BCC Minutes 06/16/1992 R Naples, Florida, June 16, 1992
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and ss the governing hoard(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted busines~
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION In Building
#F" Of the O~vernment Complex, ~lat Naplem, Florid4, w~th the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
(ABSENT)
Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Burr L. Saunders
I~lx A0 Names, Jr,
Patricla A. Ooodn~ght
ALSO PRESENT: Jim Giles, Clerk of Courts; John Yonkosky, Finance
D~rector; Ellis Hoffman, Kathy Meyers and Debby Farris, Deputy Clerks;
Ne~/ Dorrill, County Manager; Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the
Cotmty Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Brenda Wilson, Mar]otis
Student, David Weigel, Dennis Cronin and Rich Yovanov~ch, Assistant
County Attorneys; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services
Adlin~ltrator; Mike Arnold, Utilities Adm~nistrator, F~ed Bloetscher,
Pro]acta Management D~rector; Tom Olliff, Public Se=v~ces
Administrator; Ron Cook, U~l~t~ee F~nance D~rec~or; Ron Jamro, Museum
D~rector; Ph~p Scheff and Sam Saadeh, Planners; Sue F~lson,
A~n~strat~ve Assistant to the Boa=d~ and Deputy Byron Toml~nson,
-Sheriff's Office.
Page
(4,1)
June 16, 1992
Comm/~toner Shanahanmoved, ~econded by Commtee/oner Huee and
carried unanimously, that the agenda be approved with the changee
d~ta/led on the Agenda Chang~ Sh~t and the follo~/ng additional
Item #80! - Recommendation that the Board of County
Co~ualeeloners review the current park related land holdings
~nd authorize the sale of fifteen (15) acres of property
within Pelican Bay - To be introduced and then continued to
6/30/92.
09
Page 2
June 16, 1992
h ~otioa for ei~rova! of the Consent Agenda Is noted under Item
,16.
[}~: M~IflJT~ OF TRII R~GUL&R N~NTING OF ~BRUARY 18, 1992 - &PPROVED
Co~tseLon~r H~se ~oved, emconded by Co,missioner 5hanahan and
ca~rl~un~n~u~!¥, to appr~ the mtnuten of the R~ar ~tlng of
Feb~ 18, 1992.
Co--tse/oner Volpe presented an Employee Service Award to Ramlro
,Ponce, of the Road and Bridge Department, for five years of service
!!':'with Collier co~ty Gover~ent.
(~)
~ ~~ 92-302; 92-304/305; 92-307/309; 92-312/314; ~
CommlooloneF Haooe moved, oeconded by CommteeLoner 8hanmhan and
c81~1ed unmntBouoly, that Budget AmendBmnte 92-302; 92-304/305;
o~-ao~/soo~ 02-~2/~14; end o2-31s/3~ be 8dopted.
(480)
~ ~ RL~OLUTIOX 92-22-& - &DOX:~LTD
Co~t~Loner Hu~ ~wd, ~conded by Conteeloner ~ ~nd
carried un~n/mou~ly, that Budget Amendment Re.slut/on 92-22-A be
. en 000 ,.
Page 3
3une ].6, 1992
~.. (cB~)
Finance Director Yonkosky recalled that on October 16, 1990, the
Conlsslon approved an agreement with Coopers & Lybrand, Certified
Public Accounts for the audits of Collier County for the two fiscal
years ending September 30, 1990 and 1991. He Indicated that the
agreement provided for one additional year, if approved by majority
vote of the Board.
Mr. Yonkosky advised that Coopers & Lybrand has requested that the
Coulsslon exercise this option to extend the agreement for one addi-
tional year.
Mr. Yonkosk~ reported that the first year contract cost was
$155,000, however, this has Increased by a not-to-exceed 6~ cost of
living Increase each year. He revealed If the extension Is approved
this year, the cost to the County will be $174,158.
Mr. Yonkoskw requested that the Co,lesion review the status of
the contract and provide direction as appropriate.
Couissioner Saunders remarked that he is supportive of extending
the contract for one year, but It seems appropriate to have com-
petitive selection for next year. Mr. Yonkosk¥ agreed, noting that it
iS the Intent of the Auditor's Finance Committee to solicit proposals
at the end of that period.
Co~tuio~r ~mders moved, ~conded by Co~i.slo~r Sh~nah~n and
~ig ul~ly, t~t t~ c~tr~t with C~rs t Lybr~ ~
(esa)
Finance Director Yonkosky stated when the Couleslon established
the plan of dissolution for the Pelican Bay Improvement District
Page
June 16, 1992
(PBID), through Resolution 91-217, it was anticipated that at much
tl~e ae financial and other significant benefits existed to allow for
tho Collier County Nater-Sewer District to refund the PBID bonds,
staff would cone back before the Board. Re noted In recent weeks,
there have been several discussions and the Commission approved
refunding those bonds.
Nr. Yonkosky explained under Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and
F~change Act of 1934, the Board of Collier County, Ex-Officio, the
~overning board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District suet
approv~ the fora of the Preliminary Official Statement as fine1 prior
to Its tale&se to potentt&l Investors. lie pointed out that last week,
he distributed to the Co~tsston a copy of the Preliminary Official
· tate~ent. He Indicated that ~nds are ~ttclpated to be prtced the
~lk of J~l 22, 1992.
.. ~. Yo~osky ~ested ~pprov~l of the Preliminary Offlctal
Page 5
3une 16, ].992
I~tUI~TTOOBTAXMAFFROVAL FOR TEE P&l14W11T OF TI~ 8ECO31D ~?lO~
~ FIt0N TEE $15,T80,000 COi44~tCXAL PAFB3t FltOGRA14 - REBATE Il T~
ANOU~T OF $?0,624 APFROVED
Finance Director Yonkosk¥ advised that the Tax Reform Act of 1986
created the Arbitrage Rebate Rules, and these rules require agencies
that issue tax exempt bonds or loans to rebate to the Internal Revenue
Service the excess of Interest earnings over the actual Interest
expense of that bond Issue or loan. He revealed in 1989 subsequent
mnd~ente ~ere made to the Internal Revenue Code and allowed an
issuing agency to elect a one time nonreversible penalty method of
calculating the rebate. He Indicated under the penalty method the
issuer ia allowed to keep all the Interest earned, however, If a cer-
tain spending pattern is not met, a penalty ~ust be paid to IRS In the
form of a rebate.
Nr. Yonkosky referred to the Executive Su;mary, detailing the
&mount of the net proceeds that smst be spent within the specific rise
?i~i~ltlltao Re annotmced that prior to borrowing the $13,750,000 It was
aftttclpated that the proceeds would be spent within the required time
frames, however, this has not been set, therefore, rebate payment must
Nr. Yonkosky stated that since the date of borrowing, through
April, 1992, the Interest earned Is $89i,377, less the rebate of the
first Interest calculation In the amount of $13,001, the second calcu-
lation is now $70,624 and the net Interest earned Is $810,752
Nr. Yonkoek¥ requested that the Co~u~tseton approve the rebate In
tha mmount of
ce~tedurm~tmm~l¥, to ~ th~ retire In th~ ~mount ot STO,6~& to
the Inte~m~l ~ ~ervlce.
:;.FR~ I. TBQN~, 31t., REFitE~ITX~ COLI, XEIt COUNTY ~K)~XIG AUTIORXTT
~ ~0~SX]K3 COI44XTTE~
000 ?~t! 18' Page 6
Suns 16, 1992
Mr. Fred Thomas, Executive Director, Collier County Housing
Authority, called attention to and read Section 3 - Housing, provided
in Resolution 90-292/Development Order 90-3, relating to the Grey 0aka
DRI. He noted that the Barton Collier Company ie willing to donate 15
acres of land, adjacent to Parmworkere Village in Immokalee and sell
at one-haiti of Ate fair market value to the Houstno Authority, 50+
acres oti land adjacent to Collier Village.
Mr. Thomas requested that the Commission interpret an agreement of
this tTpe as satisfaction oti provision in the Development Order. He
advised that he approached the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council (SWFRPC) and they have communicated that "The Development
Order for Grey Oaks, DRI, specifies that the applicant shall reserve a
tract of land within the development for participation in a housing
program adopted by the County .... and SWFRPC suggests that the County
pursue the exchange of 15 acres of land adjacent to Farmworkers
Village in Immokalee. The primary reason for the support of this
exchange is the success that the Collier County Housing Authority has
tn experiencing the development of a model housing project in
Far,workers sites, of the for the
Village
Although
support
exchange
luokalee parcel site should be considered an exception to the reaso-
n&bls distance policy followed by the County. the ability of the
Housing Authority to put affordable housing on the grounds warrants
~upport of the Council and the County."
In response to Commissioner Goodnight, Mr. Thomas reported that
the tiunding for the 15 acres will be provided by FMHA and limited to
farm labor housing. He announced that he is attempting to have HUD
provide the unite for the 50+ acres.
Mr. David Borden, representing Peninsula Improvement Corporation,
stated that the commitment to sell the land does not include any par-
ticular uae contingencies.
AssiSt&hr County Attorney Student stated that she believes it
!~.:..wo~ld be appropriate for the Commission to direct the County
Attorney's Office to do additional research in this regard since DCA
19
Page 7
3une 16, 1992
i~f", is involved and they could challenge any amendment to the Development
Order. She remarked that the proposal and the language in the
Development Order need to be reviewed to determine what may be needed
in way of a formal amendment to the Development Order. In addition,
~ ~~r she related that input from DCA should be obtained with regard to the
i?* '~ proposal.
Con.unity Development Services Administrator Brutt suggested that
the proposal be reviewed by members of the Affordable Housing
Commission to receive their Input. In addition, he remarked that the
? * DRI language does not indicate that the land shall be sold and the
,i,' money is to come back for affordable housing. He stated that there
:- should be a more thorough evaluation of the complete package.
" Coo~lssioner Shanahan ~ad, eecomle~ by Commissioner Saun~re and
~'. car~l~ unanl~ly, to c~c~lly s~r~ the ~roachl ~talf to
}~,, ~t~ t~t fr~ ~ ~ ~ Affor~ble l~t~ Co~lseton.
~ILIZINO ~ ~I~ ~OD OF COLLECTION - ~KS IN ~SES~
R0~ - ~D
Legal notice having been published tn the Naples Daily News on May
12, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was continued from June 9, 1992.
Utilities Administrator Arnold advised that Items #12C1 through
#12C4 correlate with Districts I through · of the East and South
Naples Sewer Project. He recalled that the public hearing relative to
, ·
District 5 is scheduled for July 21 1992
Mr. Arnold reported that as previously directed by the Commission,
he will be presenting various funding alternatives. He advised that
as it presently stands, with the reductions and mitigating steps that
have been taken thus far, the total amount to be recovered through tbs
assessments ts approximately $27.4 million. He indicated that items
to be considered for further reductions are: school assessments
000,, 2O
Page 8
June 16, 1992
totaling $207,000; paving costs totaling $796,000; approximately
8495,000 from the South one-half of Sewer Area "B" MSTD monies do not
directly relate to a reduction in assessments, however, refunds would
' be made to those property owners or a reduction would be made in the
ad valorem tax bills.
Mr. Arnold stated that the Co~tasion may wish to consider a 81.00
per month surcharge on all sewer bills for those within the Collier
County Water/Sewer District since some benefit did accrue to all those
(' users.
however the sizing of that issue was predicated on projections in
terms of Impact fee collections. He noted that 100~ of the impact
fees were ~dgeted to be ftn~ced but tn actuality, this Is running
· ~t 40~ ~d there are collections tn excess of the projections in
Mr. Arnold recalled that last year there was a refinancing of
bond Issues and new money was Involved in terms of additional
water/sewer projects proposed. He indicated that $8 million was
targeted for sewer projects to be constructed with the bond proceeds,
the Impact Fee Trust Accounts. He reported that the excess fees may
be used to buy do~fll the second bond issue. He stated that staff pro-
poses to buy down 82.7 million of the East and South Naples bond
issue, resulting In a 10~ reduction across all five districts. Re
advised that in order to do this, It would be necessary to amend the
bond resolution that accompanied the refinancing last year. He
revealed that he believes this is a supportable mechanism to reduce
the assessments.
Mr. Arnold stated that the 8207,000 school assessments could be
paid fro~ General Fund Reserves.
Co~mteeloner Saundere indicated that he supports using the unin-
corporated area general fund ad valorem tax fund for the $207,000.
Conieatoner Shanahan concurred with Co.missioner Saunders'
suggestion.
Co--isotoner Yelps suggested that this be spread out county-wide.
Contsetonere masse and Goodntght concurred.
Page 9
3use 16, 1992
With respect to the paving costs, Hr. Arnold revealed that
$175,000 could be committed to the buy do~n of the assessments, and
the remaining balance of $621,000 could be paid from Utility Reserves
a~d subsequent to Board action today, an agreement could be prepared
between the Water/Sewer District and the Board of County Commissioners
setting forth a nuJber of years for repayment back Into the Utility
laaervaa. The Commission concurred with this suggestion.
Ooatsatonar Volpe questioned whether staff has been able to do
anything with regard to reducing the interest rates. Mr. Arnold
replied that this has been discussed with the Underwriters and the
,~-: Financial Advisor, and they ara not recommending a reduction In
· Interest rates since they are already down to the bare'bones which Is
6.6~.
Mr. Arnold reported that the proposed $2.7 alllton buy down of the
bond Issue will result In a 10~{ reduction in the assessments; 3~
reduction In the paving costs; school assessment (District I only)
reduction; and the south half of Sewer Area "B" {District 1)
reduction.
see {~ 10:40 A.#. - Weconv~ne~ lO:SS A.M. ese
The following persons spoke with regard to the Zest and South
~..~.Waplee Sanitary Sewer System:
...~ Mr. Harold Hall
Ns. Nsry-Francea Kruse
· Mr. I~obert ~resh~ua
. Mr,:'.' Jerry House
M~, ,~' ~-arry ln~ram
Jo~ Fa~er
; ~. HI Lepley
.~ TUB Stasko
~ ~rphy
:.J~e 1 Ferrell
Pastor David Mallory
las# moved, secoude~ by Oo--is~loaer ~x~tul{ht ami
~une 16, 1992
· caz~led~m~m~ml?, to clo~ the public baring,
The Commission concurred with the following funding alternmtlvee:
02.7 million to buy down the assessments through the excess bond pro-
ceeds, which represents a 10~ reduction; $500,000 rebate to property
owners relative to the south 1/2 of Sewer Area "B" monies; $796,000
paving costa advanced from Utility Reserves with $206,000 school
assessment reimbursed through county-wide General Fund.
Mr. Arnold announced that staff will Insert the reduced dollar
amounts per d/strict and revise the front footage rates tn the
appropriate resolutions. Re advised that he will report back to the
Commission later in the day with the revised numbers at which time the
Board will take action on adopting the resolutions. He remarked that
the list of changes that staff was previously directed to make will be
incorporated into the final adoption package.
C4~i~r ~d~rs moved, Hconded b~ Com~lHton~r Sh~n~han ~nd
c~L-FIH ~Imou~ly, to a~r~ the 2? ch~ges, to the District ~
~1~ ~~t ~11, . l~lcatH In Staff's ~lbit.
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ MON-~ V~O~ ~5~5~ ROLL ~R
~ILIZIN ~ ~I~ ~0D OF COLLECTION - ~GE5 IN ~E~
;?
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May
12, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, ~ublic hearing was continued from June 9, 1992.
This Item was discussed in conjunction with Item #12C1 above.
CommImmA~nmr Ilmmae moved, seconded by Commlsaioner Ooodntght ~nd
~x'~I~vAr~w~Isto~mly, to close the publtc hemr/ng.
C~mm/ut~r kund~re ~ov~d, seconded by Coulesloner Sb~uz~z~ ~nd
g~l~d ~Im~u~ly, to approvw the one change to the Dletrtct
l~lt~Jke~e~em~nt Roi1, u Indicated tn Staff's Exhibit.
ese ~ at 1:15 P.N. - lteconv~ned at 2:05 P.N. at ~ich
t~ ~ Clerk ~rs replac~ ~ty Clerk Eo~
3un~ 16, 1992
~ ~OU~I~G ~tL~OR~ PRE~E~I~D BY 3J~l~ VARNER R~I~J~S~IEG /q[g
T&~PAt~ ACTIO~ GROUP
Sane Varner referred to the details of a report (copy of packet
not provided to the Clerk to the Board) on the conditions of affor-
dable housing in Naples. She discussed that TAG has reviewed the
final report from the Affordable Housing Task Force dated 1990 and
discussed the portion containing the Wolf Study. She commented that
the Wolf report refers to a vast shortage of affordable housing, which
mhm deemed dad not bear out reality, since the newspaper shows many
vacancies in rental properties.
She requested that the County review the actual needs for affor-
dable houming, and to take into consideration what is a/ready
currently available.
The following people spoke to this issue:
Greg Mthaltk
Jan Pardue
~'Pat Pilcher
[i...' Mr. Mlhalik and Ma. Varner agreed to meet to discuss this issue
ilit: further.
(,es)
'Xtlmdrl, Z
~ ~ ~xsa ~. ~A~ ~o ~osxB~ ~XC~CLXXG, SZAX*W.~OAPm~XXG, awn
~ ~ o~ sso~xwo czw.zza SXD~S - cov~r~ A~ DZW~C~D
LAma A. Paul reported that skateboards and bicycles are becoming a
":~"' hazard in 8hopPing centers. She explained that in addition to her-
self, various merchants as well as shoppers would like an Ordinance
J-'~ . proposed that would prohibit these activities. She pointed out that
oven with posted signs, the Sheriff's Department has no enforcement.
She noted that the Sheriff's Department concurs that it is needed.
County Attorney Cuyler advised the Board that he will research
. this request, determine if an ordinance can be drafted, and if so
Page 12
it will be advertised and presented to the Board.
Robert Just spoke to this issue.
Suns 16, 1992
C~X~tIMW~wxIIo~Ii¥, to direct the Count7 Attornr/ to tnv~mttpte the
~bltl~ at bt~lt~, roller
~te~ ~i~l~ ~ t~ ~~t ~a~ttng of ~ ordl~ce.
(87e)
Xt~
~ ~. ~S ~XTXON ~R & ~1~ OF I~&CT ~ ~~ ~R
Frank P. Nurphy, Attorney representing churches of East Naples,
explained that since he flied this Petition, Staff has revised the
Impact Fee Schedule. He deemed the revision aa fair and equitable.
Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator, distributed a
handout which is a proposed appendix to the Impact Fee Ordinance, with
the revision that the rates for sewer impact fees will be based on
water meter size. He noted that data is betng finalized by Staff, and
the Co~u~t¥ Attorney's office Is preparing a revision to the Impact Fee
Ordinance, which will be presented to the Board at a later date.
(10S0)
Xt~ 'ND1
)~I~J;~X0~ 92-S40/CRa 92-16, D~I~XIrXNG I~l CO~V~Y~ OF ~aal~l~ ~JD
TIL~~OF UTXLXTT ~RV/C~ FOR M&T~, S~E~R J~ XRRXG&TXOII S~RV/C~
~ F~LXW B&T - iDOPT~
Fred Bloetscher explained that this Resolution will allow the
selling of bonds to refund the current Peltcan Bay Bonds and transfer
that debt obligation to the Hater-Sewer District and at the same time
transfer th~ assets to the Mater-Sewer District.
Page 13
3une 16, 1992
(118l)
II~L~TZQIIIRT-~O-2~, NIC~JLI~ R&NS~f R/3q~8iRTZXG NZT,,E~ C.
TRUITBB, I1:~~ A COIIDZTZOIIJLT~ O'a~ ~["l"~ZO~ PO'RSU&,IT I'0 S'DI~cJ~CTZO~
~ O~ ~I"ZOI ~.~.9 (~g:lr'l'Z,Ikr., ~g/~9'ZC~) OE ~ "A" 7.,OIIZIIG DZS"'I'I~ZC~
Sam Saadeh, Project Planner, reported that Staff has not received
any of the Information requested from the Petitioner, and thereffore ts
recoamendtng denial of the Extension due to an incomplete submittal.
~ gi~'~ied &lO, (~issioner Sh~rilIa~n &b~t&in~t) to d~ny htit/on
June 16, 1992
(~28o)
Xtra ~1
AOTNOR/ZATIOM OF SALE OF YIFTEEN ACRES OF PROPERTY IH I~LICAR BAY -
~~ TO ~ 30, 1992 ~ CO~ A~O~ DI~C~ TO CO~A~
~~E TO OBTAIN A D~ED ~T ~ NO ~~ ~IBION ~ IS
Tom Olltff, Public ServJces Administrator, reported that the l§
acre parcel In Pelican Bay ts adjacent to the library and the proposed
EMS facility.
County Attorney Cuyler confirmed that the PUD designates that this
site can be used as governmental facilities or a community park.
Mr. Olltff explained that the original Intent of the'l§ acres was
for park property, however the Park Staff has indicated that tn terms
of acreage and size, a more sizable parcel would be desirable.
Dennis P. Crontn, Assistant County Attorney, advised the Board
that the ability to transfer the Pelican Bay site once it is accepted,
will be restricted by the PUD, and the uses Identified within the PUD.
Commissioner Saunders stated he ts not persuaded that this pro-
perry should be sold.
Commtlaloner S~underl moved, leconded by Commissioner Hues and
!? cmrxle4 unanimously, to reject the accept~ce of t~ ~tt clatl ~
, :* ~ttt~ ~ ~lttnghoule Co~lttee ae it te tnco~tltent with the
~, ~ dtr~t the C~ Attorney to contact ~sttngh~le to obtain
~:.~:. I d~ ~t ~ no rnerter provision ~d te coutetent wtth the ~.
~TI~ ~~D OF ~ D~ ~R ~ HISTORIC C~I~ ~RY
~~ ~ ~0~ ~ ~ ~~ES ~~ CLX, INC. - ~ 0F
A~I~ ~ ~ D~~ ~ ~~ES CI~ ~ ~I~S OF ~
Tom Olltff related that this Is a donation of property and a
building located tn the Everglades City area from the Everglades
Woman's Club, to be converted Into a museum.
Mr. Olllff referred to the details of the Executive Summary
regarding this item.
Mr. Olltff noted that one of the restrictions tn the deed states
Suns 16, 1992
that the property Is to be used only as a museum.
Ron Ja~ro, ~useum Director, related that Everglades City is the
origins of Collier County and froa a long term strategic view, he
deemed the property to be in a proper location and the building to be
a sound structure.
Pauline Reeves spoke to this ires.
~atot~r ~u~ers ~ov~d, secon~d ~ Couissto~r S~n ~
~i~ 4/1, (~ssi~r Vol~ o~) to accept t~ ~ ~ ~ise
a pl~ Of ~ti~ with the CiW of ~ergl~s ~d the ~ten~ of the
~ for ~ ~lo~nt of the faciliW into a ~.
It~
I~OT. UT~ON 92-341[C~ 92-21~ RE THE ~ORTH
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
June iS, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Items #15D5 and #15D6 were heard in conjunction with #8D2.
Fred Bloetscher reported that the proposed Agreement has been
modified, and noted that it will recognize incorporation into the
County's Regional System, and exempt North Naples Utilities customers
from water impact fees.
Regard/ng sewer impact fees, Mr. Bloetscher reported that the
developer will pay the Impact fees, and therefore no additional bills
will be sent to residential customers.
" Referring to page 5 of the Agreement, paragraph ll, line 4, 14r.
Bloetscher noted the fo/lowing changes within the Blue Book handout
(copy not provided to the Clerk to the Board):
"the residential property owners".
Referring to page 5, paragraph 11, line 6, Mr. Bloetscher noted
that $600,000 should be corrected to $643,200.
Referring to page 6, line 6, Mr. Bloetscher noted the lease period
ia five years instead of four.
Referring to page 6, paragraph 11, the fourth lane from the bot-
tom, the word 'residential' should be inserted.
Cg~m/eelo~r Goodntgh~ mov*d, ~econded by Commissioner S&undera
~ ~1~ ~~ly, to a~r~ the A~nt with
Page
June 16, 1992
Mr. Bloetscher reported that this item is the award of Bid
$92-1843, which tea water line along the eastern boundary of
Longshore Lakes from Immokalee Road to the North Naples Utilities
Water Plant Site. He noted that the low bidder was Gu~ann
Construction Company in the amount of $331,883.00.
Ogmm/~io~er S~anders Boy.d, ~econded by Co~tea/on~r GoodnL~ht
· n~ C~XTte~ unamimonsl¥, to ~atrd Bid $92-1843 to Onym~nn Constrnctton
~ ~ ~e ~t of $~Sl,88~.00.
~ ~ ~ F~ILITI~ ~ ~R QUAIL ~ VI~, ~
Mr. Bloetscher reported that this item Is for water and 8ewer
facilities a~reements for Quail Creek Village, enabling North Naples
Utilities to serve the homes on an interim basis. He added that go
daya from now the agreements will have no value.
~teei~,e~ ~ra moved., ~econ~e~ by ~taalo~r~ ~i~t
43'
Page 18
3une 16, 1992
4,ol2.
Sandra Taylor, Real Property Management Director, reviewed that
Real Property Management is enabling to coordinate policies and proce-
dures to expedite the overall right-of-way acquisition process. She
Informed the Board that these proposed policies and procedures have
been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. She
referred to the details of the Executive Summary regarding this item.
Jennifer E~wards, Assistant to the Oounty Manager, advised the
Board that County Manager Dorrtll has reviewed the proposal and has no
problems with it.
smd ~l~ted~mm~lmo~sl¥, to ~pprovw the propo~d
4~l.~"e~, t.h, el~ ~n~ Rl~olutio~ 92-$42, 92-343 a~d g2-~44.
Page 19
~une ~, ~992
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 23, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication Tiled with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened.
Philip SchefT, Project Planner, reviewed thai the Petitioner pro-
poses the following recommendations:
Limiting res/dent/al development to a maximum of 360 units
over the total PUD, as opposed to 388 units that are presently
approved;
2. Allow a maximum of 60 unite on the temporary sewage treatment
plant 8its;
3. Allow a ~mxtmum of 300 unite on areas adjoining the golf
course.
Mr. Scheff reported that Staff recommends approval of the Petition
· ubJect to the de/et/on of Stipulations G and N, and the addition of
the Petitioner's three recommendations as previously mentioned and as
noted on page 3 of the Executive Summary.
Nilltu Vines pointed out that there had been considerable
>' discussion at the previous meeting to limit the number of unite
'~"f.., adjoining the golf course to 300, which he has included tn his recom-
':' ~' ~e ndat t one.
:' Frail Oaks spoke to this Item.
,, (~.oee) -
Conditienal Ose other than residential would ~ to be &pprov~d by
~ ~, ~ ~t O~/mce 92-41 ~ ~pt~ ~d enter~ into
eee ~ It 4:40 P.M. - ~con~
1992
FOR TZ(~RTAZL BLqC~ - STAY/' DXRZCT]~ TO
N'XT'B ~ FUNDZNG SOURC'~ Bz~XMG ~ II~GZONAL
Tom Conrecode, Director of the Office of Capital Projects
Management, presented several options, and reconunends the addition of
32 parking spaces within the gravel lot currently in Tigertatl Beach
Park and the addition of 100 spaces in an area to the northeast of the
gravel lot. He noted that this ts the most cost effective option, as
any other option would involve purchase.
Gl1Mueller and Andrew Wallach spoke to this item.
Commissioner Shanahan recommended that Tom Clltff further Investi-
gate honoring the City of Naples Beach Parking Stickers at all County
Beaches and look Into Increasing the general parking rate.
clz~tedv~lntmousl~, to Implement Goals ! ind 2 ~lth fundtng tol~
provtd~di~o~z~gton~l p~rktmp~ctf~s.
It.~lE1
~:)I~I~CII 92-$45 &MEIIDZNG R~I~LUTZON C~-91-6 ZN 0RDEIR
IRI~C~I~I~G~IO~I~ERZ~ 1991PR03ECTRETR~E&STJUIDS~)UTR~
~/XT~t'T~ SYSTEM. RESOLUTXOI 92-346/CN~-92-17, AFFROVlIG
Michael Arnold, Utilities Administrator, distributed a handout
which ts a Summary of Assessable Project Costs and Credits for East
and South Naples Sewer Assessments.
Ossmtoolooe~ ~ moved, seconded by Cowmlooiour~ 8oodnitlht
~~ ~lutlm 92-345.
~1~ ~ly, to ~ tb total ~its t~
t~ ~ of b~lo ~J~t ~8to ~
Hr. Arnold noted again for the record that the unit of measurement
ts front footage, except where there Is a special assessment to ~ake
Page 21
June ~6o 1992
service available to a particular parcel.
~tr. Arnold expressed for the record, that the Roll includes cre-
dits for agreements that were entered into in terms of easement
acquisitions, which may show a zero assessment.
fl~ ~ ~li~ ~e~t roll u t~ fill ~~t ~11
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~-~ ~lor~ ~~t ~11 for ~-
~ ~ ~tll~ t~ ~ifo~ ~t~ of collection ~ t~
~t ~lle ~ld ~ ~fi~ to Ancl~e the ~J~te t~t m
~l~ ~ ~ ~ of MJ~te ~ t~ cr~its t~t ~ i~n-
tifi~ ~ ~ ~t ~t~ ~ to District 1 ~ incl~ t~ a~lei-
tis g ~ts ~r~ t~rs ~ ~ ~ zero ~l~ce to ~
69
1992
be~n publteh~d In the I~plu
&fft~lt of
~ti~ f~ ~ g, 1992.
~t t~ ~lutl~ for DistriCt 2 with
for Dl.trtct
3'une 1~, 1992
I~SOT. OTIOI 92-34S/C14~-92-19 APPROVING TH~ lI]l~L AS-ql-qsl~]lT I~0LL FOR
~ AIID BOOT~ M~ SJtIIITARY S~R STBT~[ DISTRICT 3 - ADOPTZD
L~g~l nottcs h~vtng been published in the Naples Dmtl¥ N~ on Nay
12, 1992, ii ~vtdenced by lfft~vlt of ~bltcatton flied .tth the
Cl~rk, ~ltc ~utng ~ c~ttng froa ~e 9, 1991.
~lg ~~ly, to close t~ ~bltc he~tn~.
~.t~ Sars v~, secadg~ Coaisst~er ~tght
~ ~iH ~lwl~, to adop~ the ~olutt~ for Dlltrtct S elth
~ ~ ~lt~la ~tl~ for District 1. thire~ ~opttng ~lutt~
~lge 24
June 16, 1992
(2SS4)
ItF~O~UT~ON 92-349/C~-92-20 APPROVING TH~ FINAL ASSESSWi.q~ ltOLL FOR
EA~T AND ~ NAPLES SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DISTRICT 4 - ADOPTED
Co.l~seloner Saundere ~oved, seconded by Co~.testoner Goodnight
~ C~-Tled ul~ntlo~sl¥, to adopt ~he Resolution for Dtltrtct 4 with
t~ ~ ~tteria atlt~ for Dts~rict 1, there~ adop~tng Resolution
92-349/~-92-20.
Page 25
June 16, 1992
,see I~l~mt~ Clerk I~'ie replace~ Del;mW C~erk
Xt~ ~
~X~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T~ ~L~R ~R T~ Dg~ ~CATX~ OM
~ 1~9 ~ T~ ~I~CA~9 - ~~D
County Attorney Cuyler explained this is a recommendation that the
Board of County Commissioners consider giving notice to the Tax
Collector for tax deed applications on the 1989 county tax cer-
tificates and confirmed this will be an ongoing process. He divulged
there is a total cost of $276,380 which will be recovered through the
tax deed sale. He relayed staff's recommendation to forward a Notice
to Proceed to the Tax Collector for Tax Deed Applications for the
entire 1,063 1989 Tax Certificates held by the County.
Commlslonew Scudders ~OVl~, ~econded I~ Commissioner Goodnlght
8~d ~z~lodunmnlmou81¥, to ~pprove forwarding m Notice to PToceod to
the TmxCollecto~ for Tu Deed&pplicmtion8 for all the 19e9 County
(2510)
B~t"~,~I~Z'AI~ZB]~]rt'AJ~I~7'L'OJLT,/L~..BAS~ NON CASZ NO.
91-~49~-CA..~l-.NT,,B, 14A~ZBON ~T.,~C'L'RZC CO., ZNC. V~. BOAXD mY COOlr'L'Y
Assistant County Attorney Wetgel affirmed this case involves
Madison Elsctrtc Co., Inc., a major contractor Involved in the
construction of the Jail factltty tn the early 80's, and he provided a
legal update of the situation. He revealed the proposed Settlement
Agreement reflects a maximum amount of $200,000 to be paid to the
Plaintiff, M~dlson Electric Co., Inc., $?0,000 of which will be paid
' by Collier County.
County ~anager Dorrill stated the original savings from the Jail
project had gone into what is today Fund 301.
Commtoetoner Shenahanmoved, seconded by Commissioner He~oe and
ca~Flodunmnlmonely, to approvo the Settlement Agreement and Mutual
Rele&o~ mm mi1 u utilization of the Fund 301 reemrveo for the
ps~a~t of t~e County's portion of this settlement.
Page 26
June 16, 1992
Commissioner Vo/pe relayed the request that the Board of County
Commissioners o~pport that certain leg~s]atton which would restore,
p&rt, to loca! governments the ability to regulate tn some way the
fees charged to cable users.
Chester Dobeck spoke to the issue of whether the c&ble tndust~
should be regulated.
Page 27
June 16, 1992
~:' (2021)
~TA~L~T OF P~LXC ]~.RXN~ DAT~ ON TH~ JU]~ 8, 1992, TOURIST
~CO~CXL PLAN - CONN~NSUS TO X~ DXI~ECT ~C TO ~VXEN
OltXg33~AYsJ~FFABDMAKI RKCOJOiKNDATXOIB TO BK PRESKHTKDAT 7/21/92
Commissioner Volpe explained that, pursuant to direction of the
Board of County Commissioners last week, he requested the TDC (Tourist
Development Council) be provided copies of the previous RFP for their
consideration. He relayed some of the concerns which have been
expressed by both members of the TDC as well as the general public.
He recommended eetablishBent of a public hearing date to allow for
public debate on the plan which was adopted by the TDC at itts June
8th meeting.
Commissioner Saunders stated it seems all agree the voters should
have an opportunity to vote on baseball and the question now becomes
one of whether to put it ail in 3¢ and a one ballot question In
November or follow the suggestions of the TDC, i.e. have 2¢ and then
consider the 1¢ Issue separately, thus requiring a special election.
In response to Couissloner Saunders, Assistant County Attorney
Wilson revealed it has previously been determined that a special ale-
ctton could be held at a cost of approximately $100,000.
In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Assistant County Attorney
Wilson stated that If the 2¢ falls the County still gets to keep the
$5,000,000 which will be directed to the uses under the original plan.
Following brief discussion0 Commissioner S~u~ters o~Eot~d
dlr~-t~ the TI~ (Tourist l)evelopeent Council) to reconveys to con-
sider tbs Issue of baseball, that the~ be given m copy of the origins!
]iFf fo1* their co~sidermtton in order to ~ rsccmmrm~tions rel~rdin~
opti~em to I~B ~t~ ~ tho County Attorney"s Office in order tbt
cea report to the ~ of County Commissioners et Itl July 2let
mtn, e~d it m the consensus to ccmply with the reoollm~Zation.
(410)
X~ ~4
BOA]~ OIP OOUITY COSIqXSSXOIIKRSt C08I~NXCATXOWS
Page 28
Sune 16, 1992
Cm~tzeloner Volpe reported receipt of a aeaorandua regarding
revlm~ of the County Mmnager's performance (copy not provided for the
record). Following brtef discussion, he suggested he will prepare a
performance evaluation utilizing certain measurablee for the County
14~na~mr, mad it was the consensus that he proceed to develop the eva-
luatlon form to be coapleted by the Board of County Commissioners.
County Nanager Dorrlll reiterated that the Board of County
Coatsstoners ts aeettng next Monday to take action on 150 zoning
revaluation applications and had re~ested that he keep ~esday'a
~genda short In the event that the zoning reevaluations should be con-
tlnued over. lie began a brief recitation of the contents of Tuesday's
to-date which might preclude continuing the zoning reeva-
luations.
Following brief discussion, it was the consensus to postpone the
150 zoning re~valuatlone from June 22nd until after the Board's
contingent upon advice free the County Attorney regarding the
County Attorney Cu¥1er announced tha~ the Board of County
Commissioners' nesting scheduled for tomorrow night, June l?th, has
-been cancelled and will be readvertleed for June 22nd.
County Manager Dorrtll reported receipt of telephone calls
regarding concerns with respect to drainage resulting from the East
and South County Sewer Assessment Project. He announced that, tn
spite of the assessment rolls being finalized today, staff is lnvestt-
.gating the incidents, one being on Barbizon Lane and the other on
Page 29
3m~.e 16, 1992
92-031, ~ROV~DI~G FOR ABH~S~ O~ LI~, fOR ~g C~T O~
~~ OF ~LZO ~ZS~CI OR ~ 10, B~K 10, HA~IS ~OR
~Z~ ~ZZZ ~ LO~A C~RUZZI ~Rfl O~ R~CORD
Xte~
R~OLOTZO~ 92-~34, FROVIDX~G FOR ASB~SSM:KNT OF LXHN, FOR T]~ COST OF
~ ~~ ~ ~LXC ~ZS~CK 0N L~ 18, BL~ 795, OF A ~T 0F
A ~X~ ~ ~ B~ ~XT ~-FX~, WXA ~MS~T C~TA
~ ~ RZTH JJl31~ B~I~CK:~:~I /~ I~HA~XLXTAT~ ~ PROPERTY
AT ~1 ~ A~r~l'l]~ FOR RENTAL TO X, OIE-XNCON~ FAMXLXI~S
OR Book
June
' ~ AII~IMIIT AID ACCEPTANCE OF COIFI~AICE FOR RIGHT-OP-WAY
AC~qFZIXTXOII ~ TO THI D~SIGN 0Y C.I.E. PROJECT ~0. 022,
IHTISlI/011 ~.~ ~MITA BARBARA BO~ARD - W/TH STIP~%ATION~ DETAILHD IN
RI~IT-OF-I&FFI~MITTING, INSP~CTION, AID ACCEPTARCE OF C.R. 84 RO&D
~ O01~ISTEIT WITH ~TATH ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR
Z-75 -- ~ AID CO~TS MAZV~D ZN THE AMOUNT OF $205
COII~TII~ E~AL S~XCES AGI~A'EMERT W/T~ TUR~ELL AND
AIIO~JkTII, ~1~. TO IMPLIMI]IT MITIGATION 0BLIGATIOR~ FOR
CSlAllgl OLDER IlO. 2 (~IJI&L) TO TH~ CONSTRUCTION COBTR&CT WITH MITCH:KL~-
AID ITAI~E COI~'I~A~=TION CO., INC. FOR ~ II~]OKA~EE ROAD 24" MATER MAIN
PROJECT- ~ C~IlTRACT BY $12,879.27
Item ellD2
H ~ BIO. 2 (FILIAL} TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH MITCHELL
~ ITIIE ~OIUTROF~'I'ION CO., INC. FOR THE C.R* 951 24" WATER MAIN
~ -' ~Jl TI~ ~ OF $0,748.50
See PaGes
~ TO &II:ZIIBIIIT OP.~LGREIMISlTS WITH D~LTOIA ~TILITIES, INC. TO
~ ITITE ~I~,ITII~' .ZN~.. FOR THE COITII~ATION 0r ~ERV/CE ON
BID ~O2-116S POI OOIBTR~GTZON OF MABTIR P~MP STATION l .0S AND 1.07 -
~ TO ~RDIIAL CONTRACTORS, X~., IN THE AWO~IT OF 81,308,850
· m 125
Page 31
June 16, :1992
~ ~F~I'-A~, ~ OF ~ FOR CO~r~fRUCTIOI OF ~ &lid
~A11~ ~ Il I~IL1UICTIOI ~ T~ ~ COO]ITY REGIOIUZ,
~ ~ -- 4~tMtI~D TO T.&. FOJt~B~, ZIC., 1~ 1']!~ ANOUIFf OF
Xtem ~J,~B~ - Omtinued to 6/80/02
'- .limb 4,1~BlO - Geleted
AID COIrS'Z]~ TO ~ B]L'TI4'~ BOA,KD OF CC~IrZ"Y
~,G;.r.I'~R COOIlTT', T'EX DIKP~ OF HIG~I~AY SJLI'rTT JLID
OF FLORX~, A.IID BJ.q. ROll COLLIER CC]~Jt,~Y, FO'.R
COO'IlTY~ ~ 4~}O027 AID I:NSTALLATZC~ OF A ~
OF TANP&, 'rXC.
See Pages
833i MgSl'~fl lllT3filBIOg TO ,f~REIMErf &PFROVI:D BY THI BO&RD OF COUBTT
C~MME~8~R~ Og IJUq'KMBI~ 18, 1990, TO &LLOW F~R ~ PUltC~A~E OF A
~ TRUC~ BY TII OCHOFKI FIRE DI~I'R~'CT
J~OLUT~ ~-836, 1~ RT(IHT-OF"MAY LICENSE AG~K~IK]IT Ii/~/ll"lq~ T. Eli
COUITT KLL"TR~C GOOFKRATI'VE, INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTI'J~ A
age. , 30P
PART OWl OF THI FILTH YIAR RI~f~LI~ AMD 133q~ATIi:Y~
J~MIM&LBXDPRf~:~SMdtXVKD: ~ OR~ER XSSI:F~TO GUll)ri
4~IIleT~ICO~P. TO LXMK THI ~ C'KLL BI:RMB AT THI MAPLI:S T.,AMDI'XLL
- 13JT~8']iNB~ITO~
~ iugBC'ffA~I OB:DKR d'Z92..-O03 11 T'KE AMOOWT OF 07,800 FOR TEl
~ BST IRVX~KB 17XVXSXOII TO t~tOVXDlt ~ llo'r TAP AJrD MITER 9KT -
BUD~TdlJ~IIBMB.WT AUTHORXZXM~ J'J~M FOND 342 TO FROVIDK F~R Till
r, AKIBIB&MJIIATAIDDBA~ MS'FO DOR~J~O rY 91/02 - XWTHI
$88,TO0
1991
No.'8 194/199
Dated 06/01/92
TAII~IXBLI PIRSOJLtL
No. 104/105
Dated 06/01 & 06/19/92
49806, 59358, 36870, 61240, 63266,
FOR SERVICES OFT HI I'~B~XC DIFIIIDtR
, 000
Page 33
Jttne 16, 1992
1'he followLng mLecellaneoue correspondence wee fLled ae presented
the Board of County Conunlos~onere:
Page 34
Sune 16. :1992
See Pages .~o~,-* '~/~='~ .....
FOR TI~ I~IpO~ITIO~ ~ COLL~'F~OII OF A
I=~tOVISZOI OF EI]~IICED E~IERIF~ICT =911" ~
See Pages
There being no further buelnees for the Good of the County,
leering tell,adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 6:00 P.M.
the
BOARD OF COUI~'~ COI~4ISSIONER3
BOARD OF ZONINO APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
as preoented
CHAIRMAN
Or aO col-:rect:e(~
,H 000. ,'132
Page 35