BCC Minutes 05/10/1994 RNaples, Florida, May 10, 1994
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in R~ULAR SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine
VICE-CHAiRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews
John C. Norris
Michael J. Volpe
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: Marilyn Fernlay and Sue Barbiretti, Deputy Clerks;
Dwight Brock, Clerk of Courts; Nail Dotrill, County Manager; Jennifer
Edwards, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney;
Richard Yovanovich, Heidi Ashton and David Bryant, Assistant County
Attorneys; Russ Muller, Traneporta~ion Engineer; Mike McNees, Acting
Utilities Administrator; Ann Marie Saylot, Utilities Administrative
Assistant; Ron Cook, Utilities Finance Director; Tom Conracode, Office
of Capital Projects Management Director; Dick Clark, Acting Community
Development Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation
Services Administrator; Mike Smykowski, Acting Budget Director; Leo
Ochs, Ad~lnistrative Services Administrator; Jeff Walker, Risk
Management Director; Sandra Taylor, Real Property Management Director;
Fred Bloatschef, Senior Project Manager; Bill Lorenz, Environmental
Services Administrator; Ron Ming and Bryan Milk, Project Planners;
James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division Administrator; Deputy Rosa
Hernandez-White, Collier County Shertff's Office; and Sue Ftlson,
Administrative Assistant to the Board.
Page
Tape
(31)
APPROVED ~/TH CHA~GES
10, 1994
Commieeloner Saunderm moved, emcondad by Con/oo/oner Volpe end
col'Fled 4/0 (Commissioner hithews out), to approve the agenda with
the chingee u detmt/ed on the Agenda Change Sheet end the following
Additional item.
1. Item 16A1 - Scrtvener'8 error at the bottom of Page 1 of the
proposed resolution should be corrected to read Fifty-Four
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars.
Page 2
CO~SI~TA~K~DA - APPROVED ABD/OR ADOPTED
Nay lO, 1994
The ~otton for approval of the consent agenda is noted under
Ite~e16.
(128)
NIIIUT~ OP THE I~0ULAR MEETING OF APRIL 26, 1994 - APPROVED
Conieeloner Volpe moved, macended h~ Canisstoner Norrio and
carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
A~ril 26, 2994.
lte~#4A
· MPLOY~ SE~VXCEAWARDS - PReSEnTED
Commissioner Saunders congratulated the following employees for
service with Collier County Government:
Debra A. Swigart - 5 Years, EMS Presented
John R. Houldsworth - 5 Years, Community Development Presented
Shatton G. Cornellson - 5 Years, OCPM Presented
Bill L. Finch - 10 Years, Parks and Recreation Not Presented
Sandra D. Renne - 5 Years, EMS Not Presented
(10s)
Xta#4Bl
PROCLAMATXON ~tLUTXNG TH~ NINI~RS OF TH~ !~CYCLE COLLIER ~JtT POSTER
COIIT~T OF 1994 AS NELL AS MASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY FOR
M&EIII~ TH~ CONTEST POSSIBL~ - ADOPTED
Upon reading of the Proclamation, Coliaaioner Volpe moved,
seconded by CommilliOnOr Norr~l and carried unanimously, that the
~oclmtAon saluting the u~erl of the Re~cle Collier Oreat Poorer
C~teot of X994 me wll me Maote M~ageMn~ of Collier Catty for
~l~ tb c~eot ~ooAb~e ~ ~op~ed.
Proclamation accepted bW Bri~anw .ol~Ade~, Danielle Eoopman,
Am~da KleAn, Maraca Fredrickson, Aohle~ nel~ and Jessica reidman,
otudento a~ VAneFards KlementarF School.
Page 3
( B2)
2t~#412
PROCLAMATION DUZ~JIATING TR~ N~ OF KAY 15-21,
F~LZCNO!~Y~ N~KIC - ADOPTED
May 10, 1994
199· A8 ~ATZOIEAL
Upon reading of the Proclamation, Commissioner Matth~N~ moved,
~com$ld b~ Col~leelonar Vo2~)l end carried ~l~ly, tht the
~11c ~r~ ~ ~ adoptS.
~d Imt, Collier County Transportation Services Sentor Bn9tneer,
accepted the Proclamation.
Page ·
May 10~ 1994
(428)
DOZlX&~Z~, ~Z~Z~ S~YZCXS DZYZSZOX, ]~CO0~ZZ~Z) J~g I;)!Z~I O~
Donna Holm, Utility Services Division, recognized as Employee of
the Month for May, 2994 and presented with a $50.00 check and a
plaque.
(492)
lt~,4D
IV~PORT ON NALEAM~RXCA CHALLUGI - PR~SENTID BY RUSS MULLER
Russ Nuller, Transportation Engineer, stated that the Collier
County team was second in the WalkAmerica Challenge for most monies
raised with $9,600 and first for the biggest team. He explained that
Internal awards went to Clerk of Courts for most walkers,
Transportation Services raised the most money with $4,886, the first
place finisher was Pep Saldana, Facilities Management, and the Indivi-
dual to raise the moat money was Marquita King, Transportation
Administration, with $1,680.
(e o)
Zt~u#5
~ &M~DIdI:]ITS 94-291, 94-S64, 94-369 ~ 94-377 - ADOPTND
Acting Budget Director M~ke Smykowski requested adoption
of the four (4) routine Budget Amendments as shown in the Executive
Summary.
Commissioner Volpe etated that Budget Amendment 94-364 indicates
that $5,000 was the cost for advertising the position of
Communications Manager in newspapers throughout the State of Florida.
He Indicated that the cost is excessive and other approaches for soli-
citing resumes should be researched.
~Jlsl~r Sa~brm ~ovad, mmcond~d by Commissioner NorrAm and
carried ~i~oumly, that ~dget ~n~ntm 94-29~, 94-364, 94-369 ~d
94-377 ~ ~t~.
(724)
~'8 ~ - NO ~ZON T~
O{}OP, r,: i4
Page 5
May los 1994
FRE~ENTATZON OF THE AUDZTB, REPORTS AND ~AGEM~f LETTER A~ REQUZRED
BY T~EAUDZTOR GENERAL - PRESENTED
Dwight Brock, Clerk of Courts, stated that he is present to
answer any questions the Board may have regarding the management
letter previously supplied. He explained that the auditor and manage-
ment letter conunents regard activities within various County Agencies.
He Indicated that the conunents were distributed to the affected
departments with a request for responses to each comment and those
responses are incorporated in the letters sent to the Auditor General
as required by law.
Commissioner Matthews stated that two (2) items that appeared
last year are included again this year regarding the Utilities
Division and the responses are the same as the prior year. She
explained that the late fees on water btl~s and automation of the
accounts receivable system are in question.
Mike McNeea, Acting Utilities Administrator, indicated that the
automation of the receivables is a component of the County overall
automation study that is taking place this summer. He etated that the
program for late charges on the utility bills is ready for implemen-
tation and should be presented to the Board of County Commissioners
for approval within six to eight (6-8) weeks, or less.
Commissioner Matthews questioned when the automation of accounts
receivable will be completed because she does not want to see it
appear again on the report next year.
Mr. McNees explained that a full recommendation for the automa-
tion system is due to the Board of County Commissioners by the end of
oululer, 1994.
Commissioner Matthews questioned why an actuarial evaluation for
stop loss coverage is not recommended and if the County haa any poten-
tial claim8 that might exceed the insurance coverage?
Jeff Walker, Risk Management Director, stated that in the five
Page 6
Nay 10, 1994
(5) years that the program has been in place, there have been two (2)
instances In which the County has exceeded the specific stop loss
coverage. He explained that there are two (2) types of stop loss:
specific which Is an individual claim and the County currently retains
the first $100,000; and aggregate which ts protection for the entire
fund so that the accumulation of retained claims do not exceed a cer-
tain amount In a given year.
Mr. Walker Indicated that since the County caps losses In the
aggregate, an actuartal study becomes less important to be conducted
each year and estimating liabilities can be performed in-house. He
explained that the maximum Is $500,000 and the County has funded
approximately 75 percent of that amount each year.
In response to Commissioner Natthews, Mr. Walker stated that
the Southfield Farms case to the only claim where coverage to being
afforded under a Reservation of Rights that could exceed the limits.
He explained that a number of legal issues are being addressed by the
County Attorney°s Office and must be completed prior to determining
the actual liability.
David Bryant, Assistant County Attorney, explained that the
County Attorney's Office does not believe that Southfield Farms will
be successful in the case. He Indicated that the lawsuit t8 in the
amount of $7 million and to being opposed vigorously.
Mr. Bryant stated that a number of cases exposes the County to
large amounts of money, especially with the Shertff's Office. He
pointed out that the financial risk is real but the County~s position
is very defensible.
Mr. Walker stated that Government Accounting Standards Board
(GASB) Ruling No. Ten (lO) te expected this year and Indicates that a
certain amount of case development Is necessary before applying
liability.
Commissioner Natthews stated that the County cannot Imply that
there Is very little risk because the likelihood that claims
exceed the coverage Is very small when the risk is very real.
Page ?
May lO, 1994
Co~mteeloner Matthews questioned when the disaster recovery plan
will be complete?
County Manager Dotrill stated that It pertains to the financial
automation system.
Clerk Brock explained that within a month or two (1-2) the cost
figures will be available for implementing the disaster recovery plan
and will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for
approval before the next fiscal year.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Dotrill indicated that
the MIS Master Plan for the entire County is being directed by a
Committee chaired by Paul Brigham, Court Administrator, and the draft
report will be completed in June and will be presented to the Board
upon completion.
Clerk Brock Informed that all constitutional agencies will be to
communicate over the network when completei.
Commissioner Matthews questioned when the improved back-up and
recovery system for the Utilities Division will be complete?
Ron Cook, Utilities Finance Director, stated that three (3) weeks
ago the tapes necessary to implement the back-up and recovery system
were purchased and is within approximately two (2) weeks of being
on-line.
Commissioner Norris ~ov~, seconded by Commissioner Matthew~ and
c~rled 4/0 (Cmleetoner Saunders out) to accept the Clerkto
(~20)
CONNECT TO COLLIEIt COUNTY SEWER FACILITIIS AND NOTICI OF IMPACT FEE
8TATEMKFf FOR THE EAST AND SOUTH NAPLES SANITARY 8KWKR PROJZCT -
APPROVED
Ann Marie Saylot, Utilities Administrative Assistant, stated the
change in the Financing Agreement Is to incorporate the delinquent
Interest and two (2) are Included In the Executive Summary; one
applies to condominium and commercial properties where Impact fees are
over $6,000 and up-front charges are paid at the time the Agreement Is
Page 8
Nay ~0, 1994
signed, I.e. title search and documentary stamps~ and the other
sgreement ts for residential property and additions! charges can be
incorporated in the Agreement. She Indicated that execution of the 28
cosuaercial property Claims of Liens is also being requested. Ms.
Saylot explained that 260 properties remain that have not taken
action to connect to the County sewer system and those properties will
also be pursued.
In response to Co~lssioner Volpe, Ms. Saylot Instructed that the
properties will be liened to collect the Impact fees and means of
enforcing the actual connection is under investigation.
Richard Yovanovtch, Assistant County Attorney, stated that
Ordinance No. 86-67 gives the Board the authority to physically con-
nect the property and then seek to recover the cost by billing or
foreclosing. He Indicated that Staff reco~ends that the Code
Enforcement Board be utilized to enforce tLe connection or the Court
system and request a demand that the property owner connect. He
explained that once the Court declares that the property owner must
connect, then the County can be authorized to physically connect the
property and seek to recover costs.
Co~tsstoner Volpe requested that the County Attorney's Office
present for Board~s review a recommendation to require the
connections.
Mr. NcNees pointed out that by taking the property owners before
the Code Enforcement Board, the best the County can achieve is a dally
fine which will be hard to collect if the owners cannot afford the fee
for connecting to the system in the first place.
Mr. McNees stated that Staff feels that by starting to apply
liens, the property owners will realize the County is serious and they
will agree to sign the Financing Agreements.
Commissioner Volpe stated that the system has been on-line for
two (2) years and something must be done to connect these properties.
Mr. McNees stated that the Board can direct Staff to pursue
enforcing the connection and then ltentng the property for the
Page 9
Nay 10, 1994
expense but Staff is not recommending that progressive action even
though the County has the right and legal authority.
Commissioner Constantine explained that the County has made a
program available and by 11entng the properties, the o~ners
realize that the County is serious which is a more reasonable plan of
action.
Ns. Saylot Informed the Board that Staff is discovering some very
extreme hardship properties through the Hardship Program.
Ns. Saylor stated that names and addresses of contractors and
others willing to assist In the connections at a reduced price has
been supplied to the Committee representing the hardship properties
but no response has been received.
Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Services Administrator,
stated that several contractors have voiced interest In assisting the
hardship casa and he to pursuing the matte. further.
Commissioner Morris moved, seconded by Couutsstoner Matthews and
g~z~i~ 4/0 (Commias/o~r Serra ~at) to mpprov~ a~tion of the
Cla/m~ 0£ Lion ~nd that changes be incorporated in the F/noncing
&greecerite to include interest earned on delinquent impact fees.
Page 10
Nay 10, 1994
(2072)
ltem~8K~
RISOLUTZON 04-34,3 AUTHORTZTN(J THE NORTH NAPLES FIRE AND RKSCUE
DX~ltXCT TO UTXLXZE COUNTY O~I~D PROPERTY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE
CURRENT COUNTY LXBRARY ON VANDERBXLT BEACH DRIVE XN ACCORDANCE WXTH
Sandra Taylor, Real Property Management Director, stated that the
North Naples Fire and Rescue District is desirous of modifying
Article 3, Rent, Section 2 to read "Upon written request by the COUNTY
for emergency service space at any existing facility owned by the
LESSEE, the LESSEE may provide such space in its sole discretion and
upon terms mutually agreeable."
Me. Taylor explained that the objectionable language is basically
to include nominal rental payments should the County request any of
the District's property, If available. She stated that the District
is recommending eliminating that language and inserting acceptable
terms and conditions upon the County's request of any District
property.
Commissioner Volpe stated that when the long term lease was
entered into for $1.00, the understanding was that the rate would be
the same $1.00 if the County needed space for emergency services.
Attorney John Cardtile, representing the Fire Commission, stated
that the Fire Commission does not object to the County utilizing space
on behalf of EMS but feel that the proposed language is more
acceptable. He explained that the issue is who makes the deter-
mination as to the availability of the property.
Mr. Cardills explained that there is no problem with including
"nominal consideration" after "...upon terms mutually agreeable." in
Article 3, Section 2, of the Lease Agreement.
Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, explained that the
language recommended by Staff which caused the problem provided that
Lessee shall not unreasonably deny County's request for available
space but the Fire District's language is less restrictive.
Commissioner Volpe stated that "nominal consideration" needs to
,0°6 OC0P,
Page
Nay 10, 1994
be Included In Agreements for all facilities.
Cosm~ssioner Voll~ ~, ~co~ ~ Co~lss~o~ Norris ~d
cml~ration,' t~re~ ~opttng Resolution 94-343.
Page 12
May 10, 1994
(2891)
RISOLUTION 94-344 AUTHORIZING THI ACQUISITION OF ~ON-EXCLUSIV~
PKRPKTUAT-. ROAD RIGHT-OF-MAY KASKMKNT, DRAINAGK KASKMI'NT, MAINTKNANCE
KASI3~NTAND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF I~KCTION
IMPltOVIMJE3~ AT GOLDI3q GAT~ PARKWAY AND SANTA BARBARA BOULKVARD -
Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director,
etated that adoption of the resolution will authorize Staff to
purchase Parcel No. 112 which is required for construction and main-
tenants of improvements at Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara
Boulevard. He explained that the cost to purchase is $49,030 and
includes all fees, value of the land and severance damages.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode informed the
Board that the property is the southwest corner of the subject
lntereection.
Commllatoner Volpo Boved, seconded by Comltlllonlr M~tthewl and
c~rrled unanimously, that Parcel No. 112 be acquired, thereby adopting
Re~olutlon To. 94-344.
88
Page 13
May 10~ 1994
(2720)
~teueOH2
ACCI:FTANCE OF TH~ DOJLI~TION OF NECESSARY LAND IJJTKR~ST fOR PARCKL 114
(CIROU) AID AUTHORITY TO PAY SEVERANCE DAMAGK$ TO PROPKRTY OMNKR FOR
ROAD RIGRT-OF-~t~Y ZMPR~S (OFFICE OF CAPITJI~ liZaRdS PRO3~CT
NO, 62081) - ACCEPTED AND SKVKRA~CK DAMAGES PAYMKNT APPROVED
Tom Conrecede, Office of Capital Projects Management Director,
stated that the subject parcel Is located at the intersection of
Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. He explained that
the owners have agreed to donate the property but considerable impro-
vement exist. Mr. Conrecede indicated that Staff investigated two (2)
options for re~ocattng the improvements: Option No. ! represents a
total cost to the County of $20,200; and Option No. 2 represents a
cost of $26,250 but the owners agree to take the responsibility for
relocating the ~mprovements.
Mr. Conrecede stated that Staff t8 recommending approval of
Option No. 2.
~1881oner Siunderl moved, leeended by Conilltoner Norrio and
curted unanA~ov~l¥, to accept the donation and to approve the
· ~v~rance da~ag~l p~im~nt of 026,250.
Page 14
May 10, 1994
Xtem ~8B3 - Cont/nued to Meeting of May 17, 1994
(2810)
Zte~#8H4
AMARD OF BID NO, 94-2174 FOR FRONT-MOUNTeD FOUR (4) WHEEL DRIVE
MO~ER - CONTINUED TO MEETING OF MAY 17, 1994
James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division Administrator, stated
that Staff is recommending award of Bid No. 94-2174 for a front-
mounted four (4) wheel drive mower to Naples Rent-All and Sales
Company in the amount of $13,816.49. He explained that nine (9} pro-
poeale were received but six (6) did not meet bid specifications,
Commissioner Norris stated that the specifications are rigid and
appear directed toward a particular brand or piece of equipment which
may have prohibited bidding on a comparable piece of equipment.
Commissioner Constantine requested that the responses from all
vendors be submitted.
Commissioner Samriders ~ovsd, seconded by Commissioner Norris and
c~rrled unanimously, that this item be continued to the meeting of
Mary 1T, 1994.
In response to County Manager Dotrill, Commissioner Constantine
informed that Staff is to supply both the rational and more infor-
mation on this item, including the RFP which was distributed and all
responses from the vendors.
~ O~ ~ID NO. 94-2~8~ 70 NI~C~L & $~JLRX ZN T~E J~10~!l~ OF $42o~4B
FOItB~LT FItESS NiLENAYS AT THE SOUTH COLLIER COUNTYREGIONAL
Tom Conracode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director,
stated that on April 13, 1994 bids were opened for the Belt Press
Walkways at the South Collier County Wastewater Treatment Plant for
safety reasons. He explained that two (2) vendors secured the bid
package and only Mitchell & Stark submitted a bid in the amount of
$42,245.
Mr. Conracode stated that Staff is requesting award of the bid to
Page 15
May 10, 1994
Mitchell & Stark and authorization to effect budget amendment
transfers.
Commiesloner Matthews stated that this is the Lely plant and it
ts uncertain at this time whether an expansion will take place.
Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the /east likely option
is to close the plant completely.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecede etated that this
Is a metal system.
Fred Bloatschar, Senior Project Manager, stated that the walkways
will be utilized to clean the belt press and the operators are
currently using /adders which are unsafe. He explained the walkways
should have been addressed in the original design of the plant.
Cad. isotoner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Natthews
~nd C~Tiedm~nl~ously, that Bid No. 94-2183 for belt press ~lkways
at the South Collier County Regtor~l Wastewater TreatMnt Plant be
~warded to Mitchell & Stark in the ~a~unt of $42,245.
(3251)
RESOLUTION 94-345 DECLARING TRAT RATES FOR BASIC SERVICE AND EQUIPMENT
K~MAINSUBJ~CT TO REVIeW AND FURTHER R~DUCTIONAND REFUND; AND
ORDERING COLONY CABLEVISION TO K~EP ADEQUATE ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS SO
THAT IT CAN PAY ANY ADDITIONAL REPIINDS ORDERED - ADOPTED
Commissioner Saunders aoved. seconded by Commissioner Norris and
carried un~nt~u~ly, to issue an order to Colony Cablevision of
Florid~ regarding regulation of rates, thereby adopting Re~olution
g4-148.
Page 16
:Item rOA - Deleted
May 10, 1994
Receoood: 10:30 A.H. - Reconvsned: 10:40 A.H. &t which time
Deputy Clerk Ba~blrsttt replaced DeputF Clerk ,crnley
(3299)
R~SOLUTlOI 94-346 RE KMZJ~]IT DOMAIN CASE I0. 92-4315-CA-01-TB RELATZIG
TO ~ POZIT MARCO PARKZNG LOT ZSSUE - ADOPTKD; SETTLKMKNT AGR~KMX]qT
- APPROVED
County Attorney Cu¥1er stated that this ~tem ks a settlement
agreement (copy not provided to Clerk's Office} at:lpulat~on for the
Board to consider as a basks for a stipulated f~nal Judgemen~
wou~d conc]ude ~he eminent domain ~ga~on. He sta~ed ~hat
B (copy no~ provided ~o C~e=k~s office) Js one o~ ~he ~h=ee options
~ha~ had previously been approved by the Board and forwarded
Harco Zs~and C~v~c Association (HICA) for their review. He sa~d
~he Boa=d had ~nd~ca~ed ~ha~ ~ ~ou]d be s~sf~ed wJ~h any of the
options.
Co~y Attorney Cuyler corrected some t~ograph~cal errors ~n the
agreemen~ for clarification.
T~ ~
Co~y Attorney Cuyler reviewed the h~ghlights of the agreement.
He stated there w~11 be two parking lots, 70 spaces each w~th all the
conditions prev~ousl~ reviewed by the Board. He ea~d that once
approved releases will be ~rovtded ~ed~ately and convey~ces ~n 60
days. He stated that the s~e conditions apply for the MICA lot and
the Co~ty lot. He sa~d that the County will construc~ Its lot a~ its
o~ cost ~d the developer w~11 construct the MICA lot. He stated
tha~ the MICA lo~ will consle~ of 2.1 acres, w~Th one acre used as a
parking ~o~ and one acre designated for open space. He ea~d that the
Comfy lot le one acre.
Co~ty Attorney Cuyler stated that the Developer Enforcement and
Deed Restriction provisions are on page 7. He said that the developer
c~ ~re the default and charge the County or MICA. He said that one
provls~on provides that MICA also has enforcemen~ ablli~les ~n the
Page
May 10, 1994
event that he County does not comply with the agreement, they do
not have a reverter clause, that remains with the developer.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that page 8, refers to the reverter
provisions. He said that the developer has indicated that he is not
interested In reclaiming the property so two or three options are
listed.
Mr. Cuyler stated that the Marco Island Residents Beach
Association (MIRBA) to a party to this agreement for the limited pur-
pose of a release of claims.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the reverter on the beach
access will also be released as part of this agreement.
Mr. Cuyler announced that the developer has indicated that the
developer Is waiving the attorney's fees, which amount to approxima-
tely $40,000.00. He said that MICA is still requesting full payment
of their attorney's fees, which amount to approximately $30,000.00.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the County Is responsible for
payment of claims for any other defendants In the eminent domain. He
said that there were two utilities involved. He stated that the esti-
mated fees of one is less than $500.00, assuming that their easements
were not disturbed. He stated that the attorney's fees for Southern
States is approximately $6,000.00.
Mr. Cuyler stated that the County is not agreeing to that request.
He said that will still be a subject of debate and is not part of this
agreement.
The following people spoke on the subject:
Harry Cowin John Turner
David E. Brunet
Commissioner Volpe asked how the issue of non ad-valorem taxes
will be resolved?
County Attorney Cuyler stated that he expects the developer to pay
through 1993 and the County would be responsible as of January 1,
1994. He stated that the Board has the ability to waive the taxes
if it is a deed to the County for public purpose. He said that MICA
,o0 000 , 105
Page 18
May 10, 1994
would be responsible for their own.
Coaalsstoner Volpe recalled that a sidewalk would be provided
along Swallow Avenue to provide for pedestrian traffic to the beach.
He asked who would construct the sidewalk.
County Attorney Cuyler replied that it Is shown as an existing
sidewalk on his map.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Cuyler stated that the
developer w111 have to produce a deed clear of liens which will enable
the developer to give the County a release of mortgage.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, County Attorney Cuyler
explained that when the parking lot is locked the chances of vandalism
is minimal. He said that the intent of the security clause in the
agreement is to insure that when the lot is full the County will pro-
vide some type of guard to prevent parking on the grass or on other
properties. He confirmed that this is a oeed restriction.
Commissioner Matthews expressed concern regarding the fact that
the County will have to maintain the lot to satisfy the developer and
MICA at all times.
Commissioner Volpe remarked that this Is a Code Enforcement issue.
He stated that the County provides security to all Its facilities.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the property does not revert
because of this restriction. He said that there Is an enforcement
mechanism.
Commissioner Matthews stated that the County may be setting up a
situation similar to Lely Barefoot Beach.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Cuyler explained that
when the County filed the eminent domain case a number of defendants
were named. He said that MICA, the developer, the mortgagee, some uti-
lities companies and some successors in interest were named as defen-
dants. He said that one of the successors in interest is Lee County
Cooperative, adding that their attorney fees, to which they are
entitled, total approximately $500.00. He reiterated that Southern
States Utilities is claiming $6,000.00 in attorney fees, which the
106
Page 19
Hay 10, 1994
County has not agreed to. He emphasized that whether the County
approves the agreement or not the defendants must be dealt with. He
confirmed that the pa~ent clause pertains only to the defendants in
the existing eminent domain case.
Commissioner Natthews expressed concern regarding Item lOB,
regarding MICA being Included in the rights of the developer.
Co~uatsstoner Constantine recalled that last year the County had
the opportunity to construct a parking lot for the cost of construc-
tion and certain architectural requirements. He said that the total
cost of the parking lot would have been approximately $550,000.00.
Co~alsstoner Constantine said that today the County can acquire
half the number of parking spaces with a great deal of restrictions
Including attorney fees. He stated that the other option is to pursue
eatnent domain. He remarked that the County could potentially pay
$900,000.00 for the property, pay $500,000 O0 to build out the pro-
perry and pay attorney fees for eminent domain for a total cost of
approximately 2 million dollars.
Commissioner Constantine asked George Varnadoe, attorney
for the property owner, whether the property owner would require the
County to pay full price for the property if the County were to pursue
eminent domain?
Mr. Varnadoe replied that he was unable to answer because that was
not one of the three options presented for consideration.
Commissioner Constantine asked if the entire lot was still
available to the County?
Mr. Varnadoe stated that he had not d~acussed the possibility with
his client. He recalled that purchasing the property would require
the County to pursue the eminent domain proceeding and would require
that the lot be built to the standards of the approved Site
Development Plan. He recalled that the improvements would cost
approximately $800,000.00.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Varnadoe confirmed that the
site plan he has shows an existing sidewalk along Swallow Avenue. He
107
Page 20
May IO, 1994
stated that if that is not the case, his cItent will assume the
responsibility of installing the sidewalk.
Commissioner Saunders commented that he has no objection to the
County spending $900,000.00 to pursue the eminent domain proceeding
to obtain public parking space because public parking is needed in
Collier County. He said that this agreement will result in obtaining
70 parking spaces at a cost of $200,000.00, thereby saving
$700,000.00. He requested that the Board condition the approval of
this agreement with a commitment to use the remaining $700,000.00 to
acquire public parking somewhere in the unincorporated area of Collier
County.
Commissioner Constantine agreed with the suggestion. He asked
that a more specific area for the acquisition be clarified.
Commissioner Matthews reminded the Board that access to the
beaches Is via parking. She stated that t?~ long range picture must
be considered.
Commissioner Norris remarked that the Board is committed to
Increasing public parking. He said that he objects to this method not
the result. He stated this course of action has violated a commit-
ment that there never be public parking in that area. He indicated
that this action also attacks private property rights and fostered
animosity between citizens. He said that whether he believes this is
a good solution or not, this Is the point the County is at and must be
acted upon.
Co~iuloner Norris ~oved to approve this settlement a~ree~ent
an~ ~he stipulltion to foma basis or & stipulated final Judgment
concl~t~ e~lnent domin Cmme No. 92-4315-CA-O1-TB0 seconded by
~issio~er Volpe.
County Attorney Cuyler requested that the motion Include that the
County Attorney be authorized to proceed with the items mentioned
earlier and that the agreement will be approved with an authorizing
Resolution.
Cm~issioner Norris ~ree~ to ~nd hie ~otion to include this
Page 21
May 10, 1994
l~ge. Seconded by Commissioner Volpa.
Commissioner Saunders asked the Board If they would commit the
money saved through this agreement to acquire property In Collier
County for public access.
Commissioner Volpe agreed to the concept. He stated the he could
not commit to a dollar amount.
Commissioner Norris ~ov~d to ~uaend his ~otton to Include that the
Parks and Recreation Staff be directed to prepare a report on suitable
locations for exp~ndad public parking.
Commissioner Saunders agreed to support the motion.
Commissioner Constantine expressed concern regarding the restric-
tions contained in the agreement.
Commissioner Natthews requested that the language on Page 4, Item
9, be changed or eliminated.
Nr. Vernadoe stated If the language Is changed or eliminated his
client would not sign the agreement because his client did not want
the responsibility of security.
Commissioner Natthews stated that she does not know what the
security level is that the County may have to provide in order to
insure that vandalism and unauthorized use is avoided.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Nr. CowIn, NICA representative,
stated that NICA relies primarily on the Shertff's Office for
security.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Nr. CowIn replied that NICA
would not expect the County to do anymore than NICA does to insure
security.
Commissioner Natthews stated that she is concerned with including
NICA In the enforcement clause, Page ?, Item 10B. She said that the
County may have to enforce measures.
Commissioner Natthews announced that she would not support the
motion. She stated that this parking lot should be a public lot and
that all remedies have not been explored.
Commissioner Saunders stated that although he agrees In principal,
Page 22
Nay 10, 1994
all reaedIee have been explored.
Conissioner Constantine stated that he will support the motion
under protest. He stated that although this is not the perfect solu-
tion, the Board has verbally committed itself to address the need for
public parking.
Opon call for the question, the ~otton carried: 4/1 (toutsstoner
N~tth~e~ oppowed), thereby adopting Re~olutlon 94-346.
Psge 23
~a¥ 10, 1994
(22~9)
It~LOTX~ 94-347 IrE COLLX~t ~D LI~ COUNTY !q~D~NG FOR LOV~ ~NY
~TATI PAI~- ~DOFTID
CouLsstoner ConstantLne stated that th~s Lssue had been dlscussed
at the Joint meeting with the Lee County CommtssLon.
In response to Co~mlssioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler con-
firmed that the Resolution included In the ExecutLve Su~aary followed
the Lee Cotmty foraat.
ColBtlltOner Saunders ~, second~ ~ Co~t~1oner Norr~l, ~d
c~l~ ~~1~, to I~r~e the Joint re~olutton, there~ adopting
~lut~ 9&-347.
Page 24
May ~0~ ~994
(22s2)
Ztel ~gD
FORD MOTOR COMFAWY FOR & TEST VEHICLE TO BE USED BY
TRANSPORT&TION SERVICES - APPROVKD
Commissioner Constantine stated that the Ford Motor Company has a
test van with a 1998 engine. He said that the Ford Motor Company had
asked tf the County could utilize the van for testing purposes.
Commissioner Constantine stated that the van will be used pri-
marily for Veterans Transportation Services.
Assistant County Attorney Manaltch indicated that a few minor
changes will be made to the agreement.
Commiuion~r Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders, to
mpprovm the agreement with the lord NotoF Company.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Constantine stated
that the Ford Notor Company will maintain the vehicle.
gpo~ call for the question, the motion carried unanimously.
Page 25
Nay 10, 1994
Ztem#lO&
COIBIITHZ'I'Y RZDEV~,OPI,I~X~ &G~NCY ]POX ~JLS? ~/L~T~S - S~&,I'*IP DZI~ZC'T~D ~0
Cosuaiss/oner Volpe stated that the concept of Community
Redevelopment Agencies for the unincorporated areas of the County had
been d/scussed previously.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that the first area to be investi-
gated would be East Naples, beginning at the Intersection of U.S. 41
and Davis Boulevard and out to Airport Road.
Commissioner Volpe announced that the first step in the process is
conceptualization to see the amount of interest. He stated that the
next step would be to identify an area that would qualify under the
law as an appropriate area and to solicit the support of the property
owners within the Identified area.
Commissioner Norris stated that this is a good idea. He asked if
the area described would be the only area Included.
Commissioner Volpe stated that he did not intend to exclude any
area. He ~uggested that the Board give direction to Staff to begin
the process of creating a Community Redevelopment Agency focusing on
the East Naples area,
Commissioner Constantine agreed that East Naples needs the atten-
tion but stated that he is not sure if this is the appropriate first
step. He said that the proposed Council of Economic Advisors will
focus attention to the East Naples area. He suggested that the first
step would be to tap into local talent.
Co~uaissioner Volpe stated this item is really an attempt to bring
property owners together to see what could be done to improve the
area. He said that the idea is to begin the process.
Commissioner Saunders stated that he agreed with both Commissioner
Volps and Commissioner Constantine. He said that the consideration of
a Community Redevelopment Agency is worth exploration. He suggested
that the Board direct Staff to begin generating the information as
Page 26
May 10, 1994
wuggested by Commissioner Volpe, but after the Council of Economic
Advisors is formed they review this Issue as well as Staff.
Dudley Goodlette spoke on the issue.
Coum/ssioner Volpe moved to direct Staff to begin the process of
the study that w~uld be the pre-requisite to the determination of the
creation of a Community Redevelopment Agency.
Commissioner Constantine asked how much time would be necessary
for the Long Range Planning Staff to collect the information?
Com/setoner Norris seconded the motion on the floor.
County Nanager Dotrill stated that Long Range Planning would work
with assistance from the Budget Office and the Property Appraiser's
Office.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried unanimously.
see lq~cese: 12:15 PM - Reconvened: 1:35 PM At this time Deputy
Clerk Fernlay replaced Deputy Clerk Barblretti 0..
(3309)
Item#12B1
ORDZILUICE 94-25 RE PETITION PUD-84-25(1), ROBERT 3. GR&Y O~ STR&T~GIC
PL&INZNO GROUP, INC., REPRESENTING NJLPLES &SSOCIATES LI~ITB:D
PARTJIERSHIP, RE(:~J~ITING A RKZORE FROM PUD TO PUD ~OR THE FRO3~CT KNOWN
AS PTIE&IR LAI:ES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AMENDING THE CURRENT PUD
~ J~D le. lkST~t PLAN BY DELETING TR~ HOTEL/INSTITUTIONAL USE
C&T~GORY, Jt~V~SZNG THE PUD MASTER PLAN AND BY MAKING SUCH OTHER
CHANGES TO THE PUD TO REFLECT CURRENT LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REFKRKNCKS
AND POLICY PRACTICES - ADOPTED
This item is a companion to Item #12C1 and Item #12C2.
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 21, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication f/led with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Ron Nino, Senior Project Planner, stated that Petition
PUD-84-25(1) represents amendments to the Pine Air Lakes Development
of Regional Impact (DRI) which is also a Planned Unit Development
(PUD).
Mr. Nino explained that the amendment lowers the intensity of
development by approximately 25 percent and accomplishes five (5)
things: (1) reduces the total development intensity from 1,280,600
square feet to 957,000 square feet by eliminating the
Page 27
Hay 10, 1994
hotel/institutional use provisions in the Development Order repre-
senting a reduction of 205,000 square feet and reducing the office
space allocation by 118,600 square feet; (2) extends the build-out
date by four (4) years, six (6) months or from April 15, 1996 to
October 15, 2000 and subjects the Development Order to the County
Concurrenc-/ Management System; [3) commits the developer to build
three (3) commercial complexes or projects of at least 70,000 square
feet each containing retail uses generally found in a shopping center;
(4) provides that approval cannot be down-zoned for a period of ten
(lO) years from the date of this amendment provided development com-
mences in five (5) years; and (5) streamlines the PUD to assure
compliance with current Land Development Codes since the original PUD
was approved in 1985.
Tape ~3
Mr. Nino stated that the amendments a-e consistent with the
Growth Management Plan and the Planning Commission unanimously recom-
mended approval. He indicated that changes in the PUD document are
reflective of the changes in the Development Order.
Mr. Nino pointed out that a revision to the master plan elimi-
nating the original 14 tract development strategy for two (2) large
tracts where a wade range of permitted land uses ie requested and is
within the limitations of the development intensity allowed by the DRI
Development Order. He stated that the PUD was amended to reflect that
the development will serve 29 acres in the Pine Ridge Industrial Park.
Attorney George Varnadoe representing the Pine Air Lakes PUD
stated that the amendments have been reviewed by the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council and the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA). He indicated that the DCA is requesting two (2) technical
changes to the concurrency language of the Development Order and does
not change the fact the Pine Air Lakes As a part of the County con-
currency program.
Mr. Varnadoe stated that a requirement that the developer reim-
burse the County for the acquisition of the right-of-way for Edgewood
Page 28
Nay 10, 1994
Drive needs to be included in the PUD documents with the stipulation
that payment be made within 90 days of this public hearing or upon the
approval of the first site development plan for the project, whichever
first occurs.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Nr. Varnadoe explained that a
regional mall is not being proposed but a down-sizing of the proposed
shopping center. He stated that the down-sizing represents an
upgrading of the facilities and downgrading of the Impacts regarding
traffic.
Co~misstoner Volpe stated that under the Development Order, only
parcels immediately adjacent to Airport Road can be developed until
Airport Road from Pine Ridge Road north is six (6) laned.
Mr. Varnadoe explained that internal parcel development cannot
take place until Edgewood Drive is complete from Airport Road to Pine
Ridge Road by the developer but is not part of the Airport Road
Improvements.
Nr. Varnadoe indicated that the existing industrial park
experienced a drainage problem and requested that the PUD accept
drainage from the 29 acres and incorporate treatment thereof in the
PUD water management system which has been included in the PUD docu-
ments to the satisfaction of the County.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Varnadoe Informed the
Board that the stipulation on down-zoning is required by law and the
oversight was pointed out by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council.
Mr. Varnadoe pointed out that the DRI Development Order will spe-
cify two (2) separate types of development, office and retail, if the
amendment is approved and to change either type will require another
Notice of Proposed Change and conduct another public hearing.
Steve Arkins, Florida Department of Community Affairs In
Tallahassee, informed the Board he is present to maintain the
Departmentts rights of appeal as provided under Florida Statutes
because there has not been enough time to evaluate the Development
Page 29
Nay 10, 1994
Order a~endments proposed in the last week.
Bill Kerrlgan spoke on this Item.
Mr. Vernadoe stated that the Development Order expires in 1996
but the zoning remains the same until the Board decides it should be
changed.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Transportation Services
Administrator Archibald stated that Staff has assurances in-place to
guarantee that traffic problems do not occur at Edgewood Drive and
Pine Ridge Road. Mr. Archibald explained that the developer has also
committed to extend funds to the County for the six (6) laning of
Airport Road north to the Pine Air Lakes entrance.
Mr. Vernadoe distributed a copy of the four (4) conditions the
developer has agreed to In order to alleviate possible traffic
problems.
County Attorney Cuyler informed the Board that the motions for
the three companion items should be made in the order of Item #12Cl,
Item #12B1 and then Item #12C2.
The ~econd ~tlon was ~ada by Comicstoner Saunders, seconded by
Co~i~ioner Norris ~nd carried un~ni~ously, that Ordinance 94-28 be
~dopted ~nd entered Into Ordinance Book No. 66, that Staff
minor revimlon~ to the PUD relative to the ~ubstttuttonm for
dtvtmton conditions and to include the four (4) conditions relative to
traffic.
lt~S01~UTXON g4-348 DETEIO~XNXNG TRAT R~VISIONS TO THE PXN~ AIR LAE~S
DEV~ ORDEIt 85-5 DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION
ItE~UIltING FUI~fHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEN - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published In the Naples Dally News on
April 24, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Discussion on this item was heard under Item #12B1. See comments
above.
Page 30
Nay 10, 1994
Cosmtestoner Conetanttne cloeed the public hearing.
1~e firs~ ~otlon~ ~ Co~isstoner Norris, seconded by
t~ P~ &It ~s ~1o~t Or~r ~ not co~tl~te
~tmtt~ ~tr/ng ~ther ~mlo~nt of Regional l~ct
t~re~ ~tt~ ~lution 94-34a.
Page 31
10, 1994
(26¢2)
Ztem#12C2
RESOLUTION 94-349 ~ DEVELOPI~XT ORDER 94-2 ANENDING DEVELOPN~I~T
~ 85-5, AS AMENDED, OF T!~ PZI~ AIR LAIRS DEVELOP!q~NT OF REGIONAL
/XP&CT (DRZ) BT AJ~Z]~DIRG SPECIFIC $ECTION8 - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 24, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Discussion on thie Item was heard under Item #12B1. See comments
above.
Couleetoner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Thm tb~rd motion was made by Coastaltoner Saundere, uconded by
C~tuton~r lottie and carried unanimously, t~t Petition DOA-94-1 be
· pprov~i, thereby adopting Reeolution 94-349 and Develolment Order
94-2 ~nd that Staff make ninor revielone to the Development Order
relattv~ to the ~ubotttuttons for ~ubdlvleton condtttor~ and Include
the four (4) condltton~ relative to traffic.
Page 32
Hay 10, 1994
(1662)
Ztem#12C3
OitDI~MI~'I 94-26 CItE&TZNG T]~ COLLZER COUNTY COURCZL OF ~CON~C
Legal notice having been pub//shed in the Naples Daily News on
April 21, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
County Attorney Cuyler stated the proposed ordinance has
undergone minor changes and establishes the Collier County Council of
Economic Advisors.
Commissioner Saunders stated that the proposed ordinance contains
language wherein the appointees are to be qualified through experience
or education and suggested that language be added that the appointees
have substantial experience in economic development.
The following people spoke on this item.
Dudley Ooodlette
A/Ion Fish
Commissioner Saunders stated that the language regarding qualifi-
cations should be expanded to include economic and business develop-
ment, economics and planning. He also suggested that up to three (3)
alternates be selected to fill vacated positions on the Council.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
ColBlliiOner Saunders loved, seconded by Cosmllsloner )Mtthelee
and carried unanimously, that Ordinance 94-26 be adopted ~nd entered
into Ordinance Book No. 66 with the suggested language change and
tncludtng <izmatel to be a17polnted.
(2232)
Itmle12C4
HC01~I~ID&TICTM ~O D~IGNATE ]K)UR (4) POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS TO THE
S~]l/Oltl~~lrz SI~V/C~ RrZZ~ CLASS - DENIED
Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on
April 24 and May 1, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication
filed with the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator, stated that this
Page 33
May 10, 199~
item is a recommendation to change the retirement designation from
Regular Class to the Senior Management Service Class for the County
Attorney, Chief Assistant County Attorney, Assistant County
Administrator and Assistant to the County Administrator position
classifications.
Mr. Ochs explained that there are five (5) classes of membership
in the Florida Retirement System and the Board of County Commissioners
contributes to the system on behalf of employees.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Ochs replied that
the retirement system for the general employees is the Regular Class
membership and 17.66 percent of base salary is contributed.
Jane Varner spoke on this item.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Co~tsaloner Constantine ~oved, seconded by Comissioner Norris
and C~XTted unanimously, to deny the recow~sndation to designate fou~
(4) position cluaiflcationa to the Senior M&nage~ent Servtca
Ztae12C5 - Co~ttnu~d to It~y 17, 1994 Meeting
(250?)
I~O~ON 94-350 R~ PETZTZON NUMBER ~DPO-94-3, RAYMOND G. ~UkRRI$,
ItH1~t~E~TX~ HIDHANAY BEACH ASSOCXATXOR, INC., REQUESTXNG A 5.5 FOOT
VA~IA~C~ Flt0~ THe MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12 ~ NGVDAS
I~~D BY THE FLOOD DAMACH PREVENTION ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE
NO. 57-50) AN INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE COLLIER COUNTY F~tND
D~ELOPM~NT CODE (ORDINANCE NO. 91-102) ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS
TRACT A, NXDEANAY BRACH SUBDIVISION - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 24 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Bryan Milk, Project Planner, stated that the Petitioner is
requesting a 5.5 foot variance from the required 12 foot flood e/eva-
tion in order to construct two (2) 50 square foot restroom facilities
underneath the existing Hideaway Beach Recreation Center at elevation
6.5 feet NGVD. He explained that the existing recreation center is
located within Tract A of the Hideaway Beach PUD, Marco Island, and
Page 34
~a¥ 10, 1994
Tract A is a commons area o~ned by the Hideaway Beach Association.
Hr. Htlk indicated that the area surrounding the recreational
area includes a nine hole golf course, tennis courts and recreation
open space.
Mr. Milk stated that actual finished floor of the building is
15.91 feet NGVD and the proposed restroom facilities will be at
6.5 feet.
Mr. Milk stated that Staff is recommending approval of the peti-
tion ~ubJect to the conditions set forth in the resolution.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Co~toelon~r S~undere moved, eeconded by ColmAseloner Volpe and
c~r~Aed~i~ou~ly, that Petition FDPO-94-3 be approved, thereby
aa~rpt~~lution 94-350.
Page 35
Zt~B #~$A2 - Continued to ~ 24, 1994
BOA~)OFCOUITT COBI~SSZONBRS' COIIdUNZCATIOXS
Nay 10, 1994
Commissioner Norris stated that the Board of County Commissioners
should deveIopa position regarding legalization of casino gambling
in Florida and Staff should define "casino" in the Land Development
Code at a minimum.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Attorney Cuyler
informed the Board that gambling will be a State regulated enterprise
if the State of Florida gives approval and counties will not be
allowed to determine if they should or should not exist.
Commissioner Constantine stated that to include gambling in the
Land Development Code at present may be premature but the issue needs
to be addressed.
Commissioner Norris stated that the RECAP program introduced to
the County by Capt. Ed Day needs to move forward.
County Manager Dorril! informed the Board that 45 positions were
~ubmttted by Capt. Day as eligible for the RECAP program but those
posit~ons are currently filled. Mr. Dotrill suggested that there are
five or six (5-6) current vacancies that are not on the list but could
be used as a RECAP pilot program in an attempt to start the program
earlier.
Commissioner Constantine stated that the Board of County
Commissioners is interested in the program and a presentation by Staff
should be made as a regular agenda item.
Co~issioner Volpe stated that residents in Bonita Springs have
raised issue with the zip code and the confusion created as to whether
they are in Lee County or Collier County.
Commissioner Constantine informed the Board that he has been in
discussion with representatives of the postal service regarding a post
office tn Golden Gate and he will discuse the confusion in Bonita
Springe during the next meeting.
OCO 279
Page 36
Hay 100 1994
Contsstoner Hatthews questioned when the renovations to
Building B are expected to commence?
County Hanager Dotrill etated that bids have been recetved for
the renovations to Building B which will function as the Elections
Office. He indicated that renovations are also necessary to the third
floor of Building F, especially the Commtseton Chambers, and a change
order to the award of contract for the third floor renovations will be
negotiated. Hr. Dorrlll explained that a conceptual budget will be
presented for the third floor renovations along with the bid award
which is expected within two (2) weeks.
County Attorney Cuyler informed the Board that an opinion has
been received from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the
Countyte right to enforce the zoning laws in regards to the First
Assembly of God Church lawsuit.
County Hanager Dorrill stated that th~ Inunokalee Foundation has
requested a special meeting on Hay 25, 1994 in Immokalee regarding a
request for a Federal Empowerment Zone designation and June ? Is the
deadline for final nomination. He indicated that the Board of County
Coeuntestonere schedule prohibited another special session tn Hay.
Conicstoner Constantine stated that a three (3) day workshop is
scheduled with County Staff and it would be appropriate for Staff to
present the outcome of the workshop to the Board prior to the June ?
deadline.
County Hanager Dotrill stated that an Ordinance prohibits Issuing
business card to representatives of County Advisory Board. He
explained that the Airport Authority has requested business cards
because of the Authortty'e separate legal status but the ordinance
will need to be amended. Hr. Dorril! requested that he be authorized
to order business cards for the chairman of the Airport Authority
tm~ediatel¥ because of his upcoming meeting in Seattle, Washington.
Cosu~iasioner Constantine stated that the chairman of the Airport
Authority will be representing Collier County at the upcoming con-
ference but business cards may not be necessary for the entire
Page 37
May 10, 1994
authority.
Adatntstratlve Assistant to the Board Ftlson stated that the
June 16, 1994 Budget Workshop needs to be rescheduled. It was the
consensus of the Board to reschedule the morning Budget Workshop
session on June 16, 1994 to the afternoon.
R~c~e~.d: 3:10 P.M. - Rsconvened: 3:20 P.M. at which
Clerk Barbtretti replace Deputy Clerk Fer~le~z
Tape#4
lteR~BG1
P!~IgTATXOI~ ~ FXRN~ APPROVED XN TH~ LAWDFXLL OPTXNXZ~TXON RF~-
2148 - ~DDI'~ITON ~NVXRONI~NTAL, INC., CHANB~R$ #AST~ ~A~T~!~ OF
FLORIDA, XNC. AIgD NA~T~ NA~AG~,~NT, INC. OF F~ORXDA SEL!eCT~D TO
Commissioner Constantine stated that presentations should take no
longer than 20 minutes and 10 minutes of questioning will follow the
presentation.
Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator, stated that
today's presentations are the first step to qualify vendors to respond
to a written Request For Proposal (RFP). He said that Staff will then
present the proposals to the Board for evaluation using Staff's pro-
Jections as a comparison.
Mr. Lorenz pointed out that once the first vendor begins the pre-
sentation, the other vendors will be asked to leave the Board Room.
Commissioner Volpe stated that an RFP had been previously pre-
pared. He asked If the new RFP will be developed based on a specific
proposal?
Mr. Lorenz stated that the RFP will be similar to the previously
Issued RFP. He said that the key to the response will be details that
involve cost proposals.
Russell Xlter, of Addington Environmental, Inc., (AEI) distributed
a presentation booklet which corresponded to a slide presentation.
He stated that an organizational chart for this project and resumes of
key staff are included in the presentation booklet.
Mr. Klter stated that Addington Resources, Inc., is the parent
Page 38
Hay 10, 1994
company and Is still managed by members of the Addington Family. He
said that the firm has an outstanding environmental record. He
pointed out that AEI designs much of its own equipment. He stated
that one of the reasons AEI remains cost competitive Is because they
utilize their own construction crews at the landfills.
Mr. Klier reviewed the reference facilities listed on Page 5. He
stated that Citrus County, Florida, recently went through a process
similar to this procedure. He said that Citrus County will retain
ownership of the landfill and AEI will be doing the capital Improve-
ments and redesign.
Nr. Klter reviewed AHI's commitments to Collier County listed on
Page 6.
Mr. Kller Indicated that he and members of his firm have visited
the landfill and suggested that the Board consider the approaches
listed on Page ? for optimization of the landfill. He briefly
reviewed the suggestions.
Mr. 11ter stated that a pro~ect team has been developed for the
Collier County pro~ect including Agnolt, Barber and Brundage, Inc.;
Ardaman and Associates, Inc.; Hodgem, Harbin, Newberry and Trtbble,
Inc.; and Waste Energy Technology, Inc.
Commissioner Saunders asked how many years were left to use the
landfill without having to expand It7
Mr. 11ter stated that the existtrig facility has ample potential.
He said that there is a great amount of airspace that redesign and
reorientatton can gather. He stated that a firm amount of time will
be provided in a fixed bid.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. llter replied that
Addington has operated its longest running landfill for five years.
Commissioner Matthews remarked that the landfill is presently
operated with County employees. She asked what was envisioned for the
existing employees?
Mr. Klier replied that good employees are a benefit to his firm.
He stated that if the employees met Addington's qualifications, they
Page 39
May lO, 1994
would Incorporate them into the operation.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Kller stated that the
height of the landfill is a critical Issue. He said that the current
landfill is designed for 107 feet due to the fact that It was set for
the width of the existing cell. He Indicated that by expanding the
footprint the triangle could be expanded,
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Klier replied that Addington
ts Involved with many community youth activities in an effort to pro-
vide better living within a community.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Klier confirmed that the
Operations Manager would report to Steven Addington, Managing
VIce-President. He said Mr. Addington is a brother to the three men
who own the majority of the company stock.
Jim Elias, Marketing Manager of Chambers Waste Systems of Florida,
Inc., (CWS} distributed an Informational package to the members of the
Board. (Copy not provided to Clerk's Office).
Mr. Elias stated that CWS was formed in 1971. He said that CWS is
based in Pittsburgh with marketing and operational offices in
Okeechobee, Florida. He stated that the southeastern operations began
In 1983.
Mr. Elias Indicated that ¢WS has the best disposal record of any
disposal company In the Country and the fourth largest company In the
Country. He said that his firm has never received a citation for any
envlrorusental liability. He said that all the facilities are designed
to exceed Federal standards for landfills and all transfer stations
are designed to exceed the local regulations.
Mr. Elias stated that CWS Is a subsidiary of Chambers Development
Company. He remarked that CWS has operated in Florida since 1992 when
his firm purchased and began the operation of the Okeechobee County
Landfill. He said that Okeechobee County is a host community; for
every ton of material brought in, the County receives a host fee bene-
fit.
Mr. Elias stated that the alternative that CWS proposes for
Page 40
~a¥ 10~ ~994
Collier County is hauling out materials, specifically for the time
before a decision is made regarding long term operation. He proposed
an alternative for Collier County; transfer out the municipal solid
waste and operate the existing landfill at a Class S operation mode.
He explained the operation of Okeechobee County landfill and revealed
that the entire capacity of the site of S,000 tons per day exceeds 125
years. He explained that the City of Fort Pierce uses route trucks to
haul material to their site. He said that they also have a long term
contract with the City of Key West. He stated that they haul from the
City of Key West to Okeechobee. He indicated that his firm offers a
state-of-the-art facility with long term disposal capacity in excess
of ZOO years.
In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Elias replied that the
only incinerator owned by Chambers is a medical waste incinerator in
Virginia.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Elias stated that the
contract with Fort Pierce is $29.50 per ton at the gate, the rate of
Increase is the Consumer Price Index (CPI). He explained that the
contract with Key West is $56.S0 per ton at the gate.
Mr. Elias stated this response is a proposal to assist the County
Staff in the planning of long term care and closure.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Elias stated that he
could not give an estimated tipping fee at this point.
In response to Commissioner Norris, County Manager Dorrill stated
that the Collier County landfill handles approximately 1,000 tons per
day.
Gary Brothington, representing Sanifil/ Rec¥cl!ng, Inc., (SRI)
stated that his firm was founded in 1990. He said that in Z992 the
company shifted strate~ to become a disposal based company. He
announced that the ultimate product Sanifill has to sell is air space.
He briefly reviewed SRI's national facilities.
Robby Howell, Southern District Manager, presented the Board with
copies of SRI's annual report. (Copy not provided to the Clerk's
Page 41
May 10, 1994
Office). He stated that Sanlftll Is the third largest landfill opera-
tor in the Country. He said that the goal of Santrill is to provide
quality service with integrity. He reviewed the qualifications of the
Staff.
Mr. Howell stated that in 1993, for every cubic yard of air space
utilized, $RI created two and one third of air space.
Mr. Howell suggested using an alternative daily cover to Increase
the longevity of Collier County landfills.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Howell explained that a
fabric or foam cover is placed over the waste material instead of
soil. He said that the material can be covered at night and removed
the next day when the filling operation resumes.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Howell stated that Saniftll
has no operations in the State of Florida.
In answer to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Howell confirmed that the
company has been operating landfills for four years.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Howell replied that
Incorporating County Staff would be a benefit to both the employees
and Santrill.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Howell stated that
SanlfIll has received no citations to date.
In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Howell stated that he has
visited both landfill sites and would step into the operation on short
notice. He confirmed that using alternative daily covers would extend
the life of the /andfill by 20~.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, County Manager Dorrtll
replied that County Staff has a proposal as part of the budgeting pro-
cess that addresses the use of alternative covers.
George Yarnados, representing Waste Management, Inc. of Florida,
(WMI) stated that it Is important for Collier County to choose a com-
pany that has experience in operating landfills in South Florida where
often the ground water is inches below the surface of the land. He
said that W~I is the only company with the necessary experience,
,oo 000 285
Page 42
May 10, 1994
resources, ability and financial wherewithal to provide a $10 million
environmental Impairment Insurance policy. He reviewed the members of
the Project Team that include Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., Rust
Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. and Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe
& Benton, P.A.
Jim O'Connor, President of Waste Management, Inc. of Florida,
stated that WMI is a subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc., which is a
subsidiary of WMX Technologies Company that Is the world's largest and
most experienced private provider of environmental services. He said
that they operate 132 landfills across the Country and have over 30
years of experience. He remarked on the financial strength of the
company. He said that six years ago, WMI purchased a landfill from
the County in the Springhill area of the panhandle. He stated that
his firm contracted with Duval County to operate a landfill facility.
He remarked that it is difficult to develop an RFP for these types of
facilities.
Warren Smith, Manager-Business Development for Waste Management,
Inc. of Florida, presented an organization chart that depicted who
would be involved in the Collier County landfill project. He stated
that employment would be offered to all qualified County employees.
Mr. Smith stated that all WMI landfills meet or exceed all
Federal and State regulations.
Mr. Smith stated that within a week after Hurricane Andrew, WMI
had 100 additional trucks and 200 additional people on the clean up
effort in Collier County.
Mr. Smith stated that optimization of the site is a key Issue In
Collier County. Using an aerial photograph, Mr. Smith described the
existing site. He suggested that by taking advantage of the northern
portion of the site by filling In the haul road, phasing the project,
filling Cell 6 and filling the completed landfill mined area would
extend the life of the existing site by 20 or 30 years.
Mr. Smith presented a computerized video to depict the conceptual
plan for the existing landfill site.
Page 43
May 10, 1994
Linda Long, Director of Public Affairs, stated that one of the
most Important parts of service to Collier County would be com-
~tntcattons and education outreach. She said that a communications
plan will be set up.
Mr. OtConnor stated that Waste Management, Inc. has the resources
of a large company with the responsiveness of a small company.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. O'Connor stated that the
projected final height for the landfill is 15§ feet, which would give
an extended life of 30+ years. He said that the landfill could stay
at 106 feet and still get 20+ years of additional life.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. O'Connor replied that the
RFQ was similar to the RFP that was previously developed.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Smith stated that WMI's
proposed method for optimization would be re-permitting the different
construction projects, Installing a liner end filling on the lined
areas.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. O'Connor confirmed that WMI
Is operating the landfill In Duval County at approximately $10.00 per
ton for the life of the site.
Commissioner Saunders asked how Collier County could reach the
recycling goals required by the State?
Mr. Smith replied that the International Process Systems
which is currenty betn~ used in West Palm Beach County, is a system
that takes yard trash and mixes it together with wastewater sludge to
create compost.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Smith stated that a
similar program could be established at the site. He said that the
current C & D operation could be moved into the area that is presently
used for yard waste which would permit the continuance of ongoing
operations and Installation of an IPS system.
At the conclusion of the presentations, Commissioner Constantine
stated that he te uncomfortable with Sanifil1 Recycling, Inc.
Commissioner Saunders and Commissioner Norris agreed.
Page 44
May 10, 1994
Commissioner Norris remarked that they have only been in business
since 1990 and have no facilities in Florida.
Commissioner Volpe also agreed.
Commissioner Constantine etated that the other firms have poten-
tial.
Commissioner Saunders stated that Chambers Waste Systems of
Florida, Inc. only proposal involved transporting waste out of the
County. He said that he did not agree to this proposal because the
landfill would still have to be maintained and if something were to
happen to the facility that it was be hauled to, it would have to be
landfilled here. He stated that the cost would be prohibitive. He
suggested that Chambers be eliminated also.
Commissioner Constantine stated that the costs cannot be assumed.
He said that as far as recycling is concerned, Chambers stated that
they would be willing to work with the Cou..ty.
Commissioner Volpe agreed with Commissioner Constantine. He
stated that the citizens may want to consider hauling. He said that
in terms of optimization all alternatives must be considered.
Commissioner Natthews stated that she was Initially unhappy with
the Chambers suggestion, but in the interest of listening to as many
alternatives as available she would like to hear more from Chambers
Waste Systems.
Commissioner Norris concurred.
¢om~issioner Norris moved to keep Addington ~nvironmental, Inc.,
Chambers ~ts $¥etem~ of Florida, Inc., ~d ~aste ~ge~nt, Inc. of
Flort~ in t~ ~ process.
In response to Co~tsstoner Saunders, Hr. Lorenz replied that the
firms will provide the County with a total cost and total capacity so
that comparisons c~ be made.
Co~issioner Sanders stated that when the Co~ty selects engi-
neers for complicated projects, the board meets with two or three
fir~ ~d then decides who they ~tll deal with. He suggested tha~
s~e concept for so~td waste.
Page 45
May 10, 1994
Commissioner Constantine agreed with the concept but said that
this Is not the appropriate time. He stated this is only a look at
qualifications, and after looking at specific proposals would be the
appropriate time to decide which firm is qualified.
Commissioner Norris stated that he would like to see another step.
He remarked that a stringent RFP will be counter productive. He
believes it should be left open to allow for proposals.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, County Manager Dotrill
replied that Staff has developed some assumptions that include uti-
lizing the area in between the existing cells and using a synthetic
daily cover. He said that by using these suggestions, Staff projects
that the current site capacity could be extended to the year 2015. He
confirmed that Staff is preparing some basis for comparison to priva-
tization.
Commissioner Matthews suggested that Staff make a proposal.
Commtuloner Norris moved that the Board of County Com-tsmtonerm
gather propouls on how the optimization will be accomplished from the
£ir~ of Addtng~on Knviromnt&l, Inc., Clare Waste Systems of
Florida, Inc. ~nd Waste Management, Inc. of Florida.
Commissioner Volpe asked if the motion includes a proposal from
Staff?
Commissioner Constantine stated that proposals will be gathered
and negotiations will begin at that point as opposed to bids.
Cotmty Manager Dotrill suggested that actual cost projections be
Included based on their assumptions. He said that reasonable assuran-
ces for their proposal in terms of environmental constraints must be
included. He stated that Staff estimate of cost will need to be
explained.
~lemioner Volpe seconded the ~otton on the floor.
Opo~ c~ll for the question, the motion carried 5/0.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lorenz stated that an RFP
will be ready in three weeks.
Commissioner Norris remarked that the RFP should be developed in a
Page 46
May 10, 1994
manner that allows the firms flexibility when submitting a plan of
action.
In response to Comm~ssioner Constantine, County Manager Derrill
indicated that the responses to the RFP will be brought to the Board
in 60 to 75 days from today.
see Co~iaaAoner Saundara moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
C~.'Tte~ 4/0 (Commissioner Matthews out), that the following items
under the consent agenda be approved and/or adopted: see
RESOLUTION 94-326 AUTHORIZING A 25~ DKFKRRAL OF ROAD, LIBRARY SYSTEM,
PAKI~ AID ~TIONAL FACILITIES, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SKRVICES SYSTEM,
AND B2XJCATXONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM IMPACT FEES FOR JOSE E. AND SOLEDAD
See Pages
Item e16A2 - Deleted
Item #16A3a
RESOLOTXON 94-327 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMKRY OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABA%'~II31T OF A P~BLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 21214-067,
OWEER OF Iq~CORD - ALFRED R. SANCHEZ ESTATE
See Pages 3/1~-- J//
lteI #16ASh
RESOLUTION 94-328 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATemeNT O~ A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30716-082
OMNKR OF RECORD - C S FUNDING ASSOCIATES
Itel ff16A3c
See Pages
RESOLUTION 94-329 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TEE COST OF THE
ABATIMKNT OF A POBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SKRVICKS CASE NO. 21112-082,
~ OF RECORD - JOHN ROY YOUNG
Item#16ASd
See Pages
E~SOLOTIOII 94-330 PROVXDXNG FOR ASSESSMKRT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATB~IT OF A POBLIC NUXSANCE COMPLIANCE SKRVICES CASE NO. 30817-029,
OILIER OF KI~ORD - CAROL A. WHITE
See Pages ...~/'7- ~2~' /~
Ite~#l~lkSe - Deleted
Xtem J16ASf
94-331 ~XDIRG ~R ASS~S~ OF LIHN FOR ~ COST OF ~g
~ A ~LXC ~IS~C. C~X~OE S~ICKS CASE NO. 30713-045,
290 ag.
OWKKROFRECORD - R K RIM~LTY OF FLORIDA, INC.
1994
Item#16&3g
RESOLUTION 94-332 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMKIFf OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF TH~
&B~TE)I~NT OF & PqTBLIC NUISANC~ COMPLIANCE s~rvIcEs CASE NO, 30713-044,
OMNKROFRBCOIqD - R K RKALTY OF FLORIDA, INC.
Iten#16A3h
KE~OL~TION 94-333 PROVIDINO FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABAT~3Ff OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30713-043,
~ OF I~ECORD - R K REALTY OF FLORIDA, INC.
Item #16A3t
~ESOLUTZON 94-334 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
A~qT~3~f OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30108-001,
~ OF HCORD - PAUL L. RIDDLEBERGER, JR.
See Pages -~O~-- 3 G~ ?
Item #16A3:J
mOLUTION 94-338 PROVIDING FOR ASSES~MEITT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATlI~31T 0P A ~XC ~XS~CK C~LI~CK SK~ICKS C~K M0. 21223-064,
See Pages
Item
R~OLUTION 94-336 ~IDIN~
~~ ~ A ~IC ~IS~ C~I~CE S~ICKS CASE NO. 30526-062,
It# #16131
RESOLUTION 94-337 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATemenT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30720-044,
O~EROF F~CORD - IRENE PARENT AND SUZANNE G~AHAM
Ite~ #16ASm
RESOLUTION 94-338 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF THE
ABATemenT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30625-005,
~ OF ~ - MART JOHNSON
Page 48
Hay 10, 1994
I~SOLOTZ~ 94-339 PROVIDING FOR &SSEssIq~T OF LINR FOR TH~ COST OF TH~
ABAT~M~Ff OF A I~TBLZC NUISANCE COMPLZANCK SERVICES CASE NO. 21124-015,
OWlSr~R OFK~CORD - B&RB&R& A. EANORY
R~SOLUTZON 94-340 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMK]F2' OF LIKR FOR THE COST OF
A.BATZMKIFF OY A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SKRVICES CASE NO, 30724-082,
~ OF J~'~3ED - ACHILLE FZLS & RUBY FILS
Item #16A3p
RY~OLUT/OII 94-341 PROVIDTHG FOR ASSKSSMX]FT OF LTKN FOR THE COST OF TEE
A~Ik~ OF A FOBLIC RUISANC-~ COMPLIANC~ S~RVIC~S CASE NO. 30712-210,
OWIIKR OF RECORD - ACHZLLK !~LS & ROBY FZLS
RZ~O~OTZON 94-342 PROV/DING FOR ASSES~ OF LIKR FOR TH~ COST OF T]~
AB&~ OF A FUBL:[C NU/SANCK CC:~[FT.,IANCle S~:I~.'VICKS CXS~e NO. 30803-046,
~ OF ~ - SEGUNDO FJLT.,LJtT
See Pages
Item ,16D1 - Deleted
Item,16D2
SATISFACTIOJ~ OF NOTICK OF PROMISE TO PAY ~ A~~ ~ ~
PA~ ~ ~ ~/0R S~ I~A~ ~S FOR SU~ ~ J~S
~, ~ ~ L~A ~L~N, ~IG ~SON HOL~, ROB~ ~ VI~I
~, ~ T. J~ON ~., J~S ~ CA~ LKG~, ~G~ ~
~ ~S, DZ~ LUCA, ~D~I~ L. ~ I~OSH, ~ D. ~,
S.e Pag.sJ.3 3
BID ~94-2189, 'TIRES, TUBE AND R~LAT~D S~RVlCES' - A~ARDED TO
VENDOIq~ AS DESCRIBED IN THE EXECUTIVE
M~y 10, 1994
JL~D !~'~IV~ & !~B&T~ CI~C~ ~ROM ]~L FOR & LIGHTING R~fROI~IT
I~D.-"I'~A~A~3~'~'II~]~ 'I'OMAI"~RHA~A~ CXP BO*IX]~ (~qTJID 325) - XN A
~ D~"'~.A~~OF $8,514
Iteu#16H1 - Deleted
Iteu#16H2 - Deleted
SUFPL~M~ITJtL ~ NO. 8 #ITH ~I~STMIRD CO~ING, INC. ~R
~I0~ ~ ~ I~~ RO~ B~ 111~/8~ ~
~ Z-75 (~ ~ ~0~ NO, 66041) - IN ~ ~ OF ~66,992.99
See Pages
Item ,16H4 - Deleted
Item,16H6
IIIT~I~,iL AGR~EIIT M/TH TH~ CI/~/ OF NAPLK$ FOR TI~ CORS'fRU~ION OF
M~F~MiT~fILZTZ~ 30IIITLYN/TH AIRPORT-PU~LING R0&D $IX-LMIING
~ (CIB NO. 039) B~I~EZ]I GOLD~R ~&T~ P&RL~&Y ARD PIN~ RIDGK
RO~D - ~TT TO P&Y TH~ COUNT~ ~493,035.48
See Pages
Item ,163
M/~I~Y,&~E~ COI~J~FORD~IC~
The following miscellaneous correspondence was flied and/or
referred as presented by the Board of County Commissioners:
Page 50
Nay ~0, 1994
CERT/F~GAT~ OF CONNECTION TO T]~ TAX ROLLS AS ~S~D ~ ~
1990 TAX ROLL
Nu~r Date
354 04/21/94
265/266
1991 TAX ROLL
1992 TAX ROLL
04/19/94-04/21/94
178 04/19/94
180 04/21/94
1993 TAX ROLL
185 04/19/94
187 04/21/94
1993 TARGZBLK PEI~ONAL PROP~RTY
1993-138/151
1993-154/157
EXTRA GAIN TIM~ FOR INMATE NO. 46657
04/21/94-05/03/94
05/05/94-05/06/94
ltn#16J3
SATXSFACTXON~ OF LXEN FOR S~RVXCKS OF TH~ PUBLIC DEFENDER
See Pages
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:30 P.M.
BO~D OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO BOARD(S) OF
GOVE~uI'NG
TIM~ANTJ~I~, CHAIRMAN
Page 51