad:tunaidthanapImcotn Phcme:(239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643- 632 LOMBARDO - COMMUNITY LAND TRUST BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION MAP DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION SCALE I I " ? 0W 06-20-25 NA FILE PATH r�°530�T�v�;sO zsns�cons earsmxd JOB NO.: 25053 N A SHEET: 01 OF 01 NA SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-26E Page 280 of 745 " N Rd °o - - P(be'RTUpe Rd - - - --- ` - a u 4a_d Ft.. Ytoodt�� 3 L v IAnitnJtlnLwll C i a W C s 3,000 R"5r6,000 }ano e � c QS 4, L 5 - � t�ti y �Innglg C" Napa Wood: way Dogwood lVay Lance'v+ood WJV Gren" Blvd Cedar Tree Ln WeStpwl Lrr 16tb P1 SLa Hunrrr EFtr Golden Gate ,�VMrem� 3 Z o s EU9emH°kraYS o n Caronar4a CAtxy C oppet teat Ln [PROPERTY BOUNDARY .l GottlM Gate PkVV p LO a L ,I n, ._ v- � T a~ 1 Arnold Ave- � MefcanHle Ave � YJ ,.;. O"tnq�n Ln .. Progress Ave C Domesdc Ave m 4d'� ,t enfey o` ^ 4f;.: _. N cn,, F.. rtcrprise Ave p 0.N c Crosd 0 0 9. ty., Legend QPROPERTY BOUNDARY Rr PANTHER CONSULATION AREA PANTHER HABITAT ZONE Primary �1e Secondary ® Dispersal Turrell, Hall &Associates, IncCREATED: DRAWN BY: RMJ I REVISION SCALE: 1 "-0,""0' 06-20-25 N A FILE PATH Marine&Environmentolconsulting LOMBARDO - COMMUNITY LAND TRUST JOB NO.: 25053 N A P250s3oLrdT..1GISammumry 3414 Fxchange Ave. Swte B. Naples, FL 34I04-3732 PANTHER CONSULTATION MAP SHEET: 01 OF 01 NA 2A153 CONS PANTHFRS—d Email: mAhanaples.can Phone:(239)643-0166 Fm:(239)643-6632 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-26E Page 281 of 745 PROPERTY BOUNDARY m ul Legend ` IN PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' RED COCKADED WOODPECKER CONSULTATION AREA ,' ,tea A.. — Turrell, Hall &Associates, IncCREATED: DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: I I - 3.000' 06-30-25 NA FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consuhng LOMBARDO -COMMUNITY LAND TRUST JOB NO.: 25053 N A 50530; `�T-61S° """" 34R4 Exchange Ave. Sune B. Naplec, FL 34104-3732 RED COCKADED WOODPECKER CONSULTATION MAP SHEET: 01 OF01 NA °s3 cnNs ecw.n.a Em il:tun a aPlmcan Phone:(239)643-0166 Fm:(239)643-6632 SECIION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-26E Page 282 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 82ND ST SW���# y TRANSECT LINE (20' O.C)`°� 1 71'4 • �1r. 40 �f rt 4�r r •*. sly •� y r � *!+ "�. � PROPERTY O _ BOUNDARY f TRANSECT LINE (20' O.C.) F ` a a _:77 Y ji sK E t '•�� l�.. �' l ` S o ga �o0 200 SCFtL'E 9N�EE7 ` i s s CAVITY TREE (LAT: 26.17315, LONG:-81.72780) NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND s �' _ ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. S • � _ "� t'�i SURVEY COURTESY OF "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY A_. wjjj�TulTell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED R ; Marine &Environmental Consulting LOMBARDO - COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DRAWN BY 07---02-25 3 JOB NO 25053 C 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 TRANSECT MAP SHEETNO Email: tunala thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RV NO.5875 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANG E-26E A ..y Page 283 of 745 APPENDIX C: INITIAL COORDINATION WITH DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Page 284 of 745 6/20/25, 3:23 PM Mail - Sara Packard - Outlook Q Outlook RE: Request for Historical / Archaeological Resources From Fowler, Christopher G. <Christopher.Fowler@dos.fl.gov> Date Fri 6/20/2025 3:22 PM To Sara Packard <Sara@thanaples.com> Good afternoon, There were no previously recorded resources within the section 29. Please let me know if you have any questions or need a more detailed search. Have a great day. This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. Kind regards, Chris Fowler Assistant Supervisor I Florida Master Site File I Bureau of Historic Preservation I Division of Historical Resources I Florida Department of State 1 500 South Bronough Street I Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.245.6327 1 1.800.847.7278 1 Fax: 850.245.6439 1 f1heritage.com FLONIDA OEPAA'T MENT OF STATE From: Sara Packard <Sara@thanaples.com> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 3:18 PM To: FMSFILE <FMSFILE@dos.fl.gov> Cc: Tim Hall <Tim@thanaples.com> Subject: Request for Historical / Archaeological Resources Good afternoon, hftps://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADUwMjYxMDJhLTY3NGEtNDA3ZC04ZDhjLWMyMD14Mjk4NTFhNAAQACaOrpSGLZ1 Pm9njBLk9XBo%... 1 /2 Page 285 of 745 6/20/25, 3:23 PM Mail - Sara Packard - Outlook I am reaching out to request information on any historical or archaeological resources within Section 29, Township 49 South, and Range 26 East in reference to proposed development in Naples, Florida. Please let me know if you need any additional information to fulfill this request. Sincerely, Sara Packard Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Office: (239) 643-0166 https://outlook.off ce.com/mail/inbox/idlAAQkADUwMjYxMDJhLTY3NGEtNDA3ZC04ZDhjLWMyMD14Mik4NTFhNAAQACaOrpSGLZ1 Pm9njBLk9XBo%... 2/2 Page 286 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) BEAR CALL EXHIBIT Page 287 of 745 s r_ w < 0 Fin uRidge Rd � z a PROPERTY BOUNDARY 40, O a O O • m cou, a Club Z P J Pm a Ri dge,R d • Greets &vd • • • Golden Gate • N 0 1 3 MILE RADIUS • • O Golcrn•ate P • • • • • ,• O • m• o� • �� Legend I+LipF ••adio "'k �'�' ®r � Rd ! O 0 0 so 6% _ Bear Report Date (Total: 219) • + n' • 2023 (QTY: 39) a • n` • /�J� • 2022 (QTY: 33) �` . E Naplas •� ��` pies es -- aa• • �oax;>�r �_ O 2021 (QTY: 25) O t ~• • •� 0 2020 (QTY: 57) ,4 \• o • • 2019 (QTY: 65) Q. Q 3 MILE RADIUS C- Co Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY u DRAWN BY: RMJ REVISION: SCALE: t" Imi Turrell, Hall & Associates, IncCREATED 10-01-25 WA FILE PATH: Marine& Environmental(onsulting GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH STREET RPUD JOB NO. 25053 NA PVSOSJUI°znlT sa 34R4 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL34104-3732 BEAR RELATED CALL MAP SHEET: 01 OF01 N;A 25033 BFARS CALL. til:twtaiehluutaples.cotn Ph°ne:(239)643-0166 Fax(239)643-6632 SECTION-29 TOWNSHIP-49S RANGE-2( Page 288 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 289 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST,, RPUD BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2025 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL cot ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 (239)643-0166 Page 290 of 745 GG PKWY/601" Sr RPUD BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2025 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report provides project management guidelines for the avoidance of adverse interactions with Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) on the Golden Gate Parkway/601h Street RPUD residential development project. This document addresses the black bears' background information along with their ecological and biological characteristics and habitat requirements. A description of how planning and site development has been guided in consideration of bears is given within the management plan. The plan briefly describes activities that will be undertaken or avoided to prevent encouraging black bears from entering into the project site. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Golden Gate Parkway/601h Street RPUD project site is located in western Collier County, between 62nd St SW and 601h St SW in Naples, Florida. The property is located within Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Access to the project is via Golden Gate Parkway and 60'h Street SW. The project is currently undeveloped forested land. 62"d Street SW runs through the property at its northern boundary. It is surrounded by other development with residential buildings to the west and south, a church to the east, and Golden Gate Parkway to the north. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS: HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS The project area is around 4.18 acres, all of which is proposed to be impacted or further isolated by the proposed development. The site is composed primarily of upland pine flatwood forest with small components of cleared open land and paved roadway. The project will meet the Collier County preservation requirements through a contribution to Conservation Collier for purchase of off -site lands. This is a viable alternative as the on -site preserve requirement is less than '/2 acre. 4.0 FLORIDA BLACK BEAR The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) has reports of numerous Florida black bear sightings in this area. The FWC database shows 219 calls within 3 miles of the project site between 2019 and 2024. No evidence of black bear utilization (tracks, scrapes, scat, etc.) of the site has been documented as a result of the listed species survey efforts, but due to the presence in the vicinity that has been documented by FWC, appropriate measures must be taken to avoid Page 291 of 745 GG PKWY/601" ST RPUD BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2025 future conflicts between bears and residents of the development. The habitat on site is not enough to support a bear but could provide forage and cover to an animal moving through the area. 4.1 Biology The Florida black bear was listed as a Threatened species by Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (currently known as the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) in 1974. It was delisted in 2012 due to strong population numbers resulting from the protection and conservation measures which had been put in place. The Florida black bear is typically the smallest subspecies of the American black bear. The Florida black bear is the largest land mammal in Florida. The average weights of females and males are 82 kg and 113 kg respectively. Like all members of the bear family, black bears are large, powerful mammals with rounded ears, short tails, 5-toed feet, and large canine teeth. The species has black hair over the entire body with the occasional exceptions of a brown muzzle and a blonde chest patch. Florida black bears utilize a wide variety of vegetative communities. Important habitat types include pine flatwoods, hardwood swamp, cypress swamp, cabbage palm forest, sand pine scrub and mixed hardwood hammock. A combination of these communities is critical for food supply due to the seasonal changes of habitat use coupled with food response and availability. Bears follow a diet pattern linked to food availability with intense seasonal influence. They shift from herbaceous matter in early spring, to soft fruits in summer, to hard mast during fall. Important staples include saw palmetto fruits and hearts, the fruits of swamp tupelo, oaks, blueberry and gallberry make up approximately 80% of the bear's diet. Insects, most importantly honeybees, yellow jackets, and carpenter ants are regularly included in a normal diet. Small vertebrates taken occasionally consist of rabbit, armadillo, and raccoon while infrequently wild hog and white-tailed deer may also be taken. The breeding season for black bears runs from June to July, but cubs are not born until late January to early February; a total gestation period of about 7 months (215 days). Bears have delayed implantation, which halts fetal development at a very early stage until late November or early December, actual developmental gestation is only 6-8 weeks. Litters can contain from 2 to 4 cubs. Cubs separate from their mother when they are approximately 16-17 months old. Due to the size of its large home range, low population density and slow reproduction rate, the Florida black bear is sensitive to excessive mortality. The main threat to population stability is habitat loss. Expanding urbanization, agricultural development, and increasing use of the state's Page 292 of 745 GG PKWY/60T" ST RPUD BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER2025 wild lands for recreation all have resulted in an accelerated rate of habitat loss. 4.2 Site Development Considerations and Species Management Protocol The open spaces which will be created within the project are too small (both individually and together) to support black bears and it is not expected that bears would enter or utilize the project area following development. The concern is that certain human activities within the project could lure bears into the property and result in adverse interactions with residents. The FWC has promoted a Bear Awareness campaign for several years. They have made available various informative brochures including a homeowner's guide (Guide to Living in Bear Country) that outline steps that can be taken to avoid impacting bears or attracting them into the property. FWC's outlined protocol for landowners will be followed. A few of the listed items include: • Properly storing garbage in lidded cans or bear resistant dumpsters • Trash kept inside a fenced and gated area. • Trash put out for collection the morning of collection rather than the night before. • No food to be kept outside • If grills are available, clean and store them in secure areas immediately after use. Page 293 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Page 294 of 745 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Golden Gate Parkway/60" Street RPUD flkla Project Gateway August 12, 2025 Revised December 3, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27B30 IJMB PROJECT NO. 2SO61 3) Page 295 of 745 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 5 Scope of Project 6 Table A - Proposed Land Use 6 Figure 1 - Location Map 6.1 Master Concept Plan 6.2 Project Generated Traffic 7 Table B - Site -Generated Trips 7 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 7.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 8 Project Traffic Distribution 8 Area of Significant Impact 8 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 8.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 8.2 2024 thru 2028 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2024 & 2028 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2028 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 Appendix 10 Page 296 of 745 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that Golden Gate Parkway/601" Street RPUD (f/k/a Project Gateway) will not significantly or negatively impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted levels of services. It was determined that the site -generated traffic associated with the proposed 36 townhomes will have less than a 2% impact on the adjacent road network. In fact, the project will have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1% impact on any road's adopted capacity standard). It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of impact, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed multi- family development. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. It is noted that per Collier County's 2024 AUIR, the current traffic demand on the segment of Golden Gate Parkway (between Livingston Road and 1-75) slightly exceeds the adopted level of service capacity. More specifically, Golden Gate Parkway - Link 20.2 is operating at a v/c ratio = 100.8%. This segment of Golden Gate Parkway is not within the project's area of impact and is not significantly or negatively impacted by the proposed project. In fact, the project's impact is 0.14% of the road's capacity which is insignificant and defined as de minimis. It is also noted that Collier County Government has initiated a corridor study for Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of identifying operational improvements that could be completed to improve traffic flow and safety measures as well as increase capacity along the subject corridor. Although this .project does not significantly impact the specific link of concern, the Applicant welcomes any and all improvements that will improve capacity, safety and traffic flow. Site Access Conditions The project proposes having one (1) full access on 60a' Street SW. The site access design will be finalized at the time of acquiring final development approval. East Central TCMA The project is located within the East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), and subject to Policy 5.1 thru 5.3 and 5.6 thru 5.8 of the Growth Management Plan. The Applicant has satisfied these policies as discussed below. Policy 5.1: The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would Page 297 of 745 directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current A UIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year A UIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (R)Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. Project Status — Satisfied The project does not significantly impact or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. The project will have a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1% impact) on the adjacent road network. Policy 5.2: Project traffic that is 1 % or less of the adopted peak hour service volume represents a de minimis impact. Authorization of development with a de minimis impact shall be pursuant to Section 163.3180(6), Florida Statutes. Project Status — Satisfied The project has a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1% impact) on the adjacent road network, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.3: In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved projects must go through a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.B.7, of the Land Development Code. Project Status — Satisfied The Applicant is not requesting vesting. No further action is required to address this specific policy. Policy 5.6 In order to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at 3 Page 298 of 745 least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Project Status — Satisfied The project does not significantly impact or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. The project will have a de minimis impact (i.e., less than 1 % impact) on the adjacent road network. The Applicant is not requesting to be exempt from link -specific concurrency, and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.7 Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A and 1.5.B of the Capital Improvement Element. If any Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for a proposed development indicates that fewer than 85% of the lane miles in a TCMA are achieving the LOS standards indicated above, the proposed development shall not be permitted where such condition occurs unless modification of the development is made sufficient to maintain the LOS standard for the TCMA, or the facilities required to maintain the TCMA LOS standard are committed utilizing the standards for committed improvements in Policy 5.3 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Plan. Project Status - Satisfied As established by Collier County's 2024 AUK the East Central TCMA has 85% of its north/south and east/west lane miles operating at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1.5.A. and 1.5.B. of the GMP. No further action is required to address this policy. Policy 5.8 Should the TISfor a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1 % of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: (VI)(LX)a. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Section 163.3180(5)(h), Florida Statutes. The facility cost for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as 4 Page 299 of 745 determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding lanes to a similar area/facility type as the constrained facility. (VI)b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segment(s) and/or to enhance mass transit or other non -automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district. (VI)c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. (VI)(Md. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard oj' any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR-7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. Project Status - Satisfied The project will not directly access a hurricane evacuation route that is operating below its adopted level of service. Furthermore, the project will not significantly or negatively impact a road that operates below its adopted level of service. In fact, the proposed land use will have a de minimis impact on the adjacent road network (i.e., less than a 1 % impact on any road's adopted capacity standard), and therefore, no further action is required to address this policy. Methodology On July 23, 2025, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. The TIS methodology was reviewed by staff and a copy of the approved methodology is provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). Subsequent to the acceptance of the Traffic Impact Statement Methodology, the Traffic Impact Statement incorporated the following changes: 1. The Traffic Impact Statement was based upon the recently published ITE Trip Generation Manual 12a' Edition vs. the I Vh Edition. Page 300 of 745 Scope of Project Golden Gate Parkway/60'' Street RPUD (DWa Project Gateway) is a proposed residential development that will consist of 36 townhomes. The property is located on the southwest corner of 60t' Street SW and Golden Gate Parkway, within Collier County, Florida. The project proposes having one (1) full access on 60' Street SW. The site access design will be finalized at the time of acquiring final development approval. It is expected that the project will be completed by the year 2028. Table A Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Size Multi -Family 36 Dwelling Units R Page 301 of 745 I I I I I I 0 00 c. r I0 a I Poinciana School Dr Golden Gate Parkway r_ O� � Lonqboat Drive t, ,per Way Mercantile Avenue rigger Lane v a Progress 0 O ue ° seshoe Dr N. 'v p0oo 0 Domestic 9Y nue m seshoe Dr S. - 0 � m Ente rise Ave Enterprise nue i m Na Airport Exchange Av nue E 0 U Propspect Ave c c Noples Airo port North aJ1■L7TRANSP(3RTATI0N ENL3INEERINIS, INC. Project Gateway J Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Road c 0 I Y I o I J 0 NORTH 00 N.T.S. n _a I r 3 �, o n� 5 0 v a of mI c >' N I J I I I inN 3.1 V) in N (A N N I L L 'O CDL tLo th n i0 tU fa Golden Gate Parkway 2nd St SW N I � N y N y I s N 115 I _r- I I Devonshire Blvd �Radio Road Radio Road _______________________ I Road LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 6-LANE ARTERIAL July 23, 2025 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR ----- 2-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD — Project Location & FIGURE 1 Roadway Classification Co. t Page 302 of 745 LAND USESLWARY DESCRFnM AC % R61DENMAL 3.15 75.36% IOTALPiIY 4.18 100% OPENSPACESATAARV* tMlAFED(409/4 PFCMD®(40%) 1.67 1.67 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (100' ROW) 62ND ST. SW (60' ROW) PROPERTY , BOUNDARY *FINAL CALCULATION FOR THE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF SDP. **SEE DEVIATION #1 DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT: a. EX. NATIVE VEGETATION = 3.68 AC. b. MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED (10%) = 0.37 AC c. PRESERVE REQUIREMENT SHALL BE FULFILLED OFFSIT 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY IS 36 MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BOUNDARY 10, TYPE "D" DRY DETENTION 0.23 AC 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT F.1) FINAL ACCESS LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF PLAT OR SDP �IDETENTION 0.08 AC ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE o COMMUNITY FACILITY 0 30' v = RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER \-PROPERTY (SEE EXHIBIT F, COMMITMENT F.1) BOUNDARY ZONING: ESTATES CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL 10, TYPE "D" BUFFER BOUNDARY GRAPHIC SCALE Usp , so , (M FEET) SCALE: V = 30' EXHIBIT G GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/ "`�'"" Bowman a",,, �•� __ 60TH ST. RPUDPLM MASTER PLAN Page 303 of 745 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 12t' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use code Multi - Family (LUC 220) was most appropriate for estimating the anticipated site -generated trips. It is noted that ITE's trip rates/equations are based upon 50 to 60 surveys having an average survey sample size of about 215 dwelling units. The ITE equation for the AM and PM peak hours include a constant value of (+) 12.93 and (+) 7.35 trips, respectively. When weighted over the sample size of 215 dwelling units yields a constant value of 0.060 trips/unit and 0.034 trips/unit vs. weighted over a 36 units which yields 0.36 and 0.20 trips/unit. Therefore, it is concluded that using the equation vs. the "averaged" trip rate overstates the volume of site generated trips by a factor of about 6.0 per unit for each of the 36 units. As indicated by the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, the use of the equations vs. average rates should be determined based upon the number of studies and the sample size as it is applicable to the size of the project. As determined, the project will generate 15 vph and 19 new two-way trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Net New Trins Generated Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips (vph) (vph) ADT Multi -Family 224 15 19 (36 d. u. 's) The report concludes that the project will generate fewer than 50 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "fewer than 50 trips", which is define as a small-scale study. 7 Page 304 of 745 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Golden Gate Parkway/60th Street RPUD Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 36 Units Land Use Trip Generation Equation Code Trip Period (Based upon S.F.) Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Pa+ly T-Fa€fi`' r� DT) - T - C 63(X) +1 29 n C - 924 ADT Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.21(X) = 224 ADT AM Peak How (Yph) _ i-n35(X)i17 93- 246 Vph 6 19 24% Enter/ 76% Cvit - AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.41(X) = 15 vph 4 / 11 vph 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = RM Peak How (Yph) _ T-n48(v)+73r- 24"h 444 62% Enter/ 240E Exit - PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.52(X) = 19 vph 12 / 7 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = -7.1 Page 305 of 745 Existing + Committed Road Network Table 2 provides a detail of the surrounding E + C road network and their respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. The principal road that will provide access to the site is Golden Gate Parkway. Golden Gate Parkway varies between a four -lane to a six -lane divided urban arterial. The road functions as a primary east/west interconnect between its eastern terminus at Collier Boulevard and its western terminus at U.S. 41. Within proximity of the site, Golden Gate Parkway is six -lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. It is noted that Collier County Government has initiated a corridor study for Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of identifying operational improvements that could be completed to improve traffic flow and safety measures as well as increase capacity along the subject corridor. Although this project does not significantly impact the specific link of concern, the Applicant welcomes any and all improvements that will improve capacity, safety and traffic flow. Project Traffic Distribution The site -generated trips were distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, and the location of surrounding retail and office commercial and medical land use areas, and recreational attractions and location of school sites. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Table 2 also depicts the project traffic by directional volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the project's area of impact are shown in Table 2. 8 Page 306 of 745 Poinciana School Dr i Livingston woods Ln ramer ' Pine Ridge Road I I r I I ' 8 NORN.TTH a o. ' t I 3 �I S 0 ! c 0 Co 0 +' c I J I e m I OIY cl 1 I 3 3 3 3 ( in in in in 0 N r L ' 2� 5%- ' r? W W to Golden Gate Parkway OMMOMM" Lonaboat Drive ■ Horseshoe Dr S. t✓ O G 1 Mercantile Avenue Progress Ajnue 7 o genue v Domestic W 7 o m _ l AVe Enterprise enue — Na Airport Exchange Av Propspect Ave l ii No o Naples Airport c c ■ 0 JMTRAN5PORTATI0N ENE3INEERINE3, ING. Project Gateway 45% 6�► 4f-- % 15i IGolden ate Pa way 2nd St SW '- Cn o o i 115 i -r- I Devonshire Blvd I ' /l Radio Road Radio Road � _ — __ -- `I Road LEGEND 00% Project Traffic Distribution Project -Generated I FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution July 23, 2025 ME Page 307 of 745 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) _ Golden Gate Pkwy EC-TCMA 20.2 EC-TCMA 21.a EC-TCMA 21.b N EC-TCMA 22.0 Santa Barbara Blvd 76.0 EC-TCMA 77.0 Livingston to 175 1-75 to 60th St SW 60th St SW to Santa Barbara Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 12 Entering 7 Exiting Road Class 6D 6D 6D 4D 4D 6D TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT LOS Service PK Dir. PK Direction Project Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic LOS yj_ phpd) % Dist. E 3550 45.0% E 3300 60.0% E 3300 40.0% D 1980 15.0% D 2100 5% E 3100 20% Project Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant v( phpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 5 E 3 w 2% 0.14% NO 7 E 4 w 2% 0.21% NO 5 w 3 E 2% 0.15% NO 2 w 1 E 2% 0.10% NO 1 S 0 N 2% 0.05% NO 2 N 1 S 2% 0.06% NO Page 308 of 745 2024 thru 2028 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2024 thru 2028 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were derived from the 2024 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2028 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2024 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2028 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2028 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2024 thru 2028 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. Page 309 of 745 Golden Gate Pkwy TABLE 3 2024 & 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2028 2028 Peak Hour 2024 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v( phpd) DiR AUIR (vphpo) (vphyd) vphPd) 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 21,b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 E 2,00% 2544 10 2360 Page 310 of 745 Golden Gate Pkwy 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara TABLE 4 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2028 2028 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk v h d LOS v( phpd) Dir LOS v h d Dir (Vph) Dir 2350 C 2544 E C 7 E W 2350 C 2544 E C 5 W 3 E 2028 Build -Out Serv. Vol. Peak Hour Pk Hr PK Dir PK Dir v( phpd (v h d 2548 3300 2549 3300 2028 2028 Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction PK Direction v/c Ratio LOS 0.77 C 0.77 C Page 311 of 745 Support Documents APPENDIX 10 Page 312 of 745 JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHDOLOGY Project Gateway (Collier County, Florida) July 23, 2025 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Small -Scale) Review Fee =$0.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENmNEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27B30 WM6 "m Oa EUT NO. 0SO61 3) Mt Page 313 of 745 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:7-23-2025 Time: Location: Collier Countv Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive People AttendinE: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) Study Preparer• Preparer's Name and Title: James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering,_Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 (239)-919- 2767 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Project Gateway Location: Southwest corner of 62°a and 60'' St SW Land Use Type: Multi -Family ITE Code #: LUC 220 Proposed number of development units: 36 multi -family dwelling units Other: Description: Zoning: Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached hnpslld dace.live.neb8481204edbdac2cblDesktoplPmjecW250613 Project GatewayNelhodologyRepod doc NI? Page 314 of 745 Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier Coupty s 5-year CIP. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment (See Table 2) Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is greater. https//d.docs. ive.neV8481204odbdac7cbDesktopIProjects250613 Project Gateway/MelhodalogyRepaddor. UW Page 315 of 745 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee X Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant h1psVd.docs.tve.neU8481204edbdac2cbY0asktoyProocls250613 Project GatawayAdathodofogyRWrtdoc M4 Page 316 of 745 It ' 0 E1 al Poinciona School Dr Golden Gate Parkway Longboat Drive Clipper Way Mercantile Avenue Outrigger Lane v c Progress Ajeriue W Horseshoe Dr N. 7572 0 & 0 > Domestic nue 0 Horseshoe Dr S. c � m Enterprise Ave Enterprise -9 enue — Z_N204Airport I txcnan a Av Propspect Ave l TiI 0 Naples Airport c c 00 i J Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Rood v a I I � I C I I NORTH 0 0 N.T.S. a a i >I 5 0 v o 0 I v 0 o al rn ml c_ >I 0 J N V c I in En (f) C O 00 (0 n 0 (D 10 Golden Gate Parkway 2nd St SW ` N ch Co _1 I r I I I Devonshire Ivzdf Radio Road Radio Road _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ I North Road JMTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 6-LANE ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR 2-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD - Project Gateway Project Location & FIGURE 1 J July 23, 2025 Roadway Classification MS Page 317 of 745 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Proiect Gateway Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Scheduie 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 36 Units Land Use Trip Generation Equation Code Trip Period (Based upon S.F.) Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daity- - T - 6.41(X) 4- 75.31 - 306 ADT Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 6.74(X) = 243 ADT _ T—n31(v)4»Qr— 34 Wh g/2-6 24% Enter/ 76% Exit = AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.40(X) = 14 vph 3 / 11 vph 24% Enter/ 76`Yo Exit = PM Peak How (Yph) - T-nn3(X)+2n55- 36"^h 2-3 ,3 vPTT ph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.51(X) = 18 vph 11 / 7 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = m� Page 318 of 745 Poinciana chool It Or i Livingston Woods Ln Kramer ' Pine Ridge Road v 0 0 o I Y I C I NORTH a N.T. 0 S. ' a a_ Ir 3 �I o � F_ c 0 o ° JI al m o) IN_ V) 0 6i LZ I2!_ % b, I rn (0 W to Golden Gate Parkway OMEN=% Lonaboat Drive I Mercantile Avenue one T o Progress Ajen ue ° Or N. ° 'E 0 0 Domestic 94 nue > Or S. - 0 ntemrise Ave I Enterprise i anue — Na Airport I txcnange Avenue - 0 U Propspect Ave ITT c Naples Airport o North i 1 a MTRANSP(3RTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 45% 6t60% 4♦ 0 %6. 15% Golden 3ate Parkway 2nd St SW 0 �I 3 �I N N O 115 I _r_ I I Devonshire Blvd -� Radio Road Radio Road — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Road ' Project Gateway July 23, 2025 LEGEND 007l, Project Traffic Distribution Project -Generated I FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution M-7 Page 319 of 745 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) _ Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) _ Golden Gate Pkwy EC-TCMA 20.2 EC-TCMA 21.a EC-TCMA 21.b EC-TCMA 22.0 Livingston to 175 1-75 to 60th St SW 60th St SW to Santa Barbara Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd Santa Barbara Blvd 76.0 Green to Golden Gate Pkwy EC-TCMA 77.0 Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 11 Entering 7 Exiting LOS Service PK Dir. PK Direction Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic Class LOS v h d % Dist. 6D E 3550 45.0% 6D E 3300 60.0% 6D E 3300 40.0% 4D D 1980 15.0% 4D D 2100 5% 6D E 3100 20% Project Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant v h d Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 5 E 3 w 2% 0.11 % NO 7 E 4 W 2% 0.12% NO 4 w 3 E 2% 0.21% NO 2 w 1 E 2% 0.10% NO 1 S 0 N 2% 0.03% NO 2 N 1 S 2% 0.06% NO Page 320 of 745 Golden Gate Pkwy TABLE 3 2024 & 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2028 2028 Peak Hour 2024 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips v h d DiR AUIR v( phpol v( phpd) vL�1 21.a 1-75 to 60th St SW 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 E 2.00% 2544 10 2360 Page 321 of 745 TABLE 4 2028 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2024 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Plet Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v( phpd) LOS v h d Dir LOS v( phpd) Dir v h Dir v( phpd) v( phpd) vlc Ratio LOS Golden Gate Pkwy 21.a i-75 to 60th St SW 2350 C 2544 E C 7 E 4. W 2548 3300 0.77 C 21.b 60th St SW to Santa Barbara 2350 C 2544 E C 4 W 3 E 2551 3300 0.77 C d Page 322 of 745 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) SCHOOL IMPACT ANALYSIS APPLICATION Page 323 of 745 q�$trict Schoo1� �71*Collier Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [q] type of application request (one only): .7, School Capacity Review Exemption Letter F-�Concurrency Determination [] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: PROJECT GATEWAY RPUD I. Project Information: Municipality: COLLIFRCOUNTY Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 36,6412110),`. Location/Address of subject property: NAP -ES F 34116 (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: South of Go de Gate Parkway and east of 1 75 at the ale,. , ;.,. of Golden Gale Parkway and 601h Street SW. II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): CONTRACT PURCHASER: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST Aoent/Contacf Person. Agent. Ellen Summers, AICP. Bowman Contact: MICHAEL PUCHALLA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 3200 BAILEY LANE. SUITE 109, NAPLES, FL 34105 (Michael Puchallal Telephone#: 239 434 2397 Fax: N A Email MICHAEL@COLLIERHOUSING.COM 1 hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Ellen Summers AICP - - - - Owner or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information 8.1-2025 Date Project Data Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Residential Estates Proposed Land Use Designation: (Multi -family) Current Zoning: E-Estates (portion within CMO) Proposed Zoning: RPUD Project Acreage:AI, ' r Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 1 G Total Units Proposed by Type: 36 Is this a phasedproject: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date time stamp: Page 324 of 745 a�_sd i %� GoEd,n G !j5P.I VvrXryMjL. G��lil�n Gait; PAY .. - J f� subject site a �Y r .�- L A ^^lilo00���wj. *—'Vw- Av• r+t fly r " IL 1 R %-7. 1 1 ". " '_TadF:I■IFITWOIdrolia►'IF:Ii GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/60TH ST. RPUD (PL-20250006068) SURVEY Page 326 of 745 nA) evov i � �• � • d _ •�� sd5• dODr� wNt _ —.tr — _� 1��yyp oNA—'' 4___��_ c a44', 5. • v0 '' ���x oseio alvl o e ^^"M0O Ily�eb»�^(N—�3 � ao wlvl y' a' 4 •el • •�•• fig- 9y as; AIWTWOi / IMtT99 Aq .wsp�io�d5a J eu �e•m�sww mr w.�e •on roaaim o9e`o. et s•,•L +:../p O e a y. 4 AWR110N09 R: iRACTe9 $: o 16 ub isor-o's _ _ —_ _ �i _ _— a yOo_ �—�_, „• _ __—__.,,� __ _ __ , 5 o»�rr[wa 44.--+;:� �`e••-. Jut u � "..—_�� I� 4` m¢ ar MYM y0 4 i s �W�sw rp5iw 1 4 ,` !,•�{�,e� 0'[M f O' 4��J •—w.�e-u -- 9—q u�---•J o 5 i •. 4 •z �roN� ow[ 4 4 4 4 moom it Om�mcmmZ== ��® a � v wawa um r • � ®O.o r v uoa. pa m.emr.vu awry � B �++ �eo0a rd �.au ❑.mart ❑?en ue o I,®. SCALE' " 30' gosari w 1��0/ +r'�'• PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 0[a raw.aro mu rnae.onl •e.4 SCHEDULE &II EXCEPTIONS O•KM as � � ]I soD rt �u0 r a NrrWn x[M[a �x•�aow. iuwe r � rtstrt[nurs LICtp� er �rs tvat[r /em. Otr. cc� nwa awn a wrvwc .w vow r[rt[w. � wrzcrs .veto wvwic¢ �•us noi'Tr •, I� va 101 � �e io w Ivl e nmr q rac o� roi0as aonfslm �rs aetcr a•wr[ Btwa, x rneC ror I I Ia xtia, ro ,w) o[scoxM �'� R0`O�' I� ..mars ewcr x wrvt wr vcw x •[a.n rer[ers � f1f[P.�L.[l1 amewE >s m ( �54 n i IruS�.eo �� [a�uRSa ww¢atxr. wrv�,ee[w% �ES v'��Y q 9!! ybg na"'m. rdt5 ror .rrrcr set[' �r�rcw)�r naui ro se.w Q� 3 [a�LIY s[atc d* . .o. •...rteie °nac rtoam5 p i S n®x��9 sxa+ S` � ! � (n ■ u uc•[ a5cxsrtw raatm x waves+. v �wlnov s .M 0 0 NOTES N rc. wpm 9sre• rtrd� ro s[ .rn eowm+e. w n sao .v,. x, $yR emu �•iwuo[mn1en1 od1ma0 R g , wmrsrovw:v wvmom m e .wwe n+w • wwvimrv� n �[� waa0s�'oR w�� OY[ rtorsro OnLw� wn Iw.O rox M n< rddv[ rv� a� . wrm xA/• =-n4 dr�nK t,.Mlr m[ pl CERTIFIED TO: nm +e[t . �.aaor n< nnn.ow .a <awnm w uu m %Q Wes�MownS m ME Page 327 of 745 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petition of the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirements of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may no be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petition or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s). NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ELLEN SUMMERS, AICP, SENIOR MANAGER, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERTY NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBERS PL-20250006066 & PL- 20250006068. {XJUL �lJ�""� — Bowman SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT 950 Encore Way STREET OR P.O. BOX Ellen Summers, AICP, Sr. Manager, Planning & Development Naples, FL 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 11 th day of March 2026, by means of X physical presence or online notarization, by Ellen Summers, AICP, Senior Manager, Planning and Development, o is pe own o m or who has produced as identification and who did/did no a e an oath. °SiJY ► "'••. DEBORAH K D'ANGOLA _°• Notary Public - State of Florida o` Commission # HH 741848 Signature of Notary Public A My Comm. Expires Jan 23, 2030 Bonded throw h National Notary Assn. Printed Name of Notary Public (Stamp with serial number) Page 328 of 745 :i ■ rea :1:1 N 10[clo► [• JiM - ,. � - i _.. t". -. ,•y �.�� - --.•ri' r � i - -' - .:,..mow - rr . .i t • „ -tit, -�•� -� - — - _ - , . - - _ .�.,z ' �;.. .� .,,� -r, . :'- - . I ���/�� r. .� .Y. - aS - �;`� - � .5 '-• �; � .� _ �^� �'�'�' �,a. � ems.. J.•� �C _ r�`• - Yr _-. VFW✓.. �^ a�� P " F _". _ •"�' ' _ y £ fAaaY�iL—].r., _ a +*'y�,y, � as `./ r'•.r� y� r Y ` t* '` 4 � .f. _ `Y� \. �". ,`� �'�c'� �i la ca� y ��:=i ` \tea l • - _' •�' 1-L'1.,, i-� •�� �. J` y' - `Y• I __ k > .y i I - l.C+� _ Ffi�' .$ �.�"��✓' - . ! � . � .' .. , tit , it""�".' .1. - 'l,• +r r` " qCollierCenter, 3299 Tamiami Trail East. Naples, FL 34112 Kathryn Grigsby, Planner 111: 239-252-2971 _ ,j ...,✓ '. � t fib. _ � y+.- ;�Y',; r _*y- ,ems 1 +" f . ,y�. .�1.,,. �� �,,� `! � i I. � %�. ..,. ti}, •�� ._ •. r ' / �'� � r" iX,M +.,"�� ! !.� ''I'+t€��� �p� _ dam.' .# s � . " • V. � r, � -.t 'g f' - a Y. { r�F�w.. i � "-��� �� t �. � F t f. r• �` w~ - r �' . f- ..,` Y �„ 4j 6�" 1.7 L NvN 1` GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY160TH ST RESIDENTIAL 'PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SUBDISTRICT SMALL SCALEt a` ._ GROWTHBoard of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center, Third Floor 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Kathryn Grigsby, Planner 111: 239-252-2971 Ivi may. I , 1. i _ fie- f " T� . // _ �•f �/�,G/{ I + S j ..� y �".�%�'! r a_ 4 ���+����r 1 ; `` ji � � '^Fh .^JJ I C �.+ '.1.- - . s.��,_J •A -yy�'y Gam.+ -a.;: 1.P '�.'.� * h Y+' - _y`-. 'Y` _ � 'Y',t`f-' - .�� 4 y%��}�'.. [�k/h�-�' �.:5�, h�• i�• � t �� �a�'���""!'� e. � !a�,.'�f� *�>� � � iC� '�'�7_� �.,r ' u ,�.,��.�,y, � � _ „ �+,� =f :y' k ` a' \� � ���-� � � k/ "��� •ri`'� 1�.. F� �4 �i.9�/' - , �.3 ` y .. 4 f _"� �.' � - /'M1 � M,' �.�ti'^ `^ � I .Ft � � �.� ��� `��—�- �-�! P�, r--�� i+:k i � % s- r✓ t c-'}�''���•� trrM " ..��' �.. �,`}7�.�ti % "'� --,` ��P E � t�.�� >y � � ~"e 'p�ti�..r � . r� � } n, �, v _ �.; .���.�. � ' � 'F{,.�•i '\ y`,� +J�. } �.,..-. max' Ya � .� �1' "`��iF � _"'%` -.. ::ir. l• t+[ .F '�} _..fr ..-•—�,�id.-:'� - �C/ tk=�r'. � \°'�C�=�` $t,sr _ ,�3e�'�`I,: �'�5=i�ii.•rti.:�i���., ,ff '�C 4/2/2026 Item # 9.0 ID# 2026-773 PL202060002040 - EX - 3959 City Gate Blvd N - Collier County requests approval from the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Environmental Advisory Council, of a commercial excavation permit, for property located in the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development at 3959 City Gate Blvd N in Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (PL20260002040) [Coordinator: Jaime Cook, Director, Development Review Division] ATTACHMENTS: 1. PL20260002040 Resource Recovery Park EX Staff Report 2. Site Location Map 3. Civil Plans 4. Haul Routes 5. Environmental Data 6. Transportation Impact Statement 7. Excavation Permit Approval Letter 8. Excavation Annual Renewal Letter Page 332 of 745 Collier County Development Review STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) ACTING AS ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: April 2, 2026 SUBJECT: PETITION EX-PL20260002040: COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner / Applicant: Collier County 3335 Tamiami Trail E #101 Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Gabriella DeLuca Rycon Construction 112515 Metro Parkway #2 Fort Myers, FL 33966 The applicant is requesting approval of a Commercial Excavation Permit to allow for the off -site hauling of 77,000 cubic yards of excess fill from the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 3959 City Gate Blvd N in Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, within the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District (RMFU) North Belle Meade (NBMO) Sending Lands in the Future Land Use Element. The property is zoned Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development. (See location map on the following page) Page 333 of 745 PURPOSE / DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant wishes to haul excess fill from an approved site development project (SDP-PL20230002379) off -site. Pursuant to Section 22-110 (b)(2) of the Collier County Code of Laws, applications for commercial excavation permits shall be reviewed by the Environmental Advisory Council for recommendation and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 17th AVE SW 9th AVE SW un ;c 21st AVE SW �+�- �n cc i�G.l l� l4 I I I bb_ 3 AVE SW ��? G A N PROJECT E th AVE SW Brantley BLV �d LOCATION � Guevara 7th AVE SW Jenkins AV . AY Kearney ne 29th AVE SW � AVE AVE IvisaAly 31st AVE SW � saAVE C4# ate BL 1 � __Ever! VE cat cater _ v r take LVI] U HL a a� a � GG � Location Map Iliil�iilli == �i■osi■ise■i■■�i■ e1ME eee�eel �=� �®� 1111,11 111I111PIE II��i1�1�1��1 All ■E��i��el 0 a44ee'I - . e■ � � D FITY GATEIN IIIIdI ��elll eeeee� � - . __• .biz *. �tri. .r Petition Number: 20260002040 Zoning Map Page 334 of 745 SURROUNDING LANE USE AND ZONING: The properties surrounding the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPUD are zoned as follows: North: Agriculture, within the RFMU-NBMO-Sending Lands (consisting of the Hideout Golf Club, Jenkins Way Right -of -Way, and a single-family residence). East: Agriculture, within the RFMU-NBMO-Sending Lands (consisting of a mix of vacant lots and single-family dwellings. South: Agriculture, within the RFMU-NBMO-Sending Lands (consisting of the Collier County Landfill) and the City Gate Planned Unit Development (consisting of the Paradise Coast Sports Complex and a variety of commercial uses). West: Canal and then Estates (consisting of a mix of vacant lots and single-family dwellings). A haul route is attached, showing the primary ingress and egress off City Gate Blvd N. The closest residential structure from the excavation is approximately 700 feet northeast of the lake excavation. Site Plan Exhibit provided by Stantec Engineering Page 335 of 745 HISTORY AND PERMITS: This project is within the Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development. The Site Development Plan (SDP; PL20230002379) was approved on June 10, 2024, and the Development Excavation Permit (EX; PL20240001696) was approved on July 22, 2024. The original EX permit was intended to provide fill for the construction of the Collier County Sheriff's Office Forensics Buildings and stormwater management for the site. However, the fill generated by the excavation of the lake exceeded the site's needs, and the contractor is requesting to haul the fill off -site. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: This project has been found to be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP, including specifically the three elements analyzed below: 1) FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE)The subject property is consistent with the FLUE. The subject property is designated RFMU-NBMO-Sending Lands within the Future Land Use Element and on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) in the GMP. The property is zoned "Resource Recovery Business Park Industrial Planned Unit Development (IPUD). Ordinance 17-01 allows Administration Buildings and Equipment Maintenance Buildings as Permitted Uses within the IPUD. The lake provides on -site stormwater retention and treatment for the development, in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code and South Florida Water Management District regulations. 2) TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the proposed Commercial Excavation and has approved the project. The trips associated with this project are considered temporary in nature and are expected to cease with the completion of the excavation activities. Twelve (12) pm peak hour, two-way trips are expected to be generated as a result of the hauling activities. 3) CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME): Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition and has approved the project. The excavation activities will not affect the environmental policies within the CCME. The County has already recorded the Conservation Easements for the entirety of the IPUD. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based. Section 22-110(b)(2) of hte Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances specifies the requirements for the Commercial Excavation Permit. The specific criteria are as follows: Page 336 of 745 A. The excavation will not interfere with the natural function of any sanitary, storm or drainage system, or natural flow way, whether public or private, so as to create flooding or public health hazards or jeopardize the functions of the natural resources and environment of Collier County. Staff Comment: Staff has reviewed the Excavation Permit and has verified that this excavation will not interfere with the natural function of any sanitary, storm or drainage system, or natural flow way, whether public or private, so as to create flooding or public health hazards or jeopardize the functions of the natural resources and environment of Collier County. B. Dust or noise generated by the excavation will not cause a violation of any applicable provisions of this article. Rock crushing operations or material stockpiles that will be adjacent to any existing residential area may require separate county approval. It is anticipated that these activities will not occur during this operation. Staff Comment: There are twenty-three (23) property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary. An attached aerial depicts the location. Pursuant to Section 22-110 (c) of the Code of Laws and Ordinance, letters have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site advising them of this petition and the EAC and BCC meeting dates. Additionally, signs will be posted in the area providing notice of the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant has provided a Dust Control Plan within the Excavation Plans to provide reasonable assurances of dust control; noise is not anticipated to exceed levels allowed by the Code of Laws and Ordinances. C. The excavation will not adversely affect groundwater levels, water quality, hydro period, or surface water flow ways. The County Manager or designee may require the applicant to monitor the quality of the water in the excavation and adjacent ground and surface waters. Under no circumstances shall the excavation be conducted in such a manner as to violate Collier County or applicable State of Florida water quality standards. Staff Comment: Staff has determined that the excavation will not adversely affect groundwater levels, water quality, hydro -period or surface water flow ways. D. The excavation will be constructed so as to not cause an apparent safety hazard to persons or property. Staff Comment: Staff has determined the excavation follows OSHA guidelines and the County Code of Laws with respect to the excavation operation so as to not cause an apparent safety hazard to persons or property. E. The excavation does not conflict with the growth management plan or land development regulations adopted pursuant thereto, nor does it conflict with existing zoning regulations. Special criteria and approval procedures may be necessary for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. Page 337 of 745 Staff Comment: Staff has determined that the excavation does not conflict with the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code regulations. The project is not located within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. F. In cases where a wetland is no longer capable of performing environmental functions or pending environmental value or in cases where it is determined that no reasonable alternative exists other than disrupting a wetland, certain alterations may be allowed, except as otherwise authorized through previous county review processes. Staff Comment: The Environmental Data indicates the property for the proposed excavation consists entirely of upland habitat, with significant exotics present. Therefore, no wetlands will be impacted. G. Flow of water within and through preserved wetlands shall not be impeded. Staff Comment: There are no wetlands within the boundary of the proposed excavation. The required preserve, north and west of the project boundary, was recorded as a conservation easement to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in 2014 (OR 5066, Page 3442). H. Appropriate sediment control devices (hay bales, silt screens, etc.) shall be employed to prevent sedimentation within the wetland pursuant to the design requirements of Section 10.02.02 of the Land Development Code. Any building site adjacent to a wetland and elevated by filling, must employ the same erosion control devices. Fill must be stabilized using sod, seed, or mulch. Staff Comment: Staff has reviewed the Commercial Excavation Permit, and the plans indicate appropriate measures to prevent sedimentation and erosion control. This project has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Chapter 22, Article IV of the Code of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report EX-PL20260002040 on March 24, 2026. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) forward Petition PL20260002040 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval, including the excavation permit conditions. Attachments: Site Location Map Civil Plans Haul Routes Environmental Data Transportation Impact Statement Excavation Permit Approval Letter Excavation Permit Renewal Letter Page 338 of 745 17th AVE W A 19th AVE SW 21st AVE SW A -_ Cn 3rd AVE SW PROJECT Sth AVE SW Brantley BLVM4 LOCATION Guevara 27th AVE SW Jenkins 4 AVE AY Kearney Agr v' ne 29th AVE SW AVE AVE Ivisa A E 31st AVE SW a Iv sa AVE Markle AVE ~ it Gate BL EverlyAVE C ity Gate B VD PlOverATrE S White Lake BLVD_ Be k BLVD h+ti Location Map 11111d111111 UNION �r- CU X131 ■ILS PU"b" UNION �r- CU X131 ■ILS PU"b" U- CU- Zoning Map Petition Number: 20260002040 Page 339 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit lssuauce PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS EOP BACK OF CURS EDGE DE DRAIN MAI INTENA PUF LAKEPUBLIC UP CUE COUNTY UTI r ELEV NV AM1 CA' P7 NPOINT OFEVERTCAI NIC No G, W or ROW BASE LINE [CENTERLINE TL FLOW LINE R PROPERTY LINE opwiEmm SYMBOLS AIR RELEASE VALVE. COMPLETE IN —LINE GALE VALVE W/ BOX IN —LINE PLUG VALVE W/ BOX /y�1R FIRE HYDRANT, COMPLETE BLOW —OFF W/ BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT PIPE PLUG ECEN BACKFLOW PREVENTER/ABOVE GROUND METER t SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL PCLEAN ITT UMP STATION t STORM SEWER & STRUCTURE ® STRUCTURECONTROL PROPOSED ELEVATION ® PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATION 3 Exlsnrvc 'VA' IN EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATON b DIRECT ON or DRAINAGE FLOW ANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE NOTE: OPEN SYMBOLS AND DASHEDLINESOENDTE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - PL20140002416 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK PART OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 49, SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY OWNER: COLLIER COUNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E., SUITE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 J q "Hecz,Vz LOCATION MAP SITE MAP BUILDING INFORMATION Inc. N Dc. dz Inc. d] — _,s _R sae I— 1ns.O2T (3 Stantec 3510 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 200, NAPLES FL 34105 PHONE 239-649-4040 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION 427013 . www.stantec.00m PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN SET ISSUE DATE MAY 2024 ryO0%W.c —1 1. A DISTUJCE OF ]c4].&l 11 TO THE I, FOOF IE OF THE En 1/a OF s D SECII xcas oA OF TIE sOUMwFST t/a OF TIE xomnwEST 1/4m1FETHE SOOUStIMEST I/4 IF EAO D-ON 25 No —EST 1/9 OF THE NORIMhEST I/. OF THI —H.6I t/a o xm OF THE III*EST 1/9 OF FNTHE NOmxw I/> IFTA [E S01 THE otHWWEST t/a OF vuO SEC cOR sr I/a O En 1/a O ESTO /a O rvER OF THE NO_EST 1/9 OF INE NOHnIWEST51/a OFF THE SOVeTtTMis1 11 O� SeO SECS cOR IF THE T t/< OF THE rv1.4— t/a O EST I/a 11 SERIOxR21. ArvDRTA" OF _ FEET TO THE "'T I/a cOxrvEx OF I. 11 111 11 xGI OF 1HE wu 1— 1/ FOF THE ESOUM.— I/a OF_ANTHE E57 t/a OF DO SE�rn E ZRIH LIKE x THE THE H 1/2 a TH 1/2 O tH/RHO ORxER OF THE sdrtn St�/4MOM' HORtHSG5FF 1/a OF SaD ErnaxTM25TT Esr 1/2 a FiaT I/z cF ER OF THE FILIT T 1/a OF THE xF=,F I% IF THE F151a1/4 O LIKE F1 THEG I/a OF TIE EST I./,I OF LHE SOUIHEGst O1/a of ory SECTox12R5 NER OF THE usr 1/a OF LHE N.—.ENT 1/a OF THE soul _ 1/a I, TUO'_ x� WR T OF V,SF 1/4e OSN F O SECTIONE25ESTu+C n1pE OFE6 8 6IFISET FEit/a111E THE mUMrv'_1`T wsl OHNERt/a OFOF T1HHEE FisT 1/a OF LIE rvomnw t/a OF THE south— t/a OF MI 1-11 as: U5F I/a c£TIE XPTT. ST t/a OF VusF 1/4 OF�SAIOO E11." i5. AxDISTANCE OF 6F_ FE CORNER OF Fier t/6 OF THE rvOaMwFsi I/a OF lxE souM05i t/a OF uD sErnOn � 57 1/a OF THE NORIIMEST I/a OF THE usr O/O F THE OF TlErvoaMwx zs.00srATxE SouT�nFasO�i/a OF SUO sEtt OnO25:EH x t% aOF 9AE SEC 1 TIE5�n I.E IF OF11 IF THE x I/T 01 OF THE STHtc/2 OF lnE mOMvs I/a OF TIE N.FTnENFT t/a OF TII E IF THE OFOSUO SECTIOx TIE '11 11 11 I/a OF EASFOt/a O35 TMVST I�mINFaSFHE/a LINI OF SECiM ss� n osivaCEl[£ E01, FEET TO V,sF 1/a m S D SECTION 25 ktiF OF THE SOUTI-T I/a OF 1HE NORMFsST I/a OF T1 IF N III T t/a O ES t/a O 1/a DOrTsuO sEcnax. a FEET ro THE rv_Hx c EF OF THE wuMWT t/aTHE OF E sOutIF 'EX T t/a OF SNO I —ON 21. A 11 OF I]e5.99 FEET TO TIE I.T Or F CH Po% E. BROCK6EIER LUKE 8HlRMN pip% E. BROCKMEER PE, uCBMBE x 56BSB L8. x TdBJ PE, LJCEMBE x 5885D �ae�ockw=.w,,"Digitally signed oz-a2olsaoo2Tn jj5"'"'-ey s, by Chris °3 Brockmeier t Date: ,m...... 2024.05.23 MPS PROJECT NUMBER 12:10:47-04'00' 22701446701 mro•mb�a=•^•^°•^=m^^• ATE mates a BRJC FE19iFF n INDEX NUMBER Y2A0® 446701-03C-001CV PE. LICBN%E x 51 Page 340 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d924 INDEX TO SHEETS S„ E` DESCRIPTION 01 COVER SHEET 02 INDEX TO SHEETS 03 GENERAL NOTES 04 EXISTING CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION AND CLEARING PLAN O5 PERMITTING BOUNDARIES O6 ZONING DATA PLAN 07 JIMASTMER UTILITY SITE PLAN 08 MASTER PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 09 SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND GRADING PLAN — A 10 SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND GRADING PLAN — B 11 SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND GRADING PLAN — C 12 SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND GRADING PLAN — D 13 PLAN AND PROFILE — A 14 PLAN AND PROFILE — 8 15 PLAN AND PROFILE — C 16 TYPICAL SECTIONS 17 STRUCTURES TABLE 18 SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN 19 DRAINAGE DETAILS — A 20 DRAINAGE DETAILS — B 21 PAVING DETAILS — A 22 PAVING DETAILS — B 23 FENCING DETAILS — A 24 FENCING DETAILS — B 25 GENERAL DETAILS 26 WATER DETAILS — A 27 WATER DETAILS — B 28 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS PUMP STATION DETAILS — A r29 30 PUMP STATION DETAILS — B NPDES CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS 3l ISSUE/REVISIONS I01111� IIIIIII� I e01111� IIIIIII� STATUS: RECORD DRAWINGS SITE PLAN(S) KEY MAP Know whaYs below. Call before you dig. (�19Stantec _ COLLIER COUNTY k== INDEX TO SHEETS wa�� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ""``w:" z7ous7Dlc-0Dzsi OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK Page 341 of 745 LEGEND �x 3 3 MIS i r z MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC: PRE DESIGN FIRE FLOW TEST RESULTS GREATeR NAPLEB PIKE RE exon�ry7)na i U11,111 Plow Te xTc: Tim tq� IPM T r�sn000:T C5�" rerc eT.a avyxuinTar: �� ry xvil: F s�wv m r- v vv�Floa eoir svz:w� Tv.TST: vmr asx: F2_1_2 i lou efu: �_ cemvc F,•. g e ev. reu<cab ncii�e crversc GENERAL NOTES: NPDES REQUIREMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. i(SRe1:ii�PG11�il�1 Z911�:i1`rv[e1�[]IY� 1f11LIlY NOTES: xm�mr %9 Oft X = . MOM Mor 6u=M n.9i9SOYY9NI.�C[}it Stantec SITE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: SITE DESIGN COORDINATION NOTES: cos b ca-mxvcx mx sm mucus a«mKmn rm nd rortv COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION ANO FINAL ACCEPTANCE NOTES: is��nimm . wx smcros no wunors mn ru muw wx - � runs ."xwss�no� c®mw cns GENERAL NOTES Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110/2024 n - ---- - _ __� --- ______—_____ _ ..._— LEGEND �L J Ex-CONSERVAION EASEMENT AREA #} lI) COWER COUND PRESERVE' �,! omo rox (NO PEOESTRAN OR VEHICULAR ACCESS — NO DRRET — O c w," owxm anm amok on nsx "nsss OF. M PG 3444 o O (*�µxuu "ram wm xwo� I E%- CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA 3'4 COLLIER COUNT PRESERVE PW O�" oMas«s (NO PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR ACCESS — NO ENTRY) O I00' 200' LIFE ,'� �. L II ELEVAPON AND SURVEY NOTES: L EXOTIC REMOVAL AND CLEARING NOTES: � L ® ra,ronr onn ro '; L ro nE m.s.�c�w .�, ar ma.na.n. Wars or m.w•m.smm" won II Yam, .l&M 1 m E 'L x --.� _ _ a — — nwwn wn roE 4 .,� tin. , a 6'� ;no'" N, tN i`�; NN r a ------- A, _ �,�w \ BENCHMARK NOTES FILL � i'A�10f'.woO' $ Y -aq dyo \ nwm rae na nMoa+. uW mmnns nu, xn.c T :<Al °'° ai_.� Y. �----•/ __ o Stantec COLLIER COUNTY ;w EXISTING CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION AND CLEARING PLAN w aHLNs COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT a oaas ot-oat-oo P Ate'•". we o�.a. "'""" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK "z270144670I"" 04 n 31 Page 343 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit lssuauce PL20230002379 Data: 6110d024 I I HATCH LEGEND O_ rnu aiar "wmwgu zoP r.,w.iwr aw,e .. I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mo w6R o ra,aaxc�¢)� I I I I I I II I I II / IIII PARCEL HMITS 2��, I III I I I 1 II { IIII PARCEL LIMITS I IIII { EX. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA #4 / COLLIER COUNTY PRESERVE (NO PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR ACCESS -NO ENTRY) EX. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA #3 COLLIER COUNTY PRESERVE OR. 3066. PG. 3422 (NO PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR ACCESS -NO ENTRY) I I / I I I II POND 3 'II IIII Mo e�xlwx�ixl PROJECT BOUNDARY x PROJECT BOUNDARY I I qo [xlfaxcD I II - o F + + + + + + + + + + + IIII + + + + + + + + + + + + + T m + + + + + + + + + + + Q + + + + + 4 + + + + + +Ml R + + + + + + ` + UM XI + + + �� + + — — + _ // e + + + + + JAI/ i m x � c--) gal + + + + PE + ------AI — + � a + aLL+ + + + + , am ,ate + + + a.00 fl�,1 PROJECT BOUNDARY / it II / I II,I ii d — •I � coeoemoe M Stantec COLLIER COUNTY PERMITTING BOUNDARIES COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK 22701446701 os � 3T Page 344 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Cate: 6110d024 LEGEND ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES ro FAW UMNS OF, nn m CLEPRING w 0 N ZONING : AGRICULTURAL LAND USE: VACANT ti C r_ COWER COUNTY PRESERNE - -_(NO PEOEBRIPN OR —CUTAA ACCESS -NO ENTRY) -------------- _- J______ ___-- ---. - -- I BASIN 4�v BASIN 2 ZONING : IPUD y-_ IX. CCUILERA CC EASBNBNTMFA /I._ ARFSE _ _ _ _ (� aRNC -_ ------------------------ .......................... --- WATER _ _ _ _________________ _ _ MANAGEMENT _ _ _____________________ TRACT = ----------------- -------------- TRACT: B BASIN BREAKDOWN BOUNDARY /CONSTRUCTION LIFE \ BASIN'3� �nN ZONING : IPUD LAND USE: DEVELOPMENT TRACT I Ex. coulER courvTY s` ZONING AGRICULTURAL SROVOEAC.IX$ . LAND USE: VACANT PR �I I BASIN 1 C _ (U StanteC COLLIER COUNTY' `°" """"" ZONING DATA PLAN e ga .a, �Ww �aNa.ENrs an:o •nan. .. c.E.e. �1p s" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT w.p zz1oaasici-oac-oosoP Imo" �.a,�a.. bI , ...,. OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK ..". ."" zz�DiaaG�oi,.t, oG a 3i�la.. bl , OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK zz�aiaas�oi,a, os a 3i Page 345 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 X x X x X x X x X xX xX xX xX ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xx xxx II xXxxxxx xx xx xx xx xx x xx i XXx XXx X xXX xXX PROJECT BOUNDARY n��� UTILITY NOTES: xxx XX XX XX xxx xx xxX xXx xxx xxx c N c I ,�w.n�,n•. X xX xXx Xx Xx CONSTRUCTION OMITS " M. Xx Xx xX xX ue.m wr. ee o-e sxanre x xxxxxx omu rmmsm an, m our..x nrra"'" �su Xx XXx XXX XXX X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX w� 4o rya awuEw Xx xxxxxxx Xx Xx Xx ==ON c,wE. xwineo ran mxsnw.-.... r,.r xx., x NOTVE YEGEfATON BUFFEflXx x j I Xx "V. g<= X x x x ° W o<.ann roMN� xxxxxxx xx xx xxxx F I x x x m xXx xXx xxx LEGEND u..m: • v ,< x wo, xii« x x x X �- xx x x xXx x XxxXx XXXX x x x x x J� xxx xxx w xx xx Xx Xx xxx xxx xxx s sD a1 sD 0 ss x xx x xx Xx Xx xX x x x xriar� xXx xXx xXx xXx x x x x x x x x x x !. x x x x xx x x x x x x x .nE x x x o i x x x x h x x x xX I ;F- .. SD —___— x x x x x x #3 Xx x x x x x �y- _ - �L,,J _\—________ __ x x x x x x x x x x GENERATOR XxXXXxXX x XXx}XR�uE —_________________ BUILDING x x - of O s PROJECT BOUNDARY (1YP) FFE-14p20' E I X xXX Xx xX x}°0 1' M xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x 3 ICI^�� �.o� �aA I'm r x x v `° p1 - I'I�F M �• rw�.. on. d _ xxxxxxxxx SHERIFF'S BUILDING W x x x x x TWO-STORY 1q� o0 x xX x xrs FFE-14.20' - 555r wEr v.nu xX xXx _ NSA aV088 -_ w - -- X x X x X X srn II n x � I I Xx xXx xXx mneX�.�n xx xxx xx x m .V x W7� - XX XXX XXX XX XXX X g - leamuq O N O II X X X X j SD XX XX Xx xX � D /@ u —SO ys , II g 3 6 3 E I s XXX XXX XXX m r I _- XxX XxX XxX x PROJECT BOUNDARYx xx x ® III XxX x xxx xxx' 3 xxxxxxxxxxx xxx xxx .�.� X X X X X X X X X X I X X X X X X X X , o a � X X X X X X X X X �r'n X X X X x — ------ XXXXXXX i oxav�¢mX X X X x I —----------- _ X X X x �I xxX, x x xxxxxxx i X xx XxX x x X XXxxXXxX -x= -x—x i i Stantec COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK MASTER UTILITY SITE PLAN n70n!!8]01NC-0OtMI 22701446701 — 07 a 31 Page 346 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 61102024 III X X X X X X X X X XXX XXX xxxxxx- XX XXX XXXXX XxX zx XXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X X X xX XxX xxxxxxxxx xx XXX X Xx- MATCHLINE (THIS SHEET) x wai I II X X XXXx XX XxX XXXXXXXXX X X X X x X xx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a. ---------- -- - I N —J X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >LL Vjpo 0 �m - - i m 'i I -AR 12 �0 60' 120' I XXx xxxxxx Xxxx Xxx - L�Ow �'xX XxXxXx X XX X X X X xX XxX X X X xx BASIN3 III x x z x z xxxxxxxxx 11.39 AC xss _xxx X X x z x z Xx XxX X Xx Xx xxx — z r J 'I NOTE 3 I xxxxxxxxx X X X x X X p i 1 f xx xxx x xx xX xxX xxxxxxxxx xxx XxXxX XxXmx x o I I xx xX xx Xxx Xx X xx xxx xxx sD > u D III xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXx D III I x x N41NE VEOE* W fFER TRAACI X OX xx xx x xxxx xx xX J a ly i X X X xxx X x X xxx X X x x x x l y tr L� I R III NOTE: 3 XxXXXxxxXxXxXxXx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxx r.En �IR„ so Tso I �� I ,r _-- wE m" .�v wmE x x x x x - Xx Xx Xx Xx Xx Xxx xX XX XxX XxX o I I I I NOTE: 3 II II I III I III - xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx �x x x z x z xx xxx xxxxx xxxx x x x x x x x -XxXxXx XxXxXxXxXx SHERIFF'S BUILDING II II III rwe m®„ TWO-STORY `I ® FEE -1420' ®-- NAVD88 le II II I zex I le ii it I I II I�x IIII X X X X X X X X X x x NOTE: 3 x x XxXxXx XxX X X Xx X X X X X X x xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xX XX -- I le m. ell�n i Ilse I I II I ` L xx xx XxX z xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXx BASIN 2 - I, �x x x x x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2,g3 AC % III I xx xxxxxxxx X XXX XX x xx x x x x - x x x x x x _ =g IIII _ XxXxXxXxXxX m .— Kx xx Xxx a, I XxxnXx XxX x x Xx z x z I .XxX x X Xx _--- i --- i x x"`: xx xx xx Xx X x x x x x x x xX xxxXxXXxxxXxXx D PRRmI" X x — —. — r---�- .-F___— l I COLLIER IXPRESERUE 5.06 I I RDDNr, I + � i ' OREA I �� AC. WV- wmv " - r - '�• + + - '• '• " " - - D. WNSERJARON EASEMENT ARFA COWER COVN��PRESER"E EX t NS m ARB 14 WWER CWNNIY PRESERVE r + r + r + + �- + �- .. - r m r - • (NO PENESTRWN OR VEHICUVR + .. ., .. r - + - r - - - - + ACCE55-NO ENTRY) _ 1 LBA 7.20 AC NKDE VEEU-N(NO PEDI—AN OR VEH CU AR AC ESS-NO ENTRO - 3506 PL- � 1 A r r_+_r III• — D so so sD� sp X X x x x X x xxxxx xx x xx \\. _ — — — — — _X HATCHLINE (THIS SHEET) PAVING AND GRADING M�w OEs.,or-o.-so". DRAINAGE NOTES: LEGEND omneE •uw ec ww"E" a".0 wrwsE rvs � a Horn: ii°on"`'"`wx m�'Y nose re"ec g.m wnex nw. nwam w.oE. °'"" ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES: WATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY TABLE Stantec COLLIER COUNTY MASTER PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT na� z�oueiol-ox-ao Ro OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK Page 347 of 745 Stantec COLLIER COUNTY MASTER PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT na� z�oueiol-ox-ao Ro OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK Page 347 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 11. E�(S�HE1 �T IDIT50 -r - X X Le X �.. \ a a \ \ I I I X I I X X X — j X m s X ° ./. .°..w. ___-- tx PRE------------------- X PRE-- ____ ___________ u+En 9 9 - --------------- ------- DRAINAGE NOTES: LEGEND PAVING AND GRADING NOTES: abmmr.,�w°wm�mvrx�.,amk+...��x� v�xw ramarr�wx„wmvou,uxrwrmnrm,x� � r �� � I6 mxnr.+ �SITE PoLIGHTING uNOTES ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES: SITE GRADING PLAN SHEETS KEY MAP Stantec m. COLLIER COUNTY ^ SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING m"°.. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT "m`aa AND GRADING PLAN — A 227Caas7m-03o- 02GP u C.E.B. oK xx nm x.sx m uw. OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK "' zvoiaasYDi'" "°"®` GG.r31 Page 348 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 kw" kx 1k x kx kx 0 0 2040' I I I I I I I I I I m a SITE GRADING "PLAN SHEETS KEY MAP _ _ _I_I_IJ DRAINAGE NOTES- SITE LIGHTING NOTES: xmm ru oxtnswcxzxo-u wnwnw.a »s w,m mxwx: PAVING AND GRADING NOTES: LEGEND ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES: '°"°"`°'.o."`°"°".R'�'°" ._<••�:om..:.nx TME ovx�o.,:ma,...na.Aos«e m.anoa a. mnm,,.�ox..�.: .ow. Imo m:n u.. a<.Kwom., n<w.,rKA.s ao.. 3 xxurcs ix nE uamwu,c nm rc xw mmuxm wmu w,. s n� mxo w,w� mwxrt rxm ms xo AUGUST 2023 ® Stantec mf COLLIER COUNTY SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING m.x.,� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT :/a AND GRADING PLAN - B 22)0446701-03C-1020F p rtn s/m/r C.E.B. K xx ns x.sx OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK mr ruxma 22701446701 10 o, 31 Page 349 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 o 1 1 --� _,� -' -, -,_ r \J I 1 I a a i --NE (SEE.... —ET I2).----- _------- ____ ZLu r.m-------------- --- _------- _---------- - - s i' I 9 u a� I j1 2 m�I---------- ---- - w w �I — m_ _ m -- N Q ! O LL I M+ n�+"e 3 fM ORV PRE-1RGTMENf AREA j'1 5 wI i a °I 8 ---------------------------------- r ! _ ---------------- ------ - W 93 IL ffi so i r, � � I R .- �I - - .�� - - 'ems•— — — — —e a— - i I ra I� I� -- i RTLHLLNE (SEES\\ I J•� If � III -. - � I � I � I Lml ��I q;_� wl � •I ,�-=-I .a AIL �\h�ml •¢ � I mom I �I � I molim I N DRAINAGE NOTES: '� oneeeErmm. ma.a mown u. we.x rr¢�.rm � w ww.m »as °wa s we mn a nxE wm.LL wm mxn,e- SITE LIGHTING NOTES: m"mv ,as a- a PAVING AND GRADING NOTESZIA LEGEND ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES: SITE GRADING PLAN SHEETS KEY MAP Stantec COLLIER COUNTY _ SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT "`" i� AND GRADING PLAN — C zz7=01-03C-1G2GP C.E.B. Iona nL ar xwan a+ an rule ^, OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK zz�oiaas�oi n R ai Page 350 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 SITE LIGHTING NOTES ELEVATION AND SURVEY NOTES. PAVING AND GIiADING NOTES' B no n' i � 4 I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Stantec COLLIER COUNTY ^ SITE UTILITY, DRAINAGE, PAVING m"aas7"., COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT xia AND GRADING PLAN — D 227om-am-i02GP u C.E.B. K xx ns r..eva mru.es. OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK zvDiaas�Di'" "°" izo.si Page 351 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 611W2024 L - --� ----�--- N X I LJ` ary - aJ A \ � L 0� FM- FM1� .r �w�z LLSS�S 1 � a z-� z mnm r w�a-xma �aY¢ W wx we oi. v\IL M FFM 1 5 5 4 4 0.50A -O.Sg% OSO$ -0.44% -0502 t.34% 100% 09]R -t.24% -1.3> O.60R -0.659. 0.11% .01R 223$ 202% FT 10 _- __ _ __-__-_--_ _ -_ _ - __ _ __ _______ 10 5 5 o o 0 i 15 15 O.O1R 1035 -0.67% " 10 ---- - -- 10 5 5 8 0 0 j 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+80 0+00 0+80 ADfMKT =3 Stdntec COLLIER COUNTY PLAN AND PROFILE — A ® =ipi=• aee tea= 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT yam 22=01-D3FD13FP D.LP. OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK 227014467011. "°"" 13 0, 31 Page 352 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 611W2024 #1 SHERIFF'S BUILDING TWO-STORY FFE = 14.20' NAVD88 1 1 111-#I#�111 1 [ u-u�ru�u ,5 m 5 -o.00z 0.00x -a.asz o.00x 0.0oz asx o.00z o.zsx -o.3nz o.o4x �z 0.02x 1,IBx 10 10 5 5 a 0 0 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 3+30 AUWST 2023 }.. nteC COLLIER COUNTY StaPLAN AND PROFILE — B "J" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT a� zz7a+e�oi-WCc l rr OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK 2270,44570,E w. ,a . 31 Page 353 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110/2024 15 $ 15 m m m m m m m 1 n a I I . 1 1 # 10 0 6 6 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 �W SZW w J�w I I ® UTILITY NOTES: 15 15 A s� Iwo 10 — — __ _ ____ __ _ 10 4 I 6 wo-..— 5+00 6+00 7+00 7+60 AUWST 2023 }.. StanteC COLLIER COUNTY PLAN AND PROFILE — C ace. "J" �,°- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT a� zz7a+e7oi-oac-olsrr — D. P. OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK � """" 22701446701 -"` 15 � 31 Page 354 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit 1—... PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 ---------- — — — — — — — - SECTION — III All Section D-D All Section F242 Sectio, Fl-Fl S—f- G-G S—t1-Hl-Hl Section H2 H2 IT, IT, IT, ---------- -- --- -- Section -- --- cc - — — — — — — — — — — - Al— S,,f,, j-j `wort ri Lil OMLPMTINGREQUIREMENTS @ TYPICAL LAKE SECTION W LITTORAL SHELF PLANTING AREA (LSPA) .4- kyStantec COLLIER COUNTY C7777-77°°"�°^° OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK - TYPICAL LAKE SECTION TYPICAL SECTIONS 227014467( Page 355 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 DIS, 6110/2024 ENW f E a Stantec �10"� fL5 COLLIER COUNTY STRUCTURES TABLE c.E.e. °°'"`°^° COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK N= - - """""°` -" 227014467U1 ,ad«o. „ STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME DETAILS COORDINATES PIPES IN PIPES OUT tt E.4365a5.6a UPI -16, 12 INV IN=1o.m (E) UPI -tz, 12 INV ouT=t o.m (s) STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME DETAILS COORDINATES PIPES IN PIPES OUT z6 (E PI 34,m INV ouT=0.65 (N) _ E43seae.sz PIa5.24 INV IN -505 zs s. aa6ea6az Pw].0 Irvv Irv-s4a (w) Plas, as INV DUT-].6o IN) at - =.Ba (sl - PI-ss sr Irvv ouT-].s](w) - e. asseo6.sz Pwz, 10 INV IN=s.za ls) 33 - Plal. ss INV IN=].5](s) PI 30, 35 INv ouT=].5](W) E435]BB.Ba 16 _ s. azemz.95 PI 10. 12 INV IN-O.za (E) Pl ta, to INv ouT-0.z0 (W) ze - PHt15 INv ouT=9Aa (W) as s. assete.]e Plst, is INV IN-e.4o ls) Pwz, is INv ouT-e.zo M1 2 - s.axsw.es Pls, is INV IN �.4o (M PFt, to Iuv ouT�.4o (s) zt - s.4a]a4t6a Plaz, to INvw=s.za ls) STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME DETAILS COORDINATES PIPES IN PIPES OUT 45 MITERED s. aaszzz.sz Iza, to Irvv Iry =nm (s) as MITERED E4 a In.+S INV Irv-e.so I. RR MITERED I-zs, is INV IN-s.m(WI za oTTrPs z Plaz, to IrvvouT+�.zD (rvl ae MITERED Ix,+S INV IN=e.m(W) z5 = Piss, to IrvvouT=z.to (wl IS - PI zt, 4B INV OUT h.]5 (s) 4 aasazsas Ie.4z Irvv Irv=sza (rvl MITERED It,+e INV IN=9.x3 (N) z0 MITERED UPI-, tx INV IN-s.So (E) SIC Mlreas0 ] Iss, tz Irvv Irv=e.sD (E7 a6 ulTsaso Pisa. a5 IrvvouT-2.ao (s) n wnlreas0 Im,s6 Irvv Irv--o.]5 (s) Bs Mlrsaso ] Iae, as Irvv Irv=].sD (s7 Page 356 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 �I ,II flx x x x x ` xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx r -- j - xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x x x x 'I E SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS AND NOTES: III V XxXxX xxx xXxX xxx im�� l i it I I _ Mxur ,xn cuurxr wmnur xm� it x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Rj '.I arcpw I`II xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - w , u ICI I I ORv PRE-iR€AiMEM u�Tn}2 S it O II X x x x x {I xx Xxx XxxxX xxX xXxXxXxX l x x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -------------- ----------. H wn,Rn. wn� xa •,x..E w,>,,w."„ II x x x x x x x x x Xx XX XX xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,I i i; II -.- •� �. o so 0 E.a,� ..�, XxxxX xxX xxxxxxx I ��xas w,o aw.•ow�. x.es xxxxx xxx xxx x;"X x X o XxX I III Upy X Xx vX xX � I I xx xx �� < xrw�mn f --ikx XxX ---- j xx xxx Xx xxxxx xxx xxx xx!� dll- x x xxx xxx x: xxx ,4:q' x x x x x xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xx 1 '1 ;'21 III AHEAD ma Ir,•�.,..�m x x x x x x! m xxxxx xxx xxx xXx - xxx xxxxx xxxx ',,.. �• 'I ii ii ill 15 a STOP xx I X N1 x x x x x ii I - I sov t%® wn aiwl Mm av,l tnion xw. mro tsma sq Ir } xxxxxxxxxxxxx II SHERIFF'S BUILDING TWO-STORY FFE 14.20' ssm `I• II II II O�m f xxxxx xxx xxx xXx I I x xx xxx xx x NAVDf-b+�'•• ,� SDEWAI( ND q I jj xxxxx XxX XxX XxX '- - } Ili XXX XX XX xX mn tt �l- ICI• N Pm I I I j I TWA., om cec w,mws nu ru iumu I I xxxx XxXxXxXxXxXxXx Xx _ - C„ x x X X X xxxxxx I 3.. II II II II I III ,xwwrrcl Ij xx x xX xx ;I xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxx xxxm ,.r'- -X / y 11 x x x xx xxxx xxx xxx ":xx x xxxxxxxxxxxxx x>m _ _ _ _ _ _—_------ -L7mn % nmowme mwmn x x x x x i,�.... oo•�va I Xx xXx xXxXx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx '%•: +, xXX DR aT ., xxxxx are x xxX xxxxxxx 15 �R�Im I x x a Ex. COLLIER CoDRY PRE — AC jIII ' m m- I II ill li I II I i I 04 it I III .•�mw MIWST 2023 }.. StanteC 350x J �x "� COLLIER COUNTY SIGNING AND MARKING PLAN aEe. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK ag zziwie�a, ox 4o,su 22701446701 - -- 1B 31 Aww ..xx, D.L.P. Page 357 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 YPRD —IN GRAB SPECIFIWIION TABLE ¢ PLAN \ •��\��\`/� °vuu' °wx°rxcrwws emx°rvnc mm "cu"nx mnE"� ry SECTION A —A ��ax nm.�v rx°ixswun°x "a"i""smz� s YARD DRAIN & PVC RISER DETAIL CURB INLET GRATE SPECIFICAPON TABLE FDOT TYPE "9" CURB INLET °TOP WITH FDOT TYPE "P" BOTTOM STRUCTURE DETAIL 6-0 STEEL GRATE T�9 STEEL GRATE h A A �b e PLAN r SECTION A—A"mwm.. m..•nm xxx r FOOT TYPE" "E"" s CATCH BASIN DETAIL �' S �CTI�N� sxmrun°e.� FDOT TYPE "D" CATCH BASIN DETAIL A F A ®®LI I I I J I I F - I L---J J PLAN sEcnoN A —A JUNCTION BOX DETAIL kY s o 0 ' CAST IRON GRATE SECTION " °s. r.. TYPE "C" GRATE INLET W/ SIDE INLET DETAIL DESIGN NOTES FOR STORM r � , WATER STRUCTURES A II F I LJ J 'RECOMMENDED PLAN STORM WATER S RUCTURE SECTION A —A GRATE INLET DETAIL PVC STORM WATER DRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL mRCP PLUG DETAIL PVC RISER. GRATE & ROOF RELIEF DRAIN/BUILDING DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIL StanteC COLLIER COUNTY DRAINAGE DETAILS — A u a c.Ee. \� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT s �ad«al•� I� �I xil• fL3 °"`°"" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """"'"°` """°` zz]01446701sm" Page 358 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110d024 A Iar h vancmxx .cnwrxz SECTION A —A EXISTING CONTROL STRUCTURE (CS-1) SECTION DETAIL (TO BE MODIFIED) Lin w1X um.. NOTES (LAKE W/ LITTORAL SHELF PLANTING AREA): "� °' mnuvaurs x..s ma m.m"xm ix °mm ms ms.sr. ro m °rsc"a .° x�o.xdw:n n.z s,.a° s"mms.x° •. m rmvrt y��ii u� me airy m zsunm a.xn m mi w¢,zu wwf m TTNE wm uvsi aurn"mxz. coaer.v. wsn mYuuxmu x mi rammium%" °ry �jsa rsx w mrt mx sui �� �smity "vy SECTION A —A DRY PRE-TREATMENT CONTROL STRUCTURE (CS-2) AND DETENTION AREA SECTION DETAIL TYPE H (2—GRATE INLET) is A -- DESIGN NOTES FOR STORM WATER STROCTORES A �A,n � J A A PUN saw 'RECOMMENDED�m PUN �- i wao t usm a�awm STORM WATER STRUCTURE /��%✓�\ ®-✓ DIMENSION TABLE -- �e G. , ICI r� SECTION A —A mMm' SECTION A GRATE OUTLET DETAIL TYPE "H" INLET DETAIL (WITH SIDE INL s) Ems nar swes�R MBIELL NGLX CONCRETE PIPE CONNECTION FOR FLARED END DETAIL I SECTION A —A '711-FE ° LITTORAL SHELF'ZIATIN." AREA (LSPA) SIGN DETAIL StanteC COLLIER COUNTY DRAINAGE DETAILS - B u a C.E.B. \� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT lamxal.as I� �I �I• m fL3 OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """""°` ""`°` 22701446701s"� Page 359 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 r o.su.rry. sa-rror�was. �.oau..xsF sa. oN a.mmaa"wm wo ru, wmrsm..rs"mr_r."uEms ,oms..mm �mma.n.�c.wars xmmv®.a mnm. DESIGN CONFIGURATION 1 I SECTION Ax A REINFORCINGpDIAGRAM SECTION B—B9 w ��c'y� eeaE TYPICAL VALLEY GUTTER CROSSING DETAIL (FOR TYPE "F" CURB TO TYPE "D" CURB) --'' � "• . ZZL FOR BOULEVARD (A)i m oOESIGN CONFIGURATION 2 �\ "'�\ \ °\m\�/` tter ara -D "n.n srn m suwn� 5_ c — n ume 5 ` xwixc rm srznr,cmo v sruiriu �'�/ sww DESIGN CONFIGURATION 3 DESIGN CONFIGURATION 4 TYPICAL EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB SECTION DETAILS _ o mmw `xwFxr mcc PLAN PROFILE ' TYPICAL TRANSITION CURB DETAIL FOR (TYPE "D" CURB TO TYPE "F" CURB) � nre1 Try 0�6 SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK v. o.a•mmJ '6rsP 1B °"'' "�'^'•'A aa..�. MARKING (MID —BLOCK) TYPICAL WHEEL STOP DETAIL TYPICAL TYPE "D" u CURB DETAIL 11 FOR HIGH SIDE mn o.m s _2�� <; CURR NOTES n xam e z. m.x. "x. mriasmh mm�. r}IF I 2 ",. xx� omEmxu ,w� LLL CROSSWALK AT STOP CONDITION wxw rrvm —�� s.cmm� ox. Fri xw<o ,xwnnnux own s v. FOR LOW SIDE TYPE RA ROADWAY SIGNAGE AND TYPE F"" CURB PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS TYPE "RA" CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL AND GUTTER DETAILS Stantec TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL mr6 rxuwir PROFILE mmc TYPICAL TYPE "D" TRANSITION CURB TO SIDEWALK DETAIL PROFILE TYPICAL TYPE "D" TRANSITION CURB DETAIL CONCRETE PAVEMENT/CURB INTERFACE DETAILS COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK FOR INTERNAL DRIVES AND PARKING (C) ROADWAY COMPACTION NOTES. x',r.).�x ..,r l.,,i,x�•'A',. 'y'i i>'��y_ ,�E wa�mz rzwx�va ON NOTES �r�T,T�r� �T�„p:�x mumuiwc FOR VEHICLE STORAGE AREA/LARGE VEHICLE PARKING/LOADING AND ACCESS AREAS (B) ���������TYPICAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ROADWAY SECTION DETAILS �l1NIVERSSYMBOL DISABLED PARKING SIGNS OF ER— S BO STANDARD AND DISABLED SPACES W/ SIDEWALK (NO CURB) TYPICAL 90' ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE DETAIL r avn mxE a sxMrn i� a rxmm i� TYPICAL 90'.18' DEEP TYPICAL 90'.16' DEEP PARKING SPACE DETAIL PARKING SPACE DETAIL PAVING DETAILS — A 227014467011 21 or 31 Page 360 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110d024 PAV laoaOwaq ru Ai v cou - es „ .. as L To SC m1 on nxo 11a a -j x1f E� TRUCK APRON DETAIL DESIGN CONFIGURATION 1 s9�an°b moo"" O1xO1AE " �7 m"a. a.wsai. o.." amn s�waa sa XO��°wm°�'n msm" OPTON�A DESIGN CONFIGURATION 2 BICYCLE RACK SIDEWALK CURB RAMP SIDEWALK CURB RAMP FOR ROUNDABOUT AND DRIVEWAYS FDOT INDEX N0. 522 CR-F DETAIL FDOT INDEX NO. 522 CR-E DETAIL TYPICAL EDGE OF SIDEWALK - SECTION DETAILS - s�sw..no� ox osT"o a" :Eosna.: �€ inou nwxso sx.. asu. FOR PARKING AREAS AND PAD xn LOCATIONS III"g' PIN ANCHOR ucn.°r. �smro� v°mac ; wnwmxs u�ru FOR SWING GATENOTES g 3 I" �m DETAIL °ssP�,. NDTes_ sxaoix or swo Pw. ix s su:.,x w,o-a.aww =uu .w mo si.naunwz r ". w" mx" PLAN VIEW SIDEWALK. PAD OR PAVEMENT�LL anrom�� mxw" EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL ...c °sTxo ran asuruveLtlx SECTION A mw mn sa�s�um"s rem, u"`vas ® - o um. rom uaw wv swwm x,s sss-m� ua" . ,�,,,�,"„ me „ten mm p osa. mn muuswxa m'- �S�n°"� " �"."• o�.cno:re su s:aw. _ _ ® ��,� Paan�u xasum vus "o veuwwe mm ouwiwsx ins so-m�, snwo� xo sv<m, uosn � mo"� ®ai'un�mxv�i�aui: n.:. �ue"�'szn'wn'�ns � m:�orv0fc f�i m'- �'eiw.� 94°s """"f1b� (zs mu TYPICAL DUMPSTER PAD W/ " SIDEWALK CURB RAMP TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK BLOCK WALL ENCLOSURE DETAIL FOOT INDEX NO. 522 CR-D DETAIL THICKENED EDGE DETAIL OR PAD SECTION DETAIL " WHEN IT SERVES AS "D" CURB " a Stantec COLLIER COUNTY PAVING DETAILS - B —E ALdCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT �i3 - - ��a�w fL3 °°'"`°"" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """""°` ""`°` 22701446701 --t 22or 312P Page 361 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 III'TALL BARS WIRE S— GATE OPENING NENTICALGARN-1 HAPRON s sTRArv°so GAN.F. IN F ENTER or EACH PANEL cGET "L uv W NAIL SPIIKE[( P) TOP Tervslory WIRE `iSRSPACING) 1Ke WINES IP.) oRR�vET (M .NUCI rv(e•�ssPA I c) TA`KHlrvc TENSIDNWl`R,EPs TOP OF —RIB LINE POST OR RrvEr NAce NALnE wIREs(ml T1°tivisr[o TOP °M 3 — uTCH rws Huce,•WNI NpPry RrvELL TTOM)oFFAB E OST WELD " T OR Pu ION- EM 8. a� � CONCRETE BASE BLACK VINYL MINI MESH %1 8' CHAIN -LINK SECURTY FENCE DETAIL �s FENDS D AT NANDHI MAX. aealc ITH rvGT LT REE Fuu TURNS LEAST TENSION AND WITHIN 4- �DBO IFPosTTOM s eHiE) GE sioN BAN w(, ire•DlNALnl EL EvnREs (IC EOo.c. EN""WiHE r E .—BAR TOE sTAX)TI GE / FNKW TOP TENSION BAR OLINK R RrvET FABRID (,ao.CTHN 4M ML OR WIRE AGI .1 L END AND FABaIc)Tio O END OR °ATE PDET pET Iw TMRNUT LT O°�p BRACE RAIL ASSEMBLY. DOUBLE Oa BRACE RAILATTA°HMENT O5 urve POSTanaCHmervTs NBC WELD B� H mawc SOLID COPPER vnREW a SECURE sore OF FENCE ° sns MOLDED ExoTHERMIc WELD ITYPI RAIL BOLT wI*RlA- FABlc RIc EToa�i BOT NXAC LEET,zTocTMael QTENsorv-oElewlReoeT FINISHED GRACE END RAIL BDLTWI D °RRIVET H AGE BOLT FAIL TENSION RAND CC,NHP POST G)B°M FAIL DETAILS NO SCALEPULL POST 4 500 INCH 0.237 INCH OKR L--1 LL o U PERSONNEL GATE GALVANIZED GATE POST SCHEDULE DATEIN°M NaLI TH UT INOMIN F .Io --1 " Fp OFFSET HINGE LATCH ASSEMBLY STANDARD HINGE GATT NOTIS ' METHODS or INSTALLATION THAT COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFICATIAND ARE NOT NTENCED To LIMIT OTHER TYPE OF FENCE SECTIONNS.I°MENTs 2. SWING GAT' 'HALL BE COISTRUCTED I TI DROP R111, PADI-OCKS, LATCH AS.E.— AND GATE KEEECP E.CEPT AS NOTED S NA'iao� SOS"zUL`BxoMNHEisa aaE)RE°;'EFWELDED CONSTRUCTION OR SHALL BE ASSEMBLED USING�ESO.`AS EOFB,.NCT SHIA StanteC COLLIER COUNTY FENCING DETAILS A u �. OE.e. \� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT �ad«al•� I� �I �I • fL3 °°'"`°"" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """""°` " — 227014467015 Page 362 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 it s[.�s..l[•iHiNNiD]F)t..�ll 3Ff.=.=.=.=dt.)F3t.=.=.=dt.=UF)i� �[I IFIF�•SN/NS.S.FIFsdI[.�� ' 111 �.�.[•�.sNit•�.�N�[ti•�F�3F�.i.)ti.)ti.)F3F)Fi.�.i.�.]F)!� nN��IF��INsN F�� � �Ifltltlr r - Yltflttllflflflflfl�lfltlfd ' °00. I,�s �jI <°DB• ° III �a°.., �. � I v � J J T AL xHP MOTOR &BOTTOMMEMBERS=lm`=� PER ELEVATION \ ATE FRAMP GGAaG PaSTQ 0 INSIDE n RD POSTS G,PUN V111Mn NGLLn PRG SEE NSHGPnNA�NGSGnnF=E,)ENGTH6 PLAN %� SLIDING GATE DETAILS U Me i1 BARBED -TAPE MOUNTING DETAIL GAPCOMPRE—N! SPRING A. PAD TRUSS i� GUIDE WHEEL DETAIL C. 4S ETEEI PRE PC — CONCRETE POCTING GUARD POST DETAIL E MOUNTING D TAIL „', AES(TYP) CHAIN -LINK SECURITY FENCE DETAIL O AUGUST 202 StaClt@C COLLIER COUNTY FENCING DETAILS B "` COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Nam. - - fL3 OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK ""`°` 22701446701 243°r 31xP Page 363 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit 1... PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 —A T1111 1 F —A—z' 0 T U -ER —R—D MATE— EFER T, Hl— __._ 2 F I oF A E UNPAVED AREA TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL EXISTING A/C PIPE HEADWALL NEW I EXISTING PIPE RllTRlIllC JOINT PIPE CONFLICT DETAILS S-4 All L 1 PAVED AREA TRENCH RESTORATION DETAIL at FOR PRIVATE ROADS -M C� TYPICAL VALVE SETTING DETAIL Tl R.AD, MAIII AFD _T . .... FILL P7 _NZ/401 VEHICULAR GUARD POST DETAIL Eo T F M GF TTE op- TE I "HEI IEPA"T 11 111E _%�lElXWTTll' �EF E 2 NP�Z`L 71="LF �E, D A A F �LF T 7E ILI' 11 lH 1 M111 r I.El, —R. lEllR III —-l—LE R11�111 .11 I-L �E 'Ep,_ _. , —T PPEU E ER 1� T �E 71�21 LE 7M �E Va TEZ I TT TH�E,��A�T_ TF�R_ M_ R PPEUN C., E. ZER, IA R 1 .11 F 11 111 TH. I E 111 IRIERIA — .11TI—L lElllANE- PI PE SLPARATI ON DETAIL IIIIIIIIIIII11B IEIIAIN EEELP(E, 'LENI EE (3) H IN R_EDUCER (4) `C T • I 11IL, 11E —T 1- 111T 1E11DF 111E 11 — �� —LE. — NEIT I—LE1 1ED-1 lL ENDI E I TH1115 11HE11LE 1111 TI IF I El — �1 11.1 1 3 4 PIPE RESTRAINT SCHEDUIFE G_ 1 o Stantec COLLIER COUNTY GENERAL DETAILS _= '_ Ea c.Ee. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK 22701446701 Page 364 of 745 IEIIAIN EEELP(E, 'LENI EE (3) H IN R_EDUCER (4) `C T • I 11IL, 11E —T 1- 111T 1E11DF 111E 11 — �� —LE. — NEIT I—LE1 1ED-1 lL ENDI E I TH1115 11HE11LE 1111 TI IF I El — �1 11.1 1 3 4 PIPE RESTRAINT SCHEDUIFE G_ 1 o Stantec COLLIER COUNTY GENERAL DETAILS _= '_ Ea c.Ee. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK 22701446701 Page 364 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110d024 OFAT 11 orvsnm asTE Fr sI D BLOWOOF v'4 n*x rvoss eee L IF �1,'\ (sEc rvo rvFLa r:P / �.1 LB RIND', PILL B-1111 SIOE VIEW LBLUSL TEMPORARY BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY WITH T DETAIL —pm W� 1 SAMPLING POINT DETAIL ws M ISCREEN E, N IRIIIE wHw FHH ooLLIEN cHDNTh D ND �IITI FA 'EST PIT uR`A"'_ E NANE LT PRODUCT APp°NIx n NSA s-TaNE_ IMINIMUM nHER B IP) sroPE . oR UAIo(SEEE CONTY PPE Y �FAPPwc SANDLE HAPPS -ER MAIN POTABLE WATER AIR RELEASE VALVE DETAIL w__ ITTE xensso11T soon E (lEl aEI.E PRO LT I.il w 11 A- FLUSH cow N.n srorvs VA ATMP HT a'ATMEN?N� sal s orvou plID .1 wail ary � ANT. RP uNo=(nLB � BE M'E IALPE NOTES: E EN AUTOMATIC WATER MAIN Wsf 2c' FLUSHING DEVICE DETAIL C 1sEE N HRH' I ITE 11111LL cN ♦uo ERcsseslN`HVIPEWAT" ELL \ u YT PASS ON c NI (,iEHAS, ° FOR "coy FI AOHSTAINLESSH1 I2z TLENc w^ I27 yaT eAris ccmmNaa� AID (a) Ma eAHs olncouaL 3/11T NFI>pE IHHEIPJLD TH E / / TER v aOUPL wrtH No SIDE VIEW s _ ss EL 1111 F�Nv aooucT , IT. NBRIERAT16.P (SEE APPENDIX oF) ro EBE CAXON EE -R.P_ LIST. APPENDSo EH PERMANENT BACTERIAL SAMPLE POINT DETAIL MTSxTVISE 1,,-6 _o LOIAL FIE IS NT SN.,"t=r- cocwx — ,TT'ri..�.Ta "�OR IND ; � I\R�rN - a �EIc�k R�D -SPENT � � �3NHE INly y. Y )ALL N UI t IN nrnMi, xr 011 PLPI�tAa�)D a�kt � L J RE<aLLR AINA T(nP( BHRENT 1.1 MANN—TORE ANo YEAR IT MANTIPTINE MIST BE 2, ALL TING lAINS WR FIRE HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED SHALL BE HOT TAPPED. 5 ALL nNE ivoN.ANT BANNEL.. lxALL BE A MINIMUM —1/1 IN III-11TNPE AND ;HALL 8, ILL COlP0NEN7A THAT COME IN-0 CONTACT ITT DRINKINA BSVBO STILL ICNFORM TO NET BLIND_ " FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL rs nokui�o."s CONNECTION allo ER MAIN c (cnv1N) o. THA NOTE Stantec WATER DETAILS A u COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PM d �ad«al•� I� �I �I• a� fL3 °°'"`°"" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """""°` ""`°` 22701446701 Page 365 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit 1... PL20230002379 Date: 6110/2024 Y�v J 3 AND As AA A� EWATER NE7ER 11- -.Ell- 1111N. 11.1 111GLE lElllE CE,�l ZNN ` � I—LI lElllE � 11111.�N NAINTENANCE DtITYLZaWATER , — m NOTE —E]o ... 2 ------- St COLLIER COUNTY 1. - TAILS B ant.L C WATER DE COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Ell 997n 1 4497n 1 Page 366 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110/2024 ` 35 dr o �w -- �p — /I F, P 11DE E E �I L=EEE°EET.APPEEo E� IS"Ll o11T Ln I"ENo. E . >. 11= L ELEVATION EEIER apT DerAILN.�_i� NoN REAS a F—E ON t�EIE R uaE " �SANITARY� n;so�Es _ SEWER ea L l,g DP \ k PLAN AN-1E% o�( s 21 3,< \,. z SECTION aRo-Ec oR MANHOLE RING AND COVER DETAIL Ew NF. 11 � ss. cry llTeL A a Rao NaN— .1, L 5 "a 10SE��a`. rw/ o Sm Paa s u£ who = 'N - �� a Ba �V s3 '\ sEkEa R °. " _IEN av w ERrv° MN— n PE ELEVATION se rmevuyuyeaes as --- - COLLIER COUNTY " Stantec SANITARY SEWER DETAILS �. c.E.e. "` COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT - - �ad�.l •� I� �I �I • I°°� fL3 °°'"`°"" OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK """""°` ""`°` 227014467015 Page 367 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Date: 6110d024 _. ..,,,.,__,"I_ � III uare a,xx 11E - F„re. IET- CL, PUMP STATION ANDC WASTEWATER DETAILS .�.. L w.� r _ iW ac suavorer ocr�re� n� cxnA ` PUMP STATIONAND WASTEWATER DETAILS � — _ `N "7�, Missing or invalid reference File: R:\cad\2023 CAD Standards\collier—county—utility—details\WW—g.pdf �I PUMP STATION CONCRETE DETAILS I PUMP STATION LIGHTNING PROTECTION DETAILS R, �yy yyEyT 9C Stantec No��r COLLIER COUNTY ^^" PUMP STATION DETAILS — A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMl I""" ., OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK F 227014467.1 ze o, 31 Page 368 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 wnEo wx _ ® cuice I exncKEr sc'cri ; osKn�nAmm � renic Noroim DIMENSION PAoou noPE �� K �10a iPEa itss A can oPw u,1Nuu �a[aE�wDs[ mN %EPaa `� ♦ - I-0 oa 4. SAS PPo� �� II u. n N —E PIPE D m o ,.. � m Pia �PPENoI. P 1� aEaIam, P..NE P N ll I o n PIEL o UPM� D. P PB a N 0 1 y w0' i" -10 0, uPME r vPEr NcnnoN {` — wrr... Al rnAvin ixmr aP.olNc Nor m P o e, w� Ducey. au« * wrmu D P) I�P� M'NIMMM a � O ro> 41 a ® nxm N uwmm w a mx w a s s a�uPN B/s' /� wonrvoK(M N MMM ts7 mm eurm wvi rm ruiux ua ruex am,u Iuce ww sraxF� �'- i /�� Fmm -'fy- TCs 'R� _ 4e enxs e' ac Ew mE ALL 5 NLss aNLL 116 � I.�ATNC. l� -x i�'�'c %/Fi// � GUMmR — U PUMP STATION v2oe �a WW 7 �_w.3z� os�N��ENE oN DETAIL — PROFILE v SECTIONoA—A MtMll Stantec COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK PUMP STATION NOTE: 1,0" PUMP STATION DETAILS — B �»ea w»ea 227014467011--- ----n 30 ., 31 Page 369 of 745 Collier County Reviewed and Approved For: Permit Issuance PL20230002379 Dm, 6110d024 EX. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA #4 COLLIER COUNTY PRESERVE (NO PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR ACCESS) (NO ENTRY) SILT 1 — vacs[avE a (m�� III r. SD RG.B 13 \ ,, I � f I �LT�xET I i I � i I I I aaeEa eouxawr mPI T �rxcExiimi a w 7 0 a3 0 0 Z 00 W DISCHARGE CONTROL NOTES_ EH. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA #3 COLLIER COUNTY PRESERVE ` (NO PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICUTAR ACCESS) C010.E`"`°'"114AS0"`o.w.�E.nm "a�wom rs'..n wos�i"s �.o axon (NO ENTRY) ACCESS WAY - SlIT FDx Stantec uE 6 Haas. h% ,T SINGLE ROW OF SILT FENCE �/� � u /� W�uEwsws wows uwc DouBLE Row CONSTRUCTION DF sl Lr FEncC OF A FILTER BARRIER P� ELEVCiIOfI PROPER PLACEMENT OF A FILTER BARRIER W,0e5IN A DRAINAGE WAY ���l1lca I i I�uulm' 'In n^Iluu ��' S�l�!"43 COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK TURBIDITY BARRIER NOTES T i1O wrmx�vmw�mwwno,�.w�oe owvuwr ,I `1e � � .cwxc sm �� FLOATINNGG�TURBIDIIY x � BARRIER A. II II oMW�aa�.. o. �II II vwom e.ms owssn �ounox or STAKED TURBIDITY BARRIER .�wc �xo r3 mn TURBIDITY BARRIERS / IT CONSTRUCTION OF A STRAW BALE BARRIER STRAW DROP INLET BALE DROP- IW BALE DROP INLET SEDIMENT FILTER LEGEND — — SINGLE ROW SILT FENCE DOUBLE Row SILT FENCE �y J TEMPORARY TURBIDITY BARRIER (DOUBLE) �....r FLOW ARROW ® INLET PROTECTION NPDES CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS Page 370 of 745 � Pow" +iPC F- nrps ra 'rwp .� wr— tl �Arrdrw� v .� 11ui�i'T ;f asp r Y - r:•1 .L. sw -�'K. ri�]��yf' i •+ 111h% rhm x`vW�Li' • t•h7MrrT)dINV " I..tis ,•,� -1�•u A I5 : I Upr! •L '� i f' �N 1 r y i.relfy � � 1 ■ r� - -- ` Y9r1MA 'r �r 110, k Y W • U ui[lHr [i • � �'•. •. ' . . ; ,. Z- ' 7 :�['Ml4tt'Itl u�]'` r�l r ii LTal ES1�JiQi , LGBSC f3s3P4 Rawl L i_y�•ti•�11 �__ - . lAUIL' ZII: �41r•� `} r+y',i' di-rk'.nlrc - � � r IA - PC { .. .Oxhl !,.4k'I:'N y bd A S4pst11S ! ilix5q ._ � ! '� •.t � � Irw+il I�leeydimrkingf ._ . RI 1�FulM Maple.5175 RL u:t ONI�..► At - Location #2 eY i4ajT HomeDepot lyttpk a yr 1 j � v oc3Ole Mao& :,tikes_ !'fi.RR as« ►AY k, 64s,sc Gator Circle and 371h St Entr ad a Cape Got -al ;.. Cape Coral i�_"}(1�c' '. f r E3 rryr�jhOm + {i•. �� i Nk *qj jr FarrMyers - a +,Ramtar■ It- qm F lLri41i d"t �a �� Gau�ecnlJ�� ACV ` I� rr�..n�}f h:• whirr , I At 4 c-:s I Frgrl�a +rhidf4fr ' y re r +.lt2 pM:t F L 24117 Nutiorlud Afca Nk � • _ 4 f Kdldlo�fi� r AIRL1* : I ' � r - SClii4` 1'iYi•• Ar r r i ® Stantec COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK Environmental Assessment Report August 3, 2023 Prepared for: Collier County 3959 City Gate Boulevard Naples, FL 34117 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc 1821 Victoria Avenue, Suite 1 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Project Number: 2270446701 Page 374 of 745 The conclusions in the Report titled Collier County GOBP are Stantec's professional opinion, as of the time of the Report, and concerning the scope described in the Report. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the scope of work was conducted and do not take into account any subsequent changes. The Report relates solely to the specific project for which Stantec was retained and the stated purpose for which the Report was prepared. The Report is not to be used or relied on for any variation or extension of the project, or for any other project or purpose, and any unauthorized use or reliance is at the recipient's own risk. Stantec has assumed all information received from Collier County (the "Client") and third parties in the preparation of the Report to be correct. While Stantec has exercised a customary level of judgment or due diligence in the use of such information, Stantec assumes no responsibility for the consequences of any error or omission contained therein. This Report is intended solely for use by the Client in accordance with Stantec's contract with the Client. While the Report may be provided by the Client to applicable authorities having jurisdiction and to other third parties in connection with the project, Stantec disclaims any legal duty based upon warranty, reliance or any other theory to any third party, and will not be liable to such third party for any damages or losses of any kind that may result. V Prepared by: Signature Fernando Guillen, Jr. Printed Name Reviewed by: Raymond K. Loraine rrinteu ivamu Approved by: Signature Chris Brockmeier Printed Name Page 375 of 745 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................1 Introduction and Project Location................................................................................................................. 1 VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES & FLUCCS CODES...................................................................1 Coverand Vegetation................................................................................................................................... 1 SiteConditions.............................................................................................................................................. 1 FLUCCSCodes............................................................................................................................................ 1 LISTEDSPECIES.......................................................................................................................2 ATTACHED FIGURES Figure 1: FLUCCS Map Figure 2: Listed Species Transect Map Figure 3: Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP) Management Plan for Listed Species Project Number: 2270446701 Page 376 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Introduction Introduction and Project Location Stantec was requested to perform an updated environmental inspection for listed species and potential wetlands related to proposed development of the project property, which will consist of a law enforcement facility and impound lot. The Collier County Government Business Operations Park (GOBP) is a project site within the Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP) property, which has previously undergone extensive agency review and approval. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) issued Environmental Resource Permit No. 11-0285328-002 for the CCRRP project, and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) issued Permit No. SAJ-2011-00626. The project is located at 3959 City Gate Boulevard, Naples, FL 34117. The respective Parcel ID is 00289720004. The area of the project parcel totals approximately 43.5± acres. The project parcel is surrounded by medium density single-family homes to the west, an injection well and undeveloped land to the east, and undeveloped land to the north and south. Vegetative Communities & FLUCCS Codes Cover and Vegetation The cover and vegetation associations for the project were verified using 2022 aerial photography based on a scale of 1" = 200' and on -site field investigation. The cover and vegetation assemblages were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). The attached Figure 1 (FLUCCS Map) depicts the location of cover and vegetation within the property. No state or federal jurisdictional wetlands were identified during the site survey. Site Conditions The project parcel consists of disturbed land with spoil piles with overgrown exotics and forested hardwood areas on the property overgrown with invasive species. The exotic vegetation leaf litter throughout the forested area forms a dense, impenetrable ground cover. These conditions are generally unsuitable for the listed species targeted during the survey as listed below. The disturbed, open area contains vegetation and soil that are not ideal for burrowing species. FLUCCS Codes FLUCCS Code 411 E4 Pine Flatwoods (76-100% Exotics): This upland map unit consists of undeveloped land. There are pine flatwoods species present but dominated by invasive species. The existing groundcover on the subject parcels is primarily comprised of Page 377 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) three -flower beggarticks (Bidens alba), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and slash pine (Pinus elliottii). FLUCCS Code 740 E4: Disturbed Lands (76-100% Exotics): This map unit consists of a portion of the property previously cleared of vegetation. Existing vegetation consists of three -flower beggarticks, foxtail (Alopecurus), ragweed, cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), cabbage palm (Saba/ palmetto), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). Table 2.1 FLUCCS Codes Within Project Area FLUCCS Description Acreage Code 411 E4 Pine Flatwoods (76-100% Exotics) 14.2 740 E4 Disturbed Lands (76-100% Exotics) 29.3 Total Acreage 43.5 Listed Species The project site is included in the larger CCRRP project area that was the subject of an extensive wildlife assessment and conservation planning effort completed in 2012. The purpose of the Stantec's site assessment was to confirm the current status of listed species potentially inhabiting the project area that are regulated by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Stantec environmental scientists conducted parallel pedestrian transects, no more than 20 feet apart, in the early mornings of July 7 and 11, 2023 to assure 100% coverage of the project area in accordance with the methodologies outlined by the FWC (see attached Figure 2: Listed Species Transect Map). Table 3.1 State or Federally Listed Species Summary Page 378 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Common Name Scientific NameListed Probability of Preferred Habitat FLUCFCS Status Occurrence Codes Reptiles Eastern Indigo Drymarchon FT Low Various upland and 411 Snake couperi wetland habitats, winters in xeric habitats Gopher Tortoise Gopherus ST Observed Sandhill, xeric oak scrub, 411, 740 Po emu sand pine scrub, scrubby latwoods, shrub and brushland Birds Bald Eagle Haliaeetus BGEPA Low Nests in tall trees along 411 leucocephalus coasts; rivers and lakes Red -cockaded Picoides borealis FE Low/Not Likely Cavities within living pine 411 Woodpecker rees (RCW) It Mammals Big Cypress Fox Sciurus niger ST Not Observed Open pine flatwoods, 411 Squirrel avicennia cypress strands, broad- leaf evergreen hammocks, mangroves, and oak forest Florida Bonneted Eumops floridanus FE Low/Not Likely Roosts in forested and 411 Bat other areas with tall, mature trees or other areas with suitable roost structures; Forages over pen upland and wetland habitats F=Federally Listed / S=State Listed; E=Endangered / T = Threatened / BGEPA = Protected pursuant to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act Page 379 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Gopher Tortoise Two inactive gopher tortoise burrows were recorded and flagged in the project area. Despite most of the site having dense groundcover, the area where the two burrows were located did have suitable habitat for gopher tortoises. As the consultant in charge of gopher tortoise location and removal, Earth Tech Environmental, LLC will conduct a 100 percent survey for tortoise burrows and if necessary will obtain an FWC Gopher Tortoise permit prior to commencing construction. Gopher Tortoise Commensal — Eastern Indigo Snake No eastern indigo snakes were observed during Stantec's site visit. There is a low possibility for eastern indigo snakes to occur on within the project site due to the lack of gopher tortoise burrows. The project will comply with the federal Standard Protection Measures for Eastern Indigo Snake as approved in the CCRRP Management Plan for Listed Species during site preparation and project construction. Bald Eagle The Audubon's Eagle Watch Nest Locator Map and was reviewed to verify whether the project area fell within the 330-foot or 660-foot buffer imposed under federal law for recorded bald eagle nests in the area. There were no active bald eagle nests identified on the databases that were within 660 feet of the project area. The nearest nests in the region (CO06, CO056, and C0015) were between 8,500 and 13,000 feet away. However, a bald eagle call was heard faintly in the direction of C0015. No nests or bald eagles observed were observed during the field visit. Therefore, a permit is not required. Red -cockaded Woodpecker The GOBP project site, surrounding CCRRP property, and properties in the region have been extensively surveyed in the past for the presence of active cavity trees within living pine trees to locate additional breeding clusters in the North Belle Meade area. No additional RCW cavity trees have been observed on the subject property or in the region during annual surveys conducted by other consultants, most recently Boylan Environmental Consultants and Earth Tech Environmental, LLC. No active or inactive cavity trees were observed and ecologists did not observe RCW individuals foraging on the site during the July 2023 survey. The greater CCRRP property is still complying with the RCW Management Activities plan approved in the Management Plan for Listed Species for the approved CCRRP project. The GOBP is not expected to have any impacts on RCW. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel The project area was previously surveyed in 2020 by Stantec ecologists and no Big Cypress fox squirrels were observed. The recent walk through conducted in July 2023 resulted in no fox squirrel observations. The overall CCRRP project will comply with the management plan for big cypress fox squirrels outlined in the CCRRP Management Plan report. Based on the previous and current surveys, it is expected that fox squirrels will not be impacted. Page 380 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Florida Bonneted Bat The project area is within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) consultation area. A limited roost survey was previously conducted in 2020 by Stantec ecologists with no Florida bonneted bat individuals or nests were observed. The habitat observed during the July 2023 survey is of very low quality to provide potential foraging habitat due to dense sub -canopy and canopy being dominated by exotic vegetation. The project area did not contain trees with appropriate cavities or other structures to provide suitable habitat for Florida bonneted bats. After reviewing the FWS Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Key, the GOBP project keys to a determination of may affect, but not likely to adversely affect bonneted bats. Implementation of habitat conservation measures outlined in the overall CCRRP Management Plan for Listed Species approved by Collier County may be expected to serve as best management practices to benefit Florida bonneted bats, should they occur in the region of the project. Page 381 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) FIGURE 1 FLUCCS Map Page 382 of 745 071l 3 Page 383 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Figure 2 Listed Species Transect Map Page 384 of 745 Page 385 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park (GOBP) Figure 3 Collier County Resource Recovery Park Management Plan for Listed Species Page 386 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park Updated Listed Species Survey -Memo of Findings USACE Permit No. SAJ-2011-00626 (SP-KDS) FDEP Permit No. 11-0285328-002 USFWS Consultation Code 2012-F-0324 December 8, 2020 Introduction During a pre -application meeting with Collier County Environmental Services Department, Stantec was requested to perform an updated listed species survey on the Collier County Government Business Operations Park (CCGBOP) project site. The CCGOBP project site contains approximately 61.7 acres and is located within Section 25, Township 49 South, and Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (see Project Location Map -Exhibit A). The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) issued Environmental Resource Permit No. 11-0285328-002 for the Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP) project and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued Permit No. SAJ-2011-00626 and a Biological Opinion regarding listed species issues for the project. The Collier County Government Operations Business Park property is part of the Collier County Resource Recovery Park property. Stantec is preparing a Collier County Site Development Plan Application and the Collier County Environmental Resources department requested an updated listed species survey. Updated Listed Species Survey A copy of the Management Plan for Listed Species approved by the Collier County Environmental Resources Department as part of the Collier County Resource Recovery Park (PL20150002737) is included as Exhibit B. Also included is a copy of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map of the subject property, prepared by others. Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is protected by the U.S. Migratory Bird Treaty Act and protected as an Endangered species by the Federal Endangered Species Act. The RCW listed as a Federally designated Endangered Species by Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species Rule. The Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP), and properties within the region, have been extensively surveyed in the past for the presence of cavity trees within living pine trees in an effort to locate additional breeding clusters in the North Belle Meade. In the past, no additional RCW cavity trees have been observed on the subject property or in the region during annual surveys conducted by DeLotelle & Guthrie, as far back as 2003, and most recently by environmental scientists from Wild Folk, Ecotone Environmental, and Boylan Environmental Consultants. The results from the past RCW surveys conducted by previous consultants indicated the subject property does not contain active or inactive RCW cavity trees. Ecologists from Stantec performed meandering pedestrian transects across the site to provide near 100% coverage looking for the presence of RCW cavity trees or RCW individuals foraging on the site. Stantec ecologists observed no active or inactive cavity trees and did not observe RCW individuals foraging on the subject property during the updated listed species survey conducted in December 2020. The subject property is complying with the Red -cockaded Woodpecker Management Activities approved in the Management Plan for Listed Species for the approved CCRRP project. V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 387 of 745 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) The Big Cypress fox squirrel (BCFS) is listed as State Threatened by Florida's State Endangered and Threatened Species Rule. The Federal Status of the BCFS is Not Listed. The subject property is dominated by earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). BCFS prefer open ground cover to forage and most habitats on the site are infested with exotic vegetation. No BCFS nests or individuals were observed on the subject property during surveys conducted by previous environmental scientists. Ecologists from Stantec observed no BCFS individuals or potential nests during the updated listed species survey conducted in December 2020. The subject property is complying with the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Activities approved in the Management Plan for Listed Species approved for the CCRRP. The limits of the preserves on the subject property have been flagged in the field prior to clearing and/or construction activities. Immediately prior to construction or clearing, the area scheduled for development will be re -surveyed for the presence of fox squirrel nests. If no nests are found, the clearing will be allowed to commence. If any nests are observed, buffers of 125 feet will be maintained around each nest tree until the nests are found to be inactive or abandoned. In order to consider the nest inactive or abandoned, it will be observed on 3 consecutive days during the morning or evening hours. If no squirrels or sign of activity are documented in the 3 days, FWC will be contacted and the tree containing the nest will be removed and the clearing of the area will commence. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) The gopher tortoise is listed as State Designated Threatened by Florida's State Endangered and Threatened Species Rule and the Federal Status as Regionally Threatened/Candidate. Stantec conducted an updated gopher tortoise survey and documented a total of 22 burrows (18 active and 4 potentially active) during the December 2020 updated listed species survey, see Gopher Tortoise Burrow Location Map -Exhibit C. A permit shall be prepared and submitted to FWC for the relocation of captured gopher tortoises on the site. Captured tortoises will be relocated to a gopher tortoise conservation bank or habitat approved by FWC. The Gopher Tortoise Management Activities, as part of the Management Plan for Listed Species. approved for the Collier County Resource Park will be followed. Once a relocation permit has been acquired by FWC for the property, the site will be re -surveyed for the presence of gopher tortoise no longer than 4 weeks prior to site clearing. The physical relocation of gopher tortoise will be done by a qualified FWC Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent and will occur as follows: A flexible hose will be snaked down the burrow in order to track the direction of burrow. A backhoe will carefully excavate soil material until just before reaching the end of burrow. Excavation will then be conducted manually to ensure no injury to the tortoise. All captured tortoises will be measured and their scutes will be notched according to the prearranged numbering system per the recipient site requirements, and then placed in crates and moved to the gopher tortoise recipient area. In addition, commensal species within gopher tortoise burrows will also be safely relocated to the on - site preserve. If any Eastern indigo snakes are encountered, they will be allowed to vacate the area prior to continuation of work. Note: "tortoises will not be captured/relocated on days for which the overnight low temperature for that day and the two consecutive days thereafter is forecasted by the U.S. National Weather Service to be below 50 degrees Fahrenheit. This 3-day window of milder overnight temperatures is to allow the relocated tortoises to settle into the recipient site". V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 388 of 745 Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corias couperi) The Eastern indigo snake is listed as Federally Designated Threatened by the FWC and Threatened by the FWS. No Eastern indigo snakes have been observed on the subject property during surveys conducted by previous environmental scientists or by Stantec ecologists during the December 2020 updated listed species survey. There is a possibility for Eastern indigo snakes to occur on the property due to the presence of gopher tortoise burrows. The Standard Protection Measures for Eastern Indigo Snake will be followed as approved in the CCRRP Management Plan for Listed Species. The approved Eastern Indigo Snake Management Activities and Standard Protection Measures for Eastern Indigo Snake include: 1. An Eastern indigo snake protection/education plan shall be developed by the Applicant or requestor for all construction personnel to follow. The plan shall be provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for review and approval at least 30 days prior to any clearing activities. The educational materials for the plan may consist of a combination of posters, videos, pamphlets, and lectures (e.g., an observer trained to identify Eastern indigo snakes could use the protection/education plan to instruct personnel before any clearing activities occur). Informational signs should be posted throughout the construction site and along any proposed access road to contain the following information: a. a description of the Eastern indigo snake, its habits, and protection under Federal Law; b. instruction not to injure, harm, harass, or kill this species; c. directions to cease clearing activities and allow the Eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site on its own before resuming clearing and; d. telephone numbers of pertinent agencies to be contacted if a dead indigo snake is encountered. 2. If not currently authorized through an Incidental Take Statement in association with a Biological Opinion, only individuals who have been either authorized by a section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or by the State of Florida through the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for such activities, are permitted to come in contact with an Eastern indigo snake. 3. An Eastern indigo snake monitoring report must be submitted to the appropriate U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida Field Office within 60 days of the construction or clearing phases. The report should be submitted, whether or not, Eastern indigo snakes are observed. The report should contain the following information: a. any sightings of Eastern indigo snakes and b. other obligations required by the FWC, as stipulated in the permit. Prior to clearing activities, a pre -construction meeting will be held with contractors. A sign will be posted (similar to Exhibit D) in the construction area (at the construction trailer or permit board) and each worker will be provided with an information brochure similar to Exhibit D. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat is listed by the FWS as Endangered and is listed as Federally Designated Endangered by Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species Rule. No Florida bonneted bat individuals or cavities were observed by Stantec ecologists during the 2020 updated listed species survey. A limited roost survey was performed by Stantec ecologists. Much of the potential foraging habitat on the subject property is very low quality due to the dense sub -canopy and canopy being dominated by exotic plant V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 389 of 745 species. The canopy, sub -canopy, and groundcover is extremely thick and overgrown with a mix of very few living slash pine canopy trees, very few surviving cypress in the canopy/subcanopy, cabbage palm, slash pine saplings, and exotic vegetation including earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, and Caesar -weed (Urena lobata) occurring in the groundcover, subcanopy and canopy. Mitigation for potential impacts to Florida bonneted bat are being provided on the overall Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP) per the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Biological Opinion and approved through the Management Plan for Listed Species approved by Collier County for the development of the CCRRP (see Exhibit E Management Plan for Listed Species approved by the USACE Permit). Approximately 166.53 acres of forested habitat shall be preserved on the CCRRP site, which includes 68.20 acres of pine flatwoods habitat and 98.33 acres of mixed pine and cypress habitat. The following is a basic framework for what the onsite management for bonneted bats will include: 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat, and wildlife populations. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (USFWS 2003) are met. An exception to the Recovery Plan will be preservation of existing snag trees as potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 5. Preserve existing snag trees located within the preserves in order to maintain as potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 6. Install two bat houses within the preserve as potential roost locations for bats. All of these activities will provide an immediate bonneted bat net conservation benefit and will benefit all other species outlined in this plan. See the RCW sections of the Management Plan for Listed Species for detailed descriptions of land management activities that will apply to both species. The following is a more detailed description on bonneted bat specific activities (#5 and #6): 5: Installing and maintaining at least two bat houses within the CCRRP preserve areas. At least two bat houses will be installed within the CCRRP preserves. The Applicant will consult with Fly by Night, Inc. (www.flybynightinc.org) regarding exact specifications and placement of the houses. The bat houses will be maintained according to best management practices for bats as outlined by Fly by Night, Inc. 6: Monitoring and Reporting Installed bat houses will be monitored annually for 5 years. Houses will be checked for activity and determinations will be made for any maintenance that might be necessary. Annual Property Data Reports will be submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for 5 years (in concert with RCW reporting). These reports will include details on any habitat and land management activities proposed management/maintenance activities for the following year. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) The bald eagle was removed from the FWS Endangered Species List in August 2007 and the FWC Imperiled List in 2008. However, the bald eagle is still protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The FDEP permit issued for the Collier County Resource Recovery Park contained Special Listed Species Permit Condition #19, which stated:" If an eagle nest is identified onsite during clearing or construction, the Permittee shall refer to the FWC Bald Eagle Management Guidelines found at http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/bald-eagle/. V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 390 of 745 Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) The Florida black bear was officially removed from the list of State Designated Threatened species in 2012 and is not listed by the FWS. The FWC approved the Florida Black Bear Management Plan on December 11, 2019, which addresses complex and sometimes contentious issues surrounding human - bear interactions such as garbage and other attractants, bears injuring people, people feeding bears, and population management. The FDEP permit issued for the Collier County Resource Recovery Park contained Special Listed Species Permit Condition #20, which stated: "To avoid contact with bears, the Permittee shall install fencing around the entire project area. The FWC encourages the use of electric fencing as a suitable tool that has proven effective in deterring bears from entering the property (design recommendations attached). See FWC Design Recommendations Exhibit F. V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 391 of 745 EXHIBITS V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\del iverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 392 of 745 V:v:121561active122704467011environmental105_report_delivldeliverablelmem_of_findi ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 393 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY BUSINESS PARK Stantec PL20150002737 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LISTED SPECIES EXHIBIT B V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\del iverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 394 of 745 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LISTED SPECIES RED COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis) BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL (Sciurus nigerovicennia) EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE (Drymarchon corais couperi) GOPHER TORTOISE (Gopherus polyphemus) Project: COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Location: Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East (26°10'27.35"N; 81°39'43.93"W) Prepared for: W„�.FPe U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) South Florida Ecological Services Field Office 1339 20th Street ' Vero Beach, FL 32960 FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FWC) Office of Conservation Planning Services 620 South Meridian Street E) Tallahassee, FL 32399 Date: November 26, 2012 Revised: December 18, 2012 Prepared by: 2223 Trade Center Way a•c- Naples, FL34109 (239)265-3222 11000 Metro Parkway Boylan l Environmental '' Fort Myers, FL 33966 Consultants, in (239) 418-0671 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 395 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of onsite management activities proposed for implementation on the Collier County Resource Recovery Park site. Management activities will take place within the proposed preserve areas and will benefit a number of listed species, including Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides Borealis), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus Niger Avicennia), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymorchon Corais Couperi), And Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus). PROJECT LOCATION The Collier County Resource Recovery Park site is located in portions of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is situated north of the Collier County landfill, east of the Golden Gate Canal\Golden Gate Estates Unit 28, south of the Hideout golf course, and west of Garland Road. See Figure 1 below. -11-t--H Figure 1. Site Location. Page 2 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_delivldeliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 396 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of Resource Recovery Park is to construct a collection and transfer site adjacent to the existing landfill that will provide for resource recovery and recycling. Specifically, the solid waste recovery facility will include handling and/or processing of materials such as tires, glass, paper, plastics, storm debris, construction debris, and construction demolition debris. Processing of these materials will keep them in the recycle stream and prevent them from being buried within the landfill. The proposed project is being constructed to extend the life of the existing landfill through recycling and diversion. Construction and operation of the proposed facility will serve to extend the projected life span of the existing landfill operation. Currently, existing materials collected in the County that qualify for recycling are shipped to Pembroke Pines for processing. Having this facility in Collier County will serve to reduce costs and environmental impacts of shipping these materials across the State. MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW LAND PROTECTION A Conservation Easement will be placed over the preserved lands and granted to Florida Department of Environmental Protection with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) included as a third party to the agreement. Areas currently within the existing well field easement or FPL Easements will not be subject to the conservation easement, since these areas will remain following construction. INITIAL MAINTENANCE AND MITIGATION ACTIVITIES Collier County will be responsible for 5 years following the initial exotic removal and site preparation activities, external fencing of the property, burn plans and prescribed burn activities, mowing, vegetative monitoring, and wildlife monitoring. The initial exotic removal and maintenance schedule, including burn and mowing activities, may be phased within the preserve to stagger burn and maintenance activities. Phase 1 will begin with the western half of areas north of the well field access road. These areas include the intensely managed RCW Management and Gopher tortoise recipient area. LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE Collier County will be responsible for long term management activities, with the assistance of Conservation Collier, FWC, or FWS to implement and manage prescribed burns, mowing, exotic removal and maintenance as needed. Annual costs will be estimated following the initial maintenance activities to set up an escrow account or similar financial mechanism to ensure that the costs of management the lands in perpetuity will be met. Page 3 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 397 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The Resource Recovery Park Site has the following surrounding land uses: West Golden Gate Canal North Hideout Golf Course South Undeveloped Lands, Collier County Landfill East Garland Road, Low Density Residential Vegetation Community Summary Table (Existing) FLUCFCS Code7Pine Cailmmu-1t Acreag 411ods 0.12±ac. 411E1ods (1-24% Exotics) 149.32±ac. 411E2ods (25-49% Exotics) 3.69± ac. 411E3ods (50-74% Exotics) 1.55± ac. 428 lm 3.03±ac. 428E1 abbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 18.70± ac. 428H abbage Palm, Hydric 5.08±ac. 428HE1 abbagePalm, Hydric (1-24% Exotics) 6.16± ac. 435E1 urned Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) 9.39± ac. 621E4 "ypress wetlands (75-99% Exotics) 1.28± ac. 624E1 :ypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 122.97±ac. 624E2 ypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (25-49% Exotics) 9.34± ac. 832H PL Utility Easement, Hydric 0.87± ac. 833 ellfield and Associated Roads 12.72± ac. - 344.22± ac. (Figure 2) shows the current FLUCFCS breakdown on the property: Page 4 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 398 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species N nrcau.� rai .i p�nu main o..n�..: wa �. ra a'n pn..n: ,..a...., COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK r+ izga FLUCFCS MAP Figure 2. Existing Conditions FLUCSFCS mapping (Wetlands are hatched). Based on the FLUCFCS system, the following is a description of each community currently present on the property: 411 Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) (0.12± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 0.12± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Sub -canopy includes minimal Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), cabbage palm (Sabol palmetto) and Guiana myrsine (Myrsine guianensis). Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), cabbage palm, saw grass (Cladium jamoicense), Bahia grass (Paspalum notatum), and Caesar weed (Urena lobata). 411E1 Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) (149.32±acres) This upland habitat type occupies 149.32± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Sub -canopy includes minimal Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and Guiana myrsine (Myrsine guianensis). Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, saw Pages of 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 399 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species palmetto (Serenoo repens), cabbage palm, saw grass (Cladium jamoicense), Bahia grass (Paspalum notatum), and Caesar weed (Urena loboto). 411E2 Pine Flatwoods (25-49% Exotics) (3.69± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 3.69± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine. Sub -canopy and ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia, Guiana myrsine, and cabbage palm. Ground cover also includes Caesar weed, smilax (Smilaxsp.), and grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia). 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50-74% Exotics) (1.55± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 1.55± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine. Sub -canopy includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia, and cabbage palm. Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia saw palmetto, Caesar weed, and smilax. 428 Cabbage Palm (3.03± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 3.03± acres of the property. The canopy and sub - canopy contain cabbage palm. The ground cover includes wild coffee and beauty -berry. 428E1 Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) (18.70± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 18.70± acres of the property. The canopy and sub - canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, smilax, Caesar weed and beauty -berry. 428H Cabbage Palm, Hvdric (5.08± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 5.08± acres of the property. This area was recently burned and the vegetation community has slightly changed, leaning to a more upland community. The canopy and sub -canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags, Brazilian pepper, and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, and beauty -berry. 428HE1 Hvdric Cabbage Palm (6.16± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 6.16± acres of the property. This area was recently burned and the vegetation community has slightly changed, leaning to a more upland community. The canopy and sub -canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags, Brazilian pepper, and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, and beauty -berry. 435E1 Burned Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) (9.39± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 9.39± acres of the property. Due to a recent burn, the canopy and understory are open. The canopy contains sparse slash pine, live oak, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains some cabbage palm. The ground cover is sparse and includes Bahia grass, Caesar weed, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. Page 6 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 400 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species 621E4 Cypress Wetlands (75-99% Exotics) (1.28± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 1.28± acres of the property. The canopy is dominated by cypress. The sub -canopy contains cypress, Brazilian pepper, swamp bay (Persea palustris), Earleaf acacia, dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), Guiana myrsine and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). The ground cover includes swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), Caesar weed, grapevine, and Earleaf acacia. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 624E1 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) (122.97± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 122.97± acres of the property. The canopy contains slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and Earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper, small cypress, wax myrtle, coco plum, myrsine, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes smilax, grape vine, saw grass, Caesar weed. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 624E2 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm (25-49% Exotics) (9.34± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 9.34± acres of the property. The canopy contains slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and Earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper, small cypress, wax myrtle, coco plum, myrsine, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes smilax, grape vine, saw grass, Caesar weed. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 832H FPL Utility Easement, Hydric (0.87± acres) This area is occupied by Florida Power and Light electrical transmission lines and roadways. It accounts for 0.87± acres of the property. 833 Wellfield and Associated Roads (12.72± acres) This area is occupied by a large County well field and accounts for 12.72± acres of the property. It includes access roads, pump stations, and utilities. Page 7 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 401 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS AFTER DEVELOPMENT Ffgure 3. Port Development Candlilons FLUCSFCti mapping. Vegetation Community Summary Table (Post Development) 'C4rtimunl Existing Acreage Devi -loped Preserved 411 Pine Flatwoods 0.12±Ac 0.121Ac 0.00±Ac 411E1 Pine Flatwoods (I-24%Exotics) 149.32±Ac 84.53±Ac 64.79±Ac 411E2 Pine Flatwoods (25-49%Exotics) 3.69±Ac 1.83±Ac 1.86±Ac 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50-74% Exotics) 1.55±Ac 0.00i Ac 1.55±Ac 428 :Cabbage Palm 3.03±Ac 0.00±Ac 3.03±Ac 428E1 Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 18.70±Ac 18.70±Ac 0.00±Ac 428H Cabbage Palm, Hydric 5.08±Ac 0.00±Ac 5.08±Ac 428HE1 Cabbage Palm, Hydric (1-24%Exotics) 6.16±Ac 6.16±Ac 0.00±Ac 435E1 Burned Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) 9.39±Ac 9.39±Ac 0.00±Ac 621E4 Cypresswetlands (75-99%Exotics) 1.28±Ac O.00±Ac 1.28±Ac 624E1 Prne,Cypress, Cabbage Palm (1-24%Exotics) 122.97±Ac 29.64±Ac 93.33±Ac 624E2 Pirte,Cypress,CabbagePalm (25-49%Exotics) 9.34±Ac 4.34±Ac 5.00±Ac 832H FPL Easement, Hydric 0.87±Ac 0.00±Ac 0.97±Ac 833 Wellfieldwith Associated Roads 12.72±Ac 0.00±Ac 12.72±Ac 344.22± Ac 154.71± Ac 189.51± Ac Page 8 or 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\del iverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 402 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan For Listed Species MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES BY SPECIES The following section provides biology and proposed management activities for each affected species. Red Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Biology The RCW is listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (Sullivan 2004, 35 Federal Register [FR) 16047). The RCW is 8.5 inches long with black and white horizontal stripes on its back and a large unbroken white cheek {patch (Jackson 1994). It has a black cap and stripe on each side of the black cap. Adult males weigh about 1.6 ounces and may be distinguished from females by the presence of a small tuft of red feathers (cockade) on the sides of the head. Adult females weigh less than males averaging 1.48 ounces (City Gate HCP). RCWs forage on pine trees for insects, spiders, and other invertebrates. For foraging, they use a variety of pine species throughout their range. In this region of Florida, RCWs spend about 10% of their foraging time in cypress habitats and the remainder on pines. Females forage more frequently on theT-A bole (trunk), while males make greater use of the limbs, cones,and twigs. Thus, males forage higher in the tree compared tofemales. Both sexes forage primarily on trees greater than 15 years of age and 4 inches or larger in diameter. Larger and older pines are preferred foraging sites, although foraging may occur on younger pines (City Gate HCP). Project Region The occurrence of RCWs in the vicinity of County Road 951 was first evaluated by the FWC in the late 1980s and included about 27 occupied clusters. Since then that population has declined and now accounts for about 8% of the south Florida woodpecker groups extending from Avon Park to the Big Cypress National Preserve (BCNP) (Wood and Wenner 1983; DeLotelle 2004) (Figure 4). The population on the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF) has increased recently as a result of cavity augmentation and bird translocation (DeLotelle, Folk). (Figure 4) details the current RCW clusters within the BCNP, PSSF, and the North Belle Meade (NBM). Page 9 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 403 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species w Aa b INK A AA [7� Figure 4. Existing RCW Cluster Locations in BCNP, PSSF, & NBM. Past management practices in the Naples area using small, on -site preserves and limited management appear to have been a failure as indicated by the population declines observed in the 1990s, including the complete extirpation of groups west of Collier Boulevard. (City Gate HCP). Within the vicinity of the Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP), there are four (4) remaining active RCW clusters in the North Belle Meade (NBM). (Figure 5) shows the CCRRP's location in relation to the clusters in the NBM. The Hideout cluster located approximately one mile north of the property has a roosting male RCW, but has produced no breeding activity. Three clusters, the Rocco cluster, the Hussey East, and Hussey West are breeding clusters that have produced fledglings in recent years. As part of a 2009 Incidental Take Permit, the final RCW located on the City Gate property to the west of the CCRRP was relocated to the PSSF. Page 10 of 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 404 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species i 4pre S. Existing RCW must=r Locations in Project Vicinity. The CCRRP site and its vicinity have been extensively surveyed for cavity trees in an effort to locate additional breeding clusters in the NBM. No additional cavities have been observed on the subject property or its vicinity in annual surveys conducted by DeLotelle & Guthrie going back to 2003 and most recently by Wild Folk, Ecotone Environmental, and Boylan Environmental Consultants. All parties are confident that the property does not contain inactive or active RCW cavity trees. Project Impacts The CCRRP property does contain approximately 164.06 acres of pine flatwoods, 132.31 acres of mixed pine and cypress or cypress communities that likely provide foraging habitat for RCW clusters located to the north and east of the site. Most of the potential foraging habitat on the property is of very low quality for RCW. Mid -story and groundcover are dense and severely overgrown with a mix of cabbage palm, pine saplings, myrsine, and various exotics such as Brazilian pepper and ear leaf acacia. Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Activities For mitigation for impacts to low quality RCW foraging habitat, the applicant is proposing mitigation onsite. Approximately 166.53 acres of low quality foraging habitat will be preserved onsite (approximately 68.20 acres of pine flatwoods, 98.33 acres of mixed pine and cypress). Page 11 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 405 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Usted Species The intent is to manage these habitats for RCW in order to transform them into quality foraging habitat and the pine flatwoods into potential nesting habitat. The following is a basic framework for what the onsite work for RCW management will include: See (Figure 6) for specific locations. 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (USFWS 2003) are met. 5. Installing and maintaining artificial cavities within the pine flatwoods, which are currently unoccupied nesting habitat. The proposed preserve on the CCRRP is perfectly situated between the isolated RCW group on the Conservation Collier Nancy Payton preserve to the north and the City Gate mitigation parcel cluster (ROCCO) to the east. Establishing a new nesting group at this location would provide roosting and nesting cavities for fledglings from the RCW groups in the North Belle Meade which would otherwise have no place to roost within NBM (Monica Folk, personal communication). {YELLOVh W;,9/ RECRUIT6IEIA %VSTEA LOCATIC.1 4 :f.�FEF TORTOISE RELOCATION APEA .F;'RGX OAORES ;SICST :it" THINNING yl-LING RE4 -NA..L .X;3';?!9E0 9URII`:G r,A7 FICLkL GM ! INSTALLATION Page 12 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 406 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Figure 6. Management Activities Overview. All of these activities will provide an immediate RCW net conservation benefit and will benefit all the other species outlined in this plan. The following is a more detailed description of each activity: 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. The initial mitigation activities for the CCRRP Preserves will include the eradication of melaleuca and other exotic vegetation as identified by FLEPPC 2012. The limits of the preserve areas will be flagged in the field prior to exotic removal activities. Eradication methods will consist of mechanical removal, cutting and stump treatment of all woody exotic species, foliar treatment of all saplings and/or herbaceous exotics species, and/or hand pulling. All treated woody vegetation will either be stacked within the preserve, mulched in place, and/or removed from preserve. A technician that is licensed to apply herbicide in natural and aquatic areas by Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) will supervise activities. All tree stumps that are cut and ground with the machinery will be treated with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved herbicide and visual tracer dye. Any accumulated trash and refuse will be hand removed from preserve area. For areas requiring mechanical removal, a low ground pressure posi-track will be utilized to mechanically remove exotic vegetation to limit soil disturbance. A mulched layer will remain to limit exotic regrowth from exposed open areas. Mechanical eradication will be utilized in areas where exotic vegetation exceeds 50% coverage. Mechanical clearing limits will be flagged in the field. Areas mechanically cleared of exotics will be re - contoured to natural grade if necessary. Mechanical work will be conducted only during times of dry soil conditions to minimize ground disturbance. Mechanical clearing limits may vary as a result of soil conditions or other limiting factors. All areas to be mechanically cleared of exotic vegetation will follow the same pre -construction clearing procedures outlined above in order to protect potential fox squirrel nests. Removal of these invasive plant species will reduce existing fuel loads and thereby temperature of the initial prescribed fire, and make possible the restoration of the natural fire regime to these habitats and benefit a multitude of plant and animal species, particularly the RCW and the Florida panther, but also the white-tailed deer (0docoileus virginianus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), and other upland fauna. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. Page 13 of 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 407 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species With DOF assistance, a fire management plan will be created. If necessary it will be coordinated with other local qualified agencies for review and approval. Due to the existing County well field that surrounds the proposed prescribed burn area, extensive coordination with Collier County Public Utilities will be necessary. The plan must include the following elements: purpose and measurable objectives, description of the burn unit, map of the burn unit, weather factors, safety concerns, fuel conditions, season and time of day, smoke screening, publicity, legal requirements, firing plan, equipment and personnel, contingencies, control and mop -up, declaring the fire out and evaluation and monitoring. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. The perimeter of the proposed burn unit (as shown in Figure 6) is clearly delineated by the surrounding well easements. Fire lines may be necessary to break the proposed burn area into more manageable pieces or to protect pump areas and well equipment. Before clearing any vegetation, permits must be received from the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Department. A gopher tortoise and updated species survey will be done prior to any vegetation clearing or reduction. Fire lines will be installed utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. Fire breaks will be disked or mulched down to soil and will go around all mature pine trees; they will be a maximum of 8-10 feet wide. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (USFWS 2003) are met. Reduce coverage of overgrown mid story vegetation, including pine saplings, cabbage palm, and excessively tall saw palmetto. Goals will be to mechanically or manually reduce cabbage palms to approximately 4 per acre and within 100 feet of potential cavity trees before any controlled burn. Saw palmetto greater than 3 feet in height or that surround potential cavity trees should be reduced before any controlled burn. Reduction may be accomplished by manual or mechanical means and may include thinning of diseased pine trees through logging. S. Installing and maintaining artificial cavities within the pine flatwoods, which are currently unoccupied nesting habitat. The proposed preserve on the CCRRP is perfectly situated between the isolated RCW group on the Conservation Collier Nancy Payton preserve to the north and the City Gate mitigation parcel cluster (ROCCO) to the east. Establishing a new nesting group at this location would provide roosting and nesting cavities for fledglings from the RCW groups Page 14 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 408 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan For Listed Species in the North Belle Meade which would otherwise have no place to roost within NBM (Monica Folk, personal communication). A new recruitment cluster on the CCRRP property will be established in the area of pine flatwoods outlined in yellow on (Figure Selection of specific trees and cavity installation would be completed by a contractor approved for artificial cavity installation. At least 4 artificial cavities will be installed in suitable slash pine within the preserve. 6. Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring of the recruitment cluster will be conducted during the reproductive season (April -July), late summer (August -September) and mid -winter (January -February) for five years following cavity installation. The cluster will be resurveyed to determine the number and status (occupied, abandoned, and start -hole tree) of each cavity tree. Each cavity will be visually inspected to determine if RCWs are using it. Maintenance may be required on cavities that leak or contain debris from other species. A Treetop II Nest Peeper will be used to inspect cavities for leaks or use by other species at least once a year. All cavity trees will be marked with white paint, new identification numbers, and located by Global Positioning System for proper documentation. Any cavities that leak or have otherwise deteriorated will be replaced. Additional cleanup will be conducted around new replacement cavity trees as needed. Annual Property Data Reports will be submitted to the RCW Recovery Coordinator at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These reports will include details on any habitat and land management activities, nesting activity, and proposed management activites for the following year. These details will be incorporated in to the Monitoring Plan for site as noted in the Monitoring p Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Biology The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) is one of three fox squirrel sub -species found in Florida. It weighs approximately one to three pounds and averages 13 inches in body length (minus tail length). Their bushy tail can be up to 14 inches long. This size makes them noticeably larger than the more common gray squirrel. Fox squirrels are highly variable in color; from tan and reddish orange to black. Often the nose, front toes, and ear tips are white. Range It generally ranges south of the Caloosahatchee River and is classified as Threatened by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 409 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Habitat Primary habitats for the big cypress fox squirrel are open pine flatwoods, cypress strands, broad -leaf evergreen hammocks, mangroves, and oak forest. More urban habitats may include golf courses and residential areas with native vegetation. Fox squirrels spend a significant amount of time on the ground foraging for pine seeds, cypress balls, and cabbage palm or palmetto berries, thus an open understory is critical. optimal habitat for a fox squirrel has an open park -like quality. Life History Fox Squirrels are usually active during the day and build nests not only for breeding, but for resting or sleeping. Leaf or stripped bark nests may be found in pines, cypress, cabbage palms, and melaleuca. They may also nest in tree hollows and bromeliad clusters. Litters of approximately 2 to 4 young are produced each year. The young are weaned at about 2 to 3 months of age. Protect Impacts No Big Cypress fox squirrels or signs of fox squirrels were observed on the subject property. The development area of the project will be cleared for construction so precautions will be taken in the event that fox squirrels are present on the property at that time. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Activities The main focus of this management plan is to prevent incidental take of fox squirrel nests during construction activities and to maintain Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat within the preserves on the property after it is developed. This will be accomplished through a series of pre -construction precautionary activities and by preserving suitable habitat onsite and enhancing it through exotic removal. Pre -Construction Precautions: In order to prevent incidental take of fox squirrel nests during construction activities the following precautions will be taken: The limits of the preserves will be flagged or otherwise marked in the field prior to any construction activities. Immediately prior to any construction or clearing, the area slated for development will be re -surveyed for fox squirrel nests. If no nests are found, the clearing will be allowed to commence. If any nests are observed, buffers of 125 feet will maintained around each nest tree until the nests are found to be inactive or abandoned. In order to consider the nest inactive or abandoned, it will be observed on 3 consecutive days during the morning or evening hours. If no squirrels or sign of activity are documented in the 3 days, FWC will be contacted and the tree containing the nest will be removed and the clearing of the area will commence. Preservation and Enhancement: The proposed preserve\enhancement areas are shown in Figure 6. Specific enhancement activities are outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above. Page 16 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 410 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Perpetual Management: Management activities will ensure that all preserve areas are maintained free of exotic plants in perpetuity. This is achieved by establishing a scheduled program to maintain the site free of exotic plants. The preserves will be evaluated on an annual or semi-annual basis for exotic vegetation. Exotics will be removed as necessary to ensure that exotic species will constitute no more than 0 percent of total cover. Any future changes to the fox squirrel management activities outlined above will be submitted to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for approval prior to implementation. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarciron Corais Couperi) Biology (Excerpt taken from City Gate HCP, 2009) The eastern indigo snake is listed as threatened by the FWC and as threatened by the USFWS (Sullivan 2004, 43 FR 4028). The eastern indigo snake is the longest North American snake, reaching 102 inches in length. The overall coloration is iridescent black, with a throat varying in color from red to white. Currently, only Georgia and Florida support eastern indigo snake populations, although there are historical records for Mississippi, Alabama, and southern South Carolina. Although, occurring in all 67 Florida counties, this snake is local in its distribution occurring only in suitable habitat areas (Moler 1992). This species may be found in a range of habitats (wetlands to uplands) and home ranges can be as large as 247 acres. It frequently uses the burrows of gopher tortoises as winter shelters although less so in central and south Florida. Breeding occurs from November to April with eggs (n = 5 - 10) laid in May or June. Eastern indigo snakes feed on a variety of vertebrate species, including the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus). The decline of this species is the result of over collection for the pet trade and habitat degradation and fragmentation. No eastern indigo snakes were observed on the project site. Project Impacts No eastern indigo snakes have been observed on site, but they may occur in association with gopher tortoise burrows or in other habitats on the site. Indigo snakes are relatively secretive by nature and usually occur in low density; so their visibility is low. The surveys of likely habitat and for tortoises revealed no indigo snakes. Eastern Indigo Snake Management Activities The CCRRP will follow the standard protection measures for the eastern indigo snake as outlined below. STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE 1. An eastern indigo snake protection/education plan shall be developed by the applicant or requestor for all construction personnel to follow. The plan shall be provided to the Service for Page 17 of 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 411 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species review and approval at least 30 days prior to any clearing activities. The educational materials for the plan may consist of a combination of posters, videos, pamphlets, and lectures (e.g., an observer trained to identify eastern indigo snakes could use the protection/education plan to instruct construction personnel before any clearing activities occur). Informational signs should be posted throughout the construction site and along any proposed access road to contain the following information: a. a description of the eastern indigo snake, its habits, and protection under Federal Law; b. instructions not to injure, harm, harass or kill this species; c. directions to cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site on its own before resuming clearing; and, d. telephone numbers of pertinent agencies to be contacted if a dead eastern indigo snake is encountered. The dead specimen should be thoroughly soaked in water and then frozen. 2. If not currently authorized through an Incidental Take Statement in association with a Biological Opinion, only individuals who have been either authorized by a section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the Service, or by the State of Florida through the Florida Fish Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for such activities, are permitted to come in contact with an eastern indigo snake. 3. An eastern indigo snake monitoring report must be submitted to the appropriate Florida Field Office within 60 days of the conclusion of clearing phases. The report should be submitted whether or not eastern indigo snakes are observed. The report should contain the following information: a. any sightings of eastern indigo snakes and b. other obligations required by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, as stipulated in the permit. Prior to clearing activities, a pre -construction meeting will be held with contractors. A sign (Figure 7) will be posted in the construction area (at the construction trailer or permit board) and each worker will be provided with an informational brochure similar to (Figure 8): Page 18 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 412 of 745 EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE PROJECT: PROTECTION PLAN COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK DATE: NOVEMBER26,2012 IDENTIFICATION The East— inogo Snake is the largest nunpwsorous snake m Nwth Andre The amage see is approx�malcly G fmt in lNgfF .11hah—ybu14 nseunilorm shiny blue-hlackwfth the crvna na ly bOrm Ip red Wm The Indigo snakes often confused vnlh the much more eorrerron spulhernblack racer TheblackracegenerallyadWldr rdW bla lk wilh8whde dFn soda sientler h build Its last mowug entl suck lo+etreat EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE mymal —rya cwpan WHAT TO DO IF YOU OBSERVE AN EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THIS SRE: 1. Cease all construction activities immediately. 2. Notify the onsite construction supervisor and contact the project biologist: ECOTONEEHYIaoala -k (2]112W3222 or F iTFeM1and Sd,3ill lwnCw roman 3511 iaiflam Td SWa 31f1 Punta Gorda. FL JJaSp OMad Stain FM uA WIUaa SaMu Oulu tl Fcdopul SarnaF 123a13532er3 3. Leave the snake unharmed and allow it sufficient time to move away from construction activities on its own. 4. Once the biologist confirmed the snake is out of harms way, construction acliwlies can resume. COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species COMMON BLACK RACER Figure 7. Example Indigo Snake Informational Sign to be Posted at Construction Site. Page 19 of 24 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 413 of 745 Contacts: In — of a sighting of Eastern Indtga snalm duringg cons truction contact orw d the fallowing: Ecotone Ent4rostnterrtal (239) 205.3222 lermy Stab U.S. Fhh and VAdIKa Seryke (299) 353-78A Florida FW and MRIdlffa Conse ocoon Carnmhslon 3941 Tamfttml Tra1L Suite 3M Panda Coda, FIL 33950 The Eastern Indigo Snare c .Mbt.W-a-6.In d. &d awD b 1M lerard.edw ti Ja4t.d 9da Mb.erftbnan &wolbtti a-"& fnda dill bka lochb Hd.Ld.F — a Fran bdePada. ti Ra w.. thr rmfan bh. dpo •.h.I.0 b.ar wa Pdma b— .... ..b a4 cap. a.d6 ayA. S.6. q hd .d Wth. rd N tlreFlan k.0"ft-d W. caw rotn.td..a.dwda.d dtlasamlde qil ed ttld tl. tu. Fhb adttnaor. SSir ratan Mi90 snob¢ h Pin pml.d.d ud. th. rasma..d Specie• Ad d1F13. 11ae b a perdW fe Mi.ebe b W land on+ka Basic Facts PhF.Hd t,—Aption: ih. Eataa k.%. b. mn rFd a le a reef in Ix.lh. They en failed mlv.d a play hlucWmb with fhe chin a rmly boon b nd cWor. H.hltd: btM SMh..LRbfe.d1nPm RWwod. 4.hey om od Palnlrm imdt ry wda.11tgabo RJa M t1Rha letdpbareunb Mauna NabtM1: n nesmatarmmN LV tFebrvery with hatcfi11,lings app.atde..b tth iY to. Omobr. Feeding H.bRs: TM Et— kb. vd . beroblha as rood with. few,hPW mhWt.nrb mman� WM1 ,, other ..abet and limrdx The E.dern Indigo snake is mt—tomats. &ateaG C c add 4¢ m3 Tn*. rL Wy 34 Napfm, FL 3dla9 a .ardewelvmn *Ccotone nvsl tali m+:.r.1.:1 What to do if you See an Eastern Indigo Snake on this site H on rot—bd.o ". biddd dab. mr.adlal, tM fabwf. — dot b. tahae g stm er�.dsa.adt.Rvtilla a.w d Ra iplfb. b.n.adN D tiotYy tt. Emtvw Fanimrlvdd binl.-1 —.Wmd.baddd.b.&— s) Abev tlaemtan k.ap..dw .dRdf[ u,. m mea atay Wool Ma menme„rtde.l..af. mmhadbn EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE atNafebmm , COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan For Listed Species THE EASTERI` INDIGO SNAKE Le al Information for Contractors 7M Emtan kdp. Sde h pe.t.d.d ba lMh cab and Flaal p.Rldaaars R b aepd m hmvm bona — Wu L ieaLa�aud.4a. .0"hap, Cant-%mQ d, hmmarLa Wanrpt b n.app bt arN nab [ardutt dmbdsabdr m""wd1t erda ePPtY toMf..ak PebMin ns d m 11W rdr e.pp. Ursa Paata W, taalm Ada+*OW . God. Sa-.AW th.P tla earn W—. P.wdA".e.--W d.ew mhdvn.ea. oidr w b fSao op Ilya etdla.o de br.rbmnld la&*.ff va mkkd.d Pad1Y ardta. Und. U. End—W Sp.do Kt Ma padtdm m bdbar.ad a.d 3adfgticasPadM - admadran fN. dSSo,aaaloo erldMIbvnadb Wb t t+e fe obMd.Iotdvva F m.im.d COMMON BLACK RACER Cabfaaaddde Figure 8. Example Indigo Snake Informational Brochure. Page 20 of 24 V:021561active122704467011envi ronmental105_report_delMdel iverablehem_of_findi ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 414 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan For Listed Species Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus potyphemus) Biology (Excerpt taken from City Gate HCP, 2009) The gopher tortoise is listed as a species of special concern by the FWC (Sullivan 2004) and federally listed in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama (52 FIR 25376). This large terrestrial turtle can reach lengths up to 38 cm and is tan!>n'• or brown in overall coloration. The gopher R tortoise occurs throughout the southeastern _ -- coastal plain in appropriate habitat (Diemer t• 1992). The gopher tortoise is extant in all 67 r counties of Florida; although, numbers are '� ! " declining, especially in the southern peninsula t where their distribution is limited and fragmented by unsuitable habitat and increasing urbanization. The tortoise occupies habitats with well -drained loose soil in which to excavate burrows, a low herbaceous ground cover for forage (e.g., fire -maintained), and open sunlit sites for placing nests. Typical habitats include sandhill, scrub, dry pine flatwoods, and disturbed habitats. The gopher tortoise digs extensive burrows, which provides refuge for 300 invertebrate and 60 vertebrate species. Gopher tortoises breed from mid -May to mid -June. One clutch, averaging six eggs, is produced annually and the incubation period varies from 80 to 110 days. Gopher tortoises are herbivores, which forage on a variety of grasses, legumes and fruits. Habitat destruction is the primary threat to the gopher tortoise; however, a respiratory disease has recently become an important threat, too. Project Impacts A species survey was originally conducted in January and February, 2012. The site contained approximately 10 active it inactive and 4 abandoned burrows. Construction of the project's main water management lake will require impacts to tortoise burrows. A permit to relocate impacted tortoises will be acquired which will allow any tortoises impacted within the development footprint to be relocated into the upland preserve area located in the northwest portion of the preserve. Gopher tortoises not impacted by development will remain. This area is proposed to be preserved, and will have active land management that will benefit the habitat of the tortoise. No construction activities will take place in this area. Gopher Tortoise Management Activities Pre -Construction Prior to relocation activities, management and enhancement activities as outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above will occur to prepare the recipient area for the tortoise. Once a relocation permit has been acquired, the property will be resurveyed for gopher tortoises no longer than 4 weeks prior to site clearing. The recipient area within the upland Page 21 or 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 415 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species preserve area will be staked. Installation of the temporary tortoise fencing will be installed prior to construction. Chicken wire will be installed and a portion of the fence will be trenched underground. The silt fence will be installed to the outside of the chicken wire. Following installation of the fencing, the area will be re -inspected by county staff, and then a vegetation permit for minor clearing to excavate the tortoises will be issued. Excavation and Relocation The physical relocation will be done by a qualified Gopher Tortoise Agent and will occur as follows: A flexible hose will be snaked down the burrow in order to track the direction of the burrow. A backhoe will carefully excavate soil material until just before reaching the burrow. Excavation will then occur manually to ensure no injury to the tortoise. All captured tortoises will be measured and their scutes will be notched according to the prearranged numbering system per the recipient site requirements, and then placed in crates and moved over to the gopher tortoise on -site recipient area. In addition, commensal species within burrows will also be safely relocated to the on -site preserve. If any Eastern indigo Snakes are encountered, they will be allowed to vacate the area prior to continuation of work. Note: "tortoises shall not be captured / relocated on days for which the overnight low temperature for that day and the two consecutive days thereafter is forecasted by the U.S. National Weather Service to be below 50"F. This 3-day window of milder overnight temperatures is to allow the relocated tortoises to settle into the recipient site". Post -Construction When construction on -site is completed, the tortoise fence will be removed. On -site Gopher Tortoise Preserve Area Management 1. Exotic Vegetation Removal, Non-native Vegetation, and Nuisance or Invasive Plant Control The proposed preserve\enhancement areas are shown in Figure 6. Specific enhancement activities are outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above. 2. Maintenance: The tortoise preserve area will be walked and inspected at least once yearly for the presence of exotic vegetation. Every two years the preserve will be evaluated for manual trimming. Preserve trimming shall be conducted prior to the start of the rainy season; this will promote new growth of the recently trimmed material. Trimming will only occur as necessary to maintain the open space required for the gopher tortoises inhabiting the preserve area. The maintenance program will be conducted in perpetuity. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the developer, or their successor. The tortoise preserve area shall be maintained in its natural state and must be kept free of refuse and debris. Page 22 o[ 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_delivldeliverablelmem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 416 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species PHASING OF MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES The initial exotic removal and maintenance schedule, including burn and mowing activities, may be phased within the preserve to stagger burn and maintenance activities. Phase 1 will include western half of areas north of the well field access road. These areas include the intensely managed RCW Management and Gopher tortoise recipient area. Phase 2 will include the remaining wetlands on the eastern half of the preserve located north of the well field access road. Phase 3 will include the upland and wetland areas south of the well field access road and adjacent to the development area. It is anticipated Phase 3 would be initiated following initial clearing of the development boundary for access purposes. TIMING AND SCHEDULING The following is a more detailed description of the timing each activity as it relates to the project construction: 1. Monitoring and Reporting a.) Vegetative Monitoring - Baseline monitoring will occur prior to the onset of any management activities. The Time -zero monitoring report for the management activities will be completed within 60 days of the completion of exotic removal. Annual reports will be submitted following the Time -zero for 5 years or until the goals of the mitigation activities have been met. b.) Wildlife Monitoring — Prior to site clearing, a Gopher Tortoise Survey will be conducted over the development area. In addition, a Fox Squirrel nest survey will be conducted prior to clearing; to determine is any actively nesting Fox Squirrels are present within the clearing area. c.) Semi-annual RCW Monitoring Surveys will be conducted in accordance with the FWS Protocol during both the breeding season (April 15-June 15) and the non - nesting season or fall (October 15- December 15) following installation of the artificial cavities. Reports will be submitted following the completion of each Survey event. 2. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. The initial mitigation activities for the CCRRP Preserves will include the eradication of melaleuca and other exotic vegetation as identified by FLEPPC 2012. This activity is anticipated to commence upon receipt of all development approvals and prior to commencement of construction. Maintenance events will occur at a minimum of twice a year after initial treatment, and continue for a minimum of five years. If vegetative monitoring data shows additional treatments are necessary, the maintenance and exotic removal schedule may be revised to increase the number of events until target Page 23 of 24 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 417 of 745 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \envi ron mental\05_report_del iv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 418 of 745 EXHIBIT D ATTENTION: THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES MAY BE PRESENT ON THIS SITE! ! ! IF YOU SEE A LIVE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site without interference. • Personnel must NOT attempt to touch or handle snake due to protected status. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • If the snake is located in a vicinity where continuation of the clearing or construction activities will cause harm to the snake, the activities must haft until such time that a representative of the USFWS returns the call (within one day) with further guidance as to when activities may resume. IF YOU SEE A DEAD EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Thoroughly soak the dead snake in water and then freeze the specimen. The appropriate wildlife agency will retrieve the dead snake. USFWS Florida Field Offices to be contacted if a live or dead eastern indigo snake is encountered: North Florida Field Office — (904) 731-3336 Panama City Field Office — (850) 769-0552 South Florida Field Office — (772) 562-3909 Killing, harming, or harassing indigo Snakes is strictly prohibited and punishable under State and Federal Law. DESCRIPTION: The eastern indigo snake is one of the largest non -venomous snakes in North America, with individuals often reaching up to 8 feet 1n length. They derive their name from the glossy, blue -black color of their scales above and uniformly slate blue below, Frequently, they have orange to coral reddish coloration in the throat area, yet some specimens have been reported to only have cream coloration on the throat. These snakes are not typically aggressive and will attempt to crawl away when disturbed. Though indigo snakes rarely bite, they should NOT be handled. SIMILAR SNAKES: The black racer is the only other solid black snake resembling the eastern indigo snake. However, black racers have a white or cream chin, thinner bodies, and WILL BITE if handled. LIFE HISTORY: The eastern indigo snake occurs in a wide variety of terrestrial habitat types throughout Florida. Although they have a preference for uplands, they also utilize some wetlands and agricultural areas. Eastern indigo snakes will often seek shelter inside gopher tortoise burrows and other below- and above- ground refugia, such as other animal burrows, stumps, roots, and debris piles. Females may lay from 4 - 12 white eggs as early as April through June, with young hatching in late July through October. PROTECTION: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "Taking" of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. "Take" is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, I S' 2t}11 0o626S5F•KDsi eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. lAtlarhmani G EIS Plan Page 10 of 10 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 419 of 745 Killing, harming, or harassing indigo snakes is strictly prohibited and punishable under State and Federal Law. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, to handle an eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. LEGAL STATUS: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "raking" of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. "rake" is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. SAJ-2011-00626(SP-KDS) Attachment C: EIS Plan Page 9 of 10 August 12, 2013 ATTENTION: THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES MAY BE PRESENT ON THIS SITE!!! t, Please read the following information provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to become familiar with standard protection measures for the eastern indigo snake. V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_delMdeliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 420 of 745 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LISTED SPECIES RED COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis) FLORIDA BONNETED BAT (Eumops fioridonus) BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL (Sciurus niger avicennia) EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE (Drymarchon corals couperi) GOPHER TORTOISE (Gopherus Polyphemus) Project: COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Location: Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East (26'10'27.35"N; 81'39'43.93"W) Prepared for: U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)South Florida Ecological Services Field Office 1� 1339 20" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FWC) Office of Conservation Planning Services { 620 South Meridian Street Tal€ahassee, FL 32399 Date: November 26, 2012 Revised: December 18, 2012 Revised November 18, 2013 Prepared by: 5475 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite S West Naples, FL 34116 (239) 304-0030 Bavlitn 11000 Metro Parkway 71; Suite 4 E' ":-nnrnenia Fort Myers, FL 33965 CURSU1.1'. 1nC (239)418-D671 6 EXHIBIT E ent D: Species Management V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 421 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species INTRODUCTION This document provides a summary of onsite management activities proposed for implementation on the Collier County Resource Recovery Park site. Management activities will take place within the proposed preserve areas and will benefit a number of listed species, including Red Cockaded woodpecker (Picoides Borealis), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus Niger Avicennia), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon Corois Couperi), And Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus Polyphemus). PROJECT LOCATION The Collier County Resource Recovery Park site is located in portions of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is situated north of the Collier County landfill, east of the Golden Gate Canal\Golden Gate Estates Unit 28, south of the Hideout golf course, and west of Garland Road. See Figure 1 below. PINE RIDGE RD RADIO RD _DAV15 tlivu ` 176 LEGEND ('sus�Et� nnoe� rr �0�++ry wain map npaPs u'+i -ewck aP�usrs o i s SMILE Figure I. Site Location. Page 2 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 422 of 745 COLLIER COUNT' RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of Resource Recovery Park is to construct a collection and transfer site adjacent to the existing landfill that will provide for resource recovery and recycling. Specifically, the solid waste recovery facility will include handling and/or processing of materials such as tires, glass, paper, plastics, storm debris, construction debris, and construction demolition debris. Processing of these materials will keep them in the recycle stream and prevent them from being buried within the landfill. The proposed project is being constructed because the existing landfill facilities will not meet the needs of the surrounding area in the next 25 years. Construction and operation of the proposed facility will extend the projected life span of the landfill operation to at least 50 years. Currently, existing materials collected in the County that qualify for recycling are shipped to Pembroke Pines for processing. Having this facility in Collier County will prevent the fiscal and environmental impacts of shipping these materials across the State. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The Resource Recovery Park Site has the following surrounding land uses: West Golden Gate Canal North Hideout Golf Course South Undeveloped Lands, Collier County Landfill East Garland Road, Low Density Residential Vegetation Community Summary Table (Existing) 411 ine Flatwoods 0.12±at. 411E1 ine Flatwoods (1-24%Exotics) 149.32±ac. 412E2 ine Flatwoods (25-49%Exotics) 3.69±at. 41JE3 ine Flatwoods (50-74%Exotics) 1.55±at. 428 abbage Palm 3.03±at. 428E1 abbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 18.704 ac. 428H abbage Palm, Hydric 5.08f at. 428HE1 abbage Palm, Hydric (1-24% Exotics) 6.161 ac. 435E2 urned Pine Flatwoods (1-24%Exotics) 9.39±ac. 621E4 rvpress Wetlands (75-99%Exotics) 1.28±at. 624E1 ypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 122.97± ac. 624E2 ypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (25-49% Exotics) 9.34±at. 832H PEUtility Easement, Hydrlc 0.87±ac. 833 ellfield and Associated Roads 12.72± at 344.22± ac. (Figure 2) shows the current FLUCFCS breakdown on the property: Page 3 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 423 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species ------------ nW 11�Teei1 •n-w•y,�•_ _ •NWy'M, .1.' .� _ YID AeW ,M COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK viraumc CO°s�r°Ob a e„r, FLUCFCS MAP Z Figure 2. Existing Conditions FLUCSFCS mapping (wetlands are hatched). Based on the FLUCFCS system, the following is a description of each community currently present on the property: 411 Pine Flatwoods (1-24%Exotics) (Il acres) This upland habitat type occupies 0.12± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine (Pines eiliottii), Sub -canopy includes minimal Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), cabbage palm (Sobal palmetto) and Guiana myrsine (Myrsine guianensis). Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), cabbage palm, saw grass (Cladium jamaicense), Bahia grass (Paspolum nototum), and Caesar weed (Urena lobata). 411E1 Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) (149.32± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 149.32± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine (Pines elliottit7, Sub -canopy includes minimal Brazilian pepper (Schinus rerebinthifolius), Earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), cabbage palm (Sal palmetto) and Guiana myrsine (Myrsine guianensis). Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, saw Page 4 of 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 424 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species palmetto (Serenoo repens), cabbage palm, saw grass (Cladium famaicense), Bahia grass (Paspolum notatum), and Caesar weed (Urena lobata), 411E2 Pine Flatwoods (25-49% Exotics) (3.69± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 3.69± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine. Sub -canopy and ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia, Guiana myrsine, and cabbage palm. Ground cover also includes Caesar weed, smilax (Smilax sp.), and grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50-74% Exotics) (1.55± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 1.55± acres of the property. Canopy vegetation is slash pine. Sub -canopy includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia, and cabbage palm. Ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, Earleaf acacia saw palmetto, Caesar weed, and smilax. 428 Cabbage Palm (3.03±acres) This upland habitat type occupies 3.03± acres of the property. The canopy and sub - canopy contain cabbage palm. The ground cover includes wild coffee and beauty -berry. 428E1 Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) (18.70±acres) This upland habitat type occupies 18.70± acres of the property. The canopy and sub - canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes Brazilian pepper, smilax, Caesar weed and beauty -berry. 428H Cabbage Palm, Hydric (5.081 acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 5.08± acres of the property. This area was recently burned and the vegetation community has slightly changed, leaning to a more upland community. The canopy and sub -canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags, Brazilian pepper, and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, and beauty -berry. 428HE1 Hydric Cabbage Palm (6.161acres) This wetiand habitat type occupies 6.16± acres of the property. This area was recently burned and the vegetation community has slightly changed, leaning to a more upland community. The canopy and sub -canopy contains cabbage palm, slash pine stags, Brazilian pepper, and some melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover includes smilax, grapevine, Caesar weed, and beauty -berry. 435E1 Burned Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) (9.39± acres) This upland habitat type occupies 9.39± acres of the property. Due to a recent burn, the canopy and understory are open. The canopy contains sparse slash pine, live oak, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains some cabbage palm. The ground cover is sparse and includes Bahia grass, Caesar weed, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. Page 5 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 425 of 745 COLLIER COUNT' RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species 621E4 Cypress Wetlands (75-99% Exotics) (1.28± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 1.28± acres of the property. The canopy is dominated by cypress. The sub -canopy contains cypress, Brazilian pepper, swamp bay (Persea palustris), Earleaf acacia, dahoon holly (flex cassine), Guiana myrsine and wax myrtle (Myrico cerifero). The ground cover includes swamp fern (8iechnum serrulatum), Caesar weed, grapevine, and Earleaf acacia. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 624E1 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) (122.97± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 122.97± acres of the property. The canopy contains slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and Earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper, small cypress, wax myrtle, coco plum, myrsine, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes smilax, grape vine, saw grass, Caesar weed. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 624E2 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm (25-49% Exotics) (9.34± acres) This wetland habitat type occupies 9.34± acres of the property. The canopy contains slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and Earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper, small cypress, wax myrtle, coco plum, myrsine, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes smilax, grape vine, saw grass, Caesar weed. This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as wetlands. 832H FPL Utility EasementHVdric (0.87±acres) This area is occupied by Florida Power and Light electrical transmission lines and roadways. It accounts for 0.87± acres of the property. 833 Wellfield and Associated Roads (12.72± acres) This area is occupied by a large County well field and accounts for 12.72± acres of the property. It includes access roads, pump stations, and utilities. Page 6 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 426 of 745 COLUER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species PROPOSE[) SITE CONDITIONS AFTER DEVELOPMENT Figure 3. Post Development Conditions FLUCSFCS mapping. Vegetation Community Summary Table (Post Development) commafRgA Pine Flatwoods 0.121Ac 0.12±Ac~ 0.00± Ac 411 411E1 Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) 149.32±Ac 84.53±Ac 64.79±Ac 413E2 Pine Flatwoods (25-49% Exotics) 3.69±Ac 1.B3±Ac 1.86±Ac 411E3 Pine Flatwoods (50-74% Exotics) 1.55± Ac 0.00t Ac 1.55± Ac 428 Cabbage Palm 3.033 Ac 0.00± Ac 3.03± Ac 428E1 Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 18.70±Ac 18.70±Ac 0.00± Ac 428H Cabbage Palm, Hydric 5.08±Ac 0.00± Ac 5.08±Ac 428H El Cabbage Palm, Hydric (1-24% Exotics) 6.16± Ac 6.16± Ac 0.00± Ac 435E1 Burned Pine Flatwoods (1-24% Exotics) 9.39x Ac 9.39t Ac 0.00± Ac 621E4 Cypress Wetlands (75-99%Exotics) 1.28±Ac 0.00± Ac 1.28±Ac 624E1 Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm (1-24% Exotics) 122.97±Ac 29.64±Ac 93.33±Ac 624E2 Pine,Cypress, Cabbage Palm (25-49% Exotics) 9.34±Ac 4.34±Ac 5.00±Ac 932H FPL Easement, Hyd6c 0.87±Ac 0.00± Ac 0.87±Ac 833 Wellfield with Associated Roads 12.72±Ac 0.00±Ac 12.72±Ac 344.22±Ac 154.73tAc 189,511Ac Page 7 of 26 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\del iverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 427 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species LAND PROTECTION A Conservation Easement will be placed over the preserved lands and granted to Florida Department of Environmental Protection with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) included as a third party to the agreement. INITIAL MAINTENANCE AND MITIGATION ACTIVITIES Collier County will be responsible for 5 years following the initial exotic removal and site preparation activities, external fencing of the property, burn plans and prescribed burn activities, mowing, vegetative monitoring, and wildlife monitoring LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE Collier County will be responsible for long term management activities, with the assistance of Conservation Collier, FWC, or FWS to implement and manage prescribed burns, mowing, exotic removal and maintenance as needed. Annual costs will be estimated following the initial maintenance activities to set up an escrow account or similar financial mechanism to ensure that the costs of management the lands in perpetuity will be met. MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES BY SPECIES The following section provides biology and proposed management activities for each affected species. Red Cockaded Woodpecker [RCW) Biome The RCW is listed as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (Sullivan 2004, 35 Federal Register [FR] 16047). The RCW is 8.5 inches long with black and white horizontal stripes on its back and a large unbroken white cheek patch (Jackson 1994). It has a black cap and stripe on each side of the black cap. Adult males weigh about 1.6 ounces and may be distinguished from females by the presence of a small tuft of red feathers (cockade) on the sides of the head. Adult females weigh less than males averaging 1.48 ounces (City Gate HCP). RCWs. forage an pine trees for insects, spiders, and other invertebrates. For foraging, they use a variety of pine species throughout their range. In this region of Florida, RCWs spend about 10% of their foraging time in cypress habitats and the V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 428 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species remainder on pines. Females forage more frequently on the bole (trunk), while males make greater use of the limbs, cones, and twigs. Thus, males forage higher in the tree compared to females. Both sexes forage primarily on trees greater than 15 years of age and 4 inches or larger in diameter. Larger and older pines are preferred foraging sites, although foraging may occur on younger pines (City Gate HCP). Proiect Region The occurrence of RCWS in the vicinity of County Road 951 was first evaluated by the FWC in the late 1980s and included about 27 occupied clusters. Since then that population has declined and now accounts for about 8% of the south Florida woodpecker groups extending from Avon Park to the Big Cypress National Preserve (BCNP) (Wood and Wenner 1983; DeLotelle 2004) (Figure 4). The population on the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF) has increased recently as a result of cavity augmentation and bird translocation (DeLotelle, Folk). (Figure 4) details the current RCW clusters within the BCNP, PSSF, and the North Belle Meade (NBM). Figure 4. Existing RCW Cluster Locations in BCNP, PSSF, & NBM. Page 9 oF26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 429 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Past management practices in the Naples area using small, an -site preserves and limited management appear to have been a failure as indicated by the population declines observed in the 1990s, including the complete extirpation of groups west of Collier Boulevard. (City Gate HCP). Within the vicinity of the Collier County Resource Recovery Park (CCRRP), there are four (4) remaining active RCW clusters in the North Belle Meade (NBM), (Figure 5) shows the CCRRP's location in relation to the clusters in the NBM. The Hideout cluster located approximately one mile north of the property has a roosting male RCW, but has produced no breeding activity. Three clusters, the Rocco cluster, the Hussey East, and Hussey West are breeding clusters that have produced fledglings in recent years. As part of a 2009 Incidental Take Permit, the final RCW located on the City Gate property to the west of the CCRRP was relocated to the PSSF. The CCRRP site and its vicinity have been extensively surveyed for cavity trees in an effort to locate additional breeding clusters in the NBM. No additional cavities have been observed on the subject property or Its vicinity in annual surveys conducted by DeLotelle & Guthrie going back to 2003 and most recently by Wild Folk, Ecotone Environmental, and Boylan Environmental Consultants. All parties are confident that the property does not contain inactive or active RCW cavity trees. Page ]O of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 430 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed 5pecles Protect Impacts The CCRRP property does contain approximately 164.06 acres of pine flatwoods, 132,31 acres of mixed pine and cypress or cypress communities that likely provide foraging habitat for RCW clusters located to the north and east of the site. Most of the potential foraging habitat on the property is of very low quality for RCW. Mid -story and groundcover are dense and severely overgrown with a mix of cabbage palm, pine saplings, myrsine, and various exotics such as Brazilian pepper and ear leaf acacia. Red Cockaded woodpecker Management Activities For mitigation for impacts to low quality RCW foraging habitat, the applicant is proposing mitigation onsite. Approximately 166.53 acres of low quality foraging habitat will be preserved onsite (approximately 58.20 acres of pine flatwoods, 98.33 acres of mixed pine and cypress). The intent is to manage these habitats for RCW in order to transform them into quality foraging habitat and the pine flatwoods into potential nesting habitat. The following is a basic framework for what the onsite work for RCW management will include: See (Figure 6) for specific locations. 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (USFWS 2003) are met. An exception to the recovery plan will be preservation of existing snag trees as potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 5. installing and maintaining artificial cavities within the pine flatwoods, which are currently unoccupied nesting habitat. The proposed preserve on the CCRRP is perfectly situated between the isolated RCW group on the Conservation Collier Nancy Payton preserve to the north and the City Gate mitigation parcel cluster (ROCCO) to the east. Establishing a new nesting group at this location would provide roosting and nesting cavities for fledglings from the RCW groups in the North Belle Meade which would otherwise have no place to roost within NBM (Monica Folk, personal communication). 6. Monitoring and reporting of the status of the recruitment cluster. Page 11 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 431 of 745 {YELLOW) RCW RECRUITMENT CLUSTER LOCATION 8 GOPHER TORTOHSE RELOCATION AREA APPRO& 25ACRES MIDSTORY THINNING SAPPLING REMOVAL PRESCRIBED BURNING ARTIFICIAL CAVITY INSTALLATION Figure G. Management Activities Overview, COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species LEGEND �u�raro �unX.cvr�er arresw�owxexwc ®E Ismu ®iaOM-0[XWu MWEr4X05 All of these activities will provide an immediate RCW net conservation benefit and will benefit all the other species outlined in this plan. The following is a more detailed description of each activity, 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. The initial mitigation activities for the CCRRP Preserves will include the eradication of melaleuca and other exotic vegetation as identified by FLEPPC 2012. The limits of the preserve areas will be flagged in the field prior to exotic removal activities. Eradication methods will consist of mechanical removal, cutting and stump treatment of all woody exotic species, foliar treatment of all saplings and/or herbaceous exotics species, and/or hand pulling. All treated woody vegetation will either be stacked within the preserve, mulched in place, and/or removed from preserve. A technician that is licensed to apply herbicide in natural and aquatic areas by Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) will supervise activities. All tree stumps that are cut and ground with the machinery will be treated with a U.S. Page 12 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 432 of 745 CotklER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved herbicide and visual tracer dye. Any accumulated trash and refuse will be hand removed from preserve area. For areas requiring mechanical removal, a low ground pressure posi-track will be utilized to mechanically remove exotic vegetation to limit soil disturbance. A mulched layer will remain to limit exotic regrowth from exposed open areas. Mechanical eradication will be utilized in areas where exotic vegetation exceeds 50%coverage. Mechanical clearing limits will be flagged in the field. Areas mechanically cleared of exotics will be re - contoured to natural grade if necessary. Mechanical work will be conducted only during times of dry soil conditions to minimize ground disturbance. Mechanical clearing limits may vary as a result of soil conditions or other limiting factors. All areas to be mechanically cleared of exotic vegetation will follow the same pre -construction clearing procedures outlined above in order to protect potential fox squirrel nests. Removal of these invasive plant species will reduce existing fuel loads and thereby temperature of the initial prescribed fire, and make possible the restoration of the natural fire regime to these habitats and benefit a multitude of plant and animal species, particularly the RCW and the Florida panther, but also the white-tailed deer (Odoccileus virginianus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), and other upland fauna. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. With DOF assistance, a fire management plan will be created. If necessary it will be coordinated with other local qualified agencies for review and approval. Due to the existing County well field that surrounds the proposed prescribed burn area, extensive coordination with Collier County Public Utilities will be necessary. The plan must include the following elements: purpose and measurable objectives, description of the burn unit, map of the burn unit, weather factors, safety concerns, fuel conditions, season and time of day, smoke screening, publicity, legal requirements, firing plan, equipment and personnel, contingencies, control and mop -up, declaring the fire out and evaluation and monitoring. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. The perimeter of the proposed burn unit (as shown in Figure 6) is clearly delineated by the surrounding well easements. Fire lines may be necessary to break the proposed burn area into more manageable pieces or to protect pump areas and well equipment. Before clearing any vegetation, permits must be received from the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Department. A gopher tortoise and updated species survey will be done prior to any vegetation clearing or reduction. Fire lines will be installed utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. Fire breaks will be disked or mulched Page 13 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 433 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species down to soil and will go around all mature pine trees; they will be a maximum of B-10 feet wide. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (IISFWS 2003) are met. Reduce coverage of overgrown mid story vegetation, including pine saplings, cabbage palm, and excessively tall saw palmetto. Goals will be to mechanically or manually reduce cabbage palms to approximately 4 per acre and within 100 feet of potential cavity trees before any controlled burn. Saw palmetto greater than 3 feet in height or that surround potential cavity trees should be reduced before any controlled burn. Reduction may be accomplished by manual or mechanical means and may include thinning of diseased pine trees through logging. An exception to the recovery plan will be preservation of existing snag trees as potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 5. Installing and maintaining artificial cavities within the pine flatwoods, which are currently unoccupied nesting habitat. The proposed preserve on the CCRRP is perfectly situated between the isolated RCW group on the Conservation Collier Nancy Payton preserve to the north and the City Gate mitigation parcel cluster (ROCCO) to the east. Establishing a new nesting group at this location would provide roosting and nesting cavities for fledglings from the RCW groups in the North Belle Meade which would otherwise have no place to roost within NBM (Monica Folk, personal communication). A new recruitment cluster on the CCRRP property will be established in the area of pine flatwoods outlined in yellow on (Figure 6). Selection of specific trees and cavity installation would be completed by a contractor approved for artificial cavity installation. At least 4 artificial cavities will be installed in suitable slash pines within the preserve. 6. Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring of the recruitment cluster will be conducted during the reproductive season (April -July), late summer (August -September) and mid -winter (January -February) for five years following cavity installation. The cluster will be resurveyed to determine the number and status (occupied, abandoned, and start -hole tree) of each cavity tree. Each cavity will be visually inspected to determine if RCWs are using it. Maintenance may be required on cavities that leak or contain debris from other species. A Treetop II Nest Peeper will be used to inspect cavities for leaks or use by other species at least once a year. All cavity trees will be marked with white paint, new identification numbers, and located by Global Positioning System for proper documentation. Any cavities that leak or have otherwise deteriorated will be replaced. Additional cleanup will be conducted around new replacement cavity trees as needed. Page 14 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 434 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Annual Property Data Reports will be submitted to the RCW Recovery Coordinator at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for 5 years. These reports will include details on any habitat and land management activities, nesting activity, and proposed management activities for the following year. Florida Bonneted Bat jEumops flaridvnusj Biolo Excerpts taken from Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 191 "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plant; Endang_ered.Species Status for the Florida Bonneted Bata The Florida Bonneted Bat was listed as endangered by the USFWS on November 1, 2013. The bonneted bat is a member of the Molossidae family and is the largest bat species in Florida. The name "bonneted" bat originates from their large broad ears that project forward over the eyes. Range Southern portion of Florida, except the Florida Keys. Habitat Habitat for the bonneted bat consists mainly of foraging areas and roosting sites. No active natural roosts have been identified or confirmed to date. Bonneted bats are closely associated with forested areas because of their tree -roosting habits. Evidence suggests that they do use tree cavities for roosting. They seem to be more closely associated with wet habitats such as wet prairies, cypress stands, and hydric pine flatwoods. Pr__ojectiMpacts The CCRRP property does contain approximately 164.06 acres of pine flatwoods, 132.31 acres of mixed pine and cypress or cypress communities that may provide foraging or roosting habitat for bonneted bats. Most of the potential foraging habitat on the property is likely of very low quality for bat due to its reduced hydrology and dense\overgrown nature. Mid -story and groundcover are dense and severely overgrown with a mix of cabbage palm, pine saplings, myrsine, and various exotics such as Brazilian pepper and ear leaf acacia. Florida Bonneted Bat Management Activities For mitigation for impacts to possible bonneted bat roosting and foraging habitat, the applicant is proposing mitigation onsite. Approximately 166.53 acres of (currently) low quality forested habitat will be preserved onsite (approximately 68.20 acres of pine flatwoods, 98.33 acres of mixed pine and cypress). The intent is to manage these habitats for RCW and bonneted bats in order to transform them into quality habitat for both species. The following is a basic framework for what the onsite management for bonneted bats will include: Page 15 of 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmenta1105_report_delivldeliverablelmem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 435 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species Land management activities for the bonneted bat will match those being completed for RCW. See (Figure 6) for specific locations. 1. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. 2. Develop and implement a controlled burn program within the preserve. 3. Installation of fire lines utilizing best management practices to minimize impacts to mature trees, habitat and wildlife populations. 4. Control hardwoods, mid story vegetation, and excessive pines in the preserve through the use of mechanical or chemical methods or through the use of prescribed fire so that the density guidelines contained in Appendix 5 of the RCW Recovery Plan (USFWS 2003) are met. An exception to the recovery plan will be preservation of existing snag trees as potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 5. Preserve existing snap trees located within the preserves in order to maintain potential roost sites for the bonneted bat. 6. Install two bat houses within the preserve as potential roost locations for bats. All of these activities will provide an immediate bonneted bat net conservation benefit and will benefit all the other species outlined in this plan. See the RCW sections for detailed descriptions of land management activities that will apply to both species. The following is a more detailed description of bonneted bat specific activities (#5, & #6): S. Installing and maintaining at least two bat houses within the CCRRP preserve areas. At least two bat houses will be installed within the CCRRP preserves. The applicant will consult with Fly by Night, Inc. (www.f lybyni_ghtinc.org) regarding exact specifications and placement of the houses on the property. The bat houses will be maintained according accepted best management practices for bats as outlined by Fly by Night. 6. Monitoring and Reporting Installed bat houses will be monitored annually for 5 years. Houses will be checked for activity and determinations will be made for any maintenance that might be necessary. Annual Property Data Reports will be submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for 5 years (in concert with RCW reporting). These reports will include details on any habitat and land management activities proposed management\maintenance activities for the following year. Big Cypress fox Squirrel (5ciurus niger avicenniar) Biology The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) is one of three fox squirrel sub -species found in Florida. It weighs approximately one to three pounds and averages 13 inches in body length (minus tail length). Their bushy tail can be up to 14 inches long. This size makes them noticeably larger than the more common gray squirrel. Fox squirrels are highly variable in color; from tan and reddish orange to black. Often the nose, front toes, and ear tips are white. Page 16 of 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 436 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan far Listed Species Range It generally ranges south of the Caloosahatchee River and is classified as Threatened by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Habitat Primary habitats for the big cypress fox squirrel are open pine flatwoods, cypress strands, broad -leaf evergreen hammocks, mangroves, and oak forest. More urban habitats may include golf courses and residential areas with native vegetation. Fox squirrels spend a significant amount of time on the ground foraging for pine seeds, cypress balls, and cabbage palm or palmetto berries, thus an open understory is critical, Optimal habitat for a fox squirrel has an open park -like quality. Life History Fox Squirrels are usually active during the day and build nests not only for breeding, but for resting or sleeping. Leaf or stripped bark nests may be found in pines, cypress, cabbage palms, and melaleuca. They may also nest in tree hollows and bromeliad clusters. Litters of approximately 2 to 4 young are produced each year. The young are weaned at about 2 to 3 months of age. Protect Impacts No Big Cypress fox squirrels or signs of fox squirrels were observed on the subject property. The development area of the project will be cleared for construction so precautions will be taken in the event that fox squirrels are present on the property at that time. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Activities The main focus of this management plan is to prevent incidental take of fox squirrel nests during construction activities and to maintain Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat within the preserves on the property after it is developed. This will be accomplished through a series of pre -construction precautionary activities and by preserving suitable habitat onsite and enhancing it through exotic removal. Pre -Construction Precautions: In order to prevent incidental take of fox squirrel nests during construction activities the following precautions will betaken: The limits of the preserves will be flagged or otherwise marked in the field prior to any construction activities. Immediately prior to any construction or clearing, the area slated for development will be re -surveyed for fox squirrel nests. If no nests are found, the clearing will be allowed to commence. If any nests are observed, buffers of 125 feet will maintained around each nest tree until the nests are found to be inactive or abandoned. In order to consider the Page 17 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 437 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Specles nest inactive or abandoned, it will be observed on 3 consecutive days during the morning or evening hours. If no squirrels or sign of activity are documented in the 3 days, FWC will be contacted and the tree containing the nest will be removed and the clearing of the area will commence. Preservation and Enhancement: The proposed preserve\enhancement areas are shown in Figure 6. Specific enhancement activities are outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above. Perpetual Management: Management activities will ensure that all preserve areas are maintained free of exotic plants in perpetuity. This is achieved by establishing a scheduled program to maintain the site free of exotic plants. The preserves will be evaluated on an annual or semi-annual basis for exotic vegetation. Exotics will be removed as necessary to ensure that exotic species will constitute no more than 0 percent of total cover. Any future changes to the fox squirrel management activities outlined above will be submitted to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for approval prior to implementation. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchan Corais Couperi) Biology Excer t taken from City Gate HCP, 2009 The eastern indigo snake is listed as threatened by the FWC and as threatened by the USFWS (Sullivan 2004, 43 FIR 4028). The eastern indigo snake is the longest North American snake, reaching 102 inches in length. The overall coloration is iridescent black, with a throat varying in color from red to white. Currently, only Georgia and Florida support eastern indigo snake populations, although there are historical records for Mississippi, Alabama, and southern South Carolina. Although, occurring in all 67 Florida counties, this snake is local in its distribution occurring only in suitable habitat areas (Moler 1992), This species may be found in a range of habitats (wetlands to uplands) and home ranges can be as large as 247 acres. It frequently uses the burrows of gopher tortoises as winter shelters although less so in central and south Florida Breeding occurs from November to April with eggs (n = 5 - 10) laid in May or June. Eastern indigo snakes feed on a variety of vertebrate species, including the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamonteus). The decline of this species is the result of over collection for the pet trade and habitat degradation and fragmentation. No eastern indigo snakes were observed on the project site. Protect Impacts No eastern indigo snakes have been observed on site, but they may occur in association with gopher tortoise burrows or in other habitats on the site. Indigo snakes are relatively secretive by nature and usually occur in low density; so their visibility is low. The surveys of likely habitat and for tortoises revealed no indigo snakes. Page 18 or 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 438 of 745 COLUER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Spedes Eastern Indigo Snake Management Activities The CCRRP will follow the standard protection measures for the eastern indigo snake as outlined below. STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE 1. An eastern indigo snake protection/education plan shall be developed by the applicant or requestor for all construction personnel to follow. The plan shall be provided to the Service for review and approval at least 30 days prior to any clearing activities. The educational materials for the plan may consist of a combination of posters, videos, pamphlets, and lectures (e.g., an observer trained to identify eastern indigo snakes could use the protection/education plan to instruct construction personnel before any clearing activities occur). Informational signs should be posted throughout the construction site and along any proposed access road to contain the following information: a. a description of the eastern indigo snake, its habits, and protection under Federal Law; b. instructions notto injure, harm, harass or kill this species; c. directions to cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site on its own before resuming clearing; and, d. telephone numbers of pertinent agencies to be contacted if a dead eastern indigo snake is encountered. The dead specimen should be thoroughly soaked in water and then frozen. 2. If not currently authorized through an Incidental Take Statement in association with a Biological Opinion, only individuals who have been either authorized by a section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the Service, or by the State of Florida through the Florida Fish Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for such activities, are permitted to come in contact with an eastern indigo snake. 3. An eastern indigo snake monitoring report must be submitted to the appropriate Florida Field Office within 60 days of the conclusion of clearing phases. The report should be submitted whether or not eastern indigo snakes are observed. The report should contain the following information: a. any sightings of eastern indigo snakes and b, other obligations required by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, as stipulated in the permit. Page 19 of 2fi V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 439 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARR Management Plan for Listed Species Prior to clearing activities, a pre -construction meeting will be held with contractors. A sign (Figure 7) will be posted in the construction area (at the construction trailer or permit board) and each worker will be provided with an informational brochure similar to (Figure 8): EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE =Ro3Ecr: PROTECTION PLAN COLLIER COUNT' RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK DATE: NOVEMEER 26, 2012 IDENTIFICATION The Eaalant Indigo Snake Is the largest mil"leo —snake in hbdhWnerica. The ev,rege elxe le appmklm "R"M in Ianglh, wllh a Mavy bolt. It is a unlfurm shiny M,„V,,k wtlh Iha chln a ruely Mown fo red min, The Intllgo anaNe B often mMuead wilh Iha mutll more mmmon acNls,m black rx,r. the bMtll r,msr 3e generally a boiler ml,r black with, while chin and, slander bulld RialaitrelAgand ,Wi I.relreal EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE cyma�.a��a�,war WHAT TO DO IF YOU OBSERVE AN EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THIS SITE: t. Cease all construction activities immediately. 2. NiMy the onsite construction supervisor and contact the project bio)ogist: EGGTONE ENdReNMENTAL (23p)2aSaa2 fX. FbNa FI&, eM lwalb cmaarvallen Lemmlaebn Tamlami Trl, Safe 9t11 1... . P�nle GmE,, FL 99p6p .,ol 9vlss FM and w1- Servira. OI9u of Ecobpic& al- (]9a)9654,)9 3. Leave the snake unharmed and allow it sufficEenl time to move away from construction activities on Its own. 4. Once the biologist corilirned the snake is out of harms way, construction activities can resume. COMMON BLACK RACER canem �no-wlm Figure 7. Example Indigo Snake Informational Sign to be Posted at Construction Site, Page 20 of 76 V:v:12156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 440 of 745 Contacts: In cone r>F a Iisil-II a Eaetem ind,w [noire durin eamtrtrtlon contact one d the folbtWng: Eadt.- Erwironmentuel (239) 205.d= leremy Steen U.S- Fhh and Wildlifs 5-11 (739) 333-2973 Florida Flth and Ortigde Eolnervcetltm Commiseian 3941 Tamlomi Trail, Suite 3111 Puerto Gordo, FL 339so .ecotone The The Eodem Indl9v.rnhe 10rymunhun comic ¢aup¢d)nth. c—t ..he in the wenedstela- h 1--tem. mmahen for she dlotb Potty Innpe wha%e denda,.a auermo,mithentbe F .lem now. —W. In the port the Eartem ,nd'gc node ha boon to1—d oc v Per due to In dodlc nmae. M eolce Ar a Pm and h. wee dbepptadnp 'o"oe here kad to [h. I`— heal.. "olM Doan, addedty tM—dad" a, Ilet vI the [I Fhh pad Wort Con —con Commntlon ,no the 115. Fdh hnd with[[ Semicte. The E,etem Indi„ mane I. oho ,mtettedu the and —of Spada Ad 01YI3 Thom n a am,nllol for thb mob, to be found Basic Facts Physical Description: The E-onem Indigo enab can nach,taehee in aengds They am.taxbypM tolorad p 91euy blue�blseh udth the chin, naty hmwn to nd color. Nabdae: I..rh Smdas,edAhfasNfn rul, p—T1,e l—.,pb,n9oph, tdod ,'b,ro or proar. They aba m,ide in gopher tortobe,'bunovr br proledl,n end ummlh Meting NibllS: lull ipBMe moos 1mm No,ember to February ¢Mh Monte-an'..'en, In Me Id, to 0tt¢ber- P,.dNi!labile: Its Ea000h aaaaumtrebnmobhm, re FI soub ht Io it pony. an fora, In n•mrmau, bad'. her mono. ald lo. dr The Eastern Indlgo snob[ is net vend I 11 a an-onane 1, Inc zn3 Trade Csnter Way NaI FIL 34169 (.11O5_3132 caw c b —on �ecotonc � •sm�itral COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species �sy1Yl ti� �11 THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE What to do if you Le al Information See an Eastern for Contractors Indigo 5nahe lne6 door lndlpn sorb. h b, born on this site pmbd.d kv adFederal9epuM om. itatia.r. nPmn norm. wrtae. num. -.L wound but m.1ed, .¢Wmv, rolled. hv.no-or e ar Emt.mi [:pored drolP l leunioone onymcha11— ,Dia IJ.Janeha eeuree shell he ce.nlrutdun, Shnleltouin,m........ tabem. di o",I, Wh drNrredm'm .I Tls,e ru;el ,PPIV m the tnebG Pam tlsreel m lan,nodem- 0 1r.o ,uuuctlen vdiuhy in Me aee Under CiMpt.r es, Fbdda Adminsdrptiu al the dit"I 9 immedl@dye Coco D—thep.re4t,ereari,l— Pull Mbk of o 1..11 degree ns—oaalor, a) H.Din She E—,a E.—I—onol h10-01 Whh upon aeoo.00lhK andior eo dhy! npmcdm the both of 11I brethnr,: imltdrenme,R for lint vnenwh vdddwegl penph3at tFertmter. y) Allow the au—indgo mode Under the Endnneened era—, Ad the In moo. non. }rem In. perpRlet ere no felew: I -or 1".of :W—Shn. ate on:town bebre do—o, see,000.aa In 4rp p.min.• and rert+petm mmlmRlPn fan. on no, -- I year for.rlo,1-1 0e1.1-11—,,d¢d. EASTERN INOIaO SNAKE COMMON BLACK RACER nrymwrhen —.< l— cavber¢eatlme- Page 21 of 215 V:02156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 441 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan far Listed Species Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Biology (Excerpt taken from City Gate HCP, 2009) The gopher tortoise is listed as a species of special concern by the FWC (Sullivan 2004) and federally listed in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama (52 FIR 25376). This large terrestrial turtle can reach lengths up to 38 cm and is tan or brown in overall coloration. The gopher tortoise occurs throughout the southeastern coastal plain in appropriate habitat (Diemer 1992). The gopher tortoise is extant in all 67 counties of Florida; although, numbers are declining, especially in the southern peninsula where their distribution is limited and fragmented by unsuitable habitat and increasing urbanization. The tortoise occupies habitats with well -drained loose soil in which to excavate burrows, a low herbaceous ground cover for forage (e.g., fire -maintained), and open sunlit sites for placing nests. Typical habitats include sandhill, scrub, dry pine flatwoods, and disturbed habitats. The gopher tortoise digs extensive burrows, which provides refuge for 300 invertebrate and 60 vertebrate species. Gopher tortoises breed from mid -May to mid -June. One clutch, averaging six eggs, is produced annually and the incubation period varies from 80 to 110 days. Gopher tortoises are herbivores, which forage on a variety of grasses, legumes and fruits. habitat destruction is the primary threat to the gopher tortoise; however, a respiratory disease has recently become an important threat, too. Project Impacts A species survey was originally conducted in January and February, 2012. The site contained approximately 10 active 11 inactive burrows and 4 abandoned burrows. Construction of the project's main water management lake will require impacts to tortoise burrows. A permit to relocate impacted tortoises will be acquired which will allow any tortoises impacted within the development footprint to be relocated into the upland preserve area located in the northwest portion of the preserve. Gopher tortoises not impacted by development will remain. This area is proposed to be preserved, and will have active land management that will benefit the habitat of the tortoise. No construction activities will take place in this area. Gopher Tortoise Management Activities Pre -Construction Prior to relocation activities, management and enhancement activities as outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above will occur to prepare the recipient area for the tortoise. Once a relocation permit has been acquired, the property will be resurveyed for gopher tortoises no longer than 4 weeks prior to site clearing. The recipient area within the upland Page 22 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 442 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species preserve area will be staked. Installation of the temporary tortoise fencing will be installed prior to construction. Chicken wire will be installed and a portion of the fence will be trenched underground. The silt fence will be installed to the outside of the chicken wire. Following installation of the fencing, the area will be re -inspected by county staff, and then a vegetation permit for minor clearing to excavate the tortoises will be issued. Excavation and Relocation The physical relocation will be done by a qualified Gopher Tortoise Agent and will occur as follows: A flexible hose will be snaked down the burrow in order to track the direction of the burrow. A backhoe will carefully excavate soil material until just before reaching the burrow. Excavation will then occur manually to ensure no injury to the tortoise. All captured tortoises will be measured and their scutes will be notched according to the prearranged numbering system per the recipient site requirements, and then placed in crates and moved over to the gopher tortoise on -site recipient area. In addition, commensal species within burrows will also be safely relocated to the on -site preserve. If any Eastern indigo Snakes are encountered, they will be allowed to vacate the area prior to continuation of work. Note: "tortoises shall not be captured / relocated on days for which the overnight low temperature for that day and the two consecutive days thereafter is forecasted by the U.S. National Weather Service to be below Si This 3-day window of milder overnight temperatures is to allow the relocated tortoises to settle into the recipient site". Post -Construction When construction on -site is completed, the tortoise fence will be removed. On -site Gopher Tortoise Preserve Area Management 1. Exotic Vegetation Removal, Non-native Vegetation, and Nuisance or Invasive Plant Control The proposed preserve\enhancement areas are shown in Figure 6, Specific enhancement activities are outlined in the RCW Management Activities section above. 2. Maintenance: The tortoise preserve area will be walked and inspected at least once yearly for the presence of exotic vegetation, Every two years the preserve will be evaluated for manual trimming. Preserve trimming shall be conducted prior to the start of the rainy season; this will promote new growth of the recently trimmed material. Trimming will only occur as necessary to maintain the open space required for the gopher tortoises inhabiting the preserve area. The maintenance program will be conducted in perpetuity. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the developer, or their successor. The tortoise preserve area shall be maintained in its natural state and must be kept free of refuse and debris. Page 23 of 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05_report_deliv\deliverable\mem_of_findings_ccgomp_Iss_ttt_20201208.docx Page 443 of 745 COWER COUR7Y RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species PHASING OF MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES The initial exotic removal and maintenance schedule, including burn and mowing activities, may be phased within the preserve to stagger burn and maintenance activities. (Figure 9). Phase 1 will include western half of areas north of the well field access road. These areas include the intensely managed RCW Management and Gopher tortoise recipient area. These mitigation activities will coincide with impacts to the phase 2 development area. Phase 2 will include the remaining wetlands on the eastern half of the preserve located north of the well field access road. These mitigation activities will coincide with impacts to the phase 2 development area. Phase 3 will include the upland and wetland areas south of the well field access road and adjacent to the development area. It is anticipated Phase 3 would be initiated following initial clearing of the remaining development boundary (phases 3, 4, & 5) for access purposes. TIMING AND SCHEDULING The following is a more detailed description of the timing each activity as it relates to the project construction: 1. Monitoring and Reporting a.) Vegetative Monitoring - Baseline monitoring will occur prior to the onset of any management activities. The Time -zero monitoring report for the management activities will be completed within 60 days of the completion of exotic removal. Annual reports will be submitted following the Time -zero for 5 years or until the goals of the mitigation activities have been met. b.) Wildlife Monitoring — Prior to site clearing within the development area, a Gopher Tortoise Survey will be conducted over that phase of the development area. In addition, a Fox Squirrel nest survey will be conducted prior to clearing; to determine is any actively nesting Fox Squirrels are present within the clearing area. Finally, a survey will be conducted for cavities that might harbor bonneted bats. c.) Semi-annual RCW Monitoring Surveys will be conducted in accordance with the FWS Protocol during both the breeding season (April 15-June 15) and the non - nesting season or fall (October 15- December 15) following installation of the artificial cavities. Reports will be submitted following the completion of each Survey event. 2. Removal of invasive, exotic vegetation. The initial mitigation activities for the CCRRP Preserves will include the eradication of melaleuca and other exotic vegetation as identified by FLEPPC 2012. This activity is anticipated to commence upon receipt of all development approvals and be phased Page 24 of 26 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105—report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss—ttt-20201208. docx Page 444 of 745 COLLIER COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK Management Plan for Listed Species according to development impacts (see phasing outlined above). Maintenance events will occur at a minimum of twice a year after initial treatment, and continue for a minimum of five years. If vegetative monitoring data shows additional treatments are necessary, the maintenance and exotic removal schedule may be revised to increase the number of events until target species are controlled. After five years, if exotic removal activities are successful, the exotic removal would then be continued on an annual or as - needed basis. 3. Mid -Story Vegetation Thinning and Fuel Reduction Reduce coverage of overgrown mid story vegetation, including pine saplings, cabbage palm, and excessively tall saw palmetto, may be accomplished by manual or mechanical means and may include thinning of diseased pine trees through logging. It is anticipated these activities would occur concurrent with the exotic removal, or shortly thereafter. Reduction of mid -story canopy coverage within the RCW Management Unit will occur prior to any controlled burn in order to reduce the fuel load, and to maintain the cover requirements and management goals. These activities will coincide with phase 1 development impacts. 4. Fire Lines and Mowing Following the initial exotic removal treatment and thinning of overgrown mid -story, fire breaks will be installed where needed in accordance with an approved Fire Management Plan in accordance with Division of Forestry practices. Mowing will occur in upland areas surrounding the development site, areas surrounding existing structures and wells, and when weather conditions prohibit the use of controlled burns. S. Prescribed Fire Controlled burns will only occur within the proposed burn management area, when conditions are appropriate. To mimic a natural fire regime, timing will likely occur during the late spring or summer (May — July) at intervals appropriate for each vegetative community. Estimated frequency of burn events will be two to five years. 6. Installing and maintaining artificial cavities \ bat houses Following initial management activities within the phase 1 mitigation area, including exotic removal, mid -story thinning, and prescribed fire or mowing, the artificial cavities will be installed within the preserve. Page 25 of 26 V:v:\2156\active\2270446701 \environmental\05—report—deliv\deliverable\mem—of—findings—ccgomp—Iss—ttt-20201208.docx Page 445 of 745 _ _ e. i 5 •i Mpi e O !Si -a, 1 Ei m 0 N U a O a 00 0 Page 446 of 745 Collier County Resource Recovery Park On -site Mitication, maintenance, and Monitoring Plan SAJ-2011-00626(SP-KD S) April 9, 2014 Description: The enhancement and preservation of 103.49 acres of wetlands and 63.69 acres of uplands and the purchase of 12.15 palustrine credits at Panther Island Mitigation Bank. The mitigation will be conducted in phases linked to the development phases. The table below identifies the phases of development and the associated mitigation. Table 1: Mitigation Surnma Mitigation Phase Construction Phase Impact acreage Onsite En hancem ent Acres Mitigation Credits 1 1 4.33 9.24 1.55 2 2 4.63 51.08 0 3 3, 4, 5 30.28 46.14 10.61 Total 39.24 106.46 12.15 (r) Objectives: The goal is to achieve 0 percent cover of exotics immediately following any maintenance and the total exotic and nuisance species shall constitute no more than 5 percent of total cover in the 167.18-acre preserve area. In addition, the intent of the onsite mitigation is to provide quality foraging and nesting habitat for the RCW and FBB. (if) Site Selection: The mitigation area is accessible, strategically located, and contains highly valuable habitat types for endangered species. The site provides unique habitat for the following listed species: RCW, Eastern indigo snake, and FBB. The mitigation site currently contains low -quality foraging habitat. However, within the vicinity of the mitigation site, there are four remaining active RCW clusters. Three of these clusters are breeding pairs with potential to utilize the mitigation site for foraging. Most of the potential foraging habitat on the property is likely of very low quality for the FBB due to its reduced hydrology and denseiovergrown nature. The intent is to manage these habitats for RCW and FBB in order to transform them into quality foraging habitat and the pine flatwoods into potential nesting habitat for the RCW. (N) Site Protection Instrument: Within 90 days of commencement of the project or prior to any onsite land clearing, whichever is earlier, a conservation easement will be filed and recorded over the 167.18 acres (103.49 acres of wetlands and 6.69 acres of uplands) of onsite preserved lands. The conservation easement will be granted to Florida Department of Environmental Protection with the Corps and FWS included as a third party to the agreement. SAJ-2011-00626(SP-KDS ) Attachment E: Mitigation Plan Page 1 of 13 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 447 of 745 The remaining 2.97 acres of wetlands on the project site cannot be placed under the conservation easement because they are located in the existing wellfield access roads and within the FPL easement. These wetlands will not be impacted but will be enhanced through exotic removal. (iv) Baseline Information: The onsite mitigation area is approximately 167.18 acres located in portions of Section 25. Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is situated north of the Collier County landfill, east of the Golden Gate CanallGolden Gate Estates Unit 28, south of the Hideout golf course, and west of Garland Road. The mitigation area contains approximately 63.69 acres of pine flatwoods (uplands), 5.08 acres of cabbage palm (FLUCCS 428, hydric), 1.26 acres of cypress wetlands (FLUCCS 621, hydric), and 99.22 acres of pine, cypress, cabbage palm (FLOCS 624, hydric), and 0.86 acres FPL easement (FLUCCS 832, hydric). The wetland areas are shown in green in the figure below while the uplands are shown in orange. Figure 1: Preserve boundaries The site currently contains low quality habitat for the RCW, FBB, and the panther. However, the site is located in close proximity to FBB sitings and RCW nests. SAJ-2011-00626(SP-KDS ) Attachment E: Mitigation Plan Page 2 of 13 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 448 of 745 ATTENTION: THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES MAY BE PRESENT ON THIS SITE!!! IF YOU SEE A LIVE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site without interference. Personnel must NOT attempt to touch or handle snake due to protected status. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • If the snake is located in a vicinity where continuation of the clearing or construction activities will cause harm to the snake, the activities must halt until such time that a representative of the USFWS returns the call (within one day) with further guidance as to when activities may resume. IF YOU SEE A DEAD EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE ON THE SITE: • Cease clearing activities and immediately notify supervisor or the applicant's designated agent, and the appropriate USFWS office, with the location information and condition of the snake. • Take photographs of the snake, if possible, for identification and documentation purposes. • Thoroughly soak the dead snake in water and then freeze the specimen. The appropriate wildlife agency will retrieve the dead snake. USFWS Florida Field Offices to be contacted if a live or dead eastern indigo snake is encountered: North Florida Field Office — (904) 731-3336 Panama City Field Office — (850) 769-0552 South Florida Field Office — (772) 562-3909 Killing, harming, or harassing indigo snakes is strictly prohibited and punishable under State and Federal Law, DESCRIPTION: The eastern indigo snake is one of the largest non -venomous snakes in North America, with individuals often reaching up to 8 feet in length. They derive their name from the glossy, blue -black color of their scales above and uniformly slate blue below. Frequently, they have orange to coral reddish coloration in the throat area, yet some specimens have been reported to only have cream coloration on the throat. These snakes are not typically aggressive and will attempt to crawl away when disturbed. Though indigo snakes rarely bite, they should NOT be handled. SIMILAR SNAKES: The black racer is the only other solid black snake resemblingthe eastern indigo snake. However, black racers have a white or cream chin, thinner bodies, and WILL BITE if handled. LIFE HISTORY: The eastern indigo snake occurs in a wide variety ofterrestrial habitattypes throughout Florida. Although they have a preference for uplands, they also utilize some wetlands and agricultural areas. Eastern indigo snakes will often seek shelter inside gopher tortoise burrows and other below- and above- ground refugia, such as other animal burrows, stumps, roots, and debris piles. Females may lay from 4- 12 white eggs as early as April through June, with young hatching in late July through October. PROTECTION: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the U5FWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "Taking" of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. "Take' is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, tSA'J-201'1-G0526(SP-KDS) eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. Allc: EIS plan Page 10 of 10 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 449 of 745 Killing, harming, or harassing indigo snakes is strictly prohibited and punishable under State and Federal Law. Only individuals currently authorized through an issued Incidental Take Statement in association with a USFWS Biological Opinion, or by a Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit issued by the USFWS, to handle an eastern indigo snake are allowed to do so. LEGAL STATUS: The eastern indigo snake is classified as a Threatened species by both the USFWS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "Taking" of eastern indigo snakes is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act without a permit. "rake" is defined by the USFWS as an attempt to kill, harm, harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect, or engage in any such conduct. Penalties include a maximum fine of $25,000 for civil violations and up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment for criminal offenses, if convicted. SAJ-2011-00626(SP-KDS) Attachment C: EIS Plan Page 9 of 10 AlAI�A�N`NTLIMe August 12, 2013 ATTENTION: THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES MAY BE PRESENT ON THIS SITEM Photo: Dirk Stevenson Please read the following information provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to become familiar with standard protection measures for the eastern indigo snake. Page 450 of 745 EXHIBIT F December 2001 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Technical Information Bulletin Use of Electric Fencing to Exclude Bears and Prevent Property Damage Electric fencing has proven effective in deterring bears from entering landfills, apiaries (beehives), livestock pens, gardens, orchards, and other high -value properties. Numerous electrical fence designs have been used with varying degrees of success. Design, quality of construction, and proper maintenance determine the effectiveness of an electric fence. The purpose of this technical bulletin is to assist the property owner in understanding and implementing electrical fencing as a tool to exclude and prevent damage caused by black bears. Understanding Electric Fencing Electric fencing provides an electrical shock when an animal comes into contact with the electrically charged wires of the fence. People unfamiliar with electric fencing often are afraid that it will injure, permanently darnage, or kill an individual or pet that contacts the fence. This is not true! A properly constructed electric fence is safe to people, pets, and bears. Components of Electric Fencing An electric fence is composed of four main elements: a charger, fence posts, wire, and the ground rod. Fence ar er. On a small scale electric fence (like that typically needed for bear exclusion), the largest cost is normally the fence charger. A fence charger's job is to send an electrical pulse into the wire of the fence. Contrary to popular belief, there is not a continuous charge of electricity running through the fence. Instead the charger emits a short pulse or burst of electricity through the fence. The intensity and duration of the electrical pulse varies with the type of charger or controller unit. Chargers with a high -voltage, short duration burst capacity are the best because they are harder to ground out by tall grass and weeds. These types are also the safest, because, even though the voltage is high (5 kilovolts) the duration of the burst is vary short (2/10,000 of a second) (FitzGerald, 1984). 7 W 11-028; s328-002 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 451 of 745 Two basic energy sources for chargers are batteries (I2-voltautomotive type) and household current (110 volt). Battery -type chargers are typically cheaper to purchase but require more maintenance because of the necessity of charging the battery. The advantage of a battery powered charger is that it can be used in a remote location where 110-volt current is not available. Most units that are powered by a fully charged 12-volt deep -cycle batteries can last three weeks before needing a charge_ Addition of a solar trickle charger will help prolong the duration of effective charge in 12- volt batteries. Fence Posts. On small scale fences, the posts are normally the second largest expense involved in construction. Therefore, when planning an electric fence it is a good idea to utilize existing fencing in order to save money. If no existing fence is available, posts will need to be placed around the area needing protection. Posts may be wood, metal, plastic, or fiberglass. Wood and metal posts will need to have plastic insulators attached to them which prevent the electric wire from touching the post causing it to ground out. Plastic and fiberglass posts do not need insulators, the wire may be affixed directly to these posts. Wood and metal posts are typically more expensive and require the added expense of insulators, however, they are more durable and generally require less maintenance. Wire. Fourteen to seventeen gauge wire is the most common size range used in electric fencing. Heavier wire (a lower gauge number) is more expensive but carries current with less resistance and is more durable (FilzGerald, 1984). The two most common types of wire are galvanized and aluminum. Galvanized wire is simply a steel wire with a zinc coating to prevent rust, which makes the wire last longer. Some wire is more galvanized than others. The degree or amount of zinc coating that is around the core steel wire is measured in three classes. A class I galvanization means the wire has a thinner coating of zinc than a class II galvanization. Class III galvanized wire has the heaviest zinc coating and will last longer than the class I and class II wire (FitzGerald, 1984). In general, the cost of galvanized wire increases as the class or amount of galvanization increases. Aluminum wire is typically more expensive than the galvanized wire, Some advantages of aluminum wire are: it will not rust, it conducts electricity four times better, and it weighs one-third less than steel wire. The Ground Rod. The ground is an often overlooked, but critical part of an electric fence. Without a good ground, electricity will not flow through the wire. When an animal touches a charged wire, the body of the animal completes the electrical circuit and the animal feels the "shock'. The current must travel from the charger through the wire to the animal and then back through the ground to the charger if the animal is to feel the shock. The soil acts as the return "wire" (ground) in the circuit. However, if e �- ii-ozessza�aoz C y h:N.ry V 11 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 452 of 745 bird was to land on a charged wire without touching the soil the bird would not complete the circuit and would be unaffected (FitzGera(d, 1984). Some fence configurations use actual grounded wires within the fence to enhance the grounding system. The ground may be a commercial ground rod or a copper tube or pipe driven six to eight feet in moist soil Copper is expensive, so a copper coated steel pipe or any other good conducting metal pipe will work also. Very dry soil can effect the ability to create a good ground and has sometimes been a problem during drought conditions. Pipe may be a better choice than a solid rod during drought conditions, because water may be poured down the ground pipe to improve the ground. Some fence configurations use wires as the grounding system, rather than relying solely on the soil as a ground. Recommended Electric Fence to Deter Black Bears Conditions at fence sites will vary and will determine what the most effective fence configuration will be. Commission biologist welcome the opportunity to visit sites and provide custom tailored advise on constructing an effective electric fence. The following recommendation will cover most situations with low to moderate pressure from black bears. Use a five strand aluminum wire fence that is 40 inches high with wire spacing every eight inches apart using the previously mentioned wired grounding system (see Figure 1). The wire closest to the ground level (the lowest wire) should be a charged or "hot" wire. The second wire should be grounded. The third wire should be hot. The fourth wire should be grounded and the fifth wire should be hot. If using metal or wood posts, insulators must be used to keep the hot wires from grounding out. The cost of this type of electric fence utilizing fiberglass posts and a 110 volt fence charger is approximately $200 for a 40' x 40' area (160 linear feet of fence). Materials: 1 - 1, 312 foot roll (114 mile) 14 gauge aluminum electric fence wire 1 - 50 foot roll 12 gauge insulated wire 20 - 5 foot 518 inch dia fiberglass fence posts 5 - plastic gate handles 1 - 110 volt fence charger 1 - 10 foot ground pipe 4 - plastic electric fence signs Installation. These instructions are for a square shape fence exclusion, but the process would be very similar for other applications. Drive 4 corner posts 1-foot deep into ground and stake with guy wires. Clip, rake, and keep clear any vegetation in a 15-inch wide strip under the fence and apply herbicide. Attach and stretch the aluminum wire at 8-inch increments starting 8 inches from ground level. A loop of wire li•rmil ,vint�t, i 11-0265326-002 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 453 of 745 should be left on each wire at the first corner post. Once the wire has been stretched around the outside of all the comer posts back to the first post a plastic gale handle should be attached to each wire and the gate handles should be attached to each corresponding loop on the first corner post. Drive in the remaining 16 posts to the same depth at 8-foot intervals between corner posts. Secure each of the five wires to each of the posts with additional wire. Attach four plastic electric fence signs (one on each side) to the top wire of the fence. Attach a 12-gauge strand of insulated wire to the positive fermi nal of the fence charger and attach it to the first, third, and fifth wires of the fence. Attach another 12 gauge insulated wire to the negative terminal of the charger and attach this wire to the ground pipe which has been driven into the ground 6 to 8-feet deep. Attach another 12 gauge insulated wire from the negative terminal of the charger to the second and fourth wires on the fence. Plug the charger into a 110 volt power supply and the fence is in operation. Tips to improve the effectiveness of your electric fence to deter black bears: 190naivi 1. If using a 1 Z-volt fence charger, ensure that the battery is charged; check eve z � two weeks. �i-azasa2a-ooz z .•„ h , 2. Make sure terminals on the charger and battery are free of corrosion. �� " 3. Make sure hot wires are not being grounded out by tall weeds, fallen tree hQ,ti branches, broken insulators, etc. 4. If fence wires have been broken and repaired, make sure wires are corrosion free where they have been spliced together. Also, tighten the fence at each comer post as wires that have been spliced and are loose make poor connections. 5. Be sure to rake vegetation from under and around the outside of the fence as this may act as an insulator. 6. To improve the ground around the perimeter of the fence add a piece of 24 inch chicken wife laying on the ground around the outside of the fence. This should be connected to ground_ 7. During periods of drought pour water down the ground pipe and around the ground pipe to improve the ground. Digging a 6 inch deep 6 inch diameter hole around the ground pipe and back filling with rack salt will also improve the ground. Additional ground pipes may also be added to portions of the fence farthest from the charger. 8. To ensure that the bear solidly contacts the charged portion of the fence, a bait like bacon strips, a can of sardines, or tin foil with peanut butter may be attached to one of the top hot wires_ Make sure these do not contact the ground, thus V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 454 of 745 shorting out the fence. 9. When protecting a specific structure (like a shed or rabbit hutch), the fence should be placed 3 to 5 feet away from the structure (rather than an it) so that the bear encounters the fence before reaching the attractant. 10. Protect the fence charger from the elements by covering it with a piastic bucket or a wooden box. 11, Place plastic electric fence signs around the perimeter of your fence to improve visibility and to warn other people. LITERATURE CITED FitzGerald, James (M4), The Best Fences. Storey Publishing Bulletin A-92, Pownal, Vermont. p.14A6. Figure 1. Diagram of properly constructed electric fence to exclude bears. Exclusionary Electric Fencing i 14 Gauge Alurnwn wire 5' Floarglass Post - (amen da l art Gale hande GMVI Wi 7 — i M. •n�M�of'A-1'M�HwW.' -G1eldld Level 12 Gauge hsWeted YM 15•[nn�Nxa-- r ^ CapperGround Pipe h tdriven Ir-6'deep) ,L >>-pZ85s2e-oo2 ? V F=r: nlrri:= /7 V:v:121561active122704467011envi ron m enta1105_report_delivldel ive rablelmem_of_fi nd i ngs_ccgom p_Iss_ttt_20201208. docx Page 455 of 745 Fence Charger 12 Gauge i lnsulated Wire Exclusionary Electric Fencing 14 Gauge f Aluminum Wire 15' Fiberglass Post (driven 1' deep) (spaced S' apart) fGate Handle v ~ Ground Level -- Copper Ground Pipe (driven 6' - B' deep) Grou 16" L z 11-028532E 002 o \ yam• Page 456 of 745 TREBILCOCK CONSULTING SOLUTIONS Traffic Impact Statement Collier County Government Operations Business Park Excavation Permit Modification Prepared for: Downrite Engineering Inc. 14241 SW 143rd Court, Miami, FL 33186 Phone: 786-493-0274 Collier County, Florida 12/8/2025 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* — Small Scale Study — No Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal. Page 457 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. ,`N `J "T Z' No 47116 0 O:. STATE OF :�4U This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA-1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Digitally signed NorM an by Norman Trebil co Trebilcock Date: C k 2025.12.08 12:53:51-05'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 12 Page 458 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Table of Contents ProjectDescription..........................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................... 5 Project's Zone of Influence and Traffic Distribution....................................................................... 7 Background Traffic Volumes......................................................................................................... 11 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions without Project........................................................... 13 Future Roadway Conditions with Project..................................................................................... 15 Code of Ordinance, Sec. 22-111 (a) (3) f....................................................................................... 19 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 20 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 20 Appendices Appendix A: Approved Development Excavation Permit............................................................ 21 Appendix B: SDP Amendment — Approved Permitting and Construction Plan Set - Excerpts .... 24 Appendix C: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) ................................................... 29 Appendix D: Collier County FY25 — FY29 Five Year Work Program/CIE...................................... 37 Appendix E: Collier County 2024 AUIR Attachment G................................................................ 39 Appendix F: South US 41 TCEA.................................................................................................... 41 Appendix G: East Central TCMA..................................................................................................44 Appendix H: Hurricane Evacuation Routes.................................................................................47 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 3 Page 459 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Project Description The Collier County Government Operations Business Park project (hereafter "project") is located at 3959 City Gate Boulevard N, generally situated in the northeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Interstate 75 (1-75) interchange (Exit 101), in Section 35/36, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The project location map is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1— Project Location Map The subject site is currently zoned Industrial Planned Unit Development (IPUD) to accommodate the uses generally associated with various governmental operations/facilities (Collier County Resource Recovery Business IPUD —Ordinance No. 17-01). Stormwater treatment facility excavation operations are currently approved for the subject site — Excavation Permit No. PL20240001696 (reference Appendix A). The developer proposes to modify the excavation permit to allow the excavated material to be removed from the project site. The purpose of this traffic report is to fulfill the requirements set forth in the Collier County Code of Ordinances Section 22-111 (a) (3) f, for projects seeking to remove the excavated material from the project site. The following Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) will examine the anticipated trip generation of the proposed operation and evaluate the impact the additional trips will have on the surrounding roadway network. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Page 460 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures. The subject site provides a direct connection to City Gate Boulevard N which was approved as part of the Excavation Permit No. PL20240001696 (reference Appendix A) and Site Development Plan Amendment, Permitting and Construction Plan Set PL20240001696, dated 7/22/2024 (for relevant excerpts refer to Appendix B). No changes to the existing access are proposed as part of this application. Upon approval, the proposed excavation will be permitted for the removal of approximately 110,000 cubic yards (cy) of overburden material from the subject site. The hauling activities will have a maximum lifespan of 6 months and will be operating from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM (10-hour workday), Monday through Friday. The excavated material will be hauled to the following destinations: - Location #1: The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Boulevard and south of Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Collier County (+/- 40,000cy); - Location #2: Home Depot —11800 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Collier County (+/- 15,000cy); - Location #3: 5175 Maple Ln, Naples, Collier County (+/- 33,000cy); - Location #4: Gator Circle at 37th St, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 15,000cy); - Location #5: Entrada, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 7,000cy). The study analysis year is 2026. A methodology memorandum was transmitted via email to the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on November 26, 2025 (reference Appendix C). Trip Generation Excavation activities are allowed in agreement with the approved Excavation Permit (PL20240001696). This report conservatively assumes that the trip generation for the truck traffic generated by the proposed hauling operations is in addition to the allowed truck traffic associated with the excavation activities. Approximate volume to be hauled = 110,000 cy. The hauling trucks expected to remove the material from the property will be 18 cy. Hauling activities lifespan = 6 months or 20 x 6 = 120 workdays. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 15 Page 461 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 No reductions for internal capture or pass -by trips have been considered in this report. The average daily two-way trips are based on the number of trucks needed to remove the maximum amount of fill. A 10% adjustment factor is applied to account for any visitor or vendor trips to the site and any potential truck traffic pattern fluctuation. The hauling operation is expected to generate 112 daily two-way truck trips Unadjusted — 2 trip end x 110,000cy/(18cy/truck x 120 workdays) = 102 daily two-way trips Adjustment Factor —110% x 102 = 112 daily two-way trips Over a 10-hour workday, the project will generate 12 peak hour two-way trips Unadjusted — 102 daily traffic/10 workday hours =10.2 rounded to 10 peak hour two-way trips Adjustment factor —112 daily traffic/10 workday hours =11.2 rounded to 12 peak hour two-way trips Directional distribution assumption: 50% ingress; 50% egress or 6 enter and 6 exit trips for both the AM and PM peak hours. The project trip generation summary is shown in Table 1. Table 1— Trip Generation Daily Two- AM Peak Hour* PM Peak Hour* Land Use Factor Way Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Volume Hauling Operations 102 5 5 10 5 5 10 10% Adjustment Factor 1.10 112 6 6 12 6 6 12 Note(s): *Peak Hour Volume = Daily Traffic/ 10 hours. Directional distribution assumption is 50%/50% In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total trips) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. The potential impacts to the roadway segments within the project's zone of influence are evaluated based on the peak hour, peak direction traffic conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 16 Page 462 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Project's Zone of Influence and Traffic Distribution The zone of influence associated with hauling activities is defined in the Collier County Code of Ordinances Section 22-111 (a) (3) f 1 as "the distance from the site that traffic is either generated or attracted to". Based on the proposed hauling destinations the following truck routes are considered in this report: Truck Route A — from Project site to Location #1: The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Boulevard and south of Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Collier County (+/- 40,000cy); - Truck Route B — from Project site to Location #2: Home Depot — 11800 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Collier County (+/- 15,000cy) and Location #3: 5175 Maple Ln, Naples, Collier County 33,000cy); - Truck Route C — from Project site to Location #4: Gator Circle at 37th St, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 15,000cy) and Location #5: Entrada, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 7,000cy). The proposed truck routes are depicted in Figures 2A, 213 and 2C. Figure 2A — Proposed Truck Route A Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 17 Page 463 of 745 4 Rwa EAWL= . S—h— v -i J.I [ _ J� 1. �( - .: _ _ � � is •• _ _ 7 .�xi i I'r[: 1�/!.:4n,!. • ,J� � �r,wvd Gl kFGdr j , ram- •• i. '\•"& - M''-�. 'fe14 ssba l' o!MNII, nG � �;�� • � �, A �S?� '�— �k ira'I. 1:a'r'RVdl4rk'�',5:� ,- �.=� Location #3 i • — FI i 5' n.:,�.:�,:i � Ir r1tl` Location `Tr Home Depot r ifra}C r � • IOaGcr[] �e<: �,y flihCe.^kl •, MUM k A J ..h HwFnx.. Cxrra Jl# �' FCiI17C'll . I"li �� IYF'.��"•,' IA rx� '-Ai. nli�vm • s v. �• tirx•ha'u � � T IJ 7, .I. •. ,T Y nw�ae:ru%ue' •.ar<' y _ fsGx•r�u" N Jx91rs :r'1• Y � k ''� � $�}{}Idt ` �ii trli'iF l a�• /lAsiV--Sung �® •Ir � ��a�r �l yy: ^I p.rxi r�: �r«17a mld('�fC II I il[!%y Wi�f}79Cf7rCnr } I. Fin kshr- .'rt.Heples_FL 3.157 Nulk Wa Asca dr ; Tar :l t Big otlxe4s srard' � WJld!iip - , .'siYrl uen[ FaNahalG'Fac•,�'a9'-"J?�'I f4L7lyy1; �,r "'�� Z'SSiKL•PilrJr Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 The traffic generated by the proposed project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and engineering judgement. The truck trips are distributed and assigned to each haul route that the trucks would use to access the site. Figures 3A, 3113 and 3C illustrate the assignment of the projected truck trips based on the PM peak hour, peak direction. A distribution percentage of 100% of the average project peak hour, peak direction trips (Table 1) is utilized for the road segments within the project's zone of influence. Figure 3A —Truck Route A Trip Distribution Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 19 Page 465 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Figure 3B — Truck Route B Trip Distribution Figure 3C — Truck Route C Trip Distribution Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 110 Page 466 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Background Traffic Volumes Tables 2A, 2B and 2C contain the road segments within the project's zone of influence associated with each truck route, on which the project impact was reviewed. The 2024 background traffic volumes are from the 2024 AUIR. Future 2026 background traffic volumes are estimated using the average annual growth rate for the segment, as utilized in the 2024 AUIR for future volume estimating. Consistent with the AUIR, another way to derive the future background traffic volume is to use the 2024 background traffic volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two results is used as the future background traffic volume. Table 2A — Truck Route A — 2026 Future Background Traffic without Project 2024 AUIR AUIR 2026 Pk Hr, Pk 2026 Pk Hr, Pk CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Annual Dir Background Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Background Percent Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (%/yr)Ill Growth Factor(2) Trip Bank(') City Gate N/A Project to N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blvd N141 Collier Blvd City Gate Blvd Collier N to Golden Blvd 32.3 Gate Main 1,920 2.07% 1.0418 2,000 210 2,130 Canal Golden Gate Collier 32.2 Main Canal to 1,920 2.07% 1.0418 2,000 58 1,978 Blvd Location #1(5) Note(s): The projected 2026 Peak Hour, Peak Direction background traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which Is underlined and bold as applicable. 1) Annual Growth Rate — estimated from 2008 - 2024 or 2% minimum. 2) Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate) A 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. 3) 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. 4) Not a monitored Collier County facility. 5) Location #1: The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Boulevard and south of Golden Gate Parkway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 111 Page 467 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Table 2B — Truck Route B — 2026 Future Background Traffic without Project 2024 AUIR AUIR 2026 Pk Hr, Pk 2026 Pk Hr, Pk CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Annual Dir Background Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Percent Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (%/yr)1'1 Growth Factor(2) Trip Bank(') City Gate N/A Project to N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blvd N(4) Collier Blvd Collier City Gate Blvd Blvd 32.3 N to 1-75 1,920 2.07% 1.0418 2,000 210 2,130 Collier 1-75 to Davis Blvd 33.0 Blvd 3,260 2.00% 1.0404 3,392 181 3,441 Collier Davis Blvd to 34.0 Rattlesnake 2,500 2.00% 1.0404 2,601 749 3,249 Blvd Hammock Rd Rattlesnake Collier Hammock Rd Blvd 35.0 to Tamiami 2,140 2.00% 1.0404 2,226 384 2,524 Trail E Tamiami Collier Blvd to Trail 94.0 Triangle Blvd 1,570 2.00% 1.0404 1,633 243 1,813 Triangle Blvd Tamiami Trail 93.0 to Location 2,370 2.00% 1.0404 2,466 382 2,752 #215) Tamiami Location #2(5) Trail 93.0 to Cypress Ln 2,370 2.00% 1.0404 2,466 382 2,752 Cypress N/A Tamiami Trail N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ln(4) to Tamiami Ct TamCypress N/A to N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I Cl4)) Maple Lnn Maple Ln(4) N/A Tamiami Ct to Location #316) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Note(s): The projected 2026 Peak Hour, Peak Direction background traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which Is underlined and bold as applicable. 1) Annual Growth Rate — estimated from 2008 - 2024 or 2% minimum. 2) Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate) A 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. 3) 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. 4) Not a monitored Collier County facility. 5) Location #2: Home Depot —11800 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Collier County (+/- 15,000cy) 6)Location #3: 5175 Maple Ln, Naples, Collier County (+/- 33,000cy) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 112 Page 468 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Table 2C — Truck Route C — 2026 Future Background Traffic without Project 2024 AUIR AUIR 2026 Pk Hr, Pk 2026 Pk Hr, Pk CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Annual Dir Background Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Background Percent Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (trips/hr) (%/yr)1'1 Growth Factor(2) Trip Bank(') City Gate N/A Project to N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blvd N141 Collier Blvd Collier City Gate Blvd 32.3 Blvd N to 1-75 1,920 2.07% 1.0418 2,000 210 2,130 Collier Blvd to County 1-7514I N/A Line and N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Locations #4(5) and #5(6) Note(s): The projected 2026 Peak Hour, Peak Direction background traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which Is underlined and bold as applicable. 1) Annual Growth Rate — estimated from 2008 - 2024 or 2% minimum. 2) Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate) ^2 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. 3) 2026 Projected Volume = 2024 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. 4) Not a monitored Collier County facility. 5) Location #4: Gator Circle at 37th St, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 15,000cy) 6) Location #5: Entrada, Cape Coral, Lee County (+/- 7,000cy) Existing and Future Roadway Conditions without Project The existing roadway conditions and minimum standard service volumes are from the 2024 AUIR. In agreement with the traffic data provided in 2024 AUIR Attachment F — Roadway Segments, one roadway segment located within the project's area of influence currently exceeds the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard: - Collier Blvd. segment from Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (County ID# 34.0). Consistent with the Collier County's Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five- year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered committed improvements. The adopted FY2025 — FY2029 Five Year Work Program/CIE for Collier County is depicted in Appendix D. With potential to the project's zone of influence, the FY2025 — FY2029 Five Year Work Program/CIE depicts the following committed road improvement: - Collier Blvd. segment from Green Blvd. to Golden Gate Canal (County ID# 32.1 and ID #32.2). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 113 Page 469 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Tables 3A, 3B and 3C contain the existing and future conditions for the County monitored road segments within the project's zone of influence associated with each truck route, on which the project impact was reviewed. Table 3A — Truck Route A — Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2024 2024 Pk 2026 2026 2026 Pk AUIR 2024 Min. Roadway Roadway Link Roadway Hr, Pk Dir Roadway Min. Hr, Pk Dir Link Standard Link Location Configura Service Configura Standard Service ID # tion LOS Volume tion LOS Volume City Gate Blvd N to Collier 32.3 Golden Gate Main 8D E 3,600 8D E 3,600 Blvd Canal Collier 32.2 Golden Gate Main Canal to Location 4D D 2,300 6D�ZI EIZI 3,000IZI Blvd #IM Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively. LOS = Level of Service. 1) Location #1: The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Boulevard and south of Golden Gate Parkway 2) Future roadway characteristics are consistent with AUIR link #31.2, Collier Blvd. from Green Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. Table 3B — Truck Route B — Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2024 2024 2024 Pk 2026 2026 2026 Pk Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Roadway Min. Hr, Pk Dir Roadway Min. Hr, Pk Dir Link Link Location Configura Standard Service Configura Standard Service ID # tion LOS Volume tion LOS Volume Co'lllier 32.3 75y Gate Blvd N to I- 8D E 3,600 8D E 3,600 Bld Collier 33.0 1-75 to Davis Blvd 8D E 3,600 8D E 3,600 I Blvd Davis Blvd to Collier 34.0 Rattlesnake 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Blvd Hammock Rd Rattlesnake Collier 35.0 Hammock Rd to 6D E 3,200 6D E 3,200 Blvd Tamiami Trail Tamiami Collier Blvd to Trail E 94.0 Triangle Blvd 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Tamiami Triangle Blvd to 93 0 6D E 3,000 6D E 3,000 Trail Cypress Ln Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively. LOS = Level of Service. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 114 Page 470 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Table 3C — Truck Route C — Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2024 2024 Pk 2026 2026 2026 Pk AUIR Min. Roadway Roadway Link Roadway Hr, Pk Dir Roadway Min. Hr, Pk Dir Link Standard Stan Link Location Configura Service Configura Standard Service ID # tion LOS Volume tion LOS Volume Collier Blvd 32.3 City Gate Blvd N to 1-75 8D E 3,600 8D E 3,600 Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 41), 61), 81) = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively. LOS = Level of Service. Future Roadway Conditions with Project A roadway concurrency analysis was performed for the study area roadway segments following the guidance provided in the Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures and using the information provided in the 2024 AUIR. The roadway segments were evaluated to determine if the adopted LOS standard is expected to be exceeded with the inclusion of the project trips. Tables 4A, 4B and 4C add the project traffic volumes developed in Table 1 to the 2026 background traffic volumes developed in Tables 2A, 2B and 2C. Project Traffic Impacts — Truck Route A Table 4A — Truck Route A — 2026 Future Roadway Total Traffic Conditions 2026 Pk Roadway Pk Min LOS Min LOS 2026 Pk /o Service AUIR Hr, Pk Hr Pk Dir— exceeded exceeded Roadway Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Volume Link Dir Project without with Link Location Total Impact by ID # Service Traffic TrafficlZl Project Project? Project? Volume Added(') Yes/No Yes/No lier F 32.3 City Gate Blvd N tod Golden Gate Main Canal 3,600 NB-6 2,136 0.2% No No Collier Blvd 32.2 Golden Gate Main Canal to Location #1(3) 3,000 NB-6 2,006 0.2% No No Note(s): 1) Background traffic peak direction — 2024 AUIR; project traffic added — Table 1. 2) 2026 Projected Volume = 2026 background (Tables 2A, 2B and 2C) + project traffic added. 3) Location #1: The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Boulevard and south of Golden Gate Parkway Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 115 Page 471 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 The results of the analysis show the capacity of the study area roadway segments does not exceed the available capacity at the adopted LOS standard under the 2026 future traffic peak hour, peak direction conditions, with or without the project traffic added. In addition, the projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. Project Traffic Impacts —Truck Route B Table 4B — Truck Route B — 2026 Future Roadway Total Traffic Conditions 2026 Pk Roadway Pk Min LOS Min LOS AUIR Hr, Pk Hr Pk Dir— 2026 Pk /o Service exceeded exceeded Roadway Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Volume Link Dir Project without with Link Location Total Impact by ID # Service Traffic Traffic (2) Project Project? Project? Volume Added(' 1 Yes/No Yes/No Collier City Gate Blvd N to 32.3 3,600 SB — 6 2,136 0.2% No No Blvd Collier 33.0 1-75 to Davis Blvd 3,600 SB - 6 3,447 0.2% No No Blvd Davis Blvd to Collier 34.0 Rattlesnake 3,000 SB — 6 3,255 0.2% Yes Yes Blvd Hammock Rd Rattlesnake Collier 35.0 Hammock Rd to 3,200 SB — 6 2,530 0.2% No No Blvd Tamiami Trail Collier Blvd to ITamiami 94'0 3,000 EB — 6 1,819 0.2% No No Trail Triangle Blvd Triangle Blvd to ITamiami Trail 93'0 Location #2(3� 3,000 EB — 6 2,758 o 0.2/ No No Tamiami Location #2(3) to 93 0 3,000 EB — 6 2,758 0.2% No No Trail Cypress Ln Note(s): 1) Background traffic peak direction — 2024 AUIR; project traffic added — Table 1. 2) 2026 Projected Volume = 2026 background (Tables 2A, 2B and 2C) + project traffic added. 3) Location #2: Home Depot —11800 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Collier County (+/- 15,000cy) As shown in Table 4B, the following study area roadway segment is projected to exceed the available capacity at the adopted LOS standard under the 2026 future traffic peak hour, peak direction conditions, with or without the project traffic added. - Collier Blvd. segment from Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (County ID# 34.0). Regulation of growth along deficient roadway segment(s) is presented in Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 6.02.02.H: "Except as provided for below in Transportation concurrency Exemption Areas (TCEA) and Transportation concurrency Management Areas (TCMA), no trips shall be allotted under a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy for development that Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 116 Page 472 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 directly accesses and generates more than a de minimis impact (de minimis impact is defined as traffic impact of 1 percent or less of the peak hour service volume) on the deficient roadway segment(s)." The projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. As illustrated in the 2024 AUIR Attachment G — Update Programmed Improvements and Deficiencies Report (Appendix E), the approved solution to the existing transportation deficiency on Collier Blvd. segment ID# 34.0 is to continue to monitor and pursue a study of the Wilson Benfield Corridor Alignment which is a parallel facility to Collier Blvd. (FY2029). Project Traffic Impacts — Truck Route C Table 4C — Truck Route C — 2026 Future Roadway Total Traffic Conditions 2026 Pk Roadway Pk Min LOS Min LOS AUIR Hr, Pk Hr Pk Dir— 2026 Pk /o Service exceeded exceeded Roadway Roadway Link Hr, Pk Dir Volume Link Dir Project without with Link ID # Location Service Traffic Total Impact by Project? Project? Volume Added(' � Traffic (2) Project Yes/No Yes/No Collier Blvd 32.3 City Gate Blvd N to 1-75 3,600 NB-6 2,136 0.2% No No Note(s): 1) Background traffic peak direction — 2024 AUIR; project traffic added — Table 1. 2) 2026 Projected Volume = 2026 background (Tables 2A, 2B and 2C) + project traffic added. Table 4C indicates the capacity of the study area roadway segments does not exceed the available capacity at the adopted LOS standard under the 2026 future traffic peak hour, peak direction conditions, with or without the project traffic added. In addition, the projected traffic impact is de minimis. South US 41 Transportation Concurrence Exception Area Pursuant to Policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) was designated. As illustrated in Policy 5.4 of the Transportation Element of the GMP, development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (Maps TR-4 and TR-4.1 reference Appendix F) shall be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures below: - Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways within the County by 5% or more of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements. - Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on SIS roadways within the County by less than 5% of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard and meets the requirements identified in Policy 5.5 are exempt from the transportation requirements. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 17 Page 473 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 The proposed project is not located within the designated South US 41 TCEA. The following road segments located within the project's zone of influence for Truck Route B are part of the South US 41 TCEA: - Collier Blvd. segment from Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to Tamiami Trail (County ID# 35.0). - Tamiami Trail segment from Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to Triangle Blvd. (County ID# 93.0). - Tamiami Trail segment from Triangle Blvd. to Collier Blvd. (County ID# 94.0). The subject project is not requesting an exception from transportation concurrency as the impacted segments within the South US 41 TCEA meet the Collier County transportation concurrency requirements (Truck Route B, refer to Table 413). East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area To encourage compact urban development, Collier County designated two Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs): Norwest TCMA and East Central TCMA. The TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County GMP. The proposed development is not situated within the County's designated TCMAs. The following analyzed road segments located within the project's zone of influence are part of the East Central TCMA: - Collier Blvd. segment from Golden Gate Pkwy to Golden Gate Main Canal (County ID# 32.2). - Collier Blvd. segment from Golden Gate Main Canal to 1-75 (County ID# 32.3). - Collier Blvd. segment from 1-75 to Davis Blvd. (County ID# 33.0). In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2024 AUIR, the East Central TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 86.3%. The East Central TCMA map and the associated percent lanes miles meeting standard in the year 2024 are illustrated in Appendix G: East Central TCMA. As illustrated in the Policy 5.8, transportation mitigation may be required when the proposed development will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report, by more than a de minimis amount (more than 1% of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of the GMP Transportation Element. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 118 Page 474 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 The subject project is not requesting an exception from transportation concurrency as the impacted segments within the East Central TCMA meet the Collier County transportation concurrency requirements (Truck Routes A, B and C; refer to Tables 4A, 413 and 4C). In addition, the projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. As illustrated in Policy 5.8(d) — Transportation Element, no impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA may require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. Within the East Central TCMA, Tamiami Trail and Colier Boulevard are designated hurricane evacuation routes and are projected to perform within the adopted LOS standard. The Collier County hurricane evacuation routes are illustrated in GMP Transportation Element Map TR-7 (Exhibit H). Code of Ordinance Sec. 22-111 (a) (3) f The Code of Ordinance Sec. 22-111 (a) (3) f was referenced to address the requirements specifically related to the removal of excavated material from the project site. 1. Identify the project's zone of influence, that is, the distance from the site that traffic is either generated from or attracted to. This information was detailed in the section Project's Zone of Influence and Traffic Distribution and Figures 2A, 213 and 2C of this report. 2. Address the existing condition of the road system within the excavation project's zone of influence. This information was detailed in the section Existing and Future Roadway Conditions without Project of this report. 3. Address the capacity of the road system within the zone of influence to handle existing traffic, normal growth in the traffic, and additional traffic generated from the excavation project in consideration of the time frame of the traffic generation and the wheel loadings of such traffic. The project traffic impacts and the capacity of each roadway segment within the project's zone of influence was evaluated in the section Future Roadway Conditions with Project of this report. The projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. Tamiami Trail and Collier Blvd. are major arterial roadways in Collier County. They were designed and constructed pursuant to County and State standards to accommodate the heavy vehicle demand this hauling operation will place on these roadways. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Page 475 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 4. Address the site -specific road work within the zone of influence which is necessary prior to the start of the project and which will be necessary during the project so as to assure that premature road failure and/or severe road damage will not occur. There are no identified road improvements that will be required by this project to accommodate the truck demand anticipated from the haul operations. 5. Road work to be undertaken by the applicant to mitigate adverse road impacts along with confirmation of the security, if applicable, to be provided by the applicant to assure completion of the identified road work. Any and all security and/or performance guarantee required in excess of $100,000.00 as set forth in the road use analysis shall be secured or guaranteed prior to Excavation permit issuance. If necessary, the developer will conduct a review of the existing roadway infrastructure with Collier County Road Maintenance to determine any concerns due to hauling of excavation material. This review will identify any areas of concern. Criteria to be considered include: current pavement rating; field review survey; current scheduled repairs; repairs to reduce the likelihood of accelerated damage under the proposed haul trips. Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed excavation permit modification to allow the hauling of overburden material off -site will not have an adverse impact to the surrounding roadway system within the project's zone of influence. An adverse impact to a roadway segment is considered when the future 2026 background traffic meets the adopted LOS standard and the segment becomes deficient with the addition of the project traffic. The Collier Blvd. segment from Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. (County ID# 34.0) is projected to exceed the available capacity at the adopted LOS standard under the 2026 future background traffic peak hour, peak direction conditions. As illustrated in the 2024 AUIR Attachment G — Update Programmed Improvements and Deficiencies Report, the approved solution to the existing transportation deficiency on Collier Blvd. segment ID# 34.0 is to continue to monitor and pursue a study of the Wilson Benfield Corridor Alignment which is a parallel facility to Collier Blvd. (FY2029). The projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. The proposed hauling activities will be allowed for a limited duration (up to 6 months). Per Collier County Land Development Code Sec. 10.02.07 B.5, temporary uses are exempt from transportation concurrency. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes paying the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 20 Page 476 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix A: Approved Development Excavation Permit Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 121 Page 477 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 AtCoflier County July 22. 2024 Chrissy Mitchell 1412 JACKSON ST Suite 3 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Re: (Development) Excavation Permit No. PL20240001696 Collier County Government Operations Business Park Excavation Permit(E4 Section(s) 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Dear Applicant: THIS ISYOUR PERMIT AND MUST BE POSTED ON SITE In accordance with the authority given in County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E_, Article IV, Sections 22-106-22-119, as amended, your application for a Development Excavation Is hereby approved Subject to the following stipulations: 1 The excavation .shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -3.77 ft-NAVD. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of 0.23ft-NAVD. 2. No excavated material shall be removed from the project site. 3. The lake littoral zone shall be created and planted as indicated on the Plan of Record and in accordance with County Ordinance 91-102 Section 3.05-10 as amended. 4 All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E-shall be adhered to. 5. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the excavating operation, A Dewatering Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy provided to Engineering Review Services for approval priorto the commencement of any dewatering activity on the site. 6. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Development Review Division. 7- If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a Vegetation Removal Permit, required by Land Development Code, Division 3.05 as amended shall be obtained from Collier County Environmental Services Division before work shall commence. 8. A 20 ft. maintenance easement shall be provided around the perimeter of the lake and a 20 ft. access easement to it shall be provided from a right-of-way. The easement shall be accessible to all maintenance vehicles. Since we are in receipt of the permit/ review fee in the amount of $ 1.587.02. this letter is your authorization to proceed with the excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above - mentioned stipulations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 122 Page 478 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 This permit is valid for (1) year and must be renewed on the anniversary data of permit Issuance The Plan of Record for this excavation is titled " Collier County Government Operations Business Park' Sheets 1-31 of 31 prepared by Stantec, signed and sealed by Chris E. Brockmeter, P.E., on May 23, 2024. S71PULATION: • issuance of a development permit by a county [foes not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any IlabiIity on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency a undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. This permit is conditioned on all other applicable state, or federal permits being obtained before commencement of the development, ■ Performance guarantee not required per Code of Ordinances Section 22-115(a) Should you have any further questions regarding this inatter, please feel free to ccntaot me at (239) 252` 2417. Sincerely, Development Review Division Growth Management Community ❑eveloprnerit Departrnem 28DO N. Horseshoe Or. Naples, Florida 341134 239-252-2400 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 123 Page 479 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix B: SDP Amendment - Approved Permitting and Construction Plan Set - Excerpts Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 124 Page 480 of 745 rD N l!1 'c 1.II��ri..Furnti Rrr-.xee X,tl ♦wrevwl For 3'edl1�. PIdWOW2579 X•. aAPxw �11��1�►[�� AWHE'4ATK]NS FkP � E.a � wKAEx, munwK E.rmeX, E4E P61L U.Ilry EgAxFNI W[ ,XV mVNrr Mlllr °�1fxfA1 E IxdAi Lr un vx 11NM REr xorm uF:ec+Y iemu� w+�x1 PWm u KXmu IxIF�c,aY Nc M o YPI Ix ra,NYcr r ■ vY �L BOPIIC nvos Fml aoww� EQYX1xFXr a Au,�Omr1aY a,v Fn o as.� rAWr Inl:reoY rmmY sPWrF . u■r X6 ■XFd 4LQx■E ff FIdIWI � 6YEC LWF DP CWRA'AIIY YRH .PF P1C XOLWWYFlMLFO[ Zp[ XnmRiFl[M m FAQ W 1®Fm® wF N11.rC4 Xf➢IfOXLiD �IPEZE �[ A GYFF WAtAY nCIN £YFA STFICXN[ � t,tenar AEE.vuu sY war xl0r ttMJOC 4I IQt1w FFE, ,Ff1 v W W 1 MEOLS WXK L9PIETE NiE,E GIF YLLK ./ ■Y -.E/e�M W-W E 0.m vLLK ./ mY rF1t ngGrr, tlW+,etE N,GI-Cfi YI/ WC16111L SWRL PoNI eFeIFAILL 9Wnf vPNr nrf auc IFWn2e Mi liaY C■1c116JamYF ml3ulc Y[FI WIIiMr'AYlA WmO-F ram—. � FEWrrw.:tev iwmul. nrx-wY PY1P F�mY OIWIx Rx[.. sXucnNF i�� [IEv'AMY 4 SiD nlyaliY[:�cvtimY CFHTFIC F.1Ki[YT nEvamY 6' IIPi[: SRN wsXYc W[cr,W Q CXWr.K 0.AY x,YP,Gv^m npEnq :.rz SYP.OLS MC PA91W uXiS PEWIT �rEEEaKxvin AMENDMENT TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - PL20140002416 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK PART OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 49, SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY OWNER. COLLIER COUNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E-, SUITE 101 NAPLES, FL 34112 LOCATION MAP SITE MAP NIWW .�F rr .ap lYA111E q11. N M M m pm uxey 1� r 1 Stantec 3510 KRAFT ROAD, SURE 200, NAPLES FL 34106 AHOAE 234644 M CEMCATE OF AUIRORQATION 027013 . wwwsWft c m m4hAwl�9ned by Oh F. BIor-dn Data: 2ozaas�>v 121 W7-0E'00' .enmeurv: 1'E]R:�IR9i�ex vab PERM1771NG AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN SET ISSUE DATE MAY 2024 �-Y 164t" V W �4-ti �W51�yAPfI N[�,=KF�+E %9ki tYn KNMP.FIn.IY �+t w6e-e 227(M"670I iA�_y INOEx 4Jx3E: N 2024? 22704t6701-03C-0OICY Page 481 of 745 Rmie4wtlena npPm.W Fx. Fy��zree �,�• - r- Pvmrtleuv.e sm�a Rwrue PL2023mP1379 sr M PL202410A1ad ie. iwarz. L� Lw�e��evm nm Pik r�.v,me.rm,n„ - BEIE&EL_EE])8 " RI6A&'Ad1AA�RS2,�.a w'19.V4:4W/'n'pl�� 6C'� °°•n. �aaia�r--"e�nrn�nmmmaw� AA11164fli'� m:a --.:- a W, i 9 .._ wa .,. .snm ma.c..wua.nm m ws-V:M.��rsw�RR-M.Q SVaL.V.wa..laYF_LL�_WarL ee. J�6958�!'J,R R.ITd""" Stantec 511E utl e r. m.ner mwo �ar'� nw C� y �� ��m vmm nom w,wa�.r y r®d_em� •�w enw e.s.e.e..w.ramw y��_.m w.weow wmm a_w`wiW.. ru,.n w o � rirr.s�. u4.�i 6e.1.w�ia w�aw.�•e.�i:a COWER COUNTY SURSIMIIVI CdIPlFlde MO RNAL _a..�rsrn en ww�.�w m 4'N�.'fY�fL°Ae —SOL- Mm s��..www..,..�e.ew... �,�w� •�.ww.. ..o<w�o�s w.w.. �m minn—artamim�-°a�te�riiim� GENERAL NOTES Page 482 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 LEGEND -m%%. FzAIh l CLJ%lii• A I • F W {ll'i ti-u it W N U yT + Y y k rJi - ih1� Uw r1 4 _ r it I I �. �� _ I —art _ —. = � _ � ��� • ' �� HAUL RQUIE camivanow AINESS 1 IWfr P%CppUqU: wAL BE IN MWJMGE sail MWER G4U PrS ULWDNAX 11711- —rMw tr WQ01,E ke!� rrrrwwffn %iL ,ask w2m a-mm rnn r, 7 F.i1I om •_li i %av 7lPfJ r r., m-n -? m ina -1 w rffmamm imu Fluu r,-�7W : mbr.-rN jrArw MTi • 11h sf•YI''r : ,j ArAwcom rum .Jiff +umm ILPIShTTJr w% d, !3 rx"1r-n rx ■ r IQ. !;!LU I r,, vmw L ro rw Ti r mw it m iIr -rr rr !:r m-r)pw r pi Fem r-Awmfrr I AU KR—L 0- DF� ZMiTW: k ALLY-1.--TMuq¢ !+q' S-EF+ K, FSt ditiL # Peru,w:w 4✓ E-j)R Lman w AL4ft&RI JLUM"I !l - 3 1L It Un KMMLr AIW elf 6%IL L Ud -Nt 1'Fa3•7.1W 4MbkIL t}M; monbikm acyi sY' J.;u !P'I 31Y.LL1 L)7 n- LL In L75wkv:. moratrt-c imm IU:#miLm sMLL mil LL C.Af IMLLLI 4!0 F R I CI%M. AIKY F'.1';WO&Y K&XQ-Fr:i J'I kYii WI FM W 1t I7F1719 off OJT WPM IIJk FXHLW= AQ1%r Y_ s i6i=.q= mLl1 @r ray rr.rn m 4i7FJ•1L r7 mm 71LVWLML}41 iF -1'.+r 1a^ Rti1PS6 YILI Ar AURH n- 10 CY-0 n •?MYP4 W- � TD ++�+ f3�*!�TRtF,r > alp VMtAKPffRY4 1W-Irs1� dAi 11) LgWLIk I,wm 7YE EF&& 4k *IEft HaUb, k' ,rtpL NW&u .ad'Ndra: fi r -wodmL aw x vmm Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Page 483 of 745 C'ollirr C'nunt, AlireexeiA [ anpp'. uFor Y, II" freu»rr Pm,rtbsrurte n.o•iin a PL20230002379 m W1OMMO W6 •••,_. I i ' i III I I I III I � I III I ' 'll I �I II I w.aa u� a 1 LMeuo I i I I I i I III I 1 I PIm.Es1 e uNl WN` III ---- 040 Af0MRM {I u H OR w KUVR A.P -W EM onsmxioU W.11vrr Prs-n {3 t1M�M IX CCOW[R CIXINY PA= uo_ sus 10) PF➢ESlidell CR � � Ax6Y-W E}IIRr1 u xq rc ,.a PoIO 3 - �vem - N enAwp� PIRIEEr HMIINflY um � II — — ' xl a m �ol.rt ...+ArAwr�Arw. COWER COUYtante COUNTY DOVERNNENr OPERATIONS BUSINESS PARK wDOWER PERWITING BOUNDARIES 4i/OtH0701 r 06 •sA Page 484 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix C: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 129 Page 485 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park - Excavation Permit Modifications - TIS - December 2025 INITIAL MEFTING CHECKLIST Suggestion, Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items tliat do not apply, or NIA mitt applicable). Bate: November 26, 2025 Time: NIA Location: NIA - Via Email People Attending: Name. Organization, and 'Telephone Numbers 11 Cecilia Varga, Collier County Growth Man.tgcment Division 2) Norman Trebi]cock, TCS 3) Cipjan Maluescu. TC5 Study Preparers Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTDE, PE firganizatioa.- Trebileock Consultinw Solutions. PA Address: 2800 Davis Boulevard. Suite. 200, Naples- FL 34104 Telephone Number: 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewers Name & Title: Cecilia Varga, Development Review Organization. Collier County Transmutation Planning Depart nient Telephone Number: 239-252-2613 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Downrite Engineering Inc Address: 14241 SW 143`' C.t. Miami. ILL 33I96 'felcphunc Number: 786-493-0274 Proposed Develntxnent: Name: Collier County Government Operations Business Park - Excavation Permit fEK) Mollification to Allow Excavated Material Removal Location- 3959 City Coate Blvd N. Naples, Collier County (refer to Figure I) Land Use Type: F.xeavation (Approved) - Hauling Operations ITF, Code #k: NIA Description: 5tonnw'ater treatment faeilit,V cxcavatiun uperations are ct.uzcnily approved for the subject site (Excavation Pernut No. FL202'40001696). 'Ihc dvveloperpropuses to modify the permit to allow the excavated material to he removed from the project site. Upon approval, 11ie proposed excavation will be permitted for the removal of approximately I IflM0 cubic yards (cy) ol'OVOrhurdc.n material from the suhiccL site. Page I of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 130 Page 486 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 The hauling activities will have a maximum lifespan of 6 months and will be aerating from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM (10 hours), Monday through Friday. The excavated material will be hauled to the following locations: 1. The Renaissance Hall at Old Course — west of Collier Blvd. and south of Golden Gate Pkwy.. Naples, Collier County (+1- 40.000cy) 2. Home Depot — 11800 Tarniami Trail East. Naples, Collier County (+1- 15.000cy) 3. 5175 Maple Ln, Naples. Collier County (+1- 33.000cy) 4. Gator Circle at 37"' St, Cape Coral. Lee County (+1- 15,000cv) 5. Entrada. Cape Coral, Lee County (+1- 7,000cy) Figure 1— Project Location Map Zoning: NIA Existing: Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPLID — CC Ord. 17-01 Comprehensive plan recommendation: No chance Requested: approval of the proposed excavation hauling operations Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study type: Since projected net new external AM or PM project traffic is less than 50 two- way, peak hour trips, this study qualifies as a Small Scale TIS. The TIS will include trip generation. traffic distribution and assignments. The report will provide existing L,OS and document the impact the proposed change will have on designated arterial and collector roads. The TIS will he consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures and will address the Collier County Code of Ordinance Sec. 22-111 (a) (3) f. Site Access — One existing connection to City Gate Blvd N which was previously approved. Study TNpe: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ® Minor TIS ❑ Maior TIS ❑ Page 2 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 131 Page 487 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Study Area: Boundaries: Based on the projectes zone of influence. The proposed truck illustrated in Figures 2A. 2B, 2C, 2D and 2E. Additional intersections to be analyzed: NIA Build Out Year: 2026 Planning Horizon Year: 2026. Analysis Time Periods): Peak Hour, Peak Direction Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: 110.000 CY per 6-month period (20 woi month). assuming 18 CY trucks and I0-hour workdays creates 102 trucks daily tri s . Reductions in Trip, Generation Rates: None: NIA: Pass -lay trips: NIA_ Internal trips: NIA: Transit use: NIA_ Other: NI Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2024 AUIR Site -trip generation: Based on max daily two-way daily trips of 102 trips over workday. A 10% increase adjustment is considered to account for any vend fluctuations in hauling operations. Expected 12 peak hour trigs. Enter -Exit: Enter: 6: Exit 6 Trip distribution method: 100% to each site based on projected route [Figures 2, 2D and 2E). Traffic assignment method: project trip Reneration with back rg ound erowth Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning movements: Site Access — NIA. Figure 2A — Destination Location #1- Proposed Truck Route Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 132 Page 488 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Figure 2B — Destination Location #2- Proposed Truck Route Figure 2C — Destination Location #3- Proposed Truck Route Page 4 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 133 Page 489 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Figure 2E — Destination Location #5 - Proposed Truck Route Page 5 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 134 Page 490 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Special Fealnres: {from preliminary study or prior experience} Accidents locations; NIA Sight distance: N/A Queuing: NIA Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs; N/A On -site parking needs: NIA Data Sources: C(' 2024 AUIR: ('C' Traffic Uounts Base maps: NIA Prior study reports: N/A Access policy anti jurisdiction: NIA Rcvic:w process; N/A Requirements: NIA MiSCel1ane0LJs: N/A Small Scale Study No Fee 3S Minor Study - $750.00 M.ijor Study - $1,500.M Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional lntcrsections - 5500.00 each Al! fens will be agreerd is during she Methodology meeting and muss be paid to Transpvriemon prlur to ❑rtr sign•aff «n the application. SIGNATURES MoYVk.2 vu T Y Ur-CC Study Preparcr Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page G of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 135 Page 491 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Coi tier County Tmff is impact Study Review 1 �ee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Suflicitucy Reviews. Fees fix Alifional ineetings or other optional survlces are also provided below. Methodolomy Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement. including review of suhmitted trip gene rat ton estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a ` Sn3alI Scale Study" deteruliunliou, Written approval/corua s oil a proposed wethodolpgy statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, ainendod methodology stawnient, and one rneeting in Collier C OUnt.y, if nCCdcSl. "Small Scale Study" ReAew- No Additional Fee (Ineltides one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the ntethodolrogy review, the applicant nuy subutil the study. The r06ew includes: a concurronLy dewrrnination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance wdh trip generat.iori, dis0hut.ion and maxiniutn threshold compliance. "Minor 5tudv Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the ;ubntitied Iraffic ana[vsis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmatilon of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, cone urreney dewn n inati on, con fir ma[irm tof con lniWell imps, ovements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of of?' -site- imlm-ovements within die right-of-way, ,review of sire access and circulation, aird prelyaration and review. of "sufficiency" cotnments/questions. "Major Study Review" - $1,301) Fee (Includes I wo intersection analysis and two sufficiencv reviews) Review of the submitted tsuffic. analysis includes: field visit to site, con fin nation of trip generation. special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assigpinent, concur'ency determination, conlirruation of conyttitted improvements. review of traffic volume data c oll ected/assern bled. review of traffic growth analysis, review of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary irnproveruent proposals and associated cost estimal.vs, and prepauatiou tend review of up In Iwo rounds of "SulTiciency" Coll inienGs/queslions and/nr recnnimcnded condilions of approval. "AddiIIoonaI inIerse01on Review" - $500 Fee The review of add iticaml intersections shall include the stume paranielers as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and Shall apply to each interseetion above the first two intersections included in One "Major Study Review' "Additional Sufficienev Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional lee Prior to the completion of the review. Page 7of7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 136 Page 492 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix D: Collier County FY25 - FY29 Five Year Work Program/CIE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 137 Page 493 of 745 ti rD n c a ti 0 ti Ql Page 494 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix E: Collier County 2024 AUIR Attachment G Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 139 Page 495 of 745 2024 AUIR Updat Listed below are the roadway links that are currently deFlcierit based on existing volumes and the trip bank or a 2024 Exist ID# Map Yeas Roadway From To Trip Bank F 17.0 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 24 20.2 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road 1-75 28 26.0 Goodletts-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4 34.0 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 749 36.1 Collier Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway 148 36.2 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road 123 43.2 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 598 44.0 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6B3 45.0 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 822 62.0 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 0 66.0 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 4 67.2 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road 175 13 88.0 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 67 92.0 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 235 99.0 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 83 119.0 Oil Well Road Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 1066 120.0 it Well Road Everglades Boulevard Desoto Boulevard 687 121.1 Oil Well Road Desoto Boulevard Oil Well Grade 664 132.0 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road 8th Street NE 289 136.0 Everglades Boulevard Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 11 Page 496 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix F: South US 41 TCEA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 141 Page 497 of 745 STH AVE S' LDAVIS 41 ° 84 - r — � o , r Public Commercial Residential Total Acres �i � � �r �� - 93.07 453.52 429.5 976.09 I 9.53% 46.46% 44.00% 100% - 0— o ni E# Is It J.— IM j Z 41 - t 1�- r' M� t o N THOMASSON DR RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD H W_+ AMENDED - NOVEMBER 14, 2023 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 0.9 9�, (Ord. No. 2023.60) Miles 0 3 M ppng'. Beth Yang AICP G,w[ M ana gemeni Department Fil _F' I_TCEA U641 Update.—d l` - Bate.dz,Be,2g2a - Vacmt Parcels [:3TCEA Egpdary TR - 4 o�yaho ic),te yT� uyle �1 R.develgpment overlay South US 41 Transportation All Parcels Count —1725(1001), Sum of acres -975.09(1001) 0 Mixed Vse Acnvlty oenter 3obdistdd Vacant Count= 234 (13.51), Sum of acres= 105.55 (10.81) —Ex�at�pp7�pa�tRpptea Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Non -Vacant Count =1491 (354/)Sum ofacres =37554 (892,) ---�= Arleria VCollector Roads Page 498 of 745 77 z ° -I 0 41 �. r m RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD ~ c m rr Q THOMASSON DR _ $ _ C ..., RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD m ,, Ems R pl Psrlm- Its Ji. a -•-�: __ Coh�nai4-.�nlf�Tup-J, �I� �� 'ice) AP i i 4Sl5RAL PKWY 9 GlutVA Jm a J l` Y 41 _y,-nlritre.> cti, y X.�, J % � r OBI * - T—� b LELY DR r �Lk�we j m O X Public Commerciall Residential Total Acres 406.42 626.73 181.08 1214.23 33.47% 51.62% 14.91% 100% m WA 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Miles GISM gipping. herb V eng, AICP Or.Ah Mana9emenr pep il—t File. Final_TCEA V841_Map4b.-d Dare. 03!0v2024 1 Imo` [.,,p_:. �..-•u AMENDED- NOVEMBER 14,2023 )Ord. No. 2023-60) Vacant Parcels TCEABounlary EM Mixed -use Aetivity Center Subdistrict Existing Transit Poutes Arterial/Collector Roads TR 4.1 South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) ALLPARCELS Court, 640(100%) Sum ofacres =1214.23(100%) VACANT Court 106)16.69d) Sum ofacres =171.39 (14. 1°h) NON -VACANT Court 534)83.491,) Sum ofacres =1042.84(85.9%) Page 499 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix G: East Central TCMA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 144 Page 500 of 745 rD s 0 0 O c D3c 0 0 c 0 0 D f • f _ PINE RIDGE RD Tr 11 � !I[ r — tT ` - �. GREEN BLVDij ty ix Lu O ItI�•- _-_`-J GOLDEN GATT; PItY- AMENDED - JUNE 13, 2017 (Ord. No. 2017-28) 71 RADIO RD IT $ _ s DAVIS BLVD _ 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 — _ �-- Miles _ - CUS MAPPING RrTM YANG. AICP • �mFwsc4 pTVIA aoimevr East Central Transportation Concurrency I ransportemn Ilse mnl} ;rr_Im �"� �"° "'`� "�° "" Management Area (TCMA) = 6a4p 7reiail ROWn ATL+�abCeban Rvatlt Page 501 of 745 Attachment I TCMA Report Collier County Transportation Concurrency Management System East Central TCMA AUIR ID Street Name From To 14.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Rc 15.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Bogy 16.1 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Rd. 16.2 Davis Boulevard Radio Rd. Collier Boulevz 20.2 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Rd. 1-75 21.0 Golden Gate Parkway 1-75 Santa Barbara Bogy 22.0 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevz 27.0 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevz 31.2 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevz 32.1 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate P\ 32.2 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main 32.3 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal 1-75 Boulevard330 Collier 49.0 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Bouleva 54.0 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Part 55.0 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 67.2 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Rd. 1-75 58.0 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 Logan Bouleva 70.0 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Bogy 71.0 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Bouleva 76.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parl 77.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 78.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Bouleva 125.0 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevz Total Lane Miles: Lane Miles —1.00 VIC: Percent Lane Miles Meeting Standard 182.65 157.63 86.3% Page 502 of 745 Collier County Government Operations Business Park — Excavation Permit Modifications — TIS — December 2025 Appendix H: Hurricane Evacuation Routes Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 147 Page 503 of 745 w \ rD k o 2.5 5 10 15 Q \ } @s GIS Beth Yang Mapping:. j { � \r � ~ ; w� 4 [ 29 41 , \w !7 ,® �4 \ , ƒ / �\ m . \<p \ ° �.` Traffic Control Points TR.7 eee^�- COLLIER COUNTTransportationm__>amm_ ,ate. Water� _ Department 9 Ces ounty Boundary HURRICANE EVACUATION ROUTES Page 504 of 745 ,e Collier County July 22, 2024 Chrissy Mitchell 1412 JACKSON ST Suite 3 Fort Myers, FL 33901 Re: (Development) Excavation Permit No. PL20240001696 Collier County Government Operations Business Park Excavation Permit (EX) Section(s) 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Dear Applicant: THIS IS YOUR PERMIT AND MUST BE POSTED ON SITE In accordance with the authority given in County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E., Article IV, Sections 22-106-22-119, as amended, your application for a Development Excavation is hereby approved subject to the following stipulations: 1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -3.77 ft-NAVD. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of 0.23 ft-NAVD. 2. No excavated material shall be removed from the project site. 3. The lake littoral zone shall be created and planted as indicated on the Plan of Record and in accordance with County Ordinance 91-102 Section 3.05-10 as amended. 4. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E. shall be adhered to. 5. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the excavating operation, A Dewatering Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy provided to Engineering Review Services for approval prior to the commencement of any dewatering activity on the site. 6. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Development Review Division. 7. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a Vegetation Removal Permit, required by Land Development Code, Division 3.05 as amended shall be obtained from Collier County Environmental Services Division before work shall commence. 8. A 20 ft. maintenance easement shall be provided around the perimeter of the lake and a 20 ft. access easement to it shall be provided from a right-of-way. The easement shall be accessible to all maintenance vehicles. Since we are in receipt of the permit/ review fee in the amount of $ 1,587.02, this letter is your authorization to proceed with the excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above - mentioned stipulations. Page 505 of 745 This permit is valid for (1) year and must be renewed on the anniversary date of permit issuance. The Plan of Record for this excavation is titled " Collier County Government Operations Business Park" Sheets 1-31 of 31 prepared by Stantec, signed and sealed by Chris E. Brockmeier, P.E., on May 23, 2024. STIPULATION: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. This permit is conditioned on all other applicable state, or federal permits being obtained before commencement of the development. Performance guarantee not required per Code of Ordinances Section 22-115(a). Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (239) 252- 2417. Sincerely, Development Review Division Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2400 Page 506 of 745 Collier County June 26, 2025 Chrissy Mitchell 1412 JACKSON ST, Suite 3 Fort Myers, FL 33901 RE: Status Report, Renewal, and Inspection Fees Excavation Permit No. PL20240001696 Collier County Government Operations Business Park Excavation Permit (EX) Dear Applicant: In accordance with county ordinance number 04-55 Article IV as amended an annual status report and renewal fee and a monthly inspection fee is required 30 days prior to the anniversary date of the approved excavation permit. Refer to section 22-114 (e), (f), and (g). The renewal fee to cover the period from July 22, 2025 to July 22, 2026 for the above referenced excavation are due on June 22, 2025. The renewal excavation fee is $300.00 per year and the inspection fee is $200.00 per inspection. All fees will be due prior to final approval of the excavation project and release of any Bond. Also enclosed is an Annual Status Report for lake excavation. Please complete the form as required, see reporting requirements on second page of the form. A check made payable to Collier County Board of Commissioners, in the amount of $2,700.00 for the required fees and the completed Annual Status Report Form shall be submitted to: Collier County Growth Management Community Development Department Development Review Division Attention: Jack McKenna, P.E. 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 You may also pay on the GMCD Public Portal. Follow this link to the GMCD Public Portal Online Payments Job Aid: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb/GMDPublicPortalOnlinePaymentsJobAid.pdf If you have determined that the above referenced project has been completed. Please provide the required documentation to bring this excavation into compliance within 10 working days of receiving this letter. If we can be of any further assistance, contact our office at (239) 252-2417. Sincerely, aW&#W-e Growth Management Community Development Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 Page 507 of 745 _e) Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: APRIL 2, 2026 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Property Owner: Abdul Awan 1871 161h Street N.E. Naples, FL 34120 Agents: Karim Ismail ProudHouse Builders, LLC 923 Del Prado Boulevard, Suite 205 Cape Coral, FL 33990 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider rezoning 4.04± acres from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as Copperstone Estates RPUD to allow for up to 12 residential dwelling units. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject PUD, consisting of 4.04± acres, is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3 North'/2 and South'/2, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 1 of 13 Page 508 of 745 1 r ' PROJECT a 4 LOCATION _ f k# Ao L 3{11Lt jytL_ bland R I } VF L.h e $CM Location Map r, ALLING WA' CH RES $(n 18 J P U D ;k v ATR, PUD N E5 A POINTE MOTOR RE SFWMD CONSRV C E8MTCRd193 PG281A Petition Number: PL20250009053 Zoning Map r SITE LOCATION A wl PUD Page 2 of 13 March 5, 2026 PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD Page 509 of 745 RHI IYG rmcammy a+ HL4uL I ILln LOCATED IN O�ASTAL HIGH HAZARD ZONE, TOTALSITE IS LESS THAN 5 AC& GREATER THAN 2.5AC THEREFORE 25%PRESERVATION REQUIRED ' 64AC QF EXISTING NATIVE VECETATON X ljl$ (25%) =-0AI AC REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVATION PROVIDED, 0.47i AC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION 0% MIN OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR OVERALL PUD 0.5 X 4,04AC ' 2 42 AC MIN. RE13UIREU OPEN SPACE PROVIDER= 2.42t AC ZONING:C4 USE. COMMERCIAL C) ZONING: PUb USE REg10EN7LAL/ LAND USE SUMMARY ITEM AREA SSF? AREA (AC) TOTAL SITE TOTAL SITEAREA 176,1100 5F 4.04 AC 1 D0.00% RIGHT-OF-WAY 39,2DD SF 0.90 AC 22.27% PRESERVE 20.3005F 0.47AC 11-53% OTHER OPEN AREAS 23.300 SF 0.53 AC 1324% RESIDENTIAL (R) 93.200 SF 2.14 AC 52.96% 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUDJECT TO CHANGE THROUGH LOCAL AND STATE PERMITTING AT TIME OF SOP 2. PRESERVE5CAN BE USEDTOMEET THE LDC REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS IN { ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT F (LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS). PRESERVE SETBACKS UNITSCOUNT & DENSITY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT PRIMARY • 25' DENSITY: 3 PER AC ZONED: 35' ACCESSORY -iD MAX- UNITS, 12 IC,A r - \ 'I 10.4' TYPE "A" BUFFER WATER MA CEMENT P,} 15.0TYPE "D" BUFFER PROPOSP-0 CC' R664 0o 15.01 TYPE "B" BUFFER f •, NATIVE PRESERVE �_= dili f ZONING- A USE:VACANT ' 10.O' TYPE "A" BUFF INGR S/EGRESSL.. 15.0' TYPE "D" BUFFER ZONING: A USE: VACANT !y` C)�! PU Nl ( Sf ZONINGS CPuiD 'V7 F/ USE VACANT 4 a: C �. NI G- CPUD UF: OME PARKS. LEGEND: WATER MANAGEMENT Ft RESIDENTIAL AREA PRESERVE F INGRESSJEGRESS 4-0 ffM 1•�00 F . PROJECT: COPPERSTONEESTATESRPUU TITLE' EXHIBITC-CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN SHEET#: 1 * REVISIONS PAT Ft I Cl T REV 1 11-19-2025 PER COUNTY COMMENTS iN�rKiiRrM� C014PANY REV 2 41-16-2026 PER COUNTY COMMENTS �i An ByE§I`�if t2 1®R. HWf9,FWPoQ�91G� FFi01E.1»!7 S16L09B FAIL R9013]B-i15� 'AWN.MTPo 01BIfiJEenYGCOYlAffI.O011 !L lEId�1T1SS MASTER PLAN PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 3 of 13 Page 510 of 745 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks to rezone 4.04± acres of vacant land with an (A) zoning designation to the Copperstone Estates RPUD to allow for 12 residential dwelling units at a density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre. See Attachment A — Proposed PUD Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Multi -family residential development with a zoning designation of Falling Waters PUD with a density of 6.5 dwelling units per acre East: Vacant land with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) South: Tamiami Trail, a 6-lane, divided principal arterial roadway, and then vacant land with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A), and vacant land and a lake, and then single-family residences with a zoning designation of Artesia Pointe PUD with a density of 5.96 dwelling units per acre West: Vacant land with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) AERIAL PHOTO PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 4 of 13 Page 511 of 745 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone to allow a maximum density of 3 units per acre across the 4.04+/- acre site, or a maximum of 12 residential units. Development within the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows for a base density of 4 units per acre. However, the property is located within the Coastal High Hazard Area, a density of 1 unit per acre must be subtracted, resulting in a base density of 3 units per acre. Staff has determined that the applicant is complying with the goals and policies of the FLUE and has found the subject rezone petition consistent with the GMP. Please see Attachment B-GMP Consistency Review Memorandum for further information. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's January 13, 2026, Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2024 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity ofpermissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current A UIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has a significant impact if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links, the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff findings: According to the TIS provided with this petition, the proposed Copperstone Estates PUD will generate +/- 14 PM peak hour trips on the adjacent roadway, US-41 (Tamiami Trail East). The trips generated will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links: PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 5 of 13 Page 512 of 745 Roadway/Link Link Current Peak Projected P.M 2024 Level 2024 Hour Peak Peak of Service Remaining Direction Hour/Peak (LOS) Capacity Volume/Peak Direction Direction Project Traffic 1 US-41, Collier 3,100/EB 1/EB B 1,651 Tamiami Trail Blvd. to East/95.1 Joseph Lane Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is January 13, 2026; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2024 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Planning staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 1.64 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 0.41 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the Collier County Planning Commission's (CCPC) recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who, in turn, use them to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review. In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 0.41 acres (25% of 1.64 acres). The Master Concept Plan provides for an onsite 0.47-acre preserve in accordance with LDC 3.05.07. No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus); however, no evidence was found indicating trees were being utilized. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 6 of 13 Page 513 of 745 This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review because it does not fall within the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommend approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utility Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the south wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). Water and wastewater services are available via existing infrastructure within the adjacent right-of-way. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Developer commitments are listed in "Exhibit F" of the Copperstone Estates RPUD document under the "Utilities" section. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. School Review: A school review has been requested; the staff has no comments. Stormwater Review: Stormwater staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Historic and Archeological Preservation Board (HAPB) Review: The HAPB heard PUDZ- PL20250009053, Copperstone Estates RPUD on February 20, 2026, and voted 6-0 to approve the land use petition. Zoning and Land Development Review: As previously stated, the request is to rezone the property from the Agriculture (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit (RPUD) zoning district to allow for the development of 12 single-family residential units at 2.97 dwelling units per acre. While the LDC typically requires a minimum PUD area of 10 acres, the subject site qualifies for a smaller area of 4.04± acres under the Infill Parcels provision contained in LDC 4.07.02.A. The subject site shares at least two common boundaries with developed parcels. Staff has received confirmation from Comprehensive Planning that the subject site qualifies as infill, as the developed Falling Waters PUD is located north of the subject site, and the developed Artesia Pointe PUD is located south of the subject site. Zoning staff has evaluated the proposed use related to intensity and compatibility. The proposed density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre is less than the adjacent multi -family Falling Waters PUD, with a density of 6.5 dwelling units per acre. It is also less than the nearby single-family residences at Artesia Pointe PUD, with a density of 5.96 dwelling units per acre. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 7 of 13 Page 514 of 745 The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned and actual building height of 35 feet, which is less than the building height of 50 feet (measured from the first finished floor of the building) in the Falling Waters PUD and similar to the building height of 35 feet in the nearby Artesia Pointe PUD. The proposed landscape buffers meet the minimum code. There is a proposed 15-foot-wide Type D landscape buffer along Tamiami Trail East (trees 30 feet on center and a 24-inch hedge along vehicular use areas). A 15-foot-wide Type B landscape buffer (trees 25 feet on center and a 6-foot- high hedge, fence, or wall) is proposed along the north property line adjacent to Falling Waters. A 10-foot-wide Type A landscape buffer (trees 30 feet on center) is proposed along the east and west property lines. Staff finds the proposed Copperstone Estates RPUD compatible with the adjacent properties. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the BCC, who, in turn, use them to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies, and future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this petition and has found it consistent with the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential and vacant land. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 8 of 13 Page 515 of 745 4. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezone necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to allow for the development of 12 residential units at 2.97 dwelling units per acre. 5. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. It is staff s opinion that the proposed change will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is compatible with adjacent land uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As previously stated, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Rezone will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the environmental resource permitting requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 8. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Rezone will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure that light and air are not seriously reduced in adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of the proposed preserve and open space areas should ensure that light and air are not seriously reduced in adjacent areas. 9. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff could find no evidence that the proposed PUD Rezone will adversely impact property values. 10. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The properties to the north and south are developed. The properties to the east and west are undeveloped. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the SDP approval process and PPL process, gives PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 9 of 13 Page 516 of 745 reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 11. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed PUD rezone can be found consistent with the LDC and the GMP. Thus, the proposed change can be deemed to be in alignment with public welfare and not a grant of special privilege. 12. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There are no substantial reasons why the property can not be used in accordance with the current zoning. 13. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed change is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 14. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff do not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 15. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or PPL processes, and as part of the building permit process. 16. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable GMP goals and objectives regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff who are responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and staff have concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) will be minimized. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 10 of 13 Page 517 of 745 17. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject single-family site is located on the northeast side of Tamiami Trail East. It is surrounded by single-family and multi -family residential land uses as well as vacant land. As previously stated, the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project. Improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. Z Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for Rezones in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this petition and has found it consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed landscaping and buffering standards are compatible with the adjacent uses. Staff has concluded that this Rezone will not change the project's compatibility, both internally and externally. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 11 of 13 Page 518 of 745 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas inexistence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the LDC's minimum requirement. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Water and wastewater mains are available along Tamiami Trail E. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the project. Any improvements to the CCWSD's water or wastewater systems necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the CCWSD at no cost to the County at the time of utilities acceptance. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of the first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including, but not limited to, any plats and/or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including road capacity and water and sewer services, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. There are no deviations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on November 24, 2025, at the Collier South Regional Library, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida. Approximately 60 residents attended the meeting, along with some virtually via ZOOM. Some residents opposed the proposed single-family homes. They were concerned about increased flooding in the area and the view of the proposed single-family homes from their residences. For further information, see Attachment C NIM Documents. PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 12 of 13 Page 519 of 745 COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on March 2, 2026. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDZ- PL20250009053, Copperstone Estates RPUD, to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: Attachment A -Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B-GMP Consistency Review Memorandum Attachment C-NIM Documents Attachment D-Application PUDZ-PL20250009053, COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD March 5, 2026 Page 13 of 13 Page 520 of 745 ORDINANCE NO. 26 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 12 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, APPROXIMATELY 3200 FEET EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 4.04 +/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PL20250009053) WHEREAS, Karim Ismail of ProudHouse Builders LLC, representing Abdul Awan, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a project to be known as the Copperstone Estates RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of [25-CPS-02701/2004139/1 ]65 Copperstone Estates RPUD/PL20250009053 2/26/26 Page 1 Page 521 of 745 12 single-family residential dwelling units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2026. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA an , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi F. Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A: Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F: Developer Commitments [25-CPS-02701/2004139/1 ]65 Copperstone Estates RPUD/PL20250009053 2/26/26 Page 2 Dan Kowal, Chairman Page 522 of 745 COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES Regulations for development of this RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. 1�:�►�iI��L�1����1 A maximum total of 12 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single -Family Residential Dwelling Units. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the RSF districts including, but not limited to: a. Garages and Carports. Garages may only be constructed as accessory units to single-family dwellings; there shall be no rental space in the accessory garages. b. Swimming Pools and Spas. c. Screen Enclosures. d. Utility Buildings. 2. Access control structures. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, parks, dog parks, playfields, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Recreational courts including bocce ball, handball, padel, pickleball, tennis, racquetball and the like. Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 1 of 7 Page 523 of 745 COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT B LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for land uses within the development shall be as stated in these development standard tables. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP), subdivision plat, or Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA). TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 6,000S.F. PER UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 600 S.F. PER UNIT MINIMUM SETBACKS: MINIMUM FRONT YARD 25 FEET MINIMUM SIDE YARD 7.5 FEET MINIMUM REAR YARD 20 FEET MINIMUM PUD SETBACK 20 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED 35 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT ACTUAL 35 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MINIMUM SETBACKS: MINIMUM FRONT SPS* MINIMUM SIDE SPS* MINIMUM REAR 10 FEET MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET MINIMUM PUD SETBACK SPS* MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED SPS* MAXIMUM HEIGHT ACTUAL SPS* Note): * SPS = Calculated same as principal structure for the zoning district. 1. Setbacks must comply with the required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures provided in the Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article III of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivision plat approval. Note: Nothing in this PUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 2 of 7 Page 524 of 745 NATIVE PRESERVE CALCULATION LOCATED IN COASTAL HIGH HAZARD ZONE, LAND USE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE IS LESS THAN 5 AC & GREATER THAN 2.5 AC ITEM AREA (SF) AREA (AC) TOTAL SITE THEREFORE 25 %PRESERVATION REQUIRED 1.64 AC OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25 (25%) = 0.41 AC REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVATION PROVIDED= 0.47± AC TOTAL SITE AREA 176,000 SF 4.04 AC 100.00% OPEN SPACE CALCULATION 60% MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR OVERALL PUD RIGHT-OF-WAY 39,200 SF 0.90 AC 22.27% 0.6 X 4.04AC = 2.42 AC MIN. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PROVIDED = 2.42± AC PRESERVE 20,300 SF 0.47 AC 11.53% OTHER OPEN AREAS 23,300 SF 0.53 AC 13.24% ZONING:C4 USE: COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (R) 93,200 SF 2.14 AC 52.96% NOTES:1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE THROUGH LOCAL AND STATE PERMITTING AT TIME OF SDP. 2. PRESERVES CAN BE USED TO MEET THE LDC REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT F (LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS). PRESERVE SETBACKS UNITS COUNT & DENSITY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT vQ� lSO O �� ZONING: PUD O�/� SOP USE: RESIDENTIAL O PRIMARY - 25' DENSITY: 3 PER AC ZONED: 35' NING: A E:VACANT ACCESSORY -10' MAX. UNITS: 12 ZONING. UD USE: RESIDE TIAL PROPOSED 60' ROW 15.0' TYPE "B" BUFFER 10.0' TYPE "A" BUFFER R NATIVE PRESERVE (TYP.) WATER MA GEMENT TYP.) ZONING: A USE:VACANT 15.0' TYPE "D" BUFFER 10.0' TYPE "A" BUFFER INGR S/EGRESS <•,;; 15.0' TYPE "D" BUFFER ZONING: A O USE:VACANT OQ ZONIN PU US DEN I ,40 ZONING: CPUD 119 USE:VACANT F C E: CAN O\NI G: CPUD A USE: E ME PARKS Ll LEGEND: 0 WATER MANAGEMENT R RESIDENTIAL AREA o11 goo zo too 0 PRESERVE 4-► INGRESS/EGRESS ---- BUFFER 1"=200 F . PROJECT: COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD I TITLE: EXHIBIT C - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN SHEET #: 1 * REVISIONS PATRIOT REV 1 11-19-2025 PER COUNTY COMMENTS ENGINEERING COMPANY REV 2 01-16-2026 PER COUNTY COMMENTS 780 5th AVE S. I SUITE 200 \ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 PHONE: (239) 308-0099 / FAX: (239) 308-4750 W W W,PATRIOTENGINEERINGCOMPANY.COM FL EBR# 37157 Page 525 of 745 COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of 176,000.78 square feet (4.040 acres) and is comprised of the following parcels: Parcel ID: 00724880001 & 0072452002. The legal description of the property is as follows: PARCEL 1: Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18'29" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said right of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'46" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. MM PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 4 of 7 Page 526 of 745 COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT E LIST OF DEVIATIONS Intentionally Left Blank Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 5 of 7 Page 527 of 745 COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 6119 The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. GENERAL: A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is ProuclHouse Builders LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not berelieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. B. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) C. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC Sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. In order to meet the landscape buffer requirements, a Type buffer along the southern boundary and a Type 'A' buffer along the eastern property boundary has been identified on the master plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided to meet the buffer Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 6 of 7 Page 528 of 745 requirements. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. TRANSPORTATION: B. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 14 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. PUBLIC UTILITIES: A. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined by County Manager or designee during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. B. At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the water distribution/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow to the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined by County Manager or designee during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades. Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 7 of 7 Page 529 of 745 Co e-r Co-t4kmy Growth Management Community Development Department Zoning Division —Comprehensive Planning Section CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Gundlach, Planner III, Zoning From: Parker Klopf, Planner III, Comprehensive Planning Date: February 19th, 2026 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PL20250009053 PETITION NAME: Copperstone Estates Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a Rezone of Agricultural land within the Urban Residential Subdistrict a Residential Planned Unit Development called Copperstone Estates. LOCATION: The subject PUD, consisting of +/- 4.04 acres, is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3 North '/z and South '/2, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PROJECT LOCATION Location Map ydll as c la ALLING WATERS ACH RESOR ® PUD ' SITE LOCATION A e A® 7d .o WI G A CY S PUD O� PUD N ES A POINTE MOTOR G RE �� BFWMD MNSRV CP E9MT DR 4193 PU 2R78 Zoning Map Page 530 of 745 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: According to the Future Land Use Map the subject property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The subject property is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The County considers the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as a geographical area lying below the elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 2011 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study. If the project lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area, one dwelling unit per gross acre shall be subtracted from the eligible base density of four dwelling units per acre. As stated above, Within the applicable Urban Designated Areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. Density within Urban designated areas that are subject to the CHHA are limited to 3 dwelling units and acre unless certain criteria of the density rating system can be met. This rezone proposes to increase the density from 0.2 units an acre permitted by the Agricultural designation to 3 units an acre, which is at the maximum that could be requested without any additional density bonuses. Furthermore, the development of a single-family neighborhood within this area is deemed to be comparable and compatible with adjacent single and multi -family developments. Based on staff review of the proposed amendment and supporting materials, it is the determination of Comprehensive Planning Staff that the proposed rezone is consistent with the goals and policies of the Future Land Use Plan. Relevant FLUE Objectives and policies are stated below (in italics); each policy is followed by staff analysis [in bold]. FLUE Policy 5.4: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. As stated above the maximum allowed density within the Urban Residential Area is 4 DU/A, the proposed project has a proposed density of 3 DU/A. Staff have concluded that the requested density is less than allowed by the FLUE making it consistent with the GMP. FLUE Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any additions to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. The proposed development is within the Urban Designated Area of the Future Land Use Map and is serviced by utilities provided by the Collier County. Approval of this project is not urban sprawl and development at the proposed density is a good utilization of the existing infrastructure from a planning perspective. Page 531 of 745 FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). The proposed project will consist of single-family structures. The property immediately north of the subject property is existing multi -family development. To the south is the US 41 and single family attached style development that is considered to be part of the Artesia Pointe PUD. The conceptual PUD master plan demonstrates appropriate project buffers consistent with that required in the LDC, and the proposed development standards will ensure that the units are setback from the adjacent roadway and nearby residences to insure the compatibility. FLUE Objective 7, and implementing Policies 7.1-7.4 Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable. It is the opinion of staff that the proposed rezone does promote smart growth policies by using existing urban designated land and adhering to the existing development character of the Collier County. CONCLUSION: The proposed rezone to a Residential Planned Unit Development with a limitation of 3 units an acre is complementary and compatible with surrounding development. Based upon the above analysis, the proposed rezone has been deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Page 532 of 745 NIM RPUD_ PL20250009053: Summary of Meeting 1. Purpose of the Meeting • This was a Neighborhood Information Meeting regarding a proposed rezoning and residential development on a parcel near Henderson Creek and existing communities (e.g., Falling Waters, White Cypress, etc.). • The applicant/developer, their civil engineer, and a county representative attended to: o Explain the concept plan (low -density, high -end single-family homes). o Discuss stormwater, flooding, buffers, and wildlife. o Answer questions about the process, timeline, and public input. 2. Project Overview (Developer / Engineer) Type of project: o Low -density single-family homes, described as "luxury" homes. o Rough range discussed: around 8-12 homes on the site (final count to be determined through detailed design and market analysis). • Home size & pricing: o Anticipated house sizes roughly in the 3,000-4,000 sq.ft. range. o Pricing was described as being in roughly the "around a million plus" range (exact figures still under market analysis). • Site layout (conceptual): o Homes would be laid out within building envelopes shown as boxes on the plan. o Those boxes represent the buildable area within setbacks, not the exact house footprint. Actual homes would be somewhat smaller than those boxes suggest. o There are green "open/leftover" areas on the plan: ■ One area is likely to stay preserve / buffer (county -mandated). ■ Another central area may be used for stormwater management and/or left as green space, depending on final engineering. Zoning: o The purchase of the property is contingent on the rezoning being approved. Page 533 of 745 3. Zoning & Approval Process (County Rep / Consultant) • Current stage: o The rezoning petition has been submitted and is under review. o A team of county subject -matter experts (engineers, environmental staff, etc.) is reviewing the application for compliance with: ■ Countycodes ■ State codes ■ Stormwater and water quality standards • Process steps explained: 1. Neighborhood Information Meeting (this meeting) —collect feedback and concerns. 2. Staff review — county staff issue comments; developer responds. 3. Planning Commission / Planning Board hearing — public hearing, advisory vote. 4. Board of County Commissioners hearing — final decision on the rezoning. • Timeline: o Developer suggested that, realistically, the case would likely reach the Board of County Commissioners sometime in the spring (subject to staff review and how quickly comments are resolved). o If approved and all permits were in hand, construction duration was estimated at roughly 12-16 months. 4. Public Access to Records (Sunshine / FOIA-type Questions) Residents asked whether: o The proceedings are subject to public records / "Sunshine" / open meetings laws. o They can review records and technical reports. County response: o Yes, the public can access documents; residents can: ■ Use the county's online "CityView" portal to view all submitted documents, staff comments, etc. • Make additional public records requests if needed. o The county rep indicated they can direct callers to the appropriate subject -matter experts for technical questions. Page 534 of 745 5. Notices & Who Was Invited • Some residents said they never received mailed notices despite being nearby. • Developer responded: o They used the mailing list provided by the county and sent notices to everyone on that list (around 26o mailings). o If some residents are outside the county -specified radius, they may not have been on that list. • This was noted as a fairness concern, especially since many owners are seasonal residents. 6. Stormwater, Flooding & Henderson Creek This was the biggest topic of the night. 6.3. Design Approach (Engineer) • The civil engineer explained the standard Florida stormwater design process: o They perform a pre -development analysis (existing conditions). o They design a post -development system that: ■ Meets or exceeds state and county requirements. ■ Holds more water on -site than under existing conditions. o They must demonstrate "no adverse impact" on surrounding properties. Regulatory standards discussed: o Homes are generally designed/placed at or above the ioo-year flood elevation (floodplain elevation). o Perimeter berms and stormwater ponds are typically designed for 25-year or similar design storms. o Any fill added to the site must be compensated by additional storage volume elsewhere (floodplain compensation), so they do not reduce net storage. Water discharge: o The site will discharge through a permitted outfall (referenced as a canal / 41 outfall / Henderson Creek system). o The engineer mentioned upcoming stricter state water -quality standards (starting around December 31 of this year), which they will have to meet in their design and permitting. 6.2 Residents' Flooding Concerns Residents raised several specific concerns: Page 535 of 745 • Existing flooding & hurricane events: o People described past storms where 18-19 inches of rain fell, the creek rose up to the road, and water spread into low areas. o They emphasized: ■ The area is already in a flood zone. ■ Many homes require flood insurance. ■ They worry that additional fill and impervious area will push more water onto neighboring properties. • Questions asked: o Will additional concrete / impervious area increase flood risk? o Will the site remain in a flood zone, or will the new homes be elevated out of it? o How will the design address Henderson Creek, levees, and downstream systems? o Will the developer coordinate with the local water / levee association about impacts? • Engineer's response (in substance): o They acknowledged that extreme events and storm surge (e.g., hurricanes) can overwhelm systems, and it is impossible to design for every conceivable extreme, but: ■ The project must meet all current standards and upcoming stricter standards. ■ The habitable floors of the homes will be above the designated flood elevation (likely by elevating the main living level and using the lower level as open or non -habitable). • They will hold more stormwater on -site than under existing conditions, using ponds and storage. o They have not completed full detailed engineering yet, but the commitment is to: ■ Design to state and county stormwater rules. ■ Provide on -site retention/detention so runoff is controlled. 7. Buffers, Walls, Preserves & Privacy Another major theme was screening and separation between the new homes and existing communities. 7.1 Existing / Required Buffers • One side of the property is adjacent to a native preserve. Page 536 of 745 o Because it is a native preserve, it is effectively treated as a buffer wider than the usual landscaped buffer (roughly 20 feet or more). • Developer noted that in that area the plan says "no buffer required" only because the native preserve itself functions as the buffer, not because there will be nothing there. 7.2 Additional Buffering Commitments • Residents (especially from White Cypress and surrounding neighborhoods) asked for: o Larger buffers between existing homes and the proposed homes. o Possibly walls or dense vegetation to improve privacy and reduce visual impact, and to separate from wildlife. • Developer's responses: o They agree it's in everyone's interest (both existing residents and future buyers) to have good visual and noise buffering. o They walked the site with a landscape architect to identify: ■ Existing invasive species to be removed. ■ Native / fast-growing species to plant for additional screening. o They stated an intent to exceed minimum buffer requirements by: ■ Enhancing the preserve edge. ■ Planting additional trees and landscaping beyond what the code strictly requires. 7.3 Possible Reconfiguration / Easements • There was a suggestion from residents to consider: o Swapping the location of some proposed lots and/or o Creating a wider buffer strip between communities (similar to another nearby project with a -70-foot buffer including a wall and water feature). • The developer: o Did not commit on the spot but said this idea is "within the realm of possibility". o Agreed to take the suggestion back, evaluate it with engineers and county staff, and see what is feasible within: ■ Site constraints, ■ Stormwater needs, and ■ County requirements. • There was also discussion of the combined distance between: o The back of existing homes and their internal road; and Page 537 of 745 o The new property line and the first proposed homes. o Roughly, people were talking about around 5o feet or more of combined separation (existing right-of-way plus new buffer), with requests to increase that if possible. 8. Wildlife (Bears & Other Species) • Residents mentioned bears are present in the area, including reports of a serious bear incident in Marco Island. • Questions: o Will prospective buyers be informed about wildlife risks (e.g., bears)? o Will the design leave wildlife corridors or create conflicts? • The conversation acknowledged: o The site is near preserve and natural habitat. o There is a need to balance development and safety. • No formal commitment was made on wildlife disclosure language, but the concern was clearly recorded as something to consider in marketing and design. 9. Questions on Occupancy & Use • A resident asked whether there would be restrictions on occupancy, e.g.: o Could multiple families share a "luxury" home? • Developer response (in substance): o Any limits would generally be governed by local ordinances / housing codes. o They did not propose any special occupancy rules beyond existing regulations. io. Community Meetings, HOA Involvement & Follow -Up • A board member from White Cypress explained that many residents could not attend this meeting (timing close to Thanksgiving, seasonal owners, people traveling). • They invited the developer to: o Hold a separate, dedicated meeting at the White Cypress clubhouse. o Use their audio/visual setup to show plans to a larger group (they can host -i30+ people and project the plans on large TVs). • Developer: o Expressed willingness to attend another HOA meeting. Page 538 of 745 o Welcomed ongoing dialogue and feedback. ■ "Wish list" idea: o Residents proposed compiling a list of requested conditions (e.g., buffer dimensions, landscaping, walls, traffic concerns). o Developer said they have time in the process to receive such input over the next couple of months and consider what can reasonably be accommodated, while acknowledging: ■ They won't be able to satisfy every concern, ■ But they want to respond to as many as possible. 11. Concerns About Overdevelopment & Housing Type A resident raised a broader concern: o The area already feels overdeveloped and traffic has worsened significantly in recent years. o They questioned whether the community needs more luxury estate homes versus affordable housing for local workers and families. Developer response: o If the site were proposed for affordable housing, other neighbors might object for different reasons (density, traffic, changing neighborhood character). o They argued that: ■ Given land cost and site constraints, low -density, high -end homes are the only financially viable option they see for this parcel. ■ More units (e.g., 40+ affordable units) would create its own set of community concerns about traffic and intensity. o They acknowledged this is inherently a no -win situation in terms of pleasing everyone but reiterated their goal of low unit count and high quality. 12. Wrap -Up ■ The meeting concluded with: o Acknowledgment that many questions remain to be finalized at the detailed design stage (exact buffer dimensions, final stormwater layout, amenities in green areas, etc.). o A commitment by the developer to: ■ Continue refining the plan based on county comments and neighborhood feedback. Page 539 of 745 • Explore options for additional buffer / reconfiguration. • Return for further discussion with HOAs if invited. • Residents were encouraged to: o Monitor the case through the CityView portal. o Organize input and submit written comments / wish lists. Attend the future Planning Commission and County Commission hearings when scheduled. Page 540 of 745 IV�) oddvess1� D(kohe: I � LA bU� S tee N -2- o< 2,( J o (n Lo v- 2,2 TLA 5" Vr Ae 3 �vc,kxj 6EAdL1ErJ &kq-z, C ,22,11,bAj4l" (2� 0 I c�rffa4j`xr s o -7 A7 Page 541 of 745 A/a woe PLd d Cw1&I'z 3�lme� AIU,11V ERiduriD Le,50-y^ Me -Van J j9Q,-,t--k 3c V)f4 4 NA - FL 6 SID r2 vo Or- 8 Cv 7 �/ �v��%Hz �/ ✓G 0 Page 542 of 745 M)vv,e ; Vjo1vL-oss • ?il (,) 0 � ew, a ).- T IL (A [Iclzc if 11�111 r-06I ),� � _0 I � �qj k- -7 _- u -013 � &Fa -If -� �� r bf r30'/5 it A�4 � U,t l 1 �-C' (.C-Go *7 cktife- MVA�� / �, 7' Vt, -?f 6-72S- 67S6 703, 3�� (p6 3 Z �G, a Yu z f-)Oy 7 7 -/(-00 ksAt,Itz��� V-eP, zv K MoN 1 OUR f 9 6"<6 Yon Il,CoYll �/ 2--M f -4� � V a �4•�I 6c/hR4 w. t c 732-128Z8�S y� Page 543 of 745 TDTALSOE IE L MS P OI S 1L L OLE.ATERTHW 2 S AC IMMUOR wNpmpan'Y1GLIFewwo IMAC CFE.MTK6KAT1E UJIl11Y0�¢ j�lJI AeIIl3 4 MrWNaW ATKwrFWRMp-(IA2e AC OPE N SPLIC E C,LL CULITIOM INMIL OPEN W UN-REG M A tMil "fir.. 1. ir.Yr afrrffr a i iNiF.IitidFiN HIMFOh f C-06MIEPoC� �OFlllf WIO USE: REEICE NFLIL LAND USE SLWKMZ' rrLm AREA jSFj AREA fAGO TOTAL SITE TOTAL SITE AREA 1TOAD SF 4,G4AC IDD.DO% OPEN SPACE 52,1300SF 121 AC 30.00'. PRESERVE 16,30DSF 13.42 AG 1OAO'. RESIDENM L (RF 104.PGDSF 2.41 AEG 5B.50% PKRIM 1. THIS PLAN ISCCWEFUALINHATLIFEANDISSLalEGTTfl GHAhIGiETFFIO i1 LIRE L AM STATE PERHT`FI- AT TTAIE DF SOP. P NDELFFERFLEWRE6WHEREFliESER.EJ13LRSFR6PERIYUNE P RESER4E SETOWGIf5 LINTS,QX &I3Eh TY MAX OULEWIS HEIGHT FRIMARi-15' DENSM 3 PER AC ioFEa 35 AOGESSMY-17 PAU.UWIS:12 ~k 150 YPE W BUFFER 1OZ TYPE'R' BUFFER f R 4MATER NAT ME PRESERVE MM EAIENT k 15.L7'TYPE -D' 9UFFER -� ti k. ING RESS h NO REOUIRM * NOPLIFFER M CMD "QIIE PA KEt LEGEND: a wATFR MANAGEMENT R RESumnigL AREA F Q PRESERVE 4* SStEGRESS r= BUFFER 1 ti20O I PRQIECT: E0PPE1 ymw ESTATES NAA I TIT.E: EXHIBIT C - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN SFEET ik REVI PAT P.I o-r REYSI1 W2D25 PERCOUNTYCOMMENTS MM*MM�IIY1Mw iMIFAIW .� ■.wt,.I.u� was �aa�w. ma-Iro u Page 544 of 745 pt CONCEPTUAL PLAN — FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY ------------- —_--- o iID i jr- * Vt f f SITE PLAN LAVID UT CONCEPT r COPPERSTONE ESTATES Page 545 of 745 f i I Au "'- '�!' •.:. .0 + ar vier - ' y '� ` � a 1.:. vita - i � ��� ,:+� - � �._��. � �.�r� �' - •' .�5' � - ��r , —01 V T pr ` ^.- ( J ).. J�•ry^^y%%yam _ +r _ •„ t� ! p` �y - >_1.. �sR.`•` .�` _ / .� - � i-x'. ya ;.r. i — .+Asti•„ � 1 }'�r.,r ''i ` - - , _ - `- 77 4k Out kv APO UAL PLANS O. ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES �qw . kip 'N� 4N 4`1 CA 7., CONCEPTUAL PLANS - FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Immll pppp� -040 �r ":!a wommomm, 'A q mm L =v � RIFI7� Off Zip- f yr, �4'- .:_.,� ';.f�,,;+�•� x IFA a rJ AMR—J . v 71 i r CIL1J � I � wrL A - --------- 0 ----------- Ut' 0 4il JL 4S 0 4W AP - I ljl;:: Mil im i . . . . . . . . I LL I i� k T Prw/; 47 ZvF? OAK Onto, .1buL L,-] lll�'� R 1 �r� �tl -7- -M AL_ Cie CONCEPTUAL PLANS — FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY JAC CONCEPTUAL PLANS - FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Page 559 of 745 CONCEPTUAL PLANS - FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Page 560 of 745 . ®r- . ....... NPPF-," L-A Now r7 000- 0 f-1 -ommomporm— CONCEPTUAL PLANS -FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Page 564,of 745 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: Eaglecrest Planned Unit Development Rezone Petition Number: PL20250009053 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting (NIM) held by Karim Ismail, representing Proudhouse Builders LLC on: Monday November 24t", 2025 at 6 p.m. at South Regional Collier County Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy, Naples, FL 34113. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The purpose and intent of this neighborhood information meeting is to provide the public with notice of the impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agriculture (A) to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to allow up to 12 residential dwelling units with a maximum density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre (DUA) on 4.04± acres of property located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3 North % and South %, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20250009053] rice ST Project c Location RD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail by December 24t" 2025 to: Karim Ismail Project Manager, Proudhouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd, Ste 205, Cape Coral, FL, 33990 (407)-990-2880 karim@blueprintpal.com Page 565 of 745 Naples Daily News - 11/03/2025 Page : D12 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PETITION: Eaglecrest Planned Unit Development Rezone Petition Number: PL20250009053 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting (NIM) held by Karim Ismail, representing Proudhouse Builders LLC on: Monday November 24", 2025 at 6 p.m. at South Regional Collier County Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy, Naples, FL 34113. The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. The purpose and intent of this neighborhood information meeting is to provide the public with notice of the impending zoning application and to foster communication between the applicant and the public. The expectation is that all attendees will conduct themselves in such a manner that their presence will not interfere with the orderly progress of the meeting. An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agriculture (A) to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to allow up to 12 residential dwelling units with a maximum density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre (DUA) on 4.04± acres of property located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3 North Y and South Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20250009053] Pricy 4, �q Project 4 Location 7nH er .�]Smdrn n NIr Crcrl: AR � }lanyirr Ru WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail to: Karim Ismail Project Manager, Proudhouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd, Ste 205, Cape Coral, FL, 33990 (407)-990-2880 karim@biueprintput.com ND<2952095 November 17, 2025 9:12 am (GMT-5:00) Powered66TWV1,4 745 < ProudHouse B U I L D E R S January 16, 2026 Collier County Planning & Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20250009053 - Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest) Rezone - Submittal 3 Dear Planning & Zoning Staff, On behalf of ProudHouse Builders LLC, we respectfully resubmit this application to rezone the above - referenced parcels from Agricultural (A) to Copperstone Estates Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to allow for the development of 12 residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 3 include the following: 1. Cover Letter with Narrative Statement 2. PUDZ Application (refer to submittal 2 document) 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre -Application Meeting Notes (refer to submittal 1 document) S. Affidavit of Authorization (refer to submittal 2 document) 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form (refer to submittal 1 document) 7. Addressing Checklist (refer to submittal 2 document) 8. Warranty Deed (refer to submittal 1 document) 9. Signed and Sealed Surveys (refer to submittal 2 document) 10. Environmental Survey (refer to submittal 2 document) 11. Traffic Impact Statement 12. Public Facilities Map (refer to submittal 2 document) 13. PUD Exhibits A-F 14. List of Requested Deviations with Justification (refer to submittal 2 document) 15. Response Letter to 1st Sufficiency Review Comments (refer to submittal 2 document) 16. Waiver Application from Required Historical and Archaeological Survey and Assessment (refer to submittal 2 document) 17. Response Letter to 2nd Sufficiency Review Comments 18. Post -Review Correspondence (2nd Review) 19. Resumes for Environmental Consultants 20. School Impact Analysis Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 1 of 3 Page 567 of 745 Narrative Statement Project Description The subject parcels, totaling approximately 4.04 acres, are located in a transitional area where agricultural lands interface with established residential neighborhoods. The property is currently underutilized in its Agricultural designation, and its location within the Urban Residential Subdistrict (URS) of the Collier County Future Land Use Map supports residential development at low to medium densities. The proposed rezoning would allow the creation of a thoughtfully designed community with a maximum total of 12 residential units and accessory uses. The project will include landscaped buffers, internal roadways, and stormwater management systems designed to County and SFWMD standards. Need for the Amendment The requested amendment is necessary to bring the property into alignment with surrounding land uses and to implement the intent of the Growth Management Plan by: 1. Providing Housing Diversity in a High -Demand Market: Collier County continues to experience strong demand for quality single-family housing, particularly in the luxury segment. The 12-home proposal helps address this demand while maintaining compatibility with adjacent properties. 2. Efficient Use of Land and Infrastructure: Water and sewer will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process. Rezoning from Agricultural to RPUD will ensure efficient use of these public services, consistent with GMP policies promoting compact, service -supported growth. 3. Transition Between Land Uses: The project provides an appropriate land use transition between higher - intensity suburban neighborhoods and remaining agricultural lands, reinforcing orderly growth patterns envisioned in the GMP. 4. Environmental Stewardship: Preliminary environmental reviews indicate no jurisdictional wetlands or listed species. The proposed RPUD will preserve significant open space and native vegetation and incorporate sustainable stormwater management, thereby protecting natural resources. Consistency with Collier County's Growth Management Plan The proposed amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Public Facilities Element of the GMP by: - Locating housing where infrastructure is already available; - Expanding housing choice in a constrained, high -demand market; and - Promoting compact development patterns that prevent urban sprawl. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 2 of 3 Page 568 of 745 Conclusion Approval of this rezoning will allow the County to implement its Growth Management Plan policies while meeting local housing demand. The project will deliver a limited, high -quality residential community that enhances the character of the surrounding area, promotes efficient infrastructure use, and protects environmental resources. We respectfully request your review and approval of this application. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Karim Ismail Project Manager ProudHouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Ste 205 Cape Coral, FL 33990-3628 Tel: 407-990-2880 Email: karim@blueprintpal.com Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 3 of 3 Page 569 of 745 Co Ter C014 ty Growth Management Community ❑evelopment Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) ✓ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsections 10.02.13 E; and 10.03.06.13; and Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. File a separate application for an insubstantial or minor change to a PUD. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Abdul Aldan Name of Applicant if different than owner: Karim Address: 1871 16TH ST NE Ismail City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34120 Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Karim Ismail Firm: ProudHouse Builders LLC Address: 923 Del Prado Blvd, Ste 205 city: Cape Coral Telephone:407-990-2880 cell: E-Mail Address: karim@blueprintpal.com If Property is under contract to be sold: Name of Property Buyer(s): Jack Selig - Proudhouse Builders, LLC Name of Applicant if different than buyer: Address: Telephone: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Karim Ismail Firm: Proudhouse Builders, LLC Address: City: City: Cell: Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: State: FL Zip: 33990 State: ZIP: State: ZIP: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 1 of 11 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 www.colliercountyfl.gov Page 570 of 745 RF70NF REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from:Agricultural Zoning district(s) to the Copperstone Estates RPU D Zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property:Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Single -Family Residential Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No: N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • If required to do so at the pre -application meeting, the applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six (6) months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 3 Lot: N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Metes & Bounds Description: N/A Plat Book: N/A Page #: N/A Size of Property: 400 ft. x 440 Property ID Number: 00724880001 & 00724520002 ft. = 176000 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 4.04 Address/General Location of Subject Property: Survey included with Application. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑✓ Residential ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Industrial ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Research and Technology Park ❑ Airport Operations ❑ Other: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 2 of 11 Page 571 of 745 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N PUD (FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT) Multifamily residential S PUD (ARTESIA POINTE) & A Vacant lands and single-family residential E PUD (WINDING CYPRESS) Single-family residential W PUD (FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT), C-4, C-5 Residential accessory uses, commercial If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N/A /N/A /N/A Lot: N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: N/A Plat Book: N/A Page #: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: N/A Property ID Number: N/A ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Home Owner / Civic Association(s) that could be affected by this petition and located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Civic Associations and Communities page on the Board of County Commissioner's website. Applicant is responsible for and shall confirm the current mailing addresses for each association as registered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. Mailing Address: 22581 Island Lakes Dr. City: Estero State: FL ZIP: 33928 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: WINDING CYPRESS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Mailing Address: 6609 WILLOW PARK DRIVE City: NAPLES State: FL Zip: 34109 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: ARTESIA NAPLES MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. Mailing Address: 7400 TAMIAMI TRAIL N SUITE 103City: NAPLES State: FL Zip: 34108 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Mailing Address: 13300 TAM IAMI TRAIL EAST City:NAPLES State: FL Zip:34113 Name of Homeowner / Civic Association: Mailing Address: City: PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 State: ZIP: Page 3 of 11 Page 572 of 745 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy, or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy, or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 4 of 11 Page 573 of 745 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes �✓ No If yes, please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.05. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, F5. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment, or change, for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing, and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees, and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 5 of 11 Page 574 of 745 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Karim Ismail - Proudhouse Builders, LLC Address: 923 Del Prado Blvd S city: Cape Coral State: FL Zip: 33990 Telephone:407-990-2880 Cell: E-Mail Address: karim@blueprintpal.com Address of Subject Property (If available): Property IDs 00724880001 & 00724520002 City: State: Zip: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 15 /")'I /L Lot: n/a Block: n/a Subdivision: n/a Metes & Bounds Description: n/a Plat Book: n/a Page #: n/a Check applicable system: Property ID Number: 00724880001 & 0072452002 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System Type: TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: 30 Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 5460 gpd B. Sewer -Peak: 9.1 gpm Average Daily Demands: 4200 gpd Average Daily Demands: 3000 gpd PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 6 of 11 Page 575 of 745 Potable Water Demand & Sanitary Sewer Flows for Statement of Utility Provisions Estimated Sewage Flows Residential Units 12 Population Per Unit 2.5 Equivalent population 30 Collier County Per Capita Flow (gpdpc) 100 Total Average Daily Flow @ 120,000 SF 3000 GPD 0.83 gpm Peak hour factor derived equation from 10 States Standards (Figure 1) Peak Hour Factor = 18 + V-P 4+V-P 4.4 Peak Hour Flow (Average Daily Flow * PHF) 13064 GPD 9.1 gpm Potable Water Demand Potable Total Average Daily Demand = Sewer Flow * 1.4 4200 GPD 1.2 gpm Peak Hour Flow = Average Daily Flow * 1.3 5460 GPD 1.5 gpm Page 576 of 745 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Attach additional pages if necessary. n/a Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. n/a Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 7 of 11 Page 577 of 745 COVENANT OF CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Abdul Awan 00724880001 & 00724520002 1871 16TH ST NE Naples FL 34120 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for PUD planned unit development ( R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Eaglecrest Luxury Villas LLC , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County of issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit develo ent and the un may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all ter nditions a saf uards of the planned unit development. Signature of Owner Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mebypmeans of 0 physical presence or online notarization this _day of 4 , 20�)by PIP A 0— 1 who is ❑personally known to me or r'71 has produced - 1 as identification. VCE- MARLO GARCIA blic State of otary F,b Signature of NotaryPublic Commit HH351497 Mario Garcia �� ztzsnav Print Name of Notary Public PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 8 of 11 Page 578 of 745 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ® PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary LJ Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deed(s) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures ❑Li Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑ ❑ Statement of utility provisions Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code ❑ ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 9 of 11 Page 579 of 745 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑ ❑ Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Li Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification ❑ ❑ +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: • Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit B: Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each • Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2)(b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS— INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts Parks and Recreation Director: ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Stormwater Management: ❑ Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) ® Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ® PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ® Transportation Review Fees: • Methodology Review: $500.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting • Minor Study Review: $750.00 • Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 10 of 11 Page 580 of 745 �\ Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) Estimated legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $1,125.00 • BCC: 5500.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) 7-7 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: • Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District incoordination with the County Ali fees a-e collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/opplicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submitta package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. 'Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Public Portal: https:Hcvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov Signature of Petitioner or Agent o'6 t� .1.`f�C1Cx� Printed Named of Signing Party oc Date PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (P'U.DZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 Page 581 of 745 < ProudHouse B U I L D E R S Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 Evaluation Criteria Narrative Statement Project Description The subject parcels, totaling approximately 4.04 acres, are located in a transitional area where agricultural lands interface with established residential neighborhoods. The property is currently underutilized in its Agricultural designation, and its location within the Urban Residential Subdistrict (URS) of the Collier County Future Land Use Map supports residential development at low to medium densities. The proposed rezoning would allow the creation of a thoughtfully designed community with a maximum total of 12 residential units and accessory uses. The project will include landscaped buffers, internal roadways, and stormwater management systems designed to County and SFWMD standards. Need for the Amendment The requested amendment is necessary to bring the property into alignment with surrounding land uses and to implement the intent of the Growth Management Plan by: 1. Providing Housing Diversity in a High -Demand Market: Collier County continues to experience strong demand for quality single-family housing, particularly in the luxury segment. The 12-home proposal helps address this demand while maintaining compatibility with adjacent properties. 2. Efficient Use of Land and Infrastructure: Water and sewer will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process. Rezoning from Agricultural to RPUD will ensure efficient use of these public services, consistent with GMP policies promoting compact, service -supported growth. 3. Transition Between Land Uses: The project provides an appropriate land use transition between higher -intensity suburban neighborhoods and remaining agricultural lands, reinforcing orderly growth patterns envisioned in the GMP. 4. Environmental Stewardship: Preliminary environmental reviews indicate no jurisdictional wetlands or listed species. The proposed RPUD will preserve significant open space and native vegetation and incorporate sustainable stormwater management, thereby protecting natural resources. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 1 of 7 Page 582 of 745 PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject property is a suitable location for the proposed residential land uses. The site is located favorably with respect to the surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance ofsuch areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant is under contract to purchase all land within the proposed Copperstone Estates RPUD. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) Future Land Use Element The subject property is designated Urban Residential (UR) Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map, and within the US41 East Overlay. This designation allows for residential development at a density of up to three (3) units per acre, provided the site meets all applicable standards. The proposed rezoning from Agricultural to Residential is consistent with this designation as it will provide low density housing, complementing the surrounding development patterns. The proposed community will be designed in compliance with FLUE Goals, Objectives, and Policies, including: • Goal 1: Support well -planned growth by directing new residential uses to areas served by infrastructure. • Objective 1.1: Ensure new development occurs in areas where public facilities and services are available. • Policy 1.1.2: Promote compact growth patterns that efficiently use land and infrastructure. The proposed Copperstone Estates RPUD is consistent with the goals of preventing urban sprawl and ensuring compatible, efficient land use as outlined in the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5.5 (Discourage Urban Sprawl): The project directly supports this policy by proposing development on a property located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, not an expansion of it. As an infill project, it promotes a compact growth pattern by Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 2 of 7 Page 583 of 745 utilizing land already served by existing public infrastructure, thereby minimizing the public cost of extending community facilities and services. Policy 5.6 (Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses): The proposed low -density residential use, at 3 dwelling units per acre, is compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land use pattern, which consists of established residential communities and PUDs. The project serves as a logical transition between nearby developments and will incorporate landscaped buffers to ensure a harmonious integration with adjacent properties. Policy 5.7 (Encourage Use of Urban Land): This project exemplifies the intent of this policy by redeveloping an underutilized infill parcel that is already designated for urban intensity uses on the Future Land Use Map. This approach efficiently uses land within the existing urban boundary, fully aligning with the County's goal to prioritize development in these areas before designating new ones. The project's design has been thoughtfully considered to align with the County's policies for traffic management and interconnectivity. Policy 7.1 (Connection to Collector/Arterial Roads): The site plan provides for safe and efficient access to the adjacent collector roadway. This direct connection ensures that residents can easily access the broader transportation network, consistent with the County's access management goals. Policy 7.2 (Internal Access): The internal roadway is designed to manage vehicle circulation effectively within the development. Connection to US 41 will be designed to meet FDOT standards, which supports the policy's goal of reducing congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads. Policy 7.3 (Interconnection): The potential for interconnectivity with adjoining properties was evaluated during the design process. Due to the existing development patterns and lack of available stub streets on adjacent parcels, a direct street interconnection is not considered feasible. Transportation Element / Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.3 of the Transportation Element and Policy 1.5. Subsections A-B of the Capital Improvement Element establish the level of service standards for arterial and collector roads. The Traffic Impact Statement prepared in support of the PUD rezone concludes that there are no level of service deficiencies anticipated as a result of the project. The development will also contribute mitigation where applicable, ensuring compliance with Transportation Element policies. Potable Water Sub -Element Policy 3.1 and 3.2 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 1.5 Subsection D in the Capital Improvement Element provide the level of service standard for which developments must demonstrate adequate capacity exits at the time of SDP approval. Potable water will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 3 of 7 Page 584 of 745 Wastewater Treatment Sub -Element Policy 2.1 of the Wastewater Treatment Sub -Element and Policy 1.5 Subsection E in the Capital Improvement Element establishes the level of service standard for wastewater treatment. Wastewater will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process. Stormwater Management Sub -Element Stormwater management will comply with SFWMD and Collier County standards, ensuring no adverse impacts to adjacent properties. Solid Waste Sub -Element Collier County Solid Waste facilities have sufficient capacity to serve the project. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCMEI The property has been evaluated for environmental resources, including jurisdictional wetlands and listed species on the site. The minimum open space requirement will be preserved, including native vegetation retention areas, consistent with GMP conservation policies. Stormwater treatment systems will be incorporated to maintain water quality. The Copperstone Estates RPUD is consistent with Collier County's CCME Policy 6.1.1 (Native Vegetation Preservation). The project is a residential development of 4.04 acres in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). According to the CCME Policy 6.1.1 table, projects equal to or greater than 2.5 acres in the CHHA must preserve a minimum of 25% of the existing native vegetation. The project will meet or exceed this 25% retention standard. Native vegetation is defined as a vegetative community having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. The preserved area will be the largest contiguous area possible for wildlife habitat and will be permanently protected by a conservation mechanism to prohibit further development. Objective 7.1 requires directing incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. A wildlife survey was conducted, and no protected species or signs thereof were observed on the site. Since no listed species were observed utilizing the site, the project is consistent with the objective. The project will comply with applicable federal and state permitting requirements for listed species protection. If any listed species are discovered during development, a habitat management plan will be submitted and implemented per Policy 7.1.2. Intergovernmental Coordination Element The rezoning and proposed development will be coordinated with relevant state and regional agencies, including FDOT and SFWMD, to ensure consistency with regional infrastructure and growth planning. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 4 of 7 Page 585 of 745 d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The conceptual PUD Master Plan identifies buffers, which will meet buffer requirements per the LDC. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas inexistence and as proposed to serve the development. The Copperstone Estates RPUD Master Plan identifies open space, which meets or exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) requirements for open space for residential development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. No deficiencies have been identified. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Expansion of the RPUD boundary is not anticipated. All contiguous properties under control of the applicant are included in the PUD. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The RPUD rezone proposes residential land uses and meets criteria for PUD rezonings as outlined in the LDC. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the current Future Land Use Map. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is surrounded by vacant lands zoned agricultural, various planned units developments (Falling Waters Beach Resort, Winding Cypress, Artesia Pointe, Naples Motorcoach Resort, Tamiami Crossing), and commercial subdistricts. The predominant land use pattern in the area is residential. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 5 of 7 Page 586 of 745 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Rezoning the property to a PUD does not create an isolated district. The property is of sufficient size to meet the criteria for a PUD rezoning. The PUD rezoning is logical as the property will be developed to allow residential uses similar to the surrounding communities and development standards need to be identified. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing Agricultural zoning does not permit the residential uses proposed to be developed on the property. The rezoning is required in order to develop the proposed residential uses. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan amendment. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The addition of residential units will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. Adequate buffering is proposed for the project. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The traffic analysis prepared in support of the RPUD rezone demonstrates that no significant impacts are created by the project. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. All proposed improvements will be reviewed by the SFWMD as part of an environmental resource permit, which includes a review of the surface water management system to ensure compliance with approved discharge rates for this drainage basin. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The changes will have no impact to light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change should have no impact on property values on adjacent property. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 6 of 7 Page 587 of 745 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed addition of residential land uses at this location will not be a detriment to improvement or development of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute agrant ofspecial privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. All property owners have the right to propose changes that are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. No special privileges are granted by this change. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning does not permit the proposed residential land uses on the Agricultural zoned parcel; therefore, a RPUD rezone is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The densities requested are similar to the surrounding residential communities. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in Collier County for this RPUD; however, this part of Collier County is characterized by high demand for residential land uses. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. There are no unique features of the property. Development will require site clearing and filling. Open space and preservation will be provided as required under the Growth Management Plan and LDC. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are no deficiencies anticipated with development of this use. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The RPUD contains development standards and commitments, which will ensure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 7 of 7 Page 588 of 745 ,t, Collier County GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Rezone to RPUD (PUDZ ) Date and TIme:Wednesday 8/27/25 at 3: 00 ZOOM Property information Assigned Planner: Nancy Gundlach Project Name: Eaglecrest Rezone {PUD2j PL#: 20250009053 00724880001 & 007245 0002 Agri cultural (Aj Property ID/Folio: urrent Zoning: Project Address: US 41E City:Naples , State:FL Zipa4114 Applicant: Abdoul Awan — Patriot Engineering Co. Agent Name. Abdul Awan Phone: 239-308-0099 Agent/Firm Address: 780 5th Ave S Ste200 City: Naples State: FL Property Owner: Abdoul Awan Zip: 34102 Please provide the following information, as applicable: i. Total Acreage: 4 .04 r rj 1 �• 6 L �- FR i►e r L+ f 14 $1, rg ii. Proposed number of Residential Units: u/ Y e&a a *"&45 iii. Proposed number of Affordable Housing Units: iv. Proposed Commercial Square Footage. V. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: vi. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vii. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR# or PL#: viii. Is the project within an Area of Historical/Archaeological Probability? Pre -Application Meeting (Votes 7/24/2025 Page 1 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239-252-2400 • www.colliercoun!A.gov/ Page 589 of 745 Collier County Meeting Notes t* �4T7,4cA,-0 evkA14 ,4,,cJ tivec,2S a �v +4 G � � i�. ( � p� � • a. ( "",57 pio s,Tr- rlo.,,, fit. �t Q ems. 4/74C_*P e 0 /iJd 1 ,- 5 o w ?.+C. p9 la Required: The most current Application Form and the Property Ownership Disclosure Form are required for your submittal. All application forms and supplemental forms can be found on the following webpage: htt s:/lwwwlcolliercoun ovl ovemmen! rowth-many ement/divisiQnsl lannin -and- zonin - divisionlland-use-a lications#!J Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicants during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictate the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided with the required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 7/24/2025 Page 2 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North 11orse Aoe Drive • Napies, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • w%N %v. col I icrcou nt y fi.,*vv Page 590 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Parker Klopf Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2025 3:48 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: PL20250009053 Eaglecrest pre app notes Attachments: PL20250009fl53 Eaglecrest pre app notes.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Parker Klopf Planner III Zoning office:239-252-2471 2800 N Horseshoe ❑r. NAPL.ES, FL 34104 Parker. Klopf(a)colIiercountyfl.gov it Collier County OMMOM Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or In writing. 1'4 Page 591 of 745 PL20250009053 Eaglecrest (PUDZ) Camp Planning Pre app notes: According to the Future Land Use Map the subject property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The subject property is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The County considers the Coastal High Hazard Area (CH HA) as a geographical area lying below the elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 2011 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study. Density within this FLUE designation and with the applicable CHHA is limited to 3 dwelling units and acre unless certain criteria of the density rating system can be met. The applicant has proposed a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the subject 4-acre property, typically PUDs are limited to 10 acres in size unless they are considered to be in#ill development for which the project does qualify for. Density on the site was proposed at 3 DUIa which is considered consistent with the density rating system and thus does not require a growth management plan amendment. As part of your narrative upon submittal please also address the following policies of the Future Land Use Element and any other applicable policies:5.5-5.7,7.1-7.3 Page 592 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Michael Sawyer Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:34 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN; Nancy Gundlach Subject: Eaglecrest PUD2 Pre-App notes Thomas, Please provide the following to the applicant: Transportation Planning: A methodology meeting by email is required, and a note ❑n the TIS cover sheet stating that the fee will be collected at the time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip Iimit/cap Commitment based on TI5 using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Also, provide potential interconnections northwest and southeast, and discuss this requirement with FDOT. Confirm meeting with FDOT regarding access ROW permitting, turn -lane, and stormwater crossing requirements for your proposed access. Michael Sawyer Project Manager II Transportation Engineering Office: 239-252-2926 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 M chaeI.Sawyer(a),colIiercountyfl.gov je_ Collier County 0@00M Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. ? G'e -:23. Page 593 of 745 Collier Counter Meeting Notes (Continued) tzeA ILto V/ Traa,+ ruG - ► �e_ 7.er�rw 7To-a-liee-m,4,r. a� • F6eS 3 A [ a 4- go'e S-e-u .4 77i%-a h e i Sm,.ZM r 1,u& ►9,mzl /.Loc'97i t>AJ 77749.#X 1v eb51 4 e t'on. a a o ,i e_,t!] m S - — ati 1-4 G "P Lys Note 1: If the site is located within the City of Naples Water Service Area, the petition must be submitted to the City of Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. When submitting the petition, please email it to the contacts listed below accompanied by a request to provide a letter of no objection to the petition. Bob Middleton: RMiddleton(a)naplesgov.com Erica Martin: EMartin(cr�.�naolesgov.com Michelle Baines: MBaines(@naplesgov.cam Note 2: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to the issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 7/24/2025 Page 3 of 5 Growth Managrmcnt Community DievCIapntent • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe DHve • Naples, FL 34t04 • 239-252-2400 • •xu m .coiIirrcoiuu; ILA^n i Page 594 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Laurie Beard Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:21 PM To; ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20250009053 Eaglecrest (PUDZ) Attachments: PUD monitoring pre app handout 2025.docx PUD Monitoring pre-app notes attached. Laurie Beard Project Manager 11 Development Review Office:239-252-5782 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Laurie. Beardacolliercountyflgo Collier County Offloom Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 595 of 745 PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: In the Commitments Section of the PUD document, for each department that has a commitment, Iabel the Section the commitment falls under. Oe, Public Utilities, Environmental, Landscaping, Transportation, etc.) Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDPISDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. Alter such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." MisceIIaneous Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Pt 6 --e 3 A- ��, - Page 596 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: David Roe Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:22 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: Nancy Gundlach Subject: Pre -Application Meeting PL20250009053 Eagiecrest (PUDZ) Attachments: Pre -Application Meeting PL20250009053 Eagiecrest (PUDZ)-NOTE5.doc Good afternoon, Please see pre-app notes attached. 2500$ fee required. David Roe Supervisor - Environmental Development Review Office: 239-252-2915 2800 N Horseshoe Naples, FL 34104 David. RoeCo).co I I iercountyfl . gov --s" Collier County Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ?It 16 � 3,61. Page 597 of 745 Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) Project Name: Pr&-Apolication Meeting PL20250009053 Ea lecrest PUDZ 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2,03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents ##24). 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H. I }. 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off site. Exclude vegetation Iocated within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.071; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 Coastal High Hazard, 5 acres, 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.I b. 5. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) 7. Principle structures shall be Iocated a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wail or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Page 598 of 745 Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12, PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site, (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example; A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. Additional Comments: 3. Page 599 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Claudia Carmenate Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2025 4:19 PM To: ThomasCiarkeVEN Subject: RE: Utilities Website iitt 5: WWW.Colli�rCOUnt fI EOv DVernment ul]!iC-utilities Water-Sealer-C�iStrltt en Ineerin -and- ro"eCt- rr�ana ement resources Claudia Carmenate Project Manager I Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Offce:239-252-1335 Col l ier Count) 3339 Tarrtiami Trail, East 131080M Naples. FL 34112 Claudia. Carmenate!2colliercountyfl.pav From: ThomasCiarkeVEN Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4.1.8 PM To: Claudia Carmenate rClaudia.Carmenate@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Utilities Website Hi Claudia, Could you send me that link to that Utilities website and the form you mention during the Zoning Pre-App meetings so when you mention it in the Zoom meeting I can send it to the applicant if applicable. Thank You, 7G.�c �la:Lc Operations Analyst - Zoning division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 Thomas Clarke Operations Analyst Development Review Office:239-252-2526 1!5 Collier CountN a Page 600 of 745 Collier County Zoning Pre -Application Meeting Attendance Sheet PL# Collier County Staff Contact Information Name: Title, See ion/Division: Phone: Email: ❑ Jaime Cook Division Director, Development Review 252-6290 Jaime. CookCc_r�.,coiliercountff qov ❑ Mike Bosi, AICP Division Director, Planning & Zoning 252-1061 Michael. Bosi(ftolliercountOxioy ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. DMsion Director, Impact Fees, Capital Project Planning, Program Management 252-8279 Matt.McLean 9—ov a ❑ Cormac Giblin, AICP Division Director, Economic Dev. & Housing 252-2460 Cormac.Giblln coll iercountO.qov ❑ Ray Bellows Planning Manager, Zoning Services 252-2463 Raymond. Bellows@colliercountVfl.00v ❑ John Kelly Planner lil, Zoning Services 252-5719 John. Kelly(a)colIier_count)L.2ov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Planner III, Zoning Services 252-4312 Tim_othy.FinnCcDcolliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP Planner III, Zoning Services 252-2484 Nanc .Gundlach colliercoun ov L�rMaria Estrada Planner Il, Zoning Services 252-2408 MaHa.Estrada(a).coffiercounto.cLov ❑ Laura DeJohn, AICP Planner II, Zoning Services 252-5587 Laura. DeJohn r(�7- colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Management Analyst I, Zoning Services 252-2526 Thomas .Clarke colliercou nbcLgov ❑ Lisa Blacklidge Planning Manager, Development Review 252-2758 Lisa.Blacklidge(a),colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Reviewer, Development Review 252-8523 Peter.Shawinsky(o),Wlliercountyn.qov ❑ Christine Willoughby Planner III, Development Review 252-5748 Christine.Willoughby(@colliercountN .goy ❑ Mark Templeton Planner III, Development Review 252-2475 Mark.Temoleton@colliercountyfl gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Planner II, Development Review 252-2313 Stefanie. Nawrockicolliercoun ov ❑ Sara Ison Planner II, Development Review 252-2574 Sara. lsonCcDcoiliercountyfl.no_v ❑ Diana Compagnone Planner I, Development Review 252-2429 Diana.Compagnone(o)cclliercountvfl.gov ❑ Jennifer Breining Planner I, Development Review 252-5573 Jennifer. Breining@colliercountvfl.Qoy ❑ Eric Johnson, AICP Planning Manager, Land Development Code 252-2931 Eric.Johnson(d)colliercountyll.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Planner III, Land Development Code 252-2464 Richard. Hendedongacolliercountyfi.4Dy ❑ Angela Galiano Planner 11, Land Development Code 252-5759 An ela.Galiano colliercoun . ov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning 252-27081 James.SaboC¢7collierccuntA-goy e.' Parker Klopf Planner Ili, Comprehensive Planning 252-2471 Parker.Kiopf(6colliercounto,,gov Austin Grubb Planner 111, Comprehensive Planning 252-2834 Austin.Grubb@colliercount±.gov ❑ Kathryn Grigsby Planner Ill, Comprehensive Planning 252-2971 Kathryn.Grigsbcolliercountyfl.ciov ❑ Jessica Constantnescu Planner II, Comprehensive Planning 252-4329 Jessica.Constantinescu colliercount ov 5tephenne Barter Planner II, Comprehensive Planning 252-7707 Ste henne.Barter colliercoun ov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Planner III, Community Planning & Resiliency 252-2834 Michele.Mosca@colliercountA.gov Q Laurie Beard Project Manager II, PUD Monitoring 252-5782 Laurie, Beard(c-7colliercoun av ❑ Sarah Harrington Planning Manager, Economic Dev. & Housing 252-4211 Sarah .Harhn ton colliercoun ov ❑ Lorraine Lantz Manager, Transportation Planning 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz()-colIiercountyfl.paV Michael Sawyer Project Manager II, Transportation Planning 252-2926 Michaei-Sawvercolliercountyf.ggv ❑ Kathy Eastley, AICP Planner lil, Transportation Planning 252-2361 Katherine. Eastleyl§colliercountyFl.Oav ❑ Gino Santabarbara Manager, Impact Fees 252-2 225 Gino. Santabarbaracolliercoun ov Pre -Application Meeting Notes 7/24/2025 Page 4 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34-104 •239-252-2400 • _ Page 601 of 745 Collier County J ❑ Anthony Stolts Supervisor - Project Management, Utilities 252-5835 Ant hony-Stolts@coIIiercountvflxiov Er Claudia Carmenate Project Manager I, Utilities 252-2917 Claudia.Carmenate&colliercountyfi.gov ❑ Jocelyn Nageon de LeStang Supervisor— Project Management, Engineering 252-2434 J-Na eondeLestan colliercount . ov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Manager, Engineering 252-2911 Jack, McKenna coiliercoun tyf . wv ❑ John Houldsworth Sr. Site Plans Reviewer, Engineering 252-5757 John. H_ouldsworth(cbcolliercountvFl.aoy ❑ Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer, Engineering 252-2326 Alicia. Humphries c_colliercountyfl.00v Craig Brown Manager, Environmental Review 252-2548 Craig.Brown&colliercounM.gay David Roe Supervisor, Environmental Review 252-2915 David. Roe aC).colliercounbL-_c. ov ❑ Alexandra Mitchel Environmental Specialist, Environmental Review 252-2907 Al ex andra.M1tchel a),coiiiercountyfl.gov ❑ Lauren Murray Environmental Specialist, Environmental Review 252-2306 Lauren.Murrav(a)colIiercountyfl.gov Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 252-8773 Heidi.Ashton colliercoun ov ❑ Courtney DaSilva Assistant County Attorney 252-8471 Courtne DaSiIva(&,coIIiercountO.qoy ❑ Diane Lynch Management Analyst II, Ops & Reg Management 252-4283 Diane.Lynch(&colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Renald Paul Management Analyst I, Ops & Reg Management 252-2443 Renaid-Paul cCi7, colliercounto.-go ❑ Connie Thomas Client Services Supervisor 252-6369 Consuela.ThomasC&colliercountvfl.goy ❑ Jennifer Gonzalez Program Coordinator, Client Services 252-1036 Jennifer.GonzalezaC, colliercountyfl.goy ❑ Maria Martinez Program Coordinator, Client Services 252-1036 Maria.Martinez colliercoun . ov Richard Vazquez Program Coordinator, Client Services 252-1036 _Richard Vazguez(@co€IiercountN f.gov ❑ Isabela Fajardo Program Coordinator, Client Services 252-1036 Isabela.Fajardo6c)colliercountO.gov ❑ Sean Lintz Asst. Chief of Life Safety, North Collier Fire 597-9227 SLintz(d�northcollierfire.com ❑ Daniel Turner Plans Reviewer 1, North Collier Fire 252-2521 Daniel.Tume[@colliercountyfi.gov ❑ Linda Naples Sr. Fire Plan Examiner, North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Naples aC, colIiercountyfl.-qov ❑ Shar A. Beddow Captain, Greater Naples Fire 687-5950 Shar.Beddow(Mcollierg2unW.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Site Plans Reviewer III, Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 Thomas.Mastroberto(aDcolliercountvfl.pov Additional Attendee Contact Information Name: Representing: Phone: Email: t-'An o-r 'Frtl 6 , S e Y 1471&617It D -Zap• .¢ �t ►v -c Pre -Application Meeting Notes 7/24/2025 Page 5 of 5 Growth Management Community Development • Planning & Zoning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 •239.252-2400 • u n w.enliicreuuntslLvcn I Page 602 of 745 Pre-App Zoom Attendance: Meeting Date: Wednesday 8/27/25 at 1.30 ZOOM as lecrest_Rezone (PUDZ) — PL202500p9053 _ Plan-ner_Nancy.Gundla-ch ® mla rt c :] a!tt< . i Q Find a participant Cthomas clarke (Me) X 0 aNancyGundlach © 0 Ij Justin Ebrite A, VA Karim Ismail 0 CDJ Parker Kiopf 0 I, sawyerniichae# 0 0� ashton_h Oj Austin Grubb 0 CD3 CBeard_I 0 Bill Tredik ./ 0 ClaudiaCarmenate X.� CDI David Roe AZY 0 estradamaria O� Fireflies.ai Notetaker Admin •' 0 Ismael Quintero x Richard Vazquez aStephen ne.Barter .V Page 603 of 745 Cn'[p'. G911114saT�y Growth Management Community Development Dept. ZONING STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING Meeting Date: Wednesday 8 27 25 at 3:00 ZOOM Zoning Operations Staff: Thomas Clarke Ea lecrest Rezone PUDZ - PL20250009053 Planner: Nancy Gundlach • Applicant Submitting Request: Abdoul Awan — Patriot Engineering Co. 239-308-0099 admin@patriotengco.com • Agent to list for PL# Justin Ebrite — Patriot Engineering Company 239-308-0099 x101 Ebrite PatriotEn Co.com • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Abdoul Awan — Both Parcels Parcel # 00724880001 & Parcel # 00724520002 - US 41E, Naples FL.34114 ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: PUD Rezone (PUDZ) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): TBD —See Below • Details about Project: See options below: See attached Narrative Statement and Conceptual Master Plan. Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Connie Thomas- Supervisor — Permitting Consuela.thomas@colliercountyFl.igoy - Phone: 239-252-2473 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:NCDES Planning Services\Current\2oning Staff Information Page 604 of 745 ThomasClarkeVEN From: Justin Ebrite <JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2025 5:49 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: Nancy Gundlach; Ray Bellows; James Sabo Subject: Re: Zoning Pre-App Zoom meeting for Eaglecrest(PUDZ) - PL20250009053 Attachments: PUD-EXHIBIT C-1 MASTER PLAN.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL. This emait is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking (inks. Hi Thomas, i -X) wGL�.n Hope all is well. The client has settled on a single plan for, Wsingle-family residences with large shop garages. Patriot Engineering will not be serving as the primary contact; instead, we'll be providing support with plans and enginee ringtasks as needed. I've added the client contact to the portal, as he will act as the lead moving forward. i assisted them with preparing the attached Master Plan, which should be close to what is ultimately submitted. As a heads -up, they are targeting submission by the end of this week for funding purposes. Because of the tight timeline, several items are either already completed or still being finalized. We'll likely need to request deferment to the 2nd submittal for certain requirements —such as the environmental study (if applicable) -- since they are stilt in process. I also assume your pre-app notes may not be available before the submission date. Best regards, EBR* 37157 Justin Ebrite President 1 Project Manager Patriot Engineering Company Veteran Owned and Operated SBA Certified SDVOSB 1 VOSB Cell: 239-248-7300 Phone: 239-308-0099 EXT 101 Fax: 239-30"750 Email: ,]Ebrite PatriotEn Co.com 780 5'h Ave S. I Suite# 200 Naples, FL 34102 www.PatriotEngineerinciComoanv.com (D � 8 `:J Book a Meeting Patriot Engineering Company would love your feedback! Review Here Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, an AT&T 5G smartphono Get Outlook for Android Page 605 of 745 NATIVE PRESERVE CALCULATION NO PRESERVATION REQUIRED SITE UNDER 5 AC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION 30% OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 0.30 X 4.04AC = 1.21 AC REQUIRED 1.21 MIN. PROVIDED kU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT {UR) v�' • / ZONING:C4 USE: COMMERICAL �0 aRl- �Q O� =Lu' J�3kV R:SI]=h`:4_ R�L� 5U3OIST�IJT ;!;R. ZO.VIN-;• RJ] USE RE- SI]eVTAL LAND USE SUMMARY ITEM I AREA (SF) I AREA (AC) I TOTAL SITE TOTAL SITE AREA 1 176,000 SF 1 4.04 AC 1 100.00% LANDSCAPE BUFFERS I 28,400SF 1 0.65 AC 1 16.14% 1 OPEN I DRAINACE GE E & 52,800SF I 1.21 AC I 30.00% REMAINING RESIDENTIAL I 94,800SF f 2.18 AC 1 53,86% 1 NOTES: 1, THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE THROUGH LOCAL AND STATE PERMITTING AT TIME OF SDP. 15,0' TYPE "B" BUFFER FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT (UR) ZONING: A I uS&VACANT 25.0' SETBACK I� fps 117 INGRESS/EGRESS 1� FLU; URBAN COASTAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT (UC) 25.0' TYPE "D" BUFFER - ZONING A USE. -VACANT 30.0' SETBACK — ono FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL \_ SUBDISTRICT (UR) A� /ZONING: A- USE:VACANT o � FLU' URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT (UR) ZONING: PUD - USE: RESIDENTIAL 15.0' TYPE "B" BUFFER /-25.0' SETBACK 15.0' TYPE "B" BUFFER 25.0' SETBACK FLU: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT (LfR) ZONING: A USE:VACANT RETENTION (TYP.) , i FLU:.URBAN RI=SIDENT?AL FRINGE SUBD1STRiC7 (OR6 ZONING: PVb USE: RESIDENTIAL . 1 't FLU. URBAN COASTAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT (UC) ZONING; CPUp USE—G.' CPT FLU; URBAN COASTAL FRINGE SUBDISTRICT (UC) ZONING: CPUD USE:MOBILE HQME: PARKS o LEGEND: �aa aoa aoo WATER MANAGEMENT R RESIDENTIAL AREA 0 BUFFER 4-► INGRESS/EGRESS GRAPH IC SCALE 1"=200 FT PROJECT: EAGLECREST RPUD TITLE: SHEET #: EXHIBIT C-1 ENGINEERING COMPANY F80 3[h Ay[ S I Su1-E 200 RP NLES. �LCRJDA U102 PHONE. J39j 39$-Wp 9I PAX! (239) 3083750 PATRI DT Y'rVuW.PAiF{OTENGINEEPoNGCOMPANY.CON FL E BFW 37157 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G.2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code The following submittal requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please upload the submittal items with cover sheets attached to each section via the GMCD Portal. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted, or processed. View sample PUD document. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized P roperty Own e rs h i p Disclosure Form Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control Completed Addressing Checklist (no older than 6 months) Warranty Deeds) Signed and sealed Boundary Survey (no older than 6 months) Architectural rendering of proposed structures Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. ❑ [] Statement of utility provisions LJ Statement of compliance with Growth Management Plan Environmental data requirements pursuant to LDC section 3,08.00 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. See Chapter 7 A. of the Administrative Code [ ❑ Listed or protected species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TiS) Historical and Archaeological Survey or Waiver Er o School impact Analysis Application, if applicable with residential uses Location of existing public facilities that will serve the PUD Electronic copy of all required documents Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC With justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) rl - ❑ Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and one (1) 8 „ x iit copy ❑ *Checklist continues on next page PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PUDR) 4122124 Page 9 of 11 Page 607 of 745 Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending the PUD ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Development Commitments (infrastructure and related matters) Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document nd attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses • Exhibit 13; Development Standards Table for each type of land use • Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code • Exhibit D: Legal Description • Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ■ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areos, pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08 A.2.a.(2){b)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart © Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Anthony Stolts FK Parks and Recreation Director: Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Stormwater Management: Fire: City of Naples Planning Director: Erica Martin Other: City ofNaplesUtilities: ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS ® Fire Pre -Application Meeting: $150.00 (Applied as credit towards fire review fee upon submittal of application if within 9 months of the pre-app meeting date) L!J Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,ODO.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ® Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 R Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: ■ Methodology Review: $SOO.00 (Methodology by Email to Staff) *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting ■ Minor Study Review: $750.00 ■ Major Study Review $1,500.00 PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA, PURR) 4122124 Page 10 of 11 Page 608 of 745 Fire Planning Review Fee: ($300 PUDZ, PUDR) ($150 PUDA) Estimated Legal Advertising fee: • CCPC: $ OO1so• o c� ■ BCC: $500.00 If applicable, an additional fee for Property Owner Notifications will be billed to the applicant after Hearing Examiner hearing date. (Variable) ElSchool Concurrency Fee, if applicable: Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District incoordination with the County All fees are collected at the time of application. Property Notification Letters, if required by The Land Development Code, will be invoiced after the petition is heard by the Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, 1 attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. i understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMC❑ Public Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov {-(- , 1;r ce rf, 0, a 'I u.01 11 � Signature of Petitioner or Agen Date Printed Named of 5i ing Party PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment, PUD to PUD Rezone Application (PUDZ, PUDA. PUDR) 4/22/24 Page 11 of 11 Page 609 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PErrrloN NUMBERS($) (print name), as "*aw'w (tilts, ii applicable) of ern(company, if a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that i ant the (Cheose Mile) owner applicant ntrsrt purchasand that 1 1 have full authority to secure the app„ov8l(5) requested and to impose covenants ana resUsAitnto in. the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County In accordance with this application and the Land Development Cade: 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any are honest sketches, d true; other supp%mentar�y rnatter attached hereto and made a part Of this applr 3 I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4 The property will be transferred, Conveyed, sold or sUbdivrdeo SUOPW +A restriction imposed by tha approved action. 5 We/1 suttwrixe � *a uc ,s.,, ,d..>L owe. to act as ourirny representative in any matters tegaming tftis petition including 1 through 2 above. Notes. • if the applicant is a corporation. Glen it is usuaity executed by the corp. Ares. or v. Pms. • If [tile aWiicara is a L imlted t.iabdify Company (L..L..C.) or L.oWed Company ft_.CJ) luw the documents should 4piwily ba signed by the Company's "Managing Mom bar." . if the applicant is a partnefship, Phan typically a partner can sign on hehaff of the partnership. • tf the applicant is a trmr7ed partnership, then the general partner must sign and be fdentiffed as the 'general pa:irfar of the named partnership. tT fha applit *M is a trust, then May must include the trustee's name afKd fhe words 'as trustee °- • Jr each instanoe, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., irttfrvrdual, corporate, trust, partnership, and rites use the appropriate (ormaf for that 4ownership. Finder pan 109, 1 declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authortimfion and that the face jai true. Signature • Datte or STATE FLORIDA CO(J OF COLLIER for m i ri was abefore me c%4aged befome by mans of I presence or E] vrome nouNuatkpnhia S dgy f , 20)� by (prirttad name of owner or qualifier; sw-t pw&w4r,) Notary PulAc must dw* applicable both © Are pwsonaltj known So ffw piodoced s s ffmrit 11(invere license Hrxr produced sa. We �I +� Irff 1\1idft&'&i 4e P. Rom -an MY 3ftf" 'r ComTiss�crlate ti _ AA Corrrr.:x:trEs Page 610 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) y SE.fr (print name), as t � n S ittB, if applicable} of cam any, tf a Pica le), swear or affirm under oath, tart I am the (choose one) owner applicant[ �Qntract purchaserand that., t , I have full authorlty to secure the approval(s) requested and to Impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced properly as a result of any action approved by the County ir1 amordanre with thys application and the Land Development Coda; 2_ All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize S17'tQl to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes • If the applicant is a corporation, then: it is usually executed by the core. Ares. or v. pres. ■ if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L-C_), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • !f the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. ■ !f the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner rr►ust sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee". . In each instance, first determine the applicants status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then- lt�e appropriate format for that owr+ershw. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts state77; true•. atu � Doke STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF-9014:1--iR— LCP— The�foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by rneans of Elphysical presence or online notarization this day of - 20a, by (printed name of owner or quarifier) Jcv Such Person(s) Notary Public must check applicable boxy 0 Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license WHas produced Notary cI`48- )A-06lt5EV 1i55 R3!kl:o2o Yap gtIIABETII ntary Sa:�'. ion.` Notary Public . State of Florida Commission # HH 308662 My Comm. Expires Oct 7, 2026 Page 611 of 745 CO*IeY Count y 'RnPFRTY OWNERSHIP DISri nSURE FnRm This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: I IS Name and Address % of Ownership Abdul Awan 100 1 1871 16TH ST NE Naples FL 34120 1 1 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 612 of 745 CO*ier Count y d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Proudhouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Suite 205 Cape Coral FL 33990 Jack Selig Jr 50 Guido Leiendecker 50 Date of Contract: 5/29/25 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of , or trust: Name and Address Eaglecrest Luxury Villas, LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Suite 205 Cape Coral FL 33990 1 g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Samuel Hayes Jamell Jr. years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 613 of 745 Coder Count y Date of option: NA Date option terminates: NA , or After Rezone Completion Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov 9��4_�5 8/10/25 Agent/Owner Sig ture Date Jack M Selig Jr. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Page 614 of 745 ,f Collier County Addressing Checklist GMCD Public Portal Land Development Code Administrative Code Please complete the following and upload via the CityView Portal with your submittal. Items marked with a * are required for every application, other items are optional and may not apply to every project. Forms are valid for 6 months following their submittal; an updated form will be required for a new submittal after that timeframe and any time the properties within the project boundary are modified. Applicant Contact Information *Name of owner/Agent: Karim Ismail, Project Manager Firm [if agent]: ProudHouse Builders LLC *Address: *Telephone: *E-Mail Address: *City: Cell: Location Information *State: *ZIP: Fax: *Folio (Property ID) Number(s) of the subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: 00724880001 & 00724520002 *Legal Description of subject property or properties [Attach list if necessary]: SEE Attached Street Address(es) where applicable, if already assigned: NA Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 1 of 2 Growth Management Communitv Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • xx x� x� .collicrcountvf Lvov Page 615 of 745 Collier County Project Information Acceptance of this form does not constitute project and/or street name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Official. Pre -approval of project name and/or street name may be requested by contacting us at GMD Addressing(cDcolliercountyfl.gov or 239-252-2482 prior to your submittal. Current Project Name: NA Proposed Project Name: Copperstone Estates Proposed Street Name: NA Latest Approved Project Number [e.g., SDP-94-##, PPL-2002-AR-####, PL2017000####] NA Submittal Requirement Checklist Additional documents may be attached to this form and can include. Checkmark the items included with this application: Requirements for Review: Required: LOCATION MAP and/or SURVEY showing the proposed project boundary. ❑x List of additional folio numbers and associated legal descriptions. E-mail from Addressing Official for any pre -approved project and/or street names. ❑ The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMCD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountvfl.qov/citvviewweb Questions? Email: Front. Desk(a-)colliercountyfl.gov Addressing Checklist 6/14/2024 Page 2 of 2 Growth Management Community Development • Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 • xx x� x� xollicrcountvf Lvov Page 616 of 745 PARCEL 1: Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Township 51 'South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18'29" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said right of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'46" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Page 617 of 745 8/11/25, 5:18 PM Print Map 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. https://maps.colIiera ppraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient= LANDS CAP E&paper=LETTER&minX=428844.010752227&minY=627241.816118777&maxX=429981.687141117&maxY=6�Wdgw�8-Of NF5 8/11/25, 5:20 PM Print Map 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. https://maps.colIiera ppraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient= LAN DSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=429122.562316808&minY=627232.096932779&maxX=429975.819608592&maxY=cPza$72 gj.9 of II INSTR 6323469 OR 6185 PG 3407 E-RECORDED 10/28/2022 11:57 AM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $5,250.00 REC $18.50 CONS $750,000.00 Prepared by & Return to: Michelle Roman Tropical Title 3375 Pine Ridge Road, Suite 204 Naples, FL 34109 2209P9953 Consideration $750,000.00 Warranty Deed Made this ��",;,,day of October, 2022 A.D. by Julio Cesar Garcia, Mar pled Person and Jesus H. Herrera, a Married Person, whose address is: 183 Price„Street, Naples, Florida 34113, hereinafter called the grantor(s), to Abdul Awan, a Married Person, whose address is: 1871 16th�Street NE, Naples, Florida 34120, hereinafter called the grantee(s): (Whenever used herein the term heirs, legal representatives and Witnesseth, that the grantor, for valuable considerations, receipt whereof, remises, releases, conveys and confirms Florida, viz: PARCEL 1: I "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the ividuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) sideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other f acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Townsh' 1South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the.,ast 1/4 corner of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line 6f.861d Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees"18'0,- West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the torn Deeinage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with�"said fight of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to tf�int of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance' of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'46" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54degres 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39' 44" West, a digapdb of. 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. ;Y /_1LN191 PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East,' Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Page 620 of 745 *** OR 6185 PG 3408 *** Parcel ID Number: 00724520002 This is not the homestead of the Grantor under the laws and constitution of the State of Florida in that neither Grantor nor any members of the household of Grantor reside thereon. Subject to zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; restrictions, covenants and easements of record; reservation of oil, gas and mineral rights of record. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Hay 0 t.Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the` rbnt 'h'` reby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the r for has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully w gants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; ana�^g d.�tfaid land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2021. In Witness Whereof, tie s first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in Witness 2 Printed Name h4arin Garcia State of Florida County of Collier r has signed and sealed these presents the day and year The foregoing instrument w s acknowledged before me by meanso physical presence or online notarization, this day of Octo r, 2022, by Julio CeZdprcia, us H. Herrera, who are persona My known or have produced a driver's ii a I Qtificatl n. (SEAL) EwV-4Vdq1PN ICHELLE P. RDF'sd Public Statmission N GGm. Expires Ough National Not'afy Public -r — Print Name: Michelle P. Roman My Commission Expires: Page 621 of 745 SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY: W202505328 Legal Description As Furnished: ti PARCELI: Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Township 51 'South, Range 26 East, Collier County, ti0 Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, /O Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 4�6 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 1829" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County s Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said right of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 3946" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 2016" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. LINE TABLE: L-1 N 54°20'16" W - 440.00' D. N 54°20'38" W - 440.08' M. L-2 N 54°20'16" W - 227.51' D. N 54'20'18" W - 227.53' M. L-3 N 35°39'44" E - 100.00' P. N 35*37'10" W - 99.93' C. L-4 N 54°20'16" W - 660.00' P. N 54°20'39" W - 659.90' M. T)u o'9R 6 S�811 00)RC� �2sr7 A)20006 7c 0 �0 6" . / \O (. S 40, F\e8 eA 7& �675 v ✓�2• + S S �3- \s' R5 G`V �O + o° ^Cb DO 81 1a a°o 00 GPI' oo�'�o� O" 2' 1 6' SBSss� ON SIGN 6+O S�O� >�q V 700 90 1101Az .79 RAJ c "!� '00, 9s� c s at;Qe \ \ 4��j1 : N A �� 1001 \ qsA� -9zzz ,o 7(91 o Sh' Cq tioS�B' F Ag sr °'ti "'o/ <AO �0'011, 40 �94, O007/ i7� O0 S%Aq�°�2�5 h� OA0/ ,(9 3��-f C 2°°2 P.O.C. AT FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 3, ■ TOWNSHIP 51 S, RANGE 26 E, CM/4'X4' DISC DU 00 N N N _N rb 0 rb I o0 CO rn C�oh 5 o B 4 tios�8„ 06 F s e® 0 Cij��� cT6 �92 c9& 00AqR�RCF e9 �9 Aso 00 628 3 N 89'18'29" W - 722.30' D. N 89'18'19" W - 722.28' C. Legal Description As Furnished: SSA PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier 10, County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: 0 �L From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance 612.6 feet, Westward, Section line, distance �L 76 76>>9z of thence perpendicular to the a of 97QAA 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way C line, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 2016" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Legend: Ci SIGN A.E. ACCESS EASEMENT FIND. FOUND P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NAIL B.F.E. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION I.D. IDENTIFICATION P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE 00.00' EXISTING ELEVATION B.R. BEARING REFERENCE I.R. IRON ROD RR M. PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT YL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT B.M. BENCHMARK CON-. SLAB I.P. IRON PIPE P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT C. CALCULATED L.B. LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS PKN PARKER-KALON NAIL M WATER VALVE o PROPOSED ELEVATION CAN CABLE N. M. FIELD MEASURED R. RADIAL C.B. CATCH BASIN IN& D. NAIL & DISK RIW RIGHT OF WAY <oj POWER POLE WATER FLOWARROW ASPHALT C.V.G. CONC VALLEY GUTTER N/A NOTAPPLICABLE R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY ® WELL I DISTANCE& BEARING LIMITARROW C.M. CONCRETE MONUMENT N.R. NON -RADIAL S.D. STORM DRAIN CONC. CONCRETE N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE T.B.M. TEMPORARY BENCH MARK CATCH BASIN ANCHOR ® BRICK PAVER C/O CLEAN OUT O.H.L. OVERHEAD LINE TEL TELEPHONE FACILITIES REAK LINE (NOT TO SCALE) C.U.E. COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT P. PLAT To TOP OF BANK D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT MY'. BOLLARD BENCH MARK ENTERLINE FENCE LINE ® WOOD DECK D.H. DRILL HOLE P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE W.M. WATER METER LAMPPOST OVERHEAD LINE EASEMENT LINE ELEC. ELECTRIC BOX P.C.P. PERMANENT CONTROL POINT ENCL ENCLOSURE P.LS PROFESIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 46 I.R. EDGE OF THE WATER LINE STONES E.O.W. EDGE OF WATER P.S.M. PROFESIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER O DRAIN MANHOLE �RINIARV STRUCTURE E.P. EDGE OF PAVEMENT P.T. POINTOFTANGENCY 11111 CONCRETE MONUMENT O$ SANITARY MANHOLE SECONDARYSTRUCTURE F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING G[ PRIMARY PROPERTYLINE ® WATER CENTER LINE SECONDARY PROPERTY LINE Surveyor's Notes: 0r 40' 80' DATE OF SURVEY DRAWN BY WILLIS SERVICE GROUP LLC. 06/23/2025 F.D. LEGAL1. DESCRIPTION PROVIDED SHOWNHER ONWERENOTEXAMINATION ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS OR OTHER RECORDED ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT. N 1 II inch - 80' ft. COMPLETION DATE: CHECKED BY 2. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, LAND SURVEYOR & MAPPER L.8.8419 EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM FROM ENCUMBRANCES OWNERSHIP, OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY. GRAPHIC SCALE 07 / 01 / 2025 M.F. 3. UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERE NOT LOCATED. WALLTIESARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALLANDARE NOTTO BE USED TO RECONSTRUCT BOUNDARY LINES. contact@willsservicegroup.com PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION 4. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE & ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND 303 N E 3RD AYE. STE 9 MAPPER. ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS LOCATED. Y IS INTENDED FOR OSE TO AGE PURPOSES ONLY. EXCLUSIVELY FOR THIS USE BY HOR Property Address: Parcel I.D.: County/State: WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS SURVEYISNGOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN ANY CAPE CORAL OTHER USE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. 13XXX Tamiami Trail East 00724880001 Collier / Florida 6. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO PROVE PLAT BOUNDARIES. FLORIDA- 33909 Naples FI 34114 00724520002 7. ONLY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WERE LOCATED. 8. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEETAND DECIMALS THEREOF. (239) 478 4242 Certified to: Legal Description As Furnished: 9. PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF RECORD. 10. EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM THE RECORDED PLAT. ANY OTHER EASEMENT (S) PROUDHOUSE BUILDERS LLC, It's PERTAINING TO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND (S) MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THIS "SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY"AND THE MAP OF See above THE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORIDA STATUTE "CHAPTER 5J-17" OF THE FLORIDAADMINISTRATIVE CODE. SURVEY RESULTING THERE FROM WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION successor's and/or assigns andthe 10.ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEAND BELIEF AND FURTHER, THAT SAID "SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY' MEETS THE INTENT Department of Housing and Urban IS PROHIBITED WITHOUTWRITTEN CONSENTOFTHE SIGNING PARTYOR PARTIES. OF THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR I& THE11.PARCEL Development their WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE CLIENT. ORIDN', PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5J-117../0515URVEYING STATE OF FLIMUM 052 FA.CNPURSUANT as Interests may appear. 12. FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT DETERMINED. TO SECTION 472.027 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES. 13.THE ACCURACY OF CONTROL SURVEY DATA SHALL BE VERIFIED BY REDUNDANT MEASUREMENTS OR Flood Zone Information: TRAVERSE CLOSURES. ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS SHALL ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING CLOSURES: COMMERCIAL/HIGH RISK LINEAR: V FOOT IN 10,000' FEET; 07-01-2025 Community Name: COLLIER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED SUBURBAN: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 7,500' FEET, AREAS RURAL: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 5,000' FEET, GUSTAVO I NTERIAN. Community Number: 120067 14.13EARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON N54°20'16"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORAND MAPPER L.S.6461 Panel: 0612 Suffix: J Effective Date: 02108/2024 AS PLATTED. STATE OF FLORIDA. Flood Zone: AE B.F.E = 8.0' O SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON NAVD1988 DATUM, BENCHMARK USED (X 718) WITH ELEvATIOnrloN OF ELEVATION 6.73'. SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY: W202505328A Leoal Description As Furnished PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 3944" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. LINE TABLE: L-1 N 35'39'44" E - 100.00' P. N 35'37'10" W - 99.93' C. �Q 00 }�} v IV 0` O Q IS 65 o � u2 / k'vo`�o�'s" 66 2y7 6'S9 .00 9j /Q •90, A ?0006'• 2l FO 06i • (y / F �Si • �� � Si8„ 0,' / 3 FL 7e � ESQ o r\6 ��FL�68" N 'v .� .7S9 1 ^TO I .e GL�` •� r�S ti O '1's RT 6-1;r— yFq ?7, Fg0� AAA 01 SIGN ��V A •// SIGN11.0 _ 700 Otis, �0 �< OAPr 1 s dry P.O. C. AT FROM THE EAST 114 CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 S, RANGE 26 E, A\ sr0 .11% 0, �' 1"�1� CMDISC s SA��,(/ 07 $ 420 - 7 2y F, 2 20 2?0os� �O Xtio /Z o •6 O �OS�ti /O F '/P40 S 0 /y0`s�8•, c�0e FTC O 60' SRO C\O: /I- +S�o°17s„ 2'h.tp sr 4� Ag�S1 O o°j o0�. h' oz o �O OU 3k A, � �O • O- V o 0 N N Gj 4, �CjjQ� V 5 JP nP4PnCv�� Q5 o0 rn rn FND. 5/8" I.R. CAP PARCEL ID.: 00724600003 N 89o18'29" W - 722.30' D. N 89*18'19" W - 722.28' C. Legend: A.E. ACCESS EASEMENT FIND. FOUND P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT B.F.E. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION I.D. IDENTIFICATION P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE AL NAIL 00.09 EXISTING ELEVATION B.R. BEARING REFERENCE I.R. IRON ROD P.R.M. PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT e� CONC. SLAB B.M. C. BENCHMARK CALCULATED I.P. L.B. IRON PIPE LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS P.U.E. PKN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PARKER-KALON NAIL N WATER VALVE DD'DD' PROPOSED ELEVATION o CAN CABLE N. M. FIELD MEASURED R. RADIAL C.B. CATCH BASIN IN& D. NAIL & DISK RIW RIGHT OF WAY <oj POWER POLE WATER FLOWARROW ASPHALT C.V.G. CONC VALLEY GUTTER N/A NOTAPPLICABLE R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY ® WELL I ' DISTANCE& BEARING LIMITARROW C.M. CONC. CONCRETE MONUMENT CONCRETE N.R. N.T.S. NON -RADIAL NOT TO SCALE S.D. T.B.M. STORM DRAIN TEMPORARY BENCH MARK CATCH BASIN ANCHOR ® BRICK PAVER C/O C.U.E. CLEAN OUT COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT O.H.L. P. OVERHEAD LINE PLAT TEL To TELEPHONE FACILITIES TOP OF BANK �'Y BOLLARD BEAK LINE (NOT TO SCALE) CENTERLINE D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT BENCH MARK FENCE LINE ® WOOD DECK D.H. DRILL HOLE P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE W.M. WATER METER LAMPPOST OVERHEAD LINE EASEMENT LINE ELEC. ENCL ELECTRIC BOX ENCLOSURE P.C.P. P.LS PERMANENT CONTROL POINT PROFESIONAL LAND SURVEYOR I.R. EDGE OF THE WATER LINE STONES E.O.W. EDGE OF WATER P.S.M. PROFESIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER O DRAIN MANHOLE P INIARV STRUCTURE E.P. EDGE OF PAVEMENT P.T. POINTOFTANGENCY CONCRETE MONUMENT O$ SANITARY MANHOLE SECONDARYSTRUCTURE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING �[ CENTER LINE PRIMAF.F.E. LINE SECONDARY PROPERTY SECONDARY PROPERTY LINE ® WATER WILLIS SERVICE GROUP LLC. contact@wiIIsservicegroup.com 303 NE 3RD AVE. STE 9 CAPE CORAL FLORIDA - 33909 (239) 478 4242 I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THIS "SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY"AND THE MAP OF SURVEY RESULTING THERE FROM WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEAND BELIEF AND FURTHER, THAT SAID "SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY' MEETS THE INTENT OF THE "MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA', PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5J-17.051 &.052 F.A.C. PURSUAN' TO SECTION 472.027 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES. 01 30' 40' DATE OF SURVEY DRAWN BY 06/23/2025 F.D. 1" inch = 60' ft. COMPLETION DATE: CHECKED BY GRAPHIC SCALE 07/01 /2025 M.F. PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION Property Address: Parcel I.D.: County/State: 13XXX Tamiami Trail East 00724680001 Collier/Florida Naples FI 34114 Certified to: Legal Description As Furnished: PROUDHOUSE BUILDERS LLC, it's See above successor's and/or assigns andthe Department of Housing and Urban Development as their interests may appear. Flood Zone Information: 07-01-2025 Community Name: COLLIER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS GUSTAVO INTERIAN. Community Number: 120067 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORAND MAPPER L.S.6461 Panel: 0612 Suffix: J Effective Date: 02108/2024 STATE OF FLORIDA. Flood Zone: AE B.F.E = 8.0' Surveyor's Notes: 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NO EXAMINATION OF TITLE MADE BY SURVEYOR. THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS OR OTHER RECORDED ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 2. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM FROM ENCUMBRANCES OWNERSHIP, OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY. 3. UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERE NOT LOCATED. WALLTIES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALLANDARE NOTTO BE USED TO RECONSTRUCT BOUNDARY LINES. 4. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE & ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS LOCATED. 5. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. EXCLUSIVELY FOR THIS USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. 6. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO PROVE PLAT BOUNDARIES. 7. ONLY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WERE LOCATED. 8. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEETAND DECIMALS THEREOF. 9. PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF RECORD. 10. EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM THE RECORDED PLAT. ANY OTHER EASEMENT (S) PERTAINING TO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND (S) MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORIDA STATUTE "CHAPTER 5J-17" OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 10.ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 11.PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BYTHE CLIENT. 12.FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT DETERMINED. 133HE ACCURACY OF CONTROL SURVEY DATA SHALL BE VERIFIED BY REDUNDANT MEASUREMENTS OR TRAVERSE CLOSURES. ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS SHALLACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING CLOSURES: COMMERCIAL/HIGH RISK LINEAR: V FOOT IN 10,000' FEET, SUBURBAN: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 7,500' FEET; RURAL: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 5,000' FEET; 14.BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON N54°20'16"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AS PLATTED. 1 5. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON NAVD1988 DATUM, BENCHMARK USED (X 718) WITH ELEVATION OF 6.73'. SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY: W202505228B Legal Description As Furnished: PARCEL 1: Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Township 51 'South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18'29" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said right of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'46" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39' 44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. LINE TABLE: L-1 N 35°39'44" E - 100.00' P. N 35*37'10" W - 99.93' C. L-2 N 54'20'16" W - 220.00' D. N 54'21'10" W - 220.08' M. Q. Z T-, ( �} 4 /` Q5 OA, �oIoo° Q OSZ) e a s� b c s `SS A2 c� sr 7 O7 6. OOq'S�C, ° / 200 P.O.C. ,2"600M THE � S� OS2/ /� �S/`/•C �OEAST 1/4 CORNER 7/4% OF SECTION 3, 5�81 p 67' 0� C TOWNSHIP 51 S, �e69,7 92�+�� � �0 , RANGE 26 E, 394 Se 20 DISC s 7 SS4°�2O" '9Cy 792A F 7 �,(1 20 ` O �'999 ° s .O00 3 • �6 p, �2 280 0.9,�,T�'o-9,Q 020 .005 �c Q -r o• . IPI N N C6 O OOb h V �O C,� JPQQ�Cv� CD vv o 0 OO� �soX - ce\ � gSAy 6 q 7 A6O' A /C Pc U 'S' ��� 09 4S ti Qo 542o°7s" 761, kL GG, '22) 22jS3 � O N9i Syo 62O; 200 )6!y 7, 7679 -7gA Legend: A.E. ACCESS EASEMENT FIND. FOUND P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT B.F.E. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION I.D. IDENTIFICATION P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE . NAIL B.R. BEARING REFERENCE I.R. IRON ROD P.R.M. PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT B.M. BENCHMARK I.P. IRON PIPE P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT C. CALCULATED L.B. LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS PKN PARKER-KALON NAIL pQ WATER VALVE CAN C.B. CABLE N. CATCH BASIN M. IN& D. FIELD MEASURED NAIL & DISK R. RIW RADIAL RIGHT OF WAY <oj POWER POLE C.V.G. CONC VALLEY GUTTER N/A NOTAPPLICABLE R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY ® WELL C.M. CONC. CONCRETE MONUMENT CONCRETE N.R. N.T.S. NON RADIAL NOT TO SCALE S.D. T.B.M. STORM DRAIN TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ® CATCH BASIN C/O C.U.E. CLEAN OUT COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT O.H.L. P. OVERHEAD LINE PLAT TEL To TELEPHONE FACILITIES TOP OF BANK �'Y BOLLARD D.E. DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT BENCHMARK D.H. ELEC. DRILL HOLE ELECTRIC BOX P.C. P.C.P. POINT OF CURVATURE PERMANENT CONTROL POINT W.M. WATER METER LAMPPOST ENCL E.O.W. ENCLOSURE EDGE OF WATER P.L.S P.S.M. PROFESIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PROFESIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER • I.R. O DRAIN MANHOLE E.P. EDGE OF PAVEMENT P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY CONCRETE MONUMENT O$ SANITARY MANHOLE F.F.E. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CENTERLINE I;. FND. 5/8" N 89'18'29" W -722.30' D. I.R. CAP N 89'18'19" W - 722.28' C. PARCEL ID.: 00724600003 00.09 EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATION CONC. SLAB O WATER FLOWARROW ASPHALT DISTANCE & BEARING LIMITARROW ANCHOR ® BRICK PAVER REAK LINE (NOT TO SCALE) CENTERLINE FENCE LINE ® WOOD DECK OVERHEAD LINE EASEMENT LINE EDGE OF THE WATER LINE STONES RY STRUCTURE SECO ARY STR URE PRIMARY TY LINE PRIMARY PROPERTY LINE SECONDARY PROPERTY LINE ® WATER 01 30' 60' DATE OF SURVEY DRAWN BY WILLIS SERVICE GROUP LLC. 06/23/2025 F.D. N 1" inch = 60' ft. COMPLETION DATE: CHECKED BY LAND SURVEYOR &MAPPER L.8.8419 GRAPHIC SCALE 07 / 01 / 2025 M.F. contact@willsservicegroup.com PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION 303 NE 3RD AVE. STE 9 Property Address: Parcel I.D.: County/State: CAPE CORAL 13XXX Tamiami Trail East 00724520002 Collier /Florida FLORIDA - 33909 Naples FI 34114 (239) 478 4242 Certified to: Legal Description As Furnished: PROUDHOUSE BUILDERS LLC, It's See above I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THIS"SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY"AND THE MAP OF SURVEY RESULTING THERE FROM WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION successor's and/or assigns andthe AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEAND BELIEF AND FURTHER, THAT SAID "SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY' MEETS THE INTENT Department of Housing and Urban OF THE "MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA", PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5J-17.051&.052 F.A.C. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES. Development as their interests may appear. 07-01-2025 GUSTAVO INTERIAN. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORAND MAPPER L.S.6461 STATE OF FLORIDA. Flood Zone Information: :ommunity Name: COLLIER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS :ommunity Number: 120067 'anel: 0612 Suffix: J Effective Date: 02108/2024 lood Zone: AE B.F.E = 8.0' Surveyor's Notes: 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NO EXAMINATION OF TITLE MADE BY SURVEYOR. THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS OR OTHER RECORDED ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 2. THIS CERTIFICATION IS ONLY FOR THE LANDS DESCRIBED. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM FROM ENCUMBRANCES OWNERSHIP, OR RIGHTS -OF -WAY. 3. UNDERGROUND PORTIONS OF FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERE NOT LOCATED. WALLTIES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALLANDARE NOTTO BE USED TO RECONSTRUCT BOUNDARY LINES. 4. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE & ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ONLY VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS LOCATED. 5. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. EXCLUSIVELY FOR THIS USE BY THOSE TO WHOM IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY OTHER USE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT. 6. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO PROVE PLAT BOUNDARIES. 7. ONLY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WERE LOCATED. 8. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEETAND DECIMALS THEREOF. 9. PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF RECORD. 10. EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM THE RECORDED PLAT. ANY OTHER EASEMENT (S) PERTAINING TO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND (S) MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR THE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORIDA STATUTE "CHAPTER 5J-17" OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 10.ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. 11.PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BYTHE CLIENT. 12.FENCE OWNERSHIP NOT DETERMINED. 133HE ACCURACY OF CONTROL SURVEY DATA SHALL BE VERIFIED BY REDUNDANT MEASUREMENTS OR TRAVERSE CLOSURES. ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS SHALLACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING CLOSURES: COMMERCIAL/HIGH RISK LINEAR: V FOOT IN 10,000' FEET, SUBURBAN: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 7,500' FEET; RURAL: LINEAR: 1 FOOT IN 5,000' FEET; 14.BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON N54°20'16"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AS PLATTED. 1 5. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON NAVD1988 DATUM, BENCHMARK USED (X 718) WITH ELEVATION OF 6.73'. COPPERSTONE ESTATES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEYREPORT Collier County Parcel ID #'s: 3-51-26-000100.017.06B03 & 3-51-26-000100.008.06B03 August 2025 Prepared For: Patriot Engineering Company c/o: Justin Ebrite, President / Project Manager 780 5th Ave South, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 Phone: (239) 308-0099 Ext. 101 Email: JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com Prepared By: BearPaws Environmental Consulting 1599 Covington Circle East Fort Myers FL 33919 Phone: (239) 340-0678 Email: BearPaws.Env.Consulting@GMail.com Page 625 of 745 Introduction An environmental assessment and protected species survey were conducted on the Copperstone Estates property on August 28, 2025, by Barrett Stejskal and Christina Stejskal, environmental consultants with BearPaws Environmental Consulting, who have over 20 years of experience in Southwest Florida. The 4.04f acre site is located in Section 3, Township 51 S, and Range 26E, of Collier County, Florida. More specifically, the site is located north of Tamiami Trail East and Trail Ridge Road, east of Mondago Lane, and west of Hendersen Creek in Naples, Florida. Please see the attached Project Location Map (Exhibit A). The purpose of this assessment was to identify all natural/native areas, such as wetlands and unique upland areas on -site per Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Section 3.05.00, Vegetation Removal, Protection, and Preservation. The site was also inspected to determine the potential of listed (endangered, threatened, etc.) species inhabiting the site per the Collier County LDC, Section 3.04.00, the Protection of Endangered, Threatened, or Listed Species, as well as any Listed Plant Species, as identified in Collier County LDC, Section 3.04.03. Protection afforded to these listed plants is designed to provide limited relocation of seed or individual plants if they do not already occur naturally in the proposed preserve area. Specific attention was provided in locating any listed species that could inhabit the site. These listed (endangered, threatened, etc.) species are regulated by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and/or the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Specific attention was paid toward identifying any gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows, as well as locating any potential fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) nests, red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and/or Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) cavity trees, and red -shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus) nests. The project's surrounding land uses are a mixture of residential developments, multi -family developments, and undeveloped forested land. The survey was conducted in the morning; the temperatures were in the mid to upper 80's; there was a light breeze; and mostly sunny skies. Methodology The survey method consisted of overlapping belt transects performed for all vegetation communities on - site in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 3.08.00, Environmental Data Requirements. This survey is comprised of a several step process. This survey is comprised of a several step process. First, vegetation communities or land -uses on the study area are delineated using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Next, the FLUCFCS codes are cross- referenced with the Protected Species List. This protected species list names the species which have a probability of occurring in any particular FLUCFCS community. The vegetation communities or land -uses on the study area are delineated on an aerial photograph using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Next, these FLUCFCS codes are cross-referenced with the Protected Species List. With a list of the potential listed plants and animals, each FLUCFCS community is searched in the field for these species. An intensive pedestrian survey is conducted using parallel belt transects as a means of searching for protected plants and animals. Signs or sightings of these species are then recorded. Page 626 of 745 Existing Site Conditions Boundary — The boundary was obtained from Patriot Engineering and is assumed to be approximately 4.04± acres. Soils - The soils on the property have been mapped by the National Resource Conservation Service (MRCS, formerly the Soil Conservation Service). These mappings are general in nature, but can provide a certain level of information about the site as to the possible extent of wetland area. The agencies commonly use these mappings as justification for certain wetland/upland determinations. According to these mappings, the parcel is underlain by Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum — urban land complex (MRCS #114; hydric), Oldsmar fine sand, limestone substratum — urban land complex (MRCS #124, non-hydric). Please see the attached NRCS Soils Map (Exhibit D). Vegetation Descriptions — Vegetation is one parameter used in determining the presence of uplands or wetlands; these community mappings will generally reflect what a specific area could be considered by the regulatory agencies. We did not observe any wetland or "other surface water" communities on -site during the site inspection. While on -site, generalized community delineations are hand -drawn on an aerial defining the different vegetation associations on -site. These general delineations were based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Level III and IV (FDOT 1999). Please see the attached FLUCFCS Map with Aerial (Exhibit B) and FLUCFCS Map without Aerial (Exhibit Q. Listed below are the vegetation communities and land -uses identified on the site. FLUCFCS Codes & Community Descriptions Uplands The following community areas have been designated as upland habitats. Uplands are any area that does not qualify as a wetland because the associated hydrologic regime is not sufficiently wet enough to elicit development of vegetation, soils, and/or hydrologic characteristics associated with wetlands. FLUCFCS 411 E3 Mixed Upland Forest (50-74% Exotics) —1.64f Acres This upland community type occupies approximately 1.64f acres of the property. Exotic species such as earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominate >75% of this community. The canopy contains slash pine (Pinus elliottii), with live oak (Quercus virginiana), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). It was noted that there were quite a few slash pines in the canopy were impacted by pine beetle infestation and have died as a result. The sub -canopy contains cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). The groundcover was dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), with various opportunistic weedy species. Commonly observed vines include greenbriar (Smilax sp), grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered as uplands by the regulatory agencies. Page 627 of 745 FLUCFCS 420 E4 Mixed Upland Forest (>75% Exotics) — 2.40f Acres This upland community type occupies approximately 2.40f acres of the property. Exotic species such as earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominate >75% of this community. The canopy contains slash pine (Pinus elliottii), with live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), java plum (Syzygium cumini), and mahogany (Swietenia mahagoni). The sub -canopy contains cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), and rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). The groundcover was mostly absent, with scattered various opportunistic weedy species, due to density of canopy and sub -canopy vegetative coverage. Commonly observed vines include greenbriar (Smilax sp.), grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered uplands by the regulatory agencies. Table 1. FLUCFCS Community Table FLUCFCS Code Community Description Classification Acres 411 E3 Mixed Upland Hardwoods Exotics 50-74% Upland 1.64f Ac. 420 E4 Mixed Upland Hardwoods Exotics >75% Upland 2.40f Ac. Total 4.04f Ac. Listed Species Results During our field survey for protected species on the property; the site was inspected to determine the potential of listed (endangered, threatened, etc.) species inhabiting the site per the Collier County LDC, Section 3.04.00, the Protection of Endangered, Threatened, or Listed Species, as well as any Listed Plant Species, as identified in Collier County LDC, Section 3.04.03. During this species survey, protected species or signs thereof were not observed. There were no nest -like structures or tree cavities noted. There were no gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows identified on -site; there were burrows believed to belong to that of the eastern nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus), that were identified, but not flagged in the field. The various listed species that may occur in the FLUCFCS communities on -site have been tabulated on the attached table below. Please see the attached Protected Species Map (Exhibit E). Summary & Discussion Due to the disturbed nature of the site, the abundance of exotic plant species, the surrounding land uses, and the busy roads/highways, it is unlikely that this site supports or would provide habitat for protected species. Generalized community locations were estimated and hand -drawn on a non -rectified aerial with approximate habitat boundaries, hence their location and aerial extent is approximate. The determination of ecological system classifications, functions, values, and boundaries is an inexact science, and different individuals and agencies may reach different conclusions. The on -site conditions can vary throughout the year; therefore, the findings of this survey were based upon the site conditions at the time of the inspection. It is not possible for BearPaws Environmental Consulting to guarantee the outcome Page 628 of 745 of such determinations; therefore, the conclusions of this report are preliminary in nature and would require a full review by the appropriate regulatory agencies. The information contained and the work performed as part of this initial assessment, conforms to the standards and generally accepted practices in the environmental field, and was prepared substantially in accordance with then -current technical guidelines and criteria. The conclusions of this report represent the results of our analysis of the information provided by the client and their consultants, together with information gathered in the course of the study. No other guarantee, expressed or implied, is made. Page 629 of 745 Table 2: Listed Species by Habitat with Current Status FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Common Name Scientific Name Percent Coverage Observed USDA FDA&CS FWS FWC 411 Pine Flatwoods Beautiful paw -paw Deerin othamnus pulchellus 90 E E E Big cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia 90 SSC Florida bonneted bat Eumo s oridanus 90 E E Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corals cou eri 90 T T Fakahatchee burmannia Burmannia ava 90 E Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus 90 SAT T Florida coontie Zamia oridana 90 C Gopher frog Rana areolata 90 SSC Gopher tortoise Go herus polyphemus 90 T T Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis 90 E SSC Satinleaf Chrysophyllum olivae orme 90 T Southeastern American Kestrel Falco s arverius paulus 90 T 420 Mix Upland Forest Beautiful paw -paw Deerin othamnus ulchellus 90 E E E Big cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia 90 SSC Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais cou eri 90 T T Fakahatchee burmannia Burmannia ava 90 E Florida black bear Ursus americanus oridanus 90 SAT T Florida coontie Zamia floridana 90 C Gopher frog Rana areolata 90 SSC Gopher tortoise Go herus polyphemus 90 T T Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis 90 E SSC Satinleaf Chrysophyllum olivae orme 90 T Southeastern American Kestrel Falco s arverius paulus 90 T C = Commercially Exploited, SAT = Similarity of Appearance Threatened, SSC = Species of Special Concern, T = Threatened, E = Endangered Table designates listed species with potential to occur in each FLUCFCS community. Page 630 of 745 Exhibit A Project Location Map Page 631 of 745 STATE OF FLORIDA i ' Pensacola Tallahassee Lake city lacksonvllle 1.0 St Aog-lne Panama City Galnesvllle Ocala Daytona Beach 9 eDeland Orlando Cape Canaveral Lakeland 'eraden[on F[ Pierce Okeechobee' `Sarasota Port Charlott Wesi Palm Beach NFt myers Naples Ft --dale Key West m Q Q RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK D z U Q �n - 05 w v) 0 J m � d' W J J O � G � PROJECT LOCATION EF f' ♦ rI � DRAWN BY: DATE: CATEGORY ♦ PAGE BWS 9/2/25 LOCATION Copperstone Estates JOB NUMBER SCALE: NTS EXHIBIT S/T/R COUNTY Location Map10.0NMENtAI(ONSULTN4 (4i.gl°. 'r"y`oerga@'7/52S/24E COLLIER 239)340-0678 bp-- ag a � o Exhibit B FLUCFCS Map with Aerial Page 633 of 745 � ��.✓ � r _ � � � +gyp � �� ` � ~^ t��A` r' � . - l - .yell - k� a_.L"6J� l - - JJr or VI! l�ly.- f M�� _ �s:► �� - ��i �� _ �, �,• T 'ice' -�, •1� �•t`f' Scale: 1" = 100' y y�w ,' '` '�• 'fir_ ` 420 E4 `.,' `�s* : _ =.� r. _ 4 as �:.-zor if .� -j�r '� �-/ -••�.t'-4�� '�.����� �_.��y� � _ -r iT.,: - �. .��r�'�Yl��bffff —� .,e� .• ate''-�' ''�3•.r;• - 'Cr ..I�..1i���`l�`- 1 _+y '" �` ' ;� C �a _ t$— i► A J� t--'yam }Y��Ij� Vt r _ , ;- (1.64 Ac.±) lot — rr \ :1 may' 4 •? x-NOTES: FLUCFCS lines estimated from 1 "=200'aerial photographs and locations approximated. FLUCFCS Project FLUCFCS per Florida Lind Use, Code Acreage Description Pine ••• • 1 •t v s Y System (FLUCFCS) •• Z.. =�-.. fromAerial photographs were acquired ;; . suer. Exhibit C FLUCFCS Map Page 635 of 745 N Scale: 1" = 100' 420E4 (2.40 AC.±) 411E3 (1.64 AC.±) FLUCFCS Table Page 636 of 745 Exhibit D NRCS Soils Map Page 637 of 745 N Scale: 1" = 100' 114 124 114 NOTES Soils were acquired from CABINS and are from the NRCS. Revisions Date: Drawn By: Date: Category Pa g e Bws 9/2/25 Copperstone Estates Soils Job Number 1'Sca11001 So i I s Map County ENV�RONMEN14ONSW.iIN6 Exhibit S/T/R 7/52S/24E Collier 1599 Co ,g1DnC-1,Ea,`Fo My—.FL339'9 39)340-0698 — ('bcvvPewc cnv consWtl^SC�gmeil NRCS Soils Table Soils No. Name Hydric 114 Holopaw Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum -Urban Land Complex, Yes 0 To 2 Percent Slopes 124 Oldsmar Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum -Urban Land Complex, No 0 To 2 Percent Slopes Page 638 of 745 Exhibit E Protected Species Survey Map Page 639 of 745 N \ \ Scale: V = 100' \ 42.QE4 \ \ \ �\\(2.40 \ Ace) \ \ `\ \ \ \ \\\411E3\\ ` \ (1.64 AC.±) \ \ \ Tota 1 4.04 NOTES: FLUCFCS lines estimated from Legend 1 "=200' aerial photographs and locations approximated. n / Protected Species FLUCFCS per Florida Land Use, V Survey Transects Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999). Revisions Date: Drawn By: Date: Category Pa e g BwS 9/2/25 Copperstone Estates PSS -fa jib � Job Number Scale: 111001 P Map County S1N.t ENVIRONMENTAL (ONIN6 Exhibit S/T�R 7/SZS/Z4E Collier 1599Co,ingtonCimlcEa,t,yortMyc,,,6L33919 (239)34P-0678 b... pa— env.consuMq(wgm Hl — FLUCFCS Table FLUCFCS Code Description Project Acreage 411 E3 Pine Flatwoods (Exotics 50-74%) 1.64 420 E4 Mixed Upland Hardwoods (Exotics > 75%) 2.40 Page 640 of 745 PATRIOT ENGINEERING COMPANY Traffic Impact Statement Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest) Collier County, Florida 3rd Submittal Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule: Methodology Review - $500 Fee Minor Study - $750 Fee Prepared By: Deven Long, PE Patriot Engineering Company 780 5th Ave S. I Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 Phone: 239-308-0099 Email: DLong@PatriotEngCo.com Engineering Business Registry #37157 PEC Project #72-250805 0011111111111 No 90473 • : * i Q� STATE OFRIO •,• ;�� THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY DEVEN LONG, P.E. ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL. PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. Page 641 of 745 Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement January 2026 Page 1 TIS Revisions - I" Sufficiency Review The traffic study was revised in response to Collier County development review comments (Review Letter 1) and to reflect design changes for site access as directed by the Florida Department of Transportation. The revisions made to the traffic study are as follows: • The project has been renamed to Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest). • Traffic volumes in Exhibit 5 were updated for minor corrections • FDOT Pre-app meeting notes are included in Appendix E. • The driveway connection on US 41 has been updated to indicate right-in/right-out only access. TIS Revisions — 2nd Sufficiency Review The traffic study was revised in response to Collier County development review comments (Review Letter 2). The revisions made to the traffic study are as follows: • Growth rates in Exhibit 5 were updated to reference the minimum adjusted growth rates reported in the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet as requested by staff. The growth rates from the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet are provided in Appendix F. Proiect Description The Copperstone RPUD (the project) is a proposed new development. The rezone application seeks to allow up to a maximum of 12 single-family dwelling units. The proposed development is assumed to be built -out by year 2030. The project (FOLIO Numbers 00724880001 & 00724520002) is located on the north side of the US 41 / Trail Ridge Road intersection. This traffic study (minor study) has been prepared consistent with Collier County traffic impact statement guidelines and standard practices accepted by Collier County. A methodology meeting was held with Collier County Transportation Planning staff by email to verify the requirements of this TIS, Appendix A. Land Use Summary The project seeks a maximum total of 12 dwelling units. The proposed land uses are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Land Use Summary Proposed Use Size Single -Family Residential 12 dwelling units PATRIOT ENGINEERING COMPANY 780 5TH AVE S. I SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34102 PHONE: (239)308-0099 WWW.PATRIOTENGINEERINGCOMPANY.COM PAT R 10 T ENCPage �4 of 745 Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement January 2026 Page 2 City Ar.r.aec The project's conceptual access points are depicted in the site plan (Appendix B). Access to the site will be provided via a new driveway connection on US 41. A pre -application meeting with FDOT was held on November 4, 2025 to address ROW access permitting, turn -lane, and stormwater crossing requirements for the proposed access (Appendix E). The driveway access is proposed to be restricted to right -in / right -out access to comply with FDOT connection standards. Proiect Trip Generation The trip generation estimates for the project were based on trip generation rates and equations from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 12th (Appendix Q. The detailed trip generation calculation for the project is presented in Exhibit 2 and is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Trip Generation mary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Dail In Out Total In Out Total Total Net New External Trips 4 10 14 9 5 14 362 Proiect Trip Distribution and Assignment The project's net new external trips (PM peak hour) were distributed and assigned to the external road network as depicted in Exhibits 3 and 4, respectively. The project trip distribution/assignment is also shown in tabular format as part of the roadway link analysis (Exhibit 5). The trip distribution/assignment was performed manually based on professional engineering judgement. Background Traffic In order to forecast background traffic volumes from existing (2024) to future (2030) traffic conditions, two methods were performed (whichever resulted in higher volumes was used): • Applying the minimum adjusted growth rates reported in the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet to the 2024 AUIR peak hour directional volumes. The growth rates from the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet are provided in Appendix F. • Summing up the 2024 AUIR peak hour directional volumes and the trip bank volume. Existing and future roadway background traffic volumes without the project are provided in Exhibit 5 as part of the roadway link analysis. 5-Year CIE Roadway Network Exhibit 5 summarizes the service volumes and LOS standards reported by the 2024 AUIR for the existing road network. Roadway improvements that are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIE) are considered committed improvements for purposes of this TIS. PATRIOT ENGINEERING COMPANY 780 5TH AVE S. I SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34102 PHONE: (239)308-0099 WWW.PATRIOTENGINEERINGCOMPANY.COM PATRIOT ENCPage �4 of 745 Copperstone Estates RPUD January 2026 Traffic Impact Statement Page 3 No roadway improvements are committed for construction within the study area. It is noted that Collier Boulevard from Manatee Road to north of Tower Road (widening from 4L to 6L) has been deferred for construction beyond 2030. Roadway Link Analysis / Proiect Impacts to Area Roadway Network The roadway link analysis is provided in Exhibit 5. Based on the Collier County TIS criteria for significant impacts on roadways (i.e., the 2%, 2%, and 3% criteria), the project has no significant impacts on any roadways under study. All segments of US 41 under study will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service under future conditions with the project. The following segments are forecasted to operate below the adopted level of service standard with and without the project: • Collier Boulevard from Davis Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road • Collier Boulevard from US 41 to Manatee Road The project is not attributed to causing any road deficiencies under future traffic conditions. Access Separation Standards and Turn Lane Requirements The project's driveway will be located on a portion of US 41 that is designated Roadway Access Class 3 with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The established spacing standard is 660 feet between driveway connections, full median openings and signals spacing is 2,640 feet. The proposed driveway is considered conforming due to the connection spacing exceeding 660 feet. Future turning movement volumes at the project entrance do not warrant a westbound right -turn lane based on the 2023 FDOT Access Management Guidebook. The forecasted traffic volumes do not satisfy the guidelines set forth in the NCHRP Report 457, Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering _ Study Guide. The forecasted traffic volumes plotted on the applicable figure from NCHRP Report 457 is provided as part of Exhibit 6. PATRIOT ENGINEERING COMPANY 780 5TH AVE S. I SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34102 PHONE: (239)308-0099 WWW.PATRIOTENGINEERINGCOMPANY.COM PAT R I O T ENCPage �f44�of 745 Exhibit 1 Project Location The ci£i$SIi.6 fvquntry Qluta atLely Rea4rt 0 Eagle Lakes munity Park [;fi{fin RO Lely Resort i O Eagle Craek Golf and Caunley Club Belle Meade silvE.: RV and CL; —I.J.' Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Verona Walk Minding Cypress Project Location PATRIOT Page 645 of 745 Exhibit 2 Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Trip Generation (ITE 12th Edition) Proposed Uses AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR DAILY LAND USE LUC SIZE UNITS Rate/Equation In Out Total % Rate/Equation In Out Total % Rate/Equation Total % Single -Family Detached Housing (General Urban/Suburban) 210 12 Dwelling Units Fitted Curve 27% 4 73% 10 14 Fitted Curve 62% 9 38% 5 14 Fitted Curve 362 1 Net New External Trips 4 10 14 100% 9 5 14 100% 362 100% Page 646 of 745 Exhibit 3 Project Trip Distribution The Ci£i$SIf.6 ivquntry Qluta atLely Rea4rt 0 951 z• Eagle Lakes munity Park pr-cz S1 c Lely Resort Verona Walk ° Winding Cypress �o Project Location i O , Eagle Creek Golf and N Caunley Club Belle Meade M.+IaLUL RSA SilvEir La'Kes RV Resori and GLlfCIJdi Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement 1! "er P, �m Vt t� Yk PATRIOT Page 647 of 745 Exhibit 4 Project Trip Assignment PM Peak Hour — Net New External TO The G1a4 fvquntry Ci ., At LPly Rasart k Verona Walk ETIJ tF-11 z• I_ely Resort Eagle Lakes munity Park 4� O Winding OCypress {�� Project Location O O Engle Creek Golf and v, Caunty CI11� I ♦� Y III 1�� III I Belle Meade si l'w RV and ;-.- .. Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement C .nnihin _9i Ur r. Inbound M Outbound Yk PATRIOT Page 648 of 745 Exhibit 5 Copperstone Estates RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Roadway Link Analysis Based on 2024 AUIR Roadway Links Existing Conditions(') CIE (2) Future Background Traffic (Peak Hour Peak Direction) Project Traffic Isl Future Traffic Conditions With Project AUIR ID# Roadway Link From To Existing # of Lanes Adopted LOS Existing Service Volume Peak Hour Peak Direction 2024 AUIR Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume V/SV Ratio (Existing Conditions) CIE # of Lanes CIE Service Volume Peak Hour Peak Direction Growth Rate Method Trip Bank Method 2030 Background Traffic Used ") Peak Direction Project Traffic Distribution (%) Project Trip Assignment (PM Peak) Impact Standard Project Impact (%) Significant Impact? 2030 Traffic with Project Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume V/SV Ratio With Project LOS Standard Exceeded With Project? Growth Rate Growth Factor (3) (2024-2030) 2030 Background Traffic Trip Bank 2030 Background Traffic NB/EB SB/WB 34.0 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D E 3,000 2,500 0.833 6D 3,000 2.00% 1.1262 2,816 749 3,249 3,249 NB 40% 1 3 3% 0.10% No 3,250 1.083 Yes 35.0 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D E 3,200 2,140 0.669 6D 3,200 2.00% 1.1262 2,410 384 2,524 2,524 NB 40% 1 3 2% 0.09% No 2,525 0.789 No 36.1 Collier Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway 6D E 2,500 2,400 0.960 6D 2,500 2.02% 1.1275 2,706 148 2,548 2,706 NB 10% 1 1 2% 0.04% No 2,707 1.083 Yes 36.2 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road 4D D 2,000 2,400 1.200 4D 2,000 2.78% 1.1788 2,829 123 2,523 2,829 NB 10% 1 1 3% 0.05% No 2,830 1.415 Yes 94.0 US41 Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D E 3,000 1,570 0.523 6D 3,000 2.00% 1.1262 1,768 243 1,813 1,813 EB 40% 4 2 2% 0.13% No 1,817 0.606 No 95.1 US41 Collier Boulevard Project Entrance 6D E 3,100 1,000 0.323 6D 3,100 4.00% 1.2653 1,265 449 1,449 1,449 EB 90% 8 4 2% 0.26% No 1,457 0.470 No 95.1 US41 Project Entrance Joseph Lane 6D E 3,100 1,000 0.323 6D 3,100 4.00% 1.2653 1,265 449 1,449 1,449 EB 10% 1 1 1 2% 0.03% No 1,450 0.468 No 95.2 US41 Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D D 2,000 1,000 0.500 4D 2,000 4.00% 1.2653 1,265 266 1 1,266 1,266 EB 10% 1 1 1 2% 0.05% No 1,267 0.634 No 95.3 US41 Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U D 1,075 310 0.288 2U 1,075 4.00% 1.2653 392 149 459 459 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.09% No 460 0.428 No 96.0 US41 San Marco Drive SR 29 26 D 1,000 250 0.250 2U 1,000 2.00% 1.1262 282 24 274 282 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.10% No 283 0.283 No 97.0 US41 SR 29 Dade County Line 2U D 1,000 230 0.230 2U 1,000 2.00% 1.1262 259 8 238 259 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.10% N0 260 0.260 No Note(s): SV designated as "Constrained" with SV increase +10%. (1) Existing conditions as reported by Attachment F of the Collier County 2024 AUIR/CIE. (2) Roadway improvements that are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Element (CIE). (3) Growth factor= (1+r)" where r = growth rate and n = number of years. (4) Future background traffic used in the link analysis reflects the higher of: 1) Applying a growth rate (minimum adjusted growth rate from the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet) to the AUIR peak hour directional volumes; or 2) Summing the AUIR peak hour directional volumes and the trip bank volume. (5) Based on project's net new external trips, distribution, and assignment for the PM peak hour of adjacent street. Page 649 of 745 Exhibit 6 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major -road right -turn bay at a two-way stop -controlled intersection. INPUT Roadway geometry: 4-lane roadway Variable Value Major -road speed, mph: 50 Major -road volume (one direction), veh/h: 1457 Right -turn volume, veh/h: 9 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting right -turn volume, veh/h: 13 Guidance for determining the need for a major -road right -turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Do NOT add right -turn bay. 140 120 > 100 m 80 0 > 60 c L 40 20 W 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Major -Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Page 650 of 745 Appendix A Methodolou Page 651 of 745 Deven Long From: Deven Long Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:10 PM To: michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Cc: Justin Ebrite Subject: Eaglecrest PUD TIS Methodology - PL20250009053 Attachments: Eaglecrest TIS Methodology.pdf Michael, Attached is the TIS methodology for the subject project for your reference. Thankyou, Deven Long, PE Vice President / Project Manager Patriot Engineering Company Veteran Owned and Operated Phone: 239-308-0099 EBR# 37157 Mobile: 239-851-7388 Fax: 239-308-4750 Email: DLong(aWatriotEngCo.com 780 5th Ave S. I Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 www.PatriotEngineeringCompany.com (D � 'n (i Page 652 of 745 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: Time: Location: Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Deven Long„ PE Organization: Patriot Engineering CoMpany LLC Address & Telephone Number: 780 5th Ave S. I Suite 200, Naples, FL 34102; Cell: 239-851-7388 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name & Title: Organization & Telephone Number: Applicant: Applicant's Name: Eaglecrest Luxury Villas, LLC Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Eaglecrest RPUD Location: FOLIO Numbers 00724880001 & 00724520002 Land Use Type: Single -Family Detached Housing (General Urban/Suburban) ITE Code #: 210 Proposed number of development units: 12 dwelling units Other: Description: https.Ilpatriotengineeringco.sharepoint.com/sites/Projects/Shared Documents173 Eaglecrest Luxury Villasi72-250805 Eaglecrest RPUD/Engineering/TIS/Methodology Report/Eaglecrest TIS Methodology.docx Page 653 of 745 Zoning Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See Attached Study Type: Minor Study Study Area: Boundaries: Based on County's 2%, 2%, and 3% impact rule — see attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: none Horizon Year(s): 2030 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation (12th Edition) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 5-year CIE Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Attached Trip distribution method: Manual/Professional Engineering Judgement Traffic assignment method: Manual/Professional Engineering Judgement Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County AUIR Report, but not less than 2% for back rg ound or vested trips method, whichever is greater. Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: https.Ilpatriotengineeringco.sharepoint.com/sites/Projects/Shared Documents173 Eaglecrest Luxury Villasi72-250805 Eaglecrest RPUD/Engineering/TIS/Methodology Report/Eaglecrest TIS Methodology.docx Page 654 of 745 Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: SIWSATURES �, � MKI- Stu Preparer Reviewers Applicant https.Ilpatriotengineeringco.sharepoint.comisitesIProjectsIShared Documents173 Eaglecrest Luxury Villasi72-250805 Eaglecrest RPUD/Engineering/TIS/Methodology Report/Eaglecrest TIS Methodology.docx Page 655 of 745 Eagle Lakes Immunity Park P,.C� St Gnfhn Rd Eagle Creek Golf and Country Club Eaglecrest RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Exhibit 1 TIS Methodology Project Location Ti.. 1 Lely Resort K,t FI.A Verona Walk t� le6� Winding Cypress Project Location � O Belle Meade Silver Lakes RV Resort and Golf Club m C hani pmnyh! �iO e� Ur C� C�rr� PATRIOT Page 656 of 745 TIS Methodology Exhibit 2 Ea¢lecrest RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Trip Generation (ITE 12th Edition) Proposed Uses AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR DAILY LAND USE LUC SIZE UNITS Rate/Equation In Out Total % Rate/Equation In Out Total % Rate/Equation Total % Single -Family Detached Housing (General Urban/Suburban) 210 12 Dwelling Units Fitted Curve 27% 4 73% 10 14 Fitted Curve 62% 9 38% 5 14 Fitted Curve 362 1 Net New External Trips 4 10 14 100% 9 5 14 100% 362 100% Page 657 of 745 0 y. c Lely Resort Eagle Lakes Country Club munity Park n of 0 6" ,o z 2 P,.C� St f Exhibit 3 Project Trip Distribution rI , , w Lely Resort ",I a A, �b 0 1 Eagle Creek O Golf and Country Club Eaglecrest RPUD Traffic Impact Statement TIS Methodology Verona Walk Winding Cypress 90� 0 Project Location O )� Belle Meade Silver Lakes RV Resort and Golf Club m C hani pmnyh! �iO e� Ur �, S" ,,�PR C1 C�rr� PATRIOT ENGINEERING COMPANY Page 658 of 745 Exhibit 4 Protect Trip Assignment PM Peak Hour — Net New External Tri Lely Resort Eagle Lakes Country Club munity Perk n m m RO•G O L // ♦a O 2 P,.CC St Gnfhn Rd 0 Lely Resort l I JF-11 tea, O Eagle Creek Golf and Country Cl Belle Meade fd.Ia1rr Rd s11Vel , i., .. RV Resort and Golf Club Eaglecrest RPUD Traffic Impact Statement K t;E— c' TIS Methodology Verona Walk Winding Cypress J Project Location C hani pin, O �nl Dr Cyr Inbound Outbound PATRIOT Page 659 of 745 TIS Methodology Exhibit 5 Eaglecrest RPUD Traffic Impact Statement Roadway Link Analysis Based on 2024 AUIR Roadway Links Existing Conditions") CIE Ixl Future Background Traffic (Peak Hour Peak Direction) Project Traffic is) Future Traffic Conditions With Project AUIR ID# Roadway Link From To Existing # of Lanes Adopted LOS Existing Service Volume Peak Hour Peak Direction 2024 AUIR Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume V/SV Ratio (Existing Conditions) CIE # of Lanes CIE Service Volume Peak Hour Peak Direction Growth Rate Method Trip Bank Method 2030 Background Traffic Used ") Peak Direction Project Traffic Distribution (%) Project Trip Assignment (PM Peak) NB/EB SB/WB Impact Standard Project Impact (%) Significant Impact? 2030 Traffic with Project Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume V/SV Ratio With Project LOS Standard Exceeded With Project? Growth Rate Growth Factor 13) (2024-2030) 2030 Background Traffic Trip Bank 2030 Background Traffic 34.0 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D E 3,000 2,500 0.833 6D 3,000 4.00% 1.2653 3,163 749 3,249 3,249 NB 40% 1 3 3% 0.10% No 3,250 1.083 Yes 35.0 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D E 3,200 2,140 0.669 1 6D 3,200 2.00% 1.1262 2,410 384 2,524 2,524 NB 40% 1 3 2% 0.09% No 2,525 0.789 No 36.1 Collier Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway 6D E 2,500 2,400 0.960 6D 2,500 3.75% 1.2472 2,993 148 2,548 2,993 NB 10% 1 1 2% 0.04% No 2,994 1.198 Yes 36.2 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road 4D D 2,000 2,400 1.200 4D 2,000 3.75% 1.2472 2,993 123 2,523 2,993 NB 10% 1 1 3% 0.05% No 2,994 1.497 Yes 94.0 US41 Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D E 3,000 1,570 0.523 6D 3,000 2.00% 1.1262 1,768 243 1,813 1,813 EB 40% 4 2 2% 0.13% No 1,817 0.606 No 95.1 US41 Collier Boulevard Project Entrance 6D E 3,100 1,000 0.323 6D 3,100 2.00% 1.1262 1,126 449 1,449 1,449 EB 90% 8 4 2% 0.26% No 1,457 0.470 No 95.1 US41 Project Entrance Joseph Lane 6D E 3,100 1,000 0.323 6D 3,100 2.00% 1.1262 1,126 449 1,449 1,449 EB 10% 1 1 2% 0.03% No 1,450 0.468 No 95.2 US41 Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D D 2,000 1,000 0.500 4D 2,000 2.00% 1.1262 1,126 266 1,266 1,266 EB 10% 1 1 2% 0.05% No 1,267 0.634 No 95.3 US41 Greenwa Road San Marco Drive 2U D 1,075 310 0.288 2U 1,075 4.00% 1.2653 392 149 459 459 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.09% No 460 0.428 No 96.0 US41 San Marco Drive SR 29 2U D 1,000 250 0.250 2U 1,000 2.00% 1.1262 250 24 274 274 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.10% No 275 0.275 No 97.0 US41 SR 29 Dade County Line 2U D 1,000 130 0.230 2U 1,000 2.00% 1.1262 240 8 238 240 EB 10% 1 1 3% 0.10% No 241 0.241 No Note(s): * SV designated as "Constrained" with SV increase +10%. (1) Existing conditions as reported by Attachment F of the Collier County 2024 AUIR/CIE. (2) Roadway improvements that are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement Element (CIE). (3) Growth factor = (1+r)" where r = growth rate and n = number of years. (4) Future background traffic used in the link analysis reflects the higher of: 1) Applying a growth rate (minimum 2% growth rate) to the AUIR peak hour directional volumes; or 2) Summing the AUIR peak hour directional volumes and the trip bank volume. (5) Based on project's net new external trips, distribution, ans assignment for the PM peak hour of adjacent street. Page 660 of 745 Appendix B Site Plan Page 661 of 745 NATIVE PRESERVE CALCULATION LOCATED IN COASTAL HIGH HAZARD ZONE, LAND USE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE IS LESS THAN 5 AC & GREATER THAN 2.5 AC THEREFORE 25%PRESERVATION REQUIRED ITEM AREA (SF) AREA (AC) TOTAL SITE 1.64 AC OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25 (25%) = 0.41 AC REQUIRED NATIVE PRESERVATION PROVIDED= 0.42± AC TOTAL SITE AREA 176,000 SF 4.04 AC 100.00% OPEN SPACE CALCULATION 30%MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 52,800 SF 1.21 AC 30.00% 0.3 X 4.04AC =1.21 AC MIN. REQUIRED -1.21± AC OPEN SPACE PROVIDED PRESERVE 2,000 SF 0.05 AC 1.14% RESIDENTIAL (R) 121,200 SF 2.78 AC 68.86% ZONING:C4 USE: COMMERCIAL NOTES: Q` \1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE THROUGH sQ LOCAL AND STATE PERMITTING AT TIME OF SDP. 0 �% 2. NO BUFFER REQUIRED WHERE PRESERVE ABUTS PROPERTY LINE ZONING: PUD / O1%�� OP USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE SETBACKS UNITS COUNT & DENSITY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT O� PRIMARY - 25' DENSITY: 3 PER AC ZONED: 35' ACCESSORY -10' MAX. UNITS: 12 ZONING: A ZONING: PUD USE:VACANT USE: RESIDENTIAL / 15.0' TYPE "B" BUFFER 10.0' TYPE "A" BUFFER R \ / WATER NATIVE PRESERVE (TYP.) MANAGEMENT (TYP.) ' ZONING: A USE:VACANT 15.0' TYPE "D" BUFFER INGRESS/EGRESS l NO BUFFER REQUIRED (2) NO BUFFER REQUIRED (2) ZONING: A USE:VACANT ONIN DEPU N I Ci 200 ZONING: CPUD �F \ NG: C E: ACAN ZONING: CPUD US E:M B E HOME PARKS LEGEND: WATER MANAGEMENT R RESIDENTIAL AREA o �o0 20 aoo PRESERVE 4-► INGRESS/EGRESS -- BUFFER G HICSCALE 1"=200IF . PROJECT: COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD TITLE: EXHIBIT C - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN SHEET #: 1 * REVISIONS PATRIOT REV 1 11-19-2025 PER COUNTY COMMENTS ENGINEERING COMPANY \780 5th AVE S. I SUITE 200 \ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 PHONE: (239) 308-0099 / FAX: (239) 308-4750 W VIW.PATRIOTENGINEERINGCOMPANY.COM FL EBR# 37157 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation, 1211 Edition Data and Rates Page 663 of 745 Land Use: 210 Single -Family Detached Housing Description A single-family detached housing site includes any single-family detached home on an individual lot. Atypical site surveyed is a suburban subdivision. Specialized Land Use Data have been submitted for several single-family detached housing developments with homes that are commonly referred to as patio homes. A patio home is a detached housing unit that is located on a small lot with little (or no) front or back yard. In some subdivisions, communal maintenance of outside grounds is provided for the patio homes. The three patio home sites total 299 dwelling units with overall weighted average trip generation rates of 5.35 vehicle trips per dwelling unit for weekday, 0.26 for the AM adjacent street peak hour, and 0.47 for the PM adjacent street peak hour. These patio home rates, based on a small sample of sites, are lower than those for single-family detached housing (Land Use 210), lower than those for single-family attached housing (Land Use 215), and higher than those for senior adult housing -single- family (Land Use 251). (Source 1008) Additional Data The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in Alabama, Arizona, British Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, and West Virginia. Source Numbers 356, 357, 367, 384, 387, 407, 435, 522, 550, 552, 579, 598, 601, 603, 614, 637, 711, 716, 720, 728, 735, 868, 869, 903, 925, 936, 1005, 1007, 1008, 1010, 1033, 1066, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1204, 1221, 1225, 1236, 1251, 1265, 1267 230 Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition • Volume 3 its Page 664 of 745 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 155 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 261 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.09 3.47 - 23.80 2.29 Data Plot and Equation u 1 a 30000 20000 iIIIINIII , , , X X , , , , X X X, X 0 0- 0 fX 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 8.07(X) + 265.45 2000 - - - - - Average Rate RI= 0.94 3000 itsGeneral Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 231 Page 665 of 745 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 153 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 239 Directional Distribution: 27% entering, 73% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.70 0.22 - 2.27 0.26 Data Plot and Equation 2000 w a F 1000 i H u 0 1000 2000 3000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.67(X) + 5.59 RI= 0.89 232 Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition • Volume 3 its Page 666 of 745 Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 166 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 266 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.93 0.35 - 2.98 0.33 Data Plot and Equation W a F i H 3000 2000 1000 u 0 1000 2000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 0.33 - - - - - Average Rate R2= 0.90 itsGeneral Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 233 Page 667 of 745 Appendix D AUIR Excerpts Page 668 of 745 ANNUAL UPDATE & INVENTORY REPORT/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SCHEDULE UPDATE ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2024 AUIR/CIE COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER August 23, 2024 Prepared bk Comprehensive Planning Section Zoning Division Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Page 669 of 745 Attachment "F" 57 58 61 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUHt) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2024 2023 Net Percent 2024 2024 Traffic Hour' Peak Peak Change Change 2024 Counts + 2024 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour In Volume In Volume Total Counts + Trip Bank Counts + L Year Year TCMA or Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir From From Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# CIE# TCEA Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std * Dir Volume Volume Volume 2023 2023 Bank Volume Canacitv V/C S Deficient Deficient 1.0 NW-TCMA CR31 Airport Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D N 2,200 1150 1120 30 2.61% 3 1153 1047 52.4% B 2.1 55 NW-TCMA CR31 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 6D 599 E N 3,000 2200 2190 10 0.45% 37 2237 763 74.6% C 2.2 55 NW-TCMA CR31 Airport Road Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 503 E N 3,000 2330 2270 60 2.58% 43 2373 627 79.1% D 3.0 39 CR31 Airport Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 502 E N 3,000 2180 2150 30 1.38% 11 2191 809 73.0% C 4.0 CR31 Airport Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 533 E N 2,800 2280 2090 190 8.33% 3 2283 517 81.5% D 5.0 3 CR31 Airport Road Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 553 E N 2,800 2360 2080 280 11.869/6 0 2360 440 84.3% D 2033 6.0 3 TCEA CR31 Airport Road Davis Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 552 E S 2,700 1720 1470 250 14.53% 5 1725 975 63.9% C 7.0 TCEA Bayshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Thomasson Drive 4D 521 D S 1,800 820 730 90 10.98% 62 882 918 49.0% B 8.0 31 CR 865 Bonita Beach Road West of Vanderbilt Drive Hickory Boulevard 4D 653 D E 1,900 1110 1000 110 9.91 % 0 1110 790 58.4% C 9.0 Carson Road Lake Trafford Road Immokalee Drive 2U 610 D N 600 290 290 0 0.00% 39 329 271 54.8% B 10.0 33 County Barn Road Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2U 519 D S 900 370 380 -10 -2.70% 54 424 476 47.1% B 11.0 CR29 CR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Everglades City 2U 582A D S 1,000 160 180 -20 -12.50% 0 160 840 16.0% B 12.0 TCEA SR84 Davis Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Airport Road 6D 558 E E 2,700 1590 1420 170 10.69% 35 1625 1075 60.2% C 13.0 48 SR84 Davis Boulevard Airport Road Lakewood Boulevard 4D 559 D E 2,000 1530 1460 70 4.58%1 0 1530 470 76.5% C 14.0 49 EC-TCMA SR84 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 658 D E 2,000 1690 1660 30 1.78% 56 1746 254 87.3% D 2032 15.0 83 EC-TCMA SR84 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 538 D E 2,200 1550 1500 50 3.23% 203 1753 447 79.7% D 16.1 83 1 EC-TCMA SR84 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road 6D 560 1 E I E 3,3001 900 8601 40 4.44% 921 992 2308 1 30.1% B 16.2 83 EC-TCMA SR84 Davis Boulevard Radio Road Collier Boulevard 6D 601 E W 3,300 1240 1220 20 1.61% 215 1455 1845 44.1% B 17.0 62 CR876 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 4D 531 D E 2,300 2300 2030 270 11.74% 24 2324 (24) 101.0% E 2025 Existing 18.0 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 530 E E 2,700 2020 1790 230 11.39% 0 2020 680 74.8% C 19.0 5 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 6D 507 E E 3,550 3170 3010 160 5.05%1 0 3170 380 89.3% D 2030 20.1 74 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 508 E E 3,550 3300 3240 60 1.82% 0 3300 250 93.0% D 2027 2027 20.2 74 EC-TCMA CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road I-75 6D 691 E E 3,550 35501 3370 180 5.07% 28 3578 (28) 100.8% F 2025 Existing 21.0 74 EC-TCMA CR886 Golden Gate Parkway I-75 Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 509 E E 3,300 2350 2270 80 3.40% 10 2360 940 71.5% C 22.0 EC-TCMA CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 605 D * E 1,980 1650 1520 130 7.88% 6 1656 324 83.6% 1 D 2034 23.0 19 NW-TCMA CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N 1,000 690 700 -10 -1.45% 26 716 284 71.6% C 24.1 65 NW-TCMA CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Drive 4D 595 E N 2,400 1420 1410 10 0.70% 2 1422 978 59.3% C 24.2 65 NW-TCMA CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 581 E N 2,400 1610 1630 -20 -1.24%1 3 1613 787 67.2% C 25.0 88 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ride Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 505 E N 3,000 1940 1880 60 3.09% 1 1941 1059 64.7% C 26.0 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 504 E S 2,700 2990 27601 230 7.69% 4 2994 (294) 110.9o/u F Existing Existing 27.0 87 EC-TCMA Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 2U 642 D E 900 820 750 70 8.54% 0 820 80 91.1% D 2029 2029 29.0 NW-TCMA Gulfshore Drive 11 Ith Avenue Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 583a D N 800 220 220 0 0.00% 0 220 580 27.51/. B 30.1 37 CR951 Collier Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 655 E N 3,000 2050 1870 180 8.78% 163 2213 787 73.8% 1 C 30.2 37 CR951 Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E S 3,000 1760 1580 180 10.23% 47 1807 1193 60.2% C 31.1 85 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Pine Ridge Road 6D 536 E N 3,000 2750 2530 220 8.00%1 81 2831 169 94.4% D 2028 2027 31.2 85 EC-TCMA CR951 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 6D 536 E N 3,000 27501 2530 220 8.000/o 71 2821 179 94.0% D 2028 2027 32.1 76 EC-TCMA CR951 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky 4D 525 D N 2,300 1570 1470 100 6.37% 41 1611 689 70.0% C 32.2 76 EC-TCMA CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 D N 2,300 1920 1980 -60 -3.13% 58 1978 322 86.0% D 2032 32.3 76 EC-TCMA CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal I-75 8D 607 E N 3,600 1920 1980 -60 -3.13% 210 2130 1470 59.2% C 33.0 61 EC-TCMA SR951 Collier Boulevard I-75 Davis Boulevard 8D 573 E N 3,600 3260 3020 240 7.36% 181 3441 159 95.61/o E 2027 34.0 86 CR951 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 602 E N 3,000 2500 2120 380 15.20% 749 3249 (249) 108.3% F Existing 35.0 86 TCEA CR951 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 6D 603 E N 3,200 2140 2250 -110 -5.14% 384 2524 676 78.9% D 36.1 12 TCEA SR951 Collier Boulevard US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Wal-Mart Driveway 6D 557 E N 2,500 24001 23101 90 3.750/6 148 2548 (48) 101.9% F 2027 Existing 12 Page 670 of 745 Attachment "F" 57 58 61 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUHt) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2024 2023 Net Percent 2024 2024 Traffic Hour' Peak Peak Change Change 2024 Counts + 2024 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour In Volume In Volume Total Counts + Trip Bank Counts + L Year Year TCMA or East Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir From From Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# CIE# TCEA Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std * Dir Volume Volume Volume 2023 2023 Bank Volume Canacitv V/C S Deficient Deficient 36.2 SR951 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Road 4D 557 D N 2,000 2400 2310 90 3.75% 123 2523 (523) 126.2% F Existing Existing 37.0 12 SR951 Collier Boulevard Manatee Road Mainsail Drive 4D 627 D N 2,200 1840 1830 10 0.54% 121 1961 239 89.2% D 2031 38.0 51 SR951 Collier Boulevard Mainsail Drive Marco Island Bridge 4D 627 D N 2,200 1840 1830 10 0.54% 61 1901 299 86.4% D 2032 39.0 64 NW-TCMA CR846 I I Ith Avenue N. Gulfshore Drive Vanderbilt Drive 2U 585 D E 700 310 330 -20 -6.459/6 0 310 390 44.3% B 40.0 1 NW-TCMA CR846 11 Ith Avenue N. Vanderbilt Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 613 D E 900 630 610 20 3.17% 0 630 270 70.0% C 41.1 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 566 E E 3,100 2040 1990 50 2.45% 26 2066 1034 66.6% C 41.2 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 6D 625 E E 3,100 2620 2690 -70 -2.67% 27 2647 453 85.4% D 2032 42.1 6 NW-TCMA CR846 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 567 E E 3,100 2930 2830 100 3.41% 3 2933 167 94.6% D 2027 2027 42.2 6 NW-TCMA CR846 hnmokalee Road Livingston Road I-75 613/813 679 E E 3,500 3140 3020 120 3.82% 56 3196 304 91.3% D 2029 43.1 8 CR846 Immokalee Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 613/813 701 E E 3,500 2640 2590 50 1.89% 277 2917 583 83.3% D 2034 43.2 CR846 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 656 E E 3,200 3030 2870 160 5.28% 598 3628 (428) 113.4% F 2026 Existing 44.0 71 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 3040 2600 440 14.47% 683 3723 (423) 112.8% F 2027 Existing 45.0 71 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 2560 2370 190 7.42% 822 3382 (82) 102.5% F Existing 46.0 73 CR846 Immokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 600 580 20 3.33% 233 833 67 92.5% D 2027 47.0 66 Lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 500 480 20 4.00% 138 638 162 79.7% D 48.0 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 550 590 -40 -7.27% 17 567 433 56.7% C 49.0 22 EC-TCMA Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1430 1550 -120 -8.39% 18 1448 452 76.2% C 50.0 79 Logan Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 770 760 10 1.30% 11 781 219 78.19/o C 2032 51.0 21 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 6/413 673 D N 3,000 1570 1600 -30 -1.91% 37 1607 1393 53.6% B 52.0 57 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 2100 1740 360 17.14% 0 2100 1000 67.7% C 53.0 58 NW-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E N 3,100 1560 1630 -70 4.49% 0 1560 1540 50.3% B 54.0 52 EC-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1390 1470 -80 -5.76% 6 1396 1704 45.0% B 55.0 53 EC-TCMA CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 1780 1760 20 1.12% 0 1780 1220 59.3% C 58.0 67 N. 1st Street New Market Road SR-29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 720 660 60 8.33% 20 740 160 82.21/o D 2032 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 800 750 50 6.25% 20 820 80 91.10/0 D 2028 2027 61.0 36 Camp Keais Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,000 340 330 10 2.94% 291 631 369 63.1% C 62.0 68 NW-TCMA CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 547 D N 1,000 1130 1120 10 0.880/0 0 1130 (130) 113.0% F Existing Existing 63.0 NW-TCMA CR896 Seagate Drive Crayton Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 4D 511 D E 1,700 890 920 -30 -3.37% 0 890 810 52.4% B 64.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 2140 2060 80 3.74% 0 2140 660 76.4% D 65.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E E 2,800 2330 2290 40 1.72% 3 2333 467 83.3% D 2034 66.0 14 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 3370 3270 100 2.97% 4 3374 (574) 120.5% F Existing Existing 67.1 41 NW-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 526 E E 3,900 3600 3600 0 0.00% 0 3600 300 92.3% D 2029 2029 67.2 41 EC-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,900 3920 2840 1,080 27.55% 13 3933 (33) 100.8% F Existing Existing 68.0 41 EC-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2690 2470 220 8.18% 0 2690 110 96.1% E 2027 2027 69.0 15 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1080 1050 30 2.78% 0 1080 720 60.0% C 70.0 15 EC-TCMA CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1620 1560 60 3.70% 0 1620 180 90.0% D 2030 71.0 16 EC-TCMA CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 700 680 20 2.86% 43 743 1057 41.3% B 72.0 17 TCEA CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D E 1,800 1180 1190 -10 -0.85% 70 1250 550 69.4o/o C 73.0 17 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 517 D E 1,800 980 940 40 4.08% 49 1029 771 57.2% C 74.0 17 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D E 1,900 960 900 60 6.25% 106 1066 834 56.1% C 75.0 77 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 800 720 80 10.000/0 215 1015 1885 35.0% B 76.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1580 1570 10 0.63% 14 1594 506 75.9% C 77.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 2180 2100 80 3.67% 39 2219 881 71.6% C 13 Page 671 of 745 Attachment "F" 57 58 61 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUHt) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2024 2023 Net Percent 2024 2024 Traffic Hour' Peak Peak Change Change 2024 Counts + 2024 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour In Volume In Volume Total Counts + Trip Bank Counts + L Year Year TCMA or Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir From From Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# CIE# TCEA Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std * Dir Volume Volume Volume 2023 2023 Bank Volume Canacitv V/C S Deficient Deficient 78.0 56 EC-TCMA Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 1600 1720 -120 -7.50% 217 1817 1283 58.6% C 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake -Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 1060 1010 50 4.72% 403 1463 1637 47.21% B 80.0 SR29 SR 29 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) 2U 615A D N 900 170 160 10 5.88% 0 170 730 18.9% B 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr) I-75 2U 615A D N 900 170 160 10 5.88% 0 170 730 18.9% B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 170 160 10 5.88% 81 251 649 27.9% B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 510 530 -20 -3.92% 79 589 311 65.41/. C 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 630 560 70 11.11% 194 824 876 48.5% B 85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 680 690 -10 -1.470/. 141 821 79 91.2% D 2030 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 680 690 -10 -1.47% 94 774 126 86.0% D 2033 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 300 300 0 0.00% 14 314 486 39.3% B 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 890 950 -60 -6.74% 67 957 (157) 119.6% F Existing Existing 91.0 43 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 1950 1700 250 12.82% 102 2052 848 70.81/o C 92.0 47 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2740 3080 -340 -12.41% 235 2975 (75) 102.6% F 2027 Existing 93.0 46 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 2370 2290 80 3.38% 382 2752 248 91.7% D 2030 94.0 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 1570 1690 -120 -7.64%1 243 1813 1187 60.4% C 95.1 TCEA US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 E E 3,100 1000 1030 -30 -3.00% 449 1449 1651 46.8% B 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D 1 608 D I E 2,0001 1000 1030 -30 -3.00% 2661 1266 734 1 63.3% C 95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road San Marco Drive 2U 570 D E 1,075 310 250 60 19.35% 149 459 616 42.7% B 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E 1,000 250 250 0 0.00% 24 274 726 27.4% B 97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 Dade County Line 2U 616A D E 1,000 230 240 -10 -4.35% 8 238 762 23.81% B 98.0 71 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3,100 2160 2160 0 0.00% 14 2174 926 70.1% C 99.0 50 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 3140 3130 10 0.32%1 83 3223 (123) 104.0% F Existing Existing 100.0 45 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E * N 3,410 2740 2630 110 4.01%1 10 2750 660 80.6% D 101.0 45 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 20601 2540 -480 -23.30% 0 2060 1040 66.5% C 102.0 NW-TCMA US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E * N 3,410 2370 2430 -60 -2.53% 32 2402 1008 70.4% C 108.0 TCEA Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 698 D E 800 460 470 -10 -2.17% 72 532 268 66.5% C 109.0 42 NW-TCMA CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U/4D 524 E * E 1,540 1110 1030 80 7.21% 0 1110 430 72.1% C 110.1 23 NW-TCMA CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 4D 646 D E 1,900 1240 1510 -270 -21.77% 0 1240 660 65.39/o C 110.2 23 NW-TCMA CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 4D/6D 666 D E 2,500 1860 1850 10 0.54% 0 1860 640 74.4% C 111.1 63 NW-TCMA CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Road 6D 579 E E 3,000 2760 2770 -10 -0.36%1 0 2760 240 92.0% D 2027 2027 111.2 63 NW-TCMA CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Road Logan Blvd. 6D 668 E E 3,000 2800 2680 120 4.29% 78 2878 122 95.9% E 2026 2026 112.0 24 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 580 E E 3,000 2220 2170 50 2.25% 136 2356 644 78.5% D 2032 114.0 25 NW-TCMA CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Bonita Beach Road Wiggins Pass Road 2U 548 D N 1,000 570 570 0 0.00% 33 603 397 60.3% C 115.0 NW-TCMA CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 1 I Ith Avenue 2U 578 D N 1,000 570 560 10 1.75% 13 583 417 58.3% C 116.0 26 Westclox Road Carson Road SR 29 2U 611 D W 800 280 240 40 14.29% 0 280 520 35.0% B 117.0 NW-TCMA CR888 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) 2U 669 D E 1,000 440 410 30 6.82% 13 453 547 45.3% B 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Road Golden Gate Boulevard 2U 650 D S 900 420 360 60 14.29% 115 535 365 59.4% C 119.0 CR858 Oil Well Road Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 4D 725 D * E 2,200 1370 1300 70 5.11 % 1066 2436 (236) 110.7% F Existing 120.0 CR858 Oil Well Road Everglades Boulevard Desoto Boulevard 2U 694 D E 1,100 610 550 60 9.84% 687 1297 (197) 117.9% F Existing 121.1 Oil Well Road Desoto Boulevard Oil Well Grade 2U 694 D E 1,100 610 550 60 9.84% 664 1274 (174) 115.8% F Existing 121.2 Oil Well Road Oil Well Grade Ave Maria Blvd 4D 728 D E 2,000 580 500 80 13.79% 348 928 1072 46.4% B 122.0 Oil Well Road Ave Maria Blvd SR 29 2U 730 D E 800 200 240 -40 -20.00% 1061 306 494 38.3% B 123.0 Golden Gate Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 18th Street NE/SE 4D 652 D E 2,3001 1900 17601 140 7.37% 681 1968 332 85.6% D 2030 14 Page 672 of 745 Attachment "F" 57 58 61 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUHt) Based on Adopted LOS, Trip Bank and Traffic Counts Peak 2024 2023 Net Percent 2024 2024 Traffic Hour' Peak Peak Change Change 2024 Counts + 2024 w/TB Counts Trip Bank Peak Dir Hour Hour In Volume In Volume Total Counts + Trip Bank Counts + L Year Year TCMA or Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir From From Trip Trip Bank Remaining Trip Bank O Expected Expected ID# CIE# TCEA Road# Link From To Road Sta. Std * Dir Volume Volume Volume 2023 2023 Bank Volume Canacitv V/C S Deficient Deficient 123.1 Golden Gate Boulevard 18th Street NE/SE Everglades Boulevard 4D 652 D E 2,300 1900 1760 140 7.37% 6 1906 394 82.9% D 2031 124.0 Golden Gate Boulevard Everglades Boulevard Desoto Boulevard 2U 722A D E 1,010 340 360 -20 -5.88% 17 357 653 35.3% B 125.0 EC-TCMA CR896 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 535 D E 2,400 1840 1780 60 3.26% 7 1847 553 77.0% C 132.0 Randall Boulevard Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 2U 651 D E 900 890 790 100 11.24% 289 1179 (279) 131.1% F 2025 Existing 133.0 Randall Boulevard Everglades Boulevard DeSoto Boulevard 2U 721A D E 900 170 150 20 11.76% 85 255 645 28.4% B 134.0 Everglades Boulevard I-75 Golden Gate Blvd 2U 637S D S 800 620 570 50 8.06o/u 34 654 146 81.8% D 2031 135.0 Everglades Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road 2U 636S D N 800 540 480 60 11.11% 249 789 11 98.6% D 2025 136.0 Everglades Boulevard Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 2U 635S D N 800 920 750 170 18.48% 11 931 (131) 116.4% F Existing Existing 137.0 DeSoto Boulevard I-75 Golden Gate Boulevard 2U 639A D S 800 200 230 -30 -15.00% 0 200 600 25.0% B 138.0 DeSoto Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Oil Well Road 2U 638A D S 800 210 200 10 4.76% 17 227 573 28.4% B 142.0 NW-TCMA Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 2D 647 D * W 1,320 710 650 60 8.45% 32 742 578 56.2% C 143.0 NW-TCMA Orange Blossom Drive Airport Road Livingston Road 2U 647 D W 1,000 710 650 60 8.45% 48 758 242 75.8% C 144.0 TCEA Shadowlawn Drive US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Davis Boulevard 2U 523 D N 1 8001 3201 3001 20 6.25% 01 320 1 480 1 40.0% 1 B * Segment designated as "Constrained" with SV increase +10% Level of service calculations for road facilities means calculations for peak hour traffic on a roadway segment for maximum service volumes at the adopted LOS eak hour is calculated as the 100th highest hour based on a 10 month period (omitting February and March), which is generally equivalent to the 250th highest our for a twelve (12) month period. For design of roadway capacity projects, the 30th highest hour for a 12-month period at LOS "D" will be utilized. (LDC Section .02.03 C.) 15 Page 673 of 745 Appendix E FDOT Pre -Application Meeting (11/4/25) Minutes & Notes Page 674 of 745 Deven Long From: Cando, Jonathan<Jonathan.Cando@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 4:04 PM To: karim@blueprintpal.com; Deven Long; Justin Ebrite Cc: Nelson, Keri; Weng, Randy Subject: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management Pre-app meeting minutes Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, Below are the meeting minutes for Access Management Access Management Cat. B comments: a. Provide a copy of the Concurrency Study. b. Provide a truck turning template using largest anticipated vehicle, showing in and out, and on -site circulation to ensure it will not create operational or safety concerns. c. Driveway to be designed following FDOT standards: 28' wide, 16' ingress, 12' egress, 35 radius d. The proposed modification to the existing driveway will be considered conforming due to corridor being an Access Classification 03, speed of 50 mph, spacing exceeds the minimum requirement of 660' (connection spacing for roads greater than 45 mph). am still pending comments for the proposed directional left turn, but keynote, the existing median opening is currently non -conforming, I can't see access granting an additional opening. For the Fort Myers OPS Center, we will deny this request. Page 675 of 745 Table 2D1.4.2 Dula 14-97 - Arterial Access C Ias ef Spacing (feet) SX .ti Median r ti yService Restrictive with � ��� � ,� � 20 Roads Restr icti e 6 0 13 4 N ors -Re stricti ve 6 0 .5 Restrictive 440 245 660 6 N orb -Re stricti ve 440 245 i Bath Mediafl Ty I s. 125 330 ICJ o*es : (1) "Restrictive- physically prevent vehicle crossing. r2; "Non -Restrictive- a11ow turns across at any point. (3) Speeds show in this table are posted speeds. Page 676 of 745 j onathan. candogdot. state. fl.us Page 678 of 745 Deven Long From: James, Caitlyn <Caitlyn.James@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 2:20 PM To: Barnhill, Dwayne; Cando, Jonathan; Deven Long; Justin Ebrite; karim@blueprintpal.com; Weng, Randy; Nelson, Keri; Swann, Rob; McCaughey, Erica; D1-Systems Planning Cc: Etheridge, Kristen; Carroll, Dennis; Carroll, Dennis Subject: Re: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management Attachments: Drainage Comments 11.4.25 Eaglecrest PUD - Access Management.docx External Email Warning Warning: Sender Caitlyn.James@dot.state.fl.us is not yet trusted by your organization. Please be careful before replying or clicking/downloading the attachment and URLs. Report Phishig Mark as Safe powered by Graphus° Good afternoon, Drainage recommendations are attached. As mentioned in today's meeting, a survey has not yet been gathered for this location, therefore assumptions were given. Let me know if you have any questions. ***All pre -application meetings are non -binding. These meeting notes are not intended to be all-inclusive of errors and omissions. It should not be assumed that any issues that were not addressed are acceptable to the Department. The permittee or representative is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment, and the quality of their work. Thank you, Drainage Designer IV Florida Department of Transportation -District One 801 N. Broadway Avenue Bartow, FL 33830 (863)519-2586 Click here for the FDOT D1's Drainage Connection Permitting Town Hall Video Page 679 of 745 .0 From: Barnhill, Dwayne <Dwayne.Barnhill@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 11:28 AM To: Cando, Jonathan <Jonathan.Cando@dot.state.fl.us>; Deven Long <Dlong@PatriotEngCo.com>; JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com <JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com>; karim@blueprintpal.com <karim@blueprintpal.com>; Weng, Randy <Randy.Weng@dot.state.fl.us>; Nelson, Keri <Keri.Nelson@dot.state.fl.us>; James, Caitlyn <Caitlyn.James@dot.state.fl.us>; Swann, Rob <Rob.Swann@dot.state.fl.us>; McCaughey, Erica <Erica.McCaughey@dot.state.fl.us>; D1-Systems Planning <D1-SystemsPlanning@dot.state.fl.us> Cc: Etheridge, Kristen <Kristen.Etheridge@dot.state.fl.us>; Carroll, Dennis <Dennis.Carroll@dot.state.fl.us>; Carroll, Dennis Subject: RE: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management Please see attached standard guidelines and roadway checklist if your design changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. ***All pre -application meetings are non -binding. These meeting notes are not intended to be all-inclusive of errors and omissions. It should not be assumed that any issues that were not addressed are acceptable to the Department. The permittee or representative is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment, and the quality of their work. Provide Plans in 11"x17" PDF format with the maximum scale 1" = 50'. (Please print a CHECK SET pdf with the "Actual" Option to check the Graphical Scales prior to Submittal). (Minimum text size = 0.06) Specific Roadway Characteristics: Design speed: 55 FDM 210-lane widths (12' travel 12' auxillary) FDM 214- driveway follow driveway profile: Fdm 214.4.2 (curb and gutter) (if applicable) FDM 212-turnlane: 55mph 350' decel length with keyhole and 10' shoulders 5' paved (if applicable) FDM 215 roadway safety Clear Zone 30' travel 18' auxillary FDM 222 sidewalk Cntxt class C3C 6' required (existing sidewalks along frontage) Driveway layout: Page 680 of 745 al + Typicaf Ffalf Section For tow I rypjcaf Half Serrjon For YofUme/RealdentfM ConnerUpns rligfler Vofarme canneeteooa �u,r —r� RIW LinePointof Conne[Upn as 9mie r kn the Pfans o5 Orrermined pp rbe J:ngimmr. OfaLlage Pipie fsee lUp[e 1 TTTTT7TT �ftoadNak D;trfl ��i�l IL Sane as a�rNpsiie _ - Y � I 111111 �tx-f Shoulder true o Edge of Traver way flare P_T. ITyp.J I I Ppinr fT}p.J Dave MOM and Artgee PLAN S17puJtler Sad (See Opposite) w,djel iVmrms, ;'A w Draeoage Pepe fMN'k Piro—, Mitered End Section eTWA) rsee endex 43}022) DRAINA6E SECTION 5 7-TT7-T 6? ,F �,— Roadwar Ftch — LOT 5floufder S' Min. fw Priwprc I}rivew4sy fi' rden. for 57de Roods RILW tine 11 11 - �� Sid Shoulder true Ferge of Travel Waq Fdgm of Tr ev e Paved Oriveway Apron fit A rordanre _ with $Heef 2 W 2 ar a$ Shown in tht Ram. Sflaurder Sod flee Ondex 445-001) Roadway Shoulder. Drirewar Taper pr D Tiyewmy Auxieiary Lanes- Trimf WaF Paved or &railed DreMewap Exi5!rnR or Proposed Drive Std. Ppinr Of Cimner[,oa DRIVEWAY PROHLE AND END VIEW ?4 FLUSH SHOULDER ROADWAY - DRIVEWAY C'OIVSTRUCTION L ASr a D6SCRrPT1Q1v: FY 0 24-25 REVISION III rlPB F� STANDARD PLANS Typical Section Asbuilt in the area: 3 Page 681 of 745 I EXr5TING rAMIANI CANAL * SMALL BE STABILIZED WTrr CoiwC. D1rCH PAYT. z' CONC. b)TCH RAPT, I NAY+JiiA1_ GkOUND I �Co-n. SAF2A1f R WALL . {5F€ A""ILJ TRAFFIC DATA CVRrifNT YeAA = 20�4 AADT - !4.)00 ESTIMATED OPEAOxC- rEAR - 2016 AADT = 1A,2AQ ESTIMATED DESIGN YEAR = 2036 AADT - 59.700 v = )1.1% A = 54.7-A r - 13.4 (24 HOVRJ OESrGN H007i T . 6.7% �FEED = 55 NPH a€v��roxs AEYISFD umoT5 4F GAAYITY WAU Guardrail Design Option 17s STAMOARA CJ AR1N6 AND GRUSE V 5 A r 61' CON5T. I R}W 12 Y 'luu .5MLDR_ FAVF.— VAAIE5 li1+R I rrPE 8 STABILIZATION LBA 40 'Tf1 I.zs TYP. fSSE MOTE 3j 8' I 1Z' 11' I 5 .5' i ?T 1 6.5 6.5' SHLDR. RAPT. - t 50D 1 a• 4" 4' 9' 4" I PRarrLE GRADE P014T 0.04 O.Qa 0�02 0.02 ] 2' CURB AND 6RrT€R TYPE r< TYPICAL SECTION 3 US 41 STA, 2602+89.48 TO STA- 1636+08.64 (EAS STA. 2602+89.48 TO STA- 1637+40.51 (WES Ar W CONSTRUCTION OPTIONAL BASF GROUP iO WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COUI?SE (TRAFFIC' i TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC D) (111i') AND FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (314") (PC7 76-. SHOULDER PAVEMENT ;ttyti4�1�H�l�rr, xti+` fJ'r�A, OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 7 WIFH 414x_�.V ff i e SP $TR1JCTl(fi,4t coURsE (TRAFFIC D) 4\GEAlo. AND FRICTION COARSE FC-5 (314") (PG 76-. SHARED USE PATH I OPTIONAL BASE GROOP 1 WITH 4'1 TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE(1") C? aOeA5 H. BUrg, F.F. P.E. Lrrer+se Naenbti 39155 Warrma GrGUp, W. 2203 N_ tars Avwr m. Swre MAV rafAR9. F+w fi 33607 GQrflefcare of An[Aorrzalron '36M6091 E 4 Page 682 of 745 8d Prfn6j3?e RMSIN6y ffrPJ r-�. RewftfErrd CRT Begley€nd CfPr Omit Bali A, 6 Ft R. 5(i. 4 !6 F{. R. 5fd. 9-4p'f' (Ste More 51 W-Beam R'-eeam W-Bear Ger+er0 Guwdral? Pane) Generaf Gvardrarr Panel 9 �¢"I i9 '.p Standard # 5tanitlard Standard PdSt S •r. AOSI & 4 Pesr 6 4 _ corset Brack if Orfiet Hrwk ■ y P O"sef RI a # v amp Min. Veaf Area l?mfti His [?@ar Area CfmlfS a31$ L _ - { i7'-0' g• a ` # Hen. Cloav ArCa L ' p 'q Rid9pary Pa-lr'J Splice fTyp.J i•'Y- a+�c ti 4 t'RF Po-st d'-3' SP. 4� s ?TFp.l ?5 Req�d.J _ _ L.E 'a Rvdspan PanpJ SpJrra eTyp.) RE i Y am s4 8 FOOT R.4DW5 g CRT Pas; Q 6'-Y So. A#$ CR7 SYSTEM farPlfFReRd.J _. PLANl i'v { Hidipav, Panel Sprife fiyJ1.J w !6 FOOT RADIL+S CRT raft a $c. CRT SYSTEM {.e irrp)raJaeQd.j PLAN VfEW Y Match Line Aarrfr line fCRT 5f5rem ?[AT 5Fofem PJan VUmj Plan view? Face of Face pf �. 6uardralr GoaMra�J $.q CRT * {RT L Pose � post �5 a 5 CfPr End ` N Trgprmenr CAT Cmd Fyw & BrgivJrEnd Treatment ti Gvardrarf 5ta. Assemb?r ?see Sheet 121 CONTINUING OPTION END TREATMENT OPTION CONNECTING DL7AIL� 24 FOOT 14ADiU CRT SYSTEM FLAN VfEW CRT SYSTEM SUMMARY TABLE - RETURN LEM137h OF OVANFeTY Of AREA ClE'AR 19ADiU5 SOP-REfNf CRT POSTS Pa Fl J •OF MAZARf)5 8 J25 5 25 : 15 16 250 6 34 r 15 ]1 37 5 F 44 r V 772 su6 rU SO x 20 !VOTES: r. JNSFALLAT?ON: Canstrarr trey Fpmefad fpWvp Ja"vt and Conn"Npq Jasta?l o-phon ex fhowra fn the plan$,. 2. Heft. CLE4R AREA: Keep the area behind me CRT free of fi-ed o0jects 30 abovegvouM lrarardi alrNm rN Rio. Cfear Awea hrwti Shower. IPainrajo a Slope W steeper (has J:20 for a minift)m } pehrnd {he pos(s, a0 nkainWo a Slope rw steeper (has 1:2 deYand d from Mm po-sts. 3. 4PPRDACH GRAVOKGr Rainialo gradJW on lbe Foadway ilde or the d0ardralr race ai a maxi-wm slope of ?:?0. 4. HAFEAfA1S: for [RF Pasts, vse TvmCer Past marenar rn arrardanee with SperiFrration A7. Use staeJ panels avid hardware vo accordant@ rvjeh 5pecificari6rt 967. 5. 617LT 004?55r4;v: For the 6 FWr RJd105 CRT SY51`6M 4•'Li, do net Price h ptineJ-r post mWM Mr of rhg Cfnter CAT N5,4 fpmit the 3V Burros -Head &urt onrr at the Joearion st"wAJ. 6, 5HOP-BEWr PM'FLS, Instal? Shofp-O" Aa•'re+fil r}hpfe rndlcated 0SJn9 2I-0V Gr 29-PV W-beam FaneJS SAOce at poSe rocatidnS WJ(hfn thu CRT radf4j5 uFfng rtw genpvar conbyurafvan of V 0 Sutton -Head Bolts f8 rNd. pyr spJ0r4;X 7. GEBERAl GUARDFIArlr Beperal OLaf0ra{frx0icafJy includes Pare?S and post Spacing as shorm on Steet 2,iPUUdinp parWfef and Tapered Spgwcpnrg. ApppprPdGh Tvdn$,Jrrons, aw-5 od Giiardrarl, Cr Redkk-fd POSt Spacing £OrvdraJf $,V"nr5, "V he SVDSfJrutPd For the GYner#? Guardrail shown hevan if inoixwed Jn the plans. LAST li DESCRePTION: Ev1SlOFr FY 2O2S-26 11101123 �.� STANDARD r?LA TYPICAL PAVEMENT DESIGNS FOR TURNLANE (55 mph and greater, divided highways) FC-5 Friction Course WIDENING 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 11 WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (2.0") TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) 9 Page 683 of 745 FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) SHOULDERS 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 1 WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) MILLING AND RESURFACING (Overlap Detail) MILL EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT (2.25" AVG. DEPTH) TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) TYPICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR DRIVEWAY WITH TURNLANE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 11 TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") FRICTION COURSE FC-12.5 (1.5")(TRAFFIC C) (PG 76-22) Safety information to help with crash data among other resources. Safety Engineering (fdot.gov) Pre -Application Meeting Minutes — Roadway Design (See FDM, Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications) The following roadway meeting minutes are based on the information provided at the Pre -Application Meeting and are written as if turn lanes will/may be constructed (or modified) in the State R/W. Specific requirements will be known once Access Management needs have been finalized. Design related guidance discussed during the meeting is subject to change based on new criteria, existing conditions, or District policy. The Roadway Meeting Minutes are general in nature and are intended to provide a starting point for the FOR to begin to familiarize themselves with design standards from the FDOT Design Manual (FDM), Flexible Pavement Design Manual (FPDM), Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), AASHTO (Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets), D1 Policy, Standard Plans, FAC Rule 14-96, and State Specifications. These online documents are constantly changing, and it is recommended the FOR review the updated Standards. FDOT Roadway Design is markedly different from local roads and sub -division street design. Pre-Apps are a cursory and non -binding meeting to give the Development Design Team, a brief on the expectations of the Permit submittal. Your Permit submittal will be compared to these online Standards and comments will be issued where your design does not meet the State Standards. Permit Plans with roadway design elements cannot be reviewed until all Access Management and Safety needs and concerns have been met/resolved. Roadway design cannot be completed until all Access Management and Safety Offices reviews, concerns, and needs are addressed in the OSP Permit Submittal. (The attached comments are to give the FOR the specific elements that will/may be required). It is the responsibility of the FOR to read, study, and understand the Plans Presentation, Design standards from the FDM (read/study FDM Chapters 201,210, 212, 214, 215, 222, 223, 224, 240, and the 900 series) and other applicable Standards in the Standard Plans. These documents are online and easy to access, and it is the EOR's responsibility to provide a design in the FDOT R/W, that meets the standards contained in these documents. (Tip: Read the entire chapter before making decisions). Page 684 of 745 The Applicant is strongly advised to review the current FDM, Standard Plans, and State Specifications prior to submitting Permit Construction Plans for review. Please note, turn lane lengths for DESIGN SPEEDS are minimums than may be increased based on -site specific circumstances and site conditions. All work within the FDOT R/W must meet criteria shown in the current FDOT Design Manual (FDM), FDOT Standard Plans, and FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Design values and design criteria from the FDM, which are not attained will require a Design Variation from the DISTRICT DESIGN ENGINEER (See FDM 122 Design Exceptions and Design Variations). Design values and design criteria from the AASHTO (Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets) which are not attained will require a Design Exception from the STATE ENGINEER. However, this is not preferred by FDOT and may not be approved. Please note to review all crash data prior to attaining any design variation to validate that you have no none associated crashes for the design variation that you may want to get approved. If there are known crashes for the variation it may not be approved. The Department is under no obligation to approve any Design Variation/Exception submitted for review. A R/W donation may be required to mitigate the design impacts such that the proposed development meets the FDOT's Standards. 1. Provide Plans in 11"x17" PDF format with the maximum scale 1" = 50'. (Please print a CHECK SET pdf with the "Actual" Option to check the Graphical Scales prior to Submittal). (Minimum text size = 0.06). 2. Provide notes for the governing Standard Plans, Specifications, and Florida Design Manual. Include location map and Index of Sheets. (See FDM 910 Key Sheet). Include all component plans into a single Permit Submittal. 3. Obtain/Develop Stationing (if available) for the State Baseline, side streets and, entrance/exits. (See FDM 915 Plan -Profiles). Baseline stationing can be obtained from FDOT Right of Way Maps available here: https://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/rowmap.shtm via interactive PDF or Google Earth. 4. Provide a Baseline Survey horizontal alignment stationing that meets FDM design standards within the State's R/W and includes the functional area of the intersection (See Figure 212.4.2 Functional Definition. Include Curve Geometry (if present), provide bearings, and station equations with names streets. Driveways will also show the horizontal alignment in the functional area just 50' back from the R/W, since this will affect the state roadway capacity and traffic. 5. (If Sidewalks required) Provide 1' graded area, on each side of the 5' sidewalk and inside the FDOT R/W, with cross slope grades no steeper than 1:6. Locate sidewalks as close to the R/W as possible, however only sidewalks outside of the roadway Clear Zone is allowed in New Construction. Back of Sidewalk Profiles required for new sidewalks not adjacent to curb and gutters. 6. See Chapter 226 Patterned Pavement and Architectural Pavers (if applicable). 7. High Speed (55 mph and greater, divided highways) (FC-5 Friction Course Notes — See current Flexible Pavement Design Manual (FPDM) Section 4.3) FC-5 is not to be placed in median crossovers, turn outs, or gore areas of multilane (if applicable). 8. Provide Station Equations for Entrance and side street intersections with Base Line (FDM 915). 9. Provide the street names for all local State, Federal, County, and municipal roadways. (FDM 915). Page 685 of 745 10. New Driveway — Show the dimensions (See Driveway Terminology FDM Fig. 214.1.1). (Include the distance from the edge of the travel lane to the 1St access point on the site; Throat distance). 11. Provide Audio Vibratory Treatment (AVT) or ground in rumble strips as shown in FDM 210.4.6 and Standard Plan 546-10 and 546-020. (Shall be used where there is no curb on the inside or outside). 12. Provide Pavement Cross Slopes as shown in FDM Fig. 211.2.1 Standard Pavement Cross Slopes. 13. Provide roadway profiles from the roadway Centerline to 50' or more beyond the R/W for all new roadway connections. Provide back of sidewalk profiles when not adjacent to curbs. 14. Provide cross sections at a 50' interval on even +50 Station roadway cross sections. Provide a cross section horizontal/vertical grids with labeling, exaggerated scales, and provide the existing and donated R/W with dimensions. (Proposed R/W is only when a donation is required). 15. The roadway construction in the State R/W will require a site specific TTC Plan that matches the complexity of the proposed construction and provides for safe passage of all Roadway users. (Policy; See Standard Plans 102- 600 SPI, FDM 240 and the attached link for additional information). TTCP for this proposed Permit construction will need scaled plan graphics with stationing, TTCP Typical Sections, lane closures, lane widths, taper lengths, buffer space, device spacing(s), advance warning signs and with all equipment and necessary personnel for safe construction in the State R/W. Standard Plans can be used as a reference to the scaled TTC plans sheets detailing the proposed construction. Any differing condition, restrictions, or deviation from the Standard Plans requires scaled plans and site -specific details. Standard Plans with Phasing note ONLY, are not sufficient for this construction. This site requires site specific details and scaled TTC Plans. (See F.A.C. 14-96.005(4)(d)9). Include measures for all Roadway Users during Construction in the State R/W (See Std. Plans 102-660 and 102-661). CENTRAL OFFICE UPDATES AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL (102-600 Series) https.11www. youtube.comlwotch?v=fAOC-BHVYAB 16. Comments issued in OSP for Roadway Design, will be directly related to FDOT online standards or District Policy. Please review any comment not understood or agreed, and compare to the standards in the FDM, Standard Plans, FPDM, MUTCD, AASHTO, and State Specifications rp for to requesting a meeting with the reviewer. Forward comment requests not understood after researching the topic in the FDOT online standards. These comments are not intended to be all inclusive of errors and omissions. It should not be assumed that any issues that are not addressed in these Meeting Minutes are acceptable to the Department. The consultant is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment and quality of their work. Sincerely, Dwayne Barnhill District Roadway Permits Coordinator Phone: (863)519-2276 Email: dwayne.barnhill@dot.state.fl.us -----Original Appointment ----- From: Cando, Jonathan <Jonathan.Cando@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2025 9:36 AM To: Cando, Jonathan; Deven Long; JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com; karim@blueprintpal.com; Weng, Randy; Nelson, Keri; Barnhill, Dwayne; James, Caitlyn; Swann, Rob; McCaughey, Erica; D1-Systems Planning Cc: Etheridge, Kristen; Carroll, Dennis; Carroll, Dennis Page 686 of 745 Subject: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management When: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Microsoft Teams Meeting Importance: High Also, please inform us the details for this permit project here: We're working on a PUD rezoning case in Collier County. Mike Sawyer from the County's growth management division recommended that we coordinate with FDOT regarding the proposed driveway connection on US 41 and provided your contact info. The rezoning will only be for 12 single-family units (daily trips less than 600). The current plans propose access at an existing directional median opening at US 41 / Trail Ridge Road. Link to Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps/@26.0579743,- 81.690248,358m/data=!3m1 ! 1 e3?entry=ttu&g_egTEgoyMD11 MDkxMC4wlKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D I have attached the TIS for the rezoning submittal for quick reference. We would like to schedule a pre -application meeting with FDOT to discuss the feasibility of the directional access and submittal requirements for permitting. Microsoft Teams Need help? Join the meeting Meeting ID: 273 170 680 676 7 Passcode: yM7tJ3FQ Dial in by phone +1 850-739-5589„72194907# United States, Tallahassee Find a local number Phone conference ID: 721 949 07# Join on a video conferencing device Tenant key: 11384774@t.plcm.vc Video ID: 111 727 700 0 More info For organizers: Meeting options Reset dial -in PIN O 9 Page 687 of 745 Information that is submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation is open for personal inspection and copying by any person in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Org help Privacy and security io Page 688 of 745 Deven Long From: Barnhill, Dwayne <Dwayne.Barnhill@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 11:29 AM To: Cando, Jonathan; Deven Long; Justin Ebrite; karim@blueprintpal.com; Weng, Randy; Nelson, Keri; James, Caitlyn; Swann, Rob; McCaughey, Erica; D1-Systems Planning Cc: Etheridge, Kristen; Carroll, Dennis; Carroll, Dennis Subject: RE: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management Attachments: Roadway Design Guidelines.pdf, 2023 Rule 14-96.doc External Email Warning Warning: Sender Dwayne. Barnhill@dot.state.fLus is not yet trusted by your organization. Please be careful before replying or clicking/downloading the attachment and URLs. Report Phishin Mark as Safe powered by Graphus° Please see attached standard guidelines and roadway checklist if your design changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. ***All pre -application meetings are non -binding. These meeting notes are not intended to be all-inclusive of errors and omissions. It should not be assumed that any issues that were not addressed are acceptable to the Department. The permittee or representative is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment, and the quality of their work. Provide Plans in 11"x17" PDF format with the maximum scale 1" = 50'. (Please print a CHECK SET pdf with the "Actual" Option to check the Graphical Scales prior to Submittal). (Minimum text size = 0.06) Specific Roadway Characteristics: Design speed: 55 FDM 210-lane widths (12' travel 12' auxillary) FDM 214- driveway follow driveway profile: Fdm 214.4.2 (curb and gutter) (if applicable) FDM 212-turnlane: 55mph 350' decel length with keyhole and 10' shoulders 5' paved (if applicable) FDM 215 roadway safety Clear Zone 30' travel 18' auxillary FDM 222 sidewalk Cntxt class C3C 6' required (existing sidewalks along frontage) Page 689 of 745 Driveway layout: Typical half Section For tow Fvpcef Half Smion For YOfumLl Rea,denUM Cmierflons Wgher Mume Conimcroora *.v-r fife' Une w POW Of Conner[JOn aS 9vawn )n 1hd PWS as 04rarmrn4d $Y f1w FnQir,�Rr. Ofain&ge Pipe fSre hdra i) TTTTTTTTZTj fromn 1, D;tr7rr l_� i - 111111 ��-tom Shoulder tine o €dpe of Travef way I I Frere Pprnr frp.) P.T. Iryp.J LAST 12: Hrv;ti;pr� � Drive MOM and M90e PLAN Shouotler Sad (See Opposite) Wji feh Nafiss, w ;.A Draerhw Pepe RTxk, Ouch � Mitered End Section (frA) f5ee lndea 430-022) DRAINAbrzzE 5ECtION 5 'f777 s JM � Roadway t,t[f, LOT 5fioufder 5' Min. fw Privpre Drirpw4ly 6' Mon. For 51de Quads RI W tone 11 11 - l shoulder time )0 Edge of Travel way Edge of TFerel I Paved Orlveway Apron fn Accordance with $)reef 2 a 2 ar &$ 5baffo in rho Flan.+._ 5flaufder Sod f5ee ondex 445-001) 4%, Roadway 5trou)der. DYirawdy Taper Or DriyeWdy Auxrfiary Ldnes Travef War Paved or &railed DrIVeway €xistirAff or Proposed Arl.e ?.6 5f d l.a Ppinr Of Cgnner[,pn DRIVEWAY PROHLE AND EArD VIEW FLU5J4 SHOULDER ROADWAY - DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION FY 2024-25 } STANDARD PLANS 4 Page 690 of 745 Typical Section As -built in the area: EXIST. IVW EXISTING rANJAMI CANAL * 5MAf-L BE $rA811I2ED WTH cork. DIrCU PINT ' CONC. D)TCH PAVT. NAroiRA! GROUND { d � CONC. VARAIER WALL . (5tE IJ&%Ahj TRAFFIC DATA CVJIREh'r Y�AA = 2024 awl - 24.100 ESTIMATED OP€J1fNG YEAR - 2016 AaOT = 14,200 ESTIMATED DESIGN YEAR = 2036 AAOT - 59.709 fi = 11.1% D = 54.7% r - 13.4% (24 HOVF?j DESIGN HOUR T - 6.7% DESIGN SPEED = 55 MPH afvjS0OvS DA FE �UMOT5 �OFOAA�WrYWA�U TE 4127115 REVfS€ 774' STANDARD _C.LEAPING AND GRUBE 6 j, I to+usT. i " "I, i4' 3� S' I2' 12 s.s ��• 6.5 2975' 6.5' SHLOR. PAVT.SOD i SOD 5;gf]R_ PAVr. I VAAIfS I . 1 S4Yf; q• T� �r PROFILE 6r�aVE T POINT 0.04 0.04 } � y+pRl 0.06 U.02 D 2 0 2 P.fJ2 rrPE 8 CURB AND OMER $TASIUZATIM TYPE F LRA 40 .25' TYP. NOTE 31 TYPICAL SECTION 3 US 4P STA. 26024-89-48 TO STA_ 1636+08.64 (EAS STA. P 602+89.48 TO STA. 1637+40.51 (WES NEW CONSTRUCTION OPTIONAL BA5E GROUP 10 WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC i TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COUP-5E (TRAFFIC 0) 0 J12") ( ,AND FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (314") (PG 76-. SHOULDER PAVEMENT ttstiuwki�[Ifrr,fr+,� OPTIONAL BASE GROUP P WITH " '.v SR STRUCTURAL CO�lf�SE (TRAFFIC D) (7i1z') { ti C:r.•'' \GEN:. AND FRICTION COURSE FC- (3/4°) (G i o: SHARED USE PArm OPTIONA(, BASE GROUP 1 WITH f9 "4; TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (10) 8 i5 l 10 1, Dmpfae B. BUF9. Y.F. F-E. tecems9 mf+nbe 39155 W"-- GroUp, Inc, 2203 N- CbfS Ay+gr . IGWta J4200 rarnpa, F2P'JJ- 33607 fgnlHratr of 4.[hor1zarrcn 00666091 4 Page 691 of 745 Guardrail Design Option Prinripfe (TFW r--_ gPgJnlEM CRT &!71rV€n1 CiPT Omif Botf g_q4 6 F2 R. $fd. y-fir t6 F{. R. 5f,, g_¢yf• (Ste More 5) W-beam N'-aeam R'-Beau f aner Gerer0 Ouvora'J nane� £irnr•ar G�,a��rr,t,�I raneJ oast I OfP3e[ 6farR q!Ain. orrset BroCk 17"Sef elp� ri Vedr Area l2mf{s ar Ared [MrSaIC$CrfaFArta LRa-lel Soiu rTyO.J ar� 0 0 cfrr Punt 9 a -3' Sp. dirk u.� f ep) l`5 RePd,1 r . - _ 'rD lYadspgn Panel 5pJka fTypj s° 8 FOOT 17,�Z}��1$ 5 CRT Pasta 6'-3' Sf. 2w tin CRT SYSTEM � � iJ FP } r6 Jxud.J - - — PLAN VIEW rndspaFi parter 50rrreCryj).J { �G FOOT RADIOS° [JTF Poet @ a'-� $p. CRT SYSTEM .= Jr rrra.2 ra ReQ6..1 PLAN VfEW Y iAatcn Cine Marra Lrne fCRr BYsrem iCRT 5porem Plan V1mj Plan View) Fa{e 4f Face of . 5uardra+r 6uardrai+ r � 9 a L Post post 536 a 5 CiPT EmY N Trgarn" 021 End haw e. 6rgirJrEnd Treafinenf ti Guardrarf 5fa.,�6sen,pfF e5ee sheet !JJ CONTi✓JUING OPTION! END TREATMENT OPTION lCOArNCCTING DFTAIL� ?4 FOOT it.4L7iU CRT SYSTEM PLAN VfEW RfTURM idMGT.4 Of OVAMTrTY Of AMA CLEAR RADA U5 5M4P,W:Nf CRT P05T5 OF MAZARd5 fFr J PAfdFLlSJ fFT.J 'V x W' fEr.) F Ji5 5 25 15 16 250 6 34 r 15 -. 375 9 4Q r ZV .d1 3ULr ru SO x 20 NOTES: r. JNSTALLATWN: [an#tram the Fpc jffad rndlvF Ja"vt and Conn"Ong Jls2afl Wion ex showra in the plans. 2. HfN. {,GEAR AREA: Kee0 [he area b0ind IN CRT free of fi-ed o8}ects arnd alovepyouod irarards whNp rN Wit. Cfear Awea hrwts Shpwn. P0entmo a slue W Steeper (han J:20 rpr a minift)m 2' pehJnd {he pos(S, aM maintain a SlpAe rapt Steeper (ha7 1:2 de9pnd d from rhr punts. 3. 4PPRDACH SRADMG. RaintaJo gradJW on Me roadway side or the gowdralf Pace a[ a maximum slope of Ha. 4. HArVrrALS: for CRr Pasts, vsu TamCer Past ma[enar rn arrardanee with SperiFrrafion W. use 52aeJ panels avail hardNare jo aeeordante wi[h Specificariort 967. S. 9OLT Qkf55r4?rr: For the 6 Fp4t R. diWB GRr SyStem o� Jy. Co np,t PraCe .t pane)-tc pPSC mwnt Wr of rho cerger CRT NF? f9mft the Ter Sutton -Head &oft on,r at the Joeation 5t"wAA S, SHOP -GENT PANELS. fnstaff ShpP-Beat Aa•' Usl Nhere 2ndJrat4d NSJng 2I-47 or 29-PV W-Beam Panels 5p0ce at pOSe 2PCa1i4nS WJ(hffi the CJrr radfaS upfng the Genprof cXdJgurafjan of %' 0 Buffan-Mo-ad Bolts fH rNd. pyr spur4pX 7. GENERA! WARDRAfl: Cewje GvarOl Of rypl cafly includes f &Aer5 aril past 5pxing a5 sfortn on Sheet 2, JKoLrolnp aarWfef and tapered Spgrnpntg. Apppprpa{h TranSJr2po5. Uw,5Wed Cie.Rfdrjlfl, Cr rIeGUC4d PpSt 5paCinq �GardraJf ¢pgn*nfr may he 506NhAtpQ Jpr the Fenerjif Guar�raiJ shrawn hrran if rnrlicatrd Ju Mm plans. 2ASr DESCRfPTJON: [+JSlON w FY 2025-,?G RE ti1151CW FACE STANDARD PLANS 5 Page 692 of 745 TYPICAL PAVEMENT DESIGNS FOR TURNLANE (55 mph and greater, divided highways) FC-5 Friction Course WIDENING 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 11 WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (2.0") TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) SHOULDERS 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 1 WITH TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) MILLING AND RESURFACING (Overlap Detail) MILL EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT (2.25" AVG. DEPTH) TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") (PG 76-22) FRICTION COURSE FC-5 (3/4") (PG 76-22) TYPICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR DRIVEWAY WITH TURNLANE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 12" STABILIZATION (LBR 40) OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 11 TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TRAFFIC C) (1.5") FRICTION COURSE FC-12.5 (1.5")(TRAFFIC C) (PG 76-22) 6 Page 693 of 745 Safety information to help with crash data among other resources. Safety Engineering (fdot.gov) Pre -Application Meeting Minutes — Roadway Design (See FDM, Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications) The following roadway meeting minutes are based on the information provided at the Pre -Application Meeting and are written as if turn lanes will/may be constructed (or modified) in the State R/W. Specific requirements will be known once Access Management needs have been finalized. Design related guidance discussed during the meeting is subject to change based on new criteria, existing conditions, or District policy. The Roadway Meeting Minutes are general in nature and are intended to provide a starting point for the FOR to begin to familiarize themselves with design standards from the FDOT Design Manual (FDM), Flexible Pavement Design Manual (FPDM), Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), AASHTO (Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets), D1 Policy, Standard Plans, FAC Rule 14-96, and State Specifications. These online documents are constantly changing, and it is recommended the FOR review the updated Standards. FDOT Roadway Design is markedly different from local roads and sub -division street design. Pre-Apps are a cursory and non -binding meeting to give the Development Design Team, a brief on the expectations of the Permit submittal. Your Permit submittal will be compared to these online Standards and comments will be issued where your design does not meet the State Standards. Permit Plans with roadway design elements cannot be reviewed until all Access Management and Safety needs and concerns have been met/resolved. Roadway design cannot be completed until all Access Management and Safety Offices reviews, concerns, and needs are addressed in the OSP Permit Submittal. (The attached comments are to give the FOR the specific elements that will/may be required). It is the responsibility of the FOR to read, study, and understand the Plans Presentation, Design standards from the FDM (read/study FDM Chapters 201,210, 212, 214, 215, 222, 223, 224, 240, and the 900 series) and other applicable Standards in the Standard Plans. These documents are online and easy to access, and it is the EOR's responsibility to provide a design in the FDOT R/W, that meets the standards contained in these documents. (Tip: Read the entire chapter before making decisions). Page 694 of 745 The Applicant is strongly advised to review the current FDM, Standard Plans, and State Specifications prior to submitting Permit Construction Plans for review. Please note, turn lane lengths for DESIGN SPEEDS are minimums than may be increased based on -site specific circumstances and site conditions. All work within the FDOT R/W must meet criteria shown in the current FDOT Design Manual (FDM), FDOT Standard Plans, and FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Design values and design criteria from the FDM, which are not attained will require a Design Variation from the DISTRICT DESIGN ENGINEER (See FDM 122 Design Exceptions and Design Variations). Design values and design criteria from the AASHTO (Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets) which are not attained will require a Design Exception from the STATE ENGINEER. However, this is not preferred by FDOT and may not be approved. Please note to review all crash data prior to attaining any design variation to validate that you have no none associated crashes for the design variation that you may want to get approved. If there are known crashes for the variation it may not be approved. The Department is under no obligation to approve any Design Variation/Exception submitted for review. A R/W donation may be required to mitigate the design impacts such that the proposed development meets the FDOT's Standards. 1. Provide Plans in 11"x17" PDF format with the maximum scale 1" = 50'. (Please print a CHECK SET pdf with the "Actual" Option to check the Graphical Scales prior to Submittal). (Minimum text size = 0.06). 2. Provide notes for the governing Standard Plans, Specifications, and Florida Design Manual. Include location map and Index of Sheets. (See FDM 910 Key Sheet). Include all component plans into a single Permit Submittal. 3. Obtain/Develop Stationing (if available) for the State Baseline, side streets and, entrance/exits. (See FDM 915 Plan -Profiles). • Baseline stationing can be obtained from FDOT Right of Way Maps available here: https://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/rowmap.shtm via interactive PDF or Google Earth. 4. Provide a Baseline Survey horizontal alignment stationing that meets FDM design standards within the State's R/W and includes the functional area of the intersection (See Figure 212.4.2 Functional Definition. Include Curve Geometry (if present), provide bearings, and station equations with names streets. Driveways will also show the horizontal alignment in the functional area just 50' back from the R/W, since this will affect the state roadway capacity and traffic. 5. (If Sidewalks required) Provide 1' graded area, on each side of the 5' sidewalk and inside the FDOT R/W, with cross slope grades no steeper than 1:6. Locate sidewalks as close to the R/W as possible, however only sidewalks Page 695 of 745 outside of the roadway Clear Zone is allowed in New Construction. Back of Sidewalk Profiles required for new sidewalks not adjacent to curb and gutters. 6. See Chapter 226 Patterned Pavement and Architectural Pavers (if applicable). 7. High Speed (55 mph and greater, divided highways) (FC-5 Friction Course Notes — See current Flexible Pavement Design Manual (FPDM) Section 4.3) FC-5 is not to be placed in median crossovers, turn outs, or gore areas of multilane (if applicable). 8. Provide Station Equations for Entrance and side street intersections with Base Line (FDM 915). 9. Provide the street names for all local State, Federal, County, and municipal roadways. (FDM 915). 10. New Driveway — Show the dimensions (See Driveway Terminology FDM Fig. 214.1.1). (Include the distance from the edge of the travel lane to the 1st access point on the site; Throat distance). 1 1 . Provide Audio Vibratory Treatment (AVT) or ground in rumble strips as shown in FDM 210.4.6 and Standard Plan 546-10 and 546-020. (Shall be used where there is no curb on the inside or outside). 12. Provide Pavement Cross Slopes as shown in FDM Fig. 211.2.1 Standard Pavement Cross Slopes 13. Provide roadway profiles from the roadway Centerline to 50' or more beyond the R/W for all new roadway connections. Provide back of sidewalk profiles when not adjacent to curbs. 14. Provide cross sections at a 50' interval on even +50 Station roadway cross sections. Provide a cross section horizontal/vertical grids with labeling, exaggerated scales, and provide the existing and donated R/W with dimensions. (Proposed R/W is only when a donation is required). 15. The roadway construction in the State R/W will require a site specific TTC Plan that matches the complexity of the proposed construction and provides for safe passage of all Roadway users. (Policy; See Standard Plans 102- 600 SPI, FDM 240 and the attached link for additional information). TTCP for this proposed Permit construction Page 696 of 745 will need scaled plan graphics with stationing, TTCP Typical Sections, lane closures, lane widths, taper lengths, buffer space, device spacing(s), advance warning signs and with all equipment and necessary personnel for safe construction in the State R/W. Standard Plans can be used as a reference to the scaled TTC plans sheets detailing the proposed construction. Any differing condition, restrictions, or deviation from the Standard Plans requires scaled plans and site -specific details. Standard Plans with Phasing note ONLY, are not sufficient for this construction. This site requires site specific details and scaled TTC Plans. (See F.A.C. 14-96.005(4)(d)9). Include measures for all Roadway Users during Construction in the State R/W (See Std. Plans 102-660 and 102-661). CENTRAL OFFICE UPDATES AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL (102-600 Series) https.11www. youtube. comlwotch ?v=fAOC-BHVYAB 16. Comments issued in OSP for Roadway Design, will be directly related to FDOT online standards or District Policy. Please review any comment not understood or agreed, and compare to the standards in the FDM, Standard Plans, FPDM, MUTCD, AASHTO, and State Specifications rp for to requesting a meeting with the reviewer. Forward comment requests not understood after researching the topic in the FDOT online standards. These comments are not intended to be all inclusive of errors and omissions. It should not be assumed that any issues that are not addressed in these Meeting Minutes are acceptable to the Department. The consultant is solely responsible for technical accuracy, engineering judgment and quality of their work. Sincerely, Dwayne Barnhill District Roadway Permits Coordinator Phone: (863)519-2276 Email: dwayne.barnhill@dot.state.fl.us -----Original Appointment ----- From: Cando, Jonathan <Jonathan.Cando@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2025 9:36 AM To: Cando, Jonathan; Deven Long; JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com; karim@blueprintpal.com; Weng, Randy; Nelson, Keri; Barnhill, Dwayne; James, Caitlyn; Swann, Rob; McCaughey, Erica; D1-Systems Planning Cc: Etheridge, Kristen; Carroll, Dennis; Carroll, Dennis Subject: Eaglecrest RPUD - Access Management 10 Page 697 of 745 When: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Microsoft Teams Meeting Importance: High Also, please inform us the details for this permit project here: We're working on a PUD rezoning case in Collier County. Mike Sawyer from the County's growth management division recommended that we coordinate with FDOT regarding the proposed driveway connection on US 41 and provided your contact info. The rezoning will only be for 12 single-family units (daily trips less than 600). The current plans propose access at an existing directional median opening at US 41 / Trail Ridge Road. Link to Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps�ab26.0579743,- 81.690248,358m/data=!3m1 !1 e3?entry=ttu&g_epTEgoyMD11 MDkxMC4wlKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D I have attached the TIS for the rezoning submittal for quick reference. We would like to schedule a pre -application meeting with FDOT to discuss the feasibility of the directional access and submittal requirements for permitting. Microsoft Teams Need help? Join the meeting Meeting ID: 273 170 680 676 7 Passcode: yM7tJ3FQ Dial in by phone +1 850-739-5589„72194907# United States, Tallahassee 11 Page 698 of 745 Find a local number Phone conference ID: 721 949 07# Join on a video conferencing device Tenant key: 11384774@t.plcm.vc Video ID: 111 727 700 0 More info For organizers: Meeting options I Reset dial -in PIN Information that is submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation is open for personal inspection and copying by any person in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Org help Privacy and security 12 Page 699 of 745 Appendix F 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet Page 700 of 745 1 2 3 4 5 6 In# CIE# P-W Road# Link From 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 28 29 30 31 32 33 Peak 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2.0 % Hour Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak 2023 2008 Minimum Pk Dir Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour 2024 2024 Auto wl AGR or Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Avg % chg Abs Calculated Manual Manual To Road Sta. Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Vnlnme Volume Vnlnme Volume Vnlnme Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume 334 % Charms CAGR Override Override 1.0 99910 CR31 AirportRoad Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 4D 554 D N 2,200 1,449 1,423 1,309 1,252 1,247 1,310 1,240 1160 1230 1240 1220 1190 1690 1540 1480 1120 1,150 2.61% 30 -1.43% 0.00% 2.00% 2.1 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 6D 599 E N 3,000 1,860 1,814 1,831 1,746 1,857 1,910 1,980 2060 1950 1970 1810 2290 2330 2100 2250 2190 2,200 0.45% 10 1.05% 0.00% 2.00% 2.2 55 62031 CR31 Airport Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Rd. 6D 503 E S 3,000 2,036 1,900 1,734 1,809 1,709 1,790 1,770 1860 1830 1860 1770 2010 2230 2060 2160 2270 2,330 2.58% 60 0.85% 0.00% 2.00% 3.0 39 60121 CR31 Airport Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 502 E N 3,000 1,757 1,687 1,738 1,588 1,619 1,750 1,760 1740 1770 1980 2330 2240 2230 2000 2180 2150 2,180 1.38% 30 1.36% 0.00% 2.00% 4.0 99906 CR31 Airport Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 533 E N 2,800 2,045 2,159 1,923 2,017 1,976 2,150 2,190 2120 2060 2290 2310 2190 2200 2210 2210 2090 2,280 8.33% 190 0.68% 0.00% 2.00% 5.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 553 E N 2,800 2,258 2,164 1,776 2,138 1,828 1,890 1,920 2000 2040 2100 2230 2010 2170 2130 2080 2080 2,360 11.86% 280 0.28% 0.00% 2.00% 6.0 3 66031 CR31 Airport Road Davis Boulevard US 41 6D 552 E N 2,700 1,818 1,562 1,412 1,473 1,474 1,520 1,540 1610 1590 1610 1650 1600 1650 1560 1550 1470 1,720 14.53% 250 -0.35% 0.00% 2.00% 7.0 1 999111 Bayshore Drive Tamiami Trail Thomasson Drive 4D 521 D I S 1 1,800 6611 569 614 5511 510 5301 590 6101 600 6501 620 640 6601 490 7301 730 820 10.98%1 90 1.36%1 0.00% 2.00% 8.0 311 600211 CR 865 Bonita Beach Road West of Vanderbilt Dr. 4D 653 D E 1,900 1,355 937 1,392 1,014 984 9901 1,030 1010 1050 1070 1060 1050 1080 1070 1100 1000 1,110 9.91% 110 -1.24% 0.00% 2.00% 9.0 Carson Road Lake Trafford Road Immokalee Drive 2U 610 D N 600 263 251 251 262 289 280 290 300 310 320 330 300 290 340 290 290 290 0.00% 0 0.61% 0.00% 2.00% 10.0 33 60101 County Barn Road Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2U 519 D S 900 666 584 754 407 285 280 290 310 320 326.4 380 380 480 330 370 380 370 -2.70% -10 -3.61% 0.00% 2.00% 11.0 99912 CR29 CR 29 Tamiami Trail Chokoloskee Island 2U 582A D S 1,000 145 141 141 151 154 120 160 180 100 190 160 160 160 140 180 180 160 -12.50% -20 0.62% 0.00% 2.00% 12.0 SR84 Davis Boulevard Tamiami Trail Airport Road 6D 558 E E 2,700 1,691 1,614 1,530 1,331 1,409 1,400 1,380 1480 1520 1550 1610 1420 1440 1410 1410 1420 1,590 10.69% 170 -0.38% 0.00% 2.00% 13.0 48 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Airport Road Lakewood Boulevard 4D 559 D E 2,000 1,641 1,642 1,470 1,431 1,413 1,440 1,380 1520 1550 1500 1580 1330 1440 1460 1470 1460 1,530 4.58% 70 -0.44% 0.00% 2.00% 14.0 49 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard Lakewood Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 658 1 D E 2,0001 1,641 1,6421 1,470 1,471 1,490 1,420 1,400 1550 1530 1610 1670 1550 1500 1580 1630 1660 1,690 1.78% 30 0.18% 0.00% 2.00% 15.0 83 60161 SR84 Davis Boulevard County Barn Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 538 D E 2,200 1,616 1,468 1,4821 1,386 1,374 1,310 1,2701 1360 1460 1440 1460 14101 1420 1360 1410 1500 1,550 3.23% 50 -0.26% 0.00% 2.00% 16.1 831 1 SR84 Davis Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Rd. 2U 560 E E 3,300 863 742 665 648 627 627 627 640 650 700 740 740 810 770 840 860 900 4.44% 40 0.26% 0.00% 2.00% 16.2 83 SR84 Davis Boulevard Radio Rd. Collier Boulevard 4U 601 E E 3,300 1,184 1,113 998 1,073 1,011 1,011 910 1020 1050 1080 1120 1190 1290 1430 1250 1220 1,240 1.61% 20 0.29% 0.00% 2.00% 17.0 62 63041 CR876 Golden Gate Boulevard Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 4D 531 D E 2,300 1,693 1,551 1,517 1,507 1,564 1,550 1,610 1600 1660 1600 1710 1730 1910 1990 1960 2030 2,300 11.74% 270 1.93% 0.00% 2.00% 18.0 99913 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 530 E E 2,700 1,151 1,018 987 991 975 1,070 1,150 1160 1210 1230 1230 1230 1560 1640 1630 1790 2,020 11.39% 230 3.58% 0.00% 3.58% 19.0 5 60027C CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Airport Road 6D 507 E E 3,550 2,447 2,295 3,157 2,442 2,422 2,590 2,500 2740 2780 2710 2930 2860 2990 2720 2770 3010 3,170 5.05% 160 1.63% 0.00% 2.00% 20.1 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road Livingston Rd. 6D 508 E E 3,550 2,093 2,298 2,409 2,376 2,350 2,410 2,340 2230 2280 2200 2290 2680 2950 3030 3140 3240 3,300 1.82% 60 2.89% 0.00% 2.89% 20.2 74 60006 CR886 Golden Gate Pwky Livingston Rd. 1-75 6D 691 E E 1 3,550 2,517 2,468 2,657 2,405 2,683 2,600 2,630 2820 2890 2770 2610 3020 3350 3210 3340 3370 3,550 5.07 % 180 2.17% 0.00% 2.17% 21.0 74 60027 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway I-75 Santa Barbara Boulevard 6D 509 E E 3,300 2,084 1,9291 1,937 1,711 2,021 2,090 1,9501 1900 1980 1960 2140 2400 2240 1920 2020 2270 2,350 3.40% 80 0.75% 0.00% 2.00% 22.0 1 99916 CR886 Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 605 D E 1,980 1,603 1,600 1,388 1,301 1,390 1,510 1,5001 1470 1450 1550 1610 1670 1730 1690 1450 1520 1,650 7.88% 130 0.18% 0.00% 2.00% 23.0 19 68041 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 594 D N 1,000 708 675 722 711 686 700 750 810 860 930 820 820 910 800 720 700 690 -1.45% -10 -0.16% 0.00% 2.00% 24.1 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Orange Blossom Dr. 4D 595 E N 2,400 1,520 1,415 1,481 1,473 1,512 1,370 1,410 1370 1340 1350 1370 1380 1490 1290 1390 1410 1,420 0.70% 10 -0.42% 0.00% 2.00% 24.2 65 60134 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Orange Blossom Dr. Pine Ridge Road 6D 581 E N 2,400 1,520 1,415 1,481 1,473 1,512 1,570 1,630 1530 1530 1550 1680 1560 1650 1490 1620 1630 1,610 -1.24% -20 0.36% 0.00% 2.00% 25.0 88 60005 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 505 E N 3,000 1,690 1,685 1,728 2,082 1,736 1,760 1,970 1930 1850 1890 2220 1960 1970 1760 1860 1880 1,940 3.09% 60 0.87% 0.00% 2.00% 26.0 99917 CR851 Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway Tamiami Trail 6D 504 E N 2,700 2,087 2,015 1,894 1,872 1,790 1,900 1,860 2140 2250 2190 2480 1960 2680 2510 2660 27601 2,990 7.69% 230 2.27% 0.00% 2.27% 27.0 87 68055 Green Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 2U 642 1 D E 1 9001 659 570 7071 581 587 610 650 660 7201 730 680 710 750 700 680 750 820 8.54 % 70 1.38% 0.00% 2.00% 29.0 66011 Gulfshore Drive l 11th Avenue Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 583a D N 800 205 244 244 210 236 150 230 220 230 234.6 220 300 310 220 220 220 220 0.00% 0 0.44% 0.00°o 2.00% 30.1 371 65061 CR951 Collier Boulevard Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 6D 655 E N 3,000 1,120 1,100 1,100 1,321 1,285 1,490 1,440 1480 1450 1520 1680 1850 1880 1830 1810 1870 2,050 8.78% 180 3.85% 0.00% 3.85% 30.2 37 65061 CR951 Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Golden Gate Boulevard 6D 584 E N 3,000 1,822 1,817 1,824 1,581 1,515 1,070 1,130 1120 1200 1220 1220 1260 1360 1400 1490 1580 1,760 10.23% 180 -0.22% 0.00% 2.00% 31.1 85 68056 CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Boulevard Pine Ridge Road 6D 536 E N 3,000 1,884 1,817 1,824 1,710 1,717 1,800 1,810 1830 1866.6 1903.932 1780 1850 1990 2340 2590 2530 2,750 8.00% 220 2.39% 0.00% 2.39% 31.2 85 68056 CR951 Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green 6D 536 E N 3,000 1,884 1,817 1,824 1,710 1,717 1,800 1,810 1830 1866.6 1903.932 1780 1850 1990 2340 2590 2530 2,750 8.00% 220 2.39% 0.00% 2.39% 32.1 76 65062 CR951 Collier Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky 4D 525 D N 2,300 1,444 1,550 1,458 1,468 1,368 1,250 1,290 1380 1370 1410 1500 1360 1730 1420 1410 1470 1,570 6.37% 100 0.52% 0.00% 2.00% 32.2 76 68056B CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Pwky Golden Gate Main Canal 4D 607 D N 2,300 1,384 1,3131 1,212 1,2481 1,278 1,1301 1,260 12501 1250 12601 1370 1360 1860 1800 17801 1980 1,920 -3.13% -60 2.07% 0.00% 2.07% 32.3 76 68056B CR951 Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Main Canal 1-75 8D 607 E N 1 3,600 1,384 1,313 1,212 1,248 1,278 1,130 1,260 1250 1250 1260 1370 1360 1860 1800 1780 1980 1,920 -3.13% -60 2.07% 0.00% 2.07% 33.0 61 60092 SR951 Collier Boulevard 1-75 Davis Boulevard 4D 573 E N 3,600 2,483 2,252 2,120 2,193 2,016 2,016 2,016 2480 2810 2820 2960 3020 3560 2260 3170 3020 3,260 7.36% 240 1.72% 0.00% 2.00% 34.0 86 1 60001 1 CR951 Collier Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 602 E N 3,000 1,894 1,894 1,894 1,374 1,420 1,490 1,590 1600 1490 1400 1660 1940 2130 2130 2270 2120 2,500 15.20% 380 1.75% 0.00% 2.00% 35.0 86 60001 CR951 Collier Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road Tamiami Trail 6D 603 E N 3,200 1,658 1,658 1,569 1,413 1,321 1,420 1,440 1620 1770 1860 1900 2000 2060 2050 2230 2250 2,140 -5.14% -110 1.61% 0.00% 2.00% 36.1 12 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Tamiami Trail Wal-Mart Driveway 6D 557 E N 2,500 1,744 1,489 1,489 1,696 1,652 1,820 2,010 1550 1581 1500 1530 1540 2150 2230 2420 2310 2,400 3.75% 90 2.02% 0.00% 2.02% 36.2 SR951 Collier Boulevard Wal-Mart Driveway Manatee Rd. 4D 557 D N 2,000 1,547 1,560 1,560 1,793 1,277 1,500 1,670 1550 1734 1768.68 1530 1540 1920 2230 2420 2310 2,400 3.75% 90 2.78% 0.00% 2.78% 37.0 12 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Manatee Road Mainsail Dr 4D 627 D S 2,200 1,384 1,392 1,392 1,173 1,187 1,340 1,390 1430 1560 1670 1770 1680 1690 1730 1810 1830 1,840 0.54% 10 1.80% 0.00% 2.00% 38.0 51 64041 SR951 Collier Boulevard Mainsail Dr Marco Island Bridge 4D 627 D N 2,200 1,384 1,276 1,276 1,173 1,187 1,340 1,390 1430 1560 1670 1770 1680 1690 1730 1810 1830 1,840 0.54% 10 1.80% 0.00% 2.00% 39.0 64 99901 CR846 111th Avenue N. Gulfshore Drive Vanderbilt Drive 2U 585 D E 700 251 254 274 302 261 240 240 270 300 300 306 312 290 320 390 330 310 -6.45% -20 1.33% 0.00% 2.00% 40.0 1 60031 CR846 111th Avenue N. Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 613 D E 900 380 348 348 360 376 380 380 430 430 430 439 448 560 580 700 610 630 3.17% 20 3.21% 0.00% 3.21% 41.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Rd. 6D 566 E W 3,100 1,538 1,632 1,632 1,936 1,612 1,850 1,960 1920 1910 2010 2080 2110 2220 1960 2070 1990 2,040 2.45% 50 1.78% 0.00% 2.00% 41.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 6D 625 E E 3,100 1,865 2,104 2,104 2,166 2,153 2,390 2,510 2330 2520 2570 2630 2650 2760 2110 2410 2690 2,620 -2.67% -70 2.15% 0.00% 2.15% 42.1 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 6D 567 E E 3,100 2,773 2,411 2,411 2,349 2,557 2,740 2,810 2860 2790 2790 2900 2780 2360 2100 2820 2830 2,930 3.41% 100 0.34% 0.00% 2.00% 42.2 6 66042 CR846 Immokalee Road Livingston Rd. 1-75 6D 679 E E 3,500 2,773 2,773 2,773 2,461 1,940 2,240 2,630 2560 2460 2460 2580 2550 3020 3110 3160 3020 3,140 3.82% 120 0.78% 0.00% 2.00% 43.1 8 66045 CR846 Immokalee Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 701 E E 3,5001 1,800 1,788 1,7881 1,858 1,6471 1,750 2,3001 2140 2410 2458.2 2360 2620 2320 2480 2590 3,470 25.36% 880 4.00% 4.00% 43.2 CR846 Immokalee Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 656 E E 3,200 1,399 1,650 1,590 1,858 1,647 1,750 1,830 1960 1960 1980:2NO20 1930 2030 2280 2640 2870 3,030 5.28% 160 4.00% 4.00% 44.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 1,401 1,613 1,613 1,406 1,451 1,620 1,640 1650 1620 1620 2050 2480 2710 2540 2600 3,040 14.47% 440 4.00% 4.00% 45.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 1,597 1,549 1,549 1,322 1,443 1,640 1,650 1810 1830 1890 2460 2310 2200 2020 2370 2,560 7.42% 190 2.99% 0.00% 2.994o 46.0 73 60165 CR846 Immokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 262 277 318 249 245 250 260 320 370 390 460 480 510 510 580 600 3.33% 204.00%4.00%470 66 99903 Lake Trafford Road West of SR 29 SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 367 362 362 396 396 410 430 460 470 470 460 500 480 490 480 500 4.00% 20 1.95% 0.00% 2.00% 60166 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 571 603 606 512 523 570 570 530 610 710 640 620 590 620 5901 550 -7.27% 40 -0.23% 0.00% 2.00% Page 701 of 745 Peak 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2.0 % Hour Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak 2023 2008 Minimum Pk Dir Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour 2024 2024 Auto w/ AGR or Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Avg % chg Abs Calculated Manual Manual iD# CIF# Proi# Rnad# Link From To Rnad Sta. Std Dir Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Vnlnme Volume Vnlnme 334 % Chanve CAGR Override Override 49.0 22 68051 Logan Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1,141 1,066 1,100 1,163 1,198 1,280 1,390 1350 1410 1570 1610 1500 1530 1490 1520 1550 1,430 -8.39% -120 1.42% 0.00% 2.00% 50.0 79 60166 Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Immokalee Rd. 2U 644 D N 1,000 355 379 603 422 420 430 410 470 590 560 570 600 670 650 670 760 770 1.30% 10 4.00% 4.00% 51.0 21 65041 CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street Immokalee Road 6/41) 673 D N 3,000 1,039 1,098 1,103 1,074 1,095 1,240 1,240 1170 1160 1180 1260 1230 1410 1770 1820 1600 1,570 -1.91% -30 2.61% 0.00% 2.61% 52.0 57 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1,551 1,443 1,882 1,667 1,511 1,590 1,670 1620 1610 1610 1640 1800 2220 1750 2000 1740 2,100 17.14% 360 1.91% 0.00% 2.00% 53.0 58 62071 CR881 Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ridge Road 6D 575 E N 3,100 1,300 1,246 1,402 1,090 1,335 1,430 1,500 1480 1450 1480 1490 1500 1560 1490 1530 1630 1,560 -4.49% -70 1.15% 0.00% 2.60% 54.0 52 60071 CR881 Livingston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway 6D 690 E N 3,100 1,351 1,432 1,361 1,323 1,787 1,510 1,400 1440 1470 1470 1530 1490 1330 1330 1360 1470 1,390 -5.76% -80 0.18% 0.00% 2.00% 55.0 53 60061 CR881 Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 1,742 1,323 1,067 1,067 1,156 1,130 1,210 1220 1220 1270 1330 1490 1820 1680 1700 1760 1,780 1.12% 20 0.13% 0.00% 2.00% 58.0 67 99904 N. 1st Street New Market Road Main Street 2U 590 D N 1 900 457 431 397 364 453 420 450 540 550 590 630 680 650 620 680 660 720 8.33% 60 2.88% 0.00% 2.88% 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 448 415 415 407 430 420 440 470 520 570 590 540 570 610 670 750 800 6.25% 50 3.69% 0.00% 3.69% 61.0 36 Camp Keais CR 858 Immokalee Road 2U 626A D N 1,000 272 250 250 143 125 130 180 220 220 190 260 280 280 290 300 330 340 2.94% 10 1.40% 0.00% 2.00% 62.0 68 99905 CR887 Old US 41 Lee County Line Tamiami Trail 2U 547 D N 1,000 893 863 833 725 758 820 890 960 960 1050 1070 1070 1120 1060 1200 1120 1,130 0.88% 10 1.48% 0.00% 2.00% 63.0 99924 CR896 Seagate Drive Crayton Road Tamiami Trail 4D 511 D E 1,700 856 800 639 692 765 810 850 980 970 970 1060 1030 990 840 960 920 890 -3.37% -30 0.24% 0.00% 2.00% 64.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 6D 512 E E 2,800 2,209 1,952 1,684 1,785 1,863 1,830 1,870 1880 1870 1860 1990 1910 1950 1910 1970 2060 2,140 3.74% 80 -0.20% 0.00% 2.00% 65.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Goodlette-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E E 2,800 2,805 2,410 2,056 1,879 1,877 1,890 2,070 1910 1940 1970 1980 2000 2430 2160 2360 2290 2,330 1.72% 40 -1.15% 0.00% 2.00% 66.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Shirley Street Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2,802 2,720 2,889 1,970 2,103 2,070 1,980 2230 2250 2390 2470 2910 32301 3030 3060 32701 3,370 2.97%1 100 1.16% 0.00% 2.00% 67.1 411 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 6D 526 E E 1 3,900 2,887 2,705 2,489 2,318 2,415 2,480 2,580 2660 2660 2550 2610 2980 3540 3330 3480 3600 3,600 0.00% 0 1.39% 0.00% 2.00% 67.2 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ridge Road Livingston Rd. 1-75 6D 628 E E 3,900 3,493 3,087 2,661 2,064 2,388 2,030 2,200 2960 2950 2990 3030 3020 3130 2650 2800 2840 3,920 27.55% 1,080 0.72% 0.00% 2.00% 68.0 41 99907 CR896 Pine Ridge Road I-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2,531 2,237 2,071 1,908 1,963 1,880 1,950 2080 2130 2120 2190 2160 2400 2480 2360 2470 2,690 8.18% 220 0.38% 0.00% 2.00% 69.0 15 65032 CR856 Radio Road Airport Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1,230 1,145 985 1,050 985 1,030 1,060 1110 1120 1180 1180 1180 1160 1030 1110 1050 1,080 2.78% 30 -0.81% 0.00% 2.00oo 70.0 15 65033 CR856 Radio Road Livingston Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1,550 1,154 1,139 882 885 890 960 1120 1110 1130 1170 1120 1440 1490 1580 1560 1,620 3.70% 60 0.28% 0.00% 2.00% 71.0 16 65031 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 4D 685 D W 1,800 750 502 490 600 495 510 480 540 580 630 640 710 690 630 650 680 700 2.86% 20 -0.43% 0.00% 2.00% 72.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rc Tamiami Trail Charlemagne Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1,080 1,007 1,613 1,536 1,486 1,630 1,690 1000 1010 1010 1030 1030 1080 1020 1080 1190 1,180 -0.85% -10 0.55% 0.00% 2.00% 73.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rc Charlemagne Boulevard County Barn Road 4D 517 D E 1,800 767 705 1,099 806 684 640 630 700 700 740 830 760 840 900 920 940 980 4.08 % 40 1.54% 0.00% 2.00% 74.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rc County Barn Road Polly Avenue 4D 534 D E 1,900 696 715 868 621 622 630 620 670 670 700 760 720 800 800 840 900 960 6.25% 60 2.03% 0.00% 2.03% 75.0 77 60169 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Rc Polly Avenue Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E E 2,900 500 419 563 494 378 410 380 500 490 490 530 590 740 770 770 720 800 10.00% 80 2.98% 0.00% 2.98% 76.0 56 62081B Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1,410 1,410 1,102 1,055 1,084 1,090 1,130 1230 1240 1270 1240 1620 1590 1540 1530 1570 1,580 0.63% 10 0.71% 0.00% 2.00% 77.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Radio Road 6D 528 E N 3,100 1,470 1,470 1,328 1,398 1,455 1,630 1,670 1740 1780 1810 1880 1960 2240 2120 2060 2100 2,180 3.67% 80 2.49% 0.00% 2.49% 78.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 6D 537 E N 3,100 950 950 895 1,104 1,171 1,160 1,250 1290 1290 1350 1450 1420 1480 1430 1560 1720 1,600 -7.50% -120 3.31% 0.00% 3.31% 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake -Hammock Rd. 6D 702 E N 3,100 439 695 750 810 840 930 890 950 980 940 890 1000 1010 1,060 4.72% 50 4.00% 4.00% 80.0 SR29 SR 29 Tamiami Trail CR 837 2U 615A D N 900 129 91 91 125 98 110 120 120 90 150 130 140 150 140 170 160 170 5.88% 10 1.74% 0.00% 2.00% 81.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 837 I-75 2U 615A D N 900 129 91 91 125 98 110 120 120 90 150 130 140 150 140 170 160 170 5.88 % 10 1.74% 0.00% 2.00 % 82.0 SR29 SR29 I-75 CR858 2U 615A D N 900 129 91 91 125 98 110 120 120 90 150 130 140 150 140 170 160 170 5.88% 10 1.74% 0.00% 2.00% 83.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 858 CR 29A (New Market) 2U 665A D N 900 404 365 385 386 386 320 320 280 380 410 410 410 420 440 480 530 510 -3.92% -20 1.47% 0.00% 2.00% 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South N 15th St 4D 664 D W 1,700 661 653 642 622 568 560 530 550 600 600 620 590 620 610 610 560 630 11.11% 70 -0.30% 0.00% 2.00% 85.0 SR29 SR 29 N 15th St CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 550 598 539 532 498 500 510 560 620 620 630 620 650 700 660 690 680 -1.47% -10 1.33% 0.00% 2.00% 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 550 598 539 532 498 500 510 560 620 620 630 620 650 700 660 690 680 -1.47% -10 1.33% 0.00% 2.00% 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 402 352 352 304 260 310 260 340 350 360 370 380 390 300 300 300 300 0.00% 0 -1.81% 0.00% 2.00% 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee County Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 740 650 650 560 581 570 570 690 710 650 740 750 790 790 958.1605 950 890 -6.74% -60 1.16% 0.00% 2.00% 91.0 43 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 1,867 1,731 1,821 1,558 1,492 1,520 1,580 1700 1580 1700 1920 1580 1610 1560 1730 1700 1,950 12.82 % 250 0.27% 0.00% 2.00% 92.0 47 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2,521 2,471 2,491 2,068 2,108 2,170 2,340 2320 2240 2300 2460 2230 2780 2820 3110 3080 2,740 -12.41% -340 0.52% 0.00% 2.00% 93.0 46 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boulevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 2,118 2,053 2,038 1,926 1,970 1,980 1,890 1910 1960 1860 1940 1860 1980 1790 2110 2290 2,370 3.38% 80 0.71% 0.00% 2.00% 94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 1,613 1,460 1,705 1,299 1,374 1,310 1,300 1490 1510 1620 1700 1470 1690 1610 1670 1690 1,570 -7.64% -120 -0.17% 0.00% 2.00% 95.1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 E E 3,100 557 640 630 670 670 770 990 1040 900 850 1020 1030 1,000 -3.00% -30 4.00% 4.00% 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Greenway Road 4D 608 D E 2,000 390 448 630 670 670 770 990 1040 900 850 1020 1030 1,000 -3.00% -30 4.00% 4.00% 95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Road CR-92 (San Marco Drive) 2U 570 D E 1,075 180 192 630 670 670 770 990 1040 900 850 1020 250 310 19.35% 60 4.00% 4.00% 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D 1,000 298 200 200 232 222 160 220 220 140 240 200 220 220 210 260 250 250 0.00% 0 -1.09 % 0.00% 2.00% 97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 Dade County Line 2U 616A D 1,000 241 165 165 210 185 140 170 190 150 210 170 190 190 180 230 240 230 -4.35% -10 -0.29% 0.00% 2.00% 98.0 71 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3,100 2,143 2,091 2,046 1,763 1,812 1,870 1,960 1990 1990 2090 2250 2110 2150 2010 2160 2160 2,160 0.00% 0 0.05% 0.00% 2.00% 99.0 50 US41 Tamiami Trail North Wiggins Pass Road Immokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 2,864 2,800 2,688 2,711 2,541 2,540 2,620 2530 2560 2890 3000 2720 2920 2970 3120 3130 3,140 0.32% 10 0.58% 0.00% 2.00% 100.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,410 2,616 2,453 2,103 2,643 2,239 2,140 2,320 2060 2280 2320 1920 1790 1950 2050 2660 2630 2,740 4.01% 110 0.29% 0.00% 2.00% 101.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulf Park Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 2,211 2,263 2,180 2,261 2,179 2,240 2,260 2300 2300 2330 2460 2250 2600 2430 2730 2540 2,060 -23.30% -480 -0.44% 0.00% 2.00% 102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ridge Road 6D 562 E N 3,410 2,398 2,093 2,003 1,982 2,000 2,240 2,210 1860 1860 1900 2010 2190 2340 2290 2530 2430 2,370 -2.53% -60 -0.07% 0.00% 2.00% 108.0 Thomasson Drive Bayshore Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 698 D 800 470 356 419 420 420 470 490 500 510 550 590 520 400 470 460 -2.17% -10 -0.15% 0.00% 2.00% 109.0 42 65071 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Gulfshore Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 524 E E 1,540 920 869 929 863 838 890 940 1040 910 990 990 930 1160 870 1070 1030 1,110 7.21 % 80 1.18% 0.00% 2.00% 110.1 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Tamiami Trail Goodlette-Frank Road 4D 646 D 1,900 1,500 1,500 1,361 1,237 1,360 1,420 1350 1480 1540 1410 1480 1600 1430 1530 1510 1,240 -21.77% -270 -1.26% 0.00% 2.00% 110.2 23 67021 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Goodlette-Frank Rd. Airport Road 4/D 666 D E 2,500 1,520 1,480 1,896 1,570 1,785 1,870 1,830 1700 1700 1760 1750 1760 1770 1590 1860 1850 1,860 0.54% 10 1.27% 0.00% 2.00% 111.1 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport Road Livingston Rd. 6D 579 E E 3,000 1,404 1,471 2,240 1,572 1,644 1,830 1,870 1890 1850 1910 1960 1920 2710 2040 2840 2770 2,760 -0.36% -10 4.00% 4.00% 111.2 63 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Rd. Logan Blvd. 6D 668 E E 3,000 1,490 1,709 2,391 1,648 1,659 1,640 1,660 1800 2000 2150 2070 2210 2420 2400 2580 2680 2,800 4.29% 120 1 4.00% 4.00% 112.0 24 63051 CR862 Vanderbilt Beach Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 580 E E 3,000 624 751 890 953 1,089 1,210 1,240 1250 1230 1530 1690 1640 1950 1680 2040 2170 2,220 2.25% 50 4.00% 4.00% 114.0 25 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Lee County Line Wiggins Pass Road 2U 548 D N 1,000 429 356 411 358 375 380 390 420 420 440 449 458 390 500 570 570 570 0.00% 0 1.79% 0.00% 2.00% 115.0 69061 CR901 Vanderbilt Drive Wiggins Pass Road 11 Ith Avenue 2U 578 D N 1,000 436 412 440 370 374 380 380 420 440 440 449 458 400 980 620 560 570 1.75% 10 1.69 % 0.00% 2.00% 116.0 26 69021 Westclox Rd Carson Rd SR 29 2U 611 D 800 147 143 143 166 184 170 180 210 220 210 210 200 220 210 220 240 280 14.29 % 40 4.00% 4.00% 117.0 99928 CR888 Wiggins Pass Road Vanderbilt Drive Tamiami Trail 2U 669 D E 1,000 386 375 437 364 353 360 360 420 400 430 439 448 420 400 440 410 440 6.82% 30 0.82% 0.00% 2.00% 118.0 Wilson Blvd N. of Immokalee Road Golden Gate Blvd. 2U 650 D N 900 505 391 351 280 259 270 270 260 320 320 340 350 350 420 410 360 420 14.29% 60 - I.15'% 0.00% 2.00% 119.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well Road Immokalee Road Everglades Boulevard 2U 725 D E 2,200 525 565 565 349 418 340 410 490 600 700 850 840 950 1070 1170 1300 1,370 5.11% 70 4.00% 4.00% 120.0 60044 CR858 Oil Well Road Everglades Desoto Oil Well Grade Rd. 2U 694 D E 1,100 397 377 378 133 118 170 230 220 280 280 350 390 370 430 540 550 610 9.84% 60 2.72 % 0.00% 2.72% 121.1 Oil Well Road Desoto Oil Well Grade 694 D 1,100 118 170 230 220 280 280 350 390 370 430 540 550 610 9.84% 60 4.00% 4.00% 121.2 Oil Well Road Oil Well Grade Ave Maria Blvd 728 D 2,000 118 170 230 220 280 280 350 390 370 430 450 500 580 13.79% 80 4.00% 4.00% 122.0 Oil Well Road Ave Maria Blvd . SR 29 2U 730 D E 800 397 377 378 133 118 170 230 220 280 280 350 390 370 430 210 240 200 -20.00% -40 -4.19% 0.00% 2.00% 123.0 60040 Golden Gate Blvd. Wilson 18th Street NE/SE 4U 21J 652 D E 2,300 1,162 1,058 1,078 962 977 950 1,030 1040 1080 1101.6 1190 1270 1440 1480 1580 1760 1,900 7.37% 140 3.12% 0.00% 3.12% 123.1 60040 Golden Gate Blvd. 18th Street NE/SE Everglades 4U 21J 652 D E 2,300 1,162 1,058 1,078 962 977 950 1,030 1040 1080 1101.6 1190 1270 1440 1480 1580 1760 1,900 7.37% 140 3.12% 0.00% 3.12% 124.0 60040 Golden Gate Blvd. Everglades Desoto 2U 722A D E 1,010 1,162 1,058 1,078 962 #N/A 950 210 214 218 223 227 232 237 280 280 360 340 -5.88% -20 -7.39% 0.00% 2.00% 125.0 CR896 Pine Ridge Road Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard 4D 535 D E 2,400 1,509 1,359 1,290 1,238 1,207 1,300 1,300 1,310 1,290 1,320 1340 1540 1610 1590 1660 1780 1,840 3.26% 60 1.25% 0.00% 2.00% 132.0 Randal Blvd. Immokalee Everglades 2U 651 D E 900 686 669 723 764 749 730 720 730 850 870 820 810 870 810 780 790 890 11.24% 100 1.64% 0.00% 2.00% 133.0 Randal Blvd. Everglades Desoto 2U 721A D E 900 686 669 723 764 #N/A 730 590 602 614 626 639 652 665 170 190 150 170 11.76% 20 -8.35% 0.00% 2.00% 134.0 Everglades I-75 Golden Gate Blvd 2U 637S D S 800 336 370 341 305 308 370 360 370 410 430 450 530 541 420 500 570 620 8.06% 50 3.90% 0.00% 3.90% 135.0 Everglades Golden Gate Blvd. Oil Well 2U 636S D N 800 3301 299 299 304 264 270 260 280 310 280 310 410 418 370 420 480 5401 11.11% 60 3.13% 0.00% 3.13% 136.0 Everglades I Oil Well Immokalee 2U 635S D N 800 389 360 360 3261 348 320 300 640 390 410 450 490 560 610 690 750 920 18.48% 170 4.00% 4.00% 137.0 Desoto Blvd. I-75 Golden Gate Blvd. 2U 639A D S 800 95 92 115 921 103 120 IF 130 140 140 150 140 160 180 180 230 200 -15.00% -30 4.00% 4.00% 138.0 Desoto Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. Oil Well Rd. 2U 638A D N 800 109 75 75 871 80 80 90 80 100 100 110 130 140 150 170 200 210 4.76% 10 4.00% 4.00°fo 142.0 Orange Blossom Goodlette Airport 2U 647 D E 1,320 668 603 599 575 645 550 500 510 600 540 400 380 410 490 580 650 710 8.45% 60 0.38% 0.00% 2.00% 143.0 Orange Blossom Airport Livingston Rd. 2U 647 D E 1,000 668 603 599 575 645 550 500 510 600 540 400 380 410 490 580 650 710 8.45 % 60 0.38% 0.00% 2.00% 144.0 Shadowlawn Dr. Tamiami Trail Davis 2U 523 D S 800 268 259 261 252 231 230 230 230 230 230 230 220 250 450 270 300 320 6.25 % 20 1.11% 0.00% 2.00% Page 702 of 745 � - Nq �-,* . . . . . . ...... . EffAM 0 ra 0 m proudHouse ----BUILDERS Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 List of Requested Deviations with Justification No deviations are requested for this submittal. Page 704 of 745 < ProudHouse B U I L D E R S November 20, 2025 Collier County Planning & Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20250009053 - Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest) Rezone - Submittal 2 Dear Planning & Zoning Staff, We have received Review Letter 1 (dated October 16, 2025, 2025) related to the subject planning application. Our responses to the review comments are provided as follows. Miscellaneous Item: The following title has been drafted to describe this petition for public notice purposes. Please review this for accuracy and advise me of any necessary changes in writing: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agriculture (A) to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to allow up to 12 residential dwelling units with a maximum density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre (DUA) on 4.04± acres of property located north of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200 feet east of Collier Boulevard in Section 3 North 1/2 and South 1/2, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Response: Draft response. Review: Addressing - GIS Review Reviewed By: Annis Moxam Email: annis.moxam@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-5519 Correction Comment 1: Project name not approved, the word/name Eagle is overused to start a project name with. Response: The project name has been changed to "Copperstone Estates." Reviewed By: Jocelyn Nageon de Lestang Email: Jocelyn.NageondeLestang@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2434 Correction Comment 1: Rev-1 Advisory comments - General: Applicant should be aware that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) with an approved stormwater system will be required for any change in land use or proposed development. In addition, site development approval (SDP / PPL) will be required from Collier County to ensure that local development standards are maintained and that proposed stormwater system(s) are designed consistent with relevant LDC and County Ordinances for water quality and water quantity, during both the interim construction phase and final implementation. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Page 705 of 745 Correction Comment 2: Rev-1 Advisory comments - Stormwater criteria: 1. Project water quality retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the volumetric requirements provided in the ERP AH Vol II for use within the geographic limits of the SFWMD (2014). 2. Allowable project off -site discharge rate shall not exceed 0.04 cfs/ac per Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin South, and shall be computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Review: Engineering Surveyor Review Reviewed By: Marcus Berman Email: marcus.berman@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-6885 Correction Comment 1: Exhibit D: This description should match the Warranty Deed exactly. Please re -review. All symbols and text (spelled correctly) should be the same. Response: Exhibit D has been revised to match the Warranty Deed in response to this comment. Correction Comment 2: Boundary Survey: Please add all dimensions listed in the legal descriptions to each parcel. Response: Boundary surveys of the individual parcels have been submitted to accommodate the requested information. Review: Environmental Review Reviewed By: Craig Brown Email: Craig.Brown@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2548 Correction Comment 1: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please provide the credentials of the person(s) who have produced the environmental data report. Response: The credentials of the person(s) who have produced the environmental data report are included in Attachment A of this letter. Correction Comment 2: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please identify how much of the existing property is considered native vegetation (LDC 3.05.07.A.1) and adjust the preservation calculation amounts shown on the master concept plan. Response: With regards to native vegetation, exotics dominate 50-100 percent of the property; the E3 community (1.63 acres of the site) could be considered partially native. The preservation calculations shown in the master concept plan have been adjusted to identify the 1.63 acres as native vegetation. Correction Comment 3: The preservation required setback has been shown as a zero within the Development Standards Table, as well as on the Master Plan. Please revise both to meet the requirements of LDC 3.05.07 H.3.a. Response: The Development Standards Table and Master Concept Plan have been revised to meet the requirements of LDC 3.05.07 H.3.a. Page 706 of 745 Correction Comment 4: Please revise the preservation configuration to consolidate the preservation to one area; the picture frame preservation is not supported by ES Staff. LDC 3.05.07 H.1.b. Response: The Master Concept Plan has been revised to accommodate this request. Correction Comment 5: Miscellaneous Corrections Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1 and Objective 7.1. Response: The evaluation criteria document has been updated to address this comment. Review: Historical Review Reviewed By: Ray Bellows Email: ray.bellows@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2463 Correction Comment 1: An archaeological survey and assessment is required since the eastern portion of the site is located within an area designated as having a high potential of containing archaeological artifacts. The survey shall be prepared pursuant to Section 2.03.07.E.2 of the Land Development Code. Response: A waiver application from required historical and archaeological survey and assessment has been included as part of 2nd submittal. Review: Public Utilities - PUED Review Reviewed By: Claudia Carmenate Email: Claudia.Carmenate@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-1335 Correction Comment 1: 10.10.2025 In the Evaluation Criteria and Cover Letter documents, under Need for the Amendment, 2, indicates "The parcels are served by existing Collier County water, sewer, and roadway infrastructure." Please consider revising this statement to more closely address the existing conditions. The following sample language is offered for consideration during revision: "Water and sewer will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process." Response: The requested language has been incorporated into the Evaluation Criteria and Cover Letter documents. Correction Comment 2: 10.10.2025 In the Evaluation Criteria document, under Potable Water Sub -Element, it indicates "There are no existing or anticipated capacity issues with regard to potable water systems." Please consider revising this statement to more closely address the narrative requirements. The following sample language is offered for consideration during revision: "Potable water will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process." Response: The requested language has been incorporated into the Evaluation Criteria document. Page 707 of 745 Correction Comment 3: 10.10.2025 In the Evaluation Criteria document, under Wastewater Treatment Sub -Element, it indicates "There are no existing or anticipated wastewater treatment deficiencies; therefore, the project is consistent with the Capital Improvement Element." Please consider revising this statement to more closely address the narrative requirements. The following sample language is offered for consideration during revision: "Wastewater will support the development in the current state or via improvements determined during the Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) process." Response: The requested language has been incorporated into the Evaluation Criteria document. Correction Comment 4: 10.10.2025 Please add a note to Exhibit B Development Standard Tables stating, "Setbacks must comply with the required separation between utility infrastructure and buildings or structures provided in the Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance, Chapter 134, Article III of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances". Response: The requested note has been incorporated into Exhibit B. Correction Comment 5: 10.10.2025 Please add "At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the wastewater collection/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow from the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades." to "Exhibit F." Response: The requested language has been incorporated into Exhibit F. Correction Comment 6: 10.10.2025 Please add "At the time of application for subdivision Plans and Plat (PPL) and/or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval, as the case may be, offsite improvements and/or upgrades to the water distribution/transmission system may be required to adequately handle the total estimated peak hour flow to the project. Whether or not such improvements are necessary, and if so, the exact nature of such improvements and/or upgrades shall be determined during PPL or SDP review. Such improvement and/or upgrades as may be necessary shall be permitted and installed at the developer's expense and may be required to be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion or phase of the development that triggers the need for such improvements and/or upgrades." to "Exhibit F." Response: The requested language has been incorporated into Exhibit F. Page 708 of 745 Review: School District Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach for Amy Lockhart Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 1: Review comments will be provided as soon as they are available. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Review: Transportation Planning Review Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer Email: michael.sawyer@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2926 Correction Comment 1: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1:Verify the growth percentages listed in Exhibit 5 are consistent with the 2024 AUIR. For example, link 34.0 is listed in the AUIR with a growth rate of 2%, but it is listed in Exhibit 5 with 4%. Also, verify all calculations in Exhibit 5 are correct. For example, the 2030 background volumes using the growth rate method for links 96.0 and 97.0 should correctly be 282 and 259, respectively, but Exhibit 5 shows these volumes as 250 and 240, respectively. Response: The growth percentages listed in Exhibit 5 have been checked for consistency with the 2024 AUIR and updated where needed. It should be noted that a minimum 2% growth rate was applied. Additionally, growth rates reported in the AUIR were moderated to a maximum growth rate of 4% for reasonableness based on a historic growth trend analysis of FDOT AADT data. This clarification (and supporting data) is provided in the revised TIS. All calculations in Exhibit 5 have been corrected where needed. Correction Comment 2: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev. 1: Revise the trip limit commitment in Exhibit F of the PUD document by inserting the word "maximum" before "total daily trip generation". Response: Exhibit F has been revised to address this comment. Correction Comment 3: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.1: 3. Revise the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit C in the PUD document, to include potential interconnections to the northwest and southeast as requested in the Pre-App Notes or explain why they are not possible. Also, provide documentation showing you met with FDOT to address ROW access permitting, turn -lane, and stormwater crossing requirements for your proposed access as requested in the Pre-App Notes. Response: The requested interconnections to the northwest and southeast are not considered feasible based on the following: 1. The limited size of the property introduces spatial constraints, making the dedication of sufficient right-of-way or easement for roads, sidewalks, and bike lanes for two new through - connections challenging without significantly reducing the developable area, which undermines the project's viability. 2. The cost associated with the shared access or interconnection is potentially unreasonable. Page 709 of 745 3. The abutting uses (86 -Counties Including Non -Municipal Gov.; And 97 -Outdoor Recreational or Parkland Subject) are incompatible with the proposed residential uses. 4. There is little to no benefit of providing shared access or interconnection due to the limited development potential of the adjoining properties. Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 1: PUD Document, General Comment: Please add the name of the PUD, Eaglecrest RPUD, to the top of each Exhibit page. Response: The name of the PUD has been added to the top of each Exhibit page. Correction Comment 2: PUD Document, General Comment: Please see attached redlines. Response: The PUD document has been updated in response to the provided redlines. Correction Comment 3: PUD Exhibit A: Please remove the Hearing Examiner criteria items 1 through 3 from the Principal Uses and the Accessory Uses. Response: Exhibit A has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 4: 4. PUD Exhibit A, item B. Accessory Uses: Please create a separate entry for the following: a. Garages and Carports b. Swimming Pools and Spas c. Screen Enclosures d. Utility Buildings Response: Exhibit A has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 5: PUD Exhibit A: Will there be an Amenity Center? Will there be Model Homes? If so, please add them to the List of Permitted Uses. Response: Please refer to the updated list of permitted uses. Correction Comment 6: PUD Exhibit B: Please add "Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) to the end of the first paragraph. Response: Exhibit B has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 7: PUD Exhibit B: Please enlarge the Development Standards Table. Response: Exhibit B has been updated in response to this comment. Page 710 of 745 Correction Comment 8: PUD Exhibit B: Please include the Maximum Actual Height in the Development Standards Table. Response: Exhibit B has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 9: PUD Exhibit B: Please add an "*" after "SPS" in the Development Standards Table and create a footnote with the definition of "SPS." Response: Exhibit B has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 10: PUD Exhibit C: Please add the minimum landscape buffers to the Master Plan. Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 11: PUD Exhibit C: For clarity, please remove the FLU designation from the Master Plan. Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 12: PUD Exhibit C: Please show the amount of Open Space provided. Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 13: PUD Exhibit C: Please provide the following: a. Current and proposed zoning designation b. Proposed number of dwelling units and density c. Maximum zoned building height Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 14: PUD Exhibit B: Please add the Development Standards for Multi -family, Townhouse, Zero Lot Line, and Two- family. Response: Exhibit B has been revised to remove Multi -family, Townhouse, Zero Lot Line, and Two- family from the list of permitted uses. Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Email: heidi.ashton@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-8773 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide an affidavit of authorization signed by owner Abdul Awan or other evidence of the owner's consent to the rezone. Response: An affidavit of authorization signed by owner Abdul Awan has been included in the 2°d submittal. Page 711 of 745 Correction Comment 2: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please address my comments and requested changes per my 10-13-25 review of the PUD document [Exhibits A-F], to be provided by email by County staff. Response: The comments and requested changes have been addressed in the revised PUD documents. Rejected Review: Landscape Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 1: 1.On the Master Plan, please show the minimum required landscape buffers: - A 15-foot wide Type B Landscape Buffer along the north property line A 10-foot wide Type A Landscape Buffer along the east property line A 15-foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer along the south property line A 10-foot wide Type A Landscape Buffer along the west property line Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. We respectfully request your review and approval of this application. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Karim Ismail Project Manager ProudHouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Ste 205 Cape Coral, FL 33990-3628 Tel: 407-990-2880 Email: karimOblueprintpal.com Page 712 of 745 Attachment A Credentials of Environmental Consultants Page 713 of 745 CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES As president and CEO of BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Mr. Stejskal is responsible for all management duties of the firm and project coordination. The clients Mr. Stejskal works with include both the private and public sectors with a primary focus on Lee, Charlotte, Hendry, Collier, Glades, Desoto, Highlands, and Sarasota Counties. Besides the corporate responsibilities, as a consultant and ecologist, Mr. Stejskal is responsible for coordination of environmental permitting, conducting wildlife surveys, wetland delineations, and other environmental reports. He also has been qualified as an expert in wetland and wildlife ecology and environmental land use in both Lee, Collier, and Hendry County. Mr. Stejskal had also previously carried a certification as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Since 2003, Mr. Stejskal has managed projects, conducted fieldwork, and produced reports and applications for land use planning and development. These projects include due diligence assessments for land acquisition purposes, assistance with environmental site planning, coordination over permitting and mitigation design for wetlands and wildlife, and compliance monitoring of projects, both during and after construction. Mr. Stejskal has received certification from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) in ARC GIS I & II, as well as additional training on gopher tortoise permitting and relocations from the Ashton Biodiversity Institute. PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE o Ajax US 17 & State Road 29: Audubon's crested caracara, sandhill crane, Big Cypress fox squirrel nest survey and observation for the Florida Department of Transportation in Glades County. o Arlington Commerce Park: Wetland and ecological permitting for a mixed -use development with red -cockaded woodpecker permitting in Lee County. o Colonial/Ortiz: Wetland, ecological, and wildlife permitting for the red -cockaded woodpecker and the big cypress fox squirrel for a medical office development along with wetland monitoring in Lee County. o Sonoma Preserve: Wetland impact and mitigation design for a commercial mixed -use golf course community, with gopher tortoise and scrub jay permitting in Desoto County. o North Fort Myers Restoration: Permitting and construction coordination for a hydrological and ecological restoration project in Lee County. o Cook -Brown Mine: A large mining project in Charlotte County that involved in-depth impact assessments, as well as both environmental and wetland permitting for the existing mine expansion project. Barrett Stejskal President, CEO, Consultant, & Ecologist Experience: o 25+ Years of Environmental Experience Focusing in Lee, Charlotte, Hendry, Collier, Glades, Desoto, Highlands, and Sarasota Counties Education: o Florida Gulf Coast University, BA, 2003 Environmental Studies & Biology Previous Professional Affiliations: o Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals o Lee County Conservation Land Acquisition and Stewardship Advisory Committee Certification: o FWC —Former Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent Permit #: GTA-09-0002OF o Autodesk AutoCAD Certification AutoCAD Training Courses o Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)—ARC GIS I & II Areas of Expertise: o Ecological Sciences — Wetland & Wildlife Ecology o Audubon's Crested Caracara Monitoring & Observations o Gopher Tortoise Surveys, Relocations, & Excavations o Sandhill Crane Nest Surveys & Species Monitoring o Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Utilizing ACAD, GIS & GPS o Wetland Permitting and Mitigation o ACOE, DEP, and State Wetland Delineations o Impact Assessments o Wildlife Surveys and Species Relocations o Wildlife Habitat Management Planning and Permitting o Habitat Restoration and Mitigation Design o Environmental Land Use Permitting and Rezoning o Local, State, and Federal Environmental Permitting o Post Permit Compliance and Monitoring Contact Information: Barrett Stejskal President, CEO, Consultant, & Ecologist BearPaws Environmental Consulting 1599 Covington Circle East Fort Myers Florida 33919 Phone: (239) 340-0678 Email: bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com Website: http://www.bearpawsenvconsulting.com rage / i 4 oT t4b CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES As vice president of BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Mrs. Stejskal is responsible for all financial duties of the firm. The clients Mrs. Stejskal works with include both the private and public sectors. Besides the corporate responsibilities, also as a consultant and ecologist, Mrs. Stejskal is responsible for assisting in the efforts of environmental permitting, conducting wildlife surveys, wetland delineations, and other environmental reports. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mrs. Stejskal has managed projects, conducted fieldwork, and produced reports and applications for land use planning and development. These projects include due diligence assessments for land acquisition purposes, assistance with environmental land planning, coordination on permitting and mitigation design for wetlands and wildlife, and compliance monitoring of projects during and after construction. Previous experience also includes working with Lee County as an intern, while attending Florida Gulf Coast University, in their Environmental Sciences Division. In addition, she has received certification from the Richard Chinn U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation and Management Training Program and gopher tortoise Natural History, Relocation, and Management program offered by Ray Ashton. She also has been qualified as an expert in wetland and wildlife ecology in Lee County. PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE o Bell Road Mine: Big cypress fox squirrel, rezoning, and DEP permitting for a mine in Lee County. o Chapel Creek: Bald eagle, gopher tortoise and wetland permitting for a mixed use development in Lee County. o Fichter's Creek Restoration: Crested caracara, gopher tortoise, restoration design, and wetland permitting for a restoration project in Lee County. o Hendry -Labelle Regional Park: Impact assessment for a park project in Hendry County. o Panther Mine Expansion: Impact assessment and permitting for a mine expansion in Charlotte County. o Portofino Vineyards: Protected species survey, cabbage palm survey, and gopher tortoise relocation for a residential development in Lee County. o Three Oaks Parkway Extension: Protected species survey, wetland permitting for a roadway project in Lee County. Christina Stejskal Vice -President, CFO, Consultant, & Ecologist Experience: o 20+Years of Environmental Experience Education: o Florida Gulf Coast University, BA, 2003 Environmental Studies Professional Affiliations: o Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals o Ecological Society of America Areas of Expertise: o Ecological Sciences o Gopher Tortoise Surveys & Relocations o Audubon's Crested Caracara Monitoring & Observations o Sandhill Crane Nest Surveys & Species Monitoring o Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Utilizing AutoCAD & GPS o Wetland Permitting and Mitigation o Corps and State Wetland Delineations o Impact Assessments o Wildlife Surveys and Species Relocations o Wildlife Habitat Management Planning and Permitting o Habitat Restoration and Mitigation Design o Environmental Land Use Permitting and Rezoning o Local, State, and Federal Environmental Permitting o Post Permit Compliance and Monitoring Contact Information: Christina Stejskal Vice President, CFO, Consultant, & Ecologist BearPaws Environmental Consulting 1599 Covington Circle East, Fort Myers, FL 33919 Phone: (239) 560-8441 Email: bearpawsenvconsulting@gmail.com christina@bearpawsenv.com Website: http://www.bearpawsenvconsulting.com Page 715 of 745 ProudHouse B U I L D E R S November 20, 2025 Collier County Planning & Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20250009053 - Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest) Rezone - Submittal 2 Dear Planning & Zoning Staff, On behalf of ProudHouse Builders LLC, we respectfully submit this application to waive the requirement for a Historical and Archaeological Survey and Assessment for the Copperstone Estates RPUD project (Parcel IDs 00724880001 & 0072452002), pursuantto LDC Subsection 2.03.07 E 2.j. The waiver is requested because the subject property exhibits a low potential for undisturbed historical or archaeological sites. The site is only 4.04 acres, and its historical land use is undeveloped acreage, consistent with its long-term Agricultural zoning. Interpretation of aerial photographs confirms the long-term absence of any structures or cultural features and demonstrates the property has been previously disturbed, supporting a low potential for undisturbed archaeological resources. The existing vegetative cover consists of disturbed native communities, specifically 1.64 acres of Upland Pine (FLUCFCS code 411E3) and 2.40 acres of Mixed Upland Hardwoods (FLUCFCS code 420E4), both of which are noted to have significant exotic vegetation invasion, further indicating prior land alteration. Based on these factors, which indicate that any potential resource has been destroyed or severely impacted, the need for a full survey is unwarranted. Documents included as part of the waiver application submittal include the following: 1. Cover Letter with Narrative Statement 2. Completed Waiver Application from Required Historical and Archaeological Survey and Assessment 3. Signed and Sealed Survey 4. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 5. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 6. Aerial photograph with project boundary and FLUCFCS Codes We respectfully request your review and approval of this application. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Karim Ismail Project Manager ProudHouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Ste 205 Cape Coral, FL 33990-3628 Tel: 407-990-2880 Email: karim@blueprintpal.com Page 716 of 745 Co ler County Growth Management Community Development Department Need Help? GMCD Public Portal Online Payment Guide E-Permitting Guides L. WAIVER APPLICATION FROM REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT LDC Subsection 2.03.07 E 2.j. SUBMITTAL DATE: TB ASSIGNED PLANNER: Nancy Gundlach PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH WAIVER: PL20250009053 PROJECT NAME: Copperstone Estates RPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) Parcel I Ds 00724880001 & 0072452002 Survey included with Application. SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: Property has low potential for historical/ archaeological significance given location and surrounding development. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Growth Management Community Development to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 1 of 5 Planning and Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 www.coiliercountVfl.gov/ Page 717 of 745 APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s):Abd u I Awa n Name of Applicant if different than owner: Karim Ismail Address: 1871 16TH ST NE City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34120 Telephone: E-Mail Address: Cell: Name of Agent: Karim Ismail Firm: ProudHouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd, Ste 205 Cape Coral Address: City: I� Telephone: 407-990-2880 Cell: E-Mail Address: karim@blueprintpal.com Property I.D. Number State: FL Zip: 33990 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: 3 / 51 /26 Subdivision:100 -ACREAGE HEADER Plat Book N/A Page # N/A Metes & Bounds Description Block: N/A Lot: N/A Survey included with Application. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 2 of 5 Page 718 of 745 PROPERTY INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Size of Property:400 440 ft. Total Sq. ft. 176000 Acres4.04 Width Along Roadway: 440 ft Depth:400 ft Present Zoning Classification:Ag ricu Itu ral Present Use of Property: Vacant REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with narrative statement detailing the reason for the waiver request Completed application with required attachments (download latest version) Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized Property Ownership Disclosure Form Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Any other conditions in previously approved development order(s). NIA N/A Other: 26 ❑ Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 3 of 5 Page 719 of 745 WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. I. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Aerial photographs do not indicate any readily apparent signs of historic structures or cultural features. 2. Historical Land Use Description: The property's historical land use consists of undeveloped acreage, consistent with its long-term zoning as Agricultural. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site consists of disturbed native vegetation, with 1.64 acres of Upland Pine (FLUCFCS code 411 E3) and 2.40 acres of Pine Flatwoods (FLUCFCS code 420E4). 4. Other: N/A B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Waiver of History Survey Application (HDW) 4/08/24 Page 4 of 5 Page 720 of 745 1 1'14It 111,If' 1 I It IN —71 1 1114 111%1►I1l 11111 1411,111 he II'4111111M11►11' IIII IIII, ill I Ill ill y ill 141 111111II1t•fCllf'MM 111 1111% 111►1►1►, cmtltt Am mm, ►11'IIINn 111 Itlllhllt nal voliwi11na twi vMMlltlled (lllr to file a1lhmlllal III lnnl It n11t1►, ill Ilh 111111110v 11111unIIIll1u1 %llttll hr 11w 1r•,1unl•Ilhlllly of the nf►rlirtlnl 1i III 11►ha111111tim it111►11I sled ► ith 11w applIt 111111m houmnca 11 Int1t u) 111c puhllc rncrlrcl and illimll I►►, It pli'llmilwnl 111111 Ill 111r lilt, 1 \Il 11114k%II11IkIM11 mill v\hIh11M MIII►nllllt'll Nlutll hr ill .I Him will lit or conveniently IIN41 W III Intl► 11 logal 41/111 H I ," r 1 •I") hlltlel SigiiiIlurt• of Applicant or Agent Karim Ismail 116ttlntl Nuntc of Applicant or Agent Ill lit t M11'1 1 11 1► 11% 1111, CONIMUNt'I'N 11b',1'I,I,111'NII',NI'til'.ItN'[('I.,ti IMISION- N(11'I(IF 4*' 1111;1'Itil(IN ht 1 oultl� Millutgrt tiI dvoRtim hiss n► ldo Ihr fullowlty dolvrnlinatioll: ] Appimviltill Ily: j App1u►etl wllh ('ou1111huIs ow BY: -- — (MOC 41111t lit -ill ] D0111011 till ley: (Mve 11111IClikd) Walvol of 111stoty hinvoy //1111111 Whin (I WW) 4111004 Pitua 5 of 5 Page 721 of 745 SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY SURVEY:W202505328 Legal Description As Furnished: N PARCEL 1: Part of the North 12 of Section 3, Township 51 'South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, /O Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18'29" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said fight of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 3946" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. LINE TABLE: L-1 N 54°20'16" W - 440.00' D. N 54°20'38" W - 440.08, M. L-2 N 54:20.16" W - 227.51 D N 5420'18" W - 227:53' M L-3 N 35°39'44" E - 100.00' P. N 35°37'10" W - 99.93' C. L-4 N 54*20'16" W - 660.00' P. N 54°20'39" W - 659.90' M. pqR eS�B, 0014�2p0 S47 0 F�`S / \°SO/ S cO<F`<6g� N 79 00 \� G " 9 ?yo ?2 \G� �' .A. n s sl• F <., SFr, P.O.C. AT FROM THE AST 1/4 CORNER EOF SECTIONH3, OA'9,(� 0j21 j�i TOW RANGE CM 4 X4' `iQS 622 /Q DISC SSg120. e�qC �J �BsysF. y O / R<s 47' �e 2s880p0 F /i>s gyTA Osro) ' /o o Est 9coFsQA 2 od / b0 / ° O rya' UP GO ✓\a ,^°d' faro aP QP �f Y a yC O 700 Q'a ce tS' Oh o ° °/o O °0 4j "c 4w,v O�(70,�Q' 7Oxq ��q sa .lA, 4Bo F0 F2S/S !2 N 89°18'29" W - 722.30' D. 00j'4OF! N 89°18'19" W- 722.28' C. Legal Description As Furnished PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly desert, it as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 114 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North fight of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 2016" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 20"16" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Legend: LAN -E—UNE ENCL EN —SURE WILL'S SERVICE GROUP LLC. LAND SURVEYOR & MAPPER L.B.8419 contact@wilisserviregroup.com 303 NE 3RD AVE. STE 9 CAPE CORAL FLORIDA- 33909 (239) 478 4242 p5 P • N"m��1r ONAk 7y 1d.,99,4 74, A C r uuem sxlsnxc nRsxroawr ax wxc on or' anAL lsaw eo�ivn" coxc.sus ® . x w �rvMHOR assxm scnLer rzvow L ® sR cxx wvea OF m' No— MARTOR K rom secx RnreBMLTsa coxcasreMoxuMNar ® ® wnren 0' 40' 80' DATE OF SURVEYxE DRAWN BY F.D. CHECKED BY 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY ENOT ABSTRACTED THE 2. THIs CERTIFICARONIS ONLY FOR Survevo s Notes: OTHERS. NO EXAMINATION or TITLE MADE BY SURVEYOR. THE LANDS FOR EASEMENTS ORETHER RECORDED ENCUMBRANCES NOT THE (ANDS DESCRIBED. IT IS NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE. ZONING, 1" Inch = 80' ft. 06/23/2025 COMPLETION DATE: 0710112025 M.F.r GRAPHIC SCALE WALLTIES ARE TO THE FACE OF THE WALLANDARE -MENTS WERE NOT NOTTO BE USED TO RECONSTRUCT BOUNDARY LINES LOCATED RAISED BE"` OF " FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND PROPERTY AND OWNER INFORMATION 13XXX Tamiami Trail East Naples FI 34114 PROUDHOUSE BUILDERS LLC, it's successor's and/or assigns andthe Department of Housing and Urban Development as their interests may appear Parcel LD.: 007248801701 CounNlState: 5, THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED FOR MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY EXCLUSIVELY FOR THIS USE BY THOSE TO TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PERMITTING, DESIGN OR ANY WITHOUT0 ER USE e. NO EFFORTWASMADE TO PROVE PLAT BOUNDARIES. Collier/Florida 00724520002 a oiEINDEC:HEmNSONsARE IN 1EETAo—REOF. PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESER—ION$, AND RIGHTOF-WAYS OF RECORD. INTI ANY Nr (s7 EREON AN E Legal Description AS Furnished: See above PERTAININGTO THE° (Si MUsLT BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT OR HE CLIENTS AGENT PER FLORIDASTATUJE'CHAPTER 5J-17" OF THE FLORIOAADMINISTRAT-CODE. GUSTAVO",..w INTERIAN em,.=°u^=m"+'3=mN' 07-01-2025 GUSTAVO INTERIAN. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORAND MAPPER LS.6461 STATE OF FLORIDA. Flood Zone Information: ommun y N.— COUIEA COUNTY UNINCORPORATED ARFAS muneBZNumber120057 : 7 �� OilOerz024 lootl Zone: AE xM B.FE = 8.0'� of 745 CO*IeY Count y 'RnPFRTY OWNERSHIP DISri nSURE FnRm This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: I IS Name and Address % of Ownership Abdul Awan 100 1 1871 16TH ST NE Naples FL 34120 1 1 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 723 of 745 CO*ier Count y d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Proudhouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Suite 205 Cape Coral FL 33990 Jack Selig Jr 50 Guido Leiendecker 50 Date of Contract: 5/29/25 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of , or trust: Name and Address Eaglecrest Luxury Villas, LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Suite 205 Cape Coral FL 33990 1 g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease Samuel Hayes Jamell Jr. years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Page 724 of 745 Coder Count y Date of option: NA Date option terminates: NA , or After Rezone Completion Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Community Development Department I GMD Portal: https://cvportal.colliercountyfl.gov/cityviewweb Questions? Email: GMDclientservices@colliercountyfl.gov 9��4_�5 8/10/25 Agent/Owner Sig ture Date Jack M Selig Jr. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Page 725 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PErrrloN NUMBERS($) (print name), as "*aw'w (tilts, ii applicable) of ern(company, if a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that i ant the (Cheose Mile) owner applicant ntrsrt purchasand that 1 1 have full authority to secure the app„ov8l(5) requested and to impose covenants ana resUsAitnto in. the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County In accordance with this application and the Land Development Code: 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any are honest sketches, d true; other supp%mentar�y rnatter attached hereto and made a part Of this applr 3 I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4 The property will be transferred, Conveyed, sold or sUbdivrdeo SUOPW +A restriction imposed by tha approved action. 5 We/1 suttwrixe � *a uc ,s.,, ,d..>L uwe. to act as ourirny representative in any matters tegaming tftis petition including 1 through 2 above. Notes. • if the applicant is a corporation. Glen it is usuaity executed by the corp. Ares. or v. Pms. • If [tile aWiicara is a L imlted t.iabdify Company (L..L..C.) or L.oWed Company ft_.CJ) luw the documents should 4piwily ba signed by the Company's "Managing Mom bar." . if the applicant is a partnefship, Phan typically a partner can sign on hehaff of the partnership. • tf the applicant is a trmr7ed partnership, then the general partner must sign and be fdentiffed as the 'general pa:irfar of the named partnership. tT fha applit *M is a trust, then May must include the trustee's name afKd fhe words 'as trustee °- • Jr each instanoe, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., irttfrvrdual, corporate, trust, partnership, and rites use the appropriate (ormaf for that 4ownership. Finder pan 109, 1 declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authortimfion and that the face jai true. Signature • Datte or STATE FLORIDA CO(J OF COLLIER for m i ri was abefore me c%4aged befome by mans of I presence or E] vrome nouNuatkpnhia S dgy f , 20)� by (prirttad name of owner or qualifier; sw-t pw&w4r,) Notary PulAc must dw* applicable both © Are pwsonaltj known So ffw piodoced s s ffmrit 11(invere license Hrxr produced sa. We �I +� Irff 1\1idft&'&i 4e P. Rom -an MY 3ftf" 'r ComTiss�crlate ti _ AA Corrrr.:x:trEs Page 726 of 745 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) y SE.fr (print name), as t � n S itlB, if applicable} of cam any. If a Pica le], swear or affirm under oath, tart I am the (choose one) owner applicant[ �Qntract purchaserand that., t , I have full authorlty to secure the approval(s) requested and to Impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced properly as a result of any action approved by the County ir1 amordanre with thys application and the Land Development Coda; 2_ All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize S17'tQl to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes • If the applicant is a corporation, then: it is usually executed by the core. Ares. or v. pres. ■ if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L-C_), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • !f the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. ■ !f the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner rr►ust sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee". . In each instance, first determine the applicants status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then- lt�e appropriate format for that owr+ershw. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts state77; true•. atu � Doke STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF-9014:1--iR— LCP— The�foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by rneans of Elphysical presence or online notarization this day of - 20a, by (printed name of owner or quarifier) Jcv Such Person(s) Notary Public must check applicable boxy 0 Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license WHas produced Notary cI`48- )A-06lt5EV 1i55 R3!kl:o2o Yap gtIIABETII ntary Sa:�'. ion.` Notary Public . State of Florida Commission # HH 308662 My Comm. Expires Oct 7, 2026 Page 727 of 745 � ��.✓ � r _ � � � +gyp � �� ` � ~^ t��A` r' � . - l - .yell - k� a_.L"6J� l - - JJr or VI! l�ly.- f M�� _ �s:► �� - ��i �� _ �, �,• T 'ice' -�, •1� �•t`f' Scale: 1" = 100' y y�w ,' '` '�• 'fir_ ` 420 E4 `.,' `�s* : _ =.� r. _ 4 as �:.-zor if .� -j�r '� �-/ -••�.t'-4�� '�.����� �_.��y� � _ -r iT.,: - �. .��r�'�Yl��bffff —� .,e� .• ate''-�' ''�3•.r;• - 'Cr ..I�..1i���`l�`- 1 _+y '" �` ' ;� C �a _ t$— i► A J� t--'yam }Y��Ij� Vt r _ , ;- (1.64 Ac.±) lot — rr \ :1 may' 4 •? x-NOTES: FLUCFCS lines estimated from 1 "=200'aerial photographs and locations approximated. FLUCFCS Project FLUCFCS per Florida Lind Use, Code Acreage Description Pine ••• • 1 •t v s Y System (FLUCFCS) •• Z.. =�-.. fromAerial photographs were acquired ;; . suer. cProudHouse BUILDERS January 16, 2026 Collier County Planning & Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20250009053 - Copperstone Estates RPUD (FKA Eaglecrest) Rezone - Submittal 3 Dear Planning & Zoning Staff, We have received Review Letter 2 (dated January 5, 2026) related to the subject planning application. Our responses to the review comments are provided as follows. Review: Environmental Review Reviewed By: Craig Brown Email: Craig.Brown@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2548 Correction Comment 1: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Please provide the credentials of the person(s) who have produced the environmental data report. Review 2: Please provide a resume for the person(s) who produced the Environmental Data report. Response: The resumes of the environmental consultants who have produced the environmental data report have been uploaded as part of submittal 3. Please refer to the document titled "Submittal 3 19 Resumes for Environmental Consultants.pdf' Correction Comment 5: Miscellaneous Corrections Please address how the proposed project is consistent with Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1 and Objective 7.1. Review 2: Please revise the Evaluation Criteria and the narrative in relation to Policy 6.1.1. The preservation requirement described is not correct; the preservation requirement is 25%. Response: The Evaluation Criteria and the narrative have been revised to correctly indicate a preservation requirement of 25%. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 1 of 4 Page 729 of 745 Review: Historical Review Reviewed By: Ray Bellows Email: ray.bellows@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2463 Correction Comment 1: An archaeological survey and assessment is required since the eastern portion of the site is located within an area designated as having a high potential of containing archaeological artifacts. The survey shall be prepared pursuant to Section 2.03.07.E.2 of the Land Development Code. The applicant has submitted a waiver from providing a survey and assessment. This waiver requires approval by the Preservation Board. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Review: School District Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach for Amy Lockhart Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 1: Review comments will be provided as soon as they are available. Response: This comment is acknowledged. Review: Transportation Planning Review Reviewed By: Michael Sawyer Email: michael.sawyer@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2926 Correction Comment 1: Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Operations Review: Rev.2: Collier County maintains and updates the annual growth rates for each roadway segment monitored. The annual growth rates are updated each year and can be found in the 2024 AUIR Excel master spreadsheet. Please update the growth rates in Exhibit 5 to be consistent with the growth rates found in the 2024 AUIR. Please note that the AUIR growth rates reflect the minimum 2% growth rate required and have also been adjusted for reasonableness, with the maximum growth rate typically at 4%. Staff will email a copy of the 2024 AUIR Excel master spreadsheet containing the growth rate estimates to use for the requested changes. Rev.1:Verify the growth percentages listed in Exhibit 5 are consistent with the 2024 AUIR. For example, link 34.0 is listed in the AUIR with a growth rate of 2%, but it is listed in Exhibit 5 with 4%. Also, verify all calculations in Exhibit 5 are correct. For example, the 2030 background volumes using the growth rate method for links 96.0 and 97.0 should correctly be 282 and 259, respectively, but Exhibit 5 shows these volumes as 250 and 240, respectively. Response: Exhibit 5 of the TIS has been revised to reference the 2024 AUIR Excel Master Spreadsheet as requested by the reviewer. Note: no changes in significant impacts or roadway deficiencies resulted from the updated traffic volumes. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 2 of 4 Page 730 of 745 Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 10: PUD Exhibit C: Please add the minimum landscape buffers to the Master Plan. Review 2: A 10-foot wide Type A Landscape Buffer is required along the southeast property line. Please provide it. Response: Exhibit C has been updated to indicate the required landscape buffers in response to this comment. Exhibit F has been updated to include language regarding preserve areas and landscape buffers as recommended by Staff. Correction Comment 12: PUD Exhibit C: Please show the amount of Open Space provided. Review 2: Please provide the required 60% Open Space. (It is recommended that the LDC definition of open space be viewed to determine what qualifies as open space.) Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment to indicate that at least 60 percent of the gross area shall be provided as usable open space. Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Email: heidi.ashton@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-8773 Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: Why does the survey show a 7.13 to 7.18 foot gap (parcel 2) between the subject parcel and the right-of-way line? Do you have an easement for access over this gap area? (The Master Plan proposes access to parcel 2) Response: The gap area in question is located within the property lines; the property is contiguous with the Right -of -Way (ROW). The 7.13' and 7.18' dimensions shown on the survey are describing the distance between the approximate top of bank (T.O.B.) of the canal to the property line. The line delineating the approximate top of bank is a physical feature rather than a legal property boundary or a gap in ownership. No easement should be necessary for access because the subject parcel abuts the ROW directly. Correction Comment 4: Miscellaneous Corrections: How do you arrive at 12 units an acre? What density bonuses are you using? (Base is 3 dwelling units per acre; proposed density is 12 units per acre.) Response: The property is a combined 4.04 acres. At a base density of 3 dwelling units per acre, the project is allowed a total density of 12 units (4.04 acres * 3 units/acre). Correction Comment 5: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please address my comments and requested changes per my 12-29-25 review of the PUD document [Exhibits A-F], to be provided by email by County staff. Response: The PUD document [Exhibits A-F] have been updated in response to the requested changes. Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 3 of 4 Page 731 of 745 Rejected Review: Landscape Review Reviewed By: Nancy Gundlach Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 2: Please provide the required 10' wide Type A Landscape Buffer along the southeast property line. Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. Correction Comment 3: Please remove the "No Buffer Required" notes. The buffers are required. Response: Exhibit C has been updated in response to this comment. We respectfully request your review and approval of this application. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Karim Ismail Project Manager ProudHouse Builders LLC 923 Del Prado Blvd Ste 205 Cape Coral, FL 33990-3628 Tel: 407-990-2880 Email: karimOblueprintpal.com Copperstone Estates RPUD - PL20250009053 (January 16, 2026) Page 4 of 4 Page 732 of 745 Deven Long From: Michael Sawyer <Michael.Sawyer@collier.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2025 3:16 PM To: Deven Long; karim@blueprntpal.com Subject: Copperstone Estates/Eaglecrest Rezone, PL2025-9053 Attachments: AUIR MASTER Attachment F-2024 Excel w tabs 12.17.2024.xlsm Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, Deven, Regarding the TIS review for you Copperstone Estates/Eaglecrest Rezone project. Attached is the 2024 AUIR Excel master spreadsheet to use in updating the growth rates in your TIS as requested. Please let us know of any follow-up questions. Happy Holidays, respectfully, Michael Sawyer Project Manager II Transportation Management Services Department Transportation Planning Michael. sawyerkcolliercountyfl. gov Michael Sawyer Project Manager II Transportation Engineering Office:239-252-2926 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Michael.Sawyer(cb-collier.gov My email address has changed. Effective immediately, please update your contact list to use this new address: Michael.Sawyer(a-)_collier.gov Collier Count 10 110100a Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Page 733 of 745 Deven Long From: Craig Brown <Craig.Brown@collier.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 5:17 PM To: Nancy Gundlach; Justin Ebrite Cc: Heidi Ashton; Deven Long Subject: RE: Copperstone Estates PUD PL20250009053 Justin, I would like to support what Nancy has stated, you need to select and consolidate the preservation area for this project. Let me know if you have any questions. thanks Craig Brown Manager - Environmental Services Development Review Office:239-252-2548 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Craig. Brown(@collier.gov My email address has changed. Effective immediately, please update your contact list to use this new address: Craig. Brown(a�collier.gov From: Nancy Gundlach <Nancy.Gundlach@collier.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:55 PM To: Justin Ebrite <JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com> Cc: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@collier.gov>; Deven Long <Dlong@PatriotEngCo.com>; Craig Brown <Craig.Brown @collier.gov> Subject: RE: Copperstone Estates PUD PL20250009053 Hi Justin, Collier Count [IM000 We would not support a deviation from the required perimeter landscape buffers. The LDC does not support "picture frame" preservation areas. I also noticed an inconsistency in the amount of Preservation Area required on the Master Plan. Could you please correct that? I am copying Craig Brown, as he is the subject matter expert. Page 734 of 745 If you would like to add some language to the wider buffer area in the northeast corner of the site, the following language may be appropriate: PRESIF-I MAY ft WED TO -SArtJ!SF;Y TWE LA-N a PIE EUEFEFt RECUIRE 'JENTS 4,06,05 E.I. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS VOTM NATIVE r3LANT MATERIALS SKALL 9E REQUIREME ITT$. A 6 fOOT "DE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION NAS SEEM III REQUIREI IE I TS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SLI PP F;ME NITAL PLANTING WI' BU FFER F EDU IRE M ENTS . TKE TYPE, SIZE, AND INUMBER Qf SQC H PLAN-n ,l , IF � LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OFF PLAT. Respectfully, Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, CSM Planner III Zoning Services Division (239)252-2484 Nancy.Gundlach@collier.gov 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 C;0*67 Cm=ftty Nancy Gundlach Planner III Zoning Office:239-252-2484 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Nancy. Gundlach(a)collier.gov My email address has changed. Effective immediately, please update your contact list to use this new address: Nancy.Gundlach(@colIier.gov From: Justin Ebrite <JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:21 PM To: Nancy Gundlach <Nancy.Gundlach@collier.gov> Cc: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@collier.gov>; Deven Long <Dlong@PatriotEngCo.com> Subject: Copperstone Estates PUD PL202SO009053 _d) Collier Count 1101808 Page 735 of 745 This email was sent to your old CollierCountyFL.gov email address. Please contact the sender to change to your new email domain @Collier.gov EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Nancy, I hope all is well , I wanted to review the current comment below, I may reach out about the other comments as well but we will keep each email comment specific. Email: nancy.gundlach@Collier.Gov Phone #: (239) 252-2484 Correction Comment 10: PUD Exhibit C: Please add the minimum landscape buffers to the Master Plan. Review 2: A 10-foot-wide Type A Landscape Buffer is required along the southeast property line. Please provide it. You and Heidi provided comments regarding the buffers in the preserve and the note indicating no buffer is required, which requested the removal of those callouts and notes. Although we have handled this differently in the past, I understand the rationale for including such notes in case the preserve layout changes during development. My question to the staff is whether we can revise note 2 on the master plan to state: "Where required landscape or development buffers overlap designated Native Preserves, the Native Preserve shall satisfy the buffer requirement, provided all applicable buffer functions and dimensional criteria are met." Alternatively, does this revision need to be made in the deviation section as mentioned in the attorney's comments? This revision to the note simply reinforces the current county code, but I want to ensure there is no ambiguity or room for interpretation. Your feedback would be greatly appreciated. Justin Ebrite President / Project Manager Patriot Engineering Company "AV Cell: 239-248-7300 Phone: 239-308-0099 EAT 101 Email: JEbrite(cDPatriotEnaCo.com 780 5`h Ave S. I Suite# 200 Naples, FL 34102 www.PatriotEngineeringCompany.com in Book time to meet with me Happy with our services? Leave us a review!" Page 736 of 745 Deven Long From: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@collier.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:44 PM To: Deven Long Cc: Justin Ebrite Subject: RE: PUD Rezone PL20250009053, Copperstone Estates RPUD Review Letter GAP AREA ON MASTER PLAN Deven, I am at the Board of County Commissioners meeting today. Your explanation below satisfies my comment. Thank you! Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8773 Note new email: heidi.ashton@collier.gov From: Deven Long <Dlong@PatriotEngCo.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:38 PM To: Heidi Ashton <Heidi.Ashton@collier.gov> Cc: Justin Ebrite <JEbrite@PatriotEngCo.com> Subject: PUD Rezone PL20250009053, Copperstone Estates RPUD Review Letter 2 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Heidi, I called your office earlier and left a message, but I wanted to follow up via email to provide context regarding a specific review comment: Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: Why does the survey show a 7.13 to 7.18 foot gap (parcel 2) between the subject parcel and the right-of-way line? Do you have an easement for access over this gap area? (The Master Plan proposes access to parcel 2) Here is a screenshot of the survey for reference: Page 737 of 745 �o• Z �QU&- 6 A* Q ti &"q- Al oe �Cro _�`• S'A . C, o� rs,� r8� 'Lq `Tp „U00 . �o?o ao 0,71? 0, -1ORF � SJ ' These dimensions are describing distance between the property line and the Top of Bank (T.O.B.) - The Top of Bank line is not a legal boundary R ,,. O p�sFTo A 4, 4o FND. 5/8' Based on the survey, I believe there may be a misunderstanding of the linework. The gap area in question is located within the property lines; the property is contiguous with the Right -of -Way (ROW). The light blue line identified in the survey represents the canal's top of bank, which is a physical feature rather than a legal property boundary or a gap in ownership. Because the subject parcel abuts the ROW directly, no easement should be necessary for access. Could you please verify if this clarification addresses your concern? I am happy to hop on a quick call if it would be easier to discuss. Thank you for your time and help, Deven Long, PE Vice President / Project Manager Patriot Engineering Company Veteran Owned and Operated Phone: 239-308-0099 EBR# 37157 Mobile: 239-851-7388 Fax: 239-308-4750 Email: DLong cDPatriotEngCo.com 780 5th Ave S. I Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 www.PatriotEngineeringCompany.com T @) in 4 Page 738 of 745 CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES As president and CEO of BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Mr. Stejskal is responsible for all management duties of the firm and project coordination. The clients Mr. Stejskal works with include both the private and public sectors with a primary focus on Lee, Charlotte, Hendry, Collier, Glades, Desoto, Highlands, and Sarasota Counties. Besides the corporate responsibilities, as a consultant and ecologist, Mr. Stejskal is responsible for coordination of environmental permitting, conducting wildlife surveys, wetland delineations, and other environmental reports. He also has been qualified as an expert in wetland and wildlife ecology and environmental land use in both Lee, Collier, and Hendry County. Mr. Stejskal had also previously carried a certification as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Since 2003, Mr. Stejskal has managed projects, conducted fieldwork, and produced reports and applications for land use planning and development. These projects include due diligence assessments for land acquisition purposes, assistance with environmental site planning, coordination over permitting and mitigation design for wetlands and wildlife, and compliance monitoring of projects, both during and after construction. Mr. Stejskal has received certification from the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) in ARC GIS I & II, as well as additional training on gopher tortoise permitting and relocations from the Ashton Biodiversity Institute. PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE o Ajax US 17 & State Road 29: Audubon's crested caracara, sandhill crane, Big Cypress fox squirrel nest survey and observation for the Florida Department of Transportation in Glades County. o Arlington Commerce Park: Wetland and ecological permitting for a mixed -use development with red -cockaded woodpecker permitting in Lee County. o Colonial/Ortiz: Wetland, ecological, and wildlife permitting for the red -cockaded woodpecker and the big cypress fox squirrel for a medical office development along with wetland monitoring in Lee County. o Sonoma Preserve: Wetland impact and mitigation design for a commercial mixed -use golf course community, with gopher tortoise and scrub jay permitting in Desoto County. o North Fort Myers Restoration: Permitting and construction coordination for a hydrological and ecological restoration project in Lee County. o Cook -Brown Mine: A large mining project in Charlotte County that involved in-depth impact assessments, as well as both environmental and wetland permitting for the existing mine expansion project. Barrett Stejskal President, CEO, Consultant, & Ecologist Experience: o 25+ Years of Environmental Experience Focusing in Lee, Charlotte, Hendry, Collier, Glades, Desoto, Highlands, and Sarasota Counties Education: o Florida Gulf Coast University, BA, 2003 Environmental Studies & Biology Previous Professional Affiliations: o Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals o Lee County Conservation Land Acquisition and Stewardship Advisory Committee Certification: o FWC —Former Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent Permit #: GTA-09-0002OF o Autodesk AutoCAD Certification AutoCAD Training Courses o Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)—ARC GIS I & II Areas of Expertise: o Ecological Sciences — Wetland & Wildlife Ecology o Audubon's Crested Caracara Monitoring & Observations o Gopher Tortoise Surveys, Relocations, & Excavations o Sandhill Crane Nest Surveys & Species Monitoring o Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Utilizing ACAD, GIS & GPS o Wetland Permitting and Mitigation o ACOE, DEP, and State Wetland Delineations o Impact Assessments o Wildlife Surveys and Species Relocations o Wildlife Habitat Management Planning and Permitting o Habitat Restoration and Mitigation Design o Environmental Land Use Permitting and Rezoning o Local, State, and Federal Environmental Permitting o Post Permit Compliance and Monitoring Contact Information: Barrett Stejskal President, CEO, Consultant, & Ecologist BearPaws Environmental Consulting 1599 Covington Circle East Fort Myers Florida 33919 Phone: (239) 340-0678 Email: bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com Website: http://www.bearpawsenvconsulting.com rage 1,5y oT 140 CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES As vice president of BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Mrs. Stejskal is responsible for all financial duties of the firm. The clients Mrs. Stejskal works with include both the private and public sectors. Besides the corporate responsibilities, also as a consultant and ecologist, Mrs. Stejskal is responsible for assisting in the efforts of environmental permitting, conducting wildlife surveys, wetland delineations, and other environmental reports. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mrs. Stejskal has managed projects, conducted fieldwork, and produced reports and applications for land use planning and development. These projects include due diligence assessments for land acquisition purposes, assistance with environmental land planning, coordination on permitting and mitigation design for wetlands and wildlife, and compliance monitoring of projects during and after construction. Previous experience also includes working with Lee County as an intern, while attending Florida Gulf Coast University, in their Environmental Sciences Division. In addition, she has received certification from the Richard Chinn U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation and Management Training Program and gopher tortoise Natural History, Relocation, and Management program offered by Ray Ashton. She also has been qualified as an expert in wetland and wildlife ecology in Lee County. PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE o Bell Road Mine: Big cypress fox squirrel, rezoning, and DEP permitting for a mine in Lee County. o Chapel Creek: Bald eagle, gopher tortoise and wetland permitting for a mixed use development in Lee County. o Fichter's Creek Restoration: Crested caracara, gopher tortoise, restoration design, and wetland permitting for a restoration project in Lee County. o Hendry -Labelle Regional Park: Impact assessment for a park project in Hendry County. o Panther Mine Expansion: Impact assessment and permitting for a mine expansion in Charlotte County. o Portofino Vineyards: Protected species survey, cabbage palm survey, and gopher tortoise relocation for a residential development in Lee County. o Three Oaks Parkway Extension: Protected species survey, wetland permitting for a roadway project in Lee County. Christina Stejskal Vice -President, CFO, Consultant, & Ecologist Experience: o 20+Years of Environmental Experience Education: o Florida Gulf Coast University, BA, 2003 Environmental Studies Professional Affiliations: o Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals o Ecological Society of America Areas of Expertise: o Ecological Sciences o Gopher Tortoise Surveys & Relocations o Audubon's Crested Caracara Monitoring & Observations o Sandhill Crane Nest Surveys & Species Monitoring o Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Utilizing AutoCAD & GPS o Wetland Permitting and Mitigation o Corps and State Wetland Delineations o Impact Assessments o Wildlife Surveys and Species Relocations o Wildlife Habitat Management Planning and Permitting o Habitat Restoration and Mitigation Design o Environmental Land Use Permitting and Rezoning o Local, State, and Federal Environmental Permitting o Post Permit Compliance and Monitoring Contact Information: Christina Stejskal Vice President, CFO, Consultant, & Ecologist BearPaws Environmental Consulting 1599 Covington Circle East, Fort Myers, FL 33919 Phone: (239) 560-8441 Email: bearpawsenvconsulting@gmail.com christina@bearpawsenv.com Website: http://www.bearpawsenvconsulting.com Page 740 of 745 Collier County School District AriCt Schoo/ School Impact Analysis Application Inshuctinns Submit one copy of completer) appllr,atlon and lorahrm map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impart to the Planning Department of d the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all TV applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Qom, �� Department at 239-377-0267. Collier C0 Please check [-\7 type of application request (one only): HSchool Capacity Review F-I Exemption Letter Concurrencv Determination = Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, I. Project Information: Project Name:: t-1-Estates Municipality: Naples Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00724880001 & 00724520002 Location,'Address Of subject property: North of Tamiami Trail East, approximately 3200ft east of Collier Blvd. (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: Tamiami Trail East and Collier Boulevard II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner'Contract Purchaser Name(s): Ate' AwanPr Aho a svvers Aoent'Contact Person: Karim Ismail )Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 923 Del Prado Blvd, Ste 205. Cape Coral, FL 33990 Telephone#-. =0-990-2880 Fax: Emailkarim@blueprintpal.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 2025-12-30 Owner or Authonzed Agent Signature Date III. Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Aa ricu ltu ral Proposed Land Use Designation: R P U D Current Zoning ricu Itu ral Proposed Zoning:Copperstone Estates RPUD Project Acreage: Unit T SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: O t,� , Total Units Proposed by Type: 12 Is this a phased project: Yes of No ) If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date time stamp: 2025-12-30 Page 741 of 745 Project Location COPPERSTONE ESTATES RPUD EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of 176,000.78 square feet (4.040 acres) and is comprised of the following parcels: Parcel ID: 00724880001 & 0072452002. The legal description of the property is as follows: PARCEL 1: Part of the North 1/2 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the East 1/4 corner of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, run with the West line of said Section 3, South 00 degrees 41'31" West, a distance of 612.2 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18'29" West, a distance of 722.3 feet to the intersection of the West right of way line of the County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road 90 (Tamiami Trail); thence with said right of way of State Road 90, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 227.51 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing with said right of way, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'46" East, a distance of 400 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400 feet to the Point of Beginning. /_l01I07 PARCEL 2: A parcel of land lying in Section 3, township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the said Southeast 1/4 run South, with the Section line, a distance of 612.6 feet, thence Westward, perpendicular to the Section line, a distance of 722.3 feet, to the intersection of the West right of way line of a County Drainage Canal with the North right of way line of State Road #90 (Tamiami trail); thence with the Trail right of way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 447.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence, continuing with the Trail right of Way line, North 54 degrees 20'16" West, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39'44" East, a distance of 400.0 feet; thence South 54 degrees 20'16" East, a distance of 220.0 feet; thence South 35 degrees 39'44" West, a distance of 400.0 feet to the Point of Beginning. Copperstone Estates RPUD — PL20250009053 (November 20, 2025) Page 4 of 7 Page 743 of 745 SIGN POSTING 1'VST>tttr-r= (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVFWPMEMT) A Toning sig►t(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitIone r'a agent on the parucI for a minimum of fifteen ( 15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must he ntnintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however those guideline; should not he construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For Teciric sign rerluirernenta, please refer In the Administrative Cede, Chapter R E. I. The sign(s) must he erected in full view of the public, nol more than rive (5l feet from the nearest street right -of --way or easement. 2. The �ign(s) must he securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a woad panel and Then fastened securely tk� a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 1 The petitioner or the petitionrrr's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested Action has been heard and a final decision rendcred. If the sigh(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the perittoncr's agent must replace the signts NOTE: AFTER T`HF SIGN IIAS BEEN POSTED, T1I11S AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE. FIRST HFARIN. G DATE TO THE ASSIGNED FLAN-NER. AFFIDAVIT OF M?STrNQ NOTICE STATE Of FLOR1DA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO ON OATH SAWS THAT HFJSHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTTt7N i tt.f13.W OF THE COLLIFR COENTY LAND DFVEI.OPMFNT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBF'R PL 012 000 E 3 �1 �r� ��•.l ���� gas SIGMA OF APP ANT OR AGENT STREET OR P. . BOX �...�,� AP _oil '&AmF. (TYPED OR PRi IVI ED) 9 e-11C� C <�#'r0, CH" . FrATU ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF� --" [► e-e— 4 Clay a `'�'` ���►hy Tbc foregoing instrument was sworn to arxd suhxcritred before me this as id%nuirwation O+L. '5t�~Arsoplaily known to t►le or whn produced and to didtdid not take an oath. at of Nuiluy I'ub rC Holary PC Slots of Florid t� Sarah L Santora { 1.-� � C.� (—V Illl My (rOmmlaoloh 04H 537430It - Expires 6116)2e28 pruned Manta of Not Public My 0marmission Exprrrbs e'wl1 O 1,- 13 iSlalmp with serial number) Rev. 3/412015 Page 744 of 745 '�+k:t k :F : x' }xr. l--#, ['p�� f F,�kr� y2• ► '' ''K4-#�� ti ..r �I } R: y._ { T, # kC-'.�� _ti y,, `'y,�,� M r,' , �•. ,,, t• r�' Y; j ter, i j,fyy�i ,•„i:#. _ y y L4 ' ' a£+'} '� iy 7 +.�• �F �_ �ti �'' f :•' � ' � ' % '��� �, F'� _ _ _ - + k �� � �f _ �•' � 7.�' -`fi• � � � i cif a S ri�'rY� �. � � r �.�y _ •�f'7 � r"Jh. �Jr, ,.�'... � '1 - � - �,� �"� _��� � .I c?ryr�.•� � _ �# ��:'��••. 5f"hr+ rsw , F'' � �' •'f 5 . r � i1+w; •iF ri' _ , 1�r� r' � •*:��. J .4 5 L� 'i � _ •ram h, i4-• •Y•�:Y i'�}4 � ' d ���' + Tti � rY7, '�' �+ ti T'_ �i'# r' !.' 2�,- , {' '�, �L� •.i '�i',R .-ir-, , � i� �},r `�F }��� t�� rF�9;.s1 .w� - '.�; 'i.V. �.� ��` Lt� r' � F J, \ `�' _ r f•-'S - •�f`,�' J(`� �r �.,' .i r±i� �� :w� -r '��" "t _ �- 5. k. •. '�k, � fir-' •IFh,', e.+4.'.,�-r �+ I ;`' . `:k'4.. , �+: .:1; � °'k. � +.iJ� 5}r r'�.• •'r! ; _=�i �Y �'a.. �� �'` `k� �' � ~�4. .x ''F?'� .1?,".+z� _Y , �`i "' r•?`'+ .Y.� �„}_ F. 'J ,-,; � .. -r^ S _ �' -1 ' � .* ,may 3 � 4 � +� .f � ! 'x ' J r: . •tr ' xii,� _ r• �' � ''r rti', .. �' - 'T' 'J ` ,. '.,Y*'r .4 .k . *.* •'[ _ _ ' .� �'� ' } ." i-� f!'v_4'x... n+f•, 'ip - ! _ 41 J # : �" + _,if J •�' is 1.. 7 5 +� ? l v { �� �j�"rr .yr '}:w ; * �'x �.�= "rr � 1" '7�'. ftt. -h..'.F. � ■• y, - J `' y .x '}' r �M1 ay.1#-'''j.t'•.,•'`rr' _ 'I•ir, _ .J+ r *-.r, � .:t� 'I-�� -�"�i '!'�}, .�v. .� t'J�, �? � � F,rc'*'� :N[xr'{ '�a ++ 5 - 'r l.r !._Sri. __ _ .� �: �� _ �"��.!'• '�'_ � - -"�{�,, 'y4�`,�J.+ �[ �. f.. � ,. � •� �P�,ra ++;�� �� 1 '.r�[1�+- �3i � .+'�f-,r''� .1::�1.:�,5,� '.!� til'„� ��Sr`'It' � f ] f �'-, k �� �.�x - 's }�.�•'. �T'��'� � � fYh I �5 �f�'y� {!+rir 1!'bl r. 71 " � � .��•k� . .r- 'r'��,} �'`'; '151'��.� 4 �.} •. ,.I #f1 ./� �. � * 1� � �, -� f J• .I Iti. ' - 'i -JI •'.. ,,}� .FV f,'Gr• ~ { r.•' Icr'` •*r - ! '�wJy 'T `1�` • t}]I- rl�"r il+' �1 {�i 4 h{ I s' i,• :''\. S 2 + t rT .ir �} I 3 1 .'+lI+,�lr ,F{{ - � _ -y . f , :+' .�- +Y'�5 �}. { 'S f� - 5, ,� 1' .f ',� - "f� � - •f. ii' y R , -_ y '; .i! � + 1' � �.,, t F} 4..�[k.. . ,� {-� T�' - #�rl.' J .3v r. f-•� tit- { �Y :.'F'. �'. } , - ` .-. - - - T?' -.y -�1 '. . „ii,'. +i - _ I' I' r�{. _ ti .5' ;_ 1 ' 'i ti . 4 _M#`'Fi` iJ _ S.yr,l.�µ. J}�`_ }/� '-±;_-+1�:1�_ .4_. 0. - }I'� f•r+J y 1 J § {1 S i l J '.4' r'I'. • f I•^ . +rf-' r a rr. ;:_� •� ~ S' #: 1 y ;L 7 - i.4- I 1 + r1: �i T,*'C .5'• , '� ft+ .114 ' _*t t� - .+'`, .3y+r k }' �.. 1 +'i '' rF�.� i"'' .} '�5 r• �I} f'..'�. .�Y� -T t" "' } • 'tif y • • ' h 7 h x ' .. f 4 h • , _ _ _ r./ , .'� L h ti 1 • S �' . ' }l " �J• _ i � � ria#' ( +r � _ � - � 8 '�t4 :4 w ��'.' �� } • k } � ��f .h _ ����� y. ` � r� . .5 �,� - � � {y .... '-sue ?�..• '. .'�' � '� J �.-` � �' �" .. r , f � } IY' .#� 4�'+. '4.r il. -• � .'�: � x r r � _ ,�.', }•�, -. J �. r4,.. r, '� . -c . � r:y: y� ;�,'�- }c� �4. � r � l x -•?' /'� k•,> - '- � �• � J rim � � - : rJ - '� i� jj r •r �_ � � '�F �' z�.1 �� '� f f��`!. i ��` �. �. - ��'%�'�._ • .. -� r� F,r}, .� �i .,'_Y'' { I �, .� -. � � .r' + � '� �i '�*r��.}�r.x - - '' �+ �- +r.�'S �.� � �. ./ � � .' - . +C�� r ir. �_ . L _ . r ' +i� r .. � a _ �' •' � � .ir� . 4 � . °��r� r•Fj4. ' r[�(� } a. yi,,�.- � � . J t ' ' � .,ate .� �' ' .f yT. i Y-'•} hl r'i-7 . * l ' rf 4x" yr[ tiA _ { I — W.F, � ,��' � •�1- '�'r '�� _ *5�" �'I'. i� ��y r { � h' - .. F J ..J'+ �� �'��'�, 3 .i-r �[� . +. - � .. � - �• �1 � _ � .'�' �.��.' , �+_ ��,\;.pit+ 'i - _ _ .r{�ii�. � ��k �_ y .1 � -� �r• �.., � • r PUBLIC r� [�z.`i*'...•%,`(PetitionM III * PC + J�-�r^ J .yyh F k z •. - a� f i r BCC: May 26, 202 Board of County Cornmiss�anprs Meeting Room ff r 3299 East Tam t '_. -tiq ' , °'-* {k..�■4,•M1iI=RFi"} '`. '* i ri�` r - �.fi I y ,�'. `_ • # + + F' � I fA; h' J i .! + - �s _'� h.� 3- ,�� � r ���I` I` i 1 r �, �.I, I� 1 •�• % i i .�. �l�� {''t _ �* ik j. � � k � - �� ' , r - pry .' #> ' •�r` - � - I' . i T �.• '•`"r'�'4 ,� . ��+� r4 - � { - Y� ��' �'� r:�7r ,.Y''.�R" �r: ;:`�'.�,'. ,,�. , r^Y�' i.5't.§� � - y# i,{�i - -L. -,'.: ;i:. •-:r.5" z+pf'rry_. .�� � - r+'�~'�'.�'•-�;�•� .�rt�.,':•- .'y�. .r.r•.. �4 - ,r�' 'i7{��:�-?�. --- i` - - +- :t + ryF, lJ 4x:.'.� L. "''ti'_r'*y '••.'}Y'r •' ;,--';,,, ..�." ;. ��=1 -�F .r•##�- J' '7C� .a,y � _ -�.r �-;�` a �.��"" �.I ',f'f-..�, '� �.i.Y �+�i..� i:yitiV:i� .f}yk��:+' .;Y.:��+.._,'.,�. +',k '�' ':J;hl-•'.rl - + '�••'?t�=:��'-?F-is�7'�i�';s.•i:.��i+-a'�.'�`.#�,r'F<.+�•:,d: '.3"�.fi �{�r'�=�'F' r' Y_aL�{�_�yYi•I�;,.��..rw�' ;'�''� �'�."^*5�:'�r`rV.