Loading...
BCC Minutes 09/20/2012 B (Budget) BCC BUDGET MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 September 20, 2012 TRANSCRIPT OF THE SECOND BUDGET MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida September 20, 2012 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 5:05 p.m. in BUDGET SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: Fred Coyle Jim Coletta Donna Fiala Tom Henning Georgia Hiller ALSO PRESENT: Leo E. Ochs, Jr., County Manager Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Mark, Isackson, OMB Director Ian Mitchell, Executive Manager to BCC Page 1 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRAB) Airport Authority � . vt, � , r Azoido. fit AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 BUDGET SESSION September 20, 2012 5:05 PM Fred W. Coyle - BCC Chairman; Commissioner, District 4 Jim Coletta - BCC Vice-Chairman; Commissioner, District 5; CRAB Chairman Donna Fiala - BCC Commissioner, District 1; CRAB Vice-Chairman Georgia Hiller - BCC Commissioner, District 2 Tom Henning - BCC Commissioner, District 3 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. Page 1 September 20,2012 IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3335 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 1, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING— Collier County FY 2012-13 Budget A. Discussion of FY 2012-13 Millage Rates and Increases Over the Rolled Back Millage Rates B. Discussion of Further Amendments to the Tentative Budget C. Public Comments and Questions D. Public Reading of the Taxing Authority Levying Millage, the Name of the Taxing Authority, the Rolled-Back Rate, the Percentage Increase, and the Millage Rate to be Levied. E. Adoption of Resolution Setting Millage Rates. Note: A separate motion is required for the Dependent District millage rates; and a separate motion is required for the remaining millage rates. F. Resolution to Adopt the Final Budget by Fund. Note: a separate motion is required for the Dependent District budgets; and a separate motion is required for the remaining budgets. 3. ADJOURN Page 2 September 20,2012 September 20, 2012 MR. OCHS: Mr. Chairman, you have a live mic. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Ladies and gentlemen, Board of County Commission meeting is now in session. Would you please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay. COMMISSIONER FIALA: I'm glad we don't have to sing. CHAIRMAN COYLE: You want to sing? COMMISSIONER FIALA: No, I said I'm glad we don't have to sing like at a Kiwanis Club. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Oh, okay. Well, I'm glad you're not going to sing. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yeah, I don't blame you. CHAIRMAN COYLE: County Manager, it's all yours. MR. OCHS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good evening, Commissioners. Welcome to the second of your two statutorily required public hearings to adopt the fiscal 2012-2013 county budget. Mr. Mitchell is available to take public speakers. If anyone wants to register to speak at the appropriate time, they can register with Mr. Mitchell. With that, Commissioners, I'll turn this to Mr. Isackson. MR. ISACKSON: Thank you, County Manager Ochs. Good evening, Commissioners. If you'll bear with me, there's a number of things I have to put on record, part of TRIM requirements, for the final public budget hearing. Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, members of the audience, those watching on Collier television, welcome to the final public budget hearing on Collier County's fiscal year 2013 budget, which runs from October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 200 governing the Annual Truth-in-Millage Process, an advertisement for this hearing was published in Naples Daily News on Monday, September 17th, 2012. Page 2 September 20, 2012 This hearing date was also announced at the first public budget hearing September 6, 2012 and was contained in Resolution 2012-136, approving tentative millage rates as the maximum millage rates passed by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th of July, 2012. Agenda and speaker sign-up slips are available in the hallway. You must register if you wish to address the Board of County Commissioners regarding the county budget. Mr. Ian Mitchell will take speaker slips. Following some introductory remarks regarding tax rates and any changes to the tentative budget initially submitted to the Board of County Commissioners on July 17th, 2012, and subsequently amended at the first hearing of September 6, 2012, it will bring an opportunity under Item 2.0 on the agenda for public comment. Speakers will be called by name. Item #2A DISCUSSION OF FY 2012-13 MILLAGE RATES AND INCREASES OVER THE ROLLED BACK MILLAGE RATES — DISCUSSED Item 2.A on the agenda is discussion of the fiscal year 2012-13 millage rates and increases over the rolled-back millage rates. State law requires that the first substantive issues to be discussed are: Number one, percentage increase in the millage over the rolled-back rate needed to fund the-budget; and two, the reasons ad valorem tax revenues above the rolled-back rate as calculated on the State DR420 forms are being increased. Rolled-back rate is defined as that tax rate necessary to generate prior year tax revenues, and this tax is calculated, not including taxable values associated with new construction, additions, deletions and rehabilitative improvements. Page 3 September 20, 2012 The Board adopted budget guidance for FY 2013 included a millage neutral position for the general fund and the unincorporated area general fund, which together represent 91 percent of the total aggregate taxes levied across all Collier County taxing authorities. Fiscal year 2013 amended tentative general fund and unincorporated area general fund budgets as presented are based upon a millage neutral tax rate. Neither of the substantive discussion topics mentioned above applies to fiscal year 2013 Collier County budget based upon TRIM statutory definition of an ad valorem tax or increase above the rolled-back rate. Referring to Exhibit 2-A, each Collier County taxing authority, exclusive of debt service, exclusive of voter approved millage rates for operating in debt, and exclusive of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit, Collier County Lighting MSTU, Rock Road MSTU, Haldeman Creek Dredging MSTU and the Golden Gate Community Center MSTU has proposed a millage rate either at the rolled-back rate or below the rolled-back rate. Budget guidance provided millage neutral tax rate positions would be taken in the general fund and unincorporated area general fund. Further, MSTU tax rates would be set between millage neutral and tax neutral, based on respective advisory board recommendations. The cumulative aggregate rolled-back tax rate for all of Collier County taxing authorities, exclusive of debt service, totals 4.3459 per $1,000 of taxable value. The proposed aggregate tax rate for all Collier County taxing authorities, exclusive of debt service, totals 4.3214 per $1,000 of taxable value. This represents a decrease of .56 percent. No changes to the millage rates, as tentatively on September 6, 2012 first public budget hearing are proposed. Page 4 September 20, 2012 Item #2B DISCUSSION OF FURTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE TENTATIVE BUDGET — DISCUSSED Commissioners, the next item is 2.B, a discussion of further amendments to the tentative budget. Staff has proposed no further amendments to the amended tentative budget adopted by the Board at the first public hearing on September 6th, 2012. And Commissioners, that concludes my remarks under 2.B. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, that brings us to public comments and questions. Do we have any speakers? MR. OCHS: Commissioners, I'm sorry, before you take public comment, if I could at this time, it would be appropriate I believe to follow up with two items that the Board asked the staff to look into at the first public hearing that was held two weeks ago. As the Board will recall there was general expression from the Board of support for a $300,000 request from the David Lawrence Center to help fund the expanded Baker Act facility that they have built. And secondly, there seemed to be general support also for an allocation to complete the fire station at the Port of the Isles Station so that we can get that fire company out of the hotel that they've been lodged in for far too long. Staff would recommend that we make no changes to your budget this evening but that if the Board is predisposed to move favorably on those two items, that we bring back an executive summary at your regular board meeting in October and provide some options to fund both of those projects. And then the Board can choose from among those options that we bring forward to you. Page 5 September 20, 2012 It will result in no increase to your budget that you would adopt tonight and no increase in your millage. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, so bottom line is you believe you can accommodate both of those requests without changing any of the millage rates? MR. OCHS: Correct. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay. Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Yes, I support that. You need that in the form of a motion or just nods of the head? MR. OCHS: No, I don't need it as a motion, sir. I just wanted to mention that as follow-up to the Board's discussion on those two items at the last hearing. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: The reserves going into the fiscal year and needing the capital dollars for the start-up, where are we at? Are we going to have to do mid-year amendments? MR. OCHS: I'll let Mark take you through that scenario, sir. MR. ISACKSON: Commissioner, I -- obviously when we contemplate mid-year cuts, we don't do that lightly. And it's really all about trying to establish our beginning cash position in the general fund. As you know, we have done mid-year cuts over the last few years. I take stock of that in December, generally, once I know what my beginning audited cash position in the general fund is. And from that point then I begin to seriously look at whether or not we need midyear cuts or not. If-- County Manager's blessing, we can come back to the Board with a discussion on that topic, if that's the Board's desire. But I can't sit here and tell you right now if I'm going to do that or not. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay, we know what our expenses are going to be based upon the budget. So all you're relying on is revenues that come in, and there's assumption on the revenues? Page 6 September 20, 2012 MR. ISACKSON: Well, if we -- in its simplest terms, if I -- the benchmark is $50 million that I have to start the year with in the general fund, for example. And I know that my reserves going in to '13 are 24 million. And if I spent everything that I took in, my beginning cash would be $24 million. So when you start looking at a decision on whether you're going to make mid-year cuts or not, I have revenue that come in over expenses because we budget very conservatively on the revenue side. And if I have to force the expense side down, that's what the mid-year cuts do in order to get me above that 24 million base on reserves to that $50 million benchmark that we look at. Because we've got quite a bit of money going out the first quarter of the FY. So I won't know that really, Commissioner, until, as I said, around December is when I starting making -- we make those decisions internally. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. But your anticipated -- like you said, you budgeted conservatively on the revenue. MR. ISACKSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So you're saying that's pretty solid then. MR. ISACKSON: Yeah. And I expect actually to receive more money in than I normally have budgetary. We do that virtually every year -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: So either way -- MR. ISACKSON: -- sales tax, revenue sharing, whatever. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Either way, we're going to have to do a budget amendment coming in once you know hard numbers MR. ISACKSON: Well, normally I don't do budget amendments to true up my revenue over my forecast. I let that flow through the course of the FY. And when we come to you in June, when you see that forecast column, that's where you'll see the true-up in terms of where I think revenue's going to be versus what we budgeted in that particular fiscal year. Page 7 September 20, 2012 COMMISSIONER HENNING: Thank you. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Commissioner Hiller? COMMISSIONER HILLER: Mark, have you accounted for the $11 million de-obligation of TDC funds related to FEMA? MR. ISACKSON: It's in the pro-forma that you're going to see for the Board meeting on the 25th. We've laid that out within that budget. Right now if you look at the adopted budget for 195, that would have to be a reserve position that we would have to -- you certainly have sufficient reserves to do that. What we've laid out for you for your 25th meeting is a pro-forma that shows that. Now, depending on what happens during the course of the year, we might come back with you once we know more information and amend that particular budget. But for right now, as it stands adopted-wise, it would buried up in those reserves at some 25 or 26 million in reserves that you've got sitting in Fund 195. COMMISSIONER HILLER: The second question I have, is have you adequately reserved for the potential $15 million liability related to the FRS employee pension reimbursement? MR. ISACKSON: If the state told me on October 1 that I had to stroke a check for $15 million, that would come from your general fund reserves. Now, do I think that's going to happen? I hope not, and I don't really think that that's going to be the methodology. But that's where we come from. COMMISSIONER HILLER: What do you think the methodology is going to be? I know the Court's just heard the case. MR. ISACKSON: Look, I would hope -- this is what I would hope would happen, and that the three percent component of that and to make the employee groups whole, that FRS would adjust their rates, retirement rates going forward on a methodical basis over the course of time to make the employee groups whole. I don't know, maybe Page 8 September 20, 2012 they'll use some combination of cash from the counties and the respective municipalities plus some adjustment in the Florida retirement system rates. Who knows? But I'm hoping it's not a -- I find it very hard to believe that that will be a one fell swoop check from the municipalities and counties. COMMISSIONER HILLER: We've only found out about these two liabilities over the last few weeks. Are there any other potential liabilities that you're aware of that you haven't brought to our attention at this point that we should be considering for purpose of this budget? MR. ISACKSON: No, I think, ma'am, we've tried to cover most of our, what we think is going to be, of our reserves. Remember, we're growing our reserves from 18 million to 24 million in a relatively weak economy. The only way I can do that is on the expense side of the house. We can't do it on the revenue side, because we're trying to control that element of it. COMMISSIONER HILLER: You've indicated to me that you feel we're under-reserved by about -- MR. ISACKSON: If I had my druthers -- COMMISSIONER HILLER: -- a whole month. MR. ISACKSON: Yes. If I had my druthers -- COMMISSIONER HILLER: -- and we have only enough cash to carry us through one month of operations and that you feel that we need two months. What are you doing to increase those reserves? MR. ISACKSON: Well, ma'am, I can't -- I can only do so much in terms of the general fund reserves. And that's really where I'm concerned about. Because the general fund is the cash flow engine for a lot of different things that go on in the county. Midyear cuts are obviously a technique that we've used over the last few years to do that, to drive our reserve position up. You know, if I have to continue to do that -- remember, the goal is our cash position, our credit rating and the payment of debt. Those are the three things that I pay particularly close attention to as I prepare Page 9 September 20, 2012 budgets and we prepare your budget guidance. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Thank you. So as of this point in time we have inadequate cash reserves. MR. ISACKSON: Well, I -- MR. OCHS: No, ma'am. MR. ISACKSON: I wouldn't call it -- MR. OCHS: Go ahead. MR. ISACKSON: I wouldn't call it inadequate. In fact, I think our cash position is pretty good. But when you start looking at GFOA recommendations and things of that nature, there are a lot of counties that are AAA rated that have a heck of a lot more cash reserves and their cash position's better than ours. But, you know, their revenue sources, their tax rates, their revenue position is a lot different than ours. We do what we can, given our current revenue position. COMMISSIONER HILLER: So then to restate, you recommend that the reserves should be double what they are right now. MR. ISACKSON: Well, I think realistically -- COMMISSIONER HILLER: That's a prudent position. MR. ISACKSON: I think realistically our reserve position in the general fund, I'd like to grow it another six or $7 million. But that's not realistic right now. And we continue to try and incrementally reach a position that provides I think a -- what I would think a reasonable and prudent position and that's what we do. We have other things that we're trying to do in terms of asset maintenance and things of that nature. So it's awful difficult to try and focus on one side and still try to accommodate some of our other desires. COMMISSIONER HILLER: And employee raises. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Let's go back to FEMA de-obligation. What I understood the Florida representative to say to us when he was here is that FEMA has already recovered or will recover that Page 10 September 20, 2012 money from future disbursements to Collier County, or the State of Florida. It's not as if you're going to have to write a check for $11 million. What that really is, is if in fact they win this de-obligation battle, what you're really looking at is a potentially smaller share of disbursements from them in the future. You're not looking at having to write an $11 million check to FEMA. Is that correct? MR. ISACKSON: Well, sir, I don't really know how that $11 million is going to materialize. You're right, it could be off any future disbursements that might come our way. But if someone -- if ultimately I have to write a check, I have to be prepared to do that. And that's what we're -- from a budgetary standpoint, we have to be prepared for that. CHAIRMAN COYLE: So if you're prepared for that and the money has already been taken from the State of Florida, as I understood him to say -- MR. OCHS: That's what Mr. Seibert indicated. CHAIRMAN COYLE: -- that it has already been taken from the allocation to Florida, you are not going to be asked for an $11 million check. So if in fact you are reserving for the potential payment of$11 million, you just increased your reserves dramatically, didn't you? MR. ISACKSON: Well, I -- MR. OCHS: In the TDC fund. CHAIRMAN COYLE: In the -- okay. MR. ISACKSON: Yeah, there's -- MR. OCHS: For beach renourishment, yes, sir. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay. I understood you to say that that money wouldn't have to come out of general fund revenues if you had to pay -- MR. ISACKSON: No, if I portrayed that and you understood it that way, that's not correct. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, very well. MR. OCHS: That money is fenced off in your TDC funds in Page 11 September 20, 2012 your beach renourishment cost center. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay. MR. OCHS: It has no bearing at all on your general fund or your general fund reserves. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, good, thank you. Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah, to answer your question, Leo, I'm in favor of, you know, bringing back the David Lawrence funding. I do have a question about the Ochopee -- Port of the Isles. MR. OCHS: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Now, is that a capital expansion or is it a capital improvement? Because if it's a capital expansion, you should be using impact fees, which they don't have. However, you're using a source to augment capital expansion, and therefore the impact fees would have to be recalculated. The second thing, I'm reading the August 13, '12 Ochopee Fire District and Chief McLaughlin relays to the advisory board that Mr. Jackson said the district will have to get a loan in order to remodel the station. And we're kind of back where we were four years ago. We're looking at a 38 -- 380,000 to 410 loan to finish the facility as is completed. So there is an option for -- to loan the -- our district the money, based upon discussion from your staff, County Manager, to the advisory board. So maybe that's some of the options we can bring back to get that done. MR. OCHS: Yes, sir. Last time we talked about that, you're right, the chief had some discussion with the Ochopee Advisory Board about either doing a district-wide one-time assessment of all property owners or a loan that could be repaid back through the millage. The way their MSTU is set up right now, they're not set up to do an assessment and they're at their millage cap right now and they're Page 12 September 20, 2012 struggling to fund their current operation with their current millage, and it is at its millage cap right now. So the only -- well, we can bring those options back. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Yeah, bring those back because, I mean -- MR. OCHS: We will. COMMISSIONER HENNING: -- we're kind of setting -- it is a dependent district, but we're setting precedence when we do things like that, and we don't want to set precedence where we're, you know, giving money to other fire districts, when they have a source of revenue and they can't meet their source. Right now I think one fire department that can't -- has a difficult time paying their loans off now. So that's my only comment. Yeah, I do want to see that come back. MR. OCHS: Yeah, we will include all of those in the options when we come back, sir. Item #2C PUBLIC COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS MR. OCHS: Commissioners, that takes us to Item 2.0 on your CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, public comments. Ian, do you have any? MR. MITCHELL: Yes, sir, we've one speaker and that's David Schimmel, who will be speaking on the David Lawrence Center. MR. SCHIMMEL: Good evening, Commissioners. I appreciate your support of expanding our Baker Act receiving facility. I appreciate the County Manager's problem-solving attitude and I hope we can get this done. We hope to open first week of November. So resolving whether this funding will be available in October will be very timely. So I appreciate your support. Page 13 September 20, 2012 I'm not going to rehash the importance of this, a public safety need to have these crisis beds available. You know it's a tremendous impact on the community. As I said in June, 600 people had to be referred out and there was about a 10-day wait at area emergency rooms. So we don't want people who need to be treated for their psychiatric problems not getting access to care. And that's what this expansion is all about. So thank you for your support. CHAIRMAN COYLE: If the money isn't available on time, the first patient you'll have there will be Leo Ochs. MR. SCHIMMEL: We've had a bed reserved for Leo for a long time. MR. OCHS: Appreciate it. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Can I ask you a favor? Can you reserve one for Commissioner Coyle too? CHAIRMAN COYLE: Yes, please. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Because based on his last email, I think he needs it. CHAIRMAN COYLE: I need all the help I can get, David. MR. SCHIMMEL: Well, the good news is you probably have insurance. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Probably not. Not for what ails me. It's not a covered item. But anyway. MR. SCHIMMEL: Thank you very much. And if you've got any questions for me, just let me know. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Thank you for all you do. We appreciate your contribution to the community. It's very important. MR. MITCHELL: Sir, that was your only public speaker. Item #2D PUBLIC READING OF THE TAXING AUTHORITY LEVYING MILLAGE, THE NAME OF THE TAXING AUTHORITY, THE Page 14 September 20, 2012 ROLLED-BACK RATE, THE PERCENTAGE INCREASE, AND THE MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED — READ INTO THE RECORD CHAIRMAN COYLE: Good. Then Mark, we'll go through this ridiculous reading of the millage rates. MR. ISACKSON: Commissioners, 2.D is a public reading of the taxing authority, the rolled-back rate, current rate to be levied and percentage increase or change from the rolled-back rate. This public reading is to occur before adoption of final millage rates. I will begin. General Fund 001, the rolled-back millage rate: 3.5736. The proposed millage rate: 3.56245. Percent change in the rolled-back rate: -.25 percent. Water Pollution Control, Fund 114, the rolled-back millage rate: .0294. Proposed millage rate: .0293. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -.34 percent. The Unincorporated Area General Fund 111, the rolled-back millage rate: .7219. Proposed millage rate: .7161 . Percent change from the rolled-back rate, -.80 percent. Golden Gate Community Center, Fund 130, rolled-back millage rate: .1971 . Proposed millage rate: .1990. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: .96 percent. Victoria Park Drainage, Fund 134. The rolled-back millage rate: .0479. The proposed millage rate: .0479. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 0 percent. Naples Park Drainage, Fund 139, the rolled-back millage rate: .0090. Proposed millage rate: .0090. Percent change in the rolled-back rate: 0 percent. The Vanderbilt Beach MSTU, Fund 143, the rolled-back millage rate: .5022. The proposed millage rate: .5000. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -.44 percent. Isle of Capri, Fund 144. The rolled-back millage rate: 2.0424. Page 15 September 20, 2012 Proposed millage rate: 2. Percent change from the rolled back rate: -2.08 percent. Ochopee Fire Control, Fund 146, the rolled-back millage rate: 4.0536. The proposed millage rate: 4. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -1.32 percent. Collier County Fire, Fund 148. The rolled-back millage rate 2.0729. Proposed millage rate: 2. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -3.52 percent. Goodland Fire MSTU, Fund 149, rolled-back, millage rate: 1.2803. Proposed millage rate: 1.2760. Change from the rolled-back rate: -.34 percent. Sabal Palm Road MSTU, Fund 151. The rolled-back millage rate: .1107. The proposed millage rate: .1000. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -9.67 percent. Golden Gate Parkway Beautification, Fund 153. Rolled-back millage rate: .4753. Proposed millage rate: .4753. Percent change of rolled-back rate: 0. Lely Golf Estates Beautification, Fund 152. Rolled-back millage rate: 2.0550. Proposed millage rate: 2. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -2.68 percent. Fox Ridge Storm Pumping MSTU, Fund 154. Proposed millage rate: .0531. Proposed millage rate: .0500. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: - 5.84 percent. Radio Road Beautification, Fund 158. Rolled-back millage rate: .3210. Proposed millage rate: .3210. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 0. Forest Lakes Roadway & Drainage MSTU, Fund 159. Rolled-back millage rate: 1 .1672. Proposed millage rate: 1.1551. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -1.04 percent. Immokalee Beautification MSTU, Fund 162. Rolled-back millage rate: 1.0465. Proposed millage rate: .9354. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -10.62 percent. Page 16 September 20, 2012 Bayshore Avalon Beautification, Fund 163. Rolled-back millage rate: 2.4444. Proposed millage rate: 2.3754. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -2.82 percent. Haldeman Creek Dredging, Fund 164. Rolled-back millage rate: .7613. Proposed millage rate: .7735. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 1.60 percent. Rock Road, Fund 165. Rolled-back millage rate: 2.7024. Proposed millage rate: 3. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 11.01 percent. Radio Road East MSTU, Fund 166. Rolled-back millage rate: .4828. Proposed millage rate: .2401. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: - 50.27 percent. Conservation Collier, Fund 172. Rolled-back millage rate: .1694. Proposed millage rate: .1651. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -2.54 percent. Forest Lakes Debt Service, Fund 259. Rolled-back millage rate: 2.9301. Proposed millage rate: 2.8449. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: -2.91 percent. Radio Road East Debt Service, Fund 266. Rolled-back millage rate: 0. Proposed millage rate: .2319. Percent change from the rolled-back rate, not applicable. Conservation Collier Debt Service, 2005 Series, Fund 272. Rolled-back millage rate, .0815. Proposed millage rate: .0849. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 4.17 percent. Collier County Lighting, Fund 760. Proposed millage rate: .1502 -- rolled-back millage rate, excuse me, .1502. Proposed millage rate: .1631. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: 8.59 percent. Pelican Bay MSTBU, Fund 778. The rolled-back millage rate: .0853. Proposed millage rate: .0857. Percent change from the rolled-back rate: .47 percent. And the aggregate millage rate, rolled-back millage rate, 4.3459. The proposed millage rate: 4.3214. Percent change from the Page 17 September 20, 2012 rolled-back rate: -.56 percent. Item #2E RESOLUTION 2012-162: SETTING THE MILLAGE RATES LEVIED FOR FY2012-13. NOTE: A SEPARATE MOTION WAS REQUIRED FOR DEPENDENT DISTRICT MILLAGE RATES AND A SEPARATE MOTION WAS REQUIRED FOR THE REMAINING MILLAGE RATES — ADOPTED Commissioners, that brings you to Item 2.E on your agenda, which is adoption of the resolution setting the millage rates. And please note a separate motion is required for dependent district millage rates, and a separate motion is required for remaining millage rates. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Let's start with a motion for the dependent millage rates. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Motion to approve the dependent millage rates. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Motion to approve the -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Second. CHAIRMAN COYLE: -- dependent millage rate resolution by Commissioner Fiala, and seconded by Commissioner Coletta. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN COYLE: All in favor, please signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Any opposed, by like sign. Page 18 September 20, 2012 (No response.) CHAIRMAN COYLE: The motion passes unanimously. Now, we'll entertain a motion for the adoption of the remaining millage rates. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Motion to approve by Commissioner -- COMMISSIONER FIALA: Second. CHAIRMAN COYLE: -- Coletta, second by Commissioner Fiala. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Any opposed, by like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN COYLE: It passes unanimously. Item #2F RESOLUTION 2012-163: ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET BY FUND. NOTE: A SEPARATE MOTION WAS REQUIRED FOR DEPENDENT DISTRICT BUDGETS; AND A SEPARATE MOTION WAS REQUIRED FOR THE REMAINING BUDGETS — ADOPTED MR. ISACKSON: Commissioners, Item 2.F on your agenda is a resolution to adopt the final budget by fund. Once again, note that a separate motion is required for the dependent district budgets and a separate motion is required for the remaining budgets. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay, we'll require a motion adopting Page 19 September 20, 2012 the final budget for the dependent district budgets. Motion by? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Commissioner Henning. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Commissioner Henning. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Second. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Second by Commissioner Fiala. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HILLER: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Any opposed, by like sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN COYLE: It passes unanimously. Now we'll entertain a motion to approve the final budget for the remaining funds. Motion for approval by -- COMMISSIONER FIALA: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Second. CHAIRMAN COYLE: -- Commissioner Fiala, second by Commissioner Coletta. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Any opposed, by like sign. (No response.) COMMISSIONER HILLER: Aye. CHAIRMAN COYLE: It passes 4-1 with Commissioner Hiller dissenting. MR. ISACKSON: Mr. Chairman, that concludes my remarks. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Okay. Then in that case we have no Page 20 September 20, 2012 other business to take care of, so we are adjourned unless you have something, County Manager. MR. OCHS: No, sir, just again real quick, I'd like to thank Mr. Isackson and the entire staff from our budget office. They've done a great job, worked very hard to bring this budget to you. So I'd like to thank them for their hard work. CHAIRMAN COYLE: Good. Yes, thank all of you. Very well, we are adjourned. Thank you, and good evening. Page 21 September 20, 2012 ***** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 5:40 p.m. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL FRED COYLE, Chairman ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK . � .�. . w I. !� s e 15 These minutes approved by the Board on ,0 d-,23 0044. as presented �-'' or as corrected Transcript prepared on behalf of Gregory Court Reporting, Incorporated by Cherie' R. Nottingham, CSR. Page 22