BCC Minutes 10/15/1991 R Naples, Florida, October 15, lg9!
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commiss]oners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
hmve besn created according to law and having conducted bus~ness
herein, met on this date at '9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
"~" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: 3ames C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
D~rector; Wanda Arrlght and Debby Farris, Deputy Clerk:s; Neil Dotrill,
County Manager; 3ennlfer Pike, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken
C~yler, County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; [.add Ryziw, Transportation Project Management; Frank
Brutt, Community Development Services Admin~strator; Bob Fahey, Solld
Waste Director; Bryan Milk, Planner; Sue Ftlson, Administrative
Asslstant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sher~ff's Offlce.
Page !
October 15, 1991
0omtteeloner Ramme movadl, seconded by Commissioner Shanahen and
that the agenda be approved with the following
chan~ee .'
Item #5B2 - Recognizing Brian L. Shtmer for his outstanding
and exemplary efforts in representing the Collier County com-
munity - Continued to 10/22/91. (Requested by Board of
County Commissioners.)
Item #?A - Robert May regarding District Eight Health
Council, Inc., funding - Continued to 10/29/91. (Requested
by Staff.)
Item #12B! - An ordinance amending Ordinance 82-2 regarding
property located we:at of Vanderbilt Drive and on the north
side of the Cocohat,:hee River - Continued to 10/22/91.
(Requested by Petitioner.)
Item #5B3 - Presentation by Tax Collector of holdback check -
Added.
Item #16G2 - To appl:ove the budget for the Landfill
Reclamation Technology Transfer Seminars for Fiscal Year 1992
- Moved to #8G1. (Requested by the public.)
Item #14A - Discussion of the law suit regarding the April
Circle project and the Taxpayers' Action Group - Added.
(Requested by Commll~stoner Saunders.)
Item #3B
~0M$~[T AQ,ENDA - APPROVED ~)/OR ADOPTED
The Botlon for approval ¢,f the Consent Agenda is noted under Item
Item
P~.~MATION DESIGNATING THE WEIX OF OCTOBIR 19-27, 1991, AS NATIONAL
Upon reading and presenting the proclamation to students from Pine
Ridge Middle School, Comtesloner 8han~han ~oved, seconded by
Commieeionmr Volpe and carried unanimously, that the Proclamation
~i~nating the week of October 19-27, 1991, as National Red Ribbon
Mmmkbm mdoptad.
::3
08'
Page 2
October 15, 1991
Plt~SEIg~&TIOH TO THE BOARD 0]' COUNTY CO~4ISSIONERS BY THE TAX COLLECTOR
OF HOLDSAgE CH~GK - IN THE J~OUNT OF $1.8 MILLION
Guy Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, presented a check to
the Board in the amount of $1.8 million.
~DG~'TAN~XZ:IiENT~ 91-417/420; 91-422/428~ 91-430 ~,TD 91-432/~33 -
~Ltssionsr Hume moved, seconded by CommAsstoner Sh~nahan and
¢~A~lln~ni~ly, to adopt Budget A~end~enta 91.-417/&20;
9~-422/428; 91-430 and 91-432/433.
Itlm99&1
C~l~17~AL P~I~gIT 91-4 RH PETITION C-91-4, REVER~D JOSEPH A. SPINELLI,
PASTOR OF ~T. ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC C]~URCH, R~QUESTING A P~I~MIT TO
CON~KICT THEIR AIgNUAL F~STIVA~ FROM NOVEMBER 6 THROUGH NOVEMBER 10,
~991, ON ~ gI~IRCH GROUNDS, 532§ 28TH AVENUE S.W., GOLDEN GATE -
~PFRO~D
Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, pre-
sented Petition C-91-4, a request from Reverend Joseph A. Spine/l/,
:~i Pastor o~ St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church, for a permit to conduct
'i their Annual Festival from November 6 through November 10, 1991. He
sm~d all requirements have b,~en met for carnival perml~ procedures,
..~ w~th no exceptions being ask~d and Staff ~s recommending approval of
th~s
f'.., ~lllo~r Hues ~ved, seconded ~ Coatestoner S~~ ~d
c~J~ ~l~ly, to apprc~e Carnival Psrmlt 91-4 reg~dtng
~titi~ C-91-4.
Page 3
October 15, 1991
ROAD PROJ~,,,OT WITHIS ru~ 313 - APPROVE~
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained this
item is a request to establish line items for project budgeting put-
poses and to identify expenditure items that are subject to retmbur-
sement in Fund 313, the Secondary Road Fund. He said the proposed
i. amendment will affect the Livingston Road project, however, is merely
::3 an accounting procedure and does not represent any new expenditures or
· -action regarding that project.
In response to Commtssio:aer Volpe, Mr. Archibald stated the
requested action will better enable the Finance Department to identify
some of the costs associated with the Livingston Road project, in par-
ttcular design and appraisal costs, when reimbursement funds become
available.
¢~leeloner Volpe ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahah and
carrledunani~ousl¥, to approve the Budget A~end~ent establishing
~ddition~l expenditure codes and transferring funds within the North
Naples Municipal Service Tax:[ng Unit Road Project within Fund 313.
Items #8B3
E~ITION OF A Sl]BORDINATION OF UTILITY INTERESTS AGRKEMENT BKTWEEN
FLORIDA PO~KR AND LI(IHT COMPJCNY AND COLLIER COUNTY R~LATIVX TO THAT
CERTAIN ~MENT HHLD BY THE UTILITY KNCUMBERIN~ THK FEE INTEREST HELD
B~ COLLIER COUNTY MHICH FORM!; A PORTION OF TH~ NORTH NAPLES ROAD~AY
ILIVINGSTON ROAD) CORRIDOR - APPROVED
Mr. Archibald presented a standard utility subordination agreement
between Collier County and Florida Power and Light Company (FPL),
involving the Livingston Roadi pro]ect. He explained there may be a
conflict on portions of that project between the proposed road
~i construction and some existing utility lines. He said this agreement
involves one single parcel located approximately 1,600 feet east of
Old U.S. 41. He mentioned FPL is willing to enter Into the subor-
dination agreement, putting their utility use second to the County's
right-of-way, with one condition. He advised if any of FPL's utility
must be relocated as a result of road construction, they request relm-
.-- October 15, 1991
:[bursement for associated co:3ts. He commented Staff does not foresee
uzlder the two-lane scenario, that any utility poles will need to be
· relocated, however, under tile four-lane condition it may be necessary.
He reported any costs incur]~ed by FPL will be subsidized by either the
project through the M.S.T.D. or a developer through direct reimbur-
$emsnt or impact fees, resulting in no expenditures on the part of the
County.
Frances Barsh with the Taxpayers Action Group (TAG), inquired why
FPL uses County right-of-way free of charge, yet charges the County
for relocation expenses?
Mr. Archibald responded that utility companies are allowed to ask
the County for a permissive use to locate their lines within the
rights-of-way the County has acquired with associated costs for per-
mirting purposes only. He i:ndtcated the County does have the ability
to charge for that kind of al)proval, but currently and historically,
cities and counties prefer that the land remain unencumbered leaving
the County able to simply pu~: the utility company on notice when
relocatton becomes necessary.. He added in this case, the utility com-
pal~y spent money years ago f]'om the previous land owners for the right
to locate their lines and although the County has now acquired the fee
;lmple right of the land, it remains encumbered by those previous
· Commissioner Volpe questioned if costs associated with the
~elocation of utilities are anticipated and included when construction
new road is contracted out, to which Mr. Archibald replied in the
[ve 0
CoB~d~Aoner Volpe loved, seconded by Co~aiseloner Shanaban and
unanlammly, to approve the execution of a !lubordtnstion of
Interests A~ree~nt betweon Florida Power ~d Light Company
~ ¢ollimr CountIf relative to that certain easement: held by the uti-
1tt~F encus~merlng the fee tnte:~est held by Collier County which for~ a
portion of the North Naples Roadwm¥ (Livingston Road) Corridor.
Page
October 15, 199!
~/' RESOLUTe01 01-722 RE PKT~T~! P~-91-6, )(ARIC LA)4O~
F~ ~~ ~A, L~. P.~., ~q~STINO A ~OV~SlO~ USK WbW OF
~ON 8.10 (ESS~I~ S~CKS) OF ~ A-2 ZONING DIS~ICT TO ~LOM
A C~~T~ON T~ ~R ~OPKR~ LOCATKD ~ST OF U.S. 42
~L), ~OX~LY 350 ~]~T ~ST OF T~ I~KRSECTION OF ~FOOT
MZ~I~ ROE ~ ~IOK S2]~T IH SECTION 4, TO. SHIP 51 SOUTH,
2~ E~T, COLLI~ CO~, ~ORIDA, CONSISTING OF 2.39 AC~S - APFRO~D
~CT TO ~I~ ~IO~ OF 185 ~T
Planner Milk presented P~:tttion PU-91-6, a proposal to obtain
Provisional Use "b" of Section 8.10, Essential Services, of the
Zoning District to allow a l[15-foot communication tower. He noted
land to the north Is zoned PUD, Victoria Falls, Is undeveloped but
approved for 157 multi-family dwelling units; and land to the east,
west and south is zoned A-2, semi-developed and subdivided primarily
Into 2.5 and five acre tracts:. He commented on the sequence of events
which occurred during the pr¢,cesstng of this petition. He stated on
September 9, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
91-84, the Communication Tower Ordinance; on September 19th, the CCPC
unanimously denied this petition; and on October 1st, the Board made
interpretative adjustments to the Communication Tower Ordinance by
specifying that communication towers located in all agricultural
zonings may be allowed as a Provisional Use on a site of less than 20
acres, but the site cannot be accessory or related to any other
Provisional Use. He added the applicant has amended the petition to
reduce the tower height to 185 fe(:t, which makes this petition con-
sistent with the Communlcatio:a Tower Ordinance He noted both the
interpretative adjustments and amE:ndment occurred subsequent to the
decision of the CCPC to deny 'this petition. He informed that no
member of the public has spok(~n tn opposition to the proposal and a
letter of no objection has be~n received from the property owners of
Victoria Falls PUD. He concluded Staff is recommending approval of
Petition PU-91-6 based on a ll~tter received from Young, Van Assenderp,
Varnadoe & Benton, P.A., addr(~sstng the Petitioner's agreement to
limit the tower to a maximum height of 185 feet.
In response to Commtsstoni~r Volpe, Planner Milk said Staff's oft-
Page 6
October 15, 1991
position against this petition was based solely on the proposed
height of 280 feet and its Inconsistency with the ordinance.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that adjacent developers in favor of
this type of proposal be required to include notification tn their
contracts of sale that there will be a Provisional Use for acom-
muntcatton tower In the area. He explained a major issue with regard
tO this subject has been members of the public purchasing property
unaware of the Impending cometruction of a nearby communication tower.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Planner Milk explained that
towers with heights of 185 fl:et or less are not required to meet the
1,000 foot buffer requirement, have a shared use plan or search out
' · other potential towers for shared use within the six-mile radius.
~,~'. ·
,,a~. Attorney Bruce Anderson, repre, s_,enttng the petitioner urged the
Board to approve Petition PU-91-6 Ich he stated has been amended to
fully comply with the new Co~unt, Ions Tower Ordinance.
Cos~/ssione~' Shanah~n ~oved, seconded by Co---tsstoner li~sse ~ad
-~', c~t'~'ied ~l~usly, to approve Petition PU-91-6, thereby adopting
91-722.
Page 7
October 15, ~9gl
C01~J~CT SERVICES BY WILSON, MILLER, BARTON AND PEEK, INC., ACCEPTED
leOIt Sl~-~NI~G I~PR~S TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD BETN~EN RADIO ROAD
AND GOLDEN (lATE PARKWAY, INCLUDING APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
NO. · TO EFFECTUATE A FINAL PAYMENT FOR CIE PROJECT NO. 002
Ladd Ryztw with Transportation Services, presented a close-out of
the engineering contract for the stx-lantng of Airport-Pulling Road.
He said the engineering services consisted of a Joint utility design
with the Olty of Naples as w,e11 as landscape design. He summarized
the various costs of the project including change orders relating to
additional landscape and utility design services.
Mr. Ryziw concurred with Commissioner Volpe that the overall pro-
Ject came in 30~ under budget.
Mr. Ryziw continued, stating a ma~or portion of the 13.9~ increase
over the original contract a~tount represents landscape design and
improvements that were not part of the original contract. He said the
other portion of the increase relates to design services on behalf of
the City of Naples. He expla~lned the decision to combine the two pro-
Jects results in saving construction dollars for both the City and
County by not having to adJus. t utility systems or reconstruct inter-
sections. He advised the final outstanding payment due the consultant
is $40,415.g8, of which the City of Naples has an obligation of
$22,04~.5~. He said the net pay-out by Collier County is $18,373.47.
Oolld. alio~e~ Sh~n~h~n ~oved, lecondsd by Co~imslonsr H&sse and
caFF~ed ~i~t~ly, to approve the final ~d actual del~ fees with
N~, Miller, ~rton a Peek, Inc., in the ~o~t of 8317,056.52;
IcC~t all ~lcll ~rfo~d ~ Con~lt~t ~d C~lr~ authorized to
mte ~le~tal A~nt No. 4 u~n revlm ud approval ~ the
O~W l~o~; ~t direct the Flmce Director to tens a ttmly
f~l ~t to Comltut In the ~t of $40,416.98.
Page 8
October 1§, 1991
~TION~ TO AUthORIZE EXPANDED SERVICES BY WILSON,
A~D P~EE, INC., FOR VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD ~TKNSION
AND C.R. 31, INCLUDING APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL
FOR CIK PRO:~CT NO. 023 - APPROVED WIT~ CONDITIONS
Mr. Ryziw explained this. is a status report on the preliminary
engineering and environmental services undertaken by Wilson, Miller,
Barton & Peek, Inc., relating to the project to extend Vanderbilt
Beach Road west of Airport Pulling Road, to intersect with the Junc-
tmon of U.S. 41. He remarked this is a multi-phase project and due to
environmental sensitivity, Staff is being cautious not to commit to a
complete comprehensive engineering contract. He said to be cost
effectAve, the project is being approached from an incremental stand-
point. He reported Staff is asking for approval to proceed with an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project, which will then
c~lminata in the environmental approval of an alignment of Vanderbilt
B. mach Road. He said Staff will subsequently ask the Board for appro-
vml of an engineering contract for final design. He indicated the
amount of approval above the original contract amount is $61,798.99,
of which $18,500 ~s allocated to continue immed~ate services related
to enviro]l~ental and water management issues on the project. He said
more importantly, Staff is asking the Board to approve a total project
appropriation of $183,923.99 for preliminary engineering and environ-
mental assessment.
Commissioner Volpe inquired if the EIS will be prepared by
Transportation and Environmen'tal Services Staff or a consultant?
Mr. Ryziw recommended the work be done by the consultant. He
s~g~ested an environmental project team be formed to look at the
environmental impacts of the proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road as a
separate pro~ect. He indicat~d Staff will be able to provide support
-- services on the environmental aspects, however, the necessary exper-
rise wll! be provided by the consultant.
Commissioner Saunders commented the Board is attempting to reduce
the use of consultants wherever possible. He agreed that with this
Page 9
October 15, 1991
',!{:..'t~ Of project, outside ex~,ertise Is necessary to develop the ElS,
however, all opportunities should be explored to utilize the County's
Environmental Staff to reduce the associated costs.
Commissioner Volpe stated the County Manager has indicated Staff
has the expertise to conduct an EIS, however, does not have the time.
County Manager Dotrill communicated this project can be added to
the work program of the Environmental Staff, but cautioned it will be
at the expense of another important project, i.e., the upland habitat
protected species issues, th.~ eagle ordinance, the ground water pro-
tection ordinance or the coa~tal zone barrier island elements.
James Wallace, Vice President of Walbro, Inc., supported Staff's
recommendations. He said the) Vanderbilt Beach Road project is the
most critical issue in the entire North Naples area and, in his opi-
nion, has not been given enough priority.
Gilbert Erlichman, member' of the Taxpayer Action Group (TAG),
suggested that It should not be necessary to hire an environmental
consultant, because the County has the necessary personnel on Staff.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald countered that on
this type of project, surveyors are needed to work in conjunction with
environmentalists, Jurisdictional lines must be created and Iden-
tified, biologists are needed, etc. He said many professionals need
to be involved in this project anti the County does not have all the
necessary personnel on Staff. As a result, he said, the coordination
ix more effectively accompltslhed by a consultant who does employ the
necessary personnel, and the only qualified firm in this area is
Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc:.
i'~'I' Fred Tarrant with TAG, su~]gested that the road projects in the
may be of a much higher: priority than other environmental pro-
s. ]{e encouraged the Country to investigate utilizing the exper-
tise and knowledge of State p~rsonnel regarding environmental projects
rather than hire consultants for that purpose.
Co~a~seloner Volpe ~ov~d, seco~ed ~ Co~isstoner Sanders ~d
Page 10
October 15, 1991
~'r]~d ~]~m~ly, to a~;~ the f~ ~ncrem of ~61,798.99 w~h
53'
Page
October 15, 1991
Commissioner Shanahan mentioned that tremendous interest has been
~ieplayed regarding redistricting and suggested the Board discuss its
~sition and invite the Schc,ol Board to provide input before the final
decis$on is made by both bodies.
Co~isstoner Volpe indicated from the amount of public input he
has heard, he would like to see the School Board and Board of County
Co~iss~oners' district lines closely aligned.
Co~ssioner Hasse agreed that wou~d be beneficial, no~ only to
the citizens but to the Supervisor of Elections Office, however, a
problem exists w~th three members of the School Board residing in one
~eo~raph~ca~ area.
In response to Commisslo~er Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler
~nd~cated the Board of Counk~ Commissioners does not set the School
Board district linee.
Co~issioner Goodnight r,~ported the NAACP is very interested in
having Naples Manor become part of District 5. She disagreed with
tha~ su~gestion, stating tha'~ areas within each district should be
conti~ous. She a~so mentio~ed that the School Board 1Shes are drawn
so as to have one member repinesent each of the five high schools in
the Co~ty. She said while the boundary lines of the School Board and
the Board of County Co~sstoners should be as c~osely aligned as
that should not be accomplished to the detriment of students
n the County.
Nelson Faerber, member of the Collier County Schoo~ Board, empha-
~zed that the School Board has developed three proposals which have
submitted at four outresch meetings. He said audiences at each
of the meetings were very receptive with some minor considerations.
He referred to Option 3 which is very similar to the Board of County
Co~$esionere plan, however, Is not a mSrror image. He stated the
Board of Co~ty Commiss~oners should not expect from the Schoo~ Board
that red$skrickin~ will result $n mirror districts. He mentioned the
October 15, 1991
School Board is willing to have its staff meet with the County's Staff
:;'. ; pr~or to the fin&l meetings of both bodies to work out more details.
This being a discussion item, no action was required.
es ~*S~ 11~00 A.M. - Rec~nvened: 11:15 A.M. at which time Deputy
Clerk F~r~ replaced ~ty Clerk ~rt~hl ~
It~ ~B6
C~ ~ ~ ~0~, I]iC. FOR INCLUSION OF ~ILI~
George Archibald, Transportation Services Director, announced th~s
item involves a recommendation to add some utility work to the Radio
Road Construction Contract, %;hich has Just been approved and is pre-
sently underway. He reminded the Board of County Commissioners that
in August a 1.65 million doletar contract was approved to four-lane a
1.1 mile segment of Radio Road, beginning at approximately Santa
Barbara and extending to the west. He verified the project Is under-
way to the low bidder, Harpel' Brothers, Inc. He stated the bid
received from the contractor for Installation of the 12" water main
represented a substantial savings over the engineer's estimate
for the same amount of work. He concluded that the Board of County
Gommtsstoners must consider whether or not to add the water main
contract and, in so doing, must recognize that the alternative to
adding that amount of work to the current contract is to bid it out
separately. He proposed that, due to the big cost savings, the Board
of'County Commissioners might con~tder waiving its bid process as set
~orth in the Count¥'s purchasing policy. He relayed the dollar
involved for the contingent and inspection fees relating to
pro~ect as well as costs involved for testing of the lines. He
one conflict between the storm drain system and the water
the resolution of which is estimated at $4,000. He concluded
that staff is not only recomm~nding the $237,295, but adding the cost
of testing and the resolution of one additional conflict box for an
aggregate! total of $242,095. He confirmed the preparation by staff of
a Sup~le~lental Agreement which reflects the change orders on a unit
Page 13
October 15, 1991
price item &rid ta consistent with the proposal which is part of the
bid package. Re expla/ned that, addit/onally, there is a 10~ con-
t/ngency, or approximately $24,000, which staff ts requesting the
Board of County Commissioners delegate to the Utility Division rela-
tive to any other conflicts or rev/stons wh/ch might be considered for
~ndertaktng as part of the /nstallatton of the water main. He
reflected that the Transportat/on staff needs to charge the Utlltty
Dtv/sion for the inspection serv/ces for Installation of the line, the
cost of which is set/mated at $?,830.74, or approximately 3~ of the
work. He pointed out that tlAe add/t/on of a water main /s a change of
scope and /s &llowed for, ba:sed t~pon the Elortda Department of
Transportat/on speciftcation~ which are used, through a Supplemental
A~reement /n the amount of $242,095.00. He related that consideration
must also be given to wa/v/n!] the bid process, as set forth in the
Co~l%t¥~s Purchas/ng Policy, based upon staff~s recommendation and the
economic benef/ts of includlng the force main in this construction
pro~ect.
~n reply to Commissioner Volpe, Hr. Archibald confirmed that the
destgr~ phase for the rema/nd~r of the pro~ect has been completed and
staff is currently in the r/flht-of-wa¥ acquis&tton phase. He
expressed the hope that, whell time to put the package out for bidding
under Phase ~, the added wo~k needed by the Ut/llty Division may be
included in that second phas(~.
Assistant Utt]/ties Admi~tstrator Bloetscher interjected that the
line plans are complet~d for the next phase of Radio Road which
be bid.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, County Attorney Cuyler advised
that, under the Purchasing Policy, when it is found in the County~s
best interest to wa/ve the p~lrchas/ng policy, it can be done under
R~quest for Proposals. He r~lated that Mr. Archibald has made a good
argument that the Board of C¢,unty Commissioners might not have to
waive based on the manner in which the project was bid out to begin
wlth as well as the structure of the contracts. He reported that his
Page 14
October 15, 1991
office has advised Mr. Arch:lbald that it is better to have the Board
of County Commissioners con~tder the issue and actually waive the
~urchamtng policy.
Coimissioner Volpe expressed reservations about not using the com-
petitive bidding process.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Bloatschar estimated it
~fill take approximately 30 days .to bid the project and 60 days before
actual construction might commence.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald confirmed the
existence of a provision for completion of a segment within a certain
period of time and any delay will in turn delay that particular
contract commitment.
C~11~ml~r Shanahan ~d, seconded by Coutmsioner Hasam, to
lUtlM~II · ~l~ntml A~em~nt for the R~io Road four-l~tng
c~~l~ c~tract.
Commissioner Volpe stated he is inclined to vote for the Motion
' baeed upon a finding that there is an emergency which will Justify
waiving the competitive bidd:[ng as well as County purchasing prac-
tices.
Co~aimtoner Sh~nahmn ~nded his motion to Include the finding
bidd~ u ~11 u Co~ty ~c~stng practices, ~d Coutseloner Hume
~~ his ~o~ accordtn~J~y.
~ clll for the ~estton, the sotion carried ~t~ly.
NOTE: S~PL~NTAL AG~EMENT NOT ~CEIVED AS OF JUNE 19, 1992
Page 15
October 150 lg91
· T&TU~ ~ R~ ~ DOLL~ ISL&~D P~I~IT ~PPLICATION - ST~FF
S,BJ~P'L!J~ ~ APFR0, PRIAT"K PZ,AC~S~ A]FD RKPORT STATUS MONTHLY
Thomas E. Conrecode with the Office of Capital Projects
Management, summarized the e.vents which have transpired relative to
the ad~lintstrative hearing f:or the Sand Dollar Island Permit
Application. He explained that in pursuing the Administrative Hearing
the Cotmty will incur costs for expert witnesses and other related
costs estimated at $45,000, with the proposed funding source for same
being the Beach Front M.S.T.U. He relayed staff's recommendations to
discontinue efforts relatinG! to the Administrative Hearing and the
proposed dredging of Sand D¢,llar Island, and instead look at other
alternatives while continuing to monitor the progress of Sand Dollar
Island. He stated that the Board of County Commissioners were pro-
vided with a second attachment outside the agenda (copy not provided
for the record), and procee61ed to do a walk through of said document
page by page. He commented that page ! of said document depicts Sand
Dollar Island in 1989 and tflenttftes primary concerns regarding same
at the time of application for the Beach Renourtshment Permit. He
noted that page 2 of said dc,cument is a drawing of how Sand Dollar
Island more or less exists today, and then proceeded to identify pic-
tures contained on pages 3 fLnd 4.
The following persons sl,oke regarding this issue:
Harry Bussey
Robert Vance
SeraJ Odabas
Philip C. Addison
Arnold B. Palmer
Aurelio Abatangelo
Ray Lumpp
Frank Blanchard *
Charlotte Westman
*Stated he thinks he has, agreement to speak for a recommendation
from the Owners of the South Seas, Residents for Rational
Renourtshment, as well as the Hideaway Beach residents. He specifi-
cally requested that the Board of County Commissioners: Direct staff
to obtain another 90 day extension to the November 21st deadline for
~he DER hearing, direct staff to vigorously seek alternate actions
which will reduce or eliminuets the slit and algae problems, and have
the Natural Resources Division sample the water at the south end of
the waterway.
**liepresenting the Leagues of Women Voters
Concerns expressed tncl~tde the following: extremely happy with
the island but deeply concerned with the potential health hazard and
00[) PAC',[ 67 Page 16
October 15, 1991
mtench from the water; If this were a commercial establishment
~lttin~ this smell and health hazard there would have to be a remedy
imediarely; problems with the water; tests are not being made in the
proper locations; there Is a~ terrible smell and the situation Is not
healthy; the birds are comi£~9 onto the beach instead of being out at
Sand Dollar Island, thus adgltn9 to the problem; the air in the area is
so foul it hurts the eyes; there ts a silt and algae problem alon9 the
~ater's edge, betn9 the same problem noted in Stipulation 9 of the
~anuary 13, 1990 Permit; there continues to be a problem with the
water and wet soils; it is inappropriate to continue to take samples
of Gulf of Mexico water and say that it characterizes what the rest-
dents of Narco Island are complaining about; the whole subject of
dredgtn~ Is not appropriate; and objective consideration should be
given to alternatives.
In response to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Conrecode confirmed that
the point of testtn~ for the water was stipulated in the Permit, and
staff Is testin9 in the locatton prescribed by said Permit. He stated
that one year's worth of testin9 of the water in the area is tracked
and It has only been in the last two months that Sand Dollar Island
has been breached, allowin9 Gulf of Mexico water to come Into the
?lgertatl Beach area.
llotlo~de by Co~atsstoner Shanahah, seconded by Coatsetoner
~V~H~r~, tO: 1) ~ for at least another 90 day extension after the
Ioml~l~r 2let degline; 2) mmmk ~ctton t~t will eliminate the
~obl~; 1) ~ the ~1tng in the appropriate places; ~d
~t a ~thly re~rt on the ~tter.
In response to Inquiry regarding the Intent of Commissioner
Shanties motion, Co~tsstoner Saunders clarified that the motion
to direct staff to tnvesttDate alternatives and does not direct
Coastlmd Engineers to do any studies in the area, to ~htch
Co~lssioner Shanahah concurred.
~ c~11 for the ~stton, the ~tlon c~rted
ss ~~: ll:O~ P.N. To Go Into Iconoalc ~velop~nt ~orkshop
8~si~ - ~convened Into le~lar S~sston
APRIL C:£RCLI: LA~UIT
October 15, 1991
Commissioner Saunders e~pressed his belief that this type of
lawsuit is designed to quiet people. He implied that, should that be
true in the Immediate instan.:e, he feels the Board of County
Oommissioners should send a :strong message to the development com-
munity that such a lawsuit will not be well thought of by this Board.
He requested that the Board of County Commissioners direct the County
Attorney to monitor the lawsuit, without becoming involved in it, to
review the file and report back concerning the type of lawsuit, i.e.
whether it is, in fact, a l~suit aimed at keeping the public quiet.
Commissioner Volpe concurred with Commissioner Saunders'
suggestion, adding that he must ascribe to the Taxpayer's Action Group
and their comments in good faith and to the action that has been filed
in good faith on the part of the litigant until shown otherwise.
Robert Gephardt, Attorne'~ for Florida Affordable Housing, prof-
feted his credentials and assured Commissioner Saunders that he would
not put his name on a slap suit.
Commissioner Saunders reiterated that he has not seen the lawsuit,
does not know the facts of same, and that his comments are no reflec-
tion on Mr. Gephardt's integrity.
DX$~SI(~ OF OON~N~ATION PRO(~RAM OF COLLIER COUNTY - R~QUEST TO
~TAXN ~CE$ OF CONSULTANT DENIED
Assistant Utilities Administrator B/oetscher distributed a package
which included the actual scope of services included in the RFP as
well as information extracted from the South Florida Permit. He
briefly summarized the history of this Item, beginning with direction
from the Board of County Commiss~oners back in April of 1991 to soli-
cit RFP's. He explained that, although there were thirty-three propo-
~als picked up, the response from Brown & Caldwell was the only one
~ecetved. He pointed out that accomplishments to-date include the
adoption of low flow plumbing fixtures as part of the Plumbing Code
Page 18
October 15, 1991
update as well as low flow irrigation automatic sprinkler systems and
detectors, and xertcecape as part of the Land Development Regulations.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Biostether stated that none
Of the things mentioned readily identifies what kind of water savings
will be realized. He stated that fairly conservative estimates were
':'~ made on the rate study.
)~:.: Commissioner Volpe commented he is not in favo]~ of duplicating an
:;;i~ ieffort which has already been done, adding that do¢~s not mean he is
,':T',not in favor of water conservation.
,,, ; Gilbert Erlichman distributed a copy of an article appearing in the
Naples Daily News on October 13, 1991, and proceeded to read portions
! of same regarding the inverted rate structure. He concluded that, If
the County intends to conserve water to the degree that It will cause
:{:~.[ a'hardehtp In the amount of money collected by the Utilities
· Department, it Is in a "cat¢ih 22 situation". He referred to a letter
received from the Division of Administrative Services Human Resources
Department on July 1, 1991, received in response to his request for a
departmental breakdown of County employees. From the list, he
· concluded there are 146 employees. He suggested polling these
employees and taxpayers regarding ideas for conservation of water. He
related that recently South l{ater Management District employed Brown &
Caldwell to make a study on conservation, and questioned why Collier
County did not utilize that ~tudy in assessing its water conservation
,ds.
Thomas A. Stasko stated ~:hat his taxes have Increased at an
~larming rate. He concurred with Mr. Erlichman's suggestion to uti-
lize existing data and repor,:s.
~ssloner Volpe ~ovsd,. seconded by Co~tssioner S~ and
4/0 (Commissioner Sa~md~ra not present) to deny the hirln~
of · consultant to address the Conservation Pro~ru in Collier County.
l~em 9~01 (for~erly #16G2 on Consent)
BUDfi~T FOR LANDFILL RECLAMATION TECHNOLOGYTRANSFER SEMINARS ~ORFY
lgg2 - ~PP~D
Solid Waste Management Director Fahey explained this item deals
with the Ford grant funds of $~00,000 which were received by the
October 15, 1991
County at the beginning of last fiscal year but were not included in
last year's fiscal budget. He advised that one of the complicating
factors here is the time frame of the seminars.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Fahey confirmed that
$49,000 is the amount remaining from last year and, thus, currently
being requested for approval.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Fahey stated there are
bills presently coming in frc.m the first seminar that was presented.
He acknowledged that a registration fee is being charged and that
staff has asked the Ford Foundation how that revenue will be con-
sidered. He commented that the ~ntent is to replenish and maintain a
f~.nd to permit as many seminaars as possible.
In reply to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Fahey reflected that thirty
people attended the seminar occurring on September 26th.
Charlotte Westman, repre~enttng the League of Women Voters of
Collier County, stated she ~ not opposed to seminars as structured
under the award received.
In reply to Mrs. Westman, Mr. Fahey advised that a fee was
established to enable more monies to be put into the fund in order to
offset some of the expenses ~ssociated with the seminars and extend
the benefit of the grant funds to accommodate more people in the event
it should become necessary. He added, however, that should the fee
no~ generate sufficient revenues, all expenses will be paid out of the
grant fund.
In response to Mrs. West~an, Mr. Fahey conf~rmed that American
Aimlines has offered a 40% d~[scount to anyone attending these semi-
nars. He stated he is not a~are of any discount being offered on car
rentals by persons attending the seminars.
In answer to Mrs. Westman, County Manager Dotrill explained ~hat a
cost center is a budget.
Commissioner Volpe sugge~ted this ~s an instance where perhaps the
Solid Waste Department could work with the EDC (Economic Development
Council) utilizing their resources and networking to attract more
Page 20
~ndees to future seminars.
October 15, 1991
Co~Liee~oner Volpe ~oved, seconded by Co~eeloner Shan~han
4/0 (Co~iseloner Sa~ndere not preeent), to approve the budget
91-723 APPOINTINa RICHARD BRAUN AND ED%IARD FERRINaER TO
~10LDEN~ATE ESTATKS CXTIL~N~ ADVlSORY CONMITTEE - ADOPTKD
Administrative Assistant Filson advised that both Richard Braun
and Edward Ferringer have sel'ved only one term and are eligible for
another appointment to the Gc~lden Gate Estates Citizens Advisory
Committee, and that both haw: requested reappointment. She confirmed
'receipt of an additional resume from John Gunnion. She relayed
%'~staff's recommendation for rt~appointment of both Mr. Braun and Mr.
get.
,,% Commissioner Goodnight s'tated that John Cunnion is qualified and
would make an excellent addi't~on to the Golden Gate Estates Citizens
Advteor~ Committee.
:'~(" Jo~ C~nlon ~nferred that, although he would welcome an oppor-
~/'.~t~ty to be on the Golden Gate Estates Citizens Advisory Committee,
,he Is in a~reemen~ with the reappointment of Mr. Ferringer to repre-
.~en~ Phase I.
~~i~ H~e ~ed, ~econded ~ Co~t~sioner S~ ~
~~ 4/0 (C~ioeloner Sa~dero not present}, ~o a~r~e etaflee
r~~tlo~ for rea~int~ of Rtc~rd Bra~ ~d E~rd
!%rr~r to the ~olden ~tte [states Ctttz~n. A~i.o~ Conttt..,
~ttM ~solution 91-~23.
Page 21
October 15, 1991
~X t~e~ ~tlOB
Administrative Assistant Filson confirmed that, in lieu of a
i[:.::J'letter of resignation submitted by Margorie R. Ball, resumes have been
i.,!11i," recotved from Marc Gertnet and Elizabeth A. Rhymer to fill the vacancy
on the Library Advisory Board. She reported receipt of a Memorandum
frou the Library Director advising that the Library Advisory Board is
'recommending the appointment of Elizabeth A. Rhymer to fill the
remainder of ~he term, which wlll explre on December 31, 1992.
Co~Iutoner Goodnight m~ved, seconded by Co--ieetoner Shanahen
and c~rried 4/0 (Commissioner Saunders not present), to appoint
Iltr.&beth a. ~r to the Libra~ A~tso~ ~d, there~ adopting
z: .~...
Page 22
October 15, 1991
~ "'!~'~)~' Commissioner Volpe reported continued receipt of phone calls from
~i'.~ concerned residents regarding the water and sewer rates and the impact
upon the single family residential citizens.
In reply to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dorrtll stated that
~..; a 90 day period has been developed in which residents can consider and
,. evaluate going to a 3/4" meter at the nominal cost of 832.00. He
pointed out that persons wttlh large potable water irrigation systems
nay need a 1-1/4" meter. He reported that he has directed staff to
!!~,evaluate whether last month':J bills are appropriate as a result of the
rate increase. He confirmed that his recommendation and direction to
staff was that the bills should be adjusted due to the inequity.
In answer to Commissione:~ Hasse, County Manager Dotrill stated he
is advising people not to pat their bills until such time as a final
decision has been made and, ~:hose having already paid, will receive a
Ji'!/credit toward their account ~lnd/or the cost of replacing the meter.
In response to Commissioner Volpe questioning the availability of
alternative sites for a spring training facility, County Manager
Dorrtll confirmed a 15 minute meeting over a month ago with a gentle-
man who indicated he represented a developer, and presented a site plan
~-~ for an lllternative site. He related that the conversation included
problemt~ associated with scr~[b Jay habitat of the site. He stated he
had heard nothing further regarding same until this morning when he
was asked by reporters concez'ntng the status.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, County ~anag,er Dorrtll
stated he thinRs it incumbent on the ne~ development group to present
their proposals for consideration prior to the public hearing.
In reply to Commissioner Hasse, Commissioner Volpe confirmed
receipt of a telephone message regarding an invitation for the Board
of Co~ty Commissioners to attend a function at the Edgewater Beach
Hotel.
In response to Commissioner Volpe's inquiry regarding water within
Page 23
October 15, 1991
Bay, County Manager Dotrill reported he haft sent the City
Manager a letter notifying him of the Count¥'s tntlmt to switch over
on November 4th. He confirmed the County does have the capacity, the
pipeline is in place, and the only thing remaining to be done is
i]'closing the City's side of the valve. He explained there will be a
~flushing period. He reported an Executive Summary pertaining to this
matter will be included on next Tuesday's agenda.
· ': oss Commissioner Shanaban Bovsd, seconded by Coatesloner Hasse
~ c~rrted unanimously, that the foll~tng tte~ ~r the con-
(~.: ~t ~ ~ a~roved ~d/or adopted: see
The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and n¢, Certificate of Occupancy shall be Issued
until the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation fur-
nishes a letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system
into service and approving the water distribution system for
service.
2. Bacteriological tet~ttng has met the County's requirements.
The Fire Flow requ:[rements of the project have been
satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting
the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance.
4. Receipt of payment for water usage from Utilities for bac-
~ tertologlcal testing.
,:. /tel #16~2
"~' MATER FACILITIES ACCEPTED ~}R NAPLES GREEN - WITH STIPULATIONS
The water facilitt,es to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued
until the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation fur-
nishes a letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system
into service and approving the water distribution system for
service, and;
2e
Bacteriological testing has met the Count¥'s requirements,
and;
The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been
satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting
the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance. and;
4. Receipt of payment for water u6age from Utilities for
bactert_ologlc.al testing.
It'am ~16A3
'.'. '~T~ FACILITIES ACCEPTED 113R TOLLGATE 0FF-SITE DITCH - WITH
~;' ~T IFULATIOII~
00o 77
Page 24
October l§, 199!
The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued
until the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation fur-
niehes a letter approving the water distribution system for
service, and;
Bacteriological testing has met the County'e requirements,
and;
The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been
satisfied, and;
Receipt of payment for water usage from Utilities for bac-
teriological testil~g.
See Pages
:!i;RE~OLUTION 91-703 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF
ABkT~M~IT OF FUBLIC NUISANCI| ON LOT NO. 16, BLUE HERON LAKE PARK,
~D~0NDOANDENEDIN& SOSA
See Page s__~'-'~;:~--
"" It~OLUTIOI 91-704 ~OVIDING ~R USISS~ 0I LI~ ~R ~ COST 0F
~~ OF ~IC ~IS~C!~ ON ~~ 1ST ~D LOT 26, I~EE
? ~I~D ~~S~ INO.
SeePages
lt~ e1~4c
~~ON 91-705 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF
, J~tI'BIBIT OF PON, IC IBISJJICI: ON SUNSRI!I~ PAR[ MOBILE HO~ES LOT NO: 49,
~ ,c~Lzs c. ~ teaaLES V. COLE
i~OLUTION 91-706 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
A~AT~HNT OF FOBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 13, BLOCK 101, MARCO BEACH, UNIT
. ~.~!]~ CNARLES N. AND JOAN K. HICKS
See Pages
t~
~/~OLUTION 91-707 PROVIDINI :~OR ASSESS!~]IT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
OF FUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 31, BLOCK
tL~___ AND MICHELE M.
g1-~08 PROVIDING l~OR lSSlSSMENT OF LI~ ~R ~ COST OF
~LIC ~I~CE 0N I,OT 3S, BL~ U, CO~S V~ILT
See Pages /'~ ' /~ /
Page 25
October 15, 1991
91-709 PROVIDING FOR ASSKSSMEJFT OF LIKN FOR THE COST OF
OF FUBLIC NUISANC!~ ON LOT~ 1 THROU(ZH 4, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK
~I~T~ UNIT NUMBER 2~ HALS~ F. SH~R'~D~ AS TRUSTEE
/
See Pages ~ ~'
el~A4h
91-TlO ~OVIDIN~ ~R ~5~5~ OF LZ~ ~R ~ COST OF
OF ~LIC ~I5~!~ ON LOT 20, BLOC~
RK~OLUTION 91-711 PROVIDING FOR ~SS~SSM~!~f OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATB~IT O!~°FUBLIC HUISANC!: ON LOT 3:1, :32, AND :3:3, ROSKI~ItRY RIItZHTS,
s.e Pages t (.-i0 7
'11:~,OL~FTIO~ 9:1-712 PROVIDING FOR A~S%SI~q~I~T OF LI~ ~R ~ COST OF
[~.['[': I~L~ON 9~-713 ~OVZDZN~ ~R ASS2S~ OF LIXN ~R ~ COST OF
:'~ J~I~ 91-716 ~DING ]~R ~SKS~ OF LI~ ~R ~ COST OF
~~ ~ E~A~S, VILAS OF N~ES~ INC.
91-717 PROVIDII~] II~)R ASSZBSMZ3FT OF L/KN ~R ~ COST OF
~ ~IC ~ZS~ ON LOT 632, ~ZT 4 OF RIVI~ GOLF
79
Page 2 6
$e~ Pages
October 15, 1991
']~10~'I01 Jl-?lS FR~VIDIN~ FOR A~SES51"~]IT OF LI~ ~R ~ C~T OF
,: ~U~ 91-T19 ~ZDZNG ~R ~S[~ OF LZ~ ~R ~ COST OF
':' ~~ 0F ~ZC ~l~ O~ L~ 635, ~ZT 4 O~ RZ~ GOLF
~~ OF ~ZC ~l~ ON LOT 632, ~IT 4 OF RIVI~ GOLF
~:,~' "]TI~IT O~ l~]~IC IUIS~IC]| ON LOT 637, DI~T 4 OF RI~ ~LF
: . ]~A~I, ~ OF I~LES, INC.
~., ~ ~~ A ~QUI~ OF SDP ~89-133
I~ ~ ~ COerCE ~ ~ ~ ~L INSTR~5 ~I~ ~ST
BE ~ IN ~ ~LIC ~=CO~S OF COLLI~ CO~
?~i: '!f/ .13~CUT3COI OF &N FJI~M~Fr A~L~M~]IT FOR TH~ ACQUISITION OF ~N ~q~M~NT
~:; FC]R THI[ WIDI3FING OF RADIO ROAD
Item ~16B3
OF QUIT CLAIM DKEI)S FOR TMO (2) TWELVE FOOT (12t} DRAINAGE
ON THE P~T OF BERKSHIRE LAKES UNIT 5
SEE M;P~w ln, ]992!Public h~mring re AV-91-012
Item ~1~1
~,eoxm~m~ OF ~ c~E ~ ~=SZD~ ~ ~OUZS HO~eS~ ~ VZCE
THE RIVERCHA~ OWBXRS ASSOCIATION FOR UTILIZATION OF A
COLLIER COUI~ EASEMENT FOR LANDSCAPINQ AND OTHER
II 80
Page 27
October 15, 1991
'~i F~ICUTIOM OF !~TICI OF PROMISE TO PAY AIqD A~qr~(KNT TO KXTEHD PAYMX]FT
; Of ~ IMPACT FEES WITH RICHARD AND SANDRA DKSMOYKRS
~YTZOM OF MOTIC~ OF PRO~IS~ TO PAY &lqD &~ TO ~FERD PATI~NRT
IMPACT !.KES WITH RICHARD ~ SARDRA DESWOYKRS
~"'i']01~'17~0110~ ~OTICI OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGRKKM~3FT TO KXTEND PAYMI3FT
:[[: See Pages 1 ~,~ ~" /'~ ~
~. I~ ~16F1
~;.,~** Jt~'~:FT~ OF JLDV/S~:~NT OF ~M%RG~ICY I~DICJtL S~'ICSS GR&RT
OF iN IASlNIIT A~REDJEFf ~OR THE ACQUISITION 0! TWO
~ LYI!~ WITHIN PARCEL EL14-342 FOR THK PIBZ RIDGE INDUSTRIAL
PAREM~rlClPAL SI3r~CES TAXIN0 AMD BK]IKFIT UNIT (SPECIAL ASSESSM~J~T
com sFOm)sWcE - r LED i ,,/oa
",.',; The following miscellaneous correspondence was flied and/or
' ""') referred to the various departments as indicated below:
10.
12.
October 1§, 1991
Copy to Commissioner Goodnight of letter dated October 2,
1991, to Brenda Troesch, Specialist, Real Property Management
Department, from Attorney Angela M. Ab~11, re: Proposed
Interlocal Agreement and Lease Agreement between Immokalee
Fire Control District and Collier County. Copies to BCC, and
filed.
Copy to BCC of letter dated October 1, 1991, from Barbara
Pickens, Deputy Clerk, Collier County, re: unpaid taxes and
public auction on Lot 17, Block 791, Marco Beach Unit 25,
Enriqueta de Gutierrez. Copies to Neil Dotrill, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
Copy to BCC of letter dated October 2, 1991, to Stephen M.
Fain, Director of Pinance, Collier County Public Schools,
from John Yonkosky, Collier County Finance Director, re:
1990-91 Federal Payments-in-Lieu of Taxes (P.I.L.T.). Filed.
Letter dated September 27, 1991, to Commissioner Goodnight
from Robert G. Nave, Director, Division of Resource Planning
and Management, Department of Community Affairs, in response
to a letter from Collier County Audubon Society. Copies to
Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt, BCC, and filed.
Copy to Commissioner Goodnight of letter dated September 27,
1991, to Eileen Arsenault, President, Collier County Audubon
Society, from Robert G. Nave, Director, Division of Resource
Planning and Management, Department of Community Affairs,
responding to assertion that Collier County failed to adopt
certain land development regulations. Copies to BCC, Neil
Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Memorandum dated October 1, 1991, to All CDBG Recipients,
from Lewis O. Burnside, Jr., Director, Division of Housing
and Community Development, Department of Community Affairs,
requesting Acquisition/Relocation Report. Copies to Nell
Dotrill, Russell Shreeve, Frank Brutt, and filed.
From the Department of Environmental Regulation, Rulemaking
Notice appearing in the September 27, 1991, Florida
Administrative Weekly. Copies to Neil Dotrill, Frank Brutt,
Bill Lorenz, and filed.
Letter dated October 4, 1991, to Chairman, BCC, from Jon M.
Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of
Environmental Re~ulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No.
112030859. Copies to Neil Dorrill, Harry Huber, and filed.
Letter dated October 4, 1991, to Chairman, BCC, from Jon M.
Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of
Environmental Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No.
112030555. Copies to Nell Dorrill, Harry Huber, and filed.
Letter to Chairman, BCC, dated September 25, 1991, from Sybil
M. Dempsey, Surplus Property Supervisor, Department of
General Services, re: Eligibility Update. Copy to Skip
Camp, and filed.
Letter dated September 27, 1991, to Commissioner Goodnight
from Gail L. Lively, Director, Executive Secretariat, U.S.
Department of Housi:ag and Urban Development, re: United
Church Homes' Section 202 application. Copies to Neil
Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Russell Shreeve, and filed.
Letter dated Septem:Oer 27, 1991, to BCC from Tony D. McNeal,
Engineer, Bureau of Coaetal Engineering and Regulation,
Department of Natural Resources, re: request for Public
I 000'~,r. 82 Page 29
October 15, 199!
13.
14.
15.
Comment; File NumbE~r: CO-340; Applicant: Julius Fiske,
Trustee. Copies to Neil Dorrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz,
and filed.
From the Department: of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches
and Shores, Bureau of Coastal Engineering R.~gulation, copy of
approved Permit Number: 02847 CO, Application Date:
9/24/91. Copies to Nell Dorrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz,
and filed.
Copy to BCC of letter dated September 30, 1991, to Guy
Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, from Darrell W. Smith,
Administrator, Planning and Budgeting, Department of Revenue,
re: approved Fiscal Year 1991-92 Budget. Copies to Nell
Dotrill, John Yonkosky, and filed.
Opinion filed October 4, 1991, in the District Court of
Appeal of Florida, Second District, in Case No. 91-O2913,
O'Sheas Restaurant v. Board of County Commissioners:
Petition for writ of certiorari denied. Copies to Neil
Dorrill, BCC, and filed.
16.
Letter dated October 1, 1991, to Commissioner Goodnight from
Guy L. Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, re: payment of
commissions due the Tax Collector for 1990. Copies to Nei]
Dotrill, John Yonko:~ky, BCC, and filed.
17.
18.
Memorandum dated Oc':ober 2, 1991, to Sue Buck, Senior
Secretary, BCC, from Catherine M. Riehm, Assistant
Controller, enclosing reports from the Immoka]ee Water &
Sewer District requ:ired under Chapter 198, F.S. Filed.
Memorandum dated October 8, 1991, to Sue Buck, Sen/or
Secretary, BCC, froz~ Catherine M. Riehm, Assistant
Controller, enclosing reports from the Little Hickory -
Bonita Shores Fire Control District. Filed.
19.
20.
21.
Minutes received and: filed:
Pelican Bay MSIU/BU Advisory Committee Agenda for
October 2, 1991, and Minutes of September 11, 1991.
Marco Island Beachfront Renourishment Advisory Committee
Minutes of September 4, 1991.
C. Library Advisory Board Minutes of August 22, 1991.
Board of Supervlsor~ of Port of the Islands Community
Improvement District Minutes of August 15, 1991.
Notice to Owner date,! September 25, 1991, to BCC from Florida
Mining & Materials, under an order given by Tinchef Concrete
Const, for ready-mix concrete, block and related building
materials, for Collier County Library. Copies to Neil
Dotrill, Steve Carne:[1, John Yonkosky, and filed.
Notice to Owner date(! October 1, 1991, to BCC from Terraco
Stucco & Drywall, In(:., under an order given by Cornerstone
General Contractors, Inc., for all labor and materials to
stucco exterior and a~11 labor and materials to hang and
finish interior for the Community Center at East Naples
Community Park. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
22.
Notice to Owner dated October 1, 1991, to BCC from Terraco
Stucco & Drywall, Inc., under an order given by Cornerstone
General Contractors, Inc., for all labor and materials to
Page 30
23.
24.
October 15, 1991
stucco exterior and all labor and materials to hang and
finish interior for the Community Center at Immokalee
Co~uauntty Park. Copies to Netl Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John
Yonkosk¥, and filed.
25.
Notice to Owner dated October 1, 1991, to Harper Brothers,
Inc., and BCC, from M.D. Moody & Sons, Inc., under an order
given by Manares Underground, Inc., for various rental equip-
ment for Radio Road Widening Phase I. Copies to Neil
Dorrlll, Steve Camell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
26.
Copy to BCC of Preliminary Notice to Owner dated October 2,
1991, to Seaboard Surety from Thompson Pump & Mfg. Co., Inc.,
under an order given by Florida State Underground, for dewa-
tering pumps/equipment for the improvement of the real pro-
perty identified as Phase I Radio Road Widening. Copies to
Nell Dorrtll, Steve Carnell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
Notice to Owner dat,~d October 4, 1991, to Collier County from
Lightning Protection Systems, Inc., under an order given by
Hendry Electric, for lightning Protection System for Collier
County Library. Copies to Nell Dorrtll, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
Satisfaction of Ctv:[1 Judgment Lien in Case #89-4347-MMA
bearing the date 7/:!9/91. Copy to Misdemeanor Department,
and filed.
Memorandum to BCC f~'om Sheriff Don Hunter enclosing Fiscal
Year 1992 Budget fox' Collier County Sherlff's Office. Filed.
2,3 ·
Notice of Intent to Consider Development Agreement between
0onkltn Point Development Corporation and Collier County.
Copies to Neil Dorr]11, Frank Brutt, BCC and filed.
Xteu~16L1
K~Et~tITXON OF AM~NZ~NT TO A~I~KEMKNT FOR COLLKCTXON OF MANDATORY SOLID
M[~TI[ OO~[~=TXON SPECIAL ASSBSSMKFrS
See Pages
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
i~il..i..meettng was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 1:50 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
oFFicio GOVERNING BOARDIS)
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
PATRICIA ANNE GOODNIG%~T, CHAIRMAN
" These'nh[nutes approved by the Board on
as presented or as corrected
J! 84
Page 31