Loading...
Ordinance 92-087F �LG� ORDINANCE NO. 92--a7 1Z z 41 . yZ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE jARYOf STAZE ^�g1c3D 21 �?� 89-05, AN ORDINANCE ENACTING AND ESTABLIS A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTY, R FLORIDA PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT N COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT % N REGULATION ACT OF 1985 AND CHAPTER 9J-5, Q��L�e���j cc FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ICAI FOR REVIEWOFLOLGOVEMINIMUM M GOVERNMENT RCRITERIA COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE; BY sg i� CORRECTING, UPDATING, AND MODIFYING CERTAIN �95b£Z� COSTS, REVENUE SOURCES, SUPPORTING POLICIES, AND THE DATES OF CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES ENUMERATED IN THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEARS 1992/93 THROUGH 1996/97; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes also known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, also known as the Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance requires that Collier County correct, update, and modify costs, revenue sources, or the dates a== construction of facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared an Annual Update to the Capital Improvement Element of its Growth Management Plan (Ordinance No. 89-05) that takes into consideration the plans and financial resources of the County and of the Agencies of the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, Sections 163.3177(3)(b) and 163.3187(2) provide for annual updates of local government Capital Improvement Elements that consider corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan; or the dates of construction of any facilities enumerated in the Capital Improvements Element; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the boot M8 PAGE 11 —1— correcting, updating, and modifying of certain costs, revenue sources, and the dates of construction of facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element for capital projects in Fiscal Years 1992/93 through 1996/97 on October 1, 1992 and recommended that it be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners, as prepared, noting certain considerations and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public hearing on October 27, 1992; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: Update of Costs, Revenue Sources and Construction Dates of Facilities Enumerated in Capital Improvement Element of Growth Management Plan. This Ordinance, as described hereizil,-lshall be known and cited as the 1992 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update for Collier County, Florida. The Collier County 1992 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, consisting of goals, objectives, and policies; requirements for capital improvements implementation; and costs and revenues, shall be the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element Annual Update of 1992 and shall supersede any and all previous Capital Improvement Elements applicable to the unincorporated area of Collier County. SECTION TWO: Severability. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATED: AWEST: !. JAMES.C. GILE§CLERK r � .By: , ureen Kehyo eputy Clq'kk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: MarjozUe M. Student Assistant County Attorney —3— BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS fj .0 COUNTY,, FLORIDA QD p Chairman This Ordinance filed with the _• tees Cfff.;,�y�, and tB kncw'cdVemen that feiv d t i daoY awry C EXHIBIT A CAPITAL IMPROVEXENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment BOOK C58 PAGE 14 I ORo11tANCE 110. 91--94 All ORDIIIANCE AMENDING COLLIER COVNTY OROIIIANCE a 9-OS, AN ORDII-MICE ENACTIIIG Alto ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MAIIAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COMITY, FLOntok PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND MID DEVELOPMENT REGULATIOII ACT OF 1965 AND CHAPTER 9J-S, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAIts AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCES BY CORRECTING, UPDATIIIO, AND MODIFYING CERTAIII COSTS, REVENUE SOURCES, SVPPORTIIIG POLICIES, AIFO THE DATES OF cousTRVCTION OF FACILITIES ENUMERATED Ill THE COLLIER COMITY GROWTH MAtIAGEMEIIT PLAN CAPITAL IMPP.OVEME?IT ELEMENT FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS III FISCAL YEARS 1991/93 THROUGH 1995/961 PROVIDING FOR SEVERAerLITY; AMID PROVID1110 At$ EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 161, Part It. Florida Statutes also known as the Local Government Comprehensive Plannlnq• and Land Development Regulation Act of 1995 and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, also known'as the Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive" flans and Determination of Compliance requires that Collier County correct, update, and modify costs, revenue sources, or the dates of eonstructidn of facilities enumerated in the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared an.Annual Update to the Capital Improvement Element of -its Growth Management Plan (ordinance Ito. 89-05) that takes into consideration the plan* and financial resources of the County and of the Agencies of the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, Chapter 161, Part II, Florida Statutes, Sections 161.1177(7)(b) and 16I.2187(I) provide for annual updates of local government Capitol Improvement Elements that consider corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costal revenue sources; acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan; or the dates of construction of any facilities enumerated In the Capital Improvements Element; and wIIF.REA8, the Collier County Planning Commission in a manner prescribed by law did hold a public hearing concerning the correcting, updating, and modifying of certain costs, revenue sources, and the dates of construction of facilities enumerated in -1- im Q5.8 PAGE 16 fan I the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element for capital projects In fiscal Yearn 1991/92 through 1995/99 on September S, 1991 and recommended that it be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners, as prepared, noting certain considerations and recommendation.; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did take action In the wanner prescribed by law and did hold a public hearing on September 23, 1991, and October 1, 1991; and ` WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements or law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BC IT ORDAINEO BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAt LCMN ON Update of Coats, atwenw Sources and Construction 1 Pates "of Facilities Enumerated in Capital Improvement Element of Growth Management Plan. This Ordinance, as described herein, shall be known and (f cited as the 1991 Capital Improvement Element annual Update for Collier County, Florida. The Collier County 1991 Capital Improvement Element Annual Update, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, consisting of gos,ll, objectives, and policies; requirements for capital improvements implamentatloni and costs and revenues, shall be the Collier County Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element Annual Update of 1991 and shall supersede any and all previous Capital Improvement Elements applicable to the unincorporated area of Collier County. SECTION T1/Ot Beverablllty. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held Invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, i such portion shall be dammed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. -2- BOOK 058 PAGE 17 3 ORDINANCE 110. 9t-_]lam_ All ORDIHAt10E ANF.IIUINC COLLIER COUItTY ORDIHANCE 110. 89-05, AS AME11DF.D, FOR THE UIIINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY TO AME110 THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMF.HT ELEHEIIT, POLICIES, TO AME11D CAPITAL IMPROVf.M911T ELEMEHT COSTS' Alt0 REVFl1UF.5, TO UPIIATF. COSTS Atli) REVENUES: TO AMF.HD THE SCHEDULE of CAPITAL IMPROVEMCHTS BY ADDING PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996t TO AMEHO THE FUTURE LAHO USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE DESICHATI011 DESCRIPTIOttS POLICIES, FUTURE LAHO USE MAP SEP.IES DEPICTIHG THE IMMOKALEE URBAII AREA, PLAIITATIOH ISWID VRBAM AREA, AND FURLIC FACILITIES Alto NATURAL RESOURCES SITESt TO AMCHD THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMEHT, EXISTING COt10ITIOl1S AllV FUTURE COHOITICOS MAPS, TABLES, POLICIES AND TEXT; TO AMEND THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATI011 ELEMENT TEXTI TO AMEND THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELE11EHT (SANITARY SEWER` SUB-ELEMEtIT) OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AHO MAP: TO AMEHO PUBLIC FACILITIES EIXIIEHT (POTABLE WATER SUB-Et-EMENT) OI1JECTIVES, POLICIES Alto MAP: TO AIIEHO THE RECREATIOH ANO OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, MAP Alto TABLES; TO AMEHO TIIF C011SERVATI011 AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELE11E11T, POLICIESt TO AME11D THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN, L.AIID USE DESIGIIATI011 DESCRIPTI0NS Alto FUTURE LAZID USE MAP( TO AMEND THE GOLOEIt GATE AREA MASTER _. PLAIT, LAND USE DESICIIATI011 DESCRIPTIOtIS SECTION: PROVIDItic FOR SEVERABILITYt A110 PROVIDIIIG All EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 19891 and WHEREAS, Collier County has held public hearings to provide for and encourage public participation throughout the 1991 plan amendment process: and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit the 1991 Growth Management Plan Amendments to the State Land Planning Agency for preliminary review on October 15, 19911 and WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency did review and make written objections to certain sections of the proposed Plan and transmitted the same In writing to Collier County within the time provided by laws and WHEREAS, Collier County ties one hundred twenty days from receipt of the written objections from the State Land Planning Agency to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plant and - 1 - b0bK 058 PAGE 19 . i WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission in a manner prescribed by law did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the amendments to the Growth Management Plan on April 30, I992 and May 7, 1992 and recommended their adoption by the Board of County Commissionerst and WIIER£AS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the monnet prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the amendments to the Growth Management Plsn on May 19, 1992 and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedurali requirements of law have been mints and NOW, THEREFORE, RE 1T ORUAIIICD BY T11C BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COV11TY, FLORIDA, thats SECTION DIIE1 ADOPTIO11 OF 1991 GROWTH MAt1AGEM£;IT PWI A?IENDMENTS This Ordinance as described herein, shall be known as the 1991 Crowth Management Plan Amendment jar Collier County, Florida. The Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. consists 1 of amendments to the following: the Capital Improvement Element Policies, Capital Improvement Element Update for Costs and Revenues, Capital Improvement Element Schedule of Capital Improvements; Future Land Use Element 'Land Use Designation Descriptions, Policies, and Map Series; Traffic Circulation Element Existing Conditions and Future Conditions Map, Tables, Policies and Text: Public Facilities Element (Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element) Objectives, Policies and Mapt Public facilities Element (Potable Water Sub -Element) Objectives, Policies and Map; Recreation and Open Space Element, Maps and Tables; Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Pollcles; Immokalee Area Master Plan, Land Use Designation Descriptions Section, Immokalee Area Future Land Use Mapt and Golden Cate Area Master Plan, Land Use Designation Descriptions Section. - 2 - 600K Q50 PACE 20 r ` TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION • II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES + III. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects Drainage Projects EMS Projects Jail Projects Library Buildings projects Government Buildings Projects Parks Projects Water Projects Sewer Projects - Landfill Projects + IV. COST AND REVENUES + V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION VI. ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Collier County Third Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities + Indicates portions to be adopted BOOK 058pta 22 CIE - 21 CIE - 22 CIE - 31 CIE - 33 CIE - 34 CIE - 35 CIE - 37 CIE - 36 CIE - 41 CIE - 47 CIE - 51 CIE - 52 CIE - 54 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix 0 C I. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the new provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to It . consider the needs for and location of public facilities .. " (Section 163.3177(3)' Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) is supposed to identify public facilities that will be required during the next five or more years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase "level of service" as " an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by . a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). l C) BOOK 058 PAG[ 23 VE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for three categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards.for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, emergency medical service, other government buildings, and dependent fire districts. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the county's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Category C includes those facilities operated by Federal, State, and municipal governments, independent districts, and private organizations. The standards for levels of service of Category C facilities shall be advisory only, and shall not apply to the development orders issued by the County or the County's annual budget. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such CIE - 1 BOOK 058 PAGE 24 0 items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q- (SxD) -I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, ;r S is the standard for level of service, �! D is the demand, such as the population, and ,) I is the inventory of existing facilities. A. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. / B. The County Commission will review all rezone requests and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall county -wide density_or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q.s (S x D) - I, and the overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request or FLUE amendment that significantly impacts either: (1) a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate within one year at an unacceptable Level of Service or; (2) the BEER high range population projections for the variable "D", unless one or more of the following simultaneously occur: 1. Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; 2. The adopted population standard (BEER high range projection) used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q - (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; 3. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. / Amended May 19, 1992 CIE - 2 500K 05.8 PAGE 25 tg C. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased county -wide population greater than 5% of the BEBR high range population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 5% of the Level of Service C peak hour volume of an impacted roadway. / D. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. 2. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling an renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Manager.- 3. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: a. the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and b. the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this -Growth Management Plan. I Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvements Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this'policy. Policy 1.1.3: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where Cf Amended May 19, 1992 CITE - 3 bou 058 PAGE 26 .M An 0M applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1.1.4: Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvements Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved orders permittIng new development, 3. new orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new orders permitting new developments. D. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. CIE - 4 BOOK 0,JO PAGE 27 4P 1W 1W •'FRi•�' Policy 1.1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Category A Public Facilities Al County Roads A1.1 County arterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated " " below on the basis of peak hour, peak season traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads From - To Airport Pulling Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road to I-75 A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season on all other County arterial and collector roads, however any section of road may operate at Level of Service "E" for a period not to exceed two fiscal years following the determination of Level of Service "E" in order to provide the Bounty with time to restore Level of Service "D" by making appropriate improve- ments. Development orders may be issued during the two year period to the extent their issuance is consistent with Policies 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 of this Element. A2 State and Federal Roads: EXIB�TING TRANSITIONINQ RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA I-75 C D g US 41 C D SR-84 B_Q D SR-951 - E2 SR-29 ep SR-82 ep A3 County Surface Water Management Systems: • A3.1 Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. * A3.2 Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as * Amended February 5, 1991 CIE - 5 aou 058 PAGE 28 lor W_ listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. A4 County Potable Water Systems: A4.1 County systems 135 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for non-residential A4.2 City of Naples - 150 gallons per capita per day A4.3 Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. AS County Sanitary sewer Systems: A5.1 County systems: 100 gallons per day per capita plus 21% for non-residential A5.2 City of Naples - 150 gallons per capita per day A5.3 Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. A6 County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: A6.1 4r55 1..29 tons of Solid Waste per capita per year A6.2 Two years of landfill lined cell disposal capacity at present C fill rates A6.3 Ten years of landfill raw land capacity at present fill rates A7 County Parks and Recreation Facilities: A7.1 Regional Park land - 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. A7.2 Community Park land - 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. A7.3 Recreation facilities - $122.00 capital investment per capita (at current cost) Category B Public Facilities: B1 County Library Buildings : 0.33 square feet per capita B2 County Library Collection : 1.0 books per capita FY91/92 '. 1.05 books per capita FY92/93 1.10 books per capita FY93/94 1.15 books per capita FY94/95 " 1.20�per cavita FY95/96 1.25 books per capita FY96 97 ; B3 County Jail 070033 0.0024 beds per capita =;1 B4 County Emergency Medical 0.00006 EMS units per capita Service CIE - 6 doox 05.8 Pxcc 29 4W B5 County other Government Buildings B6 County dependent fire districts: 86.1 Isle of Capri District B6.2 Ochopee District Category C Public Facilities: C1 Municipal Streets: C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 I ow : 2.58 square feet per capita - 0.00097 apparatus and stations per capita - 0.00057 apparatus and stations per capita C1.1 City of Naples - not to exceed annual average capacity of "C" for all streets C1.2 Everglades City - annual average of "A" for all collectors Federal and State Lands Surface Water Management: C2.1 Federal Lands Surface Water Management - to protect Natural Resources, development allowed will be designed so drainage will have no adverse impact on'resources. (No measurable standard) C2.2 State Lands Surface Water Management - leased lands for agriculture to have best management practices per clean water act. (No measurable standard) Municipal surface Water Managements C3.1 City of Naples - maintain existing level of service New development to conform with County surface water C3.2 Everglades City - 10 year - 24 hour storm event Municipal Potable Water Systems: C4.1 Everglades City - 135 gallons per capita per day, plus 21% for non-residential Municipal sanitary Sewer Systems: C5.1 Everglades City - 100 gallons per capita per day plus 21% for non-residential Private solid Waste Disposal Facilities: C6.1 City of Naples - 1.55 tons per capita. C6.2 Everglades City - 1.55 tons per capita CIE - 7 BOOK 058PAGE 30 *w- W C7 Federal and State Parks: C7.1 Federal Parks: Everglades National Park, Big Cypress (\ Preserve - to protect environmentally sensitive lands. Boundaries set by legislation. (No measurable standard) C7.2 State Park: Policy is not to develop more than 20%. (No measurable standard) C7.3 State Recreation Standard is of no particular size, Area: physical development limited to no more than 50% of land area. C7.4 State Preserves: to maintain exceptional objects to conditions. Physical development limited to no more than 5% of land area. (No measurable standard) C7.5 State Museum: no standard for size C7.6 State Ornamental no standard for size Garden: ca Municipal Parks and Recreation Facilities: C8.1 City of Naples: a. Community Parks 2 acres/ 1,000 population b. Neighborhood Parks = .1 acre-/-1,000 population c. Beaches = 1 mile /25,000 population d. Recreation Facilities Level of Service Standards: 1. Basketball Courts _ l/ 5,000 population 2. Baseball Fields 1/ 5,000 population 3. Beach Access Points = 1/ 1,000 population 4. Boat Ramps = 1/ 6,000 population 5. Bike Trails l/ 1,500 population 6. Community Centers = 1/ 8,000 population 7. Football Fields 1/10,000 population 8. Horseshoe Pits 1/ 2,500 population 9. Meeting Rooms = 1/ 6,000 population 10. Pavilions 1/ 5,000 population 11. Picnic Areas 1/ 5,000 population 12. Play Areas 1/ 6,000 population 13. Racquetball Courts 1/ 2,500 population 14. Shuffleboard Courts = 1/ 2,500 population 15. Swimming Pools = 1/25,000 population 16. Tennis Courts 1/ 2,000 population 17. Volleyball Courts = 1/ 4,000 population CIE - 8 BOOK 058 PAGE 31 C C. RM C8.2 C9 C10 a. b. C. C11 Everglades City: a. Community Parks 1.25 acres/534 population b. Recreation Facilities: 1. Basketball Courts - 1/534 population 2. Baseball Fields - 1/534 population 3. Bike Trails - 1/534 population 4. Community Centers - 1/534 population 5. Football Fields - 1/534 population 6. Pavilions - 1/534 population 7. Picnic Areas - 1/534 population 8. Play Areas - 1/534 population 9. Tennis Courts - 1/534 population Private Recreation Facilities: a. No standard in industry b. Collier County Usable Open Space Requirement Ordinance 182-2 Sec. 7.27 1. Planned Residential Developments - 60% of gross area shall be devoted to usable open space 2. Commercial, Industrial, 8 Mixed Purpose Development - at least 30% of gross area shall be devoted to open space 3. Dedication of usable open space - Maximum of 8% of gross project site Public schools: R - 5 Elementary School - 832 students/building 6 - 8 Middle School - 1100 students/building 9 - 12 High School - 2200 students/building Public Health Facilities: County Government Buildings standard of 2.58 sq. ft. per capita inclbdes the County's public health facilities. CIE - 9 WK 058F:Gf 32 W14 Win "W FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based an economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: `. Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed*c public facilities. Existing development shall..pmy for some or all r facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by +; grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, cr the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non -enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, jail, other government buildings, and dependent fire districts) shall be financed from current assets (pay-as-you-go financing) except as otherwise provided in this policy. Public facilities financed by non -enterprise funds shall not be financed by debt unless such borrowing is the only financing technique available that will enable the County to provide facility capacity sufficient to meet standards for levels of service concurrent with new development. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non -enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a CIE - 10 r, aooK �58 P��E 33 4W 4W 4W capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five year capital improvements plan or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. Policy 1.2.6: Prior to fiscal year 1989-90, the County shall adopt a revised Road Impact Fee Ordinance requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation and Library improvements necessitated by such development. I--Pe�iey-�rEret Prier-to-fiscal-year-&99E-93-the-eeunty-shall-adept-a-Stormxater Rnn-off-7Ttilfty-Pee-Systen-er-alternative-revenue-source-in-order-to fund-drainage-faellity-improvements I Policy 1.2.98: The County will issue Revenue Bonds in FY94 and-PY96 secured by a non -ad valorem covenant to budget and appropriate to fund the revenue shortfall for County road improvements identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. I Policy 1.2.3e2: The County will use the short-term Commercial Paper Program to advance funds for construction of State road projects Nos. 447 50 and 51 identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements pending pay -backs to the County from FDOT. I Policy 1.2.111k: The primary source of funding for CIE Project 1400, County Jail, will be a General Obligation Bond referendum for approval of a bond issue to be financed by a new ad valorem tax.. i Amended May 19, 1992 CIE - it BOOK 058 PA6E 34 L; 0 Policy 1.2. **,Ut If, for any reason, the County cannot adopt one or -more of the revenue C sources identified in Policies 1.2.6 through 1.2.10 of this Element and said revenue sources are identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: A. Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; B. Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; C. Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non -Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. D. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan / amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be (` obtained. E. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. / policy 1.2.6912: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13t. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current Bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State -shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half -cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. / Amended May 19, 1992 CIE - 12 BOOK 058 PAGE 35 y.� I 3 PUBLIC EXPENDITURES : COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore an waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infra- structure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of -the coastal high hazard area. In addition, re-evaluation of existing zoning on unimproved properties that are inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element will be undertaken as part of the zoning re-evaluation program specified in Policy 3.1X of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and by December 31, 1992, develop a program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. CIE - 13 BOOK 058 PAGE 36 A L OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.11 The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the "Requirements for Capital Improvements Implementation" section of this Capital Improvements Element. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any r,• calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small'stale development activities. C. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of C Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1.4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a building permit. The County may also include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B 3) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). Policy 1.4.4s The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of building permits, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public CIE - 14 500% 058 PAGE 37 • ' i Y_i_.1 i . Y 1Y } OBJECTIVE 1.5: In order to coordinate land use decisions and facility planning by the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, the County shall adopt a "Concurrency Management System" Ordinance for the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to development in order to achieve and maintain adopted standards for levels of service, and to exceed the adopted standards when possible. Policy 1.5.1: Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through September 30, 1994, the concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards, of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impact of the development occurs. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. a C. The required facilities are the•subjectt'of a binding contract executed for the construction of those facilities at the time y. a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the County's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction. E. The construction of facilities required to accommodate the impact of development occurring before October 1, 1994 is scheduled in the County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October 1, 1994. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be based on a realistic, financially o feasible program of funding from existing revenue sources and ? shall be adopted as a part of this Growth Management Plan. 1. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any Category A facility in the ti Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to 1 maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any development order issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly conditional so that the permit shall be suspended and no further CIE - 16 600K 058 rkcc 39 C C M development shall be carried out in the event any of the following occur without a corresponding plan amendment: a. The required facilities are delayed, deferred, or removed from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements. b. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the Schedule of Capital Improvements. C. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements. F. The construction of required facilities scheduled in the County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October 1, 1994 will not be delayed, deferred or removed from the Capital Improvement Element if the facilities have been relied upon for issuance of a development order. Policy 1.5.2: Effective October 1, 1994, the concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards of this Growth-Hanagement Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time the building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place and operational when the impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the County's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction. Policy 1.5.3t Beginning with the effective date of Plan Implementation through September 30, 1994, the concurrency requirement of the Traffic Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: CIE - 17 t00% 05.8 PAcc 40 0 FI M N A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction of required facilities has been included in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the -facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contact for their construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS below the adopted standard (i.e., Los standard is "D" peak hour, peak season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak season). E. The construction of the facility required to accommodate the impact of development occurring before October 1, 1994 is included in the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the County's current five (5) year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted as a pat of this Growth Management Plan prior to t October 1, 1994. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, �.• defer or delay construction of any road project in the Schedule of Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard. Any development order issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly conditional so that the permit shall be suspended and no further development shall be carried out in the event any of the following occur without a corresponding *! plan amendment: 1. The required facility is delayed, deferred, or removed from the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the Schedule of Capital Improvements. 2. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the Schedule of Capital Improvements. 3. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the County's adopted t. Schedule of Capital Improvements or the State's Five (5) . Year Work Program. F. The construction of required facilities scheduled in the s County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October 1, 1994 will not be delayed, deferred or removed from the CIE — is 500K 05$ PAU 41 Capital Improvement Element if the facilities have been '. relied upon for issuance of a development order. Policy 1.5.4: Effective October 1, 1994, the concurrency requirements of the Traffic Circulation Level of Service Standard of this Growth Management Plan would be met if any of the following conditions of an established Concurrency Management System are met: A. The required facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued, or a building permit is issued subject to the condition that the necessary facilities will be in place when he impacts of the development occur. B. The required facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. C. The required facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of these facilities at the time a building permit is issued. D. The construction -of required facilities has been included in the State or local Government's adopted budget at the time a building permit is issued even though the facilities are not yet the subject of a binding contract for their construction, provided that the level of service (LOS) of any road does not fall beyond the next lower LOS.below the adopted standard (i.e., Los standard is "D" peak hour, peak season and service does not fall below "E" peak hour, peak season). E. The construction of the required facility is included in the State's Five (5) Year Work Program or the County's current five (5) year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted as a part of this Growth Management Plan and: 1. The Board of County Commissioners have made an express finding, after a public hearing, that the current five (5) year capital improvement schedule is based on a realistic, financially feasible program of funding from existing revenue sources; and 2. The level of service (LOS) on all roads serving the development will not, at any time, operate below peak hour, peak season LOS "E"; and 3. The level of service (LOS) on any road serving the development will not operate at peak hour, peak season LOS "E" for a period of more than two (2) years; and 4. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project in the Schedule Cof Capital Improvements which is needed to maintain the CIE - 19 b00% Q5$ PAGf 42 �t adopted level of service standard. Any development permit issued pursuant to a concurrency finding under this section is expressly conditioned so that the permit shall be suspended and no further development shall be carried out in the event any of the following occur without a corresponding plan amendment: a. The required facility is delayed, deferred or removed from the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year work program; b. Annual funding is insufficient to maintain the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year program; C. The level of service on any road serving the development operates below peak hour, peak season LOS "E"; d. The level of service on any road serving the development operates at peak hour, peak season LOS "E" for a period of more than two (2) years; and e. Construction of the required facility or facilities is not undertaken in accordance with the five (5) year capital improvement schedule or the State's five (5) year work program__ Policy 1.5.5: + on or before the time mandated for the adoption of land development t+{ regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any «� amendments thereto, the County shall implement, through the adoption of an ordinance, a Concurrency Management System and a monitoring program. A Y. -ir •f CIE - 20 S.. REOUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. CIE - 21 bou i 58 PAGE 44 CATEGORY A ROAD PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Woo) 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Project----- ----- --------------------------------------- 600 - 1 111th Avenue North 600 US 41 - Vanderbilt Drive 1.2 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 2 Airport Pulling Road (CR 31) (COMPLETED)* Radio Road - Golden Gate Parkway 1.4 miles: add 2 lanes 3 Airport -Pulling Road (COMPLETED)* 100 US 41 - Radio Road 1.8 miles: add 2 lanes o n 4 Davis Boulevard (SR 84) (COMPLETED)* '0 ~ to Santa Barbara Boulevard - County Barn Road CA 1.4 miles: add 2 lanes N 5 Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 800 3940 CR 851 - CR 31 1.4 miles: add 2 lanes and G-� grade separation at Airport z Road (FUTURE) ' 6 Immokalee Road (CR 846) (COMPLETED)* 200 US 41 - I-75 3.5 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 8 Immokalee Road (CR 846) 150 325 I-75 - CR 951 3.4 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 100 4740 200 475 1 1 CATEGORY A ROAD PROJECTS: COLLIER COU14TY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 10 Isles of Capri Road (CR 951) 5600 US 41 - Rattlesnake Hammock Road 3.4 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 11 Isles of Capri Road (CR 951) 250 5250 SR 84 - Rattlesnake Hammock Road 3.1 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes a 5-1 12 Isles of Capri Road (SR 951) (COMPLETED) -7 0 US 41 - Marco Bridge R-o-W Acquisition 00 a13 Isles of Capri Road (CR 9S1) (COMPLETED)* w 23rd Ave.. S.W. - Golden Gate Boulevard Q) 2.8 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 14 Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) (COMPLETED)* X500 US 41 - CR 31 2.1 miles: add 2 lanes and interchange at Airport Road 15 Radio Road (COMPLETED)* CR 31 - Santa Barbara Blvd. 3.2 miles; replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes ----97 Total 5600 5500 $950 10450 1 CATEGORY A ROAD PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project 92-93 ----- 93-94 ----- 94-93 ----- 95-96 ----- 96-97 ----- Total ----- ------------------------------------- 525 25 Vanderbilt Drive (CR 901) 525 111th - Bonita Beach Road 3.9 miles: replace 2 lanes; add 2 lanes 26 Aestclock Road (COMPLETED)* 50 50 Carson Road - SR 29 1 mile: build 2 lanes 27 Major Reconstruction 307 630 628 600 2165 in-house major road reconstruction at various locations 10 o n 28 Traffic Signals 490 605 630 600 2325 ' major installation at ' Cyr N various locations 06 3750 a 31 Bonita Beach Road 800 2950 Vanderbilt Drive to County - line on 1.6 miles: add 1 lane (� in Lee County) 32 Santa Barbara Boulevard 50 1400 3150 4600 Davis Blvd to Rattlesnake - Hammock Road 2 miles: build 4 lanes 33 County Barn Road 350 250 3200 3800 Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake - Hammock Road 2 miles; build 4 lanes 34 Advanced ROW Acquisition 200 200 200 200 800 Gn 1_� CATEGORY A ROAD PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IHPROVEKENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 59 North lith Street (Immokalee) 25 Roberts Avenue to SR 29 .25 miles; 2 lanes 00 interim Loan Pay Back 13750 Pay-off to be funded from proceeds of FY94 Revenue Bond Tccnra COUNTY ROADS SUBTOTAL 20985 54237 9 96-97 Total 125 150 13750 12610 8536 12925 109293 Notes: • Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of this Fourth Annual CIE Update b Amendment by the BCC. 1 E -Gw9 - _ "ff+_,�rz x .. .:�"'Ts _ _ x is _ _ �., _ • ra ,..•,. '� -a,4t: nt. - - �. CATEGORY A DRAINAGE PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project______-N_____r_________-'_M_ 92 93 93_94 9;N95 95 96 96=9? Total 299 Naples Park Drainage (DELETE) TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O O ]S M C.n V6 v 9 Notes: • Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of this Fourth Annual CIE Update i Amendment by the BCC. CATEGORY A EMS PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total 301 Lely/East Tamiami EMS (COMPLETED)* Station and Vehicle: Lely/East Tamiami Trail area 302 Golden Gate Parkway 264 264 EMS station and vehicle: Golden Gate Parkway - Airport Road 303 System Status Float Unit 366 366 304 EMS Station and Vehicle: 366 366 Location to be determined H based on need G oa t 305 EMS Station and vehicle: 366 366 Location to be determined W w based on need 306 EMS Station and Vehicle: 366 366 Location to be determined based on need _ TOTAL 264 346 366 366 366 1,728 Notes: * Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of. this Fourth Annual CIE Update & Amendment by the BCC. i top CATEGORY A LIBRARY BUILDINGS PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project 92-93 93-94 ------------------------------------- ----- ----- 94-95 --~- 95-96 ---_- 96-97 Total ----- ----- 500 Headquarters Addition - (COMPLETED)* 26,575 sq. ft. addition 501 East Naples Branch (COMPLETED)* Construction of 6600 sq.ft. branch library 502 Collier North Branch 344 344 3000 sq.ft. addition 503 Marco Island Branch 40 409 449 g 0 3300 sq.ft. addition On 504 Library HQ Renovation (DELETE) Renovate/remodel upon completion of Project , , 1500 •• w 505 Immokalee Branch 30 288 35 353 Cil 3000 sq.ft. addition 00 " 506 Golden Gate Branch (COMPLETED)* 3000 sq.ft. addition 1 507 Vineyards Branch Library 50 776 826 10,000 sq.ft. Branch Library TOTAL 384 439 338 811 1972 Notes: * Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the tine of the adoption of. this Fourth Annual CIE Update 6 Amendment by the BCC. CATEGORY A GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total 600 New Courthouse (COMPLETED)* 115,000 sq.ft. finished; 23,000 sq.ft. to be completed at a future time 601 New Health Building (COMPLETED)* 50,000 sq.ft. finished + 25,000 sq.ft. to be finished in FY91/92.to house health related activities, Social Services, o Veterans Services and Public n Services Administration td 604 Building A Expansion (DELETE) OPO 15,000 sq.ft. expansion of warehouse + day care facility 605 New Agriculture Center (COMPLETED)* 12,000 sq.ft. new structure for agricultural activities/ emergency operating center 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: * Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of this Fourth Annual CIE Update i Amendment by the BCC. I 1 1 CATEGORY A WATER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEKENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------------------------------- -2_g3 9 3-94 94-95 95-96 ---- ----- ----- 96-97 Total ----- ----- 801 Rattlesnake Hammock Road 20" (COMPLETED)* L.F. of 20" Water Main 802 County Barn Road 16" (COMPLETED)* 5900 L.F. of 16" Water Main 803 Davis Boulevard 16" (COMPLETED)* 11070 L.F. of 16" Water Main 804 Davis Boulevard 20" (COMPLETED)* 2640 L.F. of 20" Water Main o' 0 805 gist Avenue 12" Intercon. (COMPLETED)* H200 L.F. of 12" Water Main , Ul 1 806 7th Street 12" Intercon. (COMPLETED)* *. 100 L.F. of 12" Water Main r 808 Audubon County Club 16" (COMPLETED)* G7 5230 L.F. of 16" Water Main ►ice 809 Carica Road Pumping (COMPLETED)* Storage Tank Pumping Facilities , 810 Carica Road Tank (COMPLETED)* Water Storage Tank and Land replacement costs to Naples 811 Land for North Reg. (COMPLETED)* Treatment Land Acquisition CATEGORY A WATER PROJECTS: COLLIER COQNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT WOO Project92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total ------------------------------ ----- ----- -- -- ----- ----- 826 6th Street 12" (COMPLETED)* 6600 L.F. of 12" Water Main 827 Gulfshore i Vanderbilt 16" (COMPLETED)* 12585 L.F. of 16" Water Main 828 Coral Reef Wellfield Phase I (DELETE) Phase I of Master Plan Project 829 North County Reg. Treatment (COMPLETED)* Plant Construction of North County o Regional Water Treatment Plant 0 830 Immokales Road 36" (DELETE) to 10560 L.F. of 36" Water Main US 831 CR 951 36" (COMPLETED)* 10560 L.F. of 36" Water Main 832 Immokalee Road 24" (COMPLETED)* 7920 L.F. of 24" Water Main 833 Immokalee Road 20" (COMPLETED)* 5280 L.F. of 20" Water Main 834 Quail Creek PUD 16" (COMPLETED)* 7920 L.F. of 16" Water Main 835 Immokalee Road 16" (COMPLETED)* 2640 L.F. of 16" Water Main 836 Immokalea Road 12" (COMPLETED)* 5280 L.F. of 12" Water Main CATEGORY A WATER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------------------------------- 92-93 93-94 94-93 95-96 96-97 Total ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- , 837 Livingston Road Extension 1699(COMPLETED)* 23600 L.F. of 16" Water Main 838 1.5 MG Elevated Tank (DELETE) 839 Old US 41 16" (COMPLETED)* 1800 L.F. of 16" Water Main 840 Pine Ridge Road 16" (COMPLETED)* 7920 L.F. of 16" Water Main 841 Davis Boulevard 16" (COMPLETED)* 0 6450 L.F. of 16" Water Main ~� 842 5 MG Ground Tank (DELETE) ►ni Storage Tank i Pumping pip °0 Facilities at Collier DRI + + 843 12" Main at Pine Ridge Road (COMPLETED) * Q� 8000 L.F. of 12" Water Main 844 12" Main at Pine Ridge Road (COMPLETED)* 2800 L.F. of 12" Water Main 846 12" Water Main at US 41 (DELETE) 6000 L.F. of 12" Water Main 847 12" Water Main at Immokalee (COMPLETED)* Road 5280 L.F. of 12" Water Main 848 12" Water Main at US 41 (DELETE) 8300 L.F. of 12" Water Main 849 North County Wellfield - (DELETE) Phase II n CATEGORY A WATER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SOW' Project 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 850 Golden Gate Wellfield (COMPLETED)* Expansion 851 Raw Booster Station (COMPLETED)* 852 20'' Main on Goodlette Road (COMPLETED)* Extension 10560 L.F. of 20" Main 853 16" Loop Main on Palm Drive (COMPLETED)* a 11450 L.F. of 16" Main 0 854 20" Main - US 41 North (COMPLETED)* H 8000 L.F. of 20" Main from Gl N Immokalee Road to Wiggins i Pass Ab 855 12" Main .on Radio Road (COMPLETED)* 21120 L.F. of 12" Main 00.• between Commercial Drive and Davis Blvd. 856 16" Main - Livingston Road (COMPLETED)* ; to Wyndemere 8000 L.F. of 16" Main from Pine Ridge Road to Wyndemere 857 16•• Main on Santa Barbara (COMPLETED)* 5280 L.F. of 16" Main from Davis Blvd. to Radio Road 858 36" Main on CR 951 (COMPLETED)* 15840 L.F. of 36" Main from Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake 96-97 Total 1 . _ _ ..4 ,++�.4.5' - `..(h rrir _.. rv.ia�� '^•A; :y' yZgl♦.{„'� .{': i•'.w _.'..?'. CATEGORY A SEWER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT MOO) Project 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total 901 North County Expansion (COMPLETED)* Design & Construction of Wastewater Facility and Effluent Disposal 902 East and South Naples (COMPLETED)* Collection System Construction of the Facility 904 South County Reg. Treatment (COMPLETED)* o Facility 0 906 Utility Administration (DEFERRED) a~a Building Design and Construction ' 907 South County Pump, Mains & (COMPLETED)* Disposal �i Pump Station, Transmission O Mains and Effluent Disposal System 90e 89' Force Hain (COMPLETED)* t Pump Station 15 to Pump L Station 20 10800 L.F. of 8" Force Main 909 12" Force Main 1100 1100 Pump Station 19 to Pump Station 20 11300 L.F. of 12" Force Hain 910 loll Force Main - Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED)* Pump Station 11 to Santa Barbara .2400 L.F. of low Force Main CATEGORY A SEWER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 3-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------------------------------- 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total ----- -»_- »_» ----- ----- ----- 911 Davis Blvd. Pump Stat.No.il (COMPLETED)* Design and Construction 912 loll Force Main Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED)* Pump Station 14 to Pump Station 11 7800 L.F. of 10" Force Main 913 Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED)* Pump Station No. 14 Design and Construction c 914 2011 Force Main CR.951/US 41 (COMPLETED)* I Pump Station 18 to Pump :~a Station 1 11400 L.F. of 20" Force Main m 915 Pump Station No. 18 (COMPLETED)* Design and Construction H916 South County Reg. Treatment (COMPLETED)* Facility Expansion Design and Construction of ti 8 MGD Facility Expansion 917 North County Reg. Treatment 2500 2500 Facility Expansion Design and Construction of 3 MGD Facility Expansion 918 20" Force Main (COMPLETED)* Rattlesnake -Hammock Road - CR 951 to Polly Avenue 11400 L.F. of 20" Force Main CATEGORY A SEWER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ----------------------------- 92-93-94-95 95-96 -- -- 919 Rattlesnake -Hammock Road 700 Pump Station 20 - Design and Construction 920 Pump Station No. 16 (COMPLETED)* CR 951 - Design and Construction 921 12" Force Main (COMPLETED)* CR 951 - Pump Station 16 to Pump Station 18 a 10800 L.F. of 12" Force Main 0 O 922 North County Pump Station (DELETE) Telemetry System - Radio Telemetry System e 923 North County Wastewater (DELETE) Treatment Plant Operations Building Office and Laboratory 924 North County (COMPLETED)* t Master Pump Station 1.10 925 Pelican Bay Improvement (COMPLETED)* District 47520 L.F. of Force Main and 2 Pump Stations 926 Immokalee Road Sewer/ (COMPLETED)* Effluent System Force Main i effluent line from N. Plant to Quail Creek 96-97 Total 700 F� Cr.7 CATEGORY A SEWER PROJECTS: COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT WOO) Project 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total 927 Master Pump Stations 1.03 & (COMPLETED)* 1.07 2 pump stations on Immokalee Road 928 24" Force Main from 1.06 to (COMPLETED)* 1.07 - 20,000 L.F. of Force Main from Airport Road to Orange Blossom Drive H 929 Pump Station-3.17 700 700 �y US 41 South - Design and Construction 0 930 12" Force Main 600 600 US 41 South Pump Station 3.17 to Station 3.18 20,000 L.F. of 12" Force Main 931 1201/16" Force Main 1000 1000 Immokalee Road - Quail Creek to CR 951 15,000 L.F. of 12"/16" Force Main TOTAL 6600 6600 Notes: • completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of this Fourth Annual CIE Update & Amendment by the BCC. F� 4 CATEGORY A LANDFILL PROJECTS: COLLIER COMITY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT $(000) Project ------------------------------------- 92-93 ----- 93-94 ----- 94-93 -__-- 95-94 96-97 -_~- ----- Total l000 Naples Landfill Expansion 50O 1200 1000 2700 Land Acquisition, approximately i 300 acres (when completed) 1001 Leachate Treatment Plant 1425 1425 Run-off management and processing 1002 Naples Landfill (COMPLETED)* Cell 16, Phase II a a 1003 Naples Landfill (COMPLETED)* 0 Cell 16, Phase III 1004 Naples Landfill (COMPLETED)e Cells 3 & 4 Closure 1005 Naples Tandfill (COMPLETED)* ►' Cell 6 Closure 1006 Naples Landfill 1223 253 11177 250 12903 Develop 300 acres � 1007 Immokalee 200 , 2180 2380 # 10 acre landfill, New 4 s Cell Construction 1008 Immokalee (COMPLETED)* Closure, Landfill Cell 1 TOTAL 1923 4805 1253 11177 250 19408 Notes2 * Completed is defined as either: (1) in service; (2) under construction; or (3) subject to a binding funded contract for construction at the time of the adoption of this Fourth Annual CIE Update & Amendment by the BCC. 1 1 1 C COSTS i REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year (FY93-97) amounts of restricted. revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY ARTERIAL i COLLECTOR ROADS $109,293,000 LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes $ 7,561,000 Road Impact Fees 34,765,000 MSTD (Livingston Road) 16,000,000 Revenue Bonds (Series FY94) 50,967,000 109,293,000 Balance 0 STATE ROADS NETWORK LESS Commercial Paper Program DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROZECTS WATER i SEWER SYSTEMS LESS System Development,Fees/User Fees SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL LESS Solid Waste User Fees •PARKS i RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees Boating Improvement Funds EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE LESS EMS Impact Fees CIE - 52 11,608,000 11,608,000 Balance 0 Balance 0 15,530,000 15,530,000 Balance 0 19,408,000 19,408,000 Balance 0 22,948,000 17,282,600 850,000 18,132,600 Deficit ( 4,815,400) t00% 02 PAGE 75 1,728,000 1,728,000 Balance 0 S PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION By the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, appropriate land development regulations will be adopted and the following programs will be implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvements Element will be achieved or exceeded. ], Building Permit Review As part of the review of all applications for building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. 2 Development Order Review As part of the review of requests for all development orders having negative impacts on Category A Public Facilities other than building permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities is planned for completion concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development during the next five fiscal years. 3. Impact Fees (' Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1.5. 4. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. 5. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvements Element. 1 R Annual update and Amendment of CA01tal Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an on -going process. Annually beginning in April of each year, the element will be updated and amended in conjunction with the County's Annual Plan Amendment Cycle, budget process, the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections, and the findings of the AUIR. The update and amendment will include: i Amended May 19, 1992 CIE - 54 600K 11 50 PAGE 77 1. Revision of population projections to reflect the most recent/ BEBR projections or as required consistent with CIE Policy \ 1.1.2; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 9. Update of unit costs; 4. Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the service standards. 6. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October lat. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. i 8. Amendment, deletion or addition -of adopted implementing policies as changing conditions dictate. In addition to the annual update, the County will perform an assess- / ment of the status of the Capital Improvement Element in November of (` each year in conjunction with the release of the preliminary BEBR population estimates and projections. This analysis will include an assessment of the status of capital projects funded during the prior fiscal year along with an assessment of existing and projected service levels versus the adopted standards. 7. Concurrency Management System The County shall establish by ordinance and maintain a Concurrency Management System. The system shall consist of the following components: A. Annual monitoring report on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5. of this Element. The report shall summarize the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity will also be done. These forecasts will be based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. This annual report will r Amended May 19, 1992 CIS - 55 toot 058 ma 78 rr r constitute the evidence of the capacity and levels of service of public facilities for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following completion of the annual report. B. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 2 to enforce the requirements of Policy 1.5.1. and 1.5.3. of this Element. . C. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. D. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvements Element: 1. Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for county -wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. 2. Standards for public facilities that serve less than he entire County are applied to development orders on he basis of levels of service within assigned areas. 3. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case -by -case monitoring, for the following reasons: a. annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the county's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. S. 5-year Evaluation The required 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: a. review of annuals reports of the Concurrency Management System; CIE - 56 sou Q:58 PAGE 79 xJ p;y APPENDIX A PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS Fourth Annual Update i Amendment 1992/93 - 1996/97 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Prepared.by Growth Management Department 1992 h�• LIST OF TABLES Pace I. LEVEL OF SERVICE; ANALYSIS OF NEED Arterial and Collector Roads 14 Potable Water System 18 Sewer Treatment Plant : North County 22 Sewer Treatment Plant : South County 23 Solid Waste : Two Year Lined Cell Capacity 26 Solid Waste : Ten Years of Raw Land 27 Emergency Medical Services 31 Isle of Capri Fire District 35 Ochopee Fire District 36 Jail 40 Library Buildings 44 Library Collection 48 Government Buildings 51 Drainage 55 Parks & Recreation 59 II. FACILITY INVENTORY - - Arterial and Collector Roads 15 Potable Water System 20 Sewer Treatment Plant 24 Landfill 29 Emergency Medical Services 32 Fire Station and Apparatus 37 Jail 41 Library Buildings 45 Library Collection 49 Government Buildings 52 Drainage 56 Park & Recreation Facilities 62 III. COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COST Arterial and Collector Roads 16 Potable Water System 20 Sewer Treatment Plant 24 Landfill 29 Emergency Medical Services 33 Fire Station and Apparatus 38 Jail 42 Library Buildings 46 Library Collection 49 Government Buildings 53 Drainage Canal 56 -ii— f toot C�5� rest 83 S T INTRODUCTION I PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY In accordance with Section 7.2 of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24, adopted March 21, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed its Third Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on August 11, 1992. The AUIR, using standards of service levels identified in the other elements of the Growth Management Plan, forecasts the amount of public facilities that will be required in Collier County by 1996/97, including the costs of, and revenues for, the required facilities. In addition to the Public Facilities standards defined in the Plan, this report includes objective, measurable standards for other facilities such as Emergency Medical Services, Fire Stations, Jail, Library Buildings, Library Collection and Government Buildings. The intent of including these additional "Facility" standards in the analysis of need is to update and amend the comprehensive Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Collier County. The AUIR, together with instructions from the Board of County Commissioners, is the foundation for the preparation of Fourth Capital Improvement Element Update and Amendment (1992-1997). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) is updated and amended annually to provide information on: 1. The financially feasible standards of service which are used to calculate the type and amount of public facilities that are required during the next six years; 2. specific capital improvement projects which are necessary to provide the amount of public facilities specified in this report; and 3. The goals, objectives and policies that.ensure the adoption and implementation of public facilities concurrent with development. II. STUDY METHODOLOGY Given the statutory and regulatory requirement that the CIE be based on financially feasible, measurable standards of service levels for a period of at least five years, this report was updated in order to answer two questions: 1. What is the quantity of public facilities that will be required in 1996/977 2. Is it financially feasible to provide the quantity of facilities that will be required in 1996/977 C The answer to each question can be calculated by using objective data and two formulas. CWAC 500K 058 PAGE 84 i' M Question 1. what is the quantity of public facilities that will be / required in 1996/97? Formula 1.1: Demand x Standard - Requirement Where Demand is the estimated 1996/97 population (or other appropriate measure of need), and Standard is the amount of facility or service per unit of demand. Formula 1.2: Requirement - Inventory - Surplus (Deficiency) Where Requirement is the result of Formula 1.1, and Inventory is the quantity of facility available as of September 30, 1992. Ouestion 2. Is it financially feasible to grovide the quantity of facilities that are required in 1996/97? Formula 2.1: Deficiency x Average Cost/Unit - $Deficiency Where Deficiency is the result of Formula 1.2, and Average Cost/Unit is the usual cost of one unit of facility. Formula 2.2: $Deficiency - Revenue - $Surplus/(Deficiency) Where $Deficiency is the result of Formula 2.1, and Revenue is the money available for public facilities. The result of Formula 2.2 is the test of financial feasibility of the standards of service. A surplus of revenue over cost means the standard of service is affordable with money left over (the surplus), therefore, the standard is financially feasible. A deficiency of revenue compared to cost means that there is not enough money to build the facilities, and therefore the standard is not financially feasible. III. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The calculations in this report provide answers to the questions and formulas described above. In order to perform the calculations, six separate areas of data collection and analysis were investigated: a. Types of public facilities, :WAM 500% 058 PA6i 85 Y`{ ( b. Population and other demand factors, C. Standards for levels of service, d. Inventory of existing facilities, e. Average costs of new facilities, and f. Revenue sources. A. Tunes of Facilities Florida Statutes require the CIE to include " .. transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities." This study includes all of these facilities except education and health facilities which are not provided by the County. The regulations also require the CIE to include all the public facilities for which the County is financially responsible. The following types of public facilities are included in this report as a result of this regulation: Jail, Emergency Medical Service, Dependent Fire District Stations and Apparatus, Libraries and other Government Buildings. If a type of public facility is not included in the CIE, the County is still permitted to expend money on such.facilities, but such discretionary expenditures will have to compete with all the ( "mandatory" expenditures that maintain the standards of service levels. For information purposes, Appendix D outlines the 6-year Capital Improvement Plan for the Collier County Public Schools (1992-1997). E. Population and Other Demand Factors The Collier County Growth Planning Department prepared the population and housing data that are the basis for the demand factors contained in this study. The Growth Planning Department started with the high - range forecasts by the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and .Business Research (BEER). High -range data was selected instead of mid -range projections because an analysis by -the Department shows that the County's actual growth rate corresponds to the high -range fore- casts more than to the mid -range. The BEBR data is provided on a County -wide basis as of April 1st in five year increments (i.e., 1992, 1997, 2002 etc.). The County -wide forecasts were extrapolated from April 1st to October 1st in order to coincide with the County's fiscal year. Linear extrapolations were used to estimate the population during intermediate years 1992 through 1997 in order to accommodate the time period of the CIE. The adjusted high -range forecasts were expanded for peak seasonal population for use with public facilities that are sensitive to seasonal population variations. Finally, the adjusted County -wide permanent population total was allocated three ways: Urban vs. Rural; Incorporated vs. 3 - BOOK ��C7 PA6t V V Unincorporated; and among thirteen planning areas. (To date, there is no satisfactory methodology for allocating the peak seasonal population among urban/rural, incorporated/unincorporated or planning areas). Section 5 of Appendix A summarizes the most significant population projections. C. Standards for Levels of Service The standards of service that are used in this study were reviewed by Staff, the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), the Collier County Planning Commission, and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of adoption of the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989. only by formal amendment of the Growth Management Plan can the standard of service and the corresponding level of service be altered, replaced or deleted. In general, the standards which have been adopted were selected from one of the following sources: 1. A standard adopted by Collier County in the existing comprehensive plan, or other official County study or publication (i.e., land development code, ordinance, engineering study, etc.); 2. A standard of a state agency or professional association, if recommended (with or without adjustment} by the appropriate department of Collier County government; 3. A "standard" development from the existing level of service ! or the present ratio of facilities to demand in Collier C County. The standard that is recommended for a public facility appears on the "cover sheet" for the facility, and other standards that can be used as reference points are listed below the recommended standards. All public facilities operated by Collier County are located and counted annually, and the inventories are summarized in the AUIR and Appendix A of the CIE. The inventory of existing facilities is extended through the end of the current fiscal year by adding any facilities that are planned, budgeted, under construction and scheduled for completion by September 30, 1992. Facilities appearing in the CIE that will be completed after September 30, 1992, are considered currently available for concurrency determinations if they will be completed, under construction or under contract prior to September 30, 1994. Facilities appearing in the CIE after October 1, 1994 are not available for concurrency determination until they are completed, under construction, under contract, in the adopted Collier County Budget or, in the case of roads,.in the first three (3) years of either the CIE or FDOT 5-Year Work Program and meet the requirements of CIE Policy 1.5.4.E. 4 lOOK U50 PAQ 87 Average Costs of New Facilities To test the probable financial feasibility of the standards of service, an average cost per new facility is used in Formula 2.1, described above. The average costs are re-evaluated annually by the County department which is responsible for the facility. The results appear in a separate table of "Cost Components and Average Costs" that accompanies the calculation of each public facility's requirements. After standards of service are reviewed by the Planning Commission, and they are adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, the County prepares specific capital improvement projects to meet the standards, and each project includes detailed cost estimates which will replace the average costs used in this report. F. Revenue Sources Most counties have a few revenue sources that are regularly used for capital improvements, and others that are used for operating costs. Chapter 3, Forecasts of Revenues, lists the revenue sources that Collier County can rely upon to pay for public facility capital improvements. Each revenue source is listed and an estimate of receipts is forecast for the period 1992/93 - 1996/97. IV. FORMAT OF THE REPORT This document represents an important phase, in the annual re-evaluation of the Capital Improvement Element of Collier County's Growth Management Plan. The report contains this, year's analysis of public facilities that are provided by the County, including: C' o Recommendations for standards of service; o Forecasts of population and other indicators of demand for service; o Calculations of -present and future requirements for additional facilities; o summaries of inventories of existing public facilities; o Identification of surpluses and deficiencies of existing facilities compared to present and future requirements; o Calculation of the costs of eliminating deficiencies; o Forecasts of revenue to pay for the facilities; and o Determination of the financial feasibility of the recommended standards of service. The report is primarily statistical in nature because of the use of objective, quantifiable standards of service that indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. The following narrative describes the format of the report. S 600K Q50 PAGE 88 This report is presented in four parts: A. Introduction; B. Calculation of Public Facility Requirements; C. Forecasts of Revenue; and D. Analysis of the Financial Feasibility of the Recommendations. A. introduction This introduction presents the purpose, methodology, and data collection and analyses that produced the study. Following this description of the format of the report, the introduction will conclude with a list of State regulatory requirements that are fulfilled by this report. B. Calculation of Public facility Requirements The calculation of requirements in Chapter 2 uses a standardized four- part format for each type of public facility: (1) population and standards, (2) calculations, (3) inventory, and (4) cost components and average costs. ,1. Population and standards The population and standards page begins with the "title" which identifies the name of the type of public facility that is analyzed. The "population to be served" identifies the "service recipient," the "service area," and the "service period." Usually all residents of the County receive the service in all areas of the county, but some facilities are provided to only part of the population and part of the geographical area of the county (i.e., utilities and fire stations). The service period indicates whether service is targeted for the permanent population, the peak seasonal population, or a weighted average of the two (a months permanent, 4 months peak). Population figures used in this report have been updated to reflect the most recent forecast from the University of Florida's BEBR. The recommended standard of service for the facility is a numerical amount of service capacity per person (or other unit of demand, like a utility account). The standard indicates how much service each person is likely to use, and it is the "standard" in Formula 1.1, described above. The source of each standard is also listed. Immediately following the recommended standard is a list of standards from other sources that can be used for reference purposes. 2. Level of service standards xxxxxxxxx The second section of analysis provides calculations according to type of recipient and/or time period. The data at the bottom of the page is presented in seven columns, as follows: - 6 - t00% Q58 PAGE 89 C q. (1) (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) (7) AMOUNT REQUIRED AMOUNT SURPLUS OR VALUE TIME POP- AT PLANNED AMOUNT DEFICIENCY OR COST PERIOD ULATION STANDARD IN CIP AVAILABLE AMOUNT $X.XXX/UNIT Column 1 is used to create a separate line of data and calculations for three time periods: 1. from now through the end of fiscal year (9/30/92); 2. the five fiscal years from October 1992 through September 1997; and 3. the second five year time frame from October 1997 through September 2002. These three time periods distinguish between the needs of current residents and those for future growth. Under Column 1, the first line of data is for current residents as of the end of fiscal year 1991-92. This line establishes whether or not there is a deficiency of existing service compared to the recommended standard. The second line of data shows the additional facility requirements for growth that will occur during the next five years (October 1992 - September 1997). The total of the two groups (current residents + growth) is displayed on the C next line of data. The fourth line of data shows the additional facility requirements for growth that will occur during the second five year period (October 1997 - September 2002). The total for all three groups is displayed on the last line. Column 2 shows the number of people or other demand factor (i.e., utility customer accounts). This number is the "demand" in Formula 1.1, described above. The population or other demand factor will be allocated between present population and new growth, as described above. Column 3 shows the quantity of the facility that is needed to provide the standard of service to the populations. This "requirement" is calculated by using Formula 1.1: multiply the demand (i.e., population) times the standard (i.e., service units per capita). The standard that appears in the heading for Column 3 is the "standard of service" that was recommended on the population and standards page. Column 4 displays the next fiscal year inventory anticipated to be added during 1992-93. Column S lists the amount of the public facility that is available for C the present population (i.e., current facilities plus any planned for completion by 9/30/92, or contracted for completion before 9/30197). 7 SOCK 058 PAGE 90 s% This inventory of facilities is always attributed to the existing population, and is never shown on any data line for future growth. The data in Column 4 is the "inventory" in Formula 1.2, described above, and a full summary of the inventory is presented on the page following the calculations. column 6 shows the surplus or deficiency of current facilities (Column 5) compared to required facilities (Column 3). The amount in Column 6 is the "surplus/(deficiency)" calculated using Formula 1.2, and any deficiency is also the "deficiency" in Formula 2.1, described above. If the requirement for a facility is less than its inventory, the County has more than enough facilities to meet the standard, and the extra facilities are counted as "surplus." If the requirement is greater than the inventory, the shortage is listed in parentheses ( ) as a "(deficiency)." The surplus/deficiency for 9/30192 is combined with the deficiency for 10/92 - 9/97 in order to arrive at the total surplus or deficiency as of September 30, 1997. In other words, a surplus of existing facilities will reduce or offset the deficiency caused by growth and any deficiency of existing facilities will be added to the deficiency caused by growth. Column 7 shows the cost to eliminate each deficiency (or the value of surplus public facilities). The average cost of -one unit of facility (i.e., mile, gallon, ton, etc.) is listed in the Column heading, and is itemized on the Cost Component and Average Cost page. The cost is the "Average Cost/Unit" in Formula 2.1, described above. The estimated cost of eliminating the deficiency is determined by Formula 2.1. multiply the deficiency times the average cost/unit. Any cost surplus/deficiency for 9/30/92 is combined with the deficiency for 10/92 - 9/97 in the same manner as Column 6. The difference is that Column 6 shows the quantity of the facilities, and Column 7 shows the dollar cost. J. Inventory The third section of the requirements analysis presents a summary of the inventory of existing public facilities. The "title" names the type of facility, and the "subtitle" indicates the unit of measurement (i.e., miles, gallons, tons, etc.) that is used to report the inventory. The data is presented in six columns, as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) (3) (6) IN,PLACE i USABLE ADD IN ADD IN AREA NAME i NO. 9130/91 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL Column 1 lists the planning area or other service area names. Column 2 lists the planning area number. ~t, toot l;4L)U 91 I Column 3 counts the number of facilities that were in place and either in use or usable "as is" as of September 30, 1991. Column 4 counts the additional facilities that are included in the current fiscal year budget (1991-92) and which will be completed by September 30, 1992. Where appropriate, facilities that are contracted for completion after October 1, 1991, but before September 30, 1997, are also included. These facilities are counted "in inventory" because their costs are already financed from approved funding mechanisms, therefore such facilities will not constitute any additional "cost" as shown on the calculations page. Column s counts the additional facilities that will be included in the 1992-93 budget and will be completed by September 30, 1993. Coll— 6 is the total usable facilities, the sum of Columns 3 through 5. The usable facilities in Column 6 appear in the calculations of facility requirements as the inventory of facilities that are presently available to meet the requirements of the standard of service (see Column 5 on the level of service page). 4. Cost Components and Average Costs The final section of the analysis of each public facility is an itemized list of cost components and average costs. This page details the component parts of a "prototype" or•"averacje"'facility, and estimates the cost of each component. The data is presented in four C columns, as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) # COST COST PER COST/FACILITY COST COMPONENT COMPONENTS COMPONENT (2) x (3) Column i lists each component of the facility (i.e., land, construction, equipment, etc.). C.. Column 2 lists the number of components in the "average" facility (i.e., the number of acres of land at a water treatment plant). Column 3 gives the unit cost for components (i.e., the average cost of one acre of land). Column 4 is used to display the results of calculations (i.e., the result of multiplying "X" acres of land by "$Y" per acre). At the bottom of Column 4 the total cost of the prototype facility is converted to a cost per unit. For example, the cost of a 4 million gallon per day (MGD) water treatment plan is divided by 4 MGD in order to estimate the cost per MGD. The cost per unit is the figure that is used in the calculations of facility requirements to estimate the cost of eliminating any deficiency of public facilities compared to the requirement (see heading of Column 7, level of service page). - 9 - im 058 PAGE 92 <rv; C. Revenue Forecasts i ., The forecasts of revenue in Chapter 3 present the sources of revenue that Collier County will use, including alternatives, to finance its public facility capital improvements. Each source of revenue is described, and the basis for each forecast is given. D. Financial Feasibility AnaivsAA The analysis of the financial feasibility of the recommendations appears in Chapter 4 as a comparison of the costs of required facilities (presented in Chapter 2), to the available revenue (fore- cast in Chapter 3). The calculation is performedusing Formula 2.2, described above.' If the revenue is greater than the cost, the recommended standards of service are financially feasible. If the cost exceeds the revenue, the standards of service are not financially feasible. In the event that a standard of service is not financially feasible, there are four options available to the county: 1. Reduce the standard of service, which will reduce the cost; 2. Increase revenues to pay for the proposed standard of service (higher rates for existing revenues, and/or new sources of revenue); 3. Reduce the average cost (and possibly the quality) of the public facility, thus reducing the total cost; or 4. Any combinations of options 1 - 3. V. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE REGULATIONS As part of the research conducted for this report, data was collected and analyses were performed that are required by Chapter 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code as part of the preparation of the CIE. This report contains summaries of data and analyses required by the following sections of Section 9J-5.016, F.A.C.: Section (1) (c) requires an inventory of revenue sources and funding mechanisms available for capital improvements: See Chapter 3, Revenue Forecasts. Section (2) (b) requires an analysis of the general fiscal Implications of existing deficiencies and future needs for each type of public facility: See the net value of surplus assets and net cost of required facilities for present populations,•five years of growth and total population in Column 7, "Value or (Cost)," of the table of calculations for each type of public facility. - 10 - eoo� 458 r�cc 93 C Section (2) (c) requires estimates of the costs of needed capital improvements and an explanation of the basis of the cost estimates: See the Cost Component and Average Costs table for each public facility. Parts of Section (3) require various objectives and policies dealing with adopted level of service standards: See the specific standards of service on each population and standards page and in the table of calculations for each public facility. Parts of Section (3) also require various objectives and policies dealing with the financial feasibility of the CIE, and the ability to make facilities available concurrent with development: See Chapter 4, Financial Feasibility Analysis. y2. CONCLUSION The Collier County Hoard of Commissioners formally adopted the original CIE of the Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989. Chapter 163 Florida Statutes, requires that the CIE be updated annually. Rule 9J-5 of the Florida AdministratlYe Code requires that the CIE cover a period of at least five fiscal years. As a result, this Fourth CIE Update and Amendment, covers the 1992/93 - 1996/97 period. M*= lOOK 05 pmc 94 0 COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents other: 2. Service Area: _ County -wide _ other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population - 227,000 _ Peak Period Population - 310,312 X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak - 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: County arterial and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated " " below on the basis of peak hour, peak season traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roadways: C.Road Airport Road From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 Pine Ridge Road Airport Road to I-75 Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season shall be maintained.on all other County arterial and collector roads, however, any section of road may operate at Level of Service "E" for a period not to exceed two fiscal years following the determination of Level of Service "E" in order to provide the County with time to restore Level of Service "D" by making appropriate improvements. Rule of Thumb: Mileage equivalent of LOS - 0.00424 lane miles per capita (1) Source of Standard: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Other Standards for Reference Standard 0.0045 lane miles/ Source Current Level of Collier County Service capita (1) LOS C Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) - 12 - 1-0 OK 058 PAGE 95 Other Standards for Reference (continued) LOS D Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance (3) LOS C Rural Florida DOT Transportation Plan (4) LOS D Urban Expressways 80% or more @ LOS Non -expressways 70% or more @ LOS LOS D Seminole County (5) LOS C off-season Lee County CIP (6) LOS D season (1) 676 lane miles/148,722 weighted average population 0 9/30/87 (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan, p.29. Arterial LOS benchmark for land use point rating system (3) Ordinance 85-55, as amended by Ordinance 90-14, Collier County (4) Florida DOT: Appendix A. Florida Transportation Plan, 1986, pp. 57-58, 60-61, 74 (5) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 (6) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.9, based on local data - 13 - OOOx 058 PArr 96 C ARTERIAL AM COLLECTOR ROADS LEVEL OF SERVICE STAIDARD: O.DOAN LAME MILES/CA►ITA• POPULATION LAW MILES LAME MILES LAME MILES AVAILABLE SURKUS/ (t1E/IClE11CT) VALUE OR COST) AT (Sm.170 FISCAL CO -VIDE REO)IRED PLANNED YEAR WEIGHTED AVG. 0.00424 IN CI► _ _ ............... ..... ....................... 90-91 ..__.........751.2 772.2 ......................... i 77,1n 23.2 7954 21.._...21. 0 t5.$) 17,937,570 (L.697,935) 91-92 92-93 188.897 201,876 800.9 856.0 12.4 DOES (48.2) (41.170.994) (61.500,2L0) 93-94 .214.8SS 911.0 31.2 10.2 MO 849.2 (72.0) (116.5) (99,767,OS6) 94-95 95-% 227.334 2L1,O" 9".0 1.022.0 12.0 861.2 (160.8) (137.350.536) 08L,159.05Z) %-97 25L,L93 1.079.1 2.3 $63.3 363.5 (215.6) (272.6) (232,8L6, 97-98 98-99 267.940 281,386 1136.1 1:193.1 863.5 (329.6) (281.53L.s32) (330.222.122) 99-Do 29L,833 1.250.1 363.5 863.5 M6.0 tu6.9) (381,728,573) 00-01 01-02 309.051 324,042 1.310.4 1.373.9 363.5 t5:0.1) (L35.968,368) LAW Nim LANE MILES PLANNED LAW MILES AVAILABLE SIOKUS/ (DEFICIENCY) VALUE W (COST) AT a o POPULATIONAVAILABLEO)IREO 170... sm.ea TIME PERl00 (WEIGHTED AVG.) O.0O424 IN CIP ......... ... X 1 .............. ............... .............................. ............... ��. ~ PRESENT t0 188,897 800.9 23.2 793.: (5.3) •4.697.933 CJi + 9/30/92 1 5 YEAR GIOY(M 65.596 273.2 68.1 68.1 (210.1) TO/1/92-+1R0/97 5-TEAM SUBTOTAL 254,493 1.079.1 91.3 363.5 (2=5.6) (1E4,:59.032) co 1011/92-9130197 20 5-TR OWN 69,549 294.3 0.0 0.3 ;294.3) 10/1/97-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 324,042 1.373.9 l "A 363.5 (510.4) (435.968.368) 10/1/92-9/30/02 1 MOTE: ............... This is a reference standard only and Is not appllcaole to the isswrce of develepeent orders. i.e., it Is not the adopted level of Serrice Standard. a n C F i SUMMARY OF ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD INVENTORY (Lane Hiles) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) PLAN AREA NAME i NO. USABLE Q ADD BY 9130L91 9/30192 ADD BY U30/93 USABLE TOTAL North Naples 1 82.6 11.2 12.4 106.2 Central Naples 2 74.8 6.4 81.2 .Golden Gate 3 81.2 81.2 East Naples 4 32.4 3.6 36.0 South Naples 5 19.8 19.8 Marco 6 55.8 55.8 Royal Faka-Palm 7 64.8 64.8 Creek Rural Estates a 31.4 31.4 Urban Estates 9 99.2 , _ 99.2 Corkscrew 10 138.6 138.6 Immokalee. li 29.4 2.0 31.4 Big Cypress 12 62.2 62.2 Countywide Total 772.2 23.2 12.4 807.0 • Includes County arterials and collectors, excludes State and Federal roads. \, 15 r- W Q58 PArf JO ti � � s COUNTY ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROAD COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS pry.... (1) (2) A. Design & Permitting $ 75,000 B. Right -of -Way 170,000 C. Construction (1) 497,000 D. Other (2) 112,170 AVERAGE COST PER LANE MILE $ 854,170 * Cost represents average cost for urban and rural sections. (1) Includes culverts and bridges - also applies.to both arterial and collector costs. (2) Includes lighting, sidewalks, bikepaths, mitigation, administrative costs and construction engineering/inspection. BOOK 058 PAGE 99 s.. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM SERVICE AREA * POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: _ All County Residents _X Other: Water Customers 2. Service Area: County -wide _ X Other: Water System 3. Service Period: _ Permanent Population - X Peak Period Population • 106,456** _ Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak STANDARD OF SERVICE: 135 gal/day/capita plus 21% for non-residential Source of Standard: Utilities Division, based on Water Master Plan (1) and on historical ratios of residential and non-residential water consumption Other Standards for Reference r ,Standard 100 gdpc*** Source Lee County CIP - (2) 125 gdpc 6 County region (S.W. Florida) (3) 100 gdpc Seminole County (4) Fire Flow**** Seminole County (4) 144 gdpc Florida Governor's Office (5) 125 gdpc Sipe and Starnes (5) * Includes wells, storage tanks, treatment plants, and aquifer storage and recovery ** Peak seasonal population based on U of F upper range projections Includes County Water/Sewer District and proposed expansions Excludes Marco Water/Sewer District and Goodland Water District *** gdpc - gallons per day per capita **** Fire Flow - 500 gpm residential & 1250 gpm commercial, institutional or industrial (1) Phase I Water Master Plan for Western Collier County, October 1985, p.41 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.2O0, (based on local engineering standard) (3) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Commission, "Economic Views," v.10, n.2, February, 1986 (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 (5) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs: 1990 and 2000 Chapter 3 - 17 - sm 058 ?Art 100 POTABLE PATER SIS. • LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDAROt 13SAM/WITA PLUS 212 11ON-RESIDENTIAL FISCAL COUNTY a No REQUIRED No NW SURFUS/ PLAMNED AVAILABLE CDEFI IC ENCT) VALUE Ot (COST) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000245 IN CI► ............... %2.497•&;A ........................................................................... 90-91 73,300 18.0 .............. 4.3 16.3 (1.7) (t,245 9") 91-92 73.755 19.3 13.2 29.3 10.2 25.A7i,9B9 92-93 BA,211 20.6 (2.5) 27.0 6.4 6.5 IS.9BA.934 16,234.699 93.94 89,6" 94-95 95,121 22.0 23.3 1.5 28.5 4.0 32.5 9.2 22.978.343 95-96 100.577 24.6 0 32.5 7.9 19.731.403 96-97 106.456 26.1 0 32.5 6.4 15.96t.934 97-90 112.336 27.5 0 32.5 5.0 12.40.230 90-99 118.213 99-00 124,095 29.0 30.A 0 32.5 0 32.5 3.5 2.1 8.741.761 5245.057 00-01 129,974 31.3 0 32.5 0.7 1:743.352 01-02 136.528 33.4 0 32.3 (0.9) (2.247.ul) a+ POPULATION NCO No NGO SURPLUS/ VALUE A o x COUaTT tEQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (OEf1ciERCt) (COST) AT s2.497.6(6 TINE mica SERVICE AREA ' 245ICAPITA IN CI• .............. ............................................ .............. .............. PRESENT TO 78.755 19.3 13.2 29.3 10.2 25.47S.909 C ►' 9RRE0E92 e to 5 TEAR GRWN 27.701 ( 6.E 3.0 3.o 10/l/92-9/30/97 Q S-TEAR SUBTOTAL 106.456 26.1 16.2 32.5 6.4 15,9BA.93t, F.i 1011/92-9130/91 2NO S-TR cmffN 30.072 7.3 0.0 0.0 10/1197-9/30/02 10 TEAR TOTAL 136,S2$ 33.4 3.0 32.3 (0.9) (2.247.881) 10/l/92-9/30/02 . 'DEFINITION re�tmait plant capacity plus milable thirty(30) day potable water storm plus awifer , storm and recovery systass. A temporary permit roe obtained from the Florida Deportment of Emira" at toyulation to increase the water plant treatment capacity by 4ta9 for a period of two (2) years. Thee, in FM-93. a loss of oveilable Nimes appears due to the expiration of too tomporary permit. FURTHER NOTES REGARDING WATER TREATMENT PLANT REQUIREMENTS / Standards of Service - 135 gdpc + 21% for non-residential, which totals 163.485 gdpc. The standard is multiplied times 1.5 to incorporate peak design factor of 50%: 163.485 x 1.5 - 245 gdpc. Existing "deficiency" is met by private utilities which may be phased out by future County capacity increases. Utility planning requires the development of larger scale facilities in order to provide for needs beyond 1996. I - 19 - 600K 102 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM FACILITY INVENTORY (Millions of Gallons per day) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE @ ADD BY ADD BY USABLE MEA NAME h NO. 9/30/91 9/30/92 2130/93 TOTAL Water Service Area 16.3 MGD 13.2 MGD (2.5) MGD 27.0 MGD WATER TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) (3) COST COMPONENT COST COST PER COMPONENTS COMPONENT 10 A. MGD Treatment Plant Treatment Plant 12 (MGD) B. Design (% of Plant) 14,760,000 C. Land (acre) 20 (5) TOTAL COST (6) MGD IN PLANT (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD (5) / (6) 15 A. MGD Wellfield Equipment (Well) 15 B. Design (4 of Wall) 4,460,985 C. Land (acre) 0.215 (5) TOTAL COST (6) MGD IN WELLFIELD (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD (5) / (6) 10 A. MGD Storage Tank Structure (Tank) 1 B. Design (% of Tank) 6,340,000 C. Land (acre) 5 (5) TOTAL COST (6) MGD IN STORAGE TANK (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD (5) / (6) TOTAL FACILITY COST PER MGD Treatment Plant Well Storage Tank Cost per MGD -20- BOOK 058 PAGE 103 17% 17,000 17% 36,000 5.8% 22,326 (4) COST/FACILITY 121 X l31 $ 14,760,000 2,509,000 340.000 17,609,000 1,467,000 4,460,985 758,367 5,227,092 15 348,473 6,340,000 370,101 111.630 6,821,731 10 682,173 1,467,000 348,473 682,173 2,497,646 1 i SEWER SERVICE AREA TREATMENT PLANTS POPULATION TO BE SERVED A8 OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: All County Residents X Other: Sewer Customers 2. Service Area: — County -wide X Other: Sewer System 3. Service Period: Permanent Pop. - X Peak Period Pop. - North 54,045 South 91,960 weighted Average of Permanent and Peak STANDARD OF SERVICE: 100 gal/day/capita plus 214 for non-residential Source of Standard: Utilities Division, based on Sewer Master Plan (1) and on historical ratios of residential and non-residential water consumption Other Standards for Reference Standard Source .100 gdpc** Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) C 80 gdpc Lee County CIP (3) 34 gdpc Union County (lowest in Florida) (4) 510 gdpc Nassau County (highest in Florida) (4) 122.5 gdpc Governor's Office: State average (4) 100 gdpc 6 County region (S.W. Florida) (5) 300 gdpc Seminole County (6) * Includes effluent disposal facilities and collection systems AA gdpc - gallons per day per capita (1) South County Sewer Master Plan, May, 1986, p.VIII-6 (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan, p.215. Reference to benchmark used in "201" plan (3) Lee County, CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.208 (based on local engineering standard). (4) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Needs: 1990 and 2000. Chapter 4, (based on 85% of"Florida average water consumption of 144 gdpc) (5) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic Views," v.10, n.2, February, 1986 (6) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 21 600K 058 PA6i 104 v M CA SLYER TREATMENT KANIs NORTR COUNTY UM OF SERVICE STAMM2 100/i IWtTA PLUS 21.1% NOR -RESIDENTIAL PLAN= No AVAILABLE /) CKF Itt ENC7No VALUE at (COST) AT L YEAR COUNTY SERVICE AREA REOUIRW 0.000121 IN CI► ............... S2,840,143 ....................... 90-91 ...Z ...........`................. 5 ............... 2.0 • 0 .S 4.5 .............0 (0.3) .043) 91-92 92-93 39.962 42.731 4.3 5.2 3.0 •` 7.5 2.3 6,532.329 93-94 45.521 5.5 0 0 7.5 7.5 2.0 1.7 5,680,Z56 4,828.243 94-95 95-% 48,290 51,060 5.3 6.2 0 7.S 1.3 3,692.186 %-97 54.045 6.5 0 7.3 1.0 0.6 2,340.143 1.704.086 97-96 98-99 57,029 60,014 6.9 7.3 0 0 7.5 7.3 0.2 568.029 99-00 62,9" 7.6 0 0 7.S 7.S (0.1) (0.S) (264,014) 11,420,072) 00-01 01-02 6S.984 69,311 3.0 8.4 0 7.5 (0.9) t2:556.129) POPULATION CDURTY ROD No REOUIRED PLAN O MD AVAILABLE SURPLUS/ tKFiC1ENCY) VALUE 01 (COST) AT TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA ............................................. 121/GPITA IN CIP ........................... .................. S2,K0.143 1 PRESENT TO 39,982 4.8 0.0 4.3 tO.3) (852.04-3) N N 9/30/92 S YEAR GR.OWTN 14,063 1.7 3.0 3.0 1011/92-9/30/97 S-YEAR SUBTOTAL S4.045 6.S 3.0 7.3 1.0 2,840.143 10/1/92-9/30/9? 2N0 S-YR GROWN 15.266 1.9 0.0 0.0 10/1/97'-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 69.311 _ 8.4 tt �7.0 7.3 (0.9) (2,556.129) 10/1/92-9/30/02 • CIE Project No. 901 - 2.0 MM ExPrrian +• CIE Project No. 917 - 3.0 NO EaPention 1 1 P O a 1 W N ap u � 1 . SEWER TREATMENT PLANT: SUM COUNTY -LEVEL OF SERVICE STAMDARDT 100/M/WITA PLUS 211 BUM -RESIDENTIAL FISCAL COATT� REWIRED ►LA M AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY)/ VALUE OR (COST) AT YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 1M CIP S2.840.143 ............................................................ 90-91 63.318 ............... 7.7 4.7 • 9.0 0 8.0 .............. 0.3 (0.2) BS2.Ot3 (su.029) 91-92 92-93 68,031 72.7" 8.2 8.3 0 9.0 t0.8) (25T2,11A) 93-94 77.456 9.4 8.0 " 16.0 6.6 6.1 18,Tu,9u 17.324.872 96-95 9S-9e 82.169 36.881 9.9 10.5 0 0 16.0 16.0 s.s u.620.787 13,916,701 96-97 97.98 91.960 97.039 11.1 11.7 0 0 16.0 16.0 6.9 6.3 10.212,615 "-99 102.118 12.6 0 16.0 3.6 3.0 1aJ2t,SIS 99-00 00-01 107.197 112.27S 13.0 13.6 0 0 16.0 16.0 2.6 ,520,A29 6,816,343 01-02 117.937 16.3 0 16.0 1.7 4,828.20 POPULATION COUNTY Nln REQUIRED No PLAN" NCD AVAILABLE SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) VALUE OR CCOST) AT TINE ►ERICD SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA IN CIP S2.80, 163 PRESENT TO 63.031 8.2 0.0 8.0 (0.2) (us.029) 9/30/92 S YEAR OROITM 23.929 2.9 8.0 8.0 10/1/92-9/30/97 S-TEAR SUBTOTAL 91.960 11.1 &.0 16.0 6.9 13,916.701 10/l/92-9/30/97 200 S-YR CROI(TN 2S,977 3.2 0.0 0.0 10/l/97.9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 117.937 14.3 ; 8.0 16.0 1.7 4.823.243 10/l/92-9/30/92 • CIE Project no. 904 - 4,7 NW Plant Canatruct)an •• CIE Project No. 916 - 8.0 NO Expwwlon w 1 F 0 CSUMMARY OF SEWER TREATMENT PLANT INVENTORY , (Millions of Gallons per day) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) USABLE 0 ADD BY ADD BY USABLE AREA NAME i NO. 9/30/91 9/30/92 9/30/93 _TOTAL North 4.5 0 3.0 7.5 South 8.0 0 8.0 16.0 SEWER TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (1) (2) (3) (4) COST COMPONENT it COST COMPONENT COST PER COMPONENT COST/FACILITY (2) x (3) 10.5 A. MGD Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (MGD) 8.0 $1,336,000 $ 10,688,000 B. Design (t of Plant). 10,688,000 17% 1,816,960 C. Land (acre) 60 12,799 767.940 (5) TOTAL COST -- 13,272,900 (6) MGD IN TREATMENT PLANT S (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD 1,659,112 11 (5) / (6) MGD System Effluent Disposal A.- Percolation Pond Land 2 294,667 589,334 (MGD) B. Effluent Distribution 6.6 757,.576 5,000,000 (MGD) C: Design (% of above) 5,000,000 17% 850,000 (5) TOTAL COST 6,439,334 (6) MGD SYSTEM EFFLUENT - DISPOSAL (7) AVERAGE COST PER MGD - (5) / (6) TOTAL FACILITY COST PER MGD Treatment Plant 1,659,112 - Effluent Disposal 1.181.031 Total Cost per MGD 2,840,143 1; - 24 - Flo M LANDFILL POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997t 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: __L County -wide Other: 3. Service Period: _, Permanent Population W 227,000 Peak Period Population - 310,312 X weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 4r55 1.39 tons of solid waste/capita/year, and 2 years capacity of lined cells, and 10 years capacity of raw land Source of Standard: Mid -range of 5 year forecast by Solid Waste Department CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee Other Standards for Reference jitand a rd Source 1. 30 tons/capita/year Current Level of County Service (1) 1. 14 tons/capita/year Lee County CIP (2) 1.095 tons/capita/year 6 County region (S.W. Florida) (3) 1. 00 tons/capita/year Seminole County (4) (1) 297,104 tons/year/177,171 weighted average pop. @ 09/30/91 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.220, (based on 1986 service level) (3) S.W. Florida Regional Planning Council, "Economic views," v.10, n.2, February, 1986 (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 y S' ry 25 BOOK 058 PAGE 108 r • j a Yf x .l{^ii} .y V .. SOLID PISTE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1.39 TONS/CAPITA TWO YEARS LIMES CELL CAPACITY (Naples and lamoRales) :r. FISCAL POPULATION CO -WIDE BEGINNING CAPACITY CAPACITY REQUIRED 2ND YEAR CAPACITY CAPACITY PLANNED SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) VALUE/ COST AT CAPACITY ACTUALLY USED ACTUAL LOS YEAR UEIGRTED AVG. AVAILABLE 79 IN tip 2ND YEAR LOSS $9.42 ID ED �«- ... € ............... 90-91 ........."'--' ............... 177,171 1.907.673 --....1 ...... 2" 268 .•--REQUIRED ......... ....--........................ 253.656 0 ............... 1,407,750 t3, 26t,001 ............... 243.230 1.4 91-92 188.597 1,661,405 262,567 270,4K 1.IU.213 2,310,608 21.765,924 •... 224,433 1.2 92-93 201,876 2,581,052 250,608 289:026 0 2,011,415 18,947 558 0.0 93-94 214,855 2,300,444 298,649 307,608 200.000 1,8%,187 17,1143,246 0.0 9<-95 Z27,834 2.201,795 316.689 326,190 0 1.558.916 14,684.990 0.0 95.96 241.046 1.us, 106 335,054 345,106 0 1,Z04,947 11,350,598 0.0 96-97 254,493 1,550,052 353,74S 364,358 0 831.949 7.&U.962 0.0 a 97.98 267,940 1.196,307 372.437 383,610 1.089.000 1.529.261 14,405,635 0.0 98.99 281,386 1.912.870 391.127 402,860 0 1,118,88E 10,539,883 0.0 99.00 294.833 1,521,744 409,818 422,112 0 689,813 6,496,643 0.0 00-01 309,051 1.111.926 429,581 K2,468 0 239,877 2,259,638 0.0 9 01/02 324,042 652.345 450,415 463.931 0 (242.004) (2,185,481) 0.0 f POPULATION BEGINNING CAPACITY 2NO YEAR CAPACITY SURPLUS/ VALUE/ - CO -VIDE CAPACITY REQUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED (DEFICIENCY) COST AT TIME PERIOD VEIGNTED AVG. AVAILABLE 1.5500 REQUIRED ►M Gip 20 YEAR LOSS $11.00/TOM o 0 1 ............." ............... .............. -------------- ............... ............... ............... N � PRESENT TO 9/30/92 188,897 1.661,40S 262,567 270,444 1,182.213 2.310,608 21,765.924 • � 1 5 YEAR GROWTH 65,596 (111,353) 91,179 93.914 200.000 10/1/92.9/30/47 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 254,493 1,550,052 353,745 364.358 1.382.213 2,214,162 20,857,4C8 F-+ 10/l/92-9/30/97 2N0 5-YR GROWTH 69,549 (867,707) 96,673 99,573 1,089,000 , 10/1/97-9/30/0Z 10 YEAR TOTAL 324,042 682,345 450.418 463,931 1,289.000 1.056,996 9,956,899 10/1/92-9/30/02 , NOTES: ATrty (40X) percent reducttan due to materials processing. 1 SOLD PASTE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1.39 TOMS/CAPITA ' TER TEARS OF RAY LAND: ACRES (Nap(aa ad laaokata ) POPULATION POPULATION ACRES RAY LAND RAY LAND ACRES SURPLUS/ VALUE/ FISCAL CO -WIDE TEN TEAR REQUIRED ACRES ACRES ►TANNED (DEFICIENCY) AVERAGE COST AT YEAR ""'---------- WEIGHTED AVG. "'---"'------ --------------- TOTAL ANNUALLY AVAILABLE REQUIRED IN CIP (10-TEARS LAND) 510,000 90-91 177,171 2,350.331 --------------- 23.2 --"----------- --------------- 327.1 --------------- 307.4 --------------- 50 69.7 --------------- 697.U2 91-92 188.897 2,482,211 ' 24.7 353.9 324.6 100 129.3 1,292,885 92-93 201,876 2,617,356 26.4 429.2 342.3 50 136.9 1.369,081 93-94 214.855 2,754.515 28.1 452.8 360.3 120 212.6 2,125,669 94-95 227,834 2.693,691 29.3 5".7 378.5 100 266.3 2.662,641 95-96 241,046 3.034.874 31.5 614.9 396.9 0 213.0 2.180.019 96-97 254,493 3.173.564 33.3 583.4 415.7 0 167.7 1,676,836 97-98 267,940 3,325,269 35.0 550.1 434.9 0 115.2 1,152,123 98-99 281,386 3,474.993 36.3 515.1 454.5 0 60.5 605.374 99-00 294,933 3,627 739 38.6 478.3 474.5 0 3.3 33.087 00-01 309,051 3,783,508 40.4 439.7 494.8 0 (55.1) (551,240) 01-02 324.042 3,925.059 42.4 399.3 513.3 0 02-03 339,035 03-04 354,031 04-05 369.017 05-06 384.736 06-07 401.198 0 0 07-08 417.664 1 08-09 434.132 09-10 450.602 v 09-10 450,602 ( POPULATION POPULATION ACRES RAY LAND RAW LAND ACRES SURPLUS VALUE/ r CO -WIDE TEN YEAR REQUIRED ACRES ACRES PLANNED (DEFICIENCY) AVERAGE COST AT TIME PERIOD VEIGNTED AVG. TOTAL ANNUALLY AVAILABLE REQUIRED IN CI► (10 YEARS LAND) 510,000 ............... ............." "'............ ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... 0' PRESENT TO 188,897 2.482.211 24.7 353.9 324.5 100 129.3 1,292.MS 9/30/92 5 YEAR GROWTH 65,596 696.353 8.6 229; 5 91.1 270 10/1/92-9/30/97 5-TEAR SUBTOTAL 254.493 3.178,564 33.3 583.4 415.7 370 537.7 5,376,336 10/l/92-9/30/97 20 5-YR GROWTH 69,549 746.495 9.1 (184.1) 97.6 0 10/l/97-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 324.042 3,925,059 42.4 399.3 513.3 270 155.9 1.559.433 10/l/92-9/30/02 / ` 1 1 IL I L IS 1'ye: a-� LANDFILL NOTES 1. Total acreage of the Naples and Immokalee Landfills was 400 acres as of 9-30-89. An additional 300 acres of land adjacent to the Naples Landfill is scheduled to be acquired during FY92 for future expansion but may take longer to complete. 2. For inventory and surplus/deficiency calculations, the combined capacity of the Naples and Immokalee landfills is considered available to serve the county -wide population. 3. The remaining capacity of Cell 6 is projected to be 2,458,646 tons by the end of FY91. A recycling rate of 30% and diversion of all biomass, inerts and construction/demolition materials will allow the Naples Cell 6 to last until 1998 at our present growth rate of 6%. However, mining is not yet a certainty. 4. Projection which indicated true present capacity: Gross tons per acre is based on a design of 90, cell height using one square foot of lined area to contain one ton of waste; Cells constructed with 3:1 side slopes. 5. Cell 6 - Naples Phase I Naples Phase II Naples Phase III Cell 2 - Immokalee Phase I Immokalee Phase II - 28 - 600K 058 PAGE 111 1,182,213 Tons Capacity 1,036,551 Tons Capacity 1,182,213 Tons Capacity 200,000 Tons Capacity 200,000 Tons Capacity E I l EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents _ other: 2. Service Area: X County -wide _ Other: 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population = 227,000 _ Peak Period Population = 310,312 _ Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 6 minute or less mean average response time between call for service and arrival at scene for emergency responses to or in major population centers of Collier County Rule of Thumb: 0.00006 EMS units/capita (1) Source of Standard: Director of Emergency Medical Services Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.00005 EMS stations/ Current Collier County Service (2) capita Average 0.00003 EMS stations/ Lee County current ratio (3) capita 0.00650 EMS calls/ Lee County current call load (4) capita (1) 1986 response time in the City of Naples was approximately the standard of service (actually 5.72 minutes), therefore the ratio of EMS units to Naples population is presumed to provide the level of service of 6 minute response time. Naples service units in 1986 - 1.19 units (365 calls in Naples/307 average calls per unit countywide) Naples population in 1986 = 18,343, therefore, 1.19 units/18,343 population = 0.00006 units/capita (2) 6 stations/132,084 population @ 9/30/87 (3) Ratio of Lee County 1986 peak population to EMS stations (4) M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development project "The Parklands," 10/17/85 - 30 - BOOK 058 nsE 113' EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES - LEVEL Of SERVICE STANDARD: 0.00006 LIMITS/CAPITA EMS LIMITS EMS UNITS EMS LIMITS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT YEAR (CO -VIDE PERM) 0.00006 IN CIP ............... S365,700 ............... 90-91 ............... ................ ............... ............... 156,850 9.4 0.0 9.0 ............... (0.4) (146,280) 91-92 167, Q% 10.0 0.0 9.0 0.0) (365,700) 92-93 179,263 10.8 1.0 (1) 10.0 (0.8) (292.560) 93.94 191.038 11.5 1.0 (2) 11.0 (0.5) (182,850) 94-95 202.813 12.2 1.0 (3) 12.0 (0.2) (73,10) 95-96 214,800 12.9 1.0 (4) 13.0 0.1 36,570 96.97 227,000 13.6 1.0 (5) 14.0 0.4 146,250 97-98 239,200 1G.1. 0.0 14.0 (0.4) (11.6,2501 98.99 251,400 15.1 0.0 14.0 (1.1) (402,270) 99-00 263,600 15.8 0.0 14.0 0.8) (658,260) 00-01 276.500 16.6 0.0 14.0 (2.6) (950,8201 01-02 290,101 17.4 0.0 14.0 (3.4) (1,243.380) EMS UNITS EMS LIMITS ENS LIMITS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR v o POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEf ICIE)ICY) (COST) AT x 1 TIME PERI CO (CO -VIDE PERM) 0.00006 IN CIP 1365,700 W L ~ PRESENT TO 167,488 10.0 0 9 (1.0) (365,700) .� 1 9/30/92 5 YEAR GROWTH 59,512 3.6 5 5 10/l/92-9/30/97 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 227.000 13.6 5 14 0.= IL6,c!O !r7 10/l/92-9/30/97 2ND 5-YR GROWTH 63.101 3.3 0 0 10/l/97-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 2". 101 17.4 � 5 IG (3.4) (1,243,3E0) 10/l/92-9/30/02 NOTE: The unit cost includes the cost of the station. EMS units, and asociated station equipment. PROJECTS: (1) Golden Gate Parkway L Airport Rd. (2) System Status Float Unit (3) EMS Substation and Vehicle Location To Be Determined (A) EMS Substation and Vehicle - Location To Be Determined (5) ENS Substation and Vehicle - Location To Be Determined 7 b l � t.;, f' DEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICT STATIONS AND APPARATUS POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: All County Residents X Other: Fire District Residents 2. Service Area: County -wide X Other: Fire Districts 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population = Isle of Capri = 1,005 Ochopee = 2,264 _ Peak Period Population _ Weighted Average of Permanent & Peak STANDARD OF SERVICE: x.xxxx apparatus & fire station per capita 0.00097 Isle of Capri/0.00057 Ochopee Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee 2.3 of present ratio of apparatus to population (1) Other Standards for Reference Standard Source Level of Service 7 or Collier County Comprehensive Plan (2) less, within 3 miles of a fire station 0.0001641 fire station/ Lee County current ratio (3) capita 0.0356 fire calls/capita Lee County current call load (4) 5 minute Countywide average response time from receipt of alarm to arrival - 3,251 ERU's per apparatus + 0.5 station (1) Isle of Capri = 1 apparatus/ 685 population x 2/3 = 0.00097 Ochopee = 2 apparatus/2,351 population x 2/3 = 0.00057 (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan, p.29. Service benchmarks for land use point rating.system (3) Ratio of Lee County 1986 unincorporated peak population to unincorporated stations (4) M.G. Lewis Econometrics memorandum re Lee County development project "The Parklands", 10/17/85 (5) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 Note: 1 ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) = 1 dwelling unit with 2.82 persons - 34 - BOOK 058 PAIA 117 ISLE Of CAPRI FIRE DISTRICT LEVEL Of SERVICE STANDARD: .DOO97 APPARATUS/ CAPITA POPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT S432,290 YEAR SERVICE AREA O-DOD97 IN CIP --------------- --------------- 90-91 --------------- 923 ---------------- 0.9 --------------- --------------- 0 --------------- 1 0.1 43.229 91-92 943 0.9 0 1 0.1 43,229 43,229 92-93 9" 0.9 0 1 0.1 0 93.94 985 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 94-95 1.005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 95.96 1,005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 96-97 1,005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 97-95 1.005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 90-99 1,005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 99-DO 1.005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 00-01 1.005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 01-02 1.005 1.0 0 1 0.0 POPULATION APPARATUS APPARATUS APPARATUS SURPLUS/ VALUE OR DISTRICT REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT Po o TIME PERIOD --------------- SERVICE AREA .00097/CAPITA ---------------• IN CIP --------------- ------------- ---------------- 5412,290/uNli ------------- PRESENT TO 943 0.9 0 1 0.1 43.229 OJT I 9/30/92 W 5 YEAR OROJTN 62 0.1 0 0 Ln 10/1/92-9/30/97 �y 1 SUB TOTAL BTOTAL 1,005 1.0 0 1 0.0 D 10/l/92-9/30/97 0. 2ND 5-TR CROWN 0 0.0 0 0 10/l/97.9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 1,005 1.0 0 1 0.0 0 10/1/92-9/30/02 N NOTE: The unit Cost inctudes the cost of the station, apparatus• and associated station ewipamt. 1 q. X1. ' JAIL l a'• POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2. Service Area: X County -wide _ Other: 3. Service Period: Permanent Population = 227,000 X Peak Period Population = 310,312 _ Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 6r0833 0,0024 beds per capita (1) Source of Standard: eeiiier-Bounty-SheriffLs-effice Office of Capital Protects Management/Corrections Committee Otber Standards for Reference Standard 0.0031 beds/capita Source Current Level of Collier County Service (2) 0.0010 beds/capita Lee County (3) 0.0029 beds/capita Seminole County (4) / (1) Based on inereaoe-in-average-det�y-jail-popn�nt#en-threngh 6epto2aber-4992-at-Dame-rate-es-peot-S4-montho-{Ragnst-�9B5-- January-1987} recommendations contained in the 1991 Corrections Committee Report (2) 565 beds - 182,501 peak population @ 9/30/87 (3) Lee County C_IP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.156, (based on 1986 service level) (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 39 LOOK 058 K' ZZ s LIBRARY COLLECTION 4 t NOTE: K;t. The CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee recommended excluding the library collection from the Capital Improvement Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan. POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: �'• 5 _ 2. Service Area: County -wide Other: 3. Service Period: _ _ Permanent Population = 227,000 _ Peak Period Population = 310,312 X Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 4-8-books-per-eepite books FY91/92 1.00 per capita FY92/93 1.05 books per capita FY93/94 1.10 books Rer capita FY94/95 1.15 books per capita FY95/96 1.20 books per capita FY96/97 1.25 books per capita Source of Standard: eepe-eitieenla-Advisory-•eemmittee Collier County Public Library Staff Other Standards for Reference Standard Source 0.99 volumes/capita Current Level of Collier County Service (1) 1.23 volumes/capita Lee County CIP (2) 1.50 volumes/capita Lee County Comprehensive Plan (3) 1.15 volumes/capita 1986 average of 7 systems (Brevard, Pasco, Sarasota, Seminole, Volusia, Central Florida Regional, & West Florida Regional) 1.00 volumes/capita Seminole County (4) Florida Library Association (5) 2.00 volumes/capita Level B for libraries serving 100,000 - 600,000 population 3.50 volumes/capita Level C for libraries serving 100,000 - 600,000 population (1) 148,000 volumes/148,722 population 0 9/30/87 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.159, (based on 1986 statewide average service level) (3) Lee County gomprehensive Plan, p.28 (4) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 (5) Standards and Guidelines for Florida Public Library Services, May, 1985 4 - 47 - s�F L WK 05.8 130 I:� i , C 5Y7.'. • (1) GOVERNMENT BUILDING * COST COMPONENTS AND AVERAGE COSTS (2) # COST COST COMPONENT COMPONENT A. Structure (sq.ft.) B. Furniture (open office system) C. Design (% of structure i furniture) D. Land (provided by Real Property) E. Parking (1 per 250 sq. ft. of structure) (3) (4) COST PER COST/FACILITY COMPONENT u X (3) $88.00 * (1) 21.00 * (2) 7.35 10.00 4.72 'S 1, ` AVERAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT $131.07(3)(4)(6) Sn= * (1) Includes minimal landscaping, carpet file and window covering. Does not include energy g• management systems, phones, or computers C * (2) Furniture costs are based on open office furniture systems, in accordance with Count policy, y p y, excludes interior demountable partitions (3) Includes meeting or exceeding fire code, and meeting or "�. exceeding all handicapped codes (handicap "friendly"). (Does not include sprinklers) (4) This is a square footage cost estimate and is subject to the type of occupant programmed into the structure. (Standard office space) (5) These figures are based on the following: *.' A. Recently completed construction projects at the Government Complex B. Estimations on projects currently being designed by multiple architectural firms on contract with the Board ! C. Reviewed by prominent Naples Architectural firms D. Reviewed by the largest architectural firm in the State of Florida E. Compared to major projects completed nationally F. Are compatible with government construction in other counties in close proximity to Collier County by our Growth Management Consultant r•`F' (6) Single story structure 53 BOOK 05.8eA,E136 M �MSIr�'kn FDRAINAGE r'J POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: X_ All County Residents _ Other: 2. Service Area: _X_ County -wide _ Other: 3. Service Period: X Permanent Population = 227,000 _ Peak Period Population = 310,312 Weighted :average of Permanent and Peak = 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: A County Surface Water Management Systems: Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. B Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels.of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee and the Collier County Stipulated Settlement Agreement with DCA. Other Standards for Reference Standard 0.0025 miles/capita Source Current Collier County miles/capita (1) 0.0006 miles/capita Lee County CIP (2) (1) 311 miles/123,893 population as of October 1, 1986 (2) Lee County CIP: 1986-87 - 1990-91, p.231 (based on 1986 urban unincorporated service level) I if - 54 - L 137 BOOK 058 PAGE CALCULATION OF DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS 1992-93 - 1996-97 I No standard has been identified for drainage canals and structures that "... indicate(s) the capacity per unit of demand ..." as required by State regulations. Drainage flows are traditionally measured by hydrologists in terms of "design storms" (e.g., 10-year 25-year, 100-year storms, etc.). Collier County has prepared a Stormwater Master Plan which identifies, at a planning level degree of accuracy, the ability of the various public water management facilities to pass the expected stormwater flows from various design storms. These design storms were based upon the existing and future land use for the various parts of the County. 4�ha•-project-tots}s-}feted-be}ox-{in-}sea-of-the-ttsan}-°ee}ca}etion-of Regnirementsu}-ref}set-the-reeemmended-p}nn-ef-nation-to-improve-the pnb}ie-rrnter-management-system-fnei}idea-far-the-ycnra-4994-}996- these-improvements-nre-identified-in-the-6tormHetcr-Master-P}en-es-e part-of-a-20-year-program- PReBBeT-Ner--- PRe3BeT-------------------------------------------- ee8? ---59}-------- Bistriet-Her-6-{be}y}---- - ------ --c-------- $--8-868-888 --- 292-------- Gordon-River-£xtension------------------------ 8-246-e8e --- 299-------- eeechatchee-River-System---------------------- 3-5357899 --- 294-------- Hain-Galden-Gate-System----------------------- 2,-83}7eee --- 295-------- Henderson-ereek-Basin--------------------------- 1607080 --- 296-------- Faka-Union-Basin------------------------------ 173457690 ---297-------- Southern-eoasta}-Basin-------------------------- 6997080 ---299-------- Barren -River -Basin ------------------------------- 537090 ---299-------- Hap}es-Park-Breinege-------------------------- 37+547999 -------------- eeuntywide-Tata}--------------------------- $-28,-056,-880 - 55 - -took 058 138 PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997: 1. Service Recipients: 2. Service Area: 3. Service Period: X All County Residents _ Other: X County -wide _ Other: X Permanent Population = Peak Period Population = _ Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 227,000 310,312 254,493 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 1.2882 acres of community park land/1000 population : 2.9412 acres of regional park land/1000 population : $122.00 of recreation facilities inventory value per capita Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee (1) (2) `t•... STANDARD „'- PER 1000 �^ TYPE OF FACILITY PERSONS Amphitheater 0.0118 Baseball Fields 0.0353 Basketball/Volleyball 0.1765 " Bicycle Trails: Miles 0.0553 Children's' Playgrounds 0.1059 Community Centers 0.0353 Community Pool 0.0059 Fitness Station Trails 0.0353 Football/Soccer Fields 0.0353 .:' Recreation Center 0.0059 ^;.`. Jogging Trails: Miles 0.0353 +i•'' Competition Pool 0.0059 Picnic Pavilions 0.0706 Racquetball Courts 0.1412 Shuffleboard Courts 0.0706 r:. Softball Fields 0.0706 Tennis Courts 0.0706 'Track and Field 0.0059 rt Boat Ramps 0.1059 , TOTAL wr� - (3) REQUIRED FOR 9/30/97 POP. 227,000 2.7 8.0 40.0 12.6 24.0 8.0 1.3 8.0 8.0 1.3 8.0 1.3 16.0 32.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 1.3 24.0 (4) VALUE PER UNIT 100,000 530,000 22,800 28,900 33,500 834,000 695,200 76,000 325,000 2,000,000 28,500 1,500,000 37,300 71,300 21,500 345,000 48,000 221,000 228,000 Value per capita (Value/227,000 population) $ 57 s, WK 058 PAcf 140 (5) TOTAL VALUE 270,000 4,240,000 912,000 364,140 804,000 6,672,000 903,760 608,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 228,000 1,950,000 596,800 2,281,600 344,000 5,520,000 768;000 287,350 5,472,000 36,509,650 160.84 I A, i' WL ii : {t1 `r( FACILITIES PER 1,000 PERSONS STANDARDS y-, COUNTY FRPA* OTHER TYPE OF FACILITY STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD +" Amphitheater 0.0118 0.04 k#. Baseball Fields 0.0353 0.17 0.17 (2) k7(,, 0.02 (4 ) "'. Basketball/Volleyball 0.1765 0.02 0.04 (2) Courts 0.02 (4) #' Bicycle Trails: Miles 0.0553 1.00 Children's' Playgrounds 0.1059 1.00 (5) Community Centers 0.0353 0.067(6) Community Park: ac 1.2882 2.00 2.00 (2) Community Pool 0.0059 Fitness Station Trails 0.0353 0.10 0.13 (5) "+ Football Fields 0.0353 0.25 0.25 (2) 0.05 (4) i.�,:•' Recreation Center 0.0059 Jogging Trails: Miles 0.0353 0.50 Competition Pool 0.0059 0.04 0.04 (2) 0.05 (4 ) Picnic Pavilions 0.0706 0.05 (5) Racquetball Courts 0.1412 0.10 0.01 (2) '• 0.05 (4) tiFk''s, Regional Park: acres 2.9412 20.00 20.00 (2) 5.00 (3) i#. Shuffleboard Courts 0.0706 0.20 0.02 (2 ) 0.45 (5) Soccer Fields 0.0353 0.25 0.25 (2) et " 0.01 (4) `:. Softball Fields 0.0706 0.30 0.17 (2) "J<: ' 0.02 (4) � Tennis Courts 0.0706 0.50 0.05 (2) 0.25 (3) 0.02 (7) Track and Field 0.0059 0.05 (4) y+ Boat Ramps - Freshwater 0.0529 25.00** 3.03 (8) Boat Ramps - Saltwater 0.1118 25.00** 3.03 (8) Boat Ramps - Combined 0.1059 3.03 (8) �x" * FRPA a Florida Recreation and Parks Association Standards are per 1,000 registered boats (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan quoting outdoor Recreation in Florida, 1981 as a guideline. �• (3) Lee County CIP: 1986-97 - 1990-91 (based on County Comprehensive Plan (4) National Recreation and Parks Association (5) Kansas City, Missouri (6) Jackson, Tennessee ''- (7) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards," October 17, 1986 fitr,, (a) Florida Department of Natural Resources: 1 lane/300 boats 58 - 058 PALE 141 �y t �? �15 PARKS AND RECREATION: CL1rRa(ITY PARKS ACRES LEVEL Of SERVICE STANDARDS 1.2582/1000 POP - POPULATION COW PC ACRES COW PK ACRES COW PK ACRES SURPLUS/ tfoultED FISCAL CO-UIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) SSCOST SAT YEAR PERMANENT 0.00126E2 IN CIP --------------- •........... ............... . 90-91 - 156,950 --------------- 202.1 -------------- 0 258.0 55.9 5,01,963 91-92 167,48E 215.E 32' 290.0 74.2 5.853,575 92-93 179,263 230.9 0 290.0 59.1 6,263.163 93-94 191,03E 246.1 0 290.0 43.9 6,675,463 94.95 202,813 261.3 0 290.0 23.7 7.087.763 95-96 214,500 276.7 0 290.0 13.3 7,505,43E 96-97 227,000 292.4 32'• 322.0 29.6 7.931,350 97-98 239,200 308.1 0 322.0 13.9 8.357,213 98-99 251.400 323.9 0 322.0 322.0 0.9) (17.6) 3.785.788 9.211,650 99-00 263,600 276,500 339.6 356.2 0 0 322.0 (34.2) 9.661,925 00-01 01-02 290,101 373.7 0 322.0 (51.7) 10.136,613 POPULATION CON PK ACRES COMM PK ACRES COW PK ACRES SURPLUS/ CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) TIME PERIOD PERMANENT 0.00126E2 ---IN CIP --------- .......... .... . ,,,,_...... v ( ------------ --------------- OI PRESENT TO 167,4E8 216 32 290 74 0 9/30/92 1 5 YEAR GRCUTN 59,512 77 32 32 10/1/92.9/30/97 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 227.000 292 64 322 30 _ to/l/92-9/30/97 2N0 5-YR GROWTH 63,101 81 0 0 y� 10/l/97.9/30/02 W. 10 YEAR TOTAL 290,101 374 32 322 (52) 10/1/92-9/30/02 ' -Land Acquisition For CoimanitV Perk 06 Location: South Naples' -Land Acquisition for Community Park 99 - Location: To Be Determined CIP PLANNED TOTAL AVAILABLE SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) COST ............... ----------- _ 0 ___.VALUE ..... 6,998,250 1,512,6M 868,000 7,866,250 2.012.675 D 7'�'n0 7 0 7,866.250 1, 190,78E 0 7,866,250 773.486 0 7,E66,250 360.763 668.000 8,734250 802,900 0 E.734:250 377,03E 0 6,734,2" (51,538) 0 E.734,250 (477.400) 0 a.T34,250 (927,673) 0 8,734,250 (1,402,363) E 1 1 Y r 3. REVENUE FORECASTS There are thirteen (13) sources of revenue that Collier County will use to pay for its capital improvements for public facilities. Eleven (11) of the revenue sources are "restricted" in that they can be used only for specific types of public facilities. The fifth and thirteenth sources of revenue, Commercial Paper and Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue Fund) can be used for any type of public facility. The revenue sources are presented in the same sequence as the facility requirements calculations in order to relate the "restricted" revenues to the appropriate costs. In the forecasts listed below, each source of revenue is listed with the amount that is estimated to be received by the County from October 1, 1992 through September 30, 1997. As a general rule, revenue fore- casts are based on recent actual collections, statistical trend analysis and a 4% annual growth factor in building permit issuance. There is no inflation factor in the revenue forecasts. ROAD REVENUES 1. Gas Taxes $ 7,561,000 2. Road Impact Fees 34,765,000 3. MSTD (Livingston Road) 16,000,000 4. Revenue Bonds 50,967,000 3; 5. Commercial Paper Program 11,608,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUES =s 6. System Development Fees/User Fees 15,530,000 SOLID WASTE REVENUES 7. Landfill User Fees 19,408,000 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 8. Emergency Medical Services Impact Fees 1,728,000 JAIL 9. General Obligation Bonds 26,242,000 LIBRARY REVENUES 10. Library Impact Fees 3,652,000 4 GOVERNMENT BUILDING REVENUES 0 DRAINAGE REVENUES 0 "✓' PARKS AND RECREATION REVENUES 11. Florida Boating Improvement Program 850,000 K:r 12. Parks Impact Fees 17,282,600 UNRESTRICTED REVENUE 13. Ad Valorem Taxes: Capital Revenue Fund 6,677,400 TOTAL $212,271,000 - 64 - 600K 058 14,f7 M M M 4 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS One of the most important requirements of the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan is that it must be financially feasible. In accordance with Chapter 9J-5.016, F.A.C., the County must be able to afford the standards of service that it adopts. The preliminary test of the financial feasibility of the County's standards of service is presented below. It compares the estimated cost of required public facilities from Chapter 2 to the revenue forecasts from Chapter 3. The relative priority of need among facility types is based on two variables. First of all, Category A facilities which are linked to the issuance of development orders (e.g, roads, water, sewer, solid waste, drainage, and parks) as a group will have a higher priority than other facility types (Category B) in order to assure that concurrency requirements are met. The second variable is the type of revenue used to support each facility type. There are revenue restrictions among the above mentioned six facility types which prevent the County from using surplus funds from one facility type to fund another facility type. Water, sewer and solid waste facilities are each financed through enterprise funds. This means that like a private business, the costs of providing goods and services are financed primarily by user fees. Surplus revenues generally cannot be utilized to finance other types of facilities. Road projects are to be funded with gas tax, impact fee, MSTD, Revenue Bonds and Commercial . Paper revenues. Again, these revenues are levied/charged for a special purpose and cannot be used to fund revenue deficits relating to other facility types. Drainage projects when funded will be special revenue funds levied for a special or specific purpose. Because of the restrictiveness of revenues by facility type prioritiz- ation of need among them will not help in eliminating deficiencies caused by a lack of revenue or capacity since surplus revenues for one facility type cannot generally be used to fund deficiencies in other facility types. Appendix B of the Capital Improvement Element includes a Capital Improvement Schedule of Projects (Table 2). Within each facility type all projects are identified as either providing required capacity for existing deficiencies (as of 09-30-92) and future growth or for future growth. Within each facility type the schedule of projects prioritizes projects in order to first eliminate existing deficiencies. In the following table of costs and revenues each restricted revenue source is first compared to the cast of the facilities to which the revenue is restricted. If the revenue .is greater than the cost, the "surplus" of revenue is shown as a reserve for future projects or expansion of capacity for future growth. If, however, the restricted revenue is less than the cost, the "deficit" for that type of public facility will be added to the deficits from other types of public 65 - r ' 'Y WK 058PA 148 -a, l M M M M facilities in order to determine the county -wide deficit of costs after crediting all restricted revenues. The county -wide deficit is then compared to unrestricted revenue, and a final surplus or deficit is calculated. If the bottom line is a surplus (or zero), the plan is financially feasible; if the bottom line is a deficit, the plan is not financially feasible and will need to be adjusted by: 1. reducing the levels of service; 2. increasing revenues; 3. reducing the cost and quality of facilities; or 4. any combination of the first three. In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY ARTERIAL i COLLECTOR ROADS LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes Road Impact Fees MSTD (Livingston Road) Revenue Bonds (Series FY94) STATE ROADS NETWORK LESS Commercial Paper Program DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS .WATER i SEWER SYSTEMS LESS System Development Fees/user Fees SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL LESS Solid Waste User Fees $ 109,293,000 $ 7,561,000 34,765,000 16,000,000 50,967,000 109,293,000 Balance 0 11,608,000 11,608.000 Balance 0 Balance 0 15,530,000 15,530,000 Balance 0 19,408,000 19,408,000 Balance 0 PARRS i RECREATION 25,176,000 LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees 17,282,600 Boating Improvement Program 850,000 18,132,600 Deficit ( 4,815,400) - 66 EooK 058 w! 149 1 a �� LANK CORKSCREW [yTwiES j ) . �}"lll i RURAL ESTATES f } N A GaN v i o i ' � SR. S• 1 MAP_CS r -AST cp S 00 I saunN � 1 1 APLiS ROYAL FAKAPALM vo GJ d .D:co ? qA uMCO rr JIN N Cf� 0Qp S�wL-E OQ D pq EELT Rc O Sul, lout U U 0 o aaaa min owa n..... NKr.recrt • of antra. cow rY m.w.n o[waPraT Na.+aw 7/�/l1 />lL: Nti-.oOtD.e PLANNING COMMUNITIES COWER COUNTY. FLORIDA UmomCARPORA.TLD NCdMCYtA7FD I. MORTM MAPLES 13, MAPLES 2 CENTRAL NAMIS it ELERGi'M OTY 1 CCLIX/l CAW LAST MAPLES S. SOUTM MAPLES E YARCO 7. ROYAL FAKA—PAIN CRM & RURAL ESTAICS L UR M ESTATES IQ CORKSCREW %I. M.CKALEC 12. MO CYPRESS INC CYPRESS r� u 1 M M LIST OF TABLES C� Table f Title 1 Collier County Capital Improvements Costs 2 Collier County Capital Improvement Schedule of Projects 3 Net Operating Cost Impact BOOK 05'8 154 TABI3 2 CATEGORY A , SEWER PROJECTS1 COLLIER COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ZIMMM i(000) Project Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Future Total --------------------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- — — — ----- ------ ----- 912 10" Force Main Davis Blvd. (COMPLETED) Pump Station 14 to Pump station 11 913 Davis Blvd. Pump Station No. (COMPLETED) ' 14 914 20" Force Hain CR-951/US 41 (COMPLETED) Pump Station 18 to Pump P Station 1 O 915 Davis Blvd. Pump Station No. (COMPLETED) 18 Q 916 South County Reg. Treatment (COMPLETED) Facility Expansion 917 North County Reg. Treatment (C) 4100 2560 6600 Facility Expansion 918 20" Force Haan - (COMPLETED) Rattlesnake -Hammock Road - i CR-951 to Polly Avenue , 800 919 Rattlesnake -Hammock Road - (C) 100 700 Pump Station 20 920 CR-951 Pump Station No. 16 (COMPLETED) (B) - Existing Deficiency and Future Growth (C) - Future Growth 1� �;. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) i� RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS T01992-97 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS SERVICE AREA: County -wide X_ or Planning District or Special Area _ DEFICIENCY: 277.5 Lane - Mile �,,-,,,.­1992-97 ,.;; (quantity) (unit of measurement) f F�l pf'Size of �,• Project This Cumulative Number Project Name Project Total lllth Ave (US 41 to Vanderbilt --- --- k '' Drive 2 Airport -Pulling Road (Phase I) COMPLETE --- --- * _ (Radio Road to Golden Gate Parkway) 3 Airport -Pulling Road (Phase II) COMPLETE 3.6 3.6 (US 41 to Radio Road) 4 Davis Blvd. (Santa Barbara Blvd. COMPLETE --- 3.6 to County Barn Road) v 5 Golden Gate Parkway (CR-851 to 2.8 6.4 to CR-31) .i:. 6 Immokalee Road (US 41 to I-75) 7.0 13.4 `I- 8 CR-846 (I-75 to CR-951) --- 13.4 10 CR-951 (US 41 to Rattlesnake 6.8 20.2 Hammock Road) 11 CR-951 (CR-864 to SR-84) 6.2 26.4 12 Isles of Capri Road (SR-951) COMPLETE 0.0+* 26.4 f (US 41 to Marco Bridge) 13 CR-951 (23rd Avenue S.W. to COMPLETE --- 26.4 Golden Gate Blvd.) I .,' 14 Pine Ridge Road (US 41 to CR-31) 4.2 30.6 15 Radio Road (CR-31 to Santa 6.4 37.0 Barbara Blvd.) 16 Radio Road (Santa Barbara Blvd. --- 37.0 to Davis Blvd.) ' 17 Rattlesnake Hammock Road (US 41 to 4.0 41.0 Polly Avenue) ' 19 Goodlette-Frank Road (Carica Road COMPLETE --- 41.0 rr to CR-846) 20 Gulf Shore Drive (Vanderbilt DELETE --- 41.0 Beach Road to lllth Avenue) C a> '$ 05*8 PAGE 182 eoox M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1999-97 DEFICIENCY DEPARTXENT:.IRANSPORTATION DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS SERVICE AREA: County -wide X or Planning District or Special Area 1992-97 DEFICIENCY: 277.5 Lane - Mile (quantity) (unit of measurement) Size of Project This cumulative Number Protect Name Project Total 21 Livingston Road (CR-846 to 12.4 53.4 Imperial and E-W Route) 22 Santa Barbara/Logan (CR-896 to' 2.0 55.4 South of Green Canal) 23 Vanderbilt Beach Road (US 41 to 4.4 59.8 CR -31) 24 Vanderbilt Beach Road (Oaks Blvd. COMPLETE --- 59.8 to CR-951) 25 Vanderbilt Drive (111th Avenue --- 59.8 to Bonita Beach Road) 26 Westclock Road (Carson Road to 2.0 61.8 SR-29) 27 Major Road Reconstruction --- 61.8 28 Major Traffic signal Installations --- 61.8 29 Completed --- 61.8 30 Completed 61.8 3*1 Bonita Beach Road (Vanderbilt 3.2 65.0 Drive to County Line) 32 Santa Barbara Blvd. (Davis Blvd. 8.0 73.0 to Rattlesnake Hammock Road) 33 County Barn Road (Davis Blvd. to 4.0 77.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Road) 34 Advanced R.O.W. Acquisition --- 77.0 35 Carson Road (Lake Trafford Road COMPLETE --- 77.0 to Immokalee Drive) 36 New N-S Road (CR-858 to CR-846) COMPLETE --- 77.0 37 Isles of Capri Road (CR-951) --- 77.0 (Golden Gate Blvd. to CR-846) 38 Pedestrian overpass on SR-29 COMPLETE 77.0 at Farm Workers Village 05'8 PAQ 183 Y , l CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1992-97 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROAPS yf SERVICE AREAL County -wide __X- or Planning District or special Area 1992-97 DEFICIENCY: 277.5 Lane - Mile } (quantity) (unit of measurement ''f•!. Size of r- Project This cumulative .�•; Number Protect Name Proiect Total 39 Airport -Pulling Road (Golden Gate 5.2 82.2 Parkway to Pine Ridge Road' including grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway) T`* 40 Goodlette-Frank Road (Golden Gate _ --- 82,2 iay Parkway to Solana Road) 41 Pine Ridge Road (Airport Road to ---82,2 I-75 including grade separation of Airport Road) 42 Vanderbilt Beach Road (US 41 to 2.8 85.0 "rY. .. Gulf Shore Drive) ), 43 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) (Davis DELETE 0.0* 85.0 . Blvd. to Airport Road) 44 Tamiami Trail North (US 41) 0.0* 85.0 (Grade separation at Pine Ridge W's�^ tidh,. Road) 45 Tamiami Trail North (US 41) DELETE 0.0* 85.0 Immokalee Road to Laurel Oak Drive '• 46 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) DELETE 0.0* 85.0 Tt (Rattlesnake Hammock Road to Barefoot Wms. Road) 47 Tamiami Trail East (US 41) DELETE 0.0* 85.0 (Airport Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road) a 48 Davis Blvd. (SR-84) (Airport Road DELETE --- 85.0 to Kings Lake Blvd.) 49 Davis Blvd. (SR-84) (Kings Lake DELETE --- 85.0 Blvd. to County Barn Road) �t 50 Tamiami Trail North (US 41) 0.0* 85.0 (Immokalee Road to Wiggins Pass) C Igbs�t; �58PA.4 eooK .. � 84 nft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT ' Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) f�C . F RECONCILIATION OF PROJECTS TO 1992-97 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION —_ _ DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION SERV ;TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ROADS SERVICE 3r` AREAt County -wide X or Planning District or Special Area _ r 1992-97 DEFICIENCY: 277.5 Lane - Mile (quantity) (unit of measurement) Prciect Size • of This Cumulative Number yro ject Name Protect Total 51 SR-951 0.0• 85.0 New York Drive to Marco -Bridge 52 Livingston Road 2.5 87.5 Pine Ridge to Golden Gate Parkway 53 Livingston Road 1.5 89.0 e'•'. Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road �+ "±54 Bald Eagle Drive --- 89.0 ;f, . North & South of US 41 55 Airport -Pulling Road 2.0 91.0 -" - Vanderbilt Beach Road to Pine Ridge Road 56 Santa Barbara Boulevard --- 91.0 Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road ' 57 Livingston Road --- 91.0 ?> Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road 58 Livingston Road --- 91.0 Vanderbilt Beach Road to Pine Ridge Road 59 North lath Street (Immokalee) 0.3 91.3 t: Roberts Avenue to SR 29 i J t 1 .A State Roads do not add to County inventory *a Right of Way acquisition does not add to County inventory a� •` t 4` BOOK 058 FA,-! 185 1?' �k't^ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FOR TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT I PROJECT NAME: 111th AVENUE '�"CDESCRIPTION: US 41 TO VANDERBILT DRIVE (4 LANING) 1.2 MILES i" PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) K�,'RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction LAD& Construction other Total - ��.Prior .1991-92 ,Forecast 230 115 345 1092;;93 ,'Budget Year �199394 94-95 600 600 95-;96 2,300 115 2,415 Total 230 600 2,300 230 3,360 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY ;"First Year of Impact N/A '.Cost per Unit 4Xumber of Units 20 I Gross Cost (years) Less User Revenue Nst Impact BOOK 05*8 m186 A .1. , r.l' lQi CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update A Amendment (1992) PROJECT_ SUMMARY FORM H . i TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT , _3, PROJECT NAME: AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD (PHASE II) DESCRIPTION: ITS 41 TO RADIO ROAD (6 LANING): 1.8 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY E ."Ns. l"I,DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE 1•DSPARTMENTt TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ?'f ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 3.6 .G:1•"+r;' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) a G. Pre- . + Construction Land Construct%n Other �� to Total Rrior 260 260 '1991-92 170 150 1,580 100 2,000 Forecast 1992-93 100 100 Budget Year 1993-94 .. fir.. 1994-95 1995-96 �'1996-97 % 5..... , Future Total ;> 430 150 1,580 200 2,360 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY ;;'First Year of Impact 92/93 rCost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units f ': (- 3 .6 �cL .;;Gross Cost $ 6.210 (years) } .',;Less User Revenue - 0 Not Impact $ 6,210 BOOK 058 PAGE 187 C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT iF 5 ""PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR-8861 DESCRIPTION: CR-851 TO CR-31 (6 LANINGI. 1.4 MILES INCLUDING GRAD_ SEPARATION AT AIRPORT ROAD �c r{' :PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES .r q1 • (1) (Planning District Name) 0'`:: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY n`14�, DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE :"+, DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 yA ' -,YORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.8 r'.';-,•" . FINANCIAL SUMMARY" ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro- ­.',Year gonstruction Land Construction other Total Prior 392 392 .,:,1991-92 140 140 yForecast, 1992-93 80o Soo Budget Year `1993�-94 1,000 2,800 140 3,940 1994-95 1 995-96 t 1996-97 `,.iture 443 8,000 1,000 9,443 Total 835 1,800 10,800 1,280 14,715 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL r +' LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 .'Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 2.8 2_ 'Gross Cost $ 4,830 (years) a ,,Less User Revenue - 0 ;,Net Impact $ 4.830 `, aooK 05*8 PAGE 188 g'.' � A• � 3 , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT } 6 PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR-8461 rpvF; DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO I-75 (4 LANING): 3.5 MILES F a; PROJECT LOCATION: 1 & 9 NORTH NAPLES: URBAN ESTATES lP• (if) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION a,• F '.'DEFARTXENT: TRANSPORTATION °OR0 ZATION: SECONDARY ROADS IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 Size of This Project: 7.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - •ear Construction Land Construction Other Total 9,2�1 'Prior 568 168 736 199.1-92 175 800 6,500 100 7,575 ra Forecast 1992-93 200 200 "8udget,Year 1993-94 14 9 4't, 9 5 q '7�y»:Far 1995-96 `1996=97' luture �MT •H� Y Total 743 968 6,500 300 8,511 };'.,„•—IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL �+i- •, LIFE OF FACILITY 3'Dirst Year of Impact 92/93 'Cost per Unit $ 1.725 "Number of Units 7.0 20 Gross Cost $ 12.075 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 12.075 F 1r �rr k 44,,t '? CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 1 NM e, _8 ,�','PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR-8461 DESCRIPTION: I-75 TO CR-951 (4 LANINGI: 3.4 MILES "''PROJECT LOCATION: _9 URBAN ESTATES (1) (Planning District Name) n. ', RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY yDIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurements _ LANE MILE .DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) Pre - ..'Year, Construction Land Construction Other Total -Prior 41 s1991-92 450 450 .Forecast,: 1992-93 .' 150 150 8udgat.Year 4.i;: 1993--94 325 325 ,1994-95 1995-96 9,96-`qq9r7- Future ;' 325 5,400 200 5,925 :Total450 650 5,400 350 6,850 " -IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL 'Yirst'Year of Impact N/A LIFE OF FACILITY ;Cost per Unit $ ,YNumber of Units 20 "'.,Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Not Impact $ �l Y- 60DK 058 PAGE 190 .�t.t 3 fin+• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM 3,TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY$ COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 10 �a rPROJECT NAME$ CR-951 ,DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD (4 LANING): 3.4 MILES i� PROJECT LOCATION: 5 & 7 SOUTH NAPLES: ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK . (1) (Planning District Name) .4'RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ,-DIVISION$ TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE W DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 `'ORGANIZATION: =NDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 6.8 A, FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) 44 Pre - ,,.,year Construction Land Construction Other Total i?;Brior 287 140 427 ,J991-92 25 200 225 'rorecast 1992-93 Budget.Year 1.1993 94. 5,400 200 5,600 1994-95,;: 1995-96 ,. 1996=97. �lltur®. G. R ot al.',` 312 of 340 5,400 200 6,252 a,' '� IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL r; 7e-', '' LIFE OF FACILITY ;Pirst�Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 6.8 r Gross Cost $ 11,730 (y�) LossUser Revenue $- NotImpact 11,730 •°;��';,;`' BOOK PAGE 058 191 r , r' �o CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ..TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT .;PROJECT NAME: CR-951 =;DESCRIPTION: CR-864 TO SR-84 (4 LANING); 3.1 MILES ;.PROJECT LOCATION: 3. 5 & 7 GOLDEN GATE; SOUTH NAPLES; ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (f) (Planning District Name) _ 9,RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE t� DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 s:ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 6.2 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year; - Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 220 220 1991-92 25 25 `Forecast 1992-93;*,t ' 250 250 adgit Year 94 , i1993 wF � 1994-95. 5,000 250 5,250 1995=9+6 1996-97 Future tal 245 250 5,000 250 5,745 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS 7 t Year of Impact 95/96 ,Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 6.2 Gross Cost $ 10.695 Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 10.695 �' .. aooK (�8 Pace 192 F( yam. ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) 1. .� y ,y T CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ;. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 14 PROJECT NAME: PINE RIDGE ROAD cL':,'DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO CR-31 (6 LANINGI: 2.1 MILES INCLUDING URBAN INTERCHANGE AT AIRPORT ROAD 'PROJECT LOCATION: 1 & 2 NORTH NAPLES: CENTRAL NAPLES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY {>`iDIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE .DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY_ ROADS Size of This Project: 4.2 FJf'' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- X2ar Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 221 221 1991-92-} 250 2,100 200 2,550 Forecast 1992=93 YBudget Year 3993-94 q,. . 1,500 1,500 1994-95•" 1995 96 r 9�9.y6-97 %i 8,950 8,950 tore. i 4'a.^ter, ';,Total-` 221 1,750 11,050 200 13,221 41 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 92193 "Cost per Unit $ 1,725 >Number of Units 4.2 20 .,Gross Cost $ 7,245 (years) ,Less User Revenue - 0 _.Net Impact $ 7,245 600K 058 9 � Av r '} CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT F 15 PROJECT NAME: RADIO ROAD DESCRIPTION: CR-31 TO SA NTA BARB}1RA'BLVD, (4 LANING): 3.0 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: 2, 3 & 4 CENTRAL NAPLES: GOLDEN GATE: EAST NAPLES M (Planning District Name) y.Y ,,RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE F"DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 `'�'O,RGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) is f` • .. Pre - ''Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior-, 382 120 502 ii 1991-92.': "Forecast' 480 4,300 200 4,980 1992-93 budggt. Year 1993=`94 ; 1994-95 �'1995-96 Future rTotal,`;, : 382 600 4,300 200 5,482 4S(r'=;,-IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 92193 Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 6.4 20 (cross Cost $ 11,040 (years) Less.User Revenue - 0 Nit Impact $ 11,040 r BOOK O58 PAGE 194 h ff CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT , _17 PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD DESCRIPTION: US 41 TO POLLY AVENUE (4 LANINGI: 2.0 MILES 'PROJECT LOCATION: 4 & 5 EAST NAPLES: SOUTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) kA'# r6SPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:. TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE EPARTHENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Site of This Project: 4.0 E : FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- x2AZ Construction Land Construction 76 s 1991 792,Y , 400 orecast' Budget•, Year �w19 3": 94 1,500 1994-95 995a 96 +A , 1996=97:�� Q ttl�� '; ]•s, 476 1,500 -jJXPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS iirst Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 4.0 Gross Cost $ 6,900 Less User Revenue - 0 Now'impact $ 61900 6,000 Other Total 76 200 600 300 7,800 6,000 500 8,476 uy WK O P46E�J� Y, L� ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) .41 CAPITAL_IMPR09EMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM c TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT , _ 71 PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTON ROAD (NORTH NAPLES MSTU1 DESCRIPTION: CR-846 OLD 41: TO IMPERIAL STREET + AN E-W ROUTE CONNECTING _TO 6.2 MILES 2 LANES: PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES ?! (1) (Planning District Name) AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY IMPONSIBLE DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE ��rrDPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277,5 `ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 12.4 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro- XA instruction Land Construction Other Total PXior. 710 1,400 2,110 F1991-92 300 250 550 orecast 992-93 2,000 14,000 300 16,300 Budget; Year 993-94�`-. I994 95 995 96; 1,010 3,650 14,000 300 18,960 I(J.M ,IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY irst•Year of Impact 93/94 Cost',per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 12,4 20 rGross Cost $ 21,390 (years) Lass.°User Revenue - 0 t Impact $ 21,390 058 PAGE 197 aooK 't� M IT I t' µ • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM a TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT / 22 PROJECT NAME: SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD/LOGAN BOULEVARD "•DESCRIPTION: CR-896 TO SOUTH OF GREEN CANAL: 4 LANES: 1.0 MILES -PROJECT LOCATION: 3 S 9 GOLDEN GATE: URBAN ESTATES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 0RGANI2ATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.0 )+`w" FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) 4,r?f)v Pre- Year Construction k4AA Construction Other Total ,Prior 177 - 177 - u 991-92„; 160 Fcrscast 180 100 440 P t �tV t'�.��k'�• h 992;�-93' .' . 30 30 bidgat^Year, 993-94•`.. 2,100 100 2,200 1994 95 4 1i95-96 996=97, Total';s; 190 357 2,100 200 2,847 " 'IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL <¢.<. LIFE OF FACILITY ?first Year of Impact 94/95 Coat per Unit $ 1,725 2lumber of Units 2.0 20_ can Cost $ 3,450 (years) t'Less User Revenue - 0 Net'Impact $ 3,450 NFL , ' p Q5 PAGE 19H BOOK s k„k~ rx �i"� •t . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) air PROJECT SUMMARY FORM YPS OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 1 23 ROJECT NAME: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD ESCRIPTION: US_41 T9_ CR-31:'4__LANE51_:_ 2-.2_ MILES___ _ ROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES ({) (Planning District Name) tEBPONSIBLB AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY N�. )MBIONC, TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE )SPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 )RGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 4.4 Y4� FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - MAX -- Construction Land Construction Other TSQtal ?rior 65 65 1991-92 '- 400 75 475 ?orecast �rrt 1992-93 500 75 575 BudgetYear 9.93 941.; 1,600 3,800 150 5,550 1994-95 1995-96 996,r� 9J7 �� 465 2,100 3,800 300 6,665 Itla CT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Sr of Impact 94195 st'per Unit S 1,725 aber of Units 4.4 owcost $ 7,590 "s Uzer Revenue - 0 t,.Impact $ 7,590 BOOK 058 PAU �iJJ ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) r a tri ' i r - CCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT r, Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT * 75 PROJECT NAME: VANDERBILT DRIVE DESCRIPTIONS lllth AVENUE TO BONITA BEACH ROAD (4 LANING): 3.9 MILES PROJECT LOCATION: I NORTH NAPLES (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DI92SI0NI TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE *, f. DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) tA,M x Pro - Construction Land Constructio:} Other Total Dior: 017:91 Y '- ;, 375 150 525 dget";Year 93944 375 150 525 ,; r 9 4�95''" +c7�• uyK�{ 5 96 �h •946=97; ' YLlture 1,500 9,000 10,500 Tota3,,". 750 1,500 9,000 300 11,550 ry-�Ys,IJMACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY first Year of Impact N/A Cost' -per Unit $ Number.; of Units 20 'Gro,ss'Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - et,,Impact $ '3 ' + P�cc 058 200 aAi r 9 E+F{ 1 Via• 4 "'R •� i f r� 3 �.s p �Yi r; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT f 26 PROJECT. NAME: WESTCLOCK ROAD `rS ESCRIPTION: CARSON ROAD TO SR-29 (2 LANES): 1.0 MILES 4S• PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKALEE ;. (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION:. TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE E?ARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 RGANIZATION : SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($•IN THOUSANDS) Pre- '{ Construction Land ConstructYon Other Total or',., . 50 30 80 1991-92 20 150 650 50 870 Forecast 992-93`. 50 50 dget- ;Year' p 3 ,1- 4 i t 1, - 995=96�� 91m 96-97 *.105-i`r t3�]X 70 i50 650 piX IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ,�,:..•: rst'.-Year of Impact 92193 st.per Unit $ 1,725 mber,'of Units 2.0 Oso:`Cost $ 3,450 so User Revenue - 0 t^Impact $ 3,450 �'-;rat': :;• 600K 050 201 ;h•� PAGf 130 1,000 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT RROJECT NAME: MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION (ROAD b BRIDGE SECTION) DESCRIPTION: AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER BCC APPROVED ROAD PROGRAM tiROJECT LOCATION: (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE EPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY-($ IN THOUSANDS) �? Pro - Construction Land construction other Total PFior 2,463 2,463 91 92 Forecast tidget.Year 993 94 r 307 307 994-95 630 630 1995-96`!`" ` 628 628 600 600 ura,° 3,580 3,580 Total° 8,208 8,208 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL ,�', •, ` LIFE OF FACILITY irat--Year I of Impact N/A Cost: per Unit $ zthimbor of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Net Impact $ db p 500K O58 PAGE 202 4�1 f'+ Y 1 �: r a�«ry ; as CAPITAL IMPROV EMENT -KUM= Fourth Annual Update A Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE 07 PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT % 28 PROJECT NAME:' MAJOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION: AT VARIOUS LOCATION$ PER BCC A IMOJZCT LOCATION: (Planning RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY TRANSPORTATION Unit Of Measurement: LANE MTT,E TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size Of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction LADA Construction Other 1,408 -92 -93 11 it Yea , r 97 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS it�Year of Impact NIA porunit of. Units is Cost' - iUser Revenue , 12, bm 058 PAGE 203 rvf. 490 605 630 600 3,000 6,733 Total 1,408 490 605 630 600 3,000 6,733 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE Or FACILITY - 20 (years) 1 i Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) YPE.OF.PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 1 31 ROJECT NAME: BONITA BEACH ROAD ESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT DRIVE TO COUNTY LTHE (4 ANTNPI. 1 6 MILE s� (HALF IN LEE COUNTY) SOJECT LOCATION: _ 1 NORTH NAPL.ES (Planning District Name) LISTONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ))VISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE Vt"A: )EPARTXZNT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: _ 277.5 I3ATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 3.2 kA = FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- X Construction Land Construction ,r .Or' li=92 500 46ast'. 93 800 4 9(5 96 al °` 500 S00 jDWACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS st3Year of Impact 94195 t:par Unit $ 1,725 liar of Units 3.2 ss Cost $ 5.520 s User Revenue - 0 ;Impact $ _ 5.520 y s BOOK 058 PAGZ4 r Other Total 500 800 2,750 200 2,950 2,750 200 4,250 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY �_ (years) yR•�7 /h TRH v 1 { t Wf li CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM YPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 32 ` ROJECT NAME: SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD ESCRIPTION: DAVIS BLVD, (SR-84) TO RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD (4 NEW LANES): 2.0 MILES_ ROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES k,�'b • : (f) (Planning District Name) LESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 1IVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE MPARTNENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 *dANI3ATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 8.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY'($ IN THOUSANDS) I Pro - Construction Land Construct-ian Other Total Prior �,-;�•` L991=92 ,."' ,' 330 100 430 rorec]jCa�yt 92 93.` 50 50 Budoet'Year 1b- 94-95,,df>?' 1,400 1,400 995 96 3,000 150 3,150 why. 's m6ta'" 330 1,400 3,000 300 5,030 .r ;IM��: PACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL pir"!"It, LIFE OF FACILITY ,Year of Impact 96/97 Cost;'per Unit $ 1,725 Xumber cf Units 8.0 20 GrOsa,,Cost $ 13,800 (years) ,Leas,:User Revenue - 0 't="Impact $ 13,800 + I, 600K 058 PAGL205 Vr u. Jkyy t ITS [[i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT G}, Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM rPR OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 33 ROJ,yECT NAMES COUNTY BARN ROAD ESCRIPTION: DAVIS BLVD, (SR-841 TO RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCX ROAD (4 LANING): 2.0 MILES ROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (f) (Planning District Name) jyu'tia_ RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY )]:VISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE )EPARTXENT: , TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 )ROANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 4.0 �• it � '•,�'' FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- ~ " Construction Land Construction other Total r prior; 091`=92. 330 330 Forecast•" 2 93 y 250 100 350 get Year 19 3 94* 250 250 994-95".1 3,000 200 3,200 330 500 3,000 300 4,130 h IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS is :,,Year of Impact 95/96 iti per'Unit $ 1,725 ,mber,'of Units 4.0 oss Cost $ 6,900 es User'Revenue - 0 it�Impact $ 6,900 7p eooK MS PAGE 2:J6 r� ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) n�7 i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM 'YPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT i 34 \ %OJECT NAME: ADVANCED R.O.W. ACOUISITION =CRIPTION: tROJECT LOCATION: _ NIA (Planning District Name) ta8PONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ))yX,VISIOH:, TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE )EPy,A.RTNSNT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 )RQANIZATIONt SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: - N/A �F 1 tr FINANCIAL SUMMARY_($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Construction Land Construction Other Total L991=92 s Forecast ' , 93 .` 97 200 200 zoo 200 200 200 96-97 200 200 1,300 1, 300 alA' 2,100 2,100 10N'n"*tPAcT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY rat Year of Impact N/A st,per Unit $ mbar of Units NIA Oss Cost $ (years) as^User Revenue - VImpact $ �t rM,w. scow 058 PAGE 207 'JS�w .•r•, i IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT }`}r CAPITAL Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM WE.OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 37 'ROJECT NAME: ISLES OF CAPRI ROAD (CR-9511 )ESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE BLVD, TO CR-846 (4 LANING); 3.0 MILES hd �. PROJECT LOCATION: 8 6 9 RURAL ESTATES: URBAN ESTATES (f) (Planning District Name) 4. 4 iv RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY bIVISIONt::, TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORQANI2ATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A �YS S•' � 4FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) err Pro - Construction Land Construction other Total �' prior • i1991-92~ • 386 100 , 486 Forecast ,1992,-93:' 250 50 300 Budtgyet. Year . T�9,2-94 a:T,•. 250 250 f�19c94 95,` 150 150 h5,yg9y„5r96 1996-97 -. tLlrs�i°;`" 4,800 200 5,000 G 386 650 4,800 350 6,166 �a ;.u.=IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL tip•``"or. ` LIFE OF FACILITY 1Srat Year of Impact N/A Cost' per unit $ r. "' ber:7of" Units 20 tross=Cost $- (years) Less User Revenue Net 'Impact S r{ n p n BOOK Q5H PAGc 20H f Y_t .,. aiiy r N.. r R tji} p' / t 4 �' t; • ; ,`: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM YPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # �� ROJECT NAME: AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD ESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO PINE RIDGE ROAD (6 LANING) 2.6 MILES ROJECT LOCATION: _2 CENTRAL NAPLES (�) (Planning District Name) WePONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY =SION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE 4 4h IE�(pARTHENTS TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 IRGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 5.2 .;` rtf FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) a4 Pre - Construction Land Construction Other ota Dior~ • C 991,9Z-�.,. ., •• 380 50 430 slCast: y L9A' _=93, r M '. 250 100 350 3 94 477Y: 4,000 200 4,200 tire:• t,' t31' 380 •250 4,000 350 4,980 ! p �� MPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY irst'Year of Impact 94/95 ostr-per Unit $ 1,725 ii er,of Units 5.2 20 Coss Cost $ 8,970 (years) ass User Revenue - 0 et: Impact $ 8,970 058 PAU 209 600K i CCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT <r SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT ,i _40 PROJECT NAME: SOODLETTE-FRANK ROAD F),, DESCRIPTION: 'GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO SOLANA ROAD (6 LANING): 1.7 MILES rTROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES (Planning District Name) SPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 1�ZpISMION: f- TRANSPORTATION s, Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE iP, EpART)d=: ` TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGArNIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction Land Construction other Total a Prior�� r r 991 92 300 100 400 ®cast Budget• .Year 993` 94 i • 9� 95;�;A 99.5-96 " 9'96 97 +r LL„ure�3'`, 2,650 150 2,650 300 2,650 250 3,050 ql we :' XXPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS et•'Year of Impact N/A t ` or . unit $ bar ,of Units ss'.;Cost $ s Usir Revenue - ':Impact $ 7i 058 PAGE 210 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) 9APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM 'YPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT f 41 q IROJ"ECT NAME: PINE RIDGE ROAD )ZSCRIPTIONt AIRPORT ROAD TO 1-75 (6 LANING): 2.0 MILES =JECT LOCATION: 9 URBAN ESTATES (Planning District Name) RL'SPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE V'-? �,... . �,- D;�ARTXZNTI TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 DRaANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Projects N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction Land Qonstruct-io-4 other Total M 280 50 330 20 50 70 I d9rot', o'er IM 9 4 4 1 6, 500 2,000 100 2,600 � �­r 300 500 2,000 200 3,000 , IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL 5. a; �, 'Crat LIFE OF FACILITY Year of Impact N/A Est 'per Unit umber of Units 20 , ross cost $ (years) Ise User Revenue mt'-'Impact $ BOOK AT t. 9 l [Y . �', CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM '8E OP BUBLIC FACILITY% COUNTY ROADS PROJECT * _4_2 LOJECT NAME: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD :SCRIPTION: US 41 TO GULFSHORE DRIVE (4 LANINGI: 1.4 MILES y; AOJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES () (Planning District Name) 98VONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY w y:., MS10N1 TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE ARTXENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 RGANISATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.8 w` � r ' `t5k n FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Construction Construction Other o Land O h r Total 991-92 ',' 400 50 450 brecast 50 50 nid t-Year ow•l �93-94=100 3,000 150 3,250 .994..95; 995-96 996 97 • t' 'Ota�e'r? 400 100 3,000 250 3,750 .,IXYACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY first'+ -Year of Impact 94195 ;ost',per..Unit $ 1,725 6mber `of Units 2.8 _20 cross Cost $ 4,830 (years) 'ess User Revenue - 0 Ifst,=mpact $ 4,830 r too (?58 PAGE 212 t,. �4 da,`± CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM 1PS.,OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE .y ROADS PROJECT # 44 tOJECT NAME: TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH ESCRIPTION: GRADE SEPARATION AT PINE RIDGE ROAD ROJECT LOCATION: 1 & 2 NORTH NAPLESS CENTRAL NAPLES (Planning District Name) AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY {EpyS�YONSIBLB r"SION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: N/A TRANSPORTATION 1991-95 Total Deficiency: N/A yyX�,.PARTMbNTs q, RGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A `s FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) .. Pre- Construction k4l& Construction Other Total Dior 91 92i` Forecast {r4 1A92 93. lltc'lget i,Year ,a�.,s.' 1993r94•�- ., L 94 95 95�9t6k�;' ^• 96 tUre;�j '(� ? 1,000 1,000 8,000 10,000 Mal � 1,000 1,000 8,000 10,000 ','�IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL ?a LIFE OF FACILITY rst_,Year of Impact N/A - STATE ROAD Cost`per Unit $ Number;of Units 20 Gross"Cost $ (years) Gess�User Revenue - ltet`:Impact S E BOOK 058 PAGE 213 Pc� r , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update I Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS PROJECT 1 50 PROJECT NAME: TAMTAMT TRAIL NORTH (US 411 DESCRIPTION1 TMMOKALEE ROAD TO WIGGINS PASS ROAD (6 LANING): 1.4 MILES ;PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES �►, r ..,. (�) (Planning District Name) 0RE8PONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY IVISIONi TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurements N/A DIVARyTMZNT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A WINIZATIONi SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A ,y.., . ,'Alt;'•:. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) f y' Pro - Construction Land Construction Other Total x oricast'' Budget".Year 199�,94 2,731• 2,731 994-95 ;r�" 995�a96 996j�97 ,.'• 2,731 2,731 A'IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS `�`� ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY irst.Year of Impact NZA - STATE ROAD )st.per Unit $ amber of Units 20 ross'.Cost $ (years) ass, -.user Revenue - �b'Impaat S nip ". BOOK 058 PAGL 214 411 yw-t1Y,'. r` 4s CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update a Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FOR TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: STATE ROADS PROJECT I PROJECT NAME:. SR-951 DESCRIPTION: SOUTH OF PORT -AU -PRINCE TO MARCO BRIDGE (4 1,ANTNG) (3.2 milesl PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: NIA DLPARTHENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATIONS SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY-($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - ear construction LADA Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast ,,, ,.1992-93 2,608 2,608 Budget Year 1993-94 6,269 6,269 1994-95 "i'l- 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 8,877 8,877 11 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A - STATE ROAD Cost per Unit Number of Units 20 Gross Cost (years) Less User Revenue Met Impact BOOK 0500 PAGE a rn V' CChPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 1 52 PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTON ROAD DESCRIPTION: PINE RIDGE. Roan TO GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY PROJECT LOCATION: 2 CENTRAL NAPLES (f) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY . DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE ek' DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 j% ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.5 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year construction LW& Construction Other Total k�w ' Prior �, 1991-92 r � r Forecast 1992-93 170 170 Budget Year 1993-94 200 200 1994=95 ti.. 1995-96 1,210 100 1,310 .•rr. 1996-97 Future Total 170 200 1,210 100 1,680 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 96/97 ,.�Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 2.5 20 Gross Cost $ 4,312 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 j Net Impact $ 4,312 nnip j"' DOOIf [18PAGE216 M M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 1 _53 C PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTON ROAD DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO RADIO ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: _2 CENTRAL NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) k' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Heasurement: _ LANE MILE '? dvv"y, DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 1.5 tl, FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) - -, : Pre - Year Construction Land gonstruation Other Total '4 Prior 1991-92 Forecast '. 1992-93 170 170 r. Budget Year g t'* 1993-94 500 500 1994-95 1995-96 2,518 100 2,618 �y 1996-97 Future yy1 Total 170 500 2,518 100 3,288 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 96/97 Cost per Unit $ 1,725 Number of Units 1.5 20 Gross Cost $ 2,587 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 2,587 BOOK 058 PA0t {. 1 rkv 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT V' Fourth Annual Update 4 Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT ,4 PROJECT NAME: BALD EAGLE DRIVE DESCRIPTION: NORTH 6 SOUTH OF US 41 PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO ISLAND (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 t ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior .1991-92 001 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year {a" 1993-94 1994-95 500 50 550 1995-96 .W4 ' ,;,. 1996-97 -' Future 3,000 200 3,200 Total 500 3,000 250 3,750 y, IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Yc First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ -( Number of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue - "r,e, Net Impact $ t00% 05'8 PAa 218 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT _55 C PROJECT NAME: AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD DESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO PINE RIDGE RED PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES M (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY 4f' DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENTt TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: 2.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year gonstruction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993'-94 400 50 450 u ;�.4 • 1994-95 4r 1995-96 1996-97 2,125 2,125 Future ;.pI% A.t Total 400 2,125 50 2,575 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20_ Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ BOOK VJO PAGE 219 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 56 PROJECT NAME: SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO RADIO ROAD PROJECT LOCATIONS _3 GOLDEN GATE (1) (Planning District Name) 4� RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A lj FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Lang Construction Other Total Prior + 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 . Budget Year r 1993-94 '`-1995-96 1996-97 325 325 :- Future 100 2,500 200 2,800 4 Total 425 2,500 200 3,125 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ BOOK 05'8 PAGE 220 f CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT # 37 PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTON ROAD DESCRIPTION: IMMOKALEE ROAD TO VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION A,'�f4iy DEPARTMENTt TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY_ ROADS IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE 1992-97 Total Deficiencys 277.5 Size of This Projects FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total ,t..; Prior �j 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 170 170 x' Budget Year 1993-94 jlr 1994-95 ,. 1996-97 r•,.Future 250 1,000 2,500 200 3,950 cf_ Total 420 1,.000 2,500 200 4,120 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Not Impact $ EOGK 05•SPAGE221 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM `. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS PROJECT 58 PROJECT NAME: LIVINGSTON ROAD DESCRIPTION: VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD TO PINE RIDGE ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY r ?. DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGAN22ATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- a: year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior a >'. 1991-92 170 170 • Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year ?'y ' 1993-94 1994-95 ' 1995-96 c.- 1996-97 ' Future 250 750 2,500 200 3,700 ,,k# Total 420 750 2,500 200 3,870 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS . First Year of Impact N/A Cost per unit $ Number of units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue Not Impact $ WW I, ' ` pp y BOOK M8 PAGE 222 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PR02ECTSUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COUNTY ROADS _ PROJECT f 59 PROJECT NAME: NORTH 11th STREET (IMMOKAL.EE) DESCRIPTION: ROBERTS AVENUE TO SR-29 PROJECT LOCATION: _•11 IMMOKALEE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: TRANSPORTATION Unit of Measurement: LANE MILE DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 277.5 ORGANIZATION: SECONDARY ROADS Size of This Project: .25 t FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Constructs -on Oth2r Total ^., Prior " 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 ? Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 25 25 -'...1995-96 1996-97 125 125 -�; Future �3 Total 25 125 • ISO IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue - Hot Impact $ NOTE: Funding will be from Fund 301 (?58 na 223' ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE of FACILITY 20 (years) CAPITAL• IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION PROJECT I PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND AIRPORT ROAD DESCRIPTION: EMS SUBSTATION AND VFHTC PROJECT LOCATIONS -2 CFNTAAT NADT�c (if) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: EMERGENCY ERVTCES Unit of Measurement: ALS UNIT DEPARTMENT: EMERGENCY SERVICES MEDICAL 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.6 ORGANIZATZONs Size Of This Project: 1 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land -Construction Other Total Prior F 1991-92 `. . Forecast 102 102 Sa 1992-93 10 75 179 Budget Year 264 1993-94 ;r 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 R3x2 Future �,�X•. Total 10 75 179 102 366 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL First Year of Impact 93/g LIFE OF FACILITY w Cost per Unit 4 Number of Units $ — 282.901 1 Gross Cost $ _ 282.900 Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ _ 282.900 coax 058 PAGE 225 30 (years) C r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM `• TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT f PROJECT NAME: SYSTEM STATUS FLOAT UNIT DESCRIPTION: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT LOCATION: _ TO BE DETERMINED (if) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES Unit of Measurements ALS UNIT DEPARTMENT: EMERGENCY MEDICAL 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.6 SERVICES ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project: i FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro -year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast .. 1992-93 P Budget Year {{" 1993-94 10 75 179 102 366 ..' 1994-95 1995-96 W, y'- 1996-97 Future Total 30 75 179 102 366 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ 282,900 Number of Units 1 30 Gross Cost $ 282,909 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 282,900 600K MO PAGt 226 m�* n CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: ENS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT f 304 PROJECT NAME: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT LOCATION: TO BE DETERMINED (f) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES Unit of Measurement: ALS UNIT DEPARTMENT: EMERGENCY MEDICAL 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.6 SERVICES ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project: i FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- - Year Construction Land Construction Otber Total fk Prior 1991-92 Forecast r;. 1992-93 'kk Budget Year i•' 1994-95 10 75 179 102 366 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total lO 75 179 102 366 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 95/96 Cost per Unit $ 282,900 Number of Units 1 30 Gross Cost $ 282,900 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 282,900 X. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT * 305 PROJECT NAME: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES Unit of Measurement: ALS UNIT DEPARTMENTS EMERGENCY MEDICAL 1992-97 Total Deliciencys 4.6 SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS Size of This Project: 1 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction Land Construction Other Total c, Prior 1991-92 Forecast ;;. 1992-93 4Budget Year ynn: 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 10 75 .179 102 366 1996-97 r` Future Total 10 75 179 102 366 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS , First Year of Impact 96197 Cost per Unit $ 282,900 LNumber of Units 1 Gross Cost $ 282,900 Less User Revenue - O Net Impact $ 282,900 500K 058 PAGE 228 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY _3 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT IQ¢ ` PROJECT NAME: EMS SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: EMS _SUBSTATION AND VEHICLE PROJECT LOCATION: T4 BE DETERMINED (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES Unit of Measurement: ALS UNIT ,,. DEPARTMENT: EMERGENCY MEDICAID 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.6 SERVICES ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project: 1 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction Land Construction Other Total r' ,e Prior "+ 1991-92 • t, Forecast +'ei`v' 1992-93 Budget Year 1943-94 1994-95 1996-97 10 75 179 102 366 4 r>r Future Total 10 75 179 102 366 O IITURE G IMPACT N F OPERATIN SIIDGETB ESTIMATED USEFIIL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 3 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ A„ pp 600K 058 PAGE 22J .0 t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: JAIL PROJECT f 4 PROJECT NAME: COLLIER COUNTY JAIL (PHASE I1 DESCRIPTION: 256 ADDITIONAL BEDS/ADMINISTRATION/SUPPORT FACILITIES PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: COUNTY MANAGER Unit of Measurement: BEDS DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 104 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION: Size of This Project: 256 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction Land Conatrucf36n other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 y6: Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 2,000 21,242 3,000 26,242 i . 1996-97 Future Total 2,000 21,242 3,000 26,242 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 95/96 Cost per Unit $ N/A Number of Units N/A 100 Gross Cost $ 1,600,000 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 1,600,000 dooK 05S PAGE 231 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 0 502 PROJECT NAME: COLLIER NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY ORGANIZATION: COLLIER NORTH BRANCH IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurement: SO.FT 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20.953 Size of This Project: 3,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction kgEd ronstructior Prior 1991-92 32 32 Forecast 4ti �%jy 1992-93 344 344 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 •1996-97 Future Total 32 344 376 Y,. IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 4.000 Less Usar Revenue - 1.000 Nat Impact $ 3.000 BOOK 050 PAGE 2'3 ___ 50 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM �. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 1 503 PROJECT NAME: MARCO ISLAND BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: ,6 MARCO (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: SQ.FT DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20.983 ORGANIZATION: MARCO ISLAND BRANCH Size of This Project: 3.300 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast •- 1992-93 40 40 ",st . ,. FT, Budget Year .. ,. 1993-94 409 409 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 40 409 449 `f'r* IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 5 Gross Cost $ 4,000 _ (years) Less User Revenue - 1.000 Net Impact $ 3.000 1, t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 1 505 ` PROJECT NAME: IMMOKALEE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKALEE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements SO FT DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20,987 {: ORGANIZATION: IMMOKALEE BRANCH Size of This Projects 3.000 yk. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction LAn•Q Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 2 2 Forecast 3 Budget Year -' 1993-94 30 30 1994-95 4 284 288 fir•. 1995-96 35 35 ' 1996-97 t'A { Future J� Ir Total 36 284 35 355 s�y4 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 95/96 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 33,366 Less User Revenue - 4,000 Net Impact $ 29.366 BOOK 058 PAGt 235 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 50 (years) Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM �.. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT PROJECT NAME: TMMOXAIEE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOXALEE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: SOFT •kf DEPARTMENT: LTRRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20,987 ORGAN12ATION: TMMOXALEE BRANCH Size of This Projects 3,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- Yaar Construction yQ Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 2 2 y Forecast 3, 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 30 30 Kky 1994-95 4 284 288 1995-96 35 35 1996-97 .�, • Future Total 36 284 35 355 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 95/96 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 50 Gross Cost $ 33,366 (years) Less User Revenue - 4.000 Net Impact $ 29,366 VJO PAGE 236 t00% l CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 1 506 PROJECT NAME: GOLDEN GATE BRANCH LIBRARY ADDITION DESCRIPTION: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: _3 GOLDEN GATE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: SO FT DEPARTMENTS LIBRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20,983 ORGANIZATIONS GOLDEN GATE BRANCH Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 25 25 ^_ 1991-92 17 305 [` 40 362 Forecast -1992-93 Budget Year .: 1993-94 Ft.1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 X ... .Future i+r Total 42 305 40 387 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 4,000 Less User Revenue - 1,000 Net Impact $ 3,000 sm 058 PAGE 237 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 50 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update 4 Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT 0 507• PROJECT NAME: VINEYARDS BRANCH LIBRARY DESCRIPTION: 10,000 SO, FT. BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: „9 URBAN ESTATES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: DEPARTMENT: ORGANIZATION: x1n Prior 1991-92 Forecast ( 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: SO.FT LIBRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 20.983 VINEYARDS BRANCH Size of This Project: 10.000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - construction LAn,d construction Other Total 50 50 1995-96 686 90 776 4R 1996-97 Future Total 50 686 90 826 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 96/97 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units s _ Gross Cost S 105,912 (years) Less User Revenue • - 13.250 Net Impact $ 92.662 * State Aid to Libraries 4 This project may be eliminated if negotiations with Golden Gate Estates Association regarding operation of a facility to be provided to the County are successful. b00K �lJG2 PAGi �3H CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) RECONCILIATION 07 PROJECTS TO 1992-97 DEFICIENCY DEPARTMENTS 'LIBRARY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTION SERVICE AREAS County -wide X or Planning District or Special -Area M M 1992-97 DEFICIENCY: 97,859 BOOKS (quantity) (unit of measurement) 550 Proiect Name Library Book Collection b00% 058 PKt 239 Size of TI" Cumulative Protect Total 97,859 97,859 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update 4 Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LIBRARY BOOK STOCK PROJECT /Q PROJECT NAME: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTION DESCRIPTION: BUDGET FOR LIBRARY BOOKS PROJECT LOCATION: COUNTY -WIDE (0) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: BOOKS DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 97,859 ORGANIZATION: HO AND ADMIN. Size of This Projects 97,859 year I( Prior 1991-92 :... • Forecast y 1992-93 yi Budget Year 1993-94 •lri�gr-: • 4. 1994-95 w. 1995-96 `1996-97 Future Total FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction Other Total IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS 4 First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue Not Impact $ 500K 058 PAGE 24U 313 313 269 269 929 929 986 986 1,045 1,045 3,147 3,147 6,689 6,689 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY VARIES (years) r. n CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PROJECT / §Q1 PROJECT NAME: HEALTH AND SFRVTf FS Rf1TT.n TM _ DESCRIPTION: 75.000 SO, FT, HEALTH AND PUBLIC SERVTCES FACILITY PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAP.FS (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISIONS COUNTY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ORGANIZATION: IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurements SO.FT 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 60.912 Size of This Projects _ N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Q Construction Other Total Prior 282 13 8,418' 677 9,390 xY 1991-92 Forecast 66 596 662 1992-93 '! .:.. ' Budget Year .w 1993-94 1994-95 ',. �1995-96 1;:: 1996-97 Future Total 348 13 9,014 677 10,052 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL First Year of Impact 90/91 LIFE OF FACILITY Cost per Unit $ 2.43 Number of Units 75.000 5_ Gross Cost $ 182,250 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ _ 182,250 sea% 058 PAGE 242 Y a: 9APITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: GOVERNMENT_ BUILDINGS PROJECT i = PROJECT NAME: AGRICULTURE CENTER DESCRIPTION: NEW STRUCTURE TO HOUSE AGRICULTURE ACTIVITIES PROJECT LOCATION: _11 IMMOKALEE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISION: COUNTY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: QFFICE OF CAPITAL EROJECTS MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION: ADMIN. IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurement: S .FT 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 60.912 Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Total Prior 98 890 991 1991-92 10 221 231 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 2994-95 1995-96 4 1996-97 Future Total 108 1,111 3 1,222 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 91/92 Cost per Unit $ 2.43 Number of Units 12.000 so Gross Cost $ 29.160 (years) Less User Revenue - Q Net Impact $ 29.160 ' dooK a58 PADS 243 FARES AND RECREATION CAPITAL FACILITIES VALUE OF FACILITIES PLANNED 1Y TILE CIE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: $122.00 PER CAPITA CAPITAL POPULATION FACILITIES FACILITIES CAPITAL VALUE FISCAL CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED FACILITIES SURPLUS PER YEAR PERMANENT AT 5122/CAPITA IN CIE AVAIWLE (DEFICIENCY) CAPITA tq A 1 '—i�MrM —�b0�6dd --W.Wr 5 —3i.37i �1Z5 O 91-92 91.92 167 48a 20.433 536 3.513,000 23.1" 073 2.730.539 S133 Z 92-93 179,263 21,870.056 7.341.000 30,505,075 8.634.969 $170 rna 93-94 191.033 23.306.636 3,870.000 39.375,075 16.06a,439 S206 [� 94-95 202,a13 24,743.186 4.405.000 43.780,075 19,036,aa9 5216 ►+ 95-96 211,800 26.205,600 I,z6A.0oo 45.044.075 la,a38.475 1210 y 96-91 227.000 27.694000 0 45.0" 073 17,3$0,075 $193 97-98 239.200 29,182.400 0 45.044.07515.861,675 Staa O 98-99 251,400 30,670.800 0 45.044.075 14.373.275 S179 Z 9q-oo 263,600 3zls9,zoo o csu,ou,o7s u.eeA,a7s sln' 00-01 276.500 33:733.000 0 45:O075 11.311.075 S163 O 01-02 290,101 35.392.322 0 <5,04A.075 9.631.753 S155 ^) o 'O o FACILITIES FACILITIES AVAILABLE A O POPULATION REQUIRED PLANNED FACILITIES VALUE 4 © TIME PERIOD (CO -WIDE PERM) AT 2122 IN CIE AVAILABLE PER CAPITA � A W PRESENT TO 167,48a 20.433,536 3.513,000 23.1".075 138 ci 9/30/92 -' H ^ S YEAR OROYTN 59,512 7,260,4b1 21,880.000 21.SaO.009 O 10/1/92-9/30/97 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 227.000 27.694.000 25.393.000 45.044.075 l9e N 10/1192-9/30/97 I 2ND 5-YR OROYTN 63.101 7,69a,322 0 0 r `D 10/1/97-9/30/02 i v 10 YEAR TOTAL 290.101 35,392.322 21,100,000 45,0L4,079 155 p 10/1/92-9/30/02 m 'o N () M to z n K PARKS AND RECIREATTONS [09RRIITY ►ARKS ACRES LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 1.2882/1000 POP - POPULATION CORM PK ACRES C" PK ACRES CORM PK ACRES SURPLUS/ REQUIRED CI► TOTAL AVAILABLE SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) FISCAL CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) SCO SAT PLANNED VALUE � TEAM PERNAMERT 0.0012882 IN CIP -- ............................. A ................................ ....................... ............................ ........................... 0 6,"&.250 t,St6,288 O 90-91 91-92 156.850 167,488 202.1 0 253.0 215.9 32• 290.0 55.9 74.2 5,481,963 5.853,575 868.000 0 7,866.250 7,866,250 2.012.675 1+603.088 Z n 92-93 179.263 230.9 0 290.0 246.1 0 290.0 59.1 43.9 6.263.161 6,675.463 0 7,866,250 1,190.788 t- 93-94 94-95 191.039 202.813 261.3 0 290.0 28.7 7.081.763 0 0 7,866.250 7.866,250 778,488 360,763 N H 95-% 9-97 214.800 22T,OU)0 276.7 0 290.0 292.4 32•• 322.0 13.3 29.6 7.505,488 7,931,350 868,000 0 8,734,250 8, 734,250 802,900 377,038 97-98 %-94 23SO 200 251,400 308,1 0 322.0 323.9 0 322.0 13.9 t1.9) 8,357.213 8,785,788 0 8.734.250 (51,538) (477.400) 0 p Z 99-00 263.600 334,E 0 322.0 0 322.0 i17.b) (34.2) 9.211.650 9,661,925 0 0 8,T34,250 8.734.250 (927,675) 00-01 01-02 276.500 290.101 356.2 373.7 0 322.0 (51.71 10.136.613 0 8.T34.250 (1,402,363) •Q 'a POPULATION COIM PK ACRES COMM PC ACRES CdM PK ACRES SURPLUS/ o. CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) 4 o TIME ►ER100 PERK&MENT........4 CIP ........2 1M ... n PRESENT TO 167,498 216 32 290 74 H 9/30/92 q S TEAR a-Mv 59,St2 TT 32 32 p 10/l/92-9/30/97 r � N 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL 227.000 292 6< 322 30 �D 1011/92-9/30/97 N 2M0 5-TR GRWTN 63.101 81 0 0 r 10/1/97-9/30/02 %O �0 10 YEAR TOTAL 290.101 174 32 322 ;!(52) 10/l/92-9/30/02 R p •Ld Acquisition an For Coma pity Park rib - Location: South Maples m ••Land Acquisition For Coaaaafity Park N - Location. Ta Bs Determined n N m z . A rK PAMM AN RECREATION: REGIONAL PARK ACRES LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 2.9412/1000 POP. POPULATION REG PARK ACRES REG PARK ACRES RED PARK ACRES SURPLUS/ REQUIRED CI► TOTAL AVAIII.1 SURPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) t: FISCAL CO -WIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) i COST AT 510,000 PLANNED COST VALUE YEAR .......................................... PERMANENT 0.0029412 1N CI► ........................................................ .•_.........._. ................ - '-' .................... 20.9A.800 n 16.261.000 O 90-91 156.350 "M tbt9 2,087.4 1.626.1 4.613.000 m.m.000 0 20,874.000 1S,9Ab,000 n 91-92 92-97 167,488 492.6 0 2,087.E 179,263 527.2 0 2,087.A 1.59L.3 1.560.2 4.926.000 5.272.000 0 20,874,0D0 15,602,000 2 15,255.000 93-94 9l•95 191.038 561.9 0 2.08T.4 202,813 596.5 0 2,087.4 1,S25.S 1.490.9 S,6t9,000 5,96S,00o 0 0 20,874,000 20.a7c,DDO t+ 14.909.000 ►� S 95•96 21A,800 631.3 0 2,087.1 1,t55.6 6.318,000 0 0 20,974 000 20,87i.0D0 1�,556,000 tA,197,000 H %-97 97-98 227.000 667.7 0 2,087.A 239.200 701.5 0 2.087.t 1,t19.7 1,783.9 6,677.000 7,03S,000 0 20,$74 000 13:839.000 N 13,4w 000 Z 9a-99 251,A00 739.4 0 2,087.4 1.348.0 7.394.000 0 0 20:874:000 20,$74,000 13:121:000 99-DO 00-0/ 263,600 775.3 0 2,057.i 276.500 813.2 0 2,087.A 1,312.1 1,27c.2 7,7i3.000 8,i32,000 0 20,97A,000 12,7t2,000 O 12.342.000 ^si 01-02 290.101 8S3.2 0 2:067.4 I.M.2 8,532.000 0 20.SA.000 a A a. o POPULATION REG PARK ACRES AEG PARK ACRES REG PARK ACRES SURPLUS/ O CO -VIDE REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILASLE (DEFICIENCY) W TIME PERIOD ►ERMAMENT 0.0 in CIP n -------:---- ----------------------................ ------------ H 0 PRESENT TO 187 t88 493 0 2,087 1,595 W MGM _. HO S YEAR GROWN 59.512 175 0 0 1011192.9130197 n0 S YEAR SUITOTAL 227.000 668 0 2.087 1.420 to '1 vi 1011/92.9/30/97 2ND S-YR CROWTN 63.101 186 0 0 to 10/1/97-9/30/02 nD v 10 YEAR TOTAL 290,101 853 0 2,087 1.23i 10/l/92.9/30/02 m M n ,NOTE: ~ 17 Addition -of-1483 acres of lard from Collier-Sesinote State Park. This 2 n screage includes only useabte acres. Total park acreage is 6243 acres, K The trlance of the acreage (4760 acres) is wilderness preserve and aostty mangrove. Also, the addition of 166 acres at Delnor•Yiggiro State Park Is included In this inventory. 1 1 1� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BICYCLE TRAILS PROJECT 1 701 PROJECT NAME: BICYCLE TRAILS DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT PATHS TO SCHOOLS & PARKS WHERE APPROPRIATE CONNECT BIKE TRAILS: (Funded in Roads Construction Budget) PROJECT LOCATION: _ COUNTY -WIDE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENTS PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.529.925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION size of This Project: 150,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- XJAX Construction LB= Construction Other Total Prior • - 1991-92 75 75 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future 75 75 75 75 kly' t;kyY , Total 225 225 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Net Impact $ WK 058 pia 247 PI. • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY PARK 16 FACILITIES DESCRIPTION: BALLFIELDS. COURTS, LANDSCAPE, RESTROOMS. PLAY AREAS AND PARKING LOTS PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENTS PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529.925 ORGANIZATIONS ADMINISTRATION Siae of This Projects 3.024.000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Construction ydinQ Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 868 868 Forecast 1992-93 1,524 1,524 Budget Year „ s 1993-94 1,500 1,500 1994-95 1995-96 i 1996-97 Future .. Total 868 3,024 3,892 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 131,600 (years) Less User Revenue - 12,000 Not Impact $ 119,600 a: 600K 058 PALE 48' �Ae• . i1'j CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PHASE II PROJECT PROJECT NAME: PHASE II FACILITIES INCLUDING BASEBALL FIELDS. BASKET- BALL COURTS, CHILDRENS PLAYGROUNDS SHUFFLEBOARD COURTS RACQUETBALL. PICNIC PAVILIONS. SOCCER FIELDS. ETC, PROJECT LOCATION: 11, 1. 6. 4. & 3 IMMOKALEE. NORTH NAPLES, MARCO. EAST NAPLES, GOLDEN GATE (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects NIA FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Sonst uctip Other Total Prior 32 1,906 1,938 1991-92 106 1,992 SO 2,178 V.', Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 4" , 1993-94 £: 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 a Future Total 138 3,898 s0 4,116 5 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 90/91 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 301,300 (years) Less User Revenue - 0 Net Impact $ 301,200 •„• nn pp 600K 05's PAGE 249 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PROJECT * 2DA PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL DESCRIPTION: 25 METER POOL, CHANGING ROOMS. KIDDY POOL PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKALEE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $/Facilities/ Capita. DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Project: 1,500,000 r FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro- Year Construction Ling Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast Ile+,: 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 50 1,450 1,500 1994-95 1995-96 y; 1996-97 i{ Future 3 Total 50 1,450 1,500 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 351,500 (years) Less User Revenue - _ 60,000 Net Impact $ 291,500 BOOK O'%PAGLzoo CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM RECREATION CENTER PROJECT I C TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: J PROJECT NAME: RECREATION CENTER DESCRIPTION: BASKETBALL AEROBICS. RESTROOMS COURT, CLASS ROOMS, LOCKER ROOMS, STATE PROJECT LOCATION: 4 EAST NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: S/Fa iilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.529.925 ORGANIZATION: ADMIN. Size of This Project: 2.800.000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre- -- ear Construction Land construction Other Total Prior / 1991-92 200 200 Forecast 1992-93 1,300 1,300 Budget Year 1993-94 1,500 1,500 1994-95 ,. 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 3,000 3,000 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 2_ Gross Cost $ 94.900 (years) Less User Revenue - 4.500 Net Impact $ 90.400 BOOK 058 FAu 251 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMPETITIVE SWIMMING POOL PROJECT 1 708 PROJECT NAME: COMPETITIVE SWIMMING POOL DESCRIPTION: 25 METER POOL, DECK, DIVING AREA, LOCKER ROOM, GRANDSTANDS, RESTROOMS, PLAY AREAS PROJECT LOCATION: 3 GOLDEN GATE (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements $/Facilities/ ' Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.529.925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year +k . ..;.1993-94 ' 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 A 5" .4" Future -�' Total ,'- IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 92/93 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 351,500 Less User Revenue - 60,000 Net Impact $ 291,500 BOOK 05.8 PAGE 252 16 1,384 100 1,500 16 1,384 100 1,500 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY (years) 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: BOAT RAMPS PROJECT 12U ( PROJECT NAMES BOAT LANES DESCRIPTIONS BOAT LANES, PARKING. FISH CLEANING TABLE. RESTROOMS, PICNIC AREA, LANDSCAPING. TOT LOT PROJECT LOCATIONS VARIOUS (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISIONS PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: ,SFacilities/ CaRita DEPARTMENTS PARKS b RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMIN. size of This Project: 2,389,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction LAnfl Construction other Total Prior v: 1991-92 513 513 �:-;. • Forecast 4•', 1992-93 1,000 1,389 2,389 Budget Year 1993-94 µ. 1994-95 V , 4,;. 1995-96 1996-97 LLr' Future Total 1,000 1,902 2,902 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Not Impact $ dou 058 PAGE 253 L4 SRC; A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM CTYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT I zu PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY PARK 07 DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY PARK WITH BALLFIELDS. TOT LOTS, COURTS, LANDSCAPING. FOOTBALL/SOCCER FIELDS. RACQUETBALL COURTS_ PROJECT LOCATION: 9 URBAN ESTATES (f) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects 4,368,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Con truction LAnA Construction other Total Prior ' 1991-92 p Forecast 1992-93 868 868 ;rJ S Budget Year 1903-94 1,331 1,331 N, 1994-95 2,169 2,169 `x 1995-96 1996-97 $ 4;: Future -Total 4,368 4,368 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 95/96 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 131,600 (years) Less User Revenue - 12,000 Net Impact $ 119,600 toot 1158 PAGE 254 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual update a Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT ,� \ PROJECT NAME: COMMUNITY PARK IS DESCRIPTION: TNCLUDES BALL•FIELDS. COURTS, LANDSCAPING, REST ROOMS PROJECT LOCATION: _S RURAL ESTATES (0) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES unit of Measurement: $/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.529.925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects 3,500,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other Total Prior C 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year y. i. .1993-94 1994-95 2,236 2,236 =.. 1995-96 1,264 1,264 1996-97 a.. o: Future Total 3,500 3,500 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 96/97 Cost per Unit $ Number of units 20 Gross Cost $ 131,600 (years) Less User Revenue - 12,000 Net Impact $ 119,600 BOOK 0' PAGE 255 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: REGIONAL PARKS FACILITIES PROJECT I JJU PROJECT NAME: BAREFOOT BEACH PARKING LOT AND NATURE TRAIL DESCRIPTION: BAREFOOT BEACH PARKING LOT AND NATURE TRAIL PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PLIBT.TC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: $/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION_ 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction LQ Construction Other Total Prior _ 4.::• 1991-92 34 166 200 uF. Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year _1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 s. Future ,fi,r Total 34 166 200 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 20 (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ W BOOK M8 PAGE 256 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COMMUNITY PARKS PROJECT f 21A PROJECT NAME: 9th COMMUNITY PARK PHASES I AND II DESCRIPTION: LAND AND FACILITIES PROJECT LOCATION: TO BE DETERMINED (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements Aces/Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 2.4 ORGANIZATIONS ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects 32 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - year Construction jgnQ Construction Other Total :rr Prior _ 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 -k," Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 200 868 1,068 Future 3,300 3,300 Total 200 868 3,300 4,368 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Future Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Not Impact $ boa% 058PAGE257 A 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT } Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: VANDERBILT BEACH PHASE III PROJECT PROJECT NAME: BATH HOUSE DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 1 BATH HOUSE AT VANDERBILT BEACH PROJECT LOCATION: I NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENTS PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATIONS ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects 150,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction LAU Construction Other Total Prior 19,91-92 Forecast 1992-93 20 120 10 150 Budget Year 1993-94 k 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 20 120 10 150 ". IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units �0 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Not Impact $ 500K VJO PAGE 258 °xS. i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT I ZlSt PROJECT NAME: REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX DESCRIPTION: BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL FIELDS, SOCCER AND FOOTBALL PROJECT LOCATION: TO B, DETERMINED (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENTS PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4.529.925 ORGANIZATIONS ADMINISTRATION Size of This Projects 3,036,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY (8 IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction L4 Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 C Forecast 1992-93 322 322 Budget Year 'tY 1 ' 1993-94 2,714 2,714 1994-95 1995-96 '. 1996-97 Future Total 322 2,714 3,036 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 250,000 (years) Less User Revenue - 36,000 Net Impact $ 214,000 ton 058 PAGE 259 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM `• TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TIGERTAIL BEACH PROJECT 1 717 PROJECT NAME: TTII 'zERTAIL BEACH DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 120 PARKING SPACES PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO ISLAND (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements S/Facilities/ Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS i RECREATIO 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 v. ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Project: 293,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction LI14 Construction Other Total Prior " 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 50 243 293 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 50 243 293 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 93194 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost $ 0 (years) Less User Revenue - 18,000 Net Impact $ (18,000) BOOK 0.50 FAGE 260 `;J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update a Amendment (1992) PROJECT BUXMARX FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: COLLIER COUNTY RACOUET CLUB PROJECT PROJECT NAME: COLLIER COUNTY RhCOUET CLUB DESCRIPTIONS CONSTRUCT TENNIS AND RACOUETBALL COURTS PROJECT LOCATION: 6 MARCO ISLAND (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurements $/Facilities/ Canita DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiencys 4,529,925 ORGAX12ATIONt ADMINISTRATION Sixe of This Projeot: 250,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year constructions Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 3.993-94 50 200 250 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total so 200 250 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE 07 FACILITY First Year of Impact NIA Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost (years) Loss User Revenue Not Impact eooK 058 pm 261 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FOR TYPE Or PUBLIC FACILITY: CLAM PASS PARK PROJECT I PROJECT NAME: CLAM PASS PARK DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT BEACH FACILITIES PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: PUBLIC SERVICES Unit of Measurement: S/Facilitiesl Capita DEPARTMENT: PARKS 6 RECREATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 4,529,925 ORGANIZATION: ADMINISTRATION Size of This Project: 420,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction LAAA Construction_ other Total Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 420 420 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 420 420 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL Lirz OF FACILITY First Year of Impact NIA Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 20 Gross Cost (years) Less User Revenue Net Impact 1009 0500 PAGE 262 w POTABLE MITER sYSTEN • • LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: IM/OPD/CAPITA PLUS 212 CON -RESIDENTIAL POPULATION IIW no no SURPLUS/ FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) VALUE OR (CAST) AT TEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000245 IN CI► .......................................................................................... S2,497,6t6 t9 90-91 73,300 13.0 4.3 16.3 - .({,2L5,996) A 91-92 78.755 19.3 13.2 29.5 92-93 84.211 20.6 0.7) 10.2 25,475.909 O z (2.5) 27.0 22.0 1.5 28.5 6.4 6.5 1S,90L.93{ l) -� 95 16� 23.3 4.0 32.5 95.96 100.577 24.6 9.2 16.23{.699 22,979 343 r 0 32.5 96-97 106,06 26.1 0 32.5 97-98 112.336 7.9 6.4 19.731 {03 15.90{,93L p y 27.5 0 32.5 98-99 118,215 29.0 0 32.5 5.0 3.5 12.488,230 8,741.761 a.2LS.OS7 O 99-00 124.095 30.E 0 32.5 00-01 129,97E 2.1 Z 01-02 136,S2a 31.3 0 32.5 0.7 t0.9) 1,7L8.3S2 (2,2{7,881) O 0 a o POPULATION NO No No SURPLUS/ COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 245/CAPITA VALUE OR (COST) AT M a7 IN CII ............... ............................. S2,L97,6L6 O .............. .............. 4 PRESENT TO 73.755 19.3 13.2 29.5 9/30192 10.2 25.L7S,909 tN y N S TEM.-OWN 27.701 6.3 3.0 3.0 y 10/l/92-9/30/97 O 5-YEAR SUSTOTAL 106,456 26.1 16.2 32.5 10/1/92-9130197 6.4 15,98{,93t b. %0 kO 2ND 5-11 OWN 30.072 7.3 0.0 0.0 N 10/l/97-9/30/02 1 10 YEAR TOTAL 136,520 33.4 3.0 32.3 10/1/92.9/30/02 (0.9) (2,2{7,D81) �D v *DEFINITION C7 m roragent plus awilable thirty(30) day potable water store" plus aquifer M storage and recovery system. d recovery sys n N A ttmporary permit was obtained from the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation m 2 to increase the water plant trestmOnt capacity by LMCO for a period of two (2) years, A T1ws, in fY92-93. a loss of available NGO$ appears due to the expiration of the '4 temporary permit. 1 1 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM �. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT 0 859 PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION DESCRIPTION: ADD 4 MGD CAPACITY PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (0) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION ORGANIZATION: WATER Prior arx t }h IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY Unit of Measurements MGD 1992-97 Total Deficiency: f3.41 Size of This Projects 4.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - ill 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 800 800 Budget Year 1993-94 4,000 4,000 +. 1994-95 r ` 1995-96 "e 1996-97 Future Total 800 4,000 4,800 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL ,. LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 94/95 Cost per unit $ 90.000 f Number of units 4 _20 `- dross Cost $ 360,000 (years) Less user Revenue 360,000 Net Impact $ eecx 058 PAGE 264 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECT PROJECT NAME: AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY DESCRIPTION: AQUIFER STORAGE OF UP TO 4 MGD FOR PEAK SEASON, AS POSSIBLE - NORTH COUNTY )jATER TREATMENT PLANT, EXISTING WATER TREATMENT PLANT, AND/OR MANATEE ROAD PROJECT LOCATION: (fl (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: MGD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: (3.4) ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Projects 3.0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction Land construction Other Total Prior 250 850 1,100 1991-92 Forecast .1992-93 100 300 400 .; Budget Year A1993-94 100 300 400 1994-95 • 1995-96 1996-97 Future '�, Total 450 1,450 1,900 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY ' First Year of Impact N/A Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 2_0 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue Net Impact $- '' BOOK 058 PAGE 265 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM C• TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT # 861 PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN. US 41 SOUTH - RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD TO CR-951 DESCRIPTION: 31,600 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (X) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY (S IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction sand Construction Other Total Prior . 1991-92 300 300 Forecast 1992-93 1,580 1,580• Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 uture Total 300 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS . First Year of Impact 92/93 Cost per Unit $ .493 Number of Units 31,600 Gross Cost $ 15,580 Less User Revenue - 15,580 Net Impact $ 0 aou 05.8 pAu 266 41 1,580 1,880 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) t: y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT ,i 6 \ PROJECT NAME: US 41 SOUTH, 16" WATER MAIN - EAST FROM CR-951 ON US 41 SOUTH DESCRIPTION: 15,000 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Project: N/A Year Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction 150 150 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ .493 Number of Units 15,000 Gross Cost $ 7,395 Less User Revenue - 7,395 Net Impact $ 0 750 750 a4aK 058 PAGE M Other Total 150 iE 750 900 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) "r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT r Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM \. TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM_ PROJECT 864 PROJECT NAME: 16" WATER MAIN, PINE RIDGE ROAD, PHASE 5 - VINEYARDS TO CR-951 DESCRIPTION: 15,000 L.F. OF 16" WATER MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY ?` DIVISIONS UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A )" DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WATER Size of This Project: N/A ta. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction Land Construction other Totalis Prior 1991-92 120 120 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1,000 1,000 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 120 1,000 1,120 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ .493 Number of Units 15,000 20 Gross Cost $ 7,395 (years) Less User Revenue - 7,395 Net Impact $ 0; BOOK WS PAGE 268 0 CA 00 SEVER TREATMENT PLANT: SOUTH COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 100/GPO/CAPITA PLUS 21X NON-RESIDENTIAL POPULATION MCD MCA MGD SURPLUS/ VALUE OR FISCAL COUNTY REWIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT 52.840,143 YEAR SERVICE AREA 0.000121 IN CIP ............... ............... ............... ............... 90-91 ............•.. 63,318 ............... 7.7 ............... 4.7 • 8.0 0.3 852,043 91-92 6a,031 8.2 0 8.0 (0.2) (568.029) 92-93 72,741 8.8 0 8-0 (0-8) (2,2T2,114) 93-94 77,456 9.1. 8.0 •• 16.0 6.6 6.1 18. 744, 944 17,324,572 94-95 82,169 9.9 10.5 0 0 I6.0 16.0 5.5 15,620,737 95-96 96-97 86,881 91,960 11.1 0 16.0 4.9 13,916,701 97-98 97,039 11.7 0 16.0 4.3 12.212,615 98-99 102,118 12.4 0 16.0 3.6 3.0 10,224,515 5,520,429 99-00 00-01 107,197 112,275 13.0 13.6 0 0 16.0 16.0 2.4 6.816.343 01-02 117,937 14.3 0 16.0 1.7 4,828,243 POPULATION MGO MGD MGD SURPLUS/ VALVE OR COUNTY REWIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COS]) AT 52,840,143 TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA IN CIP PRESENT TO 68,031 6.2 0.0 8.0 (0.2) (568.029) 9/30/92 5 YEAa*GROYTH 23,929 2.9 8.0 8.0 10/1/92-9/30/97 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 91,960 11.1 8.0 16.0 4.9 13,916.701 10/l/92-9/30/97 2ND 5-YR GROWTH 25,977 3.2 0.0 0.0 10/1197.9130102 10 YEAR TOTAL 117,937 14.3 a.0 1,6.0 1.7 4,828.243 10/l/92.9/30/92 1 • CIE Project No. 904 - 4.7 MGD Plant Construction •• CIE Project No. 916 - 8.0 MGD Expansion IN F 1 SE1✓ER TREATMENT PLANT: NORTH COUNTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: IDO/GPD/CAPITA PLUS 21.1% NON-RESIDENTIAL POPUI-AT ION MGD MGD AGO SURPLUS/ VALUE OR �D FISCAL COUNTY REQUIRED PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT rn S2,840,143 - YEAR SERVICE AREA ............... ............... 0.000121 IN CIP ............... - ............... .............. n ............... O ............... 90-91 37,212 4.5 2.0 • 0 4.5 4.5 1 (0.3) 0 Z (852,D43) 0 91-92 92.93 39,982 42,751 4.8 5.2 3.0 •• 7.5 2.3 6,532,329 93-94 45,521 5.5 0 7.5 2.3 5,680,286 94-95 48,290 5.8 0 7.5 1.7 4,823,243 y 95-96 51,060 6.2 0 7.5 1.3 3,692.186 .3 96-97 54,045 6.5 0 7.5 1.) 2,340,143 ,-, 97-98 57,029 6.9 0 7.5 0.1 1,704,036 O 98.99 60.014 7.3 0 7.5 0.2 568,029 Z 99-00 62.999 7.6 0 7.5 (0.1) (284,014) O 00.01 65,984 8.0 0 7.5 (0.5) (1,420,072) 01-02 69,311 8.4 0 7.5 (0.T) (2,556,129) POPULATION MC" "Go MGD SURPLUS/ v VALUE OR ;D COUNTY REWIRE. PLANNED AVAILABLE (DEFICIENCY) (COST) AT O TIME PERIOD SERVICE AREA 121/CAPITA IN CIP ----- ....... $2.540.11.3 C+ ............... rn ............... ............... ............... ............... C) PRESENT TO 39.982 4.3 0.0 4.5 (0.3) (852,D43) (n 9/30/92 q O 5 YEAR GROWN 14,063 1.7 3.0 3.0 r 10/l/92-9/30/97 tD 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 54,D45 6.5 3.0 7.5 1.3 2.840,143 N 10/l/92-9/30/97 1 r 2ND 5-YR GROWTH 15.266 1.9 0.0 0.0 '0 10/l/97-9/30/02 • J 10 YEAR TOTAL 69.311 8.4 3.0 ' 7.5 (0.1) (2,556.129) 10/1192-9/30/02 rn • CIE Project Vo. 901 2.0 AGO Expansion H •` CIE Project No. 917 - 3.0 AGO Expansion (� H rn z n •c 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM r TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT * 909 l \ PROJECT NAME: 12" FORCE MAIN - PUMP STATION 12.19 TO PUMP STATION #3 20 i DESCRIPTION: 11.300 L.F. OF FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (�) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY, DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Totalrb, Prior` 1991-92 220 220 C Forecast 1992-93 1,100 1,100 Budget Year 1993-94 ,L, f: 1994-95 1995-96 ' 1996-97 Future Total 220 1,100 1,320 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 92/93 Cost per Unit $ 1.68 per L.F. Number of Units 11.300 Gross Cost $ 18.984 Less User Revenue - 18.984 Net Impact $ 000K 058 PAGE 271 l ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT * 916 PROJECT NAME: SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION (8 MGD1 DESCRIPTION: WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION FROM 8MGD TO 16MGO PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: MGD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 3.1 ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: 8.0 Year Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction Other 1,800 1,800 9,000 COMPLETE IN 93/94 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 11,025 Less User Revenue - 11,025 _ Net Impact $ WK 058 PAGE 272 9,000 Total 1,800 9,000 10,800 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT 9117 C ; PROJECT NAME: NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY s; EXPANSION (3 MGD) AND CONVERSION DESCRIPTION: DESIGN SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION (COSTS FROM 201 FACILITIES PLAN) P„ PROJECT LOCATION: 1 NORTH NAPLES (Y) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY] DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: MGD DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 2.0 ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: 3.0 Year Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction Ot er 500 500 3,600 2,500 6,100 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ 11,025 Less User Revenue - 11,025 Net Impact BOOK 058 PAGE 273' Total 500 3,600 2,500 6,600 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELE14ENT Fourth Annual Update A Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMP STATION PROJECT 919 PROJECT NAME: RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD - PUMP STATION #3.20 t. DESCRIPTION: MASTER PUMP STATION PROJECT LOCATION: 5 SOUTH NAPLES (#) (Planning District Name)'' r `a RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A t DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: N/A 4 N 2y FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 100 100 \, 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 700 700 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 i 1996-97 Future Total 100 700 800 `c IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL r LIFE OF FACILITY`, First Year of Impact 92/93u- Cost per Unit $ 7,721 #; Number of Units 1 20 Gross Cost $ 7,721 (years) Less User Revenue - _ 7,721 Net Impact $ 600K 058 PAGE 274 ChPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update 4 Amendment (1992) RROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: PUMA, STATION PROJECT # 929 PROJECT NAME: PUMP STATION#3.17 DESCRIPTION: US 41 SOUTH PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAXAPALM CREEK (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N!A DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Site of This Project: N/A Year Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction 100 100 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact 93194 Cost per Unit $ 7,721 Number of Units 1 Gross Cost $ 7,721 Less User Revenue - 7,721 Net Impact $ 0 700 700 wx 058 PA,,1 275 Other Total 100 700 800 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 20 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SEWER TRANSMISSION FACILITY PROJECT ,Y 931 PROJECT NAME: 12"/16" FORCE MAIN, IMMOKALEE ROAD EAST - OUAIL CREEK TO CR-951 a DESCRIPTION: 15,000 L.F. OF 12"/16" FORCE MAIN PROJECT LOCATION: 8 RURAL ESTATES (//) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: UTILITIES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATION 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: WASTEWATER Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 100 100 Forecast 1992-93 1,000 1,000 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 100 1,000 1,100 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact 93/94 Cost per Unit $ 1.68 Per L.F. Number of Units 15,000 20 Gross Cost $ 25,200 (years) Less User Revenue - 25,200 Net Impact $ 0 BOOK 058 PAGE 277 SOLID WkSTE ' LEVEL Of SERVICE STANDARD: 1.39 TOMS/CAPITA TEN TEARS Of RAW LAIR): ACRES (N-PI" end Imwkgi") POPULATION POPULATION ACRES RAW LAND RAW LAND ACRES SSNRPLUS/ (DEFICIENCY) VALUE/ AVERAGE COST AT FISCAL CO -WIDE TEN YEAR REQUIRED ACRES ACRES PLANNED LAND) 510,000 YEAR WEIGHTED AVG. TOTAL ANNUALLY AVAILABLE REQUIRED IN CIP (10-YEARS •...... ....... ............... 90-91 ........................ 177,171 2,350.331 23.2 327.1 307.4 SO ..... 69.7 129.3 697,082 1,292,885 91.92 188,897 2,482,211 24.7 353.9 324.6 100 136.9 1,369,081 92-93 201,876 2,617,356 26.4 429.2 342.3 50 212.6 2,125,669 93.91. 214,855 2,754,515 28.1 452.8 360.3 1:0 266.3 2,662,644 94-95 227,834 2,-1, 691 29-8 544.7 378.5 100 215.0 2, 180,019 95.06 241,046 3,o14,B74 31.5 614.9 396.9 0 0 167.7 1,576,836 96-97 254,493 3,178,564 33.3 583.4 415.7 0 115.2 1,152,123 97-98 267,940 3,325,269 35.0 550.1 434.9 60.6 605,874 98.99 281,396 3,474,993 35.E 515.1 454.5 0 3.8 38,DB7 99.00 294,833 3.627,739 38.6 475.3 474.5 0 (55.1) •i51,2iD) DO-01 309,051 3,782,508 40.4 439.7 -'N.,B 0 01-U2 324,042 3.925,059 42.4 399.3 513.3 0 02-03 339,035 03-04 354.031. 04-05 169.017 05-06 384.736 06-07 401.193 07-08 07,664 08-D9 434,132 09-10 450,602 09-10 450,602 POPULATION POPULATION ACRES RAW LAID CAW LAND ACRES SURPLUS (DEFICIENCY) VALUE/ AVERAGE COST AT CO -WIDE TEN YEAR REQUIRED ACRES .ACRES PLANNED CIP (10 YEA1R5 -AND) TIME PEP.,J VEIGHIED AVG. ............... TOTAL ............... ANNUALLY ............... AVAILABLE ............... PEOUIRED •------------- --------------- IN --•--•--------' ........ .. .....0 PR,SENT TO 188,897 2,482,211 24.7 353.9 ;24.6 100 129.3 1,292,885 9/30/92 5 YEAR GROWTH 65,596 696,353 8.6 229.5 1 91.1 270 10/l/92-9/30/97 5-TEAR SUBTOTAL 254.493 3,178,564 33.3 583.4 415.7 370 537.7 5,376,836 10/1/92.9/30/97 2ND 5-YR GROWTH 69,549 746,495 9.1 (184.1) 97.6 0 10/l/97-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 324,042 3,925,059 42.4 399.3 513.3 270 155.9 1.559.433 10/l/92-9/30/02 m n O z C) r a •-3 O z C O C-� m n .3 En •3 O N to 1D J m 7 H n H rn z �-C 1 1 SOLID WASTE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD: 1.39 TONS/CAPITA TWO YEARS LINED CELL CAPACITY (N.pt" rid Imwokslee) POPULATION BEGINNING CAPACITY 2ND YEAR CAPACITY SURPLUS/ VALUE/ CAPACITY ACTUALLY USED ACTUAL LOS FISCAL CO -VIDE CAPACITY REQUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED (DEFICIENCY) COST At PROVIDED YEAR WEIGHTED AVG. AVAILABLE 1.39 REQUIRED IN CIP ZNO YEAR LOSS S9.42 ....... ------..... .............................. 90-91 177,171 •.... 1,907,673 246,268 Z53,656 0 1,407,750 13, 261, 001 248,230 224,433 1.1 1.2 91-92 188,897 1,661,405 262,567 270,444 1,152,213 2,310,608 21:765:924 0.0 92.93 201,876 2,581,052 280,608 289,026 0 2,011,418 18,947,553 0.0 93-94 214,855 2,300,4<4 295,649 307,608 200,000 1,894,187 17,843,246 0.0 94-95 227,934 2,201,795 316,689 326,190 0 1,558.916 14,684, 990 0.0 95-96 241,046 1,885,106 335,054 345.106 0 1,204,947 11,350,598 7, 836, 962 0.0 96-97 254,493 1,550,052 353.745 364,355 0 831,949 14,405,635 0.0 97-95 267,940 1.196,307 372,437 383,610 1,089,000 1,529,261 884 10.339, 883 0.0 98-99 281,386 1.912,870 391,127 402.860 0 1, 118, 689,813 6, 498,043 0.0 99-00 294,833 1.521,744 4D9,818 422,112 0 0 239,8T7 2,259,636 0.0 00-01 309,051 1,111,926 429,581 442,468 0.0 01102 324,042 682,345 450,418 463,931 0 (232,004) (2,185,481) Po POPULATION BEGINNING CAPACITY 29D YEAR CAPACITY SURPLUS/ VALUE/ x CO -WIDE CAPACITY REQUIRED CAPACITY PLANNED (DEFICIENCY) COST AT PERIOD WEIGHTED AVG. AVAILABLE 1.5500 REQUIRED IN CIP 2R0 YEAR LOSS 511.00/I04 QTIME 4 ............................................ -------------- ......------.........------... ............... PRESENT TO 188,897 1.661.405 262,567 270,444 1,152,213 2,310,603 21,765,924 b 9/30/92 5 YEAR GROWTH 65,596 (111.353) 91,179 93,914 200,OD0 10/l/92.9/30/97 (� 5-YEAR SUBTOTAL 254,493 1,550,052 353,71.5 364,353 1,382,213 2,214,162 20,857,108 10/1/92-9/30/97 2ND 5-YR GROWTH 69,549 (867,707) 96,673 99,573 1, 089, ON 10/t/97-9/30/02 10 YEAR TOTAL 324,042 682,345 450,418 463,931 1,289,000 1,056,996 9,956,899 10/1192-9130/02 NOTES: •forty (40%) percent reduction due to Materiels processing. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT # 1000 PROJECT NAME: LAND ACQUISITION ADJACENT TO NAPLES LANDFILL DESCRIPTION: 270 ACRES (approximately) TOWARDS EVENTUAL 300 ACRES TOTAL LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (#) (Planninq District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: ACRES DEPARTMENT: ,SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: 102.3 ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: 27_ 0 ACRES FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - ear Construction Land Construction Other Total C Prior 1991-92 1000 1000 Forecast 1992-93 500 500 Budget Year 1993-94 1200 1200 1994-95 1000 1000 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 3700 3700 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units To be determined Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ None BOOK 05$ PA,� 280 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT 1 1001 � : : PROJECT NAME: LEACHATE TREATMENT DESCRIPTION: RUN-OFF MANAGEMENT AND PROCESSING PLANT AND RETENTION POND PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (i) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ,SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LA14DFILL Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 50 50 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1425 1425 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 50 1425 1475 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units To be determined Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ None BOOK 058 PASE 281 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT N 1003 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELL 6. PHASE III DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT LINED CELL AREA PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (,#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: TONS DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: NIA FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other ota C Prior 2,166' 2,100 1991-92 1,200 1,200 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 3,300 3,300 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 4 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A WK 058 Fa'-t 282 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT 1 1004 \ PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CELLS 3 & 4 CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: COVER AND CLOSE LANDFILL AS PER DER SPEC. PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (1) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: ,SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATIONS NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: N/A Year Prior 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Construction Land Construction Other 1,800 Total 1,800 Total 1,800 1,800 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A BOOK 058 PAIA 283' ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY NIA (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update 4 Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM ;TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT $ 1005 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL CLOSURE CELL 6, PHASE I DESCRIPTION: COVER/CLOSE LANDFILL AS PER DER SPECS. PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior C• 1991-92 1,280 1,280 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 1,280 1,280 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ CNumber of Units N/A Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A 500K 0558PAcc284— CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update & Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT # 1006( PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL DESCRIPTION: DEVELOP 300 ACRES OF LAND PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK O (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: TONS DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: 200,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pro - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior 1991-92 292 292 `. Forecast 1992-93 773 450 1,223 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 253 253 1995-96 ill 11,066 11,177 1996-97 250 250 Future 250 26,964 27,214 Total 1,929 38,480 40,409 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units �10 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A bou 058 PAGE 285 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT 1 1006 PROJECT NAME: NAPLES LANDFILL DESCRIPTION: DEVELOP 300 ACRES OF LAND PROJECT LOCATION: 7 ROYAL FAKAPALM CREEK (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: TONS DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: NAPLES LANDFILL Size of This Project: 200,000 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Other Total Prior C1991-92 292 292 Forecast 1992-93 773 450 1,223 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 253 253 1995-96 111 11,066 11,177 1996-97 250 250 Future 250 26,964 27,214 Total 1,929 38,480 40,409 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ CNumber of Units Gross Cost $ Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A 6DOK 058 PAct 286 ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY 10 (years) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: SOLID WASTE PROJECT 1007 PROJECT NAME: IKMOKALEE LANDFILL CELL 2 PHASE II DESCRIPTION: NEW LINED CELL CONSTRUCTION (10 ACRES) f PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKALEE (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: TONS DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: IMMOKALEE LANDFILL Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction other ota Prior - - 1991-92 Forecast 1992-93 200 200 Budget Year 1993-94 2,180 2,180 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 200 2,180 2,380 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ Number of Units 10 Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - approximately Net Impact $ NIA 500K 05's pn� 287 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Fourth Annual Update i Amendment (1992) PROJECT SUMMARY FORM TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY: LANDFILL CAPACITY/CLOSURE PROJECT # 1008 PROJECT NAME: CLOSURE LANDFILL CELL I. IMMOKALEE DESCRIPTION: CELL I CLOSURE PROJECT LOCATION: 11 IMMOKALEE (#) (Planning District Name) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY IMPACT ON DEFICIENCY DIVISION: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Unit of Measurement: N/A DEPARTMENTS SOLID WASTE 1992-97 Total Deficiency: N/A ORGANIZATION: IMMOKALEE LANDFILL Size of This Project: N/A FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($ IN THOUSANDS) Pre - Year Construction Land Construction Ot a Total Prior C1991-92 675 675 Forecast 1992-93 Budget Year 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 Future Total 675 675 IMPACT ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE OF FACILITY First Year of Impact Cost per Unit $ CNumber of Units NIA Gross Cost $ (years) Less User Revenue - Net Impact $ N/A BOOK 058 PALE 288' APPENDIX C COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCING CAPACITY FOURTH �,L..VUAL CIE UPDATE AND AMENDMENT FY 92-97 T Prepared by Growth Management Department WK 058 PAGE 289 C. LIST OF TABLES Table # Title Page 1 General Governmental Revenues by Source 7 2 General Governmental Expenditures by Function 8 3 Bond Issuance, Debt Service & Direct Capital Outlay 9 Capacity 4 Ratio of General Bonded Debt to Assessed Values and 10 General Bonded Debt Per Capita 5 Schedule of Water & Sewer Funds Revenue -Bond Coverage 11 6 Forecast Models Statistical Measures BOOK 058 Pac[ 290 12 COLLIER COUNTY l Capital Improvement Financing Capacity FY 92-96 Introduction This forecast of Collier County's capacity to finance growth and existing deficits related capital improvement through 1996 has been prepared as a component of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan in compliance with Rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code. The forecasts, projections and estimates presented in this section have been prepared as tools to aid County officials and staff in planning for the period 1992-1996. None of the figures appearing in this report are to be construed as absolute in terms of reliability or as reflecting the intent of Collier County elected or appointed officials. These projections present some possible alternatives given a set of assumptions and variables. The variables are subject to change by action of the Hoard of County Commissioners or their appointed County Manager or in some cases may be affected by changes in the level of economic activity. The forecasts and analyses presented in this section are based on established and tested statistical methods which predict future trends based on past economic and demographic records. significant changes in the variables affecting these trends, i.e., the economic climate, C the propensity of people to migrate to Collier County, and the willingness of the electorate to finance government initiatives would impact the viability of the forecasts presented in this section. 4 This analysis and the Third Annual CIE Update and Amendment has been prepared subsequent to the November 1990 defeat of the 7th Cent Sales Tax Referendum. As a result, in June, 1991 the Collier County Hoard of County Commissioners reiterated their intention to utilize a County -wide Road Improvement Assessment District to maintain adopted roads Levels of Service (Concurrency). Current and projected revenues are anticipated to be adequate to maintain all other adopted LOS for public facilities. Summary of Findings The narrative, analysis and tables in this report establish that Collier County has the financial capacity during the period 1992-1996 to provide the infrastructure and capital improvements needed by its citizens. Applying a set of conservative assumptions and variables the County, through prudent management of its resources, could comfortably assume additional general obligation debt, revenue bonds, and "pay as you go" capital improvements. The goals and levels of service standards in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan are attainable within the financing capacity of Collier County through FY95/96. - 1 - BOOK 058 PAu 291 I Hiahliahts + $155,980,000 in additional debt capacity with revenues currently in place at 13% of bondable revenues limit + Capital Revenue millage levy at a stable 1.0 mill through 1996 will generate $87,850,000 + Maintenance of a maximum bonded debt to taxable value ratio of less than 0.8% if all capacity was utilized at 13% of bondable revenues limit + $14�824;000 in additional utility revenue bonding capacity with no significant rate increases + -Approximately 5 Mills of unused revenue raising capacity available :tLL:t,tu, and of County Commissioners against the constitutional 10 Mill cap. VIE- ,... , .. sit... =wti..• r •..rvai.r . r 2 coax 058 PAGi 292 t YN COLLIER COUNTY l Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Demographic i Fiscal Forecasts FY 92-96 I. POPULATION AND TAXABLE PROPERTY BASE Collier County population grew at an exponential rate during the period 1976-91 for a total increase of 170%. This pattern of rapid growth is forecast to continue at the same or a slightly higher periodic rate to 225,200 in 1996, an increase of 28% over 1991 (Table 4, Column 2). As population has grown, so has the taxable property base. This is due to the combined impact of a rapid increase in the County's real property inventory due to new construction and the appreciation of existing real property which is a reflection of demand for housing by the influx of new residents. Since the 1981 re-evaluation, assessed property values have increased by 226%. Assessed property values are forecast to increase to $21,191,000,000 in 1996 (Table 4, Column 3). This will provide an ample ad valorem tax base to fund both "pay as you go" and bond financing of infrastructure expansion and capital improvements in the CIE to meet the needs of the rapidly growing population in Collier County. CII. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES Tax collections and intergovernmental transfers, consisting predominantly of ad valorem, sales, and gas taxes, are the primary source of revenue for government operations. These revenues are also the most bondable revenues available to the County, resulting in favorable terms and interest rates from lenders. These revenues will continue to grow from 78% of total revenues in 1990 to 81% in 1996 (Table 1, Columns 2 and 4). Due to the Florida constitutional prohibition against a State income tax and the improbability of a change in public or political attitudes opposing this revenue source during the forecast period FY92-96, the State will experience continued difficulties eliminating deficits in capital facilities for which it is responsible. Most notably, State Roads improvements will have to be funded by Collier County taxpayers during the period FY92-96 in order to maintain FDOT mandated levels of service. An additional 4 cent per gallon gas tax passed in the 1990 Legislative session will help but not eliminate the State Roads do=ficit in Collier County. With the defeat of the 7th Cent Sales Tax, the major portion of the burden for infrastructure and capital improvements during the period FY92-96 will fall on the real property owners of Collier County, The County is currently preparing the initial technical and nexus studies to establish a County -wide Road Improvement Assessment District as the Cdeficit revenue source per CIE Policy 1.2.9. - 3 - HOK 058 nu 293 If current revenues are inadequate Collier County also has more latitude to levy additional ad valorem taxes to finance CIE infra- structure capital projects than numerous Florida counties which are currently at or approaching the constitutional 10 mill cap. The Collier county -wide millage for FY 90/91 is 4.4489 which includes the 1 mill levy for a Capital Revenue Fund for both CIE and non -CIE capital projects. The projections in this report are based on the conservative assumption that the Capital Revenue Fund millage levy will remain constant at 1 mill for the forecast period 1992-1996. III, GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENSES Revenues are forecast to grow from FY 92-96 in step with the County's rapid population growth and economic expansion. Expenses are projected to grow at a slightly slower rate with the costs for Public Safety contributing the most alarming increases. Collier's growing population has supported significant annual increases to the Sheriff's budget over recent fiscal years. If this trend continues, additional Ad Valorem tax increases may be necessary during the period FY92-96. However, the County has significant unused revenue raising capacity to finance the infrastructure and facilities capital improvements necessary to maintain the quality of life for Collier County residents identified in the adopted Levels of Service in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. With a prudent balance between bond issues and "pay-as-you-go" funding from the 1 mill Capital Revenue Fund, the County should have the financial ability to meet the demands of its citizens and maintain concurrency in the 1990's. IV, DEBT CAPACITY The ability to finance additional bond issues may be of critical importance if Collier County is to adequately meet the needs of its citizens in the 1990's. Table 3 presents an estimate of maximum additional bond issues and "pay as you go" capital improvement funds available to the County based on forecast revenues for the period FY92-96. Maximum comfortable debt service as a percentage of current bondable revenues is assumed to be 13%. This is in keeping with recent decisions by the electorate and the Board of County Commissioners as reflected in CIE Policy 1.2.12. For example, Debt Service Expenses in 1986 were 13.2% of bondable revenues. Under this assumption, the County could incrementally assume an additional $155,980,000 in bonds through 1996 (Table 3, Column 6). An additional $87,850,000 will be available from the 1 Mill Capital Revenue Fund for "pay as you go" capital improvements, contingencies, and as a buffer against forecast variances (Table 3, Column 8). The projections on additional debt capacity are carried forward and added to existing general bonded debt to produce the forecasts on Table 4, Columns 4-6 for 1992-1996. Under the previously described assumption of a 13% comfort zone, Table 4, Column 4, shows the resulting total general bonded debt if all additional capacity from current revenues were used for general obligation bands. The maximum ratio of general bonded debt to taxable value would still be less than 0.80% in 1996. - 4 - BOOK 058 PAGE 294 (V. WATER 6 SEWER FUNDS BONDED DEBT CAPACITY Net revenue available to fund new bond issues in the utility funds and to maintain the required 1.25 coverage ratio would allow the issuance of an additional $146,824,000 in utility bonds through 1996. Gross revenue (Table 5, Column 2) is projected to grow at an annual rate of 8% based on new customer connections. VI. IKPACT FEE REVENUES Impact fees, which shift a proportionate share of the cost for new facilities to support a growing population from property owners to new arrivals, have become a cornerstone of the Collier County CIE Financing Plan. The addition of impact fees for Emergency Medical Services and Law Enforcement in FY92 to the current roads, libraries, parks, water and sewer impact fees will generate $1,365,000 during the period FY92-96. Additionally, a nexus study is currently underway which may result in the road impact fee being doubled or possibly tripled. This study is part of the technical preparation for establishment of the County -wide Road Improvement Assessment District. Forecasting Methodology The projections and estimates appearing in Tables 1-5 for the forecast fiscal years 1992-1996 were prepared using standardized time series forecasting and analysis techniques. Historical financial data for the fourteen year period 1976-1990 (1981-1990 for Taxable Value) appearing in "Collier County, Florida Comprehensive Annual Financial Report," for the year ended September 30, 1990 were used to prepare C estimates for the fiscal years 1992-1996. Statistical measurement models of various types were tested for all time series on Tables 1-5 and various other relevant series not appearing in the final report. A five step process was applied to each series to select the model and resulting forecast which produced the most realistic estimates as follows: Analytical Steps 1. iiasic statistical tests of all time series data for randomness and autocorrelation to determine the most suitable analytical model. 2. Prepare regression trend models and forecasts types: linear trend, exponential trend, and polynomial trend for all time series. 3. Compare statistical measures generated for each model and resulting forecast to select the model which best fits each time series. Prepare Box -Jenkins models for historical series that did not fit well into regression trend analysis. See note below. 5. Consolidate historical time series models and forecasts into projecticns of Collier County financial strength through 1995. - 5 - BOOK 058 PAG[ 295 nox-�enxins Moaeiina Calculation Method - Marquard non -linear least squares with back- ground stepwise elimination of non -significant coefficients. Lodged Models - Automatically selected for time series when appropriate. Automatic Differencing, autoregressive and moving Identification - average conversions applied via auto - correlation function when appropriate. baLK 058phU296 - 6 - COLLIER COUMrY MORIDA GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES BY SOURCE (1) $(000) 1976 - 1990 Historical 1991 - 1996 Projected (Unaudited) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fiscal Genera Public Pbvsical Trans- Economic Human Culture i Recreation DebG Service Totals Year Government Safety Environment portation Environment Services $ 516 $ 822 $12,792 1976 5 3,373 $ 3,259 $ 1,674 $1,757 $ 411 $ 980 641 898 14,696 1977 3,541 4,020 1,502 2,283 877 934 1,236 177 94B 18,333 1978 5,051 4,411 1,186 2,579 2,145 866 948 1,120 19.9E7 1979 4,433 6,237 904 3,449 2.010 1.=01_ 1,1.'7 973 '3,269 1980 �a5 7,'27 1,]59 4,S16 1,741 1,795 1,336 1,277 558 0 1981 5,v14 8,347 1,356 4,214 1:857 _,570 2,284 2,284 30,9C0 30,900 1982 ".579 .0,440 1,677 4,76- 726 2,003 1.563 3,708 34,401 1983 8,326 10,809 870 5.120 2.002 1,396 2,017 1,703 5,677 37.S09 Co I 1984 8,213 12,388 99S 5,120 739 2,203 1,858 5,934 42,284 a p 1985 ills 15,197 1,261 5,377 413 2,507 2,285 5.599 48,696 1986 1:,546 18,443 2,290 5,613 695 3.202 2,824 7,433 57,611 1987 13,207 22,184 2,313 5,7S3 3.830 3,55:: 6,709 64,282 cm 00. 1988 25,314 2,092 2,908 6,242 871 6,620 1,390 3,Is0 4,38u 6,847 78,058 1989 1.i,i51 33,a-:3 6,517 1,143 4.153 4,989 7,656 90,818 1990 22,072 39,915 4,373 4,566 6,857 1,224 4.180 5,867 7,618 98,415 1991 1992 :�.075 44,828 53,2A1 4,759 7,11-7 1,353 4.506 6,89^ 7,531 111,895 1993 _",309 29,996 63,2j4 4,951 7,537 1,497 4,831 8,113 9,540 8,042 9,029 128,201 146,607 1994 34,2CO 75,101 5,144 1,877 1,656 5,060 5,286 11,218 7,991 168,069 1995 38,993 89,196 5,337 8,217' 1,831 5,513 13,192 3,392 193.503 1996 44,458 105,936 5,529 8,557 2,026 Note, (1) Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds ^TADLE 2 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA RATIO OF GENERAL BOJfDED DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUES AND GENERAL BONDED DEBT PER CAPITA 1976 - 1991 Historical 1992 - 1996 Projected (unaudited) 1 2 3 4 S 6 Maximum Potential Ratio of General Fiscal Taxable Value General Bonded Boede______a Debt to Debt Per Year Population (in Millions) Debt (1) Taxable Value Capita 1976 64,800 5 1,675 5 1,627,529 0.10% S 25.12 1977 68,900 1,726 1,505,308 0.09 21.85 1978 74,600 1,856 1,396,511 0.08 18.72 1979 82,000 1,998 1,276,615 0.06 15.57 1980 86,000 2,154 1,138,953 0.05 13.25 1981 91,100 3,926 1,048,457 0.03 11.51 9.73 0 1982 98,100 4.108 954,261 0.02 0.16 84.26 1983 100,900 5,443 8,501,709 0.15 80.43 O 1984 109,400 5,859 8,799,135 0.13 71.70 1985 118,900 6,427 8.524,855 0.1.2 198fi 126,000 7,142 9,J52,000 63.28 p r o 1987 130,600 7,7JS 8,915,000 0.12 1988 139,000 8,435 8,633,000 0.10 .1 53 81 53. 1 1989 152,600 9,253 8,212,000 0.09 46.77 1990 165,400 10,893 7,735,000 0.07 44.42 1991 175,400 12,799 7,792,000 0.07 0.50 385.11 1992 185,400 14,411 71,400,000 0.55 438.20 1993 195,300 15,648 85.581,000 0.63 529.40 1994 205,300 17.376 ,108,686,000 627.99 1995 215,300 19,224 135,208,000 0.71 716.11 1996 225,200 21,191 161,340,000 0.17 Notes: (1) Maximum potential general bonded debt for forecast years 1992-1996 is the sum of current issues and Column 6, Table 3. For demonstration, the assumption is that 13♦ of current revenues would be used to fund G.O.B. debt. TPJ= 4 1 [l 1 0 0 v Y Y !, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA SCEEDULE OF WATER L SEWER FUNDS REVENUE BOND COVERAGE (1) 1979 - 1990 Bistorical 1991 - 1996 Projected (unaudited) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Additional Debt Service Net Revenue Capacity 2 Incremental Available for Existing Coverage Bond Issuance Fiscal Gross New Debt Service Debt Service (5) Coverage Ratio (4) Ratio 1.25 Capacity (6) Year 1979 Revenue (2) 5 1,557,079 Expenses (3) 5 983,091 5 573,988 5 423,803 1.35 N/A N/A N/A 1980 1,699,207 1,067,645 631,562 209,732 3.01 N/A N/A tt/A 1981 2,435,973 1,299,388 1,136,585 274,384 4.14 1982 5,225,163 1,841,494 3,383,699 1,122,859 3.01 NSA N/A N/A 1983 6,121,650 2,024,768 4,096,882 2,389,893 1.71 N/A 1984 6,138,269 2,616,489 3,521,780 2,827,433 1.25 N/A N/A 1985 7,200,588 3,319,489 3,880,708 2,621,693 1.48 N/A N/A 1986 7,980,000 3,903,000 4,077,000 2,161,000 1.89 N/A 1987 10,748,000 5,048,000 5,700,000 2,484,000 2.29 NSA N/A 1988 14,534,000 5,960,000 8,574,000 3,997,000 2.14 N/A 1989 18,394.000 5,529,000 12,866,000 6,078,000 2.12 N/A 4/A 1990 21,986,000 8,723,000 13,263.000 7,036,000 1.89 4,802,000 59,892,000 1991 23,745,000 9,420,000 14,325,000 8,323;000 1.72 1992 25,644,000 10,175,000 15,469,000 8,073,000 1.92 2.00 1,193.000 1,666,000 14.867,000 18,307,000 1993 27,696,000 10,988,000 16,708,000 8,340,000 666,000 8,307,000 1994 29,911,000 11,867,000 18,044,000 9,142,000 1.97 2.17 1,430,000 17,835,000 1995 32,30S,000 12,817,000 19,488,000 8,965,000 2.38 1,617,000 1996 34,889,000 13,842,000 21,047,000 8,860,000 $ 146,824,000 Notes: (1) No bonds outstanding prior to 1979 - coverage applies to the County Water -Sewer District, Marco Hater and Sewer District, Goodland Water District, and Pelican Bay Improvement District beginning it EY 1990- (2) operating revenues plus other income exclusive of extraordinary gains. Projections based on annual 8� increase in customers served. (3) Total expenses excluding depreciation, bond interest, amortization, and extraordinary 106e80. (4) Net revenue divided by total debt service requirements. Bond covenants require that the ratio not fall below 1.25. (5) Debt Service on current bond issues through 1996. (6) Bonds are assumed to be issued at a 30 year maturity with an 71 average interest rate. TABLE 5 C 1 FJ FORECAST MODELS STATISTICAL 10rASVALS Table Column Forecast Model R-Square Chisv /41 ' =-`> _� rronablilt♦ ' 2 2 Exponential Trend (log) 0.9819 4.74 794.4 6.41 31.4% 2 3 Exponential Trend (log) 0.9936 5.81 995.6 5.4% 21.3% 2 4 Simple Average (differenced) N/A 3.79 598.3 26.81 43.6% 2 S Box -Jenkins (differenced) N/A 3.14 361.3 5.6% 53.6% 2 6 Box -Jenkins (x 106% FY91-95) N/A 2.23 601.0 59.81 69.1% 2 7 Box -Jenkins (differenced) N/A 1.19 291.9 12.0% 88.0% 2 8 Box -Jenkins (log differenced) N/A 5.82 109.8 5.1% 21.2% 2 See Note 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 3 Polynomial Trend 0.9073 8.68 622.3 31.6% 6.91 1 4 See Note 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 5 Box -Jenkins (differenced) N/A 5.41 646.4 32.6% 24.7% 1 6 Polynomial Trend 0.9569 2.83 210.0 19.31 58.9% v c 1 7 Polynomial Trend 0.8102 7.00 623.3 18.2% 13.4% 0 4 3 Polynomial Trend (FY81-89) 0.9859 9.87 434.6 5.1% 4.2% O ' Cil v N , Notes: 1. Tax receipts are forecast to increase 13% annually through FY96 as a result of an average 61 increase per year in new construction, a 61 increase in market value of existing property and a 11 increase in millage rate. Z1,7 2. Collier County has experienced increases in intergovernmental revenues ranging from 10% to 20% in recent years. An average increase of 151 per year is forecast through FY96. Statistical models, and resulting forecasts were developed bylthe Collier County Growth management Department using personal computers and the statistical forecasting software, Pno•CAST, from Fleming Software, Oakton, Virginia. L1 TA= 6 l/1 A APPENDIX D COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1992-93-TO 199647 BOOK 058 PAGE 303 I APPENDIX D COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 to 1996-97 The Collier County School Board provides for public education within the County including incorporated and unincorporated areas. The five -member School Board has no regulatory authority over land use, however, it does influence land use and public facility decisions through required expansion of education facilities on existing sites, its exchange of predetermined school sites, and its selection of additional school sites for future development. The responsibility of Collier County under the Growth Management Act has been to review the School Board's Capital Improvement Program to determine consistency with the comprehensive plan, corresponding land development regulations, and any impact on the County's public facilities. In addition, Rule 9J-5.016(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code .(F.A.C.), requires "The geographic service area and location of major C system components for the public education and public health systems within the local government's jurisdiction shall be identified" (in the Growth Management Plan's Capital Improvements Element). Also, Rule 9J-5.016(2)(d) requires the County to analyze "the impact of new or improved public educational and public health care systems and facilities on the provision of infrastructure." In 1590, the Florida State Legislature (HB 3709) voted to require that local. school boards submit a Notice of Intent to construct a school facility 90 days prior to submitting an application to a city or county; and the city or county must, once a complete application is received, determine within 90 days whether the proposal is consistent with the local Growth Management Plan and land development regulations. The purpose of this appendix is to analyze the School Board's Capital Improvements Plan and its potential impact upon the County's public facilities, including Roads, Sanitary Sewers, Potable Water, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Parks and Recreation. NOTE: This analysis only includes public education facilities; there are no local public health facilities within Collier County. - 1 - BOOK 058 PAGE 304 r ANALYSIS ¢U'UDENT POPULATION School Board population projections reflect an 59% increase in the total number of students attending the County's public schools, grades K - 12, over the next ten years -- 1991 through 2001. k Student Population 1991 2001 Increase Elementary School 11,942 17,470 46% Middle School 5,100 8,977 76% High School 5,322 9,018 M TOTAL 22,364 35,465 59% Mf PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Additional classrooms dedicated to new or expanded educational programs mandated by the State for the exceptional child (mentally or physically handicapped) also impact the number of student stations required over the next decade. An increasing percentage of public school funding is required to support special education facilities and programs. PM with an increasing student population and new program demands, the School Board estimates that over $226 million will be needed over the next six (6) years (1992-1997) for the renovation of existing school facilities and the planning, site work, construction and furnishing of four (4) new Elementary Schools, three (3) new Middle Schools and one new High School. An estimated $6 million will be required to remodel and upgrade the County's adult and vocational educational facilities. PM TAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUNDING SOURCES The Collier County School Board has prepared a new six -year Capital Outlay Plan, 1992-1997, and funding plan. The Plan reflects a capital outlay based on -funding that includes but is not limited to the following revenue programs: 2.0 Mill Capital Tax Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) Certificates of Participation (COP) General obligation Bonds Impact Fees Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) are funds derived from the gross; receipts tax on utilities collected by the State and expended on D.O.E. approved projects. - 2 - 600K 058 PAGC 305 l Certificates of Participation (C.O.P.) is a funding program used to `. liquidate principal and interest in the form of rent payments on specific school facilities. Since the Florida Supreme Court upheld the legality of C.O.P.'s as a capital funding source, the School Board has restored all projects to its long-range capital plan. Impact Fees which are assessed against the construction of a dwelling unit at the time a permit is issued or when a Certificate of Occupancy is issued were initiated by the Board of County Commissioners on October 10, 1992 as a means to help defray the capital construction costs of educational facilities in Collier County. The Collier County School Board's capital projects are not included in the County's Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element (CIE). However, approximately 90% of the revenues required to support the school's capital programs is dependent upon local revenue sources. source Percent Federal 0 % State 10 Local 90 k EXISTING SCHOOL AND SUPPORT FACILITIES Collier County is divided into three (3.) geographic school service areas: Naples/Marco Island, Immokalee, and Everglades City. At C present, over one thousand (1,000) acres have been identified by the School Board for educational facilities in Collier County and the City of Naples. The following schools and support facilities can be located on the map on page 6 of this appendix. (The Public Facilities Map 2 of the Growth Management Plants Future Land Use Element will be amended to reflect the School Board's current land holdings and site acquisitions.) MAPLES/MARCO AREA FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MAPS ACRES 2 Avalon Elementary 11.25 4 Big Cypress Elementary 20.30 6 Golden Gate Elementary 15.56 8 Golden Terrace Elementary 14.91 10 Lake Park Elementary 9.91 li Lely Elementary 22.00 15 Naples Elementary 20.92 17 Poinciana Elementary 18.49 19 Sea Gate Elementary 15.00 20 Shadowlawn Elementary 11.88 21 Tommie Barfield Elementary 21.29 22 Vineyards Elementary 18.00 - 3 - 600K 058 PAGE 306 NAPLES/MARCO AREA FACILITIES MIDDLE SCHOOLS Ku' 1� 16 Pine Ridge Middle c Gulfview Middle 7 Golden Gate Middle 5 East Naples Middle HIGH SCHOOLS 3 Barron G. Collier High 12 Lely High 14 Naples High (includes Troy Property) SUPPORT FACILITIES 1 Administrative Center 13 Maintenance/Transportation 18 Production/Warehouse ADULT i VOCATIONAL FACILITIES 23 J. Lorenzo Walker Vocational Technical Center EVERGLADES 24 Everglades School (X - 12) IMMORALEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 26 Highlands 29 Lake Trafford 30 Pinecrest 31 Village Oaks MIDDLE SCHOOLS 27 Old Immokalee Middle New Immokalee Middle HIGH SCHOOL 28 Immokalee High EDUCATION FACILITIES 25 Bethune Education Center TOTAL ACRES OF EXISTING FACILITIES -4- BOOK 058 PAGE 307 f r x� ACRES 36.88 10.62 26.94 17.09 80.00 50.57 23.89 3.00 20.00 3.00 22.60 3.69 C 13.27 15.00 9.50 20.00 .r 7.33 23.60 43.41 15.00 rf. 644.90. y LAHP HOLDINGS AND SITE ACQUISITIONS C Future planning and commitments have been made to secure additional sites for expansion and construction of new growth school facilities. At present, sixteen (16) vacant and proposed sites have been identified for future educational facilities. VACANT i PROPOSED SITES MAP z, if ACRES 32 North Pine Ridge Road Site/Barron Collier 79.09 33 Golden Gate Estates Site 64.00 34 The Southwest of the Southwest N of the Northwest of 2.50 the Southeast of Section 27, Township 51 South, Range 29 East 35 Hendry Property 0.65 36 Heath -Roberts Property (New Immokalee Middle School) 23.60 ; 37 The Southwest of the Northeast I of the Southeast of 4.74 the Southwest '�, Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East 38 Henderson Property 1.00 h 39 Gran Property 92.04 40 Deltona Settlement 11.60 41 Deltona Settlement 13.20 42 Deltona Settlement 12.00 s 43 Orangetree PUD 24.98 44 Golden Gate East of Golf Course 19.86 45 Pelican Bay Exchange 20.00' 46 Pelican Bay Exchange 39.03 ;> 47 Parklands PUD 20.00 TOTAL ACRES VACANT i PROPOSED SITES: 428.29 COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TOTAL ACREAGE: 1,073.19 5 - BOOK 058 PAGE"QB kr f � ,.�ra��.;�' �c�rrs�.• � �,r� ::,iysas"�� � ,.�r�is�` stibi+�s.�'r� �`��yyi.r R,� •*- ' "' - CO!1=R COUNTY ?USUC SCNOO'_S =-U:Ft COUT.M. F1DFU07. LLCM a mwc fom •anon rasa t■as • t■a+rl a>a e .�.tae trn F. nL.Y_' f: [03D Cr•�T CDrw.: l_.^Att' R QMi�` t{i� r.'_' tb'-CDr Mara WWf6&c■•t ■eac 1. pD••rCiaKaK col-M tam ML WCR.M" WbWPMAR L wnttAl nAdpfL Y Mn 37. iroVLR r■ttaL r.D Arta nnranrm 2n3D aL NUDE LArrm anawcr i CAt1 aMRO 14MRi L Ccudw "W rLooRdTt I?A tier a4 V.-co'ca 6ac natltr 3L %UAW •{IQ T. esm C41L 1.=LL a■+. 3L total ■K roc br m[/ L tnnOr 7••tKL SUAMCiARYY IL oars. arWow I'm ia■i D"Vm CKLLM a •sm M1t EMIM Ru to. LIT rr•: omJfuRr IL tar ndIXURr tall" ZLDD BL 7- =. voter A R%riK a..et f UST u tar 1 30-M XaJ7 a toner ewvo[R U U&MID I3C/MWO MIA 3n 3L WAIK-AMMIO[II D1b'ORY 1s_ kI PUM Rao toot;. 33" c� 1+.�...rr -) I- 1w1. r'."-•1'i 3L f¢+a a tD.s� ci Arne tL WIU3 n.ne aaonwer {L ►•C now tmt 3ua: 3u a..sc s usr 3L rdmdovmoe rrOraitr ". rtatO.ru WL VMARY IL-3L a PIaP'Om AL 'rcMjcb- o-K"o 0[ Olm b or- D ■f:ra - ia iU O 7z ftna7 13" 4L vmlu Y scrnziew, m IMDOt.trw nDNXIY 1L C aGlOu 7CrnmoDr n lo..c wlme cwl!xl er ra It ol.lst-DCr von 32 vlo- : tu3cpnr 160E ti DQSO' na0: E&L V 1 1 t00= .Meat NW-10.1 � 41 =2 T I Tc ..=t. Mint aL PcLr- aµr OOw2 3a rVC-LA'a 200Ct4 D3K 4% P-2...z tw 1 �.•.. aC{.tM mtf�tow IWiV 110E a C. M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY FOR 1992-1997 EVERGLADES AREA Renovation and improvements of the Everglades school (K - 12) are scheduled to begin in 1996/97 at an estimated cost of $3,050,000. y t: F i IMMORALEE AREA Pinecrest Elementary School will be expanded in 1992-1993 at an estimated cost of $3,000,000. An expansion and upgrade of Highlands Elementary School began in 1991- 1992 at a cost of $5,350,000. A new growth Elementary School is scheduled for completion in 1996- 1997 at an estimated cost of $11,800,000 for planning, construction and equipment. A new Middle School, funded from prior year projects brought forward, was completed in 1991. An additional $4.5 million will be needed for construction of a new Preschool Center at the site of the vacated Middle School facility. An expansion of Immokalee High School began in 1991-1992 at a total cost of $11,550,000. MAPLES/MARCO AREA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Renovation of Seagate Elementary School will be completed in 1994-95 at an estimated cost of $450,000. Golden Gate Elementary, Poinciana Elementary, Shadowlawn Elementary, Tommie Barfield Elementary and Naples Park Elementary Schools are scheduled for physical education/recreation facilities and other site development work and improvements at a total estimated cost of approximately $5 million. Big Cypress Elementary School will require an upgrade to its potable water facilities at an estimated cost of $175,000 in 1991-1992. ggg To accommodate growth, three (3) new Elementary Schools are planned f, for construction between 1992 and 1997 at a total cost of approximately $43 million for planning, construction and equipment. Additional Pre-K classrooms are scheduled for construction in 1996/97 at an estimated cost of $2 million. In 1992/93 construction of a new Media Center at Avalon School is estimated to cost approximately $1.5 million. { DOOK Q58 PAG[ 310 7 MAPLES/MARCO AREA MIDDLE SCHOOLS At Pine Ridge Middle School, construction of a second school building, and remodeling of the existing facility, are scheduled for completion by 1993 at an estimated cost of $13,553,097. Construction of two (2)'new growth Middle Schools and planning for a #; third new Middle School in the Naples/Marco area began in 1990-91 at a toted cost of $32,000,000. Remodeling and new construction at Golden Gate and Gulfview Middle Schools is estimated to cost approximately $9.6 million over the next five (5) years. HIGH SCHOOLS In 1992-1993, Barron Collier High School is scheduled for expansion and renovation at a cost of $18,899,472. By 1993, Naples High School and Lely High School are scheduled to be expanded at an estimated cost of nearly $36 million. To accommodate growth, a new High School in the Naples/Marco area, built in two phases and providing 2,300 new student stations, is scheduled to begin construction in 1994-1995 at an estimated cost of / $20,450,000. ADULT i VOCATIONAL SCHOOL The Collier County Vocational Centers in Naples and Immokalee will require expansion and upgrade during the next five (5) years at an estimated cost of over $6 million. LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS At this time there is no indication that the expansion, renovation and new construction of educational facilities over the next five (5) year:a will negatively impact the County's level of service standards on public facilities. All planning for expansion and construction of new facilities on new and existing sites within the unincorporated area of Collier County will be reviewed by the County for compliance with the adopted level of service standards in its Growth Management Plan and corresponding land use regulations. 500K 058 PAGC 311 -a- C. APPENDIX Z TIMING AND LOCATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CURRENT LOCAL PRACTICES Fourth Annual CIE Update & Amendment Prepared by Growth Management Department 1992 BOOK C68 PAGt312 M M C IL TIMING AND LOCATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 9J-5.016(2)(a) requires an analysis of the current local practices that guide the timing and location of construction, extension or increases in capacity of each public facility. 9J-5.016(2)(e) requires an analysis of the use of timing and location of capital improvements to public facilities to support efficient land develop- ment and goals, objectives and policies in the future land use element. This analysis must take into consideration plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction. By definition, public facilities includes transportation, sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, education, parks and recreational, and public health systems or facilities. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS OR FACILITIES The Collier County Transportation Services Division and the Naples/ Collier County MPO coordinate to provide the planning and design of transportation systems and facilities within the County. The primary system of transportation within Collier County is an extensive network of roadways, including federal, state, and county roads. This network must be considered as a single working unit when any type of analysis is performed to evaluate current or projected needs and proposed improvements. The initial planning processes rely on the projected land use types and time of development along witFi any ongoing federal, state, or county roadway improvement projects or programs. Using these projections, anticipated traffic volumes and patterns are developed and analyzed for their effects on the existing roadway net- work improvements, or new roadway corridors, are proposed to adequately handle the anticipated traffic. The planning window for this process is currently held to 5-year and 10-year time frames. For the general municipal area, some very long range planning is also performed using a 25-year time frame window. Once the long range planning identifies a need within the 10-year window, a design and construction timeline is prepared. This timeline includes the various phases of engineering design, right-of-way identification and acquisition, permitting, and construction. Due to the numerous variables that must be considered -for each roadway, each timeline will be different, but most highway construction projects can typically be completed within a three to four year period. In addition to the long range planning process, monitoring programs are utilized to determine the actual traffic patterns and volumes. Data from these programs are analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the planning process and identify specific problem areas. By comparing the data collected through the years, projection mechanisms can be amended to reflect actual operating conditions. Monitoring programs are also used to provide an indication of when a section of roadway is operating insufficiently or is approaching this condition. Both the long range planning and monitoring procedures are utilized to prepare a prioritized transportation capital improvement projects DOOK 058 PAGE 313 M M M list. This list is updated annually to reflect the most up-to-date needs, show the anticipated project timelines, and determine when C funding must be incorporated into the County budget to undertake these ' projects. While sudden growth spurts in individual areas can create localized problems, the general procedures described above are usually' adequate to handle the transportation needs in a timely manner. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to prepare a sanitary sewer facilities development master plan in 1978. This master plan was updated in 1986 in a report entitled "Coastal Collier County 201 Facilities Plan Update." This updated 201 Plan was approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners and provides the Utilities Services Division with the current and projected facilities and populations within the identified sewer service area and a schedule of facility expansions necessary to meet the service needs. The Utility Services Division is currently using the recommended capital improvement program in the 201 Facilities Plan Update to schedule the design and construction of sanitary sewer treatment plants. Collection systems have been analyzed for projected demands based on population projections within the various planning communities of the Future Land Use Element. The corresponding schedule of necessary capital improvements can be followed as long as the observed development remains consistent with the projections. The 201 Facilities Plan Update identifies when an improvement is needed to be put into service, but does not include any scheduling for design, permitting, or construction. Based on the size and type of facility and the need to obtain state and/or federal funding assistance, the lead time can vary from one year for a small collection pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or major collection system project. As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the County sanitary sewer system continues, the Utility Services Division will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary, adjust the facilities scheduling so that the sanitary sewer facility capacity will be available concurrent with future development. SOLID WASTE SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Solid Waste Department is responsible for the design and operational supervision of the solid waste system and facilities within the County. These facilities include a county - operated sanitary landfill and a contract hauler collection system. The present method of facility sizing utilizes the extensive records keeping that has been developed by the Solid Waste Department. The relationship between observed population growth and solid waste disposal requirements allows this department to project the anticipated solid waste disposal needs for projected populations. Incorporating this information into a long range facility site plan r r 2 BOOK 05*8 F4 ,t 314 allows the department to design, locate, and construct environmentally C sound disposal facilities, with the capacity for several years of disposal, at an economical savings. Due to the extensive permitting process and time necessary to construct the larger facility sites, a lead time of approximately two years is necessary for landfill disposal sites. The Solid Waste Department has prepared a master plan which identifies other methods of solid waste disposal. These methods vary from re- cycling to resource recovery through thermal reduction. The timing of construction and implementation of these various methods of solid waste disposal are a part of the master plan. DAAIIiAGE SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Water Management Department is responsible for the scheduling of construction and maintenance projects and programs for the public drainage systems and facilities throughout the un- incorporated portions of the County. Past practice has generally been to coordinate the construction of any new canals with the Collier County Transportation Department's road construction program. The Water Management Department had a consultant prepare a Water Management Master Plan for the entire County which was completed in 1990. This plan will identifies and established -the boundaries for the various watersheds or basins, analyzed the condition and capacity of the existing drainage/water management facilities within each basin, identifies needed improvements to the various facilities to achieve desired level of service standards, and suggested a program j for the phased improvement of the entire County's water management system to produce an environmentally sound network of facilities that can be achieved through an established capital improvement program. Subsequent to the completion of the Water Management Master Plan, a series of individual basin plans will be completed to specifically analyze and design the facilities or improvements needed for each basin where necessary major improvements have been identified by the Master Plan. These basin plans will incorporate any proposed improve- ments by other state or local agencies and the South Florida Water Management District. Current regulatory and fiscal implication practices for constructing or modifying drainage/water management facilities require a lead time of approximately one year for design and permitting and six months to two years for construction. POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Utility Services Division hired a consultant to prepare a potable water facilities development master plan in 1985 and 1986. This document is contained in two volumes entitled "Phase I Water Master Plan for Western Collier County" and "Phase II Water master Plan for Western Collier County." This Water Master Plan was approved as a planning guide by the Board of County Commissioners and ILprovides the Utility Services Division with the projected growth within the identified water service area and a schedule of facility expansions necessary to meet the service needs. - 3 - aoPX 058 PAGE 315 The Utility Services Division is currently using the scheduled capital C improvement program in the Water Master Plan. Since both the existing and proposed water treatment and distribution system have been analyzed for projected demands based on population projections within the various planning communities of the Future Land Use Element, the corresponding schedule of necessary capital improvements can be followed as long as the observed development remains consistent with the projections. The Water Master Plan lists when an improvement is needed to be put into service, but does not include any scheduling for design, permitting, or construction. Based on the size and type of facility, the lead time can vary from one year for a small pipeline project to five years for a treatment plant or wellfield construction project. As projects are completed and the development and expansion of the County potable water system continues, the Utility Services Division will continue to monitor actual growth patterns and, if necessary, adjust the facilities scheduling so that the potable water supply will be available concurrent with future development. EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The District School Board of Collier County is responsible for the planning, operation, and expansion of the educational systems and facilities. This Board utilizes a five-year Comprehensive Educational Plan which is updated annually to identify the projected needs and anticipated funding requirements. In addition to providing adequate .' school facilities, this plan also includes the necessary support facilities such as transportation, administration, warehouse, and maintenance. The process for developing this five-year Comprehensive Educational Plan incorporates several continual planning and evaluation programs. The Florida Department of Education has established some guidelines for determining when new or expanded facilities are needed. These include a five-year survey of existing facilities to evaluate their adequacy. If a rapid increase in student loading creates an over- crowded condition and projections indicate that there is not enough time to institute a five-year survey, there are provisions for conducting a spot survey. Proper planning is essential in this phase of development since a school facility design and construction program requires a lead time ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 years, depending on the type of facility needed. In addition to examining the condition of the facilities, the School Board conducts a continual land evaluation and acquisition program. This program uses the population projections for the County to determine which areas will develop a sufficient student base to justify the construction of schools. Once the projected need is identified, potential land sitos are identified and procedures implemented to obtain title to the land either by purchase, trade agreements, or receipt of contributions. Potential sites are usually identified and obtained a minimum of three years before the construction of facilities is proposed. PARKS AND RECREATIONAL SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department of the Public Services Division is responsible for the planning, operation, and expansion of the County's recreational facilities. A broad based recreation plan has been prepared whereby the County can meet many of the recreational needs of the citizens through the development of community parks located near various population centers. At present, there is no formal method for evaluating capital improvements. Projects are suggested by staff, the general public, the Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Board, the County Manager, or even the individual Commissioners of the Board of County Commissioners. This informal method of recommendation has proven to be very useful in providing the desired recreational facilities within the overall guidelines of the County's recreational plan. PIIBLI9 HEALTH SYSTEMS AM rACI ITIE2 The Collier County Health Department is responsible for the public health facilities operated by the County. The planning and develop- ment of the facilities and programs is generally conducted in response to legislated requirements and directions from the State Health Department. Planning projections are used to predict potential health problem areas, but the department is usually not able to obtain funding assistance until the problems actually develop. While this method of operation is reactive rather than pro -active, the usually rapid response for funding assistance allows the'department to operate Ceffectively in meeting the health needs of the County. L BOOK 058 PAGE 3*17 - 5 - ( COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Financing Plan Fourth Annual Update i Amendment 1992 I. QBJECTIVES Between January, 1987 and August, 1988 the citizens of Collier County joined the County staff and Board of County Commissioners in 197 public meetings, workshops, and hearings. As a result of this community effort, standards of service were set for thirteen (13) types of public facilities. These Level of Service Standards identified in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvement Element define the quality of life and environment that the citizens of Collier County want to maintain as the Growth Management Plan is implemented through the coming years. In order to maintain the Level of Service Standards, eliminate deficiencies and provide new facilities for future growth, the County will need to improve or construct $212,271,000 of infrastructure during the period FY92/93 - FY96/97. To make this Capital Improvement Program financially feasible in accordance with the requirements of Rule 9J-5 F.A.C., the Board of County Commissioners must approve a balanced funding plan from existing and available revenue sources. The existing situation at the outset of this financing plan if all capital revenues currently in place were committed to the CIE to the exclusion of non -CIE projects, during the period covered by the CIE can be summarized as follows: Recommended CIE Projects FY93-97 $212,271,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Gas Taxes 7,561,000 Impact Fees 72,957,600 User Fees 19,408,000 Grants 850,000 • Capital Revenue Fund FY93-97 45,125,000 MSTD (Livingston Road) 16,000,000 $161,901,600 Minimum Additional Revenues Needed $ 50,369,400 CAssumption of a 0.5474 Mill annual levy through FY97. - 1 - BOOK 058 pAu 319 11,_ FINANCIFQ PLAN POLICIES This financing plan for generating additional needed revenues is predicated on the adoption of several policies by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The policies reflect the spirit and intent of the 1985 Growth Management Act, equitable distribution of costs among taxpayers, and sound fiscal policy: Policy 11 Existing facility deficiencies measured against the established Level of Service Standards for the Collier County population at the time of adoption of the Growth Management Plan, January 10, 1989, will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and inter- governmental revenues received based on economic activity. Policy 12 Where the need for a new facility is identified with the projected influx of new residents during the planning period FY93-97, the revenues to build that facility will be generated by impact fees to the extent practical. These impact fees will be set at the maximum level justified by the County's current cost of each facility type, a level which is legally defensible in case of court challenge. Policy 13 Certain large scale projects of significant CourLty-wide impact and cost would, if funded with current ad Valorem taxes in the year of construction, result in an unacceptable millage rate. These projects may be proposed for General Obligation Bonding. The electorate may be asked through referendum to approve the borrowing of funds for the projects and the levy of ad valorem taxes to pay the resulting debt service. The defeat of a referendum on any or all of the projects will result in a lowering of the Level of Service Standard for related facilities. Pot cy 14 The Enterprise funds, i.e. Water, Sewer and Solid Waste are operated on the "service business" concept that the user pays for the service. Therefore, no general or intergovernmental tax revenues will be used for capital projects within these funds. CIE Projects within these funds will be financed by water and sewer impact fees and user fees, Clean Water Act grants and/or loans, landfill fees, and revenue bonds supported by the appropriate levels of user fees. Policy 15 During the implementation period of the CIE of the Growth Management Plan, the assessment ratio for.property valuation for the levy of ad valorem taxes will remain at 100% of "just value" in accordance with Chapter 193.011 F.S. Policy 16 Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application - 2- BOOK 058 PAGE 320 ( of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of restraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State shared revenues, specifically, gas taxes and the half -cent sales tax. The Enterprise funds operate under utility bonding ratios set by the financial markets and existing debt and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. Policy #7 The County will issue Revenue Bonds in FY94 secured by a non -ad valorem covenant to budget and appropriate to fund the revenue shortfall for County road improvements identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy Is The County will use the short-term Commercial Paper Program to advance funds for construction of State Road Projects Nos. 50 and 51 identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements pending pay -backs to the County from FDOT. policy f9 The primary source of funding for CIE Project 1400, County Jail, will be a General Obligation Bond referendum for approval of a bond issue to be financed by a new ad valorem tax. III, FINANCING PLAN DETAIL County Arterial 6 Collector Roads Requested Road Construction Projects FY93-97 $109,293,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Gas Taxes 7,561,000 Impact Fees 34,765,000 MSTD (Livingston Road) 16,000,000 58,326,900 Additional Revenues Needed 50,967,000 BCC adopted Additional Revenue Source: Revenue Bonds (FY94) 50,967,000 Net $ 0 State Roads Network Requested State Road Improvements FY93-97 $ 11,608,000 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: t None Pending FDOT paybacks 0 Additional Revenue Needed 11,608,000 r BCC directed Additional Revenue Sources: ; Commercial Paper Program 11,608,000 Net $ 0 I' b00K U58 PAGE 321 3 - M _ Water and Sewer System Requested Water and Sewer Projects FY93-97 15,530,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source: System Development Fees/User Fees 15,530,000 Net $ 0 Solid waste Requested Landfill Projects FY93-97 $ 19,408,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source: Landfill Tipping Fees 19,408,000 Net $ 0 Emergency Medical service Requested EMS Unit Construction $ 1,728,000 Projects FY93-97 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: EMS Impact Fees 1,728,000 Net $ 0 Jail Facility Requested Jail Expansion Projects FY93-97 $ 26,242,000 LESS Existing Revenue Source: None Identified 0 Additional Revenue Needed 26,242,000 BCC directed Revenue Source: General Obligation Bond Referendum 26,242,000 Net $ 0 Libraries Requested Library Construction $ 5,514,000 and Book Collection FY93-97 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Library Impact Fee $ 3,652,000 Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue Fund) 1,862,000 5,514,000 Net $ 0 Government Duildinas Requested Construction of Facilities FY93-97 $ 0 500K r Q PALE 322 - 4 - [—�J F� C Parks and Recreation Requested Parks Construction & Land Acquisition FY93-97 LESS Existing Revenue Sources: Parks Impact Fees $ 17,282,600 Boating Improvement Program 850,000 Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue Fund) 4,815,400 Net C, C Drainage Requested Drainage & Water Management Projects FY93-97 IV, FINANCING PLAN SUMMARY Projects Projects County Arterial & $ 58,326,000 $ 50,967,000 Collector Roads -- State Roads Network 0 11,608,000 Water & Sewer System 15,530,000 0 Solid Waste 19,408,000 0 Emergency Medical Service 1,728,000 0 Jail Expansion 0 26,242,000 Libraries 5,514,000 0 Government Buildings 0 0 Parks and Recreation 22,948,000 0 Drainage & Water Management 0 0 Totals $123,454,000 $ 88,817,000 Revenue Sources FY93-97 Gas Taxes State Grants User Fees Ad Valorem Taxes (Capital Revenue Fund) Impact Fees MSTD (Livingston Road) Revenue Bonds (FY94) Commercial Paper Program G.O.B. Referendum (Jail) Totals $ 22,948,000 S 0 Total projects $102,293,000 11,608,000 15,530,000 19,408,000 1,728,000 26,242,000 5,514,000 0 22,948,000 $212,271,000 Existing Proposed Revenues $ 7,561,000 $ 0 $ 7,561,000 850,000 0 850,000 19,408,000 0 19,408,000 6,677,400 0 6,677,400 72,957,600 0 72,957,600 16,000,000 0 16,000,000 0 50,967,000 50,967,000 0 11,608,000 11,608,000 $123,454,000 88,817,000 $212,271,000 - 5 - 500K 050PAGE323 summary This proposed financing plan for the FY93-97 CIE of the Growth Management Plan is based on the application of revenues from nine (9) current and proposed sources to accomplish the $213M plan within the nine (9) policies outlined. It represents a prudent, achievable, and equitable approach to secure the revenues needed for a financially feasible CIE. The first priority of the Collier County Capital Improvement Program over the next five (5) years must be to complete projects in the Capital Improvement Element. Additionally, there are numerous capital projects of vital importance to the maintenance of high standards of service to Collier citizens which are under construction, planned, or yet to be developed that will need to be funded. A key component of this CIE Financing Plan, as iterated in Policy 02, is the imposition of impact fees at the highest level which is legally defensible to attain and maintain Level of Service Standards. Impact Fees currently in place will provide 34% of the funds to complete the projects in this plan. .50OW 058PAA,24 C APPENDIX G COLLIER COUNTY THIRD ANNUAL UPDATE i INVENTORY REPORT (AUIR) ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 500K 050 PAGE 325