Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/17/1992 RNaples, Florida, March 17, 1992 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and hav~ng conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe VICE-CHAIRMAN: Richard S. Shanahan ALSO PRESENT: (ARRIVED AT 9:15 A.M.) Burr L. Saunders Max A. Hasse, Jr. Patricia A. Goodnight Jim Giles, Clerk of Courts: John Yonkosky, FAnance Director; Debby Farrls, Annette Guevin and Kathy Meyers, Deputy Clerks; Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator; Jennifer Pike, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Brenda Wilson, Assistant Gounty Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator; James Reardon, EmergencY Services Administrator; Ken Baginski, Planning Services Administrator; Martha Skinner, Social Services Director; Dick Clark, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Mike McNees, Budget Director; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director; John Madajewski, Project Review Services Manager; Bob Blanchard, Growth Planning D~rector; Bob Mulhere, Planner; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sheriff's Office. Page I March 17, 1992 #1 - &,PPRO~ ~'1~ CHANGES Con/sstoner Shanahan moved, seconded by Comn/ss/oner Rases and c~/'r/ed 4/0 (Contsstoner Ooodntght not present}, that the agenda be approved w/th the changes detailed on the Agenda Change Sheet and w/th tho ~ddlttonm! wuO~estton that discussion on Items ~7(C) and #7(D) be coord/nated. Page 2 ~T AGENDA - APPROVED AND/OR A/)OPTED March 17, 1992 The ~otion for approval of the Consent Agenda ia noted under Item ,~16. MINUTES OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING OF 11/19/91 AND R~GULAR MEETING OF 11/26/91 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Comaislioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Co.missioner Haeee and carried 4/0 (Com~ieeloner Goo&night not present), to approve ae pre- lented the Minutes of the Board of County Couieetonere Regular i ~keetingm of 11/19/91 and 11/26/91. · ,f ~MPLOYE~ SERVICE ANARDS - PRESENTED Commissioner Saunders congratulated the following employees and presented them with Employee Service Awards: Richard R. Franklin, Facilities Management Jack W. Wampler, EMS - § years - l0 years BEACH PARKING AT SWALLOW AVENUE AND SOUTH COLLIER BLVD., MARCO ISLARD - STAFF TO REPORT 3/31/92 RE LEGAL ISSUES The following persons spoke to the issue of access to beach parking facilities on Marco Island: Jan Haduck, President of the Isles of Capri Civic Association (presented Petition with over 400 names) George Carse (presented written copy of verbal comments) Harry Cowin, President of Marco Island Civic Association Milton Leonard, Secretary of Marco Island Civic Association Maurtce D. Metcalf, Immediate Past President of Marco Island Civic Association Philip J. Gannon, representing Marco Association of Condominiums George F. Keller, President of Collier County Givic Federation Smith Thompson Charlotte Westman, representing LeaGue of Women Voters of Collier County Emily MaGgio Ken Hunt Larry Bastk ~t~ione~ S~unders ~ved, ascended by Conteelonar Shah&hah and Page 3 March 17, 1992 carried 5/0, to direct County Attorney Cuyler to report back in two w~ek~ on all legal issues associated with the conversion or deeding of the lot to the County instead of the Marco Island Civic Association as a public parking lot, requiring meeting with all affected parties and the ~v~loper in particular, and to insure there will be no problems with the reverter clause. · a.e Re~-eeeed: 10:35 A.M. - Reconvened: 10:&5 A.M. at which ti~e D~put'F Clerk Guevin replaced Deputy Clerk Farris e.e Xta,SA4 REPORT OF IMPACT FEE INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS PREPARED BY TH~ JOINT AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY AND TH~ CITY OF NAPLES - ACCEPTED AS CONCEPTUAL GUIDE Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, recalled both the Board of County Commissioners and the City of Naples assisted in the creation of an Affordable Housing Commission. He said as one of its first charges, that organization looked into the ql/sstion of impact fees and how they affect the affordable housing industry and development of affordable housing for Collier County. He asked the Board of County Commissioners to give Staff direction regarding preparation of codes and ordinances in order to implement the desired waiver or deferral of impact fees and other considerations as they affect affordable housing projects. He introduced Brian Webber, Chairman of the Affordable Housing Commission, stating he will give a presentation to the Board which was recently heard by the Naples City Council. Brian Webber, Chairman, Affordable Housing Commission, com- municated impact fees on affordable housing are a retroactive tax on ~.~. lower income units. He mentioned the disproportionate share of unit ':~ · development costs created by impact fees, which are the same for one bedroom units targeted to $300 per month rentals as those targeted to ,' $?00 per month rentals, needs to be addressed in the economics of pro- ducing affordable housing for the community. He said the most impor- tant recommendation of the Commission is that guidelines should be established via the public hearing process and incorporated as part Page 4 March 17, 1992 of all impact fee ordinances. He reported in this way, a developer targeting certain units for very low, low and moderate income families can follow the guidelines, plan and know what incentives are available in exchange for covenants to produce housing for certain income levels. He said another recommendation of the Commission is to per- petuate a source of affordable housing funds through a trust fund. For example, he said, if the lO-cent linkage or dock stamp fee at the State level is voted as legislation, monies can be dedicated from those collected at the County level to an affordable housing trust fund to offset the impact fee benefits being given to affordable housing. He indicated currently there are discrepancies in the defi- nition of affordable housing utilized by both the City of Naples and the Gounty. He said the definition should be identical so the develo- pers can follow through with a program. He remarked it is expected that the impact fee benefits wlll be granted on a unit by unit basis for the income level that the developer covenants to rent or sell the housing unit to. He explained if there is a blended project of market rate units combined with very low income units, only the very /ow income units will qualify for the impact fee benefits, and the deve- loper will be expected to pay the full impact fees for the other units. He informed the Commission recommends full exemption of impact fees for both rental and home ownership units targeted for very low income families, which are defined as a family of four with a combined income of less than $24,000 per year. He said half-exemption and half-deferral of impact fees, to be paid back by the developer or home owner, is recommended for /ow income families, those with incomes of less than $32,000 per year. He advised pay backs or deferrals should be structured as soft second mortgages subordinate to all the terms of the first mortgage financing. He stated for those families earning less than $38,000 per year, which are defined as moderate income fami- lies, the recommendation is half deferral of impact fees, with the other half to be paid as normal market rate units would be paid. In response to Gommissioner Hasse, Mr. Webber detailed what the Page 5 March 17, 1992 :rental unit and home ownership costs will be for very low, low and ,moderate income families. Commissioner Volpe communicated he is troubled with the require- ment under Housing and Urban Development that affordable housing be located within 10 miles or 20 minutes of the workplace, fle said that is a very difficult, if not impossible, criteria to meet in this com- mllnity, particularly with the cost of land west of C.R. 951. Mr. Webber advised in the rental market, sites are available on Radio Road and Davis Boulevard that would work on a per unit cost when married with the impact fee incentives. For home ownership housing, he said, product is being advertised for sale at $60,000. Commissioner Volpe inquired what the reaction was to this report from the City of Naples? Mr. Webber advised the City Council has embraced the report in concept, and is waiting to hear what issues are raised by the Board of Oounty Commissioners. He indicated it is the intention of the Affordable fiousing Commission to put together a blended report to address both the City and County's concerns, and return to both par- ties. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Webber said It would be helpful if the Board directs Staff to begin amending the impact fee ordinances regarding affordable housing credits. Bill Jones, a local contractor, agreed that there ts a need for affordable housing in Collier County. He stated he is concerned, however, that deleting Impact fees for developers constructing that t~pe of housing places the burden on the rest of the building industry. He suggested a more equitable solution is to share the cost through a tax on all citizens in the county. Commissioner Volpe remarked one possible solution is the linkage fee being considered which is a type of tax on commercial developers who are hiring the service based persons who will require this housing. He said critical elements of this Issue are the establish- ment of a housing trust fund and the linkage fee study. He asked Page 6 Hatch 17, 1992 ~for an update on the status of that study. Mr. Brutt explained the study is comprised of three parts, one of ,~ which is the legal Justification that has been completed by Mr. Merrill. He said the County Attorney's Office must now draft the ',. actual ordinance. He indicated the middle part is the substantiation .of the documentation of the Jabot rates which is the amount of wages earned by what percentage of the population in the community. He said Staff is waiting for information from the U.S. Census Bureau to ~lete that portion of the study. Commissioner Volpe communicated that in his opinion, the Board must move forward with the guidelines, but until an affordable housing trust fund is established, there is no source of waiving or deferring impact fees. Mr. Webber pointed out that the doc stamp program should be in ~' place this year. He said it is prudent for Collier County to establish guidelines now to implement that program, so that 1992 is not wasted. He reminded the Board there are 1992 tax credits allo- cated to three projects in Collier County with the potential of another one or two. He said the programs can be started for develop- ment now. He also pointed out that to the extent the Board is helping '" a project up front with impact fee waivers, a valuable piece of real :' estate is being created that will add to the ad valorem tax base of the community, as opposed to remaining raw land. Craig Sherman, representing C&S Bank, offered their support for whatever the Board can do to assist affordable housing in the com- munity. He said the waiver of impact fees will increase the dollar amount the lender can lend or increase the amount of units that a cer- tain loan amount would be able to finance. Commissioner Volpe asked if the banking community supports deferral of impact fees? Mr. Sherman indicated they would support that proposal, however, i'';. that does not accomplish what the lender or developer is looking for, which is to increase the number of units or the loan amount. He said Page 7 March 17, 1992 the bank would look at the deferral of impact fees as a soft second mortgage loan and a drain on cash flow. Commissioner Saunders questioned if the fees to be gained from the doc stamp program would be allowed to be targeted to only one speci- fic category of affordable housing, such as the very low income cate- gory? Greg Mthalic, Affordable Housing Director, responded he is not sure that would be allowed, but will lock into the possibility. He mentioned that utilizing the doc stamp funds for only the very low income would only assist in rental housing, because those families in the very iow income category would not be able to afford owning a home. He said he will also investigate whether initiating programs for only the very low income category will result in non-compliance with Collier County's Comprehensive Plan. Gommissioner Saunders suggested the Board focus on assisting fami- lies with a combined income of less than $24,000, which is the very lOW income category. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Mihalic stated the 1990 Census as well as school information will help identify the numbers of people who fall into all categories. Mr. Webber asked the Board not to loose sight of the fact that only when blended with units in the very low income category does the Affordable Housing Commission propose benefits for low and moderate income families. He said it may take some of the more beneficial eco- nomics of moderate income units to put additional very low income units in the marketplace. Commissioner Saunders indicated he can support that Justification as long as the real emphasis is on the very low income category. Fred Thomas reminded the Board this is not the final report from the Affordable Housing Commission. He said they will, on an ongoing basis, be looking at many ways to support and enhance development of affordable housing. He said the first assignment to them by the City and County was to look into impact fees, which will be followed by Page 8 'investigating various funding mechanisms. March 17, 1992 He emphasized the guideli- for impact fee waivers need to be established first. Ken Hunt commented that targeting funds towards only a certain income category will preclude more than it should, those people seeking ownership. He said waiving of impact fees, and letting those impact fees be used as a down payment, goes a long way towards giving people the American dream. Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Couissioner Saundere and '.. carried unani~ously, to accept the report of impact fee incentives for affordable hou~ing developments and use it as a conceptual guide to dtr~ Staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions, ordinances and dev~l~ ~om~ended funding sources to implement the report; Staff to report back on the question of using the doc stamp program to focus only on very low income housing and whether that will result in non- oo~pll~noe with the Growth Management Plan. Commissioner Volpe asked that the guidelines be developed for deferrals as well as waivers of impact fees. He also asked that they ' allow some flexibility on the part of the Board of County Commissioners regarding the criteria and how they are interpreted. Page 9 March 17, 1992 I~OLUTION 92-173 RE REQUEST BY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR ~~ ~ ISS~ I~US~I~ D~LO~ ~~ BO~S TO ~ ~ O~~I~ ~S ~ ~OVIDE ~S FOR RENOVATION ~ I~RO~S TO - ~ ~U~ AT N~LES PROJECT - ADOPTED Attorney Donald Plckworth explained the Wlllough has become very successful and is noted for the treatment of eating disorders. He said they are requesting to refund certain outstanding high interest bonds and to provide new monies for renovation and upgrading of their facilities to include additional group therapy and administrative space. He reported the Industrial Development Authority approved this project after holding a public heartng, however, further approval of the Board of County Commlsstoners is also necessary. He noted this Is strictly project financing, and no monies of either the Authority or the County are being pledged. Commissioner Volpe mentioned Collier County advanced $2,000 to pay for the audit of the Industrial Development Authority. Attorney Pickworth advised they intend to reimburse the County for the advanced funds. County Attorney Cuyler advised that he has reviewed and approved the resolution which gives no approval of any zoning consideration and there ts no liability on the p~rt of the Board of County Commissioners ~ursuant to the resolution. Com~/seloner Shanahan moved, seconded by Co~missioner Goodnight ·nd =~rrted 4/0 (Commissioner Saunders out), to adopt Resolution .92-1T3 &ppr~vtng the Issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds ~med on the commitment of the Industrial Development Authority to r~ ~ mudtt costs and that there is no zoning implication or In response to Commissioner Volpe, Attorney Pickworth agreed that ~the Industrial Development Authority will address a letter to him as '~' Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, memorializing the com- -mitment made concerning the audit. Page 10 March ~?, 1992 INT]~I~PR~TATION UPHELD OF THE GROWTH MANAG~NT PLA~ REGARDING ~ ~TION OF ~SID~I~ DKNSI~ ~IN ~E ~ ACTIVI~ CK~KR AT ~ I~ECTION OF AI~ORT ROAD ~ V~ERBILT B~CH ROAD ~ ~ DI~D TO ~ WI~ APPELLA~ RECEDING P~TIAL DEVBLO~ OF ~0~ Bob Blanchard, Growth Planning Director, presented an appeal of the Growth Management Plan interpretation issued in December, 1991, l"egarding how residential density is calculated for property located within the Future Activity Center located at the intersection of Vanderbllt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road. He recalled the appeal was originally heard by the Board of County Commissioners on January 21st, at which time it was continued for 30 days to provide an opportunity for the appellant to meet with Staff in an attempt to accomplish their desired density within the Plan interpretation. He informed an agreement was not reached, requiring this item to be heard again by the Board. He explained the Growth Planning Department's interpretation is that this area is not yet an Activity Center and specific language in the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states it will become an Activity Center upon the completion of Vanderbilt Beach Road from C.R. 951 to U.S. 41, which is not likely to be completed until Fiscal Year 1993/1994. Until that time, he said, the uses and inten- sities of development which are typically reserved for Activity Centers are not appropriate. He indicated the interpretation says that commercial uses are not currently permitted at this location %lnless they meet the requirements for PUD Commercial in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and that residential densities are calculated by applying the density rating system except for those provisions &llowtng higher denstt~es either within Activity Centers or within · close proximity to Activity Centers. When the Activity Center actually becomes a reality, he said, these provisions will provide for a density of up to 16 units per acre, to be applied for at the time of rezontng, He remarked this is a simple issue, regarding whether or not development will be allowed that Is Inconsistent with the Growth Page ;'?'= March 17, 1992 Plan. He concluded it is his recommendation that the Board ~'of County Commissioners uphold the Growth Management Plan interpreta- ~'tion aa presented. Ce~iamioner Saundera returned to the meeting at this il~ ''~ Attorney Patrick Meals, representing the appellant, contended that permission of a rezone to residential use is permitted under the GMP and would be consistent with the Plan. He referred to page LU-1-36 of the GMP, indicating the language states specifically that the inter- section of Airport-Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road is designated as a Future Activity Center, and that upon completion of the road from C.R. 951 to U.S. 41, the intersection shall automati- cally become an Activity Center, and at that time become eligible for commercial zoning requests. He noted At is silent as to the issue of ~.~ residential zoning requests. He advised it As has interpretation !J' that° being it is silent, the GMP permits by exception the application for residential zoning requests during the interim period of time. He mentioned the appellant at this time is only requesting 12 units per acre as opposed to 16 units per acre plus density rating bonus cre- dits, which will be the full density available once the area is an Activity Center. Commissioner Volpe communicated until the completion of the road- way as described, the area is not an Activity Center. He said the "appellant is allowed to develop the property as residential, but the Board cannot allow density bonus credits until the area is actually an £ · i.'-. Activity Center. .. Attorney Neale pointed out the parcel consists of 10.18 acres, :which will be less 30 feet along one side, once Vanderbilt Beach Road ~. As completed. He indicated the parcel will then be less than l0 acres. He said in the discussions with Staff, the problem of flexibi- '~' lit¥ in interpretation has come up, because the parcel could be treated as infill property under the Growth Management Plan if it were . ~0 acres or less. He mentioned his client is agreeable to developing '~ Six units per acre until Vanderbllt Beach Road is completed, and then Page 12 March 17, 1992 forward with the remaining six units. He asked the Board to con- i'aider directing Staff to work with his client regarding that scenario. In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Blanchard stated even though the GMP is silent with regard to residential development it is very c/ear by its reference to a Future Activity Center, that add/- ttonal density credits are not given until the roadway is completed. He said with regard to six units per acre, Planning Services Staff does not round off when dealing with calculations of density. He ii~"iI remarked unless it is the Board's desire to allow that to occur, 10.18 '.~ acres is too much for residential inflll in the strict reading of the Growth Management Plan. In response to Commissioner Volpe, County Attorney Cuyler con- cuffed with Mr. Blanchard's interpretation that what the appellant is ~ requesting accrues from the Activity Center designation, which does .not exist at this point. ;' Bettte Gulacsik, representing the Collier County League of Women ;. Voters, stated it is the League's position to support and encourage i. adherence to all elements within the Growth Management Plan. She asked the Board to uphold Staff's interpretation. ~tutoner Hasse loved, seconded by Couissioner Goodn~ght and ~"C~ZTt~ ~~ly, to uphold Staff,s interpretation of the Growth It was the consensus to direct Staff to work with the Pet~tioner g an opportunity to develop the property at six units per acre. Maurice Metcalf, immediate past President of the Marco Island Civic Association (MICA), referred to a map of Marco Island and called 'attention to a small area with peculiar configurations. He said it is a relatively medium density area with fairly expensive land p~ices. Page 13 March 17, 1992 .He;.lndlcated there are still approximately 4,300 residential lots to ~be built on Marco Island and future retirees have purchased on the basis of plans drawn up over the years. He mentioned Marco Island has changed from primarily a retirement area Into a resort area as well. He pointed out other areas of Collier County are somewhat comparable, ~i.'and the ULDC addresses the genera/ needs of Collier County. He "remarked the economic base of Collier County can be protected by deve- loping a zoning overlay for the peculiar areas so builders know what they can do and purchasers know what is protected by ordinance. He stated MICA has worked for a number of years with builders and 'realtors on this subject. He requested the Board of County Commissioners authorize Staff to work with them to protect and Improve the economic base and the socio-economtc positions of these peculiar areas of Collier County. Commissioner Hasse questioned what Impact a zone overlay would have on the surrounding areas or portions of Marco Island? Frar~k Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, stated the difficulty is there will be various regulations for pieces of land which are under the same zoning category. He said this will Increase the amount of complexities for the development community and greatly increase the burden of Staff. He indicated he cannot comment on the benefits to the overall County community, because he has not been approached by anyone stating the zoning ordinances are not being carried out the way they were adopted. He said if one overlay district is created, Inevitably someone else will want one. He ~atd if that happens, the burden on Staff is extreme and there are no bene- fits to the community. '~';..In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Metcalf explained as an ,le, that the County's zoning ordinances address rear yard Setbacks as do the deed restrictions on Marco Island; however, when looking at the exceptions that may be given throughout the County, the 25-foot rear yard setback may be reduced to 10 feet. He said there Page 14 March 17, 1992 'are only slight inconsistencies between the County's ULDC and the deed restrictions on Marco Island, but the exceptions being given County- wide are totally inappropriate to Marco Island. Coati.toner Shanahan moved, seconded by Co~tsstoner Saundsrs and c~zTAod un~nimonsl¥, to direct Staff to meet with MICA as well as the h. xildex~ ~nd realtors for Marco Island to study the issues and deter- '. mine tbs ambiguities tn the UL~, ~d re~rn to the ~ard w/th recom- Xt~ ~7C ROBR3FT D~ANK OF HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC., REGARDING THE VAJFDB~BILT B~A~H MARINA - STAFF DIRECTED TO REVIEW C-3 ZONING AS IT RELATES TO MARINAS FOR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN ULD~ AMENDMENTS Robert Duane with Hole, Montes & Associates, stated his client, the Vanderbtlt Beach Marina, has been developed for more than 20 years. He said recently, however, when the Land Development Code was amended, marinas were deleted as a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district. He Indicated this poses a hardship for his client if the marina is damaged, because they cannot rebuild. He added they also ~' cannot expand. He pointed out the Comprehensive Plan very clearly ~ encourages presently developed sites for marinas to continue as loca- tions for water dependent and water related uses. He requested the ! ..Board direct Staff to reevaluate this issue and bring it back in revt- ~iy:ztons being proposed to the ULDC. ~.~ Commissioner Volpe asked whether deletion of marinas in the C-3 i~' zoning districts was a conscious decision or an oversight? Ken Baglnskl, Planning Services Manager, clarified that uses J% allowed under the CRC district that were in existence and permitted at the time of adoption of the 1982 Code, were considered permitted uses. He said marinas were not specifically designated as a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district, and subsequently were deleted from the ULDC. ~" He indicated his belief that the deletion was a conscious effort, because marinas were identified as a permitted use within the C-4 d/strict. 32 Page 15 March 17, 1992 Mr. Duane communicated there are at least five marinas that will be very significantly affected by this change in the Code. Mr. Baginskl mentioned he has spoken with both Mr. Duane and Attorney Anthony Pires on this subject. He agreed to look at alter- natives, such as whether marinas should be considered a permitted use, / ~ utilize old language, or possibly consider them as a conditional use, and bring those alternatives back under the upcoming ULDC amendments. Mr. Duane indicated he would be satisfied with that consideration It was the consensus to direct Staff to review C-3 zoning as it relates to marinas for possible inclusion in the ULDC amendments. ~:'~ Gathy Henke, representing Vanderbilt Beach Marina, stated they ~ntend to expand the marina's restaurant. She explained restaurants are permitted tn C-3 zoning, but the expansion cannot occur because , the restaurant is within a marina. She asked if that will also be :j' taken into consideration? Commissioner Volpe communicated Staff will be looking into whether or not to allow marinas within the C-3 zoning district. He said spe- cific pieces of property are not being reviewed in this context. He encouraged Ms. Henke to bring her concerns to the attention of Staff ~.?before this subject is brought back to the Board. i', A]F/I~ONT PII~ES OF WOOD%A~RD, PIRES & ~ERSON ~G~ING MISFITS ~INA - ,: ~T~ DI~ TO ~I~ C-3 ZONING AS IT RE~TES TO ~IN~ FOR ~~ ~USION IN ~ This item was heard in conjunction with Item #7C. Attorney Anthony Pires, representing Misfits Marina, indicated his &greement with the consideration mentioned above by Mr. Baginski. It was the consensus to direct Staff to review C-3 zoning as it relates to marinas within the C-3 zoning district. $$'Receooed 12:30 P.M. - Reconvened 12:47 P.M. at which time De~m~F Clark Me~ers raplaced Deity Clerk ~evtn · X~ ~ ~ OF LI~ ~SOL~ION NO. 92-32. O~RS OF ~CO~ - ROBERT BI~ ~ C~LE BIGELOW - WI~~ Commissioner Volpe reported that this item has been resolved and therefore is being withdrawn. OO.O,A 33' Page ! 6 March l?, 1992 I~N~L~TION 92-Z74 RE PETITION NO. PU-90-1, MR. THOMAS B. HART OF H~ & I~NOTT, REI~R~SENTIN(] COLLE(]E PROPERTIES OF SOU'I~/iW~ST FL, INC., I~t;ESTING AN EXTENSION OF PROVISIONAL USE 90-! FOR PROPERTY LOCAT~I~ 3.5 MILES EAST OF CR 95! AND .25 MILES NORTH OF SABLE PALM Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, related that he had presented this issue to the Board on February 25, 1992, whereby the issue arose by Mr. Yonkosky of $37,292. Mr. Brutt spe- c~fied that both Mr. Archibald and the County Attorney's Office recom- mend approval of this petition. Ram~ro Manallch, Assistant County Attorney, reviewed that Mr. Yonkosky had correctly pointed out that Sea Con Industries, the former operator of the subject excavation pit, had incurred the $37,292 debt. !.He added that Mr. Hart, an attorney w~th Humphrey & Knott representing College Properties of Southwest Florida, Inc., has provided him with a letter in which his client has agreed to pay this debt and will do so on or before December 9, 1992. Mr. Manalich further noted that College Properties has provided the County with a $100,000 letter of credit as assurance of proper comp/etlon of the project, and the County would be able to collect any unpaid debt from the letter of credit if the amount was not paid on or before December 9, 1992. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Manalich verified that this ~ayment will include interest. Commissioner ~asse questioned the involvement of Sable Palm Road ~n the issue, and indicated that he has received several phone calls from residents concerned about people trespassing. Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Pro~ects Management Director, explained that Sable Palm Roadway is an MSTU Pro3ect that is currently be~n~ worked on and is in the final stages of design and permitting, and added that several authorities - i.e. Army Corp. of Engineers, DNR and DER have been performing field walks. He verified that they should not have gone onto private property except within the easement mrea, and pointed out that they are trying to identify all the Page 17 March 17, 1992 structures. Cc~aa~i~oner Shanahan ~oved, eeconded by Cou~emtoner Saunderm and =arr~e~ unanimously, to approve the petition con~letent with the .Pal~a~nt by Decnber 9, 1992 of $37,292, thereby adopting Resolution '. 92-2T4. ~ 000.~ 35 Page 18 March 17, 1992 FJJOZ,~'ZOI 92-175 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF T~%~DS BY GIFT, · FI~CIEA~I OR COID~lqATION, WHICH ~ ~QUZ~D FOR ~ CONS~UCTZON OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~STCLOX ST~ET ~ENS~ONS IN Z~O~EE, ~ORZDA - Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that · : this Item deals with the Westclox Street Project In Immokalee, and the acquisition of right-of-way to be able to allow the project to ~,, proceed. He confirmed that currently the design and most of the water management permitting Is complete. Mr. Archibald noted that this resolution has been prepared to i allow the staff to proceed with the acquisition of a parcel of pro- :' perry at the Intersection of the proposed Westclox Street (S.R. 29) and Newmarket Road. He further noted that the resolution authorizes the staff to proceed with negotiations, either through purchase or ,. gift or condemnation. He pointed out that within the resolution is an exhibit that outlines clearly the parcel in question, and this is ~.~. because it is a critically needed piece of property. Mr. Archibald stated that this parcel ts a little more than 9,000 sqalare feet, and located at the intersection of S.R. 29 and Newmarket ; Street. He related that the problems associated with this parcel are the impacts on the adjacent land, the land use and the value of the Mr. Archibald summarized that the project itself ts important because the construction of Westclox Street will provide an alternate route between Carson Road and S.R. 29. He noted for the record that i part of the staff's study and design has properly addressed the safety and public welfare issues, as well as long term planning, environmen- tal issues and the economic aspects of the roadway deslgn in preparing .:..'the plans and specifications. Mr. Archibald concluded that staff ts recommending adoption of the resolution subject to the following minor verbiage changes to be ~lndertaken by the County Attorney's office and duly included and noted tn the resolution: Page 1 9 March 17, 1992 1. refer to fee simple interest and not easement interest; 2. note that there are no mobile homes on the property. Co~eLisl~oner Goodn~ght moved, seconded b~ Co~m~ee~oner Haese and c~ed unanimously, to adopt Reeolut~on 92-175 with the ch~ngee. Page 20 March 17, lgg2 ~OT~TZON~ FOR A CONTRACT AMENI~ENT WITH SMALLY, WELLFORD AND NALVEN FOR ADDITIONAL ~VIRON~q~TAL SERVICES TO FINALIZE PERNZTTZNG REQUZIt~M~T~ FOR ~STCLOX ROAD, CIE PR03~CT NO. 026 - APPROVED Transportation Services Administrator Archibald noted that this item also involves the Westclox Road project and its environmental habitat. He recalled that under the design contract with Smally, Wellford and Nalven they completed all the permitting that had to do with the water management issues for construction of the roadway, except for any and all habitat studies. He pointed out that habitat concerns change over time and they want to wait until they are fairly close to construction, before they address this. He reported that gopher tortoises have been found within the right-of-way area. Mr. Archibald suggested that an environmental habitat survey should be completed to meet the requirements of Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He pointed out that permits would have to be obtained tn order to re/o- cate the gopher tortoises, and that the activities as well as the possible costs are outlined within the Executive Summary. Mr. Archibald summarized that staff, in this item, is requesting board approval to negotiate with the consultants, Sma11¥, Wellford and Nalven to undertake an initial environmental habitat survey as well as proceed with contract fee negotiations for a supplemental agreement for additional services. He indicated that the supplemental agreement would be brought back to the Board, along with the mitigation options that would have to be considered. Commissioner Volpe questioned whether the County has recently engaged the services of outside consultants to do some environmental permitting because staff does not have the time or the expertise, and why the consultants could not be used for this rather than supple- menting the contract. In response, Mr. Archibald explained that the contract that Commissioner Volpe was referring to ts a Master Consulting Service Page 2 ! March 17, 1992 Contract° and it would require the preparation and negotiation of a scope and task assignment, and presentation of it to the Board. He stated that what has been recommended in the past is that the con- sultant or his subconsultants that have originally designed the pro- Ject and know the most about it undertake the work more efficiently · l~d with the least cost. He perceived that staff's recommendation of negotiating a supplemental agreement with a firm that has been onsite would be the most expedient and the least costly. Commissioner Volpe questioned whether existing staff or the Conservancy could be help to relocate the gopher tortoises, and offset costs. Mr. Archibald responded that if it tea relocation assignment, and site work is to be performed then staff could participate and the cost would be reduced, but that the consultant would still be needed to provide the recommendations and guidelines for the work. He discussed that the staff was involved in a similar project at Lely Barefoot Beach ·nd performed most of the site work, with the assistance of the Conservancy. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald confirmed that staff is, with this item, requesting authorization from the Board to proceed with negotiations, and that the Executive Summary outlines what costs can be expected. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald advised that the Finance Department typically prohibits him from entering Into any contract until the time that the funding issues are addressed. ~esi~ner Goodnight ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hmmee0 and ¢~t~ ~i~u~l¥, to approve authorization of the Transportation k~vtc~e Division to negotiate · contract amendment with Snlly, kllfo~d ~nd ~·lven on the project. UPDAT~ F.~kRDING AN ALLIGATOR ALLEY ROUTE 29 EMERGENCY P~SPONSE FACILITY - STAFF DIRECTED TO CONTINUE THIS REPORT AND JUSTIFY THE NEED FOR THIS FACILITY AND TO PURSUE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 000. 56 Page 22 March 17, 1992 Jay Reardon with Emergency Services, updated the Board on the pro~rees of his division concerning the establishment of an Emergency Services Facility for Alligator Alley. He related the following accompl ishment s: ~"~':l) received a letter from the State Department of Natural Resources concurring their willingness to negotiate a land lease at a minimal cost in the Southwest quadrant of Route 29 and Alligator Alley~ 2} received an awarded grant from the State for one-half the price of m rescue first response vehicle with transport capabilities~ 3} commitment from Cellular One to work with the County and offset the construction costs, should the County allow them to co-locate a tower on the site. He expressed that he needs the Board's direction to proceed toward other sources, which would be the federal government, and possibly other private firms. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Reardon detailed that the vehicle will have dual capabilities - fire protection, fire suppression, as well as paramedical treatment and patient transport. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Reardon reported that this intersection is approximately 25 miles from the first toll plaza. Commissioner Saunders pointed out that Broward County has never built a facility of this type to the west of their toll plaza in Broward County, and yet the population size is comparatively greater than Collier County. He said if this structure is built at this time, it would have limited value. Mr. Reardon expressed that the facility would not only serve the Alley, but also areas north and south on S.R. 29. He recalled that the impact fee ordinance identifies primary and secondary response zones, and added that they are not meeting their time response requirements in the secondary time zones. He mentioned that when 1-75 is completely four-laned, traffic is expected to increase seven fold and therefore accidents will increase. Commissioner Volpe agreed with Commissioner Saunders' viewpoint 000 57 Page 23 March 17, 1992 ~Xld added that the best way to serve these areas is by helicopter. He 'said that this type of facility would be better utilized in East Naples, North Naples or Immokalee. Commissioner Saunders stated that he would encourage, when future ex~ansion programs are evaluated throughout the County, to establish to the Board's satisfaction that there is a need for an Emergency Service Facility anywhere in the County. He clarified that he wants to see support service facilities where they are needed and added that Mr. Reardon has not provided Justification for this particular loca- tion. .~..' Commissioner Hasse questioned if the phones along Alligator Alley in this area are in operation, to which Mr. Reardon stated he is not ~certain. Commissioner Shanahan expressed that he would also l~ke to see the 'need for this facility Justified. He said that Mr. Reardon should continue to pursue action and bring it before the Board again with .~ustification to proceed. ~..~ In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Reardon verified that a g~.ant has been received towards the replacement of the existing heli- copter. ~/mtone~ S~undere ~oved, aeconded by Co,missioner Sh~ ~d ~i~ 4/1, (C~ie=ioner Vol~ o~.ed) to direct Staff to continue this ~rt ~ ~rther reeearch the need for a facilAt~ in thie loca- tA~ te ~e additional ree~rces. ~,~~XON OF ~~ ~S ~R ~ I~O~EE ~G~ C~ CLINIC ~ ,*~ ~~RTATION ~~ - CO~I~ED TO ~CH 24, 1992 Jay Reardon, with the Emergency Services Division, reviewed that / th~s item concerns the Immokalee Walk-In Clinic and Shuttle Program. He recalled that the Board approved this service for a twenty-four period and that funding will run out on April l, 1992. !t. Mr. Reardon informed the Board that County Manager Dorrill met ~th representatives from Naples Community Hospital and advised Mr. 58' Page 24 March 17, 1992 Reardon that the Hospital feels they would succeed in a long term solution. He briefed the Board that service has been in place for approximately twenty-four months and has serviced 7,630 patients the Clinic, and 948 individuals were shuttled to Naples Community .Hospital for greater treatment capability than the Clinic could pro- He finalized that this request is for the Board to consider moving '$150,000 from the general fund reserves into this program for the remaining six months of the Budget Year. Commissioner Volpe expressed that he would like to have an update from County Manager Dorrill on the discussions that he has attended, and the likelihood of a long term solution. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ochs, sitting in for County Manager Dorrill, expressed that he has no information on this matter. John MadaJewskt, Project Review Services Manager, Indicated that his office has been working with Commissioner Goodnight, and with the · Naples Community Hospital, Collier Enterprises, state and federal wildlife agencies, and have held numerous meetings. He outlined the following: a) a preliminary site development plan has been approved for a seven acre tract of the Heritage PUD property, which has been deeded to the Hospital; b) the Hospital ts working with Collier Health Services as the funder, with Collier Health Services renting a completed facility to replace the current one; c) the County has offered to the Hospital and their group the ability to simultaneously review final site plan and building permits for the facility, so that once they get the development review approval process to a point where State and Federal per- mits are issued, they can tackle the gopher tortoise and scrub Jay habitats, that are causing some delay. He explained that this is a similar situation to the Westclox Road Project pre- sented by Mr. Archibald. Om~ai~i~ner Shanahan ~ovmd, seconded by Co~atsatonmr Hasse and o~x~i~~i~o~sly, to continue this Item one week to enable County ~ D~rrill to rslmrt to the Board on lt. ~AX~MAN TO ~X~CUT~ LETTER INDICATING COLLIER COUNTY'S OPPOSXTION TO A ~ E]~EN~ION OF BOAT DOCKS A~SOCIATED WITH THE ISLAND MARINA. INC.,/M~RX~A BAY CLUB OF NA~LK$, INC. - APPROV~D Page 25 March 17, 1992 Tom Conrecode, Director of Office of Capital Projects Management, reported that this Item is a recommendation that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the letter indicating the County's opposition to the proposed extension of boat docks associated with Island Marina and Marina Bay Club. Emily Maggio expressed her concern over the original granting of the provisional use, as it provided a loophole which allowed the deve- loper to have a marina of this size. Since that time she stated, the Marina Bay Club advertises that they can accommodate boats up to 80 feet An length w~th a total of 80 boat sl~ps. Frank Becket complimented the Board on the depth of their knowledge. He presented signed petitions asking the Board to oppose ~ ,the expansion of the Island Marina. He cited that he is an expert on kayaks. ~.o~lnton~r Shmnmhmn ~ved, seconded ~ Co~s~oner Sanders ~d C~t~ ~imly, to authorize the Chair~ to exeate said letter. Page 26 March 17, 1992 BETWeeN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND COAST CORPORATION TO REIMBURSE COLLIER COUNTY FOR COSTS A~O~IATEDNXTH ANALYZING ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE LARGE SCALE I~FRASTRUCTURE - APPROVED Tom Conrecode, Director of the Office of Capital Projects Management, stated that the Board of County Commissioners granted approval for Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. to provide an analysis for Coast Communities Corporation, and Nabors, Giblin declined, choosing not to provide this without the unanimous approval of the Board. Mr. Conrecode related that this item is an Agreement for Reimbursement to which Coast Communities Corporation has agreed to reimburse the County for the engagement of Nabors, Giblin and that staff is recommending that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute this Agreement. Ce~ANioner Saundere moved, seconded by Coniseloner Haasa and carried ~nani~ou~l¥, to approve the Agreement for Reimburee~ent and ~lltho~e the Chairman to execute said Agreement. H&rch 17, 1992 92-176 APPOINTING R. DENNIS CHAMBERS, ROBERT CLAUSSEN, T,&~GENT, JAY MORGAN, DONALD STAUDTER AS MEMBERS OF TNE COUNTY I~ROD~CTIVITY COMMITTEE AND RICHARD RIEHM AS ALTERNATE - Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant, reviewed that this item ts to appoint five members to serve two year terms and one alternate member to fill a vacancy due to a resignation. She verified that a press release was issued and twenty-four applications were received, of which all were eligible. She stated that a memorandum was received from the Chairman of the Productivity Committee and recommended R. Dennis Chambers, Robert Claussen, Arthur Largent, Jay Morgan and Donald Staudter for two year terms to expire February 4, 1994, and R~chard Riehm as the Alternate to expire February 4, 1993. ~tutoner H&sse moved, seconded by Comtseloner Ooodntght and CmZTt~ ~tmOU~l¥, tO mppolnt the above-referenced individuals to th~e Px'~gttvlt~ Commlttee, thereby adopting Resolution 92-176. Page 28 Sue Fllson, Administrative Assistant, announced that this item is to appoint two members to serve three year terms on the Code Enforcement Board, for the expiration of terms for Monte Lazarus and Jackie Williams. She confirmed that a press release was issued, and received thirteen resumes. She concluded that staff recommends the reappotntment of Monte Lazarus and the appointment of Lionel G. ~L'Esperance. C~:~oner 8h~a&haa, seconded by Co--tss~oner H&sse and carried ~~IF, to rea~tnt Monte L~a~s ~d ap~lnt Lionel L'~ to the Code Enforcement ~mrd, there~ adopting R~olntion 92-177. Sue Ftlso~ ue~t~te~ ~o~ Co~tss~one= Uolpe that the Coutosto~er Sba~a~a~ exp~eose~ t~a~ Ho~te ~aza=us bas 78 Page 29 March 17, 1992 ~ -- Llk~R3f BATIK DIRgCT~D TO ~ PAY~TqT OF $53,489.8? .-~ ~ F~i~f-~ DAn ~[D PROVIDE A SET OF PI.~NS TO STAYF WITHIN Larry Bastk requested that the Board grant an extension of the SMP recfutrement for thirty days for his project. He discussed that he needed a little more time to attend to the comments made by the staff, after he had submitted Phase I and Phase II plats. Commissioner Shanahan questioned Mr. Basik if he was in a position to address the remaining sixteen comment items. Mr. Baslk responded affirmatively, but only if granted the extension. Mr. Basik clarified that he was requesting thirty days because not only do the staff comments need to be addressed, but staff must still also review Phase II. John MadaJewskt, Project Review Services Manager, refuted Mr. Basik's comments that he was in ignorance of the deadlines within his time period. He presented to the Board that every word, comment and phone call has been logged, because it was suggested that his office had not been doing business properly, and that this log verifies that Mr. Basik has been advised long ago of the deadline and cutoff dates. Mr. MadaJewski related that after finally receiving a submission on February 27, 1992 at 4:40 p.m., his staff, along with the County Attorney's office and the County Surveyor dropped al/ their business and reviewed this project in two days. He recalled that he personally hand-walked the submissions. Mr. MadaJewskt pointed out that there are still twenty-three out of the 4? comments that were deficiencies back tn June, 1991 that were ertl] deficient when they were reviewed a second time, and added that these items that are before the Board are new items; it was not that they were overlooked on the first review. Regarding the first review, he noted that the plat was not sufficient, and the County Surveyor returned It as unrevtewable, and added that there are also items based 78 Page 30 March 17, 1992 on the adoption of the land development code that must be in compliance. In summary, Mr. MadaJewski concluded that staff has bent over backwards to assist Mr. Basik. John Yonkosky, Finance Director, verified that the cumulative amount that is due to Collier County is $53,489.87. In response to Commissioner Volpe concerning bonding requirements, Nr. NadaJewski related that the bonding requirements have not been met and that in the first submission reviewed, there was no letter of intent as to whether he was going to bond the project and record the plat, or lease it unbonded and proceed with the work. Mr. MadaJewski recalled that part of the Board's discussion in December, lgg! dealt with the issue that the applicant needed to sell property to pay the County the money owed and that this issue is still unresolved. Mr. Basik confirmed that he attempted to first have the plats approved before recording them and to either put in the improvements .or come up with the bond. He stated that the last time he came before the Board, he submitted a commitment from a pension fund, and verified at that time that he would take care of this outstanding debt by e~ther the pension fund or from monies that came from the sale of pro- perty. County Attorney Cuyler addressed Mr. Basik and communicated that he did not consider Mr. Basik's approach of resolving the outstanding debt to the County - whenever he gets some money - as proper procedure for taking care of this financial situation. He declared that the Board has tried its best and staff has overly extended itself in assisting Mr. Basik through this whole process. Mr. Cuyler admonished Mr. Basik for claiming he was not informed of a deadline, and expressed that this was Mr. Basik's responsibility to know this. l~m~tl~ the recom~endationa of Mr. Mada~ewski, Go~ie~oner Sl~ml~mh~n ~mved, aaconded by Co~issioner Haeee and carried (Oo~dme~ner Volpe and Comumismionar Saunders opposed), that the Board Page 31 March 17, 1992 .rect Mr. Basik to provide a check for his outstanding debt in the amount of $§3,489.87 to Mr. Yonkosky within forty-five days and that a completely acceptable set of plans and a plat for Phese I be provided ''tO staff within 30 days. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Basik confirmed that he pay the $53,489.87 within forty five days and provide the plans and plat within 30 days. Attorney Cuyler advised that if in forty five days these - requirements hav~ not been met, he will assume that he has Board mutherAzmtt~n to pursue court action against Mr. Basik to recover BOaRD OF CO~]~r~ COg~4IS$IONERS~ COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Volpe scheduled in conjunction with the other Board members the fo/lowing dates for the Budget Workshops: March 24, 1992, .~. March 3X0 1992 and April 7, 1992, to be held after the agenda of the li~. Board of County Commissioners meetings. Commissioner Volpe communicated that the Collier County Sheriff's ~Office requested the Board schedule a workshop for one hour on April ,-i. 22, 1992, and the Board came to an agreement to meet at 3:30 p.m. on April 22, 1992, prior to the already scheduled 5:05 p.m. meeting on school impact fees. Commissioner Goodnight discussed that the City of Naples has ' transmitted a letter of objection to Coast Petroleum Company, in oppo- sition to their proposed off-shore drilling, and recommended that the [: Board follow suit. ,.. Commissioner Goodnight spoke concerning the passing of the bill to ~.~.." sunset RPC's. She specified that the representative appointed by the ? Governor to the M's Commission from Collier County is Va/erie Boyd. Commissioner Goodnight requested that the Board take some action as to its position on the sunsetting of the RPG's. Commissioner Goodnight asked that the Immokalee Day Care Center be Page 32 March 17, 1992 )laced on the March 24, lgg2 Agenda to discuss the waiving of road ~,,/mpa t fees. ~.?:.::. Cont~tsstoner Goodntght requested that staff provide information ![,,!..regarding the Glitch Bill on the r, DC. She related that one of the p. roblems that she has come upon is that large containers of fertilizer and pesticides cannot be stored but small containers can. ~ .~ She speclfted that a chemical company in Immokalee wants to move .,'f across the street and faces Going through a provisional use to store ~.large drum containers of l~qutd pesticide: she explalned that the zonlng ls the same, but they would no longer be grandfathered Gomml~sloner Shanahan suggested that staff prepare an interim ~'~ report be done on the horticultural pickup by the end of the month. ~s Co~lellone= Sh~ ~oved, seconded ~ c~l~ 4/0 (Co~ss~one= Goo~ght not present), that the roll,lng lte~ ~der the consent agenda be approved ~d/or adop- L,KASK ]d3R.KEMKJFT BETWEEN LEWIS COLLINS AND COLLIER COUNTY PROVIDING FOR C~[TI~I~D ~K OF UNIT #3 OF BADCOCK BUILDING, IMMOKALEE, ON MONTH TO MONTH BASIS B~/ CO~UNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ¢ . ~.~ FII&L PL&T OP "& SUBDIVISION OF TRACT E, AUDUBON COUNTRY CLUB, UNIT O]IE Jk~ R~CORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15, PAGES 30 THROUGH 35, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID&" - WITH STIPULATIONS AS DETAILED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Item See Pages. ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER FACILITIES FOR CORINTHIAN GARDENS & MARBKLLA AT TENNIS CENTER - WITH STIPULATION DETAILED IN THE P~'ECUTIVE OR Book 1715 Pages 1314 - 1327 92-170 R,K PRELIMINARY ACCKP'I'ANCE OF ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, "~ATEH~ ~MER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "CORINTHIAN · ':~ i~ AT MORT~D TENNIS CENTER" - WITH STIPULATIONS DETAILED IN TH~ 81 Page 33 March 17, 1992 SeePage I~ "~FT~I~ OF CREDIT ACCEPTED AS SECURITY' FOR LANDSCAPING FOR SITE D~F~LO~ PT~A~ NO. 9~-~3 'BARRINGTON CLUB" - IN THE A~0UNT OF $25,830.00 See Pages /0 ~ -- /~'~ -Xt~ e2U5 ~ to Item #8A4 NTH HR~ FOR PROVISION OF FUNDS FROM STATE LEGALIZED GRANT ON BFNa. LF OF COLLIER PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT * Itet~16C2 ~" LIBIt~H~A~TION SELECTION COMMITTEE'S SHORT LIST AND ~GOTIATION '~'~TA ~~H ~S~IA~S, INC. ~R LIBBY A~O~D ~ FINAL PAY R~QUEST NO. 9 TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH MITCHELL AND ~TARE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR EAST AND SOUTH NAPLES WASTEWATER COLL~'TIUN FACILITIES PROJECT; CONTRACT NO. 5 AND AUTHORIZATION FOR 812,500 PAYMENT THEREOF O~BID NO. 92-1845 FOR TEMPORARY DAY LABOR SERVICES TO ~, LABOR FORCE, C. M. PERSONNEL AND JOBCO LEA~~ BFI~ER~ LEWIS COLLINS AND COLLIER COUNTY PROVIDING FOR UTILIZATION BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF THE BADCOCK BUILDING, - $7,405,50 PAID AT $617.40 MONTHLY SeePages.. /~'/' "lt~OLOTION 02-171 RE CONTINUED OCCUPANCY BY EMS OF IMMOKALEE AIRPORT · F~ILITT -- 03,461.03 AIfNUALLY ':i' lt~BOLUTION 92-172 HE APPOINTMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR AND/OR ii A~SI~I[ TO PARTICIPATE AS A VOTING MEMBER OF THE RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES AS$OCI&TION, INC. Harch 17, 1992 See Page, FROM T. MALONEY OF 2.5 ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO NAPLES FOR S~kLEB PRICE OF $10,800 OR $4,320 PER ACRE Item #16H1 Item#16H2 AMARD OF CONTRACT FOR BID NO. 92-1847, BOARDWALK CONSTRUCTION AT VANDERBILT BEACH PARK, TO GARLAND & GARLAND, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,$22.63 ~CERTIFICAT~S OF CO]~RECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESENTED BY THE JLFFRAISER'S OFFICE 1990 TAX ROLL 309 1991-71 1991 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1991 TAX ROLL 03/03/92 03/03/92 145,153/158,161 18862 03/06/92-03/09/92 OF.LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER See Pages 83 Page 35 March 17, 1992 The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed as presented ~ by the BCC and with the additional item as indicated below: 1. Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board Minutes of 2/24/92. Page 36 March 17, 1992 ~16K1 USK OF COJlY*~SC&TED TROST FURDS TO P~:TRCHASE FOR $1~R*FI~'*S OFYZCK ~ T~CHII*/CA.T., KQUIPMKIF'I* There being no further business for the Good of the County, the ~eeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 2:30 P.M. as preser[~e~' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL approved by the Board on /J or as corrected ?' Page 37