BCC Minutes 01/22/1991 R Naples, Florida, January 22, 1991
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Glerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
Director; Ellte Hoffman, Annette Guevin and Wanda Arright, Deputy
Clerks; Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Ron McLemore, Assistant County
Manager; Jennifer Pike, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Guylet,
County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services
Administrator; Bob Blanchard, Growth Planning Director; James Reardon,
Emergency Services Adm~nistrator; Leo Ochs, Administrative Services
Administrator; Wayne Arnold, Bryan Milk, Bob Mulhere, Philip Scheff,
Eric Young and Ron Nino, Planners; Kate Alperr, Risk Management
Analyst; Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; Byron
Tomlinson and Gary Young, Deputies, Sheriff's Office.
Tape #1
Tram ~3
AGKNDA AND CONSKNT AGENDA - APPROVED WITH CHANGES
January 22, 1991
Co~atsstoner Shanaban moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried unanimously, that the agenda and consent agenda be approved
w~th the following changes:
Item #5C - Service Award to Frances B. Black, 10 years -
Library/Naples Branch - Added.
Item #5D - Proclamation designating the Week of January 19th
- 26th, 1991, as "Purple Martin Time" - Added.
Item #6C! - Petition AV-90-104, Anchor Engineering as Agent
for Owner, Amtlcar, Inc., requesting vacation of all public
interest in a portion of an eighty foot road right-of-way
platted as Goodland Drive on the Plat of Marco Beach Unit
13, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Pages 105-106, as recorded in
the public records of Collier County, Florida - Continued to
2/5/91. (Requested by Petitioner).
Item #6C3 - Petition SMP-90-35, Robert A. McGinnis,
requesting Subdivision Master Plan approval for Bass Point, a
portion of Tract 48, less the North 150 feet and portions
described, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 30, Section 29, T49S,
R26E, consisting of 5 acres, more or less - Continued to
]/29/91. (Requested by Petitioner).
Item #7A1 - Petition FDPO-90-4, Marty V. Ellington,
requesting a variance from the minimum base flood elevation
as required by Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance No. 87-80,
on property described as 629 Palm Avenue, Lot 18, Block C,
Goodland Isles - Continued to 2/26/91. (Requested by
Petitioner).
Item #7A2 - Petit/on FDPO-90-3, Gary Weeks, requesting a
variance from the minimum base flood elevation as required by
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance No. 87-80, on property
described as 239 Harbor Place, (Lot ]0, Block 6, Goodland
Heights Subdivision) - Continued to 2/26/91. (Requested by
Petitioner).
Item #14A7 - Recommendation to approve the final plat of
"Paradise Pointe R.V. Resort, Phase One" - Withdrawn.
(Requested by Staff).
8. Item #8A - To be heard first.
9. Item #SG - To be heard second.
10.
Item #8E - Marsha A. Gibbs representing Michelbob's signage -
Continued to 2/26/91.
11.
12.
Item #SH - To be heard following mid-morning break.
Item #9H1 - Appointment of members to the Pelican Bay
Municipal Services Taxing' and Benefit Unit Advisory Committee
- Continued to 1/26/91. (Requested by Commissioner
Goodnight).
Item
Page 2
January 22, 1991
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20t 1990 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED
Com~tssioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
carried unanimously, that the minutes of the November 20, 1990 meeting
be approved ~s presented.
Item #SA
RICHARD D'ORAZIO, EMERGENCY SERVICES DIVISION, EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
FOR JANUARYr 1991 - RECOGNIZED
Commissioner Volpe recognized Richard D'Orazio, Paramedic with
Emergency Services Division, as employee of the month for January,
1991. He congratulated and thanked Mr. D'Orazio and presented him
with a plaque and a check tn the amount of $50.
Item ,SB
PROCLAMATION EXTENDING GRATITUDE ANDAPPRECIATION TO JOAN JENKS -
ADOPTED
Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner Hasse moved,
seconded by Commissioner Shanahan and carried unanimously, that the
Proclamation extending gratitude and appreciation to Joan Jenks for
her enduring contribution to the citizens during her tenure at the
Go/den Gate Community Center, be adopted.
Page
Itel
KMPLOYKK SKRVICE AWARD - PRESENTED
January 22, 1991
Commissioner Saunders presented an employee service award to
Frances B. Black for ten years of service with the Naples Branch of
the Collier County Library. He thanked her for her service and pre-
sented her with a pin and a service award certificate.
Item ~D
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF JANUARY 19TH - 26TH, 1991 AS
"PURPLE MARTIN TIME" - ADOPTED
Upon reading of the proclamation, ¢o~tssloner Shanahah moved,
seconded by Coatsstoner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the
proclamation designating th~ week of J~uary 19th - 26th, 1991, as
'~le ~ttn Tt~e", be adopted.
Mr. Glenn Mackay accepted the proclamation.
ooo,,,,: 1:3'
Pa~e 4
January 22, 1991
CH~tLgS $TRADER, REPRESENTING SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SOCIETY, RE COUNTY PROPERTY FOR LABORATORY FACILITIES - STAFF TO MEET
WITH PETITIONER, EVALUATE COSTS TO PROVIDE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND
PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS IN TWO WEEKS
Mr. Arthur Lee, Trustee of the Southwest Florida Archaeological
Society and Craighead Laboratory Director, stated that three years
ago an agreement was entered into with the Board of Gounty
Commissioners which gave the Society access to use a small building on
the grounds of the County Museum as a laboratory. He explained that
there were no problems the first two years, but noted that there is
now a financial problem.
Mr. Lee reported that the first two years, the Society processed
materials and prepared same for storage, and last year when the analy-
sis began on the bulk of the bone shell and pottery fragments, outside
help was sought. He indicated that due to provisions contained in the
agreement, liability insurance is required and the cost for this is
exactly the amount that remained in surplus. He related that in
attempting to find various ways to obtain additional monies, it was
discovered that the only budget item that could be dented is the
possibility of deleting the ~nsurance premium but the only way this
would be allowed, is that the Commission relieve the Society of the
agreement. He requested that the present activity be permitted to
continue at the Museum with volunteers.
Mr. Lee stated that the Gounty has been including this building
with normal insurance coverage through the years, and therefore, there
would be no addit~onal charge in this regard.
Mr. Lee disclosed that 1-1/2 years ago the Society appeared before
the Gommission and requested the enactment of an ordinance to protect
the archaeological and historical sites in Collier Gounty and as a
gesture of goodwill, appealed.the State for funds to conduct a survey
of the resources in Collier County. He noted that after a year of
struggle, it was learned that $10,000 will be received from the State.
Page
January 22, 1991
He revealed that this type of survey is one which would normally be a
county function.
Risk Management Analyst Alperr advised that Collier County covers
Craighead Laboratory under its property and liability insurance poli-
cies, however, she reported that through the use of the indem-
nification language and the hold harmless agreement in the agreement
dated March, 1987, the portion of the So¢lety's risk has been trans-
ferred back to them. She indicated that this is for their acts or
failure to act, and noted that Staff feels that the laboratory expo-
sure is high hazard. She reported that if the Society should cause
bodily injury or property damage to the building or another person,
their insurance coverage would provide that protection.
Commissioner Saunders questioned whether the volunteers could be
covered under the County's own personal liability coverage, to which
Mrs. Alperr replied affirmatively.
Gommlssioner Saunders suggested that Staff meet with the
Archaeological Society to determine the Gounty's cost to assume that
responsibility and if this is a modest cosT, perhaps the Society could
be covered since they are providing a public service to the communlty.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that this is a question of cost and
whether the Commission wishes to assume that risk. He noted that he
will convey to Risk Management the need to talk with the
Archaeological Society with regard to structuring a volunteer program.
Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahen and
c~rried unanimously, that Staff be directed to meet with the
Archa~ologic&l Society to evaluate the costs to the County to provide
insurance coverage with respect to a volunteer program, and present
reco~mdatAons to the Commission in ~wo weeks.
$A!'~$ ~,LRRA~Lo REPRESENTING GOLDEN GATE PRESEYTERYAN CHURCR,
R,~QO*BSTZNG R~LOCATYON - NO ACTYON
Dr. Neno Spagna, representing Golden Gate Presbyterian Church,
requested an interpretation and action from the Commission as to
Page 6
January 22, 1991
whether the petitioner may proceed with a Planned Unit Development for
a church which is being proposed on the North side of the East/West
Main Canal, on the West side of Santa Barbara Boulevard. He indicated
that this project was started in July, 1990 and there have been a
series of discussions with staff with regard to what could and could
not be done. He advised that it was originally planned to submit the
petition last September, but due to the changes relating to the new
Golden Gate Master Plan, there was a question with respect to whether
the petitioner would be eligible for a Provisional Use.
Dr. Spagna explained that the petitioner is currently eligible for
a Provisional Use, but if the Commission adopts the Golden Gate Master
Plan on February 5th, as presently scheduled, staff has interpreted
that.his client will no longer be eligible for same. He revealed that
staff is of the opinion that the new Master Plan would not permit a
church in the subject location as a Provisional Use, and the PUD would
be contrary to the intent and purpose of the Plan. He requested
advice and Guidance as to whether the petitioner should proceed with
the PUD in this location.
Dr. Spagna disclosed that the subject property involves approxima-
tely 12 acres of land and several of the people in the surrounding
area are either supportive of the church or have not indicated any
objection to same.
Dr. Spagna called attention to a drawing of the proposed church,
noting that it will be constructed in three phases and will include
approximately 60,000 square feet of floor area when completed, in add-
ition to a school, sanctuary, meeting rooms and related facilities
that are required for the operation of a church.
Dr. Spagna declared that if there was currently an existing church
and an expansion was desired, chances are, this would not comply with
the new Golden Gate Master Plan. He indicated that he believes that
it would be a hardship for a church to stop everything and be unable
to expand because of the requirements of the Master Plan. He noted
17
Page ?
January 22, 1991
that if his client submits a petition at this time, he would be in
compliance but if he waits until after February 5th, he will not be in
compliance. He advised that his client would like to submit a peti-
tion immediately, however, he does not want to create a lot of paper-
work that may be futile. He questioned whether submittal of a
petition at this time would be considered as being in compliance with
the current Zoning Regulations that existed at the time that the plan
was submitted, or if a determination will be made indicating that it
does not comply with the new plan and will not be considered.
Commissioner Volpe stated that the County is currently going
through the process of zoning teevaluation. He affirmed that if this
is unimproved property that is currently zoned, and does not fall into
one of the exemptions or exceptions of the Growth Management Plan, the
property may not be developed if it is inconsistent with the new Plan.
Commissioner Saunders advised that he is very sympathetic toward
the needs of the churches, but noted that the problem is that there
currently is no mechanism which would allow the Commission to grant
relief of this situation. He explained that he feels that Dr. Spagna
should apply for a PUD or Provisional Use and make his arguments as he
goes through the process.
Tape #2
County Attorney Cuyler expressed concurrence with Commissioner
Saunders' comments, noting that the only other alternative would be
for Dr. SpaGna to seek a formal interpretation from the Growth
Planning Department and that can be appealed to the Commission, but he
does not believe there is sufficient time to do this prior to the
adoption of the Golden Gate Master Plan.
Commissioner Volpe remarked that after February 5, 1991, this use
will be inconsistent with the Golden Gate Master Plan unless the Plan
is amended.
Commissioner Goodnight stated that she would like to discuss this
at the time of the hearing on the Golden Gate Master Plan and obtain
Page 8
January 22, 1991
input from the Committee as to their feelings. She indicated that she
believes that the Committee is not opposed to churches, but they are
opposed to provisional uses next door to residential properties.
Dr. Spagna questioned whether it is possible to amend the Golden
Gate Master Plan at the public hearing on February 5th, to which
County Attorney Cuyler replied that the Plan may not be amended at
this time, but noted that the Commission does have the discretion to
make changes to what has been sent to the State.
County Manager Dotrill stated that he has received a letter and an
associated petition from the Lely Presbyterian Church to be entered
into the record.
Growth Planning Director Blanchard advised that anyone wishing to
address this issue should not want until February 5th. He indicated
that a meeting will be held tomorrow evening at 5:05 P.M. to discuss
and debate the Plan amendments.
With regard to the timing of the application, Mr. Blanchard stated
that if this petitioner was to proceed immediately, that in no way
vests the project. He indicated that staff has issued an interpreta-
tion to Planning Services staff pertaining to whether this particular
use would be acceptable under a PUD, but it has not gone through the
formal interpretation that County Attorney Cuyler alluded to, which
provides the opportunity to appeal staff's decision before the
Commission.
Mr. Blanchard remarked that there has been a great deal of thought
and debate with the Committee with respect to the Master Plan. He
noted that one of the primary issues that has been discussed relative
to provisional uses in Golden Gate Estates, has been the number of
same that has been occurring along Golden Gate Parkway which is a ma~or
corridor.
Mr. Wayne Martin, Moderator of the Building Committee for Golden
Gate Presbyterian Church, stated that the Golden Gate Master Plan
legislates churches out of Golden Gate. He requested a positive
Page 9
January 22, 1991
endorsement from the Commission so that the church can go through the
process. He indicated that the church has the support of the com-
munity with 317 signatures on petitions and 86 letters. He related
that the church will be providing good programs that the County will
not have to pay for, and these programs will be taking many children
off the streets. He advised that he believes that this master plan,
as presented is good for Golden Gate and is consistent.
Mr. Steve Barnes announced that engineers and architects have been
hired to develop a first class set of plans. He advised that the
adjacent south property line homeowners association has written a
letter endorsing the project; David Lawrence Center has written a
letter Indicating that they do not oppose the project. He indicated
that staff's opinion is that this project is inconsistent with the
proposed master plan, and he questioned whether the Commission will be
administering the Plan dogmatically and without any flexibility. He
remarked that he believes that churches improve the quality of life.
Commissioner Shanahan encouraged the petitioner to move ahead with
the necessary steps for a formal interpretation in this regard.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that if the petitioner files a for-
mal request for an interpretation and appeals same, he will know where
he stands within 30 days. He stated that if the petitioner pays his
fee and does not process through the PUD and there is no staff time
involved, the Commission has the discretion to return the fee.
Reverend Henry Bragan, Pastor, Go/den Gate Presbyterian Church,
stated that he is not asking the Commission to work against the
County's rules and regulations, but made an appeal that consideration
be given to amending the Golden Gate Master Plan.
Mr. George Keller, President, Collier County Civic Federation,
stated that it is disturbing to see so many people coming forward at
the last minute to request changes to the Plan which has been in the
works for seven years. He suggested that this petitioner attend
tomorrow evening's public hearing. He related that if adjustments are
Page 10
January 22, 1991
going to be made to the Plan, they can be made later.
There was no action t~ken on this item.
ORDINANCI 91-5, RE PETITION R-90-18, ROBERT L. DUANE OF HOLE, MONTES
AND ASSOCIATES, INC., REPRESENTING FRANCIS D. HUSSEY, REQUESTING
REZONE FROM C-4 TO PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF U.S. 41 AND WEST
OF OLD U.S. 41 - ADOPTED AS AMENDED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
January 2, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition
R-90-18/Hole, Montes & Assoc., Inc., representing Francis D. Hussey,
M.D., for an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations
for the Unincorporated Area of Collier County from C-4 to "PUD"
Planned Unit Development known as Meadow Brook Estates for 306
dwelling units, located on Old U.S. 41 (north of future Livingston
Road), consisting of 34.2 acres.
Planner Milk stated that currently this site is zoned C-4, is
heavily vegetated, and contains wetland and upland habitat. He Indi-
cated that this pro3ect is located between Old U.S. 41 and New U.S. 41
and lies ad3acent to the northern boundary of the new proposed County
Road.
Mr. Milk advised that land uses to the east are commercially
zoned, C-4 and Agricultural zoned undeveloped properties; land to the
north is the Cypress Head PUD and is currently undeveloped; land to
the east is Industrial zoned property, partially developed; and land to
the south is undeveloped C-4 Commercial.
Planner Milk explained that the petitioner proposes to convert
34.2 acres of C-4 commercial zoning to residential multi-family PUD
District, at a density of 9 dwelling units per gross acre. He
reported that the conversion factor would allow a maximum of 306
dwelling units within the site. He noted that the Density Rating
System of the Future Land Use Element provides a mechanism for con-
verting commercial zoning to residential zoning. He announced that
Page 11
January 22, 1991
for every one acre of commercial zoning converted to residential
zoning a maximum of 16 dwelling units may be achieved for a net
increase in density of 13 dwelling units per acre inasmuch as the
base permitted density is 3 dwelling units per acre. He noted that it
is staff's opinion, that approval of 6 dwelling units for each one
acre of commercial zoning converted to residential zoning is an
appropriate conversion factor for this site. He revealed that the
site has excellent access to adjacent arterial and collector roadway
and the Surrounding land uses and zoning districts are compatible with
the proposed use.
Mr. Milk stated that at the December 20, 1990 Collier County
Planning Commission Meeting, the residents of Landmark Estates voiced
concerns with regard to the intersection of Old U.S. 41 and New U.S.
41, however the petitioner has stipulated that he will provide ade-
quate ingress and egress, adequate lighting and stgnalization and 140
feet of easement.
Mr. Milk advised that currently the Level Of Service on Old U.S.
41 is "A", and noted that this project will not impact the level of
service by 5~ and therefore, Staff is recommending approval. He
related that the CCPC is forwarding this petition to the Board of
County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Milk pointed out that the
criteria states that ACLF housing shall be a minimum of 500 square
feet floor area, and a minimum of 750 square feet for multi-family.
He indicated that the PUD document allows two 50' buildings: one for
ACLF and one for multi-family development, but villas and townhouses
are limited to a maximum height of 35'.
Commissioner Volpe recalled that at last weeks meeting a peti-
tioner was asked if he would agree to comply with a sunset provision,
and requested that discussion be held in that regard relative to the
subject petition. Attorney George Vega stated that he concurs with
the inclusion of a sunset provision.
ooo 22'
Page ! 2
January 22, 1991
Mr. Milk called attention to the agenda packet, Page 64, Item 4.2:
"Maximum Dwelling Units" and noted that the following language should
be added: "This figure includes Adult Congregate Living Facilities
(ACLF's)."
Mr. Robert Duane, representing the Petitioner, stated that his
client is proposing to dedicate the right-of-way for the extension of
Livingston Road. He expressed that within the 34 acres, there are
approximately 18 acres for upland preserve areas. He remarked that
the impacts on U.S. 41 will be minimal. He noted that the proposed
densities of this project are compatible to the surrounding area.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Duane explained that at the
very minimum, the factor for conversion from commercial to residential
would allow his client to make application for 3 units per acre and at
the fezone process, he could request that consideration be given for a
higher density due to the access to Livingston Road.
Mr. Duane stated that the petitioner will be coming back to the
Commission with a request for an SMP and at that time he will provide
detail indicating the manner in which the two parcels will be tied
together since they are under common ownership.
Mr. Donald Perry, resident of Landmark Estates, stated that he
does not ob3ect to the project, but voiced concerns on behalf of the
?50-800 residents in his subdivision with regard to the amount of
traffic that will be generated from the proposed development. He
remarked that he is pleased to hear that the petitioner is willing to
donate the 100' strip of right-of-way from Old 41 to New 41 and time
is of the essence in this regard. He suggested that the County
proceed as quickly as possible with construction of the road from Old
4! to New 41 and that the present traffic light be moved to the inter-
section of Livingston Road Extension at New 41.
Commissioner Volpe stated that when he first reviewed this peti-
tion, he was under the assumption that there would be a 35' building
height maximum but learned that there is a 50' maximum. He questioned
Page 13
January 22, 199!
whether Mr. Duane's client would be willing to limit the height to 35'
throughout the pro3ect, to which Mr. Duane replied that his client is
willing to reduce the height to 35'.
There were no other speakers.
Co~misaloner Shanahen moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
carried unanimously, to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Shanahen moved, seconded by Commissioner Hesse and
carried unanimously, that the Ordinance as numbered and titled below
be adopted subject to the PUD document, including the addition of
language regarding the interconnect commitment, the extension of the
right-of-way commitment, and the limitation of 35' buildings
throughout the project and entered into Ordinance Book No. 42:
ORDINANCE 91-5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-25-10;
BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM C-4 TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
MEADOW BROOK ESTATES FOR 306 DWELLING UNITS, LOCATED ON OLD U.S.
4! (NORTH OF FUTURE LIVINGSTON ROAD), IN SECTION lO, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 34.2
ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
$'' Recess: 10:45 A.M. - Reconvened: 10:55 A.M. at which time
Deputy Clerk Guevtn replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman
Item
COUNTY MANAGER AUTHORIZED TO ALLOCATE STAFF TO PERFORM LABOR TO
ENLARG~ EAST NAPLES BASEBALL FIELD
Robert Boyer explained the purpose behind this request is to gain
a practice field for the Greater Naples and Gulf Coast Senior League.
He said the School Board has given their approval, and he is now
asking for help from the County in making an existing field larger for
Babe Ruth Baseball. He mentioned receiving donations from Better
Roads, the East Naples Civic Association and Wright World of Sports
which have helped defray the costs and asked the Board for the labor
force necessary to physically change the field. He said this will
entail two men for possibly two days.
Co~saleeloner Huse ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Shanmhan and
000 '2A
· . Page 14
,.T~"~uax~2' 22, :1991
carried unanimou~l¥, to authorize the County Manager to allocate staff
to perfor~ the labor necessary to enlarge East Naples Baseball Field.
Item #7B3
RESOLUTION 91-36 RE PETITION PU-90-21, ERVIN ROSS, REPRESENTING EAST
NAPLES BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., REQUESTINO PROVISIONAL USE "a" OF THE
RMF-6 ZONINO DISTRICT FOR PARKINO LOTS AND FOR TWO EDUCATIONAL
BUILDINGS TO BE ACCESSORY TO A CHURCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF SHADOWLAWN DRIVE AND SOUTH OF CONNECTICUT AVENUE - ADOPTED
WITH A~REEMENT SHEET AS AMENDED
Phil Schell, Planning Services, stated this petit/on has been
found in compliance with the Growth Management Plan, and all
appropriate County agencies have found no objection to its approval.
He stated the CCPC has forwarded Petition PU-90-21 to the Board with a
unanimous recommendation of approval. He mentioned that no one spoke
in opposition at the CCPC hearing, however, one letter has been
received suggesting that the vacant land next to the existing church
be utilized for the proposed educational buildings and additional
parking.
In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Planner Scheff stated the
buildings proposed for educational structures are already there and
this request is to convert them from a single family home and a guest
house to Sunday School structures.
Ervin Ross, representing the petitioner, explained this petition
requests approval of a PU on Lot 27 which contains the two current
buildings, the legaltzation of Lots 24, 25 and 26 that have been
existing parking lots since 1971 and the PU for the two vacant lots to
be made into parking spaces. He said the church currently has 681
students enrolled in Sunday School classes and extra teaching facili-
ties are needed.
Commissioner Volpe indicated single family residences surround
this property, and stated his concern with the size of the parking
lot, lighting, and buffering for those residences, as well as the
great deal of traffic already on Shadowlawn Drive.
Planner Scheff explained that the stipulations in the Petitioner's
25
Page 15
January 22, 1991
Agreement Sheet address the concerns of buffering. He suggested
adding the standard stipulation that "lighting shall be maximized such
as to protect neighboring properties and bulbs shall be shielded and
pointing down".
John Fager spoke in favor of the petition and stated the traffic
pattern on Shadowlawn Drive will not be affected, because this is for
Sunday School and the traffic is much less on that day of the week.
Wilson Whitehead mentioned that the facilities will not be used at
night, therefore, lighting of the parking lots should not be a factor.
Co~aisstoner Shanaban moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
carried unanimously, to approve Petition PU-90-21 subject to the sti-
pulations in the Petitioner's Agreement Sheet and the additional sti-
pulation above, thereby adopting Resolution 91-36.
Page 16
January 22, 1991
It~
PETITION PU-90-23, TERRANCE L. KEPPLE OF BRUCE GREEN & ASSOCIATES,
INC., REPRESENTING DELTONA UTILITIES, INC., REQUESTING PROVISIONAL USE
"b" OF SECTION 8.10 (ESSENTIAL SERVICES} WITHIN THE RSF-4 ZONING
DISTRICT FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER TREATMENT, STORAGE AND PUMPING
PLANT AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES FOR PROPERTY ON MARCO ISLAND LOCATED
SOUTH OF LILY COURT AND ABUTTING THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF COLLIER
CO~ FRANK MACKLE PARK - CONTINUED TO 2/5/91 AND STAFF TO WORK WITH
PETITIONER TO PROVIDE A STUDY OF ALTERNATE SITE WITH COST COMPARISON
Wayne Arnold, Planning Services, presented this petition for a
PU for a reverse osmosis water treatment plant and related facilities.
He said the 7.68 acre site is located on Marco Island and is adjacent
to the County's Frank Mackle Park. He said if approved, the plant
will ultimately serve six million gallons of potable water per day to
Island residents. He advised that surrounding land uses include eight
single-family homes, however, Staff is of the opinion the water treat-
ment plant can be a good neighbor as long as proper considerations are
taken for noise and odor abatement. He noted the CCPC heard this
request on 12/20/90 and voted 4/3 to deny the petition because of con-
cerns relating to noise and odor. He added four letters of objection
have been received by Staff. He said modifications to the site plan
have been made subsequent to the CCPC hearing, such as the addition of
storage tanks and the water treatment building has been shifted in
order to create a larger separation from the residential properties.
He concluded that Staff continues to support this petition and, if
approved, asks that modifications be made to the stipulations to
account for the additional storage tanks on the site.
Mr. Arnold clarified for Commissioner Shanahan that the plan
denied by the GCPC did not include the potential future storage tanks.
Commissioner Saunders questioned why this site has been chosen?
Mr. Arnold replied the location Is currently owned by Southern States
Utilities and three storage tanks are presently on site. He said
Staff has not analyzed any other locations, however, the issue of
looking into other sites on the Island was brought up at the CCPC
hearing.
Page 17
anuary 1991
Commissioner Saunders asked if, other than the fact of ownership
of the property and Given that the site is surrounded on three sides
by residential and open space areas, is there any Good reason to
locate the plant on this site? Mr. Arnold stated that from a planning
aspect, the location is acceptable, adding the County ordinance provi-
des that essential services may be located in a residential area. He
mentioned if they could not be, the County itself would be hard
pressed to locate its own water treatment facilities.
Attorney Don Pickworth, representinG Marco Island Utilities, pre-
sented the Board with a Group of exhibits that he requested be made
part of the record. (Copies on file in the Clerk to the Board's
Office.) He also passed out copies of letters of support addressed to
the Board from the Marco Island Fire Department, the Marco Island
Civic Association, the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), the Board of Realtors and the Lee County Electric Go-op, who
had originally objected to this project. (Copies not provided to the
Clerk to the Board). He proposed that additional stipulations be
included on the AGreement Sheet which address landscaping and
screening to further buffer the plant from the surroundinG residential
areas.
Commissioner Shanahan commented that he understands the Australian
pines were planted to protect the neighborhood from the facility,
which has not happened. He said they are totally inadequate and three
years is a long time to watt for vegetation and landscap1ng for that
facility. He added the neighbors have always been unhappy with the
buffering and will continue to be three years from now. He said more
mature plantings should be added.
Mr. Pickworth advised that trees as well as the six inch plants
will be planted. He said additional screening will be placed around
the facility if requested, because the intent is to make the site
attractive within the neighborhood.
Commissioner Saunders suggested constructing a decorative wall as
January 22, 1991
well as the landscaping which will contain the notse and glare and
prevent the plant from being seen from the neighborhood.
Mr. Pickworth stated although that idea will be expensive, the
petitioner Is willing to do whatever it takes.
Mr. Arnold added that Staff has no objection to a wall and
although restrictions in a residential district limit the height of
fences to six feet, the Lee 0ounty Electric Co-op received a variance
to construct a ten foot fence a few years ago.
James Maloney, Vice President of Voice LaCier (phonetic), reported
that his firm did the noise analysis on the site. He stated the peti-
tioner will guarantee that noise levels will not exceed the Collier
County ordinance which allows for a maximum sound level of 55 DBA at
night.
Commissioner Hasse commented that the noise will occur 24-hours
per day with no relief. Mr. Maloney advised that a continuous sound
level is not a detriment in that continuous tones are more easy to
address and tend to blend in with the environment. He said intermit-
tent or impulsive tones tend to be disruptive. He stated silencers
have been Installed and, in addition, baffles will be installed
throughout the plant to absorb the sound level inside, therefore
making it quieter outside the plant as well.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Pickworth indicated if
approved today, the plant is expected to be on-line by November, 1991.
Ralph Terrero, Chief Engineer for Marco Island Utilities, said the
present capacity of the water treatment plant on Marco is eight
millton gallons per day and the current demands are very close to that
capacity. He stated that because of problems with the distribution
system in the southwest and southeast ends of the Island, it was
determined that the best location for new facilities should be located
on the south end. He said to locate the facilities within the commer-
cial and industrial portion of Marco will result in additional costs
for land acquisition, applications for permits, new engineering costs
Pa~e 1 9
January 22, 1991
and relocation of wells from the southern end of the Island. He added
an additional line will have to be brought from the main water treat-
ment plant to Unit 25 to pump it from that unit because that is where
most of the demand is centered. He stated this will result in
spending approximately $4.5 million in addition to $7 million already
needed for the new facility.
Commissioner Volpe commented that the capacity will be raised from
8 million to 12 million gallons per day with the new plant. He asked
what population will that now serve? Mr. Terrero asserted that the
capacity will actually increase from 8 million to 9 million gallons,
because of a water treatment plant with a capacity of 3 million
gallons that will be put out of service. He said the plant cannot
meet today's standards. He stated the additional one million gallons
will serve at least two years of growth on the Island, at which point
in time the facility being requested this date will be expanded.
William Conlin, Vice President and Manager of Stone-Webster's
Water Technologies Services Division, addressed a concern of
Commissioner Hasse regarding sludge. He said there will be no odor
involved because the process will be contained within a totally
enclosed facility. He said the process itself is very clean and will
not have open tanks or sludge pits. He described the physical layout
of the proposed facility. He mentioned that out of approximately 2300
community facilities in the State of Florida, 90% get their water from
groundwater that contains some amount of hydrogen sulfide which produ-
ces the odor. He said the same percentage are in residential areas
and the majority use either tray aeration or degasifiers, which are in
totally enclosed facilities.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Conlin assured the Board
that no odor will be emitted from the plant. He said the petitioner,
in an attempt to be a good neighbor, is going the extra step of
installing scrubbers which will virtually eliminate all odors from
escaping the plant.
35
Page 20
January 22, 199!
Ernie Carroll, a Real Estate Appraiser in Naples, indicated he was
contacted by Mr. Pickworth to perform a study to determine whether the
market showed that values of residential properties ad3acent to this
site in the past appeared to be less valuable than those not impacted
by the site. He concluded that he found nothing that indicates the
properties in this area had particularly diminished in value because
of their location.
Commissioner Saunders asked Mr. Carroll if he would state cate-
gorically that construction and operation of this facility will have
no affect on property values on lots immediately ad3acent to that
facility? Mr. Carroll responded that he could not.
Commissioner Shanahan commented that unimproved as well as
improved property has gone up for sale as a result of this facility
being built. He asked how Mr. Carroll would put that in his equation
relative to the diminution, maintenance or increase in values of
those properties? Mr. Carroll maintained since he had not included
that in his study, he could not make a professional 3udgment on that
issue.
The following people spoke against the petition, stating that
further study needs to be done with regard to the location and the
need for this type of facility on Marco Island; property owners in the
immediate area will suffer a loss in value in order that all residents
of Marco Island will pay less for water; the availability of an alter-
nate site on the Island which is in an industrial area; locating the
plant at the alternative site will not cost what has been portrayed by
the petitioner; provisional uses in residential neighborhoods should
be of a less intensive nature than those allowed in industrial or com-
mercially zoned areas; the County needs to become involved to ensure
that this is looked into in an impartial, in-depth manner before any
decision is made:
Robert Duklaver
Robert Stiers
Glenn Tucker
Tape d~
Joe Hetker
George Keller
36
Page 21
January 22, 1991
''' At tht. ti~e Depu~ Clerk Arright replaced Deputy Clerk Guevin '''
Mr. Pickworth noted that it is the petitioners obligation to show
that it will be a good neighbor, and stated that he feels they have
met this obligation. He commented that he does not feel that a plant
of this type will effect property values. He pointed out that many
studies have been made for the county regarding water needs to Marco
Island, and these studies have made mention of RO plants.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mike Arnold stated that this
particular treatment process is the correct one for the source of
water treatment to be used on Marco Island. He commented that as to
the location of the plant, it was his opinion that this particular
site has been targeted and identified for this use for a number of
years. He noted that this type of processing treatment can be almost
totally enclosed within a building and made to blend into any
setting. He stated that he feels that this site is an appropriate
one.
Mike Arnold explained that in regards to whether an hydraulic ana-
lysis of the Marco Island system has been made, he could only assume
that this has been done in reviewing the facts given.
Mike Arnold advised that as to whether this plant is the
appropriate manner for Marco Island to meet its future demands, it
will not meet the ultimate demand of the Island. However, he added
that If the plant is not on line by 1992, the one million gallon a day
amendment from the county would have to continue; therefore, requiring
an interim processing plant. Commissioner Volpe concurred.
Mr. Conltn responded to Commissioner Goodnight's question by
explaining that there is no problem with mixing the RO water and
the lime softening water from the system because both waters have to
meet Federal DER standards. He clarified that all the studies that
have been done to date regarding 'this issue have confirmed that there
is no problem mixing the waters tn the system.
Commissioner Volpe commented that with all that has been said and
January 22, 1991
in reading the findings of facts from the CCPC, he feels that this
particular location with all the mitigation that is being proposed
is an acceptable one.
Commissioner Shanahah emphasized that he is concerned about the
property rights of the people involved, and stated that he feels
this is another intrusion into a residential neighborhood. He
expressed that he has concerns regarding whether or not enough effort
was expended in looking at other locations for this plant.
Commissioner Shanahah related that he does not feel that there is
an emergency at this time, and pointed out that Marco Island has been
taking conservative measures regarding water restrictions. He stated
that he does feel the need for a master plan in respect to water for
Marco Island for the future.
Commissioner Saunders suggested that the petition be continued for
30 days, in order for Staff to analyze whether another site would be
better suited on Marco Island for this plant.
Mr. Pickworth agreed that if it is the desire of the Board, he is
willing to bring back further information regarding the possibility of
an alternative site; however, he stated that he feels that this site
is adequate and does not create an injurious effect on the neigh-
borhood.
Commissioner Volpe stated that to have the petitioner go back and
review alternative site locations for this plant does not make sense
because the same argument could be made for any location on Marco
Island. I commented that a decision needs to be made, and he does not
want to see this continued for another 30 days.
¢om~ssioner Shanahan moved that Petition Number PU-90-23 be
~nte~d,. Motion failed for lack of a second.
Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Hames and
CaXTted 3/2 (Commissioners Volpe and Shanahan opposed), that Petit/on
PU-90-2S be continued for two weeks, and direct staff to work with the
pettt~oner ~nd Mr. Pickworth to see if there is an alternative site
Januar~ 22, 1991
and bring back the comparison of the location if found and the costs
uso~tated with them before the Board.
DO 91-2; RESOLUTION 91-37; AND ORDINANCE 91-6 RE PETITIONS PDA-89-1
AND DOA-89-1, AMENDMENT TO THE MARCO SHORES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DOCUMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ORDER -
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Pecember 18, 1990 for Petition PDA-89-1 and December 23, 1990 for
Petition DOA-89-1, as evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed
with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an amendment to
the Marco Shores Planned Unit Development document and development of
Regional Impact Development Order for property located in Section 33,
Township 5! South, Range 26 East.
Planner N/no stated that the petitions propose an amendment to the
Marco Shores Development Order and its related Planned Unit
Development document as it relates to the northwest corner of S.R. 951
and Isle of Capri Road, known as the Isle of Capri Commercial Tract.
He explained that both of these documents include provisions that pro-
hibit the development of the Isle of Gapri Commercial Tract until S.R.
951 is four-laned. He reminded the Board that when this issue was
reviewed before by them, they determined that this was an insubstan-
tial change.
George Vega of Vega, Brown, Stanley & Martin, P.A., representing
Donald K. Ross and Robert B. Leebet {defined Benefit Pension Trust),
informed that since concurrency occurred everyone else with property
on S.R. 951 has been allowed to proceed with their developments except
his clients. He pointed out that Staff agrees that the restriction
should be lifted.
In response to Commissioner Volpe's question regarding when they
would start construction, Mr. Vega noted that his clients cannot get a
loan from a bank right now because they cannot give a date certain as
to when construction could start. He commented that there is a time
Page 24
January 22, 1991
table for the docks because of the Corps of Army Engineers permit
which they will loose if they are not built within the given time.
Mr. Vega replied to Gommissioner Shanahan's inquiry that an anti-
cipated time frame would be two years to start on the 150 unit hotel.
Comunisstoner Shanahan stated that the CCPC agreed that there
should be a modification to the PUD and questioned if they all agreed,
to which Mr. Nino replied that he believes the vote was 7/1.
In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Nino remarked that if the
prohibition was removed, the petitioner would be on the same level as
the other property owners along S.R. 951 to develop. He explained
that the date certain provided by the CCPC was when S.R. 951 was
widened, and this does nothing more than continue the prohibition that
currently exists on the property. He indicated that staff is of the
opinion that both the proposed development order and the PUD amend-
ments should be approved and is consistent with the Growth Management
Plan.
James Stansbury of the Florida Department of Community Affairs
stated that the Department has not received to date a notification of
the proposed change for this specific amendment pursuant to Subsection
380.0619 of the Florida Statutes. He disclosed that this notification
should have been done sfmultaneous with the notification to the local
government and the regional planning council; therefore, since this
was not done, he feels that consideration to adopt the amendment is
not appropriate at this time. County Attorney Cuyler stated that this
is something the developer needs to address. Mr. Vega acknowledged
that the petitioner is at risk if this is approved, but that is bet-
ween the petitioner and the DGA. Mr. Vega explained that DCA has 45
days to appeal the decision.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Gounty Attorney Cuyler com-
mented that discussions between DCA and the petitioner have taken
place, and added that Mr. Vega is requestlng approval today. He noted
that the Board has decided tn favor of the developers argument to
Page 25
January 22, 1991
proceed with this public hearing, and the Board has acted entirely
legally. He informed that if DCA does appeal, the responsibility is
the developers. Mr. Stansbury clarified that if this amendment is
approved, it does not mean that DCA will automatically appeal, and he
is only here to report that DCA feels that the public hearing is
inappropriate at this time due to the lack of proper notification of
the change by the developer.
Robert Leebar, petitioner, reiterated that the disagreement with
the State is something that they will have to handle. He pointed out
that under the Growth Management Plan with the concurrency act,
everyone has the right to build except for the property in question.
He stated that this property should be allowed to benefit from the
Growth Management Plan's concurrency act.
Co~isstoner Shanahah moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
taxi-ted unanimously, that the public hearing be closed.
Co~miaeioner Shanahah moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
cmxTtedunanimously, that Petition DOA-89-1 be approved thereby
adoptlng Developmental Order 91-2 and Resolution 91-37, and Petition
PDA-89-1 be approved thereby adopting the Ordinance as numbered and
titled below and entered into Ordinance Book No. 42:
ORDINANCE 91-6
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-42, AS AMENDED BY
ORDINANCE NUMBER 88-48 AND 89-34, THE MARCO SHORES PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY DELETING SECTION 6B.4, TRAFFIC;
SUBSECTION B OF SECTION 6B.6, ENGINEERING; SECTION 6B.?,
LETTER OF COMMITMENT; EXHIBIT "E"; AND SUBSECTION D OF
SECTION 12.6, PLANNING DEPARTMENT; ALL OF WHICH SECTIONS AND
SUBSECTIONS PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE
ISLE OF CAPRI COMMERCIAL TRACT UNTIL S.R. 951 IS FOUR-LANED;
AND BY PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 26
January 22, 1991
ORDINANCE NO. 91-7 RE PETITION R-90-33, SHELLY O'STEEN OF DIMENSION
ONE ASSOCIATES, INC., REPRESENTING SUMI~ER GLEN OF I[~OKALEE, LTD.,
REQUESTING A REZONE FROM A-2MH TO PUD TO BE KNOWN AS SUMMER GLEN
APARTMENTS FOR 46 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST OF
S.R. 29 - ADOPTED, WITH CHANGES AND THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
BEINg APPROVED BY THE BCC
Legal notice having been published tn the Naples Daily News on
November 29, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-90-33
filed by Shelly O'Steen of Dimension One Associates reprr:senttng
Summer Glen of Immokalee, Ltd., requesting a fezone from A-2MH to PUD
to be known as Summer Glen Apartments for 46 affordable housing units
for property located on the south side of Lake Trafford Road, approxi-
mately one mile west of S.R. 29 and approximately 500 feet west of
Palm Drive in Section 32, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, and con-
sisting of 7.43 acres.
Planner Schell Informed that the property is located on the South
side of Lake Trafford Road and to the North is undeveloped land; to
the South is a mobile home subdivision; to the East are undeveloped
woodlands, single-family homes, and Garden Lake Apartments which is
another Affordable Housing Project; and to the West are undeveloped
woodlands, mobile homes, and single-family homes. He pointed out that
a great deal of the area is agricultural which is transforming into
more urban types of uses.
Mr. Scheff affirmed that the request for a 6.2 unit per acre den-
sity is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. He advised that
Staff and all appropriate County agencies have reviewed this petition
and recommend approval, subject to Staff's stipulations. He noted
that the CGPC forwarded the subject petition to the Board of Gounty
Gommissioners with a unanimous recommendation for approval. He
explained that no correspondence has been received in opposition to
the project; however, one neighboring property owner requested clari-
fication to the property owner letter that she received.
000 PAf.,[. '4~ Page 27
January 22, 1991
Mr. Scheff explained that subsequent to the Planning Commisston's
public hearing, Staff has determined the need for an additional stipu-
lation addressing the issue of excess fill-dirt from the subject pro-
perty. He specified that Staff recommends that stipulation hh, which
is a provision for off-site removal of earthen material, be added to
the PUD document.
Mr. Scheff pointed out that the Affordable Housing AGreement which
is a condition to the approval of the PUD has not had a final review
by Staff; therefore, Staff is recommending approval of this petition,
subject to a subsequent approval of the Agreement that Is being worked
out between Staff and the petitioner. He clarlfied that before a site
development plan approval would be granted, the Affordable Housing
Agreement would have to be approved. In response to Commissioner
Volpe, Mr. Schell referred to April Circle and the subsequent
agreement approval as a prior precedence. County Attorney Cuyler
noted that the recommendation is that the agreement not come back
before the Board, but it would be subject to substantially what the
Board has done in the past and reviewed by his office. Mr. Cuylar
emphasized that in the future the agreement will be finalized, signed
and part of the petition when presented to the Board for approval.
County Attorney Cuyler explained to Commissioner Volpe that the
options available to the Board regarding this petition are to either
approve the PUD today and make the effective date 30 days from now;
continue It for two weeks; approve the PUD, subject to just the
agreement coming back to the Board in two weeks; or approve the PUD,
subject to the agreement meeting his approval to protect the County's
interest.
Mr. Schell noted that this petition has been continued previously
and would have to be readverttsed if continued today.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Guylet
stated that the agreement which he would negotiate on the Board's
behalf is rather standard, and added that they have been done before
January 22, 1991
in this manner. He explained that the agreement provides for the cer-
tification of incomes, etc.
Assistant to the County Manager 011iff disclosed that the peti-
tioner has indicated that they have no problem with the PUD being
approved subject to the agreement coming back before the Board in two
weeks, if that is the pleasure of the Board.
Mr. Schell clarified the question raised by Commissicner Shanahan,
that stipulation f is no longer relevant.
Ccm~issioner Saunders moved, seconded by Gommissioner Shanaban and
c&x-rtedunanl~ou~ly, that the ~blic heartn~ be closed.
c~ri~ ~tmly, that the Ordin~ce as n~bered ~d titled bel~
~ ~t~, ~bJect to the final Affordable Houstn~ A~eement bean9
a~r~ ~ the ~d of Co~ty Co~tssioners, staff's additional stt-
~lati~, ~d the deletion of sti~latlon f, ~d entered into
Ordi~ce ~k No. 42:
ORDIN~CE NO. 91-7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ATLAS MAP NUMBER 6932S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A-2MH TO "PUD"
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS SUMMER GLEN APARTMENTS FOR
46 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD (C.R. 850), APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE
WEST OF S.R. 29 AND APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET WEST OF PALM DRIVE
IN I~OKALEE, LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE
29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 7.43 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ass ~c~s~: 2:35 P.M. - Reconvened: 3:05 P.M. at which
tt~ ~ Clerk Hoff~ replaced Deputy Clerk Arri~hi ***
It~D
~ C. ~R~ ~SE~ING S~ER PI~S SDP ~89-220, ~Q~STING
~ ~ ~CIN~ - NO ACTION
Mr. Jerry Bosworth, representing Immokalee Non-Profit Housing, Inc.
advised that this entity is building the Sanders Pines project which
will house 200 members of low income working families in Immokalee.
He requested approval to place three strands of barbed wire on the top
18
Page 29
January 22, 1991
of the chain link fence that has been installed around the perimeter
of the site. He noted that this is intended to reduce the risk of
injury to persons and the loss of property to the residents.
Mr. Bosworth referred to a drawing of the pro3ect which will con-
tain 9 buildings with 40 apartments and is surrounded by a wooded
area. He pointed out that the barbed wire would discourage any
unauthorized entrance to the site from over the fence. He explained
that he understands that the Commission can grant permission for the
barbed wire to be installed. He indicated that the first residents
are expected to move into the development next month.
In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Bosworth reported that during
construction, there has been vandalism and theft from the site, noting
that the points of entrance by those taking the materials have been
over the fence.
Commissioner Volpe stated that he has a problem with barbed wire
fencing being used to keep the element out and suggested the use of
some type of security for the individual unit owners. He remarked
that if this is a high crime area, the Sheriff should be summoned to
do his Job and remove the unauthorized people from this pro3ect.
Mr. Bosworth pointed out that financially, there is not the abi-
lity for security which provides this protection. He related that
police protection will not work as a preventive measure when con-
sideration is given to the lack of control in this area. He expressed
that these residents will be families with the parents working during
the day and most of which will have young people on the site without
adult supervision. He indicated that security lighting is provided
within the site.
Commissioner Hasse asked Deputy Gary Young of the Sheriff's to
comment on his feelings relative to the barbed wire fence. Deputy
Young stated that the higher the fence and the bigger the obstacle on
top of it, the greater the deterrent.
Commissioner Volpe expressed concern with respect to safety and
age
January 22, 1991
the children playing in the area. He mentioned that one of the
reasons that barbed wire is not allowed without some special cir-
cumstances is the issue of safety.
Commissioner Goodnight expressed that it is a said state of
affairs if the community has to resort to barbed wire on the top of a
chain link fence for affordable housing. She suggested that if
problems are experienced after the residents have moved in, the issue
should be presented and will be addressed at that time.
Commissioner Shanahan questioned whether Mr. Bosworth has any
alternatives with regard to beeftng up security, to which he replied
that there will be a neighborhood watch program in addition to close
management on site.
1o Action was taken on this ires.
Ita~SC
RIiPANIC ~gR OF CONI~RCE OF COLLIER COUNTY REQUESTING
R~CON~IDERATION OF DECISION RE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ADVISORY
BOARD MEMBER SELECTION - COMMISSIONERS SAUNDERS AND SHANAHAN TO WORK
WITH HISPANIC SOCIETY TO ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION BY HISPANICS TO APPLY
FOR ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERSHIPS
Mr. Victor Valdes, President, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of
Collier County, stated that the Hispanic people have a right to be
Involved in County affairs. He Indicated that he believes that the
Hispanics were discriminated against at the December 18, 1990 Board of
County Commissioners meeting when appointments were made to the
Tourist Development Council Advisory Board. He pointed out that out
of the County's 307 members of advisory committees, none are
Hispanics.
Mr. Valdes requested that the Commission reconsider the appoint-
ments that were made to the Tourist Development Council Advisory
Board, and recommended that Mr. Zac Lucio be appointed.
Commissioner Hasse explained that the Board of County
Commissioners has not discriminated against anyone. He announced that
he voted on the basis of the resumes that were submitted, and not on
Page 31
January 22, 199!
race, religion, etc.
Commissioner Saunders remarked that it appears that there is a
of emotion being shared among the people gathered at today's meeting.
He indicated that he has tried to encourage more applications for the
advisory boards and the solution is to have representatives from the
Hispanic community serving on these advisory boards, notJng that he
will make a commitment to do just that, if Mr. Valdes will make a com-
mitment to have applications submitted as the advisory board vacancies
become open. He explained that the Tourist Development Council is a
very important body and the Hispanic community should be represented
on same. He remarked that he is not in the position to remove someone
from that committee in order to appoint someone else as a member,
but suggested that Mr. Lucio be appointed to the very next vacancy on
that committee.
Commissioner Goodnight stated that a Hispanic woman is serving as
the Ghairperson for the Immokalee Lighting and Beautification
Committee. She cited that the Commission has not been discriminating
against anyone, but the problem is, with the exception of the TDG,
that Hispanics have not applied. She pointed out that there is an
American Indian who serves on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board,
an American Black serves on the Planning Commission and several Blacks
serve on the Lighting and Beautification committees. She indicated
that the problem is not discrimination, but rather the lack of
interest in the community. She advised that she recommended that Zac
Lucio be appointed to the TDC but was overruled.
Mrs. Edna Enino, State Legal Advisor for the League of United
Latin American Citizens (LULAC), explained that the main objective is
to identify those persons who would be able to participate in the com-
munity. She noted that her organ~zation has programs for Job
training, and education. She voiced her concern that there is no par-
tic~pat~on of Hispanics in this area. She noted that stat~stics prove
that there has been total exclusion of Hispanics serving on any of the
149
Page 32
January 22, 199!
County's committees.
Mrs. Enino related that she questions the validity of the appoint-
ments that were made to the TDG and requested that the Commission
reconsider same.
Commissioner Shanahah pointed out that he is totally committed to
appointing Hispanics to the various committees and indicated that
there has been no intent by this Commission to circumvent the Hispanic
community. He disclosed that a number of persons applied for appoint-
ments to the TDC and the Commission attempted to select the nine best
candidates.
Commissioner Shanahah reported that it has been only recently that
Messrs. Valdes and Lucio contacted him and requested that the
Commission give more favorable consideration to applicants from the
Hispanic community. He indicated that the Commission has not had the
opportunity to provide that type of representation that Mr. Valdes is
requesting but this will be done if applications are submitted in the
proper manner.
Commissioner Goodnight advised that on various occasions she and
Commissioner Hasse have gone out and recruited persons to serve on
advisory committees dealing with their Districts since people did not
apply on their own. She explained that these committees are adver-
tised and interested persons need to submit their resumes, noting that
it is not the responsibility of the Commission to go out and seek
applicants.
Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson replied that during
the past several weeks she has forwarded press releases of every
vacancy on each advisory committee to Mr. Valdes. She indicated that
currently there are three committees with vacancies.
Commissioner Saunders stated that the entire Commission has
expressed the desire to work with the Hispanic community. He volun-
teered to work with Mr. Valdes and assured him that he will commit to
appointing a representative from the Hispanic community at the time of
Page 33
January 22, 1991
a vacancy.
Mr. Robert Caninc, Director of LULAC, offered the services of his
organization whenever the Commission needs qualified individuals to
fill advisory board vacancies. He noted that the local President of
LULAC is Mr. Zac Lucio and Mr. Valdes is the Vice-President. He
expressed his thanks to the Commission for opening the doors to
Messrs. Valdes and Lucio.
Mr. Bernardo Garcia pointed out that the Hispanic community is
attempting to make a significant contribution to County Government.
He indicated that he does not believe that anyone wants to see a per-
son appointed to a committee simply because he or she is Hispanic, but
noted that on the other hand, he does not want to see someone pre-
vented from same on the same basis. He remarked that a great deal of
frustration has resulted from this matter since it was the first time
that someone had made an attempt to participate on an advisory commit-
tee and he was not appointed. He indicated that if Hispanics shed
their blood for the United States, they have the right to participate
in County Government.
Mr. Zac Lucio stated that his frustration is not for himself since
he does not have any political aspirations. He indicated that he has
no preference as to who should be appointed, but he desires to see the
Spanish community advance.
Dr. Frank Beltran, resident of Marco Island, stated that everyone
must cooperate with respect to democracy. He explained that he is a
Urolog~st and he has offered to help the people of the Hispanic com-
munity who are in need.
Mr. Frank Rodriguez explained that the Hispanic community believe
in the system they live in, vote for, fight for and are willing to die
for. He remarked that the Hispanics are ready, willing and able to
~oin and contribute to the growth, betterment and progress of Collier
County. He stated that he recommends that Zac Lucio be appointed as a
member of the Tourist Development Council. He noted that in 1980, the
Page 34
January 22, 1991
Hispanic population of Collier County was 10.8~ of the total popula-
tion, and today, tt is estimated that Hispanics represent 20% of
Collier County's total population. He cited that the Hispanic's right
to participate in local government has been curtailed and disregarded.
He requested that the Commission take positive action to reconsider
the decision that was made at the December 18th meeting and to appoint
Mr. Zac Lucio to the TDC.
Mr. George Keller stated that he opposes statements made by
racial or religious groups citing that they are entitled to quotas.
He noted that if people want to contribute to the County, they should
do so.
It was the consensus of the Commission that Commissioners Saunders
and Shanahan will work directly with the Hispanic Society to encourage
participation of Hispanics to apply for positions on the County's
advisory committees.
Commissioner Saunders pointed out that there is a Sunshine
Law, and explained that any meetings would be conducted in open
session. He suggested that perhaps there is the need to create an
advisory committee to deal with Hispanic relations with the County.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that consideration be given to iden-
tifying a member of the County Manager's office who has the respon-
sibility of working with the Hispanic and other minority communities
to make sure there is involvement. Commissioner Goodnight advised
that she will discuss this during her next meeting with County Manager
Dotrill and provide a report to the Commission.
It~P
MR. PAUL HOFFMAN REGARDING SOVEREIGNTY - NO ACTION
Mr. Paul Hoffman requested that the Commission adopt a resolution
proposed by "Sovereignty", which is a national grass roots campaign to
make known to Gongtess the public's awareness that a tremendous tax
savings can be realized merely by asking Congress to do what is man-
dated by the Constitution.
52
Page 35
January 22, 1991
Mr. Hoffman explained that the "Sovereignty" proposal asks
Congress to assume its Constitutional authority and direct the
Treasury Department to loan interest free money to taxing authorities,
i.e. the Board of County Commissioners, for voter improved capital
projects.
Mr. Hoffman read his resolution into the record which is on file
with the Clerk of the Board. He remarked that the resolution is not
binding to anything more than a statement of support for action to
relieve the tax burden from the taxpayers. He divulged that the
School Board and the Lee County Commission have adopted this resolu-
tion. He noted that the adoption of this resolution will result in
great stimulation in the economy.
Commissioner Saunders stated that some groups have taken the posi-
tion that the charging of income tax by the Federal Government is
unlawful and questioned whether this is the position of Sovereignty.
Mr. Hoffman replied that this is not the position of Sovereignty and
noted that the purpose is to promote the resolution.
Commissioner Volpe questioned whether the adoption of the resolu-
tion would do anything for the national deficit, to which Mr. Hoffman
replied that that is a problem that will be resolved when it gets to
Congress.
Mr. Rfchard Loeber remarked that he has not heard the type of
consideration or debate that took place before the Lee County
Commission or the School Board. He indicated that he feels that it
is important to consider the aspects of Sovereignty before endorsing
something for someone else to act upon. He noted that if the
Commission endorses this resolution, it gives the implication of
potential backing of the Sovereignty proposal. He indicated that if
adopted, the resolution would lead to chaos. He urged the Commission
not to embarrass the citizens of Collier County by endorsing this
scheme.
Mr. George Keller asked the Commission to think about what this
.53
Page 36
January 22, 1991
will do to the dollar. He indicated that he feels that this resolu-
tion Is ridiculous.
Mr. Fred Tarrant stated that he concurs with Messrs, Loeber and
Keller's comments. He cited that it is totally illegal for Congress
to throw aside its responsibility to control the value of the currency
and turn it over to private bankers and the Federal Reserve System,
but this has been done. He remarked that he belleves that this would
have a disastrous effect on the currency and credibility that the
United States stands for.
Mr. Ron Pennington expressed hls amazement that other governmental
bodies endorsed the resolution. He declared that presumably, tt was
done with little or no considerat/on. He indicated that thts resolu-
tion will add to the existtrig national debt. He stated that endor-
sement of the Sovereignty proposal would be a gross, flscally
irresponsible act.
~ ~ no action t~ken on this tten.
R~SOLUTION 91-38, PETITION CCSL-90-12, WESTINGHOUSE COMMUNITIES OF
NAPLES, INC., REPRESENTING WESTINGHOUSE C0~YNITIES OF NAPLES, INC.
AND COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, REQUESTING A COASTAL
CONSTRUCTION SETBACK LINE VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY
SERVICES TO THE PELICAN BAY NORTH BEACH FACILITY FROM THE STRAND
IN PELICAN BAY UNIT "8" - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS AS AMENDED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
December 23, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petltton CCSL-90-12,
filed by Westinghouse Communities of Naples, Inc. and the Board of
County Commissioners, requesting a seventy foot var!ance from the
Coastal Construction Setback Llne, to allow the installation of utili-
ties to the North Beach Facillty from the Strand in Pelican Bay, Unit
8.
Chief Environmental Specialist Worsham advlsed that this item is a
request for a seventy foot variance from the Coastal Construction
Setback Line (CCSL) from the Strand community to their new proposed
Page 37
January 22, 1991
North Beach facility. He divulged that the proposed construction
would include a potable water supply line, fire control water supply
line, sanitary force main, electric service, telephone service and
cable television service. He reported that the major considerations
would involve alternate routes, i.e. under the boardwalk. He related
that staff is recommending approval of this petition, subject to sti-
pulations to provide for the restoration of the beach after construc-
tion.
Commissioner Volpe noted that a portion of the force main will
require that the County grant an easement for the installation of the
utilities in this area. Mr. Worsham replied affirmatively, and
pointed out that the easements have been applied for but the Real
Property Department is waiting to see if this variance is granted.
Commissioner Volpe remarked that he has no problem with the
variance but questioned whether there is a condition relating to the
responsibility of revegetating the dune system.
Mr. Worsham announced that an additional stipulation can be
included indicating that there must be an approved mitigation plan for
restoration of whatever was disturbed prior to the issuance of the
vehicle on the beach permit for future maintenance.
Mr. Lou Hoegsted, Executive Vice President of Westinghouse
Communities of Naples, Inc., pointed out that staff has approved a
beach pavilion with enclosed bath facilities, but other than that,
there has been no determination as to what will be constructed.
Mr. Hoegsted advised that the Pelican Bay Improvement District
will be responsible for maintenance from the meter to the north end,
and the Pelican Bay of Naples Foundation, Inc. will be responsible for
the maintenance from the meter south down the beach.
There were no speakers.
C~tes~oner $hanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried unanimously, to close the public hearing.
55
Pa~e 38
Januar~ 22, 1991
Coom/Ntoner Shanahan~oved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried 4/1 (Cme~te$toner H&sse opposed), to approve Petit/on
CCSL-90-12, thereb~ adopting Resolution 91-38, subject to etaff's sti-
pulations and the additional stipulations relative to maintenance and
restoration, and if any repairs are necessary resulting in revegeta-
tton of the dune ~stem, it will be provided.
· Page 39
January 22, 1991
O~D~ 91-8, ~S~B~ZSEZRG ~ CO~B&~ AI~0NO~[~ I~E[;~ PROGRAN -
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
January 2, 19.91, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an ordinance
establishing the Combat Automobile Theft Program.
Jackie Kline, Chief Operations, Collier County Sheriff's Office,
requested that the Commission support a Combat Auto Theft Program by
adoption of an ordinance.
Mr. Kline stated that Florida Statutes Section 316.008, Paragraph
"B", provides the authority for municipalities to establish an ordi-
nance for this program. He advised that a study has been conducted
with regard to the forms and decals that are required by Statute. He
noted that there will be a cost of $1.00 to persons wishing to
register their vehicle for participation in this voluntary program.
He explained that a fluorescent yellow decal will be affixed to the
lower left window of a vehicle that is registered in this program. He
indicated that if these vehicles are spotted traveling on the road
between the hours of 1:00 A.M. and 5:00 A.M., display of the decal
authorizes law enforcement to stop the vehicles and determine why they
are out on the road.
Commissioner Volpe stated that if someone stole a car, he would
think that the first thing that would be done would be to scrape off
the decal.
Mr. Kline affirmed that persons enrolled in this program will sign
a consent form authorizing the halting of their vehicles. He remarked
that those that participate in the program will be those who are nor-
mally not out during those early hours of the morning.
In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Kline reported that when a
vehicle is stopped, the driver will be required to show his drivers
license and registration.
Page 40
January 22, 199!
There were no speakers.
Co~aissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Con~iseloner Shanahah and
c&rriedu~animously, to close the public hearing.
Co~tssioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahah and
carried 4/1 (Commissioner Volpe opposed), that the Ordinance as num-
bered and titled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No.
42:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-8
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE COMBAT AUTOMOBILE THEFT PROGRAM;
PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR TITLE AND
CITATION; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR PROGRAM
REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8~t Recese: 5:05 P.M. - Reconvened: 5:15 P.M. at which time
Deputy Clerk Guevtn replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman
Item ,7B!
R~SOLUTION 91-39 RE PETITION PU-90-28, MRS. CREWS OF CREWS SALVAGE
REQUESTIN(] PROVISIONAL USE "B" OF SECTION 8.10 (ESSENTIAL SERVICES)
WITHIN THE C-5 ZONING DISTRICT FOR A TRANSFER STATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 105 EAST NEW MARKET ROAD, IMMOKALEE - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO
THE PETITIONERrS AGREEMENT SHEET
Eric Young, Planning Services, described this request for a PU for
a transfer station on property leased by Mrs. Crews, at which she will
take in non-ferrous metals and possibly at some future date, glass and
other recyclable materials. He mentioned that Mrs. Crews currently
operates a very similar establishment at a different location and is
hoping by relocating her operation to the proposed site, that she
be in a better position to accommodate walk-in clients. He explained
that most of the people in the area have no method of transportation
to her current location.
Commissioner Volpe commented that the operation being proposed can
be quite noisy. Mr. Young reported that because the proposed site is
surrounded on two sides by a packing house, which is a very loud
operation, sounds from Mrs. Crews' operation will not be of concern.
Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
carried unanimously, to approve Petition PU-90-28 subject to the
pulations on the A~reement Sheet, thereby adopting Resolution 91-39.
January 22, 199!
Item~B2
RESOLUTION ~91-40 RE PETITION PU-90-25, DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E.,
~ENTING IMMOEALEE AUTO SALES, INC., REQUESTING PROVISIONAL USE
"G~ OF THE C-4 ZONING DISTRICT TO ESTABLISH A USED CAR LOT AT THE
I~ECTION OF NEW ~T ROAD AND CHARLOTTE STREET IN IMMOKALEE -
ADOPTED SUBJECT TO THE PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT SHEET
Bob Mulhere, Plannlng Services, explained the subject property for
Petition PU-90-25 is located within the urban residential area as
designated on the FLUE map. He noted the proposed use ts permitted as
set forth in the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan and is also tn
compliance with the proposed Immokalee Master Plan. He mentioned that
the CCPC heard this petition on 1/3/91 at which time the petitioner
also requested a reduction in the required minimum floor area from
1,000 feet to 300 feet to accommodate a small sales office as provided
for by Provisional use "F" of the C-4 zoning district. He said all
County agencies have reviewed this proposal and agree with the recom-
mendation of the CCPC to forward Petition PU-90-25 to the Board of
County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, including the
reduction in minimum floor area, subject to the conditions set forth
in the Agreement Sheet.
Commissioner Volpe questioned the reason for the request to reduce
the size of the sales office7 Mr. Mulhere replied the petitioner does
not require any greater floor area because most of the actual business
will take place on the car lot itself.
David Wilktson, representing the petitioner, further explained
that a sales trailer was originally proposed, however, it is not
allowed within th~s PU according to the Zoning Ordinance. He stated
the petitioner subsequently agreed to the stipulation of a modular
unit but requested the reduced size.
Co~tseloner Hasse moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahan and
¢arriedlanani~usl¥, to approve Petition PU-90-25 subject to the
lTulmtion~ in the Agreement Sheet, thereby adopting Resolution 91-40.
Page 42
January 22, 1991
STAFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 82-2 FOR SUNSET
PROVISIONS RELATIVE TO PUD REZONES
Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator,
explained there is currently no policy to require inclusion of a sun-
set provision in proposed PUD's, however, the draft of the Unified
Land Development Code (ULDC) does provide several sections relative to
recommendations for sunset actions. Specifically, he said, if a deve-
loper does not install up to 15% of the infrastructure necessary for
their development within five years, or permits are not pulled for at
least 15% of the number of dwelling units, or at least 30% gross
leasable space for commercial activity is not leased within a six year
period, recommendations for action by the Board are included in the
draft. He reported the Board has the option of waiting for revisions
to the ULDC to be completed, direct Staff to incorporate the recommen-
dations in all projects currently pending, or amend the Zoning
Ordinance to include language relative to sunset provisions for PUD
fezones.
Commissioner Volpe suggested the Board direct Staff as a matter of
policy that, whatever the ordinance turns out to be, provisions for
thls issue will be incorporated into a PUD. He said that will at the
same time require fast-tracking an amendment to the Unifled Land
Development Code to get this matter before the Board as soon as
possible.
Mr. Brutt asked for clarification if the Board is recommending the
language as proposed by the consultant for the 15% and the 15% and 30%
requirements? Commissioner Volpe indicated those provisions seem
quite fair. He asked the County Attorney to also investigate whether
sunset provisions can be made to apply to previously approved PUD's as
well.
It was the consensus to direct staff to prepare an amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance to include language for sunset provisions rela-
tive to PUD fezones.
72
Page 43
January 22, 1991
I~n~H2
REPORT ON TH~ FINANCING OF THE ROAD IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE
COUNTT*S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACCEPTED AND COUNTY MANAGER TO BRING BACK
INTerIM FINANCING PLANS
County Manager Dotrill reported there is a considerable shortfall
in revenues for the five-year growth plan for the total transportation
system. He said the plan consists of 35 projects for an approximate
cost of $152-millton, and only one half of the money is available. He
said due to the demise of the sales tax, an alternative approach for
funding is a special assessment district concept to be added to ad
valorem tax bills beginning next year. He stated another issue is the
deficiency in the current staffing within the Transportation
Department, with each of the existing staff handling 300% more pro-
Jects and 700% in additional work related activity. He said a third
issue is the cumbersome procurement process, which takes five or six
years from the time a project is initially conceived until it can be
put into service. He noted the executive summary includes a complete
financing scheme that shows the various amounts of money necessary and
the various sources of revenue needed in order to fund the current
transportation program.
County Manager Dotrill mentioned that the Board asked in a pre-
vious meeting why the County could not put off construction of some
roads or lower the levels of service County-wide to buy more time. He
asserted that has been attempted twice in the past, and each time the
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has denied the request. To give
a total balanced budget over five years and also recognizing the
Board's concern with property tax increases not only last year but
antic~pating a worse problem this year, he proposed that the road and
bridge fund become permanently self-sustaining through gasoline taxes.
He asked the Board to keep in mind that even with approval of a spe-
cial assessment tax, money will not be available until 1992 or 1993,
therefore, interim financing is necessary. He said he will present a
short list of consultants to develop a methodology for a County-wide
73'
Page 44
January 22, 1991
assessment tax at the next meeting. He suggested including as part of
the scope of services, an analysis of all available options for road
impact fees. He advised that by rewriting the methodology for com-
puting road impact fees, there is a great possibility of increasing
those fees by a substantial amount.
Gommissioner Volpe mentioned his concern that the interlocal
agreement states the need of $54-million for local roads, discussion
at a Strategic Planning session projected a need for $65-million, and
now the amount has been increased to $?2-mtllion. Mr. Dotrill
responded that given the numerous changes in the State's position, it
is very difficult to pin down an amount.
Gommissioner Volpe stated if what is needed is $30-million rather
than $?2-million, perhaps gas taxes could be utilized rather than
increase ad valorem taxes.
Assistant County Manager McLemore responded the questions cannot
be answered until the County has some idea of what the maximum impact
fees can be, which goes back to consultants reviewing all projects and
then developing a new methodology for computing those fees.
Commissioner Saunders stated he is not prepared to move forward on
any type of funding mechanism until he knows what all the alternatives
are.
Commissioner Shanaban asserted that the need for construction of
certain roads has been identified repeatedly and an action plan is
absolutely essential to maintain concurrency. He said it is not in
the best interest of the community to delay making a decision any
longer and he, for one, is ready to move on this matter.
Commissioner Volpe agreed, but stated he is questioning how much
it will cost for the projects that need to be completed and what the
shortfall will amount to. He said once the shortfall is identified
and impact fees are max~mlzed, then the Board will know how much money
will need to be raised, whether through a County-wide special
assessment district or simply bonding the County's gas tax revenues.
74
Page 45
January 22, 1991
County Manager Dorr111 stated that from a practical point, people
do not generally bond gas taxes for twenty years, because once that is
done, those funds can never be used for anything else.
Commissioner. Volpe countered that the federal government as well
as other communities within the State of Florida do, in fact, bond gas
taxes.
Commissioner Goodnight stated the proposed consultant will not
only study a County-wide assessment, he will also provide information
on maximum amounts that can be collected through road impact fees.
With those two proposals completed, she said, the Board will be able
to see what the impact will be to the average homeowner in Collier
County.
George Keller, President of the Collier County Civic Federation,
stated many factors need to be taken into consideration with regard to
how much money will be needed and where it should come from.
In answer to a variety of questions posed by Peter Meeuwsen,
County Manager Dorrill stated any existing improved parcel that deri-
ves a benefit from an improved road network, regardless of the type of
building on it, will be required to pay a proportionate share of the
cost of an assessment tax. He said it is also contemplated that
unimproved property, or raw land, also derives some benefit as the
result of the County's concurrency requirements and would be required
to pay some type of assessment. He indicated that before any
assessments can be levied, a public hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners is required.
Richard Loeber commented that the Board seems to be responding to
the message sent by the taxpayers with the defeat of the sales tax,
however, he suggested that reducing spending in other areas needs to
be revisited as quickly as possible.
Commissioner Shanahan pointed out that action has already
been taken to reduce expenditures in various areas, which has resulted
in close to $2 million in savings to date, and attempts for further
35
Page 46
January 22, 1991
reductions will be ongoing.
Fred Tarrant, Taxpayer Action Group, made comments from the
audience which were inaudible to the Recording Secretary.
Co~issioner Shanaban moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
carried ~z~ai~ou~ly, to author:lze the Country Manager to develop an
tnter~ financing plan, conceptually reorganize the Transportation
~t, solicit proposals from private construction managers and
sho~t ltmt consultants for analysis of impact and road assessment
Ite~ ell&l & 11A2
BUD(~ AMENDMENTS 91-76 THROUGH 91-80 - ADOPTED
Co~iseloner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
carried tlnani~o~sly, that B~dget Amendments 91-76 through 91-80 be
RESOLUTION 91-4! APPOINTING SCOTT L. FRENCH, SARAH SPARKS AND JOAN
JENE~ TO TH~ GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE - ADOPTED
Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Haese and
carrledun~ni~ously, to appoint Scott L. French, Sarah Sparks and Joan
Jenk~ to the Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee, thereby
mdopt~lteeolution 91-41.
Page 47
January 22, 1991
NOTE: Prior to approval of the consent agenda, Herb Savage, President
of Architects of South Nest Florida, commented on Item #14E3. He
asked the Board to give special consideration to establishing a policy
of awarding County contracts to local or adjacent County companies.
County Manager Dorrt]l mentioned that he has spoken to Mr. Savage,
explaining that local firms cannot be given preferential treatment.
Commissioner Volpe indicated he has been under the impression that
part of the County"s considerations in awarding contracts is the loca-
tion of a company.
County Attorney Cuyler stated the location can be considered with
regard to response time, however, a company cannot be chosen only for
that reason.
Commissioner Shanahah reported this subject has been discussed
many times and whenever possible local companies are chosen, within
the scope of the law.
I~$ Co~iss~oner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner
Saun~ers and carriedunanimous/y, that the following items under
the consent agenda be approved and/or adopted: sty
Ite~,14A!
RESOLUTION 91-42 GRANTING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY,
DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "QUEENS
PARK AT LAGO VERDE~ PHASE I" - WITH STIPULATIONS
1. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security for main-
tenance of the infrastructure until the Board of County
Commissioners grants final acceptance of all improvements.
2. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Maintenance
Agreement for Preliminary Acceptance.
See Pages__~' q~
Ite~14A2
RESOLUTION 91-43 GRANTING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY,
~~, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEM~NTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "QUEENS
PARK AT LAGO VERDE~ PHASE II" - WITH STIPULATIONS
1. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security for main-
tenance of the infrastructure until the Board of County
Commissioners grants final acceptance of all improvements.
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Maintenance
Agreement for Preliminary Acceptance.
See Pag.. -- ,l IO
78
Page 48
January 22, 1991
RESOLUTION 91-44 GRANTING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY,
D~AINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "QUEENS
PARK AT LAGO VERDEf PHASE VI" - WITH STIPULATIONS
Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit (posted with the
Clerk) as security for maintenance of the infrastructure
until the Board of County Commissioners grants final accep-
tance of all improvements.
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Maintenance
Agreement for Preliminary Acceptance.
Preliminary acceptance of improvements will not become effec-
tive until water and sewer facilities have been conveyed to
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
See Pages III - lid
Item914A4
IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 29150 ACCEPTED AS SECURITY
FOR NOM~ DEPOT, U.S.A.
See Pages // ~
FINAL PLAT OF "CRT~TAL LAKE RV RESORT, PHASE TWO" APPROVED FOR
RECOIEDINU - WITH STIPULATIONS
Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security to
guarantee completion of the Subdivision ~mprovements.
Authorize the recording of the final plat of "Crystal Lake RV
Resort, Phase Two".
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement.
That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the
required improvements have received preltmlnary acceptance.
See Pages
Item #14ASA
RESOLUTION 91-45 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATeMeNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 26, BLOCK 231, UNIT ?, GOLDEN
CHARLES B. BOLTON.
See Pages /m3-
Item 914A6B
RESOLUTION 91-46 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 10, BLOCK 10, NAPLES MANOR ANNEX,
LOUIS AND LORETTA CAMBRUZZI
Item ~14A6C
See Pages la
I~SOLUTION 91-47 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
A~AT~NT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 12, BLOCK 366, MARCO BEACH UNIT
gLB~F~N~ BERNARD M. AND COLLEER P. COLLINS
79
Page 49
January 22, 1991
See Pages~
Itel ~14A6D
RESOLUTION 91-48 I~ROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 22, BLOCK 341 OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
TENr MARLENE AND CASIMIRO EGUIZABAL
Item~14&6E
PJ~0T-UTTON 91-49 P~0VIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~M~I~T OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 10, BLOCK 319, MARCO BEACH UNIT
13 r RICHAKD W. FIELD
See Pages /~/' /34
RESOLUTION 91-50 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 82, LELY COUNTRY CLUB, PALMETTO
DONE~ .SECTIONt A. PAUL GREGG, TRUSTEE
See Pages /~ --/~
·
Item ~14A6G
RESOLUTION 91-51 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 10, BLOCK I1, OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
ON~r 3AM~S P. AND KAREN A. MCCARTHY
Item ~14A6H
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-52 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEME]IT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 8, BLOCK 132, A REPLAT OF PORTIONS
OF BLOC~KS 28, 120, 123, AND 132, MARCO BEACH, UNIT ONE AND UNIT FOUN,
PATRICIA R. MIKELSONr ROBERT D. RICHTERr TRUSTEE
SeePages
It~#14&$I
RESOLUTION 91-53 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 23, BLOCK ?8, OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
3~ JA(~AL ~~ PRESIDENT, P. S. HANU GROUPr INC.
Item~/4A6J
RESOLUTION 91-54 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATeMeNT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 25, BLOCK 251 OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
SIXf AT~ JOHNSONr REGISTERED AGENT FOR SEA CON INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
Ite~
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-55 PROVIDING FOR ASSKSSM]~NT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 34, BLOCK 197 OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
SEVE!Ir HOWARD JOHN SCHULTE
January 22, 1991
RESOLUTION 91-56 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
AB~T~IEI~T OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 32, BLOCK 184, MARCO BEACH UNIT
~LLIAI~ ~HAUGHN~SSYt REGISTERED AGENT FOR TRACT B~ INC. ,
SeePages
Ite~#1¢&6M
RESOLUTION 91-57 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~I~IENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON THE SOUTH 50 FEET, OF THE NORTH 198.5
FEET, OF THE WEST 165 FEET, OF THE SW 1/4, OF THE SE 1/4, OF THE SW
1/4, OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, IN COLLIER COUNTY
FLORIDA; LESS THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYt DAVID WARDt JR.
Item#14A6N
RESOLUTION 91-58 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOTS 31 TO 40, BLOCK 36, INCLUSIVE IN
NEW MARKET SUBDMSION~ MATEOt JESUS AND SALVADOR AYALA
Itm #IU~O
RESOLUTION 91-59 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~I~T OP PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR ANNEX,
BON/FACIO H. ALONSO
Item#14A6P
See Pages /~/-
R~'$OLUTION 91-60 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
JLBAT~I~IIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 14, BLOCK 66, MARCO BEACH UNIT
TWO~ ROBERT RALPH AND CAROLYN A. ATKINS
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-61 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 20, BLOCK 359, MARCO BEACH UNIT
EL~ LEONARD BUBRI AND GARY WEINBERG
It~#14A6R
See Pages
R~SOLUTION 91-62 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~I~IIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 21, BLOCK 225, GOLDEN GATE, UNIT
NO. 6~ THEItESA CORDA
See Pages
!~E~OLUTION 91-63 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~I~I[T OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON MARCO BEACH UNIT 6, BLOCK 235, LOT #4,
OOOPIG£ 81 Page 51
January 22, 1991
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-64 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 33, BLOCK 7, NAPLES MANOR
EXTEN~ION~ JOSEPH J. LAUREN, TRUSTEE UNDER JOSEPH J. LAUREN TRUST
Ite~'14''U See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-65 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATE~T OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 8, BLOCK 333 OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
T~N, ~ J. LISEA
It~ ~14&~V
See Pages . /&3- /~
RESOI~UTION 91-66 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMenT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 28, BLOCK 220, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6,
ROB~I~TJ. AND MAURINE L. LEVINE
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-67 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT ?, BLOCK 352, OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
ELEVEN~ LEONARD J. BUBRI~ REGISTERED AGENT FOR MARCO MEDIA ENTERPRISES
See Pages /~ '7-- /~_~
Ite~ #14A6X
RESOLUTION 91-68 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEmeNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 5, BLOCK 343, UNIT 10 OF MARCO
BEACH SUBDMSION~ F~kRL N. MILLER
SeePages
RE~O~ON 91-69 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABA~ OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 42, BLOCK 188, UNIT 6, GOLDEN
JOHN D. OFFUTT, TRUSTEE
See Pages /7/' / 7~
It~m#14A6Z
R~SOLOTION 91-70 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATemenT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 36, BLOCK 240, GOLDEN GATE, UNIT
NO. ?~ ~D~ARD J. AND LAVERDA L. PELC
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-71 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 14, BLOCK 3?5, OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
TWELV~ VINCENT AND MARILYN A. SOLIMINE
See Pages
Page 52
January 22, 1991
R~OL~TION 91-72 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PtIBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 25, BLOCK ?, NAPLES MANOR
~ETEII~IOIIr HOMARD C. AND IRENE L. ROOL
See Pages
It,s #14A6CC
R~SOLUTION 91-73 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~IENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK 35? OF MARCO BEACH, UNIT
KL~m GEORG~ L.~ JOSEPH AND ROBERT M. MCDONALD
See Pages / '~__~___
Ite~ #14A6DD
RESOLIITION 91-74 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~M~IIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 10, BLOCK 383 OF MARCO BEACH, UNIT
TW~LV~m G~R~E L..~ JOSEPH AND ROBERT M. MCDONALD
See Pages~
Item#14&6KK
R~OLI]TION 91-75 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAIll~DIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK 35? OF MARCO BEACH UNIT
ELEV~.r G~ORGE .L..~ JOSEPH AND ROBERT M. MCDONALD
SeePages ~~
Ite~#14A6FF
RESOLI~rZON 91-76 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEM~IIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 250, UNIT 7 PART --
GOLDEN GATE~ FLORENCE O~CONNOR AND GORDON SHERWOOD
Item#14A6GG
See Page s___~~~~
RIISOLOTION 91-77 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~I~ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 35, BLOCK 6, NAPLES MANOR LAKES,
THE H~NRY OLIVER TRUST, FLORIDA SUNBELT PROPERTIES, INC., AS TRUSTEE
WITH WILLIAM D. cOL~INS, JR.~ PRESIDENT .
See Pages_ff_~_~~
Item #I&A6HH
RA~OUITION 91-78 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMI~NT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABA/II~ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 12, BLOCK 135, UNIT 4 PART --
GOLDEN GATH~ RAYMOND J. AND JOHNANNA M. PRINDIVILLE
Ite~,14A6II
See Pages
R~OL~TION 91-79 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~IIT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 16, BLOCK 110, UNIT 3, GOLDEN
GATH~ ~ S. AND CARRIE J. SZYMANSKI
See Pages
Ite~#14&T withdrawn
83'
Page 53
January 22, 1991
I~e~24B/
ACCEPTANCE OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG GULF SHORE DRIVE FROM
CLYDE C. ~UINBY, TI~USTEK FOR WATERMARK CONDOMINIUM
See Pages~
Item#14B2
R~SOLUTZON 91-80 AND JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA
D~P~ OF ~RTATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF BRIDGE #030121 ON
C.R. 92
Item ffl&B3
STAFF TO PROCEED WITH CONTRACT FEE NEGOTIATIONS WITH AGNOLI, BARBER
AND BRU~ID&GE, INC., AND JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. AS THX NUMBER ONE
RATED FIRM~ TO FULFILL DESIGN, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND PERMITTING
RE(~UIREMI~q$'~S FOR PLANNED FOUR LANING OF 111TH AVENUE AND VANDERBILT
DRIVE ~ RESFECTFULLY
Ite~e14B4
STAFF TO PROCUR~ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO FULFILL DESIGN,
RIGHT-OF-MAY, AND PI~MITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO
SANTA BARBARA BLVD./LOGAN, SANTA BARBARA BLVD., AND COUNTY BARN ROAD;
CIE PROJ~CT~ NOS. 022~ 032~ AND 033
Ite~#14D1
ACCEPTANCE OF THE SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND 30INDER OF EASEMENT FROM
WESTINGHOUSE CO~NITIES AND THE TWENTY (20} FOOT PERMANENT UTILITY
EASEM~IT FROM OAK LAKE SANCTUARY OF PELICAN BAY
Ite~#14E1
FORmaL BID FRC)C~rSS WAIVED AND NAPLES DAILY NEWS SELECTED FOR THE
ADVENTI~EME~T OF THE ANNUAL DELINQUENT TAX ROLL
RESOLUTION 91-81 ESTABLISHING THE EMS OPERATIONS CHIEF, EMERGENCY
SERViCeS ADmINISTrATIVE MANAGER AND EMERGENCY SERVICES EDUCATION AND
QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER POSITION TITLES AND DELETING THE EMERGENCY
SENVICES AIN~/NISTRATIVE OFFICER AND EMS TRAINING OFFICER PAY TITLES
See Pages
STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN ARCHITECTURAL CONTRACT (RF~ #90-1654) WITH
WINSOR/FARICYARCHITECTS, INC., AS THE NUMBER ONE RATED FIRM FOR
ARCHITP~'lq]RAL $~VICHS FOR THE RENOVATION OF COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
BUILDING
Itn#14F1
RESOLUTION ~91-82 RE GRANT APPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION FORM FOR THE
STAT~ OF FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES GRANT AWARD PROGRAM
See Pages ~;~a7=" ~/~
ooo 84'
Page 54
January 22, 1991
Itm#lSF2
~DE~D ACCEPTED FROM THE GOLDEN GATE FIRE AND R~SCUE DISTRICT
TO C~LIER ~ FOR A PORTION OF BLOCK 115, GOLDEN GATE, UNIT NUMBER
· FOR THE MULTI-PURPOSE EMERGENCY SERVICES COMPLEX
See Pages a/S-
BID~90-1617 AMARDED TO ADAMS DEWINDM&CHINERY OF FORT MYERS FOR A
TRACE T~PE DOZE~ IRTHE ANOUNT OF $128,676
THIN~ RE~IN~ & EDUCATION ~ W~TE TI~ G~S ACCEDED ~0M
~ ~DA D~~ OF ~RO~~ RELATION
See Pages ~/7~ j~
Ite~ #14IA
HESO~FI~IO]I 91-83 APPOINTING DORCAS F. HOWARD AND 30SE H. BETANCOURT TO
THE (~.~I~ ~ HOUSING AUTHORIT~
See Page
Ite~ #1431
CEHTIFICJkTES OF CORP~CTION TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESENTED BY THE
1990 TAX ROLL
No. Date
173 1/8/91
176/177 176/178 1/9/91-1/14/91
1990 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
MIS~$ COR!IESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or
referred to the various departments as indicated below:
Letter to Chairman dated 1/10/91 from Robert Pennock, Chief,
Bureau of Local Planning, Department of Community Affairs,
re: response to request for representative at 2/5/91 public
hearing to adopt the proposed Collier County comprehensive
plan amendments. Copies to Nell Dotrill, BCC, Bob Blanchard,
and filed.
Letter to Chairman Hasse dated 1/9/91 from Lewis O. Burnside,
Jr., Director, Division of Housing and Community Development,
Department of Community Affairs, re: Community Services
Block Grant Contract #89SB-54-09-21-01-062. Copies to Nell
Dotrill, Frank Brutt, and filed.
3e
Memo dated 2/2/91 to State, Regional and nocal Coastal
Officials from James W. Stoutamtre, Coastal Zone Management
OOOPAr,£ 85 Page 55
1190-68 1/11/91
January 22, 1991
4e
10.
11.
12.
Section, Department of Environmental Regulation, re: 1991-92
Coastal Management Grant Program. Copies to Nell Dorrtll,
John Yonkosky, Harry Huber, and filed.
Memo dated 12/21/90 to Owners of Domestic Wastewater
Treatment Facilities from Howard L. Rhodes, Director,
Division of Water Facilities, Department of Environmental
Regulation, re: Laboratory Certification Requirements.
Copies to Neil Dorrfll, Frank Brutt, Health Department, and
filed.
Letter dated 1/9/91 to Chairman, BCC from Sharon Collins
Andfade, Environmental Specialist, Department of
Environmental Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No.
111910?85, application for dredge and fill activities by
Norman S. Segal, Trustee. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Frank
Brutt, Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Department of Environmental Regulation Notices of Public
Workshop, Public Meeting and Proposed Rulemaking dated
1/3/90, having appeared in the 12/28/90 Florida
Administrative Weekly. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt,
Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Letter dated 1/10/91 to Chairman, BCC, from Jon M. Iglehart,
Environmental Specialist, Department of Environmental
Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No. 111911045,
application for dredge and fill activities by Cocohatchee
River Trust. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill
Lorenz, and filed.
Copy to BCC of letter by certified mall dated 1/2/91 to Todd
T. Turfell, P.E., from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of
Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural
Resources, re: Notice to Proceed Withheld, Governor and
Cabinet Permit Number: DBS 89-247 CO, Permtttee's Name:
Gulfview Beach Club, Inc. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Frank
Brutt, Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Letter dated 12/28/90 to Collier County from Tony D. McNeal,
Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation,
Department of Natural Resources, re: Public Notice, File
Number: CO-192, Permittee: Westinghouse Communities of
Naples, Inc. Coptes to Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill
Lorenz, and filed.
Copy to BCC of letter dated 1/4/91 to Clifford Crawford,
Director, Parks and Recreation Department, from Tony D.
McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and
Regulation, Department of Natural Resources, re: Notice to
Proceed Withheld, Amendment Permit Number: CO-277 A,
Permittee Name: Board of County Commissioners, Collier
County. Copies to Nefl Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz,
Harry Huber, and filed.
Letter dated 1/4/91 to BCC from Tony McNeal, Engineer, Bureau
of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural
Resources, re: Request for Public Comment, File Number:
C0-293, Joseph P. and Sharon L. Certa. Copies to Neil
Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Public Service Commission, Docket No. 890509-WU, Order No.
23964, Issued: 1/7/91, re Application of Florida Cities
Water Company, Golden Gate Division, for a Rate Increase in
Collier County: Corrective Order. Copies to Nell Dotrill,
Mike Arnold, Ken Cuyler, and filed.
86
Page 56
January 22, 1991
13. Minutes Received and Filed:
Westlake Civic Association Beautification Committee
Meeting of 12/6/90.
Collier County Planning Commission Minutes of 11/15/90
and Agenda for 1/17/91.
14.
Copy to BCC of Preliminary Notice to Contractor dated 1/2/91,
to Douglas N. Higgins, Inc., from A. Duda & Sons, Inc., under
an order given by Douglas N. Higgins, Inc., for sod for the
South Service Area East and South Naples Wastewater
Collection Facilities. Copies to Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
15.
Preliminary Notice to Owner dated 1/7/91 to BCC from
Southeastern Municipal Supply, A Division of Clayton Group,
Inc., under an order given by Douglas N. Higgins, Inc., for
water, sewer, drainage pipes and other related materials for
the South Service Area Effluent Storage Facilities, County
Bid #89-1495. Copies to Steve Camell, John Yonkosk¥, and
filed.
16.
Notice to Owner dated 1/7/91 to BCC from Swiftline Trucking,
under an order given by Carter Contracting, for transpor-
tation and delivery of sand and/or fill dirt and/or stone for
Collier County Services Building. Copies to Neil Dotrill,
Steve Camell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
17.
Notice to Owner dated 1/3/91 to BCC from Saf-T-Green of Ft.
Myers, Inc., under an order given by Service Painting of FL,
for Hoists for the Collier County Court House. Copies to
Neil Dotrill, Steve Camell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
18.
Notice to Owner dated 1/8/91 to Collier County Government
from Acousti Engineering Company of Florida, under an order
given by W. G. Mills, Inc., for labor and materials/carpet
for the Golden Gate EMS Bldg. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Steve
Camell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
19.
Notice to Owner dated 1/10/91 to BCC from Olsen Precast,
Inc., under an order given by N. Cole Construction, for pre-
cast concrete structures and related materials for Collier
Village. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
20.
Letter to County Manager and BCC from L. Joyce Hampers,
Assistant Secretary for Economic Development, United States
Department of Commerce, re: Financial Assistance Award for
Immokalee Airport Industrial Park. Copies to Russell
Shreeve, Neil Dotrill, Sandy Taylor, George Archibald, and
filed.
21.
Letter dated 1/3/91 to Commissioner Hasse from J. M.
Armstrong, Executive Director, West Coast Inland Navigation
District re: Regional Inlet/Pass Maintenance Concept study.
Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harry Huber, and filed.
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 6:50 P.M.
Page 57
January 22, 199!
.JA~S G,"GILE$?,~, C~RK
. ~-,,',-, .....~
.~ '~ ~,,_,,,,~,~ ~ _
': (~ese mfnutes approved by ~he Board on
as presented ~ or as corrected
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO
GOVERNING BOARD(S} OF SPECIAL
DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
oo
Page 58