BCC Minutes 09/03/1991 R Naples, Florida, September 3, 1991
:? LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
.Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
'"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
(Absent)
Patricia Anne Goodnight
Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
· .D~rector; D~bby Farrls, Annette Guevin and Wanda Arrtghi, Deputy
Clerks; Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olltff and Jennifer Pike,
:Assistants to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Frank
Brutt, Community Development Administrator; Fred Bloetscher, Assistant
Ut~lities Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; Leo Ochs, Jr., Administrative Services Administrator;
James Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator; Tom Conrecode, Office
of Capital Pro3ects Management Director; Sue Ftlson, Administrative
Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sheriff's Office.
Page
September 3, 1991
Saunders was absent, as reflected by 4/0 votes ***
i ~.' Cmmiuloner Shanahen ~oved, seconded by Co-~iestoner Hesse and
;"~!'C~Tted unanimously0 that the agenda be approved with the following
1.
Item #16 (B) (1) moved to 9 (B} (2) - Recommendation for
approval of agreement to obtain the services of Joe Fixel as
legal counsel representing Collier County in the Livingston
Road Eminent Domain Suits.
16 (K) (1) - wording change required - the Executive Summary
should read "Law Enfo~'cement Trust Fund" Instead of "Crtmlnal
Justice Trust Fund".
.CON~ENT AGENDA - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED
The ~otion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item
~' S REPORT - APpROVED
The ~otlon for approval of the Clerk's Report is noted under Item
L1A.
· ~4
OF REGULAR BCC MP~TING OF JULY 23, 1991 - APPROVED AS
Co~mlssioner Shanahen moved, seconded by Coaualseioner Hesse and
c~rrted unant~aously, that the minutes of the regular BCC meeting of
July 23, 1991 be approved as presented.
s avzca Aa OS - P SZXTSD
Commissioner Shanahah congratulated the following employees and
~rseented them with Employee Service Awards:
David J. Cormally, Project Review Services - 10 years
James A. Gammell, Utilities/Wastewater Oper. - 5 years
Commissioner Shanahan acknowledged that both Patrick G. Merritt,
Parks and Recreation - 10 years, and Cynthia C. Cormera, Probation - 5
years, were unable to attend todayts meeting.
September 3, 1991
,.~CURTIS S. HALL I~KCOGNIZED AS KMPLOYKK OF THK MONTH FOR SKPTKMBKRr ~99!
Commissioner Volpe recognized Curtis S. Hall, Transportation
Services Division, as "Employee of the Month" for September, 1991. He
expressed congratulations and presented Mr. Hall with a plaque and a
$50 cash award.
d~A- Deleted
~ C. BERETS RE BARRICADES AT NORTH END OF GOODLETTE ROAD -
C~3MMISSIONER VOLFE TO MEET WITH RESIDENTS OF CROSSINGS AT MONTEREY
AND PINK RIDGE SUBDIVISION AND DKTKRMINK WHKTHKR MATTER SHOULD AGAIN
TO ,
Robert C. Berens provided a handout consisting of three pages
entitled "Barricade Issues", copy on file with the Clerk's Office. He
explained that some of the information contained in the handout came
from County records, with the remainder derived from his own measure-
mants and observations over the last several days.
The followfng persons spoke in favor of removing the barricades at
the north end of Goodlette Road:
? ~' Robert C. Berens
* Charles A. Petersen
' *Presented a handwritten five page statement addressed to the BCC.
~' Reasons for removal of the barricades were cited as follows:
Inconvenient to drive around the whole Pine Ridge area In order to get
to the Pavilion area and return, not to mention the gasoline and wear
and tear on vehicles required to do so; safety Issue of fire depart-
:~ment, emergency squad, and law enforcement officers taking longer to
:!!get to area due to present access route; safety issue of keeping roads
closed in case of a hurricane; deputies must use two patrol cars where
there could otherwise be one when looking for suspects in the area; at
a meeting of the Villages of Monterey, we were 100~ in favor of remo-
val of the barricades, and that has no more weight than 90% of those
'~in Pine Ridge favoring the barricades remaining; those are public
streets that we paid for and we want to use them now; and there is not
a barricade in this County except this one.
Page 3
September 3, 1991
The following persons spoke in opposition to removing the barfica-
at the north end of Goodlette Road:
Mark Black
H. Rick Jones, Member of Board of PAne Ridge Civic Association
Arnold DeHart
Charlie Andrews
Jeff Brown, Chairmarl - Pine Ridge Civic Assoc. Traffic Committee
Sally Barker, Secretary - PAne Ridge Civic Association
· Wanted to correct the statement which appeared in the Nap/es
Dally News which reported that Pine Ridge is a gated community when,
in fact, it is not.
$$Within next 30-45 days our committee will have a proposal
.available to the Board of County Commissioners on a traffic flow plan
which ie acceptable to the residents of PAne Ridge.
Reasons for opposing removal of the barricades were cited as
follows: Emergency Services access is not an issue; removal of barri-
cades will negatively impact integrity of neighborhood; do not want to
· . open area up to traffic that will come through to get to the
'Industrial Park on Shirley Street; concern that Orange Blossom Road
~.wtll become a thoroughfare; the barriers were there when most moved
~.~n, so what is the problem with them being there now; emergency
response and hurricane evacuation is not an issue in this matter;
"safety Issue of children, pets and walkers being exposed to the
increased traffic as no bike paths or sidewalks are available in the
area; no street lights for night time safety and increased traffic
.~i~.~ill pose a threat; and endangering the people and pulverizing the
'roads of Pine Ridge is not the optimal solution to the desire for a
~shortcut to the grocery store.
H. Rick Jones reported that at a meeting of the Pine Ridge Civic
Association, 90~ of those in attendance were against removal of the
barricades. Upon questioning by Commissioner Shanahah regarding the
number of personal in attendance at the meeting, he confirmed that
i"i'approx~mately 80 people were present.
Commissioner Volpe acknowledged having met with representatives of
iltha Crossings at Monterey Subd~vision as well as the Pine Ridge
He stated that part of the problem will be solved by the
extension of Goodlette-Frank Road through to Immokalee Road, with the
ultimate solution coming when Vanderbilt is extended through to
Page 4
September 3, 1991
16odlette-Frank Road. He reported having written to Mr. Berens.
Transportation Administrator Archibald stated that the reason
recommends the barricades remain in place has to do with the
,~c0ncept of a much higher volume of traffic using those roads. He
explained that in 1987 when Goodlette-Frank was opened staff saw a lot
of through traffic Go to the very north end of a road that is not
i:complete and, in most cases, ,that traffic made left turns and a high
· Volume of traffic ended up cutting through the Pine Ridge Subdivision.
'.He reported over 23,000 trips daily at Goodlette-Frank Road and Pine
,.Ridge. He predicted that removal of the barricades will result in a
fairly large pex'centaGe of these trips making their way through the
.'Pine Ridge Subdivision. He concluded that this kind of projection of
· ~ traffic concerns lead staff to believe that until such time as the
..:{i'! through traffic on Goodlette-Frank Road can adequately be handled it
is unwise to remove the barricades.
In response to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Archibald reported that
~ithe extension to the north of Goodlette-Frank Road is anticipated to
'be under contract prior to the end of the year. He related there are
permitting and funding problems associated with connecting Vanderbilt
Beach Road between U.S. 41 and Goodlette-Frank Road, but added that it
'i-s currently scheduled in 1993 should the funding materialize.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Archibald stated he is not
a position to comment on the issue of emergency vehicles as it
relates to the subject at hand, but added that he recalls prior
'/~meettngs where experts did address the subject. He relayed his
Vnderstanding that the difference in response time is not great enough
to create a concern on the part of the residents in Pine Ridge.
In response to Charles A. Petersoh's questions regarding an
article that appeared in the paper which purported that staff stated
'.~he barricades will remain even after Goodlette-Frank Road has been
extended to Immokalee, Mr. Archibald confirmed that the decisions to
[<.b~ made should be based upon either the projection of conditions that
will be expected or, if conditions occur that are not expected but do
Page 5
September 3, 1991
& concern for safety, then a decision must be rendered accor-
MXchael Brigham questioned whether it is really felt that 50% of
the northbound traffic on Airport Road will take a detour through
Pine Ridge, to which Mr. Archibald stated that pro3ecttons have been
'done relative to 500 or more trips being excessive. He stated he will
!be happy to provide the report he has with him today to anyone
interested. He proceeded to explain the process for calculating cut
through traffic. He stated that experience back in 1987 indicated
that it was probably in the neighborhood of 50% of traffic detouring
when the road was opened up for a short period of time and continuing
~..~ through the Pine Ridge Subdivision. He added that only 25% of the
20,000 trips on Goodlette-Frank Road will represent approximately
5,000 trips. He explained that adding 1/lOth of that number to the
500 trips currently on the local roads represents a large percentage
Of trips to those local roads.
- Commissioner Volpe stated that his plan is to meet with the resi-
dents of the Crossings at Monterey as well as the Pine Ridge
Subd~vision, perhaps with Mr. Archibald present as well.
Referring to the third page of his hereinabove mentioned handout,
Robert Berens questioned Mr. Archibald's trip numbers, stating that
h~s own research revealed approximately 3,300 trips.
Mr. Archibald related that the report he submitted reflects a
¢oul%t of 921 vehicles on Orange Blossom in December of 1989. He added
that the count 3ust made in April of 1991 reveals an increase to over
3,S00 vehicles. He concluded that the traffic currently taking Orange
~;...~.Blossom and Goodlette-Frank is two-fold in that it includes the res/-
dmnts themselves as well as a lot of people using that route to miss
the intersect/on of Airport and Pine Ridge. He verified that staff's
:concerns are not only for the volume of traffic or the speed of the
!it~affic, but also due to the character of the traffic.
It was the consensus that Commissioner Volpe will meet with the
representatives of the Crossings at Monterey and the Pine Ridge
Page 6
September 3, 1991
LeAone and, after doing so, make a determination regarding
or not this matter should again be presented to the Board of
Commissioners.
~?;E~MMHTH~.--HUMT RKPI~S~ING TAXPAYER ACTION GROUP OF COLLIER COUNTY,
'[ ~'~. ~ A~A ~~ ~~ - NO ACTION T~
Kenneth R. Hunt, Vice President of Taxpayer Action Group of
Collier County, Inc., confirmed that four members of his organization
will address the four areas of concern.
Regarding the Consent Agenda, Ed Shearer stated that the authority
'for same is Resolution 82-77 dated June 18, 1982 and titled "A
'iResolution Establishing a Consent Agenda as a regular part of the
, Board of County Commissioners Meeting Agenda". He read paragraphs 1,
2, 3, 5, and a portion of 6 from said Resolution. He suggested that
.over the past n~ne years there have been a~tempts to hide items of
~<'con~ove~sy ~n the Consent Agenda. He relayed the suggestion of his
,'.j o~ganizat~on that there be a $2,000 cap for m~lmum expenditures.
."Additionally, he requested that, w~enever possible, the names of the
~tem initiato~ and ~ev~ewe~ be placed on the Consent Agenda released
publication. He suggested there should be an understanding bet-
~[ween the Commissioners and staff as to the definition of the terms
,'i!noncontroverstal and routine so the original intent of the Consent
~iAgenda is adhered to.
?' Commissioner Volpe stated that a good faith effort has been made
tO confine the Oonsent Agenda to what it was originally intended to
i.e. for routine noncontroversial items which are of a trivial
nature. He pointed out that members of the public are afforded the
~t'.'ol~portunity to remove items from the Consent Agenda for separate vote
and discussion. He indicated that the suggestion of putting the name
the persons presenting the items is a good one with respect to
y.
Commissioner Goodn~ght confirmed she has no objection to placing a
Page 7
September 3, 199!
l~mit on the expenditures Included on the Consent Agenda or to /den-
the ~tem Initiator and reviewer.
Commissioner Shanahan voiced support for Resolution 82-77 as it
identifies some fifteen items which may or may not be included on the
:onsent Agenda. He stated that items involving major monies should
'11;'~ot be included on the Consent Agenda.
In response to Commissioner Goodntght's questions regarding items
deemed to be "controversial", Mr. Hunt stated that he is referring to
:items which are deemed to be controversial by the public on a whole
i Judging by the ~ledia reporting of same. He confirmed that such items
have been pulled from the Consent Agenda.
Commissioner Volpe stated that the Board of County Commissioners
can only do a certain amount to make information available to the
public and that the responsibility then rests upon the various
'Property Owner Associations and Civic Associations to apprise its
~;/members of the actions proposed to be taken by the County.
,:.?~ John Keschl stated he does not hesitate to discuss any item
,'.appearing on the Consent Agent which concerns him with any of the
Commissioners, and has never been mistreated for doing so.
County Manager Dorrill stated that a concerted effort has been
~ade within the Consent Agenda to more completely explain items and
include the dollar costs. He pointed out that one change occurring
~stnce the original Resolution was adopted is that anyone can now
l(request an Item be removed from the Consent Agenda and presented as
'~art of the staff report, thus, eliminating the need for him to
what may be controversial.
Commissioner Volpe suggested acknowledging, as a Board, that it is
the policy to allow members of the publlc, on appropriate notice
e~ther to the County Manager or any member of the Board of County
ss~oners, to have an item removed from the Consent Agenda for
~-'~Petitions, which are assigned to various planners.
of discussion.
County Manager Dotrill added that the one exception is Land Use
He stated that
Page 8
September 3, 199!
Division A,~nlntstrator is responsible to review, approve and be
to pre~3ent ttema to the Board of County Commissioners.
In reply to Commissioner Hasse, County Manager Dorrlll indicated
he is not oppose:d to listing the name of the Division Administrator on
the agenda.
Commissioner Shanahah confirmed his support for placing the
Department Head's name and phone number on the agenda.
:. County Manager Dotrill suggested it will be better to list the
Division Administrator.
,..'.,. In response to Mr. Hunt, County Manager Dotrill stated that the
~County Manager is required to get either sealed bids and/or quotes on
~.-.'~any item over $6,000. He suggested determining what most past bid
awards have been and report back to the Board of County Commissioners
~n order to determine a cap amount for items appearing on the Consent
:nda.
i?'~ Fred Tartan:, of Taxpayer Actton Group of Collier County, Inc.,
'!"i~uggested that important big dollar items should be put at the front
of the meetings, possibly after the awards, instead at the end of the
meetings.
Commissioner Volpe commented that the suggestion seems to be to
'handle the Count]! Manager's report and related items as the first item
'; on the agenda before getting to the public hearings. He stated he
:does not object 'to complying with such a request.
Commissioner Goodnight confirmed that she and staff have been
~::attempting to su:~vey some of the surrounding counties to determine how
handle their agendas.
.~ In reply to Commissioner Hasse, County Manager Dotrill suggested
!f[il,'~hat informing the public that public petitions will start at either
i~jiP=OO A.M. or 1:00 P.M. will help to alleviate the problem in instances
~'i~iwhere large crowds attend a meeting for a particular item. He
~lained that having designated starting times for these categories
'r~ill eliminate the necessity of them sitting all day awaiting one
Page g
September 3, 1991
Commissioner Goodnight reiterated that she and staff are working
this matter and hope to have additional data to present to the
of County Commissioners prior to the let of October.
Commissioner Shanahah expressed a need to organize the agendas and
streamline them when there are significant and controversial issues
t~':with large numbers of the public in attendance. He stated that a time
;.'Certain is absol%ltely essential for everyone's best interest.
~f.?Re~lard~ng the placement of big spending items on the agenda, he agreed
:they should be addressed as early as possible.,
County Manager Dorr~l] suggested that another alternative ~s to
~! designate from 9:00 A.M. until 12:00 noon for staff reports and
gnate that public hearings will begin promptly at 1:00 P.M.
In reply to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dotrill confirmed
that he has a ceiling of ten public hearings per agenda. He
explained that in times of someone requesting an item be continued it
.-sometimes necessitates having twelve or fourteen petitions as a maxl-
mum due to the continued item having been advertised.
:,:.. Commissioner Volpe suggested that items continued at the request
of the Petitioner should be rescheduled at the convenience of the
Board of County Commissioners in,order to adhere to the ten petition
It was the consensus of the Board of County Commissioners that is
/~a' reasonable approach to the matter.
Dick Losbet, of Taxpayer Action Group of Collier County, Inc.,
s%%l~marized that his organization is requesting that the Board of
'./'~o%lnty Co~missioners revise the order to routinely and uniformly put
the Co%lnty Manager's Report as Section VI of the agenda so that it is
heard after the Proclamations and Awards.
Re~arding emergency items, Frances Barsh, of Taxpayer Action Group
· ' of Collier County, Inc., suggested that in evaluating what is an
~:!femer~ency agenda item, such item must be considered to be detrimental
.tO ~he health, safety and welfare of the general public short term as
· ,opposed to the item having the character of pressure from special
Page 10
September 3, 1991
.'~[interest groups.
.... ' Gilbert Erltchman, of Taxpayer Action Group of Collier County,
Inc., cited exa~ples of what an emergency status agenda item should
be. He suggested that any Item deemed to be an emergency should be
dealt with unanimously by the Board of County Commissioners.
Kenneth Hunt reiterated his organlzatlon's position that when a
state of emergency exists, the Board of County Commissioners' vote
should unanimously reflect that.
7;- Commissioner Shanahah agreed that the Board of County
lionere must be wise in its decision regarding the emergency
Commissioner Volpe stated that trust and accountability goes with
~:the office which the Commissioners hold. He indicated there is no
attempt, in his view, to masquerade anything. He expressed his view
that it should not take anything more than a majority to get an item
on the agenda as an emergency, to which Commissioner Goodnight con-
curred.
sea I~F Clerk ~uevtn replaced Deputy Clerk Parris at this tl~e ''*
Dick ~oeber ~ummarized TAG~s three areas of concerns. stating the
longer range, va{~e costs should be quantified, in particular,
planning and zoning items; all costs for each project should be tden-
'i~i/tified before a commitment is made for Implementation; and Staff
~hould be required to specify costs. He concluded TAG believes the
should be more demanding of Staff on cost quanttftcatton and the
fiscal Impact concerns in these areas.
Commissioner Shanahah Indicated his opinion that It Is absolutely
'essential to have the financial data to effectively do his Job.
Commissioner Hasse agreed it is imperative to have a firm figure
all costs and find out why any changes are made.
Commissioner Volpe mentioned his belief, after having spoken to
the County Manager's Staff, that.there will be a legitimate effort put
to quantify fiscal Impact. He cautioned, however, there
y will be certain aspects of a project that cannot be anttct-
Page 11
· September 3, 1991
ed.
:~i~~. County Manager Dotrill pointed out that a fiscal lmpact statement
is intended only to be a sununary in order to get a quick look at the
various funds and dollar amounts that are in question. He commented
on the routine approval of items as they concern new development,
stating the best time to ask fiscal impact questions is when they are
?; Initially approved for rezoning.
Commissioner Volpe inquired if it is possible to be provided with
a periodic financial statement showing income and expenditures in the
various funds and projects, to be measured against the budget?
Clerk Giles advised monthly financial statements are provided to
division and department directors. Along with having access through
the computer system to any financial information the department heads
or the Board may want, he said, typewritten statements are provided of
the various enterprise funds. He agreed to prepare for the Board a
report for the month of August which will show capital funds. He
noted project tracking is not based on a fiscal year, rather is
Btarted at the beginning of the project and is very voluminous.
County Manager Dotrill agreed to provide budget information
regarding the percentage of revenues received vs what was anticipated
·nd what was expended.
i~:~'.' Clerk Giles suggested a workshop be held with the Financial
Services department and the Board of County Commissioners to ascertain
the types of reports and information the Board is interested in
-seeing. He commented up until four years ago, they were providing a
-sttm~ar¥ level report of all funds which showed department totals by
fund, the total amount appropriated, the total amount expended to
date and the available balance. He said they were discontinued due to
-lack of interest.
~. Commissioner Shanahah remarked times and conditions have changed
past four years and it is essential to have those reports
~- '~einstituted.
This being a discussion item, no action was required.
see l~c~ed: 11=50 A.M. - Reconvened: 12:05 A.M.
Page 12
September 3, 1991
:][~N3~T ON TH~ ST&TUB OF TH~ COLLI~R COU!fTY ROADNAY FINANCING
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald presented an
interim report to brief the Board on the status of activities under
the Collier County roadway financing study. He recalled a four-party
contract was entered into between Collier County and Tindale-Oliver
and Associates, Inc., who are providing the traffic data and systems
analysis; David M. Griffith and Associates, doing the accounting work
'that relates to how an assessment role would be developed for this
;i:~'; pro~ect; and the firm of Nabors, Gtblin and Ntckerson, P.A., who are
'i?~11~t'~vesttgating the apportionment methodologies and creating an
assessment district. He said two principals of Tindale-Oliver and
Associates, Inc., are prepared to review the systems appr.oach which
'/' .;.the County is analyzing in order to provide the basis of not only
~lncreaslnf; the Impact fees, but also making up any other shortfall by
/~the creation of an assessment district.
Steve Tindale with Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc., Indicated
his presentation will cover two basic areas 1) the impact fee and
impact fee update; and 2) the possibility of a benefit assessment pro-
.i~ cess to compliment impact fees. He said there are three variables in
';the impact fee for a specific type of land use, namely, the demand
'that the land use generates, the cost to provide the facility that
:will be consumed and the credit or amount of revenues that facility
· lienstates. He noted Staff and his firm have collected data regarding
i(;i'i'..land uses and have found a very high correlation In Collier County to
Information collected In the rest of the State. He explained Collier
~'Count¥ has the same type of length trip characteristics and the same
type of capture rates. He Indicated the locally collected Information
will be reflected in an impact fee update. He said this will result
!'!/,'in an update of the demand for types of categories and will expand the
number of categories in the Impact fee. He said the second component
is cost. He exp:[atned the current cost of using the Impact fee is
Page 13
~roxtmately $400,000 per lane mlle.
September 3, 1991
He said preliminary findings
itc&te the co,3t of adding one construction mile will be almost twice
In response to Commissioner Shanahah, ~r. Tindale stated the tran-
sition to a cost of $1-mtllton per mile has happened in the past six
i..i~¥ears. He said estimates by communities and the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) are due to the cost of right-of-way, structures
and purchasing a. silver of land, not the true cost of an acre of land.
~ He stated those numbers are usually not reflected correctly in the
~.! impact fee equations.
~ Mr. Tindale advised a credit is provided for in the equation, and
~'ihis firm Is re-evaluating the amount of gas taxes as well as computing
~ ~': :~ ·
a capital construction credit for each different development type.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Tindale stated the cost of
:'.constructing a new road is much cheaper than adding two lanes to an
?~.":~xtattng two-lane roadway.'
Mr. Tindale continued with a presentation of graphs. He said the
first graph shows the growth An travel in five-year increments from
1980 to 2000, and the vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for that same
'period. He stated the statistics give an indication that the base
amount of iraill: handled 10 years ago is substantially different than
what will be handled by the year 2000. He explained the graph was
calculated by including every link of roadway on the Collier County
network and multiplying the volume times the length of road, resulting
in the total VMT. He commented the average dally traffic on a typical
''weekday increased from 1 million to 4 million VMT from 1980 to 1990,
which is a reflection of the high growth rate in Collier County. He
'explained the second graph utilizes the VMT divided by the vehicle
miles capacity (VMC}, which is the physical capacity of road times
.length. He said the graph indicates the system was using 20% of the
VMC An 1980, 42~ in 1990 and Is projected to be using 65~ by 2000. He
presented four additional graphs showing the Volume:Service Capacity
Ratio for road conditions in 1980 and 1990 as well as projected con-
Z0
Page 14
September 3, 1991
~:~ditions for 1995 and 2000.
Commteelone~ Volpe commented there are certain road segments that
for reasons of ,=oncurrenc¥ are required to be funded or under contract
by 1994. He tn~utred how the concurrency issue impacts on the analy-
sis being done?
Mr. Tindale replied if the road network is funded over the next 20
.years and the County shows it has control over it, negotiations may
be possible with the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to lower
i; :the Growth Management Plan adopted levels of service on certain road
segments.
Commissione2~ Volpe suggested this type of analysis will provide
~Coilier County t~ith the data base to negotiate with DCA if that beco-
necessary.
:!i?i~/! Mr. Tindale agreed, reiterating if Collier County has a complete
plan to show this process and what will happen in five-year incre-
ments, as well ~ts how it is being managed and financed, there may be
.some latitude on some roads.
In answer t¢) Commiss~oner Volpe, Mr. Tindale stated the final
report is expected to be completed by the end of October.
Commiesione~' Volpe communicated the Growth Management Plan amend-
ment process is scheduled for the end of September and this report
will not be finial until one month later. He remarked the C.I.E.
.:i:~equires an identifiable funding source and he will find it very dif-
ficult to vote on amendments to the C.I.E. on a funding source that
does not exist.
Jeff Perry, Growth Planning, stated the recently adopted AUIR will
be within the C.I.E. update to be presented at the transmittal hearing
.iin September. Be said that is the fully funded program from gas tax
and ~mpact fee revenues as they are presently projected and the spe-
cial assessment district as the deficit funding source. He indicated
there may be an option available, during the final adoption hearings
after the amendments are returned from DCA, to make financing changes.
?,: 'He noted the actual adoption of the C.I.E. amendments does not take
Page ! 5
September 3, 1991
until January, 1992.
,'i Commissioner Shanahan suggested Hr. Perry investigate if there is
possibility for delaying the amendment process until the final
~,//Feport is received. He agreed it will be difficult to consider a
taxing district or other alternatives without having the total
package,
-.'Mr. Perry concurred, however, advised that many changes that take
~l&ce occur after the public hearing for transmittal of the amend-
i~i/~ents and prior to the final adoption in January.
<i~.~ . This being a discussion item, no action was required.
?(:'i'RECO~ENIIATION ].~R APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT TO OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF JOE
:~F~L A~ LEGAL COUNSEL ~S~ING COLLIER CO~ IN ~ LIVINGSTON
R~ ~~ ~IN SUITS - ~O~D
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained this
item concerns a contract with Joe Fixel, whose firm has been repre-
senting Collier County on several condemnation cases. He said this
Lcular issuE: deals with the east/west segment of Livingston Road.
~:;:He noted countersuite are pending and Staff is recommending the Board
allocate approximately 75 hours of services from this specialist to
assist the County in th~ Eminent Domain proceedings. He indicated the
.f[iexpectatlon that the cost will be associated with either the M.S.T.U.
part of a developer commitment.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, ~r. Archibald stated four parcels
Involved, however, two of the parcels are in the process of con-
.ii: Sidering being dismissed from the suit. The other two parcels, he
involve obtaining an agreement with the developers and may
'~proceed with dropping them from the current suit in Circuit Court. He
stated that is specifically why the assistance of special counsel is
needed tn this case. He concluded It is not expected that 75 hours of
S~rvtcee will be necessary, but he is allocating up to that amount.
i?,/~".The followin:; people spoke concerning this item, stating all
expenses should be built into the hourly wage; no further taxpayer
money should be ~pent on the east/west segment of Livingston Road
Page 16
September 3, 199!
the agreement with the developer is finalized; and concern with
this item having been placed on the Consent Agenda:
Gilbert Erlichman
i~'!~- ' Fred Tarrant Frances Barsh
Mr. Archibald stated Mr. Fixel has never charged for travel expen-
}~[.ses, only for actual work expended on each project.
~,,-' ' *$s ~md: 1:50 P.M. - Reconvened: 1:55 P.M. at which
ti~e Deput~ Clerk Arright replace Deputy Clerk ~uevtn ***
~dsetoner Goodnight left the meeting at this time.
Dick Leebet, speaking for TAG, questioned why the County Is
:spending money for staff time on the north-south section of Livingston
~i,ii.'Road when they inferred they would not?
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that
there are many people who will be effected by the north-south section,
and while they are inquirinG from the County what the status of the
project is, staff at the same time does ask if they are willing to
'i.iiaell their property and at what price. He noted that it is important
to keep this type of dialogue open with these owners because there may
be cases where they would like to donate their land, and the County
i'""could accrue a great deal of benefit from these conversations.
~,~mtmioner Shanahmn moved, seconded by Commissioner H&see and
· .=azTI~ S/O (C~Hiseloner ~oodnight not present), to approve the
~t t~ continue the services of the law firm of Joe W. Fixel,
P.&. of Tm~mhm~see, Florida, ~ legal counsel representing Collier
~t~ in the Livin~ton Romd E~tnent Do~ain smite.
Page 17
September 3, 1991
NO. 10 (FINAL) TO TH~ CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH GULF
Lq!~C. FOR lq~ "SOUTH COUI~I~ I~GI:ONAL ~I~'I'~'~A~ ~'I'IqE~T
FACI~!T~ IN T~ A~OUNT O~ ~21,992 - A~PROV'gD ,,,
Assistant U':tlittes Administrator Bloetscher informed that Change
Order No. 10 is the final change order for the South County Regional
~{~ Wastewater Treatment Facility which will take care of some minor
'" items.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Bloetscher advised that the
iproblem has been rectified at the subject facility which the proposed
<f:.costs reflect.
..... Mr. Bloetscher responded to Commissioner Volpe by stating that
[th the proposed final change order the County is accepting the pro-
~ ::" Co~tsstoner Volpe commented that he understood that Gulf
:Conerectors, Inc. were not to be used to make the corrections. Mr.
Bloatschar expla:[ned that aT the advise of the independent expert the
County used to evaluate the repairs needed, the County directed Gulf
Constructors, Inc:. to have the repairs completed using a subcontractor
~ ' .,that the County identified for them.
Ce~iuloner Goodnight returned to the ~eettng at this rise.
Commissioner Volpe expressed his uncertainty in agreeing to pay
this money when there is litigation pending regarding the repairs that
were necessary for the completion of this facility. Mr. Bloetscher
Informed that the. cost for the fix and delay are accruable to Consocr
Totwnsend to whom funds are being withheld, and the County is waiting
~ .at this time for them to take the next step. County Attorney Cuyler
~oncurred.
C~ileloner Shanahah ~oved, seconded by Co=-isstoner Hasse and
carried 4/0, that the final C~ge Order No. 10 to the construction
.,,..contract with ~ulf Constructors, Inc. for the South County Regional
~:'/ ~~w~ T~e~ent Facility in the ~mount of 821,992 be approved.
Page 18
September 3, 199!
OF FROPKRTY LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTTON OF U.S. 4! AND C.R.
951 FOR & MASTER PUMP S?ATTON 3. :~8 STT~ - APPROVED
Assistant Utilities Administrator Bloetscher advised that the
purchase of property located near the intersection of U.S. 41 and C.R.
?' '951 for a Master Pump Station 3.18 is pursuant to the Capital
('ii]Improvement Element 915. He reported that the design is nearly
complete for this project and will be constructed in FY 1992.
i'!;'i;i' In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Bloatschar explained that
i,~"the proposed station will receive some gravity sewer; however, will
?%j.i'repump sewer from the Marco Shore Unit 30 and the eastern portion of
'."': .U.S. 41.
Cc~m:iemtm~ S~anahan ~oved0 ~econded by Co--isaloner Hasee and
· caz~ig by 4/0, t~t the purchame of the .65 acre site located near
the ~S~tel-~ectton of U.S. 41 and C.R. 951 for Ma~ter Pu~p Station 3.18
: .~ ~ ~t of $92,500 be approved.
Page 19
September 3, 1991
~102723, BI~OE~I~AGK SHRVICES FOR SECTION 125 C~IA P~
Administrative Services Administrator Ochs recommended that RFP
· 91-1723 be awarded to Allied Group Insurance Services, Inc. for bro-
'~:~ kera~e services for the implementation of Section 125, Cafeteria
7:~ Benefit Plan. He informed that Section 125 of the Internal Revenue
' Service Code allows employers to offer employees certified benefits
~ for their purchase with pre-tax dollars. He noted that the primary
~. adv~taGe to the County Is In reduced employer contributions to FICA;
~.: .~d for the employee, actual net ~ncrease ~n pay,due to pre-tax
"dollars bein~ used for FICA and Federal Income Taxes. He explained
that on July 26, 1991, s~x proposals were opened and evaluated by the
select,on co~tted who is recommending Allied Group Insurance
~. Services, Inc. based on their expe~ience in implementing and designing
.-%.~ .these t~es of plans as well as their cost and compliance with the
'.~ ' provisions of the RFP. He stated that the plan is scheduled to ~o
~nto effect on January 1, 1992, and prior to that date staff will pre-
sent to the. Board for approval a Broker of Record AGreement and a
~final pl~ design. He pointed out that the consultant would be com-
pensated through co~sslons on individual sales of supplemental pro-
:'~(.~dBcte at the option of the employee.
. In response to Commiss~oner Hasse, Mr. Ochs explained that this
~ pr~marily assists the County in savlng money for the employers
portion of the co~tribution toward FICA and allows employees to
at their expense supplemental benefits- supplemental life
insur~ce, a vision plan, etc.
') Mr. Ochs informed in response to ~o~issioner Volpe that the plan
.'w~l~ be offered to all a~encfes of the County. He added that the
~e for three years which aids ~n obtaining reduced com-
(, .:~ In response to a list of questions by the Finance Director
2e~ardln~ the selection of Allied Group Insurance Services, Inc. which
Page 20
September 3, 1991
.ded to Mr. 0chs by Commissioner Shanahen, Mr. 0chs stated
'(.that of the point totals, A/lied Group Insurance Services, Inc. scored
98 out of a 100 with the next closest firm being at 76 points. He
related that ae to their experience, they have implemented over 70 of
these plans. He affirmed that there is not an up front price to the
'.Cotmt¥, but rather commissions if the employees choose to buy any
.given product line.
Risk Management Director Walker informed that the committee was
composed of a representative from the Purchasing Department, John
:t McDermott; Kate A/pert, Senior Risk Management Analyst; Administrative
:.'Services Administrator Ochs; Marsha Litsinger, Senior Human Resources
,Analyst, and himself.
!... In addressing a concern expressed by Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ochs
that the Risk Management Director will manage the entire
[p~ogram on behalf of the County, and the Employee Benefits Committee
l~i!!!W$11 work together to formulate the exact plan design which the
?"employees have requested to be incorporated into the plan.
C~esioner Shanahen moved, seconded by Commissioner Hawse and
catt-r~d 4/0, that RFP ~91-1723, Brokerage Services for Section 125
C~feterl& Plan I~le~ntat~on, ~ awarded to Allied Grip I~r~ce
; .. Emergency Services Administrator Reardon provided as an update on
the Medical Examiner Interim Agreement that all requirements have been
. 'accomplished with the exception of the short term agreement with Dr.
~:. Rlonda which staff ls working to provide an acceptable agreement to
~.' all parties. He advised that in the Interim until a written agreement
~':~' developed ~d considered by the Board of County Co~ssioners
'egardlng Dr. Rlonda's financial compensation, staff has established
;"' he= as a temporary full-time county employee.
In response to Commissioner Hesse, Mr. Reardon noted that the
~ 'Co~ky is currently functioning as the employer for Dr. Rtonda and her
September 3, 1991
until a long-term solution is developed. He explained that
Itaff ts examining whether the contractual arrangement which the
'County had with Dr. Engstrand or developing another County department
would be best operationally and financially for the County.
Mr. Reardon affirmed in answer to Commissioner Hasse~s question
that Dr. Rionda has agreed to the salary of $88,000 annually until the
.'.long-term agreement has been reached.
Mr. Reardon advised in response to Commissioner Volpe's question
. on whether Dr. Rionda will be compensated for this interim time as
~,acting Chief Medical Examiner, that this discussion has not been
.entertained.
~.':,~ ~~r Ha~ee moved, ssconded by Co~tasionsr Shanahah and
'~[':':.'=eZTJ~ 4/0, tO accept the update and recognize staff's action in
the Intent of previou~ Board direction.
Capital Projects Management Director Conracode recommended appro-
val of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. to provide professional
for the design of the proposed improvements at Barefoot Beach
:!~.:Park. He noted that on May 28, 1991, the Board of County
Commissioners approved Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. as the
~'.consultants for the overall master planning of Collier County's pot-
Ion of the ~otnt beach front improvements proposed with Lee County.
informed that the proposed contract Is based on a preliminary
~rovement plan which the Board approved on June 18,-1991. He added
that estimated construction cost for the proposed improvements is
~[i'$85,?70 which the State has approved a grant of 75~, or up to $71,000,
i f. with the money available for the County's use until February 1, 1992.
.'He. disclosed that the current budget established for Collier County is
t'nlthe amount of 860,000 which t~ the County~s share of the total pro-
'1. J¥ .
act cost.
~'q, Co~lesloner Volpe potnted out that this contract issue is tied to
Page 29
September 3, 3991
interlocal agreement with Lee County.
Nr' Conracode stated that there are two issues at hand with one
being that there is a definite delineation between the Lee County and
the Collier Gounty side of the park and the second being that there is
~ih~&~.February 1, 1992, deadline for the use of the State grant. He
-explained that certain decisions need to be made now to start the
design work in order to receive the grant money.
Commissioner Hasse inquired as to what impacts the improvements
will have on the exit from the Collier County side of the Beach to
Bonita Beach Road?
Assistant County Attorney Manalich stated that as a result of the
'Lee/Collier Counties Workshop on August 29, 1991, the plan is to have
an entrance and exit on the Lee County side as reflected in Section 5
of the proposed Interlocal Agreement which is Item #10A on today's
~'- : agenda. He provided to the Board a copy of a modified Section 5 of
this agreement (not provided for the record}. He noted that as stated
in Section 5, "Lee County shall connect the Bonita Beach parking lot
to Collier County's Barefoot Beach parking lot;" this is what is con-
templated for the project. He explained that under the terms of the
document provided to Collier County by Lely Development,
Collier County would forfeit their present access made available by
this easement if this new access is allowed. He added that
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald also referenced the
fact that the Department of Transportation seeks to avoid any access
,~'i.~ to the Park from the curve on this section of Bonita Beach Road.
Commissioner Hasse questioned what would be wrong with leaving the
access where it currently is?
County Manager Dotrill advised that there is a temporary easement
by Lely Development providing access from Lely Barefoot Beach
to the Collier County pamk, and he suggested that the County
should negotiate with Lely Development for a permanent easement from
Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard rather than from Bonita Beach Road.
Mr. Manalich reiterated that the one proposed access from Bonita
September 3, 1991
: ~.~each Road would be from the Lee County side and is intended to con-
,¢t to the Collier County parkinl] lot; however, language needs to be
:~dded to the agreement to assure Collier County that it will always
retain access to its beach from the Lee County proposed access.
Commissioner Shanahan emphasized that Collier County also wants to
L:retain the potential other access point which should be included as
part of this added language. Mr. Manaltch agreed.
Commissioner Volpe concurred that he does not want to sign an
?'i.',.Interlocal Agreement without being assured that Collier County will
· have the flexibility of the other access points,
~!~:~ County Attorney Cuyler clarified that if the proposed Interlocal
,~!~Teement is siftned the County will loose its access from Lely
?. ~ ,"
Barefoot Beach Boulevard to their beach parking lot because another
~- access is provided to the parking lot from Lee County.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dotrill
~:.:~ explained that there are two advantages to having access to Collier
parking lot through Lee County's access. He advised that the
first advantage is that Lee County's parking lot is larger than
· . Collier County's, therefore, there would be more parking available to
~:.; Collier County residents. He noted that the second point is that Lee
ii~, County has made the concession to place the bath house facilities in a
..-location to accommodate Collier County which is not where they would
",'normally have located them.
', In order to address the concerns expressed, County Attorney Cuyler
that the agreement could be structured to reflect that in the
~'~',.event that Collier County negotiates and keeps the r~ghts to its
current easement, then there shall be shared access between Lee and
!i/ Collier Counties. He explained that this restriction in the agreement
could cause a concern for the design of the park because of the
iinknown; however, the consultant can advise as to how much of the
:'dmsl~n collid be completed without this factor known.
After concerns expressed by the Board, County Attorney Cuyler
~,~ ~ggested that Item #10A be continued for a week to allow time for the
Page 24
September 3, 1991
staff to confer with Lely Development Corporation regarding
possibility of Lely releasing their rights on the subject ease-
~ent.
County Manager Dotrill Indicated that this will be investigated.
Mr. David Ward, Vice President of CAB, expressed his concerns
about who would be paying impact fees for the sewage drainage that is
proposed in the agreement. He added that the Lely PUD indicates that
Lely will be responsible for publlc beach facilities. He pointed out
- that the Lely PUD also provides that Lely Development is responsible
for constructing a left turn lane at the "project entry road per DOT's
;.'::desi~n requirements as part of the initial project road improvement,"
well as paying their share of a traffic light at the same entry
~ road. He emphasized that the citizens of Collier County are owed
'these items. He noted further that Collier County should keep the
present access from Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard and referred to a
i'ij~')sentence in the Executive Summary which indicates the easement reverts
back to the Lely Development Corporation, but feels this is not a
lega] correct statement.
After some discussion, County Manager Dorrtll noted that Lee
will not be charged an impact fee, and the determination of how
the impact fees will be paid is being reviewed at this time.
County Manager Dorrlll concurred that a decision should be made on
Item #9H! in order to be eligible for the State grant, and Item #10A
be deferred for one week to allow staff to meet with Lely Development
re~;ardin~; the easement.
. .0ommtssionsr Volpe suggested that the County Attorney insert
lan~age in the Interlocal Agreement which would ensure that the Joint
access with Lee County ts contingent upon the results of the
discussions with Lely Development Corporation regarding the easement
providing the Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard access to the beach.
a' Mrs. Marge Ward, President of CAB, commented that it was hoped to
have the renovations on the Lee side of the park completed by
November, 1991, and expressed her concern regarding obtaining the
Page 25
September 3, 1991
for the project from the State if the Interlocal Agreement Is
'n~ approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. She
./i.'potnted out that without an agreement for the sewage hookup between
Lee and Collier Counties, further delays in State approval may be evl-
i[[-:. Co~tsstoner Volpe emphasized that it Is the consensus of the
i/Board to provide an Interlocal Agreement, but with the assurance that
icollier County will have access to the Park from the Collier County
i!~[~atde. He suggested that staff confer with Lee County staff to verify
.~i~ 'whether they need a statement from Collier County regarding the sewage
hookup with which Collier County is in complete agreement.
.... ~~t~l~ Sh~n~han ~ovad, aaconded by Co,,~tsatoner Volp~ ~nd
:~t~ 4/~, to ~~ t~ Contract with Corral ~g~n~rtng
~~, Inc. in the ~t of 811,950, wlth the
that therewill be no interconnecting accesa fros Collier C~unty to
· Lee Count~/untl! tbe Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard acceee easesent
Co~et~toner Ooodntght left the meeting at thtf tt~e.
Page 26
September 3, 1991
k~"JkGJ~lN~rf FOR THE COOFKRATIVE EFFORT TO MASTER PLAN
· ~c~! P~ (COLL'r~) ~ BONITA S~c~ PMu~ (L~.Z) - CO~I~D
*;'(~.~9[~0/91
This item was discussed under Item #9H1.
~4mm/a~lo~a~ $hanaha~ moved, seconded by Commissioner Ha~e and
:*:,'11:['~Aod S/0 (C~umlmmioner Goodnight not present), to continue until
the cooperative effort to Banter plan Barefoot Beach Park and Bonita
Beach Park, to allo~ staff the o~portunity to meet with Lely
):Development Corporation regarding the access euement on Lely Barefoot
Boulevard.
J/Ill & Ill2
91-329 THROUGH 91-333 - ADOPTED
0ommAmmloner Huoe moved, seconded by ComAsmAsher Shanaham and
unm~tmmmly, that Budget Ammduents 91-329 through 91-333 be
-**** Comm/~ton~r Shanaham moved, seconded by Commissioner Huse
m~d c~,'g, te~du~mtmou~l¥o that the following iteu under the con-
mt agemd~ be approved and/or adopted: ***
OF LRRKVOCABLK LETTER 0F CREDIT TO GUARAHTKE COMPLETION OF
PERMIT NO. 59.192 'BKRKHHZRK LAKES, PARCEL K'
See Pages ~
Xt~m ~16A2
AOCEFT~2~CK OF ~RANT OF L~/~E MAINTENANCE, D~AINAGE, AND ACCESS
~ FROM COAST CO~UNITIES CORPO~J,TION AND M.K. DEVELOPERS, INC.
TO ~LOCAT~ AN EXISTING TEMPO~Y D~AINAGE EASEMENT
See Pages
~ON 91-543 GRANTIIIG PRKLZMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF ROAI:R~AYo
:, ~Z~N~E,, NAT~R AND SKWL'R IMPROVEMIghTS FOR FINAL PLAT OF 'TOLLGATE
~ I~SE T~O# - WI~ STIPULATIONS
1. Accept Maintenance Bond as security for maintenance of
infrastructure until BCC grants final acceptance of all
. Improvements.
2e
Authorize Chairman to execute Maintenance Agreement for
Preliminary Acceptance and Resolution authorizing preliminary
acceptance.
Preliminary acceptance of improvements will not become effec-
tive until water and sewer faci ~*ies have been conveyed to
Collier County Water-Sewer Direct.
~ O~P'O; Page 27
;' September 3, 1991
All required sidewalks An Phase One and Phase Two will be
Installed prior to final acceptance of Phase Two.
See Pages
R~SOLUT~OIf 91-844 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LXEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
.&B&~ OF FOBLXC l~lS~lb'~ ON L(FT 21 OF THE PIN~ GROVE SUBDIVISION,
S~TIOIJg, TOWJ~A3~P 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, LOCATED IN I!~O]~&LEE
SILAS mLcoN ............
See Pages ~
91-548 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMB3FF OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
ABATBS~IJTOIPFUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 1, BLOCK 176, UNIT 5 PART --,
~,~A,T~, ~ D. CINADKR Aim ALICE V. ClNADER
See Pages
'rt~ ~16A4C
H:~SOrdUTXON 91-546 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMKN*f OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~J~!FFOF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LELY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP, TRACT L,
W~LLT~M~N. CHAIL~A AJrD ZACK C. HELMS, SOLE PARTNKRS, FLEETWOOD
ASSC)CXAT'KSm A..SKNKRAL PARTNNI~EIP
See Pages /
Item #16A4D
]~SOLUTION 9:1-547 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMINT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
ABATIMINT OF PUBLIC NUISJLRCE ON LOT 12, BLOCK 268, URIT ? PART --
GOY,,D~N GATEra L!~E R. H'NF~RING AND ADELE O. HERRING
E~FTX~ 91-548 PROVIDING FOR Jt~SESSI~3ET OF LIEN, FOR TR~ COST OF
A~B--'~B~IT ~ ~XC NUXSJLRC~ ON ~ NOR~ 1/2 OF L~ 8 ~ ~ S 1/2
O~ ~ O, ~ 18, N~KS ~OR ~S, ~LLY R. Mc~K ~ ~
· Item
':':RB:S(3~sUT~OBr 91-549 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIKN, FOR ~ COST 0F
~ ~X~ ~D~SXON~ ~LDX~ ~SON
~ Xt~ ~26A~
91--550 PROV3[DXNG FOR ASSKSSMKHT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
OF PUBLIC NUXSANCE ON LOT 5, BLOCK 54, NAPLES PARK
UNiT NO..4, NOKT~ N. W~LLIAMS . .
See Page.
.R~80LIFf~O~' 91-55:1 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSlqKNT OF LXKN, FOR ~ COST OF
~~ OF ~XC ~X~ ON L~ 35 ~ 36, N~LKS P~
Page 28
0 ooo,, 88'
September 3, 1991
se, Pa,es II1'
01-552 FROV/DZNG FOR &SSESS~I~IT OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
IRYBLIC NUIBANt~ ON LOT 21, BLOCK ?, NAPLES SOUTH, UNIT 2,
· /tm,16A43
See Pages
':' .RESOLOTZON 91-553 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
-aBaTIMZrr Or PUBLIC ,OISANC~ ON LOT a0. W~LLOW ,ES?. THOMAS EOHAUSEI.
K~I~ A~lrf, BRIDGESTONE BUI. LDERS.. & DEVE. LOPERS, INC.
See Pages , / /,~'~" //~ .
RESOLUTION 91-554 PROVIDING FOR ASSF~SM~NT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
ABATB~JFF OF POBLIC NUISANCE ON ALL OF RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT TWO,
LOT 40,, STAIFFON ,. GKDVILLAS, R~GIST~R~D AGENT, CHAHPAGN~ RFJkLT~ &
See Pages
PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~:,~~OFPUB~ZC NUISANCE ON ar.~ OF RIVIERA GOLF EST&TES, UNIT TWO,
~T. ANTO~W. GKDVILLAS, Ir~GISTKR~D AGENT, CH&NPAGN~ R~ALTY &
:R~OLUTZON 91-556 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
A~&T~M~IT OF ~IC NUISANCE ON ALL OF RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT TWO,
TOT 412, ~TA~F~N W. G~DVILLAS, REGISTERED AGENT, C~JLMPAGN~ REALTY &
See Pages ,/,,~ /- / ~. A
· lt~ #16A4N
I~SOLOTION 91-557 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSM~,,.TT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
'ABATIS~IIT OF FUBLIC NUISANCE ON ALL OF R'£VIKRA GOLF ESTATES UNIT TWO,
LOT499, ~TANTON W. GEDVILLAS, R~GISTEP~D AGenT, CHAMPAGN~ R~ALTY &
'~' See Pages /~ --./~
~i-~ :mor, u~og 91-s60 PROVIDXNU FOR ASsEss~Fr OF LIEN, FOR THE cost OF
· ~B&T~ITOFF~BLZC NUISANCg ON ALL OF RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT T~O,
~ 448, ~TA~IT~WW. ONDVILLAS, ~GIS~D AG~, ~A~
01--559 ~DZ~ ~R ~~ OF LZ~, ~R ~ CO~ OF
~ ~IC ~S~ ON ~ OF R~ GOLF K~A~ ~T
September 3, 1991
, ~TA~ITO!I W, G~DV~LLA~, REGXST~RED AGENT, CHANPAGNE REALTY
See Pag.s . .
91-560 FROVZDZMG FOR JI~SESS!,~[NT OF LZ~, ~R ~ COST 0F
~ ~IC ~I~ O~ ~ OF R~I~ GOLF ~TA~S ~T ~,
See Pages ./~.~-- /'~ O
l~fTO~ 91-661 FROVlDING FOR ASSE-~SI~Tr OF LIEN, FOR TI~ COST OF
Z~T 44~, ~TAJlTO~ W. GEDV~LLAS, REGTSTERED AGENT, CHAHPAGI~ REALTY &
Tt~ ~1~4S
See Pages
~OLUT~ON 91-562 PROVIDING FOR A~SI~SSHKNT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
AB&I'EN~]IT OF FUBLTC NUTSAlICE ON ALL OF RTVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT TWO,
LOT 490, ~TA..~TON W. G~'DVTLLAS, REGISTERED AGENT, CHAHPAGN~ IV~.ALT~ &
See Pages
Ttem ~1~4T
It~OLUTION 91-56S Ptt0VIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~T~N~T OF PUBLIC NUISANC~ ON ALL OF RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES UNIT TWO,
~ 4~9, ~T~W. (~q~ILLAS, REGISTERED AGENT, CHAMPA~ REALTY &
Xtlm ~1~4U
See Pages
FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
NUISANC~ ON ALL OF RIVIERA GOLF E~TAT~S UNIT T~O,
G~DV~LT.,A~, REGISTERED AGENT, CHAMPA~ REALTY
· Xtem~l~&4V
I~OLOTI0~ 91-665 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSM~]~T OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~T~T OF PUBLTC ~IS~CE 0N L~ 8, BLO~ 4, N~LES ~OR ~DITION,
See Pages
~O~UTIO~ 91-666 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
· B~TH~TOFPUBLTC NUISANCE 0N ~ ~IVIDED 14/15~S I~ST IN:
~ O~U~ (SE 1/4) OF THZ NOR~ST O~-QU~TER (~ 1/4)
~ ~ 0F ~ S~T O~-QU~ER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 1~, T~SHIP
50 ~, ~ 26 ~ST, COLLI~ CO~, ~ORIDA, ELI ~ON,
~~ A~ ~R EL~ D~LO~ CORP.
Page 30
See Pages
'to ~9B2
September 3, 1991
',~tK~FF ~D RIGHT-OF-MAy ACQUISITION FOR C.T.K. PROJECT NO.
.OFI~C~ ~,~C~ AT DNV~LO~ ~C~'~ BUILDING
See Pages
TO C:L~M PASS PARK - $30.60 RECORDING leEKS AND $496.24
FtL~__-_q PAID FROM F0-~D 306
See Pages / ff' 9'" 1 ?a,
T~O~L~A~$ BNTI~EN COLLIER COUNTY AND NAPLES COIqNUN~
X~C. ~ CONTiNUeD UTILIZ&?ION OF THE THUNDNRB~RD MOTEL,
AID IOA!ID OFFICE SPACE LOCAT'KD AT NORTH NAPLKS HEALTH CKNTXR
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FOR oor, Dn ~TH ~'m~x~cY sz~rzCEs
NODZFZCATZON OF SCOP~ OF#ORE Jt~D ~"~l~ION OF
~"'O9--21-10-001 (WkRll/NG ~ C'O~BqtTJI/CATI01~ G'IUL~F
COLLieR COUNTY ~D STATE OF FLORZDA D~P~II~NT OF
See Page. /~/. /~
Yteu
", --- __TIO~ FOR l:JfCl~ea~K OF ~133r972 b~JND 472
::. ,Ztem
Page 31
September 3, 1991
I~',B]:D ~O, 91-1754 I'N ~ AI!OUNT OF $21,715.32 ~ ~ ~
~~,~'~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~M~L, ~ "L", ~CO B~,
FOR ACQUISITION OF EASemENT NITHIM PARCEL 535 ~R
P~ ~ - $~0,~0 ~~ C~ PAID ~ ~
837.50 ~0~I~ CO~ P~ZD ~ ~
':~':~'~CAT~O~ D~R~CT ADVI$OR~ COHMITTEE - TERM KXPIR~S 9/23/95
See Page.
'.!C~]~&FZ~AT~ OF COlleCTiON TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PReSeNTeD B~ TH~
1989 TAX ROLL
No. Date
270 8/22/91
FO~ I!IMAT~ ~10~. 51444 A!ID 54435
0OI~RK~POND~NC~ - FILED AND/OR REFERRED
The following miscellaneous correspondence was f/led and/or
to the various departments ae indicated below:
1. Letter to Chairman Goodnight dated 8/21/91 from Robert G.
Nave, Director, Division of Resource Planning and Management,
DCA, re agreeing to refrain from further action until
10/23/91 to allow the county to adopt a groundwater protec-
tion ordinance. Copies to Nell Dotrill, BCC and filed.
Letter to Hon. Max. A. Hasse, Jr. dated 8/23/91 from Gordon
L. Guthrie, Director, DCA, re procedures necessary for County
to receive funds to update its Hazardous Materials Emergency
Plan. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Bob Fahey, BCC and filed.
Letter to Chairman Goodnight dated 8/12/9! from Martin K.
Seeling, Transportation Coordinator, Wetland Resource
Regulation, DER, re Palm River Wetland Preserve, Collier
County M/t/gat/on for L/vtngston Road Extension. Copies to
Nell Dorrtll, George Arch/bald, Bill Lorenz, Chairman
Goodnight and filed.
Memo dated 8/15/91 to Interested Parties from A1 B/shop,
P.~., Administrator, Point Source Evaluation Section, DER, re
Public Workshop, General Permit for Fish Farms Rule
17-660.820, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Copies to
Netl Dorr/ll, Mike Arnold end filed.
Page 32
11.
? 13.
September 3, 1991
Letter to Chairman of Board of County Commissioners dated
8/16/91 from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist,
Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation, re Collier County
- WRR, File No. 112010085. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harold
Huber and flied.
Rulemaking notice dated 8/16/91 received from Florida Dept.
of Environmental Regulation. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Bill
Lorenz, Mike Arnold, Frank Brutt and filed.
Letter to Chairman of Board of County Commissioners dated
8/21/91 from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist,
Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation, re Collier County
- WRR, File No. 112012135. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harold
Huber, Frank Brutt and filed.
Letter to Chairman of Board of County Commissioners dated
8/21/91 from Son M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist,
Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation, re Collier County
- WRR, File No. 112011755. Copies to Nell Dorrill, Harold
Euber, Frank Brutt and filed.
Certified letter to Humteton and Moore Engineers dated
8/14/91 from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal
Engineering and Regulation, DNR, re Notice to Proceed
Withheld, Permit Number: CO-310; Permittee Name: Stephen
and Caryl Thompson. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harold Huber and
filed.
Letter to Todd Herbst, Vice President, Cool Concessions, Inc.
dated 8/13/1991 from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of
Coastal Engineering and Regulation, DNR, re Notice to
Proceed, Permit Number: C0--329; Permittee Name Collier
County Board of County Commissioners. Coplee to Nell
Dotrill, Harold Huber and filed.
Letter to Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. dated 8/15/91
from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering
and Regulation, DNR, re Notice to Proceed Withheld, Permit
Number: C0-320; Permittee Name: Donald B. and Joanne M.
Stoughton. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harold Huber and filed.
Permit Number 02834 CO dated 8/1/91 from Florida Depart. of
Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores, Bureau of
Coastal Engineering and Regulation, for construction of a 4'
X 18' concrete wood deck support on an existing bridge
located at 600-800 S K30, addressed to Humiston & Moore
Engineers. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Harold Huber and flied.
Permit Number 02833 CO dated 7/30/91 from Florida Dept. of
Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores, Bureau of
Coastal Engineering and Regulation, for placement of three
bag (1 cubic foot sandbag) high structure around two turtle
nests for protection from beach erosion, addressed to Tom
Kraus, 714 7th Ave. North, Naples, FL. Copies to Nell
Dorrtll, Harold Huber and flied.
Letter to Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. dated 8/20/91
from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering
and Regulation, DNR, re Notice to Proceed Withheld, Permit
Number: CO-317; Permittee Name: Glenn M. and Ronda J.
Caudtll. Copies to Nell Dorrtll, Harold Huber, Frank Brutt
and filed.
Letter to Hon. Sam Coldtng, Collier County Property
Appraiser, dated 8/15/91 from Darrell W. Smith,
Administrator, Planning and Budgeting, State of Florida,
16.
17.
September 3, 1991
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Dept. of Revenue, re necessary changes to 1991-92 budget
request. Copies to Board of County Commissioners, Nell
Dotrill, John Yonkoek¥, Mike McNees and filed.
Dept. of Transportation - The Highway Beauttftcatlon Council
Mews, August 1991, Volume 12. Copies to Nell Dotrill,
George Archibald and filed.
Memo to Chairmen, Boards of County Commissioners (Selected
Counties), from Alma Gonzalez-Neimeiser, Legislative
Director, Florida Association of Counties, dated 8/21/91 re
Payments-In-Lieu-Of-Taxes Program. Copies to Nell Dotrill,
Board of County Commissioners, John Yonkosky, Mike McNees
and filed.
Notice of Committee Meeting - House of Representatives to
Community Affairs - Full Committee dated 8/23/91 re meeting
of 9/11/91 at 8:30 A.M., Room 214 - Capitol. Copies to Netl
Dotrill, Board of County Commissioners, Stan Litsinger, Mike
Arnold and filed.
Letter to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/22/91 from
Tom Thomas, Staff Attorney, Florida House of Representatives,
re The Small Cities Community Development Block Grant
Advisory Council scheduled for repeal pursuant to the Sundown
Act on 10/1/1992. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Russell Shreeve,
Board of County Commissioners, Frank Brutt and filed.
Notice of nonpayment dated August 16, 1991, for Job #2641
from Gary A. Plas, Credit Manager, A3ax Paving Industries,
Inc. for asphalt, material, labor, equipment and trucking
furnished pursuant to a contract with N. Cole Construction,
Inc. for Collier Village-Infrastructure, Immokalee, Bid
#90-1560/Bond #QO0077. Copies to Nell Dorrtll, Steve
Camell, John ¥onkosky and filed.
Notice addressed to Board of County Commissioners dated
8/14/91 from M. C. Birch, M. C. Birch & Associates, Inc.,
Agent for Florida Contractor Rental/Sale, advising they have
provided equipment rental under an order given by S & B Site
Development of Ft. Myers for the Football/Soccer Field in
Immokalee. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Camel1, John
Yonkosky and filed.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/14/91 from A.
M. Oddis, Southeastern Municipal Supply, a Division of
Clayton Group, Inc., advising that they have furnished water,
sewer, drainage pipes and othe:. related materials under an
order given by Florida State Underground for the Pine Ridge
Road water main. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Carne/l, John
Yonkosky and flied.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/16/91 from
Robert Cabana, President, Cabana Construction Company, Inc.,
advising that they have furnished jack and bore appx 529 L.F.
of 30" .468 wall steel casing, dewatering, traffic control
and excavations, labor, material & equipment under an order
given by Florida State Underground for the Pine Ridge Road
water facility Improvements. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve
Camell, John Yonkosky and filed.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/19/91 from
Commercial Contracting Systems, Inc. advising that they have
furnished labor and material for the Installation of metal
framing, drywall and stucco as per subcontract agreement with
Armon, Inc. dated 4/9/9! for the Collier County Agricultural
Center at Immokalee. Copies to Neil Dorrill, Steve Carnell,
John Yonkosky and filed.
September 3, 1991
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/16/91 from
Robert L. Johnston, Agent for Mace Sod Service, Inc. advising
that they furnished approx. 300,000 sq. ft. of Bermuda Sod
(419) under an order given by Greenmaker of SW FLA Inc. for
the Golden Gate Middle School Greenmaker of SW Fla. Copies
to Nell Dorrtll, Steve Carne/l, John Yonkosky and filed.
26.
27.
NotAce to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/14/91 from R.
Waterfield, Agent for Westshore Glass Corp. of Tampa,
advising that they furnished glass and/or storefront
materials under an order given by Florida Glass & Aluminum
1493 for the Collier County Library HQ/Additton. Copies to
Nell Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John Yonkosky and filed.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/22/91 from
Robert L. Johnston, Agent for Florida Contr. Rental a Sales,
advising that they furnished equipment rental under an order
given by Mid Continent Electric, Inc. for the 951-CR road
pro~ect. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky and filed.
28.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/20/91 from
Robert L. Johnson, Agent for CES Industries, Inc. d/b/a
Cons/. Electric Supp, advising that they furnished miscella-
neous electrical supplies and equipment under an order given
by Collier Board of County Commissioners for Emergency
Services at 4741 Golden Gate Pky. Copies to Neil Dorrtll,
Steve Camell, 3ohn Yonkosky and filed.
29.
· 30.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/22/91 from
William D. Meeker Jr./NACM Services Corp., Agent for Hydro
Conduit Corporation, advising that they furnished concrete
drainage pipe under an order given by Cardinal Contractors,
Sarasota for "Carica Road water storage tank and repump faci-
lities." Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky and filed.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 6/22/9! from
Robert L. Johnston, Agent for Florida Contr. Rental & Sales,
advising that they furnished equipment rental for the Collier
County-Pine Ridge Project under an order given by Florida
State Underground. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Steve Camell,
John Yonkosky and filed.
31.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/21/91 from
Nacm of Florida, Inc., agent for Commercial Improvements,
Inc., advising that they furnished fabricated and loose
materials for piping systems for the Community Center for the
City of Immokalee under an order given by Suppression
Technologies of Ft. Myers. Copies to Neil Dorrill, Steve
Camell, John Yonkosky and filed.
32.
33.
Notice to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/21/91 from A.
M. Oddis, Southeastern Municipal Supply, advising that they
furnished water, sewer, drainage pipes and other related
materials under an order given by Douglas N. Higgins, Inc.
for the "Riviera Golf Estates". Copies to Neil Dorrill,
Steve Camell, John Yonkosky and filed.
Before the Florida Public Service Commission in re:
Application for a rate increase tn Collier County by Naples
Sewer Company d/b/a Naples Industrial Park, Ltd., Docket No.
900757-SU, Order No. 24922, filed 8/16/91, Order Dismissing
Application for Increased Rates and Requiring Refund of
Interim Revenues. Copies to Nell Dorrtll, Mike Arnold, Ken
Cuyler and filed.
Page 35
September 3, 1991
34. Letter from Rose Laquidara, Pres. - Swiftline Trucking, Inc.,
dated 8/19/91 addressed to American Bonding Co, c/o Sedgwick
James, advising that they are hauling material under an order
given by Florida State Underground for the Goodlette & Pine
Ridge Water Improvement Job. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve
Camell, John ~onkosky and filed.
35. Copy of Voluntary~D~ismissal Without Prejudice rendered in
Civil Action No. 88-2173, Twentieth Judicial Circuit, styled
Tactmark, Ltd., a foreign corporation, and Philip O'Connor,
Pla~ntiffs, rs. Terence L. F~tagerald, Trustee, et al.,
Defendants. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Ken Cuyler and filed.
"BUD~~ IN THE AMOUNT OF $68,434 RECOGNIZING FISCAL YEAR ~90 CMI]tTPORttMm flOR TR~ L&# ENFORC~ TRUST FUND (608)
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
!i.:'meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - T~me: 3:20 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
" SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
/ CONTROL
IlLES,, ¢~K
minutes approved by the Board on
;~:/ or as corrected
Page 36