Loading...
BCC Minutes 05/07/1991 W Naples, Florida, May 7, 1991 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Gollier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:25 P.M. in WORKSHOP SESSION In Building ."F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight VIGE-CHAIRMAN: Michael 3. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Max A. Hasse, Jr. Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: James G. Giles, Clerk; Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk; Nefl Dotrill, County Manager; Jennifer Pike, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Brenda Wilson, Assistant County Attorney; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator; Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator; Tom Whitecotton, Human Resources Director; Mike McNees, Budget Director: Mary Morgan, Supervisor of Elections; Martha Skinner, Public Services Administrator; Jeff Walker, Risk Management Director; Dan Pucher, Fleet Manager; Sandra Taylor, Real Property Director; and Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board. Page May 7, 1991 AGENDA Discussion - Ethics Law Discussion - Strategic Planning - Community Development Administrative Services Budget Management DISCUSSION RE MAJOR CHANGES TO ~ ETHICS LAW Assistant County Attorney Wt]son called attention to her memo of April 26, 1991 to the Board of County Commissioners, outlining four changes to the ethics law as follows: 1. Expands the class of persons who must file financial disclo- sure. 2. Prohibits the solicitation of gifts and honorarium, the acceptance of certain types of gifts over $100 and prohibits honoraria in certain instances. 3. Requires disclosure of certain gifts and honoraria. 4. Directs the 3otnt Legislative Management Committee to recom- mend a code of ethics for lobbyists by September 1, 1991. Assistant County Attorney Wilson pointed out that the only real change to the First Section is that the lobbyists are required to register with each house of the legislature rather than the Joint legislative office. She indicated that this section extends the period of time that a lobbyist can be prohibited from lobbying and a penalty of up to $5,000 has been added. Mrs. Wilson explained that Section Two outlines the types of "gifts" that are included or excluded. She noted that gifts valued at less than $100 do not have to be reported. Assistant County Attorney Wllson reported that Section Three is basically a restatement of the previous Subsection which prohibits unauthorized compensation. Assistant Oounty Attorney Wilson advised that Section Four involves a restriction on the employment of relatives. Mrs. Wilson called attention to Section Five which requires addi- tional legislative employees to file disclosures of financial interests. She noted that these employees include legislative ana- lysts, executive assistants and legislative assistants. Assistant Oounty Attorney Wilson explained that Section Six amends Page 2 May 7, 1991 the provisions to require that the financial statements are confirmed to be public records. With regard to Section Seven, Mrs. Wilson reported that cross- references for clarification have been included that requires all information to be submitted on the forms prescribed by the Commission on Ethics. Assistant County Attorney expressed that Section Eight contains the ma3or change since It has been totally rewritten° She indicated that Pages 6, 7 and 8 of her memo provides substantial detail of Section Eight. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mrs. Wilson advised that the donor is to submit a report with respect to the gift, donation, etc. to the donee who is required to attach that report to the disclosure. She explained that the value of glft is determined by using the actual cost to the donor. She noted that if there was no actual cost to the donor, the value of the gift is to be based on the cost in the market. A discussion ensued relating to receiving tickets for various functions or activities but not using the tickets. Assistant County Attorney Wilson advised that the best course in this regard would be to report receipt of the tickets with an explanation of what was done with same. She explained that gifts that are not required to be reported are as follows: gifts from relatives, gifts prohibited by this Section, or gifts otherwise to be disclosed by this Section. Assistant County Attorney Wilson stated penalties for violation of this Section is punishable by a fine up to $5,000. Calling attention to Section Nine, Mrs. Wilson reported that this ks a new section that addresses "honorarium". She indicated that donees cannot solicit honoraria related to public office or duties; donees cannot acoept honoraria from donors; and donors cannot give honoraria to donees. Assistant Oounty Attorney Wilson noted that Section Ten applies to penalties specifically to the gift provisions; Section Eleven merely el~minates a cross-reference. Page 3 May ?, 1991 Mrs, Wilson advised that Sections Twelve through Fourteen had the term "stipened" but replaced this language with use of the term "honorarium". She indicated that Section Fifteen is another cross- reference. Sections Sixteen and Seventeen as pointed out by Mrs, Wilson clarify that certain local authorities must comply with the provisions of this Act, but does not apply to Collier County. Assistant County Attorney Wilson indicated that Section Eighteen is a cross-reference; Section Nineteen requares that the Joint Legislative Management Committee recommend to the legislature a code of conduct regulating the conduct of lobbyists; and Section Twenty basically provides the effective dates for reporting under the new rules. Commissioner Shanahen requested Information pertaining to restric- tions on campaign gifts. Supervisor of Elections Morgan advised that campaign gifts are addressed in F.S. Chapter 10§ and noted that the maximum amount that may be accepted is $§00. DISG'USSXON RI~ STRA~GIG PLANNING - GOMMUNITY D~"FELOPMENT Community Development Services Administrator Brutt provided a sta- tus report with regard to the implementation of the Growth Management Plan. He advised that Growth Management Planning staff has been moving ahead with the County-wide rezonings, and the Goal is to meet the County-wide residential by January of next year. He noted that notices will be sent out in July and August and meetings will be held shortly thereafter, With regard to exemptions, Mr. Brutt Indicated that staff has handled 390 with 20 more remaining to be dealt with, He pointed out that 50 out of 250 compatibility exceptions have been processed and eight vested rights applications have been received. Mr. Brutt advised that the Golden Gate and Immokalee Master Plans have been adopted and forwarded to DCA and they are challenging some of the input and documentation. He related that staff has provided a letter of rebuttal for a settlement of the points in question. He May 7, 1991 expreseed that there are three studies that need to be done in Immokalee relative to Transportation, Redevelopment and Recreation and staff is moving ahead in a productive basis. Mr. Brutt stated that challenges have been filed Identifying the substandard housing in the County, identifying programs for the relo- cation and placement of housing that may be taken up by any type of government program and evaluating the fees for the impact on sewer, water, roads, etc. He noted that staff is assessing the needs of the low and middle income. Mr. Brutt related that incentives are to be provided to industry and major employers to locate business in Collier County. He reported that an EDA grant in the amount of $584,000 has been received for the utilities in Immokalee and there is a State Department of Commerce grant for road activities in the amount of $500,000. He indicated that notice was received yesterday that a Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $320,000 Is forthcoming for the Polymer film activity that is coming into the County. Calling attention to the Unified Land Development Code, Mr. Brutt recalled that the 12 person committee is actively meeting and working with staff In order to accomplish the October deadline. DISCUSSION ~ STRATEGIC P~ANNING - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Administrative Services Administrator Ochs stated that the Automation Information Systems within Administrative Services is the general support division. He indicated that this operation is respon- sible for managing the information and office automation computer system noting that Barbara Westcott coordinates these activities. He reported that this system began with 12 users linked together to share common Information and word processing technolo~ and today there are 255 subscribers networked together who have access to common data bases in both the Clerk of the Courts system and the County Manager's system. He advised that this system allows an efficient and pr~uc- tire way to transmit information through electronic mall, have direct a¢ces~ to financial information and on-line purchase requisition authority. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ochs advised that there will be an administrative office in Pelican Bay which will remain as part of the system and will be merged with the County's utility billing system. Mr. Ochs explained that Skip Camp directs the operation of Facilities Management, and noted that there were five basic challenges in the strategic plan. He advised that the first challenge was to maintain and update the government facilities in terms of the design standards and this has been accomplished by working with the open office concept, system furniture, emergency management and energy management systems, and a preventative maintenance program. He reported that the second challenge was to implement the 800 MHz non- public safety radio system and this has been purchased, installation of the tower is completed and installation in the vehicles and the mobile bay station is currently taking place. He explained that field testing has been conducted and the ranges exceed the original expec- tations. Mr. Ochs addressed the third challenge of keeping current the 5 year facilities master plan for the Government Center by relating that new facilities have been brought on line to accommodate the office space requirements of the Board and the other Constitutional Agencies. Mr. Camp stated that the next major move that is planned within the Government Genter incorporates re-doing space allocations for Capital Pro~ects, the County Attorney's Office, 1st and 2nd Floors of Building "F", Building "D" and the 3rd Floor of the Health Services Building. Mr. Ochs reported that the last challenge of the strategic plan for facilities was to expand the preventative maintenance program in the building maintenance and repair section and related that a formal maintenance program, staffed with County maintenance personnel relating to the various trades has been implemented this past fiscal year. He explained that in excess of 13,000 hours of preventative Page 6 May ?, 1991 maintenance work on the facilities was performed in fiscal year 89/90. In terms of the strategies for facilities, Mr. Ochs indicated that organizationally, staff must stay on top of the new technologies in the building trade. He stated that the County has large investments in chiller plants, energy management systems, telecommunications and radio systems. Mr. Ochs disclosed that four areas of challenge were identified for Fleet Management. He announced that the first challenge was to develop and implement an automated equipment capital recovery system for the Count¥'s fleet of vehicles. He advised that in past years there has been a capital recovery amortization program for the 200 motor pool vehicles that are managed by Fleet Management but noted that the balance of the stock and heavy off road equipment has not been a part of that management replacement program. He advised that a program has been developed and will be presented as part of the budget submissions this summer to be implemented in October. Mr. Ochs advised that the second challenge was to upgrade and automate the four County fueling sites. He reported that there are statutory requirements that must be complied within the area of fuel dispensing and handling of waste oils, etc. He indicated that during the past year, the Marco Island and County Barn fuel sites have been re-built to bring those sites into compliance with the Statutes. Mr. Ochs announced that Mr. Pucher has Just completed negotiations with the School Board with regard to County employees accessing their fueling facility on North Airport Road. He noted that the ability to use this site will eliminate the down time associated with the vehicles in the northern part of the County needing to come to the eastern end of town to obtain fuel, and in turn, the School Board vehicles would be allowed to obtain their fuel from the County's sites. Mr. Ochs stated that Mr. Pucher is also responsible for managing the Vehicle For Hire Program which is the regulation of the taxi, van and trolley industry in Collier County. He pointed out that in past Page 7 May ?, 1991 years, that program has not been self supporting from the standpoint of the fees that are charged for certificates and decals versus the costs associated with staff time and the overhead to manage this program. He reported that recommendations will be forthcoming with regard to amendments to the ordinance and in Mr. Pucher's budget sub- mission which will substantially increase the fees to enable that operation to be self supporting. Mr. Ochs advised that there were three primary challenges relating to Human Resources. He detailed the major challenge of maintaining an effective and pro active recruitment placement program. He noted that other challenges are to maintain competitive pay and benefit schedules and incentive programs for employees; and to develop and deliver a comprehensive training program so that County employees can keep their ski// levels high. With regard to the pay and beneflt area, Mr. Ochs explained that in October, 1990, the Commission adopted the first overall ad3ustment to the pay plan based on market data since the new pay system was implemented in October, 1988. He advised that the County's turn over rate on an annuallzed basis is running at approximately 7% which is below the average for governments comparable to the size of Collier County. Tom Whitecotton, Human Resources Director, explained that County employees are remaining on the Job much longer than they did in the past. He indicated that 47% of those who leave County employment depart within their first six months but if they remain past the six month period they generally stay at least two years. Mr. Ochs stated that prior to the implementation of the new pay plan in 1988, there was a 19% turnover on an annualized basis and that figure is now 7~. Mr. Whitecotton revealed that exit interviews are conducted with a host of questions and factors as to why the employees are leaving ";~" Cotlnty government and there have been a variety of reasons: relo- '! 11i~1111.' caring or able to benefit themsel. ves in another area. Page 8 May 7, 1991 Mr. 0chs addressed Public Affairs which he manages with Administrative Secretary, Diane Brubaker. He noted that operations include communication with the media, press releases, working on com- munity events, I.e. the March of Dimes and the Drug Awareness program. He stated that the Turkey Tribune is also a part of this operation. Mr. Ochs spoke to the functions of the Purchasing Department which does an excellent Job under the direction of Steve Camell. He advised that there is the constant battle of financial control and giving the operating departments the flexibility they need to get the ~ob done in a minimum amount of time. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Purchasing Director Camell advised that field purchases are those that are less than $500 in value. He indicated that the present system provides that each department director advise the Purchasing Department of the employees that are authorized to execute field purchase orders. He stated that field purchase orders amount to approximately $5 million yearly and noted that there is approximately $120 million tn purchases taking place each year that are in excess of $500. Commtssloner Volpe indicated that a significant amount of money is being spent on these field purchases during a one year period and suggested that a better focus be considered in this regard, i.e. a maximum of $100. Mr. Garnell replied that the purchases are analyzed by the Pllrchasing and Finance Departments, but the one chief distinction relative to the field purchase orders is that the department buying the goods does not need prior approval. He indicated that 15,000 field purchase~rs and 3,000 regular purchase orders are issued each year. He related that all regular purchases are reviewed by his office before they are made and if field purchase orders are to be eliminated for the sake of cost control, there would be a real staffing problem. He remarked that one concept under review is to add one person in the Purchasing Department to focus exclusively on field Page 9 May 7, 199! purchase orders in an attempt to consolidate what is being done with them. He explained that if a 2% or $80,000 in savings could be realized, that would pay for additional staff. Mr. Ochs stated that Mr. Carnell has nine people on his staff and has been operating with that number of people for the past few years. He reported that two of those positions have been on hold for the past few weeks due to the hiring freeze. County Manager Dorrtll indicated that Mr. Carnell's department was one of the first to utilize the use of volunteer retired citizens who are willing to work for free. Mr. Ochs called attention to the Real Property Department, noting that one of the primary challenges is to centralize the procurement and identification of all real property under County ownership and obtaining a centralized data base to keep things current and to explore systems that can be shared on a County wide basis to inventory the properties. He noted that the geo based information system is very expensive and requires cooperation from the Constitutional Officers. He cited that Mr. Coldtng's office runs a completely dif- ferent hardware platform than the offices of the Clerk, County Manager and Sheriff. He noted that the intent is to pull all the pieces together into one hardware platform that will work with the various applications, Mr. Ochs reported that another related challenge Is for the Real Property Department to become involved early on with the operating departments with project designs and engineering in order to avoid delays after the plans have been drawn up. Mr. Ochs indicated that another challenge is the dilemma of what will be done with Airports, County-wide. He advised that Mrs. Taylor and her staff are coordinating with Transportation Services Administrator Archibald to piece meal these facilities in terms of whether County government ports or if there should be a separate airport authority. management, leases, etc. but there has not been a good solution as to is the appropriate entity to manage the air- Page 10 May 7, 1991 Mr. Ochs stated that Risk Management Director Walker has been very busy during the past year bringing the County into a self funded arena in terms of insurance and employee benefits. He reported that work- man's comp, group medical, and property/casualty programs are now self funded. He noted that the self funded approach requires an aggressive loss control program. He advised that $600,000 has been saved during the past year through the self funded program and it is anticipated that there will only be an overall rate increase of §~ in medical premiums for the next fiscal year. He noted that the Gommlssion will be paying 3.5% of the increase and the balance will be paid by -~".~ employees through dependent coverage contributions. Risk Management Director Walker remarked that as of March 31, 1991, the County experienced one auto liability accident in the amount of $600. He related that this reflects well upon the County employees and the way they are driving the Gounty's vehicles. DISCUSSION R~ STRATEGIC PLAI~NING - OFFIGE OF BUDGET MANAGEMENT Budget Director McNees advised that his office has goals in three areas, noting that the primary area relates to the policies, process and the preparation of the budget document. He explained that one Goal is to focus on identifying where the lines should be drawn with regard to tradeoffs. He reported that the goal with regard to the budget document is to continue to achieve the GOFA Award which has been received for the past three years. Mr. McNees stated that another goal is to provide staff reports to Gounty Departments, the Manager's Office and the Board Office. Wlth respect to the Quality Improvement Process, Mr. McNees explained that Doug Gorham has done an outstanding Job in gettinG this program underway and more and more problems will be solved through this process. Calling attention to the Budget for 91/92, Mr. McNees cited that based on what he knows today he believes that there will be an increase over rollback of less than 10~ but this depends largely on what w~11 transplre between now and the end of the year with the non- Page 11 ~ay 7, ad valorem general fund revenues and sales tax and how much will be spent between now and the end of the year from general fund reserves. Oommissioner Goodnight stated that she has had discussions with various Gounty employees with respect to the Q+ Program and they are very pleased with thls program and appreciate the opportunity to pro- vide their input. Mr. McNees indicated that over the long haul, the Q+ Program will reflect that the County is conducting business in a more efficient and professional manner than what has taken place in the past. There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was ad3ourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:30 P.M. Page 12