BCC Minutes 05/26/1992 R Naples, Florida, May 26, 1992
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County c~f Co]Il,r, and alno ac:ting .]f~ the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGUL~-R SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Richard S. Shanahan
Patricia A. Goodnight
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
Director; Kathy Meyers, Annette Guevin, Debby Farris, and Ellte
Hoffman, Deputy Clerks; Neil Dorrill, County Manager; Ken Cuyler,
County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services
Administrator; William Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator;
Ken Baginski, Planning Services Manager; Ron Nino, Planner; Mary
Havener, Utilities; Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the County Manager
Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator; Dave Weigel, Assistant County
Attorney; Richard Yovanovich, Assistant County Attorney; Dave Pettrow
Development Services Director; Bryan Milk, Sam Saadeh, Chahran
Badamtchian, Project Planners; Bob Fahey, Solid Waste Director; Tom
Kuck, Transportation Projects Management Director; Tom Olliff, Public
Services Administrator; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects
Management Director; Reginald Boucher, Solid Waste Senior Engineer;
Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator; Barbara Burgeson,
Environmental Specialist II; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to
the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sheriff's Office.
Page
~ - APPR(~VED WITH CHANGES
May 26, 1992
Co~issio~,r Shanahan ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse ~nd
c~x-rJed =n~nim~m~l¥, to approve the agenda with the proposed changes
dat&~led ~ the, Agenda Change Sheet and the additional changes as
~oted
Item #16B2 moved to #8B1 - Recommendation to approve Task Order
for one Program Management Consultant, Gannett Fleming Engineers
Planners, i-o provide professional services on CIE projects.
Item #16B3 moved to #8B2 - Recommendation to approve Task Order #2
with our Program Management Consultant, Gannett Fleming Engineers
& Planners, to provide professional management services for CIE
Project No. 042, Vanderbilt Beach Road between U.S. 41 and
Gui[shore []rive.
Page 2
C~ &O~'D& - JLPPROV~I) J~D/OR ADOPTED
May 26, 1992
The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item
#16.
Commissioner Masse congratulated the following employees and pre-
sented them with Employee Service Awards:
Cecilia K. Martin, Planning Services - 20 years
Mary Jane Havener, Utilities - 5 years
FI~3CT,,,M~TIO~ D~,,~IG]ZIkTING ~ ~ Off i,(AY 25, 1992, AS CKRO~IC
CommAsmtoner Shan~h~n moved, seconded by Commissioner lias# and
cmrrted unant=crasly, t~t the pr~lmtlon ~st~tlng the mk of M
25, 1992, u C~ontc Fmtt~m l~ ~sf~ctlon S~o~ ~k ~
Page 3
Nay 26, ]992
92-251; 92-239; 92-281/282; A]I'D 92-215/288 - ADOI:~I~
curtld ~~Jly, that ~lt JaladJintl 92-251; 92-279;
92-281/212; a33d. 92-285/288 be Idopte~.
lte~ ~D
~ OII l~f~31lN FI]IA31CiAL INFOI~IATIO~ - &CC~FT~D
3ohn Yonkosk¥, Finance Director, reported that the following
are interim reports provided to the Board:
a) a seven month budget to actual reports for the Countywide General
Funds;
b) a seven month budget to actual revenue report for impact fees and
major Developmental Service charges;
c) a seven month budget to actual revenue report for local gas taxes
and major intergovernmental revenues; and
d) a schedule of Pooled Cash aa of April 30, 1992.
Regarding the County's Pooled Cash and Investment Account Report,
Mr. Yonkosk¥ recognized that the total for Yield Restricted Cash and
Pooled Cash and Investments is $207,966,922.97, and further noted that
the Bayerlsch (Livingston Road Bond Issues) and Svenska (Debt Service
Reserve for the latest utilities bond issue), are yield restricted
accounts based on money from the bond issues.
Mr. Yonkoeky indicated that several accounts have deficit balances
which he noted as follows:
a} #123 - & grants fund in which all the money ~, front-ended by The
Board of County Commissioners and then is reimbursed on a monthly
basis. The net effect to the General Fund Is a loss of Interest
on that $40,000 that Is charged to the General Fund;
b) #321 - a co~aunity development block capital outlay grant fund.
Although it :~hows $5,657 deficit, there is $35,000 worth of pocket
of poverty money that is remaininG in a separate account and will
off-set it;
c) #341 and #342 - anticipate this year to combine these two road
assessment funds and the net effect will be a positive cash
balance.
Regarding the Year to Date Expenditure Report, Mr. Yonkoaky noted
that the BCC roi' Sheriff in Lieu of Transfer amount of $417,525 is due
Page 4
Nay 26, 1992
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported that this
item Initiates a task order with Gannett Fleming Kngtneers & Planners
to support trans;portatton projects that are currently active, which
are as follows:
Approximately 40 hours of service for design, location and feasi-
bility of th,~ extension of Airport Road north of C.R.846 and
interconnectlon with Piper Boulevard.
2. A capacity analysis relative to the intersection of Golden Gate
Parkway and Airport Road.
3. Assistance relative to the access management control for Pine
Ridge Road between U.S. 41 and Airport Road.
C.R. 951 and meeting water management review relative to some
decisions theft will have to be made on the alignment of the lanes
for that project.
Some support functions for a classification-route study to support
some of the conclusions in the proposed access management policy.
Project services for negotiating an agreement for Vanderbilt Beach
Road between Airport Road and U.S. 41.
He recognized that the outlined hours within the task order
relate to dollar amounts.
cmi-rle~ unanimously, to approve Tmmk Otter #1 for Gannett Fining
I~gtneers & Plan~ers.
0oo,,=, N'
Page
Nay 26, 1992
TJI~i[ ~ ~2 l~ ~ FL~NING ~I(II~RS ~ P~ TO
~~Z~ ~~ S~Z~ ~a C~E ~0~ SO. 042 (V~~LT
~ ~) - (~I~D ~ 6/2/92
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald specified that
this item deal~, with Vanderbllt Beach Road between U.S. 41 west to
Gulfshore Driv~. He reported that this roadway has approached Level
of Service 'D' . He commented that the consultant will confirm the
scope of servl(:es of those design contracts to be considered, and be
able to carry through with that project, as well as undertake some of
the preliminary design studies that will assure that when the County
does negotiate a contract with the firm doing the actual design, the
activities of 1:he design consultant will be minimized.
He aummari::ed that Staff is recommending to take advantage of the
consulting se~lice contract for this particular project. He stipu-
lated that the consultant will be fulfilling a series of activity and
program requir,~ments that are outlined in the task order, which are
fairly well ee'tablished and controlled.
Commission,~r Saunders expressed that 8126,000 is a substantial
amount. Count'y Manager Dorrill suggested that the Board continue this
item to see in what phases the project is going to be done. He deemed
the amount of $126,000 is too high for Just preliminary design. He
suggested that page 8 be shown in layman's terms. Mr. Archibald added
that items on pages 8 and 9 can be consolidated so they are more
descriptive.
~l~ ~~ly, to c~tt~e this it~ for one ~k.
Its ~1
0IL ~ ~ - ~I~D ~ ~ ~6, 1992
Sam Saadeh, Project Planner, reported that this Petition.is for a
Conditional Use extension pursuant to Section 2.6.9, Essential Set-
vices of the A Zoning District. He noted that the Petitioner is
Nay 26, 1992
requestin~ a second extension for the 1,249 foot communications tower
on the east side of Oil Grade Road which was approved by the Board on
June 19, 1990.
Mr. Saadeh summarized that the Petitioner has failed to comply
with newly adcpted Ordinances - the Land Development Code, Ordinance
.... ~o. 91-102, and the Communications Tower Ordinance, Ordinance 91-84,
and therefore, Staff is recommending denial of this Petition.
Wlllt~us Darling explained that he is working with Mr. Ramsey. He
noted that the Colliers pulled the permit for this tower and intended
to build it, but then decided at a later time they did not want to
build it. He further noted that he had a meeting with Mr. Saadeh and
explained that he had approvals from the FAA and FCC and the County.
He remarked that he sent a letter to Mr. Saadeh on May ?, 1992.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Darling explained that he
holds the FAA and the FCC permits and the permits to implement the
building of tke tower.
C~Ti~ 4/~ (¢~l~iOZl~r ~ &b~tained), to cont~n~l~ th~s
P~titte~ te J~e 1%, 1992.
~ 26, 19t2
(~Allll~ &UTI~X2:ZD TO SIM T~ X~ITZI~T. OCAL A(I]tI~NT WIT~ T~Z CITT OF
Tom Olltff, Public Services Administrator, explained that this
item is an Agreement with the City of Naples, providing for an annual
~%'~ent by the County of $155,000 for beach parking and maintenance.
MarJoris WaI'd, representing the Citizens Association of Bonita
~each objected to this payment. She concluded that access to beaches
IhOUld be free.
~M ~mmlT, to ~t~rize t~ ~t~ to sip t~ ~t.
Page 8
May 26, 1992
· ~$ ~2 10:30 A.M. - R~conve~: 10:50 A.M. at ~tch ttmm
It~ ~1
Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator, presented a recouendation
to approve Amendment #3 to the 1986 agreement with Hole, Montes &
Associates for engineering and construction supervision services on
the South County Regional Wastewater Facilities, Phase I. He advised
the changes being requested are outlined in a letter attached to the
Exacuttve S~mmari prepared by Hole, Montes & Associates. He mentioned
also attached is a spreadsheet showing the history and breakdown of
the contract and what Increases have taken place over the six years
oince the Co~_nty entered Into this agreement. He reported the bulk of
the changes being requested this date, totalling an additional
$131,000, correlate to continuing to work with the Department of
~nvtronmental Re~ulation (DER) and the Environmental Protection Agency
{EPA) in an attempt to garner additional grant monies. He said struc-
tural changes will also be implemented that have been mandated by DER
or EPA.
In response to Commissioner Vo]pe, Mr. Arnold detailed the reasons
for the 3§% lncxease over the original contract amount.
cmrrtedvm~ntmox~ly, to approve As~n~nt ]1o. 3 to th~ miFr~nt with
~ole, Montes & Jasoctatms, for professional eniltn~rtni; ~ related
servi~ for t~ South County R~ton&l ~tewater Iactlltles, Pb~m~ I,
Page 9
May 26, 1992
FITITIOll P~D-92*-1, MICHAEL D. KELLY AND BA~[A~A C. KELLY, Ii, qUeSTING A
]I~ZON~ ~ C--4 TO PUD FOR AN AUTOMATIC AND SELF-SERVICE CAE WASH AND
AN AI~I~OBILE OIL CHA~GE/MAINTE]IANCE CENTER ON THE W~ST SIDE OF BALD
EAX~L~ ~i~F~ (~R 953) AND NORTH OF COLLIER BOULEVARD ON MARCO IST~tID -
Legal notic.~ having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 9, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public h~aring was opened.
Planner MilD: explained the subject site is within an Activity
Center located Itt the northwest intersection of Bald Eagle Drive and
North Collier BcJulevard on Marco Island. He indicated land to the
north of the subject site is zoned C-4 and is currently undeveloped,
while the inter~ectton of Bald Eagle Drive and North Collier Boulevard
contains the Wt~Ln Dixie shopping center and strip commercial. Ne said
to the west are Smokehouse Bay Condominiums and Sand Star Condominiums
which are separated from the subject site by an alley and a six-foot
stockade fence its well as canopy trees. Ne added Pelican Plaza is
developed to th~ east across Bald Eagle Drive, and land to the north
and south of that property is also zoned C-4 and undeveloped. He
described the p~titioner's request for a three bay self-service car
wash, auto tunnel wash, a detail service bay and a two-bay oil change
and ~aintenance facility. He detailed the permitted uses within the
C-4 zoning dist~'ict. He mentioned historically, a car wash was a Con-
ditional Use in C-4 but was inadvertently omitted from the ULDC as it
now exists. He advised the CCPC forwarded Petition PUD-92-1 to the
Board of County Commissioners with a rscommendation for denial due to
a tie vote. He reported Staff has received 2§ letters with concerns
about this petition, which have been addressed in the stipulations
added to the PUD document. Ne concluded glven the nature of the
ceco~ended stt~lations and the low traffic volume in comparison to
other uses allo~d in the C-4 zoning district, it is the opinion of
Staff that Petition PUD-92-1 should be approved.
Commissioner Hasse communicated his concern with the effects on
Page 10
May 26, 1992
the adjacent re:~idential area from noise associated with a car wash.
Attorney J~ms Karl, representing Michael Kelly, stated industry
experts have examined the Collier County noise ordinance and run
tests, resultin~! in a determination that the car wash will comply with
the noise level~ established in the Ordinance. He also indicated that
Mr. Kelly has slant much time looking for a parcel of land on Marco
Island for a cai' wash business, and there ls no available C-5 space
in an Activity (:enter within which such a business may be placed. He
pointed out the co~uaercial intensity of other uses allowed in the C-4
zoning district is much higher than what is being proposed by Mr.
Kelly.
Albert Amad]o, Sales Engineer with Sherman Industry in New Jersey,
stated the lates~t state-of-the-art equipment will meet and exceed the
requirements of the Noise Ordinance. He said commercial car washes
are better and safer for the environment than home car washing. He
noted several States are considering ordinances to limit car washing
to a co~uaercial car wash because of water management skills and the
fact that they are good for the environment.
The following people spoke regarding this item:
· f .
Perry Peeples
Joe Christy
Orace Mackay
Walter Zorn
F. Eugene Schumacher
Bill Pyle
Norbert Tesmsr
Milton Leonard
Frank Blanchard
Lou Hermes
Victor Rossetti
LaVerne Bela
Clarence Whitney
Charlotte Westman
Michael Kelly stated he has satisfactorily answered the concerns
regarding noise .and pollution. He reviewed the available parcels of
land on Marco Island. He reiterated that his proposed car wash is far
less intrusive than other uses allowed in the C-4 zoning district.
carrie~ ~aaed~e~ly, to close the public begrime.
In response ':o Commissioner Saunders, Planning Services Manager
Ken Baglnakl recaHled when the ULDC was drafted, the C-5 zoning
district was prol~sed for elimination. He said the original draft
Page 11
May 26, 1992
established a (:ar wash as a permitted use in the C-4 zoning district.
He ~ndicated w~en the Board asked Staff to bring back the C-5 zoning
district, car washes were transferred back to C-§, but it was
overlooked that th(~y had not been rep]aced in C-4 as a permitted use.
He noted car wa~sheu are be lng proposed as conditional uses tn the 0-4
zoning district In the upcoming glitch amendments to the ULDO.
Comuissione. r Saunders inquired if compatibility with surrounding
zontn~ is a permissible consideration for the Board of County
Co,missioners in a conditional use request7
County Attcrney Cuyler advised in his opinion compatibility is an
element the Board may consider in a conditional use request.
Comi~elouer ahanahan move4, ~econ~e~ by Commissioner Sha~ahan and
c~rrlg ~A~oul~, to deny P~titlcm PUD--92-/.
· .e ~t~c~m~d: 1:1~ P.M. - Rec~: 2:00 P.M. at which
I)~puty Olerk Farrtm replmced D~put¥ Clerk ~uevtn
DXS~N)S~L O~ ~P~ VKHXGLKS ~ ~IC A~ION - ~
Leo Ochs, A,i~tntstrattve Services Administrator, reported that
the Implementer.Ion of a vehicle asst~uaent policy Included reduction
of the size of The unassigned Motor Pool by approximately 70% and
that, along with the Implementation of a vehicle utilization policy
which establtah,~d minlmu~ mileage standards for designated vehicles,
was used to ~ak(~ recommendations to the Manager tn an effort to aright
size" the fleet and Improve the utilization of same. He confirmed
~h&t 39 vehiclefJ are being recommended to be placed on the surplus
vehicle list fsi' auction tn the hope that a savings of approximately
$64,000 In operating and capital recovery costs will be realized
annually aa well as an additional cost avoidance of $130,000 due to
the deferral of new vehicle purchases for this fiscal year.
o~r~ ~Msly, to muthorl~ tbs disposal of sm-pl~ v~hicla.
Itu~l
May 26, 1992
I~obert WaheF, Director of Solid Waste Management Department,
explained the Intent of this matter ia to acquire an additional 65
acres north of the County's present landfill site with the principal
ob3ecttve being to ~aintain compliance with the Growth Management ]:lan
m/%d provide for future resources necessary to properly manage solid
waste in Collies County. Using an aerial photograph, he identified
the location of the existing landfill, lands recently purchased as
well as that proposed for acquisition. He confirmed the County is
restricting Its purchase to undeveloped properties located in Section
~n~utng dls,:ueaJon rl~ve&led Co~iaeloner Ooodnight ia desirous of
staff providing Information which includes the location of properties
with existing ~3mee, the owners of same, and for the Board of County
Coniemionere t,3 take a stand and Inform the public of Its target
County Mans]er Dorrlll comnunlcated his willingness to meet with
the public to a~dress thflir concerns and advise them that the County
has ten years of available capacity at the existing landfill.
Conisetoner Saunders questioned whether the targeted area is
really the beat location for what essentially equates to a new land-
fill or if other locations should be considered.
County Manager Dorrtll pointed out that the County ts faced with a
double lined landfill cell for the next 10 acre cell at Immokalee, and
he reflacted on the high coat of same while questioning whether the
County can continue to own and operate two oepsrete landfills In two
different locations.
Brief dtec~sslon ensued regarding the economics of transporting
oolid waste to various areas, including the present I=~okalee land-
fill, and then discussion centered on the current location of the
urban boundary line.
Conlestonl~r Sa~mdere reiterated his re~eet for further analysis
of an mlternatKve site for location of a County landfill, but
concluded that evaluation of alternative sites is inconsistent with
'45
Page 13
Hay 26, 1992
approving the lt¢cr~tsttton today.
~ ~~ 4/I (~t~t~r ~rs ~), to a~ t~
Page 14
~ay 26. ~992
Assistant County Attorney Wetgel distributed a one-page handout
&nd explained it is a slight revision to page 3 of the Ordinance draft
c0ntalned in today's agenda package. He briefly summarized the
b&ckgrou~d of today's Ordinance proposal. He confirmed that infor-
mation received ~rom the Tax Collector's Office reflects that last
year $14,700 was collected for Collier County based upon the various
vesmall registered and that, If there Is no change in the ty~e or size
of VSlllll for the new year and pursuant to the Ordinance draft pro-
poled at this time, there will be an increase of $3,6?5.00 additions!
County revenue.
Commissioner Volpe questioned whether there is incentive ~or
owners to register their vessels elsewhere to avoid Co/liar County's
registration fee and Assistant County Attorney Weigel responded that
he can return with the relevant information to answer that question at
s later date, if so desired.
Ca~TI~ ~m~ni~lF, to cl~e the ~bl~c hearing.
Cowry Attorney Cuy]er advised ~t Je a]right to waive ~he normal
advertisement requirement as well as notice of intent to consider.
~l~r ~rm ~, ~c~d ~ C~m~l~r S~ ~d
Co~ Attornoy ~yler clarified the motion waives the normal
adverttseaent requlreaent and the nornal notice of intent to consider
~nd Ordinance as well as enacts through tho om~rg~ncy procedures.
Assistant County Attorney Netgel stated tha~, pursuant to th~ ban-
dit provided, he has added three words for clarity ~hat ar~ outlined
In yell~ on pa~e 3 with the statutory cite being a plain statutory
Page
Nay 26, [992
Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant to the Board, reported adver-
tisement requirements have been met and resumes received from nine
individuals requesting to be considered for appointment to the County
~overn~ent Productivity Committee. She confirmed that the names of
those being recommended for appointment are Identified by an asterisk.
Fo/lowing brief discussion, ~o~tsmioner Sa~nders
by C~t~io~er 6oodnt~nt ~nd carried nnanis~usly, to ~point tt~rc
~, {~m~mm~t D. ~air~ an~ Mary L. #iegold, thereby
Page 16
Nay 26, 1992
Sue Fi/son, Achalnistrattve Assistant to the Board, summarized the
tnfomtton detailed in the executive summary regarding current vacan-
cimm on this Board. She verified that the names of those being recom-
~ended for appotntmnt are Identified b~ an asterisk.
Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the Board of County
Comlsstonmrm previously accepted the report of the Home/ess Advisory
Co---itt~ and have subsequently had five members who have either been
rs~ved or have resigned from the nine member committee and suggested
that the }{oeless Advisory Conlttee be included a~ong those to be
revi e~d o
Coutsstoner Volpe advised it has been brought to the attention of
the Board of County Cow-issioners that there are members of the
v~rio~ mdvimory co~Jittees that are having business cards printed up
possibly indicating some type of off/c/al status.
Co~nznity Development Services Administrator Bruit reported that,
upon traqutrles from members of the Collier County Planning Coatssion
{CCPC) regarding the Issuance of business cards for them and upon
chscklr~g with Finance Director Yonkosk¥, it was explained that the
cards would have to be ~aid for by the members themselves.
D~trlng the ensuing discussion, Co~issioners Goodntght and Hesse
voiced objection to advisory boards having business cardm with the
count~' ~blea.
Following brief discussion of the qualifications of the appli-
cants,
Page ! 7
Hay 26, [992
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on May
6, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Planner Ntno ~x~mmartzed the intent of the request as detailed in
the gxec~ltive Summary. He confirmed there were no objections com-
~unicated to staff, that the plan in its new form is consistent with
the Growth Management Plan, ~d that the new PUD reflects all the stt-
~lat~ons ~d concerns evident in the original Arete PUD w~th some
addltlonal modifications as a result of the review process on The
Naples ~atlonal Golf Club. Me dtstrlbuted an addendum sheet
addressing modifications necessitated by typographical errors.
Kris D~e verified the changes are basically a do. scaling of the
residential ae~cts of the project and an lncrease In the amour of
pro~rty desl~ated for conservation ~rposes. He verlfled his client
~ rea~ to proceed wlth this development.
In res~nse to Co~issioner Volpe, Mr. Dane stated a letter has
~en recelved from the County indicating sewer servlce ls ~tlclpated
to ~ available wlthtn one or two years, and that a septic tank will
~ used tn the me.time.
~ ~l~ ~l~ly, to a~rm httt/~ ~92-3 with t~ 24
~t ~~tt~ ut tncl~t~ tb c~s n~tttg t~ for
~~ ~ ~tl~ ~dt~ ~2-~, n ~ter~ into
Ita~
~ -- ~ ~ ~I~TI~/~ ~DI~KD
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on May
6, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Plmnner Nino explained the nature of the Petitioner's request as
detailed in the Executive Summary, pointing out that the property
qualifies aa a residential tn-fill. Using an aerial photograph, he
identified the location of the subject property as well as zoning of
the ~dJacent properties. He reflected that all staff's concerns have
been embodied into the proposed PUD document.
objection froa neighboring property o~ners.
and water ts available to this project.
He reported receipt of
He verified that sewer
Bill Hoover of Butler Engineering, Inc. explained that 32 con-
doaintums will be constructed in the central portion of the site
w~thtn eight buildings with excavation around the area to create a
manmmde island. Using an elevation drawing, he proceeded to explain
soee of the particulars of the project. He revealed that the County
Attorney's Office has reviewed the PUD document and made approximately
one-half dozen changes to same which pose no problem to the
Petitioner.
During discussion regarding the height of the proposed fence to be
utilized around the subject site, County Attorney Cuyler advised that
the issue can be addressed by indicating the fence is not to exceed
six feet and the developer and architect need to determine whether
there is mdequate protection.
· ugene B. Cox stated he has no qualss with the project but
voice~ concern r~arding its water retention and water disposal.
Gar~ Butler, representing the petitioner, explained some of the
steps taken to address the concerns over drainage and discharge and
stated there w~ll be no negative impact on Mr. Cox's property.
Planner Nlno revealed that conversations with the County
Attorney's Office confirmed there will be minor insubstantial changes
required to the PUD basically dealing with punctuation and typographi-
cal errors.
Page 19
l~y 26, 1992
roll.lng brief dts~sston, ~lsst~ ~~ ~. ~
~t ~ ~ ~r ~111 ~t~ its fair m ~trl~tln
14gal notice having been published tn the Naples Dally News on Hay
1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Planner Reno explained this Itel tl neceslIteted by s sentence
being left out of the legal description, as eet forth tn the Executive
Btl~-y, ~nd dating back to the original approval of the Lely, A
R~sort Co.~unlt¥ POD.
Commissioner 8aundere left the seating at this tiN.
c, wrie4 4/0 (Cosm/sstoner Smmd~rs ~ot prs~r~t), to cl~ t~ ~lic
~tlllOner Volpe re.fred ~tng idvtsed by Co~ty Attorney
~lir t~t tn this inst~ce there tm no prohibition against his
m 66
Page 20
Nay 26, 1992
T,~gal notice having been l~Ubltehed in the Naples Daily News on
1992, ae evidenced t~ Affidavit of ~bllcitton fl1~ with the
Clerk, ~blic hearing wae o~ned.
C~lty ~lop~nt Se~tces A~tntetrator B~tt explained the
na~ of the r~est for a etreet n~e c~ge for a ~rtlon of Acre
N~e~ ~ f~ Acre ~er Road to ~oodcres~ Drive.
Co~l~ ~elopment Se~tces A~tnlstrator B~tt relay~
reco~tl~ that the applicant ~ar the cost of the ~ r~tred
ll~ at I cost of $100 each.
67
Page 21
)My 26, 1992
~O'MIT~OII ~2--$12, ~ FTflTZON CC~.~91-10, B~FTT D. NOOl~, P.~., OF
BOOGIe, I~qO'lT1'/]l~ VLRI&J/C~ FOR DOT 39, UR/T ONZ, BLOC~ &, ~
VJLID~I~I~TI~,JI)C~ ~:~T&T'~ - JLDOFTgDWIT~ ST/FUL&TIO~3
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May
10, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication fi/ed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Environmental Specialist Burgeaon stated that the Petitioner le
requesting I variance from the Coastal Construction Setback Line
(CCSL) to allow for the construction of a ewtutng ~ool, deck, d~L~le
walkover, fence, landscaping and revegetation. She noted that the
· ub~ect property tm a single family parcel on the west side of Gulf
Shore Drive, in Vanderbtlt Beach Estates. She reported that a resi-
dence ~nd pool currently exist on the site seaward of the CCSL.
Me. Burge~on ex~lained that the petitioner intends on moving the
existing hov~e and rebuild one landward of the CCSL and add to the
existing pool. She indicated that a dune walkover will be constructed
for access to the beach and the fence will be constructed seaward of
the pool.
Me. B~lrgeeon advised that the propused dune walkover, fence,
landscaping end dune vegetation are consistent with the Land
Developlent Code. 5he divulged that swi~stng pools, decks and screen
e~clo~uree are consiaten~ with F.S., Coastal Zone Protection Act and
the Collier County Growth Nanage=ent Plan.
WI. Burgeeon stated that staff recomaends approval of this
l)etttlon, ~ubJect to the stipulations contained in the executive emi-
There were no speakers.
Mil els~ledmsmdmmslF, to close the public hearing.
~ 22
P~ge 23
26, 1992
/~KIC~,~GII ~2-01~, RZ FZTITIOI V-92-11, ~ BISROP AIID SLRT NCZIITTI~
[EZI~BIIT21~ GRIdIZ CC~B~IKZTT DAY C~LRZ BC~OOL XZC~STZI[G VARLMI~'~S FOR
legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on Nay
10, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the
Clerk, public hearing was oI)ened.
Planner Sadamtchtan Indicated that the petitioner Is requesting a
10 foot variance from the required side yard of 15 feet to 5 feet on
the eut side of the property, a 5 foot variance from the required
land~cap~ buffer of 10 feet to 5 feet on both sides of the property in
the purklng area, and a 10 foot variance from the required landscape
buffer of 10 feet to zero on the east side of the building line for
property located on Hunter Boulevard, Golden Gate City. He noted that
the applicant submitted a minor site development plan on September
1991, however, the SDP was placed on hold on October 3, 1991. He
reported that on November 13, 1991, the Cow-lesion adopted the Collier
County Land Development Code which contained revised setbacks and
zoning standards.
Nr. Bada~tchlan explained that the petitioner is requesting the
variances in order to construct a child care center, In accordance
with the site development plan submitted to Planning Services. He
affirmed that the CCPC, by a vote of 8/0, recommend approval of the
requested variance, subject to the stipulations contained in the
Agreement Sheet.
Ns. Xaren Bishop, representing the Petitioner, advised that
Reverend Nclntyre and his family currently own day care centers In
Golden Gate, East Naples and North Naples. She revealed that the pro-
posed facility will acco-~odate 75 children.
There were no speakers.
and ema~le~m/mm~l¥, to cloe~ tbs public hearing.
May tS, 190~
000~ 75
Page 25
Nay 26, 1992
Cc~mt¥ Manager Dorrlll recalled that when the Pelican Bay Services
DlVtllon w~s created last year, the Coulee/on consented that there
would be a spec/al board meeting once a year and at the same time, a
rev/e~ of that budget. He requested that the Coma/se/on mat aside
July l, 19920 at 6:00 P.M. for that purpose.
After d/scuss/ng various dates that would not conflict with the
Co~mtelicmers* schedules, It ~s the consents of the ~ard that The
~tlnG at Pellc~ Bay ~ held on J~e 29, 1992 at 6:00 P.M.
See Page.
Item
&K~I3PEiilI~ OIP LITTIR O~ Ci~DZT AS SI:CI:TRZYT YOR
See Page~s g..~ "-
1992
&C3CIZ,'rJ, IK~ Off
92,618.
~O~LFrTKROY CltZ:DZT AB BI;CITRZI"T FOR LAMX)SCJ~ZMG ffOlt Brx"Z
01'
~ ~-~Ot FIIOVXDXN ~ ~I4ZMT Off LXB31FORTll~ COWTOFTEB
IJ~eI*I'~Bg, XOII~XI&IICBOI/,O'r6, BX,OC~2, ~m, QMII3tOIP
Se. P.ge.
RECORD - T~.,XX LERCH FA.kilLY TRUST
See Pages
REBOE,U~fMI t'A-~07 IqtOVXDXMQ /'OR AJSESSMZ31T O~ LXI:II flOP.. ~ COW?
/~&'I'I~M~O~ lq]lX, XO MUXBAIICE OII LOT 16, BLOCE. 266, CIOTdI~M GAl'Z,
OF RBOQIID - PAOX, L. RX~~Iq, Blt.
]:tmm ~J, EBI -- mmffadl to 4t~B2
XtmmN- ~ to m2
~ltmm m
~ Off I'Bll:RAM*9 11AMSIK~TATXOI I"'ItO43P-M4 8Z/L~XC'E~ ~
Page 27
26, 1992
See Pages
Xta ~11~ - blet~
~~ ~ A ~~
~O~OJ*AMASSXGJB(KIT AMD ASSOltffPTXOM~ BrTMKI3I COLLXKR
COOlITYAIID:.Tll BOOTH 1T.,OR.XDAMATIRMAMAGKMKJlT DXSTRXCTRZGA.qDXlWG
I:]BAXIAS~ R~T~R*'I'B AIIDMAXIrT'KMAMCK R:~'POI~XBILXTX~
See Pages
Page 28
Idm¥ 26, 1992
AUT'BOIIZ&~ O~ IJOTICE8 TO COllECT AID ZFI'KR~M ACCKPTAilCE OIP &B. IrlT~
SIEMER J~f31L~ ri 1'111 II&PLES PRODUCTZO~ PARK M.$.T.B.U.
AUTB013:~.~TZOg O1~ BIOT~CE~ TO COJ~rI~T ~ T*FI"ERIM ACCKIPT~ OF S&IF~TARY
~ lPI~I'L~ Tlr THI PINK RIDGE IBI'DOSTRTAL PAR~ M.S.T.B.U.
Ztem #16H6
BID 92-1865 FOR ANNUAL SOIL PURCHASES AND DELIVERY RELATED TO
LANDSCAPING PROJECTS - AWARDED TO RILLAR¥ PEAT AND FOGG'S NURSERY AND
MULCH SUPPLY
1989 TAX ROLL
~0. DATE
292/293 5/11/92 - 5/13/92
1990 TAX ROLL
NO. DATE
326/317 5/22/92 - 5/13/92
RO,
179/180
184/191
1991 TAX ROLL
~0,
1991-09/1991-102
DATE
5/21/92
5/8/92 - 5/20/92
1991 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
DATE
5/7/92 - 5/21/92
Ztel eli,TO
1992
The following mtacellaneoua correopondence aa preoented by the
Board of County Coumleolonero wac filed.
Pmgm 30
Hay 26, ~992
There being no further buolnee, for the 0ood of the County, the
~eeting ~ adjourned by Order of the Chair - T~me: 4:15 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
NICHA~B)J. ~OLPE. CHAIRI~LI, N
Page 31