Resolution 1984-036required by
Section 18 (5)
this petition,,
i 79 -62 as folks
r (S) Tha; �!
12' ` id
10, 29 01
f lood�
(6) Tha v ar
( &) A 61
' c tYi
(b) �► ' at
(c) A at
� pat
` 6 col
s (7) In p` in,
cone 0
79.t
NOW TNEREFORu
!,, Petition FDPC�
kJ, 5x
sz 4 1 + ` , The vaf t
' Elevatx .
4- 10.28 fa V
x t ' <
s
a 4 /VY rt
•* F,p`{ � Mfr
`�bruary 28, 1984'
'RESOLUTION 84 -4•36
s � � X"
TION FDp0- 84- V- 3' "F'OR A VARIANCE FROM
12,'41,= ELEVATION ',REQUIRED BY THE '
tIVENTION ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NUMBER
y ;
`j,,
ry
"ir, Nico -Vink desires to build a single family
-(Lot 28, Block '19, Unit 1, Marco Beach Sub -'
ted a variance!' from the Minimum Base Flood
ance Number 79 =62; and,
f Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing as
%Viewed Petition FDPO"- 844-2 in accordance with
(7), and has made a finding that the granting of
ith the intent and purpose of Ordinance Number
i
'eduction from the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM
boodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) requirement to
the minimum variance necessary, considering the
afford relief.
issued upon:
bf good and sufficient cause based on review of
Ions contained in (7), following.
ation that failure to grant the variance would
exceptional hardship to the applicant.
Ation that the granting of a variance will not
';increased flood heights, additional threats to
` ety, extraordinary public expense, create
Cause fraud on or victimization of the public,
with existing local laws or ordinances.
ri�this variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals has
w technical evaluations provided to it, all
i, the standards specified in Ordinance Numbet
1y, those contained in Paragraph 18 (7) (&-m)
RESOLVED by tha:,Board of Zoning Appeals, that
k�areby' granted subject to the following condition
$a for the reduction of the Minimum Base Floot
y Ordinance Nuttier 79 -62 from 12 feet NGVD11 two
r
"a
PAGE {
P r >,
d
P„
RELAi
TH6 "'Iml
FLOOD t
to
' 79 -63,
:gN'u
s
`� ";WHEREAS, " e
e
r h
hom4 t at 362 i
i
" d
division) and„
Elevation requf b
b
WHEREAS, t
`�bruary 28, 1984'
'RESOLUTION 84 -4•36
s � � X"
TION FDp0- 84- V- 3' "F'OR A VARIANCE FROM
12,'41,= ELEVATION ',REQUIRED BY THE '
tIVENTION ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NUMBER
y ;
`j,,
ry
"ir, Nico -Vink desires to build a single family
-(Lot 28, Block '19, Unit 1, Marco Beach Sub -'
ted a variance!' from the Minimum Base Flood
ance Number 79 =62; and,
f Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing as
%Viewed Petition FDPO"- 844-2 in accordance with
(7), and has made a finding that the granting of
ith the intent and purpose of Ordinance Number
i
'eduction from the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM
boodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) requirement to
the minimum variance necessary, considering the
afford relief.
issued upon:
bf good and sufficient cause based on review of
Ions contained in (7), following.
ation that failure to grant the variance would
exceptional hardship to the applicant.
Ation that the granting of a variance will not
';increased flood heights, additional threats to
` ety, extraordinary public expense, create
Cause fraud on or victimization of the public,
with existing local laws or ordinances.
ri�this variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals has
w technical evaluations provided to it, all
i, the standards specified in Ordinance Numbet
1y, those contained in Paragraph 18 (7) (&-m)
RESOLVED by tha:,Board of Zoning Appeals, that
k�areby' granted subject to the following condition
$a for the reduction of the Minimum Base Floot
y Ordinance Nuttier 79 -62 from 12 feet NGVD11 two
r
"a
PAGE {
P r >,
F
Il Any;
be
perm
ing+
3. The grant
the engini
A,', review
Ordinance
,
Appei
prop
U,
VI
liab
e
empl
�.�
WILLIAM, �0
tali
lawf
V��y
rasp
appl
t
i y�1i
>ti
,. aR,a�
Commissioner r.
"
Kruse
for the vote,
K
U,
VI
,EATTES7 k
�.�
WILLIAM, �0
V��y
t
i y�1i
>ti
,. aR,a�
yrr
K
Planning Dept'
5E
February 28, 1984
v Official Aall email -,a copy of this
loner by regiatored return receipt and such
i compliance with Section 18, Paragraph (10)
)i which reads `ats follows:
Aihom a variance is granted, shall
,notice that when's structure is
flt with the lowest floor elevation
.00d -elevation ,cost of flood
I ommensurate with the increased risk a
.a reduced lowest floor elevation."
variance has been predicated principally on
A information provided by the petitioner and
i respect to the considerations required by
of this variance by the Board of Zoning
make or imply any assurances that the subject
:urge are not subject to flood damages.
granting of this variance shall not create
part of Collier County or by any officer of
for any flood damages that result frog
g variance or any administrative decision
rounder.
this'varinncej the petitioner assumes ai:
or any property damage resulting from iti
motioned,; seconded by Commissiono'
the adoption of this Resolution. Upon cal
,tried.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY s �
CHAI
q
Zn
Y"
P r ^a✓
e
�I
' w
4A-0
I
9
y
nr.
E
�s
'a