Ordinance 90-074AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE
89-05, AN ORDINANCE ENACTING AND ESTABLISHING cD
A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNT~, ~
FLORIDA PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNME~ ~,.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATION ACT OF 1985 AND CHAPTER 9J-~, ..
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, MINIMUM CRITERI~ ~
FOR REVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPRENENSI%~E ~
PLANS AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE; B4f .~
CORRECTING, UPDATING, AND MODIFYING CERTA~ u
COSTS, REVENUE SOURCES, SUPPORTING POLICIES~ c
AND THE DATES OF CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
ENUMERATED IN THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEARS 1990/91
THROUGH 1994/95; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
F
W~EREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes also
known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-5, Florida
Administrative Code, also known as the Minimum Criteria for Review
of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of
Compliance requires that Collier County correct, update, and
modify costs, revenue sources, or the dates of construction of
facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan
Capital Improvement Element on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared an Annual Update to
the Capital Improvement Element of its Growth Management Plan
(Ordinance No. 89-05) that takes into consideration the plans and
financial resources of the County and of the Agencies of the State
of Florida; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes,
Sections 163.3177(3)(b) and 163.3187(2) provide for annual updates
of local government Capital Improvement Elements that consider
corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue
sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which
are consistent with the plan; or the dates of construction of any
facilities enumerated in the Capital Improvements Element; and
W~EREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a
manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the
correcting, updating, and modifying of certain costs, revenue
sources, and the dates of construction of facilities enumerated in
,OOK 40 P'~ ~8
-1-
I
the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement
Element for capital projects in Fiscal Years 1990/91 through
1994/95 on September 6, 1990 and recommended that it be sub~ltted
to the Board of County Commissioners, as prepared, noting certain
considerations and recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take
action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public
hearing on September 18, 1990; and
~HEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural
requirements of law have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
~: Update of Costs, Revenue Sources and Construction
Dates of Facilities Enumerated in Capital
Improvement Element of Growth Management Plan.
This Ordinance, as described herein, shall be known and
cited as the 1990 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update for
Collier County, Florida. The Collier County 1990 Capital
Improvement Element Annual Update, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, consisting of goals, objectives,
and policies; requirements for capital improvements implementa-
tion; costs and revenues; and implementation programs, shall be
the Collier County Gro~ch Management Plan Capital Improvement
Element Annual Update of 1990 and shall supersede any and all
previous Capital Improvement Elements applicable to the
unincorporated area of Collier County.
~: Severability.
If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent
Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct,
and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion.
-2-
~= Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of
notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been
f~led v~th the Secretary of State.
DATED: September 25, 1990
ATTEST: " " BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
:JAMES C. GILES, CLERK
COLLIER ODUNTY, FLORIDA
',,. /' Maureen~yon
"'J,l~jt.:.Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
MarJo~e-M. Stddent
Assist~nt County Attorney
-3-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second Update
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
Prepare4 by
Growth Management Department
,oo~ 40~ 41
Spring, 1990
ORDINANCE NO. 90-__
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE
89-05, AN ORDINANCE ENACTING AND ESTABLISHING
A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA PURSUANT ,TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
COHPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATION ACT OF 1985 AND CHAPTER 9J-5,
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, MINIMUM CRITERIA
FOR REVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE
PLANS AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE; BY
CORRECTING, UPDATING, AND MODIFYING CERTAIN
COSTS, REVENUE SOURCES, SUPPORTING POLICIES,
AND THE DATES OF CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
ENUMERATED IN THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT ELEMENT
FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEARS 1990/91
THROUGH 1994/95; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes also
known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning an~ Land
Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-5, Florid&
Administrative Code, also known ae the Minimum C'rite=ia for Review
of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of
Compliance requires that Collier County correct, update, and
modify costs, revenue sources, or the dates of construction of
facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Hanagement Plan
Capital Improvement Element on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared an Annual Update to
the Capit&l Improvement E~ement of lee Growth Management Plan
(Ordinance No. ~9-05) that takes into consideration the plane end
financial resources of the County and of the Agencies of the State
of Florida; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 183, Part II, Florida Statutel,
Sections 163.3177(3)(b) end 163.3187(2) provide for annual updates
of local government Capital Improvement Elements that consider
'corrections, updates, and modifications concerning coats; revenue
sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which
ara consistent with the plan; or the dates of construction of any
facilities enumerated in the Capital Improvements Element; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a
manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the
correcting, updating, and modifying of certain colts, revenue
sources, and the dates of col~ructiorl~ facilities enumerated in
-I-
Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement
P-lament for capital projects In Fiscal Years 1990/91 through ;~,
1994/9S on September 6, 1990 and recommended that it be submiCted
to the Board of County Commissioners, as prepared, noting certain
considerations end reco~u~endatlons~ and
W~EREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take
&ctlon in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public
besting on September la, 1990; and
WHEAEAS, all applicable substantiv~ and procedural
r~irs, snts of law have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIIIED
COHNISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAt
BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
Update of Costs, Revenue Sources and Construction
Dates of Facilities Enumerated in Capital
Improvement Element of Growth Hanagement Plan.
This Ordinance, as described herein, shall be known and
cited as the 1990 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update for
Collier County, Florida. The Collier County 1990 Capital
Improvement Element Annual Update, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, consisting of goals, objectives,
and policlesl requirements for capital improvemen}~ implementa-
tiont costs and revenues; and Implementation programs, shall be
the Collier county Growth Management Plan Caplt~l Improvement
Element Annual Update of 1990 and shall supersede any and all
previous Capital Improvement Elements applicable to the
unincorporated area of Collier County.
~= Severab~lity.
If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent
Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct,
and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining porclon.
-2-
~x £ffective Date.
Thil Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of
notice £rom the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been
£11ed ¥~th the Secretary o~ Skate.
. DATED z
~'A~ES C. GI~ES, CT.,L'R]C
., ~aureen Kenyon
,~ Deputy Clerk
,.APProved &l to fora and
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By=
~ax A. Hesse, Jr., chai~a~
N. S[~dant
,Itant County Attorney
BOOK
44
-3-
INTRODUCTION
II.
* Vo
TXBLE OF CONTENTS
VI.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
IMPLEMBNTXTION
Schedules of Improvements
Roads
Drainage
Government Buildings
Recreation & Open Space
Potable Water
Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
COST AND REVENUES
PRO~RAMS TO ENSURE IXPLEHBNTATION
A1TALYSZS (Support Documents)
Public Facility Requirements ..
Capital Improvements Projects
Capital Improvements Financing
Capacity
Public Education & Health
Facilities County Infrastructure
Timing & Location of Capital
Improvements:
Current Local Practices
Financing Plan
Indicates port~ons to be adopted
CIE - L
CIE - 2
CIB- 23
CZ! - 45
eIB - 47
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
~ppendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
I. INTRODUCTION
In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly
strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive
plans. One of the new provisions of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the
requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a capital
improvement element to "... consider the needs for and location
of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida
Statutes).
The capital improvement element (CIE) is supposed to identify
public facilities that will be required during the next five or
more years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources
of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities.
One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that
the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based
on Wstandards to ensure the availability of public facilities and
the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of
service." The administrative regulation that implements the
statutes defines the phrase "level of service" as "... an
indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a
facility based on and related to the operational characteristics
of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity
per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section
9J-5.003(41), Florida Administrative Code).
CIE- I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL
To provide adequate public faoilities concurrent with new
development in order to achieve and maintain or exceed
adopted standards for levels of service.
OBJECTIVE 1.12
Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County
is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each
such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional
public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the
standards.
Policy 1.1.12
The County shall establish standards for levels of service for
three categories of public facilities, as follows:
Category a public facilities are facilities which appear in
other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial
and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable
water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal
facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards
for levels of service of Category A County provided public
facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the
County and to the County's annual budget, and to the
appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The
standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which
are not County provided shall apply to development orders
issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element
of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's
annual budget.
Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's
library, Jail, emergency medical service, other government
buildings, and dependent fire districts. The standards for
levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply
to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development
orders issued by the County.
Category C includes those facilities operated by Federal,
State, and municipal governments, independent districts, and
private organizations. The standards for levels of service of
Category C facilities shall be advisory only, and shall not
apply to the development orders issued by the County or the
County's annual budget.
Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial
furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus,
and library collection materials), design, permitting, and
construction costs. Other "c~tal"~sts, such as motor vehicles
CIE - 2
and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office
furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual
budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes
of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development
orders.
Poli~ 1.1.2~
The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate
existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall
be determined for each public facility by the following calculation:
Q = (s x D) - I.
Where
Q is the quantity of public facility needed,
S is the standard for level of service,
D is the demand, such as the population, and
I is the inventory of existing facilities.
The calculation will be used for existing demand in order
to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will
be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of
future growth. The estimates of projected demand will
account for demand that is likely to occur from previously
issued development orders as well as future growth.
There are three circumstances in which the standards for
levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need
for a public facility:
Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high
hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions
in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future
Land Use Elements of this ~rowth Management Plan.
Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and
repair, remodeling an renovation, will be determined by
the Board of County Commissioners upon the
recommendation of the County Manager.
Public facilities that provide levels of service in
excess of the standards adopted in this Growth
Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any
time as long as the following conditions are met:
the facility does not make financially unfeasible
any public facility of the same type that is needed
to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of
service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and
the facility does not contradict, limit or sub-
stantially change the goals, objectives and
policies of any element of this Growth Management
CIE - 3
Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of
any of the three factors listed in Section B of this Policy shall
be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements
contained in this Capital Improvements Element. All capital
improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved
in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to
the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy.
Policy 1.1.32
The determination of location of improvements to expand public
facilities will take into consideration the projected growth
patterns as identified in the County's annual population
projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will
be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other
governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier
County.
Policy 1.1.42
Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered
in the following order or priority:
Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including
repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that
contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service.
B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing
deficiencies in levels of service.
New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service
for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as
updated by the annual review q~ the Capital Improvements
Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public
facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for
development orders, the capital improvements will be
scheduled in the following priority order to serve:
1. previously approved orders permitting redevelopment,
2. previously approved orders permitting new development,
3. new .orders permitting redevelopment, and
4. new orders permitting new developments.
Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities
that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a
service or facility.
E®
New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service
for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either:
CIE - 4
needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal
years, or
providing higher quality public facilities than are
contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for
such facilities.
Policy
Thm standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be
as follows:
CatsgozT ~ Public Facilities
Al. 1
County Roads
County arterials and collector roads: Level of Service
as indicated" "below on the basis of peak hour, peak
season traffic-volume:
Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads:
Roads
Airport Road
Golden Gate Parkway
Goodlette-Frank Road
Goodlette-Frank Road
Pine Ridge Road
From - To
Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate
Parkway
Airport Road to Santa Barbara
Boulevard
Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate
Parkway
Golden Gate Parkway to US 41
Airport Road to 1-75
A1.2
Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season on all
other County arterial and ~ollector roads, however any
section of road may operate at Level of Service #E" for
a period not to exceed two fiscal years following the
determination of Level of Service "E" in order to
provide the County with time to restore Level of
Service "D" by making appropriate improvements.
Development orders may be issued during the two year
period to the extent their issuance is consistent with
Policies 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 of this Element.
A2
State and Federal Roads~
RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA
1-75 C D
US 41 C D
SR-84 D D
SR-951 - E
SR-29 C -
SR-82 C -
CIE - 5
~3
A4
A3 · 1
A3.2
A4 · 1
A4.2
A4 · 3
AS. 1
A5.2
A5.3
County Surface Water Management Systems%
Future "private" developments - Applicable South
Florida Water Management District requirements found in
Chapter 40E.40.302(4)(a & b), and 40E.-4.091(1)(a)
incorporating by reference Section 3.2.1 et seq.
"Water Quantity" of Basis of Review for Surface Water
Management Permit Applications Within the South Florida
Water Management District, April 1987). (Present
requirements are a 25-year, 3-day storm event except.)
Existing "private" developments and existing or future
public drainage facilities - those existing levels of
service to be identified (by design storm return
frequency event) by April 30, 1989 utilizing the
findings of the completed portions of the Water
Management Master Plan.
County Potable Water Systems%
County systems
135 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for
non-residential
City of Naples = 150 gallons per capita per day
Private potable water systems:
Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy
1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth
Management Plan.
County Sanitary Sewer Systems=
County systems:
100 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for
non-residential
City of Naples = 150 gallons per capita per day
Private sanitary sewer systems:
Sewa.ge flow design standards as identified in Policy
1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth
Management Plan.
;%6
A6.1
A6.2
A6.3
County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities%
1.55 tons of Solid Waste per capita per year
Two years of landfill lined cell disposal capacity at
present fill rates
Ten years of landfill raw_Land capacity at present fill
51
CIE- 6
&7
rates
A7.1
A7.2
A7.3
County Parks and Recreation Facilities;
Regional Park land - 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop.
Community Park land
= 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop.
Recreation facilities
$122.00 capital investment
per capita (at current
cost)
Categor~ B Public Facilities~
B1 County library buildings : 0.33 square feet per capita
County library collection : 1.0 books per capita
B3 County Jail
B4
: 0.0033 beds per capita
B$
County emergency medical : 0.00006 EMS units per
capita service
B6
County other government
buildings
: 2.58 square feet per capita
B6.1
County dependent fire
districts:
Isle of Capri District
B6.2 Ochopee District
Categor]~ C Public Facilities~
C1 Municipal Streets=
C1.1 City of Naples
C1.2 Everglades City
0.00097 apparatus and
stations per capita
0.00057 apparatus and
stations per capita
not to exceed annual average
capacity of "C" for all
streets
annual average of "A" for all
collectors
Federal and State Lands Surface Water Management=
52
CIE - 7
C3
~6
C?
C2.1
C2.2
C3.1
C3.2
C4.1
C5.1
C6.1
C6.2
C7 · 1
C7.2
C7.3
Federal Lands Surface Water Management = to protect
Natural Resources, development allowed will be designed
so drainage will have no adverse impact on resources.
(No measurable standard)
State Lands Surface Water Management - leased lands for
agriculture to have best management practices per clean
water act. (No measurable standard)
Municipal Surface Water Managements
City of Naples = maintain existing level of
se=vice
New development to conform with County surface water
Everglades City
= 10 year - 24 hour storm event
Municipal Potable Water Systems~
Everglades City = 135 gallons per capita per
day, plus 21% for non-
residential
Municipal Sanitary Sewer Systems~
Everglades City = 100 gallons per capita per
day plus 21% for non-
residential
Private Solid Waste Disposal Faoilities~
city of Naples ='[.55 tons per capita.
Everglades City
1.55 tons per capita
Federal and State Parks~
Federal Parks: Everglades National Park, Big
Cypress Preserve - to protect
environmentally sensitive lands.
Boundaries set by legislation.
(No measurable standard)
State Park:
Policy is not to develop more
than 20%. (No measurable
standard)
State Recreation
Area-.
Standard is of no particular
size, physical development
limited to no more than 50% of
land area.
53'
CIE - 8
C9
C7.4
C7.5
C7.6
C8, i
ao
b.
c.
d.
C8.2
State Preserves=
State Museum:
State Ornamental
Garden:
to maintain exceptional objects
to conditions. Physical
development limited to no more
than 5% of land area. (No
measurable standard)
no standard for size
no standard for size
Municipal Parks and Recreation Facilities=
City of Naples:
Community Parks - 2 acres/ 1,000 population
Neighborhood Parks
Beaches
Recreation Facilities
Level of Service Standards:
1. Basketball Courts
2. Baseball Fields
3. Beach Access Points
4. Boat Ramps
5. Bike Trails
6. Community Centers
7. Football Fields
8. Horseshoe Pits
9. Meeting Rooms
10. Pavilions =
11. Picnic Areas =
12. Play Areas =
13. Racquetball Courts =
14. Shuffleboard Courts =
15. Swimming Pools =
16. Tennis Courts
17. Volleyball Courts
I acre / 1,000 population
1 mile /25,000 population
1/ 5,000 population
1/ 5,000 population
1/ 1,000 population
1/ 6,000 population
1/ 1,500 population
1/ 8,000 population
1/10,000 population
1/ 2,500 population
1/ 6,000 population
1/ 5,000 population
1/ 5,000 population
1/ 6,000 population
1/ 2,500 population
1/ 2,500 population
1/25,000 population
1/ 2,000 population
1/ 4,000 population
Everglades City:
Community Parks
Recreation Facilities:
1. Basketball Courts
2. Baseball Fields
3. Bike Trails
4. Community Centers
5. Football Fields
6. Pavilions
7. Picnic Areas
8. Play Areas
9. Tennis Courts
1.25 acres/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
1/534 population
Private Recreation Facilities:
a. No standard in industry
..... %0 54.
CIE - 9
.J
C10
Cll
b. Collier County Usable Open Space Requirement Ordinance
$82-2 Sec. 7.27
Planned Residential Developments -
60% of gross area shall be devoted to usable open
space
Commercial, Industrial, & Mixed Purpose Development
- at least 30% of gross area shall be devoted to
open space
Dedication of usable open space -
Maximum of St of gross project site
Publio Schools:
a. K - 5 Elementary School
b. 6 - 8 Middle School
c. 9 - 12 High School
832 students/building
1100 students/building
2200 students/building
Publio Health Facilities: County Government Buildings
standard of 2.58 sq. ft. per capita includes the County's
public health facilities.
55
CIE - 10 :
FTN~NCTAL FF~STB'rL~TY
OB3ECTZVB 1.2~
Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of
service standards that are within the ability of the County to
fund, or within the County's authority to require others to
provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the
adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues
generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues
received based on economic activity. Future development will bear
a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by
growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but
are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any
public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of
public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special
assessments and taxes.
Policy 1.2.1~
The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities
shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources
that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which
have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required
to enact a source of revenue.
Policy 1.2.2~
Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of
needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some
or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies,
some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities,
and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future
development. Both existing and futura'development may have part of
their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from
other levels of government and independent districts.
Polioy 1.2.3:
Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e.,
potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by
debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services,
or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e.,
reserves, surpluses and current revenue).
Polio~ 1.2.4~
Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads,
surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical
service, jail, other government buildings, and dependent fire
districts) shall be financed from current assets (pay-as-you-go
financing) except as otherwise provided in this policy. Public
facilities financed by non-enterprise funds shall not be financed
by debt unless such borrowing is the only financing technique
available that will enable the County to provide facility capacity
sufficient to meet standards.~r le~s of service concurrent with
CIE - 11
new development. Debt financing shall not be used to provide
excess capacity in non-enterprise public facilities unless the
e&cees capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement
that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of
service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general
obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public
facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five year capital
improvements plan or for excess capacity.
Policy 1.2.5~
The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept
the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is
unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance
costs of the facility.
Policy 1,2,6~
Prior to fiscal year 1989-90, the County shall adopt a revised Road
Impact Fee Ordinance requiring the same level of service standard
as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new
development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance
transportation improvements necessitated by such development.
Policy 1,2.7~
The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and
Recreation and Library facilities requiring the same level of
service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in
order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs
required to finance Parks and Recreation and Library improvements
necessitated by such development.
Polloy 1.2.8z
Prior to fiscal year 1990-91 the Coun~ shall adopt a Stormwater
Run-off Utility Fee System or alternative revenue source in order
to fund drainage facility improvements.
Policy 1.2.9~
The County shall place a referendum before the voters to institute
& general obligation bond for the purchase of Regional Park Land
and facilities if the 7th Cent Sales Tax Referendum fails.
Policy 1.2.10x
The County shall' place a referendum before the voters in November,
1990 to institute the levy of the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge
(Tth Cent). Revenues generated will be used to construct
facilities identified in the CIE Financing Plan through a
combination of bonding and cash flow. Revenue generated in excess
of identified needs in the CIE will be used to provide other
facilities and improvements identified on the referendum ballot
consistent with the requirements of Chapter 212.055(3) F.S.
CIE - 12
Poli~ 1.2.11~
If the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (Tth Cent) is not approved
by the electorate in November, 1990, the County will establish a
County-wide Road Improvement Assessment District in FY90/91 to fund
that portion of County and State road improvements identified in
the Second Annual CIE Update for which the 7th Cent Sales Tax has
been identified in the CIE Financing Plan as the primary revenue
source.
Poliay 1.2.12=
The primary source of funding for CIE Project #400, County Jail,
will be 7th Cent Sales Tax revenue as identified in the CIE
Financing Plan. If the 7th Cent Sales Tax is not approved by the
electorate in November, 1990, a General obligation Bond referendum
will be brought before the electorate for funding of the County
Jail.
Policy 1.2.13]
If, for any reason, the County cannot adopt one or more of the
revenue sources identified in Policies 1.2.6 through 1.2.12 of this
Element and said revenue sources are identified as needed funding
for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital
Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on
one or more of the following actions:
A®
Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or
new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital
Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service
for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years~
Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements
through a plan amendment fadtlity improvements or new
facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a
service or facility but do not provide additional
facility capacity;
Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital
Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an
identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public
facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in
the required annual update.
D®
Lower the adopted level of service standard through a
plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot
be obtained.
E®
Do not issue development orders that would continue to
cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level
of service standard.
Policy 1.2.14s
Collier County will not excee~ max~m ratio of total general
CIE - 13
governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources
of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the
application of revenues to debt service by local taxing
authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed
level of constraint. Current Bondable revenues are ad valorem
taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the
half-cent sales tax. The 13% limitation will not apply to revenues
received by the County from the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge
(7th Cent) if it should be adopted by the Collier electorate to
fund planned or future projects to maintain adopted Level of
Service Standards. The maximum amortization period for bond issues
funded by the 7th Cent Sales Tax will be ten (10) years. The
Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the
financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt
policy.
CIE - ~4
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES ~ COASTAL HIGH
OB~ECTZVE 1.3z
Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the
coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities
needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the
Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall
include the following categories:
A. Maintenance of existing public facilities;
B. Beach, shore an waterway access;
C. Beach renourishment.
Policy 1.3.11
The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high
hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public
facilities identified in the Conservation an Coastal Management
Element.
Policy 1.3.2z
The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the
adopted level of service standards and future growth projections
within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element
limits new residential development (thus obligations for
infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units
per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. In
addition, re-evaluation of existing zoning on unimproved properties
that are inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element will be
undertaken as part of the zoning re-evaluation program specified in
Policy 3.1K of the Future Land Use Element.
Policy 1.3.3~
The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores
and waterways remain available to the public and by December 31,
1992, develop a program to expand the availability of such access
and a method to fund its acquisition.
60
CIE - 15
PROVZDE NEEDED ZMPROVEHENT8
OB~ECTIFff 1.4~
The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions
with its plans for public facility capital improvements by
providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete
or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and
future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued
and new development orders.
Polio~ 1.4.1z
The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the
public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in
the "Requirements for Capital Improvements Implementation" section
of this Capital Improvements Element. The Schedule of Capital
Improvements may be modified as follows:
A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated
annually.
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of
Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any
calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments
of regional impact, and certain small scale development
activities.
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of
Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not
deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for
corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs;
revenue sources; or acceptanc~ of facilities pursuant to
dedications which are consistent with the plan.
Policy 1.4.2z
All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be
consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan.
Polic~ 1.4.3z
The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its
annual budget all the public'facility projects listed in the
Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the
appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have
been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have
been relied upon for the issuance of a building permit. The County
may also include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget
additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B
3) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E).
Policy 1.4.45
Th. County shall determine,~oO~pril~ P,';~t° t~l
issuance of
building
CIE - 16
permits, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A
public facilities to met the standards for levels of service for
existing population and the proposed development. No building
permit shall be issued by the time mandated for the adoption of
land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S.,
including any amendments thereto unless the levels of service for
the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy
1.1.5, Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management
as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element
are met.
CIE - 17
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
OBJECTIVE 1.5~
In order to coordinate land use decisions and facility planning by
the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations
pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments
thereto, the County shall adopt a "Concurrency Management System"
Ordinance for the scheduling, funding and timely construction of
Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to
development in order to achieve and maintain adopted standards for
levels of service, and to exceed the adopted standards when
possible.
Polio~ 1,5,1:
Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through
September 30, 1994, the concurrency requirement for the Potable
Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation and
Open Space Level of Service Standards, of this Growth Management
Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an
established Concurrency Management System are met:
A®
The required facilities are in place at the time a
building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued
subject to the condition that the necessary facilities
will be in place when the impact of the development
occurs.
Bm
The required facilities are under construction at the
time a building permit is issued.
The required facilities are 'the subject of a binding
contract executed for the construction of those
facilities at the time a building permit is issued.
The construction of required facilities has been included
in the County's adopted budget at the time a building
permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet
the subject of a binding contract for their construction.
Es
The construction of facilities required to accommodate
the im'pact of development occurring before October 1,
1994 is scheduled in the County's Schedule of Capital
Improvements prior to October 1, 1994. The Schedule of
Capital Improvements shall be based on a realistic,
financially feasible program of funding from existing
revenue sources and shall be adopted as a part of this
Growth Management Plan.
A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or
delay construction of any Category A facility in the
Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to
maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any
development order issued pursuant to a concurrency
finding under this section is expressly conditional so
that the permit shall be suspended and no further
development shall be carried out in the event any of
the following occur without a corresponding plan
amendment:
The required facilities are delayed, deferred, or
removed from the adopted Schedule of Capital
Improvements.
b. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the
Schedule of Capital Improvements.
Ce
Construction of the required facility or facilities
is not undertaken in accordance with the adopted
Schedule of Capital Improvements.
The construction of required facilities scheduled in the
County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October
1, 1994 will not be delayed, deferred or removed from the
Capital Improvement Element if the facilities have been
relied upon for issuance of a development order.
Policy
Effective October 1, 1994, the concurrency requirement for the
Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation
and Open Space Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management
Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an
established Concurrency Management System are met:
A®
The required facilities are ia'place at the time the
building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued
subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will
be in place and operational when the impacts of the
development occur.
Ce
The required facilities are under construction at the time
a building permit is issued.
The required facilities are the subject of a binding
contract executed for the construction of these facilities
at the time a building permit is issued.
De
The construction of required facilities has been included
in the County's adopted budget at the time a building
permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the
subject of a binding contract for their construction.
Polioy 1.$.3.'
Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through
September 30, 1994, the concurrency requirement of the Traffic
CIE - 19
Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth Management
Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an
established Concurrency Management System are met:
ae
The required facilities are in place at the time a building
permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to
the condition that the necessary facilities will be in
place when the impacts of the development occur.
B. The required facilities are under construction at the time
a building permit is issued·
The required facilities are the subject of a binding
contract executed for the construction of these facilities
at the time a building permit is issued.
De
The construction of required facilities has been included
in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the
time a building permit is issued even though the facilities
are not yet the subject of a binding contact for their
construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of
any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS below the
adopted standard (i.e., LOS standard is "D" peak hour, peak
season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak
season).
The construction of the facility required to accommodate
the impact of development occurring before October 1, 1994
is included in the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or
the County's current five (5) year Capital Improvement
Schedule adopted as a pat of this Growth Management Plan
prior to October 1, 1994. A plan amendment is required to
eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project
in the Schedule of capital Improvements which is needed to
maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any
development order issued pursuant to a concurrency finding
under this section is expressly conditional so that the
permit shall be suspended and no further development shall
be carried out in the event any of the following occur
without a corresponding plan amendment:
The required facility is delayed, deferred, or removed
from the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the
Schedule of Capital Improvements.
2. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the Schedule
of Capital Improvements.
Construction of the required facility or facilities is
not undertaken in accordance with the County's adopted
Schedule of Capital Improvements or the State's Five
(5) Year Work Prog~.
CIE - 20
The construction of required facilities scheduled in the
County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October
1, 1994 will not be delayed, deferred or removed from the
Capital Improvement Element if the facilities have been
relied upon for issuance of a development order.
Policy 1.5.4z
Effective October 1, 1994, the concurrency requirements of the
Traffic Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth
Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of
an established Concurrency Management System are met:
The required facilities are in place at the time a building
permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to
the condition that the necessary facilities will be in
place when he impacts of the development occur.
B. The required facilities are under construction at the time
a building permit is issued.
The required facilities are the subject of a binding
contract executed for the construction of these facilities
at the time a building permit is issued.
De
The construction of required facilities has been included
in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the
time a building permit is issued even though the facilities
are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their
construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of
any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS below the
adopted standard (i.e., LOS standard is "D" peak hour, peak
season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak
season).
Em
The construction of the required facility is included in
the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the County's
current five (5) year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted
as a part of this Growth Management Plan and:
The Board of County Commissioners have made an express
finding, after a public hearing, that the current five
(5) year capital improvement schedule is based on a
realistic, financially feasible program of funding from
existing revenue sources; and
The level of service (LOS) on all roads serving the
development will not, at any time, operate below peak
hour, peak season LOS "E"; and
The level of service (LOS) on any road serving the
development will not operate at peak hour, peak season
LOS "E" for a perio~of moA~ than two (2) years; and
CIE - 21
e
A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or
delay construction of any road project in the Schedule
of Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the
adopted level of service standard. Any development
permit issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under
this section is expressly conditioned so that the
permit shall be suspended and no further development
shall be carried out in the event any of the following
occur without a corresponding plan amendment:
The required facility is delayed, deferred or
removed from the five (5) year capital improvement
schedule or the State's five (5) year work program;
Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the five
(5) year capital improvement schedule or the
State's five (5) year program;
The level of service on any road serving the
development operates below peak hour, peak season
LOS "E";
The level of service on any road serving the
development operates at peak hour, peak season LOS
"E" for a period of more than two (2) years; and
Construction of the required facility or facilities
is not undertaken in accordance with the five (5)
year capital improvement schedule or the State's
five (5) year work program.
Polioy 1.$.$z -'
On or before the time mandated for the adoption of land development
regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any
amendments thereto, the County shall implement, through the
adoption of an ordinance, a Concurrency Management System and a
monitoring program.
CIE - 22
SCHEDULE OF C~PZTAL IMPROVEMENTB
The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will
eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out
facilities, and make available adequate facilit~es for future
growth.
Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the
next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000).
Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service
standards as identified within this element and the appropriate
indi¥idual element of this Growth Management Plan.
Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service
standards as identified within this element. Optional elements
were not developed for Category B facilities.
BODK
CIE - 23
~=oJect
1
2
3
8
10
11
111th Avenue North
US 41 - Vanderbilt Drive
I miles: replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanes
Airport Pulling Road (C1~-31) (COI(PLETED}
Radio Road - Golden-Gate
Parkway: 1.4 miles: add 2
lanes
Airport-Pulling Road
US 41 - Radio Road
1.8 miles: add 2 lanes
Davis Boulevard (SR-84)
Santa Barbara Boulevard -
County Barn Road
1.4 miles: add 2 lanes
Golde~ Gate Parkway (CR-886)
CR-851 - CR-31
1.6 miles: add 2 lanes
Immokalee Road (CR-846)
CR-31 - 1-75
3.5 miles: replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanes
Immokalee Road (CR-846)
1-75 - CR-951
3.4 miles: replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanes
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951)
US 41 - Rattlesnake Hammock
Road: 3.4 miles: replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951)
SR-84 - Rattlesnake Hammock
Road: 3 miles: replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
352
2486 1980
110
4879 1200
55OO
5390
1100
1045 374
To~al
352
4466
110
6079
5500
4978 6397
5390
5203 6303
C~TEGORY A
ROAD PRC)~EC~B ~
COLLIEItCOONT~ S-t':'~t,R C:M'ITAr., IKI'R~8 ~
$(ooo)
90-9~ 9~-92 92-93 ~3-94 94-~5 Total
3.2
13
17
19
2O
21
Isles of Capri Road (GR-gS1) 165
US 41 - Marco Bridge
R-of-W Acquisition
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951) (COHPLETED)
23rd Ave. S.W. - Golden Gate
Blvd.: 2.8 miles: replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) 3630
US 41 - CR-31
2 miles: add 2 lanes
Radio Road 5973
CR-31 - Santa Barbara
Boulevard: 3 miles; replace
2 lanes; add 2 lanes
Radio Road 270
Santa Barbara Boulevard -
SR-84:1.5 miles: replace 2
lanes;add 2 lanes
Rattlesnake Hammock Road ~ 1650
US 41 - County Barn Road
2 miles: replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanes
Goodlette Frank Road (CR-851) 1980
Carica Road - CR-846
2.5 miles: build 2 lanes
Gulf 5hore Drive (DELETED)
Vanderbilt Beach Road
111th Ave. 1.3 miles: add 1
lane
Livingston Road (North)
CR-846 - Imperial ST+EW Conn.
6.2 miles: build 2 lanes
(COMPLETED)
1100
550 2200
3850
165
4730
5973
3020
5500
1980
C~LTB43OR¥ &
ROAD PRO~ECT8 .'
Project
22
23
24
~26
~27
28
31
32
Santa Barbara Blvd./Logan
Green Canal - Pine Ridge
Road: I mile: replace 2
lanes; add 2 lanes
Vanderbilt Beach Road
US 41 - CR-31
2.2 miles: build 2 lanes
Vanderbilt Beach Road
Oaks - CR-951
2.9 miles: build 2 lanes
Vanderbilt Drive (CR-901)
111th - Bonita beach Road
3.9 miles: replace 2 lanes;
add 2 lanes
Westclock Road
Carson Road - SR-29
I mile: build 2 lanes
Hajor Reconstruction
in-house major road
reconstruction at various
locations
Traffic Signals
major installation at
various locations
Bonita Beach Road
Vanderbilt Drive to County-
line: 1.7 miles: add i lane
(1/2 in Lee County)
Santa Barbara Boulevard
Davis Blvd to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road: 2 miles: build
4 lanes
(COMPLETED)
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
688 2310
5945
(DEFERRED) 550 1650
952
2998
5945
2200
952
850 497 307 630 628 2912
506 764 490 605 630 2995
550 880 2750
968 3575
4180
4543
CATEGORY A
ROAD PROJECTSI
Pro~ec~
33
34
35
~c-,36
9
4O
41
County Barn Road
Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road: 2 miles:
build 4 lanes
Advanced ROW Acquisition
Carson Road
Lake Trafford Road to
Immokalee Drive - 0.6 miles;
add 2 lanes
New North-South Road
CR-858 to CR-846, 5.7 miles;
2 lanes
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951)
Golden Gate Blvd. to CR-846,
3.0 miles; add 2 lanes
Pedestrian Overpass on SR-29
at Farmworkers Village
Airport-Pulling Road
Golden Gate Parkway to Pine
Ridge Road, 2.6 miles; 6
laning including grade
separation at Golden Gate
Parkway
Goodlette-Frank Road
Golden Gate Parkway to
Solana Road, 1.7 miles;
6 laning
Pine Ridge Road
Airport Road to 1-75, 2.0
miles; 6 laning
(COHPLETED)
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
363 682
3190 4235
200 200 200 200 200 1000
512 512
528
4290
3751 3751
550
4818
55O
308
330 2431 2761
550 2200 3058
42
V&nderb~lt Beach Roa~
US 41 to Gulfshore Drive
1.4 miles; 4 laning
440 3080
3520
COUNTY ROADS SUBTOTAL
45756 19590 12063 13909
15577 106895
ROAD ~'ROJECTSa COLLIER CO~HTY 5-YEAR CaPITaL 'IHPA~ ~.WWlmT ,~'$(000)
ProJeot 9C-91 '9Z-92 92-93
93-94 94-95 Total
44 (DEFERRED)
43 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) 470 6700 3500
Davis Boulevard to Airport
Road
Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Grade separation at Pine
Ridge Road
45 Tamiami Trail North-(US 41) 1515 5609
Immokalee Road to Laurel Oak
Drive
46 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) 1196 4428 5624
9
50
51
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road to
Barefoot WMS. Road
Tamiami Trail East (US 41)
Airport Road to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road
Davis Boulevard (SR-84)
Airport Road to Kings Lake
Boulevard
David Boulevard (SR-84)
Kings Lake Boulevard to
County Barn Road
Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Immokalee Road to Wiggins Pass
SR 951
New York Drive to Marco Bridge
(DELETE) *
(DELETE)*
4100
10679
7124
678 2509 3187
595 500 2200 3295
7600 11700
STATE ROADS SUBTOTALS 4100 4454 17309 15737 0 41600
TOTALS 49856 24044 29372 29646 15577 148495
Note:
To be funded in the revised FDOT S-year work program with revenue from t~e additional 4 cent gas
tax enacted by the 1990 Legislature.
CATEGORY &
DRAIN*AGE PROO*ECTB ~
ProJ eot
co~ga com~ s-~ c~~~ ~~ ~
90091 91-92 92-.93 93-94
200
201
202
.,~03
204
205
Master Plan, Basin Plans
County-wide Master Plan
District No. 6
Series of canal and/or
structure modifications
and/or construction
improvements
Cocohatchee River Canal
series of canal and/or
structure modifications
and/or construction
improvements
Gordon River Extension
Series of canal and/or
structure modifications
and/or construction
improvements
Other Drainage Projects
Series of canal and/or
structure modifications
and/or construction
improvements in planning
districts 1,3,5,7 & 8.
Land and Environmental
Purchase of land for the
indirect requirements of
the location of drainage
canals/structures.
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
94-95 To~al~ "'
C~TEGOR¥ A
DRAZI~GH ~ROJEC~H 1
~ro~eot
291
District No. 6 (Lely)
Basin Plan and series of canals
and/or structure improvements
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 TO,aX
292
Gordon River Extension
Basin Plan and series of canals
and/or structure improvements
224 2414 3260 1925 1293 9116
293
~'294
Cocohatchee River System
Aerial Mapping and Basin Plan
Hain Golden Gate System
Aerial Mapping and Basin Plan
Henderson Creek Basin
Detailed engineering/environmental
Basin Plan
Fake-Union Basin
Aerial Mapping and Basin Plan
300 1860 5956 8116
260
315 320
105 160
297 Southern Coastal Basin
Aerial Mapping and Basin. Plan
260
298 Barton River Basin
Aerial Mapping
160
635
160
265
53 180 233
53 53
1099 2894 3365 3998 7482 18838
· '": P~o:Jeo~: 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 To,il
301 Lely/East Tamiami EMS (COMPLETED)
Station and Vehicle:
Lely/East Tam,ami Trail area
302 Golden Gate Parkway 326 326
EMS Station and Vehicle:
Golden Gate Parkway - Airport
Road
303 System Status Float Unit 326 326
304 EMS Statio~ and Vehicle: 326 326
~ Location to be determined
~ based on need
400
Jail Expansion
Increase of jail beds at
Naples Jail Center
EMS Total 326 326 326 978
8800 8800
i
CATEGORY A
LIBRARY BUILDINGS PROJECTB~
Project
mmmmmmmm mmmmm.
COLLIEH COONT~ 5-1'E]L~ CAPIT'-~L ZMPROFEHENTB ELEMENT
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94
$(ooo)
94-95
500
501
502
503
,~05
Headquarters Addition -
26,575 sq. ft. addition
East Naples Branch
Construction of 6600 sq.ft.
branch library
Collier North Branch
1500 sq.ft, addition
Harco Island Branch
3300 sq.ft, addition
Library HQ Renovation
Renovate/remodel upon
completion of Project
#500
Immo~alee Branch
2000 sq.ft, addition
Golden Gate Branch
2000 sq.ft, addition
Vineyards Branch Library
9000 sq.ft. Branch Library
(DELETE)
2845 505
25
279 35
25 354
25 254 35
10 331 55
68
995
Library Buildings Total
550
Library Collection
Keep book stock @ I book per
capita
Total
3350
314
379
314
421
1063
2870 844 974 158 995 5841
391 248 248 248 248 1383
CATEGORY ~
~OVE~.,NM~ BU~LDXN~S PROJECT~
Pro~ect
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
600
603
:%04
New Courthouse
69,000 sq.ft, finished;
finish additional 46,000 sq.ft.
in FY 91
601 New Health Building
50,000 sq.ft, finished +
25,000 sq.ft, unfinished to
house health related
activities, Social Services,
Veterans Services and Public
Services Administration
Building B Renovation
Renovation of existing
structure for BCC Boardroom,
Minutes and Records
Building W Expansion
15,000 sq.ft, expansion of
warehouse + day care facility
New Agriculture Center
12,000 sq.ft, new structure
for agricultural activities/
emergency operating center
607 Development Services
40,000 sq.ft, new structure
to house building permitting
activities and other County
functions
608 Building C Addition
2,300 sq.ft, addition for
computer and admin.
(COMPLETED)
(DELETE)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
3720
1100
2100
3720
2100
1100
TOTALB
4820 2100 0 0 0 6920
Non-CIE project
CUtTEGORY A
PARKS PROJECTf3 ~
Pro~ect
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 TOtal
7OO
701
702
~03
5
706
707
708
709
710
711
Amphitheater
New structure in North Naples
Community Park
Bicycle Trails
46.2 miles of paved trails
linking to schools or
existing trails
6th Community Park - Phase I
Land & Phase I facilities
(32 acres)
Community Parks - Phase II (5)
Phase II of Community Park
facilities for Immokalee, Marco,
East Naples, Golden Gate &
North Naples
Community Pool
25 meter pool in I]~okalee
Multi-purpose Facility
Wood floor, baskets, bleachers
and locker room facilities
Jogging Trails
3 miles, unpaved
Regional Park Land
700 acres of land only
Olympic Pool
50 meter pool, deck grandstand,
locker room facilities
Track and Field
Full size equipped track
Boat Ramps
12 two lane ramps, parking,
rest rooms, lights, landscaping
7th Community Park - Phase I & II
Land & Phase I & II facilities
(32 acres)
100
289 289 260 277
992 1474
2018 2821 564 1118
170
937
11
1300
25
2000
2300
386
100
589
25 25
386
2194
191
387
1471
100
1115
2466
6521
600
1300
75
2170
2300
191
2096
3765
712
8th Community Park - Phase I & II
Land & Phase I & II facilities
(32 acres)
100
TOTALS 4406 10806 4018 3569
94-g$ TOtaX
2194 2294
2194 24993
CATEGORY
1rATER PRO~ECTS ~
Project
8O3.
8O2
8O3
8O4
8O5
~806
811
812
S13
815
816
81'7
818
Rattlesnake Hammock Road 20"
6560 L.F. of 20" Water Main
County Barn Road 16"
5900 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Davis Boulevard 16"
11070 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Davis Boulevard 20"
2640 L.F. of 20" Water Main
91st Avenue 12" Intercon.
200 L.F. of 12" Water Main
7th Street 12" Intercon.
100 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Audubon County Club 16"
5230 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Carica Road Pumping
Storage Tank Pumping
Facilities
Carica Road Tank
Water Storage Tank and Land
replacement costs to Naples
Land for North Reg.
Treatment land acquisition
Coral Reef Wellfield Study
~adio Road 12"
2430 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Pine Ridge Road 16"
5280 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Goodlette Road Extension 16"
10560 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Seagate Drive 12'"
2640 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Airport Road 16"
10,560 L.F. of 12" Water Main
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total ~
¢CO~L~ED)
(COMPLETED)
C COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
!
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
90-91 91-92 92-93
819
820
821
823
824
~2S
826
:o "828
83O
831
832
833
834
Zm.mokalee Road 12"
2000 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Zmmokalee Road 16"
3500 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Vanderbilt Drive 16"
5840 L.F. of 16" Water Main
CR-951 12"
23700 L.F. of 12" Water Main
CR-952 12"
5500 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road 20"
7920 L.F. of 20" Water Main
6th Street 12"
6600 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Gulfshore & Vanderbilt 16st
12585 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Coral Reef Wellfield Phase I (DELETE)
Phase I of Master Plan Project
North County Reg. Treatment 1
Plant
Construction of North County
Regional Water Treatment Plant
Immokalee Road 36" (DELETE)
10560 L.F. of 36" Water Main
CR-951 36"
10560 L.F. of 36" Water Main
Immokalee Road 24"
7920 L.F. of 24" Water Main
Immokalee Road 20"
5280 L.F. of 20" Water Main
Quail creek PUD 16"
7920 L.F. of 16" Water Main
(COH~LETED)
268
1126
4415
892
670
370
450
$(o0o)
93-94 94-95
268
1126
4415
892
670
370
450
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJECTS:
COLLIER COUNTY $-YEltlt CILPIT]LL IHPR~ EL~fB~T
835
836
837
838
839
~40
841
846
847
848
849
850
851
Immokalee Road 16"'
2640 L.F. of 16" Water Main
I~mokalee Road 12"
5280 L.F. of 12" Water Main
Livingston Road Extension 16mm
23600 L.F. of 16" Water Main
1.5 MG Elevated Tank
Old U8 41 16'~
1800 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Pine Ridge Road 16"
7920 L.F. of 16" Water Main
Davis Boulevard 16"
6450 L.F. of 16" Water Main
5 HG Ground Tank
Storage Tank & Pumping
Facilities at Collier DRI
12" Hain at Pine Ridge Road
8000 L.F. of 12" Water Main
12" Main at Pine Ridge Road
2800 L.F. of 12" Water Main
12" Water Main at US 41
6000 L.F. of 12" Water Main
12" Water Main at Immokalee
Road
5280 L.F. of 12" Water Main
12" Water Hain at US 41
8300 L.F. of 12" Water Main
North County Wellfield -
Phase II
Golden Gate Wellfield
Expansion
Raw Booster Station
(DELETE)
$(°oo)
90-91 93.-92 92-93 93-94 94-95
1210
19 205
183
363
1217
125
120
7O
55
7O7
T~tal
183
363
1217
1335
120
445
359
375
304
1471
1471
224
707
26 283 309
C~TL~ORY A
~ATER PRO~ECTS ~
Project
853
854
~jB55
I
~[7
859
86O
852 20" Main on Goodlette Road
Extension
10560 L.F. of 20" Main
16" Loop Main on Palm Drive
11450 L.F. of 16" Main
20" Main - US 41 North
8000 L.F. of 20" Main from
Immokalee Road to Wiggins
Pass
12" Main on Ra~io Roa~
21120 L.F. of 12" Main
between Commercial Drive
and Davis Blvd.
16" Main - Livingston Roa~
to Wyn~emere
8000 L.F. of 16" Main from
Pine Ridge Road to
Wyndemere
16" Ma~n on Santa Barbara
5280 L.F. of 16" Main from
Davis Blvd. to Radio Road
858 36" Main on CR-951
15840 L.F. of 36" Main from
Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake
N. County Treatment Plant
Expansion
Add 4 MGD of capacity
Aquifer Storage & Recovery
Up to 4 MGD storage for
peak season
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
696
687
600
57 264
982
480
800 4000
380 2196
500 450
696
687
600
982
480
321
2576
4800
450
TOTALS
1§413 6270 819 4231
283 27016
SEWER PROJECT8 z
COLL'rER COOHTY 5-~ C2~ :[If~'ROV'BHZh'T8 B:LEH:EIIT ..! $(000)
9O3.
c006
8
91.0
North County Expansion
Design & Construction of
Wastewater Facility and
Effluent Disposal
902 East and South Naples
Collection System
Construction of the Facility
904 South County Reg. Treatment
Facility
U~ility A~ministration (DEFERRED)
Building
Design and Construction
Bouth County Pump, Mains &
Disposal
~ Pump Station, Transmission
~ Mains and Effluent Disposal
System
8" Force Main
Pump Station 15 to Pump ~
Station 20
10800 L.F. of 8" Force Main
909 12" Force Hain
Pump Station 19 to Pump
Station 20
11300 L.F. of 12" Force Main
10" Force Hain - Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED)
Pump Station 11 to Santa
Barbara
2400 L.F. of 10" Force Main
Davis Blvd. Pump Station No.ll
Design and Construction
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
140 712
220 1177
100 500
852
600
C~TEGORY A
8EWER PROJECTS
COLL'rER C00'~1~ 5-~'E]kR C~PZTAL IIII~OFEMENTB ~
ro]eat
$(ooo)
920
912 10" Force Main Davio BXvd.
Pump Station 14 to Pu~p
Station 11
7800 L.F. of 10" Force Main
913 Davis Blvd.
Pump Station No. 14-
Design and Construction
914 20'" Force Main CR-951/UB 41
Pump Station 18 to Pump
Station 1
11400 L.F. of 20" Force Main
Pump Station No. 18
Design and Construction
Bouth County Reg. Treatment
Facility Expansion
Design and Construction of
4 MGD Facility Expansion
North County Reg. Treatment
Facility Expansion
Design and Construction of
2 MGD Facility Expansion
918 20" Force Hain
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road -
CR-951 to Polly Avenue
11400 L.F. of 20" Force Main
919 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road
Pump Station 20 - Design and
Construction
Pump Station No. 16
CR-951 - Design and
Construction
(COI(PLETED)
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Total
100 500
100 502
100 500
1800 8876
500 2607
100 502
100 500
100 500
600
602
600
10676
3107
602
600
6OO
i
CATEGORY
SEWER PRO~ECTS
COLLIER COUNTY 5-1'E;]~, ~]kP~ ZMPP. OVEMENTB ELEMENT
~(ooo)
~ro~ect
921
922
923
i W925
26
927
928
12'" Force Main
CR-951 - Pump Station 16 to
Pump Station 18
10800 L.F. of 12" Force Main
North County Pump Station
Telemetry System - Radio
Telemetry System
North County Rastewater
Treatment Plant Operations
Building
Office and Laboratory
North County
Master Pump Station 1.10
Pelican Bay Improvement District
47520 L.F. of Force Main and 2
Pump Stations
Immokalee Road Sewer/Effluent
System
Force Main & effluent line from
N. Plant to Quail Creek
Master Pump stations 1o03 & 1.07
2 pump stations on Immokalee Road
24~* Force Hain from 1o06 to 1o07
20,000 L.F. of Force Main from
Airport Road to Orange Blossom
Drive
90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 TOtal
321
2720
TOTALS
3950
1336
1440
13127 16876 0 0
321
2720
3950
1336
1440
30003
L&~HDFTLL PRO~ECTf3~ COLLTER COUHTT S-~'E]t.R C3t.l)~ []:]~)~S ~LZJfZ~T $(000)
Pro~ect 90-9L 9L-92 92-93 93°94 94-95 Total
(COMPLETED)
1000 Naples Landfill Expansion
Provide for future site
availability beyond 1994
1001 Leachate Treatment Plant
Provide for collection,
treatment and disposal
from Naples landfill
1002 Naples Landfill
Cell #6, Phase II
Design and Construct Liner;
prepare Phase II, Cell 6
1003 Naples Landfill
Cell $6, Phase III
Design and Construct Liner;
~ Prepare Phase III, Cell 6
r~004 Naples Landfill
Closure of Cells $3 and $4
in accordance with DER Permit
requirements
1005 Naples Landfill
Cell $6, First Lift 8.26 acres
1006 Naples Landfill
Develop 300 acres future cells
446 446 446 446 446
1650
1800
50 1425
1280
2466 4976
1871 446 446
TOTALS
2230 '
1475
1650
1800
1280
1770
10205
COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPB OIP PUBLIC
In the table below, the left colp~n itemizes the types of public
facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the
5-year amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a
calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. Ail
deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is
the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay
for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of
service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5.
COUNTY ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS
LESS Available Revenues:
Constitutional Gas Tax $ 2,366,000
County Gas Tax 5,661,000
Local Option Gas Tax 16,895,000
Road Impact Fees 31,834,000
Deficit
$106,895,000
56.756.000
( 50,139,000)
<% STATS ROADS NETWORK
.~!~LESS Available Revenues:
~ ..... ' FDOT 5-year Work Plan
i*' Developer Contributions
DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS
LESS Available Revenues:
Stormwater Utility
Bonds*
Carry Forward
SEWER SYSTEMS
Systen Development Fees
4,865,000
1,000,000
DefiCit
18,638,000
200,00~
Balance
Balance
41,600,000
5.865.00O
( 35,735,000)
18,838,000
57,019,000
-- 0
~ SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL
~..LESS Solid Waste User Fees
l*'-z2uu~ I RZC~TZON
i'~?~LESS Available Revenues:
Park Impact Fees
Boating Improvement
Program
Developer Contribution
(Land)
Carry Forward
* £'~bJeot to BCC adopti[~i
Balance
14,563,000
1,131,000
768,000
6,065,000
Deficit
90
10,205,000
-- 0
24,993,000
2,466,000)
CIE - 45
':~](~gENC'~' XEDICAL SERVICB
HOUSINg
Buildings
Collection
Reset. for Impact Fee Eligible
Total L~bra~ Costs
Library Impact Fee
Trust Fund
Carry Forward
6,581,000
197,000
2,517,000
Available Revenues:
State Funds for
Agriculture Building
Carry Forward
Dzs zc
' Imle of Capri
· Ochopee
99,000
3,812,000
~tot&l Deficit of Restricted Revenue vs.
Deficit
Deficit
Deficit
$( 978,000)
(8,800,000)
5,841,000
1,383,000
4.468.000
11,692,000
Deficit
(2,397,000)
6,920,000
Balance
(3,009,000)
Costs
Unrestricted Revenues:
Ad Valorem Taxes (1
Mill Capital
Revenue Fund)
7th Cent Sales Tax
(Bonds & Cash Flow)
6,850,000
(103,524,000)
96,674,000**
Balance
The Board of County Commissioners has adopted the following
alternative revenue policies should the 7th Cent Sales Tax not
pass at referendum in November, 1990:
Pro%ect Type
1.County & State Roads
Deficit
2.Jail Housing
3.Regional Park Land
Revenue Source
Co-wide Road Improvement
Assessment District
G.O.B. Referendum
G.O.B. Referendum
Amount
$ 85,874,000
8,800,000
2.000.O00
Total
$ 96,674,000
CIE - 46
PR RAMS TO EN'URE IMPLEMENTATION
By the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations
pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto,
~ppropriate land development regulations will be adopted and the
following programs will be implemented to ensure that the goals,
objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvements Element
will be achieved or exceeded.
'.S~. Bu~ld~na Permit Review
As part of the review of all applications for building permits, the
County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity
of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of
service for the existing population and for the proposed development in
accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System.
2. Development Order Review
· As part of the review of requests for all development orders having
,negative impacts on Category A Public Facilities other than building
permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of
Category A public facilities is planned for completion concurrent with
the impacts on levels of service that will be created hy the proposed
development during the next five fiscal years.
S. Xmmaot Fees
Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of
~i service as is required by Policy 1.1.5.
'~..~'..4. ~ ~nnual Budaet
: ':The armual budget will include in its capital appropriations all
'./<projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for
expenditures during the next fiscal year.
§. Semiannual ReDort
The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs
concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies,
developments of regional impact and selected small developments will
report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in
the Capital Improvements Element.
~. ~Ddate o~ Capital Improvement Element
The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to
meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process.
Beginning in April of each year, the element will be updated in
conjunction with the County's[~o§Kbud~_9(;~:ro~ and the release of the
CIE - 47
'/Official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will
~nclude~
1. Revision of population projections;
2. Updates of facility inventory;
Update of unit costs;
e
Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year
needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet
the service standards.
Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial
feasibility and the County's ability to finance capital
improvements needed to meet the service standards.
Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next
five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be
incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st.
7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis.
In addition to the annual update, the County will perform an assessment
of the status of the Capital Improvement Element in November of each
year in conjunction with the release of the preliminary BEBR population
estimates and projections. This analysis will include an assessment of
the status of capital projects funded during the prior fiscal year along
with an assessment of existing and projected service levels versus the
edopted standards.
7, ... ¢~ncurrencv Mana~ementSYstem
The County shall establish by ordinance and maintain a Concurrency
Management System. The system shall consist of the following
components:
Annual monitoring report on the capacity and levels of service
of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of
service adopted in Policy 1.1.5. of this Element. The report
shall summarize the actual capacity of existing public
facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned
public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal
years. For the purposes of long range capital facility
planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity
will also be done. These forecasts will be based on the most
recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this
Capital Improvement Element. This annual report will
constitute the evidence of the capacity and levels of service
of public facilities for the purpose of issuing development
orders during the 12 mon~ folding completion of the annual
report. ~00~ ~J~[
CIE - 48
Public facility capacity review.
The County shall use the pro=edures specified in
Implementation Programs I and 2 to enforce the requirements of
Policy 1.5.1. and 1.5.3. of this Element.
Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities.
The County shall review each amendment to this Capital
Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for
levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital
Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element.
Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies.
The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management
Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this
Capital Improvements Element:
Standards for levels of service are applied within
appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards
for county-wide public facilities are applied to
development orders based on levels of service throughout
the County.
Standards for public facilities that serve less than he
entire County are applied to development orders on he
basis of levels of service within assigned areas.
Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an
annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than
case-by-case monitoring, for the following reasons:
annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures
for capital improvements during the County's fiscal
year; and
annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in
levels of service.
S~ 5-Tear Eval~a~O~
The required 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the
implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital
Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the
completion of the 5-year evaluation include:
review of annuals reports of the Concurrency Management
System;
Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to
the Comprehensive Plan.
Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvements Element,
including updated suppor~g documents.
CIE - 49
APPENDIX A
PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS
Secon~ Up,ate
1990/9~ - L994/95
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Prepared by
Growth Management Department
Spring, 1990
TABLE OF CONTENT8
LIST OF TABLES
INTRODUCTION
Purpose of this Study
Study Methodology
Data Collection and Analyses
Format of the Report
Compliance with State Regulations
Conclusion
CALCULATION OF PUBLIC FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Arterial and Collector Roads
Potable Water System
Sewer Treatment Plants
Landfill
Emergency Medical Service
Fire Station
Jail
Library Buildings
Library Collection
Government Buildings
Drainage -
Park and Recreation Facilities
1
13
4e
REVENUE FORECASTS
FII~tNCI~ FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
COLLIER COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS
87
9O
95
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNIN~ COMMUNITIES
97
L~ST OF TABLES
LEVEL OF SERVICE~ ANALYSIS OF NEED
Arterial and Collector Roads
Potable Water System
Sewer Treatment Plant : North County
Sewer Treatment Plant : South County
Solid Waste : Two Year Lined Cell Capacity
Solid Waste : Ten Years of Raw Land
Emergency Medical Services
Isle of Capri Fire District
Ochopee Fire District
Jail
Library Buildings
Library Collection
Government Buildings
Drainage
Parks & Recreation
FACILITY INVENTORY
Arterial and Collector Roads
Potable Water System
Sewer Treatment Plant
Landfill
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Station and Apparatus
Jail
Library Buildings
Library Collection
Government Buildings
Drainage
Park & Recreation Facilities
III. COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COST
Arterial and Collector Roads
Potable Water System
Sewer Treatment Plant
Landfill
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Station and Apparatus
Jail
Library Buildings
Library Collection
Government Buildings
Drainage Canal
Park & Recreation Facilities
Paq9
16
20
24
25
29
37
42
46
50
53
61 - 84
17
22
26
31
34
39
43
47
51
54
58
85
18
22
26
31
35
40
44
48
51
55
58
59
1. INTRODUCTION
Z. PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY
In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance No. 90-24, adopted March 21, 1990, the Board of County
Commissioners reviewed its first Annual Update and Inventory Report
(AUIR). The AUIR, using standards of service levels identified in
the other elements of the Growth Management Plan, forecasts the
amount of public facilities that will be required in Collier County
by 1994/95, including the costs of, and revenues for, the required
facilities. In addition to the Public Facilities standards defined
in the Plan, this report includes objective, measurable standards
for other facilities such as Emergency Medical Services, Fire
Stations, Jail, Library Buildings, Library Collection and
Government Buildings. The intent of including these additional
"Facility" standards in the analysis of need is to update a
comprehensive Capital Improvement Program for Collier County.
The AUIR, together with instructions from the Board of County
Commissioners, is the foundation for the Second Capital Improvement
Element Update (1991-1995). The CIE provides financially feasible
standards of service which are used to calculate the type and
amount of public facilities that are required during the next six
years. In the second phase of developing the CIE, specific capital
improvement projects are identified that provide the amount of
public facilities that are specified in this study. The final
phase of the CIE development consists of documenting the goals,
objectives and policies that insure the adoption and implementation
of public facilities concurrent with ~evelopment.
~I. STUDY METHODOLOGY
Given the statutory and regulatory requirement that the CIE be
based on financially feasible, measurable standards of service
levels for a period of at least five years, this study was updated
in order to answer two questions:
What i's the quantity of public facilities that will be
required in 1994/957
Is it financially feasible to provide the quantity of
facilities that will be required in 1994/957
The answer to each question can be calculated by using objective
data and two formulas.
- .1. -
Ouestion 1.
Formula 1.1:
Where
and
What is the cuantitv of Dublic facilities that will
be required in 1994/957
Demand x Standard ~ Requirement
Demand is the estimated 1994/95 population (or other
appropriate measure of need),
Standard is the amount of facility or service per
unit of demand.
Formula 1.2:
Where
and
Requirement - Inventory = Surplus (Deficiency)
Requirement is the result of Formula 1.1,
Inventory is the quantity of facility available as
of September 30, 1990.
Ouestion 2.
Formula 2.1:
Where
and
Formula 2.2:
Where
and
Is it financially feasible to Drovide the ~uantitv
of facilities that are required in 1994;957
Deficiency x Average Cost/Unit = SDeficiency
Deficiency is the result of Formula 1.2,
Average Cost/Unit is the usual cost of one unit of
facility.
SDeficiency - Revenue = $Surplus/(Deficiency)
SDeficiency is the result of Formula 2.1,
Revenue is the money available for public
facilities.
The result of Formula 2.2 is the test of financial feasibility of
the standards of service. A surplus of revenue over cost means the
standard of service is affordable with money left over (the
surplus), therefore, the standard is financially feasible. A
deficiency of revenue compared to cost means that there is not
enough money to build the facilities, and therefore the standard is
not financially feasible.
- 2 -
'ZII. D~T~ COLLECTION ~ND ~N~LYBIS
The calculations in this study provide answers to the questions and
formulas described above. In order to perform the calculations,
six separate areas of data collection and analysis were
investigated:
types of public facilities,
population and other demand factors,
standards for levels of service,
inventory of existing facilities,
average costs of new facilities, and
revenue sources.
~. T~Des of Facilities
Florida Statutes require the CIE to include" ... transportation,
sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational,
parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities." This
study includes all of these facilities except education and health
facilities which are not provided by the County. The regulations
also require the CIE to include all the public facilities for which
the County is financially responsible. The following types of
public facilities are included in this study as a result of this
regulation:
Jail, Emergency medical Service, ~ependent Fire District
Stations and Apparatus, Libraries and other Government
Buildings.
If a type of public facility is not included in the CIE, the County
is still permitted to expend money on such facilities, but such
discretionary expenditures will have to compete with all the
"mandatory" expenditures that maintain the standards of service
levels.
For information purposes, Appendix D outlines the newly approved
5-year Capital Improvement Plan for the Collier County Public
Schools, approved by the School Board in July, 1990.
B. PoDUlatio~ and Other Demand FaCtors
The Collier County Planning Department prepared the population and
housing data that are the basis for the demand factors contained in
this study. The Planning Department started with the high-range
forecasts by the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and
Business Research (BEBR). High-range data was selected instead of
mid-range projections because an analysis by the Planning
Department shows that.the County's actual growth rate corresponds
to the high-range forecasts more than to the mid-range.
The BEBR data is provided on a County-wide basis as of April 1st in
five year increments (i.e., 1990, 1995, 2000 etc.). The County-
wide forecasts were extrapolated from April 1st to October 1st in
order to coincide with the County's fiscal year. Linear extra-
polations were used to estimate the population during intermediate
years 1990 through 1995 in order to accommodate the time period of
the CIE. The adjusted high-range forecasts were expanded for peak
seasonal population for use with public facilities that are
sensitive to seasonal population variations. Finally, the adjusted
County-wide permanent population total was allocated three ways:
Urban vs. Rural; Incorporated vs. Unincorporated, and among
thirteen planning areas. (To date, there is no satisfactory
methodology for allocating the peak seasonal population among
urban/rural, incorporated/unincorporated, or planning areas).
Section 5 of Appendix A summarizes the most significant population
projections.
C, ~tandards for LeveXs of Serv$ce
The standards of service that are used in this study were reviewed
by Staff, the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), the Collier County
Planning Commission, and accepted by the Board of County
Commissioners at the time of its adoption of the Growth Management
Plan on January 10, 1989. Only through the formal amendment of the
Growth Management Plan can the standard of service, and the
corresponding level of service, be altered, replaced or deleted.
In general, the standards which have been adopted were selected
from one of the following sources: _
A standard adopted by Collier County in the existing
comprehensive plan, or other official County study or
publication (i.e., land development code, ordinance,
engineering study, etc.);
A standard of a state agency or professional association,
if recommended (with or without adjustment) by the
appropriate department of Collier County government;
A "standard" development from the existing level of
service or the present ratio of facilities to demand in
Collier County.
The standard that is recommended for a public facility appears on
the "cover sheet" for the facility, and other standards that can be
used as reference points are listed below the recommended
standards.
D. ~nnual Update and lDve~torv Report (AUIR} of Existin~
All public facilities operated by Collier County are located and
counted annually, and the inventories are summarized in the AUIR
and Appendix A of the CIE. The inventory of existing facilities is
extended through the end of the current fiscal year by adding any
facilities that are planned, budgeted, under construction, and
scheduled for completion by September 30, 1990. Facilities
appearing in the CIE that will be completed after September 30,
1990, are considered currently available for concurrency
determinations if they will be completed, under construction, or
under contract prior to September 30, 1994. Facilities appearing
in the CIE for FY94/95 are not available for concurrency
determination until they are completed, under construction, under
contract, in the FY 94/95 adopted Collier County Budget or, in the
case of roads, in either the first three (3) years of the FY95-00
CIE or FDOT 5-Year Work Program.
E. Averaqe costs of New Facilities
To test the probable financial feasibility of the standards of
service, an average cost per new facility is used in Formula 2.1,
described above. The average costs are re-evaluated annually by
the County department which is responsible for the facility. The
results appear in a separate table of "Cost Components and Average
Costs" that accompanies the calculation of each public facility's
requirements. After standards of service are reviewed by the
Planning Commission, and they are adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners, the County prepares specific capital improvement
projects to fulfill the standards, and each project includes
detailed cost estimates which will replace the average costs used
in this study.
F, ~evenue sources
Most counties have a few revenue sources that are regularly used
for capital improvements, and others that are used for operating
costs. Chapter 3, Forecasts of Revenues, lists the revenue sources
that Collier County can rely upon to pay for public facility
capital improvements. Each revenue source is listed and an
estimate of receipts is forecast for the period 1990/91 - 1994/95.
IV. FORMAT OF THE REPORT
This document represents an important phase in the annual
re-evaluation of the capital Improvement Element of Collier
County's Growth Management Plan. The report contains this year's
analysis of public facilities that are provided by the County,
including:
recommendations for standards of service;
102
- $ -
o forecasts of population and other indicators of demand
for service;
o calculations of present and future requirements for
additional facilities;
o summaries of inventories of existing public facilities;
o identification of surpluses and deficiencies of existing
facilities compared to present and future requirements;
o calculation of the costs of eliminating deficiencies;
0 forecasts of revenue to pay for the facilities, and;
o determination of the financial feasibility of the
recommended standards of service.
The report is primarily statistical in nature because of the use of
objective, quantifiable standards of service that indicate the
capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. The
following narrative describes the format of the report.
This report is presented in four parts:
A. Introduction;
B. Calculation of Public Facility Requirements;
C. Forecasts of Revenue, and; ..
D. Analysis of the Financial Feasibility of the
Recommendations.
A. Introduction
This introduction presents the purpose, methodology, and data
collection and analyses that produced the study. Following this
description of the format of the report, the introduction will
conclude with a .list of State regulatory requirements that are
fulfilled by this study.
~,, Calculation of public Facility Requirements
The calculation of requirements in Chapter 2 uses a standardized
four-part format for each type of public facility: (1) population
and standards, (2) calculations, (3) inventory, and (4) cost
components and average costs.
1. Population and Standards
The population and standards page begins with the "title" which
- $ -
· identifies the name of the type of public facility that is
analyzed.
The "population to be served" identifies the "service recipient,"
the "service area," and the "service period." Usually all
residents of the County receive the service in all areas of the
county, but some facilities are provided to only part of the
population and part of the geographical area of the county (i.e.,
utilities and fire stations). The service period indicates whether
service is targeted for the permanent population, the peak seasonal
population, or a weighted average of the two (8 months permanent, 4
months peak). Population figures used in this report have been
updated to reflect the most recent forecast from the University of
Florida's BEBR.
The recommended standard of service for the facility is a numerical
amount of service capacity per person (or other unit of demand,
like a utility account). The standard indicates how much service
each person is likely to use, and it is the "standard" in Formula
1.1, described above. The source of each standard is also listed.
Immediately following the recommended standard is a list of
standards from other sources that can be used for reference
purposes.
~, Level of Service Standard: xxxa-xx~x
The second section of analysis provides calculations according to
type of recipient and/or time period. The data at the bottom of
the page is presented in seven columns, as follows:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (s) (?)
AMOUNT "
REQUIRED AMOUNT SURPLUS OR VALUE
TIME POP- AT PLANNED AMOUNT DEFICIENCY OR COST
P~IOD ~ STANDARD IN CIP AVAILABLE ~240UNT ~
Column I is used to create a separate line of data and calculations
for three time periods:
1. from now through the end of fiscal year (9/30/90);
the five fiscal years from October 1990 through September
1995, and;
the second five year time frame from October 1995 through
September 2000.
These three time periods distinguish between the needs of current
residents and those for future growth. Under Column 1, the first
line of data is for current residents as of the end of fiscal year
1989-90. This line establishes whether or not there is a
deficiency of existing service compared to the recommended
40 , 104
- ?
standard. The second line of data shows the additional facility
requirements for growth that will occur during the next five years
(October 1990 - September 1995). The total of the two groups
(current residents + growth) is displayed on the next line of data.
The fourth line of data shows the additional facility requirements
for growth that will occur during the second five year period
(October 1995 - September 2000). The total for all three groups is
displayed on the last line.
Colttma 2 shows the number of people or other demand factor (i.e.,
utility customer accounts). This number is the "demand" in Formula
1.1, described above. The population or other demand factor will
be allocated between present population and new growth, as
described above.
~ol~au~ 3 shows the quantity of the facility that is needed to
provide the standard of service to the populations. This
"requirement" is calculated by using Formula 1.1:
multiply the demand (i.e., population) times the
standard (i.e., service units per capita).
The standard that appears in the heading for Column 3 is the
"standard of service" that was recommended on the population and
standards page.
Columa 4 displays the next fiscal year inventory anticipated to be
added during 1990-91.
Colttmn $ lists the amount of the public facility that is available
for the present population (i.e., current facilities plus any
planned for completion by 9/30/90, or %ontracted for completion
before 9/30/95). This inventory of facilities is always attributed
to the existing population, and is never shown on any data line for
future growth. The data in Column 4 is the "inventory" in Formula
1.2, described above, and a full summary of the inventory is
presented on the page following the calculations.
Column 6 shows the surplus or deficiency of current facilities
(Column 5) compared to required facilities (Column 3). The amount
in Column 6 is the "surplus/(deficiency)" calculated using Formula
1.2, and any deficiency is also the "deficiency" in Formula 2.1,
described above. If the requirement for a facility is less than
its inventory, the County has more than enough facilities to meet
the standard, and the extra facilities are counted as "surplus".
If the requirement is greater than the inventory, the shortage is
listed in parentheses ( ) as a "(deficiency)". The surplus/
deficiency for 9/30/90 is combined with the deficiency for 10/90 -
9/95 in order to arrive at the total surplus or deficiency as of
September 30, 1995. In other words, a surplus of existing
facilities will reduce or offset the deficiency caused by growth
and any deficiency of existing facilities will be added to the
· deficiency caused by growth.
Colttmn ? shows the cost to eliminate each deficiency (or the value
of surplus public facilities). The average cost of one unit of
facility (i.e., mile, gallon, ton, etc.) is listed in the Column
heading, and is itemized on the Cost Component and Average Cost
page. The cost is the "Average Cost/Unit" in Formula 2.1,
described above. The estimated cost of eliminating the deficiency
is determined by Formula 2.1:
multiply the deficiency times the average cost/unit.
Any cost surplus/deficiency for 9/30/90 is combined with the
deficiency for 10/90 - 9/95 in the same manner as Column 6. The
difference is that Column 6 shows the quantity of the facilities,
and Column 7 shows the dollar cost.
3, Inventory
The third section of the requirements analysis presents a mu=mary
of the inventory of existing public facilities. The "title" names
the type of facility, and the "subtitle" indicates the unit of
measurement (i.e., miles, gallons, tons, etc.) that is used to
report the inventory. The data is presented in six columns, as
follows:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
IN PLACE &
USABLE ADD IN ADD iN
AREA NAME ~ ~Q. 9/30/89 ~ ~ TOTAL
Colum~ 1 lists the planning area or other service area names.
Column 2 lists the planning area number.
Colttma 3 counts the number of facilities that were in place and
either in use or usable "as is" as of September 30, 1989.
Column 4 counts the additional facilities that are included in the
current fiscal year budget (1989-90) and which will be completed by
September 30, 1990. Where appropriate, facilities that are
contracted for Completion after October 1, 1989, but before
September 30, 1995, are also included. These facilities are
counted "in inventory" because their costs are already financed
from approved funding mechanisms, therefore such facilities will
not constitute any additional "cost" as shown on the calculations
page.
Column 5 counts the additional facilities that will be included in
the 1990-91 budget and will be completed by September 30, 1991.
- 9 -
Coltmn 6 is the total usable facilities, the sum of Columns 3
through 5. The usable facilities in Column 6 appear in the
calculations of facility requirements as the inventory of
facilities that are presently available to meet the requirements of
the standard of service (see Column 5 on the level of service
page).
4~ Cost Compone~ts a~ Average. Costs
The final section of the analysis of each public facility is an
itemized list of cost components and average costs. This page
details the component parts of a "prototype" or "average" facility,
and estimates the cost of each component. The data is presented in
four columns, as follows:
(2) (3) (4)
# COST COST PER COST/FACILITY
OST COMPONENT COMPONENTS COMPONENT
Colum~ 1 lists each component of the facility (i.e., land,
construction, equipment, etc.).
Column l lists the number of components in the "average" facility
(i.e., the number of acres of land at a water treatment plant).
Columa 3 gives the unit cost for components (i.e., the average cost
of one acre of land).
Colum~ 4 is used to display the results of calculations (i.e., the
result of multiplying "X" acres of land by "SY" per acre). At the
bottom of Column 4 the total cost of the prototype facility is
converted to a cost per unit. For example, the cost of a 4 million
gallon per day (MGD) water treatment plan is divided by 4 MGD in
order to estimate the cost per MGD. The cost per unit is the
figure that is used in the calculations of facility requirements to
estimate the cost of eliminating any deficiency of public
facilities compared to the requirement (see heading of Column 7,
level of service page).
C. Revenue Forecasts
The forecasts of revenue in Chapter 3 present the sources of
revenue that Collier County will use, including alternatives, to
finance its public facility capital improvements. Each source of
revenue is described, and the basis for each forecast is given.
D- Fi~ancial Feasibility Analysis
The analysis of the financial feasibility of the recommendations
appears in Chapter 4 as a comparison of the costs of required
facilities (presented in Chapter 2), to the available revenue
(forecast in Chapter 3). The calculation is performed using
Formula 2.2, described above. If the revenue is greater than the
cost, the recommended standards of service are financially
feasible. If the cost exceeds.Se r~ue, the standards of
L
- 10 -
service are not financially feasible.
In the event that a standard of service is not financially
feasible, there are four options available to the County:
Reduce the standard of service, which will reduce the
cost
Increase revenues to pay for the proposed standard of
service (higher rates for existing revenues, and/or new
sources of revenue),
Reduce the average cost (and possibly the quality) of the
public facility, thus reducing the total cost, or
4. Any combinations of options i - 3.
V. COMPLI;%NCE WITH STATE REOULATIONS
As part of the research conducted for this study, data was
collected and analyses were performed that are required by Chapter
9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code as part of the preparation
of the CIE. This report contains summaries of data and analyses
required by the following sections of Section 9J-5.016, F.A.C.:
Section (1) (o) requires an inventory of revenue sources and
funding mechanisms available for capital improvements:
See Chapter 3, Revenue Forecasts.
section (z) (b) requires an analysis of the general fiscal
implications of existing deficiencies and future needs for
each type of public facility:
See the net value of surplus assets and net cost of required
facilities for present populations, five years of growth and
total population in Column 7, "Value or (Cost)," of the table
of calculations for each type of public facility.
Section (2) (c) requires estimates of the costs of needed
capital improvements and an explanation of the basis of the
cost estimates:
See the Cost Component and Average Costs table for each public
facility.
Parts of Section (3) require various objectives and policies
dealing with adopted level of service standards:
See the specific standards of service on each population and
standards page and in the table of calculations for each
public facility.
- 11 -
Parts of Section (3) also require various objectives and
policies dealing with the financial feasibility of the CIE,
and the ability to make facilities available concurrent with
development:
See Chapter 4, Financial Feasibility Analysis.
VI. CONCLUSION
The Collier County Board of Commissioners formally adopted the
original CIE of the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989.
Chapter 163 Florida Statutes, requires that the CIE be updated
annually. Rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code requires
that the CIE cover a period of at least five fiscal years. As a
result, this Second CIE Update covers the 1990/91 - 1994/95
period.
- 12 -
CALCULATION OF PUBLIC FACILITY REQUIREMENTB
- 13 -
20
COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS
POPULATION TO BE SERVED ~S OF SEPTEMBER 30~ 1995:
Service Recipients: X
Service Area:
Service Period:
All County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Population
Peak Period Population
Weighted Average of
Permanent and Peak
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERYICE~
Road
Airport Road
County arterial and collector roads:
Level of Service as indicated" "below on
the basis of peak hour, peak season traffic
volume:
Level of Service "E" on the following
designated roadways:
From - To
Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway
Golden Gate Parkway
Airport Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard
Goodlette-Frank Road
Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway
Goodlette-Frank Road
Golden Gate Par~ay to US 41
Pine Ridge Road
Airport Road to 1-75
Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season shall be maintained on
all other County arterial and collector roads, however, any section
of road may operate at Level of Service "E" for a period not to
exceed two fiscal years following the determination of Level of
Service "E" in order to provide the County with time to restore Level
of Service "D" by making appropriate improvements.
Rule of Thumb:
Mileage equivalent of LOS =
0.00424 lane miles per capita (1)
Source of Standard:
Collier County Board of County
Commissioners
~.' 0.00~ ~a~a ~/ cu~.n~ ~.~ o~ co~r coun~
~~:'. ' capita Service
~,. ~S D Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance
~/.. ~S C Rural Florida DOT Transportation Plan
--~: ~S D Urban Expressways 80% or more ~ ~S
j/. Non-exgressways 70% or more ~ ~S
:.'.~'~: ~S D Seminole County
~'~ ~S C off-seaso~ Lee CouRty
CIP
~?. ~S D season
l~[,':~tr.'": 1~) ~,~ ~ana ~es/~4o,,22 ~e~gheoa average population ~
~¢~:";' .. (~) Collier County Comprehensive Plan, 9.29. ~tertal ~S
:;:'~ be~c~ark for land- use point ra~ng system.
~;%.:"~ (~) Ordi~a~ce 85- , Collier County.
~" 1986, pp. 57-8, 60-1, 74.
;'~}~ {~) Seminole County: "Reco~ended Facility Types and
, ' October 17, 1986
]: Standards, .
~'~:r data.
~:?::,::.., .
~.. - 15 -
(~)
(:)
(~)
(4)
(s)
(6)
" AR1ERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDz 0.~0~24 LAnE MILES/CAPITA
POPULATION LAHE fi]LES LANE MILES LANE MILES SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
FISCAL CQ-NIDE REOUIRED rLANNED AVAILAPLE (DErICIEMCY) (COST) AT
TEAR YElGlffEl AVG. O.eD42q IN LIP $467,000
171578 727.6 770.? 42.6 19,894,200
185769 787.6 8.4 718.6
207800 881.1 17.6 840.2 (40.9) (19,100,$001
219BIZ 932.D 7.4 647.& (84.4l (39,414,800)
230636 978.7 14.b 862.2 IllS.S)
2418~5 1~25.4 20.8 883.0 (142.4) (66,M0,800)
252807 1071.9 883.0 (188.91 (88,216,300)
263783 1118.4 883.0
274760 i165.0 883.0 (282.01 (191,694,000J
285741 1211.5 88~.D (328,5) (153,40%$001
2968Z6 1258.5 883.0 (379,5) (179,358,500l
LANE MILES LANE nILES LANE rilLES S~I~I. US/ VIII. Ut OR
POPULATION REOUIRED PLANNED AVAILAPLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST] AT
Tll[ PER~OD (liEIGHTED AVS.) 0.0G424 Iff LIP $467,000/LAtE tiS.
196780 8~4.3 52.4 62Z.6
56027 ~37.6 60.4 60.4 (177.21 (82,752,400)
· .~:~..'.,:, ~:
W~;?:~'' .~ITM SUITOTAL 252907 1,071.9 112.9 983 (198.9) (88,216,$00J
?:::. : ffi }~ ~TH 54~81 233.1 0.0 O 168.g (87,142,2001
KTEI The unit cost mas deteralned by dividlfl6 the sum of the total estlaated costs of the individual proJKtt
~~~ by the sun of the kohl lane niles of the projects.
,~'
- 16
SUMMARY OF ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD INVENTORY
(Lane Miles)
,i PLAN AREA NAME
~.'" North Naples
?,::(' Central Naples
":. :. Golden Gate
· East Naples
;i,~ South Naples
Marco
Faka-Palm
::i[, Creek
,Rural Estates
:<'.?...
Urban Estates
".Corkscrew
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY USABLE
FO, 9~30~89 9130190 ~ TOTAL
i 82.6 20.8 103.4
2 72.8 2.8 13.2 88.8
3 81.2 2.5 83.7
4 32.4 32.4
5 19.8 6.8 26.6
6 55.8 55.8
7 64.8 64.8
8 31.4
9 99.2
10 138.6
3.1
31.4
102.3
138.6
Immokalee 11 29.4 3.2
Big Cypress 12 62 2
~Countywide Total 770.2 8.4 44.0
· Includes County arterials and collectors, excludes State and
,.i.~ Federal roads.
32.6
822.6
- 17 -
COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD
COBT COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COST8
AVERAGE COST COMPQNENT
A. Design
(2) (3) (4)
URBAN RURAL COST/FACILITY
SECTION ~F~ AVG.~2~ x (3~
34,000 27,000 $ 30,000
B. Right-of-Way
C. Construction 1
D' Other 2
AVERAGE COST PER LANE MILE
53,000 75,000 65,000
340,000 272,000 303,000
72,000 66,000
69.000
467~000
'Includes culverts and bridges - also applies to both arterial
and collector costs.
Includes lighting, sidewalks, bikepaths and administrative/
overhead costs.
- 18 -
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM SERVICE AREA
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
1. Service Recipients:
2. Service Area:
X
3. Service Period:
, ~
Ail County Residents
Other: Water Customers
County-wide
Other: Water System
Permanent Population
Peak Period Population
Weighted Average of
Permanent and Peak
104,675'*
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
Source of Standard:
135 gal/day/capita plus 21% for non-
residential
Utilities Division, based on Water Master
Plan (1) and on historical ratios of
residential and non-residential water
consumption
Other Standards for Reference
100 gdpc***
125 gdpc
100 gdpc
Fire Flow****
144 gdpc
125 gdpc
Source
Lee County CIP (2)
6 County region (S.W. Fla.) (3)
Seminole County (4)
Seminole County (4)
Florida Governor's Office (5)
Sipe and Starnes (5)
# Includes wells, storage tanks, treatment plants, and aquifer
storage and recovery
** Peak seasonal population based on U of F upper range projections
Includes County Water/Sewer District and proposed expansions
Excludes Marco Water/Sewer District and Goodland Water District
*** gdpc - gallons per day per capita
**** Fire Flow = 500 gpm residential & 1250 gpm commercial,
institutional or industrial
Phase I Water Master Plan for Western Collier County. October
1985, p.41.
Lee County tIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.200, (based on local
engineering standard).
S.W. Florida Regional Planning Commission, "Economic Views,"
v. lO, n.2, February, 1986.
Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986.
Water ~D~ Wastewater In~yastructure Needs: 1990 and 20QQ.
Chapter 3.
116
- 19 -
rO!~PLE ~AIER SYSi[fll
LEVEL OF SERVICE SiANDARO: I$51GPDICAPIIA PLUS 211 NON-RESIDEKT}AL
POPIAATION ~6O flGO ~GD SURFLUSI VALUE OR
FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE {DEFICIENCY) {COSTI AT
1rEAR SERVICE AREA , 0.00024500 IH CIP 11,635,730
86-9? 64143 I$.?P 12.0~ {3.70) (6,765,541J
87-90 77416 ig.GO 12.0~ (7.00) (12,857,510)
?O-VI 82883 20.3~ 6.00 16.00 12.30)
91-92 68~26 21.60 ?.50 27.50 5.90 JO,B20~IB7
92-93 ~3780 23.00 8.00 35.~0 12.50
93-94 ?922? 24.~0 35.50 11.20' 20w540~016
?q-TS 104675 25.60 4.00 3?.50 13.90 2~,491,627
9~-96 110058 27.e0 39.~0 12.50 22,~24,125
96-97 11~21 28.30 39.50 11.20
tT-gK 120940, 29.6~ $?.~0 9.90 18,15S,907
9s-. 126364 3t.oo 39.5o e.s0 H,388,40~
79-00 131783 32.30 ~9.$0 7.20
POPULATION flGD flSO flGD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
COUNTY REOUIRED PLA,NEO AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY} [COST} AT
SERVICE AREA 2451CAPITA IN CIP 11,833,930
lille I~RIOD
rftES~#T lO
)~SO/TO 77436
· ~ 1TALC 6ROVTH
'lOI1~'tlt3 27239
}-TrAit SUOTOTAL 104675
~ 3-TR 6R~TH 27110
lO ~ TOT~
101~-~100 131765
19.00 0 12.00 (7.00) (12,B37,510) . .:.~
6.60 26 27.50 20.90 38,329,1~7
25.60 26 - 39.50 13.90 25p491,627
6.70 0 0.00 (6.70) (12~287,33J)
32.30 28 37.5Q 7.20 13,204,296
IKFI#ITIOII
Treatient plant capacity plus available thirty (~0)
day potable mater storage plus aquifer storage and
rKovery systets,
- 20 -
.[
FURTHER NOTES REGARDING WATER TREATMENT PLANT REQUIREMENTS
Standards of Service = 135 gdpc + 21% for non-residential, which
totals 163.485 gdpc. The standard is multiplied times 1.5 to
incorporate peak design factor of 50%:
163.485 x 1.5 ~ 245 gdpc.
Does not include water purchased from the City of Naples, available
until January 1, 1990, which will be replaced by the expansion of
the South County Regional Plant.
~isting "deficiency" is met by private utilities which may be
phased out by future County capacity increases. Utility planning
requires the development of larger scale facilities in order to
provide for needs beyond 1995.
- 21 -
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM FACILITY INVENTORY
(~illions off Gallona per da~
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY USABLE
AREA NAME ~ ~Q, 9/30/89 9/30/90 9_~ _~
Water Service Area 13.50MGD 0.30MGD 8.20MGD 22.00MGD
WATER TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS AND AVERI%GR COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
· -. (6)
;'~' :tO
(6)
(7)
MGD Treatment Plant
A. Treatment Plant (MGD)
B. Design (% of Plant)
C. Land (acre)
TOTAL COST
MGD IN PLANT
AVERAGE COST PER MGD
(5)1(6)
MGD Wellf~9l~
A. Equipment (Well)
B. Design (% of Well)
C. Lan4 (acre)
TOTAL COST
MGD IN WELLFIELD
AVERAGE COST PER MGD
(5)/(6)
MGD Storaae Tank
A. Structure (Tank)
B. Design (% of Tank)
C. Land (acre)
TOTAL COST
MGD IN STORAGE TANK
AVERAGE COST PER MGD
(~)/(6)
"ACIDITY COST PER ~D
Treatment Plant
Well
Storage Ta~
Cost per MGD
(2) (3) (4)
# COST COST PER COST/FACILITY
COMPONENTS ~ f2~ x (3)
10
10,156,590 17%
14 22,326
15
4,460,985 17%
0.215 36,000
1
2,177,066 17%
5 22,326
$ 10,156,590
1,726,620
12,195,774
1,219,577
4,460,985
758,367
7.740
5,227,092
15
348,473
2,177,066
370,101
2,658,797
265,880
1,219,577
348,473
265.880
1,833,930
- 22 -
1. Service Recipients:
2. Service Area:
X
3. Service Period:
X
Ail County Residents
Other: Sewer Customers
County-wide
Other: Sewer System
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. = North
South
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
42,105
83,256
STANDARD OF SERVICEI
100 gal/day/capita plus 21% for non-
residential
Source of Standard: Utilities Division, based on Sewer Master
Plan (1) and on historical ratios of
residential and non-residential water
consumption
Standard Source
100 gdpc** Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2)
80 gdpc Lee County CIP (3)
34 gdpc Union County (lo'Qest in Fla.) (4)
510 gdpc Nassau County (highest in Fla.) (4)
122.5 gdpc Governor's Office: State average (4)
100 gdpc 6 County region (S.W. Fla.) (5)
100 gdpc Seminole County (6)
· Includes effluent disposal facilities and collection systems
· * gdpc = gallons per day per capita
(1) South County Sewer Master Plan, May, ~98~, p. VIII-6.
Collier County Comprehensive P;an, p.215. Reference to benchmark
used in "201" plan.
(3) Lee County, CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.208 (based on local
(4) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs: 1990 and 2000. Chapter
4, (based on 85% of Fla. average water consumption of 144 gdpc).
($) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic Views," v. lO,
n.2, February, 1986.
40 lit'l~pes and Standards,
(6) Seminole County: "Recommended .Faci _~_Ty "
October 17, 1986.
- 23 -
SEMER IREAINEflT rLANT: NURTII COUNIY
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1061GPDICArITA PLUS 21.It NON-RESIDENTIAL
I'~P~.ATION flGD flGO MGD SURPLUS/ VAL~ OR
FISCAl. COUNIY REOUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT
1rEM SERVICE AREA 0.00012! IH CIP i2,754,144
11-81 27372 ~.~ 2.5 to.el (2,203,315!
I~-1o 2~27~ 3.5 2.0 4.5 1.0 2,754,L4!
90-lt 33020 4.0 4.5 0.5 1,377,072
91-~2 352~1 4.3 4.5 0.2
~'~3 $756~ 4.5 2.0 6.5 2.0 5,508,281
IS'Vt 3~155 ~.8 6.5 1.7 4,682~04~
42101 5.1 6.5 1.4 3,855,102
443&0 ~.4 6.5 1.! $,02~,551
41d, 17 $.& 6.5 0.~ 2~478p750
48873 $.~ 6.5 o.6 l,&52~qu&
5112~ 6.2 6.5 0.3 826,243
5338S 6.5 6.5 0.0 0
PQI~ATION ~GO ~60 ~60 SURrLIAI VAC~ OR
CIVIllY REObIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHCY) (CQST! AT
S~RVICE AREA 1211CAPITA IN CIP 12,754,144
2~27~ 3.5 2.0 4.5 1.0 2~754,~44
1~826 1.6 2.0 2.0 004 1,101,658
i'IIBTOTAC 42105 5.1 4.0 6;5 1.4 3,855,802
11281 1.4 0.0 0.0 (l.4J (3,855,8021
53386 6.5 4.0 6.5 0.0 0
- 24 -
t
SEYER 1REATflENT PLANTE SOUIH COUNTY
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD( IOOlOFDICAPITA PLUS 21Z NOfl-RESIOEN11AL
POPUt. AIION flGO NOD flGD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
FISCAL COUI'IT¥ REOUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIEI~Y} (COOT) AT
TEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 IN CIP $2,754,14q
86-66 50026 : 6.~ 3,T (2.81 (?,7il,&03)
9~-90 63062 7.6 ~,T (4.]1 (ll,642,glVI
I0-II 67061 6,1 4.? e.o (0,1) (273,414)
~t-~2 7t109 6.6 e.o (o.&l (1,6~2,4B&1
~2-93 73156 ~,l 4.0 12,0 2.V 7,q67,018
~3-V4 7920~ ~,6 12.0 2,4 6,60%646
~4-65 63256 10,1 t2,0 i.e 5,232,874
~5-~6 872~5 t0,6 t2,0 1,4 3,855,.2
1&-~7 q1274 it,o 12,0 1,0 2,754,144
~7-~! ~52B0 11,5 12,0 O,5 1,377,o72
~u-~ qe2~o 12,0 12,0 0,0 0
.-00 t032~ 12.~ t2,o (0,5) (t,377,072)
1111f. KRIO0
N[SEXT TO
POt%"LATION flGD ~O flGO SURPLUS/
COUNTY REOUIREO PLAI~ED AVAILABLE (DEFICIE#CY!
SERVICE AREA IZIlCAPITA IN CIP
VALU~OR
(COST! AT
12,754,Lfl
3..1TAI SUBTOTAL
63062 7.6 0.0 3.3 (4.3) (iI,B42,BHJ
20l~4 2.5 9.7 8.7 6.2 17,075,&~$
83256 10.1 6.7 .. IZ.0 l.~ 5,232,874
~ 5"YR 6R01dTH
20043
lt lT~ TOTP, L
10110-I109
10~2~ L2,5 8.7 12.0 (0.5) (1,$77s072i
- 25 -
SUMMARY OF SEWER TREATMENT PLANT INVENTORY
(Millions of Oallons per day)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY
AREA NAME & NO. 9/30;89 9/30/90 9/30;91
North 2.5 2.0
South 3.3 *
Existing interim facilities to be phased out by 1992 upon
completion of South County Regional Treatment Plant.
(6)
USABLE
4.5
3.3
SEWER TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS AND AYERAOE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
10.5 MGD Treat~eDt Plant
A. Treatment Plant (MGD)
Design (% of Plant)
Land (acre)
TOTAL COST
MGD IN TREATMENT PLANT
AVERAGE COST PER MGD
(5)/(6)
(2) (3)
# COST COST PER
COMPONENT COMPONENT
8.0 $1,336,000
10,688,000 17%
60 12,799
MGD SYstem Effluent DisDoSal
Percolation Pond Land (MGD) 2"
Effluent Distribution (MGD) 6.6
Design (% of above) 5,000,000
TOTAL COST
MGD SYSTEM EFFLUENT
DISPOSAL
(7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD
(5)/(6)
~.~;~:i-.Treatment Plant'
i?.::~.'Effluent Disposal
· .'~" .Total Cost per MGD
i* · Figures do not total to 8 MGD in all cases
- 26 -
294,667
757,576
17%
(4)
COST/FACILITY
¢2) x ())
10,688,000
1,816,960
767.940
13,272,900
1,573,113
589,334
5,000,000
SSO.OQQ
6,439,334
1,573,113
2,754,144
LANDFILL
POPULATION TO BE SERVED ]%S OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
Residents
Other:
Se~ice Area: X County-wide
Other
Service Period: Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
X Weighted Average
of Pe~anent and
Peak
215,268
295,773
241,835
STAND]%RD OF SERVICE:
Source of Standard:
1. 40 tons/capita/year
1. 14 tons/capita/year
1.095 tons/capita/year
1. 00 tons/capita/year
1.55 tons of solid waste/capita/year, and 2
years capacity of lined cells, and 10 years
capacity of raw land
Mid-range of 5 year forecast by Solid Waste
Department
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
Other Stan4ards for Reference
source
current Level of County Service (1)
Lee County CIP (2)
6 County region (S.W. Fla) (3)
Seminole County (4)
200,000 tons/year/142,498 weighted average pop. @ 9/30/86
Lee County CIP: 1986-87
service level)
- 1990-91. p.220, (based on 1986
S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic Views,"
v.10, n.2, February, 1986.
Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986
- 27 -
FISCAL
YEAR
SOLID IMSTE
LEV~ OF S~qVIC~ STAiIDARD: t.53 TONS;CAPITA
Tiro YEARS LPtEO CELL CAPACITY (~ples and In, filet)
POPULATION KOIIOIIN6 CAPACITY 2XO YEAR
CO-IIIDE CAPACITY REOUIREO CAPACITY
NEIOHTEO AVG. AVAILAgt. E 1.5500 IIEOUIREO
CAPACITY SURPLUS/ VALUE/ CAPACITY ACTUAL
PLAHIED (DEFICIENCY) COST AT ACTUALLY USED LOS
IN LIP 21(0 YEAR LOSS $6.00 PROVIDED
88-89 17i,599 10497,904 265,197 287,933 ~4],994 5,663,966 338,849 2.0
87-70 185,763 1,t57,055 287,?~ ~05,007 1,036,551 10~2,664 %615,786 ~96,740
90-91 176,780 1o707,673 305000? 32200?0 1,260o574 7,66:,446 O.O
91-?2 207,600 1,602,664 322,D90 340,709 1,182,213 2,122,079 12.732,472 0.0
?2-Y: 219,812 2,462,787 340,709 357,796 3,4840800 5,24?,093 31,494,4~7 D,O
?~-94 :~0,8~6 2,606,879 357,796 374,844 4,874,23~ .. 29,245,4~2 0.0
94'95 241,8~2 5,24%¢e~ ~74,944 391,65! 4,46~,388 26,894,~26 D,O
95-96 252,807 4,874,2~9 391,851 408,864 4,073,524 24,441,145
96-97 26;,765 4,462,368 408,864 425,678 3,647,646 21,885,677
97-98 274,760 4,073,224 422,878 442,899 3,204,747 19,228,492 0.0
98-99 285,741 3,647,646 442,899 460,065 ; 2,744,683 16.458,096
~'0~ 296,R~& ~,~04~747 4&D,062 473~817 2,27D~e~6 J:,62~,89~ 0.0
TIIIE PERIOD
POPULATIOH ~E6IHNIN6 CAPACITY 2ND YEAR
CO-¥IDE CAPACITY REOUI~ED CAPACITY
~ISHTED AVG. AVAILABLE ~.5500 REOUI£ED
PRESENT TO
9130190 165,763 1,159,055 287,9~: $05,009 566,1i~ 3,396,680
CAPACITY S~.PLUS/ VALe/
PLANllED (DEFICIENCY) COST AT ~ c~
IN LIP 2ND YEAR LOSS $6.00/TCN
q.-f ,
,mac
.,,q~
YEAR 680¥TH
1DI90-..~195 56,07~ 4,090,026 66,912 86,842 $,?16,:74 2~,477,646
5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 241,615 5,249,063 ~4,844 391,821 4,482,388 26,894,~2&
2140 5*YR 6ROVTH 54~9B1 (2,044,Z~5) 85,221 820016 (2,211,572) (13,269,430)
tO YEM TOTAL
iOIVO"TIO0 276,816 3,204,747 460,065 473,867 20270,8~6 13,624,8~6
SOLID WASTE
LEVEL DF SERVICE SIAtlDARDt 1.55 TONSICArlTA
TEN YEMS OF RAM LANO~ ACRES (Haplfs amd Is,ataleel
POPULATION POruLATIOH ACRES RAM LAND RAM LAND ACRES SURPLUS/ VALUE/
CO-MIlE TEN YEAR REOUIRED ACflE$ ACRES fLANNEl (OEFICIENCYI COS! AT
AVG. 1OTAL AI(HUALLY AVAILABLE REDUIREO IH CIP IlO-YEARS LAND) 120,000
171,598
185,763
196,780
207,800
21~812
230,836
252,607
263,783
274,760
285,741
29&,SI&
'307,988
350,338
341,518
352,958
364,659
376,364
388,071
411,873
2,;45,774 25.0 3;~.2 321.5 51.7 1,033,474
2,359,917 27.l 354.2 344.2 300 31~.0 6,200,018
2,470,970 28.7 621.1 ~60.4 266.7
2,582,178 3o.3 598.4 376.6 221.8
2,693,5~9 ~.l 568.1 ~92.8 175.2
2,B04,065 33.7 5~6.0 4~8.9 127.1 2,541,437
2,914,747 35.3 5~Z.4 425.t 77.3 1,$q$,289
3,025,870 ~6.9 467.1 441.3 25.9 $15,773
3,137,722 38.5 430.2 457.6 (27.~J (~47~873)'~
3,250,303 40.1 391.7 474.0 182.3J
3,363,614 41.7' 351.7 49p.& 1138.9)
3,477,654 43.~ 31~.~ 507.2 1197.2)
I
rOPULAIiON POPULATION ACRES RAN LAHO RA&.LAHD ACRES
CO-MID( TEN yr%q REOUIRED ACRES ACRES fLANNEl
IIEIGHTEI RV6. TO)AL AHNIJALLY AVAILABLE REDUIRED IN CIP
ID~rlCIENCY) COST AT
(lO YEARS LAXD t20,O~OIACRE
185,763 2,357,917 27.1 354.2
~44.2 300.0
80.9 O.O
425.1 300.0
82.1
36,072 554,B~0. 8.2 148.2
241,835 2,914,747 35.$ 502.4
5%781 562,907 8.0 1192.41
296,816. 3,477,654 43.3 ~10.0
501.2 0.0
- 29
]77.3 7,54~,284J
1274.4J
1197.21 13,943,6631
LLNDFILL NOTES
Total acreage of the Naples and Immokalee Landfills was 400
acres as of 9-30-89. An additional 300 acres of land adjacent
to the Naples Landfill is scheduled to be acquired during FY90
for future expansion but may take longer to complete.
For inventory and surplus/deficiency calculations, the
combined capacity of the Naples and Immokalee landfills i!
considered available to serve the county-wide 90pulation.
The remaining capacity of Cell 6 is projected to be 2,682,018
tons by the end of FYP0. A recycling rate of 30% and
diversion of all biomass, inerts and construction/demolition
materials will allow the Naples Cell 6 to last until 1997 at
our present growth rate of 18.5%. However, mining is not yet
a certainty.
Projection which indicated true present capacity: Gross tons
per acre is based on a design of 90' cell height using one
square foot of lined area to contain one ton of waste; Cells
constructed with 3:1 side slopes.
Cell 6 -
Immokalee
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
1,182,213 Tons Capacity
1,036,551 Tons Capacity
1,182,213 Tons Capacity
906,048 Tons Capacity
- 30 -
(1) (2)
AREA NAME & NO.
Countywide
(lined cell/tons)
Countywide
(raw land acres)
BUMMARY OF LANDFILL INVENTORY
(3) (4) (S)
USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY
9;30!89 9/30;90 ~
1,159,055
1,036,551
320 300
(6)
USABLE
_TDXA~,
2,195,606
620
L~NDFILL COST COMPONENTS ~ AVERAGE COSTS
(6)
(1)
COST COMPONENT
One Acre Cell
A. Design
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Ge
(2) (3)
# COST COST PER
COMPONENTS COMPONENT
Equipment
Cell base & liner
Closure
Post Closure -
Leachate Treatment
TOTAL COST
TONS IN ONE ACRE CELL
AVERAGE COST PER TON (5)/(6)
Land: 20,00'0/acre divided by 43,560 tons/acre
TOTAL AVERAGE COST PER TON
- 31 -
(4)
COST/FACILITY
¢2~ x f31
$ 2,000
45,000
114,300
20,000
55,000
5.000
241,300
43.560
5.54
0.46
6.00
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
POP~TION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
Service Recipients:
Service Area:
Service Period:
All County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop.
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
BTANDJ~LD OF BERVICE~
6 minute or less mean average response time
between call for service and arrival at
scene for emergency responses to or in
major population centers of Collier County
Rule of Thumb:
0.00006 EMS units/capita
(3.)
Source of Standard:
Director of Emergency Medical
Services
Other Stan4ar4s for Reference
0.00005 EMS stations/
capita
0.00003 EMS stations/
capita
0.00650 EMS calls/capita
Source
Current Collier County Service
Average
Lee County current ratio (3)
Lee County current call load
(1)
1986 response time in the City of Naples was approximately the
standard of service (actually 5.72 minutes), therefore the ratio
of EMS units to Naples population is presumed to provide the
level of service of 6 minute response time.
Naples service units in 1986 = 1.19 units
(365 calls in Naples/307 average calls per unit countywide)
Naples population in 1986 = 18,343, therefore,
1.19 units/18,343 population = 0.00006 units/capita
(2) 6 stations/132,084 population @ 9/30/87
Ratio of Lee County 1986 peak population to EMS stations
(4)
M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development
project "The Parklands," 10/17/85
- 32 -
/
L[V£L OF SERVlCE SI~HDARD~.OOO~ UNIISICAPIIA
EMS UNIIS EMS HItS INS UNIIS SUR~LUSI YALIJ[ OR
FISCAL FOPULAIjON REQUIREb PLAI~tlED AVAILMLE (DEFICIENCY) (CUSTI AT
YEAR (CO-NIOE FERN) O.O000& !11ClP 1325,~00
98-64
87-I0
~7-~9
91-00
1~2 5&i ~.0 6 (1.0) 0
1&5 368 !0.0 l.u 9.0 Il.O) (325,4001
175 365 lt.O t.O 10.~ Il.O)
165 34q ll.O I(*.O (l.o) 132~,VO~l
l~ 32~ t~.O 1~.6 (2,0) (651,800)
20530~ 12.0 I.O ll.O ti.O)
21~ ~se 13.0 I.O 12.0 (i.o)
225 205 14.~ 12.o (2.o1
235 143 lq.O 12.0 (2.0l (&$l,gOOJ
245 084 15.0 12.0 (3.01
255,029 ILO 12,0 (3.0) (~77,700)
265,057 16.0 12,0 14.0) (1,303,600)
Tl~E ~ERIO0
E~5 UNITS Efts UHIT5 EAS UNITS SURPLUS/
POPULATION REOUI~ED rLAIINEO AVAILAPLE (DEFICIENCY)
(CO-MEDE PERN) 0.00006 IH CIP
VALUE OR
(COST) AT
PRESEXT TO
W301?O 165,~88 i0.O i.0 4.0 El.O)
10110-?195 47,66~ 3.0 2.0 2.0 |l.O)
S YEM SUBTOTAL 215,268 13.o ~.o ll.o ILO)
2X1) $'YR 6R~Tll 47,78~ 16.0 l.O 0.0 0.0
JO YEAR T01AL
JOl~O-~lO0 265,057 16.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
(651,800)
651,800
0
IlOTEt 1he unit cost includes the cost of Lhe station, E~S units, and asociated station equip.nt.
UNIT LOCATIOKS
FY 8T-~O South Ta,iami Trail- Lely Estates
FY ~O-?l 6.6. Far,Nay & Airport Rd.
FY ~2-93 Systel Status Float Unit
t
40 , . 130
- 33
S~Y oF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INVENTORY
(Units)
PLAN AREA NAME
North Naples
.~,. 'Central Naples
~,:;. '<.:Golden Gate
':':~' .East Naples
.... S~nlth Naples
,'" Marco
Royal Faka-Palm
Creek
.' ,):;??:Corkscrew
~ · .... 'I~o~alee---
;:~- Big ~ress
~' "Count~tde Total
(2) (3)
USABLE @
NO. 9/30/89
1 2
2 1
3 1
4 1
5
6 1
7
8
9
10
11
12
(4)
ADD BY
9/30/90
(5)
ADD BY
(6)
USABLE
2
1
1
2
9
- 34 -
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
A. Vehicle
B. Building (square feet)
De
Design (% of building)
Furniture (rooms)
Equipment
Land (1/2 acre)
Appraisal Fee
AVERAGE COST PER EMS UNIT
?
(2) (3)
# COST COST
COMPONENT/ PER
SECTION SECTION
i 65,000
2,750 55
151,300 1.05%
3 25,003
i 24,000
i 75,000
i 1,500
- 35 -
(4)
COST/FACIL'rT¥
x {'3)
$ 65,000
151,300
1,600
7,500
24,000
75,000
$ 325,900
DEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICT STATIONS AND ~PP;~RATUB
POPULATION TO BE SERVED ~S OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
Service Recipients:
X
Service Area:
X
Service Period: X
All County Residents
Other: Fire District Residents
County-wide
Other: Fire Districts
Permanent Pop. ~
Isle of Capri = 1,005/Ochopee ~ 2,210
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average of Permanent & Peak
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
x.xxxx apparatus & fire station per capita
0.00097 Isle of Capri/0.00057 Ochopee
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
2.3 of present ratio of apparatus to
population
(3.)
Other Standards for Reference
'Level of Service
7 or less, within 3
miles of a fire station
0.0001641 fire station/
capita
0.0356 fire calls/capita
5 minute Countywide
· ii~.~'i.., average response time
.'!/~i.:.,.,i' fro~ receipt of alarm
,i~,'i~.i',.to arrival ~ 3,251
. (x)
source
Collier County Comprehensive Plan
Lee County current ratio
Lee County current call load
(2)
(3)
(4)
Isle of Capri = I apparatus/ 685 population x 2/3 = 0.00097
Ochopee = 2 apparatus/2,351 population x 2/3 ~ 0.00057
Collier County Comprehensive Plan, p.29. Service benchmarks for
land use point rating system
Ratio of Lee County 1986 unincorporated peak population to
unincorporated stations
M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development
project "The Parklands", 10/17/85
Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986
I ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) = 1 dwelling unit with 2.82
persons
- 36 -
ISLE 8r CA~RI rlRE DISIRICI
LEVEL OF SERVICE STAHOARD~.OO0?I APrARATUS/CAriTA
PQPU~ATIOH A~PARATUS APPARATUS A~PARAIUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
fiSCAL IISTRICT REDUIRED PLAtlH£D AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHC¥) ICOST! AT
~EAR SERVICE A;EA 0.000?7 IN CIP tq$2,290
918 0.8 I.~ 0.2 86,436
~05 0.9 I.O 0.1 43,229
943 0.; i.O 0.! 45,229
~85 t.o 1.0 o.o 0
1005 1.0 l.O 0.0 0
1005 |.0 1.0 0,0 0
10o5 I,O 1,o 0,0 0
1005 I.O 1.0 0.0 0
1005; 1.0 1.0 0.0 0
1005 1.0 1.0 0.0 0
11,[ PERIOD
POPULA110N A~ARAIU$ A~PARA1US APPARATUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
DISTRICT REOUIRED rLANNED AVAILABLE (OEF1CIENCYJ (COST) AT
SERVICE A~EA .000~71CAPIIA IN CIP Iq$2,2~OIUHIT
~23 0.~ 0 I 0.1 45~'~
82 o.! o o (o.l)
1005 1.0 0 ! 0.0 0
0 0,0 0 - 0 0,0 0
1005 i.0 0 I 0,0 0
134
- 3'7
OCHOPEE FIRE DISTRICT
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD:.O0051APrAAATUSICAPITA
PQ~ULATION M'PARATUS APPARAIUS APPARATUS SURimi VALUE OR
FISCAL DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANHED AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHCYI (COSTI AT
YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.00057 IH CIP $147,2J9
88-B~ 207~ !.2 2 O,B 117,775
87-70 2101 1.2 2 0.8 117,775
~O-~l 2123 1,2 2 0.8 117,775
mi-{2 2145 1.2 2 0.8 IL!,77~
~2-~$ 2L66 1.2 2 0.8 117,775
~3-94 2188 1.2 2 0,8 117,77~
~4'~5 2210 1.3 2 O,7 1o3,o55
.-~& 2233 1.3 2 0.7 L03,0~3
%-~7 2256 t.3 2 0.? 105,0~3
~7o98 227~ 1.3 2 o.7 103,053
.-. 2302 1.~ 2 0.7 103,053
.-00 2325 1.3 ~ o,7 103,053
11fie PERIOD
POI'~AT[OH APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARAIUS SURPjust
DISTRICT REOUIRED PLA~NEO AVAILABLE (DEFICIEWCY)
SERVICE AREA .OOOS~ICAPIIA IN CIP
VAL~ mi
(COSTI AT
$147,2L~IU#iT
PRESENT TO
II301t0 2123 i.2 0 2
$ YEAR GRONTH
S-YEAR SUITOTAL 22~0 1.3 O
~ $-TR GRQYTH 115 O.O 0
LO YEAR TOTAL ~
IO/~O-~lO~ 2325 1,3 0
L17,77]
o (0.1)
2 0,7 103,053
0 O,O
2 0,7 L05,053
The unJL cask includes Lhe cost o! Lhe stak~on, ~pparaLus, and &s$ochted stiLion equLpsenL.
'40 135
- 38 -
SUMMARY OF FIRE STATION ]%ND APPARATUS INVENTORY
(Apparatus)
(1)
kI~AN AREA NAME
(2) (3) (4) (~) (6)
USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY USABLE
NO. 9/30/89 9/30/90 ~ TOTAL
North Naples
1
Central Naples
Golden Gate
East Naples
3
4
South Naples
5
Marco
ROyal Faka-Palm
. Creek
Rural Estates
Corkscrew
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
- 39 -
FIRE STATION AND APPARATUS
COST COMPONENTS AND ]%VERAGE COST
(1)
COST COMPONENT
ISLE OF CAPRI
A. Apparatus
B. Structure (square feet)
C. Design (% of building)
D. Furniture (rooms)
E. Land (square feet)
AVERAGE COST PER APPARATUS
+ STATION
OC~OPEE
A. Apparatus
B. Structure (square feet)
C. Design (% of building)
D. Furniture
E. Land (acres)
(5) TOTAL COST
(6) APPARATUS
(7) AVERAGE COST PER APPARATUS
+ STATION (5) / (6)
BOOK
(2) (3)
# COST COST
COMPONENT/ PER
SECTION SECTION
1
1,816
63,560
70,000
2
3,650
76,650
'40 137
35.00
8%
3.25
21
2%
2,000
(4)
COST/FACILITY
$135,000
63,560
5,085
1,145
$ 432,290
$ 202,790
76,650
1,533
3,464
10.000
$ 249,437
2
147,219
- 40-
JAIL
POPU~ATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 19951
Service Recipients: X
Service Area: X
Service Period:
X
Ail County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
Source of Standard:
0.0033 beds per capita (1)
Collier County Sheriff's Office
Standard
0.0031 beds/capita
0.0010 beds/capita
0.0029 beds/capita
Other Standards for Reference
Source
current Level of Collier
County Service
(2)
Lee County (3)
Seminole County (4)
(3.)
Based on increase in average daily jail population through
September 1992 at same rate as part 21 months (August 1985 -
January 1987)
(2) 565 beds - 182,501 peak population @ 9/30/87
(3)
(4)
Lee County CI?: 1986-87
service level)
- 1990-91, p.156, (based on 1986
Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986.
407.. 138
- 41-
aAIL
LEVEL OF SERVICE SIANDARDI
POPULAIION BEOS
FISCAL CO-WiDE REOUIREO
)EAR PEAK 0.003~0
.00)) BEDS PER CAPIIA
BEDS BEDS SURrLUSI VALUE OR
PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHCY) (COST) AT
IN CIP $22,000
68-69 21Q2)0 6?4 641
6~-IO 22713d 750 6tl
t2-13 269527 BBS MO0 1,041 112 $,33),200
94-95 29~773 476 1,041 65 1,427,800
95-% $08849 i,019 1,04i 22 47%600
%-97 $2192~ 1,062 ~,~4! 1211 (470,8D~1
97-78 ))5011 1,1(16 1,(14!
Ia-ii 348097 [,Iqg 1,041 (106) (2,369,400)
IIBE PERIOD
BEDS BEDS BEDS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
POPULATION : REOUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCYI (COST) AT
(PEAK) .O03)/CAPITA IH CIP 122,O001UNIT
PRESENT lO
9130l~0 227L30 750 0
5 YEAR 6RO¥1H
10190-9195 68643 227 400
5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 2~5773 976 400
2ND 5-¥R 6ROMTH 6552) 216 0
JO YEAR TOTAL
iOISO-I/O0 Z6t2% i,lg2 400
641 (109] i2,367,000)
400 173 3,614,800
l,O(i 65 1,427,B00
0 (2i6)
l,')ai (15i) (3,~26,600)
139
- 42 -
~LAN AREA NAME
North Naples
Central Naples
Golden Gate
East Naples
South Naples
Marco
Royal Faka-Palm
Creek
Rural Estates
Urban Estates
Corkscrew
Immokalee
Big Cypress
Countywide Total
SUMMARY OF JAIL INVENTORY
(Beds)
(2) (3) (4)
USABLE @ ADD BY
NO. 9/30/89 9/30/90
1
2
3
4 469
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
172
641
(5)
ADD BY
9/30/91
(6)
USABLE
TOTAL
469
172
641
- 43 -
JAIL
COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
A. Structure (modular cell)
(2) (3)
# COST COST
COMPONENT/ PER
SECTION SECTIOn{
1 $22,000
(4)
COST/FACILITY
(2) x (3~
$ 22,000
Be
Equipment & Furniture
(per cell)
C. Land (per cell)
(7) AVERAGE COST PER BED
(1 Bed/Cell)
Cost of Additional Beds
in existing cell
N/A
N/A
$ 22,000
1 375 $ 375
- 44 -
LIBRARY BUILDINGS
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30~ 1995:
1. Service Recipients: X
2. Service Area: X
3. Service Period:
Ail County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
0.33 Square feet per capita
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
Other Standards for Reference
0.19 sq. ft./capita
0.31 sq.ft./capita
0.60 sq.ft./capita
0.4 - 0.5 sq.ft./capita
Source
Current Level of Collier County
Service
Lee County CIP
Florida Library Association
Wheeler-Goldhor formula
Based on 50% increase over present level of service
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(2) 28,500 sq.ft/148,722 population as of 9/30/86
(4)
Lee County CIP: 1986-87
service level)
- 1990-91, p.159, (based on 1986
Standards and Guidelines for Florida public Library Service~
May 1985, p.14.
Wbee~eF and Goldhor's Practical A~ministration of publiG
Libraries, 1981, p.405
- 45 -
LIBRARY gUILOItlG5
LEVEL OF SERVICE SrAtIDARD: 0.3.3 50UARE FEE[/EAPIIA
POPULAIIOH SOUARE FEET SQUARE FEEt SOUAFlE FEET
FISCBL FO-WIDE REOUIR[D PLA~IHED AVAILABLE
YEAR M£IGHTED AVG. 0.3~000 IN CIP
88'89
69-90 185~76~
9[-92 207~B00
92'93 2L9,612
73-74 230,B3~
95'9& 252,807
%-97
97'98 274,?~0
98-99 285~7¢L
99'00 29~61~
12 538 9,300
79806
83 426
81 048
TO
94 295
77,949
%000
~7,400
34,000
59,800
61,800
71 lO0
11 I00
80 100
80 100
80
8(' 10o
80100
SURFLUSI VALUE OR
(DEFICIENCYI (COSII AT
1115.27
(29,~27)
15,1~7l
16,174)
(~,436l
IS,07&)
294
(~,;261
(6,948)
C10,5711
(14,1951
(3,[47,0781
(592 1881
(780 8~9)
(165 758)
(585 0991
33
(38~
(800.942)
1i~2J8.4%1
I1~6~6,2001
(2~057~489)
lll~ ~ERIOD
SQUARE FEE1 GgUARE FEET $OUARE FEET SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
PO~ATIOIJ REOU]RED ¢LANHED AVAILABLE (OEHCIENCY) (CDST) AT
(WEIGHTED AVG.) 0 IN C[P $H5.27
PRESENT TO
~1501~0
~ ~AR 6ROYTH
5-TEAR SUITOTAL
2N~ 5oYR 6RO~H
JO YEAR TOTAL
185,763
67,044
241,835
54,;81
296,816
61,S02 6,600 34,000 (27,302) 13~147~018]
18,504 46,100 4b,lO0 27,596 ~,181,014
79,806 52,100 80,100 294
J8,144 0 0 (18,144) [2,091,424)
97,949 52,700 80,100 (17~8491 (2,057,489)
- 46
(~)
PLAN AREA NA~E
North Naples
Central Naples
Golden Gate
East Naples
South Naples
Marco
Royal Faka-Palm
Creek
Rural Estates
Urban Estates
Corkscrew
Immokalee
Big Cypress
SUMMARY OF LIBRARY BUILDINGS INVEFrORY
(Square Feet)
(2) (3) (4)
USABLE @ ADD BY
NO. 9/30/89 9/30/90
1 4,000
2 9,800
3 4,000
4
5 (1,100)* 6,600
6 5,600
7
(5) (6)
ADD BY USABLE
9/30/91 TOTAL
4,000
25,800 35,600
4,000
8
9
10
11
12
6,600
5,600
4,000 4,000
Countywide Total
27,400 6,600 25,800 59,800
Not counted in totals because this library will be replaced by
the new facility in the same planning area. This is a leased
facility.
- 47 -
LIBRARY BUILDING
COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
~OST COMP. ONENT
A. Structure (sq.ft.)
B. Design (% of structure)
C. Land (acres)
D. Parking (spaces)
E. Shelving (sections)
F. Equipment (items)
(5) TOTAL COST
(6) SQUARE FEET IN AVERAGE
LIBRARY
(7) AVERAGE COST PER SQUARE
FOOT (5)/(6)
(2) (3)
# COST COST PER
COMPONENT COMPONENT
10,000 93.40
934,000 8%
1 - 2 Donated
50 300
250 300
60 900
(4)
COST/FACILITY
(2) X (3)
$ 934,000
74,720
0
15,000
75,000
54.000
$ 1,152,720
10,000
115.27
- 48 -
LIBRARY COLLECTION
NOTEs
The CCPC citizen's Advisory Committee recommended excluding the
library collection from the Capital Improvement Element of the
County's Comprehensive Plan.
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
1. Service Recipients: X
2. Service Area: X
3. Service Period:
'X
Ail County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
1.0 books per capita
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
Other Standards for Reference
Standard
0.99 volumes/capita
1.23 volumes/capita
1.50 volumes/capita
1.15 volumes/capita
1.00 volumes/capita
1.00 volumes/capita
1.50 volumes/capita
Source
current Level of Collier County (1)
Service
Lee County CIP (2)
Lee County Comp. Plan (3)
1986 average of'7 systems (Brevard,
Pasco, Sarasota, Seminole, Volusia,
Central Florida Regional, & West
Florida Regional)
Seminole County (4)
Florida Library Association (5)
Level B for libraries serving
100,000 - 600,000 population
Level C for libraries serving
100,000 - 600,000 populatioD
(1) 148,000 volumes/148,722 population @ 9/30/87
(2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 4990-91, p.159, (based on 1986
statewide average service level)
(3) Lee County Comprehensive PlaD, p.28
(4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986
(5) StaDdards and Guidelines for Florida Public Library Services,
May, 1985.
- 49 -
LIBRARY COLLEC1 lOlt
LEVEL OF SERVICE SIAtI~ARD: l.O BOOK rjr CAPlrA
FOPULA[IO~I COLL[ET I0~1 COLLECTION COL~[CIIO~ ~URPLUS/ V~LU[ OR
FISCAL CO-WiOE REOUiREO PLAtlNEO AVAILABLE (OEF'ICIE~CY) (COST) A1
YEAR ~EIGHTED AVG. 1.~0000 IN CIP 136.20
BS-Bt 171,5~B 17J,598 I?),O00 21,402 77q,752
69-90 185,763 18~,765 10,600
90-91 1%,780 1~6,180 lO,BOO 214,4150 17,620 657,844
91'92 207,800 ?07,800 6,8)0
92'9) 219,612 2i9,8~2 6,650 228,100 9,288 300,026
93'94 250,836 2~0,8~6 &,B)O 234,9)0 4,114 148,927
94-95 241,855 241,855 6,B)O 241,800 (3)) ([,2675
96-97 26),783 263,783 2(1,B00 (21,9855 (775,7855
97-98 27¢,760 274,760 2(1,B~0 (32,960) (1,193,1525
98-99 285,741 285,741 241,B00
97-00 296,816 29~,81& 241,B00 (55,016) (1,991,5795
TI~E PERIOD
COLLECTIDN CULLECTIOH COLLECTION SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
POPULATIOH t REOUIREO PLAIINED AVAILABLE (~EFICtENCY) (COST) AT
(NEIGNTEO AVG.) I.O/CAPITA IN CIP $)6.2O/UNIT
PRESENT TO
~150190 185,763
5 )EAR 6ROWIH
10/90-?195 67,044
5'YEAR SUBTOTAL 241,835
2NO 5'YR 6RONTN 5(,981
JO YEAR TOTAL
IO/~O'?/O0 296,8i6
18),763 10,600 203,600 17,B37 645,699
67,044 38,2,)0 58,200 (28,844)
241,8~5 4B,BO0 -Zql,BO0 [II,O0?)
5q,981 0 0 [44,00~) 11,593,1261
296,816 48,800 241,B00 (55,0165 [1,971,579)
MOLE: The unit cost of $36.20 represents the cost to expand the library collection,hile periodically replacing
existing volumes due to wear, loss, etc.
- 50 -
SUMMARY OF LIBRARY COLLECTION INVENTORY
(Books)
PLAN AREA NME
North Naples
Central Naples
Golden Gate
East Naples
South Naples
Marco
Royal Faka-Palm
Creek
Rural Estates
Urban Estates
Corkscrew
Immokalee
Big Cypress
Countywide Total
(2) (3) (4)
IN PLACE &
USABLE @ ADD BY
NO. 9/30/89 9/30/90
1 20,600 1,000
2 98,000 5,000
3 20,100 1,000
4 13,000 1,500
5
6 23,500 1,500
7 2,500 100
8
9
10
11
12
15,300 500 700
193,000 10,600 10,800
(5) (6)
ADD BY USABLE
9/30/91 TOTAL
1,000 22,600
5,000 108,000
1,000 22,100
1,500 16,000
1,500 26,500
100 2,700
16,500
214,400
LIBRARY COLLECTION COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
A. Book
(2) (3)
# COST COST PER
COMPONENT COMPONENT
(4)
COST/FACILITY
(2) x (3)
$ 36.20
- 51 -
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF BEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
Service Recipients: X
Service Area: X
Service Period: X
Ail County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
2.58 square feet per capita
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
(based on County's Master Plan)
Other Standards for Reference
Standard Source
2.46 sq.ft/capita Collier County present level of (1)
service (1987)
Includes offices, courts, customer/public service areas, other
county employee work space, all elected officials and the Health
Department. Excludes temporary or leased space and facilities
that are presented in other parts of this study: EMS Stations,
Fire Stations, Libraries, Recreation Facilities, Water and Sewer
Treatment Plants, and the Jail.
(1) 325,240 sq.ft./132,084
- 52 -
FISCAL
YEAR
B~-90
90-91
92-93
97-98
9B-99
99-00
99-00
TIBE PERIOD
PRESEN1 TO
?130190
YEAR 6ROWTH
5-YEAR SUBTOTAL
2HO 5-YR 6ROWTH
lO YEaR TOTAL
10190-9100
60VERffHEIlr DUILD[NGS
LEVEL OF SERVICE SIAIIOARO: 2.58 SOUARE FEET PER CAFITA
POPULATIOFI SOUARE FEET SOUARE FEET SQUARE FEEl
CO-WIDE REOUIREO PLANNEO AVAILABLE
PER~AliENI 2,58000 IN
152
165
175
185
561
)65
344
195 325
205 30?
215 268
225 205
235 Iq)
245 084
253 02B
265 057
2~5 7~B
393
426
(52
47B
503,
52?
555
606
632
657
683
608,
607 322,748
701 11%000 44L,746
442 5B,O00 499,74B
1BB 15~000 514,748
9)? 514,748
697 514,748
)91 514,748
029 514,748
66? 5L4,748
317 514,74B
972 514,74B
B47 514,748
204 514,74B
SURFLU5! VALUE OR
(DEFICJENCY) (COST) AT
$127,07
(70,B57)
15,047
41,306
36 561
10 810
16~ 2BI)
(~1 721)
(117 567{
(14I 224)
(i69,079)
(9~ 456)
(9,145,823)
J,~42,1i6
6,i05,82~
4,718,8H
1,395,i82
(5,245,844)
{6,554,876)
(11,g64,231)
(15,174,592)
(18,485,747)
(21,825,621)
SOUARE FEET SOUARE FEET SOUARE FEET SURPLUS/ VAL~ OR
POPULATION REOUIREO PLAHHED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT
(CO-WIDE PER~) 2,SB/CAPITA IN CIP II2?.07/UNIT
i75,)65 452,442 171,01)0 499,746 47,)0& 6,105,824
49,840 128,587 15,000 -' 15,000 (113,587) (14,660,700)
225,205 581,029 172,000 514,74B (6&,2811 (6,554,876)
iO,5)l 27,175 0 0 (27,175) (~,507,490)
2)5,7)8 608,204 192,000 514,748 (93,456) (12,062,)66)
53
SUMMARY OF GOVERNMENT BUILDING8 INVENTORY
(Square Feet)
(1)
PLAN AREA NAME
North Naples
Central Naples
Golden Gate
East Naples
South Naples
Marco
Royal Faka-Palm
Creek
Rural Estates
Urban Estates
Corkscrew
Immokalee
Big Cypress
Countywide Total
(2) (3)
USABLE @
NO. 9/30/89
1 2,247
2 40,000
3 7,000
4 210,187
5 17,210
6 3,710
7 6,288
(4) (5)
ADD BY ADD BY
9/30/90 ~_~
119,000 46,000
8
9
10
11
12
(6)
USABLE
TOTAL
2,247
40,000
7,000
375,187
17,210
3,710
6,288
36,106 12,000 48,106
322,748 119,000 58,000 499,748
Includes offices, courts, customer/public service areas, other
county employee work space, all elected officials and the Health
Department. Excludes temporary or leased space and facilities
that are presented in other parts of this study: EMS Stations,
Fire Stations, Libraries, Recreation Facilities, Water and Sewer
Treatment Plants, and the Jail.
- 54 -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING
COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
(2) (3)
# COST COST PER
COMPONENT COMPONENT
(4)
COST/FACILITY
(2~ X (3)
Structure (sq.ft.)
Furniture (open
office system)
$88.00 * (1)
21.00 * (2)
CJ
Design (% of structure
& furniture)
70 10% 7.35
Land (provided by Real
Property)
8.00
Parking (1 per 250 sq.
ft. of structure)
0.004 1125 4.7~
AVERAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT
$129.07(3) {4) {6)
(1) Includes DiDimal landscaping, carpet tile and window covering.
Does not include energy management systems, phones, or
computers.
(2) Furniture costs are based on open office furniture systems, in
accordance with County policy, excludes interior demountable
partitions.
(3) Includes meeting or exceeding fire code, and meeting or
exceeding all handicapped codes (handicap "friendly"). (Does
not include sprinklers).
(4) This is a square footage cost estimate and is subject to the
type of occupant programmed into the structure. (Standard
office space).
(5) These figures are based on the following:
A. Recently completed construction projects at the Government
Complex.
B. Estimations on projects currently being designed by
multiple architectural firms on contract with the Board.
C. Reviewed by prominent Naples Architectural firms.
D. Reviewed by the largest architectural firm in the State of
Florida.
E. Compared to major projects completed nationally.
F. Are compatible with government construction in other
counties in close proximity to Collier County by our
Growth Management Consultant.
(6) Single story structure.
- 55 -
DRAINAGE
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30~ 1995:
Service Recipients:
Service Area:
Service Period:
Ail County Residents
Other:
County-wide
Other:
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE: A
County Surface Water Management Systems:
Future "private" developments - Applicable
South Florida Water Management District
requirements found in Chapter
40E.40.302(4) (a & b), and 40E.-4.091(1) (a)
incorporating by reference Section 3.2.1 et
seq. "Water Quantity" of Basis of Review
for Surface Water Management Permit
Applications Within the South Florida Water
Management District, April 1987). (Present
requirements are a 25-year, 3-day storm
event except.)
B
Existing "private" developments and
existing or future public drainage
facilities - those existing levels of
service to be identified (by design storm
return frequency event) by April 30, 1989
utilizing the findings of the completed
portions of the Water Management Master
Plan.
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee and the
Collier County Stipulated Settlement
Agreement with DCA.
Other Standards for Reference
Standard
0.0025 miles/capita
0.0006 miles/capita
Source
Current Collier County miles/capita (1)
Lee County CIP (2)
(1) 311 miles/123,893 population as of October 1, 1986.
(2)
Lee County CIP: !986-87 - ~990-9%, p.231 (based on 1986
urban unincorporated service level)
- 56 -
CALCULATION OF DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS
1990-91 - 1994-95
No standard has been identified for drainage canals and structures
that "... indicate(s) the capacity per unit of demand ..." as
required by State regulations. Drainage flows are traditionally
measured by hydrologists in terms of "design storms" (e.g., lO-year
25-year, 100-year storms, etc.). Collier County has prepared a
Stormwater Master Plan which identifies, at a planning level degree
of accuracy, the ability of the various public water management
facilities to pass the expected stormwater flows from various
design storms. These design storms were based upon the existing
and future land use for the various parts of the County.
The project totals listed below (in lieu of the usual "Calculation
of Requirements") reflect the recommended plan of action to improve
the public water management system facilities for the years
1990-1995. These improvements are identified in the Stormwater
Master Plan as a part of a 20-year program.
PROJECT
District No. 6 (Lely)
Gordon River Extension
Cocohatchee River System
Main Golden Gate System
Henderson Creek Basin
Faka-Union Basin
Southern Coastal Basin
Barron River Basin
Countywide Total
$ 9,116,000
8,116,000
260,000
635,000
160,000
265,000
233,000
53,000
$ 18,838,000
~00~
'40
- 5? -
(1)
Primary
Secondary
Countywide Total
SUMMARY OF DRAINAGE INVENTORY
(miles)
(2)
CANAL
(miles)
9/30/90
228
83
311
(3)
STRUCTURES
(number)
9/30/90
51
DRAINAGE CANAL COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS
(1)
COST COMPONENT
A. Design
B. Land
C. Facility
AVERAGE COST
PER MILE
(2) (3) (4)
PRIMARY SECONDARY PRIMARY
CANAL CANAL STRUCTURE
COSTS COSTS cOSTS
$ 35,000 $ 20,000 $ 50,000
125,000 110,000 50,000
340,000 170,000 300,000
$ 500,000 $ 300,000 $ 400,000
(5)
SECONDARY
STRUCTURE
COSTS
$ 25,000
25,000
200.000
$ 250,000
40 , i55
- 58 -
PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995:
1. Service Recipients: ~ Ail County Residents
Other:
2. Service Area: X County-wide
Other:
3. Service Period: X
Permanent Pop. =
Peak Period Pop. =
Weighted Average
of Permanent and
Peak =
215,268
295,773
241,835
STANDARD OF SERVICE:
1.2882 acres of community park land/1000
pop. : 2.9412 acres of regional park land/
1000 pop. : $122.00 of recreation
facilities inventory value per capita *
Source of Standard:
CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee
(1)
TYPE OF FACILITY
(2) (3) (4) (5)
REQ'D FOR
STA/~DkRD 9/30/95
PER 1000 POP. VA~LUE TOTAL
PERSONS ~15,268 PER UNIT VALUE
kmphitheater
Baseball Fields
Basketball/Volleyball
Bicycle Trails: Miles
Children's' Playgrounds
Community Centers
Community Pool
Fitness Station Trails
Football/Soccer Fields
Multi-purpose Facility
Jogging Trails: Miles
Olympic Pool
Picnic Pavilions
Racquetball Courts
Shuffleboard Courts
Softball Fields
Tennis Courts
Track and Field
Boat Ramps
TOTAL
0.0118 2.5 100,000 250,000
0.0353 7.6 420,000 3,192,000
0.1765 -38.0 17,500 665,000
0.0553 11.9 28,900 343,910
0.1059 22.8 22,500 513,000
0.0353 7.6 640,000 4,864,000
0.0059 1.3 600,000 780,000
0.0353 7.6 50,000 380,000
0.0353 7.6 225,500 1,710,000
0.0059 1.3 1,300,000 1,690,000
0.0353 7.6 26,400 200,640
0.0059 1.3 2,300,000 2,990,000
0.0706 15.2 28,000 425,600
0.1412 30.4 34,200 1,039,680
0.0706 15.2 10,500 159,600
0.0706 15.2 220,000 3,344,000
0.0706 15.2 30,000 456,000
0.0059 1.3 191,500 248,950
0.1059 22.8 180,300 4.110,840
27,363,180
Value per capita (Value/215,2~ po~tion)
$ 127.11
- 59 -
FACILITIES PER 1,000 PERSONS
STANDARDS
TYPE OF FACILITY
Amphitheater
Baseball Fields
Basketball/Volleyball
Courts
Bicycle Trails: Miles
Children's' Playgrounds
Community Centers
Community Park: ac
Community Pool
Fitness Station Trails
Football Fields
Multi-purpose Facility
Jogging Trails: Miles
Olympic Pool
Picnic Pavilions
Racquetball Courts
Regional Park: acres
Shuffleboard Courts
Soccer Fields
Softball Fields
Tennis Courts
Track and Field
Boat Ramps - Freshwater
Boat Ramps - Saltwater
Boat Ramps - Combined
COUNTY FRPA*
STANDARD STANDARD
0.0118 0.04
0.0353 0.17
0.1765 0. 2
0.0553 1.00
0.1059
0.0353
1.2882 2.00
0.0059
0.0353 0.10
0.0353 0.25
0.0059
0.0353 0.50
0.0059 0.04
0.0706
0.1412
2.9412
0.0706
0.0353
0.0706
0.0706
0.0059
0.0529
0.1118
0.1059
OTHER
0.17 (2)
0. 2 (4)
O. 4 (2)
0. 2 (4)
1 (5)
0.067(6)
2 (2)
o. 13 (5)
0.25 (z)
0.05 (4)
0.04 (2)
0.05 (4)
o. 5 (s)
0.10 o.
0.05 (4)
20 20 (2)
5 (3)
0.20 0. 2 (2)
o. 5
0.25 0.25 (2)
o. i (4)
-0.30 0.17 (2)
o. 2 (4)
0.50 o. 5 (2)
0.25 (3)
0. 2 (7)
0.05 (4)
25 ** 3. 3 (8)
25 ** 3. 3 (8)
3. 3 (a)
* FRPA = Florida Recreation and Parks Association
** Standards are per 1,000 registered boats
(Z) Collier County Comprehensive Plan quoting Outdoor Recreation in
Florida. 1981 as a guideline.
(3) Lee County CIP: 1986-97 - 1990-91 (based on Co. Comp. Plan)
(4) National Recreation and Parks Association
(5) Kansas City, Missouri
(6) Jackson, Tennessee
(?) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards,"
October 17, 1986
(8) Florida Department of Natural Resources: 1 lane/300 boats
157
- 60 -
2~-~ay-90
rARES AND RECREATIDN:AJ',PHITHE3iTERS
LEVEL DF ~EI~]I~ STAMI)AR}:.OIIBliO{)O POI'.
POPULATION AMPHITHEATERS AI~'HiTHEATERS
FXSCAL CO-¥]DE REOUIRED PLANNED
YEAR PERHANENT O.O0001IB IN CIP
88-89 15256i 1.8
89-90 165188 2
90-9i 175365 2.1
91-92 185344 2.2
9??3 195125 2.]
9]-94 205]09 2.4
9q-95 215268 2.5
95-9& ' 225205 2.7
%-97 235143 2.8
97-98 ' 245084 2.9
98-99 255028 3
99-00 265057 3.1
TI~E PERIOD
PRESENT TO
'~/30/90
POPULATIDH R£OUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-~IDE $ VALUE AT PLAW~ED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY}
PEr~nHENT $100,O00/UNIT VAL~ VALUE
SURPLUS/ REQUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
AMPHITHEATERS{DEFICIENCY) $ VALUE AT PtANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
AVAILABLE 100,000 VALUE VALUE
1.0 (O.B) 180,000 0 100,000 {80.0005
1.0 (1.0{ 200 000 0 100,000 (i00.000l
2.0 (0.1) 210000 100,000 200000 (I0.000)
2.0 (0.2) 220 000 0 200 000 (20000)
2.0 (0.35 230,000 0 200 000 (30 000)
2.0 (0.45 240000 0 200 000 {40 000)
2.0 (0.5) ; 250.000 0 200 000 (50 000)
2.0 (0.7} 270 000 0 200 000 (70 000)
2.0 (0.8) 280 000 0 200 000"* (B0 000)
2.0 (0.9) 290 000 0 200 000 (90 000)
2.0 (i.0) 300 000 0 200 000 (100 000)
2.0 (1.15 310 000 0 200 000 (110,0005
165,388 --200,000 0 100,000 {I00,000}
5 YEAR GROWTH
10190 - 9/95
49,880 50,000 i00,000 I00,000 50,000
5 YEAR 5'UBTOTAL 2i5,268
250,000 1~,~ 200,000 (50,0005
iO YEAR TOTAL 265,057
310,~ JN,~q)~) 2~,0H (110,000{
PARKS AND RECREAHON:6ASEBALL FIELD
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: .035511000 PO~
POPULATION BASEBALL FIELD BASE&AU. FIELD BASEBALL SURPLUS/ REOUIRED CIP TOTAL
FISCAL COoWIDE REOUIRE~ PI..AIQI~D FIELDS (D~ICIENC¥) I VALUE AT rLANNED A?AILA~E
YEAR. PERAAI~NT O.bOOO353 IK LIP AVAXLABLE 420,000 VALUE VALUE
88-89 152561 ~.4 I 4.0 :1.4) 2,266,000 420,000
89-~0 165~86 ~.~ I 4.0 (~.85 2,43~,000 ~20,000 1.680,000
~-?! 175~65 6.: 2 6.0 (0.2} ~.60~.000 840,000 :,520,000
.. 9. IB.~44 6.0 (0.5) 2.730,000
~ · 6.0 {0.9) 2,6?6,000 G 2,52~,0~0
~2-~ I~325 -..
92-~t 20530C ?.2 L.O (1.2] 3,024,000 0 2.52¢.¢0~
9~-?~ 2!526~ ?.~ 6.0 {1.6) :,!{2,000 0 2,52~,007
?~-~ 225205 i.C £.0 (l.?) : 3,~16,000 0 2?)20,000
94-~7 235143 £.~ 6.0 (2.~) 3,486,000 O
~;-96 2450B4 £.? 6.0 [2.7} 3~654~00P 0 2,520.000
9E-9¢ 25102e ~ 6.0 ~3.(,] 3,780,00(, 0
9~-00 265057 ~.~ 6.0 {3.4) 3,~4~,000 0 2.520,00<
PRESEI;T TO
~/30/?0
['OPULATION REgU1RR~ CZ? TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-{IDB t VALUE AT rtflJ{aZP AVAILA6LE (DEFICIERCY)
~E~AH[~T 1426!,O06:/U~IT VALUE VALUE
940.000 2,520,000 ~ (B4,0005
SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY)
(588,0005
(64,000)
(~76,0005
(~C, 4,0005
,7.~,(00,
6966,000)
61,134,(,00!
(1.260,006')
5 YEAR. 6ROgTH
10190 - ~195
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL
2ND 5-YR 6ROYTH
10 YEAR TOTAL
49,840 714,~00 0 0 6714~0005
215,266 ' 3,316,000 640,000 2,~20~000 (798,0005
47,7B? 630,000
265,057 3,q4e,ooo 84~,{X~ 2t520,000 61,428,0005
PARKS Al(8 RECIIEAIIOK:IICYCLE TPAILS
LD~ OF ERVICE STANDARD: .0553/1000 POP.
FISCAL
YE~
POPULATION BICYCLE TRAILS
CO-NIDE REOUI~D
PERmUI~J(T 0.0
IICYCt. E TRAILS BICYCLE TRAIL SURPt. USI
PLANNED AVAILAALE (DEFICIEXCI'I
Iii CIP
88-89 152561 6.4 0.? 50.? 42.5
99-90 t65368 9.1 6.7 57.6 46,5
90°9! 175365 9.7 lO.O 67.6 57.9
91-92 185344 10.2 lO.O 77.6 67.4
92-?~ 195~25 10.8 9.0 86.6 75.8
93-94 205~09 11.4 9.& %.2 84.6
94-95 215268 11.9 %.2 84.3
95-96 225205 12.5 96.2 85.7
%-97 235143 13.0 96.2 65.2
97-99 245064 13.6 96.2 82.6
98-99 255028 14.l 96.2 62.J
99-00 2~5057 J4.7 9&.2 81.5
POPULATION REOUI~D CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-M]DE S VACUE AT PtANN£D AVAILA~E [DEFICIENCY)
PERMANENT S28,900/UNIT VALUE VALUE
[75,365 280,233 288,900 1,952,964 1,672,731
TIME PERIOD
PRESENT TO
~/30190
5 YEAR 6ROiITX
10190 - 9/95 47,840 80,992 626,254 826,254 745,362
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 225,205 361,i25 1,ii5,i54 2,779,2i6 2,418,093
2kl 5-11} I~DMTH 39,852 &3,550 0 0 (~,5581
lO YEAI TOTAL 265,057 424,683 1,115,154 2,779,218 2,354,555
REOUIRED CIP TOTAL
VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILA8LE
$28,890 VALUE VALUE
242,676
262 899
294 678
312 012
329 346
543 791
36i 125
375 570
392 904
407.34?
424
26,00i 1,470,50i
i93,565 i,664,064
I OK~ o/J
288,900 .,.--,,-,
288,900 2,241,864
260,010 2,501,874
277,~44 2,779,218
0 2,779,219
0 2,779,218
0 2,779,2i8
0 2,779,2i8
0 2,779,218
0 2,779,218
SU{CPLUSl
[DEFICIENCY)
1,227,825
1,401,165
I,&72,7~1
1,947,18}
2,189,862
2,449,872
2,425,427
2,418,093
2,403,&48
2,38&,314
2,371,869
2,354,535
~.'
21
PARICS AND RECREATIDM:~OAT RAAPS
LEVEL DF SERVICE STAIIIARD: .1059 Llg~l 1000 POP.
POPULATION BOAT
FISCAL CO-¥IDE REOUIRD
YEAN PERI,ANENT 0.0001059
88-89 1525&1 l&.2
89-90 1&5386 17.5
?0-91 17536~ 16.6
91-92 185344 19.6
92-93 195325 20.7
93-94 205309 21.7
94095 215268 22.8
95-96 225205
96-97 235143 24.9
97-9B 245084 26
98-99 255028 27
99-00 265057 28.1
TI~ PERIOD
PRESENT TO
9/30/?0
BOAT BAItPS
PLAJOIED
IN Cfip
BOAT RAIIPS SURPLUS/ ~OUIRED
AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) $ VALUE AT
7.0
7.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
18.0
JB.O
18.0
18.0
16.0
16.0
9.2)
10.5)
6.6)
5.6)
4.7)
3.7)
4. B:)
5.6)
6~9)
(8.0)
(9.0]
(10.1)
POPULATION REOUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-¥IDE S VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PER~C~XENT tIBO,262/UNIT VALUE VALUE
175,365 .. 3,352,82]
901,310 2,16]~144 41,189,729)
180,262
2,920,244
3,15i,585
3,911,685
4,109,974
4,290,236
4,488,524
4,686,812
4,067,074
5,065,362
CIP TOTAL
PLANNED AVAILADLE
VALUE : VALUE
SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY)
0 1,261,834
0
901,310 2,163,144
360,524 2,525,66B
360,524 2,884~192
360,524 3,244,716
0 3,244,716
0 3,244,7~6
0 3,244,716
0 3,244,716
0 3,244,716
0 3,244,716
(1,65B,410)
41,189,729)
(1,009,467)
(B47,231)
(666,969)
(B65,25B)
41,045,520)
(1,243,BOB)
41,442,096)
41,622,358)
41,820,646).q..
t
5 YEAR 6RONTH
10/90 - 9/95 49,940
5 YEAR SUITOTAL 215,266
2ND 5'-TR GJtOIITH 49,789
10 YEAR TOTAL 265,057
937,~2 1,081,572 1,081,572 144,210
4,290,2~ 1,982,882 3,244,716 41,045,520)
775,~?7 0 0 4775,127)
5,0&$,~2 1,962,88/ 3m244,716 (1,6Z0,646)
21-Ray-?O
PARKS AND RECREATIOII:COI~IJIITT CEJ(TER$
LEVEL OF SEJWIC~ STAIQ)AP.D: .035311000 POP.
POPULATION CDIIR.CEIITERS CO;lt. CEIITERS COI~RUNITY SURPLUS/
FISCAL CO-¥IDE REOUIREI PL.AJII~D CENTERS [DEFICIENCY)
YEAR PERRANE#T 0.000~35.1 Il CIP AVAILABLE
88-89 J5256! 5.4 2.0 (3.4)
67-?0 165388 5.6 2.0 (3.8)
?0-?! 175~&5 6.2 4 6.0 (0.21
9J-92 185544 A.5 6.0 (0.51
Y2-93 195325 6.Y 6.O
93-94 205309 7.2 ! 7.0 (0.2)
94-95 215268 7.6 ?.0 (0.6):
95-96 225205 7.9 7.0
96-97 235!43 8.3 7.0
97-98 245084 6.7 7.0 (1.7)
98-99 255028 9 7.0 (2.0)
~9-00 265057 9.4 7.0 (2.4!
TInE PERIOD
PRESENT TO
9130190
POPULATION REOUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-M]DE $ VALUE AT PLAJQ(ED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PERnANENT $640,O001UNIT VALUE VALUE
175,~65 ~,968,000 2,560,000 3,BqOpO00 -- {128,000)
5 YEAR GRO¥'rH
10170 - ?/95
5 1T. AR SUJTOTAL
21~ 5-YR GROk'*[H
10 1T. AN TOTAL
49,B40 1,088,000 640,000 640,000 (448,0000)
215,268 5,056,000 3,Z00,000 4,480,000 (576,00GJ
2&5,057 6,016,000
REQUIRED
$ VALUE AT
640,000
PLAJ~FJ)
VALUE
AVA, ..a.,~E
' VAL~
3,456,000
3,712,000
$,?68,000
4,160,000
4,416,000
4,608,000
4,864,000
5,05&,OOO
5,312,000
5,568,000
5,760,000
6,016,000
0
0
2,560,000
0
0
640,000
0
0
0
0
o
0
1,280,000
J,280,000
3,840,000
2,840,000
3,840,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
4,480,000
SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY)
(2,176,000)
[2,432 000)
(128 000)
(320 000)
(576,000)
(128000)
(384 O00l
(576 000!
(832 000)
(J,088,000)
[1,280,000)
(1,536,000)
.PA~S AW~ RECREATIOII:COMUNITY ?alii: llCaiS
LEVEL ~ $£RYIC[ STAG4~: 1.28e211pe,{ POP.
FISCAL
.PDI'ULAIIDll ~ ~ ACAES CO{~fl ~ "ACRES ~ ~ ACRES S3~PC~I
CD-IIIDE REI]UI~D PLAIIHED ~VAILAIIt.£ ({)F..FICI£NCY !
~..~.~KI 0.0012892 IN CIP
OB-e~ ,~..~! 196.5 188.0
e~-St: .uS.B. 211.1 ~Z.O
~-ml ,,,,t,.'?'~ ' . ~Z.~ 271.0. 12.91
.l-~ ,..,.,l :16.8 221.0 '
~3-~1 , ~c-~ 3~I.I ' 255.0
.. ....... S ...... ~, 0 . .
~-~ _I..~ 377.~
iL-ii- ...... ?O.l (~.11
em_mc ',' ,~' '" ~ 267.(~ ~2B.7)
. ~41.~:
Tlr_: :'rFIO",. ..
:'~':-J'_AI ;O:;CO,q Pt. A:.~i~ C'.,'? ri: AC£:ES ~ P{' ACRES
,._.., r,: REOUIF:E£ ~L:,~;ED A.,,I,AE..£ (L'£FICI£L'CY{
F-~_f ........, Lc,., (.'. <'( 13B~? IN
I,.;%" - ~.'.' ~..~ q ~, :'.30 ~.4 ,,~' ~4 l(n.
5 ¥[~,1.: SU~-TOTRL _,..,.6,'"., c. :77.. 64 287 I0
.... 287
i~O'JIR[~
· . ~$T AT
24,0~
5,114,400
&,028,400
£,~48,00U
COST
IDIAC SURPCbSI
AVAILA~£ (DEFICIENCY{
VALLE
0 4,51Z .... 120q,O00{
O 5,152,000
0 5,152,0(K, (179,200)
7~e,no0 £,120,000 ~l,!O0
76e,¢0(, ~,888,0(,¢
(: 6,888,00~
0 C,eSi,O00 (~85,800~
PA,~S AND RECREAIIOII:C~I~I1TY POOLS
LEVEL OF S[RVIC~ STANDARDs .005~11000 PDP
FISCAL
POPUCATIOI COI~.POOL$ COI~I.POOLS C0fl~ITY
Cfl-¥IOE REQUIRED PLAIOIED POOLS
PERIMKENT 5.900OOO08'-06 IX CIP AVAILABLE
89-90 165388 1
91-92 185344 1.1
92-93 195325 1.2
9~-~4 205309 1.2
94-95 215268 1.3
95-96 225205 1.3
96-97 235143 1.4
97-~8 245084 1.4
98-~ 255028 1.5
99-00 265057 1.6
FIJR~US/
(DE~ICIENCI'I
REIAIIREI)
$ VALUE AT
$600,000
O.O (o.91
o.0 (l.o)
o.0
o.0 (1.1)
1.o (0.2)
1.0 (0.2)
1.0
l.O (0.3)
1.0 10.41
1.0 (0.4)
1.0 (0.51
1.0 (0.61
540,000
600,000
660,000
720,000
720,000
780,000
780,000
B40,O00
900,000
960,000
TInE P~IOD
PRESENT TO
-9/30/90
POPULATION REQUIRED CIP
CO-¥1DE S VALLE AT PLANED
PERRANEN1 $600,0001~NI! VALUE
175,365 600,000
TOTAL SI~LUS/
AVAILABLE (O~ICIEIIC¥)
VALUE
0 0 (600,000)
CIP
PLAN/ID
VA~:.~
o
o
o
o
6oo,ooo
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
,-~. SURPLUS/
AY~LABCE (DEFICIENCY)
VALUE
o
o
o
0
600,000
6o0~ooo
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
(540 ooo)
(600 00o)
(600 oool
(660 0001
(L2o ooo!
(120,000)
(180 0001
(IBO,O00)
(240r0001
(240 ooo)
(300,000)
(360000)
5 yEAR GR~ITH
10190 - 9195
49,840 180~000
600,0'00 600,~0 420,000
5 YEM SUITOTAL 225,205
780,0~ 600,000 600sO00 (180,0001
10 ~ lOllL 2~5,057 760,000
PARKS AND RECRERTI~:FITNESS TRAILS
LEVEL OF SFd:VICE ST~OARD: .O~5)llOOO P~
PePULATIOff J066I~8 T~IL JOGGllt6 TRAIL JO66IN6 TRAIL SURPLUS/ REQUIRED LIP
FISCAL CO-¥1~E :HILES) REO PLANk'ED KILES (DEFICIENCYI $ VALUE AT PLANNED
YEAF: pE~,ANDIT 0.0~8)T55 1# LIP AVAILABLE 50,000 VALUE
TOTAL S~PLUS/
A?AILABLE (OEFJCIENC¥1
VALbE
es-e~ 152,5&1 5.4 o.o (5.4] 270~J0 ~ 0 (27G~9001
~0-?! !75,~65 ~.~ 2 2.0
~-~ 175,~ 6.9 ~ &.O (~.?1 ~,000 lOU,O(,O ~0,00¢ (~,000)
93-9~ ~6~,307 ?.~ ? 8.0 O.e 3~0,000 100.00~ ~O0,OOO qO,O00
%-9~ 22~,~0~ 7.~ 8.0 0.1 3~00~ 0 400,000 ~000
~-gE 349~0~4 ~.7 ~.0
TI~E PER~O~
PRESENT lO
YEA~ SbBTOTAL --.,.~. ·
~-tR GRO¥I~ 31,B5~ 7~,000 0 0 (75,000)
TEAR TOTAL 2~5,057 4;(,000 4~,(~0 400,000 (70,('00)
·
PARKS AW~ ~CREATIDII:JILILT]-PIJIU'OSE CENTERS
LEVT. L OI= SERVICE STANDAAD: .O0591J. OOe POP.
POPULATION 6Y~ASIU~S 6YNIASlIAtS 6YIINASIUIIS
FISCAL COo¥IDE REDUIREA ~ AVAILABLE
YEAR PERMAWENT 5.9000000E-O& Ill LIP
88-8t 152541 0.1
81-10 165388 !
!~!1 175365 !
11-t2 185344 1.1
92-t3 195325 1.2
93-t4 205309 1.2
94-95 215268
95-96 225205 1.3
96-t7 235143 1.4
17-t8 2454)04 1.4
96-99 255028 1.5
9?-00 265057 1.6
TIE PERIOD
PRESENT TO
9130110
SLqU'LUSI
(DEFICIENCY)
REOUIRED
VALUE AT
1,300,000
0.0 {0.9) 1,170,000
0.0 (1.0) 1,300,000
I 1.0 0.0 1,300,000
1.0 {0.1) 1,430,000
1.0 (0.2) 1,560,000
J.O {0.2) 1,560,000
1.0 (0.3) 1,690,000
l.O ~0.3) 1,690,000
1.0 {0.4) 1,820,000
1.0 (0.4) 1,820,000
1.0 (0.5) 1,950,000
1.0 (0.6) 2,080,000
PoPLq_ATION REOUIRED
CO-WI~ $ VALUE AT
PERAPJ{ENT $I,300,0001~IT
LIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
VALUE VALUE
175,365 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,30&,O00
5 YEAR GROWTH
10/90 - 1/95 4t,840 310,000 0 0 (390,000)
5 YE'Lq S~JITOTAL 2'25,205 1,&90,000 1,34)0,000 1,300,000 (390,000)
2WI 5-Yt 6.qOMTH 39,852 3?0,000 0 (1,3~,0(0)) 310,01)0
lO YF. AR TOTAL 265,057 2,080,000 1,300,000 0 0
CIP TOTAL
P''~N~D AVAILABLE
*~.>E VALU~
0 0
0 0
l,~O0,O00 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
0 1,300,000
S~USI
(DEFICIENCY)
(1,170,000)
(1,300,000)
0
(130,000)
(260,000J
(260,000)
(390,O00J
(390,000)
(520,000J
(520,000)
(650,0001
(7BO,O00)
PAR~,S MD RECREATIO#;JOGBIN6 TRAILS
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD; .05531J000 POP.
POPULATION JOBGING TRAIL JO$BIN6 TRAIL JOGGIN6 TRAIL SURPLUS/
FISCAL CO-NIPE (IIILES) REO PLA~EO I~ILES {DEFICIENCY)
YEAR PERI, ANENT 0.0000353 IN CIP AVAILABLE
88-87 1525&! 5.4 2.1
89-?0 165388 5.8 2.J (.~.7)
90-91 175365 6.2 2.J
~,-9,. 195~25 ~.~ I 4.1
~3-~ 205Z0~ ~.2 I Z. I
94-v5 2152~8 {.~ 5.1
{5-% 225205 7.~ 5.1
%-~ 2~5143 8.3 5.1
~-~8 2450~4 8.~ 5.1
~8-V~ 255028 ~ 5.1
~-00 2&505Y $.4 5.1
TINE PERI00
P~ES£KT TO
~1301~0
POPULATION REUUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-WiDE { VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PERflANENT S26,qOO/UNIT VALUE VALUE
175,365 16Z,680 0 55,440 (~08,240)
5 YEAR GROWTH
10/90 - 9/95 49,640
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 225,205
~D 5-YR 6RONTK 39,852
JO YE~ TOTAL 2&5,057
44,880 79,200 79,200 34,~20
208,560 7~,200 134,640 (7~,720)
39,600 O O
248,1~0 77,2~ 134~640 (i1~,520{
REP"gED CIP TOTAL SU~LUS/
VA~ .. Al PLA~NF.D AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
26,400 VALUE VALUE
142,560
153,120
163.680
171 600
IH2 160
!90 080
200 640
20B
217 120
..? 6BO
237 600
248 160
0 55,440
0 55,440
0 55,440
26,400 81,840
2d,40~ 109,240
2~,400 154.640
0 1~4,640
0 134,640
0 134.640
0 1~4,640
0 i~4,640
0 134,640
(B7 1201
¢108.240)
(B? 760)
(73 920)
(84 460J
(?5,040)
(102,960)
{113,520)
21-tlalf-90
PARRS A~ I~CREATIOII:OLY/I~IC POOL
LEVEL OF SEIWICE STAJG)ARI: .0Q5911004 POP.
POPULATION OLYIIPIC POOLS
FISCAL CO-HIDE REgUIREI
YEAR PERRANEIIT 5.9000000E-06
89-89 152561 0.?
9~-~2 185~44 ~-!
92-93 ~95~25 ~.2
93-94 205309 1.2
94-9~ 2~260
¥5-96 225205 1.3
96-97 235143 1.4
98-99 25~028 1.5
99-00 2&~057 1.6
TI~ PERIOD
PRESENT TO
9/~0/90
OLY~ICPOOLS
PLAJ~
1# CIP
0LYIlPIC POOLS SURPLU~I
AVAILMLE (DEFICIENCY]
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1,0
1.0
1.0
1.0
l.O
1.0
1.0
(0.9i
(1.0)
1.0}
0.1)
0.2!
0.2)
0.$}
0.$)
0.4)
(0.5]
(0.6)
POPULATION REDUIRED CIP
CO-¥ID£ S VALUE AT PLA&qED
P£RXAJ(ENT $2,30O,O00/U?(IT VALUE
175,$65 2,$00~000 0
TOTAL
AVAILAgLE
VALUE
SURPLUS/
(Df_.FICIENCY)
0 (2,:300,000)
REOPlRED
$: ,r ~T
;~$00,000
CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY]
VALUE VALUE :
2t070~000
2,300,000
21530~000
2,760~000
2~760~000
2~990~000
2,990,000
~,qSO,O00
3,&80~000
0
O
0
2,:~o0~000
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
0 (2,070,000)
0 (2~00,000)
2,300,000 (230,000)
2,300,000
2,300,000 (4&O,O00)
21300,000 (690,000)
2~300~000 (670~000)
2~300,000 (920,000}
21300~000 (720~0001
2~00,000 (1,150,000)
2,300~000 (1~80,000)
5 'rEM 6P, Dk'TH
101~ - 9/?5 4?,640 &?O,O00 2t30O,OOO
'S ~ SUBTOTAL 225,205 2,?90,000 2,$00,000
2NI 5-YR 6R~TH $9,652 &90,OOO 0
lO 1TNt TOTAL 2&5,057 ~,&80,(XX) 2~1,lq),OOQ
Z,:X)O,O00 l,&lO,O00
2,300,000
0 (&~O,O00)
2,:~O,Oq)O
21-Ralr-~O
FISC~
YEAR
88-89
89-90
9!-92
95-9&
9&-97
97-'18
99-99
99-00
TINE PERIOD
PRESENT TO
9150190
PAR~ AI~ RECNEATIO~tPI*CXlC PAVILIONS
LEVEL OF S[IWI[~ STAI(Z)NtDt .070&Il000 HiP.
PO~ATICN PICNIC PAV PICNIC PAV PICNIC PAY SURPLUS/
CO-ilDE REOUIF. ED ~ e~'3ILAICE (DEFICIENCY)
{~RJMWEJ(T 0.0~070& IN CIP
REDUZRED
VALUE AT
26,000
1525~1 10.8 ' 1.0 (9.~)
1&5388 11.7 J.O (10.7)
175365 12.4 1.0 (ll.4J
185344 1~.1 l.O (12.1)
i95325 i$.6 i.O (i2.89
205309 14.5 11 12.0
2152&8 15.2 12.0 [3.2)
225205 15.9 12.0 (3.9)
235143 14.6 12.0 (4.&)
245084 17.3 12.0
255029 iB i2.0
2&5057 18.7 12.0 (6.7)
302,400
~27,b00
347,200
366,800
~86,400
406,000
425,600
445,200
464,800
484,400
504,000
523,600
POPULATION REO1JIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-¥1DE t ViV.UE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE [OEFICIENCYJ
PERI~U~ENT S28,000/UNIT VALUE VflLUE
175,365 347,200 0 29,000 [~19,200)
CIP TOTAL . SURPLUS/
PLAXNE] AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
VALUE VALUE
o
o
o
0
o
308,000
o
o
o
o
o
o
28,000
29,000
28,000
26,000
28,000
336,000
356,000
3~6,000
336,000
336,000
336,000
(274 400)
(299 600)
(319 200)
(338 BO0)
(358,400)
(70 ooo}
(89 600}
(lO? 200)
(128 800)
{148 400)
(168,000_~_~'~"~
1187,6001,r.~
I
5 YEAR GROMTH
10190 - 9195
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL
2ND 5'-'(R 6R01fTH
l0 YT.A~ TOTAL
49,840 96,000 508,000 308,04)0 210,000
225,205 445,200 ~06,OQO ~&,000 (109,200J
39,852 78,400 0 0
PARKS At'ID RECREATION:R~BALL COURTS
LEVEL DF SERVICE STARDARI: .1412/1000 POP.
FISCAL
YEAR
POPULATION R8 COURTS Ri COURTS RB COURTS
CO-MIDE REOL"'FB PLARNE.) AVAILABLE
PERMANENT 0-",~,412 IN CIP
BQ-B9 152561 21.5 12.0
89-90 16538B 23.( 16.0
90-~1 175365 24.8 16.0
91-92 185314 26.2 10 26.0
~2-9Z l~'~ 27.6 26.0
93-q( 205Z09 2q 26.0
9(-% 2~5268 ~].4 26.~
%-96 225205 ~I.B 26.0
%-97 2~514~ ~:.2 26.0
97-98 2N5084 M.6 26.0
98-99 :55028 )~ 26.0
99-00 265¢57 )7.4
llgE PERIOD
PRESENT TO
~130/?0
SURPLUS/ REOUIREO CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY) S VALUE AT PLAHNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
34,170 VALUE VAL~E
7.t)
B.e)
0.2)
1.6)
3.o)
(5.B)
(7.2)
(8.6)
HO.O)
{11.(}
POPULATIOt4 REQUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CD-WIDE I VALUE Al Fq.A~NED AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHCY)
PER~ANEHT $34,170/UNI1 V~UE VALUE
I
1
1
1
1
1
17~,.,65 847,416" 0 546,720 (300,6%)
734,655 O
79~,578 0
895,25~ 341,700
~?O,g30 0
,OZB,76g 0
,086,606 0
,154,44¢ 0
,182,282 0
,230,120 0
,277,%8 0
410,040
546,720
546,720
B89:420
988 420
BBB 42O
B~B 420
98~ 420
e88 420
BBB 420
888,420
888,420
(324,6151
(252,858)
(6,e34)
{H.6721
(10~.510)
(150,34~)
i198,186)
(246,024)
(27),862)
(341,700)
(38~,538{
YEAR 6ROYTH
10/90 - 9/95
YEAR. SUBTOTAL
2MI 5-YR 6R~TN
10 YEAR TOTAL
4~,840 239,190 341,700 341,700 102,510
225,205 1,096,606 ~H,700 ~88,420 (198,186)
~9,8Z2 191,Z52 0 0 (191,~52)
265,057 1,277,758 :!,41,700 888,420 (~89,538)'
,°AKS IU4D RE~REATIO#:R/G~O~AL P~: NCR~
L_~'P-- OF SERVICE STANOARDz :.?41~YlOOO P(~.
POPULATION RES PARK ACRES REB PARK AMES RES ?AK ACRE 5'UR~/
Ca-WIDE REgUIRED ~ANN~ AVAILAB~ [OE'FICI~CY)
l~:~i.O ~4~.7 CBC.4
~UUIRE!)
s C~5T AT
[0,000
*,~7,000
6,037,000
?,20~,00¢
?,)0:,000
I,:60,000
0
2,00¢,000
0
¢
TOTAL
AVAI'..A~.?
VALUE
SURPLUS/
2.B2~,000
~,384,000
6.3B~.000
6,:B~.O00
6,~B4,300
~3B~,O00
~LATigN RE~ ~ARK ACRE~ RE~ ?ARK AC~E~ ::ES ~ARK ACRE SURPLUS/
:~-~i~E R_~UIRE~ ........ AVAIL~B~ ~E:ICIE~Y|
?ER~AN~T ~.3 IN
.... 43E
YEAR HROWl'l{ '
lO/')O - {/95 49,HBO 147 200 200
YEAR SUBTOTAL .l.,,~SH 633 3~6 43H
2NI) ~YR b'tU3WIM (?,TH~} 147 ('.-SA) 0 (~)
1o YEAR TOTAL 24),0'.,7 780 200 6~8 0
PANICS AND RECREATZ~:SHUFFLEBOAKD COURTS
LEVE~. OF SERVICE STANDARD: .070611000 POP.
POPULAT]Ofl COURTS COURTS COURTS SURPLU~I REQUIRED CXP TOTAL SURFLU$!
FISCAL CO-WIDE REDUIP£D PLAIPIED AVAILABLE {DEFICIENCY) $ VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILA~E (DEFICIENCY)
YEAR PERMANE#T 0,00~706 IN LIP ~10,5~ VALUE VAL~
8e-B? 152561 lO,B 11.0 0,2
89-90 1655E8 11.7 20.0 e.~
90-91 175~5 12.q 20.0 7.6
71-92 IB534( 13.1 20.0 6.?
?2-e~ 175125 1~.8 2 ...(, e.2
?3-94 205~09 14.~ 22.0 7.5
?(-75 21526e ~5.2 22.0 6.6
?5-96 225205 15.9 22.0 6.1
?6-97 235143 16.6 22.0 5.4
?7-98 2{50Bi 17.3 22.0 4.7
?H-V? 2~5028 28 22.0 4.0
?~-00 265P57 iR.7 22.0 3.3
113,400
122 850
i30 200
i37 550
152 250
157 600
i~6 950
174 ~00
181 650
lB? 000
0 115,500 2.100
0 21~,000 87,150
0 210,000 7~,800
0 210,000 72,450
21,000 231,0~0 86,100
0 231.000 78.750
0 2~1,0('0 71,400
~ 231.C0(~ 64,050
0 231,000 56,700
0 2~l,OOC 4~,250
0 2~1.000 42,000
0 232.000 :4.650
ll~E PERIOD
PRESENT TC
9,~0,t0
POPULATIOtl REQUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-{IDE $ VALUE AT PLAI~ED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
FER~MENi SlO.500/UMIl VALUE VALUE
130,200 0 210,000 79~(~
YEAR 6RONTH
IO/90 - 9/95 47,B40 36,750 21,0(}0 21,000 (15,750)
YEAR ~BTOTAL 225,205 166,950 21,00~ 231,000 64,050
2{{~ 5-YR BROWT~ 39852 2~4045 0 0 -64050
lO YEAR TOTAC 265,057 196,35~ 21,000 231,000 O
Og-Aul-90
PARKS AND RECJ~EATIOM:FQQT)ALLISOCCER FIELDS
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: .055511000 POP.
POPULATION FIS FIELDS F/S FIELDS FIS S~PtUS/ REOUXRED CZP TOTAL SU£PLUSI
FZSCAL CO-I(IDE ~EOU]RED PLANNED FIELDS (DEFICIENCY) $ VALUE AT PLANKED A.AILA])LE (I)EFICIENCY)
YEA~ PERI, ANENT e.oooe35: IN CIP AVAZLABLE ;:.'.,500 VALUE ' VALL;E
~-e? 152561 5.4 4.0 (1o4) 1,217,700 0 902,00?
89-?0 l&13eB ).e ~.0 (O.B) 1,307,900 0 1,127,5¢0 (IBO,¢O0)
90-gl 175)65 6.2 2 7.0 O.B 1.3ge,IO0 451,000 1,578,50~ IB~,400
91-92 185544 6.5 1 B.O I.) 1,46~,,50 225,500 i,B('4,000
~-9: I?5325 6.9 8.0 1.1 1,5~5,~50 0 I,BO(,OOO 24~.050
95-94 205509 7.2 B.O ~.E 1,62i,600 O 1,B04,000 190,40('
q4-95 21526e 7.6 B.O O.~ 1,713,B00 0 1,E04,000 90.200
?~-96 225205 7.9 8.0 0.1 1,781,450 0 1,B04,00(~ .... 50
96-97 235143 e.3 8.0 (0.5) 1,B71,650 0 1,B04,OO0 (67,650)
~l-g~ 2450B4 ~.7 B.O (0.?) 1,t61,850 0 1,B04,000
9e-9~ 25502B q e.O (1.05 2,02%50(' (, 1,B04,000 (~ZS,500J
~-00 265057 g.4 e.o (1.45 ~,..%7(,(, 0 1,B04.000
POPULATION ~EO~IRED LIP IDTAL SURPLUS/
CO-WI~E $ VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE (OEFICIENCY)
TI~E PERIO~ PERPJNENl $2~5,500/UNI1 VALUE VALUE
PRESENT TO
9~30/~0 175,365 1,39B,100 451,000 1,57£,500 IB0,400
5 YEAR GROWTH
10190 - 9/95 4?,840 383,350 225,500 225,500 (157,B50)
5 YEAR Sb~TOTAL 225,205 1,781,450 676,500 1,804,000 22,550
ZIID 5-Ylt GIU~TH ~?,852 338,250 0 0 (33B,250)
JO YEAR TOTAL 265,057 2,119t704) 676~54Q ~904,000 (315~700)
PARKS MD RECREATIDN:SOFTI{ALL FIELDS
LEVEL Of ,SERVICE STANOA~D: .0706/J000 POP.
POPULATION SOFTBALL FIELD SOFTBALL FIELD SOFTBALL SURPLUS/
FISCAL CO-¥IDE REDUIR~ED P_MN~ FIELDS (DEFICIENCY)
YEAR PERI,ANENT 0.0000706 TN CIP AVAILADLE
88-e? 152561 10.8 13.0 2.2
89-90 16538B 11.7 12.0 O.Z
90-~1 175~5 12.4 12.0 (0.4)
?I-DZ 185344 13.1 12.0 (1.1)
92-V3 175Z35 13.8 12.0 (I.B)
73-V4 205~09 14.5 i2.0
94-95 215268 15.2 12.0
95-96 225205 15.9 i2.0
96-9? 23514Z 16.~ !2.0
9?-98 ~45094 I?.? 1~.0 {5.3]
98-9v 255028 18 12.0 (6.0!
vD-O0 265057 1~.7 12.0
TI~E PERIOD
PRESEkT TO
-- 9/~190
POPULATIOH REDUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
~O-~IDE $ VAL~ AT PLAH,EB AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PE~ANENT S22(,,OOO/UNIT VALUE VALUE
175~&5 2,728,000 0 2,&40,000
5 YEA~ GI~OliTP.
5 I'~M SUI~TOTAL
2~D 5-I'8 6~'OIITH
I0 1T.N} TOTAL
49,840 770,000 0 0 (770,000)
225,205 3,498,000 0 2,640,000 (B58,~00)
~9,852 616,000 0 0 (616,000)
2&5,057 4,I14,000 ~ 2,&40,000 {i,474,000{
REOUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
VALUE AT PLANNED ~VAILABLE (DEFICIE~Y{
220,000 VALUE VALUE
2,37~,000 0 2,8~,000 484,009
2,574,000 0 2,6¢~,00¢
2,~28,000 0 2,~40,000
:.£82,000 0 2,640.000 (:4~,00(')
3,036,000 0 2.640,000 (396.000)
Z,190,O00 0 2,~40.000 (550.¢00)
3,Z44,000 0 2,&40,000 (704,000)
Z,4~8,000 0 2,640,000 (858.000)
Z,&52,000 0 2,649.000
3,806,000 0 2,840,000
Z,%0,O¢O 0 3.640.000 (i,Z30,O00)
4,114~000 0 2,640,0¢0 (1,474~000{
P~KS ~ RE~EATI~:TENNIS COURTS
LEVEL ~ ~I{::E ST/~,I{~D: .0704,11(q)0 POP.
POPIJ..,ATION TENNIS CTS TENNIS CTS
FISC~ CC-VIDE P.E.~IRED ~A~ED
~ P EI~I~A.'(!'NT 0.000070~ IN CZP
~-8~ ,,.,5~1 10.~
!~-~O 1~:388 1 ~.?
le~44
qd-g7 233:41 16.4
{?-OO .L5~57 18.7
TENNIS SUR~USI REOtIIRED CIP TOTAL EURPLUS/
C~_~TS (DEFICIENCY) $ VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE (~E;ICIENCY)
AVAILABLE 30,000 VALUE VALUE
24.0 13.2 324,000 0 720,000 396,000
34.0 22.3 331,000 0 1,020.000
~4.0 21.6 372,000 0 1~20,00~ 648,000
34.0 20.9 ~3,(:00 0 1,02¢~00¢ 627,000
34.0 20.2 414,000 0 1~02C,0C0 606,000
. 34.0 I~.S 4l~.OOC 0 1~020,900 ~85,000
34.0 IB.8 4~6,000 0 1,020,09C 564,000
~4.0 18.1 477,000
34.0 17.4 493.000 0 1,020,000 322,000
34.0 16.7 ~Iq. O00 0 1,020,000 )01,000
34.0 16.0 550,000 0 1,02C,0~0 4BO,O00
34.0 13.3 561,900
POPULATION kEQUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-¥I~ S VALUE AT PLA,NNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
FER~NT i30,O00/UNII VALUE VALUE
173,~63 ~72,0~ - 0 1,020,000 448,0(]0
.% YE~
l{,IqO -
$ t*T_AR SU~TOT~
~ .',-I"I{ 6ROWTH
4q,B40 105,00Q 0 0 (105,0003
223,~) 477,0~q) 0 1,020,000
3~,B32 B4,('O0 0 0 (B4,0~JO)
245,057 ~1,043~ 0 1,020,000 459,000
PA~S AND RECREATIDI(:CHILDRD(S PtAY6ROUN~$
CEVEL ~ SERVICE STAIQ)ARD: .I059/JO(X) POP.
FISCAL
YE~
POPUtATIO# PLAY~ROUNDS PLAY~IU)UNDS PLAYGROUNDS SURPLUS/
EO-¥1DE RE~IR~ P. ANMED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PERflANENT 0.000105~ I# CIP
~5_561 16 .~.0 (1.05
It .... 18 15.0 (3.0)
175365 19 15.0 (4.0)
1853~4 20 15.0 (5.0)
!g5125 21 5 20.0 (1.05
,0¢309 ~- 20.0 (2.0)
2!526B 23 20.0 {3.0)
.... O~ 24 20.0 (4.05
~, ~ 20.0 (~.01
24~094 26 20.0 (6.0)
2fSO2B 27 20.0 (7.0)
.~)L, 2B 20.(: (B.O)
TI~E PERIO~
PRESEUT TO
9/30~9n
POPULATIOU REOUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
CO-UIDE f VALUE Al PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PERKAN£~T $22,~50/UNIT VALUE VALUE
17~,~65 42B,450 0 338,250 (90,200)
5 TEAR GR~%J~IH
10/~0 - 9/9~ 49,840 112,750 112,750 112,750 0
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 22~,205 541,~0 112,7."0 451,000
21~ )-YR HI~OWIR 39,852 ~,200 0 0 (90,200)
10 YEAR 10TAL 265,057 L31,4~ 112,7~ 451,000 (1~0,4005
REOUIRED CIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
VALUE AT PLANI~O AVAILABLE (DEFICIEHCY)
22,550 VAL~ VALI/E
360,B00
40~,900
42B,450
451.000
473 550
496 100
518 6~0
541 2OO
563
~B6
611
33B
338
33B
338
451.
45!
451
451.
451
250 (22,))05
250
250 (?0,200)
250 (112,7~05
000 (22,550)
000
000 (~0,200)
000 (112,7505
000 (13~,3005
000 (157,8505
000 (~BO,400)
m
PN~S AN) P, ECf~ATIOflzTRAC~ AIO FInD
~ ~ SERVICE STANDAi~z .0~5~!100~ POP.
P0;~ATI011 TPJ~IFIELD TRACI~IEI.{
FISCAl. C~IH ~I~
~ p~ 5.~0E~6 IN CIP
~1 17~65 1
92-~ 195125 1.2
93-~4 20~{ 1.2
94-95 215268
~5-96 225~5
96-~7 2~514~ 1.4
97-98
66-~ 25~ i.5
99~0 2~5057
TRACI( AI~
FIELD
AVAILABLE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
SUIU~USI
(DEFICIENCY)
10.9)
(1.0)
(1.0)
il.l)
(1.2)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.4)
(0.4)
(0.5)
(0.6)
TIKE PERIOD
PRESENT TO
~/30190
PDPUCAHDN REDUIREA ClP
C0-¥I~ $ VALUE Al PLANKED
PERE~UiEIIT It?I,5201UNIT VALUE
i75,~5 19t,520 O
TOTAL
AVAILABLE
VALUE
SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY{
0 (t91,5206
REDUIRED
VALUE AT
191,520
172,]68
191 520
191 520
210672
229.824
229 824
240 976
248976
268 128
268 128
287.280
306 432
CIP TOTAL
PLANNED AVAILA~E
VALUE VALUE
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
191,520 191,520
0 191,520
0 191,520
0 191,520
0 191,520
0 191,520
0 191,520
SURPLUS/
(DEFICIENCY)
i172 ~68)
(191 520)
(191 520)
(2i0 672)
(229 824)
(38 304)
(57 456)
(57.456)
(76,608)
(76,608)
(95,760)
(114,912)
I
0
I
5 YE~ GIUXrTH
10I~0 - 9/95 49,040 57,456 191,520 191,520 134,064
5 YEA{t SUITOTAL 225,205 248,976 19i,529 191,520 (57,4566
~ ~ ~ 39,8~ 57,4~ 0 0 (57,4~)
10 ~ T~ 265,0~ ~,4~ 191,~ 191,~ (114,9~)
PARKS AN~) RECREATION:BASKETIALL/VOLLE11ALL COI.I~TS
LEVEL OF SEIWZCE STPJ(DARO: .17&511000 PDP
POPLIL.ATION BIV COURTS BIV COURTS IIV COURTS SURPLUS/
CO-VIDE REOUIRED PLANNED (DEFICIENCY)
PER?I/aEHT 0.~01765 IN LIP AVA!LABLE
FISCAL
YEAR
8B-89 152561 26.9 1~.0 (13.9}
89-90 165~8B 29.2 15.0 (16.2)
90-?I 17~3~5 ~I 1~.0 (1B.O]
???2 I~4 ~2.7 t~.O (19.7)
92-93 19~2~ 34.5 I~ 29.0 (5.5)
94-~ ~15~ ~8 29.0 (9.0)
95-96 :2520~ ~9.7 2%0 (10.7)
9?97 ~5143 41.5 29.0 (i2.5)
77-9B 2(50~¢ 4~.~ 29.0 ~14.~)
~B-99 2~502B 45 29.~ (1~.0)
9e-OC, 2&5¢57 4S.B 29.0 (17.8)
TI~E PERIO~
PRESEr~T TO
YEAR GRQVTH
10/90 - 9/95
YEAR SUBTOTAL
2ND 5-YR
10 YEAR TOTAL
PO~LRTIOq REQUIRED LIP TOTAL SURPLUS/
£O-~IDE s VALUE AT PLAN~ED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)
PE~A~Ef~T Sl7,5OO/UNIT VAL~ VALUE
17~ ~&5 542,500 0 ~n? .....
4~,840 1~2~25~ 2eo~ooo 280,000 1Z7~750
2,.,,&8 £94,750 2B~O00 547~500 (187~250)
4~,7B9 124,254 0 0 (124,250)
26~,057 819~000 .'~0,000 547~5~1 (~11,540)
REI~.IIRED LIP TOTAL
$ VALUE AT PLANNED AVAILABLE
17,500 VALUE VALUE
470,750
5!1,000
542 500
572 250
603
5?4
726
757
787
0
0
0
0
750 280,0o(?
500 0
000 0
750 0
250 0
750 0
500 0
000 0
227 500
227,500
227 500
227 500
507 500
507 500
507 ~00
507 50O
507 500
507 500
507~500
507,500
SURPLUS/
(DEFICXENCY)
(;.(3~ 500)
(~.!5 000)
(?.44
(% 250)
(12~ 00(:)
(157 500)
(187 250)
~250 25O)
(280~000)
(~.I, 50(:)
FACILITY 19EB*.B9 1989-9(~ 19q0-9i 19~1-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-9~
~Vr[ lH'/[ll] O~Y IIr,'EIITDF:Y IIJV[IIIORY 91V[~HORY I~IVEI~TORY IlIVEHTL~flY IIIVENIORY
V~L. UE VALIJ[ VALUE V~LU[ VAL~E VALUE VALUE
POPULAI IO~I(CO-WID[ PER~) 152,561 165~].OB l/5,~&~ 185,M4 F~5,~25 205~0~ 2[5,268
BICYCLE T~RIL5 l,~lO,501 l,~4~r 64 1 ,~52,9~4 ?,2qi,65q 2,SOt,67q 2~779,2t8 2~779~2~8
ClilL ORE~5 Pt fiYGROUNDS 330,2~0 33B,~50 338,?50 ~B,]~ ~51,000 451,~00 ~51,000
CUA~UIIIIY POOLS 0 0
f ITIIESS TRAILS 0 O
FOOtBALL/SOCCER FIEf US 9~2,000 1,127~00 1,57B,500
GY~HASIU~S (~ULII'PURPOSEI n O
OLYUPIC F'OOLS 0 0 0 ~,~rj~j~ JO 2,~00~000 2~00~000 2~300~000
PICIIIC P~V[LIOU5 2B J)Ou 28,090
RACOUETBALL COU~T5 ~tO~O~O M6~720 ~6,720 BSB~120 88B~20 EBB~120
IRACK ~ FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 191~520 191,520
T11,449~0~S ~12,179t~08 $1B~720,$78 122,~6LM2 124,12~,226 $26~02B~01~ $26~028~01q
PER CAPITA VALUE 17~ ~7~ 4U)7 SI21 $124 $127
40 , .179
- 82 -
PARKS ANO RECREATION:LOSS = t122.00 IIIVEIt1ORY VALUEICAP116
ACTUAL VALUE REQUIRED ill THE CIP
~ASED 0)1 lt~D]VIDUAL FACILITY STANDARDS
FACILITY i98B-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-g) 1991-9~ Ig9(-~)
IYPE [IIVENIOflY It{VEIITORY lt~VEIITD~Y [NVEI(IDRY ]tlVENTORY INVEHTORY ]HVENTORY
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
POPULATiOII(CO-¥IOE PERM) 152,S61 165,308 175,362 185,3(~ 195,125 205,309 215,2[B
A~ITI~A1ERS $180,000 $?dO,O00 $2l%000 S720,000 S230,000 S240,000
JRSEJALL FIELOS 2,268,1}0,) 2,115,O~n 2,604,000 2,110,000 2,B~B,~O0 3,024,000
CHILDRE~ PLAYGRDUI{bS 36b,80~ (05,900 428,450 451,000 47),550 4%~100
CO{~IIY CEN1ERS 3,4%~0b0 3,712,000 3,9bB,O00 4~l&O,O00 4,$t&,QO0 (~608,000
CO~MUNiI! POOLS ~(O,OO0 600,000 600,000 660,000 720,Q00 720,000
FOOTIALLISQCEER FIELbS 1,217,700 1,)07,I00 i,198,1.0 1,q65,750 1,555,150 1,62),600
JOGGING TRAILS 142,5612 153,l~0 163,680 171,600 t82,160 I%,QBO
BUtII'PURPOSE CENTERS 1,170,000 1,300,000 1,300,OUO
OLY~IC POOLS 2,070,d00 2,300,000 2,30U,000 2,)30,000 2,760,000 2,760,000
PICNIC PAVILIONS 302,400 327,600 347,200 366,B00 384,400 406,000
SHUFFLEBOAgO COURTS 113,400 122,820 110,200 1)7,~50 I¢4,g00 122,220
SOFTBALL FIELDS 2,17&,000 2,214,000 2,728,000 2,882,000 ),016,00~ l~lgO~O00
TRACE & FIEL0 1~2,Z6B 191,530 I9i,520 210,672 239,824 22%824
$250,000
665,000
518,560
4,864 000
780
~B0
i,7I) 800
200 640
1,690000
2,~90 0O0
425 600
1,0~8 768
IH 600
~,~44 000
456 000
248 976
4,10%~74
TOTAL
PER C~ITA VALUE S137 S127 t126 $12& S128 $126 S127
- 83 -
r
f'Afd'5 CAPIIRL FA. IL.TIES
LEVEL I!F [[R','IC[ STAtlDRRC~ 1122,U0 per caoita
[APl T~l
PDFUL~I lOtl F,XCIL Il lES r~CILIIIE~c CAPITAL
:URPLUS
IOEFICIEI;CY)
VALUE
PLR
CAPITA
88-87
89-9~
97..9~
152
165
175
225.
?48
0'.,7
16,&t~,147 IL,ltV,V25
26,2i, 2,Sq6 1,426,0~}0 )),495,025
2B,687,446 0 ~3,4q5,025
29,9',"),2<B ~ 33~495,02'~
~1,113,416 0 3),49~dC5
lqo850,505}
7,021,327
'7,232,32?
6,020j015
3,5q4,777
$75
$q4 ·
$15&
{156
$14q
{IZ7
$t31
{126
IlHE PERIOD
FbF'ULAII(,M
[CO-WIDE PER~)
rACILIIIES FACILITI£~
NEOUIRED PL~HNED IA£ILIIIES
AT $122 ltl CIE AVAILABLE
SURPLUS/
i~EFICIENCY)
t0190-91~5
5 ~[AR 9{IblO1AI
2qP 5-Yk GRO~TI{
lU YEAR ltllaL
1&5,~89 ?0,177,336 t,527,0('0 12,974,025
I
4q,ouO 6,')B5,~0 [8,~92,()f)~1 33,475,('25
215,2LB
6,074,25e ~ 3T,4qS,025
76
4
~oo~ '40Pu,~. ~_81
- 84 -
SUMMARY OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INVENTORY
TYPE OF FACILITY
Amphitheater
Baseball Fields
Basketball/Volleyball
Courts
Bicycle Trails (Miles) 57.6
Children's' Playgrounds 15
Community Centers 2
Community Park (Acres) 223
Community Pool 0
Fitness Station Trails 0
Football/Soccer Fields 5
Multi-purpose Facility 0
Jogging Trails (Miles) 2.1
Olympic Pool 0
Picnic Pavilions 1
Racquetball Courts 16
Regional Park (Acres) 439.4
Shuffleboard Courts 20
Softball Fields 12
Tennis Courts 34
Track and Field 0
Boat Ramps 7
COLLIER
COUNTY OTHER
9~30~90 .G. OVERN~E,NT pRIVATE
1 1 0
4 5 1.5
17 44 3
25.3 10
24 9
3 30
0 0
1 56
2 16
9 0
10 0
1 1.5
0 0
2 13
8 11
6842 0
13 79
28 1.5
51 188
8 0
16 34
- 85 -
TOTAL
2
10.5
64
92.9
48
35
223
57
18
14
10
4.6
0
16
35
7281.4
112
41.5
273
8
57
sum, u~¥ o~ pm~xs ~ ~.¢~s~T~o~ ~.OrO~aL PA~XS ~NW. NTO~tX
~/3o/~o
~OLLIER,~OUNT~
Tigertail
Clam Pass
South Collier Blvd.
Vanderbilt
North Gulfshore
Barefoot Beach Preserve
Lely Barefoot
State Beach at Barefoot
951 BR
Caxambas
Bayview
Pt. Marco Beach Access
Conklin Point
Lake Trafford
Total
31.6
35.0
1.0
5.0
.5
186.0
5.0
156.0
.5
4.2
4.2
1.0
6.2
3.2
439.4
- 86 -
REVENUE FORECASTS
- 87 -
3. REVENUE FORECASTS
There are 21 sources of revenue that Collier County will use to pay
for its capital improvements for public facilities. Twenty-two of
the revenue sources are "restricted" in that they can be used only
for specific types of public facilities. The twenty-third and
twenty-fourth sources of revenue, Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue
Fund) and 7th Cent Sales Tax can be used for any type of public
facility.
The revenue sources are presented in the same sequence as the
facility requirements calculations in order to relate the
"restricted" revenues to the appropriate costs.
In the forecasts listed below, each source of revenue is listed
with the amount that is estimated to be received by the County from
October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1995. As a general rule,
revenue forecasts are based on recent actual collections,
statistical trend analysis and a 6% growth factor to conform to the
projected population increase that appears in the requirements
analysis (see Chapter 2). There is no inflation factor in the
revenue forecasts, just as there was no cost inflator in the
requirements analysis.
ROAD REVENUES
1. Constitutional Gas Tax $ 2,366,000
2. County Gas Tax 5,661,000
3. Local Option Gas Tax 16,895,000
4. Road Impact Fees 31,834,000
5. Developer Contribution 1,000,000
6. FDOT Road Funds 4,865,000
NATERAND SEWER REVENUES
7. System Development Fees
8OLID WASTE REVENUES
8. Landfill User Fees
LIBRARY REVENUES
9. Trust Fund and Donations
10. Library Impact Fees
11. Carry Forward
GOVERNMENT BUILDING REVENUES
12. State Funds for Agriculture Building
13 Carry Forward
· 185
- 88 -
57,019,000
10,205,000
197,000
6,581,000
2,517,000
99,000
3,812,000
DRAINAaB REVENUES 14. Stormwater Utility Bonds
15. Carry Forward
18,638,000
200,000
PARKS AND RECREATION REVENUEB 16. Florida Boating Improvement Program
17. Parks Impact Fees
18. Developer Contribution (Land)
19. Carry Forward
1,131,000
14,563,000
768,000
6,065,000
UNRESTRICTED REVENUE
20. Ad Valorem Taxes: 1 Mill Capital
Revenue Fund
21. 7th Cent Sales Tax **
TOTAL
6,850,000
96.674.000'
$287,940,000
Notes~
* Subject to BCC adoption
** The Board of County Commissioners has adopted the following
alternative revenue policies should the 7th Cent Sales Tax not
pass at referendum in November, 1990:
Proiect Type Revenue Source Amount
1. County & State Roads Co-wide Road Improvement $ 85,874,000
Deficit Assessment District
2. Jail Housing G.O.B. Referendum 8,800,000
3. Regional Park Land G.O.B. Referendum 2.000.QQQ
Total $ 96,674,000
- 89 -
- 90 -
One of the most important requirements of the Capital Improvement
Element of the Comprehensive Plan is that it must be financially
feasible. In accordance with Chapter 9J-5.016, F.A.C., the County
must be able to afford the standards of service that it adopts.
The preliminary test of the financial feasibility of the County's
standards of service is presented below. It compares the estimated
cost of required public facilities (from Chapter 2) to the revenue
forecasts from Chapter 3.
The relative priority of need among facility types is based on two
variables. First of all those facilities which are linked to the
issuance of development orders (e.g. roads, water, sewer, drainage,
solid waste and parks) as a group will have a higher priority than
other facility types (Category B) in order to assure that
concurrency requirements are met. The second variable is the type
of revenue used to support each facility type. There are revenue
restrictions among the above mentioned six facility types which
prevent the County from using surplus funds from one facility type
to fund another facility type. Water, sewer and solid waste
facilities are each financed through enterprise funds. This means
that like a private business, the costs of providing goods and
services are financed primarily by user fees. Any surplus revenues
cannot be utilized to finance other types of facilities. Road
projects are funded with gas tax and impact fee revenues. Again,
these revenues are levied/charged for a special purpose and cannot
be used to fund revenue deficits relating to other facility types.
Drainage projects are also funded with special revenue funds levied
for a special/specific purpose.
Because of the restrictiveness of revenues by facility type
prioritization of need among them will not help in eliminating
deficiencies caused by a lack of revenue or capacity since surplus
revenues for one facility type cannot be used to fund deficiencies
in other facility types.
Appendix B of the Capital Improvement Element includes a Capital
Improvement Schedule of Projects (Table 2). Within each facility
type all projects are identified as either providing required
capacity for existing deficiencies (as of 09-30-90) for future
growth or both. Within each facility type the schedule of projects
prioritizes projects in order to first eliminate existing
deficiencies.
In the following table of costs and revenues each restricted
revenue source is first compared to the cost of the facilities to
which the revenue is restricted. If the revenue is greater than
the cost, the "surplus" of revenue is shown as a reserve for future
projects or expansion of capacity for future growth. If, however,
the restricted revenue is less than the cost, the "deficit" for
188
that type of public facility will be added to the deficits from
other types of public facilities in order to determine the
county-wide deficit of costs after crediting all restricted
revenues. The county-wide deficit is then compared to unrestricted
revenue, and a final surplus or deficit is calculated.
If the bottom line is a surplus (or zero), the plan is financially
feasible; if the bottom line is a deficit, the plan is not
financially feasible and will need to be adjusted by:
2.
3.
4.
reducing the levels of service;
increasing revenues;
reducing the cost and quality of facilities; or
any combination of the first three.
In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public
facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains
the 5-year amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a
calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All
deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit
is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County
to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for
levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. Alternative revenues
to replace revenues requiring voter approval (7th Cent Sales Tax)
are listed under notes.
COUNTY ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS
LESS Available Revenues:
Constitutional Gas Tax $ 2,366,000
County Gas Tax 5,661,000
Local Option Gas Tax 16,895,000
Road Impact Fees 31,834,000
$ 106,895,000
56.756.0QQ
STATE ROADS NETWORK
LESS Available Revenues:
FDOT 5-year Work Plan
Developer Contributions
DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS
LESS Available Revenues:
Stormwater Utility Bonds*
Carry Forward
4,865,000
1,000,000
18,638,000
200,000
Deficit
Deficit
( 50,139,000)
41,600,000
5.865.0~9
( 35,735,000)
18,838,000
Balance
- 0 -
Subject to BCC adoption
Deficit
'40 189
- 92 -
( 3,009,000)
WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS
LESS System Development Fees
SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL
LESS Solid Waste User Fees
PARK~ & RECREATION
LESS Available Revenues:
Park Impact Fees
Boating Improvement
Program
Developer Contribution
(Land)
Carry Forward
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
JAIL HOUSING
LIBRARY
Buildings
Collection
Reserve for Impact Fee
Eligible Projects
Total Library Costs
LESS Available Revenues:
Library Impact Fee
Trust Fund
Carry Forward
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
LESS Available Revenues:
State Funds for
Agriculture Building
Carry Forward
FIRE DISTRICT
Isle of Capri
Ochopee
14,563,000
1,131,000
768,000
6,065,000
6,581,000
197,000
2,517,000
99,000
3,812,000
Balance
Balance
Deficit
Deficit $(
Deficit (
Deficit
Balance.
Subtotal Deficit of Restricted Revenue vs. costs
57,019,000
-- 0 --
10,205,000
-- 0 --
24,993,000
( 2,466,000)
978,000)
8,800,000)
5,841,000
1,383,000
4.468.000
11,692,000
9.295.000
( 2,397,000)
6,920,000
3.911.00Q
0
0
(103,524,000)
- 93 -
Unrestricted Revenues:
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill
Capital Revenue Fund)
7th Cent Sales Tax (Bonds
& Cash Flow)
6,850,000
96,674,000.*
Balance
The Board of County Commissioners has adopted the following
alternative revenue policies should the 7th Cent Sales Tax not
pass at referendum in November, 1990:
2e
Pro4ect TYPe
County & State Roads
Deficit
Jail Housing
Regional Park Land
~eveDue Sourc~
Co-wide Road
Improvement
Assessment District
G.O.B. Referendum
G.O.B. Referendum
Total
Amount
$ 85,874,000
8,800,000
$ 96,674,000
191
- 94 -
COLLIER COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONB
- 95 -
PERMANENT POPULATION
PLAN AREA NAME - No. OCTOBER 1. 1990
SEPTEMBER 30. 1995
North Naples 1 25,210
Central Naples 2 15,163
Golden Gate 3 20,638
East Naples 4 20,409
South Naples 5 13,274
Marco Island 6 11,791
Royal Faka-Palm 7 7,412
Creek
Rural Estates 8 5,943
Urban Estates 9 4,844
Corkscrew 10 3,871
Immokalee 11 14,654
Big Cypress 12 336
City of Naples 13 21,308
Everglades City 14 534
County Total 165,388
(Permanent)
Peak Seasonal Totals 227,130
Weighted
Average* Totals 185,763
34,343
19,295
30,196
26,263
17,248
15,803
10,565
9,256
7,281
4,942
16,770
348
22,395
~61
215,268
295,773
241,835
Based on 8 months permanent population and 4 months peak
seasonal
Source: Collier County Planning Department, March 20, 1990.
- 96 -
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMUNITIEB
- 97 -
S-R. B4
~**~4.F Cw? '~CCCO
1'
ROYAL FAK AP AI..~
"-...~,
0 10ML
PLANNING'COMMUNITIES
!COI. UER COUNTY, FLORIDA
tJNm~'r~
1. ~ NAPI.E~ I~ N~
BIG CYPRF~
APPENDIX B
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1990/91 - 1994/95
COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Second Update
Spring, 1990
Table
2
LIST OF TABLES
Title
Collier County Capital Improvements Costs
Collier County Capital Improvement
Schedule of Projects
Net Operating Cost Impact
TABLE 1
co~ cou~?~ CA~?AL ~M~ROVm~E~S
FY 90/92 - 94/95
TYPE OF FACILITY
COUNTY ROADS
STATE ROADS
DRAINAGE
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
JAIL HOUSING
LIBRARY (BUILDINGS)
LIBRARY (COLLECTION)
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
PARKS & RECREATION
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
SEWER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL
TOTAL
40 198'
PROJECTS COSTS
$ 106,895,000
41,600,000
18,838,000
978,000
8,800,000
10,309,000
1,383,000
6,920,000
24,993,000
27,016,000
30,003,000
10.205.~00
$ 287,940,000
ROAD PROJECTSt COILIEP. CO~T~ S-TEAR CAPITAL IMPROV'KMEJF~S KL,.KMKJ~' $(000)
5
Project Pr~or 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 l~utur~ Tote!
374
I Illth Avenue North (DEFERRED) (C) 352
US 41 - Vanderbllt Drive
2 Airport Pulling Road (CR-31) (COMPLETED) (B) 2112
Radio Road - Golden Gate
Parkway:
3 Airport-Pulling Road (CR-31) '- 55 2486 1980
US 41 - Golden Gate Parkway
4 Davis B~ulevard (SR-84) (B) 2097 110
Santa Barbara Boulevard -
County Barn Road
Golden Gate Parkway (CR-886) (B) 412 4879 1200
CR-851 - CR-31
Immokalee Road (CR-846) (B) 1454 5500
US-41 - 1-75
Immokalee Road (CR-846) (C) 1045
1-75 - CR-951
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951) (C) 750 5390
US 41 - Rattlesnake Hammock
Road:
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951) (C) 264 1100
SR-84 - Rattlesnake Hammock
Road:
12 Isles of Capri Road ($R-951) (B) 2726 165
US 41 - Marco Bridge "
13 Isles of Capri Road (CR-951) (COKPLETED) (C) 5885
23rd Ave. S.W. - Golden Gate
Blvd. -'
14 Pine R/dge Road (CR-~96) (B) 385 3630 1100
US 41 - CR-31
15 Radio Road (C) 517 5973
CR-31 - Santa Barbara Blvd.
(A) - Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) - Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) u Future Growth
5203
4978
2970 3322
1441
9OO0
10450
2112
5962
2207
15491
6954
6397
6140
6567
2891
15565
6490
,I
~RY A
ROAD PROJECTS~ COLLI'ER COUN'Z~ ~-I~__.AR CAPITAL lrM~ROV'~4ENTS ~
Project PriOr 90-91
~ 21
22
~' 23
~ 2¢
25
16 Radio Road
Santa Barbara Boulevard -
SR-84
17 Rattlesnake Eammock Road
US 41 - Polly Avenue
19 Goodlette Frank Road (CR-851)
Carica Road - CR-846
20 Gulf Shore Drive
Vanderbilt Beach Road
lllth Ave.
Livingston Road (North)
CR-846 - Imperial ST+EW Conn.
Santa Barbara Blvd./Logan
Green Canal - PAne Ridge
Road
Vanderbilt Beach Road
US 41 - CR-31
Vanderbilt Beach Road
Oaks - CR-951
Vanderbilt Drive (CR-901)
111th - Bonita Beach Road
26 Westclock Road
Carson Road - $R-29
27 Major Reconstruction
28 Traffic Signal&
31 Bonita Beach Road
Vanderbilt Drive to County-
line
32 Santa Barbara Boulevard
Davis Blvd to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road
(DELETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPI~TED)
(DEFERKED)
(C) 270
(C) 545 1650
(C) 495 1980
(c)
(C) 1756
(C) 17
(C) 1051
(C) 2461
(c)
(c) 55
(c)
(c)
2463
1408
165
688
5945
550
952
85O
5O6
55O
968
$(ooo)
91-92
55O
92-93 93-94 94-95
2200
~tu~
3850
2310
2560
1650
572O
497 307 630 628
764 490 605 630
880 2750
3412
3000
3575
Total
3020
6045
2475
1756
5575
6996
2461
7920
1007
8787
7403
4345
4543
(A) " Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) - Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) = Future Growth
CAT~OORY A
ROAD PRO~ECTS ~
33 County Barn Road
Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road
Advanced ROW ~=quisition
35 Carson Road
Lake Trafford Road to
Immokalee Drive
New North-South Road
CR-858 to CR-846
Isles of Capri Road (CR-951)
Golden Gate Blvd. to CR-846
Pedestrian Overpass on SR-29
at Farmworkers Village
Airport-Pulling Road
Golden Gate Parkway to Pine
Ridge Road
~oodlette-Frank Road
Golden Gate Parkway to
Solana Road
41 Pine Ridge Road
Airport Road to 1-75
42 Vanderbilt Beach Road
US 41 to Gul~shore Drive
(c)
Prior 90-91
200
(C) 33 512
( COMPLETED )
(C) 253
(C) i76
110
(c)
550
(c)
(c)
(c)
$(ooo)
91-92 92-93 93-9& 94-9'5 Futuz~ . Total
3190
363 682 ..
200 200 200 200 1300
528 4290
330 2431
308
440
3751
550 2200
COUNTY ROADS SUBTOTAL
3080
27645 45756 19590 12063 13909 15577 39853
4235
2300
545
253
3927
66O
4818
2761
3058
,3520
174393
(A) -' Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) - Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) - Future Growth
CATEGORY A
~ 46
~ 47
ROAD PROJECTS
Pro~ ect
43 Tamlami Trail East (US 41)
Davis Boulevard to Airport
Road
44 Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Grade separation at Pine
Ridge Road
45 Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Immokalee Road to Laurel Oak
Drive
Tamiami Trail East (US 41)
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road to
Barefoot WHS. Road
Tamiami Trail East (US 41)
Airport Road to Rattlesnake-
Hammock Road
Davis Boulevard (SR-84)
Airport Road to Kings Lake
Boulevard
David Boulevard (SR-84)
Kings Lake Boulevard to
County Barn Road
50 Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Immokalee Road to Wiggins Pass
51 SR 951
New York Drive to Marco Bridge
COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL ~MP~OVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000)
Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94
(C) 470 6700 3500
(DESiReD) (C)
(Dm_~ETE)* (B)
(DELETE)* ~(C)
94-95 Future Total
10670
10000 10000
(C) 1515 5609 7124
(C) 1196 4428 5624
4100
678 2509 3187
595 500 2200 3295
7600 11700
STATE ROADS SUBTOTAL
0 4100 4454 17309 15737 0 10000 51600
* Note=
TOTALS 27645 49856 24044 29372 29646 15577 49853 225993
To be funded in the revised FDOT 5-Year Work program with revenue from the additional 4 cent gas tax
enacted by the 1990 Legislature
(a)
(a)
(c)
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
CATEGORY
DRAXNAGE PROJECTSz COT-T-XER CO~ 5oYEAR C3LPXTAL X~ KLKMB3r~ $(0OO)
Project Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93
93-9&
200 Master Plan, Basin Plans
201 District No. 6
202 Cocohatchee River Canal
203 Gordon River Extension
204 Other Drainage Projects
205 Land and Environmental
291 District No. 6 (Lely)
292 Oordon River Extension
293 Cocohatchee River System
294 Main Golden Gate System
295 Henderson Creek Basin
296 Faka-Union Basin
297 Southern Coastal Basin
298 Barren River Basin
( D ~'nr.~'ED )
(DELETED)
(DELETED)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
155 224 2414 3260 1925
300 1860
82 260
315 320
160
105
160
53
237 1099 2894 3365 3998
94-95
1293
5956
180
7482
Futuz~
921
921
Total
9271
9037
342
635
160
265
233
19996
(A) -
(n) =
(c)
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
CATEGORY A
EMS AND 3'ALL PROJECTSI COLLIER COUNTY 5-TKAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS KLKMEMT $(000)
Project Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Future To~l
301 LelF/East Tamiami EMS (COMPLETED) (A) 326
Station
302 Golden Gate Parkway EMS (C)
303 System Status Float Unit (C)
304 EMS Station and Vehicle (C)
326
326
326
326
326
326
326
EMS Total 326 326
326
326
1304
400 Jail Expansion
(n)
8800
8800
(A) m ExLstLng DefLcLency (09/30/90)
(B) m ExLoting Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) ~ Future Growth
CATEGORY A
GOVERNMElqrT BUILDINGS PROJKCTSt COLLTER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPYTAL IMPRO~$ ELEMENT $(000)
Project Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95
500 Headquarters Addition
501 East Naples Branch
502 Collier North Branch
503 Marco Island Branch
504 Library HQ Renovation
505 Immokalee Branch
506 Golden Gate Branch
507 Vineyards Branch L£brary
Library Building Total
(B)
(CO~FLET~D) (A)
(C)
(C)
(DELETe) (C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
253 2845 505
279 35
25 354
25
25 254 35
10 331 55
68
995
253 2870 844 974 158 995
Total
3603
314
379
314
421
1063
6094
550 Library Collection
(C) 384 391 248 248 248 248
1767
(A) ~
(B) -
(C) -
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
~IY &
~ BUZLDXNGS PP. O3'~CTSZ C~LLI~t C~)UNTY 5-~..JUt CAPXT~T., ZMPRO~ ~ $(000)
Project Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-9& 94-95
600 New Courthouse
601 New Eealth Building
603 Building B Renovation
604 Building W Expansion
605 New Agriculture Center
607 Development Services
608 Building C-2 Addition
Non-CIE Project
(C) 8660 3720
(COm='LET~D) (c)
(D~.P~I~)* (C)
(C) 2100
(C) 60 1100
(COm'LETED) (C)
(COMPLETED) (C)
TOTAL 8660 4820 2100
Future
0
Total
12380
2100
1160
15580
(A)
(B)
(c) =
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing D~ficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
CATEGORY A
PA]tKS PJt~J'ECTSt COLLIER COUNT~ S-TEAR CJLPITAL 3'MP~ ELEMENT $(000)
Proj oct
700 Amphitheater
701 Bicycle Trails
702 Community Park $6
703 Community Parks - Phase II
704 Community Pool
705 Multi-Purpose Facility
706 Jogging Trails
707 Regional Park Land
708 Olympic Pool
709 Track and Field
710 Boat Ramps
711 Community Park $7
712 Community Park $8
TOTALS
Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-9S Future To~al
(A) 100 100
(B) 289 289 260 277 1115
(C) 992 1474 2466
(B) 1870 2018 2821 564 1118 8391
(B) 11 589 600
(B) 1300 1300
(B) 25 25 25 75
(B) 170 2000 2170
(A) 2300 2300
(C) 191 191
(B) 67 937 386 386 387 2163
(C) " 100 2194 1471 3765
(c) ~oo ~;~4 ~47~
1937 4406 10806 4018 3569 2194 1471 28401
(A)
(B)
(C) -,
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
,I
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJECTS
Project
809
810
all
812
813
~ai6
818
CD820
801 Rattlesnake Hammock Road
802 County Barn Road
803 Davis Boulevard 16"
804 Davis Boulevard 20'
805 91st Avenue 12' Intercon.
806 7th Street 12' Intercon.
808 Audubon County Club
Carica Road pumping
Caries Road Tank
Land for North Reg.
Treatment
Coral Reef Wellfield Study
Radio Road
PAne Ridge Road
Goodlette Road Extension
Seagate Drive 12"
Airport Road 16#
lmmokalee Road
Immokalee Road 16~
Vanderbilt Drive
823 CR-95!
CR-952 12"
825 Rattlesnake-Hammock Road
826 6th Street 12#
827 Gulfshore & Vanderb£1t
828 Coral Reef Wellfield Phase · (DELETE)
829 North County Reg. Treatment
Plant
830 ·mmokalee Road 36~ (DELETE)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COHPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
(COMPLETED)
Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-9S Futux'~ Total
(B) 448
(a)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(B) 2040
(C) 340
(c)
(B)
(B)
(B)
(B)
(B)
(C)
(B)
(C)
(C)
102
451
739
82
203
881
204
590
245
649
9085
268
1126
4415
(c)
448
2040
340
102
451
739
82
203
881
204
858
245
1775
13500
(a) = Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) = Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) & Future Growth
CATEGORY A
WATER PROJECTS~ COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAIt CAPT~AL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000)
Pro~ect Pr£or 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Futux'~ Tota~
831 CR-951 3~' (C) 892
832 lmmokalee Road 24' (C) 670
833 lmmokalee Road 20' (C) 370
834 Quail Creek PUD l&" (C) 450
835 Immokalee Road 16" (B) 183
836 Immokalee Road 12' (C) 363
837 Livingston Road Extension 16' (C) 1217
838 1.5 MG Eleveted Tank (B) 125
839 Old US 41 16" (C) 120
840 Pine Ridge Road 16' (B) 70
841 Davis Boulevard 16" (B) 55
~ 842 5 MG Ground Tank (C)
~ 843 12' Hain at Pine Ridge Road (B) 760
844 12" Hain at Pine Ridge Road (B) 380
~846 12" Water Hain at US 41 (B)
0847 12" Water Hain at Immokalee (B) 707
~ Road
~ 848 12# Water Hain at US 41
~849 North County Wellfield - (DEI~ETE) (C)
~ Phase II
'~850 Golden Gate Wellfield (C) 1675
Expansion
851 Raw Booster Station (C) 1620
852 20' Main on Goodlette Road (C) 696
Extension
853 16" Loop Hain on Palm Drive (C) 687
854 20' Hain - US 41 North (C) 600
855 12' Hain on Radio Road (C) 982
1210
375
304
1471
19
205
26
283
892
670
370
45O
183
363
1217
1335
120
445
359
1471
760
380
224
707
309
1675
1620
696
687
6OO
982
(A)
(C) =
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
CATE~3ORT A
WATER PROJECTS
COLLIZ.q COUi'A'A'Y S-YEAR CAPITAL XMPROVEMENTS ELEME~T $(000)
Project
856 16' Main - Livingston Road
Wyndemere
857 16' Main on Santa Barbara
858 36' Main on CR-951
859 N. County Treatment Plant
Expansion
860 Aquifer Storage & Recovery
TOTAL
Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 Future Total
(c) 480
(c) 57 264
(C) 380 2196
(¢)
(c) 500 500 450
800 4000
20994 15413 6270 819 4231 283
0
48O
321
2576
4800
1450
48010
(A) '-
(C)
Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
Future Growth
C~TEGORY A
SKWER PROJECTS
COLL~'[~R COUI~'~ S-Y~R C~LPZTJ~ ZMPRI::~4EX'~ ~ $(000)
Project
901 North County Expansion (B)
902 East and South Naples (B)
Collection System
904 South County Reg. Treatment (B)
Facility
906 Utility Administration (DEFERRED) (C)
Building
907 South County Pump, Mains & (B)
Disposal
908 8# Force Main - Pump Station (C)
15 to Pump Station 20
909 12# Force Main - Pump (C)
Station 19 to Pump Station 20
910 10# Force Main - Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED) (B)
~ Pump Station 11 to Santa
~ Barbara
911 Davis Blvd. Pump Station (B)
No.ll
~912 10" Force Main Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED) (B)
Pump Station 14 to Pump
Station 11
913 Dsvis Blvd. - Pump Station (B)
14
914 20' Force Main CR-951/US 41 (B)
Pump Station 18 to Pump
Station 1
915 Pump Station No. 18 (C)
916 South County Reg. Treatment (C)
Facility Expansion
917 North County Reg. Treatment (C)
Facility Expansion
Prior 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-9& 94-95 Future Total
5695
22286
12508
19749
140 712
220 1177
100 500
100 500
100 502
100 500
1800 8876
500 2607
5695
22286
12508
19749
852
1397
600
6O0
602
600
10676
3107
(A) m Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) ~ Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) = Future Growth
CAT~GOR~ &
SEWER PROJECTS
Project
COLLIER COUNT~ 5-YEAR C~PITA~ INPROV~M~ ~
Prior 90-91
922
923
924
918 20= Force Main -
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road -
CR-951 to Polly Avenue
919 Rattlesnake-Bammock Road -
Pump Station 20
920 Pump Station 16 - CR-951
921 CR-951 - 12" Force Main -
Pump Station 16 to Pump
Station 18
North County Pump Station
Telemetry System
Operations Building
North County Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Pump Station
North County No. 1.10
Pelican Bay Improvement District
47520 L.F. of Force Main and 2
pump stations
926 Immokalee Road Sewer/Effluent System
Force main & effluent line from N.
Plan= to Quail Creek
927 Master Pump Stations 1.03 & 1.07
2 pump stations on Immokalee Road
928 24' Force Main from 1.06 to 1.07
20,000 L.F. of Force Main from
Airport Road to Orange Blossom
Drive
(C) 100
$(ooo)
91-92
5O2
(C) 100 500
(B) lO0 500
(B) 321
(B) 55
(B) 290
490
2720
3950
1336
1440
(B)
(B)
0'9
(n)
92-93
93-94
94-95
Future
Total
602
6OO
600
321
55
290
490
2720
3950
1336
1440
TOTALS
61073 13127 16876
0 91076
(a) = Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) - Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) - Future Growth
CATEGORY
LANDFILL PROJ'ECTSI COLLIER COUNT't' 5-~-~t CAP~'~.~ IiMPROVEMBIN'I~ ELEMENT
~ject
Pre. or 90-91 91-92
1000 Naples Landfill Expansion (C) 446
1001Leachate Treatment Plant
(c)
1002 Naples Landfill (COMPLETED) (C)
Cell $6, Phase II
2752
1003
1004
1005
1006
Naples Landfill
Cell $6, Phase III
Naples Landfill
Closure of Cells
and #4
Naples Landfill
Cell #6 Phase I First
Lift
Naples Landfill
Develop 300 acres future
cells
(c) 1000 1650
(c)
(c)
446
$(ooo)
92-93
50
1800
1280
370
93-9% 94-95
Futur~
446 446 1784
1425
1400
Total
4014
1475
2752
2650
1800
1280
1770
3752 2466 4976 1871 446 446 1784 15741
(A) = Existing Deficiency (09/30/90)
(B) = Existing Deficiency and Future Growth
(C) = Future Growth
~ OPEP. A~ZNG COS'~ ZMPAC~ O1"' 5 ~
Transportation (a)
Water Management (b)
EMS
Jail
Library
~0/91
102,210
Government Buildings 266,800
Parks & Recreation 303,300
Solid Waste -
Utilities _
TOTAL 672,310
ESTIMATED MILLAGE IMPACT 0.0529
~ 92/93 93/94 94/95
172,520 202,880 215,645 240,830
123,500 (c) 123,500 (c) 123,500 (c) 247,000 (c)
- 1,611,264 (d) 1,611,264 (d) 1,611,264 (4)
149,935 152,935 188,301 188,301
294,640 329,440 329,440 329,440
308,300 846,800 1,080,550 1,208,150
1,048,895 3,266,819 3,548,700 3,824,985
0.0765 0.2131 0.2069 0.1994
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
County Road System only. S=ate is responsible for maintenance of State roads improved by the County.
Big Cypress Basin Board takes over the operational costs.
6 to 9 Paramedics per unit.
35 Correctional Officers and 4 LPNs plus supplies and operating exp~.nses.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring, 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO ~9~1-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS
SERVICE
AREAs County-wide X
(x)
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
or Planning District
246.8
(quantity)
or Special Area
(x)
Lane - Mile.
(unit of measurement)
Pr,~ect ~ame
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
lllth Ave (US 41 to Vanderbilt Dr.) DEFER
Airport-Pulling Road (Phase I) COMPLETE
(Radio Road to Golden Gate Parkway)
Airport-Pulling Road (Phase II)
(US 41 to Radio Road)
Davis Blvd. (Santa Barbara Blvd.
to County Barn Road)
Golden Gate Parkway (CR 851 to
to CR 31)
Im~okalee Road (US 41 to 1-75)
CR 846 (I-75 to CR 951)
CR 951 (US 41 to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road)
CR 951 (CR 864 to SR 84)
Isles of Capri Road (SR 951)
(US 41 to Marco Bridge)
CR 951 (23rd Avenue S.W. to COMPLETE
Golden Gate Blvd.)
Pine Ridge Road (US 41 to CR 31)
Radio Road (CR 31 to Santa
Barbara Blvd.)
Radio Road (Santa Barbara Blvd.
to Davis Blvd.)
Rattlesnake Hammock Road (US 41 to
Polly Avenue)
Goodlette-Frank Road (Carica Road
to CR 846)
Gulf Shore Drive (Vanderbilt Beach DELETE
Road to lllth Avenue)
Livingston Road (CR 846 to COMPLETE
Imperial and E-W Route)
Santa Barbara/Logan (CR 896 to
South of Green Canal)
215
This ~
Pro4ect Total
--- 0.0
--- 0.0
3.6 3.6
2.8* 3.6
3.2 6.8
7.0 13.8
6.8 20.6
6.8 27.4
6.0 33.4
0.0** 33.4
--- 33.4
4.0 37.4
6.0 43.4
3.0 46.4
4.0 50.4
5.0 55.4
--- 55.4
--- 55.4
2.0 57.4
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring, 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO %991-95 DEFICIENCY
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ~QAD$
SERVICE
AREA~ County-wide ,~,, or Planning District
(x)
1991-95 DEFICIENCY~ 246.8
(quantity)
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
or Special Area
Lane - Mile
(unit of measurement)
Progect Name
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Vanderbilt Beach Road (US 41 to
ca 31)
Vanderbilt Beach Road (Oaks Blvd.
to CR 951)
Vanderbilt Drive (lllth Avenue
to Bonita Beach Road)
Westclock Rd. (Carson Rd. to SR 29)
Major Road Reconstruction
Major Traffic Signal Installations
Completed
Completed
Bonita Beach Road (Vanderbilt
Drive to County Line)
Santa Barbara Blvd. (Davis Blvd.
to Rattlesnake Hammock Road)
County Barn Road (Davis Blvd. to
Rattlesnake Hammock Road)
Advanced R.O.W. Acquisition
Carson Road (Lake Trafford Road
to Immokalee Drive)
New N-S Road (CR 858 to CR 84)
Isles of Capri Road (CR 951)
(Golden Gate Blvd. to CR 846)
Pedestrian Overpass on SR 29
at Farm Workers Village
Airport-Pulling Road (Golden Gate
Parkway to Pine Ridge Road
including grade separation at
Golden Gate Pkwy)
Goodlette-Frank Road (Golden Gate
Parkway to Solana Road)
Pine Ridge Road (Airport Road to
1-75 including grade separation
of Airport Road)
~00~
COMPLETE
DEFER
COMPLETE
This Cumul~¥9
8.8 66.2
--- 66.2
--- 66.2
2.0 68.2
--- 68.2
--- 68.2
--- 68.2
--- 68.2
1.6 69.8
8.0 77.8
4.0 81.8
--- 81.8
1.2 83.0
--- 83,0
6.0 89.0
--- 89.0
5.2 94.2
3.4 97.6
4.0 101.6
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring, X990)
~ECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCY
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS
SERVICE
AREA:
County-wide .X... or Planning District
(x)
or Special Area
(#) (X)
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
246.8
(quantity)
Lane - ~ile
(unit of measurement)
..'Number
project Name
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Vanderbilt Beach Road (US 41 to
Gulf Shore Drive)
Tamiami Trail East (US 41) (Davis
Blvd. to Airport Road)
Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
(Grade separation at Pine Ridge Rd.)
Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
Immokalee Road to Laurel Oak Drive
Tamiami Trail East (US 41)
(Rattlesnake Hammock Road to
Barefoot Wms. Road)
Tamiami Trail East (US 41)
(Airport Road to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road)
Davis Blvd. (SR 84) (Airport Road
to Kings Lake Blvd.)
Davis Blvd. (SR 84) (Kings Lake
Blvd. to County Barn Road)
Tamiami Trail North (US 41)
(Immokalee Road to Wiggins Pass)
SR 951
New York Drive to Marco Bridge
DEFER
DELETE
DELETE
size of
Pro~ect Total
2.8 104.4
0.0. 104.4
0.0. 104.4
0.0. 104.4
0.0. 104.4
0.0. 104.4
0.0.
0.0.
104.4
104.4
104.4
104.4
* State Roads do not add to County inventory
** Right of Way acquisition does not add to County inventory
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UKMARY FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ CQVNT¥ RQADS
PRO # i
PROJECT I~AME~ lllth AVENUE
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCLTION~
(~)
(Planning District Name)
;, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON Y
DI¥ISION~ TRANSPORTATION Unit of ~ LANE M
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION 1991, Total Defioiency~ ~46.8
" ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS S~e of This Project: / 0
/
~. Pre- /
Year Construction , and construc,tion/ other Total
~;',. 1993-94 / O~
~ 500 2200 270 2970
32 500 2200 302 3322
~. IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
':':" First Year of I~act FACILITY
Cost per Unit
i/" Number of Units 2,0,
: Gross Cost $ (years)
Less User Revenue -
Not Impact
~APITAL IMPROVEME~"~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: C__O,U~TY Ro~Ds PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME* AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD CPHASE I!
DESCRIPTION: ~ADIO ROAD TO GOLDEN GAT~ pARKWAY [6 LANiNG): %,4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION= 2 CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT= TRANSPORTATION
ORaANIZATION= SECONDARy ~O~D$
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency= 246.8
Size of This Project= Q
Year
Prior
'1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
"1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructio~
140 100
80 200 1400
Other T0tal
24 264
168 1848
Future
Total
220 300 1400
192 2112
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 90/91
Cost per Unit $ ~725
~m~er of units ~.8
Oross Cost $ 4830
Less User Revenue - o
Net Impact $ 4830
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTy ROADS
PROJECT NAME: AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD ~PHASE II)
DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO RADIO ROAD ¢6 LANING~; 1.8 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST N~PbES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 3
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
OROANIZATION: SECONDARy ~O~D$
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~ 246,~
Size of This Project: ~,6
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
' 1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUM]4ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~struction Lan4 Constructfo~
50
Other Total
5 55
260 2000
1800
226 2486
180 1980
310 1000
131 1441
Total
620 2000 2800
542 5962
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
1725
3.6
6210
0
6210
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVE~V~ ELEMENT.
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS PROJECT # 4
PROJECT NAMES DAVIS BOULEVARD (SR 84) (80/20 PROJECT)
DESCRIPTION~ SANTA BARBARA TO COUNTY B~RN ROAD (4 LANiNG~: 1.4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 & 5 EAST NAPbES - SQUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
REBPONBIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
,1990-91
Budget Year
'1991-92
'1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construction Other
46 5
10 100 1750 186
LANE MILE
246.~
- ~ -
Total
51
2046
100 10 110
Total
56 200 1750 201
2207
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
~ross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
None - State Road
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8U~y~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATIONI
PROJECT #
GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR-886)
¢R-851 TO CR-31 (6 LANING}; 1.6 MILES INCLUDING GRADE
SEPARATION AT AIRPORT ROAD
2 CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION= TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT= TRANSPORTATION
ORaANIZATION= SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This ProJeot=
LANE MILE
246.8
3.2
Prior
1989-90.
Forecast
1990-91
'BUdget Year
'~1991-92
~,'1992-93
:'1993-94
~':: ~994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMM~J~Y ($ IN THOUS;tNDS}
Pre-
Constructio~ Land Construction
375
835 800 - 2800
1000
8000
37 412
444 4879
200 1200
1000 9000
Total
1210 1800 10800
1681 15491
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 91/92
Cost per Unit $ 1725'
Number of Units
Oross Cost $ 55~0
Loss User Revenue -
Net Impact $ 55~0
~00~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROAD~
PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE ROAD ¢CR-846)
DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO 1-75 [4 LANING); 3.5 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ & 9 NORTH NAPLES - URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATIQN
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measx=ement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defiolency: 246.~
Size of This Project: 7,Q
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
'Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
co~struct~o~
308 82
267 700 97
Land Constru=tion
500 _ 4500 500
390
1064
5500
Total
575 1200 4500 679
6954
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
OrOll Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/9~
1725
7.0
~2075
0
12075
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
?ROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT
PROJECT NAMES CR-846
DESCRIPTIONs 1-75. TO CR-951 ~4 LANING~: 3.4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATIONs ,9 URBAN ~ST~T~S ,
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS TRANSPORTATION
DEP~TM~NT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANISATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
iMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ __~
1991-95 Total Defiolen~y~ 246.8
Size of This ProJeot~
.Prior
· 1989-90
· ' Forecast
:~ '"- 1990-91
~ ~%.Budget Year
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Constr~ction
440
OthgF Total
510 95 1045
340 34 374
4525 453 4978
Total 440 850 4525 582 6397
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
Pirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
95/96
1725 ,,.
6,~
1~73Q
o
, ~1730
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ COUNTY ROAD~ PROJECT # 10
PROJECT NAME~ C~-95%
DESCRIPTION~ US 41 TO RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD (4 LANING~; 3.4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 & 7 SOUTH NAPLES - ROYAL FAKAPAL~ CRE~
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATIQ~
ORGANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ --_ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 246.8
Size of This ProJect~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
'et Year
.'" 1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
., .. Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
225
129 280
Land constructio~
4900
Other Total
45 300
41 450
490 5390
Total
384 280 4900
576 6140
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
91/92
1725
6.8
11730
0
11730
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPm OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs Cg-95%
DESCRIPTIONz CR-864 TO SR-84 (4 LANING); ~.O MILES
PROJECT LOCATIONs 3, 5 & 7
(#)
PROJECT # 11
GOLDEN GATE; SOUTH NAPLES: RO~L FAKAPALM
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISIONS TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONS SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
· Prior
· 1989-90
,Forecast
~'1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
~/' 1993-94
:,', ~ 1994-95
l~ture
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
240
1000
4730
LANE MILE
246.8
24 264
100 1100
473 5203
Total
240 1000 4730
597 6567
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
94/95
1725
6,0
0
~o350
40 226
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVF~ENT ELEMEN?
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMI~aJ~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS PROJECT # 12
PROJECT NAME: ISLES OF CAPRI ROAD (SR-951)
DESCRIPTION: }t~RCO BRIDGE TO US 41 (R/W ACQUISITION ONLY~: 6.5 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: $, 6 & 7 SOUT~ NAPLES: MARCO: ROYAL FA.KAPALM
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioiency~ 246.8
Size of This Projects - Q -
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
¢onstructio~
33
Fa~a
1045
1400
Cg~structio~
150
Other Total
108 1186
140 1540
15 165
: Total
33 2595
263 2891
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Xmpaot
None - state Road
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 13
PROJECT NAME: CR-951
DESCRIPTION: 23rd AVE.S.W. TO GOLDEN GATE BLVD. (4 LANIN~): 2.~ MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ & $ GOLDEN GATE: RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION: T~ANSPORTATION
D~PAR~M~: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: ~ECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienoy: ~46.8
Size of This Project: O
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Budget Year
1992-93
1993-94
1994_95
'.FUture
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constrgction
120
130 5100
Land CoDstruct,~o~
Other Total
12 132
523 5753
Total
250 5100
535 5885
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Number of Units
,Oross Cost
'.Less User Revenue
Net Impaot
90/91
$ 193~Q
- 0
$ ~93~0 ,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION: i & 2
(#)
PROJECT
PINE RIDGE ROAD
US 41 TO CR-31 ¢6 LANING); 2.0 MILES INCLb~ING URBAN
INTERCHANGE AT AIRPORT ROAD
NORTH NAPLES: CENTRAL NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
14
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATIQN
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 246.8
Size of This Project: 4,0
Prior
1989-90
i~i~.i. Forecast
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
'Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land constructto~
35O
800 400 -' 2100
1000
1500 8000
oth~r Total
35 385
330 3630
100 1100
950 10450
Total
1150 2900 10100
1415 15565
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Not Impact
91/92
1725
4.0
6900
0
6900
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY ,FOR~
TYPI OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME= RADIO ROAD
DESCRIPTION= ~R-31 TO SANTA BARBARA BLVD. (4 LANING~: 3.0 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION= 2, 3. & 4
(#)
15
CENTRAL NAPLES; GOLDEN GATE: EAST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥iSION= TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT= T~ANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION= ~ECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency= 246.8
Size of This Project=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
et Year
1991-92
" 1993 94
~ 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constr~ction
320
80 70
Land Construction
830 4600
othe; Total
32 352
15 165
543 5973
Total
400 900 4600
590 6490
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
,:First Year of Impact
~i~:',Cost per Unit $
'Number of units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Nit Impact $
91/92 ,
1725
6.0
10350
0
~0350
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0,
(years)
CAPITAL IMP~OFEMENT ELEME_NT.
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SU~¥ FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COU~TY ROAD~
PROJECT NAMEs RADIO ROAD
DESCRIPTION: SANTA BARBARA BLVD. TO DAVIS DLVD.
PROJECT LOCATION~ 3 GO~Q~N GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 16
(4 LANING); 1.5 MILES
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONS SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measuremsnt~ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~ 246.8
size of This Project= 9,0
Prior
1989-90
....Forecast
1990-91
~' ~' Budget Year
1993-94
1994-95
': · Future
. Total
FINANCIAL BUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Other Total
245
25 270
500
2O00
50 550
200 2200
245 500 2000
275 3020
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Ntu~ber of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
P3/94
1725
3,0
5175
0
5175
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT
PROJECT NAME~ RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD
DESCRIPTIONS US 41 TO POLLY AVENUE (4 LANING); 2.0 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ & ,,5 EAST NAPLES: SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
17
RRUPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioienoy~ ~46.8
Size of This ~roJect= 4.0
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
'Budget Year
1992-93
1993-94
·1994-95
l~ture
FINANCIAL SUMF~Y ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
CQnstruct~on Lan~ Construction
236
259
1500
3500
24 260
26 285
150 1650
350 3850
Total
495 1500 3500
550 6045
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Loss User Revenue -
Ntt Impact $
92/93
1725
4.0
6900
0
6900
BOOK
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
t
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME: GQODLETTE-FRAN~ RO~D (p~%SE I)
DESCRIPTIONS CARICA ROAD TO CR-846 (FIRST 2 OF 4 LANES); 2.5 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ ,NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
19
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION% TRANSPORTATION
D~PARTMENT% TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION% SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementt LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 246.8
Size of This ~roJect% 5.0
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
iBudget Year
1991-92
~'~.' · 1992-93
1993-94
'~/¥1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~o~structio~ LaDd Co~str~ctio~
200 250
9~her Total
1800 180
45 495
1980
Total 200 250 1800 225 2475
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Groes cost
Lese User Revenue
Not Impact
91/92
$ 1725
5,0 ~O
$ 8625 (years)
- ~
$ 8625
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 20
PROJECT NAME= ~ULF S~ORE DRIVE
DESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT BEACH RD. TO lllth AVENUE (3 LANES}; %,3 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORT~ NAPbES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE A~ENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: $~CONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 246.8
Size of This Project: - Q -
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~oDstruction La~d co~structio~
D E L E T E
RECONSTRUCTION ONLY BY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT
~i,!: Total
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
~ross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 2~
LIVINGSTON ROAD CNORTH NAPLES MSTU}
CR-846 TO IMPERIAL STREET + AN E-W ROUTE CQNNECTING TO
OLD 41; 2 LANES; 6.2 MILES
1 NORTH NAPleS
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATIQN
ORGANIZATIONS SECONDARy R0~DS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~ 246,$
Size of This ProJeot~ Q
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
'1990-91
Budget Year
'1.1991-92
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
625
244 500 250
Lan~ Construct~
Other Total
62 687
75 1069
Total
869 500 250
137 1756
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Pirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
9o/9%
$ ~7~5
12.4
$ 2~90
- 0
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT
PROJECT NAKE~ SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD/LOGAN BOULEVARD
DBBCRIPTIONI CR-896 TO SOUTH OF GREEN CANAL; 4 LANES; 1.0 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 3 & 9 GOLDEN GATE & URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
22
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DIPARTMENTI TRANSPORTATION
ORG~NIZATIONI SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
size of This ProJect~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
get Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructio~ Land Oo~structio~
15
175 450
2100
2327
LANE MILE
246.8
Z,9
Other ~
2 17
63 688
210 2310
233 2560
190 450 4427
508 5575
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Coat per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
Leis User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
1725
~,0
0
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTy ROADS
PROJECT NAME: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
DESCRIPTIONs US 41 TO CR-31:(4 LANES~: 2.2 MILES
PROJECT LOCATIONS 1 NORTH
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
PROJECT $ 23.
1990-91
Budget Year
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This ProJect~
LANE MILE
246.8
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
FINANCIAL SmUU%UY ($ IN TaOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
50
410 500
Lan4 Constructio~
1600 3800
5 55
86 996
545 5945
Total
460 2100 3800
636 6996
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
·ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
4,4
7590
7590
411-°"',. 237
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENt'
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 24
PROJECT NAME~ VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
DESCRIPTION: OAKS DOULEVARD TO CR-951 (FIRST 2 OF 4 LANES): 2.9 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ NORTH
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AOENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTI TRANSPORTATION
OROANIZATIONZ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioienoyl, 246,~
Size of This ProJeot~ O
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
,'1991-92
:1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
195
Land Construction Qther Total
400 1532 213 2340
110 11 121
COMPLETED OCTOBER 12, 1989
Total 195 400 1642 224 2461
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
F~ret Year of Impact
CoSt per Unit $
~.hsr of Units
Oross cost $ _
Less User Revenue -
Net Impaot $ _
90/9~ 1725
10000
0
10000
:~0,
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs VANDERBILT DRIVE
DESCRIPTION: ~llth AVENUE
PROJECT LOCATION: 1
(#)
25
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name
IMPACT
DIVISIONS TRANSPORTATION Unit
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 199
/
ORGANIZATION: $~CONDAR¥ ROADS of This ProJect~ /
FINANCIAL
Pre-
Year C. onstruction/ Land construct!~ 0t~er
Prior /
Foreoast /
/ OO
/
.udget Year / .Z-- ~-// /"
5200 520
5 Total Deficienoys /246.8
Total
1650
//~0 1500
IMPACT ON ~URE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of/Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Loss User Revenue -
Not Impact $ ·
5720
(years)
550
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
5200 720 7920
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY RO~D$
PROJECT NAME~ W~STgLOCK ROAO
DESCRIPTIONs CARSON ROAD TO $R-29 (2 LANES!: 1.0 MILES
PROJECT LOCATIONs 1~ IMMOKAL~
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TFJkNSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION,
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defiolenoys
Size of This ProJect~
LANE MILE
246.8
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1993-94
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Cg~str~tiO~ D~n4 Co~str~ct~o~
50
365 500
5 55
87 952
Future
Total 50 365 500
92 1007
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Yeer of Impact 91/92
Cost per Unit $ ~7~5
Number of Units ~,~ , , ,
Oross COSt $ 3450
LeSS User Revenue - 0
Net I~pact $ ~4~0
ESTII~ATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 27
PROJECT NAME: MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION (ROAD & BRIDGE SECTION}
DESCRIPTIONs AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER BCC APPROVED ROAD PROGRAM
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTHENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioienoys 246.8
Size of This Projects
Prior
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructio~ Lan4
1989-90 2
Forecast
1990-91 3
Budget Year
1992-93 2
~>1993-94 3
· 1994-95 3
Future 4
Const,ruct~oa
1760
700
847
495
305
627
625
3408
Other
Total
1761
702
850
497
307
630
628
3412
Total 20 8767 8787
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
aross cost $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impaot
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ZLEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ~o~Ds PROJECT
PROJECT NAME: ~AJOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
DESCRIPTION~ AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER BCC APPROVED 5-YEAR PLAN
PROJECT LOCATIONz
(#) (Planning District Name)
R~SPONSIBLE AOENCY
DXVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANI~ATION~ ~ECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Msasurement~ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioiency~ 246.8
Size of This ProJect~ N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
¢o~struct~oD Land
4
5
6
7
5
5
6
'25
~oDstruct~o~
888
511
500
757
485
6OO
624
2975
Total
892
516
506
764
490
605
630
3000
? 3~ Tota 1
63
7340
7403
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of impact 90/91
Cost per Unit $ 4500
Number of Units 6
Gross cost $ ~7OO0
Less User Revenue - 0
Net Impact $ _
~?QQO ~
242
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
QAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEN~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UMMAR~ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMES
DESCRIPTIONS
PROJECT LOCATIONS, ~
(#)
PROJECT # 31
BONITA BEACH ROAD
VANDERBILT DRIVE TO COUNTY LINE (4 LANING); ~-6 MILES
{HALF IN LEE COUNTy)
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: $~¢ONDAR~ ~OADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 246.8
Size of This Project: . 1,6
Prior
1989-90
~ Forecast
.Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS]
Pre-
~onstruct~o~ Land ~onstruct~o~
150
500
80O
2500
Ot~er Total
15 165
50 550
80 880
250 2750
Total
650 800 2500
395 4345
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact .93/94
Cost per Unit $ 1725
Number of Units
Gross Cost $ 2760
Less User Revenue - 0
Net Impact $ 2760
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PR0~EC~ SUM~JmY
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT
SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD
DAVIS BLVD. (SR-84) TO RATTLESNAKE-HAP[MOCK ROAD
(4 NEW LANES); 2,0 MILES
5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
32
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONz Tp~NSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORO~NIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementz LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~ 246.8
Size of This ProJect~ $,0
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~'
ConstructS02 Other
1989-90
Forecast
Budget Year
1992-93
1994-95
330 550
250 3000
88 968
325 3575
Future
Total
330 800 3000
413 4543
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
ESTIMATED USEFUL
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
N%m~er of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
~7~$
8.0
- 0
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROFEME~V~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY.FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION=
PROJECT
COUNTY BARN,,ROHO
DAVIS BLVD. (SR-84) TO RATTLESNAKe-HAMMOCK ROAD
~4 L~NING}: 2.0 MILES
5 SOUTH
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DXVINXON~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION.
ORGANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioienoy~ 246.8
Size of This Project~ 4,Q
: Prior
:- ~989-90
: Forecast
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
-~1993-94
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructi0~
330
620
2900
33 363
62 682
290 3190
Total
330 620 2900
385 4235
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oroe~ Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Xmpact
95/96
~7~5 ,
4.0
6900
0
$ 6900
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BLEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUHMARY FOP. M
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs ADVANCED R.O.W. ACQUISITION
DESCRIPTIONs
PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATIONs
(~)
(Planning District Name)
RBBPONSIBLB AGENCY
DMBIONs T]tANSPORTATION
D~PARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
~orecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~o~struct!on Land construction
Other
200
20O
200
200
200
200
1300
LANE MILE
246.8
200
200
200
200
20O
200
1300
Total
25O0
2500
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Ntuaber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
N/A
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAME: CARSON ROAD
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT
LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD TO IMMOKALEE DRIVE(2 NEW LANES);
0,6 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 11
(~)
IMMOKALEE
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBIONI TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT z TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION: $~CONDAR¥ ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementl
1991-95 Total Deficienc~:
Size of This Project:
LANE MILE
246.8
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
'.':Budget Year
1991-92
·1992-93
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
30
Other ?eta1
3 33
215 - 250 47 512
Total 30 215 250 50 545
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
NXLmber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
9%/92
1725
1,2
~070 0
2070
~00~
40, ; 247
20,
(years)
CAPITAL I~PROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUHM~RY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs ~R~ NORTH-SOUTH SCAD
DESCRIPTIONs CR-858 TO CR-846 ~2 NEW LANES); 5.7 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 10 CORK$CR~4
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 36
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥IBIONS TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTI TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEPICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defioienoyz
Size of This Projects
LANE MILE
246.8
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~"Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
5
LaDd CoDs~ructt0D Other
225 23
Total
5
248
Total 5
225 23 253
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~ret Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
90/91
1725
11,4
19670
19670
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITYs COUNTY ROAD~ PROJECT
PROJECT NAMEI ~SLES OF CAPRI ROAD {CR-951~
DESCRIPTIONs GOLDEN GATE BLVD. TO CR-846 (4 LANING); 3,0 MIL~
PROJECT LOCATIONs 8 & 9 RURAL ESTATES; URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RBBPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DBPARTMENTI TRANSPORTATIO~
ORGANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEPICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioilnoyl
Size of This Projects
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
,Budget Year
,1992-93
~,1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~onstNuct~on Land ¢onstruct~o~
160
3410
Other Total
16 176
341 3751
Total 160 3410
357 3927
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Plrst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Ntmber of Units
Loss User Revenue -
95/96
1725
6
~03~o
~o35o
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
gAPITAL IHPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT # 35,
PROJECT NAME: p~D~STRIAN OVERPASS ON S~-29
DESCRXPTIONz FARMWORJ{ERS VILLAGE
PROJECT LOCATION: ~
(~)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IM~OKALEE
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DMBION%
TRANSPORTATION
Unit of Measurement%
LANE MILE
Prior
DEPARTMENT z TRANSPORTATION 1991-95 Total Deficiency~
ORGANIZATION~ ~ECONDARY ROADS Size of This ProJect~
FINAI~CIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year Construction Land constructio~ Other
1989-90 100 10
.Forecast
1990-91 (300) 50
Budget Year 200
246.8
Total
110
55O
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
~ 1994-95
Future
Total
100
500 60 660
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Coot per Unit $
Ntuabsr of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
($) = State Funds
91/92
2000
2000
0
2000
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM)UtR¥ FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= COUNTY RO~D~
PROJECT NAMEI
DESCRIPTIONs
PROJECT
AIRPORT-PULLING RQAP
GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO PINE RIDGE ROAD (6 LANING)
~.6 MILES
PROJECT LOC~TION:
2
(#)
CENTRAL NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION= SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Defioienoys 246,$
Size of This Projects ~,~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
et Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land constructio~
480
3900
Other Total
48 528
390 4290
Total
480 3900
438 4818
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
94/95
8970
0 600~
Q~7o
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IM?ROV~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 4Q
PROJECT NAME~ ~OODLETT~-FRANK ROAD
DESCRIPTIONs GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO SOLANA ROAD (6 LANING~: 1.7 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION~ 2 CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATION~ ~ECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementc LA~E MILE
1991-95 Total Deficiencyc 246.8
Bize of This ProJeot~ ~,4
Prior
1989-90
".Forecast
1
';Budget Year
'~ 1991-92
';" 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructio~
300
2210
0t~e~ Total
30 330
321 2431
Total 300 2210
351 2761
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
' First Year of Impaot 94/9~
Cost per Unit $ ~7~
Ntt~ber of Units 3.4
Gross Cost $ 5~65
Less User Revenue - Q
Net Impact $
$865
BO0{
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEME~T~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SUI~iARY FORM_
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS
PROJECT NAMEI PINE RIDGE ROAD
DESCRIPTION: AIRPORT ROAD TO 1-75 (6 LANING); 2.0 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 9 URDAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 41
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONI TRANSPORTATION
D~P~TMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONI SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE
1991-95 Total Deficienay: 246.8
size of This Project: 4.0
~eAx
P~ior
19S~-90
~orecast
1990_91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
28O
500
200O
Other Total
28 308
50 550
200 2200
Total
280 500 2000
278 3osd
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
95/96
1725
4
0
6900
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT
PROJECT NAME1 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
DESCRIPTION1 US 41 TO GULFSHORE DRIVE (4 LANING): 1.4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION~ ~ NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
42
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION, TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
ORGA~IZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Heasurement~
1991-95 Total DeficienoyI
Size of This ProJect~
LANE MILE
246.8
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~1990-91
Budget Year
1991-9~
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
400
2800
Other Total
40 440
280 3080
Total 400 2800
320 3520
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
.Cost per Unit
'Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less Uaer Revenue
Met Znpact
93/94 ,
$
,,
$ 485Q
- Q
$ 4830
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT.
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS
PROJECT NAMEs TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US
DESCRIPTIONs DAVIS BLVD. TO AIRPORT ROAD (6 LANING); 1.2 MILE~
PROJECT LOCATION: 4
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONS $~CONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget
Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
PROJECT
EAST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defioienoys
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
35O0
470 (~5o)
Other
Total
6700 (2620)
~/A
N!A
470 (15o)
6700 (2620)
35O0
Total 470 6700 3500
10670
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
($) = State Funds
N/A - STATE ROAD
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS
PROJECT 44
PROJECT NAME: TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH
DESCRIPTION: GRADE SEPARATION AT PINE RIDGE RO%Q
PROJECT LOCATION: i & 2
(#)
NORTH NAPLES: C~NTRAL NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEF~
:i~,~ DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of
~" DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION . 1991-95 Deficiency: A
ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS, Size This Project: / N/A
?ii Year Construction L,a~.a / construction ~ Total
',~j'..: '.'." 1994-95
P.' ooo , oo oooo
~;...~' /, / . , -
~ T al 1000 1000 7100 900 10000
~g.~ First Year of ~pact N/A - STATE ROAD FACILITY
~.' ~.r of U~ts ~0 ·
Gross Cost ~$ (years)
Less ~ser Revenue -
~mt Impaot $ , ,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8U}~MARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS
PROJECT NAME: TAMIA~I TRAIL NORTH (us, 41),
DESCRIPTION: IMMOKALEE ROAD TO LAUREL OAK DRIVE 3.8 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION: 4,1
(~)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT= TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
~1991-92
:1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
PROJECT # 45
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeott
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~9~st~uction Land Co~st~uct~0n
1515 (5o4)
Other Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
5609 (1000)
1515 (S04)
5609 (~ooo)
Future
Total 1515 5609 7124
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATIN~ BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost per unit $
N~mhsr of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impact $
($) = State Funds
N/A - STATE ROAD
soo,
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEM~qT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT.,,MUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE R0~D$
PROJECT N~M~z
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATIONs 4 & 5
(;)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION
DBPARTMENTI TRANSPORTATION
ORGANIZATIONS ~ECONDARY ROADS
PaO~ECT # 46
TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD TO BAREFOOT WMS. ROAD
(6 LANING); 3.0.~ILES
EAST NAPLES: SOUTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: ~/A
1991-95 Total Dsfioienoy~ N~
Size of This Projeot~ ~/A
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Prior
Pre-
~gnstruction
Land construction
Other Total
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1992-9~
1196
1196
1993-94
1994-95
Future
4428
4428
Total 1196
4428
5624
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impaot $
N/A - STATE ROAD
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
, 20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs STATE ROADS
PROJECT NAHEs
DESCRIPTIONs
PROJECT LOCATIONs 4
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~
TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT, TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT #
TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST CUS 41)
AIRPORT ROAD TO RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD [6 LANING):
EAST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
ORGANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction $an~ C0nstruc~!on Other
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
678 678
(501) 2509 2509
(sol)
47
N/A
N/A
Total 678 2509 3187
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
($) = State Funds
N/A - STATE RO~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR/~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE RO~D$ PROJECT $ 46
PROJECT NAME~ DAVIS BOULEVARD fSR-84)
DESCRIPTION: AIRPORT ROAD TO KING'S LAKE BLVD. (4 LANING): 1.3 MILES
PROJECT LOCATION~ 4
(~)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
OR~ANIZATION~ SECONDARY ROADS
EAST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defioiencys
Size of This Projects
N;A
N;A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget
Year
199 -92
· : 1992-93
~'.; ~ 1993-94
:1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Othev
786 (300)
(790) 2912
786 (300)
(790) 2912
Total 786 (1090) 2912
3698
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
~ess User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A - STATE ROAD
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= ~T&TE ROADS PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME= DAVIS BOULEVARD,- $~-84 (4 LANING}; 1.0 MILE
DBBCRZPTIONZ KING'S LAKE BLVD. TO COUNTY BARN ROAD
PROJECT LOCATIONZ 3. 4 & $ GOLDEN GATE; EAST NAPLES; SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
4~
R~SPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION
ORaANIZATION= SECONDARY ROADS
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency= N/A
Size of This Project=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~et
· ?-i': 1992-93
1993-94
:'. 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
605 429
2240
Other Total
1034
2240
Total 605 429 2240
3274
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
aross Cost
Leis User Revenue
Not Impact
N/A - STATE ROAD
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
gAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUM]4ARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS
PROJECT # 50
PROJECT NAMEs TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH [US 411
DESCRIPTION:
IMMOKALEE ROAD TO WIGGINS PASS ROAD [6 LANING):
1.4 MILES
PROJECT LOCATIONs 1
(#)
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVZBIONz
TRANSPORTATION
Unit of Measurement:
DEPARTMENTs TRANSPORTATION
1991-95 Total Deficiencys
N;A
ORGANIZATIONs SECONDARY ROADS
Size of This Projects
N/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land constructio~
Other Total
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
"1990-91
· ' Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
}'hltur e
540
455
2000
55 595
45 500
200 2200
Total 540 455 2000 300 3295
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
aross cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
N/A - STATE ROAD
(years)
CAPITA~ IMPROVE/4ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMHARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS
PROJECT
PROJECT NAMEz SR 951
DESCRIPTIONz ~tAINSAIL DRIVE TO MARCO BRIDGE (4 LANING}
PROJECT LOCATIONS 6
(~)
MARCO
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION~ TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement~
DEPARTMENT~ TRANSPORTATION
OR~ANIZATIO}~ $~CONDARY ROADS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1991-95 Total Defioienoy~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
CoDstruction Lan4 construction Other Total
1990-91
Budget Year
~ ~ 1991-92
r ~' 1992--93
· ~ '""" 1993--94
4100 4100
7600 7600
1994--95
Future
N;A
N/A
N/A
TOtaI
11700 11700
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A - STATE ROAD
40 , . 263
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCY
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
SERVICE
AREAz County-wide
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
(x)
or Planning District
(quantity)
or Special Area X
.(X)
$ in thousanqs
(unit of measurement)
Size ,~
Pr~4ect This ~
N~ber ProJg~t Name Project Total
291.112 54 5569
291.002 District No. 6 (Lely) Basin Plan 155 155
291.101 Lely Canal Spreader Swale 3300 3455
291.107 Lely Main Canal - Lower 550 4005
291.108 Lely Main Canal - Middle 186 4191
291.109 Doral Circle Bridge/Weir 660 4851
291.110 Lely Main Canal - Upper 505 5356
291.111 Rattlesnake-Hammock North Swale - 159 5515
Naples Estate
Rattlesnake-Hammock North Swale -
Riviera Golf
291.113 Lely Branch Canal Weir _ 401 5970
291.114 Lely Branch Canal 627 6597
291.115 Lely Manor Outfall Canal Spreader 476 7073
291.116 Lely Manor Outfall Canal - Lower 222 7295
291.117 Lely Manor Outfall Canal - Middle 388 7683
291.118 Lely Manor Outfall Canal - Upper 714 8397
291.120 Lely Manor Canal 524 8921
291.121 Naples Manor/Treetops Canal 76 8997
291.122 Lakewood Outlet, Beachwood Drive & 179 9196
Duchess Court Culverts
291.123 Rock Creek/Hazel Road Culvert 59 9235
CAPITAL IMPROV~E~T ELEME~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTUReS PROJECT # 29~.002
PROJECT NAME: DISTRICT No. 6 (LELY) BASIN PLAN
DESCRIPTION: DETAILED ENG./ENV. STORMWATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 & 5 EAST NAPLES; SOUT~ NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement~ $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT~ WATER MANAGEMENT 1gg1-95 Total Defioienoy: F/A
ORGANIZATION: Size of This Projects %55
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year COnstruction Lan~ construction
Prior
Other Total
1989-90 155
Forecast
155
.1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
.~'1994-1995
.Total 155
155
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEME~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT BUM)IARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAMEs LELY CANAL SPREADER SWALE
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 291.101
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DMBIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Meas~ement= $ IN THQUSANDS
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiencys N/A
OR~NXZATION:
Size of This Project=
FINA/~CIAL SU)fl4~%RY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year Construction Land ~onstruct~o~ Other Total
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
.1990-91
."~. Budget Year
1991-92
224 224
273 1320 53 1646
1992-93
57 1320 53 1430
1993-94
'i;Future
Total
554 2640 106 3300
Il(PACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
.Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEME~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR){
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: LELY MAIN CANAL - LOWER
DESCRIPTIONs CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMP~0V~ENTS
PROJECT LOCATIONs 4 EAST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 291.107
RESPONSIBLE AOENCY
DIVISIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT
ORgANIZATIONs
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
~.~ Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiencys
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construct~o~ Lan4 Constructi0~ Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/A
~otal
92 440 18
550
Total 92 440 18
55O
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATINO BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Oross Coat $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impaot $
N/A
ESTIHATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CA?ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~OJECT SUMmArY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CA~AL$/ST~UCTURES
PROJECT NAME: LELY MAIN CANAL - MIDDLE
DESCRIPTION: C~NAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ ~91.108
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISZON~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement~ $ IN THOUSANDS
DEP~tRTMENT~ WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Defioiency~ N/A
ORGANIZATION~ Size of This Project: 156
FINAMCIAL SUMNARY ($ IN THOUSA~rDS)
Pre-
Year Construction Land co~struction Other Total
Prior
1989-90
[~:i), Forecast
1990-91
,,.Budget Year
}1-92
31 31
1992-93
~1993-94
1994-1995
Future
149 6 155
, ' Total
31 149
6 186
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEI~
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
~ROJECT SU~Y FORM_
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS;STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME= DORAL CIRCLE BRIDGE/WEIR
DESCRIPTIONz CANAL AND;OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUT~ ,NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 291.109
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ~NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WATER MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT=
ORGANI2ATION=
Prior
'1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
.. 1992-93
1993-94
1994-199§
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
unit of Measurement= $ IN THOUSANDS
1991-95 Total Dafi~iencyz N/A
Size of This Project= ~6Q
Other Total
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
q0nstructio~ Lan~ Co~struction
106
5
528 21
106
554
Total 111 528
21 660
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost par Unit
'Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Xmpa~t
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: LELY MAIN CANAL - UPPER
DESCRIPTION~ CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NA~L~S
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement~ $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency=
ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year Constr~ction Lan~ CoDs~ructio~ Other Tota~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
; 1990-91
.BUdget Year
~ 1991-92
~." 1992-93
1993-94
81 81
4 404 16 424
1994-1995
Future
~': Total
85 404 16 505
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Coet per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
N/A,. ,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT $
PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK NORTH SWALE - NAPLES ESTATES
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DI¥ISIONz ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
Unit of Measurement: $ IN THOUSANDS
1991-95 Total Deficiency: N/A
OR~J~NIZATION:
Size of This Project:
159
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~structio~ Land Co~st~uctio~
Other Total
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~"'~.'.1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
· . 1992-93
':~ :::;
~..!993-94
/"1994-1995
27 127
5 159
27 127
5 159
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
~.':.,.:' First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
N~er of Units
· :' Gross Cost
LOBI User Revenue
Net Xmpact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROV~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 291.112
PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK NORTH SWALE - RIVIERA GOLF
DESCRIPTION~ ~NAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION~ ,5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
ORG]%NIZATION:
Prior
1989-90
,~.Forecast
1990-91
~Budget Year
.1991-92
1992-93
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioiency~
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Constructio~ Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/~
Total
9
43 2
9
45
Total
9 43 2
54
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEN_~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMM~uRY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME= LELY BRANC~ CANAL WEIR
DESCRIPTION= CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 'LOCATION= 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 291.113
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT= WATER MANAGEMENT
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= $ IN THOUSANDS
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
ORG~NIZATION~
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUMNJ%RY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
4Q1
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
'1:1991-92
Pre-
Construction Land ~pns~ructio~
64
Other Total
64
' ::'?' 1992-93
': 3.993-94
:1994-1995
3 321
13 337
Future
Total
67 321
13 401
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
~os~ per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT,
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT ~U~Y FORM
~YRB OF PUBLIC FXCXLXTY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME= LELY BRANCH CANAb,,
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION= 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
;ROJECT # ~
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DXVZSXONZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency= ~/A
ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Pre-
Co~structio~ Lan4 Construct~o~ Other Total
1990-91
Budget Year
:].99i_-92
i992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
105
502 20
105
522
105 502
20 627
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact N/A
Cost per unit $
Number of Units
'GrOll Cost
LmSS User Revenue -
Net Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
cAPITaL IMPS0?E~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM]4ARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME= LELY MANOR OUTFALL SPREADER SWALE
DESCRIPTION= CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION= 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
P~ESPONSIBLB AGENCY
DMSION= ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPAR~(ENTs W~TER MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATIONs
Prior
1989-90
· .~ Forecast
Budget Year
'71992-93
' 1¢94-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUI~Y ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~s~ruct~o~ Lan~ ConstFuct~o~ Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/A
476
~Qta~
76
4
381 15
76
400
Total 80 381 15
476
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVF~IENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SU~ FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJBCT NAMEI LELY MANOR OUTFALL CANAL - LOWER
DESCRIPTIONs CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: $ SOUTH ~APL~$
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 291.116
RESPONSIBLB AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurementl $ IN THOUSANDS
D~P~RTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Defiolenoy~ N/A
ORGANIZATION:
Size of Thio Project:
FINANCIAL SUM~Y ($ IN THOUS;tNDS)
Prior
Pre-
Constructto~ Land Constructio~ 9ther
Total
1989-90
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
37 178 7
222
1993-94
· 1994-1995
Future
Tota i 37 178 7
222
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impaot
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Nit Xmpaot
,, N/A .
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FO~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME~ LELY MANOR OUTFALL CANAL - MIDDLE
DESCRIPTION~ C~NAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 sOUT~ ~Pb~S
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DI?ISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES unit of Msasurement~ $ IN THOUSANDS
DBPARTMENT~
ORG~NIZATION:
Prior
WATER MANAGEMENT
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction Other Tota%
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
~991-92
· ,1992-93 62 62
1993-94
"Future
3 310 13 362
TOtal 65 310 13 388
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
Pirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
1~/~
$
$ (years)
oo(
%,.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEME}~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUHMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: LELY MANOR OUTFALL CANAL - UPPER
DESCRIPTION~ CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROV~ENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 291.118
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurements $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency: N/A
ORGANIZATION: Size of This ProJect~ 714
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
YeaN
Prior
Pre-
Construction Land construction Other Total
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
.~,i%'1991-92
1992-93
1993-94 120 120
1994-1995
571 23 594
Future
;i~:. Total
120 571
23 714
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
-Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
'Net Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
C~PITAL IMpROVEmENT ELEME~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UHF~.RY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: LELY MANOR CANAL
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
,i'..-: Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Msasur~ment~
1991-95 Total Defioiency~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructio~ Lan~ Const%n~Ct~O~ Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
524
Total
88
419 17
88
436
Total 88
419 17 524
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
~ost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Lees Ueer Revenue
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS!STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME~ NAPLES MANOR/TREETOPS OUTLET
DESCRIPTION~ CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE ~pRov~NTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUT~ NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMBZON, ENVIBONME~TAL $~RVICES
DEPARTMENT~ WATER MANAGEMENT
ORGANI2ATION~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~ .. 1990-91
:'Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
~' 1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficieno¥~
SiZe of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN TaOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Co~structio~ other
$ IN THOUSANDS
Total
13
61 2
13
63
Total 13 61 2
76
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact N/A
CoSt per Unit $
Ntlmber of Units
GrOII Cost
Less User Revenue -
Net Impaot $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPm OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 291,122
PROJECT NAMEz LAKEWOOD OUTLET, BEECHWOOD DRIVE & DUCHESS COURT CULVERTS
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPleS
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
OR~%NIZATION:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
'.'..'Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioisnoyz
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction La~d Co~struotion other
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/A
179
28
5 146
28
151
Total
28 5 146
179
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Cross Cost $
Loss User Revenue -
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT S~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTUReS
PROJECT NAME: pOCK CREEK/HAZEL ROAD CULVERT
DESCRIPTION: CANAL AND/OR sTRUcTuRE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION:, 4 MST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 291.123
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISIONI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurementl $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency= N/~
OR~ANIZATION~
Size of This ProJect~
5~
FINANCIAL SUMI(ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year Cpnstructio~ Land Construction
Other Tota~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
[:,, .1990-91
i? Budget Year
~' .' 1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
10
47
2
10
49
Future
Total 10 47
2 59
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCY
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
DIVISIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
SERVICE
AREAS County-wide
or Planning District
(x) (~)
or Special Area ~
(x)
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
N;A
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
292.002
292.101
292.102
292.103
292.106
Pro4eot Name
Gordon River Extension Basin Plan
Gordon River Regional Detention
Facility No. 1
Gordon River Regional Detention
Facility No. 2
Gordon River Extension Main Channel
Gordon River Regional Detention
Facility No. 3
Size of
This OAmulative
Pro4ect Total
300 9535
2176 11711
1742 13453
1315 14768
3504 18272
40. , 283
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEN~
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 292.002
PROJECT NAME= GORDON RIVER EXTENSION DASIN PLAN
DESCRIPTION= DETAILED ENG./ENVIRONMENTAL STORMATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ & 2 FORTH NAPLES:CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DZVXSXONt ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENTz WATER MANAGEMENT
OR~ANIZATION~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurmmentz
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN TaOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land construct~o~ Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
To~a~
3OO
3OO
Total 300
3OO
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(~ears)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 292.101
PROJECT NAME= GORDON RIVER REGIONAL D~T~NTION FACILITy No. ~
DESCRIPTION= CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION= 2 CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
ORGANISATION=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~oDstructio~ Land Construction OtheK
$ IN THOUSANDS
~76
60
3
1800
301 12
1860
316
Total
63 1800 301 12
2176
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
first Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROV~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPm OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 292.102
PROJECT NAMEs GORDON RIVER REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY No. 2
DESCRIPTION: CA~AL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION: 2 C~NTP4%~ ~AP~ES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPAR~NT~ WATER MANAGEMENT
ORG;~NIZATIONs
·: Pr ior
1989-90
~.,. Forecast
-~ 1990-91
Budget Year
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ construction Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
1742
Total
51 1440
241 10
1491
251
Total
51 1440 241 10
1742
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Not Impact
N/A
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEF[
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: GORDON RIVER EXTENSION MAIN CHANNEL
DESCRIPTION= CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LOCATION= ~ CENTRAL NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # ~92.103
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency= ~/A
ORQ]~NIZATZON=
Size of This Project:
1315
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Year construct~o~ Da~4 cons~wuctio~
0th~r Total
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
?,.~.1990-91
~iBudget Year
i::1991-92
- 1992-93
199:3-94
:' 1994-1995
Future
221 1052
42 1315
Total 221 1052
42 1315
First Year of Impact
co.t per unit
Number of Units
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
QrOII Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
T/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUJ4MARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 292.106
PROJECT NAMEr GORDON RIVER REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY No. 3
DESCRIPTIONt CANAL AND/OR STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT LO~ATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIYISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $ IN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency: N/A
OR~%NIZATION: Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUM](ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Cons~ruction Land Construction Other Total
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
'1993-94
1994-1995
34 2800
2834
Future 84 563
670
Total
128 2800 563
23 3504
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
· rols Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
ESTIMATED usEFUL
LIFE OF'
FACILITY
(years)
cAPITAL I~P~0VEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SSRVICES
T~PZ OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
SERVICE
AREA: County-wide __
or Planning District
(X) (#)'
or Special Area X
(x)
1991-9S DEFICIENCY:
N/A
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
293.001
293.002
Pro4ect Name
District No. 7 (Phase 2)
Aerial Mapping
Cochatchee River System
Basin Plan
Size of
Project Total
82 18,354
260 18,614
gRPITAL IMPROyEMENT ELEME}!T
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS;STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: DISTRICT No. 7 (Phase 2~ AERIAL MAPPING
DESCRIPTION: ~ERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ & 9 NORTH NAPLES: URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 293.Q0~
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ~NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
D~tRTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
ORG~NIZATION~
Prior
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-9S Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction other
1989-90 82
Forecast
1990-91
'i~? Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Future
$ IN THOUSANDS
Total
82
Total 82 82
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
F~rst Year of Impact N/A FACILITY
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
G~oss Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impact $
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT ~ 293.002
PROJECT NAMEI COCOHATCHEE RIVER SYSTEM BASIN PLAN
DESCRIPTIONS DETAILED ENG./ENVIRONMENTAL STORMW~TER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION: I & 9 NORTH NAPLES;URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurementl SIN THOUSANDS
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT 1991-95 Total Deficiency~
OR~ANISATIONs
SiZe cf This Projects
260
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
coDstructi0~ Land Construction
Other Total
Prior
1989-90
FOrecast
1990-91
et Year
1991-92
260
260
' 1992-93
1993-94
)4-1995
Future
:'~--. Total
260
260
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~ret Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Ozoss Cost
Less User Revenue
Met Impact
Nih
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ECONCILIATION OF PROJECT8 TO ~9~-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
County-wide or Planning District or Special Area ~
(X) (~) (X)
BERVICE
1991-95 DBPICIENCY:
PlA
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
294.001
294.002
Pro4eot Name
Main Golden Gate Aerial Mapping
Main Golden Gate Basin Plan
~ize of
This ~
Pro~ect Total
315 18,929
320 19,249
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPm OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: .~N GOLDEN GATE AERIAL MAPPING
DESCRIPTION: AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
PROJECT LOCATIONs 3 & 8 GOLDEN GATE: RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 294,00~
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: W~T~R MA.NAGEMENT
OROANIZATION:
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
$ IN THOUSANDS
~15
Prior
Pre-
CoDstruction ,~ ~and Co~struction Othe~
Total
1989-90
'. FOrecast
?:,~i1990-91
Year
'~ti991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
315
315
F~ture
Total 315
315
F~rst Year of Impact
~:Coet per Unit $
Number of Units
Orosl Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATIN~ BUDGETS
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 294.002
PROJECT NAME: MAIN GOLDEN GATE BASIN PLAN
DESCRIPTION: DETAIbED ENG./ENVIRONM~NTAb STOR~ATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATIONs 2,3,8 & 9 CENTRAL NAPLES: GOLDEN GATE;
RURAL ESTATES: URBAN ~STAT~S
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSIONI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT
OR~ANIZATION~
Prior
.'1989-90
,Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Dsficiencys
Size of This ProJect~
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction Other
!992-93
:[~993-94
;:'1994-1995
Future
$ IN THOUSANDS
320
T0ta%
320
Total 320
320
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENTs WATER MANAGEMENT DI¥ISION= ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPZ OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
County-wide
SERVICE
1991-95 DEFICIENCY~
or Planning District or Special Area ~
(X) (~) (X)
~;A
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
295.002
Pro4eo~ Name
Henderson Creek Basin Plan
Progeo~ Total
160 19,409
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # ~
PROJECT NAME= HENDERSON CREEK BASIN PLAN
DESCRIPTION= DETAILED ENG./ENVIRONMENTAL STORMWATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION= 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT= WATER MANAGEMENT
OR~ANISATION=
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Construction Lan4 ~onstructio~ Other
1990-91
;Bgdget Year
~1991-92
160
160
-93
"i993-94
1994-1995
Total
160
160
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rSt Year of Impact
~oet Unit .. per
Ntl:liber of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
296
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 199~-95 DEFICIENC~
D~PJ~RTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTURES
County-wide
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
or Planning District or Special Area ~
'(x') (x)
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
Size of
]~ Project Name ProJeo~ Total
Faka Union Aerial Mapping
Faka Union Basin Plan
296.001 105
296.002 160
19,514
19,674
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEN~
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: FAKA-UNION AERIAL MAPPING
DESCRIPTION, AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
PROJECT LOCATIONs 7 & 8
(#)
PROJECT # 296.001
ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK: RURAL ESTATES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DXYXSION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
D~PARTMENT: WATER M~NAGF/~ENT
ORG]%NIZATION:
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Prior
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
$ IN THOUSANDS
105
1989-90
Forecast
Pre-
Construct$on Land construct~o~ Other
Total
1990-91
"~'i ' Budget Year
1991-92
105
105
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
Total 105
105
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cos~ per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Ne2 Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LiFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 296.002
PROJECT NAME: FAKA-UNION BASIN
DESCRIPTION: DETAILED ENG./ENVIRONMENTAL STORMWATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION: 7 & 8 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK; RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAG~ENT
ORGANIZATION:
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
$ IN THOUSANDS
160
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Pre-
Construction Dang Construction 9ther
TOtal
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Future
160
160
Total
160
160
First Year of impact
Cost per Unit
.Number of Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCT~S
County-wide
SERVICE
DEFICIENCY=
(x)
or Planning District
~/B
(quantity)
or Special Area ~
(f) (X)
$ IN THOUSAND~
(unit of measurement)
297.001
297.002
Pro4ect Name
Southern Coastal Aerial Mapping
Southern Coastal Basin Plan
P~o~ect
53
180
19,727
19,907
,oo '40 , . 300
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEME~
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT BuMPy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME: SOUT~ERN COASTAL BASIN ~ERIAb MAPPING
DESCRIPTION= ~RI~L TOPOGRAPHIC MA?PIFG
PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-pALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 297.001
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT
ORaANIZATION:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOU~IANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constr~ction Other
$ IN THOUSANDS
Total
53 53
Total 53 53
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Yirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A.
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
$ (years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT ~U~MARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES PROJECT # 297.002
PROJECT NAMEs ~OUTHERN COASTAL BASI~ PbAN
DESCRIPTIONs DETAILED ENG./ENVIRONMENTAL STORMWATER BASIN PLANNING
PROJECT LOCATION= 7 ~OYAL FAKe-PALM CRE~
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT~ WATER MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATIONS
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
'1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiencyt
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construct~o~ Lan~ Constructio~ Other
$ I~ THOUSANDS
F/A
Tota%
180
180
Total 180
180
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
l~m~er of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
,o,, 40,, , 3'02
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCY
DEPARTMENT: WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS AND/OR STRUCTUR~
County-wide
SERVICE
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
or Planning District or Special Area ~
(X) (#) (X)
(quantity)
$ IN THOUSANDS
(unit of measurement)
Thi
:..Number Pro~ect N~e ~ Total
Barron River Aerial Mapping
298.001 53
19,960
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMEN/~
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SU~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: DRAINAGE CANALS/STRUCTURES
PROJECT NAME= DARRON RIVER AERIAL ~APpING
DESCRIPTION: AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
PROJECT LOCATION: ~0 CORKSCREW
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 298.001
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION= ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT~ WATER MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION=
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
$ IN THOUSANDS
N/A
53
Prior
Pre-
Construction Land constru~t.~o~ other
Total
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
.Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-1995 53
53
Future
Total 53
53
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact N/A
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
407 304
ESTIMATED US~}UL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95
DEPARTMENTs EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES
DIVISIONs EMERGENCY SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs EMS SUBSTATION
SERVICE
County-wide X or Planning District
(x)
XgPX-95 DEFZCIENCYS
(quantity)
or Special Area
.(X)
ALS UNIT
(unit of measurement)
303
304
Pro4ect Name
Golden Gate Parkway and
Airport Road
System Status Float Unit
Location to be determined
Size of
This Cumulative
Pro!eot Total
i i
I 2
i 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION
PROJECT NAME= SOUTH TAMIAMI TRAIL fb~bY)
DESCRIPTION= EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE
PROJECT LOCATION=
(;)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION=
DEPARTMENTs
ORGANIZATION=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
(Planning District Name)
EMERGENCY SERVICES
EMERGENCy ~SDICAL
SERVICES
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
PROJECT $ 301
3.1 75 151.3
ALS ~IT
Other Total
96.5 325.9
Total
3.1 75 151.3
96.5 325.9
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rst Year of Impact
C~st per Unit
Number of Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
90/91
;83~oo
183800
14~0oo
42800 ._
4U , ,3'06
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
3O
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMEZ~T ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION
PROJECT # 302
PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY & AIRPORT ROAD
DESCRIPTION: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE
PROJECT LOCATION: 2
(#)
CENTRAL NAPbES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION:
EMERGENCY SERVICES
Unit of Measurement:
ALS UNIT
DEPARTMENT
EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
ORGANIZATION:
~ear
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructio~
Other Total
1990-91
'Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
3.1 75 151.3
96.5 325.9
'1993-94
1994-95
Future
Total
3.1 75 151.3
96.5 325.9
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 91/92
Cost per Unit $ 264500
Number of Units 1
Gross Cost $ 264500
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
141000
123500
40.,, ,,307
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
30
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION
PROJECT NAME: ~YSTEM STATUS FLOAT UNIT
DESCRIPTION: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
PROJECT LOCATION:
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION:
DEPARTMENT:
ORGANIZATION:
EMERGENCY SERVICES
~ERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioiency~
Size of This Project:
ALs UNIT
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~struotion Land Construction
3.1 75 151.3
Other Total
96.5 325.9
Total
3.1 75 151.3
96.5 325.9
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Hat Impact $
94/95
264~0Q
264500
14~000
123500
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
30
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION
PROJECT NAME: LOCATION TO BE D~TERMINED BASED ON NEED
DESCRIPTION: ~MS SUBSTATION AND
PROJECT LOCATION: UNDETERMINED
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
PROJECT # 304
DIVIBION:
DEPARTMENT~
ORGANIZATION:
Prior
EMERGENCY SERVICES
EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
Abs UNIT
1
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 constructio~
3.1 75 151.3
Other Tota~
96.5 325.9
Total
3.1 75 151.3
96.5 325.9
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
N%uaber of Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
95/96
$ ~64~Q0
1
$ ~64~00
- 141000
$ ~23500
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS T0 $99~-95 DEFICIENC~
DEPARTM~: SHERIFF
DIVISION:
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY JAIb
SERVICE
AREAl
County-wide
~ or Planning District
(x)
xgg/-g5 DEFICIENCY:
(quantity)
or Special Area
(X)
BED~
(unit of measurement)
Progect Name
Collier County Jail
Size o~
Total
400 beds ,400
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: JAIL HOUSI~$
PROJECT NAME: COLLIER COUNTY JAIL
DESCRIPTION: 400 ADDITIONAL BEDS
PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 400
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION:
DEPARTMENT:
ORGANIZATION:
CQUNTY MANAG~
OFFICE OF CAPITAL
pBOJE~T MANAGEMENT
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Projects
BEDS
335
4QQ
:.? . Prior
1989-90
Forecast
' 1990-91
'~" ~' Budget Year
:"'., 1991-92
' 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construction
650 7800
other Total
8 oo
'Total
650 7800
350 8800
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Ntt~ber of Unite
Oross Cost $ _
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
92/93
1611000
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
100
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCy
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY
DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY
SERVICE
County-wide X
(x)
or Planning District
or Special Area
(x)
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
45,806
(quantity)
SOUARE FEET
(unit of measurement)
5OO
5O2
5O3
5O5
5O6
5O7
project Name
Headquarters Addition
Collier North Branch
Marco Island Branch Addition
Immokalee Branch Addition
Golden Gate Branch Addition
Vineyards Branch Library
This %~uaulative
Pro4ect Total
25,800 25,800
2,000 27,800
3,300 31,100
2,500 33,600
3,500 37,100
9,000 46,100
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY PROJECT # 50Q
PROJECT NAME~ ~ADOUARTERS LIBRARY ADDITION
DESCRIPTION= 25.000 SO.FT. ADDITION AT 650 CENTRAL AVENUE. NAPL~$.,,FL.
PROJECT LOCATION: 13 NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥IBIONz PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENTz LIBRARY
ORGANIZATION~ HO AND ADMIN.
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
i991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
' Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project~
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction
40
213
La~d construction other
45.806
25.800
Total
4O
213
6O
5
2785
2845
500 505
Total 318 2785
500 3603
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Yirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
%89,935
40,000
149,935
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(Years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR]~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FAClLITYI PUBLIC LIBRARY
PROJECT NAMEI COLLIER NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY
DESCRIPTION= ADDITION TO BRANCH LIBRARY
PROJECT LO~ATION~ i NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 502
RESPONSIBLE AaENCY
DI¥ISION= PUBLIC SERVICES , ,
DEPARTMENT~ LIBRARY
OR~ANIZATION~ COLLIER NORTH BRANCH
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project:
SO.FT
45.806
2.000
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructi~ Lan~ g0nstruotio~
29 250
other Total
35
279
35
Total 29 250
35 314
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATINa BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
N%Lmber of Units
aross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
4,000
.1.000
3.0O0
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(years)
~A?ITAL IMPROVEME~ ZLEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FQR/~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs PUBLIC LIBRARY
PROJECT NAME= }{ARCO ISLAND BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION
DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO, EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY
PROJECT LOCATIONs 6 MARCO
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT ~ 503
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENTs LIBRARY
ORGANIZATION: MARCO ISLAND BRANCH
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
45.806
3.300
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
.-1990'91
/.''Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
COnstruction Land Construction
25
4
300
ot~er Total
5O
25
354
Total 29 300
50 379
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
93194
4,000
1,00Q
3.000
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEVEN?
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC bIBP4~R¥
PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE BRANCH LIBRARY ~DDITION
DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY
PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKAL~$
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 505
RESPONSIBLE AOENCY
DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENTs LIBRARY
ORG~NIBATION~ IMMOKALEE BRANCH
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeotl
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
199~-9~
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Construction
25
4
250
other
35
SO.FT.
45.806
2.500
Tote%
25
254
35
Total 29 250
35 314
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
93/94
33,366
4,000
29,366
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEME~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRAry
PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION
DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BRANCH LIBRA, BY
PROJECT LOCATION: $ GOLDEN GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION:
P,.UBLIC SERVICES
Unit of Measurement:
SO. FT.
DEP]%RTMENT: LIBRARY
ORGANIZATION: GOLDEN GATE BRANCH
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 45,806
Size of This Project: 3.50Q
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS3)
:' Prior
Forecast
Pre-
ConstructIo~ Land
constructio~
Other
Total
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
'1992-93
25
10
6
325
25
10
331
1993-94
55 55
1994-95
Future
!~.. Total
41 325
55 421
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Y~ret Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
~u~ber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
93/94
4,00Q
1.000
40,,,,317
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT S~¥ FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= PUBLIC LIBRARY
PROJECT NAMEI VINEYARDS BRANCH LIBRARy
DESCRIPTION~ 9,000 sq. ft. BRANCH LIBRARY
PROJECT LOCATION=
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISIONI
DRPARTMENTI
OR~%NIZATION~
URBAN ESTATES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
-1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
PROJECT # 502
PUBLIC SERVICES
LIBRARY
VINEYARDS BRANCH
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~struot~o~ Land Construotion Other
Unit of Measurement~ SO.FT.
1991-95 Total Defioienoyl 45,806
Size of This ProJect~ , 9.000
68
855 140
68
995
Total
68 855 140 1063
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue *
Net Impaot
State Aid to Libraries
95/96
105,912
i3,~g
9~,66~
BO0~
40 318
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEME~V~ ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS, TO ~991-95 DEFICIENCY
DBPARTMENT: LIBRARY DIVISION: pUBLIC SERVICES
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY BOO~ ¢0~LECTION
BERVICE
County-wide
1991-95 DEFICIENCY:
X or Planning District
(x)
38,235
(quantity)
550
Pro4ect.~ame
Library Book Collection
319
or Special Area
(~) (X)
BOOKS
(unit of measurement)
Pro4ect Total
38,235 38,235
CAPITAL !MPRO?~NT ELEMEN~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMM~AR¥
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARy BQOK STOCK
PROJECT NAME: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTION
DESCRIPTION: DUDGET FOR LIBRARY BOOKS
PROJECT LOCATION:
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONz PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY
ORGANIZATION: ~O AND ADMIN.
(Planning District Name)
PROJECT # ~5Q
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: BOOKS
1991-95 Total Deficiencyz ~
Size of This Project: 3~,235
Year
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
.'1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
other Total
384 384
391 391
248 248
248 248
248 248
248 248
Total
1767 1767
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Lsss User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
,oo 40 . 320
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
VARIES
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~E~,ONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-95 DEFICIENCY
DZPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL
PROJECTS MANAGEMENT
DI¥ISION: COUNTY MANAG~
TYPZ OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
County-wide ~
(x)
SERVICE
AREA:
or Planning District
(quantity)
(~)
1991-95 DEPICIENCY~
or Special Area
(x)
(unit of measurement)
600
605
p~oJect Name
New Courthouse
Building W Expansion
New Agriculture Center
Thi~ ~
Pro~ect Total
46,000 46,000
15,000 61,000
12,000 73,000
CAPITAL IMPRO?E~ENT EDEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
PROJECT NAME: F~4 COURT~.OUS~ - FINISH ADDITIONAL FLOORS
DESCRIPTION: ~0URTROOMS AND RELATED FACILITIES
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBZONz
DEPARTHENTz
ORGANIZATION~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
.1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
4
(#)
SAST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
COUNTY MANAGER __
OFFICE OF CAPITAL
PROJECTS
PROJECT # 600.
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measuremsnt~ SQ.FT,
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 113.643
Size of This Project: . 4~.00Q
Note: Original structure contains
69,000 sq.ft, finished
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
¢onstructio~ Land Construction
Other Total
458 7628
574 8660
220 2680 820 3720
Total
678 10308
1394 12380
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
90/9%
~.32
115,000
266,800
266.800
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
50
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMM~Y FOR~
TYP! OP PUBLIC FACILITYs GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 604
PROJECT NAME: DUILDING W EXPANSION
DESCRIPTION: WAREHOUSE ADDITION INCLUDING DAY CARE FACILITY
PROJECT LOCATION~ 4 EAST N~PL~S
(#) (Planning District Name)
~BPONSIBL! A6ENCY
DIVISIONs
DEPARTMENTs
ORGANIZATION:
CQU]~TY MANAGER
OFFICE OF CAPITAL
PRO~ECTS MANAGEMENT
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: SO. FT
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ ~
Size of This
15,000
Year
Prior
1989-90
..Forecast
· 1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUM~Y ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction L~d ~onstructio~
Other Total
100 2000 2100
Total 100 2000 2100
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
~2/~3
2.32
~5,000
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
34,800
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMAR~ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT # 605
PROJECT NAME= AGRICULTURE CENTER
DESCRIPTION~ NEW STRUCTURE TO HOUSE AGRICULTURE ACTIVITIES
PROJECT LOCATION= TO BE DETERMINED
(#) (Planning District Name)
DIVI S ION =
DEPARTMENT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
COUNTY MANAGER
OFFICE OF CAPITAL
PROJECTS MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION= ~DMIN,
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= SO.FT
1991-95 Total Deficiency= 113,643
Size of This Project=
12,000
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
,1991-92
::~:'." 2.992-93
:71993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land Cons~rvctio~
60
20
- 1000
Other Total
6O
80 1100
Total 80 1000
80 1160
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
2.32
12,000
27,840
27,840
!~00~,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
40
(years)
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-1995 DEFICIENCY ............
['Ar~l'9 CAPITAL rAe. lL{ll[.q
LEVEL PF 9Ekvl('[ SIAHllARC: tl~?. )(, ~er c{uit~
(/,2('l,~ll) 178
l,&~9,057
6,020~015
1,8')7,577 1142
1~158,071 $126
llHE F'ERIOD
rACILIIIES r A.'.'II.I I I£~
F L, FULA1 II,fl NEOUIFEI~ PLAN&'ED I ACILI l lES SURr'LUSI
~CD-VII)£ PERIl} AT $177 IH CIE AVAILABLE (~EFICIENCY}
PRESENI 10
YEAR 6CO~TII
I01~0-~/%
~EAR SIIblOl~l
~O 5-YR GRONTI~
lO ~EAR llllnt
J65,388 70,117,33~ 1,521,0')0 12,~1t,025 78
4q,OO0 &,005,3£0 18,S~?,OOd 33,4%,('25
~15,:C0 " ~"
4~,789 6,0?(,DU 0 ~L495,025
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-1995
I'ARKS AHD RECREATION:LOSS · TI?2.UO IIIV[HTORY VALIIE/CAPITA
ACTUAL VALUE flEOUI~:ED IH THE CIP
T~ASED L'Jfl INDIVIDUAL fACILITY STANDARDS
1YPE IINENIURY IHVEIITORY IflVEIITOEY IHVEIITCRY
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
PDPLq. ATIDIIICQ-¥1DE PERM) 1~2,561 l~5,~08 175,~65 tes,Tu
,DEFICIENCY
III'IDi1ORY IHVENTORY IHVEKTORY
VALUE V~LUE VALUE
1t5,~25 205,~07 2LS,2&8
IAS~ETBALLIVOLLEYBALL
IICI'CLE 1RAILS 247~C7& ~6~,8~9 ~6,,2~ 294,&IU St~,Ot2.
CHIL~qEIIS PLATGROUtlDS ]bb,O(,u 4,)5,9~U 428,450 451,0G~ 413,550
COI~IMIIT! POQLS 540,00~ 600,000 600,000 66~,~00 720,000
FIIIIESS TRAILS ~70,OO0 2ffO,O0~ TIO,OOO 325,..f, 345,00,1
FOQTllALL/SOCCER FIELDS ~,217,7~O 1,~(,7,~
dOG~IM T~ILS I42,56U 15~,1~A 163,680 171,60~ [82,160
IIIJLII'~E CEflTERS
OI.111PIC POOLS 2,010,r,O~ 2,~O0,O,)h 2,10p,000 2,5~0,0o0 2,760,000
PI£#l: PAVILIOilS 302,40q 1~7,6~0 347,200 36~,8u0 386,400
RACOUETDALL COURTS 754,655 799,578 8~7,416
glJ~FLEIOARI COURTS I13,400 122,850 130,200 137,55~ 144,900
SOI:TIALL FIELDS 2,37~0~ 2,514,G00 2,728,~00 2,882,0fl~ 3,0~6,000
TE~IIIS COglqlS 3~4,O0~ 351,OO0 372,0eO ]?~,~O 414,O00
TRACt. i FIELD
IQA1 lIMPS 2,72%2U ~,~5~,585 3,352,07~ 3,5~,~5 3,7~]~423
$240,00~ $250,000
635,500 665 000
329,346 ~41 791
496,100 518 560
4,606,000 4,e&q 000
720,000 780
~623,&00 1,7~$ 800
19~,OBO 2~0 &40
1,560,000 1,690
2,760,000 2,V?O,O00
406,000 425,600
~52,250
~,170,000 3,$4~,000
4~5,000
229,82!
3)911,665 4,10~,974
TOTAL $&?,~11,555 12'),999,952 $22,0;4,172 S2~,AZB,689 $24,942,061 S25,860,315 $27,370,70~
Pr. II CAI'HA VACUE
$127 1127 I1~ ti2& $128 S126 1127
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1991-1995 DEFICIENCY
rAt:rs ArID F:['L'I~[A[IOII: LOSS; ll~2.t,, III'IErlT.111Y V,lLUC./l't,r'll~, I~I:IUAL '/ALII[ I'LANII[P IX I1'[ Lit'
FACILITY 19eO'.G~ 1989-~0 |gQO-~| 1911'-~2 !?~:-93 19~3-94 I~1-~5
ITeL IN':EII:I}IIY IIIY[IIIOI:Y II:V[IIIOR! !IIV[NIOR1 INYEI41ORY IlNENTL~Y IIIV[KIORY
¥~L UE VALIJ[ YAI.U[ VALUE YAL~[ VALUE VALUE
Afll"l TII[.%I[I:S I I r.,,.,, (,9,q $ I,,,,,,~,"
CO~hU~ I I Y POOLS ,., O 0 ')
FIT~S6 I~AILS
4~it~ TR~IL~ ~,~,400 ~5,4t0 55,4('0 91,H9
~T~IC FOOLS
rlCfllC PAVILiOX5
RAC~TIALL COURT5 410,040 546,7g0 516,720 688,420
~llALL FIELDS 2,86~,')(~
lENtilS COURTS 7~0,(,"('
IRAC~ % FIELD :
~AT RAfl;S
2,5~',~0~ 2,520,000 2,5~0,000
59!,.5,),1 507,500 '507,50fl
2,5~L,8;4 2,77~,2t6 2,77~,2L6
451,000 451,000 451,000
600,000 &00,000 ~00,000
~0~,0~0 400,004 400,000
1,8~4,000 1,604,000 1,804,000
!,~')0,~90 1,300,000 1~$00,000
!,8,240 &$4,640 134,640
2,~'.1,000 2,~00,U00 2,300,000
28,00U ~]6,000 $~6,000
688,420 e88,420 988,4~0
2~L,000 2S~,~)0 23~,000
~,6~e,000 2,640,000 2,640,000
l,O2',OOO t,O20,O00 1,020,000
0 t~t,520 l~t,520
~,~64,1~Z ~,2lt,7t& 3,2qt,716
10IAL 111,H9,~25 112,1;9,308 $16,72,.t,416 $22,~65,542 tZ4,124,22& 126,02B,ON $26,028,014
PER CAI'IfA VALUE
175 t74 St'); - sl~t $124 $127
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
?ROJE¢~ 8U~RY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: AMPHITHEATER
PROJECT NAME~ AMPHITHEATER
DESCRIPTION: STAGE, BAND SHELL ETC-
PROJECT LOCATION: i NORTH NAPLES
(#)
PROJECT # 7QQ
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ PUBLIC SERVICES
DEP]%RTMENT~ PARKS & RECREATION
ORG~tNIZATION: ADMINISTRATION
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Xsasurmmsnt~ AMPHITHEATER
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
Yoar
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
'.1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSAND~I)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 Construction
10 80
other Total
10 100
Total 10 80
10 100
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number cZ Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
6,000
1,000
5,000
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPR0V~MENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BICYCLE TRAILS
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
;1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
PROJECT # 70~
DICYCLE TRAILS
CONSTRUCT pATHS TO SCHOOLS & PARKS W~ERE APPROPRIATE
¢OFNECT BI~E TRAIbS: 46.2 MILES (Funded iD Roads
Construction Budget)
COUNTY-WIDE
(#) (Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ MILES
1991-95 Total Deficienc~: 0
Size of This Project: 38,6
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction Other Tota~
19 175 194
28 261 289
28 261 289
26 234 260
27 250 277
Total 128 1181 1309
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROV~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COM~I~ITY PARK
PROJECT NAME ~
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 70~
COM3~J]~ITY PARK #6
BALLFIELDS. COURTS. LANDSCAPE. RESTROOMS. PLAY AREAS AND
PA~KING LOTS
5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION~ ADMINISTRATION
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: AMPHITHEATER
1991-95 Total Deficiency: $
Size of This Project: ~
Prior
~1989-90
Forecast
1990.91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ construction
200 768 -' 24
1374
otheN Total
992
100 1474
Total
200 768 1398
100 2466
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/9~
131,600
12,000
119 , 600
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR)~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK pHASE II
PROJECT # 703
PROJECT NAMEs ¢0~/NITY PARK PHASE
DESCRIPTION:
64 FACILITIES IN PHASE II COMMUNITY PARKS, COMMUNITY
CENTERS, BASKETBALL. BASEBALL, FITNESS TRACKS. ETC.
PROJECT LOCATIOB: 11. 1. 6. 4. 3
(;)
IMMOKALEE. NORTH NAPLES. MARCO. EAST
NAPLES, GOLDEN GATE
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGEBCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION:
PU2LIC SERVICES
Unit of Measurement:
S/Capita
DEPARTMENT:
ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION
Prior
PARKS & RECREATION
Size of This Projects
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land Constructio~
604
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 13,800,000
6,521.000
0t~e~
Total
604
1989-90 550
Forecast
696
· 1990-91 37 1921
.Budget Year
· ..i. 1991-92 63 2698
~.1992-93 30 514
- ~1993-94 30 1048
".1994-95
20 1266
60 2018
60 2821
20 564
40 1118
Future
Total 710 7481
20 8391
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rst Year of Impact 90/91
Cost per Unit
Nl~mber of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
301,300
0
301.300.
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM~4ARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMI4/INITY SWIMMING pOOL
PROJECT NAMEI COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL
DESCRIPTIONI ~5 METER pOOL, CHANGING ROOMS, KIDDY pOOL
PROJECT LOCATION~ ~ IMMOKALEE
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 704
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: ~ARKS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION~ ADMINISTRATION
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
:~i' 1990_91
Budget Year
1991-92
· 1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: COMMUNITY POOL
1991-95 Total Deficiency: ~.3
Size of This Project: 1
FINANCIAL SUF~Y ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land ¢o~s~ruot~o~ Other
11
562 27
11
589
Total 11
562 27 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 93/94
Cost per Unit $
H~mher of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
234,000
lO,250
233,750
3'32
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR]4
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: MULTI PURPOSE FACILITY
PROJECT
PROJECT NAME: MULTI PURPOSE FACILITY
DESCRIPTIONs
GYMNASIUM TYPE FACILITY. WOOD FLOORS. BASKETBALL.
DACKBOARDS, BLEACHERS, OFFICES, LOCKER ROOMS
PROJECT LOCATIONs
RESPONSIBLE AOENCY
EAsT NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION:
PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
OROANIZATION~ ADMIN.
unit of Measurement: MULTI PURPOSE
FACILITY
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 1.3
Size of This Project: ~
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Constructio~
Other Total
Prior
1989-90
· Forecast
1990-91
. Budget Year
· ..,'.1~91-92
1992-93
~!~.. /'.1993-94
17 1276
7 1300
1994-95
Future
Total 17 1276
7 1300
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
139.400
6,000
127.400
40 , 3'33
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
_ ~o
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: JOGGING TRAILS PROJECT # 706
PROJECT NAME: JOGGING TRAILS
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 3 MILES OF JOGGING TRAILS - UNPAVED
PROJECT LOCATION: 3, 1, 11 GOLDEN GATE, ~ORT~ NAPLES, IMMOKALEE (#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSION~ ~UBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION= ADMINISTRATION
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: MILES
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 6.1
Size of This Project: $
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
· Budget Year
' 1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
'1994-95
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructioq ~and construction
othe~ Tota~
3 22 25
3 22 25
3 22 25
Future
Total 9 66 75
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rst Year of Impact
COst per Unit
Nt~ber of Units
Oross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
N/A
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMAry FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= REGIONAL PARK LAND
PROJECT NAMEr REGIONAL PARK LAND
DESCRIPTIONs 200 (+/-) ACRES OF REGIONAL PARK LAND
PROJECT LOCATION= ~ RURAL ESTAT~
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT ~ 70~
RESPONBIBLE AGENCY
DZVZSION= PUBLIC SERVICES
DBPARTHENT~ PARKS & RECREATION
ORGANI2ATION= ~DMINISTRATIO~
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= ~
1991-95 Tot&l Defioleno~t 193.7
SiZe of This ProJeot~ 200
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91.
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
"' ~993-94
. ::,' 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ construotion
20 150
2000
170
2000
Total
20 2150
2170
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Pirst Year of Impact
-Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Loss Ussr Revenue
Net Impact $
N/A ' ,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~aOJECT SUMMAry FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= OLYMPIC SWIMminG POOL
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=
PROJECT
OLYMpiC SWIMMING pool
$0 METER POOL. DECK. DIVING AREA. LOCKER ROOM.
GRANDSTANDS. RESTROOMS. PLAY AREAS
3 GOLDEN GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
DIVISION~ PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT~ PAPAS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION~ ADMINISTRATION
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= OLYMPIC POOL
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ 1.3
size of This Project~ i
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
'1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
gonstruction Lancl construction
30 2170
Other Total
100 2300
Total 30 2170
100 2300
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rst Year of Impact 92/93
Cost per Unit $
Nttmber of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
351,500
60~000 ,
291,500
40 , , 336
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPRQVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJ~CT SUMMARY FORM
TYPI OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ TRACK AND FIELD FACILITY
PROJECT NAMES
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE A~ENCY
DIVISION~ PUBLIC SERVICES
PROJECT # 7Q9,
TRACK AND FIELD FACIbIT¥
FULL SIZE TRACK WIT]{ INFIELD AND BASIC TRACK AND FIELD,.
3 GOLDEN GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
DIP~RTMENT~ PARKS & RECREATION
ORG~NIZATION~ ADMINISTRATION
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
199 -9
~994-95
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Projeot~
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction La:~ constructio~ ~ther
TRACK, AND
FIELD
.... ~.3
Tgtal
5 171 15
Future
Total
5 171 15
191
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 94/95__
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $ 800Q__
Less User Revenue - 0
Net Impact $ 8000
40,, 337
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT S~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= BOAT RAMP
PROJECT NAME: BOAT LANES
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT $ 710
BOAT RAMP - LANES. PARKING 40 SPACES, FISH CLEANING
T~BLE. RESTROOMS. PICNIC AREA. LANDSCAPING. TOT LOT
PROJECT LOCATION=
(#)
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= PUBLIC SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
ORGANIZATION: ADMIN, ,.
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
size of This Project:
LANES
15.8
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
,199<-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Construction
Other
50 14 3 67
41 113 - 766 17
937
32 113 235
32 113 236
32 113 236
6 386
6 386
6 387
Total
187 466 1475
35 2163
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Colt per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Nit Impact
2090
2000
338
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR~{
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITYs COMMUNITY PARK
PROJECT NAMEs COMMUNITY PARK # 7
DESCRIPTION1 COMMUNITY PARK WITH BALLFIELDS. TOT LOTS. COURTS.
LANDSCAPING, FOOTDALL/SOCCER FIELDS
PROJECT LOCATIONs 9 URBAN ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 111
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DZ¥IBZONI
pUBLIC SERVICES
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit o£ Measurementl COMMUNITY PARK
DEP~RTMENT~ p~S & RECREATION 1991-95 Total Deficiency~
ORGANIZATIONs ADMINISTRATION
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land
Construction Other Total
'1990-91
;.BUdget Year
11'1992-93
1993-94
100
100
768
1296
1431
100
30 2194
40 1471
',';' ' 1994-95
:': Future
Total
200 768 2727
70 3765
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Coot per Unit $
Number of Units
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
94/95
131,600
12.000
119,600oUu~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVF24ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SUMKARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK.
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT $ 712
COMMUNITY PARK #8
~o~3NITY pARK WIT~ pALbFIELDS, TOT LOTS, COURTS,
LANDSCAPING. FOOTBALL/SOCCER FIELDS
TO BE DETERMINED
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION=
PUBLIC SERVICES
Unit of Measurement: COMMUNITY PARK
DEP]%RTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION
OR~NI2ATION: ~DMINISTRATION
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Prior
Pre-
Construct~oB Land
construc~$o~ Other Total
1989-90
· Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
993-94
1994-95
.Future
Total
lO0
100
768
1296
1431
200 768 2727
40, . 340
100
30 2194
40 1471
70 3765
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
96/97
~3~,60o
12.000
1~9,600
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
P~rat Year of Impact
Coat pi= Unit
Number of Units
Lisa User Revenue
Net Impact
FACILITY
(years)
POIABLE ~fllEk SYSTEHI
LEVEL OF SERYICE bTAHOLRO: I~516~D/CAPITA }'LUS 21Z IIOli-RESIDENTIAL
POPULATIOII AGO HOD HOD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
FISCAL COUNTY kEOUIRED 'PLANHED AVAILATLE (DEFIC[EtlCY) (COSTI AT
~EAR SE~IICE ARC& 0.00024500 ii: CIP $1,8~3,9~0
91-92 Se~2~ 2t.60 9.50 27.50 5.90 10,820,187
92-V$ 93780 2%00 6.00 ~5.50 12.50 22,92q,L25
~$'94 ~23~ 24.]0 Z5.50 11.20
94-~5 10q675 25.50 4.00 2.9.50 i3.90 25,491,627
95'~6 il0058 27.00 ~.50 12.50 22,~24,125
~L-~7 1i552! 28.]0 39.50 ii.20 20,SqO,Oi&
~7-~B 12~4') ~{.60 ~?.50 9.90 IB,155,907
?{°0(' 1]1785 92.~0 ]{.50 7.20
POPULATIOll H6D HOD "TD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
COUNTY REOUIREB PLAH~4EO AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT
(ERVICE AREA ?qS~CAPITA IH CIP
TIHE PERIOD
PRESE,! 10
9130190
5 YEAR GROWTH
5-YEAR ~UBIO1AL
2#g 5-YR 6ROMTH
10 YEAR TOTAL
10190-9/0,)
7741& 19.00 0 12.90 (7.00{ 112,B37,5i0{
272Z9 6.60 20 27.50 20.90 36,329,i37
104675 25.6(, 28 ~9.50 13.90 25,49i,627
271!0 5.70
121785 32.30 36 39.50 7.20
!
IOEFINITIOII ~
Treatflnt plant ¢~p{cit¥ plus ~vailible thirty (]01
day potable ~ater ~torage plus {quifer ~turage and
recoter¥ systets,
40 ,; 3'41
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SU]~Y FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION= 4&5
(~)
PROJECT # 801
20" WATER MAIN RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD - COUNTY BARN
BO~D TO us 41
6560 L.F. oF 20" WATER MAIN
EAST NAPb~S; SOUTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ~7~ILITIES
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATIONs WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements N;A
1991-95 Total Deficiency: N/%
Size of This Projects ~/A
Prior
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
constr~ction Land co~s~uctio~
Other Tota~
1989-90
· Forecast
56 392 448
1990-91
Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
Total 56 392 448
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact ~ 90/9~
Cost per Unit $ .493
Number of Units , 6560
Gross Cost $ 3~34
Less User Revenue - 3234
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
gAPITAL IMPROVE~E~{T ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SU~Y FORM
T%~PE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT $ 80~
PROJECT NAME: CARICA ROAD STORAGE TANKS AND PUMP STATION
DESCRIPTION: ~ENOVATION OF EXISTING 5 MG TANK AND CONSTRUCTION OF 1
NEW ~ MGD TAN~ AND REPUMP STATION
PROJECT LOCATION: 1
(~)
NORT~ NAPbES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Construction
~//"/. ". 1989-90
I~:: ' Forecast
!~.~ ~i ' 1991-92
~.~,~.' ..
~!~, 1992-93
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: MGD
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 11.8
Size of This Project: 5.0
Other Total
340 1700 2040
340 1700 2040
XMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Xear of Impact 90/9~
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Less User Revenue -
Nit Xmpact $
1~4377
114377
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREATMENT PLANT
PROJECT
DESCRIPTIONs
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 811
LAND ACQUISITION FOR NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT (PART OF MASTER PLAN PROJECT ~O,
LAND ACOUISITION
NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
REBPONBIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBION~ ~TI, LITIES
DEPARTMENTS ~DMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATIONs WATER
Prior
'>1~ 1989-90
· Forecast
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
size of This Proje=t:
~/A
N/A
FINANCIAL SUI~4ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Constructio~
340
Othe~ Total
340
340
340
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact
Cost,per Unit
GROSS Cost
Less Oser Revenue
Net Xmpact
N/A
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION $¥STE~ PROJECT $ 8~]
PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN - RADIO ROAD - COUNTRYSIDE TO FOXFIBE
DESCRIPTION= 2430 L.F. OF 12" WATER ~
PROJECT LOCATIONs 3 GOLDEN GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONz UTILITIES
DEPLRTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
OR~-NIZATIONZ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Msasttrement~
1991-95 Total Defioienoy:
Size of This ProJeot~
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
!!i 1989-90
· Forecast
Budget Year
· ~ .... 1991_92
Future
Total
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Other Total
17 85 102
17 85 102
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost
ess User
90/9~
.493
2430
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMP~0YEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY,FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 815
16" WATER MAIN - PINE RIDGE ROAD TO AIRPORT ROAD TO
LIVINGSTON ROAD
~80 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
NORTH NAPLES; CENTRAL NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISIONs UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
ORGAI~IZATIONs WAT~ ,,,
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficienoys
Size of This Project:
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
,Forecast
%:i.:.1990-91
i~i..Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
..Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construction other
45
406
Tota~
45
406
Total 45 406 451
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
LOll User Revenue -
Net Impact $
'90/91 ,493
Z603
2603
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMF.%RY.FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 815
PROJECT NAME: ~0" WATER MAIN - GOODLETTE ROAD EXTENSION - PINE RIDGE
ROAD TO CARICA ROAD,STORAGE TANK
DESCRIPTION= 10.500 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE ]%OENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
OROANI=ATXON: WATER
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit o~ Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUM2~ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Copstruotio_~
112
other Total
627
112
627
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total 112 627 739
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Colt per Unit
Number of Units
Oroll Cost
Loss User Revenue
Net Impact
90/9~
,4~
,~05~0 5206
~206
ESTI~IATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
gAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMA~¥,,FORM
TYPB OP PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT
PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN - IMMOKALEE ROAD TO WILLOUGHBY
DESCRIPTION: 2000 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ , NORT~ ~APLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ~roJeot:
Prior
1989-90
·Forecast
:?,.~iBu~get Year
· 1991-92
1992-93
'r~ :. 1993--94
J: 1994-95
?,. Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~onstruction Land Co~strUct~o~
Other Total
13 69 82
N/A
N/A
N/A
.T0tal
13 69 82
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FirSt Year of Impact 90/9~
Cost per Unit $ .49~
Nu~mr o£ Unite
GrOII COSt $ 956
Leis Ullr Revenue - 986
~ot Impact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
¢~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN - IMMOKALEE ROAD - WILLOUGHBY ACRES
TO LIVINGSTON ROAD EXTENSION
3500 L,F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
1 NORTH NA?L~S .
(#) (planning District Name)
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DZVISIONz ~TILITIES
DEP~RTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
Prior
PROJECT # 82Q
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements . , N/A
1991-95 Total Deficiency= N/A
Size of This Project: N/A
0thor Total
FINANCIAL SmY ($ IN TaOUSANDS)
Pta-
Construction L~n4 CoDstr~ct~o~
34 169 203
1994-95
Future
Total 34 169 203
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 90/91
Cost par Unit
Numbar of Units
Lass User Revenue - 1725
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME= ~2" WATER MAIN - ON CR 95~ FROM MANATEE,,,ROAD To CR 952
DESCRIPTION: 23.700 L.F.,.OF 12" WATER MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION: 6 ~A~CO
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI~ISION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORG;~NIZATION: WAT~
Prior
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
' 1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
::1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construct~o~
PROJECT # 823
N/A
N/A
N/A
other Total
73 808 881
Total 73 808 881
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cos% per Unit $
Number of Units
Cross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
90/91
.4~
2370Q
11684
11684
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
.... 20,
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SU~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM. PROJECT # 824
PROJECT NAME~ 12" WATER MAIN - CR 951 TO CAPRI STORAGE TANK
DESCRIPTION~ ~500 L.¥. OF ~2" WATER MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION~ ~ MA~Q
(#) (Planning District Name)
~SPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ UTILITIES
DEP~tRTMENT, ADMINISTRATION
ORG~NIZATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This ProJect~
N/A
N/A
N/A
Your
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Cons~ruction
Other Total
17 187 204
'." "-: Total
17 187 204
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Nttmber of Units
Less User Revenue
NOt Impact
9o/91
47~Q
47~0 ,,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
.. 20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT BUMPY FOR]4
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMI$$I,.0N SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=,
PROJECT $ 825
20" WATER M~.IN RATTLESNAKE BAMMOCK ROAD - LELY RESORT
F0 CO.UNTY BARN, ROAD
13.200 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN
SOUT~ NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
~EBPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DMSION= UTILITIES
D~PARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WATER
Prior
1989-90
iForecast
1990-91
Budget Year
.1992-93
;1993-94
1994-95
Future
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction La~4 Constr~ctio~
Other Total
48 542 590
81 - 187
N/A
N/A
N/A
268
129 729 858
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
.493
13200
6508
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEME~ ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUKMARy FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME: 12" WATER MAIN 6TH STREET - 91ST AVENUE 111TH AVENUE
DESCRIPTION= ~600 b.~. OF 12" WATER M~IN
PROJECT LOCATION= i NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 826
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION=
UTILITIES
Unit of Measurement:
' D~PARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
ORGANIZATION= WATER
size of This Project=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~1990-91
~ 'Budget Year
i'?~ 1.991-92
'1992-93
['1:993-94
'('" 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructio~ Land Construction
ot~e~ Tota~
20 225 245
N;A
N;A
N;A
Total 20 225 245
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
~ross Cost $
Lese User Revenue -
Net Impact $
9,0/91
3254
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
:~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUM]4AR~ FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 82~
~6" WATER MAIN GULFSHORE DRIVE - VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD .
% U.S. 41 TO 111TH STREET IN NAPLES PARK
13.200 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Projects
N;A
N/A
N;A
Prior
.1989-90
,Forecast
990-91
!'.i ~ Budget Year
1991-92
...:,," 1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construction
Other Total
54 595 649
274 - 852 1126
Total 328 1447 1775
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
P~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
lq%umber of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
,,91/92
,493
13200
~5os
6208
~oo~ i0 PA,~ 3'54
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CR~ITAL IMPROVEmeNT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREA~ENT PI~T
PROJECT NAME: NORT~ COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
DESCRIPTION: $ MGD MEMBRANE SOFTENING PLANT
PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 829
RZSPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI~ISION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
Budget Year
1992-93
~1993-94
1994-95
:l~J. ture
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Lan4 constructio~
other Total
MGD
11.8
8.0
757 8328 9085
1243 3172 4415
Total 2000 11500 13500
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGET8 ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Ntu~ber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
$ 73~900
- , 732900
(years)
C~pITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR~
TYPE OP PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME~
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION: ...~
(#)
PROJECT # 831
24" WATER MAIN - VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO IMMOKALEE ROAD
(MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 21~)
10560 L.F. OF 24" WATER ~AIN
RURAL ESTATES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ~TILITIES
D~PARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORG;LNIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N/A
~/A
1989-90
.Forecast
'i Budget Year
199Z-93
:? !993-94
. FutUre
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Con0tru~tion Lan~ Constructio~
148 744 892
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
Total 148
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FArst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Nun.bmr of Units
744
10560
5~Q6
892
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUHMARY FO~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT N~ME ~
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 832
24" WATER MAIN - IM~OKALEE ROAD - CR..951 TO WOODLANDS
PUD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 214]
7920 L.F. OF 24" WATER MA~N
8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
P~BPONaIBLE AGENCY
DMSION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGLNI2ATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This ProJect~
N/A
N/A
N/A
:~ Prior
~;;;,,:~ 1989-90
',[: '. Forecast
Budget Year
1992-93
"~1993-94
.
'1994-95
:Future
FIN~/qCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction ~an~ c0~s~r~cti0~
112
- 558
Other Total
670
Total 112 558 670
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPEPJ~TING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Ntuaber of Units
~ross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
7920
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20,
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOP~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT N~ME~
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATIONs
PROJECT
20" WATER MAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD - WOODLANDS PUD TO OUAIL
CREEK pUD (M~STER PLAN PROJECT NO. 212}
$~80 b,F...OF ~0" WATER MAIN
8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RZSPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
ORG]%NXZATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeot~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
'1990-91
i Budget Year
"'~. 1991-92
~.. '~ 1992-93
· '."'199¢-95
':.:: Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co2s~ruction Lan4 ~onstruction
Other Total
62 - 308 370
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total 62 308 370
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year of Impact
Cost pmr Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less ~ser Revenue
Not Impact
91/92
.5280
260~
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROYEMEI~ ELEMEI~T
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 834
16" WATER MAIN OUAIL CR~K PUD - IMMOKALEE ROAD,TO WATER
TANK (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 211~
7920 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: W~TER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Projects
Yea=
Prior
1989-90
:,.:" Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUM~mY ($ IN TaOUSA~DS)
Pre-
constructio~ Lan4 construction
75 " 375
ot~e~ Total
450
N/A
N/A
Total 75 375 450
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Xum.ber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
9~/92
.493
7920
3905
3905
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TI~SMISSION SYST~
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=
(~)
PROJECT $ 835
20" WATER MAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD - OUAIL CREEK PUD TO OAKS
BLVD. [MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 202)
~640 L-F. OF 20" WATER MAIN
RURAL ESTATES/CORKSCREW
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION% ~TILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N/A
N/A
N/A
· Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
:.':"1991-92
:..":.' 1999-93
~::', i. 1993-94
"1994-95
,: Future
FINANCIAL SUM14ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 Cons~ruc~o~
25 - 158
183
Total 25 158 183
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
:'Coat per Unit
Number o£ Units
'Gross Cost
Leaa User Revenue
Hot Zmpact
9~/92 ,
2640
1302
~302
360
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(Years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT $ $$6
20" WATER MAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD - OAKS BLVD. TO LIVINGSTON
ROAD EXT. [MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 184)
5280 L.F. oF 20" WATER MA~N
8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
REflPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSZON: ~TILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
Prior
1989-90
'-~: Forecast
~/, B~dget Year
- 1991-92
(- '. 1992-93
. i993-94
1994-95
,.Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construct~o~
46 - 317
N/A
N/A
N/A
Othgr Total
363
Total 46 317 363
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Nttmber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Her Xmpact
91/92
5280
~60~
~o3
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FOPd4
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION: ~
(#)
RESPOI~SIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT= ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
"1992-93
'1993-94
1994-95
FUture
PROJECT $ 837
16" WATER MAIN LIVINGSTON ROAD EXT. - IMMOKALEE ROAD TO
OLD 41 (MASTER PLAN ~ROJECT NO. 169,170,171,255)
23,600 L.¥. OF 16" WATER MAIN
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: N/A
1991-95 Total Defioiency= N/A
Size of This Project: ~/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUS~DS)
Pre-
~onstructto~ Land Co~st~uCtion Other Total
101 1116 1217.
':':' TOtal
101 1116 1217,
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
.493
23600
NOTE: Part of Livingstons00~Rd.=~'M~'~';£ 362
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ~D~MENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 838
PROJECT NAME: 1.5 MS STO~AGE TANK AND PUMP STATION - US 41 & OLD 41
DESCRIPTION: WATER STORAGE TANK
PROJECT LOCATION: i NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RISPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT= ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WAT~
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= MGD
1991-95 Total Deficiency= 11.8
Size of This Project= 1.5
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
':1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
· 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
125
1210
Othe~ T0tal
125
1210
Total 125 1210 1335
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 92/93
Cost per unit $
Number og Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact
6~77
62877
363
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
G~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ~J~
Second CIE Update (Spr.Lng 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME =
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION~
PROJECT $ 839
16" WATER MAIN OLD 41 - LIVINGSTON ROAD TO US 41/OLD 41
~LEVATED STORAGE TANK (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 167~
~800 L,F. OF ~6" WATER MAIN
1 ~0RTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSION= UTILITIES
D~PARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= W~TER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficienc~
Size of This ProJsot:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
i .;,>, Budget Year
: .1991-92
1992-93
.: :'~ 1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN %~OUS~NDS)
Pre-
constructio~ Lan~ Construotf0~
20 - 100
otheN Total
N;A
N;A
N/A
120
Total 20 100 120
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
PirSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Nt~er of Units
Gross Cost $
Leis User Revenue -
Net Xmpaot $
udU~
91/se
.493
1800
887
8~7
40,,: 364
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ]~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION FACILITY
PROJECT NAME=
DEB~RIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION= ~&8
PROJECT # $40
16" WATER MAIN PINE RIDGE ROAD - LIVINGSTON ROAD TO
VINEYARDS PUD (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NOS. 302.309)
7920 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
CENTRAL NAPLES;R~/RAL ESTATES
(Planning District Name)
RRBRON8IBLR AGENCY
DZ~/HIONI UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Moasuremsnt~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeot=
N!A
N!A
N!A
Prior
1989-90
· Forecast
i. :!!i. 9 0-91
:.~.?Budget Year
"1991-92
,?~'1992-93
1993__94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUS]%NDS)
Pre-
Construct~o~ Lan~ Co~structio~
7O
375
Other Total
7O
375
Total 70 375 445
IMPaCT ON FUTURE OPER~TIN~ BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
.,4~
79~0
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT E~EMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM~Y FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
1~" WATER MAIN DAVIS BLVD. - FOXFIRE PUD TO GL~DES WATER
TREATMENT PLAN (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 417)
6450 b,F. OF 16" WATER MAIN
4 PAST N~PL$$
(#) (Planning District Name)
REBPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ~TILITIES
D~PARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
OROANIZATION: W~T~R
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioiency:
~i~e of This Project:
N!A
~IA
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~0-91
et Year
1'991_92
1992-93
'<1993-94
'i'! i: 1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
¢onstructio~ Land ConstrBct~o~
55
304
othe~ ~tal
304
Total 55 304 359
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Not Impact
,493
64~0
. ~ ~U ,~A~£ ODD
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR)S
TYPm OF PUBLIC FACILITYz WATER TRANSMISSIOn{ SYSTEM PROJECT ~ 842
PROJECT NAME~ 5 MS GROUND STORAGE TANKS mid PUMPING FACILITIES AT
COLLIER DRI {MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. GTS-4. p$-$)
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION= 4
(#)
~ST NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DXVIBXONz UTILITIES
DBPARTMENTz ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATIONZ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement= MGD
1991-95 Total Deficiency= 11.8
Size of This ProJect~ 5.0
Prior
· 1989-90
:!;'~ Forecast
:i' ',.', 1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
,1993-94
1994-95
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Other Total
123 1348 1471
Total
123 1348 1471
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number cf Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/}3
87377
87377
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROYEMEN? ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT # 843
PROJECT NAME
DESCRIPTION=
12" WATER MAIN AT PINE RIDGE ROAD -
J & ¢ INDUSTRIAL PARK
8000 L.F, OF 12" WATER MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION=
1
(~)
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: W~T~
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project:
Prior
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land construction
105
Other
To~a~
105
N/A
N/A
N/A
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
'Budget Year
,:1991-92
1992-93
;,~ '~ 1993-94
;%~ :~ ".
~'i.':/ 1994-95
i!:' ture
655
655
~.. Total
105 655 760
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
·roee Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
9o/91
.493
8000
3944
~944
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOP~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME=
ZQ" WATER MAIN AT PINE RIDGE ROAD
US 41 TO J & C INDUSTRIAL PAP~
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=
2800 L.F, OF 20" WATER MAIN
(~)
WORTH NAPLES.
(Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 844
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSZON~ UTILITIES
D~P~TMENTz ADMINISTRATION
O~G~A~I2ATION~ W~TE~
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficieno~=
Size of This ProJeot~
Prior
1989-90
'Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
<.1991-92
1992-93
.~::':.1993-94
· '. 1994-95
"Future
FINANCIAL SUMNARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction LaA!l Construction Other
3o
350
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
350
Total
30 350 380
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units ,.
Gross Coat
Less User Revenue - ,
Nit Xmpact $
~o/91
2800
;3~o
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UMMA~ FOP~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM. _ PROJECT # 84~
PROJECT NAMEs 1~" WATER MAIN AT US 41 - V~IDERBILT BEACH ROAD ,TO ,,
PELICAN BAY ENTRANCE (MASTER PLAN PROJECT ~O. 161~
6000 L.¥. OF 12" WATER ~AIN
NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATIQN
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
~Forecast
:~ :Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
.1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUI4/4ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction La~4. .constructio~
19
205
N/A
N/A
N/A
0theF Total
19
205
Total
19 205 224
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Plrst Year of Impact
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
74/95
.4?3
6000
$ 2958
- 27.~,8
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 847
20" WATER.MAIN AT IMMOKALEE ROAD - AIRPORT ROAD
TO US 41 (MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 175)
~Q560 L,F, OF 20" WATER MAIN
NORT~ ~APb~S
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ UTILITIES
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
OROANIZATIONI WATER
Size of This Projects
Prior
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Constructlo~ ~an~ Construction
Other Total
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
74 - 633
1993-94
Future
7O7
~/A
N/A
N/A
Total 74 633 707
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
.493
~o56o
5206
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
C~PITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION~
PROJECT # ~45
12" WATER MAIN AT US 41 - PELICAN BAY ENTRANCE TO PINE
RIDGE ROAD (WATER ~STER PLAN NO. 191]
8300 L.F. OF 12" WATER MAIN
I NORT~ NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTI ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
N!A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
'1993-94
Future
FINANCIAL SUHMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 Construction
26
283
26
283
Total 26 283 309
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 95/96
Cost per Unit
N~m~er of units 8300
Gross Cost $ 4092
LeSS User Revenue - 409~ ,.
Net Impact $
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL XMPROYEMENT EDEMENT
Second CIE update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOJtM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: RAW WATER WELLFIELD
PROJECT N]%ME~ GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD EXPANSION
(MASTER PLAN. PROJECT NO, SRW-2)
ADDITION OF 8 TO 12 NEW WELLS
,8 RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION=
PROJECT
AGENCY
UTILITIES
ADMINISTRATION
OR~LNXZATION~ WATER ,,,
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioienoy~
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
i~:',:1990.91
· Budget Year
1991-92
"' 1992-93
;::'. 1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construct!o~ Lan~ Construction
Other Total
N/A
N;A
N/A
140 1535 1675
This project accelerated in place of #828 (Coral Reef)
Total 140 1535 1675
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Number of Units
Lees User l~evenue
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
C~PITAL IHPROVEHENT..~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FO~
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITYI RAW WATER BOOSTER STATION
PROJECT NAME~ ~AW WATER BOOSTER STATION
DEBCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION~
PROJECT
COUNTY~WIDE
(Planning District Name)
REBPONSIBLE ~GENCY
DIVIBION~ UTILITIES
DEPARTF~ENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZ~TION~ WATER
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Year
~ 1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
r1994--95
I~PACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Defioienoy~
Sims of This ProJsot~
N;A
N/A
N;A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 Construction
Other Total
320 1300 1620
-'.Future
Total 320 13o0 1620
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Plrst Year of Impact
N~er of Units
Less User Revenue
Net Zmpaot
90/91 .,
$ 7705~ .
- 77052
,.
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVE~. ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT 8UMMJ%RY FOR){
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PRO~ECT NAME: 20" WATER MAIN ON G00DLETT~ FRANK ROAD EXTENSION
DESCRIPTION: ~0560 L.F.
PROJECT # 852
PROJECT LOCATIONI. 1
(~)
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
REBPONSIBLE AGENCY
DMSXON: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGAMIZATION: ~TSR
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N;A
N;A
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
.Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construct!c2
other ~otal
116 - 580 696
Total 116 580 696
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
F~rst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
l~-her of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
lO5~Q
5~o6
5206
~tJ"-~ d iD
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMEI~T ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUI~ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WATER TRANSMISSIO~ SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME= PALM DRIVE/US 41 16" LOOP ¥IAT~R MAIN
DESCStZPTION= 11420 L,~,. OF 16" WATER MAI~
PROJECT LOCATION= .... 4 EAST NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 85~
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ UTILITIES
DEP~RTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGI%NIZATION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
~I/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Other Total
112 575 687
Total 112 575 687
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
PirS~ Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Met xnpact $
BO0~
91/9~
.493
11450
5645
$64~ .....
3'76
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARy FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ W_~TER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PRO~ECT
DESCRIPTION ~
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 854
20" WATER MAIN - US 41 NQBT~
8000 L.F. OF 20" WATER MAIN FROM IMMOKALEE TQ
WIGGINS PASS RD.
1 NORT~ NAPLES ,
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
D~PARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N;A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1992-94
1994-95
Futura
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construc~0~
100
-. 500
Other Total
600
Total 100 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Less User Revenue
Net Xmpaot
~/92
$ ,49~
$ )~44
- .3944
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUK~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME~
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION~, 3
(~)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBION~ UTILITIES
DEP~RTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ WATER
PROJECT
1~" WATER MAIN ON ~ADIO ROAD BETWEEN COMMERCIAL DRIVE
~ND D~VIS BLVD.
~0 L,F. OF 12" WATER MAIN IN CONJUNCTION WIT~
CIE 15 & ~6.
GOLDEN GATE
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~
Size of This ProJsct~
N;A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
160 - 822
other Total
982
Total 160 822 982
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
(3ross Cost
Less User Revenue
91/92
.4~)
21~20
10410
~o4~o ,,
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARy FORM
TYPE OP PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION ~AIN
PROJECT NP/4E ~
DESCRIPTION =
PROJECT # 856
16" WATER MAIN - LIVINGSTON ROAD TO WYNDEMERE
$000 L.F. oF %6" WATER MAIN FROM PINE RIDGE RD~
TO WY~DEMERE
PROJECT LOCATION: 3
(#)
G0bDEN GAT~
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DZVISZON: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZ~TION~ WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N;A
N/A
N/%
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Cgnstruction La~d Construction
80
- 400
Other Tote%
480
Total 80 400 480
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Pirst Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
9000
3944
3944
4U:: :3TY
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEHENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~OJECT SUMMARY ~ORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 857
~6" WATER MAIN ON SANTA B~RBARA MAIN FROM DAVIS BLVD,
TO RADIO ROAD
5280 L.F. OF WATER MAIN
3 GOLDEN GATE
(#) (Planning District Name)
RRNPONSXBLR AGENCY
DIVXBIONz UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
F/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land constructio~
57
264
57
264
Total 57 264 321
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
9~/93
.493
52s~
~603
2603
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION: ..,~
PROJECT # 858
36" WATER MAIN FROM DAVIS BIND. TO RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK
ROAD ON CR
15840 L.F. OF WATER MAIN
SQUTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVI$ION~ UTILITIES
DBPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORG]ENIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ N/A
1991-95 Total Deficiency~ N/A
Size of This Project= N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
¢~struction Land Constructio~
380
2196
Other Total
380
2196
Total 380 2196 2576
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Groom Cost
LoBS User Revenue
Ne2 Impact
92/9~
$ .947
15840
$ ~ooo
- 15000
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPIT~L IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE up, ate ~#Drina 1990}
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREATMENT PI,~NT PROJECT # 859
PROJECT N]~ME~ ~ORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
DESCRIPTION: ADD 4 MGD CAPACITy
PROJECT LOCATION~ $ RURAL ESTATES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORO~]fIZATION: WATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: MGD
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 11.8
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
800
4o00
Other Total
8OO
4000
Total 800 4000 4800
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
COOt per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Lees Ueer Revenue
Net Xmpaot
4
360000
2600oo
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN~ ~bEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMA~X FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: pOTABLE WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT N;d4E:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT # $60
AQUIFER STO~AGE & ~ECOVER¥
AOUIFER STORAGE OF Up TO 4 ~GD FOR PEAK SEASON, AS
pOSSIBLE - NORTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT. EXISTING
WTP, AND/OR MANATEE
PROJECT LOCATION:
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ UTILITIES
D~PARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ WATER
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~ ~GD
1991-95 Total Deficiency: 11.8
Size of This ProJect~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARy ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Cons~F~ct~o~ Land Construction
Other Total
150 350 5O0
- 350
150
500
100 350 450
Total 400 1050 1450
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Her Inpact
9~/92
UNKNOWN
4-~
- UNKNOWN
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
· '.:~.,.,'~,-~ .'.:~ ............... · ........ ~.r~.~_,~ ...... ~.~.~,. ............. ~'.".
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO FY91-95 DEFICIENCY
SEMER TREATMENT PLANT: SOUTH COUNTY
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: IOOI6PDICAPITA PLUS 21Z NON-RESIDENTIAL
POPUCATION ~GD ~6D ~60 SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY} (COST} AT
YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000~2! IN CIP $2,754,144
88-89 50028 6.1 $.3 12.B) (7,711,605J
8~'~0 63062 7.6 3.$ (4.$) (11,842,8HJ
~0-9! 6706~ 8.1 4.7 B.0 (0A) (275,4~4)
91'92 7110V 8.6 e.o (0.6) (1,652,48&)
{2-{3 75156 ~.~ 4.0 i2.0 2.9 7,{87,0i8
{3-{4 79209 9.6 12.0 2.4
{4-95 8~25& iO.l 12.0 i.{ 5,252,874
{5'9& 87295 lO.& 12.0 1.4 3,855,802
{6-97 91274 li.O 12.0 i.D 2,754,144
{7'{8 95280 ii.5 12.0 0.$ 1,377,072
~B'99 9~290 iLO 12.0 0.0
99'00 iD~299 12.5 i2.0 i0.5{ (i,377,072{
Tine PERIOD
POPULATXOH K6D H6D ~6D SURPLUS/ VAL~ OR
COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY] (COST} AT
SERVICE AREA i2ilCAPITA IN CIP S2,754,i44
PRESENT TO
91~01~0
t YEAR 6ROIITH
lOISO-W95
~-YEAR SUBTOTAL
211D ~-YR 6RONTH
~0 YEAR TOTAL
65062 7.6 0.0 $.~ (4.$) (il,842,81{{
20194 2.5 8.7 8.? 6.2 17,075,69~
83256 10.1 6.7 i2.O 1.9 $,232,874
20043 2.4 0.0 0.0 (2.4) (6,60~,~46{
10~299 12.5 8.7 12.0 (0.51 (1,377,0721
40 ,; 384
RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO FY91-95
DEFICIENCY
FISCAL
YEAR
68-89
90o9!
91o92
92°93
93°94
94-93
13-96
~8-99
TII~ PERIOD
SEYER TREATMENT PLAN1: NORTH COUNTY
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDI JOOISPDIC~PITA PLUS 2i.lT NON'RESIDENTIAL
POPULATION MSD K6D MGD SURPLUS/ VALUE DR
COUNTY REOUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT
SERVICE AREA 0.000~2! IN CIP $2,754,t44
27372 3.3 2.5 (0.61 (2,203,315)
29279 3.5 2.0 4.5 l.O 2,754,144
$~020 4.0 4.5 0.5 1,377,072
35291 4.3 4.5 0.2 550,82~
37561 .~'IQ 2.0 6.5 - 2.0 5,508,286
3~835 4.8 ~.5 i.7 4,A82,045
42105 5.1 A.5 1.4 ~,655,802
445~0 5.4 ~o5 l.l ~,~29,558
4&Al7 5.& &.5 0.9 2~478,7~0
4687] 5,9 &.5 O.& 1,652,48&
51129 6.2 6.5 0.3 82&,245
53386 6,5 6.5 0.0 0
POPULATION MGD MGD MGD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR
COUNTY REOUIRED PLANNED A?AILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT
SE,qVICE AREA i2I/CAPITA IN LIP S2,754,144
~ESEXTTO
3YEAIt 6ROYTH
IOIgO,-TIT5
SUBTOTAL
2Il 5-YIt
TEAR TOT~
iOl~O~lO0
29279 3.5 2.0 4.5 1.0 2J54d44
12826 1.6 2.0 2.0 0.4 1,101,658
42Z05 5.t 4.0 6.5 1.4 $,955,B02
tint 1.4 0,0 0.0 (1.41 {3,B55,802)
5:~$86 6.5 4.0 6.5 0.0 0
CAPITAL IHPROYEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SU~¥ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=
PROJECT # 901
EXPANSION OF NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATE~ FACILITY
AND EFFLUENT DISPOSA~
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
1 NORT~ NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RZBPONSlBLE AGENCY
DIVIBIONz ~TILITIES
D~P~TMENT= ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FIN]~NCIAL SUKMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ ¢9~struct~o~
500 5195
Other
MGD
N/A
Total 500 5195 5695
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Oross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
I~00~
90/9~
643/~G
9~6635
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
Total
5695
CAPITAL IHPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
· Y~I OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 902
PROJECT N~/~E~ EAST AND SOUTH NAPLES SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYST~
DESCRIPTION~
PRO~ECT LOCATIONI 2. 4. 5
(#)
CENTRAL NAPLES: EAST NAPLES; SOUTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
DMSXON: UTILITIES
D~PARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORG~NI~ATION~ W~STEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1992-95 Total Defioiencyt N/A
Size of This ProJsot~ ~/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
'1990-91
:,'.Budget Year
~991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINaNCIaL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land C~onstruction Other
1764
20522
1764
20522*
'* Does not include expected grant of $4,927,000
Total 1764 20522 22286
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Y.,~Is User Revenue
Net Impaot
90/91
$ 1.68 L.F.
:}61)OOQ
$ 620650
- ~Q6,5o
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
ZQ
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN~ ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUMMARY FOP~
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT # 904
PROJECT NAME= SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION=
SOUTH NAPLE~
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATIONs W~STEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~struction Lan4 const~uction
1002 500 11006
Other
Tota~
12508
Total
1002 500 11006
MGD
6.8
4,7
IHPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Lifo User Revenue
lflt: Tn, pact
90/91
4~6/MG
1244100
1244100
40,:-...388'
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
12508
CAPITAL I~P~OVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUM~ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: S~WSR TREATMENT PLANT AND
$~ER COLLECTION SYSTEM
PROJECT $ 90!
PROJECT NAME: SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER PUMP STATION T~ANSMISSION
~IAINS AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION: 2, 4 & 5
(#)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONI UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTI ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WASTEWATER
CENTRAL NAPLES; EAST NAPLES; SOUTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construotlo~
1133 500 18116
other
Total
19749
Total
1133 500 18116
19749
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
90/91
$ 1.68/F~, PIPE
89040
$ ~5OQQ0
- 150000
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(Years)
CAPITAL IMPROV~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPO OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT # 908
PROJECT ITAME, 8" FORCE MAIN - PUMP STATION NO.15 TO PUMP STATION NO.20
DESCRIPTION: 10.$00 L.F. OF 8" FORCE MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION= 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
~BPONBZBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
D~P;tRTM~TI ADMINISTRATION
ORQ~NIZATION= WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N/A
N/A
Yea=
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budqet Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUI~(ARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~o~s~ruction Lan4 Construction
140
712
Other Total
140
712
Total 140 712 852
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Coot per Unit
If~nber of Units
Lall User Revenue
Nat Impact
1.68 Der L.F.
10800
18144
18144
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8UKMARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT
PROJECT NAME~ 12" FORCE MAIN PUMP STATION NO.19 TO PUMP STATION No.20
DBHCRIPTION: 11.300 L.F. OF FORCE MAIN
PROJECT LOCATION: ~ SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBION~ UTILITIES
DEPA~tTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORG~NI2ATION~ WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
2992-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This ProJeot~
~/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91 220
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
Total 220
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land construction
1177
Other ?eta1
220
1177
1177
1397
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rst Year of Impact
Colt per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Xmpaot
92/93
$ ~,68 Der L.F,
11300
$ 18984
- 18984
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
gA~ITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMNARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ PUMP STATION
PROJECT NAME% DAVIS BOULEVARD PUMP STATION NO. 11
DESCRIPTION% MASTER PUMP STATION
PROJECT LOCATIONS 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 911
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION% UTILITIES
DIPARTMENT% ADMINISTRATION
ORG]%NIZATION~ WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement%
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~
Size of This Project%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~gnstruction Land Construction
100
500
100
500
Future
Total 100 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
N~er of Units
Groes Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
77~1
1
7721
7721
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ~LEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUNNY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: pUMP STATION
PROJECT NAME: DAVIS BOULEVARD PUMP STATION NO. 14
DESCRIPTION: F~ASTER PUMP STATION
PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 913
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DITISION: UTILITIES
DEPARTHENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORG;~NIZATION: W~STEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
N;A
N;A
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
100
500
Other T0ta~
100
500
Total 100 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 92/93
Cost per Unit $ 77~
Nu~er of Units ~
QrOll Cost $ 772~
Lell User Revenue - 77~%
Net Impact $
407:. 393
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT suMKAR~ FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAMEI
DESCRIPTIONI
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 914
20" FORCE MAIN. CR-951/U$ 41 pUMP STATION No. 18 TO PUMP
STATION No. 1
11.400 L,F. OF S0" FORC~ ~AI~
sOUTH ~APLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIFISIONI UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTI ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of MeasurementI
1991-95 Total Deficienoy~
Size of This ProJect~
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~o~s~uct~o~ LaRd C0nstructio~
Other Total
100 -' 100
502 502
Total 100 502 602
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
First Year GE,Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Lees User Revenue
92/9~
1.68 per ~.F.
11400
19152
19152
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMNARY FORM
TYPB OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ PUMP STATION
PROJECT N~ME~ DAVIS BOULEVARD PU~p STATION ~, ~8
DESCRIPTIONI MASTER PUMP STATION
PROJECT LOCATIONI 9 $O~ ~PLE$
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 915
R~SPONBIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBION~ UTILITIES
DEP~RTMENT~ ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATIONI WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
~/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budqet Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINaNCIaL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land construction
100
500
Othe~ Total
100
500
Total 100 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATIN~ BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
772~
77~1
772~
4o , ,39a
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TREATMENT PLANT
PROJECT NAME~
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 916
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
EXPANSION (4MGD~
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION FROM 8MGD TO 12MGD
5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVXBXON~ UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORO~NI2ATION~ WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project:
MGD
6.8
4,0
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
C0nstruct~o~ Land Construction
1800
8876
Other
1800
8876
Total 1800 8876 10676
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
FLret Year of Impact 92/9)
Cost per Unit $
~,u~er of Units
Oross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
~2050
22050
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMAR~ FOR~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TREATMENT PLANT
PROJECT NAME:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DEP~/~TMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WASTEWAT~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
PROJECT # 917
NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
EXPANSION
DESIGN SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION (COSTS FROM 207
FACILITIES PL~}
1 NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: MGD
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMF~a/~Y ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
construction Land co~structto~ Other TOtal
500 500
2607 2607
Future
Total 500 2607 3107
I~ACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact 92/93
Cost per Unit $
N~mber o£ Units
Gross COSt $ 11025
Less User Revenue - 11025
Net Xmpaot $
40 ,,,i397
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT sUMMARy FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION bINE
PROJECT N]~AE I
DESCRIPTION=
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT # 918
20" FORCE MAIN RATTLeSNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD - CR-951 TO
POLLY AVENUE
11.400 L..F. O¥ 20" FORCE MAIN
5 SOUT~ NAPles
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVXaIONI UTILITIES
D~PARTMENTI ADMINISTRATION
ORa~NIZATION= WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementl
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This Project=
N/A
Year
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land constructi~
100
502
OtheF Total
100
502
Total 100 502 602
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDaETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
·ross Cost
Lomb User Revenue
Net Impact
$ 1,68 Der L.F.
1~400
$ 19152
- 19152
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FQRM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= PUMP STAT~QN PROJECT # 919
PROJECT NAMEs RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD PUMP STATION No. 20
DESCRIPTIONs MASTER PUMP STATION
PROJECT LOCATION= 5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVIBIONs UTILITIES
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION= WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiencys
Size of This Projects
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructio~
100
5OO
Ot~ez
100
5OO
Total 100 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Yeer of Impact
Coot per Unit
Number of Units
Leos User Revenue
Net Impact
92/93
772%
77~1
77~
399
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
~Ap~TAL IMPROYE~ENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SU~Y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION
PROJECT NAME: PUF~ STATION No. 16 - CR-9§I
DESCRIPTION% MASTER PUMP STATION CMANATEE ROAD~
PROJECT LOCATION% ~ SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT $ 920
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DZVIBZONz UTILITIES
DIPARTMENTz SDMINISTRATION
OR~ANIZATIONt WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurementz
1991-95 Total Defioienoyz
Size of This Project:
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
100
5OO
Other Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
lO0
500
Total lO0 500 600
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost par Unit
Nltmbar of Units
Gross Cost
Lass User Revenue
Net Impact
}2/}3
77~
77~1
7721
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (SDring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= SEWER COLLECTION LINE
PROJECT NAME=
DESCRIPTIONI
PROJECT LOCATION=
PROJECT #
12" FORCE MAIN CR-951 - PUMP STATION NO. 16 TO PUMP
STATION No. %$
~0,800 L.F. OF 12" FORCE MAIN
5 SOUTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE A(3ENCY
DIVISION= UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT= ADMINISTRATION
OR(3ANIZATION= WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
N/A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Prior
Pre-
Construction Land
construct~o~ QtheN Total
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
- 321
321
Total
~ost per Unit
F~ret Year of Impact
(3ross Cost $
Less Use~ Revenue
321
321
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
1.68 Der L.F.
10s00
~44
18144
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
SecoNd'CIE 0pdate (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: pUMP STATION
PROJECT NAME% FORTH COUNTY PUMP STATION T~L~METRY SYST~1~
DESCRIPTION% RADIO T~LSMETRY SYSTEM
PROJECT LOCATIONs ~ ~O~TH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION% UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ~DMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION% WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Tot&l Deficiency%
Size of This Project%
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan4 Construction
Other Tota~
5 5O 55
Total 5 50 55
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
F~rIt Year of Impact 90/9~
Colt per Unit $ 15Qo
Nt~er of Units 1
Gross cost $ ]500
~ess User Revenue - 1~00
Ntt Imp&~t $
40o- 402
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(Years)
CAPITAL IHPROVEME~T,,,ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8Ul~y FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: OPERATIONS BUILDING
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT $ 923
NORTH COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - OPERATIONS
DUILDING
DESCRIPTION~
PROJECT LOCATION:
OFFICE AND LABORATORY FOR THE FACILITY PERSONNEL
~O~T~ N~PLE$
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DI¥ISION~ UTILITIES
DBPARTI~ ADMINISTRATION
ORQANIiATION: WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement~
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeot~
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMmArY ($ IN TaOUS~NDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
250 40 290
Total
250 40 290
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Ntuaber of Units
Qross Cost
Less Ueer Revenue
Met Xmpact
90/91
41052
41052
~U :: :~ ~UJ
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
CAPIT~L IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SU~¥ FOR~
TYPR OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION
PROJECT NAME: NORTH CO.UNTY MASTER PUMP STATION No. 1.10
DRBCRZPTZONz
PROJECT # 924
PROJECT LOCATION: 1 ,, NO~T~ NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: UTILITIES
DBPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
2992-95 Total Defioienoy:
Size of This Project:
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY {$ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~structto~ Land co~structlo~
Other Total
98 392 490
Total 98 392 490
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
,First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Not Impaot $
90/9~ .,,
772!
772~
77~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEH~ ~LEMEN~,.
Second CIE Update (spring 1990)
PRoJecT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY= WASTEWATER FACILITIES
PROJECT NAMEs
DESCRIPTIONs
PROJECT
PELICAN BAY IHPROVEHENT DISTRICT
20" FORCE MAIN. 2 PUMP STATIONS - 1.04 & ~.09. 20"
EFFLUENT LINE
PROJECT LOCATION:
(~)
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVXBION~ ~TILITIE$
DEPARTMENTs ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION~ }~
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defioiencys
Size of This ProJeots
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Lan~ Constructio~
450 - 2270
Other Total
2720
Total 450 2270 2720
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impaot
91/9~
1.68 ]Der ~oot
4752Q
95276
95~76
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUM~LARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
PROJECT NAME~ IMMOKALEE ROAD SEWER;EFFLUENT SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION: FORCE MAIN & EFFLUENT LINE FROM REGIONAL WASTEW~TER
TREATMENT PLANT TO OUAIL CREEK PUD
PROJECT LOCATION: % NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONI UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION
ORGANISATIONs WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiencys
Size of This Projects
N/A
~/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
CoDstruction Lan~ Constructio~
200 - 3750
Other Tota~
3950
Total 200 3750 3950
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Nttmber of Units
Gross cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
$ 1.68, per L.F.
$~6,~Q
$ 53520,
- 53220
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
20
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY F0~
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY~ PUMP STATION~
PROJECT ITAMEs MASTER PUMP STATIONS 1,0~ & 1,07
DESCRIPTION~ TWO MASTER PUMP STATIONS ON IMMOKALEE ROAD
PROJECT LOCATIONs 1 NORTH NAPLES
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 9~7
P. ESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONS UTILITIES
D~PARTMENTS ADMINISTRATION
ORGANISATION~ WASTEWATER
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Defiolenoy~
Size of This ProJsct~
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
200 1136 1336
Total 200 1136 1336
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less User Revenue -
Net Impact $
~/9~
1~442
~5442
40-7
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years) -
ChPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8U~Y FOI~M
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TRANSMISSION
PROJECT NAME ~
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION: 1
(*)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION: ~TILITI~S
DEPARTMENTS ~DMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
PROJECT # 928
24" yQRCE MAIN No. 1.06, Q~NG~ BI~OSSOM DRIVE TO No.
1,07, AIRPORT ROAD
AIRPORT ROAD/ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE FORCE MAINS - 20,000
L.F, .
NORTH NAPLES
(Planning District Name)
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Defioienoy:
Size of This Project:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Co~struct~o~
Other Total
N/A
N/A
240 1200 1440
Total 240 1200 1440
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
91/92
$ l~68,pe~
VO00O
$ ~0o
- 3]§Q0
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2O
(years)
RECONCILIATION OF
PROJECTS TO FY91-95
DEFICIENCY
SOLID MAST£
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1.55 TQNSICAPITA
T¥O YEARS LINED CELL CAPACITY [Naples and llmokalee!
POPULATION BEGINNIN6 CAPACITY 2ND YEAR CAPACITY SURPLUS/
FISCAL CO-#IDE CAPACITY REUUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED IDEFICIENCY!
YEAR M£IGHTED AVG. AVAILADLE 1.5500 REOUIRED IN CI? 2ND YEAR LOSS
88-89 17L,59B L,497,904 265,977
89'90 185,765 I,L59,055 287~933
90-91 19~,7B0 1,907,673 305,009
9Z-92 207,B00 ~,602,664 ~22,090
92-93 2~9~812 2~,787 ~0,709
9~-9~ 2~0,B~6 5,606,879 ~57,796
94-95 241,835 5,249,083 374,844
95-% 252,807 4,874,239 391,85A
%'97 265,783 4~482,$BB 408,B64
97-98 274,760 4,075,524 425,878
96-99 285,74& 3,647,646 442,699
99-00 296,916 3,204,747 460,065
287,933
305,009
322 090
340 709
357 796
374 844
39!
408 864
425 876
442 699
460 065
473 867
3,484,800
943,994
1,602,664
~260,574
4,874,239
4,462,368
4,073,~24
3,647,646
3,204,747
2,270,8~6
TI~E PERIOD
POPULATION BEGINNIN6 CAPACITY 2ND YEAR CAPACITY SURPLUS/
CD-NIDE CAPACITY REDUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED (DEFICIENCY)
¥£IGHTEO AV6. AVAILADLE i !.~,TO0 REQUIRED IN CIP 2ND YEAR LOSS
PRESENT TO
9130190
5 YEAR 6ROHTH
t0190-9195
5-YEAR SUBTOTAL
2ND 5-YR 6ROMTH
~0 YEAR TOTAL
J0190-9100
185~765 L,159,055 287~93~ ~05,009 566,]15
56,072 4,090,028 86~912 66,842 3,9&6,274
2~1,835 5~249,083 374,644 391,B5! 4,482,388
54,981 (2,0U,355) 85,221 82,0~6 (2,2]J,572)
296~8~6 3~204,747 460~06~ 473,667 2,270,816
VALUE/
COST AT
$6.00
5,663,966
9,615,986
7,683,446
12,732,472
29,245~432
26,894,326
24,441,145
2!,665,977
J9,229,485
~$,624,896
VALUE/
COS/ AT
$6.001TON
3,396,680
23~497~646
26,8~4,326
(13,269,430)
13,624,896
CAPACITY
ACTUALLY USED
ACTUAL
LOS
PROVIDED
2.0
2.1.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YEAN
88-89
90-91
91-92
(/3-94
94-?5
95-96
96-(;7
97-98
98-99
1999-2000
00-0!
01-02
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
TIME PERIOD
RECONCILZATZON~OF PROJECTS TO FY91-95 DEFICIENCY
LEVEL IX: SENVII~ STdUIIMII 1.55 T01ISKMITA
TEN YEARS Of: IMM LANDs ~ (Naples omi Zuokalfl!
POPULATION POPtMTIOII dills RAY !.~ bid LAND ACRES
CO-NIB[ TEN YEigt I~OUIAEN ACRES ACRES PLANRED
NEI6HTEO AVG. TOTAl. AIOIUN.LY AVAII. A~E II~OUIIi~ IN CIP
STmPLOSI
(O~rlCIENCY)
(10-YE~qS LAND)
VALU~I
COST AT
$20,000
171,596 2,245~774 25.0 379.2 327.5
185,763 2,359,917 27.1 354.2 344.2
196,760 2,470,970 28.7 627.1 360.4
207,800 2,582,178 30.3 598.4 376.6
219,812 2,693,~9 32.1 568.1 392.8
230,836 2,804,065 33.7 536.0 408.9
241,835 2,914,747 35.3 ~02.4 425.1
252,607 3~025,670 36.? 467.1 441.3
263,783 3,137,722 38.5 430.2 457.6
274,760 3,250,303 40.1 391.7 474.0
285,741 3,363,614 41.7 351.7 490.6
2%,816 3,477,654 43.3 310.0 507.2
307,908
330,338
341~518
352,958
364,65?
376,364
366~071
399,761 I
411~873
POPULATION POPULATIOH ACRES RAN LAN8 RAY LANO
CO-#IDE TEN YEAR REOU[R[O ACRES ACRES
#EI6flTE8 AVG. TOTAL AI'IXUALLY AVAILABLE REOUIRE8
300
51.7 1,033,474
310.0 6,200,018
266.7 5,334,258
221.9 4,435,911
175.2 3,~o4,975
127.1 2,541,437
77.3 1,545,289
25.e 515,773
(27.4) (547,873)
(82.3) [1,645,660!
4138.9) (2,777,595)
(197.2) (3J430685]
ACRES SURPLUS/ VALUE/
PLANNED (DEFICIEflCY) COST AT
1N CIP (10 YEARS LAND $20,O001ACRE
PRESENT TO
9130190
5 YEAR GROYTH
10190-9195
5-YEAN SUBTOTAL
2ND 5-YR 6RONTH
185,763 2~357,917 27.1 354.2 344.2
56~072 554,8~0 6.2 148.2 80.9
241,835 2,714,747 35.3 ~02.4 425.1
54,981 562,907 8.0 (192.4) 82.1
300.0 310,0 6,200~018
0.0 67.3 1,345,272
300.0 377.$ 7,545,289
0.0 4274.4) {5,46B,775J
10 YEAR TOTAL
10190-9100 296,916 3;477~654 ! 43.3 !!O.~ :~7.2 0.0 (i~/.zI t~,V43,685)
gAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FOPS.
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL LAND ACOUISITION
DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE LAND ADJACENT TO LANDFILL
PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL F~KA-PALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT
RESPONSI1;LE AGENCY
DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: ~OLID WASTE
ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement:
1991-95 Total Deficiency:
Size of This ProJeot:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN TaOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construct~o~
446
446
446
446
446
446
1784
Othev
ACRES
222.7
300 ACRES
446
446
446
446
446
446
1784
Total
4460
4460
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost par Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Met Xmpact
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
10
(years)
~APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT 8U~Y FOBJ4
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDF~LL PROJECT # 1001
PROJECT NAME: bEACHATE TREATMENT
DESCRIPTION~ TREATMENT FACILITY INCLUDING PLANT AND RETENTION POND
PROJECT LOCATIONs 7 ~0YAL FAKA-PALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT~ SOLID WASTE
ORGANIZATION~ NAPLES LANDFILL
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements
1991-95 Total Deficiency~
Size of This ProJeot~
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
FINANCIAL SUKMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Co~structio~ Land ~0nstruction
50
1425
Other Total
50
1425
N/A
N/A
Total 50 1425 1475
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
BOOK
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
10
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
~ROJECT SUM~iARY FOR}{
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
PROJECT NAME: bANDFILL CELL 6, PHASE II
DESCRIPTION: CQNSTRUCT LINED CELL ~REA
PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
DIVISION:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement=
DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE
1991-95 Total DafioienoyI]~
ORGANIZATION= NAPLES LANDFILL
Size of This Project: 1.036.551
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
~onstruction Land
CoDotructio~ Other Total
Prior
2153
2153
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1993-94
1994-95
Future
599
599
Total
2752
2752
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'First Year of Impact
Cost per unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
4[} 413
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
2.5
(years)
CAPITAL IMprOVEMENT ELEMEN~
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
=YPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID wASTE L~F~FILL
t,;OJECT NAME: ~APLES LANDFILL CELL 6, PHASE III
~;:SCRIPTION~ CONSTRUCT LINED CELL AREA
}AOJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CREEK
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # ~003
~ESPONBIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENTs ~QLID WASTE
Ci~GANIZATION: NAPLES _.~.NDFILL
~ear
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
~990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
].994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurements TONS
1~91-~5 Total Defioienoy~~
Size of This Project: 1,182,213
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Construction
Other Total
1000 1000
1650 1650
Total
2650 2650
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
~umber of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impaot
~00~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ZLEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
pROJECT SUM~4ARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WAST$ LANDFILL
PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELLS 3 & 4 ~[~SQ~
DESCRIPTIONS CLOSE FILLED CELL PER FDER PERMIT
PROJECT LOCATIONS 7 ROYAL FAKA-PALM CR~K
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 1004
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION= ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE
ORGANIZATIONs NAPLES LANDFILL
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement=
1991-95 Total Deficiency=
Size of This Project=
~/A
N!A
N!A
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Prior
Pre-
Construction Land
Constructio~
Other
?oral
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92 25
:':-1992-93
1410 365
1993-94
11994-95
Future
,i' *Total 25 1410
365 1800
I~ACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'F~rSt Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
$
~00,~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Ugdate (Sgring 1990)
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
PROJECT NAME~ NAPLES LANDFILL CELL 6~, l~t LIFT CLOSURE
DESCRIPTION: PHASED CLOSURE PER DER PERMIT
PROJECT LOCATION:
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 1005
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISIONz ~bn;IRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENTz SOLID WASTE
ORGANIZATIONs ~PLES LANDFILL
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measuramentl
1991-95 Total Deficiencyz
Size of This ProJect~
FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS)
Pre-
Construction Land Constructio~
1280
N/A
N/A
~/A
Other ~otal
1280
Total
1280
1280
IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit $
Number of Units
Gross Cost $
Less U~er Revenue
Nat Impact $
500~
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
~0
(years)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Second CIE Update (Spring 1990)
PROJECT SUKMARY FORM
TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE LANDFIL~
PROJECT NAMEs DEVELOP 300 ACRES LAND
DESCRIPTION: DEVELOP FUTURE LANDFILL LINED C~L~ AREAS
PROJECT LOCATION:
(#) (Planning District Name)
PROJECT # 1006
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
DIVISION, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE
ORGANIZATIONs NAPLES LANDFIbb
Prior
1989-90
Forecast
1990-91
Budget Year
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Future
IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY
Unit of Measurement: TONS
1991-95 Total Deficiency~~
Size of This ProJect~ 3.484.800
FIN~%NCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSAi~DS)
Pre-
¢o~struc~ion La~ Co~st~ctio~
Other Total
100 270 370
1400 1400
Total 100 1670 1770
iMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
'First Year of Impact
Cost per Unit
Number of Units
Gross Cost
Less User Revenue
Net Impact
$
ESTIMATED USEFUL
LIFE OF
FACILITY
7.~
(years)
APPENDIX C
COLLIER COUNTY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCING CAPACITY
SECOND CIE UPDATE
FY 91-95
Prepared by
Growth Management Department
LIST OF TABLES
Table #
2
5
6
Title
General Governmental Revenues by Source
General Governmental Expenditures by
Function
Bond Issuance, Debt Service & Direct
Capital Outlay Capacity
Ratio of General Bonded Debt to Assessed
Values and General Bonded Debt Per Capita
Schedule of Water & Sewer Funds Revenue
Bond Coverage
Forecast Models Statistical Measures
Pa~e
7
8
9
10
11
12
COLLIER COUNTY
Capital Improvement Financing Capacity
FY 91-95
Introduction
This forecast of Collier County's capacity to finance growth and
existing deficits related capital improvement through 1995 has been
prepared as a component of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of
the Collier County Growth Management Plan in compliance with Rule
9J-5 of the Florida Administrativa Code.
The forecasts, projections and estimates presented in this section
have been prepared as tools to aid County officials and staff in
planning for the period 1991-1995. None of the figures appearing in
this report are to be construed as absolute in terms of reliability
or as reflecting the intent of Collier County elected or appointed
officials. These projections present some possible alternatives
given a set of assumptions and variables. The variables are subject
to change by action of the Board of County Commissioners or their
appointed County Manager or in some cases may be affected by changes
in the level of economic activity.
The forecasts and analyses presented in this section are based on
established and tested statistical methods which predict future
trends based on past economic and demographic records. Significant
changes in the variables affecting these trends, i.e., the economic
climate, the propensity of people to migrate to Collier County, and
the willingness of the electorate to finance government initiatives
would impact the viability of the forecasts presented in this
section.
This analysis and the Second Annual CIE Update have been prepared
prior to the November, 1990 referendum on the 7th Cent Sales Tax
Infrastructure Surcharge. This analysis assumes the availability of
these revenues during the planning period FY91-95. Should the
referendum not pass, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
has adopted as policy their intent to raise the necessary revenues to
maintain concurrency through a county-wide Road Improvement
Assessment District. Current revenues are anticipated to be adequate
to maintain all other adopted LOS for public facilities.
420
- I -
Summary of Findings
The narrative, analysis and tables in this report establish that
Collier County has the financial capacity during the period 1991-1995
to provide the infrastructure and capital improvements needed by its
citizens. Applying a set of conservative assumptions and variables
the County, through prudent management of its resources, could
comfortably assume additional general obligation debt, revenue bonds,
and "pay as you go" capital improvements. The goals and levels of
service standards in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth
Management Plan are attainable within the financing capacity of
Collier County through 1995.
~iqhli~hts
$89,000,000 in additional debt capacity with revenues currently
in place
Capital Revenue millage levy at a stable 1.0 mill through 1995
will generate $78,142,000
Maintenance of a maximum bonded debt to taxable value ratio of
less than 0.52%
$144,000,000 in additional utility revenue bonding capacity with
no significant rate increases
Potential 7th Cent Sales Tax revenues (County Share) of
$67,000,000 from FY91-95 with bonding capacity of $111,000,000
- 2 -
COLLIER COUNTY
Capital Improvement Financing Capacity
Demographic & Fiscal Fore=asts
FY 91-95
I. ?0PULATION AND TAXABLE PROPERTY BASE
Collier County population grew at an exponential rate during the
period 1976-90 for a total increase of 136%. This pattern of rapid
growth is forecast to continue at the same or a slightly higher
periodic rate to 215,300 in 1995, an increase of 30% over 1990 (Table
4, Column 2).
As population has grown, so has the taxable property base. This is
due to the combined impact of a rapid increase in the County's real
property inventory due to new construction and the appreciation of
existing real property which is a reflection of demand for housing by
the influx of new residents.
Since the 1981 re-evaluation, taxable property values have increased
by 178%. Taxable property values are forecast to increase to
$19,179,000,000 in 1995 (Table 4, Column 3). This will provide an
ample ad valorem tax base to fund both "pay as you go" and bond
financing of infrastructure expansion and capital improvements in the
CIE to meet the needs of the rapidly growing population in Collier
County.
II. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
Tax collections and intergovernmental transfers, consisting
predominantly of ad valorem, sales, and g~ taxes, are the primary
source of revenue for government operations. These revenues are also
the most bondable revenues available to the County, resulting in
favorable terms and interest rates from lenders. These revenues will
continue to grow from 80% of total revenues in 1990 to 82% in 1995
(Table 1, Columns 2 and 4).
Due to the Florida constitutional prohibition against a State income
tax and the improbability of a change in public or political
attitudes opposing this revenue source during the forecast period
FY91-95, the State will experience continued difficulties eliminating
deficits in capital facilities for which it is responsible. Most
notably, State Roads improvements will have to be funded by Collier
County taxpayers during the period FY91-95 in order to maintain FDOT
mandated levels of service. An additional 4 cent per gallon gas tax
passed in the 1990 Legislative session will help but not eliminate
the State Roads deficit in Collier County.
- 3 -
Without a new revenue source, the major portion of the burden for
infrastructure and capital improvements during the period FY91-95
will fall on the real property owners of Collier County. A
referendum has been scheduled for November, 1990 on the 7th Cent
Sales Tax Infrastructure Surcharge. Approval of this revenue source
by the voters will provide ample additional funds for FY91-95 CIE
projects and eliminate the need for a County-wide Road Improvement
Assessment District.
If current revenues are inadequate Collier County also has more
latitude to levy additional ad valorem taxes to finance CIE
infrastructure capital projects than numerous Florida counties which
are currently at or approaching the constitutional 10 mill cap. the
Collier county-wide millage for FY 89/90 is 4.4123 which includes the
1 mill levy for a Capital Revenue Fund for both CIE and non-CIE
capital projects. The projections in this report are based on the
conservative assumption that the Capital Revenue Fund millage levy
will remain constant at 1 mill for the forecast period 1991-1995.
iii. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENSES
Revenues are forecast to grow from FY 91-95 in step with the County's
rapid population growth and economic expansion. Expenses are
projected to grow at a slightly slower rate with the costs for Public
Safety contributing the most alarming increases. Collier's growing
population has supported significant annual increases to the
Sheriff's budget over recent fiscal years. If this trend continues,
additional Ad Valorem tax increases may be necessary during the
period FY91-95. However, the County has significant unused revenue
raising capacity to finance the infrastructure and facilities capital
improvements necessary to maintain the quality of life for Collier
County residents identified in the adopted Levels of Service in the
Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. With a
prudent balance between bond issues and "pay-as-you-go" funding from
the 1 mill Capital Revenue Fund, the County should have the financial
ability to meet the demands of its citizens and maintain concurrency
in the 1990's.
IV. DEBT CAPACITY
The ability to finance additional bond issues will be of critical
importance if Collier County is to adequately meet the needs of its
citizens in the 1990's. Table 3 presents an estimate of maximum
additional bond issues and "pay as you go" capital improvement funds
available to the County based on forecast revenues for the period
FY91-95. Maximum comfortable debt service as a percentage of current
bondable revenues is assumed to be 13% . This is in keeping with
recent decisions by the electorate and the Board of County
Commissioners. For example, Debt Service Expenses in 1986 were 13.2%
- 4 -
of bondable revenues. Under this assumption, the County could
incrementally assume an additional $89,000,000 in bonds through 1995
(Table 3, Column 6). An additional $78,000,000 would be available
from the 1 Mill Capital Revenue Fund for "pay as you go" capital
improvements, contingencies, and as a buffer against forecast
variances (Table 3, Column 8).
The projections on additional debt capacity are carried forward and
added to existing general bonded debt to produce the forecasts on
Table 4, Columns 4-6 for 1991-1995. Under the previously described
assumption of a 13% comfort zone, Table 4, Column 4, shows the
resulting total general bonded debt if all additional capacity from
current revenues were used for general obligation bonds. The maximum
ratio of general bonded debt to taxable value would still be less
than 0.52% in 1995.
Revenues generated by the 7th Cent Sales Tax should not be subject to
the 13% "comfort zone" for current revenues. Current revenues must
support the general day-to-day operations of County Government and
should not be heavily pledged to debt service. Whereas, the 7th Cent
Sales Tax is intended and statutorily restricted to capital
facilities and may not be applied to operational expenses. Bonding
of the County's share of these revenues to the maximum extent would
provide the needed large sums of capital funds in the early years of
the five and ten year road construction plans without negatively
impacting current operating revenues.
V. WATER & SEWER FUNDS BONDED DEBT CAPACITy
Net revenue available to fund new bond issues in the utility funds
and to maintain the required 1.25 coveragg, ratio would allow the
issuance of an additional $144,000,000 in utility bonds through 1995.
Gross revenue (Table 5, Column 2) is projected to grow at an annual
rate of 8% based on demand.
424
- $ -
Forecas~ina Me~odolo~
The projections and estimates appearing in Tables 1-5 for the
forecast fiscal years 1991-1995 were prepared using standardized time
series forecasting and analysis techniques. Historical financial
data for the fourteen year period 1976-1989 (1981-1989 for Taxable
Value) appearing in "Collier County, Florida Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report," for the year ended September 30, 1989 were used to
prepare estimates for the fiscal years 1991-1995.
Statistical measurement models of various types were tested for all
time series on Tables 1-5 and various other relevant series not
appearing in the final report. A five step process was applied to
each series to select the model and resulting forecast which produced
the most realistic estimates as follows:
Analytical Steps
Basic statistical tests of all time series data for randomness
and autocorrelation to determine the most suitable analytical
model.
e
Prepare regression trend models and forecasts types: linear
trend, exponential trend, and polynomial trend for all time
series.
Compare statistical measures generated for each model and
resulting forecast to select the model which best fits each time
series.
Prepare Box-Jenkins models for historical series that did not fit
well into regression trend analysis. See note below.
Se
Consolidate historical time series models and forecasts into
projections of Collier County financial strength through 1995.
Note:
Box-Jenkins Modelinq
Calculation Method -
Marquard non-linear least squares with
background stepwise elimination of non-
significant coefficients.
Logged Models
Automatically selected for time series when
appropriate.
Automatic
Identification
Differencing, autoregressive and moving
average conversions applied via auto-
correlation function when appropriate.
- 6 -
1
Fiscal
Year
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
>~ (2)
9164
9830
10,973
11,341
13,481
17,324
17,539
22,074
25,383
30,555
32,470
45,463
51584
56742
62,417
68,658
75,524
83,077
91,384
3
Licenses
& Permits
$ 372
601
975
1,389
1,077
1,942
1,373
1,522
2,025
2,143
2,210
2,887
4,228
6,346
5,989
6,911
7,908
8,979
10,126
11,348
a~ez'~., oo,u,~me~m~p,z, ~gvg~ugs B~ sou~c~
$(ooo)
(1)
1976 - 1989 Historic~l
1990 - 1995 Projected
(Unaudited)
(2)
4
Inter-
Oovernmenta 1-
$ 3,094
4,088
6,783
3,064
6,139
6,748
6,437
10,794
11,116
11,240
11,779
12,415
15~100
16,181
18,285
27862
35,648
40,383
45,613
51,689
5
Charqes for
Services
$ 755
1,406
1,276
1,055
1,966
792
739
2,122
2,257
2,541
3,357
4,471
4,882
5,145
5,484
5,822
6,159
6,497
6,834
7,172
6
Ffnes&
Forfeitures
323
359
567
757
626
736
863
770
897
1,735
1,392
1,860
2,414
2,975
3,006
3,508
4,094
4,778
5,576
6,507
7
Interest
Miscellaneous
$ 1,460
1,134
1,586
1,226
1,923
2,163
2,370
2,053
2,438
2,374
2,548
2,613
2,915
4,344
3,761
4,066
4,396
4,752
5,137
5,553
Totals
$ 15,168
17,418
22,160
18,832
24,199
25,862
29,016
34,800
40,807
45,416
51,841
56,716
75,002
86~575
93,267
110,586
126~863
140,913
156,363
173,653
Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds
Intergovernmental Revenue projections include projected receipts frcxn the 7th Cent Sales Tax scheduled
for referendum in November, 1990
Bondable Revenues
TABLE I
1
Year
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
2
General
Oovernment
$ 3 373
3 541
5 051
4 433
5 145
5 914
7 , 579
8,326
8,213
9 ,715
11 ,546
13 207
15 636
18 952
19 687
22 382
25 446
28 930
32 890
37,392
1976 - 1989 Historical
1990 - 1995 Projected
(Unaudited)
3 4 5
Public Physical Trans-
Safety Environment portation
$ 3,259
4,020
4,411
6,237
7,327
8,347
10440
10,809
12388
15197
18443
22 18.$
25 344
33 223
37 078
43,955
52,109
61,774
73,233
86,817
$ 1,674
1,502
1,186
904
1,359
1,356
1,677
870
995
1 ,261
2 ~290
2 ,313
2 ~092
2,908
2,259
2,346
2,434
2,522
2,610
2,698
$1757
2283
2579
3 449
4516
4 214
4 767
5 120
5120
5 377
5 613
5 753
6242
6620
6 875
7 249
7 623
7 998
8 372
8,746
6
Economic
Environment
$ 411
877
2,145
2,010
1,741
1,795
726
2,002
1,396
739
413
695
871
1,390
1,473
1,562
1,656
1,755
1,860
1,972
(1)
7
Human
Services
$ 980
934
1,236
866
1,091
1,336
1,857
2,003
2,017
2,203
2 507
3,202
3,830
3,730
3,836
4,048
4,259
4,471
4,683
4894
8
Culture ~
Recreation
$ 516
641
777
948
1117
1,277
1570
1563
1,703
1858
2,285
2,824
3,558
4,388
4,628
5,456
6,433
7,584
8,942
10,542
9
Debt
Service
$ 822
898
948
1,120
973
1,319
2,284
3,708
5,677
5,934
5,599
7,433
6,709
6,847
7,596
7,604
7,517
8,029
8,007
7,979
10
Totals
$12,792
14 696
18 333
19 967
23 269
25558
30,900
34,401
37,509
42,284
48,696
57,611
64,282
78,058
83,432
94,602
107,477
123,063
140,597
16!,040
Note:
Includes General, Special Revenue (excluding Capital Revenue Fund
{196} and Debt Service Funds
TABLE 2
COLLI~ COUNTY
BOI~D IS~UAIqcE, D~BT S~.VIC~ &
DIRECT CAPITAL OUT.AT CAPACITY
FY 91-95
F£scal
Year
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
I
I
Notes:
! 2 3 4 5 6 *7 8
(1)
(2)
Dqb~ $~r~ice 7th Cent
CaD&citY at sales Tax
Projected 13% of Current Additional Incremental
Current Bondable Rev. & Current Revenue Incremental Bon__~d
Bondable ~00% .of 7th Cent Outstandinq Available for Issuance Issuance
RevgnueS (!} Sales ~mx Rev. Debt Service Debt Service CaDacity (2~ Capacity
$ 90,279,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 7,604,000 $ 10,396,000 $ 34,328,000 $48,925,000
104,306,000 24,260,000 7,517,000 16,743,000 13,405,000 32,281,000
115,907,000 27,248,000 8,029,000 19,219,000 8,335,000 9,905,000
128,690,000 30,476,000 8,007,000 22,469,000 15,575,000 9,507,000
143,073,000 34,259,000 7,979,000 26,280,000 17,293,000 .10,324~000
Revenue
Fund ¢196k
County-wide
!2,775,000
13,708,000
15,332,000
17,148,000
~9.179.000
TASLE 3
ORAND TOTAL $ 278,020,000
(Columns 6-8)
stable at 8% with a 25-year
Cent Sales Tax Revenues.
The sum of Column 2 and 4, Table 1
The average interest rate on Collier County bond issues is assumed to remain
amortization for current bondable revenues and a 10-year amortization for 7th
TOTALS $ 88,936,000 $110,942,000 $ 78,142,000
· .ATIO OF G~ B~)NDZD DEBT TO I%~SESg~D VALI~S AND ~ BOnDeD D~ST F~ ~tP~TA
Fiscal
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
~]4otes .*
.-.4
~ (1)
1 2 3
1976 - 1990 Riator£cal
1991 - 1995 Projected
Populatioq
64,800
68,900
74,600
82,000
86,000
91,100
98,100
100,900
109,400
118,900
126,000
130,600
139,000
152,600
165,400
175,400
185,400
195,300
205,300
215,300
~axable Value
(in Millions)
$ 1,675
1,726
1,856
1 998
2154
3926
4 108
5 443
5,859
6,427
7.142
7735
8~435
9~253
10.913
12.775
13.708
15.332
17.148
19.179
(Unaudited)
& 5 6
~axi.~ Potg~t/aL ~stio of
General Bo~e~ ~ _Debt Per
Debt (1) ~ Cap/k!
$ 1,627,529 0.10% $ 25.12
1,505,308 0.09 21.85
1,396,511 0.08 18.72
1,276,615 0.06 15.57
1,138,953 0.05 13.25
1,048,457 0.03 11.51
954,261 0.02 9.73
8,501,709 0.16 84.26
8,799,135 0.15 80.43
8,524,855 0.13 71.70
9,352,000 0.14 74.22
8,915,000 0.12 63.28
8,633,000 0.10 62.11
8,308,000 0.09 54.44
8,260,000 0.08 49.94
46,750,000 0.37 266.53
59,414,000 0.44 320.63
66,947,000 0.44 342.79
81,664,000 0.48 397.7B
98,038,000 0.52 455.42
Maximum potential general bonded debt for forecast years 1991-1995 ia the sum of current issues and
Column 6, Table 3. For demonstration, the assumption is that 13% of current revenues would be used to
fund G.O.B. debt.
TABLE
Fiscal
Year_
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
Notes:
(1)
~ (2)
(3)
~l:,J¢)
~ (5)
~OSS
Revenue (2)
1,S57,079
1,699,207
2,435,973
5,225,163
6,121,650
6,138,269
7,200,588
7,980,000
10,748,000
14 534,000
18 394,000
19 865,000
21 455,000
23 171,000
25 025,000
27 027,000
29 189,000
SCHEDULE OF WA~ & S~ ~S ~ ~ ~OZ (1)
1979 - 1989 Historical
1990 - 1995 P~Ject~
(Unaudited)
3 A 5 6
Net Revenue
Available for Zxistinq
Debt Service & Debt Coveraq9
Expenses (3) Capital Service (5) Ratio (4)
983,091 $ 573,988 $ 423,803 1.35
1,067,645 631,562 209,732 3.01
1,299,388 1,136,585 274,384 4.14
1,841,494 3,383,699 1,122,859 3.01
2,024,768 4,096,882 2,389,893 1.71
2,616,489 3,521,780 2,827,433 1.25
3,319,489 3,880,708 2,621,693 1.48
3,903,000 4,077,000 2,161,000 1.89
5,048,000 5,700,000 2,484,000 2.29
5,960,000 8,574,000 3,997,000 2.15
5,782,000 12,612,000 5,574,000 2.26
6,244,000 13,621,000 6,029,000 2.26
6,744,000 14,711,000 6,776,000 2.17
7,283,000 15,888,000 5,755,000 2.76
7,866,000 17,159,000 5,718,000 3.00
8,496,000 18,531,000 5,708,000 3.25
9,175,000 20,014,000 5,604,000 3.57
7 8
Debt Servic9
~ ~ncreuental
Coveraq~ _Bond ~ssua~C9
Ratio 1.25 Capacit~
./A ./A
./A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A ~/A
N/A ./A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
./A N/A
N/A ./A
N/A N/A
N/A
./A ./A
6,348,000 79,350,000
1,758,000 21,975,000
1,046,000 13,075,000
1,106,000 13,825,000
1,270,000 15 875 000
$ 144,100,000
(6)
No bonds outstanding prior to 1979 - coverage applies to the County Water-Sewer District, Marco Water and Sewer
District and Goodland Water District.
Operating revenues plus other income exclusive of extraordinary gains.
Total expenses excluding depreciation, bond interest, amortization, and extraordinary losses.
Net revenue divided by total deb~ service requirements. Bond covenants require that the ratio not fall below
1.25.
Debt Service on current bond issues through 1995.
Bonds are assumed to be issued at a 30 year maturity with an 8% average interest rate.
TABLE 5
~ab~e
1.
FOREC~S~J~ 140D~,,.S S~-.W.TXS'~XC,W~T. MF, ABO'R~S
Column
Forecast ~odel R-Square Chiso ¢4) ~J4S~ ~ YV°babllit~
2 Exponential Trend (log) 0.9794 1.92 682.4 6.2% 75.3%
3 Exponential Trend (log) ) 0.9925 3.05 832.3 5.2% 55.2%
4 Linear Trend 0.3705 3.00 498.8 27.8% 56.1%
5 Box-Jenkins (differenced) N/A 3.23 351.9 5.5% 52.2%
6 Box-Jenkins (x 106% FY91-95) N/A 2.20 623.3 63.9% 70.2%
7 Box-Jenkins (differenced) N/A 1.90 298.1 12.5% 75.7%
8 Box-Jenkins (log differenced) N/A 8.17 143.9 5.2% 8.5%
2 See Note 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 Polynomial Trend 0.8591 5.70 641.4 31.3% 22.2%
4 See Note 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 Box-Jenkins (differenced) N/A 4.74 669.1 34.2% 31.4%
6 Exponential Trend (log) 0.9289 3.33 219.5 13.8% 50.6%
7 Exponential Trend (log) 0.8304 1.72 321.5 12.8% 79.0%
3 Exponential Trend (FY81-89) 0.9826 3.58 354.3 3.9% 46.7%
Tax receipts are forecast to increase 10% annually through FY95 as a result of an average 4% increase per year
in new construction and an average 6% increase in tax rates.
Collier County has experienced increases: in intergovernmental revenues ranging from 10% to 20% in recent years.
An average increase of 13% per year is forecast through FY95.
Statistical models, and resulting forecasts were developed by the Collier County Growth Management Department using
personal computers and the statistical forecasting software, pRO*CAST, from Fleming Software, Oakton, Virginia.
APPENDIX D
COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 TO 1994-95
APPENDIX D
COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
CAPIT~/~IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 TO 1994-95
INTRODUCTION
The Collier County School Board provides for public education
within the County including incorporated and unincorporated areas.
The five-member School Board has no regulatory authority over land
use, however, it does influence land use and public facility
decisions through required expansion of education facilities on
existing sites, its exchange of predetermined school sites, and its
selection of additional school sites for future development.
The responsibility of Collier County under the Growth Management
Act has been to review the School Board's Capital Improvement
Program to determine consistency with the comprehensive plan,
corresponding land development regulations, and any impact on the
County's public facilities.
In addition, Rule 9J-5.016(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code
(F.A.C.), requires "The geographic service area and location of
major system components for the public education and public health
systems within the local government's jurisdiction shall be
identified (in the Growth Management Plan's Capital Improvements
Element). Also, Rule 9J-5.016(2) (d) f~quires the County to analyze
"the impact of new or improved public educational and public health
care systems and facilities on the provision of infrastructure."
In 1990, the Florida State Legislature (HB 3709) voted to require,
among other things, that local school boards submit a notice of
intent to construct a school facility 90 days prior to submitting
an application to a city or county; and the city or county must,
once a complete application is received, determine within another
90 days whether the proposal is consistent with the local Growth
Management Plan and land development regulations.
NOTE:
This analysis only includes public education facilities;
there are no local public health facilities within Collier
County.
433
- I -
The Collier County School Board, after many public hearings,
approved a new five-year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), 1990-
1995, and funding plan. The CIP reflects the impact of restoring
over $30 million in projects to the CIP which had been deferred due
to an appeal to the Florida Supreme Court of the School Board's
Certificates of Participation (COP) funding program. (COP funds
are used to liquidate principal and interest in the form of rent
payments on specific school facilities.) Since the Court recently
upheld the legality of the COP's, the Board has restored these
projects to its long-range capital plan. The CIP also reflects a
more realistic projection of the educational requirements essential
to support the County's rapidly increasing student population.
The purpose of this appendix is to analyze the School Board's new
Capital Improvements Plan and its potential impact upon the
County's public facilities, including Roads, Sanitary Sewers,
Potable Water, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Parks and Recreation.
434
- 2 -
~NALySIS
Student Pogulation
Current population projections reflect an 81% increase in the total
number of students attending the County's public schools, grades
K-12, over the next decade -- 1990 through 2000.
Student Population
Elementary School
1990 2000 ~ Increase
11,362 18,209 60%
Middle School 4,709 9,441 100%
High School 5.129 10.692 108%
TOTAL 21,200 38,342 81%
New ProGram Re_~utrements
Additional classrooms dedicated to new or expanded educational
programs mandated by the State for the exceptional child (mentally
or physically handicapped) also impact the number of student
stations required over the next decade.
~apita~ Improvement Plan (1990-1995)
To support this rapidly growing student population and new program
demands, the School Board estimates that $85,325,000 will be needed
for the planning, site work, construction and equipment of four new
Elementary Schools, one new Middle Sc~bol, and one new High School
between 1990 and 1995. An additional $45,900,000 will be required
for renovation, expansion and maintenance of existing public school
facilities, and approximately $4,500,000 will be required to
remodel and upgrade the County's adult and vocational educational
facilities. Approximately $120,242,870 will fund related projects
including those brought forward from prior year funding, COP
transfer to debt service, site acquisition, the purchase of new
buses, and other requirements.
Capital Improvement Plan Fundinq Sources
These capital projects are not included in the County's Capital
Improvement Element. However, approximately 90% of the revenues
required to support the school's 5-year Capital Improvement Program
is dependent upon local revenue sources.
SQurce Percent
Federal 0 %
State 10 %
Local
~00~ ~UP~,.r4~ 90 %
- 3 -
Existing School and suppor~ Facilities
Collier County is divided into three (3) geographic school service
areas: Naples/Marco Island, Immokalee, and Everglades city. At
present, over one thousand acres have been identified by the School
Board for educational facilities in Collier County and the City of
Naples. The following schools and support facilities can be
located on the map on page 7 of this appendix. (Maps LU-83, LU-84,
and LU-85 of the Future Land Use Element will be amended during the
next Plan Amendment Cycle to reflect the School Board's current
land holdings and site acquisitions.)
,f
NAPLES/MARCO AREA FACILITIES
~lementarv 5chools
MaD # Acres
2 Avalon Elementary 11.25
4 Big Cypress Elementary 19.86
6 Golden Gate Elementary 15.56
8 Golden Terrace Elementary 23
10 Lake Park Elementary 9.91
11 Lely Elementary 22
15 Naples Elementary 20.92
17 Poinciana Elementary 18.49
19 Sea Gate Elementary 15
20 Shadowlawn Elementary 14.86
21 Tommie Barfield Elementary 21.29
22 Vineyards Elementary 18
Middle Schools
16 Pine Ridge Middle - 36.88
9 Gulfview Middle 10.62
7 Golden Gate Middle 26.94
5 East Naples Middle 17.09
~igh Schools
3 Barron G. Collier High 80
12 Lely High 50.57
14 Naples. High 23.89
Support Facilities
1 Administrative Center 3
13 Maintenance/Transportation 20
18 Production/Warehouse 3
23
Adult & Vocational Facilities
J. Lorenzo Walker Vocational Technical
Center
40 , 436
- 4 -
22.6
MaD # Acres
24 Everglades School (K-12) 3.69
~KMOKALEE
Elementary school~
26 Highlands 13.27
29 Lake Trafford 15
30 Pinecrest 10
31 Village Oaks 20
Middle schools
27 immokalee Middle 7.33
School
28 Immokalee High 43.41
Education Facilities
25 Bethune Education Center ~5
TOTAL ACRES OF EXISTING FACILITIES
632.43
Land ~0~4inqs and Site Acquisitions
Future planning and commitments have been made to secure additional
sites for expansion and construction of new facilities. At
present, twelve (12) vacant sites have been identified for future
educational facilities and four (4) additional sites are currently
being considered.
V~C~d~r SITES
33
34
35
36
Hap # Acres
32 North Pine Ridge Road Site/Barron 79.09
Collier
Golden Gate Estates High School 64
The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 27,
Township 51 South, Range 29 East 2.5
Hendry Property 0.66
Heath-Roberts Property 23.6
- 5 -
~aD #
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
(continued)
The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/2
of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4, Section 4, Township
47 South, Range 29 East
Henderson Property
Gran Property
Deltona Settlement
Deltona Settlement
Deltona Settlement
Orangetree PUD
Golden Gate East of Golf Course
4.74
1
92.04
11.60
13.20
12
24.98
3O
PROPOSED SITES
Pelican Bay Exchange
Pelican Bay Exchange
Pelican Bay Exchange
Parklands PUD
20
UNDETERMINED
28
UNDETERMINED
TOTAL ACRES VACANT AND PROPOSED
SITESz
TOTAL ACRES:
1,039.84
- 6 -
, f
41
COLLIER COUNTY pUBLIC SCHOOL~
VACANT s ~rE.s
PROPOSED SITES;
SCALE
10.~1.
EXISTING SCHOOL & SUPPORT F^CE..rrlES ~
4O
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUM~4AR¥ FOR 1990-~995
EVERGLADES AREA
Renovation and improvements of $400,000 are scheduled for
Everglades school (K-12) in 1991-1992.
IMMOKALEE AREA
Pinecrest Elementary will be expanded in 1991-1992 at an estimated
cost of $500,000.
A major expansion of Highlands Elementary is scheduled to be
completed in 1992-1993 at a cost of $8,850,000 for planning,
construction, renovation and equipment.
A new Elementary School is scheduled for completion in 1994-1995 at
a cost of $11,300,000 for planning, construction and equipment.
A new Middle School, funded from prior year projects brought
forward, is scheduled for completion in 1991-1992. An additional
$500,000 will be needed to complete the site work.
The expansion of Immokalee High School will be completed in
1993-1994 at a cost of $2,325,000.
In 1991-1992, the Bethune Education Center will receive new
cabinetry and chalkboards, and renovated restrooms and
cafeteria/kitchen, at an estimated cost of $160,000.
The 5-year capital outlay for the Immo~alee and Everglade City
Schools totals $24,035,000.
NAPLES/MARCO AREA
Elementary Schools
In 1991-1992, Sea Gate Elementary will be renovated at a cost of
$780,000.
In 1992-1993, Golden Gate Elementary, Poinciana Elementary,
Shadowlawn Elementary, Tommie Barfield Elementary, and Naples Park
Elementary Schools are scheduled for renovation and expansion at a
total cost of $5,710,000.
To accommodate growth, three new Elementary Schools are planned for
construction between 1991 and 1996 at a total cost of $34,875,000
for planning, construction and equipment.
40 , 440
- 8 -
N~PLES/MARCO
Middle Schools
At Pine Ridge Middle School, construction of a second school
building, and remodeling of the existing facility, are scheduled
for completion by 1993. Approximately $5,650,000 will be added to
funds from prior year projects brought forward for the cost of
construction and equipment.
Gulfview and Golden Gate Middle Schools are scheduled for
renovation in 1992-1993 at a cost of over $6 million.
Planning for a fourth Middle School in the Naples/Marco area will
begin in 1993-1994, with completion anticipated by 1995 at a cost
of $18,500,000.
High Schools
In 1991-1992, Barron Collier High is scheduled for expansion and
renovation from 1350 student stations to 1800 student stations at a
cost of $5,200,000.
In 1992-1993, Naples High and Lely High are both scheduled for
expansion to provide more than 1,000 new student stations at a cost
of $10,225,000.
To accommodate growth, a new High School in the Naples/Marco area,
built in two phases and providing 2,300 new student stations, is
scheduled to begin construction in 1994-1995 at an estimated cost
of $20,150,000.
Adult & vocational School
The Collier County Vocational'Center will require expansion and
upgrade during the next five years at a cost of $4,500,000.
The 5-year capital outlay for Naples/Marco Schools totals
$111,690,000.
Level of ServiCe Standards
At this time there is no indication that the expansion, renovation
and new construction of educational facilities over the next five
years will negatively impact the County's level of service
standards on public facilities. Ail planning for expansion and
construction of new facilities on new and existing sites within the
County will be reviewed by the County for level of service
compliance in accordance with its Growth Management Plan and
corresponding land use regulations.
40 , 441
- 9 -
APPENDIX E
TIMING AND LOCATION OF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CURRENT LOCAL PRACTICES
Second CIE Update
Prepared by
Growth Management Department
Spring, 1990
TIMI~ AND LOCATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
9J-5.016(2)(a) requires an analysis of the current local practices
that guide the timing and location of construction, extension or
increases in capacity of each public facility. 9J-5.016(2)(e)
requires an analysis of the use of timing and location of capital
improvements to public facilities to support efficient land
development and goals, objectives and policies in the future land use
element. This analysis must take into consideration plans of state
agencies and water management districts that provide public
facilities within the local government's jurisdiction. By
definition, public facilities includes transportation, sewer, solid
waste, drainage, potable water, education, parks and recreational,
and public health systems or facilities.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS OR FACILITIES
The Collier County Transportation Services Division and the Naples/
Collier County MPO work in a coordinated manner to provide the
planning and design of transportation systems and facilities within
the County. The primary system of transportation within Collier
County is the extensive network of roadways, including federal,
state, and county roads. This network must be considered as a single
working unit when any type of analysis is performed to evaluate
current or projected needs and proposed improvements. The initial
planning processes rely on the projected land use types and time of
development along with any ongoing federal, state, or county roadway
improvement projects or programs. Using these projections,
anticipated traffic volumes and patterns are developed and analyzed
for their effects on the existing roadway network, and improvements
or new roadway corridors are proposed to adequately handle the
anticipated traffic. The planning window for this process is
currently held to 5-year and 10-year time ~rames. For the general
municipal area, some very long range planning is also done using a
25-year time frame window.
Once the long range planning identifies a need within the 10-year
window, a design and construction timeline is prepared. This
timeline includes the various phases of engineering design, right-of-
way identification and acquisition, permitting, and construction.
Due to the numerous variables that must be considered for each
roadway, each timeline will be different, but most highway
construction projects can typically be completed within a three to
four year period.
In addition to the long range planning process, monitoring programs
are utilized to determine the actual traffic patterns and volumes.
Data from these programs are analyzed to determine the effectiveness
of the planning process and identify specific problem areas. By
comparing the data collected through the years, projection mechanisms
40 443'
can be amended to reflect the measured situation. Monitoring
programs are also used to provide an indication of when a section of
roadway is operating insufficiently or is approaching this condition.
Both the long range planning and monitoring procedures are utilized
to prepare a prioritized transportation capital improvement projects
list. This list is annually updated to reflect the most up-to-date
needs, show the anticipated project timelines, and determine when
funding must be incorporated into the County budget to undertake
these projects. While sudden growth spurts in individual areas can
create localized problems, the general procedures described above are
usually adequate to handle the transportation needs in a timely
manner.
SEWER SYSTEMS ,AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to
prepare a sanitary sewer facilities development master plan in 1978.
This master plan was updated in 1986 in a report entitled "Coastal
Collier County 201 Facilities Plan Update." This updated 201 Plan
was approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners
and provides the Utilities Division with the current and projected
facilities and populations within the identified sewer service area
and a schedule of facility expansions necessary to meet the service
needs.
The Utility Services Division is currently using the recommended
capital improvement program in the 201 Facilities Plan Update to
schedule the design and construction of sanitary sewer treatment
plants and collection systems have been analyzed for projected
demands based on population projections within the various planning
communities of the Future Land Use Element% the corresponding
schedule of necessary capital improvements can be followed as long as
the observed development remains consistent with the projections.
The 201 Facilities Plan Update identifies when an improvement is
needed to be put into service, but does not include any scheduling
for design, permitting, or construction. Based on the size and type
of facility and the need to obtain state and/or federal funding
assistance, the lead time can vary from one year for a small
collection pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or
major collection system project.
As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the
County sanitary sewer system continues, the Utility Services division
will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary,
adjust the facilities scheduling so that the sanitary sewer facility
capacity will be available concurrent with future development.
40 , 444
- 2 -
SOLID WASTE ~YSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Solid Waste Department is responsible for the
design and operational supervision of the solid waste system and
facilities within the County. These facilities include a county-
operated sanitary landfill and a contract hauler collection system.
The present method of facility sizing utilizes the extensive records
keeping that has been developed by the Solid Waste Department. The
relationship between observed population growth and solid waste
disposal requirements al].ows this department to project the
anticipated solid waste disposal needs for projected populations.
Incorporating this information into a long range facility site plan
allows the department to design, locate, and construct
environmentally sound disposal facilities, with the capacity for
several years of disposal, at an economical savings. Due to the
extensive permitting process and time necessary to construct the
larger facility sites, a lead time of approximately two years is
necessary for landfill disposal sites.
At this time, the Solid Waste Department is also preparing a master
plan which will identify and evaluate other methods of solid waste
disposal. These methods will vary from recycling to resource
recovery through thermal reduction. The timing of construction and
implementation of these various methods of solid waste disposal will
be a part of the master plan.
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Water Management Department is responsible for the
scheduling of construction and maintenance projects and programs for
the public drainage systems and facilities throughout the
unincorporated portions of the County. Past practice has generally
been to coordinate the construction of any new canals with the
Collier County Transportation Department's road construction program.
At the present time, the Water Management Department has contracted
with a consultant to prepare a Water Management Master Plan for the
entire County. This plan will identify and officially establish the
boundaries for the various watersheds or basins, analyze the
condition and capacity of the existing drainage/water management
facilities within each basin, identify the needed improvements to the
various facilities to achieve the desired level of service standards,
and develop a program for the phased improvement of the entire
County's water management system to produce an environmentally sound
network of facilities that can be achieved through an established
capital improvement program. The Master Plan will be based on the
various land use types identified on the Future Land Use map and will
provide for the necessary water management facilities assuming
maximum allowed development for each land use type.
- 3 -
Subsequent to the completion of the Water Management Master Plan, a
series of individual basin plans will be completed to specifically
analyze and design the facilities or improvements needed for each
basin where necessary major improvements have been identified by the
Master Plan. These basin plans will incorporate any proposed
improvements by other state or local agencies and the South Florida
Water Management District. Current regulatory and fiscal implication
practices for constructing or modifying drainage/water management
facilities require a lead time of approximately one year for design
and permitting and six months to two years for construction.
POTABL~ WATER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to
prepare a potable water facilities development master plan in 1985
and 1986. This document is contained in two volumes entitled "Phase
I Water Master Plan for Western Collier County" and "Phase II Water
master Plan for Western Collier County." This Water Master Plan was
approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners and
provides the Utility Services Division with the projected growth
within the identified water service area and a schedule of facility
expansions necessary to meet the service needs.
The Utility Services Division is currently using the scheduled
capital improvement program in the Water Master Plan. Since both the
existing and proposed water treatment and distribution system have
been analyzed for projected demands based on population projections
within the various planning communities of the Future Land Use
Element, the corresponding schedule of necessary capital improvements
can be followed as long as the observed development remains
consistent with the projections. The Water Master Plan lists when an
improvement is needed to be put into service, but does not include
any scheduling for design, permitting, or construction. Based on
the size and type of facility, the lead time can vary from one year
for a small pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or
wellfield construction project.
As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the
County potable water system continues, the Utility Services Division
will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary,
adjust the facilities scheduling so that the potable water supply
will be available concurrent with future development.
EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The District School Board of Collier County of the Collier County
Public School system is responsible for the planning, operation, and
expansion of the educational systems and facilities. This Board
utilizes a five-year Comprehensive Educational Plan which is updated
annually to identify the projected needs and anticipated funding
- 4 -
requirements. In addition to providing adequate school facilities,
this plan also includes the necessary support facilities such as
transportation, administration, warehouse, and maintenance.
The process for developing this five-year Comprehensive Educational
Plan-incorporates several continual planning and evaluation programs.
The Florida Department of Education has established some guidelines
for determining when new or expanded facilities are needed. These
include a five-year survey of existing facilities to evaluate their
adequacy. If a rapid increase in student loading creates an over-
crowded condition and projections indicate that there is not enough
time to institute a five-year survey, there are provisions for
conducting a spot survey. Proper planning is essential in this phase
of development since a school facility design and construction
program requires a lead time ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 years, depending
on the type of facility needed.
In addition to examining the condition of the facilities, the School
Board conducts a continual land evaluation and acquisition program.
This program uses the population projections for the County to
determine which areas will develop a sufficient student base to
Justify the construction of schools. Once the projected need is
identified, potential land sites are identified and procedures
implemented to obtain title to the land either by purchase, trade
agreements, or receipt of contributions. Potential sites are usually
identified and obtained a minimum of three years before the
construction of facilities is proposed.
PARKS AND R~CR~ATIONAL SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department of the Public
Services Division is responsible for the planning, operation, and
expansion of the County's recreational needs. A broad based
recreation plan has been prepared whereby the County can provide for
many of the recreational needs of the citizens through the
development of community parks located near the various population
centers. At present, there is no formal method for evaluating
capital improvements. Projects are suggested by staff, the general
public, the Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Board, the County
Manager, or even the individual Commissioners of the Board of County
Commissioners. This informal method of recommendation has proven to
be very useful in providing the desired recreational facilities
within the overall guidelines of the County's recreational plan.
PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES
The Collier County Health Department is responsible for the public
health facilities operated by the County. The planning and
development of the facilities and programs is generally conducted in
447
- 5 -
response to legislated requirements and directions from the State
Health Department. Planning projections are used to predict
potential health problem areas, but the department is usually not
able to obtain funding assistance until the problems actually
develop. While this method of operation is reactive rather than
pro-active, the usually rapid response for funding assistance allows
the department to operate effectively in meeting the health needs of
the County.
448'
- 6 -
APPENDIX F
COLLIER COUNTY
CAPIT~L IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FIN]tNCING PLaN
Second CIE Update (Spring, 1990)
Prepared by
Growth Management Department
Finance Committee
40~,,', 449
COLLIER COUNTY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Financing Plan
Second Update (Spring 1990}
I. OBJECTIVES
Between January, 1987 and August, 1988 the citizens of Collier County
Joined the County staff and Board of County Commissioners in 197
public meetings, workshops, and hearings. As a result of this
community effort, standards of service were set for thirteen (13)
types of public facilities. These Level of Service Standards
identified in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvement Element define
the quality of life and environment that the citizens of Collier
County want to maintain as the Growth Management Plan is implemented
through the coming years.
In order to maintain the Level of Service Standards, eliminate
deficiencies and provide new facilities for future growth, the County
will need to improve or construct $287,940,000 of infrastructure
during the period FY90/91 - FY94/95. To make this Capital
Improvement Program financially feasible in accordance with the
requirements of Rule 9J-5 F.A.C., the Board of County Commissioners
must approve a balanced funding plan from existing and available
revenue sources. Additionally the Board must adopt alternative
revenue policies, should revenues used to fund this plan which
require voter approval not be passed at referendum.
The existing situation at the outset of this financing plan if all
available capital revenues were committed to the CIE during the
period covered by the CIE can be summarized as follows:
Recommended CIE Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
FDOT 5-year work program
Developer Contributions
Gas Taxes
Impact Fees
User Fees
Grants & Trusts'
Carry Forward
i Mill Capital Revenue FY91-95
$ 4,865,000
1,768,000
24,922,000
109,997,000
10,205,000
1,427,000
12,594,000
78,142,000
Minimum Additional Revenues Needed
$287,940,000
44,020,000
450
- 1 -
II. FINANCINO PLAN POLICIES
This financing plan for generating additional needed revenues is
predicated on the adoption of several policies by the Collier County
Board of County commissioners, the policies reflect the spirit and
intent of the 1985 Growth Management Act, equitable distribution of
costs among taxpayers, and sound fiscal policy:
Existing facility deficiencies measured against the established Level
of Service Standards for the Collier County population at the time of
adoption of the Growth Management Plan, January 10, 1989, will be
eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and
intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity.
Where the need for a new facility is identified with the projected
influx of new residents during the planning period FY91-95, the
revenues to build that facility will be generated by impact fees to
the extent practical. These impact fees will be set at the maximum
level justified by the County's current cost of each facility type, a
level which is legally defensible in case of court challenge.
Policy #~
The County's existing levy for the Capital Revenue Fund will be
maintained at a minimum of either 1 Mill or the constant dollar
equivalent of the FY91 tax dollars collected in the Fund at the
discretion of the Board of County Commissioners depending on the
results of the November, 1990 referendum on the Local Option Sales
Tax Surcharge (7th Cent). Funds in the C~ital Revenue Fund not
needed for CIE projects will be applied towards non-CIE capital
projects.
Certain large scale projects of significant County-wide impact and
cost would, if funded with current ad valorem taxes in the year of
construction, result in an unacceptable millage rate. These projects
may be proposed for General Obligation Bonding. The electorate may
be asked through referendum to approve the borrowing of funds for the
projects and the levy of ad valorem taxes to pay the resulting debt
service. The defeat of a referendum on any or all of the projects
will result in a lowering of the Level of Service Standard for
related facilities.
Policy #5
The Enterprise funds, i.e. Water, Sewer and Solid Waste are operated
on the "service business" concept that the user pays for the service.
Therefore, no general or intergovernmental tax revenues will be used
40.': 451
- 2 -
for capital projects within these funds. CIE Projects within these
funds will be financed by water and sewer impact fees and user fees,
Clean Water Act grants and/or loans, landfill fees, and revenue bonds
supported by the appropriate levels of user fees.
During the implementation period of the CIE of the Growth Management
Plan, the assessment ratio for property valuation for the levy of ad
valorem taxes will remain at 100% of "just value" in accordance with
Chapter 193.011 F.S.
Policy #7
Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general
governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources
of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the
application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities,
prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of restraint.
Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State shared
revenues, specifically, gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The
13% limitation will not apply to revenues received by the County from
the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (7th Cent) if it should be
approved by the Collier electorate. The maximum amortization period
for bond issues funded by the 7th Cent Sales Tax will be ten (10)
years. The Enterprise funds operate under utility bonding ratios set
by the financial markets and existing debt and are, therefore,
excluded from this debt policy.
Policy #8 - Collier County will plac~.a referendum before the
voters in November, 1990 to approve the levy of the Local Option
Sales Tax Surcharge (Tth Cent). If approved by the electorate,
revenues generated will be used to construct facilities identified in
the CIE through a combination of bonding and cash flow. Any bonds
issued based on the pledge of this revenue will be governed by Policy
$7 of this Financing Plan. Revenue generated in excess of identified
needs in the CIE will be used to provide non-CIE facilities and
improvements identified on the referendum ballot consistent with the
requirements of Chapter 212.055(3)F.S.
Policy #9
Prior to fiscal year 1990-91 the County shall adopt a Stormwater
Run-off Utility Fee System or alternative revenue source in order to
fund drainage facility improvements.
policy ~10
The County will place a referendum before the voters to institute a
general obligation bond for the purchase of Regional Park Land and
facilities if the 7th Cent Sal~f. Tax ~{e~erendum fails.
- 3 -
If the Local Option Sales Tax Surcharge (7th Cent) is not approved by
the electorate in November, 1990, the County will establish a
County-wide Road Improvement Assessment District in FY90/91 to fund
that portion of County and State road improvements identified in the
Second Annual CIE Update for which the 7th Cent Sales Tax has been
identified in this CIE Financing Plan as the primary revenue source.
Policy #12
The primary source of funding for CIE Project $400, County Jail, will
be 7th Cent Sales Tax revenue as identified in this CIE Financing
Plan. If the 7th Cent Sales Tax is not approved by the electorate in
November, 1990, a General Obligation Bond referendum will be brought
before the electorate for funding of the County Jail.
III. FINANCING PLAN DETAIL
County Arterial & Collector Roads
Planned Road Construction Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
Gas Taxes 24,922,000
Impact Fees 31,834,000
Additional Revenues Needed
$106,895,000
56.756.000
50,139,000
Recommended Additional Revenue Source:
7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue
50.139.000
Net $ - 0 -
Gas tax and impact fee revenues will not be adequate in the short
term (5 years) to fund necessary improvements during the period
FY91-95 needed to maintain the service standards as measured by
traffic volumes adopted in the Traffic Circulation Element.
State Roads Network
Needed State Road Improvements FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
FDOT Funding (5-year work plan) $ 4,865,000
Developer Contributions 1,000,000
Additional Revenue Needed
Recommended Additional Revenue Source:
7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue
Net
40
~ 4 ~
$ 41,600,000
5.86~,000
35,735,000
35.735.00Q
$ - 0 -
The continued uninterrupted development of Collier County is
dependent upon the maintenance of LOS standards for state roads
adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the CIE. Current state funding contained
in the FDOT 5-year work plan does not provide the minimum
improvements necessary to maintain concurrency.
Water an4 Sewer Svstpm
Planned Water and Sewer Projects F¥91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
System Development Fees
Planned Landfill Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Source:
Landfill Tipping Fees
Net
Net
57,019,000
- 0 -
$ 10,205,000
$ - 0 -
Emerqenc¥ Me4ical Service
Planned EMS Unit Construction Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Source:
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill Fund)
Net
$ 978,000
978.000
$ - 0 -
Jail Housin~-'
Planned Jail Expansion Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Source:
None Identified
Additional Revenue Needed
$ 8,800,000*
-- Q -
8,800,000
Recommended Revenue Source:
7th Cent Sales Tax Revenue
8.800.000
Net $ - 0 -
Comments
Due to the cost of this project in any budget year, cash flow from the
pay-as-you-go I Mill Capital Revenue Fund is not sufficient to fund
this project without depleting the Fund.
CIE portion only, total jail project is $19M.
- 5 -
Librarie~
Planned Library Construction and Book
Collection FY91-95
Reserve for Impact Fee Eligible Projects
LESS Existing Revenue Source:
Library Impact Fee
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill Fund)
Trust Fund
Carry Forward
$ 6,581,000
2,397,000
197,000
2,517,000
Net
7,224,000
4.468.000
11,692,000
Government Bui14ing~
Planned Construction of Facilities FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
State Funds/Agriculture Building
Carry Forward
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill Fund)
99,000
3,812,000
3,009,000
Net
$ 6,920,000
Parks an4 Raoreation
Planned Parks Const. & Land Acquisition FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Sources:
Parks Impact Fee
Boating Improvement Program
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill Fund)
Developer Contribution
Carry Forward
$ 14,563,000
1,131,000
466,000
768,000
6,065,000
Additional Revenue Needed
Recommended Additional Revenue Source:
7th Cent Sales Tax/Regional Park
Net
$ 24,993,000
2,000,000
A general obligation bond issue is proposed as the alternative funding
source to the 7th Cent Sales Tax. Funds raised by the Bond issue would
be used to purchase land and facilities for a Regional Park.
Disapproval by the electorate of both referendums would result in a
lowering of the Level of Service Standard for this facility.
40 .455
- 6 -
Drainaq~
Planned Drainage & Water Mgmt. Projects FY91-95
LESS Existing Revenue Source:
Stormwater Utility Bonds** $ 18,638,000
Carry Forward 200,000
Net
IV. FINANCING PLkN $UKF.~Y
CIE Projects FY91-95
County Arterial &
Collector Roads
State Roads Network
Water & Sewer System
Solid Waste
Emergency Medical Service
Jail Expansion
Libraries
Government Buildings
Parks and Recreation
Drainage and Water Mgmt.
Totals
Projects
Funde4
$ 56,756,000
5,865,000
57,019,000
10,205,000
978,000
0
11,692,000
6,920,000
22,993,000
200,000
$172,628,000
Projects
Unfunde~
$ 50,139,000
35,735,000
0
0
0
8,800,000
o
0
2,000,000
18.638.000
$115,312,000
$ 18,838,000
Total
Pro4ects
$106,895,000
41,600,000
57,019,000
10,205,000
978,000
8,800,000
11,692,000
6,920,000
24,993,000
18.838.000
$287,940,000
Revenue Sources FY91-95
Gas Taxes
FDOT Funding
Carry Forward
State/Federal Grants
User Fees
Ad Valorem Taxes (1 Mill
Fund)
Stormwater Utility Bonds
Impact Fees
7th Cent Sales Tax
Miscellaneous
Totals
Zxisti2g
$ 24,922,000
4,865,000
12,594,000
1,230,000
10,205,000
6,850,000
0
109,997,000
0
1.965.000
$172,628,000
Subject to adoption by~&o~the ~t~C..~Aq 456
- 7 -
Propose4
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,638,000
0
96,674,000
$115,312,000
Revenues
$ 24,922,000
4,865,000
12,594,000
1,230,000
10,205,000
6,850,000
18,638,000
109,997,000
96,674,000
1.965.000
$287,940,000
Bum~ary
This proposed financing plan for the FY91-95 CIE of the Growth
Management Plan is based on the application of revenues from ten (10)
current and proposed sources to accomplish the $288M plan within the
twelve (12) policies outlined.
The first priority of the Collier County Capital Improvement Program
over the next five (5) years must be to complete projects in the
Capital Improvement Element. Additionally, there are numerous capital
projects of vital importance to the maintenance of high standards of
service to Collier citizens which are under construction, planned, or
yet to be developed that will need to be funded.
This CIE Financing Plan represents a prudent, achievable, and equitable
approach to secure the revenues needed for both CIE and non-CIE
projects. Back-up alternative revenue policies have also been
identified to ensure the Second Annual CIE Update remains financially
feasible in accordance with the requirements of Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. if
the 7th Cent Sales Tax does not pass at referendum in November, 1990.
Policy #3 of this plan iterates a commitment to maintain the Capital
Revenue Fund levy at a minimum of 1 Mill through FY95, while providing
the Board of County Commissioners with the latitude to provide property
tax relief by lowering the 1 Mill capital levy if the 7th Cent Sales
Tax is passed. This is possible because Chapter 212.055 F.S., while
prohibiting the substitution of the 7th Cent Sales Tax for an existing
tax, i.e., Capital Revenue Fund levy, does permit the Board to hold tax
dollars collected at a constant level equal to the amount collected in
the year the 7th Cent Sales Tax is enacted. This would allow a gradual
reduction in the millage needed to collect the constant tax dollars for
the Capital Revenue Fund due to the annual increase in the county-wide
total assessed value of the tax base, as f~llows:
Fiscal Assessed Value Capital Revenue
Year $ (Millions) Fund Millaqe
90/91 $ 12,775 1.0000
91/92 13,708 0.9310
92/93 15,332 0.8332
93/94 17,148 0.7450
94/95 19,179 0.6661
Tax Dollars
Collect~
$ 12,775,000
12,775,000
12,775,000
12,775,000
12,775,000
Under the two scenarios just described for the Capital Revenue Fund,
the following split of revenues would be realized:
Capital Revenue Fund FY91-95
LESS CIE Capital Projects
Available for Non-CIE,
CIE Additions and
Contingencies
Ratio CIE to Non-CIE
At Constant
i Mill
$ 78,142,000
6,850,000
71,292,000
At Constant
Dollars Collected
$ 63,875,000
6,850,000
57,025,000
11/89
- 8 -
It is important not to commit all projected revenue from the i Mill
Capital Revenue Fund to CIE projects. The proposed ratio under the
constant i Mill scenario allows for an average of $14.2M annually for
all capital demands not included in the CIE. To commit more of this
particular revenue source to the CIE would severely hamper the County's
ability to provide the many other non-CIE capital facilities not
covered by this plan.
A key component of this CIE Financing Plan, as iterated in Policy $2,
is the imposition of impact fees when applicable to the attainment of
growth related Level of Service Standards. Impact Fees currently in
place will provide 36% of the funds to complete the projects in this
plan.
The fact that the Second Annual CIE Update and this Financing Plan will
be adopted by the Board by Ordinance prior to the November, 1990 7th
Cent Sales Tax referendum makes the need for alternative revenues to
the 7th Cent Sales Tax imperative for this Financing Plan to be
financially feasible. These necessary alternative sources of revenue
are provided for in the adopted policies 1.2.8 through 1.2.12 of the
Second Annual CIE Update and policies 9 through 12 of this Financing
Plan.
Approved By
Collier County Finance Committee:
'~tstant County Mana~r
Director, Growt'fi lqana~[It~ent Depto
ance ~irector
/ .
' 'ec~or, Office of Mgmt. & Budget
- 9 -
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER )
I, JAMES C. GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foreGoinG is a true copy of:
Ordinance No. 90-74
which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
the 25th day of September, 1990, durinG ReGular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 4th
day of October, 1990.
JAMES C. GILES
Clerk of Courts and Cle~T~
Ex-officio to Board of '
County Commissioners
By: /s/Maureen Kenyon
Deputy Clerk
459