Resolution 1993-157
" ,
I I , , . ..."
", . . i ' .:
i " i . 'L
APRIL 13. 1993
RESOLUTION 93-~7
^ RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING
FACILITY CONDITIONAL USE IN THE "E" ESTATES
ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.6.9
(ESSENTIAL SERVICES) OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in
Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida
Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoninfl and such business
regulations as are necessary for the protection of the
public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for
the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County,
among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission. being
the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the
area hereby affected, has held a pUblic hearing after notice
as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered
the advisability of Conditional Use per Section 2.6.9
(Essential Services) in an "E" zone for a multipurpose
training facility on the property hereinafter described, and
has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory
provision and arrangement has been made concerning all
applicable matters required by said regulations and in
accordance with SUbsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development
Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given
opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting
-
assembled and the Board having considered all matters
presented.
aDOK 000 PAGE 28
-1-
~
APRIL 13, 1993
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that:
The petition filed by Lowell Raines of Collier County
Facilities Management, representing Collier County Sheriff's
Office, with respect
to the property hereinafter described as:
Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by
reference herein
be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use per
Section 2.6.9 (Essential Services) of the "E" zoning district
for a mUltipurpose training facility in ?c~ordance with the
Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit tIC") and subject to the
following conditions:
j
J
f
.j
J
a.
The Master Plan be amended so that the forty (40)
foot berm on the south side of the property is
extended in an easterly direction to allow for a
continuous berm over the entire southern portion of
the property with the exception of a walkway from
the parking lot.
b.
The Current Planning Manager may approve minor
changes in the location, siting, or height of
buildings, structures, and improvements authorized
by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses
identified and approved within this conditional use
application, or major changes to the site plan
submitted as part of this application, shall
require the submittal of a new conditional use
application, and shall comply with all applicable
County ordinances in effect at the time of
submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development
Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County
Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102).
Petitioner shall utilize the southeast wetland as a
naturally vegetated retention area to meet
stormwater retention requirements unless otherwise
required by South Florida Water Management
District.
c.
j
I
f
d. Should the State or County require groundwater
monitoring for lead contamination at the time of
development order approvals, the petitioner shall
provide a copy of the monitoring plan to Project
Review Services prior to the issu~nce of said
development order.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded
in the minutes of this Board.
Commissioner
Constantine
offered the
foregoing Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by
000 PAGE 29
I
1
1
j
I
I
:1
8DOK
-2-
. . '. ' . I .' I" '
.' ',' { ,
.. ," ~, .
..-' .. ' . .
;._~
I
4
i
I
1
APRIL 13, 1993
Commissioner
Norri$l
and upon roll call, the
vote was:
AYES: Commissioner Constantine, Commissioner Norris, Commissioner
Volpe, Commissioner Hatthews, and Commissioner Saunders
NAYS:
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
Done this
13th
day of
April
, 1993.
A:r'TEST;:/J '1 f
.~GHT E.. B~OCK, CLERK
." ..~.
~ . ,? .;::
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
:~~A;Y'
T L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN
-1
,
!
'j
J
f
~..
00-93-1 RESOLUTION
nb/9253
8DOK 000 PAGE 30
-3-
._";i., ~--
<,---,\..- A_
I ~ . r
I ,1 I ,_ .
APRIL 13, 1993
,...... .
~~;~*,
'. . FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
C-Tl-q'-I
!
f.
I
r
!
l
J
The following facts are found:
2.6.9 (Essential
1. Section. Serivrp~) of the Land Development
Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect
the public interest and will not adversely affect other
property or Uses in the same district or neighborhood
because of: '
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and
Growth Management Plan:
Yes -k::. No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
~automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,
-traffic flow and control, and access in case of
fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes ~NO_
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to ~~I
noise, glare, economic o~ odor effects: ~I'~
No affect or ~Affect mitigated by ~
----- _____ Affect cannot be mitigated ,
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and
other property in the district:
Compatible u~ within district
Yes ~ No _
Based on the above findings, this conditional Use should,
with stipUlations, (copy a~~~ched) (should not) be '
rec0mmended for approval ~~~~ .
,DATE: 3-1/-7.3 MEMBER: k~
FINDING OF FACT MEMBE:R/md
Exhibit "A"
aDOK 000 PAGE 31
," ,g-\:, " " , , I
~ f' . '" '" ~l
APRIL 13. 1993
f
t
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
r.1I-91-1
1
f
f
l
The following facts are found:
2.6.9 (Essent ial
1.' Section . Seriv"...) , of the Land Development
Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect
the public interest and will not adversely affect other
property or uses in the same district or neighborhood
because of: .
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and
Growth Management Plan: \-
Yes _ No -4--
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
'automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,
'traffic flow and control, and access in case of
fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingrJ(ss , egress
Yes No_
c. Affects neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare, economic or odor effects:
No affect or Affect mitigated by
----- ~ ^ffec~not be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and
other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes _ No -X.:-
Based on the above findings, this ~~use should,
with stipUlations, (copy attached~ ~be .
recommended tor approval V\J OC2. ..-;) A.
DATE: .1}J\3/CJJ MEMBE '_~ ~
/
FINDING OF FACT MEMBER/md
&ODK 000 P~Gt 32
~..,! I . ~ ,
~ , ,
'- rt " I' .
'-f:- .'., 1'. I .
. . ,
. . . .
APRIL 13, 1993
"
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
r.rr-Q1-1
The following facts are found:
2.6.9 (Essential
1. Section S e r i v ('.. . ) of the Land Development
Code authorized the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect
the public interest and will not adversely affect other
property or uses in the same district or neighborhood
because of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and
Growth Management Plan;/,
Yes ~ No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
'.automoti ve and pedestrian safety and convenience,
'traffic flow and control, and access in case of
fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingres~& egress
Yes ~ No _
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare, economic or odor effects:
No affect or Affect mitigated by
----- ~ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and
other property in the district:
compatible~e within district
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this c~;~;nn~'~se 3k~~ld(
~ -'+h- _L1ifi~r,-Lh"L, (copy attached) should not be J:l
recommended for approval .
DATE: :},-/k-93 MEMBER-;"#lld,UlL{l t .~
FINDING OF FACT MEMBER/md
lOOK . 000 PAGE 34
APRIL 13, 1993
'\--:::-
. . I'" :~~: ,:::5::?::: ..... . .~.::.:.",::-,,:' t":.:", .:.::"
..,,~.. \ ~. ~:. -. .;..:.:...',-:~.::.-.:.. :,:,~.,:.'.:,'~,..:::_..-:~~:~,....:.::::,.~.:./.t...?:.:.~:~~'-:.":.~' ~..
-~,:{11i~~'j?:!T:,;,; .
"'"
;"... :~.
SECTION
ttOJeCf: !l>_....... 0_,,<.
,.u.cc.: ~ _--"?"y
26, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE: 26 EAST
COLUER, COUNTY, FlORIOA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'tho bst 150 toot ot 'tr..t .~ .... oil .t Tn.t '0, .....dlnq t. th.
plat ot Cold,n c.t, "t.t.., Unit o. .s re...dl"" In Plot Bo.k 7,
p.q. 2a. Publl. Re.ords ot Colli.. County, norld.. sltu.t. In
$,cUon 21, T.vnshlp 47 SOUth, ""'1'" ""st. colllor """nty,
TloJ;"id~.
COnta!nlnq '.77 "C:J;"t~. "or. or l~ss.
-1---0=5 6 S' 40' 50-E
TI60 ISO' I 1
I '
I :
: ,"An-L"",_
I 65 1 eON
I I ~
: g :
~ I
I. '" I
I' I
I I
f ILl I
b I
I ~ 677~IACRES
I.' '- I
I g I
I z I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
.. I I __ --'fir-
-ris-'- -----15-o'----T-------h.---.'4-5"ii?------ - ill
N6S'40'50-W . 603.21' ~
------ -~--70-TH---------A - i.i E:-------.-N-E-.-=I---- --.
THIS IS A SKETCH OF THE LEGAL OESCRIPTION. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
NOT TO SCALE.
't.u.u.l:D IT:
D:...utSP"ln.TATIOl'f n~,llC.tS onulC"
COUIQ. CUHTl COVo.rQWrr ctl"PLU
3JOl E. TMI..AI1t T.U.IL
.Alt:a. n. 3J"t
(II]) 774-1210
It:Qfl...a~_
l1c.u.u.o oS.. r,.tlc:.c , .
nora:UUKAL l.AJfQ ytlOl 121"
D.ln:....w__~.. ~. ~1
-.:
Exhibit na"
000 PlGt
38'
&OOK