Resolution 1985-249
~'appealed Development Order 85-3 to the Florida Land and Water 'I ,.
: .,,- : ',:-":r(J ",:.\,,~,(,
~djudieatory Comm1ee1on pursuant ~~ Section 380.07, Florida Statutes;""~~"Tt~~I~
" " '" J,.", . "';""''''';7H r~I\~~!~\,:?i7
liBERI!AS, the Depsrtment of COlllllunity Affairs and the developer for' J'.\
;, ,.., :' ;; ~;" j - ..
.;.
,-
i ;'
( : t 1 <~'_''':
I/HEREAS ,
November 26,
RESOLUTION a5--liL.
AMENDING DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85-3,
FOR LELY,! A, RESORT' COMMUNITY;
ADDING SECTION 4.C.3.b. TO ADD THE
SEGMENT SR-951 HENDERSON CREEK TO
US-41 TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMIT-
MENTS AND TO CLARIFY SERVICE. LEVEL
DETERMINATION; AMENDING SECTION
4.C.3.d. TO CLARIFY THE MONITORING
REPORT REQUIREMENTS; AMENDING SECTION
4.C.3.e. TO CLARIFY THE FAIR SHARE
DETERMINATION; AMENDING SECTION
4.C.3., ALTERNATIVES, PARAGRAPH a. TO
CLARIFY THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE USE OF
IMPACT FEES; AMENDING SECTION 4.C.3.,
OTHER ALTERNATIVES, PARAGRAPH b. TO
CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF OTHER
ALTERNATIVES FOR MlTIGATION OF TRAFFIC
IMPACTS; AMENDING SECTION 4.C.4.,
CONDITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR PROTECTION
OF RARE, ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND
SPECIAL CONCERN PLANT SPECIES AND TO
DEFINE THE AGENCIES TO BE NOTIFIED OF
THE SURVEY AND IDENTIFICATION OF SUCH
SPECIES; ADDING SECTION 12 TO MAKE THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR
THE LOCAL OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE FOR
ASSURING COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOP-
MENT ORDER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
~ h"!"
. .
;
,.};..;,,,q~.q )c ,
". i, ~
of 'Countr'Comin1Se1oners approved on May 21, 1985
"
, >,:;"i.';_,
known as Lely, A Resort Community; and
,;,,",'''-, ",.-,- -, ,'- '. ..'
on July 26, 1985,. the Depsrtment of Comun1ty Affairs 'I'
~;
i-'~~'"
';'<f~1+:~'
, ,.;;.,..
~'~. ~'"
.'):;'~Ji~ .
'le"
:-,<-,';'."
Lely, A Re.ortCommun1ty hsv. agread on rsvised lsngusge to resolva
,
,
'.;
1. thoall.item.. under appeal; and .:, :,)'1,
. ' I/HEREAS, the Board of County C0IIIIl1se1oners mu.t spprovs the ~evis~d , c;,it~'J;
"."oj. v;",q pl. ,'^'!~:~;~;'
lsngusge in an omended Development, Order. , '",.' , ", ,"', "", f."?/it~l{
.... HOlI, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Bosrd of County COlllllise1oner.;/?",'i\,.!Il~"
[' 'of Collier County, FIorida, that Davelop~ent Order 85-3 ahsll'b~" ," ''', ..ij!/[;;:
-- -~.. .~~ - '.- '.- .,~",,,,">~.-,-~.., -.~... ~-'-:"".- -,- __',_ _u,._.,,~~.~~,...'~
MlliK/IIUa'.!enaed"88"f0l1owll . ' . I'" . "
10il., ~~J.~.. w;<''''il>Uea P.EAIU'O.. O~. fttrl' 1'$.t'.I\.;,
!."JJ;~'tt.,~~,. ~",i/t. t ,~IIF \J''' if~;'iL~~tft"..t",~~.~~"~'t~~~tAJI!i~;\</_ ;':I'~~:
I~~;<t:~~ " " , "~~l'" , ' ." f.._"
,....~f :,~~:7 . ,< >;: ./ ,;, '_~ . ,
. ,:a!' . ':."':~J!;>:I.t'~'^~..,.sl~Y ~ ;.~;~ ~(,"i~ ,~,
. '-:~~j'H~' "
'~t':, ':~~tl,' ,
Word. add~: &r8 underlined; 'i;~,$iji1t~k-thPe...1t &r8 delet.d"i.W""
...
! 1 '; .~
";/~;'t .~
~:-1~~>,1>:~:
8. SR 951 from Henderson Creek to US-41.
-
~
November 26, 1985.,
SECTION ONE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85-3, SECTION 4.C.3.b SHALL BE AMENDED .
AS FOLLOWS,
I
b. At the time that any porti~n of the following roadwayo
1. found to exceed level-of-service lie" (by the Collier County
Enlineerina Department or other appropriate county department
or FDOT), the appIieont ahall become obligated to pay a
proportionate share of the cost of eonstruetinR two additional
lanes (but not r~ght-of-vay) for the segment exceeding
eapsdty,
1. US 41 from Randeraon Craek to CR 951
2. US 41 from CR 951 to Lely N/S Arterial
3. US 41 from Lelr N/S,Arterial to CR 864
4. US 41 from 864 to CR 31
5. CR 951 from US 41 to Lely E/W Arterial
6. CR 951 from Laly E/W Arterial to CR 864
7. CR 951 from CR 864 to SR 84
each hase of deveIo ment for 8n road Be cot or intersection.
Thi8 ahare ahall b. determined durinx final plat approval of
listed above, which will be operating below ey-e~e-pereeftt8se
ef-t!lte level of service "c" e8P8eity-ef-the-hpreyed_reacf-eepeftf!
eefttriD~ted-e~h.-pre~eetT on an average daily basis at
build out of thst phsse. The spplieant's fsir share ohall be
. , ~~
}:i.:-:;
.':'7#:"
'. ~.,.,.
.:;'li~~f
,.!,~..
'~,~' ,r
;,",.;,~,
- '}~:'l
based on ae~.i-.rl!lffie-eeaftte-l!Ie-eh~ime-ie.ei-ef-eerviee
~Gll-i8-efteeededT the projections of the project traffic's
ercenta e of total traffic on the road se ent/intersection
~
inc1udin
buiIdout
not ineluda impsets generated by the Ediaon College, Cultural
Center, or Elementary School faCilities,
to fund their propOrtionate. share.
;ne-eoe~ne~~ee-deeermifteay-ae-ene-eime-ef-eemmefteemeftt-ef
eeftstrHetieftT-~the-eseftey-mekifts-the-impreY..eftt.-eftd-eheii
ee-...ed-en-enae-<<lene7Le.everase-eee.e-fer_ene-e..e-e". .
icprevemefte.Y-er-&y-eet~al-eeft..ruee~eft-ee.t.Y-~E_eva'~eeieT
Pe,.eftt-ei-the-e"iiesft~e-,Ye,eYtieftete-eheYe-she~e-dae
-pen-eemmene..efte-eE-eefte'rve.~eft-ef-tft.-ree4wa'_im,reVeaefteT
Words underlined are added; words etruek-~b~~~~ft are deleted.
n_..
'DDK 09hGt i(
, "
~},~;:,;~~.f-
-;. (t;":i>j~.
. ,
......,.~.~:J;"_'"'-~:. ,
?:,~,<J..
"",'.,i';--Jr'
::"i:r}L4~ "
~!t.~l~!:~~
HovembR, 26, 1985
At final plat approval of the fifth (5th) or last phase of
develo ent the develo er'. fair share for this hase shall
address impacts to regional roadways/intersections which Bre
ro ected to be 0 erst!n below level of service Iten on an
avers e dail basis and on which TO eet traffic will amount
to (IO) ten percent or more of the level of se.rvice lie"
service volume on the road. Pro1ections of background and
project traffic generated by the fifth (5th) or finsl phase
shall be computed, reviewed and approved by Collier County at
final plat approval of the fifth (5th) or final phase and
shall include projections for three (3) years past the
ex ected build-out of that hase. The develo er's fair share
for the fifth (5th) or finel phase shall be based 'on the
ro eetian of the ro eet traffic's ercenta e of the total
traffic on the road at the end of the third (3rd) year fOllOWing
the ex ected build-out of that hase for 1m rovements needed to
maintain level of service "e" on an average daily basis on
regional roadways/intersections.
; I
Once the applicant'. percenta~e fair share is determined and
the Count and the FDOT have estimated the construction coat
for the needed improvement, which estimate shall be dete~ined
within thirt (30 da a of a licant's re uest, the a licant
shall rovide assurance of abilit to a their fair share b
acce table to the entit res onaible for
i rovin the road se ent/intersection. Such securit ma
take the form of a letter of credit, escrow account, bond,
mort a e and romi8so
note, or some other "Similar securit n
acce table to DCA. The actual cost of the needed 1m rovement(s)
and the applicant's share of the cost shall be determined At
the time of lett!nR of contracts for construction of the
needed improvement by the agency making the improvement(s).
Fa ent of the a licantr. fair share shall be due u on the
determination of the actual cost of construction of the
roadway improvement. Said costs shall be limited to
construction costs and shall not include riRht-of~ay costs.
,":'-/,:'"
>',(;( tj, t
I'.
Vorde added ar. underlined:
-
verda e~P6ek-~"r.~s"
~-
are deleted
-
'-'-"0.
':-,'
:Ft:t;
,'ilI;~f
'~~.,
".,
'.> ..'.-
. v :~t,
'W'
~~'"
~.
:,'tc'
".!~k' .
Novem l:er 26; '1985
A~-~he-s..e-~ime~~.th~;app~ieant ,becomes oblig~~ed to a
proportional ~haro, pa~ent, Collier County pr FDOT,ahall
eOlllllit ,toaddingtwo,larles to tho rosd segment axeeeding
,;,capac1ty. "'":"l.!';;;~"'-U~_f""";"'_ ,. ,.
'i,',:J
.,........,."..
SECTION 2:, DEVELOPllENT,ORDER.85,~,3 SECTION 4.C.3.d. SHALL BE"AMENDED TO
READ AS FOLLOl/S:
'.
"
d. GO"it.eft'-*o-eefte~~ee-the-preper.iena~_eftere_*-preve.eft~.
o~tl*fted-ift-reecmmeftdat~efte-&-eftd-e-aheve_ehall_ee-aede_et_the
eime~ha~eed-aermefttfifttereeetieft-ie-Eebftd_ee-eHeeed_L9&-
IlGII,.
The first monitoring report shall be submitted within 180
day. of the time of the iSBuance of the firat certificate
o! occupancy for Le11. This report ahall contain ' traffic
Counts taken on a weekday durinR peak BeaSon at the access
point. to the site and all general analyses of tha, project'.
ori&ins and destinations for that given year including turning
movements to tho intersections of US 41 and CRlsR 951. ~
addition beR1nn1ng with the year that phase II receives
final plat approval, the report shall conta!n exist!nR
traffic counts for the road se~ents/inter8ections listed in
paragraph b. and c. above except that Counts shall
FOLLOl/S :
SECTIOII 3. DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85-3 SECTION 4.C.3.e. SHALL BE AMENDED AS
not be required on SR-951 once road Widening is commenced.
U~~.f_ _ ~_'
:~.;.' ,:;-;~~J~_
i:<;~~m
!i;tr{~(~~~i
.~'~~:~,::'W;
III and eseh subsequent ,phase, the applicant shsll submit i~~;.;;~
::=::.=:::==:;~~.
d.,enent-iftc-eo-4:b:eft~n-eppr.,.,ed-Pieftll4:fts-pr"lt'eatt1e-fttftd :_;'_~~ ~~~;;-,~_
-'lS\t"I,-..~.'
' \?~~~!"#it~tJt':
'~l?"'tf;~'i
-.? D;:i .i'~:i~-'~
:~,I
',..,
e.
Prior to finsl plst spproval BeEere-~he-~ft~~~e~~eft of Phase
re~ttired-ftt.ttre-t'.,edwaY-4m~re.,emeft~eTWhich shall include
deterMinations of the applicant's percentage fair share
~- .......
through the expected build-out of the phase being considered
for approval, and the assurances provided by the developer
of ability to pay the fair share of any transportation
improvements as required by Section 4.C.3.b. of the
Development Order. The report ,shall also update the
MDK 09l PA's. 15
f"
,:,;;:~~,t
<~~f
~;~ ,:.:.~..fI
:<:/l~t
',''1''
"~'~:i';?.J!
, ~- '-'",,,.1_ .:.t.~tfA~
, ~';:..,;,
..~...
I""
'"."..,',',",.,
"",',-,
i" ,~{_",
, ....
J ''\.';.
~:"IOOK 091pl!;{ 16
(i
)'
, ,
,,;tt
.'
,";i,Ol r N~vembe:r, 26",1985
~ j;' t
"'.J.:,
"'_I"'"
'-~;fr~;
applicant ',a .ueeoo. in diverting arterial traffic ,from other
'I j.. . ,'.. .' . .. .. .. .. ',' '" ~!. .
roedway. outaide Lely to, the rosdways within ths DRI thus
lessening the need for 1~provement8 on non-DR~ roadways.;,;
Appro,.e~......ppro,.ehi."-eoft<li.iOftS_iE_ft.e<l.<l.......E-to""'fte".,,,
.. '. ,,'. "'-'j
p"sse-eE-~iY-Viii-ee-e.,eft<left~pon-res~i.e-eE-to"is-s~rvey-
1flf~
fi':',
I"'i:::(:"~ "..,
!,~.!.
,~ "5t:f!
! ~~,
:~~'t "'
":")' ..
~~::.
l",,'
,
::.Jt:::;
'~""
n'~'-'
1 "
,It,-.
,r~ .
~<.
aftd-efte-reYiew-eftd-re~eftdetiefta-previded_Dr_~he-eDOYe-
re~erefteed-e~eneie8TWith1n 60 days of submittal of the
report required by this section. the applicant and the
above-referenced agencies may recommend additions to or
deletions from roadways listed in Section 4.C.3.b. of this
Development Order, based on the traffic study required by
this section. Additions! road seRments or intersections
shall be added if the traffic study indicates the 'project
level of service "eft service volume on a road or intersection
traffic will amount to ten (10) percent or more of tbe
o era tin below level of service "eft on an avera e dail basis
at buildout of that phase. Any amendments to the listed
roadways shall be based on the results of the traffic study
lfcant and Collier Count rior to
initiation of Phase III and each subsequent phase. Collier
County shall givs DCA and the Southwest Florids Regional
Planning Council notice of any amendment to the list of
roadways and notice of no action if additions were recom-
The DCA snd the Southwest Florids Regionsl Planning
mended by the agencies and not accepted by the County.
'T,'
Council shall have the Ti~ht to appeal pursuant to Section
380.07. Florida Statutes if their recommendations are not
accepted bv the county.
SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT ORDER S5-3 SECTION 4.C.3 ALTERNATIVES PARAGRAPH;".,
a. SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ AS ,FOLLOWS I
a. Impact Fees/Assessments/and Credits
if-Ge~~~er-Ge~ney-or-aft7-~ener-appreprieee-a~eee~~~
loY.rnmefte-a~epee-aft-'mp.e.-feey-e..e.eaefte~r
bPeeett-otfte~,~.JI:.:'7'ift~f:~I--eeneftf:"tt-W~f:e<J:~ftet'.~I~',r:i,~
*fte-.reftttPer.ee~Oft-e.p~e~i-impreyeaeft~e-e~.!ift~~e~~
:~(') '-"'.\
....
e.-a-reei'iefte~f-elt~~~fttl..T"eltilt_fee_er_.ttlteltn..~e,: r. ')
')t:~'ir",l;,
}
:::'~': %:,~",;.:,:~,: .. f',:;il
wordS8~~ek-~ftPe~th are deleted
-
-
nFoydS added are underlined;
, !_~
, -;':;<,
,'-'-\~:~:~&
"';;~!
':::;':'~~:~
,'.. .--",
/;t~
",:;"","l,M,
. -', '/,:f
, ",,"
~;;)<j1~~
':,I!:::':;~!-:~~
i, :;,~, ~ff~:4,
, :.:M'.;;;.fl
~ --~r;_~4if~
implicit eomitmtnts for construction from local and &tate _ "/"ilif'
agencies. In 80me esses, the improvements msy not result ,eve~ ,.~_
with applicant commitments because of lack of eommitme~t ~y :frl~ I
. ,- ~r,'''I..;t;;i'tP~~.
atate agencies. Therefore, Collier County 1. allowed . '",
to provide alternatives to the above conditions when ~~~~ '
.':}~,'m~
,:"l :;'>4::
..
....
_I
November 26, 19S5
.ft8~~ee-.we.'~ta'.~ PaYment ot Collier County or any other
appropriate agency or government'. impact fee and/or asse88-
ment, which payment will be used to fund any of the trans-
portatlon improvements specified in the Development Order or
PUD, Ihall be credited toward the fair share payments required
by this Development Order and/or PUD for the types of improve-
ments
and/or state addresaed b said im act
ree and/or assessment. If an adopted Impact Fee/Assessment
does not addresB state roadways impacted by the development,
ro ortionate share a ents shall be made for such roadwa s,
regardless of tht impact fee/assessment contributions a
Payments alreadyaede by tha applicant for these improvements
shall b. credited toward the overall fees Imposed~on the
project. Proportional credit fot the construction of the major
internal roadwsy. within the project .hsll also ba givtn
towards the applicant's proportional share funding outlined
above ba.ed:oo the percentage of non-DRI traffic utilizing
8uch road. a. dsttrmined by required traffic monitoring,
"
studi.s.
. <'\';r',. ''f'
" ~ ," ,I r
SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ,85-3, SECTION 4.C.3 OTHER ALTERNATIVES,
PARAGRAPH b. SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOIIS,
b.
Other Alternative.:
It i. understood that the specific conditions listed above
require commitments for payment fram the developer and..
the alternativ.. adequately mitigate or offset the pro1ect's
regional road impacts on road segments/intersections
identified in paraRraphs a~ And ba above. and/or reduces
the project'. total traffic to less than ten (10) percent of
the level of service "Cn service volume of these road
segments/intersections, Should this alternative be pursued.
Collier County 1s reque.ted to solicit Council review of the
lOOK 091 PAGE 17
Words added are underlined; words et~ek-th~e~tft are deleted
'."'~
,
;'t',,;,;..'t';$t.:"''''''''ln;/ I~O:, '\,;
,1I~vemher 26, J985
[I'll
to'~~ending
09h?: 18
alternatives prior
the Development Order
~ei",-adope.dy to reflect the chanRe. Said amended
Development Order shall be subject to the appeal provisions
in Section 380.07, Florida Statues, and to the procedural
requirements in Subsection 380.06 (19)-(f) (6), Florida
Statutes. ;
SECTION S. DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85-3 SECTION 4.C.4, SHALL BE
~~l;' ~
Il\~:'"
~ "".
','\
,,-
,.'
, "
, ..'o:t;*<':'4
, !/' ,,:J.,
'r"~-~" ~
~1:\k;;.
r.:.t~~\'
AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:,;, ','
4. Vegetstion and Wildlife:
Several rare, endanaered, threatened and special concern
wildlife speci.. occur ~r potentially occur on site. A clan
of Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers have utilized the site for
br.eding and nestina purposes recently in the past and could
~.;;/_~:
~~" "
?(",'
.'->.' .
i~.[;.'.. :~
.~i.'.'.: ,
i'S "
I"
..,,'.'
.til1 exist on the .ite.
Conditions:
The applicant shall implement detailed 8ite inspection for
rare, endangered, threatened and special concern wildlife
and plant specie_, with special attention to the Red-Cockaded
Woodpecker, for each phase proposed for final plat approval.
The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and DCA may
provide the applicant with suggested methodology and in-
formation on plant and animal species to be inventoried. The
applicant shall notify the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission and DCA of the results of the survey and the
methodOloRV used prior to any development within that phsse.
Should the survey.indicate the presence of ~he8e rare,
endenRered, threatened and special concern species ~ be-fe~ftd,
tha applicant shsll ftetil,-the spprepriete e,efteiea-eft'-shs~
undertake appropriate protection measures? ~ ~ ;ne..
measure. shall be approved by efte-epp.ep.ia~e-alefteYi~e.~
these sgeneies within thirty (30) dsys of submittal by
the applicant and prior to final plat approval. ~
any 8ite development.
1 ,:;' ~ ~. ,i d,
-.... '-.-'-_..,.".....
" . :;, :'1 I ~;;;, );{,....;
..,:
;) l-'~
Word. added,are underlined..;vords.Jte:rttek-tftretlslt ara del.ted.~';j~~.
.
".",,,'
~.
I:':'I!':~.'..
. ~';f:"
;"~;//
~~~'
SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT ORDER b5-3 SHALL BE AMENDED BY ADDIIIG SECTION 12
None
.!J'':.
; .;~ ." (', J'1 '.;
lIovember 26, 1985
", "':::'I.~,i
""'''''"'''8'.
' . ')>'~V:~;'iJ:~
"~
TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 12:
The Collier County Community Development Administrator .,
shall be the local official responsible for assurinR
compliance with this Development Order.
"
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED thst this resolution be recorded in the
minute. of this Board.
~',; l,.f ;;;J~. '.' )COMMISSIONERv~~l/'fi ! '
:, J.:, I J ; ~'" ", t: "j I ... """
. . '. . . moved its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
\.; ~ ! ~'l:t .'i', ,,'.' . 'j '. , . ...", . ,. ' '. " '" . ,
... ,roll call.- the vote va.: l i II
offered the foregoing resolution and
: J."" '''~ t 'r ;'-;u12
r..nnAn-fgl1t-
jand upon _~.
.~" Yo
c:~~,jAyis':: r"':C~i~sioners" vO~8,;';G~o~~1~~t:
" \,!! i,..,. : ~" ~
Hasse, Holland and Pis tor
,I
"~it;
IIAYES: .. lIone
"
',' r: ,/."_
.. ;" '.', . ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: None'
'.,'
';j r
:AI;j;
,';;(;-):.
, ABSTENTION:
J.::',}"
i.'i',
'j',.;",!,,;
r
','1 i '. ~
"'I
i;r;',
Done this
26th
dsy of,
NnUPmhp,..
1985 ".
;''; I' J I) ,
....c.
i ! ,,' \ ,~ i
::"'1
i'.;f I . ~ iJ
('/~J r "J.! I. J t';
,;
~:;~n,~jlJ~) ~-';.\" ",
,..; (;-f..,. :)b~;, ;, '~;; ; ~
:;'0 '~,[j\t ~1;
;~ I' !..,;,,;,
hdHqJJi'
, U ! ',i ~! f~:
~.:,J:""'.,;J;', \.t~q
-'l;'J.f lrJE,li"JJ
:'."j
~'Ol,
t . '" .II ~.:.
..,';' · '''~::~!~~'o'\~i~;~;, :'f'
1.:1n 0' ""'''1('1',)',
'~". "". .r '.oj\.(
:iC ~l ~";~:O\~';,..;
(;,j "'., '.' r:'.::::~~;,'~ ~:-:"l
'\
f:'
.'" ; .' r~
~, ;, r..; ,- ' I , , i
AND Lfuit: SUFFICIENCY:
, ~.
,_,;1.:
,:" ~ ~ :.~ ;,' :: i':,.; i .
'-:~, t
j'\
.- i- ;>1,';'_0;.1:0;..
".,;,Lv i.1"~
tf_, r<;..",;>.'.....i" '.,-i. .~:;,j (J.':~&,
';1
iLif
J.-t..' "'..'",
.~',. 1 ~ .~'~;' ,,~:\i
in' t.'... /~"i~.J" cJ\j':
1.
,1'- J -i J 4';) ...
:JfibLO/,-,_"
I. ',~!l':;;' ( c' .J-i: .
(:/)\:.'.,,::,;.;!.( ,: /(.1'".; ;!,..h,.ij:. 'iI~&jftq"1tt-",fr<
..~----...'-~
VD/.::20P-'!. ,r,v!!lr:
Y!,t>CIC'1LICM l:..~
~H::UQrn,LJOJ1 {','"
....--... .-. '.'~'" ....__.;.~..,~......,.,'-
H tlfY;)l),LSU
'J;<' -.'.:H~ }";~.2 ~.ihH)l",C Gi.Cr1.: 'I"~:;'
;; :,~C< V_;);liif!:~'\ 1 He l.vtrog-tL-YJ1':'1q:
I:',
if;,:
~ \ .'1
1,)'
:1:
lOOK 091PAc,[ 19
Worde added are underlined; words .trHek-ehre~ch are deletea
Lely DO Reaolution '