Loading...
Agenda 12/04/2007 GMPBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S SPECIAL MEETING GMP AGENDA DECEMBER 4, 2007 A AGENDA December 4, 2007 9:00 a.m. School Concurrency Amendment Transmittal Hearing 2005 Cycle Amendments Adoption Hearing Jim Coletta, Chairman District 5 Tom Henning, Vice Chairman, District 3 Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1 Frank Halas, Commissioner, District 2 Fred W. Coyle, Commissioner District 4 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. December 4, 2007 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. 2007 Growth Management Plan Amendment Transmittal Hearing: A. Petition: CPSP- 2007 -7. Petition creating a new Public School Facilities Element with support document, and amending the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Growth Management Plan to establish a public school concurrency program. This is a companion item to the School Concurrency Inter - local Agreement between the Collier County District School Board and Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the cities of Marco Island, Everglades and Naples. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] 3. 2005 Cycle Growth Management Plan Amendments Adoption Hearing: A. CP- 2005 -2, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to expand "Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center', to allow medical/ medical related uses and professional office uses, for property located at the Southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 1st Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7± acres. [Coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] B. CP- 2005 -6, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3± acres. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] C. CP- 2005 -9, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 70,000 square feet of lower order retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] 2 December 4, 2007 D. CP- 2005 -13, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non - church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, offering 150 of up to 296 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] E. CPSP- 2005 -14, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Map Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 20 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 13 and 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of +283 acres total. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] F. CPSP - 2005 -15, Petition requesting an amendment to the Transportation Element (TE), to add new Policies 3.5 and 3.6, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. G. [Coordinator: Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Planning Director] H. CPSP - 2005 -16, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map series map titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] CP- 2006 -4, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan G( GAMP), to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria provision, to allow a church as a special exception to locational criteria, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and ±300' east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 2.6± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] 4. Adjourn INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774 -8383. 3 December 4, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION CPSP- 2007 -7, School Concurrency Growth Management Plan amendments — Capital Improvement and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements, new Public School Facilities Element and support document — and Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Interlocal Agreement (Transmittal Hearing) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review amendments to the Capital Improvement and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements, a new Public School Facilities Element and support document, and an Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency (ILA) to implement school concurrency, and to consider approving these amendments and ILA for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. CONSIDERATIONS: The 2005 Florida Legislature, in Senate Bill 360, enacted legislation amending Sections 163.3180 and 163.3177, F.S., requiring the implementation of public school concurrency throughout the state of Florida. Program implementation will require coordinated planning among the County, the three municipalities, and the District School Board, the result of which will be a collaborative and financially feasible process to ensure that adequate school capacity is available at the time of residential impact. Pursuant to State requirements, Collier County must adopt a school concurrency program that is internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan no later than March 1, 2008. Thereafter, the County will be required to incorporate the adopted Growth Management Plan amendments (GMPAs) into its Land Development Code, within one year from the effective date of the School Concurrency GMPAs. The general requirements for school concurrency are provided below. (Please refer to the CCPC Staff Report, included in the binder of materials, for a more detailed list of statutory requirements.) Interlocal Agreement (ILA) — Local governments and the School District are required to update their existing ILAs, consistent with Sections 163.31777 (2) and 163.3180 (13)(g), F.S. The ILA assures a uniform concurrency system throughout the District and serves as a guide for the development of the Public School Facilities Element. The ILA requires consensus by the District School Board and local governments on: a level of service standards (LOSS); concurrency service areas (CSAs); maximum utilization of capacity; options for proportionate share mitigation; adoption of the School District's financially feasible five -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and implementation and amendment procedures. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY TRANSMITTAL BCC December 4, 2007 Level of Service Standard (LOSS) Florida Statutes: a. Require the application of the LOSS districtwide to all schools of the same type b. Allow the use of a different LOSS for each school type c. Require that the LOSS be incorporated into the local government's CIE d. Allow school districts and local governments to use a tiered LOSS to allow time to achieve an adequate and desirable LOSS School District's proposal: The School District has proposed a districtwide LOSS of 95 % of the permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for elementary and middle schools, and 100% of permanent FISH capacity for high schools. Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) Florida Statutes: a. Allow for the adoption of a districtwide CSA b. Require less than districtwide CSAs be established within 5 years of adoption of school concurrency School District's proposal: The School District has proposed the adoption of less than districtwide CSAs; 15 elementary, 8 middle, and 8 high school CSAs. Proportionate Share Mitigation Florida Statutes: a. Require the developer to execute a legally binding development agreement with the local government and the school district b. Require that the mitigation be proportionate to the demand from the development c. Allow various mitigation options, such as, but not limited to, the payment for construction or land acquisition, contribution of land, and actual facility construction d. Require that the developer mitigation be directed by the School Board to a school capacity improvement identified in the District's five -year work plan that satisfies the impacts created by the residential development e. Require the mitigation amount be credited toward impact fees Availability Standard Florida Statutes: a. Require school concurrency be applied to residential projects only b. Require concurrency be applied at time of site plan, final plat approval, or functional equivalent, for a development or a phase of development c. Require capacity be in place or under construction within the first three years of the District's CIP 2 d. A developer may satisfy school concurrency by mitigating impacts proportionate to demand • Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) — Local governments are required to adopt Public School Facilities Elements that are consistent with each other and comply with Section 163.3177 (12), F.S., and Rule 9J- 5.025, F.A.C. The PSFE shall ensure that the public school concurrency program is based on relevant data and analysis and that consistent goals, objectives and policies are adopted. The PSFE must also ensure adequate school capacity for the five -year and long term planning periods; address the correction of existing deficiencies; address procedures for school siting; coordinate school siting with residential development; and ensure provision of necessary supporting infrastructure. • Capital Improvement Element (CIE) - Local governments are required to adopt amendments to their CIEs that are consistent with Section 163.3177, F.S., and Rule 9J- 5.016, FAC. Local governments are required to incorporate the District's financially feasible public school capital facilities program and LOSS into their CIEs. • Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) — Local governments are required to adopt amendments to their ICES that are consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3177 (6) (h) 1 -2, F.S. The Element must provide for the coordination of plans with the School District, and include joint processes for school siting and population - projections. FISCAL IMPACT: The only fiscal impact to Collier County at this time are the costs associated with document processing, review and advertisement, since final action is not being taken by the Board at this hearing. If approved for Transmittal, these documents will subsequently be considered for adoption at hearings to be held in 2008. Thereafter, land development regulations will be required for the School Concurrency Program implementation. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval and transmittal of these documents by the Board of County Commissioners to the Florida Department of Community Affairs will commence the Department's sixty (60) day review process. This will be followed by the Department's Objection, Recommendations and Comments Report, then final Adoption hearings by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners, to be held in 2008. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Executive Summary has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office. The Florida Legislature mandated that every County within Florida, with some exceptions, adopt school concurrency management programs pursuant to Florida Statutes. The required amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Interlocal Agreement, and new Public School Facilities Element and support document, are authorized by, and subject to the provisions established within, Chapters 163 and 1013, Florida Statutes. 3 However, the legal staffs of the School District and County have differing interpretations on various provisions contained within Chapters 163 and 1013, F.S., dealing with the question of whether or not the District must adhere to the County's land development regulations and Comprehensive Plan for site plan review, and the need to identify whether the County or the School Board will be required to provide transportation and infrastructure improvements to support schools identified for construction in the School District's Capital Improvement Plan on road segments not within the County's 5 -year Capital Improvement Element. Senior management from the School District and County have reached consensus on how to address these issues, as outlined below. RECOMMENDATION: The Resolution Exhibits reflect the Collier County Planning Commission's recommendations, and subsequent staff changes made to the CIE for internal consistency. The School District and County staffs' recommendations are the same as the CCPC, except as set forth below and possibly staff's subsequent CIE changes. In addition to the Resolution Exhibits and the recommendations below, staff has attached to the Executive Summary a complete list of the CCPC's recommendations for each document, including the "action" taken by staff on each item and staffs subsequent changes to the CIE. A. Document: Interlocal Agreement (ILA) (1) ILA Section 12.3 b. Issue Explanation: Due to differing interpretations of certain statutory provisions contained within Chapters 163 and 1013, F.S., upper management from the School District and County agreed to defer discussions on the School Board Review (SBR) ILA until a later date, and agreed to the underlined text identified under the County staff recommendation below, for incorporation into the School Concurrency ILA. However, the CCPC in its review of the ILA, and in consultation with the County Attorney's Office, recommended alternative text requiring that, in the absence of an SBR ILA Agreement, the School District shall be subject to the County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. County Staff Recommendation Expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement Between the County and the School District. "The County and the School District agree that prior to the expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement, they will negotiate in good faith and use their best efforts to develop another SBR Interlocal Agreement, to be entered into pursuant to Section 1013.33 (14), F.S. Alternatively, if (i) the County and the School District are unable to agree on another SBR Interlocal Agreement, (ii) the SBR Interlocal Agreement expires, and (iii) the County and the School District disagree over the review of a school site plan, then the County and the School District hereby agree that the School District shall file an action in the Circuit Court of Collier County seeking a declaratory judgment to resolve the dispute." School District's Recommendation The School District's recommendation is the same as County staff's recommendation above. F1 CCPC Recommendation At the November 1, 2007 CCPC meeting, the definition of the term "development" was referenced by the County Attorney's Office where it was stated that the law does not exempt schools from the definition of that term, pursuant to Section 380.04, F.S. The CCPC, in reliance of the Assistant County Attorney's interpretation of the above statutory provision, recommended the underlined text below for inclusion into the ILA. Expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement Between the County and the School District. "The County and the School District agree that prior to the expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement, they will negotiate in good faith and use their best efforts to develop another SBR Interlocal Agreement, to be entered into pursuant to Section 1013.33 (14), F.S. In the absence of an SBR Interlocal Agreement, the School District shall be subject to the Count's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code, as amended, for site development plan review, subject to the exceptions of the Florida Statutes." (2) ILA Section 13.8 (a) Issue Explanation: Section 163.3180 (13)(d) 1., F.S., requires local governments to amend their CIEs to include provisions which set forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities plan that demonstrates the adopted LOSS will be achieved and maintained. The School District staff has provided a public school capital facilities plan to County staff, which appears to demonstrate that the proposed LOSS will be achieved and maintained as required by F.S. However, the School District's CIP, as proposed, includes the opening of Combo School EEE in year 2012 — within the County's Five -Year planning period. The needed improvements for School EEE are not presently scheduled in the County's Five -Year CIE. Senior management from the School District and County, in consultation with their legal staffs, agreed to the text identified under the County staff recommendation below, for incorporation into the School Concurrency ILA. However, the CCPC recommended adding text to this section of the ILA to preclude the School District from obligating the County to construct public facilities to accommodate schools where infrastructure is not readily available or planned within the County's five -year capital plan. County Staff Recommendation County staff recommends adopting the District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element by reference, pursuant to the agreement between the senior management of the County and School District, and as set forth in the ILA provision below. However, staff should acknowledge to the Department of Community Affairs that the incorporation of the District's CIP into the County's CIE may cause the County's Comprehensive Plan to be internally inconsistent. Adoption and Amendment of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) "An annual update or any amendment to the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan 5 shall be transmitted to the Local Government for review and comment no less than 60 days prior to adoption by the School Board. The County and Cities shall adopt by reference the School District's annually updated financially feasible Capital Improvement Plan, specifically the "Summary of Capital Improvement Program" and the "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Tables from the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their Comprehensive Plans. The annual update to the "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Tables from the School District's annually adopted financially feasible Five -year Capital Improvement Plan shall be adopted by reference each year by the Local Governments...." School District's Recommendation The School District recommends the County adopt the District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan into its CIE by reference. CCPC Recommendation The CCPC recommended adopting the District's Capital Improvement Plan into the County's Capital Improvement Element by reference, provided additional text was added to the ILA provision to ensure that the CIE remains financial feasibility, as provided below. Adoption and Amendment of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) "An annual update or any amendment to the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan shall be transmitted to the Local Government for review and comment no less than 60 days prior to adoption by the School Board. The County and Cities shall adopt by reference the School District's annually updated financially feasible Capital Improvement Plan, specifically the "Summary of Capital Improvement Program" and the "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Tables from the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Improvement Element of their Comprehensive Plans. The annual update to the "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Tables from the School District's annually adopted financially feasible Five -year Capital Improvement Plan shall be adopted by reference each year by the Local Governments provided such adoption does not affect the Local Governments' ability to maintain a financially feasible CIE for the current five - year planning period...." C B. Document: Capital Improvement Element (CIE) (1) School District's Five -Year Capital Plan — adopted by reference Issue Explanation: The School District's Capital Improvement Plan contains two schools — "EEE" and "O "- which are scheduled to open in year 2012. The two schools would require infrastructure improvements that are not scheduled in the County's CIE. The adoption of the District's CIP, with the referenced schools, may cause the County's Growth Management Plan to be internally inconsistent. To resolve any potential inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the District could remove schools "EEE" and "O" from its CIP or recognize that the District is responsible for any and all improvements and in doing so enter into an interlocal agreement/developer contribution agreement with the County to pay for the infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate the proposed schools. County Staff Recommendation Pursuant to the agreement between the senior management of the County and School District, staff recommends adopting the District's Capital Improvement Plan into the County's CIE by reference, acknowledging to the Department of Community Affairs that the County's Comprehensive Plan may be internally inconsistent. School District's Recommendation District staff recommends removing School "O" from, and retaining School "EEE" in, its CIP. The School Board approved the removal of School "O" from the District Work Plan at their November 15, 2007 meeting. CCPC Recommendation At the CCPC hearing, the District staff informed the Planning Commission that School "EEE" would remain in the District's CIP and School "O" would be removed. District staff emphasized that construction dollars for School "EEE" are allocated in year 2009/2010 of their CIP (County's 3`d year) and the school's opening would not occur until the District's 60' year - 2012 (County's 5"' year). The CCPC recommended not accepting Schools "EEE" and "O" as part of the CIE amendments, unless the School District and County resolved any outstanding issues related to the CIE's financial feasibility. C. Document: Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) (1) Figure: Future Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map County Staff' Recommendation Pursuant to the agreement reached by senior management from the School District and County, staff recommends acknowledging to the Department of Community Affairs that 7 the opening of School "EEE" in 2012 may cause the Comprehensive Plan to be internally inconsistent. School District's Recommendation Retain the reference to the opening of School "EEE" on the map. CCPC Recommendation The CCPC recommended, removing the reference to the opening date of 2012 for School "EEE" from the map, unless a resolution is reached regarding issues related to the CIE's financial feasibility. /� MfCITE- E MOSC , ICP COMPREHENS E PLANNING DEPT. REVIEWED BY: DATE: ` DATE: 11-Z (D - 6 % 1 ail• DATE: Il Za o� MARJ IE M. STUDENT - STIRLING ASSITANT COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: DATE: 11 OZ0 0 INVIRONMENTAL SEPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES AND PETITION NO: CPSP- 2007 -7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY for the December 4, 2007 BCC Meeting mm/I1 -16 -07 RANDY CO N, AICP, DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPT. DATE: ` DATE: 11-Z (D - 6 % 1 ail• DATE: Il Za o� MARJ IE M. STUDENT - STIRLING ASSITANT COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: DATE: 11 OZ0 0 INVIRONMENTAL SEPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES AND PETITION NO: CPSP- 2007 -7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY for the December 4, 2007 BCC Meeting mm/I1 -16 -07 Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Vote: 5 -0 The CCPC recommended transmittal of the ILA with the following changes. • Add a list of acronyms to the document. [Reflected in Exhibit, behind Table of Contents] • 4`s Whereas Clause — Add the word, "potential" before the word deficit. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Definition Section — Under definition of Applicant, capitalize `residential development." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 3.1 — Insert sentence, "An agenda will be provided by School District staff one week in advance of all scheduled meetings." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 5.2 (c) — Revise text to read, "The number of building permits issued for new residential units, the number of units authorized, and the location of such residential units;" [Reflected in Exhibit] a Section 6.1 — Correct the spelling of "capacity." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 6.2 (a) —add (b) after "10.1" [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 7.1 — Add the phrase, "and off - site" after the word on -site. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 8.2 —Delete the word, "affect" and insert, "increase or decrease." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 11.4 — Before the word conducted, add the phrase, "open and accessible to the public, and," and end the sentence after the word "law." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 12.3 b. — Delete, "Alternatively, if (i) the County and the School District are unable to agree on another SBR Interlocal Agreement, (ii) the SBR Interlocal Agreement expires, and (iii) the County and the School District disagree over the review of a school site plan, then the County and the School District hereby agree that the School District shall file an action in the Circuit Court of Collier County seeking a declaratory judgment to resolve the dispute" and add, "In the absence of an SBR Interlocal Agreement, the School District shall be subject to the County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code, as amended, for site development plan review, subject to the exceptions of the Florida Statutes." [Reflected in Exhibit] 10 • Beginning in Section 13 and throughout the remainder of the document— Replace all references to "LOS standard" with "LOSS." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.1 (a), 3 "' sentence - Delete "of' and replace with "or". [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.3 (a) — Replace the word "zoned" with "zones." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.3 (b) 1. — Add text to clarify how the CSA boundaries are created. (ILA provision reads, "using the merger of Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and school attendance boundaries.) [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.4 0) — Delete the word, "Oversight" to make consistent with Section 11. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.5 (c) — Remove text, "thirty (30) days" and replace with, "two weeks." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.5 (e) — Remove the word, "majority ". [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.6, last sentence — Remove all text after "Local Governments" and insert, "thirty days prior to School Board review" and add a new last sentence, "Local Governments shall provide comments, if any, on the Tentative Educational Facilities Plan to School District staff two weeks prior to School Board review." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.7 (b) - Add "gap" language to enforce the provisions of the school concurrency program. [Reflected in Exhibit. Staff also included the same text in the PSFE under Policy 1.2.31 • Section 13.8 (a), P sentence — Add "provided such adoption does not affect the Local Governments' ability to maintain a financially feasible CIE for the current five - year period." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 13.8 (b) — Revise text to read, "The County and the Cities shall adopt Public School Facilities Elements which are consistent with each other." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 14.1 (c) — Revise list of exemptions to make consistent with the list of exemptions found in the Public School Facilities Element. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 14.1 (c) 6. — The County Attorney's Office was asked to confer with the Department of Community Affairs to determine whether to insert an effective date of "July 2005" to reflect SB 360 text, as requested by District staff /consultant or insert an effective date of "March 1, 2008," as suggested by the Assistant County Attorney 11 [Assistant County Attorney's text reflected in Exhibit. A response from the DCA is expected on this issue prior to transmittal or through the amendment review process.] • 14.2 (a) 2. — Revise text to read, "Within 20 days of receipt of a sufficient SIA application, the school district representative shall review the application and provide written comments to the Local Government. Each SIA application shall be reviewed in the order in which it is received." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 14.4, last sentence — Revise sentence to read, "This DRT shall be available for public viewing at the School District." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Section 14.5 (c) 5. — Delete the word, "Improvements" and insert the word, "Mitigation." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Appendix D — Revise timelines as agreed to by the staffs of the District and County. [Reflected in Exhibit] 12 Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) Vote: 5 -0 The CCPC recommended transmittal of the PSFE with the following changes. Determine consistency between the LOSS contained in the School Impact Fee Study (100% sq. ft per student station for each school type) and the LOSS identified in the ILA, PSFE and CIE (95% FISH capacity for elementary and middle and 100% FISH capacity for high schools) prior to adoption of the LOSS for school concurrency by the BCC. [The Comprehensive Planning Director discussed the methodology used in the School Impact Fee Study with the County's Impact Fee Manager. The Impact Fee Manager indicated that student enrollment figures and other variables were used to determine impact fees, not FISH capacity. The LOSS used to calculate Impact fees doesn't directly correlate with the LOSS calculation for school capacity - no consistency issue exists at this time. Further, the Impact Fee Manager explained that staff would discuss the LOSS methodology with the County's Impact Fee consultant next year when the School Impact Fee Study is updated. No action taken by staff at this time.] Policy 1.2.2 — Review list of exemptions in the PSFE to ensure consistency with those exemptions listed in the ILA. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Policy 1.2.2 A. & B. — Add effective date of "March 1, 2008" [Reflected in Exhibit] Policy 1.2.2 F. — The County Attorney's Office was asked to confer with the Department of Community Affairs to determine whether to insert an effective date of "July 2005" to reflect SB 360 text, as requested by District staff /consultant or insert an effective date of "March 1, 2008," as suggested by the Assistant County Attorney. [Assistant County Attorney's text reflected in Exhibit. A response from the DCA is expected on this issue prior to transmittal or through the amendment review process.] • Policy 1.2.2 F. — Add text to provide exemption for projects approved as a DRI that have school commitments, but that subsequently abandoned their DRI status. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Policy 1.2.5 — Delete Policy if not required by statute. [Policy deleted] • Policy 1.2.6 (renumbered -formerly Policy 1.2.5) —Delete reference to "180 days" and insert "one year." [Reflected in Exhibit] • Objective 1.3 — Delete `Beginning in" and insert `By December." [Reflected in Exhibit] 13 Policy 1.3.3 — Delete the word, "ensure" and insert "determine." [Reflected in Exhibit] Policy 1.3.5 — Revise Policy to reflect text contained in 9J -5.025 (3)(c) 11., F.A.C. [Reflected in Exhibit] • Future Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map — Remove reference to the opening date of 2012 for Combo School EEE, unless the School District and the County resolve any issue relating to the financially feasibility of the CIE. [Map has not yet been revised by the School District to reflect the CCPC's recommendation.] 14 Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations Public School Facilities Element —Data and Analysis Report • The CCPC did not make a recommendation on the Data and Analysis Report. • The School District staff provided County staff with revised School Concurrency tables, reflecting school capacity within the District's 5 -year planning period subsequent to the CCPC hearing. [Revised tables included in the Data and Analysis Exhibit] • The School District staff provided County staff with revised "Summary of Capital Improvement Program" tables, reflecting revisions to capital expenditure figures and the removal of school "O" from the District's Five -Year CIP, prior to the CCPC hearing. [Revised tables included in the Data and Analysis Exhibit] 15 Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Vote: 5 -0 The CCPC recommended transmittal of the CIE with the following changes. • Policy 1. 1.5 A8. 1 -3 — Revise to read, "CSA/Permanent FISH Capacity" [Reflected in Exhibit] • Policy 1.2.4 — Review Policy to determine whether or not reference to "public schools" is needed. Determine how removal /retention of reference affects other Policies within that same section of the CIE. [Reference removed and other Policies revised to make Element internally consistent] • Programs to Ensure Implementation, 6. B. — Delete the phrase, "at the end of and insert, "within." [Reflected in Exhibit] • School District's "Summary of Capital Improvement Program" — The CCPC recommended not accepting Schools "FEE" and "O" as part of the CIE amendments, unless the School District and County were able to resolve any outstanding issues related to the financial feasibility of the CIE. Also, the CCPC requested that staff note to the DCA that the County and School District have reached an impasse on this issue, if unresolved prior to transmittal. [Staff will discuss this issue with the BCC on December 4, 2007 and then take action as directed.] Staff changes to the CIE subsequent to the CCPC Hearing • Objective 1.1 — Revised Objective to make corresponding policies consistent. • Policy 1. 1.2 C. — Deleted `,or as generating a number of new public school students in excess of the adopted LOS standard for each Concurrency Service Area (CSA) for each school type." [Reference not applicable — methodologies differ] • Objective 1.2 — Revised Objective to make corresponding policies consistent. • Policy 1.2.4 —Deleted reference to public schools. [Reference not applicable] • Policy 1.4.2 - Deleted reference to the adoption of the School District's CIP in Policy 1.4.1 and created new Policy 1.4.2. to include reference. [Reference not applicable under Policy 1.4.1] • Programs to Ensure Implementation, 6. — Revised to make corresponding provisions consistent. 16 Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Vote: 6 -0 a The CCPC recommended transmittal of the ICE without any changes. 17 -- RESOLUTION NO. 07- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89 -05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CAPITAL D14PROVEMENT ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, AND ADDING A PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared plan amendments to the following elements of its Growth Management Plan: Capital Improvement Element; Interlocal Agreement Coordination Element; and WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared a new element to its Growth Management Plan as follows: Public School Facilities Element; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has considered the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, and has recommended approval of said amendments to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan amendments, various State agencies and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) have ninety (90) days to review the proposed amendments and DCA must transmit, in writing, to Collier County, its comments along with any objections and any recommendations for modification, within said ninety (90) days pursuant to Section 163.3164, Florida Statutes; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DCA must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan amendments, within sixty (60) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the DCA, within forty -five (45) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan amendments, must review and determine if the Plan amendments are in compliance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Act of 1985; the State Comprehensive Plan; the appropriate Regional Policy Plan and Rule 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan amendments, prior to final adoption and State determination of compliance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and land Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Rule 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion; second and majority vote this day of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: �'(�'° Marjorie M. Student- Stirling Assistant County Attorney to Page 2 of 2 JAMES COT.ETTA, CHAIRMAN 1 'J elk Table of Contents for the Interlocal Agreement Introduction................................................................................................... ..............................1 Section1. Recitals ....................................................................................... ..............................2 Section2. Definitions ................................................................................... ..............................3 Section 3. Joint Workshop Meetings 6 3_.1 Staff Working Group 3.2 Meeting of Elected Officials Section 4. Student Enrollment and Population Projections 7 4.1 Projection Coordination 4.2 Student Enrollment Projections 4.3 Sub - County Planning Sectors 4.4 Student Generation Multipliers 4.5 Population Projections Section 5. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 8 5.1 Capital Improvements Plan 5.2 Growth and Development Trends Section 6. School Site Selection and School Remodeling Review g 6.1 School Site Selection and School Remodeling 6.2 Site Selection Review 6.3 Timing Section 7. Supporting Infrastructure...12 Section 8. Local Agency Review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments Rezonings and Developments of Regional Impact 12 8.1 School District Representation on the Local Planning Agency 8.2 Notification of Potential Enrollment Impacts 8.3 School District Response 8.4 Insufficient Capacity 8.5 Review Criteria 8.6 Community Development Section 9. Educational Plant Survey ... 14 ii Words underlined are added; words strusk-thfao o are deleted 02/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Section 10. Co- Location and Shared Use ................................................... .............................14 Section 11 Citizen Advisory Oversight Group ........... .. ......... ............ .. ................14 13.3 Concurrence Service Area Boundaries 11.1 Establishment 11.2 Membership 11.3 Duties 11.4 Organization Section 12. Site Plan Review for Schools ................................................... .............................16 13.9 School Concurrence Regulations 12.1 School Site Plan Review Section 14 12.2 Local Government Approval 12.3 Alternative Review Process 14.1 Section 13 Requirements for the School Concurrence Program ................. .............................14 14.2 13.1 School Concurrence Established 13.2 Level of Service 13.3 Concurrence Service Area Boundaries 13.4 Specific Responsibilities of the School District 13.5 School District's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 13.6 Tentative Educational Facilities Plan 13.7 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities 13.8 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments 13.9 School Concurrence Regulations 13.10 Commencement of School Concurrence Section 14 Uniform School Concurrence Process . ................................... .............................22 14.1 General Provisions 14.2 School Concurrence Application Review 14.3 School Concurrence Approval 14.4 Development Review Table 14.5 Proportionate Share Mitigation 14.6 Appeal Process Section 15 Special Provisions .............. ............................................. .............................28 15.1 School District Requirements 15.2 Land Use Authority Section 16 Resolution of Disputes ............................ ............................................. ...29 Section 17 Amendment of the Agreement ........................................... .............................29 iii Words underlined are added; words stFWGk tMsegh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Section 18. Execution of the Agreement 29 Section 19. Termination of the Agreement 29 Section 20. Entire Agreement .... 30 Section21. Effective Date ........................................................................... .............................30 Signature Pages.. 30 34 Appendix ................... 35 38 Appendix "A" — Concurrencv Service Area (CSA) Maps Appendix `B" — School District Student Generation Multiplier Appendix "C — School Concurrencv Review Process Flow Chart Appendix "D" — Calendar of Key Annual Deadlines 1v Words underlined are added; words sHask4hraugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Appendix List of Acronyms CAG Citizen Advisory Group CIE Capital Improvement Element CIP School District Five -Year Capital Improvement Element COA Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy CSA Concurrency Service Areas DRI Development of Regional Impact DRT Development Review Table FAC Florida Administrative Code FDOE Florida Department of Education FISH Florida Inventory of School Houses FTE Full -Time Equivalent FS Florida Statutes ICE Intergovernmental Coordination Element LDR Land Development Regulations LOSS Level of Service Standard PSFE Public School Facilities Element SBR Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida and the Collier County School Board to establish Educational Plant and Ancillary Plant Site Development Review Processes and Substantive Criteria including the Consideration of Future Implementing Land Development Regulations. SCADL School Capacity Availability Determination Letter SGM Student Generation Multiplier SIA School Impact Analysis SREF State Requirements for Educational Facilities SWG Staff Working Group TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone v Words underlined are added; words GIFUSk thFough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY This Interlocal Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement" is entered into by and between the following parties: Tthe Collier County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County "); Everalades City. a municipal corporation; the City of u clrnlaner couecgveiv reterrea to as the "Cities ") and the District School Board of Collier County, FJerada (hereinafter referred to as the "School @ea*d District "). The County, the Cities, and the School District- iseettaeK are hereinafter referred to collective) as the "Parties ". WHEREAS, the Parties recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well -being of the children of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the benefits to the citizens and students of their community by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs to ensare promote: (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development; (2) greater efficiency for the Parties Seanty key through the placement of schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, parks, and drainage systems; (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs ekhe- Seamy; (4) the location and design of schools so that they serve as community focal points; (5) the location and design of schools with parks, ballfields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities; and (6) the location of new schools and expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to reduce pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support existing neighborhoods; and stations, and to provide capacity for projected new growth: and WHEREAS, Section1013.33 (10), Flerida Siatates F_S., requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the County and Cities. (hereinafter to(Jether referred to as the "Local Governments ") ; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h) 1 and 2, Flerida Statutes F_S., require each Local Ggovernment's comprehensive plan include to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as paFt of itG GOMPFeheR64ye plan that states stating the principles and guidelines to be used in the to accomplishment of the coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the School District Rrheel-Fieard, and describe the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2, F4e4da-64auAe6__F_S., further requireela easq the Parties to Words underlined are added; words AtFunk thFeugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) establish by interlocal or other formal agreement, executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described above consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination element; and WHEREAS Sections 163.31777 163.3180031, and 1013.33. F.S.. require the Parties WHEREAS the Local Governments are entering into this Agreement in reliance on the address projected growth in order to maintain the adopted level of service standard and to the public school system and the Cities have similar iurisdiction within their boundaries; and WHEREAS, the pPParties enter into this Agreement in fulfillment of the above referenced statutory requirements and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and students described above; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 163.01, SeetiGR 163.3177(6)(h)2., and Sestien1013.33(2)(a), €aeFida StatetesF.S.; and WHEREAS, upon the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) acceptance of this Agreement, and upon the commitment of the Parties hereto to abide by and seek fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, that-DCA shall recognize the Agreement as fully satisfying €lerodn Statates Sections 1013.33 and 163.3177 F.S. . requirements for cooperative planning for all Parties involved, both individually and collectively. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the public benefits to be realized from the coordinationed- planning and review of public educational facilities' planning and the use of a school concurrence system, the Parties hereby agree as follows: Words underlined are added; words etFU& t Hugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Section 1. Recitals The foregoing recitals are adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. The following definitions and procedures will be used to coordinate public facilities planning, aad -land use planning and school concurrence: Section 2. Definitions to vehicle storage and maintenance warehouses or administrative buildings Applicant: For the purposes of school concurrence any person or entity undertaking a Residential Development Attendance Boundary: The geographic area which is established to identify the public school assignment of students residing within that area Cities: The municipalities within Collier County, except those that are exempt from the Public School Facilities Element Pursuant to Section 163 3177(12) F.S. there are a sufficient number of classrooms in a public school so that exceed 18 students: 2. The maximum number of students who are assigned to each teacher who is teaching in public school classrooms for grades 4 through 8 does not exceed 22 students: and Words underlined are added; words s4usk4hreuO are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) students. Comprehensive Plan: As provided by Section 163.3164(4), F.S.. as amended, a plan that meets the requirements of 163.3177 and 163.3178. F.S. Concurrence: As provided for in the Florida Administrative Code Rule 9J -5.003 the necessary public facilities and services to maintain the adopted level of service standards are available when the impacts of development occur. Consistency: As provided by Section 163.3194. F.S. cafeteria gymnasium multi - purpose space and administration. Development: As provided by Sections 163.3164(6) and 380.04. F.S. Developer: As provided by Section 163.3164(5) F.S. Development Order: As provided by Section 163.3164(7), F.S., as amended, anv order granting or granting with conditions an application for a development permit Development Permit As provided by Section 163.3164(8), F.S. Development Review Table: A table used by the School District to compare the Educational Facility The buildings and equipment structures and special educational use areas that are built installed or established to serve educational purposes only. validation The survey includes an inventory of existing educational and ancillary plants and recommendations for future needs. 4 Words underlined are added; words are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) IVV.�IIrrrllncr r.o. Financial Feasibility: As provided in Section 163.3164(32). F.S.. as amanriari Governmental Agency: As provided by Section 163 3164 (10) F.S. N 1Q1 Qt tyl 10 Llub VI Intl Idulity. VI a U111 I V I n UIpU IUI-WIUU. Words underlined are added; words etraek4preuO are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) teacher based on the constitutional amendment for class size reduction and is not moveable. Department of Education (FDOE). been addressed. which results in an increase in student impacts. Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwellino units, in whole or in part, for human habitation. Service Area for each school tvoe. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGkthF@ugh are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) time. as permitted by the F.S. historic and projected growth rates Type of School: Schools providing the same level of education i.e. elementary middle, high school, or other combination of grade levels Utilization: A ratio showing the comparison of the total number of students for each Section 23. Joint Workshop Meetings 243_1 Staff Working Group (SWG). A staff working group with up to four staff -level representatives from the�-each Local Government Geunty and the School District will meet on an as needed basis, but no less frequently than twice -four times per year, to formulate recommendations and discuss issues regarding coordination of land use, afld wheel educational facilitiesy, Local Government capital improvements planning, ipsladiagsac# and issues such as population and student enrollment projections, development trends, school needs, co- location and joint use opportunities, and arrsiAary-infrastructure improvements needed to support toe schools. The SWG will also be responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on the School District Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. And vilu neuK iii auvance pr aii scneouiea meetings Representatives from the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. The School District --s ff, in coordination with the Local Governments' Geenty Managers, or their designees (or the Mayor if there is not a Manager), will be responsible for appointlna their respective staff representatives to the cwr_ meeting in 2995 Thereaftef; Tthe process for meeting arrangementsy and notification will be as established by a- rsrajerity -et -the members of the waking greup -SWG then present. 2.2 -3_2 Meeting of Elected Officials. One or more of the elected members of the County Commission, City Council for each City and the School Board wit shall meet, at a minimum, every other year in a publicly noticed joint workshop session. Additional ublic workshops may be held upon request by one of the Parties to the Agreement . The joint workshop Words underlined are added; words skask-ip;sugh are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) sessions will be opportunities for the Parties to build consensus, and set direction regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including, but not limited to the following: population and student estimates and projections, development trends, school needs, off site improvements, and joint use opportunities. The Local Government Gounty Managers and School BeaFd SUPBFintend District will be jointly responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing ublic notification for the joint workshops. Section 34. Student Enrollment and Population Projections 4_1 Projection Coordination. In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the Gaunty —Local Governments and the School District SsheeL Real —agree to coordinate their respective plans to include capital improvement plans and future land use plans based upon agFeed tion projections distribution of population growth, and the amount of, residential units by type (single family, multi - family, etc.) and the School District's distribution of student population growth and student enrollment. 4_23.3 - Student Enrollment Projections. The School District Sshee(BeaFd shall utilize the Florida Department of Education (EDOE) five -year county -wide student enrollment projections. The School Beard District may request that the EDGE projections be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment and development trends not anticipated by the EDOE projections using the COHORT Projections Waiver available on the FDOE website. In formulating such a request the School 13eaFd District will coordinate with the Local Governments Geunty regarding future population projections and growth. Five -year population and student enrollment projections shall be revised annually to ensure that new residential development and redevelopment information provided by the Geunty Local Governments are reflected in the updated projections. The student enrollment proiections by school will be included in the annually 4_33:3 Sub - County Planning Sectors. Staff from the Local Governments CeURty in coordination with " School Board District staff, will use information on County-growth and development trend data, such as but not limited to, population and housing data by Traffic Analysis Zones, (TAZ), census +nfOFinaiien on population and housing characteristics, census persons -per- household figures, historic and projected growth rates, and the information described in Subsection 45.2 of this Agreement, to project residential units by type (single family, multi - family and mobile home) for five years and allocate these units into sub - county planning sectors, such as Concurrence Service Areas (CSAs) consistent with county -wide projections. The planning sectors will be established by mutual consent of the Ssheef BeaFd Parties and shall be included in the Data and Analysis for the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE). The allocation of residential units by type and planning sector will be provided to the School SeaFd District by September 1 st of each year. 4.43-.4Student Generation Multipliers (SGM). The School Beard District will evaluate the planning sector projections prepared by the Geunt-y Local Governments pursuant to Section 4.3 above. Words underlined are added; words struck thFOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) including, but not limited to, traditional public elementarv, middle and hinh cr.hnnrc Section 45. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 5 -1 School District Capital Improvement Plan (CIPI By November 1st of each year, the School Board District shall submit to the Local Governments G^��� an a the School District's annually updated financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Fae "41a^ rt. The Repor -CIP will contain Information in tabular, graphic, and textual formats detailing existing and projected school enrollment, existing educational facilities, their locations, the number of portable units (hereinafter "portables ") in use at each school, and projected facility needs. The Gapital plan CIP shall also contain the School District's,asldde planned facilities with funding over the next 5 years, and a description of any unmet needs. The ReporFCIP w&shall provide data for each individual school concerning school capacity based on EDGE criteria and enrollment of each individual school based on actual student counts. The -CIP w&shall show the generalized locations in which new schools will be needed, along with planned renovations, expansions and closures of existing schools. The CIP Reper# -will -shall indicate propertyies the School Board District has already acquired through developer Applicant donation; -or property!% for which there is an developer--Applicant obligation to provide propertyies to the School Beard - District, at the School Beard's District's discretion. and propertyies- acquired through other means that are potential school sites. 5_24.x- Growth and Development Trends_ 9rt-By September 1st of each year, the 6eeaty -Local Governments will provide the School 9ea4gistrict with a report on 9 Words underlined are added; words sirusktpreA gO are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) annual growth and development trends. The report will contain information in tabular, graphic and textual formats and will include information regarding development approvals for the preceding year as follows: (a) the type, number, and location of residential dwelling units which have received zoning approval, final subdivision plat approval, or site plan approval; (b) a summary of all comprehensive plan amendments to include a description of any land use changes and the location of the affected area; (c) the number of building permits issued for new residential dwelling units, the number of units authorized, pefn4#ed and the location of such residential dwelling units; (d) information regarding the conversion or redevelopment of housing or other structures into residential dwelling units which are likely to generate new students; and (e) identification of any development orders issued which contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a condition of development approval. The estimated number of students generated from the development approvals from new residential dwelling units will be used in the data and analysis to support the annual update of the School Beard - District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. Five ireaF Appendix "D" provides a suggested calendar of events for the Parties to this Agreement Section 66. School Site Selection and School Remodeling Review 6.164School Site Selection and School Remodeling. The School Beard District will shall submit to the a#ested applicable Local Government the potential sites for new schools, and proposals for renevatien expansions, construction that changes the primary use of a .. 10 Words underlined are added; words 64WA thMugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 0. MU F GIGSUFe is evaluated. Based on the information gathered during this its review, the applicable Local Government will make a recommendation to the School District Site SAIAntiAn cqfflmittee concerning the selection of the potential school sites on eFder Of PFElfeFGAG9, prior to land acquisition and, if applicable, nqLk schools closure, expansions, construction that chanaes the Limit nve Percent Increase In student capacity 6_2 6-.2Sfte Selection Review. The following matters will be considered by the applicable Local Government ' when evaluating potential school sites, expansions, construction that chances the primary use of a increase in student capacity charter sshee4s: (a) The location of school sites that will provide logical focal points for community activities such as the G9MFRUR't gqbk facilities itemized in Subsection 810.10 and serve as the cornerstone for innovative urban design standards, including opportunities for shared use and co- location of community facilities. (b) The location of new elementary and middle schools proximate to residential neighborhoods. (c) The location of new schools within reasonable walking distance of the residential dwelling units served by the schools, as practicable, under the student assignment program. (d) The location of new high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with access to major roads. (e) Compatibility of the school site with present and projected uses of adjacent property. (f) Encouragement of community redevelopment and revitalization and efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl. (g) Land availability, site acquisition and development costs, and degree of urbanization. (h) Safe access to and from the school site by pedestrians and vehicles. (i) Availability of public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed school, concurrent with the impacts of the school. 11 Words underlined are added; words strask threugp are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (j) Environmental constraints that could preclude development of a public school on the site if mitigation is not available or practicable. (k) Impact on archaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by the County Local Government as a locally significant historic or archaeological resource. (1) Soil characteristics that indicate the proposed site is suitable for development or is adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with the provision of drainage improvements. (m) The proposed location in relation to qty the Local Government's stormwater management plans or watershed management plans. (n) The proposed location in relation to the velocity -flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the Local Government's Comprehensive Geunty GFevAh ManagGFRGRtPlan. (o) The ability of the site to accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles. (p) The proposed location in relation to any airports considering the requirements of Section 333.03, PleFida Statutes F_S., which regulates the construction of public educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport. 6.3g.4Timing. As early as prastie2b4e-120 Jays, but no less than 60 days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility, expansions construction that chances the primary use of a facility . stadium construction, or construction which results in a treater than five percent increase in student capacity ^ 9_ ^^ OF eXPaRGiGR ^u^^'i^^ sapaelty of an existing school, the School BeaFd - District shall provide written notice of same to the Geunty applicable Local Government. The Geunty -Local Government upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the School District within 45 days if the proposed new school site or expansions, construction that changes the primary use of a facility, stadium construction, or construction which results in a greater than five percent increase in student capacity the site fGF the PFOP96ed is consistent with is Comprehensive Plan. The Local Government shall also provide the School District with a preliminary assessment of potential infrastructure imnacts.This preliminary notice does not constitute toe County's a determination of consistency by the Local Government pursuant to Section 1013.33(124), riwida Stabites F.S. Section 67. Supporting Infrastructure 7_1 In conjunction with the preliminary consistency determination described in SubsSection &.4 6 of this Agreement, the School fwd District and Geunty- the affected Local Government will jointly determine the need for, and timing of, onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements to public facilities necessary to 6ewe 12 Words underlined are added; words GtFUGl0hFGugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) support each new school or the proposed renovation, or expansion of an existing school, and will enter into a written agreement, or amend a current agreement if applicable, to be consistent with this Agreement as to the timing, and location, and the entity- er-- eR##es_2artv or parties responsible for mainiaining funding, construction operation and maintaining the required improvements In accordance with Sections 1013.33(3)(d) and 163.31777(2)(d), F.S. 7.2 The Parties and other governmental agencies and boards of the state may expend SLurinwater, ano uyiny Improvements upon or contiguous t0 any existing or proposed educational plant. 7.3 In accordance with 1013.51 (1)(b) The School District may pay its pr000rtionate _. Section 78. Local Planning Agency Review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezonings, and Developments of Regional Impact Which Increase Residential Density Approvals 8_17,A School District Representation on the Local Planning Agency. As provided by Section 163.3174. F.S.. as may be amended from time to time T-the Geunty Local Governments will include a nonvoting representative appointed by the School Board on the local planning agency, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agency considers comprehensive plan amendments, and rezonings, and Developments of Regional Impact (DRI) that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The Seuaty -Local Governments may, at its in their discretion, grant voting status to the School District representative. The School Beard - District will receive local planning agency's agendas and appropriate backup materials from the Local Governments Geuaty nd will review and comment as appropriate. 8_27 -r2 Notification of Potential Enrollment Impacts The Local Governments Geanty will provide the School (Heard District notification of all land use appliGatieRs Comprehensive Plan Amendments rezonings and DRIB pending 1)64X-G--it—that may affeet increase or decrease student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. Such notice will be provided at least 44 20 days prior to approval of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, rezonings, nd DRls; and 13 Words underlined are added; words sFruskThreugp are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 8_37-.3 School District Beard- Response. After notification by the GeeRty Local Government, the School Beard District will-shall advise the Geunty- Local Government, at least 10 days prior to application approval, of the school enrollment impacts anticipated to result from the proposed land use appNsatier}- Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning or DRI, OF development prepesa"nd whether sufficient capacity exists or is planned in order to accommodate the impacts. 8_47.4 Insufficient Capacity. Based on the 005 definitien At adequate eapaGity adopted LOSS for schools, if sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School Beard District shall specify how ii the anticipated student enrollment deficiency. demand; rAeans to eRGUFB that 61-0406ARt A914001 eapaGity will be available to arrernmedate the If sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the developer may choose to offer, and the School District may consider accepting mitigation to address the anticipated student impact. The review by the School District staff regarding comprehensive plan amendments, rezoninas and Developments of Regional Impact containina residential units shall described in this Section fail to yield a means to ensure sufficient capacity. 8_57,5 Review Criteria. In reviewing and approving land use applications, rezoning requests and develepment pFepGsais DRIs, the Glaui*-Loca L Governments will consider, if applicable, the following issues WheA FEIqUeSted 13Y the SGhGGI 13eaFd: (a) Providing school sites and facilities within planned neighborhoods. (b) Insuring the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. (c) The co- location of parks, recreation and community facilities with school sites. (d) The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. (e) Insuring the development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and the surrounding neighborhood. (f) Providing off -site signalization, signage, access, other transportation improvements and sidewalks to all-serve schools. 14 Words underlined are added; words are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (g) The inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new developments. (h) Encouraging the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. (i) School District Ueacd comments on Comprehensive Plan amendments rezonings and DRIs. which increase residential density. (j) Available school capacity, planned improvements or mitigation for insufficient apacity. 8.68 Community Development. In formulating community development plans and programs, the Geuaty Local Governments will consider the following issues: (a) Target community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. (b) Coordinate 6eunty- programs and capital improvements that are consistent with and meet the capital needs identified in the School District's >3eaFd'6 school facilities plan. (c) Encourage developments and property owners to donate school sites at predevelopment prices, assist with the construction of new facilities or renovateien to existing facilities, and provide transportation alternatives. (d) Address and resolve multi - jurisdictional public school issues. Section 89. Educational Plant Survey 9_78=4 Educational Plant Survey. At least one year prior to preparation of the educational plant survey update, the staff working group SWG established in Subsection 23_.1 of this Agreement will assist the School Beard District in the preparation of this update pursuant to Section 1013.33 (3)(f) F S The sta# werkiag group -SWG will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new educational facilities, or improvements to existing educational facilities, in terms of consistency with the applicable Local Governments' SOURty Comprehensive Plan GreMh Management 121an, and fele ,eland development regulations issues listed at SubGeMienlii 6.2,7.6 and 9.1 ei this Agreemen . 8 Section 810. Co- location and Shared Use. 10.18.4 Co- location and Shared Use. Co- location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School District heard and the Local Governments Sedaty. 15 Words underlined are added; words 64ask4Meugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) u The School DistrictSeard, in coordination with Local Governments, will look for opportunities to co- locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the its Educational Plant Survey and annual Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co- location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the Seunty Local Governments, in coordination with the School District, when preparing the updates to its —their Comprehensive Plan, Schedule of Capital Improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, semmaaitY public facilities. €er (b.) At the time that any Party to this agreement begins to plan a new facility or significant improvement to an existing facility, it shall notify the other Parties so as to engage a dialogue regarding co- location and ioint use of facilities. other Parties. Opportunities for co- location and shared use of facilities will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers. auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performinq arts centers, and stadiums. In addition, where applicable, co- location and shared use of school and governmental facilities for health care and social services will be considered. "ic.1 A separate agreement between the School District BeaFdand the Geuaty Local Government or other appropriate entity, will be developed for each instance of co- location and shared use which addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision. Section 4011. Citizen Advisory Group 11.1 Establishment. The Parties agree that the School Concurrence program will be monitored by a Citizen Advisory Group (CAG) to be established by the Parties to this Agreement no later than 90 days from the date this Agreement becomes Florida's Government -in- the - Sunshine Law requirements, and each Local Government's ordinances, as applicable, governing the creation of, conduct of, and meeting notice requirements for advisory boards. 11.2 Membership. The School Board, and -the County Commission and each Citv Council shall eaeh appoint a no more than two (2) citizen members to serve on the CAG . The citizen members shall have knowledge or experience in at least one of the following areas: accounting, land development, demographics, land planning or business administration. te-- meaner 16 Words underlined are added; words siwsk thFeugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) school concurrence. 11.4 Organization. At its first meeting the CAG shall appoint a chairperson set terms Section 1412.Site Plan Review for Schools 12.1 12.2 12.3 a. 17 Words underlined are added; Words skdsktHreugH are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 11 The School District and the County recognize the existence of, and shall DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESSES AND SUBSTANTIVE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS TO THE process, as it may be amended from time to time. The School District and the County currently intend that this Aareement shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms. Section 13. Requirements for the School Concurrence Program 13.1 School Concurrence Established. This Agreement establishes a Public School Concurrence program consistent with the requirements of Sections 163.3177 163.31777 and 163.3180. F.S. (a) The Parties agree that the timely delivery of adequate public school facilities at the adopted level of service standard requires close coordination among residential areas to the extent possible, provided the schools are proximate residential plats, site plans or functional eauivalents which will have an impact on school capacity and the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. (b) The Parties agree that, within the County's iurisdiction and each City's 18 Words underlined are added; words sirask*FGugb are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 13.2 13.3 (a) geographic areas known as Concurrence Service Areas (CSAs) (a) (b) Facilities Element. 2. The CSA maps are provided for informational purposes only in Appendix "A" of this Agreement. 1. which to measure the level of service standard 2. Specialized schools shall not be included in the CSA's identified above vary in size, and may target a specific type of student and can limit the 19 Words underlined are added; Words GtFUA thFaugh are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (c) ape groups or grade levels. 1. The adopted LOSS will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five -year planning period: and 2. The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the greatest (d) The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA boundary maps: 1. The School District, in coordination with Local Governments shall review the proposed CSA boundaries and the data and analysis used to support the changes, and determine whether or not a change is analysis to the local government for review and comment. 2. Local governments shall review and comment on the proposed changes within forty -five (45) days of receipt. 3. approval of the new CSA boundary map by the School Board. New maps of the CSA boundaries shall also be included as data and analysis in support of the local governments' PSFE. 13.4 Specific Responsibilities of the School District. By entering into this Agreement, the School District agrees to do the following subject to the provision that none of the following shall exceed the requirements of the Florida Statutes: (a) (b) In coordination with Local Governments, annually prepare and update a financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan containing enough requirements of this Agreement. (c) Construct the capacity enhancing and modernization proiects which, when completed, will add sufficient capacity to achieve and maintain the adopted LOSS for all CSAs based on the proiected enrollment: provide for reauired 20 Words underlined are added; words stfuGlk thFough are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 13.5 (d) (e) (f) u ie ueyetyurnem at new resiaenyai owelling units amendments relating to school concurrencv (g) Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with concurrencv standards, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement (h) Review proportionate share mitigation options for new residential development consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and Section 163.3180 (13)(01 F.S. G) (k) auimy to Tuna the capital Improvement projects for the five year planning period as amended annually. (a) IMM (b) Timing. The School District shall update and adopt the Five -Year Capital 21 Words underlined are added; words skasktpreugp are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (C) (d) (e) shall: 1. Specify all new construction, remodeling or renovation proiects which will add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities. 2. Include a description of each school project, a listing of funds to be spent in each fiscal year, includina proportionate share mitigation funding, for the planning, preparation, land acquisition, construction or if any: and a generalized location map for proposed schools included in the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. 3. Identify the projected enrollment, capacity and utilization percentage of all schools. The School District, in coordination with Local Governments, shall annually update the Concurrence Service Area Boundaries, as necessary, and the "Summary of Capital Improvement Plan" and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" tables when uodating the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for review and comment. Transmittal of the proposed draft annually updated and financially feasible Capital Improvement Program, but no later than April 1 st of each year. The transmittal of the final draft of the proposed annually updated and financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan to Local Governments shall occur on or before August 1st of each year commencing after the effective date of this Agreement. student capacity in the first three (3) years of the Plan unless the School District, with the concurrence of a vote by its Board members, provides written confirmation that: 1. The modification, delay or deletion of a project is required in order to meet the School District's constitutional obligation to provide a 22 Words underlined are added; words straslFtpreugb are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) _. 13.6 13.7 Q 3. The project schedule or scope has been modified to address Local 4. The SWG for school concurrence as detailed in Section 3 of this The School Board, in coordination with Local Governments may amend the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan at any time to add necessary capacity its ability to maintain the financial feasibility of the Plan for the current five - year planning period. Ducal uovernments mirty gays prior to School Board review. Local (a) Adoot the required school concurrence provisions into their Land 23 Words underlined are added; Words skaskkipreugh are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (b) that there is school capacity available to serve the development being approved consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. (c) Share information with the School District regarding population projections, to future land use elements which increase residential density. (d) 13.8 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities agree to adopt the following Comprehensive Plan amendments no later than 163.3180. F.S. (a) Governments for review and comment no less than 60 days prior to adoption by the School Board. The County and the Cities shall adopt by reference the School District's annually updated financially feasible Capital Improvement Plan, specifically the "Summary of Capital Improvement the "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" and "Summary of financially feasible CIE for the current five -year planning period. The amended Tables shall be adopted by reference each year by the Local Governments. This shall occur in the Local Government's next available comprehensive plan amendment cycle, but no later than December Vt of each year. This will ensure that the CIE uniformly sets forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities plan, consistent with the adopted Level of Service standards for public schools. 1. Corrections or modifications to the School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan "Summary of Capital Improvement Plan" Table or the revenue sources, or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications, may be accomplished by ordinance, and shall not be deemed an amendment to the comprehensive plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs. 24 Words underlined are added; words sfrask- thFOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 13.9 (b) (c) 2. responsibility for tundina the School District Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. adopted and when it becomes effective In the event that it becomes necessary to amend the SFE, the Local for review ana comment. A 91 dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the provisions set clan, ana must not have a cost implication or create additional coordination for School District. adopt school concurrence provisions into its land development regulations 25 Words underlined are added; words sirusk4hreuo are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 13.10 (LDR) consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. (a) The County and the Cities shall amend their LDRs to implement school concurrence provisions for the review of plats, site plans or the functional equivalent, which increase residential density. 1. 4 the County regulations and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions therein until it adopts its own ordinance. with its Comprehensive Plan. Section 14. Uniform School Concurrence Process 14.1 General Provisions. The County, the Cities and the School District shall ensure that the Level of Service Standard established for each school type is achieved and maintained. (a) No plat, site plan or the functional equivalent for new residential exists within a CSA for each school type. (b) A Local Government may condition the approval of the application to ensure that necessary school facilities are in place, in order to validate or render effective the approval. This shall not limit the authority of a Local Government to denv a plat, site plan or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers (c) The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the requirements of school concurrence: 1. Single family and mobile home lots of record, existing as of March 1, 2008. 2. Any new residential development that has a final plat or site plan 3. Any amendment to any previously approved residential development 26 Words underlined are added; words stwok thmugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 14.2 (d) 5. All new residential plats and site plans (or functional eguivalent) or amendments to previously approved residential development orders 6. Development that has been authorized as a Development of Regional regional impact status. as to whether or not a development lot or unit is exempt from the requirements of school concurrence (a) Appendix "G ". The process is as follows: 1. 2. 27 Words underlined are added; words skaek44reugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 0 U 5. proposed development. a. this Aareement. b. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or under actual construction in the first three years of the School District's Capital Plan will be added to the capacity shown in the CSA and is counted as available capacity for the residential development under review. exceeded in the CSA, an adiacent CSA will be reviewed for available capacity. 9 evaluated for available capacity to satisfy space required to accommodate the projected enrollment. If capacity is identified b. If a proposed development causes the LOSS in the CSA in having available capacity. This shift may be accomplished impacted. mitiqation process described below in Section 14.5 of this Agreement. If 28 Words underlined are added; words Nrask through are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 14.3 14.4 6. When capacity has been determined to be available the School District 7. Its school Impact fees have been paid (a) (b) (c) development. The Local Government shall not issue a building permit or its functional (a) Student enrollment voiections shall be based on the most recently adopted 29 Words underlined are added; words skask4hFeugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) School District CIP, and the DRT shall be updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived using the following formula: Available Capacity = CSA Capacity' — (EnrollmenF + Vested3) Where z Enrollment = Total CSA Student enrollment as counted at the Fall FTE 3 Vested = Students aenerated from residential developments approved and receiving a SCADL after the implementation of school concurrence (b) Using the Fall FTE, the vested number of students on the DRT for the CSA will be reduced by the number of students for each school type represented by the residential units that received certificates of occupancy within the previous twelve (12) month period. 14.5 Proportionate Share Mitigation. In the event there is not sufficient school capacity available within the adopted LOSS to support an Applicant's development. the School District in coordination with the applicable Local Government may consider proportionate share mitigation options and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the Applicant and the Local Government to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional school capacity. (a) When the student impacts from a proposed development cause a failure to meet the adopted LOSS, the Applicant's proportionate share will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to meet the established LOSS for the affected school type(s). The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle, and high school types as determined and published by the State of Florida. plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites. (b) The methodology used to calculate an Applicant's proportionate share mitigation shall be as follows: Proportionate Share = ('Development students - Available Capacity) x Total Costa per student station Where the following definitions apply: 'Development students = Students generated by residential development that are assigned to that CSA for the affected school type(s). aTotal Cost = the cost per student station by school type, as determined and published by the State of Florida. plus a proportionate share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites as determined and published annually in the School District's Five Year 30 Words underlined are added; words s%Fuek !hFaugtt are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (c) Capital Improvement Plan. enrorceaple agreement with the School Board and the Local Government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development order 1. 2. 0 the proposed residential development the Applicant may pay his Agreement. residential development, if it is funded through the Applicant's S C. fIj e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations or core capacity: or f 31 Words underlined are added; Words 54HOk 111FOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Ia mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future construction costs at the time of the anticipated construction. the Applicant's educational impact used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate share mitigation is calculated. responsibility of the Applicant. 7. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School District toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School District's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. F1 functional equivalent, the mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding agreement with the Local Government, the School District and the Applicant that specifically details mitigation any mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school concurrence requirements. A SCADL described in Section 14.5(c) of this Agreement, constitutes final agency action by the School District for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S. 14.6 Appeal Process. A person may appeal a determination made as a part of the schoolconcurrencv process. (a) (b) F.S. process identified in the Local Government's regulations for appeal of development orders. This shall not apply to any decision subject to section a above. 32 Words underlined are added; words skaskipreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Section 15. Special Provisions 15.1 School District Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the School District is or may be subject to the requirements of the Florida and United States Constitutions and other state or federal statutes regarding the School District's performance of its constitutional or statutory obligation 15.2 Section 16. Resolution of Disputes If the Parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any issue relative to this Agreement and within which they may be in disagreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, FIAFidA Statutes F.S., or any other acceptable means of alternative dispute resolution agreed to by the Parties to this Agreement Section 4817. Amendment and Termination of the Agreement Agreement. This Agreement may only be amended by written consent of all parties to Section 4418. Execution of the Agreement This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument and be the Agreement between the parties. Section 4519. E*p4atienTermination of the Agreement. No party to this Agreement may terminate its participation in the agreement except (a) 33 Words underlined are added; words skask ihreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Affairs: or (b) Upon receipt of a waiver from the Department of Community Affairs per Section 163.31777(1)(c). F.S.: or (c) this Agreement. If the Florida Statutes as they pertain to school planning coordination and school concurrence are repealed, the Agreement may be terminated, in part or in full, by written consent of all parties to this Agreement. The tArFn at this AgFeement shall expiFe RiRety (90) days fFGFn the da4e the last paFt!' SeGtiE)R 14 06 exeGuted by the Parties pFiGF tO that ninety (90) day peNed— The DG.A. %vill Section 20. Entire Agreement. contemporaneous negotiations, understandings and agreements, written or oral, among the parties, with the exception of that certain ILA commonly referred to as the "SBR Agreement" referred to in Subparagraph 12.3.a herein. Section 21. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be March 1, 2008. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Agreement has been executed by the Parties by their duly authorized officials on the date set forth below. 34 Words underlined are added; words skulk- thRugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, FLORIDA 35 Words underlined are added; words sNasktpreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 36 Words underlined are added; words 64U& thMugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) -- DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EVERGLADES CITY, FLORIDA, THIS Day of 200_ CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY, FLORIDA IIn Attest (Seal) Clerk Duly Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Everglades City, Florida, this Day of 200_ 37 Words underlined are added; words struck- iHreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA, THIS Day of 200. CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA Signed: By: Attest (Seal) Clerk Duly Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Marco Island, Florida, this Day of 200_. 38 Words underlined are added; words StFUG k 414FOUgh are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, THIS Day of 200_. CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA a Attest (Seal) Clerk Duly Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Naples, Florida, this Day of 200_. 39 Words underlined are added; words sHUek44Feu0 are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX "A" Concurrency Service Area Map Series 12 -04-07 Underline ILA.doc a ca e d m v m y T V C 7 V C O U 6 O L V N R r C d E m W v a° s' 0 N I m v a° s' 0 N CL a 2 cc m d v L m a L' L c> C O U O O L N U) d 'O .6 2 v d d c c c r� 0 v 0 2v a R R d L Q d v L d N T C d t 7 O C O V O O L U L Ol Ma d d c� e v c 0 v 0 N APPENDIX "B" School District Student Generation Multiplier Data: Three datasets were used to calculate the student aeneration rates. These datasets were October 2006 student enrollment data, parcel data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Student Data - The student population poll used in this study is from October 2006. Among the information collected in the poll is the student's current physical address (as indicated by the student). These addresses have been geocoded (geographically matched) to the Collier County address points. The aeocodina procedure results in a spatial dataset that represents one geographic point per student, based on their address. study was obtained from the CCPA in December 2006. The Florida Department of Revenue the basis for determining housing type in this study. database was obtained from Collier County GIS in December 2006. Methodology: GIS was the business tool of choice for the analysis of student generation rates. The SGR is calculated as the number of students living in a specific housing category divided by the total number of units in the same specific housing unit type. This study examines students by their grade range and housing type. enouah to offset occasional housina type assionment errors. Words underlined are added; words s�elt dife"h are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) that creates one geographic point per student (similar to an X Y location) based on their Code. In order to append this DOR Code to the student point dataset a spatial loin was Government. The total number of each type of housina unit serves as the denominator in the SGR address points. This database contains one address point for every physical address what provides the denominator for the SGR calculations for each housing type Analysis and Results: • Elementary: Pre - Kindergarten — Fifth • Middle: Sixth — Eighth • High: Ninth — Twelfth Words underlined are added; words S"WE tlxeagh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Table 1: DOR Code, Student Count, and Housing Type Breakdown Table 2 displays the number of students by housing type and school type in Collier County as of October 2006. In addition to those students that are summarized in Table 2 a total of 1,053 students were assianed to a vacant parcel (DOR Code O). 24 students were geocoded to a miscellaneous parcel. This is due to a number of factors, including parcels that were once Table 3 displays the housina type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 4 details the resulting Student Generation Rate multiplier by unit type and school Words underlined are added; words strdek dwough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) ` acantResidentiall 1.05 v nl di "tai ut mong the five h u in kVDeS 1 Sin le Familv Residential Multi-Familv 10 units or more Retirement Homes 7 598 111 18 Sin le Famil Multi - Famil ulti - Famil 1 Multi - Famil less th n 10 units ricultural 329 9 ulti - Famil Single Famil 2 ricultural 18 Sin le Family 0 ri ultural 7 Sin le Family 6 ricultural 8 Single Family 7 ricultural 110 Sin le Family 9 ricultural 5 Sin le Family 1 Institutional 3 Multi - Famil 5 Institutional 30 Multi-Family 9 In tit ti nal 9 4 Multi -F mil Non -A ric Itur I Acrea a 123 Sin le Famil Table 2 displays the number of students by housing type and school type in Collier County as of October 2006. In addition to those students that are summarized in Table 2 a total of 1,053 students were assianed to a vacant parcel (DOR Code O). 24 students were geocoded to a miscellaneous parcel. This is due to a number of factors, including parcels that were once Table 3 displays the housina type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 4 details the resulting Student Generation Rate multiplier by unit type and school Words underlined are added; words strdek dwough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Woe. Table 2: Students by Housing Type and School Type Table 3: Dwelling Units by Type I Single Family Multi -Famil Condo /Co -O Mobile Homes Government 73,517 18,183 757 110,155 11,715 Table 4: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates Discussion: scnool z:ivstem. Because the oroiection of the number of students that will be generated from new residential Words underlined are added; words srmek dwougM are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX "C" School Concurrency Process Flow Chart Applicant receives written notice specifying defirienclec Applicant vrithdraws application School Nor" Issues School Capacity AvallabMgy Local Cedilkale a Pubic C FadAly : Adecl X all Level d ;erypectandmds are met i School Capacity AvWbday Delerminellon Leder veAd 1v the Ale d the CerlllY:Ne { of Pudic FacllY Adl.. (17104107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) CAPACITY AYALABLF School Dlslrbt Issues School Capacity Mailability Determination Letter identifying 15WorMnq deGCierrymc,,a, ity Applicant, Local AppkorlvNh — AAitigatlon option rejected School District issues a Scil runcurrercy Delkimp Leiter LocalLOCaI G denies application M. Words underlined me added; words s§aek theeagk are deleted 110 CAPACITY AVAIL All[ F Applicant subrMS notice a1 appeat with I.00W GavarrrnerA a SGwd Board, as appYcebb Appeal revlened and scheduled for hearing by the Board or Hearing Officer i The Board or _ Appeal to Cacult Corn APPENDIX "D" Suggested Calendar of Events March The SWG shall be notified of the date of the School Board Plan. April School District's transmittal of the draft financially feasible April or Mav Local governments' comments if any, on the School District's District staff no less than two weeks prior to the scheduled School Board Workshop. April and/or May The School District staff, with the assistance of Collier County L,ommissloners. comment. September 1 The County and Cities shall provide the School District the report on annual growth and development trends September 1 The County and Cities will provide to the School District the allocation of residential units by type and planning sector. September 30 School District shall update and adopt the financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan effective on October 1 Words underlined are added; words stmalk thmugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) October Collier County staff, with the assistance of School District staff, will dive an informational presentation of the County's Annual Update and Inventory Report to the District School Board of Collier County. November 1 The School District shall submit to the County and Cities the final Tentative Educational Facilities Plan and adopted financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. Comprehensive Plans the School District's annually adopted financially feasible Capital Improvement Plan, specifically the "Summary of Capital Improvements Prooram" and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Tables. Words underlined are added; words stmek tPAsuglr are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) EXHIBIT A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT DECEMBER, 2007 Words underlined are added; words stFwGkthFeu@h are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) TABLE OF CONTENTS Goal. Objectives and Policies Appendix A Map Series Words underlined are added; words GtFUSk threugh are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Pape 2 12 GOAL. OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT FEASIBLE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL PLAN. capacity at an adopted level of service standard, measured within School Concurrence Policy 1.1.1: CSAs. Policy 1.1.2: School CSAs shall be established less than district -wide through the merger of Traffic Policy 1.1.3: A. The adopted LOS standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five -year planning period: and B. The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs, court approved desegregation plans and other relevant factors. Policy 1.1.4: The County, in conjunction with the School District and municipalities within the County shall observe the followina process for modifying CSA boundary maps: A. The School District, in coordination with local governments shall review the proposed CSA boundaries and the data and analysis used to support the Words underlined are added; words siwsk- through are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) data and analysis to the local government for review and comment C. If the proposed change is acceptable to the local government the change to a Policy 1.1.5: A. At such time as the School District determines that a change in the school facility governments for review and comment. B_ . Local governments shall review and comment on the proposed changes within forty -five (45) days of receipt. OBJECTIVE 1.2: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The County, in cooperation with the School District shall ensure a school concurrency each school type as measured within a CSA. capacity to serve the development. Policy 1.2.2: The County shall consider the following residential uses exempt from the requirements of school concurrence: A. Single family and mobile home lots of record existing as of March 1 2008 B. Any new residential development that has a final plat or site plan approval or the Words underlined are added; words 64uek thFaugh are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) functional equivalent of a site specific development order as of March 1. 2008. (e.g., single- family to multi - family). D. Age- restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18. Exemption of an ape- restricted community will be subject to a restrictive covenant limiting the age of permanent residents to 18 years and older. of school impact fees. F. Development that has been authorized as a Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380. F.S., as of March 1, 2008, notwithstanding any subsequent abandonment of prior development of regional impact status. Policy 1.2.3: The County, through its land development regulations, and in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a school concurrence review process for all residential development projects that are not exempt under Policy 1.2.2. of this Element. The minimum process requirements are as follows: I_� B. The County determines if the application is complete for processing and transmits the complete SIA to the School District for review. C. The School District reviews the application for available capacity and issues a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter ( SCADL) to the County stating: 1. If capacity is available within the affected CSA. the School District shall issue a SCADL verifying available capacity. 2. 3. 4. If capacity is not available in the contiguous CSAs, the School District shall mitigation plan within a 90 day period. Words underlined are added; words siwsk thFOugh are deleted 4 (17104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) non - exempt resigennai protects Policy 1.2.4: A. Mitiaation options may include, but are not limited to: C. 1. 9 I Donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative learning facility; or 4. Renovation of existing buildings for use as learning facilities or 5. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations or core capacity; or 6. Construction of a public school facilitv in arivanra of tha times cat fnrth it verltving avaliame capacity to support the development Words underlined are added; words stFuGk4hFeuO are deleted (12104107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) OBJECTIVE 1.3: establish a monitoring group; and address coordination on emergency preparedness issues. timina of, on -site and off-site improvements necessary to support new schools, proposed expansions, construction that chances the primary use of a facility, stadium construction, or Policy 1.3.2: responsible for the planning, constructing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure improvements necessary to support a new school or school improvement, and ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place prior to or concurrent with school construction. Policy 1.3.3: land uses. County staff shall consider standards such as, but not limited to. building Policy 1.3.4: for these facilities is identified. A separate agreement between the School District and the County or other appropriate entity, will be developed for each instance of co- location and Policy 1.3.5: The County, municipalities within the County, and the School District shall coordinate on emergency preparedness issues. Policy 1.3.6: The County, in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a Citizen Advisory Group (CAG) to monitor plannino and school concurrence in Collier County. Words underlined are added; words straek- tpreugFi are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) slanparg Tor scnools. Pollcv 1.4.2: The County, in conjunction with the School District shall annually review the Public School /A B. A map or maps which identify the general location and type of public school series. Words underlined are added; words siraskihMugh are deleted % (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX A MAP SERIES Words underlined are added; words struslEiMeugh are deleted (12104107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added; words straektpreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added; words are deleted 10 (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................ ............................... 1 PURPOSEOF REPORT ............................................................................ ..............................1 COUNTY INFORMATION (POPULATION / TRENDS) ......................... ............................... 3 POPULATIONPROJECTIONS .................................................................. ..............................3 HOUSING............................................................................................. ..............................4 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - GROWTH AREAS ................................... ..............................4 EXISTING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS ........................ ............................... 9 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT, FACILITY CAPACITY, AND EXISTING UTILIZATION .........................9 EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITES .......................................................... ............................... 10 STUDENT GENERATION RATES ......................................................... ............................... 15 PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS .................... ............................... 21 PROJECTEDENROLLMENT ................................................................. ............................... 21 PROJECTED CAPACITY ...................................................................... ............................... 26 10 AND 20 YEAR FORECAST ............................................................ ............................... 29 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ..................................................... ............................... 32 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS FOR COLLIER COUNTY ...... ............................... 32 LEVELOF SERVICE ....................................................................................... ............................... 39 SCHOOL LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR COLLIER COUNTY ........................ ............................... 39 CO- LOCATION AND JOINT -USE ANALYSIS ............................... ............................... 42 MUTUAL USE AGREEMENTS .............................................................. ............................... 43 SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND REVENUE SOURCES .............................. 45 SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ................................... ............................... 45 SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE SOURCES ............................................... .............................50 SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND SCHOOL PLANNING SHARED COSTS ........ 52 SCHOOL DISTRICT'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY .................. ............................... 53 APPENDICIES................................................................. ............................... 54 STUDENT GENERATION RATES - APPENDIX 1 .................................. ............................... 55 IMPACT FEE STUDY STUDENT GENERATION RATES - APPENDIX 2 ... ............................... 56 CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA (CSA) CREATION METHODOLOGY- APPENDIX 3 ............. 58 ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY MAPS- APPENDIX 4 ................................... ............................... 63 Collier County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: POPULATION TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ........................ 3 TABLE 2: PERCENTAGE GROWTH OF POPULATION TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ................................................. ............................... 3 TABLE 3: HOUSING TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ........................... 4 TABLE 4: PERCENTAGE GROWTH OF HOUSING TRENDS ................. ............................... 4 TABLE 5: PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENT .................................. ............................... 9 TABLE 6: COMPARISON OF POPULATION GROWTH AND NEW HOUSING TO HIGH SCHOOL PLANNING AREA ENROLLMENT IN 2006 ................... ............................... 10 TABLE 7: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL TYPE .......................... 10 TABLE 8: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL .. ............................... 12 TABLE 9: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SPECIAL SCHOOL TYPE ................ 14 TABLE 10: DOR CODE, STUDENT COUNT, AND HOUSING TYPE BREAKDOWN ..................... 18 TABLE 11: STUDENTS BY HOUSING TYPE AND SCHOOL TYPE ........ ............................... 19 TABLE 12: DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE ................................... ............................... 19 TABLE 13: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY STUDENT GENERATION RATES ........... 19 TABLE 14: DOE COFTE FORECAST ...................................... ............................... 23 TABLE 15: PROPOSED NEW SCHOOLS AND ADDITIONS THROUGH 2011 -12 ..................... 27 TABLE 16: 10 -YEAR SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT FORECAST .... ............................... 30 TABLE 17:10 -YEAR RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY BY COUNTY PLANNINGAREA ............................................... ............................... 30 TABLE 18: 20 -YEAR SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT FORECAST .... ............................... 30 TABLE 19: 20 -YEAR RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY BY COUNTY PLANNINGAREA ............................................... ............................... 31 TABLE 20: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN .................. ............................... 34 TABLE 21: MIDDLE SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN ........................ ............................... 35 TABLE 22: HIGH SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN ........................... ............................... 35 TABLE 23: LEVEL OF SERVICE BY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA ......................... 41 TABLE 24: SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, FY 2007/08 - 2011/12 .................... 46 TABLE 25: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE, FY 2007/08 — 2011/12 ........................ 51 Collier County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TRENDS: 2001 AND 2006 .. ............................... 6 FIGURE 1A: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TRENDS RELATIVE TO STUDENT LOCATION: 2001 AND 2006 ............................................................................................. ............................... 7 FIGURE 2: APPROVED AND POTENTIAL NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ........................... 8 FIGURE 3: EXISTING SCHOOL AND ANCILARY FACILITIES MAP ....... ............................... 13 FIGURE 4: PROJECTED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011-2012 ............. 25 FIGURE 5: PROJECTED MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011 -2012 ................... 25 FIGURE 6: PROJECTED HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011 -2012 ...................... 25 FIGURE 7: FUTURE SCHOOLS AND ANCILARY FACILITIES MAP ........ ............................... 28 FIGURE 8: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS .. ............................... 36 FIGURE 9: MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ........ ............................... 37 FIGURE 10: HIGH SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ......... ............................... 38 FIGURE 11: PUBLIC FACILITIES WITH SCHOOL CO- LOCATION OPPORTUNITIES MAP ............ 44 Collier County Public School Facilities Element iv Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 :........ DRAFT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING ATTACHMENT 2: ............................................................. EDUCATIONAL PLANT SURVEY ATTACHMENT 3:.... DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ATTACHMENT 4:........... SCHOOL IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL REPORT - COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Coiner County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Introduction Public schools are essential components to the well -being and future of a community. Residential development occurring within the community is the primary factor associated with student population growth within a public school system. Because of the relationship between residential development and the provision of public schools, coordination among the District School Board of Collier County (School District), Collier County, and the Municipalities of Collier County is critical to ensure that public school capacity needs for future student growth can be met within the public school system. Recognizing the importance of public schools, the 2005 Florida Legislature enacted legislation amending Sections 163.3180 and 163.3177, Florida Statutes (F.S.), mandating the implementation of public school concurrency supported by data and analysis. This Data and Analysis Report has been created in accordance with the requirements of 163.3177(12) (c), F.S. and 9J- 5.025(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), to detail the methods and analyze the results of the study that have been employed to support the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) for the School Concurrency Program. The School District, along with Collier County and the municipalities of Everglades City, Marco Island, and Naples are working together, participating in school concurrency. Purpose of Report The Data and Analysis for the PSFE addresses land development, economic, and demographic issues which impact education. These issues include: County growth and population trends; school level of service; school utilization; school proximity and compatibility with residential development; availability of public infrastructure; co- location opportunities for school and public infrastructure; and financial feasibility. Each affected local government must adopt a consistent Public School Facilities Element. This Report will provide Collier County, Everglades City, Marco Island, and Naples with the required data and analysis necessary to adopt a public school concurrency program consistent with the amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning (Attachment A), Subsection 93- 5.025(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and Chapter 163, F.S. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 1 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The data and analysis provided for the PSFE establishes the coordination between the school board, local governments, and county necessary for planning and permitting residential development to ensure that school capacity is available at the adopted level of service for schools prior to or concurrent with the student impact from residential development. comer County Public School Facilities Element 2 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Population Using the Collier County 2006 Population Estimates and Projection methodology, population data were collected for the City of Naples, City of Marco Island and Everglades City, in addition to the unincorporated areas of Collier County. Data sources include the 1990 US Census, and the populations and projections compiled by Collier County for the years 2000- 2025. The population figures and projections from Collier County are those from the 2006 October count, and are based on the County's methodology for projecting population, as of October 2006. In the future, population projection figures from Collier County will continue to be supplied to the School District, using whichever methodology the County is using at that time. These data are shown below in Table 1. From 1990 to 2000, the Collier County population increased by 59 percent, and increased 21 percent from 2000 -2005. Projections indicate a 23 percent increase from 2005 to 2010, a 17 percent increase from 2010 to 2015, an increase of 15 percent from 2015 to 2020, and an increase of 13 percent from 2020 to 2025, displayed in Table 2 below. Based on the figures provided, the overall population of the County is expected to increase by over 350,000 persons between 2005 and 2025. Table 1: Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities 2000-2025 Data obtained from Cullerr County Comprehensive Planning Department (October data, 2006 Population Estimates and Projections) Table 2: Percentage Growth of Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Un rp incoorated Collier County 122,500 221,139 287,511 382,122 464,770 549,892 636,431 City ofNaples 19,505 21,332 22,779 24,470 25,742 26,760 27,345 City of Marco Island 9,773 14,973 15,737 16,641 17,590 18,592 19,652 Everglades City 321 484 578 912 947 983 1,021 Countywide Total 152,099 257,926 326,605 424,145 509,049 596,227 684,449 2000-2025 Data obtained from Cullerr County Comprehensive Planning Department (October data, 2006 Population Estimates and Projections) Table 2: Percentage Growth of Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities Collier County Public School Facilities Element 3 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 1990 -2000 2000 -2005 2005 2010 2010 -2015 2015 -2020 Unincorporated Collier County 55% 23% 25% 18% 15% City of Naples _ _ 9% 6% 7% 5% 4% N2% City ofMarco Island 35% 5% 5% 5% 5 °/p Eve lades CI 34% 16% 37 °/p 4 °/p 4% Coun ideTotal 59% 21% 23% 17% 15% Collier County Public School Facilities Element 3 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Housing The housing data published in 2006 were collected for the City of Naples, City of Marco Island and Everglades City, and the unincorporated areas of Collier County. The data source for occupied units is the University of Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing. This data provides a more useful dataset than figures for total housing units, owing to the large number of seasonal -use housing units. In total, Collier County doubled its occupied housing between the years 1990 -2005. The municipalities show consistent growth during the same time frame. The data in Tables 3 and 4 represent existing occupied units for 1990 -2005. The Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing projects the occupied unit counts for 2010 -2025. Table 3: Housing Trends for Collier County and Municipalities uara oorameo rrom me unrversrty or ronoa mmmnerg cemer ror arroraaore Housing Table 4: Percentage Growth of Housing Trends 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 1 2020 2025 Unincorporated Collier Not 84 104,971 125,072 145,843 168,095 190,293 County Available ,678 6.8% 6.3% City of Marco Island Not Available 4.5% City of Naples 9,808 10,785 11,682 12,421 13,297 14,271 15,227 AvNot 7,128 7.461 7,869 8,851 9,548 10,177 City of Marco Island Everglades City 72 182 234 294 341 387 440 Countywide Total 61,576 102,773 124,348 145,656 168,332 192,301 216,137 uara oorameo rrom me unrversrty or ronoa mmmnerg cemer ror arroraaore Housing Table 4: Percentage Growth of Housing Trends Residential Development - Growth Areas Certificate of Occupancy (CO) data was analyzed to identify where past areas of growth were located in relation current growth areas. Figure 1 displays data regarding the quantity of COs issued within unincorporated Collier County, as well as the municipalities, for the years 2001 and 2006. This snapshot of CO data shows that over time, more COs are being issued in the eastern and southern portions of the County, particularly south and east of Davis Boulevard and east toward Immokalee Road. Areas such as Golden Gate Estates and those within the more rural eastern portion of Collier County are also experiencing a larger Collier County Public School Facilities Element q Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 1990 -2000 2000 -2005 2015-201012010-2015 2015 -2020 2020 -2025 Unincorporated Collier County Not Available 19.3% 16.1% 14.2% 13.2% 11.7% Citl ofNaples 91% 7.7% 5.9% 6.6% 6.8% 6.3% City of Marco Island Not Available 4.5% 5.2% 11.1% 7.3% 6.2% Everglades City 60.4% 22.2% 20.4% 13.8% 11.9% 12.0% Countywide Total 40.1% 17.4% 14.6% 13.5% 12.5% 11.0% Residential Development - Growth Areas Certificate of Occupancy (CO) data was analyzed to identify where past areas of growth were located in relation current growth areas. Figure 1 displays data regarding the quantity of COs issued within unincorporated Collier County, as well as the municipalities, for the years 2001 and 2006. This snapshot of CO data shows that over time, more COs are being issued in the eastern and southern portions of the County, particularly south and east of Davis Boulevard and east toward Immokalee Road. Areas such as Golden Gate Estates and those within the more rural eastern portion of Collier County are also experiencing a larger Collier County Public School Facilities Element q Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 number of CO's being issued. Additionally, Figure IA compares the locations of students in 2001 and 2006 to the locations of issued COs in those years. The figure indicates that the issuance of a CO does not necessarily correspond to the presence of new students, which is likely due to the construction of second or seasonal dwellings, or age- restricted communities. Growth in Collier County is expected to continue, particularly in the more rural areas of the County. The new town of Ave Maria, which has been approved for 11,000 units, is an example of a large Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in such a rural area. Figure 2 depicts the locations of the approved and new potential residential developments. Figure 2 also provides a table showing the quantity of residential units yet to be built among the 129 approved residential developments. These data were obtained from the County and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC). The developments described and shown in this figure represent existing DRI and planned unit developments (PUDs) with build -out dates of 2007 and later. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 5 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 School Enrollment, Facility Capacity, and Existing Utilization During the last eight years, the Collier County School District has grown by 10,000 students, from 32,000 in 1999 to more than 42,000 in 2006. During that same time period the School District built 12 new schools. Table 5 shows the enrollment pattern for students in District -owned buildings since 2000. Enrollment reflects the October membership count. Table 5: Public School Enrollment October Membership Elementary Middle High Total Annual Growth 2000 17,389 7,538 8,949 33,876 2001 18,204 8,052 9,645 35,901 2,025 2002 18,523 8,431 10,303 37,257 1,356 2003 19,315 8,851 10,882 39,048 1,791 2004 20,524 1 9,173 11,608 41,305 2,257 2005 20,741 8,913 12,218 41,872 567 2006 20,433* 8,886 12,633 42,063* 191 *District -owned facilities - including Internet High School and Walker Career and Technical School Between 2000 and 2005 the district was growing at an average rate of approximately 1,500 new students a year. In 2006 the School District, like many other Florida school districts, experienced a slight decline in student enrollment in the elementary and middle grades (subsequent decline in the high schools shows a net decline for the year). The swift rise in median home prices, more investors in the housing market, an increase in the number of rental conversions to condominiums, and a larger second -home market share are some of the changes that have an impact on student enrollment. It remains to be seen if this drop in enrollment is the beginning of a trend, or simply an anomaly. An analysis of the 2006 published housing data in Collier County points to similar building permit activity as in the past, but fewer new students associated with them. The exception is in the Palmetto Ridge High School Service Area where most of the enrollment growth is occurring. Table 6 compares high school enrollment change with population and housing changes in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element g Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 6: Comparison of Population Growth and New Housing to High School Planning Area Enrollment in 2006 High School Planning Area Population Growth (2006) New Dwelling Units (2006) 2006 PK -12 Enrollment Change Baron Collier HS 1,428 692 -295 Gulf Coast HS 1,748 980 -80 Lely HS 2,299 1,545 -121 Naples HS 354 218 -32 Golden Gate HS 434 332 -289 Palmetto Ridge HS 2,571 856 396 Other 251 88 116 Total 9,084 4,711 -305 ,,,, , .,..,— , o,,,, .. c, ..al cci anu 1mr,mcai �cnooi Due to an aggressive building plan for the preceding six years, the school district has been able to keep pace with growth at the middle and high school levels. Only the elementary schools continue to face a deficit in 2006. Table 7 compares the capacity to enrollment by school type in 2006. Table 7: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by School Type School Type Enrollment 106 (October FTE) Capacity '05-06 (Permanent FISH) Utilization High Schools 12,633 13,822 91% Middle Schools 8,886 9,618 92% Elementary School 20,433 19,056 107% u,cwucc inieinet iuyn Suluoi ana warner l.areer ana /ecnnlcdl This county -wide data, however, conceals regional differences where some schools are over capacity and others are under capacity. In 2006, 11 elementary schools, two middle schools and one high school exceeded 100 percent utilization. Currently, the School District has more than 200 relocatable classrooms to address both capacity and program needs. Existing School Facilities The School District operates 24 elementary schools, 9 middle schools, 8 high schools, and one PK -12 school with nearly 50 percent having been built since 1990. It is able to dedicate Collier County Public School Facilities Element 10 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 25 -30 percent of its capital improvement program to the renovation and upgrading of existing facilities. In addition, the School District implements a well conceived and transparent facilities maintenance program. As a result, most school buildings are in good condition and often exceed state guidelines. Table 8 shows the public schools, the year each was built and its site size, and the 2006 enrollment utilization. In addition, the existing location of the schools and ancillary facilities operated by the School District has been provided as Figure 3. Grade Structure: Most schools in the School District follow a standard grade organization with Grades PK -5 in the elementary schools, Grades 6 -8 in the middle schools, and grades 9 -12 in the high school. There are two exceptions. In Immokolee (a geographically isolated community), the elementary schools will begin serving grades PK - 6 in 2007. In Everglades City (also a geographically isolated incorporated community) all grades (K -12) are served at one school. In 2006, Manatee Middle School temporarily housed elementary students pending the opening of a new school in 2007. A 2002 statewide ballot initiative allowed voluntary attendance in a prekindergarten (PK) preparatory program for children living in Florida who turn four years old by September 1. Permanent FISH Capacity: School districts in Florida calculate FISH (Florida Inventory of School Houses) based on state guidelines. FISH is defined as "the number of students that may be housed in a facility (school) at any given time based on a utilization percentage of the number of existing satisfactory student stations." The figure is a product of the number of classrooms at a school and the student stations assigned to each room type. FISH is the design capacity for the school building (as built) and may not reflect actual usage. It is not uncommon for a school to be at or even below permanent FISH capacity and still need relocatables to address program needs, such as for preschool education, Exceptional Student Education (ESE), English as a Second Language (ESL), or Title One reduced class sizes. Collier County Public School Facilities Element SI Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Table 8: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by School School Name Year Opened site Slze (Acres) 20OV06 perm Ca ac! 2006 Enrollment Utlllzatlon High Schools Barron Collier HS 1977 98.00 1946 1778 91% Everglades City School (PK -12) 1996 4.00 481 152 32% Golden Gate HS 2003 63.00 2166 1527 709/6 Gulf Coast HS 1996 42.00 1955 2132 109% Immokalee HS 1973 44.00 1737 1435 83% Lely HS 1973 50.00 2216 1540 69% Naples HS 1959 33.00 2047 1683 82% Palmetto Ridge HS 2003 135.00 2175 1877 91% Middle Schools - Corkscrew MS 1999 60.00 1067 1459 137% East Naples MS 1968 17.00 1058 1235 117% Golden Gate MS 1982 27.00 848 847 100% Gulfview MS 1994 11.00 657 616 94% Immokalee MS 1990 24.00 1310 1138 87% Manatee MS* 1993 46.00 1328 843 63% North Naples MS 2003 43.00 984 920 93% Oakridge MS 1992 39.00 ii 1323 1142 869/6 Pine Ridge MS 1973 37.00 1075 1 1066 999% Elementary Schools Avalon ES 1968 --- 1 .00 466 558 120% Big Cypress ES 1986 20.00 701 960 137% Calusa Park ES 2001 33.00 775 1055 136% Corkscrew ES 1998 60.00 901 941 104% Estates ES 2003 8.00 767 714 93% Golden Gate ES 1973 16.00 1145 872 769% Golden Terrace ES 1988 15.00 1326 1013 76% Highlands ES 1965 13.00 466 675 145% Lake Park ES 1989 10.00 562 535 95% Lake Trafford ES 1989 876 98% Laurel Oak ES 1992 1200 160% Lely ES 1989 861 93% Manatee ES* 1993 796 105% Naples Park ES 1973 122Osceola ES 2001 892 121% Pelican Marsh ES 1995 20.00 974 832 85% Pinecrest ES 1962 20.00 690 703 102% Poinciana ES 1973 19.00 834 718 86% Sabal Palm ES 2002 31.00 750 990 132% Sea Gate ES 1964 15.00 628 752 120% Shadowlawn ES 1959 1200 . 657 638 97% Tommie Barfield ES 1972 21.00 600 721 120% Village Oaks ES 1986 20.00 692 624 90% Vineyards ES 1989 18.00 959 976 102% Collier County Public School Facilities Element 12 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 District -wide and Special Schools: In addition to the traditional school setting, the School District offers a variety of alternative programs. Some of these programs provide non - institutional settings, smaller class sizes, interagency services, or special curricula. They are typically targeted to students with disciplinary problems, truancy, drug offenses, or violent or unmotivated behavior. In addition, the district offers career and technical choice schools as alternatives to the traditional high school model. All of these schools are district -wide through student choice or special assignment. Table 9 lists the existing schools and programs. Table 9: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by Special School Type *Programs are located in both Naples and Immokalee ** New buildings in 2008 Charter Schools: Currently, there are two charter schools in Collier County. Marco Island Charter School serves approximately 360 middle school students and Immokolee Community School is serving 180 elementary school students. Collier County Public Schools constructed a new building for the March Island Charter School which opened in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 14 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 District School /Program Owned Program Grade Max. Facility Enrollment Beacon High School Yes Online High School Grades 9 -12 400 Career and Technology High School (III) ** at the Yes Career High School Grades 9 -12 400 Lorenzo Walker Campus Immokolee Career and ** Yes Career High School Grades 9 -12 600 Technology Campus JJJ Big Cypress Wilderness No Moderate to High Grades 7 -12 35 Institute Risk Youths Collier Juv. Detention No Juvenile Justice Grades 3 -12 50 Enhanced Assist* Yes Out -of- School Grades 6 -12 As required at Suspension 15:1 ratio New Beginnings* Yes Drop-out Prevention Grades 4 -12 90 Pace No At -Risk Girls Grades 6 -12 35 Phoenix Program* Yes In lieu of expulsion Grades 6 -12 120 Sunshine School No Adolescent Grades 1 -12 20 Psychiatric Unit Teenage Parenting Pregnant Teen / Teen 160 teen parents Program* Yes Parent Grades Vary 140 children of teen parents *Programs are located in both Naples and Immokalee ** New buildings in 2008 Charter Schools: Currently, there are two charter schools in Collier County. Marco Island Charter School serves approximately 360 middle school students and Immokolee Community School is serving 180 elementary school students. Collier County Public Schools constructed a new building for the March Island Charter School which opened in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 14 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Student Generation Rates Public School Concurrency provides coordinated planning between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, the municipalities of Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Naples, and the District School Board of Collier County to ensure that school capacity is available at the time of impact of residential development. Currently, the School District utilizes the Florida Department of Education's (DOE) five -year, countywide projections that are updated annually. These projections are valuable, but do not provide a breakdown of the enrollment to the individual school level. The Student Generation Rate (SGR) multipliers developed by this study will provide the level of detail which will be used to accurately project the student growth that can be anticipated from a new residential development at the time of its regulatory review. Data: Three datasets were used to calculate the student generation rates. These datasets were the October 2006 student enrollment data, parcel data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's office, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) address points as provided by the Collier County GIS department. Student Data - The student population poll used in this study is from October 2006. Among the information collected in the poll is the student's current physical address (as indicated by the student). These addresses have been geocoded (geographically matched) to the Collier County address points. The geocoding procedure results in a spatial dataset that represents one geographic point per student, based on their address. Cadastral Data - The Collier County Property Appraiser (CCPA) maintains a cadastral parcel database for Collier County. CCPA maintains the county's tax parcel information in a GIS database that is updated and released on a regular basis. The GIS parcel database used in this study was obtained from the CCPA in December 2006. The Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Property Classification Code (commonly known as a DOR Code) is assigned at the Property Appraiser's office to each parcel in the county's database. The DOR Code represents and serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. Address Point Data - The Collier County GIS department maintains a database that contains one address point for each valid physical address within Collier County. The address point database was obtained from Collier County GIS in December 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element is Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Methodology: GIS was the business tool of choice for the analysis of student generation rates. The SGR is calculated as the number of students living in a specific housing category divided by the total number of units in the same specific housing unit type. This study examines students by their grade range and housing type. The sample size for this study is the entirety of Collier County, based on student location. The total student population used for this study was 41,502. The School District has a small population of students that do not live within the County boundary, yet attend Collier County Public Schools. These students were not included as part of this SGR analysis, as they live in other surrounding counties. Therefore, the student population used in the multiplier analysis is smaller than the total October 2006 student enrollment population as provided by the School District. The size of the dataset used in this study was large enough to offset occasional housing type assignment errors. The student data file, provided by the School District, was geocoded (geographically matched) to the Collier County address points GIS layer. The geocoding procedure results in a spatial dataset that creates one geographic point per student (similar to an X, Y location), based on their address. The geocoded student dataset does not contain information relating to housing types. The housing category data is present in the CCPA parcel database in the form of the DOR Code. In order to append this DOR Code to the student point dataset, a spatial join was performed. A spatial join is a specific type of spatial analysis whereby the attribute data from one dataset is joined to the attribute data of another dataset based on spatial location. For this study, the parcel data was spatially joined to the student point data, resulting in one GIS point file that contains both student data and housing data from the property appraiser. The DOR Code is assigned to each parcel in the county's database at the CCPA office. The DOR Code serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. The spatial join allows each parcel's unique DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database to be appended to each student point. This allows the students to be classified into one of five housing unit type categories: Single Family, Multi - Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums and Co- Operatives, and Government. cower county Public School Facilities Element 16 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The total number of each type of housing unit serves as the denominator in the SGR calculations. The CCPA parcel database does not contain data regarding the number of housing units for each parcel. However, Collier County GIS maintains a database of physical address points. This database contains one address point for every physical address regardless of the number of parcels (i.e.: a multi - family with 50 units will contain 50 separate, unique addresses). The CCPA parcel database was therefore geoprocessed to determine the number of address points that fall within each parcel. This was accomplished by way of a spatial join using the CCPA parcel database and the Collier County GIS Address Points database. This spatial join creates one GIS file that contains the count of units per parcel. Through specific GIS Structured Query Language (SQL) the housing type and student grade range can be selected from this database. Once selected, the number of units is summarized and this is what provides the denominator for the SGR calculations, for each housing type. Detail of the specific GIS SQL used to identify these housing types can be found in Appendix 1. Analysis and Results: Student data was analyzed on two levels: grade range, and housing type. A student's grade range was determined by their current grade rank. The grade ranges used are as follows: • Elementary: Pre - Kindergarten - 5th • Middle: 6th - 8th • High: 9th - 12th The housing type was obtained from the DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database, and was generalized into five unit type categories. For a more detailed description of DOR codes, please refer to Appendix 2. Since Condominiums and Cooperatives are grouped together, some clarification is warranted to distinguish the difference between the two. The difference between Condominiums and Cooperatives is that a condominium owner actually owns the unit, and owns an undivided interest in the common areas like parking lots, recreations areas, lobbies and hallways. In a Cooperative, the resident does not own any real estate. Rather, they own shares in a not- for - profit corporation. As a shareholder they are afforded the right to lease space in the building. The corporation owns the common areas. Generally, a condominium is considered real property and a cooperative is considered intangible personal property. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 17 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 There are a total of five students that fall within the Cooperative category. Additionally, the condominium category includes condo - conversion properties (previously apartments) which have occurred through August 2006. Further, categories that fall within a commercial category and all categories that contain less than 10 student points were omitted from this analysis. The housing categories are broken down by DOR Code in Table 10. Table 10: DOR Code, Student Count, and Housing Type Breakdown DOR Use Code Use Code Descrlpdon Student Count Housing Type 0 Vacant Residential 1,053 Evenly distributed among the five housing types 1 Single Family Residential 27,598 Single Family 2, Mobile Homes 1.,424 Mobile Homes 3 Multi-Family 10 units or more 4,111 Multi - Family 4 Condominium /Homeowners 3,738 Condo /Co-0 5 Coo eratives 5 Condo /Co -Op 7 Retirement Homes _ 18 Multi - Family 8 Multi-Family less than 10 units 2,329 Multi - Family 28 ,., r. Mobile Flotrie Parks 729 ; Mobile Homes 51 A ricultural 79 Single Family 52 Agricultural 18 Single Family 60 Agricultural 27 Single Family 66 Agricultural 38 Single Family 67 Agricultural 39 Single Family 69 Agricultural 55 Single Family_ 71 - -- — Institutional - -- — 23 Multi- Family 75 — _Institutional 230_ Multi-Family 79 _ Institutional 29 Multi-Family 83 Government 19 Government 86 Government 106 Government 87 Government 46 Government 88 Government 733 Government 90 Government 97 Government 94 Miscellaneous 24 Evenly distributed among the five housing s 99 Non - Agricultural Acreage 123 Single Family Table 11 displays the number of students by housing type and school type in Collier County as of October 2006. In addition to those students that are summarized in Table 11, a total of 1,053 students were assigned to a vacant parcel (DOR Code 0), 24 students were geocoded to a miscellaneous parcel. These results are due to a number of factors, including parcels that were once vacant, which now have a structure on it, or an incorrectly geocoded collier County Public School Facilities Element 18 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 student record. This issue is addressed by equitably distributing these students across the five housing types. Table 11: Students by Housing Type and School Type Table 12 below displays the housing type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 12: Dwelling Units by Type Single Family Single Family Multi- Family Mobile Homes Condo /Co- O Government Elementary 11,919 3,704 1,190 1,678 492 Middle 7,063 1,462 435 867 207 High 8,942 1,574 476 1,191 302 Total 27,924 6,740 2,101 3,736 1,001 Table 12 below displays the housing type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 12: Dwelling Units by Type Single Family Multi- Family Mobile Homes Condo /Co O Government 73,517 18,183 10,155 84,757 1 1,715 Table 13 details the resulting Student Generation Rate multiplier by unit type and school type. An explanation in the differences between the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study SGR methodology and this methodology can be found in Appendix 2. Table 13: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates To determine the student impact of a proposed residential development for school concurrency purposes, a proposed development's projected number and type of unit are converted into the number of projected students within the specific Concurrency Service Area Boundary. Based on the Student Generation Rates in Table 13, for every 100 new Collier County Public School Facilities Element lg Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Single Family Multi - Family Mobile Homes Condo /Co -Op Government Elementary 0.16 0.20 0.12 0.02 0.29 Middle 0.10 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.12 High 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.18 Total 0.38 0.37 0.21 0.04 0.59 To determine the student impact of a proposed residential development for school concurrency purposes, a proposed development's projected number and type of unit are converted into the number of projected students within the specific Concurrency Service Area Boundary. Based on the Student Generation Rates in Table 13, for every 100 new Collier County Public School Facilities Element lg Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 single - family housing units constructed in Collier County, 38 PK -12 students will be generated, but only 16 elementary school students for the School District. Because the projection of the number of students that will be generated from new residential development is critical to the school concurrency process, a student generation multiplier was created using the student population, less those students who do not live within Collier County. Consequently, the number of students associated with a development can be calculated by applying the multiplier to the development's proposed number and type of residential housing units. comer county P IDIIC Scnool Facilities Element 20 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 - S - Projected Enrollment State COFTE: Around July of each year, the Florida DOE publishes grade by grade Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent ( COFTE) enrollment projections for every school district for the next 5 to 10 years. The State uses a standard 'cohort survival' method using five year enrollment trends. Table 14 identifies the pre -K through grade 12 DOE projected student growth through the school year 2010/11. This methodology is used nation -wide and is considered fairly reliable. Using the State's COFTE projections for concurrency planning poses several problems. First, the State's projections are based on an average of two 'head counts' - one in October and one in February. Therefore, the COFTE tends to under - project the number of high school students that show up in the fall by including winter drop -outs from the spring count. For facilities planning purposes the school district wants to insure that adequate classrooms are available for the peak fall semester and therefore prefers to use the October head count as the basis for planning. • Secondly, the State's forecast is not available until July of the upcoming year. However, using an October count, the School District is able to prepare a new forecast by January. Finally, the State's forecast does not count all of the students in the School District's buildings and includes others that are not in District -owned buildings. For example, the DOE forecast excludes students in special or alternative schools or homebound settings. The School District's enrollment for facilities planning purposes includes only students in regular schools. By contrast, the State's forecast includes only pre- kindergarten (Pre -K) students that are in special education (ESE), while the school district provides Pre -K programs for many non -ESE students. Five Year Forecast: The five year forecast is the basis for the school district's Plant Survey and Five Year Work Plan. The School District develops the data and analysis for the Work Plan in the spring for final approval by early September. Enrollment projections are prepared using the same Collier County Public School Facilities Element 21 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 standard cohort model, as the State using the State's birth projections. The School District prepares the projections school -by- school, and grade -by- grade, modifying information where boundary changes have affected trends or where staff has unique information of housing trends. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 22 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 M N C w E v w O/ L u r LL O O N O V L U D J VI rn u � Q � � I >�m C 0 Q u U o C � 0 � N N O N U 0 0 m ^OtOmNNrmmM �� O mum'imA� M �C� Q Q Q N Q O m QQVQQth 16M16 4 MhINYOI O)m mM NanuO'� MC'IMO WNN a O W N N N OEo r MraMOrMmmrrm�om rQrm QNO �i o �n �' � -oo NO m mM��QmMr�rNmNr MNMN�mmN -NO rw mo.- NNNM Mo �I+IMm N NN M m QQQQMMMI`]MQIh (+fNm QOMW � Q O a� m �mm�moN� NNmmmm MoNm mMO.- .00 y0 N (O QmQmoMmN MmMm m.- Molt/ m mm Yi M Q a to In O r �mm� rM N� M CQt7 C6,6 t7 tMMt+iM MfV N(U 0 NID r m Q N Q C5 N � C T3 '^o m mmNrnrQmmrQQMrrM -Ny Nr�M omo �L -am M m NN�-�MmMOmmU1T. MOmhmQMMMmmd'O (Om mNNQ NNOm 1f10 ee��O �MNIm DYi �O UON C; Q M(7 l6 M l7 l7(6 IV M M m NQ Q N d A 0 N u i+ H W £ IO V r (OMQOOMM(ON OJQ NIf QM �rNM MO�(yp M Mr NM N N NN W 7 r �i N C O m0 mMCr'o LL V d00 UN t7 t7 r)c7MMMlV C)CJ (7 (VNM OiNM Da Q L'. LLI LL LL a uj y F T tZ LL Q A N MO]mNOO�rmMmrlmmOl Of mr Qtn NONr N Q L Y m O m m OmOQQQ<nmMmmr(Ormr MM(6 M�-NrOOmMmMQ QNOr NO6MQ T rm r Om Y (� C!O �� N (6 MCM MC)C)lV thMM(7 [VN� O06 N1 CT W 4o mo O G v V n a �d R m NNOmmtONNQmMrIDmM MmNM C� In r1()NrVm�mrQm�O�O "NT M N r 0 0 m O N 0 N�MO 0 Q M N co CI .� N � j� N MM[nt�iMNMMMMMNlVO p)QJ—O 3C N d O U ° QOO =T a N N pCjL F U Q m r m O M N N m O N r O m m M mMQM.- QIVrCr�-•-mNm M N Mmm Nw o m ? Ld O N M N n O mNOQI O mm OO�M OIm NM y C M M M M M N M N CT N M N N , m m W O m '� d U M U U O) rNMmMNTMmmmNN. -r r0�� -r °C M o M N m��Nmmm�oaoomom N T m W m O) Ol O m r h m.-mN Nmrnm OQON i- v j N N ft/ (V N N IV (V (V N IV M IV IV r (O aD OJ O tO ti- U N M M V QO T� � � L 3 o Y N s N E m E 0 C a UY •- cN 2 w Yvvvv'�oavvvv9avY n lO Y N 10 0 W 0 0 U � c7 m ad � cT � cT � c2 7 cW � c150 cN �a c�a<omY a c7Y a loo>Y a � M N C w E v w O/ L u r LL O O N O V L U D J VI rn u � Q � � I >�m C 0 Q u U o C � 0 � N N O N U 0 0 In general, enrollment increases are expected to moderate for the next five years particularly in the middle and high school age groups. Figures 4 through 6 show projected enrollment through 2011 -12. Two changes are reflected in the elementary school graph - a slight decline in 2002 with the reduction in Pre -K programs, and an increase the following year due to a higher retention of students in the third grade. This planned retention of third grade students in 2003 echoes through the system into the middle schools in 2005. Enrollment in 2005 was less than in previous years because enrollment at the middle schools declined by more than 400 students. This is the result of the 'retained' students causing a one year change in the pattern. It is not a sign of long term growth but an anomaly that will move through the system and into the high schools in 2009. t,omer county Public School Facilities Element 24 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 23000 22000 21000 20000 19000 18000 17000 16000 1 15000 14000 Figure 4: Projected Elementary School Enrollment through 2011 -12 Elementary School Forecast 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 School Year Projections Change 2006 20,433 2007 20,761 328 2008 21,159 398 2009 21,603 444 2010 22,145 542 2011 1 22,690 1 545 Figure 5: Projected Middle School Enrollment through 2011 -12 Middle School Forecast 10000 9500 9000 — -- � -- - - - - -- _ , 8000 7500._ -.. 7000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 School Year Projections Change 2006 8,997 2007 8,886 -111 2008 9,241 355 2009 9,171 -70 2010 9,292 121 2011 9,528 236 Figure 6: Projected High School Enrollment through 2011 -12 Hgh School Forecast 15000 , 14000.._.._.__.__ -- 13000 - - -- --- ---- -- 12000 i 11000 -_ - --- ----- i--- -- --- - -- -- 10000 _._.._..--------------'r---------..__.._.---- 9000 -- ----- -- ---- - --�-- 8000 - 00^ 00`i• 00"� 000. 006 006 00A 006 000 O ^O O^� ti ti ti ti ti ti ry ti ti ry ti School Year Projection Change 2006 12,633 2007 12,844 211 2008 12,772 -72 2009 13,308 536 2010 13,557 249 2011 13,830 273 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 25 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Projected Capacity Over the next five years, school enrollment is projected to grow by approximately 3,000 students. To meet this demand and address current capacity needs, the School District plans on opening four new elementary schools, two new career high schools, and constructing classroom additions at eight elementary schools and one middle school for a total of 6,472 additional seats. This will allow the District to achieve and maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) of 100 percent of permanent FISH capacity for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSA), a LOS of 95 percent of permanent FISH capacity for middle school and a LOS 95 of percent of permanent FISH capacity for elementary school CSAs. The elementary and middle school CSAS are to have a lower LOS than that of the high school CSAS in order to allow those school types the opportunity to continue to provide special programs that require smaller classes. It also provides these school types additional latitude to provide the desired physical capacity and program capacity, while reducing the need for relocatable classrooms. Table 15 provides a list of the projects, capacity added, and planned opening date. Figure 7 identifies the location of property owned by the School District and the location future schools by school type, and the general location of future ancillary facilities in the county. comer County Public School Facilities Element 26 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Table 15: Proposed New Schools and Additions through 2011 -12 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 27 Data and Analysis Draft Document - November 2007 NEW SCHOOLS Planning Number Opened/ Completed Additional / New capacity Elementary Schools Calusa Park Area G 2008 909 Golden Gate Area J 2008 909 Immokalee K 2008 792 Golden Gate Area North L 2008 909 Parkside M 2007 909 Veterans Memorial 1 2007 786 Middle Schools Cypress Palm EE 2007 1132 Hioh Schools Lorenzo Walker Career HS III 2008 440 Immokalee Career Center 111 2008 600 Subtotal New Schools: 7,386 ADDITIONS School Additions Completed Additional Capacity Avalon ES 2009 150 Calusa Park ES 2008 178 Estates ES 2008 186 Highlands ES 2007 365 Lake Trafford ES 2007 17 Pinecrest ES 2007 97 Shadowlawn ES 2011 76 Tommie Barfield ES 2010 188 Village Oaks ES 2007 119 Golden Gate MS 2008 286 Subtotal Additions: 1,662 Total All New School and Addition Projects: 9,048 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 27 Data and Analysis Draft Document - November 2007 10 and 20 Year Forecast The first five years of the School District's enrollment forecast are based on a standard cohort survivor model modified to reflect housing and program trends. This method is reliable for three to five years of enrollment projections. However, it is not sufficient to forecast many years into the future. As the forecast attempts to predict housing development, population growth, and educational policy for 10 and 20 years, it is better to look beyond individual schools and to use County -level trends in population projections and zoning and land use capacity. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department has developed population projections by planning community through the year 2029. These projections were used as the basis for development of the District's 10- and 20 -year enrollment projections. Between 2000 and 2005 the overall population grew by 21 percent from 257,926 to 326,605. In 2000, the 33,876 students enrolled in Collier County's schools represented just over 13 percent (13.1 %) of the County's overall population. While PK -12 enrollment in Collier County schools grew by 19 percent between 2000 and 2005, the portion of the overall population it represented declined slightly to just under 13 percent (12.8 %). This percentage is projected to continue declining over the next 20 years as the county, and nation as a whole, grows older. Although the percentage of the population that student enrollment represents is expected to continue declining, enrollment in Collier County schools is expected to moderately increase over the next 20 years. As of October 2006, the School District had 43,397 students in grades pre- kindergarten through 12th grade. By 2017 this number is projected to grow by approximately 24 percent to over 55,900 students. Between 2017 and 2027 enrollment is projected to increase to nearly 73,700 students. This updated forecast shows a decrease in the rate of growth and 9,500 fewer students over the next 20 years when compared to last year's 20 -year enrollment projections. Tables 16 thorough 19 below provide a summary of the anticipated long range student enrollment and capacity needs for the School District. comer county Public School Facilities Element 29 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 16: 10 -Year School District Enrollment Forecast Table 17: 30 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Planning Area School Type Location planned Capacity Additional Total Existing and Additional # District FY 2017118 Existing planned planned projected Schools Totals 2017 Capacity Rural Estates Planning Community 1,957 2012 02 Urban Estates Planning Community Enrollment 2016 Through Through Through -2017 Elementary 2011 2012 2017 9 Elementary 27,543 18,712 7,083 25,795 1,818 2 Middle 11,656 9,618 1,418 11,036 1,132 1 High 16,788 13,822 0 13,822 3,844 2 Total 55,987 43,266 8,501 50,653 6,794 5 Table 17: 30 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Planning Area School Type Location planned Capacity Approximate Year Elementary "O" South Naples Planning Community 909 2012 Elementary "Q" Ave Maria Community 909 2012 Middle "GG" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,258 2017 High "EEE" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,957 2012 High "GGG" Urban Estates Planning Community 1,957 2016 Total 1 1 6,990 2017 Table 18: 20 -Year School District Enrollment Forecast Collier County Public School Facilities Element 30 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Total Additional FY 2027/28 Existing and planned #Schools District Projected Planned Capacity FY2017- Totals Enrollment Capacity Through 2027 Through 2027 2017 Elementary 36,244 27,613 8,631 9 Middle 15,338 12,168 3,170 3 High 22,092 17,666 4,426 2 Total 73,674 57,447 16,227 14 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 30 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 19: 20 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Planning Area School Type Location planned Capacity Approximate Year Elementary "P" Rural Estates Planning Community 909 2019 Elementary "S" Royal Fakapalm Planning Community 909 2020 Elementary "T" Urban Estates Planning Community 909 2022 Elementary "U" Corkscrew Planning Community 909 2018 Elements W" Royal Fakapalm Planning Community 909 2024 Elementary "X" Rural Estates Planning Community 909 2025 Elementary "Y" Corkscrew Planning Community 909 2023 Elementary "Z" Urban Estates Planning Community 909 2026 Elementary "A" Royal Fakapalm Planning Community 909 2027 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 Middle "DD" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,258 2021 Middle "II" Corkscrew Planning Community 1,258 2024 Middle 'W" South Naples Planning Community 1,258 High "HHH" Corkscrew Planning Community 1,957 High "DDD" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,957 16 Classroom Addition TBD High School 400 8 Classroom Addition TBD High School 200 Total 16,949 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 31 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 19-TI 1 School Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) are the geographic areas in which the level of service (LOS) standard is measured for each school type when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. A fundamental requirement of school concurrency is the establishment of these areas. This includes the option to establish a district -wide (the entire County) CSA, or less than district -wide (smaller geographic areas) CSAs. These CSAs are used to determine whether adequate capacity is available to accommodate new students generated from residential development for a school type; i.e., elementary, middle, and high schools. The legislature allows school concurrency to be applied district -wide initially, but requires that it be applied on a less than district -wide basis within five years of adoption (Chapter 163.3180(13)(c)1, FS). When applying school concurrency on a less than district -wide basis, the school district is required to maximize utilization of their schools and to apply "adjacency" for available capacity when reviewing residential development. Maximizing utilization requires the School District to evaluate school enrollment and attempt to balance the enrollment by shifting children from a CSA that is over its adopted LOS standard to a CSA that is under the LOS capacity to the greatest extent possible. When capacity is not available within a CSA at the adopted LOS of the school type, new residential development can take into consideration capacity in the adjacent CSA of the directly impacted service area (adjacency). School Concurrency Service Areas for Collier County Currently, the School District, the County and the participating local governments have decided to use less than district -wide CSAs. This form of CSA allows the review for available capacity to occur at the schools most likely to be impacted by the new residential development. If available capacity is not present, the adjacent CSAs will be analyzed for capacity. The CSAs were created using GIS, based on Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) for Collier County. A description of the methodology used to create the CSAs can be found in Appendix 3. There are a total of 32 CSAs for Collier County Public Schools: 15 Elementary School CSAs, 8 Middle School CSAs, and 8 High School CSAs. The individual TAZ numbers that were merged to create each CSA boundary are summarized in Tables 20 through 22. The Collier County Public School Facilities Element 32 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Elementary, Middle, and High School Concurrency Service Area maps are referenced as Figures 8 through Figure 10. In addition to the District - operated schools with defined attendance boundaries, Collier County contains several schools of choice. These include District - operated schools that enroll only those students who apply for admission, as well as charter schools not operated by the District. One example of the latter is Marco Island Charter Middle School. This school is not currently included in a CSA, but at such time as the utilization in the M2 - Southwest Area CSA is affected by residential development, the utilization of the Charter school would be taken into consideration. Currently, Marco Island Charter serves as a middle school for attendance by Marco Island Middle School students only, with no District transportation provided. With the projected residential growth in the M2 CSA anticipated for the mainland, eventually impacting Manatee Middle School and the CSA's LOS, an evaluation of the Charter school's enrollment and projected growth at that time may be factors in determining the necessity of its inclusion into the CSA. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 33 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 20: Elementary School CSA breakdown CSA /D CSA Name TAZ E1 Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 E2 Southwest South CSA 306 -313, 317 -334, 337 -340, 343 -346 E3 Southwest North CSA 233, 244, 246, 247, 249, 277, 278, 280, 287- 298,301- 305,314,355 -362 E4 Golden Gate Area CSA 196 -211, 245, 248, 251 -257, 264 -266 112, 117, 118, 120, 122, 157 -160, 170, E5 Naples Area CSA 171, 175 -179, 181 -183, 185 -187, 189, 191,195 1 -24, 27 -34, 45 -48, 51, 56 -58, 61, 64 -70, E6 Northwest Area CSA 119, 121, 123, 124, 151 -156, 166 -169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 250, 258 -263, 267, 270 -276, 279, 281 -284 37 -44, 52, 53, 73 -84, 91, 93, 102 -109, E7 Northwest Area CSA 113-116,125-144, 147, 148, 162 -165, 172 E8 Northwest Area CSA 85 -90, 92, 94 -101, 161, 180, 184, 188, 190, 219, 220, 365 -377 E9 Northwest Area CSA 212-215, 217, 218, 221 -225, 227 -232, 234 -241, 391, 393 E10 North Central Area CSA 216, 387, 389, 390, 392, 394 -403 Ell Immokalee Area CSA 417 -422, 426, 427, 430 -436 E12 Immokalee ES2 CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 -413, 416, 425, 428, 429 E13 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 386 E14 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 353,354 E15 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 347, 348, 352, 378 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 34 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 21: Middle School CSA breakdown CSA /D CSA Name TAZ Mt Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 1 -24, 27 -34, 37 -48, 51 -53, 56 -58, 61, 64- 70, 119, 121, 123, 124, 147, 151 -156, M2 Southwest Area CSA 166 -169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 230, 233, 244 -267, 270 -284, 287 -298, 301 -314, 317 - 334,337- 340,343- 346,355 -362 M3 North Central CSA 196 -217, 222 -225, 227 -229, 234 -237, 239, 387, 389 -402 H3 North Central CSA 73 -109, 112 -118, 120, 122, 125 -144, M4 Northwest CSA 148, 157 -165, 170 -172, 175 -191, 195,218 -221, 231, 232, 238, 240, 241, H4 Northwest CSA 365 -377, 403 M5 Immokalee CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 413, 416 -422, 425- _ Immokalee CSA 436 M6 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 386 M7 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 353, 354 _M8 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 347, 348, 352, 378 Table 22: High School CSA breakdown CSA /D CSA Name TAZ H1 Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 1 -24, 27 -34, 37 -48, 51 -53, 56 -58, 61, 64- 70, 119, 121, 123, 124, 147, 148, 151- 72 Southwest CSA 156,166-169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 246- 250, 255 -263, 265 -267, 270 -284, 287- 298, 301 -314, 317 -334, 337 -340, 343- 346, 355 -357, 361, 362 196 -217, 222 -225, 227 -230, 233 -237, H3 North Central CSA 239, 244, 245, 251 -254, 264, 358 -360, 387, 389 -403 73 -109, 112 -118, 120, 122, 125 -144, H4 Northwest CSA 157 -165, 170 -172, 175 -191, 195, 218- 221, 231, 232, 238, 240, 241, 365 -377 H5 Immokalee CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 -413, 416 -422, 425- 436 H6 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 386 H7 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 353, 354 H8 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 347, 348, 352, 378 t-omer t-oun[y FUDIIC school Facilities Element 35 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Level of Service The level of service (LOS) standards, which are adopted in the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) as well as in the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and Capital Improvements Element (CIE), are used to establish maximum permissible school utilization relative to the total capacity within a CSA. An essential component of determining the LOS standard for the geographic areas of the CSAs is the School District's ability to adopt a financially feasible capital program that can achieve and maintain the LOS standard by school type for each CSA. The school concurrency program's LOS standards balance the School District's ability to finance a capital program with its ability to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS for public schools. The establishment of a LOS standard ensures that new or expanded school facilities are built in time to accommodate students generated from new residential developments. If the capacity does not exist to support the students generated by the new development, both the new students and the schools are burdened with overcrowding issues. The Florida Legislature recognizes that an essential requirement for a concurrency system is the LOS standard at which a CSA is expected to operate. The new language established in Chapter 163.3177(12)(c), F.S. requires that the public school facilities element be "based upon data and analysis that address, among other things, how the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained." The ability to achieve and maintain the LOS must be based on a financially feasible Five -Year Capital Plan, adopted annually by the School Board as prescribed in Chapter 163.3180(13)(d)(1), F.S. The LOS standards will be adopted into the CIE of the local governments' comprehensive plans and must apply district -wide for the CSAs of all schools of the same type (elementary, middle, and high) as required in Chapter 163.3180 (13)(b)(3), F.S.. School Level of Service for Collier County The LOS standards for Collier County will be 100 percent of the permanent FISH capacity for high school CSAs and a LOS of 95 percent of the permanent FISH capacity for middle school CSAs and elementary school CSAs. Based on the School District's financially feasible Five - Year Capital Plan, there will be no CSAs which exceed the LOS standards in Collier County at the end of the five year planning period. Due to the School District's ability to achieve and maintain a LOS of no more than 100 percent for high schools and 95 percent for elementary and middle schools, there is no need to establish a tiered LOS at this time, or to isolate certain overcapacity schools in long -term management program. Tables 23 -1 through 23- Collier County Public School Facilities Element 39 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 20 identify the schools located in each CSA, their existing capacity, their current enrollment and their projected enrollment for the current five -year planning period. In addition, the tables identify the solutions (new schools, additions, etc.) which will be used to maintain the adopted LOS standard. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 40 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 A C? u 4 0 cc LD ?r. T A a v C t V C O U 2 N O O O) O OAi r0f r W 0 N O O r N I C f0 W ^� o � o_ �j Si 8i rn n: m N 0 V W NI °� tD O e o e ;e' e O a mS 0 � N 0 N O e o e e — o 0 o N ry O �,t00 U 0] A;iO A 0 N O O go C O A A W o w m A `.S N N pOi � U O N Q QN W gg N� rn A LL J Q V g2 . 9 r U) 0 W W— W W O E o O1J O O C C O E fn > O a U a O O U3 O y L U a y E rn M L_ N O C (D C N .T. u E a a) L of °o a W U U p w N N Co U U L Z c Em ac ~ as co N N O O O a U N N O N ro Z 6 c a c '>o° co- o a3 j N O� T O O N O c O f6 � c J c c O O o w 4 c O O a) O v E y W J T Q d a o U 1 3 Z,M Z m m aci !4 d m :° Co 2 f0 W C c O pl N U C C C W N N d O m ` O O N O> H a 0 W U W N W W Q W 0 3 G t a e o o e o rn 8i rn A A: �j r N O E o O1J O O C C O E fn > O a U a O O U3 O y L U a y E rn M L_ N O C (D C N .T. u E a a) L of °o a W U U p w N N Co U U L Z c Em ac ~ as co N N O O O a U N N O N ro Z 6 c a c '>o° co- o a3 j N O� T O O N O c O f6 � c J c c O O o w 4 c O O a) O v E y W J T Q d a o U 1 3 Z,M Z m m aci !4 d m :° Co 2 f0 W C c O pl N U C C C W N N d O m ` O O N O> H a 0 W U W N W W Q W 0 3 G t a 3 G t a k § ) ±@mm§ ®7cER2 �- ag «a § ) @em _ a �!!@/ w 7�)S/72 !° ) ±@mm§ ®7cER2 OD 2� JCL �) )f G*\ ) §e _ f� / } k�(� \\� do at m 0 Sl © 80 \ #i FE k )ƒ CZ �7 / }k� «§ o \\§ \ /k � �� ��c �E� ;= k $ -c ?\ k§° f§f &|■ J•Z ,/ % ®« )/ �i\ a 2�- LL , te_ EL J y R2{ �2 ©«f �a§ \a ��. aff §�) �+] i \.2 G§a 2 ®7 § © _%| w &§« @m £#k f/ G 2 a-0 1 E £ � § C) 7�)S/72 /gg\§ CL� �IE2r§ OD 2� JCL �) )f G*\ ) §e _ f� / } k�(� \\� do at m 0 Sl © 80 \ #i FE k )ƒ CZ �7 / }k� «§ o \\§ \ /k � �� ��c �E� ;= k $ -c ?\ k§° f§f &|■ J•Z ,/ % ®« )/ �i\ a 2�- LL , te_ EL J y R2{ �2 ©«f �a§ \a ��. aff §�) �+] i \.2 G§a 2 ®7 § © _%| w &§« @m £#k f/ G 2 a-0 1 E £ � § to CED � a 2 ) LE aa�§ 1 77777 ®]rr2 f9 a ) k_ t ƒa7 .§ =i\ } \\ 2% f I k] \ \ /ƒ �| ) f z ) }/ CC:-, - .S)� \ 0 a) %// k )/ k f D . t 2 \� 0E E � ( |2 >$ � { \ � { \ \ % a >ag §■ m {%Gm■ _ } ¥ §mm§ IL21 @,; � ag ge m _ /\ i a \ - }I ) \ \ Z \\ » �\ CMLf 0 - -. - -- - (D /I 2 > '\ , *a/ �§ k \k �k \) I« a2 §�e3 CD CL \ CV § § k 2 ) E � � $ la mi 2 4 2 g 3 § § x X77§ f&& � �I9@ 727§ <§§ CL�s \ #Ak <@K } ±ka /�+ 9 rK ■' �(\�a 2 2lka � G 2 ! A % d // \\ kL � ( \ -$ CL.2 { = U� § § A� } ■fa A/ k wcL /o { { � § % z 2 � k » )# /S§ Rj�)7f « ®K® §*2q■ §$ §29 <§&; \ § 2 ƒ\2� { )2 � }\ )± §)§ �2 x2 « ®K® §*2q■ §$ §29 2 E � \ u § a � § « U) k f CL k % \) I§ ]} ${ £$ j CD �§ � � \ § 2 )2 }\ 2 E � \ u § a � § « U) k f CL k % \) I§ ]} ${ £$ j CD �§ � � i a 0 H T i. C m v � O O o U O t v to m v I 0 O ato M- 0 O N4 'E lV O N � c_ N C _ 7 C 8 C1 t d t n v v � d 1 � c Zq �F b W C 1�f R 2 ,tea O me C CL] m U O O Z 2 I to x U) ffi ry a. J Z E Q C7 0 C E ai Q 0 U O Z I I —_ IV mii2�'df ggoa m i3 !Q ci N D R( C O i j N N U Y c 0 8 N 2 O WO N NC O U y O 0 O N O Z L N V N t5 w-a E 2 P c m O > y Z UUULco A 3 m a i� ,1 ap ap e- Ig ae "g �msmss,�� `- N U N � tpo° CO O S TO �(OO w ^ O O mm T w ^ ^ o a N 1p m r o O n b o r m N 1p N b O rn 0 w ^ e e e ae aE aE o a� cV O 0 0 (p e W ^ e- m � ^ -c3 N O cQi Q in b b Grp m W f'09 — O t° f0 N ir � OO a p O r S m N� N () N O c JS� ^�`c3m�N w ^ •- S x c O U3 �zixwC7�� O t v to m v I 0 O ato M- 0 O N4 'E lV O N � c_ N C _ 7 C 8 C1 t d t n v v � d 1 � c Zq �F b W C 1�f R 2 ,tea O me C CL] m U O O Z 2 I to x U) ffi ry a. J Z E Q C7 0 C E ai Q 0 U O Z I I —_ IV mii2�'df ggoa m i3 !Q ci N D R( C O i j N N U Y c 0 8 N 2 O WO N NC O U y O 0 O N O Z L N V N t5 w-a E 2 P c m O > y Z UUULco A 3 m a i� ,1 § k k k 0 w co � ra LE k E k a / f ) LU 2k §2 �7 �E $f 7 E 7 � ) 4 [ { kf \ 25 /7 d7 L )f\ Z 2§ k( f C-4 3 { J ) — C4 «\ k\ � ƒ§ /2 ! E �(5 \ 0 U) /�� �k a �/ ae§ w§ �Q �0 0) E EZ �� ID �E w u ■$I Gf ® a /Slma2 I �j7\EEmK� ee ■ � �G�r ;\■ ; k22 } \¥ �. . �. ��. � \ ° L§A]\/ _§ ƒ / )73 ull) 3 k E k a / f ) LU 2k §2 �7 �E $f � � 7 E 7 � ) 4 [ { kf \ 25 /7 d7 L )f\ Z 2§ k( f C-4 3 { J ) — C4 «\ k\ � ƒ§ /2 ! E �(5 \ 0 U) /�� �k a �/ ae§ w§ �Q �0 0) E EZ �� ID �E w u ■$I Gf � � 4 Q O a d V Z I .p a Q V m c _m 2 w O CL 0) C O d L C E d m > L 2 U d Z i = H d N 2 pl O d u t �W rn E a r v_ g i t7 a c°n n 3 COI 2 AL J o N � O ag O M U (n 3 C $ d c� g0 ci N O N m fN0 �pOpH r W W U ag CL 1 1ST m _ O O W N c d D a fq f4 d a C W N D :2 ao tptpOO �pp� ��pp O N a 01 m N O 1� m Co W o o n —o i RR ca w CL a, s O [cpO pO W x = ti O m r m rn ae m � O N m o o S m o p O N Q m O f0 ^m^ p Ao O W N (p O O S O m U N CV O ^ ep o O O O a�p w N S N mm a c (C fs (.7 = U V C7 m _m 2 w O CL 0) C O d L C E d m > L 2 U d Z i = H d N 2 pl O d u t �W rn E a r v_ g i t7 a c°n n 3 COI 2 AL J o U O ag O M U (n 3 C $ d c� g0 N U ag CL 1 1ST m _ O O W N c d a fq f4 d a C W N E :2 ao _m 2 w O CL 0) C O d L C E d m > L 2 U d Z i = H d N 2 pl O d u t �W rn E a r v_ g i t7 a c°n n 3 COI 2 AL J r 4 0 0 a Q z I) W c Q v C m v c v° Q N O W e e e T 2 1 m ^ U 0 o N ONi N `c <o va W ^ N In pt OJ Ql m O � i � U rn O O V ^ J CL rn � 0 O p t0 O) N O U o ^ 0 C � � W i I o N O p, f�J Of N U I � I C O O OBI O Q<'J rn N U o j N O ONi n 0 w mom, N LL ^ � I i I � 0 N W ~ O � a d tX Yi> w a °o r N 2. f0 C W -u W Oi CC_C N O d r 3 C N a to Wp Cd • 8 0 d C C w CL O i �3 a� L' QC7 t C N O � a$ 1 C N U W a 'a0` YO A d 1 W R 3 C a °o r N 2. f0 C W -u W Oi CC_C N O d r 3 C N a to Wp Cd • 8 0 d C C w CL O i �3 a� L' QC7 t C N O � a$ 1 C N U W a 'a0` YO A d 1 W R 3 C 4 O a c W Q V c U N � q- V (O � O� OJ CO OJ 01 0 N O N f�0 m 1� CO N A W ��mm�Sim o sp 8 0 W W O cao ° . fi n Z� aft ° at 0 O �J e 3e e e o ➢° OOj � O P v N o N W •^- N = m < <o o o e ee 24 e 5 7g o N t7 f0 f0 �O o avmp a�J (O 0 N L minor N<u�N �yW` `- LL w 0 o� d in ARc�=z °oaf Ei N N L N LLp� 5. U M L CM N G c p N 8.04 r Q O C � O T OI C L 0 O �oo L U �C fA N O O L U 0 O C z > >� Vl d a N t - a = N C ® _ W � W 6 U w �p W N N p W Z �y e d � � = Lu E s (9w Oa Ei n O 0 cc V aQ r � N m U o W dE 3° 2Q �n cO co e N m � �TN M = W m �iT 3 N � O � w Z W o N ° � a w O ICI O _ `c u�r com I W � o a�a-x ate; I o � rn O 0 mN � u0i n �Iw V W o 0 N tU vri m (�O N U O 0 N O � N h Cam•! o e e a a = rn m rn rn o� O O n O V r N tp r c7 In b r o i yy � �nrco m W � C7 n w Q U N LU W C 3 N O 41 n 3 J aQ r � N m U o W dE 3° 2Q �n cO co e N N fEf'1 � d Q �p W Q W W V N m r � C W M a 0 Y = t W J & O U1 N Ira °w CL3 C7 n w Q U N LU W C 3 N O 41 n 3 J �rrK � <K$ ) \§§§ ƒ_((($ )#]§§ �])§2 �(i§£ �]\k[ ge r) \g§ =1 § §, ,. � £ \ : ) fpm � E/` ( $ 08 � §7[ F5C\l 002 �■e52« #K` { k k �rrK � <K$ ) \§§§ ƒ_((($ )#]§§ �])§2 �(i§£ �]\k[ ge r) \g§ =1 § §, ,. � £ \ ¥k) : ) fpm E/` ( 08 0 §7[ F5C\l 002 k)k #K` { k k \(c % { ¥k) ƒ fpm E/` ( 08 §7[ F5C\l 002 #K` f {a ( \(c % { m �m \�k 0� a a2 0 $ \\ } /k)\ Ik � / � m it x a m c c cc ad 0 8 c .2 �w c cc uQ o� u .� a r � c � t V E C O. O O V �s m +• a c c �3 a .p m a 4 O c o U it J k to It § € « % £ J ) ■ E \ % f§ -a k£ 2/ f® ƒk CO L7 �§ �| ■� ) f k � � ■ � � ) \ k \ 2 § E ) % } LU � � � a { % }G§ £q \#R(RK ^)Z@@§ �«<rk ®7rrP§ <Kgr■ � f f ®- ®g■ IL�la ) ±RE @§ �]mgF2 ) \yQ @§ �7iGR§ -,»4e q2 °s 2I }&\2 j\k\ 0 2 75. wo ■ E \ % f§ -a k£ 2/ f® ƒk CO L7 �§ �| ■� ) f k � � ■ � � ) \ k \ 2 § E ) % } LU � � � a { % w W 20 W O a 0 t7 y Q s� 2 V d C C A ad of m a TL c tea` c 0 w � T � t C� V G a° 0 w m v c R� c 3 0 M m �w T c Q T v c n � 4 U O c o U n 3 J i § % z » # � § / 22)i; §# /@§ 2 �3p J� §g2; § C) �]@r§ � § §�§ )±*@§ ®]§@2 8�� ■ E � � i i m2d � \§k § \ ,■ > > 2 /§ �6 �� SQ)\ \� 720 f■ z k �o 8 �r- F8 27 7 ~# 0 2&s ±aW /�kk ) $$7 2af w ®2 E7 Lu a §3 a=§ 02E �§% A ] \) >k} { tm 3p ) / / /■7 § \ ,■ > > 2 /§ �6 �� SQ)\ \� 720 f■ z k �o 8 �r- F8 27 7 ~# 0 2&s ±aW /�kk ) $$7 2af w ®2 E7 Lu a §3 a=§ 02E �§% A ] \) >k} { tm { tm r 4 v O 0 to Q 0 Z m w/ G O V W 2 W m A a a m u c 0 E a m c C R ad 08 M r � R tea` c 0 d � c _a t u E c a° O V y L a c c m a W a J ) @ - § + « m j J AE � / � kc -6 // �i )#mm@K 2 k � 4) CL f @ km )'� �* kM §� 7` A� f) �! »w ®¥(K■ n] #7 (E Z\ �� � 04 k �? § a LU» 4; k I I k 9.2 ) �L m §LU m§ ■t U)I$ < /§ §£ ) \mmr§ �57m /v7 � � =s § ¥mmr& �4 §£ \m j r2 272 2■ [f 22\§ m\m7 ) \E 55wco � / � kc -6 // �i ak 2 k � 4) CL f @ km )'� �* kM §� 7` A� f) �! »w )0 n] #7 (E Z\ �� � 04 k �? § a LU» 4; k I I k 9.2 ) �L m §LU m§ ■t U)I$ � / � )-- - /aaam ^]8ar2 � « _ ■ �8 *ekM ~)§ 22 % `` f \B2z§ 4g§§§ 7�]£&/§ J }\R§ «A \ #■m2R £ � ^]8ar2 « _ �8 k/ ~)§ 22 `` ��3 * � G■ k a- \ \( \ ! / 2 a \\ 7] f$ )» \\ 2} �Z \§ �. «.. «( \% 2� 7\ �D )2 - £ 0 ,/ £ ƒk U) ƒI ) �I D 2f ) c � 0( L k W k \±r £ � i TMIF.M.1ii =-1 1 Co- location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School District and the Local Governments. The School District will look for opportunities to co- locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Educational Plant Survey. Likewise, co- location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the updates to their Comprehensive Plan, Schedule of Capital Improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities which may be compatible with schools. For example, opportunities for co- location and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, and stadiums. Coordinated planning for co- location and joint use will result in capital savings for the School District and Local Governments and create community focal points. Co- location and shared use of facilities are important tools in budgeting and community building for the School District and Local Governments. Collier County is 2,025 square miles in area, and includes the cities of Naples, Marco Island and Everglades City. Most of the county's land area is inland and some distance from the Gulf of Mexico. The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department plays a key role in providing water and beach access, as well as providing alternative, land -based activities. Through the State's coordinated planning requirements for school concurrency, Local Governments and the School District are directed to recognize the benefits and opportunities realized through the sharing of facilities and costs to the greatest extent possible. The School District would benefit from joint use of parks in the vicinity of public schools, due largely to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department's dedication to promoting health and wellness, alternative leisure activities, community involvement through sports and special events for County residents. Figure 11 displays locations of current and proposed school locations, as well as parcels of County -owned land and locations of County facilities. A number of proposed school locations are located adjacent to parcels owned by the County, including the Future "R" Elementary, Future "JJ" Middle, Future "EEE" High, Future "GGG" High, and Future "BY' High Schools. For appropriate County properties that are not already programmed, these adjacencies could provide the opportunity for co- location of County and School District facilities for the purpose of enhancing the quality of life for area residents and students. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 42 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The East Naples Community Park refurbishments, soccer field and center expansion, may create an opportunity to establish a relationship with the School District for mutual use in exchange for use of schools for community meeting purposes. The planning of Manatee Community Park is in Phase I of its development, with construction time still to be determined. This park, as well as the large regional parks in Collier County including Orangetree Regional Park and North Collier Regional Park, may provide coordination opportunities with the School District. The North Collier Regional Park's Exhibit Hall currently provides learning opportunities for students, and the softball and basketball courts at Max A. Hasse Jr. Community Park provide centrally located recreation opportunities to several sections of Collier County, including Golden Gate Estates and the rural North Naples areas. Co- location is intended to provide efficient use of existing infrastructure and discourage sprawl. Identification early in a budget cycle and coordination among agencies will promote successful and effectively utilized public facilities. The School District and the County Department of Parks and Recreation currently maintain negotiated shared -use agreements as part of existing co- location efforts. Each agreement, and the stipulations contained therein, are site - specific and are situationally dependent. Cost effective co- location or joint use of School District or Local Government -owned property could provide substantial savings for existing and future public facilities. The model of cooperation that exists between the School District and County Department of Parks and Recreation could act as the model for coordination between the School District and other entities, including special districts. Opportunities for co- location and joint use should be explored with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ( PARAB) and the School District. The PARAB provides guidance and community input for the Parks and Recreation Department. As residential development proceeds in different areas of the County, opportunities for co- location and joint use should be incorporated into the planning of public facilities to serve the local communities. Mutual Use Agreements For each instance of co- location and shared use, the School Board and Local Government shall enter into a separate mutual use agreement addressing legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, facility supervision and any other issues that may arise from co- location and joint use. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 43 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 School District Capital Improvements and Revenue Sources School District Capital Improvements The School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the foundation of an annual planning process that allows the School District to effectively address changing enrollment patterns, development, and growth. It is updated and adopted each year, and provides details of district -wide capital improvement needs, funding availability and a proposed schedule for addressing the improvements. Identified in the CIP are proposed projects that are needed to address existing and future projected capacity needs. The School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program is an expansion and reformatting of the State's required 5 -Year Work Plan. The goal of the CIP is to encourage community support and understanding, and ultimately to assure public accountability. With the passage of Senate Bill 360 in 2005, local governments are now required to annually adopt the School District's CIP into the CIE of their respective comprehensive plans. Therefore, the School District's capital improvements must be supported by a financially feasible plan, and formally adopted by the School Board each year. The CIP serves as this required financially feasible plan and demonstrates how the School District will achieve and maintain the adopted LOS for schools. Table 24 is a comprehensive summary of the School District's planned capital improvement program along with projected expenditures and revenue over the five -year planning period, as tentatively adopted by the Collier County School Board in April 2007. It provides the estimated cost of addressing the School District's capital construction program to ensure the availability of permanent classrooms for a five year projected Pre -K through 12 student enrollment. It also provides the estimated cost of addressing site acquisition, health and safety items, educational technology, equipment and ancillary facility needs, and other capital expenditures, by year, for the five -year planning period. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 45 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 /E L I.i. ^�J W O _co ca U O cu E CO � N o U- O O S N N o 0 0 0 O r m rn m 25 .n- N N q Cl v rn m a } N N c n N co Sc 4 o C v n S m LLN ° o N r r mo r m co O O o r v�" a+ co n � m N N m o M w $ m C6 N m m L6 O C6 y m M l0 S m...(O (p - �D7 � A 'O W t�J [°i�I Q) (`N') O_ OJ ,O N h .O N O O % Y S OJ cr0 Ol O m. m O O S N (D n S m uN"i (n' imp m p F m D N 7 tG In_ r O N_ O) O O N tG `ct O 7 u'� nJ N m� M N �° lD. m r Q). a T N T N O u Y N c N 8m N N Sm m N 8n � ppO SSr n SSr 8rn pQm m ppm 8rn .p- Q_ N N N CV N N N N N cV N N N N C CD O R m m e O_ m A C 22 O C o >o c o E m 'E E c m rO a c d 0 C r-. U c' c m c h m a _� m dj w _ 2 O c c L o m .� Q a1 O c LL'S 6, _ 19 c w o° a T c E 2 2 O 4! L L m 'C E «C = Y CJ L N w °w 2 -T w w 8 p t tf�f m a w 2 m y �i m m E c m 3 L rn U VJ c c o c U m h O o W B E E E .W. 'a0-+ N 3 z c) w w 'x x E m m w c� 'x w �n y x Q a' 0 z y U N m 3 3 c J m 3 m O� J o 2NG 2p5 S 85 2pS5 2p5 r � N r O N st pp�m N O O N S O O NN o a0 v O f0 M GO O N M ag7 0 aQQD (QQ+J (O t+j 1p Of S BE Q0 25 Q 25 R'a S �i S m n °e } O IL O O .6 men ter 25 g 525_ N N n i cq �O V' N V l$y 8A p'O- pN gS SE 8 gm a S CD O � M A N N 1tJ � N N m O O Oct m O N Q 1[] O] Q H N [�> N tGe+f <S tNJ 8 8� 0 SN 0 S S ppr 0 Yi pO� YV O pV p� S �CppJ �Vp M 8 pp 8N CO �r O 01 O 0 O `� V O g S N W O O O pj [m�J fp vj O g O O iL O N O N in Fi in O m 'g h m rn m rn_ m E A K fS�l � Q N N N pO C ppV 8- 8N S p 8 S� 8 8 p pC6 pp S ppN A O LLO Go O M f0 m g O g O O g N LO m V M O N N M fO p� N S S. V' �fl O pp O pp O. S O S t0 O } (O�J pp 1p O� N (D N OJ O 8 O O O pO 1� N uA'J pp VAi cs O m R O O O. f q O O O p Al N m GO Q (D tmm 0 Qf O 0 V 0 S O Orl N b O. r N N O OI ��II O O m m O al ' N o{Vi S N � O n 0 �. 0 Y7 Q 0 LL] m PJ lL r N N 7 7 o m Q N N C d A E m o E u .E U g a-. V d 2 C Y c -76 c Q a W C O m Fi m H w ii v a c c E c E W C O C K p c y °W W o 32 9 Q 9 Cmm � A F W W W X O C fA CV' Q N W d N m 2 yN� m 0 Si a E o n¢ S 8 m 'Od 'a Q a E? g y V m m _O 4m- W U (Li f5 T G ��+ O m <7 X {gyp N L N= O O O 'O x N 2 m cn lq m to x 7 y L to x 0 2 LL = x 6, d R 7 W f� y+ CO) fA M y _ m 3 m O� J 3 m e z m S a°n S 25 g° T T N T m S S ON! t°i°OU O N t�pp p�i g S 25 2y�5 25 0 S 8 �c N S m NN (O Y'J tp A N 1� N N p0e N m�m f'1 O aD a0 1D S N 1° N 8 1° Of N V 8 m N th N N (O S pO O O O N O O O O S p IlJ S W � N SS 8 8 pp N S pp {p{ S RlO ai Lo O NN O O q O O O �t[7 J Sp _ O N O S w S M p S N p N N m N O V' �tJ N O O O O O O ppO Op LL] 8 n T9 r � N N IfJ SS O O pppL6_ SS SS Oi i' Ci C T S S b O O � O c A po< p O O S O 0 0 0 NO LL O O fOD t0 In N l7 1° LL] r 1° 1� N S 1U f^O m tD fN0 f0 ' p <O [�l O S S S O S N S N N pQ .-- N N N (O O a t° N N YJ A h r V �U CD Z6 N ^j p (NNq pp 8 8 8 N t° Yd NN [O�J (NO R Q n A O (D N t0[J OI O N OAi ll� N N N m N L6 Ld O N I CO SSp SS O S p 00 O O o CoJ p W S ((��jj S SS S 88 pp pp� } N O S O 8 V SS W S 88O_ S O ppOpp S O O m lL o N 0 N a N Co ° N (D < at N l0 N g LLJ O O S (D Oi N N A N N N ' h O N YJ N N N cc Ol r O O N O Y'J LLLLLLJJJ O ti r A pp S O t0[) O (O O G (Q O N O N fU pO CO O p {Ypf ~V' tE O (U t^'J ^ O A N N LL N .d- N � ty. o a C CL o � i d d d d C e 0 t' LL c NU IL C W{ n L R 'p E e° IL E W c V 5° E w° d m' F s _ d LL d a a N S m U U U N 3 m e z m f ad § \i kf( E]�I IJaa !#a7 (7S � � - > £ a k§# :# \#kkk; cm cm A # s Ci cm 04 a#9n 4/ #■e Kk / /� 44#S■ kk( }k�\ $K R` ©� \ #\ mm § §§ f ad § \i kf( E]�I IJaa !#a7 (7S � � - > £ a School District Revenue Sources The School District is responsible for funding the capital needs of the public schools in the county. They utilize a variety of State and local revenue sources to provide for the capital needs of the School District. Local funding sources include millage (maximum 2 -mil local property tax), school impact fees, Certificates of Participation (COPS do not require voter approval), short term loans, and voter- approved General Obligation Bonds and sales tax revenue (usually one -half to one cent increase for specific projects). In addition to the local funding sources, the School District seeks the maximum available state funding provided through Public Education and Capital Outlay (PECO) funds and other state revenue sources such as Capital Outlay and Debt Service (CO & DS) and Class Size Reduction (CSR) appropriations. State capital outlay funding sources are derived from motor vehicle license tax revenue Capital Outlay and Debt Service (CO & DS), and gross receipts tax revenue from utilities Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) funds. In addition, the recent mandate for smaller class sizes has made additional state funding available. However, state funds represent less than 10 percent of the School District's capital needs. The School District has the legal authority to utilize up to 1.5 mils of the 2.0 capital tax to fund the debt service or Certificates of Participation (COPs) issues. It anticipates future borrowing of $168,300,000 over the next five years to provide adequate facilities for anticipated growth. Table 25 is a summary of estimated revenue sources and estimated annual revenue for the next five years. In general, funding available from state and local sources (including the issuance of long- term debt and the continuation of school impact fees) are sufficient to finance the School District's capital improvement program. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 50 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 N H faI H N n O Q N LL c C a 9 d CAC yG N W 0 O A E 7 to I h N d a A H W W Of E W O L E E U) c v E v w v y u LL O O O N O N L �n V O In Ol V � Q � N I a � � u ry N C J Q J O � O V � L m � � Y � O IO L U cl 0 r N 'I _ r N V N� Yy p O C] Cra m pN Q p O J n {+ m O c:a N i`- O CJ U U Off cv O } � ��•��aa SS p ui N N N ai r Ya O b m O O } O r OS C7 S Ua W O O O O S (A U> L(t M N M1 LO (A N O M1 N N (moo P (n N U ri m N e yF' N Yv op S �Cf p p p O L O C1 } O C t'a ' N S U N CCfN pNf M IR LL O O c3 � m o M1 N r m Ua — pa b f' N GN pppp O 6 M O 6 O pp M Ca 0O Ch 8 O o V W O O n m m m ti r�i r tt n .N- m r N N Ni o N a iti � cMp' a-. O � N t7 Vf G C's [J f m W (Y K Ca :� V D U m •! m � M O r) D O U N N •t S Imo. N M1 •1' � (O �Cf M [V O m M •1' M m M pa b Cp s N CO � LL m c a m A o E Im 1 4C u u U W t tll •� b � � E m tr of � C to S� Q Q a t c y J w ep (%! c v E v w v y u LL O O O N O N L �n V O In Ol V � Q � N I a � � u ry N C J Q J O � O V � L m � � Y � O IO L U cl 0 Supporting Infrastructure Needs and School Planning Shared Costs By coordinating the planning of future schools with affected local governments, the School District can better identify the costs associated with site selection and the construction of new schools. Coordinated planning requires the School District to coordinate school planning with the representatives from various government agencies. The affected jurisdiction may coordinate with School District staff to perform its own technical review of the site. This analysis permits the School District and affected local governments to jointly determine the need for and timing of on -site and off -site improvements necessary to support each new school. The School District's projected student growth requires the School Board to obtain land for future use when it is available, at a reasonable cost. Collier County is undergoing significant infrastructure development and analyzing the infrastructure needs for planned school sites as necessary. With this process, shared funding for capital improvements for school sites can be determined according to the responsibility of each party for each specific school site. Necessary infrastructure coordination may include: potable water lines, sewer lines, drainage systems, roadways including turn lanes, traffic signalization and signage, site lighting, bus stops, and sidewalks. These improvements are to be assessed on a school -by- school basis. As the need for new schools is identified, improvements will be assessed at the earliest point in the school planning process as possible. Approval conditions can cover the timing and responsibility for construction, as well as the operation and maintenance of required on -site and off -site improvements. Any such improvements should be in keeping with the financially feasible capital plan adopted by the School Board. Other cost - effective measures should be considered by local governments during the process of formulating neighborhood plans and programs and reviewing large residential projects. During those processes, the County and the Cities can encourage developers or property owners to provide the School District with incentives to build schools in their neighborhoods. These incentives may include, but are not limited to, donation and preparation of site(s), acceptance of stormwater run -off from future school facilities into development project stormwater management systems, reservation or sale of school sites at pre - development prices, construction of new school facilities or renovation of existing school facilities, and provision of transportation alternatives. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 52 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 School District Capital Improvements Summary Florida law requires that the PSFE of a local government comprehensive plan address how the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained. The ability to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS must be based on a school district's financially feasible Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan. The School District continuously reviews its capital needs, via the District School Board of Collier County Capital Improvements Plan, on a long term basis. Furthermore, the law requires that the public school LOS standards be adopted into local government capital improvement element, and must apply to all schools of the same type (elementary, middle, and high). The District School Board of Collier County Capital Improvements Plan, as developed for the CSA as proposed, will achieve and maintain the adopted LOS in each CSA for the five year period. The School District's Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan is required to be financially feasible which will correct any existing deficiencies to attain the adopted LOS, and maximize school utilization. Capacity is added in accordance with the annually adopted financially feasible Five -Year Capital Plan. The adopted LOS standard, the level of will not be exceeded in each CSA for the five year period with the continued coordinated planning of school facilities. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 53 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 APPENDICIES Collier County Public School Facilities Element 54 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 ! = 7 Specific GIS SQL statements used in the identification of the five housing types can be found below. Furthermore, "School Type" = Elementary, Middle, or High can be appended to the beginning of these statements to isolate just the housing types for the Elementary, Middle, or High School students only. Please note that depending on whether the final GIS file is a shape file or a personal geo- database feature class, the double quotation marks (" ") will need to be replaced with single quotation marks (' '), and the parenthesis (( )) will need to be replaced with brackets ([ 1). Single Family: ("USE—CODE" = 1 OR "USE—CODE" = 51 OR "USE—CODE" = 52 OR "USE _CODE" = 60 OR "USE CODE" = 61 OR "USE CODE" = 66 OR "USE CODE" = 67 OR "USE CODE" = 69 OR "USE—CODE" = 99) Multi Family: ("USE—CODE" = 3 OR "USE—CODE" = 6 OR "USE—CODE" = 7 OR "USE_CODE" =8 OR "USE—CODE" =71 OR "USE—CODE" =75 OR "USE—CODE" =79) Mobile Home: ("USE—CODE" = 2 OR "USE—CODE" = 28) Condo /Co -Op: ( "USE_CODE" = 4 OR "USE—CODE" = 5) Government: ("USE—CODE" = 83 OR "USE_CODE" = 84 OR "USE—CODE" = 85 OR "USE—CODE" = 86 OR "USE—CODE" = 87 OR "USE—CODE" = 88 OR "USE—CODE" = 90) Collier County Public School Facilities Element 55 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 The following is a comparison of the methodologies used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report and the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study. The description presents student generation rates (SGRs) that would have been produced from the data used in this report, had the methodology in the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study been used. The 2006 update to the Collier County Impact Fee Study, prepared by Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc., contains a simplified version of the SGR analysis used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This simplified version is based on only three housing categories: Single Family, Multi - Family, and Mobile Homes. The Tindale- Oliver and Associates study utilized square footage for single family residences, which created three separate categories and single family residential SGRs. When those three categories of single family SGRs are averaged, the result is a Single Family SGR of 0.38. Additionally, the Tindale- Oliver study methodology resulted in a SGR for Multi - Family of 0.12, and a SGR for Mobile Homes of 0.21. The methodology in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report utilized student - specific data, current as of the October 2006 FTE count. The Florida Department of Revenue tax code (DOR Code) was assigned to each parcel in the County's database at the Collier County Property Appraiser (CCPA) Office. The DOR Code serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. By utilizing the DOR tax code as a housing type identifier, a residence could be assigned any one of nine different housing categories (DOR Codes 1 -9 are different types of residential units). For this Data and Analysis report a total of five categories were selected: Single Family, Multi - Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums /Co- Operatives, and Government. Utilizing Geographic Information Systems, a spatial join of the data allowed each parcel's unique DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database to be appended to each student point. This further allowed each student to be classified into one of five housing unit categories: Single Family, Multi - Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums and Cc- Operatives, and Government. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 56 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The methodology used in the Tindale- Oliver impact fee study, however, does not differentiate between multi - family units, condominiums (condominiums can be considered a multi - family residence), or government housing units. Utilizing the impact fee study's methodology, the student counts for Multi - Family, Condo /Co -Op, and Government were summed. This resulted in a "multi- family" count of 11,477 students. The process was then repeated for the number of units for those same housing types, for a result of a total of 104,655 "multi- family" units. The SGR figures that resulted from the use of this methodology on the data used in the Data and Analysis report are shown in the table below. The data used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report, when the five categories are combined down into three housing categories, results in SGRs similar to those of the Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Study (compare to Table 13: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates). Most importantly, the two methodologies' results follow a similar high -low trend in their resulting SGRs, in which Single Family classifications have the highest SGRs, followed by Mobile Homes, and then Multi- Family classifications. The difference between the two methodologies is in the detail that is represented in the Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This is due to the specificity of the DOR Code, and particularly through separating out the Condo category, which has a very high number of units in relationship to the number of students. It is essentially the same methodology, but when the data is separated into greater detail, the numbers change. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 57 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Single Family Multi - Family Mobile Homes Elementary 0.16 0.06 0.12 Middle 0.10 0.03 0.04 High 0.12 0.03 0.05 Total 0.38 0.12 0.21 The data used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report, when the five categories are combined down into three housing categories, results in SGRs similar to those of the Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Study (compare to Table 13: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates). Most importantly, the two methodologies' results follow a similar high -low trend in their resulting SGRs, in which Single Family classifications have the highest SGRs, followed by Mobile Homes, and then Multi- Family classifications. The difference between the two methodologies is in the detail that is represented in the Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This is due to the specificity of the DOR Code, and particularly through separating out the Condo category, which has a very high number of units in relationship to the number of students. It is essentially the same methodology, but when the data is separated into greater detail, the numbers change. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 57 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The following steps were used to create the boundaries of the CSAs for school concurrency (Figures 8, 9, and 10). The progression of this process is shown on the succeeding pages, using maps of CSA E5 as the example. 1) Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) boundary data obtained from Collier County GIS was used as the basis for creating the individual CSAs for each school type (elementary, middle, and high). TAZs provide a good base for defining CSAs, because they provide a geography commonly used for analytical and planning purposes, and contain population information. 2 and 3) Based on staff determinations, each individual TAZ was grouped and assigned a CSA value. The groupings were designed to closely match, but not replicate, individual school boundaries. Although individual school boundaries are based on TAZ geography, exact matches between TAZ groupings and individual school boundaries do not occur. This is primarily because a CSA may contain more than one school. Additionally, school boundaries change over time, and a match between school boundaries and TAZs in the present may not occur in the future. The grouping process was repeated separately for each school type. 4) The grouped TAZs were dissolved into a single shape, creating a single CSA based on TAZ boundaries. The individual TAZs represented in each CSA boundary, according to school type, are listed in Tables 20, 21, and 22 of this document. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 58 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Attendance Boundary Maps Collier County Public School Facilities Element 63 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONES EFFECTIVE 2007 -2008 IIMMOKALEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE EFFECTIVE 2007 -2008 R 28E _. R29F O HIGHLANDS LAKE TRAFFORD ® PINECREST O VILLAGE OAKS u LJ ^ FWPIMo as oz os oa osM 1 C4� T <6 5 T 5 r, J Tl k /ell �lg!... �1 r i s "T ien x 7� , u LJ ^ FWPIMo as oz os oa osM 1 C4� T <6 5 T 5 MIDDLE SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONES EFFECTIVE 2007 -2008 HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONES EFFECTIVE 2007 -20081 R 25E _- _. R sE -._ __. R3]. -- — R]sE ® e xosrt nY ±µii'rwu..ww.s.nrr..a..n. �srrki Srhoo� — vieouxn �;IN�it / \ 2 a �IIIIII I U- ® 005 i i6z Milxs T ST T s T 8 T s T T 51 s EXHIBIT A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (1) February 23, 1999 (II) May 9, 2000 (III) November 19, 2002 (IV) September 10, 2003 (V) December 16, 2003 (VI) October 26, 2004 (VII) June 7, 2005 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99 -14 Ordinance No. 2000 -31 Ordinance No. 2002 -60 Ordinance No. 2003 -44 Ordinance No. 2003 -67 Ordinance No. 2004 -71 Ordinance No. 2005 -25 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. (VII) = Plan Amendment adopted on June 7, 2005 by Ordinance No. 2005 -25 Words underlined are added; words skaslkikreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I• INTRODUCTION CIE -1 If. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES CIE-2 *III. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects CIE —14 -17 Parks Projects CIE — 18 Storm -water Projects CIE —19 Water Projects CIE — 20 Solid -waste Projects CIE — 21 Sewer Projects CIE — 22 Library Buildings Projects CIE — 23 EMS Projects CIE — 24 Jail Projects CIE -25 * IV. COST AND REVENUES CIE — 26 -27 * V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION CIE — 28 -29 VI. ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Appendix A Capital Improvements Projects Appendix B Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Appendix C Collier County School Board Appendix D Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Appendix E Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Appendix F Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Appendix G Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities Adopted portions Words underlined are added; words stwak4hr%o are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 1. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase 'level of service" as "... an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J -5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE — 1 Words underlined are added; words strask through are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities , establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities and public school facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. (111) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE— 2 Words underlined are added; words stwsk thMugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q= (SxD) -I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. A. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. (II)(III)(Iv)(VI) B. The County Commission will review all rezone requests, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County -Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I, and the overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request, SRA designation, conditional use petition, or FLUE amendment, that significantly impacts either: (1) a deficient roadway segment or; (2) the BEBR high range growth rate population projections through the five years of the annually updated Capital Improvement Plan, on a continuously rolling basis, and then 95% of the BEBR high range growth rate thereafter, for the variable 'D ", unless one of the following simultaneously occurs: (VI) 1. Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone or SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or FLUE amendment, to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; (II) 2. The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) — I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; (VI) 3. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone, SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. (III)(VI) C. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County -Wide population greater than 3% of the population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 3 %of the adopted LOS standard service volume of an impacted roadway. (VI) = Plan Amendment adopted on October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 CIE— 3 Words underlined are added; words 6tRJGk4hF9u0 are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) D. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: (11) (111) 2. 3. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Manager. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as lone as the following conditions are met: a. the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and b. the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1.3: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1.1.4: Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: (111) 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, (111)2. previously approved development orders permitting new development, (111)3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and (111) 4. new development orders permitting new developments. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE — 4 Words underlined are added; words skUGIHpreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) D. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that maybe needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. Policy 1.1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: (III) Category A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, including state highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System FIRS) (III) Al Roadways: A1.1 Arterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated below on the basis of peak hour, traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport- Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette -Frank Road Goodlette -Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 Airport- Pulling Road Airport- Pulling Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road From Pine Ridge Road Airport- Pulling Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Collier Boulevard US 41 Pine Ridge Road US 41 US 41 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 To Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Logan Boulevard Old US 41 Golden Gate Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport- Pulling Road Airport - Pulling Road Radio Road Gulfshore Drive (111) A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour on all other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector roads. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE— 5 Words underlined are added; words sHUA thmugh are deleted (12/04107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (1))(11)(111) A2 State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FINS). In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1 -75. The standards for 1 -75 are as follows: EXISTING TRANSITIONING RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA 1 -75 IT— C C A3 County Surface Water Management Systems: A3.1 Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74 -50 and 90 -10. A3.2 Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. (1)(IV) A4 County Potable Water Systems: A4.1 County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day (III)(IV)A4.2 City of Naples = 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area City of Everglades - 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area A4.3 Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. (1) A5 County Sanitary Sewer Systems: (111) A5.1 County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day (III)(IV) A5.2 City of Naples = 145 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area A5.3 Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. (II) A6 County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: A6.1 Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years A6.2 Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. CIE – 6 Words underlined are added; words SIFU& thFOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (111) A7 County Parks and Recreation Facilities: A7.1 Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000 /pop. A7.2 Community Park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000 /pop. (111) A7.3 Recreation facilities = $240.00 capital investment per capita A8 Public School Facilities A8.1 Elementary schools = 95 percent of CSA /Permanent FISH Capacity A8.2 Middle schools = 95 percent of CSA /Permanent FISH Capacity A8.3 Hioh schools =100 Percent of CSA/Permanent FISH Capacity Category B Public Facilities: B1 County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita (1)(11)(111) B2 County Library Collection: 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 (111) B3 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) (111) B4 County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita (1 Unit/15,000 Population) (VI) 135 County General Government Buildings: 1.9 square feet per functional resident (weighted) (VI) = Plan Amendment adopted on October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 CIE— 7 Words underlined are added; words sFrusk- tpreugh are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide, or as provided by the School District within their five -year financially feasible Capital Improvement Plan. With the exception of public school facilities, fi-existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). (III) Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non - enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, and jail shall be financed from current revenues and assets (pay -as- you -go financing) and Revenue Bonds approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non - enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the Schedule of Capital improvements or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. (111) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE — 8 Words underlined are added; words are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) Policy 1.2.6: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. (II) Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation, Public Schools. EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, Public Schools. EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: A. Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; B. Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; C. Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non - Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. D. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13 %. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self- imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State - shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half -cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE— 9 Words underlined are added; words sttask- Nueugh are deleted (12104107 BCC Transmittal Hearing) PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. (III) Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition. (III) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE -10 Words underlined are added; words 64WSk 414FOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. (III) Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. C. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. groiects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the adopted LOS standard for schools Policy 1.4.23: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. (III) Policy 1.4.24: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (13.2) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). (VII) = Plan Amendment adopted on June 7, 2005 by Ordinance No. 2005 -25 CIE -11 Words underlined are added; words 61FUSk !hFough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (111) Policy 1.4.45: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans, final plats and building permits whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, or building permit shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1.5 Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. (Ilq(v)(vll)Policy 1.4.66: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5 -year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Figure PW -1, "Collier County Water District Boundaries ", and Figure PW -2, "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas ", in the Potable Water Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, and on Figure SS -1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries ", and Figure SS -2, "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas ", in the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public School improvements will be provided as designated on their respective Schedule of Capital Improvements appearing in the Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a County -Wide availability basis. CIE -12 Words underlined are added; words sirusk-thFough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J- 5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat or a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: (ill) A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or (III) B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur, pursuant to Section 163.3180 Florida Statutes. (III) Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or (111) B. At the time the final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat or building permit; or (111) C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE -13 Words underlined are added; words 644& 4hFough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (III)(V)Policy 1.5.3: The concurrency requirement of the Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or the contract for such facilities and services has been let at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are in the first or second year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements, and the Collier County Annual Budget adopted following each AUIR at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or D. The necessary facilities and services are in the first or second year of FDOT 5 -Year Work Program at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or E. The final local development order is for a project located within a TCEA or TCMA designated pursuant to this Plan and meets the applicable requirements of Policies 5.5 through 5.8 of the Transportation Element. F. The necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding commitment with the developer to contribute fair share funding as provided for in Policy 5.9 of the Transportation Element, if applicable, or to construct the needed facilities. Concurrence Management System is met: C. building permit is issued: or site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued: or D. The necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding commitment with the (V) = Plan Amendment on December 16, 2003 by Ordinance No. 2003 -67 CIE -14 Words underlined are added; words MFUG'k thFOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (11)(111) Policy 1.5.45.: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and Schedule of Capital Improvements. CIE -15 Words underlined are added; words strask thFaugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. All Public Facilities shall be consistent with the County's Capital Improvement Element pursuant to Section 163.3177 (3)(01., Florida Statutes. Note: See Capital Projects under separate PDF pg. 174-through 27 CIE -16 Words underlined are added; words stwek- HUSUgh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION _ Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. (III) 1. Development Order Review As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, and building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders having negative impacts on Category A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, building permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Category "A" public facilities are planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development during the next five fiscal years. (III) 2. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1.5. (111) 3. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. (111) 4. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvement Element. (111) 5. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process, the release of the official BEBR population estimates I ne upaate will mcluae: 1. Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; 4. Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the Service standards (111) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE 28 Words underlined are added; words sNask ikreugh are deleted 02/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 6. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. 78. Update of the PlAblis ssheel aed health facilities analysis. (III) 6. Concurrency Management System The County has established a Concurrency Management. Sy6t8FR by adeptien el the Adequate PubliG The system consists of the following: (III) A. The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this Element. The AUIR summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed projects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Category A public facilities, not including Public School Facilities, for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following the approval of the AUIR B. The review and adoption by reference of the School District's annually updated Five -Year Caoital Plan, which shall provide a financially feasible report on the ability of the School Capital Improvement Plan. R C. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 6 to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 of this Element. S D. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. (111) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 29 CIE Words underlined are added; words GtF61Glk thFgugh are deleted (12104/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) B E. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County -Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. 2. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. 434. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case -by -case monitoring, for the following reasons: a. annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. (III) 7. Second 5 -year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5 -year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5 -year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; b. Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and C. Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. (III) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 30 CIE Words underlined are added; words sFrask- thMugb are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) EXHIBIT A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted, October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended Ordinance No. ** October 28, 1997 Ordinance No. 1997 -56 (I) December 16, 2003 Ordinance No. 2003 -67 (II) January 25, 2007 ** *Ordinance No. 2007 -17 * ** Based on 2004 EAR, Evaluation and Appraisal Report ** This is the EAR -based amendment (1996 EAR). Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. * Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. (II) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2007 -17 on January 25, 2007 Words underlined are added; words sts ekthmugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (11) I. INTRODUCTION Decisions made, or policies pursued, by Collier County may influence decisions made or policies followed by: municipalities within, or adjacent to, Collier County; adjacent counties; the District School Board of Collier County; service delivery agencies; and, the various independent special districts located within, or adjacent to, Collier County. Decisions and policies of these entities may, in turn influence those of Collier County. Throughout its planning process, Collier County pursues coordination with the surrounding jurisdictions and agencies. The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, as amended, requires the inclusion of an element within local government comprehensive plans, that addresses coordination between units of government. This Intergovernmental Coordination Element is in accordance with the provisions of the Act. (11) The Collier County Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) contains a Goal, Objectives and Policies that deal with the following coordination issues: • Intergovernmental communications and level of service coordination • Coordination of land use planning strategies • Coordination of municipal annexation plans • Formal and informal coordination mechanisms (11) The Collier County Intergovernmental Service Delivery Agreement Report, completed in 2004, is an appendix to this Element. This report summarizes Collier County's interlocal agreements with governmental or quasi - governmental entities that provide services to Collier County residents. The Report summarizes service delivery agreements between Collier County and various providers, with regard to eight (8) service categories: 1) Education 2) Sanitary Sewer 3) Public Safety 4) Solid Waste 5) Drainage 6) Potable Water 7) Parks and Recreation, and 8) Transportation Facilities. (11) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words sHask4lxeugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (11) As of January 2005, there are three (3) municipalities within Collier County. These are: • Everglades City • City of Marco Island • City of Naples (II) Also as of January 2005, Collier County shared borders with the following jurisdictions: • City of Bonita Springs (in Lee County) • Lee County • Hendry County • Broward County • Miami -Dade County • Monroe County (II) In addition to Federal and State agencies, the following governmental entities have jurisdiction over all, or portions, of Collier County. The District School Board of Collier County Seminole Tribe of Florida Collier County Water -Sewer District Immokalee Water and Sewer District Florida Governmental Utility Authority Port of The Islands Community Improvement District Collier County Sheriff's Office Big Corkscrew Fire and Rescue District East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District Immokalee Fire Control District Isles of Capri Fire and Rescue District North Naples Fire Control District Ochopee Fire Control District South Florida Water Management District/Big Cypress Basin Board Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Cow Slough Water Control District Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Naples /Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Various Community Development District Various Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTU) Various Municipal Service Benefit Units (MSBU) (II) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words straekapreugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (11) GOAL: PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND THE USE OF ANY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION MECHANISMS WITH BROWARD, MIAMI -DADE, HENDRY, LEE AND MONROE COUNTIES, CITIES OF BONITA SPRINGS, EVERGLADES, MARCO ISLAND, AND NAPLES, THE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND ANY OTHER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL AGENCY OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND UTILITY COMPANIES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, SPRINT /UNITED TELEPHONE, IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION (MSTU), FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY, COMCAST, AND CABLEVISION INDUSTRIES, THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY COLLIER COUNTY'S LAND, ROAD OR FACILITY PLANNING, TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBLE AND COORDINATED PLANS. (11) OBJECTIVE 1: Collier County (County) shall continue to establish and maintain intergovernmental communication and level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by the County, Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, Monroe County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, the State of Florida, and any other entity that provides a service but may not have land use authority. (II) Policy 1.1: Collier County shall continue to utilize existing coordination mechanisms, e.g., interlocal planning agreements, joint meetings and any other mechanisms described in this Element, which promotes consistent planning activities. (II) Policy 1.2: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall be the designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments under review by the County, which have the potential to affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1. (II) Policy 1.3: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall continue to prepare and review the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as an annual level of service monitoring report for the capital facilities included within the Growth Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the necessary information to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. (11) Policy 1.4: In situations where other public or private entities are providing a facility or service within Collier County for roads, water, sewer, drainage, parks, public schools, or solid waste, the County will coordinate its adopted level of service standard(s) within the parameters allowed by the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element as part of the County's Growth Management Plan. (11) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 3 Words underlined are added; words 6tFU9lq Mredgh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (II) OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall coordinate its land use planning strategy, including an assessment of proposed development, with that of other governmental and private entities. (11) Policy 2.1: Collier County will continue to identify, develop, and pursue areas where intergovernmental land use planning and level of service agreements are needed between the County and respective governmental or private entities. (11) Policy 2.2: Collier County shall continue to develop intergovernmental planning agreements, which shall include provisions for review and comment(s) on Collier County land use plans and capital facility plans by neighboring governmental jurisdictions, regarding any proposed activities that may have an impact on such jurisdictions or cause inconsistencies with their respective comprehensive plans. (11) Policy 2.3: Collier County shall continue to participate in cooperative planning programs with other governmental entities. (11) Policy 2.4: Collier County shall continue to undertake, where appropriate and economically feasible, joint programs with other local governments regarding the planning for, and management of, natural resources that are shared by the County and adjacent governmental jurisdictions. (11) Policy 2.5: The County shall coordinate its plans, programs, regulations and activities for the provision of affordable housing with those of adjacent governments, particularly with the City of Naples. (1)(11) Policy 2.6: The County shall continue to coordinate with Tthe District School Board of Collier County for collaborative planning and decision making on Population projections the Public school site selection for new public educational plants and ancillary plants- facilities. arad the previsien et and the location and extension of Public facilities subiect to concurrence, to support existing and proposed public educational plants in accordance with the general Interlocal Agreement_ arinntari nn Mnv a gnns by tho Rnuior (SBR) Interlocal Agreement two Intedelsal AgFeements adopted' Statutes, 163.3177(6)(h) and 163.317-77, FlGFida on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. (II) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words sNask -H Fough are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) (Iq Policy 2.7: Collier County hereby adopts, as part of this Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Rule 291 -7, Florida Administrative Code, dates April 1994, which establishes a voluntary regional dispute process to reconcile differences on planning, growth management, and other issues among local governments, regional agencies and private interests. (11) Policy 2.8: The County shall coordinate with the South Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan. 2.9: the regulatory review of residential develooment for school concurrence, in accordance with Section 163.3180031 Florida Statutes. (11) OBJECTIVE 3: Collier County shall develop procedures to identify and implement joint planning areas for the purposes of municipal annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure service areas. (11) Policy 3.1: Based upon Section 9J -5.015 (3)(c) 4., Florida Administrative Code, Collier County shall work with the local municipalities to identify and implement joint planning areas and /or joint infrastructure service areas for the purpose of planning for potential future municipal annexation of such areas. The identified joint planning areas and /or joint infrastructure service areas shall be depicted on the County's Future Land Use Map series. (II) Policy 3.2: Collier County shall develop procedures to plan for potential future municipal incorporation (i.e., the creation of new municipalities) within Collier County. Upon official notification that an incorporation referendum for any portion of the County has been successful, the County will initiate contact with the new municipality for the purpose of establishing an expedient and efficient transition of responsibilities, services, and /or infrastructure to the new municipality. (11) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words StFU& thFOugh are deleted (12/04/07 BCC Transmittal Hearing) 4c A fye-r Co,r i-t'.iy DATE: TO: FROM: RE: November 20, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Marcia R. Kendall /Senior Planner BCC Advertisement Affidavit for CPSP- 2007 -7 GMPA Please be advised that due to the timeframe, copy of the advertisement affidavit is not available at this time. As soon as received, a copy of the affidavit will be placed in the notebooks prior to submittal to DCA. Thank you. Comprehensive Planning Department Monday, November 5, 2007 58'-- NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION Notice e hereby givnlidoutonn �1 n nR. mrlin C Ierr Cn Gverme Center. 3301 E. Taianl Boardroom, wth Management Plan. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the weed resolution is as follows: CONSIDERATION OF INTER -LOCAL AGREEMENT ' The purpose of the hearing is to consider an Inter -local Agreement between the District Schoot Board of Collier County and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida; Everglades City, a municipal corporation, the City of _ Maroo Island, a municipal corporation; and the City of Naples; also a municipal corporetion, to establish public school facility planning and school concurrency. This Is a companion hem to Petition CPSP- 2007 -7 Growth Management Plan MP) Amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, Intergovernmental ri ination Element, a new Public School Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan, being noticed under separate advertisement. interested parties are Invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Government Center, Fast Naples, Florida; and at Comprehensive Planning us artmem, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M.' 5 and .00 P.M., Monday titrouph Friday. Any questions pertaining to the document should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Department. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Oiflrw prior to November 13, 2807, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will heed a record of that' proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the.testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK - ,,,,,• By: /a/Patricia Morgan rlam*v Clark NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 In the Boardroom, 3" Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Centel 3301 E. Temlami Trail, Naples, Florida the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing to consider the Vansmittal of the following County Resolution for Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan: The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. r. The purposeofthe hearing is to considera recommendation fortrenmlttal of amendment to the Caphal Improvement Element and Inteerrggovernmental Coordination Element, ae well as the transmittal of a new element entitled Public School Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan. The RESOLUTION title Is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 07- TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. D CPSP- 2007 -7, Creating a new Public School Facilities Element with support document and amending the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Growth Management Plan to establish a public school concurrency program. This Is a companion Item to the School Concurrency Inter -local Agreement between the Collier County District School Board and Collier County Hoard of County Commissioners and the cities of Memo Island, Everglades and Naples. [Coordinator. Michele Mason, AICP, Principal Planner] AII Interested parties are invited to appear end be heard: Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments are available for Inspection d the Co" Oounty Clerk's OfAce, 4'^ floor, Adminiatretlon'Bullding, Collier County Government Center, Eeat Naples, Florida; antl et Comprehensive Planning Department, 2800. N. Horsaehoge Drive, Naples, qFl Ions peneIning to hose documa tsn houd bB direCtBd Sottha ComppreaFyiensive Planning Department. Written comments flied with the Clerk to the Board§ lNflce prior to November 13, 2007, will be read and considered at the public hearing. N a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with reaped to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such Purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Patricla Morgan Deputy Clerk .0 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Dailv Naples. FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they sen e as the authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that they m r a 5' n serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily; a daily newspaper published at Naples.. in Collier County; y Florida, distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida. that the attached cop} of the advertising, being a 3 PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 time in the issue on September 9w 2007 emmaa 1O o o ? �'a a�a s ..�■ ZF a�Is's i W J N V 3 J0 z a in w w o opp 3 V W�OIp v AM ant further says that the said Naples Daily \ears is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida. and that the said ne «spaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier - -- Cori Florida_ distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida. each dzx and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples_ in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I yrar next preceding the first publication oftheattached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor _.- promised anc person, firm or corporation any discount. rebate. P „ commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for q publication in the said newspaper. j ( Signature of affiant) D Sworn to and subscribed before me This 9th Day of September 2007 (Signatur • of notary, ubhc) FF159- 2578327 ,$z JUDYJANES ComMisSion DD 675029 �a Expires May 16, 2011 �R,,, °+ull6EfiNiMYFein liuu:eYipB�a3A6d016 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING Notice Is hereby g van that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 8:30 A.M. In the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, W Floor, Administration Building, County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation for transmittal of amendments to the Capital Improvement Element and Intorgovemmental Coordination Element, as well as the transmittal of a new element entttled Public School Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan. The RESOLUTION title is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 07- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY- COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO THE COWER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 8"5, AS AMENDED. PLAN, AND OF THESE COMMUNITY CPSP- 2007 -7, Creating a new Public School Facilities Element with support document and amending the Capital Improvement Element' and Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Growth Management Plan to establish a public school concurrency program. This Is a companion hem to the School Concurrency Inter -local Agreement between the Collier County District School Board and Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the cities of Marco Island, Everglades and Naples. [Coordinator: Michele Mosoa, AICP, Principal Planner] Alt Interested parties are Inked to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for inspection at the Comprehensive Planning Department, oies. 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Na Florida between the hours of 8:00 A. M. and 5:00 id with the Comprehensive Manning Department prior to September 20, read and considered at the public hearing. - If a person decides to appeal any decision made bythe Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proosedln is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Z tae. cwnpi FleMCu 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily g'000,door�o Sp Naples.. FL 3-1102 �'w a n c Affidavit of Publication State of Florida wrPAbO A'�c��V AOP VANV �S County of Collier �SOWUUVPOV�NN��N�%� i�u Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, p Y ersonall ° Ou AAN�.Op vr�l- bONU�b �bNNO�^ appeared B Lamb, who on oath says that Ute y �n i9w VNVNiO VIPV�%WCaP�UWWW�vN,Pmt�. serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, that the attached cony of the advertising. being a J o ? z 1' ud PUBLIC NOTICE � f in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE y� °. s r 1 9 3 = m was published in said newspaper I time in the issue on September 9" 2007 � � E .giant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples. in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County. Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, L g. ra each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post np ?, office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year nest preceding the first publication of the attached copy of u c advertisement. and afftant further sa7s that he has neither paid nor i `a promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, ^ °1 commission or refund for the purpose of securing this ads'ertisement for b YI publication in the said newspaper. `a 0 E0 0 onnnnnnn�nnmmmmww ]� °0000ioo2:mm� moo F. �, $ °" (Signature ofaffiant) n „g� �w� ���E�� ^�� o.G a;c�wo�a R 00�m°.9 o,7a,� O�Rac. af°5p m °a ,Z. Sworn to and subscribed before me __ ., n. This 9th Dal- of September 2007 (Signature of notan ublic) "i JUDYJANES - ' . Cornmission DD 875029 t t�',� Expires May 16, 2011 ., tA �a'+Gsdthry Tr aY1l6,201B003BB 7014 FEI59- 2578327 ew Hems Sunday, September 9, 2007• • 130 NOTICE OF PUBLIC Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday. September 20, 2007 at 8:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3'" Floor, Administration Building, County Govemment Center, 3301 Fast Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. CONSIDERATION OF INTER -LOCAL AGREEMENT All Interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the pr osegd amendments are available for InsDpaction at the - Comprehensive hourrsiof 8:00 A.M. and 2800 N. 5 00 P.M Monday through Friday.'Any questions pertaining the pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Department. (239 - 403 - 2400). Written comments filed with the Compre hensive Planning Department prior to September 20, 2007, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission -r n -.i ,. V r. —Teri i - -z arT —­ , �-, :Wile - Counts Florida NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples.. FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B, Lamb. who on oath says that they sen e as the Assistant Corporate Secretan of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples. in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper Itime in the issue on October 2"d 2007 lfiiani further says that the said Naples Daily News is a ne"spaper published at Naples, in snid Collier CounlN, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier C'ount\. Florida, distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida_ each day and has been entered ac second close nail matter at the post nl7ice in Naples. in said Collier Countv, Florida. for a period of 1 rear nest preceding the fit sl publication of the attached copy of t<heih con ent; and ail] air t further sat . -s that he has neither paid nor to Cowl .in\ person bon or corporation any discount, rebate, onus fission or refund for the purpose of securing this advert isemem for publication in the said newspaper. ( Signature of a ) Sworn to and subscribed before me This 2 " _ Dav of October 2007 L1,( -L k 14,I (Signatu e of notfij public) FEI59- 2578327 "r ni ap ,j GN o P. rt-'y (Cry ° o c yn. IL p°, ar 'M M i r-i 0 o a o � so o 'O ��, p �.nryG roon� [nN w w p°Q. N'y O_ o y amav a am ° w�N _brP W in' S nY y..7o r ' o N my - �. rcn y•: a.� w��v ° I� K: rn. N u' O O rt a w �. nzw G N O'CLp ?.wry 0..w N a cr e- m sow m w 0 o w on ,7p w �.p py.Cj ry^ JUYJANES Comm! son DD 675029 =7a= Expires May 16, 2011 ?�.�,(\ Bontletl Thmhoy Fain l,uurance8G0�&Stai9 'O w y w hl o���yav0002 ti O y'ry -� rq 1i so 5 ri .°w �°q o ° wom rt'�7'w ^o o Z M Ii fl r b 'o . m �'. ti x ... o f . siya ��r�o�mavro0 W p p b m 0. O d p O n. pj •- o Z o® JUYJANES Comm! son DD 675029 =7a= Expires May 16, 2011 ?�.�,(\ Bontletl Thmhoy Fain l,uurance8G0�&Stai9 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE FUTURE PUBLIC SCHOOLS PLANNING INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a Public Schools Planning Information Meeting held by Collier County Staff with the assistance of the Collier County School Board Staff on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 5:05 p.m. at the Board of County Commissioners Chambers 3'" floor of the W. Hannon Turner Building, Building F, Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL t Staff will be discussing the following public school related items: • Proposed future school sites • Projected demand /need for public schools • Timing of school construction and proposed opening dates • Public infrastructure impacts (e.g., roads, utilities, etc.) • Potential impacts on surrounding properties and neighborhoods • Potential impacts on residential permitting and land use items WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the future of our schools with County and School Board Staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, please visit our web site at www.collierdov.net/compplanning or contact Michele Mosca at 239 - 403 -2466 or at michelemoscaO collieruov.net . NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that they serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily, a dai1N newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 time in the issue on October 21 "_ 2007 Affant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naplrs. in said Collier Countv. Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County. Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, ush day and has been entered as sacond class mail matter at the post Mika in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of t vcar neat preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspap ( Signa e of affia -- �� Sworn to and subscribed before me This 2V'. Day of October 2007 (Signature of notary public�t EL A. MCDONALD .; Commission DD 650475 tea'...... i' Expires June 29,2011 R; ,�' saaoammTay Feinlndwra roaaesiata FEI 59- 2578327 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notloe le hereby tgan that a pubik: hewing will be held by the Collier County Planning Cbin lon on Thurs Novern er 1, 2007 at 8:30 A.M..In the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,.3o Floor, Administration Building, County Government ,Cerljer,3301 East Tamlami Treil, Naples; Florida. . The purpose of the hearing Is to consider a recommendation for transmittal of amendments to the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination .Element, as well as the transmittal of a new element eMftled Public School Facilities Element of the, Growth Management Plan. The RESOLUTION title is as follows: RESOLUTION 1`40.07- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PPnPnclNG AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH TO CPSP- 2007 -7, Creating a new Public School Facilities Element with support document and amending the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Growth Management Plan to establish a public school concurrency program. This Is a companion Item to the School Concurrency Inter -local Agreement between the Collier County District School Board and Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the cities of Marco Island, Everglades and Naples. [Coordinator. Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] All interested parties are Invited to appear and amendments are available for Inspection at the be directed to the comprehensive Nlenning uapartment t[3a- qurz4uuy. wrman comments filed with the Comprehensive Planning Department prior to November 1, 2007, will be read and considered at thetpubllc hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission S cnlllor CWnry Florian NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples. FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B. Lamb; who on oath says that they serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County. Florida, distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising. being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper I time in the issue on October 21", 2007 Arrant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier Counrv, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida_ distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the past office in Naples. in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement, and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount,rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advcrnsement for publication in the said newspaper /^1)j (Sign re of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This 21 ". Day of October 2007 (Signature of notary public) •; CHANELA. KDONALD +; Commission DD 651475 E)Ores June 29,2011 at,,fs FEI59- 2578;27 3 w o w. c o 3 9 w 00 S w O S p N o � o w y w" 3 N 2 . 6 n n Fr 3 f. F 3 n o c m c o o n w ^O T QS -� A o^ w O El- 0 m N m p^ m o a d o 3 w w 3 ^_ p -C) O N' a ^- T o " S N 0 c oa _ o- C o- n 3 o as "3 n u M �F N l Alt interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposneed amendments are available for Inspection at the Comprehensive hhours pf 8 00 A.Meand 2800 N. 5:00 P.M , Monday through Friday. Any q,�ansthe talning teo.tehrtese documents should be directed to the Com rehenslve Cqms prehensive Planning Department t prior to�November 1,12007W , w l be read and o rnsidered at the public hearing. if,g'psrson decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter wnsidered at such meeting or!hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based: Mark P. Strain,. Chairman - Collier County Planning Commission will be heldby the Collier County xw 1.2007'at 8:90 A.M. in the CONSIDERATION OF INTER -LOCAL AGREEMENT i eT'.m Collier County Florida g - Co *nr Count TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2007 HEARING DATE: October 18, 2007 RE: PETITION CPSP- 2007 -7, School Concurrency Growth Management Plan Transmittal Hearing — Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element, New Public School Facilities Element and Data and Analysis Report, and the Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Interlocal Agreement The Collier County Planning Commission previously received the Staff Report and the School District's versions of the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and Data and Analysis Report, proposed amendments to the County's Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE), and the School Concurrency Interlocal Agreement (ILA) at the September 6, 2007 CCPC meeting. Additionally, the CCPC received a supplemental packet containing County staffs versions of the Public School Facility Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element on or about September 16, 2007. Now, please find attached for your review and consideration the further revised Public School Facilities Element, Capital Improvement Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and the Interlocal Agreement, which include additional revisions proposed by County staff, as well as revisions agreed to by management of the School District and the County. These attached documents replace all previously provided versions. The following changes are those agreed to by upper- management from the School District and County Government: • PSFE - Policy 1.3.1 - Policy 1.3.2 - Objective 1.4 - Policy 1.4.1 • CIE - Policy 1.4.1 A. - Policy 1.5.4 C: "Adopted by reference..." - CIE page 28, #5: "Adopted by reference..." - CIE page 29, #613: "Adopted by reference... • ILA - Section 7.1 - Section 12.3 (b) - Section 13.8 (a) - Section 13.8 (a) (2) If you have any questions, please contact Michele Mosca in the Comprehensive Planning Department at 403 -2466 at your convenience. 2 o e-r County TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: September 20, 2007 RE: PETITION CPSP- 2007 -7, School Concurrency, Growth Management Plan Amendments (not part of the 2007 Cycle of GMP amendments — exempt from the twice per year amendments to the GMP per Section 163.3177(12) (i), Florida Statues). The Collier County Planning Commission has been provided the Staff Report in conjunction with the Inter -local Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency, new Public School Facilities Element and Support Document, and the Growth Management Plan amendments to the County's Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element. At this time there are outstanding issues identified in all related School Concurrency documents. Comprehensive Planning staff will be drafting alternative language to address the deficiencies cited in the Staff Report. Staff anticipates that the alternative language will be provided to the Commission by September 14, 2007 in order to allow sufficient review time prior the September 20, 2007 meeting. If you have any questions pertaining to the forthcoming alternative language, please contact me at 403 -2466 at your convenience. Agenda Item 8.A. Co r Co>y.-nty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: September 20, 2007 RE: PETITION CPSP - 2007 -7, School Concurrency, Growth Management Plan Amendments (not part of the 2007 Cycle of GMP amendments — exempt from the twice per year amendments to the GMP per Section 163.3177(12) (i), Florida Statues). (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) AGENT /APPLICANT: The District School Board of Collier County Facilities Management 5775 Osceola Trail Naples, FL 34109 Comprehensive Planning Department Community Development and Environmental Service Division Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The proposed Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments and Inter -local Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency are not site specific. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the County is required to adopt an Inter -local Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency, and amend its Growth Management Plan, including adding a new Public School Facilities Element and Support Document, and amending the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element, to establish and implement a school concurrency program within Collier County. BACKGROUND AND PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS, The 2005 Florida Legislature, in Senate Bill 360, enacted legislation amending Sections 163.3180 and 163.3177, F.S., requiring the implementation of a public school concurrency program. The implementation of the program will require coordinated planning among the County, the three municipalities and the District School Board of Collier County, the result of which will be a collaborative and financially feasible process to ensure that adequate school capacity is available at the time of residential impact. Agenda Item 8.A. Pursuant to State requirements, Collier County must adopt a school concurrency program that is internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan no later than March 1, 2008. Thereafter, the County is required to incorporate the Comprehensive Plan amendments into the Land Development Code within 180 days from the effective date of the School Concurrency Growth Management Plan amendments. STAFF ANALYSIS: The District School Board of Collier County retained the consulting services of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. to prepare the requisite Inter -local Agreement, new Public School Facilities Element and Support Document, and amendments to the local governments' Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element, to establish and implement a school concurrency program within the County, as mandated by the State. County staff has prepared the following analysis to provide the Planning Commission with an outline of the statutory requirements for each component of School Concurrency and to detail any deficiencies. 1. Inter -local AnrP.prnn tt III M fnr Pnhlin Qrhnnl FonilB.. Di-- -.... The School District, County and municipalities must enter into an inter -local agreement to share information on matters such as, but not limited to, school enrollment figures; school capacities; plans for new schools, school expansions, and school closures; population projections; and projected new residential developments. Sections 163.31777(2)(a) —(i) and 163.3180 (13)(g)(1) -(8), F.S. require at a minimum the ILA address the following: a) A process by which each local government and the district school board agree and base their plans on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The geographic distribution of jurisdiction -wide growth forecasts is a major objective of the process. b) A process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned public school facilities, including school renovations and closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment. c) Participation by affected local governments with the district school board in the process of evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and new school site selection before land acquisition. Local governments shall advise the district school board as to the consistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, including appropriate circumstances and criteria under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. d) A process for determining the need for and timing of onsite and offsite improvements to support new, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools. The process must address identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements. e) A process for the school board to inform the local government regarding the effect of comprehensive plan amendments on school capacity. The capacity reporting must be consistent with laws and rules relating to measurement of school facility capacity and must also identify how the district school board will meet the public school demand based on the facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. Agenda Item 8.A. I) Participation of the local governments in the preparation of the annual update to the district school board's 5 -year district facilities work program and educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. g) A process for determining where and how joint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency. h) A procedure for the resolution of disputes between the district school board and local governments, which may include the dispute resolution processes, contained in chapters 164 and 186. i) An oversight process, including an opportunity for public participation, for the implementation of the interlocal agreement. 1. Establish the mechanisms for coordinating the development, adoption, and amendment of each local government's public school facilities element with each other and the plans of the school board to ensure a uniform district -wide school concurrency system. 2. Establish a process for the development of siting criteria which encourages the location of public schools proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and seeks to co- locate schools with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers to the extent possible. 3. Specify uniform, district -wide level -of- service standards for public schools of the same type and the process for modifying the adopted level- of-service standards. 4. Establish a process for the preparation, amendment, and joint approval by each local government and the school board of a public school capital facilities program which is financially feasible, and a process and schedule for incorporation of the public school capital facilities program into the local government comprehensive plans on an annual basis. 5. Define the geographic application of school concurrency. If school concurrency is to be applied on a less than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, the agreement shall establish criteria and standards for the establishment and modification of school concurrency service areas. The agreement shall also establish a process and schedule for the mandatory incorporation of the school concurrency service area and the criteria and standards for establishment of the service areas into the local government comprehensive plans. The agreement shall ensure maximum utilization of school capacity, taking into account transportation costs and court- approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. The agreement shall also ensure the achievement and maintenance of the adopted level - of- service standards for the geographic area of application throughout the 5 years covered by the public school capital facilities plan and thereafter by adding a new fifth year during the annual update. Define the geographic application of school concurrency. If school concurrency is to be applied on a less than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, the agreement shall establish criteria and standards for the establishment and modification of school concurrency service areas. The agreement shall also establish a process and schedule for the mandatory incorporation of the school concurrency service area and the criteria and standards for establishment of the service areas into the local government comprehensive plans. The agreement shall ensure maximum utilization of school capacity, taking into account transportation costs and court - approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. The agreement shall also ensure the achievement and maintenance of the adopted level - of- service standards for the geographic area of application throughout the 5 years covered by the public school capital facilities plan and thereafter by adding a new fifth year during the annual update. 6. Establish a uniform districtwide procedure for implementing school concurrency which provides for: a. The evaluation of development applications for compliance with school concurrency requirements, including information provided by the school board on affected schools, impact on levels of service, and programmed improvement for affected schools and any options to provide sufficient capacity. Agenda Item 8.A. b. An opportunity for the school board to review and comment on the effect of comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings on the public school facilities plan; and c. The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency system. 7. Include provisions related to amendment of the agreement. 8. A process and uniform methodology for determining proportionate -share mitigation pursuant to subparagraph (e) 1 (below). (s. 163.3180 (e) 1. — Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a public school facility; or the creation of mitigation banking based on the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options must include execution by the applicant and the local government of a binding development agreement that constitutes a legally binding commitment to pay proportionate- share mitigation for the additional residential units approved by the local government in a development order and actually developed on the property, taking into account residential density allowed on the property prior to the plan amendment that increased overall residential density. The district school board shall be a party to such and agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a development agreement, the local government may require the landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon its expiration.) Staff has determined the ILA is deficient and does not adequately address the provisions of the Florida Statutes, as outlined above. The following is an analysis of the major deficiencies in the ILA: District School Board's Capital Improvement Plan Reference: ILA Subsection 13.5 Deficiencies: The proposed ILA does not include a process for the affected local government's approval of a public school capital facilities program which is financially feasible, as required by s. 163.3180 (13) (g) 4., F.S. Potential Impact(s): Failure to allow approval by local governments and the school district of a public school capital facilities program may result in disjointed facility planning and internal inconsistencies in a local governments' capital improvement element; Ch. 163, F.S., requires internal consistency. Co- location and Shared Use Opportunities Reference: ILA Subsection 10.1 Deficiencies: The proposed ILA does not include a process for determining where and howjoint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency, as required by Sections 1013.33 (3)(g) and 163.31777 (2)(g), F.S. Potential Impact(s): Failure to identify a process that determines where and how joint use of facilities may be shared may result in an inefficient use of resources. Supporting Infrastructure: Reference: ILA Subsection 7.1 Deficiencies: The proposed ILA does not include a process for determining the need for, and timing of, onsite and offsite improvements to support new, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools, and does not include a process for the identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements, as required by Sections 1013.33 (3)(d) and 163.31777 (2)(d), F.S. Potential Impact(s): Failure to identify needed infrastructure for public school facilities early in the planning stages, as well as establishing a cost sharing arrangement between the District and County for needed improvements, may result Agenda Item 8.A. in major unanticipated financial expenditures for the District, County, or both agencies. Alternative Review Process Reference: ILA Subsection 12.3 b. Deficiencies: The proposed ILA does not provide a mechanism for the continuation of the in -effect School Board Review (SBR) ILA (adopted in May 2003 by the District School Board and Collier County Board of County Commissioner). Although not a required component of the School Concurrency ILA, Florida Statutes allow school districts and local governments to enter into agreements to address school review processes, off -site improvements, etc. Potential Impact(s): All planned and proposed development of the School Board is subject to the mandates of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. The current SBR ILA defines the process and associated limits to the application of those standards and mandates. Absent a defined school review process, development delays and level of service standards deficiencies may result. Staff will provide an addendum to this Staff Report prior to the September 20, 2007 CCPC hearing, which will include recommended text changes to the ILA. 2. Public School Facilities Element (PSFE): The County and the municipalities must modify their comprehensive plans by adding a public school facilities element that codifies the provisions in the inter -local agreement. The PSFE must include provisions such as, but not limited to, rules for determining, and establishing, the level of service standards (LOSS) for each type of school (elementary, middle and high schools) within the County, and the geographic areas (concurrency service areas — CSAs) in which school concurrency shall be applied. Section 163.3177 (12)(d) -(h), Florida Statutes, requires that the PSFE include the following: (d) The element shall contain one or more goals which establish the long -term end toward which public school programs and activities are ultimately directed. (e) The element shall contain one or more objective for each goal, setting specific, measurable, intermediate ends that are achievable and mark progress toward a goal. (f) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which establish the way in which programs and activities will be conducted to achieve and identified goal. (g) The objective and policies shall address items such as! 1. The procedure for an annual update process; 2. The procedure for school site selection; 3. The procedure for school permitting; 4. Provision for infrastructure necessary to support proposed schools, including potable water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, transportation, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization; 5. Provision for co- location of other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, in proximity to schools; 6. Provision for location of schools proximate to residential areas and to complement the patterns of development, including the location of future school sites so they serve as community focal points; .. 7. Measures to ensure compatibility of school sites and surrounding land uses; S. Coordination with adjacent local governments and the school district on emergency preparedness issues, including the use of public schools to serve as emergency shelters; and 9. Coordination with the future land use element. Agenda Item 8.A. (h) The element shall include one or more future conditions maps which depict the anticipated location of educational and ancillary plants, including the general location of improvements to the existing schools or new schools anticipated over the 5 -year or long -term planning period. Maps indicating general locations of future schools or school improvements may not prescribe a land use on a particular parcel of land. Staff has determined the PSFE is deficient. The Goal, Objectives and Policies within the Element fail to adequately address the following requirements of the Florida Statutes and 9J- 5.025, F.A.C. • Goal: Goal 1 is not all inclusive as it does not address coordination. • Objectives: Objective 1.3 must be separated into multiple Objectives with corresponding Policies. • Policies: Policy 1.3.3 does not provide measures to ensure compatibility of school sites and surrounding land uses. Policy 1.3.3 A. belongs with a policy that addresses supporting infrastructure. Policies are not included in the PSFE to address Rule 9J- 5.025(3)(c) 4. - coordination of school site selection and permitting. Policy 1.3.6 does not adequately address Rule 9J- 5.025(3)(c) 3. — coordination of the annual review of the element with the school board, the county, and applicable municipalities; coordination of annual review of school enrollment projections, and establishing procedures for the annual update process. Staff will provide an addendum to this Staff Report prior to the September 20, 2007 CCPC hearing, which will include recommended tent changes to the PSFE. 3. PSFE Data and Analysis Reoort• The Public School Facilities Element shall be based upon data and analyses that address, among other items, how level -of- service standards will be achieved and maintained. Such data and analyses must include, at a minimum, such items as: 1. The inter -local agreement adopted pursuant to s_ 163.31777 and the 5 -year school district facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35; 2. The educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.31 and an existing educational and ancillary plant map or map series; 3. Information on existing development and development anticipated for the next 5 years and the long -term planning period; 4. An analysis of problems and opportunities for existing schools and schools anticipated in the future; 5. An analysis of opportunities to co- locate future schools with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers; Agenda Item 8.A. 6. An analysis of the need for supporting public facilities for existing and future schools; 7. An analysis of opportunities to locate schools to serve as community focal points; 8. Projected future population and associated demographics, including development patterns year by year for the upcoming 5 -year and long -term planning periods; and 9. Anticipated educational and ancillary plants with land area requirements. Staff has determined the Data and Analysis Report contains deficiencies that, if not corrected prior to Adoption, would result in a recommendation of denial by staff at the Adoption hearing. The Report fails to adequately address the following, as required by Florida Statutes and 9J- 5.025 (2)(f), F.A.C. The Data and Analysis Report provides a general analysis on problems and opportunities with existing public school facilities and projected public school facilities relative to supporting infrastructure, co- location of schools with other public facilities, and the location of public schools to serve as community focal points. However, Rule 9J -5.025 (2)(f), F.A.C. specifically requires an "analysis of problems and opportunities with existing public school facilities and projected public school facilities planned in the adopted district facilities work program [underline added for emphasis], including location, supporting infrastructure, and overcrowding in relation to achieving and maintaining level of service standards for the five -year planning period and for the end of the long range planning period of the host county, including: opportunities and problems in collocating existing projected public school facilities with other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community center; the need for supporting infrastructure, including, focal points [underline added for emphasis]." The requisite analysis has not been provided for existing facilities, nor High School "EEE" and Elementary Schools "O" and "Q," which are included in the District's facilities work program — to be adopted on September 20, 2007 by the District School Board of Collier County. 4. Capital Improvement Element (CIE) — F.S. 163.3177 and 9J- 5.016. F.A.C: The County must amend its CIE to include provisions, which set forth a financial feasible public school capital facilities plan, demonstrating that the adopted LOSS will be achieved and maintained. Staff has determined the proposed changes to the CIE set forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities plan, as described above. However, the District's CIP, as proposed, includes the opening of Schools "EEE" and "O" in year 2012 — within the County's 5 -year planning period. Both schools will require roadway improvements for access and to accommodate additional traffic impacts, which are not scheduled in the County's 5 -year CIE. (The estimated road construction cost of Vanderbilt Beach Road extension from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard ( ±5.05 miles) to accommodate the anticipated traffic needs of School "EEE" is approximately 25 million dollars per mile. Additionally, the estimated road construction cost of County Barn Road from Davis Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road (2 miles) to accommodate anticipated traffic impacts from School "O" is approximately 42 million dollars.) Therefore, the inclusion of the District's CIP in the County's CIE, without an identified funding source for the needed infrastructure improvements for the schools listed, would cause the CIE not to be financially feasible. Agenda Item 8.A. Staff recommends modifying the proposed Policies in the CIE to strengthen provisions to require coordinated planning between the County and the School District. Staff will provide an addendum to this Staff Report prior to the September 20, 2007 CCPC hearing, which will include recommended text changes to the CIE. 5. Interaovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) — F S 163 3177 (6)(h)• The County must amend its ICE to include provisions that identify the principles and guidelines to be used in the coordination of the County's Comprehensive Plan with the plans of the School Board, such as joint processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting, the location and extension public facilities subject to concurrency, and siting facilities with countywide significance. Additionally, the ICE must state that the coordination with the School Board is pursuant to the ILA and must also state the obligations of the local government under the Agreement. Staff has determined the proposed changes to the ICE are sufficient and meet the intent of the applicable Florida Statutes. However, staff recommends modifying Policy 2.6 to remove redundant text, `the provision of infrastructure, particularly roads," and include a reference to the proposed amended Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency Inter -local Agreement. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS A NIM is not required for Growth Management Plan amendments which are not site specific, per Section 10.03.05 F. of the Land Development Code. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This staff report has been reviewed and approved by the Office of the County Attorney. In accordance with Florida Statutes, the County is required to establish and implement of School Concurrency Program. If the County fails to adopt a Program, the State has the option of imposing financial sanctions and prohibiting the County from adopting Comprehensive Plan amendments that would increase residential density. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward the new Public School Facilities Element and Support Document, the School Concurrency Growth Management Plan amendments and the Inter -local Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency, with staff recommended revisions, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. (Transmittal is recommended with the understanding that if a mutual agreement on outstanding issues is not reached between Collier County and the District School Board by time of Adoption, a staff recommendation of denial will be forthcoming or, in the alternative, if possible, an approval of a version proposed by Collier County that is consistent with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J -5, F.A.C.) Agenda Item 8.A. PREPARED BY: xi 'z DATE: s 0 7- M R. M AICP MPREE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: 0 7 DAVID WEEKS, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED B RANDY C HEN, AICP, DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: —l- S' (n 7 •n�t� U 'U DATE: MARJ IE M. STUDENT-STIRLING ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: EPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & VIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PETITION NO.: CPSP- 2007 -7 Staff Report for the September 20, 2007, CCPC Meeting. DATE: -) - 5-o ?- NOTE: This petition has been advertised for the October 23, 2007, BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN G: CompUomp. Pan AmWmeft=07 I Ad at t A I Table of Contents for the Interlocal Agreement 3.1 Staff Working Group 3.2 Meetina of Elected Officials Section 4. Student Enrollment and Population Proiections 7 4.1 Projection Coordination 4.2 Student Enrollment Proiections 4.3 Sub - County Plannina Sectors 4.4 Student Generation Multipliers 4.5 Population Proiections Section 5. Coordinating and Sharing of Information g 5.1 Capital Improvements Plan 5.2 Growth and Development Trends Section 6. School Site Selection and School Remodeling Review 9 6.1 School Site Selection and School Remodeling 6.2 Site Selection Review 6.3 Timing Section 7. Supporting Infrastructure ................ 12 Section 8. Local Agency Review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments Rezoninas and Developments of Regional Impact ....... .... 12 8.1 School District Representation on the Local Planning Agency 8.2 Notification of Potential Enrollment Impacts 8.3 School District Response 8.4 Insufficient Capacitv 8.5 Review Criteria 8.6 Community Development Section 9. Educational Plant Survey .... 14 r Words underlined are added; words sga& IhFsugh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words e sh mh tyrengltare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Section 10. Co- Location and Shared Use ................................................... .............................14 Section 11 Citizen Advisory Oversight Group ............................................. .............................14 11.1 Establishment 11.2 Membership 11.3 Duties 11.4 Organization Section 12. Site Plan Review for Schools ................................................... .............................16 12.1 School Site Plan Review 12.2 Local Government Approval 12.3 Alternative Review Process Section 13 Requirements for the School Concurrence Program ................. .............................14 13.1 School Concurrence Established 13.2 Level of Service 13.3 Concurrence Service Area Boundaries 13.4 Specific Responsibilities of the School District 13.5 School District's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 13.6 Tentative Educational Facilities Plan 13.7 Specific Responsibilities of the County and Cities 13.8 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments 13.9 School Concurrence Regulations 13.10 Commencement of School Concurrence Section 14. Uniform School Concurrence Process ...................................... .............................22 14.1 General Provisions 14.2 School Concurrencv Application Review 14.3 School Concurrencv Approval 14.4 Development Review Table 14.5 Proportionate Share Mitioation 14.6 Appeal Process Section 15. Special Provisions .................................................................... .............................28 Words underlined are added; words simak thFeegh are deleted Words double underling— added; words e deleted —both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 15.1 School District Requirements 15.2 Land Use Authority Section 16. Resolution of Disputes 29 Section 17 Amendment of the Agreement 29 Section 18. Execution of the Agreement 29 Section 19. Termination of the Agreement 29 Section 20. Entire Agreement ........ 30 Section21. Effective Date ........................................................................... .............................30 Signature Pages ................. ... .. .... 30-34 Appendix ............. .......... 35 38 Appendix "A° — Concurrencv Service Area (CSA) Maps Appendix "B" — School District Student Generation Multiplier Appendix "C — School Concurrencv Review Process Flow Chart Appendix "D" — Calendar of Kev Annual Deadlines Words underlined are added; words sn ough are deleted Words double under! ned are added; words Aexbk ~jj dwsugh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY This Interlocal Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement" is entered into by and between the following parties: The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County "): Everglades City, a municipal corporation: the City of (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Cities "): - and the District School Board of Collier County, €Lerida (hereinafter referred to as the "School ReardDistrict "). The Countv, the Cities, and the School District—,tegethef- are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Parties'_. WHEREAS, the Parties recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well -being of the children of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the benefits to the citizens and students of their community by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs to ensure rp omote: (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development; (2) greater efficiency for the Parties 8Gh9Gl 13eaFd and the County by through the placement of schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, parks, and drainage systems; (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the --road and sidewalk construction programs ei the Geunty; (4) the location and design of schools so that they serve as community focal points; (5) the location and design of schools with parks, ballfields, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage of joint use opportunities; and (6) the location of new schools and expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to reduce pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that it is necessary and appropriate for the to provide capacity for proiected new growth: and WHEREAS, Section1013.33 (10), Florida Statute6F_S., requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the County and Cities, (hereinafter together referred to as the "Local Governments ") ; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h) 1 and 2, Florida StatuterF_S., require each Loocal Ggovernment's comprehensive plan include to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element stating the principles and guidelines to be used in the to accomplishment ef-the coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the School DistrictSefaeel-Beard, and describe the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2, €!er-ida SfatatesF_S., further requiredss each Words underlined are added; words s�ek- Hxengk are deleted Words double are added; words mare deleted -- both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) the Parties to establish by interlocal or other formal agreement, executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described above consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination element; and WHEREAS. the Local Governments are entering into this Agreement in reliance on the Local Governments to add enough capacity to the Plan in each succeeding fifth year to address projected growth In order to maintain the adopted level of service standard and to Plan amendments rezonings and other development orders that generate students and impact the Public school system and the Cities have similar jurisdiction within their boundaries; and WHEREAS. the School District has the statutory and constitutional responsibility to provide a uniform system of free and adequate public schools on a countywide basis and WHEREAS, the Parties enter into this Agreement in fulfillment of the above referenced statutory requirements and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and students described above; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 163.01, Seetien- 163.3177(6)(h)2., and Sesti R 1013.33(2)(a), F19Fida StaWtesF_S.; and WHEREAS, upon the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) acceptance of this Agreement, and upon the commitment of the Parties hereto to abide by and seek fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, that -DCA shall recognize the Agreement as fully satisfying €lAFida Statutes Sections 1013.33 and 163.3177 F.S. . requirements for cooperative planning for all Parties involved, both individually and collectively. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the public benefits to be realized from the coordinationg -_and review of public educational facilities' planning and the use of a school concurrence system, the Parties hereby agree as follows: Wards underlined are added; words s gh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words dexbla*Ewek- dwo*ghti a deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Heating) Section 1. Recitals The foregoing recitals are adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. The following definitions and procedures will be used to coordinate public facilities planning, afO -land use planning and school concurrence: Section 2. Definitions Ancillary Facilities: The building site and site improvements necessary to provide support services to a school district's educational program including, but not limited to vehicle storage and maintenance warehouses or administrative buildings. Applicant: For the purposes of school concurrence any person or entity undertaking a residential development. Attendance Boundary: The geoaraohic area which is established to identify the public school assianment of students residina within that area. Capital Plan. available to service a development. Charter School: An alternative public school authorized pursuant to Section 1002.33, F.S. and built to meet the State Reauirements for Educational Facilities standards when used as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Option. Class Size Reduction: As provided in Article IX, Section 1, of the Florida Constitution_ as amended a provision to ensure that by the beginning of the 2010 school year, there are a sufficient number of classrooms in a public school so that: exceed 18 students: 2. The maximum number of students who are assigned to each teacher who is teaching in public school classrooms for grades 4 through 8 does not exceed 22 students: and Words underlined are added; words sa ek- dmsugb are deleted Words double underlined are added; words &vblea�are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6107 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 3. The maximum number of students who are assigned to each teacher who is teaching in public school classrooms for grades 9 through 12 does not exceed 25 students. Comprehensive Plan: As provided by Section 163 3164(4) F S as amended a plan that meets the requirements of 163.3177 and 163 3178 F.S. Concurrence: As provided for in the Florida Administrative Code Rule 9J-5.003, the reviewed for school concurrence purposes Consistency: As provided by Section 163 3194 F.S. Development: As provided by Sections 163.3164(6) and 380 04 F.S. Developer: As provided by Section 163.3164(5) F.S. Development Permit: As provided by Section 163.3164(8). F.S. planning period. Words underlined are added; words soh me deleted Words double and rlin d are added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Exempt Local Government: A municipality which is not required to participate in 163.31777(1)(c), F.S. Financial Feasibility: As provided in Section 163.3164(32), F.S., as amended, maintained within the period covered by the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements. on a percentage of the total number of existing student stations and a designated size for each program. Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) Student Count — Fall Semester: A fall semester count of all `lull -time equivalent' students, pursuant to Section 1011.62, F.S. Governmental Agency: As provided by Section 163.3164 00), F.S. Governing Body: The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the Councils of the incorporated municipalities or any other chief governing body of a unit of local characteristics of the facility. Local Government: Collier County and /or the Cities located within its the County boundary pursuant to Section 163.3164 (13), F.S. Words underlined are added; words seaek thfexgk are deleted Words do ,bloom are added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) enrollment district -wide. Permanent Classroom: An area within a school that provides instructional space for the maximum number of students in core - curricula courses which are assigned to a teacher based on the constitutional amendment for class size reduction and is not moveable. Permanent Student Station: The floor area in a permanent classroom required to house a Department student in an instructional program as determined by the Florid of d l atlon FB®(i. peen aaaressea. Section 163.3180(13)(e) F.S. Proposed New Residential Development: Any application for new residential development or any amendment to a previously approved residential development which results in an increase in student impacts Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of dwelling units in whole or in part for human habitation School Board: The governing body of the School District a political subdivision of the State of Florida and a body corporate pursuant to Section 1001 40 F.S. School District of Collier County: The School District created and existina pursuant to Section 4 Article IX of the State of Florida Constitution type ang whether the proposed development is conceptually approved or vested Words underlined are added; words ugh are deleted Work dnuble m derlined are added; words J %A le Sk m@'- dw ewSh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) time, as permitted by the F.S. historic and projected growth rates. Type of School: Schools providing the same level of education i.e elementary, middle, high school, or other combination of grade levels. Section 23. Joint Workshop Meetings 23.1 Staff Working Group (SWG). A staff working group with up to four staff-level representatives from theeach Local Govern mentGeuaty_and the School District will meet on an as needed basis, but no less frequently than hvise -four times per year, to formulate recommendations and discuss issues regarding coordination of land use, and ssheel educational facilities y, Local Government capital improvements planning, 4wAudiag- suGhand issues such as population and student enrollment projections, development trends, school needs, co- location and joint use opportunities, and aneiiiaFy infrastructure improvements needed to support the schools. The SWG will also be responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on the School District Five -Year Capital IIMU[Qyerllent Plan. and Representatives from the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. The School District—staff, in coordination with the Local Governments' 6gw*Managers, or their designees (or the Mayor if there is not a Manaaer), will be responsible for appointing their respective staff representatives to the SWG. , Tthe process for meeting arrangements and notification will be as established by a majeriiy-ef -the members of the werkiRg jq)upSWG • ePA. 2.23.2 Meeting of Elected Officials. One or more of the elected members of the County Commission, City Council for each CiN and the School Board will -shall Words underlined are added; words sbaelcfreugh are deleted Words double are added; words ire deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) meet. at a minimum, every other year in a publicly noticed joint workshop session. Additional pUblic workshops may be held upon request by one of the Parties to the Agreement . The joint workshop sessions will be opportunities for the BeaFdParties to build consensus, and set direction regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including, but not limited to the following: population and student estimates and projections, development trends, school needs, off site improvements, and joint use opportunities. The Local GovernmentGGm#y- Managers and School BeaFd SupeFiRtendeRLDistrict will be jointly responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing kqbk notification for the joint workshops. Section 34. Student Enrollment and Population Projections 4.1 Projection Coordination. In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the Ceu+l#yLocal Governments and the School District Ssbeek-geard- -agree to coordinate their respective plans to include capital improvement plans and future land use plans based upon agreed -upon the Local Governments' population projections distribution of pop Ration growth . and at the amount 4f, residential units batype single family, multi - family, t . ?and the School District's distribution of sWUMLpopulation growth and student enrollment. 4.2 . _Student Enrollment Projections. The School District Rear shall utilize the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) five -year county -wide student enrollment projections. The Scheel ReaFdSchool District may request that the FDOE projections be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment and development trends not anticipated by the FDOE projections using the COHORT Projections Waiver available on the FDOE website. In formulating such a request, the School District Ssheel­-@eard -will coordinate with the Local Governments Geunty- regarding future population projections and growth. Five -year population and student enrollment projections shall be revised annually to ensure that new residential development and redevelopment information provided by the GewPAy Local Governments are reflected in the updated projections. The student enrollment 334.3 Sub - County Planning Sectors. Staff from the Local Governments Geuiclp,, sta#, in coordination with the-School District staffSeheel-@eard, will use information on Gelfaty-growth and development trends f9F WRIRGEWPIDFated aFeas data, such as census iaferraatier -er*-population and housing characteristics, census persons - per- household figures, historic and projected growth rates, and the information described in Subsection 45.2 of this Agreement, to project residential units by type fer dive Yeats (single family, multi - family and mobile home) for five years and allocate these units into sub - county planning sectors, such as stue^t a#endw^GG zonesConcurrency Service Areas (CSAs) consistent with county -wide projections. The planning sectors will be established by mutual consent of the Scheel SeaFd Words underlined are added; words sEr & thfengh me deleted Words double underlined are added; words dexbleetwwk- Owamgh are deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) School Facilities Element (PSFE). The allocation of residential units by type and planning sector will be provided to the School District School Bearcl by September 1 st of each year. 4.4 — Student Generation Multipliers (SGM). The School District -will evaluate the planning sector projections prepared by the 6eua#y1ocal Governments pursuant to Section 4.3 above. The S&091 BeaFd, WOFI(ORg With. Governments. The SGM is then applied to different school types including, but not limited to, traditional public elementary, middle and high schools, as well as other combinations of grade levels. The Section 45. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 5.1 By November list of each year, the School BeaFd District shall submit to the Local The RepeFt –CIP will contain information in tabular, graphic, and textual formats detailing existing and projected school enrollment, existing educational facilities, their locations, the number of portable units (hereinafter 'portables ") in use at each school, and projected facility needs. The Gapital CIP shall also contain the School Districts Five -Vow planned facilities with funding over the next 5 years, and a description of any unmet needs. The Reper�-ClP will -shall provide data for each individual school concerning school capacity based on FDOE criteria and enrollment of each individual school based on actual student counts. The RepeFFCIP Words underlined are added; words s"ek thmugh are deleted Words double underlin n are added; words Aenbleetwrek-tfue A Are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) wW -shall show the generalized locations in which new schools will be needed, along with planned renovations, expansions and closures of existing schools. The CIP Repent -w4- hall indicate propertyies the School Sea+d District has already acquired through develeW8kplicant donation, eF— properlyies for which there is an develepeFApplicant obligation to provide property to the SsheeF- SeaFdSchool District, at the School Districtm —H's discretion;, eF -and propertyies acquired through other means that are potential school sites. 4.25.2 Growth and Development Trends_a 9FBl_September 1st of each year, the CeuRty -Local Governments will provide the School Beard District with a report on annual growth and development trends. The report will contain information in tabular, graphic and textual formats and will include information regarding development approvals for the preceding year as follows: (a) the type, number, and location of residential dwelling units which have received zoning approval, final subdivision plat approval, or site plan approval; (b) a summary of all comprehensive plan amendments to include a description of any land use changes and the location of the affected area; (c) the number of new residential dwelling units permitted and the location of such residential dwelling units; (d) information regarding the conversion or redevelopment of housing or other structures into residential dwelling units which are likely to generate new students: and (e) identification of any development orders issued which contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a condition of development approval. The estimated number of students generated from the development approvals from new residential dwelling units will be used in the data and analysis to support the annual update of the School ReaFd'sDistrict's Five -Year Capital Improv m .nt Plan, Five yeaF Appendix "D" provides a suaaested calendar of events for the Parties to this Agreement Section 66. School Site Selection and School Remodeling Review 6.1 School Site Selection and School Remodeling. The School District 13easd swill shall submit to the a# festedapplicable Local Government ReRreview iP@- the potential sites for new schools proposals for FeRevatieR Words underlined are added; words soh are deleted Words dodo ubined are added; words 4e041e-�e deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) expaRSier nd closure.- of existing schools; 10 01 .. .. Lei applicable, vii= schoole 6,2Site Selection Review. The following matters will be considered by the applicable Local Government informal site evalwatieR GOFAMitteG, the COUR hen evaluating potential school sites, expansions, construction that changes the primary use of M (a) The location of school sites that will provide logical focal points for community activities such as the @@RqRqwRili pubk facilities itemized in Subsection 810.1 and serve as the cornerstone for innovative urban design standards, including opportunities for shared use and co- location of community facilities. (b) The location of new elementary and middle schools proximate to residential neighborhoods. Words underlined are added; words soh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words mare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (c) The location of new schools within reasonable walking distance of the residential dwelling units served by the schools, as practicable, under the student assignment program. (d) The location of new high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with access to major roads. (e) Compatibility of the school site with present and projected uses of adjacent property. (f) Encouragement of community redevelopment and revitalization and efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl. (g) Land availability, site acquisition and development costs, and degree of urbanization. (h) Safe access to and from the school site by pedestrians and vehicles. (i) Availability of public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed school, concurrent with the impacts of the school. Q) Environmental constraints that could preclude development of a public school on the site if mitigation is not available or practicable. (k) Impact on archaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by the Local Government Gounty-as a locally significant historic or archaeological resource. (1) Soil characteristics that indicate the proposed site is suitable for development or is adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with the provision of drainage improvements. (m) The proposed location in relation to the Local Government's 6edat} stormwater management plans or watershed management plans. (n) The proposed location in relation to the velocity -flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the Local Government's Comprehensive Plan. (o) The ability of the site to accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles. (p) The proposed location in relation to any airports considering the requirements of Section 333.03, €lerida &atutesF_S, which regulates the construction of public educational facilities in the viii: nity of an airport. 636.3 Timing. As early as PFast1saWe120 days, but no less than 60 days prior to asp- date- wiut- R,aoa�- Words underlined are added; words &uueb-F H> O are deleted Words double underlined are added; words denbia mM @11 f1wengh .are deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility, expansions. construction that changes the primary use of a facility. percent increase In student CapaCIIV OF IRINONR@ iR6 OF of an existing school, the School Beafd- District shall provide written notice of same to the applicable Local GovernmentGounty. The 6e(ftyLocal Government, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the School DistrictgeaFd within 45 days if the proposed new school site or @I &R eiiiMiRg s@hool is consistent ASS a7r_nr_:r. ! This preliminary notice does not constitute the- Gounloa determination of consistency by the Local Government pursuant to Section 1013.33(120, €19tida MaiatesF.S.. Section 76. Supporting Infrastructure Words underlined are added; words s"elk Owengh are deleted Words do Eby =�,dPrli�ed are added; words �glfare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6107 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) for the maintenance or improvement of the property of any educational plant or of any facility on such property. Expenditures may also be made for sanitary sewer, water, stormwater, and utility improvements upon or continuous to any existing or proposed educational plant. 7.3 In accordance with 1013.51 (1)(b) The School District may pay its groportionate Section 7-8. Local Planning Agency Review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Re zonings, and Developments of Regional Impact Which Increase Residential Density.Apprevals a.8.1 School District Representation on the Local Planning Aaencv. As provided by Section 163.3174, F S as may be amended from time to time tT-he Geunty Local Governments will include a nonvoting representative appointed by the School Board on the local planning agency, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agency considers comprehensive plan amendments and-rezonings and Develooments of Regional Impact (DRII that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The Seaaty -Local Governments may, at4ts in their discretion, grant voting status to the School 13eaFd District representative. The School BeaFd District will receive local planning agency's agendas and appropriate backup materials from the Local Governments Gew4 -and will review and comment as appropriate. ivotnication of Potential Enrollment Impacts The Local Governments County will provide the School DistrictReard notification of all land use applisat;D%Qomprehensive Plan Amendments rezonings and DRIB and development PF9pG6a!s pending before -it -that may affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. Such notice will be provided at least 4-4 20 days prior to approval of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the Comprehensive PlanGravAh MaRagement Plan, �,,�t a„d 8.3 School 8eardDistrict Response. After notification by the Geu*Local Government, RF461 POOF tO OPRIFOONG14 OPPFE11081, the School 2istrictl3eard wi4shall advise the County Local Government, at least 10 days prior to appli .atio approval. of the school enrollment impacts anticipated to result from the proposed land use appliGatiGn Comprehensive Plan Amendment rezoning or DRI-er and whether sufficient capacity exists or is planned in order to accommodate the impacts. 8.4 Insufficient Capacity. Based on th adopted Words underli ed me added; words seuali Oneugq are deleted Words double d l n are added; words 9eYbleeax A limagh are deleted -both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 00 /l8/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) level of service standard for schools, if sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School District@eard shall specify the anticipated student enrollment deficiency. fees, If sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at The review by the School District staff regarding comprehensive plan sufficient capacity. 8.5 Review Criteria. In reviewing and approving land use applications, rezoning requests and development DRIs. the 6eupty -Local Governments will consider, if applicable, the following issues; . (a) Providing school sites and facilities within planned neighborhoods. (b) Insuring the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. (c) The co- location of parks, recreation and community facilities with school sites. (d) The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. (e) Insuring the development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and the surrounding neighborhood. (f) Providing off -site signalization, signage, access, other transportation improvements and sidewalks to serve aA schools. (g) The inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new developments. (h) Encouraging the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. (i) School DistrictReafd comments on GFGMh Manageme omprehensive Plan amendments, rezoninas and DRIs is GallieFc Words underlined are added; words s"ek dffeugh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words 9e41e stio -sh Mm ogh w— deleted -both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Q) Available school capacity, planned improvements or mitigation for insufficient plaRned t9 OROFea6e 6G capacity. 48.6 Community Development. In formulating community development plans and programs, the SeunWLocal Governments will consider the following issues: 1-(al Target community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. 24b) Coordinate County- programs and capital improvements that are consistent with and meet the capital needs identified in the School District's Scheel Beards school facilities plan. &(c) Encourage developments and property owners to donate school sites at predevelopment prices, assist with the construction of new facilities or renovateieR t® existing facilities, and provide transportation alternatives. 4.(d) Address and resolve multi - jurisdictional public school issues. Section 89. Educational Plant Survey 84Educational Plant Survey. At least one year prior to preparation of the educational plant survey update, the slat# werklag— greepSWG established in Subsection 23_.1 of this Agreement will assist the School Beard District in the preparation of this update pursuant to Section 1013.33 (3)(f) F S . The staff- wedding greupSWG will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new educational facilities, or improvements to existing educational facilities in terms of consistency with the applicable Local Governments' County Comprehensive PlanGFeMh ManaElement Plan. and Section 810. Co- location and Shared Use 10.1 Co- location and Shared Use. Co- location and shared use of facilities are important to both the Scheel - ReaFdSchool District and the Local GovernmentsSeaaty. a. The School Qistrict.Beard in coordination with Local Governments, will look for opportunities to co- locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when Words underlined are added; words straw- Ebrsugh are deleted Words double underlined me added; words AeukleannelFilff stgh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 0 0 /] 9/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) preparing the its — Educational Plant Survey and annual Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. Likewise, co- location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the Gaunty –Local Governments, in coordination with the School District, when preparing the updates to 4s-their GrqyAh MaRagerneRtComprehensive Plan, Schedule of Capital Improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, sity upU<?li facilities. 4" rL A separate agreement between the Scheel BeardSchool District and the Geu*Local Government or other appropriate entity, will be developed for each instance of co- location and shared use which addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision. Section 4911. Citizen Advisory 8versijM -Group 11.2 Membership, The School Board, aad --the County Commission and each City Council shall ea9h appoint a no more than two (21 citizen members to serve on the CAG. The citizen members shall have knowledge or Words underlined are added; words ewaek dxaugh are deleted Words double a derlived are added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10118107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) a year to the County Commission he Citv Council Band -the SchoolrBoard and the general public on the implementation of this Agreement tegetheFandwitl4 its the effectiveness of school concurrence. conducted in accordance with Florida's Government -in- the - Sunshine law including: (a) Meetings must be open to the public: (b) Reasonable notice of the meetings must be given and (c) Minutes of the meeting must be taken Section 11-2. Site Plan Review for Schools 12.3 review and comment on athe proposed site plan a. Existing Interlocal Agreement between the County and the School District. Words underlined are added; words ssaek4hreugb are deleted Words double underlined are added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) The School District and the County recognize the existence of, and shall remain subject to, the Interlocal Agreement between the County and The School District, dated May 27, 2003, entitled INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO ESTABLISH EDUCATIONAL PLANT AND ANCILLARY PLANT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESSES AND SUBSTANTIVE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, commonly referred to as the "SBR" review process, as it may be amended from time to time. The School District and the County currently intend that this Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms. b. Expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement Between the County and the School District. The County and the School District agree that prior to the expiration of the SBR Interlocal Agreement, aReih@F A@Fasm@M ohall they will negotiate in Section 13. Requirements for the School Concurrence Program Words underlined are added; words struele thfough are deleted Words double underlined are added; words d� deleted —both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) issued only if school capacity within a CSA is available in public school school capacity is available to serve the residential development at the the criteria established in the applicable Local Government's Public School Facilities Element (PSFE). nerepy agree tnat the adopted LUS standard shall be 100% of Permanent FISH (a) The School District may use a Tiered LOS standard or a long term planning Period. During the time that the Tiered LOS or the Iona term (a) J- M - u -. e4irsuayne -. . E Lai I 1I. I I Lei 1. I Eel 91OPME.Mal I I G.. -�.. 1 :. u — - Words underlined are added; words stmek dwaugb are deleted Words dQuble double mdr 1 uW are added; words dexbleelnek Onsoglt -are deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9 /6/07 (10 /18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (b) The County and Cities shall adopt the standards for modification of the CSA boundary maps as defined here into the PSFE of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 Specialized schools shall not be included in the CSA's identified above ape groups or grade levels. 1. The adopted LOS standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five -year planning period: and 2. The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the greatest extent possible taking into account transportation costs, court approved desegregation plans and other relevant factors. (d) The Parties shall observe the following process for modifying CSA boundary maps: 1. The School District, in coordination with Local Governments shall review the proposed CSA boundaries and the data and analysis used to proposed changes within forty -five (45) days of receipt. Words underlined are added; words eeaek- dxexgh are deleted Words double md rlin A are added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/19/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 13.4 Specific Responsibilities of the School District By entering into this Statutes: adopted level of service standard for the school type consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. (c) Construct the capacity enhancing and modernization projects which, when migation to provide a unitorm system of free public schools on a county -wide basis. the aeveiopment of new residential dwelling units (e) Provide the Local Governments with the required data and analysis updated annually to support the comprehensive plan elements and any amendments relatina to school concurrencv (g) Review proposed new residential developments for compliance with concurrencv standards, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement (i) Prepare annual reports on enrollment and capacity, consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. Words underlined are added; words 4kaek4ko h are deleted Words double , underlined are added; words dent Im shmek d" aogi are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (k) Provide information to the Local Governments regarding enrollment Local Governments' comprehensive plans, consistent with the reauirements of this Agreement. identify school capacity projects necessary to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standard for CSAs of each school type and to verify its ability to fund the capital improvement projects for the five year planning period, as amended annually. Ow (b) Timing. The School District shall update and adopt the Five -Year Capital shall: 1. Specify all new construction remodeling or renovation projects which will add permanent capacity or modernize existing facilities. 2. Include a description of each school project, a listing of funds to be Governments, shall annually update the Concurrence Service Area School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. (c) Transmittal. The School District shall transmit to the Local Governments and the SWG copies of the proposed annually updated and financially Words underlined are added; words se ek- dxeugh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words , mm A, flimugltare deleted —both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/ 18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) ims Hareemem. (d) Adoption. Unless the adoption is delayed by mediation or a lawful challenge, the School Board shall adopt the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan no later than September 30th and it shall become effective no later than October 1st of each year (e) Amendment. The School Board shall not amend the Five -Year Capital District, with the concurrence of a maiority vote by its Board members provides written confirmation that: 1. The modification, delay or deletion of a project is required in order to meet the School District's constitutional obligation to provide a 2. The modification delay or deletion of a project is occasioned by unanticipated change in population projections or growth patterns or is required in order to provide needed capacity in a location that has a Trom wmcn me originally planned project is modified delayed or deleted: and The School Board, in coordination with local Governmnl& may amend the Words underlined are added; words Na through are deleted Words double under] ned are added; words 9eablee are deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) year planning period. approved consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. M Share information with the School District reaardina population proiections. (d) Maintain data for residential development which shall be provided to the School District annually in accordance with Section 5.2 of this Aareement. 13.8 Required Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The County and the Cities 163.3180, F.S. Words underlined are added; words s0 ek L%Fongk we deleted Words double underlined are added; words dexble @b sk dwsugh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) acnool ulstricrs rive -Year Gagital Improvement Plan concerning costs Improvement Plan. Words underlined are added; words stritek dueugh arc deleted Words double under I aW are added; words dexbk�exek theengMate deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) effective. for review and comment. a. To achieve required consistency, all Local Governments shall adopt the amendment in accordance with the statutory procedures for amending comprehensive plans. b If any Local Government objects to the amendment and the Any local issues not specifically required by law in the PSFE may be for School District. shall be in accordance with that process set forth in Section 163.3184. F.S. provisions into its land development regulations (LDR) consistent with the requirements of this Agreement. (a) The County and the Cities shall amend their LDRs to implement school concurrence provisions for the review of plats. site plans or the functional equivalent, which increase residential density. 2. At any time. any Local Government may opt out of the County's Words underlined are added; words sbuek- dxeugq are deleted Words double underlined are added; words mare deleted —both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) shall commence on or before March 1. 2008 Section 14. Uniform School Concurrence Process achieved and maintained. (a) No plat, site plan or the functional equivalent for new residential development may be approved by the County or Cities unless the (b) A Local Government may condition the approval of the application to to its home rule regulatory powers. 1. All single family lots of record at the time the School Concurrence implementing ordinance becomes effective Im be subiect to a restrictive covenant limitina the age of residents to 18 years and older. impact fees. Words underlined are added; words suuc#threagb are deleted Words do �6y 1 d rg lamed are added; words 9euble St Oli k4sagh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) as to whether or not a development, lot or unit is exempt from the requirements of school concurrence. component that is not exempt under Section 14.1(c) of this Agreement is subject to school concurrence and must prepare and submit a School Impact Analysis (SIA) to the Local Government, for review by the School District. (a) The SIA must indicate the location of the development, number of dwelling units and unit types (single - family, multi - family, 0004weeais. etc.), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age- restrictions for occupancy (if any). The review. A flow chart outlining the school concurrence review process is included as Appendix "C ". The process is as follows: Local Government transmits the SIA to the School District for review. The School District may charge the Applicant a non - refundable application fee payable to the School District to meet the cost of review. 2. The School District representative shall review the Applicant's SIA for a 3. The School District representative shall verify whether or n.ot sufficient student stations for each school type are available. +la in the CSA in which The proposed developments G&A is located, to support the Applicant's proposed development. a. To determine a proposed development's projected students, the projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific CSA using the SGMA, as established in Section 4.4 of this Agreement b. New school capacity within a CSA which is in place or under Words underlined are added; words stmek tireugk art deleted Words double underlined are added; words 9exble.eMx ` dwh xgh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) development under review. exceeded in the CSA, an adjacent CSA will be reviewed for available capacity. shall issue a SCADL indicating that capacity is available any school type and there is available capacity in an adjacent CSA, the actual development impacts shall be shifted to an adjacent CSA having available capacity. This shift may be tvoe(s) impacted. 5. In the event that there is not adequate capacity available within the affected Local Government and the Applicant pursuant to Section 14.5 of this Agreement. 7. The Local Government shall be responsible for notifying the School Words underlined are added; words s�ek throug are deleted Words double d 1linen are added; words deab6s� are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 14.3 School Concurrence Approval. Issuance of a SCADL by the School District (a) A Local Government shall not issue a COA for a residential development concurrence for the residential development shall be valid for the life of the COA. Expiration, extension or modification of a COA for a residential (b) Local Governments shall notify the School District within ten (10) working days of any official change in the validity (status) of a COA for a residential development. (c) The Local Government shall not issue a building permit or its functional equivalent, for a non - exempt residential development without confirming development shall be valid for the life of the COA. adopted level of service standard within the CSA for each school type,. Jhe (a) Student enrollment projections shall be based on the most recently adopted School District CIP, and the DRT shall be updated to reflect these projections. Available capacity shall be derived using the following formula: Available Capacity = CSA Capacity' — (Enrollmenf + Vested3) Where ' CSA Capacity = Permanent FISH Capacity of all schools within the applicable CSA for each school type (as programmed in the first three (3) Words underlined are added; wards skaekthreugh are deleted Words double mderlined are added; words 9eobiore� a deleted - bodi since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 14.5 Proportionate Share Mitigation. In the event there is not sufficient school development through the creation of additional school capacity. established LOS standard for the affected school type(s). The amount to Florida. plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites. (b) The methodology used to calculate an Applicant's proportionate share mitiaation shall be as follows: Proportionate Share = ('Development students - Available Capacity) x Total Costa per student station Where the following definitions apply: 'Development students = Students generated by residential development that are assigned to that CSA for the affected school tvge(s) determined and published annually in the School District's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. (c) The applicant may be allowed to enter a negotiation period with the School Words underlined are added; words are deleted Words double und rlui d are added; words dewWe�are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) with iurisdiction over the approval of the development order. toward a school capacity project for the impacted school type(s), and identified in the School District's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Capacity projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five accordance with the formula provided in Section 14.5(b) of this Agreement. 3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, the School District may add a capacity project to the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan to satisfy the impacts from a proposed a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition in coniunction with the provision of additional school capacity: or c. Provision of additional student stations through the donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative learning facility: or d. Provision of additional student stations through the renovation of existing buildings for use as learning facilities: or e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations or core capacity: or f. Construction of a public school facility in advance of the time set forth in the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. mitioatina capacity will reflect the estimated future construction costs at the time of the anticipated construction. Words underlined are added; words skaek Offeug h we deleted Words double underlined are added; words AeebleaNxek- thpa-A are deleted -both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6107 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) improvements on which the proportionate share mitigation is calculated 6. If the proportionate share mitigation required is greater than the imoact responsibility of the Applicant. 7 Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School B. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period a second SCADL shall be any mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is not 14.6 Appeal Process A person may appeal a determination made as a part of the school concurrence process. F.S. (b) A person substantially affected by a Local Government decision made as a development orders. This shall not apply to any decision subject to section a above. Section 15. Special Provisions 15.1 School District Requirements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Words underlined are added; words St elk th wgh are deleted Words double e,der] n l we added; words deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Section 4216. Resolution of Disputes If the Parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any issue relative to this Agreement and within which they may be in disagreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, €lel:ida- Statate6F_S., or any other acceptable means of alternative dispute resolution agreed to by the Parties to this Aareement. Section 4517. Amendment of the Agreement statutory provisions. Section 4418. Execution of the Agreement This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument and be the Agreement between the parties. Section 4619. K*P*atiewTermination of the Agreement. No party to this Agreement may terminate its participation in the agreement, except: Words underlined are added; words s9aeh- tlxaugh are deleted Words double underlined are added; words AeubleebuelrNsreugh are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (b) Upon receipt of a waiver from the Department of Community Affairs per Section 163.31777(1)(c). F.S.: or this Agreement. Section 20. Entire Agreement. Section 21. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be March 1 2008 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Agreement has been executed by the Parties by their duly authorized officials on the date set forth below. Words underlined are added; words s;tagh are deleted Words double under! ned are added; words d@uWo leih�eegh-are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, FLORIDA DWIGHT BROCK, CLERK By: By: Attest as to Chairman's JAMES COLETTA. CHAIRMAN signature only. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel, County Attorney ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD Date: Date: Words underlined are added; words s�ek dffeuo are deleted Words double le nderlig are added; words deoblee�re deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added; words ugh are deleted Words d h ,�d are added; words Aexblw*%%*k-Nwexgh - are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY, FLORIDA Duly Passed and Adooted by the City Council of Everglades City, Florida. this Day of ,200 . Words underlined are added; words suuek nif augh are deleted Words double underline— added; words denbleaatek - are deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6107 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARCO ISLAND FLORIDA THIS Day of 200 CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA Signed: Attest (Seal) By: Clerk Duly Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Marco Island Florida this Dav of .200 . Words underlined are added; words swuek tlimugH are deleted Words do ubl� e named are added; words AeAM&@WaolNMrengRare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916107 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, THIS Day of .200---. CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA Signed: Attest (Seal) Duly Passed and Adopted by the City Council of Naples, Florida, this Day of ,200 Words underlined are added; words s"ek dweugM are deleted Words double a derlined are added; words 9e46le�e deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX "A" Concurrence Service Area Mao Series 10- 18- 07_undedine_[LA _FINAL_all stnkethcoughs_ additions_ to date with maps.doc APPENDIX "B" School District Student Generation Multiplier Data: L,ounty ua aeoanment. Student Data - The student population poll used in this study is from October 2006 Amona the ine oasis Tor aeterminina housing type in this study Methodoloay: uraue ranee ana nousma ivoe. allumm to oHSei occasional nousma tvoe assignment errors Words underlined are added, are deleted Words double mde lined are added word deleted both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/19/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) The housina cateaory data is present in the CCPA parcel database in the form of the DOR Government. number of address points that fall upon each parcel This was accomplished by way of a spatial Analysis and Results: • Elementary: Pre - Kindergarten — Fifth • Middle: Sixth — Eighth • Hiah: Ninth —Twelfth The housing type was obtained from the DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database. and Words underlined are added words &awk4hrouth are deleted Words double underlined are added w0als arc deleted - both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Table 1: DOR Code, Student Count. and Housing Type Breakdown D R Use Code U ode scrl Lion "sin i ti I nunH ri �; 1 . <fi( i 1 3 Single Famil Residential Multi -Family 10 units or more 14.111 le Famil Multi -Famil Retirement H mes 18 Multi -Family 7 8 51 Multi -Famil le than 10 unit A ricultural 329 79 Multi -F mil Sin le Family 52 A ricultural 18 Sin le Family 60 A ricultural 27 Sin le Family 66 A ricultural 38 Sin le Family 67 A ricultural 39 Sin le Family 69 A ricultural 55 Sin le Family 71 Institutional 3 Multi-Family 75 Institutional 230 Multi -Fa mil 79 Institutional 29 Multi-Family 83 Government 19 Government 86 Gov rnment 105 Government 87 Government 46 Government 88 Government 733 Government 90 Government 97 Government i A <i ;. td five 99 Non/A ricultural Acrea a 123 Sin le Famil Words underlined are added words err, are deleted Words double underlined are added, words - - - - - - —ac dejrted both since disuibution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing? type. Table 2: Students by Housing Type and School Type Table 3: Dwelling Units by Type Sin le Famfiv in le Familv Multi-Familv Condo /Co- Op Mobile Homes Government Elementa 11,919 3 �704 1 �678 1,190 492 Middle 7 �063 1 �462 867 435 207 HI h .12 8.942 1 574 1 191 76 302 mat Table 3: Dwelling Units by Type Sin le Famfiv Multi-Fami/v Con o- 0 Mobile Homes �Government 73 517 118,183 [M �757 11 �01 55 11 715 Table 4: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates Discussion: WQrds underlined are added- words sauek4w¢h are deleted Words double mdubned are added words �eMare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Sin gle Family Multi-Famil Mobile Homes Condo lCo- O Govemmeni Elementa 0.16 0.20 0! 051 0.12 0.29 Middle .10 0.08 5 0.04 0.12 .12 0.09 .01 0.05 Discussion: WQrds underlined are added- words sauek4w¢h are deleted Words double mdubned are added words �eMare deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added words sftmek-&e h are deleted Words double underlined are added, words AgabIg stoma'= thwwwl.uo deleted both sine distribution to the CCPC on 916107 (10 /18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX "C" School Concurrence Process Flow Chart Words and 1m ed are added words &twk-Hxeneh are deleted Words double underlined am added words d!!� re deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 916/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transnuttal Hearing) Applicant receives when notice specifying deficlencles APpiiceni Mhdrays aWl,callon School astrict issues School Cmm1v Avallalb Local Govenaned issues Certificale of Public Facility School CaPecly AvaNeWly Ddwn)hatbn Letter veld for the Ile d the Certbkale Applicant, Local Scholl District issues School tion Ley Avdenli yi Dderninalbn Letter identifying deficiarry in capmily Mitigation option e*ded School Dmtnct issues e School Cmrcurrbrry Deficiency Leder Local Government dertes application NO CAPACBy AVAILABLE Applicant aubmts ndlce of appeal With Local Govermert or Sc hod Board, as eppleade Appeal reywAed ant scheduled for hearing by the Dowd or Nally Olflper Appeal to CMCU1 Cout The Band or Words underlined are added wIld, 2hpiCkIffiEftith are deleted Words double underlined are added- words ANil' Ix.a' mm" d sug' are deleted - both since distnbu bn to the CCPC on 916107 f IO/I8/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing APPENDIX "D" Suggested Calendar of Events comment. trends. September 30 School District shall update and adopt the financially feasible Five -Year Capital Iml2rovement Plan effective mn October 1. Words mderlined are added words s4uek d>r r are deleted Words double underlined are added words AexW"W MUN wmb!= deleted — both since distribution to the CCPC on 9/6/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added words ph am deleted Words double underlined are added ords ' — "- -•– abry a deleted both since disnib [ion to the CPC n 9/6/07 LLOl18 /07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT &A W14: pool uwsxF .,.:s - Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline are added; words in red and straektMedgh are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double nndedinad are added; words dedHls- etwelatkreagh are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words tfo hl in blue are added; words Wawkila sllFwQl through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words 9awly'@ Mwelf livewo are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words double underlined in blue are added; words 9eukle- sliwsle through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) GOAL. OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT CAPITAL PLAN. CSAs. Policy 1.1.2: Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted undgrling are added; words in red and s#uak Nueugkr-are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words dea4ls- etraelFSxeugN are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words dnnhle underlined in blue are added; words 9suHle -ekaek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) vimin. yer[ry utat as a resua oT Tne Cnange: A. The adopted LOS standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five -year planning period: and B. The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the areatest extent Av The School District, in coordination with klocal 6aovernments shall review the 7 C. boundary map by the School Board. New maps of the CSA boundaries shall also be included as data and analysis in support of the 6local 6aovernmente= G16s SFEs• Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted.. d....... are added; words in red and strask- threug{�are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words deuVk ctrdskt#reugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words double undedined in blue are added; words 9eukle -skyek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) A. At such time as the School District determines that a change in the school facility _ -.. - • - . ..I r .1111 -I Policy 1.2.2: The County shall cr: school concurrencv: A. B. Anv new to as of the e@wA4aoseP4e44 effective date of the School Concurrence Program in Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline are added; words in red and 6#UG'OhMugh are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 -•- Words double Lind rlin d are added; words dawkila sopwok thFnwqA are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words dnnhle underlined in blue are added; words AeuUle- etrdek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 10 Q E. protects mat are not exempt under Policy 1.2.2. of thi I _m nt The minimum process requirements are diariak ied hglew as follow : 0 A C. ., ---- �.r 1. 2. If capacity is not available within the affected CSA contiguous CSAs are reviewed for available capacity. Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with cloned ugderline are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double are added; words AeaHk -skder thmuyH are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words doaihle ended ned in blue are added; words GlQ,hlea4rwk through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 3. 4. A. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to: 1. Contribution of land or Payment for land acquisition in conjunction with the provision of additional school capacity: or 2. 3. Donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative learning facility: or 4. Renovation of existing buildinas for use as learning facilities: or 5. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations or core caDacity: or M B. If mitigation is approved the County and the School District shall enter into an I" Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline are added; words in red and strusktpreugh re deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words ElOWM@ 611MOk thFQw@h are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words double underlined in blue are added; words 9eeUls- straek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9116/07 (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) A. A District. D. The County shall not issue a building permit or its functional equivalent for a non exempt residential development without confirming that the development received a COA at plat, site plan or functional equivalent and the COA is still valid. emergency prepareaness Issues. Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with d__o_tte_d underline are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words 9edbla- ekdek{prewgp are deleted, as proposed by County staff Wards double underlined in blue are added; words Aea4laefrdek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) ea�eii�on a case.by,case,basis,. Policy 1.3.2: commencement. parties responsible for the planning constructing operating and maintaining infrastructure for these facilities is identified A separate agreement between the School District and the Words undedined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dglted, underline are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words NIBLAIm allFwair Owsw9h are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words donhle underlined in blue are added; words dedNle- strdek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) County or other avorovriate entity, will be developed for each instance of co location and shared use which addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs scheduling of use, and facility supervision. FA B. The design and use of public schools as emergency shelters C. Puiiirnary .. . or-- �apl ;ai__ improvements., Nrogram °and"Summary_ of., Estimated,,, Revenue" Tables ;, These -- tables__ identify. the financially feasible school facility capacity - protects necessary to. address ,- existing,_deficiencies_. and future needs_ - based.. upon achieving__a.nA maintaining_, the.- adopted, LOS__, standard___ for schools,_ -_ love Year ^ ^�^ +• • ^ j 'rxl Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with d_o_tt__.d___un__d__erl[n__e are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words 9eWle- ekaak- *Feuyp are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words double under] n d in blue are added; words double -eMeek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10(18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Policy 1.4.1: Revenue" Tables. as.formally_adopted_by„ the_School_Board,.as „part_of . the_CIE,._ Policy 1.4.2: A. A map or maps which identify the location of existina public school facilities by Woe, and the location of ancillary plants. Q Policy 1.4.3: M- 5.025(3)(c)(6) F.A.C.1 Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted undgrline are added; words in red and mare deleted, as proposed by District staff/consultant- 0_ distribution to the CCPC on 9116107 Words double underlined are added; words d@Wl9l@ PINSk N4F8wqh are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words donnle underlined in blue are added; words Wa-kl'a RtFwQk through in bfue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (1011 8/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) APPENDIX A MAP SERIES ,. .. Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with d_o_tt__e_d___u_n__d_e_ r_li_n__e_ are added; words in red and struek- fhreugH -are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double unclad ned are added; words dawhim -etMOk #4F@w@lq are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words double underlined in blue are added; words 9suble stwek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with d4([ed underline are added; words in red and stwsk4Meugh -are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double nnde_rlined are added; words &WIlliml VIFUSk ihFQwglq are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words dolihip. jindprlinpd in blue are added; words lAwhlQ g4wQ1, through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 13 Words underlined are added, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline are added; words in red and struekNtreugh -are deleted, as proposed by District staff /consultant — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words +are deleted, as proposed by County staff Words do ihle underlined in blue are added; words Fleu4laskuek through in blue are deleted, as proposed by County staff - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10118107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) .a PUBLIC SCHOOL `► FACILITIES ELEMENT: Data & Analysis AUGUST 2007 r >4v iP M„ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................ ............................... 1 PURPOSEOF REPORT ............................................................................ ..............................1 COUNTY INFORMATION (POPULATION / TRENDS) ......................... ............................... 3 POPULATION PROJECTIONS .................................................................. ..............................3 HOUSING............................................................................................. ..............................4 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - GROWTH AREAS ................................... ..............................4 EXISTING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS ........................ ............................... 9 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT, FACILITY CAPACITY, AND EXISTING UTILIZATION .........................9 EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITES .......................................................... ............................... 10 STUDENT GENERATION RATES ......................................................... ............................... 15 PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS .................... ............................... 21 PROJECTEDENROLLMENT ................................................................. ............................... 21 PROJECTEDCAPACITY ...................................................................... ............................... 26 m 10 AND 20 YEAR FORECAST ............................................................ ............................... 29 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ..................................................... ............................... 32 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS FOR COLLIER COUNTY ...... ............................... 32 LEVELOF SERVICE ....................................................................................... ............................... 39 SCHOOL LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR COLLIER COUNTY ........................ ............................... 39 CO- LOCATION AND JOINT -USE ANALYSIS ............................... ............................... 42 MUTUALUSE AGREEMENTS .............................................................. ............................... 43 SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND REVENUE SOURCES .............................. 45 SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ................................... ............................... 45 SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE SOURCES ............................................... .............................50 SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND SCHOOL PLANNING SHARED COSTS ........ 52 SCHOOL DISTRICTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY .................. ............................... 53 APPENDICIES................................................................. ............................... 54 STUDENT GENERATION RATES - APPENDIX 1 .................................. ............................... 55 IMPACT FEE STUDY STUDENT GENERATION RATES - APPENDIX 2 ... ............................... 56 CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA (CSA) CREATION METHODOLOGY- APPENDIX 3 ............. 58 n ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY MAPS- APPENDIX 4 ................................... ............................... 63 Collier County Public School Facilities Element ii Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: POPULATION TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ........................ 3 TABLE 2: PERCENTAGE GROWTH OF POPULATION TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ................................................. ............................... 3 TABLE 3: HOUSING TRENDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES ........................... 4 TABLE 4: PERCENTAGE GROWTH OF HOUSING TRENDS ................. ............................... 4 TABLE 5: PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENT .................................. ............................... 9 TABLE 6: COMPARISON OF POPULATION GROWTH AND NEW HOUSING TO HIGH SCHOOL PLANNING AREA ENROLLMENT IN 2006 ................... ............................... 10 TABLE 7: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL TYPE .......................... 10 TABLE 8: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL .. ............................... 12 TABLE 9: COMPARISON OF CAPACITY TO ENROLLMENT BY SPECIAL SCHOOL TYPE ................ 14 TABLE 10: DOR CODE, STUDENT COUNT, AND HOUSING TYPE BREAKDOWN ..................... 18 TABLE 11: STUDENTS BY HOUSING TYPE AND SCHOOL TYPE ........ ............................... 19 TABLE 12: DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE ................................... ............................... 19 TABLE 13: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY STUDENT GENERATION RATES ........... 19 TABLE 14: DOE COFTE FORECAST ...................................... ............................... 23 TABLE 15: PROPOSED NEW SCHOOLS AND ADDITIONS THROUGH 2011 -12 ..................... 27 TABLE 16: 10 -YEAR SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT FORECAST .... ............................... 30 TABLE 17:10 -YEAR RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY BY COUNTY PLANNING AREA ............................................... ............................... 30 TABLE 18: 20 -YEAR SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT FORECAST .... ............................... 30 TABLE 19: 20 -YEAR RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY BY COUNTY PLANNINGAREA ............................................... ............................... 31 TABLE 20: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN .................. ............................... 34 TABLE 21: MIDDLE SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN ........................ ............................... 35 TABLE 22: HIGH SCHOOL CSA BREAKDOWN ........................... ............................... 35 TABLE 23: LEVEL OF SERVICE BY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA ......................... 41 TABLE 24: SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, FY 2007/08 - 2011/12 .................... 46 TABLE 25: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE, FY 2007/08 — 2011/12 ........................ 51 Collier County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TRENDS: 2001 AND 2006 .. ............................... 6 FIGURE 1A: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TRENDS RELATIVE TO STUDENT LOCATION: 2001 AND 2006 ............................................................................................. ............................... 7 FIGURE 2: APPROVED AND POTENTIAL NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ........................... 8 FIGURE 3: EXISTING SCHOOL AND ANCILARY FACILITIES MAP ....... ............................... 13 FIGURE 4: PROJECTED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011 -2012 ............. 25 FIGURE 5: PROJECTED MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011 -2012 ................... 25 FIGURE 6: PROJECTED HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT THROUGH 2011 -2012 ...................... 25 FIGURE 7: FUTURE SCHOOLS AND ANCILARY FACILITIES MAP ........ ............................... 28 FIGURE 8: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS .. ............................... 36 FIGURE 9: MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ........ ............................... 37 FIGURE 10: HIGH SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS ......... ............................... 38 FIGURE 11: PUBLIC FACILITIES WITH SCHOOL CO-LOCATION OPPORTUNITIES MAP ............ 44 Collier County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis iv Draft Document - August 2007 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1: ........ DRAFT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING ATTACHMENT 2: ............................................................. EDUCATIONAL PLANT SURVEY ATTACHMENT 3:.... DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ATTACHMENT 4:........... SCHOOL IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL REPORT — COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Collier County Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 VGRZT-TIMP . 1 Public schools are essential components to the well -being and future of a community. Residential development occurring within the community is the primary factor associated with student population growth within a public school system. Because of the relationship between residential development and the provision of public schools, coordination among the District School Board of Collier County (School District), Collier County, and the Municipalities of Collier County is critical to ensure that public school capacity needs for future student growth can be met within the public school system. Recognizing the importance of public schools, the 2005 Florida Legislature enacted legislation amending Sections 163.3180 and 163.3177, Florida Statutes (F.S.), mandating the implementation of public school concurrency supported by data and analysis. This Data and Analysis Report has been created in accordance with the requirements of 163.3177(12) (c), F.S. and 93- 5.025(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), to detail the methods and analyze the results of the study that have been employed to support the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) for the School Concurrency Program. The School District, along with Collier County and the municipalities of Everglades City, Marco Island, and Naples are working together, participating in school concurrency. Purpose of Report The Data and Analysis for the PSFE addresses land development, economic, and demographic issues which impact education. These issues include: County growth and population trends; school level of service; school utilization; school proximity and compatibility with residential development; availability of public infrastructure; co- location opportunities for school and public infrastructure; and financial feasibility. Each affected local government must adopt a consistent Public School Facilities Element. This Report will provide Collier County, Everglades City, Marco Island, and Naples with the required data and analysis necessary to adopt a public school concurrency program consistent with the amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning (Attachment A), Subsection 91- 5.025(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and Chapter 163, F.S. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 1 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 The data and analysis provided for the PSFE establishes the coordination between the school board, local governments, and county necessary for planning and permitting residential development to ensure that school capacity is available at the adopted level of service for schools prior to or concurrent with the student impact from residential development. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 2 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Population Using the Collier County 2006 Population Estimates and Projection methodology, population data were collected for the City of Naples, City of Marco Island and Everglades City, in addition to the unincorporated areas of Collier County. Data sources include the 1990 US Census, and the populations and projections compiled by Collier County for the years 2000- 2025. The population figures and projections from Collier County are those from the 2006 October count, and are based on the County's methodology for projecting population, as of October 2006. In the future, population projection figures from Collier County will continue to be supplied to the School District, using whichever methodology the County is using at that time. These data are shown below in Table 1. From 1990 to 2000, the Collier County population increased by 59 percent, and increased 21 percent from 2000 -2005. Projections indicate a 23 percent increase from 2005 to 2010, a 17 percent increase from 2010 to 2015, an increase of 15 percent from 2015 to 2020, and an increase of 13 percent from 2020 to 2025, displayed in Table 2 below. Based on the figures provided, the overall population of the County is expected to increase by over 350,000 persons between 2005 and 2025. Table 1: Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities 2000-20Z5-Data obtained from Copier County Comprehensive Planning Department (DRober data, 2006 Population Estimates and Projections) Table 2: Percentage Growth of Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities 1990 _ 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Unincorporated Collier . Coon 122,500 221,139 287,511 382,122 464,770 549,892 636,431 City ofNaples 19,505 21,332 22,779 24,470 25,742 26,760 27,345 City of M6rcibl'Istand 9,773 14,973 15,737 16,641 17,590 18,592 19,652 Eve lades Cl 321 484 578 912 947 983 7021 Countywide Total . 152,099 257,926 326,605 424,145 509,049 596,227 1684,449 2000-20Z5-Data obtained from Copier County Comprehensive Planning Department (DRober data, 2006 Population Estimates and Projections) Table 2: Percentage Growth of Population Trends for Collier County and Municipalities Collier County Public School Facilities Element 3 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 190-260012-0-00-4005 2005 -2010 2010.2015 2015 -2020 2020.2025 Unincorporated Collier County % 0 25 /0 0 18 /0 0 15 /0 0 14 /0 % 7% 5% 4% 2% C 'cifx` sreo lstand "- d34%16% % 5% 5% 5% 5% 37% 4% 4% 4% Court � total % 23% 17% 15% 13% Collier County Public School Facilities Element 3 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Housing The housing data published in 2006 were collected for the City of Naples, City of Marco Island and Everglades City, and the unincorporated areas of Collier County. The data source for occupied units is the University of Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing. This data provides a more useful dataset than figures for total housing units, owing to the large number of seasonal -use housing units. In total, Collier County doubled its occupied housing between the years 1990 -2005. The municipalities show consistent growth during the same time frame. The data in Tables 3 and 4 represent existing occupied units for 1990 -2005. The Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing projects the occupied unit counts for 2010 -2025. Table 3: Housing Trends for Collier County and Municipalities uata oorameo rrom the Unwersrty or rronaa smmoerg center for Ano¢Jabre Mousing Table 4: Percentage Growth of Housing Trends 1990 1 2000 2005 1 2010 2015 1 2020 2025 Unincorporated Collier County Not Available 84,678 104,971 125,072 145,843 168,095 190,293 City ofNaples 9,808 10,785 11,682 12,421 13,297 14,271 15,227 City of Marco Island Available 7,128 7.461 7,869 8,851 9,548 10,177 Everglades City 72 182 234 294 341 387 440 Countywide Total 61,576 102,773 1 124,348 145,656 168,332 192,301 216,137 uata oorameo rrom the Unwersrty or rronaa smmoerg center for Ano¢Jabre Mousing Table 4: Percentage Growth of Housing Trends Residential Development - Growth Areas Certificate of Occupancy (CO) data was analyzed to identify where past areas of growth were located in relation current growth areas. Figure 1 displays data regarding the quantity of COs issued within unincorporated Collier County, as well as the municipalities, for the years 2001 and 2006. This snapshot of CO data shows that over time, more COs are being issued in the eastern and southern portions of the County, particularly south and east of Davis Boulevard and east toward Immokalee Road. Areas such as Golden Gate Estates and those within the more rural eastern portion of Collier County are also experiencing a larger Collier County Public School Facilities Element 4 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 1990-2000 2000 -2005 201&201012010-2015 2015.2020 2020.2025 Unincorporated Collier County Not Available 19.3% 16.1% 14.2% 13.2% 11.7% City ofNaples 9.1% 7.7% 5.9% 6.6% 6.8% 6.3% City,of Marco Island Not Available 4.5% 5.2% 11.1% 7.3% 6.2% Eye lipl" City 60.4% 22.2% 20.4% 13.8% 11.9% 12.0% Colin .IdeTotal 40.1% 17.4% 14.6% 13.5% 12.5% 11.0% Residential Development - Growth Areas Certificate of Occupancy (CO) data was analyzed to identify where past areas of growth were located in relation current growth areas. Figure 1 displays data regarding the quantity of COs issued within unincorporated Collier County, as well as the municipalities, for the years 2001 and 2006. This snapshot of CO data shows that over time, more COs are being issued in the eastern and southern portions of the County, particularly south and east of Davis Boulevard and east toward Immokalee Road. Areas such as Golden Gate Estates and those within the more rural eastern portion of Collier County are also experiencing a larger Collier County Public School Facilities Element 4 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 number of CO's being issued. Additionally, Figure 1A compares the locations of students in 2001 and 2006 to the locations of issued COs in those years. The figure indicates that the issuance of a CO does not necessarily correspond to the presence of new students, which is likely due to the construction of second or seasonal dwellings, or age- restricted communities. Growth in Collier County is expected to continue, particularly in the more rural areas of the County. The new town of Ave Maria, which has been approved for 11,000 units, is an example of a large Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in such a rural area. Figure 2 depicts the locations of the approved and new potential residential developments. Figure 2 also provides a table showing the quantity of residential units yet to be built among the 129 approved residential developments. These data were obtained from the County and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC). The developments described and shown in this figure represent existing DRI and planned unit developments (PUDs) with build -out dates of 2007 and later. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 5 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 nr 1 1, 1 1 1 ''I l i I , I , i I I -1 I I A I A I l f p. School Enrollment, Facility Capacity, and Existing Utilization During the last eight years, the Collier County School District has grown by 10,000 students, from 32,000 in 1999 to more than 42,000 in 2006. During that same time period the School District built 12 new schools. Table 5 shows the enrollment pattern for students in District -owned buildings since 2000. Enrollment reflects the October membership count. Table 5: Public School Enrollment October Membership Elementary Middle High Total Annual Growth 2000 17,389 7,538 8,949 33,876 2001 18,204 8,052 9,645 35,901 2,025 2002 18,523 8,431 10,303 37,257 1,356 2003 19,315 8,851 10,882 39,048 1,791 2004 20,524 9,173 11,608 41,305 2,257 2005 20,741 8,913 12,218 41,872 567 2006 20,433* 8,886 12,633 42,063* 191 *District -owned facilities - including Internet High School and Walker Career and Technical School Between 2000 and 2005 the district was growing at an average rate of approximately 1,500 new students a year. In 2006 the School District, like many other Florida school districts, experienced a slight decline in student enrollment in the elementary and middle grades (subsequent decline in the high schools shows a net decline for the year). The swift rise in median home prices, more investors in the housing market, an increase in the number of rental conversions to condominiums, and a larger second -home market share are some of the changes that have an impact on student enrollment. It remains to be seen if this drop in enrollment is the beginning of a trend, or simply an anomaly. An analysis of the 2006 published housing data in Collier County points to similar building permit activity as in the past, but fewer new students associated with them. The exception is in the Palmetto Ridge High School Service Area where most of the enrollment growth is occurring. Table 6 compares high school enrollment change with population and housing changes in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 9 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 6: Comparison of Population Growth and New Housing to High School Planning Area Enrollment in 2006 High School Planning Area Population Growth (2006) New Dwelling Units (2006) 2006 PK -12 Enrollment Change Baron Collier HS 1,428 692 -295 Gulf Coast HS 1,748 980 -80 Lely HS 2,299 1,545 -121 Naples HS 354 218 -32 Golden Gate HS 434 332 -289 Palmetto Ridge HS 2,571 856 396 Other 251 88 116 Total 9,084 4,711 -305 uues nuL muuoe inrerner nlgn scnooi ano walKer career and technical School Due to an aggressive building plan for the preceding six years, the school district has been able to keep pace with growth at the middle and high school levels. Only the elementary schools continue to face a deficit in 2006. Table 7 compares the capacity to enrollment by school type in 2006. Table 7: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by School Type School T e Yp Enrollment '06 (OctoberFTE) Capacity '05-06 (Permanent FISH) Utilization High Schools 12,633 13,822 91% Middle Schools 8,886 9,618 92% Elementary School 20,433 19,056 107% ,nlJUUeb Intel l rcL n/gll bCIIUUI enU VVdWer uareer ano I emnical This county -wide data, however, conceals regional differences where some schools are over capacity and others are under capacity. In 2006, 11 elementary schools, two middle schools and one high school exceeded 100 percent utilization. Currently, the School District has more than 200 relocatable classrooms to address both capacity and program needs. Existing School Facilities The School District operates 24 elementary schools, 9 middle schools, 8 high schools, and one PK -12 school with nearly 50 percent having been built since 1990. It is able to dedicate Collier County Public School Facilities Element 10 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 25 -30 percent of its capital improvement program to the renovation and upgrading of existing facilities. In addition, the School District implements a well conceived and transparent facilities maintenance program. As a result, most school buildings are in good condition and often exceed state guidelines. Table 8 shows the public schools, the year each was built and its site size, and the 2006 enrollment utilization. In addition, the existing location of the schools and ancillary facilities operated by the School District has been provided as Figure 3. Grade Structure: Most schools in the School District follow a standard grade organization with Grades PK -5 in the elementary schools, Grades 6 -8 in the middle schools, and grades 9 -12 in the high school. There are two exceptions. In Immokolee (a geographically isolated community), the elementary schools will begin serving grades PK - 6 in 2007. In Everglades City (also a geographically isolated incorporated community) all grades (K -12) are served at one school. In 2006, Manatee Middle School temporarily housed elementary students pending the opening of a new school in 2007. A 2002 statewide ballot initiative allowed voluntary attendance in a prekindergarten (PK) preparatory program for children living in Florida who turn four years old by September 1. Permanent FISH Caoacity: School districts in Florida calculate FISH (Florida Inventory of School Houses) based on state guidelines. FISH is defined as "the number of students that may be housed in a facility (school) at any given time based on a utilization percentage of the number of existing satisfactory student stations." The figure is a product of the number of classrooms at a school and the student stations assigned to each room type. FISH is the design capacity for the school building (as built) and may not reflect actual usage. It is not uncommon for a school to be at or even below permanent FISH capacity and still need relocatables to address program needs, such as for preschool education, Exceptional Student Education (ESE), English as a Second Language (ESL), or Title One reduced class sizes. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 11 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Table 8: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by School School Name Opened (Acres) Perm. -i 05106 En ©�ment - --- - Utlllzatlon High Schools Barron Collier HS 1977 98.00 1946 1778 91% Everglades City School (PK -12) 1996 4.00 481 152 32% Golden Gate HS 2003 63.00 2166 1527 70% Gulf Coast HS 1996 42.00 1955 2132 1099% Immokalee HS 1973 44.00 1737 1435 83% Lely HS 1973 50.00 2216 1540 69% Naples HS 1959 33.00 2047 1 1683 82% Palmetto Ridge HS 2003 20 - 135.00 2175 1977 91% Middle Schools Corkscrew MS 1999 60.00 1067 1459 137% East Naples MS 1968 17.00 1058 1235 117% Golden Gate MS 1982 27.00 848 M7 100% Gulfview MS 1994 11.00 657 616 94% Immokalee MS 1990 24.00 1310 1138 87% Manatee MS* 1993 46.00 1328 843 63% North Naples MS 2003 43.00 984 920 93% Oakridge MS 1992 39.00 1323 1142 86% Pine Ridge MS 197.3 37.00 1 1075 1066 99% Elementary Schools _ Avalon ES 1968 11.00 466 558 120% Big Cypress ES 1986 20.00 701 960 137% Calusa Park ES 200 1 33.00 775 1055 136% Corkscrew ES 1998 60.00 901 941 104% Estates ES 2003 8.00 767 714 93% Golden Gate ES 1973 16.00 1145 872 76% Golden Terrace ES 1988 15.00 1326 1013 760% Highlands ES 1965 13.00 466 675 145% Lake Park ES 1989 10.00 562 535 95% Lake Trafford ES 1989 15.00 891 876 98% Laurel Oak ES 1992 30.00 748 1200 160% Lely ES 1989----Z2 00 922 861 93% Manatee ES* 1993 46.00 761 796 105% Naples Park ES 1973 21.00 747 914 122% Osceola ES 2001 16.00 735 892 121% Pelican Marsh ES 1995 20.00 974 832 85% Pinecrest ES 1962 20.00 690 703 102% Poinciana ES 1973 19.00 834 718 86% Sabal Palm ES 2002 31.00 750 990 132% Sea Gate ES 1964 15.00 628 752 120% Shadowlawn ES 1959 12.00 657 638 97% Tommie Barfield ES 1972 21.00 600 721 120% Village Oaks ES 1986 20.00 692 624 90% Vineyards ES 1989 18.00 959 976 102% Collier County Public School Facilities Element 12 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 District -wide and Special Schools: In addition to the traditional school setting, the School District offers a variety of alternative programs. Some of these programs provide non - institutional settings, smaller class sizes, interagency services, or special curricula. They are typically targeted to students with disciplinary problems, truancy, drug offenses, or violent or unmotivated behavior. In addition, the district offers career and technical choice schools as alternatives to the traditional high school model. All of these schools are district -wide through student choice or special assignment. Table 9 lists the existing schools and programs. Table 9: Comparison of Capacity to Enrollment by Special School Type 'Programs are located in both Naples and Immokalee ** New buildings in 2008 Charter Schools: Currently, there are two charter schools in Collier County. Marco Island Charter School serves approximately 360 middle school students and Immokolee Community School is serving 180 elementary school students. Collier County Public Schools constructed a new building for the March Island Charter School which opened in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 14 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 District School /Program Owned Program Grade Max. Facility Enrollment Beacon High School Yes Online High School Grades 9 -12 400 Career and Technology High School (III) ** at the Yes Career High School Grades 9 -12 400 Lorenzo Walker Campus Immokolee Career and Technology Campus JJJ *` Yes Career High School Grades 9 -12 600 Big Cypress Wilderness Moderate to High Institute N O Risk Youths Grades 7 -12 35 Collier Juv. Detention No Juvenile Justice Grades 3 -12 50 Enhanced Assist* Yes Out -of- School Grades 6 -12 As required at Sus ension 15:1 ratio New Beginnings* Yes Drop-out Prevention Grades 4 -12 90 Pace No At -Risk Girls Grades 6 -12 35 Phoenix Program* Yes In lieu of expulsion Grades 6 -12 120 Sunshine School No Adolescent Grades 1 -12 20 Psychiatric Unit Teenage Parenting Pregnant Teen / Teen 160 teen parents Program* Yes Parent Grades Vary 140 children of teen parents 'Programs are located in both Naples and Immokalee ** New buildings in 2008 Charter Schools: Currently, there are two charter schools in Collier County. Marco Island Charter School serves approximately 360 middle school students and Immokolee Community School is serving 180 elementary school students. Collier County Public Schools constructed a new building for the March Island Charter School which opened in 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 14 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Student Generation Rates Public School Concurrency provides coordinated planning between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, the municipalities of Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Naples, and the District School Board of Collier County to ensure that school capacity is available at the time of impact of residential development. Currently, the School District utilizes the Florida Department of Education's (DOE) five -year, countywide projections that are updated annually. These projections are valuable, but do not provide a breakdown of the enrollment to the individual school level. The Student Generation Rate (SGR) multipliers developed by this study will provide the level of detail which will be used to accurately project the student growth that can be anticipated from a new residential development at the time of its regulatory review. Data: Three datasets were used to calculate the student generation rates. These datasets were the October 2006 student enrollment data, parcel data from the Collier County Property Appraiser's office, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) address points as provided by the Collier County GIS department. Student Data - The student population poll used in this study is from October 2006. Among the information collected in the poll is the student's current physical address (as indicated by the student). These addresses have been geocoded (geographically matched) to the Collier County address points. The geocoding procedure results in a spatial dataset that represents one geographic point per student, based on their address. Cadastral Data - The Collier County Property Appraiser (CCPA) maintains a cadastral parcel database for Collier County. CCPA maintains the county's tax parcel information in a GIS database that is updated and released on a regular basis. The GIS parcel database used in this study was obtained from the CCPA in December 2006. The Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) Property Classification Code (commonly known as a DOR Code) is assigned at the Property Appraiser's office to each parcel in the county's database. The DOR Code represents and serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. Address Point Data - The Collier County GIS department maintains a database that contains one address point for each valid physical address within Collier County. The address point database was obtained from Collier County GIS in December 2006. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 15 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Methodoloov: GIS was the business tool of choice for the analysis of student generation rates. The SGR is calculated as the number of students living in a specific housing category divided by the total number of units in the same specific housing unit type. This study examines students by their grade range and housing type. The sample size for this study is the entirety of Collier County, based on student location. The total student population used for this study was 41,502. The School District has a small population of students that do not live within the County boundary, yet attend Collier County Public Schools. These students were not included as part of this SGR analysis, as they live in other surrounding counties. Therefore, the student population used in the multiplier analysis is smaller than the total October 2006 student enrollment population as provided by the School District. The size of the dataset used in this study was large enough to offset occasional housing type assignment errors. The student data file, provided by the School District, was geocoded (geographically matched) to the Collier County address points GIS layer. The geocoding procedure results in a spatial dataset that creates one geographic point per student (similar to an X, Y location), based on their address. The geocoded student dataset does not contain information relating to housing types. The housing category data is present in the CCPA parcel database in the form of the DOR Code. In order to append this DOR Code to the student point dataset, a spatial join was performed. A spatial join is a specific type of spatial analysis whereby the attribute data from one dataset is joined to the attribute data of another dataset based on spatial location. For this study, the parcel data was spatially joined to the student point data, resulting in one GIS point file that contains both student data and housing data from the property appraiser. The DOR Code is assigned to each parcel in the county's database at the CCPA office. The DOR Code serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. The spatial join allows each parcel's unique DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database to be appended to each student point. This allows the students to be classified into one of five housing unit type categories: Single Family, Multi - Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums and Co- Operatives, and Government. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 16 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 The total number of each type of housing unit serves as the denominator in the SGR calculations. The CCPA parcel database does not contain data regarding the number of housing units for each parcel. However, Collier County GIS maintains a database of physical address points. This database contains one address point for every physical address regardless of the number of parcels (i.e.: a multi - family with 50 units will contain 50 separate, unique addresses). The CCPA parcel database was therefore geoprocessed to determine the number of address points that fall within each parcel. This was accomplished by way of a spatial join using the CCPA parcel database and the Collier County GIS Address Points database. This spatial join creates one GIS file that contains the count of units per parcel. Through specific GIS Structured Query Language (SQL) the housing type and student grade range can be selected from this database. Once selected, the number of units is summarized and this is what provides the denominator for the SGR calculations, for each housing type. Detail of the specific GIS SQL used to identify these housing types can be found in Appendix 1. Analysis and Results: Student data was analyzed on two levels: grade range, and housing type. A student's grade range was determined by their current grade rank. The grade ranges used are as follows: • Elementary: Pre - Kindergarten - 5th • Middle: 6th - 8th • High: 9th - 12th The housing type was obtained from the DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database, and was generalized into five unit type categories. For a more detailed description of DOR codes, please refer to Appendix 2. Since Condominiums and Cooperatives are grouped together, some clarification is warranted to distinguish the difference between the two. The difference between Condominiums and Cooperatives is that a condominium owner actually owns the unit, and owns an undivided interest in the common areas like parking lots, recreations areas, lobbies and hallways. In a Cooperative, the resident does not own any real estate. Rather, they own shares in a not - for - profit corporation. As a shareholder they are afforded the right to lease space in the building. The corporation owns the common areas. Generally, a condominium is considered real property and a cooperative is considered intangible personal property. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 17 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 There are a total of five students that fall within the Cooperative category. Additionally, the condominium category includes condo - conversion properties (previously apartments) which have occurred through August 2006. Further, categories that fall within a commercial category and all categories that contain less than 10 student points were omitted from this analysis. The housing categories are broken down by DOR Code in Table 10. Table 10: DOR Code, Student Count, and Housing Type Breakdown DOR Use Code Use Code DescrlpNon Student Count Housing Type 0 Vacant Residential 1,053 Evenly distributed among the five housing 1 Single Family Residential 27,598 —types Single Family 3 Multi - Family 10 units or more Retirement Homes 4,111 18 Multi - Family Multi - Family _7 8 51 Multi-Family less than 10 units Agricultural 2,329 79 Multi - Family Single Family 52 Agricultural 18 Single Family 60 Agricultural 27 Single Family _ 66 Agricultural 38 Single Family 67 Agricultural 39 Single Family 69 Agricultural 55 Single Family 71 Institutional 23 Multi - Family 75 Institutional 230 Multi - Family 79 _ Institutional 29 Multi-Family 83 Government 19 Government 86 Government 106 Government 87 Govemment 46 Government Be Government 733 Government 90 Goverrirnent 97' Government 94 Miscellaneous 24 Evenly distributed among the five housing types 99 Non -A ricultural Acreage 123 Single Family Table 11 displays the number of students by housing type and school type in Collier County as of October 2006. In addition to those students that are summarized in Table 11, a total of 1,053 students were assigned to a vacant parcel (DOR Code 0), 24 students were geocoded to a miscellaneous parcel. These results are due to a number of factors, including parcels that were once vacant, which now have a structure on it, or an incorrectly geocoded Collier County Public School Facilities Element 18 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 student record. This issue is addressed by equitably distributing these students across the five housing types. Table 11: Students by Housing Type and School Type Table 12 below displays the housing type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 12: Dwelling Units by Type Single Family Single Family Multi - Family Mobile Homes Condo/Co- O Government Elementary 11,919 3,704 1,190 1,678 492 Middle 7,063 1,462 435 867 207 High 8,942 1,574 476 1,191 302 Table 12 below displays the housing type counts based upon the GIS parcel database, as of December 2006. Table 12: Dwelling Units by Type Single Family Multi - Family Mobile Condo/Co. Government Government Elementary Homes O 0.12 73,517 18,183 10,155 84,757 1,715 Table 13 details the resulting Student Generation Rate multiplier by unit type and school type. An explanation in the differences between the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study SGR methodology and this methodology can be found in Appendix 2. Table 13: Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates To determine the student impact of a proposed residential development for school concurrency purposes, a proposed development's projected number and type of unit are converted into the number of projected students within the specific Concurrency Service Area Boundary. Based on the Student Generation Rates in Table 13, for every 100 new Collier County Public School Facilities Element 19 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Single Family Multi- Family Mobile Homes Condo/Co -Op Government Elementary 0.16 0.20 0.12 0.02 0.29 Middle 0.10 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.12 High 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.18 To determine the student impact of a proposed residential development for school concurrency purposes, a proposed development's projected number and type of unit are converted into the number of projected students within the specific Concurrency Service Area Boundary. Based on the Student Generation Rates in Table 13, for every 100 new Collier County Public School Facilities Element 19 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 single - family housing units constructed in Collier County, 38 PK -12 students will be generated, but only 16 elementary school students for the School District. Because the projection of the number of students that will be generated from new residential development is critical to the school concurrency process, a student generation multiplier was created using the student population, less those students who do not live within Collier County. Consequently, the number of students associated with a development can be calculated by applying the multiplier to the development's proposed number and type of residential housing units. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 20 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Projected Enrollment State COFTE: Around July of each year, the Florida DOE publishes grade by grade Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent ( COFTE) enrollment projections for every school district for the next 5 to 10 years. The State uses a standard 'cohort survival' method using five year enrollment trends. Table 14 identifies the pre -K through grade 12 DOE projected student growth through the school year 2010/11. This methodology is used nation -wide and is considered fairly reliable. Using the State's COFTE projections for concurrency planning poses several problems. • First, the State's projections are based on an average of two 'head counts' - one in October and one in February. Therefore, the COFTE tends to under - project the number of high school students that show up in the fall by including winter drop -outs from the spring count. For facilities planning purposes the school district wants to insure that adequate classrooms are available for the peak fall semester and therefore prefers to use the October head count as the basis for planning. • Secondly, the State's forecast is not available until July of the upcoming year. However, using an October count, the School District is able to prepare a new forecast by January. • Finally, the State's forecast does not count all of the students in the School District's buildings and includes others that are not in District -owned buildings. For example, the DOE forecast excludes students in special or alternative schools or homebound settings. The School District's enrollment for facilities planning purposes includes only students in regular schools. By contrast, the State's forecast includes only pre- kindergarten (Pre -K) students that are in special education (ESE), while the school district provides Pre -K programs for many non -ESE students. Five Year Forecast: The five year forecast is the basis for the school district's Plant Survey and Five Year Work Plan. The School District develops the data and analysis for the Work Plan in the spring for final approval by early September. Enrollment projections are prepared using the same Collier County Public School Facilities Element 21 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 standard cohort model, as the State using the State's birth projections. The School District prepares the projections school -by- school, and grade -by- grade, modifying information where boundary changes have affected trends or where staff has unique information of housing trends. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 22 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Ot N � A�� O QnQ a NON m ON y� O MQQNQOGO (O tONNrN d� V QQQQVmCI CI C)d Cl lV � O a`o r ��Q'ormmmrr QmmnQQAry aD M N M N < [p c0 V1 Q a} < M QQVQMlh Ml7MQ O� ppttOpp)OO <WOtttnpp<Oh�N�pp W(O tM0 CIO N0O0 aO0 VM1 �OMQ<Ntm(1T M QQCIMC)CIMMMmMN _g ^ mr°n ctNn�m 7 CR g mo V1 MN� -ONN jN fV MCI t7 CI lV t fV tM �.0 fV I'INN Q O N 01 AVIMWMNOIm oO GO {{ppNN M M 01 « iO 1p OO Of � O Q O O Gp O N NO)MOITmO)OOOr V) 10< N N Q O Y W cl d U d U U U U d u d L Yaaaaaavt�i °lava m N <Qn VIA M V I < 01 M M m tom M n NO.MN < npQp nao �v N iONM M QOMaG < N < < Q CIO N (O < tNO tn(1N< t0� N VI O (V OImO < N Q .-n VfM MO .- vI r Q cotn �- N t0 O lO Cf N T NN Q O N O r T O N O1MQ r O m N N m M O Q m N O Q T < O r Q ulmmM mmu`Di n°�i m tO Oat) n 07 O O m t0 N J C7 ac0 E N .N- Q c7at`Qoaa Woo 3m y Yr O � N W W T F � O O � N U nW d N d u .L.. y .L. U O a d N r � rn y tZ W C T W 0 d U W sW T �t d N d U � L d 2 u G y U d � � d a c d d .L.. d V1 d T$ r � � L L O Y� d 5 = d O N . to N C d E U1 W u u r O O N O y u u J Ln Df u J a d 'V1 y T C T c E C J a J D O C � � N y O W i j o a aa0 M NN�NtMOQ dO t0 MomV�OI mtn tOn aOO E�OQO NOO CI C C) to CI M Cl th C'1 (V lh fh Cl Ao IA o m y 10 U v O an A M WMQOOMMtONOQNIlI rnramnNinm VIM yyt0 � L LL UUO U{ry(pp lM lhh VIN NNW�AiOW CI C>M CI CI C'IM fVMMCIN LL. V W F. dO O W F w T LL Q /E N Mtn IONV OIAWMtOMlO t0 Q L �i° O yOy �CO')OC�(n rlOMmmrar NnOOGD Mt0 u W O N N CIMlh MC1MNMCJM (MN W 0 OW ao � a R (% M N NtOOm TQQ tONNQAMAtttpppp NNV�tnNrOO �(mp WOO OHO N N C) M C) M M N t7 M CI CI thN ao m° N � r F- _g ^ mr°n ctNn�m 7 CR g mo V1 MN� -ONN jN fV MCI t7 CI lV t fV tM �.0 fV I'INN Q O N 01 AVIMWMNOIm oO GO {{ppNN M M 01 « iO 1p OO Of � O Q O O Gp O N NO)MOITmO)OOOr V) 10< N N Q O Y W cl d U d U U U U d u d L Yaaaaaavt�i °lava m N <Qn VIA M V I < 01 M M m tom M n NO.MN < npQp nao �v N iONM M QOMaG < N < < Q CIO N (O < tNO tn(1N< t0� N VI O (V OImO < N Q .-n VfM MO .- vI r Q cotn �- N t0 O lO Cf N T NN Q O N O r T O N O1MQ r O m N N m M O Q m N O Q T < O r Q ulmmM mmu`Di n°�i m tO Oat) n 07 O O m t0 N J C7 ac0 E N .N- Q c7at`Qoaa Woo 3m y Yr O � N W W T F � O O � N U nW d N d u .L.. y .L. U O a d N r � rn y tZ W C T W 0 d U W sW T �t d N d U � L d 2 u G y U d � � d a c d d .L.. d V1 d T$ r � � L L O Y� d 5 = d O N . to N C d E U1 W u u r O O N O y u u J Ln Df u J a d 'V1 y T C T c E C J a J D O C � � N y O W i j o a In general, enrollment increases are expected to moderate for the next five years particularly in the middle and high school age groups. Figures 4 through 6 show projected enrollment through 2011 -12. Two changes are reflected in the elementary school graph - a slight decline in 2002 with the reduction in Pre -K programs, and an increase the following year due to a higher retention of students in the third grade. This planned retention of third grade students in 2003 echoes through the system into the middle schools in 2005. Enrollment in 2005 was less than in previous years because enrollment at the middle schools declined by more than 400 students. This is the result of the 'retained' students causing a one year change in the pattern. It is not a sign of long term growth but an anomaly that will move through the system and into the high schools in 2009. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 24 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 23000 2 2 2 t 1 '1 1 1 1 Figure 4: Projected Elementary School Enrollment through 2011 -12 Sementary School Forecast i 9 9 8 8 7 7 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 L 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 School Year Projections 2000 2006 20,433 1000 20,761 328 2008 0000 398 2009 21,603 9000 2010 8000 542 2011 1 22,690 7000 , 6000 5000 000 4000 i 9 9 8 8 7 7 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 L 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 School Year Projections Change 2006 20,433 2007 20,761 328 2008 21,159 398 2009 21,603 444 2010 22,145 542 2011 1 22,690 1 545 Figure 5: Projected Middle School Enrollment through 2011 -12 Middle School Forecast 15000 14000 13000 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 School Yea Projections 500 2006 8,997 2007 I 000 2008 9,241 355 500 9,171 -70 2010 9,292 121 000 9,528 236 , 500 000 15000 14000 13000 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 School Yea Projections Change 2006 8,997 2007 8,886 -111 2008 9,241 355 2009 9,171 -70 2010 9,292 121 2011 9,528 236 Figure 6: Projected High School Enrollment through 2011 -12 High School Forecast 00'. ppry p0"� OOP p05 Op0 p01 F, p00 p,�0 p, ti ti ti � ti `ti ti ry ti ti ti School Yea Projection Change 2006 12,633 2007 12,844 211 2008 12,772 -72 2009 13,308 536 2010 13,557 249 2011 13,830 1 273 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 25 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Projected Capacity Over the next five years, school enrollment is projected to grow by approximately 3,000 students. To meet this demand and address current capacity needs, the School District plans on opening four new elementary schools, two new career high schools, and constructing classroom additions at eight elementary schools and one middle school for a total of 6,472 additional seats. This will allow the District to achieve and maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) of 100 percent of permanent FISH capacity for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSA), a LOS of 95 percent of permanent FISH capacity for middle school and a LOS 95 of percent of permanent FISH capacity for elementary school CSAs. The elementary and middle school CSAs are to have a lower LOS than that of the high school CSAs in order to allow those school types the opportunity to continue to provide special programs that require smaller classes. It also provides these school types additional latitude to provide the desired physical capacity and program capacity, while reducing the need for relocatable classrooms. Table 15 provides a list of the projects, capacity added, and planned opening date. Figure 7 identifies the location of property owned by the School District and the location future schools by school type, and the general location of future ancillary facilities in the county. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 26 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 15: Proposed New School and Additions through 2011 -12 NEW SCHOOLS Planning Number Opened / Completed Additional /New capacity Elementary Schools Calusa Park Area G 2008 909 Golden Gate Area J 2008 909 Immokalee K 2008 792 Golden Gate Area North L 2008 909 High Schools Lorenzo Walker Career HS III 2008 440 Immokalee Career Center 2008 600 Total New School ADDITIONS - -- _- 4,559 New Capacity School New Classrooms Opened/ Completed Avalon ES 8 2009 160 Calusa Park ES 10 2008 178 Estates ES 10 2008 196 Highlands ES 23 2007 453 Pinecrest ES 11 2007 220 Shadowlawn ES 10 2011 172 Tommie Barfield ES 11 2010 171 Village Oaks ES 6 2007 110 Golden Gate MS 11 2008 253 Subtotal Additions: 1,913 Total All Projects: 6,472 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 27 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 10 and 20 Year Forecast The first five years of the School District's enrollment forecast are based on a standard cohort survivor model modified to reflect housing and program trends. This method is reliable for three to five years of enrollment projections. However, it is not sufficient to forecast many years into the future. As the forecast attempts to predict housing development, population growth, and educational policy for 10 and 20 years, it is better to look beyond individual schools and to use County -level trends in population projections and zoning and land use capacity. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department has developed population projections by planning community through the year 2029. These projections were used as the basis for development of the District's 10- and 20 -year enrollment projections. Between 2000 and 2005 the overall population grew by 21 percent from 257,926 to 326,605. In 2000, the 33,876 students enrolled in Collier County's schools represented just over 13 percent (13.1 %) of the County's overall population. While PK -12 enrollment in Collier County schools grew by 19 percent between 2000 and 2005, the portion of the overall population it represented declined slightly to just under 13 percent (12.8 %). This percentage is projected to continue declining over the next 20 years as the county, and nation as a whole, grows older. Although the percentage of the population that student enrollment represents is expected to continue declining, enrollment in Collier County schools is expected to moderately increase over the next 20 years. As of October 2006, the School District had 43,397 students in grades pre- kindergarten through 12th grade. By 2017 this number is projected to grow by approximately 24 percent to over 55,900 students. Between 2017 and 2027 enrollment is projected to increase to nearly 73,700 students. This updated forecast shows a decrease in the rate of growth and 9,500 fewer students over the next 20 years when compared to last year's 20 -year enrollment projections. Tables 16 thorough 19 below provide a summary of the anticipated long range student enrollment and capacity needs for the School District. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 29 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 16: 10 -Year School District Enrollment Forecast Table 17: 30 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Plannino Area School Type Location Planned Capacity Additional Total Existing and d gdditlonal 909 District FY 2017/18 Existing Planned 2012 Protected Schools Totals Enrollment Capacity Through capacity Through FY 2012 Urban Estates Planning Community 1,957 2016 011 Through 2017 2017 8,631 9 Middle 15,338 2012 3,170 3 Elementary 27,543 18,712 7,083 25,795 1,818 2 Middle 11,656 9,618 1,418 11,036 1,132 1 High 16,788 13,822 0 13,822 3,844 2 Total 55,987 43,266 8,501 50,653 6,794 5 Table 17: 30 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Plannino Area School Type Location Planned Capacity Approximate Year Elementary "O" South Naples Planning Community 909 2012 Elementary "Q" Ave Maria Community 909 2012 Middle "GG" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,258 2017 High "EEE" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,957 2012 High "GGG" Urban Estates Planning Community 1,957 2016 Total Elementary 6,990 27,613 Table 18: 20 -Year School District Enrollment Forecast Collier County Public School Facilities Element 30 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Total Additional District FY 2027128 Existing and planned Planned planned #Schools Totals Projected Capacity FY2017- Enrollment Through Through 2027 2017 2027 Elementary 36,244 27,613 8,631 9 Middle 15,338 12,168 3,170 3 High 22,092 17,666 4,426 2 Total 73,674 1 57,447 16,227 1 14 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 30 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 19: 20 -Year Recommended Additional School District Capacity by County Planning Area School Type Location Planned Capacity Approximate Year Elementary "P" Rural Estates Planning Community 909 2019 Elementary "S" Royal Fakapalm Planning Community 909 2020 Elementary "T" Urban Estates Planning Community 909 2022 Elementary "U" Corkscrew Planning Community 909 2018 Elements W" Royal Faka alm Planning Community 909 2024 Elementary "X" Rural Estates Planning Community 909 2025 Elementary "Y" Corkscrew Planning Community 909 2023 Elementary "Z" Urban Estates Planning Community 909 2026 Elementary "A" Royal Fakapalm Planning Community 909 2027 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 8 Classroom Addition TBD Elementary School 160 2021 Middle "DD" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,258 2021 Middle "II" Corkscrew Planning Community 1,258 2024 Middle "JJ" South Naples Planning Community 1,258 2027 High "HHH" Corkscrew Planning Community 1,957 2019 High "DDD" Rural Estates Planning Community 1,957 2027 16 Classroom Addition TBD High School 400 2023 8 Classroom Addition TBD High School 200 2023 Total 16,949 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 31 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Concurrence Service Areas School Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) are the geographic areas in which the level of service (LOS) standard is measured for each school type when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. A fundamental requirement of school concurrency is the establishment of these areas. This includes the option to establish a district -wide (the entire County) CSA, or less than district -wide (smaller geographic areas) CSAs. These CSAs are used to determine whether adequate capacity is available to accommodate new students generated from residential development for a school type; i.e., elementary, middle, and high schools. The legislature allows school concurrency to be applied district -wide initially, but requires that it be applied on a less than district -wide basis within five years of adoption (Chapter 163.3180(13)(c)1, FS). When applying school concurrency on a less than district -wide basis, the school district is required to maximize utilization of their schools and to apply "adjacency" for available capacity when reviewing residential development. Maximizing utilization requires the School District to evaluate school enrollment and attempt to balance the enrollment by shifting children from a CSA that is over its adopted LOS standard to a CSA that is under the LOS capacity to the greatest extent possible. When capacity is not available within a CSA at the adopted LOS of the school type, new residential development can take into consideration capacity in the adjacent CSA of the directly impacted service area (adjacency). School Concurrency Service Areas for Collier County Currently, the School District, the County and the participating local governments have decided to use less than district -wide CSAs. This form of CSA allows the review for available capacity to occur at the schools most likely to be impacted by the new residential development. If available capacity is not present, the adjacent CSAs will be analyzed for capacity. The CSAs were created using GIS, based on Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) for Collier County. A description of the methodology used to create the CSAs can be found in Appendix 3. There are a total of 32 CSAs for Collier County Public Schools: 15 Elementary School CSAs, 8 Middle School CSAs, and 8 High School CSAs. The individual TAZ numbers that were merged to create each CSA boundary are summarized in Tables 20 through 22. The Collier County Public School Facilities Element 32 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Elementary, Middle, and High School Concurrency Service Area maps are referenced as Figures 8 through Figure 10. In addition to the District - operated schools with defined attendance boundaries, Collier County contains several schools of choice. These include District - operated schools that enroll only those students who apply for admission, as well as charter schools not operated by the District. One example of the latter is Marco Island Charter Middle School. This school is not currently included in a CSA, but at such time as the utilization in the M2 - Southwest Area CSA is affected by residential development, the utilization of the Charter school would be taken into consideration. Currently, Marco Island Charter serves as a middle school for attendance by Marco Island Middle School students only, with no District transportation provided. With the projected residential growth in the M2 CSA anticipated for the mainland, eventually impacting Manatee Middle School and the CSA's LOS, an evaluation of the Charter school's enrollment and projected growth at that time may be factors in determining the necessity of its inclusion into the CSA. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 33 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Table 20: Elementary School CSA breakdown CSA /D CSA Name TAZ Et Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 E2 Southwest South CSA 306 -313, 317 -334, 337 -340, 343 -346 E3 Southwest North CSA 233, 244, 246, 247, 249, 277, 278, 280, 287 -298, 301 -305, 314, 355 -362 E4 Golden Gate Area CSA 196 -211, 245, 248, 251 -257, 264 -266 112, 117, 118, 120, 122, 157 -160, 170, E5 Naples Area CSA 171, 175 -179, 181 -183, 185 -187, 189, 191,195 1 -24, 27 -34, 45-48, 51, 56 -58, 61, 64 -70, E6 Northwest Area CSA 119, 121, 123, 124, 151 -156, 166 -169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 250, 258 -263, 267, 270 -276, 279, 281 -284 37 -44, 52, 53, 73 -84, 91, 93, 102 -109, E7 Northwest Area CSA 113 -116, 125 -144, 147, 148, 162 -165, 172 E8 Northwest Area CSA 85 -90, 92, 94 -101, 161, 180, 184, 188, 190, 219, 220, 365 -377 E9 Northwest Area CSA 212 -215, 217, 218, 221 -225, 227 -232, 234 -241, 391, 393 E10 North Central Area CSA 216, 387, 389, 390, 392, 394 -403 Ell Immokalee Area CSA 417 -422, 426, 427, 430 -436 E12 Immokalee ES2 CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 -413, 416, 425, 428, 429 E13 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 386 E14 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 353,354 E15 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 347, 348, 352, 378 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 34 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Table 21: Middle School CSA breakdown CSA /D CSA Name TAZ M1 Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 1 -24, 27 -34, 37 -48, 51 -53, 56 -58, 61, 64- 70, 119, 121, 123, 124, 147, 151 -156, M2 Southwest Area CSA 166 -169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 230, 233, 244 -267, 270 -284, 287 -298, 301 -314, 317 -334, 337 -340, 343 -346, 355 -362 M3 North Central CSA 196 -217, 222 -225, 227 -229, 234 -237, 239, 387, 389 -402 H3 North Central CSA 73 -109, 112-118,120, 122, 125 -144, M4 Northwest CSA 148, 157 -165, 170 -172, 175 -191, 195,218 -221, 231, 232, 238, 240, 241, H4 Northwest CSA 365 -377, 403 M5 Immokalee CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 -413, 416 -422, 425- H5 Immokalee CSA 436 M6 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 386 M7 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 353,354 M8 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge Areas 347, 348, 352, 378 Table 22: High School CSA breakdown -D - CSA / - - - CSA _- - Na- me - -TA -- - Z H1 Everglades City CSA 349, 350, 351 1 -24, 27 -34, 37 -48, 51 -53, 56 -58, 61, 64- 70, 119, 121, 123, 124, 147, 148, 151 - H2 Southwest CSA 156, 166 -169, 173, 174, 192 -194, 246- 250, 255 -263, 265 -267, 270 -284, 287- 298, 301 -314, 317 -334, 337 -340, 343- 346, 355 -357, 361, 362 196 -217, 222 -225, 227 -230, 233 -237, H3 North Central CSA 239, 244, 245, 251 -254, 264, 358 -360, 387, 389-403 73 -109, 112 -118, 120, 122, 125 -144, H4 Northwest CSA 157 -165, 170 -172, 175 -191, 195, 218- 221, 231, 232, 238, 240, 241, 365 -377 H5 Immokalee CSA 379 -385, 388, 404 -413, 416 -422, 425- 436 H6 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge 386 Areas H7 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge 353,354 Areas H8 Conservation or Wildlife Refuge 347, 348, 352, 378 Areas Collier County Public School Facilities Element 35 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Level of Service The level of service (LOS) standards, which are adopted in the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) as well as in the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and Capital Improvements Element (CIE), are used to establish maximum permissible school utilization relative to the total capacity within a CSA. An essential component of determining the LOS standard for the geographic areas of the CSAs is the School District's ability to adopt a financially feasible capital program that can achieve and maintain the LOS standard by school type for each CSA. The school concurrency program's LOS standards balance the School District's ability to finance a capital program with its ability to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS for public schools. The establishment of a LOS standard ensures that new or expanded school facilities are built in time to accommodate students generated from new residential developments. If the capacity does not exist to support the students generated by the new development, both the new students and the schools are burdened with overcrowding issues. The Florida Legislature recognizes that an essential requirement for a concurrency system is the LOS standard at which a CSA is expected to operate. The new language established in Chapter 163.3177(12)(c), F.S. requires that the public school facilities element be "based upon data and analysis that address, among other things, how the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained." The ability to achieve and maintain the LOS must be based on a financially feasible Five -Year Capital Plan, adopted annually by the School Board as prescribed in Chapter 163.3180(13)(d)(1), F.S. The LOS standards will be adopted into the CIE of the local governments' comprehensive plans and must apply district -wide for the CSAs of all schools of the same type (elementary, middle, and high) as required in Chapter 163.3180 (13)(b)(3), F.S.. School Level of Service for Collier County The LOS standards for Collier County will be 100 percent of the permanent FISH capacity for high school CSAs and a LOS of 95 percent of the permanent FISH capacity for middle school CSAs and elementary school CSAs. Based on the School District's financially feasible Five - Year Capital Plan, there will be no CSAs which exceed the LOS standards in Collier County at the end of the five year planning period. Due to the School District's ability to achieve and maintain a LOS of no more than 100 percent for high schools and 95 percent for elementary and middle schools, there is no need to establish a tiered LOS at this time, or to isolate certain overcapacity schools in long -term management program. Tables 23 -1 through 23- Collier County Public School Facilities Element 39 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 20 identify the schools located in each CSA, their existing capacity, their current enrollment and their projected enrollment for the current five -year planning period. In addition, the tables identify the solutions (new schools, additions, etc.) which will be used to maintain the adopted LOS standard. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 40 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 C? u O 0 ca 2 a w d U Z ui W t. _T cc Q d c O u O.0 ee,- N eee ! L d C O nL d U E C O 0 0 O cn O y N � C N do d N a (n co o a m o m m W N d 3 d w N N 0 U E oW L m U O U 0 0 N C C rn;M L Z C M ID E m nc o e m° O O i 0 O W �Y N N d C OD Z O U C N O > 0, 00 C N N �O N d C J d N CO O I p 0 d o _ O d cn 0 fAW J T c Q 0 � O 6 i N m U C U m r Ni d d O E -�Z E o6 E m E m- 6 _d O 9? d _ d > y'OO W U w N W W Q N O m r r Ni e e e e e O � m m m N N m A U N', O N 2I� W r N M N o mN •O O °� O O O] a o> U N 00 °o I W r 0 0 o m n r � g m d °o N G O ar0 r b Um ^ 0 0 yw. is'O o � .aOO �LL l J d I g Lg U O tJ W N [n ti o � O c c d m m c m t x v d U U) o aEi w U W I11 W W� O.0 N O ! L d C O nL d U E C O 0 0 O cn O y L d U d y� C N do d N a (n co �Ec 0)c E W N d 3 d w N N 0 U E oW L m U O U 0 0 Q C C U U L Z C M ID E m nc ~ o a O O 0 p U 0 O (0 �Y N N d C OD Z O U C N O > 0, 00 C N N �O N d C J d N CO O I p 0 d o _ O d cn 0 fAW J T c Q 0 � U i U C d d N d d d d 0 E -�Z E o6 E m E m- 6 _d O 9? d _ d > y'OO W U w N W W Q W N N 2 3 v f.. C n O u m a Q d Y c0 C N W T T m C Q V d 7 v C 0 U e m Ere �a c � a m d N tp Ol o i C N r I�10 W IN o e e o, A °o N w N � a a�i w E z y OI W 2 0 _ E ` d d 0 0 m �a t� N N N "O N iA C d W .0 a0 p a O d W 0 d N m N 'M T O m o m d 0 Y m °o rn � � 3 o Z y cv m �° m m c cLi o 0 p O ?�U N p L r N N— p 10 N N 'C c d _ p L 3 N .0 ' U -o E -Z a a c d d m W o Q ° o o o d o :- 3.2 . :O V L N O O > ID O N O~ O p c C OC E T O N W 3 O Y m O( a - O d C d d y N J =p C d � mL 00 m d ? N L O d 0 O Q Y 0 U1 0 r U W ao a U) m « " c C N p� U) a; `d W ? °o N m y O c m d D o_ A Y d C d d N C O vi C E C Y ~ d J C Q d O 10 E .c y 0 d L 00.1 d� U U m m U W F- W d U) 2 Q m J 0) CO e� 3 C 4 Q e N CO) W d M r W 1; T io c Q U C 7 V C O U c 3 O r C 0 IL w 0 Y «O p = m m m D N � C N 0) �� O 0) C U U O U C p 0 U lb t0 fn v 0o m 0 3 U 3 m Nmo I� N d Zaci C cc L E U O O p N Nf O w yO Q c w U C C C C 0 e e 0 c c U1 L y 0 N 0 = m o m m m O 0 Q O O C L v 0 I w t U= Q w 3 u a m I fA E o y m LOE W A r N O E N U d J c U U Im NO.N N 0 A O W H m a N > aci o N M O w e o a I e N tV U r W N m O O N O N O N t1 w N e e a a a, 0 n � m W °o N o m m h w n m W � OI w � i a o n ~ r e = w N O o m m m °o m a rn rn U I 0 c w N O> Of LL i c it W � N w m w � r L m O � m v u c V l a > w c 3 O r C 0 IL w 0 Y «O p o D C C N 0) �� O 0) C U U O U C p 0 U lb t0 fn v 0o m 0 3 3 m Nmo Z d Zaci C cc L E U O 6 N N O y N O w yO Q c N O U C C C C 0 CD E a O c c U1 L y 0 N 0 O CL 3 t c O 0 Q O O C L v 0 I w t U= Q w 3 u a m I fA E o y m LOE W A r N O E N 0 d J c U U Im NO.N N C A O W H m a d > aci 3 m 'c. e J n O 0 0 0 h h U n 3 U) U) W y e o el� N N n _ N i o' a m m uNi N, m r r of U o _ N O N N Ni C r W E rn m I �S �o II N O N N w I L i oe e A I r N p1 O � r c c � °o N m U � N O m N N V w O N m r to M U o !Ii (Vi Olm NO W L I eIa "le _ryryIIe N�. O d oil Ir a w fle o v o V N f7 alb ol� m r <nln U o m N e w o r m! I V I U) w O Y m a 0 m C C N a O UJ w L_ 3 Q1 C N O C N N Vl D 0 o V IL to I W m W o N m N E c m m w f? w GO w U m d U O O N O "O Q 10 W 9 m IE m to m E 0 e� 23 C OI J T � C Q I T w V v a C d d � i t V n W m 2 o s o s E a U I U) w O Y m a 0 m C C N a O UJ w L_ 3 Q1 C N O C N N Vl D 0 o V IL to I W m W o N m N E c m m w f? w GO w U m d U O O N O "O Q 10 W 9 m IE m to m E 0 e� 23 C OI J r 4 0 0 N N � W U UA r O C w e o e N th N trf r � N e NN O4nN W oOE w e I eq N N U N O V V C W e � 1 0 0 0 r � 0 U 0 0 C W I LA T m j a 1 V I d VO 0 o v U fA N L E 0 0 .c w- y N C 'O O y T O N L U p_ t0 N O N N T � y C O O n�U °o « d 0 C O NEU y E O ~ O d I � � C 'O U - � O y G O O m > y t V _ > f0 w O Y a E e� 3 d c a rn C n O U O O r Z N U H 3 w O CO) W F N � 0 o m N m N m m rn rn U N 0 W N e e — m m mm �,U N O i W N a o e e — m m o � � Vim m �i0 O N O _ Wi N ,I m N m m N O v m m a N N o co M MIS, !'. m W HI e o e o ie = N m m q U. IN i I c m r m W N FFeI\ o e -- II �r jia 0 Oi O O v"'i m yl w LL 6 V T i. N i {Up N ;A- cu C a c U O C O L U,m N w ° w E 3' G N To d C w d d E 2 N d d O O d c d CL m O O y ED V OO L n� 3 p C N G D N d C N .- °o c E E C� `v n w o d CO Q T C d N G Q I d J d u N 0 N UJ I m W d d m c W m v m d a 1 W E d Y m N >,o y N W Q 0 d � J .� 3' G N To j / k 2 \ / _ Z \c \ \ \t ! \7) (0(D E(n ƒ y § ; f§$§ ( (L ) \{ E ;k�( 0 § k§ \§ CO) J um ; a9�&O \f\{ co \)M ® kf o � } C -4 \ U)N0 : =22;04 = \ j\D & = f e,,a,= ®2§�a®[` + §\)k©\ - ) §z \ $ r, f z ■ M f{ 2D CL \ �))§k/ Z n 0 v Q 0 ro Q d 0 W T Ip C � Q a v c J O C O °o t V h o e e o o T,' m m r r r e D ' {__.. 'e { m N 0 0 N N � I I I pm m m u uo mim ' '. V r rn m m m m m, F. Mm i III '�\W ICI OIL R m. rn �o I W s � 0 m U�m rn � mIQI ! O W N m � c m Oo AiN = M m mml n O O N m o! N O r Q m o m m � m r � w�0 r U r C7 O W v w a _q m 0 E E o 'v E U w W (7 T O t U N V C d E d r. c 0 0 L U IO E a d w L N d J C C d O L_ W y W Y d C fd0 U � d d � H d d � E (� C O 01 C d M O Ln r ~ U �n d Z C O d N E c o c o d Q 'O GO 5o 00 N CL C I U M W L Y U IL C � EJ Ud W 0 C a d 'd0 T � d O C d � N C Q7 � n T w J U N � N C,d t0 U n oU O m d N ao O d I y CD O _ t d O d L J rcaz N O CC) EE d _ d W � W LY] H U f0 a U r 0 N c T d d a O O O L d y r C d E d W C CQ O L U N i (0 E d w L O N d U C C CD E O C W I � W N d U O d t7 d d .o E o ?� (' G N C A J c m Oo AiN = M m mml n O O N m o! N O r Q m o m m � m r � w�0 r U r C7 O W v w a _q m 0 E E o 'v E U w W (7 T O t U N V C d E d r. c 0 0 L U IO E a d w L N d J C C d O L_ W y W Y d C fd0 U � d d � H d d � E (� C O 01 C d M O Ln r ~ U �n d Z C O d N E c o c o d Q 'O GO 5o 00 N CL C I U M W L Y U IL C � EJ Ud W 0 C a d 'd0 T � d O C d � N C Q7 � n T w J U N � N C,d t0 U n oU O m d N ao O d I y CD O _ t d O d L J rcaz N O CC) EE d _ d W � W LY] H U f0 a U r 0 N c T d d a O O O L d y r C d E d W C CQ O L U N i (0 E d w L O N d U C C CD E O C W I � W N d U O d t7 d d .o E o ?� (' G N C A J r � w�0 r U r C7 O W v w a _q m 0 E E o 'v E U w W (7 T O t U N V C d E d r. c 0 0 L U IO E a d w L N d J C C d O L_ W y W Y d C fd0 U � d d � H d d � E (� C O 01 C d M O Ln r ~ U �n d Z C O d N E c o c o d Q 'O GO 5o 00 N CL C I U M W L Y U IL C � EJ Ud W 0 C a d 'd0 T � d O C d � N C Q7 � n T w J U N � N C,d t0 U n oU O m d N ao O d I y CD O _ t d O d L J rcaz N O CC) EE d _ d W � W LY] H U f0 a U r 0 N c T d d a O O O L d y r C d E d W C CQ O L U N i (0 E d w L O N d U C C CD E O C W I � W N d U O d t7 d d .o E o ?� (' G N C A J T O t U N V C d E d r. c 0 0 L U IO E a d w L N d J C C d O L_ W y W Y d C fd0 U � d d � H d d � E (� C O 01 C d M O Ln r ~ U �n d Z C O d N E c o c o d Q 'O GO 5o 00 N CL C I U M W L Y U IL C � EJ Ud W 0 C a d 'd0 T � d O C d � N C Q7 � n T w J U N � N C,d t0 U n oU O m d N ao O d I y CD O _ t d O d L J rcaz N O CC) EE d _ d W � W LY] H U f0 a U r 0 N c T d d a O O O L d y r C d E d W C CQ O L U N i (0 E d w L O N d U C C CD E O C W I � W N d U O d t7 d d .o E o ?� (' G N C A J cc J ) � # k _ £ [ - [2�2k/2 \ \} iu \ % {§ CD = / ƒ �- \/ ) = - _ ( \k ;E @ >�2 \) /. !R ��0 #/ \\ 00 �§ ;\ (=q } `( E7 £ [ - \ \} iu \ % {§ CD = / ƒ �- \/ ) = - _ ( \k ;E @ >�2 \) /. !R ��0 #/ \\ 00 �§ ;\ (=q } `( E7 ; G CO) 2\ 2 CD §§§§ m§ 0 §7 G§ $! s u(L £ [ - \ \} iu \ % {§ CD = / ƒ �- \/ ) = - _ ( \k ;E - \) /. !R ��0 #/ \\ 00 �§ ;\ (=q } `( E7 ; G CO) 2\ 2 CD £ [ - \ \} \ % {§ CD = / ƒ �- \/ ) = - _ ( \k - \) !R �\ #/ �§ ;\ (=q } `( E7 0 ! |® 2\ 2 / §k /} 0 G§ $! s u(L ƒ §M LT- ( �\ ) §f \ 0} § L¥ LLI Lu - f\\ % a7; j * (L® «®/ $ J �§ iT\ � E\ cL )> J A uz& £ 4 0 0 a N � h U N W o W cu e o e e = D7 m O Of Gi n or °m vri u• o U o ' o'er N� 0 M N f0I i O m A i Y C N r m T ' V W o .e �I 0 o n o e r U m, OI O t0 N In � W r la m m m m m � f N T iv Q V dl t _ o c 0 L U rn N' O N ty V N w \ K: e < m r N o v r a r M m e U N o M° W O m r m ao w e I m'A Y w a x c � E [p O L d J d N W C d E O `c N o m o L G O L C N N Ol C O � 41 C U O O 2 L I 1 O N W W w C e a m d E s ° E r m w -j a n _T U m a U O N C O Q I rn W C 3 _R 3 0 v m s fA N 3 C a cu ID at z m m e o m e N •- NOj O O N m N m N W r O! m m m m 7 o i eyo i as aaa� m 7 O�1 m m OIL O d m O m V c] m M m O O y U U rn rn� rn m ' wr NyM AIM.,. O rn o °e m m rn m I O y m U T OL N O �N O w T m fm ,� N� N 0 � O r � 01 ONJ S O L U CO t0 O �p V m m Mr L W U � M O _ N N O C rL i U N I O m V N C 6 ? O Z O N 0 00 w = a N O_ N to C � v a w > m N y m m U) d (° o C d z V w Y E 0 m6t 0 : . p o m m c8x1 � m a�w w 2 z Oa U Q,= z° o a m m L O a e 0 Q 0 m e 3 N� l ttI e � I pole O CL O ' w e'e � m m m I O N _ OO M n o C W [O m � Null ' N N N o C W ONi I I N 1AT I O,� NCINI��' U N 3 G J �IW l ttI e � I pole CL O ' I O N _ OO M n C W [O m � Null o � W 0 C _O �I Q m ole a a o 111 of � '3 m mim L5 p C C a) a) y N > > N c' 'j O C O T 0 O a- c rn I W 6 � ` 'O cu p d o f a7 O c w uN aa)E W C E l O U' � W O V U N O> wi N 3 G J � § k k x 3 IL) f . {&£\; CD \ (\kco £« o ) _:® >7E ) co §)_ ( ;K® Z \0 \ } (\ co \ka § ° 2 0 )k{( \ x ! u a) E §2 2 )r I 2 !;!2 f CD \ (\kco £« o ) _:® >7E ) co §)_ ( ;K® Z \0 \ } (\ co \ka § ° 2 0 )k{( \ x ! u a) E f N d t d w C a a 3 x v d c c w a� o E Vl N_ L T r C A m L C Q C N O V C1 02 �+ y V N d T � C N � w L C 3 d U E C O. O O V d N > L y r 'D C � w c 3 m v V1 d J. N T A C Q T V C r � 4 L O c 0 6 0 11 a c m a y T °oo_ezie 10 a c m w 3 N � m a •= G o a c I m o 4 N U r m r N O N � N 2 I O W W N a e e e e t0 N r m m m r a r � U N P oo m m c ^ ^ ^ W 7 o_ r v an r m r ff W 0 0 o a e I m o U N m o, o rn o v v Iwo m rN N a e = m eo m a O � O y r 0 o _ W N W O r � a v r m o y N� m r m r Yf (l. N UN 0 m m r v N N y T 10 a c m w W L 4 m a 0 G m c s 4 C o U N z a fn 0 O C C CL 0 w L_ 3 N C O (D N E O 7 C Co N Co C E O W W I W O O 0) m W o iq x E :°. a c 0 c 01 y IO m d) W 2> N Ol C U 0 2 I N W r cc A e RI U .O a 3 G a J W +°3 m C7 e d a 0 C7 H un LU W A M x d C c �a ay Z E N_ N T t V C R L O Q C d O ° v O Y ,d^ V v' d T C N � Y � C O d C1 E c a° O V d N > t d " a c m w c �3 d T N T W C a T V C � L O L R " C o U a N O C a J n 4 Q 0 m m i Q N d 3 0 Z W w T A c V C V C O U N O O L N v C d N y O C d0 N O O O � ` L U _ 00 dU) 06 O O CN � O W m C C_ N r C n J d c O U d C ww aW d a O L d U �w Zyo CO O U C N =p O W O Z C O E N N ac m CL d O C O Y E N C w I d d W d > N 0 C N ? t d d N A y aE c C 0 d 'c W 0— W m m c Y W 0 N N G N L d O E N E d o o J N J N R 3 d a e a t Oi To Q 0 w z a yr e 0 U 41 m 2 N T A C Q T V C n � o L 3 v v O c o U d c c 0 ad o � c «. N N_ t V d A V V Q C d U V O w d V � d T � c N i w L C d � E C a° O U � N � t d w 'O C A L.. c �3 a� N d Q: _Q a G m a N 3 i O Z W Mn w R C Q v C n N o_ O c O L O U ifn e m� — m a N N m m w e e e co m rn a U m m O N N � m m W e � X10 a m � N Q N Nii N N � m m W c e v - � T O] � O O d O O m 0 0 CIO o Nm ° °Im m U 0 0 CAA m W' e o e r � N m N e m f7 g m m LL q w CC O J N C U E o W dv o @ m co T c U r a9) m U N � W Z O C � y C O N C C O O «. y � w 0 Q L_ O 1 3 t N w N W N N IV 6 N 7 E v o� d rnco W m N N 3 G a 4 0 0 co t c if e , e yo n rn m n Z 2 e-�°�M W 1= = t= oarn min O O N O � SIN W` o e e 1 O U rn 0 � O O m VN 1ry rn � N � Off] r fop U m 0 0 W e e — Mid m � O p m e0� Ni 10 ^n' U jn 0 o� m m� N O W �I n � om m U 0 O Off N .N T; 10 ' C v C L I o C 0 t U N S Y3 �i m � n IL �N i F V rn fA W L, E Em E iO m w in N O O L O U) c d E m W C E o O L N (n a ID a E O N o W IT U a am U (gyp 3 U Z C OD0 N o mN C N y W Oy I � o U G O 0— E AD W � O C N o N GJ N .t.. C c 3 .E d � O C E E 2-2 C C GI O C o 0 a2 I O0 LL, N C E� .a Co E 0 d) % m m (1 W m m 3 G W J Co- location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School District and the Local Governments. The School District will look for opportunities to co- locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Educational Plant Survey. Likewise, co- location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the local governments when preparing the updates to their Comprehensive Plan, Schedule of Capital Improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities which may be compatible with schools. For example, opportunities for co- location and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, and stadiums. Coordinated planning for co- location and joint use will result in capital savings for the School District and Local Governments and create community focal points. Co- location and shared use of facilities are important tools in budgeting and community building for the School District and Local Governments. Collier County is 2,025 square miles in area, and includes the cities of Naples, Marco Island and Everglades City. Most of the county's land area is inland and some distance from the Gulf of Mexico. The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department plays a key role in providing water and beach access, as well as providing alternative, land -based activities. Through the State's coordinated planning requirements for school concurrency, Local Governments and the School District are directed to recognize the benefits and opportunities realized through the sharing of facilities and costs to the greatest extent possible. The School District would benefit from joint use of parks in the vicinity of public schools, due largely to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department's dedication to promoting health and wellness, alternative leisure activities, community involvement through sports and special events for County residents. Figure 11 displays locations of current and proposed school locations, as well as parcels of County -owned land and locations of County facilities. A number of proposed school locations are located adjacent to parcels owned by the County, including the Future "R" Elementary, Future "JJ" Middle, Future "EEE" High, Future °GGG" High, and Future °JJJ" High Schools. For appropriate County properties that are not already programmed, these adjacencies could provide the opportunity for co- location of County and School District facilities for the purpose of enhancing the quality of life for area residents and students. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 42 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The East Naples Community Park refurbishments, soccer field and center expansion, may create an opportunity to establish a relationship with the School District for mutual use in exchange for use of schools for community meeting purposes. The planning of Manatee Community Park is in Phase I of its development, with construction time still to be determined. This park, as well as the large regional parks in Collier County including Orangetree Regional Park and North Collier Regional Park, may provide coordination opportunities with the School District. The North Collier Regional Park's Exhibit Hall currently provides learning opportunities for students, and the softball and basketball courts at Max A. Hasse Jr. Community Park provide centrally located recreation opportunities to several sections of Collier County, including Golden Gate Estates and the rural North Naples areas. Co- location is intended to provide efficient use of existing infrastructure and discourage sprawl. Identification early in a budget cycle and coordination among agencies will promote successful and effectively utilized public facilities. The School District and the County Department of Parks and Recreation currently maintain negotiated shared -use agreements as part of existing co- location efforts. Each agreement, and the stipulations contained therein, are site - specific and are situationally dependent. Cost effective co- location or joint use of School District or Local Government-owned property could provide substantial savings for existing and future public facilities. The model of cooperation that exists between the School District and County Department of Parks and Recreation could act as the model for coordination between the School District and other entities, including special districts. Opportunities for co- location and joint use should be explored with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ( PARAB) and the School District. The PARAB provides guidance and community input for the Parks and Recreation Department. As residential development proceeds in different areas of the County, opportunities for co- location and joint use should be incorporated into the planning of public facilities to serve the local communities. Mutual Use Agreements For each instance of co- location and shared use, the School Board and Local Government shall enter into a separate mutual use agreement addressing legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, facility supervision and any other issues that may arise from co- location and joint use. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 43 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 ��� � i _ �, �1 �? Ir � t, ��� �.., .� _ _�I _ I -,.... �. � � y � 4 �° i_•• �_ - i f1 • � 1 ti �° � ,, �� �, -;� 1 o ��.:. ���� i' �i ffW� School District Capital Improvements and Revenue Sources School District Capital Improvements The School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the foundation of an annual planning process that allows the School District to effectively address changing enrollment patterns, development, and growth. It is updated and adopted each year, and provides details of district -wide capital improvement needs, funding availability and a proposed schedule for addressing the improvements. Identified in the CIP are proposed projects that are needed to address existing and future projected capacity needs. The School District's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program is an expansion and reformatting of the State's required 5 -Year Work Plan. The goal of the CIP is to encourage community support and understanding, and ultimately to assure public accountability. With the passage of Senate Bill 360 in 2005, local governments are now required to annually adopt the School District's CIP into the CIE of their respective comprehensive plans. Therefore, the School District's capital improvements must be supported by a financially feasible plan, and formally adopted by the School Board each year. The CIP serves as this required financially feasible plan and demonstrates how the School District will achieve and maintain the adopted LOS for schools. Table 24 is a comprehensive summary of the School District's planned capital improvement program along with projected expenditures and revenue over the five -year planning period, as tentatively adopted by the Collier County School Board in April 2007. It provides the estimated cost of addressing the School District's capital construction program to ensure the availability of permanent classrooms for a five year projected Pre -K through 12 student enrollment. It also provides the estimated cost of addressing site acquisition, health and safety items, educational technology, equipment and ancillary facility needs, and other capital expenditures, by year, for the five -year planning period. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 45 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 N H N N N I 00 n O N LL cC d E d a O CL E S m v 0 E E 7 rn I V N d F LV O a_ 4 ^ � W E 0 CL E C� U 0 L CO A Y C v E v w v Y u ao O N O L N U � !1 O+ U � � N y >c c c DO m v n � o m m ion e � N r r � N N 0 0 0 �N rn rn a N m m o 5Q� QQN ao m 0 0 � N ^o A 0p n {may O O YS V � O A � m m m m .a' Vf ag: N yg: l O < A gad, i7 i.S iy+�S PR! 2Q5 y�� STS m r�yc u�S ir� QF m 2QQ5 aw�� 6 cS 2Q5 F� vNi LL c m 0 0 E 2 v E _ '¢$T � 2 s 31 $ c C 1` IL a= ;' r C c o a E Z w '$x�` L m un LD i2 1 .'�� A Y C v E v w v Y u ao O N O L N U � !1 O+ U � � N y >c c c DO m v n � o m m ion V Y C OJ N w v Y i OO O N o Y u j (A m U � Q d � Y � c C 0 Q u O O U c L 10 0 2 m Y 0 A � UQO §A K 8 T N O O g g QQ aL�-• 25 gg «S ga� wS g $ g Q Xi N N O fS0 6S] O8l M fD 8O 8 8M SV pN {pMy1 88M YI qq 8 8 pp �L O O c6 16 r M vi aG m �i_ RS �i N N W 16 IQ� tQ+f l'PlJ c�c � n $� SV� S 2u�u�5 2Q5 S } LL O O �7S _8 r2y5 8S of 25 rk $O� 23 gOQ S O 1\ 1� G gG QGQ 2R O g N N Iy�o H M fQQ� O fQQ M { fgQV QN QQ 5N� g� 5�� Q� QQ Q lL O O N$ �G 3 Gi $ m m Su S iiS N N M1 �8F MM 18V Ipr � 1� h fpV� 4q�1 r {f 8 8� S S 8 S E O 9 8 Op O SO 8 O O S g 16. QOg N N [V25 [G 3i 15�. lQY f`; NQD' H N f fSV� VQ' �C�p1 _ yN� gwg �rnn g� �ssd QN gN 5�� $ 25 ��Q �70�o�5, 2Q5 2QQ5 2Q5 @m@ mam $MO�f rQri_ S 4g`s 5� 5,�� 25 $�� 2Q5 $ QN 25 2Q5 qS LL N YI 2 0 A r p o C_ Q C a § & LL z8 c3 �j $ g w§ 2 d o UrS H x 7 y U 2 HS X :J ,a s N tlr5 x LL X 1 7 W H V Y C OJ N w v Y i OO O N o Y u j (A m U � Q d � Y � c C 0 Q u O O U c L 10 0 2 m Y 0 A � UQO w 7 v E Mu W LL °o o N � y U /1 O1 V = a _> c cc E c =a = j C o i m O O m L° J � � c�i, SQ 3 .4i_ g 25 25 S u3 w S o 25 2QQ5 } N ryry g v�g gg QE 5SQ� 5SQ� QQS N N f+� eel O O O O O QOQ t�l 55O�� c�S 9 r 9N 9 N N (py7 NSO tpOpO 8r p 8 M O 8 O 8� O ONE e N M W � O O O f{O�p opO SO ��Oq} rt ��O N �Ap OJ [WO I Oq [pY {+p� QoO 8O 8O 8O AO 8O O O N N Oi tV q fSV� N (J N CD N tV 5� 5� �pO,O !��- $6 g gW� 5j� � 2G n 25 o N a N O) (V S m rn m 25 25 O O W O O X N i5 aS N qR q!� �i �j $TSB QQS $2Q�5 gg y$Q� $Qla W N N Iqqw�� e�S lV tiS A M N o% N 7S A$ x S C6 S ItQSI A i3 g Q 25 e�O. a Q � 2QQ5 QQ �yXo, Q � Q 2QQ5 QQ �S u�N di c� 2S Q 25 ❑. � {� yyW' aS 7Q5 2Q5 Q'� f� yN� Q 5O� 1cl _ rom Qa !�� QS 25 y� oN� N 7 Q Z FL 0 A W V LL q qE z N o T N v LL -6 Al CL h F x L LAJ Q g ~ 5 Kas. 6 i�5 d ci c3 w 7 v E Mu W LL °o o N � y U /1 O1 V = a _> c cc E c =a = j C o i m O O m L° J � � # ##ee & \ # ##« [ �2� °� ©a #a \ # Ct co # #■# ) � ® 2 §7 m 0 � { ## ■_##k �a # #§s. «a,m & §% \ LL _ ! � 2 2 { 0 2 & # ■ % % f ° t | | - � * \ » 0 / §t - \ \ a� Ln , f2a \( \ {7d ? ) m 0u )j22� ) $ : co !ƒ uno School District Revenue Sources The School District is responsible for funding the capital needs of the public schools in the county. They utilize a variety of State and local revenue sources to provide for the capital needs of the School District. Local funding sources include millage (maximum 2 -mil local property tax), school impact fees, Certificates of Participation (COPs do not require voter approval), short term loans, and voter - approved General Obligation Bonds and sales tax revenue (usually one -half to one cent increase for specific projects). In addition to the local funding sources, the School District seeks the maximum available state funding provided through Public Education and Capital Outlay (PECO) funds and other state revenue sources such as Capital Outlay and Debt Service (CO & DS) and Class Size Reduction (CSR) appropriations. State capital outlay funding sources are derived from motor vehicle license tax revenue Capital Outlay and Debt Service (CO & DS), and gross receipts tax revenue from utilities Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) funds. In addition, the recent mandate for smaller class sizes has made additional state funding available. However, state funds represent less than 10 percent of the School District's capital needs. The School District has the legal authority to utilize up to 1.5 mils of the 2.0 capital tax to fund the debt service or Certificates of Participation (COPS) issues. It anticipates future borrowing of $168,300,000 over the next five years to provide adequate facilities for anticipated growth. Table 25 is a summary of estimated revenue sources and estimated annual revenue for the next five years. In general, funding available from state and local sources (including the issuance of long- term debt and the continuation of school impact fees) are sufficient to finance the School District's capital improvement program. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 50 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 N H N N O N I O \ O O N LL d c C Q: 9 m m E a+ h W w O m E E 7 U) 1 in N d Z m r w ^� W N� Iii E 4-0 CD W 45 0 E E c v E v w w v y li O 0 O N O y u N m U ¢ a0 i T C i c E C U C � m 0 O U�D O O S 75 m N NN N gg gg CC g 8 �VV�yy g8 g 8 p� g$ ry, iL O O S 25 m Fi3 25 3 e°i N N ^ v N chi s N �c N pppp 88 S 8 8 T pp �y 4yC�� 8 {y y 58 0 0 i'i gOg O 8 8 u] 88 8 �Ny 88 A Sy� N �p �O 8P ppO W (�� 8O O (�Ob�(�ffijj O�Y pyO �Ny G �Ny = O N N O N N$ LV g tV b O N N o pp �j W Qr o O C Cs1 Op � O 8 �t! O 1� OD QpQ QOg 5O5�� W QO yO�flyi f? yO� `@i O Xi O O O N N i5 NW 25 O �S h m N� Y 25 u) 3 c`9i_ c '8 ON Yi a��J V 8 SO S8 88 8 �O 8N 8 8 [fqy � 8 S �qp 8O 8O ?�j 8O 8O 1(pO� (OV (�V O P O 1�1pp0 f�l lY 10 LL m C C 0 � 2 m E W 5 ci ie w a c v E v w w v y li O 0 O N O y u N m U ¢ a0 i T C i c E C U C � m 0 O U�D Supporting Infrastructure Needs and School Planning Shared Costs By coordinating the planning of future schools with affected local governments, the School District can better identify the costs associated with site selection and the construction of new schools. Coordinated planning requires the School District to coordinate school planning with the representatives from various government agencies. The affected jurisdiction may coordinate with School District staff to perform its own technical review of the site. This analysis permits the School District and affected local governments to jointly determine the need for and timing of on -site and off -site improvements necessary to support each new school. The School District's projected student growth requires the School Board to obtain land for future use when it is available, at a reasonable cost. Collier County is undergoing significant infrastructure development and analyzing the infrastructure needs for planned school sites as necessary. With this process, shared funding for capital improvements for school sites can be determined according to the responsibility of each party for each specific school site. Necessary infrastructure coordination may include: potable water lines, sewer lines, drainage systems, roadways including turn lanes, traffic signalization and signage, site lighting, bus stops, and sidewalks. These improvements are to be assessed on a school -by- school basis. As the need for new schools is identified, improvements will be assessed at the earliest point in the school planning process as possible. Approval conditions can cover the timing and responsibility for construction, as well as the operation and maintenance of required on -site and off -site improvements. Any such improvements should be in keeping with the financially feasible capital plan adopted by the School Board. Other cost- effective measures should be considered by local governments during the process of formulating neighborhood plans and programs and reviewing large residential projects. During those processes, the County and the Cities can encourage developers or property owners to provide the School District with incentives to build schools in their neighborhoods. These incentives may include, but are not limited to, donation and preparation of site(s), acceptance of stormwater run -off from future school facilities into development project stormwater management systems, reservation or sale of school sites at pre - development prices, construction of new school facilities or renovation of existing school facilities, and provision of transportation alternatives. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 52 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 School District Capital Improvements Summary Florida law requires that the PSFE of a local government comprehensive plan address how the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained. The ability to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS must be based on a school district's financially feasible Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan. The School District continuously reviews its capital needs, via the District School Board of Collier County Capital Improvements Plan, on a long term basis. Furthermore, the law requires that the public school LOS standards be adopted into local government capital improvement element, and must apply to all schools of the same type (elementary, middle, and high). The District School Board of Collier County Capital Improvements Plan, as developed for the CSA as proposed, will achieve and maintain the adopted LOS in each CSA for the five year period. The School District's Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan is required to be financially feasible which will correct any existing deficiencies to attain the adopted LOS, and maximize school utilization. Capacity is added in accordance with the annually adopted financially feasible Five -Year Capital Plan. The adopted LOS standard, the level of will not be exceeded in each CSA for the five year period with the continued coordinated planning of school facilities. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 53 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 APPENDICIES Collier County Public School Facilities Element 54 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 �7f PT 1 I 1. Specific GIS SQL statements used in the identification of the five housing types can be found below. Furthermore, "School Type" = Elementary, Middle, or High can be appended to the beginning of these statements to isolate just the housing types for the Elementary, Middle, or High School students only. Please note that depending on whether the final GIS file is a shape file or a personal geo- database feature class, the double quotation marks (" ") will need to be replaced with single quotation marks ( ''), and the parenthesis (( )) will need to be replaced with brackets ([ ]). Single Family. ("USE—CODE" = 1 OR "USE—CODE" = 51 OR "USE—CODE" = 52 OR "USE—CODE" = 60 OR "USE—CODE" = 61 OR "USE—CODE" = 66 OR "USE—CODE" = 67 OR "USE—CODE" = 69 OR "USE—CODE" = 99) Multi Family: ("USE—CODE" = 3 OR "USE—CODE" = 6 OR "USE _CODE" = 7 OR "USE—CODE" =8 OR "USE—CODE" =71 OR "USE—CODE" =75 OR "USE—CODE" =79) Mobile Home: ("USE—CODE" = 2 OR "USE—CODE" = 28) Condo /Co -Op: ( "USE_CODE" = 4 OR "USE—CODE" = 5) Government: ("USE—CODE" = 83 OR "USE—CODE" = 84 OR "USE—CODE" = 85 OR "USE—CODE" = 86 OR "USE—CODE" = 87 OR "USE—CODE" = 88 OR "USE—CODE" = 90) Collier County Public School Facilities Element 55 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Im PRIM The following is a comparison of the methodologies used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report and the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study. The description presents student generation rates (SGRs) that would have been produced from the data used in this report, had the methodology in the 2006 Collier County Impact Fee Study been used. The 2006 update to the Collier County Impact Fee Study, prepared by Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc., contains a simplified version of the SGR analysis used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This simplified version is based on only three housing categories: Single Family, Multi - Family, and Mobile Homes. The Tindale- Oliver and Associates study utilized square footage for single family residences, which created three separate categories and single family residential SGRs. When those three categories of single family SGRs are averaged, the result is a Single Family SGR of 0.38. Additionally, the Tindale- Oliver study methodology resulted in a SGR for Multi - Family of 0.12, and a SGR for Mobile Homes of 0.21. The methodology in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report utilized student - specific data, current as of the October 2006 FTE count. The Florida Department of Revenue tax code (DOR Code) was assigned to each parcel in the County's database at the Collier County Property Appraiser (CCPA) Office. The DOR Code serves as the basis for determining housing type in this study. By utilizing the DOR tax code as a housing type identifier, a residence could be assigned any one of nine different housing categories (DOR Codes 1 -9 are different types of residential units). For this Data and Analysis report a total of five categories were selected: Single Family, Multi - Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums /Co- Operatives, and Government. Utilizing Geographic Information Systems, a spatial join of the data allowed each parcel's unique DOR Code in the Collier County parcel database to be appended to each student point. This further allowed each student to be classified into one of five housing unit categories: Single Family, Multi- Family, Mobile Homes, Condominiums and Co- Operatives, and Government. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 56 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 The methodology used in the Tindale- Oliver impact fee study, however, does not differentiate between multi - family units, condominiums (condominiums can be considered a multi - family residence), or government housing units. Utilizing the impact fee study's methodology, the student counts for Multi - Family, Condo /Co -Op, and Government were summed. This resulted in a "multi- family" count of 11,477 students. The process was then repeated for the number of units for those same housing types, for a result of a total of 104,655 "multi- family" units. The SGR figures that resulted from the use of this methodology on the data used in the Data and Analysis report are shown in the table below. The data used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report, when the five categories are combined down into three housing categories, results in SGRs similar to those of the Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Study (compare to Table 13: _. Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates). Most importantly, the two methodologies' results follow a similar high -low trend in their resulting SGRs, in which Single Family classifications have the highest SGRs, followed by Mobile Homes, and then Multi - Family classifications. The difference between the two methodologies is in the detail that is represented in the Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This is due to the specificity of the DOR Code, and particularly through separating out the Condo category, which has a very high number of units in relationship to the number of students. It is essentially the same methodology, but when the data is separated into greater detail, the numbers change. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 57 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 Single Family Multi- Family Mobile Homes Elementary 0.16 0.06 0.12 Middle 0.10 0.03 0.04 High 0.12 0.03 0.05 Total 0.38 0.12 0.21 The data used in this Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report, when the five categories are combined down into three housing categories, results in SGRs similar to those of the Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Study (compare to Table 13: _. Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates). Most importantly, the two methodologies' results follow a similar high -low trend in their resulting SGRs, in which Single Family classifications have the highest SGRs, followed by Mobile Homes, and then Multi - Family classifications. The difference between the two methodologies is in the detail that is represented in the Public School Facilities Element Data and Analysis Report. This is due to the specificity of the DOR Code, and particularly through separating out the Condo category, which has a very high number of units in relationship to the number of students. It is essentially the same methodology, but when the data is separated into greater detail, the numbers change. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 57 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 The following steps were used to create the boundaries of the CSAs for school concurrency (Figures 8, 9, and 10). The progression of this process is shown on the succeeding pages, using maps of CSA E5 as the example. 1) Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) boundary data obtained from Collier County GIS was used as the basis for creating the individual CSAs for each school type (elementary, middle, and high). TAZs provide a good base for defining CSAs, because they provide a geography commonly used for analytical and planning purposes, and contain population information. 2 and 3) Based on staff determinations, each individual TAZ was grouped and assigned a CSA value. The groupings were designed to closely match, but not replicate, individual school boundaries. Although individual school boundaries are based on TAZ geography, exact matches between TAZ groupings and individual school boundaries do not occur. This is primarily because a CSA may contain more than one school. Additionally, school boundaries change over time, and a match between school boundaries and TAZs in the present may not occur in the future. The grouping process was repeated separately for each school type. 4) The grouped TAZs were dissolved into a single shape, creating a single CSA based on TAZ boundaries. The individual TAZs represented in each CSA boundary, according to school type, are listed in Tables 20, 21, and 22 of this document. Collier County Public School Facilities Element 58 Data and Analysis Draft Document - August 2007 Attendance Boundary Mans Appendix 4 Collier County Public School Facilities Element 63 Data and Analysis Draft Document — August 2007 T IS S T p S RJVL 0 0,1 oz 03 04 05 IMMOKALEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONES EFFECTIVE 2007 -2008 L R]SE RYSE _ HIGHLANDS { LAKE TRAFF OR D AMON" ; : PINECREST -. a VILLAGE OAKS zx e,3¢.�� < s § T IS S T p S RJVL 0 0,1 oz 03 04 05 7 �4 6 1 �8!, s yilT Sr 1 { EMU 4 d o R� t a� x� )iyy � ri Ylfi;. y COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (I) February 23, 1999 (II) May 9, 2000 (III) November 19, 2002 (IV) September 10, 2003 (V) December 16, 2003 (VI) October 26, 2004 (VII) June 7, 2005 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99 -14 Ordinance No. 2000 -31 Ordinance No. 2002 -60 Ordinance No. 2003 -44 Ordinance No. 2003 -67 Ordinance No. 2004 -71 Ordinance No. 2005 -25 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. (VII) = Plan Amendment adopted on June 7, 2005 by Ordinance No. 2005 -25 Words underlined are added; words 644& thF9ugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted_ underline have been added; words in red and sEwelHhreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words douhle unrlerlinad are added; words 9euLQlaQiFWQ1' &l4FQwqlq are deleted, as proposed by County staff — since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) * 11. * 111. * IV * V VI. TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae INTRODUCTION CIE-1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES CIE-2 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects CIE —14 -17 Parks Projects CIE — 18 Storm -water Projects CIE — 19 Water Projects CIE — 20 Solid -waste Projects CIE — 21 Sewer Projects nL.nnl D.ninMn CIE — 22 Library Buildings Projects gig CIE — 23 EMS Projects CIE — 24 Jail Projects CIE — 25 COST AND REVENUES CIE — 26 -27 PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION CIE — 28 -29 ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Appendix A Capital Improvements Projects Appendix B Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Appendix C Collier County School Board Appendix D Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Appendix E Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Appendix F Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Appendix G Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities Adopted portions Words underlined are added; words stWk threugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted_underline have been added; words in red and sirask through are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words 9e4110 -e4weki14Fee9p are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 1. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase 'level of service" as "... an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J -5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE — 1 Words underlined are added; words stns( through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and strask-threugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words Aea4leatrael, I rFQ gp are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities and public school facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE— 2 Words underlined are added; words skask through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted—underline have been added; words in red and 6NU9ktNreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words dn„hla underlined are added; words deUWe- stwek-NKeugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q= (SxD) -I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. A. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. (II)(III)(IV)(VI) B. The County Commission will review all rezone requests, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County -Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I, and the overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request, SRA designation, conditional use petition, or FLUE amendment, that significantly impacts either: (1) a deficient roadway segment or; (2) the BEBR high range growth rate population projections through the five years of the annually updated Capital Improvement Plan, on a continuously rolling basis, and then 95% of the BEBR high range growth rate thereafter, for the variable "D ", unless one of the following simultaneously occurs: — (VI) 1. Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone or SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or FLUE amendment, to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; (II) 2. The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) — I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; (VI) 3. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone, SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. (III)(VI) C. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County -Wide population greater than 3% of the population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 3 %of the adopted LOS standard service volume of an impacted roadway, or as Generating a wmwAiW number of new public school students in excess of the adopted LOS standards for each Concurrence Service Area (CSA) for each school leve(1vpe. (VI) = Plan Amendment adopted on October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 CIE— 3 Words underlined are added; words skuskaMeugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and strusk- tgreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words douhle underlined are added; words deu4leQ4F -al, Jl;rQw9H are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/16/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) D. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: (11) (111) 2. 3. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Manager. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: a. the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and b. the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1.3: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1.1.4: Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: (III) 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, (111)2. previously approved development orders permitting new development, (111)3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and (111) 4. new development orders permitting new developments. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE— 4 Words underlined are added; words s£rask through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted - underline have been added; words in red and skask through are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words sieuple- skuek- through are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/16/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) D. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that maybe needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. Policy 1.1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: (III) Category A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, including state highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System FIHS) (III) Al Roadways: A1.1 Arterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated below on the basis of peak hour, traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport- Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette -Frank Road Goodlette -Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 Airport- Pulling Road Airport- Pulling Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road From Pine Ridge Road Airport- Pulling Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Collier Boulevard US 41 Pine Ridge Road US 41 US 41 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 To Golden Gate Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Logan Boulevard Old US 41 Golden Gate Parkway Vanderbilt Beach Road Airport- Pulling Road Airport - Pulling Road Radio Road Gulfshore Drive (III) A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour on all other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector roads. (111) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE— 5 Words underlined are added; words strask 44eugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and 6#61&tpreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words doublta underlined are added; words 6eu41e- skuekiVxeugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (1))(11)(111) A2 State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1 -75. The standards for 1 -75 are as follows: EXISTING TRANSITIONING RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA 1 -75 B C C A3 County Surface Water Management Systems: A3.1 Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74 -50 and 90 -10. A3.2 Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. (1)(IV) A4 County Potable Water Systems: A4.1 County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day (111)(IV)A4.2 City of Naples = 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area City of Everglades - 185 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area A4.3 Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. (1) A5 County Sanitary Sewer Systems: (111) A5.1 County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day (111)(IV) A5.2 City of Naples = 145 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area A5.3 Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. (11) A6 County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: A6.1 Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years CIE — 6 Words underlined are added; words sirask-HKeugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and siruek threugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words doubts underlined are added; words 9suhlg 64Fwalk !hF@wgh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) A6.2 Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. (111) A7 County Parks and Recreation Facilities: A7.1 Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000 /pop. A7.2 Community Park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000 /pop. (111) A7.3 Recreation facilities = $240.00 capital investment per capita A8 Public School Facilities Category B Public Facilities: B1 County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita (1)(11)(111) B2 County Library Collection: 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 (III) B3 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) (111) B4 County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita (1 Unit/15,000 Population) (VI) B5 County General Government Buildings: 1.9 square feet per functional resident (weighted) (VI) = Plan Amendment adopted on October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 CIE — 7 Words underlined are added; words stFuGk thFough are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant - Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and sHUek- through are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/1 a/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). (111) Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non - enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, public schools, library, emergency medical service, and jail shall be financed from current revenues and assets (pay -as- you -go financing) and Revenue Bonds approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non - enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the Schedule of Capital improvements or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. (111) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE — 8 Words underlined are added; words struGli thFeugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and struskthreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words d ❑L3 underlined are added; words Ow bla- etruek- tNredgp are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) Policy 1.2.6: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. (11) Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation, Public Schools. EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, Public Schools. EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: A. Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; B. Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; C. Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non - Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. D. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. E. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13 %. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self- imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State - shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half -cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE— 9 Words underlined are added; words skuek- through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant — Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and straektNreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words Aed41e- 646191i Vffeugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/16/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. (III) Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition. (III) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE -10 Words underlined are added; words stFusk thFaugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and struck thFaugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words douhl0 underlined are added; words ded61e -sfwQk 4hreegh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. (III) Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A,....... Beginning -with an. effective ,date -of December 1, County shall adopt, -by. ...... reference. into Its Capital Improvement - Element,- the - School- District'sannually_updated financially, feaslble.Capltal Improvement Plan, speclflcally the- "Summary of, Capital, Improvements Program " - and_ "Summaryof Estimated Revenue" Tables These tables identify the financially. feasible school facilitycapacityprojects_ necessary to.address existing deficiencies, and future-needs -based upon.achieving.and mamtalning.the.adopted LOS standard for schools.. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. C. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1.4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. (III) Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B.2) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). (VII) = Plan Amendment adopted on June 7, 2005 by Ordinance No. 2005 -25 CIE -11 Words underlined are added; words stnrck- tpreugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and stwsk-thFough are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words dfluhle underlined are added; words Aeu4laetruek- thredgh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (III) Policy 1.4.4: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans, final plats and building permits whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, or building permit shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1.5 Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. (111)(v)(v19Policy 1.4.5: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5 -year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Figure PW -1, "Collier County Water District Boundaries ", and Figure PW -2, "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas ", in the Potable Water Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, and on Figure SS -1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries ", and Figure SS -2, "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas ", in the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public School improvements will be provided as designated on the Schedule of Capital Improvements appearing in the Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a County -Wide availability basis. CIE -12 Words underlined are added; words sNUSIFNxeugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and shask ipredgh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words drJUhle undprlined are added; words deu4la- etruslcipredgh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/16/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J- 5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat or a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: (III) A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or (III) B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur, pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes. (III) Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or (III) B. At the time the final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat or building permit; or (III) C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. (III) = Plan Amendment adopted on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE -13 Words underlined are added; words stsdsk-threugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and sHu&threugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words 9eu61aeNWQk *FQw@h are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18107 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (III)(V)Policy 1.5.3: The concurrency requirement of the Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or the contract for such facilities and services has been let at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are in the first or second year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements, and the Collier County Annual Budget adopted following each AUIR at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or D. The necessary facilities and services are in the first or second year of FDOT 5 -Year Work Program at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or E. The final local development order is for a project located within a TCEA or TCMA designated pursuant to this Plan and meets the applicable requirements of Policies 5.5 through 5.8 of the Transportation Element. F. The necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding commitment with the developer to contribute fair share funding as provided for in Policy 5.9 of the Transportation Element, if applicable, or to construct the needed facilities. Policy 1.5.3a4: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final olat or building permit is issued: or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or the contract for such C. 91 "Summary of Estimated Revenue" Table from the financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, adopted by. reference each vear by December 15t.-at the time a final Public School Facilities Element, if applicable, or to construct the needed facilities. (V) = Plan Amendment on December 16, 2003 by Ordinance No. 2003 -67 CIE -14 Words underlined are added; words StFUA 111reegh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and 6trask- 111rsegh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words dpuhle underlined are added; words tleuNleetwek4hredgh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (11)(111) Policy 1.5.4.5: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and Schedule of Capital Improvements. CIE -15 Words underlined are added; words are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted unde_r_li_ne have been added; words in red and skuGEthreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words daihle underlined are added; words Eleu41e -eke are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. II Public Facilities shall be consistent with the o tnty' aoital Imorov m nt Element, D tr tart to Section 163.3177 (3)(b)1.. Florida Statutes Note: See Capital Projects under separate PDF pg. 174 through 27 CIE -16 Words underlined are added; words 6tFWGk thF9ugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted_ underline have been added; words in red and straekthreugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words douhle underlined are added; words Aedk'Q R&FaektHreugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. (III) 1. Development Order Review As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, and building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders having negative impacts on Category A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, building permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Category "A" public facilities are planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development during the next five fiscal years. (III) 2. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1.5. (111) 3. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. (111) 4. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvement Element. (111) 5. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process, owd the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections, and the County's participation, review and subsequent adoption._ by reference of the School District's financia feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. The update ................. . lly will include: Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; 4. Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the Service standards (III) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE 28 Words underlined are added; words eirusk threugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted_ underline have been added; words in red and strask- threugh are deleted, by the School District(consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words douhle underlined are added; words tlewlleekeek- thredgp are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) 6. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. Z• Upelate ei the pUbliG GGhG9I and health faeol tie6 analysiG.—The annual update to the Five -Year Capital Plan: and 78. Update of the pablis 613hool and health facilities analysis. (ill) 6. Concurrency Management System The County has established a Concurrency Management System by adoption of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The system consists of the following components: (111) A. The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this Element. The AUIR summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed projects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Category A public facilities, not including Public School Facilities, for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following the approval of the AUIR B. The review and adoption by-reference Qf Tuthe School District's annually updated Five- 8 C. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 6 to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2, aad 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 of this Element. G D. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. (111) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE 29 Words underlined are added; words stwslE thFGugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with doped. underli_n_e_ have been added; words in red and stFuGk threugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words doublfl underlined are added; words 68WIRle- 84uek4lueagh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) D E. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County -Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. 2. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. 34. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case -by -case monitoring, for the following reasons: annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. (111) 7. Second 5 -year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5 -year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5 -year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; b. Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. (III) = Plan Amendment on November 19, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 CIE 30 Words underlined are added; words stwsk thF9ugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words with dotted underline have been added; words in red and skuslEil;Feugh are deleted, by the School District/consultant - since -- distribution to the CCPC on 9/16/07 Words double underlined are added; words Eleeble -eNdek ipreugp are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adopted, October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended Ordinance No. ** October 28, 1997 Ordinance No. 1997 -56 (1) December 16, 2003 Ordinance No. 2003 -67 (11) January 25, 2007 ** *Ordinance No. 2007 -17 * ** Based on 2004 EAR, Evaluation and Appraisal Report ** This is the EAR -based amendment (1996 EAR). Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. (II) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2007 -17 on January 25, 2007 Words underlined are added; words skask- through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words tlea4leo4wak lihmwgh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) INTRODUCTION Decisions made, or policies pursued, by Collier County may influence decisions made or policies followed by: municipalities within, or adjacent to, Collier County; adjacent counties; the District School Board of Collier County; service delivery agencies; and, the various independent special districts located within, or adjacent to, Collier County. Decisions and policies of these entities may, in turn influence those of Collier County. Throughout its planning process, Collier County pursues coordination with the surrounding jurisdictions and agencies. The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, as amended, requires the inclusion of an element within local government comprehensive plans, that addresses coordination between units of government. This Intergovernmental Coordination Element is in accordance with the provisions of the Act. (II) The Collier County Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) contains a Goal, Objectives and Policies that deal with the following coordination issues: • Intergovernmental communications and level of service coordination • Coordination of land use planning strategies • Coordination of municipal annexation plans • Formal and informal coordination mechanisms (II) The Collier County Intergovernmental Service Delivery Agreement Report, completed in 2004, is an appendix to this Element. This report summarizes Collier County's interlocal agreements with governmental or quasi - governmental entities that provide services to Collier County residents. The Report summarizes service delivery agreements between Collier County and various providers, with regard to eight (8) service categories: 1) Education 2) Sanitary Sewer 3) Public Safety 4) Solid Waste 5) Drainage 6) Potable Water 7) Parks and Recreation, and 8) Transportation Facilities. (11) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words StFUSk thFGUgh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words Aawka -9 at- -sl, 41;Fn gq are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (11) As of January 2005, there are three (3) municipalities within Collier County. These are: • Everglades City • City of Marco Island • City of Naples (11) Also as of January 2005, Collier County shared borders with the following jurisdictions: • City of Bonita Springs (in Lee County) • Lee County • Hendry County • Broward County • Miami -Dade County • Monroe County (11) In addition to Federal and State agencies, the following governmental entities have jurisdiction over all, or portions, of Collier County. The District School Board of Collier County Seminole Tribe of Florida Collier County Water -Sewer District Immokalee Water and Sewer District Florida Governmental Utility Authority Port of The Islands Community Improvement District Collier County Sheriff's Office Big Corkscrew Fire and Rescue District East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District Immokalee Fire Control District Isles of Capri Fire and Rescue District North Naples Fire Control District Ochopee Fire Control District South Florida Water Management District/Big Cypress Basin Board Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Cow Slough Water Control District Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Naples /Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Various Community Development District Various Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTU) Various Municipal Service Benefit Units (MSBU) (II) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 Words underlined are added; words stsusk through are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words Aeu61a- strrIM14 ihreugh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (II) GOAL: PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND THE USE OF ANY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION MECHANISMS WITH BROWARD, MIAMI -DADE, HENDRY, LEE AND MONROE COUNTIES, CITIES OF BONITA SPRINGS, EVERGLADES, MARCO ISLAND, AND NAPLES, THE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND ANY OTHER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL AGENCY OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND UTILITY COMPANIES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, LEE COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, SPRINT /UNITED TELEPHONE, IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION (MSTU), FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY, COMCAST, AND CABLEVISION INDUSTRIES, THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY COLLIER COUNTY'S LAND, ROAD OR FACILITY PLANNING, TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBLE AND COORDINATED PLANS. (II) OBJECTIVE 1: Collier County (County) shall continue to establish and maintain intergovernmental communication and level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by the County, Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, Monroe County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, the State of Florida, and any other entity that provides a service but may not have land use authority. j (II) Policy 1.1: Collier County shall continue to utilize existing coordination mechanisms, e.g., interlocal planning agreements, joint meetings and any other mechanisms described in this Element, which promotes consistent planning activities. (II) Policy 1.2: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall be the designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments under review by the County, which have the potential to affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1. (11) Policy 1.3: The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department shall continue to prepare and review the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as an annual level of service monitoring report for the capital facilities included within the Growth Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the necessary information to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. (11) Policy 1.4: In situations where other public or private entities are providing a facility or service within Collier County for roads, water, sewer, drainage, parks, public schools, or solid waste, the County will coordinate its adopted level of service standard(s) within the parameters allowed (11) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 3 Words underlined are added; words strask- ihreugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words deu6le -ek, Q1, th eagh are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) by the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element as part of the County's Growth Management Plan. (II) OBJECTIVE 2: The County shall coordinate its land use planning strategy, including an assessment of proposed development, with that of other governmental and private entities. (II) Policy 2.1: Collier County will continue to identify, develop, and pursue areas where intergovernmental land use planning and level of service agreements are needed between the County and respective governmental or private entities. (II) Policy 2.2: Collier County shall continue to develop intergovernmental planning agreements, which shall include provisions for review and comment(s) on Collier County land use plans and capital facility plans by neighboring governmental jurisdictions, regarding any proposed activities that may have an impact on such jurisdictions or cause inconsistencies with their respective comprehensive plans. (II) Policy 2.3: Collier County shall continue to participate in cooperative planning programs with other governmental entities. (II) Policy 2.4: Collier County shall continue to undertake, where appropriate and economically feasible, joint programs with other local governments regarding the planning for, and management of, natural resources that are shared by the County and adjacent governmental jurisdictions. (II) Policy 2.5: The County shall coordinate its plans, programs, regulations and activities for the provision of affordable housing with those of adjacent governments, particularly with the City of Naples. (1)(II) Policy 2.6: The County shall continue to coordinate with T the District QGilieF GeunFy-School Board of the public school site selection for new public educational plants and ancillary plaate facilities, a!1q_and 414a PF@WiGi8R Of PR140@WlRFIY F@ and the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrence, to support existing and proposed public educational plants and anGillaity plants in accordance with the general Interlocal Agreement. adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. (II) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 4 Words underlined are added; words are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words deaHle- skdelFNxew9k are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10/18/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) (II) Policy 2.7: Collier County hereby adopts, as part of this Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Rule 291 -7, Florida Administrative Code, dated April 1994, which establishes a voluntary regional dispute process to reconcile differences on planning, growth management, and other issues among local governments, regional agencies and private interests. (II) Policy 2.8: The County shall coordinate with the South Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan. the regulatory review of residential development for school concurrence in accordance with Section 163.3180(13) Florida Statutes. (II) OBJECTIVE 3: Collier County shall develop procedures to identify and implement joint planning areas for the purposes of municipal annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure service areas. (11) Policy 3.1: Based upon Section 9J -5.015 (3)(c) 4., Florida Administrative Code, Collier County shall work with the local municipalities to identify and implement joint planning areas and /or joint infrastructure service areas for the purpose of planning for potential future municipal annexation of such areas. The identified joint planning areas and /or joint infrastructure service areas shall be depicted on the County's Future Land Use Map series. (II) Policy 3.2: Collier County shall develop procedures to plan for potential future municipal incorporation (i.e., the creation of new municipalities) within Collier County. Upon official notification that an incorporation referendum for any portion of the County has been successful, the County will initiate contact with the new municipality for the purpose of establishing an expedient and efficient transition of responsibilities, services, and /or infrastructure to the new municipality. (II) = Plan Amendment adopted on January 25, 2007 Ordinance No. 07 -17 5 Words underlined are added; words stfusk-ipreugh are deleted, as proposed by the School District staff /consultant Words double underlined are added; words dQ hlQ Qllwsk- thww9l; are deleted, as proposed by County staff (10118/07 CCPC Transmittal Hearing) I M409 gm The District School Board of Collier County 2006 -11 ■ Section 1 ■ Section 2 ® Section 3 Contents Summary Tables Table II Table I I I State COFTE Cost Data District -wide Recommendations Site -by Site Recommendations Facility Lists N d n c co E z O Q 0 W wm LL OF Z W Q to a� 0 go R' O LL R z o � b 7 r j N N b V K F N O U w v 0 O r E[ o o& .a- W � C 0 O O ly�� mp Ol ^^N N ny W O mm mp tryV O r Opt qp qN qp 0 0 p 0 O N 0 S U G b W C 0 °o, o° g g o °o $ g o °o, g g ° a, o g e4i °o $ °o S g gF QQ� 9 Q F LL f b � tJa- w o O �y W LL' = .0 $ ono $ a o 0 e a o o o 0 0 $0 g -9 m q° 3�i'i o N N O U $ 4 0� � 4 N 10 � Yj W T l0 y m yp� (o�Fz ° ° ° 0101010111 Y S LL y YI CN N R 0 m N r m r 6 N 0 N A N r m 0m � My �Vp Gq yq� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 � U W N O r 0 0 0 N_ 0 0 O 0 O QZ m F yN _ O O O m O m QQ ffi O n w O O °r 0 �i 0 0 0 °m O a O n$ O O m 0 n p 8& g O b m n gym' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O 0 0 0 O w $ LL � a = 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o g o$ 01010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 00-0-0o.. �m - $ r r 8m m °r w Lot Y � a G Wei �T.� a 6� F Y Y LL LL LL LL LL b <� s� 1M 111 p pp O W n N W_ q m W N Nq p mp 0 m♦mq qN R 9-11-8 m p Y!_ yI CI_ N m m N r m N nm m ( Op fD n Y O pN m mq 0 m N Y l7 r GW .j t7 r O! of nI [V r t`f N N I.M1 v N U W N p O Y O tV tll m 'Xj N N Y �a mU K ° a a � $ $ LL O n yy yOOy�� W { my ^ pm ey] m mm m N n m m ym O y O m yWb W m W m ^ N qp N O C O O0 O O o N O O O O O O o O O 00 O QV o N N O Y 6i - � o of �m 1 m o m o 0 Ono o .11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 2 N N N {J N N N N h rFii LL F ti m � O1 � n ui gg$ � g m$ W �q o � (° n g n t-' $ cvi m S u�i gg •- m $ o a o 0 0 0 0 a o a m o o 0 0 rei . W $ 0 0 0 0 0 o g o g o2 �o ul rb g L g' m z ai y S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a m$ P p i me o f0 0$ m A r p Ap m$ Oni O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O tp O O �p m m O N 2 ! 2© , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ,& � ■ ■ ■| . § B . . � ■§ ° �§ |f§ - # ■ m@ ;m# @ @ §| . || ° ° ®© °| | ■ | §§ � ■| � »m °2 maK |.. § � ° ° I ° °■ ■■ ■2 |f� /) § §§§ 77 § ° ��§ �,E 0E w -a ,w z w G w � ° � | K§ = �se |e � ■ § |�� § � §,� � ■ 4�� , |§ | | NO g§ R ■ || . ,■ H O� � dAap a 8.9 P. Va N � J Z Q a � ~ pW n W m N N oa m CI O o W� 1p��lD Ol a � N O O a� Y O W� MEWS W S O r r Omm O -1 LL 1q Yf fpCpC�f h�q lA lbg�A f�fa�ap�lbyyb�ly1Npp^amampp L 1� N t 1/1 li v N r woe 90 �ws > lw rc�¢ N F U D O O U N z U V r� [r 0 v 00 � dAap fam�toW�O Va � ~ N N Q m CI O tO 1p��lD Ol N (pO�f�f^p l7 O O Y O O� MEWS W S O r r Omm 1q Yf fpCpC�f h�q lA lbg�A f�fa�ap�lbyyb�ly1Npp^amampp 1� 00 O ANT ^�+1a�yDAp00 imp VN OpN W �bOpp OMNNNNtVO00 r ®NO �mmpp O f~? N 901 [NJ l p� (N r r NNNO1^ 0 A r �0�p 0 1111����0 0 llOO Y I 0 110n N t 7 llY77 O 5 1 n r O r O { t{ r tir�� W G r�pp 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 N 0 ui a G N r M U O 41alglmla O O O O O O O N C N N V 00 Q 00 800 O O (ygyO�<pEpQppp� 0000 D 0000 0 N �(0pp10 W {�p 0n 10N i f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 10 N � a F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w a � W 0 = 00 000000000000000000000g0000 Em° su z Wa o o F y Q V f � LL LL LL LL LL LL LL a i �` 0 v M O N 00 a p�q F M A A O O OJ ONO O r N '- O� m lOV O O Om m IAN I I O RIM N m O 0 tIW O m l�V100 O O 0Y N O N A s UOp IOp0 q O c0pm totNV V eWNW t0rot��i q�(� lQ �aOOpGGAS ��WY1n� y �OW loin �mp 0ON tN o Q�fN0p p 1NN 0 fYD f 0H! � N 1fp l l N � N -12 N0 N N 0 WO p�p��A �O t��p �f Y AO��OO NOOO mOAeN�OOmOtWp O Anp �t�p{ pN A o W O g A1� reOp W rcpp W N O RlY M N mnN N m Q f f EO V t0 N Op OyA N A RIGI O O m O 2000000 O O 000 o OOOOO s!g �sO�OO � OO N OOO OOO OO OO 00 00 p���Np 1tl�lf o N g^O�OOyO W�GN �V 0O �0p�� OOOO Qc�nDp OO coo OOO OOO OO OO OO OVA A OCAD f� NO W {gipp fD W �� ��p Nt0 q�O^^Q � N O N vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o 00 O O g O O O O O O 00 O O 00 G O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 000 O O am co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Q0 E T77 C5 F= QzQ F QzQ U 0 Omm am 7 uJQ1 b5�(W� SAW NY Q tWWOt �� LL LL mO O 4 lip �1I W F � O x�j9 t� 7 7 O v en � } \ § S / § \ — \ \ § / / _� !km °$ ■; °R 77 @kk /F ■ ., . °F gyp@ §4 #E 7F S �! #■§ �i�! �� @m§ § § § -- m a¥ ,aa Wag t; § § B § § §k § lu § §` | IDS )k \ § / / _� R v u G IL iuZI N Q Il U 0. N J ( I d m O a V 01 U d �O a` m U m O a` d U d 'o a (0 Q N 7 U Q 7 Q (0 Q O M W COO V r--m r�N N1�c0m r W mm r Oa W Nm, cv O co w V_NVO Wm CO m N rhW d' 74.4147VMMMMVMN a~- (MOM eNr-co 0 W C+M')M7nNm N m MNMNrm m LO �}�� --NO M 147 1-f ci C6 M MmMd-m M' (M IOwIMOMI.ItWNWM Logo Vt W OMM OOM mmm ON00 WCO CO Ch d'7 C�Wrn m V <F C6 C6 M MMMC+7 M MN 6 moo wr-v Wmr— mr, CO NNrmM W MOW W M, m mornmmvmMMWW�o m 7 C MMMMMMNMMM r Wry CO 0) r 900) NID m 7 w M M1--�OmmNN W rn w m Cl) C6 C6 C6 C6 C6 C6 C6 NMMMN LO M�mN OD)f�mMmMmCO co O W C3et rnmMmm hmN 0) Mm It �N fl. 00 W Mm N MM CO MMMNMMMMN W NCOOmOCON CO V W Mr�m r r�CONr��} W NN VrMNmr-CDC r c Mol m N MMMM o7N MMMMMN CD mOMNM IWCDNh O W W LO MNICDM W OMO W od)O N m'oDMMNMN'MNMNN �) N W W OO)M OJ Q) W f�rOmr N N a N N N N N N N M N N F, o` @ N YrN0V'COmnmm 0) m N N N N 0) N N 01 N 01 L Y-o-ovvvavvva�_0 r dm�a�amcLammmmmrLaw "m ac7c7t�t�c�c�c�c�c�c7c�c� E E rn Nr V r• LO Mmr 0) 0�t 01 W m Co P7 CEO 000MO r N r r S Wrlvm Uno 0)O rl!; O CO r CDm r Nr rd' MONO W W M �t O) ao .- f� M 7 roD tO rt0 M O N D N r r <t Wrlvm Uno CWO0 NItt O N IO O W r Cl) NM013 r O MO .r-"-s�MIt� r N wr 0m0 CMO W V, N Wrlvm Uno d NOh m N0) m It r` W C-4 N d M W N M 10c--M O V C`?NO T m r O r r st mm W00 rn - W)) M W W 0 OD r r Co nrnrn ovoto W W O m M m J a LO (D Y @ m C9a`eo E E Y m n N a CNroo Y LU O v h � N N �Eo o �n co W O <`o m T C j O O y N N $ca m U L d 01 m O � d c M @ mm t d O Z ca r C j, @ u Cc O N Q T N G Y 0 U @ N Ccp ID y L d dC 01 U'� C d � 0) @ N U W T r+ _N k L v= � o m o c � 0 o Q O y C C7 � . m Collier District 2006 Capital Outlay Outyear FTE'Forecast (2011 -12 to 2015 -16) DRAFT Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Grade 2011 -2012 2012 -2013 2013 -2014 2014 -2015 2015 -2016 I Birth Data for K 4,313 4,478 4,646 4,814 4,977 1 I PreK 398 412 427 440 454 Grade K 4,779 4,971 5,158 5,345 5,526 Grade 1 4,715 5,047 5,261 5,460 5,659 Grade 2 4,456 4,682 5,007 5,226 5,425 Grade 3 4,601 4,772 5,010 5,349 5,594 Grade 4 4,360 4,466 4,631 4,862 5,190 Grade 5 4,134 4,487 4,597 4,767 5,005 Grade 6 3,819 4,148 4,502 4,615 4,785 Grade 7 3,754 3,931 4,268 4,632 4,751 (I Grade 8 3,759 3,834 4,014 4,357 4,728 Grade 9 4,298 4,561 4,672 4,881 5,276 Grade 10 3,880 3,944 4,169 4,282 4,466 ( Grade 11 l 3,180 3,307 3,366 3,551 3,653 l Grade 12 2,624 2,950 3,067 3,122 3,294 PreK -12 52,757 55,512 58,149 60,889 63,806 Grade Level Summary PreK-5 27,443 28,837 30,091 31,449 32,853 6 -8 11,332 11,913 12,784 13,604 14,264 9-1.2 13,982 14,762 15,274 15,836 16,689 PreK 12 II 52,757 55,512 58,149 60,889 63,806 II I L.I OEF/DOE 7/31/2006 DRAFT Suncom 205 -0494 (850) 245 -0494 T N O E 0 M fD O O N d a E lu Z_ c t0 0. to N t lT O N 3 v E < c o� n m C6 E 'D 0 � Y m w 0 o c U tip W 0 m E t.. O 0 C e O O N L C � n a N � o y U Q O N N U 0 U � � N N C 0 (A V (A W �I oc N T N O E 0 M fD O O N d a E lu Z_ c t0 0. to N t lT O N 3 v E < c o� n m C6 E 'D 0 � Y m w 0 o c U tip W 0 m E t.. O 0 C e O O N L C � n a N � o y U Q O N N U 0 U � � at"nc°DM C M (A fR (A O oc O c C COD 0:0 Wu C 69 M EA 6% 4 V o � N � K m LL MfD 0<0� a y A� 6s in t 6� < W v E O 0 :w CD •V N ttf CD LL �.. a-�N y a m i9 LL J nn�n co fn `D O CO R VO U.PN� dT f9 Hi H. mt> to O C DI D) o « Q A r..LL J to C) ocDn c N N O E9 fA E9 0 Y 0 (A v d d J d f0 N (9YCpo�¢ T N O E 0 M fD O O N d a E lu Z_ c t0 0. to N t lT O N 3 v E < c o� n m C6 E 'D 0 � Y m w 0 o c U tip W 0 m E t.. O 0 C e O O N L C � n a N � o y U Q O N N U 0 U � � H C d O E W O O v d The Districtwide Recommendations 1. Correct deficiencies as identified in State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF) 1999, Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities relating to safety to life, health, and sanitation as identified in the Comprehensive Safety Inspection Report. 2. Necessary modifications for the physically disabled in existing school buildings recommended for continued use in this survey report as provided in SREF 1999. 3. Additional or replacement equipment for existing buildings recommended for continued use in this survey report as provided in SREF 1999. 4. Replacement of roofs at existing school buildings as provided in SREF, 1999. 5. Provide storage, custodial spaces, sanitation facilities to serve students, staff, and public as provided for in SREF 1999. 6. Provide paved auto parking areas as provided in SREF 1999. 7. Purchase sites for educational and ancillary facilities for future use beyond the projection period of this survey as provided SREF 1999. 8. Retrofit existing schools for technology which may include: The creation or improvement of cable ways, distribution points (closets in telephone parlance). Provide "clean power" and convenient access, video, data and voice signal wiring, the build -in equipment involved in distributing video, data and voice signals. This recommendation does not include: new construction, remodeling nor terminal equipment (work - stations, terminals, receiving equipment, etc.). 9. Provide for full- service school facilities upon approval of a full- service school grant application, or, issuance to district full- service school funds. The cost estimates for the above recommendations are not included in the section on Financing the Proposed Program 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Font Size: I Printable 7 Page Orientation: Portreit PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: THE LEARNING CENTER Address: 500 N 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 1 of 118 Lines Per Page: 15 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVFY RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Projector Work Item Area Added /Reduced Project COSUNSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or Cos ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL NOT RECOMMENDED Outlay Ciassiflcatlon FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 01-VACANT de commended Low Grade DS DS High Grade Recommended Site [Recommended 0 Site velo ment 0 commended Site rovement 0 Existing Permanent 205 Student Stations Existing Relocatable 0 Student Stations Existing Student Stations 205 Existing School Capacity 205 REMODEL 00001 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 995 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00002 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 5,044 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI EMODEL 00005 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 3,997 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI EM 00007 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 3,257 -20 0 0 0 CASTALDI http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVFY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: THE LEARNING CENTER Address: 508 N 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 2 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Lions Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ddetl etl Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. REMODEL 00009 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 6,451 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00010 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 4,714 0 0 0 D CASTALDI REMODEL 00020 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 2,985 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00018 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 5,157 -35 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00019 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 4,216 -20 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00021 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED - 6,55 -60 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00022 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 10,413 -60 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00004 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 5,128 0 0 0 0 CASTALDI - R EMODEL 00006 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 6,363 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00012 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED 4,438 -10 0 0 0 CASTALDI otal Cost p ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 0 ecommended Relocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 0 tilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 0 e Housed School IRecommended capacity 0 USE PARCEL FOR NEW ADULT District Comments EDUCATION FACILITY AS RECOMMENDED http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION B ack J 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: AVALON ELEMENTARY Address: 3300 THOMASSON DRIVE, NAPLES Page 3 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0 1. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Its Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Protect Cost ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. ( +or-) (C, Sta. x fsting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 04 - ELEMENTARY Recommended Low Grade - HI h Grade KG 05 Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 466 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 130 Existing Student Stations 596 Existing School Capacity 59 NEW FOUR INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 4,152 88 771,699 186. 8,769 NEW COVERED PE 2,254 0 209,467 93 NEW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,41 263.738 186 NEW FOUR PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 4,288 72 796,9771 1861 11,069 http: / /appprod0 1. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: AVALON ELEMENTARY Address: 3300 THOMASSON DRIVE, NAPLES Page 4 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building DescriptionlProject or Work Item Area Added/Reduced Project Cost/NSF Sts. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. NEW EXPAND ADMINISTRATION 1,014 188,464 186 0 REMODEL 00001 ADMINISTRATION FOR BETTER 4,185 0 288,900 69 0 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 2,592 -54 3,000 1 56 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 3,456 -76 4,000 1 53 RENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 14,868 0 683,928 4 0 otal Cost 3,210,173 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 626 ecommended elocatable Student 0 Stations ecommended Total tudent Stations 626 tllizatien Factor 100% ecommended FTE tudent Membership To 610 e Housed ecommended School apecity 626 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: BIG CYPRESS ELEMENTARY Address: 3250 GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD W, NAPLES Page 5 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total CosVNSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Protect ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. Waiting Facilltv Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use ode 04-ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade KG 05 - Hi h Grade Recommended Site x ansion 0 ecommended Site Deveio ment Recommended Site Improvement 0 xisting Permanent tudent Stations 962 Existing Relocatable - Student Stations 299 Isting Student Stations 1 261 Existing School Capacity 1,261 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 1,728 -33 20,000 12 606 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 12,960 -2661 6,000 0 23 Total Cost I 26,000 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 962 Recommended Relucatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 962 Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 950 Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 962 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION M-Qn-u Protect SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: CALUSA PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 4600 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD, NAPLES Page 6 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efts /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Protect Project CosUStu. wilding Description/ProJect or Work Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Total Project Cos ostINSF Ste. (Sq. Ft.) I+ or ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low Grade - PK 05 High Grade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site Development Recommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 775 xisting Relocatable 412 tudent Stations Mating Student Stations 1,187 xisting School Ca aci 1,187 NEW FOUR INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 4,152 88 771,340 186 8,765 NEW 00001 EXPAND MEDIA 1,491 0 276,991 186 0 NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 500 0 92,888 186 0 EW ONE SKILLS LAB 1,022 0 189,6631 186 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efts /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: CALUSA PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 4600 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD, NAPLES Page 7 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Stations Total Cost(NSF Sta. (Sq.Ft.) Ad Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. [+ or Cost ($) Sta. EW FIVE PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 5156 90 1,032 912 1 11,47 REMODEL- 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 15,552 -300 15,000 1 5 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 5,184 -11 50,00 10 446 ADMINISTRATIVE USE otal Cost 2428,79 ecommended Permanent 953 tudent Stations ecommended elocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 953 Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student Membership To 941 Housed ecommended School 953 apacity istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: CORKSCREW ELEMENTARY Address: 1065 C R 858, NAPLES Page 8 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.tl.us: /7778 /efis/'PSP_RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost /Stu. Building DescrlptionlProject or Work Area Stations Total Cost1NSF Sta. item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Re d Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 04 - ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade - i h Grade PK 05 ecommended Site Expansion p ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 xisting Permanent Student Stations 901 xis Relocatable Student tations 116 xistin Student Stations 1.017 xistin School Capacity 1,017 EW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 50 0 92 888 186 0 EMODEL 00004 UTILIZE TWO PRIMARY AS 1 86 8 0 0 INTERMEDIATE EMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED 5,184 -116 5,000 1 43 RELOCATABLES otal Cost 97,88 ecommended Permanent Student Stations 909 ecommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stations 909 Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student embership To Be Housed 900 ecommended School Ca acct r 90 istrict Comments http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.tl.us: /7778 /efis/'PSP_RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: ESTATES ELEMENTARY Address: 5845 EVERGLADES BOULEVARD NORTH, NAPLES Page 9 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total C Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Added /Reduced Cost/NSF Sta. (S4' Ft) ( +or -) Project Cos ($) ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Sts. Wsting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )utlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY de commended Low Grade - PK 05 h Grade Site [Recommended ansion 0 commended Site 0 velo ment commended Site rovement - 0 Existing Permanent 767 Student Stations Existing Relocatable Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 767 Existing School Capacity 767 NEW SIX PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 6.6721 1081 1.239.4851 ---- 18-61-- 11 477 NEW FOUR INTERMEDIATE 4,152 88 771,34 186 8,765 CLASSROOMS NEW EXPAND MEDIA 1,4911 0 276,9911 184 0 NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 5001 01 92,8881 1861 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Me2u Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: ESTATES ELEMENTARY Address: 5945 EVERGLADES BOULEVARD NORTH, NAPLES Page 10 of 118 Date: 30-APR-2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost /Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project ($1NSF) ($ /Stu. (� or -) Cost ($) $ta. ELIMINATE STUDENT STATIONS IN REMODEL 00005 RESOURCE ROOM AFTER 46 -10 0 0 0 ADDTION Total Cost 2,380 704 Recommended Permanent 953 tudent Stations ecommended Relocatable 0 Student Stations ecommended Total 953 Student Stations ti8zation Factor - 100% - ecommended FTE Student Membership To Be 941 Oused ecommended School - ` 953 a acit Istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE ELEMENTARY Address: 4911 20TH PLACE SW, NAPLES Page 11 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building escri tion /Pro ect or Work Item p j Area Stations AddedlReduced Total CosUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+o Project Cost ($/NSF ) ($/Stu. Sta. E.xisting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low Grade PK 05 ' Hi h Grade Recommended Site x ansion 0 ecommended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 772 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 772 Existing School Capacity 772 NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 576 01 107,007 186 NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, 5,100 0 947,363 18 0 MULTIPURPOSE & STAGE NEW TWO SKILLS LABS 2.0441 ul 379,724 1861 0 NEW TWO RESOURCE 7801 0 _W'9051 1861 01 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. sack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE ELEMENTARY Address: 4911 20TH PLACE SW, NAPLES Page 12 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 A Student Estimated Project Protect t:OSt Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. [+ or -) Cost ($) Sta. REMODEL 00001 FOOD SERVICE FOR BETTER 5 291 - 0 365,249 69 0 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00098 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 864 0 1,000 1 0 ADMINISTRATIVE USE RENOVATE 00011 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,080 0 95,680 46 otal Cost 2,040,92 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 772 Recommended elocatable Student 0 Stations ecommended Total Student Stations 772 tilizatlon Factor - 100% scommended FTE - - tudent Membership To 760 a Housed ecommended School Capacity 772 istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu_ SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE ELEMENTARY INTERMEDIATE Address: 505520TH PLACE SW, NAPLES Page 13 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Stations Total F Sta. Item 4r Ft) Added/,Reduced Project �NNSF j ($ /Stu. ( +or -) Cost ($) Sta. Wstina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 04-ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade - 0405 i h Grade e ommended Site Expansion 0 ecommended Site 0 evelo ment ecommended Site 0 Im rovement Existing Permanent Student 373 , Stations Existing Relocatable Student 0 Stations Existin Student Stations 373 Existing School Capacity 373 Total Cost 0 Recommended Permanent 373 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student 373 Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 360 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School 373 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN TERRACE ELEMENTARY Address: 2711 44TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 14 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 ht4): / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CosouZu. Building DescriptionlProject or Work Item Area gtationt Totat Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. FL) Added/Reduced Project Cost (S /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or -) (g) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade KG 05 - Hi h Grade ommended Site x ansion 0 ecommended Site evelo ment 0 Recommended Site m rovement 0 xisting Permanent - Student Stations 745 Existing Relocatable tudent Stations xisting Student Stations 745 xisting School Capacity 745 NEW EXPAND STAGE, DINING, AND 3,034 0 563,550 186 0 ADD MULTIPURPOSE EW FOUR RESOURCE ROOMS 1,560 289,814 186 0 EW ONE SKILLS LAB 1,022 898631 1861 0 EW EXPAND TOILETS AND 370 0 68,76 186 0 TEXTBOOK STORAGE ht4): / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN TERRACE ELEMENTARY Address: 2711 44TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 15 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project CostlStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Area Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or -) Cost ($) Sta. REMODEL 00002 STAGE AND DINING FOR BETTER 4,803 0 331,561 69 0 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION RENOVATE 00006 ENTIRE BUILDING 16,036 737,656 4 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,610 0 21206 46 0 [RENOVATE 1 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING. 6,11501 01 283,3601 46 0 RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 16,1001 740.6001 46 0 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 10,216 0 469,936 46 0 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,185 0 .100510 46 0 ENOVATE 00010 ENTIRE BUILDING 2 322 106,812 4 0 ENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 27,506 1,265276 46 0 ENOVATE 00002 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 6,291 0 289,386 4 0 otal Cost 5,64914 ecommended Permanent tuiient Stations 745 ecommended Relocatable tudent Stations ecommended Total 746 tudent Stations till. Factor 100° ecommended FTE Student Membershl To Be Housed 740 ecommended School 745 a acct istrlct Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN TERRACE ELEMENTARY INTERMEDIATE Address: 2965 44TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 16 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.tl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description or Work Approx' Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost /Stu. Building Item Area AddedlReduced Project Cost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.). Cost($) ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. 3ta. -Xistina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Code 04-ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade - Hi h Grade 0405 ecommended Site Ex ansion 0 ecommended Site Develo menl 0 Recommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Station 581 Existing Relocatable Student tations 0 Existing Student Stations 581 Existing School Capacity 581 EW COVERED PIE 1,83 0 170250 9 0 otal Cost 170,250 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 581 Recommended Relocatable - tudent Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stations 581 Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student embershl To Be Housed 569 ecommended School a alit 581 Istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.tl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY Address: 1101 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 17 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project Cost Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or -) ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUEDUSE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade - KG 05 High Grade ecommended Site 0 Expansion ecommended Site 0 evelo ment ecommended Site 0 Improvement Existing Permanent 466 Student Stations Existing Relocatable 306 Student Stations Extallina Student Stations 772 0sting School Capacity 772 NEW FIFTEEN INTERMEDIATE 15,330 330 2,847,940 186 8,630 CLASSROOMS NEW ONE ESE PART -TIME 990 15 183,918 18 12,261 NEW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,170 217,357 18 0 NEW ONE SKILLS LAB 1,026 0 190,60 18C)l 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Bask Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY Address: 1101 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 18 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Projector Work Item Stations Total ost/NSF Sta. (r Ft S q ) Added /Reduced Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. EW. SIX PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 5,952 168 1,105,736 186. 10,23 REMODEL 00001 104,104A. & PART OF 118 TO 1,466 -22 101,201 69 4,60 ADMINISTRATION REMODEL 00001 ADMINISTRATION FOR BETTER 2,312 0 159,602 69 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION ROOM 118, 119, 120, 120A, 1208, 121, & REMODEL 00001 PART OF 118 & 172 TO 3,400 -66 234,709 6 3,556 MULTIPURPOSE /DINING FOOD SERVICE, STAGE & REMODEL 00001 MULTIPURPOSE FOR BETTER 4,863 0 335,703 69 0 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES. 13,82 -2661 12,000 11 45 REMODEL 00001 ROOM 128 & 128A TO MEDIA 1,79 01 123.5681 691 0 REMODEL 1 00003 TOILETS FOR ADA 400 0 27,6131 69 0 REMODEL 00003 TOILETS FOR -ADA 4501 31,064 69 REMODEL 00002 TOILETS FOR ADA 400 27,6131 691 0 REMODEL 00001 TOILETS FOR ADA 1,000 0 69,032 69 0 REMODEL 00001 MEDIA FOR BETTER UTILIZATION 3,801 0 262,391 691 WITH EXPANSION 1 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 1,7213 -40 20,000 12 50 ADMINISTRATIVE USE Total Cost 7950,053 Recommended Permanent Student 831 Stations Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 831 Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 80 Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 831 District Comments IMMOKALEE PLANNING ZONE - ISOLATED http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAKE PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 129514TH AVENUE N, NAPLES Page 19 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLIRVEY_R.ECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project ClIntu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Added/Reduced Project Cos ost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) $ /NSF) ($/Stu. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low Grade - KG 05 High Grade Recommended Site 0 Expansion Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site Improvement Existing Permanent 57 Student Stations Existing Relocatable 47 Student Stations Existing Student Stations 617 Ex;stIno School Caoacltv 617 NEW EXPAND ADMINISTRATION 1 0 303,557 186 0 NEW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1 1,419 01 63.6161 L142,4901 186 NEW EXPAND MEDIA 767 0 186 0 NEW ONE ESE RESOURCE ROOM 1 520 01 96,603 18 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLIRVEY_R.ECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 • SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAKE PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 129514TH AVENUE N, NAPLES Page 20 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project CosVStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project (8 /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. REMODEL 00001. MEDIA FOR BETTER UTILIZATION 4,543 313,613 WITH EXPANSION 69 0 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 2 592 -25 2,000 1 80 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO EMODEL - 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 960 -22 10,00 10 455 ADMINISTRATIVE USE EMODEL 00001 ADMINISTRATION FOR BETTER 5,525 381,403 6 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION 0 RENOVATE 00001 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 2,073 0 95,35 8 4 0 RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,76 0 311,880 4 0 ENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,780 0 311,88 48 0 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,578 297,95 45 0 RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 61693 0 307,878 46 0 RENOVATE 00006 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,32 0 290,904 4 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,836 0 314,456 46 0 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 16,832 0 774,272 46 otal Cost 4217,89 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 570 ecommanded elocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 570 tilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 560 Be Housed Recommended School Ca acf 570 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY Address: 3500 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 21 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l, doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building DescriptionlProject or Work Item Area ddedlReduced Project Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) Cost($) ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. Sta.) Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlav Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish 04-ELEMENTARY Code PUse ecommended Low PK 06 Grade - HI h Grade ecommended Site x anslon 0 commended Site velo ment 0 ecommended Site Im rovement 0 xisting Permanent 869 tudent Stations Mating Relocatable 13 tudent Stations fisting Student 999 lotions Existing School 999 Capacity NEW REPLACE COVERED PE 3,505 01 325,72 93 0 ENCLOSE BREEZEWAYS BETWEEN NEW BUILDINGS 4,5, 8 6 TO CREATE 1,400 0 260,207 186 0 CLASSROOM STORAGE EMODEL 00002 TOILETS FOR ADA 300 0 20,70 6 0 [REMODEL 00003 TOILETS FOR ADA 300 0 20,709 69 0 http: / /appprod0l, doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Beck 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY Address: 3500 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 22 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_PECO 4/30/2007 wilding Description /Project or Work Item Approx. Student Area Stations (5q. Ft.) Added /RRf duced Estimated IF roject Total CsLNSF Project Cost ($ /NSF $ j Project Cost/Stu. Sta. Stu. Sta. REMODEL 00004 TOILETS FOR ADA 120 0 8,28 6 REMODEL 00005 TOILETS FOR ADA 132 0 911 6 EMODEL 00006 TOILETS FOR ADA 132 0 9,11 6 0 REMODEL 00007 TOILETS FOR ADA 263 18,155 6 0 EMODEL 00008 TOILETS FOR ADA 275 0 18,98 6 EMODEL 00001 TOILETS FOR ADA 18 0 12,97 8 0 EMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 6,04 -13 6,00 1 4 EMODEL 00001 EXISTING STAGE AREA FOR BETTER UTILIZATION 2,435 0 168,09 6 0 ENOVATE 00002 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 8,872 04,219 46 RENOVATE 00003 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 9,599 37,34 46 Of ENOVATE 00004 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 4,414 01 107 4 0 ENOVATE 00005 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 4,41 01,290 46 RENOVATE 00008 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 4,3 ME 00,28 4 0 ENOVATE 00007 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 16,279 66,83 4 ENOVATE 00008 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 8677 95,33 46 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_PECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY Address: 3500 LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 23 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project . Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Area Stations Total osVNSF Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Proje ct Cos ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or (g) Sta. RENOVATE 00001 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 62,464 0 2.845.936 4 0 Total Cost 6,330 41 Recommended Permanent 86 Student Stations Recommended Reloeatabie 0 tudent Stations ecommended Total Student 869 Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 869 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 869 District Comments IMMOKALEE PLANNING . ZONE - ISOLATED http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAUREL OAK ELEMENTARY Address: 7800 IMMOKALEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 24 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building scription /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total ostiNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) gddedlReduced Project Coat ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. ($) Sta. xistin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR :)utlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade - I h Grade KG 05 ecommended Site x ansion 0 ecommended Site evelo ment ecommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 748 xisting Relocatable tudent Stations 485 Isting Student Stations 1,233 xisting School Capacity 1,233 EW EXPAND MEDIA 1,886 01 350,37 186 0 EW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1,115 15 20714 18 13809 NEW FOUR PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 4,448 72 826,330 18 11,477 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE ROOM 1,040 0 193,207 186 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 1 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LAUREL OAK ELEMENTARY Address: 7800 IMMOKALEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 25 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project AA Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Be Added /Reduced Project ostfN F Sta. (grea) S Ft. (+ or Cost ($) ) ($ /Stu. St a.) NEW EXPAND ADMINISTRATION 3.191 0 592,809 186 0 NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, STAGE & 6,186 0 1,149,115 188 0 MULTIPURPOSE NEW - THREE INTERMEDIATE 3,114 66 578,505 188 8,765 CLASSROOMS NEW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2,340 C 434,715 18E 0 REMODEL 00004 MULTIPURPOSE & TOILETS TO 1923 36 132,74 6 3,687 TWO PRIMARY CLASSROOMS TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 7,976 -162 90,000 - 11 556 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 15,528 -323 8,000... 1 . 25 ROOMS 106 -1118 TO IMPROVE REMODEL 00004 UTILIZATION AND EXPAND MEDIA 3;027 -28 0 0 0 SPACES FOOD SERVICE AND STAGE FOR REMODEL 00002 BETTER UTILIZATION WITH 6,632 0 457,821 69 0 ADDITION Total Cost 5,020,764 Recommended Permanent 909 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total 909 Student Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 900 Be Housed Recommended School 90 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LELY ELEMENTARY Address: 8125 LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY, NAPLES Page 26 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodOI. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building DescriptionlProject or Work Item Area gtations Total Cost/NS Sta. ( t) Added /Reduced Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. ( +or -) Cost($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL CONDITIONALLY utlay Classification RECOMMENDED FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low pK DS rade - High Grade ecommended Site x anion 0 Recommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 922 fisting Relocatahle tudent Stations - 4 Existing Student Stations 964 xistIng School Capacity 96 EMODEL 00099 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO 172 -4 20,000 12 DISTRICT FOR OTHER USE 476 RENOVATE 00002 ENTIREBUILDING 11,020 0 502,085 44 0 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIREBUILDING 2,228 101,510 4 0 ENOVATE I 00004 ENTIREBUILDING 1 9,870 449,6891 46 0 http: / /appprodOI. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LELY ELEMENTARY Address: 8125 LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY, NAPLES Page 27 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:64 http: / /appprodOI.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Description /Project or Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. wilding Work Item Area Added /Reduced Project Cost Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or ($) ($INSF) ($IStu. Sta. RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,236 0 511926 46 RENOVATE 00006 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,449 0 202.701 46 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,353 0 198.328 46 0 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 456 0 207987 46 RENOVATE 1 00009 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,4641 of 522,3141 461 01 RENOVATE 00010 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,221 01 283,4361 461 01 RENOVATE 00011 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 3,17 01 144,7481 461 RENOVATE 00012 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,957 01 134,725 461 0 RENOVATE 00013 ENTIRE BUILDING 15527 0 707,429 46 RENOVATE 00014 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,990 D 45,333 23 RENOVATE 00001 COVERED WALKWAYS 33,644 0 766,431 23 RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,58 0 20B,762 46 Total Cost - 5,007 404 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 822 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 822 Cations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 920 Membenhi To Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 822 District Comments http: / /appprodOI.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MANATEE ELEMENTARY Address: 1880 MANATEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 28 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student E Almaled Project Project CosUSfu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total ost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft .j Added/Reduced Project Cost $ /NSF ( ) ($ /Stu. Sta. Exicdn Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR utla Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade PK 05 Hi h Grade ecommended Site ansion ecommended Site veto ment 0 Recommended Site in rovement xisting Permanent tudent Stations 764 . xisting Relocatahle tudent Stations 226 xisting Student Stations 990 x1sting School Capacity 990 EW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1.950 01 362,262 186 0 EW EXPAND TOILETS AND 579 0 107,56 186 0 TEXTBOOK STORAGE NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, STAGE 4,301 0 798,928 186 8 MULTIPURPOSE 0 EW EXPANDADMINISTRATION 2,240 0 416,137 18 0 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MANATEE ELEMENTARY Address: 1880 MANATEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 29 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area CosUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project (SINSF) ($/Stu. (+ or •) Cost st ($) ($) Sta.) NEW CUSTODIAL EQUIPMENT STORAGE 500 C 92,888 186 NEW TWO ESE RESOURCE ROOMS - 1,040 C 193,207 186 5 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 4,320 -87 40.DOO 9 460 ADMINISTRATOR TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00098 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 2,592 -4C 30,00 12 75 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 5,184 -99 6,000 1 61 ROOMS 100 -100B FOR USE AS REMODEL 00004 TWO INTERMEDIATE 1,920 44 132,541 69 3,012 CLASSROOMS REMODEL 00001 ADMINISTRATION FOR BETTER 4,099 0 282,962 6 0 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION FOOD SERVICE AND STAGE FOR REMODEL 00002 BETTER UTILIZATION WITH 6,788 0 468,59C 6 0 EXPANSION otal Cost - 2,931,07 Recommended Permanent 80 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total 80 Student Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE tudent Membership To 805 e Housed ecommended School Ca aci 80 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Eck 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NAPLES PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 68511TH AVENUE N, NAPLES Page 30 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 AArea Student Estimated Project Project CosUStu. Building DescdptianlProject or Work Item Area taions JAcIdScilitlReduced Total (Sq. Ft. eo Project Cos ($MSF) ($ /Stu. ( ) ($) Sta. istin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade KG OS -HI hGrade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site ' Development 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 74 (sting Relocatable Student Stations 309 Exlstin Student Stations 1.0561 Existing School Capacity 1,05 NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, 4145 0 770,040 18 MULTIPURPOSE & STAGE NEW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,950 362,262 - 18 0 NEW ONE ESE RESOURCE 520 96,64 18 0 EW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 639 0 118,711 1 1861 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NAPLES PARK ELEMENTARY Address: 685 11TH AVENUE N, NAPLES Page 31 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project A Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Area (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost/NSF Sta. /Stu. (+ or •) Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ Sta. NEW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 379,725 186 0 EMODEL 00098 TRANSFER RELOCATABLE TO 864 -5 10,000 12 2,000 DISTRICT FOR OTHER USE FOOD SERVICE AND STAGE FOR REMODEL 00001 BETTER UTILIZATION WITH 6,027 416,057 61 1 EXPANSION EMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 11,252 -2501 10,00 11 40 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO EMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 2,592 -54 30,000 1 556 ADMINISTRATIVE USE ENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 5,054 0 232,48 46 0 ENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 10,186 0 468,556 4 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,529 0 530,334 4 otal Cost 3,424 817 - ecommended Permanent 747 Student Stations ecommended elocatable Student 0 tations ecommended Total 747 Student Stations Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student Membership To 740 e Housed ecommended School 747 a aci istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Sack Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY G (ELEMENTARY) Address: Golden Gate Commerce, COLLIER COUNTY Page 32 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.tl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_PPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlSlu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total ostINS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost ($INSF) ($IStu. ($) Sta. ExistIno Facilltv Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classlflcatlon CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low Grade - High Grade KG 05 Recommended Site —' Ex ansion 0 Recommended Site Development 0 Recommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 0 Existing Reloeatable Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 0 Existing School Capacity EW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 33,063 576 61145,243 186 10,669 NEW CUSTODIAL 1,655 307,607 16 0 NEW MUSIC 1.270 01 236,090 184 0 NEW ART 1 346 0 250,311 188 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.tl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_PPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY G (ELEMENTARY) Address: Golden Gate Commerce, COLLIER COUNTY Page 33 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 APProx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft) Added/Reduced Project Cost ($/NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or •) ($) Ste. EW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 380,184 186 NEW PE 3,587 0 - 362626 101 EW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2,340 0 434.903 186 0 EW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1 115 15 207,373 186 13,82 EW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1.1301 101 210,1341 1861 21,013 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,0401 01 193.2901 1861 0 EW PT /OT 7251 01 134.7511 1861 0 NEW MEDIA 7,1831 01 1,335,3581 1861 0 EW ADMINISTRATION 8,2161 01 1,627,4061 1861 01 EW FOOD SERVICE 7,811 0 1,463.1271 186 NEW STAGE 2,00 0 371807 186 0 EW MULTIPURPOSE 3,00 0 557,642 18e 0 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, 1'86 0 346,403 186 STUDENT 8 PUBLIC TOILETS EW 14 INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 13,972 308 2,596,990 186 8,432 otal Cost - 17 051 24 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 90 ecommended Relocatable 0 tudent Stations ecommended Total Student 909 Stations Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student 900 embership To Be Housed ecommended School I 909 a acct itilization strict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY J (ELEMENTARY) Address: 12TH AVE - GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, COLLIER COUNTY Page 34 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CosUStu. Building scriptionlProject or Work Its Area Stations ll Total Cost/NS Sta. (S q. Ft.) AddStatio uced Projrot (S1NSF) ($/Stu. (+ or -) ($) SSt istin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Copilot SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR utle Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade - KG 05 I h Grade ecommended Site nsion 0 ecommended Site evelo ment ecommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 0 xisting Relocatable dent Stations 0 Isdn Student Stations 0 x1s6n School Ca acct 0 EW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 33,063 576 6,145,24 18 10,669 EW CUSTODIAL 1,855 0 307607 1 0 EW MUSIC 1,270 0 236,09 18 0 EW ART 1.3461 01 250,3111 186 0 http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY J (ELEMENTARY) Address: 12TH AVE • GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, COLLIER COUNTY Page 35 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SL7RV"EY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Area Stations Total Cost/NS Sta. hem (Sq. Ft) Added /Reduced Project Cos ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. ( +or -) ($) Sta. NEW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 380,184 186 0 YEW PE 3,587 0 362626 101 0 YEW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2 340 0 434!903 186 0 YEW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1 115 15 207,37 186 13,825 NEW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1,1301 101 2110.1341 1861 21,013 NEW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,0401 01 193.2901 1 NEW PT /OT 7251 01 134.7511 18 0 NEW MEDIA 7,183 0 1,33535 18 NEW ADMINISTRATION 8,216 0 1527406 18 NEW FOOD SERVICE 7818 0 145312 18 0 NEW STAGE 2,00 0 371,807 1 0 NEW MULTIPURPOSE 3,000 0 557,64 186 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, 1,864 0 346,403 18 STUDENT & PUBLIC TOILETS NEW 14 INTERMEDIATE 13,972 308 2,596,9 186 8,432 CLASSROOMS Total Cost - 17,051,245 - Recommended Permanent 909 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student 909 Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 900 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 909 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SL7RV"EY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Protect SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 Description/Project or Work Its STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY K (ELEMENTARY) Address: IMMOKALEE Sta. - Page 36 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Protect Project CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Its Area Stations Total ost/NS Sta. - (Sq. Ft.) Added/Re Project Cost ($/NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or ($) 3ta. -=Xlsting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade - PK 06 High Grade ecommended Site x ansion 0 Recommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 xlsting Permanent Student Stations 0 Existing Relocatable Student Stations - 0 x1sting Student Stations xisting School Capacity 0 NEW TWENTY -FOUR PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 23,058 432 4,488,521 195 10,390 NEW ADMINISTRATION 6,932 1,349,260 t95 0 NEW MUSIC 1 1,270 01 247,266 195 0 NEW ART 1,348 0 26215 195 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY K (ELEMENTARY) Address: IMMOKALEE Page 37 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /cfis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description /Project or Work Item APproz, Area (Sq. Area Student Stations Added /Reduced I+ or Estimated Total Project Cost ($) I Project Cost/NSF $/NSF Project Cost/Stu. Sta. $ /Stu. Sta. NEW TWO SKILLS LABS 2.0521 0 400140 195 NEW COVERED PE 2,8511 0 277,48 97 NEW PE STORAGE 3151 C 61,31 19 NEW THREE RESOURCE 1.1701 0 227745 1 EW ESE PART -TIME 1,0301 15 200,560 195 13,371 NEW ESE FULL -TIME 9501 ic 184,943 195 18,49 NEW PT /OT 72 _ 141,1291 1951 28,22 NEW ESE RESOURCE 5201 101,3641 1951 01 NEW MEDIA 6,2551 1.217,5301 195 EW FOOD SERVICE 6,811 1,325,980 1951 01 EW STAGE 1,882 366,416 1951 01 NEW MULTIPURPOSE 2,613 508,702 19 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE &TOILETS 1,62 315,95 19 NEW CUSTODIAL 1,521 297,1521 195 NEW FIFTEEN INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 14,6901 33 2,859,6041 195 B,fi6 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /cfis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION each Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY K (ELEMENTARY) Address: IMMOKALEE Page 38 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description/Project or Work Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost /Stu. Building Item Area Add uced Project Cost CostINS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or -) $ /NSF otat Cost 14,833,21 Recommended Permanent St Stations 70 Reudent commended Relocatabie tudent Stations 0 scommended Total Student tations 79 Utilimtion Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membershl To Be Housed 78 Recommended School Capacity 792 District Comments IMMOKALEE PLANNING ZONE - ISOLATED http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY L (ELEMENTARY) Address: CYPRESS CREEK, COLLIER COUNTY Page 39 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CoatlStu. Building DescriptlonlProject or Work Item Area Stations gdded bons Totat 1C0$S/NSF St a. (Sq. Ft.) ed ( +or-) Protect Cost ) (S /Stu. SSt Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR 3utlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade . i h Grade KG OS ecommended Site x ansion l ecommended Site eveio ment 0 ecommended Site rovement xisting Permanent Student Stations 0 xisting Relocatable tudent Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 0 Existing School Capacity NEW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 1 33,063 576 6,145243 186 10,669 NEW CUSTODIAL 1,65 0 307,607 186 NEW MUSIC 1,27 0 236,090 186 NEW ART 1 4 01 250,3111 1861 01 http: / /appprodOI. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY L (ELEMENTARY) Address: CYPRESS CREEK, COLLIER COUNTY Page 40 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R.PT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Building DescriptlonlProJect or Work Item APProx. Area (Sq. Ft.) Student Stations Added/Reduce ( +or -) Estimated Total Project reject Cos Cost/NSF ($) ($INSF) Project Cost/Stu. Sta. ($/Stu. Sta. EW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 380,184 186 0 EW PE 3,58 0 36282 101 0 EW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2,340 0 434,90 18 EW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1 11 15 207,373 186 13,825 EW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1.1301 10 210,134 1861 21,013 EW TWO,ESE RESOURCE 1,0401 0 193.2901 1861 01 NEW PT /OT 725111 0 134,751 18 0 EW MEDIA 7,18 1,335358 1 NEW ADMINISTRATION 8,216 0 1,527,406 16 NEW FOOD SERVICE 7818 0 1,453,127 18 EW STAGE 2,000 371807 18 NEW MULTIPURPOSE 3,0011 0 557,64 186 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, STUDENT & PUBLIC TOILETS 1864 0 346,403 18 d8,432 NEW 14 INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 13,97; 308 2,596,99 18 otal Cost 17,051,24 Recommended Permanent tudent Stations 909 Recommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 Recommended Total Student Stations 909 Utilization Factor - - 1000 ecommended FTE Student Membershi To Be Housed 90 Recommended School apacity 90 istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R.PT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY M (ELEMENTARY) Address: NE OFUS HWY 41 8 S OF RATTLESNAKE, COLLIER COUNTY Page 41 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http:// appprod0l .doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations AddedlReduced Total CosUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) Project Cost (g) ($ /NSF ) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY ode Recommended Low Grade - KG 05 HI h Grade Recommended Site Ex ansion *commended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Im rovement 0 feting Permanent tudent Stations 0 fisting Relocatable Student Stations 0 [sting Student Stations p xisting School Capacity 0 NEW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 33,063 576 6,145,243 186 10,669 EW CUSTODIAL 1,655 0 307,607 186 0 NEW MUSIC 1,270 0 236 09 186 0 NEW I ART I 1,34tj 0 250.3111 186 http:// appprod0l .doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY M (ELEMENTARY) Address: NE OFUS HWY 41 & S OF RATTLESNAKE, COLLIER COUNTY Page 42 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Description/Project or Work Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Item Area Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost /NS) Sta. (Sq. ( +or -) ($ (g) (SINSFj (Sta. Sta. tW TWO SKILLS LABS 2044 0 380,184 186 0 EW PE 3,587 0 362.626 101 EW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2 340 0 434.903 186 0 EW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1,115 15 207 373 186 13 825 Ew ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1,1301 101 210,1341 1861 21,013 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,040 01 193.2901 lea 0 EW PT /OT 725 01 134,751 1 0 EW MEDIA 7,183 0 1,335,354 1861 0 EW ADMINISTRATION 821 0 1,527,4061 1861 0 EW FOOD SERVICE 7818 0 1,453,127 18el 0 EW STAGE 2000 0 371,807 18 0 EW MULTIPURPOSE 3000 0 557,64 18 0 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, 1,864 0 346,40 18 0 STUDENT & PUBLIC TOILETS NEW 141NTERMEDIATE 13,972 308 2,596,990 1 8,432 CLASSROOMS Total Cost 1 17,051,24 Recommended Permanent 909 Student Stations Recommended Reloc9table 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student 909 Cations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 900 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School 909 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION sack Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Item SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY O (ELEMENTARY) Address: SOUTH NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY Page 43 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Buildin Description /Project or Work Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. g Item (Sq. Ft) Added/oeduced Project Cost Sta. ($ NSF ( ) ($) ) ($/Stu. Existin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Sta. Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR utla Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Code 04 - ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade - I h Grede KG 05 Recommended Site x anslon Acquire site 10,060,00 ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 0 Existing Relocatable tudent Stations 0 xlstin Student Stations 0 Existing School Ca aci 0 NEW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 33,063 576 6,145,243 186 10,66 NEW CUSTODIAL 1655 0 307,607 186 0 NEW MUSIC 1,270 23609 1 0 NEW ART 1,346 250311 186. 0 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY O (ELEMENTARY) Address: SOUTH NAPLES, COLLIER COUNTY Page 44 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost /Stu. Building Description /Project or Work - Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Total Project Cost Cost/NS Sta. (Sq.FL) (+ or ($) ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. EW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 380,184 186 0 EW PE 3587 0 362,626 101 EW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2 340 0 434.903 186 0 NEW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1,115 15 207,373 186 13 825 EW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1,13 10 210,13 18 21,013 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,040 193,290 18 0 EW PT /OT 725 134,751 18 0 EW MEDIA 7,18 0 1,33535 18 0 EW ADMINISTRATION 8,216 0 1,527,406 18 0 EW FOOD SERVICE 7,818 0 1,453,127 186 0 EW STAGE 200 0 371,80 186 0 EW MULTIPURPOSE 300 0 557,64 186 0 EW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, 1,86 0 346,40 186 0 STUDENT & PUBLIC TOILETS NEW 141NTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 13,972 306 2,596,99 186 8,432 otal Cost 27,111 245 *commended Permanent Student Stations 909 'commended Relocatable tudent Stations O Recommended Total Student Cations 909 Utilization Factor 1000/. Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed 9017 Recommended School Capacity 90 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION eack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY Q (ELEMENTARY) Address: CORKSCREW AREA, COLLIER COUNTY Page 45 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodOI.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project roject Cost/Stu. wilding ascription /Projector Work Item Stations Total Area Added/Reduced osU NS Sta. JC(P Project Cost (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) ($) $INSF) ($IStu. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Sta. Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04- ELEMENTARY ode eeommended Low Grade - 1 h Gra d KG 05 Site x ansion 0 ecommended Site eveto ment 0 ecommanded Site m rovement xisting Permanent Student Stations 0 Existing Relocatabie tudent Stations - 0 xistin Student Stations g xistin School Ca acit 0 EW 32 PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 33,063 576 6,145,24 1l 8 6 10,869 EW CUSTODIAL 1,655 0 307,607 18 EW MUSIC 1,270 0 236,090 18q 0 NEW ART 1 1,346 250,311 1861 01 http: / /appprodOI.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION �Fenu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006-2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY Q (ELEMENTARY) Address: CORKSCREW AREA, COLLIER COUNTY Page 46 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work a Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. Item (SABr Added/Reduced Project Cos ( NSF ) (S /Stu. ( +or•) (gJ Sta. NEW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 380,184 186 0 EW PE 3,587 0 382,626 101 EW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2,340 0 434,903 188 0 NEW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1,115 15 207.373 Ise 13825 NEW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1,130 10 210,13 18 21,013 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,04 0 193 2 18 0 EW PT /OT 72 0 134,751 186 0 EW MEDIA 7,183 133535 18 0 EW ADMINISTRATION 8,216 0 1,527,4 18 0 EW FOOD SERVICE 781 1,453127 186 0 EW STAGE 200 0 371807 18 0 EW MULTIPURPOSE 300 0 557,64 186 0 EW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, 1,864 0 346,403 186 0 STUDENT & PUBLIC TOILETS EW 14 13,97 30 2,596,990 186 8,432 CLASSROOMS CLASSROOMS otal Cost 17,051,245 ecommended Permanent 909 tudent Stations ecommended Relowtable 0 Student Stations ecommended Total Student 909 Stations tilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student 89 embershi To Be Housed ecommended School 90 a acct Istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: OSCEOLA ELEMENTARY Address: 5770 OSCEOLA TRAIL, NAPLES Page 47 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 ht4):Happprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description/Project or Work Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Cost/Stu. Sulldin hem Area JAdded/F ProJeet ost/NS [,]Project Sta. (Sq. FL) or -) Cost($) $/NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. xisting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lasaiflcation FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Code 04 - ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade • 1 It Grade PK 05 ecommended Site Ex anion p ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 xisting Permanent Student tations 75 fisting Relocatable Student tations 58 x1sting Student Stations I 811 Existing School Capacity 811 EW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 50 0 92,888 18E 0 EMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED 5,184 -58 5,OOC 1 8 RELOCATABLES otat Cost 97,888 Recommended Permanent tudent Stations 753 ecommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 ecommended Total Student tations 75 tillzation Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student ambershi Be To Housed 741 ecommended School apacity 753 District Comments ht4):Happprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PELICAN MARSH ELEMENTARY Address: 9460 AIRPORT ROAD N, NAPLES Page 48 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efiOPSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area AddedlReducad Project Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (4- or -) Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. =Xistina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR :)utlav Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low PK 05 rade - High Grade Recommended -Site 0 Expansion Recommended She 0 Develo ment Recommended Site 0 m rovement xisting Permanent 974 tudent Stations xisting Relocatable 44 tudent Stations Existina Student Stations 1,018 Existing School CaDaCItV 1,01 REMODEL 00003 REMODEL ROOM 03 -103 TO 1,00 -22 69,564 69 3,16 COMPUTERISCIENCE SKILLS TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 864 -22 0 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLE 86 -22 1,000 1 4 otal Cost 70,584 Recommended Permanent Student 95 - Stations Recommended elocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total 952 Student Stations Utilization Factor - 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 950 Be Housed Recommended School 952 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efiOPSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION B ack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PINECREST ELEMENTARY Address: 313 S 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 49 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Atldetation Total CostMSF Sta. (S9. Ft.) eed Protect Cost ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )utlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade - PK 06 Hi h Grade ecommended Site ansion Recommended Site Develo mant Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 69 Existing Relocatable tuden Stations 116 istin Student Stations 806 xistin School Ca acit 806 EW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,419 0 263 738 186 EW EXPAND MEDIA 775 0 144,043 186 NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 1,025 0 190,50 1861 0 NEW TEN INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 91820 220 1,825,167 186 8,2 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PINECREST ELEMENTARY Address: 313 S 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 50 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: /Jappprod0l.doe.state.tl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Bulidin Description/Project or Work Item Area Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project ostINS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) [+ or Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. NEW MUSIC 1,270 0 236220 186 0 NEW EXPAND ADMINISTRATION 5,403 0 1,004,213 186 0 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE, PUBLIC & STUDENT 939 0 174,525 186 0 TOILETS NEW I DINING, STAGE, & MULTIPURPOSE 10,5811 01 1,966.608 1861 0 UTILIZE ROOMS 102, 108, 109, 116, 117, 118, 129, REMODEL 00006 132, & 134 AS PRIMARY CLASSROOMS, AND 107 10,84 -10 0 0 0 AS SKILLS LAB EMODEL 00009 1 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED CASTALDI 7,36 -108 0 0 0 REMODEL 00006 1 TOILETS FOR ADA 1,300 0 89,741 69 0 EMODEL 00004 PORTION OF BUILDING TO ACCOMODATE 1100 0 69,032 69 0 EXPANSION AND FOR ADA TOILETS REMODEL 00007 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED CASTALDI 2,451 0 0 0 0 REMODEL 00001 FOR UTILIZATION AS 1 PART -TIME ESE, ONE 2,792 25 192,737 69 7,709 FULL -TIME ESE, AND ONE ESE RESOURCE REMODEL 00099 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO DISTRICT FOR 4,321 -9 50pOOO 12 532 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLE 86 -221 1,000 1 4 REMODEL 00002 DEMOLISH STAGE & DINING PER APPROVED 2,814 0 0 0 CASTALDI REMODEL 00005 ROOM 102 TO SKILLS LAB 1,35 -32 93,608 6 3,120 REMODE 00003 DEMOLISH PER APPROVED CASTALDI 4,83 0 0 http: /Jappprod0l.doe.state.tl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PINECREST ELEMENTARY Address: 313 S 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 51 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state,fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Buildin Description /Project or Work A Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost/stu. Item Area Area (Sq. Ft) AddedlRoeduced Project Cost ($/NSF ) Sta. ($/Stu. ( ) ($) ENOVATE 00006 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 31 83 1,450,442 461 Sta. 0 otai Cost 7 751,583 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 787 ecommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stat, a 787 Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed 765 Recommended. School. Capacity 787 District Comments IMMOKALEE PLANNING ZONE - ISOLATED http: / /appprod0l.doe.state,fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION-1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: POINCIANA ELEMENTARY Address: 2825 AIRPORT ROAD, NAPLES Page 52 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. wilding eecriptionlProJect or Work Item Area gtatlons Total osUNSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project Cost ($IStu. ( +or Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )utley Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade - 1 h Grade PK 05 Recommended Site Ex ansion - 0 ecommended Site Develo ment 0 commended Site in rovement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 834 xlsting Relocatahle tudent Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 834 Existing School Ca acl - 834 EW ONE SKILLS LAB 1,022 0 189,863 186 0 NEW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1 95 0 362,262 1861 0 EW EXPAND ADMINISTRATION 1,015 0 188,562 1861 0 NEW COVERED PE & STORAGE 1 3,12 0 319,8681 102 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION MFLu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: POINCIANA ELEMENTARY Address: 2825 AIRPORT ROAD, NAPLES Page 53 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_R.PT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Stations Total CosUNSF Sta. (Sqr Ft Added/Reduced Protect ($INSF) ($ /Stu. I+ or Cost J$) Sta. EM TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,040 0 193 207 18 0 YEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 639 0 118,711 186 0 ELY EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, STAGE 8 4,776 MULTIPURPOSE 0 887,171 186 0 EW EXPAND MEDIA 1,20 0 224,045 186 0 FOOD SERVICE 8 STAGE FOR REMODEL 00001 BETTER UTILIZATION WITH 6,389 0 441,046 69 0 EXPANSION REMODEL ADMINISTRATION FOR REMODEL 00001 BETTER UTILIZATION WITH 3,759 0 259,492 69 0 EXPANSION RENOVATE 00006 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,123 51,658 46 0 RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,05 94,300 4 0 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 906 0 416,898 46 0 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 7,531 0 346,42 46 0 RENOVATE '00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 8,854 0 407,284 4 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIREBUILDING 2,011 0 92000 46 otal Cost 4,592,7 ecommended Permanent Student Stations 834 Recommended Relocatable Student 0 s ended Total t Stations 834 on Factor 1007 ended FTE t Membership To ERecommendedSchoof 812 sed ended School Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_R.PT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: SABAL PALM ELEMENTARY Address: 409518TH AVENUE NORTHEAST, NAPLES Page 54 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Pro ject cost/Stu. Buildin 9 escri tion /Pro ect or Work Item P j Area Stations Added /Reduced Total cost/NSF Sts. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or -) Project Cost Ilq (S /NSF) St ($/Stu. SSt Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR 3utlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use ode 04 - ELEMENTARY ecommended Low Grade - KG OS f h Grade Recommended Site x anion 0 commended Site velo ment ecommended Site m rovement 0 xisting Permanent Student Stations 758 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 314 Existing Student Stations 1,072 Existing School Capacity 1,072 NEW FOUR INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 4,152 88 771,340 186 8,765 NEW SIX PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 6,672 108 1,239,495 186 11,477 NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 500 0 92,8661 166 0 NEW EXPAND MEDIA 1,577 0 —292,9681 1861 0 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION sack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: SABAL PALM ELEMENTARY Address: 409518TH AVENUE NORTHEAST, NAPLES Page 55 of 118 Date: 3D- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description/Project or Approx' Student Stations Estimated Total - Project Project CosUStu. Work Item Area Added/Reduced Protect Cost CosVNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or (b) ($INSF ) ($/Stu. Sta. Sta. ) REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 15,652 -314 15,000 1 4 otai Cost 2 411 691 Recommended Permanent dent Stations 954 ommended Relocatable dent Stations 0 ommended Total Student tlons [Rommended 954 izatlon Factor 100% ommended FTE Student mbershl To Be Housed 832 - School Capacity 954 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: SEA GATE ELEMENTARY Address: 650 SEA GATE DRIVE, NAPLES Page 56 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl .us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Protect CostlStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Lions Total Cost1NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or -) Protect Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outla y Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fisb Use 04-ELEMENTARY a mmended Low Grade - Grade KG 05 mmended Site �- nslon - 0 mmended Site lo ment 0 mmended Site ovemant 0 ting Permanent ent Stations PN 922 ing Relocatable ent Stations 106 ln Student Stations 1,028 Existing School Capacity 1,028 NINE PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 10,008 162 1 859,242 186 11,477 TWO INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 2,076 44 385,670 186 8,765 TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 0 379,725 18 0 PE STORAGE 315 0 58 ,546 18 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl .us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: SEA GATE ELEMENTARY Address: 650 SEA GATE DRIVE, NAPLES Page 57 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodO1.doe.state,fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 wilding DeseriptlonlProJeet or Work Item AAreax. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project CosVStu. (9 Ff Added/Reduced Project Cost/NS ($INSF) Sta. (S /Stu. (+ or -) Cost ($) EW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,95 0 362.262 18 Sta. EW ONE ESE PART -TIME 17 15 207,140 18 13,80 EW TWO ESE RESOURCE 1,04 0 193,207 18 EW EXPAND MEDIA 3,40E 0 633,309 18 EW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, STAGE, 8 MULTIPURPOSE 4,583 0 851,143 18 0 NEW EXPAND TOILETS & TEXTBOOK STORAGE 441 p 81,92 188 0 EW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 40: 1 74,86 1B 0 NEW MUSIC 1,270 235,935 186 p REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 4,320 -70 300 1 43 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 1,728 -36 20,000 12 556 ADMINISTRATIVE USE REMODEL. FOOD SERVICE AND REMODEL 00001 MEDIA FOR BETTER UTILIZATION 8,001 0 552,326 6S 0 WITH EXPANSION otal Cost 6,898,30( Recommended Permanent Student 1,143 Stations Recommended Relocatable Student p Stations Recommended Total tudent Stations 1,143 Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 1,121 Be Housed Recommended School Ca acIty 1,143 District Comments http: / /appprodO1.doe.state,fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Appee 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: SHADOWLAWN ELEMENTARY Address: 2161 SHADOWLAWN DRIVE, NAPLES Page 58 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R-PT_SLTRV Y RECO 4/30/2007 Appee Student Estimated Project Protect Cost/stu. Building Description/Project or Work Its Area Stations Total osUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft) AddedlRedueed Project Cost ($ /Stu. Sta. Existin Fecill Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR :)Utley Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY ode ecommended Low Grade - i h Grade PK 05 ecommended Site pension 0 ecommended Site evelo ment ecommended Site m rovement Existing Permanent Student Stations 657 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 43 ' xisting Student Stations 700 Existing School Capacity 700 EW COVERED PE 2.997 0 278,385 93 D EW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1.95 0 362,262 186 0 EW ONE FULL -TIME ESE 1,13 10 209 926 188 20,993 NEW ONE ESE RESOURCE 520 0 96,60 186 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R-PT_SLTRV Y RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back AA rox. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: TOMMIE BARFIELD ELEMENTARY Address: 101 KIRKWOOD STREET, MARCO ISLAND Page 60 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 AA rox. Student Estimated Project Protect CostlStu. Building Description/Project or Work Ite rea Area Stations Total F .S Sta. (S AddedlReduced Project Cost NBF ) ($ /Stu. ( +or Sta. xistin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04-ELEMENTARY Code Recommended Low Grade - PK 05 HI h Grade ecommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 600 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 65 Existing Student Stations 665 Existing School Capacity 6651 1 NEW TWO PRIMARY CLASSROOMS 2,224 36 413,165 18 11,477 EW FIVE INTERMEDIATE 5,190 110 964,175 186 8,765 CLASSROOMS EW TWO SKILLS LABS 2,044 379,7251 1861 0 NEW ONE ESE PART -TIME 1 1,115 15 7n7,1 AOM 186 13,809 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: TOMMIE BARFIELD ELEMENTARY Address: 101 KIRKWOOD STREET, MARCO ISLAND Page 61 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project AArea Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area S Ft. Added /Reduced Project Cost/NSF F Sta. /Stu. (Q (+ or Cost ($) J ($ Sta. NEW ONE ESE FULL -TIME 1,130 10 209926 186 2099 NEW EXPAND MEDIA 696 0 166,45 18 NEW ONE ESE RESOURCE ROOM 520 0 96,6D3 186 0 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 1,728 -33 2,000 1 61 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 1,728 -32 20,000 12 625 ADMINISTRATIVE USE otal Cost 2459189 Recommended Permanent 771 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total 771 Student Stations Utilization Factor 100° Recommended FTE Student Membership To 75 Be Housed Recommended School 771 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VETERANS MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY Address: 15960 VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD, NAPLES Page 62 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. wilding Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total °SUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ddedlReduced Project ($INSF) ($/Stu. (+ or -) Cost ($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )utlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use de 04-ELEMENTARY commended Low PK 05 ade -High Grade commended Site ansion [Recommended 0 commended Site velo ment 0 Site improvement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 786 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 786 Existing School Capacity 786 ELIMINATE STUDENT STATIONS IN REMODEL 00003 FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS ONCE 2,325 -50 0 C 0 COFTE IS ASSIGNED Total Cost 0 Recommended Permanent Student 736 Stations Recommended Relocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total Student Stations 736 Utilization Factor 100%, ecommended FTE Student Membership To 720 Be Housed Recommended School Ca act 73 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VILLAGE OAKS Address: 1501 STATE ROAD 29, IMMOKALEE Page 63 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimatetl Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Total Project Cos ost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) l$) I$ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. ExIstina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY e ommended Low Grade PK 06 h Grade ommended Site 0 anion ommended Site ["listing elo ment ommentlad Site rovement Permanent 89 tudent Stations xisting Reiocatable Student Stations Existina Student Station 69 Existing School Capacity. 69 NEW ADMINISTRATION 6,95f 1,293,229 16 NEW COVERED PE 8 STORAGE 3,14f 326,467 104 NEW ONE SKILLS LAB 1,022 190,092 186 0 NEW Expand kitchen to include staff 400 74,400 18 dining and cooler /freezer http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION enu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VILLAGE OAKS Address: 1501 STATE ROAD 29, IMMOKALEE Page 64 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Building DescriptionlProject or Work Item Approx. Area (Sq. Ft.) Student ed/ Stations Added/Reduced Estimated Total Project Cost Protect Cost/NSF (SMSF) Project J COata. Sta. ($/Stu. Sta. NEW FIVE INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS 5,190 lic 964 175 18 8,78 REMODEL 00008 TOILETS FOR ADA, AND CREATE PLANNING AREA 464 C 32,030 6E 0 REMODEL 00009 TOILETS FOR ADA, AARNEDACREATE PLANNING 232 0 16,015 6E 0 REMODEL 00005 1 UTILIZE ROOM 4 AS PRIMARY CLASSROOM 1.0761 181 01 01 0 EMODEL 00006 UTILIZE ROOM 7 AS RESOURCE, ROOM 4 AS PRIMARY 1,731 -7 0 0 0 REMODEL 00007 1 UTILIZE ROOMS B 9, 10, & 11 AS PRIMARY 4.282 -161 01 01 0 REMODEL 00009 UTILIZE ROOMS 17, 19 & 20 AS PRIMARY 3,222 121 of 0 EMODEL 00008 UTILIZE ROOMS 13 & 14 AS PRIMARY 2,143 01 01 0 REMODEL 00011 TOILETS FOR ADA & CREATE PLANNING 464 01 32.0301 691 0 REMODEL 00006 TOILETS FOR ADA & CREATE PLANNING 232 01 16,0151 691 D REMODEL 00010 TOILETS FOR ADA & CREATE PLANNING 232 0 16,015 691 0 REMODEL 00007. TOILETS FOR ADA, AND CREATE PLANNING AREA 232 0 16,015 69 0 REMODE 00005 TOILETS FOR ADA, AND CREATE PLANNING AREA 232 0 16,015 69 EMODE 00004 TO MEDIA, MUSIC AND SKILLS LAB 9,712 -15 670,44 6 44,696 REMODE 00003 1 TO MUSIC 2.163 0 149,316 691 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VILLAGE OAKS Address: 1501 STATE ROAD 29, IMMOKALEE Page 65 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CosVStu. Building Descrlption/Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or •) Cost ($) ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. Sta. REMODEL 00002 TO FOOD SERVICE, STAGE, AND 10,800 0 746,099 69 0 MULTIPURPOSE TO ONE ESE PART -TIME, ONE REMODEL 00001 FULL -TIME, & TWO REGULAR 4,483 25 309,471 69 12,379 RESOURCE Total Cost 4,867,82 Recommended Permanent 811 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total 811 Student Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be 789 Housed ecommended School EIMMOKALEE 811 Capacity LA ZONE - District Comments ED LATED http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VINEYARDS ELEMENTARY Address: 6225 ARBOR BOULEVARD W, NAPLES Page 66 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 ht4):Happprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 AArea Student Estimated Project Project cz,19stu. Buildin DescriptlonlProJect or Work Item Area Stations Total Sj Sta (Sq. Ft.) AddedlRRf duced roject Cost (ost1N ) ($ /Stu. ( ) ($) Sta. Existing Facility, Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )utlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 04 - ELEMENTARY Code ecommended Low Grade PK 05 High Grade Recommended Site Ex ansion 0 Recommended Site Develo ment C Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent tudent Stations 959 Existing- Relocatable Student Stations 221 Existing Student Stations 1,180 Existing School Capacity 1,180 NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE, STAGE 5,911 0 1,098,027 186 0 & MULTIPURPOSE NEW EXPAND MEDIA 1,611 0 299,284 186 0 NEW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,950 0 362,262 186 0 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED 8,640 -149 11,000 1 74 RELOCATABLES ht4):Happprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VINEYARDS ELEMENTARY Address: 6225 ARBOR BOULEVARD W, NAPLES Page 67 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description /Project or Work Item Approx. Area (Sq. FL) Student ns Stations Ad Statioduced (d /Red Estimated Total Project l ($) Project ostINSF ($INSF) Project Cost /Stu. Sta. ($IStu. Sta. REMODEL 00002 FOOD SERVICE AND STAGE FOR BETTER UTILIZATION WITH ADDITION 6,907 0 476,805 69 0 REMODEL 00004 MEDIA FOR BETTER UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION 5,572 0 384,647 69 0 REMODEL 00005 UTILIZE FOUR PRIMARY CLASSROOMS AS INTERMEDIATE 4,00 -1 0 0 REMODEL 00099 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO DISTRICT FOR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE USE 3147 -72 4,00 1 56 RENOVATE 00009 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,3741 0 523,204 46 ENOVATE 00010 ENTIRE BUILDING 6,0351 0 27761 46 0 RENOVATE 00011 ENTIRE BUILDING 3,2831 0 151.0181 46 3 RENOVATE 00012 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 3,0261 0 139.1961 46 0 RENOVATE 00013 ENTIRE BUILDING 15,7831 0 726,0181 46 0 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,5121 0 20755 46 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,4781 0 205.9881 46 0 RENOVATE 00006 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,44 204,47 4 RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,421 0 525,36 46 0 RENOVATE 00004 REMAINDER OF BUILDING 4,41 0 202,954 461 0 RENOVATE 00014 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,0241 0 93,1041 461 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: VINEYARDS ELEMENTARY Address: 6225 ARBOR BOULEVARD W, NAPLES Page 68 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_ SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 DescdptionlProject or Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project CostlStu. Building Work Item Area Added /Reduced Project Cost Cost(NSF Sta. • (Sq.Ft.) I+ or (g) (S /NSF) (3 /Stu. Sta.) RENOVATE 00002 REMAINDER OF 3,96E 0 182,436 46 0 BUILDING RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 34,264 0 1,576,144 46 0 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 1261 C 104,006 46 0 otal Cost 7,755,08 Recommended Permanent tudent Stations 943 Recommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 Recommended Total Student Stations 943 Utilization Factor ecommended FTE Student Membershl To Be Housed 931 Recommended School Capacity 94 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_ SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION ' PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION sack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: CORKSCREW MIDDLE Address: 1165 C R 858, NAPLES Page 69 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 - Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Protect Cost CostINS . Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or •) ($) ($INSF) ($IStu. Ste. Exisilina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 05 - MIDDLE Code Recommended Low Grade - 0608 HI h Grade Recommended Site 0 anion Recommended Site Development Recommended Site 0 Im rovement Existing Permanent 1,186 Student Stations Existing Relocatable, P72 Student Stations Existina Student Stations 1,45 Exilstina School Capacity 1,312 NEW EXPAND PE 2,265 0 397.850 176 0 NEW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,170 0 263,6671 225 0 REMODEL 00003 PE STUDENT STATION 6,007 -4 0 0 ADJUSTMENT REMODEL 00006 BAND STUDENT STATION 1994 -5 0 0 ADJUSTMENT http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: CORKSCREW MIDDLE Address: 1165 C R 655, NAPLES Page 70 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description /Project or Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost/Stu. . Building Work Item Area Added/Reduced Project Cost Cost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 12,096 -272 12,000 1 44 Total Cost 673,417 Recommended Permanent tudent Stations 1141 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student Staid 1,141 Utilization Factor 90% Recommended FTE Student Membershi To Be Housed 1,005 Recommended School Capacity 1,02 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: EAST NAPLES MIDDLE Address: 4100 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES Page 71 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Coststu. wilding Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project Cosl ost/NSF Sta. 1 . (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) ($) ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta.) ExIstinn Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR outlav Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 05 - MIDDLE Code Recommended Low Grade - 0608 I h Grade Recommended Site 0 Expansion Recommended Site 0 evelo ment ecommended Site 0 m rovement Existing Permanent 1,134 Student Stations Existing Relocatabie 132 Student Stations Existing Student Stations 1,266 E isting School Capacity 1,139 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED 5,184 -132 6,000 1 45 RELOCATABLES REMODEL 00002 PE STUDENT STATION 6,793 -40 0 0 ADJUSTMENT REMODEL 00001 BAND STUDENT STATION 187 -5 0 ADJUSTMENT RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 132,31 0 7,012,801 5 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: EAST NAPLES MIDDLE Address: 4100 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES Page 72 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Description /Project or Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Work item Area (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost Cost/NSF Sta. (+ or ($) ($INSF) ($/Stu. Sta. ENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 9.56S 507157 53 otal Cost 7,525,958 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 1,089 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 Recommended Total Student Stations 1,089 Utilization Factor 90q Recommended FTE Student i To Be Housed 958 W,mb., nded School Ca acit d 980 mments I http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved Districtt Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE MIDDLE Address: 2701 48TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 73 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project Co ostlNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. ExIstina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 05 - MIDDLE ode eoommended Low Grade - 0608 i h Grade ecommended Site 0 anslon Recommended Site 0 Development ecommended Site 0 Im rovement Existing Permanent 921 Student Stations Existing Relocatable 40 Student Stations Existina Student Stations 1,32 Existing School Capacity 1,19 NEW FIVE CLASSROOMS 4,29 11 966,413 22 8,786 NEW ONE ORCHESTRA 2,265 25 510,239 22 20410 NEW FAMILY & CONSUMER LAB 1 2,740 221 617,820 22R 28,083 NEW TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION 1 3,6101 221 B13,9971 2251 37,000 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Project T Project Cost C8 NSF F ($) ) SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE MIDDLE Address: 2701 48TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 74 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description/Project or Work Item Approx. 5 F (Sq. (q. Ft. ) Student Stations Added /Reduced I+ or Estimated Project T Project Cost C8 NSF F ($) ) Project Cost/Stu. Sta. ($/Stu. Sta. EW MEDIA CENTER 7639 1,722,471 225 EW COVERED DINING 1,200 135.16 -113 0 EW ADMINISTRATION 9,63 2,171660 225 EW TWO SKILLS LABS 1,91 44 431,620 225 9,81 EW THREE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,1701 01 263.5671 2251 01 NEW ONE ESE PT /OT 7251 01 163,3221 2251 01 NEW I ONE ART 1,5701 301 353.6761 225 REMODEL 00001 FAMILY & CONSUMER TO TWO ESE FULL -TIME 1,692 136,3 81 REMODEL 00001 MEDIA TO THREE SCIENCE LABS 4,529 6 364,929 81 EMODE 00001 ROOMS 611 -615 TO HEALTH OCCUPATIONS 1,624 -4 130,85 81 REMODEL 00001 HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TO CUSTODIAL STORAGE 736 -16 59,303 81 M EMODE 00001 ADMINISTRATION TO THREE CLASSROOMS 3,022 66 243,501 81 REMODEL 00099 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO DISTRICT FOR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE USE 4,362 -104 50,00 11 REMODE 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 12,960 -304 13,000 1 EMODE 00001 PE & BAND STUDENT STATION ADJUSTMENT 7,875 -4 0 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE MIDDLE Address: 2701 46TH TERRACE SW, NAPLES Page 75 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 Student Estimated Project Description /Project or http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R,ECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Project Cost/Stu. Building Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project Cost ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or ($) Sta. Total Cost 9.146,076 Recommended Permanent 1,239 Student Stations Recommended Relocatabie 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student 1,239 Stations Utilization Factor 90% Recommended FTE Student 1,093 Membership To Be Housed acommended School Capacity 1,11 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R,ECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GULFVIEW MIDDLE Address: 255 6TH STREET SOUTH, NAPLES Page 76 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12 :31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURV-EY_RECO 4/30/2007 A Student Estimated Project Project CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total osGNSF Sta. ( qr Ft AddedlReduced Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. (+~ or -) Cost ($) Sta. Wstina Facilltv Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR 3utlav Classiflcatlon CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE Recommended Low Grade - HI h Grade 0608 Recommended Site x anion 0 Recommended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent Student . Stations 742 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 742 Existing School CaDacltv 868 NEW TWO RESOURCE ROOMS 78 175,712 22 0 NEW EXPAND FOOD SERVICE 8 2,056 0 463,045 225 MULTIPURPOSE 0 REMODEL 00002 FOOD SERVICE FOR BETTER 8 219 0 662,264 81 UTILIZATION WITH EXPANSION 0 otal Cost 1,301,011 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 742 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 ecommended Total tudent Stations 742 Utilization Factor 90% Recommended FTE Student Membershi To Be Housed 646 ecommended School apacity 668 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURV-EY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: IMMOKALEE MIDDLE Address: 401 N 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 77 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description or Work Area Lions Stations Total CostINSF Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added etl Project ($IN$F) J$/Stu. (+ or cost ($) Sta. Rxistina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lassification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE Recommended Low Grade - 0708 i h Grade Recommended Site Ex ension 0 Recommended Site Development Recommended Site 0 Im rovement Existing Permanent Student 1,427 Stations Existing Relocatable Student 198 Stations Existing Student Stations 1,62 Existin School Capacity 1,463 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED 7,776 -198 9,000 1 45 RELOCATABLES Total Cost 9,000 Recommended Permanent 1,427 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 1,427 Stations Utilization Factor 90 Recommended FTE Student 860 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School 1,284 Capacity IMMOKALEE PLANNING ZONE District Comments ISOLATED http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 1 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MANATEE MIDDLE Address: 1920 MANATEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 78 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building DescriptionlProject or Work Area Stations Total CosVNSF Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or •) Cost ($) Sta. Ex isting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lassification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE Recommended Low Grade - 0608 i h Grade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site Development 1 0 Recommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent Student Cations 1,476 Existing Relocatable Student 0 Stations Existing Student Stations 1,47 Existing School Capacity 1,328 Total Cost Recommended Permanent 1,476 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 1,476 Stations Utilization Factor 90% Recommended FTE Student 1,306 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School 1.,328 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EE (MIDDLE) Address: 425518th Ave. NE, Naples 34120 Page 79 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SL RVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Appro Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area rea Stations Added/Reduced Total Project Cos CostIN3 Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or ($) ($/NSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 05- MIDDLE Code Recommended Low Grade - 0608 i h Grade Recommended Site 0 Expansion Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site 0 m rovement xisting Permanent Student Stations xlsting Relocatable Student Stations Exisflng Student Stations 0 Existing School Capacity NEW TWENTY -SEVEN 22,944 59 5,173,501 225 8,710 INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS NEW CUSTODIAL 2,353 0 530,563 224 0 NEW THREE INTERMEDIATE SKILLS 2,574 66 648,041 22 9,819 LABS NEW NINE SCIENCE LABS 12,350 198 2,784,726 22 14,064 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SL RVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Total project Cost al ( SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EE (MIDDLE) Address: 4255 18th Ave. NE, Naples 34120 Page 80 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprodO]. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description /Project or Work Item Appro x. Area (Sq Ft) Student Stations Added/Reduced + or - Estimated Total project Cost al ( Project CostINSF SINSF Project Cost/Stu. Sta. ($/Stu, Sta. NEW FIVE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,950 0 439693 225 0 NEW TWO ESE PART -TIME 1,700 3 383,323 225 12,777 NEW TWO ESE FULL -TIME 1,92 20 432,92 22 21,646 NEW ESE PT /OT 725 163,47 22 32,695 NEW ONEART 1,570 30 354,01 22 11,80 NEW ONEBAND 3,190 4 71929 22 15,96 NEW ONE VOCAL 1,96 25 443076 225 17,723 NEW ORCHESTRA 2,565 2 578368 22 23,135 NEW PE 11,577 120 2,610427 22 21,754 EW ONE BUSINESS LAB 1,310 22 295,38 225 13,427 NEW ONE FAMILY 8 CONSUMER LAB 2,765 22 623,46 22 28,339 NEW ONE TECHNOLOGY LAB 3,610 2 613,98 22 37000 NEW ONE HEALTH OCCUPATIONS LAB 1,112 22 250 73 22 11,397 EW MEDIA 8,036 1,811,988 225 NEW ADMINISTRATION 11,156 01 2,515,498 225 0 http: / /appprodO]. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EE (MIDDLE) Address: 4255 18th Ave. NE, Naples 34120 Page 81 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_ST RV'EY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project Description/Project or Area Stations Total CosVNSF Sta. Work Item (Sq Ft. Added/Reduced Project Cost ($1NSF) ($/Stu. (oo ($) ta.) Sta. ) NEW FOOD SERVICE 775 0 1,748,402 225 0 NEW STAGE 2,788 62864 225 0 NEW MULTIPURPOSE 3,735 64218 225 0 NEW TEXTBOOK STORAGE 8 2,320 523,123 225 0 RESTROOMS NEW ONE DETENTION 580 12 130,780 225 10,898 CLASSROOM Total Cost 25,445,628 Recommended Permanent 1,25 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student 1,258 Stations Utilization Factor I 90%j I Recommended FTE Student 1,110 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School Ca alit 1,132 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_ST RV'EY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NORTH NAPLES MIDDLE Address: 16165 LIVINGSTON ROAD, NAPLES Page 82 of 118 Date: 30-APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 DescriptionlProJect or Work AAre Student Stations Estimated Total Project Cost/stu. Building Item Area (Sq. Ft.) [Added/Reduced Project JCProject OSt/NS Sta. (+ or Cost ($) ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. Sta. EXistina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lassification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE Recommended Low Grade - 1 h Grade 0608 Recommended Site Ex anslor 0 Recommended Site Develo ment ecommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Cations 1,094 Existing Relocatable Student Cations 0 ExIstinu Student Stations 1.094 Existing School Capacitv 985 otal Cost 0 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 1,094 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stations 1 094 Utilization Factor 1 90% Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed 96 Recommended School Capacity 985 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: OAKRIDGE MIDDLE Address: 14975 COLLIER BOULEVARD, NAPLES Page 83 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 . Time: 12:31:64 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efts /!PSP_RPT_SURVFY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Protect CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Area Stations I Total Cost/NS Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or -) Cost J$) Sta. Existina Facilltv Suffix A IS TANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lassiticatlon FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE ecommended Low Grade - 0608 i h Grade Recommended Site Ex anion 0 Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site 0 Improvement Existing Permanent Student 1,470 Stations xisting Reloeatahle Student 0 tattoos Fxlstin Student Stations 1.470 Exlstin School Ca cit 1.32 otal Cost 0 ecommended Permanent 1,47 udent Stations ecommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 1,47 Stations Utilization Factor 90°x^ commended FTE Student 1,301 mbershl To Be Housed ecommended School 132 Ca cl District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efts /!PSP_RPT_SURVFY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PINE RIDGE MIDDLE Address: 1515 PINE RIDGE ROAD, NAPLES Page 84 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description/Project or Work Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project cost/Stu. Building Item Area Added/Reduced Project C"UNSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or •) Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. :xIstInn Facilltv Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 05 - MIDDLE Recommended Low Grade - Grade 0608 mmended Site Expansion mmended Site lo ment 0 rReco mmended Site vement Ing Permanent S tudent ns 1,240 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 1 Existing Student Stations 1,25 Existing School Capacity 1 12 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLE 864 -10 1,00 1 100 RENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,230 0 65,190 53 0 Total Cost 66,19 Recommended Permanent tudent Stations 1,240 ecommended Relocatable - tudent Stations 0 Recommended Total Student Stations 1 24 tilizatlon Factor 90% ecommended FTE Student embefship To Be Housed 1,094 commended School a acit 1,116 !strict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: BARRON COLLIER SENIOR HIGH Address: 5600 COUGAR DRIVE, NAPLES Page 85 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Esti mated Project ProJect Cost/Stu. uilding Description /Project or Work Item Area gtations AddedlReduced Totai Project Cos ost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Existina Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlav Classification CONTINUED USE Re—commanded Fish Use 07 - SENIOR HIGH Low Grade - 0912 Grade mmended Site 0 nsion mmended Site 0 to ment mmended Site 0 vement ing Permanent IEWmmended 2,048 ent Stations ting Relocatable 0 ent Stations tin Student Stations 2,04 tin School Ca aci 1,94 EIGHT RESOURCE ROOMS 3 120 0 802,128 257 TWO ESE RESOURCE ROOMS 1,04 0 267,376 FOUR SUPPLEMENTARY 80 0 205,674 25 INSTRUCTION COVERED DINING 7,006 0 900,595 129 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: BARRON COLLIER SENIOR HIGH Address: 5600 COUGAR DRIVE, NAPLES Page 86 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description /Project or A rox. Brea Student Stations Estimated Total ProJeet Project CosflStu. Building Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost Cost/NSF Ste. (+ or (g) ($INSF) ($IStu. Sta. NEW EXPAND CUSTODIAL 1.976 C 508014 257 0 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 241 0 140,070 58 0 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,11 0 64,380 5 otal Cost 2,888,23 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 2 048 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 Recommended Total Student tations 2,048 tiilzatlon Factor 950 Recommended FTE Student Membershi To Be Housed 1,921 Recommended School Ca acct 1,946 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GOLDEN GATE SENIOR HIGH Address: 2925 TITAN WAY, NAPLES Page 87 of 118 Dale: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 A`PProx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work 'Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. a. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project ($ /NSF) ($/Stu. ( +or -) Cost ($) Sta. Existin Faclllt Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code O7 - SENIOR HIGH Recommended Low Grade - 0912 HI h Grade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site 0 Improvement Existing Permanent Student 2,184 Stations Existing Relocatable Student Stations Existin Student Stations- 2,184 istin School Capacity 2A7 otal Cost 0 Recbmmended Permanent 2,184 Student Stations c om mended Relocatable Student Stations - ecommended Total Student 2,18 tations Utilization Factor 95% Recommended FTE Student 2,05 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School 2,075 Capacity District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GULF COAST SENIOR HIGH Address: 7878 IMMOKALEE ROAD, NAPLES Page 88 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 ox. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. wilding Description/Project or Work Item LArea Stations Total ost/NSF Sta. t ) Added lReduced Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or -) Cost ($) Bta. =xIsting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish se Code 07 - SENIOR HIGH Recommended Low rade - HI h Grade 0912 ecommended Site Ex nsion 0 ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site m rovement Existing Permanent Student Stations 2,001 Existing Relocata6le Student Stations 190 Existing Student Stations 2,191 Existing School Ca act 2,081 NEW SIX RESOURCE ROOMS 2,340 0 601,596 257 0 NEW COVERED DINING 6,890 0 885,683 12 0 REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 604 -150 6,000 1 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO REMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 1,728 -4 20,000 12 5 ]40 ADMINISTRATIVE USE http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 89 of 118 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dale: 30 -APR -2007 Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Time: 12:31:54 Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: GULF COAST SENIOR HIGH Address: 7878 IMMOKALEE ROAD, NAPLES http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R-ECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project ' Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Area Stations Total Sta. Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project Cost $1NSF) ($ /NSF) ($Isla. (+ or ($) Ste.) Total Cost 1'S13'279 Recommended Permanent 2,001 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 Student Stations Recommended Total Student - 2,001 Stations Utilization Factor 95% Recommended FTE Student 1,876 Membership To Be Housed Recommended School Capacity 1,901 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R-ECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION B _tckj 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011, SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: IMMOKALEE SENIOR HIGH Address: 701 IMMOKALEE DRIVE, IMMOKALEE Page 90 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated ject Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total IC(Plat/SiS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Add edlReduced Project Project $ /NFj ] ($/Stu. (+ or •) Cost Sta. xiatin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish 07 - SENIOR HIGH Use Code ecommended Low 0912 Grade - Hi h Grade ecommended Site Ex ansion 0 Recommended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site Im rovement Mating Permanent tudent Stations 1,71 Existing RelOCatahle Student Stations 350 xisting Student Stations 2,06 Existing School Ca acit 1,964 NEW FOUR RESOURCE 1,560 0 400,222 257 0 REMODEL 00005 ROOMS 105 8 106 AND PART OF 116 6,000 -40 530291 88 13,257 TO COVERED DINING , REMODEL 00000 RETURN LEASED RELOCATABLES 6,048 -175 7,000 1 40 TRANSFER RELOCATABLES TO IREMODEL 00099 DISTRICT FOR OTHER 7,008 -175 70,000 10 400 ADMINISTRATIVE USE http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION sack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 Description /Project or Work Item STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: IMMOKALEE SENIOR HIGH Address: 701 IMMOKALEE DRIVE, IMMOKALEE Page 91 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Total Project Cost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft .) (+ or -) Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. REMODEL 00001 ROOMS 106 & 107 TO OT /PT 1 43 -27 128,739 8 4,694 REMODEL ALL OF BUILDING 5 EXCEPT 00005 FOR ROOMS 105, 106 AND PART OF 116 10,898 -4 963,185 88 240,796 REMODEL TWO LARGE FAMILY & CONSUMER LABS RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 13,1951 1 765,310 58 01 RENOVATE 00007 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,900 0 110,20 5 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 104 0 8,032 - EN OVATE 09 000 ENTIRE BUILDING 7 0 4,5 2 5 0 RENOVATE 00010 ENTIRE BUILDING 1,05 0 60,90 58 0 RENOVATE 00011 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,00 0 23252 5 0 otal Cost 3,276,925 ecommended 1,648 Permanent Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student 0 tations ecommended Total. 1,648 Student Stations Utilization Factor 95% ecommended FTE tudent Membership 1,350 o Be Housed Recommended School 1,566 Ca acit IMMOKALEE District Comments ISOLATE[ http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis/!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Protect SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LELY SENIOR HIGH Address: 324 LELY BOULEVARD, NAPLES Page 92 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student timated Protect Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total rc Cost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) AddedfReduced roject ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. ( +or -) ost($ ) Sta. Existin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL CONDITIONALLY utlay Classification RECOMMENDED FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 07 - SENIOR HIGH ode ecommended Low 0912 rade - HI h Grade ecommended Site X anslon ecommended Site veld ment 0 ecommended Site Improvement 0 Existing Permanent 2,333 Student Stations Existing Relocatable Student Stations Existing Student Stations 2,33 Existing School Capacity 2,21 RENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 784 01 45,472 58 0 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 66 0 3,82 5 0 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 174 0 10,092 0 RENOVATE 00008 ENTIRE BUILDING 601 01 3,480 58 0 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 93 of 118 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date: 30- APR -2007 Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Time: 12:31:54 Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: LELY SENIOR HIGH Address: 324 LELY BOULEVARD, NAPLES http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostlStu. Building DescriptionlProject or Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. . Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost ($INSF ) ( $/Stu ( +or -) (s) Sta. RENOVATE 00007 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 44B 0 25,984 58 0 RENOVATE 00005 1 ENTIRE BUILDING 32 0 1,856 58 0 Total Cost 90,712 Recommended Permanent 2,33 Student Stations commended Relocatable p tudent Stations co mended Total Student 2,333 tations Utilization Factor 95% Recommended FTE Student 1,373 Membership To Be Housed ecommended School Capacity 2,21 District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NAPLES SENIOR HIGH Address: 1100 GOLDEN EAGLE CIRCLE, NAPLES Page 94 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Protect Project CosUStu. Building Description /Projector Work Item Area Stations Total CosUNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project ($ /NSF) I$IStu. SSt Existing Facility A (STANDARD SCHOOL) affix Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL CONDITIONALLY RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended ish Use Code 07 - SENIOR HIGH ecommended ow Grade - High 0912 Grade ecommended its Ex anston 0 ecommended Site Development Recommended Site Improvement Correct site drainage 100,00 Existing Permanent Student 2,155 Stations Existing Relocatable 0 Student Stations Existing Student Stations 2,155 Existing School Capacity 2 047 REMODEL 00009 PE storage to eliminate "loft" and make useable 1,000 0 88,381 Be 0 from floor level REMODEL LOCKER ROOMS, TOILETS, SHOWERS, TEACHER TOILETS & OFFICES REMODEL 00009 FOR BETTER VISUAL SUPERVISION FROM 4,895 0 432,628 88 0 TEACHER OFFICE AND FOR MODERNIZATION REMODEL 00009 I TO IMPROVE SAFETY, EXITING, AND TO 8,009 0 792,792 BB 0 EXPAND GYM SEATING [REMODEL 00009 LOBBY /CONCESSIONS TO IMPROVE EXITING 3,0041 0 265,499 88 0 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NAPLES SENIOR HIGH Address: 1100 GOLDEN EAGLE CIRCLE, NAPLES Page 95 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R.PT_SURV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Area Stations Total CostINSF Sta. Work Item (Sq. FL) Added/Reduced Protect Cost (SINSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or •) (g) Sta. EN2VATE 00009 WEIGHT ROOM 1,623 0 407,494 251 RENOVATE 00005 ENTIRE BUILDING 5 501 a 319,058 50 0 Total Cost 2,405,852 Recommended Permanent 2,155 Student Stations ecommended Relocatabie p Student Stations Recommended Total Student 2,155 Stations tilization Factor 95% ecommended FTE Student 1,732 embershi To Be Housed ecommended School Capacity 2,047 Istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_R.PT_SURV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 1 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 ascription /Project or Work Its STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY III (HIGH) Address: Sta. Page 96 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building ascription /Project or Work Its Area Stations Total ostINSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project Cost ($INSF) (s /Stu. (+ or (s) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix STANDARD SCHOOL ecommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR )Utley Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use ode 07 - SENIOR HIGH Recommended Low Grade - Hi h Grade 09 12 Recommended Site Ex ansion commended Site Develo ment 0 Recommended Site in rovement 0 xisting Permanent tudent Stations 0 xisting Relocatable tudent Stations 0 xisting Student Stations isting School Capacity 0 EW 18 senior high classrooms 16,200 450 4,163,400 25 9,25 NEW 4 senior high science labs 6 100 100 1,564,97 257 15,65 EW 2 resource rooms 780 0 200,460 257 NEW Media 1 2,3401 01 601,38 257 0 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project Project Cost/Stu. SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 Building SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 Area STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY III (HIGH) Address: Page 97 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved, District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PALMETTO RIDGE SENIOR HIGH Address: 1555 VICTORY LANE, NAPLES uaie: ou- �rrmcw� Time: 12:31:54 Student Estimated Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Added /Reduced Total Project Cost/ Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) (+ or Cost ($) ($INSF) ($/Stu. ( +or -) cost ($) Sta. NEW Adminstration 31046 0 782822 257 NEW PHYSICAL EDUCATION 3,74 0 962,465 257 FOR CONTINUED USE NEW Custodial 1,07 0 276,732 257 0 NEW FOOD SERVICE 3,87 0 994.590 257 0 NEW COVERED PATIO 1,620 0 208,1701 1291 0 NEW 2 LARGE TECHNOLOGY 10,580 50 2,719,060 257 54,381 Recommended Site Ex ansion EDUCATION LABS NEW Student toilets 676 0 173,732 257 0 otal Cost 12,647,781 ecommended Permanent 600 Student Stations ecommended elocatable Student 0 Stations Recommended Total 60 Student Stations Utilization Factor 75% Recommended FTE Student Membership To 42 Be Housed Recommended School 450 Capacity On James L. Walker Vocational site - District Comments adds high school portion to vocational school PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved, District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PALMETTO RIDGE SENIOR HIGH Address: 1555 VICTORY LANE, NAPLES uaie: ou- �rrmcw� Time: 12:31:54 Student Estimated http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 APP Project Project CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Area Stations Total osUNSF Sta. Item pddedlReduced Project ($/NSF) (Sta.) ( +or -) cost ($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED lassiflcation FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 07 - SENIOR HIGH Recommended Low Grade - 0912 HI h Grade Recommended Site Ex ansion http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl. us:7778 /efis /!PSP RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 98 of 118 Recommended Site Develo Mont C Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 2.112 Existing Relocatable Student Stations Existin Student Stations 2112 Existin School Ca acit 2.00 otal Cost Recommended Permanent Student Stations 2,112 _ ecommended Relocatable Stutlent Stations _ 0 Recommended Total Student Stations 2,112 tilization Factor 95% Recommended FTE Student 'Membership To Be Housed 1981 ecommended School 1kaeacity 2,006 District Comments htip: / /appprod0l . doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 99 of 118 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: EVERGLADES SCHOOL Address: 415 SCHOOL DRIVE, EVERGLADES http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description/Projector' ork Item Area Stations Ad Total Protect Cost INS Ste. (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) (+ Cost($) ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. Ste. Exlstin Faciiitv Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR utla Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 09 - COMBINATION Code ecommended Low Grade PK 12 HI h Grade Recommended Site 0 Ex ansion Recommended Site 11 Development Recommended Site 0 Improvement Existing Permanent 557 tudent Stations xisfing Relocatable tudent Stations xisun Student Stations 55 istin School Ca aci 501 otal at 0 Recommended Permanent 557 tudent Stations ommended Relocatable Student Stations ecommended Total 557 tudent Stations Utilization Factor 90 Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be 155 oused Recommended School 501 Capacity Geographically Isolated. This small District Comments K -12 serves only Everglades City area. http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 Description(Project or Work Ite STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EEE (HIGH) Address: East of 1 -75 Page 100 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 - A pprox. Student Estimated Project Project CosUStu. Buildin Description(Project or Work Ite Area Stations Added /Reduced Total CostINS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Project Cost ($1N9 ($ /Stu. (for -! 13) Sta. EX lsting Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE - Recommended Fish Use 09 - COMBINATION Code Recommended Low Grade - 0612 High Grade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site evelo ment 0 Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 0 xisting Relocatable Student Stations 0 Istina Student Stations 0 Isting School Capacity 0 EW 21 classrooms 18,90 525 5704,65 302 10,86 EW 1 custodial 3,297 0 995,11 302 0 EW 8 skills labs 1 7,204 2001 2,173,19 30 1086 EW 6 science labs 1 9,1501 1501 2,761,59 30 18,411 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R-ECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EEE (HIGH) Address: East of I -75 Page 101 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Building Description /Project or Work Item Approx. Area (Sq. Ft.) Student Stations +or - Estimated Total Project Cost ($) Project CosVNSF $INSF) Project Cost/Stu. Sta. ($ /Stu. Sta. NEW 1 ROTC 1.5801 25 476,840 302 19,0 EW 8 resource 3,1201 0 941.668 302 0 EW 3 ESE art-time 2.9251 45 882919 302 19,620 NEW 3 ESE full -time 3,10 30 935,618 302 31,187 NEW 1 ESE vocational 1.4101 12 425,416 302 35,451 NEW 3 ESE resource 1,5601 0 470,678 302 0 EW 4 supplementary instruction 8001 01 241,394 30 NEW 3 art 5.3621 841 1,618,3661 30 192 NEW 1 band 4.1901 451 1.264,5611 30 28101 NEW 1 orchestra 2.7661 281 834,6831 30 29,81 EW 1 general music 1,73 2 524,014 302 18,715 EW 1 PE 2372 120 7,160,888 302 59,67 NEW 2 business education labs 4 880 60 1,472,807 302 24,547 NEW 2 distributive & diversified labs -small 4;250 50 1,282,83 302 25 657 NEW 1 family & consumer -practical 2,995 30 903 958 302 30,132 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated Total Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 Item STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY EEE (HIGH) Address: East of 1.75 Ste. ($ /Stu. Page 102 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Description/Project or Work Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost/Stu. Buildin Item Area (Sq. Ft) Added[ Reduced Project Cost ost/NS ($INSF) Ste. ($ /Stu. ( +or-) ($) Sta. NEW 1 family &consumer - medium 3,14 30 949218 302 31,641 NEW 1 health occupations-small 3,07 30 926,693 302 30,890 NEW 1 media 13,91 0 4,198,91 302 0 EW 1 administration 17,07 0 57153,230 302 0 EW 1 foodservica 19,836 0 5,988850 30 0 EW 1 auditorium 8,38 0 1,929,88 302 0 NEW 1 stage 2,852 860,60 302 NEW 1 textbook, student & public 3,61 0 7,089,677 302 toilets 0 NEW 1 detention classroom 790 20 238,420 302 11,921 otal Cost 52,404,594 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 1,512 Recommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stations 1 512 Utilization Factor 90% Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed 1,336 Recommended School Capacity 1,361 District Comments Core facilities for build-out to 1957 student stations http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION We SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL Address: 3710 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES Page 103 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l .doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R-ECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Area Stations Total F Sta. Item (Sq. FL) Added /Reduced Projec[ $INSF) ($ /NSF ($IStu. (+ or •) Cost ($) Sta. Existin Faciilt Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital Outlay SCHOOL RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE 10 - ALTERNATIVE Recommended Fish Use Code EDUCATION Recommended Low Grade - 0612 I h Grade Recommended Site Expansion 0 Recommended Site evelo ment .commended Site Correct site drainage 100,000 m rovement xlsting Permanent Student 262 lations Existing Relocatable Student 0 tatlons Existin Student Stations 262 Existin School Ca scat 26 otal Cost 100,000 .commended Permanent 262 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 tudent Stations Recommended Total Student 262 Stations Utilization Factor 100% ecommended FTE Student 211 Membershi I To Be Housed ecommended School 26 apecity District Comments http: / /appprod0l .doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_R-ECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY KKK (HIGH) Address: 3170 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES -Page 104 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Total F Sta. ( 5 Ft. dtled /Reduced Project (ostIN ) (S /Stu. (+ or Cost($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A (STANDARD SCHOOL) Recommended SCHOOLRECOMMENDEDFOR apkel Outlay CONTINUED USE Classification R ecommended Fish Use Code 10 - ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION R ecommended Low 06 12 Ga - High Grade ecommended Site xrde anslon 0 ecommended Site Development 0 Recommended Site m rovement 0 )sting Permanent tudent Stations 0 isting Relocatable, Student Stations Exladng Student Stations Existing School Ca acit 0 UTILIZE BUILDING #9 AT JAMES L WALKER TECHNICAL CENTER FOR USE AS 2 NEW INTERMEDIATE CLASSROOMS, 3 HIGH 10,639 144 1 0 0 SCHOOL CLASSROOMS, TECHNOLOGY LAB & ADMINISTRATION Total Cost 1 Recommended Permanent Student 144 Stations Recommended Reloeatable Student 0 ns mmended Total 144 nt Stations ation Factor 100% mmended FTE nt Membership f 119 Housed mmended 144 ol Ca aci ct Comments PHOENIX- ALTERNATIVE TO EXPULSION — CURRENTLY EXISTS AT THIS SITE http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 105 of 118 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date: 1R31:54 Time: 12:31:54 Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY JJJ (HIGH) Address: 508 N 9TH ST, IMMOKALEE http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Pro act Approx. Student Estimated Project CosUStu. Building Description/Project or Work Item Area Stations Added/Reduced Lions Total Project ostlNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) (+ or Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. Exlstin Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Outlay Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use 11 -ADULT EDUCATION Code ecommended Low AE AE redo - HI hGrade ecommended Site 0 nsion commended Site p evelo ment ecommended Site p Inn rovement Existing Permanent Student Stations xlsting Relocatable p tudent Stations Existin Student Stations 0 Exlstin School Ca acit EW ONE MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL LAB 3 47 2 893,07! 257 44,654 EW DINING 1,320 01 339,24C 267 1 NEW THREE MEDIUM AGRICULTURE 14,265 6 3,666,105 257 61,10 LABS NEW TWO FAMILY & CONSUMER 5,730 40 1,472,610 257 36,81 CULINARY ARTS, CHILDCARE http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SLTRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY JJJ (HIGH) Address: 508 N 9TH ST, IMMOKALEE Page 106 of 118 Date; 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Buildin Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total Cost/NS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) AddedlRaduced Project ($ /NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. NEW ONE VOCATIONAL WORK 1,755 0 451,035 - 257 EVALUATION LAB 0 NEW ONE VPI LAB 2,04 525,565 257 0 YEW MEDIA 113 290,41 25 0 NEW FOUR HEALTH OCCUPATIONS 18,280 8 4,178,820 257 62,23 LABS NEW ADMINISTRATION 3929 1,009,753 25 0 EW TOILETS TEXTBOOK STORAGE 732 188;124 257 0 EW CUSTODIAL 1,150 295.551 25 NEW FIVE SKILLS LABS 4,600 125 1,156,500 25 9,252 NEW TWO RESOURCE ROOMS 780 200,48 257 0 NEW PHYSICAL EDUCATION SPACE 3,713 954,241 257 0 EW TWO BUSINESS PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE LABS 3,600 5 925,200 257 18,504 NEW ONE LARGE TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION LAB 5,290 25 1,359,630 257 54,381 EW TWO LARGE INDUSTRIAL LAB 11,60 40 2,981,20C 257 74,530 otal Cost 20,887,418 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 440 ecommended Relocatable tudent Stations 0 ecommended Total tudent Stations 440 Utilization Factor 150% ecommended FTE tudent Membership To Be 0 Housed Recommended School C Capacltv 660 District Comments ON THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY USED BY THE LEARNING CENTER http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Page 107 of 118 PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date: 30- APR -2007 Sack 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Time: 12:31:54 Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER Address: 5775 OSCEOLA TRAIL, NAPLES http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Protect Protect Costl5tu. Building Desc�IptlonlProject or Work Area Stations Total Sta. Item (Sq. Ft) Added /Reduced Project ($INSF) ($INS) (Sta.) (+ or •) Cost ($) Sta. Existina Facility Suffix. F ANCILLARY FACILITY ecommended Capital Outlay ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE 12-COUNTY Recommended Fish Use Code ADMINISTRATION Recommended Low Grade - CA CA Hi h Grade Recommended Site 0 Expansion Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site 0 Im rovement xisting Permanent Student 0 Stations xisting Relocatable Student 0 tations x1stino Student Stations xisting School Capacity 0 otal Cost Recommended Permanent - 0 Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 tudent Stations ecommended Total Student dons tilixation Factor 1000/1 ecommended FTE Student embershla To Be Housed ecommended School 0 Ca ac istrict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis/!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: NEW FACILITY ANA (ANCILLARY) Address: Collier County Page 108 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description /Project or Work APProx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project Cost/Stu. Buildin Item Area AddedlReduced Project CostINS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) ( +or -) Cost ($) ($INSF) ($ /Stu. Sta. =xIstina Facilltv Suffix F ANCILLARY FACILITY ecommended Capital Outlay ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED lassiflcation FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Code 13-WAREHOUSE Recommended Low Grade - HI h Grade DS DS ecommended Site z ansion 0 Recommended Site Development 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student aUons xisting Relocatable, Student Stations 0 istin Student Stations 0 isHn School Capacity EW WAREHOUSE 52,800 0 8,396,811 150 0 otal Cost 8,396 811 ecommended Permanent tudent Stations 0 Recommended Relocatable Student Stations 0 ecommended Total Student Stations 0 tilization Factor 1000/1 Recommended FTE Student embershl To Be Housed 0 Recommended School a aGt istdct Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back ?`Area 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: IMMOKALEE TRANSPORTATION Address: 9950 STOCKADE ROAD, IMMOKALEE Page 109 of 118 Date: 30 -APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl .us:7778 /efis/!PSP R.PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 ?`Area Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Area Stations Total ost/NS Sta. Item (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project $1NSF) ($/NSF) ($/Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. ExIstina Facility Suffix F ANCILLARY FACILITY ecommended Capital Outlay ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED lassi"Cation FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use 15 - TRANSPORTATION ode ecommended Low Grade - DS DS i h Grade ecommended Site 0 x ension Recommended Site 0 Development Recommended Site 0 m rovemant Existing Permanent Student 0 Stations Existing Relocatable Student Stations Existin Student Stations Exietln School Ca acit RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,746 100,504 3 otal Cost 100,504 Recommended Permanent 0 Student Stations ecommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 11E 0 Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student 0 - Membershi To Be Housed Recommended School Ca acit District Comments http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl .us:7778 /efis/!PSP R.PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006.2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MAINTENANCE 8 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Address: 5702 COUGAR LANE, NAPLES Page 110 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SLTRV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 A Student Estimated Project Project CosNStu. uiltling Description/Project or Work Item Area Area tat ns io [A Total CosttNS Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Project ($INSF) ($ /Stu. ( +or -) (+ Cost ($) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix S (ANCILLARY FACILITY WITH STUDENT STATIONS ecommended Capital ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED FOR Dutlay Classification CONTINUED USE secommended Fish e Code 15 - TRANSPORTATION 'commended Low Grade - Hi h Grade DS DS ecommended Site Ex ansion R ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended I te m rovement 0 xisting Permanent tudent Stations 0 Existing Relocataele Student Stations 0 Existing Student Stations 0 Existing School Ca acct 0 NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT RATTLESNAKEHAMMOCK LOCATION 25,00 0 3,975,763 159 RENOVATE 00002 ENTIRE BUILDING 1 5,1211 C 187,429 37 RENOVATE 00004 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,670 0 170 92 37 111 RENOVATE OOOD6 ENTIRE BUILDING 2,125 0 78,51 3 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SLTRV'EY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back Approa. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2008 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MAINTENANCE & TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Address: 5702 COUGAR LANE, NAPLES Page 111 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approa. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Area Stations Total ostINSF Sta. Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost ($INSF) ($..) I+ or ($) RENOVATE 00001 ENTIRE BUILDING 19,945 0 729,987 37 0 ENOVATE 00003 ENTIRE BUILDING 11,330 0 414,678 3 0 Total Cost 5,557,29 Recommended Permanent 0 Student Stations ommended Relocatable dent Stations ommended Total Student 0 ions zation Factor [Recommended 100 ommended FTE Student mbershi To Be Housed School Capacity 0 rict Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION .PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Bank 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: BETHUNE EDUCATION CENTER Address: 614 S 5TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 112 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us: 7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total osUN3 Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Pro ect Cost / ($ /NSF) ($ISt.. (+ or •) (g) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED )utlaY Classification FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use ode 19 - MULTIPLE USE SUPPORT ecommended Low Grade DS DS HI h Grade ecommended Site anslon 0 ecommended Site evelo ment 0 Recommended Site Im rovement 0 Existing Permanent Student Stations 29 Existing Relocatable Student Stations 5 Existing Student Stations 348 Existing School Capacity 346 REMODEL 00000 Return leased relocatables 1 72 -50 5 000 3 100 EMODEL 00001 Convert 102 10 840 -49 10,000 1 204 REMODEL 00005 to Convert ancilla 3,453 -92 191,748 56 2,084 REMODEL I 00003 Convert to ancillary 2,48 -63 5 000 2 7 http : / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us: 7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION sack Approx. 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Project SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: BETHUNE EDUCATION CENTER Address: 614 S 5TH STREET, IMMOKALEE Page 113 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.R.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project CostiSta. Building Description /Project or Area Stations Total CO Sta. Work Item (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced Project Cost ($ INSF /NSF) ($Isla. (+ or (g) Sta. REMODEL 00004 Convert to ancillary 354 -92 196,746 66 2,139 REMODEL 00002 Convert to ancillary 3 877 0 5,000 1 Total Cost 413,494 Recommended Permanent [Student Stations Recommended Relocatable Student Stations Recommended Total Student 0 Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student p Membershi To Be Housed Recommended School Ca aci 0 Buildings 2, 3 > 50 District Comments years s old d http: / /appprod0l. doe. state.R.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Bask 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PRODUCTION/WAREHOUSE Address: 2149 ANDREW DRIVE, NAPLES Page 114 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.R.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SLIRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Description/Project or Work Approx. Student Stations Estimated Total Project Project CostiStu. Building Item 9 Ft) Added/Reduced Project (+ or -) Cost ($) ($/ NSF) ($IStu. Ste .xisting Facility Suffix F ANCILLARY FACILITY - Recommended Capital Outlay ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED lassificatfon FOR CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 19 - MULTIPLE USE SUPPORT ecommended Low Grade - DS DS HI h Grade ecommended Site x anslon 0 ecommended Site evelo ment 0 ecommended Site Correct site drainage 50,000 m rovement Existing Permanent Student Stations 0 Existing Relocalable Student tations 0 Existing Student Stations 0 Existing School Capacity RENOVATE 00009 ENTIRE BUILDING 4,340 156 240 36 otal Cost J 206,240 Recommended Permanent Student Stations 0 Recommended Reiocatable Student Stations 0 Recommended Total Student Stations Utilization Factor 100% Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed 0 Recommended School Capacity 0 District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.R.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_P,PT_SLIRVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER Address: 615 3RD AVENUE SOUTH, NAPLES Page 115 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Project Project Cost/Stu. Building DescriptionlProJectorWOrk Area Stations Total Sta. Item (Sq.Ft.) AddedlReduced Project ($ /NS) ($INSF) (Ste.) (+ or Cost ($) Sta. Ezistin Fadl Suffix F ANCILLARY FACILITY Recommended Capital Outlay ANCILLARY RECOMMENDED Classification FOR CONTINUED USE ecommended Fish Use Cod 19 - MULTIPLE USE SUPPORT DS DS Recommended Low Grade - HI h Grade Recommended Site 0 Ex anion ecommended Site 0 Develo ment Recommended Site 0 Im rovement Existing Permanent Student 0 Stations xlating Relocatable Student 0 tationa xiatin Student Stations 0 satI n School Capacity 0 otal Cost 0 ecommended Permanent 0 tudent Stations Recommended Relocatable p Student Station ecommended Total Student 0 tations Utilization Factor 100% commended FTE Student p mbershi To Be Housed Recommended School 0 Ce acil District Comments http: / /appprod0l.doe.state.fl.us :7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu Estimated SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: JAMES L WALKER VOCATIONAL- TECHNICAL CENTER Address: 3702 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES Page 116 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Approx. Student Estimated Protect Project Cost /Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Area Stations Total Cost/NSF Sta. (Sq. Ft.) Added/Reduced, Project ($/NSF) ($ /Stu. (+ or •) Cost I$) Sta. Existing Facility Suffix A STANDARD SCHOOL Recommended Capital SCHOOL RECOMMENDED FOR Dutle Classification CONTINUED USE Recommended Fish Use Code 20 - VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL Recommended Low VE VE rade - HI h Grade commended Site Ex ansion acommended Site Devalo ment 0 ecommended Site m rovement 0 xisting Permanent - Student Stations 77 xisting Relocatable tudent Stations 175 Mating Student tations 951 Existing School a sell 1 141 EW 2 Industrial Education Small Education 12,850 10C 4,144,809 323 41,448 Labs & 2 Medium REMODEL 00001 First floor for use as administration, 15,938 -42 1,809,650 114 43,087 media, dinin . & cus t Odle receivin EMODEL I 00000 Return leased relooatables 6,048 -175 7,0001 1 4 Second floor for use as 2. classrooms, 2 REMODEL 00001 VPI labs, & 2 small technology education 15,614 28 1,772,862 114 63,317 . labs http: / /appprod0l. doe. state. fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION PRINT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Back] YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: JAMES L WALKER VOCATIONAL - TECHNICAL CENTER Address: 3702 ESTEY AVENUE, NAPLES Page 117 of 118 Date: 30- APR -2007 Time: 12:31:54 r wrvull vGr-/1R 11111CIY 1 Vr rL Ii I IUIV Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MARCO ISLAND CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_PPT SURVEY RECO Uare: JU- AF'K -ZUU7 Time: 12:31:54 4/30/2007 Building Dascriptfon /Project or Work Item Approx. Area Student Stations Estimated Total Project Pro /ect Cost(Stu. (Sq. Ft.) Added /Reduced Project ostlN3 ($ /NSF) Sta. ($/Stu. (+ or Cost ($) Sta. For use as 2 Medium Industrial Education REMODEL 00002 Labs, 1 Small Industrial Education Lab, 1 16,689 Classroom, 1 Business Education Lab, -4 1,894,921 114 473 73 student & staff toilets and teacher tannin For use as 4 Family &Consumer Practicel REMODEL 00004 Experience Labs, 2 Classrooms, 3 Business Education Practical Experience Labs, student 18,159 148 1,834,743 114 12,397 & staff toilets, & teacher planning REMODEL 00005 For use as 1 Health Occupations Small 3,346 5 Education Lab 379,915 114 75,983 For use as 3 Family & Consumer Practical REMODEL 00006 Experience Labs, 2 Health Occupations Small Education Labs, student & staff toilets 16,623 -43 1,887,427 114 43,894 and teacher tannin For use as 2 Health Occupations Small REMODEL 00007 Education Labs, 2 Resource Rooms, 1 Skills g 242 Lab, student & staff toilets, & teacher 19 1,049,366 114 55,230 annin CONVERT BUILDING AND 1 ACRE OF REMODEL 00009 LAND TO ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL USE 10,639 -162 634,133 60 3,914 PHOENIX PROGRAM For use as 2 Small Technology Educetion EMODEL 00003 Labs, 1 Skills Lab, 1 Medium Technology Education Lab, student & staff toilets, and 11 430 100 1,297,798 114 12,97 teacher DIanning otal Cost 16,712,624 ecommended ermanentStudent 92 tations ecommended elocatable Student 0 Cations ecommended Total tudent Stations 925 t111zation Factor 120°/ ecommended FTE Student Membership C o Be Housed ecommended SchoolCapacity 1,110 istrict Comments r wrvull vGr-/1R 11111CIY 1 Vr rL Ii I IUIV Back 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Menu SURVEY YEAR 2006 -2011 SURVEY 3 VERSION 1 STATUS Active Approved District Name: COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Facility Name: MARCO ISLAND CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL http: / /appprod0l. doe .state.fl.us:7778 /efis /!PSP_PPT SURVEY RECO Uare: JU- AF'K -ZUU7 Time: 12:31:54 4/30/2007 5 YEAR SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Address: 1401 TRINADAD AVENUE, MARCO ISLAND Page 118 of 118 PRINT Back http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efts /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 Student Estimated Project Approx. Stations Total Project Cost/Stu. Building Description /Project or Work Item Added /Reduced Project ostIN F Sta. S Ft. (q. F) (+ or Cost ($) ) ($ /Stu. Ste. C (DISTRICT OWNED Existing Facility Suffix CONVERSION CHARTER SCHOOL Recommended Capital LEASED TO ANOTHER ENTITY Outlay Classification Recommended Fish Use 23 - LEASED TO ANOTHER Code ENTITY Recommended Low Grade - LS LS High Grade Recommended Site p Expansion Recommended Site 0 Development - Recommended Site 0 Improvement Existing Permanent Student 541 Stations Existing Relocatable Student Stations xistina Student Stations 541 xisting School Capacity 541 EMODEL 00002 Lease to Charter School 26.234 -168 0 0. 0 EMODEL 00001 Lease to Charter School 40 653 -373 0 0 0 otal Cost - 0 Recommended Permanent Student Stations Recommended Relocatable 0 - Student Stations Recommended Total Student Stations Utilization Factor 100 Recommended FTE Student Membership To Be Housed Recommended School capacity Operated by a Charter School - District Comments COFTE accrue to Charter School PRINT Back http: / /appprod0l. doe. state .fl.us:7778 /efts /!PSP_RPT_SURVEY_RECO 4/30/2007 v r N ia' District Collfer County Total Stations 909 Gross Sq Ft: 125,693 1 050 P-8 May-09 Costperstusta $19,091 Total Cost $17,353,719 Level: Elementary PK -5 kin Student Capacity 909 Utilization: 100% ff 11 Acres Recommended(Afln.) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL 812 I No. Fta6 150 150 - CAPACITY STATIONS Subtotal spn9a>•. cgpg QFsSlrIjIPTION UNIT TOTA! „PER�U,NIT. UTILIZED SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB 2 GRAND TOTALS PK -3 93,369 882 909 2 808 STANDARD CLASSROOMS too 200 2 614 32 OO1 PK -3 Primary Classroom 882 28,224 18 576 Subtotal l 32 808 Storage, Material 100 3,200 - PHYSICAL EDUCATION 4 811 Storage, Outside 50 200 315 1 014 32 814 Toilet, Student 40 1,280 Subtotal 3,587 . 3,587 Subtotal 1,112 33,084 RESOURCE- REGULAR 14 002 4 -8 Inteimediata /Middle Clas 858 12,012 22 308 808 14 808 Storage, Material 100 1,400 Subtotal 7 815/816 Toilet; Student -Male 40 280 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION j 1 7 816 Toilet, Student- Female 40 280 975 15 15 1 808 II I Storage, Material Subtotal 1,038 13,972 815/816 Toilet, Student- Male/Far 40 40 MUSIC Subtotal 1,t 15 1,115 1 055 P -6 Elementary Music 1,000 1,000 22 Il 1 806 Reference 100 100 1 810 Storage, Material 100 100 1 831 Practice; Music 70 70 Subtotal 1,270 1,270 Page 1 909 Elementary Facility Ust ART 1 050 P-8 Elemeritary Art 1,036 1,056 28 1 805 kin 60 60 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 812 Storage, Project 150 150 Subtotal 1,346 1,346 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB 2 010 PK -3 Priinary- Skills Labs 882 1,764 18 2 808 Storage, Material too 200 2 614 Toilet Student 40 Subtotal 1,022 .80 2,044 - PHYSICAL EDUCATION 1 013 PKS P. E. Storage 315 315 1 014 PK -5 Covered Play Area 3,272 ,3,272 Subtotal 3,587 . 3,587 RESOURCE- REGULAR — 6 040 PK -12 Resource Room 290 1,740 10 6 808 Storage, Maternal 100 600 Subtotal 390 2,340 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION 1 061 PK -12 ESE Part-time 975 975 15 15 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 815/816 Toilet, Student- Male/Far 40 40 Subtotal 1,t 15 1,115 1 062 PK -12 ESE Full -time 950 950 10 10 Page 1 909 Elementary Facility Ust it II II II �l II District: Collier County Level: Elementary PK -5 11 Acres Recommended (Min.) W. RSn 1 064 N -PK 1 808 1 813 1 817 1 2 065 PK -12 2 808 2 813 380 P -PS 381 P -PS 382 P -PS 3B3 P -PS 384 P -PS 385 P -PS 386 P -PS 387 P -PS 388 P -PS 389 P -PS 390 P -PS 391 P -PS 300 N -PS 301 N -PS 302 I4 -PS 303 N -PS 384 N -PS 305 N -PS 306 N -PS 307 N -PS 308 N -PS 309 N -PS 310 N -PS 311 N -PS 312 N -PS 313 N -PS 314 N -PS 315 N -PS 316 N -PS 819- 821'P -PS 1 340 N -PS 1 341 N -PS Page 2 Total Stations . 909 Gross Sq Ft: May -09 Cost per stu sta $19,091 Total Cost Student Capacity 909 Utilization: NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL - -- - -• CAPACITY STATIONS Subtotal 1,130 1,130 ESE PT /OT 475 475 Storage, Material 100 100 Storage, Student 40 40 RR and Bath, Student 110 110 Subtotal 725 725 ESE Resource Room 380 760 Storage, Material 100 200 Storage, Student 40 80 Subtotal 520 1,040 MEDIA CENTER Reading Room /Stacks 3,363 3,383 Technical Processing 364 364 Prod.Professional Lib. 364 364 A -V Storagge 545 545 Periodical Storage 182 182 C.C.Television 636 636 C.C.T.V.Stbrage 455 455 Media Production Lab 455 455 Copying Room 182 182 Small Group Listening 91 91 Group Projects 455 455 Maintenance Repair 91 91 Subtotal 7,183 7,183 ADMINISTRATION Principal's/Dir Office 250 250 Asst Prin/Other Office 175 875 Bookkeeping Office 125 125 Secretarial Space 158 316 Admin. Reception 773 773 Pr6du&flonNV6rkroom 364 364 Conference Rooms 636 636 Clinic 273 273 Admin. Storage 455 455 RecordsNauft 273 273 School Store 91 91 Student Activities Area 455 455 Computer Area 136 136 Careers Room 273 273 Itinerant Office 125 375 Teacher Planning Area 1,818 1,818 Teacher Lounge/Dining 364 364 Toilets, Staff (M & F) 364 364 Subtotal 7,108 8,216 FOOD SERVICE Dining 3,636 3,636 Kitchen 4,000 4,000 0 0 4 0 125,693 $17,353,719 10D% 909 Elementary Facility List 1 District: Collier County Total Stations 909 Gross Sq Ft: 7,818 May -09 Cost per stu sta $19,091 Total Cost Level: Elementary PK-5 Student Capacity 909 Utilization: 11 Acres Recommended (Min.) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL No. Flsa - -•- - -- CAPACITY STATIONS SPACES WDE DESCRIPTION UNIT ,. TOTAL, _ PER UNIT, UTILIZED. Page 3 125,693 $17,353,719 100 909 Elementary Faculty List Subtotal 7,818 7,818 STAGE 1 363 N -PS Stage 990 990 1 364 N -PS Storage 455 455 1 3651366 N -PS Dressing (M & 455 455 1 367 N -PS Control Booth 100 100 1 Subtotal 2,000 2,000 1 1 MULTIPURPOSE , 1 361 N -PS Multipurpose Room 2,818 2,818 1 362 N -PS Chair Storage 182 182 Subtotal 3,000 3,000 OTHER SPACES 1 368 N -PS Textbook Storage 318 318 2 815/816 Student Toilets 682 1,364 2 8221823 Public Toilets 91 182 Subtotal 1,091 1,864 CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Receiving 1,000 1,000 1 333 N -PS Flammable Storage 155 155 1 334 N-PS Equipment Storage 500 500 Subtotal 1,655 1,655 Page 3 125,693 $17,353,719 100 909 Elementary Faculty List 1.. 7 I District: Collier- Immokales K Total Stations 792 Gross Sq Ft: 104,566 Elemeritary G May -D9 $19,091 Cost per Stu Sta $15,120,072 Level: Eferhanfary K-6, K-5 Student Capacity 792 Utilization: ton. 9 Acres Required NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. Fish - -- • —•• CAPACITY STATIONS ;enCEs,. CODE _. DE,S¢RIP.,TION. UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT UTILIZED,. GRAND TOTALS 77,674 792 . STANDARD CLASSROOMS 24 001 PK-3 Primary Classroom 802 19,248 18 432 24 808 Storage, Material 100 2,400 9 811 Storage, Outside 50 450 24 814 Toilet, Student 40 960 Subtotal ---'W —= 15 002 4 -6 Intermediate /Middle Claw 842 12,630 22 330 15 8D8 Storage, Material 100 1,500 7 815 Toilet, Student -Male 40 280 7 816 Toilet, Student - Female 40 280 Subtotal 1,022 14,690 MUSIC 1 055 P-6 Elementary Music 1,000 1,000 22 1 806 Reference 100 100 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 am Practice, Music 70 70 Subtotal 1,270 1,270 ART 1 050 P -6 Elementary Art 1,036 1,036 28 1 805 KIM 60 60 1 868 Storage, Matedal 100 100 1 812 Storage, Project 150 150 Subtotal 1,346 1,346 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB 2 010 PK -3 Primary - Skills Labs 882 1,764 18 2 808 Slbfage, Meterisi 100 200 2 814 Toilet, Student 44 86 Subtotal 1,026 2,052 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 1 013 Pk-5 P. E. Storage 315 315 1 014 PK -5 Covered Play Area 2,851 2,851 Subtotal 3,160 3,166 RESOURCE- REGULAR - - 3 040 PK -12 Resource Room 290 870 10 3 BOB Storage, Material 100 300 Subtotal 380 1,170 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION 1 061 PKA2 ESE Part-time 850 850 15 15 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 815 Toilet, Student -Male 40 40 1 816 Toilet, Student - Female 40 40 Subtotal 1,030 1,030 . Page 1 792 Elementary Facility List f" District: Coilier4mmokales K Total Stations 792 Gross Sq Ft: 104,565 Elementary G May -09 $19,091 Costperstusta $15,120,072 Level: Elementary K -6, K -5 Student Capacity 792 Utilization: 100% 9 Acres Reciii"d NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL No. Flsli - -• - -• - - -••• CAPACITY STATIONS SFAms CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT. TOTAL. PER UNIT UTILIZED 1 062 PK -12 ESE Full -time 850 850 10 10 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 817 RR and Bath. Student 110 110 1 Subtotal 950 950 1 064 N -PK ESE PT /OT 475 .475 5 5 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 813 Storage, Student 40 40 1 817 RR and Bath, Student 110 110 C.C.Televisfon Subtotal 725 725 1 065 PK -12 ESE Resource Room 1 868 1 Storage, Material 1 813 Principal's/Dir Office Storage, Student 301 N -PS Subtotal 1 302 MEDIA CENTER 1 380 P -PS Reading Room/Stacks 1 381 P -PS Technical Processing 1 382 P -PS Prod.Professional Lib. 1 383 P -PS A -V Storage 1 384 P -PS Periodical Storage 1 385 P -PS C.C.Televisfon 1 388 P -PS C.C.T.V.Siorage 1 387 P-PS Media Production Lab 1 388 P -PS Cbpying Room 1 389 P -PS Shall Group Listening 1 390 P -PS Group Projects 1 391 P -PS Maintenance Repair Student Activities Area 1 Subtotal 380 380 100 ADMINISTRATION 1 300 N -PS Principal's/Dir Office 3 301 N -PS Asst Prin /Other Office 1 302 N -PS Bookkeeping Office 2 303 N -PS Secrefariel Space 1 304 N-PS Admin. Reception 1 305 N-PS Production/Workroom 1 306 N -PS Conference Rooms 1 307 N -PS Clinic 1 -308 N -PS Admin. Storage 1 309 - N -PS Records/Vault 1 310 N -PS School Stare 1 311 N-PS Student Activities Area 1 312 N -PS CofnputerArea 1 313 N -PS Careers Room 2 314 N -PS Itinerant Office 1 315 N -PS Teacher Planning Area 1 316 N -PS Teacher Lounge/Dining 1 819 -821' P -PS Toilets, Staff (M & F) Subtotal 380 380 100 100 40 40 520 520 2,930 2,930 317 317 317 317 475 475 16B 158 554 554 396 396 396 396 158 158 79 79 3g6 396 79 79 6,255 6,255 250 250 175 525 125 125 15B 316 673 673 317 317 554 554 238 238 396 396 238 238 79 79 396 396 119 119 238 238 125 250 1,584 1,584 317 317 317 317 6,299 6,932 4 0 Page 2 792 Elementary Facility List r District: Collier- Immokales K Total Stations 792 Gross Sq Ff: 104,585 Elementary G May-09 $19,091 Cost per stu sta $15,120,672 Level: Elementary K-6, K-5 Student Capacity 792 Utilization: 100% ( l 9 Acres Required NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. PER -- -- - --- CAPACITY STATIONS SPACES CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT. TOTAL PERUNIT UHL&ED (� FOOD SERVICE 1 340 N -PS Dining 3,168 3,168 1 341 N -PS IOtchen 3,485 3,485 1 349 N -PS Chair Storage 158 158 - Subtotal 6,811 6,811 STAGE 1 363 N-PS Stage 990 990 1 364 N-PS Storage 396 396 1 l 1 365/368 N -PS Dressing (M & F) • 396 396 1 381 N -PS Control Booth 100 100 Subtotal 1,882 1,882 l MULTIPURPOSE 1 361 N -PS Multipurpose Room 2,455 2,455 1 352 N -PS Chair Storage 158 158 Subtotal 2,613 2,613 II OTHER SPACES 1 368 N-PS Textbook Storage 277 277 2 015/816 Student Toilets 594 1,1138 2 8221823 Public Toilets 79 158 Subtotal 950 1,623 CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Receiving 871 871 l l 333 N -PS Flammable Storage 155 155 334 N -PS Equipment Storage 500 500 I_ Subtotal 1,526 1,526 i Page 3 792 Elementary Facility List �I District: Collier Total Stations 1,196 Gross Sq Ft: 153,003 May -09 $20,616 Costperstu sta $24,656,736 Level: Middle 6 -8 Student Capacity 1,076 Utilization: 90% 13 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. FISH -• —• - - -•• CAPACITY STATIONS SPACE9CODE, DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT UTILIZED GRAND TOTALS 109,350 1,196 STANDARD CLASSROOMS - 27 002 4 -8 Intermediate/Middle Clas 858 23,166 22 594 Subtotal — 958- ___2Tif SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB 3 011 4 -8 IntermedlMidSkllls Labs 858 2,574 22 66 3 808 Storage, Student 100 300 Subtotal 958 2,674 SCIENCE 9 021 4.8 Intetmed/Mid Sci Lab 1,122 10,098 22 198 9 808 Storage, Material 100 900 9 812 Storage, Project 150 1,350 Subtotal 1,372 12,348 RESOURCE - REGULAR 5 040 PK -12 Resource Room 390 1,950 10 Subtotal 390 1,950 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION 2 061 PK -12 ESE Part-time 858 1,716 15 30 Subtotal 858 1,716 2 052 PK -12 ESE Full -time 858 1,716 10 20 1 817 RR and Bath, Student 110 110 Subtotal 968 1,826 1 064 N -PK ESE PT /OT 475 475 5 0 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 813 Storage; Student 40 40 1 817 RR and Bath. Student 110, 110 1 Subtotal 725 725 ART 1 051 4-8 IntennediatelNliddle 1,260 1,260 30 30 1 805 Kiln 60 80 1 BOB Storage, Material 100 100 1 812 Storage, Project 150 150 Subtotal 1,570 1,570 1 1 MUSIC 1 076 6 -12 Band Classroom 2,000 2,000 40 40 1 830 Ensemble 300 300 2 831 Practice Room(s) 70 140 1 832 Storage, Instrument 600 600 1 836 Storage, Sheet Music 150 150 Subtotal 3,120 3,190 Page 1 Middle School Facility List I H District: Collier Total Stations 1,196 Gross Sq Ft: 153,003 May -09 $20,616 Cost per stu sta $24,656,736 Level: Middle 6 -8 Student Capacity 1,076 Utilization: 90% 13 Aorea Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. FISH - - - -- -• -- CAPACITY STATIONS SPACE:CODE - DESCRIPTION- __ UNIT . TOTAL., .. PERUNIT.... UTILIZED. _._ ... .. .. ... 1 075 6 -12 Vocal Classroom 1,425 1,425 25 25 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 830 Ensemble 300 300 2 831 Practice Rbom(s) 70 140 Subtotal 1,895 1,965 1 077 6 -12 Orchestra Classroom 1,425 1,425 25 25 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 2 831 Practice Room(s) 70 140 1 B32 Storage,lnstrument 600 600 Subtotal 2,195 2,265 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 1 111 6-9 Gymnasium Floor 5,800 5,800 80 80 2 0901091 6 -12 Dressing Room 646 1,292 2 0921093 Lockers 108 215 2 094%095 Showers 108 215 2 815/816 Restroom 108 215 2 0981897 Drying Area 108 215 2 0991100 Teacher ToilettShower 66 132 1 098 PE Storage 484 484 1 110 Multipurpose 1,050 1,050 1 114 Laundry/towel 108 108 1 115 Fast Aid 108 108 1 119 Gymnastics B Dance 1,050 1,050 1 120 Gym. Storage 360 300 2 822!823 Public Toilets 108 216 Subtotal 10,150 11,400 1 1 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 1 1 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1 210 6 -9 Orientation/Exploration Le 1,210 1,210 22 22 1 808 Storage, Material 100. too Subtotal 1,310 1,310 1 1 FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES 1 no 6 -9 Orientation/EZploration Le 1,540 1,540 22 22 1 808 Storage, Material 250 250 1 812 Storage, Project 150 150 1 852 Technology Resource Boo 800 Subtotal 1 2,740 2,740 1 1 TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION - 1 240 6 -9 Ortentation/Explomtion Le 2,090 2,090 22 22 1 806 Storage, Material 100 100 1 649 Storage, Project 310 310 1 851 Storage, Tool 310 310 1 852 Technology Resource 800 800 Subtotal 3,610 3,610 1 1 HEALTH OCCUPATIONS EDUCATION 1 250 6 -9 Orientation /Exploration Le 1,012 1,012 22 22 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 Subtotal 1,112 1,112 Page 2 Middle School Facility Ust (_l !I l fl District: Collier Total Stations 1,196 Gross Sq Ft: 153,003 May -09 $20,616 Costperstusta $24,656,736 Level: Middle 6 -8 Student Capacity 1,076 Utilitatlon: 90% 13 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. FISH -• -- • - - -- CAPACITY STATIONS SPACE9CODE. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT UTILIZED MEDIA CENTER 1 380 P -PS Reading Room /Stacks 3,981 3981 1 381 P -PS Technical Processing 430 430 1 382 P -PS Prod.Professidnal Lib. 430 430 1 383 P-PS A -V Storage/Repair 648 646 1 384 P -PS Periodical Storage 215 215 1 385 P -PS C.C.Televislon/Stor 753 753 1 386 P -PS C.C.T.V.Stcrage 538 538 1 387 P -PS Media Production Lab 538 538 1 391 P -PS Maintenance Repair _ ,108 108 Clinic 323 Subtotal 7,639 7639 ADMINISTRATION 1 300 N -PS PdncipalW' Dir Office 250 250 6 301 N -PS Asst Pdn/Other Office 175 1050 1 302 N -PS Bobkkeeping Office 125 125 1 303 N -PS Secretarial Space 158 158 1 304 N-PS Admin. Reception 915 915 1 305 N -PS ProductlonfWorkroom 430 430 1 305 N -PS Conference Rooms 753 753 1 307 N -PS Clinic 323 323 1 308 N -PS Admin. Storage 538 538 1 309 N -PS Recbrda(Vault 323 323 1 310 N -PS School Store 108 108 1 311 N -PS Student Activities Ared 538 538 1 312 N -PS CompuierAre'a 161 161 1 313 N -PS Careers Room 323 323 5 314 N -PS Itinerant OMce 125 625 1 315 N -PS Teacher Planning Area 2,152 2152 1 316 N -PS Teacher Lounge/Dlhing 430 430 1 819 -821' P -PS Toilets, Staff (M & F) 430 430 Subtotal 8,257 9632 FOOD SERVICE 1 340 N -PS Dining 4,304 4304 1 341 N -PS Kitchen 3,000 3000 1 349 N-PS Chair Storage 215 215 1 351 Covered Dining 1,200 600 Subtotal 8,719 8119 1 363 N -PS 1 364 N -PS 1 365/366 N -PS 1 367 N -PS 1 1 1 361 N -PS 1 362 N -PS Page 3 STAGE Stage Storage Dressing (M & F) Control Booth Subtotal MULTIPURPOSE Multipurpose Room Chair Storage Subtotal 990 990 538 538 538 538 100 100 2,166 2166 3,336 3336 215 215 3,551 3551 Middle School Facility List District: Collier Total Stations 1,196 Gross Sq Ft: 153,003 i May -09 $20,616 Cost per stu sta $24,656,736 Level: Middle 6-8 Student Capacity 1,076 Utilization: 90% (� 13 Acres lZecommended(Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL Il NO. FISH CAPACITY STATIONS SPACE: CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL. . PER UNIT. UTILIZED . (� OTHER SPACES 1 368 N -PS Textbook Storage 377 377 2 8151816 Student Toilet 807 1614 2 8221823 Public Toilets 108 216 Subtotal 1,292 2207 _ I) CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Receiving 1,614 1614 1 333 11-PS Flammable Storage 155 155 1 334 N-PS, Equipment Storage 5011 500 Subtotal 2,269 2269 li LI (I i Page 4 Middle School Facility List PI District: Collier Total Stations 1,957 Gross Sq Ft: 290,148 May -09 $26,779 Cost per stu sta $52,406,503 Level: High 9-12 Student Capacity 1,859 Utilization: 90% 29 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL MG. FISH -_ -- -..__ CAPACITY STATIONS sencas CODE . DESORIRTIO,N .. UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT, UTILIZED, GRAND TOTALS 204,272 1,957 STANDARD CLASSROOMS 28 003 9 -12 Senior High Classroom 800 22,400 25 700 30 808 Storage, Material 100 3,000 Subtotal —gip 25,400 1 704 K -12 Detention Classroom 600 600 20 20 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 815 Toilet, Student -Male 45 45 1 816 Toilet, Sfudent- Female 45 45 Subtotal 790 —790 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB 10 012 9 -12 Senior High Shills Labs 800 8,000, 25 250 10 808 Storage, Student 100 1,000 Subtotal 900 9,000 SCIENCE 8 023 942 Senior High Sci Lao 1,275 10,200 25 200 8 808 Storage, Material 100 600 6 812 Storage, Project _ 150 1,200 Subtotal 1,525 12,200 R.O.T.C. 1 708 9.12 J.R.O.T.C. Classroom 1,050 1,050 25 25 1 800 Anus Room 15o 150 1 802 Conference 225 225 1 808 Storage, Material 155 155 Subtotal 1,580 1,580 RESOURCE - REGULAR 8 040 PK -12 Resource Room 290 2,320 10 8 808 Storage, Material 100 800 Subtotal 390 3,120 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION 4 061 PK -12 ESE Part-time 975 3,900 15 60 Subtotal 975 3,900 3 062 PK -12 ESE Full -time 950 2,850 10 30 1 BOB Storage, Material 100 100 1 813 Storage, Student 40 40 1 817 RR and Bath, Student 110 110 Subtotal 1,200 3,100 Page 1 High School Facility List I II fI [l I I I� II I I I� U I -1 l I. I l I� District: Collier Total Stations 1,957 Gross Sq Ft: 290,148 May -09 $26,779 Cost per stu sta $52,406,503 Level: High 9.12 Student Capacity 1,859 Utilization: 90% 29 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL FISH - -• -- - - -- CAPACITY STATIONS Na SPACES coos DESCRIPTION . . .. UNIT , TOTAL. PEk UNIT UTILIZED 1 063 N -12 ESE Vocational 1,140 1,140 12 12 1 808 Storage, Student 100 100 1 817 RR and Bath, Student 110 110 1 816 Toilet, Student- Female 60. 60 Subtotal 1,410 1,410 3 065 PKA2 ESE Resource Room 380 1,140 4 0 3 808 Storage, Material 100 300 3 813 Storage, Student 40 120 Subtotal 520 1,560 4 066 PK -12 Supplementary Instruction 100 400 2 0 4 808 Storage, Material 100 400 Subtotal 200 800 ART 3 052 6.8 Senior High 1,484 4,452 28 84 1 803 Darkroom 100 100 1 805 Kiln 60 60 3 808 Storage, Material 100 300 3 812 Storage, Project 160 450 Subtotal 1,894 5,362 MUSIC 1 076 6A2 Band Classroom 2,000 2,000 50 50 1 608 Reference 100 100 1 808 Storage, Material 200 200 1 830 Ensemble 300 300 2 831 Practice Room(s) 70 140 1 832 Storage, instrument 600 600 1 834 Uniform 300 300 1 836 Storage, Sheet Music 150 150 1 837 Storage, Large Equipme 400 400 Subtotal 4,120 4,190 1 077 B-12 Orchestra Classroom 1,596 1,596 28 28 1 806 Reference 100 100 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 830 Ensemble 300 300 1 831 Practice Rooms) 70 70 1 832 Storage,lnstrument 600 600 - Subtotal 2,766 2,766 1 078 6 -12 General Music Classroom 1,036 1,036 28 28 1 BOB Storage, Material 100 100 1 832 Storage, instrument 600 600 Subtotal 1,736 1,736 Page 2 High School Facility List h District: Collier Total Stations 1,957 Gross Sq Ft: 290,148 May -09 $26,779 Costperstusta $52,406,503 Level: High 9.12 Student Capacity 1,859 Utilization: 90% 29 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL . No. FISH - - - -• - - -•• CAPACITY STATIONS srecgq 000E,.,. _ pESCR1P7TON, UNIT _TOTAL _PER UNIT ;UTILIZED PHYSICAL EDUCATION 1 112 9 -12 Gymnasium Floor 6,500 6,500 160 160 2 0901091 6 -12 Dressing Room 1,115 2,230 2 0921093 Lockers 186 372 2 094/095 Showers 186 372 2 8151816 Restroom 186 372 2 096!097 Drying Area 186 372 2 0991100 Teacher Toilet/Shower 66 132 1 098 PE Storage 837 837 1 110 MuMpurpose 1,050 1,050 1 113 Gym Seating 5,949 5,949 1 114 Lauhdryltowel 186 186 1 115 First Aid 186 186 1 116 Training Room & whidp 250 250 1 117 Weight Room 1,000 1,000 1 116 Wrestling Room 1,680 1,680 1 119 Gymnastics & Dance 1,050 1,050 1 120 Gym. Storage 300 300 1 370 Lobby 930 930 1 371 Concessions 200 200 1 372 Ticket booth 30 30 2 822/923 Public Toilets _ 186 372 Subtotal 22,259 24,370 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION BUSINESS EDUCATION 2 2112 9 -PS Education Lab 2,190 4,380 30 60 2 808 Storage, Material 100 200 2 812 Storage, Project 159 360 Subtotal 2,440 4,880 0 0 DISTRIBUTIVE AND DIVERSIFIED EDUCATION 2 222 9 -PS Small Education Lab 1,125 2,250 25 50 0 808 Storage, Material 0 0 2 812 Storage, Project 150 300 2 840 Classroom for Related h 850 1,700 Subtotal 2,125 4,250 FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES 1 231 9 -12 Practical Ezpedehce Lab 1,920 1,920 30 30 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 842 Kitchen 125 125 1 843 Laundry 50 50 1 852 Technology Resource 800 800" Subtotal 2,995 2,995 1 233 9 -PS Medium Education Lab 2,070 2,070 30 30 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 842 Kitchen 125 125 1 843 Laundry 50 50 1 852 Technology Resource 800 800 Subtotal 3,145 3,145 Page 3 High School Facility List District: Collier Total Stations 1,957 Gross Sq Ft: 290,148 May -09 $26,779 Cost per Stu sta $52,406,503 Level: High 9 -12 Student Capacity 1,859 Utilization: 90% 29 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL No. FISH CAPAC17Y STATIONS spncFs,._ cogr:, „_. _... .. (2E$.C$IPTION .UNIT ... TOTAL.,PER UNIT. UTILIZED .. 1 TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION 1 241 9 -12 Small Education Lab 1,950 1,950 30 30 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 852 Technology Resource - 800 800 Subtotal 2,850 2,850 INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION 2 245 9-PS Medium Education Lab 2,700 5,400 30 60 2 808 Storage, Material 100 200 2 810 Storage, Material 395 790 2 840 Classroom, Related 1,020 2,040 2 849 Storage, Project 310 620 2 650 Storage, Tool 195 390 -I Subtotal 4,720 9,440 HEALTH OCCUPATIONS EDUCATION _ 1 252 9 -PS Small Education Lab 1,600 1,800 30 30 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 812 Storage, Project 150 150 1 840 Classroom Related 1.1,020 1,020 �-j Subtotal 3,070 3,070 , II 0 g PUBLIC SERVICE EDUCATION 1 283 9 -PS Medium Education Lab 1,300 1,300 20 20 1 810 Storage, Material 395 395 Il 1 846 Classroom for Related h 680 680 Subtotal 2,375 2,375 I MEDIA CENTER 1 360 P -PS Reading RooiNStacks 6,878 6,878 1 1 381 P -PS Technical Processing 744 744 1 392 P -PS Prod.Professidnai Hit. 744 744 1 383 F,-P15, A -V s1drage 1,115 1,115 1 38$ 15 -08 Periodical Storage 372 372 1 385 P-PS O.C.Tejevistan 1,301 1,301 1 388 P -PS C.C.T.V.Sforage 930 930 1 387 P -PS Media Production Lab 930 930 1 388 P -PS Copying Room 372 372 1 369 P -PS Small Group Listening 186 186 1 390 P -PS Group Projects 930 930 1 391 P -PS Maintenance Repair 186 186 11 Subtotal 14,688 14,688 ADMINISTRATION 1 300 N -PS Principai'slDir Office 250 250 I_ 17 301 N -PS Asst PflNOther Office 175 2,975 1111 1 302 N -PS bookkeeping Office, 125 125 6 303 N -PS Secretarial Space 158 948 1 304 N -PS Admin. Reception 1.580 1,580 1 305 N -Ps Production/Workroom 744 744 1 306 N -PS Conference Rooms 1,301 1,301 1 307 N -PS Clinic 558 558 1 308 N -Ps Admin. Storage 930 930 High School Facility List Page 4 III District: Collier Total Stations 1,957 Gross Sq Ft: 290,148 May -09 $26,779 Cost per stu sta $52,406,503 Level: High 9.12 Student Capacity 1,859 Utilization: 90/ fff I 29 Acres Recommended (Min) NETSQUAREFEET DESIGN TOTAL No. FISH CAPACITY STATIONS SPAQES. , CODE. DESCRIPTION ,TOTAL „PER UN...IT. UTILIZED r I 1 1 309 N -PS RecordslVault 558 558 1 310 N-PS School Store 186 186 1 311 N -PS Student Activities Area 930 930 1 312 I4416 Compular Area 279 279 1 l 313 N -PS Caieers Room 558 558 5 314 N -PS Itinerant Office 125 625 1 315 N -PS Teacher Planning Area 3,716 3,718 1 316 N -PS Teacher Lounge/Dining 744 744 (� 2 819-821'P-PS Toflets, Staff (M & F) 372 744 Subtotal 13,291 17,753 FOOD SERVICE 1 340 N -PS Dining 7,436 7,436 1 341 N -PS Kitchen 6,100 6,100 1 349 N -PS Chair Storage 372 372 1 351 N -PS Covered Patio 6,692 6,642 Subtotal 20,600 20,600 AUDITORIUM 1 360 641S Auditorium Seating 5,577 5,577 .' 1 370 6 -PS Lobby 930 930 1 371 6 -PS Concessions 200 200 1 372 6 -PS Ticket Booth 30 30 Subtotal 6,737 6,737 STAGE 1 363 N -PS Stage 990 990 1 364 N -PS Storage 930 930 I 1 36$!366 N -PS Dressing (M & F) 930 930 l 1 367 N -PS Control Booth 100 100 1 Subtotal 2,950 2,950 1 • OTHER SPACES 1 368 N45S Textbook Storage 651 651 111 2 8151810 Student Toilet 1,394 2,788 2 8221823 Public Tollets 186 372 Subtotal 2,231 3,811 CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Recelving 2,789 2,789 1 333 N-PS Flammable Storage 155 155 —J 1 334 N -PS Equipment Storage _ 500 500 111 Subtotal 3,444 3,444 Page 5 High School Facility List District: CollierJL Walker Total Stations 600 Gross Sq Ft: 72,024 Level: High 9.12 Student Capacity 450 utilization: 75% 9 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. FISH - -- -- -- CAPACITY STATIONS SPACES GoaE DESCRIPTION _.,,. ,UNIT _ „TOTAL PE.RUNIT. UTILIZED GRAND TOTALS 50,707 600 STANDARD CUISSROOMS 16 003 9 -12 Senior High Classroom 800 14,400 25 450 18 608 Storage, Material 100 1,800 Subtotal 900 16,200 SCIENCE 4 023 9 -12 Senior High Sci Lab 1,275 5,100 25 100 4 808 Storage, Material 100 400 4 812 Storage, Project 150 600 Subtotal 1,525 6,100 RE90URCE- REGULAR 2 040 PK -12 Resource Room 290 580 10 2 808 Storage, Material 100 200 Subtotal 390 780 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 2 0901091 6.12 Dressing Room 500 1,000 2 0921093 Lockers 45 90 2 0941095 Showers 45 90 2 8151816 Restroom 45 90 2 0961697 Drying Area 45 90 2 o99H0o Teacher Toilet/Showet 66 132 1 093 PE Storage 203 203 1 110 Multipurpose 1,050 1,050 1 117 Weight Room 1,000 1,000 Subtotal 2,999 3,745 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 2. 243 9 -12 Large Education Lab 3,375 6,750 25 50 2 808 Storage, Material 100 200 2 810 Storage, Material 395 790 2 849 Storage, Project 310 620 2 851 Storage, Tool 310 620 2 852 Technology Resource 800 1,600 Subtotal 5,290 10,580 MEDIA CENTER 1 380 P -PS Reading RoonJStacks 1,665 1,665 1 381 P-PS Technical Processing 180 180 District: CollierJL Welker Total Stations 600 Gross Sq Ft: 7AO24 Level: Nigh 9 -12 - Student Capacity 450 Utilization: 75% 9 Acres Recommended (Min) NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO. FISH —••— - -- CAPACITY STATIONS r -1 I SPACES, coOg,. _. _DESCRIPTION UNIT ,TOTAL pigg UNtT UTILRED„ _. Ill 1 383 P -PS A -V Storage 270 270 f 1 390 P -PS Group Projects 225 225 Subtotal 2,340 2,340 ADMINISTRATION f 1 300 N-PS Principal's/Dir Office 250 250 l 4 301 N-PS Asst PrlNOther Office 175 700 1 302 N -PS Bookkeeping Office 125 125 1 303 N -PS Secretarial Space 158 158 nnn I 1 364 N -PS Admin. Reception 383 383 ' I 1 305 N -PS PioductlonM/orkroom 180 180 1 306 N -PS Conference Rooms 315 315 j 1 367 N -PS Clinic 135 135 1 308 N -PS Admin. Storage 225 225 1 309 N -PS RecordslVault 135 135 1 313 N -PS Careers Room 135 135 _ 1 315 N -PS Teacher Planning Area 125 125 1 819-821'1`4P9 Toilets, Staff (M & F) 180 180 Subtotal 2,521 3,046 � FOOD SERVICE 1 340 N -PS Dining 1,800 1,800 1 341 N -PS I(Itchen 1,980 1,980 - �_. 1 349 N -PS Chair Storage 90 90 1 351 N -PS. Cdvered Patio 1,620 1,620 Subtotal 3,870 3,870 MULTIPURPOSE 1 361 N =PS Multipurpose Room 1,395 1,395 1 362 N -PS Chair Storage 90 90 Subtotal 1,485 1,485 OTHER SPACES 2 _ 815/816 Student Togo 338 676 �—� Subtotal 338 676 CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Recelving 675 675 1 333 N -PS Flammable Storage 100 100 1 334 N -PS Equipment Storage 300 300 I Subtotal 1,075 1,075 i �I I� II l_1 (l II N �.I l District Adult Ed Center Total Stations 440 Gross Sq Ft: 115,442 4,000 Immokaiee 100 500 Level: Adult 900 Student Capacity 660 Utllizaticn: 150% NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL Ho. RSH Storage, Matbral -- - -- CAPACITY STATIONS srnpgs cone ��- .:..__ .,pES�glq;�q.N,...... .._.....,...U.NIY.. TOI L.: P.F,ii R.._Ui1L17fR.. .. . .................. ... GRAND TOTALS 81,274 440 5 012 9 -12 5 808 2 040 PK -12 2 808 2 090/0916 -12 2 092/093 2 094%095 2 8151816 1 096/097 1 099/100 1 098 1 110 1 117 3 203 9-P3 3 806 3 810 3 818 3 840 3 847 3 848 3 851 2 211 9.12 2 808 2 812 Page 1 of 4 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT LAB Senior High Skills Labs 800 4,000 Storage, Student 100 500 Subtotal 900 4,500 RESOURCE- REGULAR Resource Room 290 580 Storage, Matbral 100 200 Subtotal 390 780 PHYSICAL EDUCATION Dressing Room 500 1,000 Lockers 33 66 Stowers 33 66 Restroom 33 66 Drying Area 250 250 Teacher Toilet/Shower 66 56 PE Storage 149 149 Muldpaposs 1,050 1,050 Weight Room ,1,000 .1,009 Subtotal 3,114 3,713 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION Medium Education Lab 1,600 4,800 Reference 100 300 Storagb, Material 395 1,185 Lockers, R/R, Showers - 450 1,350 Classroom for Related 1 675 2,025 Storage, Flammable 125 375 Storage, Machinery 1,100 3,300 Storage, Tool 310 930 Subtotal 4,755 14,265 BUSINESS EDUCATION Practical Experience Lab 1,550 3,100 Storage, Material 100 200 Storage, Project 150 300 Subtotal 1,800 3,600 25 125 10 20 60 25 50 Immokakee Adult Ed Facility List II District: Adult Ed Center Total Stations 440 Gross Sci Ft: 115,442 Immokalee Level: Adult Student Capacity 660 Utilization: 150% NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL NO' sw —• - -• -- CAPACITY STATIONS Awes, cow , ... ., DESCRIPTION UNIT .TOOTAL„ t'94 UNIT, . UTILIZE'U FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES 2 234 9 -PS Large Education Lab 1,700 3,400 20 40 2 812 Storage, Project 150 300 2 813 Student Storage 40 60 2 842 Kitchen 125 250 2 843 Laundry 50 100 2 852 Technology Resource 800 1,600 Subtotal 2,865 5,730 TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION 1 243 9-12 Large Education Lab 3,375 3,375 25 25 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 810 Storage, Material 395 395 1 849 Storage, PmJect 310 310 1 851 Storage, Tool 310 310 1 852 Technology Resoume 800 800 Subtotal 5,290 5,290 INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION 1 245 9-P5 Medium Education Lab 1,860 1,806 20 20 1 808 Storage, Material 100 lob 1 810 Storage, Material 395 395 1 840 Classroom, Related 675 675 1 849 Storage, Project 310 310 1 850 Storage, Tool 195 105 Subtotal 3,475 3,475 2 246 9 -P$ Large Education Lab 4,000 8,060 20 40 2 806 Storage, Material 100 200 2 810 Storage, Material 395 790 2 840 Classroom, Related 675 1,350 2 847 Storage, Flammable 125 250 2 849 Storage, Project 310 620 2 850 Storage, Tool 195 390 Subtotal 5,800 11,600 Page 2 of 4 Immokakee Adult Ed Facility List I H District: Adult Ed Center Total Stations 440 Gross Sq Ft: 115,442 Immokalee Level: Adult Student Capacity 660 Utilization: 150% NET SQUARE FEET DESIGN TOTAL No. sw —•– ---- CAPACITY STATIONS sp,s cone .,l)ESC131pLQN.,,, ..... UNIT rQTAL, ,PER:IJNIT. UTILIZED.. HEALTH OCCUPATIONS EDUCATION 4 253 9 -PS Medium Education Lab 2,200 8,800 20 80 4 804 Dispensary 135 540 4 806 Reference 100 400 4 608 Storage, Material 100 400 4 810 Storage, Material 395 1,580 4 812 Storage, Project 150 600 4 840 Classroom for Related 1 675 2,700 4 849 Storage, Project 310 1,240 Subtotal 4,065 16,260 VOCATIONAL RESOURCE SPACE - 1 270 9 -PS Work Evaluation Lab 1,110 1,110 15 1 810 Storage, Material 395 395 1 853 Tasting 250 250 Subtotal 1,755 1,755 1 271 9-PS Viol Lab 705 705 15 1 802 Conference 225 225 1 808 Storage, Material 100 100 1 840 Classroom for Related 1 675 675 1 846 Reception 90 90 1 853 Testing 260 250 Subtotal 2,045 2,045 MEDIA CENTER 1 380 P -PS Reading Room/Slacks 800 600 1 381 P -PS TecHnical Processing 132 132 1 383 P -PS A -V Storage 198 198 Subtotal 1,130 1,130 ADMINISTRATION 1 300 N -PS Principal's /Dir Office 250 250 5 301 N -PS Asst Prin /Other Office 175 875 1 302 N -PS Bookkeeping Office 125 125 - 4 303 N -PS Secretarial Space 158 632 1 304 N-PS Admin. Reception 281 281 1 305 N -PS Ptoduction/Wdrkroom 132 132 1 - 306 N -PS Conference Rooms 231 231 1 308 N-PS Admin. Storage 165 165 1 309 N -PS Records/Vault 99 99 1 310 N -PS School Store 33 33 1 311 N -PS Student Activities Area 165 165 1 312 N -PS Computer Area 50 50 Page 3 of 4 Immokskee Adult Ed Facility List I 11 11 I.) [l I� District: Adult Ed Center Total Stations 440 Gross $q Ft: 115,442 Immokalee Level: Adult Student Capacity 660 Utilization: 150% NET SQUARE FEET DeSIGN TOTAL ho. FISH --- - -- CAPACITY STATIONS 1e41 cone _ PENR1P7ION , UNIT R AmIT_,. ULI_LIYED 1 313 N -PS Careers Room 99 99 1 315 N -PS Teacher Planning Area 660 660 1 819 -821' P -PS Toilets, Staff (M & F) 132 132 Subtotal 2,755 3,929 F000 SERVICE 1 340 N -PS Dining 1,320 1,320 - Subtotal 1,320 1,320 OTHER SPACES 1 368 N -PS Textbook Storage 116 110 2 8151816 Student Toilet 248 496 2 822/823 Public Toilets 60 120 Subtotal 424 732 CUSTODIAL 1 330 N -PS Custodial Deceiving 495 495 1 333 N-PS Flammable Storage 155 155 1 334 N -PS Equipment Storage 500 500 Subtotal 1,150 1,150 Page 4 of 4 Immokakee Adult Ed Facility List District: COLLIER Projected COFTE: 52,757 Survey - Out Year 2011 -12 _ ANCILLARY ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT - 38% 400 Superintendent 200 401 Conference Room 100 402 Superintendents Secretary -1 403 Ancillary Secretarial /Clerical Offices 404 Ancillary Reception Area - 100 405 Vault 100 406 Assistant Superintendent 180 r 407 Ancillary Administrative Offices 100 408 Business Operations 409 Terminal Storage Area 410 School Plant Planning 411 Word Processing Center 412 Personnel Services 413 Central Reproduction and Copy 414 Central Administrative Supply - � 415 Mail Room 417 Central Security 418 Ancillary Administrative Storage 419 Ancillary Flammable Storage 420 Bbard Meeting Room 500 421 Ancillary Staff Lounge 200 422 Main Lobbly and Switchboard 424 Director's Office 425 Assistant Directots Office 426 General Office 427 Staff Development/ Instructional 428 CtherAncMary Adihinistraffve Support . Subtotals 100,238 CUSTODIAL -2% I 416 Ancillary Custodial Services Subtotals 5,276 ANCILLARY COMPUTER/DATA CENTER 2% 500 Pmgr4mmer Room 501 Data Processing Technical Area _ 502 Data Processing Equipment 503 Computer (Raised Floor) 504 Off -Line Equipment Room ( 505 Ancillary Computer Storage Il i Subtotals 5,276 ANCILLARY SUPPORT FACILITIES - 50% l 510 Warehouse 515 Central Kitchen Page 1 of 2 Ancillary Facility List I1 ANCILLARY MEDIA SERVICES - 9% 600 Library Wbmhduse / Stacks 601 Reference 602 Professional Library 603 Periodical / Journal Services 804 Central Media Processing 605 Audio Visual Equipment 606 Closed Circuit TV Laboratory e07 Closed Cicu8 Support 608 Media Prod6c86n Laboratory" 609 Media Copying Room 610 Media Maintenance / Repair 611 Ancillary Media Storage 612 Oilier AnclOary Media Space, Subtotals 21,103 Total Net Square Feet Plus 6% Net Square Feet Subtotal Net Square Feet Plus 34% Net Square Feet Total Gross Square Feet 263,786 + .15,827 279,613 + 95,068 374,681 Page 2 of 2 Ancillary Facility List RECOMMENDED FISH MINIMUM TOTAL NET ,# DESCRIPTION NSF SPACE 520 Carpentry Shop 525 Glazing Shop 530 Masonry Shop 535 Small Engine Shop 540 Electronics Shop 545 Electrical Shop 550 Machine Shop 555 Plumbing Shop 560 Paint Shop 565 Welding Shop 570 Air CoddiSoning 575 Carpet Shop 580 Locksmith Shop 585 Garage Parts Room 586 Machine Shop 587 Glass / Upholstery Shop 588 Body Shop 589 paint / Flammable Storage 590 Paint Bay 800 591 Tire Storage and Mounting 592 Work Bay 800 593 Drivers' Clasrobm 400' 594 Ancillary Support Storage Subtotals 131,893 ANCILLARY MEDIA SERVICES - 9% 600 Library Wbmhduse / Stacks 601 Reference 602 Professional Library 603 Periodical / Journal Services 804 Central Media Processing 605 Audio Visual Equipment 606 Closed Circuit TV Laboratory e07 Closed Cicu8 Support 608 Media Prod6c86n Laboratory" 609 Media Copying Room 610 Media Maintenance / Repair 611 Ancillary Media Storage 612 Oilier AnclOary Media Space, Subtotals 21,103 Total Net Square Feet Plus 6% Net Square Feet Subtotal Net Square Feet Plus 34% Net Square Feet Total Gross Square Feet 263,786 + .15,827 279,613 + 95,068 374,681 Page 2 of 2 Ancillary Facility List c O U L. U O L. fo O m O O U U) _U .L 4-J V) � a Q) a� L 0 0) fa r�1 I II N 00 O U. 0 _fu N ^^ N • E o °' Q1 O L m Q @ E n H U fu Q U N N O O Y aboard Qj ODD co N I O g u r d C N V U T � a 7 z Z 7 O U w Q W -� OCU N N ._ayn LL U Q E D co 062 = 0 O O = m N m Q T f0 j cu L) _j O� a Q U m c O�ma'c_m U N N C L m L J U d 0 Y U N 0 w F MR c 0 0 U _LD O C `03 -p T m L O � m N c o L O c T m y E L M F- m > 'O LL aa_Ni a a O N C �o L Q O CL am N L F `m CD O U U > N m iE O U E ° m E `o E N F- C) O Q m V 6 C O C co U N 'C a m N 0 o LY '.N-.. UO IL U U% N N N J N m Z C N N F C E O c C ►q d T U d m LL C = O N O oo V O d a E z z r O U X W dU d O t 5 � � m � O V � m w n E y O O `o O VJ E n p V V � 0 O U ? E � O � O ti O p � U C ti ti � w o ate@ mna �O' m M A m a'm0 Nn '0am E �U o, � N � U 6cm maw > V N V xym W`ct ? m °a =y om ti a2v o Urn ° E o P o ) y pv 3`cp yg2 v� E Q o uN V oo¢ �`m a Q r U N tp0 cm mQ m> �m =m O ~ V LL NOm O k Q q `u °ft2 ` D O ) O Cjp�N a =ate ;.g min Lvm>. oW�U m °u-6 d� y ° 3`c mm C n ON` �o12 cm OU�t 1 p ¢~ i =o U � j f � Q O 1N Pry 0 U O Q 3 c t ti o ate@ mna �O' m M A m a'm0 Nn '0am E �U o, � N � U 6cm maw > V N V xym W`ct ? m °a =y om ti a2v o Urn ° E o P o ) y pv 3`cp yg2 v� E Q o uN V oo¢ �`m a Q r U N tp0 cm mQ m> �m =m O ~ V LL NOm O k Q q `u °ft2 ` D O ) O Cjp�N a =ate ;.g min Lvm>. oW�U m °u-6 d� y ° 3`c mm C n ON` �o12 cm OU�t 1 p ¢~ i =o U � j f � Q O 1N Pry 0 `m am0 C m � c c 0 'C T d F E d � Z ? 4 m v 0 4 x � C � v "v lti z 4 ` y � p 9. z d 4.l U � q r _ d U r N 0 c m O N m O O O O ` m O y a) d O O �O O: E YO _ ° w N L m E 0 0 0 0 0 N O E m m -O m o E N m C O L c 0" 0 0 3 c O O d N N O m O c G a) m 0 r m U c E m 0_ C .L... Q O yj CO 0 U 7 0_ m Co 0a)a m mCm o >, a is do�mam3 a) v 0 V E � v a) O m Ca U) m C m c m y '- cc O? Y 0 3 L 7 r F- G c O n F a) E � p O m d N 0 C N a Y V m@ co O L m T O ) 04 m LL CD m m 0 V N C a) c a) cv L 0 E C, .r C 0) E m v � CL a0 U m .T...L+ y E a m m L m O C) 7 0 m 7 m CO 4) 3 F- C C N O 0 i6 CO 0 a) N Y U a) a) a) L in .- i U a) c 5 c m� 0 V 0 U LL m O Q7 m a) 0- N a) y= r' m m 0).r C C 0 d N m an y 0 p 0 .Q O a O= E °- E d m c CL O C N m a U a) O. V- N —,6.2 E 0 m> O m '� 7 -f-- L-o E m` m`o N C m $ o 0) Y a E E a a o dQ 2 dU a a) -0 o aiS m C 7 `- me >mm O — 02- ONCE L0 '� a) Emc C m F z .�. d' Q m a) N a) c C O C Y 'm0 m E wow a��°0) O@ a�ci -0�0 CL :3 X07 E a) �p O a m O. U� m c m N 01 CO W:bN m�0 y7C_m E 0 0 U oEin Nis m a o m o U_ 0 m �' = a m e 0 a) ` O Y 0) r' O "0 0_ a) m r �Yr .. IIIIr�� yM v� Q? 0 0 0 dc2 E>_ > ° y pmcinmc Xym r c� �m w c E ca) o> C C nC w Z • ) 0 N _�o�a , T� C 0 E �' O v 5 •N a) 0ca C °m"0E - 0) = 7 O_ v -0 am - O EONU cd - c0a yE M F R Ca U c N ) -0 r- 0 �� N 0.2 V e� 11 01 E 0 c 0) 0` C a 0 0 0 rr m N )n 0) o u. ua C 7�`m c.�a)c a E a m 5 a) -0Caa0o a - w.`�o m EU O O } O �6 O O m m O Q) a) 0 N L N a7 Q V O d >> U O. U F- Nl E m L O E. C a) m q ENO "0 m N m 7 m O o 3 v V c U 1_ 3 0 N 3 _m N O U — min O c m l rL' m D 7 CO c m a) C y 0 '0 L 0 O d 00 � j C 00 Y T m 0 _ry U m. V O 0 m N O 0 c C O U C .0 0 N Y 4) O LL c O �a 0'L O O. 0 0 N w E0 c 3 i) cc m C m 0 7 m a).2co y° ME .E E E o - o m v m c o m v a o N -m0 c 3 0 > .3 N N " °) 00 I C''� c O..O y° C i6 c O y0 d U y lV4 0)` @ L N C �0c0 w w`oz o-0�4))� 0�°3 �° mU ay >. (D �•oa =9c0 C c � a) �o N a) > C 7 c y0 O` c d 0 0 m `° `° E Q7 D 0 0 O a) al O m L 0 o m e is m V m d d wm�_°-L> oQdF -�c7o 0 0Q Y a_ a) — a) 3 m - c N � m .=r N O U- m U C o g 4) m 0 j L m 2= c) 'C CL y m U m a E N "0 �. C C m L o `�° N n C L 0 - m v m u E° t 2° m� o rn o° s m o °o Com0Y o °°co =mL m=Nm �d c o0 3 mQ �` um 0)3 > 0 o 4) d (n cp 0) �_ E c� •0 )p rc a) m a) �j M C U LLj C T d N a) m N O lV0 .L.. U a1 m m O C C@ y N U '00 N N m C a F Cw S0 F > 0-u(n n0 F- F- mE —> (n `m am0 C m � c c 0 'C T d F E d � Z ? 4 m v 0 4 x � C � v "v lti z 4 ` y � p 9. z d 4.l U � q r _ d U U F" N j 0 N r S cm 0 C C N N NC O O 0 > CL C E uj m c �c 'o. c m m U a N T Q C 00 U O ` O N N � O U- U 0 o c m o E a E m 7 L U) U r � r N M m N O) C Z C m m E a E T 7 L U) N E o m � m O � E- a) N ° E N C E U o u) m a o � E a U E m CD C C (p N 'n E m m a U o N m W N N } O U N t LL LL In I I I N M cr Q) N C- m m L L L U U U (D pp ai E 0 LL c O m .a a N U N C C U N O C a` Z> I CL a L L U U c m 4. cu N c N F C m C F- I (D a m L i N O U C d CL a I tb 0) a m L A CL C- 22 N N N 0 0 O O L L U U U) U) L,= N 07 C = N N N F E O O m d N ' o ti LL C— .. X X a a a OL CL ¢ ¢ Q) !)}�� k 0 2 \ƒE - \ \( ` _- _ k / ■ § }( ®G \ ) \ 1 - {�{ % ` - -M 0 k) §c 2 & \( #«fe , ¥2[ §§ E« -��y{ { >&C I/ Z ]` �} \\ ���s , �k\ \E¥\ ® - �� ¥E ; / \\0 j\ kk > \} \ \�\\ p 0 ;» « {7 / �| ]} �_ \ \\ ))k )| $ \ �_ $ /r ■ a« oE)]7 0w 6/ .j £ ° 3 E M-M MCC ` - m /� #® ��� - « §7 § \\\ \ _ _ _ /«ZcE- Q� /) LU }�\ \\ #)� \ (\\ \/ /M- 0C E m 2 \( a) 0 o \ -0CUa) ®. -�- ���� M- CL » E2,M / � -- \i - ]kk§E/ ! - \\\ /\ \)0ID } ) W ._� a) cu = 2 _(L O ` ){ » /oZm, =m /#/ ` °°» §)%f \ //` [\ /E\ {2± falr , /{ j/ ,E «,tee ` _\ =�rEE& 0 a= &0 2 a) ƒ} ia) a I! Pa. z /M M 6 §)k Rk L cm 2 0– ^ -0 W \E O CL E lU T O cu E E C/) m G e o r N � o o O O °o N N 0 o e O r a m m o° g $ ° LLN N m co �o ° v a m, 06 m v v m o C= 0 0 U- O e U- LLO O m o � N N N ro $ N m N o e o m m W m m n o r Ir O v o o n$ r LLO O m cm-. utDi ° S o �i h yr (p N a6 o N n vi ei of o o ai N N W N N T (m0 V N O A n VW'1 m O V O � 'af C'J a"J m O _ tO n 1[J N T $ N (ND 'Q m M W p N }' w {np �Wp O O N 8 pq� m N imp C'> SS O O pr pO n N th m m N W Yn'! W m Of S tm0 H `8 M h vNi LL N CJ I N W N N m m O r O$$ p) n r S n O O$ S O Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N C d 0 r N C O E m C N C O C O h O O C O E y w d c G yf is o CD • CD � N C O N W C L CL d y AL w p a> °n T O w °° ° o d ¢ E c E c g o v y w E ¢ 10 7 G (O N E E o w a z _ E u U y ^n c m �E m w N O c ~ d oN o y E E E rn E = ° c m m m W m " 2 m E x 49 m a n w w x w Z U y y m G 3 z e O� v O N Co O N O n n O N N O O O C r N O N O N O m m O O f7 c H O g O U. O O °e v $ S M M o n N a N N S °o S i t 0 o v c po o p e LL O O n n c� m �i v S n m in en n Q rn w� N N m e n M v N 0 M M ll n Q N q °o_ o °e n v } O rNi o o m O {L O O n �[J N N a7 Q� O O h O O N_ Y°3 m N co va o 0 o g o e e a o O e o o m S m m D o °o °o e °e cNj Clt O O O O Yf N O O A O O O O N O� m fC CR O_ O O O n (D b n CL O O O LL O O m <O M �? t0 O Q N O] m m O O_ N N N n V - tD t"J N S O O O O O O S O S O O O O n O O n O N O p T O N O O O O S O O O O Sm O S O O O O O A N N O O O O O Q VJ Cl m S N m O O O C9 O m Cf O O O O O {L O O 4J f N t0 < Q O O O n $ n O n n O O m n m N N N A (O N N n N N Q N t0 N N f N N f M p mQ S 8 pp S S 8 lO W m_ I� O Q � 10 VprynJ N O O O mA 8O 8O 8S SO ryry� 8O l 8@ qS Q pO pO O O O O A N (7 O N° FN . {[�O M m N N O N Q m ^ tO m H m 0 n LL N O cm o w °o 0 0 Q3 N N N C 0) CL O m a 9 E i H c a v O LL . m v N E O A A i C a U m m E O W v ti Ti o c O m c a 0 L m t a a Q 0 A v d U m a C w U N E d m o c O 7 a? m w o c a E u g w C C E E = t0 m H 01 o K m c O y aVi c E w c in y M N L y a C H x O .92 E a 2 ¢ g m m x z z FL 'w vi o V x h h N N> e t in x o x ii x x o o. LL LL o w co N N 3 z e O� v 3q e a r N N O O O �O A M A O) O O O O O O O H S r r O O m O O N 01 � p (D N p N N O O ¢ N C:. t0 �- N A M N M N N A Q (O N N t0 S S i0 S S O O m S m N O Cl O O OM! O O O V O O O O N O O N O N LL O N m V N N O r th Of N ° M S g A °o O r Ci o o o m N oo_ g o° n oo vmi Y m .•i L o vn m r C- r m A Ot+� O o o m o m LL O O S N N M yOj N^ m tG ^ N fG O O O O N S N C-4 Of N m O O V S YO'1 O O O [O m O O C1 O O O S S N O IA O O N (D O O O O Nm M O O W m m O O O N O O O b e V S gy[O pp p N O O LL 40 N N a q D d d 4O O T O lfJ O O N N S N m O A O tD N N Ci O O O N m C; N N u> A O N N O O O O 0 0 O O O 00 O S S O O O M I- N O Q O tO O V m �0 S m ry S S N 4L O O m N O_ N M �O S N S V q S S N YOf O N m O N N Omj O m` m O N S O pp N SN O A t0 S p �p O A sspn{{ S t p p poO S ppS_ SO L'i O SS ppO " (O fV Q fN0 O O V lc 1` oS O� O O YJ {�y OI �NJ O tN0 O N l0 V W N O t0 M Q S N th N IF O LL 1N GO ^ N f00 d N Q N O E d i q `m $ d r m O LL LL YI O C w O 0 11 °o °n o a "S w 0 q O n L c n .- c 00 H t �- CL W d F O y C O y C pr q C Z m = q N � "O A MO N 0 2 V H a O A q y q E= 11 A �:� � � r 01 E in �� � .Z �' e O. o N Q E q ~ 9 •C ~ u O N T T F W C 7 V N N W q U S N Z 1p `o_ £ q d T H $ E w d ;, —��' m' o a E 'C c w m n �n a _ ae m d rn m A N rn �r H O C— C N d LL C N E fA Nm U t- H W w LL E v w Z U ca ) N x O N 3q e a A d } iii C N C C_ EiO T N � d � J � E ° d 0 o � eC N G A H d N U_ rd N L a as � O m � 0 C h U) -a O H 3 d a C S a e 0 0 O O o r M r M � N o o g M e 1 O v6 a? N N c=; � r N N �n N O N b Yl r } 0 r N N O ODD <e v r v m O H O Of O } O r O O V N A Oe LL c:, a r N ro } O o °o S LL.O O m 8 N o N N LT Sri m vei r o N O ti00 O °O V m L } O O N in LL N N N r a r e 55�� QQ O LL F v`�i N v w n A d } iii C N C C_ EiO T N � d � J � E ° d 0 o � eC N G A H d N U_ rd N L a as � O m � 0 C h U) -a O H 3 d a C S a e W `W W VI W O V / N O O O O H m< S O N O r r O O m r r LL o o m n m o N N V V N 4(] m m m n `mi N v o m e g s O r LL N N N m N N O O O m O O y O O O r LL S S o o o ui m o 16 v ui N o N N 16 o N N a Aa N N O O O O O O m N m O O S O S N V m O S N vJ r fp O VMf O ` O O O Q LL O O 0 O 0 O m O O O O O m N A OJ m O V N m r O c6 Lo r N N m M N N m N c0 N r m m m N N O o 0 O O O O m h m O O O O O O O O O O M N c6 r U- 10 O O M 0 O 0 O N S O O A m N CN'J (rp O N 0 0 S N O O h N N N O (p m m 0 O m r y m N m in c N N pO O th pp 88 pp � 8 S< mm S S by m N M o o m m r� o m m vmi a 7 F (m0 um'J N N N O M C0 ' A LL O N N tm0 y d C d CD 2 C t V ~ � O C� E ~ LL ci U W o� w aEi m c > > v E O V% 5 a o y O y 5 Q K E E o U OU U O to m m V a a U e J y N N lo- C E C O L W L V L 0. V r O V L V r L R t -a, 6.i I- t W Z O OC Z W z Z 5 IL 2 0 v W_ J J W F 0 0 N L 0 0 U d U O O O O V .0 : L C "O l0 Q N m C m _O .01 �m, ` O ✓ N T C E.> 00 6 m )0 U y r Xm mo t O L � r —m m ow mc0�om� c7 ai U ° ma o o c c E > m oo - � N m a O,0 mU o o wm o � m 5E c 0 m m m Y E L y N m F- j o N U j w 0) c c> >-D r 'o 3c: om -O u% V T a3 C p� c L 0 vr o -O C 0 m c m o: U a7 O "CO OO .c )0 � O ) r L 00Ew m Y O al m .c -O O C m O mrj O yNU L m NO U N N >. >`� C C C 0) 0)� T:_ E LL O t O LL c0 f0 C N O m O d o— C N Q E C N L l0 j 0 m I`0 0 a) " c O vE aO E m D j S 2 a am D E Q E ti m> >oo y -> > m m O m N m E E O 2 a) 2= O O c 0 C _ O O y OL C y 0 U .~m. C O a m L 00> � E' m To y NOm O C> NOCm4 'D CL w a O m o N O �° o a m 01 " O a) C m m C C O u! m a) -0 0 o m OI 'O O O V C o y Q d j O) (O "m0 m N 0> N 4'1 O mp) N V E m J E E 00 y a) 0) , w Bo a= � W p 0 U T 5 o c m N d .O N m 'C 0- E c m ma) axi mom' E Lc ya`) -yw mg 00mw�_m O Tw -0m U.CL mp >U TCm _N L'�nE v^•O�OC 0.0 j a 3 Y C 3 m O� C N c ? O C 0 U c QD - Co °��O°E'D N Um a m m a)o 16 ai N 'C U _ m O Q O t CL 3 O a C V E 'C m W O a u C a N O N U V C m Q) c L o m m 3 N o { N m O or O > . L 0aY m 0t a) U m J 0.0 0)29 O--O m A r F m C L W 'O c m d u d a > m c O A c c CL my.aCT GOa d�f3U Cd dcdd dcLm0Q mJ'OO C a dL m" CL.O (D d m r 0 -r O U= wL C cO V, m0�mdd a�m�'c2CNEO >, 'com o dW>d E o o h N cL ai � a) 0.° .0 SQ��'c 0 a>>W E E C m o °O- daa)d(d`Daa)i a)L)o 0m 0 >o como aa))°c)Qoma ,pa)aco � a� 0 `m �au> m d mx CD z m° (°i o m QT 'N° °v0 ao m cC d(D xa dd m o �-° E m �Emdo0 =w 0 d D a T o d m r -O p (V d o U) �. m nL_ U m U Y 0- m m m C(D N a C C.a)IL C E d C �0 N O mm c d L C�I�o CD Q) CA r- (D ac) m C) (D EaLE aNiamc3ri JdOM dr. m N d>..Z` U � N�pa a X N N UY d 0 0 N wtDN M N O C a) .O E L (D. V L 5 N Y C d U fLd, m p. O a) LN N L °= C l0 C (� O c m N d T a L U d y N d U L m N C m o Q U d a n Q m U o d c Y o o Q c c> N a c U T T o m k d y C LO U 7 m C Y 0 >� O° ?i d N O N O (ca > a C N O °° Co m 0 r- O -d �O) N~C UT�m0 mO > �� :NU °d _mN Nor a OOMUN]^ CC U�L-apE 4ldy ar and O.0 CL 'a aY NrL O N O. 7 m C a N. m'- N C E m 7 E m O m C N f' U m O C c o a o m T D a) m L_ O y O y O N y w L a d N d d X MOd O. U a) 0— L COD U O' -L aU_ W m O U '0 m (a m Y U O. m U a) m L O r N° U C 4,C c y U O `. F- L a)Q) m daY o «mg o'w a)L' dom cyoNa) ° c'o Y -� m e ad o o m_ m Laa o E N n -NV N O a) 'D 04d c03 m >mmca0) rn > E>. L°mcoo_p Ncd�J U om_v>coc o. do�'oda N @� m m Ec: mo =WY�O O N a) a= N m m a) y Y C O y O V c U o c m T o aN a 4 E= E c c m o c c E o m m o> L d o m w CL 0 O � m (pO � j L y _ d Q (C� O d T a C a) W a� N Q -pC in O m C C m O U .� g oal.vpo u> °N w dcm oaMm'!> omo Em LE mpO N Q O N a d C y° O j O m? N C M Uc C O. N Q d N Z. d Z d C7 opammaca m 3oEc�0CmN Lm�xo o°mLwoO oaEyN O mNc mw dc�oo2y.NNm'oc ��mmm Um3�a U�j °0 -)d W ° - common d3Oy >3cm3mo.T yoE >n dUdi�dL�d y�o�� _ O C N m o L Q d Co d a m N E F m F a C °U m$- m m Q U d L O. H= Q w 3� L... m O. W 0 a C m b U C .O Y d L N U O m O co c N r N w O O O U L o N O Cl) V O N p aN �v3 mU U c UD O N U O O m L N N c a d m c w m E E C d L m 0 O J D Z i+ A In 0 0 0 <{ (D r N U) ,„ a O Lr) 1 p lO 00 m co No vi G N O N an V' M C V O N U� LL U- �o N ym= CL E c a U > N v = N 0) CD w ca md c v o o a o ( e o d O O (D N 10 r- M 00 7 N d U) ° M c � wcd._m a O N fn d N° d° L HUd K a°) a nm =a M o c 0 (°(D 0 M o 0 0 0 O OD r m M M r N 7 O c mm o v a 0000 a CL N m m O N C O v O O U( O o d c m O U R U C V d 'r C C A C « m C y )0 V c C d E NL 0 t o N O d E'v WUJ as a� i 3c'xx�aE my.aCT GOa d�f3U Cd dcdd dcLm0Q mJ'OO C a dL m" CL.O (D d m r 0 -r O U= wL C cO V, m0�mdd a�m�'c2CNEO >, 'com o dW>d E o o h N cL ai � a) 0.° .0 SQ��'c 0 a>>W E E C m o °O- daa)d(d`Daa)i a)L)o 0m 0 >o como aa))°c)Qoma ,pa)aco � a� 0 `m �au> m d mx CD z m° (°i o m QT 'N° °v0 ao m cC d(D xa dd m o �-° E m �Emdo0 =w 0 d D a T o d m r -O p (V d o U) �. m nL_ U m U Y 0- m m m C(D N a C C.a)IL C E d C �0 N O mm c d L C�I�o CD Q) CA r- (D ac) m C) (D EaLE aNiamc3ri JdOM dr. m N d>..Z` U � N�pa a X N N UY d 0 0 N wtDN M N O C a) .O E L (D. V L 5 N Y C d U fLd, m p. O a) LN N L °= C l0 C (� O c m N d T a L U d y N d U L m N C m o Q U d a n Q m U o d c Y o o Q c c> N a c U T T o m k d y C LO U 7 m C Y 0 >� O° ?i d N O N O (ca > a C N O °° Co m 0 r- O -d �O) N~C UT�m0 mO > �� :NU °d _mN Nor a OOMUN]^ CC U�L-apE 4ldy ar and O.0 CL 'a aY NrL O N O. 7 m C a N. m'- N C E m 7 E m O m C N f' U m O C c o a o m T D a) m L_ O y O y O N y w L a d N d d X MOd O. U a) 0— L COD U O' -L aU_ W m O U '0 m (a m Y U O. m U a) m L O r N° U C 4,C c y U O `. F- L a)Q) m daY o «mg o'w a)L' dom cyoNa) ° c'o Y -� m e ad o o m_ m Laa o E N n -NV N O a) 'D 04d c03 m >mmca0) rn > E>. L°mcoo_p Ncd�J U om_v>coc o. do�'oda N @� m m Ec: mo =WY�O O N a) a= N m m a) y Y C O y O V c U o c m T o aN a 4 E= E c c m o c c E o m m o> L d o m w CL 0 O � m (pO � j L y _ d Q (C� O d T a C a) W a� N Q -pC in O m C C m O U .� g oal.vpo u> °N w dcm oaMm'!> omo Em LE mpO N Q O N a d C y° O j O m? N C M Uc C O. N Q d N Z. d Z d C7 opammaca m 3oEc�0CmN Lm�xo o°mLwoO oaEyN O mNc mw dc�oo2y.NNm'oc ��mmm Um3�a U�j °0 -)d W ° - common d3Oy >3cm3mo.T yoE >n dUdi�dL�d y�o�� _ O C N m o L Q d Co d a m N E F m F a C °U m$- m m Q U d L O. H= Q w 3� L... m O. W 0 a C m b U C .O Y d L N U O m O N r N w mU a U L o N ° N Q= O U L E aN �v3 mU U c T N O G U O O m L N N c a d m c w m E E d L m 0 O J D Z C CO N O U d C O N O m L m V O a) a N o Lo�Ua ,„ a co z m'CD! N m No vi Na ID N N d O a ' 00 N N an V' m N C MQUa m U� LL U- �o N ym= y E c a U > N v = N 0) CD w ca md d _m O C m O m U' m e p O U a (6 U O U _ U .ca U 0 C N ` v d EO d U) a N c � wcd._m a N C O d d N° d° L HUd K a°) a nm =a my.aCT GOa d�f3U Cd dcdd dcLm0Q mJ'OO C a dL m" CL.O (D d m r 0 -r O U= wL C cO V, m0�mdd a�m�'c2CNEO >, 'com o dW>d E o o h N cL ai � a) 0.° .0 SQ��'c 0 a>>W E E C m o °O- daa)d(d`Daa)i a)L)o 0m 0 >o como aa))°c)Qoma ,pa)aco � a� 0 `m �au> m d mx CD z m° (°i o m QT 'N° °v0 ao m cC d(D xa dd m o �-° E m �Emdo0 =w 0 d D a T o d m r -O p (V d o U) �. m nL_ U m U Y 0- m m m C(D N a C C.a)IL C E d C �0 N O mm c d L C�I�o CD Q) CA r- (D ac) m C) (D EaLE aNiamc3ri JdOM dr. m N d>..Z` U � N�pa a X N N UY d 0 0 N wtDN M N O C a) .O E L (D. V L 5 N Y C d U fLd, m p. O a) LN N L °= C l0 C (� O c m N d T a L U d y N d U L m N C m o Q U d a n Q m U o d c Y o o Q c c> N a c U T T o m k d y C LO U 7 m C Y 0 >� O° ?i d N O N O (ca > a C N O °° Co m 0 r- O -d �O) N~C UT�m0 mO > �� :NU °d _mN Nor a OOMUN]^ CC U�L-apE 4ldy ar and O.0 CL 'a aY NrL O N O. 7 m C a N. m'- N C E m 7 E m O m C N f' U m O C c o a o m T D a) m L_ O y O y O N y w L a d N d d X MOd O. U a) 0— L COD U O' -L aU_ W m O U '0 m (a m Y U O. m U a) m L O r N° U C 4,C c y U O `. F- L a)Q) m daY o «mg o'w a)L' dom cyoNa) ° c'o Y -� m e ad o o m_ m Laa o E N n -NV N O a) 'D 04d c03 m >mmca0) rn > E>. L°mcoo_p Ncd�J U om_v>coc o. do�'oda N @� m m Ec: mo =WY�O O N a) a= N m m a) y Y C O y O V c U o c m T o aN a 4 E= E c c m o c c E o m m o> L d o m w CL 0 O � m (pO � j L y _ d Q (C� O d T a C a) W a� N Q -pC in O m C C m O U .� g oal.vpo u> °N w dcm oaMm'!> omo Em LE mpO N Q O N a d C y° O j O m? N C M Uc C O. N Q d N Z. d Z d C7 opammaca m 3oEc�0CmN Lm�xo o°mLwoO oaEyN O mNc mw dc�oo2y.NNm'oc ��mmm Um3�a U�j °0 -)d W ° - common d3Oy >3cm3mo.T yoE >n dUdi�dL�d y�o�� _ O C N m o L Q d Co d a m N E F m F a C °U m$- m m Q U d L O. H= Q w 3� L... m O. W 0 'm0 .d p C N C 0 O N O —O a'_ m 'C p n� y C °= > °' 3 c m 5 a 0 M o 0_.Q L m Co c m.L m m y (7 L m � c — a moo c`rUom`cZE h(a L 0 O O E -Z m �30aUOcm C m T N O Of -0 m O' W m �L. O 0 0 m m C 0 C O L a¢ U 0) O 0 r 7 CD >, (D O- U, 0 V L O 0 C (p O L m .0 C m- m - j 0 0 L F a C m W E m L C a1 m C U O C m c m a m o ci m E Z Y c m c rn 0 o a m U c o o m o> o E o `o1E E c 0 0) � no 0 m° MM , c� > D) O U m C O "0 w a1 0 5 y O d) C C o" O m U)'- M i L Z m C m- p M m C O O E c d) m m >.0 m a m C _C 0 V m r L N 0 0 _rn c E C _c rn C N 0 O L E L N 00 O p Cp C 'O 0 O J m f6 3 2 O L d N i L "O =O 0 U N O r U C a m 0 U O C .L.. m m _ 0 O m L '6'2 y O VQ .0 >'y m L a) o t y O Fc m m m m U y o u 3 Q a y'c m m m'- 3 N 3 0 - c cL c... � m m '-' O C N w C C om "O m V H to .E I CL E c— 0 C h j =• a O D y F .� „ p N O� 10 E N O O Vl 1] �` m OQ 0 O y m > c � c m L m O c o' U' '? c m '0 cu m'c o UQ m `1 m 7 'c 0 a 0 a o 'O Q. N C - m m C m o E U c � �` =02 a m m y= E m >� U 3 t, mo't C m d N I m (� O �O O O .L ` Cp L U. c U m '-` O N L 4m, tq C_ 0 N m N ti O (0 y1 C1 0 .0 L m ai 0 t6 ° m m L E mt m C m m o 0 U) �� m U) m m O NOa. LC'� mm ' 0 0 N 0 Nm L =CaLN a NE '= E O > 0 m U U 0. !!1 > U C r m E O .m. _01 y O p 0 2a C �_ c ou .E 2 O i 2 m V fD a N L.. cu O C y N -O I6 C m r N O m N U1 N y E c p m 0 �. C U c O rn m m m E a N , C (V O m m MM C cr 41 0 C m M p l m U LL. O p C> ae O O C m a m CL m > c E >,� E 0 c x O acct � U C °� >> mEcgEw� �cc o 0.0 c U W m O O c C C + O M C p U a NZNM O C p N m o y m U N c c= '55.2 W m M 3 0 a`1 t0 E t 'E 0 .� ¢ W ,C C C Z O O O m p 0 3 c y U 0 a G m C ci N O N `a m O)L r > L C "' N 0 N a O ._ .L.. N O m I c p ._ 3 m C m 'O O i0 T C7 m o c o1�c G O- 2> c c a 0 L m 0 EEC' U m T V fD a N (n C m a Z M C O C A m 100 Z M D) O L O O `) w y m 0 a 5= moaa) S N N N m3m mom rcc aa) o-0 �L m C N m Z U6ECQ) C al a).- 0 U mmC 01 a 0o uJ " m> W 031 O c O? N N C 1Ca d 5 a1 Q1 O) w .L.. O U 0, O a N y L G d m ui ccQ 0 a) 0 m C `ma`> O m N oa00a�'D ~c N >_y2 Z 0m ;g LL E y 'Mm m a L 0 m 0- m O N 6) N- C C N N m N U V W ° m E °2 a ° r N (D C 100 N .L -a o M h EL rn H m c O ° w 0 N a p l m U LL. O V V Z tD i0 N Z (0 O a0 ae O c E (S 0 ¢ 0 0 0 LL H NZNM Z v m O ¢ W M Q r C N 0 Z yj M 100 Z L6 O1 co 0 M I M c{ M c (O p 10 M O¢ cp 10 0 V fD a N M O O No a Z M N 100 Z M D) N (D co CL in W 031 ap � O P0'1 V N M L N ol C N r N 0 n N N N N 00 t M CO 82 O n `- V N 0 V N M try N (D C 100 N oo pppp N a V V t0 O 7 O 0 (D (D to M p a0 't r- 6 M M 10 p0 a N (D (0D M M O (0D O 5 y� (Q N M M (D M N a M N (� N M Lo CL C O O O L a O y 0 L 00 00 N _ c 01 L O L Z V1 L U) L U) O S 12 0 m d U S S u L v c S� p .d. y A m N 01 K mcy = O mcoaO1yz rn 9 U 0= _y m c E � o, E Op, CL = > o m w (7 (7 J 2 d a e� m 1� m Q OI C C C m IL m r c m L U C 0 m 7 0. O a d ; d .O IL W) o o a 0 0 °D\j e ° c 0M r e °) N (D r- 0 V• N aco (° 0 '0 rn o m cD v t (°h m r o f ii 7�a 0 a0 (D W 0 00 m 0 Cn N N .e 6N M N N l� r 000 N V O N O I O o o N N � O r LQ o W 10 M N_ M N r V U) 01 M a0 0 .Q m" 0 m N In N (O co N N N N aGd 0 40 M (D O M V O r N W O W O (CD O t� M CD M r (0+J N GN lli N N N V M (0 N N ° a E Ise m o C(13 m E 3 a° ay G Z mn Z C N T m = m0 m O ` m ° U d m O E E Z n U Z W U D W X LL U _ m C N a a�pE O.� N O J 0 O 'tea m - �ma) a =:E m C O m @ 0 O N 2 > m L Z a Off, C,y N L j 0 H y mEo CL o ° c m O N 0 L C Co N O a 7 m r Z 0 O 'D 7 y m @ C a)E m C 0 C C A U m 0 0 N L N 0 ` m U0 O 'O w E `a w '0 m m c C m = 0 m0 " 0) m 0 m o m C E o° o CD d m m L -° y o m LN N Q rc m L YO N E 0 p L a � 3 O w 0) (D a) LO p m U N m N N n 0 N m C ,0 aw) y m 0 0 m a N a) E m m >mNE c °rc c'° ama, mN mE CD C )- LL D o c N m o p L " 2 m o E N 0 o Z o L 0 cc v m 0 o m i cy m c = u m cu a) 06E0 E O U aci m r o C N r Oo N aa)i C O N N a N 3 m -O E N -o YO N m L¢ y 3 -D� a o(ti °c'aL�oN� o2m�� m °Loma- -CT <ym c o E 0'Fa mu) 0 0 m m= U m� m m mm momE000a(aidc W rn�wE'too m oT -0 ovEO °LL a am> O1�=�L E J m o o m m c°i-oo ° N o m m °D2 °o ° N y >. _ s= E O L N EU� N o 0 m m ca �.o r c �c BCD Q)rE3c� a$ U me Eym Yym mmo�mxyU)m W N mN(waN -° 0aim J mo mZ3 toa�c -oc° m0 <j o 0 E m o t6 0 y-0� o N�-� m- 0 m m OL N L y 3 °) L C m m U LLC 3 y W m y C N C N > 7 N D. m N N , y U tm ° N U m E m m a a-0 r m N c c a a O O m p (` w m- O 0 y N m y (m/1 p_ O >i N y L " "' 0 3p p m y m� Ew mm�°'c=Q)i2' Z L) a) ° >>m '°NO -mac ma',E c' c°>>c0�nc '5 mmE fA am, MX d"m°'o aLm`m >m'"c�m`m (°5 co> >� °m oryE Z n ° - °o°"� -ama)W 3a) o -m ..N.n Ljmm�Erno ° 3 min>.Uym @�ymp.° °-°mv.c C 0. U m >. r > .�' O (� m >' °i C m c N L .m-. C N m O C m C G 0 �.N .= N O m� mm odm aE0a ~ U moU o °ID °cy rio oc@o 3o a o I- O ao u a U l La ° °�NCCO c�do 48 d a m F I a N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o e e o o O O O M M N N . .M- M M C CO O Orn m m t ti m m m m m m m fIl c am o o o o L Ln 0 00 N N M M O O n n m m m m W j n M jL n M. w w N N N N M M 7 7 1 1 c c n n M M spy N NNNMMM t tM M M M M c ch M M C + Y t O V L Ln W W L LO W W N N n n L Ln m m n n m m EC_ c O) n n M M n n 0 0D M M L Ln Zm N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N re L C Liz w w f f w w m m o o C t N N N O LL c O MO ac o m e E No w"° m L° monr E'OLO. ®2 UM 3 V T 0) ` C-- y N E m U N N 0 L OOi M a 0= p E' C r N.L.. S oL n N C_ E _U M L .L-. M ,.L- ` C .0 O O of NYC a� 0mo� M 3 °� N N c°�v� OU C G 3 0 y m m C y y h (D.0 - c y y N N w= p N .) W y M L (O E U C O `p c y L t9 0I 0 0= MO Ij y 0 N 7 01 ... .0 N N O. d U M c- O L O 0 ._ a y y �y c�f03 cLm mc�yo�cn .O 0. C M y C O y c E o m U ���zo a E 000NNID a`) N D H e =,a) V c 0> O 'C m E" w a o M y N N o W `c M y 0 nj 'c 00 C c r N E L C: ai No >. Nm`N y N N O N M> C _01 M C 0 m d c !� .a N �' U y N X O U L M >. L... C C 0)L N E y O. 00 y C N M j 0 x V y N C _C L ,� y Y N 0 N O. N O N N m M f0 0 Q• OJ a 0 Y N !!L C N U E N N y N y 0 N M.0 m a aNa 0 5)E 3 `0) a)-0 > `01 yc N...oyE moo c~ENM' -N 22 >> L N M 00 °o L L L "� y u E N 0 C w >. O y N 04 > 'NO 0 c N m N y� c�- N y ` C N a 'E y L � L 0 O X N D Y N N N= C C N N F-- 0 L N 0' N >+ C N N t N>> t o 0 N I>0 j L E N O C> N N 0 F r. 0] in y.,. UU [DL 0 0 C7 N W O M N m In N N M M M M ® n m 00 LC v O O L N 000 M j0 � (MD Obi N N N M ® m ? N cq M M O M co O 00 0) u7 N N M M co M ® n Cl) m M V CD LO N w N i1 ccoo M O O M 4 NNM M co M ® O O M ^ V m n n M I o m n co 00 N N M M co M ® N N m N DO 1_n Ln In N N n Y 00 c 0 NNM m N N M M M M Y o M m LO Lo d O M N O) co W 6L LO t O co M n N �. It co .N- N1 17 O O N M O O H m M In rn cm A � N M e} in Lp N O O O O O O I? N W O M N m In N N M M M M ® n m 00 LC v O O L N 000 M j0 � (MD Obi N N N M ® m ? N cq M M O M co O 00 0) u7 N N M M co M ® n Cl) m M V CD LO N w N i1 ccoo M O O M 4 NNM M co M ® O O M ^ V m n n M I o m n co 00 N N M M co M ® N N m N DO 1_n Ln In N N n Y 00 c 0 NNM m N N M M M M Y o M m LO Lo d O M N O) co W 6L LO t O co M n N �. It co .N- N1 17 O O N M O O H m M In rn cm A � N M e} in Lp N O O O O O O I? I? LO 0 0 N C N O L U m m r O c E CD a) ..L. L rn J 0 .L.� CD L N C7 O N N z O V W O w IL H z W J J w z W Q) O C m y U C m d U L � � r amipc�°)y N c m O 0-0.0 mC m C U C C E m. rn2 O M N m m m.� m y O y O w O y C N L N U m 0 V L N ° — J Q.. O` 3 v d m " U') E m o O E N Z!N —CC N C S t 0 c C C o m m > E E a 0 ooa E m O N c C J m C W m n T m C 0 LL a) aj (D a) c L 0).0 O1 C C O — ^O) A. 3 c m O O CU G) 0 U m m O) —8 o y c5=w mE E m C °e e m L - o n L.. =G EE� c°t °8 m m0Om d !L m O` p i6 O Ol N C C C d N O Q 0) N Fn c ._ p ._ U m L ° r Q cc 0- C c L N a) j c drE camcvLm°Em"E �vo yTC8�3"aEcpo X m m '� N aN O1 N'C m a) C c E m N te m e �a O c ' C Y E � �a L m c V a/ O 0 9 E D m� y >oo ID Y a D 3 N N X y C p aa)i m e cu c 4). N d rn c TL a $`* am , Ea °L w L 2) T E m N C J O m p .O N T k m c ), C m �N J C Ltip .— � >a E ` c O C.0 m E0 E U N °-m me I c aci�nrr� o'RLiE�6m ""gym m>�_ NCLWCmm�rc? mom o. L N L c_ a) > 0 a) m 0 c N E L m y D a) T N m m y C U 'jp C IM m m O N N U p a) E .�. 5 cLE co � E yLL E E 9' :E LL O 2 O� I 02 6ob2 A0- vC� u �ob LL o 9002 q 9190 L � 2 Im i 00, T 200 2 z °° °° p°°p °° mac' c m C C CL 0I N c C G L E u R p- O O 0) O C N o a o 0 o c D a a,am� c a 0 L C C O C E p t.o � QD) v oc Lm n C L C m L 0 CL T D N C L � F- °0 3 `1 N O m C O (D (D a)� 0) L m cc c L a) Na U O m O y 3CC, �Y F- N 0 N N r ° N m t1 g ` N LLL 8 L 8 y I a7 N 9 N 8 N g N m P a0 N V c] N a) aj (D a) c L 0).0 O1 C C O — ^O) A. 3 c m O O CU G) 0 U m m O) —8 o y c5=w mE E m C °e e m L - o n L.. =G EE� c°t °8 m m0Om d !L m O` p i6 O Ol N C C C d N O Q 0) N Fn c ._ p ._ U m L ° r Q cc 0- C c L N a) j c drE camcvLm°Em"E �vo yTC8�3"aEcpo X m m '� N aN O1 N'C m a) C c E m N te m e �a O c ' C Y E � �a L m c V a/ O 0 9 E D m� y >oo ID Y a D 3 N N X y C p aa)i m e cu c 4). N d rn c TL a $`* am , Ea °L w L 2) T E m N C J O m p .O N T k m c ), C m �N J C Ltip .— � >a E ` c O C.0 m E0 E U N °-m me I c aci�nrr� o'RLiE�6m ""gym m>�_ NCLWCmm�rc? mom o. L N L c_ a) > 0 a) m 0 c N E L m y D a) T N m m y C U 'jp C IM m m O N N U p a) E .�. 5 cLE co � E yLL E E 9' :E LL O 2 O� I 02 6ob2 A0- vC� u �ob LL o 9002 q 9190 L � 2 Im i 00, T 200 2 z °° °° p°°p °° mac' c m C C CL 0I N c C G L E u R p- O O 0) O C N o a o 0 o c D a a,am� c a 0 L C C O C E p t.o � QD) v oc Lm n C L C m L 0 CL T D N C L � F- °0 3 `1 N O m C O (D (D a)� 0) L m cc c L a) Na U O m O y 3CC, �Y F- > L° o y a c3 y ° ° �'0 yo o v ` y o c . 5 mw c m`m E ° E o 0) c c m 3 m U E 'mL . o w Cyom N N im-. >� U n 0 CO m 'OO O> N C° O N .0 o 'C R N U C a) co V m U U N. a) >> O C m C a O L O N O L a) m T N w p U w C E E O 'N N L N O a) n 7 L W C '� O O N 7 m o �. E C O) 3 aE ° ° U m E o N 8 w c a o d cL 3 E E `m o o t .5 Y m R c N E n m 3m E m� U ° N c N Co y m a) am` C c O O E O U n y C O] c N n co a) C m ..m. m c- N O N C= �= L m C B a) w E T m E N o� 0 3 an E 0 m U° F o ny N E'_ o m N E TZ g E.O Cmi o no o m E-o CD i N o 7 'a dU U55 U N o> m L o w E m N C N= -o > y a) .L.. m n 3 N .N Y C N 7» C m 4) C m L 7 m0 D) C y ¢ m m t m c o o rN, C T O _m U S) G 70 F S] O. F N m_ y C N N N U N c 0 U C C O U a C .O m C UCtOi1 Ol jNO. �ymO SQL wC OVi- 0— a) °$° o r E?° 5.E a m 0 o N c aci E a ° g 3 Q)) U y m a `o .00mNw Uaom 2- E m ��cLi� �coEc0 mSOO co0F pE >m ¢m...3 oc.N �rN_ =_ °Ed L O N ._ L U a1 0 O N W a) c N O O)'U C L C O J y° E Y F y o E c c N E a o U C m" o T U° la r '- c ' L c L N f6 T G T.O .N .� N d U y !� 0'- BN o c E U v v a Z N x- a U c y� a)EocEt NOaciaci3 Ev`6E �QE C: c m`o ° noE ao `otat° a :?c W o Uoy cc00 L 7 a) > n O' >'U ` C N Q U a7 > O p N U N C U m.N N° U) Q' oEQoQ) ca °m o5 c -c ETaC uccE:°'� �E H °c ma �cE lavaEL yEma)7 O Q) O 0 0 ..L. - E a) > U d L E O o�E °� tc'5 m o3 a) Q) L) C Q tiw m y �y o o nc m r.c o£ nc .v m a m -)oEmH r3 �3Em N >� m O O o Y N )O : O E C O O L N E OO LN N O C- a) .00 L O a) . N c ii -E- :E- Q) 3.5 o)� _c -o N^O wW�oTy m nOY .LO. 3: SyN SOQ N zmna o LLI a 0 U L N C m E C O N 0- m N m 0 7 a C 7 z O 0, 7 o a) o .0 W >- yUmwc oWOou)a cc N N e M L r N W o) � ", >- 4) Y �+ o C G "O o W maC W oa) O m N Q) a) 'L" 7¢ U) a) CL mmZ.�`my W > = Nrw�� `m- mY no >H EL NLL vv cmi _ 0 D CELu2 d ��A'o °T UXO N a)domZc d 20-2 2 'N CL CO m n o C t a) c S m£ m U 0 a) L w lL G H tF U W ry W g 0 y LU ~ 1 N O N N 0 a 1 LL 0 N S 0 LL m N go a. _ o a I 1 N Tj Q g QSI o oo ry sluepnIS } v Z ui U Z 0 U J 0 0 S N N W 0 Z 2 U W U) 0 W J O Om 7 c7 0 m O d U Y (O L M V = n'c E m U T N m m O T a) L U U) m � c m E �$ O'L c - c O E .-u _ O m34) N y - � U N Q) -0 pj J E M o `m N 0 C cc U m a c ¢ U3 o c no£ O a) m L O O) U .a w N c N -C m c 7 U SMoES 'O w O a c m E O C U C N t U C O O t U o } v Z ui U Z 0 U J 0 0 S N N W 0 Z 2 U W U) 0 W J O Om 7 c7 0 m O d U Y (O L M V = n'c E m U T N m m O T a) L U U) m � c m E �$ O'L c - c O E .-u _ O m34) N y - � U N Q) -0 pj J E M o `m N 0 C cc U m a c ¢ U3 o c no£ O a) m L O O) U .a w N c N -C m c 7 U SMoES 'O w O a c m E O C U C N t U C O O t U 0? Q 7 N J Q U LL N c m U N 3: (a p m N 0 3 m (/J w _0 a Q C O O V y C> E U m o= � w a �'_ o c c� ac o m m -° N m W m m c V ,O tm C m 0 0 C U m C -O al U y O) m n "' C m m E .m. (ca C C N O ° N NC Ny C n0 a) -0 _ N y 0 .m+ U '� n �1 m 'O CO C U y CL O N O= N ". m` C U C N N m aN C m y p ` o 0 - > c m a) -o O m m O E O la a) U3a Q) -Fa oyc�a `o¢o� v O C m C a) = Y N y n N C m3 w m a U C T Y .Q cL E -O U C' +' N Co N m o Q) ° my ° $S'c rn2 °o a 3 m (} = m m- a) a) w cr :? a Eby 3 U L C E 0 O p) y N p y m E C C y L E 0 CD o.m m mo m=in ° c 2 a) ac ° Z m L m 0> C O C o m U U ? O U O 0• U i0 O C N co O O v O U y O O O C rn� O" nC 0 O O C m m J E a N E C N O L m N = m N J �.% m -- N O) i° cym mL`�Emm wm o� ° m. N Z c- a) U o n3 0 m m N O1 a) m 0 N O U 0 0 CL d - N 2 U X L) Of � E U a. C) MnN Q m rnN m m r C O N L 01 0 o= 3 m c °°.° O) c o " rn o O n'0 - y O mN0cmmc E:= .Lm.�� wm T O U L U oo O E 76 c J ° C C m y N N ° , m a) N> T - O N_ - p > p > N w d N a) O� O N y .a) O m N > N m 4 E E2 ° nE °o E`m co m L m � m0 N E -a LL L c m (a m r p m N 0 a) O- O d 0 U N C y O L N Y ` m w Q U 0 y r NU o m a Od W O a p O O E x Q O O a N U Z h L G N m o o Z ;~ c cw '5 a c 0 0 8 Z v o c 0 n U B ° E D O C = LL y oU " i L O m LL a) O o w 2, CL N N O U= 0 Mn C C O ) m m- m m F L O J CO EUO m m° P d E<»� to H a N L d i+ Q. Lai, U N C C O a E O U M CL zi �r i ►SJ N N z W z a �.i z Q U) N W U a z z z J a O) C O 0 m y E E E m a U C N E C m E 0 a m c C �a m E N � L C Q D z w J U z Z z J a N W_ H J Q LL m O N a 0 0 a) N C a C N L m m Co N N E m y N O O O N o a) o Cc £E0 ) CLrn mm y Y C w m m 3 E :° d mw >> C vi N :° c a E p m N T UO O a s ca M TN M a)w a ma 5 m 0O m m° `o� >CC a 'O y U) O U O C Co O C N 0 m N a N� a > mm mn .c �CL Zs -L aa mo� m cu d w c o~ E o a O o o m a m0 y a) ° caao o o d a4) m N° ca (D � a) -0 ° y cocrn_ro y Q) .0 � ' C tq L m E "O m O U O O N .L. a° O Q 0 >1 - L y C T C O vi w N m ;gam a)� no o. w c� .6 mN =C o E m 0w o 'o,00 =T Eye mTma ZmN E cc o N N Na a °� y in aCi �-o L Co m O a U N s U O N p _ m ao i C O a U . 1 CD O � N 0 m day L EC ° > > ° n 6 m y U E° E E m IL n 0 m C N m ° � U a N °° w N a Zc N, O o w Y m D > L L C ovC ,� _U c Q Q a <<< > : iiERm v .U- .uyaa� U r . N 00 5 o °a m T N C o s °cuNi tm —o°mtm tm °a F- �Nm W F- wmn�EF -a F-ao C T a a m d C C a > m 0 c ° CO U O N O a N �0 C -O o.0 m CO (D m N C 7 U �p Q) u0- 0 CL N O O .0) N m U � N L L m omapo d w N N c aE m 0.E a O E r C '� 0. Etc° E N_ N O O ECo aom0 U m L C O a) cu a n N N ll m a C a y p O FL - mmyo..n C N o d m N m N O E n N N m C m N U T d N T y E, m v E m° N m w m .0 > 0-6 3, d O y a N O m C ° C OI ')a C LN CQ`a . - cai � a) C Oc 1 � cQtm °- :°rSomEo A m U 6 ao E m mom ° o �U a Q N 0 � Ea E -o m com:° . m o a) oa m a �LU cs 4) i O U C N a) N (D N O) N m tm S O C m 0 ..m. N. C m N (' U t n _ N V1 CD d O a mom o N< c a "go aZ) 3Ua E¢QiLQ N M > 0.� N -L o m m U `O C — C .N m @ O N p c y y E U L E � E o c U) o m m y w (D o- a C N �dnm� N E ac N C z N m y N m y N 0 cW 6 N = a)O N W N > R 220 N IL Cy o oo@oc w 3 LLw w2 m Lu �ca to $ rnaO�c `0 U Q d O) N p N N c mw - w C m-0 N O C p O m a) mNEw1 a T — a CL 0 p. r m am�@0.�� m m m c c _ C C v m N m m O i U m 00 N O m m m ° m o n c U rL nY O L p 5 O 76 — 0 y 0 0 o , 0)C—L -:: m m o 0.0 Em�ma°ia� Tm m c Ew_ o aa a m) U O T° a 0 w U m c- m m O C.- O. O 0 O m .0 0 ° a N 0 L) ._ w m m0. ow E- O w ti m m-2 m U° m U E w yr2O1aci° m J c a 2 0 r> �� 0o L cu N O "O m D O Q v m a I C O C -o 'O O Y w m Ia 0 0 m o c Z L a) m J w C C G N O c c 0 C L w O m U w m = C m> y 0a)a3 , r w >, -0 m a) m m n p a 00 E o ° o E o m 0 m m c m m 3 E U v O w O m m p m m g o M 3 O% E o LL n> U m m a 2 m C -L C.L.. a) m LL r m m E cwnw_ 0o a a) m 3 E N O w e O Z-OU m 3 0 a) d N m m w C cr m w Y m Ct T° o a O J O 0 > O N C U @mmEET m C LD U0 _O C L m m N U UN!it- nQ m m O T C a) U w L fa ° m O O W.0 m C ' w > O p O J Q p w 0 3 0 m O O O 0 cC EU U OEdac mm 0.0 mNc� a =.c 'a> YaU ` °vvc >o wJ CD p c a m m w w N m C U L m C C 3 m O N" w p. C N L m w mow, O Jai. ° U w w D1 3 C m 'c U w C w L m 'D ° L O m O O . y O ID p ay M LL O E m Z` w. �m0co e m� d N D j `n G O V C C w.0 W O w O m w m m c °.. a E o 0 c o � p m w m 0 a) c N a0uwm �0 cU 0a J €LL E_ >mm wUmn wEOm- mm °`" Jcn w L 0 m O x w m .p J> �. C p u .. „O y m ,0a m m U N w� m r m a) - �oa) -p �,a)wmmcyo fA �u> >'m 10 J C.L.. p Z3 r))�. a � Oa'O y ^0w N O ry — O O of LLI Op Q N °mHu0i >`mcJ°� Jam=° -0 a) Q C m J o °m0 m��+°CEc0 Z �,(n0 wn c°- a)c Tema c c I E dm,� wpm a) -E- mm� Q J--r GU W tbO m a aL C o w a y- v O 00�-0 c c� o `m �. U d ^mwp .p- mct ac m > w m •Cc o'M 0 L Lm o m M N O m O E y ac 0 w V° _°m 0.Q c 0)c c m0a"'E"mE Q o mU -m0 o m�'m cm 00- EEm CL U a°imv M J J U O E aim a) m n O� x2 w m o C-0 O O m m a) O` a) a) O ° Q L U c N U) O O m LL W H U C O CLM mm_ a V H an O LL LL 0 as C a) w m T w �O a) t -p a) a) 'o m m m C L m C_ m m U._...._ j L L C L m w m a L C.L. w +� O 0 > U C"O > w a a)ww E m� m m� O C a m o� E 5 0 c w 3 C a i) a U O p J'O o c -OO o o c m umi c m t m w E m C.O.. JwE pwpaLL OJ`Ua Nm'0 a) m m a1 C O L m r 3 0 U o 'O a 0-0 w O C L a) m. C m w N m > a ! 0!O (D 0f EL EOa O 46 m �> a ' �c0 `L ° o -o o Q)? o 0 M W a W m O C I m m m ° w E 0 L > O N m y �o _ T? N p O'o L ~ o O Q ° �I m m w C m c a) O C L 'O -0 W m O1 ul O C J ~ CL L a C C ` m i N N '? m C Q p_ J m a m ( 0 0 a w �' C L a) O p L C wW Do C0 N E 0 y w L .O m o w T a p a n m m O N E U a o m E � Y � N O °'E� C 2ac0 LL -0 (D o LL U a) m m O V mom w> w C > n a wa) `= a) ;a a) w m C > Z C O O 0 Zu O � _ ci°m p ai wmoO O L W ° w .m �m o c Eoo o co E m N �C �`'io ai w O w w� o-o y N "O O Z' m 0 0 0 C m w aw.. O .+'N ❑ E w m Q)° a E m m E c r _ a) m U O p m .O y a) a m O p y w a) 'p p a>imaTi Z McL�E�mmm°ami ?:Co U a) m maw d2wU) 3: —M =.off . —.. C.0 N O O m m N N C w E rn._ m 0 (D ch CCy O `C'D N o MN M O d m N CO w m U 0--5 .0 72 C d 0 0 0 w 3 G O m QENay �w0 om a a (.4 a m m y r O C C\l m m O^ E o o (n t y m a° z a ` N` w E d ° s Q N C O °° a rn rn° o m a c rn O (D LO N .0 F p C C .E m m a cO CD T C C ��amE�mam� .8910 Lmwrn aw o Lo 0 >` m O °` •N• Om a N �ONr M C CL m } Z o 0) O m� L'" C'@ O E 7 �� av SO m O o= . V O L a c � c 3 v o L = � _ c O O mJO� °LfO " m E v a O Q ~ m J r- N ' N E E o o N.0 N m C N 'O N'u E ° o m '5 o c m c o w 0 O o ' '.c . m E 0E V w w 0 0 N_ m p°p ° a _ 0° N ° ° °_ N m m m o IL N cp m ° 6 u O t m° =Emtnj�Na� V llJ >, N U m 5 N O �J„ N m m- N O C o� H o� - G O Hm°oL - (a wavom -n O 0 C m00 C�71,- `y a o NN.- 0 C-4 0 (D ch 0 nrn corn O� 0 o MN M O e m r o O V' (D C d to to O m -mo "°o�wm '6m om a a C\l m m O^ E o o ~ ~ a° z a ccom w E d ° s Q N C r co (D LO "i cO CD Oo C N .8910 L` 'V m y E Lo co �ONr o tq C N � m �O r E 7 �� ° d m « y y d NmO �" � y UO m '- LOJ>.m v 7 y 2 J r- N ' N > N O w C d =N Lm > CD N 'O N 2 M N a N U q m emu° E 0 w w 0 0 N ° ° °_ N m m m o m o m o a m m c_ E U a m m m m N O �J„ N m U N o� =5Em Q >°mmo_mo 5)50 U w ° @ m aJ p m `-mm� O rn'omm3� `o omen C) nom' d r oc W.- J_ c m m U i m L Ol C `m m m O W m 0 (? - ca C O m m L U o N N 'O Y o 0 m tC LO 0 U C m C O 'O O m O C j w m m a M C U m � 'o N J O aj o E Z m N m N v! C ° m° z O :E 'o 0 E .- V, c m `mEE 0 0 o° a g m m v Ez5 3 �EJ 0) m U0 o o m - " v O m M° O J U C a+ ° IL >Q- cW(nd�N y:: E a) a� ul m (ao cmi L o pm � m 6 Et'oU: .'? gym-' m L J O U L O J ° QUVCIS2UZO L m J O m 'O U N 0 0 0 � m m y v m U vi N (D a UI H 'r j C Q N N m da'- N E D n0c C d m� m mf0 m -mo "°o�wm '6m om a a C\l m m O^ E o o ~ ~ a° z a w E d ° s Q N C w 00 C N Q J 0w C O m0 y y J C V m m m U (n N O Oo C N @ N > O C m 00 V i U "O y L` 'V m y E U m rnU »L� rnvc >' H N 0.0 o tq C N � m V QQQ _ -d N w Q a m ` O m U ° d m « y y d NmO �" � y UO m '- LOJ>.m o 0— G Q J r- N ' N > N O w C d =N Lm > CD N 'O N 2 M N a N U q m emu° E 0 w w 0 0 N ° ° °_ N m m m o m o m o a m m c_ E m° c� ov °v N a m Y h N m m N O �J„ N m U N o� =5Em Q >°mmo_mo 5)50 U w ° @ m aJ m m `-mm� O rn'omm3� V omen C) nom' d c oc W.- J_ c m =m U i m L Ol C `m m m O W m 0 (? - ca C O m N m 0 u o N N 'O Y o 0 m tC LO 0 U C m O'O m m a L 'O O m O C j w m m 2 m N y m � 'o N J O aj o E O. z E c N �o E N v! C ° m° E 0 m 0 yz .- V, c m `mEE 0 0 o° a >a.c m v ° Ez5 �EJ 0) m U0 Q) m >O T ar o" L Q) o aoi aE N C N .O m L � U 0 0 Cm 'o E U o `m '> = c o m Urn C C E 9 m a- C L O 0 a 0 Um e c C a o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o c 0 rn a rn v co m m y E w m N N LO m c a N N N m V QQQ w ,O N M m U � N m m t O A O E m m m m U L `m a`) m ao Q c a C t c M N Nm N m jp m -00 O N = m L m e O(a a) �n '0 N 'O a) 'O m O C M .- 0 .L.. C L O m U 'a C 00 E r L m C 7_ O° N U N C N N E o am m W y E ac c � N° c � 0 `°° 0 y 0°3 cs2� m.c o Y'0m EOmL U m _ o o = E c U m m E U m: N N N T o= y c y N c -5 a) c E m y E o N y o CL o o a °> E c E c E m E o,° m o m s N E y 0 C yy m G - m O c m �O O C m m .m.• >�.m.. C -0 K U m U O E 0 Q O 0 C 0 Cl j 0 m W m L c a p~ C a)= O O. N ''^^ m L m m E m C E U o 3 V L N .-° CL N > p 0 0 N CO m E a) �. m'm m N m O y 5 o N ° C7 "� EE'c � m m E m a) 0 m d ac a3 N E x i 0 cc O A? m� o m c m E .� a) y CO C Q O m c CL ,� J C c 3 m O m 0 u o� y T m V m c c U d c Z U c M y a E " c Z 0 c ' N U E > O «- N m Lu c ID W LJo E m N m m c m 6 'o L) (D m E N 0 E H ° 3 Z ° Z) o Z _m v N c c O N 0 0 L. 0 O N L v w -0 U a O m O o ' Q N- d 0.0 C '0 C J O o L O E O m N p U m r L o a E° m m _N N O C° N 3 N L_ C r 1] m> w�/ 0 N Q).2 Q 0 m u. L @ U C O> r L 0 m O C N E `� T T U U O (n '° O p m 0 m0aD m2mrnEo Q y w E3 o. ai axid H °C7cc°�� mm Eaci wE Hv°in 2i ? !L- 'o°mc.L°'. M '° a) c @ m °c cY �roi °v > c 4)> a cac m caa)o ma�i� m`o�m�`�aciEOm �N>c-0 E o a v j "O U C C N >O 'NO ` 0 'L`• O y N N y c -= y N °: 2 C m O 0) L axi m�mvi °c) Eta mCD 0 t- c�o" n EmcCc c o Y o.$ m C -O >. O L m U y N c C 0 !� E w U c N V j h >. 0 N m rL.. N cl O a) C) O U ` N U m o m` � N N a N m Y m E N N i N N N 7 m m 0 C m E O O r N U c L N m 0 0 .L.. N -C U N m o a) C C O -0 �' O O m V¢ c U m m y m aj m m 0 y O> E ton m° a N t m E .p > ` c°a N `o L° jVd,F UL m4U EO°-"mgN a) 0 L x N `� N .`. O c O N N m ... C N U ,= O w J L 'O ° m m L a) a) U YO D O E c m N O N U (6 ,� U N >. y (n 'O w -o d L a) E m L a) E V > '�C- N '@ ? '° N E U L 00 '° 0 w U C C a) E O U E O m_ N^ L N c m m c c a o n 0--c 0 a) v c E N E L m � m 3 y V d E .O 0 -0 °" E d m > m 0 N 0� N a G° 0 a m N O N C C N l0 C C m m O 'C O U @ oo 3 aa) i 0 - a C j N `1 N E W N T c m. V -O m 0 Q N w U O a) 0 0 ? G C N m m O` T T L N a) E ° m ° N 0 N (0 'O C N ° > j m> m m C a m m'' 0 wL.. II a. O N N t LL Q O N E m =-° N[ O N N L N N L O) a m N me U�y .N. L.ma o� mI rN,w '-°�cN p jy N L 0 0 0 0 C m N m N N ._. N E «C. c 0 °) E 01 °° .O V"OO N O a y L N 3 '.' N O O 0 L ° L m N` a) t/1 N m O O y d T m N E m _ N rN,` N C U L m° L m O C O y 0 0 0 L L O O G O. C E OW �' LL U 0 LL . a -a TT m N o. 2 m 0§ 2 E w § § k u \ cu � \\�0 \/\ )}\!�2 =$/ \§)k }) } ^\ §; % / % ;«g22§ = CL a) - ,(;3|§a \)E0CDM # «(E# -Z (\( \Iƒ \E) �t±°`�`f _MD .0 2E \) /2�[)E\ a) \{® E \uc0 ) D $\2 \)\ f°)(fk \ { \� 0 k3 /]32 2 ®3 ®k± cD E fy§ 25 {|ef` \) \j'0 �Z\2k)) A$E(&)! Gait§»% - °` = ==E /5 \m |k$ kk)W E J)}_Zhe \�kk \f $§ = & =f «;§k[) 7ka2if 22/220 \/)00 `B� = -= ® ©22®2 { {){)0 E a, 0 N CD W ca \ \\ \0 7t / /Kf« U) � § ■ k LU s CL § \ � k u \'r E \ \� !r)!\ cL \c 0\ k0(\§ )a ^� E \ /\� \\ �(f) \( /CD > L CL cc Al u C E O L E Q. V L d ii m E E ca E m L CD O L IL i A U) W U) V) 0 Z Q N Z O F- Q Z cW i V W w Z O v O r Z N N >� Oo BOO c d 0 o n n N m N FJ N E N U} V y 0 rn a c o 'O y =OU C c0 O y a LL N C N m O O O N °O o 0 y O C U C a C N .- N m c c aa)�E C 4) m m mEtf m c p a-ci o a M CLZ N V> U L N 3Qa) c M= U N m ° �'o/aiU c L.. 0) O O 01- O ccc aCD Ey aQu) L U o m a a y 10 aai — mE }N L `o m o d m ° 2 N y m N 'U a1 p 0 Q E0 42�—N a Q) a) L 10 C N C C O O m a (a C N ac E E o E d U N H CO m y E O O ma M E c 0 a) m E m m > 3 O p ID 0 v_ E > - N O -a L n�Q m � U ° m m U } N d N y � > O H I1 M y > 0 LL 0 O N c N O cN0-mL .N aU o' N > a W } � m a LL O. N N a) m c `O„ 0 0 m E O O L m O m C N U w 'E0 is ° N mN amO`c p N J �c ° - N Q C L m OD N C O N i U ✓ ,O,^^ V ID cm m °" ° ° 0 0 CL S v 030 °�Ea 1— C9 o� m EL ca 2 °= o a N Z d c t' } c r E . N U cc C >� N m W N N N C L J a ? 0 o ru0 � u d +. O c c A o. m N 1Ya p y QI `C« C N 0% ct do E mo »o, VY L O c mL $ C 100 O ` G O N N 4 wr @� m > = 06 O 000 CL o . N E in 0 v_: oL c u m o a°n m O f9 N N d a a m 0 N C O a m a C m N 0 O U N a) 0 c 0 U 2t V50 C p O U m W a1 O N N m ac N m n 0 moo a v y m w c V 1T c c E y o m- m N M U 6 c a o. — D E N c �, U N N pd, .0.• =1 U � N O m N y n N C a) C mL m U O E ° c d � N W m m N `O„ 0 0 m > r O m C >' 'E0 E >c mN 2 •3 L- c - c 0 al O C O N w lcoc« d.a dtaR cm m IM m CL . > V) I C_ y M ill N O Y7 r y M 9 d T 7 6 t' O r E 0) o 0 M o. rn 0w d) :r_ c o c� m ` 0%r E1°o m ru0 oy 1co o te m p t CL 41 O 4, E> N ° c �Qaa) a c R y r E N (D V ~ N d c 0 A y m 0 c o +' ° 0 0 Y Y (� N" L O m p d p d C >� H y w c 0 r o a1 (% c a m c 1yEy ° a w IM Y L c o p C m o p p c tF 1a ai m y y m y ai cy m Y E 1�0 w C O p N •O m L of c m L C 9 c p mmr d L> p 0Odd O L Ny m as ) CCO 0 c C ma M CL H d-0 N a O1w aj ; ��� y N 0. E O E m s E m o c M •O a+ O m m „ a j, CL •O tM 7 o > U w al 7 9 A Ic0 C L p•� L O C y C O 7 L O•L O O N m o 00.N � rnuw N M u o d au o r N M er N 0 0 0 a 0 °0 LL CD U 1n Lv O N O O C m N L a c c o 0 cu w U y L m a d " E � d � c N N (1 m m O) O U m a C w C O N mho/ c c c � 0 "c c o u0 U O 6 a) E a c U m O) N d C U N a) a) U N �'C M a N F } 1aa Q c+5 N m Z mF 00)i.°a 0)a)a �m caNim n2 � n ° a E o a) N- -O N O N W91 �r U c aI `O E C ~ co w r- 00) Lo N a n L U C o. a) N "' O O C 9 r , It N N O W O) E Ea c" C U N j (ap 7 o O1 C a) �+ a5 �0 00 Ow y c- J a a) >- o E n N c J N a) J N C 0 a) O.- N c) Co O @ N . O O 04 O (O 0) Q) m w..0 _.- 04 `0 a Q O N N '.- O U c N U 0 1) 0 N00 .- o 0 N p a a 0. L a) 0 0I 3 J a1 c N °�L_aci ,D-0 6 E 0 ti o m 0a m asE ON J a1 E O O J LU U 'U C> al N r E 0 0 m w o to a n c 0 v° a m .- O a) .0C -O f0 L L w W N c 0 a 0 2 U U N a1 C (n Y U U c IE N 0 c 0 a J a) mr"nMw to `W(oww 3 W„ m m ca oZ m c0iN0�aaim m c E 3mU c E o Co N n a) 0 0 0 0 al '.0-. O 0 0 a3 U 0 E 0 a) N )p O N E cr. o� m?�Po0EWam o.N�E c Hc�0E-JO E° Q QUW2�yH >C7F ° tt °c CL H« na) m 0 W e N O N 0 c a o c c _ N C mw p Y C > 0 N > W .- 0 Y C C O 0 m a) I >>C [0 a O N d N C O- N M m J> U E 'J' m L m a) E `-'a c 2 r U O W y E E c 0 0 0 c N c m y a j O 0 O N d C a1 , �) U c y 0 r > a) > `L" O a U a Z Y O a U n D7 O. LL N 'oocm o) (D 'oa E m n Nw r~ E� E°c cm =oO Lix . N Iw 0 N Oc C 0� > o a O a> )o00 y me a o a ° s m i, 0 U-o ..x N m o-o a> oL c m W cc a)m E` E0 Q-o�o`0)0 m E� acv; c0�m oCL mN wa) E 0 E E n a) N a) c N C L U E 0 0 3 O) a) `� L 0 J Y N a1 U a J C {0p ° `) N E a) W O .'0-' m 0 N -c 0 'O d N p c C a) w Y 0 N p 0 N O V) a) 0 Y o- C d O d _N a :.CD 0 0 a] o a) U(D U 0 L) u) m w .N N .0. E a L U 0 �) V% i L O w -O N .N Lo O. U N N N J E a NO N C N U L T rn a W m a N> 0 N c E .0 C) m«. 0)00)= m m.EL c°y coE a) N V r K L J = a O lO N D U N co U O Q) J U CD � N O O aQ o ctt 2-m mi w 0 0 o aoi E L?;o n n E m a) E L m 0 0 ° o J o > E E a m EN Waw$3 UEL Scw Qa p0 dm� m c 0 0 N i O O N N J c U O U) a R a3 j a O w N N N 0 a N U 0` 00 0 d C rn Boa c 000 - c a�U d x —0 N I W Q W V °? E n as r E U � 0 0 0 0 U oa 0 0 a) L L OJ W � N C- ui o m N o U OD L N O O w Z LL 3 E M o a C U 0 Y 0 0 7 N C w0 ca) AEU w°00 o Cl m o y m v a v U m N U .L0. 3 3 o o ai 0 C C V Y 0 c Eo C m L o a > rn E N N t 0 a?oo-o aaa Ea?'E m m U O V c L O na c Es n 0 N O U Q a a U i n i Q IL U J O mx m rn mS F � S W J O D 3 W Z O W a 8 x x x 0 A w x Y CO _ Ew O `O o E �� CD 0 d m �a W d R U U y U W A O; O N O N = d Z� IOD yOy V N 9 U Q Y C N N O O O. E N N N O O U IM "cE w N = W az w O L Y y r O ct O= O 3 YU QUW N `m E 0<¢ °0 m 3vin :U d E`m avz J U U C C M 3 W V F O F Z W 2 W J W 3 w z m F V d N w 3 E N IYO E CL m? � L •O 0 0. 0M ?t9 m > ' u t° _o m L e emu o CD m prii c a W J 0W w S>mU J0 UWA W 10 2 3 «mm m o rn N A •O Z m Of OOf N N pGi N )a U 'O 1 m C- O co O O O O O r OE N N N N N N V O IM `m a c E C7 Y p pY m 7 az o m m m m •mm 0m and va Yami �QC am QU o m �¢ E¢ =¢ •04 Oa¢ QU t7 m O E ;z C9 Q HV fJ U cv A a� IS c �' O CO1 O C Lad F- E _ d a7 C E O Or U " d d y N C d C d .r. j a O. d 7 E N r C d d u c .-O d C Y E n d 6 N a� v d M 0 N d a1 d N s O a J m a1 O T E o 0 O y L O O1H U N m r O T U EO d 0 a p l0 N d e a H d L F 2-60 m d E c d ` o- 7oYa•- L r > O G -cE u „d, d w E T N Y Mm m ` c d'Y 0. r d C 0. C C m O O C Y r O A 7 10 L w d E PC N N O1w ai d C C 7 A C 9 d O 7 V m O)U w H N m O d ai O) V 7 a T O1 O O C L V F r o BK- O V N E d U p C d d U w M Z N N O d N d d d O C a O N a G N H N - U E O c Cc N C Y C N a) O C d d C C T O ID m U E N y O), > r O d _O O 16 d U, N N N N T+L- C d N d d N N N 3 a_ N = N a10 2 U d C d0. dock �ar� E (m o T N 'U U Z a E N C N J 0-2 N m (n > D. al 0 Z''0 N d E-NO 4) Eo L CL Q d L° c r E a o c x c 3 d O T O :0 N a1 V) d E c m m Er F U U U cc C w N N N J Q) a J U cc tm C G T N O u c d d a) H J E U) N d m U E � ID $ `ra L N IYj 3 N d CL > U a) U U A � O � C a C E c 0= CD J O (n u C �O d A= , U O � E o -0 a d CO > C C N 45 N o N c E E o > o a) LL O �E o°- d N O d E N `d-' d a m L N O) y C m N m U E m m d la «O)U o a 3 :3 U) U) C) G dQRU> -NO2 oin r o BK- O V N E d U p C d d U w M Z N N O d N d d d O C a O N a G N H N - U E O c Cc N C Y C N a) O C d d C C T O ID m U E N y O), > r O d _O O 16 d U, N N N N T+L- C d N d d N N N 3 a_ N = N a10 2 U d C d0. dock �ar� E (m o T N 'U U Z a E N C N J 0-2 N m (n > D. al 0 Z''0 N d E-NO 4) Eo L CL Q d L° c r E a o c x c 3 d O T O :0 N a1 V) d E c m m Er F U U U cc C w N N N J Q) a J U cc tm C G T N O u c d d a) H J E U) N d m U `o E � ID $ `ra L N N 3 N � c > U a) U U d 'O O O Y U a C E c 0= CD J O (n u C �O O d N U w � E U d c > C C N a N o N c E E o > rn O �E o°- -m Q O - O m d a m o d c) r a E�m0'o� m E y e J a y CO o a Z o o dQRU> -NO2 oin v E 0. �~ of a .0 d O] `o S c o N E J d U CD 0 Y ' co d 'O O O Y U O O O O V V U w ) a`) c E d mm oU a N M rn O V r iy D1 d C N N r N O C N c) r a OC) c�i m 0 > O� O O c E a) N p N Ol U V O d d U d a) v E 0. �~ of U) d O] C. d to w O p o 0 o O o N N N O M N C� th N N m N V aJ ci l7 7 N O O O O O O O C N N O r � N (D f� tD ITL N ~ O LL LL S W K N K `o S c o N E J d U CD 0 Y ' co d 'O O O Y U !n d O O O T a f0 pj d a9 U w ) a`) c E d mm oU a r d �� COII') O WS o Z.5 E a) a D1 d C N N r N O C N 0 O -Om ` N —L N J > a) -0 d w c d 0 > O� O O c E a) N p N Ol U V O d d U d a) v E 0. �~ of U) d O] C. d to w } H T d LLU m a a) 0 a) O Q) d 0 O d F'm �r E r J O L N u .3 d L 0 �o r d � W N E d N � Y G d w L L C U � � C oa m N C C d O G @'O SD E n m�d`o 'm - N N O 3 M d d l0 L z >,a u� co A w R Dl O c C CAY C O C N Y E a) N o N N N `Y.'c a) r 2 3 CA 2L a. d 7'V 3 @ � O a L L -. OL c -- c m U a y O a) U °t m U � (D m U p " C C C m O Y N N p m m m V cn t= N y N N E 3 > c [n ` O CL= O N C U E c a (D my E'0 m� c . m O— o v a) m m Y E m — L a) O a.a� 0.0 $. UN a) -0 A d S �cc E E (D a) _ 0 E= m m v Z m> 0 3 m m y E U O O. L O y U `LN M Olw. U m m J xw m'�mc `p U N p y O E N Z m0 0 .y C y 0 a) 2 EN� >t V = 0 v ai5 w R Dl O c C CAY C O C N T N N N `Y.'c O c r 2 3 3 °- O m a. O U 3 O -. OL c -- c m U w c m E a) U °t O (D m U C V cn t= E C E 3 `m CL= ° N . m O— o v a) mY E N A (D a) m E U O O. L O y U `LN M y a "O C ) m L N O O` L N 11 CD N N N c ,°c y c U d v c m E ` Lrn E'� N v g -C6 mm N co aa m N c o ECn�m o E p > o o E o m m E >. oo M m N A >. p U � U c N a) c CD O d O O d N N N N E a (n NN « O y y -c O M (D A C E 0 m m C O E E -o CD In ) Eac E — ` Mm `Q � pm m O L 10 yO ° c o > a c c LEc N o m a E my « m m C o o ? d oa c N E U °�— c Q�> 9 m C O C L m '> p, 0 E w N C V _E m m N N V V y N N d 3 d o A o 7 0 0 m ` N E C y d y N a d w G O m C r O m pt a .m.. U m O E m m c a m aa)E p �arnm Ec p U -oma�m Nm s m v E> W o E y Q)(D aoiacc > O m a E Iii 8> M lD 0 oQ° r� o ca t5ma) ° mid f-m= FN 0 CNUmoalL Hja- U co U) w O cu cu cu co Q C co 0 U C E fE O CL C cz- O U L O U L CO LO O U a> w N cu CE C U) V! O t V y cm L S, 3 C a a O O N m O O N <a o0 N O h O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N L NU NC1� NU N N NN W N_CO N_O N O T N � °o c N E N N N N o O N O m O N E o v N W N 'O_ W W W U co CJ O O q O O A A N N O O O O O O N O O O O O O C O C O O C O N O 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 E B 0 E B (h N E rn 0 O N O 0 0 O N 0 0 N O ap (p V N U N U N U ap o c o c o c N= E B m O N O W O W W W C �N r C f1 r O U N CO N n W W N [O [+1 O O O N C O N C O N C N E � E o E Evoi N C C W j W W o U o U O o U O NEO NE Z NE,� Em f=.1 N E� A ET- O N N O m E O W W W d 'i W S, 3 C a a O O N m O O N <a o0 N O h O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N L N � W N O T � °o c N o d E o v N N 'O_ W U co O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (h N N 0 0 S, 3 C a a O O N m O O N <a o0 N 0 O O L U U) L m O i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N � W O U o d o v N 'O_ U O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O ap (p V N S, 3 C a a O O N m O O N <a o0 N 0 O O L U U) L m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S, 3 C a a L CL t ,W o-j m _ d E 0 L _ W 0 s co L a a _ O _ as 0 as 2 j _ k \ ) M0 }a / «tom§ ] �, \f�\kj§ k, / «� ƒ) })) E N C a)g2,_ �. . 3AIf32a zA23#Ie/ §§ C f r �( ) ■ N �I 5 3 )I ! _ \a 0m § , E 5) � *( / /) \! /� 0 mm ® } }{�$ /� -2. } aa=,; /)t\;f 0 a « -0v� ° |ƒ « =ƒ§$E «||+_ $ 20 z0 caEj2 «i a2fJ)G «,33=3$ ■ - _ ) f¥ ) § !I § 3 £I s I ■ /) 0cU) }E N) -j U) 22e �U�t k ZI s 3 )# §` " ±!«, C-4 ca )\z2aoe 2 E«))§[| /k a« -d2- - {AAJ]JE2** �} \ � �, ! ! /�i _ \ , \ e.0 0 �«})) *(k�k{ / {£)£]=I]Ei c c E} \ Mu - CD m \\ LU E k \ ) M0 }a / «tom§ ] �, \f�\kj§ k, / «� ƒ) })) E N C a)g2,_ �. . 3AIf32a zA23#Ie/ §§ C f r �( ) ■ N �I 5 3 )I ! _ \a 0m § , E 5) � *( / /) \! /� 0 mm ® } }{�$ /� -2. } aa=,; /)t\;f 0 a « -0v� ° |ƒ « =ƒ§$E «||+_ $ 20 z0 caEj2 «i a2fJ)G «,33=3$ ■ - _ ) f¥ ) § !I § 3 £I s I ■ /) 0cU) }E N) -j U) 22e �U�t k ZI s 3 )# §` " ±!«, C-4 ca )\z2aoe 2 E«))§[| /k a« -d2- - {AAJ]JE2** �} \ � \ 2 � t k / it / § k \ § LU 2 $ ) o c6 T ( \0 0 CD § )16 \ } \\ 2 &%2� & 77J/ / \Jk� 2 X77) I _E4r « kk }\ 3 ) /jƒ -:§ ƒ{ \ \ik=■ 1 # }J *.i»2; /\ /eElG2\§ TOy� / \ \ } \ } \ \\\ - \ \ / / ^- /& /� \ \ _- -� - - -� � \ ) 0 / \ 0) k { \ / {E CN \i )\ k _ \ r/ c / Ej t/ « § ) 0 ,a ƒ )E k ) 2�- 2 �) k k[ /( E 4 2] 2; / ) o c6 T ( \0 0 CD § )16 \ } \\ 2 &%2� & 77J/ / \Jk� 2 X77) I _E4r « kk }\ 3 ) /jƒ -:§ ƒ{ \ \ik=■ 1 # }J *.i»2; /\ /eElG2\§ TOy� / \ \ } \ } \ \\\ - \ \ / / \} \ \\ \\ { ^- /& /� _- -� - - -� \} \ \\ \\ { 0 0 t y t d r d O N G_ .G C a Ti R O `c E O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N to O Y] O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O rn O N W = O � N r 0 N O N 0 N O N rn O N W d °0 9 N c O G O N O N O N 0 N 0 N R O C N r O r W 0 N G Q O ,N O H G (.l v Q U �u LZ m a N G t � � v C O O � d (D O M � d F- h rn m M u7 N M aF d d a c m K F A 'n T r vi -- A _ N d A m d CFi m W rn U d a p a N V 10 d d y0j N o m O !� m U � !mQ rsil pNp � N L a c m v 9 d M M m rn M r N m r c a h � @ O rn � w f & � $ v E- N m a N G t n O 0 0 N w O rn a p C N N d Q m, 0 _N O N NIA � N I C d E m d � N O Q O m�NA •O O d N V] l(J � N� N N c p E � Q w �'m m m m N m r iy SIN ON r u� m r Q m mm N c � d o E 0 W I Id V Oi[%J � � r0 V MiViOmmi N c d VI 63- N N [O N N 0 N O E V o E O ry 2 LL U N m r � f7 iiNVV 'ii f0 O Nfny 8 B�, W i� S W V V W y N~ d L � C IV d 2' Z m d! o � (7 W o O V= d d d d d C V b p n aEi aEi o o E E N o C9 U w w U' C7'I w a m Z e a ..I O O C N Z 2 CD co v E a E E ti jz oa) C n a a> > w y a c w > m o O o a a > a CD J N a T _a a co a aT ° E = mU E U 0 N _w o O C O C WW C N 0 N N C N N m N d O n N 00 c U C O U O U U' L Z f6 ? N 6 m N 6 t° � y E E V N W V d �U Z as m c� a C C G C O E� vo° E :2o° w— m oL 0 W i? W U' w U' N 0 C C f0 C O n O 001 C � N n rJ O a a co 3 v L N C o E 0 Z C 66 °O m c N E E C C d N O O O O r L N 2— N Q w N c N 3 a W co a N C c t N oU a c a z a d O O O V1 Z O N L U = O u W U C O N d d 0 y Y (n R �0 N N a m C m 'M C C A C c O a � -- a E = E 0- C9 U' N W V W 0 N w O rn a p C N N d Q m, 0 _N O N NIA � N I C d E m d � N O Q O m�NA •O O d N V] l(J � N� N N c p E � Q w �'m m m m N m r iy SIN ON r u� m r Q m mm N c � d o E 0 W I Id V Oi[%J � � r0 V MiViOmmi N c d VI 63- N N [O N N 0 N O E V o E O ry 2 LL U N m r � f7 iiNVV 'ii f0 O Nfny 8 B�, W i� S W V V W y N~ d L � C IV d 2' Z m d! o � (7 W o O V= d d d d d C V b p n aEi aEi o o E E N o C9 U w w U' C7'I w a m Z e a ..I 0 0 t v H t V d a O C7 N O d C N C C C a 0 O e lQ 1 A N U I O O O O O O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m f0 V N 0 0 0 0 0 0 lA V (+J N r O N O O N O N m �°o N 0 0 N O O N O N O N m °o N e, m i o BN 00 � N N O N 0 0 rn N A o C o N O 3 N W O N C Q G O N O .q h G U A U LL N v 3 C z IF � d N F M ti A # F- N 0 A fOj � C ' H Off: to a A A U C LL d y A d U a o S2 LL fURR1 N � N ` a 2 � LL pp 3 fn fA m V I F C6 O N d ZD CO V O to UD 0 d A U H o q o d c c N c c N N v 3 C z 0 v Q 0 o ° o 14 h _O1 W U O a1 O N ,G C 'a y C 0 R a CD E 0 w ca y C 0 i m v N C O U rn c c m -.m y o° L V N m v C O d N aCi c ° @ > vi — O o° a) 0 m'2i N N O C C U > > a L U E m () u) O m O m Un W 'O r O)p tm Z' Q O cu dE 'c of o mE of ?� o. am ma W ° — o w o rn w o y U w L U = tp +L+ ° y 3U 3 oa m O_ N Z' N N N 3 O U U m c C m c O O Ny O y EW m E U C C (D O a O m Y m E N GO O O T a) m U a) a 0 a y d — aGi J O) > O > O ; O _ m O Y O N d C O d N _W m J > O t m i ' Go ° a o6 NO W W - W N (pa Y W .1a U) a) W m cJ m c m w Omm am c cd C y -2 d° voE m`o iE %o O• y _N W J y z 2 > L > m O y O J E �a O U >n G m m o U a) C7 m S m ` o C C d ) C 0 O G 0 p (n a ° N aOD L = L E L c ° 3 `m (D 3m aE m o N N 2— ° c E 0 Z a N E a c CD c m F EUn O.0 ON C G ° ? O O a N W O 'C C 'O m a G ° m s w o m a O :L ' O C y Q r CL —°o I ° i 3 N 0 Q W 2 U d U) 0 N y W O O C m y o= i �( aa) U� c 2 as E = a t r x E E V ° ao U� z O a W I Fa CCD N y R C of a' m m m U z o u z o z > > > .�d m rn d �.c'J�- � o A � NO •� N � o N m o m rn A N W OIL N e- �NitN [7 <O m N tO 'f7 M N v dd •O O ��y �- m NilfJ y [+f m�N O O- N m E r m op. O� O m�MR tm w CIE vi�.o N N O m O�Omi � [m0 b Old Ol o A 0 N o � d Q O DOE N w U � A I w I m � E w JE m m a w a 0 m c m mai N c7 Z O m w Z >> a 3 a ,C 0! O 0 t v H U_ V 0 d C Q N C C 'a Ti Q 0 N O 2` 6 N �71i N N A O O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [O N Q (7 N 0 N O N °o N O � N n O O N O N N O N m °o N O d o �N c O i N O N 0 0 N O N A °o C N r � 8 W O N C 0 N 0 H C v m ma V �L n v N c C Q Off' y N p W� ~ F A # F N o d O in 2 C, LL d U N N N w d mina `- g d [D (+J N (O N FJ rn Ego A d d rn N� rn rn m� rn 'r3 .L r n - l �= C N w a o 0 r d N W L V q N F o O. � N `O iO rn 0 p Y 6 (n (A Z O m J Z>> n v N c C Q e W O C V h Of A a C a 0 a� O N G L' k N c O m CC E 0 otf L O V d v N L u U W C �C c �a �u IIi O 0 L V fn V c 0 E N O 0 L V 'O c O d V1 O c 0 m E c Q) c c OE CL CL N y o O 0 0 0 0) O 0 t 0 U L L pu) 2 a� L '3 0 mg ma a� L a`m c m 3 rnE aci a) N Z 0 cu nW �� E O m O m 0 0 m m c @a U za a E E 06 O`O �a o m N O(n N.O O 0 Nw 0 c l0 c N c c« D O 'O O .00 J O. c NO >'O Vi O y Ow ON 0 0 D C r I y O W c c a 0 o N o O 3 L N a s n E U W U Uj 0 O p W (n 3 `0 to aci E 0 C N 0 c N 0 c O UI 0 0 E w p `.-°ao 00 UW 0T Z, aw mN W W U) oo L i 2 p�fn m� � r r E E 0 a) o w ° n E E c c U a 0 c O o O c 0 O 00 O C W ` a N t � O O N N a 00 O o U tD co', vi 00 N U) N L O M L c O 3 o w T p °n tD r mOM rn eDo 0= N N-0 U 'I- 0 mw E W 1 0 W U o 0 o m � � U Ww y Eve �m W 0 0 O 0 O U 0 0 0 N O C > c N N ya ° E °3 c a U aN `c Oa to _W a' N N a N 1 N = o y c 1 a c N 'p 0 _ :O c W z On E y m _6 a 00. W O W 3 N y ` W E '(D E L '•E ad v m a u V w L, O U) a L) 3 C A J S 0 L N E o o E 0 mg ma a� U U t U O U c r a C C L O m O m 0 0 m m o o �irng m m o r M m .n W r � y I� N NN m N � N O R •-- Vhf Y�f N `c r N N c N,, M`I� OMB r m NW U W N QIO N mIMIN m NNN Ni�m v N N Nj r'�,� w- l��j i 2 p�fn m� � r r 0 N O N M N N pryy W N C � N I E O r r O O) Of N �O Ip N W ` � N�O� N N oN TIN tD Ew I r °' = p °n tD r mOM rn eDo M W + m VJ (V tV �ly NIN C: O IM N 0 O iL w W V w L, O � O o v 2' Z' N E~ o O LO E E � I M mr il0 0�www � °-E �° a w 3 C A J 0 0 t U h v d a v d G N G G G m 'a Q 0 N O 6 m O O O O O O N O N 0 N m L O MM s 0 N N O N ° N O N � d N '4 °o N O N N 0 N 0 2, N � o G o d c°� W °o N N Q O G O G_ t ti 1� m N U LL a 3 r G Oi z N c * u g d ~ F A � H N h d A � V5 _I — K y VO N A A pp 2 U m m d m.0 d O m M N V C'. M U N O N N - C C m 4 Eyf O c p� pp pp L � � F c � h m � w � w 0 y u O N y N g N On N p E N N % O E Y E g O C m m. fA niO. V U U W W to a 3 r G Oi z o o b o t v O) d a V O m LO LO G N t. RI a H 0 r U h M C d J N C O R C E E O V IY N C O E in Q o Q n � U C CC_ N C O d ) 'O O A U a tt 0 L 3 L N l0 U 0 y m c E � O � C C n N N E O U O G p_ O m c U C W a N Op c Z N O N C O L C U 0 f11 � Z 0 C 0 E C tq W ¢ N w A W w o O o a to C N E O C N C O Ol C N L O Z 1 to S d U C to m C /V N O E O 1 N of L S N c a N C E °o E N U n z m° NNN��mi�� o M MIA N Eo E W _ O M N Mr C ,.0 0 E m v p Nm'e U N W g Orl tD N V AL •O' INS M^ 5 so r rH e w _ NIN N � r r C �+Njb c o. E E N`c O 111 W I Ni.. C Ir d o E rn < pad r Ni O Q n^ N N V N C r O m r NIN W 2 O Eo W V O E O Nw aOD m r NIN m r WiN N r. Nm i N W � z o v w m w o O � N O o fY o tj c y ma�i'a viwa 3 0 e e 0 0 v y d 0 U O m d O N C a 4 R 0 N O D Q U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O of (O O N 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N 0 N m L O � N 0 N O N O N m o° m d N c O C N N O O N O N o C n �f O S N W O N N G Q Q N O h G v fl a U v N 1r" c a e jp N � U N Ol LL'l V tp _ F F M m m pJ N Yt $ o O m o m 0 m m {p � 2 y � m N V (p N F N N y m C�li U N O aD ao r 0 m N U CL o_o d w a fs- c 00 a 6 6 o rn N � N LN v N 1r" c a e N � O O = V ti L Of R 2 0 m G N G G G 4 Q 0 a N C 0 LD C d E E V ca N C O m N C O U rn c c R Zu N O O V m a C V CD In _N O O L V N A C d E d C 0 C N O C G0 L I y w (L Y J C m E O G N O 0 O 2 N c f0 L U O z 1 fn S N d a A 2 E4 N = E ° O � C � C O Go G D) C � N C L N U U z O 1 z co W to c w 3 G N A V O C_ m O L a U) N r C ca m d ma) m a) L Z' N C _ O m d C 0 IV :- L � 3 m N C N O N N 'O Q) O C a E I 0 (n C N fA 0 m c CL mg No � w °w C (li E 0 C N O c O I y d 3 is N C � N r n E _ O U m v � r r o o a m a r tz N I m I N C ! � o m O E N� O yy N t0 C Nil y {r V w I m I d o in n m r o Eq o N — � Q C d ' O E N I � W C d I c E� ° °� W N C y p N T p�j V l(J O V, (O M O O aN� O , O m 1ff In �C2 w Ol N e{ i F O m E E 0 fA z w c9 �'� � a° N'w a 3 v O e Oi zl 0 0 U y t {Zp O G N G .G a 4 0 N O U N U u O O O O O o o � o N N o O O O o O O O O N 0 0 0 o O o N N N O N O N O O N O N m �°o N 't 0 0 0 N O O N m 0 0 N m d O T N cS. O c m N 0 0 0 N O N N °o C N {V 0 N N G Q 0 :3 aN 7 h G v 1� ad Q U �L M v N C Oi J OI q t H # L O O O N O O _C F m N CJ N N Y� rn dry U � � dl U 3 � N m C v S � h N AT d m d � N rn E c d G G C o - y a m c rn ti � c O N 2 w 'D d y M v N C Oi J � o O = h t _Ol x Y O G N G C A 4 u Q N C O c CD O d w N C A a) C U O) C c C 1V %■ wi a i EN m m V UU L r8 p N U N N I o r O ¢ m G a NiN N< O m W m a7 m m N o E N y Ny � o m m rn nl w` �2 I N I o E r ai N� h N r� V 0 Ni INO O �2 m SIN o N 'c W N ` CId I E N m� rn m m � m r NW 00 m n n r� vri N C r °° o E� 0 w lie I- o f to N r d m m O' d G E Q W gg W � r I I i I Y I `v L W w R F '� y W 0 p� d yN Z. W O W o s~ c °� C) A N O O O d q~ ci pi dJ U E E v m J c= did E lcn w x a > w,� 2 3 C Of m` m o A m Y U � c,6 CO r N aC 0 'aU C O U y y L U CL N p C aF 'U a N aU m U Ua1 ' C E E "p m E a) 00— Z Z W�:t Z �.oc o E Ih L U) oo °c) 0 n L C� o� E W 3 O @ N N'3 N p "Di C C C C C O C O C CU -oE ai c acE 'o y`ay cam CL a� a) Nw aa)a o''o o `o p 3 n o o ° a, o r O ` ( c p ' O m m C U O N L �m-C OO d O p N a m 3 0 a'np m� v<Oa) -0 ama� Q w Q r a o m d a w I d a w d w a a w: y L_ E .� N m O> N N Y O O A O` o N O Fo O m m r_ E r o ,d p E o c ID 0) �Ua y(pN c d Ot p Ua cLp m'- >aD — 5) > 0 O =Qm a7Y Ja.Y aQm > m IL C-4 w �3 a) ° a v c E c E o o m o � a m S ? aEi (D a c a) N d a) p0 o `m _ @ ` m CD >1 `o) m a 0 m L 'p r co ONi N A E v O O 1 O i Q c w O N— °o C N @ p a c C (D E E c6 al O O N a) N 66'2 a) O y _N oQ o L ootp L_ .3 U N t`a oo a o w yI- ID ID r- C C p)a L Z` a m O Y ma) cca .3�c I as U 'y y E N O O Z3 m 002 Q) 75-00 O o m V CD U r C V cc u tao y c (n E N ) d m@ a .`w'- 2 1 2 E N N Q y C u O p_ p pd c o t E £ a _ £ ¢ 's 0 mv) r .c w mU) wi a i EN m m V UU L r8 p N U N N I o r O ¢ m G a NiN N< O m W m a7 m m N o E N y Ny � o m m rn nl w` �2 I N I o E r ai N� h N r� V 0 Ni INO O �2 m SIN o N 'c W N ` CId I E N m� rn m m � m r NW 00 m n n r� vri N C r °° o E� 0 w lie I- o f to N r d m m O' d G E Q W gg W � r I I i I Y I `v L W w R F '� y W 0 p� d yN Z. W O W o s~ c °� C) A N O O O d q~ ci pi dJ U E E v m J c= did E lcn w x a > w,� 2 3 C Of 0 0 v y d E 0 d N C .0 a 4 d IO 1 U u O O O p O N �lJ O UJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 N m 0 N m O N r O O N O N N O) O N m m O T N S. r N 0 N O N O N O O N O C A O g1 W 0 N e Q e r H G U Z' m q V v N t C OI �I O N O - •� L H N d� � � a w a r N a a V m r d U CL 2 � N ti o w c N H d O OI O) O1 mV d O - N � � N G O - N P �N O W w t m w N d W O O O O O O~ V d m m u E E W v N t C OI 4 Q 0 N a V wl a a� a W 00 0 d c 0 N 0) G G G a 3 d 5 e t a u1 N m L a -- E wo C w .N. N a) � a o o ti uJ T O - N N L C U p o Z m A a y o 0 E :2 m £ 0 o v -- 0 oZ U r ad t C O U > V O E O ~ oU d d O 0 C N C V O N m O O d > m O) t O= > C U 1p N a) a m `o a �i w a E 3 d 5 e t a N r Y CL. d a Uj W 0 d_ N G .0 a 0 0 t _rn S q w C W Q 0 N 0 .y H C_ t A N U �l n V 3 m G A ,a L, Lv s o L -- NI` A � N # � d jut O o 1O 2 a 2' ti m L O � a N � Z H h N v A •V. D! LL ml c .5 r q' U v 65 y C LL. U d m5 c C N U N a LL N a LL v v ca ) 6 d A d d a i j � € m � o+ g -F3 o N C U 0 > - . fq W n V 3 m G A ,a O O V h E Q G m m •U a h d O N G G m a C O m V 7 W C d a 3 y N C O CL V X W m WN 3« >, aY�-O J (n O N N N O Z' W C O O L= O > C E ° ay o -am°)rn E ° y ° C c o ago rad�o.m om Od ° c w o o)m m E m X y�H y `o m R `m n a) d m E > F m a E f' mia N = 0 m m N c p E m Y _ o y E s22 Um 3L w ) w - j W y O E T d 0,!=Q) .= m Sa .O a m y J i0 C m Q N d axi? �mLCO omUma o 0-0 ID C O J ` 0 o E d m J m a w C a m UO W m 0I y n U) E C c c °i�w U �, rno W 'X .. n d ME X a d _ U 0 m m a) y C L E 3 m y m a c d J r fn pLm m Er 5 c c oC) p:= —_ m �� o y 0- ° o -mo s� 3 > mr� a) J m 0 U m C m c U 202 d 0 O U y O E m p O °.y EEcc ° aa) > nn r a O' O J y U m m m m C rV ° to X y t`n o f X >� L E 'O E a d mEEm °-O WLy O�` d O x adi y m d Um (n o= ° °m o o me Omaa�m ta�,a 3 y is C a) c> V 0,0 (Ua m O m ,Op C y n m ° -p U y cm y C N O aO OmyyyC EEEy m E.0 Ca cc J U 0I y 0 0 2) m.C. m O) U d •d O J O p y L L id m U y L p J SI U L a L m U U d L U a m X ya) F- `a00ya I-`LO- aa) F- W C r c m d U C J 0 E 0 T °w m o a o 0 U 0 na U E j L L 7 N o � L N d O L N Ud o m n nm n a a- U y -m E `mom 'y aa) m o = -d U O O N a) a) y N y -QC L O .m m L Q a C d �(D y 3c J ai .d O d a) > 0 m m a > L Q L .Om O m? m a O 0) _ O m � o�c = � " my O N yy 3a) m a E V? O m E L h i L W 0 N m a ° m 0 d o _ N y .t � C m y t' d O W T m `) 0 N O y a ) a ° a a a O N v m i CL 0 W L O N E , A y p U O J L - o m O d m n a .? m d y N - -0 C W N U y (D w ) E a 0 m m C 6 a C O m O 0 i m U> C y Y O W p m U O C m O a x N y t - m O LU W O m d O O m W ° o o. ` E . 0a o m E maO E Ep o m a o > a) o ° c E o -o ) a moo d u N U a O G yD O p d N n _ > o N CL N 0 Lp m U 0� o' a E ` py O C p O L O� m y M U .0 > w a) C O m` O d p, IDy m m O d ZC_ U a m a\ U U LoC o� 0o a N N U y m N X O O (o N m W a p O° W a 'o 0 ° o a 2 L C N y O W CO O N a N n o a C U j U 'L 0 Em N 0 p y E y ?^ m 6 y C y O ° o 0 o m >a a a _ � U d y O H p U p m U U y N m a O O 5 U m 0 m N (CD 6 N U m y d e o o a o o e 6 V W NL6 .4� vi e a e (� (V M "i ci M V N m N N M O N r d E m o — N° 4 m N m C m n M m °a v a W r Lr W rn m o a) N (D N N M N V W N N vi cD co co co # d m m M N # d N N N N N N N C r c m d U C J 0 E 0 T °w m o a o 0 U 0 na U E j L L 7 N o � L N d O L N Ud o m n nm n a a- U y -m E `mom 'y aa) m o = -d U O O N a) a) y N y -QC L O .m m L Q a C d �(D y 3c J ai .d O d a) > 0 m m a > L Q L .Om O m? m a O 0) _ O m � o�c = � " my O N yy 3a) m a E V? O m E L h i L W 0 N m a ° m 0 d o _ N y .t � C m y t' d O W T m `) 0 N O y a ) a ° a a a O N v m i CL 0 W L O N E , A y p U O J L - o m O d m n a .? m d y N - -0 C W N U y (D w ) E a 0 m m C 6 a C O m O 0 i m U> C y Y O W p m U O C m O a x N y t - m O LU W O m d O O m W ° o o. ` E . 0a o m E maO E Ep o m a o > a) o ° c E o -o ) a moo d u N U a O G yD O p d N n _ > o N CL N 0 Lp m U 0� o' a E ` py O C p O L O� m y M U .0 > w a) C O m` O d p, IDy m m O d ZC_ U a m a\ U U LoC o� 0o a N N U y m N X O O (o N m W a p O° W a 'o 0 ° o a 2 L C N y O W CO O N a N n o a C U j U 'L 0 Em N 0 p y E y ?^ m 6 y C y O ° o 0 o m >a a a _ � U d y O H p U p m U U y N m a O O 5 U m 0 m N (CD 6 N U m y Z O O t V cc W zo C Y m a = O E C D C -0 Y N o N = (n m a �. o m° y h rn y m m 0. N N N N co a 0. CL j >..L.. m L m E o E ' rn 0 o o m c o N E 0-E o L 4)N i ct � o -0 0- E o u -'N 0 C .� MO— w 0 E m c d U p a"i p L -O C V o C o m N c p lS O W L O C � O C` a) m 0 U N a'- y m UL >.-0 y c c-5 N 0) ° E 0 0WF m o- Ew m U m 2 o m p� v 0 001 —' U -=p N v C i0 0 O— C— @ O K- 0 V W m O U n j N m r E V! N L N 'N Ul H I! -O O 0 0 a f1 w d m p L C U) " N W d C O-OL OU U NUN y"p0 N m C m N E m N N Y m (6 N 0 N w O Y m a m`o0- (6010 •. m fLN,N o New amm NO m N C > C a) `O C L C C p N O 'N U m m m m N r N `1 o m c O 3: c0 N H O N U N C J c -O (6 O. Z O E N E c c rn _O W U p C a o C O .m W m CL m 0 f1 N r U U> m E N x'p10o`NCLi W U Jw(n mx-o2 -�omcCo U N U N N WCO m U m m m L N w N c'V m E w � `L, N m N `o " D c N 'v1 ti 7 C .0- ml N 0— E U U d p 'p L U N i4 N G— �y N 'O U > m N C C O N m C Y c N C L E f N L E S 6 O C d .3 N Vi N "O .L. L c L Z C O N M m E C 0 V y o N 0 U N N J m m m N C N'C N L M UN CD 'a m ? 0 -0 N N Y U m U C) ° > �Em m 2 U O O. m� = W o 'OL j N >E m N p E a) 0) c cm O E U L O N N N >` 0 N O U C U N U E 'n v ac) E o N � � CC a`) 'c N N 'a `0 �- - 0 � y �, O .O o. i >> m C L O -0 N rn N N 'O 8. N N 2 0 C A W o m 'N" O d N U tO 'O m m O V O C m N c N N N U O N m - a O p a N m F- m c'N - j Q 0 y 2 0 m tm G7 -O O c Ct N 'a C C ui L N O y U y.o 'p C U m ��[ 0 > N -G � C N m. N N -Np O N N > W U d m m N fA v N 0 c d � N Lo C E Lo C m N Q 0 L0 O (6010 NO m N C c ln - pmr��N O W d D c N O p � � O L N Q U O 7 I N I I N N I N d a j m N m m m 2 m m m CD C O w C C N 0o N C o� m U= m N N V m° C t� N m a N U L O> y >(0 y N U � U N N L O' 2? N \ 0 N 0" Y m a o 2 m} U o d N C N !!1 O� N U O'L Q O C U F o E C U o — N C 0 0 Q d a V N C u A> 0 z o z i> o z i o z > CLL E E e N N h � Im N C E m 2 C O IL N a C ` E 0 O U N N N E O G N U >� V5 a m 0 (n L > y N -0 C ° U N m N C [L to d y c C ` Oc�N xo m E >� U C N C m co 3 U C CD L C m y m m ° O L Wzdain O N O a m H fA v v .O L IL N E L O C LO p L •- 0 a Q. L � N V 0 v .O L IL N O t V 3 as z m v� 5 G e N N LL o O 6 _ O U I m O O N �LL m C O N O N O N c I t•• to I 0 ad. m y C O A d I„ I it F+ CL N N u d N m jA C m m m W O d y N 1N m q a ILL es `fl � - I c.i O 3 = L O I U d D I O I. II H II (7 a` N � III O U U) N O E O 0 0 0 h 1 V -O -p 0 0 0 0 V (h0 w t O O N <W< Ol d 0 d W Z I E W O y m O V a O N N I d O C p III m d E O U) N III w C o N O o U Z IL C O N d o o c w y c m N C' as c a c o D o cu 3 yFr V= c� jp V O O V d ao C O C y c Y O O A a d d d m v� 5 G e IT o� o N O � d }O� I N � d S .o IL in i x o R «� A 1«p CL LM r 0 C .O O O i w o m N U U 4. G U W O L a L -_ N {q N N� N� I a }! c IL vi m C Y d y d rn O m [D N 0 CO N N � r7 O O 5 o U EE w C U) o 8 W Z U` j z t U U � Q V d O O W O7 n m Eo F o m d d C c vE t O O R d U F� ii O F N H ni IL a` a H 3 O! t a h N 3 m e a -.I O i LL to - O O O N N N O O I O L .. O O O O A 61 LL CD O u O C �I F i I U .� N a o v tq p 0 0 a` d o I LLI W � N G a A L d Ir y C i N i w y t0 O < "E O V t0 N O 0 < NN N N m [0 O i y � II o E O -(o I'I E A? W °o W Z C7 w `c U d N d O a 0 > m CD d ,aUi LL. a a - Ul _l h N 3 m e a -.I m 3 G O! ,.1 N LL (O o rn 0 0 o n QLq O N O L N O N N V m � N c N N N 9 0 i N R V j N O LLY sv a O L o 0 0 0 o f U) d d Z N A d h C y LL m A O d G ' c M 2 OW cOA � b09 bOS OI 9 C O d d d O N I ma H � C d m m N U uoi /Y O N N m m Y L1J V L V� i t0 d L N N W to O d c � ° o � E n 'Q rn Q d C m I Q Vy m e Q o O w co y a O n .ice.. T g ts o o ai O aic O A m c v E t` U ' O N y d i0- g a a a m 3 G O! ,.1 O U N Z m G f d d H J O L U L 9 O) Q fJ I N O i Y LL r � i O I I LL O I I N i i LL d O C O N C G_ 0/ d C 10 d d d Oi I N O i Y LL r � i O I I LL O I I N i i LL LL I `o_ I a` II i I O O C O d O Y W Oi LL O N �I C � N d U F- LL N O ^ N Cli LL �i to �i O O rr O � � t» ♦A � I LL I `o_ I a` II i I N 7 C U L C c ; E E m 0 y o E y L 2 N A A N d c d r Z o> c p L-. o •- o N � 0 C N J O o m c E a U E N Y U N J E No 0 0 U G J t° E v E (n N � � U CO O n O O O O O C N N N A CL d A N � 0 A �ryry iri O N p N N u m C � � a` o v ri N d J O O N C d d G C A d d 3 N I A T C � � O I � C U V C d Oa S ca Y C N N O = C d N Oil LU lz O to to V 7 r 3 C Ol e N C Q d W Oi iJ O N C C � d U F- LL N 7 C U L C c ; E E m 0 y o E y L 2 N A A N d c d r Z o> c p L-. o •- o N � 0 C N J O o m c E a U E N Y U N J E No 0 0 U G J t° E v E (n N � � U CO O n O O O O O C N N N A CL d A N � 0 A �ryry iri O N p N N u m C � � a` o v ri N d J O O N C d d G C A d d 3 N I A T C � � O I � C U V C d Oa S ca Y C N N O = C d N Oil LU lz O to to V 7 r 3 C Ol e OP -_ - - N W O N O O U Z m q N y d CL q c y a Co G n fA Vi N Ln O a d d at cc ICI I z m ¢~ N- TN NO >,oy UU a r > ppC c E o v 7�� O I E r y O F 0 0 of 0 mil 2 a y m m uj �yI U J O fn M .c Z' a O O [O C U � O CD Z o m X C C aUi m° o N a O rn n o n y c G � � 0 CD d C � O O R m m W V d d d E N ' N G Oi J Q Y O N C O .,.. O C N O O r d Z f/) c O O C N N O O U 3 a� z ca N Q (O O E E Gi 6 F d 'o a N d j0 y C m m N C N U O 0 a c 0 U C d [n O . a. in U m p V W N N C r Cc O L m p :i E d II CD a a a a N O N LL 0 N 0 0 T LL 0 TO LL 0 m 0 O nj N 0 N Y LL M O D_ °m m o m E c ao� p c W pT� C C U E L d��LLs LQ I d l0 E cLi N O d d � N d C � O LL C a is E v y E d 8 L E (n U > G m � d a $ o � N N U � G O O C n � cOi N E N C a� �E m m p C N a d A D d j0 y C m m N � c d C a U C d U O . a. in U m p V 0 co V m L6 3 d a t Q i 0 N N I C � O C j N I O o p �� I CO C N N N Z c0 o I a Q > II (D LL d ' y OM OM o O O q O E o vi r 0 E o M w m c �Ivs tis I vi D N 6 Y o 0 C rL 0/ m q cc CL a� > N n IL C a tO O c0 d m O O Q �... _.. _. _ _ _ C.i 9 U d III O N O O N U O m o v d y y a '. Z (n ~ M w m U d N U Y d U G "v2i 33 _ w �j M E °„a E c m ' c E ', �I .�. t � E c t d O 01 D c w ICI y -moo co L� c G •+6 a rnm d� h c N. ..a: d . C DM p y s O'. ;o N w' O aMci a d d a U H LL 0 F�I O N E.0 c) mp a N C 01 O t V y J d N L C a Q O c E E Q 2` m U u 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 42 o N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a N O m m O N O O O O O O O O O O O N V m N 0 N O O O N O N 0 N O N 0 N O N m °o N m d o N r N O N 0 N O N 0 N A O C O N r °o N W 0 N C e y C V ryn U M 7 R C Oa e FN t0 (p N m N _ A t �! F H I � O m N 1� N w a IO N � O 3 r LLry� V rn (O C R' N N d d N C - C U d m m m rn m r N a n Y� m rn rn rn m °oN rn '6 d - _ N � C d F C C 6 O ' I N C W � o N d N a s y W W m N N UJ N� N� g C Y E h L T C n T C E M 7 R C Oa e 0 O C N N O U 3 CD Z m N Q O N m Y O E E aD C. H V d .O a N a C a C c a O E O m y C o c O w C a C d m a .. a� ctl N O d O U d O C E W c t6 _ L N d += N C dC CD .O •` Li W C. a a LL N LL 0 0 0 LL 0 o � O N N 0 0 0 LL LL a CL 0 q N Q N o r N N of i o � N Vj L_ °c' 3 C y U O U C a 7 C N m � U a Q o a � > a x ° c g C p � U a N .N a C C � a a N a aEi o � n n m � a � o d N W N o n c c o H ate' r r of 0 0 c o 0 � N N 4' O a C a c a E O m y C o c T w C a d m a .. ctl L_ °c' 3 C y U O U C a 7 C N m � U a Q o a � > a x ° c g C p � U a N .N a C C � a a N a aEi o � n n m � a � o d N W N o n c c o H ate' r r of 0 0 c o 0 � N N 4' O m Co 3 c t J a i m a O m y C o m N y C a m a .. ctl d O U N O m Co 3 c t J Ira § ] } ) k rL § f / } C0 = e� o k cz to �kk § \ tw ) 0 / / ) ( \ } \ k 0 � � ƒ k D Jk\ a w § 5 k \2f\ } \ } \k — .� ) E /\\ §)0 /() «k) \]ƒ \ \) \)\ §\f2 k } «■ ■ E _ f / } C0 = e� o cz to �kk § tw 0 ) ( , ƒ Jk\ a w 5 k \2f\ } \ } \k — .� ) E /\\ §)0 /() «k) \]ƒ \ \) \)\ §\f2 k } «■ ■ E _ k k � f ! C0 = e� o cz to �kk § 0 k k � f ! N �N O N LL O C y r N O d O III � I d I N O E d A E C C __- y H d d m y v cc G NO O •O N C L � c N IL °o I } I LL L O tm U $ t CL r N U d w - N C d E � W LU c woo WE r N E Y N d N ,� E c III m 7a O �-do v o W� I N m w 3 0 °a c s J c E O O A d U CL` a a y r�BH D a m c N 3 z c rn J �, 3 m f a c t a =1 N C O cu 0 O C N !/l O U N d Z (6 Q co O E E Q .O Q N O N LL O TJ O O i i� O I i LL i r r it o .ri I N N N N IO o I O i N LL O i a` r I Op o O m rn' O O N N C � A N U 2 � = w y w CI CD U W OI QI 0 N m CL c (6 La H LL O F- N E U1 W Y t4 O N O) O N GI N H CD ,G a d d 'C m a a a N O N LL O TJ O O i i� O I i LL i r r it o .ri I N N N N IO o I O i N LL O i a` L_ = c 3 C y U O U C � y � = N d m m = U o OF. � = d ° 0-8 = O � U d NC .y N E c 'O r r I Op o O m rn' m O N N N A y y v = � A N U 2 � = w y w CI CL` c U W OI QI L_ = c 3 C y U O U C � y � = N d m m = U o OF. � = d ° 0-8 = O � U d NC .y N E c 'O r r I Op o O 5 d O m A N A y y v = � A N U 2 � = w y w CI CL` c U W OI QI 0 c La H LL O F- L_ = c 3 C y U O U C � y � = N d m m = U o OF. � = d ° 0-8 = O � U d NC .y N E c 'O r r I Op o O = O O A I i J L6 3 c a i d A N A y y v = � A N U 2 � = w y w CI CL` c U W OI QI I i J L6 3 c a i N 3 Da c t A J 0 N > LL O � I N O N U � LL I N O N I Q LL I E m r C O O O W T d N U in N 0 LL a r � � O li � 0 0 0 -_ d yo LL 3 t � � m ° o N _ _ d T y ! r o C � _ � — _ y w .A. O O O' a T I O III K U N lO N a N u mN Y :1 O nc OO d � > f 0) C O o w m _ c c+= 2.1 0 o m a F', a ` a a 0 - H ii s Co E = oN� E 0 U N 3 Da c t A J C ._ � N � � O � .O � > N O � � .O � Q r 3 a �d N C O � I Ira > C C N I� 03 { E N N N 'C c O Ip d LL O Of Vi VNJ < O O � _N A C3 d q ctl CA m o in c t to O 0 0 F o a o � � d w0 U N fO N d � Q m n n E io u� N � c _. —_ t- E U CO m m a Yn W E N N O O 2 Sa 3 9 6 O Q O J C n c N O N C m a a E E o s A cc 0 E C \ d m g m r 3 a e a J p LL N C I O O C N I li m O O O I � C C a p a 0 c I a N Q IH LL A C Gi III I o I o N LL t U_ I 3 'O C O N IL Q a o o LU y d A c H E m o IL (7 <6 N C N I I N m O y y0 m O, w IV G 6 C31 m d J L e0 d U l- 11 O 1- OO w€ m y w e d d d e a J N N 1 LL to O .? O N 0 0 0 O) N N N C O N CD 00 d ., A C LL G G C W C L N d G U cn 0 I o V d O O iOl LC d LLfA M I Yi J 3 y C a N N U U) N tD [o X L d fA t9 j J � U C C C CD C d D E E m H -92 O w O N N w O U) w E s W a c d 21 LLJ n 0) .2) d O o c d O O N C ICO -0 O t H v ro d $' iw E i o t H 't-0 ' D .V N d N O € a H o d U c v o E o ¢i m H w a d d d a H m 1' U E m 3 c m 0 N N fn C O 0 C OJ C CD O E d N C O Q d .O a T r`n O) 0 m M v '� O C LL L U F- N O i O O f9 E9 69 .0. i, I LL O IIIaI y C Y M v ca N N � I I O ' i N C N O J J 1 d += N G C G m a` a` a N O LL O LL O Ni LL I I m r`n 0 m M v '� N LL G d C dO) N d O' � c W M U A O U W N U C d E m E ° U O a c m O � Q � o A � N C A � y c 'm C U O N d A d O m d r D N C N iri O N p, C 'gyp d D U fq m__ O a a �L U L _OI U C U d Y lV 0 C d O J 3 U ; OIL C � L � V 'o `a O cc c J r`n m M v '� N O i O } f9 E9 69 IfA i, I LL O IIIaI v M v N N � I I ' i G d C dO) N d O' � c W M U A O U W N U C d E m E ° U O a c m O � Q � o A � N C A � y c 'm C U O N d A d O m d r D N C N iri O N p, C 'gyp d D U fq m__ O a a �L U L _OI U C U d Y lV 0 C d O J 3 U ; OIL C � L � V 'o `a O cc c J N C O O C Ol CD -o O E C O CL Q d H v d a r °o Y LL O d p o 0 0 vs M m s» a d C 0 O 0 O Q C O 0 � O O O �N O O C M fA 0 0 a X O � O W W «n e» E O S 0 0 !o i 0 0 0 i� 0 O O L q O O U o O m m O O III W 8 U) d N C °- j t a C d fj d C A IL` a a r °o Y LL O d p o 0 0 vs M m s» a d C 0 O 0 O Q N O 0 � O O O N O O LL M fA 0 0 N O � O W «n e» O S 0 0 !o i 0 0 0 0 ' 0 O iOO q O O N o O m m O O III 8 0l r °o Y LL O d p o 0 0 vs M m s» a d C q A Q C3 C d Oa N q N G ` d N y W m o v es p C V m t0 N yO G N a O E 8 U N N N E E pJ `a C U N g1 N O Qq N S O q M; ,.`° M q ° r m M o 0 m o 0 C N N a d C q A v q n y � � C C3 C d Oa C N G ` d N y w C m o v es p V C Q E n �i c N c O q T d O d N N 3 a c a z S G 01 pl LL fA O � I O > � I C (O O E N � ILL i I N I I ' C w C. IaD,� in N d .ice O •O` N N N N O (7 D_ O L) (/J O a C V FFII 1� N Vi N EA N in O N N N N N r O O to M O t9 O to LL E I � I i N U c L 0o I I I o E C Z 2 E c E ! SL E T .c y � o m I 2 a v~ o r° S N a a a a`0 S G 01 pl N N 3 a e ..1 -_ N TI O N Y � I C 9 O r r O N N n N .- m O O O C m cO I h O V> O f9 O t9 O N3 Q d Q N m m G I G N VJ O V d Q w IT o o u c v G V p d O f a in v m QQ LL i a` i V� I 0 N I p m E 0 3 N y o � � E E � Q O _ U C o o o E O W U U) c o C ON O m y O _ N G tri L C Oi R N t6 r C :� S' 0 'o k- p) rn d j V V E G c N °c d A'' V '. °' c V tM E 0 CD d o c x m a� N N 3 a e ..1 a N N I y I � O O c m C d O E CD CD N O Q C. F- d 'o a N (/j � M O �[i N LL , � M I� o 0 0 0 > I LL A I o.rn Y � q N Q C N� C n y I LL � III C Iieyi __ ey 4J en a` T w � O V �_ n2 d o N o U J o 0 C N N N M A �O O CO - ISO L OJ d N � N E � _Ol M m E M > C CD _ N N E d E c m a O N G cm CD d C T A IL a a N (/j � M O �[i N LL , � M I� o 0 0 0 > I LL A I o.rn Y � q N Q C N� b n y I LL � III C Iieyi __ ey e» en a` T O � O V �_ n2 C of o 0 0 N o w J o 0 C N N N M A �O O (O - ISO c C N OJ lD N � N d � N M m � W C N (/j � M O �[i N LL , � M I� o 0 0 0 > I LL m c A I o.rn Y � q N Q C ILL b n y u c � N � C N N N C U> a` T LU � O V �_ n2 C �_ N o w q 4] M pN� v IM p (�O OJ lD N ... N d d N t m c A I o.rn Y � q N Q C I b n y u c � N � C N N N C U> 0 T LU � O V �_ n2 C �_ N o w III a v � LL o �O A I Y � q N Q C I n u c � N � N N N C U> O UI > G N t O d N � N N N C U> � C � O V n2 C N o w � w c m C N n ... N d d N t C CD _ N N E E c m a O 0 a N d N N N N U O N ryd U N O N 0 m m E 0 a 3 e N h N 3 c t ,OI i I N N ' LL N C O > O p N N -O o p I N 0 N W TILL A N V C G N fn 2 d FOo 0o u d c O y y = 1 p (p O O 0 O 0 W N d f Ny CO W a o c) co fn Hi V j OOI N N 5 O` E ° E > E E a "O LL I w 4J C 3 N y U m m W O O A S S I m O O a p A N N I O C v a= t m N = n y d 2 y c 0 0 a Z O w X Q m iOo o OD O D W d 0) c EP w c�i co 0 00 79 d d C � O O W LR a U~ ii U Fes- O m a"i y c d d d c� a�i Q 2 I1 �, �Nb o oo N h N 3 c t ,OI i V H C � � ,O d � � � C .� C - � C � Q V N h Ul C O O C N a c t0 m c m C Q f0 U d T H V d .O a a 0 d m N N A D N N N d C p W o �o F- u UQ Z 0 2 d 0 0 0 0 m o (Ni M 2 � } n d LL to I(a g g o U f= °- rn N N rn a } N c C d m � O O cc a a a d c arn � c W O a N C d U LL O N O O] O C_ d d y c E d c Q E N O d E d � 3 3 C 'y c m m o a o 0 v c o m p p Np c E c c d E p0 .2 y o N U y C n. p d 7 N d C C d o � d d � m 0 m O 0 d N N N A D d q N N d iLL � G N o �o u 0 0 2 d 0 0 0 0 m o (Ni M } n LL to I(a g g o U o m rn N N N } N N LL M M O O O LO O LO O O N } N � v LL v V3 fii °o °o m o 0 o � N N LL} Vi Vf O N N N � � LL to pM O O O O IL 8 O d c arn � c W O a N C d U LL O N O O] O C_ d d y c E d c Q E N O d E d � 3 3 C 'y c m m o a o 0 v c o m p p Np c E c c d E p0 .2 y o N U y C n. p d 7 N d C C d o � d d � m 0 m O O N 3 c OI e d A D d q d � � � G N N u N fq 2 d cty m v' G U O N 3 c OI e C O O G C tV U c IQ C N C cu .Q U aL Q F d .O a C o N N po O d O E O q 8 � C W Z, c 0 -SR S °o o � � m m 03 yL C � O 0 0 LL I F- U) V d r N G_ z ti C_ ) d C 0 0 A CL n. a O N N � r O N 0 o O O : O i N N N [o O 0 0 A O O I O O O LL b N O O O 0 0 Hi M o N O po O d O O O q � C W Z, c 0 o to S °o o � � m m O N N � r O N 0 o O O : O i N N N [o O 0 0 A O O I O O O LL b N O O O 0 0 Hi M q N O L — C q q oLL d E c q q m c o d a q d � d U d N d d � Ol C c d gE r c n q d p p U U _N C d C L d N y C U O � � Y � d � o U � h y � d C O C d q d D) � q � C W q c of m 7r, S d .c � 4 E2 yL q N O L — C q q oLL d E c q q m c o d a q d � d U d N d d � Ol C c d gE r c n q d p p U U _N C d C L d N y C U O � � Y � d � o U � h y � d C O I II Id I N c c d C q Q U C ! d O I, c L: ' m V� 0 c N N n p O� e q d � q � 0 q c N y d E2 � V I II Id I N c c d C q Q U C ! d O I, c L: ' m V� 0 c N N n p O� e { 2 / I } \ 1 2 \ } \ \ a. ƒ §k/ k CL >1 cts Ci e ■tea ) } �j / � \ ��( f) \ / � - I7 ;f! ( - _ )tƒƒ/ 2 \ _ §0 - ) eeee$ k7 ®92 § 2 �fr2f\# ! ) ƒ - U) _ � ' a« 0-6 12 m r � P: * �222�\ » . ; _ \ CD ..a ` E =aee! §/ =■ �Ef §±y\ f ■ # ® J= cp - .!_� cc aI ■f27f ) ,�® CL { N C O .j O G C im U c m CD C m m Q U CL CD O a m G O O u7 o o° Z 0 0 O N N N -o p o Ipi v iv g ui ui N rn m LL C6 ill 0 0 ' p p I p� O o d 0 to o 0 I O m o O p N � O N V : °o I < d d C O O C •� •0 0 LL N A IL a a 0 0 O N N N -o p o Ipi v iv g ui ui N rn m LL C6 ill 0 0 ' p p I p� O o � 0 O 0 to o 0 I O m o O p O � O N V III °o I < �I I m 0 0 0 0 �I o 0 o m m N � � LL � III } O O 0 N N IL` A° LQ _ H �n vi �I I m n N 'c c h � O N � N N E 0N N N U O N y C U O � � p C U U C U N � C O O r EL`<a m ci' n a � L � � U v � c � $ c t0 m � a c y c c m m o E y m � c N � � N mcO c � c d O c � m � N U y � L T m tin O d O� A Y � � N C m C C Y:+ a` o v in p ai i� U a� U C N c n U C m O'O v i � {y rn o � a N N 3 t,01, c Z 0 N m c 0 0 c d c m d U C l0 C d V d 6 F Z d O d N C O .m 4=. 'O O 2 cO U LL CL Z U) U C N C d d � � y d O m) C c W ' N G d d C . � d U F ii d A d D n L'. C N � C iii � h 6 V! N v N d O U Cl) Q V 3 d s a G t J O } I o ;LL III O o j I m CL cu C y O � C j0 � N C LL I Q r A d a C �.. y y v d a H U o o li d Ol y d O'O N R G L V O S d O U °o� ,, o� d O U tq 0 vi fj c d 0 a LL d Oi N O ` N L O d i s o,o Za°i n Y g IFS I I r N r > p LL c oa Im _ d N O C CD d a t H v w j O a N IL a a = g M N 3 f e E+ m 3 c S 0 N y O O C � o � C m Co � C_ N • Y D 41 d C N v a N m c I d OI y N C V O O o d •o D N O o O V a °o N y w cu LL w U 0 d N E � .> a E 2 -c° c cu d y o d t c d Ll.l p d y Q C d C O O O p J C N C N d C CI N T E O v m y w NF"itFcc m >w c LL N o o o Er X o w r U C O Tr d j p D d 0 d O' V pp C C O CJ d C w OC d d N C p N C a5 o T c H J d c .m O w •C d d vE a rn m >, l0 c U N rr '� H Gf •Q o d y a° a d d d lL V d .. o ao o m ` d a Z� 3 a' Q IE U w J m 3 c S N � O � •— ca =� _� .� C V � Qt d � G1 � _ N O M N 3 Cn c t I-- I Sj0 � � N O O N O O t9 M O I O I O;O O 10 FJ [h LL t9 f9 01 C O] p O O C O O N > o vlv 0 I � o Q o f G r C H° N iA is 2 d v G pp N u> d rn y d y O °m m Iii d O V r i� G V N 0 L O� O o � � m O O C en e» y 3 c L y Lo L (ONO G N d 3 H O d'n O d p m oa y d O O O C C C O O 0— p d 0 c Q Q CD - � C�. = N U N G O O O w y m 4D 01 c � E F IM m O d 0 "c H e {p d •C R °' a W d ' C C L d aq+� y U �O p .� O L2 S r d d m a w H ._ M N 3 Cn c t A N C O j O' Q N (!J O. H t5 4) .O d N (O N U N O d V w E N w C O O' U Q � LL _ � U X U) N O N LL O I LL O O yN LL m OI LL co LLt0 °o °o 0 0 to i MO ON d r L- 0 0 +� d d N C C 10 C L. IL a` a N O N LL O I LL O O yN LL m OI LL co LLt0 °o °o 0 0 to i MO ON c a o r L- 0 0 w 0 C 0 T C I O y a U 7 � U I T o gl °0 0 r O O S O O i H O Imo', a to ' fA I T, C c a o QOo L- w 0 C 0 T I O y U 7 � U h C L a m a D m yC 0 A � C N y m m d G a` o 0 y O V � _ S c c 71 c a o � L- N Q E m E V N O y U 7 � U h C a a y a m i I C - m I Vl (n c � N L J N O d a L 4J a G zR $ c c m o m O � 3 F- Ill I S c c 71 M w N U) cu C t0 d 2 d F C1 0/ O d po N O CID O v� N 0 g r o m N �"J O O O O Omi N N {YL Vi _ _ g Of O O � LL O � �O 0 o > m 0 0 A O O {p N O O O O O � f)1 O. O A � [h 0 s m O 0 g O T M o m � i �i o m i ea 0 O O 0 0 t 3 U , C N N O d V O U n � U C •F o y m n = N n L a U 'a c a — d c m aEi a o � N C c d N � -do g > O 05 n d U N U N Ol C O O d A w A m O D m m y c d 2 N A O O 0 A LL = 2 � C d U c d y c � N n � N O ZiI D c w H C3 C . p� O d 4) W o f z o .o A IL 0 a o. a 0 s m O 0 g O T M o m � i �i o m i ea 0 O O 0 0 t 3 U , C N N O d V O U n � U C •F o y m n = N n L a U 'a c a — d c m aEi a o � N C c d N � -do g > O 05 n d U N U N Ol C O O O V y m 3 5 o, C t e d A d A w r D m m y c d A O O 0 A 9 2 � U c y C V O V y m 3 5 o, C t e M N 0 is N N N O N Cr cli N aG N M m I m I c _ o f6 N '$ D C N r m rn I N C y �_.— A 0 0 {=,f 4f N o o D G 0 N C OL NM O CL V N N m O I t0 00 00 'O Vdl i O O III O N I I ii LL �p O c � o a U o m -a N A [O [O I N U I (n of m j p C m a o � c ci Q p rn a rn S' CD d . C U E L d N (n w A 0 o A� 'av��O�°- O �u-� y a- CL CL _ aL� . G C! r N m 3 f C e - - - - - -- --III - - -- IIIIr N I ;I- N LL 0 i N ) � 0 V N I Iq A d w• m O a A y y I l0 A G 9 Q y rL 55 > N N N U O N I U y LL uj o. y N G I E g d Q. LL N L O'p O IS U) @ N C N E O O O L« N V LU U ID I d V i U j CU y LL _NN = U N N 2 U) O H d � O � L 0 fn a d d a t d 7 a r N m 3 f C e 3 c O1 J O.o. N O O O O O T 0 o O O I O O C O p p � N I N o O q r � o i dO o� o S O n CL y H v w ctl y I O O III � d O y O i o � o l r 0 0 c; Nro Or ai p . ILL m O U C ti N N m m a t0 c a a vi O Lo veil �t (6 N N O a 0 c 'C 0 N G m Z` 3 'L4 III 0 CL 0 D- d d c c m p 0; d O N CD A a_ U. a a 1°J ii O I-i d a23__ 3 c O1 J L6 m c OI e N � so O O d O O O O Vi Vi LL �- OI C 0 I O O O C Q iN LLr oO m Vi O t9 N t0 O 0 O o O j0 C y q 0 � O S y N D }O N C CO O ° O d ` tll y •o IL O U m p n` �4 CIS � 0 0 N 0 [°p tOp O O o' � a `o h C O m rn U � O a� Q' a m N � O o m O � O C U y CL a _ ri c .. IV m d 0 41 c O c E t :°• N E CL L6 m c OI e _O O r CD H •a+ C d E CL 0 W V cn �L N D N A 3 c a e CO N N ON) �4 IQ O ID N M � m LL O O T m F» w OI c O O o L p O O m 16 I (6 M� ON C O 6i 75 W N v N y c N w q CL ~ lao 0 o I w u rn w d G i I $ m m a o S V 0 w a p IL C� o i r g N N N T O G U O O O N 0 O O Iq n d W ° NI E 3 w `3 � s� o aE L H y Y 0 o � m �I I I d U C3 L UE G m 2 .. 1- Cf I CD A aci� ism R fn a` a a - m J A 3 c a e v N d G C si o!o CD ID O 'IO (q O O I 07 O C ° U o o S O C .� - »,by w � m .d.. ui N N'N q d I d CL YYry -. d N O N v N v N G. D O U W o I IL O O N N Cl! rI m �I I a m U N r zo'� y lV L 2 � N d 2 0 � v d ° t`o d c O T G U ui � U S d O ti o C) e d O O A a v v N d G C N N C5 C N N S O � OO O N vOi O N c � S S F r r T vi Vi O) S'S s o 0 I N LL in «n c ° J m o o O o f6 U A p d W N O O q l0 c A 3 O a7S G. d O O S d O U n r o 0 . y y n p D O N N C U TM T c W I SAS %L� d 3 O H N o a O sv c > t w ° p y o0 N O d L U l I- F C Vr L N G Toi F O) rn� ° d d C (L m o b H= m 3 c Oi J N �U LL f6 �U C Q (6 C N n a W G/ T N AD O d N LL N } LL O N LL 0 Y LL r ' °o N LL O a` N' H C (D IN IN m ' rn 11 � II C o Ili 0 to N o I N fA r _Q Q c T 0 w W I ri m e» o 0 r N M U � c i N_ (u M III d F- � W v 0 4) d O W O N GO rn d CD C A �N O o O 01 m M Lq T9 i m N N w IN IN m ' rn 11 � II c o Ili 0 to N o I N fA 4 N ' M c T 0 w m gi e» I ri m e» o 0 r N M 0 V I r LL� C17I O c rn e m N O � o Iw v m N O r Io I fA M III a A E m m c m rn y v g N L d U N C G -O A A j d 'r O �O H C E N d � 5 SO U n b N d a c b c 4 E D) C 0 d .. � II c o.O) y Y 4 p c T 0 w c 2 o O � c A O c L O R U d F- O LL r F a A E m m c m rn y v g N L d U N C G -O A A j d 'r O �O H C E N d � 5 SO U n b N d a c b c 4 E D) C 0 d .. D +d° y Y 4 A A y p d m ° o O A y V d F+ y 2 C v c v 0 d O W O O V I N 3 c t QI N CD U @ LL U C Q C @ C d E n Q W d CL H d O a` N d a @ r 0 a a c d E a o O W w d N C rn z c CD 4D a LL a a a g 0 0 N Q � w pT� o d U H � N C O c d E n v a� a c m m E m =o 0 n v g 0 d N o G O G ry 0 0 Oi 0, U G O v 3 s c t J "v N I c N o O jS' O O LL O O N p LL Y e» ss LL m � (O c U o0 c Q o 0 00 o c O LQ in ui A m C C m o o ' U ?� 0 r 0 0 a m o 00 0 In a C II ` LL CI nL I U I 0 0, O O ia` O y m U I I I N � O O C d — � y d o p N m p W t6 N a ate_ e� ra G V cu •` •0 Cc5 o m o O •O aUF LLo�l cg ?� IL a a `.NR "v N I c v m r pl I N N r LL i i N N tr U N LL O N > i I l� J2 U C C � Q o 1 � � d ym C C I N p d -C u O M o H c r A W O N <N V 10 ypy G N c p CO CD CL fn A N u ) O U N LU -..... 0 0 N U d C ca T 'E C d d O N n E2 E t E U c-i r� an .n cu m _ C O N E ca � y N d O E 3 O C O R N w tx d y4g IL a- O E _ m r pl N N �U c6 LL L m U C Q a c m c a) E d Q W CD CL F N O d N (6 C O 0 d C U C R C u? C m Z L � Z Z Q1 C N C tm C C D W Li o O , M a a N Y LL 0 N LL 0 0 0 0 N < 0 Y LL O N LL LL O D_ °o 0 S S g 01 c N a d N c N y C C3 W O N C S A y A D C G U A li Y 0 h y v d � � w c o+ w v N c a !O c O W O pT S S pS O U pO O li Y 0 fA b3 N c a O c W pT O N d U � FO- E t ii U Y 0 r L N i GO d O C C y d N a � N a CD O O O ` T O H O N i CO d O U 9 T C O -9 d N 3 " o O C (j d � U pa- d 0.0 y 2 o o ; o Vl � N 'O C Q LLJ C G d O (roj VJ i n u� 4 v G Q w O O (roj VJ i n u� 4 v G 3' c t J s s N O O O N N N A A LL U N N rn N rn N LL C � O C Q G O O O O N T s » LL I c CD E w .. d s o A i U e d r O W O N N N Li A C LL C G Q G N 0 T N H V O eri d d d O � O U 0 0 o I T � � LL y L_ N O LL N N > O) N N V 0 y N O _ U � y y y I A A p t N c > m rn i d $i C N � C G N 1 r y N o 3 t d G 9 c O W I ao O O) o C w :w in G aC O >' ail N O U v y c L'E o E 0 o •O a o v ii O 1 CL 1 _m a L y 3' c t J N i0 N d � O C 6 � O N � � C � IO t0 O O L O n N n C mo a o aci � h =o y rn C A c0 p n O d O C 0- to Y N N $ � b d h L w m o d L � r y r UUI -5 0 .� n y =moo C A N N r U A d 0) O O d D � A W � O N GG H o y a v y y u ao c 2 v w rn y a` o 0 m C I R O al UI O )cc� 1� h 3 p Z Of e N N � N � N N � N N m m N N rn m LL F N Vi N Vf N Qip r r C C N I I J C5 LL o 1% N N! lL t» di N _. T ~ f0 M m N <D [O a 0 o 0 1I 0 O vri � i N N w m ° N N d N � ICI � m m 0 0 _ A 0 V 0 V 0 to eii y 7 I m N 0 o Ci (n W I m ! C Q d d O of y O c W N !R. 25 co a 0 0 1.—. a a a N i0 N d � O C 6 � O N � � C � IO t0 O O L O n N n C mo a o aci � h =o y rn C A c0 p n O d O C 0- to Y N N $ � b d h L w m o d L � r y r UUI -5 0 .� n y =moo C A N N r U A d 0) O O d D � A W � O N GG H o y a v y y u ao c 2 v w rn y a` o 0 m C I R O al UI O )cc� 1� h 3 p Z Of e h N m e OI J N � � N N N - 7• lA N � LL N� to N� N o o I — i LL c 11 > L LL S QC 0 m e» e> m C N co (A Vi Q o d r W A q G� y O. - -- I to M v d _O. .u" 2 � cri O O IL 0 0 LL i LLH w cH L M c m W N m O J 0 N L .E F N M N N to CD f7 d m I 2i rn c O 3 m _ m IZ d O O co W U U O F C1 o� T V d d C c E L +O'I. d o m _ a�° IL IL a`t_R m e OI J Lh 3 C N .0 LL G LL I I I (O �I C Q � N } I l C WN ca LL o A G O O C O C CL A o 00l N S L N CD r LL j OW OK a p O O N E 0 d a G O U d _ O'oO S N p ; v V O O t0 N LL N C N Q W Q N x W CD O Of D c w W m Q 0 �e o V V C,a C C �c m 2 d O d O C A C C U E L wl d O O C y ICU H ii Of yl IL IL H o -3 L Lh 3 C L6 m 3 d e a C N m m � N N lL t9 Vi � O O O � � NW OL IrL w OL � p R O N N O � N m C LL w FA f0 C N,N I A d m ° > N m ao rn m ry m m O a` c a y lL «n (A O � m m � `p 0jO 0 m p o o t o �i rn h I d U Cn C N N I � C r O C5 LL U3 c 1 C ii • d N G as ° �` �a I d U 'vr t a o d •C d d � � c° � E t III 41 h rn a a a m 3 d e a C m S G z Oi N m mI' O O I r LL t9 i H r N N j O m m N ? e{ O 0 � I o � O O O O) C Oi m m a�q m A d A cu C w OD 7 m W OI y o) W a • N CL V m m I m cV O O O ail � I'I t c m VIII', o N C N m CU C C (/J c c EL a Q P n e> o M ! o c LU w C c c V + 2 o yr '� V Cl 20 d O d •O C m C; O 1 "N �p a U r- LL O H OO h m S G z I £ \ \ \ § }\ CL k C4 2�if § CL k ;« k. \ -. \ ƒ /�� .� . -eu >� . o _/ kE3 {) -- ; \ ƒm a , k �� \/0 § ! a -0 . . ■ 2 \ � /§0 o / \ ) )I.�:2 \ kk ID CD � n L `° 7D 7 � �� �4! 2 �- - £ N N Mm e O o 0 LL w Mi I •- o o O O d Q I I D! 0 0' C t0 1}i I Cn .. m d iii D N y O Q- o ) a o v H p J 0 N g g C O ILL O O t N � NN fA f9 O ° C a` A Yo o f m a l N o E ° o u N 0 w a s O c N N � ii 'C C G y A C 0 o A LL L N N N Mm e N 0 d d U) N N C m m .0 m a C1 CL H V d �O d U) E o C) N c U � lL 2 p T � C) C C C N E L Y N O l- C m CL a C) cb N C C c d d C L- d G. d S S N o O O O O N N N r fA fA LL 8 O O O O O N N N LL 0o S. 0 0 0 o S S N N N LL o o O 0 0' N NIN S °o m o 0 LL 0 0 0 0 A O O O N N N N N !A fpA O o. a o p0 _ O O � � N H N � r c rn E o N c � lL Y p T � a N C C C U E L Y N O l- N O N N 0 m N O_ O d O N O) C C C d a 0 N d y l6 V C O Z D_ D7 c a O C O 7 m 3 a p L J A Y � a N C q � N O m v' L- C O 7 m 3 a p L J N 4] v c 01 J N .. O- to NN! ^� � LL O CL _ ) yp O °°,q C O . U) O O!O C LL � I I cm Li F- S Ig m w G. a U J ° oI LL � O O ! w N LL o m LL d I U a I O crc W o o N O N L� 5 N I� O 10 p U) � I y O I I. I O w e hq d Ui d O O d �+ � V o « d O � j D c a W N ° V 8 E ; O O a U � H eCO O m a a a a �8c L � � N 4] v c 01 J b e o� N °o O 1 O O to LL r O O r M O1 (n O C S w6 O O� C D1 _C C t6 Ql O O C N CL CL tao O V O O TO 0 111r 0 r o r a o � O N C (n O C O C d r .V C) .c O fQ LL Z N N d N{ c a 05 a O am o V c N Q Lu N y o d y w d a O 0 0 a v i OI H O y o m y IL a a - d -> d 0 b e o� v y L m L C L C. r�� u v C O 6J T U C d O) C C O U �t5 y C m m C N D_ d U N N CL I.- N �O CL u N O r LL 0 N LL O O N r LL O N LL m y0 LL °o N r LL r LL O a` A 0 H Ci c=3 ci Lol (A IVi a.n A c U) A q N C 'O C U m C d o_ Q y E O v Q q'S N T W C U C f9 d. N O :2 Z S O 00 U CD +_ .. N C F CF) C .0 N d IL d d N O r LL 0 N LL O O N r LL O N LL m y0 LL °o N r LL r LL O a` A 0 H Ci c=3 ci Lol (A IVi O ryd U E t m `o c d d t_ C U U O a A c 0 C6 rn a O d o N N d m m N C C O O) C Q d 0 a.n A c � C d O A q N C 'O E U m C d G U o_ Q y O v Q q'S C o T W C C O ryd U E t m `o c d d t_ C U U O a A c 0 C6 rn a O d o N N d m m N C C O O) C Q d 0 a.n A y� W N N Li C3 � C d O A q N C 'O O R U a C d G U to Q O v v m ry 3 a c t 0 N >. U C N O) C C O U w N N Q1 C N Q N V Z d N a d Q H V d O a` 0 N O N LL I o ' 0 0 N LL A O N H 0 o N N_ 69 fA S o ' oo N N I y� I ya o to NN �t � r ' NIN t9 to I 0 0 t9 I, M I g o L C o O N N_ N_ 3 O c LL tO O a Q c W M � f6 t O a U U u_ O lF O O U m m a- L (n U U d CD C N C N •0 •Q C � LL IL Q a 0 N O N LL I o ' 0 0 N LL A O N H 0 o N N_ 69 fA S o ' oo N N I y� I ya o to NN �t � r ' NIN t9 to I 0 0 t9 I, M I g o N C o O N N_ N_ LL c w U O a LLi c W M � o t O a 0 N O N LL I o ' 0 0 N LL A O N H 0 o N N_ 69 fA S o ' oo N N I y� I ya o to NN �t � r ' NIN t9 to I 0 0 t9 I, M I N N C m t9 fA ' a w a t > U V O d L � a p O O✓ T C - N � r Q Q m c U $ U m � C a w V t a t- (� c Vl N_ L_ O 3 y N fA a G .a.. N N C A y p N a m A O O d G U y C I O Cts C IS- I O I V GI O w 7 I c t J C a C d� I c w U O a c W O c a o t O a U � u_ O lF a w a t > U V O d L � a p O O✓ T C - N � r Q Q m c U $ U m � C a w V t a t- (� c Vl N_ L_ O 3 y N fA a G .a.. N N C A y p N a m A O O d G U y C I O Cts C IS- I O I V GI O w 7 I c t J m 3 C O� e 1111 Q N C O 06 106 C O N r rn rn U LL c w o 0 tq u> m N O o C c O S us N V < N o o o I y C C i f Li li ,C c O G C j '.. A ,may .°_ .o O >, 2 g is I. _ c rn V O m O 0 C L G U ul I V : M m O N N T II d E H O � Q i A � d �N ti d d N T U A o d O C U A O O A p U U N G o o w d o C T d a�i c 7 T C A E GOi a a a a � U a m 3 C O� e N O N � U C d C C O U N C C N a O d U Z d m d d a G CD .O d I N C (6 F O U) F O w U 0 o °o r o'o o °o loo N YJ IfJ ev e» d J"�� O p r C •_ d d d C C o °o r o'o o °o loo N YJ IfJ ev e» g o J"�� O p r p uJ u'i LL w I� o °o r o'o o °o loo N YJ IfJ ev e» O N o O ILL i � N t9 V3 o D Iap o Q0Q N °o S 0 o o °o N p i 00 I Y p�O O i o LLO O CL N N to v� I _ O o O O AI 0 H a.v m m I d C nOl I � W 0 p T od 0 o c C C Lj E� I q q d U F- ii O I F-, OI c 0 m O d A d v Y O q C Li q N O U I d I N p O O O N I y N « O N me U E m C C N d N L L 0 d C C L N O G d C q Of N � J t O O U J O N w O L N I N q C D_ O C U N d N w U O n W n'13 H y w2 0°0 .7 CL m i S Z c OI J A O O p r p O N o O ILL i � N t9 V3 o D Iap o Q0Q N °o S 0 o o °o N p i 00 I Y p�O O i o LLO O CL N N to v� I _ O o O O AI 0 H a.v m m I d C nOl I � W 0 p T od 0 o c C C Lj E� I q q d U F- ii O I F-, OI c 0 m O d A d v Y O q C Li q N O U I d I N p O O O N I y N « O N me U E m C C N d N L L 0 d C C L N O G d C q Of N � J t O O U J O N w O L N I N q C D_ O C U N d N w U O n W n'13 H y w2 0°0 .7 CL m i S Z c OI J A O O p p o D Iap o Q0Q N °o S 0 o o °o N p i 00 I Y p�O O i o LLO O CL N N to v� I _ O o O O AI 0 H a.v m m I d C nOl I � W 0 p T od 0 o c C C Lj E� I q q d U F- ii O I F-, OI c 0 m O d A d v Y O q C Li q N O U I d I N p O O O N I y N « O N me U E m C C N d N L L 0 d C C L N O G d C q Of N � J t O O U J O N w O L N I N q C D_ O C U N d N w U O n W n'13 H y w2 0°0 .7 CL m i S Z c OI J d C nOl I � W 0 p T od 0 o c C C Lj E� I q q d U F- ii O I F-, OI c 0 m O d A d v Y O q C Li q N O U I d I N p O O O N I y N « O N me U E m C C N d N L L 0 d C C L N O G d C q Of N � J t O O U J O N w O L N I N q C D_ O C U N d N w U O n W n'13 H y w2 0°0 .7 CL m i S Z c OI J OI c 0 m O d A d v Y O q C Li q N O U I d I N p O O O N I y N « O N me U E m C C N d N L L 0 d C C L N O G d C q Of N � J t O O U J O N w O L N I N q C D_ O C U N d N w U O n W n'13 H y w2 0°0 .7 CL m i S Z c OI J i S Z c OI J M N N 3 e Q+ 0 m N m 5 O N m m U IrL sNV sNv ID M � M N m h m m N m m i sN9 KN� � C m ao M CO M m C O O o N m m m � en eA q O C 0 CD A CL cq 61 N m m d D V N p d I i m m, o° F m m d ° o'o m FL- O U tO d W m! L N L C .- p O N I y G c t O ° � m ° N O C y fn p r C U I•� N � N � L CD H m - Z C N O CI 0 c w c° od C a c O 'w q cn t � V N I U) N c � m c° ° E L .. CD A? � O O A IQ- U CL d d t7 as U N 7 M N N 3 e Q+ a U - N S � N O g N C C I m IO' O LL U I d o o' p A pp LL N p d C ry R O O d O d O p U ) w p. a �o f, g N O O i O to it to (pd N 0 d C L a 0 o N _ f6 O O III C p_ 'O `m 0- ~ C5 O N ca 0 N E L G T N U C Y T O -J ! m c N N O a o a U) C ayi c y G m y a F O 01 V 41 C C C C N t :g a V d O> N I► C O 0 �a v �� _ 0 C d _m d ii o O x o. o J y r a L 3 L 0 -- - -� 3 c a J C O O a N Lei N C O U 06 � S S N o o � L N N N C O m O O C d O O O O I O S S CD w c N LL g,S 'yJ O C O. I G � C7 0 ° S d O v 0 U 0) p .O LL w A Ci IL I , LU N c0 <O T m m LL FA ItA O � d S S N a C y 9 T1 N U _Z � cQ G Ste' d d C ayi Q ' H w Ti G H O) G a a a a tm t- E N m N 3 e J pq C d. �O L � V V f+ pq N TOM O N c0 O O N LL - _ N N LL O N W I O N C O O O p O p O p p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 } o 00 00 p0 LL C) O O p p O p O 0 C 0 0000000 0000 0 cc oom 0 N N N O O O O N O O O O N O O O p N N N N LL O +� N .5 ca L O } p LL O N •C.) c L co O O O O O O p N p p IL` LL T w co d E N O O m z N t'1 d N N � d N N ii o o L U M O O d M T N a�i m c CL c m O U p O d p m N O 0 h O O h 0 °o a °O r p O p p p p O p O O O p O p O p p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 p0 O p p O p p O p O O p p O p O 0 0 0 0 0000000 0000 0 000 oom 0 N N N O O O O N O O O O N O O O p N N N N W O O O O O O O O p p p p p 0 o c o 0 6 6 O O N O N O O N t'1 d N N d N N M O O O O O O O O p O d N d N M p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N p N N N O O p O O O O p O O O O p O N O N N r N cNj N N N d 4 N m N N N W (n N y w z W N W L W N N N a z c .0 N w W N y N c y N to 2 N 4 m Y Y w y m w 3 m o d d N u , m LT 3 "(5 m m m N x LL c g =p y N Y E y y p T C O. N T 41 N E c Y N E T p m= c C a0Q E: (9 m 0 m za a�a vwi'o w E m Oa �Ewz Q ti dW � 2 Q O ii n 3 e t ,o d m76 U N ~ } 0 LL O N LL O N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 LL N V O O O O o O O O O O O O O O /C `V O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O m o 0 oo� N 000 00 0 •cc o00o 00 ro O Ol LO N O O O O c r O LL O N y O O O p N m N .L CL LL c7 .- m E M c m o Z 0 0 O u o O O t U) N T ~ O F- y U N m O i CL O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O oo� 0 000 00 0 om�� o00o 00 N O Ol O O O O O r O O N O .- N m N m N d c7 .- d tp N M M M N m 1� M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O p O O O O O O O O N O N N m n0'l (OBI tN'J o a o o a a o 0 o m o 0 N d r ch M 0 N 3 o°0 00 °O o 00 0 0 O O N O y p N C O� J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O Of O O O N M N N d N (h O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 N 0 N X00 N 0 0 N I� O U W d i 0 0 U d to Z m U °-' . m N d o C E m > U 0 Y W U U' J U �I m E J V J o a 0 0 U � N U N y c v E m m m m g y N m J C L C 0 U C C N N N N m M 0 0 3 M N N Y p, Y> t m ' m c 0 m mw F- � "xza' >ac70o'a 0z LL W V AC W .5 L 0 �0 o >0 o � N N O N 0 y o 0 LL O o N O N O LL O N i O LL O N } O0 LL O N W o O o O N N IL LL m E c m a z o LL o m N 3 d G L C CL CL H w N m c `0 7 O a? m m m 'v m¢ CL E c 'm W 0 m N 3 d G L C 0 �0 } F LL p N a O O 0 LL O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° o S o LL o N V C 0 m 0 A' m LLm W O t� N ate, 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O } O f0 O LL O N N O O O N Ip N m N Q LL 0 O N CL } rn N E N N c o � Z M 0 o U co N T H F- m N C C d m 0 y O a c S 0 a O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° o S o 0 0 0 O m S O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O f0 O 1� N O O O N Ip N m N O 1� O N N N •- M N O O 0 O S Np 0 N S O O N N D N N S S S 00 0 aD 0 n 0 N S °O S S 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 m $ °0 °o 00 °o o° 0 0 0 0 0 �4 S O O N O N O G M Z e o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 C5 0 S O 0 S S S O O O O 0 N G O G O O H 0 M of Ul N O N N O i0 r M O O T C d 0 r4 ayi Q •= a v m LL ° O U � N_ A ° U C � L d o° A f o N c C0 N y E E w W N w w v v y m E d O U, m ° = m 1p O c U N LL N N `Ow C U W C K C Y H LL er C N U y YW > ov J U W N N N U 4r N N O S m m T N i` F 9 m c U -di V (I a 3 Z U J IL c cu a W V C ca .5 L �U cc LL co o 0 00 0 o a } � N o O N O N N R] h N � N � N LL O O o LL O N o o � LL O m } � o 0 LL O o N o N N N LL O w N > o o � LL O N t 3' e t z O 0 o0 LL O p N N w 2 o � 0 0 U C O N m LL � d t0 N c m O E C N 0 Z O Q d 0-1 O t 3' e t z W F w 2 C U C w c m d t0 c m L C C rn Q d Q 0 t 3' e t z 0 L6 U 0 N cc CL W o 0 N W O N •5 L } 0O W O N �U o cO LL o N O N o a` LL c C N N O m Z (n O 0 U CL N m T F� H y C C O d CL E m 0 0 0 o O 0 N O O $$o $8 o a N o of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O n r m o O o N N 0 0 0 goo�o0Soo 0000 S 0 0 tD 00 (C t0 W O (O O R] m N N ° N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m G O O N N N N a S O a 0 0 N 0 of a s N N N N y x1: mE m urN m m C7 cm = 2 0 i• rn o" rn m `o m w Z v Qs 3f '6 ! Z� c c d U-6 2 `m' v o ¢ 0 " m a tt 2 W y t N N D L E C L Y m t D E 2a 0 w 00 E g Z Oa � m CD 0 E�2an�a �'E =a Em�tm 30 _ _ m O a o a a e� 3' fi C t J O O o 0 0 0 0 0 in $ in In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N~ N N N N N N N o O o O o 0 0 0 O °O O N N N p0 O O O �= O c0 vl t0 lV lV fV O O aD U 0 N cc CL W o 0 N W O N •5 L } 0O W O N �U o cO LL o N O N o a` LL c C N N O m Z (n O 0 U CL N m T F� H y C C O d CL E m 0 0 0 o O 0 N O O $$o $8 o a N o of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O n r m o O o N N 0 0 0 goo�o0Soo 0000 S 0 0 tD 00 (C t0 W O (O O R] m N N ° N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m G O O N N N N a S O a 0 0 N 0 of a s N N N N y x1: mE m urN m m C7 cm = 2 0 i• rn o" rn m `o m w Z v Qs 3f '6 ! Z� c c d U-6 2 `m' v o ¢ 0 " m a tt 2 W y t N N D L E C L Y m t D E 2a 0 w 00 E g Z Oa � m CD 0 E�2an�a �'E =a Em�tm 30 _ _ m O a o a a e� 3' fi C t J } ..� N ~ O } � LL O N LL O N C O O o ca o O o 0 a}� 0 LL N 0 0 0 0 00 ca 0 0 o O o L' 0 7 m 0 n 00 0 0 0 0 m co ti g LL o N o g O o .5 0 0 0 N L N u2 } O0 iQi LL O N .C.) 0 cc L O N m O 0 O ' d LL O C N O O m O O O O o O O O o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 o O o 0 o 0 7 0 0 o 0 n 00 0 0 0 0 m co ti g O O D 0 0 4 o g O o 0 0 0 0 N N u2 iQi 0 N ti �- N O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 m N O N N O O O CD O O O O O O 0 q ° 0 o r o o Lo h IO N IfJ tD O 0 o N O N 0 v o o v v O N N N N 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 N m N O O O O o v 0 0 N N O 0 N O Z _ L O _ O (n O c CL � � N m w N Y W d W W W N W N N= ;� in O U N W m O fn F- to m 3 '� w Y m m m 3 d m .o a y O v m C7 O o lL v o W ° ~ m =% LL N /0 C O V w V L N= C E Or T Y Z y O V �` H a O C> rn m o 0 a, m m° 'o o ° m O -Y' Y> o m d d m aci m 0 C G m 0 0 0= z a F "> > a 0 w C9 m C7 � 2 �' w C7 O E .� W i 2 Z a` lil ¢ c W 0 a 3' m a c r` e a a LL LL LL _cc /�—� 'V/ LL V cc LL LL •5 LL c C N C C 'C O Q .6 C- NQi LL Q O U U) CL c N c O CL E U 0 0 0 °O 0pp 0 0IA 0N 0 0 s 0 0S 00 < N 00 O N N G C O O O 01 O fG m N d n r O O O S O S O O O N N d S � O N A O N O O cV e� 3 8 � c IV t OI s S O O O O O O S S O O O Op O O O O O O O O O O O O p h N O M M cN'J N N H m N O O O O O O O S S S O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N N T O O O Vl 0 0 0 (O N lA OO N OQ N O S m fn U h c w m '° LL G a E E m m aO i m o � > o'm Q <c7a� �E m cl z a m f-a 2O C V T w E ¢ m a 'w V LL �0 } N N L O N >. I O N C cc a,0 O O O 0 0 0 CD O o N U O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O In O O N O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) LL °O QD O O 47 tD IO N ,}� .5 N O N m O r N^ cc O O !^ 0 00 n N N m' N N ! L O N �U U- o � wo N G o O a` 0 0 c o O O m N� LL Ul 0 O O L m Z O O O O O ° 0 0 O N m N M N O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O In O O N O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O t0 N 1� O O 47 tD IO 0 O O N O N m O r N^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O !^ 0 00 n N N m' N N ! .6 w O N O Om N O O! N 0 0 o O O m O O o co 0 o O O N N � L(] cV N N N � � O O O O O ° 0 0 O N m N M N s s o o S N S o 0 O O O O N O 00 O N O O O V N N O O O r ^ N N M N O U U) O z 0 L (n U U N w w m r a >. w d w ~ w N a m W E E (7 Fo- o m m w w i U o c m `m c c c `m O N a m c O o¢ (7 a C C w m d 5_ y y ry a 1- w w g c m m a m d N s .mod, Z m N Z a o t Y s c n m y c m O a E m m s Z v o m t m p m C C m o m O U' 0 0 rn m m m v t0 m w y c'o m m c o° c o m o o E m t Y m (7 O. O= .� z O a a a �n vi N �- >> U w 0 0 E i z O a t O _ 0 0 O 0 O 0 00 0 O m O O o co 0 N N C1 °0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o ion N N N Lo L6 N m N O N yj ts N N a c t 00 O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N O N O O] O !- O O Lo O 1 Lo V N � N s s o o S N S o 0 O O O O N O 00 O N O O O V N N O O O r ^ N N M N O U U) O z 0 L (n U U N w w m r a >. w d w ~ w N a m W E E (7 Fo- o m m w w i U o c m `m c c c `m O N a m c O o¢ (7 a C C w m d 5_ y y ry a 1- w w g c m m a m d N s .mod, Z m N Z a o t Y s c n m y c m O a E m m s Z v o m t m p m C C m o m O U' 0 0 rn m m m v t0 m w y c'o m m c o° c o m o o E m t Y m (7 O. O= .� z O a a a �n vi N �- >> U w 0 0 E i z O a t O _ 0 a N f0 1(J 04 LL LL O N LL O N C 0 0 cc O O O S O O O O O O O O LL O N V O M S YOl r N r O C O LL m a O M N CO'J N rp } O ` /1 0 LL O N of S O LL N O N O o a` LL S O O O N C U1 O O N O Z L U a (n O U 0 N a CL ~ I- N C C ci Q co O N a 0 O O S O O O i0(] S S S S OO A A G u Ci N h N r N A M O t'1 th — O r O O Vi Lo SS m 0 cn .n 0 0 0 0 O O O S O O O O O O O O O o O M S YOl r N r O r a M N CO'J N uJ N 0 of S O S O O S O O O N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o M m 00 O O 0 0 d m m m m U ° = ° hw °& >Emm9 y N O1 y z y o 0 o ° U .0 'o - UL p a E ° v m m c7 EJzm TS 2 M 7 3,� w O S S 0 0 O O O O S O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O M S YOl N N r O M N CO'J N uJ N N S O S O O O O O a o° ci 0 o a N O ri 0 0 0 00 S � o m vi e n 0 0 3 S o °o o m C � r a e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r m 4° O M N N V O O O O O O O 0 0 O S 0 0 O O O N O O O ap N V N N N ui w N vi = m m m m ✓+ m m m mp 3 N Z+ a W T N N a F' U N 7. z C N Y S W LL T] m U 2 J J M > 1 W C] U' E J z U O J W � 2 C /_c LL W U C N cc C •5 2 V/ ca LL 0 % O N � � M m m } N o LL O N N a N 0 U- 0 °v N t� of LL O n N � m Y o n LL O v N N (O O LL O v N N N O W O O O C O N N O d o M f0 O C N O m O L Z U (n O L U N p, CL T H ~ N O C C ~ N c0 c C C n 0 c E U 3' sue.. G t C ti Tom Co N M r O N LL r. ^_cc ( L U m •5 Q co LL N 0 lf] ~ LL O N LL - O N LL O N v LL N fh LL O N 0 � 0 (VO a`LL L" � O m E Ln N z LL o 0 r o U) m m w N a m U w w N W w P m y = W f/1 fn W L W E fn N to CL F �U >� � N y W N W y� W N� Ln N N c 'E ~_ U M v a i 9 N y m O N c C U U O ^ N d U C= LL L- O In d y C d N d N U G m r Ol 9 ii O N t0 c �p y N s` E m c U y v t v v W v v `u (7 a E >. y Z v p v d o U i m o p a E m n- m m E v "n 'E E c s` v CL a? y '� p a 0 y w T m U C9 = w w w z a a w w F j a 0 w 0 E LE O a� m 0 c = LU m � O �I O LLi U m 0 0 � p p OO C o 0 0 0 o O O 00 °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N p p 00 O O O O O O O O O � Yl O a M Ip O O m p 0p 00 p 0 o 0 0 0 co 0 o p o o O o v o 0 0 3 o v ai G i O O 0 O O O p O r N 0 0 O CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N O O O m lA N N O N O O O O l0 O 10 10 N O O N V N N N N N M M th a N N nJ M IO V y) V L" � O m E Ln N z LL o 0 r o U) m m w N a m U w w N W w P m y = W f/1 fn W L W E fn N to CL F �U >� � N y W N W y� W N� Ln N N c 'E ~_ U M v a i 9 N y m O N c C U U O ^ N d U C= LL L- O In d y C d N d N U G m r Ol 9 ii O N t0 c �p y N s` E m c U y v t v v W v v `u (7 a E >. y Z v p v d o U i m o p a E m n- m m E v "n 'E E c s` v CL a? y '� p a 0 y w T m U C9 = w w w z a a w w F j a 0 w 0 E LE O a� m 0 c = LU m � O �I O LLi U v $a m0 o0 % � O N Y0 N N Y (D o LL O O o N N C cc a ,Lf) LL N V C cc C � L o }� N C .5 ca L } M o LL O C N cc O M o0 00 00 O N C r r N N a LL d d ? m E r m m z = d _ � L = � f � d T = O F- 2 U m r N C c m E�z3.��� C E m U e LL 3 e t a a= N } LL 0 O N } LL p N C O o 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O 00 0 LL N U C O O N C r N � 0 0 0 LL O N �5 rn o 0 cu O LL O N 0 �U m 0m_ LL O N a} LL O c E � 0 Z LL o O L U O a N a r I- U a�i m y C C d C O_ C C C O U 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O 00 0 O O N r N 00 0 0 0 °o 0 rn o 0 00 O 0 w N O O r N L 0 x 0 N 0 c m o 00 O O O y y 0 O U O M O N H i N t7 °0 0 00 o c0 0 N N � O o O o 0 0 0 0 O O O O 00 0 O O N r N O 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O N O o O O 00 0 0 N N 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 n 0 3 o y O y M G t r o a 0 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 °o rn o 0 00 L x 0 0 0 c m o ? N y y N U U H i LL 3 o "E d a y w E E �10j o = m m E C, h d v O fn 0 A Uo U O U LL O a U ^T EP N U m w C m a W Z N Z C o y fn o= O ry Y c U 7 Y 0 Y q Y t _ U U W E m U U W 0 (D (J J J 2a U W Z t m O m U E d J t >0 W> J J N F N O_I N N x Z 0 Q t o W a iT U m 2 Q r W 0 a �6 �O ~ }o LL O N L O N o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o }� ° LLo N C °o °o °m o m a N o C } 0 M N M N LL O N W N C O .5 cc O } LL O N S O \V O Cl) L N O N O N m (7 N N N ° E c m o z 0 0 0 0 o 00 0S r 0 U 0 U) 0 0 0 N 0 0 OL 0 N O N U O N C n c O CL c E A o g U o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o ° ° M °o °o °m o m a N o N M N M N t7 N W N O O O O a S O O O N N O m (7 N N N R1 o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N W = n L W W N N N L w N E w m m m i m y K N w m a m 3 d 0 O 3 m° o= o r w m U a m m E i in N vi H> v C7 C7 E i O a 0 z a ¢ w w g C 9 .� 3 t e N � M °O o 0 0 0 00 00 0S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N h r O N N n S m N N W = n L W W N N N L w N E w m m m i m y K N w m a m 3 d 0 O 3 m° o= o r w m U a m m E i in N vi H> v C7 C7 E i O a 0 z a ¢ w w g C 9 .� 3 t e L co a (D V cc Qi f� C �U cc U- m O N O } ~ m m N S m � O O LL N ry o ° o m } � LL O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 � m O O O O LL N O O ° � 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r �T a °o N a O m O O Co O m M O N O O LL O N m m t y 0 0 NN aLL T Ol N W U m ¢ z 2 00 L U 0 _ O C C N t6 O CL c 0 I N 0 0 O O W m o S ui m E m m 3 o ° o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O OJ r O a 7 J a O N O O O O O m m T M O C O O Co O ° o N h t y u? m a V m N � ° o0 0 0 N N m O m N 0 0 O O O N m o S ui m ° m m 3 o ° o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O OJ r O v) C O O o O N O O O O O m m T M O C O O Co O ° o N h t u? O O (gyp N N V m N m V N N r 00 O O O O O O O O O O 1 °O °O ° m o m fV O O o O (V O 0 m m m O A N N N N 13 c O 0 c O O O O O O O O O O O O O ° oo o m °o m y N V ° o0 0 0 N N m O m N y L ry U 0 LL 3 �0 w U � c � ¢ t 0 N N W x U m y ) C _ t0 N N C0 O O) LL N y N ry y 9 V- aCi m U c7 m° 0 0 0 0 0° °o °O °o °o °o °o °o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m N p1 N O N O O I6 r O (O O N m m (O � � N OQ U m y U w W w t� (O o W t y W d w w s m N N LD N m C ' d N d a F y C N N F Y `m a�i m LM o 0 0+ s s n y m C w ¢ m U C7 = z O a a a° m a` 'w 0 0 O O O N m o S ui m ° m m 3 o ° o V � m c t C O O O O O O 1 m m o O o m o N m m m y L ry U 0 LL 3 �0 w U � c � ¢ t 0 N N W x U m y ) C _ t0 N N C0 O O) LL N y N ry y 9 V- aCi m U c7 m° 0 0 0 0 0° °o °O °o °o °o °o °o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m N p1 N O N O O I6 r O (O O N m m (O � � N OQ U m y U w W w t� (O o W t y W d w w s m N N LD N m C ' d N d a F y C N N F Y `m a�i m LM o 0 0+ s s n y m C w ¢ m U C7 = z O a a a° m a` 'w 0 0 O O O N m o m ui m m m y L ry U 0 LL 3 �0 w U � c � ¢ t 0 N N W x U m y ) C _ t0 N N C0 O O) LL N y N ry y 9 V- aCi m U c7 m° 0 0 0 0 0° °o °O °o °o °o °o °o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m N p1 N O N O O I6 r O (O O N m m (O � � N OQ U m y U w W w t� (O o W t y W d w w s m N N LD N m C ' d N d a F y C N N F Y `m a�i m LM o 0 0+ s s n y m C w ¢ m U C7 = z O a a a° m a` 'w co i O ui LL o N LL O N C 0 m 0 0 a }� O LL CO N V O O C O N cc m ° M C � t}i o }� N v v M N I ° LL O N °o \V O M L O N O CL LL T O) N C N W E U m Q Z 2 °O L U N C C CL d C E m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O M O N y m ° M N .- v v M N ° ° °o o o cm $ o 0o S S o6 S o S c� or0 S N O O W � M IV IA I� 16 O IN to W N o O O v ci O 0 0 0 0 to N S S S S S S v m N m m m m x 0 0 0$ o 0 0 m L U N 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O °o o °o 0o S S o6 S S °o S c� O O W IV IA I� 16 O IN to W N o O O O M N m 0 m M M y 1� to N N x m x L U d y d W 0 w W Ny 2 i1 M N U N a N m 2 U v 2 A m a U m y �L c m � 5> c w c7 c7 E a �m cD E � z m 3 = Q r v 3 C O1 e >F } 0 LL O N } LL O N cu a � LLa N U C cu LL C) +� N C •5 f� } LL O, N c 0 r O N a> LL d E C � Z N� L Q U C a N U N N C C C CL C E Fu 0 U c d A i O °O N N U N m N � � U) m Z 4 3 E L a E W m Z m a U o 0 O O N O O O N O 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 N O 0 0 00 m M O O N (") M^ N N M r r r 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 °0 O p °o ° O p 0 0 0 0 o O N m r ° m r � O � m 0 O m N 3 0 c t O O N eN- 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 m o a N N O O O O O N O N N m r ^ N U c d A i O °O N N U N m N � � U) m Z 4 3 E L a E W m Z m a U o 0 O O N O O O N O 0 C° O 0 0 0 O O O N O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N O p ° O p ° 0 o ° � N � m 0 m 3 c t O O eN- N N O O O O O r o O O O N N O D7 v d d d O s N L y N O N v v E n w w 2 h E n E t0 rn�= Z c c ry N a E LL C C O O r DI N~ N N E E� c c c c w' U O a h w w w N W N o _E 'w 0 N LL LL 0 0 LL 0 0 m 0 0 a , S LL S S S `V o O i LL LL C G cc •5 L LL O N LL �Q S N m m LL C Z C tN0 N lop N c00 a` Ol C w O OOI O N 1a r 0 C N C O CL E O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S S S S S S S S o O i o G N N O N S 8 p S S N m N tN0 N lop N c00 N OOI N O 0 O O S 41 N O S 1� O N O O N _m N O 00 O N F N W N m w o ,v_ S2 m§ O E n m �j m U N 0 U' $ rn r a z o > Ya cS - 7 E c U o v c7 y � m0 cD € i O a a w w > > LL m M .1. 3 V c L J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O o O i o G N N O N S 8 p S S N m N tN0 N lop N c00 N OOI N 0 41 N O O O O _m O O N O N O r r 00 O N F N W N m w o ,v_ S2 m§ O E n m �j m U N 0 U' $ rn r a z o > Ya cS - 7 E c U o v c7 y � m0 cD € i O a a w w > > LL m M .1. 3 V c L J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O i 0 N S 8 p S S N m m tN0 N lop N c00 N OOI N 41 t _m I r 00 O N F N W N m w o ,v_ S2 m§ O E n m �j m U N 0 U' $ rn r a z o > Ya cS - 7 E c U o v c7 y � m0 cD € i O a a w w > > LL m M .1. 3 V c L J �6 } tCI N LL C N ". C O O O°°° cc a 0 0 0 0 o ,U) (D 0 LL N N V 0 ° p O O N N O O O c 0 O O 0 p O N p0 ] O W N W LL O }0 N C O cu �5 6 } CY) LL O N c _ 0 Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N ._ O d LL co 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O N C O r d' N a E p p p p p p O O O O°°° O° 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° p O O N N O O O c 0 O O 0 p O N p0 ] O W N ) N O O O O N m N O N _ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O N r O O O O O ° m N O O O N O U O. O p O ' r O N 0 00 0 on o0 0 C O p O U Z O d O Z a N of (O O N (O O O N p N c m N N O r N < a ,Z O m tc c o N U p S m d c C _N x c y _ m m m u m Z _m s a C Oa c 0 0 0 0 o m o U W O 0 E m f a m c z O a N E aTi m E m ' 0 m O o M° m -�` y= E 4 c O 0 O O O o m ao o D �p m m c7 C7 Z d O a d N C7 (7 S z a° a Co) W O9 E O E t6 W M O O O O O C W O O N O O p O p O O N N O O O O O N O O O 1Ij N m N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o 00 °0 °p °0 O O O O O O N O N N O O O O O r O 0 O OJ N N N O lD (D N (p N N r t0 O N a O 6 O O O O O O O C5 N O n N O o m Z L O _ 0 O N N U O. 0 C U Z O d O Z a c O y N 0 p N c m m 3 m rn N C_ f0 C L a ,Z O m tc c o N U p S m d c C _N x c y _ m m m u m Z _m s a C Oa c d rn S o m o U W O 0 E m f a m c z O a m o E aTi m E m ' w m O o M° m -�` y= E 4 c D m m c7 C7 Z d a d �' C7 (7 S z a° a Co) W O9 E O E t6 W = y C W U o a e� 3' v G t C 5. } CD LL O N LL 0 N C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a>� a o A' W 000 LL O N V 00 " a \V /C/� V t0•1 � � W � LL N tNp V N 0 .cc O O m O N O O LL O O 0 Cl) N O N O o a. LL m co 4n 0 c d � m 0 o M Z L U O N (n O L O N N V CL ~ H U O d o- E c m 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 000 'R, 00 " a V t0•1 � � M M M � tNp V N 0 O O O N O O O O O O !O m 4n 0 0 0 O N O N V 0 M O O VU 0 0 O O YU 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 °v ° °o ion c0i �` °o voi t2 0- Ch x r x o L ? F U W N W U1 fn :: N W �w� LL d m c r€ U� c °c a H U td m m a m o O m u c m x E x= m 0� v t s x w c 5 a m °m E m v a Z v= o rn O 0 3 rn m m m d '^ w m 5 'o m N L o �' o m o E E 3 '� ¢ m ci CQ C7 C'1 C7 2 .� i O a a a N vi y f >> a U w 0 0 E �a a N 3 0 0 0 0 t0 " a a °o 0 N O O VU 0 0 O O YU 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 °v ° °o ion c0i �` °o voi t2 0- Ch x r x o L ? F U W N W U1 fn :: N W �w� LL d m c r€ U� c °c a H U td m m a m o O m u c m x E x= m 0� v t s x w c 5 a m °m E m v a Z v= o rn O 0 3 rn m m m d '^ w m 5 'o m N L o �' o m o E E 3 '� ¢ m ci CQ C7 C'1 C7 2 .� i O a a a N vi y f >> a U w 0 0 E �a a O O O O m O O } O O O N m N O LL O O N � N - LL I 0 N c O O O O c O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 4) O o N � V O G O cu 0 O Ac+ W LL O N .5 cu �• L (L o N .C) cu O LL N N O o a` LL O N O N C m O V � N O O m Z L 0 m � o � o > o _ m W, O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O G O O O O O 0 O N O O 0 N N O V � N O O O O O N � O M N !� 0 m o 0 3 O° 0 0 0 0 0 N o o � t e °o 0 o° °0 0 0 N y° M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O^ N N h O O p d 0 L o ? N N 0 N U U N N a m E N o o m R U 'O c E E 0 (D m S d T K m d E 2 2 li o o w p 0 U p t E C o �o o o > y a 20 (D (D zar m m (7 c w w 0 (7 0 O z Z ` c E 'w m U � a, a ° co LO o r�l o colN n U- I 0 N LL C3 N V C co LL O N .5 G } 0 L O 2 N c O ce) LL U O N Od LL O C d N O co L Z O (n O 0 U 01 T FT CL U O CL C U 8 c m d m 2 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 N °o °o N d N Z d fp 41 V V N 3 a �y N _p 2 y_ m U O W ¢ t s O O O O O O O O O O O O O° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° o g ap O O O O N O N N 0 I� O N O N t0 C] r N N O r (p 4Il N N N lry lh N W N N N IN W N W m W 111 N N W -E w 2 S A m N E gg N m w 7 d G a a$ E 3 c w o= d y A > >. c a d c a ry E m E x = E lL 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N � N @ d y N N 'C O OCi Z-' O N N m 9 N i5 != E W �¢'cc)a wt7 �E I 3' a O� J N N I17 LL O N V_ 0 N O O a } N _N O O L o N o O 0 0 ^V L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc 0 0 O N 0 O 0 Q) O O O O 0 0 0 0 LL o O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O N H N .5 cc O N t0 16 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } m 0 0 0° 0 0 0 l O N N M M ca m' -6 O O M LL c O V m y \f M N O N o ,;- a` LL O N N N N N M O N c O 0 O O O ° elf N 0 00 L m Z O O _N O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H N M O N t0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 N M M ' M N m' -6 O N nJ N OI 46 N (6 « M (D .f ' N (O c O V m y \f M O N N N N N M N O 0 O 0 O O O ° N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W 0 0 0 N OJ Ip 0 � � 00 N O O O N O O O p O O N O m N a 00 00 0 O cli N N 0 0 C o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N N o O° r O N N N M A ° 3 r M � c r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O> N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N N O O N O N N O O O O N O O O N N N N N O O N O N^ O f� N N N r N N N m n N m to O O O" N 0 6 V O o � L C Z fA U t U) n U U W w N N n w w fn m o d m N p m w L N w v w N m g T H x w w w `n E E m d w w m w i° E 3 m A d d a Z+ W a m w U' F- a m m y a m d m m m w 3 a m O E m N Z Z _ N O E m 0 O 0 O N O� O 0 E y H O 0 O C 0 w Q m V 0 w C7 U C7 0 Z O V w U U2 Z y L p a 0. E U N A N } 0 u o N (D 0 N C m So $ooaSSo a } To A' Y/ o is of o o c LL. o N U o c N [h C M M V ("I N ^ N O m 0 0 0 C d 4) SSS LL � S N C ri o 0 0 V fp (O }0 N L o N cc O LL N m O o IL LL 0 C N E 00 0 Z L U L Q Q) C o 0 m CL � 0 O O O O N O m co O N S S S 0 0 0 m voi O N 0 0 0 0 00 0o S rl: m N O r (h N m °v M O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N M N N N pf m N N t7 CJ O h N U) 2 m x 0 i~ E a> m N m x m .0 m 2 N m S= V v ii a a a y Y U � o U ocV , 2 p N p y _ LL F p t m t v E m o E c €�za3'u�ii����3 2 ¢ � w °o V 0 0 voi S t7 CJ 0 0 0 O M °o M 0 0 0 O S G S S o 0 O O O O cli O O O O O N Cl c1 m p N C1 N a W d W W m W Z` w 'Um v '� m m W w c m 0 N a12 m m N C U N 5 Ci N O m 0 9 Y Y T U W C tp N 6 m U U (7 2 0 it a° N Mu 3' 5 c t a 8 So $ooaSSo SoSSooSB a vi o is of o o c r vi o ui c o c N [h f0 N < t0 t0 [p M M V ("I N ^ N O N O N V 0 0 0 0 SSS S ri o 0 0 V fp (O N N O O O O N O m co O N S S S 0 0 0 m voi O N 0 0 0 0 00 0o S rl: m N O r (h N m °v M O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N M N N N pf m N N t7 CJ O h N U) 2 m x 0 i~ E a> m N m x m .0 m 2 N m S= V v ii a a a y Y U � o U ocV , 2 p N p y _ LL F p t m t v E m o E c €�za3'u�ii����3 2 ¢ � w °o V 0 0 voi S t7 CJ 0 0 0 O M °o M 0 0 0 O S G S S o 0 O O O O cli O O O O O N Cl c1 m p N C1 N a W d W W m W Z` w 'Um v '� m m W w c m 0 N a12 m m N C U N 5 Ci N O m 0 9 Y Y T U W C tp N 6 m U U (7 2 0 it a° N Mu 3' 5 c t r 3' c t c �@ o00 oo0 os o 000 0 Q) p p° °° p C p p p p N % O O O N O O (p m O O M O N N N O O N N O N r N N f0 r N T N O } O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LL O O O O O p O O N o 0 0 0 of O O N ui N c ro N a m m O N � 00 M °0 } U- o o N 0 N m v c o c� _co a u ° 0 0 0 LL O O O N AA'' N o M ° W N r m V [V N c cu C 0 0 0 A' LL °n V/ N m r of N y d .cu G o 0 0 ° o °0 0 0 } a ° ° o L°n °m LL O N N e co of N of cNV .N- r m m V M m �U D °o °o °o °o 1 o° 0 ° m L L 0 O N 0 C o a` m V N N N N O LL LL r o 0 c N E o m o Z L U CO O L N c U _ � (n � U y c N T H O U U O O t0 Z Y d 0 C O N 0 G U = N C f0 c N c C Y E �o "O F m E '° m O V 4? > D w m M O o m m° m U' C7 E z .a O, a _ E m C) o r 3' c t c N N O N 00 O N LL 0 0000 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 p 0 0 0 N (O G1 O O N O O V O O O n° 0 LL O o 0 N m o 0 LL N o 0 O 0 N m o m a 0 cc (L } o o N LL p N O N W c } o°o °o_ 0 00 00 3 AC 0 W t o 5c LL O o O N cc 000 o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 L ` p 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N o l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N tU O N O O 0 O o O c 0 0 0 0 o vi o 0 IL } LL � N N N N N N t'I C'I [7 V N O O O N th N th M O N O O Cl 10 V N T w N m E co N Z lL O z N -C o o U N w W Y (/J Y y N w a E E p N Y `,c w N N W IO w E w3: LL @ W O @ m C C U. �' m m d m m a F w d w w d m o d Z x d Z a Oi C 1O C C (0 =0 N N E d C J YC O N L N@ @ Y Y 7 T C D. N U U U@ N 'O E T L E@ O@ L N C Y S o 0 w U' U' o U o w @ @ @ v @ @ m L 'a @@ N @ @ r a '> r @ E @ o @ CL d a Q m m w (7 (7 O c9 z O a m m fn F w E z 0 U V � o g o 0 0 } � 0 0c� } N LL O N LN O N C cc a �o N U C LL N •5 LL O N ♦V O CD LL z N 0 a`LL N N m E m z iL 00 U 0 to d CL a d C C N N o d CL E C 0 m 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 c o 0 r N 0 O O O O N N 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O N N M h N N M y 2 m x � " d C yCy Y g C L U O m E d =N m°a m A E�8 i ` y= v a x 0 0 4 W O co K N V C N a N a c y y N 39 U� v FL g 0 c E° E_•6E a �mi� E�za3$3�rr3 = Q 3 f. C t J N N }L O N } LL N O N L _cc a. } N LL O N C W L}L O }� N •ca LL O N L O O N IL } LL E C @ O Z O Li 0 V H ~ O V N m 0 C 0 O @ U U c d ° O ro m m 0 0 N m o° C 0 0 O O 0 N 00 0 CD N m d U LL z= m y C Q � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o °o co vi o �n 00 °o o m 6 C5 t/J _rn _ 2 O O U O Z 0 C O L m 0 O $ F E �n rn �' Ein w w In N tO W 0 0 (7 n 0 0 0 U a m v n Lj (7 = �j m z r m m LL v, ti_ c ci d d p� 7 9 Y Y 7 mu o a W W Q1 U U U U' U J J J J E J i U d g 2 c m Q r a 0 O O �n w w v C 0 L a w N o O O O O O 0 ° S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O 0 ° M O t0 N C m O CI O O O � m 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 t m o G m o 0 a i0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o °o co vi o �n 00 °o o m 6 C5 t/J _rn _ 2 O O U O Z 0 C O L m 0 O $ F E �n rn �' Ein w w In N tO W 0 0 (7 n 0 0 0 U a m v n Lj (7 = �j m z r m m LL v, ti_ c ci d d p� 7 9 Y Y 7 mu o a W W Q1 U U U U' U J J J J E J i U d g 2 c m Q r a 0 O O �n w w v C 0 L a w o m 3 S o ° N O Ln � � m C t C O 0 O 0 o o � v m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o °o co vi o �n 00 °o o m 6 C5 t/J _rn _ 2 O O U O Z 0 C O L m 0 O $ F E �n rn �' Ein w w In N tO W 0 0 (7 n 0 0 0 U a m v n Lj (7 = �j m z r m m LL v, ti_ c ci d d p� 7 9 Y Y 7 mu o a W W Q1 U U U U' U J J J J E J i U d g 2 c m Q r a 0 O O �n w w v C 0 L a w m� } F LO N N O N LL N O Ni c 0 0 0 cu y0 p0 1n O 1� N a a. N N O C) °o 8 N C O N (h N S OO g o r O O � vi o + N •5 i 00 LL L O N �U cu o co LL ON C } d LL 07 C N N O Z O LL o O L U N bi CL N CL H F N C G a E c 'm 0 8 SSS S S o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y0 p0 1n O 1� N YNJ N N °o 8 S O O O N (h N S OO g o r O O ai c vi o 0 0 n °o 8 S C0 o O o O N (h N N a N N r O [C 0 0 ai h C G 0 NJ G fV N N W x t N W m W fn N N m N N W N w N, In f/1 U) L m W m E d O 3 �' m y m E a m °m E m mO E c x d m n E y m m 0 .� 9 o m w t o 33 m m c m m > J a s a y w N H '> C7 0 E 2 O a C7 z w 3 C Oi J c cc a V c CD C �T T co LL cli L O N LL LL N O N O LLo N rn LL o N } co LL O N 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O p O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O o O O O N o m r 0 0 O N A 0 o 0 0 000000 0 00 d LL 0 on m °o N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m N m N N N V V M h 0 O 0 V ry C N O p t o O O E p p O O I p m O N N Z N N = O Z o O t U 0 m U N m U) U U U W > ai 0 �, m N W y. m CL T a F- m T W ry O U p p Z V 0 m N C 0 == m lL m c _0 ¢ o = c O p N W U U d R O R O Y J CR m Q M 0 o n E Lll N 2 Q c V N N U O O O O O o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N 0 o O p O0 In N N O O O [Op � O O O O O o O O O 111 O N 0 o co o m v o 0 o m N � N N 0 O U N q O o 0 0 O p O v o O m Oj O N N V 0 O 0 o o O O O m N N O N o m r (NO r O N A 0 V r d LL N 00 00 T 0 0 0 0 t. m C N = t o LJ LLJN E O I m O Q Z N = O Z o t U m U N m U) U U U W > ai N �, m N W y. CL T a F- C T W U V7 Z V m N C 0 == m lL m c _0 ¢ m = c O c N W U U d R O R O Y J CR C lU Q M E Lll 2 Q c O O U 0 O O O O q O o 0 0 O p O v o 0 m Oj n o N N N V 0 O 0 o o O O O m N N T O m oID m m r o O O O o O O O 0 N O 00 0 O o o O O O m N N m C5 c m r (NO r O o A 0 V r N 00 00 3 0 0 0 0 t. C N = t o O O o m O N 0 0 0 o O O O O O O 0 N O O O O O O O o O O O m N N m m (NO r (mD A 0 O N t m p� dmm3� v�Wmm m LL m m d e ✓Vi U^ m O T V m '0 m {G _N S d N R 0 Y CO �U C9 O �U O �O Tn mw ¢mo L w Q d a w s C aL C S cc C �5 cc LL 000 S m �' °o °n °o m Si o m S `O °v S S 'd N a mi °O °o o 'o °v fO O �- O O (O m O N O m O O O Ol G7 O m M .- O ni (V t+I m Q li .- M N V V O O N S LL 0 N m LL M m } N O O O O O O O O O O p V O N Ci S Ol S N (D M 16 Vi A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i N S S S S S o S S S U- N N 00 m q; °Oy O O O 1 N rn LL O o o $ 0 0 0 0 N m O m m S y m N m N V Ol m 00 O O O O O O O O O O O LL O O O O O O O O O O O N O tp m N M O O N N r m m m N °6 S o° S S S °o ° °o ° °S 0 0 0 0 0 0 a �o $ o Cl O N O O O ( Op O O O S p O S S N O O O O y N- 10(l gyp OfJ lmh Ol r O t0 O N O [O r m m N K W O N f0 °N llJ N N cJ 'C } (p LL LV N M r N N N t7 N N N N CD N N M m m N c m x w c E Q z x m L L Y m 0 U � y O d d Ui a w w w c y w v w m N c c 2 T Fes- W W E i' w W W E W m x W i y m x x a= a a a ~ C C c y a m- y a = N N 7 m w, m d im 1- q U 0 rn . N U mmo 'tn = z U LL U H t� N �. g C C cp o m 3 E m c E O ID 8 x z a a a N m U) r >> a w U U' i 'a m C7 E z E c 2 O U � t 3 c �I J N } N LL O N } N LL O N O O O ca O a O LL N V O C O cc 0 p p O (}L O O O O O O o O .0 C } I m w LL 00 LL O N O O m O m LL z N O a} LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O) Y] p7 (p M N O L U 0 p p O O O O O O O o O m w LL 00 O O O O p p O ° U N O N O r r O VN1 OJ O 7 O ° ° °° O y o 0 °m M o °0 °o ° o ° 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 ai 0 0 N p N m M 0 co 0 o N o .6 O O) O (D N N O O N rn E C_ M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O h N N O o O � O O) Y] p7 (p M N (p N 4l] L U N � c o N U 0 m w LL 00 C_ U v d `6,6 L 0 O N E E 2 E E m (n r 0 �n °1 E 2 2 U w w w = m o o a n m E v u. m m w m m m r r m w y a p a L d n o. C` N m U lG Y A N N w' C) O a (n !a cif d W r C m Q � a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N N O Lll N O N w w w N fn w w (/J w iY W w Y W N N m m m m 3 d m O y 0 w c� 0 .o C U m m 2 m W �p N U (D p� T m p m 0.9p t> >. c n 5 m m m o- E 61 U 0 � J m Z d VJ >> O U (7 W 0 3 c t i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m O 6 O O O O O h N N O o 0 0 0 O) Y] p7 (p M N (p N 4l] •' � N nI N � O N w w w N fn w w (/J w iY W w Y W N N m m m m 3 d m O y 0 w c� 0 .o C U m m 2 m W �p N U (D p� T m p m 0.9p t> >. c n 5 m m m o- E 61 U 0 � J m Z d VJ >> O U (7 W 0 3 c t i 0 °op N p 0 O N tp r A O O t0 L' N O O O LL o 0 0 0 N N o 0 N R M } N O o U- O o N O m C cc a ° } A' LL O N V/ V LL. C c } O O O L O N n m O a �V li 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl d oO 0 0 o 0 0 N c o O N o o N N vi p m p 8 N N d} ttq N aOD LL N M N N_ �J C E a z= °o z° n U (n F U U N W C c S U� a 2 C o 2 N N �'r = c N E U c C 9 N m m c i o. g E m A 3 E m 'C U' U' p E F O. O m z ¢ C7 C7 c7 U' E 0 i 3 C T } O In N LL O N LL N O N C 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 LL O LL N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N O 0 0 0 LL O rt� 0 N O O W m .5 N O N �O V L } 00 O N L O N .0 •V 0 LL n O N o a` LL O C lU O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O W m N O N �O V O) n n O 6 O N cli N �- O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N o 0 0 0 0 N W CD W W m N YN O O N N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W pI N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V n N O N N � O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 CO 0 o ci N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 o N o N N o 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N W O N N N Ih N W N N OI (7 C) O N N r N C'I O m h n pOj N� O N N N [h y (p y N (7 N N [7 N V L. Z (n O 0 h U C5 0 V% N V n m o m y m h h m p w m m w x w y m 0 -�' m m o' U U` m y = o >, v m E a m a E C C w m ° Z ?� Y ?: Z O 9 O c o x m w N d m m c m m 3 y v o m t o m U o 2 v ^� c m x am c m m v m z m `m o f >. o. E o m 0 w O a? E_ 0 w 0 O E M z O a t m (7 U' E 2 d a rn Y > C9 o m m o o m o 0 a rn Daa 0.w E00 =zm �0 w0 E a` w 0 o a 3 c i r N m N } lli } N LL O N LL NI N C _cc a O S 0 l}l O N V 0 cc N C •5 00 O M LL O N 00 LL N O N o aLL m e� 0 c d O � m O O O co Z A O L (n O L O U) 0 w CL 0 CL ~ I- 0 o V U N N O N 4 c E m o U O S S o o S S S O O S S S O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 of o vi o $ of of r vi o O O O O O o O o 0 0 m m co v� o l00 V m N h S S 0 0 N O M th e� O O O O O A O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 o V a3 �1 J O O N N O M 0 0 o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 of N o 0 6.6 o 6 o r o fc vi ec v o o n N N V O V �D N N N N N M i0 i0 l0 V ��O N N cn x L y U p O r m o 0 ? � 0 = w dNw w w U viay f a m y m U N w m t w w P y w N m w w E w€ m x w v m U m c a m w y m 3€ O a LL o m c m g N rn o g' m m c d v m d w c a U 9 E rn m e E y m 3 m Y> i a m U o 9 m m m 'm d m d c o m v t o m c w m¢ m U C7 (D (�J = w O a a a 0 0 w f =a` w a O 0 O O o 00 0 000 o O O O o uj p i N LL O N NO 0 °o LL N M cc a o o 0 0 LL N N U C fC }° o0 0 3 0 }r -A N o 0 0 L W o 0 0 LL O 00 00 0 N N N cu O a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N 0 m oo c N o0 00 0 0 o vi ui o c c 0 0 O — LL} LL cu C 0 Z t U 0 c t N N N Q N V U N U N S S y to m c c W W m E CL T F- N Y fn V1 l/J N d S 2 O �? j o o U N O fn N F- N 6 N N N 0 m N N 0 4' U .� N N N N t d� p l7 m W V U O �p W w d -o N U U m= 2 0 T W E Coo Y c x m W �p H C N C (6 y Z y i� m L 2 o N c O O Y N O m U � S :—° w_ N d Z` v F a 6¢ b VI G. N W Ol N c N~ c m W o tG [7 Z' c N c m w E c �`e a� t E �. o. E Y c c c c c v v C C C� t a C j U W (7 C7 E O a m U'0 (7 E Z d '= 3 F ~ m a 0 f �`- w' c7 00 E E m _ ¢ 5ia W Q =_ li a'i C) LL N N C d LL N V C C � LL O }� N C •5 } 00 LL O N Oco C O N 0 cu O C 75 E N Q' N O m L Z CO O L U 01 CL U cc O N a 0 0 0 M 0 M 0 0 0 k N 6 0 0 o di O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 N O O O O O N O N N N N N s t2 0 0 0 T N 8 N t W � N AP N N O N w d N N N m y d w N w 0 fn w I i w .v v y m x wNN m W w E m NN i H N N m w g ,t m 3 W e c 0 R_ a m W o V d d w m 3�z 'm ao E '� c o= v c m Z o d .N- °' c h m m O o 2 c a m E m E �e E a n€ m m m H 'Z E K Y ai "c O a' f z a a° in a E 0 0 E z a y¢ c7 j w c7 = m �+ w m s LL a 3 '.a N J N a o }.6 0 Lq LO Lq N S LL O N LL N N C d LL N V C C � LL O }� N C •5 } 00 LL O N Oco C O N 0 cu O C 75 E N Q' N O m L Z CO O L U 01 CL U cc O N a 0 0 0 M 0 M 0 0 0 k N 6 0 0 o di O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 N O O O O O N O N N N N N s t2 0 0 0 T N 8 N t W � N AP N N O N w d N N N m y d w N w 0 fn w I i w .v v y m x wNN m W w E m NN i H N N m w g ,t m 3 W e c 0 R_ a m W o V d d w m 3�z 'm ao E '� c o= v c m Z o d .N- °' c h m m O o 2 c a m E m E �e E a n€ m m m H 'Z E K Y ai "c O a' f z a a° in a E 0 0 E z a y¢ c7 j w c7 = m �+ w m s LL a 3 '.a N J } F N LL O N } LL N O N C cc a (D o N V C ca LL O ♦� N cc •5 i } OD LL O N W LL YO N c O N ._ O d }L = O c N N m o a t z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (^ tD N O O r Y1 O of O N N OJ N f") O (O N (O N N 1� y N V M V (J N N N N N N N N N of N N N N (O N N CS V O O O O O 0 0 0 0 p ° O O ° O O O o 0 m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v O O O O O O O O O m N N N a N a fp V N u1 � a0 U (n O Z to L U ) U U w N w N N N C d y Y w a a N N 0 0 a w w y N N w w N w N w w N CL > T H y U N m W W y y 0 '� N m W W W� ~ O w d a m w E E O w Y m W m w m E 3 m m y 3 v m m i i o C C° >°, m o y m `m c c a F` O O :: y m d m a m§ m 0 'o v m° O 3 m Z m a u c N (0 3 U_ y m 5 a o r d m d w m a m O v E m i. m z m m o m t d c c> m m o w U' C7 0 c Oa "¢ m U U w C7 C9 O c7 2 i z O a a a N m m 1°- > 0 '> a 0 w L7 C7 E i z 0 a= 0O 2 U A C t C N N N f�1 °O °O ° 0 O o ° N N N N V O O O O O O O O h O N N N a fp V N u1 � a0 U (n O Z to L U ) U U w N w N N N C d y Y w a a N N 0 0 a w w y N N w w N w N w w N CL > T H y U N m W W y y 0 '� N m W W W� ~ O w d a m w E E O w Y m W m w m E 3 m m y 3 v m m i i o C C° >°, m o y m `m c c a F` O O :: y m d m a m§ m 0 'o v m° O 3 m Z m a u c N (0 3 U_ y m 5 a o r d m d w m a m O v E m i. m z m m o m t d c c> m m o w U' C7 0 c Oa "¢ m U U w C7 C9 O c7 2 i z O a a a N m m 1°- > 0 '> a 0 w L7 C7 E i z 0 a= 0O 2 U A C t C 0 0 0 0 o .n o � 0 N S 0 0 C 0 0 0 O M N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 O O V y V M u a u u V S °o N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00 •5 N O 6 v ( G G a O 0 C LL N 0 r_ N W N O O 0 0 L U 0 0 N T 0 i o 0 0 U 00 LL O o r 0 0 N n h m S S O 0 0 0 0 o .n o � 0 N S 0 0 C 0 0 0 O M N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 O O V y V M u a u u V s� °o °0 0 u i 00 •5 A b u .0 0 C LL N 0 r_ 0 W N 0 0 L U 0 0 N T 0 c N 0 0 CL E 0 U 0 0 0 0 o .n o � 0 N S 0 0 C 0 0 0 O M N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 O O V y V M o 0 m M 0 in �c in m m u> in m N S L P V d U Y= O d Y N O N U1 F O N j E� y d == v o co o a c a v es y U° p d V c c a c 9 c¢ g g g d L o 9 m 0 0 za3'i,��ii��r3 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 vi vi o N M M M M M o z N m w m w U m N 8i wway �M ,�,ww 2 d a w€ 9 m o a y d a F- m Q c c a d d W 5 y d U W, z O 8j a c 10 a U d d a 'm f3 C CL iw s� °o °0 0 0 00 00 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 m S S O N N M < V d G e 0 0 O O O O O O O O S S S O 0 S o O v i of o v o o v o 0 a N a v a M o 0 m M 0 in �c in m m u> in m N S L P V d U Y= O d Y N O N U1 F O N j E� y d == v o co o a c a v es y U° p d V c c a c 9 c¢ g g g d L o 9 m 0 0 za3'i,��ii��r3 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 vi vi o N M M M M M o z N m w m w U m N 8i wway �M ,�,ww 2 d a w€ 9 m o a y d a F- m Q c c a d d W 5 y d U W, z O 8j a c 10 a U d d a 'm f3 C CL iw O Q. LL m ry N O C O � N O m O Z L (n O 0 x c U N O = O N w 00 x y E 1°a d T ID W w m w x x N c c o a o o d o m c a `° o d 0� m Z c a;i .Y z c y N g LL 3 $° o t�- L l0 N E N N O L 0 9 O x N d a c m w vi '°- >> a w t7 Cam! E z° m CD 0 E z a v 'o r= 3 h E m _ ¢` 0 o 0 N ao r o° 00 c> N U1 N m N °o N ai c� °o N O m N m M r m t C a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 °o 0 0 0 0 } O O N O O t tm+J O O O N O O y y N o O O O O O N o N } N o o 0 0 LL O N m ai a m a m CJ } N ° °o ° °o LL p o o i in N o o m C cc a } °o ° °o } ° LL C) o o ° ° N o o V o o m }� o o° 0 0 0 ry o o o ° ° O O cOD h h n 0 n n m 0 O C a O io G � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o i LL �O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N c c � � m m r cc O O W o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o c c L 1 o p o ° °o 0 0 0 ° °0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o c c L` p 204 Lri 1 0 N ao r o° 00 c> N U1 N m N °o N ai c� °o N O m N m M r m t C a ti N O N M N O N cO C Z LL o COL� O N H ~ C C co O m CL E g U M O (0 0 i O O H O O n O r m o LL O N o u1 } LL N 0 0 Q N m � W LL O N ♦ ♦ V co o o N d •ca } N LL N N ca LL O M N O N a} LL cO C Z LL o COL� O N H ~ C C co O m CL E g U M O O O O n O O m o 0 o u1 d 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 m � ai o o d o c� °0 3 0 m a C C C O 0 0 m o m � m o 00 O 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N o O v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi 0 0 0 0 u? N O N 4n O O In O O O (O O O O O O A O N O N O O O N N LL� I m m y m m E O m � a a � O S 0 O U (n (1 W W N W w N w W W W W w m d m 3 m y W w w m w W A m y 3 m D d a d n OI T N N U N _N w f w N y O C d N Q N 0 V N O m 0 2 Ol m O C O 0 C w m U U c7 x J J J J z O a a y w r° > U W U' E 2 z O a a` w g v c 3 C L a e �� o0 } N O � r o } N Q 0 Y o LL O c c N o co } LL O N Li } N A' V/ LL O N V v m a �J N •co } N LL O N N S Li C ° O ° ° O O p O p tO N N N 'c >- CL LL M m so r in �n �e M x m U) E m m z = °o = i L 2 t y y ? N C N N H i E m m y N C m n O. >1 = N N N V ffi C N 0 0 0 CL F ?: _= N U U' 0 Cp < C W C c N o p= N E m N N m y y y m m c m 0 0 y E z i0 a .° o. E C m 2 U c 3 C L a e 0 Y o 0 }� l0 LIZ LL N } LL N O N c cc a N LLNN C cu 0 LL N .cu % N ` lL O /1 N .0 :Q O . N O O N aLL C33 d C N O Z O o LL O L U N O F F- C C c C C 0 0- C O 0 U C 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 m 0 0 °o n S ID t0 O 00 0 0 00 N O M V °0 00 0 0 N O � O m a 00 O O O °a X00 a° o° c 0 a 0 0 o O 0 0 O O 0 0 v m O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O IO O O O N N .6 O O O O N G O O N O O N O N O O N N A O O O O 1� O O tp N O N O N _rn 2 0 0 $ m O Z N O N N N E W W W fn = U1 YI �1 E w w v) is m W N O y to 2 to N : c c 0 N Y LL n a m U' w awi m a m U 0= �j � �E c r N LL O O C U N y_ 5 m a H W vii Z L o O p 2 d 6 w w _N d N OI Y Y T' O N V C t T y~ Y G C Y> m o U7 o m m m m m w Zc m o E > m J N N C D W m U U U C� Q t o w = Q r O a O U N T U N N N N m N � a` w n t c t s H i N LL O N } N LL O N 0 a LO 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 4) 0 0 o N V 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 O O cu C � M M N M LL N M N o � M N M M N C M O N cu O N LL N O C } CL LL O) C N O Z O o lL O L U) N T H H � U C C O N d E C m � U 0 0 0 0 m a r O 00 0 0 00 0 m � o a a o O o 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 O M O O N O [V O 0 °o 0 0 0 C 0 N 0 0 N 0 O °0 00 °o °o 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 °o °o °o 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 O O M M N M S QI m M N N M N o � M N M M V m M M m N N N N N N N W = N u s N W N W M m U) m N 0 W m a �mq 0 y 0� S p w :� o 10 a"i m a m I� 0 3 rn 9 m 2 0 d L o m 0_ x a a h S i 0 4 0 0 0 °m E m y= '= E a a a m �n ai �-° > a U0 (7 E O a C7 z a 0 'c h LL LL 0 0 N O m LL H 3 C L 01 e /C \v a a� V C co A� W ca 2 m LL at ) n LL o N LL N LL O N U- 04 N LL O N Cl) LL O N 0 v n 0 0 v O M 0 0 N 00 O m r N O N M 00 m n m 00 v N O 0 m 0 N m O m °o o° 0 0 0 0 N O r vi °o 0 0 0 ai 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O N O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N m o n om Q o O o N N o O O O O O N O O > o 0 0 o 0 m `t m o of m of ui m m v of } v o 0 0 0 0 0 m o o aD N N ip O a LL w N O V (") N V V _ _ N N - N tp T m w M t�l N� O 'O Ln V N T m a) C W N E U m Q Z > o P: 2 0 7E t U U) w N N T m w ~ 6 � U E E v n Z m �l a L w a a m� Wiz° o o(D 2 LU E m N 0 o 0 h a m U a L 3 U � C � ¢ t 0 0 N W u Q1 U N to m � a ac D y w m W U w N W U Y y D U a W W y 6 N 1p �' a m U� -61 L -6 LL QCj 2 Y V t d a) U a , U N i N a L Y Y m U CD J O D U W O 'U O y y W m U C7 2 J J o m n 3' Ov G S 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V v J S 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N O 0 O O O O S 0 0 00 1� aD r N Cl O O th �D �n N A �D N O o Of O O) N N O N O ) N 0 N O h Of O Co Cl! O O O N h N 2 _m C Y N C O w N W E °= u t w N w to N f/1 x y N rn c c 2 Lu w w m Y w 2 m d h (� i `v_ x 2 S y c o 0 o a Lu °- m m m d 0 E u 'a° c_ �' 4 U A m N x E V LL c g g u� C7 o E m i, m 2 `�- d m °m E m v m i6 'w 'c E c m r E >. n E s c c c c n m 5 "a vt o c w 0 E ia �mLDE ia3'v3E r=r=3 � 2 Q J J n 3' e t OI e S S O d0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 LL O N oo CD S Lq LL NO ion N. C N N V N a Y NI O LL O N V C cc LL C) }� N 0 i N LL O N .0 t0 N U. o O N S U- >1 o o LUOl C E I Q Z 0 O 2 L O •- U) d T H ~ U S N N 0 E C m o g U 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V v J S 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N O 0 O O O O S 0 0 00 1� aD r N Cl O O th �D �n N A �D N O o Of O O) N N O N O ) N 0 N O h Of O Co Cl! O O O N h N 2 _m C Y N C O w N W E °= u t w N w to N f/1 x y N rn c c 2 Lu w w m Y w 2 m d h (� i `v_ x 2 S y c o 0 o a Lu °- m m m d 0 E u 'a° c_ �' 4 U A m N x E V LL c g g u� C7 o E m i, m 2 `�- d m °m E m v m i6 'w 'c E c m r E >. n E s c c c c n m 5 "a vt o c w 0 E ia �mLDE ia3'v3E r=r=3 � 2 Q J J n 3' e t OI e S S O O 0p O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo om a S Lq uoi ion V N N V N O O 0 S o o c S O O •- S N [V °o °o o O S S N o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V v J S 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N O 0 O O O O S 0 0 00 1� aD r N Cl O O th �D �n N A �D N O o Of O O) N N O N O ) N 0 N O h Of O Co Cl! O O O N h N 2 _m C Y N C O w N W E °= u t w N w to N f/1 x y N rn c c 2 Lu w w m Y w 2 m d h (� i `v_ x 2 S y c o 0 o a Lu °- m m m d 0 E u 'a° c_ �' 4 U A m N x E V LL c g g u� C7 o E m i, m 2 `�- d m °m E m v m i6 'w 'c E c m r E >. n E s c c c c n m 5 "a vt o c w 0 E ia �mLDE ia3'v3E r=r=3 � 2 Q J J n 3' e t OI e r LI1 } N LL O N Nr C C @ O Z. O O L U d N C m c m O CZ. co U 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 00 C�o O 0 0 N O °o h O a 0 0 V 0 0 0 � r m N 0 0 0 N } N LL O N c 1 L LO 0 LL O N V c N M co u� hl C14 (V 00 m CO 0 0 } N 0 LL O N 0 a lV O o 0 t N N O IL LL Nr C C @ O Z. O O L U d N C m c m O CZ. co U 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 00 C�o O 0 0 N O °o h O a 0 0 V 0 0 0 � r m N 0 0 0 N 0 °o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O m O tD W N O M M O (O V1 O W W N m ' M O N (p N r r m N o r N < N � d c N C U GI U V N � a � m E2 o a UZ 'O C N zt, w LL 3 E L N N N C t� E y e N J A w az° 20 3 � ¢ O 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 m N M m u� hl [h (V 00 m 0 0 3 0 0 a m o 0 N 0 °o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O m O tD W N O M M O (O V1 O W W N m ' M O N (p N r r m N o r N < N � d c N C U GI U V N � a � m E2 o a UZ 'O C N zt, w LL 3 E L N N N C t� E y e N J A w az° 20 3 � ¢ O m d m O Y N m - L E N — n n w o E m m 2 N w W a N y w m U o `g ? w s w `" N m E m w w �C` m m o c a a W m °a n m o- O w' U 0 2 t4 j U a 'V f f= F 1` F m U C7 a` W a 0 M m 0 3 o a o 0 a � c N t C 0 0 0 0 0 Cl - d m o N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O try O O N O N O O O h r r o r N o N O O O N O of m N r 1: N r �- m d m O Y N m - L E N — n n w o E m m 2 N w W a N y w m U o `g ? w s w `" N m E m w w �C` m m o c a a W m °a n m o- O w' U 0 2 t4 j U a 'V f f= F 1` F m U C7 a` W a O 0 S cc (5 O O O pp 0 8 0 O Y 0 O N O O O O p 0 0 0 O O N % N °o 0 m (V V N (V } N G O S LL N O N S v L a' o A r. W ca •5 i� % N 0 S LL O o N N N % N °o 0 LL O N G O N S o O N p N o 00 t+l fV % O 0 N LL O o N N N m N O N CL`LL Q) E c m o Z O °o CL L U N N m O CL c E 'ca O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O O O O O S 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O � O�pp O N �Np N O O W d Oi N r N vN i cV N S S nN i N N N x L m x 3 L U N N W (n W N b W mmN y to U) c g N x U LL ~ t E r 3„ a a° m N >> a w 0 E 2 O a m 0 E z 3 .8 5 LL 3 OI 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 } O F N of o m o N (2 M M 1 O O U) oV N n O O O O O LL NO O O O O O N v N N o 0 N �- ° O O O O LL O N N o n o 0 OJ N O N N C m a LL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 N °p M ai m vi v vi o c m a °o °0 °o °O °0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -` LL NO o 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o °o O° a (V N r w ci o c £ 4.0 a °v c s �m a C v L o % N °o °o °o °o o° ° IJ' C:, N Ol o 0 (O N O O N N yl co t7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 LO u� o u� N o �n 0 0 0 0 o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (A p 04 - LL co O C N O m U Z (A O o 0 o m U O m U ) � N a (/1 N h = y m m N N h T 1> w" ~ m m Nvl 2 w U 0 o v o - n y m m w p d e w w w n U y N N Z ° _v x o Z v K c c 0 y uJ y y a y mV y a a d m 3 N fO C L Y 'O .� O l0 L 'C O N U O S N d C d' X^ �. _ N N U N Z N C c r m 0 o o o E m o m c m o E �' m° m o m E W m aci ° n c y y O. c S a o w (7 (7 E i z O a m 0 (7 E z a a �' w' c9 i z a a U w (9 0 5 a. N C6 O O S O n O N T (O LL N O N m a ° LL p N ° ♦� V N C LL O o 0 C .m M o }L ° O N o S o °°° °m ° o o o° °O °N o S °N ° °°°°`v o o o o o o ° 0. ° ° o° 0 0 0 0 ° o° o Li c o -r S V O r N 0 m N m O } LLry O c'1 lO N N M Oi fp y N N LL r cu O C N E m O z = °o d in U i g Z 0 1- U m 1 m E m vim w w m m w w mam T F A U W d A t W W y m '� m A w W WF x w ~ N mU U `° c= m a d E F m w w w w m m m m w v 9 6° m m �= g 'u- 2. ('! v °J c O m n- g y y c m c M -6 K x E_ m r c d C G c U yZ a a t m m r c a E C c m m e v -� t0 3 L° Y> Q m o (J 8 3 a x m x a m m E c O �? = O a t E 3 '� r �' w co U U 0 CD 0 2 � � � �� z 0 a 'a a° m N w t°- '> '> c ° m E F 2 ¢ w R` j O a U e� 3 e t ea Y m i N LL O N L N O N C M _cc O N o 0 0 O N N ° rl� C6 � O N V 01 GJ N N N 0 OI O O ca C O v ° LL o o 0 N C m O LL N /1 N LL O N 4-j �/U� cV d O Cl) L N m O N O a LL M O C 3 N 0 0 o O O N Z L U !n O L U 0 W N a) CL ~ H O C C CL c U O O O O N N m d O O O O O O O O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o° °o m d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N t°p N N d N O m N r N N Of 0 ° N m d M 0 O 0 ° o O o 0 0 O N N ° rl� C6 0 0 01 GJ N N N 0 OI O O O 0 O 0 ° o 0 o 0 N 0 ° N m d N z m 2 v v C d O O ) m v Z q m U 0 d - c° Ez0 o 0 0 U 0 3 A v o U m 2 o U LL E r c r Tc w E E F° w y U Z w ?� s d o K c c p s N w ° n o. w v g w v d c c d m o n e o v U p x v d `m o m o E p m m c m o 9 E y m° m '� 3 m m m d m v Y" a m U w U' C7 i O a= m C7 C7 E z a 'e i �`- F r w' w C07 CO'J (7 .� O a w in Q =a w a O O O O o O O O O m O N d 0 0 0 3 0 0 o 0 0 0 r 01 N v £ 0 W N D) d [O C r` i °o °o o O h N m m 0 0 0 ° °O °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O G N 0 0 0 o N O 0 1n 0 O o o 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O m n r M N N 0 N o o N r N N N z m 2 v v C d O O ) m v Z q m U 0 d - c° Ez0 o 0 0 U 0 3 A v o U m 2 o U LL E r c r Tc w E E F° w y U Z w ?� s d o K c c p s N w ° n o. w v g w v d c c d m o n e o v U p x v d `m o m o E p m m c m o 9 E y m° m '� 3 m m m d m v Y" a m U w U' C7 i O a= m C7 C7 E z a 'e i �`- F r w' w C07 CO'J (7 .� O a w in Q =a w a v cc_ } n N O N } O LL N O' N' C i N LL O N V C N O N C .cc } N LL O N .; ` m O N 41 O N o CL LL 0 a� O m r z U) °0 CL L U IT ~ C O N CL C 0 so so 0 0 C N N CI eG N � � Omi Ori A N O S G 0 i� 0 $ 00 -8-0 0° 0 0 N 00 o m °a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 OI O 1� O m O N r O m m m M a0 V N cm � tD N N [m M 0 m d m y Y _ N m N N d m 4 Z U m F LL c c m S j d Z ¢ G o °o N N W m 49 w W c N w N w v m m x N m y m U m c o m a c° x E W. a d c a m E m E x m t cg m m w m o m t o m e m m S "� D m (� .� .� i z 'a a O 0 H a E 0 IL m 0 W Q L w tc = s 3 e a J $ 00 -8-0 0 00 00 o N 0 w O M O G N G OI O 1� O m O N r O O O O O a0 V N cm � tD N N [m M N N d m y Y _ N m N N d m 4 Z U m F LL c c m S j d Z ¢ G o °o N N W m 49 w W c N w N w v m m x N m y m U m c o m a c° x E W. a d c a m E m E x m t cg m m w m o m t o m e m m S "� D m (� .� .� i z 'a a O 0 H a E 0 IL m 0 W Q L w tc = s 3 e a J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 }o 0 0000000 00 00 0 0000 m �� <�aam C'i M N U,� N 1+p1 N N N } N 0 0 O o 0 N M N (O o O LL ° 0 O 0 O cn In a � o LL a� N N V c LL 0 °o °o m A' C) N h V 0 N C i 5� G } N o° 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W� .0 mU m N 0 0 O O 0 O 0 o 0 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o c m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �n o in 0 0 0 0 N C O 0 M o 0 o [l) a In V t0 r r tG O (V c0 n V O [7 c0 aG O O O t0 O O) O N N N N N N N N O y O (O N (p O tp o ,Z-- a` L L U c N � (D E o m 0 Z U O CO 0 0 0 Z 0 = U o U) Ij U U y CL E W E w w E `w c o 2 2 s H N °a a m u d m t0 E O N c m m = E m UC U � u m O y m N E > O V N C d m m o m o m 0 Q Z 0 o m ti W C7 C9 Z O Ow U U v a U E� d W 2 N R _ W U LL Q U `m m 00 °O °O S o 0 0 ° ° ° ° y}, o0o So o$ LO l}L O N >' N LL p N O O O O m °v S S S 0 0 C O 0 o 0 0 tV N O O N o ° 0 0 0 V1 C N G Oi O O O S O S 0 0 O o S g $ S S S °O °o °o S o o O O o 0 I+NJ M N O C ySy O O N M N 0 w N N O S S S O M N N mD N O N S S S S S N S O S O N S S c Opc O O O S O O S O S O O y Ny O N �O t� d A N N N m O m V x°00 V d N .md- V ! N N^ w w N i0 0 n w �O N � f0 I� O !� O O A m x C N yCy Y 2 O t U U t E c. � u m c_ m m m m x= m m E Z m P D m w `E m m m m i m m d _m i i v m o 0 o a U w m A m 3 a (D iyy ° v U , a E rpp rpp epp 0 E O N 3 N N Z P C C OG N m x U LL O N 9 6 6 a t N z 52 m c m E v y in ° E c s d t° E �. 8 E x m C c c t o— m o m o m c m o y m3 t0 _ 3 "m A m m m m Y> m m r '> > Cg w (7 0 E m z 0 'a m U' U' E z a 3 'v i i i r H H 3 w p m x Q tea` w ED N f. C e /c //m Li } N A' LL O V/ C CA' � O LL W }� N C •5 G } N LL O N c O N LL m O N C } LL LL i9 O I C I N O N Z L (n O U U) N cl ~ F U C C o m' CL E c 'm U O O O O m °v S S S 0 0 C O 0 o 0 0 tV N O O N o ° 0 0 0 V1 C N G Oi O O O S O S 0 0 O o S g $ S S S °O °o °o S o o O O o 0 I+NJ M N O C ySy O O N M N 0 w N N O S S S O M N N mD N O N S S S S S N S O S O N S S c Opc O O O S O O S O S O O y Ny O N �O t� d A N N N m O m V x°00 V d N .md- V ! N N^ w w N i0 0 n w �O N � f0 I� O !� O O A m x C N yCy Y 2 O t U U t E c. � u m c_ m m m m x= m m E Z m P D m w `E m m m m i m m d _m i i v m o 0 o a U w m A m 3 a (D iyy ° v U , a E rpp rpp epp 0 E O N 3 N N Z P C C OG N m x U LL O N 9 6 6 a t N z 52 m c m E v y in ° E c s d t° E �. 8 E x m C c c t o— m o m o m c m o y m3 t0 _ 3 "m A m m m m Y> m m r '> > Cg w (7 0 E m z 0 'a m U' U' E z a 3 'v i i i r H H 3 w p m x Q tea` w ED N f. C e C W V ca ca 5 V cc LL lU 6CL) } ° LL O N i N LL O N L1i LL O N L}L o N co L O N n <o m 3 o� c S ° N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C O N d 0 O O O 0 m 0 o O M O N N n n t0 o O 0 O 6 0 0 0 0 o cc C O cp O N W ui o o 6 N fp O ° d LL ` N 0 0 0 ap N N VJ N [0 N cc ° C N 75 N _ E o ° m z L x U (n O L c U U) W L N Cl [� W W rn W !� a N to N m = y m F = h CL T W 0 N N m W L w m W m W N 2 0 fn m 0 F ~ n 3 m w y a m w m w m w w w 3 Y m m m m = �' K N a m C7 `u m a to y a y m m m °° O n U' m 3 m ° o Z V o U C c m c F 16 d c LL N Co E O N mO 0 E Y C O C m o o U 7 p z O a >> m j m O E �• ° z m a m a C z m 3 � _ 0 �5; n <o m 3 o� c S O U' N o LL N M N a >C LL C � \ N V/ C v LL c }� N LL a N m o Cl) LL N N O N O LL LL C N Q N L Z U � O L U I C, F- F- U c c O N Cl E m o g 0 0 0 m o 0 VJ 7 � O o D OI � m O a O � O N 01 n v� N N M O U' N o LL N M N a >C LL C � \ N V/ C v LL c }� N LL a N m o Cl) LL N N O N O LL LL C N Q N L Z U � O L U I C, F- F- U c c O N Cl E m o g 0 0 0 m N VJ 7 � O o D OI O 7 O � O O 01 n v� 0 0) 0 0 �i N O G N d r 0 co N O N N O C 0 N v o 0 0 0 0 0 g o o g o poi � (V Ln O d d y y d C m m E Z y 0 o 0 a 3 tics �� `oR C C C C N 3 Oi C e C FL Lo d ti L 4 f+ V d w !C L LE C a V t0 t0 d } C 3 F C } c� O O O O S H {V i a) V m m a a s w ° C m of _ O m m m C m y E y 3(D y N-0 m o `m E L E E a 2 w w av � E E.a° T 0 c � vi oa !?mo � m0 0i `0m Sot yo0t5 c 2 N ) O. c U C a Y O c V O C W° O m c m o 0 m E m E a Ear m-0a ° w o y m a N p yy °` d 8 N 3 a O O C N O m N O N O C T O C C m w _ d m O J 0_ L a ° 0 Cw w o ~ ° — � m L E -0 C ) m EC a v p N C N m O N U N ° E m N O Q N m L w 0 m m T Z y G Q L r m O W ° U r w L p -° ° ❑ w° C m OJI O "Co N a° w a w E° m ° m J C `O U L w oL Y E NNism xm3 a) a) U 0 m0 C m 'p m 0) C C m a N w L w E L w CD O C d (,% y m D1 a a C N y Z m 0 U v1 w Y W L c C a) U �. m 0 O m w D. L U v N N 0.0 C a;O m m U �a"C > E Q 2 2_ 0 0 0 c E m C X00 °�� �❑t�0E °E0> rm�Cx o m C m r C O ,� m° w° U n N C d.0 m m m G C m } J L U w w C w m m w m C L O c° c 3 C Y Z o 2 0 N v° m m a° w m .J. T Q L a m +�- m rm+ L C C m m I� m N D1 m p w O C C C m m= w T C C o E o CO m c E N m a m� ° o d N M o m m c ,°°-uu°-{m mc oCmo0:O -ami mcLioo �cmidm'm worn V7 in .2 Hm0UmET m0ao �oc�FE 0 m O w m M-0 m a w m m c w w m O m m I� m rCm�m LyoCD °° A0o o0(DCD> �o E c m y -= c o _ L w> E O pop L r a 3 _c E° p N E CM= r a C C J m C O D U w M C U m w Q N m aci E a y �:°. o m a) tfL a � c2 C t 0 0 = aci d = 0 w L m m a w C 7 N J a -� C U C O m —° w _U O C a m T m O O O C C ` m N E w y d 0 L N m m L E o U LO m C N E w y c w o d y o E 3 d 0 o m c o a 0 0 m L N ❑r- c O) E w C C m G d -m0 W r- 0 T O o m 0 d o J m C N O .m. cl m `m U M d a m d m a °o D °'wE3ac'imr��m `C°�a°i' o00Zoo�wct}'C_E LiLE t7 a N O of C - J "' CO °1 X w° O y m V C c a C O C J N C m '(kp r m° C r0, J p CO L= a W y m -° m m d N O C C E p ._ 0) m m° a G L a J O~ w 1p -O C E > d m❑ d_ m O O C "� Of O m J d U°vio2000m>, caawi — mcN4aci :°. Ti °C>. o w �N m d a Uc Lu a d N J' I N L Yp fC N o~ L" > N d m J d 12 E° d Ca 3 o C .. O m ,L„ o O J d •. ° r L° Y 0 N a) d w O N `O V w E °"- y w OI 0 0 E N ° r j d o dL >' m d'- C) C O m O LQ C °. 0 O me O i O N a N Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Z ONi ^ O a O N M O OWi O N N r N N W � N Ci n ( N O N a N Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q z Q Z Q z Q Z m M � O N a O m O a O m 00 O n N O n r V O 7 a N n z z ¢ z Q z ¢ z Q z Q z Q z ¢ z Q z Q z �D- � "o n a o m m n � � n r N a O W N M O N t0 r h N V M m r N N Ld (p N M n W M V O N r W V M N N b y a O N O n N M N N D N N O (D r cD N N M V r N r m M O a N D V N N V O V y 'Q O' a O N m W W N M N N tD N O N r In N N N N (p N N W M a O N (D V N N V v O "p a N N N M n N R N M C35 N "i l N m W N W M M N N Wes^ (MD M 01 a O N W O V N V M IA O O W O a N O N N W N M O V CO V N O M a N t0 N N In M M N W ry N N y M O a O N W rMO c0 M N V O v W M 'p o a N N r W In O N N O N m Ol N R W V OD [O V M N V N m O] N Op N OJ O N M a O N V n 6 Ln ci N t0 O V f0 Ol b M W H V cd N W N {y .0 � E O V C a N O z O Z z z z O 0) z U) ti z C N U z U m y f0 w z w O U' t7 0 y w U :"D w D ti W w w x O m 2 E m N � x 3 h O U v_ Y � ° U m m O 0 9 CI .. N � a w' t6 O U N C z Z) U) O ° W o f O O w O 0 N c m a ro d 9b C O ro a a 0 9 d Q d V v C 0 C G 9 C O U N 0 U G a d ro Q z z e 2 § ,)k2No § j U) r9 § L) ;f ON ■f$I § cN LL ) « ; sue z — c2204 — Lu ,)k2No m _ U) r9 EcN 1* ;f ON ■f$I /°ƒ cN cq ` sue — c2204 —mRE �ck�)/2/7 aIL�,m��r LU « .01Ncn aCL =2 ® u x�(7}/ —Ln 0 2 ��_°�g 002� /(7k °\\ m - ew�w= >' CL m �_ »k\\ = IL RCD00 ED C EcN cN mcw iR§AA(§ « u , —Ln 0 2 & o °\\ »k\\ IL RCD00 C kk_ /_\\ 2�ww = = � � ] @ @ f \\ f _ . k ( \ 0 c3 _o � OE a. IL zmw -c LOU )J))k e)) }\ § ]]]22 2 ■■)f§/ 3 3\3 WI It U r 01 L m Z y W � H C J N QL LL H Q 01 W a >. LL C m Z ui o F- `c W N F O I- m V N- U N� N (1) } LL _ C4 p V C N N O V O LO p C Q (O0 - M 00 M ,1. 11 O t` L) aL E rn O N v V N M (D 01 r N O) C V C N (0 M (D (D Cl) N �0 C C 0) N =mCL V 0 (D � ; , 1 L) .t. N % N 0 N 0 0 N 0 W N 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 .+ N 0 N 0 N 0 ap N d d N y = V V N a0 M (h N m O a (O M N O.! N N N p O (O N N M LL a W M N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 N c0 U N m O Y M N p 0 � E � L M E rn O N W V N M (D X y 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 ap V N h N rn f� N M 0 N M N O.! N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N N 0 N CL a O) O vMrn 0 0m 0 co U m N rn 7 N M r M O O r co V rn -p V' r N or m 00 m co O M O V co V O V 00 (D m 7 N 0 (D 0 N rn 7 0 m 0 l0 (O m w V O N N 00 N M O N (O N N O M N N N N in M N rn M f` M � M r r m N (D to l0 m f� O d N O fA EH fA UH EA E9 (A EA fA (A 69 co EA co EA a fA (A (fl b9 (A IL (D N Ln to M M O P �. Op N O v m V N N M (D fD W W M O m h M N U) O. �q' N M N V 10 V N co M M M M O 'd' fD W O M M M y N EA N EA N 69 N EA N EA N (A N EA N V3 N EA N EA N EA N EA N EA N EA N EA N f9 N EA M EA M ER M EA m 69 v °y 0 u C p mm O m O m rn O rn m O rn O m 0 rn 0 m 0 rn 0 o (D 0 ( 0 (D o (D m N m 10 m 117 cD (O l0 (O o O 0 O y r m m m rn m rn— N N m rn't N Cy C " � i (L U) m I E E o E_ o E E o E E E > E E E U U U O E o U o o E o E o c) 0 L) E C U U C D U U O U 01 C_ C 0 c O U E c O O O O c O U c U o J C m m a @ ° 4. an d (/U7 UU7 (n U) c C C C C C a m `E C E o 0 a a C a C a N Q. m � d C 0 C C C U U y .0- 3 x ;o 3 :°. m x 2 E E m �a 3 m U U) W LL W 0 LL W V W LL N W N N _N W W` U Z` 0 U y W L L m C m w- x p ns 0 � C m p❑ W ❑❑❑ W W t` (� s L- s m 0.' Ir ❑ U Mr 2 0 W' N H m Fm- 2 2 0 U) U a' m m - 0 0 0 0 0 F°0 Ha co Z) X >NQaaQQ -oaaa °O Q _ C O O O O Op o m m m m m :° :°. m o o 0 o_ Q_'_ _ O -C 0) w (D _ 0) _2 w o E EO E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E m w m w m w -00 -�O 0) V 0) -�O L -❑ L N U w ° 0) 01 0) 0) 0) 01 01 0) 0) U U U U () W W W W W W W W W m 00 aD 001212 2 212 2 ro d L C CL x W d V d .O L CL O r CE G 3 C �a a a V C A C w C N d w co 10 LL m C N 7 C d CL x W .6 W d .O aL O A E E z N C a u C 10 C W C d 10 LL l0 C 3 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O o0 00 00 O O O O N N O O N 7 6 y } r V O LQ N m C V O M O N m w n ao W N O O O O O o O O O N O O O to O OD pM O O O O S N N O O n � c0 O O O O O O O G O c0 r V O M o o in N M tV N V N } O cD O M n O) IL ry O tp O fV N N 0 0 0 r 0 0 m O N $ O N O O N O O N N N N } � V N N N V IL N M V c M O r N a N N rn W n � O N uni n } O O V O N O {L N N M � M c0 O O O N N N O C7 OI o0 � N Y O N N O N p C'i ch M th th •' yN cV0 N O O O O O N N N O N cmp cnp N{ } o 0 o a IL O� M N N g o 0 0 0 0 M M rn rn a N V I� V Ch m aOa N N •n— O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N G O M O N oNp N eD NN c+l M [V T t00 cq C� O tm0_ p� M N M N O O O N m O O O O of y C O O O N N O llJ cp M Y tD N V M O cp IL N N N I� M O O 8 O O O O N C A w W 0 F fV cp r m O IL 0 I�op� N o N lL l°l 2 Q: CO W f jLlw n I U c 8> ow lL IL 2 0 co rf N 7 C d CL x W .6 W d .O aL O A E E z N C a u C 10 C W C d 10 LL l0 C 3 N Lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O N N O O N 7 6 y } r V O LQ N m N W N O O O O O o O O O ry O O O L N V' OD ro v N 01 tV n O O O O O O O O G O O O O M o o in N M tV N V N N O p O O O O O N (6 V ONi r O r m n N c0 O N IL N c0 a0 10 (O N o g o 0 0 0 ci c M O r N a N W N V O N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N V 00 C7 OI o0 � N Y V Ci ED oc N IL ch M th th UJ N O O O O O N N N O N cmp cnp N{ } N IL O� M N g o 0 0 0 0 N V r N aOa N N •n— O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O G O O N N N eD O O ch O T t00 cq C� O tm0_ IL M N M N O O O O O O O O O O OOO C O O N N Y tD N r N OOi N IL N N N I� M N C A w W 0 F IL 0 I�op� o lL l°l 2 Q: Lo N 00 L V CL CL V CL G Z W a a Q W F LL O U) N '0 V Q m mm N N c m EE 0 Q VO>vm0UmU 0 >'N T - W n C 00m G v O U) O` - v C C C N 0 m C T U C 3 C N C E V 3 m u C L 0 m y y C 'U m . ;^- m;E o C C m m'- °c m ui .n 3 mC7 cv y „ D 0 3 0 ,m U c a y C N m 0 m `-' a= oa 0. J U m C "O = O m � J N m U C �j m aj Y Y O N C' o coN O N ��E °'Y ¢(D °'aOiLy fp U 'JO co 'O N 1 C Z' m a) 'j '= C a) m � L m> m N a> a) O N N C O= N ui C 0 a) N C N V �O Qt_pcpEmmD C !6 y a) lO t N N QEymxa _ O � '4�m'� U '- m — C�mU> 3 U O J m 0`m I d C O C T? N V O N w v Q `" w m V cl) N C d y cr— C o 0 J C C a) L r % E °tQ� T m 0 �° N C U N m 0 v v E V 'W C O C m E `o ac - t 3.� U 0 'O E r U U O m m v? 7 m m (.: N (n N N C m C O M m m 0 ac) a C„ 0 C "O C M.O. N N y N. � ` C MD -_ N C N- a) N I C(D O N m a) .N ci m a) U m (7 'p N w m U C a) m U p m c m E m U m C" N N r-:3 Ci to U C N rL. eN, 3 yy m"0 C m d V N O V Y O= C N o cc 10 ;° A O) A O A 0 N y a m .N. m Q) V J 0 CL y m m 3 M a' `o a) m m m^o J O C .0v m m C U>> of o O C m O O C cm N N 'C l0 N y N EvE m m T 'o N y N C m E m� m N y a� C .t. a) m O N . E m E 0 N O 0 � m C y ICU 0 0 m -OU"O "O m m N U!? C. o 0.a) y r a) y m N O U. �a .0 m m m C U ... 0 0 C C 7 O U J J 0 0 .0!E o- Eo 0 N E o m r m y`o o) � m U o E" � - m m -0 L/ ca m m C (n c m d N 0- m 0 N C C O T N 0- M Y m=`�m mm ami �d E > 0 my`� a Cow y 0 N E d ._+ J N O O J N O m U L m N 0 W N N C) C) NOOK N _ ..'_ -' m 0 I m �^ J C N m0 yy m"0 C m NU m U U o. mYON O a)C AJ 0 C 'O 0 O o m N E m V O 0 0 O O O O U 0 a) a a) m C O Q CL a X C CO ) z V 0 N O 0 � L° m L y 2Z c6 C C O ll T N a C m OCU y C X00 H 'N' d'a O m N X X X X X X �% N G y m N W w V O C N a) = C„ o U. y E N E r m m Q c ti m v 5 a' e o 0 0 o 0 o no°no 0 N U! 10a c E QmH yrm o,v-7 �r�maornrn gW Lt�y�0 C LL r N 'O N� ci 0 >,0 3N O F C L m 2 m y F J o c . m a) 0 N C Y v m0 a? 0 C o. lzr 7 m m g aE) m o V d o E E m CU� J d w g� � E� N 0 I1 >0 3 0. LL m m z a) .T y E ai j LL V v w= YC' ao ° Y,cr_5 Q � y d� o) 0- m m-6 ID gEm Q3 V yc)W�S Qa UEw J"my N pa o:p Q >N 9 ci y C iZ C Q O d O X d M amEC Qo. co 0i Um0 U° 7 E 2' �O � U ¢ ' ° m o .N . m-: . y ` p m N N N '0 ° 0 c m U m - 7 E Cw O Q L . 0 U) N U) -L > > E L or m a� y o2 y 0r 0`0 a am a w O o0 00 1- Oc t �0 oimo� d c m ? o 0 0 E.E U o° :o O ) X LL 'o a) E = W U p J d fc o 0 W U O co ' W w - �0a o o o 0o - ¢ 0 c N m v o E o L p o yc ° .0 CL E 0 0000 O n a) 0 0 O�L o-ma mmVo" �w U�� m 2`u� p.S Em WWNN L O m Q) c c N 7 Q m ,� d-o C Vi W O m- V LL c E �., m> m U) m C aS 0 a� 0_m c m -° x Co Z-0 m -a.. L '.= a Od w W m >. = V a a N m "' -� N C Q O) m LL Z. -''�� m F�� 0���=m> zovi (D a) Zc mo'=°wy zm C ,N C z m a z C C -O >` U :Q W T 0 `� W a 'O U .O LL a n> LL 18 ZQymco Q -o pmm EmCmccas 70 a0i -°°0i Zo° �axi- IL m m -° j d N �, >. °- L 2= c`v V .� 0 -O ° p -o a H LL N LL 0 n L N N m m E~ T -� J Ql W n C U O C Q U C LL .L. O y J N N N J 0:5 m J m a) ~ U m U C a) U Q N` .L• C Q m> Q y .0 U U 7 C m c_ C Q N °- U) m N > m M a) O a) L O_O��C O -E C Z O O 15 m TT�a)'m �'.N o'-0 H n m WLL 0"O4 -O m m a m O E E ._ a) L L n m .- O ~ aa) ; 0 ~ o° F- w w CD S LL LL LL 0 H >> F E m -L o N Q c N p c � Q >. Q.2 d o c m p o 0 C �oEm`'-. Um-oc W wy0 Ma�E �mco6mc W .- W a) C a1 W W u m LL ° m LL w a) w N a t U m m = ON CW a" O n O O o C- C 'O m O C L a) m 'O C N U) EU nm y-Om v vinwa 'y'rn N > . w O y L r 7 m c m ID C C 3 a) O N 'O C U ... 'O N N -0 m >� .- ° 00 O m m 0 N `1 'O U a) _ m oac0V0 6mL o N �cLi 0m - `m'O e-E'a 0- o Er M MCN -oa o-0o a° N« ° 0 0. m w °3 N U C E `- cV cN d aN. p N U "O C X S E c N ° o v m s m'U m o E m 2 0-o-O (D mE o N m c y o m N E E c o a 0 00 aNi x as m m c .� "3 o m =� ,� d y0 v mm� E `mu Qa o'� m °y O c .L.. O' o- O U "y01 ° E x y E y _m of 5 10 L 5'0 E c° m w c i m U p 7 a) a1 x N m C U O C O. O C LL m ,F w t9 N L N m 'y a .-� E L m a) U ._ m m- o I- 0v o y m o'E rnN m o w Si5?D2io z o cn 0 0 m c._o o f v md�4 -� wr=n c°i -oo c=aciOU �0m o' o' Em m U.L.. 0.0— C W N N A CO N j= 7 L E N 0' a o o j U m CL t0 s p a c > I E E .0 N j N c w�`0 F- ?' F m Q 0 �y��° aw,MQ) atC�C7 ai`m>.c=iM a�.� UID wo o CD 6c0c ami �° 9 morn as m -0 QmC F-o 30 aQ E�m ai Nagy f7��a 0c° -�coi O:° — m000 UN m J �o0 NmcLi E E'0 c.m Qom Qc W3 Fvo T'� m N w'mm" `OC7 aa)i O)z o n N E 0 z ca) = w m 0 m a ^N m 0,�n 3 E t0 ° N m N n Q w m Q v E O J cz ° LL a) O N pj w° O > > N U m u0i O N J ii O. 4 °> .0• m X O' C -L N 0 0.2 O F-m N00 Ua)m U U'U U ,..' C O C a) m C ( Np O m L— y r C m Cp �pT O C N y 0p E C M 4 r O N m U `L" C �0 °Q 3 m °« U N O N= O UC 'y CL L O c J m m �+ a V 2 O N U c n -0 O N C 6 J ) N 'C >>,— d a (°p N cE of oc rn -cU)F- a`o Jf0 ~NX�d cmo yM a)M mmn a)� -O >u 0a) ZWOO dd° cnd =JN mJC °,2c� E Ern MC .�oV'C. .o >N an d E 2 m J m m ° c c> c J r m m E y 2 W `o U m Q) m- m o p `m (D d E y N ~m UON CTV M.- E"N CN mO O °O) �0 N0r 3aNQm.o ,rnE? o�Qrm °i:; cm m�t.3� -- uNc mZ aam mr �� a >> `o v`o at �Y 3 X o m m m ?` E 2 u -o m m u; °a ° aJ m 3 � a) Qr N C (p D" N O .T) - C (D 2 C w >_ m= O N y y� c c m N U 0 C O L C O C O O U a C a m Y 0. m !_ O E m d N N c m m N L m .O O m O° N in o -O ¢ E m° E o 0 T O C o N C m m C ¢ �"� O c E 0 nm m c o 0 3 E 5 c 3 a U «p 0� o L N N N?> w °' Cf O C O° m O O ¢ C LJ m r' N f°a 0).— ' ate) a m L° c M -° o p 0 y ° c E O ac cc m o E L m o t m E ¢ ow J o c c a d m c `o m C C .O a) w T w Z W 3 a J C O"N 7 L m m a) � v 'o a) ` y a) L N O U) - m m m J a. U C O C 0 �E4) w cT pEz, N :E ce �acmrn� mm o -32m>. Z`�om aa)mNE O' U) m3 U5 0) V 0) C) L C J V N W la N to € J C J C Z C Z p° .5 -C Uo: J a�.ao�o ay O' o 'irN,>�O�w C c m' E`N� Q c° ~°�ccimy vmE Umw .. VNmJ0)a) -W QmL U. N 2- (D m m w 0 E a j M 0) E 0 � d y w.- c vi � c-o 0 Ea E aa)) ° ac a amY 2 m E E 5))E i NwS Zn ° Z C 0 0 c m a 0 m -0 a) N(Ma -0 -o a) am w 0 .m 0) M a) r � O O N c C m m y a)-a' C E O O d 0 .0 F m Q) 'O '� V N U Q) m N U 0 m O N V= a) CI'J" -)p CL o o c mNaa) m rn`oa°) °o Em@ v°-c cgca m ¢ 0 m y w aa« 2 no p 0 J o M t, oa a) dJ m r 'a (ap`o C .. O N N - V O C C m m m a) m 0 0 N� C a vi m m m E E `o c m 0 m o E °° v o E 2 3 m J o - m o N LL C y J 0 O Q m L r O N 0 U r a) N N m N mw N 4) y y ° a) V U O m m 0 O D° O L J ca mN w a) Cm 0 mN�$ CNN Q) >.m C�7aw � 7 m -O m E ° m J N m '� c m m T ' Y N E N O O) N C r c) C N m N a1 n. m C acpwp Oo y- o y a°i °c0�p oroaN m`m0 JEcoo-m 7 U = U m@ N d N G U y a) N o O) ° L O- m y J 'rC, m N Ol ¢ m O. O C Vi a) is iq 0 Lo m 0 p❑ m C C U ¢ d a) a) N m y° O 'a '> a) m C m r com aE m Na mo „`o o)c oa U_m �°- c-° omicoS o °= O -0N -.0a- om M N Sa) O� oc� c� c10 0.0 CL LL ° :3 a) OL ��. yN °C:°E �mm a EYCm ` C a) N a) N O) N= �+ J LD 2 a' a) m 2 C N W c 0 C m J O O O 0 0 w J J 0 Ea a) o c E U } -y N O tQ/J M 'O E () O. J ai z F.L. J w �.- a) ,F E w° K a Q2 c v L J- 0 E J U yj -C Z m O m p O m- a)C Oc m ¢�, �v V!_°aS;a Qaacao gc Zc rnaFm Eo) zO c ado) UN z0 > > (Xo °R y °E Q oc'`Fi Wm Wv f� c� Wa W wO U �;ma Lu0 E W yy�� 3 d m F n = r pa w o U m o d LL i N N =' w U m Q y L -0 m N N .O N :i C N Z m m a) C c Q C7 vl E -'' G E Q 3° rn aNi 0 `o m 0) Z F Q a a) a.: m WN a c > a)o z d= a°oEa- `c= Lu E� ° Q c G O m c 4 Z m t5 � °J - � O C7 ? j °? C 2 a2o > a ° o J 2Lm a) n LL wm c m z N $or E 0-2 or m i m m v°`) ap`') N m C ai c 2 �ci oow o w0 ° Em a- ' L .o a o O C c y Y m m ywN w. o M rn> m J O N -a- a� ) E J Om � N N = moN wo d 0 O N C O C a p M N C E > E o m Ea t: O � � -o� - p m m mU d L ' m c m- o E 3 m o LL w °NOS E y ad : a ° N N a - °- w o o c m m 'a o O a) L w o y !' O 2: o m" -° o c°) o Q) >, a d m E N c W =~ U N p m c C r y) O J >. C N O C a 3 m C >_ a m w a) O _ C O °. a C .0.. d L al m m A- C a) H O C O a 0 .L.. O E �` 'Op > O U C U a) >' o �. O .0. N H 0- a) a) a N U a T d L N> N m t1 a) d m a] f0 .2 C >` 07 X> N O C L N O a ` L r C m O a a ? a a C a) C N a1 O O d" a) 0 N C 3� o> m T M 0) m N� vo ` m° a O x m N� o 3 °° N N U d N a) .- N C V C :w N CL E a) > .0 C O `p p M U N a) y m C a) U a) O a U O N O C 0 N O N N m N o n1 N S] C O L a) p N 0.0 a s a d L_ C 1] O a) m N j .y m Em O y .N D 0 a) 0> C C e p O �S C C .O+ a, O T _ d C L O O O L a E M C d 0 N a y a C p E N U m L C T O p N L O O c> w c rnb.- c m N... c U T� E�c' E. d ~ E a :0 L C r M 0°) > U W N .Y C O M L t a1 L m E O a7 Q` U? 4 C N M N m w .3 >, _° O .o .y .o K@ J N N m °'t MC u 76 0 0 7 E C 'C C a- a) M O p`_ a N 0 E (n '0 0 0- O t0 `p n- -- o d U O a1 en o L a1 > c p N Y c W .r U �. a) N "' E U c N "' O W C W rL- N �. H w > a = N O «) p m C a C 'C ` D V= .N-. O .0 O C N N d a) O C '� N O N m m M N a1 =.92 u° p o E o c oo �, p `m p d o `o N N c c m N a) U W t0 0` U J. .- p i p a U E O n C a n... ° C N N C `O T O a =00 f0 O C E C M a 0 j 0 0 L O y a) d m t0 J d J C U C C d CL L L N a s U U U a) 0 N O U W❑ M T a w N N a u1 N d a) f0 V= i> > O N N U d V) c a c C O C O E O d o m a 0 c O m o - m o o `) .5 a N o c ° a ?s wC a- > 3 o ENm mm Ca B > a O `m m T2 0) - O N o 'm a) N a) O p C p N u M .0i o ME:' > Mvaa o m 0 m°- p E yE (D Q) u nc 0 O a O o 0 ) E a o x p N O a) L E N E a) E >.- ) + O C 0C ~ LLTj O O V U C M a) O> mE -'aS$E c�a; a�i�a `.�_°• 4) a) a) Ua-°i o y L as c oo mENO mmaa)) ac) a� °� yo° x d° c `off � m c� o° E a `o m m °o0 � v L� � 2 aa) E p m ° c E c c... N M N N N C N O E O C a) a) Q .p_, 3 O C '� of a1 n o C X )0 O C o_ '- O O N N O - 0 o V% C a7 O N U C m O C a N m U O a C 'O M 0) a) N 'O ¢ 0 m° ° C- m C o N w ` 2 0 U aa)) )D T m d .0 �0 U coy ca)QUyoo� p�NC CnmE °� N "O r m N 0 o > aE) a � 0 O H�Q N O N C t=/) C° U =° C L E° Ow La oc a m' ° a c N o�2 ¢oa up` - °E 0> N, L N K't �` m �_ N 0 N d N C d d y' C _O w a U W 10 N y 0 tU)a0 �° cc H 0,mom w m0 Oo0 U .E �o CD of oo `o m °°E 0Y(D Y Oaor K o OE U� d'o (7a Zc.N O_oc Klop 7 E Y M VpN Zm� >c 0.40 "C`o �' wE0 LL!avNic O .10.M c� Wac aM 6wwj6E °La E za) CE QQ~:Oy Oaaai0m Oca..°wEEE0 �o0au Ocmc Z °o Wok �N �c Z._o_�mn. CL OsE`°`° wLa°i� W Lu W W U U W n mK Kn> K`o Eo`O Ka 9Z C))02 Ir0 a) Kac)mw K d c O 16 w N N N m N= NU) d LL. U N d w 7 d 0 .t- 2 0 0 C ° oL U C U) O ° U O C O > C m C (D Z c 0 wLL c d d d �o m CD .0 o E C E 0 0) 0 d y d m -0 0 do CL Y y C E ieJ0 O O = U o d 3Y 2 N C m C o y E o E ° ° c m c 0 d a c d E O y0 n J 0 C m Q U > d ° m N � N -O 0° aE p L c .- d O� orn U) ox co o n 3 yt O n H E g� 0o WC N J O N O o.'m 0 c w m m a' of N '� j 0 c0 j W 2 Q ° W d na c - 0 € F v 0 W y m U) Na-Oi fgdavm NO af0iN�3 0 w N v O (0 O O ^ 0.- Y E E ° 7�j ,n o a) a N O L N O C U O O --0 a J � m C ° J fA 0cc3a N U_0 an y 0° C U O O N O V)U d y O N N d , . UH T O p T N C mr U) a�mo a 'C �w NL) 0 N C d d •C W d y d N N 2 0 C w � nnay'O w J d J m M m p d 0 Un? dc«oi m=Z q 'n N 0 . N d >m5 0 d N � n C O Nw TO) E N L d 0. 0 m CD « C N d EO 0 A e�ac> m N c o p O U m c' J U ja �$2 p N m y O c Y rn E LL m ° `m E d o€ E m v > N T m d o C 10 0)9 `m a W j c 0' 3 C Ua32m2 N C O t m C m O 3 O N d O w FF �« C C m N d 0 cu a) °C r •0 0 'c d m > m O U n °z n2 E` a c Tioo$o N U N �pp J 0-0 0 C U E U d w m o 0 C C y C d O "O c - E E d m L N N C O = O N O 3 J O` 0 m r n aEi c °o r -m > - d U 2 O ZaNE €mom O G �EOr'cmo � o E a p a N d c a' .r; N m •O '.0 d d O M C C ° N c d 0 EE E W U '- N H? w Z O c o ulw - doH - Z uE C O d N w N N N 0cc CL w C U N @ V) c m `7 m d N d � m T CD `d m V > N _c 0 N N m U V U c ax r d E U. = Y 0 d @ C N C w CO C d O N a CL c J°m c > a E CL c 7 m O. O d C � d 0 m Uy d � N Z N y dV C O V d o _U C Q C J N L � - N 7 fa c � o O m d N N ° O U ID N U O U aym N d Q � L � � 3 Q c O w U 2 LL O Xc Vl ,O U 2 - n C .0 U m LL � C O m �C LU m U n m O -0 n N E� d C m r O N C d m N �mn d m y U � d w N N O LL C G W 'm C � C J N U N `0 � 0 LL d d W U NU)'c� 2 cu E co N 3 c C C U d N d n.0 N O Q�UOa m d m y d tt- mT000 N £ 2 cm N d J n c M0 Co 7 y U a N O C L CD d N U 3 C C JO C N d m J N C O d ID 0 d 7 O J md- Q-D a� y d N LL W v = c H Uy d-0 O y Ja N N N W N J y 0 O U) V z � L Val m 0.2 y S C C L a U � r 3 �0p U w y -al F T J Q� LL a 7 O� C 0 7�o 0-0 y O E a U LL E H F c d y-0 ul K ƒ)f)$CD §0 0 E (]t\ U) 0- } \ \0- \ }\ \ \� 4 ®k »f§ 0CL -- k /) \ {ƒ 0. C) 0_217 G Ca 2£§-J& L) cc ) Z� {Fz > \\ Z 7a$(`; =e±®� / \§! §/� 2& \i2§\ }\ } \ } \ /!7)® §; .0 w ==22»=NNNZmm§mm@Q@@GG@ � `c -`{ -w ) ) )/ r )0 2E #§ { \2 §r $ 2\ 2\J! ! - ;) § -- Im t65 • _ \ S); ¥ ] §] Q % - ) ] 66 k )))] ))k// ) )\ M LL �U) \ §3){ § � � k co e *Bf 3 7ƒ`U) fu0 )\ z\#� 2 35 ■ §!)5 �§ U U) ` *` 3< ul K ƒ)f)$CD §0 0 E (]t\ U) 0- } \ \0- \ }\ \ \� 4 ®k »f§ 0CL -- k /) \ {ƒ 0. C) 0_217 G Ca 2£§-J& L) cc ) Z� {Fz > \\ Z 7a$(`; =e±®� / \§! §/� 2& \i2§\ }\ } \ \ /!7)® §; w ==22»=NNNZmm§mm@Q@@GG@ -`{ -w e ® t;; )/ )0 2E #§ $fr §r 2\ 2\J! - ;) § i#/ $ S); j \ \\/ K) { ■ ! - r =w = =a =22;» Mu /$ /§ /mCD0 M)§) /§ / \ /§) §( ������aammm u }\ } \ \ /!7)® §; -`{ -w e ® t;; )/ )0 2E #§ $fr §r 2\ 2\J! - ;) § i#/ $ S); j \ \\/ K) { COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL IMPACT FEE UPDATE FINAL REPORT Prepared for: COLLIER COUNTY and DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY April 26, 2005 Prepared by: Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida, 33602 ph (813) 224 -8862, far (813) 226 -2106 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.........«.......»..»......»...»......» ..............................»_.. .........» »......... ».... »..... 1 Legal Basis 1 Dual Rational Nexus Test ...................................... ............................... _.... - -... _.. 2 School Impact Fees in Florida — the Case Law......... ..... .................... ............... ...... 2 4 Population.. ». . » .. _ »»... ...» » ... » » ...» ..... 5 Level of Service ... »» ... ..._ . » » . »....» » .... . »...... ». » _.._ 5 Cost Component . »»_» .» ... _ ..»» ........ » » . „... . 6 Facility Cost per Student Station . .... .. ...................................................... .......... ..... 6 Facility Planning, Construction, and FF &E Costs .......... ............................... 6 LandCosts ...................................................................... ............................... 7 Net Interest Carrying Costs.. .............. — .... ... — ........ - .................................... 8 Weighted Facility Impact Cost per Student ..................... ............................ 8 Total Facility Impact Cost per Student .... ............. ....... ...................................... .... 9 TransportationCosts ....................................................... ............................... 9 Ancillary/Administrative Facility Costs ......................... ............................... 10 Credit Component . .. „... ». » »__... » . ».. _ _.. 11 StateRevenue Credit ................................................................ ............................... 12 Capital Improvement Revenue Tax ......................................... ............................... 13 Net Impact Cost per Student w. _ ..___ 16 Student Generation Rates _... »»» .. _ ._.._.._.. _ ..... 16 Proposed School Impact Fee Schedule _. 17 Indexing _ » ... _ ....» . .._.. . 18 BuildingCost ........................................................................... ............................... 18 LandCost ................................................................................. ............................... 19 EquipmentCost ........................................................................ ............................... 20 Application... ................................................... ....... ....... ................................. ....... .. 20 Tisdale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 i School Impact Fee Update Study LIST OF TABLES: Table 1: Level of Service... .......................................................... ....... ..................... 6 Table 2: School Facility Cost per Student Station ............................ ............................... 7 Table 3: Weighted Facility Impact Cost per Student ....................................................... 9 Table 4: Facility Impact Cost per Study ................... ............................................... ...... I I Table 5: State Revenue Credit .............................. -- ...................... ................................ 13 Table 6: Annual CIT Available per Student ..... ...................................... ....................... 14 Table 7: Annual CIT Credit per Student ....................................... ............ ..................... 15 Table 8: Net Impact Cost per Student .......................................... ................................... 16 Table 9: Student Generation Rates ... ...... ................. . .................................................... 17 Table 10: Proposed School Impact Fee Schedule ............................. ............................... 18 Table 11: Building Cost Index.. ......................... ............ ............... ....... — ................... 19 Table 12: Collier County Property Market Values ......... ............................... ........... 19 Table 13: Equipment Cost Index ..................................................................................... 20 Table 14: Distribution of Capital Cost ..................... ................. ..................................... 21 Appendices Appendix A - District School Board of Collier County Facility Inventory Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 ii School Impact Fee Update Study Collier County School Impact Fee Update Study Introduction Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) was retained by Collier County to conduct an update of the County's existing school impact fee program School impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of public education facilities, land, and equipment required to support the additional demand for new school facilities created by new growth. This report presents the results of the School Impact Fee Study prepared for the County and will serve as the technical support document for the updated school impact fee. There are several major elements associated with the update of the school impact fee. These include: • Legal Basis • Inventory • Population • Level of Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Impact Cost per Student • Student Generation Rate • Proposed School Impact Fee Schedule • Indexing These ten elements are summarized in the remainder of this report, with the insult being the net impact cost for new residential development in Collier County. It should be noted that school impact fees are charged only to residential land uses, as reflected in the proposed impact fee schedule. Legal Basis In order to perform the necessary functions of government, local governments must constantly expand the inventory of government facilities and lands needed to provide essential governmental services, including schools. As local governments grow, so too does the demand and cumulative costs of new capital facilities. The authority for Florida Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 1 School Impact Fee Update Study counties to adopt and collect impact fees in order to address these "growth - necessitated" costs is well- established St. Johns County v. Northeast Florida Builders Association, 583 So. 2d 635, 638 (Fla. 1991) (`°The use of impact fees has become an accepted method of paying for public improvements that must be constructed to serve new growth.') (citing Home Builders & Contractors Ass'n. v. Palm Beach Cry., 446 So.2d 140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Hollywood, Inc. Y. Broward County, 431 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)). The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act specifically "encourage[s] the use of innovative land development regulations which include provisions such as ... impact fees.. ". See §163.3202(3), Fla. Stat.; see also Home Builders & Contractors Ass'n., 446 So.2d 140. Furthermore, in the 1991 case of St. Johns County v. Northeast Florida Builders Ass'n, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the authority of Florida counties to impose impact fees for school facilities. 583 So. 2d at 642. Dual Rational Nems Teat Although the fees at issue were described as "user fees," the case of Contractors & Builders Ass'n of Pinellas County v. Dunedin provided the initial guidance as to what constitutes a defensible "impact fee" under Florida law. 329 So.2d 314 (Fla 1976). In Dunedin, the Florida Supreme Court found, first, that "the cost of new facilities should be borne by new users to the extent new use requires new facilities, but only to that extent." Id. at 321. Fifteen years later, the Florida Supreme Court once again took up the issue of impact fees in the first of two major school impact fee cases it has decided, and expressly set forth the "dual rational nexus test" as the constitutional standard against which impact fees would be imposed in Florida 583 So.2d at 637. The Court stated the test as follows: "... the local government must demonstrate a reasonable connection, or rational nexus, between the need for additional capital facilities and the growth in population generated by the subdivision. In addition, the government must show a reasonable connection, or rational nexus, between the expenditures of the funds collected and the benefits accruing to the subdivision," Id at 637 (emphasis added) (quoting Hollywood, Inc. 431 So. 2d at 611 -12). St. Johns County and the subsequent case of Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla 2000) have resolved many questions related to how school impact fee programs, specifically, should be structured so as to ensure compliance with the dual rational nexus test. In St. Johns County, upon the school board's request, the county had prepared a methodology report recommending a school impact fee, based on adopted level of service Tmdale•Otiver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 2 School Impact Fee Update Study standards and cost factors, which assigned to new residential development its fairshare of the costs of new capital school facilities. 583 So. 2d at 637. Payment of the fees was a condition of building permit issuance and all school impact fee revenues were to be earmarked by the school board "solely to `acquire, construct, expand, and equip the educational sites and educational capital facilities necessitated by new development. "' Id. Impact fee revenues not spent within six years of their collection would be returned and developers who dedicated or constructed school facilities would receive a "developer credit" against impact fees owed. However, the county's impact fee ordinance provided that it would be applicable in both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county, except that it would not be effective within the municipalities until the municipality had entered into an interlocal agreement with the county to collect the fees. The Court fast addressed the "needs" prong of the dual rational test. The county's fees assumed .44 students would be generated per household. Id. at 638. The builders pointed out that some new households would not have children and would not impact the public school system at all. Therefore, since there was no sufficient "need" being created by every unit being assessed the fee, the county's impact fee amounted to an unauthorized tax Id. The Court rejected this argument, pointing out that since the county and school board were required "to provide additional facilities so as to be in a position to serve each dwelling unit" the county had sufficiently demonstrated that new development created a "need" for new schools. Id. 639. The Court found the second prong of the dual rational nexus test "more troublesome." Id. at 639. First, the Court recognized that the law did not require that every unit of development benefit from impact fee expenditures, but that it was enough that new schools were available to serve that unit. However, the county's impact fees were not being collected within municipalities that had not agreed to participate and yet the impact fee ordinance did not prohibit the expenditure of impact fee revenues to accommodate the impacts of development within the municipalities, which were not required to pay the fee. Id. Since there were no restrictions that would ensure that the fees were spent to benefit those who paid them (i.e., new residents of only the unincorporated areas), the Court held that the county's fee failed the second benefit prong of the dual rational nexus test and enjoined the collection of school impact fees until "substantially all of the population of St. Johns County is subject to the ordinance." Id. However, the Court rejected the argument that imposition of an impact fee violated the constitutional "uniformity" requirement simply because St. Johns County used impact fees and other school districts or counties did not. Id. 641. The court found that the "Florida Constitution only requires that a system be provided that gives every student an Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 3 School Impact Fee Update Study equal chance to achieve basic educational goals prescribed by the legislature. The constitutional mandate is not that every school district in the state must receive equal funding nor that each educational program must be equivalent." Id In Volusia County, the Florida Supreme Court once again took up the issue of school impact fees, this time addressing the appropriateness of imposing impact fees against land uses that neither impacted nor benefited from public schools. 760 So. 2d 126. The challenger owned a mobile home park in Ormond Beach that was subject to the county's school impact fee ordinance. The mobile park, however, was deed restricted to residents over the age of 18. Id at 128 (also noting that the park's minimum age requirements complied with the "housing for older persons" exemption of the Federal Fair Housing Act). The Court found that, due to the 30 -year deed restrictions against school age children, the essential character of this land use was one that necessarily would not generate any students. Id. at 136. The county argued the need for new schools created by and benefiting new development countywide was sufficient to meet the dual rational test regardless of whether this particular land use created a significant demand on schools. The Court disagreed, however, and concluded that since the mobile home park would not generate students it would not benefit from the construction of new schools and therefore it could not be required to pay a school impact fee. Id. at 137. In order to demonstrate compliance with the dual rational nexus test, Collier County has had prepared this methodological study, which recommends a fee schedule by proposed residential land use. That schedule will be implemented countywide through the County's existing Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, which provides for the collection, accounting, and expenditure of impact fees so as to ensure a "substantial benefit" to new residential developmant that pays the school impact foes. Inventory There are 44 public schools that currently serve the students and residents of Collier County and its municipalities, including 27 elementary schools, nine middle schools, and eight high schools that are operated by the District School Board of Collier County ( DSBCC). It should be noted that the DSBCC also operates three workforce education facilities, l l alternative schools/programs, as well as five administrative and support facilities. In addition, during the CIP Period, the District will build 11 new traditional schools. & Associates, Inc. April 2006 4 School Impact Fee Update To ensure that the impact fee initially reflects only classroom space for grades pre - Idndergarten through twelve, adult and alternative learning facilities are not included in the cost calculations. Should new growth result in a pressing need for more non- traditional school facilities, such facilities could be included in subsequent updates of the school impact fee. It should be noted that the District owns 515 acres of vacant land. To provide a more conservative estimate, the value of vacant land is not included in the inventory and impact fee calculations either. Population Collier County's public schools provide services to the entire county. Attendance boundaries for individual schools can be redrawn in order to balance school enrollment where students live with where there is available school capacity. Further, school capacity that is added in one location can serve new development in another part of the county. Therefore, the appropriate impact fee district for public education facilities is countywide. Level of Service Based on the information provided by the DSBCC, the level of service (LOS) for public schools is 137.5 square feet per student station for elementary schools, 150.8 square feet for middle schools, and 160.7 square feet for high schools. The weighted average LOS for all public schools is 146.9 square feet per student station The DSBCC's current inventory of school facilities includes permanent square feet and Permanent student stations for both existing schools, as well as schools planned to be built in the next five years, according to the DSBCC's adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY 2007 -2026. As a result, the LOS is based on the DSBCC's inventory of permanent school facilities planned through the 2010/11 school year. Since the future five -year inventory is used based on planned facilities included in the CIP, subsequent calculations include the projected student enrollment for the 2010/11 school year. Table 1 presents the LOS calculations for each school type, as well as for the weighted average LOS for all schools. A detailed list of schools included in the inventory is presented in Appendix A. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 5 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 7 Level of Service(l) (1) Source: DSBCC (2) LOS based on permanent square footage and student stations that will be available for the future five yew period (2010 /11 school year). Cost Component In determining the cost of providing public schools to Collier County residents, the first step is to calculate the facility cost per student station. Several cost components must be considered when calculating the total cost of constructing a school. These cost components include planning costs, construction costs, furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF &E) costs, the cost of land, and net interest carrying costs, The weighted average facility cost for each of type of school is developed based on these cost components, which are described in more detail in the following sections. 4 �, ti In order to determine the costs associated with the planning, construction, and FF &E for each school type, cost information contained in the DSBCC's current CIP is used. Cost information in the currant CIP is escalated each year, based on the construction schedule outlined in the CIP. In order to ensure that cost information used to calculate the facility planning, construction, and FF&E costs per student station from the CIP are in current dollars, only the costs for schools for which conduction is planned to begin in 2006 are used As shown in Table 2, the facility planning, construction, and FF &E costs are $18, $253, and $25 per square foot, respectively. These costs are constant and are not dependent on the type of school being constructed. _ Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 6 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 2 School Facility Cost per Student Station (2) DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -2026. Costs are in 2006 dollars. (3) Based on the total land replacement value of $202,051 per acre, divided by the average (typical) square footage for each school type. Land value is derived from programmed land purchases in the CIP in 2006 dollars. (4) The net interest carrying cost per facility is the bond interest costs during the construction period that the DSBCC incurs in order to construct a new school facility. (5) The total construction cost per facility is the sum of the school facility cost components (Items 2-4). (6) The facility cost per student station is the total facility cost per square foot (Item 5) multiplied by the square feet per student station for each respective school type and the weighted average (Item 1). Land Costs The cost of land for each school facility also must be added to the total facility cost. To determine the cost of land for school facilities, a weighted average cost per acre of $202,051 is used. This figure is based on land to be purchased over the next five years by DSBCC, as programmed in the current CIP. This cost per acre figure is in 2006 dollars and includes the cost to purchase the land, as well as other associated costs, including appraisals, boundary surveys, feasibility studies, consistency review with County, Phase II Environmental Studies, and species mitigation, when applicable. It should be noted that it is the DSBCC's practice to purchase large quantities of vacant land when available and to have a `land bank" available for future school sites. In order to be conservative, the land costs included in the analysis do not include excess vacant land the DSBCC currently owns. The land cost for each school type is determined by multiplying the number of acres per 1,000 square feet for each school type by the cost per acre of $202,051. The acreage per Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 7 School Impact Fee Update Study 1,000 square feet is calculated dividing the average number of acres to be purchased for new schools, 25 acres per elementary school, 35 acres per middle school, and 50 acres per high school, by the square footage of new schools programmed in the CIP. As shown in Table 2, the land cost per square foot of building ranges from $35 to $43 per square foot, with an overall weighted average cost of $41 per square foot. Mr-MVY1 In addition to the costs identified above, the interest expense or lost opportunity on fiords that the DSBCC uses during construction of a new school facility must be considered. According to the DSBCC staff, it takes two years from start to finish to construct an elementary school, two and one -half years to construct a riddle school, and three years to construct a high school. These life cycle time frames include the planning and bidding process, construction, and the acquisition of FF &E. As previously mentioned, it is DSBCC's practice to purchase additional land when possible. As a result, land is typically acquired prior to the construction of a new school facility and therefore is not included in the planning and construction timeframes mentioned above. Based on historical and current financing trends, the DSBCC bonds the majority of new school construction. Therefore, it is appropriate to charge new development for the carrying cost per facility (which is the bond interest rate during the construction period) that the DSBCC incurs in order to construct new school facilities. This net interest carrying cost is added to the total cost per facility in Table 2, which includes all cost components previously discussed. The total cost per square foot for each school type is then multiplied by the LOS to determine the cost per student station for each school type, as well as the weighted average cost per student station of $ $19. Welatited Facility Impact Cost Der Studept The calculation of the total impact cost per student is based on the facility cost per student station figures derived in Table 2 and is calculated using the distribution of projected student enrollment to available capacity for the 2010/11 school year. This calculation also adjusts the cost per student based on the available capacity in five years. As previously mentioned, the future five -year projected enrollment is used because the LOS is calculated based on the future five-year inventory of public schools. As previously mentioned, the weighted average total facility impact cost per student station is adjusted by dividing the facility cost per student station by the ratio of projected students to projected capacity for each school type. This calculation adjusts the cost per Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 8 School Impact Fee Update Study student station to a cost per student, and also adjusts the cost based on the amount of available capacity. If there is expected to be excess capacity (e.g., more student stations than expected students in five years), then the cost per student increases. Similarly, if there is expected to be more students enrolled than available capacity, the cost per student station is adjusted down. In the case of Collier County elementary schools, there is projected to be more students than available capacity, based on the projected student enrollment and number of student stations expected to be available in the next five years. For middle and high schools, the opposite is true, as there is projected to be excess capacity. As shown in Table 3, the result is the weighted facility impact cost of $52,148 per student. Table 3 Weighted Facility Impact Cost per Student (1) Source: Table 2 (2) Source: Table] (3) Source: DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -2026 _�1 1 The total facility cost per student includes two additional cost components that are used to determine the total impact cost per student for public schools in Collier County. These cost components include the cost of providing transportation and the cost of ancillary support facilities. Both of these additional cost components are discussed in further detail below. The first additional cost component is the cost of providing transportation to students. According to information provided by the DSBCC staff, the current capital cost of all vehicles used to provide transportation for students and support the District's operations is $42.9 million. This is based on a replacement cost of $94,233 for each of the 405 school buses and $21,109 for each of the 224 support vehicles owned by DSBCC. The Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 9 School Impact Fee Update Study 9 Fkffl l.p,d I:OY.p' Modem FACft Cud pw Smdud Sbtiat"l 548,437 S54,406 556,412 5522274 SWM 1Q2010/II School Y,,'-' 26,1, 11,032 l4, 51,732 PmJpcWStude r201d11 3dwdY=01 27,7231 10,5581 13,5761 51,857 W A n,W cbw am'�A 1 S4S,uf 1 M"9 Ssf,425 I SnJ48 (1) Source: Table 2 (2) Source: Table] (3) Source: DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -2026 _�1 1 The total facility cost per student includes two additional cost components that are used to determine the total impact cost per student for public schools in Collier County. These cost components include the cost of providing transportation and the cost of ancillary support facilities. Both of these additional cost components are discussed in further detail below. The first additional cost component is the cost of providing transportation to students. According to information provided by the DSBCC staff, the current capital cost of all vehicles used to provide transportation for students and support the District's operations is $42.9 million. This is based on a replacement cost of $94,233 for each of the 405 school buses and $21,109 for each of the 224 support vehicles owned by DSBCC. The Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 9 School Impact Fee Update Study total capital cost is then divided by the current enrollment, resulting in a cost of $988 per student. Ancillary /Administrative Facility Costs The second additional cost component is the capital cost of ancillary and administrative facilities that are necessary for the DSBCC to provide support services for students, schools, transportation services, and administrative personnel. The DSBCC currently has 76,000 square feet of ancillary facilities for maintenance and operations and 125,000 square feet for administrative and office space. The estimated replacement cost of $180 per square foot for muntenance/operatiens was originally provided by DSBCC staff. However, based on costs for similar buildings contained in recent impact fee studies and the advice of legal counsel, a replacement cost of $150 per square foot for maintenance/operations space is used. In addition, a cost of $233 per square foot for administrative/office space is used, based on the cost to build the Dr. MLK Jr. Administration Center inflated to 2006 dollars. The resulting cost for ancillary and administrative facilities is $931 per student. These two cost components are added to the weighted facility impact cost per student from Table 3, resulting in a total impact cost of $54,067 per student, as presented in Table 4. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier C April 2006 10 School Impact Fee Update Table 4 Facility Impact Cost per Student Weighted Averalle Total Fadlity Impao Coat per Studenton $52 ,1 Trampoirtafion Services Coat W Student Total CWW Cost OfTransportation Services (,) $42,892$0 Current Emoliment(') 43,414 Cost o fTransportafton Services per S7adent $988 Facilities Cost per Student Total Square Feet of Mamtenanow0perations Ancillary Facilitws(3) 75,596 Cost per Square Foot for Mandenao 'ons Ancillary Facilities() $150.00 Total Cost o Awr 1k zry Faci fiti es gaintau nceloperar, ons Fact hlties $11,339,400 Total Feet of Office/Admin Ancillary Facilities(') 124,881 Cost per Square Foot for Offrce/Admin Ancillary Facilities(6) $233,00 Total Cast o Anill Facilities ce/Ata;nin Facilih'es $29,097273 Total Cost o AllAncil! Facilthes $40,436,673 Current Student Emvftcntoi 43,414 Cost o Anil Facilities per Shaient $931 TOW Impact 099 p SWdmtr'v 1 $54,067 (1) Source: Table 3 (2) Source: Student Transportation Services, DSBCC (3) Source: The estimate of $180 per square foot provided by DSBCC is reduced to $150 per square foot based on ancillary facility cost in other jurisdictions. (4) Based on the cost per square foot to construct the MLK Jr. Administration Center, which is inflated to 2006 dollars using the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index. (5) The sum of the weighted total facility impact cost per student (Item 1), the cost of transportation services per student, and the cost of ancillary facilities per student. Credit Component in addition to the school impact fee program, other revenues that new development generates that are used towards capital expansion of school facilities must be considered in the credit component of the school impact fee. In order to ensure that new residential development is not being overcharged for the capital cost of new public schools, a credit is given for any additional revenue, other than impact fees, that new development generates and that is used for the capital expansion of school facilities. This ensures that each new residential development pays the appropriately calculated impact fee, less any additional revenue included as part of the impact fee credit. A credit for school impact Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 11 School Impact Fee Update Study fees is not given for revenue generated by new development that is used for capital maintenance of existing education facilities or for maintenance or operation costs. The following state and local sources of revenues will be considered in developing impact fee credits. • Public Education Capital Outlay • State Class Size Reduction • Local Capital Improvement Tax The Florida State Constitution authorizes sources of revenue for school districts, including Public Education Capital Outlay (DECO) and Class Size Reduction revenue. Revenues from PECO are generated through a 2.5- percent tax imposed on the gross receipts of sellers of electricity, natural or manufactured gas, and telecommunication services in the State. Revenue generated from this tax is used to fiord capital renovation and expansion projects for public education facilities. Class Size Reduction revenue is provided by the State to build additional student stations in accordance with the Class Size Amendment. The total available state revenue is listed in Table 5. The calculation for determining the state revenue credit per student is threefold First, the total projected state revenue available over the next five years for the expansion of student stations is $19.1 million, based on a review of the DSBCC's five -year budget. The five -year total state revenue available for capital projects is divided by the average student enrollment over the same five -year period to determine the state revenue amount of $403 per student, or an annual amount of $81 per student. Second, the present value of this amount is calculated using an interest rate of 5 percent over a 25 -year time period, the average life expectancy of a school facility. This results in a present value credit of $1,142 per student. The final step includes a review of the amount of available revenue that will be used for capacity expansion of school facilities. According to a review of the DSBCC's five -year budget, this percentage is approximately 43 percent. Therefore, the present value of annual state revenue per student is reduced by this percentage to determine the amount of state revenue that is expected to be applied to capital expansion, resulting in a net state revenue credit of $491 per student. Tinlale -Olive & Associates, lnc. Collin County April 2006 12 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 5 State Revenue Credit PECO -New Construction"' $7,309,094 Class Size Reduction") ULW2,9L3 Total State Revenues $19113,027 Average Emollment0l 47,435 State Revenue Per Staden& $403 AverageAnnu al Revenue per .StudeatO $01 'Capitalization Rate 5.0001t Capitalization Period, Years 25 Present Value of Annual State Revenue Creditt5) $1,142 Percent of Capital Funding Available for Capacity Expansion61 43% Net State Revenue Croft per StudenO 5491 (1) Source: DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -2026 (2) Source: DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -2026 (3) Total state revenue divided by average enrollment for five -year period (Item 2). (4) State revenue per student (Item 3) divided by five years. (5) Present value of average annual revenue per student (Item 4) at 5 percent interest over a 25- year capitalization period. (6) Source: DSBCC Five -Year Budget (7) Present value of annual state revenue credit (Item 5) multiplied by the percent of capital funding available for capacity expansion (Item 6). Capital Improvement Tax Revenue Credit The School District has the authority to levy up to 2 -mills of the countywide ad valorem tax to generate revenue for education. This revenue, referred to as Capital Improvement Tax (CI9), is used for both capital renovation and capital expansion. The calculation to determine the CIT revenue to be used for capital expansion, as well as the resulting revenue credit per student is a four step process. The first three steps are presented in Table 6. First, the total 2006 taxable value for all residential land uses is determined, based on information provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser. This total is then divided by the 2006 enrollment to detemtine the average taxable value per student. Second, the annual tax payment per student is calculated. The average taxable value per student is divided by 1,000 and then multiplied by $2 (the amount taxed for 2 -mills per $1,000 of taxable value). This amount is then increased by 57 percent, which is the increase in the taxable value of a new home over the average taxable value for existing Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 13 School Impact Fee Update Study homes in Collier County. This step ensures that new homes receive the proper credit since they will be assessed at a higher value over existing homes. Similar to the state revenue credit, the third step apportions the annual CIT per student by the percent of capital funding available for capacity expansion to determine the annual CIT revenue available for capacity per student. Table 6 Annual CIT Available for Capacity Collier County School Enrollment - 2006 (2) 43,414 Average Taxable Value per Stude to) $1,217,070 Capital Millage Rate $1000r $2 Annual Tax Payments per Stude P $3,822 Percent ofCapital Funding Available for Capacity Expansion(6) 43% Annual CIT Payments for Capacity per Studentm 1 $1,643 (1) Source: Collier County Property Appraiser (2) Source: Table 4 (3) Total Residential Taxable Value (Item 1) divided by the 2006 enrollment (Item 2). (4) The DSBCC is entitled to levy 2 -mills at a rate of I -mill per $1,000 of taxable value. (5) The average taxable value per student (Item 3) divided by 1,000 to determine the taxable value per student per $1,000. This amount is then multiplied by the capital millage rate for 2-mills (Item 4) and then increased by 37 percent, which is the difference between the taxable value of an existing home versus a new home in Collier County. (6) Source: Table 5 (7) Annual tax payment per student (Item 5) multiplied by the percent of capital finding available for capacity expansion (Item 6). The fourth step in calculating the CIT revenue credit per student is presented in Table 7, which determines the present value of the current annual Cif per student. The annual increase in home values is estimated at 2.5 percent due to homestead exemption law. According to State law, the increase in taxable value of homes is capped at 3 percent or at the Consumer Price Index (CPI), whichever is lower. Although the average CP1 over the past ten years has been 2.1 percent (see Table 13), a 2.5- parceit annual increase is applied to provide a conservative approach. The resulting figures are brought back to present value using a 5 percent discount rate and a 25 -year capitalization period. The result is a compounded total present value credit of $29,726 per student. Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 14 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 7 Annual CIT Credit per Student 4'�jf �a4 i g4 1 $1643 $1,565 2 $1,6941 $1,527 3 $1,7261 $1,491 4 $1,7691 $1455 5 $1,9131 $1,421 6 $1,9581 $1,386 7 $1,9041 $1353 8 $1,9521 $1321 9 $2,001 $1,290 10 $2,051 $1,259 11 $2,102 $1,229 12 $2,155 $1,200 13 $2209 $1,171 14 $2,264 $1143 15 $2,3211 $1,116 16 $2,379 $1,090 17 $2,438 $1,064 18 $2,499 $1,038 19 $2,561 $1,013 20 $2,625 $989 21 $2,691 $966 22 $2,758 $943 23 $2,82 $920 24 $2,89 8 $899 25 $2,97 $877 Totaf, $29,726 Annual increaset31 2.5% Interest rate 1 5% lCapitalizotion Period 25 (1) Source: Table 6 for Year 1(2006) CIT per Student (2) Total of annual present value credits (Item 1) at 5 percent interest over a 23 year capitalization period- (3) Average annual increase in taxable value. Tindale- Olivet & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 15 School Impact Fee Update Study Net Impact Cost per Student Table 8 provides a summary of the three revenue credits discussed previously, with the result being the net impact cost per student of $23,850. Table 8 Net Impact Cost per Student (4) Source: Table 4 (5) Source: Table 5 (6) Source: Table 7 (7) Sum of state revenue credit (Item 2) and CTf revenue credit (Item 3). (8) Total impact cost per student (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per student (Item 4). Student Generation Rates The number of students living in a household varies depending on the type of residential housing. Therefore, school impact fees are often assessed based on the student generation rates of specific residential use types. For Collier County, the student generation rate per residential trait is based on three types of residential uses: single family, multi- family, and mobile home. In addition, the single family land use is broken out into three tiers based on the square footage. The student generates rates are derived using Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) and Census 2000 data The student generation rate for the single family land use is tiered using persons per housing unit data from the 2003 American Housing Survey and is adjusted based on the ratio of the national persons per household to Collier County. Finally, the number of students obtained from the 2000 Census was compared with the number of students enrolled in 2000. It was found that the actual enrollment was approximately 2 percent lower than estimates obtained using PUMS. Therefore, the student generation rates were adjusted downward by 2 percent. Tindale -0 liver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 16 School Impact Fee Update Study The student generation rate, or number of students per unit figure, is developed by dividing the number of students within a particular residential use type by the total number of units of that land use in Collier County. The student generation rates by residential use type are provided in Table 9. Table 9 Student Generation Rates r Z �.. 1 _ 1 A t t I � 1• 1� _ t •. •t tt 1 1 -��� � ' (1) Students per unit derived using data from Census 2000 and Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS). The student generation rate for a single family unit is tiered using data from Census 2000 and the 2003 American Housing Survey (AHS). (2) The ratio of total enrolled students to total students estimated from PUMS 2000 is 0.98. This ratio is applied to the students per unit to calculate the adjusted students per unit. Proposed School Impact Fee Schedule To determine the proposed school impact fee for each residential land use, the net impact cost per student, from Table 8, is multiplied by the student generation rate for each residential use, from Table 9. The resulting net impact fees are presented in the proposed impact fee schedule in Table 10. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 17 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 10 Proposed School Impact Fee Schedule (1) Source: Table 8 (2) Source: Table 9 (3) Net impact cost per unit is the product of the net impact cost per student (Item 1) and the number of students per unit (Item 2) for each residential land use category. Indexing In many cases, impact fees are reviewed periodically (every three to five years, etc.) as opposed to an annual basis. If no adjustment to the impact fee schedule is made during this period a situation can be created where major adjustments to the impact fee schedule become likely to be required due to the time between the adjustments. The need for significant adjustments also creates major concerns in the development community. To address this issue, it is recommended that the Collier County School Impact Fee be indexed for construction and land cost increases on an annual basis. Building Cost The cost of school buildings should be indexed in a fixed amount each year based on the building cost index provided by the Engineering News - Record (ENR). As presented in Table 11, over the past five years, the average increase in building cost has been 4.2 percent. Given the recent construction cost increases, utilization of a 5 -year average is recommended. In addition, the ENR index does not appear to capture local construction cost increases. The County may consider conducting a separate study to determine the changes in the local construction cost to be used for indexing purposes for the next few years. In the absence of such a study, the above index provides a conservative estimate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier Cotnty April 2006 18 School Impact Fee Update Study Single Famil < 1,500 KAWe feet du $23830 0.345 $8,228 1,500 - 2,499 square feet du $23,850 0.386 $9,206 >2,500 feet du $23,950 0.420 $10,017 Multi-Family du $-2318--50- 0.I20 $2,862 Mobile Home du $23,850 0.2401 $5,724 (1) Source: Table 8 (2) Source: Table 9 (3) Net impact cost per unit is the product of the net impact cost per student (Item 1) and the number of students per unit (Item 2) for each residential land use category. Indexing In many cases, impact fees are reviewed periodically (every three to five years, etc.) as opposed to an annual basis. If no adjustment to the impact fee schedule is made during this period a situation can be created where major adjustments to the impact fee schedule become likely to be required due to the time between the adjustments. The need for significant adjustments also creates major concerns in the development community. To address this issue, it is recommended that the Collier County School Impact Fee be indexed for construction and land cost increases on an annual basis. Building Cost The cost of school buildings should be indexed in a fixed amount each year based on the building cost index provided by the Engineering News - Record (ENR). As presented in Table 11, over the past five years, the average increase in building cost has been 4.2 percent. Given the recent construction cost increases, utilization of a 5 -year average is recommended. In addition, the ENR index does not appear to capture local construction cost increases. The County may consider conducting a separate study to determine the changes in the local construction cost to be used for indexing purposes for the next few years. In the absence of such a study, the above index provides a conservative estimate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier Cotnty April 2006 18 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 11 Building Cost Index") 2003 Land Cost 3574 � :r adex A ten -year trend for market values of countywide land (including buildings and structures) is evaluated to determine the historical change in land values. This analysis suggests an average annual growth rate of 15.4 percent be used, as presented in Table 12. A ten -year average is used to reduce the effects of temporary fluctuations in the market. Table 12 Collier County Property Market Values x �t jr4 �i 1996 � $21 751 280 40 N f N/A 1997 $23 436 330 45 7.7% 1998 $25 777 151470 10.0% 1999 $29 830 939 07 15.7% 2000 $33,902,799,963 13.6% 2001 $41,333,321,441 21.9% 2002 $49 671 844,946 20.2% 2003 $57,761717617 16.3% 2004 $64,236,986,518 11.2% 2005 $78 1,235 21.8% .AyMW 1 15.4% (1) Source: Property Appraiser, Collier County Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 19 School Impact Fee Update Study Eauloareat Cost The cost of fiuniture, equipment, school buses, and other support vehicles should be indexed in a fixed amount each year based on the consumer price index provided by the Bureau of Labor Economics. As presented in Table 13, over the past ten years, the average increase in building cost has been 2.1 percent. Table 13 Equipment Cost Index' Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPI It may be useful to illustrate how these indices can be applied. As presented in Table 14, of the $2.6 billion total school capital value, approximately 79 percent is for the buildings, 12 percent for the land, and 9 percent is for equipment (FF &E, buses, and vehicles). Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 20 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 14 Distribution of Capital Cost (I) Total square feet of inventory (fry Table 1) multiplied by the per square foot for planning and construction, land, and FF &E. buses/vehicles from Table 4. (2) Percentage of each component out of the total value. ad average cost cost of Applying these percentages to the average cost increases presented previously would provide a combined index of 5.3 percent [(4,2 x 0.791) + (15.4 x 0.119) + (2.1 x 0.089) _ 5.3], which then can be applied to all fees presented previously in Table 10. For example, using this index, the fee for the single family residential land use with 1,500 to 2,499 square feet would increase from $9,206 to $9,694 [($9,206) * (1 +0.053) _ $9,6941 at the end of the first year. Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 21 School Impact Fee Update Study Appendix A District School Board of Collier County Facility Inventory Table A -1 DSBCC Facility Inventory Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier Cota ty April 2006 A -1 School Impact Fee Update Study I vakn 1968 77,622 la Avalon - AddiCm 2009 14,816 2 1986 100.555 2s -Addtm 2007 27643 3 2002 85,785 3a - Additm 2008 11,116 4 FgB. 1998 113,207 4a Addeim 2010 1"51 85Ss dition 2008 11,116 6 1973 79,542 7 Tenaoe 1968 96.895 8 aada 1965 73,219 8• - Addmon 2007 26.048 91doe Pak 1969 79,475 10 1909 125,279 1IN Lake TnRotd - Addmoo 2007 3,472 11 I Oak 1992 104,288 12 1989 127,284 13 Maoslx 1993 93,074 14 Pack 1973 90,727 15 2002 86,880 I6 afica Math 1962 125,973 17 1973 73,172 17 - Additim 2007 34780 18 1973 93.9981 19 ehal Palm 2003 86,040 193 Palm -Addibm 2010 11,116 20 Gate 1964 69,150 20s (lOe- Addition 2007 33436 21 hadow4wo 1959 81475 21a -Addition 2008 8,055 22 o®ie nv6eld 1971 359 ammie BuSdd- Additim 2008 19 61 231r Oa►a 1986 93,288 23s Oaks- Addition 2007 10.764 2 v 1989 123763 25 Caaa 1948 43.0191 26 Gate hYamediae 2003 63.932 2 Terrace Ialetoeditle 2003 71,994 ew G 2007 11 8k,797 ew H 2011 I1 8,797 Naw I°I 2006 11 000 ew I 2007 11&797 ew K 2007 I ew L 2008 11 9,797 ew M 2007 11 &797 aw O 2011 118,797 aW- 9cYoo1 3.SB0,196 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier Cota ty April 2006 A -1 School Impact Fee Update Study Table A -1 (continued) DSBCC Facility Inventory I 1 7[NojlhNaples 2003 149 997 8 1 Oalaidge 1992 169,587 9 Pine Ridge 2002 149,224 New Middle EE 2007 163,3 44 New Middle GG 2011 163,344 Total - Middle School 1,663,391 Vacant Land Total High Schools 1 lBarron Collier 1977 263,782 2 Golden Gate 2003 297,704 3 Ev ades City 1956 76 728 4 Gaff Coast 1996 274 512 5 hnmokalee 1 1973 2l,3 1.3l, 2011 FY MV- I _,w (1) Sources: Collier County School District Property Schedule 2005 -2006, DSBCC Capital Improvement Plan FY 2007 -25, and discussions with DSBCC staff (2) Construction of Elementary School I completed in FY 2005 /06 and thus is not included in the DS13CC Property Schedule 2005 -2006 or FY 2007 -25 CIP. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County April 2006 A -2 School Impact Fee Update Study Table 11 Bull6ng Cost Index(') 2001 3574 Yi 2002 3823 1.4 2003 3693 1.9 2004 3984 7.9 2005 4205 5.5 DA varaq (1) Source: Engineering News- Record, Buildirg Cost In M- Aten -year trend for rnerketvalues of countyvdde land (including buildings and Ometires) Is ewluatM M Aafirrrine the hietnr iml Manna in land va luoc This enal"is BACKUP DOCUMENTATION lG I�- ;, Z /ig /3 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY PLANNING V W A This Agreement is entered into by and between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as "County ") and the District School Board of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "School Board "), together the Parties. WHEREAS, the Parties recognize their mutual obligation and responsibility for the education, nurturing and general well -being of the children of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the benefits to the citizens and students of their community by more closely coordinating their comprehensive land use and school facilities planning programs to ensure: (1) better coordination of new schools in time and place with land development; (2) greater efficiency for the School Board and the County by the placement of schools to take advantage of existing and planned roads, water, sewer, parks, and drainage systems; (3) improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and expanded schools with the road and sidewalk construction programs of the County; (4) the location and design of schools so that they serve as community focal points; (5) the location and design of schools with parks, ballfieids, libraries, and other community facilities to take advantage ofjoint use opportunities; and (6) the location of new schools and expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools so as to reduce pressures contributing to urban sprawl and support existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, Section1013.33 (10), Florida Statutes, requires that the location of public educational facilities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan and implementing land development regulations of the appropriate local governing body; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3177(6)(h) 1 and 2, Florida Statutes, require each local government to adopt an intergovernmental coordination element as part of its comprehensive plan that states principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of the School Board, and describe the processes for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections and public school siting; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2, Florida Statutes, further requires each county, all the municipalities within that county, and the district school board to establish by interlocal or other formal agreement executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described above consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination element; and WHEREAS, the Parties enter into this Agreement in fulfillment of the above referenced statutory requirements and in recognition of the benefits accruing to their citizens and students described above; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Interiocal Agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Section 163.3177(6)(h)2., and Section 1013.33(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, upon the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) acceptance of this Agreement, and upon the commitment of the Parties hereto to abide by and seek fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, that DCA shall recognize the Agreement as fully satisfying Florida Statutes Sections 1013.33 and 163.3177 requirements for cooperative planning for all Parties involved, both individually and collectively. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the public benefits to be realized from the coordinated planning and review of public educational facilities, the Parties hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals The foregoing recitals are adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. The following procedures will be used to coordinate public facilities planning arid land use planning: Section 2. Joint Workshop Meetings 2.1 A staff working group from the County and School Board will meet on an as needed basis, but no less frequently than twice per year, to formulate recommendations and discuss issues regarding coordination of land use and school facility planning, including such issues as population and student enrollment projections, development trends, school needs, co- location and joint use opportunities, and ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support the schools and ensure safe student access. Representatives from the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council will also be invited to attend. The School Board staff, in coordination with the County Manager will be responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing the necessary notification for the first meeting in 2003. Thereafter, the process for meeting notification will be established by a majority of the members of the working group then present. 4% 2.2 One or more of the elected members of the County Commission and the School Board will meet every other year in joint workshop session. Additional workshops may be held upon request by either the County Commission or the School Board. The joint workshop sessions will be opportunities for the County Commission and the School Board to build consensus, and set direction regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including, but not limited to the following: population and student estimates and projections, development trends, school needs, off -site improvements, and joint use opportunities. The County Manager and School Board Superintendent will be jointly responsible for making meeting arrangements and providing notification for the joint workshop. Section 3. Student Enrollment and Population Projections 3.1 In fulfillment of their respective planning duties, the County and the School Board agree to coordinate their respective plans based upon agreed upon projections of the amount, type and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. 3.2 The School Board shall utilize the Department of Education (DOE) five -year county -wide student enrollment projections. The School Board may request that the DOE projections be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment and development trends not anticipated by the DOE projections. In formulating such a request the School Board will coordinate with the County regarding future population projections and growth. Five - year population and student enrollment projections shall be revised annually to ensure that new residential development and redevelopment information provided by the County are reflected in the updated projections. 3.3 The County staff, in coordination with the School Board will use information on County growth and development trends for unincorporated areas, such as census information on population and housing characteristics, persons -per- household figures, historic and projected growth rates, and the information described in Subsection 4.2 of this Agreement, to project residential units by type for five years (single family, multi - family and mobile home) and allocate these units into sub - county planning sectors, such as student attendance zones consistent with county -wide projections. The planning sectors will be established by _ mutual consent of the School Board and the County. The allocation of residential units by type and planning sector will be provided to the School Board by September 1st of each year. a 3.4 The School Board will evaluate the planning sector projections prepared by the County. The School Board working with the County will develop and apply student generation multipliers for residential units by type for schools of each type, including, but not limited to, traditional public elementary, middle and high schools, as well as, charter, alternative and vocational schools, considering past trends in student enrollment within specific planning sectors in order to project school enrollment. The school enrollment projections will be included in the Educational Facilities Report provided to the County each year as specified in Subsection 4.1 of this Agreement. 3.5 Population Projections: Coordination regarding the update of the County population projections, their allocation into planning sectors, and conversion into projected student enrollment will occur on an annual basis at the staff working group meeting described in Subsection 2.1 of this Agreement. The revised projections and the variables utilized in making the projections will be reviewed and established by agreement of the staff working group. Secfion 4. Coordinating and Sharing of Information 41 Educational Facilities Report: By November 15` of each year, the School Board shall submit to the County an Educational Facilities Report. The report will contain information in tabular, graphic, and textual formats detailing existing and projected school enrollment, existing educational facilities, their locations, the number of portable units (hereinafter "portables ") in use at each school, and projected facility needs. The Report will also contain the School Board's capital improvement plan, including planned facilities with funding over the next 5 years, and a description of any unmet needs. The Report will provide data for each individual school concerning school capacity based on DOE criteria and enrollment of each individual school based on actual student counts. The Report will show the generalized locations in which new schools will be needed, along with planned renovations, expansions and closures of existing schools. The Report will indicate properties the School Board has already acquired through developer donation, or properties for which there is a developer obligation to provide property to the School Board, at the School Board's discretion, or properties acquired through other means that are potential school sites. 0 4.2 Growth and Development Trends: On September 18t of each year, the County will provide the School Board with a report on annual growth and development trends. The report will contain information in tabular, graphic and textual formats and will include information regarding development approvals for the preceding year as follows: (a) the type, number, and location of residential dwelling units, which have received zoning approval, final subdivision plat approval, or site plan approval; (b) a summary of all comprehensive plan amendments to include a description of any land use changes and the location of the affected area; (c) the number of building permits issued for new residential dwelling units and the location of such residential dwelling units; (d) information regarding the conversion or redevelopment of housing or other structures into residential dwelling units which are likely to generate new students; and (e) identification of any development orders issued which contain a requirement for the provision of a school site as a condition of development approval. The estimated number of students generated from the development approvals from new residential dwelling units will be used in the data and analysis to support the annual update of the School Board's Five -year Capital Facilities Plan. Section 5. School Site Selection 5.1 The School Board will establish an informal site evaluation committee for the purpose of reviewing potential sites for new schools and proposals for renovation, expansion and closure of existing schools, and making suggested recommendations to the District Site Selection Committee, the Superintendent and the School Board. The site evaluation committee will be a standing committee and will meet on an as needed basis. in addition to appropriate 1 members of the school district staff, the informal site evaluation committee will include at least one County staff member appointed by the County Manager. The committee membership will be expanded as needed to include additional County staff. When the need for a new school site is identified in the district facilities work program, the site evaluation committee will develop a list of potential sites in the area of need identified in the educational plant survey. The list of potential sites and list of schools proposed for renovation, expansion or closure will be submitted to the County for an informal assessment regarding consistency with the County comprehensive plan including: environmental suitability, transportation and pedestrian access, availability of infrastructure and services, safety concerns, and land use compatibility. In addition, consistency with community vision and other issues such as student assignment that have a bearing on site suitability will be commented upon. The issues identified in Subsection 5.2 of this Agreement will also be considered by both the County and site evaluation committee as each potential site and each school proposed for renovation, expansion or closure is evaluated. Based on the information gathered during this review, the site evaluation committee will make a recommendation to the District Site Selection Committee concerning the selection of potential school sites in order of preference, and, if applicable, schools proposed for renovation, expansion or closure in order of preference. 5.2 The following matters will be considered by the informal site evaluation committee, the County and the School Board when evaluating potential school sites or the expansion or rebuilding of existing schools, including charter schools: The location of school sites that will provide logical focal points for community activities such as the community facilities itemized in Subsection 9.1 and serve as the cornerstone for innovative urban design standards, including opportunities for shared use and co- location of community facilities. b. The location of new elementary and middle schools proximate to residential neighborhoods. C. The location of new schools within reasonable walking distance of the residential dwelling ' units served by the schools, as practicable, under the student assignment program. 6 Soil characteristics that indicate the proposed site is suitable for development or is adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with the provision of drainage improvements. M. The proposed location in relation to County stormwater management plans or watershed management plans. n. The proposed location in relation to the velocity flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the County Growth Management Plan. o. The ability of the site to accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles. d. The location of new high schools on the periphery of residential neighborhoods, with access to major roads. e. Compatibility of the school site with present and projected uses of adjacent property. f. Encouragement of community redevelopment and revitalization and efficient use of existing infrastructure and discouraging urban sprawl. g. Land availability, site acquisition and development costs, and degree of urbanization. h. Safe access to and from the school site by pedestrians and vehicles. I. Availability of public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed school, concurrent with the impacts of the school. j. Environmental constraints that could preclude development of a public school on the site if mitigation is not available or practicable. k. Impact on archaeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by the County as a locally significant historic or archaeological resource. Soil characteristics that indicate the proposed site is suitable for development or is adaptable for development and outdoor educational purposes with the provision of drainage improvements. M. The proposed location in relation to County stormwater management plans or watershed management plans. n. The proposed location in relation to the velocity flood zone, a floodway, or the Coastal High Hazard Area, as delineated in the County Growth Management Plan. o. The ability of the site to accommodate the required parking, circulation and queuing of vehicles. 14 P. The proposed location in relation to any airports considering the requirements of Section 333.03, Florida Statutes, which regulates the construction of public educational facilities in the vicinity of an airport. 5.3 As early as practicable, but no less than 60 days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility, or initiating the renovation or expansion of an existing school, the School Board shall provide written notice of same to the County. The County, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the School Board within 45 days if the proposed new school site or the proposed renovation or expansion of an existing school is consistent with the land use categories and policies of the County's Growth Management Plan. This preliminary notice does not constitute the County's determination of consistency pursuant to Section 1013.33(11), Florida Statutes. Section 6. Supporting Infrastructure In conjunction with the preliminary consistency determination described at Subsection 5.3 of this Agreement, the School Board and the County will jointly determine the need for, and timing of, on -site and off -site infrastructure improvements necessary to serve each new school or the proposed renovation, or expansion of an existing school, and will enter into a written agreement as to the timing and location, and the entity or entities responsible for constructing, operating and maintaining the required improvements. Section 7. Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezonings, and Development Approvals 7.1 The County will include a nonvoting representative appointed by the School Board on the local planning agency, or equivalent agencies, to attend those meetings at which the agency considers comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density on the property that is the subject of the application. The County may, at its discretion, grant voting status to the School Board representative. The School Board will receive 1 local planning agency's agendas and appropriate backup materials from the County and will review and comment as - appropriate. 7.2 The County will provide the School Board notification of all land use applications and development proposals pending before it that may affect student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. Such notice will be provided at least 14 days prior to approval of the application. This notice requirement applies to amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Element and Map rezonings, developments of regional impact, and other major residential or mixed -use development projects. 7.3 After notification by the County, the School Board will advise the County of the school enrollment impacts anticipated to result from the proposed land use application or development proposal, and whether sufficient capacity exists or is planned in order to accommodate the impacts. School capacity will be reported consistent with DOE criteria. 7.4 Based on the DOE definition of adequate capacity, if sufficient capacity is not available or planned to serve the development at the time of impact, the School Board shall specify how it proposes to meet the anticipated student enrollment demand; alternatively, the School Board, County, and developer may collaborate to find a means to ensure that sufficient school capacity will be available to accommodate the residential development, such as, developer contributions, project phasing, required facility improvements and school impact fees. 7.5 In reviewing and approving land use applications, rezoning requests and development proposals, the County will consider, if applicable, the following issues when requested by the School Board: a. Providing school sites and facilities within planned neighborhoods. b. Insuring the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites. c. The co-location of parks, recreation and community facilities with school sites. d. The linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks. —49 e. Insuring the development of traffic circulation plans to serve schools and the surrounding neighborhood. W 4 Providing off -site signalization, signage, access improvements and sidewalks to serve all schools. The inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new developments. h. Encouraging the private sector to identify and implement creative solutions to developing adequate school facilities in residential developments. School Board comments on Growth Management Plan amendments and other land -use decisions. j. Available school capacity or planned improvements to increase school capacity. 7.6 In formulating community development plans and programs, the County will consider the following issues: JO a. Target community development improvements in older and distressed neighborhoods near schools. b. Coordinate County programs and capital improvements that are consistent with and meet the capital needs identified in the School Board's school facilities plan. C. Encourage developments and property owners to donate school sites at predevelopment prices, assist with the construction of new facilities or renovation to existing facilities, and provide transportation alternatives. d. Address and resolve multi - jurisdictional public school issues. Section 8. Educational Plant Survey and Five -Year District Facilities Work Program 8.1 At least one year prior to preparation of the educational plant survey update, the staff working group established in Subsection 2.1 of this Agreement will assist the School Board in an advisory capacity in the preparation of this update. The staff working group will evaluate and make recommendations regarding the location and need for new 1 n educational facilities, or improvements to existing educational facilities in terms of consistency with the County Growth Management Plan, and relevant issues listed at Subsections 5.2, 7.5 and 9.1 of this Agreement. 8.2 The School Board will provide the proposed annual update of the five -year district facilities work program to the County for review and comment for consistency with the County Growth Management Plan prior to adoption. The County may provide written comments to the School Board within 30 days following receipt of the proposed work program. Section 9. Co- location and Shared Use 9.1 Co- location and shared use of facilities are important to both the School Board and the County. The School Board will look for opportunities to co- locate and share use of school facilities and civic facilities when preparing the Educational Plant Survey. Likewise, co- location and shared use opportunities will be considered by the County when preparing the updates to its Growth Management Plan, Schedule of Capital Improvements and when planning and designing new, or renovating existing, community facilities. For example, opportunities for co- location and shared use will be considered for libraries, parks, recreation facilities, community centers, auditoriums, learning centers, museums, performing arts centers, and stadiums. In addition, where applicable, co- location and shared use of school and governmental facilities for health care and social services will be considered. 9.2 A separate agreement between the School Board and the County or appropriate entity, will be developed for each instance of co- location and shared use which addresses legal liability, operating and maintenance costs, scheduling of use, and facility supervision. Section 10. Oversight Process The School Board and the County Commission shall each appoint a citizen member to serve on an oversight committee to monitor implementation of this Interlocal Agreement. Oversight Committee members shall be invited to attend all meetings referenced in Sections 2 and 5 hereof and shall receive copies of all reports and documents produced pursuant to this Agreement. The committee shall appoint a chairperson, meet at least annually, and report to the County 49 Commission and the School Board and the general public on the implementation of this Agreement together with its effectiveness. 11 40 Section 11. Site Plan Review Projects initiated by the School Board shall comply with applicable site development plan review requirements as set forth in a separate interlocal agreement entitled "Interlocal Agreement Between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida and the Collier County School Board to Establish Educational Plant and Ancillary Plant Site Development Review Processes and Substantive Criteria Including the Consideration of Future Amendment's to the County's Growth Management Plan and Implementing Land Development Regulations," which further refines and delineates the provisions and scope of a School Board Review process for site plan review of future School Board projects. Section 12. Resolution of Disputes If the Parties to this Agreement are unable to resolve any issue relative to this Agreement and with in which they may be in disagreement, such dispute will be resolved in accordance with governmental conflict resolution procedures specified in Chapters 164 and 186, Florida Statutes. Section 13. Amendment and Termination of Agreement Either party may elect to withdraw from participation in this Agreement upon official action of its governing body and after 30 days written notice to the other party to this Agreement. Section 14. Execution This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument and be the agreement between the parties. Section 15. Expiration The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of ten years; provided however, that either party can request a review of the Agreement every two years. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Agreement has been executed by the Parties by their duly authorized officials on the date set forth below. ATTEST: trwen's 12 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: fy-, David C. eigel, Coun Attorney ATTEST: 4048571 I* Date: 5.2.03 COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD Dr. H. BWfrad ._ ... Date: �olfs 3 Z 08 13 1jj( 3ZZ� 9U . z 98 q Z�Zo� INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO ESTABLISH EDUCATIONAL PLANT AND ANCILLARY PLANT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESSES AND SUBSTANTIVE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THIS AGREEMENT made by and between Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as the "County') and the Collier County School Board, a public agency of the State of Florida; hereinafter (referred to as the "School Board'), together the "Parties." WHEREAS, the County and the School Board have established and maintained a cooperative and productive relationship with regard to the exchange of information on matters of mutual interest including, but not limited to, the coordination of planning efforts to ensure that support services are available for public educational facilities in the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(1), Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth the policy of the State with regard to the coordination of planning between school boards and local governing bodies to ensure that plans for the construction and opening of public educational facilities are facilitated and coordinated in time and place with plans for residential development, concurrently with other services; and WHEREAS, Section' 1013.33(9), Florida Statutes, in order to encourage and facilitate such planning, provides that the School Board and the County must share and coordinate information related to existing and planned public school facilities, proposals for development, redevelopment or additional development, and infrastructure required to support the public school facilities concurrent with the proposed development; and WHMEAS, the County and School Board have shared such information for numerous years and continue to share such information so that each entity can assist the other in reaching its goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(l 1), Florida Statutes, sets forth the policy of the State with regard to an expedited review process to determine consistency with the local government's comprehensive plan and land development regulations, and where this Agreement details a consistency review process; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(12), Florida Statutes, sets forth the policy of the State with regard to an expedited review process and any development review shall not exceed 90 days, and where this Agreement details a School Board Review process; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(13), Florida Statutes, provides that a local governing body may not deny the site applicant on the adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of ^ 4V the school if the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses. The local government may not deny the application but it may impose reasonable development standards and conditions in accordance with Section 1013.51(1), Florida Statutes, and consider the site plan and its adequacy as its relates 40 to environmental concerns, health, safety, welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed to; and WHEREAS, Section 1013.33(14), Florida Statutes, authorizes the School Board and the County to establish, by agreement, an alternative process for reviewing a proposed Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant, including the identification of off -site impacts of a proposed Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant, and where this Agreement details a School Board Review process to delineate a formal procedure pursuant to State law, and WHEREAS, through this Agreement the County and the School Board wish to maintain and enhance their cooperative and productive relationship regarding the exchange of information relating to planning efforts and public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the public benefits to be realized from the coordinated planning and review of public educational facilities, the parties hereby agree as follows: The foregoing recitals are adopted and incorporated by reference as if ad forth fully herein. 2. This Agreement is made pursuant to Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969, Chapter 1013, Florida Statutes, and terms used herein shall have the meaning set forth in such legislation. Specifically, the following terms as used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: A. "Adjacent' means lying near or adjoining. B. "Ancillary Plant" is comprised of the building, site and site improvements necessary to provide such facilities as vehicle maintenance, warehouses, maintenance, or administrative buildings necessary to provide support services to an educational program. C. "Auxiliary Facility" means the spaces located at educational plants which are not designed for student occupant stations. D. "Compatibility Review" means a review pursuant to the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within the Division 2.8 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time SBR Letters of Compliance are requested and that pertain to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complementary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts. The Compatibility Review will be limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening, and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. E. "Consistency Review" means a review process whereby the County will determine prior to the School Board's acquisition of property whether such property is consistent with the locational criteria of the Growth jManagement Plan's Future Land Use Element and Map, Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Immokalee Area Master Plan, and whether the Plant or Facility is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site, pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement. F. "County's implementing land development regulations" means the Collier County Land Development Code, including the zoning regulations and development regulations contained and referenced therein. G. `Educational Facilities" means the buildings and equipment, structures, and special educational use areas that are built, installed, or established to serve primarily the educational purposes and secondarily the social and recreational purposes of the community and which may lawfully be used as authorized by the Florida Statutes and approved by the Collier County School Board. H. `Educational Plant" comprises the educational facilities, site and site improvements necessary to accommodate students, facility, administrators, staff, and the activities of the educational program of each plant. I. "Locational Criteria" means the land use categories established in the Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element and Map, Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Immokalee Area Master Plan. L "School Board Review" ( "SBR ") means the site development plan review process for School Board projects as outlined in this Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 of this Agreement. K "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" ( "SREF') means the Florida Department of Education State Requirements for Educational Facilities, effective 1999, as amended. L. "1996 Interlocal Agreement" means the Interlocal Agreement between the Collier County School Board and Collier County as recorded in Official Record Book 2207, pages 1729 et seq., which bears an effective date of June 25, 1996. 3. The Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element (GGAMP) and Irmnol glee Area Master Plan Element (LAW) and the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time that the SBR Letters of Compliance are requested will determine the land use categories and zoning districts that permit or prolu'bit Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants within Collier County. A. Except to the extent that such would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE of the GMP adopted on June 19, 2002, Collier County will initiate and consider at duly advertised public hearings, amendments to the FLUE, GGAMP, and IAMP, and the LDC, to allow all future Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants in zoning districts as follows: Ancillary Plants will be permitted by right in the General Commercial (C-4); Heavy Commercial (C -5); and Industrial (1) Zoning Districts. Ancillary Plants will be prohibited in the RSF -1 through RSF-6; Residential Single Family; Mobile Home (Mli); Travel Trailer - Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC); Golf Course (GC); and Conservation (CON) Zoning Districts. Ancillary Plants will be permitted by conditional use approval in all other Zoning Districts. Educational Plants will be prohibited in Residential Tourist (RT); Golf Course (GC); Conservation (CON); Travel Trailer. Recreational Vehicle Campground ('ITRVC); Business Park (BP); and Industrial (I) Zoning Districts. (5) Educational plants will be permitted by right in all other zoning districts. Provided further, however, that for a high school facility to be located in any residential zoning district (RSF, RMF, MH, VR, Village Residential) or any residential component of a PUD, a formal Compatibility Review and determination will be required pursuant to Section 5(B) of this Agreement. In the event that the County denies an application based on the Compatibility Review, the School District may request an appeal to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as outlined in Section 7 of this Agreement. B. The parties recognize that Planned Unit Development (PM) zoning is prevalent in Collier County, and as such, Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants as defined in Section 2 of this Agreement, are permitted uses in PUD designations if specifically set forth in the PUD Document and approved by the BCC as a permitted principal use. To assist in increasing the number of PUDs that may permit Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants, Collier County will, during review of each PUD subject to the sunsetting provision of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, consider the appropriateness, in conjunction with the School Board, of adding Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants as a permitted use in the PUD. The County will consider the School Board's input in determining whether an Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant should be included as a permitted principal use within any new PUD, during the PUD rezone application process. Furthermore, Collier County will initiate and consider amendments to the LDC at duly advertised public hearings that will limit the review of any such PUD amendment for the sole purpose of adding Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants, to the review of the Plant facilities only and the impacts associated with those added uses without further right by the County to review other issues or change other sections of the PUD Document. �1_- 4 J Is C. Educational Plants or Ancillary Plants, whether permitted as a principal use within a PUD or in a conventional zoning district or by way of conditional use approval, will be subject to the SBR process pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 of this Agreement. D. Existing Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants. (1) Existing Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants shall be deemed consistent with the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable. All existing, developed Educational Plant and Ancillary Plant sites, inclusive of the four Educational Plants under construction at time of this Agreement (Site E: Sabal Palm, Golden Gate Intermediate Center - South, Golden Gate Intermediate Center - North, and Golden Gate High School) will be identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) or Map Series to be adopted as part of the FLUE, at the initiation of Collier County, at its expense. The addition of these sites on the FLUM is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be necessary under this Agreement, or to proceed with the construction of any facilities. (a) On -site expansions shall be subject to the procedures established in Section 6.G.(2) of this Agreement. (b) Expansions beyond the boundaries of the existing sites as demonstrated by the legal description shall be subject to the Consistency Review and the School Board Review process as set forth in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement. E. Existing Undeveloped Sites Acquired by the School District for Educational Plants. (1) In order to meet future needs and maximize the use of the public's tax dollars and to comply with the legislative mandate to plan for future schools, the School Board has acquired a number of sites for future Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants, With the exception as noted in subsections (o), (p) and (q) below, for the three sites in the Rural Fringe Area, these sites have been determined to be consistent with the locational criteria of the GMP only and GMP amendments will be proposed to include these sites on the FLUM. Once locational consistency has been determined for the sites delineated in subsections (o), (p) and (q) below, GMP amendments will be proposed to include these sites on the FLUM. The sites are as follows: (a) Intermediate Center South -W Terace S.W., proposed elementary school; (b) Intermediate Center North -50m Terrace S.W., proposed elementary school; 0 -4 (c) Intermediate Center on Hunter Blvd., proposed elementary school; (d) School Site G — Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD, proposed elementary school; (e) School Site I — future E/W Livingston Road, proposed elementary /middle school; (fj School Site M — Lely Resort PUD, proposed elementary/middle school; (g) Livingston Road School Site, East side of Livingston Road, proposed elementary/middle school; (h) Rattlesnake Hammock Road Site — adjacent to South County bus compound, proposed transportation facility; (i) School Site BB — west side of Livingston Road, proposed middle school; (j) School Site E — 186 Avenue N.E., proposed elementary/middle school; (k) School Site F — SW comer of Everglades Blvd. and 6o" Avenue N.E., proposed elementary/middle school; (1) School Site J — N.W. comer of Everglades Blvd. and 126 Avenue S.E., proposed elementary/middle school; (m) School Site EE — 186 Avenue N.E., proposed elementary/middle school; (n) School Site BBB — Oil Well Road, Orange Tree PLID, proposed elementary/middle/high school or transportation facility; (o) School Site H and CC — Blue Sage Drive, proposed elementary/middle school (see subsection 3. E. (2) below); (p) School Site L and EEE — north of 136 Street N.W., proposed elementary/ middle/high school and transportation facility (see subsection 3.E.(2) below); (q) School Site DD and DDD — south of 206 Street S.E., proposed elementary/ middle/high school (see subsection 3.E.(2) below); C to (r) Immokalee School Site — north side of Lake Trafford Road, proposed elementary/middle schools; and (s) Immokalee Maintenance and Transportation Satellite — State Road.29, proposed transportation facility. (2) Sites delineated in Subsections 3.E.(1) (o), (p), and (q) of this Agreement are within the Rural Fringe Area, an area subject to the Final Order No. AC -99 -002 issued June 22, 1999, by the Governor and Cabinet of the State of Florida sitting as the Administration Commission. Pursuant to the Final Order, amendments to the GMP were adopted on June 19, 2002, including the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. These amendments were subsequently found to be "in compliance' by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, but two challenges were filed to that compliance finding. Accordingly, those amendments are not yet in effect. This affects the consistency determination for those three sites. Also, the sites delineated in subsection 3.E.(I)(o) of this Agreement, designated Rural Fringe Neutral Lands, are in an area that is subject to a specific requirement for performance of a Red- cockaded Woodpecker Study. The results of that study could lead to a GMP amendment to change the land use designation, thereby affecting the consistency determination for those sites. Furthermore, sites delineated in subsection 3.E.(1)(q) of this Agreement are partially within the Rural Fringe Neutral Lands and partially in the Rural Fringe Sending Lands. The Sending Lands designation provides for submittal of environmental data to demonstrate the appropriateness of a land use designation change. This could potentially result in a brad use designation change for the Sending Lands thereby affecting the consistency determination for those sites. (3) The parties acknowledge that due to the changes in the population figures and legislation, certain of the above sites may be designated for other purposes if consistent with all elements of the GMP, and applicable portions of the LDC as set forth in this Agreement, in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested. (4) If consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable, and not within a PUD, or within a PUD that allows Educational Plants as a permitted principal use, then the Educational Plant shall be allowed as a matter of right. All such sites will be identified on the FLUM or Map Series to be 4V adopted as part of the FLUE, at the initiation of Collier County at its expense. For sites within the Rural Fringe Area designated as Neutral Lands, the site area and school size shall be subject to the General Education Facilities Report submitted annually by the School Board to the BCC. All such sites must comply with the State Requirements for Educational Facilities adopted by the State Board of Education. (5) If consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable, but within a PUD that does not allow Educational Plants as a permitted principal use, then the Educational Plant shall only be allowed if an amendment to the PUD is adopted by the BCC at a duly advertised public hearing to make the Educational Plant a permitted principal use. Such a PUD amendment shall be initiated by the Collier County School Board at its expense. (6) For part of the sites delineated in Subsection E.(1)(q) above Which is in the Sending Area of the Rural Fringe which is not consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, or for the sites delineated in Subsections E.(1)(o), (p) and (q) of this Agreement in the Rural Fringe area whose consistency with the locational criteria changes based upon Subsection E.(2) of this Agreement, as applicable, the Collier County School Board may, at its expense, initiate an amendment to the appropriate Element so as to make such a site consistent with the locational criteria Such a GMP amendment must also include an amendment to add the site to the FLUM or Map Series. Additionally, any such site must be located within a zoning district that allows the Educational Plant as a permitted principal use. Otherwise, a rezone petition must be filed and approved by the BCC at a duly advertised public hearing and remain valid in order for the use to be allowed as a matter of right. The filing and expense of any necessary rezone petition shall be the responsibility of the Collier County School Board. (7) Any future expansions beyond the boundaries of the existing Educational Plant sites, as demonstrated by the legal description, shall be subject to the Consistency Review and SBR process set forth in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement. (8) For any GMP amendment which is initiated to add the sites to the FLUM or Map Series, such amendment is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be necessary under this Agreement, nor is it a prerequisite to the commencement of construction. F. Existing Undeveloped Sites Acquired by the School District for Ancillary Plants. 1 (1) If consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable, and within a zoning district that allows the Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use, then the Ancillary Plant shall be allowed as a matter of right. All such sites will be identified on the PLUM or Map Series to be adopted as part of the FLUE, at the initiation of Collier County at its expense. (2) The sites delineated in Subsections 3.E.(1) (h), (n) and (p), of this Agreement, are consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable, but not within a zoning district that allows the Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use, and those plants shall only be allowed if a rezone petition, or a conditional use petition, as applicable, is filed at the initiation of the Collier County School Board at its expense, and is approved by the BCC or BZA at a duly advertised public hearing thereby allowing such Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal or conditional use, and such rezone or conditional use approval remains valid Sites delineated in Subsections 3.E.1(h) and (n) of this Agreement will be identified on the FLUM or Map Series to be adopted as part of the FLUE, at the initiation of Collier County at its expense. The sites delineated in Subsection 3.E.(1)(p) of this Agreement are in the Rural Fringe Area, as noted and discussed in Subsection 3.E.(2) of this Agreement. Once locational consistency has been determined for the sites delineated in Subsection 3.E.(1)(p), a GMT amendment will be proposed to include the sites on the PLUM or Map Series, at Collier County's expense. (3) Sites delineated in Subsection 3.E.(1)(p) of this Agreement may not be consistent with the locational criteria of the FLUE, GGAMP or LAMP, as applicable, pursuant to the Rural Fringe issues detailed in Subsection 3.E.(2) of this Agreement. Should this site become inconsistent, the Collier County School Board may, at its expense, initiate an amendment to the appropriate Element so as to make such site consistent with the locational criteria. Additionally, this site must also be located within a zoning district that allows the Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use, otherwise a rezone petition, or conditional use petition, as applicable, must be filed and approved by the BCC or BZA at a duly advertised public hearing. The approval must remain valid in order for the use to be allowed as a matter of right. The filing and expense of any necessary rezone or conditional use petition shall be the responsibility of the Collier County School Board. Subsequent to the amendment to the appropriate Element becoming effective, Collier County will, at its expense, initiate an amendment to the Future Land Use Map or Map Series to add the site. (4) The parties acknowledge that due to the change in the population figures and legislation, certain of the sites listed in Subsection !—A 3.E.(I) of this Agreement may be designated for other purposes if consistent with all elements of the GMT, and the applicable portions of the LDC as set forth in this Agreement, in effect at the time that a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested. Any future expansions beyond the boundaries of the existing Ancillary Plant sites as demonstrated by the legal description, shall be subject to the Consistency Review and the SBR process as set forth in Sections 5 and 6 of this Agreement. For any GNP amendment that the County initiates to add the sites to the FLUM, such amendment is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be necessary under this Agreement, nor is it a prerequisite to the commencement of construction. G. Future Sites for Educational and Ancillary Plants. (1) If consistent with the locational criteria of the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP of the GNP, as applicable, and within a zoning district that allows the Educational or Ancillary Plant as a permitted . principal use, then the plant shall be allowed as a matter of right. Once acquired, the site will be identified on the PLUM or Map. Series to be adopted as part of the FLUE, at the initiation of Collier County at its expense. (2) If consistent with the location] criteria in the FLUE, GGAMP or LAW, as applicable, but within a PUD that does not allow Educational Plants or Ancillary Plants as a permitted principal use, then the Educational or Ancillary Plant, as applicable` shall only be allowed if an amendment to the PUD to make the Plant a permitted principal use, at the initiation of the Collier County School Board at its expense, is approved by the BCC at a duly advertised public hearing. Subsequent to acquisition by the Collier County School Board, Collier County will, at its expense, initiate an amendment to the PLUM or Map Series to add the site. (3) If consistent with the locational criteria of the FLUE, GGAMP or JAW, as applicable, and not within a PUD, but within a zoning district that does not allow the Educational or Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use, then the plant shall only be allowed if a rezone petition or conditional use petition, as applicable, is filed, at the initiation of the Collier County School Board at its expense, and such amendment or conditional use, as applicable, is approved by the BCC or BZA at a duly advertised public hearing to make the Educational or Ancillary Plant a permitted principal use. Thereafter, the Educational or Ancillary Plant shall be allowed on the site as a matter of right. Subsequent to acquisition by the Collier County School Board, Collier County will, at its expense, initiate an amendment to the FLUM or Map Series to add the site. 10 (4) If not consistent with the locational criteria of the FLUE, GGAMP or IAMP, as applicable, and within a PUD that does not allow Educational or Ancillary Plants as a permitted principal use, then the plant shall only be allowed if an amendment to the appropriate Element to make such site consistent with the locational criteria is filed, at the initiation of the Collier County School Board at its expense, and is approved by the BCC and becomes effective. Such a GMP amendment must also include an amendment to add the site to the FLUM or Map Series. Additionally, the plant shall only be allowed if an amendment to the PUD, initiated by the Collier County School Board at its expense, is approved by the BCC at a duly advertised public hearing thereby allowing such Educational or Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use. Thereafter, the Educational or Ancillary Plant shall be allowed on the site as a matter of right. (5) If not consistent with the locational criteria in the FLUE, G TAMP or LAMP, as applicable, not within a PUD, and in .a zoning district that does not allow the Educational or Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use, then the plant shall only be allowed if an amendment is filed, at the initiation of the Collier County School Board at its expense to the appropriate GMP Element so as to make such a site consistent with the locational criteria of same, and- such amendment must be approved by the BCC at a duly advertised public hearing and thereafter become legally effective. Such a GMP amendment must also include an amendment to add the site to the FLUM or Map Series. Additionally, the Plant shall only be allowed if a rezone petition or conditional use petition, as applicable, initiated by the Collier County School Board at its expense, is approved by the BCC or BZA at a duly advertised public hearing thereby allowing such Educational or Ancillary Plant as a permitted principal use. Thereafter, the Educational or Ancillary Plant shall be allowed on the site as a matter of right. (6) Any future expansions beyond the boundaries of the Educational or Ancillary Plant site as demonstrated by the legal description, shall be subject to the Consistency Review and the School Board Review process as set forth in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement. () For any GMP amendment that the County initiates to add the sites to the FLUM, such amendment is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be necessary under this Agreemett, nor is it a prerequisite to the commencement of construction. 1 (8) It is understood, pursuant to Section 3A of this Agreement, that conditional use petitions will not be required for an Educational Plant. j 11 I& H. All proposed development to take place on all existing, proposed and future sites for Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants must be consistent with each and every other applicable Element of the GMP. 4. The following process will be followed with respect to future Educational Plant and Ancillary Plant sites, prior to acquisition, for both the determination of consistency with the Collier County GMP locational criteria and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site. Consistency with all other Elements of the GNP will be reviewed during the SBR process. A. Consistency Review: The Consistency Review will be conducted as follows: (1) Prior to the purchase of a site for an Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant, the School District will request a pro - application meeting with the County. (2) The County will schedule a pre - application meeting with the School District within three (3) weeks of a request being submitted to the County. (3) The County will review the proposed site for consistency with the FLUE, GGAMP, LAMP, as well as the LDC and fundamental planning and design principles including compatibility with surrounding uses, complementary pattern of development, landscaping and buffering concerns, stormwater management, configuration of the traffic circulation systems, consideration of natural resources and mitigation of on -site and off -site negative impacts. The County will provide a consistency determination based only on the locational criteria of the FLUE and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site. Consistency with all other Elements of the GMP will be determined during the SBR Review process. The following additional information will be submitted to determine major issues that may affect site feasibility: (a) Land Use. A general location map showing surrounding development with the property outlined, a recent aerial of the site showing boundaries, source and date and a map and summary table of existing land uses and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from the boundaries of the subject property. (b) Fudge Land Use Desig an lion. A map of the subject property designating each use, such as elementary, middle, or high school and whether such use includes a stadium, with acreage tables for each land use designation. 12 (c) Env A recent aerial and summary table of native habitats and soils occurring on the site; a table of Federal and State listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site. (d) (e) M (g) Growth Management. Identification of any Area of Critical State Concern and Development of Regional Impact. Timing_ and J=act of Develoommt. Indication of whether the proposed site is intended for inclusion in the School Board's capital plan projection and if so, identification of the year. Public Facilities and Transportation The School Board will indicate the proposed existing Level of Service Standards (LOS) and the School Board's provider and method of treatment for potable water and sanitary sewer services, Arterial and Collector roads, drainage and solid waste facilities. Where applicable, service availability letters will also be provided. The School Board will provide a map detailing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the proposed site. The School Board will identify any flood zone, wellfield, traffic congestion boundary, coastal management boundary and high noise contours which relate to the proposed site. (4) Within 45 days of the submission of the information outlined in Section 4.A(3) of this Agreement, the County will provide written comments and recommendations to the School District along with a determination of the site's consistency with the GMP locational criteria and LDC zoning districts. Necessary on- site and off-site improvements will be identified for these sites and the parties responsible for these improvements to the extent this can be determined during this locational Consistency Review. (5) Letter of Consistency: After the County review, the Planning Services Director, or his designee, shall issue a Letter of Consistency for the GMP locations] criteria and whether the Plant is a permitted use, conditional use or prohibited use in the zoning district on the site, which shall evidence the County's determination of consistency as required by Section 1013.33(11) Florida Statutes. + (6) After the County has determined that the site is consistent with the GNP locational criteria and LDC zoning districts, the School 13 District shall have up to one year to acquire the site. Once the site is acquired, the site shall be deemed to remain consistent regardless of later changes to either the GMP or LDC. (7) After the School District acquires the site and provides the necessary documentation for the County to initiate an amendment to the GNP, the County and School District will enter into a written agreement as part of the pre- application process detailed in Section 6 (D)(2) of this Agreement, as to the timing and location, and the entity or entities responsible for construction, operation and maintenance of the required improvements. 5. SCHOOL BOARD REVIEW The County will conduct an expedited site plan review for all Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants to ensure compliance and/or consistency with the GMP, fundamental planning and design principles, compatibility with surrounding uses, complementary pattern of development, configuration of the traffic circulation systems, consideration of natural resources and mitigation of negative impacts, as follows: A. Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures, Ordinance No. 01 -57, as amended. (1) In accordance with Ordinance No. 01 -57, that portion of the water and/or wastewater system that lies in the public rights -of- way or in County utility easements (CUE) shall be conveyed to the Collier County Water /Sewer District, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (2) All water and wastewater systems shall be built in accordance with the Collier County Utility Technical Standards Manual in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested. (3) Division 3.16 of the LDC designed to protect local government water supply wellfields from land uses that may pollute shall apply. (4) Off -site improvements shall be in accordance with the current update of the Water and Wastewater Master Plan and must include any agreement necessary to assign the responsibility for the cost of upsizing said water and/or wastewater facilities. (5) The School District shall be responsible for all materials and/or real property required for the water and/or wastewater system Any expansions and/or renovations to existing school facilities shall require a review by the Collier County Engineering Services Department to determine the need for a change in meter sizing and additional grease traps. AS (6) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Permits shall be submitted prior to the issuance of an SBR approval. 14 + B. Compatibility Review. The County will conduct a Compatibility Review which will take into account the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within Division 2.8 of the LDC in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested and that pertain to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complementary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts, limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. In addition, the Utility Billing and Customer Service (UBCS) Department shall ascertain that there is ample space for the trash dumpster(s) or compactor(s) and for the trash collection fianchisee to maneuver trucks in and out of the space allowed for the dumpster(s) or compactor(s). With the exception of high school facilities, this Compatibility Review will be a courtesy review. For high school facilities, this will be a formal review process and is subject to the appeal process set forth in Section 7 of this Agreement in .the event that the County denies the application based on non - compliance with the items listed in this paragraph. C. Landscaping and Buffering. Division 2.4 of the LDC in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply. The County Planning Staff will recommend an amendment to the LDC allowing administrative deviations from the landscaping and buffering standards for essential services such as Educational and Ancillary Plants. Specifically, the County will recommend flexibility in the regulations for projects where there will be joint use by the County Department of Parks and Recreation and the School District. In the event that the BCC approves the recommended amendment, administrative deviations may be granted provided the School District can demonstrate that the intent of this Division can be effectively accomplished without meeting the specific development standards. The administrative deviations shall be requested in the format act forth in Section 2.8.2.5 of the LDC. D. Environmental regulations for compliance with the Collier County GMP Conservation and Coastal Management Element in effect at the time a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply as follows: (1) On a site by site basis, County staff will determine the necessity for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be submitted. (2) The final SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit and all other agency permits for wetlands must be submitted prior to a determination that the SBR application is sufficient for review. (3) Submission of Protected Species Surveys and, if needed, wildlife management plans in accordance with Collier County's LDC and GMP in effect at the time of the issuance of the SBR Letter of Compliance along with United States Fish and Wildlife Service 4 (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) agency permits. IS (4) A site clearing plan must be submitted that shows the native vegetation areas to be preserved and identifies the upland/ wetlands preserve or protected species preserves. (5) The OW requires schools to provide a set percentage for native vegetation preservation in the Rural Fringe and the Rural Lands. The School Board must comply with the set percentages of native vegetation preservation. (6) An Exotic Vegetation Removal and Maintenance Plan must be submitted and approved prior to final SBR approval. All exotic vegetation shall be removed from the site of an Educational and Ancillary Plant prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (7) All environmental documentation must be submitted prior to a sufficiency determination on a SBR application. Failure to submit the required documentation will result in a determination of insufficiency and the formal review process will not commence until such documentation is received and the application is deemed sufficient for review. E. All State Fire Code regulations as they relate to the site plan and in effect at the time that a SBR Letter of Compliance is requested shall apply. The School District shall submit all building information necessary to determine site requirements including but not limited to fire flow requirements and fire sprinkler requirements. F. Collier County Stormwater Management Policies as follows: (1) A Drainage Plan, signed and sealed by a Florida Professional Engineer must be submitted along with design calculations in order to determine the proposed development's effect on County maintained drainage facilities. (2) SFWMD permits must be submitted prior to a determination that the SBR application is sufficient for review. (3) Easements for drainage improvements and access to them must be submitted prior to SBR approval. When necessary, the School Board will supply additional drainage easement area when necessitated by increased capacity to accommodate the proposed development. (4) if any dedications of easements for drainage, maintenance, and/or access are required, all necessary documentation to record the easement(s) shall be provided to the County prior to approval of the SBR. Prior to the County's issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, such easements shall be approved by the BCC and officially recorded. 16 G. Public Educational Plants and Ancillary Plants are deemed to be essential .public services and as such are subject to a Capital Improvement Element (CIE) review for a public facility adequacy analysis. H. Minimum yard setback requirements shall be 50 feet from all property lines for principal structures and 25 feet from all property lines for any accessory structures including portable classrooms. Off -Site Impacts - In accordance with Section 6 of the interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, the School District and Collier County will jointly determine the need for, and timing of, on -site and off -site infrastructure improvements in conjunction with the determination of the consistency of the site location with the GMP and LDC, and will enter into a written agreement at the preapplication stage pursuant to Section 6.D.(2) of this Agreement, as to the timing and location, and the entity or entities responsible for the cost, construction, operation and maintenance of the required improvements. In reaching a determination regarding responsibility for improvements, the parties will be guided as follows: (1) The School District shall be responsible for off -site improvements that are determined to be necessary to mitigate the off site impacts of the Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant. The improvements shall be constructed by the School Board at the School District's expense, unless the School District requests otherwise in writing and the County determines and agrees otherwise in writing. The School District shall not be required to pay more than its proportionate share of the cost of the off -site improvements necessitated by the Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant. Off -site improvements include, but are not necessarily limited to, the widening of adjacent roadways and the infrastructure relevant to same when necessitated to accommodate buses (if needed); construction of required deceleration turn lane(s) at ingress(es) and egress(es) points and at any intersections within the immediate vicinity of the school site which are adversely impacted as a direct result of the same; and any other improvements determined to be necessary by Collier County Transportation Services Division and the Public Utilities Division. (2) Tom Lanes - The School District shall be responsible for turn lane improvements adjacent to and/or in the vicinity of a site, including the cost and construction of same. Necessary turn lane improvement(s) determined by Collier County Transportation Staff shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first permanent Certificate of Occupancy. When said turn lane improvement(s), whether left turn lane(s) or right turn lane(s), are determined to 41 be necessary, right -of -way and/or compensating right -of -way, shall be provided in conjunction with said improvement(s), as determined by Collier County Transportation Staff. All turn lane - design criteria used shall be in accordance with the minimum 17 standards as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Design Standards as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. The turn lane queue length determinations shall be in accordance with the criterialcalculations of Chapter 17 within the Highway Capacity Manual. In conducting the aforementioned criteria/calculations the length of school buses must be considered to adequately address the turn lane queue length determinations. (3) Sidewalks — As part of the SBR process, the School Board and County will develop a sidewalk plan which delineates the sidewalks that are necessary in and around the project to establish the most direct connection to an existing network of sidewalks. The School Board shall collect funds through the school impact fees to provide for the development of these sidewalks as delineated in the sidewalk plan. The School Board shall provide funds from these impact fees to the County. The County will be responsible for the timing, cost, construction, and maintenance of such sidewalks. (4) The School District shall be responsible for the costs of any and all traffic signals) constructed due to and/or as a result of the impacts from an Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant, when it is determined to be warranted and approved by Collier County Transportation Staff. When wan-anted, upon the completion of the installation, inspection, burn -in period, and final approvaUacceptance of any and all traffic signal(s), the traffic signal(s) will be turned over to the County, and will then be operated and maintained by the County Transportation Operations Department. Any negotiations relevant to "fair share" payment(s), or reimbursement(s), from any and all other neighboring property owner(s), that directly benefit from the installation of the traffic signal(s), will be determined based upon the percentage of usage and impact. (5) Any and all traffic control devices and design criteria used shall be in accordance with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. (6) All traffic speed limit postings shall be in accordance with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, and the Speed Zoning Manual as adopted by the FDOT and as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. (7) The design of all transportation related improvements shall comply with the minimum standards and any amendments thereto as adopted by the FDOT, and as required by Chapter 316, Florida Statutes. is i (8) Any off-site improvements to be constructed by the School District, even though not required by the County, shall be subject to review by the Collier County Transportation Staff prior to construction to assure compliance with Collier County regulations. (9) In the event the School District proposes to expand an existing school site, Collier County Transportation Staff shall make its recommendations as to the improvements required to mitigate the off -site transportation impacts but only as they relate to such expansion. 6. SCHOOL BOARD REVIEW PROCESS. The SBR for School Board projects shall be reviewed under the following expedited process: A. The SBR application will be reviewed only as to the criteria set forth in Section 5 of this Agreement. B. The SBR application submittal shall be in accordance with Section 3.3 of the LDC, but only as to those submittal requirements which are consistent with, the review criteria set forth in Section 5 of this Agreement. C. The Parties will develop a checklist that defines the items to be submitted for a SBR review application. D. Prior to commencing construction or site preparation, the School District shall request a pre - application meeting with the County. The County will schedule a pre - application meeting with the School District within three (3) weeks of a request being submitted to the County. (1) The County will review the development proposal for compliance with the Letter of Consistency required in Section 4.A of this Agreement. (2) The parties will discuss and enter into a written agreement as to the timing and location and the entity or entities responsible for the cost, construction, operation and maintenance of the required offsite improvements. Any requirement that the BCC approve this written agreement at a public hearing is not a prerequisite to the School Board's ability to proceed with any County review that may be necessary under this Agreement. E. At least 120 days before commencing construction or site preparation, the School Board shall submit the SBR plan for the proposed Educational Plant or Ancillary Plant to the County for SBR approval. 1 (1) The County shall have 14 days to determine whether the submittal is complete and sufficient. If the application package is not sufficient for review, the County will request additional information from the School District. 19 40 (2) Once the application package is sufficient, the County shall have 90 days to complete the review and issue a Letter of Compliance. The 90 days may be extended upon agreement of the County and School District Once an affirmative determination has been rendered, the School District may obtain building permits and commence construction. (3) Failure by the County to issue a Letter of Compliance within 90 days after determining the application package sufficient for review shall be considered an approval. However, if within 90 days, the County denies the application based on non- compliance with the relevant standards of this Agreement, the SBR shall be considered denied and the School District shall be authorized to pursue an appeal. F. Letter of Compliance: After the expedited review and the County's determination of compliance with the terms of this Interlocal Agreement, the Planning Services Director, or his designee, shall issue a Letter of Compliance, which shall evidence the County's approval of the SBR In the event that there is disagreement as to the School District's compliance with any site plan requirement set forth in this Agreement, the Planning Services Director shall, at the request of the School District Superintendent's designee, provide the County's determination and the basis of it in writing to the Superintendent's designee. Absent further successful negotiation on the issues, the School District shall be authorized to appeal the decision of the Planning Services Director as described in Section 7 of this Agreement. G. The parties agree that the School District shall not request reviews and that County review is not requested or required for: (1) The placement of temporary or portable classroom facilities; or (2) Proposed renovation or construction on existing school sites, with the exception of construction that: (a) changes the primary use of a facility, (b) includes a stadium, (c) results in a greater that five percent (5 %) increase in K- 12 student capacity, or (d) encroaches upon the established setbacks as set forth in this Agreement H. Should the School Board place temporary or portable classrooms on a site, the School Board will supply additional data to the Fire Code Office for review pursuant. to Rule 4A -58, Florida Administrative Code. In addition, the School Board will supply the Public Utilities Division with additional data on temporary and portable classroom facilities relative to concurrency issues related to water and sewer capacity and to the proper 20 sizing of water meters and grease traps. No other reviews will be required for temporary or portable classroom facilities. I. SBR and Consistency Review Fees: The County will develop a review fee for the processing of the SBR and Consistency Review applications submitted by the School Board The School Board will pay standard County review fees for all other related project review services. 7. APPEAL: In the event that the County denies the application based on non- compliance with relevant standards of this Agreement, or in the event the Superintendent's designee and the Planning Services Director disagree regarding the interpretation of this Agreement, the School District may request an appeal to the BCC. However, appeals regarding issues pertaining to the Fin Code will be made to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments under the established procedures for this Board. A request for appeal shall be filed in writing with the Planning Services Director. Such request shall state the basis for the appeal and shall include any pertinent information, exhibits and other backup information in support of the appeal. The BCC shall hold an advertised public hearing on the appeal and shall consider the decision of the Planning Services Director, the position of the School District and public testimony. In the event that the BCC upholds the decision of the Planning Services Director, the School District shall then be authorized to pursue any legally available action or remedy to resolve this matter. In the event that the BCC upholds the position of the School District, the BCC shall direct the Planning Services Director, or his designee, to issue a Letter of Compliance that is consistent with the findings and conclusions made by the BCC at the appeal hearing. S. The County will initiate an amendment to the Land Development Code to exempt Ancillary Plant conditional use approvals from expiration, as long as the Plant is listed on the School Board Capital Outlay Plan from the time the conditional use is granted until the property is developed. 9. Any GMP amendments that the County is required to consider pursuant to this Agreement shall be initiated in the next available amendment cycle. Any MC amendment that the County is required to consider pursuant to this Agreement shall be initiated in the third LDC amendment cycle in 2003. Exceptions to this time line are for sites that may be impacted by the Rural Fringe GMP amendments, as noted in subsection 3.E.(2) of this Agreement, and FLIIM or Map Series amendments for sites yet to be acquired by the School Board. 10. As set forth in the preamble to this Agreement, the purpose of this Interlocal Agreement is to meet the intent and requirements of Section 1913.33, Florida Statutes. In the event that Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes, is amended or repealed to delete or exempt the coordination of public educational facilities construction with local government comprehensive plans and implementing land development regulations, then notwithstanding the term of this Agreement set forth below, this Agreement shall become null and void 1 11. This Agreement replaces and supersedes the 1996 Interlocal Agreement defined herein. With such replacement, it is understood and agreed by the parties that the School Board has agreed to replace the 1996 Interlocal Agreement process with 21 4 3 the expedited and abbreviated Consistency Review and SBR process based upon the good faith representations of the County in pursuing and implementing the GMT amendments and the LDC amendments contemplated in this Agreement. 12. Should any GMT amendment or LDC amendment required to be initiated under this Agreement fail to obtain the required approval by the BCC, then the parties shall renegotiate the provisions related to the failed amendment. The renegotiation of such amendment only affects the validity of that portion of the agreement related to the failed amendment, and the remainder of the Agreement remains in full force and effect 13. Between the effective date of this Agreement and the effective date of any GMP amendments or implementing LDC amendments that are not dependent upon the adoption of the GMT Amendments, any of which are required to be initiated or considered by the County under this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control, to the extent that the Agreement is not inconsistent with the current GNP. The parties understand that this provision's intent is to follow the procedures set forth in this Agreement, such as the consistency review process, the School Board Review process, and the determination of zoning based on the Agreement so long as the property is deemed an allowable use in the GMT, regardless of the current LDC provisions, except as limited by the PUD provisions of this Agreement. This provision is supported by the zoning in progress rule as set forth in Smith v_ City of Clearwater, 383 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA.1980). 14. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of six years; provided, however, both parties agree that this Agreement shall be reviewed and, if necessary, updated every two (2) years. 15. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument and be the Agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized officials on the dates set forth below. ATTEST: s DWIG$; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAIR 22 40 V Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David Weige Attorney J� ATTEST: By: Dr. H. Be Marlin, Superintendent Date: 4047651 PI COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 23 i Chapter 9J =5 Florida Administrative Code Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance Effective March 21, 1999 Tahlp of rnmmn►c 9J-5.001 Purpose ................................................................................................ ..............................3 9J -5.002 Administration ...................................................................................... ..............................3 9J-5.003 Definitions ............................................................................................ ..............................5 9J-5.004 Public Participation ............................................................................ .............................13 9J -5.005 General Requirements ....................................................................... .............................13 9J- 5.0053 Evaluation and Appraisal Reports and Evaluation and Appraisal Amendments .....17 9J- 5.0055 Concurrency Management System ................................................. .............................19 9J- 5.0057 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas ......................... .............................25 9J-5.006 Future Land Use Element .................................................................. .............................25 9J -5.007 Traffic Circulation Element ................................................................ .............................31 9J-5.008 Mass Transit Element ......................................................................... .............................31 9J -5.009 Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities Element .............................. .............................31 9J -5.010 Housing Element ................................................................................ .............................31 9J -5.011 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element .................................................. .............................34 9J -5.012 Coastal Management .......................................................................... .............................36 9J-5.013 Conservation Element ....................................................................... .............................40 9J-5.014 Recreation and Open Space ............................................................. .............................41 9J -5.015 Intergovernmental Coordination Element ....................................... .............................41 9J-5.016 Capital Improvements Element ......................................................... .............................43 9J-5.018 Optional Elements .............................................................................. .............................45 9J-5.019 Transportation Element ..................................................................... .............................46 9J -5.021 Consistency of Local Government Comprehensive Plans With Comprehensive Regional Policy Plans and With the State Comprehensive Plan ............ .............................49 9J -5.022 Standards for Review of Required Land Development Regulations ........................49 9J -5.023 Criteria for Determining Consistency of Land Development Regulations with the ComprehensivePlan ................................................................................... .............................50 9J -5.025 Public School Facilities Element for Public School Concurrency .............................51 2 9J -5.001 Purpose. (1) This Chapter establishes minimum criteria for the preparation, review, and determination of compliance of comprehensive plans and plan amendments pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Stat- utes. This Chapter establishes criteria implementing the legislative mandate that local comprehensive plans be consistent with the appropriate strategic regional policy plan and the State Comprehensive Plan, and recognizes the major role that local government will play, in accor- dance with that mandate, in accomplishing the goals and policies of the appropriate comprehensive regional policy plan and the State Comprehensive Plan. (2) Rule 9J -5.002 contains general guidelines for the exercise of the Department's authority under law to re- view comprehensive plans and plan amendments for compliance. (3) Rule 9J -5.003 contains definitions of important terms used in this chapter. (4) Rule 9J -5.004 generally prescribes the contents of the public participation procedures to be adopted and enforced by each local government. (5) Rule 9J -5.005 contains general format requirements and other requirements applicable to the data, analy- ses, goals, objectives and policies in the elements of the plan, and the procedural aspects of plan and plan amendment adoption. (6) Rule 9J- 5.0053 establishes the minimum criteria for the evaluation and appraisal reports. (7) Rule 9J- 5.0055 establishes the minimum criteria to ensure the availability of public facilities and services concurrent with the impacts of development. (8) Rules 9J -5.006 through 9J -5.019 establish minimum criteria for comprehensive plan elements. The basic for- mat of the criteria for each element requires the identifi- cation of available data, analyses of such data, and prepa- ration of goals, objectives and policies supported by that data and analysis to accomplish desired ends. The goals, objectives and policies of each element must be consis- tent with the future conditions maps, and the future con- ditions maps must reflect the goals, objectives and poli- cies of each element. (9) Rules 9J- 5.022, 9J -5.023 and 9J -5.024 establish the standards, procedures and criteria for the review of the required land development regulations and determina- tion of their consistency with the comprehensive plan. 9J -5.001 Purpose 9J -5.002 Administration (10) Rules 9J -5.022 through 9J -5.024 establish proce- dures and criteria forthe review of land development regu- lations pursuant to the Local Government Comprehen- sive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S., and Chapters 9J -5 and 9J -12, F.A.C. It specifies the standards the Department will use in determining whether a local government has totally failed to adopt one or more of the land development regu- lations required by Subsection 163.3202(2). It specifies procedures to initiate and control the administrative re- view of land development regulations by substantially affected persons, local governments and the Department. It specifies the criteria for determining consistency of the land development regulations with the comprehen- sive plan. Local governments may adopt land develop- ment regulations which exceed, or are more stringent than, the regulations described in this chapter. (11) As minimum criteria, these criteria are not intended to prohibit a local governmentfrom proposing, consider- ing, adopting, enforcing, or in any other way administer- ing a comprehensive plan which is more specific, de- tailed, or strict, or which covers additional subject ar- eas, whether within required or optional elements, as long as the comprehensive plan is in compliance with Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C., Chapter 163, F.S., and any other applicable statutes, laws or rules. (12) When a federal, state or regional agency has imple- mented a permitting program, the state land planning agency shall not require a local government to duplicate or exceed that permitting program in its comprehensive plan or to implement such a permitting program in its land development regulations. Nothing in this paragraph shall prohibit the state land planning agency, in con- ducting its review of local plans or plan amendments, from making either objections, recommendations, and comments or compliance determinations regarding den- sities and intensities consistent with the Act. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3161, 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3194 FS. History—New 3-6-86, Amended 10- 20 -86, 11-22- 89,4 -2- 92, 3- 23 -94, 5- 18 -94, 3- 21.99. 9J -5.002 Administration. (1) Compliance Determination. The Department shall determine a comprehensive plan or plan amendment to be in compliance if the comprehensive plan or plan amendment is consistent with sections 163.3177, 163.3178, and 163.3191, Florida Statutes, the appropri- ate comprehensive regional policy plan, the State Com- prehensive Plan and this Chapter. (2) Application of Chapter 9J -5. Due to the varying com- plexities, sizes, growth rates and other factors associ- ated with local governments in Florida, the Department shall consider the following factors as it provides assis- tance to local governments and applies this Chapter in specific situations with regard to the detail of the data, analyses, and the content of the goals, objectives, poli- cies, and other graphic or textual standards required: (a) The local government's existing and projected population and rate of population growth. (b) The geography and size of the local government's jurisdiction, and the extent or existence of undevel- opedland. (c) The existence of natural resource features such as groundwater recharge areas, waterwells, wet- lands, wildlife habitat, coastal areas, areas subject to coastal flooding, and living marine resources. (d) The scale of public services the local govern- ment provides or is projected to provide as it relates tothe level of capital improvements planning required. (e) The planning and implementation resources of the local government, and associated local and re- gional institutions. (f) The extent of county charter provisions, special or local acts, or intergovernmental agreements which affect the local government's planning activities. (g) Whether the local government is complying with the evaluation and appraisal requirements in Sub- section 163.3191 (2), Florida Statutes, at the same time that it is revising its plan pursuant to Subsec- tion 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes. (h) Whether the provision at issue constitutes sub- stantial progress over existing provisions regarding consistency with and furtherance of Chapter 163, Part Il, the State Comprehensive Plan, the strategic regional policy plan, and this Chapter, where the ex- isting provisions are in a plan or plan amendment previously found in compliance. (3) Coastal Resource Plan Consistency. In administer- ing these rules the Department shall also establish pro- cedures for determining consistency of coastal manage- ment elements with coastal resource plans prepared and adopted pursuant to general or special law. (4) Technical Assistance; Additional Aid for Rural Ar- eas. 4 9.45_n09 di►minicfr�finn (a) The Department and all other appropriate state and regional agencies shall render technical assis- tance and commit any available resources to aiding local governments in their compliance with the pro- visions of these rules. To this end, the Department shall issue publications, hold conferences, work- shops and seminars, and offer individualized techni- cal assistance to each local government to aid its efforts to satisfy its obligations and desires at the transmittal and adoption stages for plans and plan amendments. Assistance shall also be made avail- able to other interested persons. The Department shall exercise maximum flexibility and cooperation in rendering this assistance, while still carrying out its statutory responsibilities. (b) The Department recognizes the need for wise economic development in rural jurisdictions. Accord- ingly, the Department shall endeavor to render a high degree of technical assistance to local governments with limited resources, including rural counties and municipalities which are attempting to implement one or more of the growth management strategies for rural areas in this chapter, including assistance with respect to cost and availability of infrastructure, economic development strategies, evaluation of ef- fects on tax base, and efficient and effective han- dling of development applications. (5) Federal Coordination with Comprehensive Plans. The Department shall assist in coordinating with federal agen- cies to encourage federal programs and regulatory ac- tivities to be consistent with local government compre- hensive plans found to be in compliance with these rules. This assistance shall focus on areas where there are major federal land holdings such as military bases and national parks. (6) Settlement of Conflicts Through Compliance Agree- ments. The Department shall attempt to resolve con- flicts through informal dispute resolution processes in the administration of this chapter. (a) Any memorandums, correspondence, notices of meeting and minutes of meetings related to the settlement negotiations shall be maintained by the local government and the Department in a file avail- able to the public, excluding documents exempt from production under Chapter 119, F.S. (b) The Department may choose to enter into partial compliance agreements which cover fewer than all of the issues raised in the statement of intent for plans or plan amendments. To participate in this method, a local government must stipulate that the settled parts of the plan are not in compliance, agree to the remedial actions set forth in the agreement, and adopt a remedial plan amendment delaying the effective date of the amendment if requested by the Department, or must otherwise provide assurance that the procedural and substantive rights of all par- ties are preserved. The Department shall also stipu- late that it will recommend that no sanctions be im- posed by the Administration Commission for the stipulated provisions if the remedial amendments are adopted in a timely fashion. (c) No compliance agreement, or portion of a com- pliance agreement, is binding on the Department, a local government, or any other parry until reduced to writing and executed by the proper representative of each party. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to prevent any parry from making any stipu- lations of law or fact by counsel or other authorized representative in any administrative proceeding. (d) Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit the use of other informal settlement meth- ods, or the use of informal settlement methods as part of the compliance agreement process. Local governments and other parties are encouraged to investigate other techniques for the settlement of disputes underthis chapter. Specifically, the Depart- ment endorses the conflict resolution opportunities made available by the regional planning councils and other state agencies or institutions, including the Florida Growth Management Conflict Resolution Con- sortium. Nothing in this subsection shall be con- strued to require that any party settle any proceed- ing. The resolution of any issue through any infor- mal conflict resolution method shall not alter any person's or governing body's right to an administra- tive orjudicial determination of any issue if that per- son or governing body is entitled to such a determi- nation under law. (7) Plan Amendment Submittal Requirements. Submit- tal requirements for plan amendments are as set forth in Chapter 163, Part Il, F.S., and Chapter 9J -11, Florida Administrative Code. (8) Effect of Rule Amendments. No amendment to this chapter shall have the effect of causing plans or plan amendments which were adopted prior to the effective date of the amendment to become not in compliance. Minimum criteria contained in any amendment to this chapter shall be addressed in the first subsequent trans- mitted plan amendment which is directly related to or requires the application of those criteria. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3194 FS. History—New 3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,5-18-94. 9J -5.003 Definitions 9J -5.003 Definitions. As used in this rule chapter, the terms defined in Sec- tion 163.3164, F.S., shall have the meanings provided in that section. In addition, the following definitions are pro- vided to clarify terms used in this rule chapter and not to establish or limit regulatory authority of other agencies or programs; however, local governments may choose alternative definitions which the Department shall review to determine whether such definitions accomplish the intent of both this rule chapter and of Chapter 163, Part ll, F.S. The use of definitions in this rule which were adopted by rule amendment shall not have the effect of rendering not in compliance a plan or plan amendment adopted prior to the effective date of the rule amend- ment, nor of changing definitions of terms used in a plan or plan amendment adopted prior to the effective date of the rule amendment. (1) "Affordable housing" means housing for which monthly rents or monthly mortgage payments, including taxes, insurance, and utilities, do not exceed 30 percent of that amount which represents the percentage of the median adjusted gross annual income for the households or per- sons indicated in Section 420.0004, F.S. Affordable hous- ing definitions that are prescribed by other affordable housing programs administered by either the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or the State of Florida may be used by local govern- ments if such programs are implemented by the local government to provide affordable housing. (2) "Agricultural uses" means activities within land areas which are predominantly used for the cultivation of crops and livestock including: cropland; pastureland; orchards; vineyards; nurseries; ornamental horticulture areas; groves; confined feeding operations; specialty farms; and silviculture areas. (3) "Airport clear zone" means a designated area of land which is subject to peak aircraft noise and on which there is the highest potential of danger from airport op- erations. (4) "Airport facility" means any area of land or water im- proved, maintained or operated by a governmental agency for the landing and takeoff of aircraft, or privately owned paved runways of 4,000 or more feet in length, and any appurtenant area which is used for airport buildings, or other airport facilities or rights -of -way. (5) "Airport obstruction" means any structure, object of natural growth, existing condition, or use of land which obstructs the airspace required for the flight of aircraft in landing or taking off at an airport or which otherwise in- creases the risk of dangerto aircraft operations. (6) "Amendment" means any action of a local govern - mentwhich has the effect of amending, adding to, delet- ing from or changing an adopted comprehensive plan element or map or map series, including an action af- fecting a prior plan or plan amendment adoption ordi- nance, but shall not mean a legislative act which only codifies local legislation or makes corrections, updates and modifications of the capital improvements element concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of fa- cilities or facility construction dates consistent with the plan as provided in Subsection 163.3177(3)(b), F.S., and corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs in otherelements, as provided in Subsection 163.3187(2), F.S. Throughout this chapter, references to a plan or comprehensive plan shall also be deemed to refer to a plan amendment. (7) "Areas subject to coastal flooding' means the areas delineated by the regional or local Hurricane Evacuation Plan as requiring evacuation. (8) "Arterial road" means a roadway providing service which is relatively continuous and of relatively high traffic vol- ume, long trip length, and high operating speed. In addi- tion, every United States numbered highway is an arte- rial road. (9) "Beach" means the zone of unconsolidated material that extends landward from the mean low water line to the place where there is marked change in material or physiographic form, or to the line of permanent vegeta- tion, usually the effective limit of storm waves. "Beach," as used in the coastal management element require- ments, is limited to oceanic and estuarine shorelines. (10) "Bicycle and pedestrian ways" means any road, path or way which is open to bicycle travel and traffic afoot and from which motor vehicles are excluded. (11) "Capital budget" means the portion of each local government's budget which reflects capital improvements scheduled for a fiscal year. (12) "Capital improvement" means physical assets con- structed or purchased to provide, improve or replace a public facility and which are large scale and high in cost. The cost of a capital improvement is generally nonrecur- ring and may require multi -year financing. For the pur- poses of this rule, physical assets which have been iden- tified as existing or projected needs in the individual com- prehensive plan elements shall be considered capital improvements. (13) "Central Business District" means a compact urban core area of a municipality or unincorporated urbanized area which serves as the primary center for economic activity in the jurisdiction. o_i -c nno (14) "Clustering" means the grouping together of struc- tures and infrastructure on a portion of a development site. (15) "Coastal area" means the 35 coastal counties and all coastal municipalities within their boundaries desig- nated by the state land planning agency. These local governments are listed in the document entitled "Local Governments Required to Include Coastal Management Elements in Their Comprehensive Plans," dated July 1, 1986, and available from the Department upon request. The local governments listed in the document and any other communities that incorporate subsequent to July 1, 1986, and meet the criteria in Section 380.24, F.S., shall also be included in the coastal area. (16) "Coastal barriers" means barrier islands, spits, pen- insulas, or similar landforms, including the Florida Keys, which front on the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, or Straits of Florida and which separate estuaries or har- bors from the open waters of the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, or Straits of Florida. (17) "Coastal high hazard areas" (also "high- hazard coastal areas ") means the evacuation zone for a Cat- egory 1 hurricane as established in the regional hurri- cane evacuation study applicable to the local govern- ment. (18) "Coastal planning area" shall be an area of the local government's choosing when preparing and implement- ing all requirements of the coastal management element (except those requirements relating to hurricane evacu- ation, hazard mitigation, water quality, water quantity, estuarine pollution, or estuarine environmental quality); however, this area must encompass all of the following where they occur within the local government's jurisdic- tion: water and submerged lands of oceanic water bod- ies or estuarine water bodies; shorelines adjacent to oceanic waters or estuaries; coastal barriers; living ma- rine resources; marine wetlands; water-dependentfacili- ties or water - related facilities on oceanic or estuarine waters; or public access facilities to oceanic beaches or estuarine shorelines; and all lands adjacent to such oc- currences where development activities would impact the integrity or quality of the above. When preparing and implementing the hurricane evacuation or hazard mitiga- tion requirements of the coastal management element, the coastal planning area shall be those portions of the local government's jurisdiction which lie in the hurricane vulnerability zone. When preparing and implementing the requirements of the coastal management element con- cerning water quality, water quantity, estuarine pollution, or estuarine environmental quality, the coastal planning area shall be all occurrences within the local government's jurisdiction of oceanic waters or estuarine waters. (19) "Coastal or shore protection structures" means shore - hardening structures, such as seawalls, bulkheads, re- vetments, rubblemound structures, groins, breakwaters, and aggregates of materials other than natural beach sand used for beach or shore protection and other struc- tures which are intended to prevent erosion or protect other structures from wave and hydrodynamic forces in- cluding beach and dune restoration. (20) "Collector road" means a roadway providing service which is of relatively moderate traffic volume, moderate trip length, and moderate operating speed. Collector roads collect and distribute traffic between local roads or arterial roads. (21) "Commercial uses" means activities within land ar- eas which are predominantly connected with the sale, rental and distribution of products, or performance of services. (22) "Community park" means a park located near major roadways, and designed to serve the needs of more than one neighborhood. (23) "Compatibility" means a condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indi- rectly by another use or condition. (24) "Composition" means the make up of various land uses by types, extent, intensity, density, or otherwise, which are included in a development or land use cat- egory. (25) "Concurrency" means thatthe necessary public fa- cilities and services to maintain the adopted level of ser- vice standards are available when the impacts of devel- opment occur. (26) "Concurrency Management System" means the pro- cedures and /or process that the local government will utilize to assure that development orders and permits are not issued unless the necessary facilities and ser- vices are available concurrent with the impacts of devel- opment. (27) "Cone of influence" means an area around one or more major waterwells the boundary of which is deter- mined by the government agency having specific statu- tory authority to make such a determination based on groundwater travel or drawdown depth. (28) "Conservation uses" means activities or conditions within land areas designated forthe purpose of conserv- ing or protecting natural resources or environmental qual- ity, including areas designated for such purposes as flood 9J -5.003 Definitions control, protection of quality or quantity of groundwater or surface water, floodplain management, commercially or recreationally valuable fish and shellfish, or protection of vegetative communities or wildlife habitats. (29) "Currently available revenue sources" means an ex- isting source and amount of revenue presently available to the local government. It does not include a local government's present intent to increase the future level or amount of a revenue source which is contingent on ratification by public referendum. (30) "Deepwater ports" means the ports identified in Sub- section 403.021(9), F.S., including Jacksonville, Tampa, Port Everglades, Miami, Port Canaveral, Ft. Pierce, Palm Beach, Port Manatee, Port St. Joe, Panama City, St. Petersburg, and Pensacola. (31) "Density" means an objective measurement of the number of people or residential units allowed per unit of land, such as residents or employees per acre. (32) "Department" or "agency" means the Florida De- partment of Community Affairs. (33) "Development controls" means standards in the com- prehensive plan which control the development or use of land and which are in addition to the densities, intensi- ties, and uses assigned to land by the future conditions maps. (34) "Distribution" means the spatial array of land uses throughout an area. (35) "Drainage basin" or "stormwater basin" means the area defined by topographic boundaries which contrib- utes stormwater to a watershed, drainage system, es- tuarine waters, or oceanic waters, including all areas artificially added to the basin. (36) "Drainage detention structure" means a structure which collects and temporarily stores stormwater for the purpose of treatment through physical, chemical, or bio- logical processes with subsequent gradual release of the stormwater. (37) "Drainage facilities or stormwater managementfa- cilities" means a system of man -made structures de- signed to collect, convey, hold, divert or discharge stormwater, and includes stormwater sewers, canals, detention structures, and retention structures. (38) "Drainage retention structure" means a structure designed to collect and prevent the release of a given volume of stormwater by complete on -site storage. (39) "Dune" means a mound or ridge of loose sediments, usually sand -sized sediments, lying landward of the beach and extending inland to the landward toe of the dune which intercepts the 100 -year storm surge. (40) "Educational uses' means activities and facilities of public or private primary or secondary schools, voca- tional and technical schools, and colleges and universi- ties licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational facilities or parking. (41) "Environmentally sensitive lands" means areas of land or water which are determined necessary by the local government, based on locally determined criteria, to conserve or protect natural habitats and ecological systems. Nothing in this definition shall be construed to prohibit silvicultural operations which employ the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs Best Management Practices as revised in 1993. (42) "Estuary" means a semi - enclosed, naturally exist- ing coastal body of water in which saltwater is naturally diluted by freshwater and which has a connection with oceanic waters, including bays, embayments, lagoons, sounds and tidal streams. (43) "Evacuation routes" means routes designated by county civil defense authorities or the regional evacua- tion plan for the movement of persons to safety in the event of a hurricane. (44) "Evaluation and appraisal report" means an evalua- tion and appraisal report as adopted by the local govern- ing body in accordance with the requirements of Section 163.3191, F.S. (45) "Extent' means the amount of development, includ- ing the area or size in acres. (46) "Facility availability" means whether or not a facility is available in a manner to satisfy the concurrency man- agement system. (47) "Flood plains' means areas inundated during a 100 - yearflood event or identified by the National Flood Insur- ance Program as an A Zone or V Zone on Flood Insur- ance Rate Maps or Flood Hazard Boundary Maps. (48) "Floodprone areas' means areas inundated during a 100 -year flood event or areas identified by the National Flood Insurance Program as an A Zone on Flood Insur- ance Rate Maps or Flood Hazard Boundary Maps. (49) "Foster care facility" means a facility which houses foster residents and provides a family living environment for the residents, including such supervision and care as a /_C Ann may be necessary to meet the physical, emotional and social needs of the residents and serving either children or adult foster residents. (50) "Functional relationship" means a complementary and interactive relationship among land uses or develop- ment, including at a minimum a substantial and positive exchange of human interaction, goods, resources, insti- tutions, services, jobs or workers between land uses or developments. (51) "Goal' means the long -term end toward which pro- grams or activities are ultimately directed. (52) "Group home' means afacility which provides a liv- ing environment for unrelated residents who operate as the functional equivalent of a family, including such su- pervision and care as may be necessary to meet the physical, emotional and social needs of the residents. Adult congregate living facilities comparable in size to group homes are included in this definition. It shall not include rooming or boarding homes, clubs, fraternities, sororities, monasteries or convents, hotels, residential treatment facilities, nursing homes, or emergency shel- ters. (53) "Hazardous waste" means solid waste, or a combi- nation of solid wastes, which, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious char- acteristics, may cause, or significantly contribute to, an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irrevers- ible or incapacitating reversible illness or may pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly transported, disposed of, stored, treated or otherwise managed. (54) "Historic resources' means all areas, districts or sites containing properties listed on the Florida Master Site File, the National Register of Historic Places, or designated by a local government as historically, archi- tecturally, or archaeologically significant. (55) "Hurricane shelter' means a structure designated by local officials as a place of safe refuge during a storm or hurricane. (56) "Hurricane vulnerability zone' (also "areas subject to coastal flooding ") means the areas delineated by the regional or local hurricane evacuation plan as requiring evacuation. The hurricane vulnerability zone shall include areas requiring evacuation in the event of a 100 -year storm or Category 3 storm event. (57) "Industrial uses' means the activities within land areas predominantly connected with manufacturing, as- sembly, processing, or storage of products. (58) "Infrastructure" means those man -made structures which serve the common needs of the population, such as: sewage disposal systems; potable water systems; potable water wells serving a system; solid waste dis- posal sites or retention areas; stormwater systems; utili- ties; piers; docks; wharves; breakwaters; bulkheads; seawalls; bulwarks; revetments; causeways; marinas; navigation channels; bridges; and roadways. (59) "Intensity" means an objective measurement of the extent to which land may be developed or used, includ- ing the consumption or use of the space above, on or below ground; the measurement of the use of or demand on natural resources; and the measurement of the use of or demand on facilities and services. (60) "Interagency hazard mitigation report" means the recommendations of a team of federal, state, regional, or local officials which address measures to reduce the potential for future flood losses and which is prepared in response to a Presidential Disaster Declaration. (61) "Level of service" means an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by a facility based on and related to the operational char- acteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. (62) "Limited access facility" means a roadway espe- cially designed for through traffic, and over, from, or to which owners or occupants of abutting land or other per- sons have no greater than a limited right or easement of access. (63) "Living marine resources" means oceanic or estua- rine plants or animals, such as mangroves, seagrasses, algae, coral reefs, and living marine habitat; fish, shell- fish, crustacea and fisheries; and sea turtles and marine mammals. (64) "Local peacetime emergency plan" means the plans prepared by the county civil defense or county emer- gency management agency addressing weather - related natural hazards and man -made disasters except nuclear power plant accidents and war. The plan covers hazard mitigation, emergency preparedness, emergency re- sponse, emergency recovery and in coastal counties, hurricane evacuation. (65) "Local road" means a roadway providing servicewhich is of relatively low traffic volume, short average trip length or minimal through traffic movements, and high volume land access for abutting property. (66) "Low income household" has the meaning provided in Section 420.0004, F.S. 9J -5.003 Definitions (67) "Major trip generators or attractors" means concen- trated areas of intense land use or activity that produces or attracts a significant number of local trip ends. (68) "Manufactured home" means a residential manufac- tured home meeting the definition in Section 320.01, F.S. (69) "Marine habitat" means areas where living marine resources naturally occur, such as mangroves, seagrass beds, algal beds, salt marshes, transitional wetlands, marine wetlands, rocky shore communities, hard bot- tom communities, oyster bars or flats, mud flats, coral reefs, worm reefs, artificial reefs, offshore springs, nearshore mineral deposits, and offshore sand depos- its. (70) "Marine wetlands" means areas with a water regime determined primarily by tides and the dominant vegeta- tion is salt tolerant plant species including those spe- cies listed in Subsection 17- 4.020(17), F.A.C., "Sub- merged Marine Species." (71) "Minerals" means all solid minerals, including clay, gravel, phosphate rock, lime, shells (excluding live shell- fish), stone, sand, heavy minerals, and any rare earths, which are contained in the soils or waters of the state. (72) "Mobile home" means a structure meeting the defi- nition in Section 320.01, F.S. (73) "Moderate income household" has the meaning pro- vided in Section 420.0004, F.S. (74) "Natural drainage features" means the naturally oc- curring features of an area which accommodate the flow of significant amounts of stormwater, such as streams, rivers, lakes, sloughs, floodplains and wetlands. (75) "Natural drainage flow" means the pattern of surface and storm water drainage through or from a particular site before the construction or installation of improve- ments or prior to regrading. (76) "Natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas" or "natu- ral groundwater recharge areas" or "groundwater recharge areas" means areas contributing to or providing volumes of water which make a contribution to the storage or regional flow of an aquifer. (77) "Natural reservations" means areas designated for conservation purposes, and operated by contractual agreement with or managed by a federal, state, regional or local government or non - profit agency such as: na- tional parks, state parks, lands purchased under the Save Our Coast, Conservation and Recreation Lands or Save Our Rivers programs, sanctuaries, preserves, monu- ments, archaeological sites, historic sites, wildlife man- agement areas, national seashores, and Outstanding Florida Waters. This definition does not include privately owned land managed by a state agency on either a vol- untary or a short-term contractual basis. (78) "Neighborhood park" means a park which serves the population of a neighborhood and is generally ac- cessible by bicycle or pedestrian ways. (79) "New town" means a new urban activity center and community designated on the future land use map and located within a rural area or at the rural -urban fringe, clearly functionally distinct or geographically separated from existing urban areas and other new towns. A new town shall be of sufficient size, population and land use composition to support a variety of economic and social activities consistent with an urban area designation. New towns shall include basic economic activities; all major land use categories, with the possible exception of agri- cultural and industrial; and a centrally provided full range of public facilities and services. A new town shall be based on a master development plan, and shall be bor- dered by land use designations which provide a clear distinction between the new town and surrounding land uses. (80) "Nonpoint source pollution' means any source of water pollution that is not a point source. (81) "Objective" means a specific, measurable, interme- diate end that is achievable and marks progress toward a goal. (82) "Oceanic waters" means waters of the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, or Straits of Florida, excluding estuaries. (83) "Open spaces" means undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation uses. (84) "Park" means a neighborhood, community, or re- gional park. (85) "Partial evaluation and appraisal report" means an evaluation and appraisal report which focuses on selected issues or elements that may only be submitted by a municipality with fewer than 5,000 residents or a county with fewer than 50,000 residents pursuant to a written agreement with the Department and in accordance with the requirements of Section 163.3191(12), F.S. (86) "Pattern" means the form of the physical dispersal of development or land use. A I G AA/f I1 l a_ (88) "Point source pollution" means any source of water pollution that constitutes a discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fis- sure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feed- ing operation, orvessel or otherfloating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture. (89) "Policy" means the way in which programs and ac- tivities are conducted to achieve an identified goal. (90) "Pollution" is the presence in the outdoor atmo- sphere, ground or water of any substances, contami- nants, noise, or manmade or man - induced alteration of the chemical, physical, biological, or radiological integ- rity of air or water, in quantities or at levels which are or may be potentially harmful or injurious to human health or welfare, animal or plant life, or property, or unreason- ably interfere with the enjoyment of life or property. (91) "Port facility" means harbor or shipping improvements used predominantly for commercial purposes including channels, turning basins, jetties, breakwaters, landings, wharves, docks, markets, structures, buildings, piers, storage facilities, plazas, anchorages, utilities, bridges, tunnels, roads, causeways, and all other property or fa- cilities necessary or useful in connection with commer- cial shipping. (92) "Potable water facilities" means a system of struc- tures designed to collect, treat, or distribute potable water, and includes water wells, treatment plants, reser- voirs, and distribution mains. (93) "Potable water wellfield" means the site of one or more water wells which supply potable water for human consumption to a water system which serves at least 15 service connections used by year -round residents or regu- larly serves at least 25 year -round residents. (94) "Private recreation sites" means sites owned by pri- vate, commercial or non - profit entities available to the public for purposes of recreational use. (95) "Proposed evaluation and appraisal report' means a draft evaluation and appraisal report prepared by the lo- cal planning agency that is transmitted to the local gov- erning bodyfor review and adoption. (96) "Public access" means the ability of the public to physically reach, enter or use recreation sites including beaches and shores. (87) "Playground" means a recreation area with play ap- (97) "Public recreation sites" means sites owned or leased paratus. on a long -term basis by a federal, state, regional or local government agency for purposes of recreational use. 10 (98) "Public buildings and grounds" means structures or lands that are owned, leased, or operated by a govern- ment entity, such as civic and community centers, hos- pitals, libraries, police stations, fire stations, and gov- ernment administration buildings. (99) "Public facilities and services" which must be made available concurrent with the impacts of development means those covered by comprehensive plan elements required by Section 163.3177, F.S., and for which level of service standards must be adopted under Chapter 9J- 5, F.A.C. The public facilities and services are: roads, Rule 9J- 5.0071(3)(c)1.; sanitary sewer, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.a.; solid waste, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.b.; stormwater, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.c.; potable water, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.d.; parks and recreation, Rule 9J- 5.014(3)(c)4.; and mass transit, Rule 9J- 5.0071(3)(c)1., if applicable. (100) "Public Transit" means passenger services pro- vided by public, private or non - profit entities such as the following surface transit modes: commuter rail, rail rapid transit, light rail transit, light guideway transit, express bus. and local fixed route bus. (101) "Purchase of development rights" means the ac- quisition of a governmentally recognized rightto develop land which is severed from the realty and held orfurther conveyed by the purchaser. (102) "Recreation" means the pursuit of leisure time ac- tivities occurring in an indoor or outdoor setting. (103) "Recreation facility" means a component of a rec- reation site used by the public such as a trail, court, athletic field or swimming pool. (104) "Recreational uses" means activities within areas where recreation occurs. (105) "Regional park" means a park which is designed to serve two or more communities. (106) "Relocation housing" means those dwellings which are made available to families displaced by public pro- grams, provided that such dwellings are decent, safe and sanitary and within the financial means of the fami- lies or individuals displaced. (107) "Resident population" means inhabitants counted in the same manner utilized by the United States Bu- reau of the Census, in the category of total population. Resident population does not include seasonal popula- tion. (108) "Residential uses" means activities within land ar- eas used predominantly for housing. 9J -5.003 Definitions (109) "Right -of -way" means land in which the state, a county, or a municipality owns the fee simple title or has an easement dedicated or required for a transportation or utility use. (110) "Roadway functional classification" means the as- signment of roads into categories according to the char- acter of service they provide in relation to the total road network. Basic functional categories include limited ac- cess facilities, arterial roads, and collector roads, which may be subcategorized into principal, major or minor levels. Those levels may be further grouped into urban and rural categories. (111) "Rural areas" means low density areas character- ized by social, economic and institutional activities which may be largely based on agricultural uses or the extrac- tion of natural resources in unprocessed form, or areas containing large proportions of undeveloped, unimproved, or low density property. (112) "Rural village" or "rural activity center" means a small, compact node of development within a rural area con- taining development, uses and activities which are sup- portive of and have a functional relationship with the so- cial, economic and institutional needs of the surround- ing rural areas. (113) "Sanitary sewer facilities" means structures or sys- tems designed for the collection, transmission, treat- ment, or disposal of sewage and includes trunk mains, interceptors, treatment plants and disposal systems. (114) "Sanitary sewer interceptor" means a sewerage conduit which connects directly to, and transmits sew- age to, a treatment plant. (115) "Sanitary sewer trunk main" means a sewerage conduit which connects directly to, and transmits sew- age to, an interceptor. (116) "Seasonal population" means part-time inhabitants who utilize, or may be expected to utilize, public facili- ties or services, but are not residents. Seasonal popula- tion shall include tourists, migrant farmworkers, and other short-term and long -term visitors. (117) "Services" means the programs and employees determined necessary by local government to provide adequate operation and maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure as well as those educational, health care, social and other programs necessary to support the programs, public facilities, and infrastructure set out in the local plan or required by local, state, or federal law. (118) "Shoreline' or "shore" means the interface of land and water and, as used in the coastal management ele- ment requirements, is limited to oceanic and estuarine interfaces. (119) "Solid waste' means sludge from a waste treat- ment works, water supply treatment plant, or air pollu- tion control facility or garbage, rubbish, refuse, or other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from domestic, in- dustrial, commercial, mining, agricultural, or governmental operations. (120) "Solid waste facilities" means structures or sys- tems designed for the collection, processing or disposal of solid wastes, including hazardous wastes, and includes transfer stations, processing plants, recycling plants, and disposal systems. (121) "Solid waste processing plant' means a facility for incineration, resource recovery, or recycling of solid waste prior to its final disposal. (122) "Solid waste transfer station" means a facility for temporary collection of solid waste prior to transport to a processing plant or to final disposal. (123) "Stormwater" means the flow of water which re- sults from a rainfall event. (124) "Stormwater facilities" means manmade structures that are part of a stormwater management system de- signed to collect, convey, hold, divert, or discharge stormwater, and may include stormwater sewers, ca- nals, detention facilities and retention facilities. (125) "Stormwater management system' has the mean- ing described in Rule 17- 40.210(21), F.A.C. (1992). (126) "Sufficiency review" means Department review of an adopted evaluation and appraisal report to determine whether it has been submitted in a timely fashion and whether it contains components in accordance with the prescribed criteria in Section 163.3191, F.S., and this rule chapter. (127) "Support documents" means any surveys, stud- ies, inventory maps, data, inventories, listings or analy- ses used as bases for or in developing the local compre- hensive plan. (128) "Suitability" means the degree to which the exist- ing characteristics and limitations of land and water are compatible with a proposed use or development. (129) "Transfer of development rights" means a govern- mentally recognized right to use or develop land at a 12 certain density, or intensity, or for a particular purpose, which is severed from the realty and placed on some other property. (130) "Transportation demand management' means strat- egies and techniques that can be used to increase the efficiency of the transportation system. Demand man- agement focuses on ways of influencing the amount and demand for transportation by encouraging alternatives to the single- occupant automobile and by altering local peak hour travel demand. These strategies and tech- niques may, among others, include: ridesharing pro- grams, flexible work hours, telecommuting, shuttle ser- vices, and parking management. (131) "Transportation disadvantaged" means those indi- viduals who because of physical or mental disability, in- come status, or age are unable to transport themselves or purchase transportation and are therefore dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employ- ment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life - sustaining activities. (132) "Transportation system management' means im- proving roads, intersections, and other related facilities to make the existing transportation system operate more efficiently. Transportation system management tech- niques include demand management strategies, incident management strategies, and other actions that increase the operating efficiency of the existing system. (133) "Urban area" means an area of or for development characterized by social, economic and institutional ac- tivities which are predominantly based on the manufac- ture, production, distribution, or provision of goods and services in a setting which typically includes residential and nonresidential development uses other than those which are characteristic of rural areas. (134) "Urban sprawl" means urban development or uses which are located in predominantly rural areas, or rural areas interspersed with generally low- intensity or low - density urban uses, and which are characterized by one or more of the following conditions: (a) The premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses; (b) The creation of areas of urban development or uses which are not functionally related to land uses which predomi- nate the adjacent area; or (c) The creation of areas of urban development or uses which fail to maximize the use of existing public facilities orthe use of areas within which public services are currently provided. Urban sprawl is typically manifested in one or more of the following land use or development patterns: Leapfrog or scattered development; ribbon or strip commercial or other devel- opment; or large expanses of predominantly low- inten- sity, low- density, or single -use development. (135) "Vegetative communities' means ecological com- munities, such as coastal strands, oak hammocks, and cypress swamps, which are classified based on the pres- ence of certain soils, vegetation and animals. (136) "Very low- income household" has the meaning pro- vided in Section 420.0004, F.S. (137) "Water- dependent uses' means activities which can be carried out only on, in or adjacent to water areas because the use requires access to the water body for: waterborne transportation including ports or marinas; recreation; electrical generating facilities; or water sup- ply. (138) "Water recharge areas' means land or water areas through which groundwater is replenished. (139) "Water- related uses' means activities which are not directly dependent upon access to a water body, but which provide goods and services that are directly asso- ciated with water - dependent or waterway uses. (140) "Water wells" means wells excavated, drilled, dug, or driven for the supply of industrial, agricultural or po- table water for general public consumption. (141) "Wellhead protection area" means an area desig- nated by local government to provide land use protection for the groundwater source for a potable water welifield, as defined in this rule chapter, including the surface and subsurface area surrounding the wellfield. Differing lev- els of protection may be established within the wellhead protection area commensurate with the capacity of the well and an evaluation of the risk to human health and the environment. Wellhead protection areas shall be delineated using professionally accepted methodologies based on the best available data and taking into account any zone of contribution described in existing data. (142) "Wetlands' as used in this rule chapter has the meaning as defined in Subsection 373.019(22), F.S., and as further described by the delineation methodology in Section 373.4211, F. S. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177, 163.3178 FS. History — New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,11-22-89,4-2- 92, 3- 23 -94, 5- 18 -94, 3- 21 -99. 9J -5.004 Public Participation. (1) The local governing body and the local planning agency shall adopt procedures to provide for and encourage pub- lic participation in the planning process, including con- 9J -5.004 Public Participation 9J -5,005 General Requirements sideration of amendments to the comprehensive plan and evaluation and appraisal reports. (2) The procedures shall include the following: (a) Provisions to assure that real property owners are put on notice, through advertisement in a news- paper of general circulation in the area or other method adopted by the local government, of official actions that will affect the use of their property; (b) Provisions for notice to keep the general public informed; (c) Provisions to assure that there are opportunities for the public to provide written comments; (d) Provisions to assure thatthe required public hear- ings are held; and (e) Provisions to assure the consideration of and response to public comments. (3) Local governments are encouraged to make execu- tive summaries of comprehensive plans available to the general public and should, while the planning process is ongoing, release information at regular intervals to keep its citizenry apprised of planning activities. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(9), (10), 163.3181 FS. History — New3 -6 -86, Amended 10- 20 -86. 9J -5.005 General Requirements. (1) Format Requirements. 13 (a) Each comprehensive plan shall include the con- tent for all elements as required by law and this Chapter; however, related elements may be com- bined. (b) If the local government chooses to combine ele- ments, it shall clearly indicate where in the compre- hensive plan or support documents all statutory re- quirements of Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and the requirements of this Chap- ter are met. The comprehensive plan shall contain an explanation of such combinations. (c) The comprehensive plan shall consist of those items listed below in this paragraph. All other docu- mentation may be considered as support documents. Support documents do not have to be adopted un- less the local government desires to adopt all or part of the support documents as part of the com- prehensive plan. All background data, studies, sur- veys, analyses and inventory maps not adopted as part of the comprehensive plan shall be available for public inspection while the comprehensive plan is being considered for adoption and while it is in ef- fect. Unless a local government desires to include more, the adopted comprehensive plan shall con- sist of: 1. Goals, objectives, and policies 2. Requirements for capital improvements imple- mentation; 3. Procedures for monitoring and evaluation of the local plan; 4. The countywide marina siting plan for partici- pating local governments in the coastal area: 5. Required maps showing future conditions, in- cluding the future land use map or map series; 6. A copy of the local comprehensive plan adop- tion ordinance at such time as the plan is adopted; and 7. Intergovernmental coordination process (d) The comprehensive plan format shall include: 1. A table of contents; 2. Numbered pages; 3. Element headings; 4. Section headings within elements; 5. A list of included tables, maps, and figures; 6. Titles and sources for all included tables, maps, and figures; 7. A preparation date; and 8. Name of the preparer. (e) All maps included in the comprehensive plan shall include major natural and man -made geographic fea- tures, city, county, and state lines, when applicable; and shall contain a legend indicating a north arrow, map scale, and date. (2) Data and Analyses Requirements. 14 9J -5.005 General RamiIramanta (a) All goals, objectives, policies, standards, find- ings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amend- ments and their support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and the analy- ses applicable to each element. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data avail- able on that particular subject at the time of adop- tion of the plan or plan amendment at issue. Data or summaries thereof shall not be subject to the com- pliance review process. However, the Department will review each comprehensive plan forthe purpose of determining whether the plan is based on the data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether the data were collected and applied in a profession- ally acceptable manner. All tables, charts, graphs, maps, figures and data sources, and their limita- tions, shall be clearly described where such data occur in the above documents. Local governments are encouraged to use graphics and othertechniques for making support information more readily useable by the public. (b) This Chapter shall not be construed to require original data collection by local government; how- ever, local governments are encouraged to utilize any original data necessary to update or refine the local government comprehensive plan data base so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. (c) Data are to be taken from professionally accepted existing sources, such as the United States Cen- sus, State Data Center, State University System of Florida, regional planning councils, water manage- ment districts, orexisting technical studies. The data used shall be the best available existing data, un- less the local government desires original data or special studies. Where data augmentation, updates, or special studies or surveys are deemed neces- sary by local government, appropriate methodolo- gies shall be clearly described or referenced and shall meet professionally accepted standards for such methodologies. Among the sources available to local governments are those identified in 'The Guide to Local Comprehensive Planning Data Sources" published by the Department in 1989. Among the sources of data for preliminary identifi- cation of wetland locations are the National Wet- land Inventory Maps prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (d) Primary data sources such as United States Census reports, other government data documents, local computerized data, and original map sheets used to compile required maps need not be printed in their entirety within either the support documents or the comprehensive plan. Summaries of support documents shall be submitted to the Department along with the comprehensive plan at the time of compliance review to aid in the Department's deter- mination of compliance and consistency. As a local alternative to providing data and analyses summa- ries, complete data and analyses sufficient to sup- port the comprehensive plan may be submitted to the Department at the time of compliance review. The Department may require submission of the com- plete or more detailed data or analyses during its compliance review if, in the opinion of the Depart- ment, the summaries are insufficient to determine compliance or consistency of the plan. (e) The comprehensive plan shall be based on resi- dent and seasonal population estimates and projec- tions. Resident and seasonal population estimates and projections shall be either those provided by the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Busi- ness Research, those provided by the Executive Office of the Governor, or shall be generated by the local government. If the local government chooses to base its plan on the figures provided by the Uni- versity of Florida or the Executive Office of the Gov- ernor, medium range projections should be utilized. If the local government chooses to base its plan on either low or high range projections provided by the University of Florida or the Executive Office of the Governor, a detailed description of the rationale for such a choice shall be included with such projec- tions. 1. If the local government chooses to prepare its own estimates and projections, it shall sub- mit estimates and projections and a description of the methodologies utilized to generate the projections and estimates to the Department with its plan when the plan is due for compliance review unless it has submitted them for advance review. If a local government chooses to prepare its own resident and seasonal population esti- mates and projections, it may submit them and a description of the methodology utilized to pre- pare them to the Department prior to the time of compliance review. The Department may request additional information regarding the methodol- ogy utilized to prepare the estimates and pro- jections. 9J -5.005 General the Department shall make available, upon re- quest, beginning on December 1, 1986, ex- amples of methodologies for resident and sea- sonal population estimates and projections that are deemed by the Department to be profes- sionally acceptable. The Department shall be guided by the Executive Office of the Governor, in particular the State Data Center, in its review of any population estimates, projections, or methodologies proposed by local governments. (f) Local governments may submit textual portions of the proposed or adopted comprehensive plan or plan amendment, or their support documents, in the form of electronic processing storage media. A lo- cal government wishing to do this must first verify with the Department that the programs necessary to access the media are available to the Depart- ment and other agencies and, if so, then send one hard copy and clearly labeled storage media copies for distribution to external agencies. (g) A local government may include, as part of its adopted plan, documents adopted by reference but not incorporated verbatim into the plan. The adop- tion by reference must identify the title and author of the document and indicate clearly what provisions and edition of the document is being adopted. The adoption by reference may not include future amend- ments to the document because this would violate the statutory procedure for plan amendments and frustrate public participation on those amendments. A local government may include a provision in its plan stating that all documents adopted by refer- ence are as they existed on a date certain. Docu- ments adopted by reference that are revised subse- quent to plan adoption will need to have their refer- ence updated within the plan through the amend- ment process. Unless documents adopted by refer- ence comply with Rule 9J- 5.005(2)(g), F.A.C., or are in the Florida Statutes, the Florida Administrative Code, orthe Code of Federal Regulations, copies or summaries of the documents shall be submitted as support documents for the adopted portions of the plan amendment. (3) Level of Service Standards. Level of service standards shall be established for ensuring that adequate facility capacity will be provided for future development and for purposes of issuing development orders or development 2. The Department will evaluate the application permits, pursuant to Section 163.3202(2)(g), Florida Stat- of the methodology utilized by a local govern- utes. Each local government shall establish a level of ment in preparing its own population estimates service standard for each public facility located within and projections and determine whether the par- the boundary for which the local government has author - ticular methodology is professionally accepted. ity to issue development orders or development permits. The Department shall provide its findings to the Level of service standards shall be set for each individual local government within sixty days. In addition, facility or facility type and not on a systemwide basis. 15 (4) Planning Timeframe. Each local government com- prehensive plan shall include at least two planning peri- ods: one for at least the first five -year period subsequent to the plan's adoption and one for at least an overall ten - year period. (5) Internal Consistency. (a) The required elements and any optional elements shall be consistent with each other. All elements of a particular comprehensive plan shall follow the same general format (see "Format Requirements "). Where data are relevant to several elements, the same data shall be used, including population estimates and projections. (b) Each map depicting future conditions must re- flect goals, objectives, and policies within all ele- ments and each such map must be contained within the comprehensive plan. (6) Plan Implementation Requirements. Recognizing that the intent of the Legislature is that local government com- prehensive plans are to be implemented, pursuant to Subsection 163.3161(5), and Sections 163.3194, 163.3201, and 163.3202, Florida Statutes, the sections of the comprehensive plan containing goals, objectives, and policies shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, modified or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner. It is not the intent of this Chapter to require the inclusion of imple- menting regulations in the comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land development regulations that will be part of the strat- egy for implementing the comprehensive plan and the goals, objectives, and policies that describe how the pro- grams, activities, and land development regulations will be carried out consistent with Section 163.3201, Florida Statutes. Goals, objectives and policies shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. This Chapter does not mandate the cre- ation, limitation, or elimination of regulatory authority for other agencies nor does it authorize the adoption or re- quire the repeal of any rules, criteria, or standards of any local, regional, or state agency. (7) Monitoring and Evaluation Requirements. For the purpose of evaluating and appraising the implementa- tion of the comprehensive plan, each comprehensive plan and each deepwater port master plan shall contain a section identifying five -year monitoring, updating and evaluation procedures to be followed in the preparation of the required five -year, seven -year, ten -year or twelve - 16 o.i_a nna year evaluation and appraisal reports as described in Rule 9J- 5.0053. That section shall address: (a) A description of the public participation process used by the local government in preparing the re- port; (b) Updating appropriate baseline data and measur- able objectives to be accomplished in the first five - year period of the plan, and for the long -term period; (c) Accomplishments in the first five -year, seven -year, ten -year, or twelve -year reporting period, describing the degree to which the goals, objectives and poli- cies have been successfully reached; (d) Obstacles or problems which resulted in under- achievement of goals, objectives, or policies; (e) New or modified and reformulated goals, objec- tives, or policies needed to correct discovered prob- lems; (f) A means of ensuring continuous monitoring and evaluation of the plan during the five -year period; (g) The extent to which unanticipated and unfore- seen problems and opportunities occurred between the date of adoption and the date of the report; (h) The effect on the comprehensive plan of changes to: Chapter 187, F.S., the state comprehensive plan Chapter 163, Pt. II, F.S.; the minimum criteria con- tained in Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C.; and the appropriate strategic regional policy plan; (i) The major problems of development, physical de- terioration, and the location of land uses and the social and economic effects of such uses in the area; (j) The identification of any actions that are taken or need to be taken to address the planning issues identified in the report; and (k) Proposed or anticipated plan amendments nec- essary to address or implement the identified changes. (8) Procedural Requirements. Comprehensive plans, plan elements, and plan amendments shall be considered, adopted and amended pursuant to the procedural re- quirements of Sections 163.3161 to 163.3215, Florida Statutes, including but not limited to the following: (a) The comprehensive plans for municipalities shall be prepared and submitted within the same timeframes as the counties in which the municipali- ties are located and all plans shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the schedule adopted by the Department pursuant to Subsection 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes; (b) The comprehensive plan or element shall be pre- pared in accordance with Section 163.3174 and Sub- section 163.3167(4), Florida Statutes, relating to local planning agencies. Proposed plans, elements, portions thereof and amendments shall be consid- ered at a public hearing with due public notice by the local planning agency prior to making its recom- mendation to the governing body pursuant to Sub- section 163.3167(4) and Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes; (c) The comprehensive plan, element or amendment shall be considered and adopted in accordance with the procedures relating to public participation adopted by the governing body and the local planning agency pursuant to Section 163.3181, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J -5.004 of this chapter. The local government shall submit with its initial transmittal, pursuant to Subsection 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes, and sub- sequent transmittals pursuant to Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, a copy of the procedures for public participation that have been adopted by the local planning agency and the governing body; (d) The comprehensive plan and any comprehensive plan amendments shall be transmitted after formal action by the governing body in accordance with the provisions of Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes, and the procedural rule adopted by the Department pursuant to Subsection 163.3177(9), Florida Statutes; (e) The comprehensive plan shall not be amended more than two times during any calendar year ex- cept in the case of amendments directly related to developments of regional impact pursuant to Sec- tion 380.05, Florida Statutes, Florida Quality Devel- opments pursuant to Section 380.061, Florida Stat- utes, and small -scale development activities pursu- ant to Paragraph 163.3187(1)(b), Florida Statutes. In order for an amendment to be exempt from the twice -a -year amendment restriction under the de- velopment-of- regional- impact provision, the amend- ment must have been transmitted and adopted as provided by law. The comprehensive plan, elements and amendments shall be adopted by ordinance and only after the public hearings required by Paragraph 163.3184(15)(b), Florida Statutes, have been con- ducted after the notices required by Paragraphs 163.3184(15)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes. Upon adoption the local government shall transmit to the 9J- 5.0053 Evaluation and Appraisal Reports and Evaluation and Appraisal Amendments Department a copy of the ordinance and the required notices; (f) The comprehensive plan shall be evaluated and updated as required by Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, and this chapter. A copy of the adopted report required by Section 163.3191, Florida Stat- utes, shall be transmitted to the Department at the time of the governing body's transmittal of related amendments pursuant to Subsection 163.3191(4), Florida Statutes; and (g) A comprehensive plan, element, or plan amend- ment applicable to a designated area of critical state concern shall not become effective until reviewed and approved as provided in Section 380.05, Florida Statutes, and any rules promulgated pursuant to that section. (h) A comprehensive plan or plan amendment appli- cable to the Wekiva River Protection Area, in addi- tion to meeting the requirements for compliance pursuantto Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, must meet the requirements of Section 369.301, et seq., Florida Statutes, the Wekiva River Protection Act. (i) Local governments may enter into and are en- couraged to enter intojoint planning agreements as provided in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. (9) Recognition of Private Property Rights and Vested Rights. The Department recognizes private property rights created by law and guaranteed by the State and Federal Constitutions and the existence of legitimate and often competing public and private interests in land use regu- lations and other government action. Local governments may include appropriate provisions in their plans for the recognition of statutory and common law vested rights. (10) Duplication of Regulations. When a federal, state, or regional agency has implemented a regulatory pro- gram, the department shall not require a local govern- ment to duplicate that regulatory program in its local comprehensive plan. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3167, 163.3171, 163.3174, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163. 3191, 163.3194 FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,11-22-89,3- 23-94,5- 18 -94, 3- 21 -99. 9J- 5.0053 Evaluation and Appraisal Reports and Evaluation and Appraisal Amendments. 9J- 5.0053 Evaluation and Appraisal Reports a cvaruar.urr anu Appraisal Amendments (1) PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the intent of the Legis- lature that each unit of local government required to adopt b. A summary of all land use text and map a comprehensive plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part ll, F.S., periodically update its comprehensive plan through amendments and all other major text amend - the preparation and adoption of an evaluation and ap- ments made to the plan; c. A new existing land use map and table of praisal report (EAR) and adoption of an evaluation and existing land uses for current conditions as of appraisal report-based plan amendments in accordance the date of the report; with Section 163.3191, F.S. The purpose of the evalua- tion and appraisal report is to assess and evaluate the d. A new existing traffic circulation map; and success or failure of the local government's comprehen- sive plan, including the validity of the projections, the e. A summary of the condition and quality of realization of the goals and objectives, and the imple- all natural resources. mentation of the plan's policies. The report shall also address changes in local conditions, changes in state 3. Comparison of the Plan's Adopted Objectives and regional policies on planning and growth manage- with Actual Results, which shall include com- ment and through adoption of related amendments, to parison of the objectives, including specific and update the local government's comprehensive plan to measurable targets, to the actual results and address the issues raised in the report. conditions. Determine whetherthe objectivewas (2) EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MINIMUM achieved. CRITERIA. 4. Major Problems of Development, Physical De- (a) The evaluation and appraisal report shall include terioration, Location of Land Uses and the So- cial and Economic Effects of the Major Prob- an evaluation and assessment of the success or lems Identified failure of the local government's adopted compre- hensive plan, including the validity of the projections, a. The accuracy and use of the population the realization of the goals and objectives, and the projections; implementation of the plan's policies. The evalua- tion and appraisal report shall also address changes b. Actual vs. anticipated rate of development; in local conditions; the effect on the comprehensive . plan of changes to: the state comprehensive plan, c. The effect of concurrency requirements; Chapter 163, Part ll, Florida Statutes, Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C., and the appropriate strategic regional policy d. The maintenance and /or achievement of plan; changes needed to update the comprehensive adequate Level of Service Standards; plan, elements, or portions thereof; reformulated or additional goals, objectives, policies, maps, sched- e. Coordinating with development of the provi- ules, and procedures; and through adoption of re- sion of public facilities and services; port -based plan amendments, update the local government's comprehensive plan to address the is- I. The actual vs. projected revenues and ex- sues raised in the report; and otherwise address the penditures regarding capital improvements; requirements specified in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, and this Rule Chapter. The report shall g. The generation and status of new revenue contain appropriate statements, including data, sources; analysis and conclusions, using words, maps, illus- trations, schedules, or other graphic formats that h. Physical deterioration of public buildings, address the following: utilities, infrastructure, recreation facilities, and parks, and the need for replacement or reha- 1. Condition of Each Element at the Time of bilitation; Adoption, which shall include summaries of data and analysis from each element of the existing i. Physical deterioration of buildings and struc- adopted plan. tures in the commercial, and industrial land 2. Condition of each element at the Date of Re- use categories; port j. Physical deterioration of the housing stock, ncluding mobile homes; a. Summaries of each element describing current conditions; 18 k. The location of development with regard to existing infrastructure; I. The location of development in relation to where development was anticipated in the adopted plan, such as within areas designated for urban growth; m. The location of development in relation to its compatibility with safety and evacuation in coastal high hazard areas; n. The location of development in relation to the maintenance of environmentally sensitive areas; and o. The social and economic effects of the major problems previously identified by pro- viding a description of the effects. 9J- 5.0055 e. Other actions, such as monitoring and evaluation procedures; and f. Studies to be completed. 8. Identification of Proposed orAnticipated Plan Amendments to Address or Implement the Iden- tified Changes a. Identify proposed or anticipated plan amend- ments; and b. Provide a schedule fortransmittal and adop- tion of the plan amendments identified in the previous section. 9. The Public Participation Process, which shall include a description of the public participation process used in the preparation of the report. 5. Unanticipated and Unforeseen Problems and Specific Authority 163.3177(9), 163.3191(8), (10) FS. Opportunities Which Occurred Since Adoption Law Implemented 163.3187(5), 163.3191 FS. which shall include a description of the unfore- History—New 3-23-94, Amended 5-18-94, 3- 21 -99, seen problems and /or opportunities and their impact on the comprehensive plan. 6. Effect on the Local Comprehensive Plan The report shall assess the consistency of the comprehensive plan with: a. Changes to State Comprehensive Plan since 1985; b. Changes to appropriate strategic regional policy plan; c. Changes to Rule 9J -5, F.A.C.; and d. Changes to Chapter 163, Part Il, Florida Statutes. 7. Identification of any Needed Actions to Ad- dress the Planning Issues Raised in the Report a. New, revised, minimum 5 -year and mini- mum 10 -year timeframes and population pro- jections; b. New and revised goals, objectives and poli- cies; c. Revised future conditions maps; d. New capital improvements element; 9J- 5.0055 Concurrency Management System. The purpose of the concurrency management system is to establish an ongoing mechanism which ensures that public facilities and services needed to support develop- ment are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. (1) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. Each local government shall adopt, as a component of the comprehensive plan, objectives, policies and standards for the establishment of a concurrency management system. The concurrency management system will ensure that issuance of a de- velopment order or development permit is conditioned upon the availability of public facilities and services nec- essary to serve new development, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part ll, Florida Statutes, and this Rule. The concurrency management system shall include: 19 (a) A requirement that the local government shall maintain the adopted level of service standards for roads, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, and mass transit, if ap- plicable. (b) A requirement that the local government Capital Improvements Element, as provided by Section 9J- 5.016 of this Chapter, shall set forth a financially feasible plan which demonstrates that the adopted level of service standards will be achieved and main- tained. (c) A system for monitoring and ensuring adherence to the adopted level of service standards, the sched- ule of capital improvements, and the availability of public facility capacity. (d) Guidelines for interpreting and applying level of service standards to applications for development orders and development permits and determining when the test for concurrency must be met. The latest point in the application process for the deter- mination of concurrency is prior to the approval of an application for a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of development. (e) A requirement that the local government shall adopt land development regulations which specify and implement provisions of the concurrency man- agement system and, as a minimum, provide a pro- gram that ensures that development orders and de- velopment permits are issued in a manner that will not result in a reduction in the levels of service be- low the adopted level of service standards for the affected facility. (2) LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS (a) For the purpose of the issuance of development orders and development permits, local governments must adopt level of service standards for public fa- cilities and services located within the area for which such local government has authority to issue devel- opment orders and development permits. For the purposes of concurrency, public facilities and ser- vices include the following for which level of service standards must be adopted under Chapter 9J -5, F.A.C.: 1. Roads, Rule 9J- 5.0071(4)(c)1. 2. Sanitary sewer, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.a. 3. Solid waste, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.b. 4. Drainage, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.c. 5. Potable water, Rule 9J- 5.011(2)(c)2.d. 6. Parks and Recreation, Rule 9J- 5.014(3)(c)4. 7. Mass transit, Rule 9J- 5.0071(4)(c)1., if appli- cable. 8. Roads and public transit, Rule 9J- 5.0071(4)(c)1. y✓-o.uuss System (b) A local government, at its option, may make ad- ditional public facilities and services subject to the concurrency management system. Level of service standards of such additional facilities must be adopted in the local government comprehensive plan. If a local government desires to extend the concurrency requirement to public schools, it should first complete a study to determine how the concurrency requirement is to be addressed and implemented by the local government, school board and all other parties responsible for school facilities. [Section 163.3180(1), Florida Statutes] (c) For facilities on the Florida Intrastate Highway System as defined in s. 338.001, Florida Statutes, the local governments shall adopt the level of ser- vice standards established by the Department of Transportation by rule. For other roads local govern- ments shall adopt adequate level of service stan- dards. These level of service standards shall be adopted to ensure that adequate facility capacity will be provided to serve the existing and future land uses as demonstrated by the supporting data and analysis in the comprehensive plan. [Section 163.3180(l 0), Florida Statutes] (d) A local government may desire to have a tiered, two -level approach for the level of service standard. To utilize a tiered approach, the local government must adopt an initial level of service standard as a policy to be utilized for the purpose of the issuance of development orders and development permits. A second policy may be included which adopts a higher level of service standard by a date certain to be uti- lized for the purpose of the issuance of development orders and permits. The specific date for this sec- ond policy to become effective must be included in the plan. The plan must set forth the specific ac- tions and programs for attaining the higher level of service by the specified date. If the identified ac- tions and programs are not attained by the specified date, the local government comprehensive plan must be amended to specify the level of service standard that will be utilized and be binding for the purpose of the issuance of development orders and permits. (3) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCURRENCY. Every jurisdiction shall maintain a concurrency manage- ment system to ensure that public facilities and ser- vices to support development are available concurrent with the impact of development, consistent with the pro- visions of this Chapter. (a) For sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and potable water facilities, at a minimum, a local gov- ernment shall meet the following standards to sat- isfy the concurrency requirements: 1. A development order or permit is issued sub- ject to the condition that, at the time of the issu- ance of a certificate of occupancy or its func- tional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or develop- ment order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issu- ance of a certificate of occupancy or its func- tional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), Florida Statutes] (b) For parks and recreation facilities, at a minimum, a local government shall meet the following stan- dards to satisfy the concurrency requirement: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued sub- ject to the condition that, at the time of the issu- ance of a certificate of occupancy or its func- tional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new develop- ment is dedicated or acquired by the local gov- ernment, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A development order or permit is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy or its functional equivalent as provided in the adopted local government 5 -year sched- ule of capital improvements; or b. At the time the development order or per- mit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary fa- cilities and services to serve the new develop- ment to be in place or under actual construc- tion not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or 21 9J- 5.0055 Concurrency Management c. At the time the development order or per- mit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chap- ter 380, Florida Statutes, to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), Florida Statutes] (c) For transportation facilities (roads and mass tran- sit designated in the adopted local government com- prehensive plan), at a minimum, a local government shall meet the following standards to satisfy the concurrency requirement, except as otherwise pro- vided in subsections (4) — (7) of this Section. 1. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued sub- ject to the conditions that the necessary facili- ties and services needed to serve the new de- velopment are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent as provided in the adopted local government five -year schedule of capital improvements. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include trans- portation projects included in the firstthree years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five -year work program. The Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: a. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. b. A provision that a plan amendment is re- quired to eliminate, defer, or delay construc- tion of any road or mass transit facility or ser- vice which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five -year schedule of capital improvements; or 3. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and ser- vices to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy or its functional equivalent; or 4. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agree- ment, pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development or- der issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Stat- utes, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equiva- lent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), Florida Statutes] 5. For the purpose of issuing a development or- der or permit, a proposed urban redevelopment project located within a defined and mapped Existing Urban Service Area as established in the local government comprehensive plan pur- suant to Section 163.3164(29), Florida Statutes, shall not be subject to the concurrency require- ments of Rule 9J- 5.0055(3)(c)1. — 4. of this Chapterfor up to 110 percent of the transporta- tion impact generated by the previously exist- ing development. For the purposes of this provi- sion, a previously existing development is the actual previous built use which was occupied and active within a time period established in the local government comprehensive plan. [Sec- tion 163.3180(8), Florida Statutes] 6. For the purpose of issuing a development or- der or permit, a proposed development may be deemed to have a de minimis impact and may not be subject to the concurrency requirements of Rules 9J- 5.0055(3)(c) 1. —4., only if all of the conditions specified in Subsection 163.3180(6), F.S., are met. [Section 163.3180(6), F.S.] (4) LONG TERM TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. To correct existing deficien- cies in transportation facilities and to set priorities for reducing the backlog on transportation facilities, local governments are authorized to adopt, as a part of the comprehensive plan, a long -term transportation concurrency management system with a planning pe- riod of up to 10 years that meets the following require- ments: (a) To implement a long -term transportation concurrency management system, a local govern- ment must designate in the comprehensive plan specific areas where significant backlogs presently exist. These areas must be delineated on an adopted comprehensive plan map and must be consistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan in- cluding the future land use map. 22 va -muuoo c;oncurrency Management (b) The long -term concurrency management system must be a financially feasible system to ensure that existing deficiencies are corrected within the 10 -year period and establish priorities for addressing back- logged facilities. This may be accomplished by adopt- ing a long -term schedule of capital improvements for transportation facilities for up to 10 years for the special concurrency districts or areas. The long -term schedule of capital improvements must include the transportation facilities required to correct existing deficiencies as well as to accommodate new devel- opment, and shall provide a realistic, financially fea- sible funding system based on currently available revenue sources which must be adequate to fund the scheduled improvements. The schedule must also include the estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. This schedule may be relied on as a basis for issuing development permits which meet concurrency requirements in lieu of the provi- sion of Rule 9J- 5.0055(3)(c)1. —4. of this Chapter. (c) A policy in the local comprehensive plan that a plan amendment shall be required to eliminate, de- fer, or delay construction of any road or public tran- sit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the long -term schedule of capital improvements, if established. (d) As part of a long -term transportation concurrency management system, a local government may adopt policies in its comprehensive plan to establish in- terim level of service standards on certain facilities in long -term concurrency areas for the purpose of the issuance of development orders and permits in these districts. The local government may establish a schedule for achieving specified improvements in the interim level of service standards for intervals of time in the future. The plan should set forth specific actions and programs including a monitoring pro- gram for achieving the scheduled improvements in the interim levels of service. This monitoring program should require that in the event that the identified actions and programs are not attained as sched- uled, the local government comprehensive plan should be amended to specify the default level of service standards that will be utilized and be binding for the purpose of the issuance of development or- ders and permits. (e) Local governments with a severe backlog of trans- portation facilities may request the Department's approval for a planning period of up to 15 years for establishing a long -term transportation concurrency management system which meets the requirements of Subparagraph 9J- 5.0055(4) of this Chapter. A lo- cal government seeking such an approval must dem- onstrate that its transportation backlog for existing development cannot be adequately addressed with a 10 -year plan. In considering such a request, the department's analysis shall include a comparison of the circumstances of the requesting local govern- ment with the general situation facing similarly situ - ated jurisdictions, using the following criteria: 1. The extent of the backlog. 2. Whether the backlog is on local or state roads. 3. The cost of eliminating the backlog. 4. The local government's tax and other revenue raising efforts. [Section 163.3180(9), Florida Statutes] (5) TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MANAGE- MENT AREAS. The purpose of this optional alternative transportation concurrency approach is to promote infill development or redevelopment within selected portions of urban areas in a manner that supports the provision of more eff icient mobility alternatives, including publictran- sit. As a coordinated approach to land use and transpor- tation development, it may employ the use of an areawide level of service standard and an accommodation and management of traffic congestion. A transportation concurrency management area is a compact geographic area with existing or proposed multiple, viable alterna- tive travel paths or modes for common trips. (a) An areawide level of service standard may be established for specified facilities, and must be main- tained, as a basis for the issuance of development orders and permits within one or more designated transportation concurrency management areas. Areawide level of service standards may only be established for facilities with similar functions serv- ing common origins and destinations. Designation of each transportation concurrency management area and establishment of areawide level of service standards within such areas must be supported by data and analysis in the local government compre- hensive plan support document which: 1. Demonstrate that the transportation concurrency management areas, as designated, are compatible with and further the various por- tions and elements of the local comprehensive plan. 2. Provide a justification of the size and bound- aries of each transportation concurrency man- 23 9J -5.055 Concurrency Management System agement area for consistency with the purpose of this Subsection. 3. Demonstrate that transportation concurrency management areas as designated contain an integrated and connected network of roads and provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. 4. Demonstrate the basis for establishing the areawide level of service standards and deter- mine existing and projected transportation ser- vice and facility requirements that will support the established areawide level of service stan- dard. 5. Demonstrate that the established areawide level of service and other transportation services and programs will support infill development or redevelopment. 6. Demonstrate that the planned roadway im- provements and other services and programs such as, transportation system management (TSM) and /or transportation demand manage- ment (TDM) strategies and incentives to use public transit (such as parking policies and pro- vision of intermodal transfers), will accomplish mobility within and through each concurrency management area. (b) Transportation concurrency management areas established pursuant to this subsection shall be de- lineated on the future conditions maps, including the future traffic circulation map or transportation map, as applicable, of a local government comprehensive plan consistent with this Subsection. The areawide level of service standards and associated maximum service volumes must be established as policies in the comprehensive plan. Transportation concurrency management areas may transcend jurisdictional boundaries when appropriate and must be desig- nated in each applicable comprehensive plan con- sistent with the provisions of this Subsection. A lo- cal government should coordinate with the Depart- ment of Transportation, and if applicable, the metro- politan planning organization when designating trans- portation concurrency management area boundaries. (c) The local comprehensive plan shall contain ob- jectives and policies which specify actions and pro- grams to promote infill development and redevelop- ment. A local government shall adopt and maintain an integrated and internally consistent transporta- tion, land use, and capital improvement planning program for each concurrency management area to maintain the established areawide level of service standard. (6) TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREAS. The purpose of this flexible transportation concurrency option approach is to reduce the adverse impact transportation concurrency may have on urban infill development and redevelopment and the achieve- ment of other goals and policies of the state comprehen- sive plan, such as promoting the development of public transportation. Under limited circumstances, it allows exceptions to the transportation concurrency requirement in specifically defined urban areas of a jurisdiction. The exceptions provide flexibility for concurrency manage- ment in order to encourage the application of a wide range of planning strategies that correspond with local circumstances of a specific geographic area. The ex- ceptions apply to all land uses and development and types of facilities within expressly excepted areas. Lo- cal governments must specifically consider the impacts of the exception areas on the Florida Intrastate Highway System. (a) In order to exercise the option of establishing a transportation concurrency exception area, a local government must designate in its comprehensive plan a specific geographic area, or areas, of trans- portation concurrency exception, consistent with the purpose of this Subsection. A proposed development located in a designated exception area shall not be subject to the requirements of Rule 9J- 5.0055(3)(c)1. —4. of this Chapter. The designation of a transpor- tation concurrency exception area may include: 1. A specific geographic area, or areas, delin- eated in the local government comprehensive plan for urban infill development pursuant to Section 163.3164(27), Florida Statutes. The lo- cal comprehensive plan shall contain objectives and policies which specify actions and programs to promote urban infill development. An area de- lineated for urban infill development shall meet the following requirements. a. The area contains not more than 10 per - cent developable vacant land. The developable vacant land shall not include water bodies and land designated for conservation use, natural reservations, public road rights of way, public recreation sites, or related activities or uses designated in the local government's compre- hensive plan as unavailable for development. b. For areas where residential use is the pre- dominant type of use comprising greater than 60 percent of the developed land, the average residential density shall be at least five dwell- ing units per gross residentially developed acre of land use. For areas where nonresidential 24 use is the predominate type of use compris- ing greater than 60 percent of the developed land, the average nonresidential density shall be at least a floor area ratio of 1.0 per gross non residentially developed acre of land use. If neither residential nor nonresidential uses com- prise greater than 60 percent of the developed land, then both the existing residential use and nonresidential use shall meet the appro- priate density and intensity criteria prescribed above. The term "gross developed acre" shall include all uses associated with the predomi- nant land use including parking, drainage, open space, landscaping and other support facilities. 2. A specific geographic area, or areas, delin- eated in the local government comprehensive plan for urban redevelopment pursuant to Sec- tion 163.3164(26), Florida Statutes. The plan must show that the urban redevelopment area is within an urban infill area which meets the criteria of rule 9J- 5.0055(6)(a)1.a. and b. which is established as a specific geographic area in the plan, or within an existing urban service area pursuant to Section 163.3164(29), Florida Stat- utes, established in the plan as a specific geo- graphic area which does not contain more than 40 percent developable vacant land. The local comprehensive plan shall contain objectives and policies which specify actions and programs to promote urban redevelopment. A designated urban redevelopment area may include a Com- munity Redevelopment Area established pursu- ant to the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 when these areas exist within an urban infill area or an Existing Urban Service Area as designated in the local comprehensive plan. 3. A specific geographic area delineated in the local government comprehensive plan for down- town revitalization within the designated central business district pursuant to Section 163.3164(25), Florida Statutes. The comprehen- sive plan shall contain objectives and policies which specify actions and programsto promote downtown revitalization. (b) To implement the transportation concurrency ex- ception areas, the following requirements must be met: 1. The transportation concurrency exception areas, as designated, must be compatible with and further the various portions and elements of the local comprehensive plan. 9J- 5.0057 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas 2. The size and boundaries of each transporta- tion concurrency exception area must be sup- ported by data and analysis in the local government's plan support document which demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this Subsection. A local government should coordinate with the Department of Transporta- tion and the local metropolitan planning organi- zation when designating transportation concurrency exception area boundaries. 3. Transportation concurrency exception areas may transcend jurisdictional boundaries when appropriate and must be designated in each applicable comprehensive plan consistent with the provisions of this Subsection. (c) To implement the transportation concurrency ex- ceptions, a local government should adopt as an amendment to its comprehensive plan, guidelines and /or policies which specify programs to address transportation needs of such areas. The guidelines may incorporate a wide range of strategies includ- ing, timing and staging plans, parking control and pricing policies, transportation demand management programs, transportation system management pro- grams availability of public transportation, and utili- zation of creative financing tools for the provision of transportation services and facilities. (d) The guidelines and /or policies and programs implementing a transportation concurrency excep- tion area as required in the above paragraph (c), if applicable, must demonstrate by supporting data and analysis, including short and long range traff ic analysis, that consideration has been given to the impact of proposed development within the concurrency exception area on the Florida Intrast- ate Highway System. (7) CONCU RRENCY EXCEPTION — FOR PROJECTS THAT PROMOTE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. The pur- pose of this flexible transportation concurrency option is to reduce the adverse impact transportation concurrency may have on the promotion of public transportation in- cluding goals and policies of the state comprehensive plan. Local governments may exempt projects that pro- mote public transportation as defined in Section 163.3164(28), Florida Statutes, by establishing in the local comprehensive plan, guidelines and/or policies for the granting of such exceptions. Those guidelines must demonstrate by supporting data and analysis, that con- sideration has been given to the impact of the projects on the Florida Interstate Highway System. The guide- lines must establish how a project will qualify as a project that promotes public transportation. rurure r_ana (8) PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO LOCAL GOVERN- MENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING. In order to exercise the option of issuing a development order or permit pursuant to Section 163.3180(l 1), a local govern- ment must identify in the comprehensive plan a process for assessing, receiving, and applying a fair share of the cost of providing the transportation facilities necessary to serve the proposed development. The transportation facilities must be included in a financially feasible five - year Capital Improvement Schedule adopted pursuant to Section 9J -5.016 of this Chapter. The assessment shall have a reasonable relationship to the transporta- tion impact that is generated by the proposed develop- ment. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177(3), (6), (8), (9), (10), (11) FS. History—New 11- 22 -89, Amended 3-23-94,3-21-99. 9J- 5.0057 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3161(3), 163.3177(3), (6), (9), (10) FS. History— New4 -2 -92, Repealed3- 23 -94. 9J -5.006 Future Land Use Element. The purpose of the future land use element is the desig- nation of future land use patterns as reflected in the goals, objectives and policies of the local government compre- hensive plan elements. Future land use patterns are depicted on the future land use map or map series within the element. (1) Existing Land Use Data Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data requirements pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) The following generalized land uses or conditions shall be shown on the existing land use map or map series: 1. Residential use; 2. Commercial use; 3. Industrial use; 4. Agricultural use; 5. Recreational use; 6. Conservation use; 7. Educational use; 8. Public buildings and grounds; 9. Other public facilities; 10. Vacant or undeveloped land; and 11. Historic resources. (b) The following natural resources shall be shown on the existing land use map or map series: 1. Existing and planned public potable water wells and wellhead protection areas; 2. Beaches and shores, including estuarine sys- tems; 3. Rivers, bays, lakes, floodplains, and harbors; 4. Wetlands; and 5. Minerals and soils. (c) The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided in tabular form for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. (d) If determined by the local government to be ap- propriate, educational uses, public buildings and grounds, and other public facilities may be shown as one land use category on the existing land use map or map series. (e) If the local government has determined it neces- sary to utilize other categories of the public and pri- vate use of land, such categories of land use shall be shown on the existing land use map or map se- ries, and clearly identified in the legend. (f) The existing land use map or map series shall: 1. Indicate the generalized land uses of land adjacent to its boundaries; municipalities shall also indicate unincorporated enclaves located within their corporate limits; 2. Identify any areas that fall within a designated area of critical state concern, pursuant to Sec- tion 380.05, Florida Statutes; and 3. Identify any existing dredge spoil disposal sites for coastal counties and municipalities that have dredge spoil disposal responsibilities. 26 4.64 MR C. d..re I __. II— rI. (g) Population projections as prescribed in the gen- eral requirements section of this Chapter. (2) Land Use Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following analyses which support the comprehensive plan pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) An analysis of the availability of facilities and services as identified in the traffic circulation, trans- portation, and sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water and natural groundwater aquifer re- charge elements, to serve existing land uses included in the data requirements above and land for which development orders have been issued; (b) An analysis of the character and magnitude of existing vacant or undeveloped land in order to de- termine its suitability for use, including where avail- able: 1. Gross vacant or undeveloped land area, as indicated in Paragraph (1)(b); 2. Soils; 3. Topography; 4. Natural resources; and 5. Historic resources; (c) An analysis of the amount of land needed to ac- commodate the projected population, including: 1. The categories of land use and their densi- ties or intensities of use, 2. The estimated gross acreage needed by cat - egory, and 3. A description of the methodology used; (d) An analysis of the need for redevelopment in- cluding: 1. Renewal of blighted areas, and 2. Elimination or reduction of uses inconsistent with the community's character and proposed future land uses; (e) An analysis of the proposed development and redevelopment of flood prone areas based upon a suitability determination from Flood Insurance Rate Maps, Flood Hazard Boundary Maps, or other most accurate information available. (f) For coastal counties and municipalities with dredge spoil responsibilities, include an analysis of the need for additional dredge spoil disposal sites through the longterm planning period established in the plan. (g) An analysis of proposed development and rede- velopment based on recommendations, deemed appropriate by the local government, contained in any existing or future hazard mitigation reports. (3) Requirements for Future Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies. (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(6)(a), Florida Statutes, and which: 1. Coordinate future land uses with the appro- priate topography and soil conditions, and the availability of facilities and services; 2. Encourage the redevelopment and renewal of blighted areas; 3. Encourage the elimination or reduction of uses inconsistent with the community's character and future land uses; 4. Ensure the protection of natural resources and historic resources; 5. Coordinate coastal planning area population densities with the appropriate local or regional hurricane evacuation plan, when applicable; 6. Coordinate future land uses by encouraging the elimination or reduction of uses that are in- consistent with any interagency hazard mitiga- tion report recommendations that the local gov- ernment determines to be appropriate; 7. Coordinate with any appropriate resource plan- ning and management plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and approved by the Governor and Cabinet; 8. Discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl; 9. Ensure the availability of suitable land for util- ity facilities necessary to support proposed de- velopment; 27 9J -5.006 Future Land Use Element 10. Encourage the use of innovative land devel- opment regulations which may include provisions for planned unit developments and other mixed land use development techniques; and 11. Ensure the availability of dredge spoil dis- posal sites for coastal counties and municipali- ties that have spoil disposal responsibilities. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address implementation activities for the: 1. Regulation of land use categories included on the future land use map or map series; sub- divisions; signage; and areas subject to sea- sonal or periodic flooding; 2. Provision for compatibility of adjacent land uses; 3. Provision that facilities and services meet the locally established level of service standards, and are available concurrent with the impacts of development, or that development orders and permits are specifically conditioned on the avail- ability of the facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development; and that fa- cilities that provide utility service to the various land uses are authorized at the same time as the land uses are authorized; 4. Provision for drainage and stormwater man- agement, open space, and safe and convenient on -site traffic flow, considering needed vehicle parking; 5. Provision of mixed land use designation poli- cies, if locally desired; 6. Protection of potable water wellfields by des- ignating appropriate activities and land uses within wellhead protection areas, and environ- mentally sensitive land; 7. Establishment of standards for densities or intensities of use for each future land use cat- egory; 8. Identification, designation and protection of historically significant properties; and 9. Designation of dredge spoil disposal sites for counties and municipalities located in the coastal area and include the criteria for site se- lection established in consultation with naviga- lion and inlet districts and other appropriate state and federal agencies and the public. Site selec- tion criteria shall ensure sufficient sites to meet future needs, be consistent with environmental and natural resource protection policies estab- lished in the elements of this plan and meet reasonable cost and transportation require- ments. (4) Future Land Use Map. (a) The proposed distribution, extent, and location of the following generalized land uses shall be shown on the future land use map or map series: 1. Residential use; 2. Commercial use; 3. Industrial use; 4. Agricultural use; 5. Recreational use; 6. Conservation use; 7. Educational use; 8. Public buildings and grounds; 9. Other public facilities; 10. Historic district boundaries and designated historically significant properties meriting pro- tection; 11. Transportation concurrency management area boundaries or transportation concurrency exception area boundaries, if any such areas have been designated. (b) The following natural resources or conditions shall be shown on the future land use map or map series: 1. Existing and planned public potable watenvells and wellhead protection areas; 2. Beaches and shores, including estuarine sys- tems; 3. Rivers, bays, lakes, flood plains, and harbors; 4. Wetlands; 5. Minerals and soils; and 28 9J -5.006 F"hire I and lion F /mm�nl 6. Coastal high hazard areas. (c) Mixed use categories of land use are encour- aged. If used, policies forthe implementation of such mixed uses shall be included in the comprehensive plan, including the types of land uses allowed, the percentage distribution among the mix of uses, or other objective measurement, and the density or in- tensity of each use. (d) If determined by the local government to be ap- propriate, educational uses, public buildings and grounds, and other public facilities may be shown as one land use category on the future land use map or map series. (e) If the local government has determined it neces- sary to utilize other categories of the public and pri- vate use of land, such categories of land use shall be shown on the future land use map or map series. (f) The future land use map or map series of a county may also designate areas for possible future mu- nicipal incorporation. (5) Review of Plans and Plan Amendments for Discour- aging the Proliferation of Urban Sprawl. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this subsection is to give guidance to local governments and other inter- ested parties about how to make sure that plans and plan amendments are consistent with relevant provisions of the state comprehensive plan, regional policy plans, Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and the re- mainder of this chapter regarding discouraging ur- ban sprawl, including provisions concerning the effi- ciency of land use, the efficient provision of public facilities and services, the separation of urban and rural land uses, and the protection of agriculture and natural resources. (b) Determination. The determination of whether a plan or plan amendment discourages the prolifera- tion of urban sprawl shall be based upon the stan- dards contained in this subsection. (c) In general. The discouragement of urban sprawl accomplishes many related planning objectives. The purpose of this subsection is to provide a general methodology for examining whether or not a plan or plan amendment discourages the proliferation of ur- ban sprawl. This subsection is organized into twelve paragraphs, Paragraphs (5)(a) through (5)(1). Noth- ing in this paragraph (5) shall be interpreted to re- quire that a local government submit information beyond the information required by other provisions of this chapter. (d) Use of indicators. Paragraph (5)(g) describes those aspects or attributes of a plan or plan amend- ment which, when present, indicate that the plan or plan amendment may fail to discourage urban sprawl. For purposes of reviewing the plan for discourage- ment of urban sprawl, an evaluation shall be made whether any of these indicators is present in a plan or plan amendment. If an indicator is present, the extent, amount or frequency of that indicator shall be considered. The presence and potential effects of multiple indicators shall be considered to deter- mine whether they collectively reflect a failure to dis- courage urban sprawl. (e) Methodology for determining indicators. Para- graphs (5)(h) through (5)(j) describe the three major components of a methodology to determine the pres- ence of urban sprawl indicators. Paragraph (5)(h) describes how land use aspects of a plan shall be analyzed. The land use element, including both the future land use map and associated objectives and policies, represents the focal point of the local government's planning effort. Paragraph (5)(i) de- scribes the unique features and characteristics of each jurisdiction which provide the context of the analysis and which are needed to evaluate the ex- tent, amount or frequency of an indicator and the significance of an indicator for a specific jurisdic- tion. Paragraph (5)0) recognizes that land use plans generally may be significantly affected by other de- velopment policies in a plan which may serve to miti- gate the presence of urban sprawl indicators based on the land use plan alone. Paragraph (5)0) de- scribes development controls which may be used by a local government to mitigate the presence of urban sprawl. (f) Analysis components. Subsection (5)(k) describes how the analysis components described in Subsec- tions (5)(h) through (5)(j) are combined in a system- atic way to determine the presence of urban sprawl indicators. (g) Primary indicators. The primary indicators that a plan or plan amendment does not discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl are listed below. The evaluation of the presence of these indicators shall consist of an analysis of the plan or plan amend- ment within the context of features and characteris- tics unique to each locality in order to determine whether the plan or plan amendment: 1. Promotes, allows or designates for develop- ment substantial areas of the jurisdiction to de- velop as low- intensity, low- density, or single -use development or uses in excess of demonstrated need. 29 9J -5.006 Future Land Use Element 2. Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing ur- ban areas while leaping over undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development. 3. Promotes, allows or designates urban devel- opment in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon pat- terns generally emanating from existing urban developments. 4. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails ad- equately to protect and conserve natural re- sources, such as wetlands, floodplains, native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estua- rine systems, and other significant natural sys- tems. 5. Fails adequately to protect adjacent agricul- tural areas and activities, including silviculture, and including active agricultural and silvicultural activities as well as passive agricultural activi- ties and dormant, unique and prime farmlands and soils. 6. Fails to maximize use of existing public fa- cilities and services. 7. Fails to maximize use of future public facili- ties and services. 8. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time, money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, law enforcement, education, health care, fire and emergency response, and general government. 9. Fails to provide a clear separation between rural and urban uses. 10. Discourages or inhibits infill development or the redevelopment of existing neighborhoods and communities. 11. Fails to encourage an attractive and func- tional mix of uses. 12. Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses. 13. Results in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. (h) Evaluation of land uses. The comprehensive plan must be reviewed in its entirety to make the deter- minations in (5)(g) above. Plan amendments must be reviewed individually and for their impact on the remainder of the plan. However, in either case, a land use analysis will be the focus of the review and constitute the primary factor for making the determi- nations. Land use types cumulatively (within the entire jurisdiction and areas less than the entire jurisdic- tion, and in proximate areas outside the jurisdiction) will be evaluated based on density, intensity, distri- bution and functional relationship, including an analy- sis of the distribution of urban and rural land uses. Each land use type will be evaluated based on: 1. Extent. 2. Location. 3. Distribution. 4. Density. 5. Intensity. 6. Compatibility. 7. Suitability. 8. Functional relationship. 9. Land use combinations. 10. Demonstrated need over the planning pe- riod. (i) Local conditions. Each of the land use factors in (5)(h) above will be evaluated within the context of features and characteristics unique to each locality. These include: 1. Size of developable area. 2. Projected growth rate (including population, commerce, industry, and agriculture). 3. Projected growth amounts (acres per land use category). 4. Facility availability (existing and committed). 5. Existing pattern of development (built and vested), including an analysis of the extent to which the existing pattern of development re- flects urban sprawl. 30 Q.1.9 MR Rd••.e I a...J I L... r•. 6. Projected growth trends over the planning period, including the change in the overall den- sity or intensity of urban development through- out the jurisdiction. 7. Costs of facilities and services, such as per capita cost over the planning period in terms of resources and energy. 8. Extra- jurisdictional and regional growth char- acteristics. 9. Transportation networks and use character- istics (existing and committed). 10. Geography, topography and various natural features of the jurisdiction. Q) Development controls. Development controls in the comprehensive plan may affect the determina- tions in (5)(g) above. The following development con- trols, to the extent they are included in the compre- hensive plan, will be evaluated to determine how they discourage urban sprawl: 1. Open space requirements. 2. Development clustering requirements. 3. Other planning strategies, including the es- tablishment of minimum development density and intensity, affecting the pattern and charac- ter of development. 4. Phasing of urban land use types, densities, intensities, extent, locations, and distribution over time, as measured through the permitted changes in land use within each urban land use category in the plan, and the timing and loca- tion of those changes. 5. Land use locational criteria related to the ex- isting development pattern, natural resources and facilities and services. 6. Infrastructure extension controls, and infra- structure maximization requirements and incen- tives. 7. Allocation of the costs of future development based on the benefits received. 8. The extent to which new development pays for itself. 9. Transfer of development rights. 10. Purchase of development rights Traffic 11. Planned unit development requirements. 12. Traditional neighborhood developments. 13. Land use funcbonal relationship linkages and mixed land uses. 14. Jobs -to- housing balance requirements. 15. Policies specifying the circumstances un- der which future amendments could designate new lands for the urbanizing area. 16. Provision for new towns, rural villages or ru- ral activity centers. 17. Effective functional buffering requirements. 18. Restriction on expansion of urban areas. sitive areas, maintaining the economic viability of agricultural and other predominantly rural land uses, and providing for the cost - efficient delivery of public facilities and services, will be recognized as meth- ods of discouraging urban sprawl and will be deter- mined consistent with the provisions of the state comprehensive plan, regional policy plans, Chapter 163, Part II, and this chapter regarding discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (f0) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(a), (8),(9), (10) FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,4-2-92,3-23- 94,5- 18 -94, 3- 21 -99. 9J -5.007 Traffic Circulation Element. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. 19. Planning strategies and incentives which Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(b), (8), (9), (10) promote the continuation of productive agricul- FS. tural areas and the protection of environmen- History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,3-23-94, Re- tally sensitive lands. pealed2- 20 -96. 20. Urban service areas. 21. Urban growth boundaries. 22. Access management controls. (k) Evaluation of factors. Each of the land use types and land use combinations analyzed in Paragraph (5)(h) above will be evaluated within the context of the features and characteristics of the locality, indi- vidually and together (as appropriate), as listed in Paragraph (5)(i). If a local government has in place a comprehensive plan found in compliance, the De- partment shall not find a plan amendment to be not in compliance on the issue of discouraging urban sprawl solely because of preexisting indicators if the amendment does not exacerbate existing indicators of urban sprawl within the jurisdiction. (1) Innovative and flexible planning and development strategies. Notwithstanding and as a means of ad- dressing any provisions contained in rules 9J- 5.006(3)(b)8., 9J- 5.011(2)(b)3., 9J- 5.003(140) and this subsection, the Department encourages innovative and flexible planning and development strategies and creative land use planning techniques in local plans. Planning strategies and techniques such as urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area - based allocations, clustering and open space provi- sions, mixed -use development and sector planning that allow the conversion of rural and agricultural lands to other uses while protecting environmentally sen- 9J -5.008 Mass Transit Element. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(i), (7)(a), (8), (9), (10) FS. History—New 3-6-86, Amended 10- 20 -86, Repealed 2- 20-96. 31 9J -5.009 Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities Ele- ment. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(i), (7)(b), (8), (9), (10) FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,3-23-94, Re- pealed 2- 20 -96. 9J -5.010 Housing Element. The purpose of this element is to provide guidance to local governments to develop appropriate plans and poli- cies to meet identified or projected deficits in the supply of housing for moderate income, low income, and very low income households, group homes, foster care facili- ties, and households with special housing needs, in- cluding rural and farmworker housing. These plans and policies shall address government activities as well as provide direction and assistance to the efforts of the pri- vate sector. (1) Housing Element Data Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data requirements pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) An inventory taken from the latest decennial United States Census or more recent estimates, including the affordable housing needs assessment, when available, which shall include the number and distribution of dwelling units by type, tenure, age, rent, value, monthly cost of owner - occupied units, and rent or cost to income ratio. (b) Each municipality shall compare those housing characteristics in Paragraph (a) deemed significant by the municipality with those housing characteris- tics of its county. (c) An inventory using data from the latest decennial United States Census, or more recent estimates, including the affordable housing needs assessment, when available, showing the number of dwelling units in each of the following categories: lacking complete plumbing; lacking complete kitchen facilities; lack- ing central heating; and overcrowded. The inventory shall include locally determined definitions of "stan- dard" and of "substandard" housing conditions and shall include an estimate of the structural condition of housing within the local government's jurisdiction, by the number and generalized location of dwelling units in standard and substandard condition. The inventory shall also include the methodology used to estimate the condition of housing. (d) An inventory of renter - occupied housing develop- ments currently using federal, state or local subsi- dies. For each development listed, show the sub- sidy program, and number of units. (e) An inventory of group homes licensed by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Ser- vices, including the type, number, generalized loca- tion and capacity. (f) An inventory of existing mobile home parks li- censed by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and mobile home condomini- ums, cooperatives and subdivisions including the generalized location and capacity. (g) An inventory of historically significant housing listed on the Florida Master Site File, National Reg- ister of Historic Places or designated as historically significant by or in accordance with a local ordinance, and shall include their generalized locations. (h) An inventory of the amount of housing construc- tion activity affecting changes in the number of hous- 32 y✓ -a.uiu tiousmQ Element ing units within the local government's jurisdiction based on new construction, conversions, mobile home placements, and removals, in number of units for the years since the latest decennial United States Census. (2) Housing Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon following analyses which support the comprehensive plan pursuantto Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) A projection of the anticipated number of house- holds by size and income range derived from the population projections in Paragraph 9J- 5.005(2)(e); (b) The housing need of the current and anticipated future residents of the jurisdiction, including an af- fordable housing needs assessment, when available, and including separate estimates of need for rural and farmworker households, by number, type, cost or rent, tenure, and any other special housing needs, and shall include estimates for the replacement of housing units removed and for the maintenance of an adequate vacancy rate. Each local government shall utilize the data and analysis from the state land planning agency's affordable housing needs assessment as one basis for the housing element. The local government, at its option, may conduct its own needs assessment, provided that it uses the methodology established by DCA in its rules; (c) The land requirements for the total estimated housing need; (d) The portion of the housing need which can be projected to be met by the private sector within cur- rent market conditions. The housing expected to be supplied shall be shown by type, tenure, cost or rent, and income range of households served; (e) The existing housing delivery system, including the private sector housing delivery process, with re- gard to land, services, financing, regulations and administrative roles of government agencies to iden- tify problems and opportunities affecting the capac- ity of such housing delivery system, with the objec- tive of effecting improvements to that system to in- crease its efficiency in meeting the goals of this el- ement; and (f) Means for accomplishment of each of the follow- ing: 1. The provision of housing with supporting in- frastructure for all current and anticipated future residents of the jurisdiction with particular em- phasis on the creation orpreservation of afford- able housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of af- fordable housing units only in specific areas of the jurisdiction; 2. The elimination of substandard housing con- ditions and for the structural and aesthetic im- provement of housing; 3. The provision of adequate sites for housing for very-low- income, low- income and moderate - income households, and for mobile homes; 4. The provision of adequate sites in residential areas or areas of residential character for group homes and foster care facilities licensed or funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services; and 5. The identification of conservation, rehabilita- tion or demolition activities, and historically sig- nificant housing or neighborhoods. (3) Requirements for Housing Goals, Objectives and Policies. (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end toward which housing programs and activities are ultimately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(6)(f), Florida Statutes, and which provide for: 1. The creation and/or preservation of affordable housing for all current and anticipated future resi- dents of the jurisdiction, and households with special housing needs including rural and farmworker housing; 2. The elimination of substandard housing con- ditions, and for the structural and aesthetic im- provement of existing housing; 3. Adequate sites and distribution of housing for very-low- income, low-income and moderate -in- come households, and adequate sites for mo- bile and manufactured homes; 4. Adequate sites in residential areas or areas of residential character for group homes and fos- tercare facilities licensed orfunded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services; 5. The conservation, rehabilitation or demolition of housing, including the identification of histori- 33 9J -5.010 Housing Element cally significant housing; 6. Relocation housing; and 7. The formulation of housing implementation programs. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address implementation activities for the: 1. Involvement, including partnerships, of local government with the private and non - profit sec- tors to improve coordination among participants involved in housing production; 2. Specific programs and actions to streamline the permitting process and minimize costs and delays for housing, especially affordable hous- ing; 3. Establishment of standards addressing the quality of housing, stabilization of neighborhoods and identification and improvement of historically significant housing; 4. Establishment of principles to guide conser- vation, rehabilitation and demolition program techniques and strategies; 5. Establishment of principles and criteria guid- ing the location of housing for very-low- income, low- income and moderate - income households, mobile homes, manufactured homes, and house- holds with special housing needs including ru- ral and farmworker households, and including supporting infrastructure and public facilities; 6. Establishment of principles and criteria con- sistent with Chapter 419, F.S., guiding the loca- tion of group homes and foster care facilities licensed or funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services that foster non - discrimination, and encourage the develop- ment of community residential alternatives to institutionalization including supporting infra- structure and public facilities; 7. Utilization of federal, state and local subsidy programs; 8. The utilization of job training, job creation and economic solutions to address a portion of their affordable housing concerns is an optional policy encouraged by s. 163.3177(6)(f)l.g.; 9. Provision of relocation housing; 9J -5.011 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable 81W IV" &W.a• w1vunuwaler 10. Confirming current arrangements with other local governments concerning affordable hous- ing. If it is not economically feasible to meet affordable housing needs within its jurisdiction because of unusually high property values within its jurisdiction, or if meeting that demand within itsjurisdiction would require the direction of popu- lations toward coastal high hazard areas, and local government may satisfy this criterion by having entered into an interlocal agreement with a nearby local government; and 11. Designating within its jurisdiction sufficient sites at sufficient densities to accommodate the need for affordable housing over the planning timeframe. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(f), (8), (9), (10) FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,3-23-94,5-18- 94, 9J -5.011 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable Water and Natural Ground- water Aquifer Recharge Element. The purpose of this element is to provide for necessary public facilities and services correlated to future land use projections. (1) Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Manage- ment, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element Data and Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data and analy- ses requirements pursuant to subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) Each local government shall address in the data and analyses required by this subsection those fa- cilities which provide service within the local government's jurisdiction. (b) Local governments which provide facilities to serve areas within other local government jurisdictions shall also address those facilities in the data and analy- ses required by this subsection, using data from the comprehensive plan for those areas for the purpose of projecting facility needs as required in this sub- section. (c) For shared facilities, each local government shall indicate the proportional capacity of the systems allocated to serve its jurisdiction. (d) Public and private sanitary sewer facilities, solid waste facilities, stormwater management, and po- 34 element table water facilities, as defined in Rule 9J -5.003 shall be identified. (e) The following data shall be included for the facili- ties identified above: 1. The entity having operational responsibility for the facility; 2. The geographic service area of the facility and the predominant types of land uses served by the facility; 3. The design capacity of the facility; 4. The current demand on the facility capacity; and 5. The level of service provided by the facility (f) Existing and projected sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater management and potable water facility needs shall be identified based on the following analy- ses: 1. A facility capacity analysis, by geographic service area, indicating capacity surpluses and deficiencies for: a. Existing conditions, based on the facility design capacity and the current demand on the facility capacity; b. The initial increment of the planning period, at least five years in length, based on the pro- jected demand at current local level of service standards for the facility, resulting from devel- opment permitted by local government, the projected population, land use distributions as indicated in the future land use element, and available surplus capacity identified in the existing conditions capacity analysis; and c. The remaining increment of the planning period, in the same manner as the initial in- cremental capacity analysis, using the appro- priate projected population and future land use distributions for the increment and any avail- able surplus capacity identified in the initial five -year incremental capacity analysis; 2. The general performance of existing facilities, based on best available data, evaluating the ad- equacy of the current level of service provided byfacilities, the general condition and expected life of the facilities, and the impact of the facili- ties upon adjacent natural resources; 9J -5.011 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element 3. An analysis of the problems and opportuni- ties for sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater management and potable water facilities replace- ment, expansion and new facility siting; and 4. An analysis of soil surveys for areas served by septic tanks and an explanation of suitability of those soils for such facilities shall be included, based upon best available data from the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conser- vation Service. (g) Major natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within the local government's jurisdiction shall be identified, and a topographic map if available shall be included de- picting any areas adopted or identified by the re- gional water management district governing board as prime or high groundwater recharge areas. (h) Existing regulations and programs which govern land use and development of natural drainage fea- tures and groundwater recharge areas, or portions thereof, shall be identified and assessed and the strengths and deficiencies in those regulations and programs in maintaining the functions of the natural drainage features and groundwater recharge areas shall be assessed. (2) Requirements for Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Goals, Objectives, and Policies. (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments for each of the facilities or resources ad- dressed in the element which establish the long- term end toward which programs and activities are ultimately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement for each of the facilities or resources addressed in the element which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(6)(c), Florida Statutes, and which: 1. Address correcting existing facility deficien- cies; 2. Address coordinating the extension of, or in- crease in the capacity of, facilities to meet fu- ture needs; 3. Address maximizing the use of existing fa- cilities and discouraging urban sprawl; 35 4. Address conserving potable water resources; and 5. Address protecting the functions of natural groundwater recharge areas and natural drain- age features. High recharge and prime recharge areas shall receive a level of protection com- mensurate with their significance to natural sys- tems or their status as current or future sources of potable water. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective for each of the facilities or resources addressed in the element which address implemen- tation activities for: 1. Establishing priorities for replacement, cor- recting existing facility deficiencies and provid- ing for future facility needs; 2. Establishing and utilizing level of service stan- dards provided by facilities as provided by Sub- section 9J- 5.005(3) and Subparagraph 9J- 5.015(3)(b)3. of this Chapter, such as: a. Average and peak flow design capacity for sanitary sewer facilities; b. Design capacity for solid waste facilities; c. Design storm return frequency for stormwater facilities capacity; d. Minimum design flow, storage capacity, and pressure for potable water facilities; 3. Establishing and utilizing potable water con- servation strategies and techniques; and 4. Regulating land use and development to pro- tect the functions of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. 5. Establishing water quality standards for stormwater discharge. a. Water quality standards for stormwater dis- charge shall be set for all new and existing stormwater management systems. These standards need not be the same for all sys- tems. Local governments shall consider Chap- ter 17 -40, F.A.C., in formulating water quality standards and may adopt by reference Chap- ter 17.25, F.A.C., as standards for water qual- ity. b. This chapter shall not be interpreted or ap- plied to: i. Mandate that local governments require existing facilities to be retrofitted to meet stormwater discharge water quality standards or stormwater management level of service standards. ii. Eliminate any presumption provided by state or regional law or regulation that stormwater management systems which satisfy appropriate state or regional regula- tory design and performance criteria also satisfy applicable stormwater discharge wa- ter quality standards. iii. Prevent local governments from providing that compliance with adequate locally or re- gionally established level of service standards other than the design and performance crite- ria of Chapter 17 -25, F.A.C., shall also be presumed to satisfy the stormwater discharge water quality standards. iv. Prevent local governments from incorpo- rating by reference stormwater management water quality standard exemptions to the extent they appear in state or regional stormwater management water quality laws or regulations. v. Mandate that local governments conduct water quality sampling or testing of stormwater discharge receiving waters to implement the standards described in this subsection. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(c), (8), (9), (10) FS. History— New3- 6- 86, Amended 10-20-86,5-18-94,3-21- 99. 9J -5.012 Coastal Management. The purpose of this element is to plan for and where appropriate restrict development activities where such activities would damage or destroy coastal resources, and protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas that are subject to destruction by natural disaster. (1) Local governments required bylaw to prepare a coastal management element are listed in the document entitled "Local Governments Required to Include Coastal Man- agement Elements in their Comprehensive Plans," dated 36 ao -a.vrc PluaS[at July 1, 1986, and available from the Department upon request. The local governments listed in the document and any other communities that incorporate subsequent to July 1, 1986, and meet the criteria in Chapter 380.24, Florida Statutes, shall include a coastal management element in their comprehensive plans. (2) Coastal Management Data And Analysis Require- ments. The element shall be based upon the following data and analyses requirements pursuant to subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) Existing land uses in the coastal planning area shall be inventoried. Conflicts among shoreline uses shall be analyzed and the need for water - dependent and water - related development sites shall be esti- mated. Any areas in need of redevelopment shall be identified. An analysis of the economic base of the coastal planning area based on the future land use element shall be included. A map or map series showing existing land uses and detailing existing water- dependent and water - related uses shall be prepared. (b) Inventories and analyses of the effect of the fu- ture land uses as required to be shown on the future land use map or map series on the natural resources in the coastal planning area shall be prepared in- cluding: vegetative cover, including wetlands; areas subject to coastal flooding; wildlife habitats; and liv- ing marine resources. Maps shall be prepared of vegetative cover, wildlife habitat, areas subject to coastal flooding, and other areas of special concern to local government. (c) An inventory and analysis of the impacts of de- velopment and redevelopment proposed in the fu- ture land use element on historic resources and sites in the coastal planning area shall be included along with a map of areas designated for historic preserva- tion. (d) An inventory and analysis shall be prepared of estuarine pollution conditions and actions needed to maintain estuaries including: an assessment of general estuarine conditions and identification of known existing point and non -point source pollution problems; an assessment of the impact of the de- velopment and redevelopment proposed in the fu- ture land use element and the impacts of facilities proposed in the traffic circulation and general sani- tary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural groundwater aquifer recharge elements upon water quality, circulation patterns, and accumula- tion of contaminants in sediments; identification of actions needed to remedy existing pollution prob- lems; and identification of existing state, regional and local regulatory programs which will be used to maintain or improve estuarine environmental quality. (e) The following natural disaster planning concerns shall be inventoried or analyzed: 1. Hurricane evacuation planning based on the hurricane evacuation plan contained in the local peacetime emergency plan shall be analyzed and shall consider the hurricane vulnerability zone, the number of persons requiring evacua- tion, the number of persons requiring public hur- ricane shelter, the number of hurricane shelter spaces available, evacuation routes, transpor- tation and hazard constraints on the evacuation routes, and evacuation times. The projected impact of the anticipated population density pro- posed in the future land use element and any special needs of the elderly, handicapped, hos- pitalized, or other special needs of the existing and anticipated populations on the above items shall be estimated. The analysis shall also con- sider measures that the local government could adopt to maintain or reduce hurricane evacua- tion times. 2. Post - disaster redevelopment including: ex- isting and proposed land use in coastal high - hazard areas; structures with a history of re- peated damage in coastal storms; coastal or shore protection structures; infrastructure in coastal high- hazard areas; and beach and dune conditions. Measures which could be used to reduce exposure to hazards shall be analyzed, including relocation, structural modification, and public acquisition. 3. Coastal high- hazard areas shall be identified and the infrastructure within the coastal high - hazard area shall be inventoried. The potential for relocating threatened infrastructure shall be analyzed. (f) Beach and dune systems shall be inventoried and analyzed, including past trends in erosion and ac- cretion, the effects upon the beaches or dunes of coastal or shore protection structures, and identifi- cation of existing and potential beach renourishment areas. The analysis shall also identify measures which could be used to protect or restore beaches ordunes. 9J -5.012 Coastal Management and facilities providing scenic overlooks; marinas; boat ramps; public docks; fishing piers; or othertra- ditional shoreline fishing areas. The capacity of and need for the above facilities shall be analyzed. Pub- lic access facilities shall be shown on the map or map series required by Paragraph (2)(a) as water - dependent uses orfacilities. These inventories and analyses shall be coordinated with the recreation and open space element and any countywide ma- rina siting plan if adopted by the local government. (h) Existing infrastructure in the coastal planning area shall be inventoried, including: roadways, bridges or causeways, sanitary sewer facilities, potable water facilities, man -made drainage facilities, public coastal or shore protection structures, and beach renourishment projects. The demand upon, capac- ity of, and area served by the existing infrastructure shall be analyzed. Analyses shall be prepared which estimate future needs for those facilities listed above, and which shall address the fiscal impact in terms of estimated costs, funding sources and phasing of any needed improvements. (3) Requirements for Coastal Management Goals, Ob- jectives, and Policies. (g) Public access facilities shall be inventoried, in- cluding: all public access points to the beach or shoreline through public lands, private property open to the general public, or other legal means; parking facilities for beach or shoreline access; coastal roads 37 (a) The coastal management element shall contain one or more goal statements which establish the long term end toward which regulatory and manage- ment efforts are directed. These shall reflect the stated intent of the Legislature in enacting Section 163.3178, Florida Statutes, which is that local gov- ernments in their comprehensive plans restrict de- velopment activities that would damage or destroy coastal resources, and protect human life and limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by natural disasters. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(6)(g) and Section 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and which: 1. Protect, conserve, or enhance remaining coastal wetlands, living marine resources, coastal barriers, and wildlife habitat; 2. Maintain or improve estuarine environmental quality; 3. Provide criteria or standards for prioritizing shoreline uses, giving priority to water- depen- dent uses; 4. Protect beaches or dunes, establish construc- tion standards which minimize the impacts of man -made structures on beach or dune sys- tems, and restore altered beaches or dunes; 5. Limit public expenditures that subsidize de- velopment permitted in coastal high- hazard ar- eas subsequent to the element's adoption ex- cept for restoration or enhancement of natural resources; 6. Direct population concentrations away from known or predicted coastal high- hazard areas; 7. Maintain or reduce hurricane evacuation times; 8. Prepare post- disaster redevelopment plans which will reduce or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards; 9. Increase the amount of public access to the beach or shorelines consistent with estimated public needs; 10. Provide for protection, preservation, or sen- sitive reuse of historic resources; and 11. Establish level of service standards, areas of service and phasing of infrastructure in the coastal planning area. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies foreach objective and shall identify regulatory or man- agement techniques for: 1. Limiting the specific impacts and cumulative impacts of development or redevelopment upon wetlands, water quality, water quantity, wildlife habitat, living marine resources, and beach and dune systems; 2. Restoration or enhancement of disturbed or degraded natural resources including beaches and dunes, estuaries, wetlands, and drainage systems; and programs to mitigate future dis- ruptions or degradations; 3. General hazard mitigation including regula- tion of building practices, floodplains, beach and dune alteration, stormwater management, sani- tary sewer and septic tanks, and land use to reduce the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards; and in- corporating the recommendations of the hazard mitigation annex of the local peacetime emer- gency plan and applicable existing interagency hazard mitigation reports. Incorporating recom- 38 VV -o.vrc L,oasrar mendations from interagency hazard mitigation reports shall be at the discretion of the local government; 4. Hurricane evacuation including methods to relieve deficiencies identified in the hurricane evacuation analysis, and procedures for integra- tion into the regional or local evacuation plan; 5. Post - disaster redevelopment including poli- cies to: distinguish between immediate repair and cleanup actions needed to protect public health and safety and long -term repair and re- development activities; address the removal, relocation, or structural modification of damaged infrastructure as determined appropriate by the local government but consistent with federal fund- ing provisions and unsafe structures; limiting redevelopment in areas of repeated damage; and, policies for incorporating the recommen- dations of interagency hazard mitigation reports, as deemed appropriate by the local government, into the local government's comprehensive plan when the plan is revised during the evaluation and appraisal process; 6. Identifying areas needing redevelopment, in- cluding eliminating unsafe conditions and inap- propriate uses as opportunities arise; 7. Designating coastal high- hazard areas and limiting development in these areas; 8. The relocation, mitigation or replacement, as deemed appropriate by the local government, of infrastructure presently within the coastal high - hazard area when state funding is anticipated to be needed. 9. Establishing priorities for shoreline land uses, providing for siting water- dependent and water - related uses, establishing performance stan- dards for shoreline development, and establish- ing criteria for marina siting, including criteria consistent with the countywide marina siting plan if adopted by the local government, which address: land use compatibility, availability of upland support services, existing protective sta- tus or ownership, hurricane contingency plan- ning, protection of water quality, water depth, environmental disruptions and mitigation actions, availability for public use, and economic need and feasibility; 10. Providing, continuing, and replacing adequate physical public access to beaches and shore- lines; enforcing public access to beaches renourished at public expense; enforcing the public access requirements of the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1985; and providing transpor- tation or parking facilities for beach and shore- line access; 11. Historic resource protection, including his- toric site identification and establishing perfor- mance standards for development and sensitive reuse of historic resources; 12. The orderly development and use of deepwater ports, if applicable, including how the local government shall cooperate with the deepwater port to resolve problems in transpor- tation, land use, natural and man -made hazards, and protection of natural resources. Include a procedure to resolve inconsistencies between the local government comprehensive plan and the deepwater port master plan through the dis- pute resolution process as provided under s. 186.509, Florida Statutes, which is to be uti- lized in the event the local government and a deepwater port are unable to resolve the incon- sistencies; 13. Ensuring that required infrastructure is avail- able to serve the development or redevelopment in the coastal planning area at the densities pro- posed by the future land use plan, consistent with coastal resource protection and safe evacu- ation, by assuring that funding for infrastructure will be phased to coincide with the demands generated by development or redevelopment; 14. Protecting estuaries which are within the jurisdiction of more than one local government, including methods for coordinating with other local governments to ensure adequate sites for water - dependent uses, prevent estuarine pollu- tion, control surface water runoff, protect living marine resources, reduce exposure to natural hazards, and ensure public access; and 15. Demonstrating how the local government will coordinate with existing resource protection plans such as resource planning and manage- ment plans, aquatic preserve management plans, and estuarine sanctuary plans. (4) Local governments within the coastal area that par- ticipate in a countywide marina siting plan shall include the marina siting plan as part of this element. with the plans of the appropriate local government; de- termination of compliance does not imply conceptual approval by the State for permitting purposes. (5) Port Master Plans for Deepwater Ports. A port mas- ter plan shall be prepared by or for each deepwater port for the purposes of coordinating the activities of the port 39 (a) Deepwater ports shall prepare a port master plan and submit it to the appropriate local government for incorporation as a part of the coastal management element at least six months prior to the due date of the local government's comprehensive plan estab- lished pursuant to law. This port master plan shall be incorporated as a part of the coastal manage- ment element, and be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the coastal management element. The port master plan of a deepwater port, as it appears in the coastal management element, shall be reviewed for compliance with the criteria below. Failure of a deepwater port which is not a part of the local government to submit a deepwater port master plan shall not cause the local govern- ment to be subject to the sanctions in Sections 163.3184 or 163.3167, Florida Statutes, nor cause the regional planning council to prepare the missing port master plan. In this case the deepwater port shall not have its in -water facilities exempted from the provisions of Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and the port shall be subject to the sanctions in Sections 163.3184 and 163.3167, Florida Statutes. The failure of a deepwater port which is an agency of a local governmentto prepare a deepwater port mas- ter plan may result in the sanctions in Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, being applied and the missing deepwater port master plan being prepared by the regional planning council. Regardless of whether a deepwater port has prepared a port mas- ter plan, any port development shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the coastal management element of the jurisdiction in which the development occurs. (b) Inventories and Analyses. The deepwater port shall prepare all applicable inventories and analy- ses listed in Subsection (2) for the areas they own or administer. Furthermore, the deepwater port shall inventory and analyze: landside transportation needed to support the deepwater port, in -water fa- cilities, maintenance of in -water facilities, manage- ment of dredged material, hazardous material han- dling and cleanup, and handling and cleanup of pe- troleum products. In addition, the deepwater port shall prepare a map showing the location and bound- aries of port owned or administered lands. (c) Goals, Objectives, and Policies. The deepwater port shall develop goals, objectives, and policies to address the applicable issues listed in Subsection (3). The goals, objectives, and policies shall be con- sistent with the goals adopted in the remainder of the coastal management element. (d) Port Maintenance and Expansion. The deepwater port shall set forth its plans for future port expansion for an initial five -year period and in -water facility maintenance for at least a ten -year period, and these plans shall show the economic assumptions used, the foreseeable changes in shipping technologies and port operations, the estimates of types and vol- umes of commodities to be handled, the needed expansions to in -water and on -land facilities, and the infrastructure required. The plan shall set forth requirements for maintaining in -water facilities and for the management of dredged material from both maintenance and expansion. The plan shall assess the impact of port expansion and maintenance on wetlands, beaches and dunes, submerged lands, floodplains, wildlife habitat, living marine resources, water quality, water quantity, public access, historic resources, and the land use and infrastructure of adjacent areas. (e) Port Master Plan Integration into the Coastal Man- agement Element. If a port master plan is prepared by a deepwater port, then the appropriate local gov- ernment shall include the port master plan's goals, objectives, and policies and port maintenance and expansion sections in the coastal management ele- ment of its comprehensive plan. The data and analy- ses shall be summarized as required in Subsection 9J- 5.012(2), and shall be submitted in support of the comprehensive plan. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(g), (8), (9), (10), 163.3178 FS. History—New 3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,3-23-94. 9J -5.013 Conservation Element. The purpose of the conservation element is to promote the conservation, use and protection of natural resources. (1) Conservation Data and Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data and analy- ses requirements pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) The following natural resources, where present within the local government's boundaries, shall be identified and analyzed: 1. Rivers, bays, lakes, wetlands including es- tuarine marshes, groundwaters and air, includ- ing information on quality of the resource avail- 40 gJ -5 -n13 Cnncanmfinn Flame able from and classified by the Florida Depart ment of Environmental Regulation; 2. Floodplains; 3. Known sources of commercially valuable min erals; 4. Areas known by the local soil and water con- servation district to have experienced soil ero- sion problems; and 5. Areas which are the location of recreationally and commercially important fish or shellfish, wildlife, marine habitats, and vegetative commu- nities including forests, indicating known domi- nant species present and species listed by fed- eral, state, or local government agencies as endangered, threatened or species of special concern. (b) For each of the above natural resources, existing commercial, recreational or conservation uses, known pollution problems including hazardous wastes and the potential for conservation, use or protection shall be identified. (c) Current and projected water needs and sources for the next ten -year period based on the demands for industrial, agricultural, and potable water use and the quality and quantity of water available to meet these demands shall be analyzed. The analysis shall consider existing levels of water conservation, use and protection and applicable policies of the regional water management district. (2) Requirements for Conservation Goals, Objectives and Policies. (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end toward which conservation programs and activities are ulti- mately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(6)(d), Florida Statutes, and which: 1. Protect air quality; 2. Conserve, appropriately use and protect the quality and quantity of current and projected water sources and waters that flow into estua- rine waters or oceanic waters; 3. Conserve, appropriately use and protect min- erals, soils and native vegetative communities including forests; and 4. Conserve, appropriately use and protect fish- eries, wildlife, wildlife habitat and marine habi- tat. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address implementation activities for the: 1. Protection of water quality by restriction of activities and land uses known to affect adversely the quality and quantity of identified water sources, including natural groundwater recharge areas, wellhead protection areas and surface waters used as a source of public water supply; 2. Conservation, appropriate use and protection of areas suitable for extraction of minerals; 3. Protection of native vegetative communities from destruction by development activities; 4. Emergency conservation of water sources in accordance with the plans of the regional water management district; 5. Restriction of activities known to adversely affect the survival of endangered and threatened wildlife; 6. Protection and conservation of the natural functions of existing soils, fisheries, wildlife habi- tats, rivers, bays, lakes, floodplains, harbors, wetlands including estuarine marshes, freshwater beaches and shores, and marine habitats; 7. Protection of existing natural reservations iden- tified in the recreation and open space element; 8. Continuing cooperation with adjacent local governments to conserve, appropriately use, or protect unique vegetative communities located within more than one local jurisdiction; 9. Designation of environmentally sensitive lands for protection based on locally determined crite- ria which further the goals and objectives of the conservation element; and 10. Management of hazardous wastes to pro- tect natural resources. 9J -5.014 Recreation and Open Space wovernmental Coordination Element (a) Wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands shall be protected and conserved. The adequate and appropriate protection and conservation of wetlands shall be accomplished through a comprehensive plan- ning process which includes consideration of the types, values, functions, sizes, conditions and lo- cations of wetlands, and which is based on support- ing data and analysis. (b) Future land uses which are incompatible with the protection and conservation of wetlands and wet- land functions shall be directed away from wetlands. The type, intensity or density, extent, distribution and location of allowable land uses and the types, values, functions, sizes, conditions and locations of wetlands are land use factors which shall be con- sidered when directing incompatible land uses away from wetlands. Land uses shall be distributed in a manner that minimizes the effect and impact on wetlands. The protection and conservation of wet- lands by the direction of incompatible land uses away from wetlands shall occur in combination with other goals, objectives and policies in the comprehensive plan. Where incompatible land uses are allowed to occur, mitigation shall be considered as one means to compensate for loss of wetlands functions. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177, 163.3178 FS. History—New 3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,5-18-94. 9J -5.014 Recreation and Open Space. (3) Policies Addressing the Protection and Conservation of Wetlands. 41 Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (5), (6)(e), (8), (9), (10) FS. History—New 3-6-86, Amended 10- 20 -86, Repealed2- 20.96. 9J -5.015 Intergovernmental Coordination Element. It is the purpose of the intergovernmental coordination element to identify and resolve incompatible goals, ob- jectives, policies and development proposed in local gov- ernment comprehensive plans and to determine and re- spond to the needs for coordination processes and pro- cedures with adjacent local governments, and regional and state agencies. Intergovernmental coordination shall be utilized to the extent required to carry out the provi- sions of this Chapter. (1) Intergovernmental Coordination Data Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data pur- suant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). The area of concern for municipalities shall include adjacent municipalities, the W-O.V/J county, and counties adjacent to the municipality. The area of concern for counties shall include all municipali- ties within the county, adjacent counties, and adjacent municipalities. (a) All adjacent governments, school boards and other units of local government providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of land, independent special districts, water manage- ment districts, regional planning agencies, and state agencies with which the local government coordi- nates shall be inventoried. This inventory shall also include regional or state agencies with land use or environmental regulatory authority, and authorities, independent special districts, and utility companies, which provide services within the local jurisdiction. (b) For each entity listed in Paragraph (1)(a), the element shall briefly describe the existing coordina- tion mechanisms indicating the subject, the nature of the relationship and the office with primary re- sponsibility for coordination. (2) Intergovernmental Coordination Analysis Require- ments. The element shall be based upon the following analyses requirements which support the comprehen- sive plan pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) The effectiveness of existing coordination mecha- nisms described in Paragraph (1)(b), such as inter- governmental agreements, joint planning and ser- vice agreements, special legislation and joint meet- ings or work groups which are used to further inter- governmental coordination; (b) Specific problems and needs within each of the comprehensive plan elements which would benefit from improved oradditional intergovernmental coor- dination and means for resolving those problems and needs; (c) Growth and development proposed in compre- hensive plans in the area of concern and a compari- son with the appropriate comprehensive regional policy plan in order to evaluate the needs for addi- tional planning coordination; and (d) The comprehensive plan's coordination with the rules, principlesfor guiding development, and devel- opment regulations in any designated area of criti- cal state concern falling partially or wholly within the local government's jurisdiction. (3) Requirements for Intergovernmental Coordination Goals, Objectives, and Policies. 42 Coordination Element (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end toward which intergovernmental coordination activities are ultimately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement, which address the requirementsof Paragraph 163.31T7(6)(h), Florida Statutes, and which: 1. Coordinate the comprehensive plan with the plans of school boards, other units of local gov- ernment providing services but not having regu- latory authority over the use of land, and with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipali- ties, the county, and adjacent counties; 2. Ensure that the local government addresses through coordination mechanisms the impacts of development proposed in the local compre- hensive plan upon development in adjacent mu- nicipalities, the county, adjacent counties, the region and in the state; 3. Ensure coordination in establishing level of service standards for public facilities with any state, regional or local entity having operational and maintenance responsibility for such facili- ties; 4. Ensure coordination in the designation of new dredge spoil disposal sites for counties and mu- nicipalities located in the coastal area having spoil disposal responsibilities. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address programs, activi- ties, or procedures for: 1. The coordination of planning activities man- dated by the various elements of the compre- hensive plan with other local governments, school boards, other units of local government providing services but not having regulatory au- thority over the use of land, the region, and the state; 2. Resolving conflicts with other local govern- ments through the regional planning council's informal mediation process; 3. The provision of services and information; 4. Resolving annexation issues; 5. Reviewing the relationship of proposed devel- opment of the area to the existing comprehen- sive plans of adjacent local governments; 6. Consistent and coordinated management of certain bays, estuaries and harbors that fall un- der the jurisdiction of more than one local gov- ernment in the case of local governments re- quired to prepare a coastal management ele- ment; 9J -5.016 Capital Improvements Element ments pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) The element shall be based on the public facility needs as identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and shall support the future land use ele- ment. Transportation facilities include facilities iden- tified as existing or projected needs in any of the following elements: traff ic circulation; mass transit; and port, aviation and related facilities. 7. The review of development proposed in the comprehensive plan including a policy statement (b) The geographic service area and location of ma- indicating relationships of the proposed devel- jor system components for the public education and opment to the existing comprehensive plans of public health systems within the local government's adjacent local governments; jurisdiction shall be identified. 8. Involving the navigation and inlet districts and other appropriate state and federal agencies and the public in providing for or identifying dredge spoil disposal sites for the counties and munici- palities in the coastal area with spoil disposal responsibilities; and 9. Resolving conflicts between a coastal local government and a public agency seeking a dredge spoil disposal site through the Coastal Resources Interagency Management Committee's dispute resolution process. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (f 0) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(1), (4), (5), (6)(h), (8), (9), (10) FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,3-23-94,3-21- 99. 9J -5.016 Capital Improvements Element. The purpose of the capital improvements element is to evaluate the need for public facilities as identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and as defined in the applicable definitions for each type of public facility, to estimate the cost of improvements for which the local government has fiscal responsibility, to analyze the fis- cal capability of the local government to finance and con- struct improvements, to adopt financial policies to guide the funding of improvements and to schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a manner neces- sary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required based on needs identified in the other comprehensive plan elements. The element shall also include the requirements to ensure that an adequate concurrency management system will be implemented by local governments pursuantto Rule 9J- 5.0055 of this Chapter. (c) Existing revenue sources and funding mecha- nisms available for capital improvement financing, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state funds, fed- eral funds, gas taxes and impact fees shall be in- ventoried. (2) Capital Improvements Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following analyses which support the comprehensive plan pursuantto Sub- section 9J- 5.005(2). (1) Capital Improvements Data Requirements. The ele- ment shall be based upon the following data require - 43 (a) Current local practices that guide the timing and location of construction, extension or increases in capacity of each public facility; (b) The general fiscal implications of the existing deficiencies and future needs for each type of public facility. This analysis shall be based on the needed improvements, as identified in the other local gov- ernment comprehensive plan elements, and shall address the relative priority of need among facility types, and shall support the future land use element; (c) The costs of needed capital improvements for mitigation of existing deficiencies, replacement and new growth needs pursuant to the future land use element and shall explain the basis of cost esti- mates; (d) The impact of new or improved public educational and public health care systems and facilities on the provision of infrastructure; (e) The use of timing and location of capital improve- ments to public facilities to support efficient land development and goals, objectives, and policies in the future land use element. This analysis must take into consideration plans of state agencies and wa- ter management districts that provide public facili- ties within the local government jurisdiction; and (f) An assessment of the local government's ability to finance capital improvements based upon antici- pated population and revenues including: 1. Forecasting of revenues and expenditures for five years; 2. Projections of debt service obligations for cur- rently outstanding bond issues; 3. Projection of ad valorem tax base, assess- ment ratio and millage rate; 4. Projections of other tax bases and other rev- enue sources such as impact and user fees; 5. Projection of operating cost considerations; and 6. Projection of debt capacity (3) Requirements for Capital Improvements Goals, Ob- jectives, and Policies. (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end for the timely and efficient provision of public facilities through the use of sound fiscal policies. (b) The element shall contain one or more objec- tives for each goal and shall address: 1. The use of the capital improvements element as a means to meet the needs of the local gov- ernment for the construction of capital facilities necessary to meet existing deficiencies, to ac- commodate desired future growth and to replace obsolete or worn -out facilities; 2. The limitation of public expenditures that sub- sidize development in high hazard coastal ar- eas; 3. The coordination of land use decisions and available or projected fiscal resources with a schedule of capital improvements which main- tains adopted level of service standards and meets the existing and future facility needs; 4. The extent to which future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by the development in order to ad- equately maintain adopted level of service stan- dards; and 5. The demonstration of the local government's ability to provide or require provision of the 44 yo -a.ura capirai improvements Element needed improvements identified in the other lo- cal government comprehensive plan elements and to manage the land development process so that public facility needs created by previ- ously issued development orders or future de- velopment do not exceed the ability of the local government to fund and provide or require provi- sion of the needed capital improvements. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address programs and ac- tivities for: 1. The establishment of criteria used to evalu- ate local capital improvement projects. Such criteria shall be directly related to the individual elements of the comprehensive plan and shall include consideration of: a. The elimination of public hazards b. The elimination of existing capacity defi- cits; c. Local budget impact; d. Locational needs based on projected growth patterns; e. The accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands; f. Financial feasibility; and g. Plans of state agencies and water man- agement districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction; 2. The management of debt, such as: a. The limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt; b. The maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue; and c. The maximum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax base; 3. The establishment of policies forthe replace- ment and renewal of capital facilities; 4. The establishment of level of service stan- dards for public facilities which are within the local government's jurisdiction, as provided by Subsection 9J- 5.005(3) and Subparagraph 9J- 5.015(3)(b)3. of this Chapter. These standards shall be those found in the other local govern - ment comprehensive plan elements; 5. Provisions for the availability of public facili- ties to serve developments for which develop- ment orders were issued prior to the adoption of the comprehensive plan; 6. Provisions for the availability of public facili- ties and services needed to support develop- ment concurrent with the impacts of such de- velopment subsequent to the adoption of the local comprehensive plan. Public facility and service availability shall be deemed sufficient if the pub- lic facilities and services for a development are phased, or the development is phased, so that the public facilities and those related services which are deemed necessary by the local gov- ernment to operate the facilities necessitated by that development, are available concurrent with the impacts of the development; 7. Provisions for the adoption of a capital bud- get as a part of the annual budgeting process; 8. Assessing new developments a pro rata share of the costs necessary to finance public facility improvements necessitated by development in order to adequately maintain adopted level of service standards; and 9. The use of local government fiscal policies to direct expenditures for capital improvements which recognize the policies of the other com- prehensive plan elements. 9J -5.018 Optional Elements Only for the purpose of determining the financial feasibility of the capital improvements element, projected revenue sources may include a local government's present intent to increase the level or amount of a revenue source which is contin- gent on ratification by public referendum. If the local government utilizes these projected rev- enue sources for planning purposes, the local government is encouraged to include in the plan policies which identify alternatives and actions to be undertaken should the referendum fail. If a local government utilizes projected revenue sources which require a referendum and the plan does not include policies to identify alternatives and actions to be taken if the referendum fails, the plan must include a policy that the local government will amend the plan to include poli- cies to identify alternative funding sources or other actions should the referendum fail. How- ever, for the purpose of issuing development or- ders and permits, the local government must have a concurrency management system which meets the requirements of Rule 9J- 5.0055(2) of this Chapter. (b) The plan shall identify those programs to be adopted which will ensure thatthe goals, objectives and policies established in the capital improvements element are met or exceeded. These programs shall include provisions that facilities and services at least meet the standards established and are available concurrent with the impacts of development. At a minimum the programs related to concurrency shall meet the requirements of Rule 9J- 5.0055 of this Chapter. (4) Requirements for Capital Improvements Implementa- (5) Requirements for Monitoring and Evaluation. In addi- tion. tion to the general monitoring and evaluation requirements in this Chapter, this element shall be reviewed on an (a) The comprehensive plan shall contain: annual basis. 1. The schedule of capital improvements, for which the local government has fiscal responsi- bility, selected for the first five fiscal years, by year, after the adoption of the comprehensive plan, which shall reflect the need to reduce ex- isting deficiencies, remain abreast of replace- ments, and to meet future demand including: a. Project description and general location; and b. Determination of consistency with individual comprehensive plan elements. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), (10) FS. Law Implemented 163,3177(1),(3),(5)'(8),(9), (10) FS. History— New3 -6 -86, Amended 10-20-86,11-22-89,4-2- 92, 3- 23 -94. 9J -5.018 Optional Elements. Specific Authority 163.3177(9) FS. Law Implemented 163.3177(l),(5), (7), (8), (9) FS. History—New 3 -6 -86, Amended 10- 20 -86, Repealed 2- 20-96. 2. A list of projected costs and revenue sources by type of public facility for the five year period. 45 9J -5.019 Transportation Element. (1) APPLICATION AND PURPOSE. A local government which has all or part of its jurisdiction included within the urban area of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) pursuant to Section 339.175, F.S., shall prepare and adopt a transportation element consistent with the provi- sions of this Rule and Chapter 163, Part ll, F.S. Local governments that are not located within the urban area of a MPO shall adopt traffic circulation, mass transit, and ports, aviation and related facilities elements con- sistent with the provisions of this rule and Chapter 163, F.S., Part II, F.S., except that local governments with a population of 50,000 or less, as determined under Sec- tion 186.901, F.S., shall not be required to prepare mass transit or ports, aviation and related facilities elements. Within a designated MPO area, the transportation ele- ments of the local plans shall be coordinated with the long range transportation plan of the MPO. The purpose of the transportation element shall be to plan for a multimodal transportation system that places emphasis on public transportation systems. (2) EXISTING TRANSPORTATION DATA REQUIRE- MENTS. The element shall be based upon the following data requirements pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2) of this Chapter. (a) The general location of the following transporta- tion system features shall be shown on an existing transportation map or map series: 1. Road System: a. Collector roads; b. Arterial roads; c. Limited and controlled access facilities; d. Significant Parking facilities, as determined by the local government. 2. Public Transit System: a. Public transit routes or service areas; b. Public transit terminals and transfer sta- tions; c. Public transit rights -of -way and exclusive public transit corridors; 3. Significant bicycle and pedestrian ways, as determined by the local government; 4. Port facilities; M Element 5. Airport facilities including clear zones and ob- structions; 6. Freight and passenger rail lines and termi- nals; and 7. Intermodal terminals and access to intermodal facilities; 8. The existing functional classification and maintenance responsibility for all roads; 9. The number of through lanes for each road- way; 10. The major public transit trip generators and attractors based upon the existing land use map or map series; 11. Designated local and regional transportation facilities, critical to the evacuation of the coastal population prior to an impending natural disas- ter. (b) The existing transportation map or map series shall identify the following: 1. Existing peak hour, peak direction levels of service for roads and mass transit facilities and corridors or routes; and 2. Capacity of significant parking facilities and duration limitations (long -term or short- term), where applicable. (3) TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS. The element shall be based upon the following analyses which address all modes of transportation and support the comprehensive plan pursuant to Subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) An analysis of the existing transportation sys- tem levels of service and system needs based upon existing design and operating capacities; most re- cently available estimates for average daily and peak hour vehicle trips; existing modal split and vehicle occupancy rates; existing public transit facilities, including ridership by route, peak hour capacities and headways; population characteristics, includ- ing transportation disadvantaged; and the existing characteristics of the major trip generators and attractors within the community. (b) An analysis of the availability of transportation facilities and services to serve existing land uses. (c) An analysis of the adequacy of the existing and projected transportation system to evacuate the coastal population prior to an impending natural di- saster. (d) An analysis of the growth trends and travel pat- terns and interactions between land use and trans- portation, and the compatibility between the future land use and transportation elements, including land use compatibility around airports. (e) An analysis of existing and projected intermodal deficiencies and needs such as terminals, connec- tions, high occupancy vehicle lanes, part-and -ride lots and other facilities. (f) An analysis of the projected transportation sys- tem levels of service and system needs based upon the future land use categories, including their densi- ties or intensities of use as shown on the future land use map or map series, and the projected integrated transportation system. The analysis shall demon- strate integration and coordination among the vari- ous modes of transportation, including rail, airport and seaport facilities. The analysis shall address the need for new facilities and expansions of alter- native transportation modes to provide a safe and efficient transportation network and enhance mobil- ity. The methodologies used in the analysis, includ- ing the assumptions used, modeling applications, and alternatives considered shall be included in the plan support document. The analysis shall address the effect of transportation concurrency management areas, if any, pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(5), F.A.C., and the effect of transportation concurrency excep- tions, if any, pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(6) and (7). (g) The analysis shall consider the projects planned for in the Florida Department of Transportation's Adopted Work Program, long range transportation plan and transportation improvement program of the metropolitan planning organization, and the local transportation authority(ies), if any, and compatibil- ity with the policies and guidelines of such plans. (h) The analysis shall demonstrate how the local government will maintain its adopted level of service standards for roads and transit facilities within its jurisdiction and how the level of service standards reflect and advance the purpose of this section and the goals, objectives, and policies of the future land use element and other elements of the comprehen- sive plan. (i) The analysis shall explicitly address and docu- ment the internal consistency of the plan, especially 9J -5.019 Transportation Element its provisions addressing transportation, land use, and availability of facilities and services. Q) An analysis which identifies land uses and trans- portation management programs necessary to pro- mote and support public transportation systems in designated public transportation corridors. (4) REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. 47 (a) The element shall contain one or more goal state- ments which establish the long -term end toward which transportation programs and activities are ul- timately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Subsection 163.3177(6)(b), (6)6), (7)(a), and (7)(b), F.S., and which: 1. Provide for a safe, convenient, and energy efficient multimodal transportation system; 2. Coordinate the transportation system with the future land use map or map series and ensure that existing and proposed population densities, housing and employment patterns, and land uses are consistent with the transportation modes and services proposed to serve these areas; 3. Coordinate the transportation system with the plans and programs of any applicable metro- politan planning organization, transportation authority, Florida Transportation Plan and Florida Department of Transportation's Adopted Work Program; and 4. Address the provision of efficient public tran- sit services based upon existing and proposed major trip generators and attractors, safe and convenient public transit terminals, land uses and accommodation of the special needs of the transportation disadvantaged. 5. Provide for the protection of existing and fu- ture rights -of -way from building encroachment. 6. Coordinate the siting of new, or expansion of existing, ports, airports, or related facilities with the future land use, coastal management, and conservation elements; 7. Coordinate the surface transportation access to ports, airports, or related facilities with the traffic circulation system shown on the traffic circulation maps or map series; 8. Coordinate with any ports, airports, or related facilities plans of the appropriate ports, airports or related facilities provider, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Aviation Adminis- tration, metropolitan planning organization, mili- tary services, or resource planning and man- agement plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., and approved by the Governor and Cabi- net, the Florida Department of Transportation 5- Year Transportation Plan, and the Continuing Florida Aviation System Planning Process as adopted; and 9. Ensure that access routes to ports, airports, or related facilities are properly integrated with other modes of surface or water transportation. (c) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which address implementation activities for the: 1. Establishment of level of service standards at peak hour for roads and public transit facilities within the local government's jurisdiction. For facilities on the Florida Intrastate Highway Sys- tem as defined in Section 338.001, F.S., the local governments shall adopt the level of ser- vice standards established by the Department of Transportation by rule. For all other facilities on the future traffic circulation map, local gov- ernments shall adopt adequate level of service standards. These level of service standards shall be adopted to ensure that adequate facility ca- pacity will be provided to serve the existing and future land uses as demonstrated by the sup- porting data and analysis in the comprehensive plan; 2. Control of the connections and access points of driveways and roads to roadways; 3. Establishment of parking strategies that will promote transportation goals and objectives; 4. For existing orfuture transportation rights -of- way and corridors designated in the local gov- ernment comprehensive plan, establish mea- sures for their acquisition, preservation, or pro- tection; 5. Establishment of land use and other strate- gies to promote the use of bicycles and walk- ing; 48 9J -5.019 Trancnnrf�finn CIn f 6. Establishment of transportation demand man- agement programs to modify peak hour travel demand and reducethe numberof vehicle miles traveled per capita within the community and region, 7. Establishment of transportation system man- agement strategies as appropriate to improve system efficiency and enhance safety; 8. Coordination of roadway and transit service improvements with the future needs of seaports, airports, and other related public transportation facilities; 9. Establishment of land use, site and building design guidelines for development in exclusive public transit corridors to assure the accessibil- ity of new development to public transit; 10. Establishment of numerical indicators against which the achievement of the mobility goals of the community can be measured, such as modal split, annual transit trips per capita, automobile occupancy rates; 11. Establishment of strategies, agreements and other mechanisms with applicable local govern- ments and regional and state agencies that dem- onstrate the areawide coordination necessary to implement the transportation, land use, park- ing and other provisions of the transportation element; 12. A coordinated and consistent policy with the future land use element to encourage land uses which promote public transportation in designated public transportation corridors; 13. Establishment of strategies to facilitate lo- cal traffic to use alternatives to the Florida Intr- astate Highway System to protect its interre- gional and intrastate functions; 14. Development of strategies to address intermodal terminals and access to airport, rail and seaport facilities; 15. Provision of safe and convenient on -site traf- fic flow, considering needed motorized and non - motorized vehicle parking; 16. Establishment of measures for the acquisi- tion and preservation of existing and future pub- lic transit rights -of -way and exclusive public tran- sit corridors; 9J -5.021 Consistency of Local Government Comprehensive Plans With Com- prehensive Regional Policy Plana and With the State Comprehensive Plan; c. Limited and controlled access facilities; Specific Authority 163.3177FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177, 163.3178FS. d. Local roads, if being used to achieve mobil- History— New3- 23 -94, Amended 3- 21 -99. ity goals; e. Parking facilities that are required to achieve 9J -5.021 Consistency of Local Government Compre- 17. Promotion of ports, airports, and related fa- 5. Significant bicycle and pedestrian facilities; -- cilities development and expansion consistent with the future land use, coastal management, 6. Port facilities; and conservation elements; 7. Airport facilities including clearzones and ob- 18. Mitigation of adverse structural and non- structions; structural impacts from ports, airports, or related facilities upon adjacent natural resources and 8. Freight and passenger rail lines; and land uses; 9. Intermodal terminals and access to such fa- 19. Protection and conservation of natural re- cilities. sources within ports, airports and related facili- ties; (b) The future transportation map or map series shall identify the following: 20. Coordinated intermodal management of sur- face and water transportation within ports, air- 1. The functional classification and maintenance ports and related facilities; and responsibility for all roads; 21. Protection of ports, airports, or related facili- 2. The number of proposed through lanes for ties from the encroachment of incompatible land each roadway; uses. 3. The major public transit trip generators and (5) FUTURE TRANSPORTATION MAP. attractors based upon the future land use map or map series; (a) The general location of the following transporta- tion system proposed features shall be shown on 4. Projected peak hour levels of service for all the future transportation map or map series: transportation facilities for which level of service standards are established; and 1. Road System: 5. Designated local and regional transportation a. Collector roads; facilities critical to the evacuation of coastal population prior to an impending natural disas- b. Arterial roads; ter. c. Limited and controlled access facilities; Specific Authority 163.3177FS. Lawlmplemented 163.3177, 163.3178FS. d. Local roads, if being used to achieve mobil- History— New3- 23 -94, Amended 3- 21 -99. ity goals; e. Parking facilities that are required to achieve 9J -5.021 Consistency of Local Government Compre- mobility goals; hensive Plans With Comprehensive Regional Policy Plans and With the State Comprehensive Plan. 2. Public transit system: Specific Authority 163.3177(9)(c), (10) FS. a. Public transit routes or services areas; Lawlmplemented 163.3177(3), (4), (6), (7),(9)(C), (10), 163.3178 FS, Chapter 85 -57, Laws of Florida, Section b. Public transit terminals and transfer sta- 2. tions; History—New 3-6-86, Amended 10- 20 -86, Repealed 2- 20-96. c. Public transit rights -of -way and exclusive public transit corridors; 9J -5.022 Standards for Review of Required Land 3. Transportation concurrency management ar- Development Regulations. eas pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(5), F.A.C., if any; (1) In determining whether a local government has to- 4. Transportation concurrency exception areas tally failed to adopt one or more land development regu- pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(6), F.A.C., if any; lations required in Subsection 163.3202(2), F.S., the 49 Department shall examine the regulation or regulations in question to ensure that specific programs, activities, standards, actions or prohibitions which regulate or gov- ern the subjects are included. The provisions described below are provided as examples to lend guidance to lo- cal governments in accordance with accepted and ap- plied principles of comprehensive planning; however, in- novative land development regulations are encouraged as well. (a) The subdivision of land, including provisions which meet the requirements of Chapter 177, Part I, F.S., and include review procedures, design and develop- ment standards, provisions for adequate public fa- cilities, mitigation of development impacts, land dedi- cations, fees, and administrative provisions. (b) The implementation of the land use categories in the Future Land Use Element consistent with the future land use map and goals, objectives and poli- cies, including provisions for ensuring appropriate densities and intensities, compatible adjacent land uses and providing for open spaces. (c) The control of land uses and activities that may affect potable water wells and wellfields, including identified cones of influence, in order to protect the potable water supply. (d) The control of areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding which may include the type, loca- tion, density and intensity of land uses located within these areas, in order to provide for drainage and stormwater management and mitigate the impacts of floods, including loss of life and property damage. Adequate drainage facilities may be provided to con- trol individual and cumulative impacts of flooding and nonpoint source pollution in drainage basins exist- ing wholly or in part within the jurisdiction. (e) The protection of environmentally sensitive lands, as designated in the comprehensive plan, from de- velopment impacts, including ensuring the protec- tion of soils, groundwater, surface water, shorelines, fisheries, vegetative communities and wildlife habi- tat. (f) The regulation of signage, including but not lim- ited to type, location, size, number and maintenance. (g) Provisions assuring that development orders shall not be issued unless public facilities and services which meet or exceed the adopted level of service standards are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. Unless public facilities and ser- vices which meet or exceed such standards are avail- able at the time the development permit is issued, 9J -5.023 Criteria for Determining Consistencv of Land with development orders shall be specifically conditioned upon availability of the public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Pub- lic facility and service availability shall be deemed sufficient if the public facilities and services for a development are phased, or the development is phased, so that the public facilities and those re- lated services which are deemed necessary by the local government to operate the facilities necessi- tated by that development are available and meet the adopted level of service standards concurrent with the impacts of the development. Phased facili- ties and services to be provided by the local govern- ment shall be included in the Capital Improvements Element. Public facilities and services to be pro- vided by the developer shall be guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, including de- velopment agreements pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., or agreements or development orders is- sued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S. (h) The number and sizes of on -site parking spaces, and the design of and control mechanisms for on- site vehicular and pedestrian traffic to provide for public safety and convenience. (i) Other specific and detailed provisions necessary to implement the adopted comprehensive plan, in- cluding regulations which are specifically required in the objectives and policies of the adopted com- prehensive plan. (2) If, in the determination of the local governing body, existing regulatory provisions as applied in the jurisdic- tion by other agencies (whether federal, state, regional or local) are sufficient to meet the requirements of Sub- section 163.3202(2), F.S., the local government may in- corporate these regulatory provisions by specific refer- ence in whole or in part into the single land development code to avoid duplication of the language. The Depart- ment shall examine any such provision adopted by ref- erence in determining whether a local government has totally failed to adopt one or more land development regu- lations required in Subsection 163.3202(2), F.S. Specific Authority 163.3202(5) FS. Lawimplemented 163.3177(10)(h), 163.3194, 163.3202 FS. History— New3- 21 -99. 9J -5.023 Criteria for Determining Consistency of Land Development Regulations with the Comprehensive Plan. A determination of consistency of a land development regulation with the comprehensive plan will be based 50 9.14.025 Public School Facilities Element for Public School Concurrence upon the following: wishing to adopt an optional educational element which is not for the purpose of imposing school concurrency (1) Characteristics of land use and development allowed are not required to comply with these minimum criteria. by the regulation in comparison to the land use and de- velopment proposed in the comprehensive plan. Factors (1) Definitions applicable to 9J- 5.025. which will be considered include: (a) type of land use; (b) intensity and density of land use; (c) location of land use; (d) extent of land use; and (e) other aspects of development, including impact on natural resources. (2) Whether the land development regulations are com- patible with the comprehensive plan, furtherthe compre- hensive plan, and implement the comprehensive plan. The term "compatible" means that the land development regulations are not in conflict with the comprehensive plan. The term "further" means that the land develop- ment regulations take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the comprehensive plan. (3) Whether the land development regulations include provisions that implement objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan that require implementing regula- tions in order to be realized, including provisions imple- menting the requirement that public facilities and ser- vices needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of such development. Specific Authority 163.3202(5) FS. Law Implemented 163.3194, 163.3213 FS. History— New3- 21 -99. 9.1-5.025 Public School Facilities Element for Pub- lic School Concurrency. Public school concurrency may be imposed by local option. If the school board and the local governments within the school district choose to adopt public school concurrency, each local government must adopt a pub- lic school facilities element which meets the minimum criteria of this section. Public school concurrency is in- tended to ensure that the capacity of schools is suffi- cient to support development at the adopted level of ser- vice standard. These minimum criteria are intended to assure coordination between local governments and the school board in planning and permitting development and in building and adding capacity to schools so that school capacity at the adopted level of service standard at the time of the impacts of development. Local governments 51 (a) "Ancillary Plant" has the meaning described in section 235.011 (1), Florida Statutes. (b) "Appropriate level of service standard" means school facilities adequate for the purpose of provid- ing education for the projected enrollment that can be achieved and maintained throughout each year of the five -year planning period. (c) "Educational Plant Survey" has the meaning de- scribed in section 235.011(7), Florida Statutes. (d) "FISH" means Florida Inventory of School Houses and has the meaning described in Section 235.15, Florida Statutes. (e) "Public school concurrency service area" or "concurrency service area" means the geographic unit adopted by the local governments within which school concurrency is applied and determined. (2) Data and Analysis Requirements. The element shall be based upon the following data and analysis require- ments pursuant to subsection 9J- 5.005(2). (a) For each school facility: the existing enrollment, existing school attendance zones, existing FISH capacity or other professionally accepted measure of capacity; surplus capacity based on the site size requirements contained within Department of Edu- cation design criteria, and existing level of service, utilizing the five -year school district facilities work program adopted pursuant to section 235.185, Florida Statutes, and the educational plant survey. (b) For each school facility: the projected enrollment by year for the initial five years of the planning pe- riod, and projected enrollment district -wide by school type for the end of the long range planning period of the host county, based on projected population. (c) Existing and projected school facility surpluses and deficiencies by concurrency service area by year for the five -year planning period, and district -wide by school type for the end of the long range planning period of the host county based on projected enroll- ment. (d) An analysis of the adequacy of the existing level of service conditions for each school facility in order to develop appropriate level of service standards. 9J -5.025 Public School Facilities Element few Puhffe (e) School facilities needed for each concurrency service area to accommodate projected enrollment at the adopted level of service standard each year for the five -year planning period, and forthe end of the long range planning period of the host county, including ancillary plants and land area requirements. The plan shall explain the relationship, if any, of the ancillary plants to school concurrency. (f) Analysis of problems and opportunities with ex- isting public school facilities and projected public school facilities planned in the adopted district fa- cilities work program, including location, supporting infrastructure, and overcrowding in relation to achiev- ing and maintaining level of service standards for the five -year planning period and for the end of the long range planning period of the host county, including: opportunities and problems in collocating existing projected public school facilities with other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers; the need for supporting infrastructure, in- cluding, water, sewer, roads, drainage, sidewalks and bus stops for existing and projected public school facilities; and analysis of opportunities to lo- cate public school facilities to serve as community focal points. (g) Existing revenue sources and funding mecha- nisms available for school capital improvement fi- nancing; the estimated cost of addressing existing deficiencies and future needs identified above by year for the five -year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the host county. (h) The estimated cost of needed school capital im- provements to correct deficiencies and meet future needs based on achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standard identified by year for the five -year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the host county. (i) An assessment of the ability to finance capital improvements based upon projected enrollment and revenues during the five -year planning period: fore- casting of revenues and expenditures for five years; projections of debt service obligations for currently outstanding bond issues; projection of ad valorem tax base, assessment ratio and millage rate; pro- jections of other tax bases and other revenue sources, such as, impact and user fees; projection of facilities (and not program) operating cost consid- erations; and projection of debt capacity. (j) Data and analysis showing how school concurrency costs will be met and shared by all affected parties, consistent with the requirement for 52 a financially feasible capital improvements program for public schools. (3) Requirements for Public School Facilities Goals, Objectives, and Policies. (a) The public school facilities element shall contain one or more adopted goal statements which estab- lish the long -term end toward which public school programs and activities are ultimately directed. (b) The element shall contain one or more specific objectives for each goal statement which address the requirements of Paragraph 163.3177(12)(d), F.S., and which: 1. Address correction of existing school facility deficiencies and facilities needed to meetfuture needs. 2. Ensure adequate school facility capacity con- sistent with the adopted level of service stan- dard for each year of the five -year planning pe- riod and the long term planning period of the host county. 3. Ensure the inclusion in the five -year sched- ule of capital improvements of those projects necessary to address existing deficiencies, and to meet future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service stan- dards for each year of the five -year planning pe- riod. 4. Coordinate the location of public schools with the future land use map or map series of the relevant jurisdiction to ensure that existing and proposed school facilities are located consis- tent with the existing and proposed residential areas they serve and are proximate to appropri- ate existing and future land uses. The use of schools to serve as community focal points should also be addressed. 5. Coordinate existing and planned public school facilities with the plans for supporting infrastruc- ture. 6. Coordinate location of public school facilities relative to the location of other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community cen- ters to the extent possible. (c) The element shall contain one or more adopted policies for each objective which establish the way in which programs and activities will be conducted to achieve an identified goal. At a minimum, the poli- cies shall include: 1. If the school concurrency service area is less than district -wide, a policy which establishes guidelines and standards for modification of school concurrency service areas and changes in the use of schools. The policy shall ensure that the adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five -year planning period. The policy shall include standards for revision of concurrency service area boundaries to ensure that the utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transporta- tion costs, court approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. 2. A policy which requires the adoption of an- nual plan amendments adding a new fifth year, updating the financially feasible public schools capital facilities program, coordinating the pro- gram with the 5 -year district facilities work plan, the plans of other local governments, and, as necessary, updates to the concurrency service area map. The annual plan amendments shall ensure that the capital improvements program continues to be financially feasible and that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained. 3. A policy addressing coordination of the an- nual review of the element with the school board, the county, and applicable municipalities; coor- dination of annual review of school enrollment projections, and establishing the proceduresfor the annual update process. 4. A policy addressing coordination of school site selection, permitting, and collocation of school sites with other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers. 5. A policy addressing provision of supporting infrastructure such as water and sewer, roads, drainage, sidewalks and bus stops for existing and projected public school facilities; and mea- sures to ensure compatibility and close integra- tion between public school facilities and sur- rounding land uses. 6. A policy addressing coordination of the long range public school facility map with the local governments comprehensive plan, including the future land use map. for Public 7. A policy establishing of level of service stan- dards for public school facilities which can be achieved and maintained throughout the five -year planning period. Local governments adopting level of service standards using a measurement of capacity other than FISH, shall include ap- propriate data and analysis in support of such alternative measure. 8. If concurrency is not applied district -wide, a policy providing that development can proceed if the level of service standard is exceeded for a project, but capacity exists in one or more con- tiguous school concurrency service areas as adopted by the local government. 9. Policies specifying types of mitigation that a school board will allow to meet concurrency, and policies assuring that any mitigation funds pro- vided as a result of the school concurrency sys- tem are utilized by the school board for appro- priate school facilities. 10. A policy establishing measures to ensure compatibility of school sites and surrounding land uses. 11. A policy addressing coordination with adja- cent local governments and the school district on emergency preparedness issues. (4) The element shall include the following maps: (a) A map or maps depicting existing location of public school facilities by type and existing location of ancillary plants. (b) A future conditions map or map series which depicts the planned general location of public school facilities and ancillary plants by year for the five - year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period of the host county. (c) When the school concurrency service area is less than district -wide, a map or map series which depicts the school concurrency service areas. Specific Authority 163.3177(9), 163.3180(13) FS, as amended by Chapter 98 -176, Laws of Florida. Law Implemented 163.3177(12), 163.3180(12) FS, as amended by Chapter 98 -176, Laws of Florida. History—New 10.20 -98. 53 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3164: Online Sunshine Page 1 of 5 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Titled Chapter-161 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; definitions. - -As used in this act: (1) "Administration Commission" means the Governor and the Cabinet, and for purposes of this chapter the commission shall act on a simple majority vote, except that for purposes of imposing the sanctions provided in s. 163.3184(l 1), affirmative action shall require the approval of the Governor and at least three other members of the commission. (2) "Area' or "area of jurisdiction" means the total area qualifying under the provisions of this act, whether this be all of the lands lying within the limits of an incorporated municipality, lands in and adjacent to incorporated municipalities, all unincorporated lands within a county, or areas comprising combinations of the lands in incorporated municipalities and unincorporated areas of counties. (3) "Coastal area" means the 35 coastal counties and all coastal municipalities within their boundaries designated coastal by the state land planning agency. (4) "Comprehensive plan" means a plan that meets the requirements of ss. 163.3177 and 163.3178. (5) "Developer" means any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any development as defined in this act. (6) "Development" has the meaning given it in s. 380.04. (7) "Development order" means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit. (8) "Development permit" includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the development of land. (9) "Governing body' means the board of county commissioners of a county, the commission or council of an incorporated municipality, or any other chief governing body of a unit of local government, however designated, or the combination of such bodies where joint utilization of the provisions of this act is accomplished as provided herein. http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 oraiureS or %—onsututton : vtew Jtatutes :- >6VU /- >UnUl03- >6ectton 3164 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 5 (10) "Governmental agency" means: (a) The United States or any department, commission, agency, or other instrumentality thereof. (b) This state or any department, commission, agency, or other instrumentality thereof. (c) Any local government, as defined in this section, or any department, commission, agency, or other instrumentality thereof. (d) Any school board or other special district, authority, or governmental entity. (11) "Land" means the earth, water, and air, above, below, or on the surface, and includes any improvements or structures customarily regarded as land. (12) "Land use" means the development that has occurred on the land, the development that is proposed by a developer on the land, or the use that is permitted or permissible on the land under an adopted comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof, land development regulations, or a land development code, as the context may indicate. (13) "Local government" means any county or municipality. (14) "Local planning agency" means the agency designated to prepare the comprehensive plan or plan amendments required by this act. 05) A "newspaper of general circulation" means a newspaper published at least on a weekly basis and printed in the language most commonly spoken in the area within which it circulates, but does not include a newspaper intended primarily for members of a particular professional or occupational group, a newspaper whose primary function is to carry legal notices, or a newspaper that is given away primarily to distribute advertising. (16) 'Parcel of land" means any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its locations and boundaries may be established, which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used, or developed as, a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. (17) 'Person' means an individual, corporation, governmental agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, two or more persons having a joint or common interest, or any other legal entity. (18) 'Public notice" means notice as required by s. 125.66(2) for a county or by s. 1hMal (3)(a) for a municipality. The public notice procedures required in this part are established as minimum public notice procedures. (19) 'Regional planning agency" means the agency designated by the state land planning agency to exercise responsibilities under law in a particular region of the state. http:// www.l eg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3164: Online Sunshine Page 3 of 5 _ (20) "State land planning agency" means the Department of Community Affairs. (21) "Structure" has the meaning given it by s. 3$0.0.31_(19). (22) "Land development regulation commission" means a commission designated by a local government to develop and recommend, to the local governing body, land development regulations which implement the adopted comprehensive plan and to review land development regulations, or amendments thereto, for consistency with the adopted plan and report to the governing body regarding its findings. The responsibilities of the land development regulation commission may be performed by the local planning agency. (23) "Land development regulations" means ordinances enacted by governing bodies for the regulation of any aspect of development and includes any local government zoning, rezoning, subdivision, building construction, or sign regulations or any other regulations controlling the development of land, except that this definition shall not apply in s. 163.3213. (24) 'Public facilities" means major capital improvements, including, but not limited to, transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities, and spoil disposal sites for maintenance dredging located in the intracoastal waterways, except for spoil disposal sites owned or used by ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b). (25) "Downtown revitalization" means the physical and economic renewal of a central business district of a community as designated by local government, and includes both downtown development and redevelopment. (26) "Urban redevelopment" means demolition and reconstruction or substantial renovation of existing buildings or infrastructure within urban infill areas, existing urban service areas, or community redevelopment areas created pursuant to part III. (27) "Urban infill' means the development of vacant parcels in otherwise built -up areas where public facilities such as sewer systems, roads, schools, and recreation areas are already in place and the average residential density is at least five dwelling units per acre, the average nonresidential intensity is at least a floor area ratio of 1.0 and vacant, developable land does not constitute more than 10 percent of the area. (28) 'Projects that promote public transportation" means projects that directly affect the provisions of public transit, including transit terminals, transit lines and routes, separate lanes for the exclusive use of public transit services, transit stops (shelters and stations), office buildings or projects that include fixed -rail or transit terminals as part of the building, and projects which are transit oriented and designed to complement reasonably proximate planned or existing public facilities. (29) 'Existing urban service area' means built-up areas where public facilities and services such as sewage treatment systems, roads, schools, and recreation areas are already in place. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & constitution :view Statutes :- >2UU7- >C'hU163- >Section 3164 :Online Sunshine Page 4 of 5 (30) "Transportation corridor management" means the coordination of the planning of designated future transportation corridors with land use planning within and adjacent to the corridor to promote orderly growth, to meet the concurrency requirements of this chapter, and to maintain the integrity of the corridor for transportation purposes. (31) "Optional sector plan" means an optional process authorized by s. 163,3245 in which one or more local governments by agreement with the state land planning agency are allowed to address development -of- regional- impact issues within certain designated geographic areas identified in the local comprehensive plan as a means of fostering innovative planning and development strategies in s. 163.3177(11)(a) and (b), furthering the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380, reducing overlapping data and analysis requirements, protecting regionally significant resources and facilities, and addressing extrajurisdictionalimpacts. (32) "financial feasibility" means that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first 3 years, or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of a 5 -year capital improvement schedule for financing capital improvements, such as ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees, and developer contributions, which are adequate to fund the projected costs of the capital improvements identified in the comprehensive plan necessary to ensure that adopted level -of- service standards are achieved and maintained within the period covered by the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements. A comprehensive plan shall be deemed financially feasible for transportation and school facilities throughout the planning period addressed by the capital improvements schedule if it can be demonstrated that the level -of- service standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the planning period even if in a particular year such improvements are not concurrent as required by s. 16180. (33) "Agricultural enclave" means an unincorporated, undeveloped parcel that: (a) Is owned by a single person or entity; (b) Has been in continuous use for bona fide agricultural purposes, as defined by s. 193.461, for a period of 5 years prior to the date of any comprehensive plan amendment application; (c) Is surrounded on at least 75 percent of its perimeter by: 1. Property that has existing industrial, commercial, or residential development; or 2. Property that the local government has designated, in the local government's comprehensive plan, zoning map, and future land use map, as land that is to be developed for industrial, commercial, or residential purposes, and at least 75 percent of such property is existing industrial, commercial, or residential development; (d) Has public services, including water, wastewater, transportation, schools, and recreation facilities, available or such public services are scheduled in the capital improvement element to be provided by http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3164 :Online Sunshine Page 5 of 5 the local government or can be provided by an alternative provider of local government infrastructure in order to ensure consistency with applicable concurrency provisions of s. 163.31_80; and (e) Does not exceed 1,280 acres; however, if the property is surrounded by existing or authorized residential development that will result in a density at buildout of at least 1,000 residents per square mile, then the area shall be determined to be urban and the parcel may not exceed 4,480 acres. History. - -s. 3, ch. 75 -257; s. 49, ch. 79.190; s. 10, ch. 81 -167; s. 10, ch. 83 -55; s. 2, ch. 85 -55; s. 3, ch. 92 -129; s. 2, ch. 93 -206; s. 2, ch. 95 -257; s. 22, ch. 95 -280; s. 7, ch. 95.310; s. 2, ch. 98 -176; s. 2, ch. 99 -378; s. 1, ch. 2005.290; s. 3, ch. 2006.255; s. 1, ch. 2007 -204. Copyright ® 1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • 2dyacyStatement • Contact Us http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_string =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 26 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapte[ INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive plan; studies and surveys. -- (1) The comprehensive plan shall consist of materials in such descriptive form, written or graphic, as may be appropriate to the prescription of principles, guidelines, and standards for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental, and fiscal development of the area. (2) Coordination of the several elements of the local comprehensive plan shall be a major objective of the planning process. The several elements of the comprehensive plan shall be consistent, and the comprehensive plan shall be financially feasible. Financial feasibility shall be determined using professionally accepted methodologies and applies to the 5 -year planning period, except in the case of a long -term transportation or school concurrency management system, in which case a 10 -year or 15 -year period applies. (3)(a) The comprehensive plan shall contain a capital improvements element designed to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient use of such facilities and set forth: 1. A component that outlines principles for construction, extension, or increase in capacity of public facilities, as well as a component that outlines principles for correcting existing public facility deficiencies, which are necessary to implement the comprehensive plan. The components shall cover at least a 5 -year period. 2. Estimated public facility costs, including a delineation of when facilities will be needed, the general location of the facilities, and projected revenue sources to fund the facilities. 3. Standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service. 4. Standards for the management of debt. 5. A schedule of capital improvements which includes publicly funded projects, and which may include privately funded projects for which the local government has no fiscal responsibility, necessary to ensure that adopted level -of- service standards are achieved and maintained. For capital improvements that will be funded by the developer, financial feasibility shall be demonstrated by being guaranteed in http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 OLMU ca M 1,U115L1LU11V11 : v lew 3taLULes : ->GVV - >l- nVlb�- >Jectlon 31 unilne Junshine Yage 2 of 20 an enforceable development agreement or interlocal agreement pursuant to paragraph (10)(h), or other enforceable agreement. These development agreements and interlocal agreements shall be reflected in the schedule of capital improvements if the capital improvement is necessary to serve development within the 5 -year schedule. If the local government uses planned revenue sources that require referenda or other actions to secure the revenue source, the plan must, in the event the referenda are not passed or actions do not secure the planned revenue source, identify other existing revenue sources that will be used to fund the capital projects or otherwise amend the plan to ensure financial feasibility. 6. The schedule must include transportation improvements included in the applicable metropolitan Planning organization's transportation improvement program adopted pursuant to S. 339.175(8) to the extent that such improvements are retied upon to ensure concurrency and financial feasibility. The schedule must also be coordinated with the applicable metropolitan planning organization's long -range transportation plan adopted pursuant to s. 339,175(7). (b)1. The capital improvements element must be reviewed on an annual basis and modified as necessary in accordance with s. 163.3187 or s. 163,9 in order to maintain a financially feasible 5 -year schedule of capital improvements. Corrections and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan may be accomplished by ordinance and shall not be deemed to be amendments to the local comprehensive plan. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the state land planning agency. An amendment to the comprehensive plan is required to update the schedule on an annual basis or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility listed in the 5 -year schedule. All public facilities must be consistent with the capital improvements element. Amendments to implement this section must be adopted and transmitted no later than December 1, 2008. Thereafter, a local government may not amend its future land use map, except for plan amendments to meet new requirements under this part and emergency amendments pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(a), after December 1, 2008, and every year thereafter, unless and until the local government has adopted the annual update and it has been transmitted to the state land planning agency. 2. Capital improvements element amendments adopted after the effective date of this act shall require only a single public hearing before the governing board which shall be an adoption hearing as described in s. 1163,11$(7). Such amendments are not subject to the requirements of s. 163.31s�4(3) -(6). (c) If the local government does not adopt the required annual update to the schedule of capital improvements, the state land planning agency must notify the Administration Commission. A local government that has a demonstrated lack of commitment to meeting its obligations identified in the capital improvements element may be subject to sanctions by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 163.3114(11). (d) If a local government adopts a long -term concurrency management system pursuant to s. 163.3180 (9), it must also adopt a long -term capital improvements schedule covering up to a 10 -year or 15 -year period, and must update the long -term schedule annually. The long -term schedule of capital improvements must be financially feasible. http: / /www.leg. state. fl- us /statuteslindex.cfm ?App mode= Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 26 (e) At the discretion of the local government and notwithstanding the requirements of this subsection, a comprehensive plan, as revised by an amendment to the plan's future land use map, shall be deemed to be financially feasible and to have achieved and maintained level -of- service standards as required by this section with respect to transportation facilities if the amendment to the future land use map is supported by a: 1. Condition in a development order for a development of regional impact or binding agreement that addresses proportionate -share mitigation consistent with s. ]_63.3184(12); or 2. Binding agreement addressing proportionate fair -share mitigation consistent with s. 163.318006)(f) and the property subject to the amendment to the future land use map is located within an area designated in a comprehensive plan for urban infill, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, urban infill and redevelopment, or an urban service area. The binding agreement must be based on the maximum amount of development identified by the future land use map amendment or as may be otherwise restricted through a special area plan policy or map notation in the comprehensive plan. (4)(a) Coordination of the local comprehensive plan with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region; with the appropriate water management district's regional water supply plans approved pursuant to s. 373_4361; with adopted rules pertaining to designated areas of critical state concern; and with the state comprehensive plan shall be a major objective of the local comprehensive planning process. To that end, in the preparation of a comprehensive plan or element thereof, and in the comprehensive plan or element as adopted, the governing body shall include a specific policy statement indicating the relationship of the proposed development of the area to the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region and to the state comprehensive plan, as the case may require and as such adopted plans or plans in preparation may exist. (b) When all or a portion of the land in a local government jurisdiction is or becomes part of a designated area of critical state concern, the local government shall clearly identify those portions of the local comprehensive plan that shall be applicable to the critical area and shall indicate the relationship of the proposed development of the area to the rules for the area of critical state concern. (5)(a) Each local government comprehensive plan must include at least two planning periods, one covering at least the first 5 -year period occurring after the plan's adoption and one covering at least a 10 -year period. (b) The comprehensive plan and its elements shall contain policy recommendations for the implementation of the plan and its elements. (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1) -(5) and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following elements: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, http: / /www.leg. state. fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lay_Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 ✓LULUI .J ax. �UIMLIwuvn . v lcw 3LdtULUN . -xvv .71 / / . Vmine Junsnme rage 4 OI Lb conservation, education, public buildings and grounds, other public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. Counties are encouraged to designate rural land stewardship areas, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (11)(d), as overlays on the future land use map. Each future land use category must be defined in terms of uses included, and must include standards to be followed in the control and distribution of population densities and building and structure intensities. The proposed distribution, location, and extent of the various categories of land use shall be shown on a land use map or map series which shall be supplemented by goals, policies, and measurable objectives. The future land use plan shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, including the amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth; the projected population of the area; the character of undeveloped land; the availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services; the need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community; the compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations; and, in rural communities, the need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. The future land use plan may designate areas for future planned development use involving combinations of types of uses for which special regulations may be necessary to ensure development in accord with the principles and standards of the comprehensive plan and this act. The future land use plan element shall include criteria to be used to achieve the compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands with military installations. In addition, for rural communities, the amount of land designated for future planned industrial use shall be based upon surveys and studies that reflect the need for job creation, capital investment, and the necessity to strengthen and diversify the local economies, and shall not be limited solely by the projected population of the rural community. The future land use plan of a county may also designate areas for possible future municipal incorporation. The land use maps or map series shall generally identify and depict historic district boundaries and shall designate historically significant properties meriting protection. For coastal counties, the future land use element must include, without limitation, regulatory incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial working waterfronts as defined in s. 342.07. The future land use element must clearly identify the land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use. When delineating the land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use, a local government shall include in the categories sufficient land proximate to residential development to meet the projected needs for schools in coordination with public school boards and may establish differing criteria for schools of different type or size. Each local government shall include lands contiguous to existing school sites, to the maximum extent possible, within the land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use. The failure by a local government to comply with these school siting requirements will result in the prohibition of the local government's ability to amend the local comprehensive plan, except for plan amendments described in s. 163 31U(1)(b), until the school siting requirements are met. Amendments proposed by a local government for purposes of identifying the land use categories in which public schools are an allowable use are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments contained in s. 1!3,3187. The future land use element shall include criteria that encourage the location of schools proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and shall require that the local government seek to collocate public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, with schools to the extent possible and to encourage the use of elementary schools as focal points for neighborhoods. For schools serving predominantly rural counties, defined as a county with a population of 100,000 or fewer, an agricultural land use category shall be http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 26 eligible for the location of public school facilities if the local comprehensive plan contains school siting criteria and the location is consistent with such criteria. Local governments required to update or amend their comprehensive plan to include criteria and address compatibility of adjacent or closely proximate lands with existing military installations in their future land use plan element shall transmit the update or amendment to the department by June 30, 2006. (b) A traffic circulation element consisting of the types, locations, and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares and transportation routes, including bicycle and pedestrian ways. Transportation corridors, as defined in s. 334.0 3, may be designated in the traffic circulation element pursuant to s. 3377,273, If the transportation corridors are designated, the local government may adopt a transportation corridor management ordinance. (c) A general sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural groundwater aquifer recharge element correlated to principles and guidelines for future land use, indicating ways to provide for future potable water, drainage, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and aquifer recharge protection requirements for the area. The element may be a detailed engineering plan including a topographic map depicting areas of prime groundwater recharge. The element shall describe the problems and needs and the general facilities that will be required for solution of the problems and needs. The element shall also include a topographic map depicting any areas adopted by a regional water management district as prime groundwater recharge areas for the Floridan or Biscayne aquifers. These areas shall be given special consideration when the local government is engaged in zoning or considering future land use for _ said designated areas. For areas served by septic tanks, soil surveys shall be provided which indicate the suitability of soils for septic tanks. Within 18 months after the governing board approves an updated regional water supply plan, the element must incorporate the alternative water supply project or projects selected by the local government from those identified in the regional water supply plan pursuant to s. 373.0361(2)(a) or proposed by the local government under s. 373.0361(7)(b). If a local government is located within two water management districts, the local government shall adopt its comprehensive plan amendment within 18 months after the later updated regional water supply plan. The element must identify such alternative water supply projects and traditional water supply projects and conservation and reuse necessary to meet the water needs identified in s. 373.03611(2)(a) within the Local government's jurisdiction and include a work plan, covering at least a 10 year planning period, for building public, private, and regional water supply facilities, including development of alternative water supplies, which are identified in the element as necessary to serve existing and new development. The work plan shall be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years within 18 months after the governing board of a water management district approves an updated regional water supply plan. Amendments to incorporate the work plan do not count toward the limitation on the frequency of adoption of amendments to the comprehensive plan. Local governments, public and private utilities, regional water supply authorities, special districts, and water management districts are encouraged to cooperatively plan for the development of multijurisdictional water supply facilities that are sufficient to meet projected demands for established planning periods, including the development of alternative water sources to supplement traditional sources of groundwater and surface water supplies. (d) A conservation element for the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air, water, water recharge areas, wetlands, waterwells, estuarine marshes, soils, beaches, http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 . ULULcN « �w)auiuuUi) . v icw OWLULGJ .- �wvi- JL.uVlo.J- ,>Jecuun -11 / / : Vnlme 3unsnine rage t) of zo shores, flood plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals, and other natural and environmental resources. Local governments shall assess their current, as well as projected, water needs and sources for at least a 10 -year period, considering the appropriate regional water supply plan approved pursuant to s. 373,0361, or, in the absence of an approved regional water supply plan, the district water management plan approved pursuant to s. 373.036(2). This information shall be submitted to the appropriate agencies. The land use map or map series contained in the future land use element shall generally identify and depict the following: 1. Existing and planned waterwells and cones of influence where applicable. 2. Beaches and shores, including estuarine systems. 3. Rivers, bays, lakes, flood plains, and harbors. 4. Wetlands. 5. Minerals and soils. The land uses identified on such maps shall be consistent with applicable state law and rules. (e) A recreation and open space element indicating a comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation, including, but not limited to, natural reservations, parks and playgrounds, parkways, beaches and public access to beaches, open spaces, waterways, and other recreational facilities. (f)1. A housing element consisting of standards, plans, and principles to be followed in: a. The provision of housing for all current and anticipated future residents of the jurisdiction. b. The elimination of substandard dwelling conditions. c. The structural and aesthetic improvement of existing housing. d. The provision of adequate sites for future housing, including affordable workforce housing as defined in s. 380,0651(3)(j), housing for low- income, very low - income, and moderate - income families, mobile homes, and group home facilities and foster care facilities, with supporting infrastructure and public facilities. e. Provision for relocation housing and identification of historically significant and other housing for purposes of conservation, rehabilitation, or replacement. f. The formulation of housing implementation programs. g. The creation or preservation of affordable housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in specific areas of the jurisdiction. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Sunshine Page 7 of 26 h. By July 1, 2008, each county in which the gap between the buying power of a family of four and the median county home sale price exceeds $170,000, as determined by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, and which is not designated as an area of critical state concern shall adopt a plan for ensuring affordable workforce housing. At a minimum, the plan shall identify adequate sites for such housing. For purposes of this sub - subparagraph, the term "workforce housing" means housing that is affordable to natural persons or families whose total household income does not exceed 140 percent of the area median income, adjusted for household size. i. Failure by a local government to comply with the requirement in sub - subparagraph h. will result in the local government being ineligible to receive any state housing assistance grants until the requirement of sub - subparagraph h. is met. The goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element must be based on the data and analysis prepared on housing needs, including the affordable housing needs assessment. State and federal housing plans prepared on behalf of the local government must be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the housing element. Local governments are encouraged to utilize job training, job creation, and economic solutions to address a portion of their affordable housing concerns. 2. To assist local governments in housing data collection and analysis and assure uniform and consistent information regarding the state's housing needs, the state land planning agency shall conduct an affordable housing needs assessment for all local jurisdictions on a schedule that coordinates the implementation of the needs assessment with the evaluation and appraisal reports required by s. 163.3191. Each local government shall utilize the data and analysis from the needs assessment as one basis for the housing element of its local comprehensive plan. The agency shall allow a local government the option to perform its own needs assessment, if it uses the methodology established by the agency by rule. (g)1. For those units of local government identified in s. 380,24, a coastal management element, appropriately related to the particular requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) and meeting the requirements of s. 163.317$(2) and (3). The coastal management element shall set forth the policies that shall guide the local government's decisions and program implementation with respect to the following objectives: a. Maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values. b. Continued existence of viable populations of all species of wildlife and marine life. c. The orderly and balanced utilization and preservation, consistent with sound conservation principles, of all living and nonliving coastal zone resources. d. Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable loss of coastal zone resources. e. Ecological planning principles and assumptions to be used in the determination of suitability and http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 vtuwu.6 a � UMLIiuuvu . v iow JlatulcJ J1 / / : Vntine 3unsmne rage 6 oI Lo extent of permitted development. f. Proposed management and regulatory techniques. g. Limitation of public expenditures that subsidize development in high- hazard coastal areas. h. Protection of human life against the effects of natural disasters. i. The orderly development, maintenance, and use of ports identified in S. 403.021(9) to facilitate deepwater commercial navigation and other related activities. j. Preservation, including sensitive adaptive use of historic and archaeological resources. 2. As part of this element, a local government that has a coastal management element in its comprehensive plan is encouraged to adopt recreational surface water use policies that include applicable criteria for and consider such factors as natural resources, manatee protection needs, protection of working waterfronts and public access to the water, and recreation and economic demands. Criteria for manatee protection in the recreational surface water use policies should reflect applicable guidance outlined in the Boat Facility Siting Guide prepared by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. If the local government elects to adopt recreational surface water use policies by comprehensive plan amendment, such comprehensive plan amendment is exempt from the provisions of s. 163-318 (1). Local governments that wish to adopt recreational surface water use policies may be eligible for assistance with the development of such policies through the Florida Coastal Management Program. The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability shall submit a report on the adoption of recreational surface water use policies under this subparagraph to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House of Representatives no later than December 1, 2010. (h)1. An intergovernmental coordination element showing relationships and stating principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of school boards, regional water supply authorities, and other units of local government providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of land, with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region, with the state comprehensive plan and with the applicable regional water supply plan approved pursuant to s. 3773,4341, as the case may require and as such adopted plans or plans in preparation may exist. This element of the local comprehensive plan shall demonstrate consideration of the particular effects of the local plan, when adopted, upon the development of adjacent municipalities, the county, adjacent counties, or the region, or upon the state comprehensive plan, as the case may require. a. The intergovernmental coordination element shall provide for procedures to identify and implement joint planning areas, especially for the purpose of annexation, municipal incorporation, and joint infrastructure service areas. b. The intergovernmental coordination element shall provide for recognition of campus master plans http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statutes /index. cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/512007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Sunshine Page 9 of 26 prepared pursuant to s. 1013.30._ c. The intergovernmental coordination element may provide for a voluntary dispute resolution process as established pursuant to s. 186.509 for bringing to closure in a timely manner intergovernmental disputes. A local government may develop and use an alternative local dispute resolution process for this purpose. 2. The intergovernmental coordination element shall further state principles and guidelines to be used in the accomplishment of coordination of the adopted comprehensive plan with the plans of school boards and other units of local government providing facilities and services but not having regulatory authority over the use of land. In addition, the intergovernmental coordination element shall describe joint processes for collaborative planning and decisionmaking on population projections and public school siting, the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, and siting facilities with countywide significance, including locally unwanted land uses whose nature and identity are established in an agreement. Within 1 year of adopting their intergovernmental coordination elements, each county, all the municipalities within that county, the district school board, and any unit of local government service providers in that county shall establish by interlocal or other formal agreement executed by all affected entities, the joint processes described in this subparagraph consistent with their adopted intergovernmental coordination elements. 3. To foster coordination between special districts and local general - purpose governments as local general- purpose governments implement local comprehensive plans, each independent special district must submit a public facilities report to the appropriate local government as required by s. 189.415. 4.a. Local governments must execute an interlocal agreement with the district school board, the county, and nonexempt municipalities pursuant to s. 163.._317Z7 The local government shall amend the intergovernmental coordination element to provide that coordination between the local government and school board is pursuant to the agreement and shall state the obligations of the local government under the agreement. b. Plan amendments that comply with this subparagraph are exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187 0). 5. The state land planning agency shall establish a schedule for phased completion and transmittal of plan amendments to implement subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. from all jurisdictions so as to accomplish their adoption by December 31, 1999. A local government may complete and transmit its plan amendments to carry out these provisions prior to the scheduled date established by the state land planning agency. The plan amendments are exempt from the provisions of s. 163,3187(l). 6. By January 1, 2004, any county having a population greater than 100,000, and the municipalities and special districts within that county, shall submit a report to the Department of Community Affairs which: a. Identifies all existing or proposed interlocal service delivery agreements regarding the following: http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lay_Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes az t-onstttution :view Statutes :- >2UU /- >ChU163- >Sectton 3177 :Online Suns... Page 10 of 26 education; sanitary sewer; public safety; solid waste; drainage; potable water; parks and recreation; and transportation facilities. b. Identifies any deficits or duplication in the provision of services within its jurisdiction, whether capital or operational. Upon request, the Department of Community Affairs shall provide technical assistance to the local governments in identifying deficits or duplication. 7. Within 6 months after submission of the report, the Department of Community Affairs shall, through the appropriate regional planning council, coordinate a meeting of all local governments within the regional planning area to discuss the reports and potential strategies to remedy any identified deficiencies or duplications. 8. Each local government shall update its intergovernmental coordination element based upon the findings in the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph 6. The report may be used as supporting data and analysis for the intergovernmental coordination element. (i) The optional elements of the comprehensive plan in paragraphs (7)(a) and (b) are required elements for those municipalities having populations greater than 50,000, and those counties having populations greater than 75,000, as determined under s. 186.941 (j) For each unit of local government within an urbanized area designated for purposes of s. 33 9.175, a transportation element, which shall be prepared and adopted in lieu of the requirements of paragraph (b) and paragraphs (7)(a), (b), (c), and (d) and which shall address the following issues: 1. Traffic circulation, including major thoroughfares and other routes, including bicycle and pedestrian ways. 2. All alternative modes of travel, such as public transportation, pedestrian, and bicycle travel. 3. Parking facilities. 4. Aviation, rail, seaport facilities, access to those facilities, and intermodal terminals. 5. The availability of facilities and services to serve existing land uses and the compatibility between future land use and transportation elements. 6. The capability to evacuate the coastal population prior to an impending natural disaster. 7. Airports, projected airport and aviation development, and land use compatibility around airports. 8. An identification of land use densities, building intensities, and transportation management programs to promote public transportation systems in designated public transportation corridors so as to encourage population densities sufficient to support such systems. 9. May include transportation corridors, as defined in s. 334.43, intended for future transportation http:// www.l eg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfin? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 11 of 26 facilities designated pursuant to s. 337.273. If transportation corridors are designated, the local government may adopt a transportation corridor management ordinance. (k) An airport master plan, and any subsequent amendments to the airport master plan, prepared by a licensed publicly owned and operated airport under s. 333.06 may be incorporated into the local government comprehensive plan by the local government having jurisdiction under this act for the area in which the airport or projected airport development is located by the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment. In the amendment to the local comprehensive plan that integrates the airport master plan, the comprehensive plan amendment shall address land use compatibility consistent with chapter 333 regarding airport zoning; the provision of regional transportation facilities for the efficient use and operation of the transportation system and airport; consistency with the local government transportation circulation element and applicable metropolitan planning organization long -range transportation plans; and the execution of any necessary interlocal agreements for the purposes of the provision of public facilities and services to maintain the adopted level -of- service standards for facilities subject to concurrency; and may address airport- related or aviation- related development. Development or expansion of an airport consistent with the adopted airport master plan that has been incorporated into the local comprehensive plan in compliance with this part, and airport - related or aviation- related development that has been addressed in the comprehensive plan amendment that incorporates the airport master plan, shall not be a development of regional impact. Notwithstanding any other general law, an airport that has received a development -of- regional- impact development order pursuant to s. 3MQ6, but which is no longer required to undergo development -of- regional- impact review pursuant to this subsection, may abandon its development -of- regional - impact order upon written notification to the applicable local government. Upon receipt by the local government, the development-of- regional- impact development order is void. (7) The comprehensive plan may include the following additional elements, or portions or phases thereof: (a) As a part of the circulation element of paragraph (6)(b) or as a separate element, a mass-transit element showing proposed methods for the moving of people, rights -of -way, terminals, related facilities, and fiscal considerations for the accomplishment of the element. (b) As a part of the circulation element of paragraph (6)(b) or as a separate element, plans for port, aviation, and related facilities coordinated with the general circulation and transportation element. (c) As a part of the circulation element of paragraph (6)(b) and in coordination with paragraph (6)(e), where applicable, a plan element for the circulation of recreational traffic, including bicycle facilities, exercise trails, riding facilities, and such other matters as may be related to the improvement and safety of movement of all types of recreational traffic. (d) As a part of the circulation element of paragraph (6)(b) or as a separate element, a plan element for the development of offstreet parking facilities for motor vehicles and the fiscal considerations for the accomplishment of the element. http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 . LOLULUe `x wusuwuvn . view oiaruies i- >�nvlo.r»ecnon 3111 : vnllne guns... rage 12 of 26 (e) A public buildings and related facilities element showing locations and arrangements of civic and community centers, public schools, hospitals, libraries, police and fire stations, and other public buildings. This plan element should show particularly how it is proposed to effect coordination with governmental units, such as school boards or hospital authorities, having public development and service responsibilities, capabilities, and potential but not having land development regulatory authority. This element may include plans for architecture and landscape treatment of their grounds. (f) A recommended community design element which may consist of design recommendations for land subdivision, neighborhood development and redevelopment, design of open space locations, and similar matters to the end that such recommendations may be available as aids and guides to developers in the future planning and development of land in the area. (g) A general area redevelopment element consisting of plans and programs for the redevelopment of slums and blighted locations in the area and for community redevelopment, including housing sites, business and industrial sites, public buildings sites, recreational facilities, and other purposes authorized by law. (h) A safety element for the protection of residents and property of the area from fire, hurricane, or manmade or natural catastrophe, including such necessary features for protection as evacuation routes and their control in an emergency, water supply requirements, minimum road widths, clearances around and elevations of structures, and similar matters. (i) An historical and scenic preservation element setting out plans and programs for those structures or Lands in the area having historical, archaeological, architectural, scenic, or similar significance. (j) An economic element setting forth principles and guidelines for the commercial and industrial development, if any, and the employment and personnel utilization within the area. The element may detail the type of commercial and industrial development sought, correlated to the present and projected employment needs of the area and to other elements of the plans, and may set forth methods by which a balanced and stable economic base will be pursued. (k) Such other elements as may be peculiar to, and necessary for, the area concerned and as are added to the comprehensive plan by the governing body upon the recommendation of the local planning agency. (l) Local governments that are not required to prepare coastal management elements under s. 163.3178 are encouraged to adopt hazard mitigation /postdisaster redevelopment plans. These plans should, at a minimum, establish long-term policies regarding redevelopment, infrastructure, densities, nonconforming uses, and future land use patterns. Grants to assist local governments in the preparation of these hazard mitigation /postdisaster redevelopment plans shall be available through the Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance Account in the Grants and Donations Trust Fund administered by the department, if such account is created by law. The plans must be in compliance with the requirements of this act and chapter 252. http: / /www.leg. state. fl. uslstatuteslindex.cfm ?App_mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 13 of 26 (8) All elements of the comprehensive plan, whether mandatory or optional, shall be based upon data appropriate to the element involved. Surveys and studies utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan shall not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, and supporting documents shall be made available to public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. (9) The state land planning agency shall, by February 15, 1986, adopt by rule minimum criteria for the review and determination of compliance of the local government comprehensive plan elements required by this act. Such rules shall not be subject to rule challenges under s. 120.56(2) or to drawout proceedings under s. 119,54(3)(c)2. Such rules shall become effective only after they have been submitted to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for review by the Legislature no later than 30 days prior to the next regular session of the Legislature. In its review the Legislature may reject, modify, or take no action relative to the rules. The agency shall conform the rules to the changes made by the Legislature, or, if no action was taken, the agency rules shall become effective. The rule shall include criteria for determining whether: (a) Proposed elements are in compliance with the requirements of part II, as amended by this act. (b) Other elements of the comprehensive plan are related to and consistent with each other. (c) The local government comprehensive plan elements are consistent with the state comprehensive plan and the appropriate regional policy plan pursuant to s. 186.508. (d) Certain bays, estuaries, and harbors that fall under the jurisdiction of more than one local government are managed in a consistent and coordinated manner in the case of local governments required to include a coastal management element in their comprehensive plans pursuant to paragraph (6)(g)• (e) Proposed elements identify the mechanisms and procedures for monitoring, evaluating, and appraising implementation of the plan. Specific measurable objectives are included to provide a basis for evaluating effectiveness as required by s. 1k3.3191 (f) Proposed elements contain policies to guide future decisions in a consistent manner. (g) Proposed elements contain programs and activities to ensure that comprehensive plans are implemented. (h) Proposed elements identify the need for and the processes and procedures to ensure coordination of all development activities and services with other units of local government, regional planning agencies, water management districts, and state and federal agencies as appropriate. The state land planning agency may adopt procedural rules that are consistent with this section and chapter 120 for the review of local government comprehensive plan elements required under this http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 atatutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 :Online Suns... Page 14 of 26 section. The state land planning agency shall provide model plans and ordinances and, upon request, other assistance to local governments in the adoption and implementation of their revised local government comprehensive plans. The review and comment provisions applicable prior to October 1, 1985, shall continue in effect until the criteria for review and determination are adopted pursuant to this subsection and the comprehensive plans required by s. 163.3167(2) are due. (10) The Legislature recognizes the importance and significance of chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, the Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance of the Department of Community Affairs that will be used to determine compliance of local comprehensive plans. The Legislature reserved unto itself the right to review chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, and to reject, modify, or take no action relative to this rule. Therefore, pursuant to subsection (9), the Legislature hereby has reviewed chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, and expresses the following legislative intent: (a) The Legislature finds that in order for the department to review local comprehensive plans, it is necessary to define the term "consistency." Therefore, for the purpose of determining whether local comprehensive plans are consistent with the state comprehensive plan and the appropriate regional policy plan, a local plan shall be consistent with such plans if the local plan is "compatible with" and "furthers" such plans. The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in conflict with the state comprehensive plan or appropriate regional policy plan. The term "furthers" means to take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the state or regional plan. For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with the state comprehensive plan or the appropriate regional policy plan, the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no specific goal and policy shall be construed or applied in isolation from the other goals and policies in the plans. (b) Each local government shall review all the state comprehensive plan goals and policies and shall address in its comprehensive plan the goals and policies which are relevant to the circumstances or conditions in its jurisdiction. The decision regarding which particular state comprehensive plan goals and policies will be furthered by the expenditure of a local government's financial resources in any given year is a decision which rests solely within the discretion of the local government. Intergovernmental coordination, as set forth in paragraph (6)(h), shall be utilized to the extent required to carry out the provisions of chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code. (c) The Legislature declares that if any portion of chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, is found to be in conflict with this part, the appropriate statutory provision shall prevail. (d) Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, does not mandate the creation, limitation, or elimination of regulatory authority, nor does it authorize the adoption or require the repeat of any rules, criteria, or standards of any local, regional, or state agency. (e) It is the Legislature's intent that support data or summaries thereof shall not be subject to the compliance review process, but the Legislature intends that goals and policies be clearly based on appropriate data. The department may utilize support data or summaries thereof to aid in its determination of compliance and consistency. The Legislature intends that the department may http: / /www.leg. state.tl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 15 of 26 evaluate the application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted. However, the department shall not evaluate whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, shall not be construed to require original data collection by local governments; however, local governments are not to be discouraged from utilizing original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. (f) The Legislature recognizes that under this section, local governments are charged with setting levels of service for public facilities in their comprehensive plans in accordance with which development orders and permits will be issued pursuant to s. 163.3202(2)(g). Nothing herein shall supersede the authority of state, regional, or local agencies as otherwise provided by law. (g) Definitions contained in chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, are not intended to modify or amend the definitions utilized for purposes of other programs or rules or to establish or limit regulatory authority. Local governments may establish alternative definitions in local comprehensive plans, as tong as such definitions accomplish the intent of this chapter, and chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code. (h) It is the intent of the Legislature that public facilities and services needed to support development shall be available concurrent with the impacts of such development in accordance with s. 163.3180. In meeting this intent, public facility and service availability shall be deemed sufficient if the public facilities and services for a development are phased, or the development is phased, so that the public facilities and those related services which are deemed necessary by the local government to operate the —. facilities necessitated by that development are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. The public facilities and services, unless already available, are to be consistent with the capital improvements element of the local comprehensive plan as required by paragraph (3)(a) or guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement. This shall include development agreements pursuant to this chapter or in an agreement or a development order issued pursuant to chapter 380. Nothing herein shall be construed to require a local government to address services in its capital improvements plan or to limit a local government's ability to address any service in its capital improvements plan that it deems necessary. (i) The department shall take into account the factors delineated in rule 9J- 5.002(2), Florida Administrative Code, as it provides assistance to local governments and applies the rule in specific situations with regard to the detail of the data and analysis required. (j) Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, has become effective pursuant to subsection (9). The Legislature hereby directs the department to adopt amendments as necessary which conform chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, with the requirements of this legislative intent by October 1, 1986. (k) So that local governments are able to prepare and adopt comprehensive plans with knowledge of the rules that will be applied to determine consistency of the plans with provisions of this part, it is the intent of the Legislature that there should be no doubt as to the legal standing of chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, at the close of the 1986 legislative session. Therefore, the Legislature declares that changes made to chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, prior to October 1, 1986, shall not be subject to rule challenges under s. 120.56(2), or to drawout proceedings under s. 120.54(3)(c)2. The http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 statutes nr l onstitutton :view Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 16 of 26 entire chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, as amended, shall be subject to rule challenges under s. 120.56(3), as nothing herein shall be construed to indicate approval or disapproval of any portion of chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, not specifically addressed herein. No challenge pursuant to s. 12056(3) may be filed from July 1, 1987, through April 1, 1993. Any amendments to chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, exclusive of the amendments adopted prior to October 1, 1986, pursuant to this act, shall be subject to the full chapter 120 process. All amendments shall have effective dates as provided in chapter 120 and submission to the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives shall not be required. (l) The state land planning agency shall consider land use compatibility issues in the vicinity of all airports in coordination with the Department of Transportation and adjacent to or in close proximity to all military installations in coordination with the Department of Defense. (11)(a) The Legislature recognizes the need for innovative planning and development strategies which will address the anticipated demands of continued urbanization of Florida's coastal and other environmentally sensitive areas, and which will accommodate the development of less populated regions of the state which seek economic development and which have suitable land and water resources to accommodate growth in an environmentally acceptable manner. The Legislature further recognizes the substantial advantages of innovative approaches to development which may better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agricultural and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for the cost - efficient delivery of public facilities and services. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the local government comprehensive plans and plan amendments adopted pursuant to the provisions of this part provide for a planning process which allows for land use efficiencies within existing urban areas and which also allows for the conversion of rural lands to other uses, where appropriate and consistent with the other provisions of this part and the affected local comprehensive plans, through the application of innovative and flexible planning and development strategies and creative land use planning techniques, which may include, but not be limited to, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area -based allocations, clustering and open space provisions, mixed -use development, and sector planning. (c) It is the further intent of the Legislature that local government comprehensive plans and implementing land development regulations shall provide strategies which maximize the use of existing facilities and services through redevelopment, urban infill development, and other strategies for urban revitalization. (d)1. The department, in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of Environmental Protection, water management districts, and regional planning councils, shall provide assistance to local governments in the implementation of this paragraph and rule 9J -5.006 (5)(1), Florida Administrative Code. Implementation of those provisions shall include a process by which the department may authorize local governments to designate all or portions of lands classified in the future land use element as predominantly agricultural, rural, open, open- rural, or a substantively equivalent land use, as a rural land stewardship area within which planning and economic incentives are applied to encourage the implementation of innovative and flexible planning and development http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us /statutes /index. cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 17 of 26 strategies and creative land use planning techniques, including those contained herein and in rule 9J- 5.006(5)(1), Florida Administrative Code. Assistance may include, but is not limited to: a. Assistance from the Department of Environmental Protection and water management districts in creating the geographic information systems land cover database and aerial photogrammetry needed to prepare for a rural land stewardship area; b. Support for local government implementation of rural land stewardship concepts by providing information and assistance to local governments regarding land acquisition programs that may be used by the local government or landowners to leverage the protection of greater acreage and maximize the effectiveness of rural land stewardship areas; and c. Expansion of the role of the Department of Community Affairs as a resource agency to facilitate establishment of rural land stewardship areas in smaller rural counties that do not have the staff or planning budgets to create a rural land stewardship area. 2. The department shall encourage participation by local governments of different sizes and rural characteristics in establishing and implementing rural land stewardship areas. It is the intent of the Legislature that rural land stewardship areas be used to further the following broad principles of rural sustainability: restoration and maintenance of the economic value of rural land; control of urban sprawl; identification and protection of ecosystems, habitats, and natural resources; promotion of rural economic activity; maintenance of the viability of Florida's agricultural economy; and protection of the character of rural areas of Florida. Rural land stewardship areas may be multicounty in order to encourage coordinated regional stewardship planning. 3. A local government, in conjunction with a regional planning council, a stakeholder organization of private land owners, or another local government, shall notify the department in writing of its intent to designate a rural land stewardship area. The written notification shall describe the basis for the designation, including the extent to which the rural land stewardship area enhances rural land values, controls urban sprawl, provides necessary open space for agriculture and protection of the natural environment, promotes rural economic activity, and maintains rural character and the economic viability of agriculture. 4. A rural land stewardship area shall be not less than 10,000 acres and shall be located outside of municipalities and established urban growth boundaries, and shall be designated by plan amendment. The plan amendment designating a rural land stewardship area shall be subject to review by the Department of Community Affairs pursuant to s. 163.3184 and shall provide for the following: a. Criteria for the designation of receiving areas within rural land stewardship areas in which innovative planning and development strategies may be applied. Criteria shall at a minimum provide for the following: adequacy of suitable land to accommodate development so as to avoid conflict with environmentally sensitive areas, resources, and habitats; compatibility between and transition from higher density uses to lower intensity rural uses; the establishment of receiving area service boundaries which provide for a separation between receiving areas and other land uses within the rural land http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_Strine =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 18 of 26 stewardship area through limitations on the extension of services; and connection of receiving areas with the rest of the rural land stewardship area using rural design and rural road corridors. b. Goals, objectives, and policies setting forth the innovative planning and development strategies to be applied within rural land stewardship areas pursuant to the provisions of this section. c. A process for the implementation of innovative planning and development strategies within the rural land stewardship area, including those described in this subsection and rule 9J- 5.006(5)(1), Florida Administrative Code, which provide for a functional mix of land uses, including adequate available workforce housing, including low, very-low and moderate income housing for the development anticipated in the receiving area and which are applied through the adoption by the local government of zoning and land development regulations applicable to the rural land stewardship area. d. A process which encourages visioning pursuant to s. 1613167(111 to ensure that innovative planning and development strategies comply with the provisions of this section. e. The control of sprawl through the use of innovative strategies and creative land use techniques consistent with the provisions of this subsection and rule 9J- 5.006(5)(1), Florida Administrative Code. 5. A receiving area shall be designated by the adoption of a land development regulation. Prior to the designation of a receiving area, the local government shall provide the Department of Community Affairs a period of 30 days in which to review a proposed receiving area for consistency with the rural Land stewardship area plan amendment and to provide comments to the local government. At the time of designation of a stewardship receiving area, a listed species survey will be performed. If listed species occur on the receiving area site, the developer shall coordinate with each appropriate local, state, or federal agency to determine if adequate provisions have been made to protect those species in accordance with applicable regulations. In determining the adequacy of provisions for the protection of Listed species and their habitats, the rural land stewardship area shall be considered as a whole, and the impacts to areas to be developed as receiving areas shall be considered together with the environmental benefits of areas protected as sending areas in fulfilling this criteria. 6. Upon the adoption of a plan amendment creating a rural land stewardship area, the local government shall, by ordinance, establish the methodology for the creation, conveyance, and use of transferable rural land use credits, otherwise referred to as stewardship credits, the application of which shall not constitute a right to develop land, nor increase density of land, except as provided by this section. The total amount of transferable rural land use credits within the rural land stewardship area must enable the realization of the long -term vision and goals for the 25 -year or greater projected population of the rural land stewardship area, which may take into consideration the anticipated effect of the proposed receiving areas. Transferable rural land use credits are subject to the following limitations: a. Transferable rural land use credits may only exist within a rural land stewardship area. b. Transferable rural land use credits may only be used on lands designated as receiving areas and then hnp: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 19 of 26 solely for the purpose of implementing innovative planning and development strategies and creative land use planning techniques adopted by the local government pursuant to this section. c. Transferable rural land use credits assigned to a parcel of land within a rural land stewardship area shall cease to exist if the parcel of land is removed from the rural land stewardship area by plan amendment. d. Neither the creation of the rural land stewardship area by plan amendment nor the assignment of transferable rural land use credits by the local government shall operate to displace the underlying density of land uses assigned to a parcel of land within the rural land stewardship area; however, if transferable rural land use credits are transferred from a parcel for use within a designated receiving area, the underlying density assigned to the parcel of land shall cease to exist. e. The underlying density on each parcel of land located within a rural land stewardship area shall not be increased or decreased by the local government, except as a result of the conveyance or use of transferable rural land use credits, as long as the parcel remains within the rural land stewardship area. f. Transferable rural land use credits shall cease to exist on a parcel of land where the underlying density assigned to the parcel of land is utilized. g. An increase in the density of use on a parcel of land located within a designated receiving area may occur only through the assignment or use of transferable rural land use credits and shall not require a plan amendment. h. A change in the density of land use on parcels located within receiving areas shall be specified in a development order which reflects the total number of transferable rural land use credits assigned to the parcel of land and the infrastructure and support services necessary to provide for a functional mix of land uses corresponding to the plan of development. i. Land within a rural land stewardship area may be removed from the rural land stewardship area through a plan amendment. j. Transferable rural land use credits may be assigned at different ratios of credits per acre according to the natural resource or other beneficial use characteristics of the land and according to the land use remaining following the transfer of credits, with the highest number of credits per acre assigned to the most environmentally valuable land or, in locations where the retention of open space and agricultural land is a priority, to such lands. k. The use or conveyance of transferable rural land use credits must be recorded in the public records of the county in which the property is located as a covenant or restrictive easement running with the land in favor of the county and either the Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, a water management district, or a recognized statewide land trust. 7. Owners of land within rural land stewardship areas should be provided incentives to enter into rural http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm ?App mode= Display_Statute &Search -String=... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 20 of 26 land stewardship agreements, pursuant to existing law and rules adopted thereto, with state agencies, water management districts, and local governments to achieve mutually agreed upon conservation objectives. Such incentives may include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Opportunity to accumulate transferable mitigation credits. b. Extended permit agreements. c. Opportunities for recreational leases and ecotourism. d. Payment for specified land management services on publicly owned land, or property under covenant or restricted easement in favor of a public entity. e. Option agreements for sale to public entities or private land conservation entities, in either fee or easement, upon achievement of conservation objectives. 8. The department shall report to the Legislature on an annual basis on the results of implementation of rural land stewardship areas authorized by the department, including successes and failures in achieving the intent of the Legislature as expressed in this paragraph. (e) The Legislature finds that mixed -use, high- density development is appropriate for urban infill and redevelopment areas. Mixed -use projects accommodate a variety of uses, including residential and commercial, and usually at higher densities that promote pedestrian- friendly, sustainable communities. The Legislature recognizes that mixed -use, high- density development improves the quality of life for residents and businesses in urban areas. The Legislature finds that mixed -use, high- density redevelopment and infill benefits residents by creating a livable community with alternative modes of transportation. Furthermore, the Legislature finds that local zoning ordinances often discourage mixed - use, high- density development in areas that are appropriate for urban infill and redevelopment. The Legislature intends to discourage single -use zoning in urban areas which often leads to lower- density, land - intensive development outside an urban service area. Therefore, the Department of Community Affairs shall provide technical assistance to local governments in order to encourage mixed -use, high - density urban infill and redevelopment projects. (f) The Legislature finds that a program for the transfer of development rights is a useful tool to preserve historic buildings and create public open spaces in urban areas. A program for the transfer of development rights allows the transfer of density credits from historic properties and public open spaces to areas designated for high- density development. The Legislature recognizes that high- density development is integral to the success of many urban infill and redevelopment projects. The Legislature intends to encourage high- density urban infill and redevelopment while preserving historic structures and open spaces. Therefore, the Department of Community Affairs shalt provide technical assistance to local governments in order to promote the transfer of development rights within urban areas for high - density infill and redevelopment projects. (g) The implementation of this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter, chapters http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us /statutes /index. cfm ?App_mode= Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 21 of 26 _ 186 and 187, and applicable agency rules. (h) The department may adopt rules necessary to implement the provisions of this subsection. (12) A public school facilities element adopted to implement a school concurrency program shall meet the requirements of this subsection. Each county and each municipality within the county, unless exempt or subject to a waiver, must adopt a public school facilities element that is consistent with those adopted by the other local governments within the county and enter the interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 16331777. (a) The state land planning agency may provide a waiver to a county and to the municipalities within the county if the capacity rate for all schools within the school district is no greater than 100 percent and the projected 5 -year capital outlay full -time equivalent student growth rate is less than 10 percent. The state land planning agency may allow for a single school to exceed the 100 - percent limitation if it can be demonstrated that the capacity rate for that single school is not greater than 105 percent. In making this determination, the state land planning agency shall consider the following criteria: 1. Whether the exceedance is due to temporary circumstances; 2. Whether the projected 5 -year capital outlay full time equivalent student growth rate for the school district is approaching the 10- percent threshold; 3. Whether one or more additional schools within the school district are at or approaching the 100 - percent threshold; and 4. The adequacy of the data and analysis submitted to support the waiver request. (b) A municipality in a nonexempt county is exempt if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for having no significant impact on school attendance: 1. The municipality has issued development orders for fewer than 50 residential dwelling units during the preceding 5 years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25 additional public school students during the preceding 5 years. 2. The municipality has not annexed new land during the preceding 5 years in land use categories that permit residential uses that will affect school attendance rates. 3. The municipality has no public schools located within its boundaries. (c) A public school facilities element shall be based upon data and analyses that address, among other items, how level -of- service standards will be achieved and maintained. Such data and analyses must include, at a minimum, such items as: the interlocal agreement adopted pursuant to s. 163.31777 and the 5 -year school district facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35; the educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.31 and an existing educational and ancillary plant map or map http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 22 of 26 series; information on existing development and development anticipated for the next 5 years and the long -term planning period; an analysis of problems and opportunities for existing schools and schools anticipated in the future; an analysis of opportunities to collocate future schools with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers; an analysis of the need for supporting public facilities for existing and future schools; an analysis of opportunities to locate schools to serve as community focal points; projected future population and associated demographics, including development patterns year by year for the upcoming 5 -year and long -term planning periods; and anticipated educational and ancillary plants with land area requirements. (d) The element shall contain one or more goals which establish the long -term end toward which public school programs and activities are ultimately directed. (e) The element shall contain one or more objectives for each goal, setting specific, measurable, intermediate ends that are achievable and mark progress toward the goal. (f) The element shall contain one or more policies for each objective which establish the way in which programs and activities will be conducted to achieve an identified goal. (g) The objectives and policies shall address items such as: t. The procedure for an annual update process; 2. The procedure for school site selection; 3. The procedure for school permitting; 4. Provision for infrastructure necessary to support proposed schools, including potable water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, transportation, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization; 5. Provision for colocation of other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, in proximity to public schools; 6. Provision for location of schools proximate to residential areas and to complement patterns of development, including the location of future school sites so they serve as community focal points; 7. Measures to ensure compatibility of school sites and surrounding land uses; 8. Coordination with adjacent local governments and the school district on emergency preparedness issues, including the use of public schools to serve as emergency shelters; and 9. Coordination with the future land use element. (h) The element shall include one or more future conditions maps which depict the anticipated location of educational and ancillary plants, including the general location of improvements to existing schools or http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 23 of 26 new schools anticipated over the 5 -year or long -term planning period. The maps will of necessity be general for the long -term planning period and more specific for the 5 -year period. Maps indicating general locations of future schools or school improvements may not prescribe a land use on a particular parcel of land. (i) The state land planning agency shall establish a phased schedule for adoption of the public school facilities element and the required updates to the public schools intertocal agreement pursuant to s. 163.31777. The schedule shall provide for each county and local government within the county to adopt the element and update to the agreement no later than December 1, 2008. Plan amendments to adopt a public school facilities element are exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). (j) Failure to adopt the public school facilities element, to enter into an approved interlocal agreement as required by subparagraph (6)(h)2. and s. 163.31777, or to amend the comprehensive plan as necessary to implement school concurrency, according to the phased schedule, shall result in a local government being prohibited from adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan which increase residential density until the necessary amendments have been adopted and transmitted to the state Land planning agency. (k) The state land planning agency may issue the school board a notice to show cause why sanctions should not be enforced for failure to enter into an approved interlocal agreement as required by s. 163.31777 or for failure to implement the provisions of this act relating to public school concurrency. The school board may be subject to sanctions imposed by the Administration Commission directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board an equivalent amount of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 191.3_6_5, 1013,68, 1013,70, and 101 (13) Local governments are encouraged to develop a community vision that provides for sustainable growth, recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. At the request of a local government, the applicable regional planning council shall provide assistance in the development of a community vision. (a) As part of the process of developing a community vision under this section, the local government must hold two public meetings with at least one of those meetings before the local planning agency. Before those public meetings, the local government must hold at least one public workshop with stakeholder groups such as neighborhood associations, community organizations, businesses, private property owners, housing and development interests, and environmental organizations. (b) The local government must, at a minimum, discuss five of the following topics as part of the workshops and public meetings required under paragraph (a): 1. Future growth in the area using population forecasts from the Bureau of Economic and Business Research; 2. Priorities for economic development; http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lav_Statute &Search_Strin¢ =... 9/5/2007 JlalulCS M k_.unstttuuon :view statutes : ->Iuu /- >LnuIb -i- »ectton .i t / / : Unitne Suns... Page 24 of 26 3. Preservation of open space, environmentally sensitive lands, and agricultural lands; 4. Appropriate areas and standards for mixed -use development; 5. Appropriate areas and standards for high - density commercial and residential development; 6. Appropriate areas and standards for economic development opportunities and employment centers; 7. Provisions for adequate workforce housing; 8. An efficient, interconnected multimodal transportation system; and 9. Opportunities to create land use patterns that accommodate the issues listed in subparagraphs 1. -8. (c) As part of the workshops and public meetings, the local government must discuss strategies for addressing the topics discussed under paragraph (b), including: 1. Strategies to preserve open space and environmentally sensitive lands, and to encourage a healthy agricultural economy, including innovative planning and development strategies, such as the transfer of development rights; 2. Incentives for mixed -use development, including increased height and intensity standards for buildings that provide residential use in combination with office or commercial space; 3. Incentives for workforce housing; 4. Designation of an urban service boundary pursuant to subsection (2); and 5. Strategies to provide mobility within the community and to protect the Strategic Intermodal System, including the development of a transportation corridor management plan under s. 337.273. (d) The community vision must reflect the community's shared concept for growth and development of the community, including visual representations depicting the desired land use patterns and character of the community during a 10 -year planning timeframe. The community vision must also take into consideration economic viability of the vision and private property interests. (e) After the workshops and public meetings required under paragraph (a) are held, the local government may amend its comprehensive plan to include the community vision as a component in the plan. This plan amendment must be transmitted and adopted pursuant to the procedures in ss. 163.3184 and 163.3189 at public hearings of the governing body other than those identified in paragraph (a). (f) Amendments submitted under this subsection are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments in s. 163.3187. (g) A local government that has developed a community vision or completed a visioning process after http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_string =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 25 of 26 July 1, 2000, and before July 1, 2005, which substantially accomplishes the goals set forth in this subsection and the appropriate goals, policies, or objectives have been adopted as part of the comprehensive plan or reflected in subsequently adopted land development regulations and the plan amendment incorporating the community vision as a component has been found in compliance is eligible for the incentives in s. 163.3184(17). (14) Local governments are also encouraged to designate an urban service boundary. This area must be appropriate for compact, contiguous urban development within a 10 -year planning timeframe. The urban service area boundary must be identified on the future land use map or map series. The local government shall demonstrate that the land included within the urban service boundary is served or is planned to be served with adequate public facilities and services based on the local government's adopted level -of- service standards by adopting a 10 -year facilities plan in the capital improvements element which is financially feasible. The local government shall demonstrate that the amount of land within the urban service boundary does not exceed the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population growth at densities consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan within the 10- year planning timeframe. (a) As part of the process of establishing an urban service boundary, the local government must hold two public meetings with at least one of those meetings before the local planning agency. Before those public meetings, the local government must hold at least one public workshop with stakeholder groups such as neighborhood associations, community organizations, businesses, private property owners, housing and development interests, and environmental organizations. (b)1. After the workshops and public meetings required under paragraph (a) are held, the local government may amend its comprehensive plan to include the urban service boundary. This plan amendment must be transmitted and adopted pursuant to the procedures in ss. 163.3184 and 163.3189 at meetings of the governing body other than those required under paragraph (a). 2. This subsection does not prohibit new development outside an urban service boundary. However, a local government that establishes an urban service boundary under this subsection is encouraged to require a full - cost - accounting analysis for any new development outside the boundary and to consider the results of that analysis when adopting a plan amendment for property outside the established urban service boundary. (c) Amendments submitted under this subsection are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments in s. 163.3187. (d) A local government that has adopted an urban service boundary before July 1, 2005, which substantially accomplishes the goals set forth in this subsection is not required to comply with paragraph (a) or subparagraph 1. of paragraph (b) in order to be eligible for the incentives under s. 163,_31_$4(17). In order to satisfy the provisions of this paragraph, the local government must secure a determination from the state land planning agency that the urban service boundary adopted before July 1, 2005, substantially complies with the criteria of this subsection, based on data and analysis submitted by the local government to support this determination. The determination by the state land planning agency is http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3177 : Online Suns... Page 26 of 26 not subject to administrative challenge. History. - -s. 7, ch. 75 -257; s. 1, ch. 77 -174; s. 1, ch. 80 -154; s. 6, ch. 83 -308; s. 1, ch. 85 -42; s. 6, ch. 85 -55; s. 1, ch. 85 -309; s. 7, ch. 86 -191; s. 5, ch. 92 -129; s. 6, ch. 93 -206; s. 898, ch. 95 -147; s. 3, ch. 95.257; s. 4, ch. 95 -322; s. 10, ch. 95 -341; s. 10, ch. 96 -320; s. 24, ch. 96 -410; s. 2, ch. 96.416; s. 2, ch. 98 -146; s. 4, ch. 98 -176; s. 4, ch. 98 -258; s. 90, ch. 99 -251; s. 3, ch. 99 -378; s. 40, ch. 2001 -201; s. 64, ch. 2001 -279; s. 24, ch. 2002 -1; s. 58, ch. 2002 -20; s. 70, ch. 2002 -295; s. 2, ch. 2002 -296; s. 904, ch. 2002 -387; s. 61, ch. 2003 -286; s. 2, ch. 2004.230; s. 4, ch. 2004 -372; s. 2, ch. 2004 -381; s. 2, ch. 2005- 36; s. 1, ch. 2005 -157; s. 2, ch. 2005 -290; s. 10, ch. 2005.291; s. 2, ch. 2006.220; s. 57, ch. 2007 -196; s. 1, ch. 2007 -198; s. 2, ch. 2007 -204. Copyright © 1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 31777 : Online Sunshi... Page 1 of 4 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.31777 Public schools interlocal agreement. -- (1)(a) The county and municipalities located within the geographic area of a school district shall enter into an interlocal agreement with the district school board which jointly establishes the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the district school board and the local governments are to be coordinated. The interlocal agreements shall be submitted to the state land planning agency and the Office of Educational Facilities and the SMART Schools Clearinghouse in accordance with a schedule published by the state land planning agency. (b) The schedule must establish staggered due dates for submission of interlocal agreements that are executed by both the local government and the district school board, commencing on March 1, 2003, and concluding by December 1, 2004, and must set the same date for all governmental entities within a school district. However, if the county where the school district is located contains more than 20 municipalities, the state land planning agency may establish staggered due dates for the submission of interlocal agreements by these municipalities. The schedule must begin with those areas where both the number of districtwide capital- outlay full - time- equivalent students equals 80 percent or more of the current year's school capacity and the projected 5 -year student growth is 1,000 or greater, or where the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 10 percent or greater. (c) If the student population has declined over the 5 -year period preceding the due date for submittal of an interlocal agreement by the local government and the district school board, the local government and the district school board may petition the state land planning agency for a waiver of one or more requirements of subsection (2). The waiver must be granted if the procedures called for in subsection (2) are unnecessary because of the school district's declining school age population, considering the district's 5 -year facilities work program prepared pursuant to s. 1013,_35,_ The state land planning agency may modify or revoke the waiver upon a finding that the conditions upon which the waiver was granted no longer exist. The district school board and local governments must submit an interlocal agreement within 1 year after notification by the state land planning agency that the conditions for a waiver no longer exist. (d) Interlocal agreements between local governments and district school boards adopted pursuant to s. 163.3177 before the effective date of this section must be updated and executed pursuant to the requirements of this section, if necessary. Amendments to interlocal agreements adopted pursuant to this section must be submitted to the state land planning agency within 30 days after execution by the http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 6tatutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 31777 : Online Sunshi... Page 2 of 4 parties for review consistent with this section. Local governments and the district school board in each school district are encouraged to adopt a single interlocal agreement to which all join as parties. The state land planning agency shall assemble and make available model interlocal agreements meeting the requirements of this section and notify local governments and, jointly with the Department of Education, the district school boards of the requirements of this section, the dates for compliance, and the sanctions for noncompliance. The state land planning agency shall be available to informally review proposed interlocal agreements. If the state land planning agency has not received a proposed interlocal agreement for informal review, the state land planning agency shall, at least 60 days before the deadline for submission of the executed agreement, renotify the local government and the district school board of the upcoming deadline and the potential for sanctions. (2) At a minimum, the interlocal agreement must address interlocal-agreement requirements in s. 163.31W(13)(g), except for exempt local governments as provided in s. 163,317 7(12), and must address the following issues: (a) A process by which each local government and the district school board agree and base their plans on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The geographic distribution of jurisdiction -wide growth forecasts is a major objective of the process. (b) A process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned public school facilities, including school renovations and closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment. (c) Participation by affected local governments with the district school board in the process of evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and new school site selection before land acquisition. Local governments shall advise the district school board as to the consistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, including appropriate circumstances and criteria under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. (d) A process for determining the need for and timing of onsite and offsite improvements to support new, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools. The process must address identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements. (e) A process for the school board to inform the local government regarding the effect of comprehensive plan amendments on school capacity. The capacity reporting must be consistent with laws and rules relating to measurement of school facility capacity and must also identify how the district school board will meet the public school demand based on the facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013,_35,. (f) Participation of the local governments in the preparation of the annual update to the district school board's 5-year district facilities work program and educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. http: / /www.leg.state.fl. us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 31777 : Online Sunshi... Page 3 of 4 (g) A process for determining where and how joint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency. (h) A procedure for the resolution of disputes between the district school board and local governments, which may include the dispute resolution processes contained in chapters 164 and 186. (i) An oversight process, including an opportunity for public participation, for the implementation of the interlocal agreement. (3)(a) The Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse shall submit any comments or concerns regarding the executed interlocal agreement to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt of the executed interlocal agreement. The state land planning agency shall review the executed interlocal agreement to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of subsection (2), the adopted local government comprehensive plan, and other requirements of law. Within 60 days after receipt of an executed interlocal agreement, the state land planning agency shall publish a notice of intent in the Florida Administrative Weekly and shall post a copy of the notice on the agency's Internet site. The notice of intent must state whether the interlocal agreement is consistent or inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (2) and this subsection, as appropriate. (b) The state land planning agency's notice is subject to challenge under chapter 120; however, an affected person, as defined in s. 163.31- 4(1)(a), has standing to initiate the administrative proceeding, and this proceeding is the sole means available to challenge the consistency of an interlocal agreement required by this section with the criteria contained in subsection (2) and this subsection. In order to have standing, each person must have submitted oral or written comments, recommendations, or objections to the local government or the school board before the adoption of the interlocal agreement by the school board and local government. The district school board and local governments are parties to any such proceeding. In this proceeding, when the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be consistent with the criteria in subsection (2) and this subsection, the interlocal agreement shall be determined to be consistent with subsection (2) and this subsection if the local government's and school board's determination of consistency is fairly debatable. When the state planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (2) and this subsection, the local government's and school board's determination of consistency shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent. (c) If the state land planning agency enters a final order that finds that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (2) or this subsection, it shall forward it to the Administration Commission, which may impose sanctions against the local government pursuant to s. 163,_3184(11) and may impose sanctions against the district school board by directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board an equivalent amount of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 141.3.6.5, 1013.68, 1013.70, and 1013.72. (4) If an executed interlocal agreement is not timely submitted to the state land planning agency for review, the state land planning agency shall, within 15 working days after the deadline for submittal, http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 31777 : Online Sunshi... Page 4 of 4 issue to the local government and the district school board a Notice to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to submit an executed interlocat agreement by the deadline established by the agency. The agency shalt forward the notice and the responses to the Administration Commission, which may enter a final order citing the failure to comply and imposing sanctions against the local government and district school board by directing the appropriate agencies to withhold at least 5 percent of state funds pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and by directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board at least 5 percent of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.6 5, 1013.68, 1013.7 0, and 1013.72. (5) Any local government transmitting a public school element to implement school concurrency pursuant to the requirements of s. 1163 .318 before the effective date of this section is not required to amend the element or any interlocat agreement to conform with the provisions of this section if the element is adopted prior to or within 1 year after the effective date of this section and remains in effect until the county conducts its evaluation and appraisal report and identifies changes necessary to more fully conform to the provisions of this section. (6) Except as provided in subsection (7), municipalities meeting the exemption criteria in s. 163,_3.177 (12) are exempt from the requirements of subsections (1), (2), and (3). (7) At the time of the evaluation and appraisal report, each exempt municipality shall assess the extent to which it continues to meet the criteria for exemption under s. 163.3177(12). If the municipality continues to meet these criteria, the municipality shall continue to be exempt from the interlocal- agreement requirement. Each municipality exempt under s. 163,_3177(12) must comply with the provisions of this section within 1 year after the district school board proposes, in its 5 -year district facilities work program, a new school within the municipality's jurisdiction. History. - -s. 5, ch. 2002 -296; s. 15, ch. 2003 -1; s. 4, ch. 2005.290. Copyright ©1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Ply Statement • Contact Us http: / /www. leg. state .fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm ?App _ rnode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/512007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180: Online Sunshine Page 1 of 16 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title Xl Chapter 163 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.3180 Concurrency.-- (1)(a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, schools, and transportation facilities, including mass transit, where applicable, are the only public facilities and services subject to the concurrency requirement on a statewide basis. Additional public facilities and services may not be made subject to concurrency on a statewide basis without appropriate study and approval by the Legislature; however, any local government may extend the concurrency requirement so that it applies to additional public facilities within its jurisdiction. (b) Local governments shall use professionally accepted techniques for measuring level of service for automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and trucks. These techniques may be used to evaluate increased accessibility by multiple modes and reductions in vehicle miles of travel in an area or zone. The Department of Transportation shall develop methodologies to assist local governments in implementing this multimodal level -of- service analysis. The Department of Community Affairs and the Department of Transportation shall provide technical assistance to local governments in applying these methodologies. (2)(a) Consistent with public health and safety, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water supplies, and potable water facilities shall be in place and available to serve new development no later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the local government shall consult with the applicable water supplier to determine whether adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. A local government may meet the concurrency requirement for sanitary sewer through the use of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department of Health to serve new development. (b) Consistent with the public welfare, and except as otherwise provided in this section, parks and recreation facilities to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction no later than 1 year after issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. However, the acreage for such facilities shall be dedicated or be acquired by the local government prior to issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share shall be committed no later than the Local government's approval to commence construction. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163 -> Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 16 (c) Consistent with the public welfare, and except as otherwise provided in this section, transportation facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. (3) Governmental entities that are not responsible for providing, financing, operating, or regulating public facilities needed to serve development may not establish binding level -of- service standards on governmental entities that do bear those responsibilities. This subsection does not limit the authority of any agency to recommend or make objections, recommendations, comments, or determinations during reviews conducted under s. 163.3184. (4)(a) The concurrency requirement as implemented in local comprehensive plans applies to state and other public facilities and development to the same extent that it applies to all other facilities and development, as provided by law. (b) The concurrency requirement as implemented in local comprehensive plans does not apply to public transit facilities. For the purposes of this paragraph, public transit facilities include transit stations and terminals; transit station parking; park- and -ride lots; intermodal public transit connection or transfer facilities; fixed bus, guideway, and rail stations; and airport passenger terminals and concourses, air cargo facilities, and hangars for the maintenance or storage of aircraft. As used in this paragraph, the terms "terminals" and "transit facilities' do not include seaports or commercial or residential development constructed in conjunction with a public transit facility. (c) The concurrency requirement, except as it relates to transportation facilities and public schools, as implemented in local government comprehensive plans, may be waived by a local government for urban infill and redevelopment areas designated pursuant to s. 163.2517 if such a waiver does not endanger public health or safety as defined by the local government in its local government comprehensive plan. The waiver shall be adopted as a plan amendment pursuant to the process set forth in s. 163.3187(3)(a). A local government may grant a concurrency exception pursuant to subsection (5) for transportation facilities located within these urban infill and redevelopment areas. (5)(a) The Legislature finds that under limited circumstances dealing with transportation facilities, countervailing planning and public policy goals may come into conflict with the requirement that adequate public facilities and services be available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The Legislature further finds that often the unintended result of the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities is the discouragement of urban infill development and redevelopment. Such unintended results directly conflict with the goals and policies of the state comprehensive plan and the intent of this part. Therefore, exceptions from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities may be granted as provided by this subsection. (b) A local government may grant an exception from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities if the proposed development is otherwise consistent with the adopted local government comprehensive plan and is a project that promotes public transportation or is located within an area designated in the comprehensive plan for: http: / /www.leg. state. fl. us / statuteslindex.cfm ?App_mode= Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 16 1. Urban infill development; 2. Urban redevelopment; 3. Downtown revitalization; 4. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163- ,2517; or 5. An urban service area specifically designated as a transportation concurrency exception area which includes lands appropriate for compact, contiguous urban development, which does not exceed the amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population growth at densities consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan within the 10 -year planning period, and which is served or is planned to be served with public facilities and services as provided by the capital improvements element. (c) The Legislature also finds that developments located within urban infill, urban redevelopment, existing urban service, or downtown revitalization areas or areas designated as urban infill and redevelopment areas under s. 163.2511 which pose only special part-time demands on the transportation system should be excepted from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities. A special part -time demand is one that does not have more than 200 scheduled events during any calendar year and does not affect the 100 highest traffic volume hours. (d) A local government shall establish guidelines in the comprehensive plan for granting the exceptions authorized in paragraphs (b) and (c) and subsections (7) and (15) which must be consistent with and support a comprehensive strategy adopted in the plan to promote the purpose of the exceptions. (e) The local government shall adopt into the plan and implement long -term strategies to support and fund mobility within the designated exception area, including alternative modes of transportation. The plan amendment must also demonstrate how strategies will support the purpose of the exception and how mobility within the designated exception area will be provided. In addition, the strategies must address urban design; appropriate land use mixes, including intensity and density; and network connectivity plans needed to promote urban infill, redevelopment, or downtown revitalization. The comprehensive plan amendment designating the concurrency exception area must be accompanied by data and analysis justifying the size of the area. (f) Prior to the designation of a concurrency exception area, the state land planning agency and the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact that the proposed exception area is expected to have on the adopted level -of- service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 3.3244, and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 3322M. Further, the local government shall, in consultation with the state land planning agency and the Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the development of a long -term concurrency management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163,3177(3)(d). The exceptions may be available only within the specific geographic area of the jurisdiction designated in the plan. Pursuant to s. 163.3_1_84, any affected person may challenge a plan amendment establishing these guidelines and the hnp: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_StrinQ =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 4 of 16 areas within which an exception could be granted. (g) Transportation concurrency exception areas existing prior to July 1, 2005, must, at a minimum, meet the provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and appraisal report, whichever occurs last. (6) The Legislature finds that a de minimis impact is consistent with this part. A de minimis impact is an impact that would not affect more than 1 percent of the maximum volume at the adopted level of service of the affected transportation facility as determined by the local government. No impact will be de minimis if the sum of existing roadway volumes and the projected volumes from approved projects on a transportation facility would exceed 110 percent of the maximum volume at the adopted level of service of the affected transportation facility; provided however, that an impact of a single family home on an existing lot will constitute a de minimis impact on all roadways regardless of the level of the deficiency of the roadway. Further, no impact will be de minimis if it would exceed the adopted level - of- service standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes. Each local government shall maintain sufficient records to ensure that the 110 - percent criterion is not exceeded. Each local government shall submit annually, with its updated capital improvements element, a summary of the de minimis records. If the state land planning agency determines that the 110 - percent criterion has been exceeded, the state land planning agency shall notify the local government of the exceedance and that no further de minimis exceptions for the applicable roadway may be granted until such time as the volume is reduced below the 110 percent. The local government shall provide proof of this reduction to the state land planning agency before issuing further de minimis exceptions. (7) In order to promote infill development and redevelopment, one or more transportation concurrency management areas may be designated in a local government comprehensive plan. A transportation concurrency management area must be a compact geographic area with an existing network of roads where multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes are available for common trips. A local government may establish an areawide level -of- service standard for such a transportation concurrency management area based upon an analysis that provides for a justification for the areawide level of service, how urban infill development or redevelopment will be promoted, and how mobility will be accomplished within the transportation concurrency management area. Prior to the designation of a concurrency management area, the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact that the proposed concurrency management area is expected to have on the adopted level -of- service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 339,64, and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local government shall, in cooperation with the Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including, if appropriate, the development of a long -term concurrency management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). Transportation concurrency management areas existing prior to July 1, 2005, shall meet, at a minimum, the provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the time of the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and appraisal report, whichever occurs last. The state land planning agency shall amend chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, to be consistent with this subsection. (8) When assessing the transportation impacts of proposed urban redevelopment within an established http: / /www.leg. state. fl. us /statuteslindex.cfm ?App_mode= Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 16 existing urban service area, 110 percent of the actual transportation impact caused by the previously existing development must be reserved for the redevelopment, even if the previously existing development has a lesser or nonexisting impact pursuant to the calculations of the local government. Redevelopment requiring less than 110 percent of the previously existing capacity shall not be prohibited due to the reduction of transportation levels of service below the adopted standards. This does not preclude the appropriate assessment of fees or accounting for the impacts within the concurrency management system and capital improvements program of the affected local government. This paragraph does not affect local government requirements for appropriate development permits. (9)(a) Each local government may adopt as a part of its plan, long -term transportation and school concurrency management systems with a planning period of up to 10 years for specially designated districts or areas where significant backlogs exist. The plan may include interim level -of- service standards on certain facilities and shall rely on the local government's schedule of capital improvements for up to 10 years as a basis for issuing development orders that authorize commencement of construction in these designated districts or areas. The concurrency management system must be designed to correct existing deficiencies and set priorities for addressing backlogged facilities. The concurrency management system must be financially feasible and consistent with other portions of the adopted local plan, including the future land use map. (b) If a local government has a transportation or school facility backlog for existing development which cannot be adequately addressed in a 10 -year plan, the state land planning agency may allow it to develop a plan and long -term schedule of capital improvements covering up to 15 years for good and sufficient cause, based on a general comparison between that local government and all other similarly situated local jurisdictions, using the following factors: 1. The extent of the backlog. 2. For roads, whether the backlog is on local or state roads. 3. The cost of eliminating the backlog. 4. The local government's tax and other revenue - raising efforts. (c) The local government may issue approvals to commence construction notwithstanding this section, consistent with and in areas that are subject to a long -term concurrency management system. (d) If the local government adopts a long -term concurrency management system, it must evaluate the system periodically. At a minimum, the local government must assess its progress toward improving Levels of service within the long -term concurrency management district or area in the evaluation and appraisal report and determine any changes that are necessary to accelerate progress in meeting acceptable levels of service. (10) With regard to roadway facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System designated in accordance with ss. 339.61, 339,62, 339.63, and 339,644, the Florida Intrastate Highway System as defined in s. 338,091, http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 statutes & constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 :Online Sunshine Page 6 of 16 and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819, local governments shall adopt the level - of- service standard established by the Department of Transportation by rule. For all other roads on the State Highway System, local governments shall establish an adequate level -of- service standard that need not be consistent with any level -of- service standard established by the Department of Transportation. In establishing adequate level -of- service standards for any arterial roads, or collector roads as appropriate, which traverse multiple jurisdictions, local governments shall consider compatibility with the roadway facility's adopted level -of- service standards in adjacent jurisdictions. Each local government within a county shall use a professionally accepted methodology for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purposes of imptementing its concurrency management system. Counties are encouraged to coordinate with adjacent counties, and local governments within a county are encouraged to coordinate, for the purpose of using common methodologies for measuring impacts on transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing their concurrency management systems. (11) In order to limit the liability of local governments, a local government may allow a landowner to proceed with development of a specific parcel of land notwithstanding a failure of the development to satisfy transportation concurrency, when all the following factors are shown to exist: (a) The local government with jurisdiction over the property has adopted a local comprehensive plan that is in compliance. (b) The proposed development would be consistent with the future land use designation for the specific property and with pertinent portions of the adopted local plan, as determined by the local government. (c) The local plan includes a financially feasible capital improvements element that provides for transportation facilities adequate to serve the proposed development, and the local government has not implemented that element. (d) The local government has provided a means by which the landowner will be assessed a fair share of the cost of providing the transportation facilities necessary to serve the proposed development. (e) The landowner has made a binding commitment to the local government to pay the fair share of the cost of providing the transportation facilities to serve the proposed development. (12) A development of regional impact may satisfy the transportation concurrency requirements of the local comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate -share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic impacts, if: (a) The development of regional impact which, based on its location or mix of land uses, is designed to encourage pedestrian or other nonautomotive modes of transportation; (b) The proportionate -share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to pay for one or more required mobility improvements that will benefit a regionally significant transportation facility; http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 7 of 16 (c) The owner and developer of the development of regional impact pays or assures payment of the proportionate -share contribution; and (d) If the regionally significant transportation facility to be constructed or improved is under the maintenance authority of a governmental entity, as defined by s. 334,03(12), other than the local government with jurisdiction over the development of regional impact, the developer is required to enter into a binding and legally enforceable commitment to transfer funds to the governmental entity having maintenance authority or to otherwise assure construction or improvement of the facility. The proportionate -share contribution may be applied to any transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate -share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of the improvement. Proportionate -share mitigation shall be limited to ensure that a development of regional impact meeting the requirements of this subsection mitigates its impact on the transportation system but is not responsible for the additional cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. This subsection also applies to Florida Quality Developments pursuant to s. 380..441 and to detailed specific area plans implementing optional sector plans pursuant to s. 143,3245, (13) School concurrency shall be established on a districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the district and all portions of the district, whether located in a municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12). The application of school concurrency to development shall be based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph (f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163,3184(7) and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the following: (a) Public school facilities element. - -A local government shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency a plan or plan amendment which includes a public school facilities element which is consistent with the requirements of s. 163.3177(12) and which is determined to be in compliance as defined in s. 163,3184(1)(b). All local government public school facilities plan elements within a county must be consistent with each other as well as the requirements of this part. (b) Level -of- service standards. - -The Legislature recognizes that an essential requirement for a concurrency management system is the level of service at which a public facility is expected to operate. 1. Local governments and school boards imposing school concurrency shall exercise authority in conjunction with each other to establish jointly adequate level -of- service standards, as defined in http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 8 of 16 chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, necessary to implement the adopted local government comprehensive plan, based on data and analysis. 2. Public school level -of- service standards shall be included and adopted into the capital improvements element of the local comprehensive plan and shall apply districtwide to all schools of the same type. Types of schools may include elementary, middle, and high schools as well as special purpose facilities such as magnet schools. 3. Local governments and school boards shall have the option to utilize tiered level -of- service standards to allow time to achieve an adequate and desirable level of service as circumstances warrant. (c) Service areas. - -The Legislature recognizes that an essential requirement for a concurrency system is a designation of the area within which the level of service will be measured when an application for a residential development permit is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. This delineation is also important for purposes of determining whether the local government has a financially feasible public school capital facilities program that will provide schools which will achieve and maintain the adopted level -of- service standards. 1. In order to balance competing interests, preserve the constitutional concept of uniformity, and avoid disruption of existing educational and growth management processes, local governments are encouraged to initially apply school concurrency to development only on a districtwide basis so that a concurrency determination for a specific development will be based upon the availability of school capacity districtwide. To ensure that development is coordinated with schools having available capacity, within 5 years after adoption of school concurrency, local governments shall apply school concurrency on a less than districtwide basis, such as using school attendance zones or concurrency service areas, as provided in subparagraph 2. 2. For local governments applying school concurrency on a less than districtwide basis, such as utilizing school attendance zones or larger school concurrency service areas, local governments and school boards shall have the burden to demonstrate that the utilization of school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent possible in the comprehensive plan and amendment, taking into account transportation costs and court - approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. In addition, in order to achieve concurrency within the service area boundaries selected by local governments and school boards, the service area boundaries, together with the standards for establishing those boundaries, shall be identified and included as supporting data and analysis for the comprehensive plan. 3. Where school capacity is available on a districtwide basis but school concurrency is applied on a less than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, if the adopted level -of- service standard cannot be met in a particular service area as applied to an application for a development permit and if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas, as adopted by the local government, then the local government may not deny an application for site plan or final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent for a development or phase of a development on the basis of school concurrency, and if issued, development impacts shall be shifted to contiguous service areas with schools having available capacity. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Sunshine Page 9 of 16 (d) Financial feasibility. - -The Legislature recognizes that financial feasibility is an important issue because the premise of concurrency is that the public facilities will be provided in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level -of- service standard. This part and chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, contain specific standards to determine the financial feasibility of capital programs. These standards were adopted to make concurrency more predictable and local governments more accountable. 1. A comprehensive plan amendment seeking to impose school concurrency shall contain appropriate amendments to the capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan, consistent with the requirements of s. 163.3117(3) and rule 9J- 5.016, Florida Administrative Code. The capital improvements element shall set forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities program, established in conjunction with the school board, that demonstrates that the adopted level -of- service standards will be achieved and maintained. 2. Such amendments shall demonstrate that the public school capital facilities program meets all of the financial feasibility standards of this part and chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, that apply to capital programs which provide the basis for mandatory concurrency on other public facilities and services. 3. When the financial feasibility of a public school capital facilities program is evaluated by the state land planning agency for purposes of a compliance determination, the evaluation shall be based upon the service areas selected by the local governments and school board. (e) Availability standard. -- Consistent with the public welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent for a development or phase of a development authorizing residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the level -of- service standard for public school capacity in a local school concurrency management system where adequate school facilities will be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency is satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities to be created by actual development of the property, including, but not limited to, the options described in subparagraph 1. Options for proportionate -share mitigation of impacts on public school facilities must be established in the public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 163.31777. 1. Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a public school facility; or the creation of mitigation banking based on the construction of a public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options must include execution by the applicant and the local government of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding commitment to pay proportionate -share mitigation for the additional residential units approved by the local government in a development order and actually developed on the property, taking into account residential density allowed on the property prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall residential density. The district school board must be a party to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a development agreement, the local government may require the landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm ?App mode= Display _Statute &S earch_String =... 9/5/2007 OLaiures M wrrsutuuull : view Matures :- >wui- >t_nuib _j- >sectron 312A1 : Unlrne suns... Yage 10 of 16 its expiration. 2. If the education facilities plan and the public educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a portion thereof, as proportionate -share mitigation, the local government shall credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the same need, on a dollar - for - dollar basis at fair market value. 3. Any proportionate -share mitigation must be directed by the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified in a financially feasible 5 -year district work plan that satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance with a binding developer's agreement. 4. If a development is precluded from commencing because there is inadequate classroom capacity to mitigate the impacts of the development, the development may nevertheless commence if there are accelerated facilities in an approved capital improvement element scheduled for construction in year four or later of such plan which, when built, will mitigate the proposed development, or if such accelerated facilities will be in the next annual update of the capital facilities element, the developer enters into a binding, financially guaranteed agreement with the school district to construct an accelerated facility within the first 3 years of an approved capital improvement plan, and the cost of the school facility is equal to or greater than the development's proportionate share. When the completed school facility is conveyed to the school district, the developer shall receive impact fee credits usable within the zone where the facility is constructed or any attendance zone contiguous with or adjacent to the zone where the facility is constructed. 5. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local government to deny a development permit or its functional equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except as provided in this part. (f) Intergovernmental coordination. -- 1. When establishing concurrency requirements for public schools, a local government shall satisfy the requirements for intergovernmental coordination set forth in s. 163.3177(6)(h)l . and 2., except that a municipality is not required to be a signatory to the interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h) 2. and 163.31777(6), as a prerequisite for imposition of school concurrency, and as a nonsignatory, shall not participate in the adopted local school concurrency system, if the municipality meets all of the following criteria for having no significant impact on school attendance: a. The municipality has issued development orders for fewer than 50 residential dwelling units during the preceding 5 years, or the municipality has generated fewer than 25 additional public school students during the preceding 5 years. b. The municipality has not annexed new land during the preceding 5 years in land use categories which permit residential uses that will affect school attendance rates. c. The municipality has no public schools located within its boundaries. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lay_Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180: Online Suns... Page 11 of 16 d. At least 80 percent of the developable land within the boundaries of the municipality has been built upon. 2. A municipality which qualifies as having no significant impact on school attendance pursuant to the criteria of subparagraph 1. must review and determine at the time of its evaluation and appraisal report pursuant to s. 143,_3191 whether it continues to meet the criteria pursuant to s. 163.31777(6). If the municipality determines that it no longer meets the criteria, it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals, objectives, and policies in its plan amendments based on the evaluation and appraisal report, and enter into the existing interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h)2. and 163.31777, in order to fully participate in the school concurrency system. If such a municipality fails to do so, it will be subject to the enforcement provisions of s. 163.3191. (g) Interlocal agreement for school concurrency.- -When establishing concurrency requirements for public schools, a local government must enter into an interlocal agreement that satisfies the requirements in ss. 163.3177(6)(h)l. and 2. and 163.31777 and the requirements of this subsection. The interlocal agreement shall acknowledge both the school board's constitutional and statutory obligations to provide a uniform system of free public schools on a countywide basis, and the land use authority of local governments, including their authority to approve or deny comprehensive plan amendments and development orders. The interlocal agreement shall be submitted to the state land planning agency by the local government as a part of the compliance review, along with the other necessary amendments to the comprehensive plan required by this part. In addition to the requirements of ss. 163.3177(6)(h) and - 163.31777, the interlocal agreement shall meet the following requirements: 1. Establish the mechanisms for coordinating the development, adoption, and amendment of each local government's public school facilities element with each other and the plans of the school board to ensure a uniform districtwide school concurrency system. 2. Establish a process for the development of siting criteria which encourages the location of public schools proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible and seeks to collocate schools with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers to the extent possible. 3. Specify uniform, districtwide level -of- service standards for public schools of the same type and the process for modifying the adopted level -of- service standards. 4. Establish a process for the preparation, amendment, and joint approval by each local government and the school board of a public school capital facilities program which is financially feasible, and a process and schedule for incorporation of the public school capital facilities program into the local government comprehensive plans on an annual basis. 5. Define the geographic application of school concurrency. If school concurrency is to be applied on a less than districtwide basis in the form of concurrency service areas, the agreement shall establish criteria and standards for the establishment and modification of school concurrency service areas. The agreement shall also establish a process and schedule for the mandatory incorporation of the school concurrency service areas and the criteria and standards for establishment of the service areas into the http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Suns... Page 12 of 16 local government comprehensive plans. The agreement shall ensure maximum utilization of school capacity, taking into account transportation costs and court - approved desegregation plans, as well as other factors. The agreement shall also ensure the achievement and maintenance of the adopted level - of- service standards for the geographic area of application throughout the 5 years covered by the public school capital facilities plan and thereafter by adding a new fifth year during the annual update. 6. Establish a uniform districtwide procedure for implementing school concurrency which provides for: a. The evaluation of development applications for compliance with school concurrency requirements, including information provided by the school board on affected schools, impact on levels of service, and programmed improvements for affected schools and any options to provide sufficient capacity; b. An opportunity for the school board to review and comment on the effect of comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings on the public school facilities plan; and c. The monitoring and evaluation of the school concurrency system. 7. Include provisions relating to amendment of the agreement. 8. A process and uniform methodology for determining proportionate -share mitigation pursuant to subparagraph (e)1. (h) Local government authority. - -This subsection does not limit the authority of a local government to grant or deny a development permit or its functional equivalent prior to the implementation of school concurrency. (14) The state land planning agency shall, by October 1, 1998, adopt by rule minimum criteria for the review and determination of compliance of a public school facilities element adopted by a local government for purposes of imposition of school concurrency. (15)(a) Multimodal transportation districts may be established under a local government comprehensive plan in areas delineated on the future land use map for which the local comprehensive plan assigns secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to assuring a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with convenient interconnection to transit. Such districts must incorporate community design features that will reduce the number of automobile trips or vehicle miles of travel and will support an integrated, multimodal transportation system. Prior to the designation of multimodal transportation districts, the Department of Transportation shall be consulted by the local government to assess the impact that the proposed multimodal district area is expected to have on the adopted level -of- service standards established for Strategic Intermodal System facilities, as defined in s. 339.64, and roadway facilities funded in accordance with s. 339.2819. Further, the local government shall, in cooperation with the Department of Transportation, develop a plan to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Intermodal System, including the development of a long -term concurrency management system pursuant to subsection (9) and s. 163.3177(3)(d). Multimodal transportation districts existing prior to July 1, 2005, shall meet, at a minimum, the provisions of this section by July 1, 2006, or at the http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :->2007->Ch01 63 ->Section 3180 : Online Suns... Page 13 of 16 time of the comprehensive plan update pursuant to the evaluation and appraisal report, whichever occurs last. (b) Community design elements of such a district include: a complementary mix and range of land uses, including educational, recreational, and cultural uses; interconnected networks of streets designed to encourage walking and bicycling, with traffic - calming where desirable; appropriate densities and intensities of use within walking distance of transit stops; daily activities within walking distance of residences, allowing independence to persons who do not drive; public uses, streets, and squares that are safe, comfortable, and attractive for the pedestrian, with adjoining buildings open to the street and with parking not interfering with pedestrian, transit, automobile, and truck travel modes. (c) Local governments may establish multimodal level -of- service standards that rely primarily on nonvehicular modes of transportation within the district, when justified by an analysis demonstrating that the existing and planned community design will provide an adequate level of mobility within the district based upon professionally accepted multimodal level -of- service methodologies. The analysis must also demonstrate that the capital improvements required to promote community design are financially feasible over the development or redevelopment timeframe for the district and that community design features within the district provide convenient interconnection for a multimodal transportation system. Local governments may issue development permits in reliance upon all planned community design capital improvements that are financially feasible over the development or redevelopment timeframe for the district, without regard to the period of time between development or redevelopment and the scheduled construction of the capital improvements. A determination of financial feasibility shall be based upon currently available funding or funding sources that could reasonably be expected to become available over the planning period. (d) Local governments may reduce impact fees or local access fees for development within multimodal transportation districts based on the reduction of vehicle trips per household or vehicle miles of travel expected from the development pattern planned for the district. (e) By December 1, 2007, the Department of Transportation, in consultation with the state land planning agency and interested local governments, may designate a study area for conducting a pilot project to determine the benefits of and barriers to establishing a regional multimodal transportation concurrency district that extends over more than one local government jurisdiction. If designated: 1. The study area must be in a county that has a population of at least 1,000 persons per square mile, be within an urban service area, and have the consent of the local governments within the study area. The Department of Transportation and the state land planning agency shall provide technical assistance. 2. The local governments within the study area and the Department of Transportation, in consultation with the state land planning agency, shall cooperatively create a multimodal transportation plan that meets the requirements of this section. The multimodal transportation plan must include viable local funding options and incorporate community design features, including a range of mixed land uses and densities and intensities, which will reduce the number of automobile trips or vehicle miles of travel while supporting an integrated, multimodal transportation system. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180: Online Suns... Page 14 of 16 3. To effectuate the multimodal transportation concurrency district, participating local governments may adopt appropriate comprehensive plan amendments. 4. The Department of Transportation, in consultation with the state land planning agency, shall submit a report by March 1, 2009, to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on the status of the pilot project. The report must identify any factors that support or limit the creation and success of a regional multimodal transportation district including intergovernmental coordination. (16) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a method by which the impacts of development on transportation facilities can be mitigated by the cooperative efforts of the public and private sectors. The methodology used to calculate proportionate fair -share mitigation under this section shall be as provided for in subsection (12). (a) By December 1, 2006, each local government shall adopt by ordinance a methodology for assessing proportionate fair -share mitigation options. By December 1, 2005, the Department of Transportation shall develop a model transportation concurrency management ordinance with methodologies for assessing proportionate fair -share mitigation options. (b)1. In its transportation concurrency management system, a local government shall, by December 1, 2006, include methodologies that will be applied to calculate proportionate fair -share mitigation. A developer may choose to satisfy all transportation concurrency requirements by contributing or paying proportionate fair -share mitigation if transportation facilities or facility segments identified as mitigation for traffic impacts are specifically identified for funding in the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements in the capital improvements element of the local plan or the long -term concurrency management system or if such contributions or payments to such facilities or segments are reflected in the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements in the next regularly scheduled update of the capital improvements element. Updates to the 5 -year capital improvements element which reflect proportionate fair -share contributions may not be found not in compliance based on ss. 163,3164(32) and 163.3177(3) if additional contributions, payments or funding sources are reasonably anticipated during a period not to exceed 10 years to fully mitigate impacts on the transportation facilities. 2. Proportionate fair -share mitigation shall be applied as a credit against impact fees to the extent that all or a portion of the proportionate fair -share mitigation is used to address the same capital infrastructure improvements contemplated by the local government's impact fee ordinance. (c) Proportionate fair -share mitigation includes, without limitation, separately or collectively, private funds, contributions of land, and construction and contribution of facilities and may include public funds as determined by the local government. Proportionate fair -share mitigation may be directed toward one or more specific transportation improvements reasonably related to the mobility demands created by the development and such improvements may address one or more modes of travel. The fair market value of the proportionate fair -share mitigation shall not differ based on the form of mitigation. A local government may not require a development to pay more than its proportionate fair -share contribution regardless of the method of mitigation. Proportionate fair -share mitigation shall be limited to ensure http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &SearCh_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180 : Online Suns... Page 15 of 16 that a development meeting the requirements of this section mitigates its impact on the transportation - system but is not responsible for the additional cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. (d) This subsection does not require a local government to approve a development that is not otherwise qualified for approval pursuant to the applicable local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. (e) Mitigation for development impacts to facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to this subsection requires the concurrence of the Department of Transportation. (f) If the funds in an adopted 5 -year capital improvements element are insufficient to fully fund construction of a transportation improvement required by the local government's concurrency management system, a local government and a developer may still enter into a binding proportionate - share agreement authorizing the developer to construct that amount of development on which the proportionate share is calculated if the proportionate -share amount in such agreement is sufficient to pay for one or more improvements which will, in the opinion of the governmental entity or entities maintaining the transportation facilities, significantly benefit the impacted transportation system. The improvements funded by the proportionate -share component must be adopted into the 5 -year capital improvements schedule of the comprehensive plan at the next annual capital improvements element update. The funding of any improvements that significantly benefit the impacted transportation system satisfies concurrency requirements as a mitigation of the development's impact upon the overall transportation system even if there remains a failure of concurrency on other impacted facilities. (g) Except as provided in subparagraph (b)1., this section may not prohibit the Department of Community Affairs from finding other portions of the capital improvements element amendments not in compliance as provided in this chapter. (h) The provisions of this subsection do not apply to a development of regional impact satisfying the requirements of subsection (12). (17) A local government and the developer of affordable workforce housing units developed in accordance with s. 384.06(19) or s. 380.0651(3) may identify an employment center or centers in close proximity to the affordable workforce housing units. If at least 50 percent of the units are occupied by an employee or employees of an identified employment center or centers, all of the affordable workforce housing units are exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, and the local government may not reduce any transportation trip - generation entitlements of an approved development -of- regional- impact development order. As used in this subsection, the term "close proximity" means 5 miles from the nearest point of the development of regional impact to the nearest point of the employment center, and the term "employment center" means a place of employment that employs at least 25 or more full -time employees. History. - -s. 8, ch. 93.206; s. 12, ch. 95.341; s. 3, ch. 96.416; s. 1, ch. 97 -253; s. 5, ch. 98 -176; s. 4, ch. 99 -378; s. 2, ch. 2002 -13; s. 6, ch. 2002 -296; s. 5, ch. 2005 -290; s. 11, ch. 2005 -291; s. 18, ch. 2006 -1; s. 3, ch. 2006 -220; s. 3, ch. 2006.252; s. 11, ch. 2007 -196; s. 2, ch. 2007.198; s. 3, ch. 2007 -204. http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch0163- >Section 3180: Online Suns... Page 16 of 16 Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement . Contact Us http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 01 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 3 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.01 Definitions.- -The following terms shall be defined as follows for the purpose of this chapter: (1) "Ancillary plant" is comprised of the building, site, and site improvements necessary to provide such facilities as vehicle maintenance, warehouses, maintenance, or administrative buildings necessary to provide support services to an educational program. (2) "Auxiliary facility" means the spaces located at educational plants which are not designed for student occupant stations. (3) "Board," unless otherwise specified, means a district school board, a community college board of trustees, a university board of trustees, and the Board of Trustees for the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind. The term "board" does not include the State Board of Education or the Board of m Governors. (4) "Capital project," for the purpose of s. 9(a)(2), Art. XII of the State Constitution, as amended, means sums of money appropriated from the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust Fund to the state system of public education and other educational agencies as authorized by the Legislature. (5) "Core facilities" means the media center, cafeteria, toilet facilities, and circulation space of an educational plant. (6) "Educational facilities" means the buildings and equipment, structures, and special educational use areas that are built, installed, or established to serve primarily the educational purposes and secondarily the social and recreational purposes of the community and which may lawfully be used as authorized by the Florida Statutes and approved by boards. (7) "Educational plant" comprises the educational facilities, site, and site improvements necessary to accommodate students, faculty, administrators, staff, and the activities of the educational program of each plant. (8) "Educational plant survey" means a systematic study of present educational and ancillary plants and the determination of future needs to provide an appropriate educational program and services for each student based on projected capital outlay FTE's approved by the Department of Education. (9) "Feasibility study' means the examination and analysis of information related to projected http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 statutes & uonsutution :View Statutes :- >20U " /- >Ch1013- >Section 01 :Online Sunshine Page 2 of 3 educational facilities to determine whether they are reasonable and possible. (10) "Long -range planning' means devising a systematic method based on educational information and needs, carefully analyzed, to provide the facilities to meet the goals and objectives of the educational agency for a period of 5 years. (11) "Low- energy usage features" means engineering features or devices that supplant or minimize the consumption of fossil fuels by heating equipment and cooling equipment. Such features may include, but are not limited to, high efficiency chillers and boilers, thermal storage tanks, solar energy systems, waste heat recovery systems, and facility load management systems. (12) "Maintenance and repair" means the upkeep of educational and ancillary plants, including, but not limited to, roof or roofing replacement short of complete replacement of membrane or structure; repainting of interior or exterior surfaces; resurfacing of floors; repair or replacement of glass; repair of hardware, furniture, equipment, electrical fixtures, and plumbing fixtures; and repair or resurfacing of parking lots, roads, and walkways. The term "maintenance and repair' does not include custodial or groundskeeping functions, or renovation except for the replacement of equipment with new equipment of equal systems meeting current code requirements, provided that the replacement item neither places increased demand upon utilities services or structural supports nor adversely affects the function of safety to life systems. (13) "Need determination' means the identification of types and amounts of educational facilities necessary to accommodate the educational programs, student population, faculty, administrators, staff, and auxiliary and ancillary services of an educational agency. (14) "New construction" means any construction of a building or unit of a building in which the entire work is new or an entirely new addition connected to an existing building or which adds additional square footage to the space inventory. (15) 'Passive design elements" means architectural features that minimize heat gain, heat loss, and the use of heating and cooling equipment when ambient conditions are extreme and that permit use of the facility without heating or air - conditioning when ambient conditions are moderate. Such features may include, but are not limited to, building orientation, landscaping, earth bermings, insulation, thermal windows and doors, overhangs, skylights, thermal chimneys, and other design arrangements. (16) 'Public education capital outlay (PECO) funded projects" means site acquisition, renovation, remodeling, construction projects, and site improvements necessary to accommodate buildings, equipment, other structures, and special educational use areas that are built, installed, or established to serve primarily the educational instructional program of the district school board, community college board of trustees, or university board of trustees. (17) 'Remodeling' means the changing of existing facilities by rearrangement of spaces and their use and includes, but is not limited to, the conversion of two classrooms to a science laboratory or the conversion of a closed plan arrangement to an open plan configuration. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us /statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search string =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 0I : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 3 (18) 'Renovation' means the rejuvenating or upgrading of existing facilities by installation or - replacement of materials and equipment and includes, but is not limited to, interior or exterior reconditioning of facilities and spaces; air - conditioning, heating, or ventilating equipment; fire alarm systems; emergency lighting; electrical systems; and complete roofing or roof replacement, including replacement of membrane or structure. As used in this subsection, the term "materials' does not include instructional materials. (19) "Satisfactory educational facility" means a facility that has been recommended for continued use by an educational plant survey or that has been classified as satisfactory in the state inventory of educational facilities. (20) "Site" means a space of ground occupied or to be occupied by an educational facility or program. (21) 'Site development' means work that must be performed on an unimproved site in order to make it usable for the desired purpose or work incidental to new construction or to make an addition usable. (22) 'Site improvement' means work that must be performed on an existing site to improve its utilization, correct health and safety deficiencies, meet special program needs, or provide additional service areas. (23) 'Site improvement incident to construction' means the work that must be performed on a site as an accompaniment to the construction of an educational facility. (24) 'Satellite facility" means the buildings and equipment, structures, and special educational use areas that are built, installed, or established by private business or industry in accordance with chapter 6A -2, Florida Administrative Code, to be used exclusively for educational purposes to serve primarily the students of its employees and that are staffed professionally by the district school board. History. - -s. 797, ch. 2002 -387; s. 166, ch. 2007 -217. Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 6 Select Year: 2007 1601 The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.33 Coordination of planning with local governing bodies. -- (1) It is the policy of this state to require the coordination of planning between boards and local governing bodies to ensure that plans for the construction and opening of public educational facilities are facilitated and coordinated in time and place with plans for residential development, concurrently with other necessary services. Such planning shall include the integration of the educational facilities plan and applicable policies and procedures of a board with the local comprehensive plan and land development regulations of local governments. The planning must include the consideration of allowing students to attend the school located nearest their homes when a new housing development is constructed near a county boundary and it is more feasible to transport the students a short distance to an existing facility in an adjacent county than to construct a new facility or transport students longer distances in their county of residence. The planning must also consider the effects of the location of public education facilities, including the feasibility of keeping central city facilities viable, in order to encourage central city redevelopment and the efficient use of infrastructure and to discourage uncontrolled urban sprawl. In addition, all parties to the planning process must consult with state and Local. road departments to assist in implementing the Safe Paths to Schools program administered by the Department of Transportation. (2)(a) The school board, county, and nonexempt municipalities located within the geographic area of a school district shall enter into an interlocal agreement that jointly establishes the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the district school board and the local governments are to be coordinated. The interlocal agreements shall be submitted to the state land planning agency and the Office of Educational Facilities and the SMART Schools Clearinghouse in accordance with a schedule published by the state land planning agency. (b) The schedule must establish staggered due dates for submission of interlocal agreements that are executed by both the local government and district school board, commencing on March 1, 2003, and concluding by December 1, 2004, and must set the same date for all governmental entities within a school district. However, if the county where the school district is located contains more than 20 municipalities, the state land planning agency may establish staggered due dates for the submission of interlocal agreements by these municipalities. The schedule must begin with those areas where both the number of districtwide capital- outlay full - time- equivalent students equals 80 percent or more of the current years school capacity and the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 1,000 or greater, or where the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 10 percent or greater. http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 OWwiw a. i.unsuiuuvu . v,cw oraiures :- xvvi- >t.nivi_)- >aecnon �).j : unnne 3unsnine Yage Z oI b (c) If the student population has declined over the 5 -year period preceding the due date for submittal of an interlocal agreement by the local government and the district school board, the local government and district school board may petition the state land planning agency for a waiver of one or more of the requirements of subsection (3). The waiver must be granted if the procedures called for in subsection (3) are unnecessary because of the school district's declining school age population, considering the district's 5 -year work program prepared pursuant to s. 1013 35. The state land planning agency may modify or revoke the waiver upon a finding that the conditions upon which the waiver was granted no longer exist. The district school board and local governments must submit an interlocal agreement within 1 year after notification by the state land planning agency that the conditions for a waiver no longer exist. (d) Interlocal agreements between local governments and district school boards adopted pursuant to s. 163,_3177 before the effective date of subsections (2) -(9) must be updated and executed pursuant to the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), if necessary. Amendments to interlocal agreements adopted pursuant to subsections (2) -(9) must be submitted to the state land planning agency within 30 days after execution by the parties for review consistent with subsections (3) and (4). Local governments and the district school board in each school district are encouraged to adopt a single interlocal agreement in which all join as parties. The state land planning agency shall assemble and make available model interlocal agreements meeting the requirements of subsections (2) -(9) and shall notify local governments and, jointly with the Department of Education, the district school boards of the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), the dates for compliance, and the sanctions for noncompliance. The state land planning agency shall be available to informally review proposed interlocal agreements. If the state land planning agency has not received a proposed interlocal agreement for informal review, the state land planning agency shall, at least 60 days before the deadline for submission of the executed agreement, renotify the local government and the district school board of the upcoming deadline and the potential for sanctions. (3) At a minimum, the interlocal agreement must address interlocal agreement requirements in s. 163.3180(13)(g), except for exempt local governments as provided in s. 163,317 (12), and must address the following issues: (a) A process by which each local government and the district school board agree and base their plans on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The geographic distribution of jurisdiction -wide growth forecasts is a major objective of the process. (b) A process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned public school facilities, including school renovations and closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment. (c) Participation by affected local governments with the district school board in the process of evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and new school site selection before land acquisition. Local governments shall advise the district school board as to the consistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 6 including appropriate circumstances and criteria under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. (d) A process for determining the need for and timing of onsite and offsite improvements to support new construction, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools. The process shall address identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements. (e) A process for the school board to inform the local government regarding the effect of comprehensive plan amendments on school capacity. The capacity reporting must be consistent with laws and rules regarding measurement of school facility capacity and must also identify how the district school board will meet the public school demand based on the facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. (f) Participation of the local governments in the preparation of the annual update to the school board's 5 -year district facilities work program and educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013,_36 (g) A process for determining where and how joint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency. (h) A procedure for the resolution of disputes between the district school board and local governments, which may include the dispute resolution processes contained in chapters 164 and 186. (i) An oversight process, including an opportunity for public participation, for the implementation of the interlocal agreement. (4)(a) The Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse shall submit any comments or concerns regarding the executed interlocal agreement to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt of the executed interlocal agreement. The state land planning agency shall review the executed interlocal agreement to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of subsection (3), the adopted local government comprehensive plan, and other requirements of law. Within 60 days after receipt of an executed interlocal agreement, the state land planning agency shall publish a notice of intent in the Florida Administrative Weekly and shall post a copy of the notice on the agency's Internet site. The notice of intent must state that the interlocal agreement is consistent or inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection as appropriate. (b) The state land planning agency's notice is subject to challenge under chapter 120; however, an affected person, as defined in s. 163 3184(1)(a), has standing to initiate the administrative proceeding, and this proceeding is the sole means available to challenge the consistency of an interlocal agreement required by this section with the criteria contained in subsection (3) and this subsection. In order to have standing, each person must have submitted oral or written comments, recommendations, or objections to the local government or the school board before the adoption of the interlocal agreement by the district school board and local government. The district school board and local governments are parties to any such proceeding. In this proceeding, when the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be consistent with the criteria in subsection (3) and this subsection, the http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 3ramtes ar t onstntutnon :view Statutes :- >ZUU /- >Uh1U13- >Sectnon 33 : Onlme Sunshine Page 4 of 6 interlocal agreement must be determined to be consistent with subsection (3) and this subsection if the local government's and school board's determination of consistency is fairly debatable. When the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection, the local government's and school board's determination of consistency shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent. (c) If the state land planning agency enters a final order that finds that the interlocat agreement is inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) or this subsection, the state land planning agency shall forward it to the Administration Commission, which may impose sanctions against the local government pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and may impose sanctions against the district school board by directing the Department of Education to withhold an equivalent amount of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, 101_3.7Q, and 1 1 7 . (5) If an executed interlocal agreement is not timely submitted to the state land planning agency for review, the state land planning agency shall, within 15 working days after the deadline for submittal, issue to the local government and the district school board a notice to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to submit an executed interlocal agreement by the deadline established by the agency. The agency shall forward the notice and the responses to the Administration Commission, which may enter a final order citing the failure to comply and imposing sanctions against the local government and district school board by directing the appropriate agencies to withhold at least 5 percent of state funds pursuant to s. 163.3184(l 11 and by directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board at least 5 percent of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1913,65, 1.913,68, 1013_.7Q, and 1013.72, (6) Any local government transmitting a public school element to implement school concurrency pursuant to the requirements of s. 163,_3180 before the effective date of this section is not required to amend the element or any interlocal agreement to conform with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) if the element is adopted prior to or within 1 year after the effective date of subsections (2) -(8) and remains in effect. (7) Except as provided in subsection (8), municipalities meeting the exemption criteria in s. 1-63,3177 (12) are exempt from the requirements of subsections (2), (3), and (4). (8) At the time of the evaluation and appraisal report, each exempt municipality shall assess the extent to which it continues to meet the criteria for exemption under s. 163,3177(12). If the municipality continues to meet these criteria, the municipality shall continue to be exempt from the interlocal agreement requirement. Each municipality exempt under s. 163,3177(12) must comply with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) within 1 year after the district school board proposes, in its 5 -year district facilities work program, a new school within the municipality's jurisdiction. (9) A board and the local governing body must share and coordinate information related to existing and planned school facilities; proposals for development, redevelopment, or additional development; and infrastructure required to support the school facilities, concurrent with proposed development. A school http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 6 board shall use information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 21.6,136 when preparing the district educational facilities plan pursuant to s. 1013,35, as modified and agreed to by the local governments, when provided by interlocal agreement, and the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse, in consideration of local governments' population projections, to ensure that the district educational facilities plan not only reflects enrollment projections but also considers applicable municipal and county growth and development projections. The projections must be apportioned geographically with assistance from the local governments using local government trend data and the school district student enrollment data. A school board is precluded from siting a new school in a jurisdiction where the school board has failed to provide the annual educational facilities plan for the prior year required pursuant to s. 1013.35 unless the failure is corrected. (10) The location of educational facilities shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan of the appropriate local governing body developed under part II of chapter 163 and consistent with the plan's implementing land development regulations. (11) To improve coordination relative to potential educational facility sites, a board shall provide written notice to the local government that has regulatory authority over the use of the land consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8) at least 60 days prior to acquiring or teasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility. The local government, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the board within 45 days if the site proposed for acquisition or lease is consistent with the land use categories and policies of the local government's comprehensive plan. This preliminary notice does not constitute the local government's determination of consistency pursuant to subsection (12). (12) As early in the design phase as feasible and consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8), but no later than 90 days before commencing construction, the district school board shall in writing request a determination of consistency with the local government's comprehensive plan. The local governing body that regulates the use of land shall determine, in writing within 45 days after receiving the necessary information and a school board's request for a determination, whether a proposed educational facility is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and consistent with local land development regulations. If the determination is affirmative, school construction may commence and further local government approvals are not required, except as provided in this section. Failure of the local governing body to make a determination in writing within 90 days after a district school board's request for a determination of consistency shall be considered an approval of the district school board's application. Campus master plans and development agreements must comply with the provisions of ss. 101.3.30 and 1013.63. (13) A local governing body may not deny the site applicant based on adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of the school. If the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses, the local government may not deny the application but it may impose reasonable development standards and conditions in accordance with s. 1013...51(1) and consider the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 6 of 6 not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed and consistent with the interlocal agreement required by subsections (2) -(8). (14) This section does not prohibit a local governing body and district school board from agreeing and establishing an alternative process for reviewing a proposed educational facility and site plan, and offsite impacts, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). (15) Existing schools shall be considered consistent with the applicable local government comprehensive plan adopted under part II of chapter 163. If a board submits an application to expand an existing school site, the local governing body may impose reasonable development standards and conditions on the expansion only, and in a manner consistent with s. 1013.51(1). Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed. Local government review or approval is not required for: (a) The placement of temporary or portable classroom facilities; or (b) Proposed renovation or construction on existing school sites, with the exception of construction that changes the primary use of a facility, includes stadiums, or results in a greater than 5 percent increase in student capacity, or as mutually agreed upon, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). History. - -s. 23, ch. 2002 -296; s. 828, ch. 2002 -387; s. 129, ch. 2003 -1; s. 18, ch. 2005 -290. Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search string =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 35 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 5 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chanter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.35 School district educational facilities plan; definitions; preparation, adoption, and amendment; long -term work programs. -- (1) DEFINITIONS. - -As used in this section, the term: (a) "Adopted educational facilities plan' means the comprehensive planning document that is adopted annually by the district school board as provided in subsection (2) and that contains the educational plant survey. (b) "District facilities work program" means the 5 -year listing of capital outlay projects adopted by the district school board as provided in subparagraph (2)(a)2. and paragraph (2)(b) as part of the district educational facilities plan, which is required in order to: 1. Properly maintain the educational plant and ancillary facilities of the district. 2. Provide an adequate number of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment of the district in K -12 programs in accordance with the goal in s. 101.3,21. (c) "Tentative educational facilities plan' means the comprehensive planning document prepared annually by the district school board and submitted to the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse and the affected general - purpose local governments. (2) PREPARATION OF TENTATIVE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN. -- (a) Annually, prior to the adoption of the district school budget, each district school board shall prepare a tentative district educational facilities plan that includes long -range planning for facilities needs over 5 -year, 10 -year, and 20 -year periods. The plan must be developed in coordination with the general - purpose local governments and be consistent with the local government comprehensive plans. The school board's plan for provision of new schools must meet the needs of all growing communities in the district, ranging from small rural communities to large urban cities. The plan must include: 1. Projected student populations apportioned geographically at the local level. The projections must be based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216.136, where available, as modified by the district based on development data and agreement with the local governments and the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lay_Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 35 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 5 Clearinghouse. The projections must be apportioned geographically with assistance from the local governments using local development trend data and the school district student enrollment data. 2. An inventory of existing school facilities. Any anticipated expansions or closures of existing school sites over the 5 -year, 10 -year, and 20 -year periods must be identified. The inventory must include an assessment of areas proximate to existing schools and identification of the need for improvements to infrastructure, safety, including safe access routes, and conditions in the community. The plan must also provide a listing of major repairs and renovation projects anticipated over the period of the plan. 3. Projections of facilities space needs, which may not exceed the norm space and occupant design criteria established in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities. 4. Information on leased, loaned, and donated space and relocatables used for conducting the district's instructional programs. 5. The general location of public schools proposed to be constructed over the 5 -year, 10 -year, and 20- year time periods, including a listing of the proposed schools' site acreage needs and anticipated capacity and maps showing the general locations. The school board's identification of general locations of future school sites must be based on the school siting requirements of s. 163,3177(6)(a) and policies in the comprehensive plan which provide guidance for appropriate locations for school sites. 6. The identification of options deemed reasonable and approved by the school board which reduce the need for additional permanent student stations. Such options may include, but need not be limited to: a. Acceptable capacity; b. Redistricting; c. Busing; d. Year -round schools; e. Charter schools; f. Magnet schools; and g. Public - private partnerships. 7. The criteria and method, jointly determined by the local government and the school board, for determining the impact of proposed development to public school capacity. (b) The plan must also include a financially feasible district facilities work program for a 5 -year period. The work program must include: 1. A schedule of major repair and renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational facilities http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013 -> Section 35 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 5 and ancillary facilities of the district. 2. A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K -12 programs. This schedule shall consider: a. The locations, capacities, and planned utilization rates of current educational facilities of the district. The capacity of existing satisfactory facilities, as reported in the Florida Inventory of School Houses must be compared to the capital outlay full - time - equivalent student enrollment as determined by the department, including all enrollment used in the calculation of the distribution formula in s. 1013.64. b. The proposed locations of planned facilities, whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all affected local governments, and recommendations for infrastructure and other improvements to land adjacent to existing facilities. The provisions of ss. 1413,_33(12), (13), and (14) and 1013.36 must be addressed for new facilities planned within the first 3 years of the work plan, as appropriate. c. Plans for the use and location of relocatable facilities, leased facilities, and charter school facilities. d. Plans for multitrack scheduling, grade level organization, block scheduling, or other alternatives that reduce the need for additional permanent student stations. e. Information concerning average class size and utilization rate by grade level within the district which will result if the tentative district facilities work program is fully implemented. f. The number and percentage of district students planned to be educated in relocatable facilities during each year of the tentative district facilities work program. For determining future needs, student capacity may not be assigned to any relocatable classroom that is scheduled for elimination or replacement with a permanent educational facility in the current year of the adopted district educational facilities plan and in the district facilities work program adopted under this section. Those relocatable classrooms clearly identified and scheduled for replacement in a school - board - adopted, financially feasible, 5 -year district facilities work program shall be counted at zero capacity at the time the work program is adopted and approved by the school board. However, if the district facilities work program is changed and the relocatable classrooms are not replaced as scheduled in the work program, the classrooms must be reentered into the system and be counted at actual capacity. Relocatable classrooms may not be perpetually added to the work program or continually extended for purposes of circumventing this section. All relocatable classrooms not identified and scheduled for replacement, including those owned, lease - purchased, or leased by the school district, must be counted at actual student capacity. The district educational facilities plan must identify the number of relocatable student stations scheduled for replacement during the 5 -year survey period and the total dollar amount needed for that replacement. g. Plans for the closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues. http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 35 : Online Sunshine Page 4 of 5 h. Projects for which capital outlay and debt service funds accruing under s. 9(d), Art. XI of the State Constitution are to be used shall be identified separately in priority order on a project priority list within the district facilities work program. 3. The projected cost for each project identified in the district facilities work program. For proposed projects for new student stations, a schedule shall be prepared comparing the planned cost and square footage for each new student station, by elementary, middle, and high school levels, to the low, average, and high cost of facilities constructed throughout the state during the most recent fiscal year for which data is available from the Department of Education. 4. A schedule of estimated capital outlay revenues from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditure on the projects included in the district facilities work program. 5. A schedule indicating which projects included in the district facilities work program will be funded from current revenues projected in subparagraph 4. 6. A schedule of options for the generation of additional revenues by the district for expenditure on projects identified in the district facilities work program which are not funded under subparagraph 5. Additional anticipated revenues may include effort index grants, SIT Program awards, and Classrooms First funds. (c) To the extent available, the tentative district educational facilities plan shall be based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to s. 216,1_36, (d) Provision shall be made for public comment concerning the tentative district educational facilities plan. (e) The district school board shall coordinate with each affected local government to ensure consistency between the tentative district educational facilities plan and the local government comprehensive plans of the affected local governments during the development of the tentative district educational facilities plan. (f) Commencing on October 1, 2002, and not less than once every 5 years thereafter, the district school board shall contract with a qualified, independent third party to conduct a financial management and performance audit of the educational planning and construction activities of the district. An audit conducted by the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability and the Auditor General pursuant to s. 1908.3.5 satisfies this requirement. (3) SUBMITTAL OF TENTATIVE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT. - -The district school board shall submit a copy of its tentative district educational facilities plan to all affected local governments prior to adoption by the board. The affected local governments shall review the tentative district educational facilities plan and comment to the district school board on the http: / /www. leg .state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 35 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 5 consistency of the plan with the local comprehensive plan, whether a comprehensive plan amendment will be necessary for any proposed educational facility, and whether the local government supports a necessary comprehensive plan amendment. If the local government does not support a comprehensive plan amendment for a proposed educational facility, the matter shall be resolved pursuant to the interlocal agreement when required by ss. 163- ,31.77(6)(h), 163.31777, and 1013._33(2). The process for the submittal and review shall be detailed in the interlocal agreement when required pursuant to ss. 163.3177(6)(h), 163.31777, and 1013. 33(2). (4) ADOPTED DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN. -- Annually, the district school board shall consider and adopt the tentative district educational facilities plan completed pursuant to subsection (2). Upon giving proper notice to the public and local governments and opportunity for public comment, the district school board may amend the plan to revise the priority of projects, to add or delete projects, to reflect the impact of change orders, or to reflect the approval of new revenue sources which may become available. The adopted district educational facilities plan shall: (a) Be a complete, balanced, and financially feasible capital outlay financial plan for the district. (b) Set forth the proposed commitments and planned expenditures of the district to address the educational facilities needs of its students and to adequately provide for the maintenance of the educational plant and ancillary facilities, including safe access ways from neighborhoods to schools. (5) EXECUTION OF ADOPTED DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN.- -The first year of the adopted district educational facilities plan shall constitute the capital outlay budget required in s. 1013,41, The adopted district educational facilities plan shall include the information required in subparagraphs (2)(b) 1., 2., and 3., based upon projects actually funded in the plan. History. - -s. 17, ch. 2002 -296; s. 830, ch. 2002 -387; s. 130, ch. 2003 -1 Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement •Contact Us http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 36 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 2 Select Year: 2007 do The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chanter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.36 Site planning and selection. -- (1) Before acquiring property for sites, each district school board and community college board of trustees shall determine the location of proposed educational centers or campuses. In making this determination, the board shall consider existing and anticipated site needs and the most economical and practicable locations of sites. The board shall coordinate with the long -range or comprehensive plans of local, regional, and state governmental agencies to assure the consistency of such plans. Boards are encouraged to locate district educational facilities proximate to urban residential areas to the extent possible, and shall seek to collocate district educational facilities with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, to the extent possible and to encourage using elementary schools as focal points for neighborhoods. (2) Each new site selected must be adequate in size to meet the educational needs of the students to be served on that site by the original educational facility or future expansions of the facility through renovation or the addition of relocatables. (3) Sites recommended for purchase or purchased must meet standards prescribed in law and such supplementary standards as the State Board of Education prescribes to promote the educational interests of the students. Each site must be well drained and suitable for outdoor educational purposes as appropriate for the educational program or collocated with facilities to serve this purpose. As provided in s. 333,03, the site must not be located within any path of flight approach of any airport. Insofar as is practicable, the site must not adjoin a right -of -way of any railroad or through highway and must not be adjacent to any factory or other property from which noise, odors, or other disturbances, or at which conditions, would be likely to interfere with the educational program. To the extent practicable, sites must be chosen which will provide safe access from neighborhoods to schools. (4) It shall be the responsibility of the board to provide adequate notice to appropriate municipal, county, regional, and state governmental agencies for requested traffic control and safety devices so they can be installed and operating prior to the first day of classes or to satisfy itself that every reasonable effort has been made in sufficient time to secure the installation and operation of such necessary devices prior to the first day of classes. It shall also be the responsibility of the board to review annually traffic control and safety device needs and to request all necessary changes indicated by such review. (5) Each board may request county and municipal governments to construct and maintain sidewalks and http: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 36 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 2 bicycle trails within a 2 -mile radius of each educational facility within the jurisdiction of the local government. When a board discovers or is aware of an existing hazard on or near a public sidewalk, street, or highway within a 2 -mite radius of a school site and the hazard endangers the life or threatens the health or safety of students who walk, ride bicycles, or are transported regularly between their homes and the school in which they are enrolled, the board shall, within 24 hours after discovering or becoming aware of the hazard, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, report such hazard to the governmental entity within the jurisdiction of which the hazard is located. Within 5 days after receiving notification by the board, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, the governmental entity shall investigate the hazardous condition and either correct it or provide such precautions as are practicable to safeguard students until the hazard can be permanently corrected. However, if the governmental entity that has jurisdiction determines upon investigation that it is impracticable to correct the hazard, or if the entity determines that the reported condition does not endanger the life or threaten the health or safety of students, the entity shall, within 5 days after notification by the board, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, inform the board in writing of its reasons for not correcting the condition. The governmental entity, to the extent allowed by law, shall indemnify the board from any liability with respect to accidents or injuries, if any, arising out of the hazardous condition. (6) If the school board and local government have entered into an interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 10133(2) and either s. 163.3177(6)(h)4. or s. 163.31777 or have developed a process to ensure consistency between the local government comprehensive plan and the school district educational facilities plan, site planning and selection must be consistent with the interlocal agreements and the plans. History. - -s. 22, ch. 2002 -296; s. 831, ch. 2002 -387; s. 132, ch. 2003 -1 Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Pn_v_acy Statement • Contact t!s http: / /www.leg.state.fl.usl statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &S earch_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 37 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 4 Select Year: 2007 Go The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 Yiew Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.37 State uniform building code for public educational facilities construction. -- (1) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. - -A uniform statewide building code for the planning and construction of public educational and ancillary plants by district school boards and community college district boards of trustees shall be adopted by the Florida Building Commission within the Florida Building Code, pursuant to s. 553.73. Included in this code must be flood plain management criteria in compliance with the rules and regulations in 44 C.F.R. parts 59 and 60, and subsequent revisions thereto which are adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. It is also the responsibility of the department to develop, as a part of the uniform building code, standards relating to: (a) Prefabricated facilities or factory-built facilities that are designed to be portable, relocatable, demountable, or reconstructible; are used primarily as classrooms; and do not fall under the provisions of ss. 620,822.320.862. Such standards must permit boards to contract with the Department of Community Affairs for factory inspections by certified building code inspectors to certify conformance with applicable law and rules. The standards must comply with the requirements of s. 1016,20 for relocatable facilities intended for long -term use as classroom space, and the relocatable facilities shall be designed subject to missile impact criteria of s. 423(24)(d)(1) of the Florida Building Code when located in the windborne debris region. (b) The sanitation of educational and ancillary plants and the health of occupants of educational and ancillary plants. (c) The safety of occupants of educational and ancillary plants as provided in s. 1013,12, except that the firesafety criteria shall be established by the State Fire Marshal in cooperation with the Florida Building Commission and the department and such firesafety requirements must be incorporated into the Florida Fire Prevention Code. (d) Accessibility for children, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 553.512_ (e) The performance of life -cycle cost analyses on alternative architectural and engineering designs to evaluate their energy efficiencies. 1. The life -cycle cost analysis must consist of the sum of: a. The reasonably expected fuel costs over the life of the building which are required to maintain hnp: / /www.leg. state.fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Disp lay_Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : ->2007->Ch 10 13 ->Section 37 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 4 illumination, water heating, temperature, humidity, ventilation, and all other energy - consuming equipment in a facility; and b. The reasonable costs of probable maintenance, including labor and materials, and operation of the building. 2. For computation of the life -cycle costs, the department shall develop standards that must include, but need not be limited to: a. The orientation and integration of the facility with respect to its physical site. b. The amount and type of glass employed in the facility and the directions of exposure. c. The effect of insulation incorporated into the facility design and the effect on solar utilization of the properties of external surfaces. d. The variable occupancy and operating conditions of the facility and subportions of the facility. e. An energy- consumption analysis of the major equipment of the facility's heating, ventilating, and cooling system; lighting system; and hot water system and all other major energy - consuming equipment and systems as appropriate. 3. Life -cycle cost criteria published by the Department of Education for use in evaluating projects. 4. Standards for construction materials and systems based on life -cycle costs that consider initial costs, maintenance costs, custodial costs, operating costs, and life expectancy. The standards may include multiple acceptable materials. It is the intent of the Legislature to require district school boards to comply with these standards when expending funds from the Public Education Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust Fund or the School District and Community College District Capital Outlay and Debt Service Trust Fund and to prohibit district school boards from expending local capital outlay revenues for any project that includes materials or systems that do not comply with these standards, unless the district school board submits evidence that alternative materials or systems meet or exceed standards developed by the department. It is not a purpose of the Florida Building Code to inhibit the use of new materials or innovative techniques; nor may it specify or prohibit materials by brand names. The code must be flexible enough to cover all phases of construction so as to afford reasonable protection for the public safety, health, and general welfare. The department may secure the service of other state agencies or such other assistance as it finds desirable in recommending to the Florida Building Commission revisions to the code. (2) APPROVAL. -- (a) Before a contract has been let for the construction, the department, the district school board, the http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution : View Statutes :- >2007- >Chl013- >Section 37 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 4 community college board, or its authorized review agent must approve the phase III construction documents. A district school board or a community college board may reuse prototype plans on another site, provided the facilities list and phase III construction documents have been updated for the new site and for compliance with the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code and any laws relating to firesafety, health and sanitation, casualty safety, and requirements for the physically handicapped which are in effect at the time a construction contract is to be awarded. (b) In reviewing plans for approval, the department, the district school board, the community college board, or its review agent as authorized in s. 1_013._3 @, shall take into consideration: 1. The need for the new facility. 2. The educational and ancillary plant planning. 3. The architectural and engineering planning. 4. The location on the site. 5. Plans for future expansion. 6. The type of construction. 7. Sanitary provisions. 8. Conformity to Florida Building Code standards. 9. The structural design and strength of materials proposed to be used. 10. The mechanical design of any heating, air - conditioning, plumbing, or ventilating system. Typical heating, ventilating, and air - conditioning systems preapproved by the department for specific applications may be used in the design of educational facilities. 11. The electrical design of educational plants. 12. The energy efficiency and conservation of the design. 13. Life -cycle cost considerations. 14. The design to accommodate physically handicapped persons. 15. The ratio of net to gross square footage. 16. The proposed construction cost per gross square foot. 17. Conformity with the Florida Fire Prevention Code. http: / /www.leg. state. fl. us /statuteslindex.cfm ?App_ mode= Display _Statute &S earch_String =... 9/5/2007 .+•.+.uwu w �.vam tuuuvu I a otatutW .-icvv /-lLl Ivl J- 1CCGnV11 J I. V111111C Junsnlne rage 4 Or 4 (c) The district school board or the community college board may not occupy a facility until the project has been inspected to verify compliance with statutes, rules, and codes affecting the health and safety of the occupants. Verification of compliance with rules, statutes, and codes for nonoccupancy projects such as roofing, paving, site improvements, or replacement of equipment may be certified by the architect or engineer of record, and verification of compliance for other projects may be made by an inspector certified by the department or certified pursuant to chapter 468 who is not the architect or engineer of record. The board shall maintain a record of the project's completion and permanent archive of phase III construction documents, including any addenda and change orders to the project. The boards shall provide project data to the department, as requested, for purposes and reports needed by the Legislature. (3) REVIEW PROCEDURE. - -The Commissioner of Education shall cooperate with the Florida Building Commission in addressing all questions, disputes, or interpretations involving the provisions of the Florida Building Code which govern the construction of public educational and ancillary facilities, and any objections to decisions made by the inspectors or the department must be submitted in writing. (4) BIENNIAL REVIEW AND UPDATE; DISSEMINATION. - -The department shall biennially review and recommend to the Florida Building Commission updates and revisions to the provisions of the Florida Building Code which govern the construction of public educational and ancillary facilities. The department shall publish and make available to each board at no cost copies of the state requirements for educational facilities and each amendment and revision thereto. The department shall make additional copies available to all interested persons at a price sufficient to recover costs. (5) LOCAL LEGISLATION PROHIBITED. - -After June 30, 1985, pursuant to s. 11(a)(21), Art. III of the State Constitution, there shall not be enacted any special act or general law of local application which proposes to amend, alter, or contravene any provisions of the State Building Code adopted under the authority of this section. History. - -s. 834, ch. 2002 -387. Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Ply Statement . Contact Us http: / /www.leg. state. fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 51 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 2 Select Year: 2007 6 o The 2007 Florida Statutes Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.51 Expenditures authorized for certain infrastructure. -- (1)(a) Subject to exemption from the assessment of fees pursuant to s. 1013.37(1), education boards, boards of county commissioners, municipal boards, and other agencies and boards of the state may expend funds, separately or collectively, by contract or agreement, for the placement, paving, or maintaining of any road, byway, or sidewalk if the road, byway, or sidewalk is contiguous to or runs through the property of any educational plant or for the maintenance or improvement of the property of any educational plant or of any facility on such property. Expenditures may also be made for sanitary sewer, water, stormwater, and utility improvements upon, or contiguous to, and for the installation, operation, and maintenance of traffic control and safety devices upon, or contiguous to, any existing or proposed educational plant. (b) A board may pay its proportionate share of the cost of onsite and offsite system improvements necessitated by the educational facility development, but a board is not required to pay for or install any improvements that exceed those required to meet the onsite and offsite needs of a new public educational facility or an expanded site. Development exactions assessed against school boards or community college districts may not exceed the proportionate share of the cost of system improvements necessitated by the educational facility development and may not address existing facility or service backlogs or deficits. (c) The boards of county commissioners, municipal boards, and other agencies and boards of the state may plant or maintain trees, flowers, shrubbery, and beautifying plants upon the grounds of any educational plant, upon approval of the superintendent or president or the designee of either of them. Payment by a board for any improvement set forth in this section shall be authorized in any amounts agreed to by the board. Any payments so authorized to be made are not mandatory unless the specific improvement and costs have been agreed to prior to the improvement's being made. (2) The provisions of any law, municipal ordinance, or county ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, the provisions of this section regulate the levying of assessments for special benefits on school or community college districts and the directing of the payment thereof. Any municipal ordinance or county ordinance making provision to the contrary is void. (3) Notwithstanding any other law, if a board agrees to construct or upgrade water or sewer facilities, or otherwise provide, construct, upgrade, or maintain offsite infrastructure beyond its proportionate share of responsibility, the local government that issues development approvals shall assure that the http: / /www.leg. state. fl.us/ statutes /index.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 ....,...,.... ................,� .- ic.vv.- i�.aiivi.i- i.�wuvit �.. vuiiuc OU11611uic ragc c Lit L board is reimbursed for the additional costs incurred, to the extent that other development occurs which demands use of such infrastructure. (4) Expenditure for infrastructure for universities shall be as authorized in s. 1013.30 History. - -s. 851, ch. 2002 -387. Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement . Contact Us http: / /www. leg .state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute&Search_String =... 9/5/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2007- >Ch1013- >Section 371 : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 2 The 2007 Florida Statutes Iitle XLVJll K -20 EDUCATION CODE 1013.371 Conformity to codes. -- Select Year: 2007 GoI Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES (1) CONFORMITY TO FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL. -- (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), all public educational and ancillary plants constructed by a board must conform to the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, and the plants are exempt from all other state building codes; county, municipal, or other local amendments to the Florida Building Code and local amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code; building permits, and assessments of fees for building permits, except as provided in s. 85380; ordinances; road closures; and impact fees or service availability fees. Any inspection by local or state government must be based on the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Each board shall provide for periodic inspection of the proposed educational plant during each phase of construction to determine compliance with the state requirements for educational facilities. (b) A board may comply with the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code and the administration of the codes when constructing ancillary plants that are not attached to educational facilities, if those plants conform to the space size requirements established in the codes. (c) A board may not approve any plans for the construction, renovation, remodeling, or demolition of any educational or ancillary plants unless these plans conform to the requirements of the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Each board may adopt policies for delegating to the district school superintendent, community college president, or university president authority for submitting documents to the department and for awarding contracts subsequent to and consistent with board approval of the scope, timeframes, funding source, and budget of a survey- recommended project. (2) ENFORCEMENT BY BOARD. - -It is the responsibility of each board to ensure that all plans and educational and ancillary plants meet the standards of the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code and to provide for the enforcement of these codes in the areas of its jurisdiction. Each board shall provide for the proper supervision and inspection of the work. Each board may employ a chief building official or inspector and such other inspectors, who have been certified pursuant to chapter 468, and such personnel as are necessary to administer and enforce the provisions of this code. Boards may also use local building department inspectors who are certified by the department to enforce this code. Plans or facilities that fail to meet the standards of the Florida Building Code or the Florida Fire Prevention Code may not be approved. When planning for and constructing an educational, http: / /www.leg. state.fl.uslstatuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search string =... 9/5/2007 . LQLULCa Lx. w„suLUUUn . v Lew orawLCS :- xuvi- >k_nivij- »ecuon -1 i i : vntlne 3unsnme rage 2 of 2 auxiliary, or ancillary facility, a board must use construction materials and systems that meet standards adopted pursuant to s. 1013.37(1)(e)3. and 4. If the planned or actual construction of a facility deviates from the adopted standards, the board must, at a public hearing, quantify and compare the costs of constructing the facility with the proposed deviations and in compliance with the adopted standards and the Florida Building Code. The board must explain the reason for the proposed deviations and compare how the total construction costs and projected life -cycle costs of the facility or component system of the facility would be affected by implementing the proposed deviations rather than using materials and systems that meet the adopted standards. (3) ENFORCEMENT BY DEPARTMENT. - -As a further means of ensuring that all educational and ancillary facilities constructed or materially altered or added to conform to the Florida Building Code standards or Florida Fire Prevention Code standards, each board that undertakes the construction, renovation, remodeling, purchasing, or lease - purchase of any educational plant or ancillary facility, the cost of which exceeds $200,000, may submit plans to the department for approval. History. - -s. 835, ch. 2002 -387. Copyright ®1995 -2007 The Florida Legislature • Priv_acy Statement • Contact us http: / /www. leg. state.fl.us /statuteslindex.cfm? App_ mode = Display _Statute &Search_String =... 9/5/2007 >M� H O x w a O v GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS 2005 CYCLE ADOPTION Hearings CCPC : November 15 & 261 2007 BCC: December 4, 2007 7Z% AGENDA December 4, 2007 9:00 a.m. School Concurrency Amendment Transmittal Hearing 2005 Cycle Amendments Adoption Hearing Jim Coletta, Chairman District 5 Tom Henning, Vice Chairman, District 3 Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1 Frank Halas, Commissioner, District 2 Fred W. Coyle, Commissioner District 4 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. December 4, 2007 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. 2007 Growth Management Plan Amendment Transmittal Hearing: A. Petition: CPSP- 2007 -7. Petition creating a new Public School Facilities Element with support document, and amending the Capital Improvement Element and Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Growth Management Plan to establish a public school concurrency program. This is a companion item to the School Concurrency Inter - local Agreement between the Collier County District School Board and Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the cities of Marco Island, Everglades and Naples. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] 3. 2005 Cycle Growth Management Plan Amendments Adoption Hearing: A. CP- 2005 -2, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Mao Series, to expand 'Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center', to allow medical/ medical related uses and professional office uses, for property located at the Southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 1s' Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7t acres. [Coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] B. CP- 2005 -6, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Mai) (GGAMP /FLUM) and Mao Series to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3± acres. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] C. CP- 2005 -9, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Mai) (FLUM) and Mai) Series to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 70,000 square feet of lower order retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] December 4, 2007 D. CP- 2005 -13, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Man Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non - church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, offering 150 of up to 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] E. CPSP- 2005 -14, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Mar) (FLUM) and North Belle Meade Overlay Mar), part of the Future Land Use Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 20 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 13 and 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of ±283 acres total. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] F. CPSP- 2005 -15, Petition requesting an amendment to the Transportation Element (TE), to add new Policies 3.5 and 3.6, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. G. [Coordinator: Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Planning Director] H. CPSP - 2005 -16, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Wellfields and ASRs Map. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] CP- 2006 -4, Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan GGAMP , to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria provision, to allow a church as a special exception to locational criteria, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and ±300' east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 2.6± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] 4. Adjourn 3 December 4, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Hearing for the 2005 Cycle of Growth Management Plan Amendments. (Adoption Hearing) For the Board of County Commissioners to review the 2005 cycle of amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan and consider approving (adopting) said amendments for their transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. CONSIDERATIONS- • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • Resolution 97 -431, as amended, provides for a public petition process to amend the Collier County GMP. • The 2005 cycle of amendments consists of five private sector petitions and three County - initiated petitions. The cycle began with sixteen petitions but four were withdrawn and five were not approved for transmittal by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The remaining seven petitions approved for transmittal by the BCC, and one added at this adoption stage, are addressed herein. • The Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held their transmittal hearings, for select petitions, on February 7 and March 7, 2007. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their transmittal hearings on February 20, March 5, 22 and 29, and April 19, 2007. The BCC held their transmittal hearings on June 4, 5 and 22, and July 24, 2007. The Transmittal hearing recommendations of Staff, EAC, CCPC and BCC are contained in the CCPC adoption hearing Staff Report. • The Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), dated October 8, 2007, contained Objections and Recommendations regarding two petitions: CPSP- 2005 -14, the proposed re- designation of certain Sending Lands to Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands; and, petition CPSP- 2005 -15, the proposed addition of thoroughfare corridor protection policies in the Transportation Element.. The ORC Report is contained in the back -up materials. The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) offered comments regarding adequacy of potable water supply, pertaining to petition CP- 2005 -6; the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) offered comments regarding impacts upon environmentally sensitive natural resources, pertaining to petition CPSP - 2005 -15; and, the Florida Division of Forestry (DOF) offered comments regarding effects of proposed uses on their prescribed burn program on nearby State lands, pertaining to petition CP- 2005 -13. • Staff's response to the ORC Report is contained in the CCPC Adoption Staff Report and is reflected in revised text and map Ordinance exhibits. Additionally, regarding the SFWMD comments, the petitioner provided the requested water supply data; regarding the DEP comments (and DCA's Objection in the ORC Report), staff revised the proposed policies; 1 and, regarding the DOF comments, staff notes that most, if not all, of the uses at issue are already allowed in the existing PUD zoning on the subject site. The EAC held their adoption hearing, for select petitions, on November 7, 2007. The CCPC held their adoption hearing on November 26, 2007 (continued from advertised date of November 15). Five of the seven petitions heard at BCC transmittal hearings have been modified since those hearings (all but CP- 2005 -9 and CP- 2006 -4), as noted herein. This adoption hearing considers amendments to the following Elements of the Plan: 0 Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map and Map Series 0 Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Future Land Use Map and Map Series 0 Transportation Element. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Executive Summary and GMP amendment ordinance has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office for legal sufficiency. FISCAL IMPACT: There are fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of all three County - initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan. Petition CPSP- 2005 -14 will require a subsequent amendment to a map in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), which will be prepared by staff. Petition CPSP- 2005 -15 will require the preparation of an implementing ordinance and maps, which will be prepared both by staff and outside consultants at an estimated cost of $25,000.00. However, implementation of this amendment through the subsequently adopted ordinance and maps is expected to result in significant annual savings in right -of -way acquisition costs, and damages claims associated with right -of -way acquisition, though both are difficult to quantify. One estimate is that right -of -way acquisition cost savings could be between ''4 to 1 million dollars annually, though variables involved (such as rural vs. urban roadway) could result in greater or lesser savings. Petition CPSP- 2005 -16 will require a subsequent amendment to maps in the LDC, which will be prepared by staff. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This is an adoption public hearing for the 2005 cycle of amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) will have 45 days to review the adopted Plan amendments for compliance with Chapter 163, F.S. and Rule 9J- 5 F.A.C., and to file a "Notice of Intent" to find the amendments "in compliance" or not "in compliance." If determined to be "in compliance ", and timely challenge to that determination is not filed by an affected party within 21 days, then the amendments will become effective. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Listed plant or animal species may have been observed or known to be on one or more of the sites encompassed by these amendments, and one or more of the sites may contain jurisdictional wetlands. No particular issues have been identified relative to groundwater resources or soils; petition CPSP- 2005 -16 seeks to protect groundwater resources via expansion/modification of 2 wellfield protection areas. During review of subsequent development orders, the sites will be subject to all applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Potentially, one or more of these amendments may contain lands identified as having historical or archaeological importance. During review of subsequent development orders, the sites will be subject to all applicable local, state and federal historical and archaeological protection regulations. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation follows each individual petition listed below. Also, where staff has recommended text changes, they are depicted on the attached document titled CCPC Recommendations. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (EACI RECOMMENDATION: Growth Management Plan amendments such as these are not reviewed by the EAC, except for petitions CPSP - 2005 -14, 15 and 16. The EAC held its hearing on these petitions November 7, 2007, and recommended approval per staff's recommendation. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPCI RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission held its required public hearing on November 26, 2007 (advertised for Nov. 15 but continued without discussion of petitions). The CCPC recommendation follows each individual petition listed below. A more detailed account of the CCPC recommendations - containing specific text changes, as applicable — is attached in the CCPC Recommendations document. 1. PETITION CP- 2005 -2, requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP/FLUM) and Map Series, to expand "Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center", to allow medical/ medical related uses and professional office uses, for property located at the Southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 1" Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7t acres. [coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -2 to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt and not to transmit to DCA. Staff s alternative text revisions are contained in the CCPC Adoption Staff Report. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CP- 2005 -2, per staff's alternative text and as that text is modified to: 1) delete medical related uses from the minimum square footage requirement, and, 2) allow bollard lighting only unless other lighting is required by the LDC or other regulations, and transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (vote: 8/0). The CCPC's recommendation is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". 3 There were a total of five speakers, all in support of the petition to some degree. Two were in favor of the petition, as transmitted; one was in favor, but opposed to gym or wellness center, and medical - related uses; and, two were in favor but opposed to a gym. The application package includes copies of a post card survey indicating the respondents' land use preferences from the choices listed, and signed petition(s). 2. PETITION CP- 2005 -6, requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3,1: acres. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -6 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt, subject to three limitations outlined in the CCPC Adoption Staff Report and with no objection to the addition of item "g." for medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center, and transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CP- 2005 -6, as transmitted, and as further modified to add item "g." and to exclude private schools on the easterly most parcel (Tract 66), and transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (vote: 5/3). CCPC members opposed to the motion also wanted day care centers excluded from Tract 66. There were no public speakers. 3. PETITION CP- 2005 -9, requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 70,000 square feet of lower order retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest comer of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8t acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -9 to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC not adopt petition CP- 2005 -9. The text as approved for transmittal by the BCC is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. 4. PETITION CP- 2005 -13, requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non - church 4 sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, offering 150 of up to 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69t acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Subsequent to transmittal hearings, the petitioner proposed text revisions to: 1) clarify dwelling unit types allowed; 2) correctly identify the type and number of temporary units on site as ten mobile homes, not nine travel trailers, and lessen their temporary use time period from five years to two years; 3) alter the dwelling unit ratios in the two development phases — from 150 to 147 in phase one, and from 146 to 149 in phase two; and, 4) allow phase two dwelling units to be occupied prior to completion of improvements to the deficient segment of Davis Boulevard. Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -13 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt as transmitted, with no objection to the petitioner's post - transmittal revisions except for the allowance of occupancy in phase two prior to road improvements, and transmit to DCA. CCPC Recommendation: There is no official recommendation from the CCPC. A motion to recommend adoption, per staff's recommendation, failed by vote of 4/4. CCPC members in favor of the motion disagreed with the revision that would allow phase two dwelling units to be occupied prior to completion of improvements to the deficient segment of Davis Boulevard. The text as approved for transmittal by the BCC is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. 5. PETITION CPSP- 2005 -14, requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and North Belle Meade Overlay Map, part of the Future Land Use Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 12 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of +200 acres total. [Coordinator. David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -14 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt (re- designate the 12 map parcels or portions thereof as transmitted), as revised in response to the ORC Report to not re- designate +3.7 acres of map parcel 96, and transmit to DCA. Staff's revision is noted in the CCPC Adoption Staff Report. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CPSP- 2005 -14 as recommended by staff, and transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (vote: 8/0). The CCPC's recommendation is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. 6. PETITION CPSP- 2005 -15, requesting an amendment to the Transportation Element (TE), to add new Policies 3.5 and 3.6, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans 5 (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. [Coordinator: Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Planning Director] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -15 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt, as revised by staff in response to the ORC Report, and to transmit to DCA. Staff's revisions are contained in the CCPC Adoption Staff Report, as further modified in a handout provided at the CCPC hearing. EAC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CPSP- 2005 -15 as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CPSP- 2005 -15 as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA (vote: 5/3). CCPC members opposed to the motion expressed concern that the policies did not adequately insure protection of environmentally sensitive areas. The CCPC's recommendation is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. 7. PETITION CPSP- 2005 -16, requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map series map titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfzelds and ASRs Map. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -16 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt, and to transmit to DCA. CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CPSP- 2005 -16, as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA (vote: 7/0). The CCPC's recommendation is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. 8. PETITION CP- 20064, requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria provision, to allow a church as a special exception to locational criteria, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and ±300 feet east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 2.6± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] Staff Recommendation: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2006 -4 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt as transmitted. The transmitted text is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". CCPC Recommendation: That the BCC adopt petition CP- 2006 -4, as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA (vote: 8/0). The CCPC's recommendation is reflected in the Adoption Ordinance Exhibit "A ". There were no public speakers. One letter of support was received. M PREPARED BY: D' �� � -- DATE: 1117 B �, 7 David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department REVIEWED BY: �alvt4 (� DATE: H / d/(D7 Randy Cohen, A CP, Director Comprehensive Planning Department REVIEWED BY: )]"A (n 1 • 17{� yw ,D DATE: f 1(z S (O 4 Marjone�tuden— t -S g, Assistant County Mtomey Office of the County Attorney APPROVED BY: DATE: 112S;,-1a Jos K. Schmitt, Administrator Ct7oiunity Development & Environmental Services Division EX SUM Adoption 2005 cycle G: ComprehensrvelComp. Planning GMP DATA1Comp. Plan Amendments12005 petitions dw111 -27 -07 CCPC Recommendations November 26, 2007 Public Hearing on the 2005 Growth Management Plan Amendments Below is the text as approved for transmittal by the BCC, any revisions by applicant since transmittal, staff recommended text, and CCPC recommended text. (The Ordinance Exhibit A's reflect the CCPC recommended text; where CCPC did not recommend adoption, the Exhibit A's reflect the transmitted text as approved by BCC.) 1. CP- 2005 -2 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to expand "Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center", to allow medical/ medical related uses and professional office uses, for property located at the Southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 1st Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7t acres. Staff Recommendation: Not to adopt. Alternative text for adoption below. (All text is new, as approved for transmittal by BCC, but is not underlined so that staff's recommended changes, then CCPC 's recommended changes, can more easily be identified.) [Words underlined are added; words sirask tkreugh are deleted - as alternate staff text.] [new final bullet] • The following are additional restrictions and standards for apply to dw4evelegnrent of Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: : a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the followine uses shall be developed in a eampug setting aFe4hr ited to: * I. ** 2.medical offices and clinics and professional offices, except surveyors, and Imedical related uses, such as a wellness or-physieei theregy center, * ** b. The ordinance subsequent rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. grevide that no less than sixty (60 %) percent of the allowed perfrtitted gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics and medical related uses, ;_and * * ** 2. Hard; parking for the entire project shall be that required for prw4ded-at a mAie_sappeAive e€ medical office or clinic use; regrriFed by the Land Development Code (Ordinance_ #04 -41, as amended), so as to allow enabling 100 percent medical office use. * * * ** C. Pafkiag let lighting shall be r-estFieted te bellards eifeept as ffmy be r-equifed te meet afterial level lighting s4aftdar& 84 erAr-i8s. * * * * ** d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. Staff Notes: ' "Campus setting" is undefined in GMP & LDC; as such, implementation may be difficult. Phrase should be deleted unless can be described/defined in this amendment. Also, this property remains subject to all other Neighborhood Center requirements and restrictions, including use intensity ( "similar to C -1, C -2 or C -3 "). " Urgent care center use is included within medical offices and clinics use category. " Physical therapist use is included within medical offices and clinics use category. "Medical related uses" is a broadlvague term but would presumably include uses such as apothecary, and eyeglass center in addition to a wellness center. "Wellness center" itself is an undefined term in GMP & LDC. Staff believes it consists of multiple uses - physical fitness facility, physical therapy, and dietician services. Physical therapists & dieticians are included under medical offices and clinics (SIC 8049). Question is whether applicant intends physical fitness facility as stand -alone use (allowed in C -3) or as use integrated with other principal uses as understood by staff (allowed in C -1 & 2). Staff does not consider a physical fitness facility itself to be a medical related use. It may be appropriate and wise to further identity/list medical related uses or more clearly define in scope. " Wordsmithing for code language and clarity. LDC Section 4.05.04G., Table 17, contains these parking requirements: medicalldental office or clinic (outpatient care facility): 1 per 200 square feet; recreation facilities (indoor) ... or health club ...: 1 per 100 square feet. Wellness center is not a defined term in LDC; parking may be required as for a health club or possible as determined by the Director of Zoning and Land Development Review. Wordsmithing for code language. Policy 5.1.1 contains lighting requirements - which conflict with the petitioner's proposed text. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt staff's alternative text, as modified below. [Words underlined are added; words stFuGk thFaugh are deleted - as alternate staff text. Words double underlined are added; words double 6WJOI*414� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC.] b. The or inance aHbse"enf rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty (60 %) percent of the allowed pemiiaed gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics and mediesiyeisiei deee: wand C. '"'11 1'° �egErieiert -fci hFlllera '- , comply uirh ffteet at#easl level " at entfies in e Land Develonm nt Code (Ordinar&e #0441 as ended) and other ovemin r �- Pouey 5.1.1 Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. hi implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following standards: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low - pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low- pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they _ point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. 2. CP- 2005 -6 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3± acres. Staff Recommendation: Adopt as transmitted, with no objection to the addition of use "g. ", but subject to the following (so as to make the land owners "whole" following the loss of land along Golden Gate Parkway for its expansion, but not allow greater development than could have otherwise occurred): limit the development and uses on Tract 66 to stormwater management and preservation areas; limit the development and uses on Tract 59 to church and church - operated private school and /or day care; and, limit the development and uses on Tracts 43 and 50 to the existing David Lawrence Center use and to the amount of building expansion that could have occurred on those two tracts had 2.2 acres not been conveyed for right -of -way. (Ail text is new, as approved for transmittal by BCC, but is not underlined so that CCPCs recommended changes can more easily be identified.) Text as transmitted, and with addition of item "g. ", and with staffs "housecleaning" addition to item ".d" (both shown in single underline). 8. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of I -75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well - planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II). C. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David Lawrence Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 0441. as amended. e. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. f Day care centers associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt as transmitted, and as modified below. [Words underlined are added; words strask- fpreugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC.] h. Private schools associated with the David Lawrence Center or Parkway Community Church of God, for Tracts 43.50 and 59 only. 3. CP- 2005 -9 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict' for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 70,000 square feet of lower order retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8t acres. Text as transmitted: A. Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District 2. Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict comprising approximately 8 acres is located on the northwest comer of the hnmokalee Road/Platt Road intersection The pg=se of this Subdistrict is to provide neighborhood commercial uses - lower order retail, office and personal service uses - conveniently located to serve the surrounding rural area and passerby - traffic Development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD b. The Subdistrict shall be developed as a unified planned development with a common architectural theme. C. The Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum gross leasable floor area of 70.000 square feet d. Uses shall be limited to those permitted and conditional uses set forth in the C-2. Commercial Convenience, Zoning District of the Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance Number 04 -41, in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict e. At the time of rezoning, access shall be restricted as deemed appropriate so as to provide safe ingress and egress. f. At the time of rezoning, careful consideration shall be given to maximum building heigLts, maximum building floor area for each use or structure, maximum building floor area for the total site, landscaping and buffering requirements, building setbacks, and other site design considerations. as well as to allowable uses, so as to insure compatibility with surrounding uses and the rural character in which the Subdistrict is located. Further, since a private well and septic system will be utilized, allowable uses may be restricted so as to preclude those with high water demand (e.g. car washes) and those that utilize residual chemicals or solvents (e.g. dry cleaners). Staff Recommendation: Not to adopt. CCPC Recommendation: Not to adopt. 4. CP- 2005 -13 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict' for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non - church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, offering 150 of up to 296 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69t acres. Text as transmitted, and as subsequently revised by petitioner. (All text is new, as approved for transmittal by BCC, but is not underlined so that the petitioner's recommended changes, then staffs recommended changes, can more easily be identified.) [Words underlined are added; words stwsk- tHreugh are deleted — as proposed by petitioner.] 17. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict The Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one -half mile north of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide community facility uses, primarily institutional uses and other non - commercial uses generally serving the public at large, and residential uses, both affordable- workforce and market rate housing - all in a setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The Subdistrict is intended to contain a mix of uses and services in a self - sufficient environment, which lessens traffic impacts upon the external transportation network and public services, while serving the needs of the community at large. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Allowable land uses: 1) Community facilities such as churches, group housing uses, cemeteries, private schools and colleges. 2) Child care facilities. 3) Residential dwelling units, not to exceed 306 units. 4) Essential services, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. 5) Parks open space, and recreational uses. C. The maximum floor area for institutional and other non - residential uses, excluding single - family, and two - family and multi - family residential units, shall not exceed 368,000 square feet. d. Of the 306 dwelling units total, a maximum of ten (10) units shall be reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church - related personnel and their families. The 10 church - related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this Subdistrict. e. A requirement shall be put in place at the time of rezoning/PUD amendment that all but ten (10) tmve4 tfailers nine (9) mobile home units currently on site shall be removed from the subject property prior to the construction of any housing not reserved for church - related employees, staff and program participants. The ten nine remaining gavel tmilm mobile home units may serve as temporary adult care units for program participants and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent residential structures, permanent adult care units or within &,e (5)yeara twenty -four (24) months from the date of adoption of this Subdistrict, whichever is sooner. One hundred fifty forty -seven of the 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defied in the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan. g. To achieve the density of approximately 4.28 dwelling units per acre, and to allow development of the 192 non - church- related, non -base density dwelling units, the project shall comply with one or more of the following: 1) the Affordable - Workforce Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units — comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 4-58 147 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty- five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty -five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. h. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable - workforce housing dwelling units. i. At the time of rezoning /PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non - church- related dwelling units shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. j. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, consideration shall be given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord's Way beyond existing Land Development Code requirements. k. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be required to mitigate for the project's impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. 1. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 439 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10 church- related dwelling units. Phase Two development will consist of the remaining 446 149 market rate units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 446 149 market rate dwelling units in Phase Two, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete unless the 149 units are designated as a Community Workforce Housine Innovation Program (CWHIP) project or are available and offered fast to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, and in effect as described in item (2)(3) above. Staff Recommendation: Adopt as transmitted, and subsequently revised by petitioner, except as revised below. [Words underlined are added; words stFLIGk Epreugp are deleted - as proposed by petitioner.] Words double underlined are added; words double MFw@k tlwowgh are deleted - as recommended by staff. C. The maximum floor area for institutional and other non - residential uses shall not exceed 368,000 square feet. 1. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 4-50 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10 church - related dwelling units. Phase Two development will consist of the remaining 446 149 market rate units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 446 149 market rate dwelling units in Phase Two, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete. , 5. J CCPC Recommendation: No recommendation due to tie vote (4/4). CPSP- 2005 -14 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and North Belle Meade Overlay Map, part of the Future Land Use Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 12 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of +200 acres total. Staff Recommendation: Adopt for re- designation of all twelve parcels as transmitted, except exclude (do not re- designate) +3.7 acres in southeast quadrant of map parcel 96. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt per staff recommendation. CPSP- 2005 -15 Petition requesting an amendment to the Transportation Element (TE), to add new Policies 3.5 and 3.6, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. Staff Recommendation: Adopt as transmitted, and revised below. (All text is new, as approved for transmittal by BCC, but is not underlined so that staffs recommended changes can more easily be identified.) [Words underlined are added; words s4w&44muo are deleted.] Policy 3.5 Within one year of the effective date of this amendment, the County shall prepare and adopt a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan; and 2. adopt Corridor Preservation Maps, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables; and 3. limit the uses of land within the required corridor appropriately plan for the location of land uses, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources; and 4. provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables; and 5. provide for an approval process by the Board of County Commissioners for new or expanded corridors and 'intersection; and 6. provide a process for advanced reservation, donation, dedication or any other means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas. For the purposes of this Policy, protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established; or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies; or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to proposed grade separated intersections. All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02, e€-the Florida Statutes. Policy 3.6 In the event of ", t5Tea€ right -of -way acquisition or reservation for all yeses anyepurpose included in the expansion of existing transportation facilities by any federal, state, or local transportation department, authority, or agency, the requirements for buffering, native vegetation retention, preserve, setback and open space and/or any other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right -of -way acquisition or reservation may be reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or protection activities in accordance with standards established for the protection of natural resources. To ensure the protection of natural resources and direct incompatible land uses away environmentally sensitive resources, such reductions, modifications or eliminations shall be appreved guided by these standards as well as the priorities set forth in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Capital Improvement Element for right-of-way acquisition Wherever a reduction of standards occurs, it shall be mitigated on site when feasible through the appropriate mechanisms such as the purchase of additional land or other means. This Policy is not applicable to the expansion of transportation facilities in environmentally sensitive areas, as described in the Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) or the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) and standards for environmental protection shall be maintained during the acquisition of right-of-way. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt as recommended by staff. 7. CPSP- 2005 -16 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map series map titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map. Staff Recommendation: Adopt. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt per staff recommendation. 8. CP- 2006 -4 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria provision, to allow a church as a special exception to locational criteria, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and ±300 feet east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 2.6± acres. Text as transmitted: e) Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits submitted for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. Temporary Use permits for model homes shall have a duration of three (3) years from the date of approval. No subsequent issuance of a Conditional Use permit shall be for a duration exceeding two (2) years. The total time period for Temporary Use and Conditional Use permits together shall not exceed five (5) years. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as provided for in the Estates zoninlZ district is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates Unit 97 Staff Recommendation: Adopt as transmitted. CCPC Recommendation: Adopt per staff recommendation. CCPC Recommendations - Adoption 2005 cycle GAComprehensivakGomp. Planning GMP DATAIComp. Plan Amendments12005 Petitions dw/11 -29 -07 10 STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2007 4 not heard, continued to Nov. 26 SUBJECT: 2005 CYCLE OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS (ADOPTION HEARING) ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Transmittal hearings on these amendments were held on February 20, March 5, 22 and 29, and April 19, 2007 (CCPC), and on June 4, 5 and 22, and July 24, 2007 (BCC). The respective Transmittal recommendations /actions are presented below, following each petition number and title (including the EAC recommendations for those petitions heard -- by them). Note: This amendment cycle began with sixteen petitions; four were withdrawn at, or just prior to, CCPC hearing (CP- 2005 -1, 3, 4, and 8) and five were not approved for Transmittal by the BCC (CP- 2005 -5, 7, 10, 11, and 12). The remaining seven petitions approved for Transmittal by the BCC, and one added at this adoption stage, are addressed herein. Each CCPC staff report from the Transmittal hearings, which provides staffs analysis of each petition, is located behind the petition number tab, e.g. CP- 2005 -2, and in front of the petition package; each EAC staff report from the Adoption hearing (CPSP- 2005 -14, 15, 16 only) is located immediately behind the CCPC Transmittal staff report. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ORC REPORT: After review of Transmitted GMP amendments, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) renders an Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report. Only Objections can form the basis of a non - compliance determination, unless the adopted amendments vary significantly from those transmitted. If an Objection is not adequately addressed when adopted, then the DCA may (presumably will) find the amendment to be "Not in Compliance" with Florida Statutes, and issue a Notice of Intent (NOI) to indicate such noncompliance. The County may respond to the ORC Report in one of four ways at Adoption: 1. not modify the amendment, but provide additional explanation of what the amendment is about, its purpose, what it will achieve [appropriate if we believe DCA simply does not understand /has misunderstood the amendment] and /or provide additional data and analysis to support the amendment; or 2. modify the amendment, so as to address the ORC issue; or, 3. modify the amendment, and provide additional explanation and /or provide additional data and analysis; or, 4. not adopt the amendment. In their October 8, 2007 ORC Report for the 2005 cycle of GMP amendments, DCA offers two Objections, one pertaining to petition CPSP- 2005 -14 and one pertaining to CPSP- 2005 -15. These Objections are set forth below following each petition, along with staff response. The entire ORC Report, which includes responses from all review agencies, is included in the CCPC binder. Omitted is correspondence from Florida Wildlife Federation pertaining to map parcels 3 -10 within petition CPSP- 2005 -14, since these parcels have been withdrawn. PROPOSED AMENDMENT A. PETITION CP- 2005 -2 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to expand "Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center", to allow medical/ medical related uses and professional office uses, for property located at the Southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and I" Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7t acres. [Coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not to transmit to DCA. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Not to transmit to DCA (vote: 7/0). There were eleven speakers. One person was in favor; nine persons were opposed (stated reasons included: proposal is premature; favor the isolation from commercial development — willing to drive miles to nearest commercial; Golden Gate Estates is intended to be rural in character and this petition is incompatible with that; piecemeal approach to commercial siting is inappropriate; sets a precedent for similar requests in future); and, one person stated more opportunities for public input were needed. Subsequent to the CCPC hearing, the petitioner significantly revised the petition; rather than allowing C -1 through C -3 commercial uses per the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict (office, personal service, retail, etc), uses are now proposed to be limited to urgent care center, medical offices, medical- related uses such as wellness or physical therapy center, and professional offices. Additional data and analysis submitted includes a revised TIS, and a market study prepared for a GMP amendment submitted in the 2006 cycle directly across Golden Gate Blvd. (CP- 2006 -2 proposing 34+ acres of mixed use development including 225,000 s.f. of commercial uses, of which 8 acres and 54,000 s.f. are for office development). Also, the petitioner purports to have sent a letter with post card survey "to approximately 2800 Golden Gate Estates residents who reside within the immediate service area for our client's ... proposed GMP amendment, CP- 2005 -2" and that as of May 16, 488 post cards (17.5 %) were received with 96% of those favoring commercial development at the subject site. Staff was concerned that such a significant revision to the petition after the NIM had been held, and after the CCPC hearing had been held, subverted the public input process and the role of the CCPC. Nonetheless, staff reviewed the revised petition and support materials. As a result of that review, staff's findings, conclusions and recommendation did not change; the issues raised for the original petition were still valid for the revised petition. One specific point about the market study was that it apparently failed to include 16.3+ acres within the NW, SW and SE quadrants of the subject Neighborhood Center that are zoned E, Estates (the complete parcel inventory was not provided). This is especially relevant since the study showed such a small deficit (unmet need) of office space in the trade area - -- 22+ acres in 2005 and 27+ acres in 2010. Further, since the preferred use is medical office and urgent care center, staff suspects the trade area should be larger then the stated 2 miles; enlarging the trade area would increase the population, thus demand, but would also increase the available supply of land zoned - or designated so as to allow zoning - to allow these uses. BCC ACTION: Transmit the petitioner's modified text to DCA, and directed the petitioner to hold a Neighborhood Information Meeting prior to Adoption hearings (vote: 4/1). A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held on October 22, 2007, at which time the applicant explained the petition proposal as was approved for Transmittal. Approximately fifteen persons attended. Of those that spoke, all expressed support. A NIM summary, prepared by the petition agent, is located behind the CCPC Transmittal staff report. ADOPTION HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -2 to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt. However, should the CCPC recommend adoption and transmittal to DCA, staff recommends the following text revisions for clarity, to be concise, for proper code language, and for ease of implementation. Also, see staff notes below. [single underline denotes added text, as approved for Transmittal by BCC; double underline /deoW9 -s#i ea44 a denotes staff recommended changes] [new final bullet] • The following are additional restrictions and standards feF apply to tke- de�slesrpeai of Tract 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, within the southwest Quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Centers: a. Commercial OR .. 2. medical offices and clinics and Professional offices, except survevors: and. 3. medical related uses, such as a wellness 9F PWoeffieal ihsFask, center_ *** • - • • 1 -1 _ _ _ • • 1 • ••-1� • •, .•1111_ _ medical related uses - Lan *0*" 2. Arad: parking for the entire proiec d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. Staff Notes: * "Campus setting" is undefined in GMP & LDC; as such, implementation may be difficult. Phrase should be deleted unless can be described/defined in this amendment. Also, this property remains subject to all other Neighborhood Center requirements and restrictions, including use intensity ( "similar to C -1, C -2 or C -3 "). ** Urgent care center use is included within medical offices and clinics use category. * ** Physical therapist use is included within medical offices and clinics use category. "Medical related uses" is a broad/vague term but would presumably include uses such as apothecary, and eyeglass center in addition to a wellness center. "Wellness center" itself is an undefined term in GMP & LDC. Staff believes it consists of multiple uses - physical fitness facility, physical therapy, and dietician services. Physical therapists & dieticians are included under medical offices and clinics (SIC 8049). Question is whether applicant intends physical fitness facility as stand -alone use (allowed in C -3) or as use integrated with other principal uses as understood by staff (allowed in C -1 & 2). Staff does not consider a physical fitness facility itself to be a medical related use. It may be appropriate and wise to further identify /list medical related uses or more clearly define in scope. * * ** Wordsmithing for code language and clarity. LDC Section 4.05.04G., Table 17, contains these parking requirements: medical/dental office or clinic (outpatient care facility): 1 per 200 square feet; recreation facilities (indoor) ... or health club ...: 1 per 100 square feet. Wellness center is not a defined term in LDC; parking may be required as for a health club or possible as determined by the Director of Zoning and Land Development Review. * * * ** Wordsmithing for code language. * * * * ** Policy 5.1.1 contains lighting requirements — which conflict with the petitioner's proposed text. PROPOSED AMENDMENT B. PETITION CP- 2005 -6 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP /FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3± acres. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not to transmit to DCA. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Transmit to DCA (vote: 7/0) subject to two stipulations: (1) petitioner to submit to staff, for review prior to adoption hearings, a needs analysis pertaining to expansion of the David Lawrence Center uses; and, (2) petitioner to submit a conceptual site plan for review and consideration at adoption hearings. Two persons spoke. One stated no objection to water management and preserve area on the added easterly five acres, and no objection to expansion of David Lawrence Center but only to account for development lost to road widening; the other person stated objection to expansion of David Lawrence Center only. Subsequent to the CCPC hearing, the petitioner revised the petition to limit uses to the existing uses and those related to existing uses, thus removed some of the proposed uses (libraries, government offices, civic and cultural facilities, and medical offices associated with group care facilities). The issue of expanded list of uses was raised by staff and discussed by CCPC, but staff does not believe the CCPC motion included elimination of these other uses. BCC ACTION: Transmit as revised subsequent to CCPC hearing and subject to CCPC's two stipulations (vote: 5/0). ADOPTION HEARING The required needs analysis has been submitted, reviewed by staff, and determined to adequately demonstrate a need for uses provided by the David Lawrence Center (DLC); it is located in the petition package. The required conceptual build -out site plan has also been submitted; it is located immediately in front of the petition package. There is some disagreement or misunderstanding between staff and the petitioner as to whether the BCC, at their Transmittal hearing, intended to include the use: "medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center." However, neither staff's notes nor the meeting minutes reflect the BCC's motion to include this use. Staff has no objection to this use as staff views "associated with" to mean it is an integral part of the overall DLC function as a treatment center and that medical services would only be available for DLC patients /clients; conversely, such medical office use would not be open to the general public. An independent medical office use requires commercial zoning; this site does not qualify under the GGAMP for commercial zoning. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CP -2005-6 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt, subject to these limitations: limit the development and uses on Tract 66 to stormwater management and preservation areas; limit the development and uses on Tract 59 to church and church - operated private school and /or day care; and, limit the development and uses on Tracts 43 and 50 to the existing David Lawrence Center use and to the amount of building expansion that could have occurred on those two tracts had 2.2 acres not been conveyed for right -of -way. Additionally, staff has no objection to the addition of use "g." as identified below. [single underline denotes added text, as approved for Transmittal by BCC; double underline /dewile- strike44e denotes staff recommended changes] 8. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of 1 -75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses, and the development and redevelopment of a. b. C. d. e. f. wrnrnurmv L nurcn or U0C. jCzt-jjK- Eno (4A PROPOSED AMENDMENT C. PETITION CP- 2005 -9 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 70,000 square feet of lower order retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8t acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not to transmit to DCA. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Not to transmit to DCA (vote: 7/2). One person spoke, in opposition, stating concern for impact upon tranquility of the neighborhood and wildlife in the area, and questioning the petitioner's report as to the amount of opposition by the Big Corkscrew Island Civic Association (believes there was more opposition than reported). BCC ACTION: Transmit to DCA, per staffs recommended alternative text (vote: 4/0). ADOPTION HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -9 to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt. PROPOSED AMENDMENT D. PETITION CP- 2005 -13 ,Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use - Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non - church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, offering 150 of up to 296 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69t acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DCA, with text revisions as noted in the Transmittal staff report. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Transmit to DCA, as recommended by staff, and with one added requirement to phase development as stated in item "I." of the Resolution Exhibit "A" (vote: 8/1). BCC ACTION: Transmit to DCA, per CCPC recommendation (vote: 4/0). ADOPTION HEARING Just prior to adoption hearings, the petitioner has requested additional text changes, generally explained as: (1) clarification with respect to the actual number and interim use of manufactured housing units — not travel trailers — to remain on site, and to shorten their interim use period; (2) reduction in the number of dwelling units for people involved in providing essential services from 150 to 147, based on the design and construction of a whole number of units equally divided among a whole number of buildings — instead of the convenient round number of 150 (there is no reduction in the total number of dwelling units, but 3 more units than previously may be made available for any occupant and not reserved for Essential Services people); (3) attempt at clarification exclusion from floor area calculation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2005 -13 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt as transmitted, except as now modified by the petitioner but edited by staff (modified text is shown below), and transmit to DCA. The text as Transmitted is all new and would ordinarily be underlined. However, for ease in depicting the latest revisions proposed, only the petitioner's new revisions are shown in single underline /stAw 4hru format, and staffs proposed edits to it are shown in double underline /double @40ke thm format. c. The maximum floor area for institutional and other non - residential uses-, shall not exceed 368,000 square feet. e. A requirement shall be put in place at the time of rezoning/P1JD amendment that all but too ( 0) uwvel tmil ._., nine (9) mobile home units currently on site shall be removed from the subject property prior to the construction of any housing not reserved for church - related employees, staff and program participants. The w% nine remaining 4evel tFeilers mobile home units may serve as temnorary adult care units for program participants, and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent residential structures, permanent adult care units, or within five (5) years twenty -four (24) months from the date of adoption of this Subdistrict, whichever is sooner. f. One hundred €iffy forty -seven of the 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defined in the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan. g- 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 430 147 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty -five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 130 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10 church - related dwelling units. Phase Two development will consist of the remaining 446 149 market rate units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 446 149 market rate dwelling units in Phase Two, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete. PROPOSED AMENDMENT E. PETITION CPSP - 2005 -14 Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and North Belle Meade Overlay Map, part of the Future Land Use Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 20 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 13 and 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Consisting of +283 acres total. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] TRANSMITTAL HEARING At Transmittal hearings there were 90 properties under consideration. The BCC approved twenty parcels for transmittal to DCA. The spreadsheet located behind the EAC Adoption staff report identifies all recommendations to date for those twenty parcels. On November 13, 2007, the property owner's agent for map parcels 3 -10 notified the County that this property was withdrawn. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DCA a total of 17 parcels (map parcels 1, 2 [portion], 36 -41, 43, 56, 61, 70, 79, 91 [portion], 92 [portion], 95, 96). EAC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Transmit, as recommended by staff. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Transmit to DCA a total of 12 parcels (map parcels 1, 2 [portion], 36 -41, 91 [portion], 92 [portion], 95, 96) and specifically not to include the five parcels [43, 56, 61, 70, 79] listed at that time as represented by Don Lester /15,000 Coalition; vote: 4/3. BCC ACTION: Transmit to DCA a total of 20 parcels (map parcels 1, 2 [portion], 36 -41, 91 [portion], 92 [portion], 95, 96 by vote of 3/1; and parcels 3 -10). DCA ORC Report Objection: Parcels #3 to #10: This Objection is not listed as it is no longer relevant - these parcels were withdrawn. Parcels 36 -41, 95 and 96: "The County is proposing to re- designate these parcels from Sending Land designation to Receiving Land designation. According to the information provided, the northern 42.69 -acres of the subject site are developed, and the southern 10.37 - acres are undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands. While the northern 42.69 -acres that is already developed, may not support wildlife, the southern portion of the property is still undeveloped and has intact native vegetation which has the potential to support wildlife. The southern portion of the property has the same characteristics as the properties on the west, east and south of the site that are also designated Sending Lands. Although, endangered species were not found on the site, according to the information provided, these species have the potential to locate on the site. Florida panthers and Black bear telemetry information provided show that these mammals have been located in the vicinity of the site. hi light of this information, the designation of this property as Sending Lands especially in the case of the southern portion was appropriate. No information has been provided to refute the Sending Land designation in the case of the southern portion of the site." r *r ► *s esa * *t �s* ♦t* r *s *s* s *• * *s "Recommendation: The Department recommends ... With respect to Parcels 36 -41, and 95 to 96 the Department recommends that the southern portion of the subject site be retained in Sending Land designation." Staff Response to Objection: Map Parcels 36 -41, 95, 96 Staff's review of the ORC Report yields that DCA mistakenly included two parcels (97 and 98) that were requested for re- designation along with parcels 36 -41, 95 and 96, but that were not approved for Transmittal. Therefore, rather than 10+ acres of land that is "undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands," there are +3.7 acres of vegetated land. On a lesser point, agency jurisdictional wetland determinations have not been made; rather, the data submitted by the property owner's environmental consultant identified potential jurisdictional wetland delineations (for +_3.49 acres of the ±3.7 acres). In considering whether to maintain the Transmittal recommendation to re- designate the entire property to Neutral Lands, or to acquiesce to DCA's recommendation to leave the vegetated [southeasterly +3.7 acres] portion of the site (portion of parcel 96) as Sending Lands, staff notes the following points. 9 Re- designate Entire Site as Neutral: + The +3.7 acres that contain [native] vegetation represent 37% of the +10 -acre parcel 96, or 8% of the +45 -acre site (all 8 parcels combined). In 2002, one general guideline applied to determine property designation was the percentage of native vegetation present. Sending Lands had a threshold of >80% and Receiving Lands had a 15% threshold. + If the site was re- designated as Neutral Lands, it would be subject to Policy 6.1.2b. in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which states "A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area, shall be preserved." Therefore, if non - agricultural development was proposed, 2.22 acres (60 %) of the +3.7 acres would have to be preserved, and 1.48 acres (40 %) could be cleared — unless prohibited by state or federal agency requirements. This 1.48 acres might be viewed as de minimis. Re- designate All But +3.7 Acres as Neutral: In the original designation of Sending/Receiving/Neutral Lands, the County originally, and generally thereafter, did not consider property lines, rather followed habitat boundaries. DCA is recommending just that — follow habitat boundaries rather than property boundaries. As part of this very petition, the County has recommended and approved at Transmittal, following habitat boundaries rather than property boundaries such that portions of a property contain different designations (map parcels 2, 91, 92). Adjacent lands to the south and east are designated Sending Lands and appear to have same or similar habitat characteristics. If the County does not follow DCA's recommended action, there is the risk of a non - compliance determination by DCA. ADOPTION HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -14 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt the re- designation of 12 parcels (map parcels 1, 2 [portion], 36 -41, 91 [portion], 92 [portion], 95, 96 [portion - exclude the southeasterly +3.7 acres per DCA's recommendation]), and transmit to DCA. EAC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Approve for adoption, as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA. PROPOSED AMENDMENT F. PETITION CPSP - 2005 -15 Petition requesting an amendment to the Transportation Element (TE), to add new Policies 3.5 and 3.6, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. [Coordinator: Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Planning Director] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DCA. 10 CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Not to transmit to DCA (vote: 6/0). BCC ACTION: Transmit (vote 3/1). DCA ORC Report Objection: "This policy [3.6] does not establish meaningful and predictable standards to guide the selection and acquisition of future transportation corridors in environmentally sensitive areas. It does not ensure the protection of natural resources which is inconsistent with the state requirement to appropriately plan for the location of land uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat." DCA followed these statements with a Recommendation to, "Revise Policy 3.6 to establish meaningful predictable guidelines and standards to be implemented during the acquisition of the right -of -way, and ensuring that the standards for the protection of natural resources are not compromised in the process of right -of -way acquisition." Please see the ORC Report (cover letter and pages 2 and 3). Staff Response to Objection: Comprehensive Planning and Transportation Planning staffs have considered the DCA's Objection and Recommendation and revised Policy 3.6 to clarify that the language applies only to the expansion of existing facilities. Currently, when a transportation entity expands existing facilities they are at times making the remaining land nonconforming. The issue can have ramifications to the property owner and can increase the cost and hardship to both the property owner and the entity expanding the facility. Revisions have also been made to Policy 3.5 and 3.6 to provide additional language assuring the new provisions are consistent with the State requirement to appropriately plan for the location of land uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat. Together these clarifications should alleviate the concerns of DCA as they are written to eliminate the possibility that existing and future facilities will not adequately address the concerns addressed in the ORC Report. Staff revisions are depicted below in double underlone/oWke4kw format. Policy 3.5 Within one year of the effective date of this amendment the County shall prepare and adopt a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan: and 2. adopt Corridor Preservation Maps Corridor Preservation Tables Critical Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables: and 3. limit the uses of land within the required corridor, ammpl iately plan far th location of land uses and di= incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources: and 4. provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables: an d 11 5. provide for an approval process by the Board of County Commissioners for new or expanded corridors and intersections• and 6. provide a process for advanced reservation donation dedication or any other means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas. For the purposes of this Policy protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway: or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established: or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies: or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to proposed grade separated intersections. All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02 of the Florida Statues Policy 3.6 In the event of any We of right -of -way acquisition or reservation for all purposes included in the expansion_ of existing &P 4he osmWa@tisa oftranWortation facilities by any federal, state, or local transportation department authority or agency, the requirements for buffering native vegetation retention preserve setback and open svace and/or any other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right -of -way acquisition or reservation may be reduced. modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or protection activities in accordance with standards established fnr the nrntP,tinn of mcomnaupte Lana uses away trom environmentally s_ emitive resources such reductions, modifications or eliminations shall be wAdcd by these standards as well as the priorities &A forth in the Consmmtion and Coastal A4anaoement Element and the Capital lm=yement Element for right-of-way acquisition nd brough_t to afire the Board of County Commissioners for consideration nd annrova Any modifications or reductions that conflict with any other requirements of the Growth Management Plan must be brought to the Board of County Commissioners for intgMretation and approval ADOPTION HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -15 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt as Transmitted, but revised in response to DCA's Objection, and to transmit to DCA. EAC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Approve for adoption, as recommended by staff, and transmit to DCA. 12 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT G. PETITION CPSP- 2005 -16 Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map series map titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Welffields and ASRs Map. [Coordinator. David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable — not heard at Transmittal hearings. EAC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Not applicable — not heard at Transmittal hearing. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Not applicable — not heard at Transmittal hearing. BCC ACTION: Not applicable — not heard at Transmittal hearing. ADOPTION HEARING Both the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element require the County to maintain maps of potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from nearby development activities and other activities and conditions. Every two years, the County is to revise and update its three - dimensional computer models, based upon a variety of data, and revise wellfield maps, as necessary. These maps consist of a single map known as the Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map that is part of the GMP's Future Land Use Map series. Section 3.06.00 of the Land Development Code (LDC) contains "wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone maps," maps that are similar to, but with greater detail than, the map in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Similar to the GMP, the LDC section requires review of the wellfield maps, but on an annual basis. The biennial process in the GMP consists of updating the computer model, then, if warranted, revising the map in the Future Land Use Element. Subsequently, any affected map(s) in the LDC would need to be amended. Since the LDC includes regulatory provisions, it is important to amend the LDC map(s) as soon as possible after the GMP map has been amended. The EAC staff report, the existing Wellfields map from the FLUE, and a 29 -page report that provides the technical basis for the proposed map amendment, are all located behind the CCPC Transmittal staff report. The proposed Wellfields map itself is located on page 5 of that report and the summary of map changes (affected wellfields) is identified on page 14. There is one new wellfield (Ave Maria) and there are a few existing wellfields that are modified. Due to constraints caused by the tremendous amount of staff time and effort needed for the EAR (Evaluation and Appraisal Report)-based GMP amendments, the most recent modeling update was not completed in time for the proposed model -based amendment to the FLUE map to be included for the Transmittal hearings on the 2005 cycle of GMP amendments (held February-July, 2007). Therefore, staff requested, and received, 13 approval from the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to add this petition to the 2005 cycle of GMP amendment at the Adoption hearings. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issued their Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on October 8, 2007. Since this petition was not heard at Transmittal hearings, it was not sent to DCA for review so it is not (could not be) included in the ORC Report. Though there is always some level of risk in adopting an amendment without benefit of DCA's preliminary review after Transmittal hearings, staff does not believe the risk of a noncompliance finding to be significant given that the amendment is technical in nature — it is based upon the sound science of the computer modeling, which has previously been used to support such map amendments — and because such an amendment has no impact upon public infrastructure or surrounding properties (though properties newly added to a protection zone would be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CPSP- 2005 -16 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt, and transmit to DCA. EAC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: The EAC heard this petition on November 7, 2007, and unanimously recommended to adopt, and transmit to DCA. The EAC also recommended that the CCPC consider further protection for the first two wellfield protection zones closest to the wellheads from possible contamination from excavations. Subsequent to the EAC meeting, staff of the Pollution Control and Prevention, Engineering Services, and Comprehensive Planning Departments discussed this concern and are not aware of any excavations in wellfield protection zones that have negatively affected water quality for any municipal wells. PROPOSED AMENDMENT H. PETITION CP- 2006 -4 Petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria provision, to allow a church as a special exception to locational criteria, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and ±300' east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 2.6± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] TRANSMITTAL HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DCA, with text revisions as noted in the Transmittal staff report and now reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A. CCPC RECOMMENDATION and COMMENTS: Transmit to DCA, as recommended by staff (vote: 8/0). BCC ACTION: Transmit to DCA per CCPC (vote 5/0). ADOPTION HEARING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward petition CP- 2006 -4 to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt as Transmitted, and to transmit to DCA. 14 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward the 2005 cycle GMP amendments (petitions CP- 2005 -13, CPSP- 2005 -14, CPSP- 2005 -15, CPSP- 2005 -16, and CP- 2006 -4) to the BCC with a recommendation to adopt - with modifications since Transmittal hearings, as noted in this Staff Report - and to transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, except for petitions CP- 2005 -2, CP- 2005 -6, CP- 2005 -9. Prepared By: ` �` Date: �� e "7 David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: �� �� Date: / 46—c Randall Cohen, A1613, Director Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: �pn, c / / Dale: l l —!L --o'- Marjori tudent- Stirling, Assistant County Attorney County Attorney Office Approved By: ; � �'� ray Date: 1114 1d17 Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator' Community Development and Environmental Services Division COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MR. MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN 2005 cycle GMP amendments - Adoption (petitions CP- 2005 -2, 6, 9,13; CPSP - 2005 -14, 15, 16; and CP- 2006 -4). Staff Report for November 26, 2007 CCPC hearing. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the December 4, 2007 BCC hearing. CCPC Staff Report Adoption 2005 cycle G: Comprehensi*Conq Planning GIVP DATAIComp Plan Amendments12005 petitions dw/11 -16 -07 15 DATE U101 FROM: e-a- Co-ti-vi.yty November 27, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Marcia R. Kendall /Senior Planner RE: BCC Advertisement Affidavit for 2005 GMPA's Cycle - Adoption Please be advised that due to the timeframe, copy of the advertisement affidavit is not available at this time. As soon as received, a copy of the affidavit will be placed in the notebooks prior to submittal to DCA. Thank you. NOTICE OF INTENT TO ,. December 0,=7 In the Boarmom, 31 F e purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation on adoption amendments to the FUturs I Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map Series a Ordinance (.line ale ae follows'. ORDINANCE NO 01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 0905, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNP UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT AND GOLDEN DATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE W1D USE MAP AND MAP SERIES. PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE. Government In (Bldg ticattion at the following County Orphans, 2000A3301 Element and Future Land Usy Map and Map Series. :NT PIN FOR THE + AREA MASTER PLAN 1 PROVIDING FOR AN I ORDINANCE NO O)- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 8905, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROVRH MANAGEMENT PUN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED APEA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE GOLDEN DATE AREA MASTER PUN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER TIN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERAROUTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. D CA area 8, Ptlltlon tpuealing an amendment to the Golden Gate Me Meister Pen Ii ard Swiss Got. Ares hmater Plan end Mao Pelee to comma. 'Golden Gate Porkwey Ina111NIOneI Subdl.Al to albw lor the eal.lebe and continued oprtallon otters David Lawrence Center and the Chumh of God, and, to allow adeBimel Ireatud -fil and nested vass, for prop at located on the nom aide of Golden Gets Parleasy, speCllkally Traces 43, 50, 59, aM 50. Unit 30, Golden Gale Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South Range 26 East conelellnq of IS 31 acres, ORDINANCE NO 07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO B9 -0i AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GRONRH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPOMTEO AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FIC TURD LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVEMBRPY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, > CP- 2JJ5 -9. Palbpn rams6eling an emendmenl 1p the up $p}ICy to Staab 11. Di MYrew Island Nw,lborodure Commercial Super,"Iicn nor popaM de.11.1. on lM I.Vor or. Us. Map as Pura For, Mlaed Da. Gellert, Neutral Uarc , in.plow up to C..F re peel of lower order recall, oMo. and penorug a... ueee for propeM located at the northwest comer of Immokelee Road and Pled Road, In Section 27. Township a) South. Range P East, condoling of ee acres. ]Uaorineton Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] ORDINANCE NO OI_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILIN AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTNE DATE. ➢ CP- 2005 -13, Petlllon Ipuesing en amendmml to the F M1 at Lend Use EJwml IF EI end Elam ad Use Mao IFLUM sad Man Same to create the "Ootller Soulever Commum, Fedllry Suddl o[pr or propeM designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use Deldct Urban Residential Fringe Suedogicl, to allow up to 365,903 souero feel of church sponsored mt hr ion ll and resldenllel ueee, and allow non -church Beard'... le.Jeca lel sheal Casement, unXS per a.m. othering 150 51 up to 296 affordable woMOrce and marine rate housing units to persons In relvW in pmNtltng eaeeregal saMCes Ie Collier C oust, for Property )meted on the east Side of Cutler Blvd Go 511. One -half mile norm of Rebleaneke- Hammock Read (Atha the First easnmMV or Oren Pl In .11.1 In.wn 1 n.r...a an c...e ..,.. r. ..r trader: Cory SchmlM, Principal Planner) ORDINANCE NO. 07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 09 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROW` N MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENTS FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVEMBILRY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, to he 21 East, an' Section 3, Townahlp 40 6r 27 East consisting of 1263 seem total. ORDINANCE NO 07. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 09L5, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ME UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN WENOMEM TO THE TMNSPO WATION ELEMENT PROVIDING FOR SEVERIBILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • ZPSE-etl PIrgen moussIng an dmNa11M oidesse Deal MI add new P011cMS 3.5andafi.'orating Tamisallare Corridor Protection Peens (TSEN) Immicoratlon Ever Preeemtlan Maps FEW.) and a .... I .able. and Teak encea to Prwlds par Ina PrWeelbn end -shi Lion p1 eel.0n, and torture irarvportllon coMAm.. ICoerdampar. Nick'Ceselengulds, TmsperlaMon Planning Olnebrl ORDINANCE NO 200E AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 00 -05 AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROvV H MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENTS FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES FOR THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELOSAND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASPS) MAP, OF THE GROINH MANAGEMENT PUN, PROVIDING FOR SEVEMBILIIY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (it) • CPSP2C - tO,Petlllonrepumtinganamen enttolM Vilkii ftgg1Igh Ames Prepared voluffelas and ADS. pall. (COONlnatoc David Wwb, AIDE, GMP Plennlnp kharea cl ORDINANCE NO III AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 09 -05 AS WENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COWER COUNTY FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE GOLDEN DATE AREA MASTER PUN, PROVIDING FOR SEVEPABILITV AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, CP�II00i Peters laquwifin, an emendmenl to the Bird - IRCSMp, to readily the Correctional Uses Shaggily, i'p sir el Elrceptlo m io Cade l-re Use Locatlonel CHI proNslon, to allow a church as a special expeenon m Ixetlwel Smell, for property located on the SeT, aid f Immokelee Road and 2300 east of Oakes Boulevard, In $action 29, Township 4e South Range 26 Eael, ors all, or 20z me. [c ac aerWeatan Corot' BmmlM, 111 .1 Planner] blemished pallor ale invited to appear and be heard plea of ins proposed Growth Management Plan Re ores to ere aDillabler far Inappepd.R al the Geller 4' any, Clerk's Ol " floor, AtlminlsFation Bottom,, Iller County Government Cent East Naples, FlOrda', ] at Com rehenalVe Planning Department 2800 N. seshoe 8lv Naples Florida betweee the hours of 800 A, and 5'.00 PM.. Monday tnreu0h Fdtlay. Any pueetlone talning to these documents should be �1mcted to the mprehenslve Planning Department (238 - 252 - 2400). ,"an comments filed with the Clerk to the Board. Office or to Sepember4, 2007, will be read and considered at pool, head" person decbm to appeal any decision made by the and of County Commissioners with residual to any matter laid red at such meeting or nded, he will need a record that proceeding, and for such purpose he may neetl to ure that a verbatim record of the proceedings 0 made, ch more Includes the Na0mony and evidence upon Ich the appeal Is to be bassi. iBAD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ILLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VIES CDLETfA, CHAIRMAN nGHT E BROCK, CLERK /e /Patnda L Morgan Deputy ClaM 19 e-r Co-ri-rz�y DATE: November 16, 2007 TO: Collier County Planning Commission FROM: Marcia R. Kendall /Senior Planner RE: CCPC Advertisement Affidavit for 2005 Adoption Cycle for GMPA's Please be advised that due to the timeframe, copy of the advertisement affidavit is not available at this time. As soon as received, a copy of the affidavit will be placed in the notebooks prior to the December 4, 2007 BCC Hearing. Thank you. Comprehensive Planning Department NOTION OF PUBLIC NKAIMB1 k Votk. m hlnbypvn that a Pogo hwlnp b b hem by M Callm County Pmnnhp Comm lon on lhwsd • Nowlbr 14 90p/ d 9:90 AM b tti B of .'.oudy Commlrbwm MMlnp Ibmn, 9" FbPO W Hembn Tsnar EulEllnp IGMo-,E), Comlty.GwNrynnf CeNr 9901 Ed TambrM TaE. N.plr, FktM. ft NPOaa a 9m hNPbp mba.mmmarwcmlrgetbn on,APaptbn e..dn ttat Fdm. LmtdU 9PtAmJ and FM I t Mp r0 Mn SwIM Gb OoMn G.m Ama11 Nn rdt9dd.A OetP Prr Mr PI.A Faum LrtllN. Map 9alw.end ft Tmmpabtlan ElarnW oftN G1ewlh MNmpmw!t PNn. We gldmnwiXM rerblbwe: , OECMN9DENO.Ok -_ AN. OPgNANCE AMENgNO Ut OOW" - aSABAMENoETl.1HE'COIJAT COMFY GPOWDI NANMEIAENf PL41 Fdi WE IMINWRPOPATEO MFACF'CCLLHiCo11My, EGMD yGATE NG soPMNAEIaaBrtro TIE ODLLENt11GE APFA ALMIEP 0./J! AIO GOLDEN GATF MFA MA9 BEPIE9, MAP MC M RAN FUTUPE, IMA lBE MM MEfFECM UTEUG PoP BEYEPABMY PfC PPCV IOIND fOfl OVE MtE > CI -IDYH, Rtltlonmgwmq en unw,dnMb Ny�p{y� 'l1�mHOiGIMeeH •'° - - Ge - ti ft �Clm,WEEEISIpr mmmmd•Wrwl m�ImeWiWan WAxN N9pmwlm9P CwPar, bElo. divaVnrdwlnabP uw mq pnlwbwl aEO:.uv, b paP.b IaPNaO N 0m 9oMNlP9a1 omrramdMtnGw eoMaumJ nk YGe.reWv!{{m8emb19, Tdwhlp' w EaM; P.l9a n Ew, aa.bmb a Ts aonn tCwar4: Tbn ' OwiPw4A1C9{PramW Rww1 -I' -M C!a]nMC£MENgNG.pUNANCE .N0. r- . r; M AMEIIDEq TiE COIIBI MR l9POl'TTtI' EtA11IaBAHT WAN WE Lka ' Mw� MWGFCWHCOUIT.LCI.DAGNRiOybING PoP M AI.BIgA41yro THEOOLpEN ELATE MFA ..,.1 1M919t1 MO OOIDEN GATE A(fA'.C18 P�PgJID119mroPBEYHiA&L11YAN0 WpNgNaO ®fOP MBFEDiNF GATE � > �CP -rE60. Pwbn mm�Gq nunmgmYn m iM➢GOn1i�BGa :l' ]Ey,tiarb'um`GOlamlmvmkwq '• Yu�d9WmmNar.mMewbtlmmmm.lin mtl WdmimP Opwalbn aam DaMlmvANcaC.Mrnatlm CMrhd Ge4 mia;m Nbw ammMmYmtlmtlarmlmtl labr uaa4bwpmb brwntlm norm '�'. dsdtm.Gam PmAwy. aprmwb.9lobw, aP, 64 n.aa, Ud1. 90, GaYMMENIn.G 1M W.TwnIPN 9uAlt'PnWREErI. oes4mb d 14M eew, IDPmrrw•. rdmb amaw, AGq MmmN ORMAACE M CPDINMCE AMENOWG CPdNANCE NC. E9- o9. M MfrNDm. THE COWED COUNTY GPO.TM MANaGEAm}R RM MR THE UMNCOPRIP MEA OFWWENCWNIy,R WE PPDVIOINO .FGP M.MEHOAD ro THE :RRUE LANG 119E E1om MO'FUNPE LANG UEE MM AND' MM 9ENE8. RgtDING FUL'9EVEARm1)ly - . PPOYDIm9FOP NlERECTNEMIC ' > OF- rOH.PNMbn nquamYgnnunb11M1101N FlU�e I�ntlW bmM .le'OJllmfa. M.k N/pibwlvotl 9aMMiloPbPnmmb argmbe r pm Pma. L4N 1M Np r RM Elx9a AE.a Ur ga0bl, II.w11N b bplbpailylapWaElMnm.wN2Pnlma mYnadM Y16Rr Hold: m BSibn V. Tom* 07 9aM, Ri 9TESt oo— hn9MEiwlw - p:oall`rwo0.,wvav d FrPmbN pm--d OTICINANCE NO.In -_ M OPDHANCE AMENpNG' ORDINANCE No. 6& M is I�' *rte . onolwlacE NO. oT -_� IN o10YNNCE N.BwYIG.OPgNOHCE No. w OM1. A8 MBIO ®. 111E CO11H111d11NtV liPO1VIN MANILeEMENf M.YI FCP TIE UMNWPPOMiH1 APElacoust CdlMY, FIDRgAGY PPDMwNG ECP.M AMBAM4IT lb THE WNPE LWD la9E EIEIAENiGFUIUPEIANDUBEWPNAIMP9B ®: PMObdNO yCP BEIEPAGP.RV'AND'PPOYIOING fOR - MEFRCTNEOATE ') CIYSWa -14 Pallmn .nmrlMiOaiwYrMb1M8YWffiYYIYp y0rbn4alOMla RIgiN.bPWa batl.n N.mN1mPYmPNaIMbtNMAbNl.pop.11� bdrP«tPneadm.a9, ' 1PnN9PeT E.an,P.m(eT PS1,mal tlambr41.+M4wmMPan9a JT Ewl, mq 9adlwm w ne ri TPw.lyp w 9oMh:'Pmma n Fit nJ awtlna la na n: lewwbatewRT.w Pr BaE duuN9lm a>;m9 Pxw mu. P:a9nmmme Da+N PTPaI; reP olr PYamm abawn] anpr9uA:E NO: n -_ M lmE9NMCE AME COWER ORINPI&E NC. E0. O4 AE AMENOEC: WE RCOUNTY GPOWIH avNA09FNT PLAN NT THE InINC+mWMTE9 MPA'OFCALLIEP CCUNN WE, @(.PP TON PoP M AAP tl TO TE.TPAMPOPDGmk9 . E1FaB1T. PPDJI[ING IOP E191AdMry Mb - PPaIIDNGFdi MFFFI�RJEDME.' > .WOdEPE % Amlam ln mlimn4 1 btlm Bmd®:m.tlanw PdeW aa,lmaa, bOOtlueM'Thee Cnbm Romoan Ptw (ICPV\A.AnptimlMl CPnlb PIrN w Mp (TDP W. w0 wwYatl YENP P1Y ualwv, b peme b 1hs - mpboaon mNa9wWn a.ram oammmwRwtiumm�ba.... ' IOaolarmn MalCrNrd4RmmroN +lon PlmElEla tMPdx] . OPOOMNCE N0. NM -_ M. CPDIIN AMBAWG OPgNMOE W. NI- M M AMEIIDEq THE COMIEP CgaTT GPDWIN MANMEa@lt RAN. MA WE'UNNWPPpW® MR:CPCpNENDdRm FI:ORM GY.yp.1gN0' fOk'M"AMENDMEMDM RITUPEVND UEE, 'gFLkN18NTMEtMC1reEMw,wt.NPEEIEE FDPIHEM F]1HEMPIg1EC11DNNFAG,PP8P09E0 ViBIPIF3 ➢BM10IG11E9181C1NAEAtD1EWVEM' lAlIWJAAP,KIIF GGOWTHMMI[laff PLAN. PPOMOINO FCP BEU®NGnTY MD PIpVIDIlA3 PoP - MEFl4CME DAlE.N9 ' wTFrest4 PalPbPigrmmn mlwNwdmllwaa��.r 1%�EOErPA�lY1l p.wllmn GAawmb.AICR WO'" PM1nmMMnMrI DPDUYNCEND. DT -_ �: M O NANOE'AMEND.b OPgNANCE NO. M . M, M AAbb&., TIE OOLLBI CWNiT O%IWIH . MMMIEEBIf PLAN MR THE Lwvc CPATEO PIEAOf CIX1H1 CWN1L' R MPP om FMP'M AMGJDM@]F, M THE GOLDEN G AAFA .. MMTEN PUN, PROJGfq FLIP BCAhTAeam AEn ' PitlT9gtw RM MlFEf:11JE DATE > A-rOPA;PNEbmmrtN9 n:wrWlwnm Dm'➢OtlrIW/GL m0wifto EiGM96 to m m9P9y tl. Ca W Ibwl ltw B W Ntbb4SpwYBllftns m ConwlamllYA "wow xbmdmn mday•o. wY 'aPwM nmgloamlpoationalPmarY, bplgwry'boaYP rmawan Nr d bbml.ba Poaa nP asps r a CLAW m1bwq m a.abn r. awws wmah Pmm>r t3.A mmrYgaP2a amr pa.srm: O.rar.9l.alat Flmabal Plwlall' .. AE mON.W,Pm mr.bPlNd to rrm'm WI1aa1G CoPM ol" M.k P,Ab*% Cleirwn ;' CubT OO1.Oy Rmmm9CommlWnn 1 I; a.na PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTIC NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, November 15, 2007 at 8:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, W. Harmon.Turner Building (Bldg. F), County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation on Adoption amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Se- ries of the Growth Management Plan. The Ordinance title is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2007- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UN- INCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR: AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FU- TURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES FOR THE WELLHEAD PRO- TECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR'S) MAP, OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Y CPSP- 2005 -16, Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Map series map. titled Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Cop- ies of the proposed amendment are avail- able for inspection at the Comprehensive Plan- ning Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Com- prehensive Planning Section. (239 -403- 2400). Written comments filed with the Comprehensive Planning Section prior to November 15, 2007, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Com- mission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of th d' COLLIER COUMY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS MD ASR. l� i I_�1 URpFt° l I L° IIIR�, Ois a t pro0ee Ing, proposed Future Land Use map in the Growth Management Plan and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which re- cord includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No 99005433 __ A� STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" THOMAS G. PELHAM CHARLIE CRIST Governor Secretary October 8, 2007 The Honorable James Coletta Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3.301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Coletta: The Department has completed the review of the proposed amendment to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan (DCA No. 07 -2), which was received on August 7, 2007. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (FS), we have prepared the attached report that outlines our findings concerning the amendment. It is important that the County address the issues set forth in our review report so that they can be resolved prior to adoption. Within the next 60 days, the County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed Amendment (DCA No. 07 -2) involves several changes to the comprehensive plan. The Department is concerned about Amendment CPSP- 2005 -14 involving changes to the Sending Lands desigriation of the adopted Future Land Use Map as well as the changes to the Transportation Element. The Department is committed to working closely with the County in responding to our Report. We will continue our collaborative efforts to ensure that the final product is one that can serve the best interest of the County while addressing the requirements of State Law. Please, feel free to call Bernard O. Piawah at 850- 922 -1810, if you have any questions. Yours 'ncerely, Mike McDaniel Chief, Comprehensive Planning MM/bp Enclosures: Review Agency Comments cc: Mr. David Crawford, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Mr. Randy Cohen, Collier County Planning Department. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 -2100 Phone: 8 5 0 - 4 88- 8 4 661SUNCOM 278 -8466 Fax 850- 921 - 0781 /SUNCOM 291 -0781 Website: www.dca.state.fl.us COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE oe..n. F INCA COMM DEVELOPMENT OdX6- 23561SUNCOM 2]6.2356 Phone. 305289 -2402 8UNCOM2]6 Far 8S0- 922.5623ISUNCOM292 -5623 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, Collier County has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine not to adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan is outlined in Section 1633184, F.S., and Rule 9J- 11.011, F.A.C. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, Collier County must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the plan, and pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted plan directly to the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. Please, be advised that the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted amendment. As discussed in our letter sent to you on May 25, 2001, outlining the changes to Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., which were effective July 1, 2001, and providing a model sign -in information sheet, please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted plan for compliance review. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR COLLIER COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 07 -2 October 8, 2007 Division of Community Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, F.A.C. INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the Collier County proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163. Part 11, F.S. The objections include a recommendation of an approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. The County should address each of these objections when the plan is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections that are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items that the County considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement, justifying its non - applicability, pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non - applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is suffigient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments that follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non - compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: 07 -2 COLLIER COUNTY I. CONSISTENCY WITH RULE 9J -5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C), & CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.) Introduction: Collier County's proposed Amendment (DCA No. 07 -2) involves changes to the Future Land Use Map and the text of the Future Land Use and Transportation Elements. The Department has identified the following objections the amendments. OBJECTIONS 1. CPSP- 2005 -14: Change From Sending Lands to Receiving Lands and Neutral Lands Parcels #3 to #10: The County is proposing to re- designate some properties located in North Bellle Meade (Parcels 43 to #10 in the County's list) from Sending Lands to Neutral Lands. The amendment would allow encroachment of development into an area that provides habitat for a variety of wildlife, including the Florida Black Bear and Florida Panther. That encroachment would compromise the environmental integrity and values of the North Belle Meade (NBM) Sending lands. These lands have the same environmental attributes as the other NBM Sending lands; to approve a change from Sending Land designation to Neutral Land designation would jeopardize the preservation of this area as a wildlife habitat. Parcels 36 -41, 95 and 96: The County is proposing to re- designate these parcels from Sending Land designation to Receiving Land designation. According to the information provided, the northern 42.69 -acres of the subject site are developed, and the southern 10.37 -acres are undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands. While the northern 42.69 -acres that is already developed, may not support wildlife, the southern portion of the property is still undeveloped and has intact native vegetation which has the potential to support wildlife. The southern portion of the property has the same characteristics as the properties on the west, east and south of the site that are also designated Sending Lands. Although, endangered species were not found on the site, according to the information provided, these species have the potential to locate on the site. Florida panthers and Black bear telemetry information provided show that these mammals have been located in the vicinity of the site. In light of this information, the designation of this property as Sending Lands especially in the case of the southern portion was appropriate. No information has been provided to refute the Sending Land designation in the case of the southern portion of the site. [Chapter 163.3177(6)(a), & (d), & (8), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J- 5.005(2)(a), (c); 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., & (3)(c)6., and 9J- 5.013(2)(c)3., 5, & 6., Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C)]. Recommendation: The Department recommends that the Sending Lands designation for Parcels #3 to #10 be retained because that site is a part of the general area with native vegetation and has the potential to support wildlife which is consistent with the intent of the Sending Lands designation. With respect to Parcels 36 -41, and 95 to 96 the Department recommends that the southern portion of the subject site be retained in Sending Land designation. 2. CPSP- 2005 -15: Transportation Element: The County is proposing to add Policies 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8 to the Transportation Element in order to preserve future transportation corridors. Policy 3.6 states: "In the event of any type of right -of -way acquisition or reservation for all purposes included for the construction of transportation facilities by any federal, state, or local transportation department, authority, or agency the requirement for buffering, native vegetation retention, preserve, setback, and open space and/or any other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right -of -way acquisition or reservation may be reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or protection activities." This policy does not establish meaningful and predictable standards to guide the selection and acquisition of future transportation corridors in environmentally sensitive areas. It does not ensure the protection of natural resources which is inconsistent with the state requirement to appropriately plan for the location of uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat. [Chapter 163.3177(6)(a), (b), & (d), & (8), F.S.; Rule 9J- 5.005(6); 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., & (3)(c)6., and 9J- 5.013(2)(c) 6., F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise Policy 3.6 to establish meaningful predictable guidelines and standards to be implemented during the acquisition of right -of way, and ensuring that the standards for the protection of natural resources are not compromised in the process of right -of -way acquisition. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendment does not adequately address and further the State Comprehensive Plan including the following goals and policies (163.3177(9):) P E Natural Systems and Recreational Lands Goal (9)(a), Policy 1, 3., 4., regarding the protection of Nvildlife habitat (see objections above); Land Use Goal (15)(a) and Policy (b)6., regarding the regulation of land uses (see objections above): Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendment, as indicated in the objections and recommendations of this report, in order to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. L E C0N��'�/ c0-_I A Receipt of Comments from E \ternal Review Agencies pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(4) B. Citizen Comments Of °.a_ Sr1TM4 FTORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 • (561) 686 -8800 • FL WATS 1- 800 - 432 -2045 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -4680 • www.sfwmd.goc C( GOV 08 -16 September 21, 2007 D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399 -2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Subject: Proposed Amendment Comments Collier County, DCA #07 -2 TDD-(561) 697 -2q -� South Florida Water Management District (District) staff has completed its review of the proposed amendment package, and we offer the following water supply related comments. The submittal consists of seven amendments: Two county- sponsored and five privately- sponsored amendments to the land use plan. The two county- sponsored amendments have no water supply impacts and we offer no comments. Of the five privately- sponsored amendments to the land use plan, three are identified as self - supplied on private wells for which we have no comments at this time. Two of the five privately- sponsored amendments are utility served. One of the utility -served amendments results in a decrease in water use as a result of the land use change, for which we have no comment. The following comment is directed at the one privately - sponsored, utility -served amendment which may result in an increase in water demand. CP- 2005 -06: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This proposal involves the expansion of existing conditional uses on 16.3 acres as a new subdistrict that includes a mental health center and church. The submittal does not include an analysis of the potable water demand associated with this change in land use. The amendment should not be approved until the potable water demand is known and the service provider, Florida Government Utilities Authority, affirms the availability of water supply. Ray Eubanks, Administrator September 21, 2007 Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (561) 682 -6779 or Murray Miller, Senior Planner, at (561)682 -6789. Sincerely, P.K. Sharma, AICP Lead Planner Water Supply Planning Division PKS /jl c: David Burr, SWFRPC Bill Pable, DCA Joseph Schmitt, Collier County September 12, 2007 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Bureau of Local Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 Re: Collier County 07 -2 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000 Chalk, CI ist Goy emcr Iasi t�otikauq, The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) has reviewed Collier County's (County) proposed comprehensive plan amendment package under the required provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J -5 and 9J -11, Florida Administrative Code. Our comments and recommendations are provided to assist your agency in developing the state's response. Transportation Element - Policy 3.6 The County proposes to modify the current transportation element in order that the "requirements for buffering, native vegetation retention, preserve, setback and open space and/or other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right -of -way acquisition or reservation may be reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition activities'. The Department is very concerned by this proposed language. There is no accompanying data and analysis of the possible damages that the reduction, modification or elimination of the existing protective measures will have on the surrounding ecosystems, specifically the wetlands. These requirements were specifically designed to lessen the indirect impacts and put in place various buffers between the natural areas and the encroachment of new projects. There is proposed policy (3.6) has the potential to undo years of sound environmental planning the County had the vision to put in place. Based on the information and analysis submitted in the amendment package, the Department believes that a more thorough evaluation and identification of the effects (direct, indirect and cumulative) is needed. The Department strongly encourages the County to eliminate Policy 3.6 that will allow the transportation corridors planning process to violate established setbacks, buffers and other protective safeguards the County already has in place. These safeguards are effective tools that will allow Collier County to grow as needed, and yet minimize the effects that an expanding urban area will have on the natural ecosystems. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations on the proposed "1 /nrr Prnn•rtinn T.��'�' Prnr,�cc Collier County Page 2 of 2 September 12, 2007 amendment. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact myself at (850) 245 -2169. Yours sincerely, �4- "�W, Chris Stahl Environmental Specialist CJs/ PP 'Watson, Forrest" To <bill.pable @dca.state.fl.us> •' <watsonf @doacs.state.fl.us v , u <mike.mcdaniel @dca.state.fl.us >, > < Ray. Eubanks @dca.state.fl.us >, "Graham Jr, Hank" 09/10/200704:05 PM <grahamh @doacs.state.fl.us >,' Weston, Michael" bcc Subject Collier County Comp. Plan Amendment 07 -2 The Florida Division of Forestry offers the following comments on Collier County Comp. Plan Amendment 07 -2: Petition No. CP- 2005 -13, a development on Lord's Way and County Road 951, will change the land -use designation of the site to allow for medical offices, schools, and churches, among other things. This development is approximately one -half mile to the northwest of a 33 -acre Forest Stewardship Property that conducts occasional prescribed burns to maintain forest ecosystems and will close an additional smoke loading area around the property, requiring more restricted wind conditions from the burners on the property, especially if a hospital is built. Forest managers routinely uses prescribed fire as a management tool to reinvigorate Forests and remove dead and unwanted vegetation. Placing additional structures in close proximity to Forests will make prescribed burning harder to accomplish. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use Map (RFMUD) included with the Amendment does not appear to accurately reflect the boundary of Picayune Strand State Forest. We encourage Collier County to work with Division of Forestry staff to insure all maps include the correct boundary lines of the Picayune Strand State Forest. Please contact Michael Weston with the Caloosahatchee Forestry Center a2 239-690 -3500 or myself if you have any questions. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS E -MAIL. Thanks! Forrest Watson Florida Division of Forestry Forest Resource Planning & Support Services Bureau Phone = 850 - 4140842 Fax = 850 - 488 -0863 Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public- records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. �N jg� FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State DMSION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES September 4, 2007 Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Collier County (07 -2) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. We reviewed multiple proposed amendments to various elements and maps of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan to consider the potential effects of these actions on historic resources. Map amendments in areas of moderate or high archaeological site probability as indicated on the Collier County Archaeological Probability Maps should be subjected to cultural resource assessment survevs prior to land clearing or ground disturbing activities. While our cursory review suggests that the proposed changes may have no adverse effects on historic resources, it is the county's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in Collier County. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245 -6333. Sincerely, �? QhL Frederick P. Gaske. Director xc: Mr. Bill Pable 500 S. Bronougb Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 . bttp: / /www.flheritage.com O Ditectoes Office O Archaeological Research V Historic Preservation O Historical Museums (850) 2456100 • FAX 2456436 (850) 24516441 • FAX 245 "52 (850) 245.6333 • FAX 245."V (850) 24564M • FAX 245-6433 O Southeast Regional Office ❑ Northeast Regional Office Cl Central Florida Regional Office (S 11AIt 111G . FAY•Alh' AQ tO ) RltSq. F A Y. � tAl ii 'Y/)-' q. Fa Y. '1P1-' n ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Michael Fernandez of Planning Development, Inc., requests an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map series to expand'Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center", to allow neighborhood commercial uses to add approximately 60,000 square feet of commercial uses, for property located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and 1 st Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range27 East, consisting of 7± acres; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map series, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public hearing concerning the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the document entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and Words underlined are additions; words straskthFevgh are deletions WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rtl Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day Of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: Aularjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CP- 2005.2 Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series. Words underlined are additions; words &kaek-threyQh are deletions 2 Exhibit A Golden Gate Area Master Plan CP- 2005 -2 Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. [revised text, page 33] This center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right -of -way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.98 acres in size and consists of Tract 144, Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4:86 11_78 acres in size and consists of Tracts 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. *..«««« M...« « ««..«...««._.. «««...« C) Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: [3r° bullet] [revised text, page 34] Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. [new final bullet] [revised text, page 36] Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center: a. Commercial uses shall be limited to the following: 1. medical offices and clinics and professional offices. except surveyors: ands 2. medical related uses, such as a wellness center. b. The ordinance rezoning this property to allow commercial uses shall include the following requirements: 1. no less than sixty (60 %) percent of the gross square footage shall be designated for medical offices and clinics: and. 2. narking for the entire project shall be that required for medical office or clinic use by the Land Development Code (Ordinance #04 -41, as amended), so as to allow 100 percent medical office use. Words underlined are added; words stfask thmugh are deleted. C. Exhibit A CP- 2005 -2 (Ordinance #04 -41, as amended) and other governing regulations d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. waaaa+++ w+ ww+ aaa+ wwwawawaaa++ waaa+ aaaa++ wwwaaa+++ wwaa+ aaa+ wwwaaaawwwwaaaa + +wwwwaaaa + + + + + + + + + +wwwaa ++ Policy 5.1.1 [revised text, page 11] Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following standards: If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low - pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low- pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. Golden Gate Boulevards Neighborhood Center. Words underlined are added; words sNaek through are deleted. EXHIBIT'A' CP -2005-2 MAP 10 WILSON BOULEVARD /GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida SUBJECT SITE CP- 2005 -2 ADOPTED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No. 2003 -44 N TS PREPARED BY GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: GGMP- 43- 2007.DWG DATE: 1/2007 LEGEND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES J NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SETTLEMENT AREA ORDINANCE NO.07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Margaret Perry of WilsonMiller, Inc., and Richard Yovanovich, Esq., of Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A., request an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically Tracts 43, 50, 59 and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, located in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3± acres; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map series, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold a public hearing concerning the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and Words underlined are additions; words struGk4preugh are deletions WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3'd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CP- 2005 -6 Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series Words underlined are additions; words skask;preuo are deletions 2 Exhibit A CP- 2005 -6 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Policy 1.1.2: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use District and Subdistricts for: ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT h. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict [new text, page 5] 5) Conditional Uses Subdistrict b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: [revised text, page 42] • Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be not further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except as Permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION a. Estates — Mixed Use District 8. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict [new text, page 46] institutional and related uses. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the The following institutional uses are Permitted through the conditional use Process within the Subdistrict: a. Churches and other Places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities associated with the David LawrE Center. d. Essential services as set forth in Section 2.01.03 of the Collier County Land e. g. Medical offices associated with the David Lawrence Center. [Words underlined are added. Words stmek-threugh are deleted.] T F N F (A G F z 3 a E= s 0 `m m 0 F h F LEGEND ® IN111 COAA.l.IAL I SEIiLCNLNi ARE. ■ AC-TI CENRR ❑ PoLOEN CAIE 2S 4OLOEx CA1E PMISMC PRQESSCNAL OfiICE CdNEPtIPL SU00151PoCi ® NNPA .""'Al ® ,.ERCAt, S R051PoC1 00'MI iOMN QNIER CONNCflL14 SNBDISiPoCI ❑ NNBAN NISI-14TN ® CIXLIER BWLEVPNO CONMERCIAL SVBDiSiNCI RANDALL BWLEVAW COMMEROAL SOBOISiRICI I I NME MOE ROPD xDCMBW110LO CErviENS u EO uX SVBDIS1NCl Nf51ERx fSIA25 NEM1L .11M.Ci ..DENII]L ,� CENSiY BAND ■ ...Al IN1111ONAL 9JBDrs1RICl RIIENWANLE AC1NIY ¢NIIR ■ AS OESCAM[D IN C NTY WOE 1.. ENE... RAN. NONE ..SLCV.ES oOL.Es ANO LR.NO Js oE..Al l u CINro'.N YCTON OF ME OGDCN EAIE MEA WASIER PLAN. A. AMINUO NAPLES IMMORALEE ROAD EXHIBIT A MAP 0 MI. 2 NI, PNEPNLD BV 44A9NCS AND IICN".CAL 9JPPONi SLCTWI C� 11 CELELOAZI AND ENNRpNENiAL SEANCLS OISg 0.E'. M -2CO - OB.DNC OAT'. 2/2007 R 26 E I R27E CP- 2005.06 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMORALEE ROAD R 28E r V Z r N F Q o F z m � w a MS 15 4785 n m � �T F U F n N n w Q a .7 Q z 0 F r a a z 4 Q a a � _ � MS 1S 4709 � 3 _ w a o Q � a w F" Q a z w Q a o � ° _5 O� FN ww Nj O� as hZV w; ¢Z° °p¢ MS 15 U1Z9 MS 1S 47Z9 �> w win o <an Uzu Qom m °O �3r a� aoa 6V° ro w y0 U n �N p W 7U pp6 F Y y ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold of O. Grady Minor and Associates and Richard Yovanovich, Esq., of Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A., request an amendment to the Future Land Use Map and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict', for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use Subdistrict, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 90,000 square feet of retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8t acres; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Future Land Use Element and Future land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. Words underlined are additions; words stw&threugh are deletions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, in accordance With Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3" Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of _ .2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: 9'' Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CP- 2005 -9 Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series Words underlined are additions; words stwsk- thfowo are deletions 2 Exhibit A CP- 2005 -9 Future Land Use Element: [page 59] A. Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District 2. Corkscrew Island Neiahborhood Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict, comprising approximately 8 acres, is located on the northwest corner of the Immokalee Road /Platt Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to Development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the followina reauirements and limitations: a. Rezonina is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. The Subdistrict shall be developed as a unified planned development with a common architectural theme. C. The Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum gross leasable floor area of 70.000 square feet. adoption of this Subdistrict. e. At the time of rezoning. access shall be restricted as deemed appropriate so as to provide safe ingress and egress. uses, so as to insure compatibility with surrounding uses and the rural character chemicals or solvents (e.g. dry cleaners). Words underlined are added; words stMek through are deleted. ii �Lg F, of U O W a F xm w I T 40 3 1 T 47 3 1 T 43 3 I T 40 S I T 50 3 1 T 51 3 I T St 3 1 T 53 3 e lift !gg gB gkill qq cI ICI •.� I I ^#. I I I tpo I I� •F .F S ,F ,F ,F ,S ,S yy gg @@ gg p y g•4 1 d i � it If 9101, 11 1 i I q H1,111 . s 1 g v ii1i1i111i$ ra gk . gk? ri as € g4 ! ➢'�F �jp�9y� 4 $ l S I uoo��n■ �tl� I o9 I or•® If- it g NZ Ix k I sc5 g` pp q pp yp #g gg k g ggpg �q� 9� V Sc. 3 �i 19R1€ a e1�geg¢ggs.igyp'gye? €g o1111k ,,• ig9 A � � €�3 al ��sA •s9 �g9 Alt i 7�ilkge ig A S6o�r�rti�g��41 ❑uuo�n�: ,e�.5r,31g s 5 7 � k 3 " ww a 3 kj � y8 i a Fn a IL U , I qFj € � I r a k a LL � - •,fir ��,�/ w °€ � tiq W P dm4 C. LLI J O 1T� C sni sua sari I ssti sssi J _ alai sTSi 5 .u.,,s O �y5 I . e s is CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT FXHIAIT A .0 E PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 0 500 FT DATE: 2/2007 FILE: CP- 2005- 09A.DWG LEGEND ® -j RABBIT RUN ROAD - LUTTER LN. PLATT ROAD PLATT ROAD m 0 a SU JECT SITE P -200 -09 z 0 U WILD TURKEY DR IVE WILD TURKEY D IVE .0 E PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 0 500 FT DATE: 2/2007 FILE: CP- 2005- 09A.DWG LEGEND ® ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Robert L. Duane of Hole Monies and Associates, requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Services Subdistrict' for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 366,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and to allow non - church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, up to 296 market rate and essential services personnel housing units, for property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69t acres; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map series, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and Words underlined are additions; words 646*41;rGugh are deletions WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this Amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this Amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3'd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of _ .2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CP- 2005 -13 Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series Words underlined are additions; words sfraskthreugh are deletions 2 Exhibit A Future Land Use Element A. Urban — Mixed Use District CP- 2005 -13 17. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict [Page 3.31] transoortation network and Public services while serving the needs of the community at large. All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations. a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD b. Allowable land uses• 1) Community f2 2) 3) 4) 5) Parks open space. and recreational uses 368.000 square feet f. One hundred fifty of the 296 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units- ne +ho„ �_ _ "_ , - .. Assistance Plan. Words underlined are added; words sEfuek-tgrouffh are deleted. Exhibit A CP- 2005 -13 services personnel dwelling units — comprised of a minimum of ten (10) 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 150 units Tor tnose earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty -five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners Land Development Code requirements k. At the time of rezoning /PUD amendment the petitioner shall be required to De issuea until improvements to the existing deficient segment of Davis Boulevard are complete. Words underlined are added; Words StFUsk through are deleted. 2 -- 4 7 M T N s i Q E T U 5 T 19 s 72111g, O ga !'i5 A e x1 1� 15 e ■ CL I I a` 4119 4iF @i'[4ex'4 ❑nonE ❑ ?II z °or�1 ®I x 53y Y� a3'S •a YiY f i1�islal 6 !xy� 9Y i,�o1, 5d¢9i l��i��'s11��8�a4pk6��l`$k�I ap� 1 •■oElowls p ONE f 1 I ; d �1a �Y•(� ¢t ill agag ®g® g¢g¢I gEg i 3 � 9 P11g1111> �e ga ggive g"gg pvpapp,oppe 33 §§ p 5 j39j g2 1 591 $�9G °,ry 3314 ipYp S�nQ(71:1a 3x97x ❑1 ■ ■ ■13�f -13a a`e yey�'g 'b eE ,t ,B a ,a 8 CL I I a` 4119 4iF @i'[4ex'4 ❑nonE ❑ ?II z °or�1 ®I x 53y Y� a3'S •a YiY pg 1 �xa�[� �33�f3 � F 6 !xy� 9Y i,�o1, 5d¢9i ap� 1 •■oElowls p ONE f 1 I ; d �1a �Y•(� ¢t ill agag ®g® g¢g¢I gEg i 3 � 9 P11g1111> g e� $pp 111111 [ Yggg qqx111 'n 33 §§ p 5 j39j g2 1 591 $�9G °,ry 3314 ipYp S�nQ(71:1a 3x97x ❑1 ■ ■ ■13�f -13a a`e 5�xxg %1 G� m a� W z e e sirs a a x x i' n, 4 1a.a i i i° nI 1 ! y ( II )4 k kl..v q yt� I ° € fill , 17 7 1 ui cc r i (o oil °'1 i� ) d Q z N 4L sul I snl 1 snl I snl 1 sul s4s10 I 8 291 I Yx91 I � COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMUNITY SERVICE SUBDISTRICT Ph❑TION CP- 2005-13 s THE aue c Arcs k E CLUB EsTATCs ORIW x THE CLUB ESTATES N LES LAKES OUNWY CLu INVERNESS CLUB OR LORO'S WAY ,.N, BUGCT ORELHES SUB ECT ITE CP 2005 13 AF 5 LAMES C NTRY CLUB MAMISOCM PARK COMMERCE CENTER PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION DATE: 2/2007 FILE: CP- 2005- 13A.DWG j m., LEGEND FE] SUBDISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sec., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Comprehensive Planning Staff has initiated and amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands, for 20 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 13 and 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 283* acres total; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map series, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. Words underlined are added; words stwskihfeugh are deletions 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3" Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: r' Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CPSP - 2005 -14 Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Map and Map Series. Words underlined are added; words 5twek4Weu0 are deletions 2 xm W a T 48 T 51 S PETITION CPSP- 2005 -14 fl gd �B d 3y Y } LU I�IJ L1 oIsl I: ISSOr� ®I in r e 4 I'll ° �I Will �.I! �sEH H1bS 23 �ifa r' $Iggye3 Ok E LL, VVV Ira q E loll S l9 1 Y 1 -2 e 3i ❑ori. tag ■I11� @�I..J T➢■ la ci1%Y�Ei gi T 48 T 51 S PETITION CPSP- 2005 -14 Jw. ^" III n t s I ' 5 LU in Ok LL, VVV Ira S OS 1 S l9 1 W � 1 -2 e .Yh �x �.al5wv` L6 gi LY 1 T TY 1 $ 61 Jw. ^" III n t s I ' 5 oll I T 59 S j w i I a I I _ dim LU in LL, VVV Ira S OS 1 S l9 1 W � 1 -2 e .Yh �x �.al5wv` L6 gi LY 1 T TY 1 $ 61 oll I T 59 S j w i I a I I _ dim in Ira S OS 1 S l9 1 L 3 Z9 1 S 99 1 1 -2 Q CL a I `W O W 0 W 2 W J J LU m 2 F- 0 Z r� d 6 PETITION CPSP- 2005-14A F > _ a o a m' Z o w a ¢ o z a w � x 3 � o o � x u 3 � z p J F G w � tt � n w J z o U 0 I O V Z O Z Q ✓� V W a� ao N p L Q n s li 1 G o� -wo � Vwl O w�Q w��G =¢m <04 moo w= a�w �Ga 6Vp ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sec., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Transportation Planning Staff has initiated an amendment to the Transportation Element, to add new Policies 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3,8, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Transportation Element, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Transportation Element, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Words underlined are added; words 6tfwGk2Hreu94 are deletions i SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Transportation Element, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rtl Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffiency: Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CPSP- 2005 -15 Transportation Element Words underlined are added; words strask4hreugh are deletions 2 Exhibit A CPSP - 2005 -15 Transportation Element: [page 13] OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of -way. [Note: No revisions to Policies 3.1 through 3.4 are proposed.] Policy 3.5 that: 1. 2. 3. 4, 5. 6. resources: and oruiecteu areas. For the purposes of this Policy Protected thoroughfares shall include 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or Planned roadway or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established: or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transnnrtntion natwnrka whk•h hn"e hog. 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to Proposed grade separated intersections. Policy 3.6 Words underlined are added; words strask-threegh are deleted. Exhibit A CPSP- 2005 -15 means. Words underlined are added; words sirask thFeugh are deleted. p ORDINANCE NO. 2007 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR: AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES FOR THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR'S) MAP, OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sec., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Staff initiated an amendment to the Future Land Use Map Series Map "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas ", proposed Well fields and Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) to depict new and expanded well fields; and WHEREAS, Collier County did not submit the Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did not review the amendment to the Future Land Use Map Series to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 15, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the map amendment to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts these amendments to the Future Land Use Element Map Series, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The map of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated by reference herein. 1 SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of these amendments shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on these amendments may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy Of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rtl Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal suffiency: MARJORIE M. STUDENT - STIRLING Assistant County Attorney Petition CPSP - 2005 -16 Future Land Use Element Map Series Map 'Wellhead Protection Areas" 2 COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs PROPOSED NORTHEAST REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT PHASE IA WELIFIELD AREA CARICA ROAD AREAS OF INTEREST ASR CR 846 a N M � MMOXALEE WELLFIELD CR 846 AVE MARIA ORANGE TREE ORANGEtREE / WELLFIELD 858 / \CR 7 A NAPLES EAST T GOLDEN GATE fJ WELLFIELD 1 CITY OF NAPLES COASTAL RIDGE WELLFIELD 0 SCALE 0 5ML AMENDED - 9EPDDIB 10. 2003 OP. NP. 2003 -44 AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Ora. No. 2007-18 PREPARED 8H CRIP " AN0 ME C. CWMUN" LE CNELWNT ma ENVKMEI Y M. CCLL[R CWNTY P 110N CONI OATS: 9/2007 NIL RFP2R12-2002.DW —IN OPERATION FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT _ PLANT WELLFIELD m DID Lmj SOUTH HAWTHORN WELLFIELD EXTENSION w (UNDER CONSTRUCTION, 4 FALL 08 COMPLETION) C0 D: w US w MANATEE R ROAD ASR EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD m U ®RELIABILITY WELLS US . (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) aa WELLFIELD AREA E ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY £ETON IY9 NNDN PRLYENTON OH DEPT Proposed Future Land Use map in the Growth Management Plan ORDINANCE NO. 07- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS - AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Reverend Wes Wicker requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, to modify the Conditional Use Subdistrict, Transitional Conditional Uses provision, to allow a church as a Transitional Conditional Use for the subject site abutting a residential use, for property located on the south side of Immokalee Road and approximately 300 feet east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of ±2.6 acres; and _.. WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on August 6, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its findings in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report from the Department of Community Affairs to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, to the Growth Management Plan on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of this amendment, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report; the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment, and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on November 26, 2007, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. Words underlined are additions; words sirask4hf000 are deletions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and maps of the amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES COLETTA Chairman Approved as to form and legalsuffiency: Marjorie M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Petition CP- 2006.4 Golden Gale Area Master Plan Words underlined are additions; words strasl44hrGugh are deletions 2 Exhibit A CP- 2006 -4 Golden Gate Area Master Plan: [pages 42, 43] e) Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits submitted for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. Temporary Use permits for model homes shall have a duration of three (3) years from the date of approval. No subsequent issuance of a Conditional Use permit shall be for a duration exceeding two (2) years. The total time period for Temporary Use and Conditional Use permits together shall not exceed five (5) years. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates -Mixed Use District. 3. 97. Words underlined are added; words stFUGk threegh are deleted. AGENDA ITEM 48 Coi Cher Cou -vtty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY , DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2007 RE: PETITION NO. CP- 2005 -2; GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) I. AGENT /APPLICANT /OWNER: Agent: Michael Fernandez, AICP Planning Development, Incorporated 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 Naples, Fl. 34103 Applicant: Mr. Michael A. Corder 3821 3rd Avenue, SW Naples, Ff. 34117 Owner: Mr. Michael A. Corder 3821 3`d Avenue, SW Naples, Fl. 34117 II. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property, containing 6.92 acres, is located in Golden Gate Estates in the southeast corner of Golden Gate Blvd. and I" Street, SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East within the Rural Estates Planning Community. (see two maps that follow). AGENDA ITEM 4B Source: Collier County Property Appraiser's records III. REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan ( GGAMP) text and Future Land Use Map Series by: Amending Section III.B.2.a.2)b) of the GGAMP as follows: Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right -of -way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.98 acres in size and consists of Tract 144, Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.86 11_78 acres in size and consists of Tracts 124 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126. Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. Underlined text is added, struck through teat deleted. 2 AGENDA ITEM 4B Amending the GGAMP Future Land Use Map Series by Amending Map 10 entitled, "Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center by adding the subject 3 tracts of land, totaling 6.92 acres, to the existing 4.86 acres of land currently within the southwest quadrant of this neighborhood center. E HIBITW MAP 10 WILSON BOULEVARD /GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD CENTER 1 Collier County, Florida p Oi ITib10KALEE OX 0 A SUBJECT SITE CP- 2005 -2 LEGEND GOLDEN cAr[ MENi ESTATES ESTAM ARLA AREA AODPTEO — SEPTEMBER 10. 2003 Ord No. 2003 -44 NEIGH13p2HO0D CENTER NT LNITY AND COMMIL PREPARM ET: GRAPHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CAE NTAL SET CES DI SEPNCES DIVISION 1O 4E- 20PMENT Am ' /CENTAL f1LE fGMP- e3- 20O].OMG GATE 1/200] AGENDA ITEM 4B IV. PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: No specific development project has been advanced by the applicant for the subject 6.92 acre site as shown in Exhibit A (proposed map and text amendment). The purpose of this application is to amend the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center by increasing the center size in the southwest quadrant of this intersection from 4.85 acres to 11.78 acres. Such an amendment, if approved, would permit a rezone to proceed followed by, or concurrent with, a subdivision plat and /or site development plan. V. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: A. Existing Conditions of the Site. The site in question is undeveloped, heavily wooded, relatively flat and has frontage on SW 1" Street, Wilson Boulevard, and Golden Gate Boulevard. B. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning and Future Land Use Designations. • North.... Existing land use to the north of the subject property is Golden Gate Boulevard and undeveloped land. The FLUM Designation to the north is both GGAMP Neighborhood Center and Estates. The existing zoning to the north is E, Estates. • East..... Existing land use to the east of the subject property is undeveloped land and Wilson Boulevard. The FLUM Designation to the east is both GGAMP Neighborhood Center and Estates. The existing zoning to the east is both CPUD (Wilson Boulevard Center) and E, Estates. • South... Existing land use is single family dwellings and undeveloped lots to the south. The FLUM Designation to the south is Estates. The zoning to the south of the subject property is E, Estates. • West.... Existing land use to the west of the subject property is 1s' Street, SW and single family dwellings. Existing FLUM Designation for the area to the west is Estates. The existing zoning of the area to the west of the subject property is E, Estates. There is an existing older small convenience store and restaurant/shops development located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard, occupying approximately 2 acres of land. This area is shown on the FLUM as a GGAMP Neighborhood Center and is zoned C -2. Finally, there is a small commercial center under construction at the southeast corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard at Wilson Boulevard which has a FLUM Designation of GGAMP Neighborhood Center and zoning of CPUD. In summary, the primary existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding or directly opposite the subject 3 properties are Estates -type residential with existing commercial use at the northeast corner of the intersection serving this Center and a small commercial development under construction at the southeast corner of this intersection. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DATA AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 AGENDA ITEM 4B "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue... the Department will review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the consistency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. BACKGROUND TO GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN The following is a summary of the background of the planned 'Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Center" (1) History of Citizen Participation and Adoption of the "Golden Gate Area Master Plan" by the Board of County Commissioners. The GGAMP was adopted within the context of the following, which is an excerpt from the Master Plan's Introduction Section found on page 2 of the GGAMP. `As part of the revised Growth Management Plan, the County adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) in 1991. The GGAMP was further revised in 1997. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan provides growth management regulations for the designated Golden Gate Area (see Map 1). The Golden Gate Area was previously subject to the regulations outlined in the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE). However, in 1991, the unique characteristics of the area resulted in adoption of a Master Plan for Golden Gate, as a separate Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan superseded former Objective 1, Policy 1. 1, and Policy 1.3 of the FLUE. All other Goals, Objectives, and Policies contained in the FLUE and all other Elements of the Growth Management Plan remain applicable to the Golden Gate Area. In addition, the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map will be used instead of the County -Wide Future Land Use Map. In April 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for Collier County. As a result of the recommendations made in the EAR, Ordinance 91- 5 AGENDA ITEM 4B 15, which adopted the original Golden Gate Area Master Plan, was repealed and a new Ordinance 47 -64 was adopted. In February of 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate a restudy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Accordingly, in June of 2001, Comprehensive Planning Section Staff requested that the Board appoint an advisory committee, consisting of residents of Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates, to aid Staff in the restudy process. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee met on over twenty (20) occasions, between June 2001 and June 2003, to consider proposed amendments to the GGAMP, as well as other matters related to the Golden Gate Area. All meetings were open to the public, many of these meetings were well attended. The restudy process was divided into two phases. The County transmitted Phase I amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs in April, 2003. These amendments were adopted, as Ordinance 2003 -44 in September, 2003. Phase 11 amendments were adopted in October, 2004, as Ordinance 2004 -71. " (2) History of Ownership of the 3 Subject Tracts of Land. The County Property Appraiser's records and the application for this amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) both show that the current owner caused the recordation of a deed in his name for 2 of the 3 subject tracts of land in September, 2004, with the P tract being recorded in June, 2005. TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT 3 TRACTS OF LAND AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER Residential Development • North.... single family residential • East..... single family residential • South... single family residential • West .... single family residential Commercial Development There has been some very recent commercial development within the existing boundaries of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center as follows: • Northeast corner of intersection. Approximately 2 -acres of the 8.45 acres included in this corner of the Neighborhood Center are developed with a convenience store, small restaurant, and shops under C -2 zoning. The remaining approximately 6.45 acres of the 8.45 acres is currently undeveloped. • Southeast corner of intersection. This 7.15 -acre corner of the Neighborhood Center is known as 'Wilson Boulevard Center CPUD, a Commercial Planned Unit Development ". A total of 5.0 acres is under development and 2.15 acres set aside for Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard right of way purposes. This portion of the center will be built out in the near future. • Southwest corner of intersection. A 4.19 acre portion of the 4.98 acres within the Neighborhood Center are zoned in the Commercial Planned Unit Development District (CPUD) by approval of Ordinance No. 06 -47 by the Board of County Commissioners on October 10, 2006. The development is known as "Snowy Egret Plaza CPUD, A Commercial Planned Unit Development ". This site is currently undeveloped. • Northwest corner of intersection. This 4.98 acres zoned E, Estates, and designated as part of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center is currently undeveloped. AGENDA ITEM 4B In summary, the recent trends in land development surrounding the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center are clearly very low density Estates -type single family detached residential. There have been no new trends or chances in this development pattern of the surroundinc area since the October. 2004, amendment to the GGAMP. The continuing residential development surrounding this Center is in keeping with the GGAMP. Additionally, the commercial developments, both existing and under construction at the northeast and southeast corners of this intersection, are in keeping with the GGAMP for this neighborhood center. taULUEN GATE 13OULEVARU AREA MASTER PLAN IS GRANTED. The granting of this FLUM amendment would create a iaoged Center boundary in the southwest quadrant of this intersection which would protrude farther west than the west boundary of the Center in the northwest quadrant of the intersection and farther south than the and south boundary of the Center in the southeast quadrant of this intersection. This jagged boundary would likely encourage future requests for amendments to this Neighborhood Center of the GGAMP and other amendments to the GGAMP for non - residential designations involving properties presently located outside of the existing neighborhood center boundary. Additionally, with the approval of this requested amendment, the abutting properties would then be eligible for conditional uses as provided for in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the GGAMP. In summary, approval of this request may lead to: • uncertainty by surrounding residential property owners of the permanency of the boundaries of this center; • negative impacts (noise, lights, smells, traffic) upon the existing adjoining and nearby single family properties to the east, south, and west of the subject tracts of land,• • similar requests from other owners of other properties immediately adjoining or near the boundaries of the present center,' • creeping commercial strip development and higher intensity development along both Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard; and • a greater future difficulty of the County in defending denials of similar amendments to the FLUM for higher intensity non - residential and mixed use developments near this intersection. Staff believes that the application to expand this neighborhood district is premature and unwarranted for the following reasons: • Wilson BoulevardiGolden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center Status. At present, 9.15 acres (36 %) of the existing 25.56 -acre Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Center is developed, under construction, or set aside for street right of way, leaving 16.56 vacant acres (64 %) within the existing Center boundaries for future neighborhood commercial development through re- zonings. • Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center. The existing 21.84 -acre "Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center" (3 miles to the east) is 100% vacant land at this time. This Center, once developed, will also be easily accessible to the residents surrounding the Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard 7 AGENDA ITEM 4B Center, which makes the need for the subject Center's expansion seem doubtful at this time or any time in the near future. Orange Tree PUD. The Orange Tree PUD, located 3 miles to the northeast of the subject property (east side of Immokalee Road and north of Randall Boulevard) has a total of 60,000 square feet of commercial building floor area authorized on 22 acres in the PUD with 21,515 square feet of building space having received permits to date. A pending zoning application would increase the allowable commercial development in Orange Tree PUD to 34 acres and 309,000 square feet. The East of County Road 951 Study. This study, presently underway, will provide an overall calculation of land use needs, including commercial land, within the area of Collier County, east of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard). Until this study is completed, approval of additional commercial development may be premature. In summary, there does not appear to be a public need at this time to expand the "Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Center" given the availability of 16.56 acres of vacant land within this Center and the 21.84 vacant acres of land within the "Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center" 3 miles to the east in addition to the 60,000 square feet of Orange Tree PUD- authorized commercial building space. As an alternative to the GMPA being requested, the applicant could pursue a conditional use permit for a transitional use between the existing Center and the Estates properties to the south and west in accordance with the "Conditional Uses Subdistrict" of the "Golden Gate Area Master Plan ". GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. In view of the analysis of this request as outlined above, the following inconsistencies with the GMP and the GGAMP have been found: "Neighborhood Center Subdistrict - Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning" In summary, the current Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Center" does not guarantee commercial zoning to properties within or outside of the currently designated center. Further, an addition to the boundaries of this center will discourage proper subdistrict development intended to concentrate commercial zoning so as to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development and create local focal points within the Golden Gates Estates Community. COMMERCIAL DEMAND ANALYSIS The applicant has submitted a brief commercial demand analysis as part of the submittal for this amendment to the GGAMP. However, staff analysis indicates the lack of analysis within the report of the competing impacts upon the subject Neighborhood Center from the following nearby approved or planned commercial areas: • approved Orange Tree PUD- 60,000 square feet of commercial building space, of which 21,515 square feet has been permitted (Neighborhood Shoppes at Orange Tree); AGENDA ITEM 4B competing impacts of planned neighborhood commercial at Golden Gate Boulevard /Everglades Boulevard; • Potential for Rural Villages in the RFMUD that would include commercial component that could meet some of the future commercial demand. This includes the pending Immokalee Road South PUD extending from Immokalee Road to future Vanderbilt Beach Road extension, west of Golden Gate Estates; and • A Rural village is allowed in the North Belle Meade Overlay District south of this Neighborhood Center. In summary, the commercial demand analysis is incomplete and overstates the demand for the need of additional planned commercial development at the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard intersection, beyond that which is already authorized by this GGAMP Neighborhood Center. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The Environmental Services Department finds that there are no conflicts posed by the proposed GMP amendment with Environmental Services Department policies and programs. However, at the time of the PUD or construction plans, the native vegetation requirement of 15% will be assessed. ARCHAELOGICAL IMPACTS This land is located outside of any areas of historical or archaelogical as identified on the County's Historical /Archaelogical Probability maps, so no cultural assessment of these properties is required. The applicant has also had written correspondence with the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources and it has been determined that there are no archaelogical /historic resources on this site. TRAFFIC CAPACITY/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS Transportation Planning Staffs review and analysis is as follows: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard and proposes 45,000 square feet of commercial floor space.The project produces 4,040 daily gross new trips (2 -way) and 370 PM Peak Hour gross new trips. The existing and committed (E +C) network consists of Golden Gate Boulevard as a four lane section west of the property and a two lane section to the east. The two lane section is expected to be improved within the five year planning period to four or possibly six lanes. The application shows approximately 49% pass by which is consistent with a rural shopping center located at the comer of two major roadways. It should be noted that the pass by rate in this location may be even higher. The reduction would mean that the net new trips would be roughly half of the above project trips although the total trips would still impact the turns at the project driveways. The growth rate on Golden Gate Boulevard has exceeded 10% in the past three years and is expected deficient in 2008. W AGENDA ITEM 4B It is anticipated that the completion of Vanderbilt Beach Road extension from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard and continuing east will bring Golden Gate Boulevard back into an acceptable level of service. The Vanderbilt Beach Road extension is funded only for design in the five rear planning period. Conclusion: The addition of 45,000 square feet of commercial is not consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. However, the addition of commercial services at this location would provide a destination that would reduce the need for the local resident to travel back to the urban area for these services. The project also has an above average potential for pass by at this location. Recommendation: That this project is approved with the stipulation that the level of service on Golden Gate Boulevard is at °E" or better and Vanderbilt Beach Road extension is completed from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard prior to project impacts on the roadway network. However, the extension of Vanderbilt Beard Road is not included in the County's financially feasible Capital Improvements Element. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACTS • Potable Water. Public Utilities advises that this project location is not within the Collier County Water and Sewer District Service Area This project is located on the zone of the existing Collier County Tamiami Wellfield. The Rules and Regulations for projection of wellfields need to be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this project need to be shown on all future site development plans, subdivision plats or any other site plan applications. Further, the applicant acknowledges that the development of the parcel will require the installation of a potable water well consistent with the applicable provisions of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including FDEP and SFWMD. • Sanitary Sewer. The applicant acknowledges that public sanitary sewer facilities are not available in the immediate area and therefore the development of the parcel will require the installation of a septic tank system to be permitted consistent with the applicable provisions of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including FDEP and SFWMD. • Drainage. The proposed development will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day storm standards and other applicable standards of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including the SFWMD. • Solid Waste. The established Level of Service (LOS) for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at previous three years average tons per capital disposal rate with 10 years of permitted landfill capacity available for Collier County solid waste disposal. No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities from this 45,000 square foot project are anticipated • Parks. The proposed development will not increase the population density and, therefore, will have no affect on the community and the regional parks. • Arterial and Collector Roads. A Traffic Impact Statement was prepared by the applicant, reviewed by the Collier County Transportation staff and has been addressed in the previous section. 10 AGENDA ITEM 4B VII. FINDINGS AND CONLUSIONS The following are findings and conclusions as a result of the reviews and analyses of this request: 1. East of 951 Study. Due to the East of 951 Study, now underway, this amendment may be premature at this time. 2. GGAMP Re -Study Committee. The GGAMP Restudy Committee did not recommend a neighborhood center on the subject property, rather the neighborhood center location and size as presently exists. 3. The Existing surroundina land use adjoining and in close proximity of the subject properties is single family detached in all directions as represented by large Estates lot development. The only nearby existing commercial development is located on an approximately 2 -acre site at the northeast corner of the intersection of Wilson Boulevard at Golden Gate Boulevard and the 5 -acre PUD, currently under construction, at the southeast corner of this intersection. 4. The Trends in land development and Street Development. Land development has been single family detached Estates type residential development in all directions from the subject 3 tracts of land with the exception of the non - residential commercial development located at the northeast and southeast corners of Wilson Boulevard at Golden Gate Boulevard. Estates housing construction has been very substantial in recent years. If this residential construction continues there will be some yet to be determined demand for retail and personal service uses as envisioned in the GGAMP for the Golden Gate Boulevard/Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard /Everglades Boulevard intersections. However, the timing and extent of the demand for such commercial developments at the subject intersection is dependent upon a number of factors including the rate of new residential construction, proximity of competing commercial sites, and changing demographics, traffic and consumer spending patterns. For example, the current widening of Immokalee Road and substantial new residential developments just 3 miles to the north of the subject site may well generate demand for larger shopping and service areas than could be expected on Golden Gate Boulevard, thus reducing the demand for commercial development on Golden Gate at both the Wilson Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard intersections. Further, the pending extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road, paralleling Golden Gate Boulevard just 1 mile to the north, may have the effect of initially reducing traffic counts on Golden Gate Boulevard and the rate of growth of future traffic counts. Lower traffic counts could well result in a reduction in the need for future commercial land development at this intersection. 5. The Future Land Use Map for the area immediately surrounding the subject 3 properties is Estates type development with the exception of the adjoining Neighborhood Center designation for the land to the east and north of the subject 3 tracts. 6. The Permanency of the Boundaries of the Center will be compromised if the proposed amendment to the GGAMP is approved and could lead to other similar future amendment requests on lands adjoining the current Center boundaries in the southeast and northwest quadrants of this intersection and Center. 7. The Availability of undeveloped neighborhood center land includes 23.56 acres of undeveloped land within the subject `Wilson Boulevard /Golden Gate Boulevard Center" and 11 AGENDA ITEM 48 an additional 21.84 acres of undeveloped land within the "Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center ". This amount of undeveloped Center land is a good indicator that the requested additional 6.92 acres of land for the subject Center expansion is unwarranted at this time. VIII. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING ON JANUARY 3 2007 The agent/applicant duly advertised, noticed and held the required NIM on January 3, 2007, at 6:00pm at the Estates Branch Library, 1266 Golden Gate Boulevard. The meeting was attended by approximately 25 to 30 persons having an interest in the application. The following were some of the concerns /questions /statements voiced by those attending the meeting after listening to the applicant's proposal: • Will the proposed Walgreens Drug Store happen? • Will there be vehicular access to 1" Street? • Concerns about the additional noise, traffic, lights at night, and smells from dumpsters (particularly from homeowner on the west side of 1St Street) and that a 25 foot wide buffer would not be sufficient. • Concern about this being the beginning of a "cancer" of commercial development and higher intensity development which is what some of those present stated that they did not want to happen in the Estates. • Several persons stated that they do not want more commercial near their homes and that driving to existing commercial areas poses no problems for them. • The applicant pointed out that there is a proposed mixed use development with commercial and housing proposed for the approximate 36 acres on the north side of Golden Gate Boulevard just to the west of Wilson Boulevard and that there is an application pending for that development in which he is personally involved (GMP Amendment Petition CP- 2006 -2). This statement was made by Mr. Fernandez, the applicant's representative, after a member of the audience raised the subject and asked questions about it. IX. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: The Environmental Council does not normally review this type of application. X. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This staff report has been reviewed and approved by the Office of the Collier County Attorney. XI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In view of the reviews and analyses provided within this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward Petition CP- 2005 -02 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to transmit to the Department of Community Affairs. 12 AGENDA ITEM 4B Prepared by: V, Thomas V, Thomas Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department r�] Reviewed by: �- bt°` � Date: David Weeks, AICP, Manager Compr en iv Planning Department Reviewed by: Date: ^� Randy Cohen, AICP, Director Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed by: Date: Z - Z-o -0 9- MadorW M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney Approved by: �� Date: a Zq Jo eph K. Schmitt, Administrator C mmunity Development and Environmental Services Division PETITION NO. CP- 2005 -02 This petition has been advertised for the March 5, 2007, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007, BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mr. Mark Strain, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A (Map '10) reflecting the proposed amendment to the FLUM and accompanying text amendment. 16 Wilson Boulev at Golden Gate oulevard CP -2005-2 Growth Man en endment Neighborhood Information Meeting Golden Gate Fire Station #71 October 22, 2007 5:30 p.m. Attendees: Collier County: Thomas Greenwood, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Property Owner Aeent Representatives: Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, President, Planning Development Incorporated Terri Fernandez, Vice - President, Planning Development Incorporated Sandra Guajardo, Project Coordinator, Planning Development Incorporated Jonathan Delaney, Engineering Intem, Planning Development Incorporated Property Owner: Mr. Michael Corder This Neighborhood Information Meeting began at 5:30 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:30 p.m_ Mr. Michael Fernandez of the firm of Planning Development introduced himself as the representative of the owner, Mr. Michael Corder, who was also present at the meeting. Mr. Corder is the petitioner of a Growth Management Plan Amendment. He also introduced Mr. Thomas Greenwood, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning, as the representative of Collier County. Mr. Fernandez began his presentation by stating that this is the second Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM). The initial NIM was held prior to the petition being heard by the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners at the Transmittal Hearings and subsequently sent to the State of Florida. The project was originally submitted to Collier County in March of 2005; so the petition has been going through the process for about 2 '/2 years so far. Since that time the petition has been refined and that is why the petitioner offered and the Board requested that this second neighborhood information meeting be held. Mr. Fernandez explained that this project is located immediately adjacent to the proposed Walgreen's site at the southwest comer of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. He stated that the Walgreen's site has been rezoned and is in the site development plan (SDP) process. The Walgreen's parcel is across the street from an L- shaped shopping center that is currently under construction and diagonally across from Gs. The subject parcel is a little less than seven (7) acres in size and is configured in an L -shape around the future Walgreen's site. During this ongoing petition process and in listening to the neighbors' interests and concerns, the project has been refined from its original "commercial center" to a medical, medical - related and professional office center. A commitment was made before the Board of County Commissioners that sixty (60%) percent of the permitted square footage will be dedicated to medical and medical related uses. Also development standards for parking which enable medical use will be provided for the entire project, so that up to 1000/a of the square footage could be medical and medical related uses. In this fine tuning of the project, other commercial uses have been deleted, tike restaurants, that otherwise would have been permitted. Page I of 3 It was mentioned, that prior to seeking the proposed Amendment, that due to this site's adjacency to commercial zoned land, the property was entitled to seek a Conditional Use approval for such transitional uses as schools, churches, and group homes. Therefore the proposed healthcare and professional office uses are a substitution for these transitional uses. There is also a provision in this Growth Management Plan Amendment text that will prohibit any further expansion of the southwest quadrant of this Neighborhood Activity Center. These uses provide significant benefit to the neighborhood and community. He presented a schematic design of a conceptual center on the property which was previously distributed as an example of the site's potential development. As the project is still early in the permitting process, we cannot say that this is what will be built; however, the Walgreen's site is already incorporating an internal access that will connect to the subject parcel from Wilson Blvd, and a joint access from Golden Gate Boulevard is anticipated. The exact location of this access point will have to be worked out with Collier County staff during the next stage of permitting - rezoning. Assuming this petition is approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the next stage will be the rezone process. Another Neighborhood Information Meeting will also be required during the rezone process, which should have much more specific information, like the buildings, setbacks, buffers. He then summarized the current GMP Amendment text and commitments that have been reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the transmittal hearing: a. commercial uses shall be developed in a campus setting and are limited to an urgent care center, medical and professional offices (except surveyors), and medical related uses such as a wellness or physical therapy center b. subsequent rezoning shall provide that 60% of the permitted gross square footage shall be designated for medical and medical related uses and that parking for the entire project shall be provided at a ratio supportive of medical uses (I to 200 or as may be required by the LDC). C. parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards, except for required arterial level lighting at the entries, which may be pole lights d. the neighborhood center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded The scheduled Adoption Hearing dates for this project and other Growth Management Plan Amendments in the 2005 cycle are: CCPC November 15, 2007 BCC December 4, 2007 Opened up for questions and discussion: It should be noted that approximately 15 people from the public attended this meeting. The following were general statements which were offered or general inquiries that were discussed: • Petition process and original Staff Report, Planning Commission Recommendation and Board of County Commissioners vote • Commitment for second NIM due to refinements in plan from listening to community • Schedule for receipt of new Staff Report (approximately 1 week prior to CCPC transmittal hearing) • Overall lessened trips on the road network by providing needed and desired healthcare and professional uses which otherwise would require trips along CR 951 or hmnokalee Road. • Neighbors voiced support for the ideal transitional uses to be located between the Walgreens and the residential neighborhood, uses which will serve the community. • Neighbors believe that the proposed uses would be much more desirable than a church or school. Page 2 of 3 • Linda Hartman, noted that she served on the Golden Gate Master Plan Committee and that the Golden Gate Master Plan would have incorporated the proposed uses as transitional alternatives to those permitted by the Master Plan; churches, schools, etc. and they discussed at the time. • Discussion of possible hours of operation — should be addressed during rezoning process • Water management and utilities — design and location to be addressed in subsequent permitting • The GMP Restrictions relative to design standards in the Golden Gate Estates - already in place; such as architectural, roof material and design, buffers, setback, one -story limitation and similar. • Neighbors happy to have this type of use in the area. • Mark Teaters mentioned that the immediate adjacent property owners have been involved in this process, consulted and all of their concerns have been addressed by the property owner and incorporated into the existing GMPA Text, that has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the State of Florida DCA • Another neighbor thinks this is a wonderful project and is surprised by the amount of time and effort it takes; he is in support of the project continuing to move forward. If we do not support this and it is not approved; that's a step backward. • Overall support for the project. Page 3 of 3 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM / TRANS? IITTAI, OF STAFF RF,OUESTED COPIES OF PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR C13- 2005 -2 / Wilson Boulevard and Golden G -ate Boulevard Neighborhood. Center Document Date. November 6,200-1 Attached is the growth management plan text approved for transmittal by the Board of County Commissioners to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). DCA returned the GMP Cycle Amendments without comment or objection to the proposed CP- 2005 -2 Amendment. Introduction. The petitioner undertook an extensive outreach program to the neighborhood and community subsequent to the first public hearing before the Plamung Commission; and, has listened and made adjustments to the original petition in sensitive consideration of input received. The result was broad support for the proposal, strong public support before Board of County Commissioner's public hearing on the matter; and support from the community at a second Neighborhood Informational Meeting held on October 22, 2007 Transmittal. 'Transmittal of the text to DCA was made after presentation of the text amendment and associated documentation which included supportive signed petitions (copies included in this transmittal), and disclosure of 698 blue response postcards received directly by Commissioner Colletta's office, which overwhelmingly supported the proposed project. We were most pleased at the high response rate of 25% of 2800 letters /postcards mailed, which verified a high neighborhood interest in the project The cards were mailed to land / home owners within a defined geographic service area relative to the site. 1 "his transmittal includes copies of the postcards returned. 95% of the postcards returned favored development. 76% of those returned selected medical or medical and other development; 19% of those rehuned selected other commercial development; and 5% of those returned selected "none" or "no development' 101 Additional testimony 1leard and considered by the Board of t,ounty Commissioners were 11 out of 12 supporting speakers. Copy of the meeting transctipts is included in thi� iransrnittal. The 12th speaker reported Char the Civic Association was divided on the issue. A co(iple: of speakers previously served as members of the Golden Gate Master Plan Subconnrattee which aided in crafting the Ptau which is proposed for amendment, and the), found that the amendment, as proposed, provides an ideal transition to die residential neighborhood comparable to Conditional Uses which are permitted by the Plan Another speaker, Mr. Teaters presented the findings of support frour arguably the most affected, property ov tiers / home.owncrs, which either ahut, or arc in close proximity to the subjeca property, Which held a separate meeting with petitioner repreeentatives- Also enclosed is the Market Study i response to staff comments authored by Mr'. Russ Weyer of Eishkind and Associates and dated .hme. 8, 2007. "According to the Consultant's analysis, there is an itnmediate need for office uses in the 2 -mile market surrounding the project." "The commercial office component of this Project is designed to serve the 2 - -mile trade area's demand for office space. The location provides the access and visibility that are required for this type of development. The under - allocation of suitable office property supports the need for the additional office acreage," You will also fad a letter of support from Robert Boyd Fober, M.D., FACEP, dated March 4, 2007; stating the need for an argent care center in the eastern Golden Gate estates area. Dr. Tober is the Medical Director of the. Neighborhood Health Clinic, Medical Director of the Collier County EMS and Medical Director of the NCII Wound Healing Center & Hyperbaric Oxygen Gnit; all in Naples, Florida. the Board of County Commissioners. ouers, in making the approval for t_ransnuttal., strongly advised the petitioner that they should not snake any changes to the text; advising that it should be the same text to be considered by the Planning Commission _arid in their final consideration, Conclusion. The text amendment will well serve the community, which has embraced the proposal which they aided in crafting. Sincerely, PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ichael K. Fernandez, AICP President Enclosures: Application Exhibits and Base Documents -- twenty (20) copies cc Mr. Michael Corder - Petitioner / Property Owner / Applicant WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS Compiled: October 31, 2007 for CCPC Adoption Hearing PREPARED BY: MICHAEL R. FERNANDEZ, AICP PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED Development Consultants, Engineers, Planners and Landscape Architects 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2, Naples, Florida, 34103 239 / 263 -6934 239 / 263 -6981 fax PDI MRF @ AOL.COM 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 CP- 2005 -2 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER APPLICATION EXHIBITS I. Approved Text per Board of County Commissioners vote of approval at the transmittal hearing dated June 5, 2007 (CP- 2005 -2 GMP Text) (Text transmitted to State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, reviewed and returned with no comment) a. Highlighted version for ease of reference b. Clean copy 11. Transcript of the Meeting of the Board of County Commissioners / June 5, 2007 III. Market Study / Commercial Needs Analysis — Dated June 8, 2007 IV. Traffic Impact Statement — Dated May 2, 2007 V. Letter of Support from Dr. Robert'fober— Dated March 4, 2007 VI. Neighborhood Project Support — Petition Signatures gathered by property owner Copies of original signatures, followed by typed list of names Considered by BCC at June 5, 2007 Transmittal Hearing VII. Project POSTCARD Mailing — Copy of Letter and Postcard Mailing Summary of postcards received / neighborhood opinion results Copies of original postcards received by Commissioner Coletta's office between the dates of April 30 and July 23, 2007 VIII. Additional public submittals made at the Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Submitted and Presented by Mr. Mark Teaters at the BCC Hearing on June 5, 2007 Re: Neighborhood Meeting Held (5/30/07) by Immediately Adjacent Property Owners Invitation Letter, List of Meeting Attendees, and Email Letter of Support WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS I. Approved Text per Board of County Commissioners Voted Approval at BCC Transmittal Hearing - June 5, 2007 Transmitted to DCA — Reviewed and returned with no comments a. Highlighted Version b. Clean Copy GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 Ia. Approved Text per Board of County Commissioners Voted Approval at BCC Transmittal Hearing June 5, 2007 Transmitted to DCA — Reviewed and returned with no comments Highlighted Version GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non - conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Intensifying residential density shall not be permitted. The Estates Designation also accommodates future non - residential uses including: • Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, • Parks, open space and recreational uses, • Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991 and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.01 F.S.). • (1) Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1 -75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: • Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. • Group Care Facility, • Care Units, • Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and • Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. a. Estates -Mixed Use District (VIII)) Residential Estates Subdistrict Single- family residential development may be allowed within the Estates -Mixed Use District at a maximum density of one unit per 2'% gross acres unless the lot is considered a legal non - conforming lot of record. (VI) 2) Neighborhood Center Subdistrict - Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. (VI) a) The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. (111)(V)(VI) b) Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Map 9). The (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 32 centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Four Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: • Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right -of -way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.98 acres in size and consists of Tract 144, Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 1118 acres in size and consists of Tracts 124, 125, and the north n50 feet�if Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. • Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109 -114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Map 11). The E1/2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for -- buffer, water management and open space. • Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 12), The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. • Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center is located in the SW and SE quadrants of the intersection (see Map 13) and the parcels fie east and south of the Fire Station. The portion of the Center lying south of the Fire Station is approximately 5.15 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 47. The southeast quadrant of the Center, lying east of the Fire Station is approximately 4.05 acres in size and consists of Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46. 33 (1)(V)(VI)(VIII) c) Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: • Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C -1, C2, or C -3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991), except as prohibited below. • The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single - family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. • Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (exdddmti*Ne "�Wbk;ildt6M , Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. • A single project shall utilize no more than 50 % of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. • The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. • Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right -of- way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. • Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. • Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. • Projects shall provide a 25 -foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right - of -way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25 -foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25 -foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention /detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 200471 on October 26, 2004 34 • For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road /Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. • All buildings shall have the roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. • Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty - five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • All lighting facilities shall be architecturally - designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty -five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. • Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. • All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. • No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Drive - through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive - through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). • Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E- Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy -five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: 35 (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro -period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. C. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. • Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open -space component. Such public open -space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian - accessible courtyard, as per Section 2.4.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. • The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) Mail Order Houses (5961) Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) Power Laundries (7211) Crematories (7261) (Does not include non - crematory Funeral Parlors) Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) Libraries (8231) Correctional Institutions (9223) Waste Management (9511) Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. M (VII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 RA WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 Ib. Approved Text per Board of County Commissioners Voted Approval at BCC Transmittal Hearing June 5, 2007 Transmitted to DCA — Reviewed and returned with no comments Clean Version GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non- conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Intensifying residential density shall not be permitted. The Estates Designation also accommodates future non - residential uses including: • Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, • Parks, open space and recreational uses, Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991 and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.01 F.S.). • (1) Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1 -75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co-locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: • Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. • Group Care Facility, • Care Units, • Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and • Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. a. Estates -Mixed Use District (VIII)1) Residential Estates Subdistrict - Single - family residential development may be allowed within the Estates -Mixed Use District at a maximum density of one unit per 2% gross acres unless the lot is considered a legal non - conforming lot of record. (VI) 2) Neighborhood Center Subdistrict -Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. (VI) a) The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. (111)(V)(VI) b) Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Map 9). The (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 32 centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Four Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: • Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right -of -way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.98 acres in size and consists of Tract 144, Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 11.78 acres in size and consists of Tracts 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126, Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. • Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109 -114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Map 11). The E1 /2 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. • Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 12). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. • Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center is located in the SW and SE quadrants of the intersection (see Map 13) and the parcels lie east and south of the Fire Station. The portion of the Center lying south of the Fire Station is approximately 5.15 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 47. The southeast quadrant of the Center, lying east of the Fire Station is approximately 4.05 acres in size and consists of Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46. 33 (I)(V)(VI)(VIII) c) Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: • Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C -1, C2, or C -3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991), except as prohibited below. • The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single - family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or fratemal_organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. • Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. • A single project shall utilize no more than 50 % of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. • The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. • Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right -of- way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. • Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. • Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. • Projects shall provide a 25 -foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right - of -way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25 -foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention /detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 1 34 • For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road /Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. • All buildings shall have tile roofs, 'Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. • Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty - five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • All lighting facilities shall be architecturally - designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty -five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. • Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. • All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. • No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Drive - through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive- through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). • Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E- Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: 35 (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro -period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. C. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. • Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open -space component. Such public open -space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian - accessible courtyard, as per Section 2.4.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. • The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) Mail Order Houses (5961) Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) Power Laundries (7211) Crematories (7261) (Does not include non - crematory Funeral Parlors) Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) Libraries (8231) Correctional Institutions (9223) Waste Management (9511) Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. The following are additional restrictions and standards for the development of Tracts 124 and the north 150 feet of Tract 126 within the southwest quadrant of the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. a. Commercial uses shall be developed in a campus setting and are limited to: 1. an urgent care center 2. medical and professional offices; except surveyors 3. medical related uses such as a wellness or physical therapy center b. The subsequent rezoning shall provide that sixty (60 %) percent of the permitted gross square footage shall be designated for medical and medical related uses. And, parking for the entire project shall be provided at a ratio supportive of medical uses; the more restrictive of 1 parking space per 200 square feet or as required by the Land Development Code, enabling 100 percent medical use. c. Parking lot lighting shall be restricted to bollards except as may be required to meet arterial level lighting standards at entries. d. The Neighborhood Center boundaries of this quadrant shall not be further expanded. (VII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 37 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS II. Transcript of the Meeting of the Board of County Commissioners - June 5, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 June 5, 2007 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida, June 5, 2007 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in SPECIAL SESSION for GMP Cycle 5, in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Coletta Tom Henning Frank Halas Fred W. Coyle Donna Fiala ALSO PRESENT: Joseph Schmitt, Administrator for CDES David Weeks, Comprehensive Planning Manager Page I AGENDA June 4, 2007 9:00 am. 2005 Cycle of Growth Management Plan Amendments Transmittal Hearing James Colette, BCC Chairman, District 5 Tom Henning, BCC Vice- Chairman, District 3 Donna Fiala, BCC Commissioner, District 1 Frank Halas, BCC Commissioner District 2 Fred W. Coyle, BCC Commissioner, District 4 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -53, AS AMENDED, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT . NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS." ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. June 4, 2007 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Comprehensive Planning, Growth Management Plan Amendments A. CP- 2005 -2, Petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Mae (GGAMPIFLUM) and Map Series to expand "Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center ", to allow neighborhood commercial of approximately an additional 60,000 square feet, for property located at the SE corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and I" Street SW, in Section 9, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 7t acres. [Coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] B. CP- 2005 -5, Petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and GGAMP Future Land Use Map 1GGAMPlFLUM) and map series to amend the Golden Gate Estates Commercial )nfill Subdistrict, to expand the Subdistrict by 13 acres, allow up to 115.000 square feet of intermediate commercial and general office uses and allow residential uses at 15 dwelling units per acre, for property located at the NW comer of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 18t acres. [Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] C. CP- 2005 -6, Petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map (GGAMP/FLUM) and Map Series to create the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict ", to allow for the expansion and continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and the Church of God, and, to allow additional institutional and related uses, for property located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, specifically, Tracts 43. 50, 59, and 66. Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 16.3= acres. (Coordinator: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner] D. CP- 2006 -4, Petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP ) to modify the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Transitional Conditional Uses provision, to allow a church as a Transitional Conditional Use for the subject site abutting a residential use, for property located on the south side of )mmokalee Road and ±300' east of Oakes Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. consisting of 2.6s acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] E. CP- 2005 -7, Petition requesting amendment to the Future land Use Element (FLUE) to modify "Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict" to add retail uses and increase building square footage from 40,000 to 70,000 feet, for property located at the NW corner of Pine Ridge Road and Livingston Road, in Section 12. Township 49 South. Range 25 East, consisting of 10.47:t acres. (Coordinator: Marcia Kendall, Senior Planner] June 4, 2007 F. CP- 2005 -9, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series to create the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, to allow up to 90,000 square feet of retail, office and personal service uses, for property located at the NW comer of Immokalee Road and Platt Road, in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 8t acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] G. CP- 2005 -10, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series to establish the "Naples Big Cypress Commerce Center Subdistrict", to allow up to 88,110 square feet of general and heavy commercial uses, consistent with the C-4 and C -5 zoning districts of the Land Development Code, for property located at the NW corner of US41 East and Trinity Place, in Section 17, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 9.79± acres. [Coordinator: Michele Moses, AICP, Principal Planner] H. CP- 2005.11, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to change the designation of the site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Receiving Lands to "Rural - Industrial District", to allow for approximately 500,000 square feet of building space for warehouse and manufacturing uses, for property located on the north side of USA I East and 1,000' west of Trinity Place, in Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 42.5± acres. [Coordinator: Tom Greenwood, AICP, Principal Planner] CP- 2005 -12, Petition requesting amendment to the Future and Use Elemen l (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series to create the "North Belle Meade Special Use Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands and North Belle Meade Overlay, to allow earth mining, oil extraction and related processing, asphalt and concrete batch - making plants and their related uses, and all Sending Lands permitted uses, conditional uses and rights as permitted uses, and requesting an amendment to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) to reduce the Preservation and Native Vegetation Retention Standards from 80 percent to 40 percent for this Subdistrict, for property located in Sections 29, 31 and 32, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, consisting of 950± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] CP- 2005 -13, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Ma (FLUM) and Map Series to create the "Collier Boulevard Community Services Subdistrict" for property designated on the Future Land Use Map as Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, to allow up to 368,000 square feet of church - sponsored institutional and residential uses, and allow non-church sponsored residential uses at 4.5 dwelling units per acre, up to 296 market rate and Essential Services Personnel Housing units, for property located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR -951), one -half mile north of Rattlesnake - Hammock Road (within the First Assembly of God PUD site), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, Principal Planner] K. CPSP- 2005 -14, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Mae (FLUM) to re- designate Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral 3 June 4, 2007 Lands or Receiving Lands, for 90 properties located within Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, and Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 26 Fast, and Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 13, 14, 22, 27, 29 and 32, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, and Sections 15 and 21. Township 51 South, Range 27 East, consisting of ±3,606 acres total. [Coordinator: David Weeks, AICP, GMP Planning Manager] L. CPSP - 2005 -15, Petition requesting amendment to the Transportation Element (PEE to add new Policies 3.5, 3.6,3.7 and 3.8, introducing Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plans (TCPPs), Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps (TCPMs), and associated tables and ordinances, to provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future transportation corridors. [Coordinator: Dun Scott, Transportation Planning Director] 3. Adjourn 4 June 4, 2007 June 5, 2007 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the continuation of the June 4th Growth Management Plan amendments BCC hearing. Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: It's going to be our objective today to try to cover as much of the people's business as we possibly can in the time allotted. Any comments from the commissioners about today's meeting or agenda? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yeah, be brilliant, be brief, be gone. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Wow, I love that. Any other commissioners got any other comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Not me. I'm all set. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Fine. Take it away, Mr. Schmitt. MR. SCHMITT: I'm going to turn this -- good morning, I'm Joe Schmitt, your administrator for Community Development/Environmental Services Division. We're here for comprehensive plan amendments, actually amendments dealing with your 2005 and some of the 2006 amendments. I'm going to turn it over to David Weeks, the comprehensive plan manager, and he will give an introduction and describe how we're going to go through today's business and describe what this process will entail. David? MR. WEEKS: Good morning, Commissioners. David Weeks, Planning Manager in the Comprehensive Planning Department. As Joe has just indicated, these are the 2005 cycle of Growth Management Plan amendments, not rezonings, not conditional uses, not those other land use petitions that you deal with on a much more N June 5, 2007 frequent basis. And specifically, this is the first of two sets of public hearings on these petitions. This is known as the transmittal hearing. For those petitions which you choose to transmit today, that is, you approve, if you want to think of it as preliminarily today, they will be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and other state and regional agencies for review, and then they will come back to the county for the second and final hearings, the adoption hearings. So if you choose to approve a petition today for transmittal, you will have a second bite at the apple at the adoption hearings. If you should choose not to transmit a petition today, however, then it is done. It is denied. You're -- you've concluded your review of that petition. As this is a -- the actions today are legislative, not quasijudicial, it is not a requirement to swear in the speakers nor is it required that you make your typical public disclosures. The Planning Commission held hearings on these petitions on March 5th, 22nd, and 29th, and also April 19th, depending on the specific petitions. Their recommendations are reflected in the executive summary. And for those petitions which they recommended approval of, the language they recommended is reflected in the Exhibit A's to the resolutions within your binders. You did vote yesterday, or it was mentioned yesterday, and we want to mention again today, that there is one time certain item, and that is petition CP- 2005 -13. That is for property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard. It is the site of the First Assembly of God PUD. And, again, that's at three o'clock today, time certain. Also at yesterday's hearing, regarding petition CPSP- 2005 -14, pertaining to the redesignation of sending lands in the rural fringe mixed -use district, you continued until your June 22nd hearing one batch of properties identified as map parcels 3 through 11. These are located in the northeast quadrant of the North Belle Meade overlay, Page 3 June 5, 2007 and I believe it's in Section 13, Township 49 south, Range 27 east. Properties are owned by Symphony Real Estate, Limited. We have one change in recommendation for petition CP- 2005 -6, which will be specifically noted when we get to that petition. It is, I'll say, in the applicant's favor, so they're not particularly concerned about, at least broadly, the recommendation. Next to the last item is data and analysis. Commissioners, if you've looked at the staff reports, you've seen that adequate data and analysis has been a consistent theme that staff has raised in these amendments. More particularly, most of these petitions before you, staff has recommended denial of, and one of the issues raised has to do with adequate data and analysis. And this is a requirement that has existed in state law for in the neighborhood of 20 years since the Growth Management Act of 1985 was adopted. The burden is on the applicant to submit data and analysis that is adequate to support the petition. It is not staffs role, it's not county's role, to tell an applicant what to submit. The burden is on the applicant to submit the data and analysis that he or she believes supports the petition, and then, of course, coming before all the hearing bodies to defend that petition, including defending that data and analysis, making their case before you and the other hearing bodies as to why the data and analysis that they have submitted does, in fact, justify approval of their petition. Finally, Commissioners, if we meet our ambitious goal of completing the hearing today, staff would, as usual, ask that you leave your set of three binders available for staff to pick them up to reuse to send to the various state agencies. And Commissioners, with that, we're ready to begin with the first hearing item. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: COMMISSIONER FIALA simple majority? Yes. Commissioner Fiala? Do we need a supermajority or EM June 5, 2007 MR. WEEKS: Simple majority, 3 -2. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Okay. And one more question. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yes. COMMISSIONER FIALA: I've written all over my book. It's okay that you send it up with all of this writing and marks and colors and everything? MR. WEEKS: We'll still take it. We do make a cursory review, and if we find those pages, we'll replace them with clean pages. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Okay. Well, there's lots. MR. WEEKS: That's fine. Because certainly they're yours for your using while you have them. And again, we'll make the changes as we find them. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Thank you. Item #2A PETITION: CP- 2005 -2 MR. WEEKS: And Commissioner, as is your typical protocol, unless you change it today, the petitioner will go first followed by a, as brief as possible, staff presentation. Commissioners, your first item is petition CP- 2005 -2, petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series to expand the Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard neighborhood center to allow neighborhood commercial of approximately 60,000 square feet for property located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and First Street Southwest in Section 9, Township 49 south, Range 27 east, consisting of approximately seven acres. And the agent is Michael Fernandez. MR. FERNANDEZ: Good morning, Commissioners. Michael Fernandez representing Michael Quarter (phonetic), the applicant for Page 5 June 5, 2007 the project. This originally was an expansion of the existing commercial quadrant at Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. It was an expansion of approximately seven acres of general commercial, and as staff has said, an estimated 60,000 square feet. As we started going through the process, which started in 2005 -- it's been a little over two years now -- we've got -- we received a significant amount of community input relative to the proposal that we were making and also an enlightenment that we received about what the needs were of the community, and specifically the neighborhood that this land exists on. The revision that we ultimately made after the Planning Commissioner meeting was one that would -- would -- converted what we had proposed as a commercial development to an office development, the majority of which would be medical use. This was a finding that we made over a period of time, both in respect to community interest and input and also relative to end user input into the process. To this end, we had a number of meetings, post the neighborhood information meeting with the civic association, civic association leadership, meetings with the neighborhood that exists that's in close proximity to the property. We also went the extra mile in soliciting input from the neighborhood. Our client and his family went out to some of the neighborhood areas, for instance, like the library, and took petitions looking for support and actually received -- and we have submitted signed petitions of 227 signatures. More than that, we sent a letter requesting support to what we called our service area, which was approximately 2,800 residential addresses of which we estimate about 50 percent of those actually have homes on them. So approximately 2,800, about 1,400 acres actually occupied, the balance of which are landowners that are either =0 June 5, 2007 going to use them as a future residence or for sale. We received a very significant response over a period of time, and what we received were responses -- we call them response cards. We had sent, in addition to information with the proposed project, a card basically allowed the individual or the family to provide us some input, some guidance, on what they were looking for. To date, as of a couple days ago, those cards had to be returned to the chairman's office, and it was approximately 632 post cards had been received, 95 percent of which supported additional commercial at this location, 75 percent which supported the proposed project, specifically medical, medical - related, and office uses, 33, or about 5 percent, elected to tell us that they didn't want anything or they wanted something else at the site. So we've had -- we've gone really, I think, the extra mile, and that was a lot of work our client undertook to get some good feedback. _ro What I put up here is a quick graphic that shows the relationship of this property to other properties for commercial. Again, it's located at Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson. It's approximately three miles south of Immokalee Road where there's no existing commercial. There's -- it's approximately five miles east of 951, and you'd have to travel an additional mile either south or north to get to commercial. It's about three miles to the west of Everglades, and it's five miles north of I -75. It's one of the most centrally located -- in fact, this was arguably the most centrally located neighborhood center that exists for the Golden Gate Estates area. And, in fact, it's the only commercial center or node that is identified in the Golden Gate Master Plan within this area. Currently, there are -- there's four quadrants at this intersection. The southeast quadrant is under construction right now, and it's being developed as a commercial retail center with restaurants. The southwest corner has been approved for a rezoning. It's now owned by Walgreen's. They've submitted an SDP and we would assume that Page 7 June 5, 2007 the Walgreen's is going to go forward. They're in the process recently, as of last week, made a second submittal. I'm on the northeast corner is G's Store with some accessory uses, and they have approximately two additional acres that they have available to them to expand those uses. So although in your staff report under information about market analysis it says that there's 16.3 acres, really the only quadrant that has land available to them is the northwest quadrant, and that's 5.3 acres, of which one acre of that is right -of -way. So there's about 4.2 acres. Market conditions would suggest that the highest and best use of those properties will be expanding the commercial out there and not as an office or a medical center, which tends to be less intensive. Probably the most predominant concern that we heard from the very inception of this submittal to -- as late as last week, is concern that this was going to be just the first step in expansion of commercial in the area, and it's a legitimate concern; however, we found a way that we believe has addressed that. Specifically, this land, as it exists today, is already designated with the opportunity for conditional use. So because there's an adjacent neighborhood center that's zoned commercial already, we're able to go and seek conditional uses both to the west of that property and also to the south of the property. What we've done in revising our text is eliminated that opportunity and substituted it with the text that we've proposed, and that text that we've proposed would allow just a limited number of uses; an urgent care center, medical and medical related, and general office. Those uses are approximately 40 percent as intensive as general commercial as far as transportation. We submitted additional documentation to staff from our traffic analysis consultants, and you can see the difference. And 45,000 square feet would have produced a little over 4,000 trips. The proposed, if it's 100 percent medical, June 5, 2007 would be a little over 1,600 trips. So that's a significant reduction. Now, you also note that that analysis is based on 45,000 to 4500. If you considered that the original proposal of 60,000, as staff had indicated, we're about 30 percent of the traffic generation that had been originally proposed. Therefore, we would suggest to you that this is essentially a very good transition to the neighborhood. And in fact, what it is is a recognized transition in that the office uses are consistent with the C -1 zoning district uses, which would essentially be uses that have been found to be transitionary from more intensive commercial to residential neighborhood use being an appropriate transition. As we've met each succeeding meeting with the neighborhood, I think we've garnered additional support. And as of last week, we had one last meeting with the immediate neighborhood, and in that immediate neighborhood that were a few additional items that they _ requested or that we discussed and committed to. And we have provided a copy of that text to staff. And I'll go over those minor changes to you right now, all of them which are more restrictive than had been originally proposed. Essentially, the added additional language was that there was some concern that although we're saying this is going to be a medical and office center, there was a concern that there was not a commitment to that medical, that it could be 100 percent general office. The neighborhood has told us, our cards have told us that there's a need for medical, and so we made a further commitment saying that the majority of the office space that's approved in the zoning would have to be medical related or -- medical or medical related, so that over 50 percent of it will be in that land use. Second, we were discussing it as a transitionary use. And as appropriate for transitionary uses, we made a commitment that we would not use pole lights. In other words, right now the Golden Gate June 5, 2007 Master Plan allows for pole lights of 25 feet, which is -- creates a light cloud. And essentially what we've agreed to is the utilization of bollards. Those -- one additional use that they asked us to remove from that list of uses, and that was surveyors, because of the truck component, and that was reviewing a list of C -1 uses for general office. And then finally, we made one additional commitment that's not in the text, and that is that we would hold an additional non - required neighborhood information meeting. Because that language has changed over a period of time, they believe, and we believe -- we agree with them -- that it would be appropriate to hold another neighborhood informational meeting. That neighborhood informational meeting would be held prior to the adoption hearings that would occur this fall. That would give an opportunity for them to hear -- the neighborhood to hear and make sure that they're apprised of these changes that have been proposed. In addition to that, keep in mind -- and, David, correct me if I'm wrong, but the Planning Commissioners will also see these petitions once again. The Planning Commission, of course, did not have the -- didn't have the review of this particular text proposal, which is significantly transitioned to a less -- more restrictive, less intense use. And that would -- and then it would come again before you. A couple other points that I wish to stress. We have in our submittal, for support to the neighborhood, given them a site plan, a conceptual site plan, of the proposed uses, and we've shown the adjacent Walgreen's. We have shown them how that would interconnect. And we've received additional feedback. And, of course, we're willing to work with that once we get to the rezoning stage of the project. With that, I'd be happy to answer any questions you may have relative to the proposed project, its intensity, any of the support Page 10 June 5, 2007 documentation that we've provided over a period of time, and address any questions that staff may have relative to our proposal. We'd also like to reserve the ability to come back to you here shortly to discuss any input that comes from either staff or from the general public. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. FERNANDEZ: With that, any questions? CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you, Mr. Fernandez. What I'm going to suggest to my fellow commissioners is that we may want to listen to staff s presentation, outline our questions, and then come back at one time and ask the questions and have them bounce back between you and our own staff. MR. FERNANDEZ: Very good, sir. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay, sir? Thank you very much. Commissioner Henning, is that all right with you? COMMISSIONER HENNING: That's absolutely wonderful. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. GREENWOOD`. Good morning, Commissioners. Tom Greenwood with Comprehensive Planning, for the record. I was the staffer who attended the neighborhood information meeting in January on this particular issue, and the issue had to do with expanding the neighborhood center, as Mr. Fernandez has stated. If you look at page 12 of the staff report, it's a summary, bullet point summary, of the comments that were received. Sorry about that. The -- this is a capsule or a summary of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The midterm and the long -range plan for Golden Gate somewhat represents what has happened in the past. The area's platted out at 2.25 -acre lots, which is a very low density. The decision to create neighborhood centers was established back in 2004 when the plan was adopted. Neighborhood centers, by definition, are intended to serve an area within a two -mile radius. There are basically -- this was not mentioned by the petitioner. Page 11 June 5, 2007 There is a neighborhood center at the corner of Wilson and Golden Gate. There's also another one at Everglades and Golden Gate. That center is three miles east of the center in question. The two -mile service radius of those two centers obviously would overlap, okay. There is also existing and committed development at Orangetree, which is approximately three and a half miles to the north in the Immokalee Road area. To give you a sense of that two -mile radius, which full buildout would be -- and this is using the existing density -- it would be approximately 3,500 dwelling units, and that might be on the high side because part of that two -mile radius goes south into the lower density North Belle Meade area. At a 2.39 population per dwelling unit, about 8,500 people. Again, there is an overlap between the services provided and that will be provided at Orangetree and services that will be provided some day at the Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevard center. This is a very generalized layout of what the center might look like. And, again, I say it's generalized. It's not to scale. The -- the area that's in red, the bold line, represents the current boundary of the center, and as the petitioner's very clearly indicated, the southeast corner is under construction and it's under construction within the existing boundary of the existing center. There were no changes made for that center. And again, as the applicant has indicated, the southwest quadrant is owned by Walgreen's. The crosshatched area, which is about seven acres, the other one crosshatched is the area that is proposed to be expanded. How the text is changed, if it is changed, the bottom line when the day is over with, the center will physically be expanded if this project proceeds. The executive summary is fairly clear. Quite frankly, I received personally -- and I think Mr. Weeks did as well -- probably about, I don't know, maybe 100, 150 pages of unsolicited emails. We made Page 12 June 5, 2007 copies. Many of those pages include signatures of people that are apparently in support of commercial or office. We're not quite sure which, what their intent was when they signed the petition, and that information I have as a matter of public record. The text amendment that was submitted to you as a part of this hearing is different than what the Planning Commission heard. And as the petitioner indicated, staff has received his most recent proposed text amendment. By most recent I mean I received it at 8:55 this morning, about five minutes before the meeting started. I have not had a chance to review it. Obviously the petitioner would know that. The real issue -- and I'll just very -- touch on a few points, a few points. One of the things in the executive summary was the fact that there was an application in the 2006 cycle for some mixed development on the north side of Golden Gate, again, in an area that is in the master plan for low density residential. What is decided eventually to -- whether to expand or not expand this center will and could have an impact on future decision making is the boundary that's proposed there, a good permanent boundary. I guess that's a question we have to ask. If that boundary is changed as proposed, what impact will it have on future decision making? The applicant indicated that the northwest corner of this quadrant's available for development. It is. And it appears there's some acreage available for development in the northeast quadrant of this intersection as well. In closing, staff has not received anything from the applicant that would alter its recommendation, and that is not to transmit. I don't know if the Planning Commission, if it reheard this, if it would change its mind and vote in favor of this amendment. We have not had any further discussions with any of the property owners in the area. In conclusion, basically, our staff report and recommendation stands and it represents the feelings and wishes of the Planning Commission when they heard this matter in March. Thank you. Page 13 June 5, 2007 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Mr. Greenwood? MR. GREENWOOD: Yes. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: A question, sir. Now, if this is transmitted and it -- it would still have to come back to the Planning Commission and it would still have to come back to this commission? MR. GREENWOOD: That's correct. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: At that point in time, would -- if it did go to that particular phase, would staff be able to weigh back in with the new data that they got? MR. GREENWOOD: I think we would certainly consider that. That's new information that was submitted after the application was filed. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Thank you. I have some questions, but mainly for Mr. Fernandez. But Mr. Greenwood, while you're there, the Golden Gate Master Plan allows for transitional conditional uses? MR. GREENWOOD: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER HENNING: This quadrant of commercial designation, does that provide for that transitional conditional? MR. GREENWOOD: The language that's being proposed -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: No. MR. GREENWOOD: Oh, I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Just in general in the Growth Management Plan. MR. GREENWOOD: It does, it does. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So in the Growth Management Plan it says adjacent to. This property here, what I would consider would be adjacent to. That would be the transitional conditional. Would that be a loss of opportunity for that conditional use? Since it's -- or would you expand that conditional use application further out? Page 14 June 5, 2007 MR. WEEKS: Commissioner, you're correct that the opportunity for transitional conditional use, as proposed by the applicant, would be lost. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. So they can't expand on the other side of the road then, I think that's -- what's that, First? Whatever that road it going north and south. MR. WEEKS: You cannot cross a street. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. All right, all right. MR. WEEKS: So by expanding the activity center as being proposed, the subject properties presently would be eligible for transitional conditional use but would no longer be allowed if this is approved as proposed. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. One thing that the master plan committee, I thought, was -- done wisely, was provide a shared interconnecting road to get away from that -- that interchange, kind of like a loop around the activity center. What would -- would that be a requirement under this condition or this proposed amendment? MR. WEEKS: It is not. That would only be if this commission requires it. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. What would be the requirement for buffering? Because you used to have more intensive uses at the intersection with a conditioning down with less intensive uses such as churches and day cares and that. What would be -- since it's such a deviation, what would be the softening effect to the neighborhood? MR. WEEKS: The properties adjacent to the south of the subject site would still be subject to the 75 -foot setback and the buffering requirements that apply to all neighborhood centers. I believe the -- to the west that would not be the case, I believe, because it's abutting a street, not abutting an -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. _ MR. WEEKS: -- Estates property. Page 15 June 5, 2007 COMMISSIONER HENNING: What -- my last question, what would you consider the access for this -- if the board adopts, what would be the access for this increase of intensity? MR. WEEKS: That would be -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: Would it be on First or would it be, where? MR. WEEKS: That would be determined at the time of zoning typically. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. But you'd still have to go by the intent of the Growth Management Plan, correct? MR. WEEKS: Yes. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Because really you're throwing everything out the window because -- the language provides that conditional use transformation, which is now lost, and in that transformation it was supposed to be a shared interconnection, a shared parking. MR. WEEKS: Those requirements would not exist because the -- the only abutting property, that being the one to the south from this expanded area, would be limited to single- family residential use. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. MR. WEEKS: Of course, you would not have interconnections or shared parking, that's true. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I just had some questions for the -- Mr. Fernandez. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Go ahead. MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Mr. Fernandez, you say you started the process in 2005? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Was that the application? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER HENNING: What month was that? Page 16 June 5, 2007 MR. FERNANDEZ: 1 believe that's April of 2005. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. When did you start working on this proposal? MR. FERNANDEZ: We started working on that proposal, I believe, in the fall of 2004. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So that was just after the board adopted the new amendment to the Growth Management Plan? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. There was no thought at that time to go to the -- commit to that whole process, which the board agreed to reconvened that committee, to ask for the consideration that you're asking today? MR. FERNANDEZ: We weren't hired at that time, sir, but we have since then, of course, gone through a fairly rigorous process of public involvement relative to both civic association -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: Okay. MR. FERNANDEZ: -- and neighborhood. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Your client never participated in the hearings, the public meetings that the committee, Growth Management Plan Committee, took place in the -- I believe it was 2002,2001? MR. FERNANDEZ: No, sir. But I believe some of the supporters that you'll hear from were a part of that effort. COMMISSIONER HENNING: That's fine. MR. FERNANDEZ: Okay. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So I won't find any -- find any sign -up sheets during that process of the owner or the previous owner during that public hearings, public meetings? MR. FERNANDEZ: Not that I'm aware of, no, sir. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: You're welcome. Commissioner Halas? Page 17 June 5, 2007 COMMISSIONER HALAS: Yes. This is for staff. I'm reading the information that was provided to me. Some of the things that came up was the intensity that's going to take place presently if we don't go through the rezone, and that is the four quadrants. How are we going to maintain an impact of this nature in this particular area without even thinking about the rezone as far as sewer and water? It presently isn't out there. So how are we going to maintain -- how are they going to be able to maintain those type of facilities? MR. GREENWOOD: Well, the area's not served by potable water, municipal sewer, and that will stay the same. I guess the longer term question is, is will this type of change to the master plan result in other changes? And the same issues will come up, potable water, sanitary sewer, for that intersection. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Especially now that the petitioner has changed his venue in regards to what he's going to put there. Now he's talking about medical. And I'm concerned about medical waste and putting it into a septic system, and then from there, leaching into the ground. And, of course, there's a number of wells out in that area. So I have some concerns of that magnitude. So -- and I'm trying to figure out what the overall density is going to be just in this quadrant of neighborhoods. I think we've got about, what do they say, 16 or 18 acres there that presently is -- could be possibly developed or is under development, and now we want to increase that area of development to impact even -- the area more with commercial, and we don't have the adequate facilities to take care -- to address the concerns that we have there? MR. GREENWOOD: Staff agrees, that is an issue. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. MR. GREENWOOD: And seven additional acres may lead to additional acreage in the future at that intersection should this be June 5, 2007 transmitted. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. That's my concern is the -- is potable water and sewer lines. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Coyle? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah, if you'd leave that map there, please. I'd like to clarify something with respect to the transitional conditional uses. Do I understand you correctly to say if this petition were to be approved then the transitional conditional opportunities would be lost to anyone in the property north of Golden Gate Boulevard? MR. GREENWOOD: The document that you received, it indicates excluding the southwest quadrant from conditional uses. Is that your read, David? MR. WEEKS: Yes. MR. GREENWOOD: Yes. MR. WEEKS: Southwest quadrant only -- MR. GREENWOOD: Only. MR. WEEKS: -- would be prohibitive for transitional conditional uses. Those properties north of Golden Gate Boulevard or east of Wilson Boulevard would still be eligible. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Still remain, okay. Then I misunderstood what you'd said earlier. I would just like to express a brief concern about some of the staff s comments here. One, you say that the market study -- the concern the staff has about the market study is that it apparently fails to include 16.3 acres within the northwest, southwest, and southeast quadrants. That's fairly equivocal language. You should be able to determine whether it does or does not. The first question is, is that a weakness of the petitioner's submittal or is it the staff s failure to clearly identify? And then the staff goes on and says further in this paragraph, staff suspects the trade area should be larger than the stated two miles. Page 19 June 5, 2007 I mean, is it -- should it be two miles or should it not be two miles? I guess I'm looking for a specific statement with some proof or substantive justification for making those kinds of comments. It just leaves me with a feeling that either the late submission -- well, no. Let me withdraw that. That can't be the case here because this is the executive summary that was prepared some time back, so you had adequate opportunity to review this. I'm just a little concerned about the equivocal language here. I would like to see something a little more clear. But that having been said, I also am concerned that this particular proposal has not been heard by the CCPC and that there hasn't been a neighborhood information meeting concerning this. And I understand that the petitioner would be willing to do that if we forwarded this for approval. What rights or opportunities are forfeited if we do forward it to DCA with the intention of bringing it back through the CCPC later? MR. WEEKS: Commissioner, as stated earlier, this would come back for that second bite of the apple. In your case, you'd be seeing presumably the same petition for the second time. For the Planning Commission, they would be seeing it for the first time. I don't think they -- I don't think any rights are lost. Everyone does get -- I mean, that's the policy decision for this body to make. Do you wish to say, this is not appropriate to have such substantial changes made post NIM, post CCPC, or alternatively to say, well, because there will be that second bite of the apple, nothing is really lost, everyone will get that second chance, most particularly because a second NIM will be held and, in fact, is required to be held. The Land Development Code says if substantial changes are made to the application after transmittal. Well, this isn't after. These substantial changes occurred prior. But as a staff member, I would say that we require that NIM to be held prior to the adoption hearing. So in short, I don't think any rights are lost, Commissioner. Page 20 June 5, 2007 COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. Then the final question is to ask you for a general appraisal of the concept. We have always talked about the shortage or concern about commercial opportunities in the Golden Gate Estates area. Is it the staffs position that no additional acreage is necessary in the Golden Gate Estates area beyond those neighborhood centers that have already been designated? MR. WEEKS: No, sir. Staffs position is that we believe it may be premature to be approving additional commercial east of 951 while we are in the process of conducting the East of 951 Horizon Study. The end result of that may well be, yes, we need more commercial within the various areas east of 951, including specifically within Golden Gate Estates. Our position is we should wait to find out what the results of that -- that study are. And if we do, in fact, need more commercial, where should it be? What magnitude should it be? For example, they're proposing office type uses only. Should that be the case in certain areas? Should higher intensity zoning such as all the way up to C -5 be allowed in some areas? We just don't believe we're there yet, we're ready to make that decision. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Would that same response apply to most of the petitions that are in our packet today? MR. WEEKS: Yes, sir, and you'll see that same comment in the staff report about the prematurity. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. Thank you very much. MR. WEEKS: Commissioner, if I may briefly respond to the first two points you made. First regarding the apparent lack of inclusion of certain acreages. I think it was 16 or so acres. The reason for that is because the additional market study information provided to staff did not include the inventory, did not include the specifics of what properties were included. It was more of a conclusion, with some explanation certainly, but we did not have the specific inventory, that's why staff said it appears that those properties were not included Page 21 June 5, 2007 based upon certain statements made and what was submitted. Secondly, staff did not do a detailed analysis of this revised submittal. That's why we've made -- I personally made that comment. I suspect that an additional larger trade area should be included. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. Does that conclude what you have, Commissioner? COMMISSIONER COYLE: (No verbal response.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yeah, Mr. Greenwood, a couple questions. It was brought up about the lack of sewer and water, utilities in the area. At the present time such places as G's, I believe the school on Golden Gate Boulevard, a couple of other locations out there that are commercial are using package plants; is that correct? MR. GREENWOOD: I'm not sure of that. MR. WEEKS: G's, I believe, is on a septic tank and well. The school -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yeah, well -- right. But still, they have a way of processing it. And also too, I know the school system, which quite surprised me, was the Max Hasse Park, in the back of it, I looked over at the -- what is that, Big Cypress, the school that's over there? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yes. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Big Cypress. I seen a package plant back there. I thought for sure they were on the sewer and water. So obviously there's ways that they do handle this. One of my concerns is, is if we ever make it a requirement for any commercial going out in that area that they have sewer and water hookup to utility, my concern is that that -- if we do that, we're going to force everyone along that utility line to have to hook up under our laws and ordinances. And so, of course, I don't think at any point in time we're ever going to be supportive of forcing a particular area in the middle of Golden Gate Estates to have sewer and water and then forcing every Page 22 June 5, 2007 single residence that's on the transmissional lines to have to hook up. So I mean, it's not a goal that I ever want to see that we're going to require sewer and water to these facilities to be able to make that a criteria for any kind of development. If we did that, we'd be doing great harm to the people that live out there in Golden Gate Estates. That's my own take on that. I do think that there's package plants out there that they put together that do an adequate job of handling -- it's expensive. I mean, you have to devote a tremendous amount of land to it, which has a side benefit, what they -- when they have to do that, that there's going to be certain green areas that would not be present if you did have sewer and, water, so that's something we have to keep in mind at all times. The East of 951 Study, Mr. Schmitt, I'm going to address this to you. You know, we're not talking about a master plan. We're talking about a survey that's taken place over a period of time. Is this something like a master plan that's supposed to be put together to be able to give us guidance as far as growth management rules go? MR. SCHMITT: Commissioner, it will be basically two phases. This first phase is nothing more, as I'm sure you're aware, but for the other commissioners, an assessment of what the residents are looking for out there and what they believe they want and how they want to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, now wait a minute. Be careful, because this is one of the things that the Horizon Study takes great offense with, because when we keep referencing to Golden Gate Estates, the Horizon. It's not. It's east of 951. It's a global effort that covers the whole area. MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: So I mean, the rules that we're talking about with this, if we were to apply it, we, in effect, would say, no new development till the Horizon Study's done east of 951. Would Page 23 June 5, 2007 that be a clear assumption of where we're going with this? Immokalee should put everything on hold as far as their particular growth management plans go as far as everything that's taken place there. They've got a master plan underway. They should wait also until the East of 951 Study is done? MR. SCHMITT: That is not our intent, and that's -- our only concern in this one was explaining that certainly the preponderance of the issues that they're addressing out there are dealing with the Estates. But as you've just said, this is not only the Estates. It's everything east of 951. And the other piece that we're also working on is the interactive growth model, which we hired a consultant to look at land use, land use activities, and supporting facilities to support population growth east of 951, and that includes, of course, all the way to Immokalee, the special districts -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: When would that study be done? MR. SCHMITT: We -- it's evolving, but certainly the Horizon Committee, I do not believe you'll see anything until sometime in the spring when they come back and actually make their first report back to you. We're looking at the fall, but we've also hired a consultant to do -- basically to go out and canvass residents for input on what they believe and to provide that information to the committee as well. It's moving along and there are meetings, but this is in control that have Horizon Committee. It's something that staff is not really -- we're pushing it, but we're only pushing it so far. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Sure, I understand. And it's doing -- it's a great -- MR. SCHMITT: They're doing a great job. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: We got out there to be able to come up with something that interconnects everything together and makes total sense. Commissioner Fiala? Page 24 June 5, 2007 COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yes. As everybody's aware my major concern is always the road system. And it was quite alarming to me to read here that the growth rate on Golden Gate Boulevard has exceeded 10 percent in the last three years and is -- and Golden Gate Boulevard is expected to be deficient in 2008. It is anticipated that the completion of Vanderbilt Beach Road extension will possibly, I guess, mitigate some of that. But the conclusion is that the additional 45,000 square feet of commercial is not consistent with policy 5.1 of the transportation element of the GMP. And right now, as I'm fully aware, Golden Gate Boulevard is a mass of transportation issues mainly because of the congestion on that road, and I'm concerned about increasing the congestion on that road by additional commercial. So I'll just put that on the record. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Halas? COMMISSIONER HALAS: Yeah. You touched briefly on this, Commissioner, in regards to the East of 951 Study. I think we need to find out what's going on. I think this is way too premature. The other thing that bothers me is where this was heard by the Planning Commission, and then what we're hearing here is basically a change of spots on the leopard. And I have some concerns on that. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: How many speakers do we have? MS. KENDALL: We have 12 speakers. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Why don't we go to the speakers at this time. MS. KENDALL: Okay. We'll begin with Jon Irwin, followed by Paula Bonar. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Now, do you know how to work that machine? MS. KENDALL: Yes. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: We've got a three - minute time for each person. And when you come up, please, if you'd be so kind to state your name for the record. You can use either podium. Page 25 June 5, 2007 MR. SCHMITT: And speakers, I would ask the second speaker announced, would they be ready to come up and start speaking. MS. KENDALL: Paula Bonar. MR. IRWIN: Good morning. My name's Jon Irwin. I have three acres just -- Immokalee Road and Wilson, 2680 2nd Street Northwest. Haven't really built out there. We've owned the property for about four years. We're kind of waiting for more stuff to be happening out there that's closer to us, retail, medical. Just more -- we have two small children, and it's out there. It's a drive. If they need any medical attention, with all the traffic on Immokalee Road, we were just -- like to see more stuff going on out in that area, and I think a medical facility closer in that area will benefit a lot of people. That's it. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you, sir. MR. IRWIN: Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: You can call the next speaker also so they're ready and on -line. MS. KENDALL: Okay. That would be Linda Hartman, followed by Mark Teaters. MS. BONAR: Hi. I'm Paula Bonar. I live off of Webber, and part of my concern was the fact that traffic won't be coming so close to 951 /Collier Boulevard, Immokalee, because the more commercial places that you have out in the Estates, the less traffic it will create for people having to come into town, this far into town. My son goes to Big Cypress. And having a medical facility that close to his school for the next five years would be something I would -- definitely be positive. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you very much. Ms. Hartman? MS. HARTMAN: Good morning, Commissioners. Linda Hartman. I was the vice -chair of the Master Plan Committee, and I'm also the vice -chair of the Horizon Committee. Boy, you guys confused me. You threw me for a loop with that Page 26 June 5, 2007 Horizon, what you think we're responsible for, because we didn't think we were changing any master plans. MR. SCHMITT: That will eventually come, but as part of the process. The first piece is looking at where you want to go, and it depends -- if it does involve a master plan change, that certainly would have to take place. MS. HARTMAN: But we're for the whole east of 951, not just the Estates. MR. SCHMITT: That's right. MS. HARTMAN: It's all the growth. What we're trying to do, we thought, was assess the -- what the growth's going to be out there and what the needs are going to be -- MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. MS. HARTMAN: -- is what I come up with. So - just so, you know, don't throw more at us than we have said we're going to do out there. While I was on the Master Plan Committee, we tried to -- actually we were thinking of putting more neighborhood centers in because the people out there kept coming to us and saying, we need more things. You know, we live way out there. We don't want to go all the way in town. But any -- anything that we plan to make, any new neighborhood centers, was always put down because, you know, it's a really beautiful residential area, and they didn't want anything near their houses. We want it, but not next door to me, issue. But -- so what we came up with was that on the side of the commercial -- you know, the neighborhood center, we had this transitional use which, at the time, I don't know if any of us even thought of medical. And that is low impact on transitional use. And everybody I've spoken to has thought, wow, wouldn't it be great if I could take my kids to the doctor during the day instead of going out -- all the way out in town. And then they were talking about -- we thought medical, wow. Medical would be wonderful out there. Page 27 June 5, 2007 And I find myself, that that seems to be less impact on the neighborhood than even a church might even have. And I love the idea that they're talking about -- they've been talking to everybody out there in the Estates. I've never seen a developer -- and the other ones have -- some of them have worked with us, but these developers seem to work with us far more than most of them have. They've really made an effort to get in touch with the neighbors. And I've attended many meetings on it, and I like the idea of -- transitional use to me is low impact and it seems to me that that medical fits in there, and it saves road trips, which -- and -- because people are going along the Boulevard all the time anyway because right now it's the only way to go, so they're out there anyway, so it'd be easy to zoom in there and take care of your medical. And so, to me, it is low impact. And, personally, I'm really in favor, and a bunch of people that I know also, also feel the same way, so -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MS. HARTMAN: -- that's it. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Mr. Teaters? MR. TEATERS: Good morning, Commissioners. Thanks for having me today. As you know, Golden Gate Estates -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Your name for the record? MR. TEATERS: Oh, Mark Teaters. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. TEATERS: I, likewise, am on the East of 951 Horizon Study, and I was confused as well, but we'll deal with that later. As you know, Golden Gate Estates is growing, and many, many people out there want services in the Estates. My situation is a little different in that I'm directly impacted by this property, by this project, proposed project. I live almost right across the street from where the lot is -- where land is going to be -- there's an L shape. Part of the Page 28 June 5, 2007 land goes between First and Wilson Boulevard, and I can see it from the front of my house. There's some benefits to this project for our neighborhood. Now, we had a neighborhood meeting; a bunch of us that have had a group in the neighborhood for the last couple years got together last Wednesday. And I have some information here for you on the attendees who showed up. We actually had Linda Hartman come to ask -- answer questions on behalf of the Master Plan Committee. We had the petitioner and his engineer there, and we had a group of people from the neighborhood. It was advertised. We put out fliers to the people that lived there that were immediately impacted, the folks that live on Wilson and the folks that live on First because we wanted to know for sure what everybody's thoughts were. We didn't have 10 residents, 10 actual residents show up, which is par for the course. Those are the people that normally show up for those. The benefits for this is the buffer that's going to go across. The bottom's going to be 100 feet, the bottom, the L shape between Wilson and First, that will not be developed. It will be either water retention or buffer, and it's going to protect us, not only from this project, but we won't be able to see the back -- as a neighborhood, we won't be able to see the back of Walgreen's either or what they're doing. So it's going to protect us all the way across. Local services for residents. Low impact businesses. Reduce trips going into town. The one lady said earlier, you know, the people going into town. I talked to Commissioner Henning many times about the need for more business to the east so that people would go to the east instead of the west. The concerns the folks had were the water issues. We're going to have three major projects in the area that we're going to have to deal with the water. You know, we have flooding in our area with our neighbors. Our houses have been -- look like moats around the house. Page 29 June 5, 2007 Roads, the traffic. Commissioner Fiala, to your point. Landscaping buffer that's going to be dealt with in the future. The lighting was addressed by the petitioner, and also getting rid of the things such as surveyors with truck fleets and things like that. I think that the uses for this property, it's -- from what I heard from the neighbors, the uses for this property being a conditional transitional property, the uses that they're proposing are much, much better for our community and for our neighborhood than would be a church who would be open who knows when, and I think that there's a benefit here for us as a neighborhood. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you, Mr. Teaters. MR. TEATERS: Copy of this? CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Leave it right with the court reporter. MR. TEATERS: Absolutely. MS. KENDALL: The next speaker is Pat Humphries, followed by Winnie Apperson. MS. HUMPHRIES: My name is Pat Humphries. I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates since 1992. 1 live three miles from the subject project. I was on the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association board of directors for 10 years and served on all the committees that addressed shopping centers in the Estates. The owner of the property has gone to great lengths to make his project compatible with the neighbors and the Golden Gate Master Plan, so I do not have an objection to it. A medical facility would be an appropriate addition to that location. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MS. APPERSON: Good morning, Commissioners. My name is Winnie Apperson. I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates and I'm also a realtor. Being a resident, my desire to have other services, medical especially -- I have a grandson with asthma who spends the night with Page 30 June 5, 2007 us all the time because we love him to death, and we have had to take him to North Collier Hospital which, in the panic of asthma, is very frightful Being a realtor, I sell -- help a lot of residents sell homes or buy homes out there. And one of -- a lot of my complaints are, I have people listing their houses to sell because of the inconvenience and the cost of living so far out for goods and services. And I find it discouraging because -- the Estates is beautiful and I love it out there, but I also feel that living out there, we shouldn't be kind of -- I wouldn't say punished, but neglected from goods and services that we could really use. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. Next speaker? MS. KENDALL: Next speaker is Meghan Bedell followed by Jeff Polen. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Jeff, if you position yourself to be ready to go, we'd appreciate it. MS. BEDELL: Hi. My name's Meghan Bedell and I'm a homeowner on Wilson Boulevard, and I support this project because I have two small children and I think it would be a great benefit for us to have the medical services close by, and I think it's a great inconvenience to have to drive far out into the city, and I think this would be great for the area. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Next speaker would be after the gentleman that's up there now. MS. KENDALL: Mary Ann Glatt and Scott Barham. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. POLEN: Good morning, Commissioners. My name is Jeff Polen. I'm a resident of the Estates. Everybody that preceded me pretty much said exactly the same thing I was going to say, so I'm not going to take time repeating everybody. I do believe that I can -- I can't understand how it could not be anything but a positive for our area. Personally, I've had three heart Page 31 June 5, 2007 attacks. I got a defibrillator, and the sooner -- if something happens to this machine, the soon I get to a doctor, the much more comfortable I feel. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Thank you. MS. GLATT: Good morning, Commissioners. For the record, my name is Mary Ann Glatt. I am here today to support this project because I believe it is a benefit to this community for the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. BARHAM: Good morning, Commissioners. My name is Scott Barham, and I'm a Collier County schoolteacher and long -time Golden Gate Estates resident. I believe that this project is beneficial and very much needed by our community. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MS. KENDALL: The last two speakers, Tim Nance and Christina Farlow. MR. NANCE: Commissioners, Tim Nance. I'm the current president of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association. The petitioner's representative attended and presented a proposal before the Estates Civic Association. The membership in attendance there were sharply divided of whether they supported or opposed the development. The ones that supported it obviously supported it because -- ostensibly because it's been presented as offering some healthcare benefits. The ones that had objections had objections because they thought that it was a portend badly for additional commercial development in the Estates. Golden Gate Estates represents about 3.7 percent of the area of Collier County. And although -- the individual commissioners may or may not know it, but in the past year, there have been 12 public information meetings proposing plan amendments that would have suggested more commercial in Golden Gate Estates. Page 32 June 5, 2007 So I hope regardless of the way the commissioners vote, please be aware that the Golden Gate Master Plan was a study over 20 months, many, many meetings, and there are many concerns that Golden Gate Estates remain rural and residential. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Mr. Nance, I'm sorry. I didn't mean to interrupt you, but I was at that meeting, and you took a count of what that vote was, and that may be helpful, and also there was suggestions of where would be what they thought was a more appropriate location for this. Would you share that with the commission? MR. NANCE: Well, there was a little discussion. There was only about -- I think there was 35 members in attendance at the time. I think 14 people, including the representative of the petitioner, voted in favor of it, and 21 members voted against it. And those were the reasons. I think one thing that was brought up was that there was a Naples community healthcare proposal of 40,000 square feet of medical that's currently being advertised at the corner of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, what I was trying to get at is, one of the proposals was -- is that they thought it might be - a more appropriate place would be Belle Meade? MR. NANCE: A proposal -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Whoever stated that is the fact that they thought it would be more appropriate, that a medical center should be in Belle Meade. I just wanted to get that on the record. MR. NANCE: Well, I don't remember that, Commissioner. But, I mean, it could have been. Could have been. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yeah, Mr. Smith, who isn't here today -- Richard Smith, and there was a couple other people that commented. Page 33 June 5, 2007 MR. NANCE: Yeah, I thought Richard was going to come, but I don't see him today. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: He might still get here. MR. NANCE: Yeah, he might. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Once again, we thank you very much for your time and your service that you give to your community. MR. NANCE: Thank you. MS. FARLOW: Good morning. My name is Christina Farlow, and I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates. 1, unlike most of the other speakers, live in the northeast section on Randall Boulevard off of Immokalee. That neighborhood consists of six gated communities with more coming, four schools within three miles of my house, and thousands of homes. We all clog up your roadways driving into Naples to go to doctors' appointments, dentists' appointments, and emergency rooms. Also, we have these schools in our area, and the idea that we have thousands of homes and schools with no medical area whatsoever in that area is remarkable. I would like to see medical care available if a child has an accident at school, I mean, sports or something like that, or if there's a traffic accident on our streets, which are clogged with dump trucks, or if there is a heart attack, which my family personally experienced not long ago. My second reason for wanting this facility closer to my home -- it's not in my exact neighborhood, but closer -- is that these -- as Commissioner Fiala mentioned, the roadways are very clogged out there, and everything that we can stop coming from the far east in towards Naples will free up your doctors' offices, your dentists' offices, and unclog your emergency rooms in your hospitals. And every road trip we can take off will mean we have to build fewer megaroads out there, and we'd be grateful for that. Page 34 June 5, 2007 And finally, the last reason that I'm in favor of this is because -- a very personal reason. Not long ago a very dear family (sic) of mine had a medical emergency, a very severe medical emergency. And I drove into the hospitals here in Naples. And I will tell you that it may only be 10 miles, but when your loved one is between life and death, it might as well be a hundred, because it feels that way. And we would all like to not be second -class citizens out there and have opportunities and services that people in here in Naples have. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yeah. And I thank you so much, and I appreciate the audience participation. I don't know if we're going to -- probably only one other issue we're going to have come before us today is going to spark so much interest. And I feel very strongly about this too. I think it's a facility that meets the needs of that particular area. I like a lot of things that have taken place. I'm sorry about the fact that they didn't get on the stick a little bit sooner with the medical part of the -- portion of it as far as the Planning Commission goes. It would have been great to have them weigh in at the beginning. We had the public information meetings. And I'm going to chastise you a little bit about that. In the future, make sure when you're going to bring a product to us it's a final product. However, with that said, I don't want this delayed a couple of years more in the process and not be able to go forward with it. I -- the petitioner did everything that you could possibly expect him to do. In fact, I asked him to write a white paper afterwards whether he's successful or not explaining the process he went through. His outreach has been unbelievable. He even incorporated something that we may see more of in the future where he -- excuse me one second. And I can't possibly grab them all, but there's 600 some of these cards back there. What he did was, to try to keep this survey being as non - biased _ as possible and nobody'd be able to pre -sort it, he took the liberty of Page 35 June 5, 2007 addressing it to my office, which impressed me, you know. I kind of thought this might be the thing that would sink the ship because nobody's ever done an effective survey of Golden Gate Estates at this point in time as far as the -- their personal feelings as far as commercial, especially medical. This has overwhelmingly been in favor by a large majority of the medical facility. And with that, being in mind the fact that we have this going back before the Planning Commission and we have it coming back before us, I'm going to make a motion for transmittal to also include what the neighborhood information meeting that they had a couple days ago, the requirements that they put into it be included in that. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Commissioner, I'll second your vote, I'll second your motion, because I was impressed with the fact that the transportation issue was brought out repeatedly and that it will take pressure off of 951 by people being able to get to medical facilities closer to home. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: That's correct. This is a case of the public benefit far outweighing the letter of the suggested directions that we received in the past. And I think even Joe Schmitt will agree that it's been a soft rejection based upon what the actual law was itself and that he -- do you want to comment on that, Mr. Schmitt, just so I don't go and put words in your mouth? MR. SCHMITT: Well, again, we -- as -- as directed by this board, we're looking at every aspect of growth east of 951. We were concerned about premature plan amendments somewhat derailing some of that process, but the needs outweigh some of those aspects of the -- in regards to the planning and some of the work that that committee is doing in looking at what is needed as far as east of 951. And, of course, they're looking at all aspects of 951. So it's a policy decision we throw to the board in regards to -- and we discussed this in the past in front of this board regarding Page 36 June 5, 2007 commercial activities and these type of facilities in the Estates and the need for it. And, of course, it does have the potential to reduce, as was stated by many of the speakers, reduce folks having to transit into Naples for those same services. So, again, throw the ball, it's in your court. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, thank you. Thank you, sir. Commissioner Halas? COMMISSIONER HALAS: Yes. I just hope that if this does get transmitted that this petitioner isn't going to come back at a later date and change the color of the leopard so that he can put some other commercial in there. I also have some concerns that -- and I think this is a thing that the people all realize, that I believe that Ave Maria is also building an infirmary out there, so there will be some medical facilities there. The other thing I have concerns of is medical waste getting into -- leaching into the water, but that's something we can address at a later date. So I understand the concerns that the citizens have out there, and things are happening rapidly out there. But as I said, there's an infirmary that is going to be also out there. And I would hope that the petitioner understands that we're not here to play games. When you bring something before the Planning Commission and then turn everything around, I don't -- I'm not too happy about that, so -- but I probably will vote in favor of this to have it transmitted to DCA only because of the fact of the outpouring of concern by the residents. And I hope, as I said earlier, that this petitioner better not come back here and try to change the colors of the stripes again, or the spots. MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Coyle? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. In support of that, I would Page 37 June 5, 2007 suggest that we include in the motion that it includes specifically medical uses, because it appears that this is the overwhelming desire, and if it -- and restrict it to medical uses. And if that is the case, then the approval will not be effected if there's any other attempted use. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, at this point in time -- and I've been through this particular issue with the petitioner. There's no way that there's enough of a population there to support 100 percent medical. And there was tremendous support for other commercial type of things, especially the -- what do you want to call it? Such trades that generate -- what do you -- professional buildings, was the was 50 percent medical, was it? How were we -- Mr. Fernandez? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. The commitment that the neighborhood asked us to make was that the majority of the square footage that gets approved be medical, and we agreed to that. And also we made an agreement that 100 percent of the parking would be designed -- for instance, the southeast quadrant right now has 36,000 square feet. Unfortunately it doesn't have the parking that would support medical. A hundred percent of the site will be developed at a medical ration so that it can accommodate 100 percent medical in the future. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I'm sorry. You just lost me on that statement. MR. FERNANDEZ: The majority of the square footage would be medical, and in addition to that, it would be designed so that it could accommodate 100 percent. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. But what is the percentage of medical that you're going to absolutely irrevocably -- MR. FERNANDEZ: The majority, which would be 51 percent, say, or you know -- essentially, if we're 45,000 square feet, we're talking about 23,000 of it being medical. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I think when you bring it back, you may want to look at 60 percent as being a more realistic number. Page 38 June 5, 2007 - MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Well, I think if you're going to impose a percentage on it, we should do it at the time of approval now rather than -- rather than telling him to come back with some change in the future. I'd like to get as specific as we can about this. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Would you agree to 60 percent, sir? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Anything else, Commissioner? COMMISSIONER COYLE: No, I'm fine. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Henning? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Thank you. Just the overall -- these petitions on the agenda to change the Growth Management Plan, I just have a concern about -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I'm sorry, Commissioner Henning. Could you -- just a little bit closer to your mike. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I just have a concern about relying on government. Just a short process, a few years ago, that went through the process of changing the Golden Gate Master Plan because there were concerns of commercials in certain areas, and so the board adopted it. And now the East of 951 Horizon Committee will be dealing with similar issues again. I personally think that government should be relied on, on what it's saying, or just don't do any more of these committees and let the landowners come petition the board. But we have spent some money and the citizens spent the time, and I just can't support it for that reason. But I understand the comments of the constituents in Golden Gate Estates, the need for that. Don't disagree with that. Should have did that three years ago. Don't know what the Horizon Committee's going to bring. And I just can't support the motion because of that reason, and others, on here. Page 39 June 5, 2007 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, you have to vote your conscience, Commissioner Henning. Of course, when this comes back to us, I think if you see an approval from the Planning Commission and other neighborhood meetings, you might be more receptive at that point in time? COMMISSIONER HENNING: I'm always open. Try to stay open. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: You do a good job at that, sir. Any other comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Hearing none, all those in -- okay, Marjorie. MS. STUDENT - STIRLING: Just a quick point of order. I believe there was a change from a majority of medical to 60 percent, and it's implied that the motion maker agrees, and does the second agree? And that's all. Thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Motion maker agrees. Does the second? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Second does. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Second agrees. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Thank you, Margie. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Any other comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Hearing none, all those in favor of a transmittal with the additions that we added to that, indicate by saying aye. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Opposed? COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. Page 40 June 5, 2007 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And let the record show Commissioner Henning voted in the opposition. Also, too, in the back of the room we have Mr. Mudd who's one year older today. I want everybody to turn around and recognize him and say Happy Birthday, Jim Mudd. (Applause.) CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And with that, you've been such good boys and girls recognizing Jim Mudd, I'm going to give you a 10- minute break. (A brief recess was had.) MR. WEEKS: You have a live mike, Mr. Chairman. Item #2B PETITION: CP- 2005 -5 Commissioners, the next petition is CP- 2005 -5, petition requesting amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Map Series, to amend the Golden Gate Estates commercial infill subdistrict, to expand the subdistrict by 13 acres, allow up to 115,000 square feet of intermediate commercial and general office uses, and allow residential uses at 15 dwelling units per acre for property located at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 29, Township 49 south, Range 26 east, consisting of approximately 18 acres. MS. MOSCA: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. For the record, my name is Michelle Mosca with your Comprehensive Planning Staff. The petitioner /agent/owner is not here today. Staff has had several communications with the agent or representative in the past, and they were questioning whether or not to continue with this Page 41 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS III. MARKET STUDY COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS DOCUMENT DATE: JUNE 8, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Fernandez, AICP Planning Development, Inc. FROM: G. Russell Weyer, Senior Associate SUBJECT: Response to Staff Comments: Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard Market Study DATE: June 8, 2007 Update VIA: E -mail only 1.0 Background. This memorandum is to address comments raised in Staff s Executive Summary relative to the 2005 Cycle GMP Amendment at the southwest corner Golden Gate and Wilson Boulevards. Upon review of the market study, Staff is concerned that first, it fails to include acreage within the NW, SW, and SE quadrants of the subject Neighborhood Center. Second, Staff suspects the trade area shoud be larger than the stated 2 -miles since the preferred use is medical /professional office and urgent care center. In response to Staffs first comment, the potential for each quadrant of the Neighborhood Center to contain commercial development is as follows: Southwest Quadrant The Snowy Egret Plaza CPUD is located at the southwest quadrant of the Neighborhood Center. The CPUD consists of a single parcel owned by Walgreen Co. and is designated to comprise of 15,000 square feet of commercial development on 4.19 acres — presumably a Walgreen's Store. The Consultant feels that it is unlikely this parcel will consist of office space. The balance of the quadrant consists of the subject properties of the market study. Page 1 Northwest Quadrant Located at the northwest quadrant of the Neighborhood Center is a single vacant commercial parcel approximately 5.3 acres in size, land use code 10. 1 (one) acre of this parcel is designated for right of way. The folio number for this parcel is 37119880003. Northeast Quadrant There is a developed commercial parcel in this quadrant listed as E's Country Store. In addition, immediately north, there is a 2.67 acre vacant commercial parcel, land use code 10, under the same ownership. The folio number for this parcel is 37280040002. Southeast Quadrant The Wilson Blvd Center CPUD is located at the southeast quadrant of the Neighborhood Center. It is comprises 7.15 acres, 2.15 of which are designated for buffering and right -of -way. Construction is currently under way for some or all of the approved 42,000 square feet of commercial space. According to County staff, the site plan for this center consists solely of commercial /retail space. Based on this inventory of all quadrants in question, the Consultant has determined that parcels at two of the quadrants will compete, or have the potential to compete, for office space demand: 1) the 5.3 acre vacant commercial parcel on the nortwest quadrant, folio number 37119880003 — less 1 (one) acre designated for right of way - and 2) the 2.67 acre vacant commercial parcel immediately north of E's Country store on the northeast quadrant, folio number 37280040002. It is important to note that both of the above referenced parcels are eligible for commercial development which may or may not include office uses. It is the Consultant's experience that market factors such as area demand and risk/return characteristics will likely result in the use of these parcels for commercial /retail development. However, the Consultant still included these parcels as potentially competing for future office demand in the analysis. Utilizing this information, the Consultant has revised the office needs analysis as follows: 2.0 Commercial - Office Need The Project is planned as a 7 +/- acre office development on the southwest quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards. The Project will comprise of approximately 45,000 square feet of office space. The Consultant has analyzed the demand for new office space in the County, on a per capita basis, as well as the implied need for additional office acreage within 2 miles of the Project site. Page 2 11 a Using records provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser's office and Collier Comprehensive Planning Department, the Consultant has determined: There is no developed office acreage within 2 miles of the Project. Land uses included in this analysis were code 17 -Office Bldg, Non -profit Svcs, One- story; 18 -Office Bldg, Non - profit Svcs, Multi -story; 19- Professional Svcs Bldg.; 23- Financial Institutions; and 24- Insurance Company Offices. There is one vacant commercial parcel within 2 -miles of the project located at the northwest quadrant of the Neighborhood Center and one vacant commercial parcel located at the northeast quadrant. Land uses included in this analysis were code 10- Vacant Commercial. The folio number for the parcel located at the northwest quadrant is: 37119880003. This parcel is approximately 5.3 acres in size — less 1 (one) acre designated for right of way. The folio number for the parcel located on the northwest quadrant is 37280040002. It is 2.67 acres in size and located immediately north of E's Country Store under the same ownership. The Consultant also utilized the County's GIS zoning maps found on the Collier County website to determine if there were any other zoned commercial office parcels within the two -mile area and found none. Therefore, total lands that could potentially compete as office acreage within the Project's 2 -mile trade area equal 6.97 acres. When determining the demand for office uses, the Consultant utilized the Collier County Property Appraiser's database to inventory the total square footage of all existing office uses as of 2005. This total was then divided by the 2005 Collier County total population as determined by BEBR to arrive at a per capita office demand. Table 2.1, below, indicates the total office development in Collier County, corresponding population, and per capita office demand. Table 2.1 Collier County Population and Office Forecast Office 2005 Bldo Soft 2005 Collier Pop. Per Capita Total 3,326,042 317,788 10.47 Source: Fishkind & Associates, Inc. & Collier County Property Appraiser & BEBR Population Studies Through the analysis, the Consultant has determined that, on average, the County needs 10.47 Sq. Ft. of office space per person. Within the 2 -mile market surrounding the Project the Consultant has determined that by the year 2010, the population will reach approximately 7,109 persons. The Consultant's population forecast for the market surrounding the Project is shown in Table 2.2 on the next page. Additionally, Table 2.2 indicates the office needs associated with these historic and forecast population levels. Page 3 Table 2.2 Historic & Forecast Population for 2 -Mile Market Without the Proposed Amendment Office Sq. Ft. Office Acres Office Acres Office Acres Allocation Year Population Demand Demand Supply Surplus /(Deficit) Ratio 2005 5,732 59,992 9.06 6.97 (2.09) 0.77 2010 7,109 74,404 11 23 6.97 (4.26) 0.62 Note: Acres demanded are calculated as Sq. Ft. demanded divided by 6,624 Sq. Ft. per acre, as determined by Property Appraiser's records. Source: Fishkind & Associates, Inc. & Collier County Property Appraiser's Office According to the Consultant's analysis there is an immediate need for office uses in the 2 -mile market surrounding the Project. There is an approximate need for 9.06 acres of office land in this market as of 2005 and with 6.97 acres of competing land within the market area, there is an allocation ratio of 0.77. This falls well below the allocation ratio of 2.0 as recommended by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (see Appendix A). By 2010, this need is expected to increase to 11.23 acres. Unless the proposed amendment is added to the FLUM, by 2010 the allocation ratio for office land is expected to drop to 0.62. There is insufficient land within this market designated for office use or potentially available for office use, which reduces the amount of sufficient choices for a developer to accommodate the demand. This allocation ratio is low enough to warrant the addition of this land to the FLUM. If the proposed changes for this project are approved, The County will add approximately 7 acres of office supply to this market. By adding land allocated to office development, the County will reduce the need for additional office lands. This land will increase the 2010 allocation ratio from 0.62 to 1.24. By 2010, the allocation ratio will reach 1.24, below the desired level of 2.00 as mentioned previously. Table 2.3 below shows the effect of the proposed amendment on the allocation of office land within the 2 -mile market. Table 2.3 Historic & Forecast Population for 2 -Mile Market With the Proposed Amendment Office Sq. Ft. Office Acres Office Acres Office Acres Allocation Year Population Demand Demand Supplied Surplus /(Deficit) Ratio 2005 5,732 59,992 9.06 6.97 (2.09) 0.77 2010 7,109 74,404 11.23 13.97 2.74 1.24 Note: Acres demanded are calculated as Sq. Ft. demanded divided by 6,624 Sq. Ft. per acre, as determined by Property Appraiser's records. Source: Fishkind & Associates, Inc. & Collier County Property Appraiser's Office. Page 4 m Taking into account all developed land and vacant commercial land in the market, there are currently insufficient lands designated for office use. The 2010 allocation ratio of 0.62 indicates an extremely tight relationship between the demand for and the supply of office space. The under - allocation of suitable office property supports the need for the additional acreage. 3.0 Conclusions Concerning the Proposed Change to the Future Land Use Plan for Golden Gate Estates Mixed Use Project The commercial office component of this Project is designed to serve the 2 -mile trade area's demand for office space. The location provides the access and visibility that are required for this type of development. The under - allocation of suitable office property supports the need for the additional office acreage. As stated above and taking into account all developed and vacant commercial land within 2 -miles of the Project, there are currently insufficient lands designated for office uses. The 2010 office allocation ratio indicates an extremely tight relationship between the demand and supply for office space. In response to staff's second comment, the Consultant feels that it would be of little benefit for the analysis to extend the trade area beyond 2- miles. It is anticipated that extending the trade area would substantially increase demand and the supply would include only one additional Neighborhood Center (Everglades Blvd and Golden Gate Blvd Center). The increase in demand would outpace the increase in supply thus reducing the allocation ratios further. Additionally, if Staff suggests that the trade area be larger than the stated 2 -miles because the preferred use is medical /professional office and urgent care center, then the Consultant recommends that the supply side should also reflect only that use. Page 5 fig APPENDIX A Commercial Supply- Demand Ratio Definition A supply -demand ratio of 2.0 for commercial properties in a given area is good for the marketplace for a number of reasons. One must first keep in mind that the supply number is generated from a combination of commercial square footage already built, approved commercial square footage not yet built and land that has the potential to be commercial in the future as indicated by the jurisdiction's comprehensive land use plan. The supply will generally be on the high side due to the fact that in our analysis, all future potential commercial lands are included. If just the existing space and approved space were included in the analysis, the ratio would be much lower and the demand would be met earlier. By choosing an allocation ration the county /city is able to help maintain reasonable land costs. In the same sense that the FED uses the FED Funds Rate to control the economy (i.e., prevent recessions and keep inflation in check), the county can adopt an allocation ration greater than 1.0. Basically, the allocation ratio will keep supply above demand, thereby placing downward pressure on land prices. The downward pressures on land prices make land more affordable, giving developers incentive to meet future demand by allowing for a higher rate of return on their investment. Future choices of commercial space (spread out over a geographic area) will also positively benefit residents. Their new expected travel costs will be lower than those under an allocation ratio of 1.0. Reducing travel costs and maintaining reasonable land costs increases the welfare of the affected population. Thus, the county is able to maximize expected benefits to both developers and residents by choosing an allocation ratio greater than 1.0. The allocation ratio of 2.0 is generally used in the current time frame for the reasons mentioned above. When looking longer term such as in the case of a governmental jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, which requires a 20 to 30 year analysis, the allocation ratio needs to be higher in the 4.0 range to account for forecasting margins of error. F Page 6 C � 0 G J � O N d N d N w U U U U °0 0 0 0 00 O W O °l O r r n n n m m m m m 0 o a 0 0 U N N Q V d 0 a d 0 0 0 0 m m U U ouoo O N O E E w E E 0 0 m U U d d U U d d m rI n o �n m a m yam ono m ` N 10 Vl N C B N U � Q N U d E E 0 U r n n r n N N N N N O� W m O D7 Y V C Y V L d C O H cl am om0 0 v _ N a• % T _ ~ a n N a N 0 > O y > N R ` rn m E LL E a o 0 M n n 0 E m ° U m E = j E ° c u a c j R N ° u n z m W d u a E m O O ° E z z 2 Z E �D L o E N O p W W d 2 v m a 0 N U ¢ ¢ U CD p 7g Z m o O w w m w d O O o 0 J J N O O0 O yN N Z > W y WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS IV. TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT DOCUMENT DATE: MAY 2, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT •: GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW IST ST CPD (PROJECT NO. 050319-10) PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. 13881 Plantation Road, Suite 11 Fort Myers, Florida 339124339 239 - 278 -3090 Document Date: June 7, 2005 Revised May 2, 2007 Limited revision to convert proposed intensity from shopping center (retail) to medical office. Base document data was not updated. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. May 2, 2007 Mr. Michael Fernandez Planning Development Incorporated 5133 Castello Drive, Unit 92 Naples, FL 34103 RE: Golden Gate Blvd @ Is' Street SW CPD Dear Mr. Fernandez: 13881 PLANTATION ROAD, SUITE 11 FORT MYERS, FL 33912 -4339 OFFICE 239.2783090 FAX239.278.1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEM5 /DE5IGN Based on your request, TR Transportation Consultants has updated the previously submitted TIS for the above mentioned project in order to reflect a 45,000 square foot medical office development rather than a 45,000 square foot shopping center development. Based on the changes to the use on the site, Table I has been created to indicate the impact to the trip generation. A negative value within Table 1 indicates a reduction in traffic as a result of the proposed changes in land use while a positive value reflects an increase in traffic. Table 1 Trip Generation Golden Gate Boulevard a().. SW 1" Street CPD As can be seen within Table 1, the medical office use will decrease the trip generation during the critical PM peak hour as well as over the course of the entire day. However, the trip generation will be slightly increased during the AM peak hour. Regardless, concurrency is measured during the PM Peak hour, so the proposed development will significantly reduce the total traffic generated on the subject site. It should also be noted that, after a reduction to the retail traffic for pass -by, the medical office use will still generate fewer trips in the PM peak hour. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert L. Price Senior Transportation Consultant Weekda A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use (2 -way) In Out Total In Out Total Shopping Center 60 35 95 175 195 370 4,040 (45,000 s . ft.) Medical Office 90 20 110 40 110 150 1,625 (45,000 s . ft.) Trip Difference +30 -15 1 +15 -135 85 220 1 -2,415 As can be seen within Table 1, the medical office use will decrease the trip generation during the critical PM peak hour as well as over the course of the entire day. However, the trip generation will be slightly increased during the AM peak hour. Regardless, concurrency is measured during the PM Peak hour, so the proposed development will significantly reduce the total traffic generated on the subject site. It should also be noted that, after a reduction to the retail traffic for pass -by, the medical office use will still generate fewer trips in the PM peak hour. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert L. Price Senior Transportation Consultant TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE VIII. CONCLUSION TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. I. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. The site is located in the southeast corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and SW I" Street in the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County, Florida. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1. The proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW Is' Street site will allow for the development of a maximum of 45,000 square feet of commercial floor area. Access to the site is being proposed via three access locations, full access points to SW 1s' Street and Wilson Boulevard in addition to a right in/right out access to Golden Gate Boulevard. This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways and intersections. Trip generation and assignments to the various site access drives will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the north by Golden Gate Boulevard and vacant land zoned for commercial uses. To the west, the site is bordered by SW Is' Street. On the southern property boundary, the subject site is bordered by vacant land that is zoned for residential uses. To the east, the site is bordered by Wilson Boulevard and vacant land that is zoned for commercial uses. Golden Gate Boulevard is a four -lane divided arterial roadway that borders the subject site to the north. Golden Gate Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. The Level of Service Standard on the section of Golden Gate Boulevard from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard is LOS "D ", or 2,350 vehicles. The nearest signalized intersection on Golden Gate Boulevard in the Page I _ TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. vicinity of the subject site is Wilson Boulevard approximately 680 feet to the east of SW I" Street. Wilson Boulevard is a two -lane collector roadway that borders the subject site to the east. Wilson Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. The intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard currently allows full turning movements under signalized conditions. SW 1s' Street is a two -lane local roadway that borders the subject site to the west. SW I" Street is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. Concurrency is not measured on SW I" Street since it is classified as a local roadway. The intersection of SW Is` Street and Golden Gate Boulevard currently allows full turning movements under unsignalized conditions. I11. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1" Street CPD will allow for the development of a maximum of 45,000 square feet of commercial floor area within the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County. Based on this application, the commercial floor area is being restricted to office space. Table 1 summarizes the land use utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject development. Table 1 Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1s` Street CPD Land Uses Land Use Size Medical Office LUC 720) 45,000 square feet Access to the subject site is proposed via full access points to SW 1" Street and Wilson Boulevard in addition to a right - in/right out access to Golden Gate Boulevard. SW is' Street will provide full unsignalized access to Golden Gate Boulevard while Wilson Page 3 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Boulevard's intersection with Golden Gate Boulevard operates trader signalized conditions. IV. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7`h Edition. Trip generation calculations were performed for the development based on a "worst case" trip generation scenario for the proposed office use. Therefore, the trip generation calculations were performed based on Land Use Code 720 (Medical /Dental Office Building) for the office use since medical office typically generates a higher amount of traffic than general office space. The equations for this land use are contained in the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 2 outlines the anticipated weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour trip generation of the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I` Street CPD. The daily trip generation is also indicated within Table 2. Table 2 Trip Generation Golden Gate Boulevard Z SW V Street CPD Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekft P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2 -way) In Out Total In Out Total Medical Office 90 20 110 40 110 150 1,625 (45,000 s . R.) V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The trips shown in Table 2 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based upon the anticipated routes the drivers will utilize to approach the site. The project distribution utilized for the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD was assumed based upon the general lack of similar commercial sites within the Golden Gate Estates. Thus, approximately 40% of the development traffic was assumed to originate from the west while the remaining 60% of the development traffic was assumed to come from the Page 4 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. north, east, and south. The project distribution for the proposed development is indicated in Figure 2. It should be noted that the project traffic was not distributed to Collier Boulevard due to the fact that it is unlikely that a significant amount of the project traffic will originate from the Collier Boulevard corridor. There are several planned /existing commercial opportunities along the Collier Boulevard corridor, so the majority of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD traffic will originate from within the Golden Gate Estates area. Based upon the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 2, the project traffic was distributed to the projects access points to Wilson Boulevard, SW I" Street, and Golden Gate Boulevard. Figure 3 indicates the site traffic assignment for the Golden Gate Boulevard cgi SW I" Street CPD. This graphic also indicates the site traffic assignment to Golden Gate Boulevard's intersection with Wilson Boulevard and SW I" Street. VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table ]A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 3 % -3 % -5% Significance Test. Therefore, the project traffic was compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour — Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2006 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). Based on the information contained within Table IA, no roadway links will be significantly impacted in accordance with the Collier County 3 % -3 % -5% Significance Test. Therefore, concurrency link analysis was only required on Golden Gate Boulevard adjacent to the subject site. In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table IA also includes a concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity indicated within Table I was taken from the 2006 AUIR. The project traffic was then subtracted from the remaining trips in order to obtain determine the remaining capacity Page 5 TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP Revised 5/2/07 Figure 1 CONSULTANTS, INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD N W E S N.T.S. IMMOKALEE ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH I ROAD PINE RIDGE ROAD W J O m w w J J O U GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD 4 -40 %-► i GrGntn ♦20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION 0 Of Q w J m 20% Z + O m J 2: w w O O � ♦30 %-► 101% TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Revised 5/2/07 Figure 2 CONSULTANTS, INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1St St CPD ♦ -(10) ,4(-20(5) (10) 20 ♦ .i (5)15> o , ANN 4-20(15) (5) - ♦ 1 GOLI (1'0) 20 N 1 ° M 0 10 (40) N N JN (25) -1 (10) -N -4- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4- (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS 4- 15 (5) r 10 (5) % o uio 0 TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Revised 5/2/07 Figure 3 CONSULTANTS,INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD K w J O [D O Z O v � 1 _ GATE BOULEVARD 1 (15) 5 (25) 5 ( -) - N N JN (25) -1 (10) -N -4- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4- (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS 4- 15 (5) r 10 (5) % o uio 0 TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Revised 5/2/07 Figure 3 CONSULTANTS,INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. after the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 0 Street CPD traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Based upon the information contained within Table IA, sufficient capacity will be available on the Collier County roadway network after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD traffic. Figure 4 indicates the remaining capacity on Golden Gate Boulevard based upon the existing conditions as well as after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD traffic. As can be seen within Table 1A and Figure 4, there will be available capacity after the addition of the traffic associated with the subject development, so there are no concurrency issues on the Collier County roadway network. Intersection analysis was required as a result of the proposed development at the site access location to Golden Gate Boulevard. ht order to perform the intersection analysis at this intersection at build -out, the through volumes on Golden Gate Boulevard were assumed to be the same in each direction. The peak hour, peak direction through volume was calculated by subtracting the remaining capacity on Golden Gate Boulevard from the total capacity available for the roadway. In other words, 332 trips (remaining capacity) were subtracted from 2,350 trips (total capacity) in order to determine that the existing peak hour, peak direction traffic volume on Golden Gate Boulevard is 2,018 vehicles. The intersection turning movements indicated within Figure 3 were added to the 2,018 vehicle through volume in order to perform the intersection analysis. These volumes were then inputted into the latest Highway Capacity Software (HCS +) based on the right - in /right -out conditions of the site access intersection to Golden Gate Boulevard. Based upon the results of the intersection analysis, the northbound approach to Golden Gate Boulevard will operate at LOS "C° or better after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street site traffic to the surrounding roadway network. The intersection analysis results can be found in the Appendix of this report for reference. Page 8 N W E S N.T.S. IMMOKALEE ROAD PINE RIDGE ROAD I FGFND 000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [000] REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE • REMAINING CAPACITY ON Revised 5/2/07 �j TRANSPORTATION COUNTY ROADWAY NETWORK Figure 4 CONSULTANTS, INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD 0 w J O m VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD 332 z (312) 0 [292] o 1.7% > w GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD O 332 w (296) U) [288) 00 1.9% U)i PINE RIDGE ROAD I FGFND 000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [000] REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE • REMAINING CAPACITY ON Revised 5/2/07 �j TRANSPORTATION COUNTY ROADWAY NETWORK Figure 4 CONSULTANTS, INc. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Based on the results of the intersection analyses, no intersection improvements will be required to the site access intersection to Golden Gate Boulevard as a result of the added development traffic. Turn lane improvements will be required when the development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network based on the Collier County Ordinance 93 -64. Turn lanes will be required on Golden Gate Boulevard at its intersection with the proposed right - in/right -out access driveway. Additionally, a westbound left turn lane will likely have to be constructed on Golden Gate Boulevard at the SW lst Street intersection after the addition of the development4raffic. A southbound right turn lane on Wilson Boulevard may be required as a result of the added development traffic as well. However, the specific turn lane improvements will be determined as a part of the SDP process when a more specific development scenario is available for the subject site. VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed re- zoning of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1" Street CPD in the southeast corner of the Golden Gate Boulevard /SW 1" Street intersection within the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County, Florida will not adversely impact the Collier County roadway network. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the most recent Collier County Concurrency Management System. Based upon the analysis contained within this report, no roadway segments are shown to experience a significant impact as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Golden Gate Boulevard is shown to have sufficient capacity alter the addition of the traffic associated with the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1" Street CPD. Therefore, no roadway link improvements will be required as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Intersection analysis was performed at Golden Gate Boulevard's intersection with the proposed right -in /right -out site access as a result of the proposed development. Based on the results of the intersection analysis, all of the analyzed intersection approaches are shown to operate at LOS °C" or better when the development traffic is added to the Page 10 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. surrounding roadway network. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be required as a result of the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD. Turn lane requirements are likely as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. However, the specific turn lane requirements will be reviewed at the SDP stage when a more specific development scenario is available for the subject site. Based on the analysis contained within this report, the re- zoning of the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD will not adversely affect the future traffic conditions within the vicinity of the project site. All roadway links and intersections analyzed as a part of this report will operate acceptably when the development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. \k'.\2005 \03 \19\ I0 \re1mt.dm: Page 1 I _ APPENDIX TABLE IA k(§ f \))) Z w In / o § \AIL § §LU § « g c ) )§k\( w ® 2 b 4 y 2§ R § ) ox 0. § §� a J $ ) / ± �w ` (L \ ) \) ®�L , ? a ^ - ` �s wZ §2e) �< -- L § , B 2 })»2 ` \ \\ It If \} ¢\( ®,e )( \( 70 HCS CAPACITY ANALYSIS RIGHT -IN /RIGHT -OUT @ GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD C, w It 0 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 512/2007 11 :02 AM TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RLP Intersection Golden Gate @ Rt In/Rt Out nc /Co. TR transportation Consultants Jurisdiction Collier Count a Performed 5212007 nal sis Year Buildout nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description F0503.19 -10 - Golden Gate Blvd @ SW 1st St CPD East/West Street: Golden Gate Boulevard North /South Street: Ri ht -in/Ri ht out Intersection Orientation: East -West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h) 2018 20 2038 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 2124 21 0 2145 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h 10 r -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I .ly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h) 0 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh /h) 10 C (m)(veh /h) 223 v/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.14 Control Delay (s /veh) 21.9 LOS C Approach Delay (s /veh) — 21.9 pproach LOS C C, w It 0 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 512/2007 11 :02 AM I TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 Infnrmatinn nal st RLP Rntersection Golden Gate Rtln /Rt Out ncy /Co. 1TR Transportation Consultants urisdiction ICollier Count Performed 51212007 naI sis Year uildout Iknalysis Time Period IPM Peak Hour 0.25 Pro ect Description F0503.19 -10 - Golden Gate Blvd @ SW 1st St CPD East/West Street: Golden Gate Boulevard North /South Street: Ri ht -in/Ri ht out Intersection Orientation: East -West tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad- ustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh /h 2023 10 2033 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 0 2129 10 0 2140 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R old (veh/h 35 Hour Factor, PHF 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 i Ay Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h 0 0 36 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh /h) 36 C (m) (veh /h) 222 v/c 0.16 95% queue length 0.57 Control Delay (s /veh) 24.3 LOS C Approach Delay (s /veh) 24.3 Approach LOS C Cr ^ 1t 0 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 5/2/2007 11 :03 AM TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD @ SW 1St STREET CPD ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7tn EDITION Land Use Weekday AM Peak How Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily (2 -way) Medical /Dental Office (LUC 720) T = 2.48 (X) Ln (T) = 0.93 Ln (X) + 1.47 T = 40.89 (X) - 214.97 T = Trips, X = 1,000 s . ft. of GLA WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 V. Letter of Support from Dr. Robert Tober Dated: March 4, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 IIAR -04 -2007 21:32 FRal: March 4, 2007 Department of Land Planing Collier County, Florida Dear Department of Land Planning Collier County, Florida: 70:2395976022 P.1,1 I am writing this letter on behalf of Dr. Robert McGann, M.D., retired cardiovascular surgeon. I met and joined Dr. McGann some 15 years ago when he started his first urgent care center in Naples near the comer of Lunnokalee and 41. 1 have been u partner with him on two of his property sites where he operates urgent care ranters. He is now planning on building a full - service urgent care center in eastern Golden Gate. Specifically, he would like to build on the SW comer of Golden Gate Blvd and Wilson Blvd. This would require rezoning this comer to commercial in order for Dr. McGann (and myself) to bring a complete medical facility to that location that would have laboratory and X -ray capability and offer urgent and family medical care to all residents, young and old, in that area. We plan to have pediatricians as well as family and emergency physicians in that location. These arc no medical facilities at this time anywhere on Golden Gate Blvd. The closest medical facility would probably be Physician's Regional Medical Center Pine Ridge or Collier Blvd. At any rate, Dr. McGann already operates 3 urgent care centers (soon to be four); all of which provide outstanding urgent care, family care, pediatric care and internal medicine care to a large variety of people. I write this letter to you to formally request your considering rezoning this comer for build -out of an urgent care center, physician's offices and an imaging and laboratory center. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance or information to yon. Sincerely. jRobert Boyd T"obFACEP Medical Director Health Clinic Medical Director Collier County EMS Medical Director NCH Wound Healing Center & Hyperbaric Oxygen Unit 6400 Davis Blvd., Suite 104 Naples, Florida 34112 239 -403- 2600- Telepbone 239 403 - 2602 -Fax 239 450 -5375 -Cell WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS VI. NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SUPPORT — PETITION (Petition Signatures gathered by property owner) Considered by BCC at 6/5/07 Transmittal Hearing GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SUPPORT PETITION GROUP 1 (COPIES OF ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, FOLLOWED BY TYPED LIST OF NAMES) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE - CP- 2005 -2 This petition is signed in supportive "yes" response to the question, "Is there a need for additional commercial services at the intersection of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd., on the site immediately adjacent to and west of the approved upcoming Walgreen's site ?" COPY - 3 PkL) -y - -- o� ��- C-!__` t-7z " a5 "2 5T- !! •!J Pt.ES ryr�� J - ✓ � �i � 371! � �v f , _J . i� -_ _I.� � - -D —J _?k lip D 7 3 -07- / 2117 S COPY This petition is signed in supportive "yes" response to the question, "Is there a need for additional commercial — services at the intersection of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd., on the site immediately adjacent to and west of the approved upcoming Walgreen's site ?" 3D �>'..����� 31 42:0 S upomd 2 28 -o-7 2DZ Jaen? Ctt<<E De NRY�S ut e .fin 37..Nt�W' �- 38. cas_ a s4a 5ie c - QJ_.... COPY This petition is signed in supportive "yes" response to the question, "is there a need for additional commercial services at the intersection of Golden Gate Blvd. and Wilson Blvd., an the site immediately adjacent to and west of the approved upcoming Walgreen's site?" J V f 49 S -3 A./c,01 e- 61 ---QI - 62- _ 7 i - �7 1 �A -7.4 --(0 7 64- _QI7 -7 1. e7v ! _4,q ttj 5,r jLT-� 5-0" . WA � LOO 3 17V 1/ 7- ,kijar-n e V 157- iq-416 A2..W 0) -7 xr/o 3eer6( i�F9- SlrJ �,Apj -o7 COPY This petition is signed in a supportive "yes" response to the question, "Are additional commercial services needed in Golden Gate Estates ?" E G G b rG i 7 2 71 of 11fII1 .. ♦ 1, A i s .1 / 1 IL'1_, I Y tl N Address Date Response 3. S90 JvN 4-- Aue 'cam yoo o,i L • a %a' /vrl �Ies 17 Sic�L ✓� -�� /c r:s vr�V �I t T4 gm— 13961 cly" ST sir 9 'aY-07 t S �. — 3 a--l' i frt -t-w SJ I ry � 3h, A_ 5 180 S�Qr2 g-R Ln. 3 /ii0-1-. '-/4t?r A -20A NLle b-bL, f' 1 -o 7 O rd CIL- a-7 i,,s _ of 11fII1 .. ♦ 1, A i s .1 / 1 IL'1_, I Y tl d m c m 0 d m d e n mm m 0 v 3 ° c U m N m E m v O m 0 0 A E-3 m M 3 m a� z m m e N E E 0 u m c 0 v D E m w `w i m 3 m c m a a n c m L m L 0 m E N C g n 0 r o n p n o r 0 n 0 r 0 n 0 r n 0 r 0 n 0 r 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 v c `a A A C m m a 6 c m � N m v S ED I� m i0{ l7 � L N Q y °Lr) Q p a 10 ^ n DI tm L N N L N �{ Q 1� U a m ¢ Ipp` A m m ¢ [E�1 Q t p c CD w D n Z Q N N Q p N L L m m L 9 D Q A E w E 0 z m O L m m F E m � `m Z � o ° -� a K > a u. m S ° m � m e m O e m m W S � e iR U `m Y E m O O a c � m = O1 o v LL v L ui LL m = N 17 d N fm n m OI O N M < 10 ml n at � p iG N N m 3 m c m a a n c m L m L 0 m E N C a; N C m m m m N e a n m m t 0 N N 3 O C m m m n m T a E m m 0 m U U m m C O N 3 N m Y 2 m N m U `m E E 0 u m co 0 m 0 m t W i n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 o n 0 p r 0 o n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 aPs n 0 0 n 0 0 i;s� n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 o n 0 p n 0 o r 0 0 O1 m V b m n 0 m N m � m m r m p N O 0 N 5 tONO m N o z N n � 'm �-• 3 pj N W z p 0 N_ W z M 0 N_ W z 0 N_ W z 0 N W z 0 N_ W z 0 V> v A r Q m o N N m v m m ¢ m a m c C m c Q 5 FO mm m > m ° m a - m m c L W •c� c > N E m c z to N c c Ir o �0 2 m ° mN m 0 N e N m m m o N m aa n m n m C 3 0 T v a e c `m m N r 0 C ro m N C m ml m 3 9 m e n a W m L a N m 3 0 c m U W 9 W T W AD E E w O m d d A m C O W yW m U 2 m m m U `m E E V A O °m 0 c m m B n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 o N n 0 a N Ql ry � t0 n � O n f0 Ip n O n Igi 5 121 m N A m Ir U 0 m n z i Q D L c (o NO m 3 rn N IOW m 3 o N N N v w 5 C O m NNO •- n y P O v w — fA m C e w m > P N � y N o n a IA m � m m W m 'C a W m L e � y > m e n N N m O W c E O O c 3 ¢° 12 — m n 5 m c a y 2 0 m y m n =� U - 3 °ry E o , ° o m S 3' 0 o W m c m m 2 m c e L e m m � C4 E 0 O R YJ v 10 v n O m O OI Y O IW i!l N IW IW IO C IW N 1� Ynl h v°IJ fO0 iD m C 3 m ti n e a C m `m 0 0 m E c U a C r ^, p p N L U m n O m d LL an m w W N is C a m a c N m M U _N E E 0 m 0 D a m c 3 0 m n e a c m L L m E m u a 9 O O O O O O O O O O r O A O r O r O N A O N r O N' r O N A O N N A A O O r O c `o b 0 0 c C i e V Q C m 'Y' a m 3 Z O O O O m 23l o i vmi wmi m m m i m c c 3 K K ¢ K i L U > > p U U U W N Y Z E � r 2 E � < n `a Z m P yN Z m o m N n m E N a CD m a 9 Q W E w Y E z' c 0 t m m F c c c v 3 3 z m° F ° f t" ¢° v N Ol O N b r ml O) O fm fp tm �O b w b b A !� v �./ N a o" n U a" n m N ¢` ^ v ^ 3 NMI D O r TIF-a-w a O at d � •- 0 .O N m m c 3 0 m n e a c m L L m E m u a WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SUPPORT PETITION GROUP 2 (COPIES OF ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, FOLLOWED BY TYPED LIST OF NAMES) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE - CP- 2005 -2 ,K u N m � Um z3 N m c U U 7 0-0 Ae O �R � V ,0 0 y u 3 u Gb m � m � o N � r U n m-' r 0 o Z o c o 7 pq � o C a.= y3 .[ C C m O � u 'p R O N F O m 0 O LL � Md) ��� '6 N n p c P I'ti 0 E C > a Y N w'�• ?o ' 3 4 fi me rn ID m %n u' silo 3 V 3 w •. r y, w a E e f�0 O M a T I Z h r 'i a�Oe o a 9 1f � � A At S d a V a O )\ §( \\ )0 (/ ]f \k \/ ƒ� k\ \] )I /\ ek fk �\ \\ /§ ! )y G kki % / \� m � \� \f�k % 5 , ' @\ a G m @ * w k } Q , � ; g a � K \ . \\.• - §\ � *� , \\ / 77j, 4 \k \ § •� j | \w9 %a `§// ® ~ / -2\ LA - !f f 2' t-i { ce / 4 a 0 u 0 U N O .y f/f A � U W z3 N 00 2 1 N O E U _ E S� � Q 0 0. u_ d b � U t9 L W W � 3 C •a y O m y C p o n a °= Cr.- ,; N � O yd C A � N N C V 0 o 0 4 y3 b� �b y y O C m O � .. N 4l 'O O' O w F O r 0 3 IL m 'c V a 0 O `e 9 m 4 9 Q C m r m � v° aN e Z ie 9 Q E w 0 E z' m s m E e Z u o U • a A4 O U 0 U U ,G U m� U z3 w � o a o v V y oa v o w� N " 3 u $ m o m T o u o pN a� d �o N � N ^ t: or a= a 3 m 9 c m C 9 00 � y M N C m O 'Y. d ao h� F o a U s a 0 0 !\ a r y (� r11 M 'm M c° € T =C air �p V" E Q,` b WN o rb z vi `� \T at a U Gi 7 k ƒ \ k k ) k § } � i E / § - k ; § § ) a.! § LU ! § 2 > 2 ! \ 2 2 2 ) § } , { k f ® � k z it JE f . ' ! ! ! ) � { � f { k ; a § k � \ k / ; ! ) G k § \ / 2 § 2 m ■ ; ; § ° k � ; ` | ; / 2 v ! ! . / \ § [ / k � i E / m m c m PD `or 3 D m > e v m m 0 a m m m m a m r ym m E m C D U nN m m 3 m e m E E S C O v N O m m C m m F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 m o N 3 Yl r Q N m E d h N r O > Q m O iy � Q z > ¢ N m z > Q L r r u3i > ¢ L Q ^ z > Q < O• z > Q L N m ai > Q � 0 f0 N 3 m > Q � O n y > Q N t7 h > Q L N N (O N Q C � 3 t m O >° ❑ N 3 L N t0 h O N L N f0 O Q O l7 m N 1� O Ip (p N r m fD O 0 Im N 0 C N 3 O 3 U °m p O E 9 O m C E m 1'l c 3 O m m IO 0 ❑ m U m V m n O m m 9 ¢ F g N N N N n 10 r m r t�l fD b .6 m g �M1� r O A O O A N N N m 17 N m O N m Ol ryb < t�l H Y� N n Y !� vNy�� u2�O Ol dt OI m OI N O) T m OI 01 DI N W N N N N N Dl N OI N OI N O1 N Ol N Ol N e U JE' C Q m f0 m of m __ 3 � c _ Q 3 (7 m m ❑ ry U J m O. m = ❑ m m K m c€ m m K y m r a e > K J 0 � K m 3 w J y m 9 K d Y E c m m 5 ' �°- N N N N N N N N N m m 1J� N m N t- m- m m Q O < d 3 0 t 6 e a m L 0 O E m m u v C m N c m m m m 3 v m e a 6 m m L O N m O C m u m v N T d N 9 E E N 0 O m CJ C7 m m c N 3 m m m N m m E E A O O 9 O 9 m m m m B 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o n ° N N N N N N N N N ry N p N O y_N Z t m Fn Z ¢ Z N Z > m m m m � in o in a°i uQi O1 JE Cc m 4i; MO N N N N m m fm0 fmD Y] pppOb N N N N N N N N N N L �_ N a O m U o m 5 i m '> � y m � o N E -mi n a r � m m c _ 3 o Q m v U Ol P P P N Q m Q v P 0 Q A Q O - h N N C 3 t m e° a m s m D E N n v 9 C WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SUPPORT PETITION GROUP 3 (COPIES OF ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, FOLLOWED BY TYPED LIST OF NAMES) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE - CP- 2005 -2 ❑ O U N 4 OJ ^ [ N 4J y ❑ ^N U CO CL �3 itl ❑ O O O b ❑ O ❑ C. b � N � 3 ❑ b m L � a h � c.� O � d � O y 4 � H A ❑ y O >m •� C 0 a 3 m � ti 'y PG a� ao x F o m 3 O O LL. u N II ft r n c m L _e m D a C m \ 11nn vi !c -i c t a a T MO m � cT N� 11 N In fn Zl- m M M oV' �! 7 VI lip !•�' Q 0, 1 yJ_ q :n c c z Vey C, 0 0 U y ai U DD �3 m � 'm c E N O U E 7 0 U p�j o a b N w o � 3 �b A� � o o �^ T 7 0 C O m a� m ,p c ti o > 0] o a= �3 ti C d Tj ti W 00 C ao y �w H o O U l z 1 � Q O P °�� 1 � a111, � 1.15 �o C O e N d v` 0 a � � L 14 h - a r 9 a � A E w Ck V7� © E m p ,{ U A u O U C O U h C y N .N A C N U 00 �3 4 0 0 U 010 > O 0. o a b c o 0 N N 3 c ,o m c y m o C N s � d � 0 N N F Ph . u Y VJ � >W 'x o 0 S rz v 1O m? •h m 'c m o � . C N 'O a F o a O U C- e� MEMO � 0 ME a O U ai N A >W >D W > O 4 O W m `o 3 3: 0 c m u W m T m N E E E m O a U U N m _N 3 z W v `m E E U O b W `o a m m c W m a H r 0 � 0 U (� V r 0 0 b O n 0 0 b < n 0 0 b O r 0 0 tO P n 0 0 f0 O r 0 0 � P n n 0 0 0 0 b fD O < n 0 0 b V n 0 0 i0 Q r 0 0 fp O r 0 0 b < n 0 0 b P n 0 0 b P 0 0 1p O 0 0 t0 Q 0 0 h ? 0 0 t� Q 0 0 r < 0 0 V 0 0 V C O O 0 C m m `v W m v` Q c n f o mN m 2 z b N b 10 z Q N ' O trnJ z N M N M P O N 3 N N P r b ? M t�p Olml 3 P N .bj 3 _ N Ip O y N M � M mi M w N m > a b r M W z m > Q N M N M l.Pj Z N V b N w z O OJ b W m > a N N N N W m > Q M N N M W m > a M N N M M a m N r y m o ❑ W P N E JE E d a E i C t O! q N b T N P P A 111 0 M b r N M b m N O r N A N O P CG N M N t(1 N 4 m b M v r P b m P r OI M b M P M M r OI m pp tW 10 e} O r N 6 b N N 10 N m O� N !fl O M n O b IA O m m F m M N b M N a M N rn M N m M N 0 M N rn M N m M N rn M N m M N m M N m M N a M N a M N a M N m M N m M N m M N m M N m M N a M N m M N m E m V a ❑ W J a1 m C Q C O O E � O U W o D W J p ]C N � m m m _W J U Y ❑ W ❑ D � � W U d t N umi m O y O F m a' W a m m J � m p V p p 3 IJO U Z N M P b Im r 41 m O N M P 1p b r b !A O N # N N N di c a rn m a d 0 n d m 5 `o N d 3 0 d u a v d T N m a E E N C 0 m m V m C O _N 3 m _u Z d m m u d` E E 0 u C O N W d C _N d d F N OT C a n O 6 m L d ° E a U C n r A n r r 0 N n 0 r n 0 r n 0° n o ^ n °0 0 N N n- r r 0 0 0 N n r 0 0 N n r 0 0 N n n 0 N r 0 0 0 N r r 0 0 N n 0 0 N r 0 0 v n n 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 N 3 N a O N V N z o z > c y F Q v r 3 N Vl N N O O z z a N Z Z Z Q Q N y N N n y O Z N L r N m Q L t�l r uwi a Q L t7 m 3 w Z > Q 07 3 Z [d Al N i t IW y N r N t 3 Z N m N e e Y! t�f (7 17 N N b e O O e e e h e e e M e t7 N W N 0 W W W t•J l7 N W (9 W W W W W W N [7 N A W W m° U • w a m N a m 3 J m IL C c a d a n C F J m H -mj Iq � y m m � a m L S S a -j Q m J V• Y to N N OT C a n O 6 m L d ° E a U C WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SUPPORT PETITION GROUP 4 (COPIES OF ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, FOLLOWED BY TYPED LIST OF NAMES) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE - CP- 2005 -2 C O U N G d 'in .Y y m � y. N U N 3 E o eD 010 N O O m b O c w O [) N O d c 3 �b Ln O Y o � m A 7 Y V C y Y a� h N V H C h o >, v >� O N3 N b C nt O � b p' O O m 0 a 0 r n O A •� �q, a S C G ` \ L 1 3 s u J , Li , 1 WI IZE ca S . zi _ 0 z O z 3 � , F SS U� i N E o P4 0 U C O U N C n N �m y rn N N F± jU W itl C. U V O 0 U'b U C 0 O_ 4 b y 4 W .0 O N ^� 3 C ,C � C U W y O U w a Y N � O ti Y O � C h O T'b O y3 �b -�0 w C ro O .. y �� b ao �v sw F o A C U MOEN 0 No ON A C U r � U � N r+ Vl y N U �3 fd Q U O o v _o a v y m � W O iu [ 3 L G m _T 7 � 7J � 0 E h � 0 N ao C y O 'CI > it �E a 0 a .= =3 y C p 'O Cd �b 9b m :3 c �0 _: c a � �v a c F o Am O U Fifl C. J t �D Uj a J 111 - ~� bo E J ip � � rA Ln ii 'J� r. rx 1 m qE R Ic kn ' _ QZ Am O U )\ )\ .§ .§ \\ \/ }( �7 \\ )7 {r \� f\ {§ (� �( \ )\ /\ i ---- ME � lit I % \ . \ | >: ! u | yw � \ - |)��)� |', 23 1 - % k a`§ '9 |C m7j \ . \ Ix - /\� W [ u m Yl C 0 10 3 a 0 n m m L O m 0 U m W T a E E m t 0 ti m W c m 3 m m Z W U m E 'm O v a W m C m m W m F C n 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n o 0 r g r o 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 O O r c m v m m a` 9 a m =p ON l7 m m U C o N U mm ONi N 2 m m > m yN t7 m m (7 C 0 N O � W Z m ro m N O ? m W CJ P N ld�l m m Ci C o F n � W m C m m N N � m m C7U C m N aN_� t7 m m C N N M m m (7 C N N tQ�l m v C7 C 0 M w m m d U C 0 m m N V Z m C > 0 N m N N Q 2 m C > o N m N R O Z o c > m o N 1'dl m v m mCm o m N R z m c > 5 N N V Z m > 5 d N m m 0 a m N m m 0 v N E 0 O m EE 0 p - E 0 9 Q m E o t m m 0 EE p m o L m W — N z W = u m � z m E m C O � m a Ej = m C d � m y Q m Q Q m m m m d Q m n m Or N r m N M D7 m m O m N a w m 2 N Q m t�l O fV m r m t7 m d m t�l q N n m O O A o d pl m m o N 69 m m 0 o m r d o m n °o m n Q 4 n o m n NUJ do �i O m mp d m O Ol m n d m m 6 �n a Ol m us m f a N m N m N m N m N m N m N a. N m N rn N rn N N m m N a N N w m N m O N m m N m N N a, N N a m N a N N m N m N N m Z W V m LL m x m N m C Q K m m m .Nai d "W ' -❑ mW m W � W m > o m W C m W Fm - m O m > c J � m C m > m •CC0 m� S m '2 y W U Z5 O J m E Q a W m C CpC _ f F m p ❑ F C 0 N 0 C m am s_ m m f am m C m Y # N M d m m n m m O N t7 Q m m r m at O N N N N c 3 m o. 0 6 m v m L O E qW U 0 r 0 n r 0 0 r 0 0 n o 0 r a 0 r o 0 n 0 0 n o 0 n m 0 r o 0 n 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 n o 0 n O 0 r o 0 m w m m m m 0 m rn m a m rn m 1Il In In Im b 1n 1�f _m 1a Z �i _w Z5 N i° 0 _rn UN In Ri im O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O N m N P N P N P N P N P N Q N Q N Q N Q N Q N P N P N Q N 4 N 4 N d N_ y N_ Q N Q N P V N Z C] N t7 N N N D D w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w W W w W w w w w w w w w w w w w L Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N m D J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J C m J ° m J G m J C m J C m J C m m W L - m m w m m m ' m L m m w - L m L m L m w m L m L m L m L _m w m w m w m w m D U° b P O r b rn O m O O O O O O 4 m r r [7 b r b m N N w w Q m n N 17 n m b 4 w P w w m Ol Cl l7 N O 4 m n m m m N m b Q w w m Q O rn n b o m in o O m n d rn o w n m N N m 4 m b (7 O n b Im b m 1° m b b O b Yl d 17 O N Ih [�1 w N N b N N Q m 17 (7 l7 C1 !7 .O Q Cl f7 w m m m w w w m w w w m rn rn m w m rn m m w w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N K u -oi w v = i o U K u Lul 21 ml n m D c ol 121 21 co � w o .o c m >-I m t U E t m 1 > m > o o �Q{ N Al N N N N N R t7 t7 M O 4 P P V O 3 m 6 O n c m 6 z 0 m m c U C ai N N C m m OI d 3 a m 0 a n d m L 0 N m 3 O yC U d d T m m a d E E m m L_ C O a m N a > (D C O % 3 A N d _U z d m U m E E 0 u m c 0 0 a d 3 a m m c m N m L F c 3 0 m a 0 n c d m O m E d c m m u 0 c WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS VII. PROJECT — POSTCARD MAILING a. Copy of Mailing Letter and Blank Postcard b. Summary of Responses / Results c. Copies of all postcards received by Commissioner Coletta's office as of August 16, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 PROJECT — POSTCARD MAILING Summary of Responses / Results A total of 2,800 t letters and postcards were mailed to Golden Gate Estates residents within the projected service area for the project in April of 2007. A copy of the transmitted letter and sample postcard are enclosed. The postcards were addressed to be returned to Commissioner Coletta's office. A total of 698 postcards were received by Mr. Coletta's office as of August 2007. High Response Rate 25% 95% of postcards received favor development: as follows: • total of 530 postcards (76% of those returned) selected medical or medical and other development • total of 133 postcards (19% of those returned) selected other commercial, ex: grocer and/or hardware store A total of 35 postcards (5% of those returned) were marked "none" or "no development" Overall, a high response rate, one that demonstrates a very positive response from the community. Central Golden Gate Estates Healthcare Medical Center & Office Park At the Southwest Corner of Golden Gate and Wilson Boulevards adjacent to the Walgreens - which is soon to be under construction. This project requires Collier County Board of County Commission approval and needs and deserves your support. Project is anticipated to include an Urgent Care Center and Medical Offices; providing critically needed services for our community. Parcel is presently eligible for a Conditional Use approval for a Church, School or similar use. The proposed Amendment will be a substitution for the current eligibility and will disallow additional commercialization of the Southwest Quadrant of the existing Neighborhood Center at Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards. - ✓ Attend the Public Hearing: ✓ Send your emails to: ✓ Complete & mail ✓ Call or Write your commissioner: Property Owner: Have Questions regarding the project? 9:00 am, Monday, June 4, 2007 Collier County Government Center, Building F, 3'd Floor 3301 East Tamiami Trail com in issioners @coil ieroov. net Enclosed Survey Card Jim Colette, Chairman Board of County Commissioners (239) 774 -8097 Collier County Government Center, Building F, 3`d Floor 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34102 Michael Corder, a Golden Gate Estates resident Call Susan Fariz, (239) 263 -6934 Project Coordinator / Planning Development r w tt� Commercld'Nt:eds Siirvey `Gold tii� k J Golden'GatBBO1I i It Yt: Mw!P O1LLelYC�Y Please mark the boxes that mdicafethe Hof ilettol't°� like to see i Ve the Gtildrti;Gate., �sti"ters ea � ? # C6uten / Placeorwoci ❑ Fast Food / Restaurants ` ❑ Oae Stetioa /:Convenimca store F. ❑ Hardware Store ❑ Medical / Urgent Cam Center Piofessiooet 6inoea ❑ Retail strip cents ❑ Oe m. r a Name &Date r w tt� WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 PROJECT — POSTCARD MAILING Copy of Postcards A total of 530 postcards (76% of those returned) selected medical or medical and other development M F n I Is E —ti ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o El El El El El 1:1 El Rr v w G .. P w T O 6 K CD _ �° o vl ° no a Al ^� A .A .. r^ ti ° .�� .p' rn CL rn CD d is Fo M F� y N O y n3 w 5 a s o 0 v ii F a 4� I a Syr - ❑ 11 El El El n ` z . a w s�. Dw . ✓, ... ? rnt .n. �., m.. G 141 Syr ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ TT ` z . a w s�. y � Z -z q ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ TT ` z . a w s�. no ►. 9 , l 0 x L(,am�.: ? o ° y of eZ CY .per Vi . 0 8 o w m e CD I , m 2 m CD m y � Z -z q ❑ ❑❑❑ to o. Vl d � O A � C y ^ /11 a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ TT z . s�. no ►. 9 , l 0 x CL CY 0 8 o w m e m 2 .y» CD to o. Vl d � O A � C y ^ /11 a n 3 p �a1 -o Ffw w O1 R " ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ JA a r:,- Cj n.� w O1 R " JA a r:,- Cj n.� �r ' w C v o :N a A i i w r a .a g �. (moo k ',m ^ � •�`^ no �]z. � �. � «n.. n ,� T � - O T � � A y G � w m C o ♦ ti ro.Q "❑ ❑ ❑ 0 E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 x n 0 p A m w S a. w a � 6 -�j a w O1 R " a td p w CD C Qi c. b w ^ � a Cs7 G y O C CL r:,- Cj �r ' w C v o :N a A w a .a g �. (moo k ',m ^ � •�`^ no �]z. � �. � «n.. n ,� A � w m C o ♦ ti A a td p w CD C Qi c. b w ^ � a Cs7 G y O C CL i ULD El El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ fD ro ro 3 w El E m Yb ❑ ❑,❑ D o x `P ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ CD w a H y m cc p^ � � cY V n (-7 m 93 i o CD 0 ry N � h b `a El E m Yb ❑ ❑,❑ D o x O 5 (TD y N T �V y ] I P (D � w O O � w o N C R P . Y, H o � w z E: a �� cc a t ] E G1 A m T R � a ti7 n G y O C a `P ❑ ❑ I ❑ O 5 (TD y N T �V y ] I P (D � w O O � w o N C R P . Y, H o � w z E: a �� cc a t ] E G1 A m T R � a ti7 n G y O C a `P ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ CD w a H y w w p^ � a V n � o � h O 5 (TD y N T �V y ] I P (D � w O O � w o N C R P . Y, H o � w z E: a �� cc a t ] E G1 A m T R � a ti7 n G y O C a J 'J? v n Z i .El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o o 0 0 F a G �w WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 PROJECT — POSTCARD MAILING Copy of Postcards A total of 35 postcards (5% of those returned) were marked "none" or "no development" I,- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑' C� z' o� d �p T e iwt Ty W Cr-i p CD O N a ` L n � 'b `C crc. G EL a r4� ` OM :� ; A O co N CL RL ti w y a. a o a O. eyY � H M K � H cGc N G r CD Qt ❑ ❑ o �r ❑ ❑ ❑ El f� ❑ o ". _r . pp$ 4 T e iwt Ty W Cr-i p CD O N a ` L n � 'b `C crc. G EL a r4� ` OM :� ; A O co N CL RL ti w y a. a o a O. eyY � H M K � H cGc N G r ❑ ❑ -Cl E y * ' U LJ .LV r4 J4 �trt5 $yr Y y � fi jfjjt j(��� ❑ . `❑' !IN Y' 5" y * ' U LJ L'1 <il.0 on rn � CD rl In ID5 "p o" KD T p Poll, .,r �, p• e o A to o ^30 H O 0 i a ) I ) i. G G CL y g a C7 < � m v O b � O W 0 a 0 M n N ) I ) i. G G CL i 7�7 F7 CD CO .,,. +. pn r f w �F : m .`" '0' .n ,.i y� t C �n °o w cYI "L q CD CD RL Cb ° o w � �. '—' - Ll i i I i (nV h 4 o y w a a � t < C 1, : u u i- Tj < o cn RL a n a d it o a CT' XO O -:� ZP t0 '' m CD ey: a no C � y � w I o y w a a � t < C 1, : u u ..�. Tj < C e � n c a OL G d 1, : u u ..�. .-� o cn RL a n a d it o a XO ZP m CD ey: a no C T C � G Vl L G J G 0. V p � � d pp ,w, E RIO'' tt`s�arx F, J4 ro w tri C, o tz 0 CD M T �/l a f co �; � •o F w =�; '� to u I To -w- y � CD �p 0 F D y w G G v C 0 �/l a f co I CD an 0 D y w G G 0 c go �/l a a x�' C❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑� N +m i s d z _. ci � 1 to O. RD n V a� 0 q Eg F C G y CL K C Ke b a O 3 o r T qmq mol v a wyy' kt b i tLtlU 3 1. n � El El: El IZX T N �" N 3, v O u V !t O sC I C - V O w O w d.W d i1. f0 O I y N O a y W a C N w. O I- N \ ate+ O d y c U u e� ol ❑S�o ❑,a❑ z v a wyy' kt b i tLtlU 3 1. n � El El: El IZX T N �" N O u V !t O sC I C - V O w O w d.W d i1. O N O N w. O I- N \ ate+ O d y c U v a wyy' kt b O tLtlU 3 1. n � El El: El IZX T N �" N O u V !t O sC I C - O w O w d.W d i1. v a tLtlU 1. ❑ X � El El: El IZX "Z N �" N tv'v'. I v a v S I K "S rT tz ,rya m •�• ,- � K "S rT tz ,rya m •�• 'et° m �• K "S rT a e3`)' ° 0 "$ .� s ti •..��` � �A §fit ;f off', Of El 9y� } q 4 Y h�f�i `y 1Ky � " i "$ .� s ti •..��` � �A §fit ;f dH 9y� } q 4 Y h�f�i `y 1Ky � " i CO fl❑ ❑o a u +� .o z o ❑ ❑ .�u 'O x C].nf f1 a C y ,.� C1 p ey O A n x '�' w f7 S CO xD B ea p rn c C eb co o � a fb j., CT < '-wi `G �• 7' Gi %. ,', _1 'C] < ,y .:� Cam' m A a "3' w,G = m w to iil ti 1 O w D o e O w 0 M w ep m A Vl \ a a G y 0 I it m p �. O � n � T h ii .F YA y '� a A d 5? (D Fa rn to p ; C G y 0 I y m p �. O � n N co y '� a G N. G� � (D Fa rn to p ; C y w m a a EL M � a to o 9 a O m !O A O w ' �. y 1 CD a A b O. 1� m m m A a � y T w \ G V CL G y 0 I y m p �. O N co y '� a G N. G� � (D Fa rn to p ; C y w m a a EL M O !O A O ' �. CD a b 1� G y 0 I y m p �. O N co y '� a G N. G� � (D Fa rn to p ; C G y 0 I i s L S" a~� b ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ky�u � � ❑.� O � CD O(yo ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ n .pA OfD ` S" a~� b ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O � CD .pA ` I c y P R9 N O a CL N V; M A eb'. S" a~� b ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O � CD CD a CL N V; M A eb'. . H w °_ =, a m ;. p O 0 CD G A ` H O G CL 0 CD Y R° p' n :. d y y N Cam. a O o-m j ^y d° b io p' 2 CD f N y y G CD 0 a A o y �, CO,.. 0 CL 0 ^ \ y o tj v ta w a O' a b: ZC n. o co El J& y ^' N O d. fA ryy A n to Ra co FL m 1 M r A x a b < K O w $ A N 0 a a s r.m N � 1y tWr 2�m _ A 7! h f° w w El 0 o co El J& y ^' N O d. fA ryy A n to Ra co FL m 1 <o c 0 b < K O w $ A N 0 a a <o c 0 b < K w $ A N 0 a a ro El F1 El E -El IRI 'Insvilm 6'.1 � w net C; a j �O v = y y r m � R cIr c o: w O C � � o o' � F � O � w m � h � a w o � T N T' 'Insvilm 6'.1 � w net C; a 'Insvilm 6'.1 net j �O v r m cIr c CL o' r ! w o CL m � M y 1 T O c Q. i z ❑ ❑ ❑ m 1 'N, `D J o EL 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w �❑ Q. i J o R C y a 1 EL FO i J o R C y a .El e C El El' ❑ ❑ `° I ` Y ;i J. �Lr R � yy� G � Pn` S. fy m O o G G _ m _ rv, O' O �n -o w v O' CD PC ow a n ti N � � y Pi' w O o o w o' N M h � m b n Y ;i J. �Lr R G � CD .0 o m O G G m O w v CD PC ow a o N rn a O C` as. c C m m � I cc o �y e �trJp C m y 5 � G CrJ Vl d R G w � m O G G ' O C` as. c C m m � I cc o �y e �trJp C m y 5 � G CrJ Vl d � ro it ® ❑ ❑ ❑ © ❑ ❑ o.� r '�M1S 1 - �- -F�-�- Yy�� �•F '�W 1 i - "TL S 4 i • N > '�a G W• iD h � '19 O � a r� M lP p_' o 0.7 O � f4 � A � .d^• � C: uJ :m �� �nn��.:C .' eD CL o n A ' �,� � y a .�.. A eD tb m �. = m M m 'C y I w o o a o �, H O Aca 3 d fD " a a ty1. to o lo 0. ���, •rv' ' � m �, T Pi' ' O s ry o � CD I 'vo Cn � �fY 'k !A F Ol �e.+#5f ),j,L. ✓'`Ya3 kf%3jtiy�� P f9 O C I I d e.('.� e, �..� • s{ *e�.3;�rr> #� er�-�� +'x+,' %ss t � O .o�k'�i ) � r. is S .. ... .. � k 4 SL i l 11111'i �' iml m. ) f rek)V Sb ���, •rv' ' � m �, T Pi' ' O s ry o � CD I 'vo Cn � f9 O C I I d Sb C T co (� a o a n o C) I 'vo Cn � f9 O C I I d i{y o cu N � � O O � 7 r✓ � a w ;a. vm -s e� c tin tr7 p rn °e t to a � N G A O G 0. 1 4 v P Allw' 'a -41 y o'o OD m ol If -; a ,, C v, ?, '.. n cr �' O `ci d° 5 b o .t , ry rn.. C to o• N y m m a Gig 0 A a m < to p/� to O < m xg, �y � ro O G E 0 G R O a a C) R A p e d � O C! G m (gyp CL C=] V w A,,m °o o x N i:Sf9 UL El El EJ 0 \ 0 O m O, �z{ o. = ] n w H w o co y I N_ 7 R � N O O G E 0 G R O a a C) R A p e d � O C! G m (gyp CL C=] V w A,,m °o o x N i:Sf9 UL El El EJ 0 \ 0 O m O, �z{ o. = ] n w H w o co N_ 7 R � N O �' Al � Q m O G E 0 G R O a a C) R A p e d � O C! G m (gyp CL C=] 0 G u 2 C a V o x N i:Sf9 UL El El EJ \ 0 O �y� O, �z{ o. = 9.X, cu n 7 0 G u 2 C a V o x N i:Sf9 a < \ 0 O �y� O, �z{ o. = N n 7 0 G u 2 C a o x n i] < \ 0 O .... O, �z{ o. = n 0 G u 2 C a a b 'A Y V O w ,z m a�` m mt C , rvn a =�,E w - ,� O ra �:: C A m ` n e'tii S p aJ �� '� m b w �•` O t/] CD CD CD ts w \C 1 K y rF t m' G; a' s�x epa� 44fsf may, fi, fy° �- �b'4yMe'Sy ,T"h.i S t tbifc [ `rv) ,: C is N +III i`. �yt ^:. i O .ice• Ltls` ,ika._fy�rb.ii,,rtrt''���ryry�b �k �y+p' l {�i [bH y ;�,_J .r. R� ,� L'i�+b��izWFVUJtr4%b l� ib 5 i wr e v tq ai, r © 3 tk O Ll 1:1 _ H' x p :� y 3. m m �. CCD ego' o' w < F v Gip 00a 5 on p� � � c , A a C a a WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 PROJECT — POSTCARD MAILING Copy of Postcards A total of 133 postcards (19% of those returned) selected other commercial, ex: grocer and/or hardware store C , 3 ny CD p Mq r. N O y eD N p O :x a C , 3 ny CD p Mq O eD ,y CD O N RL C ny CD p Mq O �F '� ❑ � s N W p,�: W w ? S� G y �� pO O w d �i .�• 0. }i+ o a � Y+ p -. _� .�:� T ? o �p N So �F � s N W p,�: W w ? S� G y �� pO O w d �i .�• 0. }i+ �'^ C n � Y+ p -. _� .�:� 6 �p N So Er eb D y N N Ul w° 6�� p a n H y1 i � I � ❑ ❑' L1 o i, z El, ❑ ❑1 s O I n m n O x n H s m � o 1t•. .,rym 7P Ay fG Y.� Gel * "*' ',',,^*� 'w . '.: n +� t . r. p C,' m , . ❑ ;rc+ "cq xs „�y, ; ^§ s+, =a y. '' L :•- x '' v 1.� '�' m l ,wm ap s ,p� ,r.(p xrA I ❑ MO m Y7 � ally � w sal y�v� 4 ° fit.,, Y"tY C ` a; b ". ' { z, r u o �� N ' Not NEI �w1W�rve�s Mg »�,Cr+l Pv.� ' P .P,} a Y A t' p P 7 'U€` M "M.>•�- Xpp+ `' Fi� iN H mys x n O . 1 ♦ ^ ta-*4� b{ t� r� 1 r.��$$fi�4R �; y�i�, mF i � .a _1 r y 1 tl r." 4 2 u iQ�L �. N ✓jay b '� m Yp VAN too CO 0 am a O �. rt A ,�"M fete '. FLA CD € CL I o A w eD ' \ o ID N b s WW ®l y ; _b ti N o m n 1 �- ro .' � `F on MY s�♦ � n ,A G O G� 0 w D y -eD 4rD m CD G� q a` LA CD �- ro .' � `F 4rD CD CD O C A•. r y CL ','W' . y i !y y VI r by c. !y VI by c. c Y „4 rt io +; y o'm c �! g r a44 y xt rn I p y � NK C � �„ R b cl f0 ,cti f0 ,cti �y,y a. l7 C a ^a p w n o �z n io G w p R p� a c' Z ;f E �' y � �w• a �._: .y _ z G o' y m a tv y n. J V z A .pi y �y o F 1r R. t CL l7 C a ^a p w n n R p� a O Z ;f E �' � �w• a �._: .y h'1 to z G m a tv J V A .pi y �y 1r CL El x m ❑ [,❑ C per. ,�y. ° tG A � %S ., .i f�D .�• � CD - � � tD J O 4r t� �.. N F d ° w ° co �B � C per. ,�y. ° tG A � %S ., .i f�D .�• � CD - � � tD J O 4r t� �.. N. A.. C CL C u k 4 f L b w'd r m� S o. y� w ktl nOr r '� m Z /n/�,.x v� OR to a a to rn T� w Ct A m m Ct 1 _b f� Nu i N p ^7 C � N T H a 0 G a 0 � N n s N v. .^ mid 9t6<. a r n f: t 1 n G a L m Z /n/�,.x v� OR to a a to rn T� w Ct A m m Ct 1 _b f� Nu i N p ^7 C � N T H a 0 G a � � N x s v. .^ mid 9t6<. aya r n m Z /n/�,.x v� OR to a a to rn T� w Ct A m m Ct 1 Q f� Nu i N p ^7 C � N T H a 0 G a F x s v. .^ mid 9t6<. aya n f: t C3 G n 44, T7 1 n � x'59 O W a S 1 M 5i i rn m Z /n/�,.x v� OR to a a to rn e w Ct A m m Ct 1 Q f� N p ^7 C � N T H a 0 G a m H M T A eD H �b \ y CD 4 N c 7 ° o . Mx �' rn .. � s n 40'' A P• .� " °' w ° C. S..� O C Vi O cr m � �. gn. CD o CD 4 N c a o 4, � c rw e m C0 rn c < C m m o T C gyp`, G y C. a Lj z.. C lui w ,C,i a s '� a .,y -, � :o..:• c w ,., cY .. o ..� � 3. � � '. o' a ro Yj$x�`u3i r d 'n' S4C y; N p CD C Vl [D ' A6 S o N cv w m OVi H 0 y q m ,A f. V rw e m C0 rn c < C m m o T C gyp`, G y C. a i H �y INt z x n hi ^"3 . f0. �° w• �; a rn m n .to Zlo IrD ,. w° cr pj ° ' n•; H `° - 'A o txo .d., r "b Yom• t A iN '. IFi� ii y �a^ n ? /}'1 � - ��• X ',o m N21 R .t !, �- o H •� A CL a P. lip (D y N fin RE c4 o p a. a ro 11 O So r� m 'w N � U �• g w a cp w t7lxo ,F„ m C m m � CD I ( n c -0 m ti Li r. 1 G O r� N � �• n a .� �'' rya � J n c -0 m r. 1 9 x o, c. ro ❑ ^, �. co o Z. N w N O 1 � CL CD ~ v° n O C m d (mil O G CL ro ❑ ❑'' o Z. N 1 � � CD ~ m d (mil m a CD p U 0. T . A o a i CD a Cl7 m m G w p G 0. o (D y A a l� G C i CD a Cl7 m m G w p G 0. F,= 77 .777 •ti ❑; ❑ Cam.❑ ❑ ❑ � � `� o� A' y w� r— H � m� �• . A N CL tD co CD 1-4 a p m O to S N f. a rt i1 v, =;2, El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m f m w o � ❑ ❑ El ❑ ro o m .S ti�. 1j c iii � Z a rr^^ rn N (9" .fD �" ,�t:l - � .�. �... �s_x�,r .•w 7;'n�. C�f l7: %..�.5 'n r� :. �.�-6 E': � '�1 �. "ti =. _ >;��. . rt i1 v, =;2, CD O m a rr^^ �H E. ca 5 � %� � � ^�~ � � \� \ � � ®/% � �� � \\ .: � � � � } � � >��d� » � v2� � � » <422� � � � � }� " %2© w»< - �. ■ � � }� \� � � � \� � � � .: v \�� « » . � \ \� ��. . /� . ? «< � <i« �� <��. � �� \� .. < .... . <. � to Y4 o CD w. to w .r N y ti n a e MOP- CL m •�� N C,. O w o r q•"k�q s y 'kw G,, F�' = I r.+' w d m Gl I'JT w p R tTl V m u O YD ❑ rp IAOL H I n C i.�.�.r � R'1 1 J _ R CD Izi 0. xr011 Y ro x pint a- a�Vi y ) °p wi � a C s p 'q ' W ! t✓r `09 A .`Ta s 2 49 X ID 6' I T( w �+ '� +7 _+. r•'@ ., s 5'ur A µ Y se Rr'4 Y #,(3rs' a y€a p€ a r " � = .' �� C :`• 4�'f"'�Y ��': O ; 5i xrvF�� . S ' �j ig.hn ✓'v �,vr s y r ua ". W � � w � m ys 'r5`Y rni3� s aka Y 9ova r°SK §^ VN� ' s zrx a.11 t, ttli r ' •a fi°-0f 5 �o'rt ??i4�i ;A�`A" , ?.; Zlsd , {�rw' *y� 'G wY L - Kt* •rt k � w .rte✓ yfi�v T ' rPS �' pax _ TSra�� "�nSL�! �. 8Fx yk 4 ,. to wi Sy ?a ,' 2zr J tg 'i. r� -n.�'i tt Pr� -rv��ry x y i Y� yu r fj z umr• ! ` `C ems+ s yya "+*k"^fD r IN If lg-ity F�h�+«� �v-•3 ""� _ ! i�t i ? "' � x Y lc3, f- „��5"�+' '. h gyp y a3 a . - # € zY ma b vY = x x .W Y = aFri tl Lt !_.« es Y: •r;:: P 'i”' : INN It k +Y aa�c¢� ro cm +ri6n4tFi r - v `� - 4i h" i w" T rn 5 c° .� m a �i' ❑ w O 1 "Ro lR d� a to ^cf N _X rtAn tv d 5 w 0— CL lb N (p C W O r n O y < o t,= G O j _ a m o a, J CD n N os . G', G H ' m ctl a m pa tz pa w, r .r n f p k 9� Sties .- A •'iJ ¢Y' p ' 120,1 4 NQ 9 yL N C�pll u!'L� G �ffi r "* n �# �F.' §�° ➢ z �y�'i,� !°a�kF j ���e �js Ny,: � �� �'�-i �° t �+�zc •,�� s�5+`e•. ��mS���fx �'�'k1^Y � p .� jj� F' � w.. � ,a'., o � 'sq„yt'" a "t� � �£n+sSr2 ��: %z '+ ? .,ti '� � �` Z�� ° P" ►. w t"o - w o � � � o a 14 -nas't *' ''E Mozr.�, # ✓yr'sy>am to Ja I - y C � w m . i � 7 r w°' E ffin fNrl N C � � I wo Via. A m ° to o° `m A K G a w oil ri,.'.Zb7m 4r-9 1`• C)nbAY "x .. .r �. �D,. m o F y:, E O C. a ' MS, b tj a o F y:, E O C. a �+ � w� r � {�f° v .;. w '£� d �; ': � u, �`�- '� f> :. m � 5 � '•`1 s � � i i.� is ° c CD 7 ti m All m i �t ro � FeA1 a.:: r�X ysxa �P� 0 k, zr a t,ro e s S' x � ° s+�� %� n w :. F` � r;c � v tC'J � ,�'+�'"'� yn *�'"y� '� ,� i t ex '�`�.d� •N �.i +'i', L7 „n n � '�" v � :. ,y ip'c'S33ii' �" rn �'�wia a '4M is x S 3�'a6NY - �� ' y 1 i ✓n4�. E .�'..?' t i v A ) "_. S $' Rf n _�L `� l M, ,p T ✓< r, _. rs , ti rYk' .rye , . r`"3 ;q�M ^'Rr t( 1..A .A`.A � ��YN y t'�, �� t� ��r 't£e,t (:("�+"`�'ro �a`c§n�3 :J 4y �k e " #�y r-rXa i°"�'•°`�yrK -W � 4 � t i,�,,y� 34 'R'` 7 : R i v��rS.HI i� �Ai i c t n N +N tee is IP el q� Me"� a as In is gaill r'"Srdtk '' t ry t �ft� r +3y, ,j -, ' iKa3�.t 14 q Mw k '?n t t kA'r a: R " k nq� t1 d4i1n, Gx yfiL `�,t„b F S + 2 R d f F54 v C �f]C g� ✓ 2 s _MX A a 1 a t 1• a $Fri '1 5 x,h42f ;.ea',�S�tn 7 a .hAugpx.�,�,tet t�yJ:kl't ,Y a '❑ . '� ❑ 3 t �� ti 4A , ❑.��❑ i ib" }r AO~ h tt t Y !7 ,. .� h ji w 0 ' "S in F',k".� �x� C i/] � y� `•t�i � t ^T !�'1 ' t .wi. u '� +� 50 o y rn � m <. 7 r-. �,A fG. m vs,� m Z. SRF:' t4a� A .to ay r%i yrw �:. tr• ' '. A _ I, o .� ! . A A 1 T .E a qz, C "j> d.3y R x Rs, .ev. M _ Y My t r 5 C d t f* 3 t kres r M n i r VCr�p ^', 7 S+ '`m ° t? CD El ID .CD cr- , o CD CL d ry .�y m " e ,s O `y 7 ,r a " ❑ o �N .mr fzD m 0 CD O. M j' y no I ° w... n ^ p CL eD CL tz r 0 b 7X �p rn W z.o r„ a o qz, C "j> d.3y R x Rs, .ev. M _ Y My t r 5 C d t f* 3 t kres r M n i r VCr�p ^', 7 S+ '`m ° t? CD El ID .CD cr- , o CD CL d ry .�y m " e ,s O `y 7 ,r a " ❑ o �N .mr fzD m 0 CD O. M j' y no I ° w... n ^ p CL eD CL tz r 0 t �ro F7 w �o tw? O M/ C> iTj �aa J J J u b � K m (9 R a M y G K a G y ®: ❑ ❑ b � K m (9 R a M y G K a G y b � K m (9 R a M y G K a C m m CD °I x� °0 «' ,a �.?x' r fr.7 g ,$° a(q� Q r : � Al- M. 13 o y w F r� xE TO Yi w M"R�fulf o ens Aims' 'd w S a f�"Tm S s Fi r4 �Jp �WW z� li t a x a J }� , ryYrot b C, t ° i . AX, 5N{'tp 3011, All I €Yi"'rt 4'$ s av`i1' S X04`5" fNlt tlii�.,,R ,t yin g�N �'Ti3 'C ra t. tc a n n,` ' � "' a ea a .+r?- ` d r 'F �' n � +5^ 4�E!�a� dF� ' �S w � � $ -r <a a •t y '"3`" i o- G �+ s x� � r� (� u"'� f .v,i n F f� `� '� �.' ,� �(s vi � ak• e'_ : t i e � *a r t f E �.❑ f ❑'❑ El z '© ❑ ❑ ❑ © fl CD tr gn ''. 7"+ k��`'v���� nx�E x ,� � ('I � gam• ii I. �p ''m m `c R .wn ,d". c y ,� O e ro �O n � $ CD ►:` CD CL w CD r i:' .O M ,o 'b 10 w moo. G. R' f 1� F� E ❑ El IN, El o z w o X1 o w o S•' , w � � o y to ,to � N r _ � 0. •� R7 � . CD lo R G G y o, a � C CL tort, kV P ❑'�+ Cb .a N R Y R YD d J iii, .F �. a '✓] ti � � C�f CD y tv CD ? � w gi ° o C R +A .0 ..Rp n to �.;W K .G A C a Cb d iii, .F �. a '✓] R7 � � C�f Er gi R +A .0 ..Rp n to �.;W 1• n N ' "Ctl .d . .� O:^ � 4= I/l a -; i � y'y" YAV 8 i 1 q � .' P C' . � � � .� � ��a ✓' � S N. ��p, - �O r ,T O CD 1 , C -,CD _ � I ,.: �.. °' .,, ;° ❑ iii EL Wo w a FT -T-1 Fl . . . . . . . . . . Yn CD, 4; IS A. 3 y i0�., Q] ^ rry � -: � �'� � N' '�� ��. o, f � � m e�Zo � rn � w �P• a �� C Go - � ti any N n �: � " , ; , �. `d i..,�� � � .� � ro KY El ❑ . -� -- ry 0 Z O "rn -Q 0 C'! k p ,:eC6C 14 x no to -°• 4aD o is m � � +,p. CD �n o' U (p w o «„ c m f�D ° a� m CL A H � � C O O m q�' G N KY El ❑ . -� -- ry 0 Z KY El 0 w -Q 0 n 4aD CD o' w o «„ c ° CL A H � C O m N G A � O ' . o a v� _ a Q V a N (p Lt 0 ti ac G N G a, Lt ac w 0 F 1� bo v m FYo Q N cC C l� G y b. t to? in i m S � o M ,.0 C. � O O G F a C ^^1� b ` } i O G F 0 C .-M N y .. CD, m p a � t �'t b =ice •�� n 6 � � R VSO p '. EL ❑ O 0. V� R f»9 N X A w^ G CD w m 'J ❑ -0 ry �+ n A r a .. l r. p FP a W p y C n � C C ^^1� b ` } i O G F 0 C .-M N i� S Sy f r € t. sy',ud h rv^-s yas x'Xsro 7" ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A y v� s.yw N +F - (9 ' 0 �,: cam w xE o° o' d 'AN � x o rA � � � �•,T�''O +i d0.' n - T Y 1 ❑� as ,o > A h , ;ii A¢ e t m,`' s` %+ia. ,aY .�€ us °�, +y .( O.a5e? 'tiO vtv' A { 'rx xi'a^i%ROek�Yf�H' {t. O v. Vw 4 ', l 0. �o- CT- .. w.t GF �(��`V� xltuiav d s 3 � a� ,y tx #k5 �x4 4r✓G'¢ � d' � F i@� e �� s. � �&€ �h? F ! � a x i l iW >x��.4� ><- � ,ry`� at' �r� ❑ ❑ '� ❑'�, ��❑ XraExi �N Ygrr i m w 57 Q rA CD CD �.t � C Kn °a '_v �,. a. c .� x.a � .• A ...; c y c � m a y, , A A P ,i A p.� w n '. n� y v r r 7 m vN ,_! � 0 7 O. N� A• 'fAD s: 1 n T o c"o cb, A p o a m as o o. { ci aoA CL CD o a m m a a 0� b � , ,� ip N � A 4 w � R � p^ � � � N � CL �• ' o by 'O N 5 ti r a �' AD CD tqo m m m o < CD a y cb y , o I a� 'E C. W *+ � m O t � tOO � k A' iE � 2 _ m f" i � �'. •. _'• d .'. o -. N N 4 a S N 0 i IT r t ,LOO. „. ao 1 � y R� .� w rf "�S 9 `•'. d�aA ���• 5 1^ N d w b � C y O ma- i N CD to' go O C no o a ; 0 yx ❑ � ..."+ O fit. I.r t ,LOO. „. ao 1 � .•� R� .� w y "�S �4 `•'. d�aA ���• 5 1^ N d � C y O ma- CD to' go no o a ; 0 yx ❑ � ..."+ O fit. I.r rA io..,y 'pro TI, 1 m 5 � a 1 � �iY I rd� . •r 1 � K F � � � �q ..,��.. rev. ..... . - 1 °' § ...: :ae �..g....... ��..........�...... Ly ;o � n l� tv ° Ct w ,e. r. ce. P c R h s N y rn? P o y a N Z(r Ly ;o � n l� tv ° Ct w ,e. r. N y a nl a EJ 11 A; x4 IF �15 olg Hill@ Wj INI FOE V, xr mzll,;� -V I ;,x A, 4 M ,q" q�% -ct ti 0 no 0 �M� 0 RE 0 o" ti 0 ti ,a, -t _m d � T E % fA +C p, G c v rn a n < c o R \ VVV111 � R v M y R o V ,a, -t _m d � T E % fA +C p, G n < ,a, -t _m d � T E % fA +C p, G a n Q' R K L y d � H E O +C p, ti .n .j, ��v . ate.. ,,� `s t .�C4,. fi, .� G'. �^-�• a4. °..- n'r.c ,•` is S'y%aCl' .^ �-' to A ,0 � a U14i y w ro ti CD w _ � rya d .. 0, G. rlj \ 43 < ��.D.y `r p,T Gy INJk T ' a P w N y eti ;a � a y L - w �-4 ry CD ts G1 co Vi T n T v � � E G:# i i I f3. i P N � a y L - w �-4 ry CD ts co Vi T n T � � E i i I T77,-�: �.—�I rte, r-� r� r� •N ` �. w: a rn o N w ao C7 y° ,' ry VL s � � � ❑ CD , A j }n CD td ", M o Q, a 1 -Mrt- � � } � } y �` \� i 1 '' S ° N ' -� . ❑ O f�1r9 is � yAy tv tea; v o T DW iA G r m T.: : } CL Co t Q: A G a l _ f x tiT ' p S x4•q. `ir 1 a i�Z Q � A V a r -_ s 1 G a l f tiT ' S `ir 1 a i�Z Q � A V 0 s ry C y ^ o n CD y _ rn .CD o: y 4 � y o w '^ CA M a G a l S Q � A V 0 G a l rz n r n Fl � ee tl b fD t O ct `a' O y � ee tl b fD t O `a' ^t D R 6 1 '.; 66-1 a %'• c�1 Y b �$ . r�r�'�4 � rc. +�. �����F� x��. S'� � �,.i"�,ar+�fc �`, �'a �'� py•�ll' °. 4 {t{ l r b?„I � ': "%��[9w+?r' �lkmi C .rd�'!A'�+' ✓ .3Yf ka4 Aif-a y'rW �"'y 7,e� N � � '� & �"s I �r Iti- le M 4 r Yip nF t QrakR m lC it, ,'„pai A CV fi a eo CD a; r cc o p rb so N ..91 i El El. IM FT O p CD an S 7 CD w N ,ti CD a p o.. CD CL 'n N o p w o' . TV m E G1 n w CD m a CD �l. a CL TV n w CD �l. a rn 1 f tu. ...I 0 po o ce i EL y C y r K O � c a \r \ � rn 1 f C I� v AJ Ll ? C 0 n> < � s may'\ o M .Ce m h w G C I� v AJ Ll n V1 'T A � y � Fi' o A e ° ?y w N `< 0 a . Cn a El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ : t,�sp'"m' "Yq 5 Bi. ; o **11�d "3 • P w p, ". h A .d P. Ro. 'O , 3 o "dc o C ti ❑ � � O Grn , ° ] n M CD F°on zz 1V� � a M. t \ H z c a: Epup-nM402 Moo ra V: � n y o y � , M ^ A 4 O , � ra y � , M ^ y � a V r U b 0 > b v ° o � K 4. 7 yyC +t d G � R Q o a V r U d > b v ° 4. +t cd � �„ ._ a V r U d > b v ° 4. cd 'C c m. d y h U U b K U U U YO. 00 N LUd. 4 m: v y ❑ ❑' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑,'Wr IT a a V r U WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION EXHIBITS / BASE DOCUMENTS VIII. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC SUBMITTALS MADE AT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 59 2007 Submitted and Presented by Mr. Mark Teaters a. Copy of Invitation Letter to May 30, 2007 Neighborhood Meeting of Immediately Adjacent Property Owners b. Copy of List of Meeting Attendees c. Copy of Email Letter of Support GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 GmP (nl�(o-) C(Z To all residents who live on Wilson Blvd. South or V' Street SW A special neighborhood meeting has been planned to discuss the proposed Medical /Professional project on the southeast corner of 1" Street SW and Golden Gate Boulevard. The residents on South Wilson, and Is' St. SW are the most immediately affected by this proposed project. This proposal is scheduled to go before the Collier County Board of County Commissioners early in .tune. Our Commissioners will welcome the input from us, and take it into serious consideration. At this meeting, we as the affected neighbors will discuss the details of the project, and one of the members ofthe Golden Gate Master Plan Committee will attend to answer your questions. Many of us who live in Golden Gate Estates are concerned about the lack of essential services in our area. It is important that we make sure to have responsible and quality commercial growth. We have to weigh all of the factors because recently all eyes are on the remaining commercial property that is available in our area. I I'we aren't careful we could end up with a bunch of strip malls and still not get the important services that residents have been asking for. We need your input, PLEASE XcrEND THIS MEETING! If you can't attend, please e -mail your thoughts to estateslivingoaol.com. Please provide your name & address so we can be sure that we are getting the true feelings of our neighbors. THE MEETING Golden Gate Estates Library meeting room. Wednesday, May 30. 6:30 PM The library is on the Corner of 13`x' Street and Golden Gate Boulevard. Please arrive early to get a seat. Bring this invitation with you, we will be having a straw poll of the people who live on these 2 streets. Come be an important part of the decision making process. Elope to see you there! Name Baker, Jim Garafola, Denise Perez, Isabel Minyard, Dan Mindy Russo Nelson Carol E. Ogden, Les Teaters, Mark Eisele, Ruth / Gina Hartman, Linda Michael Corder Michael Fernandez Neighborhood Meeting May 30 Address 840 Wilson Blvd S 200 Wilson Blvd S 110 Wilson Blvd S 290 Wilson Blvd S 710 Wilson Blvd S 330 Wilson Blvd S 271 Wilson Blvd S 140 Wilson Blvd S 810 Wilson Blvd S Golden Gate Mast( Petitioner Project Engineer Telephone 643 -0931 353 -9520 304 -2608 304 -4426 353 -5651 304 -0047 348 -8589 307 -1817 304 -1888 w Plan Committee E -mail provided Ct? AOL Email Page 1 of 2 UL- Crab Subj: My vote �IO� Date: 5124/2007 7:56:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time From: MRusso0154 To: Estatesliving, MTeaters I'm sorry we won't be able to attend the meeting, but I would like to express our opinion towards the development of the property on Golden Gate Blvd. south side between Wilson and 1st. We are for and approve of a medical facility in that location. It would certainly be an asset to out area to have medical services available. It would be our preference, rather that another strip mall. Mindy & Robert ( Chris) Russo 710 Wilson Blvd. South 239 353 -5651 Tuesday, June 05, 2007 America Online: MTeaters CP- 2005 -2 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER APPENDIX Complete — Original GMP Amendment Application / Submittal and Resubmittal Exhibits TABLE OF CONTENTS / EXHIBITS - Containing the Following L Completed Application II. Table of Contents / Index of Exhibits III. Exhibits (numerically referenced accordingly by the application) A. Project Team — List of Consultants B. Legal Description C. Amended Language D. Land Use 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Zoning Map 4. Summary Table of Land Use E. Future Land Use Designation 1. Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map 2. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map # 9 3. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map #10 F. Environmental 1. Environmental FLUCCS Map 2. Historic and /or Archeological Sites 3. Survey of Endangered/Threatened Wildlife and Plant Species — June 2006 G. Growth Management — Density and/or Intensity to Land Uses Narrative 1. June 6, 2006 — Supplemental Response Information H. Public Facilities 1. Level of Service Analysis 2. Traffic Impact Statement 3. Supplemental Traffic Comments Response — July 28, 2006 4. Public Facilities Map 5. Public Facility Service Providers 1. Other 1. FIRM Map 2. Wellfields and Cone of Influence Map J. Supplemental Information I . Copy of Check for Filing Fee 2. Copy of Deed 3. Letter of Authorization WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CP- 2005 -2 SECTION I COMPLETED APPLICATION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DA' DATE SUFFICIENT PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (941)403 -2300; Fax: (941)643 -6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97- 431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941 - 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Michael Corder Company Mailing Address 3821 3rd. Avenue SW City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34117 Phone Number 239 - 354 -5622 Fax Number 239 - 354 -5622 B. Name of Agent' Michael Fernandez. AICP / Planning Development Incorporated THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company /Firm Planning Development Incorporated Mailing Address 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239 - 263 -6934 Fax Number 239 - 263 -6981 Email Address PDIMRF(@aol.com C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Michael Corder Mailing Address 3821 3rd. Avenue SW City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34117 Phone Number 239 - 354 -5622 Fax Number 239 - 354 -5622 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership -- Michael Corder 100% B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. N/A Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address N/A G. Date subject property acquired (X) 09110104 and 05/26/05 leased ( ):_Terms of lease _ yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Ill. DESCRIPTOIN OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description See attached Exhibit B B. Section: 09 Township: 49 South Range: 27 East C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 37169480000. 37169440008 & 37169560108 D. General Location Southeast corner of Golden Gate Blvd & 1s` St SW E. Planning Community F. TAZ G. Size in Acres 6.92 t acres H. Zoning Estates I. Present. Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Golden Gate Estates IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: Future Land Use Immokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage X Golden Gate Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) 33 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element As Follows: (Use Cross throughs to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See attached Exhibit C C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Estates Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict District, Subdistrict [If new District and/or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it). D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) E. Describe additional changes requested: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" _ 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8'/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. Exhibit D.1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. Exhibit D.2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. Exhibit D3 & 4 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. Exhibit E Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. Exhibit F.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMM (FLUCCSCODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AEIRAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. NONE Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). 3. Exhibit F. 2 Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. No Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)Ta, F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. No Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. No Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. No Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. YES — Exhibit G Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district/subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Exhibit H Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) Exhibit H.1 Potable Water b) Exhibit H.1 Sanitary Sewer c) Exhibit H.2 Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS d) Exhibit H.1 Drainage e) Exhibit H.1 Solid Waste f) Exhibit H.1 Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. Exhibit H.3 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services). 4. Exhibit HA Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. Exhibit 1.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 2. Exhibit 1.2 Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Exhibit J.1 $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. N/A $9,000.00 non- refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. TBD Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. Exhibit J.2 Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. Exhibit J.3 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. X 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shal be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Michael R. Fernandez, AICP / Planning Development Incorporated to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting the property identified in the Application. Si P//— �� Date: �� " O — Michael A. Corder I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF ( COUNTY OF ( Co \l , e � ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 20o6- By <=C 4 (Not ublic) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: �t— who is personally known to me, and who has produced did take an Oath did not take an Oath Michael R. Fernandez President of A!PV,1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ReUy = ��pPY•'�B -; Foote f=MhSlou # DD340454 •o p�' &rpires: JULY 22, N08 " AAPONNOTA.RY.com as identification NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statue Section 837.06 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 02/2002 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT A PROJECT TEAM LIST OF CONSULTANTS GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 EXHIBIT A GENERAL INFORMATION: D. Project Team List of Consultants PLANNING: Planning Development Incorporated Michael Fernandez, AICP Project Manager 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 Naples, Florida 34103 (239) 263 -6934 (239) 263-6981 fax TRANSPORTATION: Metro Transportation Group, Inc. Robert Price Project Contact 12651 McGregor Blvd, Suite 4 -403 Ft. Myers, Florida 33919 -4489 (239) 278 -3090 (239) 278 -1906 fax ENVIRONMENTAL: Collier Environmental Consultants Marco Espinar Project Contact 3880 Esrey Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 263 -2687 (239) 263 -6616 fax WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. Legal Description The North '/� of Tract 124, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 12, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND The South 1/2 of Tract 124, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND The North 150' of Tract 126, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT C AMENDED LANGUAGE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION This designation is characterized by low density semi -rural residential lots with limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However, there are some legal non - conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Intensifying residential density shall not be permitted. The Estates Designation also accommodates future non - residential uses including: • Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, • Parks, open space and recreational uses, • Group Housing shall be permitted subject to the definitions and regulations as outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991 and consistent with locational requirements in Florida Statutes (Chapter 419.01 F.S.). • (1) Schools and school facilities in the Estates Designation north of 1 -75, and where feasible and mutually acceptable, co- locate schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible. Group Housing includes the following type facilities: • Family Care Facility if occupied by not more than six (6) persons shall be permitted in residential areas. • Group Care Facility, • Care Units, • Adult Congregate Living Facilities, and • Nursing Homes. All of the above uses shall be consistent with all of the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. a. Estates -Mixed Use District (VIII)1) Residential Estates Subdistrict - Single- family residential development may be allowed within the Estates -Mixed Use District at a maximum density of one unit per 2% gross acres unless the lot is considered a legal non - conforming lot of record. (VI) 2) Neighborhood Center Subdistrict - Recognizing the need to provide basic goods, services and amenities to Estates residents, Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Neighborhood Center designation does not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the opportunity to request commercial zoning. (VI) a) The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to provide rural design criteria to regulate all new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. (111)(V)(VI) b) Locations Neighborhood Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. (See Map 9). The (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 32 centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. Four Neighborhood Centers are established as follows: • Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 10). The NE and SE quadrants of the Center consist of Tract 1 and 2, Unit 14, Tract 17, Unit 13 and the western half of Tract 18, Unit 13 Golden Gate Estates. The NE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is approximately 8.45 acres. The parcels within the NE quadrant shall be interconnected and share access to Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard to minimize connections to these two major roadways. The SE quadrant of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards is 7.15 acres, allows 5.00 acres of commercial development, and allocates 2.15 acres to project buffering and right -of -way for Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4.98 acres in size and consists of Tract 144, Unit 11 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 4:@611178 acres in size and consists of Tracts 124, 125, and the north 150 feet of Tract 126. Unit 12 of Golden Gate Estates. • Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road Center. The center at Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road is located on both sides of the intersection. Tracts 109 -114, Unit 26, Golden Gate Estates are included in this center as eligible for commercial development. (See Map 11). The E112 of Tract 107, Unit 26 is also included within this center but is only to be used for buffer, water management and open space. • Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. This Center consists of all four quadrants at the intersection of Everglades and Golden Gate Boulevards (See Map 12). The NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates. The SE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 97, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. The NW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 76 of Golden Gate Estates. The SW quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size and consists of Tract 96, Unit 81 of Golden Gate Estates. • Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center. The Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard Center is located in the SW and SE quadrants of the intersection (see Map 13) and the parcels lie east and south of the Fire Station. The portion of the Center lying south of the Fire Station is approximately 5.15 acres in size and consists of Tract 128, Unit 47. The southeast quadrant of the Center, lying east of the Fire Station is approximately 4.05 acres in size and consists of Tracts 113 and 16, Unit 46. 33 (1)(V)(VI)(VIII) c) Criteria for land uses at the centers are as follows: • Commercial uses shall be limited to intermediate commercial so as to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic. These uses shall be similar to C -1, C2, or C -3 zoning districts outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102, adopted October 30, 1991), except as prohibited below. • The Neighborhood Center located at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Collier Boulevard may be developed at 100% commercial and must provide internal circulation. Any rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. This Neighborhood Center may also be utilized for single - family residential or conditional uses allowed in the Estates zoning district such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities. • Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard, Golden Gate Boulevard and'Everglades Boulevard, Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road may qualify for Conditional Use under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master Plan Element. • A single project shall utilize no more than 50 % of the total allowed commercial acreage. This percentage may be increased at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. The project shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments. Access points shall be limited to one per 180 feet commencing from the right -of- way of the major intersecting streets of the Neighborhood Center. A maximum of three curb cuts per quadrant shall be allowed. • Driveways and curb cuts shall be consolidated with adjoining developments, whenever possible. • Driveways accessing parcels on opposite sides of the roadway shall be in direct alignment, except when the roadway median between the two parcels has no opening. • Projects shall provide a 25 -foot wide landscape buffer abutting the external right - of -way. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 25 -foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 25 -foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. Water retention /detention areas shall be allowed in this buffer area if left in natural state, and drainage conveyance through the buffer area shall be allowed if necessary to reach an external outfall. (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 34 • For Tract 114, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 26, access shall be restricted to 11th Avenue S.W. Also, vehicular interconnection shall be provided to the adjacent property(s) in the Pine Ridge Road /Collier Boulevard Neighborhood Center. • All buildings shall have tile roofs, `Old Style Florida' metal roofs, or decorative parapet walls above the roofline. The buildings shall be finished in light, subdued colors, except for decorative trim. • Building heights shall be limited to one (1) story, with a maximum height of thirty - five (35) feet. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • All lighting facilities shall be architecturally — designed, and shall be limited to a height of twenty -five (25) feet. Such lighting facilities shall be shielded from neighboring residential land uses. • Commercial uses shall encourage pedestrian traffic through placement of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and marked crosswalks within parking areas. Adjacent projects shall coordinate placement of sidewalks so that a continuous pathway through the Neighborhood Center is created. • All buildings and projects within any single specific quadrant of the Subdistrict shall utilize a common architectural theme. This theme shall be applicable to both building design and signage. • No building footprint shall exceed 5,000 square feet, unless the project is submitted in the form of a PUD. Walkways or courtyards shall connect adjacent buildings. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Drive - through establishments shall be limited to banks, with no more than 3 lanes; the drive - through areas shall be architecturally integrated with the rest of the building. This provision only applies east of Collier Boulevard. • Fences or walls may be constructed on the commercial side of the required landscape buffer between adjacent commercial and residential uses. If constructed, such fences or walls shall not exceed five (5) feet in height. Walls shall be constructed of brick or stone. Fences shall be of wood or concrete post or rail types, and shall be of open design (not covered by slats, boards or wire). Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E- Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy -five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty -five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The native vegetation retention area may consist of a perimeter berm and be used for water management detention. Any newly constructed berm shall be revegetated to meet subsection 3.9.5.5.6 of the LDC (native vegetation replanting requirements). Additionally, in order to be considered for approval, use of the native vegetation retention area for water management purposes shall meet the following criteria: (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 35 a. There shall be no adverse impacts to the native vegetation being retained. The additional water directed to this area shall not increase the annual hydro - period unless it is proven that such would have no adverse impact to the existing vegetation. b. If the project requires permitting by the South Florida Water Management District, the project shall provide a letter or official document from the District indicating that the native vegetation within the retention area will not have to be removed to comply with water management requirements. If the District cannot or will not supply such a letter, then the native vegetation retention area shall not be used for water management. C. If the project is reviewed by Collier County, the County engineer shall provide evidence that no removal of native vegetation is necessary to facilitate the necessary storage of water in the water management area. • Projects within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict that are submitted as PUDs shall provide a functional public open -space component. Such public open -space shall be developed as green space within a pedestrian - accessible courtyard, as per Section. 2.4.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as in effect at the time of P.U.D. approval. • The following principal permitted uses are prohibited within Neighborhood Centers: Drinking Places (5813) and Liquor Stores (5921) Mail Order Houses (5961) Merchandizing Machine Operators (5962) Power Laundries (7211) Crematories (7261) (Does not include non - crematory Funeral Parlors) Radio, TV Representatives (7313) and Direct Mail Advertising Services (7331) NEC Recreational Shooting Ranges, Waterslides, etc. (7999) General Hospitals (8062), Psychiatric Hospitals (8063), and Specialty Hospitals (8069) Elementary and Secondary Schools (8211), Colleges (8221), Junior Colleges (8222) Libraries (8231) Correctional Institutions (9223) Waste Management (9511) Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. (VII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 36 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT D LAND USE Location Map Aerial Zoning Map Summary Table of Land Use GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 I IIL -I I IF 7MM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTSI`-7,�,! , COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING\ STAFF WORK MAP 01 s. q, IN fjJ, k7' R 25 E R 26 IE sire ru O r B-H IIL -I I IF 7MM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTSI`-7,�,! , COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING\ STAFF WORK MAP 01 s. q, IN fjJ, k7' R 25 E R 26 IE sire ru O W = a s Z V� W W v N Y C W J Wy=pj d'; 0 ; y � uo a= a _ Sb �4 a V z € „o S LS 1 I y w F _ W v G W W m) m d b M d m __ - 98UnTtpB WSJ,, 3' � a I � d � _ O lU Z W = a s Z V� W W v N Y C W J Wy=pj d'; 0 ; y � uo a= a _ Sb �4 a V z € „o S LS 1 I y N w 0 Ot a J 44 V) ,-i C-6 W \V MW (Q V 4 2 D 0 D N n E 0 a d nN1 G n X N N d C e 3 0 c 0 ay E .2 m 4 0 d Dc m o ma t [� �H D Q L.W. O j O y� C_ E Er 8W �D n� Q n 0 a` F c 'o U 0 U N L d N n n Q m n 0 a` F c 0 U U a N N O� W va W N 0 0 N N w 0 r, OA a ME wl 4-.l U) }J 1"1 :., m Ili V C N ,O V 7 y y a Q m a m n E o N N x¢ N d C N N 3 O CC O A E C N a c m m N F O 0 ao n� E� c ER Et N A 0 n� a¢ r n 0 a` c 0 U _`m 0 U m r v v FO a n Q 0 a` D 0 0 U N 0 U 0 tV a O �\ Q V W W 0 0 N ti lY Q N Q N O_ O O Y y rl N w O a N L O V/ oZ$ U) 4� A i_% r-i C N M� W C 4 FA a O n m m a v a E o a v N N n W W C N N a O 0 O D i C Q d G N 80 R P E EL v v ao 'o n� Oy N� r C L 8m mm -a Qs a° z v Q a c 'o V _v 0 U v L_ y m n n Q v n 0 a` A 0 U m 0 U N I tV 4 � J 0 f Q V W W O O N Fi' ASOY � I zNM �a O o pma � W J I-Jn, S yi � { = A A A i A A • -< - _ x- � rc x A - ® 4 A '3 1 w WP 6 s ! 0 a a x • s t t e P e a ; a a a _ s � a `� p 6 6£ 3 »�� = -R __- _i -e- z''•� a �.a � � � A ¢ - � b • 3' onus ws _ _ G P F A a a tl a • s : A €` c .� R � a A 'A YM R E A._ • SO C Y 4 A _ -0 - __ c a _ S S e/ a k a 6 3 �3ws arx a a - ------------ E a' m Z R 2i xTxi N - a W R i R A 6 A R _ - FS 1331LLS s a 4 � w F � J � �' ii �aa_PPGA•A R A A w Q Q .SAAAP E A O o Z Z I � a xs u3xu xu �m m " r14Y6gy � aw.m 943$733 LAND USE: A.3. Summary Table of Land Use & Zoning (within 500 feet) LAND USE APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PERCENTAGE Residential (Estates) 34.2 52 Vacant Residential 23.4 35 Commercial 0.17' 0 Undeveloped Commercial 3.75 6 ROW — Road 4.62 7 TOTAL 66.14 100% ZONING APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PERCENTAGE E — Estates 62.22 94 C -2 0.17 0 Commercial PUD 3.75 6 IfoyY� 66.14 100% Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 05 -26 -05 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT E FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map # 9 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map #10 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 w F IM F SECTION V.B: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION W (y Q F 6 IN F b 'I E �y V, MANION ix Nl MAP 2 W G 1 MI. p MI. M�M Bf. X!3 MO TEMl LPPO, 4,CTw CdIMNtt OEhlq'Np! ,1Np prylRgyMdTFL YAVN£9 gM9XIN qc IALll- R0>3 -I.00L GAR S /3JS R 26E R27E 0 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP l uFf':f!ITj . {FTC I R 28E LEGEND ® I-- NNMEROAL ❑ 9EL11DIENT 4iG ■ AGTNTY ¢NICK ❑ ��' GATE ', EGTAIE% ■ WLfN GAIL PANNWAY ® A GIFHIAY .NI 5Mg41NICT BINTAGMGA9A GGWI1bM14311d NNMCILL 9JCGI31111C! WIIL![ACML WWISNGCT ❑ NI®N! RF90FIITAL MW BPIIEVNm caaLentlu weoWnan .RANwu NoiRevANO � xnwegmom CgI1kAtlA1 WPd912GT CdTEg PINE RCN£ RG[gAO MIKD YS 9131WC/ • EVAM AEmodnAL ® IN•FlIL 91®15" �` MNatt 9MA INhAgIMWE ACTHT/ MI ER ® AS OE m IN MNW MIX WIFA➢Id94E PLAN. Ng1E: MIS NAP CWIp! GE MIEITSEI I. WMWIT ME 0/ q 4PFCIIIR fV1g6 NYI INU YZ OE9tlLt1lN [fSplPnw a. XN 6 iNC 6ggEN GlE MEA NATIFR PIAN W (y Q F 6 IN F b 'I E �y V, MANION ix Nl MAP 2 W G 1 MI. p MI. M�M Bf. X!3 MO TEMl LPPO, 4,CTw CdIMNtt OEhlq'Np! ,1Np prylRgyMdTFL YAVN£9 gM9XIN qc IALll- R0>3 -I.00L GAR S /3JS R 26E R27E 0 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP l uFf':f!ITj . {FTC I R 28E SECTION V.E: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION MAP 9 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Collier County. Florida EAMENDED PTEMBER 10, 2003 N. 2003 -44 CTOBER 26, 2004 2004 -71 PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENMRONMENTAL SERVICES DIMSIGN FILE: GGMP- 47.DNG DATE: 11/2004 WIDEN GAZE ESTATES NHGI9QRH0M CENTEn LEGEND NBCHeoRHOOG � CENTERS 0 1 MI 2 MI MAP 10 WILSON BOULEVARD /GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD CENTER Collier County, Florida IMMOELALEE bUBJECT PROPERTY 6.92f ACRES ADOPTED - SEPTEMBER f0, 2003 Ord. No. 2003 -44 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. PREPARED BW. GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COAMUMTY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERNCPS DIVISION FILE: GOAP- 43.DWG DATE 9/2003 SECTION V.E: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION LEGEND GOLDEN GATE SETTLEMENT 19 ESTATES AREA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SECTION V.E: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT F ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental FLUCCS Map Historic and /or Archeological Sites Survey of Endangered /Threatened Wildlife and Plant Species — June 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 Ww .' "&� IN Lkq I AMr� 77 js ti q Ilk ;f 05/19/2005 21:28 9412636616 COLLIER ENVIRON CONS Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 3880 Estey Ave. Naples, Hondo 311 4 Date: o:;o Attention: Buyer(s): Property Legal Soils Present Yes( Hydrology: o (x) PAGE 01 Telephone (239) 2632687 Fax (239) 2636616 Indicators: --i>nt A e% C_� o.�� 2%>J.�"n !� v�[�� ✓� 5 �� %s... i,.��. Vegetation Present: -T1 o,3 L- - �! n"e Se -A-Tr e- e? 3 ,� A n... Wetland egeta on Present: Yes 6C No( ) ja���r,a — "I Upland Vegetation Present: Yes (�,) No( ) �� y 0 c Comments : Jurisdictional Wetlands Present' : Yes ( ) No Comments: YV This is an opinion, Jurisdiction can only be asserted by a State and/or Federal Agency Should An Environmental Resource Permit Be Required From The Department of Environmental Protection and US Army Corp of Engineers ? Yes ( ) No (>I. Was The Property Surveyed 7 Yes ( ) No (>Q' ' if the property was not surveyed, the property boundaries were estimated. The actual property site boundaries may vary. ' If the site contains Jurisdictional Wetlands, an Environmental Resource Permit will be required prior to construction. In order to qualify for an exemption for the construction of a single family house, DEP will allow 6,000 square feet of clearing and 4,000 square feet of fill, in isolated wetlands. These impacts include the driveway, septic and house pad Any impacts beyond this threshold may require mitigation. Mitigation may of exotic removal and/or donation of funds. The actual cost for mitigation will vary with e wetlands d the amount of impacts proposed. The USACOE's Nationwide permit will , 10 0/0 Date SECTION V.C.3: COLLIER COUNTY'S HISTORICAL / ARCHAEOLOGICAL NPROBABILITY MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY..,.. I... - _.acm ,wr W+smewl�weaaaea rxee snr 666A9 OW t1SELLS t1 EADE NEE QUADIGNGPROBenitm t► �ecw xnowe mNC�uz piW m aeap • .num winvrunge.� mrt dm m srxq O F USGS BELLE MEADE NE: DATA SHEET General Description: This quadrangle is situated in the Flatwoods Zone in the central portion of Collier County. The land can be described as predominantly freshwater marshland with occasional areas of pine flatwoods. Curry Island and Big Corkscrew Island lie in the extreme northern portion of the quadrangle. SR 84 (Everglades Parkway /Alligator Alley) runs east -west through the southern half of the map area The southeastern corner of the quadrangle is contained within the Golden Gate State Forest. The eastern and northern thirds of the quadrangle are part of the Golden Gate Estates development with Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard serving as the main avenues. These areas have been ditched and drained and access roads built in a grid pattern It should be noted that a majority ofthis quadrangle is not divided into Sections within Township 49 South, Range 27 and 28 East. Thus, locational data, particularly soil type distribution, is not easy to evaluate. Previous Work: Several professional historicaVarchaeological survey have been undertaken within this quadrangle. One was performed for the Ford 'Vehicle Evaluation Facility (#4414 - ACI 1995), and no sites were discovered. In addition, the 1991 AHC survey targeted and investigated selected locales within this quadrangle and recorded one site (8CR729). In 1994, Weisman and Newman (#4013) conducted a. reconnaissance of-the Golden Gate State Forest, but recorded no sites. The other recorded sites within this quadrangle were reported by John Beriault and other local archaeologists (FSF), Previously Recorded/Reported Sites: There are seven reported archaeological sites within this quadrangle. They are all black dirt middens; however, 8CR741 may have also been a Seminole campsite. The location of each site is depicted on the Probability Maps. Discussion/Recommendations: In general, much of the area is a broad, level expanse of wetlands. Potential site locations (probability zones) identified by the predictive model are shaded. These conform to the margins of Curry Island ( Beriault, personal communication) or slightly elevated areas of hammock or pine vegetation with rapid internal drainage. All shaded areas on the Probability Map are recommended for professional archaeological survey. In addition, all previously recorded archaeological sites should be relocated and assessed as per their condition and significance. USGS BELLE MEADE NE: SITE INVENTORY SHEET Site No. Site Name T S Comments CR00183 Conch A CR00184 Deer Leg A CRA0185 Lily A CR00693 Trema A CR00729 Lone Fallen Oak A CR00741 Garden Grove A,1 CR00780 Kyle A •�°bo vas°' FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Kelly Foote Planning Development Incorporated 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 Naples, Florida 34103 April 13, 2005 RE: DHR Project File Number: 2005 -3362 Received by DHR April 13 22, 2005 Amendment to Collier County Growth Management Plan Proposed 4.58 -Acre Commercial Development at the Southeast Comer of Golden Gate Boulevard and In Street Southwest Collier County Dear Mr. Foote: In accordance with the procedures contained in the Collier County Growth Management Plan, we reviewed the referenced project for possible impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, archaeological, or architectural value. We have reviewed the Florida Master Site File and our records and no cultural resources are known to exist in the area of potential effect. Therefore, based on the information provided, it is the opinion of the office that no cultural resources will be affected by this undertaking. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Scott Edwards, Historic Preservationist, by electronic mail sedwards ®dos.statefl.us, or at 850- 245 -6333 or 800- 847 -7278. Sincerely, Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and vvv State Historic Preservation Officer 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 . http: / /Www.tlheritage.com Cl Director's Office O Archaeological Research H Historic Preservation i0) 245 -6300 - FAX: 245-W6 (850) 245 -6444 • FAX: 245 -6436 (850) 245 -63ic • FAX; Lion 37 (85 O Historical Museums 0) 245 -6400 • FAX: 2455433 Southeast Regional Office ❑ Northeast Regional Office O Central Florida Regional Office (954) 467 -4990 • FAX: 467 -4991 (904) 8255045 • FAX: 8255044 (813) 272 -3843 • FAX: 272 -2340 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES June 1, 2005 Ms. Kelly Foote Planning Development Incorporated 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 Naples, Florida 34103 Re: Cultural Resource Assessment Request Proposed Amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan 2.34 Acres in Section 9, T49S -R27E, Collier County DHR Project File No. 2005 -5191 Dear Ms. Foote: According to this agency's responsibilities under Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, and any appropriate local ordinances, we reviewed the proposed potential comprehensive plan amendment. A review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or considered likely to be present within the amendment area. Furthermore, because of the project location and/or nature, it is considered unlikely that historic properties will be affected. Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment will have no effect on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical or archaeological value. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hesitate to contact Susan Harp at (850) 245 -6333. Thank you for your interest in protecting Florida's historic resources. Sincerely, Frederick Gaske, Director 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 . http: / /www.flheritage.com Director's Office O Archaeological Research ✓ Historic Preservation O Historical Museums (85u) 145 -6300 • FAX: 245 -6436 (850) 245 -6444 • FAX: 245 -6436 (850) 245 -6333 • FAX: 245 -6437 (850) 245 -6400 • FAX: 245 -6433 O Southeast Regional Office ❑ Northeast Regional Office O Central Florida Regional Office (954) 467 -4990 • FAX: 46711991 (904) 825 -5045 • FAX: 825 -5044 (813) 272 -3843 • FAX: 272 -2340 F END SURVEY WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Future Land Use Element) Petition # CP- 2005 -2 Estates Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Subdistrict Expansion Southwest comer of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Collier County, Naples, Florida Prepared For: PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED Development Consahanb, Engineers, Plontrers and L n bcape Architects Certificate ofAulhorizahon Number: 8450 5133 Gstello Drive, Suite 2, Napks, Florida, 34103 239 / 263 -6934 • 239 / 263 -6981 fax PDI MRF Q AOL.COM Prepared By: COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Contact Mr. Marco Espinar 3880 Esrey Avenue, Naples, Florida, 34104 239/263-2687 • 239 / 263 -6616 fax June 2006 I Introduction / Purpose This report is an account of an Endangered / Threatened wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on a 6.92 f acre tract called Estates Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict expansion near the SW Corner of Wilson Blvd. and Golden Gate Blvd. CP- 2005 -02. Required to meet county review requirements its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report are based on fieldwork performed during June 2006. H Site Description CP- 2005 -02 consists of approximately 6.92 acres and is located in Section 09, Township 49, Range 27. This is an L- shaped parcel located near a very busy intersection. The property has 330' of frontage on Golden Gate Blvd. to the North, 680' of frontage along 1 Street SW to the west, and 150' of frontage on Wilson Blvd. to the east. See Item # 1 - Location Map The dominant forest type on this project site consists of a Slash pine, cypress canopy with a midstory of cabbage palms, myrsine and wax myrtle. The site has been affected by an altered hydrological regime. This habitat offers some limited diversity for some small vertebrates. In total the site consists of approximately 6.92 acres. The following is how the acreage figures breakdown. 6.92 acres Pine, Cypress, Cabbage palm 624 D See Item #2 - FLUCCS Map III Threatened and Endangered Species Survev The required survey for a Threatened and Endangered Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in June 2006. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were ground - located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (I 100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 - 1800) time periods were chosen to survey these transects. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. Concurrently, notes for FLUCCS mapping purposes were kept. IV Results & Discussions Listed Flora Several species of plants that are listed by government agencies were found on this property during the trained surveys. None found are considered rare. A few Stiff - leaved Tillandsias were found. Which is listed by the State of Florida primarily due to commercial value. See Item # 3 - FLUCCS Plant List Listed Fauna See Item # 4 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion Big Cypress Fox Squirrels Big Cypress Fox Squirrels are known to use similar habitat found onsite. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed during this study. ' Conclusions Focused searches were conducted over five days. Transects were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 10 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transects were primarily meandering transects through areas of prime habitat. All transects were walked at varying times from post -dawn & mid -day to pre - sunset hours. This parcel is bordered by two paved roads and near by single family homes. The road to the north is Golden Gate Blvd. and to the east is Wilson Blvd. The nearby corner is a high traffic area. The heavy traffic patterns were almost at all times. At times high traffic noise limited hearing. The pine, cypress, cabbage palm areas still have enough recognizable character to support some foraging by common small mammals and birds. Signs of small mammals such as raccoons were readily visible. Several species of song birds passed through transect areas during this survey. Our survey has found no listed vertebrate species on this site. A few Tillandsia's were found. Threatened. Endan¢ered and Species of Special Concern Species Black bear Florida panther Everglades mink Big Cypress Fox squirrel Indigo snake American alligator Gopher tortoise Gopher Frog Present Absent x x x x x x x x Southeastern American kestrel x Red - Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x w E O 5 _ f i 1 I r I r •- f HLf i t.l '! . �-T-.' i- 1 t- - _ T� r t i 'i .i� 1 t •, r� t r r �i - i 1 1 r F .i r �" ,t � - ' - 1 1 I 1 t } t 1 1 U W � _ u 5 90 Gidi 6b L I 5 05 1 C c N �q m ?de LCO p Ai LU 5 25 1 G I V% LOCATION M" Tl 71 lmklrl m vim= Ar low Cal ads s \� Mau lam RMS mosis :! H _i _ a i ss a za a x= 6. i a .:. �a °n XF A 'X 8 XX FR F 8 a ax SF F XF Sa R6 RRXR xA % Y 6:- a 'Y -+ a R 8 c S a Y S E S A G A A R x R R 4a:. a ! 18 2a 2A V L A8 x Ax - s..A 9S SS 4 4s SS sg as - R RR AG as xR cA S to g, a :a 2 6 n !a Ya S9 l::a ! i a s a 8 A. a 2 a! 6 E! Y 12A 9 X X A X X a 8 s L Iv a a a 9 2 a E a a: F« nR - a SS Rc an S';A E 6 a L Y :! a S 2 a 6 a 8 X 9 : a x E 6 a: R S X F S F IAC R s< I E R a 2 a a F a s Re 9^ 8 S S 8i SS ra3a a s 81/:1814.1 rYRR Sa A gas 2'. a S 1S 34399 r ^S 4 4 R R RR a:. A as RR S a +R SR GR 'A „ x S a« y a A G t S 93 6 9 a 3 R R A x a« S 8 G S S 5 R s A R X A R R R A S _ a. Aw- ?.t an A a _ a S 41 R X W A R L4 A s 4 S 4 3 4 Y _� S S S x A ^axRS R -aa4- E 8;'AA « -- c CS 88_- ^e8a- a __ i s8 $ 1, sBall a Sa 570 5 93 ! E 88 a xaa 3' Y S L! f 2 29 s2 R R A a "82 S L S - 22 Ya, i a a a' A AX R<..Y a 8 62 22 :98 A AAA 8$:888 8 R RARX X F AF a 86 SL' 99 F'i SELL! ^.a a..9 X x $s :2 A s 231:31349 r S R! as 82 2 2F ?aa a - 1 S ^. Y 1 44 SS 41 r:�Ya 9. 111 9 413 TV SRR A a AA R a A RR R a i4 A X% AR R a RR � ! Ex 1 ASXa r 31 - I A I SA I 01 R RR X a a.. c 0 _ ak? 1- . B 1 4 1 - -o 6 m a - z a A AaC S A x RAW R A R 4 r 9 `2 a R R R E R SS Y 1 4 c Ths aaxS ^ ___ __ -_o -'8 _SB - «a ASE S__ - - -'34 ss2eass :2 :2 2s � sseaaasaE_ a:2IIxss6 axis C t -R SL S ! as 2 :S R 6y a8i 2 3N Y.9 M LS 13E 4 6a. F - 6ES8sa 3 as a 4 63 a V r S S R a in 0 :844: 1471 ^ +SW as SS:SS YS IV :SAS 6 Ra AIR a 9 -R R^ t4 S X S E an a N A R R E A M LS 11 R Q4Z - a a% R ill! R A a« S G W A R Z x a R% R i - R R a ` A - R x __ _. B _ _ _ _ _ _ _r SAe ' - A 0 •$ R R R R x R R F AAA R _ «_ A 9 6 S S R x A R X R R� +� A A x R x R R R R S_ S 11 G 11 A R R? R A R - - S _ r_ - R_ « a N .'_. R r _ 1 L - _ - _ a x_ R 1_ _ _ _ _ _ 4 . Y S_ a 6 8,; ^+ c _ _ _ _ _ _ A _ - x _ as a 2 ai :6 Li8s28 888_ sY Slaaxs L8sg8Ea':' _ L! . CIN Sit S it s as 56 ! a i2 ea 9a s S YL II.i9 x a S F FA X RF p a E2^ s9 'I AR FXR F cR�: a 7a� 6 A XA FRS $. R: R- - a;9 s LS A. a RR Y. a^ Yai S S. 6aeRF s a.sa R A$Ii..B a < a< < a - 2 - 2a< a Sao s: aR s8 SERaeg1 474 SrSR R 945: 44 Y S SS S A a A A < :R o -.8 94' -YS S90 16- a S �.Y...S aR RR Ra ASR xaa A a ;RSaa XR eRx Aa «ASAA SR qRa %j- FR R^ s -. -i' a G SA 'Rx- �9- A sR n _ _ 'MN SHL •99 MS 5 L eeee4_ tY ClL8c8:.a i �42 Eat d F2 2 ¢: a: SSS S 11 f k zn u_ _ ¢ R__ <0 9 : h- S AA`. AAA SR RAAR X_ A'n SAGS A =a R'gR A A' 5 A a 'i _SSgsasa 6 S S _c4--- 49- _a__saa Mask 6 a 8 M s8 R S 6 S 3 S RR s L_ XY. i 2: A F>;8 e ISIS 2 $ R x2 Y a a 8 $1 A S a a M X 5 a a Sass 3 - 988 Y t nA : - A =R 8 8 y 9' a _N if a`!!aa 6 s ° ei s 23 26 2 M S SY 4 £ r1 R% S 3 49 S * R R A(11 R^ � x A S G A 6 A i A a« R A A R A a X' MN _ a Y S S n .. _ _ _ _ _ M _ e s - 5 S n 3 2 x A« A A c _ S R x A a «_SAG S L; 8 P p Y L a'.2 4858- s63is _a S S 8aAo aSa pY 2214191912 ES 68 8a 2 9 a a s a 8S! a a :. 5M8 8✓ R a 888 s 22 MN 5 6 II F A'MS 6 X:86 R S$: S 6 S a s 3_y S R X s ARV VA Ad F I FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 624 D Slash pine, Cypress, Cabbage palm Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,D Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,O palmetto Serona repens FACU G,C Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,O Dahoon holly flex cassine OBL M,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,O Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O gallberry Ilex glabra FACW M,O wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ M,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Blue Maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum FACW G,C beak rush Rhynchospora microcarpa FACW+ G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.O Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C wire grass Aristida stricta FAC- G,O Stiff - leaved Tillandsia fasiculata FDA/C ABREVLITIONS — Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Species Amphibian & Reptiles: Six- lined racerunner Cnemidouhorus sexlineatus Brown anole Anolis sagrei Black racer Columber constrictor Birds Dove - ground Columbina passerina Dove- mourning Zenaida macroura mockingbird Mimus uolvglottos Vulture, turkey Cathartes aura Vultue, Black Coragyps atratus Pileated woodpecker Drvocopus pileatus Northern flicker Colantes auratus Flycatcher, great crested Myiarchus crinitus Crow, american Corvus brachvrhynchos Common grackle 4uiscalus quiscula Bluejay Cyanocitta cristata Carolina wren Thrvothorus ludovicianus Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mimus Polv lg ottos Cardinal Richmondena cardinalis Mammals: Virginia opossum Didelnhis vir ig niana Racoon Procyon lotor Hispid cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus Nine -banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctu Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Status ® 200k COWW COUW PropedY Appraiser. While OW Courier COWIY Props y Appraiser is dommgfed to pmvWing the most accareta and up- to-date i ftMMUon, nc W ft data herOla, ila use, or ha lnterprOtedon. http: // maps. collierappraiserc om/ webmap/ mapprintaspx ?Citle= &orienrLANDSCAPE&pa... 6/15/2006 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT G GROWTH MANAGEMENT Density and /or Intensity to Land Uses Narrative — June 6, 2006 — Supplemental Response Information GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 GROWTH MANAGEMENT: D. 5. Density and /or Intensity to Land Uses Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district /subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district /subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) FA.C.). If so, provide date and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, EA. C.). RESPONSE: The acreage of the subject property is 6.92 t acres and it is currently designated as Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. We are proposing an amendment in the Growth Management Plan to designate the subject property within the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict. Suitability of Land for the Proposed Use: Through the development standards, proposed setbacks and the development standards of the LDC, the property will be suitable for the proposed use. Compatibility of Use with Surroundinlz Land Uses: Development standards for the subdistrict have previously been found to provide for compatibility with surrounding land uses. As this proposed amendment is an expansion of the commercial, these standards will remain applicable. Achieving compatibility has been made easier by the proposed expansion which reduces the length of common property line with residential. Additionally, the proposed expansion will increase the overall commercial yield of the Center by providing for greater efficiency of land use due to the increase of commercial land use to parcel area. The efficiency of land use is most desirable. Currently the surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Right -of -Way (Golden Gate Boulevard) and vacant single - family residential but designated within the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center. South: Residential (one single parcel with access from Wilson Blvd. to I" St SW) Page] of 3 Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 05 -26 -05 East: Right -of -Way (Wilson Boulevard) and vacant single - family residential but designated within the Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center. This parcel has recently been sold for commercial values, suggesting that rezone to commercial is eminent and West: Right -of -Way (I" St SW) The subject property is adjacent to property already in the Golden Gate Master Plan designated as a Neighborhood Center. The total acreage for this Neighborhood Center currently is 23.32 f acres. We are proposing to add another 6.92 acres, totaling 30.24 t acres. We have established a trade area of a 2 mile radius, which contains a 2.68 acre commercial site, a 5.0 acre proposed (application for rezone has been submitted) commercial site and 15.64 acres of potential (GMP) commercial property. When considering commercial yield, right -of -way easements and buffer requirements of commercial lands within Golden Gate Estates, we estimate the actual developable acreage for commercial development is 75% of comparable yield of urban commercial lands; or stated another way, it takes 1.33 acres (1 divided by 75 %) of commercial lands in the Estates to yield one acre. of urban commercial lands. The need for commercial to service the growing population of the Estate has been well established. Specific to this request, the proposed commercial of this Center is to be neighborhood oriented. Collier County has previously and conservatively established ratios of amenity / convenience neighborhood commercial ratio for commercial components within Planned Unit Developments. We utilized this accepted standard to conservatively establish need requirements of the local community / service area. Commercial Source Rural Comparison Acreage Urban Ac.(75 %) f t Existing Neighborhood Center Commercial: 2.7 2.0 Additional Zoned Neighborhood Center Commercial: 5.0 3.8 Potential GMP Neighborhood Center Commercial: 15.6 11.7 Expansion of Neighborhood Center Commercial 6.9 5.2 Total 30.2 22.7 Utilizing the current standard per LDC Section 4.07.04 for Neighborhood Commercial Centers, the maximum size of a commercial component in a Mixed Use Planned Development is 15.00 acres, which allows for 2,001/+ units. If we added another 8 acres to this, the total number of dwelling units would be 3,152 through 3,301. Within the trade area there are 8,038 + acres (already reduced for 1,024 acres of non Estate lands which may or may not add to serve residential population), and subtracting the acreage allowed for existing or potential commercial development, the acreage is approximately Page 2 of 3 Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 05 -26 -05 8,010 f acres. This acreage could potentially house approximately 3,560 units at 1 unit per 2.25 acres. Using this criterion, the trade area could support approximately 26 acres of neighborhood center commercial property. It currently has the potential for 17.5 acres, leaving approximately an 8.5 acre shortage. It therefore can be concluded that with the expansion of the Center, yielding 23 acres of equivalent urban commercial acreage, that the identified shortage shall be reduced to 3 acres. It should be further emphasized that this is neighborhood commercial and due to the limited parcel acreages, parcel geometries and restrictive development standards relative to setbacks, buffer and similar and associated provisions, intermediate and general commercial needs are not being addressed or satisfied by these neighborhood centers. Protection of Environmentally Sensitive Land: The property does not contain wetlands or other standards which would identify the subject property as environmentally sensitive. The subject property is subject to GMP and LDC development standards for open space and buffer requirement which include standards for retained existing vegetation and installation of native vegetation. Protection of Ground Water and Natural Resources: The subject property is within an identified wellfield and shall be subject to the LDC development standards which provide for protection of this resource. Page 3 of 3 Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard i Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 05 -26 -05 June 6, 2006 Supplemental Response Information Exhibit G. Growth Management a. The Urban Land Institute establishes a trade area for a Neighborhood Center with a 1.5 mile radius and not a 2 mile radius as indicated; Response: It was and is not our understanding that the County requires adherence to UM guidelines. The trade area utilized is in response to a population relationship established by the referenced LDC standard relative to the density of the Estates. Additionally, previously and presently accepted exhibits to Staff have utilized similar or non ULI guidelines including the accepter] submittal by our firm for the NW corner of Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevards, which exhibit was undertaken by Fishkind and Associates. This more comprehensive document further supports the need of the proposed neighborhood expansion. b. Population, both existing and at full build out in the trade area, is not shown nor is there reference to seasonal population; Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. c. Number of dwelling units, both existing and at full build out in the trade area is not shown; Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. d. Household income, both existing and at full build out, in the trade area is not shown; Response. The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. e. Total trade area income, both existing and at full build out is not shown; Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. I'nce' ul'4 1 t'::a:. �I�Unn•. Cuii �q,lr >. I'IorIn.: ;alai Inrinat:'. Ilc�rbyyn, q�('ou <ullunl3 nuJ l'I:umrc' I;md.iap.:Ard:BOrlr 3y_'ryiLJCI iAutl ni tliup'v'�j0 Ilm;iil. I ilnrFo ;n •I v:�ni I is e:- - Lt- bilru =. -� f. Retail expenditures, both existing and at full build out, is not shown; Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. g. Supportable square feet of retail and service space based on retail expenditures is not shown; Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. h. Determination of land use requirement is not shown based upon the above methodology. Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. i. Determination of supply of existing commercial land uses within the trade area is not shown; and Response: The application support documents do specifically address commercial availability within the immediate vicinity. j. Comparison of supply of existing commercial land uses to the demand has not been shown. Response: The referenced LDC standard which is supportive of the proposal is not linked to these items and therefore is not applicable. General Additional Response. Neighborhood Commercial is in some respects a poor classification of the commercial use of such commercially designated areas. End users such as drug stores, gas stations, banks etc, rely on a greater population than their immediate neighborhood and are more appropriately designated as Convenience Commercial, providing needed services to both the immediate neighborhood and to pass -by traffic. Such convenience commercial, when well and appropriately dispersed, significantly reduce trip length for common /frequently used goods and services. As further consideration of this application, we have attached the most current traffic counts for the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard Please note that the 2006 first quarter 24 hour volume was 28,418 trips, which is greater than the intersection of US 41 and CR 951 (Collier Blvd) and many other major intersections throughout the County, which do support significant square footage of commercial at their intersections. �n lelli l _Il''i :,14!01 neu�i� I)tir n,m nU n. "�:anis and Plocnar< !; _ �1._.I -:� t�l ;.i,gvl 1ulh ni ium' -6'7tii InrC' ulini,f.�:�� .nm lunq:"S ATTACHED: SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSPORTATON SUPPORT DOCUMENTS W F Q Iw a 0 SENSE NMI Iw a 0 w a 0 w a 0 NNIII Milill w a 0 CoIBeeCounry Tnnspo" dm Seevicn Division 2885 S. Hm hm Drive, Napks, FL 30104 FMm (239) 774 -8260 Fu (239) 213 -5868 TiIN ��16 Corr County 2005 AVERAGE _4'-�;DAILY=�TRAFF I C Robe" W. Tiplm, Diseclm Tnfr;c Openlims Pnpaeed by: Nary Frye Fngi.cring TaMieim mncyfryci@eollierg -.w Mareb, 2005 Introduction In April 1989, Collier County Transportation Department took over all traffic counting activities on State roads (except for 1 -75) and County roads in unincorporated coastal Collier County. This year (2005), the County contract providing traffic counts to the City of Marco Island was terminated eliminating approximately 30 count stations. The County now maintains 161 stations at which single 24 -hour counts are taken. Of the 161 stations, the counts are taken quarterly at 134 stations; semi - annually at 7 stations; and, annually at 20 stations. These counts are taken to measure seasonal variations and to identify growth patterns. Approximately 250 special counts are taken from time to time at other locations in response to the need for additional data. The traffic engineering studies, listed in this tabulation, are an average of all counts taken at each station during the calendar year indicated and represent an estimate of the average weekday traffic for each location. A column has been included to give the percentage of change from the prior year, as either an increase or decrease in traffic volume presented at each location. Traffic count stations showed an average increase of 5.08% in the total number of vehicles counted at stations where a normal year's worth of data was collected. At Station 682, Oakes Blvd., the greatest decrease is noted at - 18.30%; and at Station 638, Desoto Blvd, the greatest increase is noted at 42.21 %. On the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Count Report and the Quarterly Count Report; the stations are listed alphabetically. Maps are included for the Naples, Immokalee, Copeland and Everglades City areas showing the approximate location of the count stations and indicating the station number. The Quarterly Count Report lists the 2004 and 2005 quarters indicating the Peak (I st Quarter) to ADT percent change for 2005. It should be noted that peak season (1 st Quarter) traffic increases over ADT an average of 40.95% on Collier County - Unless otherwise indicated, all stations are located within 500 to 1,000 feet of the referenced intersection. All entries are 24 -hour, two-way totals which are then averaged to give the Average Daily Traffic; the numbers stated are considered to be raw data. Note: A column was added this year to indicate anomalies due to construction (C) and hurricanes (H) for appropriate count stations. If more information is required, please call for more information on individual quarters that may be available. Should more detailed information be needed, please call Traffic Operations at (239) 774 -8260. Page 2 of 14 March, 2005 Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 20061 615 1A 129 SR north of US 41 SR 80 amlarm Trail E. 3,0251 3,0721 3,198 J,JJJ 2,591 2,620 <.00 N 1.12% 582 IA 129 (SRI south of US 41 SR 90 4,1161 3.9401 3,679 3,419 3,177 -7.08% 661 JA 182 (SRI west of SR 29 9,632 11,624 11,144 11,225 11,531 2.73% 619 Q 846 Devi's Garden Rd east of SR 29 3,502 4,242 3,317 3,269 2,853 - 12.72% 553 H p AI Rd CR 31 north of Davis Blvd SR 47,224 45,883 47,870 50,029 0 501 C Q Rd CR 31 north of Golden Gate P (CR ass) 50,825 50,748 43,472 42,784 - 0 693 Q Air rt Rd CR 31 north of North Road 52,148 55 416 53,860 54 560 1.30% 599 Q Rd (CR 31 north of Orange Blosso48,731 45,664 48,896 46,144 39,444 - 14.52% 503 4 Q AI rt Rd CR 31 north of Pine Rid a Rd N96466 46 610 44,288 49,634 46,179 0 543'1 Q A Rd CR 31 north of US 41 SR 45 ay 27,978 27,572 27,911 29,607 0 659 Q Ai rt Rd CR 31 north of Vanderbilt BeaR eat 36 183 34,986 35 742 36 331 31,0 - 14.43% 552 Q Rd CR 31 south of Davis Blvd (SR 37,914 36,031 37,000 37,895 36,943 -2.51% 533 C Q Ai Rd CR 31 south of Golden Gate P Bea 58,426 55 412 50 809 53,637 0 554 H O Rd CR 31 south of Immokalee Rd 32,5811 31,899 32,518 33,601 0 502 H Q Airport Rd (CR st south of Pine Ridge Rd 51 31 49 877 46331 46,970 0 521 Q Ba Itore Dr north of Week Ave 16,626 16,352 15,377 14,636 14,271 -2.49% 626 A Cam Keats Rd south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 2,240 3,089 3,267 3 027 3,854 27.32% 660 A Capri Blvd west of Collier Blvd (SR 951 4,652 5,1351 4,276 4,780 11.79% 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 - 5,688 5,656 5,703 5,927 5,472 -7.68% 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 2,354 2,173 2,209 2,172 2,075 -4.47% 573 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Davis Blvd sR 84 45,100 45,475 46,582 53,866 56,180 4.30% 584 H Q Collier Blvd CR 9st north of Golden Gate Blvd 16,827 18,042 18,536 18,518 0 525 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Golden Gate P CR 986 25,945 26,518 27,409 29,570 31,943 8.03% 5361 10 lColller Blvd CR 951 north of Pine Rid a Rd CR e96 28,007 31,031 33,549 35,421 37,304 5.32% 6 12 Q Collier Blvd cR sst north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd cR es4 29,939 30,288 31,626 33,926 38,709 14.10% 532 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of US 41 SR 90 Tamiaml TraB 21,077 22,828 23,920 21,918 23,061 522% 607 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south -"-"-n Gate P CR 886 28,115 22,415 23,232 25,815 29,160 12.96% 655 Q Collier Blvd CR ast south of Immokalee Rd crt e46 14,149 19,725 19,464 21,796 21,792 -0 657 Q Collier Blvd cR sst south of Le Cultural Blvd 25,349 25,016 26,284 29,365 32,477 10.60% 603 Q Collier Blvd cR 951 south of Ratlesnake Ham Rd ca esa 26,5831 27,713 27,928 31,462 34,013 8.11% 557 H Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south of US 41 SR 90 Tamiamt Trail) 33,4221 34,288 34,132 351556 0 627 Q Collier Blvd SR 9511 south of Coon Blvd CR 952 25.3991 26,386 26,1781 27,814 28,598 2.82% 520 Q County Bern Rd mnh of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864 I (County Faciliy Fad Road Maimenanw fi moved ta Davis OW. 10,968 11,266 11,354 11,474 9,679 - 15.64% 641 A Coun Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 17,106 14,954 15,005 0 13,777 519 Q Court Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd SR 84 13,775 13,863 14,124 13,837 13,256 -420% 559 Q Davis Blvd SR se east of Airport Rd cR 31 30,590 31,084 30,183 30,798 32,083 4.17% 558 Q Davis Blvd sR ed west of Ai rt Rd CR at 33,665 33,104 32,686 33,942 36,444 7.37% 601 C Q Davis Blvd SR 84 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 22,8301 22,726 22,920 25,969 0 - 560 Q Davis Blvd sR e4 west of Radio Rd CR 856 13,747 14,122 14,200 14,965 16,475 10.09% 538 Q Davis Blvd sR e4 west of Santa Barbara Blvd 31,917 31,000130.7891 32,561 34,781 6.82% 638 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 846 1,1801 1,365 1,585 2,254 42.21% 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd CR 676 1,854 1,1391 1,522 2,039 2,324 13.98% 636 S Ever lades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 3,576 4,4481 5,817 6,520 8,108 24.36 °� 635 S Ever lades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd caese 2,585 3,105 3,974 5,328 6,497 21.83 °k 637 S Ever lades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 3,649 4,2941 4,946 5,672 5,878 3.63% 549 Q First St south CR 846 south of Main St SR 2s 11,943 12,855 12,945 12,866 13,782 7.12% 531 H Q Golden Gate Blvd CR e.s I east of Collier Blvd CR 951 20,156 20,307 25,368 27,606 p 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 87s east of Wilson Blvd 121,175 12,474 15,801 17,790 19,665 14.40 °,6 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd cR 87s west of Wilson Blvd 14,566 16,805 20,667 23,255 27,340 77.57 °h 508 C 0 Golden Gate Pk (CR RRAI east of Air ort Rd CR 31 30,027 30,335 28,877 29,836 0 691 C/H Q Golden Gate Pk CR 686 east of Livin ston Road (CR eat 31,140 28,860 0 0 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy ICR Aml east of Santa Barbara Blvd 29,870 30,785 31,042 29,124 29,669 1.87% 507 0 Golden Gate Pk ICR 886 ) west of Airport Rd CR 31 45,172 44,268 44,592 45,594 44,751 - 7.85% 510 Q Golden Gate Pk (CR 886 west of Collier Blvd (CR 951 18,377 18,467 18,640 19,145 20,501 7.09 °� 530 Q Golden Gate Pk (CR886 west of Goodletle Rd(CR851 22,441 22,112 23,719 27,677 21,942 1.22/° Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 20061 Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 20061 583 6751C 625 567 10 C A limmokslee Q Q -- Gulfs re Dr south of Ba iew Or Rd w east of Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd cR 64C east of Goodlette Rd CR e5t Immokalee Rd cR e4s east of '--on Rd CR 31 6,543 17,913 37,278 30,591 I.. ! 5,961 5,545 21,482 23 577 38,702 40,590 39,031 44,914 v,�oc 5,723 25,970 45,385 46 051 o,agy 7,245 46,620 l.V071, 26.59% 0 2.72% 0 593 C Q Immokelee Rd CR a4i east of Collier Blvd cR 951 19,799 22,138 24,231 23,363 0 568 Q Immokalee Rd Ira 946 east of 1 -75 SR 93 33 077 34,565 38,579 42,933 45,488 5.95% 566 H Q Immokalee Rd cR eae east of US 41 sR 45 amlemi Trail 40,344 37,742 38,985 42,086 0 620 Q Immokalce Rd IM Mal north of Stockade Rd 8,529 8,848 8,685 8,211 8,422 2.49% 586 H Q Immokalee Rd cR e4s south of op Well Rd cR ese 12,504 14,950 76,537 16,485 0 565 Q Immokalee Rd CR e4s west of US 41 CR 45 amiaml Tmit 0 17,305 17,481 18,991 19,168 0.93% 656 C Q Immokalee Rd CR e46 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 16,083 21,489 25,787 27,437 0 672 Q Immokalee Road I.. I 2 miles east of Eve lades Blvd. - 5,125 7331 4,806 5,661 17.78% 684 H Q Immokalee Road CR e4s can 3 miles mat 0129 sane 1 New Co 1,382 1,434 0 679 C Q Immokalee Road cR 848 wen Of NS SR 93 New Col 39,775 45,345 0 674 C Q Immokalee Road cR e4s west of WBson Blvd 17,900 20,460 21,380 21.277 0 677 C Q Immokelee Road East of Everalad es Blvd 5,086 5,224 5,205 0 671 Q Immokalee Road south of Corkscrew Sanctua Road 5,492 6,033 5,348 7,193 34.57% 631 Q J Q C Blvd west of Ai Rd CR 37 12,157 72,040 11,946 72,131 12,110 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 902 1,011 998 705 655 -7.09% 609 Q Lake Trettord Rd 1c0 am west of Carson Rd 6,759 6,547 6,679 6,320 5,887 -8.85% 551 Q Lake Trafford Rd Im a-I west of North 15th St ISR 29 12,265 12,004 72,280 12,337 12,435 0.79% 690 C Q Livin ston Ra CR eet t.s m norm W Golden Gate P CR 886 5,192 20,947 29,759 0 574 Q Livin ston Rd CR eat north of MedBerre 11,281 15,086 33.72% 575 C Q Uvi stop Rd cR 8a1 north of Pine Rid Rd CR ass 16,409 0 597 C Q Livin ston Rd CR eat south of Immoknlee Rd CR IWa 576 C Q Livin stop Rd Ira es1 south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 13,935 0 0 673 Q Livi stop Road CR eet north of Immokolee Road cR s46 3,230 2,840 16,344 19,090 16.80% 686 Q Livin ston Road CR 881 north of Radio Road CR 856 12,136 16,466 19,083 22,934 20,1896 687 Q I-Nin Orin Road CR aet south of Golden Gate Pk cR ess 14,578 23,314 27,696 33,209 19.91% 587 H Q L an Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (cg 896 71,358 13,147 11,683 10,094 0 588 Q L an Blvd south of Pine Ride Rd CR 896 31,182 34,207 29,278 29,523 29,925 7.36% 654 Q L an Blvd s ,fh of Vanderbifl Beach Fact cR 662 9,370 10,984 9,682 8,147 8,037 -1.35% 664 Q Main St sR zs west of South ­ I IJ.3511 12,944 13451 13,627 14,327 5.14% 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951 4,568 4,802 4,, 310 - 4,786 4,661 -2.61% 612 Q New Market Rd I SR 29n east of North 151h St sR 2s 7,875 7,763 8,137 8,633 8,384 -2.88% 550 Q New Market Rd sR 29A south of Broward St 8,269 7,968 7,576 8,405 61993 - 76.80% 663 Q North 15th St sR 1-1 north of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 10,368 10,087 11,085 11,565 12,265. 6.06% 683 H Q Nonh 75th St sR zs south of Lake Trafford Rd cR e90 16,965 16,969 17,574 16,525 0 590 Q North 1st St north of Main St eR 2s 8,133 7,408 7,304 7,977 8,551 7.20% 692 Q North Road west of Air rt Road t CR 31 2,857 2,474 2,916 3,056 4.80% 645 Q Oakes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 11,537 11,822 12,603 13,920 17,401 682 Q Oakes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR sas 10,954 11,241 11,598 11,953 9,765 30% 725 S Oil Well Rd (CR ass east of B' C ress Elem Sch 4,246 5,340 6,692 6,119 6,788 70.93% 649 C/H Q Oil Well Rd CR 8585 east of Imrrwkalee Rd CR 846 547 Q Old US 41 CR 8aT at --County Line 12,553 14,750 14,933 16,312 0 16,490 1.09% 647 Q Oran a Blossom Dr east of Timbedine Or 8,287 9,348 9,074 9,646 10,876 12.75% 526 Q Pine Rid a Rd CR e9e east or Air orl Rd CR 3t ) 53,113 51,966 51,986 53,913 55,097 2.19% 514 C Q Pine Rid a QA­ - east of Goodlette Rd CR 851 53,993 50,035 50,867 0 0 628 Q Pine Ridge Rd CR 896p east of Livingston Rd CR 881 47,494 64,248 35.28 °L Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 20061 Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Ste. A• T' Location 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Change ADT ADT ADT ADT ADT 04 -05 535 Q Pine Ride Rd CRe96 east of Lo an Blvd Santa Barbara 18,329 19,517 21,625 23,481 24,892 6.01% 512 - Q Pine Ride Rd CR 896 east of US 41 SR 45 amiami Tr 38,562 35,446 43,429 37,603 39,369 4.69% 515 Q Pine Ridge Rd cR s96 west of Airport Rd CR 31 45,988 44,655 45,664 48,034 50,289 4.69% 600 Q Pine Ride Rd CR 898 west of L an Blvd 35,028 37,164 39,563 41,965 44,995 722% 634 A Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 627 596 642 730 670 -8.22% 544 Q Radio Rd cR e56 east of A' Rd CR 31 24,112 22,527 23,677 25,538 26,989 5.68% 589 Q Radio Rd cR ass east of Santa Barbara Blvd 15,3211 15,851 15,443 17,599 19,456 10.55% 685 Q Radio Rd CR e56 west of Davis Blvd SR ee 10,218 9,976 10,008 11,435 12,750 11.50% 527 H Q Radio Rd CR 856 west of Santa Barbara Blvd 34,814 24,261 23,858 25 619. 0 688 Q Radio Road CR 856 east of Livingston Road ca 881 26,163 28,593 32,236 32,996 2.35% 689 Q Radio Road CR a56 west of Livingston Road CR 881 211,8 09 22 754 25 778 24 455 5.13% 651 Q Randall BNd east of Immokalee Rd CR e46 5,181 61077 7,135 7,882 9,139 15.95% 534 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 8G0 east of Coun Be m Rd 14,294 15 717 14,537 15,586 14,921 -4.26% 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR am east d US 41 SR 90rraMaM Tr 15,920 15,682 16,703 17,509 18,408 5.13% 518 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 664 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 7,841 9,087 10,051 10,876 11,456 5.33% 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR864) west of County Bam Rd 14,039 14,078 14,852 15,062 15,710 4.30% 648 S Sarlctua Rd north of Immokalee Rd CR 6e6 849 644 721 745 89D 19.40% 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd CR 841 19,8261 20,537 20,111 19,821 19,270 -2.78% 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate P CR 886 27,1591 28,692 25 749 24,146 24,030 -0.48% 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd CR ass 31,D521 27,605 27,194 27,692 28,001 1.12% 528 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pk cR 896 32,9541 30,260 28,914 28,471 28,967 1.74% 511 Q Seagate Dr west of US 41 SR 45 amlam Trail 16,848 16,930 1Q200 15,819 -235% 720 S Shadowiawn Dr north of Davis Blvd SR 84 .17.1271 4,7031 4,8591 4,472 4,005 3,911 -2.36% 523 Q Shadowtawn Dr south of Davis Blvd SR 84 7,9201 7.6761 6,866 6,854 6 432 -6.15% 546 C Q US 41 SR 4.l at Lee roan tine 32,787 37 790 38,280 38,251 0 564 H Q US 41 SR 45 north of Immokalee Rd CR a46 01 53,446 53,988 54,468 D 562 H Q US 41 SR 45 north of Pine Ri a Rd cR e9s 42,102 48,686 49,715 53,026 0 577 Q US 41 SR 45 south of 9981 Ave North 01 47,581 49,071 53,423 51,118 4:32% 561 H Q US 41 SR 45 south of Pine Ride Rd CR s9e 55,6481 54,635 56,497 57,838 0 563 H Q US 41 ISR 45 south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 01 44,546 46,390 49,739 0 604 H Q US 41 SR 90 east of Ai rt Rd CR 31 46,774 45,164 46,908 49,091 0 608 Q IUS 41 ISR 90 east of Collier Blvd cR 951 12,552 12,570 0 12,977 15,010 15.67% 5451C 10 1 US 41 sR 90 east of Davis Blvd SR 84 30,800 33,089 33,594 35,118 0 bf2t. IQ JUS 41 SR 90 east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 36,312 36,301 36,199 37,973 40,948 7.84% 616 A I US 41 SR 90 east of SR 29 /CR 29 5,032 4,661 5,098 4,113 4,360 6.01% 6711 IQ I US 41 SR 90 west of Collier Blvd SR 951 26,082 27,069 0 21,758 0 Pages 3 -7 of 14 March, 2006) Collier County Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts (Five Year History Listed Alphabetically) Pages 3 -7 of 14 Largest Decrease in 2005 traffic - 18.30% Average Change In 2005 traffic 5.08% Largest Increase in 2005 traffic 42.21% March, 20061 ' Location 2001 ADT 2002 ADT 2003 ADT 2004 ADT 20D5 ADT Change 04.05 US 41 (SR 90 west of San Marco Rd (CR 92 5,159 4,952 5,585 5,022 0 US 41 SR 90 west of SR 29 /CR 29 6,126 5,692 6,215 5,049 5,026 -0.46% WOVanderbUt Vanderbilt Beach Ext. CR 862 east of Pelican Ride 22,870 23,203 .24,032 25,554 0 Vanderbilt Beach Rd ca 862 east of Airport Rd (cR at 27,867 26,478 27,734 24,599 0 Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 662 east of Goodlette Rd cR e5t 24,732 24,995 25,761 26,640 0 Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 East of Livi ston Rd cR eat 0 26,756 Vanderbilt Beach Rd cR e6z east of Vine ards Blvd 19,587 15,440 18 03 18,155 18,732 3.18% Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 11,9381 1 1,421 11,247 12,099 13,638 12.72% 629 C Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CH esz West of Livingston Rd CR 881 0 0 667 H Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 west of Oakes Blvd 22,105 21,923 23,072 26,351 0 524 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rtl CR 862 west of US 41 JSR 46/Temieml Tr 20,389 19,171 20,036 20,680 20 080 -2.90% 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr cR 9ot north of Vanderbilt t3ch Rd CR 862 10,791 7,670 8,958 7,223 7,526 420% 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr tcR poll north of 111 th Ave North 13069 10.826 10,863 11,476 12,368 548 H Q Vanderbilt Dr ICR 901 north of Wiggins Pass Rd cR 886 12 506 11,547 9,591 10,685 0 632 Q Vanderbilt Ik cR 981 soOM of 111th Ave N 8,348 6334 5,862 8,049 6,561 8.47% 640 A Ytne ards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd Im 662 7,894 7,711 8,420 7,891 7,722 -2.14% 811 Q Westdox Rd west of Nonn 15th St Lsiq n 4,559 3,391 3,300 3,481 3 396 -2.39% 670 Q ins Pass Rd cR aee east of Vanderbilt Dr t n sot 4,624 4,768 4,836 5,611 6,513 16.07% 669 Q Wins Pass Rd eR aae west of US 47 sR 45 6,513 7,132 7,413 8 104 9 659 19.18% 680 C Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 4,947 5,352 7,390 8,259 10,288 24.57% 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd CR 848 1,330 1,500 1,578 1,528 1,648 7.87% 681 Q Wilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 411 406 411 419 397 -5.31% 650 Q Wilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 4,47051 5,1581 6,852 8,877 9,757 9.91% Pages 3 -7 of 14 Largest Decrease in 2005 traffic - 18.30% Average Change In 2005 traffic 5.08% Largest Increase in 2005 traffic 42.21% March, 20061 Legend for Average Daily Traffic and Quarterly Report 'T: Type of Count A = Annual Count Stations Q = Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi - Annual Count Stations 'A: Current Year (2005) Anomalies: C - Construction, H 2002 501 - Average for the 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 503 - Average for the 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 510 - Average for the 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 533 - Average for the 1st, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 548 - Average for the 1st, 2nd, &.4th Quarters only 559 -. Average for the 1st, & 2nd Quarters only 560 - Average for the 1st, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 568 - Average for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Quarters only 572 - 4th Quarter only 589- Average for the 1st, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only -599 - Average for 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 652 - Average for the 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 655 - Average for the 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Quarters only 670 - Average for the 1st, 2nd, & 4th Quarters only Hurricane Pages 3 -7 of 14 320 /70ofi .� v `m f r O 6 'o XX $m XX X n X m �'i X XXXXXXXXX n �1ii X X XXX XXXXXXXXX °A °m$$ei XX XX X XX .4i8 non mma r ry maim aoa °A qn$ N o H n d OO n N O N N OO m d O OO q 1 Q a? O N f V I V NO 1� d N m yn`qI O m Fi 0 N W O N+ n n ' nb 1-1 N A n n n n tl 0 q n N N N n g n n n N^ n tl\ N N 0 m N g N q O r F W b 0 n fl N S n n n n n pppp yy NNOAmp�ro�m100_W yy 00NONi_� mNN O W gp0f� �pp� yY -P �p p �N�N mmp ON m y� � �pV�dw a mO p �1pp m � n d N N N VyldOOngTNN dN -I; bum d ON \ Oyl n N N n n n N ; N w� W tV N\ m O N TIT N n N 1m9 0 0 W W N 0q F n m n n O N n 0 � O N � O IIpp pp A19 aa N m N N n b m X m X19 4= Q � A NIry O N F O� N b�tlt?nq r1pNJO1N� ON0 q q V ONgNO On NOIwO mX� W n Yb 0 1pO OO 1N X17 O1 OON �0pj Fw �\mm�pp n y N Rmn �mnlV Nnn N + n1N9 g1p9 \N�n L!\ NH NNn\ m N N 0 A 0p � ppm��K O NmO� lyylpp V 1 0 O n n h O N b N O n W d V l V m d N N O OOyyII n H YaS g S Oi i°NONOON p E �1m9 N109Y� 1D 1n 11HWO ��t9 ClNN N N(n9 A O n19M� �y N N O d 0 W nn�N�� O O A n FNNn � N 0 NOmN 0 0{ W Im q m� lNm Nq XXXpX X�ppXXxXX19XXXX X X XgeXX X Z6 ; 1.1 Y AYNmA OOQm�n OPOOON 0H0 NY11p4 NNN�Y� H NCI N O b A 0 NOIp tl p y '� ytlNONi ry y O N Im 101f m O N O m p \ A r m 0 tl qr b Ofn'1 W Nf AS YI � 19 qq ♦♦♦♦ 33 myq S Sn N 0 n O n N r 1g9019g0 W O�OA n� �CiAr hH�O mN V n Nnn +N V � \ CIn Olry NN NNrvn Y1nN�n .rvn Nryn�� n�NNN O N17 Nt'lr �1pO Ml605' --- V N Q n n N N N N N n N n N N N N N d N N n X X q Xq X pXp X qqNC V 1W ro N W p Xp X 19 9101 X X q, X X \� X X W X hONO�mOpp'm X X X X X X m Xm X X X X AAA X X r X X� J X p Xp X jnN�N Nmi �lQ of qi l7c ^.- lri of o_wle oi�vi le oi�wiT 1ef gO��lmm apNmwHm NOIN Im 1p�QNj q q� -N�byO ^'O'q N 1q'1 �1ND 1�lglY Q m d N p N n yN 0 N 0Nn0O $�S b <Im'IO ' r O O1mr AH'n1 N 00A�n \K 0 q O A3 Olb1M1OlNl�1 An`p � O 0N 0 Oy 0+ Ntl r 109 N v n O m�00¢yl NNa7mOgN0 O ro N1mpm� rym W m NNm��t9 N mNm O ppOA N AO1AO O! qd IpmONn 1t) d Amd O- AIMFAmOO ONi�Ib9�0 N Nm N1g9'q fv mdotl F na NgONmb N N �' N 1111 N 1 AOmO \ � F A y N X X X X X X X X N � X X X X X X J c- p'°.1Y'�rYR °OI R OP�ntl ONV�NnN�N A�bN w �11j aO�N7 �^.1�YTW1T��mI.Nr,p'R'b O m m e�i p 0 ry A 0 Oa N g q m h � O w m A n N\ V N q h r p O O Ann a 1qp 1bp 1OO O W O A r� r y O W � i 1pi1 1Hy \ pmpnA 009 11pp 10 10 T-1VH N p g N n 199 N ry N n y O n d d m N H N d N N p 19 N N n n N N 1tl9 o f gg 8U Y w S^ a a K a N u u w Y i E ^ g Q n w E 9 o`oQn oy_w¢aaa w¢ wmm¢= o_mrc a 3 � m$m >�mmm¢omrcmmmY;o¢ma w. m a K m m w m¢ K a u 10 w m m m w a� 'm � U' � x 1- E._ ¢$ ¢¢ t¢i L° m> � e _a n y a° m m K a m m[ ¢ y w y LL i• v a� v w m m 0: '° m � Q .2 N a (4 m a ¢ Q O Y > w O C W W O E L Q E V m `o aol�izOa1 = C`0 9 U`°' ayNEa C U� U� 30S W q Y �. b W M N V O,LL O >OC! oa J FJ O lO O J O - Z m m m u m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000<a 0a 0000000000000a0a000000 ¢am1mW000000000000000 1° N N vOl b Vql N N d N n N N h N m N h O n b� N m fD �p b^ IOO N h b y N m 9NI Vnl b N N b b� b In0 b b vni vOi q O O ..-.... n O O g m O v `m f r O 6 r O �q nW U � m m m X tl m 17 N 1Xm N A � ' N P X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XY X X X O Z. N W I Y r Of y W^ W 0 Y Y O l pXp RQ N^ Y • p' W t m 1 V O Q t C m C l f ^N V Ol r IA m W O ryCIO N ^ ^O•G A Y^ Y P O m N N f y ^ m V n m C° TOP m A S R m a tlRNr R00m W $M1q N1Y'14Y.V 17 Og1Y RtAY� �mnmytl °Nml� my H � m N N Y tl N C! CI N 6 N m n N m ^ N O N m f V Oi m 'q A q m 00� Ol O NINV m O I SOY V l W NCO Clmm a0 S m Oy wA Ol t•f X XXX XXyXpXX t O O w m m ml b w R XX X N 0 X X^XX XyXXXpXX R XXX XXX XX XXXX XXX XXXX X QN •j m 0 Y H q tl R n 4^ Y O le O m m W N A IWO O N O! R m m N T m � N mN m m N m m O O tl M1 A A ry p p m m w O O N W Y m tNO O^ N N P _N Q 7 N _m W N m _m N T y Y N w If R f A�Nq Sf O41pPI1 n V m � r oIw` N hOS�Ob m NmNHNpW Oq R O1 NINV MmIRN OOH NA RORO ASS OAS IA9 N OyNNr fm1 INV � rnS IpO tVN mmMS Ye Y PyO mNIHO A¢¢N�� wT V HS N O q N N R n N$ O 0 coil N n O om pwq� Y R m N N r n b O mm O 0 O w m M j Rim SYVHSSNm m Y� m CmYm l• O yN °m ) �n �W 0^ ^ ¢m ry � • h wO N OV OW ^O m tl ^ m m�N w ^ N mm I m Nm mR Y m P O O N �O O A N m pO A O VV I� Omp RA I dR Y NN OO SA S N X X X X X X X N NAO AA wY XXXX X X X X M1M V NmY YA X X X � X X� X X X XXXXXX � XXXX XXX X X X X X� Xw � sNom. o tl A�N O� W TNtlN ¢I �Pw A NCI -..1y•pN NmN� NNmAmNO Y10m W NOVA m1! RYA NdIT mY OA ANA W q- f m m NA TryHy mT �T °¢I0 m �y R wPNbN H V Oy NR q W N1y. ONiP OO 1O V �w O pNP ny p +N 1'1 lVIORA�PAbN1� N HIH9PMPAONASR�OmHO ry O clO ^R ,$j ,Y, O p Y� m O �OSg Tj mO1 V SYNm m N Y 1.1 A • N•pp y W NOOINO� w N m m O V m y� N1710•J m�w wm pp �00�mOR°l 1yym yy 1yum��m m m A N^ iO O Y Y N O O N� N m Hy a A^ Vj ry N b N H� tl H oM1ly�� {; m O m H N Y m M1 m O gt�(roW m Orw m N N N w b qn � Ip m X X XXX XXXXXXXX N t N Y N m � A mp AAO mwA•mmlm XXXXX tl q < b Y A XX XX W' y �xy XXXXXX q ^ XXX X�X XX XXXXX X Sm m dlw� 1�m� ^1•!NA ^ � Ol tON�NM VlN m10NON q Nm O �N m' pygnRY NIAmR W OYm pb0 $y.• ��RmS o q �. p ^ • • ^ ^ � ^ m ^ Y Ny�h TN ¢i OIL N0 CI ^ NrI NA O H m S m pP A Y N �A• N^ P N '1 aA N N H O m O O m N m O O H N mA 3S• O qqN 1�O" nm O N !1 O O1 R R� MIF A N O ^ n S S 1 v N � V � '�O ^ OO�OY p m P Yt Y N m bO OY w1ryV mmm ••ppp1NNN� O � IW�l A NA tlV nm W yN� fpNgAOOm m OY m�i OAI '! n V� l W qN iA O m°lI Ow O pOA O m ry Y S N tl N •WN i OY l O W OflA0 my PN tOg. O ON N 0 N O ryR N OO l N a R V ' N m 1-1-T T 210 - m N �O m NS p w Y 1Jm N Y t'1 N X XXXXXXX t_ N O� •Ai g N A h m XX m N XX�X�pp XXy-X N N O� 0 O p XpXp��XX X pX tl� N n� R X XXXXXXa Am pXXXX VX XX XXX y -qX X�XOXX 0N 0�: '4TaN.7 .-� m� m'Y 1�I�AjW O O HAyO •D N f N N R 0O0 O V O 0 R [VANVOiOm' R m O h O O S IYV OHS mX 0 N O 10 N �N9T.y ^ ^ yyN ^ WWN�'(4Y p tl Y y 0 q y ♦♦q Y N O N V O ml1b O^ N w w Plo O N O N- b O N R tl�� n M1 O m A A g m OfpAN� N Y �p Nm tl O R t0 N � l0 -tlA m^ A ap Y N Oryi O O Im N m m g m m O g N O f ^ m y pp A^ N w W Y A A m H O N w A m tl m m N A N 0 w N O m H l7 •)1")myA Y OON°f G m•n mtlNNN�N y y Y A N N O A A(7^ g W O y W m y ••l Y yNYYN ^NYN Ow„ N� ^n^ �1V ROO OiN' °l °iO mN m10Y Ipm mOO O�NN�- A tlNY NY N q S $ a rc p m m ^ • � � ¢ m .. � � m�+ � N i h � ¢ u Q Q rv¢ �¢ L^ m�: e E •b K Zy u u m m O r W a i n F� m b Q 2 `d^ C o m m a' m W o m m$ � y y o p • K ¢ ¢ ¢ e u a A�- � m Y O m O m m O U U' Q m�> E& m Q c N N L O O O Y N N O• N N$ _O c E m � `m w� � E }� • o y m a E w c — � E c w v E c E d ¢• '- o C �° m m o E O �p`U. � b yti0 • U2 $ Qo m w i ua ° �z c t 5¢ l9 of Q _uim y¢ Q E m m c u q `o `0 3 a (� —> o o m • v U o a—Y `o `o `o -6 y > a Q `mE `m -� W Q '' ., m a` -- 0 b O O — 6 m 0 0 O O L L L O L L L m m g J d d W d 3 Z m 3 3 '[ t J t° 0• m E m° R R• N yJ m O y O V C L C •$ C m^ N V d V d d C • 3 3 3 O O O O O n OV C_ ✓ m m C o m^ O << y�� m• m N m o y o 0 3 ¢¢¢ O D U U {J U U U U U U U U U D D a m m¢ Q m¢ Q U U O L•° O V V p �y Y `m m m g N 0 a. $ a D a Q Q Q Q m Q D_• Q' a• d• Q Q m D a` O O p R R' LL' U a D O O V D_' Q.' ¢ K¢ a a 3 c Q h g g K C rc Q Q Q Q c °� � •�'a N i0 i0 ;° U U U U � i� Q¢ K� K ¢° ¢ E V m O� I� • N V• d N • o V m m V m N d d o V o 0 0 0 0 o O o o O o O O o U m E E E E 0 0 E E E E E E E E E E F191, U• t7 U U tj O E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E F�j00000¢ 00000000000000000 ¢00000000000000 N0000000Hy0000000000a0 • Y y H N •7 N N A rJ H O B N P W N Y m W •p �p I- N A m N N tp (V N •p •p N N N N 10 m b N m N p N A •O m A Y 17 � O f pOj Y A m mM1i � n m m H m N ID m m 10 10 1p N IV N y b N N b m b N Y ry b M1 •D N O N tN0 N N O N N N Y W m b y •WV •mp n n a b •V IYp N Y m N N N 00 N •N° h fin.. M Y r O �q nW U �Y p N R Y• R 'Y R R 1? ' 1y R'� 9'r V N N O 1? tV O Cl °v O Pr 1�p '1 ry NP 4 M � O mry g N.A m A P an O n q P A� W A MN m nw N n N Y\ p M � N N HN w P N � P PV V no S n O H N �g eN g n wV H VN A n � P q o0 q r M y N N V q N . m n m O P P n N Cl � N V g P m Nw OO w 10 P i M n 0 nO p 0 oN n nO 4 w ^ 3 4 n P n o tl mN 1ry w ry �1 q 1yp pp� y py1 pO pp� py Iyp 8 1yp1 �10� a 1p� Vq m M Aga v ri x Mxw bNO�OXimbPNnNq Npmi7 PtxV V N V 0AX ON yx MxlXpn lxOOINA qXq O N b;x 0y M 4Xyyxg0XOxiNO VY O'Vj 1; 1V �I�NO p m N � ry bT17 n1'140 0"NOi� N� tlN {7b' ml plO b�NRPnN �QT n000N00N10 ^wqN N A V 4 b m m N H N P fl;: M V H N 0 P g M O w O q O N O n 111y...� b m • P n p W p q N p' ' N 4 N V n g P ' V wP mN gONmV�mnn' ♦OfOn'1bHhVN gONANp�r^OfVtl� �PVmOS i G O POP g N O N P 1� 1y n A n g N O H rv�rvM rv1Y �n n rvrvry �N� � A U o MO N000 001Wp YIO q'O OOi M 1N0Or1'1��� hNbbN lO nldl A lM'1b� mPSNO Ci VJO NOON A, V Sf W gNN�fwtl lVNq� N'APONdM400N« VlW ONOIC OI OIa�ViNboom�0117Nb000A�wOA� mPH Q _ 4 a _ _ a s E a¢ a o• a 1� ¢ m a � a m a y c a u m C q U w m a Q m m N 1° m y _° 0 y O N Z p' 1n ? U o m U m ¢ $ m x m L Y m m E ° ° m° m R a A V a U S V Y L � K Y � C O• V LL U � � m y C C J J m 3 a Y 0 0 0~ '> O m L a¢ J €€ V M N N a m °e V 3 „', • 3" m' ° T) • A$ � y E `m o o `o o o E $ N ym o 0 0 om° m m? E a q y O 3 a O C C L N° L^ N q m m¢ 6¢ a¢ N¢ y 6 Q u 0 0 0 U. U C C O z m 0 O E c� E E E • 4 f£ 4 0 3 q Y C C ti t. F A n F 1-1- H F m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 m� m m� o�> C m m m C c L O m ti F n h- a a s n ban p n 4 4 LL m m m V O y P P N F m V V m ry ry ry �p V V aV V V d 1 d y V m V V C C C C C C (: mrcm¢mrc¢¢mHmwln NNmHmmmmmnF��'r= AFFFAFAFF »» » »» »33333 � a FVOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOWOO¢a¢¢ 0000000000 a000O0000000000G0000000 mW N m mmn r W m� oN VP m�m�^ Nmc en ao mo mm,owd1°m10 o'� mn Vm o� o om� •q J w a s S r C E L C m 3p d r 3 i a • E e t C os m m N N c 'c o oU V V C m Q � x IUI ao 1i L Y 1 3 a � ~ 1 1x0 Oxi b b0l C Cl yXy X Xq NmmiO<ONm�pT x x a app X X X X X XX x xX X XXXxXXX p Q 1 1�M O OmObO�N d dw w w nn W W N M M � � p p n n m m 1 1Nr10 O OYOI. h hSA� N N V pXXX N H Q V N N'Om N rv0 V n Q V P N N n a N N O ( (O N N n N pp m mm O n P P m OOoozy! m mb N N N N m q M M w ' m v W q' I vvWW,�So} p O S pp r ry N N w�-NH N NIh O O N N n O)O ^ ^'N 04'C l 0 6) m lV O O q qN�h V OAOI 4 V n Y 4yy 041r�0 C4SON1°1°NNNNm�N�wCmAMN q IH. 0 0 0 0 N N N O O S O N N m m O m m O b b o N N 10 0 0 m m 0 0 e w ry X N X X x x x x x X X x x X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x X x x x x X X X X x x X X X x x x x X X x X X X X x X X x x N N NOi N NgNN W 17 w w n W b bw O b t ObM n n« n O - - A n I Ile O O O O S SA O Oqm P 1p 0 NONnN W 01 W O O m N N V T M O t tl 0 n m O b O A A O O O O O N O f 0 n m V V n N N n m m O O m m N N H H r r O b O O 4 4 O O O N P P M M 4 O fi w w A A N � � n A A S S 4 P P r r N N � N N N N N N N � � � V V • •1 A p � ��0O1 1 1NDn 4 4O�N ` `0�1°Jm O OaOPq O ONI � � V VNI � 1 � �p y °){O{yy m m{rq{O��rOjS O y y y1 A W 0 N NN ^ ^Sn{rNt��1ON p A P N A A O w w A A O N N m O O M M n n n N 0 0 n n S mM0m0 � S N N N 00ppA W W� n ntY Y V N Y10Oq�b� g g N N N gOgq a 0 N O a1PO � m o q �b V V V V N N O g 4 S N N N t t7 N N V N N . N 0 q W W x m x x x x x x x X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X X X x X X X x x x X X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x X X X x X X x x x x X M 4�Oa ^ ^q�m�H40YYY4N+yOO � N1n0010q�0�w n nb htD 0 �1�0 « 0 O OOO N NMOryby O Or O OgP�Y��OOmN1� M MOI W 11)IVNOO t W (O II;�A b t?Y?y 1 m M Mm -NO 1` aaN N (1p°Or X 1�Cl Y Y^l t tVp� S g Nb A A� V V A A Nn� � �OAHq N Nr O OO � � r ryfP'1 + pO O V1H 1 Y� N NO t tl�IA10P1 ( X00 O O (H�O I IV 0 001 q q �r1 + ++ � 10 Y POnOO n n1� P P mM�� n 4 O mm m b A V V Ny W m { N m m'O N1O N N A A N 0 A A V d 1 1p N N A A w m m O h h O O V b N N {0 8 tl O O N 8V o 0 0 0 oy { {� S r ri wN N N�nm)N N NOt7 H p0 0 H V 1Yi0 X VV b N V q qHH q qN f M 0 0 O O O N N {V V O O A A q q O O O1 H H ax p px x xx x xlx�XXX x xxxxx x O A b xx x xxxxxXxxxx x gMMAN 1 1r1� W W w xx x xxxXxxxxxxx x xxxxxXxx $m ^C H H O r r Y 1'{ l V 1 1mm q q, O V OR C bm W lV O O w4wOOl l O V lV 4 4 m mn O 00NMNOyygppMO P 11 g g10q V P 1 1O m m V O q4 7 7 p p C CHNO'ON •q J w a s S r C E L C m 3p d r 3 i a • E e t C os m m N N c 'c o oU V V C m Q � x IUI ao 1i L Y 1 3 a T N e N O O O O Oq 9 a TO: Ft. My,, C 546 TO: Bonita Springs of R 547 - 548 Old 41 (887) s >. 9 670 0 1 Vigpry 69 Pass (888) 64 673 57 13.563 566 62 Immokale 7 568 656 58 111 Ave N 93 63 94 54 ssr 577 679 682 655' 38 33 'Oakes Blvd t anderbilt each 45 52 ---kL6` S9 630 68 CR 662 5 Orange B10530 6a6 .595 9 e� Dr. 34 58 570 L 99 647 Ve 64 a _ SB 1 A 96 . Y" O 31 Id G GOLDEN GATE BL' 56 0 ,.561 R A 87 Sll PINE RID SG[ _ 535 536 512 D 514 26 L' 60 B 56 L 6 51 T 1 58 L E 7 V 6 2 643 U T R 5 S T S 69 d S GREEN BLVD E 501 R B 29 4 D GO L EN GATE B PKWY 25 1 S R 04 533 5 8 687 91 SD . 03 510 7 D 6 3 68 S 28 6969 2 SDIO 6D -75 City of 55 327 B 589 683 60 73 7 DAVIS BLVD 688 537 e60 Naples C 54 , S2 59 S 19 538 O 52 3 641 L 52 S8 04 County Barn Rd L 20 5] E 03 51 RATTLESNAKE HAYSHOPE S7 HAMMOCK RI) D3 DR U B ' S L NLely Cultural 57 4 Pkwy 1 D (951) Station 570 is SBB: Santa Barbara Boulevard — 571 5 32 located on US 41 west of San Liv Rd: Livingston Road (CR 881) 557—` Marco Road Golden Gate Boulevard (CR 876) 60 To: Miami 660 >:1 •�.... . [:ol4r tau�t� I6iy Mep v.y. vM U �,� 4 ye Y n a V w e A b � � w `P T x U y Y � E a o � c ° M M V N � O' A e y �6 i Cr �, 4 n, a y � V Y. gg �gp V e a Z r` ti M1 V m g N A �yy N •� W ?1 ^p U G C a u SR 82 661 11 1117 591 611 WeAC108 Extemio 612 Canon Rd 610 663 SR 29A (Nev, Marl 609 Lake Trafford 551 Street) 683 SR 29 (North 15th Street) Btr ward St 550 590 6 19 SR 29 (Mam CR 84 tree — 664 549 SR 29 684: CR 665 846 East3 miles east Collier County of 29 South Department of N Transportation Operations CR846 (tat Street S) Al Immokalee City Area 620 Traffic Count Stations Stockade Rd. Immokalee Area Map Page 14 or 15 March, 2006 Janis Scenic Ik \614 SR 29 US 41 (SR 90) 6t 615 582 16 Collier County Department of cR 29 Transportation Operations Copeland & Everglades City Area Traffic Count Locations N 634 Plantation Parkway 618 CR 29 (Choloinskee Cwe ay) Copeland Area Map page 15 of 15 March, 2006 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT H PUBLIC FACILITIES Level of Service Analysis Traffic Impact Statement Supplemental Traffic Comments Response — July 28, 2006 Public Facilities Map Public Facility Service Providers GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 PUBLIC FACILITIES: l.a. Potable Water Public facilities are not available in the immediate area and therefore the development of the parcel will require installment of a potable water well to be permitted consistent with the applicable provisions of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including FDEP and SFWMD and capacity will minimally meet the standards of the Florida Administrative Code. l.b. Sanitary Sewer Public facilities are not available in the immediate area and therefore the development of the parcel will require installment of a septic tank system to be permitted consistent with the applicable provisions of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including FDEP and SFWMD. l . d. Drainage The proposed development will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day stone standards and other applicable standards of the LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including the SFWMD. Le. Solid Waste The established Level of Service (LOS) for the solid waste facilities is two years of landfill disposal capacity at present rate fill rates and ten years of landfill raw land capacity at present fill rates. No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities from this 45,000 square foot project. LE Parks: Community and Regional The proposed development will not increase the population density; therefore will have no affect on the community and regional parks. Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 04 -12 -05 PUBLIC FACILITIES: l.c. Arterial & Collector Roads Project Transportation Consultant, Metro Transportation, has prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis for the conceptualized development program for the subject property. Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 04 -12 -05 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE VIII. CONCLUSION 0 I. INTRODUCTION Metro Transportation Group, Inc. (Metro) has conducted a traffic impact statement for the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. The site is located in the southeast corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and SW ls` Street in the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County, Florida. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1. The proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 15` Street site will allow for the development of a maximum of 45,000 square feet of commercial floor area. Access to the site is being proposed via three access locations, full access points to SW I" Street and Wilson Boulevard in addition to a rightin/right out access to Golden Gate Boulevard. This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways and intersections. Trip generation and assignments to the various site access drives will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. Il. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the north by Golden Gate Boulevard and vacant land zoned for commercial uses. To the west, the site is bordered by SW 0 Street. On the southern property boundary, the subject site is bordered by vacan t land that is zoned for residential uses. To the east, the site is bordered by Wilson Boulevard and vacant land that is zoned for commercial uses. Golden Gate Boulevard is a four -lane divided arterial roadway that borders the subject site to the north. Golden Gate Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. The Level of Service Standard on the section of Golden Gate Boulevard from Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard is LOS "D or- 2,350 vehicles. The nearest signalized intersection on Golden Gate Boulevard in the vicinity of the subject site is Wilson Boulevard approximately 680 feet to the east of SW I" Street. Page 1 O PROJECT LOCATION MAP Revised 6/7/05 GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 1 .2th AV NW 1 7= -77 -az as -:;L- mn --Z- -.z-- 10-1 pod "aa 7Z- Z7- A PROJECT LOCATION MAP Revised 6/7/05 GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 1 0 Wilson Boulevard is a two -lane collector roadway that borders the subject site to the east. Wilson Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of Collier County. Concurrency is not measured on Wilson Boulevard since it is classified as a collector roadway. The intersection of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard currently allows full turning movements under signalized conditions. SW 15i Street is a two -lane local roadway that borders the subject site to the west. SW Isi Street is under the jurisdiction' of Collier County. Concurrency is not measured on SW I" Street since it is classified as a local roadway. The intersection of SW I" Street and Golden Gate Boulevard currently allows full turning movements under unsignalized conditions. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 151 Street CPD will allow for the development of a maximum of 45,000 square feet of commercial floor area within the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County. Table 1 summarizes the land use utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject development. Table 1 Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 15t Street CPD Land Uses Shopping Center 45,000 square feet (LUC 820) Access to the subject site is proposed via full access points to SW I't Street and Wilson Boulevard in addition to a right - in/right out access to Golden Gate Boulevard. SW I" Street will provide full unsignalized access to Golden Gate Boulevard while Wilson Boulevard's intersection with Golden Gate Boulevard operates under signalized conditions. Page 3 0 IV. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7th Edition. Trip generation calculations were performed for the development based on a "worst case" trip generation scenario for the proposed commercial use. Therefore, the trip generation calculations were performed based on Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) for, the commercial use. The equations for these land uses are contained in the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 2 outlines the 'anticipated weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour trip generation of the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 151 Street CPD. The daily trip generation is also indicated within Table 2. Table 2 Trip Generation Golden Gate Boulevard (a, SW V' Street CPD The shopping center trips shown in Table 2 will not all be new trips to the adjacent " roadway system. ITE estimates that shopping center uses such as the one identified within this analysis typically attract anywhere from 8% to 89% of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. This traffic, called "pass -by" traffic, reduces the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but does not decrease the actual driveway volumes. Based on the equation contained within the " ITE Trip Generation Handbook, approximately 49% of the proposed retail trips will originate from vehicles already traveling" the adjoining roadway network. Therefore, a 49% pass -by traffic reduction was applied to the retail trips as a part of this analysis. For this analysis, the "pass -by" traffic was accounted for in order to determine the number of "new" trips the development will add to the surrounding roadways. Table 3 summarizes the pass -by percentage for the shopping center use indicated within Table 2. Table 4 summarizes the development traffic and the breakdown between the new trips Page 4 n1 � - Shopping Center 60 35 95 1 175 1 195 L 370 4,040 (451 000 s . ft:) The shopping center trips shown in Table 2 will not all be new trips to the adjacent " roadway system. ITE estimates that shopping center uses such as the one identified within this analysis typically attract anywhere from 8% to 89% of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. This traffic, called "pass -by" traffic, reduces the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but does not decrease the actual driveway volumes. Based on the equation contained within the " ITE Trip Generation Handbook, approximately 49% of the proposed retail trips will originate from vehicles already traveling" the adjoining roadway network. Therefore, a 49% pass -by traffic reduction was applied to the retail trips as a part of this analysis. For this analysis, the "pass -by" traffic was accounted for in order to determine the number of "new" trips the development will add to the surrounding roadways. Table 3 summarizes the pass -by percentage for the shopping center use indicated within Table 2. Table 4 summarizes the development traffic and the breakdown between the new trips Page 4 00 the development is anticipated to generate and the "pass -by" trips the development is anticipated to attract. Table 3 Pass -by Trip Reduction Factors Golden Gate Boulevard (a7 SW I't Street CPD Table 4 Trip Generation — New Trips Gnlden Gate Rnnlevnrd (a)�SW lst Street CPD K�ss$✓€ �Zs4�4 {dk�,^.�:Yrt�>?�hA��.,s. 6T�o�.A^`4'S' -, > 2.t,`�,u.ne,.h �i�d,iC a.'fl„�+,�s atidG to � � 6 :a �.. �.,3 n• kx35ar � . 4 s. z' ''v ed a.:. ����.. �. 41Q Shopping Center 49% (45,000 s 175 Table 4 Trip Generation — New Trips Gnlden Gate Rnnlevnrd (a)�SW lst Street CPD K�ss$✓€ �Zs4�4 {dk�,^.�:Yrt�>?�hA��.,s. 6T�o�.A^`4'S' -, > 2.t,`�,u.ne,.h �i�d,iC a.'fl„�+,�s i�,�3�'.S�F..Nd. .n.4.. %l�sa. .�A ��4`✓�4 Trip Generation 60 35 95 175 195 370 x,040 Less Pass -by Traffic -30 -15 -45 -85 -95 -180 -1,980 New Trips 30 20 50 90 100 190 ' 2,060 ' V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The trips shown in Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based upon the anticipated routes the drivers will utilize to approach the site. The total trips shown in Table 2 were assigned to the proposed site access drives. The project distribution utilized for the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD was assumed based upon the general lack of similar commercial sites within the Golden Gate Estates. Thus, approximately 60% of the development traffic was assumed to originate from the west while the remaining 40% of the development traffic was assumed to come from the north, east, and south. The project distribution for the proposed development is indicated in Figure 2. It should be noted that the project traffic was not distributed to Collier Boulevard due to the fact that it unlikely that a significant amount of the, project traffic will originate from the Collier Boulevard corridor. There are several planned /existing commercial opportunities along the Collier Boulevard corridor, so the majority of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD traffic will originate from within the Golden Gate Estates'area. Page 5 o j IMMOKALEE ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH I ROAD w J O m w w J O U PINE RIDGE ROAD GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD 4 -60 %-Po- IFGFND 4-20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION 0 w J O 20% ca z z O U J i-i w w 2iaf ♦10 %♦ 100% PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Revised / 2 GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1 St St CPD Figure G' Based upon the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 2, the project traffic was distributed to the projects access points to Wilson Boulevard, SW 1st Street, and Golden Gate Boulevard. Figure 3 indicates the site traffic assignment for the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1St Street CPD. This graphic also indicates the site traffic assignment to Golden Gate Boulevard's intersection with Wilson Boulevard and SW 1St Street. VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 3 %- 3 % -5 % Significance Test. Therefore, the project traffic was compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour — Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the most recent Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet. A copy of the most recent Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet is attached in the Appendix of this report for reference. Based on the information contained within Table IA, no roadway links will be significantly impacted in accordance with the Collier County 3 %-3 % -5% Significance Test. Therefore, Concurrency link analysis was only required on Golden Gate Boulevard adjacent to the subject site. In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table 1A also includes a concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity indicated within Table IA was taken from the Collier County Concurrency Management System online at the interactive GIS map. The project traffic was then subtracted from the remaining trips in order to obtain determine the remaining capacity after the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW Is' Street CPD traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. Page 7 SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Revised 6/7/05 _ _ GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 3 0 VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Based upon the information contained within Table IA, sufficient capacity will be available on the Collier County roadway network after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD traffic. Figure 4 indicates the remaining capacity on the significantly impacted roadway links based upon the existing conditions as well as after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW ist Street CPD traffic. As canoe seen within Table IA and Figure 4, there will be available capacity after the addition of the traffic associated with the subject development, so there are no concurrency issues on the Collier County roadway network. Intersection analysis was required as a result of the proposed development at the site access location to Golden Gate Boulevard. In order to perform the intersection analysis at this intersection at build -out, the through volumes on Golden Gate Boulevard were assumed to be the same in each direction. The peak hour, peak direction through volume was calculated by subtracting the remaining capacity on Golden Gate Boulevard from the total capacity available for the roadway. In other words, 812 trips (remaining capacity) were subtracted from 2,350 trips (total capacity) in order to determine that the existing peak hour, peak direction traffic volume on Golden Gate Boulevard is 1,538 vehicles. The intersection turning movements indicated within Figure 3 were added to the 1,538 vehicle through volume in order to perform the intersection analysis. These volumes were then inputted into the latest Highway Capacity Software (HCS2000) based on the right - in/right -out conditions of the site access intersection to Golden Gate Boulevard. Based upon the results of the intersection analysis, the northbound approach to Golden Gate Boulevard will operate at LOS "C" or better after the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW ls` Street site traffic to the surrounding roadway network. The intersection analysis results can be found in the Appendix of this report for reference. Page 9 N W E w w J S p N.T.S. 0 ¢O IMMOKALEE ROAD 0 w O m VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD ZO 812 m o (767) w GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD O m w 812 vi J (752) O PINE RIDGE ROAD LEGEND XXX - CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (XXX) - REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PROJECT fff REMAINING CAPACITY ON Revised 6/7/05 0) SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED ROADWAYS Figure 4 __ __ GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1 st St CPD LLL7 LLLJ Based on the results of the intersection analyses, no intersection improvements will be required to the site access intersection to Golden Gate Boulevard as a result of the added development traffic. Turn lane improvements will be required when the development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network based on the Collier County Ordinance 93 -64. Turn lanes will be required on Golden Gate Boulevard at its intersection with the proposed right - in/right -out access driveway. Additionally,. a westbound left turn lane will likely have to be constructed on Golden Gate Boulevard at the SW Is` Street intersection after the addition of the development traffic. A southbound right turn lane on Wilson Boulevard may be required as a result of the added development traffic as well. However, the specific turn lane improvements will be determined as a part of the SDP process when a more specific development scenario is available for the subject site. VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed re- zoning of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 1s` Street CPD in the southeast corner of the Golden Gate Boulevard /SW Is` Street intersection within the Golden Gate Estates area of Collier County, Florida will not adversely impact the Collier County roadway network. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the most recent Collier County Concurrency Management System. Based upon the analysis contained within this report, no roadway segments are shown to experience a significant impact as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Golden Gate Boulevard is shown to have sufficient capacity after the addition of the traffic associated with the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW I" Street CPD. Therefore, no roadway link improvements will be required as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Intersection analysis was performed at Golden Gate Boulevard's intersection with the proposed right - in/right -out site access as a result of the proposed development. Based on the results of the intersection analysis, all of the analyzed intersection approaches are shown to operate at LOS "C" or better when the development traffic is added to the Page 11 00 surrounding roadway network. Therefore, no intersection improvements will be required as a result of the proposed Golden Gate Boulevard @ SW 151 Street CPD. Turn lane requirements are likely as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. However, the specific turn lane requirements will be reviewed at the SDP stage when a more specific development scenario is available for the subject site.. Based on the analysis contained within this report, the re- zoning of the proposed Golden. Gate Boulevard @ SW 151 Street CPD will not adversely affect the future traffic conditions within the vicinity of the project site. All roadway links and intersections analyzed as a part of this report will operate acceptably when the development traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. \k:\2005 \03\ 19\ I O \report.dm Page l APPENDIX \ i }\ { \ \\ { \ )} }LU } § / § a 7 q /wwr /) 4 § 3 IL ¥/R n z 2 b f § 2 2 2 \ k Lu J c L d § k $ 4 IL ) E � y R § ) CL wu w G @ * ^ ` \ ) / ) , L w /�} �� 00 � < R< 0, ° _ a. to § / § G _ - j) ) g ) U. . z 2 ■/2» K \\ � / )) _- (§ U)\ x of §j\ /( }} !! §) #/ § R §) \ i }\ { \ \\ { \ )} COLLIER COUNTY CONCURRENCY SPREADSHEET V' (O (O N(OO p V OMM (D� V W pO W NNfo (O V (D W OI�c- u]OOtO aDp N`! N O(- M mO V m01 V w m r 0 m MM r mrr (D V Mt N M(- N V (,- p m m w (o to ,.t M M M O N O) OD W O (0 O M (O O) O V W N O t0 W N N N N m 7? N N N M (D N (D �V M M M (O t0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD N M M M N N O 0 m r M M m m N aD N M r O N M M N r O N O N N N N O r CO m W 01 O M N NNN N r m' V W (D N O (D I M O- aD N M r N N O W W W W W O o o W O O o O o W W W W o o o W W O o W WOW W W o o o O W W � Ommmm � V N V V d'N'70 M (D V N(D wco"Nmw V (D (D (O d V'NNOm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M � N '- � M N N N � N M 7 7 M •- �-- N M M a- M M N M M M � N �- M M Y v C m m0 0 rn -O m U a Y N (> a a Y d N m m m N o m 0 U S 3 `a o o �0 o Y (D E U a W -O > E m m m0 m .° Y CO U m U O -O E (D m o a `m m m >> m> m o d > m m `m = a > mK a; m U= (D a mo c m � v m d m m mm a m m o p` a 0 o m a >> m n o m m .. m> Y K p` 0 3 m m a 0 m m m N m M m0 m0 0 O m p O) m0 - Ta Ix .1a v mo _ m w —° o m m c m m m :n a :n a0 m° ti .� kf a1 d' m 0 0 3 a7 w N O m m d m C m m (a N N 'C C m�'O >� E� O dY J C N O O.N C- C m��- CD N(O >� C CCU o. (O i %s4i m C o m m m r m t M O m 0 '- O �_ ^ m O m G O m O m 0 ^ m m (n m m m (n I >a0 W 0D 2 U¢� U(n U�C9a_(n U >n. C77U >C9 »¢_ a' O i 'O -� Of o m v m m a) o m m o of 3 m -o S �o o � n a) E m U m N '0 -O p m Y mo N 0 N m m N O 'O a) a) p m O d (0 m 0 12 (L > c m O m O d m D o m > m= a >> D! m Q: > > a mo c m d a m m a: m o K m m 000 a of "YavC7� o O oommm d� m m��Um > m0 0 o c a( oB � 0 N O m m 0 C al m a O Ya 0 a Q� N .m. t o m m m m a a O E c mO 'v > '> a Y o c— o D. (n c E C o—° c E a m (n > c c o. E> a C7wo�Om >j¢�Ui N M R `-- M 0 O r r M N M c 0 M M r 0 0 0 M M M M O MIT M � 0 O T T r M M M N r r 0,0 0 V' N N M O MOM 0 N M O M M M O M M M v M It I�t N O r N O M 0 �0 "r M N M r M l0 M 0 �0 � M M N t0 M M M M M 0 r N a"t N M r r r M a ON N .� N N N N N •' � � �� � M d'MO V r u1OMM rM NOJMN r M VIOOr �N V O MNO V i0 MMN ry M O a— M— M O M O co, r rMMu7 V'r0 M V V N M M OM M M,r—M N O M—M 1 QOM M M N M M M N `-- = � .- .- = a- r M V M O v r �O O M M r M N m N N r M �0 O O r V N V O M N MIT M +- �- M M N r ',t O M M O O) 0 M M M M .- N V r M M M M N O M r M O O M M t0 O M N 01 O N M MOO, —, � '"N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 W W W O m o O O W W W W O O m o O W W W W W o O m o O o m o W W U U U U U U U N N N N V N N N r M M M W O N -M M O O O O M O M r M 'r r r Q7 O M M O O r M M M M M M M M M M N M M M V V' � � •- N M M M M N N N � �- N � � M N � tq G @ N -C @ O) m 0 > 0 U m 0 CD - K 0 'O V V Y -O Co ' 0 0 @ cu @ > O@ O@ O d O C >@ N M m R' > n. @ L N N K m N .O � IL N -O @ K @ N C C 0 «� -O N N p. 0 0 N= N .+ @ M@ 0 N 0 j C Ol W e @@ j Z_ Z M -o m0 m a 0 m m in K m o m m E m> m m r M Q Q 0 oM0 W N V] N oNO O O_ >O N N C N V' V 0 N 7 T 'O N E C ) 'O Y� m C> > N U�OU) �Qi��in 0 U U U W 0UiUUZU� via C9 E >aC���tto :30 U0. C9 a .o `> N N T O > > T @ @ O O 0 'O @ U 0 0 0 @ > O @@ w a L L N N @ K @ W W @ J N @ N N Z 0 0 (� m rn U) a@i m rn x c a� o o c0 m 0 Co a) 0 C� 0 U) mm- -o o K W E >m K_r _,. -.ep @ @.n @vM C m MG Q N 0 N h V N O O _0 N 'O ?i U S. V 0@ O O C C T N U V W w N i0 N 0 3 O @ o- v @ c c a E c c- 0 @@ a �n a ._ c 0- U 7 J (D 7 U U d K 7 U i U U U i U O. > a E E> a C0J z m J U C9 Cl) Q S Q U' C9 Z M m cu m 0 0 0 0 2'2 U U U U U > > > 0 0 0 0 0 N N v E E E E' 3 va-OaW - - v - v- 0 m m m m m m m m mmmm .— @ @ @ @ o 0 0 0.0 >> 0 0 0 0 0 0 = M 2 2@ m m K N @ R� 0' d' K d' > N N 0 01 O O C C C C C ` N `- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0@ N @ @@@@ V@ "O m m m m@ m m 0 0 0 0 0 @ Y v v v v a' �' 0 UCi N N m m m O O O O dl m 0 M CI m m T 3 E @ N@ 0 O 'O 'a C C C N N N NNN N M CD � � � - E J J J J J _ J _ I J Z z U O (: a 'n. a a 'a � � � � � � � <n in in � � � � 0 M r M M — N M '7 0 M co N M I 0 M r M M O M a .- N M V 0 M st I�t It at '7 V' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M r I� r r r r r r r M M M M M M M h h N 7� h N V1 N h 7 N Y7 N IO M O m O N N N M O M M � O ONi O- m N m IMO m Ohi N N h INO N N OMl V O N N r N N W N M N I IhO 7 N N h N N N m O N N ONO N m m N N N N V ID N m h h u1 h h N N M N M N - , N N N N N M N N N N N N V m co V M O h O M M N m N t0 V LL h 0 O O V V N N N O M N d' It M N N N m 0 0 IO IO N N IO h ' N N V' IF N N N 0 IO O N M '7 d' r' �- M 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 M M 0 0 0 0 N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V O O h h N h V h N N m 0 O l0 N N O m It V h N M V N K h V <T dh N N —N N N N M N N N N N U U W W W W W W U U U W W W W W W W W W W o W o W W o o D O Q o h h N IO O O O h 1� h O N h V IO h N NNN m N. 7 O h IO If1 O N C N M m O O m a m ° O U E-° O K >> �° Y� E> °m m `m Y -O -o �0 > >E (a N > J m >` K m C 'O 'O m C 'O w w N n m m m FL m O O- C m m'0 m m > LL Ia J J m C N N j d o° mm O U m JOa � Y��d'i�¢ W a � mm w> Q m mm Nro N 'O m �O m C N N m° '° Q. C N 'm0 ,a V O N N 'p�L.. 7 m 2).(D a) m wN U`°O¢Ri'F -U in U) E >CJJ a(n UC7 U(7�7¢�U�� 7 w wU m 0 K Y � �° E v -o m 3 O a L v �` m v ° o -O -o m> C m° m N m m N m m C > m m m m> CJ > "O = J D J N K O= K L V m C '�>-. C w J IO/1 a T m _N O �? m W N m Y ° J O ..>. m m m 0 N p 0 l0 > m J c O m o o N m m C m° m CO ° U m L N 6 0 O y N a a' m L d N t L U C 10 N Y U V y° ? C •°-? N m° w m N N "O C >. = V d Ol m .rn C E w m • =� li C°JO Q w Ec UNN��i E >c9 'a in U(D m(D Q �°M §> E§ 0 a v 70 v ° m m m m L L L L L L L L L L a' a' a a' L > in in N N N N N N NrCCr C'C'C'C vC (U m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0> L L L L O J� W W W W W W W W W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z .0 I°a N N N >> a m 0 —oma moc ° o 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm c m m m m a a m o ru hF- 1- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- f`F- F- F- F-F-F- w == �' - -4. of m mNmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm° `m m N N - '- '- '- '- -- .- E v -° v -° m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm =C� —oc UU F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F - » » » O C7 d COLLIER COUNTY CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - GIS PRINT -OUTS Identify Results FIELD NAME VALUE Road Name Golden Gate Boulevard Remaining Peak Hour/Peak Direction 823 T- -s S. rent From Collier Boulevard Segment To Wilson Boulevard Page I of 1 ,...__u_c___n: _____.__.a_._ A /11 /7MC ITE TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK - FIGURE 5.5 SHOPPING CENTER PASS- BY EQUATION DIM - a m m i a _a F- m N -r N t a m m 4 I a Figure 5.5 Shopping Center (820) Average Pass -By Trip Percentage vs: 1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, P.m. Peak Period Number of Studies: 100 Average 1,000 Sq, Feet GLA: 329 120 110 100 96 60 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 Soo X =1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Pitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = -D.291 Ln(X) + 5.001 900 1000 1100 1200 R2 = 0.37 Trip Generation Handbook Chapter 5 ■ ITE 43 F- I a Figure 5.5 Shopping Center (820) Average Pass -By Trip Percentage vs: 1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, P.m. Peak Period Number of Studies: 100 Average 1,000 Sq, Feet GLA: 329 120 110 100 96 60 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 Soo X =1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area X Actual Data Points Pitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = -D.291 Ln(X) + 5.001 900 1000 1100 1200 R2 = 0.37 Trip Generation Handbook Chapter 5 ■ ITE 43 HCS2000 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RIGHT -IN /RIGHT -OUT @ GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD Two -Way Stop Control TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Page I of I [Analyst RLP Intersection Golden Gate @ Rt In/Rt Out 4 enc /Co. Metro Transportation Group Project Description F0503.19 -10 - Golden Gate Blvd @ SW 1st St CPD urisdiction Collier County )ate Performed 61712005 nal sis Year Buildout ItAnalysis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description F0503.19 -10 - Golden Gate Blvd @ SW 1st St CPD East/West Street: Golden Gate Boulevard North /South Street: Right-in/Right out Intersection Orientation: East -West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 0 1538 25 0 1548 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 1618 26 0 1629 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 _ 0 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street. Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume (veh /h ) 0 0 10 0 0 0 eak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 0 10 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Control Dela , Queue Len "th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R Volume, v (vph) 10 Capacity, cm (vph) 328 /c ratio 0.03 Queue length (95 %) 0.09 Control Delay (s /veh) 16.3 LOS C proach delay (s /veh) 16.3 pproach LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved file,//C-\Dnnnments and Settinvq \rin \Local Settinria \Temp \u2kCA.tmn Version 4.1 d 6/7/2005 Two -Way Stop Control General Information TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Page 1 of 1 [Analyst LP I ntersection lGoiden Gate @ Rt In/Rt Out ency /Co. IMetro Transportation Group urisdiction lCollier County fate Performed 161712005 nalysis Year IBuildout _ nal sis Time Period JPM Peak Hour me (veh /h) 0 F0503.19 -10 - Golden Gate Blvd ament 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R me (veh /h) 0 1548 65 0 1568 0 (-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 iy Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 1629 68 0 1650 0 ortion of heavy ;les, PHV 0 0 — ian type Raised curb ;hannelized? 0 0 s 0 2 1 0 2 0 Figuration T R T ream Signal 0 0 x Street Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R me veh/h) 0 0 35 0 0 0 (-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91� rly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 0 36 0 0 0 lortion of heavy des, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 :ent grade ( %) 0 0 >d approach N N Vage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R Volume, v (vph) 36 Capacity, cm (vph) 325 /c ratio 0.11 Queue length (95 %) 0.37 Control Delay (s /veh) 17.5 (LOS C proach delay (s /veh) — 17.5 pproach LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id iila• / /r'• \Tlnnnmantc onrl Sattinrte \rtn\T n,nl Cattinrte \Tama \n74r'F imn l/71?005 TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD @ SW 1st STREET CPD ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7th EDITION Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily (2 -way) Shopping Center LUC 820) Ln (T) = 0.60 Ln (X) + 2.29 Ln (T) = 0.66 Ln (X) + 3.40 Ln (T) = 0.65 Ln (X) + 5.83 T = Trips, X = 1,000 sq. ft. of GLA �j TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. July 28, 2006 Mr. Nick Casalanguida Collier County Transportation Planning Department 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FI. 34104 RE: Golden Gate Blvd @ 151 Street SW CPD Traffic Comments Response Dear Mr. Casalanguida: 12730 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE FORT MYERS, FL 33913 -8079 OFFICE 239.278.3090 FAX 239.278.1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN Based on your comments and our recent discussions, it was your opinion that the traffic distribution fornmdated for the above mentioned project required some adjustments. As a result, TR Transportation Consultants revised the distribution indicated within Figure 2 of the original TIS. The revised Figure 2 can be found attached at the end of this document for reference. Based on the revisions to Figure 2, revisions to other documents within the TIS were required. Most notably, the concurrency analysis was revised to indicate the most recent Collier County concurrency spreadsheet in addition to the new distribution. The revised Table IA can be found at the end of this document for reference. Figures 3 and 4 from the original TIS have been revised and attached to the end of this document as well. Figure 3 reflects the new site traffic assignment based on the updated traffic distribution. Figure 4 indicates the concurrency projections on Golden Gate Boulevard after the addition of the project related traffic. As can be seen from the revised Figure 4, all roadway links analyzed as a result of this report are shown to function with sufficient capacity upon the addition of the Golden Gate Boulevard @ I" Street SW CPD traffic. Therefore, no roadway link improvements are required as a result of this project. In accordance with the conclusions reached in the original analysis, it is likely that several turn lane improvements will be necessary when this development obtains its Site Development Plan (SDP). These turn lane requirements preliminarily include an eastbound right turn lane on Golden Gate Boulevard at the right-in/right-out site access, a westbound left turn lane on Golden Gate Boulevard at I" Street SW, and a southbound right turn lane on Wilson Boulevard at the site access. The specific turn lane improvements will be determined at the SDP phase for the proposed project. �j TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr Golden Gate Blvd Nick Casalanguida 1" Street SW CAD July 28, 2006 Page 2 If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert L. Price Senior Transportation Consultant Attachments , IMMOKALEE ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH 1 ROAD 0 5 w GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD � -40 %-► w J J O U PINE RIDGE ROAD, LEGEND 4-20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION J 0 m 20% Z O J 9 ♦30 %-► 100% 0 O �j TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Revised 7/27/06 I j CONSULTANTS, INC. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 2 N W E S N.T.S. U) ♦5(15) 10 (40) ♦ 15 (55) (45) 15 ♦ t* (10) - ♦ �'� GOLI (25) 10 p (45) 15 I� Log i o N 10 (75) i y 0 0 Of w D O a0 Z N O O J HRU (25) 5 J (40) 10 0 (4 5) 5 (20) 5 '4-000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS 4-10(30) j 10 (20) 0 N TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Revised 7/27/06 CONSULTANTS, INC. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 3 a Mom 0 �20 O IMMOKALEE ROAD T BEACH I ROAD 0 o: w J O m cr w J J O J PINE RIDGE ROAD' 832 (817) [767) 2.8% GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD 832 (820) [792) 1.770 LEGEND 000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER AM PROJECT TRAFFIC i [000] REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE REMAINING CAPACITY ON Revised 7/27/06 TRANSPORTATION COUNTY ROADWAY NETWORK CONSULTANTS, INC. GOLDEN GATE BLVD @ SW 1st St CPD Figure 4 $ � - \k $)! { /kc §!}t !!§§ ( }s ƒ/ \{\ \ \ /!. \fi{ |f { f )(f' \/\ (f§ m \} §§ )Gawp@) §\�w2 U) !§ - / / ° / /@B K § §§§r) w ® Rgra2 §\ Q U CL CC® wwIX w ka. !& �D 0 0 2 a. CL v ir $ g LU \ 0 0 co . § }} � \ \ 0it it a\\ r� � (( }j k) /} eR $ � - \k $)! { /kc §!}t !!§§ ( }s ƒ/ \{\ \ \ /!. \fi{ |f { f )(f' \/\ (f§ :) v D m K m Q y Y r0 O_ 'O U m Z p °c ~ U Z M C (n m c o c o N > J v D m > J U 1i O_ D U E a • o c a d LL 0 H U w Y C a) E w N p, M M M M m m ' 'y' O O) M m 1 10 ( (p - O O O O M M Y Y) ( (p M M m 0 0 0 Q O N . .- O O M M V V O O � �-- m M m m N N V V M M N N m m m 0 V V W W V V 0 0 1 1LO M M c co U N U) M M c N 10 O O ' 'V a Y C a) E w N p, M M M M m m ' 'y' O O) M m 1 10 ( (p - O O O O M M Y Y) ( (p M M m 0 0 0 Q O N . .- O O M M V V O O � �-- m M m m N N V V M M N N m m m 0 V V W W V V 0 0 1 1LO M M c co U N U) M M c N 10 O O ' 'V a al ( (0 1 10 M N ( (c0 1 100 4` • •- N N r r r r r r r N M M LU r r r J h h h h M M m m p p r r M O h h V V C CO W ' ' M O O m m N N h h h h 0 0 0 0 m m 0 (p N N M r r- ( (D O 0 M M M O OD M M ' 'R ( (p r r ( (p y N N N N N N N N N N N N r 0 0 O "�` N N 0 0 N N N N M M h h M M h h m m h h N y r N N N N N N N0 N N m m Y t tr h h M M QM N N 1 1N N N N N N N N O N N l h h h N M W W N N r r a r M M t to M M N N N O l0 1 100 h N M a00 r m N N 0 0) a F J O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' '- O O O O O O O O O O ' 'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M N N M M M V V m m M M 0 0 C Cl) M M M M N k kl' O O M M r r- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N � (O N ( M N OD �- � �-• r r y yr. N N N N N N R M N O O R 2 a ti OJ O O W W W W W W W W W W O O ❑ ❑ O O W W O O O O O O O O Z Z W W W W W W W W O O O O O O W W C C T M M M M M V V V V' W W W❑ O O W W TO M 7a aZ 7 �'b ks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) )0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N p Lo M M M M h 0 P M O O M M .j0 M M l l0 h h M M M M m m m m N N 0 0 0 a N N M M M M M M R R N N r r r r 0 Pj N N N N N N � �° ( h M M V M M C (V M M P P°') h Cl) a v Rti, a a Y Y m O m O > 3 ° b 01 :`s;+ m o m m m I Ir ° E > E m o m m b o;x Q U O N N > O 2 o K N 0 2 m a m O0° °' m= CO Y Y N °° E? lL m Ol m m N m al i i D V C 9 O O N m N O b m O ,:b. O i° O N m 7 m 4[C cam m ✓c, �� $mco .�K a M -0 0 -C9 (D ° .m v E °) a$ o w c 5 .`w o} g o �o w o m m c 0 rn O —Y�. m O R Y ❑ C- W, 0 ... m ) '7 a a. b _v O m 1 aca >a o:.. I w 3 m U m 10 'O v a) p m .?` Y m o M d > > 'o La m m o m o a of W m� v ° o o ° o m m` u d o a0i m rn M 00 N 0: O m m r r O T m !` N tf m (0 { m� Q 'O N 'O V at [} O i c «0 a) 'O (�0 x a) j c E> a (oJ 0 Y o O° a n c E n �) R m m m m m m m m m 2 3 0 0 0 0 a) O 'O 'O V 'O O; m m m m m Y Y Y Y P 70 >_ a m m m m m 'a a a o fL c c c c 1? Lu m m m m m m❑ E a) a) m y LL LL LL LL m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ac ) m 'r Er 0 O CD m O o °°° o w v❑ ❑ ❑O ❑U;(�c9 C9 c9 C9 c9 C7 c9C90 �-- N M V' 10 [U h 0 r MMMEEMEME m -- LIN T 46 S T 47 9 1 T 40 3 1 lip Iq I if 111M ii T 49 S i/1.�,�-,� T 50 S I T 513 1 T 62 8 1 T 53 8 ------------- cz 0 rl S of, 1 S Lt I S 31 1 s 31 1 1 9 03 1 s Ls 1 2 Z6 1 .d N"100 3,V0 al Ci lu j W6 3W Ni Nil typs 1 9 as 1 FUTURE LAND USE MAP MAP 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES AS AMENDED SECTION V.E.2: PUBLIC FACILITIES LOCATIONS - ENLARGEMENT LEGEND PUBLIC FACILITIES EXISTING PLANNED ROADS WATER TREATMENT PLANTS ■ EXISTING OR MODIFIED WATER RETENTION STRUCTURES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS ■ ICI SOLID WASTE FACILITIES PARKS ■ BOAT RAMPS ■ BOAT LANE; GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SHERIFF'S STATIONS AND ■ SUBSTATIONS JAILS �. LIBRARIES ■ fl EMERGENCY MEDICAL STATIONS ■ Ll FIRE STATIONS A 0 PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS AND ■ � HOSPITALS 0_J AIRPORTS ■ SCHOOLS ■ HISTORIC RESOURCES - -- COASTAL MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY SECTION V.E.2: PUBLIC FACILITIES LOCATIONS - ENLARGEMENT �-EE A ROAD (C.R. 846 m' E SECTION V.E.2: PUBLIC FACILITIES LOCATIONS - ENLARGEMENT { PUBLIC FACILITIES: 4. Service Providers SERVICE Schools Fire Protection Police Protection Emergency Medical Services PROVIDER The District School Board of Collier County Golden Gate Fire Department Collier County Sheriff Collier County Emergency Medical Services The proposed amendment is not expected to have a significant impact to the above service providers. Impacts are mitigated for schools, fire and emergency medical services through the payment of impact fees at the time of development. Proposed Expansion of the Wilson Boulevard / Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center 04 -I1 -05 WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXHIBIT I OTHER Firm Map Wellfields and Cones of Influence GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2005 CYCLE / CP- 2005 -2 I NATIONAL FLOOD NISMUCE PROGRAM !I FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP /0 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PANEL 450 OF 1125 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 120067 0450 D -K MAP REVISED: JUNE 3, 1986 `VIII Federal Emergency Management Agency I SECTION V.F.1 FIRM MAP ix This map Is for flood Insurance and flood plain management purposes; it dots not necessarily show all areas subject to flooding In the community of all planlmetric features outside Special Flood . Huard Areas. Certain areas not In Special Flood Huard Areas may be protected ,a by flood control structures. Boundaries of the floodways were computed at "on sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were baud on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Floodway widths In some areas may be too narrow to show to scale. Floodway, widths are provided In the Flood Insurance Study Report, Coastal bass flood elevations apply only landward of the shoreline. Elevation reference marks are descrlbed in the Flood insurance Study Report. For adjoining map panels see separately printed Map Index MAP REPOSITORY Planning Building and Zoning Department Government Complex 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida • INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: SEPTEMBER 14, 1878 1 FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1878 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS: Map revised October 1, 1983 to incorporate approximate boundaries of designated undeveloped coastal barriers. Map revised December 18, 1984 for cartographic modifications. Map revised June 3, 1986 to change zone designations, base flood elevations, and special flood hazard areas reflecting wave action effects, to revise corporate limits, to add roads and road names, and to reflect new FEMA title block. To detarietIm If flood Insurance Is availabk, contact an Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 6386620. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 2000 O 2000 FEET SECTION V.F.1 .FIRM MAP LEGEND _SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100 -YEAR FLOOD ZONE Ne bar flood olnadons dowminod. ZONE AE 8sr flood olovadens dowmlmd. ZONE AH Flood dopNS of 1 l0 3 foot (."ally woas of pondina): bar flood oleraaom dotormitrd. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 fort (uwally si o flow on dopin/ wraln); +wrap dopths dowminod. For aroas of alluvial I" flood. Ina, vo104ties aim dowmbrd. ZONE A99 To be protoetod from 100year flood by Fodond flood protoNon systom under sonmssetbn; no bar olorationa detorminM. ZONE V Ceadal flood with wlodty hoard (wavo "on); no bar flood olsradons dow. minod. ZONE VE Cound flood with velocity board (wave -don); bass flood olevatlons dotormhrd. - FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE -OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500 -year flood; areas of 100 -year flood with average depths Of less than I foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100, Year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500 - year flood plain. ZONE D Areas In which flood hazards are undetermined. Flood Boundary —� Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary © Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations within Special Flood Huard Zones. 513 Base Flood Elevation Line; Ele- vation In Feet* Cross Section Line (EL 987) Base Flood Elevation In Feet Where Uniform Within Zone* RM7x Elevation Reference Mark *Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SECTION V.F.1 FIRM MAP COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS N IMMOKALEE Air WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT WELLFIELOS SECTION V.F.2: N WELLHEADS LOCATION MAP CR 846 el CR 846 ORANGETREE WELLFIELD CR 858 CR 846 'a EAST GOLD� GATE Lo COASTAL G.G. BLVD an RIDGE _ WELLFIELD PINE COWER RIDGE CDUNTY UTILITIES WELLFIELD m a N G P WY SUBJECT pgnppgTy 175 R 84 FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT In PLANT WELLFIELD rn QQ J m W Q (J7 S A� rn (n EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD o� U NUS 4) m- AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2005 Ord. N9. 200 3-44 PREPAM BM ORAPNIC6 AND TECHNWAL SUPPORT SECIMN CONMR9TY DEIALOPIIP(T AND ENYMMAENTAL SEAWCES DM9aN SDIAICC COLDER ODUNTY PDLLUTNRI C0N1 AIM �MN DEPT. DATE: 9/2005 EYE: Y M12 -200 !)M WILSON BOULEVARD and GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER EXPANSION EXHIBIT J SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Copy of Check for Filing Fee Copy of Deed Letter of Authorization GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APRIL 2005 '°�° 765841574 MICHAEL CORDER 04/15/2005 Purchaser $16,450.00 SIXTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS a Pay to the order of: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF 9 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A.mSbppt i 9 Purchased For yx luueo Oy Irtteg,aletl Payment Systems Inc., Englew000, Coloretlo Authorize Y To CNCank, N.A., Sufialo, NY I 1111 104286ii• i:0220008681: 680076584i5747ii' SECTION V.6.1 FILING FEE IJ a„ Bank ignature a3 - -- nuvn -) o-ri - rage 4a/ T donmMM4 p,.pa,N by DOOQ,N A. MOM Beaehfroet Title Iuuranos, Inc. 1000 Tanlaai Trail North, auita 401 xaplea, Florida 34302 rr.drDN.rb.r.37169480000 6 37169440008 Onmrdl TIN: Onrw R TIN: * ** 3472749 OR: 3641 PG: 0482 13cm 10 0111CIM 000107 of Count Mm' IL 00 /13 /1000 at 11:1111 oncr 1. n0a, COO WO 309001.00 Ile m 10.00 W.-Il 2003.00 Rota: IIIMIM nm loll 1 TODII TI 1 111 W111 TL 30102 5011 Warranty Deed Thh Indenture, Mxkthis 10th dayof September , 2004 A.D. Samuel T. Dhanraj and D. Blaine Dhaeraj, husband and wile or 0e Co,* or Collier Michael A. Corder Between S" of Florida , grantors, wd wbor .ddr. a: 3821 3rd Avenue, S.W. , Naples, FL 34117 a ew covey of Collier , n.r of Florida , grantee, Witsesseth ena.ORAWT0R3.fr adromWw&d=WM.amof -------------------- - - --TM DOLLARS (0110)----------------- - - - - -- DoueRS, W ear amd eM wdmN..a.tldsatina w OR AMOtu to kW wid by GRAMS, W w.0 wie-r b baby .rYeowl,DOU bn. prrd. b.,poW no rN W dr rW GRAMM eW ORAHters b.b., wears...d ralpa frmw, eo ddb * ercaad W4 riaea 1y tmdbdy R.d.camyof Collier See of Florida Ww. .. The North 1/2 of Tract 126, OOiLUDI Un ESTATBS, UNIT NO, 12, accordicg to the plat thereof, recorded in plat Book 4, Pages 10S and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND The South 1/2 of Tract 126, OOLUAI OATH ZSTATItS, MIT NO. 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations cocoon to the subdivision and taxes for the current year and subsequent yeas. rd dr ty.rea M W-bY MY ,.r,ad d- dW b ..ld WA ad WM d.fmd Ow . rLLm bwid d.o of W pea.m wbo . In Whew Whercot a. ba.. beUMM r Rb.b bmb d sal. W day W y M above wNla Slgsad mad ek i oe�er//gamoe . (Sul) ignatnTo Witness /1 Samuel T. Dhanraj print name: V --T"na A&sml.— P.O. Adaaa: I3N 31M SbuLi Nap W, FL 34117 Y//1 ;A,",4Cad �D • �y (see) Signature Witness Y2 D. Slaine Dhanraj print name: 0e61r.. f P. O. Addrtss: l3M 3" 3r 3.W., N.Wa 31117 STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier 7W aa.peat Wo,mee . rdmv.WW b.k,o m< mh /O� ey .I September , 2004 by Samsel T. Dhanraj and D. Blaine ahaaraj, husband and wife wbo anp mmw, bm Wm<m woo baw pmwW Uk_20Ut�44 r Wmticael... � - rage 1 of 1 http:// www. collierappraiser .com/viewer/Image.asp? 2/16/2005 This Intrumeu, prepared by: Douglas A. Wood Beachfront Title Insurance, Inc. 1000 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 401 Naples, FL 34102 Parcel ID Number: 37169560108 Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this 26th day of Martin Rovan, a single man May ,2005 AD Of the County or Collier Michael Corder I Slue of Florida , grantor, and Whoic add,,, is of the County of Collier Slate or Florida , grantee, Witnesseth Nat the GRANTOR, for and in comidention ofNc sum of e---- -TEN DOLLARS good and valuable consideration ,o GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereb DOLLARS, Wanted, bargained and sold la the said GRANTEE and GRANTEE's heirs. aacCE"nm and "signs forever, the following described fare, n h" lying and being in the Counryor Collier siruam, Sum of Florida to wit. North 150' o£ Tract 126, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Pages 105 and 106, of Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations common to the subdivision and taxes for the current year and subsequent years. and the grantor does hereby Polly warrant the till- in said land, and will defend the same, again, lawful claims of ell persona whomsoever In Witnes reof, the grit r has hereunto set his hand and seal the doe and Signed, e d Y Ynr Or about wrinen our presence: Signature itness (Seal) print name: ST4 Smith r n Rov n P.O. ddresa: I10 Itl $hest. s. W„ Naples, FL 34117 Signature Witness ff2 print name: STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier The foregoing iuoumdm w" acknowledged before me this 26th day of May Martin Rovan, a single man ,2005 by he is personally known m me or he has produced his YL u idenlificuion. e`f 3usanaM.3mkh P to N e: �tvtSih- n e CCp�o.n,arlaalon t DD36WM lotary Public `°Ptm October 27. 2005 B1014@03 My Commigion Expirn'. ,r aww,.r rn.s„e„sar troaa "ae t+m cwr.uy er o a•gry srn.nu. b,c. rem ( ...) 4, uu rwn. rtu,n I (NOUEN) AFFIDAVIT STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Martin Rovan, a single man who being by me duly sworn, on oath, deposes and rays: I. That hem_ ire owners) ofthe following described ry , ro er P P • to wit: North 150' of Tract 126, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 105 and 106, of 1. That the above described property is free and clear of all liens, loxes, encumbrances and claims of every kind, nature and description whatsoever, except for mortgage or mortgages, if any, described in the deed given between the parties named herein, and except for real estate and personal property lazes for the year 3. That within the past 90 days there have been no improvements, alterations, or reeppalirs to the above described property for which the costs thereof remain unpaid, and that within the pas, 90 days there have been no claims for labor or material furnished for repairing or improving the same, which remain unpaid, except the following: NONE 4. Thai !here are no mechanic's, materialmen's, or laborer's liens against the above described property. 5. That the personal property contained in the buildings on said property, or on the said premises, and which, if any, is being sold to the purchasers) mentioned below, is also free and clear of all fte demands whatsoever. nr, encumbrances, claims and 6. That afant(s), in the operation of said building and property, complied in all respects with the SALES TAX LAW of the Slate of Florida. That there are no violations of Municipal Ordinances pertaining to the above described property. Thai this affidavit is made for the purpose of inducing Michael Corder t opurchosesaidproperryfromafant (s): Martin Rovan, a single man 9. Aflam(s) agrees) that in the event the current real estate and personal property taxes vary to amount from the figures used In making the proration had In closing the transfer and conveyance of the above described property to said purchasers) then a new proration and a correct and proper adjustment will be made upon demand. 10. Thar no judgment or decree has been entered in any court of this state or the United States against said affrant(s), and which remains unsatisfied. I . Afant(s) further state that they are each familiar with the nature of an oath; and with the penalties as pro- vided by the laws of the State aforesaid for falsely swearing to statements made in an instrument of this nature. Af- ant(s) further cert6(y that they have read, or have heard read !o them, the full f cts of (his o vii, and understand Its COn!¢Y!. rt' Rovan SEAL) STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier Sworn to and subscribed bcfom me this Martin Rovan, a single man 26th a,y or May ,2005 by he is pcnonally known to me er he hu produxd his It^ u identificationSusana M. Smith Commlulon i D098S89S ' ted ante : SuSmith E,PksaOctober 27 2008 ary Public 81014 @03 „ suwsgM YVralrm 18 My Commission Expire' I+w aw,uW er o oupnr svuun.. Im.. u,n Irul lbsssn Po,m ilnff.l LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that they are the fee simple title holders and owners of record of property located on the Southeast Corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and P Street SW and legally described as follows: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" The property described herein is the subject of an application for a Growth Management Plan Amendment and subsequent development orders within Collier County. We hereby designate Planning Development Incorporated /Michael R. Fernandez. AICP as the legal representative of the property as such, this individual is authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop this site. This authority includes but is not limited to the hiring and authorizing of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain development permits from Collier County, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), TECO, Sprint, Time Warner and Comcast. STATE OF 7 COUNTYOF Cokk•« Swom to (or affirmed) and before me thi Michael Corder, who i ersonally known to or who identification. - Kelly Foote Commission # DD34045; Erpns: JULY 22.2K8 4�� Michael Corder Property Owner 11' day of Dl � \ 2005 by has produced as Notary Public My Commission Expires: typed, printed or stamped Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The North % of Tract 124, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 12, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND The South '/2 of "I'ract 124, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AND The North 150' of Tract 126, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 12, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Pages 105 and 106, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Agenda Item 4F Coi [die -r Co- rrvity STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: March 5, 2007 RE: PETITION CP- 2005 -6, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT /APPLICANTS Agent: Richard Yovanovich Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Applicants /: Lisa Merritt, Chair Owners The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 and Paul Dykes, Len Coley, and Paul Bellofutto, Trustees Parkway Community Church of God 5975 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 I. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, containing 16.3± acres, is located in Golden Gate Estates on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, between the 1 -75 Interchange and Santa Barbara Boulevard, Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, and is located within the Golden Gate Planning Community. E N GU. N ET GOLDEN GATE P4RKW.AY Agenda Item 4F II. REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) text and Future Land Use Map by: Amending Policy 1.1.2 of the Estates - Mixed Use District to add the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; 2. Amending the Estates - Mixed Use District, Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions section, to allow the subject request - expansion of the existing conditional uses and new development of institutional and related uses on the adjacent five (5) acre tract, east of the existing conditional uses; 3. Amending the Estates — Mixed Use District to add the proposed Subdistrict; and 4. Creating a new Future Land Use Map series map depicting this new Subdistrict, amending the Future Land Use Map to add this new Subdistrict. The proposed change to Policy 1. 1.2 and the proposed Subdistrict text is as follows: Policy 1.1.2: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use District and Subdistricts for: ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT h. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict [new text, page 51 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION a. Estates — Mixed Use District 8. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict [new text, page 45] Uolgen Uate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of well - planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: a. Churches and other places of worship. b. Group care facilities (Categories I and II) c. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities d. Essential services as set forth in LDC Section 2.01.03. e. Private Schools. f. Day care centers. Agenda Item 4F district. a. Libraries b. Government offices. c. Medical offices associated with group care facilities. d. Civic and cultural facilities. The proposed change to the Estates — Mixed Use District, Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provision section is as follows: 5) Conditional Uses Subdistrict b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: [revised text, page 421 • Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. III. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioners are requesting approval to expand the existing conditional uses — mental health facility and church — and to develop new institutional uses and related uses on the adjacent 5± acre tract (Tract 66, Unit 30, GGE), east of the existing conditional uses. IV. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: • The proposal consists of four tracts; zoned E, Estates, with a Corridor Management Overlay (CMO), and designated Estates - Residential Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. • Tracts 43 & 50 are developed with a Conditional Use for the David Lawrence Center. • Tract 59 is developed with a Conditional Use for the Parkway Community Church of God. • Tract 66 is undeveloped and located east of the approved Conditional Uses. • The project site is located on Golden Gate Parkway, an arterial roadway. • Two access drives are provided for each facility onto Golden Gate Parkway. Surrounding Land Uses: • North: Developed, single - family homes; zoned E, Estates; and designated Estates — Residential Subdistrict • South: Across Golden Gate Parkway, developed, single - family homes and a church; zoned E, Estates; and designated Estates — Residential Subdistrict • East: Undeveloped; zoned E, Estates; and designated Estates — Residential Subdistrict Agenda Item 4F • West: Undeveloped; zoned E, Estates; and designated Estates — Residential Subdistrict V. STAFF ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan Amendment data and analysis requirement Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue... the Department will review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the consistency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. Background and Considerations: • Existing Provisional Use (PU) /Conditional Use (CU) approvals for the David Lawrence facility and Parkway Community Church of God : The David Lawrence Center has been operating in Collier County since 1969, according to the agent. The Center's present location along Golden Gate Parkway was approved by Provisional Use in 1977. Subsequent provisional /conditional use approvals were granted in 1985, 1986, and 1998 to allow for additional uses and facility expansion onto adjacent Estates designated properties. The Parkway Community Church of God was approved by Provisional Use in 1984. • Number of PU /CUs on the Parkway from Livingston Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard: There are approximately 15 active provisional /conditional uses along the Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Approximately one -third of the approved conditional uses are churches and the remaining two- thirds are community facility uses, Agenda Item 4F such as fraternal organizations, Bridge club, and daycare /school facilities. Additionally there are two non - conforming use changes, a bingo hall and a physical fitness center. Golden Gate Area Master Plan — Locational criteria limiting commercial and conditional use development in the Estates designation were established with the adoption of the GGAMP in the GMP in 1991: GGAMP — 1991 • Commercial development was limited to Estates Neighborhood Centers, site - specific commercial subdistricts, and existing commercially zoned lands. • Conditional use development, except essential services, was limited to Estates Neighborhood Centers, infill development on Golden Gate Parkway and on the west side of C.R. 951, and transitional areas — adjacent to certain non - residential uses. GGAMP — Present Commercial development is limited to Neighborhood Centers, site - specific commercial subdistricts, and existing commercially zoned properties. • Conditional use development, except essential services, is limited to Estates Neighborhood Centers, infill development on the west side of C.R. 951, transitional areas — adjacent to certain non - residential uses or adjacent to Neighborhood Centers, and two site specific locations — one on the west side of C.R. 951 and one on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway. • 1 -75 Interchange and surrounding land uses: Resulting from the State's approval to fund and construct the 1 -75 Interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Resolution 2001 -56 establishing an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee to provide recommendations on the appearance and landscaping of the interchange. The Committee was specifically tasked with creating an `overlay' district for the interchange to: 1) minimize impacts to property owners; 2) preserve the residential character of the area; and 3) establish landscaping provisions consistent with creating a "gateway" into Naples and Golden Gate. • GGAMP Re -study Committee - GGAMP Policy 5.2.3 and revisions to the Estates, Conditional Uses Subdistrict: The GGAMP Re -study Committee was formed, in part, to study the land use needs of the Golden Gate Community, such as commercial, community facility and institutional uses. County staff worked with the Committee to identify appropriate areas to locate new commercial development and conditional uses within the Estates and Golden Gate City. Committee recommendations to the BCC included added provisions for conditional use development, expansion and creation of Neighborhood Centers within the Estates, and the expansion and creation of commercial /mixed -use subdistricts within Golden Gate City. The Re -study Committee also identified areas that were inappropriate for new commercial and conditional use development. One such area identified by the Committee was the Golden Gate Parkway corridor, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. In Agenda Item 4F 2003, the Re -study Committee met with "I -75 /Golden Gate Parkway" Ad hoc Committee members to discuss desired land uses for the area surrounding the interchange. As a result, the Re -study Committee recommended to the BCC provisions that would prohibit new commercial and conditional use development along Golden Gate Parkway in the Estates. Committee recommendations for expanded commercial and conditional use opportunities and the restriction of these uses in certain areas governed by the Master Plan were adopted by the BCC in 2003 and 2004, as part of the Phased Re -study Amendments to the GGAMP. • Justification for the proposed amendment, as provided by the applicant/agent (refer to Exhibit Q and pages 6 -8 of the application) : Justification for the proposed Plan change is limited to compatibility, site's proximate location to a multi -lane arterial roadway, and right -of -way acquisition by the State and Collier County for roadway construction and expansion. • Compatibility of proposed expansion of existing facilities and new uses with existing surrounding land uses: The agent states that the uses proposed and the expansion of the existing facilities are compatible with surrounding land uses, due to past Conditional Use approvals granted by Collier County. Additionally, the agent describes the proposed new uses as "active during the day, but are frequently non - intrusive in the evening and at night." • Proposed Subdistrict's proximity to Golden Gate Parkway, an arterial roadway: The agent states that the proposed new uses might benefit from better roadway access. • Right -of -way acquisition: The FDOT and Collier County acquired acreage from the subject properties for the Parkway expansion and the associated construction of the 1 -75 Interchange. The agent for the David Lawrence Center states that the lost acreage limits the development on the existing project acreage because the native vegetation retention standards and stormwater management requirements of the County's Land Development Code can not be met on site. The table below identifies the acreage acquired for roadway construction. G.G. Estates Unit 30 FDOT R.O.W. (acres) County R.O.W. Easement acres Total acres Tract 43 (David Lawrence Center) 1.02 0 1.02 Tract 50 (David Lawrence Center) 1.18 0 1.18 Tract 59 (Parkway church) 0.21 0.27 0.48 Tract 66 (Vacant - owned by D.L. Center) 0 0.25 0.25 TOTAL 2.41 0.52 2.93 VI. Environmental Impacts: The environmental report submitted by Wilson Miller with this petition, dated April 2005 and supplemented in June 2006, indicates the following: Agenda Item 4F • The site contains pine flatwoods, with palmetto and graminoid understory and exotics. The soil found on site is listed as Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. • The subject site does not exhibit wetland characteristics. There are no signs of standing water, no hydric soil indicators and no living cypress knees. • The listed species survey conducted on site concluded that there were no signs of Florida panther or black bear inhabiting or utilizing the site. Additionally, no signs of Big Cypress fox squirrel and gopher tortoise were documented utilizing or inhabiting the site. • Listed plant species observed on site were the common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), twisted air plant (Tillandsia flexuosa), and giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata). These plants are listed by the Florida Dept. of Agriculture as endangered and are not listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Environmental Specialists with the Collier County Environmental Services reviewed the environmental report and provided the following comments: The establishment of the Subdistrict will allow for the recovery of the native vegetation lost on site due to land acquisition for the 1 -75 Interchange and the roadway expansion of Golden Gate Parkway. • The potential establishment of a preserve in a larger and more contiguous area (on the adjacent 5 -acre site) furthers the Policies and Objectives of the Coastal Conservation and Management Element of the GMP. Historical and Archeological Impacts: • The Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. However, the Florida Dept. of State, Division of Historical Resources, cautions property owners that sites may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. VII.Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Analysis and Impacts: • Traffic Capacity: The subject acreage is directly adjacent to the segment of Golden Gate Parkway identified in the 2006 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) from 1 -75 to Santa Barbara, as having an adopted Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard of "E." In 2006, the peak hour capacity of the facility (with 6- lanes) was rated at 3,730 with a current volume of 1,843, yielding an operating LOS of "C." • Traffic Impacts and Circulation Analysis: Absent this request to change to the GMP, two single - family homes could be developed on the adjacent 5 -acre Tract (Tract 66). These homes would generate approximately two p.m. peak hour trips on the adjacent roadway. Conversely, assuming an approximate 20,000 square foot expansion of the David Lawrence Center, the ITE Trip Generation Handbook indicates that approximately 35 p.m. peak hour trips would be generated for a LU# 715 Single Use Tenant Bldg. Assuming a 60/40 split of the trips, in a west/east direction, the resulting p.m. peak hour traffic impact of the additional floor area described above would be considered de minimis, and would have no impact on the operational LOS of Golden Gate Parkway. Agenda Item 4F No special access management considerations are being requested as part of this Plan amendment. This amendment does not preclude the potential for cross - access agreements which would facilitate the sharing of existing or future access points, thus improving access and site circulation. Pursuant to the Land Development Code, access management issues shall be addressed at subsequent Site Development Plan application. • Consistency with the GMP: The project is not consistent with the policies in the Comprehensive Plan that prohibit new conditional use development along Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. Additionally, a commitment was made by the County to the Florida Department of Transportation in consideration of the approval and construction of the 1 -75 Interchange to keep the Golden Gate Parkway corridor "green" and not allow the proliferation of commercial and conditional uses. VIII. Public Facilities Impacts: • Water and Wastewater: The existing and proposed expansion and proposed new uses will be served by Florida Government Utility Authority. The agent has requested an availability of service letter /determination from the provider, but no response from the Utility Authority has been received to date. • Solid Waste: The service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The 2005 AUIR identifies that the County has sufficient landfill capacity up to the year 2027 for the required lined cell capacity. The project is projected to be built -out in 2008. • Drainage: The Subdistrict is located in Flood Zone X. According to the agent, there are no known drainage problems associated with the subject properties and future development will comply with the SFWMD and /or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of storm water events by both on -site and off -site improvements. • Schools, Libraries, Parks and Recreational Facilities: The application does not propose an increase in residential density; therefore, no additional demand for services is anticipated. • EMS, Fire, Police and County Jail: The subject site is located within the East Naples Fire District. The nearest fire station, EMS services, and police substation are available on Golden Gate Parkway, approximately two miles to the east in Golden Gate City. Expansion of the existing uses and proposed new uses are anticipated to have minimal impacts on these safety services. IX. Appropriateness of Change: The Golden Gate Estates community continues to experience rapid growth much like the Coastal Urban designated areas in Collier County. With increased population comes the need/demand to construct and expand roadways to move traffic, provide infrastructure to accommodate new residential units, and provide commercial, community facilities and institutional opportunities, etc. to serve the expanding population. Increasingly, Estates - designated properties located west of Collier Boulevard along collector and arterial roadways are being targeted for urban type development — higher densities, commercial services, community and institutional facilities, etc. In recent years, the County has 8 Agenda Item 4F experienced an influx in the number of Growth Management Plan Amendment requests to change the designation of properties from Estates Residential Subdistrict to site - specific commercial subdistricts. As the County continues to grow, local government must be responsive to the community's needs while balancing the undesired impacts caused by growth. As an example, the 1 -75 Interchange at Golden Gate Parkway was, in part, approved and is being constructed to alleviate traffic congestion at other interchanges in the County. The resulting impacts from the approval - noise, increased traffic volumes, right -of -way acquisition, and potential commercialization of Golden Gate Parkway - was realized immediately by surrounding residents. Elected officials responded by establishing a committee to provide recommendations on the appearance and landscaping of the interchange with the intent of preserving the residential character of the area and minimizing impacts to property owners. Additionally, county staff worked with the community via the GGAMP Re -study Committee to recommend provisions be added to the Plan to prohibit the approval of any new commercial zoning and conditional uses along the Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The Board of County Commissioners approved these prohibitions, in 2004. Although these prohibitive provisions exist in the GGAMP, staff acknowledges it would be appropriate to consider any changes in conditions that have occurred since 2004 that would warrant a modification of, or exception to, Policy 5.2.3 and /or the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Estates — Mixed Use District. However, staff is unaware of any such changed conditions. At the time of adoption of these provisions, plans for the future 6- laning of Golden Gate Parkway, the future 6- laning of Livingston Road, and construction of the 1 -75 interchange were all known. X. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) NOTES: The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held on November 13, 2006, after the applicant/agent duly noticed and advertised the meeting, as required by the Collier County Land Development Code. Approximately 35 people attended the NIM, held at the Parkway Community Church of God, located at 5975 Golden Gate Parkway. The following is a synopsis of the meeting: Mr. Rich Yovanovich (Agent) introduced the applicants and their representatives and gave an overview of the Growth Management Plan Amendment process. Mr. David Schimmel of the David Lawrence Center explained the request for the amendment is to continue operation of the existing facility, as well as, allow future improvements to the site. The existing Parkway Community Church of God is co- applicant and is requesting the same. Of those who spoke, many had questions relative to the property affected by the proposed amendment. The agent(s) explained the amendment only referred to the subject four, five -acre parcels. Mr. Schimmel presented a history of the David Lawrence Center and described an annual average patient activity within the facility. He also stated that the vacant parcel to the east of the facility may be used for water management, vegetation requirements, and /or more facilities in the future. He said that any additional building would have a 35 -foot height limitation, as required by the GGAMP. Agenda Item 4F Neighboring properties owners stated that the construction of the 1 -75 overpass at G.G. Parkway has impacted their property and they had questions regarding property conversions to commercial zoning. Mr. David Weeks explained the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning process. No one spoke in opposition or in favor of the petition. [Synopsis prepared by L. Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator and modified by M. Mosca, Principal Planner] XI. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS: • The proposed subdistrict is not consistent with the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions section of the GGAMP, which prohibits new conditional uses on properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. • The application and support documentation for the proposed amendment does not address changed conditions that would justify or support an exception or change to the adopted Subdistrict in the GGAMP. • The requisite data and analysis necessary to support the proposed change from Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Subdistrict to the requested institutional subdistrict was not provided, as required by Rule 9J - 5 F.A.C. • The data and analysis provided in support of the requested change was limited to compatibility findings associated with past Conditional Use approvals and the impediments limiting the expansion of existing facilities onsite. The data did not include a needs assessment or inventory of community facility or institutional uses in the immediate geographic area or on a countywide level. • According to the agent, onsite expansion opportunities for both the mental health facility and church are limited due to right -of -way acquisition by the County and FDOT for roadway improvements. Approximately 2.20 acres of the 10± acre David Lawrence site and .48 acres of the 5± acre Community Parkway church site were acquired. (it should be noted that the Amendment application indicates that SDP -AR- 2002 -2072, which provided for the expansion of the David Lawrence Center onsite, was not completed due to the Center's inability to provide the required native vegetation and stormwater management areas onsite.) XII. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's office. XIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CP- 2005 -6 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to not transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. However, if the CCPC should recommend transmittal, staff recommends the following: • Limit the development and uses on Tract 66 to stormwater management and preservation areas; 10 Agenda Item 4F • Limit the development and uses on Tract 59 to church, church - related uses (e.g. church - operated school and /or day care), and other institutional uses of the same or less intensity as church use; and, • Limit the development and uses on Tracts 43 and 50 to the existing David Lawrence Center use and to the amount of building expansion that could have occurred on those two tracts had 2.2 acres not been conveyed for right -of -way. 11 Agenda Item 4F PREPARED BY: DATE: /'-/q. c ;L IC LE MOSC CP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER MPREHENSI E PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: /�C l�✓�1�- --- 2 - 20 _� 7 DATE: DAVID WEEKS, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED RA DALL CO EN, AICP, DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: 2' 2-0, DATE: 2--2-0-07- MARJ IE M. STUDENT- STIRLING' ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: YEPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR DATE: o2v 0 MUNITY DEVELOPMENT & IRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN Petition No: CP- 2005 -6 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007 CCPC Meeting Note: This petition has been advertised for the June 4, 2007, BCC Meeting. ------ - � I `I `ee _'�filTllll _~ L— _ W- �lllJWi -llllWJ JIITIfIIII;1111111111111L I iLUI.uuI�1JWU1 �,il �IIIII111LIIJ1111 i I I I W1l 1 1 1 1 111.1 CIL I, � 111rr1n11 Irrull II �� 11 11.1.1111 I l l J_L11 innnln.lunn Ism n 7 7TI LIIIIJllLLL1llLLWllllll1LLL111�1W1llW I I, I I I sI I e I I i z Q EL L� Q D O rn� W r^^ WilsonMiller New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering Growth Management Plan Amendment Application For Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Prepared for: The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 Prepared by: WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 FWe Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Bldg. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 April 22, 2005 REVISED June 12, 2006 (in response to Collier County staff sufficiency letter dated May 3, 2006) Resubmitted September 12, 2006 (after receipt of finding of sufficient application) Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 wilsonmiller.com Growth Management Plan Amendment Application For Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Cover /Submittal Letter dated April 21, 2005 Sufficiency Review Letter to Richard Yovanovich from Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, dated May 3, 2006 Sufficiency Response Letter to Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, from Richard Yovanovich, dated June 12, 2006 Final Sufficiency Review Letter from Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, to Richard Yovanovich, dated September 5, 2006 Letter to Michele R. Mosca, Collier County Principal Planner, from Margaret Perry dated March 29, 2007 including Revised Exhibit B and Needs Analysis Application for a Request to Amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan Corporate Resolution — David Lawrence Foundation Letter from Church of God Regarding Board of Trustees List of Exhibits: Exhibit A Copies of deeds to properties Exhibit B Proposed language amendment Exhibit C Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment Exhibit D General Location Map /FLUE Designation Exhibit E Aerial Exhibit F FLUCCS Map Exhibit G Soils Map Exhibit H Listed Plant and Animal Species Exhibit H1 Listed Species Survey — Log of Time Spent On Site Exhibit H2 Listed Species Survey — Transect Map Exhibit I Letter from Division of Historical Resources Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit O Exhibit P Exhibit Q b62007� 151112 Ve, 051- MPERRY 1-. NO155 -011 -000. PCOP- 29249 County's Historical /Archaeological Sites Map Public Facilities Summary Public Facilities Map Utilities Location Exhibit Service Availability Letter to FGUA and Response from FGUA Service Availability Letter to Waste Management Flood Insurance Rate Map Traffic Impact Statement GOODLETTE COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW _evin G. Coleman Northern Trust Bank Building J. Dudley Goodlette 4001 Tamiami Trail North Kenneth R. Johnson Naples, Florida 34103 Richard D. Yovanovich (239) 435 -3535 Harold J. Webre, III (239) 435 -1218 Facsimile Edmond E. Koester Linda C. Brinkman Craig D. Grider Gregory L. Urbancic Matthew L. Grabinski Matthew R. Galloway Writer's e-mail: ryovanovich(t;gcjlaw.com April 21, 2005 Via Hand Delivery David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Collier County Comprehensive Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment Dear David: Per our pre - application meeting held on March 28, 2005, we are submitting an application to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Collier County Growth Management Plan on behalf of the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God. One original and five copies are being provided along with a check in the amount of $16,550.00. This application proposes the creation of a new subdistrict to be known as the "Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict' on approximately 16.3 acres of property located at 1 -75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. As we discussed, the expansion of Golden Gate Parkway inhibits the ability of these properties to expand as planned. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for the continued operation of the David Lawrence Center and Parkway Community Church of God as well as to allow for the planned expansion of these uses. The Subdistrict will allow for these properties to be redeveloped as institutional uses in the future. The uses allowed in the Subdistrict are very limited and are compatible with the surrounding area. David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Collier County Comprehensive Planning April 21, 2005 Page Two If you have any questions about this application or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me or Margaret Perry at Wilson Miller (239 - 649 - 4040). We look forward to working with your staff in the processing of this application. Very truly yours, Richard D. Yovanovich RDY:smc Enclosures SADATAMPDATA\LITIGATE \David Lawrence \4- 20- 05weeks.doc May 3, 2006 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Community Development and Environmental Services Division Comprehensive Planning Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104 Mr. Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Ste. 300 Naples, FL 34103 RE: Sufficiency Review of Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -6, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Dear Mr. Yovanovich: Pursuant to Paragraph B.3. of Resolution #97 -431, this letter is to inform you that the referenced Application is deemed insufficient. The following items need to be corrected, addressed, or added: 1. Disclosure of Interest Information 11.B: Provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify Chair is the authorized representative for the David Lawrence Foundation. 2. Disclosure of Interest Information II.C: Provide documentation to verify Trustees listed in the application are the authorized representatives for the Parkway Community Church of God (e.g. provide meeting minutes, etc., which identifies and authorizes listed individuals to conduct business on behalf of the church); Trustees listed in the application differ from the Trustees listed on the Deed. 3. Exhibit B: Add Policy 1. 1.2 and revise to reflect proposed Subdistrict. 4. Type of Request IV.C: Revise to read, From: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict" ... To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict' c c c t y D6-- (0101 4n1 11nn P.... tl101 GA1 c0<Q ......... ....n: o�...... ee, 5 Required Information V.A.2, Exhibit E: Identify source on aerial. 6 Required Information V.A.3, Exhibit D: Identify the existing land use on all properties within 500 feet from the boundaries of the subject property, e.g. Estates - Developed, Residential Single Family Home or Estates — Undeveloped tract. (Exhibits F & G)The Soils Map indicates the entire site contains hydric soils, but the FLUCCS map does not indicate any wetland jurisdictional determination; provide a copy of SFW MD Wetland Jurisdictional Line for the site and delineate on the FLUCCS Map. (Exhibit H) Provide a current listed species survey for the site that includes: date, time and etc. of listed species inspection; and, identify the specific species surveyed on the site. 8 Required Information V.D.5: Request includes: expansion of the existing David Lawrence Facility; expansion of the existing church facility — Community Parkway Church of God; and, specific associated and non - associated uses: Group Care Facilities (Categories I & II), Nursing homes, ALFs, Essential Services, Private Schools, Day Care Centers, Libraries, Government Offices, Medical Offices associated w/ Group Care Facilities, and Civic and Cultural Facilities. • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion. • Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence Facility prior to this application for a GMPA. • Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e. libraries, government offices, and etc. • Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. 9 Public Facilities V.E.1 Exhibits K N. & O: Provide responses from FGUA (Exhibits N & O). Provide projected commencement and build -out dates for project. List name of service provider, provide existing LOSS for Solid Waste (refer to 2005 AUI R), and, identify potential impacts from the proposed and expanded uses. 10. Public Facilities V.E.2, Exhibit L: Include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation on the map. Please address and /or provide the information as outlined above by June 4, 2006. Please note this letter is only to advise of a sufficiency finding, not to comment or advise on issues or concerns pertaining to the requested text and /or map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (GGAMP) to create the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Additionally, pursuant to Section 10.03.05F1 of the Local Development Code, adopted on June 8, 2005 (Ordinance #05 -27), there is now a requirement that the applicant coordinate, through the Community Planning Coordinator, Linda Bedtelyon, the holding of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. This Neighborhood Information Meeting will be the responsibility of the applicant. You may contact Ms. Bedtelyon at 213 -2948 if you have any questions. However, it is not expected that the first public hearings (transmittal hearings) will be held until early next year and that the timing of the Neighborhood Information Meeting should be such that it occurs just prior to the transmittal hearings which are held before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 403 -2466. Sincerely, is el AI P Principal her - CC: CP- 2005 -6 File David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Department Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator GOODLETTE COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Kevin G. Coleman J. Dudley Goodlette Kenneth R. Johnson Richard D. Yovanovich Edmond E. Koester Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Community Development and Department of Comprehensive 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34105 Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FI 34103 (239) 435 -3535 (239) 435 -1218 Facsimile June 12, 2006 Environmental Services Planning Linda C. Brinkman Stephen C. Pierce Gregory L. Urbancic William M. Burke Craig D. Grider Matthew L. Grabinski Matthew R. Galloway Matthew M. Jackson Alex R. Figares Jeffrey J. Beihoff Writer's e -mail: ryovanovich(crocilaw.com Via Hand Delivery RE: Sufficiency Response for Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) Petition #CP- 2005 -6, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: We are in receipt of your letter dated May 3, 2006, was deemed insufficient. We offer the following response to each item is indicated in bold. 1. Disclosure of Interest Information 11.6: indicating that the above - referenced application information in response to your request. Our Provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify Chair is the authorized representative for the David Lawrence Foundation. A copy of a Corporate Resolution for the David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. is included with the revised application. 2. Disclosure of Interest Information II.C: Provide documentation to verify Trustees listed in the application are the authorized representatives for the Parkway Community Church of God (e.g. provide meeting minutes, etc., which identifies and authorizes listed individuals to conduct business on behalf of the church); Trustees listed in the application differ from the Trustees listed on the Deed. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 2 of 5 Documentation verifying that the Trustees are authorized representatives is included with the revised application. 3. Exhibit B: Add Policy 1.1.2 and revise to reflect proposed Subdistrict. Exhibit B has been revised to reflect the proposed Subdistrict. 4. Type of Request IV.C: Revise to read, From: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict' ... To: "Estates Designation, Estates -Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict' Application has been revised to reflect this language. 5 Required Information V.A.2, Exhibit E: Identify source on aerial. Exhibit E has been revised to indicate the source of the aerial (2005 Collier County Property Appraiser). 6 Required Information V A 3 Exhibit D: Identify the existing land use on all properties within 500 feet from the boundaries of the subject property, e.g. Estates - Developed, Residential Single Family Home or Estates — Undeveloped tract. Exhibit D has been revised to indicate developed and undeveloped tracts. 7 Required Information V C Exhibits F G & H (Comments provided by the Environmental Planning Services Staff): (Exhibits F & G)The Soils Map indicates the entire site contains hydric soils, but the FLUCCS map does not indicate any wetland jurisdictional determination; provide a copy of SFWMD Wetland Jurisdictional Line for the site and delineate on the FLUCCS Map. A SFWMD wetland determination has not been performed on the subject property. WilsonMiller is in the process of submitting a wetland determination application to SFWMD and will provide a copy of the approved wetland determination to Collier County when it is received. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) mapped the site as containing hydric soils. However, small non - hydric soil inclusions (uplands) were often not mapped on properties by NRCS because of their small size. This becomes obvious when the FLUCCS map shows a section of the property containing pine flatwoods with saw palmetto ground cover, which typically occurs in upland (non - hydric) soils. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 3 of 5 Historically 50-60 years ago, this property may have exhibited hydric soil conditions. However, the construction of 1 -75 and canal, residential homes, and CR 951 and canal have altered ground water levels and severed wetland sheet flow in this region of Collier County. No signs of standing water, no hydric soil indicators and no living cypress knees indicate that this site no longer exhibits wetland characteristics. WilsonMiller does not anticipate SFWMD or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to assert wetland jurisdiction over any areas of the site. (Exhibit H) Provide a current listed species survey for the site that includes: date, time, and etc. of listed species inspection; and, identify the specific species surveyed on the site. WilsonMiller had previously provided Exhibit H in the original submittal which was a summary table of listed plant and wildlife species that have the potential to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site. The Collier County Comprehensive Plan Amendment application criteria does not require that a listed species survey be performed. However, WilsonMiller performed a listed species survey to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) standards to address staff comments and to alleviate any listed species issues Collier County or the FWC may have regarding the development of this project. WilsonMiller Exhibit H1, includes a table of the name of the ecologist, dates and times performing the listed species survey, site conditions and total hours spent on the property. WilsonMiller Exhibit H2, contains the approximate location of listed species transects performed on the property. The listed species survey concentrated on the species most likely to occur on the site: Big Cypress fox squirrel, gopher tortoise, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The Florida black bear and Florida panther are wide- ranging animals that have a low probability utilizing the site, primarily due to the property's geographical location. The subject property is surrounded by residential and non - residential development, major and secondary roads and highways, and canals. No signs of Florida panther or Florida black bear inhabiting or utilizing the site were documented during the listed species survey. The property contains a portion of pine flatwoods with a ground cover of saw palmetto. Use of the site by the Big Cypress fox squirrel and gopher tortoise was a possibility. However, gopher tortoise and Big Cypress fox squirrel were not documented utilizing or inhabiting the site. The only listed plant species observed on the site was the common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), twisted air plant (Tillandsia flexuosa) and giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata). These plants are listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture as endangered and are not listed by the FWC or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 8 Required Information V.D.5: Request includes: expansion of the existing David Lawrence Facility; expansion of the existing church facility — Community Parkway Church of God; and, specific associated and non - associated uses: Group Care Facilities (Categories I & II), Nursing homes, ALFs, Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 4 of 5 Essential Services, Private Schools, Day Care Centers, Libraries, Government Offices, Medical Offices associated w/ Group Care Facilities, and Civic and Cultural Facilities. • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to include this information. Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence Facility prior to this application for a GMPA. The David Lawrence facility has been operating at the current location since 1969 and has been expanded several times in the subsequent years. The most recent application for expansion was made in February 2002 (SDP -AR- 2072). However, the application was not completed as the significant right -of -way taking for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion and the Golden Gate Parkway /1 -75 interchange made the proposed expansion to David Lawrence Center application unable to meet the County's requirements for native vegetation preservation and stormwater management areas. • Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with a church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e. libraries, government offices, and etc. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to address this item. Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. Section V.D.5 of the application has been revised to address this item. 9. Public Facilities V.E.1 Exhibits K, N, & O: • Provide responses from FGUA (Exhibits N & O). To date, no response has been received from Florida Government Utility Authority to our request for service availability letter dated April 14, 2005. Included in the revised application, Exhibit N, is a follow up request letter to Bill Faust. Provide projected commencement and build -out dates for project. Exhibit K has been revised to include projected commencement and build -out dates for the project under the paragraph "other." List name of service provider, provide existing LOSS for Solid Waste (refer to 2005 AUIR), and, identify potential impacts from the proposed and expanded uses. Exhibit K has been revised to include the service provider (Collier County Solid Waste Management). Exhibit K also includes the level of service standard for solid waste per the 2005 AUIR. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Petition #CP- 2005 -6 Page 5 of 5 10. Public Facilities V.E.2, Exhibit L: • Include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation on the map. Exhibit L, Public Facilities Map, has been revised to include the Golden Gate Sheriff's Substation. I hope that the information contained in this response letter and the revised application and associated exhibits adequately address the items raised in your letter dated May 3, 2006. We will coordinate with you and Linda Bedtelyon regarding scheduling a neighborhood information meeting when advised that it is time to do so. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 435 -3535, or Margaret Perry at WilsonMiller, 649 -4040. ncerely, �J Richard D. Yovanovich cc: David Schimmel, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller, Inc. RDY:tIm S1DATA\WPDATA \LAND USE \DAVID LAWRENCE \SUFFICIENCY RESPONSE 6- 12- 06.DOC September 5, 2006 COLLIER COUNTYGOVERNNTM Community Development and Environmental Services Division Comprehensive Planning Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104 Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Goodlette, Coleman, and Johnson. P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 SEE 9 + 2-006 RE: Final Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CP- 2005 -6, proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Dear Mr. Yovanovich: Pursuant to Paragraph B.2 of Resolution #97 -431, please be advised the referenced application is deemed sufficient. Please note this letter is only to advise of a sufficiency finding, not to comment or advise on issues or concerns pertaining to the requested text and /or map amendment to the Growth Management Plan (Golden Gate Area Master Plan). Please submit, to my attention - by October 6. 2006 - the original and twenty-five (25) copies of the complete, assembled (3 -hole punch) GMP amendment application. Though this should be an adequate number of petitions, please know that it is possible that a few additional copies may be needed after the BCC hearing, if approved, to transmit to state agencies. Also, please be advised the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) Transmittal public hearing for this petition, and others in the 2005 cycle of Growth Management Plan amendments, is tentatively scheduled for February 19, 2007, and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Transmittal public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 2, 2007. The CCPC hearing begins at 8:30 a.m., the BCC hearing begins at 9:00 a.m., and both are held in the BCC Meeting Room on the 3`" Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Administration Building (Building F), Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, 34112. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2005 -27, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is now required for GMP amendment petitions; the NIM must be held prior to the CCPC Transmittal hearing. Please contact Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator, at 213 -2948, to coordinate the scheduling of the NIM. A second NIM will only be required if substantial changes are made to the petition subsequent to the Transmittal hearings. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, osca, AICP Principal Planner - cc: /CP- 2005 -6 File Margret Perry, Wilson Miller Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator C Y nom___ "1nl nTt nnnn c.... 1110N 1.1 ' nnG ^. ^ ^.• ^ ^n; °^` ^•,^ 1 March 29, 2007 Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Community Development and Department of Comprehensive 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34105 Nev, Dlrecams in Planning, Design of Engineering Environmental Services Planning RE: Update to Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application (Golden Gate Area Master Plan) and Needs Analysis for Petition #CP- 2005 -6, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Dear Ms. Mosca: At the public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission on March 5, 2007, changes to the proposed language for the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict were requested along with a needs analysis for the requested amendment. Enclosed please find the proposed revised language and the needs analysis report. We would appreciate you including this updated information with the Board of County Commissioners agenda packets. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 649 -4040 or Rich Yovanovich at 435 -3535. Sincerely, Mar4aret Perry, A,& Regional Manager, Development Planning and Approvals cc: David Schimmel, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. Rich Yovanovich, Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson Offices strate gical!y localed fo serve our chants 800. 54 9, 4335 Niples /Corporae OfficP 3200 Baiiaq LvrO. Suite 200 , Naolas, F rn 1-34705 ?39.6 19 -4D40 - ( 239.0 13 5710 ]/292007 166710 Vey Q11 MPERRV N0155 011 -000. PPHS- 29251 1 /aiut)nnuilleccom EXHIBIT B Amend page 5 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Policy 1.1.2: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: ESTATES — MIXED USE DISTRICT a. Residential Estates Subdistrict b. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict c. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict d. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict e. Conditional Use Subdistrict f. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay g. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill District h Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Amend page 42 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as follows: Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard e, xcept as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. Amend page 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43 50 59 and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30 and includes four parcels of land containing approximately 16.3 acres located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of 1 -75 and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The intent of the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is to provide for the continued operation of existing uses and the development and redevelopment of nstitut Anal And related uses rela ed to the existing uses The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses and will utilize well - planned access points to ensure safe and convenient access onto Golden Gate Parkway. The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict. 1 . Churches and other places of worship. 2. Group care facilities (Categories I and II). 1 Nursing homes and assisted living facilities. 4 Essential services as set forth in LDC Section 2.01.03. ,.,,' -11 1110 C" n11 1, 5. Private Schools. 6. Day care centers. iS'�09'� Vi:r poi- MVLKHY David Lawrence Center Needs Analysis Prepared in Support of GMP Amendment Application CP- 2005 -6 David Lawrence Center (DLC) focuses on restoring and rebuilding lives by providing affordable mental health and substance abuse services that are available to all. DLC was founded in 1968, and became a separate, not - for - profit 501 (c) (3) organization in 1976. A volunteer Board of Trustees governs the foundation. As stated in their 2005 -2006 Annual Report, over 15,000 clients were served during the year. Of those served, 73% were adults and 27% were children /youths. Forty -nine percent (49 %) of those served have a household income under $10,500 and 80% of the DLC clients are at or below the Federal Poverty Guidelines. Annually, over $4 million in discounted fees are provided to low- income families. DLC offers the following services: *24 -hour crisis stabilization *Adult detoxification *Affordable housing Assessment and referrals *Baker Act receiving center *Bridges — children residential psychiatric *Case management *Crossroads — residential substance abuse *Court referred services Employee assistance services *Geriatric outreach Group therapy Homeless outreach *Juvenile drug court Medication management Outpatient counseling Prevention and education Psychiatric services Therapeutic foster care * Indicates this services is provided only by DLC in Collier County David Lawrence Center has not added any office or medical staff space since 1986. As a result we have had to lease over 3,000 square feet of space on Radio Road for additional staff due to client volume. In addition, we have had to remodel existing facilities and remove meeting and group rooms to subdivide them into additional staff offices. We also have two portable facilities onsite that need to be removed as they have outlived their usefulness and comprise a little over 3,000 square feet. That space has to be replaced for, one, an alternative classroom and two, office space for approximately 20 staff. In addition, DLC had to go off site and purchase an office condo on the North Trail (2,400 square feet) to meet addition outpatient demand. Storage space has also been rented and increased over the last 20 years. DLC also has off -site facilities in Immokalee and on Horseshoe Drive. ].].]00] 135110 1 MVE(!Rl' N0155 II i 1- 01:0 -1P16 2925 Our biggest issue is overcrowding on a 14 -bed adult crisis stabilization unit which is over census approximately 50% of the time. The Department of Children and Families planning data states that Baker Act Receiving Facilities should have one bed for every 10,000 population. With the average permanent /seasonal Collier County population over 340,000 citizens, David Lawrence Center should be operating 34 beds and we are only currently operating 14 beds. That coupled with the chronic overcrowding is the reason we want to expand our emergency services and crisis stabilization unit. DLC's current client load continues to grow 2 -3% /year as evidenced by our increased client numbers. In 1977, when the current Golden Gate site was constructed, DLC had approximately 30 staff. Today, in 2007 the Center has approximately 350 fulltime staff. DLC currently has limited meeting room space, no training or educational space, and several staff are doubled up in single offices. DLC staff cannot convene in one location and we have to go out and rent neighborhood churches in order to have DLC -wide staff meetings. The need for additional mental health services in the community is directly related to the population increase. Our last office space expansion was in 1986 so over the last 21 years DLC has not added any additional space yet the population has increased significantly. National statistics indicate that one in four Americans will suffer from a mental health or behavioral healthcare issue and while some local citizens can be accommodated at alternate locations, the Golden Gate site must expand to meet the community's current need. The addition of approximately 20,000 square feet will simply help us meet the current need and will ease overcrowding over the next 5 years. DLC is limited in starting new programs that would meet the community need because of lack of space. V'� 1111 W0.?oM15 2981 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER: DATE RECEIVED: PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: DATE SUFFICIENT: PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (239) 403 -2300; Fax: (239) 643- 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at (239) 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Lisa Merritt, Chair Company The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health Inc. Mailing Address 6075 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239- 455 -1031 Fax Number 239- 455 -6561 B. Name of Applicant(s) Paul S Dykes Len E. Coley, Paul Bellofutto Trustees Company Parkway Community Church of God Mailing Address 5975 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239 - 455 -1534 Fax Number 239 - 455 -4637 L 120 15 aQ Vec011-WERRY N015 N0155 -011 -� PCOP- 29249 - C. Name of Agent" Richard Yovanovich • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company /Firm Goodlette Coleman and Johnson P.A. Mailing Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239 -435 -3535 Fax Number 239 - 435 -1218 Email Address ryovanovicht )gcilaw com D. Name of Owner(s) of Record Same as applicants. Mailing Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Margaret Perry, AICP Jared Brown, P.E. Jeff Perry, AICP Tom Trettis, PWS, CE Katherine Chachere DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 51311 P 150002 Ver'. 011 I.PERRY 2 N015S011- 00PPCOP 29249 G B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. David Lawrence Center is owned by The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc., a Florida Non - Profit Corporation. The Officers of this corporation are listed below. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Carol Ann May, Chair Michael H. Morris Immediate Past Chair Jean Ackerman 1s` Vice Chair Lisa Merritt Treasurer John Scot Mueller Secretary C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Parkway Community Church of God is owned by the Local Board of Trustees of the Church of God. The Trustees are listed below. Tony Stewart is the pastor of the Church. Name and Address Percentage of Interest Paul S Dykes Trustee Len E Coley Trustee Paul Belafato Trustee D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership L3112C 150802 Var 011- NPEPFY Cuu N015S011 -Poo- POOP 29249 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired ® leased ❑ : Terms of lease yrs /mos. Please see copies of deeds, Exhibit A. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description Tracts 43 50 59 and 66 Unit 30 Golden Gate Estates B. Section: 29 Township: 49 South Range: 26 East C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 38163640007 38164200006 38165120004 38165640005 D. General Location North side of Golden Gate Parkway between 1 -75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard E. Planning Community Golden Gate F. TAZ 193 G. Size in Acres ±16.3 H. Zoning E- Estates I. Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Golden Gate Estates IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: W1'0 1W 02 Ver 011- MPERRY N0155 11 -000. PLOP 29249 ❑ Future Land Use ❑ Immokalee Area Master Plan ❑ Transportation ❑ Coastal & Conservation ❑ Intergovernmental Coord. ❑ Sanitary Sewer ❑ Drainage ® Golden Gate Area Master Plan ❑ Capital Improvement ❑ Housing ❑ Recreation & Open Space ❑ Potable Water ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Natural Groundwater Aquifer Amend Page(s) 5. 42 and 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element As Follows: (Use Gress thFGWghs to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please see Exhibit B. C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, FROM: Estates Designation Estates - Mixed Use District Residential Estates Subdistrict District, Subdistrict TO: Subdistrict [If new District and /or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. Please see Exhibit C. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) E. Describe additional changes requested: N/A V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8 Y: x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. ® Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD. DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Please see Exhibit D. 2. ® Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Please see Exhibit E. 3. ® Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. Please see Exhibit D. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. ® Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. Please see Exhibit D. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. ® Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT - FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Please see Exhibits F and G. 2. ® Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, &312000-15 03 V.r01! -WERRV W15 N013S011 -0 W -PLOP- 2828 avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). Please see Exhibits H1 and H2. 3. ® Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological State. Please see Exhibits I and J. D. GROWTH MANAGMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district /subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). Per staff request in their sufficiency letter dated May 3, 2006, the following information is provided: • For each Tract, provide the acreage acquired by the County for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion: Golden Gate Estates Unit 30 Tract No. FDOT ROW Taking acres Collier County ROW Easement acres 43 1.02 0 tO.48 50 1.18 0 59 0.21 0.27 66 0 0.25 513112M- 150K2 Vey'. 011- MPERRY N0155 -011 -000. POOP- 29249 Provide the SDP or other plans prepared for the expansion of the David Lawrence -- Facility prior to this application for GMPA. The David Lawrence Facility has been operating at the current location since 1969 and has been expanded several times in the subsequent years. The most recent application for expansion was made in February 2002 (SDP -AR- 2072). However, the application was not completed as the significant right -of -way taking for the Golden Gate Parkway expansion and the Golden Gate Parkwayll -75 interchange made the proposed expansion to David Lawrence Center application unable to meet the County's requirements for native vegetation preservation and stormwater management areas. Provide justification /rationale for the proposed uses not generally associated with a church or mental health care and substance abuse treatment facility, i.e., libraries, government offices, and etc. The proposed Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict is intended to provide for the continued operation of the existing uses (church and mental health facility) and the potential for development or redevelopment of the property for similar service and institutional, low impact uses, such as day care centers, nursing homes, essential services, libraries, etc. The proposed subdistrict has been designed with a specific level of flexibility for the future, that would permit with the appropriate approvals (conditional use or PUD), some similar (yet different from the existing) uses that might also be found compatible with the surrounding land uses, and be deemed appropriate for the specific location. The fact that the subdistrict is immediately adjacent to a multi -lane arterial -level highway lends the subdistrict's location to uses that might benefit from better roadway access, such as government offices or libraries, uses that are "active" during the day, but are frequently non - intrusive in the evening and at night. The uses proposed for the Subdistrict are very limited, and will require further permitting processes either through the conditional use process or a rezone to PUD process, thereby providing for public input and hearings to ensure that any new proposed use will be compatible and complementary to the surrounding area. Address compatibility of new and expanded uses with surrounding properties. The uses permitted within the proposed subdistrict are generally considered to be compatible with the permitted uses in the district due to adjacency to the arterial -level highway, large tract sizes and required design and compatibility- related development standards that accompany such development, including buffering and open space requirements. Historically, these types of uses, as evidenced by the existing institutional and church uses (approved as conditional uses) have been able to demonstrate their compatible nature during the required public hearing and site plan approval process. As such compatibility of proposed new uses will be determined through either the conditional use or rezoning to PUD process. The existing uses (church and mental health facility) were previously approved through the conditional use process, and were found to be compatible with the surrounding properties. Expansion of the existing uses on the properties with prior conditional use approval (Tracts 43, 50, and 59) will be allowed through the permitting process (site _ development plan). Expansion of the existing uses on the property without conditional use approval (Tract 66) will require conditional use approval by the Board of County Y 112 W 150802 Ver 011- MPERRY W N015S01 1 000. PCOP- 29249 Commissioners. Compatibility of any expansion of the existing uses on Tract 66 would _. have to addressed during the conditional use approval process. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: x Potable Water x Sanitary Sewer x Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS x Drainage x Solid Waste x Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. x Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. x Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. Please see Exhibits K - Q. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. ® Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Zone X. 2. ® Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). Not applicable. 3. ® Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. Not applicable. 4. ® Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. Not applicable. 5. ® High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). Not applicable. G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. ® $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. ❑ $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made 5/]112000 - 150802 Va[011 -WERRV LNN NO? 55 -01I -000. PLOP. 29249 payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. - 3. ❑ Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. ® Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). Exhibit A. 5. ® Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. ® 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. ` Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 5/313006150903 Ver Ot,- MPERRY NO15S01 f -W0. POOP- 29249 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Coiner County Growth Manag ment Plan affecting property identified in the Application. / Signed; Dater L4WM—e of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the for . he tion, and t wl hat the application is true, correct and complete to t my knoedge. Signature of Applicant Lisa Merritt Chair _ Name — Typed or Printed The David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. STATE OF ( ) COUNTY OF Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of " °I 2006 By T / blic) MY COMMISSION (N ary dteYAM i OD 1p7/Y CH09,SE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: OMM� t1111nM MM who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.08 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a Public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degres, penis �abie as prov §der] by a 9ne to a r nax4mum of $530.4! ar,dior maximum. o= r, sixty dayJsV term." �a,aans rxmz yr a�'- v+Eaer 1 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: ' Date: �d 1 ame of Owner(s ec rd Signed: / Date: (Name of Owner(s) of Record) Signed: Date:' (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Paul S. Dykes, Trustee Name — Typed or Printed Park y Community Church of God x yn , Signature of Applica t Len E. Colev. Trustee Name — Typed or Printed Parkway CommuniV Church of God Signature of Appl-ica Paul Bele%!o 1 ?E II ;4i T7—r, Name — Typed or Printed Parkway Community Church of God 011 &2M5. 151088 Vx'. 01L MPERRY C.V N015$ 11L -PCOP 29249 STATE OF ( COUNTY OF ( Sworn to and subscribed before me this 41 day of '20 L) I By ( ary Public) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath ✓ did not take an Oath MY COMMISSION ;!e:•.nyj JANICE P. MILLARD MY COMMISSION k DO 166809 - eEXPIRES: . hrNovembeLW 2W6 +(fah• �v�uRW,ma. as identification STATE OF COUNTY OF ( ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of c C 20_� ��✓,.v<- TNotary Public) CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath <I181200& 151000 Ver 011 - MPERRY wi5 N0155-0f1{p0 -POOP -29209 MY COMMISSIO _ JANICE P. MILLARD °r r MY COMMISSION # DO 166809 S EXPIRES: November 20,2006 �'.k h a lvedThruNO yPW*unamia«9 as identification LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich (Name of Agent - typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: \ c,- -4 Date: i7 - Q-0 ( (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. na,p ,,�Sc L�- �Signature of Applicant Paul S Dykes Trustee Name - Typed or Printed Parkway Community Church of God STATE OF (-I koc i (Ac�- ) COUNTY OF ( Q_4Dk1 [Sworn to and �s�ufbscrriibeed before me this �� day of , 200 ?(Notary Pubc) <�— MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Kirnberly K Mayeu My Commission oo115s21 CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Exprea June 2s, 2W6 X _ who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 0118RWS 151008 Ver 011- MPERRV CJ3 N015S01IL 0-PCOP -39209 FOUNDATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES Carol E. Shaw Fxeeative Dimetor Lisa Merritt Chairman Jean Ackerman Beth Shaw - Adelman Clay W Cone Charles Denny Elynor Flegel William Jensen William Hobgood, Esq. Charles Krause, M.D. Dick Lynch, Esq. Carol Ann May .-.. John Mueller Molly Ottina, E.D. Elizabeth Star Jaynie Whitcomb 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34116 voice 239 - 455 -5500 fax 239- 455 -6561 www.davidlawrenceccnterorg CORPORATE RESOLUTION AND CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY I, the undersigned hereby certify that I am the Chairperson and custodian of the records of David Lawrence Foundation, Mental Health, Inc. (legal name of corporation), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Florida (the "Corporation "); that the following is a true and correct copy of certain resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said Corporation at a meeting duly held on the a day of December, 2005, at which a quorum was present; and that the following resolution is in conformity, and not in conflict, with the charter and by -laws of said Corporation and has not since been rescinded or modified. Authorized Representatives Resolved that Chairman of the Board of Trustees of David Lawrence Foundation be and is hereby granted the right to be the authorized representative of said Foundation. Further resolved, that the Executive Director of this Corporation is also hereby authorized to execute to represent said Foundation. Signatures of Officer EXECUTIVE Lisa Merritt Carol Shaw behalf %the Corporation. a " CIIUQCK of GOD FZOrida state Executive Offfices February 27, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE NO. 239.455.4637 AND FIRST -CLASS MAIL The Reverend Tony Stewart Parkway Community Church of God 5975 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 -7456 Dear Brother Stewart Pursuant to your letter dated February 25, 2004,1 hereby concur with the selection of the following local board of trustees for the Parkway Community Church of God in Naples: Len Coley Paul Bellofatto Paul S. Dykes Pursuant to the General Assembly Minutes, S.46. LOCAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, I. Selection: Each local church or congregation that owns any property (either real or personal), shall appoint a Local Board of Trustees, to consist of not less than three members, said board to be selected by the local congregation in a business meeting. DWSffh 3736 CRAGMONT DRIVE, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33619 (813) 620 -3366 602-03 ,g4 i amp FLO 210 A 8 Ad fill" flit o i�� F y ..f NA i1 . v 9 I-- "ate oj -_8 Iso m� IN� I jj j M - 16 -a aW w� roSi�F'u � o O Rnn,om On-ST cn en i ry 177 d 4 � N � u A•i-' T 'JJa a rids Duament Prep.red BY dad Return tat nomad K. Rose, Jr., Saquirs •man, Deifik, Lanier 6 Ross, p,A. Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 206 "'es, ' FL 34105 1D Number 36165640005 Grantee of TIN: Grantee #2 TIN: Warranty Deed This Indenture, Madethis ei+l'1'v-dayof 4 Linda G. Allevo and Michael Allevo, wife v * ** 3027578 OR: 3087 FG: 2374 * ** g1toulif In Oman RICOROS If COLLAR caum, IL 01 101 /2002 at 01;23H OINIT 1, OROn, CDW CORE 230000,00 ABC I111 6,00 Roth: OW-70 1610.00 8263 P1ssID010 Rt AL 2640 =DIN GAPR PM 1305 was n mn 2002 A.D., Between and husband Of the County of Collier I Smm of Florida , grantors, and The David Lawrence Foundation For Mental Health, Inc -, a Florida Non Profit Corporation whose uldrcas is: 6075 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116 of the county of Collier , stain of Florida , grantee. WttneSSeth that the GRANTORS, for and in cmnidendon ofine sum of am Omer __- .___.,____.._ --- TEN DOLLARS ($10)___ ____ _________ _______ DOLLARS. good and valuable eaMi flan to GRANTORS in hand paid by GRANTED to receipt whereof is hemby acknowledged, have gmnted, barg.ined aM sold to the s.id GRANTEE and GRANTEe'S ham, succours' and deigns tbmvcr, the lhllowing desenbed land, simem, lying and bring in the County of Collier stare of Florida mwn: Tract 66, tint 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to 2002. a s .e. s i� _N 0 m G p e a� d� o- w j 6 � Z 3 S and ms granues do hereby fully we"Ant the tide m sold told, and will defend the same against lawful elsirm of all Passe. wMmsower. in Witness Whereofsec g... have hsonnon an their hands end seal, the day and year fna above widen. iigned, sealed and delivered in our presence: 1 C >s� BA_ ._ (S-i) rioted Name: Linda G, Allevo PR�OSs. Ad //dress: 6119937 PPnnrken Rammoek Rood, Naples, FL 34112 Fri ed Name: l �f"V61l e� (Srsl) Ki tness —Emmert cv.enael Allevo P.O. Address: 6197 Parkes nammeek Read, Naples, M 34112 TATE OF Florida .OUNTY OF Collier _ The fomgoing hu no ent wu acknowledged before me his day of J V� ainda G. Allevo and Michael Allevo, wife and husband 2001 by vs ar 'molly known tomonrwhchava Paoducedlheir Florida dr V r' s license at idenGfi..tho, ` �MY SON _ 009599 Pt' n tad Name: NLtary Public My Comm ission E.Pim: 4wwoawmlM Onns�rsynna,.lne, mm la6n',wm Fmmetwp.l EXHIBIT A 04/06/2005 13:16 2394556561 P Iw taWyed Title Geematy Ned. Od.W , Ro d& SS %anty Bud MAI0T0lY FlOm— SE(II0ll aq 07 F ! i atr. bias. A,ad. " 20th del. M Agri . 0$ORG6 DEMIPPR, TRUSTER and as an individual of " Cdeettr of Collier S'°'e a Florida DLC PAGE 05 Q) This inarvmem ..a. prrporrgl b•. Home- ttobert,._E.�Les Jr. Adder. 5-QQ.rifth.,AXA a ^ath - Naplen -FLa, ;login 10 77 _ YerEWlrr V 684 w16M gronbr•, Fed TN POMDATION, INC. , a Florida Corporation, ..imm oa.t dam add.... i. 500 Filth Avenue South, Naples, 33960 ad ar cawde d collior Florida w.,aw`_ mumime ft n eet .ed wane., l. v • b n„u,daaeae. d ..r .,� y ------ — -------------- ------ Tan &Ala 00/ 100 - �A sM edeaa Owed .ppd .deeb4 aanli0wasoel a .a.a ryanuw e. Ip.d PeN b le.d awe.. Mw m.wpl xb..,./ 0 6em6, atbppge.la/ped,. 6a, amel.d. boliePr.d e.d rP4 m ape .a,d w..n+, o.4 awe». i, ...d a.ea•ea Ewa ». eti jro 110"A"d (e0W . bt,. %** d bang u. Collier co. fl... reel Ttaat 43, Golden Gate Estates. Unit #10, being a.S -ROM parcal, wore or less, as aw.eordad in lie alocarda or Collier R� M N+ THIS re UNIVuoltmo NM- NOINWTVAO PROP6FCTT_ Ad cold alMMw Awt he..6, fVN Wetlnl dN'k. b w.l .yam —A .Y. d.a.M d1 Hrw, ega.wt IM IP-IVI ektM at ea afMnF V6ala.PayP1. 1 "Omntw' WW ng.aP.M.• wY sM 1 las �. w P1wM M .yMyr ..p,,,M IN �IdMMr ft?at Gael.. IIP. b..,..,rp ,.. qw..,, • Icy% P..d ""Ole ana .ear Ant P6e..'.dlwP. Mined. I.dN eaW deaw..d m e.. enwwa: ✓�/ L..1 N �F ll C 60N — q•=.ufl tee and asit an r-11 r-11 iod lvi6t1�f1 (Seen Seal ATE OF ALORIOA Mr: C ss PH Ji XWTY a COLL11M *VW CERTIFY Ilea as 1N. eery I..hn nr, an *free. deer PYe1,r M rok w,roN.dq,.«ah xnenaar eoP.arad 61"" GEMrlT7T, TrusCea and eta an individual lee blman to be IM De--t dmed M b.d in a,a +r .eae..Md Me hveganq .n.l...e,vnr ..w x4..w4doed Mbre m. mar A" reme. �Yat ti_!1'�100 drw:el rM In Me CoureV ere( SM.. a, eforFt►M IM. 2 t�1 of April Cam aNNC ,T.,Fp` , Ya' eta% «+mod: w tw,. Iqq 3.t�iN-h hwMl A CMr. w l.pnM Wr 04/06/2005 13:16 2394556561 DLC PAGE 04 V WT. 3 � 7enn� �Itis lbdrranty Deed . %A,d.. s45css 0A M pi jjfi79 •1 „r .4 April A 1, 1n80 1:r GALEN E HANES & RIA F. S, his wife, As .loins Tenants With Fulj, Rights of $urvivors6iV G.•rcinn(h+ r^N•,f 11” (uru•Iw, i.. THE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION, INC. n•An.n r••'wIY•� nffn•.. ;, 6075 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 33999 lu•nrrm(Irr rnffwr da• rnnrdw•; 11RL1d���� nvm• .n ..A •....r. nr, x...a�r M e.vp..e:.r.: taettl: '(hnr rl.,. nr.un.... A.r ,,...! n. ,•.n.,l.l.mu,ur ,.l d•' .un� n( 5 10. 00 ^ud o0,nr raLmLG nuu %dnnnnu.. nv,rrn mh•..n.l i, Grr••!.y nrFnan•L.Inrd, G....Go rr.r•,n.. ..nrl,. rd.". r•fr...r., rnnrr.. rr�,f .,... .... n. der nn.urrr, nfl iL,d rr.m;,• h,nd .w,�a,- !r. Collier C•.n,vy. FGuidn..rc: The west 150' of Tract 50, Unit 304 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Sook7• Page 58 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to restrictions, easements and reservations (including Oil, gas and mineral rights and /or leases) of record applicable thereto, and to taxea for the current year and subsequent years. ,1O6et{tee u,i1G ntl dm bnrmrrn., hrrrdunnrwd, nruf alm•rnrnnru•ws IGrn.m Gnrn rn nine nPWMff^ihA. ^R o o, m ^nr �-10 ,Mane aad to Raid, (71K1W 1h. ~t- Gr eAY Cw•rnanl. u +ftA mld pn...,'r flrnr rh' arnnrn' :. lour ..Q :elvx( of In rLnafn; Jal 1h. pnrnlor A.. send d l,r ( x ndfold 6.4 nd « P and rnu•lur nulGWry re soli end ronury .n1d rand; IAne 1fw nN mm F..nAy Jelly wnemnfs IAr 110r to .14 l.nd and uglf Afwui A, ,anr aaofmr she ferefu[ C61. of Oa.,. ndrmne :odd fA^I'.id fend 1. [n' of nll rmvmhM. , eACr 1 lexpr x+uin 1e Da 6' 51, 10 80 ]a >a VAm 16htmf, up kr.f e6ew u^+llrn. drGnnnnl In ea P•rM•�; STATE or FLORIDA J co"IT (If COLLIER e.rhnr:.ed � 4 SUM .rwraldM..A �nd th'hGun,m.l —io 1. e1.4 .'Lw44m'.n, Y... t' .pp' CALM E. HANES and GLORIA F. HANES .�.. •w".wrp,e u.r .,' ear they • t . � •fed eFGna1 w.l inlhe Ce.4ry AM R�dBa.� .. a1 �'�: ' •.cm er'rd 1 'C- A dJr Su1ncu 500TFMAVENUE SMIf NAPIES.RONIDA 79900 i ►J H ownrZ n o A ?x °H _- w•e�o1M.w..e.•eLla e Id M i .m. 4 M AC auA r. Y5nn de rtOl:w L IM. 1 GF . Mn 04/06/2005 13:16 2394556561 DLC PAGE 03 (� a �J 0!818 /1111:16 # 11179 IQ1581 elt:$Qfij( ' This instrument x(; prepared bp� Michael P. Jones, Esq. JONES 6 SELMAN, P.A. 4501 N. Tamlami Trail, f3D4 Naples, Florida 33940 23118 11SK01=9S, made this LO,, day Of February, 1986, between 71ILI,IAM E. EAIE and VIOLET I. BAIN, his rife, as Joint Tenpnts with Full Rights of Nurvivorahip, Grantor, and THE FOONDATiON FOR MENTAL REALTE, 3EC., Whoa* Post office address is 0/0 Mr. Carl E, westman. 1300 3r4 street south, 1303, Naples, Florlda 33940, Grantee, •iTE, that sold Grantor, for and is consideration of the siduera sn Of Ten Dollars (610.00), and other good and valuable contions to said Grantor in band paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and Hold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the fclloWinq described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -vie: The Nast 180 feet of Tract $0, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, accordlng to the plat thereof recorded In Plat Book 7, page 59, public Records of Collier County, Florida. subject to easementsr rsstricticas and reservations of record and taxes for the currant and subsequent years. �r and said Grantor does hazaby fully warrant the title to said lane, who '�. maoavez, and will defend the sane against the lawful claims of all persona aGrentozw and "Grantees are used for singular and plural, as context requires. r the day >EW, Grantor ham set Grantor's hand and seal Y year first above written. signed, sealed and delivered j in our prasaaeae ` F - wILLIAM E. MAIN 1. Q-4 � VI I. FAIN CYRf�la GFFBARA80TA -4palif gMtM novledgsieatas psisoaslly arearedfficer duly 46 BAIN sad VIOL" I. BAIN to as known to be the pr 11descrf described z. far Ana %be BEeoutad the for t mad (a acknowledged * .befafe..ad. that th ageing instrument and aaknuwladged ep axscaeed the saws. bead and official seal in the County and' ll(Bt 6`i'e Lp- aI thYm . day of February, 1986. v rr it6'cNvEd� dTci'6,f+.1�JJ. ®Cy3r r r .. ; L$CeRienTary Tax .. '',T'`•.....;�,'y'6 ,F't. Cc5iRer County, n Wial 2. C rk IYiCA'IH D.C. .bR" r f %17y' 04/13/2005 14:14 2394556561 DLC PAGE 02 12'38 PM PARKWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH 239 455 4637 I raw state at — KNOW ALL M" lay THM plazzingwing, County that for and in eawderuon of the an= of &;R.-.Oo—. ............... ... cub, andAht-itt thet votiqlawraft - at.._ .... ..... .......... ... .... .. --l...........—.— . .. . .................. -- .. ...... . ....... . ....... . . .................. . ..... 14"W belong ackld"I"gled to Fuld, Rod in hand paid to graned, by the *rMawSM added to Uds jonVOROOR We. LEROY HAWXTNS AND RAYMOND H. SJNNRTT. TRUSTEES ........ . . .......... the Mid FraotOTA ad OR&= RARGAffl. ML and QONVXT onto grantees, ..... . BArAN JOHNSON And .... .. L ... .... ... ..... __ ... . ................. ... ........... -MfiitUUr4 UM Laval Board of Thmia" of C,olden bath.__.._. Collier the Clamb Of God at—:. .... ..... —7- . . ........ ... ... ........ . Florida. the indenting dedialbecl larift l7bog, being and mlliu%bod in - . ...... County. Florida,, dawrtW m follows, vii: Tract 59, Unit M, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 68, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT to sasefflanU, restrict /oils and m3erviltid"S Of record, TO HAV111 AM TO ZOLO onto th, said .._._.DEAN CANNON BRIAN JOWSON ..... .. ........... ........ ....... . - are Tre"M MAX Vdk^V1duAff OW fact! Board at TEAM$@& of the Churtih of God at, ....!.-Sajdan Gats- in Collier _ Muni , _FI,p!jqA 1111",ZA: , " to uwlr nwa4doft In %rded, " RUIVAN fOrtIff. And Adis- It* Said LOW amid at Trudes; Same halo use to. disease and control the 044 real "Alto for the gorier" ame and "Mot of the Churob of add' he'Ing Its Posts' hmKdq"eA" 'it cle"'Real TOden"Ree- and far the parodular on and benefit of the local emlttntnpet of the Mid Ghucft at (le", FePkAlay, N-41'Ples, Florida 33899 klu=0 ". ="—w "�ftl MUM= OR M RW ROOM" a M. Ana clOcOrt, ft ORetten, of fWa MA 64 0. Ran And ISO do, for _help, 10100011010 and adintNetnttra, covenant 'Ith the Mid Add 7111stm. And Medditutlog the tmel EASd at Trade" of She church of and at _2ojdAh,.Qste --- --- COontY, . . ........ their Ucca"dis In ~ LVA hatutne, that we are -- .... . ....... ........ .... .... lavloby sled in fee sli"nie of aid pleaded: that tr4y &% 00% from 01 encumbrances; And that - —... have a good tight An SON add coATO the "me " afor4ol4: Said . we Will," PlAt'" helm, attediladve And A4111111131611PRIOPL Shell Warritot and ddmd QW Meet SO live Mid ...... LEAN CANtI, BRIAN JOHNSO.N _._..__.__.._.....___._,..w.. ...... . and .. .... .... .. . ....... Tredledn' And 00"Allindivill lAtO Local Board Of 711591446 of the Churcl, of OW at 2%.P.9k OATS .. ....... I . ...... _jt�llf@r . . ...... Flae-ids the tRwful County . .. .............. ---, —, claims of am Verjoat - -- - I %h&lr 'Re""M In T`VuA And 11419no forever, Against In witollm Whereof .. .... . have hGMDtG alt Our— hand .1 and Real F........ , On this the Q7 . day of WIVISU Ad witatural! :13CAL [am) A1&ALj iSFALi •(En'droctle"Al—'rhis dftd mMb be Signed, achn"Teollod aide rL%l0ANd to Oceatd1ne with the U., or he State Where the otederty 14 jwated.� lilt R F1oMdd Hfakof ____ -._.. __�._......,...�..._. ; .__ �_ �.._ �......,.....�..- .._.- .._. —.—._ .__,..._�_�.... «..,,..., In a notary Public: Ior said county, in Said etas, herehy netlfy that .ARM�dP,,, CBN.... lERQI:.lI AWICItlS.ANII_RAY}IOND..N.,.6ENME eUayt .__....._.. daaed to the forakmns aoneByanca, read who ..st:G - -.... known to me, aakaowlryed before me en thiS day, that irn Mtnlramed of um oottrneta or the eomeytmn AhRY.. 44YA_ ..axacuted the Mahn ydturthodly oo the day ahe a.me bean w"De. � .r 61eeh Under ms tuna and teat, thin the �. d►y of .,, .. �i __....._.,..,,........_._.___. II- yMlfC ••_.,._--- -'-(duMh o /Jk!iN tlGe.• ................... _ u' ewk7detoe CIO. AN 2 i0A g__�._.f. (+cW+Artket.. . eoaefo MM I, aye, uw. ftyt�rdXklis�et� Ex ireet State of...._..... .......�......... . �..._...._ I. ........_ ............... ....,..��.,,............ Camaba ,..........-_._.____ ._.._�_....,..._...._.......... ... .... W Wed. .. .. for Sold aoouty, is um olate, do baby aAeafy Mat as the ... day ot ..__ .._....... _ ...... _._...._. -__.. before me the via" emoted .... ,....,...._..._.......__,..._.___._........... . ..... '...... __......_., enawn to me far Such known W mel to be the Vih Of the wlthte tamAtl _.__........... . ........ ...... who betas etuedead aawarea Bud apart emm the hummAd. tcaohluo her dehatwx W the w11111e .... . ...... ....... .... ��......__.., Acknowledged that She Signed the yams oI nor mvn frta %1U and wourd. and without tear, debatrauts or thmta pe the dart of the hbeheed. In wnomo Wheleot. I hard lateuhW Me my hand thIM . _........_nay of .........,._ .., . to..._. retaW elltrtal find) 2O-d L£9t, mso 6£Z HnanHo A1INnuwoo AemNauA Wd 8£CZT S ®9Z- £i -4d+'1 � v F1oMdd Hfakof ____ -._.. __�._......,...�..._. ; .__ �_ �.._ �......,.....�..- .._.- .._. —.—._ .__,..._�_�.... «..,,..., In a notary Public: Ior said county, in Said etas, herehy netlfy that .ARM�dP,,, CBN.... lERQI:.lI AWICItlS.ANII_RAY}IOND..N.,.6ENME eUayt .__....._.. daaed to the forakmns aoneByanca, read who ..st:G - -.... known to me, aakaowlryed before me en thiS day, that irn Mtnlramed of um oottrneta or the eomeytmn AhRY.. 44YA_ ..axacuted the Mahn ydturthodly oo the day ahe a.me bean w"De. � .r 61eeh Under ms tuna and teat, thin the �. d►y of .,, .. �i __....._.,..,,........_._.___. II- yMlfC ••_.,._--- -'-(duMh o /Jk!iN tlGe.• ................... _ u' ewk7detoe CIO. AN 2 i0A g__�._.f. (+cW+Artket.. . eoaefo MM I, aye, uw. ftyt�rdXklis�et� Ex ireet State of...._..... .......�......... . �..._...._ I. ........_ ............... ....,..��.,,............ Camaba ,..........-_._.____ ._.._�_....,..._...._.......... ... .... W Wed. .. .. for Sold aoouty, is um olate, do baby aAeafy Mat as the ... day ot ..__ .._....... _ ...... _._...._. -__.. before me the via" emoted .... ,....,...._..._.......__,..._.___._........... . ..... '...... __......_., enawn to me far Such known W mel to be the Vih Of the wlthte tamAtl _.__........... . ........ ...... who betas etuedead aawarea Bud apart emm the hummAd. tcaohluo her dehatwx W the w11111e .... . ...... ....... .... ��......__.., Acknowledged that She Signed the yams oI nor mvn frta %1U and wourd. and without tear, debatrauts or thmta pe the dart of the hbeheed. In wnomo Wheleot. I hard lateuhW Me my hand thIM . _........_nay of .........,._ .., . to..._. retaW elltrtal find) 2O-d L£9t, mso 6£Z HnanHo A1INnuwoo AemNauA Wd 8£CZT S ®9Z- £i -4d+'1 EXHIBIT B Amend page 5 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Policy 1.1.2: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT a. Residential Estates Subdistrict b. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict c. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict d. Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict e. Conditional Use Subdistrict f. Southern Golden Gate Estates Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay g. Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill District h Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Amend page 42 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as follows: Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned 1 -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties - abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment shall be approved for conditional uses. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. Amend page 45 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to add the following: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict This Subdistrict is specific to Tracts 43 50 59 and 66 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 30, and The following institutional uses are permitted through the conditional use process within the Subdistrict: 1. Churches and other places of worship. 2. Group care facilities (Categories I and II). 3. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities. - 4. Essential services as set forth in LDC Section 2.01.03. 5. Private Schools. 5282000 - 151001 V8r. 06F WERRY N� N015S011-000. POOP- 29240 6. Day care centers. district. 1. Libraries. 2. Government offices. 3. Medical offices associated with group care facilities. 4. Civic and cultural facilities. 5/0Y8 0W0-151081 Ve[051- MPERRY LNd N0155-01 1-00. POOP- 29249 LEGEND PROPOSED AMENDMENT CAM1D11 V MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMOKALEE ROAD I RANOA 30MLiwP11C ® 'NSTIMTION I v. aue"ieiueumiC < ■ coMMe cep SvemSTR, saeolsmlcr t z C e E] :GLDEX G ^� ■ Ex ® PRQF'5 LTIE aARNWnv R OR10E ■ yaPU °Pa nt � NE3'. cZi N ESTITEs �Rf W CIAL 3 CgANE0.CIPL 519015iRIC% GS z o •�jT � c'cv'A d.e?a ec»� ® TO,wE °ao Csue �salcr cr III ❑ uABnry P310ENI,e� . L0.1J aaW iZl GOMMRCI �� 3CISmIli O �.. GOWEN CPIE PARKWAY PROPOSED AMENDMENT CAM1D11 V MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMOKALEE ROAD I RANOA 30MLiwP11C ® 'NSTIMTION I OIL ELL ROAD gP vii �uRe °uari ruR iaME.upEJ - ' Z 19i �3 119 %( E R 2S E v. aue"ieiueumiC < ■ coMMe cep SvemSTR, saeolsmlcr t z DAVIS BOULEVARD^ C v1.1 uaE xeolsmlc °reRS° as 2 Ex � � NE3'. cZi N ESTITEs �Rf � GS z o •�jT � ,Nara aebls -wo I LENrcR' , SOfry naL I O �.. n cRCneNLE Y:90tr 05 OF—iGH10E.]'.N COOrvT'/ 'NIOC � r,EV9 n' 3Prv0 y _ ..._ O .. < I m � T u n us n ca m x nra a iESawmN eivS, PIJCI ES +rN x r M xCr .,w.° sA Tf al+f> n' Ere ux NAPLES IMMOKALEE ROAD m RAVDALL e�ttR°u> 3 _ n esr.ne > RpAAp N� auterrRer > COWAGAIRRrDIRTWCT 0 BEACH ROAD ; e > ; m m o GOLDEN DATE ULRVARD —_.. z d ... ... .... _.._ o< v a PIN ; AWGE RD. ; WRITB BLVD ' Y Ul C YXC MDGI ROA° 81.eMItiRICi Y Y eutvarRnT O.D.I PKWY. OIL ELL ROAD gP vii �uRe °uari ruR iaME.upEJ - ' Z 19i �3 119 %( E R 2S E v. aue"ieiueumiC < z DAVIS BOULEVARD^ C 2 � m � GS z o •�jT � v Y � 3iyy F O OIL ELL ROAD gP vii �uRe °uari ruR iaME.upEJ - ' Z 19i �3 119 %( E R 2S E EXHIBIT D ZONED: ESTATES SINGLE FAMILY UNIT 30 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES HOMES 28TH AVENUE S.W. PROJECT �T� LOCATION SINGLE FAMILY 5ppl SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPERTY HOMES ZONED: (DEVELOPED) RADIUS (DEVELOPED) ESTATES 29TH AVE S.W. PKWY' C7 DAVID SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY LAWRENCE COMM. g VACANT Z SI LE FAMILY HOMES HOMES CENTER CHURCH ¢ LL m m HOMES (DEVELOPED) DEVELOPED) OF GOD J w J (DEVELOPED) z d0 z GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (C.R. 886) SINGLE ¢ 90 LL m FAMILY w v SINGLE FAMILY U Z z �O = m HOMES Z S Y _ (DEVELOPED) (DEVELOPED) U U n s¢ w J0 YU ZONED: ��(� N Y a ESTATES a c=i SINGLE FAMILY OLL . § HOMES b yl (DEVELOPED) l. 7 ° rn ZONED: ESTATES cn Lu = o F. m U Lo y FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION = GOLDEN GATE ESTATES PROJECT: GOLDEN GATE PKWY. INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT GENERAL LOCATION MAP /FLUE DESIGNATION CLIENT: THE DAVID LAWRENCE FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC. ■ ■ .- N- L" 1. .. Wi M,ller SCALE V = 500• Bnre. 4129,05 Plw N . Engineer. EcoWisfs . Sumee��ym . Lands pe Architects . Transpmbbon Cansulfanfs SEC iwP. ROE. REV NO WilsonMillor, Inc. PROJECT NO N0155 -011 -000 INOE %NO A- 0155 -0B 3200f isyl", SuiN200. Napbs, Florida3110"97. phone 231-64&1040. Fay 239. 263 - 6494- Web-Site avw.Wwnmifkrmxn ORWN BYIEMP NO. KAC11213 SHEET NO 1 NE 1 b w a Y, OJ f A yM p i Ir \ y 1AA �u Ao IN Y f 4 i Y � y d I r ti- t i T my n�� 33y� b on n 0 ivj 2 W c 0 a OCD v G) O m v a m D n • . Pil r� N GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY A INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT pmp + W v.Pe"armowes XAM*w0 mmsmetcsso'rmap NRCS SOILS MAP EXHIBIT G Projed: GOLDEN GATE PARWMY INSTIMpfNL SUBDISTRICT Client DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER Projod t. N0155-011-000 -ZOPAS Sod. 29, Twp- 496, Rry. 26E, Carer County, Florida � w 2 / � � J G k ) { \ £ \ E § %] @§ jk] � ! §) ) < { §} © ) §/ _ LU ow /ƒ {2)22§ 00 'ok } ƒ} 22klr # 2 § /2 =eok) §\ }\ '!!!!! ' k))))) �0 C a X } \ }E» ;! \ }\ \ }} \} J2 ;$) ))) z ca "m k„#z■ myw �,z #® a Go « §_ ¥ 77 -Z -Z © www �ww IL j� | )k _ z |§ _ § �! �� kk kk. _ - ° \00 _ ;E�� % )2$ §E � :3 as co \w z - } } }\)\ !, E § %] @§ jk] � ! §) ) < { §} © ) §/ _ LU ow /ƒ {2)22§ 00 'ok } ƒ} 22klr # 2 § /2 =eok) §\ }\ Exhibit - 1-111 Listed Species Survey — Log of Time Spent On Site Date Hours Conditions 5/22/2006 6:45 am — 10:45 am Cloudy, 700 F. Calm winds 5/23/2006 4:00 prn — 8:00 prn Cloudy, 87° F, Winds 0 - 5 mph 5/24/2006 6:30 am —10:00 am Part[ cloud , 72° F, Winds 0 - 5 mph 5/25/2006 4:00 m — 8:00 prn Partly cloudy, 88° F, Winds 5 -10 mph 5/26/2006 6:35 am —10:05 am Cloudy, 80° F, Calm winds Total Hours 19.2 WilsonMiller ecologist Curt Schaeffer performed a listed species survey on the subject property from May 22 through May 26, 2006. Prior to field investigations, color aerials were reviewed to identify the various vegetative communities present on the site. Based on the vegetative habitats identified and a literatures search, a preliminary list of state and federally listed flora and fauna that have the potential to occur on the site was determined. Exhibit H contains the preliminary list of listed plants and animals that have the potential to occur on the site. Meandering pedestrian transects were performed throughout the property searching for listed flora and fauna. The field ecologist was equipped with binoculars, compass, aerials, wildlife and plant identification books, and field notebooks for documentary purposes. During transects, the ecologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations and sounds. These survey methodologies were consistent with those prescribed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC 1988 Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval. FWC. Tallahassee, FL). FWC's publication Florida's Endangered Species Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern 29 January 2004 was used to determine the current state and federal status of listed wildlife and plant species. 9]0QM 170168 V.,'. 021 -TKI G No,sSOn 001 - -0 wvo;lte Aft; °C e�Tq it -•'I 1 1 t i ,Or 71 i I +a x 'tl 1 { 9% 1� 4, I Y n w' ' F Gy i k e r �k(k `3 0 j y�r ti u t:. R- �. �j i s � �y � /t FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES April 12, 2005 Toni King WilsouMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane Naples, FL 34105 FAX #: 239- 643 -5716 EXHIBIT I Dear Ms. King: In response to your inquiry of April 11, 2005, the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources within the following parcel: T49S R26E, Section 29. In interpreting the results of our search, please remember the following points: Areas which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, unrecorded historically important structures, or both. As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance Review Section of the Bureau of Historic Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this address. Sincerely, Wm. Gerald L, Brinkley Archaeological Data Analyst, Florida Master Site File Division of Historical Resources R A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 Phone 850- 245 -6440, Fax: 850- 245 -6439 State SunCom: 205 -6440 Email: fnsfile@ dos.state fl.us Web: http: / /Www.dos_state fl.usldhrlmsfl 500 S. Bronough Street a Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 . http: / /www.Hheritage,com O Director's Office D Archaeologieai Research 0 Historic Preservation 0 Historical Museums (650) 245.6300' FAX: 245-6W (850) 2456444 • FAX; 245.6436 (850) 74543M • FAX: 245 -6437 (850) 2456400 • FAX: 2454433 ^ -`— n - -,h Re®.onal Office D St. Aagustlne Regional Office D Tampa Regional Office '-^^ ^^c -antF • FAX 8255044 (813) 2723843 • FAX: 272 -2340 P.e1 EXHIBIT J nATI nn I INDICATES HISTORIC STRUCTURE (NOT TO SCALE) INDICATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) L� INDICATES HISTORIC DISTRICT wm..ov �nLn town cwxn uxo wxo[ wxwxo ooumurt TWP 49 FW-P4 9 1" :4300' P 49 P 50 BELLE MEADE NW QUADRANGLE AREAS OF HISTORIU /ARruAEQTAQ CA PROBABI ITY O EXHIBIT K GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES As this application does not modify the existing zoning of the parcels, there are no additional impacts to the Level of Service (LOS) for potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, or parks associated with this application. Due to the relatively small size of the proposed subdistrict and the fact that a majority of the area is currently developed, any future development or changes to the zoning of the properties are anticipated to have minimal impacts on public facilities. Services The properties are within the Florida Government Utility Authority (FGUA) water and wastewater service area. See copy of request for availability of service letter to FGUA and utility location map. Solid Waste services are provided by Waste Management, Inc. See copy of request for availability of service letter to Waste Management. As this application proposes no increase in residential density, no additional demands for schools or community /regional parks are anticipated. Any future development or changes to the zoning of the properties are anticipated to have minimal impacts on fire protection or emergency medical services. Drainage The proposed subdistrict is in Flood Zone X, see FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map. There are no known drainage problems associated with the property and any future development will comply with the current Collier County ordinances. Other The project is not in the vicinity of any well fields, High Noise Contours, the traffic congestion boundary, or the Coastal Management Boundary. The applicant intends to commence built -out construction immediately upon issuance of the necessary permits. k202 1SM92 Ve1'. 021 JSRd N C. N015S011 -000. -0 Impacts to Level of Service for County provided public facilities Category Existing LOS Impact from this Application Potable Water 185 gal. per capita per day None, not in Collier County Service Area Sanitary Sewer 100 gal. per capita per day None, not in Collier County Service Area Drainage water quantity and quality standards None as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74 -50 and 90 -10. Solid Waste Two years of lined cell capacity None. Service Provider is reflecting the ISWM strategy; Collier County Solid Waste proposed methodology of average Management tons per capita disposal rate of the previous 3 years Ten years of permissible landfill reflecting ISWM strategy; proposed methodology of average tons per capita disposal rate of the previous 3 ears. Regional Parks 2.9412 acres per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density Community Parks 1.2882 acres per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density Recreational Facilities $240.00 capital investment per capita None, no increase in residential density County Jail 2.4 beds per 1,000 /pop. None, no increase in residential density County Emergency 1 EMS unit per 15,000 /pop. None, no increase in Medical Service residential density Y2&2 158992 Ver 021 -JBRW N015S911 -006 -0 • M W +t cam f' W u ' 9 a i i l 2 ^i v � � F. l W Cu yy P u .t Y �.a eK PROJECT: GOLDEN GATE PKWY. INSTITUTIONAL SUBDISTRICT UTILITIES LOCATION EXHIBIT NT: DAVID LAWRENCE FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH, INC. WilsonMFiler EXHIBIT M sw E. 1" = 200' DATE 04/18/05 fiBlIRPlB • `.p^......" • [YVbph • %rvvym • Land9('9e ArdiNecle • T /B11w0Habo 1 r.MAW&b SEC'. -p: RGE: RE NO 29 49 26E Krdsor, oer, Inc. ROJECT NO, INOE% NO VIpNIIl6I Mrt. N0155 -011 -000 A- 0155 -09 .4i(M)ibiw Wr.Oi aYl. IWNw FWi'X .'NKS ASD %. iMM %19- E�AONI F!?N iKN�AlI' WM -.9'M WYWYtYnlir(YY11 DRWN RY/EI NO. /.. SHEET I .. July 5, 2006 u Jared R. Brown e 'g Wilson Miller FLORIDA 3200 Bailey ane, Suite 200 GOVERNMENTAL y UTILITY AUTHORITY Naples, FL 34105 -8507 RE: review for David Lawerence Center, Center and Church, Golden Gate, Collier County LEA ANN THOMAS, CHAIR Dear: Mr. Brown Polk County This letter confirms that the referenced property lies within the Florida RICHARD W. WESCH Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) service area and, the FGUA will be the Citrus county Water and Wastewater utility provider for the site. BRIAN WHEELER Plan review is required for all commercial projects or those projects involving Osceola county a main extension. Construction shall meet FGUA's Standards and JIM LAVENDER Specifications. The design, permitting, construction and expense of the Lee County extension are the responsibility of the developer /contractor. When you are ready to proceed, submit four sets of signed /sealed engineering plans for review. Provide one copy of the FDEP.HRS permit applications (if applicable) via email or fax. FGUA will "red -line" the Operating Utility information, and return, for you to incorporate onto the Applications. You should then provide the number of completed, signed /sealed original applications you require, plus one for our files Fees are to be paid prior to plan approval and will be based on the following: Plan review fee: $300.00, plus $25.00 per sheet for plans over 9 sheets. Inspection fee: 1.5% of the construction costs for the new facility based on Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (EOPCC). The EOPCC MUST be provided at the time of your submittal. Capacity fee: Water - One ERC = 350 GPD. One ERC = $1,950.00 Wastewater - One ERC = 350 GPD. One ERC = $1,525.00 The FGUA stands ready to serve upon the acceptance of a signed Request for Service and Executed Service Agreement, payment of appropriate fees and charges, and the approval of all State and Local Regulatory Agencies, as required. Sincerely,OQ� FGUA OPERATIONS OFFICE Government Services Group, Inc. Protegrity Plaza, Suite 203 Steve Bertella 280 Wekiva Springs Road Engineering Technician Longwood FL 32779 sbertella @govmserv.com 877/552 -3482 Toll Free 407/629 -6900 Tel C: Clara S. Dozier 407/629 -6963 Fax Development Specialist FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR SERVICE EXTENSION Name and address of person or entity making application for service: David Lawrence Center 6075 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 Parkway Community Church of God 5975 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 2. Applicant is a(n): ❑ Individual ® Corporation (not for prom) ❑ Limited Partnership ® Trust Other: 3. Service requested: ® Water ® Wastewater ❑ Other 4. Project name, phases, and estimated date(s) service is required: Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Engineer's estimate of average daily flows on an annual basis: Ew.stina: Water: 14.439 GPD Wastewater: 14.439 GPD Proposed: Water. 25.996 GPD Wastewater: 25.996 GPD ❑ Partnership ❑ Political Entity Other: (reclaimed irrigation water — or Potable irrigation water) N/A 6. Legal description of property and Property ID (Strap No.): (a separate sheet may be attached) Tracts 43, 50, 59, and 66, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 38163640007, 38164200006, 38165120004, 38165640005 7. Attach a location/viainity, map Signed: d�r Date: llz 0 % Name: :4)j di a' �' S�i �ucc, d Telephone: 2.3 Title: d' t= U Email Address: 14 V 4P Ac Ke /4 e . 4o a-1 May 26, 2006 Mr. Bill Focht Florida Government Utility Authority 12355 Collier Boulevard Suite C Naples, FL 34116 Subject: David Lawrence Center— Expansion of Existing Facilities Water and Wastewater Service Availability Request Dear Mr. Focht: This letter is to follow up on our conversations earlier in the week regarding our request for a letter of availability for water and wastewater for the proposed project. It is our understanding that you have forwarded our request on to your Orlando office and will forward their response upon receipt. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Wilso filler, Inc. Jare 13-row n, P.E. Project Manager Enc. C: Scott Geltemeyer, David Lawrence Center, w/o enclosures Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 NaPlmYrAwitarale OOlee 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 - Mples, Horida 34105 • 239 649 4040 • Far 239 643 5716 vrnaoa nom v: on. LMMRN wilsoamillar com Hmsso++000- -o W / /sonMil /er, Inv. — FL L /c./ LFCg00170 Wils¢nmiller New Dimlions In Planning, Design 6 Engineering EXHIBIT N April 14, 2005 Ms. Lisa Tomasch Florida Government Utility Authority 12355 Collier Boulevard Suite C Naples, FL 34116 Subject: David Lawrence Center— Expansion of Existing Facilities Water and Wastewater Service Availability Request Dear Ms. Tomasch: This is to request a letter of availability for water and wastewater pertaining to the proposed project. One copy of the location map and site map has been enclosed for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Jared K Blown, P.E. Project Manager Enc. C: Scott Geftemeyer, David Lawrence Center, w/o enclosures Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 NaplesCorporate Office 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 • Napies, Florida 34105 • 239 649 4040 • Fax 239.643.5716 utamos.,eoaer va oil. M N wllsonmllfercom N01ss011-0oa -a EXHIBIT Q Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Statement BACKGROUND The intent of the Growth Management Plan Amendment is to permit the future expansion of both the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God, provide flexibility for future use of the property, and at the same time provide compliance with current LDC requirements for the preservation of native vegetation and for the treatment and storage of stormwater on the site(s). Because a substantial portion of the vacant 5 acre site (on the east side of the church site and owned by the David Lawrence Center) will be used for the preservation of native vegetation and stormwater management, the applicant has estimated that the net increase in building area associated with this request will be approximately 20,000 square feet of clinical /office /institutional space, located either on the existing David Lawrence Center site, on the vacant tract, on the church property, or partially on portions of the property. Since this is a Growth Management Plan Amendment to add a "subdistrict" to the existing Plan, specific to these parcels, the change being requested, by itself does not modify the underlying (existing) zoning of the tract(s) and therefore does not create any additional traffic impact. The Plan Amendment will allow for a future rezoning (or conditional use) application to entitle the vacant 5 -acre tract with appropriate uses. At that time, and at subsequent site development application stages of the review process, more detailed traffic impact analysis will be required. As part of this GMP Amendment application, a trip generation comparison of the existing zoning and the proposed land use (increase floor area) is provided below as a measure of the GMP Amendment's impact on the adjacent roadway system. The subject parcels are not within the Traffic Congestion Boundary area as identified on the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Map. LEVEL OF SERVICE The subject site is directly adjacent to the segment of Golden Gate Parkway identified in the 2004 Annual Update and Inventory report (AUIR) from 1 -75 to Santa Barbara, as having an adopted Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard of "E ". In 2004, the peak hour capacity of the facility (with a 6- lanes) was rated at 3,730 with a current volume of 2070, yielding an operating LOS of "C ". TRIP GENERATION The existing developed tracts occupied by the David Lawrence Center and the Parkway Community Church of God are established by Conditional Use approval and can expand within the limits of their existing approved zoning. Land taken for the expansion of Golden Gate Parkway and /or the 1 -75 Interchange, have reduced the net usable land area of the parcels and have eliminated native vegetation areas previously counted toward the minimum requirements for the site. Establishing a GMP subdistrict for the existing developed parcels plus an additional +/- 5 -acre adjacent parcel will allow for the recovery of native vegetation (lost to the new roadway projects) plus provide for needed stormwater management areas for the site(s). Absent any change in the GMP and zoning on the additional two -acre site, two single - family homes could be constructed on the parcel. Two single - family homes will generate approximately 2 p.m. peak hour trips on the adjacent roadways. Assuming a 20,000 square foot expansion of the David Lawrence Center, the ITE Trip Generation Handbook indicates that approximately 35 p.m. peak hour trips would be generated for a LU #715 Single Use Tenant Office Building. The types of professional services that would generally be in a separate building located on the additional tract would most likely be administrative office or similar institutional use. Assuming a 60/40 split of the trips, by west/east direction, the resulting p.m. peak hour traffic impact of the additional floor area described above would be considered de minimis, and would have no impact on the operational LOS of Golden Gate Parkway. As currently permitted, the Church may expand in the future within the limits of their existing zoning (or as may be modified in a subsequent zoning application), and therefore there is no additional impact being generated by this GMP amendment. ACCESS MANAGEMENT No special access management considerations are being requested as part of this GMP Amendment. This amendment does not preclude the potential for cross - access agreements that would facilitate the sharing of existing or potentially future access points, thus improving access and site circulation. Pursuant to the Land Development Code, access management issues will be dealt with as part of any subsequent SDP application. Agenda Item 4J Co er Co-r.,.-i -tty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2007 RE: PETITION NO. CP- 2005 -09, CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNERS: Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, P.A 4001 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP O. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Applicant and Owner: Robert E. Williams 1580 East 40'h Terrace SW Naples, FL 34116 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property contains approximately 8.0 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Platt Road. The property has approximately 630 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road and 553 feet of frontage on Platt Road. The property lies within the Corkscrew Planning Community in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, in Collier County, Florida. (See Attachment "A ") - 1 - Agenda Item 4J REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to [change the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District designation in order to] establish the Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict for a 90,000 square foot, 8.0 acre retail, office & personal service development in Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands. The proposed text change adds new Subdistrict language in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District [showing the petitioner's proposed amendments in strike - through /underline format, while current Growth Management Plan language appears in plain text] as follows: Proposed Future Land Use Element Text Amendment: [page ? ?] B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District – Neutral Lands ? ?. Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a neighborhood level commercial land uses in an Predominantly rural in nature, and the growing population has largely -een required to obtain Collier County recognizes the resulting benefits to the local infrastructure when appropriately [Staff Note: The contention that this area of Collier County is experigucing- a'7apidty - - -- increasing population" may not be supported by application materials. Staff analysis below addresses this idea in more detail.] PURPOSE / DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this project is to establish the "Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial– Subdistrict" so as to accommodate a future rezone to allow commerciaLdevelopment. -_ -_The petitioner proposes to provide a maximum of 90,000 square feet for office, retail, andpersolrat services typically found in the C -2, Commercial Convenience zoning district. 5M Agenda Item 4J SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: The subject property is currently vacant and zoned C -2, Commercial Convenience District (easterly 3.25 acre portion), and MH, Mobile Home District - RFMUO, Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District, Neutral Lands (westerly 4.75 acre portion). A gas station/restaurant previously occupied the site closest to Immokalee Road. Mobile homes once stood on the westernmost portion of the property. A treatment pond was excavated likely for use by both mobile home residents and the business. It is now silted in. The property is currently (temporarily) being utilized as parking and some staging for the Immokalee Road expansion project. The current Future Land Use Designation is Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands. Surrounding Lands: N - ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural - MHO, Mobile Home Overlay District - RFMUO, Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District, Neutral Lands DESCRIPTION: Undeveloped, Vacant & Residential Land Uses. A fire station lies approximately one -half mile to the northeast of the subject property. FLUM DESIGNATION: Agricultural /Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands S- ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural - RFMUO, Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District, Neutral Lands DESCRIPTION: Across Platt Road (an unpaved two -lane roadway), Undeveloped, Vacant & Residential Land Uses FLUM DESIGNATION: Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands; Receiving Lands, beyond E - ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural - RFMUO, Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District DESCRIPTION: Across Immokalee Road, Undeveloped, Vacant & Residential Land Uses FLUM DESIGNATION: Agricultural /Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands W - ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural - MHO, Mobile Home Overlay District DESCRIPTION: Undeveloped, Vacant & Residential Land Uses. Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, a privately -owned conservation area, lies approximately one- - half mile to the west. -3- Agenda Item 4J FLUM DESIGNATION: Agricultural /Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands. Conservation Designation, with CREW NRPA (Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed Natural Resource Protection Area) lying approximately one -half mile to the west (Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary). STAFF ANALYSIS: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DATA AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue... the Department will review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the consistency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. The entire subject property — 3.25 acres zoned C -2, Commercial Convenience District and 4.75 acres zoned MH, Mobile Home District — is recognized as one of the County's properties consistent by policy, and identified on MAP FLUE -15 as, "Existing Zoning Consistent with FLUE by Policy 5.9, 5.10, 5.11 [and] 5.12 ". Though the zoning on the subject property is not consistent with the Future Land Use Designation, Description Section (Designations: Districts and Subdistricts), these policies allow the property to be developed as zoned. Permanency of Boundary of "Corkscrew Island Neiahborhood Commercial Subdistrict" if the requested amendment to the RFMU Neutral Lands is granted: The granting of this amendment would create a rectangular Commercial Subdistrict boundary in the northwest quadrant of this intersection. This rectangular boundary would be surrounded with rural density residential lots or structures. It is likely approval of this amendment will im Agenda Item 4J encourage future requests for amendments to allow commercial development on the other three quadrants of this Immokalee Road/Platt Road intersection. The granting of this amendment could have negative impacts upon the existing adjoining and nearby single - family residential development to all directions from the subject property. Environmental Impacts: The petitioner prepared an Environmental Assessment which was submitted with this petition. The fine sand soils underlying the property are described as "poorly drained" and "nearly level" consistent with Pine Flatwoods. The man -made structures and past uses have altered the natural habitat to the extent it no longer supports any listed species typically found there. It is likely that wildlife would normally traverse or migrate through an area consistent with their habitat, while it is less likely the same species would use a disturbed property to move from one area of habitat to another. Environmental review specialists with the Collier County Environmental Services reviewed the environmental assessment and provided the following comment: Environmental Services staff finds no significant issues on this site, and does not recommend additional environmental conditions. Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Analysis: The petitioner /agent prepared a Traffic Impact Statement which was submitted with this petition. The content of the TIS did not include the analyses typically provided in a Growth Management Plan Amendment application. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Immokalee Road and Platt Road and proposes 90,000 square feet of office and retail space. The commercial activities would produce 3,880 daily gross new trips (2 -way) and 421 PM Peak Hour gross new trips. Although the property has been abandoned, the buildings razed, and commercial activities and mobile homes are no longer present, TIS Trip Generation calculations are compared to existing uses. Traffic generated [by these absent] existing uses is estimated to be 2,509 daily gross trips (2- way) and 298 PM Peak Hour gross trips. This comparison results in a positive trip generation of 1,371 daily net trips (2 -way) and 123 PM Peak Hour net trips. [3,880 — 2509 = 1,371 daily, and 421 — 298 = 123 peak hour trips] TIS findings conclude that the impact of project traffic volumes on the roadway network surrounding the project site is not significant. "Significant impact" is defined in Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Policy 1.1.2 as any amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that will generate a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 3% of the LOS of the impacted roadway. Staff notes that recently- approved EAR -based amendments to CIE Policy 1.1.2 reduced this LOS "significant impact' standard from 3% to 2% (and are not yet in effect). This change occurred afterthe Transportation staff initially reviewed this Transportation Impact — Statement and commented. M.IM Agenda Item 4J The Collier County Transportation Planning Department reviewed the traffic statement and provided the following comment: "Though we [the Transportation Planning specialists] did not receive a traffic analysis with this [petition], based on the size of the development and the remaining capacity on Immokalee Road this project appears to be consistent with the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Access points, turn lanes and other transportation issues will be addressed when we get further detail on the project at a future development stage." This situation poses a more immediate concern. Without validation by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department of a full traffic analysis, the exact impact on roadways has not been ascertained with absolute certainty. Other factors must be considered. CP -05 -09 is not the only GMP amendment proposed where commercial development introduces unplanned traffic onto Immokalee Road. This is not the only traffic analysis affected by EAR -based amendments reducing the LOS "significant impact" standard from 3% to 2 %. Therefore, a comprehensive traffic analysis should be prepared, comparing old CIE provisions to new, fully addressing capacity and circulation issues. Its complete review and validation affirmed and reported by the proper staff is necessary to provide the certainty desired. Staff believes immediate consideration should be given to requiring an upgraded TIS be provided by the petitioner. Subsequently, another review by specialists with the Collier County Transportation Planning Department should take place before the CCPC proceeds with a recommendation. Reconsideration should be given to the vague conclusion offered in the TIS Discussion, stating "[a]II segments will operate at [an acceptable] LOS Standard or better. All segments will also have excess peak hour capacity greater than the projected trip generation for the subject property ". It does reflect the comprehensive analysis desired for a Growth Management Plan amendment. Public Facilities Impact The petitioner prepared a Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis which was submitted with this petition. Application materials provided no water demand figure. No sewer capacity figure provided. The Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict property is not in the Collier County Water & Sewer District. Potable water and sanitary sewer services will not be provided by the District's systems. This project would not impact the County's existing Level of Service Standards (LOSS). Development would use a private water well and on -site treatment system.. An on -site system with a capacity exceeding 5,000 gpd requires Florida Department of Environmental protection (FDEP) approval. The fine sand soils underlying the property are described in this petition's Environmental Assessment as "poorly drained" and "nearly level ". These soil characteristics will make finding a suitable site for a septic system here difficult - particularly one designed to serve 90,000 square feet of gross leasable building area accommodating an array of commercial uses. Public facilities other than roads, potable water and sanitary sewer (drainage, solid waste), will not impose a "significant" impact (generating potential for increased County -wide population M Agenda Item 4J greater than 3% of the BEBR high range population projections, as defined in Policy 1.1.2 of the CIE and other applicable Growth Management Plan Elements). However, for some public facilities, such as park facilities, the impacts will be lessened since this is not a residential project. Facilities review specialists with the Collier County Public Utilities Services reviewed the Analysis and provided the following comment: Public Utilities Staff finds no significant issues on this site, and does not recommend additional public facilities - related conditions. Appropriateness of Change: The practicality of the petitioner's proposed Subdistrict is to be established through an evaluation of population growth and infrastructure development in the surrounding areas to ascertain sufficient need for the proposed land use. There does not appear to be adequate, relevant or appropriate data and analysis in the form or content of the petition's market analysis as reflected by staff evaluation comments below. It is premature to designate eight acres for entirely unplanned commercial development through a piecemeal approach before the comprehensive East of 951 Study is completed. In staff's opinion, approval of this amendment may result in nearby properties seeking higher densities, or non - residential uses, for compatibility purposes. Commercial Development There is no trend toward commercial development immediately surrounding the proposed commercial Subdistrict. But at a more - distant 3.5 to 6.0 mile radius from the proposed Subdistrict commercial land uses are evident, as follows: ♦ 2 PUDs in the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict [5.5 to 6.0 miles away] ♦ Orangetree PUD (22 acres of commercial, with a pending zoning petition to increase this to 34 acres and more than 300,000 sq. ft.) [4.5 to 5.0 miles away] ♦ Immokalee Road - Everglades Boulevard Neighborhood Center (9.2 acres) [3.5 + miles away] ♦ Orange Blossom Ranch PUD [6.0 + miles away] 'Neighborhood Centers' and 'Commercial Subdistricts', and the 'bested" Rural Settlement Area District (Orangetree and Orange Blossom Ranch PUDs), are components of the Future Land Use Element and Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan. Commercial Demand Analysis: The petitioner prepared a Market Conditions Analysis analyzing market conditions within the Rural Estates and Corkscrew Planning Community Districts (PCDs). These two areas begin along northerly County boundaries at the northwest, north and northeast, then District boundaries turn south to run along Oil Well Road, then turn south again approximately two miles 7- Agenda Item 4J equidistantly east of Everglades Boulevard to 1 -75, west to Collier Boulevard, then north to complete the boundary — nearly all the developable land outside the Immokalee urban planning area and Naples urban and urban fringe planning areas. The population and trade area studied extends to approximately a three mile radius. The primary market area studied runs east to Everglades Boulevard and south to Randall Boulevard. The market area to the west and north is constrained by the proximity of Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. The findings of the [updated] study materials are as follows: • Growth in northern Collier County is projected to nearly double the population of the Rural Estates Planning Community District (PCD) during the period 2005 to 2015. This "Rural Estates" area is projected to grow from 33,940 persons in 2005 to 65,345 persons in 2015 an increase of 31,405 persons; The "Corkscrew" area is projected to nearly triple, growing from 1,936 persons in 2005 to 5,616 persons in 2015 an increase of 3,680 persons, according to October, 2005 estimates provided by the County's Comprehensive Planning Section. • The nearby planned developments of the Orangetree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD include commercial components totaling approximately 70 acres. However, many of the proposed commercial land uses are designed to serve a larger geographic area (including personnel related to Ave Maria University and area schools) than the proposed Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict. • Further, the market - conditions study utilized land -use inventory data from the 2005 Collier County Commercial Land Use Inventory to document the need for new commercial facilities near the subject property. The inventory demonstrated approximately 160 acres are currently zoned for commercial land use development, leaving a deficit of about 280 acres [within the entire Rural Estates and Corkscrew PCDs, not the 3 -mile trade area]. In conclusion, the study reports that the GMP "does not provide alternative opportunities for neighborhood commercial uses in the study area ". The Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict will satisfy a growing demand for goods and services. It is "well located to serve the population with direct access to Immokalee Road, and without negative impacts to any nearby residential properties ". The petitioner has not provided data and analysis supporting their concluding claims stated above, particularly those referring to opportunities and impacts. Quite the opposite is more likely to be closer to fact than these claims. Numerous commercial development opportunities are provided, including pre -zoned commercial land yet undeveloped, Mixed Use Activity Centers, commercial subdistricts and neighborhood centers already existing or planned in the Golden Gate Estates area, and the commercial components of Rural Villages (a total of four are allowed in RFMUD Receiving Lands, including one about a mile to the South - southeast of the subject property); Depending on a final design, direct access onto Immokalee Road may prove to be problematic, and; no information is provided to substantiate that the proposal is without some negative impact to residential neighbors, present and future. It should be noted that growth has trended downward since the growth projections used in the analysis were prepared. The population figures are no longer valid based on change in 2006 to Agenda Item 4J 2007 market conditions. Further, much of the referenced growth projected lies outside the 3- mile trade area. The population projection methodology used in the CIE has been revised from using high -range BEBR figures to medium -range (in the adopted but not yet in effect EAR -based GMP amendments). Staff also notes that it is likely that new residential construction is being further affected by delays with expanding the area's roadway network, lessening the demand for commercial centers providing for the personal service, retail and office needs of future residents. Certain land uses permitted within RFMU Receiving Lands are not authorized in Neutral Lands [particularly commercial development]. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use, Neutral Lands provisions limit allowable uses to those appropriate for limited, semi -rural residential development, as follows: • Agricultural land uses, including farm labor housing • Detached single - family residences, including mobile homes where a Zoning Overlay exists • Multi- family residential units, when clustered • Group homes • Golf courses and driving ranges • Botanical gardens, zoos, and aquariums • Public and private schools • Community facilities, such as cemeteries, places of worship, childcare facilities • Habitat preservation and conservation areas, including incidental staff housing • Parks, open space, and recreational uses • Sporting and recreational camps • Essential services • Earthmining, oil extraction and processing Other Considerations: • The approval of commercial development or other non - residential uses where none is planned is directly inconsistent with the creation and purpose of the RFMUD Neutral Lands. • The development of Rural Villages is expected and encouraged in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use (RFMU) District, Receiving Lands, which are required to include a commercial component that could meet some commercial demand derived from semi -rural areas surrounding them. One such Rural Village may develop as close as one mile from the subject property. A second, pending Rural Village is the Immokalee Road South PUD located about eight road miles to the southwest of the subject property, on the south side of Immokalee Road. • The East of County Road 951 Studv. This study, presently underway, is examining infrastructure and land use issues and needs, including commercial land, and providing an overall calculation of land use needs within the area of Collier County, east of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard). It is most likely premature to designate the subject property commercial before the East of 951 Study is completed. Agenda Item 4J Neighborhood Information Meeting Svnoosis The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was conducted January 24, 2007, after the agent/applicant duly noticed and advertised the meeting. 25 people attended the NIM, held in the Oakridge Middle School cafeteria, and heard the following information: The subject property currently lies in two different zoning districts — with the front half being zoned for commercial uses, while the back half is zoned for a mobile home park. People familiar with the property know it as the 'Wagon Wheel ", for the business once located here. Petitioners have recently presented information to the Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Organization about this proposal. Most discussion surrounded traffic concerns, as the subject property is located along a (90 degree) bend in Immokalee Road. Attendees voiced their concern about large truck traffic especially, as these trucks round this curve at speed, and sight distances would be dangerously short. Petitioner explained that addressing these problems would likely include providing turn lanes out front, on Immokalee Road. Traffic concerns may also be minimized by aligning the commercial entrance with the (Platt Road) street intersection across Immokalee Road. [Synopsis prepared by L Koehler, Public Information Coordinator, and C. Schmidt, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • Based upon total existing commercial inventory in the market study area, staff recognizes there is a need for commercial uses to serve the surrounding communities, but not necessarily at this specific location. • The magnitude and scale of this project (90,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area of C- 2 uses) is similar to neighborhood commercial development in the high range of size. As a result of this amendment there are no significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the CIE, with respect to Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater Drainage and Solid Waste facilities. However, during subsequent rezone petition review if this project is approved, the Transportation Planning Department will be requested to ascertain whether the impacted roadways are projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service within the five -year planning period. • The subject property abuts one principal arterial roadway - Immokalee Road, and one local, unpaved dead -end roadway — Platt Road. - to - Agenda Item 41 • The proposed expansion of Immokalee Road (presently a two -lane road under reconstruction, scheduled to be a six -lane facility by mid -2007, extending west to US -41 and east to 43`d Street, with future plans to extend even further east) has yet to accommodate increasing traffic demands. The adjacent roadway is not expected to experience improvements for more than five years. • Certain land uses are not authorized in RFMUD, Neutral Lands — particularly commercial development — as they are not appropriate for or compatible with limited, semi -rural residential development. • Approval of this petition is likely to lead to other requests for increased density, or non- residential uses, on nearby properties. • The Rural Villages expected and encouraged in RFMUD, Receiving Lands include a commercial component; these could meet some commercial demand, thereby reducing the amount of commercial land speculation in rural areas. • The existing zoning on the site and/or uses allowed by the RFMUD Neutral Lands designation presently allow uses that appear to be viable. • The East of 951 Study is presently underway, examining infrastructure and land use issues and needs, including commercial land. Designating the subject property commercial before the East of 951 Study is completed is premature. Staff concludes the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment may adequately support additional commercial development somewhere in the market study area. Staff also concludes however, that the data and analysis does not support it at this specific location. The petition is most likely premature and out of scale with regard to anticipated future commercial needs in the RFMUD. The need for commercial land uses in this geographic area cannot be adequately ascertained at this time, and until Rural Villages in RFMUD Receiving Lands have been submitted for review and approved. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP- 2005 -09 to the BCC with a recommendation not to transmit to the Florida Department of Community of Affairs for the reasons stated above. However, if the Planning Commission determines that a recommendation of approval is warranted, staff recommends not adding this subdistrict to the RFMUD, rather removing the site from RFMUD and placing it under the Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District, and adding this proposed subdistrict there. Further, staff recommends modifications to the proposed language, noted below in double strike - through/double underline format, as follows: _»_ Agenda Item 4J Prepared By: Date: tp Corby L. S hmidt, Principal Planner Comprehe sive Planning Department Reviewed By: ^ W Date: - 1-0 0-7 David C. Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: Date: 2.- Ra dall J. f-- en, AICP, Director �yComprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: / / 1�� + ,; i� 1 • /l,C ✓�, 4 - �c Date: 2 - Ze - ux Map ie M. Stud nt- Stirling �- Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney Approved By:� Date: so A9 Jo 1ph K. Schmitt, Administrator C mmunity Development and Environmental Services Division PETITION NO.: CP- 2005 -09 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007 CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007 BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, Chairman Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Civil Engineers ■ Land Surveyors ■ Planners MARK W. MINOR, P.E. AORMAN J. TREBILCOCK, A.LC.P., P.E. C. DEAN SMITH, P.E. DAVID W. SCHMITT, P.E. April 21, 2005 MICHAEL J. DELATE, P.E. MICHAEL T. HERRERA, P.E. WILSON A. GARCIA, P.E. Mr. David Weeks Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application — Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Dear Mr. Weeks: D. WAYNE ARNOLD, A.I.C.P. ROBERT -BOB- THINNES, A,LC.P. THOMAS J. GARRIS, P.S.M. STEPHEN V. BURGESS, P.S.M. ALAN V. ROSEMAN JEFFREY S. CURL, ASLA, RLA IVY WYLIE, P.E. Enclosed, please find attached the original and 5 copies of the application to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The application proposes to amend the future land use map designation and text to create a new subdistrict designation in the Future Land Use Element for approximately 8f acres of property located on Immokalee Road in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East. The subject property is generally located 3.5 miles north of Oil Well Road and is situated at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Platt Road and Immokalee Road. Presently the property is zoned C- 2, Commercial Convenience, and MH, Mobile Home. The property is presently designated Rural Fringe Mixed -Use — Neutral Lands on the Future Land Use Map. The Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Subdistrict Land Use Designation proposes to permit neighborhood level commercial uses on the 8t acre property primarily to serve the needs of the growing population in this area of northeastern Collier County. We believe that the proposed subdistrict is well located to serve the growing population base in the area, and to capture a significant number of vehicular trips presently utilizing Immokalee Road to travel several miles to obtain their goods and services. Collier County population data and traffic counts well document the growth that has occurred and is anticipated to continue in this region of Collier County. Please contact either Richard Yovanovich at 435 -3535 or me if there are any questions. Very truly yours, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP cc: Bob Williams Richard Yovanovich (239) 947 -1144 ■ FAX (239) 947 -0375 ■ E -Mail: engineering®gradyminor.com 3800 Via Del Rey ■ Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 -7569 ■ EB /LB 0005151 F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA ( BWGMPA ) \CORRESPONDENCE\DW5042ILdm B WGMPA APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] DATE RECEIVED This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (941)403 -2300; Fax: (941)643 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941 - 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Robert E. Williams Company Mailing Address 1580 East 401" Terrace SW City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239- 455 -1024 Fax Number B. Name of Agent *Rich Yovanovich * THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company/Firm Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson P.A. Mailing Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239435 -3535 Fax Number 239435 -1218 02/2002 Email Address aovanovich@gci1aw.com C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Robert E. Williams Mailing Address 1580 East 40th Terrace SW City Naples State FL Zip Code 34116 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Robert E. Williams 100% 1580 East 40 ' Terrace SW _ Naples, Florida 34116 B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 2 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSIIIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PUI2CIIASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (1999) leased (): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates:_, or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 IIl. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description Please see attached Exhibit III -A B. Section: 27 Township: 47 Range: 27 C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 00113120107 and 00111240005 D. General Location Approximately 3 miles north of Oil Well Road on Immokalee Road. The northwest corner of Platt Road and hmnokalee Road E. Planning Community Corkscrew F.TAZ 199 G. Size in Acres 8f 11. Zoning C -2 and MH with RFMU Overlay I. Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Agricultural/Rural Rural Fringe Mixed Use District - neutral IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: ✓ Future Land Use Immokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage Golden Gate Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) N/A of the N/A Element As Follows: (Use Cress- threaghs to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please see attached newly proposed Future Land Use Element text - Exhibit I V B C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, .Ou Subdistrict TO: Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict District, Subdistrict [If new District and/or Sub- district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) 02/2002 E. Describe additional changes requested: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8'/ x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. X Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. X Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. X Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. X Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL I. X Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT - FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. X Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) 3. X Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. - Provide copy of County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. NO Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- lL006(1)(a)7.a,F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed 5 02/2002 Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. _ NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. NO_ Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. YES Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district /subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district /subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5)F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. X Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) N/A Potable Water— Property served by Well b) N/A Sanitary Sewer — Property served by Septic c) X Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS Immokalee Road Please refer to exhibit V.E.1c — Traffic Impact Statement d) X Drainage e) X Solid Waste I) N/A Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. X Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools, and emergency medical services. 3. X Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. 6 02/2002 F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. D Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). (Community Number 120067, Panel Number 250D June 3 1986). 2. N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. 4. TWA Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. X $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. $9,000.00 non- refimdable tiling fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly. 4. X Proof of ownersIrp (Copy of deed). 5. X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. X 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -%z x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 02/2002 LEG5 ' CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT IILA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF, RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES AND EXCEPT THE RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR STATE ROAD 846, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 3 AN-NDIE42 L-A-AND UlUSEE 0 Z Q J 1 U 0 mU M) W Cl)V , Q U W L 0 U Q 0 0 I 0 m 2 0 W Z �Q �o mQ W � o. UaoBe�� mr�$d�z Wd ELBSE SOOZ /SI /b'Wp (VdW9M9) 3511 ONMVWW9MO) VdW9 0 z a od zj N p XI 0 Z -XI N XQ Wm yj 3 0 W °' W ' Q t- ZEE po za 0> V O V R p$ 4 m Z W - Oar O � W , p j LAJ O Z >:p UpQ�a Z n � o Z W _ J H N a O-. Z — — LLl a n z Lj x L LI a -J - - ^ - - - LJ^ x L.LI Q CD LLJ N Q N z Z n o NC Q 0lJ � J - w wo O N� x x z LL F tl n R F- a Z o m D J O _ R 9 W J J x O — U fz �Q �o mQ W � o. UaoBe�� mr�$d�z Wd ELBSE SOOZ /SI /b'Wp (VdW9M9) 3511 ONMVWW9MO) VdW9 § § U) Er -0 E ~< / . /!W \<\AT / CO § § U) \E) | \ \\\ \] \\ ..¢ \ }z ! |, � m Er -0 \E) | \ \\\ \] \\ ..¢ \ }z ! |, � m -0 E ~< / . /!W \<\AT / \E) | \ \\\ \] \\ ..¢ \ }z ! |, � m ] lip` NO }2 lip` !!/ § \ \!¥ )� } \� \ |��.. | | |,! . 3K \ � `® ( , ! J ° L96 �rw ¥ v� }m MIS vZfl� � m � m W■ m 06 ONnind-idodaiv IN e! j\ . |» __Q _$\ !!/ § \ \!¥ )� } \� \ |��.. | | |,! . 3K \ � I I L u I'M I I CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT V.D.5 Market Conditions Analysis Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict The proposed sub - district comprises 8± acres and is located in the Corkscrew Planning Community of rural Collier County. Presently 4± acres of the property is zoned C -2, Convenience Commercial and formerly supported a restaurant. Approximately 4± acres of the subdistrict is zoned MH, Mobile Home. At the time of application filing, the entire 8± acres is vacant, and the former restaurant structure and mobile homes have been removed. The property owner has discussed with nearby property owners the possibility and viability of redeveloping the property with neighborhood level commercial uses, which would primarily serve the growing residential population in the Corkscrew Island and Rural Estates area. For purposes of this market conditions analysis, we have assumed a population and trade area extending approximately 3 miles from the subject property. An aerial exhibit identifying this primary market area has been included for reference. Generally, the area extends north and east to Everglades Boulevard and south to Randal Boulevard. In addition to the recent population increases in the market analysis area, the Immokalee Road Corridor has grown to become the only arterial roadway in this geographic area of increasing population. Due to the still rural nature of the area, many of the trips represent pass -by- traffic by nearby residents who presently must travel from five to ten miles to obtain most daily goods and services. Additionally, Corkscrew sanctuary is located within one mile and significant numbers of annual visitors also utilize Immokalee Road. Population Growth According to the Collier County 2003 Demographic and Economic Profile, the Corkscrew Planning Community had a year 2000 permanent population of 1,019. The year 2005 population projection is 1,242. By 2015, the Corkscrew Planning community is expected to have a permanent population of 1,967. Over this planning time frame permanent population is anticipated to nearly double from 2000 to 2015. The contiguous planning community of the Rural Estates has experienced a rapidly increasing permanent population, which trend is anticipated to continue through the planning horizon. In year 2000, the Rural Estates Planning Community had a F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA(BWGMPA)\APPLICATION\Muket Conditions Analysis.doc permanent population of 18,815. In the 2005 estimate, the Rural Estates has increased the permanent population to 29,134. The Rural Estates Planning Community encompasses a geographic area exceeding that of the proposed market analysis. In January 2002, Collier County prepared a Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand report that estimated sub -area population within the Rural Estates Planning Community. Study area 3, of the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand, roughly fits within the market area as analyzed for the subject plan amendment. The study area 3 was estimated to have a permanent population in year 2000 of 7,640. The estimated year 2005 population is 10,885, and anticipated year 2015 population is 14,633. Of significance to this market analysis, and not reflected in the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Demand is the year 2004 approval of 1,700 additional residences within a portion of the Rural Settlement Area ( Orangetree). This additional dwelling unit allocation would equate to an additional expected population of 4,930 in the primary market area. The growth projections indicate that by year 2015, the primary market area analyzed will have a permanent population of approximately 22,000. This year 2015 projected population exceeds that of Marco Island, and is only slightly less that the expected 2015 population of the City of Naples. Infrastructure Availability The subject property is not presently nor expected to be within the boundaries of the Collier County water and sewer District. The County has announced plans to construct a new water and sewer facility on 200± acres within the Orangetree PUD. While not anticipated to serve the subject property, the facility will be designed to service the growing Orangetree community, including Twin Eagles and Orange Blossom Ranch. The availability of water and sewer services in these areas will support the anticipated growth of the Corkscrew and Rural Estates areas. Collier County is also in the process of expanding Immokalee Road from its present two -lane condition to 4 -lanes within the primary market area. These infrastructure improvements will continue to provide support for the anticipated increase in population through the planning horizon. Commercial Inventory The 2003 Demographic and Economic Profile identified no existing commercial uses within the Corkscrew Planning Community. Commercial uses have been approved as part of the Heritage Bay DRI /PUD. For purposes of this market analysis this future commercial development has not been included due to its distance from the subject property. Due to the configuration of the Corkscrew Planning Community, the Heritage Bay DRI /PUD is approximately 8t miles from the subject property. The Heritage Bay Commercial development and is not designed to provide supporting goods and services to the immediate area. F:VOB\BOB WILL MS GMPA(BWGMPA)\APPLICATION\Market Conditions A Iysis.dm The Rural Estates Planning area does include existing commercial uses, primarily located within the Orangetree PUD and Orange Blossom Ranch PUD. Approximately 70 acres of commercial development has been authorized within the two above - mentioned PUD's; however, many of the proposed commercial land uses are designed to serve a larger geographic area than the proposed neighborhood commercial subdistrict. The Rural Estates planning community has a current and anticipated deficit of commercial land use. One other factor that will have an impact on population and demand for commercial goods and services is the construction of Ave Maria University, located just east of the primary market analyses area. This new town and university will have a significant impact in population and demand for services outside its planning community. Summary The proposed 8± -acre Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial sub - district consists of 4± acres of zoned commercial, and will represent an overall increase in Neighborhood Commercial area of approximately 4 acres. Given the significant population increases anticipated between 2005 and 2015, demand for commercial uses can be expected to increase as well. Although commercial uses have been approved in the Orangetree area, these commercial uses are oriented to service a regional population, service personnel related to Ave Maria University and the elementary, middle, and high school populations in the immediate area. The present Growth Management Plan does not provide alternative opportunities for neighborhood commercial uses within the Corkscrew or Rural Estates Planning Communities. The proposed subdistrict will satisfy a growing demand for neighborhood commercial goods and services in the Corkscrew and Rural Estate areas. It is well located to service the population, with direct access to Immokalee Road, and without negative impacts to any nearby residential properties. F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA)WPPLICATION\Market Conditions Analysis.dm K f 1 F$ L.' lit, 6. c s. a „,as e k QS3 i � i�d I }4�Ay� � �i"'i J is t 6. c s. a „,as e k QS3 i � i�d l I_r _� EXHIBIT IV.B COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Proposed Text to the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide neighborhood level commercial land uses in an area of Collier County that has a rapidly increasing population and demand for conveniently located commercial goods and services. The historical land uses in this area have been predominantly rural in nature, and the growing population has largely been required to obtain food items, personal services, and other commercial goods from purveyors located in the urbanized area of Collier County, Collier County recognizes the resulting benefits to the local infrastructure when appropriately scaled commercial goods and services are conveniently located near population centers. The Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict _ comprises approximately 8 t acres. The Subdistrict will permit a variety of retail office and personal services uses that are generally consistent with the types of uses found in the C -2 commercial convenience zoning district. A maximum of 90,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable building area shall be permitted in the subdistrict. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. F:\IOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA)WPPLICATION \Growth Management Plan.dm 0 r 4,"Io- FIR) 10, R AM 113 6 V KN F� F OUP m N�V m YSO i KrAm O —� w ui✓, ,n � m Q Y •i {��4�c3TrjR�i ppl�eg �.gg1 1p 6p_yjj ;rc '0 2x' `Gulf Of B�] IPifi�El Ei�li tll &1 Q� Ii s 98 1 I s t4 1 I s as 1 15 69 1 1 s OS 1--L—s is 1 I s zs 1 I s_ CS 1 GiyN T 46 5 I T 47 5 I T 46 5 T 49 5 T 50 5 T 51 5 T 52 5 T 53 5 6 § E !' � e e, � — irvnov vetl..oae unnov 3vry � �� n ®oo °ol f� l�{ ®�I •1 g � k �e 4 c a 1p e g M E � pa al ei d � n soawnl 10El ® yzg h A ON IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII E � .m IIIE! 1.itll���� Illlllllllllllliljrs f R ➢f0 t`( li3S 1�4�1I r. 44, 7 4 .°i �Zia� $ yI � a ® �, liEIMERE : ,n � m Q Y •i {��4�c3TrjR�i ppl�eg �.gg1 1p 6p_yjj ;rc '0 2x' `Gulf Of B�] IPifi�El Ei�li tll &1 Q� Ii s 98 1 I s t4 1 I s as 1 15 69 1 1 s OS 1--L—s is 1 I s zs 1 I s_ CS 1 GiyN IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII .m IIIE! 1.itll���� Illlllllllllllliljrs f R ➢f0 t`( li3S 1�4�1I r. 44, 7 4 .°i �Zia� $ yI � a 464• . ,n � m Q Y •i {��4�c3TrjR�i ppl�eg �.gg1 1p 6p_yjj ;rc '0 2x' `Gulf Of B�] IPifi�El Ei�li tll &1 Q� Ii s 98 1 I s t4 1 I s as 1 15 69 1 1 s OS 1--L—s is 1 I s zs 1 I s_ CS 1 GiyN EXHIBITSVC,,I,, VC.2,,ANIDVC,.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT The subject property is located in Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East in Collier County, Florida. Specifically, the property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Platt Road. The site is bordered on the north, south and west by residential uses zoned A -MHO. The east side is bordered by Immokalee Road. The subject property is 8± areas in area. Of the 8± acres, 4± acres are zoned C -2, Convenience Commercial, and was previously developed as a restaurant. The remaining 4± acres are zoned MH, Mobile Home, and was previously developed with mobile homes. The restaurant and mobile homes have been removed and the property is presently vacant. A review of the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) identified site soils to be Oldsmar Fine Sand. The Oldsmar Fine Sand is described as a poorly drained, nearly level soil found in flatwoods. In a natural state this soil type is consistent with the natural vegetation of South Florida Slash Pine, Cabbage Palm, Saw Palmetto and Waxmyrtle. Under the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS), historically it can be assumed that the previous FLUCFCS designation would have been 411, Pine Flatwoods. This would be consistent with the existing, off -site vegetation in the area and the Oldsmar Fine Sand type soils. However, with the development of the site, the FLUCFCS designation has changed due to the occupation of the property by man-made structures. During the occupation by the man-made structures, the next generation FLUCFCS designations were 112, Residential Low Density, Mobile Home and Commercial Services, 1415 Restaurant. With the removal of the mobile homes and restaurant, the current FLUCFCS is 740, Disturbed Lands. The subject property is void of any indigenous vegetation consistent with the 411 Classification. Man-made alteration to the land has resulted in a silted in pond, a remnant of the mobile home generation. LISTED SPECIES DISCUSSION With the evolution of the subject site from FLUCFCS 411, Pine Flatwoods, to FLUCFCS 740, Disturbed Lands, the habitat consistent with the fauna and flora of the Pine Flatwoods has been altered to the extent that the habitat no longer exists and does not support those protected species associated with the 411 Pine Flatwoods classification. In all probability, any listed species would normally seek to traverse or migrate through an area consistent with their habitat to ensure their safety. However, that is not to say there is a distinct possibility that any of those listed F:VOB\BOB WILLMMS GMPA (BWGMPA)UPPLICATION\EXH VC I VC2 - Envim=mtai.do species found in Table 1 would traverse or migrate through the subject site during their journey from one habitat to another. Table 1. Protected species list according to FLUCFCS category FLUCFCS Potential Listed Species 411 Beautiful Pawpaw Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Eastern Indigo Snake Fakahatchee Burmannia Florida Black Bear Florida Coontie Florida Panther Gopher Frog Gopher Tortoise Red- Cockaded Woodpecker Satinleaf Southeastern American Kestrel Twisted Air Plant F:UOMBOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA)\APPLICATION\EXH VC1 VC2 - EnvimnmmtAdm ♦ ; �k .'�'P4i r���3fG �(�.+ by r�" A 7r a "rl Af c r M's , ,k .rc a t s td, Fyn s >f' y'' ✓ `, A :} § \ \) life j § • — |; - § � / � GOLDEN GATE AREA COMMERCIAL LAND USE DEMAND Prepared for: The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Prepared By: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department January 2002 I. Introduction The Golden Gate area continues to experience tremendous growth in -line with countywide trends. The population growth rate in the Naples metropolitan area (MSA) was ranked second in the nation (up 65.3 %) from 1990 to 2000 (Census 2000). For purposes of adding more detail and maintaining consistency with prior studies, the Golden Gate Area is subdivided into four sub- areas as depicted in Map 1. These sub - areas, or study areas, are of substantial size to represent a traditional market trade area. As evidenced in Table 1, the Golden Gate area actually experienced population growth (up 72.97o) in excess of the already stellar countywide rate. Table 1. County and Golden Gate Study Area Population Growth Geo `iaphy 1990 2000 % Chan e Study Area 1 19,134 27,719 44.87% Study Area 2 2,647 5,278 99.40% Study Area 3 1,919 7,640 298.12% Study Area 4 376 1000 165.96% Study Areas Total 24,076 41,637 72.94% Collier County Total 152,099 251,377 65.27% Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2000 In accordance with basic economic theory, changes in number of consumers and/or income can shift (i.e. increase or decrease) demand for normal goods and services t. The proliferation of new households in the Golden Gate area represents an apparent increase in consumer demand for the variety of goods and services households typically consume. Moreover, increases in income also manifest as positive shifts in demand for normal goods and services. The purpose of this restudy is to examine the demand for commercial space in the Golden Gate Area community in consideration of projected future growth. The groundwork for this restudy is contained in a previous Comprehensive Planning Staff report entitled Analysis of the Golden Gate Area Commercial Land Use Needs, October 1996. That study was adopted on April 9, 1996, by the Board of County Commissioners as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The methodology used in the original study was adapted from an earlier 1988 study completed by Reynolds, Smith and Hills (RS &H) in conjunction with the Countywide Growth Management Plan. As with the original (1996) study, there are three primary objectives for this study: • Document the existing commercial space within the Golden Gate area • Project future demand for commercial space, and • Discuss an appropriate spatial distribution and allocation of commercial acreage. In addition to the above, a brief theoretical background is also presented. Moreover, consideration is also given to methodology assumptions and the satisfaction of consumer demand from retailers located outside the subject study areas. 1 Reference any intermediate level Economics Textbook's discussion of Demand. 0 PREPARED COMMUNITY vcvu�.rmcm .., v v FILE: GCMP -9.OWG DATE:v 12/01 MAP 1 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN COMMERCIAL STUDY AREAS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HENDRY CO. 'Z II. Background Information The basis for anticipating an increase in demand for commercial space in the study area is rather straightforward. Assuming a typical consumer purchases a composite set of goods at a retail store, the full cost of a shopping trip entails more than just store purchases. The consumer also incurs transportation and time costs. Moreover, lengthy trips can produce a substantial amount of disutility in the form of traffic congestion and other nuisance costs2. The effect of including all costs, in excess of the retail purchase, results in an increasing cost to consumers located at greater distances from the retail center3. Indeed, transportation costs are typically assumed to increase at a constant rate (e.g. $0.20 /mile) with distance, An increase in population within a given geographic area will influence both the consumer and retailer in at least two important ways. The retailer will see the level of demand for store products increase per unit of area. Demand for store products increase and storeowners see a corresponding increase in revenue. Crowded store aisles and parking lots are two outward signs of this growth. The primary spatial affect on the retailer is that normal returns can now be earned with a smaller primary trade area. Hence, this growth eventually creates incentive for retailers to build new stores given increased business activity and capacity constraints at existing stores. This growth in population driven demand likewise affects the consumer. First, market forces become favorable for a price increase. An increase in demand for a product or service places upward pressure on its price, all else equal. Although this is a standard function of any price system, the extent of this occurrence will vary according to product. Whether or not product prices increase, the consumer will likely see the full costs of a shopping trip rise under a scenario of rapid population growth. In other words, even if the rise in purchase price remains negligible, time and nuisance costs would increase with congestion and distance. Hence, the market forces that compel retailers to build new stores also benefits the consumer by providing closer shopping venues and helping alleviate upward pressure on prices. Although not explicitly addressed in this study, job creation is another substantial benefit associated with the construction and operation of new retail outlets. III. Study Methodology and Data The methodology used in this study is consistent with the approach used in the 1996 Staff study and the countywide 1988 RS &H study. These studies utilize a standard approach to approximate the amount of supportable commercial space in an area °. Population and income growth projections drive the methodology by yielding projected increases in consumer retail expenditures in an area. Projected consumer retail expenditures are derived by multiplying total area income by the share of personal income spent on retail purchases. A sales per square foot (SPF) parameter is then divided into consumer retail expenditures to arrive at the amount of retail square feet that could be supported by the population. Another parameter, the floor area ratio (FAR), is then used to arrive at a corresponding acreage requirement for the supportable retail 2 These type effects can be considered an externality. An externality exists when the welfare of a household depends not only on his or her activities, but also on the activities under the control of other consumers. 3 A detailed theoretical and graphical description of retail market areas can be found in: Heilbrun, James. Urban Economics and Public Policy. 1987. St. Martin's Press, Inc. ° See Retail Development in Growing Communities: How Much Retail Can Our Town Support ?. Issue 37, September 1999. Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin Extension. square footage estimate. Although this approach contains a number of intermediate steps, the process is fully rooted in projections of population and income growth along with the SPF and FAR parameters. A schematic outlining the data hierarchy and methodology is depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1 provides a summary of both the flow and calculations involved in the forecast procedure used in this restudy. Additional insight is provided in the next section describing source data. Data Notes and Descriptions Population Projections (POP) — Population projections are based on Comprehensive Planning forecasts for each of the four study areas. Forecasts of future population were based on high range for five years and medium range countywide population projections developed by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR). BEBR's countywide totals were disaggregated based on the share of growth in each respective study area in accordance with 2000 Census Data. All forecasts reflect permanent population figures due to the unique nature of the area. More specifically, the area presents relatively few opportunities for seasonal residents and is commonly associated with providing workforce housing. Per Capita Income (PCI) — Income data are adapted from 2001 forecasts of personal income by Woods and Poole Economics, Inc. The differential between per capita income estimates at the County level and the Census Tracts making up the study areas is used to adjust forecasts5. Where Census tracts and study areas overlapped, a weighted average procedure was used. As suspected, countywide per capita income levels overestimate study area income levels. Per capita income in the four study areas were 35% to 40% less than the countywide level. These findings support the common recognition of the NGGE as an area of relative affordability. Woods and Poole, Inc. per capita income projections are defined according to Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimates of personal income'. Per capita income forecasts are presented in "constant" 1996 dollars. Persons Per Dwelling Unit (PPDU) — Calculated for each study area in the 2000 base year. . Defined as the total population divided by the number of dwelling units for each study area. These estimates are based on 2000 Census data and Comprehensive planning projections. PPDU is assumed to hold steady in the forecasts beyond 2000. PPDU serves to project the number of dwelling units from population forecasts. Dwelling Units Forecast (DU) — Defined as forecast population divided by persons per dwelling unit. For each forecast time period, DU is given by: DU= POP PPDU 5 Income data from the 2000 Census were not yet available at the tract and block level. Hence, 1990 Census income data were used to calculate differentials between study area income and countywide income. "'Personal income (and income per capita) data used by Woods & Poole are usually much higher than money income data used by the Census because money income excludes some forms of income (Woods & Poole Economic, Inc. 2001 State Profile, Pg. 28) ". 7 Constant dollars measure the real change in income by taking inflation into account. By adjusting for the general rise in price levels (i.e. inflation), an increase in income measures the real rise in consumer purchasing power. -4F t'. �r = +`� iQ :S _ r `` 0. y'sp z i 1'i..' -'. SY` >� Dwelling Unit Income (DUI) — Defined as the product of per capita income and persons per dwelling unit. For each forecast time period, DUI is given by: DUI = PCI • PPDU Total Area Income (TAI) - Represents the total stock of personal income available in each of the four study areas defined according to dwelling unit income and counts. TAI is defined as the product of dwelling unit income and number of dwelling units. For each forecast time period, TAI is given by: TAI =DUI • DU Retail Expenditures (RE) — Represents the share of total area income devoted to retail sales. Data for retail sales are from the Census of Retail Trade published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retail expenditures were found to make up approximately 35.0% of personal income in Collier County. This figure is below the 44.0% figure used in the RS &H study. This discrepancy can be explained by the use of BEA income estimates rather than Census money income data used in prior studies (See Footnote No. 6). This 35% share is applied to total area income to arrive at retail expenditures for each study area at each forecast time period, as follows: RE = TAI . 35% Parameters Sales Per Square Foot (SPF) — Sales per square foot is the parameter used to translate retail expenditures into supportable square feet. These data can be obtained from at least a couple of different sources. The National Research Bureau (NRB) publishes a Shopping Center Census with state level estimates of sales per square foot. In the NRB's 2000 Census, SPF was found to be $246.04 in the State of Florida for all shopping center size categories. Sales per square foot estimates for Collier County are in general agreement with NRB state findings. As the name indicates, SPF is defined as annual total retail sales divided by total retail square footage ($ /SF). In order to accurately estimate SPF, only property appraiser defined land uses with close correspondence to the Census Bureau's definition of retail sales are used in the calculation. For instance, the square footage of hotels /motels and theaters are excluded from the SPF calculation since the Census Bureau's definition of retail sales excludes these product services. In Collier County, SPF was determined to be approximately $223.568 based on projected 2001 retail sales of $3431.27 Million,and a countywide commercial square footage estimate of 15,348,589 SF9. This figure is rounded up to $225.00 consistent with NRB's higher statewide average and the practice of ensuring conservative forecasts. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) — The FAR converts supportable square feet to supportable acreage. The FAR is the share of a developed lot occupied by actual commercial floor space. FAR is given by the ratio of commercial floor area to overall site size. In the 1996 Golden Gate study, a FAR ranging from 17.46 % to 18.67% was utilized. Utilizing current figures, the FAR ranges from 18.82% to 21.65% depending on whether hotels /motels and theaters are excluded or included, respectively. This study utilizes a FAR of 20.0% based on this range. Hence, 20% of a site/lot is devoted to building floor space, leaving the remaining 8017o for parking, drainage, open space and all other secondary uses. e Consistent with treating income in current dollars, the growth rate of real income is applied to SPF in the forecasts. 9 Includes Unincorporated County and City of Naples estimates of developed SF. L. Supportable Square Feet (SSF) — Defined as retail expenditures divided by sales per square feet. For each forecast time period, SSF is given by: SSF = RE SPF Given RE is measured in dollars ($) and SPF in dollars per square foot ($ /SF), the units cancel to yield SF. SSF is adjusted to account for a typical 5.0% vacancy rate. Thus, SSF is multiplied by 1.05 to yield the real supportable square footage for a study area. Supportable Acreage (SA) — Represents the final demand for commercial acreage within a study area. SSF is first converted to acres (SSF /43,560) and then divided by the FAR to arrive at SA. More specifically, for each forecast time period, SA is given by: SA = SSF * 1 43560 FAR IV. Results All data components and forecasts of commercial space demand, as represented by SA, are assembled in Table 2. These results are accumulated in Table 3 to show forecast demand for the entire Golden Gate area. Forecasts are made in five -year increments to the year 2020. In compiling this information, various data sources and forecast assumptions were made in the analysis. While these sources and assumptions are deemed to be accurate and reasonable, results should be interpreted in recognition of these factors. I Table 2. Commercial Land Use Demand Forecasts for Golden Gate Study Areas 1-4 S7U07MSA 1• psomment Foorrbtiae 2000 1006 1010 1016 1010 Population, Prnlectloes(POP) 27,719 39,492 46.069 63,090 60,423 par Cwts Income wo) $201S7 536,541 $33,041 136,666 338,115 Fearsome par Des lnb unit (PFW 146 2.46 246 2.46 146 Damping Unit, IOU) 11285 16078 18763 11614 24599 Dwelling unit lncome(DOp 5691064 $75,019 581,158 $97,361 $93,624 Total Area income (TAO S779,376,531 S;206,115,4T7 S3521,797.955 $1888 ,198,769 5;303,067,523 Projected Retail 6apendlWras(RE) $27 ;781786 $422,140,417 5532,979,249 $660,369,569 $806,073,633 Sales per Square Foot(SPF) 5325 5244 3264 $285 $305 Supportable Square Feat(SSF) 1,211363 1727,267 21015,804 2,323,036 2,642,779 Supportable Square Fast Including trylul 5 %mcprmy 1 272 ,932 1.813,630 2,116,594 2,438,138 2,774,918 Flow Yea Fist. (FAR) 0300 0200 0.200 0200 0.200 Supportable ACrrge(SA) 146.12 208.18 242.95 279.86 318.52 M"MFA I- Permanent Populylen 2000 1006 3010 1016 1010 Popu4uon, Projectiom(pop) 5,278 1,520 6,776 10,109 11,505 Pa Gplta Income(PC4) $25,451 527,645 $29,908 $32,194 $34,502 Proton, M Drilling Unit (PPDIO 3.04 3.04 104 3.04 3.04 Dolling Units IOU) 1734 2470 2883 3321 3780 DaeaWng Wit IAerns(DUO 377,476 $94,156 $91,044 $98,002 3105,027 Total New Income (TAI) $134,331669 $207,883,479 S21IZ466,175 $325,445,894 $396,951,783 Projected Reba EVendUtnes(RE) $47,014064 $72,759,218 591863163 $113,906,063 $339.933,114 Salem pr, Sq.. Fool (SPA $235 S244 $264 $285 3306 SuppMaWe Square Fast(SSF) 208,960 19T,708 347,440 400,221 455,504 SupperbWe Square Fast Including Opical 5% maoamcy 219,408 331,593 364A32 420,232 478979 Ras, aras Retie (FAR) 0200 MOO 0200 0100 0200 Supportable Acreage (SA) 25.18 3588 41.87 4824 54.90 STM'ANDl B•Pormreat FUpeInDea 1000 1008 1010 1038 =tti Formation, M1ajectlona(POP) 7,840 10485 12,703 14,333 16.850 Pr ceplb Income TOO $M70S $29,007 $31381 $33,180 $36,201 P. per D earK unit (PPDU) 190 190 190 190 190 DaNling Who, (DU) 2632 3750 0.978 5041 STU DeaBtg Unit pwooe(DUO 377.516 $84,199 591090 $98,052 $105,080 Toth Area. In. (TAO $204,026.155 $316,736,405 3398,839,10 $494,295,015 $602,899,372 projecbu Rpb3 Eapeamybrr(RE) $7140'154 $116,5OB.441 313'623,969 $173,003,265 $211,014,855 Syr per, Sq.. FoW ISM 3225 $244 2164 $235 $305 Suppxr6N Seven FM(SSF) 31TA74 452,168 517,700 607,365 691,830 SupportabM Square FaeaV IncludingO -WAl 5 %mpcporY 333.243 474,774 554,085 638,159 726.421 Floc Arr Apda(FM) 0100 0200 0100 0200 0200 S"Mat"ble Aaasg. ISA) 3825 54.50 63.60 7336 81118 STUDYM41- pprmwet FapWagee 2000 2006 1010 1016 =11, population, prgas -MOP) 1,000 1,425 1563 1.815 2,180 per Capita Incwnea (PCO 526,069 $23,316 330,634 532,975 $35,339 Factor pear Creeping Unit (PPOI) 312 312 312 3.12 311 Dappng W%e(DU) 321 457 534 816 700 Demoting Wit Income, (DUQ $81330 $"333 $9 5,434 $102,749 5110,115 Total Ares Inparm(TAO $26,068.763 540,341,424 550,934,888 3831154901 $77,033,625 Projastad Real Fayandlbrres(RE) $9,124,067 $14,11'348 $17,827,1]1 $22}04,915 324981734 Salt pr Square Foot (SPF) $US 3144 $264 $285 $305 Supporbte Spmn Fast (559 40,551 57,774 37,415 7T,M1 88,398 SupporbON Spam Feet totaling typical 5% rapanpt 41579 rRi'm 70,T96 31551 92838 Floor Ana R.* (FM) 0300 0200 0200 0200 0200 S.Mrsioaba Acreage SSA) 4.39 6.96 9.13 9.36 10.65 Rpy Quarter ROB or I..(" Stall Aran) 8.62% 8.19% 1.69% 717% NOTE Projection, b not area tar acoouata ,MM PopWatias M pA, aWd7 rep, ieu , titer rte torso sme sit" M Inbrgabd WN au0an. Table 3. Commercial Land Use Demand Forecasts For Entire Golden Gate Area ation, Projections (POP) age Per Capita Income (PCI) no per Dwelling Unit - Average (PPDU) Ing Units - Study Area Sum (DU) Ing Unit Income (DUI) Area Income (TAI) cted Retail Expenditures •Study Area Sum (RE) per Square Foot(SPF) ortable Square Feet - Study Area Sum (SSF) ortable Square Feet, Including typical 5% Vacancy Area Ratio (FAR) ortable Acreage -Study Area Sum (SA) : Projections do not take into account a Bulidout I 41,637 59,321 69,230 79,747 90,763 $26,586 $28,878 $31,241 533,629 $36,039 2.98 2.88 2-88 2.88 2.88 15972 22755 26556 30590 34816 $76,560 $93,161 $89,967 $96,843 8103,785 $1,222,788,260 $1,892,312,362 $2,389,165,267 $2,962,454,210 83,613,354,797 $400,331,092 $619,527,925 $782,193,590 $969,883,802 $1,1112,963,446 $225 $244 $264 $285 $305 3,779,249 2,534,915 2,958,368 3,407,790 3,878,509 1,868,212 2,661,661 3,106,286 3,578480 4,072,435 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 214.44 305.52 356.55 410.72 467.45 9 IV. Summary & Conclusions An inventory of the existing commercial lands within each study area is presented in Table 4. This Table also depicts the difference between existing commercial acreage and forecast demand in 2005 and 2010. These deficit/surplus calculations are only made to the year 2010 given the increasing likelihood of forecast error and the potential to reach buildout populations. The first column of boxes summarizes existing commercial acreage in each study area. The second and third columns of boxes summarize the forecast demand and associated surplus /deficit of commercial acreage in 2005 and 2010. Graphical treatments of these values are also provided in Graph 1. Currently, study area 1 contains most of the available commercial land for the entire area. Approximately 84% of the total existing commercial acreage is located in study area 1. Accordingly, study area 1 is the only sub -area to possess a surplus of commercial space in 2005 (25.06 acre surplus). On the other hand, study areas 2-4 are all characterized by deficient amounts of commercial acreage. In short, these findings suggest that population and income growth can support additional commercial space within the Golden Gate area. However, other factors deserve careful consideration when interpreting these results. Namely, availability of retail space immediately adjacent to the study areas is recognized as helping serve retail needs. Nonetheless, even when considering these adjacent retail centers, each study area is of adequate size to support what is typically characterized as a neighborhood and/or community shopping center10. 10 For example, The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) defines a Neighborhood Center as possessing a primary trade area of 3 miles or less, and a Community Center as one possessing a primary trade area of 3 -6 miles. ICSC also gives a site acreage range of 3 -15 acres for Neighborhood Centers, and 10-40 acres for Community Centers. E Table 4. Ex study Ansa 1 CorllmerCl81 Acreage ana rurncast naqulraman Sydlyyyaa2 Existing Commercial -2001 Developed Undeveloped Total Acreage Commercial Zoning 179 0 179 PUD 0 0 0 ..... e....n. L79 0 179 2010 2005 2005 2010 2010 Demand Swplusor(Dendt) Demand Surplas of(De"CM 208.18 25.06 24295 (9.71) SddyAW3 2010 2010 Fxleting Commercial .2001 2010 2010 Demand Surplus of(DOnck) Developed Undeveloped Total Acreage 35.88 (34.09) Commercial Zoning (40.08) 5.46 715 12.81 PUD 6.01 23.69 29.7 ...... e....s. 7147 30.94 42.31 surdy,lraa4 Fxletlng Commer0a1-2001 Developed Undeveloped Total Acreage Commercial Zoning PUD (8o commercial zoning exists In Study Area 41 Total Acreage D 2005 2005 2010 2010 2005 2005 2010 2010 Demand Surplus of(DOnck) Demand Surplus or (Deficit) 35.88 (34.09) 4L87 (40.08) 2005 2005 2010 2010 Demand Sulplusor(Defick) Demand Surplus or(Defick) 54.50 (1219) 63.60 (2129) 2005 2005 2010 2010 Demand Surplus or(Dendt) Demand Surplus or(Degck) 6.96 (6.96) 843 (813) 0 Total AN Study Areas 277.34 305.52 (2818) 356.55 (79.21) • From Cellar County Property AppreaeYa Office and Compreheaslre Planning Staff, 2001 ••Forecasts based on methodology outlined In Flgrae 1. L -Demand" Is the lorecest Supportable Acreage (SA) for the specified year 2. Asurplus or (deficit) is given by ma difference between existing totsl acreage and demand (Supportable Acreage) 3. A deficit (negative value In parenthesis) Intllestes Supportable acres 0.0. demand) exceeds the eunent stock of commercial acres a. Deficits (negative values) 101680M the cemme.dal a «sage requirement for tee subjeed area. 4. Projections do not take Into account a BuildeM Population for each study ama. Thus, ]Met date forecasts Mould be Interpreted w Gn phi commercial Acreage ourprw am ever... rarvws.+. Difference Between Existing and Supportable Acres 40.00 - - -- - --- — ---- - - - - -- 25.06 20.00 ram m _ (6.961_(9.,3) _ Tg N (20.00) 9]1) 12.19 (21.291 ` I f2B_18 E7 (40.00) - - t34.D9(40.oe) E : (60.00) .i _ C1 W (80.00)` _ _. _.. (79.21) (100.00) I II 111 IV Total Study Areas - (7 2005 Surplus or (Deficit) 0 2010 Surplus or (Deficit) l � t) 5.c. Draft Survey Review Attachment: Draft Survey This draft survey was distributed at the January P meeting for the committee's review. It is attached herein for those that were not at the meeting. Directions are provided on the cover sheet of the survey. Draft Survey Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy A draft survey was prepared and is attached for your review, comments and answers to the questions. Discussion of the draft survey for the development of a final draft will occur at the Committee' s next meeting on January 23, 2002. Please consider the following as you are reviewing the survey: 1. As you answer all the questions consider whether they are relevant to Golden Gate 2. Pick the top 10 — 15 questions you believe would be most helpful if the survey were distributed to all Golden Gate residents 3. Consider how the survey should be distributed: a. Mail b. Website c. Newspaper 4. Add any additional questions you feel would be useful Bring the draft survey back to the next meeting. Changes to the survey will be decided and best method(s) of distribution will be determined. DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROCESS The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Update Advisory Committee and Collier County Comprehensive Planning Services staff are currently engaged in updating the Golden Gate Area Master Plan; an element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. When the Update is completed, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan will be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and will guide growth and development within the Greater Golden Gate Area for at least the next five years. The Committee and County staff are seeking your help in identifying issues of concern for residents of the Greater Golden Gate Area. Please take some time to respond to the following survey. Individual responses will be kept strictly confidential. Your name and address will not be used for promotional purposes and you will not be contacted unless you so desire. A. YOUR VISION OF GOLDEN GATE Through the Golden Gate Area Master Planning process, area residents have the opportunity to influence the future of the Golden Gate community. Therefore, please take a few moments to think about the overall quality of life for residents of the Greater Golden Gate Area. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents your opinion. # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 1 The Golden Gate Area has major strengths upon which the community 5. 4 3 2 1 can build. 2 Challenges facing the Golden Gate Area in the future have the potential 5 4 3 2 1 to damage. the Area's quality of life. 3 The County should create new neighborhoods in the Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Area by closing through streets, providing landscaping and /or entrance features, and developing neighborhood parks and/or constructing sidewalks. Comments: B. INFRASTRUCTURE The Merriam - Webster Collegiate Dictionary defines public infrastructure as the system of public works of a country, state, or region. In this sense, infrastructure includes roads, water distribution systems, wastewater collection systems (i.e., sewers), drainage systems, electrical networks, public buildings and other facilities that make public service provision possible. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents' your opinion. # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 — — 3 — 2 1 1 — The level of infrastructure in the Golden Gate Area is adequate to 5 4 3 2 1 meet the Area's current and future needs. 2 The level of infrastructure in the Golden Gate Area is not adequate 5 4 3 2 1 to meet the Area's current and Future needs. 3 Inadequate infrastructure within the Greater Golden Gate Area results in 5 4 3 2 1 harm to the Area's natural environment, economic development and quality of life. 4 Infrastructure is not a problem now, but will become one as more and 5 4 3 2 1 more of the Area's platted lots are occupied. 5 Infrastructure is currently a problem, and one that will only worsen as 5 4 3 2 1 more and more of the Area's platted lots are occupied. 6 Rainfall flooding is a serious problem within the Greater Golden 5 4 3 2 1 Gate Area. 7 The Golden Gate Area requires extensive drainage and flood control 5 4 3 2 1 improvements. 8 Golden Gate residents are willing to pay for additional drainage 5 4 3 2 1 improvements and better flood control facilities. 2 F# Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 9 The road system within the Greater Golden Gate Area is adequate to 5 4 3 2 1 meet the current needs of the j I community. to The road system within the Greater Golden Gate Area is not adequate 5 4 3 2 1 to meet the future needs of the i community. 11 Golden Gate residents would be willing to pay increased gas taxes if 5 4 3 2 1 the money was directed toward road improvements within the Golden Gate Area. _ 12 The Greater Golden Gate Area has an adequate bicycle and pedestrian 5 4 3 2 1 ath s stem. 13 Area residents would be willing to tax themselves for bicycle path and 5 4 3 2 j 1 pedestrian path improvements. 14 The public sewer system within the Greater Golden Gate Area should 5 4 3 2 1 be expanded to incorporate areas currently using septic s stems. 15 The public potable water system within the Greater Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Area should be expanded to incorporate areas currently using se tics stems. � 16 Residents with sewer and water hookups should also be required to 5 4 3 2 1 hook up to a Gray Water (treated wastewater' irri ation system. 17 The Golden Gate Area has an adequate number of public parks 5 4 3 2 I 1 and recreation facilities. Comments: C. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Economic issues affect the character of a community and may determine whether the community is self - sustaining or dependent upon outside influences. An important part of the Master Planning process is to determine whether the Golden Gate Area has an adequate economic base. The following statements concern economic development issues for the community. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents your opinion. ft I Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 The majority of job - seeking Golden Gate residents are easily able to find 5 4 3 2 1 work within the Greater Golden Gate Area. 2 The Greater Golden Gate Area is attractive to start -up businesses and 5 4 3 2 1 companies relocating from other areas. 3 Retail stores within the Greater Golden Gate Area are of sufficient 5 4 3 2 1 types, quality, quantity and distribution to serve the Area's needs. 4 The Greater Golden Gate Area should strive to attract office park 5 4 3 2 1 developments. 5 The Greater Golden Gate Area should strive to attract industrial park 5 4 3 2 1 developments. 6 The County should create incentives for new development within the 5 4 3 2 1 Golden Gate Area, such as streamlined approval processes, impact fee waivers, reduced taxation, etc. 7 The County should provide incentives for new retail development 5 4 3 2 1 within the Greater Golden Gate Area. 8 The Community's overall economic is improving. 5 4 3 2 1 �base 9 1 The Community's overall economic I base is declining. 5 4 3 2 1 Comments: 4 D. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: An important component of any community is its natural environment. Our perceptions of the natural environment influence our overall perception of the community we live in and have important impacts on an area's quality of life. The following statements concern the Golden Gate Area's natural environment and the manner in which it influences the overall quality of life in the community. F For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents your opinion. # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 1 The natural environment of the Golden Gate Area is seriously 5 4 3 2 1 declining. 2 Surface water pollution is a serious problem in the Greater Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Area. 3 Groundwater pollution is a serious problem in the Greater Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Area- 4 The Golden Gate Area faces a serious potable water shortage in the 5 4 3 2 1 near future. 5 Development within the Golden Gate Area is seriously intruding into 5- 4 3 2 1 environmentally sensitive areas. _ 6 Federal and State environmental regulations adequately protect 5 4 3 2 1 wetlands, native uplands and habitat for protected species within the Greater Golden Gate Area. 7 Collier County should develop an environmental permitting program to 5 4 3 2 1 protect wetlands, native uplands and habitat for protected species within the Greater Golden Gate Area. 8 Golden Gate residents would be willing to tax themselves for the 5 4 3 2 1 protection of the Area's protect wetlands, native uplands and habitat for protected species. Comments: E. GROWTH MANAGEMENT: Growth Management can be defined as the rules, procedures and regulations that govern growth and development within an area. When the Golden Gate Area was initially developed, there was very little growth management. Currently, new development in Collier County is subject to many different growth management rules, regulations and processes. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that 'best # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 1 County Government should take an active role in addressing the very 5 4 3 2 1 large number of vacant platted lots in the Greater Golden Gate Area. 2 Overall, development within the Golden Gate Area needs to be more 5 4 3 2 1 tightly regulated. 3 Development regulations within the Golden Gate Area are adequate to 5 4 3 2 1 protect the environment and ensure that the quality of life is not degraded. Comments: I F GOVERNMENTAL (PUBLIC) SERVICES: Public services (sometimes called essential services) include potable water provision, wastewater treatment, electricity, telephone, solid waste disposal, fire protection, police services, emergency medical services, public health services and social services. The following survey statements seek to assess the degree to which residents of Golden Gate are satisfied with the provision of essential services. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents your opinion. # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 1 The essential services provided within the Greater Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Area are adequate to meet the needs of current and future residents. 2 Collier County should take a more active role in providing essential 5 4 3 2 1 services to the Greater Golden Gate Area, 3 Public and private schools within the Golden Gate Area are of sufficient 5 4 3 2 1 number, distribution and quality to meet the area's educational needs. 4 The County's bus system adequately provides for the mass 5 4 3 2 1 transit needs of Golden Gate residents. 5 County services available within the Golden Gate Area should be cut 5 4 3 2 1 back. 6 County services available within the Golden Gate Area should be 5 4 3 2 1 increased. 7 Collier County should rely on public - private partnerships, volunteerism 5 4 3 2 1 and civic groups to provide public services within the Golden Gate Area. 7 # Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 8 The majority of Golden Gate residents are retirees with fixed 5 4 3 2 1 incomes who cannot afford to pay for additions or expansions to public services. _ — – g Private corporations could provide quality services in a more cost- 5 4 3 2 1 effective manner than County Government. — 10 Golden Gate residents would support incorporation if it meant 5 4 3 2 1 improved public services could be provided. 11 One or more municipal services taxing units (MSTUs) or municipal 5 4 3 2 1 services benefit units (MSBUs) should be established within the Greater Golden Gate Area to pay for and provide public services. Comments: G. CIVIC CULTURE: Civic culture is concerned not only with an area's cultural activities, but also with the civic pride, or lack thereof, that residents feel for their community. For the following statements, please select a response from 1 to 5, where 1 means you strongly agree, 2 means you agree, 3 means you are neutral or have no opinion, 4 means you disagree, and 5 means you strongly disagree. Select your response by circling the number that best represents your opinion. # statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 5 4 3 2 1 1 One of the strengths of the Greater Golden Area is its strong civic 5 4 3 2 1 culture. 2 _ There are many examples of civic pride in the Golden Gate 5 4 3 2 1 Community that can serve as "building blocks" for future ro ress. 3 The Golden Gate Community has a positive self - image. 5 4 3 2 1 4 Within the Golden Gate area there is an overarching sense of 5 4 3 2 1 community that connects all age groups and economic levels of residents. 5 Golden Gate area residents are severely divided by various 5 4 3 2 1 tensions or points of rancor. 6 The area's seasonal residents are involved with the area's community 5 4 3 2 affairs. El 7 The various portions of the Golden Gate Area lack a sense of 5 4 3 2 neighborhood identity . 8 The Greater Golden Gate Area possesses a strong business 5 4 3 2 1 environment. 9 Golden Gate residents have a stronq sense of the area's history. 5 4 3 2 1 10 There are aspects of the area's civic culture that need 5 4 3 2 1 improvement. Comments: E - H. RANKING In Sections B through G above, statements were categorized into general groups each addressing a broad set of issues (e.g. infrastructure, economic.development, etc). Within the second column of the Table below, please rank these six issues of concern in order of importance. Please use a 1 to represent the most important issue, 2 the second most important issue, and so on until 6 -the least important issue. Issue of Concern Grouping _ Rank (1 -most important, 6 -least important) Infrastructure Economic Develo ment The Natural Environment Growth Management Governmental Public Services Civic Culture _ 10 In which geographic area (1-4) is your property located? Please circle the number corresponding to the area mapped below. 1 2 3 4 MAP 1 GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HENDRY CO. COLLIER LO. EE CO. LgLER L0. n CITY OF NAPLES z V O s n s S.R. Bt LS tJ MARCO ISLAND N f hl SC.LLE GOLF DF MF'GCO 0 SMI. 10ML PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENNRONNENTAL SERNCES DINSION nt-L GGMP -9.DNG DATE: 12/01 LAKE TRAFFORD C.R. 846 M 6 ft IOAl K EVERGLADES CITY EX''!-- IBII PUB LIC FACAILITTEP-S L FEYEL 0- FSEI-RIVICEI-i" A NA LN"S'll Sr"ll, EXHIBIT V.E. PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject Growth Management Plan Amendment proposes to permit a maximum of 90,000 square feet of commercial development on the 8+ acre property that comprises the Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Subdistrict land use category. Potable Water: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary and outside the Collier County Water and Sewer District Boundary established in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is not provided by Collier County Water and Sewer District. This project will have no impact on the Collier County Regional Water System. Sanitary Sewer: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary and outside the Collier County Water and Sewer District Boundary established in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is not provided by Collier County Water and Sewer District. This project will have no impact on the Collier County Regional Wastewater System. Arterial and Collector Roads: Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary established in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2004 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Drainage are as follows: Drainage LOS Standard Future Development (subsequent to January 1989) — 25 year, 3 day storm Existing Development (prior to January 1989) — current service level Available Inventory as of 9/30/03 311 Canal Miles Required Inventory as of FY2009 347 Canal Miles F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA)WPPLICATION\LOSDOC.dm BWGMPA Planned CIE FY 05 -09 $77,700,000 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) N/A The proposed development in the amendment area will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day storm routing requirements. Solid Waste: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary established in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2004 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Solid Waste are as follows: Solid Waste LOS Standard Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at average disposal rate/previous 5 years Available Inventory as of 9/30/04 4,136,449 Site Tons Required Inventory as of 9/30/09 1,044,716 Site Tons Planned CIE FY 05 -09 2,500,000 Site Tons 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 3,311,016 Site Tons No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities are anticipated from this 8 -acre commercial project. Parks: Community and Regional There are no proposed residential units associated with this newly created land use category, therefore there are no projected community or regional park impacts. F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA)WPPLICATION \LOSDOC.dm BWGMPA E "XL i M-IBITHE.1i.c, f l C.1 M-PACTI S''T'i AliJl E T TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT EXHIBIT V.E.1c Prepared for: Robert E. Williams 1580 East 40`s Terrace SW Naples, FL 34116 Prepared by: Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ PLANNERS 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 (239) 947 -1144 APRIL 2005 C. Dean Smith, P.E. FL 44147 F:VOB\BOB Wa,UAMS GMPA (BWGMPA) \- nS\BWGMPAnS.DOC BWGMPA Table of Contents Tableof Contents .................................................................................................... ............................... i Listof Figures and Tables ..................................................................................... ............................... i INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. ..............................1 SCOPE.................................................................................................................... ..............................1 TRIPGENERATION ........................................................................................... ............................... 1 TRIPASSIGNMENT ............................................................................................ ............................... 5 EXISTINGTRAFFIC ........................................................................................... ............................... 5 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................ ............................... 5 APPENDIX A, SUPPORTING DATA ........................................... ............................A -1 THRU A -5 List of Figures and Tables FIGUREI .............................................................................................................. ............................... 2 TABLE1 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 3 _. TABLE 2 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 3 TABLE3 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 4 TABLE4 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 4 TABLE5 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 6 TABLE6 ................................................................................................................. ..............................7 TABLE7 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 8 TABLE8 ................................................................................................................ ............................... 8 Page I CORKSCREW ISLAND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT INTRODUCTION The proposed Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict is an 8t acre parcel located on the west side of Immokalee Road, on the northwest corner of its intersection with Platt Road, which is approximately 3 miles north of Oil Well Road in Sections 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The subdistrict proposes a maximum of 100,000 square feet of conunercial development, permitting a variety of retail, office, and personal services uses generally consistent with uses found in the C -2 neighborhood commercial zoning district. For project location please refer to Figure 1, Location Map, page 2. The parcel will be accessed from hnmokalee Road or Platt Road. SCOPE The following analyses are included in this report: 1. Trip Generation Calculations (at buildout) presented for Peak Season Daily Traffic (PSDT) including the respective peak hour volumes. 2. Trip Assignment within the Radius of Development Influence (RDI). 3. Existing Traffic Volumes within the RDI; AADT volumes, PSDT volumes, and Level of Service (LOS). 4. Discussion of impacts to roadways within the RDI. TRIP GENERATION The 7th Edition Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is used for trip generation calculations provided in this report. Please refer to Tables 1 through 4 on pages 3 and 4. The trip generation for the proposed use is estimated to be 3,880 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 421 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). The trip generation for the existing use is estimated to be 2,509 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 298 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). This results in a net trip generation for the proposed growth management plan amendment of 1,371 trip ends for daily traffic volume and 123 trip ends during the highest peak hour (PM). Please refer to the DISCUSSION section for details concerning the effects of these traffic volumes on the level of service for roadway links within the RDI. F:VOB\BOB WaLIAMS GMPA(BWGMPA) \TIS\BWGMPATIS.DOC BWGMPA FIGURE ƒ LO C ATƒO N MAP !y, , , ! ! �, |� ; JA; \ / , . ' ! LU \ ' :F m m \| � , , H�\ © � e j' ® ;A |� ,�■ LO C ATƒO N MAP Page 3 Table 1 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION PROPOSED USES EXISTING PERMITTED USES NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR PROPOSED ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK 1 EXISTING ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR I�TTT T1�TTTT TVTT TTTT 1 T>TA VT T / '. TT. 1 , • T> TTY - RM i 171, e� x Al mik, V.11 a t,: R''"��w r i SHOPPING 820 75 T.G.L.A. Ln(T) =.66 Ln(X) + 3.4 518 CENTER GENERAL 710 15 T.G.L.A. (T) = 1.12(X) + 78.81 96 OFFICE EXISTING PERMITTED USES NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR PROPOSED ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK 1 EXISTING ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR I�TTT T1�TTTT TVTT TTTT 1 T>TA VT T / '. TT. 1 , • T> TTY - RM i 171, e� x Al mik, V.11 Page 4 Table 3 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS t & i ° � j�� ii Ulm ."° L. � F SHOPPING CENTER 518 5% 492 GENERAL OFFICE 96 5% 91 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS 11'm Ye�..x� L. � F _'! ✓z ,%+ . 1...6 4 �. zE SHOPPING CENTER 342 5% 325 GENERAL OFFICE 84 5% 80 NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS SHOPPING CENTER 325 33% 218 GENERAL OFFICE 80 0% 80 NET TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON -PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS TOTAL 1 178 1 30.9% 123 Page .5 TRIP ASSIGNMENT The projected directional distribution of traffic to and from Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict site was determined using population and surrounding trip attractions. A modified Fratar method calculation was used based on population projections for the area and proportional distribution of existing traffic. The project directional distribution is shown on Table 5, page 6. Table 6, on page 7, provides details regarding the significance test for impacts to road segments on the surrounding roadway network. Only the accessed roadway segments meet the significance test will be included in the balance of the analysis in this report. EXISTING TRAFFIC Table 7, page 8, shows existing AADT traffic volumes, including peak hour volumes for the roadway links accessed by the project. The values were taken from the 2004 traffic counts published in the Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). The traffic count data is presented in Appendix A, Supporting Data. Level of Service (LOS) determinations are made based on Peak Hour, Peak Direction Service Volumes presented in the AUIR. Table 8, page 8, shows peak hour traffic volumes including project traffic. DISCUSSION The impact ofproj ect traffic volumes on the roadway network surrounding the project is not significant. The volume ofproposed project traffic does not degrade the level of service ofany ofthe roadwaylinks within the project RDI below acceptable standards. All segments will operate at LOS Standard or better. All segments will also have excess peak hour capacity greater than the projected trip generation for the subject property. F:VOB\BOB WB.LIAMS GMPA(BWGMPA) \nS\BWGMPAnS.DOC BWGMPA Page 6 Table 5 PROJECT DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ROADWAY LINK FROM TO % OF PROJECT VOLUME Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 25% Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 50% Immokalee Road Oil Well Road Project 70% Immmokalee Road Project S.R. 29 30% Oil Well Road Immokalee Road Camp Keais Road 20% Camp Keais Road Oil Well Road Immokalee Road 10% S.R. 29 I -75 Oil Well Road 5% S.R. 29 Oil Well Road New Market Road 10% S.R. 29 New Market Road N. 15th Street 15% S.R. 29 N. 15`h Street New Market Road 5% F:VOB\BOB WB.UAMS GMPA (BWGMPA) \nS\BWGMPATIS.DOC BWGMPA LIME U z W A W H U a�. r T� I� W U h G pq 0: k p O O lrCUy M .-. ,a � b b❑ j3 Vj z ,R 5yN . b 3x �� 030 bozo 0 c v 0. O x � % v Ny O �V N N F' N C7 F� H V Q it CC Q Q Q Q Q CA cd 1ti Y U Q � U G � U h �O U w 0 0 y � U � L+ O Q U R3 w 04 C) y O - Q d U O d bb y CC ci cl 'C i4 U � Sr >1 uo G zQ cd ro wcd •y W O QQ zy Page 7 Page 8 Table 7 ROADWAY LINK PEAK HOUR LOS — EXISTING ROADWAY LINK FROM TO AADT PEAK HOUR PEAK DIR. I LOS Immokalee Road Oil Well Road Project 6,095 256 A Immokalee Road Project S.R. 29 6,095 256 A Table 8 ROADWAY LINK PEAK HOUR LOS — WITH PROJECT ROADWAY LINK FROM TO [AAADT PEAK HOUR LOS PEAK DIR. I=okalee Road Oil Well Road Project 7,190 302 B Immokalee Road Project S.R. 29 6,571 276 A F:VOB\BOB WRLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA) \nS\BWGMPAUS.DOC BWGMPA APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DATA A -1 F:VOB\BOB WILLIAMS GMPA (BWGMPA) \TIS\BWGMPATIS.DOC BWGMPA 6 0 U 8 �5 b S s V } 8 �O a a s gg t 930 9 �6n1 a D _ - e � o _ F o � _ W � � m Z - g a V t% ti M I � d y J ° a U y 5 V � W O O i a �5 6 n s V .8 T� .1 O �q F F iSe myl 6g. E d g 8 � I $ R_ - I q nC m0 Om' nli -nj V N G m w a a m g pmP P mgVmV wVUppg6 6 6 U P GwP q GwPwPWpwP p G q pwPwpwul p g p P C P pp �d O p�p � pPOPPpppp P V p Ppp ®PLO p p p] p p o p P S O tS B (S V tS V �n Y N f sy s9� {yry K u 3- s- E d g e= z C x n s V } W r� 10 F :s y5� 6x c a 3 a n o 0 d` '•• � � F j- _ 9 9 _ 9 - s V < V P V G P - � 8 c G P P G P G P G e P G P c o o P W G W P u u u u o u u G P O G P G P � O NOP P P PPG PPGO� n 0 e� i i i fn � �✓. m C � < � � � 5 i5 J � yy yy yy S tltlqq � Gi � � yg y yE Cg yg ya 53 c a x s V 9 N � �e }�i ,o� �� F �_ ayer � 8 d3 R Fe } ha 0 V T� .a O 4 ayi x K 8 e 7 dd &Las a INS 111,11 Jill IN K 8 e 7 dd &Las a T711 H I ®ri) F-+, PROO-, THIS HATF A/ENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Sy1vM Illever, GuIMOn TFY Company, L.C. 3311 TAMIAA4I TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 Pro"M Ap""I Parch Idenllicatbn (Folk) Numbrs: 00111410006 Granw SS r: 467336734 * ** 2452526 OR: 2521 PG: 0105 NICONIO in OFFICIAL 11COIOS of COLL111 CoORT, IL 01 125/1151 At 01:IIAN OsIGIT 1. IIOC1, CL111 COSO 115000.00 file 111 1.00 DOC•.10 $75.00 lets: GOLISHOU Mill CO FLex OF AIaVE THM LM FO rEWndNn THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 17th ay of March, A.D. 1999 by Robert Vernon Griffin, a single man, and Hazel P. Griffin, a single women, hereln called the grantor., to Robert E. Williams, a single person .no" Pon of address is 3410 6th Avenue SW, Naples, Florida 34117, hareanahr caved the Ganes: Iwn«w« urw MnM M. wrm •yr.vor• u,a •P.no.• bcwa, w M. ,lasses re inn bnr„m.nr eras ,n. n.M,, bytl ........nu....ne gw.NVW. war tlw ,ucaneu ant mqn, a, mirynyanq W 1 T N E S S E T H: That the grantors, for and In consideration of the turn of TEN AND 00I100'S (610.0) Dollars and ~ veWDle e,f alertlbns. moot whereol is horribly acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, soft, dens, remtes, rala iso, corners and oonem, unto the grant" N that c"In land alluan In COLLIER County. Stsls of Fbr:a, va: The Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast IN of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 47, Township 47 South, Range 47 East, Collier County, Florid@, less the South 30 feet thereof reserved for road purposes and except the right-of-wiry for State Road 616. This property Is vacant land and does not cOmtltute the homestead property of the Grantors. TOGMER, wall as the wane As, h11#00,ftlents and TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the sane or in wywte appensnsag. AND, pie worrom hereby co.anant with sold gran ' laalrlh's kj]+1 lL arewlulfy wed of sold land In res ssnple; that the grantors haw good ,bed and awful Wlh6ray to sea and eon d, and hereby warrant the Asia to said land and will defend dy acme agaewt iM larMl ean, M all persons whomaoew; and that hid lend Is hr of as ,,cumbrances, excepl Lore accruing albasgwM W Decanter 31, 109e. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the sold grantors hew stoned and wed these presents the ay and year first wow .00. Sgnae,Bad and d"W In the WaShOe of. 7 At %" (, Robert Vernon Griffin P O. Boa 000421, Naples, Florida 34116 Milo WYwa K Is aO Name Hazel . OrUfln P O. Boa W042L Naptr. Fbrkla 34116 7� U STATE DF FLORIDA } SOUNTY OF COLLIER Jf �L Wesson lapong banunnrnr was acknowledged below me Nk �1 "` der o� 4Wnon GAMS and 14,1 P. GrMln no we prsonaly Mown 4 M W have ]gtt ,¢1�'r r(a, LISA R GRANT Nat 'J Ie `I CCA MM" I CC 44y6y1 CCCII) a� Oelaq� 16 1"9 DrY My Cvmisbn EpM: �Fgo AIUNnCION0MCo.,.NC FY a Ma1L Nobly Signature THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: __. Sylvia Slaver '•dfshore Title Company, L.C. 41 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: 00111240005 Grantee SS t: 267335734 ABOVE THIS LINE FOR MOOFFINO THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 17th day of March, A.D. 1999 by Robert Vernon Griffin, a single man, and Hazel P. Griffin, a single woman, herein celled the grantors, to Robert E. Williams, a single person whose post oaks address Is 3240 5th Avenue SW, Naples, Florida 34117, hereinafter celled the Grant.: (WI, ... ..r...d herein he ,um. -e,.moi .na branl.: mclud. an he v.ruu ,o ml. m.,,um,m .rte he here, I.,I ,.o,... mdlvldml., Tod m..uvc..eo,. a,d a.aOr,. o, .......ronq W I T N E S S E T H: That the grantors, tar and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100 -S ($10.00) Dollars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain lend sltuale In COLLIER County, State of Florida. viz: The Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 114 of Section 27, Township 47 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, less the South 30 feel thereof reserved for road purposes and except the right -of -way for State Road 846. This property is vacant land and does not constitute the homestead property of the Grantors. TOGETHER, wah all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the some In fee simple forever. AND, the grantors hereby covenant with said grantee that the grantors are lawfully seized of said lend N fee simple; that the grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said lend, and hereby warrant the this to said land and will defend the same against the lawful clams of all persons whomsoever and that said lend Is hee of all encumbrances, except Was accruing subsequent to December 31, 1998. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantors have signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered 61 the presence of: L.S. Witless #1 Sig to Robert Vernon Griffin P O. Box 990428, Naples, Florida 34116 Winne Wilne. nature it C= t—ruL Witnes—s 02 Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ��{{, The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this I f . • da, Vernon Griffin and Hazel P. Griffin who are personally known to me or I Identification. SEAL (y� USA A GRANT > va C Wilslon 1 CG 1999 EspIN sexhallmi46 My Commission ExpBes: gr 0~1C BONDING CO., INC. File ♦ we110 ri P L.S. P. Hazel Griffin P O. Box 990428, Naples, Florida 34116 Printed Notary Signature E R' JBIT VG�Jii,5 M, IMMI: 11i'lill !Wij� I Jill Ell LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson P.A. and) Grady Minor and Assoc P.A. (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified ' the Application. Signed: ���4 Q�Zl _ � (Name of Owner(s) of Record) Date: I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. pp Signature of Applicant JCo ber � L LJt l l l•,4 � s Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF ( P-OR.I P A ) COUNTY OF ( CocLIER ) Sworn to ay subscribed before me this 8 7I4 By D -- -- (No ary Public) CH OfdSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath day of _B Pk/ L _, 2005 MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: as identification Sherry D. Lorca MYCOMMISSIONB DD235371 EXPIRES =•.• '� September 26, 2007 °�„of S4°,�'• BONDED THRU TROY LAIN INSURANCE INC NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 02/2002 M EETIN6,1NOT :iATE MEETING NOTES COLLIER COUNTY TOPIC OF MEETING C,,,,4EA : V1111,A 5. ±i�U'GS. PU Llly,, 114-ul %��'sfl�'�nl— /�w+ -. ATTIEN'DANCE(pr/i�nt name clearly) WAyh6 .4} pty KEY POINTS /UNDERSTANDINGS /CONCLUSIONS J'Vi(io% J^liv�iG/e . SGa n /7 �Dtin �iw�p Z �Y�s. G -2 l t y ca. it g- 1, -Qmf, /,// iV ' Avd Cs %. GZ s`rve �sds. / ' O N ?.A e.. f J-es . 4 P li ctir X5"lj . /V Ott" W '1-o Je he/k rn i��f/Lr�, iv Sen'c ,�r'� "E'et 4 Un 'kna� b„, -1-. of pp— / i.. Xv a Vill"ej /711 • :feria �✓eic cn * * ** DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT * * ** Il TIME `� - EDs— NOTES BY TOPIC OF MEETING C,,,,4EA : V1111,A 5. ±i�U'GS. PU Llly,, 114-ul %��'sfl�'�nl— /�w+ -. ATTIEN'DANCE(pr/i�nt name clearly) WAyh6 .4} pty KEY POINTS /UNDERSTANDINGS /CONCLUSIONS J'Vi(io% J^liv�iG/e . SGa n /7 �Dtin �iw�p Z �Y�s. G -2 l t y ca. it g- 1, -Qmf, /,// iV ' Avd Cs %. GZ s`rve �sds. / ' O N ?.A e.. f J-es . 4 P li ctir X5"lj . /V Ott" W '1-o Je he/k rn i��f/Lr�, iv Sen'c ,�r'� "E'et 4 Un 'kna� b„, -1-. of pp— / i.. Xv a Vill"ej /711 • :feria �✓eic cn o GR'SifG; Ga— l r'w c /Rr JJ �l/s § /��• GF i �� _ vD /n,',L P 0' a. Te ham. 1t �v rzs t. *. 'Air Agenda Item 4N Coi[�ier Corz-vmy STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2007 RE: PETITION NO. CP- 2005 -13, COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMUNITY SERVICE SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT /APPLICANT /OWNERS: Agent: Robert L. Duane, AICP Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Applicants: Pastor David Mallory First Assembly Ministries 3805 The Lord's Way Naples, FL 34114 Owner: First Assembly of God of Naples 3805 The Lord's Way Naples, FL 34114 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property contains 69 acres more or less and is located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) — The Lord's Way intersection. The parcel lies within the Royal Fakapalm Planning Community in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida. (See attachment "A ") - 1 - Agenda Item 4N REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to change a portion of the "Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict ", " Urban - Mixed Use District ", "Urban Designation ", in order to establish the "Collier Boulevard Community Service Subdistrict." The proposed text change adds language under the Urban - Mixed Use District, [showing the petitioner's proposed amendments in strike - through /underline format, while current Growth Management Plan language appears in plain text], effectively removing the subject property from the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, as follows: Proposed Future Land Use Element Text Amendment: [page ? ?] A. Urban — Mixed Use District 17. Collier Boulevard Community Service Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a community setting to be compatible with the to provide a core of community services, such as church assembly halls chapels medical care units, doctor's offices, cafeterias gymnasiums administration offices a transportation building with vocational center and classrooms radio transmission center and tower, dormitories and church - related housing. The total floor area of the institutional buildings and church - related housing is approximately 368.000 square feet subiect to minor variations in this development for the essential services personnel (ESP). The market rate and ESP housing shall not exceed 296 sinole or multi - family units. participants, and the provision of public transportation facilities shall create a self- sufficient environment, minimizing the impacts of off -site traffic and other public services while serving the needs of the community at large. [STAFF NOTE: The proposed text language has been revised since initial submission of application materials. Please disregard the amendment entry appearing in Section IV of the Application Form, or other application materials. It is also important to consider, in both text and mapping, that 10 acre portion of the subject property which is deliberately omitted from this request. These considerations extend to all applicable text, any related mapping, the standing PUD, and so forth.] PURPOSE/ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this project is to establish the "Collier Boulevard Community Service Subdistrict" so as to accommodate a future Planned Unit Development rezone to allow mixed use, residential and institutional development. The petitioner proposes to develop a maximum of 306 2- Agenda Item 4N dwelling units and provide a maximum 368,000 square feet for institutional uses and community services. These institutional uses and community services include places of worship — an 1,800 seat church and 600 seat chapel — 400 congregate care units, a private school for 300 K -12 students, a 450 child day care center and ancillary uses and structures. 10 housing units incidental to providing these services are for clergy, church employees, church - related staff, and other personnel related to programs offered on -site. This proposed Subdistrict comprises 69 of the 79 acres already in a Planned Unit Development — approved previously by Ordinance 94 -59. These 69 acres will be part of the future PUD rezone mentioned above. The 10 acre remainder which is presently undeveloped will eventually be removed from the PUD. Twenty -three of the 69 acres will consist of 150 residences reserved for essential services personnel working in Collier County, and up to 146 more residences. Ten church - related dwelling units for employees and staff will be located on the remaining acreage along with other existing and proposed church and church - related institutional and community service land uses. Vehicular access will be provided via The Lord's Way. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: The subject property is currently zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development (First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus). The 79.1 -acre PUD is approved for a mixture of land uses for religious, community social services and residential uses in a campus -type setting, including: 1800 seat auditorium, 600 seat chapel, 300 student school (K -12), 450 child /adult care facility, 400 bed care unit facility, 120 travel trailer or park model lots, adult living facility for 400 group housing units, and 57 multi - family units along with numerous inside and outside recreational facilities and accessory uses. All of the PUD - permitted land uses have not been developed. A 12.3 acre portion of the PUD is a preserve area, where exotics have been removed and its habitat potential enhanced. The subject property is bisected by a utility easement and power transmission lines running north - south. Four lake excavations total about 8.7 surface acres. A major canal lies along the Collier Boulevard frontage. The current Future Land Use Designation is Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: N - ZONING: Across The Lord's Way, A, Rural Agricultural DESCRIPTION: Undeveloped Land. FLUM DESIGNATION: Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict -3- Agenda Item 4N S- ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural; Hammock Park Commerce Center Commercial PUD at Rattlesnake Hammock Road DESCRIPTION: Undeveloped, Vacant & Residential Land Uses; Commercial Land Uses at Rattlesnake Hammock Road FLUM DESIGNATION: Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, at Rattlesnake Hammock Road E - ZONING: A, Rural Agricultural, Swamp Buggy Grounds PUD Swamp Buggy Sports Facility FLUM DESIGNATION: Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Agricultural /Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands, Belle Meade NRPA, beyond W - ZONING: Across Collier Boulevard, Naples Lakes Country Club PUD Residential — Golf Course Community FLUM DESIGNATION: Urban Residential Subdistrict STAFF ANALYSIS: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DATA AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue... the Department will review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the consistency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the 0 Agenda Item 4N review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. Environmental Impacts: The Protected Species Survey submitted by Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. with this petition is dated March 2006. At the northwest quadrant, a 12.3 acre portion of the PUD is a preserve area, where exotics have been removed and its habitat potential enhanced. As a result, protected species have begun to utilize this area. None were observed during field surveying, but it would be expected that wading birds may utilize the onsite wetlands. As part of a previous survey conducted in accordance with a 1997 ERP Permit, results reported that there were no Red - Cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) or nest cavity trees observed on site or on adjacent viewed properties. There was a sighting of a little blue heron — the only listed species observed. Environmental Specialists in the Environmental Service Department reviewed this request and stated, [t]he subject property has no special environmental concerns which would prevent it from being added as a new Subdistrict. Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Analysis: The petitioner employed the firm of Metro Transportation Group, Inc. to conduct a Comparative Traffic Analysis for the proposed amendment. As the analysis points out, the elimination of 120 TTRV units and 400 care units and the addition of 296 multi - family [dwelling] units results in a general population decrease when compared to the existing PUD zoning. The existing PUD - permitted population of 1144 for these units would be replaced by 746 people with the new arrangement The difference is estimated to represent a decrease in population of 398. Staff points out that since the initial Subdistrict application materials were prepared and submitted, the petitioner has re- introduced ten (10) dwelling units reserved for church employees and church - related personnel, representing 25 additional residents. This change equates to an addition of 306 dwelling units (not 296), still resulting with a general population decrease. The existing PUD - permitted population of 1144 for these units would be replaced by 771 people (not 746) with the new arrangement. The difference is estimated to represent a decrease in population of 373 (not 398). This overall decrease in population does not translate directly to a decrease in trips generated or traffic attributed, as not all previous traffic counts were vested or committed. An actual net trip increase results from GMP revisions. The 2,815 estimated trips per day increases to 3,870. These trips are generally split equally to north and south at Collier Boulevard. About 17% of the northbound trips remain on Collier, while the majority turns onto westbound Davis Boulevard. About 20% of the southbound trips remain on Collier, while the majority turns onto westbound Rattlesnake Hammock Road. 5- Agenda Item 4N Traffic on these first road segments of Davis and Rattlesnake Hammock Roads west of Collier significantly impacts their Levels of Service, along with Collier Boulevard segments immediately north and south of The Lord's Way. Sufficient capacity is available to all roadway segments except Davis Boulevard west of Collier. Davis Boulevard will have sufficient capacity when programmed improvements widen it to six lanes. However, Davis Boulevard is no longer programmed in the CIE Schedule of Capital Improvements or funded at this time. Existing Levels of Service on impacted roadway segments are: Collier Blvrd — Davis Blvrd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd LOS C Collier Blvrd — Rattlesnake Hammock Rd to US 41 LOS C Davis Blvrd — Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd LOS D Rattlesnake Hammock Rd — Polly Ave to Collier Blvrd LOS E The adopted minimum LOS Standard for these impacted road segments is D. Rattlesnake Hammock Road is currently deficient but is programmed for construction remedies. The Metro Transportation Group analysis stated, "the trip generation of the existing PUD will be increased by 60 trips in the AM peak hour and 60 trips in the PM peak hour traffic. Two -way daily trips will increase by 1,055..." to total 3,870 trips daily. Another 1,845 daily trips are figured to never leave the site and are considered "internal capture" trips, as explained below. Proposed Subdistrict language states, "[tjhe combination of community social services, church - related housing, market rate housing, housing proposed for essential services personnel (ESP), employees, volunteers and program participants, and the provision of public transportation facilities shall create a self- sufficient environment, minimizing the impacts of off -site traffic and other public services, while serving the needs of the community at large ". This proposition for providing institutional uses and community services on -site to "create a self- sufficient environment" is represented by an "internal capture" study within the Comparative Traffic Analysis. Summarizing from the study, it should be noted that a significant portion of traffic generated for the property never leave the site. This traffic, referred to as the "internal capture" traffic, was accounted for in the study. The existing PUD accounted for an internal capture reduction of 40% to the AM peak hour traffic, 50% to the PM peak hour traffic, and 45% to the daily traffic generated. However, this internal capture rate will likely be reduced as a result of the additional housing units proposed as part of this GMPA. Transportation planning staff has reviewed this petition's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), and added the following comments: The TIS indicates that there is a significant impact to Davis Boulevard between Santa Barbara Boulevard and CR 951 and this segment is currently failing and is not programmed to be widened in the County's CIE or the FDOT's five year work program. Based on the analysis, this project is not consistent with the sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element and 1.1.2 in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. Agenda Item 4N • Transportation is working with property owners north and south of this development to try and establish another north south corridor east of CR 951 and would like to work with this developer to reserve a right -of -way corridor for a future four lane facility. This roadway, if it can get developed, may help provide the mitigation that is needed to meet the Growth Management Plan requirements. Public Facilities Impact: The petitioner prepared a Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis which was submitted with this petition. Application materials indicate this project will result in decreased impacts upon public facilities other than roads (potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, community and regional parks). For potable water, the proposed development reduces demand by 20,300 gallons per day. Sanitary sewer demands are reduced by 39,800 gallons per day. Solid waste demands are reduced by 494 tons. A Water Management Plan for the existing PUD is in place. The modifications to land use are expected to have little effect on the basic drainage system. The decrease in population of 373 persons would result in a reduced demand for parks accordingly. Utilizing the level of service standards identified in the CIE, this project would not impact the County's existing Levels of Service Standards (LOSS). Appropriateness of Change: The 79 acre First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus PUD was approved with a 30,000 square foot church (auditorium) seating 1,800, a 20,000 square foot church (chapel) seating 600, 57 residential dwelling units, 400 congregate care units, 400 -bed assisted living facilities, 120 TTRV camp sites, a private school for 300 K -12 students, and a 450 child day care center. This Subdistrict encompasses 69 of those acres. The remaining 10 acres of the existing PUD are not included in the proposed Subdistrict. This presently undeveloped 10 -acre remainder will be removed from the PUD. Those land uses proposed to remain within the new Subdistrict include the 30,000 square foot church (auditorium) seating 1,800, the 20,000 square foot church (chapel) seating 600, 10 residential dwelling units, 400 congregate care units, the private school for 300 K -12 students, and the 450 child day care center. Plans for the 400 -bed assisted living facilities, and the 120 TTRV camp sites will not be part of the Subdistrict. Of the 120 campsites, 23 have been developed and are occupied. These are to be eliminated within three (3) years. The 47 remaining residential dwelling units will be increased to 296, of which 150 are earmarked for Collier County essential services personnel; these persons are recognized to be in particular need and demand. At the same time Collier County is experiencing a critical shortage of affordable housing for these people employed by occupations or professions considered essential — including teachers, educators, other school district employees, community college and university employees, police and fire personnel, health care personnel, -7- Agenda Item 4N skilled building trades personnel and government employees (all earning up to 140 percent of area median income), as well as all other full -time employees earning less the 80 percent of area median income. Approval of this proposed amendment will provide an avenue to request zoning approval for up to 296 dwelling units. Per the applicant, but not stated in the proposed Subdistrict text, 150 of these 296 units are targeted for ownership by these personnel; and, of these 150 units, 70 would be for those earning 80 to 140% of median income, 10 units for those earning less that 80% of median income, and the remaining 70 units would be at market rate. Therefore, of the total 296 dwelling units, 216 would be market rate (73 %) and 80 units would be for those earning :5140% of median income (27 %). However, given that the existing Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict allows 1.5 dwelling units per acre, the 69 -acre subject property is eligible for 104 dwelling units. Given this base residential density of 104, the "bonus" requested through this Growth Management Plan amendment is 192 dwelling units. Therefore, of these 192 dwelling units, the 80 units targeted for those earning :5140% of median income represents 42 %. Staff points out the agreement to provide affordable and workforce housing to essential services personnel is not on record. The status of the agreement between the Collier County Essential Services Personnel Housing Group and the housing developer establishing the program linking the housing to the proper personnel and constructing these residences is unknown. Additionally, this project was not chosen by the Florida Department of Community Affairs for participation in the Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot (C -WHIP) Program. The County's [EAR- upgraded] annual affordable housing goal is to increase by at least fifteen percent the number of units approved to be built per year, but not less than 1,000 such dwelling units per year pursuant to Objective 2 of the Housing Element. Financial Administration and Housing Department staff concurs with the petitioner that Collier County is experiencing a shortage of affordable and workforce housing and that the shortage is substantiated by two separate studies. The Comprehensive Planning staff conferred with the Financial Administration and Housing Department staff regarding Policy 5.1 of the Housing Element which states "Affordable housing will be distributed equitably throughout the County using strategies which include, but are not limited to, density bonus agreements, and impact fee waivers or deferrals. In addition, affordable housing will be located where adequate infrastructure and services are available." Their staff did not believe that anything in Policy 5.1 negatively affects the recommendation of this new project. Below are some projects and provisions in the Urban Residential Fringe that allow a greater intensity than the typical 1.5 du /ac. scenario. 1. The Swamp Buggy Days a/k/a Florida Sports Park is a 129 -acre PUD. The Swamp Buggy PUD is approved for intense out -of -doors sports and recreational activities, including swamp buggy races and a gun shooting range. Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Activity Center #7 is located to the south of the subject property at Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard (CR -951) and will allow for commercial rezoning (C -1 through C -5 zoning districts) and development. Agenda Item 4N 3. Growth Management Plan Amendment CP- 2002 -1 was approved to expand the "activity center" subdistrict located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) and Sports Park Road (Activity Center #7). The area added comprises 18.46± acres and is immediately contiguous to the eastern limit of the original activity center boundary. The approved uses are limited to: "personal indoor self- storage facilities, offices for various contractor /builder construction trade specialists inclusive of the offices of related professional disciplines and services, warehouse space for various contractor /builder construction trade occupants and related businesses including but not limited to lumber and other building materials dealers, paint, glass, and wallpaper stores, garden supply stores as accessory uses only." Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. 4. The Urban Designation allows for support medical facilities (such as physicians' offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers, and pharmacies provided the dominate use is medically related) to locate within 1/4m ile of existing or approved hospitals or medical centers which offer primary and urgent care treatment for all types of injuries and traumas. Accordingly, if a hospital is approved and built, then the surrounding lands within a 1/4 mile could potentially be zoned and developed with support medical uses. Physicians Regional Medical Center recently opened and is located in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. 5. The base residential density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre can be increased by up to 6.0 dwelling units per acre via the Affordable - Workforce Housing Density Bonus, for a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre for one specific property in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. This property is known as the Rockedge PUD, and was rezoned in 2006 with a gross density of 5.23 du /ac. Also, the net density of some projects found in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict is much higher than the allowed gross density of 1.5 du /ac. For example, the San Marino PUD has a net density three times the allowable gross density (352 du's; 235 acres total, less 156 acres of golf course and preserves; 352 du's on 79 acres = 4.45 du /ac. net density). Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. In light of the net residential densities, non - residential uses and increased densities allowed elsewhere in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, staff recognizes these as indicators of future development in this Subdistrict — as well as the new Collier Boulevard Community Service Subdistrict — that would be compatible and support this type of development. Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis: The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was conducted December 14, 2006, after the agent/applicant duly noticed and advertised the meeting. Approximately 50 people attended the NIM, held at the First Assembly of God Church, 3805 The Lord's Way, and heard the following information: The petitioner, Bill Klohn, of MDG Capital Corporation, and representative Robert Duane, of Hole Montes, spoke throughout the information meeting. They began with overviews of the proposed project and of the State of Florida's Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Agenda Item 4N (C -WHIP) Program. The 150 C -WHIP housing units will make up phase one of the residential development. The structure of the program providing housing to essential services personnel disallows the 'flipping' of properties. [Staff Note: This project was not chosen for participation in the State of Florida's Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot (C- WHIP) Program.] Landscaping upgrades to The Lord's Way, a third lake, and the shared responsibility for landscaping maintenance were discussed. Pastor Malory of FAOG Church addressed the audience, explaining that many of the parts of the land's uses were already approved by PUD — the 368,000 square feet of church related uses, including three -story administrative and residential buildings. The travel trailers present would be removed, and an institutional care facility would be reduced by approximately 400 beds. Mr. Klohn explained the co -oping arrangement of housing ownership. This co -op style of ownership would be in perpetuity, not for just a limited time like 30 years. The value of the housing is capped by a two percent increase per owner per unit, when sold. This co -op arrangement also limits ownership to a three year period, as residents move on to market rate housing elsewhere, and their affordable unit is again available for other ESP. Audience speakers commented how this co -op arrangement seems to be a "revolving door" development, where ESP residents would be forced to move out every three years —just when they may be settling into their new homes. Mr. Klohn explained that this time limit is part of the ESP Group's arrangement, and suggested those concerned take this issue to the ESP Group for their reconsideration. Some audience members spoke about their concerns with existing residents of this neighborhood entering the Naples Lakes community, directly west, across Collier Boulevard. They are noticeable biking, walking or making their way to a CAT bus stop from the church property. Pastor Malory agreed that he would address these comments as separate security issues if these people would contact him directly. Another concern voiced by audience members related to traffic safety concerns at the intersection of The Lord's Way at Collier Boulevard. The increasing amount of traffic on Collier Boulevard and the increase in turning maneuvers from these new residents will need attention. Many thought full signalization would be warranted as these residences are built. Mr. Klohn presented illustrations of the one, two and three bedroom floor plans — highlighting the "livable" layout in each unit's design. People voiced their concern regarding how many people would be allowed in these dwelling units. They felt that if not controlled in some manner, residents would take advantage of some of the larger residences' size and layout for more than just one family. Mr. Klohn discussed this concern at length and committed to limit the number of persons per unit in some manner. [Synopsis prepared by L Koehler, Public Information Coordinator, and C. Schmidt, Principal Planner] 10- Agenda Item 4N FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: • The proposed uses will allow development generally compatible with uses on surrounding properties. The subject property is presently zoned PUD to accommodate a 30,000 square foot church (auditorium) seating 1,800, a 20,000 square foot church (chapel) seating 600, 57 residential dwelling units, 400 congregate care units, 400 -bed assisted living facilities, 120 TTRV camp sites, a private school for 300 K -12 students, and a 450 child day care center. The proposed FLUE amendment results with a net decrease to residential density and overall intensity by removing the 400 -bed assisted living facilities, and the 120 TTRV camp sites. • Provision of-I 50 essential services personnel or affordable- workforce housing units help reach the County's [EAR- upgraded] annual affordable housing goal to increase by at least fifteen percent the number of units approved to be built per year pursuant to Objective 2 of the Housing Element. • The existing PUD accounts for an internal capture reduction of 40% to the AM peak hour traffic, 50% to the PM peak hour traffic, and 45% to the daily traffic generated. However, these capture rates will likely be reduced as a result of the additional housing units proposed as part of this GMPA. • The subject property accesses one collector road — Collier Boulevard. • Sufficient capacity is available to all roadway segments except Davis Boulevard west of Collier Boulevard. Davis Boulevard will have sufficient capacity when programmed improvements widen it to six lanes. Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Polly Avenue to Collier Boulevard is currently deficient but is programmed for construction remedies. • As a result of this amendment there are no significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the CIE, with respect to Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater Drainage, Solid Waste, Community and Regional Parks facilities. There is however, significant impact to Davis Boulevard between Santa Barbara Boulevard and CR 951. Transportation Planners are working with the property owner to provide the mitigation that is needed to meet the Growth Management Plan requirements. • Approval of this petition may lead to other requests for increased density, or non- residential uses, on nearby properties. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP- 2005 -13 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Florida Department of Community of Affairs. INfRI Agenda Item 4N Staff recommends this approval with further modifications to the proposed language, noted below in double strike - through /double underline format, as follows: A. Urban — Mixed Use District 17. Collier Boulevard Community Eacility SepAee Subdistrict = Z•1[It1�f.7T / /:�iiCf�1. - . , a u . .:. - . 1 - • 1 loll a self- sufficient environment, which lessens a impacts upon the external transportation network and public services. , while serving the needs of the community at large. • Allowable QQ[no3unity facilitiQs such as 1 ■' • • p housing uses, ulivate Child care facilitie5- 3) Residential dwellino units. not to exQead-aQ5-unLts, Essential er 5) Parks open space, and recreational -uses, c. The maximum floor _ _ for the Subdistrict, excludino residential units, shall not exceed 368,000 • _ feet. 12- Agenda Item 4N QL Prepared By: Date: Corby L. S hmidt, Principal Planner Comprehei sive Planning Department r , / Reviewed By: \ G. Wes" Date: David C. Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: Date: Randall J. Coh n, AICP, Director Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: e � _Date: Marjo M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney Agenda Item 4N Z - 20 -t9-7 Zr 2a- 0 7 -2d -J'� Approved By: Date: ose h K. Schmitt, Administrator o unity Development and Environmental Services Division PETITION NO.: CP- 2005 -13 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007 CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007 BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, Chairman FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT (FLUE) Prepared for the FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH PREPARED BY: ROBERT L. DUANE, A.I.C.P. HOLE MONIES, INC. 950 ENCORE WAY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 HM PROJECT 2005054 MAY, 2006 LIST OF EXHIBITS FOR THE COLLIER BLVD COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT V.A.1 LOCATION MAP V.A.2 AERIAL PHOTO 8 Yz x 11 (24 X 36 INCLUDED LASTLY) V.A.3 SUMMARY OF LAND USE & ZONING V.B.1 MAP OF EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION V.B.1 -A PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP 8/z x It (24 X 36 INCL. LASTLY) V.C.1 AERIAL/FLUCCS MAP V.C.2 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES DATA V.C.3 HISTORIC & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES MAP V.C.3 -A ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES LETTER V.D.5 SUITABILITY OF LAND USE V.E.1a,b SEWER & WATER SERVICE LEVEL ANALYSIS V.E.lc ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS LOS V.D.ld DRAINAGE V.D.le SOLID WASTE V.D.lf PARKS: COMMUNITY & REGIONAL V.E.2 EXISTING FACILITIES & SERVICES V.E.3 EFFECT ON SCHOOLS, FIRE, & EMS V.F.l FIRM MAP V.G.4 PROOF OF OWNERSHIP (COPY OF DEEDS) V.G.5 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE OWNERS MISCELLANEOUS EXHIBITS V.C.6 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD PUD ORDINANCE V.C.7 SFWMD PERMIT CONDITIONS V.C.8 USACOE PERMIT CONDITIONS APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone 941 - 403 -2300 (Fax 941 -643- 6968). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941- 403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant Pastor David Mallory Company First Assembly Ministries Mailing Address 3805 The Lord's Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34114 Phone Number 239 - 774 -1165 Fax Number 239 - 774 -0538 B. Name of Agent " Robert L. Duane "THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Hole Montes, Inc. Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239 - 254 -2000 Fax Number 239 - 254 -2099 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record First Assembly of God Naples Address 3805 The Lord's Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34114 Phone Number 239 - 774 -1165 Fax Number 239 - 774 -0538 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, H.\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 1 - environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. GMP Application Submittal prepared by Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P., of Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 (239) 254 -2000 Traffic Analysis prepared by Robert L. Price, E. I., Project Consultant and Ted B. Treesh, Principal /Regional Manager Metro PCS, 2700 Immokalee Rd., Naples, FL 34110 239 - 596 -8550 Rae Ann Boylan, President of Environmental Consultants, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33912 (239) 418 -0671 II. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION insert data provided by applicant A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address, Office Percentage of Stock First Assembly of God of Naples. Inc. Non Profit J. David Mallory President Non Profit Rebecca Mallory, Secretary Non Profit Ed Cassette Treasurer Non Profit C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. H12005\2005054\W13\13MP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -2- Name and Address Percentage of Ownership MDG Fountain Lakes, LLC 100% Patrick McCuan LLC 49% William L. Klohn 49% MDG Capital Corporation 2% E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers elow, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership G. Date subject property acquired (X) leased ( ):_Term of lease _yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. H:\2005\2005054\WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -3- III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 14 50 26 W %z OF S''% OF NW %a W %2 OF E'% OF S'/ OFNW%,W' /OFE %z OF E/2 OF S/2 OF NW Y4 LESSR/W B. Section: 14 Township: 50 Range: 26 C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 00416560008 D. GENERAL LOCATION Property is on the east side of Collier Boulevard approximately one -half mile north of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. E. PLANNING COMMUNITY Royal Fakapalm F. TAZ 359 G. SIZE IN ACRES ±69 acres H. ZONING First Assembly of God PUD I. PRESENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict N. TYPE OF REQUEST A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT(S) OR SUB- ELEMENT(S)TO BE AMENDED: X Future Land Use Golden Gate Area Master Plan Immokalee Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Transportation Housing Coastal & Conservation Recreation /Open Space Intergovernmental Coord. Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste Drainage Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. AMEND PAGE(S) 31_3. OF THE Future Land Use ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use-GrG&&4+reug4s to identify language to be deleted, Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: psychological and spiritual needs of its residents in a church - sponsored rehabilitation and The combination of community social services housing available for employees volunteers and program participants and the provision of public transportation facilities shall create a H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 4 - self- sufficient campus -type environment minimizing the impacts on off -site traffic and other public services, while serving the needs of the community at large. 2. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM: Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict TO: Collier Boulevard Community Service Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Not Applicable E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN 1" =400'. At least one copy reduced to 8 % x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. /ate A_1219111,1119 Z 1. Exhibit V.A.1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. Exhibit V.A.2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. Exhibit V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. Exhibit V.B.1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. Exhibit V.C.1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. Exhibit V.C.2 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). 3. Exhibit V.C.3 Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. H:\2005 \2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 5 - D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. No Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)(2), F.A.C.). If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. No Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S. ? 3. No Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a) 4.b, F.A.C.) 4. No Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Yes -SEE EXHIBIT V.D.S. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V. E. 1 a1 Potable Water Exhibit V. E. 1 b► Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V. E. 1 c) Arterial & Collector Roads: Name specific road and LOS Exhibit V. D. 1 d) Drainage Exhibit V. D. 1 e) Solid Waste Exhibit V. D. 1 f) Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5) 2. Exhibit V. E. 2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services.) 3. Exhibit V. E. 3 Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 6 - Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. Exhibit V.F.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 2. N/A Location of well fields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Attached $16,450.00 (non - refundable filing fee less $250 pre - application fee) made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. N/A $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. Attached Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. Exhibit V.G.4 Proof of ownership (Copy of deed) 5. Exhibit V.G.5 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) 6. Attached 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. *Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 " =400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. H: \2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 7 - Exhibit V,*., ue'v,a/Iu 1111 .`m.* tm*'^y�"..°:m'w��/amrr,,.' o:umo5\2oo5oo4xmpx»w\p«monumom\3mwewmowp application FINAL rev oro3ouno.00c '8' jr'x, nn/` � r� � --— `~~-----~—~-------- —�| / | ' � N ��--�|---'------�-- o:umo5\2oo5oo4xmpx»w\p«monumom\3mwewmowp application FINAL rev oro3ouno.00c '8' � it o:umo5\2oo5oo4xmpx»w\p«monumom\3mwewmowp application FINAL rev oro3ouno.00c '8' Exhibit Y. A.2 Most Rey nt Aenal of subiea bn +rdnnas srwirs end lain H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - g - j1 y�qy a r e a � `t WN f , d Y d Y �•'Y � 41 �1! J F >� �M. h. xhibi91,U.1 Atapof,ml (tt !.I our, I arw I,,, I),- gnmwa«.,q %uhlcit proltcm aril adla.rot lends . wth totak lol cn:h I: III, l d,, 3o I_tuu +m an the v!:bl�l I lnnlam Ih,�nw, >lJ,,,t 1ai3O, "0,,ra, I . . o ohm Ih, 1 d., G'.�.dr rt! 1 _II1 nn >nhJutrt�,r �7 4 t�1N pe�gvr q. ua N +a`Q' us M-1 � 4 .accm"w - kWY 4taw�tlpk u7• �_] ke rAla_oenuurto. '� V(Mipt�kTq� OE.gJlrtp Y.*9UA NO . GSCW fkk14116[ GC &w.anirei °civ.. H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 11 - L TB i TNf Till TN 1 1 TN 1 IN TN f I TN 1 yiya� 10 [T17 ; a = X c ' i r co C . r - itog; OW r" b ::. .. ' . 1 i ... _' ... I ��! ' Sl P' It'll l I s e1 I I l�lip ... _ : , :: �!I � Il RI� IMCIIP�I . . ;1l . 0 ! L .. y :❑ ❑ ❑ °° . - vio coon+ I__i N1 1N1 1N1 fN1 fN IL fN1 1itI !M1 a�1 N Exhibit V.C.1 Most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. r v L: rc ±' m c� c r�> H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 1 2 - i ti t: �l %, G t'� � 7 '� !�� � + �� t t i T F _� � 1 I ��"�' _ - �\it�� f �.. '�.'� - . - ....�na..... I� C m r..� l � "�L " t�~\y 1 .�.�' 1y'.�l }yam .t i Exhibit V.C.2 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD MINISTRIES Protected Species Survey onsultants, c. lVe0nnd & Wildlfe Svrveyse' - onmenlal Permitting, lmpacf ssessmen[s 1 1000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida, 33912 Phone: (239) 4 18-0671 Fax: (239) 418-0672 March 14. 2006 INTRODUCTION An environmental scientist from Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc conducted a field investigation within the 12.30 acre preserve area on the 68.80± acre First Assembly of God property on March 13, 2006. The purpose of this field investigation was to identify the presence of protected species. This area had been enhanced and exotics were removed. As a result protected species may have begun to utilize this area. The survey was conducted between the hours of 11:30 am and 1:00 pm. During the site inspection on March 13, 2006 the temperature was in the 80's ranging from 80.1017 to 82 °F. It was partly cloudy outside with a 15 mph south southeasterly breeze. The site is located in portions of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. Specifically, it is located along the east side of CR -951 and approximately three- quarters of a mile north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR -846) in Naples. SURVEY METHODOLOGY The preserve area was surveyed for the presence of listed species in accordance with the overlapping belt transects method as outlined by Kevin L. Erwin, Consulting Ecologists Inc.. This method is comprised of a several step process. First, vegetation communities or land -uses on the property or study area are delineated on an aerial photograph based on nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Next, the FLUCFCS codes or land -use types found on the property are cross - referenced with the Collier County Protected Species List. This protected species list names the species that have a probability of occurring in any particular FLUCFCS community. Then, each community is searched in the field for the species within that particular FLUCCS type. An intensive pedestrian survey is conducted using parallel belt transects that are approximately 10 -20 feet apart, depending upon both the thickness of vegetation and visibility, as a means of searching for plants and animals. In addition, periodic "stop-] ook-li sten" and quiet stalking methods are conducted for animals. Signs or sightings of these species are then recorded and are marked in the field with flagging tape. The table at end of this report lists the FLUCFCS communities found on the property and the corresponding species that have the potential of occurring in them. Transects were walked approximately as shown on the attached protected species survey map (Exhibit B). Particular attention was placed upon locating potential fox squirrel nests, locating RCW cavity trees, and eagle's nests within the forested portions of the property. Nearly 100 percent of the area that was considered as potential tortoise habitat was surveyed. SITE CONDITIONS On March 13, 2006 the temperature was in the 80's there was a light breeze with clear to partly cloudy skies. This property contains a church, developing lands, and a preserve area. This survey was conducted in order to identify the possible presence of protected species within the preserve. Listed below are the vegetation communities or land -uses identified on the entire property as shown on the attached FLUCCS map (Exhibit A). Portions of the italicized communities are found within the preserved area. See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation 1999) for definitions. 172 Religious facilities (approximately 5.30 acres) This community contains the First Assembly of God church and all associated facilities. 193 Urban Lands in Transition (approximately 36.71 acres) This area had been priorly cleared and filled. This community contained both finished structures and structures that are in the building process. The area currently contains construction equipment and trailers. Sidewalks and paved roadways could also be found throughout. 411 Pine Flatwoods (approximately 0.05 acres) This community was dominated by slash pine with a saw palmetto under -story. Widely scattered bracken fern and poison ivy were also present. Ceaser weed lined the perimeter of this area. 500 Lakes (approximately 8.62 acres) This community encompassed the onsite lakes that were most likely dugout for fill. 624 Pine- Cypress (approximately 4.27 acres) This community contained a canopy dominated by a mixture of cypress, and slash pine with widely scattered cabbage palms. The under -story included scattered swamp fern, saw grass, salt bush, myrsine, buck thorn, wax myrtle, corkwood, and various grasses. 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods (approximately 2.78 acres) This wetland community contained a sparse canopy comprised of scattered slash pine. Widely scattered cypress and cabbage palm could also be found. Several slash pine saplings were present. The under -story was dominated by a mixture of tick seed, love vine, pluchea rosea, xyris, scorpion's tail, panic grass, beak rush, wire grass, and flea bane. 643 Wet Prairie (approximately 5.36 acres) This community had a very sparse canopy that included widely scattered cypress, and slash pine. The under -story included saw grass, hydrocoryle, beak rush, xyris, broom sedge, wax myrtle, salt bush, .spike rush, tick seed, pluchea rosea, scorpions tail, wire grass, and panic grass. Slash pine saplings were also present in this area. 8146 Paved Walking Trail (approximately 0.51 acres) This community consisted of the portion of the paved walking trail that extended through the preserve area. Spanish needles could be found scattered along the edges of this trail. 832 Power Line Easement (approximately 5.19 acres) Table 1: FLUCCS COMMUNITIES FLUCCS DESCRIPTION ACRES 172 Religious Facilities 5.30 193 Urban Lands in Transition 36.72 411 * Pine Flatwoods 005 500 Lakes 162 624* Pine- Cypress Wetland 4.27 625* Hydric Pine Flatwoods 2.78 643* Wet Prairie 5.36 8146* Paved Walking Trail 0.51 832 Power Line Easement 5.19 68.80 * Communities found within the preserve SPECIES PRESENCE During our field survey for protected species within preserve area, we did not observe any listed or protected species. No tortoise burrows were identified. No nest -like structures were observed. We did observe burrows belonging to armadillos and other small mammals, which were not marked in the field, there was no evidence that these burrows were being used by gopher tortoises. While no wading birds were observed during the survey it would be expected that wading birds may utilize the onsite wetlands. Based on a review of the latest bald eagle nest site map for the 2002 -2003 season, no eagle nests were documented to occur close enough to impact the property. The nearest documented eagle nest was approximately over 3 miles to the northwest of the property. DIscussiON During the protected species survey, conducted within the preserve area, no protected species or signs thereof were identified. There was evidence of non - listed species usage; including that of hogs, raccoons, deer, rabbits, and other small mammals. Table 3 Protected species list according to FLU CCS category obtained from Lee County with corresponding field survey results. FLUCCS Potential Listed Species % Coverage Present Absent Density Visibility ft 172 NONE 193 NONE -- 411 Beautiful Pawpaw 100 X 20 Big C ress Fox Squirrel 100 X 20 Eastern Indigo Snake 100 X 20 Fakahatchee Burmannia 100 X 20 Florida Black Bear 100 X 20 Florida Coontie 100 X 20 Florida Panther 100 X 20 Gopher Fro 100 X 20 Go her Tortoise 100 _ X 20 Red- Cockaded Woodpecker 100 X 20 Satin leaf 100 X 20 Southeastern American Kestrel 100 X 20 Twisted Air Plant_ 100 X 20 500 American Alli ator 95 X 20 _ Everglades Mink 95 X 20 Lim kin 95 X 20 Little Blue Heron 95 X 20 Reddish Egret 95 X 20 Roseate Spoonbill 95 _ X 20 _ Snowy Egret 95 X 20 Tricolored 1leron 95 X 20 Gopher Frog 0 X 20 Little Blue Heron 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 _ X 20 624 American Alligator 90 X 20 Ever lades Mink _ 90 _ X _ 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 Florida Panther 90 X 20 625 American Alligator 90 X 20 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel 90 X 20 Everglades Mink 90 X 20 Florida Black Bear 90 X 20 _ Florida Panther _ 90 _ X 20 643 American Alligator _ 90 X 20 Ever�plades Mink 90__ X 20 _ _ Florida Sand hill Crane _ 90 X 20 Little Blue Heron _ 90 _ X _ 20 Litnpkin 90 X 20 Reddish Egret 90 X 20 _ Snail Kite _ 90 X 20 Snowy Egret 90 _ X 20 Tricolored Heron 90 _ X 20 Wood Stork _ 90 _ _ X 20 8146 1 NONE I __ -- __ 20 �., .i h +' ". �r(.y x . -xx° `A�cit ra•xwx; eIe• p7 �" 5�.,' ':iiiit �.i�i�a..M.. 9F � 2_ F 3t " � -.'L � t ♦" 1 .. 1 ,A l• .a M - i YY yy 4to ,I li Of low - I n m m° I �NAf7I �V0 a W W � a rz a�nc dvi a N J F F t2 qC o �"N z= 3m am Z op' Rg LL .5w W LLI C9 ao�_ (q ottwa �ai3ia U � p J h' O ry ry m� 0 i 0 V) ILI cr �_J•� L LL Q �C G LU F- cc z 8 m 0 q i • n ° � a a W p M W r w O 11� - O w O O vx W 1- ol� �nnnnnnnn � � CO 1 111 IIIIIIIIIII a 0 IIIII IIIII��III �� o Q Hill IIIIIIIIII o o � J d IIhII:I1 111111 m IIIIIIIII 111 w ....... .. .. o U) 1 1 1 1 111 161 1 Q CO Ir LL z �aII I U y U N U w O¢ p w 12Q,JQ FK 1 1 1 rvNn � �v`+'ryo V W c0 N Q w N c� E m i pm w z y o O J d QpN o��lo rQ m O d V a U n 3 C C Ip m O)O y N o F F c00 �� n m w w .>< d y z a O cz 2 v v G o W nn. m.p W O 11111 O d pl V C+ y fye[ dJ IIIII `p '� 5 _ N 11111 O c z �YLlirCi'fff LL .O C LL o f �p v v m V Gli U O C WW ep�p: 0Va11o1d wep:01 -9UOZ 9{ +eB 1aV ^W :9e1 a'YSSd\900NOpp pwaxsy luH \sPa.mdf31D3Br% Exhibit V.C.2 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SPECIES DATA The property was the subject of a 1997 ERP permit and the portion of the site that is to be further developed is already cleared and partially developed. It is presumed that all impacts to listed plant and animal species were mitigated through the prior wetland permitting of the subject property. (Attached is a summary table and miscellaneous endangered species and plant documents) 11/05/2005 13.28 2394100672 BOYLL'Vi EMfIRCMMENTAL PAGE 10 First Assembly of Ministries Lee County Section 14, Township 50 S, Range 26 E +4- 68A acres Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Survey Black Cap and Nape Solid White Cheek Patch Prepared By Yicoides borealis Boylan --;/ Emu - olunetrr -t onsultants, Inc, arb�d6 Wparf..9nvepn. emar Parmmirr,¢. 10231 Matra rarkwuy, Suite 202 Ft Myers, Florida 13912 Ph..: 941/418 -0691 Fu: 941!4180672 .Irene 25, 1997 H:\2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc Ladder Back 11/05/2eO9 13:.2e 23941b0e72 80YLAN ETNIR014MINTAL PACE ]i First Assembly of Ministries Page 2 June 26, 1997 Backeround First Assembly of Ministries Currently has an ERF application being reviewed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), #970303 -4, and a Dredge & Fill application by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), 4199605090. These are the primary state and federal regulating agencies that review projects when 'Wetlands" are affected in South Florida. In the rcAm process, these agencies coordinate with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFWFC) and the United State Fish end Wildlife Service (USFWS); these are two Of the state and federal agencies (not inclusive) that have an opportunity to comment on ERP and Dredge & FiU applications. To address concerns raised from the FGFWFC.and USFWS. this comprehensive survey was conducted to determine if the subject parcel contains either active HCO &IFS Borealis, Red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) cavity trees or forage habitat. 'I here is historic evidence of the RCW in the general vicinity SW Florida W odneckers There arc 9 species of woodpeckers commonly seen in Southwest Florida (throughout the year) red-bellied wroodperl including ended woodpecker s, yellow - be fie d cormu m fSekers (Yelow- shafted), Pleated woodpeckers, red - sapsuckers, hairy woodpeckers, downy woodpeckers, and the RCW. Of these, the RCW is listed as threatened by the FGFWFC and Endangered by the USFWS. By color patterns, each o f these woodpeckers can be easily identified from each other (by an educated observer) in the field with a pair of binoculars. An RCW can be identified by the following tree characteristics that arc . unique to the RCW (there are other characteristics / habits Other observers may use): (1) a solid white cheek patch, (2) a black cap and nape, of head and back of neck), and (3) a ladder back (black and white feather bands). As can be seen from the title page, these three characteristics are easily identifiable and are distinguishing from other woodpeckers. H: \2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL doe 11 /O5 /2005 13:.22 2344120672 2OYLnN ENVIRID"ENTAL PAGE 12 First Assembly of Ministries Page 3 June 26, 1997 )ExisllnuSite Conditions The site is bordered on the west by Henderson Canal: and CR:951, Rifle Range Road on the south, and the Florida Sports Park to the east (a +/_ 10 acre undeveloped mebaleucs meet separates the site from the Florida Sports Park.) To the north• there is undeveloped land consisting primarily of slash pine and cypress. A majority Of the subject parcel is in a severely impacted state as a result of. heavy melahmes, Melalmea gninquenervia infestation, a recent tae (including fre plow lines running through the Property on the western 112 of the site), and refuse that has been dumped on the site through the years. A power transmission line run% through the center of the tract. A majority of the melaleaca bas suffered from fiost damage last winter and is in the process of re sprouting. Approximately 45.1 acres are infested with melaleuca and are mapped as a melaleuca monoculture. The north west 4.1 acre Pme- cypress wetland and 0.5 acre melalmea invaded pine Ratwoods are the only portions of the site which have not been significantly. disturbed. This 4,6 acre tract has the greatest potential for either RCW cavity trees or forage habitat. See attached FLUCCS MAP — WETLAND ID MAP (USACOE Jurisdictional Line shown). Survev Methods To determine if the subject parcel contains active cavity races, live slash pines were visually checked for cavity's with sap around the emrauce. _. To determine if the subject parcel contains suitable forage habitat, early morning surveys were conducted, as recommended by K Dryden ofFGFWFC, to document an RCW on site or within the field of view of adjacent property. It was discussed that due to the extreme beat in the late afternoon and early evening, bird activity would be much greater in the morning and this was were the emphasis of the surveywork should be placed. The survey methodology was conducted using a transeet line method developed by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Sevin momtng surveys using I0 X 42 binoculars were conducted on June i R, 19, 20, 22 (Sunday), 24, 25, and 26. The surveys started at approximately 6:50 AM and continued until approximately 9;00 AM when bare, activity generally dropped off. One day the survey continued until 10:00 because of bird activity. The ttauseers were performed on each day approximately as shown on the attached "RCW Survey" graphic. On the west side of The site two transects were walked, on the cast side of the site one large trailed was walked. Attention was also focused on the northern and eastern property boundaries, assuming, birds foraging oft the site would most likely enter and leave the site in this vicinity. On the transects attention was directed on bird vocalization, observations with binoculars and aggregate foraging groups. s type Occasionally, the transects were left to follow individual birds or groups for verification of species type. The survey work and report preparation were completed by Jun Kellner and Rae /inn l3oylan of 13oy1111 Environmental Consultants, Inc. H:\2005 \2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11765%2805 13:20 2394180672 Results 6QYLAN ENVIROh#, 'ITAL PAGE 13 First Assembly ofMinisuies Page 4 June 26, 1997 There were no RCW's or nest cavity trees observed on site or on adjacent property that Islls with field of view on subject parcel. There was a sighting of a little blue heron, .Egretta caeulea, a FGFWFC listed species. The following bird species were identi5ed during the survey. Common Name Corninon Night hawk Common Flicker Northern Cardinal Mockingbird American Crow Pileated Woodpecker Red - bellied Woodpecker Moe Jay Downy Woodpecker Mourning Dove Great Crested Flycatcher Little Blue Haron Rufous -sided Towhee Scientific Name Chordeiles minor Colaptm ourana Cardinalis cardinalis Mimus polyglottos Canna brachyrhynchos Atyocopw pileatus C'eMUrus carolinur Cyunocitta cristato piroides pubescens Zmaida macroura Myiarchus crimyus Egretta camlea Pipito - Whrophtholow H: \2005\2005054\WP\GMP Amendment \2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/95/2005 13:28 2394189672 BQrLAN ENVIRC"4NTAL PAGE 14 First Assembly of Ministics Page 5 June 26, 1997 Discussion Most bird activity was located in the melaleuca invaded pine. flatwoods (FLUCCS 411,1424) located in the northwest portion of the site, next to the pine- cypress wedand. This area also provided good field of view, approximately 200'. As stated above there were no active tree cavities observed in live slash pine, There were however cavities found in dead tree snags; trees that have since lost all bark and only the very largest branches remain. Several (two) red - bellied woodpeckerwere observed in two cavities. Downy woodpeckers were also observed on site. In each case these birds were figowed until positively identified by the large white marking on the back, rather than the ladder pattern characteristic of the RCW. The absence of evidence of the RCW on site is not surprising. The site is extremely impacted with a heavy infestation of melaleuca. The past wildfires had eliminated almost all of the five pine trees on site except for the area in the northwest pan Of the site. The dense undergrowth of melaleuca has eliminated all ground cover and shrub canopy, leaving most of the site devoid of suitable forage habitat. With the degraded quality of the habitat on site, it is anticipated the site is not used by the RCW acid most likely will not be cued in the future. Development of this tract should not have an adverse affect on this species. H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13 -28 2394180572 eOVLAN ENV1R94ENTAL PAGE. 15 LOCATION MAP Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FL Latitude 26°07'10" N, Longitude 81 °41'04" W FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS 199605090(IP -SB) MAY 5, 1997 FIRST ASSEM. OF GOD u STIBET 1 OF 10 tltlp HA2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc _.., 11105/2005 13:28 2394100672 ppgLAN EANIR11,WNUL PAGE. 16 HA2005\2005054\WMGMP AmendmenQ AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc C; W M u m >' qr V p r 0) N .r Fr 7 OLn p W 1*1 P. -4c �. y tJl � UV Fv 5 G, u1 ,._ 11!05/2905 13:28 2394180692 BnvLAN ENVIrMWNTAL. PAGE 17 Pint Assembiv of Ministries Wildfire Discussion Eaisting Site Conditions The site is bordered on the west by Henderson Canal and CR 951, Rifle Mange Road on the south, and the Florida Sports Park to the east (a +/- 10 acre undeveloped melaleuca tract separates the site from the Florida Sports Park). To the nortb, there is undeveloped land consisting primarily of slash pine and cypress. A majority of the subject parcel is in a severely impacted state as a result of, heavy meWeuca, ifela1"ca gvi»yuenervia infestation, a recent fire (including fire plow lines running through the property on the western 1 /2 of the site), and refuse that has been dtunped on the site through the years. A power transmission line tuns through the center of the tract. A majority of the melaleuca has suffered from frost damage last winter and is in the process of re sprouting. Approximately 45.1 acres are infested with melaleuca and are mapped as a melaleuca monoculture_ The north west 4.1 acre pine- cypress wetland and 0.5 acre melaleuca invaded pine flatwoods are the only portions of the site which have not been significantly disturbed. The site has been surveyed several times over the past several years to determine the presence or absence of listed species on site. The surveys were conducted in 1996 and most recently in June 1997. These surveys consisted of numerous pedestrian transects throughout the site along with transeas situated specifically to detect the presence of the red - cockaded woodpecker. Due to the extent of "dog hair' melaleuca it is unlikely that bears or panthers are utilizing anything other than the northwest portion of the site for forage which is proposed for preserve. There were no shredded cabbage palms (bears only), scat, or tracks observed on site indicating their presence At the most, they may, be using it as a north -south corridor as it appeared a white - tailed deer was that was observed denting the June 1997 survey. The white - tailed deer was observed walking down the trail from the north to south on the west side of the property. After First Assembly of Ministries development, a corridor Will still exist consisting of the FPL easement. There was (is) an extreme amount of human activity taking place on and around the site. On any given day (June 1997 Survey) there was evidence of humans using the site for a place to stay at night or for " recreational' purposes. On one morning, there was a dead slash pine smoldering from the night before3n the FPL easement. It was a mid night, relatively speaking, and it appears this fire was meant for warmth. On another morning, June 22, there was an abandoned car located in the FPL easement that was not there on June 20. It appeared from the lire rats someone went joy riding until the car conked out. On three of the mornings, gun shots could be heard from the shooting range located at the H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13128 2394100672 BDYLAN ENVIROFWNTAL PACE 16 Florida Sports Park. On four of the mornings, gravel: trucks were using the FPL fill road as access to the quarry to the north. The greatest human disturbance came from the Florida Sports Park itself. On Sunday morning the public address system started broadcasting Cat Country 101.9 that was clearly legible on the northeastern transect, At 8 :15 am, the "two -cycle junior races (class of races)' started, The squeal of the tires and roar of the engines was easily identifiable. In summary, there were no black bears or panthers (or signs of these species) observed on site. Relative to the entire site, the only possible portion of the site which could be considered appropriate habitat is located in northwest portion of the site and is proposed for preserve. After the First Assembly of Ministries developmerit, a corridor through the site will still exist consisting of the FPL easement. The remainder of the site will be fenced. This fencirig should deter interaction of the animal population with the human population- By preserving the best habitat on site, allowing a corridor through the site and lhoiting any interaction between the animal and human population, the. project minimized the potential impacts to the panther and bear_ H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05{2005 13:28 2394180672 N h United States Department of the Interior .�, . FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Sonth Florida ECo$Ystcal Office P.O. Box 2676 Vero Beech, Florida 32961-2676 April 8, 1997 BOYLAN ENVIBONMEMAL. PAGE 19 Jim Kellner Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. 10231 Metro Parkway, Suite 202 Fort Myers, FL 33912 Applicati on N o. 199605090 FWS Log No.: 4 -1-97 -1-454 Dated: February 28, 1997 .Applicant. First Assembly of God County: Collier Dear Mt. Feltner: Thank you for your letter of February 28, 1997, requesting information on federally listed species and critical habitat potentially present on a 673 -acre site located in section 14, Township SOS, Range 26E, Collier County, Florida. We understand that you are applying on behalf of the applicant for a permit from the U.S. Army Corps ofEtigineers to fill approximately 3L5 acres of wetlands, We have assigned U.S. Fish and Wildtite Service (FWS) Log No. 4- 1 -97 -I -454 to this consultation. The FWS has reviewed the information in your letter as well as information available to us on the presence of federally threatened or endangered species at the project site. our records indicate historic evidence of federally endangered red - cockaded woodpeckers Wicriides borealis) approximately 1,184 meters }rest- southwest and 1,661 meters south- southwest of the project site. In addition, we have evidence of the federally endangered Florida panther (Felix concolor coryi) approximately 804 meters northwest. However, these determinations have not been confirmed by a site visit, We have provided for your consideration a list. of species that are protected w either threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1913. as amended ()6 U.S.C. 1531 or seq), as well as candidates for listing which may be present on or near the project site. Since this list does not include State -listed species, the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comnussion should be contacted to identify the species potentially present in the vicinity In addition, wears providing you with a list of species that we would consider during our review of any proposal associated with this project. This list represents species that the FWS is required H: \2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc .. :1/05/2005 13:28 2394180672 WL LAN Eiidrk' 44ENTAL PAGE 20 to protect and conserve under other authorities, such as Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 at seq.) and the' Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U. S.C. 701 et .req.).. We are providing this list as technical assistance only. I hope this information helps you with your project planning. If you have any questions about this information or if you want additional information, please contact Spencer Simon of this office at (561) 562 -3909. Sincerely, Thomas E. Grahl Acting Field Supervisor South Florida Ecosystem Office Enclosures cc* Skip Bergmann, COE Ft. Myers, FL Kim Dryden, GFC, Punta Gorda, FL K\2005\2005054\WP\GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc ,,. 11/05/2005 13:28 2394180572 BOYLAN ENVIROWN'FA PAGE 21 PEDERAIJ.Y LISPED Tl FZEAIEN.DAND END,9NOFRED SPECIES Aphelucomn enewtercens cuenrlmcens Florida scrub J(m AND CANDIDATE SPECIES FOR FEDERAL US :rlNC, C¢mpephi /um pmmlpatta Dory• -toiled w xlpcc %cr IN COT I.TFP COUNTY (pmhably astinct m wuth Florida) 3cicmilic Neme Co� Nsmc St »tu. Fipinaplrn,cr AmphibU and Rap[ilea Holiaeelus JeucoCepha/us Bald eagle Alligator mio f.,,ippiem U Anim' m mlligmtor T (SAX) Ccrattncanha Lopgmbh,A. tmtic T Chdoaiu mydaa croen sea turac E {7 »enttytus ncutus Amnicmt Crocodile E i)CnAlafJtC(VL I,OIIaCLa Lcflt1mbaCk.I tl. L Drymorchcn corgis conperi F_aaert indigo make T Lrermochele.. lmbricatu liawksbiB sea Ladle E I,epidochetvs kempii Kemlis(— Atl.htio)sidlev<ca turtle G Bird. Ammodrami (J(= Am)rtaaplZ(1)MRr!((mbt mi,bjlu (:PnC.9ahIC 34'4 %dC .p11611A' E+ Aphelucomn enewtercens cuenrlmcens Florida scrub J(m T C¢mpephi /um pmmlpatta Dory• -toiled w xlpcc %cr H (pmhably astinct m wuth Florida) Chorodm,e metodue Fipinaplrn,cr T Holiaeelus JeucoCepha/us Bald eagle T MrrterSn nmdricnnn Wood Ptrnk E Picoidea 6crevlin Acd- cock»d4d wrxJdpecker R. Po!)•banra p /orcns rn.dnbanl: A,»iuixm's. oswd cmr ... T Rasrrlramus aocevbilis ptumhma F- ,,glad, licit kite E ticmiiwxu bochm•mh Bauhmmn w.rbiar L+ -- R1alnmais Fd'a carmolor Mouawn lion T (3 /A) Felix Concotor coryi Flrnida panther F. Tiich,c;o,, anams kw,veMs Wed iudian amain B+ U,:a«amaN ^_an asftoridarors Flondm U.k tu^ C. Plantb Family Apiaccae Cryngivm c,mtfothim tnakcrrx,t p., • Critical habitat h:u been designated Tag dux s,xc,,s in `his county_ Collier County revised 1/15/97 HA2005\2005054NWP\GMP AmendmenA2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/95/2085 13:28 2394188672 BDVLAN EFNIRONF£MAL PAGE 22 MIGRATORY BIRDS OCCURRING IN SOUTH FLORIDA ORDEk GAVIIFDRlAPS FAMILY GAVIIJAE CaWa.gcllm., Red- thmatcd Won Govt, tmmEr. Cwrmrvn Loon Gar!' pacifl.:a, Pacific I..00n ORDER PODICTPEINFORMES FAMIl.Y PODICIPEDIDAE Tackyhaprus Aominrcus, Least rmbe PJddymbum podites, Pir:d -billed Clmbe Pedwepe mrrirua, Eomed Cnebc Po•Bgepc n- [gricollir, Emed Grcbc ORDER PROCELLARIAFORMES FAMILYPROCELLARIIDAF1 Calonecfris dfomedeq Cory s Sbrornatcr Puffrnr.s gravt., Greater Sheat.vater Aijlinat grfseaq S,,Iy Sheam iter Puffin." puj iui,s, Mum Sltemweta PufJinw Iher+ninieri, Audubon', Sheam%tu FAMILY HYDRL'33AI'IDAE O<u'nnee ncennicus. Wi!eun's Sbmr -Petrel Occonodromc:orcrn-hn', Leach's Stolm•Pctrcl C'ceonJdrgma castra, Band -rvmpM Sivrm- YCtrel ORDER PE LECANIIFOR1,TS FAMLY PFAE71 TOW FDAE Phaethgn lcptunu, WIlte- tailed Tmpicbfrd PhaeJron arrherear, Rod- billed N picbud FAMILY SIILIDAE Sign ddcryialrc, Masked Boahv $ula leueogaster -Brown Booby S.Io neiJ, Rcd- tooted Boob' S'uL bnsmonu", Nrn)Lern Canna( FAMILY FELECANIDAE Pelec.nus crytbvrhyacbe. American White Fehm, Fel.*c.nus acc(darn.Cs, Bravm Pd ,,in FA)vM -Y P14ALACROCORACIDAE Phalacrocorax corhJ_Great c,, ro nt Pirai'o'ncoraz mo-fms, Da rbk- created Cormorant PAIAMY .AN- IMGIDAE Anlrinkm onhinka, - Atiltmga FAMI y TRFGAI'TDAE Fregara Mrtgniflcent Ftigambird ORDER CICONIMORM3S FAMILY ARDEIDAE Bdovnua icmlgingsvm, Nvaicm Bitirrn Ixol rvchru eziits, Leas[ 8ittcm A+'dea herodw, , few $lue i4r n Coemerurlfat albuv, Great E_erct Egan' (lndn, Smnvv Egret $graft. cartufeq IlVJc Blue Haon Egmna 04016Y, Tric Lord Nero" Egr rf- rufescmrs, Redd h Egret Bubnkua ibtm, CatticFgmt Butb,ide" sirlomi, Green- backed Hrron A5rrfcor2 nycdc.ra., Black - crowned Night H"= lJyJrfaaem vfgl'cou.r, Yeltuw -cro aai Night Heron FAMILY 11MIXIORNITHIDAE Etrdgcfmus album, White Ibi, i?itdacimvm mbar, S,e Ie Ibis Plsgndis falo.n &,", Glossy Ibis Plcgadis chthi, White -faced Ibis .4jafa aj.jo, Roseate Spoonbill FAMILY CICONIIDAE Afyctmn cnicricena, Wand Stork ORDFR PHOHNICOPTFRIFORMES FAMILY PHOENICOPTERIDAE Ph.e,,r. m,4 rtber, Crcaterjllarnirygo ORDER ANSIRiFORMES FAMILY ANATIDAE Dendrnavgna bhblor, Fulvous W".-dslimg -Duck 7ercdrocygn' adtumvlfls, Black- bellied Whistling -Duck rinserolbijrgna. ( §eater WT- ilc$oulai G.xsc Chen rnerufercar..a, Snua• Ooece Bronco herrrfclo, Brant Bran(. c.,i de.fa, Cawed. C*xrsc A &.vponw, Wow] Duck Anus ,. cca. Gran," -wittg e.. Teal .Anna rubripc.•, ri,- t,uictul Biad Dtmk A,t, fi+ivrgdn, Mottled Duck .3nam plaNrlymchaa, A4:dlard -Arms bdhomenri; White- ::heekGl Pfntnll Anus .Luna. Northcm Pinlnil ;A.nm di,corr, Eluc- wingcd'Icat An2r g�annptera, Cinrmmon TeN Arras .-lyy;mto, N,,Ahom Shoveler Ali=.enepem, Cadwall Anaapenelcpe, Ew'esiau Wigean Ares amerlc'n', American Wigwn .Ayrby,, valis;nano, Cancagback Aydhya nmarfcann, Reatuid Aytlrya cof5afs, Ring - necked back Aythta madly, Gma Sceup Aytlrya Jnfa, Lesser Scavp .S'amutmn molliu(mq, Cgnanon Eida ,gomareria sprc1,,hilm, King, Eulat /TLrMnnicns hi..hignicvs, Harlequin Duck Cfnnprdn hycmalix, Oldsquaw lAe(mriim xrgrq Black Swtcr b:clmrina perspfcillava. Svr(' Scoter M<lan:n'fuec., White.wingM Scoter I/uccphala auuguj, Common Gohlocmw raised 1128/97 7 HA2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13:28 2394100672 IIucephalu alb¢ala, Btrfflehead L phrxlyw, cvcu7lams, Flooded.Mergansur Mlryus mzrgans¢r, Cv ou Merganser Aiergu.v senator, Red•br m(M Merganser Ox}vrzr jnmmc¢xsf,, Ruddv Dude On•um dominicu, Masked Duck ORDER FALCONIPOR,MP.S FAMILY CAT9ARTIDAU Corapya., aar N, Black Vulture CwhaHes aura. Turkry Vulb/re F.AMMY ACCIPrrRIDAF Pandian haliac+us. Osprey 5;anoidcs forficalur, Amtrjcap SwslOw- toiled Kitc Fianvs caeru[ cur, Black- shouldered Kite Airesfrhu»:us snciabi(is, Snail Kitc l4tnia mY,ssls.,lppfensiq Mississippi Kite Ha[laeeous I..... uluq Bald Eagle Circus aywreraq Novhrxn Harrier itttiplmr arriarus, 91.. pshimtcd Hawk Accipiler coopenl, Coaperk Hawk Bu!eo iinratrc,, Rcd- sho.ddmvd Fawk HTro pla+yp+eru, Broral- winF¢+l Hawk Bmca cra<hyurn.,, Short-tailral Hawk Bwcor am,nni, Swainnorts Harvk Bu +eo jamm<rr..o-, Red- toiled Hawk - AMJT,Y FALCONID.AE Pa)j'hG!,4 pi ..... C. ,tCd t'Ar,. Faho apnneMr,,, Amcrictm Kestrel FaLr. ro:umbm iur, Merhn Falco pereginus, Pere¢in Fakoa ORDER GRUTORMES FAMILY RALIDAE C.'orurni<cps neveboroc¢nos' YcIIo4V Rail Lacrrallxs Jnmcicenrfs, Black Rail Rol:u, Imegn.' is, Clapper Rail Rnilu,. efegan.. King Rail Rallur liorianlq V%irginfa Rai( Por•ann carohna, Sorg Forp.5yrvta mmnnba, pr-plc Oalimniv Ccrll[nrdn chlorpu,, Cmr.n Moorhen r,.hca mnerrcana, American Coot FAMILY ARAMIDfE An+m s ,gnaronna, I._impkiu F,AMQ,Y GRUIDAE Cons camrdensis- SandhJl Crvae ORDER CHARADRUFORMFS FANULY CHARADRUDAT, Pluvialla sgnafamfa, Black - bellied Pl:rver Ph+rfulis dominfcq Ln:.�, Qolden -Flown Chorodrvu, olercudrhwr, Snowy No" C'.harodrm, wdsonm, Wdscrsi s Fkn cr BUYLAN ENVIROINTAL PAGE 23 MiX wy brYds Choradnur semlpulmnhrs, SemipalmaW Piovcr Chavadrirumetadus, Piping Plwv Charudripr vocif.A, Killdeer Charadtfus moMOmrs, Mo,mtain 71"rc FAMILY 1jAEMATOPODIDAI? Haemnlopu., pa8lnnu. Amrxlean OyAcreStchcr FA11LY RE.,CURVIRO6lRLnHL Wa,.mopu., nreai "cunrrq Piack- necked Stilt Recurwra,na a.erlcona, American Avecot FAMILY SCOLOPACaDAE TrMga m¢lnnofeoco, Crrenter Ycllmeleas Tringaj7avfpes, Lesser Yallewlega 7Nnka solitorin, Solitary Sandpiper Cotopfmphorus . +rmfpafmatas, Willer .4c.Invs maculana, Spnncd Sandpiper ROH.dar fongfcnuda, Upland Sandpipu ?✓umenius pharnpug Mhimbrej .Num<vilu, amencan.s, Lone - billed Curkew Lf ams limosa, Black-Wltd CW nt Lfrrrosa haemas(ica, Hudsonian GoJu4t Li.•nora fedoq Marbled C-Qdcvit Arenorto fnrerpn:.; Ruddy Tumstnnu nphnza vwgam, 5tuiba d Cnhdris canutus, Rcd Knot C'afidru olba, Sandariing L'ah+bis pusrfla, Scmipatrnond Sandpiper CalidH.<maurf, WeO1 Sandpiper Cafidrls mmwfllo, Lean Sandpiper C.hd,u Lascicnlhs, White -raped SandPipn Caha4is bafrdii, Aainl's Saidpiper Candris meta,. rms. Pectoral Sandpiper Cnlidns acuminate, Sharp- ttai!ed Sandpiper CCofidr is marilima, P•xplc Sandpiper Cab'dn +a ping Dunlin Cnlidris fnnlgineq Czvlcw Sandpiper Colidn:, Aimontpus, Stilt Rnndpjper Dyngiru nubn ?I7co1G.., Buff- breaelcd Sandpiper Phflomru"huspu}ntcz, Puff bannodrcirr+us gnreus, Short -b ➢Led Doa'itaba Gmxoa'rnmus rcofapaceur, Leng'D11crl Dowitchm' Gal7mago ga[linaga, Conan. Snipe .Scn /npar mG,cr, Anerican Wmdcn,:k Phataropwr t, wnlor, W,I.,.'s Phalarope Pnafarop+ +s hrbw s, Rcd- neckcd Phalatvpc Fhatompu., fuhrn»n, fled Phalarope FAMILY LARIDA12 Stmromnus pammsnur, Pmnarinc.laeeer Stercorariru pnraslncux, YarasiGc Jsegu' Slemomrn+s longicavdc,, Long-tailed Jaeger Larus aM'cilla, Laughing Gull [.nnn. pipin:an. Frw,klui s Gall Lnnc, mfwurt, little Gull Laws ndrbunda , Connor Black heeded Bull Luau phfladelphla, Rortnpartc:. Gull rtIwW i!2 &'9' _... 2 HA2005 \2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.clm 11/05/2005 13:28 2344180572 Larus delaavrensrs, Rmg•billcd Gull Lams nrgenrarur, Herring G,dI 1,vn. s,hoyan, Thaye{a Gull L.ms fu,.. Lesser Black - booked Gull L. hyperbore.r, Glaoema CM1 I "', "aria., Cm At Black- backed Oull Itraso tridacrylrr, Black•leggcd Kittiwake Xema s,b,d, Sab mc's Gall ,Srma rifatica, Cull- hilled Tem J':erm cnspia, Caspian Tem Stern, maxima, Royal Tcm S'rerna snndvicemUS. Sandwich Tcm Stern, d,ng,3it, Ro:eatc Tun Srarna hirvndc, r,vmnon Ton Srerno paradi.aea, Arctic Tern Surma jonsteri, Forster t Tcm Sterna arvfRarvm,1 xvq Tern Sterna mn ohcfus, Aridkd Tem .Sternafusnatq Sooty Tern Chlkt,,w, MgeG Black •fern Anarts nolida,, Brawn Noddc Moss mi >urrus, Black Noddy - RyncA,ps nrgegBlack Skumncr F.A2.ILY.4LCMAE A11,.11, Dovckie A4o torda, Razorbill ORDER COLIPavIBiF02V'lE5 AMl1,Y COLLR.IBMAP Colombo sgu,mmo. Seedy -napd Pigeon Cc,!umba leucoccphola, Prltitocrownad Pigcmi Columba hucrma. Bard- taild. Pigeon Zrn dda aciat!ca, WUt,wiggd Do.•c. Zrnnidn aurim, Zenaido Davc Zenalda marr,urq Mourning Dove Co,',, tUw parer Ina, Commrm Gmund.Dmz Gcangan chrysla, Krp• West Quad-D. Geonygnn mIw Ito, Ruddy Quail -Dwe ORDER CUCUL1r0RMES FAMILY CUCJLIDAE Cocnzus erythpthahnua, Black -billed Cuck. Cnccys.• ame>s<anus, Yellow- billod Cuekco C.C",ax minor, MMngrn re Cucknn .C.rorophaga ani, Smooth -biped Mi Cr,roahoga ,eulciroetrix, Groom;- billai Am. ORDER STRIGIFOR.MES FX11r,1,Y TYTONIDAE iya, tb,, Common Bmn -0wi FAMILY $TRJ0n),4F. P,ur asio, Ea,t= Scrocch -Owl Rub. v;,gmion.,, Grant Homed owl Arhene eunavlana, Burrowing Owl Smx vo,m, Bard Owl OCNLAN ENVIRONMFNTA PAGE 24 ,1,flgrala,i' birds A•ei, mug Long -naved Owl Asia f ,m.....,.. Short -tu'ed Owl Aegobw aeadecua, Nortbcrtt Saw whet Owl ORT)PR CAPRTMULGIFORMES FAMILY CAPRIMULGIDAL Chordedcs ncudptnnta, Lesser Nghthawk Chordeika mirnr; Commmi Nighthawk Chord iks gundtoachii, Aatilicwt Nighhawk CigrHmulgus camhneivis, Chuck - wilt's -widow Capnrmrlgus voctferua, Wbip, poor -will ORD13R APODIFORMES FAMILY APODIDAB Ch,aturapelagica, Chimney Swift raAamis phoanicabto, AntlllC;tu Palm Swill. FAMILY TROCIUMAE Amazilm yuc.1,nemo. 130- bcilid Hummingbird Caltiphlox evehmae. Bahama Woodaar Archilochus coh,bri,, Ruby- throated ITummmgbird Archilochus alevundn, Black- chumed Hummingbird Sclasphnrus rvh,x, Rufous Flummlughnd ORDEER CORACIIFORMLS FAMILY ALCFDNIDAE Ce:y1r alrvan, Bolted King5sbcr ORDER PICIFORM ES FAMILY PICDAE Melonerl>ex cryrlrrocephalur, Rd - headed Worndpwkcr Melanerpes corobans, Rd- bc0icd Wandpeckcr S};liyaapicus mriuq Yelow- bellied Sapsvcktt Picoidc.a pubsxcens, Downy woxlpceker Picardzr viRusoo. Barry woodpecker Picoldss borealis, Red- vwkaded w•oodpmkcr Colopw. arvalu.p Navhcm Flicker Dno puspilEnm,S, Pileated Wondpeckm Compephilvs prmetpahq Ivory- I:illd Woadpwker ORDER PASSF.RMORMES FAMILY TYRANMDAE Camopa. Wreaps, OGve-aidd tly-catchar C "w,pus nna, Concur Wood -P cwce b'mpidcnraflnvivenrri.q Ydlow- bellied Fl_vcatcha P_mptd<maz virescrnaq .Acadian Flycetdber Empidon Xe ahrorum, Alder Flycatcher Gnpidonex& 11ii, Willowrlvcatdter Empidonnx minimvs, Lcaat. Flycatcher .Sayom,a nigrirnns, Black Phoebe &T.,u phoebe, Eastern Phnehc Scrymncs soya, say*' Phoctw pyrocephnlus r Una,,, vet mdRN; Flycatcher Mybrehua line rar..n,, A - i}coatd Flycatcher Myl,,hur v,mf. , Cheat Cr,aled Fhrcntcher Myiarehus yramru(vs, Bmwa <Ml-ted Flycatcher 7)r.. u , vncefcrar,.r, Cassin's Kingbul T,Flsw ,128(9] 3 H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13:2a 23s4160572 Tyrannvs ve>t!cnhs, Westem Kmgbird Tyranmrs tvrdnns, Fs,W, Kingbird Tyronmrs dominicen<iz, Gray Kingbird Tyranma caudf scrahrs, Loggerhead Kingbird T}•mnnxsfcrficaMS, SCissrx- tailed Flye fehu Tyr'nnrus ervnna, Fork - tailed, Fiv'emt lw FAMILY ALALJDIDAE £remopM1aln olpc :tr]s, Homod Lark FAMILY HLRUNDINIDAE Prognc suLis, Furyic Mp:iin 2`acOycrrera Grco!or, Tree Swatlow S"achyrmaa g,a ecviridia. Aahama Sw-alow .Aelgldopteryx se,npertn:s, Nrntham Rcngh- winged Sw•ullow Rfpona rlp.ric, Sink Se-ailma' Hrnmda pyn'Ironora, C1iR Swallow ff!randa fidva, Cave Swallow /fi,unco ra.rticn, ettrt 5wall. FAMILY CORVLJJAE Cyanocina crow. ,Blue Ja} .4phelocama enenrlesren., Scrub Jav Curvrcr Lrachlvhvnchcs, Amaicam Crow C,,, <ararfragus, F,sh Crow FAV,JLY PARIDAE Poraa rm'vlinensi.r. Carobna Chickadee P.-nus bicot,' fuled'1•im1ou.e FAMILY SITTIDA£ Slue aarmdesr ne, Red- bress:ed Nuthatch S7tm pusiila, Brown- hemled Nuthatch FAMILY CBR1114IIDAE Cer #ud nmencann, Brown cmq +' YNTAILY TROGLODYTID-AE Thryarhwvs hafovicima+. <, Caroliru +Wren Trng[mivtre sedan, Hoes. Wrm 7roglodyres hogledyre., Winrcr W en Cistarboraa p[ote'l" S.:dgc Wrm C'i.r!o!hn,v.. pahcstris, Mash Wren FAM-Ty T.'RISCICAPLDAE SUBFAJ,ffLY SYLVENAE Rrgu[ar .calrnpa, Golden- wmned Kinglet Regafru cr/rndal , Rubytrowne<f Kinglet Peliophfn cacndca, glee gray Gnaie,wher SUBFAMILY 1URDWA6 Oenanthe oennmhr, Nnrthcrn W'hcatcnr Cintrs .riahr, Ea_nem Bbr bpd Carimrus faacescens, Veery Crtharvs minaaw. (11,q-cb: kcd Thnrh CoJranu psrxloras, Swainsen's Tluu>h Carhams grmarus, Hermit Thrush liylacichJo mxAclina, Waid Tlrub Tvrdus ndgratonus, :Uocricen Robitt herons mrcvivs, Varies Thrush 2DYLLIM ETMIf.'d•M AL PAGE 25 ,tArgra!ory birds FAMILY MIMIDAS Nr etelfa cam[inemais, Gray Catbird Nimrra pv)yglattas, NWkm MoCkinghird Te=,rl ma rvfuw,Brntth Thrasher FAMLY MOTACILLIDAB Amhtu .sp,eguerr, Sprague's Pipk FANUY BOMBYCP LIDAE Bombyeillp cedmr m. Cedar Wu irtg FAMILY LANIIDAE Lamps 7udnvicianus, Lnggerbc d Shrike FAMILY VIRF_ONIDAE Nreo griaeKS, Wtute- e ;'ert Viren Vreo brltd, Bells' Virw Vlrea spTlViriur, 5alitkty Viret, Vimoffaalfrmu, YeLow- tbroawd Veto Vi,,, gihv ,,, warbling Vireo Vfrea phrfudrlphlewr, Philadelphia Virm Oren afivna¢¢s, Red - Ted Vireo V ". airitol., Black -wtlr kern Vireo FAMILY AMBERLZIDAB SUBFAMILY PARULINAE :'ermrvrro 6achmanh, Bachm:ur's Wanc, Vennivampinw, Aluc- winged Warbler Iernrrvuro,h,ysaprcra, Oo',I n- inged Warbler Vcnnrvoro peregrine, Tenneacee Warbler V,m fv ,n aela!a, Osage- rowrm Warbler vo, mh oia rufaopitta, Nasinillc Warbler pmvla amcrreana, N,.Ihem Pawl, Dendrefcapetrchw, Y-How Warbler Dandmlcapemtylman!ea, Cho " -sided Warbler Dendroiw magnhl +a, Magrwlia War'hlcr Dendrofca fig bwo Cale May Warbler Dendrerea cocndeaeenq Aleck - (bloated Bhm Warbler Dendmica unn>,rata, Yellow =. Warbler Demdro!ea nrgrrscens, Black- tbinated Gay Warbler Dendrorca mw,mendi, Trnanaend's Warblu Dcndrorco v mm, ➢lack- thraatcd Omen Warbler Dendrei afusm, Blsekbumian Warbler Dendroiea dominica, Yellow- Itroated W rbler Ocudroica pinu,<, pine Werbtvr Dendrolca ldrrtrsnd+r, Kirtland's Warl+ler D,dn,ica diaolcr, Pndrie W "b:er Dendmrca pahnaram, Palm Warbler Dendroica <a rnnro. Rag- brcated V.'arblu Dendrerar.ra wo, Alackfwll Warble flcndn+im crrutea, Certdcatr Warbler MnraNta varies, Black -and -White WwbI<r Setop }.ago nn:cifla, ?vnakau Rcdcfar( Pro!onnraria citron, Pr ahommry Warbler Ilclmlihrroa rmnlvarua, Worm - calla, Warble, IImnalh(ypts .nvahuomi, Swpinaou'x Warbler Sefurus mrrocapifiars, Cho bird ,Srinrvs nove6arncemis, Northem Wetenhn,, h 8r.'urur motnrila, Louieiam Wtznhn ;.sh reused 128N7 _ -- 4 HA2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINALAd 11)0572005 13:28 2394190672 ffi.lN -AN EWIPft44E At- PAGE '26 .'�RTP +RrI"ltfPds O /,n.prni.r Jormasus_ Krntecky WxWl QoWoll., yviscvlh, Conttam Grackle Cipnrornis agihs. Conna'tmut WsuV, Adolorhrrcr bonarimtir, Shiny Cuwbud Opora)mis philadelphio, Momnmg Warbler Molorhrvr aenevs, Rraml d Cowbird Georhlypit aIlhas, Common Yellowthroat Mntathm3 ater, Bri? - headed Cowbird TRLeania cinina, Hrwded Warblor Ideras spur {vs, Oreilud OTioln fYrhomo pustlld, Wilson's Warbler Iclarus galbula, North m Onole !b)hanir. oanade)utq Cimda Wabler Ff laterlo Wl .. Yellow brer led Cbal BF& ILY CA,L TR SUBFAMILY CARDUEC.INAS SUBFAMILY THFLIUPWAE Camodacris pv purees, Raple Fn iih Spindatis aana, Stripe - Beaded Tanagtt Cardi+e}is yin,m, pine Silo. PIPa)rga ,b,, Svn , Tanagar C-Pdveli, r j,U, A.Ri.. Gol fm,.b Pit @rgd ntrvaeea, Scaric:'1'anagar Ptranga ludr»iciano, W<aYem T.,,ger SUBFAMILY CARDINALNAE Carrilnalu cardtnaLr, Northem Cardinui Fhevasitua lvdoNCfvmn. Rose- brecstcd GmAvak PheucIw,. mahsnocephalw. R;xck- headed Cr[o3bcnk Ouirnru caczviev, Blue Grnduak Yaxxenrta nmocna. Lazuli Buadng Passedna eyancn, ludiga Binding Pnsrrnna ewix, painted Stinting Spill rsmericmv, Dickciscel SUBIAMILY EMBEMUNAE !',Pilo erylhrnphd+otmus, Rrtionssuled Tossd" Plans bicalor, ylack -fatal Grassyoit Aimaphtia.,,14.1m. Ba,,Wnon'a Sparrow' .Sptzelta passerina. Chipping Sp"',v Spizella pollr'di , Clay- wlo,ed Sparc SY.l:rlia pvsilln. Field Sp¢rrow poocccles yranrrnevs, V'-Vs Sparow Chondestes grammaens. Lwk Spocory C¢ /ama.vpize mefanoeOrys, Lark Bn mng paaeerevlv.t .tardwichrn•ir. Snv¢nnA1 Sporrow Ammadramvs savnnnarvm, Grasshopper Spaaow Amrnodramvs hcnsinwii, Hendon,s Spa w .9mmadramns leeonnr:. Le Conies Spormv A.mmodramws cavducu+vs, Mir-tailed Spnrrnu- .imnmdramvs mnsirlmrs; Scnside Sparrow Melospiza melodic, Srmg Spartmv Melnrpiza $ncoln(i Llnmin's Spann -x Afelospiza georginna, Swamp Sparrw.e Zonusrichia albicollis, Mjtc- 9troomd Spill ow 7nnatNChia levcophsyrs. \'Jhite- etnwrted 5pwtnry Zannrviafrfa gnendn, Hrunv Sparrow Jvncn /yemolAq Dark e ed Junco Caloary,rs lapponicus, L¢pland Longspur SITBFAMR -Y ICTER WAE Dopchl," orvzivorus, Bebulink Agelaivs p!raen4 ;ens. Red - winged BlnckbhJ Slnrnella magna, Ea in' M1lradow'Iark Slvrnc ➢a ilglecla, W ,,tern Mcadowimk X'anehacaphalus— Whlcephahrs, Ye11ol,4wodM NL kbh'd Fvphogru narotinus, Rnsty Blackbird S,upieagw cynnaeephalus, Brewds Blackbird QW. •talus m jor, Boat - tailed Crackle 5 H: \2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13:7.8 23941BA672 WAAN ENVIRO[*ENTAL PAGE 27 DEPARTMENT OFTHE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT COWS OF ENGINEERS FORT MYERS REGULATORY OFFICE (0 2301 MCGREGOR aOULEVARD, SUITE 3W FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901 Regulatory Division SEP ; 7 +938 West Permits Branch Fort Myers Regulatory Office 199605090(IP -CC)) MODIFICATION 1 M:s. P,ne Ann Boylan Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Dear Ms, Boylan: Reference is made to your letter dated September 1, 1998, in which you asked to revise special condition 2 of the Department of the Army (DA) Permit 199605090(IP -CC) issued to the First Assembly of God. The project is located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 Fast, Collier County, Florida. ._. You have requested a modification to modify special condition 2 of the referenced Permit. Specifically, you have requested to change the requirement of the nursery grown trees from 6 -foot cypress and slash pine too -foot cypress and slash pine. The impacts of the proposed work on navigation and the environment have been evaluated and found to be insignificant. The permit is hereby modified in accordance with your request. You should attach this letter and the enclosed letter to the permit, All other conditions of the original permit remain in fuC effect, including the reports on the mitigation progress as stated in the Special Conditions section of the original permit. Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program. BY AUT HORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: R. Miller olanel, tJ. S. Anny District Engineer Enclosures H: \2005 \2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc 11/05/2005 13:29 23941ROE79 Boylane Envirown at__ Consultants, c. nmox,. r. September 1, 1998 12; US Army Corps of Engineers Fort Myers Regulatory Office 2301 McGregor Boulevard, Suite 300 Ft. Myers, Florida 33901 RE: First Assembly of God 199605090(IF -SB) Dear NIT. Bergmann: FOYLAN LMMONMENTAL PAG£ 29 RtECEIVED SF_P 0 2 1938 U ^ACE - 8E(3UL1TORY FT, MYCHS. FL The following is a request to modify special condition 2 of the - referenced permit, paragraph four of this condition indicates that the trees would be nursery grown 6 -1oot cypress and slash pine. It is requested that this condition be revised to reflect a minimum 4 -foot cypress and slash pine. The larger trees tend to go into shock when transplanted which stunts the growth. The smancit trees tend to be more readily transplanted, do not go into as severe a shock and over time catch up in height with any taller trees which are planted. This modification would meet the goals of the re, vegetation program, help insure the survival of the planted material and mia mize the costs to the perminee. If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call. Your time and attention to this matter are appreciated. Sincerely, Rae Alm Boylan Cc: pastor Mallory I10 )01vteho Parkway; Suite 4. Fort hirers, Flvdda. 33912 Phone:(941) 416 -0671 F &X:(941) 418 -0672 H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\2 AMENDGMP application FINAL.doc Exhibit V.C.3 Historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject Property on a copy of County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. A copy of said map is shown below. No sites are depicted on the subject property. END 281 RNG 27 1ELL1� ®1nCIC+1(5 .nuz or n5rggl(.LL /+gLN..[Orq�K4 Pxo A+ MgGrES F5iOPlG SigUCIUq[ IMpi 10 $UL[) • Mowcs +xcq+EaogcnE yrE Igor ro stun wa�ures nsrogc o5rgtr �I I' TWP 50 TWP 51 BELLE MEADE QUADRANGLE AREAS OF HI^yIORICA .BAR HAEOLOCICAL .pR4HdIItLLTY O Subject 16 17 1� 0` 15 Parcels 14 13 e 18 i 17 . Rattlesnake Hammwk Rd. _ q+ • _�. -- -. 19 20 21 22 r.n. 24 JPI 19 20 29 26 27 26 23 30 2 1 � r w V r 37 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 f 111 S 4 3 2 6 5 GJ 10 n 1 2 7 B � 7 5 14 3 0 1ELL1� ®1nCIC+1(5 .nuz or n5rggl(.LL /+gLN..[Orq�K4 Pxo A+ MgGrES F5iOPlG SigUCIUq[ IMpi 10 $UL[) • Mowcs +xcq+EaogcnE yrE Igor ro stun wa�ures nsrogc o5rgtr �I I' TWP 50 TWP 51 BELLE MEADE QUADRANGLE AREAS OF HI^yIORICA .BAR HAEOLOCICAL .pR4HdIItLLTY O 11/05/7886 13.29 2394180672 80VLM E Exhibit V.C.3 -A PI ORIA4 DEPARIMENr OF smTE Sittrdm T5- Mordmn smawary of sar DW ISTON (1F HISTORICAL RESOURCES N.A. Gny /uildMga .500 5er1h stothwrrtrh S"t .1 Tsikl rsaee, Florida 32399-0d50 -March 23, 1997 CMmctor'a Office Teletopp��ar Nvmtwi7AX) M4)4mlm 15041403.7333 x1r- Jilin x bw In Reply Rercc To: 11 a � S e 4 Tits: 5oolt II. >rdweide Ft- My44s, Florida 39912 Vdito o Sfus Specialist (904)487 -2333 Pruiaet Fillo No. 971173 RE! Cultists! ltesomw Amemmeact Requese USACOE N9Convide Permit Applictl on Assait bly of Cod 7iaet Comes County, Fwda Dear W. Kakn rr. In aer:ordan" with the pnnx:dures contained irk 16 C.F.R , Part 800 ('ate. -Con uf7jistoau: I'roPreti@s "). we have «tiiewod the re&renced project for possible impau in historic properfim Iistsd, or eftble fur lixling, in the. NarirNarl Register OfHlsrrNicYlrrc'ar. Tho sslihmity For this __. Procednre is the National ITIEoric Preservation Act or t966 iNt lic 14w 88665), us amended. A rrvista of the Florida iblasttx Site Fite indicates Ilan no significant. srchaeWngicai or historical sites are Iccorddf fog or kkely to be pro)ad within the oixc area Futtherntoro, because of the Project lutxrirm aud/nr nature It is unlikely that am Sir will be trf7ected. Thendbrn, it is the opinion or this olliot that the Proposed Pruie" will have no effcct an hlrtotia properties listed, or eligible for Iistir.R. in the harlmwl Relgarar of H ,iTh rlc P4ncltc If you bays any ClUvVions ;urmerning our comments, please do not hesitate to ernntact us. Your interest in prutu tinq% Florida's historic prop,",,, �s spPreciatctl. Sincerely. of D source Cpltp rW and State Hfstolic Preservation Offle. .�rcbaaWealrsi Rntatrb FlarGd� J97or�ph,�mc HFaterjc M1arrsval[aa Museum ofFlertd. Fn.e ry MN) 4ay2299 9041487 -21]7 toostAm.t4er H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -34- EXHIBIT V.D.S. If the proposed land use causes an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or the proposed land use is a new land use designation or district (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.), provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.) For the purpose of this analysis, the elimination of 120 TTRV units and 400 care units and addition of 239 multi - family units results in a general population decrease when compared to the existing PUD zoning, as follows: OLD PLAN POPULATION 400 unit care facility 400 @ 1 /unit 120 TTRV lots 600 @ 5 /unit (occupancy /capacity of existing units) 57 multi - family units 144 (a. 2.52 /unit Total 1144 NEW PLAN POPULATION 296 multi - family units 746 @ 2.52 /unit The difference is estimated to represent a decrease in population of 398. This population estimate is used to evaluate the impacts on most public services. One exception is schools (see Exhibit V.E.3). Another exception is transportation facilities. Both facilities represent modest increases in service demands. With respect to traffic impacts, the combination of community social services with housing (expected to be utilized by employees, volunteers and program participants as well as others) lends a degree of self- sufficiency to the campus -type environment, and the recapture rate is recognized in the accompanying TIA. This, coupled with the proposed provision of public transportation facilities, will tend to minimize the impacts on off -site traffic and other public services, while serving the needs of the community at large. No change will be made to environmental impacts such as wetlands and habitats. The original plan was approved with its wetland preserve, and is protected by a conservation easement. In addition, other mitigation measures for habitat and listed species were required in conjunction with the environmental resource permit that was issued. The new plan represents more traditional residential characteristics, and will support improvements to the institutional uses that will be more compatible with surrounding land uses than the existing conditions, and no adverse changes will affect protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water or natural resources. H:\2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld -doc -35- 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V. E. 1 a) Potable Water and Exhibit V. E. 1 b) Sanitary Sewer Based on Land Use, the impacts of the proposed change are as follows: A 400 unit care facility (200 GPD) = 80,000 GPD, 120 TTRV lots (100 GPD) = 12,000 GPD and 57 multi - family units (300 GPD) = 17,100 GPD equals a TOTAL of 109,100 GPD To be replaced with: 296 multi - family units (300 GPD) = 88,800 GPD Based on Land Use, the impacts on water and sewer will be reduced by 20,300 GPD by the proposed Plan Amendment compared with the impacts under the existing approved PUD. Based on estimated Population, a decrease in population of 398 results in a reduced demand for water (at 185 gpcd) of 73,630 GPD. Wastewater System LOSS (at 100 qpcd for South Service Area) would represent a 39,800 GPD reduction. The current AUIR estimates the capacity of the Potable Water System and South Wastewater System will exceed the projected demand through the ten year planning study period, with an available capacity of 76 MGD for water and 34.6 MGD for Sewers by year 2014. H:\2005\2005054MMGMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -36- Exhibit V. E. 10 Arterial & Collector Roads: Name specific road and LOS Existing Levels of Service Collier Blvd. - David Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock LOS C Collier Blvd. - Rattlesnake Hammock to US41 LOS C Rattlesnake Hammock — Polly Ave. to Collier Blvd. LOS E The minimum Standard is D. Rattlesnake Hammock is currently deficient but is programmed for construction remedies in FY 2005. Based on an analysis performed by the Metro Transportation Group (See attached), "The trip generation of the first Assembly PUD will be increased by 60 trips in the AM peak hour and 60 trips in the P.M. peak hour. Two -way daily trips will increase by 1,055.." (see attached Metro report) HA2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid -doc -37- METRO TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. r, 11�30 ttf¢NDUM TO: Robert L. Duane Hole Montes, Inc. FROM: Robert L. Price, E.I. Project Consultant Ted B. Treesh Principal/Regional Manager DATE: November 8, 2005 RE: First Assembly of God 12651 M[GREGOR 80IJUVAR0 SUITE a11.1 EOkl MYERS, fI 11919.9969 IEl EP110NE ]i9$>63090 iPM $39- $101906 i RANSPIENGINEERING i SIGNAL SIGNAL SYSTEMS /DESIGN Metro has completed a comparative traffic analysis for the First Assembly of God site. The subject site is located along the east side of Collier Boulevard at its intersection with The Lords Way approximately one -half mile to the north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County, Florida. A site location map has been attached to the end of this document for reference. Currently, the subject site is an approved PUD that allows for the development of a wide variety of uses. As a part of this submittal, an amendment is being proposed to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to revise the uses currently allowed within the First Assembly of God PUD. Table 1 illustrates the zoning under the existing PUD in addition to the proposed revisions for the First Assembly of God PUD. omER OERCES BArvwER InSx, nuNDIS EN¢PGO, nurvoll H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid. doc -38- ..i"�ii Mr. Robert L. Duane 111 � �� November 8, 2005 First Assembly of God PUD Page 2 Table I First Assembly of God PUD Existing PUD vs. Proposed GMP Revisions .I.andUse PUD. Proposed Revisions r Residential ing units 296 dwelling units Condominium/Townhouse Congregate Care Facility__ units 400 units Assisted Living Facilit beds eliminated Campground/Recreational p sites 730,000squmfeet 23 camp sites Vehicle Park (to bedi.i edwithin3years) Private School K -12 udents 300 students Church quare feet 30,000 square feet uaRChurch quare feet 20,000 square feet Cb uM 60auea Da Care Center 450 students 450 students Some of the uses listed within Table I already exist on the subject site. For example. there are currently 23 camp sites that exist on the subject site. However, as a part of the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Plan for the First Assembly of God PUD, the camp sites will be eliminated within the next three (3) years. Additionally, the Chapel use currently exists on the subject site, and will remain unchanged. In order to compare the traffic that is approved within the existing PUD to the traffic that will be generated as a result of the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Plan impacting the First Assembly of God PUD, trip generation calculations were performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in their report titled Trip Generation, 76 Edition. Trip generation calculations were performed based upon the uses approved within the existing PUD and based upon the uses proposed as a pan of this submittal. Table 2 indicates the trip generation for the existing PUD for the First Assembly of God. Table 3 indicates the trip generation as a result of the revisions proposed as a part of this submittal. Table 4 illustrates the resultant trip difference based on the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Plan rather than the existing zoning on the subject site. It should be noted that a significant portion of the traffic generated in accordance with the ITE guidelines for the First Assembly of God site never leave the subject site. This traffic, referred to as "internal capture" traffic, was accounted for as a part of the analysis performed within this report. The TIS performed for the existing First Assembly of God PUD accounted for an internal capture reduction of 40% to the AM peak hour traffic, 50% to the PM peak hour traffic, and 45% to the daily traffic generated as a result of the development. However, based on discussions held with Collier County Staff, the internal capture rate will likely be reduced as a result of the additional multi - family units proposed as a part of this Growth Management Plan amendment. H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid doe -39- Mr. Robert L. Duane November 8, 2005 First Assembly of God PUD Page 3 Metro held discussions with the staff at the First Assembly Ministries in order to determine revised internal capture reductions based on the proposed Growth Management Plan amendment. The staff at First Assembly Ministries provides group transportation for the Life Academy clients to various services throughout Collier County on a weekly basis, thus limiting the campus trips. A list of the group transportation services provided as a part of the Life Academy can be found in the memo attached at the end of this document. These services are currently provided as a part of the Life Academy, and these services will continue as scheduled currently. Therefore, the internal capture rates for the First Assembly of God site were still utilized as a part of the proposed Growth Management Plan amendment. However, the internal capture rates were only applied to the Life Academy traffic, thus a trip reduction was not applied for the multi - family dwelling units proposed as a part of this amendment. Table 2 First Assembly of Cod PUD Existing PUD Trips H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid.doc -40- - A.M. Peak Hour PAN. Peak Hour Daily Land Use In Out Total to Out Total a•"'aY) Residential Condominium 30 35 25 15 40 400 57 unift Congregute Care Facility 10 25 40 30 70 860 4CO 1mN3 Assisted Living 20 55 40 50 90 _ 615 400 boas Campgroundr2V. Perk 15 25 30 15 45 Private Sclsool (K -12) 90 225 20 30 50 745 300 nudcnt5l Church 10 20 _- 10 10 20 275 30000 ,aAudimium I to 5 15 10 5 15 180 ZO 000 .a I Day Care Center 175 160 335 _ 130 150 290 2,040 450 ms Total Tri under Ezistin PUD ps 395 340 735 305 305 610 5,115 Less Internal ure -160 -175 -295 -150 -155 -305 1 -2,300 New Trips under Existing PUD 235 205 1 440 155 1 150 1 305 2 815 H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid.doc -40- OM Mr. Robert L. Duane November 8, 2005 First Assembly of God PUD Page 4 Table 3 First Assembly of God PUD Proposed Trips based upon GMP Revisions Table 4 First Assembly of God PUD Trio Generation Comparison Land Use A.M. Peak Hoer P.M. Ptak Hour Peak Hour Daily ' Land Use In Out, Total In out Total (2 -way) . Residential Condominium 20 105 125 loo 45 145 1,615 i96 unift 273 500 205 1 !CO 365 3,870 Tri Difference Congregate Care Facility 15 10 25 40 30 70 860 400 unia Campground/R.V. Park 2 3 5 5 5 10 — (23 c eik Private School (K -12) 135 90 225 20 30 50 745 700 alukiu, Church 10 10 20 10 10 20 275 30000 M. A. Audiwnum Church IO 5 IS 10 5 IS 180 20 .a. 11 d q10 Day Care Center 175 160 335 130 150 280 2,040 450nudmtel an Tolal Tri tuWer Revised PUD 367 383 saaaaaas 750 315 275 590 5,715 Less Life Academy Internal C -140 -110 -250 -110 -1IS -225 -1845 New Trips under Revised PUD 227 273 500 205 160 365 3,870 Table 4 First Assembly of God PUD Trio Generation Comparison Land Use A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2-Way) In Out Total Ip Out Total New Tri sunder Gxistiqg PUD 235 205 440 155 0 305 2,815 New Tri s under Revised GMP 227 273 500 205 1 !CO 365 3,870 Tri Difference -8 +68 +60 +50 +10 +60 +1,055 A ncgmive vnlue rep.rnts a rcduttion in nips b d nn the p cd rc m.., to tle GMP, nut a positive vulue «presena s net trip inerewe As can be seen within Table 4, the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment in regards to the First Assembly of God PUD will increase both the AM and PM peak hour traffic generated on the site by 60 trips and the daily traffic is shown to increase by 1,055 trips. Concurrency analysis was performed as a result of the proposed revisions to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table IA, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 3%.3% -5% Significance Test. In order to perform the significant impact analysis, the project traffic was compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour — Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the Collier County Coneutrency H:t200512005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -41 _ FEN Mr. Robert L. Duane November 8, 2005 First Assembly of God PUD Page 5 Spreadsheet as of 9/22/2005. A copy of the Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet is attached in the Appendix of this report for reference. Based on the information contained within Table IA, only Collier Boulevard, Davis Boulevard, and Rattlesnake Hammock Drive will be significantly impacted in accordance with the Collier County 3 %3 %5% Significance Test. Therefore, concurrency fink analysis was performed on these roadway links based on the added traffic as a part of the First Assembly of God PUD. Since the proposed First Assembly of God PUD will likely not be completed until the year 2009, the existing traffic conditions within the latest Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet were grown to 2009 conditions based upon the historical annual growth rates reflected within the 2004 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report. In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table IA also includes a concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network based upon the projected 2009 traffic conditions. The current remaining capacity indicated within Table IA was taken from the aforementioned Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet. The project traffic was then subtracted from the projected 2009 remaining trips in order to determine the remaining capacity after the First Assembly of God traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. Based upon the information contained within Table Lk, sufficient capacity will be available on Collier Boulevard to the north and south of Lords Way adjacent to the subject site in addition to Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard to the west of Collier Boulevard. However, concurrency problems are shown on Davis Boulevard to the west of Collier Boulevard. According to the most recent Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report, funding of the six- laning of Davis Boulevard to the west of Collier Boulevard is anticipated within the year 2009. Should this improvement exist in the year 2009, there would be sufficient capacity on Davis Boulevard after the addition of the First Assembly of God traffic. In order to indicate the Level of Service conditions on a six -lane Davis Boulevard, Table IA was amended. Table ID indicates the Level of Service conditions on the area roadway network after a six -lane Davis Boulevard. The Level of Service standard for the existing six -lane section of Davis Boulevard to the west of Airport Road was assumed as the same Level of Service standard for the future six - lane segment of Davis Boulevard from Collier Boulevard to east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. It should be noted that Davis Boulevard is within the Fast Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The following excerpt indicates the intent of a TCMA within Collier County: Rule 9J -5 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAQ authorizes the establishment of TCMAs as an alternative transportation concurrency approach promoting infill development within selected porilons of urban areas and supporting more efficient mobility alternatives, such as public transit. A TCMA provides an alternative means of analyzing new developmeni for transportation concurrency by enabling the county to establish area -wide Level of Service Standards, for defined geographical zones in H.\2005\2005054 \WMGMP Amendment\3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld -doc -42- Mr. Robert L. Duane November 8, 2005 First Assembly of God PUD Page 6 which alternative traffic routes and alternative modes of travel are available. A development moratorium would not be declared for a particular road segment within a TCMA unless fewer than 85 percent of the parallel lane miles in that TCMA are achieving their adopted Levels of Service (LOS). In other words, when a roadway is within a TCMA, the concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis rather than an individual roadway basis. Bused on discussions with the County Staff, the parallel lane miles within the East Central TCMA are currently within the 85% threshold. The impact of the proposed First Assembly of God development to the entire East Central TCMA will be reviewed upon the submittal of development permits for each individual phase of the development. The concurrency projections performed as a par of this analysis reflect a "worst case" scenario. The remaining uses within the First Assembly of God PUD will not he developed entirely at the same time. When each individual phase comes forward for development permits, concurrency will be reviewed based on the "real -tine" concurrency system in place upon the submittal of the permitting application. Therefore, while a 2009 analysis year was utilized, the final building permit will likely be applied for by the year 2007 or 2008. Concurrency information could be significantly different when the Developer applies for building permits. In conclusion, the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment as a part of the First Assembly of God PUD will remove the currently approved Assisted Living Facility and Campgrourd/RV Park. Additionally, the multi - family dwelling units within the existing PUD will be increased as a part of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment. Based on the analysis performed as a pan of this report, the trip generation of the First Assembly PUD will be increased by 60 trips in the AM and PM peak hours and 1,055 daily trips based on the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Plan. A concurrency projection was performed as a part of this report as well. While Level of Service deficiencies are shown on Davis Boulevard, the First Assembly PUD will be subject to the requirements within the "checkbook concurrency" system at the time of SDP submittal for each individual phase of the First Assembly of God PUD. Should sufficient capacity not exist on the County roadway network, the development will not be allowed to move forward until capacity is restored. If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me. Enclosures H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -43- PROJECT LOCATION MAP Figure 1 FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD H:\2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -44- _mom _\GM P___!__mm application m< _ 070302 rld.doc -45- - | |�,,, . .! • ,, § f | § |!!!! ! !! ! !§ B ° |2 |§§r ■!■ ; „ r �, )/§ ■ | | | §� ■! ! __ . .. �7 E, ■ | |t!!! ! ;; ! „ §§ !| §! ! } | | _mom _\GM P___!__mm application m< _ 070302 rld.doc -45- |! |,,,,, . ,; . •, � | | §■,, , .! : r § |! |!!!! ! !! ! !! � \k! § ■ | || ; ■ ■! ! !; r r: ��& E, ■ | | ; §!! , r; ! !! } \/ !2 ■ § ;! , ■! : ,■ I , F> |! ! ! | | 005\200 _\GM P Amendment\3 AMENIDGMP application m< rev 070302 rldAoc -46- SEP.22.20W 4:4WM FIRST ASSEMBLY N0.407 PA j First Assembly Ministries Fax: 239 - 774 -0538 Phone: 239-774-116S DATE: 9aO-O s To: I& L906 "Wier FAX #: 4fe l ft FROND A)e(laRj Total Pages (including cover page) a FORty15/rax covu4m lWoro) H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rid.doc -47- SEP.22.2005 4:40PM FIRST ASSEKOLY M.407 P.2 NSS, �k:w ✓: =n FP caftQ lft County to Chrnt *%* ft Cheat Conmffisbn &W 0C QM Cansr4nd1 nt w ad peoge, a ar *t^ Mar m Homed: • Praise FM 89.5 Campus of Care - A mhiWq w aw fll m ku, Addicted, Abused and Unwed mothers FIR91'A4SRMa1.Y MINITMINS .jr /Axw7.1lna n. Res, N,W 3805.11. IaMS way NapK M ida 94114 (299) 77411 Fos (499)174x999 Campus of Care Tndlk Report September 277, 2005 Whte in Life Academy, clients are not allowed m have possession ofthefr man whits. On a weekly bass clients are transported to such services mass as: 1. Wa4#Aat— upon legtest 2, PubOx for gmcery run 2x times per week 3. Nelltbhalgod Heath Cknk at Walt t limas per week 4. Doha's appoinlmeMS (l k%*, Cleveland Cans, County Health Departm !) S. Social Services 6. Lout appointments 7. Probation (same dents, mont ty twice per month and some waekth 8. Food stamp office ( there Is usu* a nm on a weekly bass OM each time a client tomes into the program. 1. Assistance wit) dolhkhg 2. Wartal food ass stance, until the clad can be placed on Food CL: "? itcc ,slit Kit .AN H.\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -48- SEP.22.20M 4 :46PM FIRST A SETIBLY MD.407 P.3 PASSES FOR THE WEEK of Septmther I �b'to September 2f' t1 t. 11 YOU HAVE AN APPOINMENT THE TIME ON THE sCHEDULE, Is THE TIME YOU NEED TO BE AT THE OFFICE, THANK YOU Satnrdav Sentember 17, 2005 Lisa ltobse Sunday September 18, 2005 Jay Catu t o Kristin MCC= MMdav September 19.2005 Eula Rash ALL THAT NEED TO GO Tnesdav September 20.2003 Michael Nojunas Glenn Tucker Wedueaalv September 21, 2005 Family Visit 9 -16 830PM until 9 -18 9:30AM Family Visit 1230PM until 6PM Family Visit 10:30AM thin 9 -191PM David Lawrence 1 OAM Transportation by Faye FOOD STAMP OFFICE SAM Dr Labs 9AM Dr Nist 9AM Transportation by Faye Tburxdav September 22, 2005 Miehael Nojunat Dr Labs 830AM ry�fJty a ��,,,,,, I (,oAA Transportatiou by Faye Alexis lie u 'ghborhood Clinic 230PM Lt tar Roi.s----- asportatiopbyFaye Mdav September 23.2001 ;`« H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -49- Z w O �mS ^_ Oq m Vm�p nay 1�qp �y yp m.p�ym mp �p p r1 tV b Q a 0 m p W W W W W O p O W p 0 0 0 0 W W W W � O CI W W O O W WOW W W O p O O W W W W W p p 0 0 0 W m d NmmromY V Nmdd YNY tOmT (Od Nm DMNN10mY fOmm V V NNeD mtDmmNNN dm �O W 2 3 VNC)(�I tNIYN m��NN�NI�Id Y Ne-e -N thM� �Cl�f��'l��(V �Md t�M � Nlf t7 ¢ b E m 3�gkkill, �y�x�'� p y 11ill �a oil PN 39 n6 tdn wtdn C� 3�¢5@ m F->rl «U�� o�rrcpa omo3 ¢_m Wp E2 D y3 @ o id, Bmnin ��$ � ���Ba "r8 a�EA i m �marn B B D D ryQ ppp mTC _q 2��33�i�333 >4. i. Yd `a88 g a'Ncs 3 ° Lt °8. �n83�ug aa� »9S3�u�3 ^_>`m €S ^5� a � E %K d'KK p m da`Na wE ZZ aa'Baa�E a s rc iamdaaaa�4�� Z� ��BBoBB �BB HUM,HUM, �@ �_� .�.��F�ffi.��Ei�SS�E���Ex OmSSc�c �uCq�p�ccai� c ♦3. 8�mpw �'� Nt'! d Yf tp lam° � tAY bfOr W W NNN NN�NNCI I7Mm��l �t`l rn'1MdY Yd V Y Y T Y Y Yf N D! H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -50- py bN�MI� W -Nry ��s�gNsW--A F V N W SIVC1N N� ����W(Op ��" W Nl NtFINN- NNNNNMN OMNdY�l�OO�N(ONt°MIN �Of°N�� W ��t�I�O N�aN Ml��dbOIYbNN W H�Y OW � W W W W° O O O° W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 ❑❑° W W U U V U U V U U U W W W W W W U V U W W W W W W W bfO IONNNNYb Y)bbl°OY d d d d Y Yb1°NNNNYNNNNI° W bb(°(DNNN(°(pb b(pbb ��$�$���jjB8 OrpQp O�O�.II iQ{�� $�� SS33oWom OObbM]M1 ropNNNNVO m�m�tOV $�jj (OVnnn88p(y O y_O yO YOOtl�{O fO �t�trll tF"f�NNN� WrNm��Hmm rW � W rW �mOtn �+IN OCI th�OObNM>f� �tnM C E p m o ^a y $' { !• m° D�� ctt as mOa rc pNa`EE�y pI_5 �pA�8 �- yY N N p3 ws rc y y 7f c°I g Q�P o .yyg .z rc K rc K K 8'y iii e$ g °s o m ac7m$mE»c�v,a_�3b °cg ac�u4ddc�_c>t>z c�mmr�i� °3i- VriibS3 >c�ibu ° a K m y mg$ w HIP nug K n° gT b c� a € i `� g v' °b b d G F iv r� $• ° 4 R m g d m m ml, m E �._� M a3 a��= ��zmig LL3 um�� > "�av� >a mo o� W _¢ ai° a mog4 2EEE o w y € € € € €€ gg HI - .1 112E.11JESM!E O mHff aW ¢ r- rpi �i �i rdfim mOimWVi�F - m- ,MrF -pF�99 rr n$vRN M°i 23281�2m° ;: P� P;t;� n Fz P 2'm 9 2 A 2 2 m N d' 9; 8 9 rn 999 o NO O$ K: 2005\2005054\WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -51 - :K #■ »@; |!G■+!! ■ ;, - ;§_,� »!;,■an§®®$ ® @! q §!! §77[2!■;K& / 27 ,! ! f%J | d.yem },!■ !!!� $||.���! ! "11 111 loci w ( «; |! ■! ■ |! | ;f| J7!/22$|)2f2H / w_5\20«w_me__m,__me application FINAL rev mmzdoe -52- Exhibit V. D. 1 d) Drainage The Water Management Plan for the existing PUD is in place. The modifications to land use are expected to have little effect on the basic system. The total area of impervious surfaces will be similar. The Water Management Plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary for the Revised PUD, and detailed plans for drainage will accompany subsequent Site Plan applications. (see also attached Miscellaneous Exhibit V. C.7 SFWMD Permit conditions) H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -53- Exhibit V. D. 1 d► Drainage The Water Management Plan for the existing PUD is in place. The modifications to land use are expected to have little effect on the basic system. The total area of impervious surfaces will be similar. The Water Management Plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary for the Revised PUD, and detailed plans for drainage will accompany subsequent Site Plan applications. (see also attached Miscellaneous Exhibit V. C.7 SFWMD Permit conditions) H;\2005\2005054\WP\GMP AmendmentV AMENDGMP application FINALdoc Exhibit V. D. 1 e) Solid Waste Based on estimated Population, the proposed plan will cause a decrease in population of 398. The current AUIR uses 1.24 tons per capita for projected years 2005 through 2024. The effect of the plan proposal would therefore represent an annual reduction by 494 tons. The AUIR projects a surplus landfill lined cell capacity through year 2020. H:\2005\2005054 \WP\GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -54- Exhibit V. D. 1 fl Parks: Community and Regional Based on estimated population, a decrease in population of 398 would result in a reduced demand for Parks accordingly. At a level of service of 1.2882 acres of community park land /1000 population, a 398 population decrease would decrease need for community park land by 0.51 acres. At a level of service of 2.9412 acres of regional park land /1000 population, a 398 population decrease would decrease need for regional park land by 1.17 acres. The current AUIR report projects a 10 year surplus in available parks to meet projected population with park acres planned in CIE. (see also Exhibit V.E.2 Community Facilities Map) H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -55- Exhibit V. E, 2 The subjeO property is ;wrenfly Served with water aful sewer sP-1V1L-,P The map below tclenfifi,�s locations of Schools and offiPr services "O'k 16%1 11, C.0 1y:0 I P1. 'im,7 (0, blamewan 1. O—A m, dw,", !1 ,: :yG , ,I I % H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment\3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc - 56 - Exhibit V. E. 3 Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. Based on estimated population, sewer, water, and EMS services are provided by Collier County. Fire protection is provided by Golden Gate Fire District. A decrease in population of 398 would generally result in a reduced demand for these Public Facilities, accordingly. However, one exception may be a small increase in school population. The reason for this is that the reduction in population is largely a result in the elimination of the 120 TTRV /campground units that realistically function as dormitories for those in the treatment center. This may not necessarily result in a decrease in school -aged population due to the nature of the facility. For the purpose of determining the impacts on potential numbers of school -aged children, it is assumed that the increase of 239 (296 minus 57) multi - family dwelling units, representing 206 (239 x 2.52) persons will likely result in the potential for a population increase for schools. (See Exhibit V.E.2 showing schools serving the subject property.) Fire Department services would need to serve 398 less population. However, while population may decrease, there will likely be an increase in the number of structures - on the subject property that may result in a negligible negative impact. ( 239 new multi - family dwellings minus 120 TTRV structures equals 119 potential new structures.) Emergency Medical Services LOS of .000068 units per capita would result in 0.027 fewer units. In the current AUIR, Emergency Medical Services reported a surplus of units through FY 2011 -2012. H:\2005\2005054 \WP \GMP Amendment \3 AMENDGMP application FINAL rev 070302 rld.doc -57- �( r\ }] � §I ■ !� 2 �t &§ K\ . , .�. _. ..a. . � 005\200 m__ m_»P application ems _ 070302 w: -58- . . \ } .I LO vim/ � 005\200 m__ m_»P application ems _ 070302 w: -58- Mimi,, Exhibit V.G.4 FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. Colonial Square 1040 Goodlette Road N. Naples, Florida 34102 -5449 Phone (239)262 -6455 ❑ Fax (239) 262 -0578 ❑ Fax (239) 263 -7945 November 9, 2005 Mr. Robert Duane Hole, Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL P ase Respond To: APLES OFFICE MARCO ISLAND OFFICE P.O. Box 2000 606 Bald Eagle Drive, Suite 501 Marco Island, Florida 34146 -2000 Phone (239) 394 -1199 Fax (239) 394 -8641 Re: MDG Fountain Lakes, LLC S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Dear Mr. Duane: At the request of Mark J. Woodward, Esq., enclosed herewith please find the following: Deeds transferring title to First Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Inc. Deed transferring title from First Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Inc. to MDG Fountain Lakes, LLC. Deed transferring title from First Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Inc. to Vision & Faith, Inc. Should you require anything further, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. �Sincerely, I�td� 103"N2/ Lesley i Enclosures as noted cc: Mark J. Woodward, Esq. Title Insurance • Escrow Closings • Searches y mW *" 2029806 OR: 2155 PG: 1208 !'* U u Lt offfclu 1111007 of C WU chart, n Ilfl 111 at WITU 111011. Ima, Isla ), Cm 1HI 4I.0 THIS INDENTURE, made, d is Y day of f — alto DW-.II 175.14 1994 between II TITU ► Wtutt James A. M17L{oq u "Malec of tee Jamts A. McTWM Revocable Trod tLCI 11 D.W DOMebw A 19" of 4530 Tamiami Trail Noah. Naples, FL 33940, as GRANTOR', To FM Assembly of God of Naples, Flaldn, lx» A FloeiL Corporation, as GRANM*. whose, pmt office address ie: 2132 Sbadowlswo Dave, Naples, FL 31962 WITNFSSETH, do the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS (SIOJD), and Other good and valuable considerations to acid Gnow in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has panted, barpmed and saki to the said Grantee, and Graatx's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and beisg is the County Of Collier, Slate of Florida. to wit: The West I/2 of the Fw, 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, of Section 14, Towmhip 50 South, Range 26 East, less the South 30 (cet thereof reserved for Public Right of Way, showed and lying in Collier County, Florida. Property Appraises a Pant Identification No. 00017880004 & 00418120006 THIS IS VACANT AND UNIMPROVED LAND AND THEREFORE NOT THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF THE GRANTOR, NOR CONTIGUOUS TO THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, AS SUCH HOMESTEAD IS DEFINED UNDER FLORIDA LAW. SUBJECT TO taxes for the year 19% and subsequent years, rcatrinioos, reservations and casements of record, and zoning ordinances of Collier County, Florida. - - -_� And said Gramm does hereby fully warrant pawns whcmaocvcr. i • Singular and plural are inter W WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor his Signed, waled and delivered in )KC presence of O m I1 Witness I2 - As to all pantms STATE OF ��u .• ,I .� clv?l the same against the lawful clitms of ail and year first abuse written. Revocable COUNTY OF Cc //t,P• 1 -1 - l The fmcgoiog instrumcm was acknowledged berme we this _, day of / f,et 1994 by lames A McTaaun Such person(+) (Nmay Public must check applicable boa): is /art personally known to me. produced a /thew current drivels licemse(s). J produced as identification . `l� ( NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) ) IS I 'ylL� `. 1 sky Pumi4 This W-ruarent prepared by. (PruIcd, Typed be MmPed ante FIRST TfrLE & ABSTRACT. INC. Commission Number. 1040 Gmodlette Road North My Commission expires Naples, FL 33940 Telephone: (8U) 262-6455 IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE N vans* hd THIS INDENIZIRE, made this 4th day of WA bavueeti >t:: 2042504 OR: 2168 PG: 1311 *' nmtNe is Nn= tart of IMMI felt, K 0101" at Mills MM 1. MM. CM dM UM." April, IM 111 6.0 NF.11 17F.N Isy W. Rom, Individually and as Trussm of *a Flaetum R. Rae Reusable Tram daNd Math 38, 1971, and Kenarth G. Rae, a married maa, Jobed bF W die Rdv teem, of 125 Went North Avenue, Chicago. IL 60610. m GRANTOR*, To Mat Assembly of God m Wples, Florida, lac., a Florida ewForatloa, as GRANTEE•, whore poll office address is 3132 Sbadowlawa Drive, Naples, Fl. 3.YA2 lots: HIS! 71T4 k IJ"M till N WITNETSEIH, shat the Gramm, for and is coasideration of the stun of TEN DOLLARS (110.00 and other pod and valuable considerations to said Gramm in bead paid by said Grantee, tba receipt wkfcof is hereby aetsowled/ed has granted, bargained and sold to the said Gramem, and Grantee's hear and amigan tamer, the fdlooieg described Iwk situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to grit: Tim West 1/2 of 14 Northwest 1/1 of the Sow4ml 1/4 of the Northwcd 1/4, Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. situated and lying in Collier County, Florida. AND The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of The Southeast 1/e of the Nortbwem 1/4 of Section 14, Towal:p 50 Sam►, Range 26 East, leas the South 30 test thcicof, situated and lying in Cutler County, Florida Property Appra6ces Parcel Identifrcat" No. QQ5168MM /5 as to Parcel 1. and OO419M000lf at to Parcel 2. SUWECT TO taus fa the year 1996 and vubcgam years, ridriaioon, rererwion, and tmemeata of record and Boeing mdiaaaces of Collier County, Florida. And said Gramm does hereby fully warrn persona whomsoever. , , Singular and plural at interchiN IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gramor red Signed, jofx-z-' Winners d2 As to all grwon the same again the lawful claims of al Bm,y STATE OF lylwr_ COUNTY O r The foregoing iaaru to was acknowledged before we tW&Jfyday of m. Wand by his wife Betay Rost . Such ff4� rFt: GA8cW I HE Jdr ,rata Or asutda Y i. .: ♦ i1a (Notary Public mum is /ere personally knowa to me. produced a /Their current drivels liceme(s). F.oduced and year font above writes. and L sa rnee of the p6coce & Rom I 30. 1971. 1996v as idemiGolioe_ This kalrumem prepared by. (Prioled, Type&-- Stampeal7a- Rotary�nhhe FIRST TITLE S ABSTRACT, INC. Commasioo Number: IM Goo"t Road North My Commission esp'ves: N FL 33910 T : (813) 262.6455 W CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE vW04 DW TIES BIDENRIRE, made the I Ithday of AW 1994 between "t 1047516 OR: 2173 PG: 2122 "t no 0 to Menu UM of team town, n 1111 /16 at 10:41M MtiR 1. an. Litt taw 1GIM.M Itt Ins 6.04 Its -.11 1121.0 le nis, tint 1 URIi t Wem M. Me and grace C Men, Tissues In Common. !]C► It lw of 11930 N.W. 39th Street ID. Coal Springs, PL. 33065, as GRANTOR', To Was Assembly of God d Naples, Florida, tae, ■ Olorldn earpaYloa, in GRANTEE•. whose past office addram W 2133 Sbodowiaww Drive. Naples, Fl. 33962 WTTNESSM lhm the Gramm, for ad in consideration of the Nam of TEN DOLLARS (SIOAD) and tuber good and valuable tomidendons, a said Gramm in hand Find by said Grassm the recegl whereat Is hereby a ee4 has pawed. bsgaleed mad sold to the said GMMM and Gnaw*$ India and seigis limner. the fo0owieg Jerald lead, spume, lying and being In the County of Collier. Stye of Florida, to wit The East 1/2 d the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Noahwat 1/4, of SCWM 14, Township 51D Sarah. Raigs 36 East. Lean the Sash 30 feet thta4 skewed and lying in Collier CatcoM Florida. The subject property is vaunt unimproved land and is thadae col the homestead of the Granters. Properly Appraisers Parcel identification Nor 001178100D/2 and 009181600018 SURIM.0 ' TO taxes for the year 1996 and subsequent years, reatrkahuia, reservwiuns and eanemims of rmecd, and acing ordieaerea of Collier County, PlorMs. And said Gaiter does hereby fully warrant persons the, 1, • Sh gal usd pf" are iw a mrcgwro IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Gramm S*04 seaw ad &bwscd in she praeaee oE� i ki �.. _ \ Wtxso 1 As to ON* STATE OF COUNTY 1 defend the souse gehw the lawful claims of ad aid sW thq day aid yea first show written "NW,_ The foregoing Ieslromeet was acknowledged before nee 6WIE> day d Apra, 1994 by Wifu'am M. Mee, �vidady ad ns Attereey in Pact oe belaB d Base C. Mee. Such person(s) (Notary Public cowl died applicable bona F� is /arc personally known to me. I 1 prodomd a /their current drivers license(&). j produced as idemifcaioa c ( NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL ) e ngsa( e S o.ry This instrument prcpacd by. e or Stumped Name ol Nolary POW TITLE d ABSTRACT, INC. Commimioa Numbs: CC Zr93-7'7 1010 Goodletle Rood North My CoaMl&skn cxPira: , 1 -/f -'r N PL 3394D 7 (941) 3626153 IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE .�• 'w ns.c «w►.1,wcafran a7Y.. Gq M flea 1� Y �C WWON &dsl cw m THIS INDENTURE. made this 26 day of April 1996, between Barbara Luny a Muriel Women of IDS Cmscos Rood. Napkx, Florida 3Y)63, as GRANTOR, To "* 209254 OR: 2175 PG: 1615 "t (a all"" mtael ot RYm tlmtt, FL N /If/ f at at:tlll KIM 1. M, an lf1 2111N.M at Ion 6.0 W-.H 1111.11 RU: flIn Iltt I ANIM ties Fbv4 Assembly of God of Naples. FtorW, lar. a Florida Corpanllw, as GRANTEE, whose post office address is: 2132 Sbadowirwo Drive, Naples, FL 33962 WITNFSSIS M that The Gramor, for and in consideration of the soon of TEN DOLLARS (Slow), and other Food and valuable considerations to said Gram" in hand paid by midi Gnmor, do too* wbucof is hereby ad m Medvd, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Gramm and Grmaces heirs and amiym fmanr, the following dcsa4,ed land, silumc, tying and being in the County of Collier, Slue of Ilorida. to wk: The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 m Saone 14, Township SD Smith. Range 26 Eau. less the West 130 fed thereof, said hod situated and lying in Collier County, Florida. Property Appraiw r s Parcel IdcwiBcaflou No. 011111100000/3 SUBJECT TO lases for the year 1995 and sub"vem year; restrictions, reservations and a —e—^+u of record, and zoning ,wdimanax of C olller Coomy, Florida. And said Gram" does hereby fully warrant the title to Laid fend, and Will defend the same against the Iaivfd claims of aR Persons whomsoever. _ 1 1-,— SUBJECT PROPERTY IS VACANT GRANTEE NAMED HEREIN of Collier County. Fkwkh, which GRANTEE NAMED HEREIN balance of $2.717.00. Singular and plural are IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor Signed, sealed and delivered I in the prew.nce of: o lYancss •1 t(.Ia.l(l�ti�tltl /{-� (Print Namc) - -,„ .a 1 Wkwas r2 As to AN grantors STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER NON- HOMESTI AD. in O.R. Book 1617, Page 1477, Pubic Ra"dt which hen an app9dmme outstanding G�oa1 Gramoit Ali Iday and year first above wrinem. Cl The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ZL:� day of,� "T. 1996, by JU&KLIM& . Such pas n(s) (Notary Public most deck applicable ben): I I it/we personally known to me. to produmd a /their current driver's lice (s). I I Produced Y idrallficsfi . (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) 'hfil 1) Npa7 �� ge lanwo hkurrs This instrument prepared by: ( Primed, Typed or Stamped Name of Notary Pubic) FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. Commission Number: 1010 Goodlette Road North My Commissica eapirec Naples, FL 33910 Tolepbtmc: (813) 262 -6455 IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE 111MARY K%M STATE Or nblAJ COMM8610N No CCxxn • KVMtSSMI MC '0'9* arrnnly "� 20511595 OR: 2183 PG: 1616 ewes I aricut owes of cat we11, n O /lJ /30 It 12:3012 e30e 1. F11w, coon tar 3030tt.21 'THIS INDENTURE, made this 14 thday of May, 1946, a le 1.30 11e -3I 1111.30 between NV: 11e1 i 1111111110 The fort M ls W xVkt of The United Methodist Church, lot. e of 1605 Royal Palm Drive, Ft, Myers, Florida 33981, as GRANTOR•, To Flrsl Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Ines as GRANTEE-, whose Pn+f office address is: 2132 Shadow/lawo Drive, Naples, Florida 33942 WITNFSSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS (S10Apj, and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Gran ter, the recripf whereof is hereby acknowledged. has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grant". and Grantees hcus and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and Mang in the County of Collier. State of Florida, to wit: The South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, less the West 130 feel thereof and the South 30 feet thereof, said land situated and lying in Collier County, Florida. Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification No, 0WI65ftaa18 SUBJECT TO that certain Mortgage by and Florida Corporation, as mortgagor and W. L Wide, u mmtgager5 as recorded n G.R. Bm SUBJECT TO lanes for the year 190% - c zoning ordinances of Collier (County,p� And said Grantor does hereby fully 4r rd lF persons whomsoever. • Singular and plural are inter han a e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grants bias ercunn Signed, sealed and delivered in the presewc of: ' \ 'Prm1 amt .1�. WitgEs4 /1 0 �'' me Y vNdacss I2 As to all grantors STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE set The Fort Myers District of the United Methodist Church, Inc_ a ini and Joseph DiFrana sco and Rita Dif ranersco, Husband and yy{ITcj-1 , Public Records of Collier County, Florida. year,, restrict iia�sfrc3Frnlions and easements of record, and win f-h the same against the lawful claims of an day and year rust above written. DISTRICT OF THE a CHURCH, INC. J BY: i, / /y/ Revrren witarel ohns,^ rest o The foregoing 6wrumen was acknowledged before me this, • 'day of May, 1996, by Reverend Margaret )uhnson, President of The Fun Myers District of the United Methodist Church, Inc. a Florida Corporation, on behaalf of the corporation. Such person(s) (Notary Public most check applicable Wxy 1/1 is /are Personally known w mt. Produced a /their currem drivers hcenst(s). pwafuced as idenlirwation. ( NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) /. _ J, , Notary —Pu�sc Srgnalore This instrument prepared hy: Prmle or SC4rppF y u s �- FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. Comm uuf1nnbuoicd,v.�,cus+a,a 1000 Goodlcttc Road North My C iFapisatw rov. oa, +am Naples, Fl, 33900 ran� Telephone: (941) 262-6455 aoa+asasm IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE This Instrument Prepared By: John Paulich III, Esq. Paulich, Slack 6 Wolff, P.A. 2150 Goodlette Road Naples, FL. 34102 Parcel Z.D. Number(s): 00417960005 Grantee(s) Tax I.D. is 2094215 OR: 2224 PG: 0064 RBCORDED 10 Mt:fIA! RBfORO$ cI CDLLlIR COUBTt. t: 04101/96 it 09:10AK 9YIG3t R. BROCK. C'-SRI Coss 9:000.00 RBC 111 10.9 D0C -.'o 04.00 Retr.: I19ST THLB K ABSTRAC? DICK UP THIS WARRANTY DEED made the day of August, 1996, by ROBERT E. ANDERS and hereinafter called the FIRST ASSEMBLY F"-GOD a Florida co ra}AVW -1 whose postoffice hereinafter call M. ANDERS, husband and wife, OF NAPLES, FIDRIVA, INC., 1 Drive WITNESSETH: T "t' he Grantor, jh yo consideration of the sum of $10.00 and of N aluab'e cons' s, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, eby grants, ns, sells, aliens, remises, releases, con d co he Grantee, all that certain lend situate in �j�- Florida, viz: The South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East; less the West 30 feet reserved for Public Right of Way, said land being in Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and To Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1995; and subject to all easements, restrictions and reservations common to the subdivision. In Witness whereof, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed s delivered in our presences Witness N1 Signature W tness /1 Printed Name /I. witness iZ signature/ iJj STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing inm day of August, 1996 by ( � ) are personal t,PV Pt, OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL NANCY K MAC MILLAN COMMISSION NUMBER a " r CC257569 MY COMMISSION EXP. Of FLT FED. 5 1997 OBERT E. ANDERS �T I {ill f—q was ackno Yi bd before me this E. ANDE JORIE M. ANDERS, who q or ( ) provided x = �sl. tification. Notary Public 0 N N N .s. -o c'a 0 O rn c sY K K » This Instrument Prepared By: John Paulich III, Esq. Paulich, Slack 6 Wolff, P.A. 2150 Goodlette Road Naples, FL. 34102 Parcel I.D. Number(s): 00417920003 Grantee(s) Tax Z.D. is 2094468 OR: 2224 PG: 0695 amm U Rtfc116 U= of Mum tiff, n 19144144 at "14U MICR 1. I=, can toll !1441.44 Uc M ll.il lOc -.71 644.0 bu: 11M tltU 6 USW ?Iet R ONLY WITHOUT AR PIT OF TITLE SEARCH OR OPINION THIS WARRANTY DEED made the L" I day of August, 1996, by MARIE F. PANZETTA, hereinafter called t ntor, to FIRST ASSEMBLY OF OF FLO ID , INC., a Florida cor r tion, - whose postoffice a d a : N 2 a o Drive ri 1 8, 2 hereinafter called Grantee, J L� WITNESSETH: The Grantor, for consideration of the sum of $10.00 and othe able consi one, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, rgains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, convey �- unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Coll unty, Florida, viz: The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East; less the West 30 feet reserved for Public Right of Way, said land being in Collier County, Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and To Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the **t OR: 2224 PG: 0696 "t Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1995; and subject to all easements, restrictions and reservations common to the subdivision. In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed 6 delivered in our presence: W t�ness * Signature Inez '-Stein Witness N1 Printed Name Witness i2 ianatuf OF FLORIDA I` f" COUNTY OF COLLIERP he foregoing in T day of August, 1996 b} known to me or ( ) identification. My Commission Expires: MARIE F.�PANZETTA CQtJ was 14ed before me this " who (. <) is personally as Notary Public yy;. (am) N N U .4W TMINDENTURAwAtbislst dayof November, 1996, betwaea Jasaa R Jain of 200 Eddea'ater Drite, Coral Gable, Fl. 33133, u GRANTOR-, To Flyd Aaasbly of God of Naples, Fluida, loo, a Florida corporation as GRANTEE', whore pool office adhas h: 2132 Skadowlarm Drive, Naples. Fl. 34112 't" 115934 M: 2247 PG: 1S94 "' L IIIle1LL IIIONI of cam MM, R fill III at N:11N 11110111111' 1. NOM, cum NN low.N me M 1.0 W_.JO i1111.911 Mta nw TITII F anucl OIM WITNESSETK thin the Grader, for and in eoacideratioe of the sum ei TFN DOLLARS (S10BD), and other good ad valuable goem f utioot do MW Grader in hand paW by rid Gnatee, the me* wbana h hereby tir granted, barQaieed sent" to the rid Grantee, and Gradmt heirs and acvgm forever. the following dosabd Joint sitnatt, lying and Wall in the Cotsmy of Collier, Site of Fbrida, to wit The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Sodium 14. Township 511 Somlt, floor 26 Eon, Ion the Wert 100 fad therca4 n'Iuntd ad V% in Collier County, Florida Property Appraiser's Pared Idettlificadioo No. —OKIMULL ' THE PROPERTY HEREIN IS VACANT, UNIMPROVED LAND, AND THEREFORE NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR. SUBJECT TO sane, fm the year 1996 and sttbscquent years, restrictions, reservations ad easements of record, and inning mdinanam of Collier County. Florida. And "W Gramm dos hereby fully warrant the lit ,yam person whomsoever. ' Suyular and plural we inlerchan t'f, /,'O� context trrequire& IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Gramm bas ere�a' Chic mt�/oc�s�Ent —ni Signed, scalocl seen and delivered f( r a I k' f t!_ in ILK presence of ♦1 Wrnas i2 - -� As do a0 grantoer ` Clip" STATE OF _ M&BI DA COUNIV OF nnnp the some against the lawful claims of all year fuss above writtca The finegoiag instrument wm acknowledged before me this rte/ , day of 6, 47�-1' . 1996, by . jamcs R. ju& . ea( Such perss) (Notary Public must check appliemble bur): �AI is/ass personally known to me. I produced a /their current driver's licease(s). l I produced _. ( NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) _ / (, 1Z !rmx /7 t -- .. aN�jlkpngnatme as idcntirkalioa. This instrument prepared by: to ype m Slam ante awry P FIRST TITLE R ABSTRACT, INC. Commission Number. IM Goodlette Road North My Commission cxpu= Naples, FL 34102 Telephone: (941) 262-6455 N!AMnY NAVAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE INSURANCE '., :, "' ot'hdda M, C_,.- :.: M.t 5.2000 let°: 2118929 OR: 2250 PG: 2324 �" A.: 111 A. °° M" TITLI A AISTRACT IICOIDID B the OMCIAL IICOIDS of COLL111 COOITT. IL iC . ?O RICK DT I1/15/91 at 191Ag HIM 1. 1AOC1 CL111 QUIT- CLAIM DEED THISOUIT- CLAIMDEED, Ea Vlacdthi, 12day.d tiuv,vober, IV9G by STANLEY A. CRONIG, AS TRUSTEE AND INDIVIDUALLY. lint party--. wlutse address is 47 Lakeside, Driry East, C cater,ilk, MA 020, W2. to FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES, FLORIDA. INC., whose a,hhex, 1, 2121 Shaduw•lawn Drive, Naplcx, Fknida V4112. wcond Iarty ": WITNESSETH, that said first (arty, for and in cumidvatiam of the mm td Tell anJ ms /IW (SIU.W) Dutlaq in hand paid by said wumd party, the recalx whcrc•td is hcnebs aakmmIcdbwd, dtws herebv rcmiw, release and quit -maim unto the said senmd party hncvvr, all right, title, interest. claim and demand which the said fiat panv has in and to the foRtming devrhd LA, Piece or Parcel of land, situate, king and Ming i,: C'ultict County. Flrxida, btwi[ SW 114 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11,'1'own,hip A) South, Range % East; C•ulber County, Florida; THIS DEED IS INTENDED TO C'ONVF:Y Al.l. PROPERTY RESERVED BY GRANTOR IN PRIOR WARRANTY DEEDS FOR PUBLIC RIG11T OF WAYS AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OVER AND ACROSS THAT PROPERTY FOR IN(iRF_l'S AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITIBN SECTION IJ, TOWNSHIP 91 SOUIII, RANGE 26 F:A.S•T, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECI PROPERTY IS VACANT UNIMPROVED LAND AND THEREFORE NOT THE IIOMESTEAD OF TLIE GRANTOR. 'TO IIAVE AND'TO IIAJLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thercumo belonging or in anvwiw appertaining, and all the estate, right, title intcrcq. lien, equity, and claim whalstx <cr 4 the said lint panv, either in law or equity, to the nnly proper use, irnrtit .,sad Idn-d sal ihr said second Icuty foresee. 'FrN Party' and 'Second Party are used fur laftrn(f till dal and sear Jiae aM n'e wMhw. S;Ane.t sealed m1d away d in au, luse•nre: � (imnn• r>/ Bumnunh• I hCrrbc crm /Y that IM this du)', bt fare mc, wt , fit, r doh unthon:ed;n the Arne afiarsa;d and in the•,Ines afowsaid /o take arkmmMdRrmrnts. InnrutalA• uppearrd.STANLEY.a. CRO:NIG. AS TRUSTEE AND INDIVIDLALLI: tome knussn w be the ry•rvm dnrribed in. ,n -h. has pnnlunrl a ,!Herr', /i.rmr a. idrrnifirni,ar, and he eereuted the J7vgvdng in,lnarrrnt and arknu- lydged n,•f,.m me that he et,cuh•J the sus -- f 11 Orr ln,rlvnr rh"n rqu.ase•d and -1111 d;d not rake ut ,aril. WITNESS 111Y hand and,%frnal s,v1;n the ,'Wars and ,cute ulbrrsaid thu I _'t h J., of / Novembe I-, I w) r. . Pant h'mnr: / PREPAX4 r10N OF DOCUAJENI U,'s7.1 Mark J. Wwnl -sank Esquire (SE4L) W nsdwunk Piers, Andrnun A L, +nbunhc P_a. N)1 Laurel Oak hire, Suite 6111 Nuplrs. FL 13A63 Teleph,me: 1811) 9ha,IlJl ' Y. ' t • • �• / ). t inm1,r w-i Lvwes: "MUS M SAWN t binmissi11n A4nnM•c pa,•, e,.niY hli T.oam, -enl yva Ay,as. ZW2 PREPAX4 r10N OF DOCUAJENI U,'s7.1 Mark J. Wwnl -sank Esquire (SE4L) W nsdwunk Piers, Andrnun A L, +nbunhc P_a. N)1 Laurel Oak hire, Suite 6111 Nuplrs. FL 13A63 Teleph,me: 1811) 9ha,IlJl QUIT -CLAIM DEED THM W? -CLAM DEED, f canned tlu: t 1 day of Ault, A.D. 1997, by Joseph L Gary, first party'•, whom; address is 95 Council Rock Avenue, Rochester, NY 14610 to Ptrat Unstably at Cad of Naples. Fledds, tae. Whose ad&= is 2132 Shademlowo Mive, Napka, Florida 34114 second party ": WM4ESWrK the said first patty, for and in consideration of the cum of Tea and m /100 (510.00) Doftaq in had paid by said second party. the receipt wheeeof Is hereby ackoowkdgrA, does botchy remise. reksse and qub•daim auto the said second party forover, aft rigW, IiUe. Worm claim and demand which the told fast party has in and to the following detail" tot, pica; or parts! of l and, situates lying and being us Collier County. Florida, to-wit: The South 30 feel, of the Wed K of the Southeast V. of the Sombcast V. of the Northwest V� Section 14, Township SO South, RMP 26 Bm4 ColScr County, Florida Folio ID d 00417 880004 AND The South 30 fat, of the West K of the Southwest V. of the Southeast K of the Northwest V.. Section 14. Township 50 Seth, Range 26 P.ad, Cotlks County, Florida Folio ID d 00416880005 AND The South 30 feet, of the Cast K of the Southwest V. of the Southeast K or the Northwest K, Section 14 Township 50 Sontk Range 26 East, falter County, Fonda Folio ID 00041784000Z- SUBJECT PROPERTIES are vacam unimproved land and therefore not the htwnestcad of the Gramm. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together wbl so anywise apperlaisiq, and all the estate, right, W , law or equity, to the only proper use, bcnwfA ` •' -Fad Party' and - Seeood Party' are £ingular or plural, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The/3 Sir" sealed and dnivered Wla�rr Tfif" CI State of NEW YORK Cawy of MONRO£ and singular the appurica-m es thereunto belonging or ,, and claim wiouaver of the said Ent party, either in NO party fore ere�verew she day and yew fort above wsiuen. iL (SEAL) 215857 OR: 2338 PG: 3142 *111; Uc01w1 is o/H[IU 1116101 of WILI11 MMI, 11 01/11/11 at U:14u 0YIG811. MCI, full sic 111 1.0 twf -.8 .11 lots: f111111111 1 USTUt7 1110 1f The forego(ng butrmnent was ackom, 4t ed before erw this "day of May, 1997, by loseph E. Geary. Such penon(s) (Notary Pub& must (hark appn*,uue bar): 1.I B /aro pm--Uy Anown to me- t I produced a /their ew M mive?h lirrnse(r). I I produced m identification. /IhLut. /1 e•, ,•:. nom.: -. ni ': Notary Public PYbt Hams .aA Cic I S1rvi rC C.remfts crN bz . ; 6/ - >�y r Ca.un6slo+s Number. q �S' % 'Id f MAN rns.ynra�a C>tnmthatan"19obaa� Gosh tft. lt�,y C' Mork 1. WOadwmd PJpwe (SEAL) Woodww4 Pbar; d Lanbwdq P.A. -, 001 Lnsud Oat dives Suute 600 (� N.#M PL 34100 Ugahmer f911) 566 -JBI PJIMAJUM R4IIIOUT OPINION OF If72.E This instrument prepared by: Shannon M. Luis, Esq. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 5300 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 -2339 Parcel Identification Nos.: 00416840003 00416920004 2997727 OR: 3054 PG: 1480 PJIOIMI A OMM lltgq of CUM tttt#fl, IL K1111alma at mm, cm 1011 MO." 1K M If." een: W-.71 10.0 arum MM R 1L 401 T'WW t'111L NM 410# ttlm n 11111 THIS INDENTURE made this'day of June, 2002 by FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, INC., a Florida non -profit corporation, whose post office address is 3805 The Lord's Way, Naples, Florida 34114 (hereinafter, *QW0 "), to VISION & FAITH, INC., a Florida corporation, whose post office address is 8250 Collier Blvd., Naples, Florida 34114 (hereinafter "UaWg&')1 (wherever ��"gmn&' and Gra°tee„ include the respective parties to this instnun and assigns). ITNESSETH: THAT Grantor, for in nsidera e s of T Do ars ($10.00), to it in hand paid by Grantee and other a ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, arg n an 1 to d t 's successors and assigns forever, the following descn i o ounty, Florida, to wit: See Exhibit A attached and made a part . f. TOGETHER with all the �49 hereditamen urtenances thereto belonging or appertaining. � , C lv,0- . SUBJECT to restrictions, reservations, easements and limitations of record, provided that this shall not serve to reimpose same, zoning ordinances, taxes for the current year and subsequent years (the "Permiaggt Elgattiens'). And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawtLl claims of all persons whomsoever, subject to the Permitted Exceptions. [end of page; signature and acknowledgement continued on following page] Q000lEtrE, 0000 a,aru", P.o� 4001 TerthW 7190, N. p� —� 86 a Nep4 R 94108 n.Mv44em3.1 OR: 3054 PG: 1481 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF in the prgeence of NAPL , FLORIDA, INC., n �'1 /1 a Floriingr}prgt corporation f NIMRIrrr=' Witness CQtj, STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing ins as acknowledged re e day of June, 2002, by J. David Mallory, the Presid FIRST ASSE F OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, INC., a Florida non -p fit co io on behalf of the co He is personally known to me or has produced as ' on. (Affix Notarial Stamp or Seal) �, c�icnwa� MYCOM SSIONMOS7te j f:1 ,wz' is ,M. a+wn..�s►r ur.... -2- i- MUM W753 OR: 3054 PG: 1482 The East Y2 of the East '/a of the Southeast' /4 of the Northwest 4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, situated and lying in Collier County, Florida. I- Mwrems.l �Z'R CO TYt I� I A -1 0. Aw THIS OBI M URE, =We this I I t h,%y It A o 0997, between Will w. YrhssYP W Barbara tltihwsNP, Hrabaad W of 610 OW Vertara Farm Road, Hammehtown, PA I7a06, an GRANTOR-, To First AwwmW of Gad of IiNib, rkd& , twr. a Rarwin cmel roam, as GRANTEE•, whorepoa ofrre address in. 2572 SMdoadawm Drive Naples, Florida 30112 * ** 2215859 OA: 2338 PG: 3144 * ** "emu it 011110" "caw et 0MU 00", u 08/15/10 at WHU "low 1. on, cuu CM 1100.0 Be M 11.1 00c•.TO 0190.0 lIM tIIIT TITO I "OT "R Nct 111 WITTBSSEM that the Grantor, for and or coasWerath, of the sun of TEN DOLLARS (31000), and other good aW vahmbfe ooaridvatiou to SAW Grantor in hand Paid by said Grantee, the receipt wiereol is hereby wjawwladged, ha, Vmb4 bargained and DOW to the uW Grantee, and Graotea's been W aarigm Iorever, are following deaerbed b4 rtna0 . lying and being in 16e COMO of Col4er, State of PIo ids, to wit: The End 1/2 of the Eft 1/2 of are Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1 /I, Section 10, Town hip 10 Smak Range 26 East, ahwad and lying In couer County, Florida. GRANTOR HEREBY GRANTS and declare+ a. over W wrier the Sowth 3o fen of subject I owraess of abutting lams. , suamCT TO toes for the year 1997 ordimmos of Corer County, Florida. AND SAm GRANTOR does hereby of d persons whoaaaew. SwmL sealed am deiveed is the presence, GE As to all grantor, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF DAUPHIN Jwq.. and Placement of public "r,t ruecrsaors wad assigns and all current casamcats of record and walag the same aplast the lawful claims year first above wring. t tip, I Ce11,110 "1 i Barbara�lao7ceasbp news 1ti A.q, A and Barbrss Blmdm* hip. Such perwe(s) public m d c ` day ox): 0997, M George W. lil.ntaaship appliesble boa): 4 i is /are personally haoww to me. ( j produced ,/their current diners hocose(s). ( j produced aridwification. T NotW Public S' a aftmdim 7:la:arr�e.t PRFara+ by: sapiw ewaaawwwar PORT TITLE A ABSTRACT', INC. artltNtrr..r tiaar 1010 Genoese, Road North ( NOTARY P®UC SEAL) " TWO6. in a�� F2000 To .. Ill �t wrrH THE ISSUANCE OF TITLE tNSU ' r., E� aF�y F x� F `1 1\ Corrective �arranty�,})�{�eed� IRIS INDENTURE. made du day of -a&-'2W5, between Barbara Long, a Married Wotnaa, of 835 Cassena Road, Naples, FL 34108, as GRANTOR. To First Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporatior, as GRANTEE, whose post officc address is: 2132 Shadowlawn Dive, Naples, FL 33962 * ** 3706843 OR: 3899 PG: 4027 RICOROIB is OFFICIAL RICOIDS of C011I11 COOITT, 11 05/29/2005 at 01:11AX OUGHT 1. SHOCK, CUB TIC FIT 10.00 OOC -30 .IO Lela: FIRST TITAI i ABSTIA(T PICT OF WITNFSSEIH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable considerations w said Grantor in hand paid by said Gramm, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantees heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to wit: The North 55 of the South Ya of it. Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 Fast, less the West 100 feet thereof, said land situated and lying in Collier County, Florida. Property Appraisers Parcel Identification No. 0041800000/3 SUBJECT TO woes for the year 2005 and subsequent of Collier County, Florida I AND SAID GRANTOR does hereby fully v whomsoever. - Singular and plural are intercha TRIS Corrective Deed is being recorded to IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Grantor has her Signed, sealed and delivered in the presenc f: /< (Sigp) U l 4 (Print N ) (Sig Stephanie . So (Sig (Print Nam ` s' Witness q2 As to all grantors STATE OF FLORIDA said land, and hand Barbara and easements of record, and zoning ordinances the lawful claims of all persons first above written. COUNTY OF COLLIER 'y�� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,Jay of. \ , 2005, by Barbara long, petson(s) (Notary Public must check applicable box): I I 1 is/arc personally known to me. ,yattsllal-STMr�� produced a/their current driver's licem e(s). NI -S E 9. produced__— as idermficana, This instrument prepared by Mark L Woodward, Esq. WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, PA 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 Telephone: (239) 649-6555 PREPARED WrMOUT OPINION OF TITLE tM' a re r (Printed Name of Notary Public) Commission Number: My Commission expires: ( NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) Such ;. AFFIDAVIT Exhibit V.G.5 We /l, L/uy &Zta g being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am /are the owners of the prop described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a pan of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. WeII understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner Well further authorize Robert L Duane of Hole Monies to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this Petition. brtlltn NAtl_o�Y — PrJJtAs -�.-� Typed or Printed Name of Owner Signature of Property (honer Typed or Printed Name of Owner 77re foregoing instrument was acknowledged b4ore me this ) 3 day of 2o��by —� � ,� �� wh is perso Ily known to me or has roduced ___ __as identNeation. State of Florida County of Collier (Signature of Notary Public -State of Florida) DENISE LARSON Notary Stamp �q� N / ��.� ay a, 2ppgm8 �9bc AFFIDAVIT We /1, 1"41114M L - X O k heino first duh, t --- ..,, ­I .......t_, .__n am /are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner Well further authorize Robert L Duane o(Hole Montes to act as our /my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner Signat 1"41 li�t_ �", Z-. kla�, Typed or Printed Name of Owner The joregoin instrument wa acknowledged be ore me this day of �i- v�2_q�e 20j��by1a wh is perso Ily known to me or has produced Qs identification. State of Florida (Signature oJNotary Public - State oJFlorida) County of Collier r�, DENISE= L',. _.3 JN y+4�r Y DENISE IARSpN Notary Stamp y ?gyp � EJ(PI�RESrogey3 2W6 ,aooariorggv KHUSy sa.Rea en,u„¢mc V01bit V •C.6 � 1 5I AssQ1tibly e puId prdinan� R 0RDINAT10E99- a,� ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE CA ouIER CO TilE Nt Moff'CODE, WH1CHGULATIOONS FOR SIVE ZONING RE p OF COLLIER CT"F. RIMI}eoRpORATE ID Y ING �TFIE I•T. NG ATLAS MAP gwCAT1014 OF OFFICIAL �� IE ZONmr, CI' S ERTY FROM BY CHAN DESCRIBED REAL PUO" TO "?M" OWN UEREIN AS TM -AA RURALUNIT DEV"Pmx EKN Af10N AND PLANNED FBtST SON C�US �, FOR PR OF THE REl1AB IN THE NORTfiEAST C 95RNE'kW THE I' EW ON IN SEAN 14, 'TO COUNTY' SOLTTI , NGE 26 OF ACRES; FLORIDA, CONSISTINGG REYVAL OF' ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THEAMENDSD. THE FORMER FIR TES �B ASMBNSTRlES EDUCATION $ N CAMPUS PUD; AND REHABILITATION DATE. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ver Plarmiug+ representing Rev. David Mallory and the issioners to change the carting -- WHEREAS, William L. Hoover of Hon First Assembly of God Church' petitioned the Board of Cotmty Co1nm real PeiW' TIIE BOARD OF COUNTY classification of the berm described PjO BY NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED , COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID located in Section 14, Township SESDWONE Classification of the berein described real property Agricultural and "PUD" The Zoniug is changed Umn A" Rural em as Collier County, Florida, ument, attars ed her 50 South, Range 26 East. the PUD Doc menl in accordance With e Opal Zoning ed Unit Develop hereof. Tb to "PUO" Plane erein and by mfercoce made part d which is iueorpomted b 91 -102, the Colliec•11II' Lan Exbibit "A In Ordinance Number Atlas Map number 061314, as described - are hereby amended accordingly DcvclopmeulCode > -, Number 96-58, as emended. 1moWn as the Foal Assembly Mnustn 'i u'Att 1996 by Ore Board of County Co> "_ssitin m Ordinance m -- - adopted on October 81 v Rehabilitation Campus PUD, adoP Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. I- This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Departrnent of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collief County, Florida, this Lcmay 04 1999. ATTEST -. ' Ji DWIGHT E. BROG4C„ Clerk =: Y yes_ .,�..,,, •n e Att {St.ai_to chalrwt'a slgail6ti'mil - Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency YYIu...,n„��, 771. <Ba.,f Marjo Assistant County Attorney s�,amilllrowuo.96 tai roitniruNCfi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6Y: S. MAC' ICIE, Chairw man This ordinance filed with the Secretory of tate's Office the Z-11. doy of ;$,,_, \R44 and ocknowWgernent of that iifi'�Q eceived this Intl day of _ 63RD' -Sbau - y�O ' Clete 2- flesT ASSEMBLY MIMmilfS E9Memen a ammitnumm cores A FLA MMR AEr U MEMT PREPARED FOR: REV. DAVID MALLORY FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 2132 SHADOWLAWN DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PREPARED BY: WILLIAM HOOVER, AICP HOOVER PLANNING 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 and BEAU KEENE, P.E. KEENE ENGINEERING 538 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 DATE FILE April 7, 1999 DATE REVISED August 19. 1999 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC u ust 19 1999 DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER S EXHIBIT ^A" TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION SECTION 11 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SECTION 111 CAMPUS AREAS PLAN SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS PLAN SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 0 PAGE 1 3 6 9 16 17 0 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B PUD WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT C TYPICAL INTERNAL ROAD SECTION FOR TTRVC LOTS T, STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 79.1 acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The community facilities of the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: 1., The subject property is designated as Urban Residential Fringe on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier Count' Growth Management Plan, which permits the proposed land uses. 2. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection between C.R. 951 and The Lord's Way. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the location of land uses for community and residential facilities, as permitted by the Future Land Use Element. 3. This proposed rezoning is in the form of a Planned Unit Development as required by the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. 4. The proposed project will be responsible for all its necessary water management improvements, including the routing of an appropriate water through the project's water management system, as required by the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 5. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element 6. Group Housing, which includes care units and adult living facilities, is permitted in the Urban Designated Areas per Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element. 7. Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Parks are Permitted within this Urban Designated Area, since the project has direct access to an arterial roadway (C.R. 951) and is compatible with surrounding land uses, as required in the description of the Urban Designated Areas in the Future Land Use Element. 8. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's intensity of land uses as required in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 9. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan. 10. Ail final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Lard Development Code as set forth in Policy 3.1 of the Future Land Use Element, 11. The density of the TTRVC, pre unit facility, and adult living facility shall be guided by the Land Development Code while the proposed 57 dwelling units and density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre for the multi -family units is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan based on the following relationships to required criteria: Maximum Permitted Density: Maximum Allowable Acreage Maximum Density Maximum Units Land Ilse 10.0 12.0 Units Per Acre 120 Campsites TTRVC Palk 15.5 400 Rooms Adult Living Facility / 15.5 400 Beds Care UntFacility / 36.1 1.5 Units Per Acre 57 Units MuMfamily , 79.1 Total Acreage 'Development standards and density are subject to Section 2.6.26 of the Land Development Code. Maximum allowable acreage and the number of units will not be exceeded. Residential density shall apply only to residential development tracts and not to tracts developed for non - residential purposes as required by Section 2.2.20.3.1 of the Land Development Code. SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set torts the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project narne of First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 79.1± acres, and located in Section 14, Township 50 South, and Range 26 East, is described as: The Southern half of the Northwest Quarter, less right- ol-way, of Section 14, Township 505, Range 26E, Collier County, Florida. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by the First Assembly of God Church, 2132 Shadowlawn Drive, Naples, Florida 34112, 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located at the northeast comer of the intersection between County Road 951 and The Lords Way (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The property is currently vacant- The entire project site currently has PUD Zoning, except for the eastern 10.3 -acre parcel being added and the 8.64 acres closest to the intersection of County Road 951 and The Lord's Way which is zoned United Methodist Church 951 PUD (PUD 93-3) and approved for a 20,000 square toot church. The entire project is proposed to be rezoned to a new PUD with the same name. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The elevation of the property is epprorimately 111' NGVD based on the USGS Belle Meade 7.5- Minute Quadrangle Map. The site is within Flood Zone 'X' per Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA FIRM Panel #120067 - 0610 -D date June 3, 1986). 3 The predominate sod type of the srte is #49- Hallandale and Boca Fine Sand according to the current Collier County Soil Maps. There is also an area in the Northwest comer of the site identified as #14 - Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum. The site vegetation is primarily hydric one flatwoods with an area of cypress in the northwest corner of the property. The majority of the site has been heavily invaded with melaleuca trees; eradication of this exotic species onsite is underway as of the date of application of the PUD rezone package. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD will - include a mixture of land uses for religious, communiy social services, and residential uses in a campus -type setting. This wide mixture of land uses is also intended to provide some services on- site, which will provide convenience for the many non- mobile residents and minimize traffic generation from the campus. The key facilities at build -out will include a maximum of. an auditorium for predominantly church use with 1800 seats, a chapel with 600 seats, a private school for 300 students in grades kindergarten through high school or Bible college, a child/adult care facility for 450 chikiren/aduds, a care unit facility with 400 beds, TTRVC for 120 travel trailer or park model lots, an adult living facility W 400 group housing units, and 57 multi-family units. If not all of the 120 lots within the TTRVC or all of the 400 units of the adult frying facility are constructed, those unused unfits would be replaced with multi- farniy units at a density of 1.5 units/acre. Some of the more visible accessory uses for residents and students include: numerous inside and outside recreational facilities, cafeterias, infirmary for residents and students, printing shop a radto/television broadcasting studio, a 500 -foot high radioltelevision lower, library . collection and distribution of used clothing and furniture, hair salon, labor pool for the o k -site homeless, bus/vehicle maintenance garage, cemetery, and facilities management offices. The First Asserrrbly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD intends to establish guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for proposed features and facilities. Uniform guidelines and standards will be created for such features and facilities as landscaping, signage, lighting, roadway treatments, fences and buffers. Furthermore, a similar architectural theme will be maintained throughout the campus for all structures and signage, as described in Section 4.81) of this PUD Document- The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A ". PUD Master Plan. A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreage is shown on the plan. 1.7 PHASING PLAN The project is intended to be developed in 2 major phases with the first phase being initiated in 1999 At-this time, Phase 1 is intended to be constructed for the following described uses: a care unit facility for 400 persons, TTRVC park for up to 120 units, children's weekly summer camp, 57 apartrnents, church with a chapel of 000 seats, adult living facility for up to 120 units, childladult pre for 225 children/adults, and a private school for 150 students. All of these principal use facilities may not be initially constructed to their limits, but would likely be constructed in several minor phases within Phase 1. Phase 11 is planned at this time for the following: expansion of the child/adult pre facility to 450 children/adubs, expanding the adult living facility to 400 units, expanding the school to 300 students, and adding an auditorium that would seat 1800 persons beyond the 600 seats provided in the church chapel. Phase 11 would bkely be initiated in three to four years with completion of the principal facilities by approximately the year 2003. 1.8 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shag be known and cited as the "First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Planned Unit Development Ordinance. 5 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the Project, as well as other project relationships. 22 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD shag be in accordance with the contents of this document, PUD- Planned Unit Development District, applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Collier County Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of local final development order or building permit application_ Where Neese regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of Me most similar district in the Collier County Land Development Code shag apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all lomn shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the date of adoption of this PUD. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus PUD shall become Part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD remain in full torte and effect E. Development Permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurroncy review under the provisions of Division 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval, or building pemnt Issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A, PUD Master Phan. B. Areas Illustrated as lakes on Exhibit 'A' shall be constructed as lakes or, upon approval, parts thereof may be constructed as shallow depressions for water detention purposes. Such areas, lakes and dry areas shall be of the same general configuration and contain the same general acreage as shown by Exhibit "K. Minor modification to all areas, lakes or other boundaries may be permitted at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat or She Development Plan approval, subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the COINer County Land Development Code or as otherwise pematted by this PUD Document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown in Exhibit W. easements such as (utIlity, private, semi - public, etc.) shall be established and/or vacated within or along the property, as may be necessary. 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Exhibit W. PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Except as otherwise provided within this PUD Document, any division of the property and the development of the land shah be in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. The provisions of Division 3.3, Site Development Plans of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts. or parcels of land as provided in said Division 3.3 prior to time issuance Of a building permit or other development order. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of inkastructural improvements regarding any dedications and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOC rMENT OR PUD MASTEg PLAN Amendments may be made to Om PUD as provided In Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code. 2.6 PROVISION FOR OFF -SITE REMOVAL OF EARTH N MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and its stock piling in preparation of water management faalities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby pemmitted. If after consideration of fill activities on those buildable portions of Are project site are such that there is a surplus of earthen material, then its off -she disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: 1. Excavation activities shall compy with the definition of a 'development excavation' pursuant to Section 3.5.5.1.3 of the Land Development Code, whereby oft -site removal shall be limited to 10% of the total calculated excavated volurne to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. 2. AN other provisions of Division 3.5 Excavation of the Land Development Code are applicable. 6 SECTION M CAMPUS AREAS PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for Tracts A, B. C, and D of the site as shown on Exhibit W, PUD Master Plan. 3.2 MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITYANTENSITY Development on the l project shall not exceed the following limits: a multi- purpose audilpr'urn ++�h J9DB slats, chapel with 600 seats private kindergarten through high sriro o &ble college r 300 students, chrkUaduH pre (or 450 childrerdadutls, pre unit facility for 400 persons on j5. acres, TTRVC for 120 travel trailer or park model lots only (at 12 lotsfacre on iD acres). �R j Ing facility of 400 units on 15.4 acres, and 57 multi- farmily units (1.5 units/acre on 38.3 acres). If not all of the 120 lots within the TTRVC or all of Me 400 units of the adult living facility are constructed, those units may be replaced with multi- family units at a density of 1.5 units/acre. 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The PUD Master Plan has been designed to provide religious services, educational and rehabilitation social services, and residential homes within a Christian campus abnosphere. Generally the more aesthetic and least intensive land uses have been planned for the western half of file site. The 79.1i acre site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection between County Road 951 and The Lord's Way. 3.4 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected. altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than shown below. Following the permitted use in parenthesis Is the designated Tract(s) on the PUD Master Plan where such use is permitted. Accessory uses. shall be of such nature to serve the principal uses, on-stte residents, and campus visitors directly associated with the principal uses. A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Church. (Tracts A, B. C. and D) 2. Private school (kindergarten through high school or religious Bible college) (Tracts A, B. C, and D). 3. Child careladult day care center (Tracts A, B, C and D), 4. Care unit facility (Tracts A and B), subject to Section 2.6.26 of the Land Development Code, S. Multi- Family units (Tracts A, B, C and D). 6. Travel Trailer Recreation Vehicle Campground (residents must be directly involved with the campus facilities and no tent campsites permitled)(Tracts A and B), 7. Adult living facility /nursing home (Tracts A and B), subject to Section 2.6.26 of the Land Development Code. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures - t. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document (Tracts A, B, C, and D), 2. Guard house/campus security office (Traps A, B, C, and D). 3. Cafeteria (shall be an integral part of a principal use for on -site residents and visitors utilizing permitted principal uses on the campus only) (Tracts A, B, and C). 4. Labor Pod (for on -site care unit residents only) (Tract A). S. Library (Tracts A, B and C). 6. Collection and distribution of used clothing and furniture (within the care unit or facilities management building only) (Tract A). 7- Infirmary (shall be an integral part of a principal use for on -site residents and students only) (Tracts A, B arm) C). 6. Vehicle maintenance garage (to service vehicles providing campus bus and van transit only and to provide classes on vehicle maintenance) (Tract A). 9. Overnight bus parking (for campus buses only or for buses whose Passengers are utilizing permitted principal uses on the campus) (Tract A)- 10. Daytime bus parking (for campus buses only or for buses whose passengers are ubTzing permitted principal uses on the campus). 10 LE Permitted in Tracts A, B. C, and D, with a minimum setback of ftRy (50) feet from PUD boundaries and from the C.R_ 951 Canal. 11. Printing shop (to serve permitted principal uses on the campus only) (Tracts A, B and C). 12. Recreational and church camplyouth ranch (Tracts C, and D). 13. Radio and television tower (a 500 -foot guyed -tower (Tracts A B, and that portion of D located east of the F.P.L. Easement). 14. Rad'roAelevision broadcasting studio (Tracts A, B and C). 15. Facilities management office (Tracts A, B and C). 16. Counsefirg center (Tracts A, B and C). IT Conferenceiconvention facilities (must be in nature with the campus religious, educational or recreational facilities) (Tracts A, 8, C and D)_ 16. Hair salon (within tine care unit, and facilities management building and adult living facilities only) (Tracts A and B). 19. Recreational facilites, including but not limited to: gymnasiums, football fields, baseball fields, soccer fields, basketball courts, swimming pools, tennis courts. shuffle board courts, waterways for canoeing, gazebo, boal/fishing docks, boardwalks, horse/porry /llama stables and children's petting zoo (Tracts A, B, C. and D). 20. Carports/garages (Tracts A, B. C and D). 21. Cemetery (Tracts A, B and D). 22. Any other accessory uses and structures deemed comparable in nature by the Development Services Director. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Yards: (1) Principal structures: (a) Yards Along C.R. 951- One hundred (100) feet LE (b) Yards Along The Lords Way - Thirty-five (35) feet plus one (1) foot for each foot of building height over thirty -five (35) feet (c) Yards Along the Northern and Eastern PUD Boundaries - Thirty -five (35) feet plus one (1) foot for each foot of building height over thirty -five (35) feet. (d) Side Yards Between Two (2) Tracts Within the PUD - None, as long as the minimum building separation requirements are met as described in Section 3.5B. of this PUD Document (e) Yards from the internal paved vehicular use areas - Ten (10) feet unless attached to carports, garages or porkD& (f) The radiaAelevision tower will be separated from all property boundaries by a minimum distance of fifty percent (50%) of the tower height or certified fall zone radius, whichever is greatest. (2) Acoessory Structures: (a) Yards Along C.R. 951- Fifty (50) feet, except for fishing docks which have no setback requirements. (b) Yards Along The Lord's Way - Twenty-five (25) feet. (c) Yards Along the Northern and Eastern PUD Boundaries - Tweny4iive (25) feet except ten (10) feet for guy -wire anchors. (d) Stile Yards Between Two (2) Tracts Wigan the PUD - None. (e) Carports, garages and porticos are permitted within parking areas. B. Distam a Between Princioal Structurm (1) Fifteen (15) feet or one -hag (1f2) the sum of their helghte, whichever is greater, unless the structures are attached. t2 (2) The radiollelevision lower shag be separated a minimum of its fall - zone radius from any residential structures housing residents on a Permanent basis. No guyed wires shag be permitted over any residential structures lousing residents on a permanent basis. C. Minmium Building/Unit Size (1) Care unit facilities shall be a minimum of fifteen hundred (1500) square feet plus one hundred fifty (150) square feet per live -in person, beginning with the seventh (7th) five-in person. (2) Guardhouses, storage facilities, and other accessory structures shall not have to meet a minimum size requirement. (3) Care unit facilities shag be designed not to exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of DA5, as specified in Section 2.6.26 of the Land Development Code. (4) Child care centers/adult day care Centers shag meet all applicable development standards of the Land Development Code, D. Maximum Height (1) Church, adult living facility, and care unit facility shag be limited to silly -five (65) feet. (2) All other buildings shag be limited to foray (40) feet. E. Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Caimpground gequiremants. The campgrounds, of an approximate 10 acres overall park size, shag meet all the TTRVC requirements described in Section 22.11 of the Land Development �� ode, unless specified differently within this PUD discretion of h the TTRVC Pads may be operated throughout tire year, at the Property owner, but permanent residency shall not be Permitted TTRVC residends shall not occupy the same site more than six (6) consecutive months unless the residents are directly affiliated with an on -site religious or social Program. TTRVC residents di with an on-slt religious or social retie affiliate more then twee four 24 consecutive shalt not occupy the same site tY- ( ) ecutive months except for volunteer and paid stff. Accessory caMPWQ cabins are not pem*w. All lots must be at least 2,800 square feet in size and utilized for travel treiler /park model lots only, and all lots shag permanently remain rental loft (not subdivided and sold). An annual report showing TTRVC residency shall be submitted with the annually required PUD Monitoring report Such TTRVC annual report shag show the following for each TTRVC site: name(s) of residents, residents' affiliation with any on -site programs and the length of such programs, status as volunteer or paid staff, and dates residents moved4n and moved -out F. Off-Street Parkin and Loading Requirements: (1) Based on the requirements, that the campus be designed to Promote residents and visitors to travel on -site as pedestrians or bicyclists and the campus management to provide bushran transit for residents to the on-site Sunday church services and everyday convenient bustvan transit to off -site key traffic attractions, the parking or the following uses shag be as shown below. (a) Parking for the care -unit facility shall be one (1) space or each six (6) beds. (b) Parking for the church chapel and auditorium shall be one (1) space per our seats in the chapel or assembly area. (c) Parking for the vehicle and general maintenance building shall be one (1) space per seven hundred fitly (750) square feet (d) Parking shall not be required or the on -site accessory recreational uses. (e) The Development Services Director may administrativey approve joint parking in Tract C between the church and private school and/or chldtadult care facility, similar to that described in Section 23.5.4 of the Land Development Code, where the applicant can demonstrate that the parking supply Will suffice for all of the proposed uses at ad times in Tract C. The credit or this )pknt parking shall not exceed fifty (60) Percent of the required parking for the private school and/or childladult care facility. (2) All other land uses shall meet the standards of Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. G. Open Space Requirements: 14 A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or the gross area for the entire PUD shag be devoted to open space. as described in Section 22.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each Site Development Plan application demonstrating that the subject parcel has a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD totals a minirmun of thirty (30) percent open space. H. Buffering Requirements• (1) A twenty (20) foot wide Type 'D. Buffer shall be provided along County Road 951, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.4:7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (2) A ten (10) foot wide Type 'D' Buffer shall be provided along The Lords Way with the landscaping as required in Section 24.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (3) A fifteen (15) toot wide Type 'B' Buffer shag be provided along the eastern and northern PUD boundaries, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.4.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (4) Buffering between internal parcels of the campus $bag not be required so as to encourage OrFs" pedestrian and bicycle traffic. (5) Buffering and landscaping shall be provided around the perimeter Of the lower and anchors, per Section 2.6.35 of the Land Development Code. t✓L'1'�? (1) As described in Section 2.5.5.2.4.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code the entire project shall be fimIfed to one (1) pole or ground sign, with a maximurn sign area of one hundred (100) square fast, a minimum fifteen (15) foot setback from all rights -otway and easements, nm*n en "ht of twenty (20) feet, and with changeable copy permitted. (2) Signage shall also meet the architectural standards further described in Section 4.88. of this PUD Document is SECTION N PRESERVE AREAS PLAN 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Elhibil: W, PUD Master Plan. 4.2 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole of part, for other than the folloMrig: A Pemdted Principal Uses and Struclures- 1. Passive recreational areas including recreational shelters. 2. Biking, hiking, nature trails and boardwalks. 3. Water management structures. 4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 5. Supplemental landscape Planting. screening and buffering within the Natural Habitat Preserve Areas, after the appropriate enviromnental review. 6. Any other use deemed convarable in nature by the Development Services Director. 16 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5A PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable Stale and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shag apply to this project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shag be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document The developer, his successor or assignee, shag follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assignee in title, is subject to the commitments within this agreement 5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A Exhibit 'A', PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, IM or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval subject lo the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, ad may be amended from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other brstrumerds shag be granted to Insure tre continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project- 17 r 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENUMONITORING REPORT A Site Development Phan shag be submitted per County regulations in effect at time of site plan submittal. The project is proposed to be completed in several phases. A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. Momtorirm Report An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code_ 5.5 WATER MANAGEMENT A Excavation permits wig be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 3.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended. Excavated material from the property is intended to be used within the project site. B. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shag be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shag be issued unless and until approval of the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. C. In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFVIIMD), this project shag be designed for a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 -year frequency. D. Design and construction of all improvements shag be subject to compliance with th appropriate provisions of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Lanni Development Code. E. Use of grassed surface with a stabilized subgrade, shag be limited to the parking spaces. All parking aisles serving required parking spaces shall be paved. F_ Prior to Final SDP approval a Big Cypress Basin (SFWMD) Right- of-way Permit to allow discharge into the C.R. 951 Canal, shall be submitted. 5.6 UTILITIES A Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission, and interim water and sewage lmslment facilities to service the project are to be designed, 19 constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Coder CC rules and UFdY Ordinance No. 68.76, as amended, and other applicable County regulations, B. An customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection faclites to be constructed wig be customers of the County and cull be billed in accordance with the County s established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide water and /or sewer service to the Protect the water and/or sewer customers Shall be customers of the interim utlity established to service the project until the County's off -site water and/or sewer faclites are able to serve the project. C. It is anticipated that the County utilities Division will ultimately supply potable water to meet the consumptive demand and/or receive and treat the sewage generated by this project Should the County system not be in a position to supply potable water to the project and/or receive the project's wastewater at the fime development commences, the Developer. at his expense shat instep and operate interim water supply and/or interim on site sewage treatrtheM and disposal facilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies. An agreement shall be entered into between the County and the Developer, binding on the Developer his assigns or successors, regarding any interim treatment facilites to be utilized. The agreement must be legally sufficient to the County prior to the approval Of construction documents for the project and be in conformance with the requirements of Collier 86-76, as amended. County Ordinance No, D. If an interim on-site water supply, treatment and transmission facility is utilized to service the protect it must be property sized to supply average Peak day domestic demand, in addition to fire now demand at a flowrate approved by the appropriale fire control district serving the project area. E. Public Service Commission Territories: Prior to approval of the construction documents by the County, the Developer must present verification that the Florida Public Service, Commission has granted territorial rights to the Developer to provide sewer and/or water service to the Project UM the County can provide these services through is water and sewer facilities. 5.7 TRAFFIC A. Improvements to The Lord's Way shall be detailed at the Site Development Plan stage. Paving and drainage requirements will be as required by Appendix B of the Collier County Land Development Code for 19 a collector street within a sixty (61)) foot right-cf -way. Improvements to the C.R_ 951 Canal crossing may be required during permitting with the Big Cypress Basin and shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Big Cypress Basin Board. At a minimum, the roadway crossing shag be upgraded to at least 36 feet of pavement to accommodate two way traffic as well as a left turn lane. Guardrails shall be provided 'd the culvert end walls are coincident with the edge of the shoulders. The actual design shall be reviewed by the Collier County Transportation Services Department prior to final approval. B. The Developer shall provide a right hum lane and a left turn lane at the The Lord's Way /CR -951 intersection prior to the issuance of any Certificates of occupancy. Ordinance 93-64 (Section IIIAt.b.(1) sets forth the requirements for this left turn lane. C. The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the CR -951 access location when deemed warranted by the County. Prior to making this determination, the petitioner shag provide a traffic signal warrant analysis prepared by a Professional Engineer familiar with the warrant analysis procedure. Such study shah be signed and sealed by the professional engineer preparing it. This Department reserves the right to review and advise the Board of County Commissioners as to whether or not any such signal is warranted. The signal win be owned, operated. and maintained by Collier County. D. The Developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at the project access points onto The Lords Way and at The Lords Way's access onto C.R. 951 prior to the issuance of any Certificates of occupancy. E. Road impact fees shall be as provided in the schedule contained in Division 4.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code, as may be amended, and shall be paid at the time building pemuits are issued unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). F. Access Improvernents shall not be subject to impact fee credits. and excluding traffic signals, shall be in place prior to the Issuance of gory certificates of occupancy. A full median opening at the intersection of C.R. 951 and The Lords Way is consistent with the location criteria of the Countys Access Management Policy. However, there shall be no right vested in this development toward the preservation of that median opening. Any such median opening should be the subject of an application for a Work Within The Right -of -Way Permit and shall meet all of the requirements of the Access Management Plan. The County 20 reserves the right to modify any median opening if, in the County's opinion, an operational or safety hazard becomes evident G. AN traffic control devices, excluding street name signs, shag conform with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 5.6 PLANNING A. Pursuant to Section 2225.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact Is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shag be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. B. AM buildinm signage. larKlscaping and visible architecture infrastructure shall have a similar architectural theme and be aesthetically unified. Said similar architectural theme shall include: a similar architectural design and use of similar materials and colors throughout ail of the buildings, signs, and walls to be erected on the site. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the site. A conceptual design master plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for Site Development Plan approval demonstrating compliance with these standards. C. The care unit facility may be eligible for impact fee waivers or deferrals with approval of the Board of Collier County Commissioners. D. The church OF school shall be made available to the Supervisor of Elections for a poll site. E. Residential density shall apply only to development tracts being developed as residential and not to tracts developed for non - residential purposes, per Section 2.2.20.3.1 of the Land Development Code. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL A. This PUD shall be in compliance with the Copier County Land Development Code and the Growth Management Plan Conservation and Coastal Management Element in effect at the time of final development order approval. B. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis in the conservation/preservation areas, 21 shall be submitted to Current Planning Emrironmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. C. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Emmomnental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation alone, shall not be the sole component of mitigation for impacts to COMM County jurisdictional wetlands. D. Buffers shag be provided around wetlands, where possible, extending at least fifteen (15) feet landward from the edge of wetland preserves in all Places and averaging twenty -five (25) feet from the landward edge of wetlands. Where natural buffers are not possible, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Permit rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Staff. E. Petitioner shall minimize the effects of the tower on wildlife in conformance with FAA regulations. �4. a � i b Ell Dal �I e% zx 0 H TRACT "D "< ---------------- �> ti a b i ygyt Y YdtBlp� YID N Ix 6� _ 1 �wr my D d r H � H Fit �; I th 3 6� _ 1 �wr my D d r H � H Fit �; I th EXHIBIT 'C' 35' ROADWAY. AREA SEWER TYPICAL INTERNAL ROAD SEC -nON FOR TTRVC LOTS N.T.S. Dote: September 15, 1996 Keene, Engineering 240 Aviation Drive Norih Noples, rlorido 34104 (941) 403 -0123 STATE OF FLORIDA) - COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE No. 99 -59 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the lath day of September, 1999, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 16th day of September, 1999. �A �d�tX3 DWIGHT %- BROCK Clerk of Courts and Ex-of ficio to Board of�� County Commissioners By: Ellie Hoffman, - Deputy Clerk = m v T 3 r _ Off' N Dm v 2 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER A , 1) ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NO- f0145 Pew 0&95 Exhibit V.C.7 SFWJVW Permit Conditions 11- 01521 -P DATE ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 RMITTEE: FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD (FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES -PHASE I) 213 SHADOWLAWN DRIVE, NAPLES . FL 34112 OJECT DESCRIPTION: A )JECT LOCATION: COLLIER COUNTY , SECTION; 14 TWP: 505 RGE: 26E Permit is iesved purauant to 9w APp2ieaeion ab. 970]034 th Plorida Hater Rana dated March 3, 1997- Persittee agree* to 9e*sat Mstric[ and its successozn bald and a." arses by rta-w of the harmless frvn any and ell damages, claims eonetruction, operation, maintenance or use of act M raft. 3tis which eeued under the provisions of Chapter 373 paK IV ivi ti es au[horirad Plerida 9tatutes(P.9 by thi• Perait. This erring latim Under Pitt o. Chapter 37] P.9. /, and the Operati between South Plorida Nac*r ng Agreement Concerning the r°nmen [m2 pxatectiw. Issuance of this Manegemen[ Dintri ct and pblic cvnetitutes c*rtif3utiw oC compliant* WS r Department of ' }`r.'ceseaty par -saint to Section 401, th *sere toter yuali[y e public Lae 93 -SDD, 13 o8C Bectiw 1341 , unless thin permit tamdarde impmvenmt provisions of 9ubneccjons 373,41411 )(b), P B or la issued pursuant as otharvi sa *rated hem n, aod4t -4. be transferred 'a d pursuant to the j.tr`oPria[c pmvleime of Lhapter 17], P,S, and Sections 40II -1- 6107(1) and and 4DII- 4.]51(1),(3),and 141, Plerida AdminSstrative Coda Permit nay be rewked, eU.pended' or ections 4o modified at any time Pursuant to the appropriate and (4), P.A_C. Pr°visiom of chapter 373, P.S. Pereut -ball be eubjact to the Canar-al Conditiws sat forth in Rule 408- 4.3a1,P A C unl ere wired Ming Roard. The Application, and the surface Water Nananagement Staff Raviev Sumnn [nom, and "I °r modified by Plana and epecifiotions incorporated rY of the Applicatiw, inclu" all (e permit shall be is leas by reference, arm a pare of thin Pormie_ All aKivi P n[rd as set forth in the rims autkcrirsd oorated in the Surfece Na teY Nan Plane , specifications, and perfvraanes agem t staff Review Summa criteria as set forth and Yed activity, the Parente. -hall t.t Within 3D days after etf on o rsiowl submit a written stab f oonetruetion of the an93neer or other avmt of completion and °, V_Ariate individual. a offieation by a rrgietsand ads 4OR- 4.361.and 40H- 1.JH1, P_A.0. Pursuant [o the meet -Pr1i LS provi er'onn of thaptar 373 , F.S., ar]!i event the property ie eold or oLh."iee conveyed, the permittse will remain liable for c tzarefer in approved by tho District Purnuant co Rule 4DH_ oeP With this permit if anee 1.6107. 'All [AL AND GENERAL COIIDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: SEE PAGES 2 -4 OF 7 - 21 SPECIAL CONDITIONS. SEE PAGES 5 7 OF 7 - 19 GENERAL CONDITIONS- WITH THE CLERK OF THE SOUTH UTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SO DISTR Original signed by: Vern Kaiser ICT BY ITS, GOVERNING BOARD Qr4mi i sigllea by By TONY BURNS PAGE 1 OF 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS MINIMUM BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION. BASIN: BASIN A BASIN: BASIN B MINIMUM ROAD CROWN ELEVATION DISCHARGE FACILITIES: BASIN: BASIN A: PERMIT No. 11- 01521 -P PAGE 2 OF 7 - 12.00 FEET NNGGVD, BASIN: BASIN A - 12.08 FEET NGVD. BASIN: BASIN B - 11.70 FEET NGVD. 1_125WIWEXS11.85' H ECTANEGULARINNOOTCH WITH INVERT AT ELEV. 9D ' NGVD_ 66 LF OF 2.5' DIA. RCP CULVERT. RECEIVING BODY : HENDERSON CREEK CANAL CONTROL ELEV : 9.4 FEET NGVD, BASIN: BASIN B- I-I' WIES8E GWOTITAIE NGVD 1- 25WX.5' CRESTED RECTANGULAR NOTCH WHNVRT AT E EV.9.7; NGVD. RECEIVING BODY : WETLAND PRESERVE VIA SPREADER SWALE +ITROL ELEV : 9.7 FEET NGVD. THE SHOALING OREWAT RL(NALITYSPROBLEMS THE THE CONSTRUCCTTIORN*OR OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION AND/OR TURBIDITY PROBLEMS ARE NOT CREATED IN THE RECEIVING WATER. THE IHRBSNPAT0O DRAINAGE ADDITIONAL TTREATMENTMETOD SEICORORATEDINTTHE SYST IF SUCH MEASURES ARE SHOWN TO BE NECESSARY. LAKE SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 4 :1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) TO A NURTUREED ROPLLANTEDEFROMT2EFEETgELOWLTOAIIFOOT ABOVESCONTROLLELEVATION TO INSURE VEGETATIVE GROWTH_ FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE STATED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED MODIFICATION OF THIS PERMIT. SURFACE TOTTRANSFSFEREOF TITLE FORSANYYLPORTION OFSTHESPROJECT TO A THIRD PARTY. MODIFICATION OF THE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. SILT UTILIZEDEDURINGACONS TRfUC TION7HETHEUSELECTEDESEDIMV'�R C R�R�ASURES SHALL BE BE INSTALLED AREAS SHALLHBEUSTAABBIILIIZEDEAND VEGETATTEDDIMMEDiAZELY7A�ER 'RUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION INTO THE WETLANDS AND UPLAND BUFFER ZONES. 12 3. 1. lnt PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MITIGATION WORK. INCLUDING THE MONITORI TU WEDFOVERHTO THETOFERATIO�NEEY WT ACCOMPLISHED AS PERMITTED AND SFWMD ST ES. HAVE ;O AT TTHE INTERSECTION 3E MAINTAINED IN BE TAKEN BY THE ATION CORPORATED OR NG AND MAINTENANCE OF THE OF ITIGATION IL THE MITI�GATI�ON(SWO) RYS,HISL NOT BE AFF HAS CONCURRED. (}F ACTIVITIES ONITORING AND MAINTENANCE SHALL IMPLEMENTATION LBE IN ACCORDANCE CCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING WORK APPROVAL. SUCHDRETESTS MUST BE BEEMADEIIN WRRITINGSANDLSHALLLIINCLUDD FORMAL 1) REASON FOR THE MODIIFICATION. (2) PROPOSED START/FINISH DATES: AND (3) PROGRESS REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE EXISTING MITIGATION EFFORTS, COMPLETION DATE ACTIVITY APRIL 1, 1998 BASELINE MONITORING REPORT RZ,IERr1, 1998 VEGETATION L. ,ER 1. 1998 RECORD CONSERVATION EASEMENT DOCUMENTS OCTOBER 1, 1998 11. L 1999 PR -1 4RIOLE1,1200099 OCTOBER 1 2000 APRIL 1. 2001 OCTOBER 1. 2001 APRIL 1. 2002 OCTOBER 1 2002 APRIL 1. '1003 nU LAILK THAN OCTOBER 1 1998 THE PERMITTEE SHALL RECORD A CONSERVATION EASEMENT(S) OVER THE RFAI PRn6PDrV MCTMIAT n ♦r THE EASEMENT. THE CONSERYATIiEE BONASMENTSMALL E GR USING THE APPROVED FORM ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT (S) 11A - MODIFICATIONS TO THE APPROVED FORM MUST RECEIVE PRIOR ROM THE DISTRICT. UPON RFf opnaruw Tur, nrnuTr ,, X.. THE DISTRICT SERVICE-CENTER ~ � WHERETHEAPPLICATION DELINEATION OF THE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND /OR OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCORPORATED INTO THIS PERMIT. SHALL BE CONSIDERED BINDING. GENERAL CONDITIONS s''1 ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS SET FORTH 'PERMIT. ANY DEVIATION FROM CC ACTIVITY AND �'�P�ITIONS FOR UNDERTAKING THAT ACTIVITY SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THIS PERMIT AND PART IV, CHAPTER 373. F.S. A1,11VIIRN APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER WHICH ODES NOT CAUSE VIOLATIONS OF STATE WATER pp��ALITY STANDARDS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL TO PREVENT VIOLATION OF STATE WATER rlMl TTV fTAAlndnnr :_ olnniuctu AND VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL�PRACTTICESAND I ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED IN IF THE FLORIDA LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL, A GUIDE TO SOUND LAND AND EMENT (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONPfENTAL REGULATION 1988) D BY REFERENCE IN RULE 40E- 4.491, F.A.C. UNLESS A PROJET- OSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL pLApJ IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE EREAFTER THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF S. THE PERMITTEE SHALL CORRECT ANY EROSION OR SHOALING 71IAT RSE IMPACTS TO THE WATER RFCntiarrc STARTEDATE WITHIN 30NDAYS OFHTHEIDATETTHAAT THIS PERRMITAIS ISSUED. ATONLEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ACTIVITY AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT, THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL SUBMIT NOTIDISTRICT t�RM NO. 0960 INDICATING THE ACTUAL START DATE AND THE EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE. WHEN THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED ONE YEAR. THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION STATUS REPORTS TO THE DISTRICT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS UTILIZING AN ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FORM. STATUS REPORT FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING JUNE OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYC AFTFa Mum . T..., TION r ITEN BY AREGISTEREDWPROFESS SOURCE PERMITUCONSSTRUCCTIONLCOMPLLEETI( 1.0881. THE STATEMENT OF COMPLETION SITE OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION 0 RPOSE OF DETERMINING IF THE WORK W RMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. E DISTRICT THAT THE SYSTEM IS READ 'ATION FROM THE APPROVED DRAWINGS R REVIIEWEOFIASBUILTr AS COMPLETED IN COME THIS INSPECTION p ARE DISCOVERED DURI ACTIVITY. IER APPROPRIATE VIRONMENTAL FICATION FORM HALL BE BASED ON AWINGS FOR THE tKVt 10 NOTIFY TIONALLY, IF THE CERTIFICATION OF THE APPROVED CLEARLYAND LABELED AS W ELEVATIONS SHALL JtCiIONS 9.0 AND 1D. PERMIT APPLICATIONS __ AUGUST 1995_ PRT(W IFS, FINAL OPE' R,XTI'O VAND ICT WHEN MAINTENANCE AND WILL RESULTT IN NT H EPERMITTEE REMAINING LI" JHtOR CARPI AND OPERATION OF THE PERMITTED SYSTEM AND ANY OTHER PEI SHOULD ANY OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THE PERMITTED SYSTEM, THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT IN WRITING OF THE CHANGES PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION SO THAT A DETERMINATION CAN BE MADE WHETHER A PERMIT MODIFICATION IS REQUIRED, THIS PERMIT DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY TO OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT AUTHORIZATIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY "TIVITY APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONVEY TO THE PROPERTY, NOREDOESTIT AAUTIORIZE ANY ENTRANCE UPON OROACTIVITIESRONT IN WILL TO AND E PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE PERMITTEE. OR CONVEY ANY RI6TffS OR PRIVILEGES 'OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND CHAPTER '1E -4-OR CHAPTER 40E -40, F.A.C. i ST ORM E- THE PERMITTEE MUST OBTAIN A WATER USE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING, UNLESS THE WORK QUALIFIES FOR A GENERAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 40E- 20.302(4), F.A.C., ALSO KNOWN AS THE "NO NOTICE" RULE. THE PERMITTEE SHALL HOLD AND SAVE THE DISTRICT HARNESS FROM ANY AND ALL CONSTRUCTION, ALTEERRATIOONNILOPERATION. MAINTENANCE, REMOVAL,OABAANNDONMENT OR USE OF ANY SYSTEM AUTHORIZED BY THE PERMIT. 30 DAYS LOFA ALL HAY OR PROPER IDENTIFICATION ESHAALLyHAVEPERMISSIONSTOIENTERR, INSPECTS SAMPLE AND TEST THE SYSTEM TO INSURE CONFORMITY WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED BY THE PERMIT. IF HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS ARE DISCOVERED AT ANY TIME ON THE PROJECT SITE. THE PERMITTEE SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT SERVICE CENTER. PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTEDINFOORMATIONNTTHATYISHLATER DISCOVEREDITONBEOINACCCURATE_ +-+v vaaa a- .>•.va. ate... ur, KLVl 1♦ 1c6J11a�l.iita.tl 1. L1J C11Ll 33D1 Gun Club Road, lVest Patin Beach, Florida 33406 _W (561) 686 8800 • FI WAYS 1 -80D 432 -2045 TDD (561) 697 -2574 CON24 -06 August 25, 1997 1tdrblOfG 23S d Naples, FL 34112 Subject; Application No. 970303 -4, First Assembly Ministries -Phase 1, Copier County, S I4/ T50S/R26E Enclosed is a copy of this District's staff' report covering the permit application referenced therein. It is equested that you read this staff report thoroughly and understand its contents_ The recommendations is stated in the staff report will be presented to our Governing Board for consideration on September 11, 1997. Should you wish to object to the staff recommendation or file a petition, please provide written objections Petitions and/or waivers (refer to the attached "Notice of Rights ") to; Vern Kaiser, Deputy Clerk South Florida Water Management District Post Office Box 24680 West Pahn Beach, Florida 334I64680 The 'Notice of Rights" addresses the procedures to be fbEowed if you desire a public hearing or other review Proposed agency action. You are advised, however, to be prepared to defend your position regarding lic with ptthesttart recommendation, m when it is considered by the Governing Board for final agency action, even if you agree from the mmncya ctio as the Governing Board may take final agency action which ddfers materially Proposed agency action. Please contact the District if you have any qquestions concerning this matter. If we do not bear from you prior to the date on the "Notice ofRights ", we wlll assume you concur with our recommendations. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a 'Notice of Rights" has been mailed to the addressee this August 1997, in accordance with Section 120.60 (3), Florida Statutes, Sincerely, enneth G. Ammon, P.E. Deputy Director Regulation Department CERTIFIED #; Z 308 998 180 3ETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 25th day of ria� ..onnL Vlriniamr+n,Iu. Clr-vi mran e K_ Prttis, Vic, Chaimtan Vc a M. Cartct Richard A. N1whek Samuel E. Poole M, Execvrioe Dirretor .11 4V HrrKcr :Yilliam E. Crah:mi Michael D. Minton Michad Slayton, Dep,ry Exeruti,, Direrror William Hammond Klini Singm, IvIdding Addncm P.O. Rix 2463%, Wc,r Hdtn Brach, FL 33416 -4686 -. hns.swo d NOTICE OF RIGHTS Enclosed is a coP1r of the Staff Review Summary regarding the subject permit application, which Is this agency's Notice of Proposed Agency Action. PETITION FOR FOR MAI ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS - Any person whose substantial interests are or may be affected by the action which is proposed in the enclosed Notice of Propoied Agency Action /Staff Review Summary, may petition for an administrative hearing in accordance with the requirements of Rule 40E- 1.521, Florida Administrative Code, and be filed with (received by) the District Clerk, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406. Petitions for administrative hearing on the above application m ust be filed within fourteen (14) days of actual receipt of this Notice of Proposed Agency Action. Failure to fife a petition within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any rights such person. may have to request an administrative determination(hearing) under section 120.57, Florida Statutes, concerning.the subject permit application. Petitions which are not filed in accordance with. the above provisions are subject to dismissal. party to the proceeding bel application before the Land ow may seek review of a Final Order rendered on the permit and Water Adjudicatory Commission. Review under section 373.114, Florida Statutes, is initiated by filing a request for review with the Land and °_diudicatoryCommission and serving a copy on the Department of Environmental Protection a ny person named in the Order within applicable statutory timeframes. This review is appellate in nature and limited to the record below. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL A party who is adversely affected by final agency action on the permit application is entitled to judicial review in the District Court of Appeal pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, as provided therein. Review under section 120.68, Florida Statutes, is initiated by filing a Notice of Appeal in the appropriate District Court of Appeal in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 4.110. CIRCutrCOURT Section 373.617(2), Florida Statutes, provides: Any person substantially a ffected by a final action of any agency with respect to a permit may seek review within 90 days of the rendering of such decision and request monetary damages and other relief in the circuit court in the judicial circuit in which the affected Property is located; hoVvever, circuit court review shall be confined solely to determining whether final agency action is an unreasonable exercise of Ahe state's police power constituting a taking with just compensation. Review of final agency action for the Purpose of determining whether the action is in accordance with existing statutes or rules and based on competent substantial evidence shall proceed in accordance with Chapter 120. term 03001we 2 0.ev.7r43 - ,JE -1.521 Initiation of Formal Proceedings (1) initiation of formal proceedings shall be made by filing a petition with the District Cle.k within the applicable timef tames set forth in this chapter. The term petition includes any application or other document which expresses a request for formal proceedings. (2) Ail petitions filed under these rules "I (a) The name and address of the District and the D- istric[ s file or identification number, if known, (b) The name and address ofthe petitioner or petitioners; (C) An explanation of how each petitioners substantial interests will be affected by the District's determination; (d) A statement of when and how petitioner received notice of agency action or notice of proposed agency action; (e) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (f) A concise statement of the ultimate facts which petitioner believes entitle petitioner to the relief sought as well asthe rules and statutes which support petitioner's claim for relief; (g) A demand for the relief to which the petitioner deems himself entitled; and (h) Other information which the petitioner contends is inateriat. (3) Upon receipt of a petition for formal proceedings, the Office of Counsel shall review the petition for compliance with subsection (2). The Board shall accept those petitions in substantial compliance therewith. which have been timely filed, which establish that the petitioner is a substantially affected party, and which state a dispute which is within the jurisdiction of the District io resolve. If accepted, the Board shall designate the.piesiding officer of the administrative hearing - The District shalt promptly give written notice to all parties of the action takers on the petition, and shall state with particularity its reasons therefor. (7) if the Board designates a Hearing Off icer assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings as the presiding officer, the District clerk shall forward the petition and all relevant materials filed with the Oistrict to the Division of Administrative Hearings. and shall notify all parties of its action. Specific Authority 373 .044.373.113 F.S. Law Implemented 120.S3(1).120.57 F.S. History - -- New 9 -3 -81, Amended 5- 11.93. Formerly 16K- 1.09(l),16K- 1.112(1) through (3),16K-1.12 P LOCATION MAP Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FL Latitude 26 °07'10" N, Longitude 81 °41604" W FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS �I • a ,; pe i i 1 1 1 � 1 � �� ��• LOCATION MAP Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FL Latitude 26 °07'10" N, Longitude 81 °41604" W FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS m N � n 0 H O0 000, O N O W ON 1 3 p m y � r v n FZ UU t U <Iumi t R SK m N � n 0 H O0 000, O N O W ON 1 3 p m y � r v n FZ UU t U <Iumi J d CK) UUU DUO U U r « «« < O -.- aZ a a..o v.r.� q.. m n > w a Z�1- �1N •NO O O � A6 O U) mZ) 3 3 35 3 m =G GX o IN F {_ m N � n 0 H O0 000, O N O W ON 1 3 p m y � r v n v v N N �v v OONN c�vvm rrmm UU t U <Iumi O CK) 1!J 0 10 O O C sy n > in a H o. 3 m =G w Q n JW d NZ <Z J d Mcd cco F WWZ rN '� cow � W cn ZZ�mZZZZ tam � rn a U 0 U ww �=)J OOfAN !/7 qN a WWW 1 ww-C JJJ Z f SLCWW <2{�.. U3 U EdC.3W ZEd F 3K in ===(LUUr,C,. i um ul o> r� r (L v v N N �v v OONN c�vvm rrmm `s a 0 W W Q w q O O H 0 �: p N � kn U ON o .o 0 a 0 x w Z a Y aJ J i Y Z i n C C ip N ti 4 G ca u N Q V U U L U U u LL. M c v Q 0 Q U .--• O N N O V O rt o. n u kn .T' p cn a. 0 H U n. RI y a t4 0 a 0 x w Z a Y aJ J i Y Z i n C C ip N ti N G ca u M N V U U L U U u LL. M c v w v v 0 N C. � .--• O � N O V O rt o. u kn 0 a 0 x w Z a Y aJ J i Y Z i n C C ip N ti N G ca u M N u LL. M c v w v v uc3 W rtr ¢ 5 u 0 a 0 x w Z a Y aJ J i Y Z i n C Y 3 W FY \_l U) 0 TW y3! CI t�l i 1 1 a }6 N` {i fit, c r s pWp U Y J . O s o n� m v a Y J � J T Z FW \ "3 o z ai Ni u = F w uc�c. 1. Cl <r J� QI: J J L:I =1 �I F-, c� ,- LT. 00 O r UW cn _ c cn Ch L �V C) it `J_- J V NO. WI 0 Z ry Y 3 W FY \_l U) 0 TW y3! CI t�l i 1 1 a }6 N` {i fit, c r s pWp U Y J . O s o n� m v a Y J � J T Z FW \ "3 o z ai Ni u = F w uc�c. 1. Cl <r J� QI: J J L:I =1 �I F-, Noturcl Area W:: ^:r SS'iM Salter. 1 T NOTE: CONTROL STRUC UR_ SNALE DE. FOOT TYPE -E, wLrT w/ TWO. v.S.r. /52:C ORATES (OR EGUAL) CONTROL STRUCTURE Wl DE—All- ms. BASIN A Contrcl St-;cure Grote EL = 11.4-\ 24- CUP aReriL \ I 1-1 m� H! 199605090 (U44B)SP SQ MARCH 25, 1998 FIRST ASSEM. OF GOD SHEET 6 OFX IS Proposed 50 L.F. Spreader Swale 2' (,Y --:"AL' r 3- NOTCH S IM' 9-7 ',,t2- 'WEIR O 'NV - '0.55 �sy :`ae- S Area �> SFVM System W Amirye - Y t Ri ra^ sumo —/ R'�- -op sum --� P— r Btm el = B.7`� Btm el B.5 N07E: CON iRO_ <.,JCTL)RE SHAG BE FDO7 TYPE 'C' W/ USr ;RATE NOTE: PERTUCER EERV AT Y,':RTJU ELEvw>rOH 111e :ETC ^m5 IT El -'- Or CONTRO; SSRJ-- ..lRE. CCNTROL S,EjCT�:4E #2 SECT!ON BASIN B s vl �- .wrr H !— im. s vl �- .wrr H !— G � +J H L :3 j• H it > : >p 0 I W H !— QL O H C7 > : >p I > m 00 O �• Y m Y I Y W LT� OV1 N � O m x m ° e m4 ox¢� U > U C ++ L Z W U U a L Y ✓ G C C m o m 0 0 U �/� 4 u C C C y m m q q q✓ n m L t L n LAJ I-" L q N •Y ii N �/ � a= ITW Z 3 0 .+ w O 1D 10 N r 0 F o l T. o.� o O o m +L'° N.a y lZ O N O 4 � w _J a cm V) U V a o �o .. Q a M mm w H W n X N O - n n, n y U aniv n ++ >>v v•, c 1� m m m 0 m c mJ .+cma w° y w a 3 \ \ .-r A r- W 3 N a F 3 � IS* Ilk s :o IWI Lb .90 Am L try/ CQ OA � C7 -i ppO�. O� �A Q w x I I _tn W in I M L U- N Q W O J M a. W r in in a Q a. in O N 0 vJ W � .-r A r- W 3 N a F 3 � IS* Ilk s :o IWI Lb .90 Am L try/ CQ OA � C7 -i ppO�. O� �A Q w x I I _tn W in I M L U- N Q W O J M a. W r in in a Q a. in O N 0 ro p 0 0 �= U� rUl I _ a m �r F� e 0 r S ~ 6 ea Nee O O M Z �. 0 OD 0, C) CN O U kn rn�w �w V) LLJ V) c_Z L n � N C) W O N J QJ (- LLI fn v V) Q � f— W V) O x Q N _ a FILT- a v a> O U E~ W Z CD C14 coo 0% CIO 1 A Z n � w > Q. W a a W w d W V aiZ oz , uaiEO» Ell Z � ao 'I z w E3w � > z Ccl r ;w J wri n c7 zo n t U3 F A > E-2 C7 �Z + U �C� W Z U 7 - W mA > as �z s _ a..r L � m pr„ 11 O W = E• U c C� � 6 . W J 1 w i W n z E- ra Br- z J J iz. A z 3 F w F W _Z A z " o z F F < z > I < a. U X � W O iz z 0 F U W W W x n W m U d 6 W w w J d z_ E¢� w Q W CO W H w w m t m z 0 F U W W m CL I I � I c7 n � > E-2 C7 z i` _ is Zi t -. + � W A d t>r c� n � c� z z F i� r, m W 4S W � d ca ZW �o yE- L) W �cn J in m fn wir° U U d �7 FO W U � d W i+- O ca q z t ° ° °. r da. da I s 0. z° o� wQ z O N W z 0 N U o o N w d w a w F z_ z x d C. z A W I � A U zd ox Hz U W W Cn A �z of- job Do z C F U W co W W 0 W U aW E" U Zw Z @ A E w \ W W C5 d F X W wa Fast Assembly of Ministries USACOE Wetland Mitigation Plan — On -Site All on -site mitigation activities will be initiated within me year of permit issuance. Wetland Enhancement Selective Exotic Removal The on -site mitigation plan includes 4.1 acres of wetland enhancement through selective exotic removaL Exotic and nuisance vegetation would be selectively removed with an approved herbicide. No mechanical clearing will occur in this area. The goal of the mitigation work is to achieve and maintain less than 5% coverage with exotic and nuisance species. Wetland Enhancement Mechanical Clearing and Replanting The on -site mitigation plan includes the enhancement of 7.6 acres of wetlands through mechanical removal of the exotics. During clearing this area will be regraded to elevations from 9.7'NGVD to 9.4" NGVD. The area will then be planted with a mix of pine and cypress trees. Trees will be clustered to mimic natural conditions. The tree densities will be 109 trees per acre. The goal of the mitigation work will be to achieve a density of 109 trees per acre with a coverage by exotics and nuisance species at less than 5 %. FPL Wetlands The on -site mitigation plan includes 4.0 acres of preserved wetland located within the FPL easement. Approximately 50' of the west side of the easement contains melaleuca, the remainder is cleared lands. Exotic and nuisance vegetation would be initially removed mechanically. The goal of the mitigation work is to achieve and maintain less than 5% coverage with exotic and nuisance species. Upland Enhancement The on -site mitigation plan includes 0.6 acres of upland preserve. Exotic and nuisance vegetation will be selectively removed The goal of the mitigation work is to achieve and maintain less than 5% coverage with exotic and nuisance species. Enhanced Lake Littoral Zone The on -site mitigation plan includes 0.6 acres of lake littoral plantings that interface with the 7.6 acre wetland enhancement area. The shelf will be contoured to provide deeper areas for wading bird forage areas. This littoral zone will be approximately 38' wide. The goal of the mitigation effort is to achieve and 80 percent areal coverage with native non - nuisance aquatic species. Monitoring reports will be provided on an annual basis for a minimum of 5 years or until the mitigation success criteria has been met. Mitigation areas west of FPL, K4bacres, will be placed under a Conservation Easement and will be dedicated to SFWMD (see attached Preserved Wetland / Upland Map). 199605090 (fgaB) If-Sb MARCH 25, 1999 FIRST ASSEM. OF GOD SHEET 12 OF= 19 First Assembly of Ministries Monitoring Plan - On -site Monitoring will be conducted for a minimum of five years or until the success criteria are met and will include the following parameters: • Panoramic Photographs • Description of Vegetation Composition and Percent Coverage • Percent cover with Nuisance Species • Percent Cover with Exotic Species • Summary of Wildlife Utilization • Monthly Water Level Monitoring in the Dry Season • Bi- Weekly Water level Monitoring in the Wet Season For details regarding locations of transects, photo points, and staff gauge see Monitoring Map graphic. The maintenance plan will be implemented in the enbanced/restored wetlands and upland preserve areas on a regular basis (semi annual for the first two years and annual thereafter in perpetuity) to ensure the integrity and viability of the wetland and upland preserve areas. Exotic and nuisance vegetation will be those species currently identified by the Florida Exotic and Nuisance Pest Plant Councils current list of most invasive plant species and incorporated by reference. Monitoring Schedule Baseline monitoring report Prior to construction / exotic removal Time zero monitoring report Within 30 days of mitigation activities (planting) Monitoring will occur on an annual basis thereafter until the success criteria are met. 1 99605090 (I ) -TP 56 MARCH 25, 1998 FIRST ASSEM. OF GOD SHEET 13 OF= !8 p YYY a yN a N �w y z �U as �. C g w U m w 0 N w a U e d i N ... < z Owl �u zu !D a Q Z 0 Q w p c7 00 p rn cz, o C-4 5 < r 8 r N _W F- N _Z M O LA- IL J Qi = O W N V) ~ Q = W O !n i N - o c� z v z W O O F- d CD 4 F- � LL LL z z a N 0 z O 2 N LJ LS M N z _Z Q' Q �- O F- O N 2 IL U) LLJ i' F- U) Z :2 j LL_ w 00 L) d .J v m d d LLJ _Z Q 0 0 F Z !l 0 r � O W H Q U O W in W m O Z a� Q0 LL) N tn J4 W W W 30 En > Q oW- Z W 5Z ao � U ,o :rnW� O N CS x F ON L LLI �- a V) a Z O Z Q J LL- a O �g m W La3 V) (n W Ix Q Ix W F- N Lki V) W- o' iL I.L. Resident Restrictions 1) Signage will be place around the preserve areas and lakes. This sigaage (language) will prohibit hand- feeding of wildlife, including birds. This will eliminate leftover food scraps throughout the property. There will be at least five steel signs which will state °Feeding of Animals 'is Prohibited." 2) There will be no birdfeeders, or other type of mechanical feeder located on site. 3) There will be no beehives, gardens, livestock (including fowl), or stables meant to house animals located on site. 4) If picnic areas are located on -site, signage will be placed in the vicinity reminding People to remove all food scraps and refuse when Ieaving. ,lilrvsical Barriers All garbage temporarily stored outside, until being hauled away, will be kept in hear- prvof dumpsters as depicted on the attached graphic- In addition, all dumpsters will be enclosed on four sides by a wooden or concrete suucaue (there will be no roof on this structure). These beanpmof dumpsters will either be purchased from known suppliers or will be built out of standard dumpsters and modified (welded) according the specifications shown on the attached graphic- All dumpsters will be washed out a minimum of once per week There will be no garbage cans (those typically used for single family residence) storing garbage outside of a building. Garbage cans of this style will be used exclusively indoors and meant for transporting to the bear proof dumpsters. Garbage will be hauled away at least two times per week 199605090 (H%W),rp_St3 MARCH 25, 1998 FIRST ASSEM. OF GOD Ciri �T i �r� I � / Q W W O U U ..2 J O O W a E, o U) � H Q � W En Z: AU p� z to � za W n4 B ul W r•+ a' ul lT_ V z o 00 0 f .: ma ul 0 a E. 4 U) " a, O Gi F tn a� • OZ ;_log � C% W G w z a, w I � / Q W W O U U ..2 J O O W a E, o U) � H Q � W En Z: AU p� z to � za W n4 B ul W r•+ a' ul z o ma ul 0 a E. 4 U) " a, O Gi F 00 a� OZ ;_log G w 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God PERMIT ND: 41 41521 -P PAGE 2. OF 7 r SPECIAL CONDITIONS t. MINIMUM BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION: BASIN: BASIN A 12.70 FEET NGVD. BASIN: BASIN B 12.00 FEET NM' 2, MINIMUM ROAD CROWN ELEVATION: BASIN: BASIN A - 12.08 FEET NGVD. BASIN: BASIN B - 11.70 FEET NGVD,- 3. DISCHARGE FACILITIES: BASIN: BASIN A: 1 -.26' WEXSI 85' CHERECTANGULARINOTCCHH�WITHTINVERT AT ELEV. 9 4' NGVD. 86 LF OF 2.5' DIA. RCP CULVERT. 4 RECEIVING BODY : HENDERSON CREEK CANAL CONTROL ELEV : 9.4 FEET NGVD. BASIN: BASIN R: 1- .25WIWEX.8 SHARP HRRECTANGGUULARWNOTCHRWITHpINVERT ATOELLEEEV.N9 7' NGVD. RECEIVING BODY WETLAND PRESERVE VIA SPREADER SWALE CONTROL ELEV : 9.7 FEET NGVD. ON OF ANY EROSION, THE CONSTRUCTION OR 5. MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION AND /OR TURBIDITY PROBLEMS ARE NOT CREATED IN THE RECEIVING WATER. S. THE DISTRICT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THAT ADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT METHODS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IF SUCH MEASURES ARE SHOWN TO BE NECESSARY. �. LAKE SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 4 :1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) TO A DEPTH D R L BELOW THE CONTROL SIDE SLOPES OPANTEDRROM FEET OOOT ABOENTRO SHALL TO INSURE VEGETATIVE GROWTH. !, FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE STATED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED MODIFICATION OF THIS PERMIT. �. OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF TITLE FOR ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT TO A THIRD PARTY. MODIFICATION OF THE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. L LLT SCREENS. HAY BALES OR OTHER SUCH SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE UTILIZED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE SELECTED SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL WETLANDS. ALL AREAS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION INTO THE WETLANDS AND UPLAND BUFFER ZONES. 12. 13. PERMIT NO. 11- 01521 -p PAGE 3- OF Z STATUS A INTERSECTION IE MAINTAINED IN L MEASURES TO BE TAKEN BY THE RC(�RVEDf INCORPORATED OR TO PROJECT RELATED 14. THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE MITIGATION WORK, INCLUDING THE MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MITIGATION AREAS FOR THE DURATION OF THE PLAN. THE MITIGATION AREA(S) SHALL NOT BE TURNED OVER TO THE OPERATION ENTITY UNTIL THE MITIGATION WORK IS ACCOMPLISHED AS PERMITTED AND SFWMD STAFF HAS CONCURRED. 15. A WETLAND MONITORING PROGRAM SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE PROTECTED WETLANDS TH EXHIBIT(S) DETENTION . 10A AREAS. OC AND SHALLLLIINCL DELANNUAL REPORTSISUBMITTTTED TO THE SFWMD FOR REVIEW. MONITORING SHALL CONTINUE FOR A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS, 1n. A WETLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2.6IACRES)OF MARSH THE OFTTRANSITIONALSAREA AND PROTECTF.6YACRESOF UPLAND COMPENSATION ARFA(S) 17 0 18. ACTIVITIE MONITORIN SCHEDULE. APPROVAL. REASON FO PROGRESS COMPLETION DATE APRIL 1. 1998 APRIL 1. 1998 OCTOBER 1, 1998 OCTOBER 1, 1998 ACTIVITY BASELINE MONITORING REPORT EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL PLANTING MITIGATION EASEMENT DOCUMENTS WORK SFWMD 0 21. THE DELINEATION OF THE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND /OR OTHER SURFACE WATERS. AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCORPORATED INTO THIS PERMIT, SHALL BE CONSIDERED BINDING. .' WOBER APRIL 1, 1 1998 1999 APRIL 1. 1999 OCTOBE APRIL 112000 , , OCTOBER OCTOBER 1 2001 APRIL 1. 2002 AAPRIILLE1.1100302 19, A MAINTENANCE PROGRA 21. THE DELINEATION OF THE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND /OR OTHER SURFACE WATERS. AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCORPORATED INTO THIS PERMIT, SHALL BE CONSIDERED BINDING. � � �LL✓—V :�WIY -uLSi = I a-Mi - -- Hammock MOGAN r h t i rvJ t .d1 = Opt KaCIYe L - J EWE' ... f ' y F w FS r � . x► 24 A - S n'T _ - J EWE' ... f ' y F w FS r � . 9 r ``•n'y11- F y VA• , as w :• •T'- "jam' -��= IGATTpN ' ]9 9605090 (1D -SF3) �- MARCH 25 1998 FIRST EISSEM. OF' GOD SH1iET 20 OF 21 Y» x► 24 A - S 9 r ``•n'y11- F y VA• , as w :• •T'- "jam' -��= IGATTpN ' ]9 9605090 (1D -SF3) �- MARCH 25 1998 FIRST EISSEM. OF' GOD SH1iET 20 OF 21 Y» W.mm o °< CY, U "� z F 3 U c U F � o O U 00 00OY -ON WO m w C, rna 0WV� 0 cQ et 0 U) w C3 co 4 Ham F w a dC aa'aw. Z04 nv�wZ w �zyw co �+ z add W C) d,Zm H g G A M Z p w MO U3 -C an d w W H z =o d v o H W U) d W CO .. z - � w i q U) d W i F + 3 - E-4 -+ oa H a� wo w W.mm o °< CY, U "� z Op', 3 U c U F � o O U 00 W.mm ExhibitfV.C.8 USACOE Permit Conditions DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permi.ttee: First Assembly of God 2132 Shadowlawn Drive Naples, Florida 34112 0- Permit No: 199605090(IP -SB) Issuing Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, mean the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. ` Project Description: Construct an educational and rehabilitation campus to include an adult living facility, travel trailer unit lots for multi- family dwellings, an assembly center for predominately church use, a chapel, a child care facility, a school, and a gymnasium. The project also involves improvements to an access road along the south property boundary. The project will impact 38.0 acres of jurisdictional waters by filling 31.5 acres with 155,079 cubic yards of fill and excavating 112,919 cubic yards from 6.5 acres. The work is to be completed in accordance with the attached plans numbered 199605090(IP -SB) in 18 sheets dated March 25, 1998. These drawings can be found in Attachment A, which is attached to, and becomes part of, this permit. Project Location: The project is located on a 68.8 acre parcel along the east side of County Route 951 (CR -951) approximately 0.75 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR -846) in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Latitude 26 007'10" N, Longitude 81 041'04" W 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on APR 10 2 If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature and mailing address of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it contains such conditions (Attachment B). 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. 2 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God Special Conditions: 1. The permittee shall notify the Corps in writing at least 48 hours prior to commencement of the work authorized by this permit. This commencement notification and all other reports regarding this permit shall be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, Enforcement Branch, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida 32232 -0019 and shall reference the permit number. 2. The permittee shall perform on site compensatory mitigation on 16.9 acres by enhancing 11.7 acres of wetlands, enhancing 0.6 acre of uplands, creating 0.6 acre of shorebird habitat, and removing the exotic and nuisance vegetation from 4.0 acres of FP1, Easement. The mitigation work shall be completed in accordance with the attached plans entitled "Permit Drawings" in 18 sheets dated March 25, 1998 (Attachment A) unless otherwise specifically stated in the Special Conditions of this permit. • The 11.7 acres of on site enhanced wetlands shall consist of 4.1 acres of wetland enhancement without plantings (wetland #1) and 7.6 acres of wetland enhancement with plantings (wetland #2). Wetland #1 -and 0.5 acre of enhanced uplands (upland #1) shall be located outside of the surface water management system for the project site. Wetland #2 and 0.1 acre of enhanced uplands (upland #2) shall be located within the surface water management system. Wetland 42, upland #2, and 0.6 acre of shorebird habitat shall be maintained at a control elevation of 9.7 feet NGVD (Basin B). • Wetland #1, upland #l, and upland #2 shall be cleared of exotic and nuisance vegetation by hand methods. Vehicles and other equipment which disturb the soil surface shall be prohibited. • Wetland #2 shall be cleared of exotic and nuisance vegetation and shall be regraded to an elevation between 9.4 feet and 9.7 feet NGVD, but in no case shall exceed 9.7 feet NGVD. The area shall be replanted with nursery grown 6 foot cypress and slash pine trees at an average density of 109 trees per acre. The number of trees planted for either species shall not exceed 60 percent of the total. • The 0.6 acre shorebird habitat shall be a minimum of 66 feet wide and shall be divided into three zones as shown on cross 3 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God section C -C page 11 of Attachment A. The shallow or landward side of zone A shall be graded to match the elevation of wetland #2. The area within the shorebird habitat shall be excavated to provide two, terraced shelves which would trap water during periods of low water. The bottom elevation of each shelf shall differ by no less than 0.5 feet in order to trap water at different low water periods. Zones A and B of the 0.6 acre shorebird habitat shall be planted with a minimum of 5 species of native herbaceous wetland plants. The number of plantings from any one species in zones A & B shall not exceed 30 percent of the total and at no time shall the aerial coverage by any one species exceed 30 percent aerial coverage. Zone C of the 0.6 acre shorebird habitat shall be planted with a minimum of 3 species of native herbaceous wetland plants. The number of plantings from any one species in zone C shall not exceed 40 percent of the total and at no time shall the aerial coverage by any one species exceed 40 percent aerial coverage. 3. Within one year from the date of permit issuance the permittee shall complete the mitigation work, except for ongoing monitoring and adjustments to ensure the success of the mitigation. 4. The 16.9 acre on site mitigation areas shall be managed in perpetuity for (a) the control of invasive exotic vegetation as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council's 1997 List of Invasive Species and for (b) the control of nuisance plant species as defined by the South Florida Water Management District (Appendix E, Technical Publication REG -001; Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure, WRAP; September 1997) . At no time shall the density of invasive exotic vegetation exceed 5% of the total aerial cover. At no time shall the density of nuisance plant species exceed 10% of the total aerial cover. 5. Within one year from the date of this permit, the permittee shall place a conservation easement (preserve) on 12.9 acres of the 16.9 acre on site mitigation areas. The location of the preserve areas are identified on page 16 in Attachment A. The conservation easement shall be legally sufficient to ensure that the 12.9 acre preserve shall remain in its natural state in perpetuity. The 12.S acre preserve areas will not be disturbed by any dredging, filling, land clearing, agricultural activities, planting, or any other construction work whatsoever except for those activities noted in the attached "Permit Drawings" (Attachment A) or stated specifically in this permit instrument. The permittee agrees that the only future utilization of the preserved areas in question ki 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God shall be as a purely natural area. The conservation easement for the preserve areas shall be granted to the South Florida Water Management District as noted in Attachment B (SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit No. 11- 01521 -P). The permittee shall prepare the proposed conservation easement, including a description, including scaled drawings, of the area in question and furnish the same to the Jacksonville District Office of Counsel, c/o THE REGULATORY DIVISION, ENFORCEMENT BRANCH for legal review and approval. Within 30 days of Corps approval of the proposed easement, the permittee shall record the easement in the public records of Collier County, Florida and a certified copy of the recorded document, plat and verification of acceptance from the grantee shall be forwarded to the Jacksonville District Office. 6. The permittee shall protect the on site mitigation areas which are not to be placed into a conservation easement (4.0 acres) in a similar manner as the on site mitigation areas which are to be placed into a conservation easement (Special Condition #5; 12.9 acres). The 4.0 acres of on site mitigation which is not to be placed into a conservation easement shall not be disturbed by any dredging, filling, land clearing, agricultural activities, planting, or any other construction work whatsoever except for those activities noted in the attached "Permit Drawings:" (Attachment A). 7. The permittee agrees that the monitoring of the 16.9 acre on site mitigation areas outlined in paragraph 2 above, shall consist of baseline monitoring (prior to mitigation construction), time - zero monitoring (within 30 days following completion of the mitigation work), and annual monitoring reports thereafter. All monitoring reports will be mailed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, Enforcement Branch, Post Office Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida 32232 -0019. Each monitoring report will include data collected on vegetation, wildlife, rainfall, and wetland water levels, as described on page 13 of the "Permit Drawings" (Attachment A) and must also include the following items: (a) the Department of the Army Permit number, (b) the sequence number of the report being submitted, (c) the date the next report is expected to be submitted, and (d) a brief summary of the status of the mitigation including any problems encountered and the remedial actions taken. 8. The on site mitigation shall be considered successful when the following success criteria has been met: 5 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God Wetland #1 and upland #1 and upland #2: • for five consecutive years the density of invasive exotic vegetation has, at no time, exceeded 5% of the total aerial cover and that the density of nuisance plant species has, at no time, exceeded 10% of the total aerial cover.. Wetland #2: • for five consecutive years the density of invasive exotic vegetation has, at no time, exceeded 5% of the total aerial cover and that the density of nuisance plant species has, at no time, exceeded 10% of the total aerial cover. • the area has an average density of 109 trees /acre (cypress and slash pine) greater than 6 feet in height and that these trees have survived for three consecutive years without the need for supplemental plantings. • The number of cypress trees or slash pines does not exceed 60 percent of the total. Shorebird Habitat: • for five consecutive years the density of invasive exotic vegetation has, at no time, exceeded 5% of the total aerial cover and that the density of nuisance plant species has, at no time, exceeded 10% of the total aerial cover. • zones A, B & C has a native herbaceous aerial coverage of greater than 80 percent and that these plants have survived for three consecutive years without the need for supplemental plantings. • the aerial coverage from any one species in zones A & B does not exceed 30 percent of the total aerial coverage in those zones. • the aerial coverage from any one species in zone C does not exceed 40 percent of the total aerial coverage in zone C. 6 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God FPL Easement (4.0 acres): • for five consecutive years the density of invasive exotic vegetation has, at no time, exceeded 5% of the total aerial cover and that the density of nuisance plant species has, at no time, exceeded 10% of the total aerial cover. 9. Annual monitoring shall continue for five consecutive years or until the success criteria for all on site mitigation areas has been met. A request for a final inspection should be submitted with the last monitoring report. The Corps of Engineers shall make the success determination. 10. The permittee shall implement a large mammal nuisance plan as described on pages 17 -18 in the "Permit Drawings" (Attachment A). 11. The permittee shall perform off site compensatory mitigation by donating 102 acres to the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) Trust. The location of the off site compensatory mitigation is identified in Attachment C (Off Site Mitigation Plan). Within one year from the date of this permit instrument, the permittee shall provide written documentation from CREW Trust that the transfer of ownership has been completed. Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: ( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). (X) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). ( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413). 2. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, and local authorization required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. C. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property - or rights of others. 7 199605090(IP -SB) First Assembly of God d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal projects. 3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. C. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision: This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (see 4 above). C. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. 8 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD PUD ([ ROJECC NO. 0612.22) PREPARLU BY: 1'R Transportation Consultants, hic. 13881 Plantation Road, Suite 11 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 -4339 Certificate of Authorization 427003 239 -278 -3090 July 17, 2007 �j TRANSPORTATION �� (( CONSULTANTS, INC. CONTENTS L INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION V. EXISTING PUD vs. PROPOSED PUD VI. TRIP DISTRIBIfFION VIL FUTURI? TRAFFIC CONDITIONS VIII. PROJECTED CONCURRI;NCY AND IMPROVEIMENI'S IX. CONCLUSION �j TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, [tic. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the proposed re- zoning submittal of the First Assembly of God PUD along the east side of Collier Boulevard to the north of its intersection with The Lord's Way in Collier County, Florida_ This report has been completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Collier County Transportation Planning Division for developments seeking approval for re- zoning. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1. The proposed PUD re -zone would modify the existing PUD on the subject site to allow a variety of church /worship related uses in addition to a 306 -unit multi-family dwelling unit development on the site. An in -depth discussion of the existing uses allowed on the site and the proposed uses as a part of this rc -zone will be included within this report. This report examines the impact of the dcvctopment on the surrounding roadways. Trip generation and assignments to the site access driveways will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. A methodology meeting was held with Mr. Nick Casalanguida of the Collier County Transportation Planning Department on January 8, 2007. 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, a variety of uses exist on the subject site. Specifically, a Church /Auditorium and a Church/Chapel use are constructed on the subject site. Additionally, approximately 23 camp sites exist on the subject site. An aerial photograph has been included in the Appendix of this document that indicates the intensity of the development on the subject site as of January 2007. Tahle 1 indicates the approved development under the existing zoning on the subject site in its entirety. Page I I muu -r � p PROJECT SITE .mr r r if f a ( n..i dLL y � tOW XY "Y_ nnn (SW6EXf�LXSr ALL e I Ley- E.11 Ea ESrP1f5 J r — es c z j r oam. ;rroa+, . Atikr(�(' Naples . Manor ✓ TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD / N E S N T.S _ c f Figure 1 �Gr�h 11 2 LAKES L� I „r uPes �Z a r '. i`viliucs t K I muu -r � p PROJECT SITE .mr r r if f a ( n..i dLL y � tOW XY "Y_ nnn (SW6EXf�LXSr ALL e I Ley- E.11 Ea ESrP1f5 J r — es c z j r oam. ;rroa+, . Atikr(�(' Naples . Manor ✓ TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD / N E S N T.S _ c f Figure 1 I 2 LAKES uPes + '. i`viliucs t K 14J rnm WF rnul _ a. LBIb 1. 0 ?L \I(K R.• s 2 411N PY! DF I L0.F_ �fli 4 11.Al .. IS I •. kc WEE '�I(POWN ';PoINrI v I muu -r � p PROJECT SITE .mr r r if f a ( n..i dLL y � tOW XY "Y_ nnn (SW6EXf�LXSr ALL e I Ley- E.11 Ea ESrP1f5 J r — es c z j r oam. ;rroa+, . Atikr(�(' Naples . Manor ✓ TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD / N E S N T.S _ c f Figure 1 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 'Fable I First Assembly of God 11111) Annroved Uses under Ezistine PUD Land Use Existin PUR Residential Condominium Cownhousc �7 dwelling units Congregate Care Facility 400 units Assisted I iving Facility 400 beds Campground!Recreatioltttl Vehicle Park 120 camp sites Private School (K -12) 300 students Church 3o,000 square feet — - (AuJPlonunU (1,800 scats) _ Church _ 20,000 square feet (clr,pep t1�oJ spat,) 300 students Day Care Center As previously stated, the church uses within "fable l and 23 of the camp sites are currently constructed on the subject site The site is hordered to the west by Collier Boulevard. To the north, the subject site is bordered by vacant land. Vacant land also borders the subject site along the eastern property boundary. 'Cite Lord's Way forms the southern boundary of the subject site. Access to the entire First Assembly of God PUD is provided to the area roadway network via The Lord's Way. Two (2) full access driveways are shown to The Lord's Way from the subject parcel. One ( I ) site access will serve the church related uses white the easternmost full site access to 'Che Lord's Way will serve the new residential units proposed as a part of this development. 'file [,ofd's Way currently provides full turning movements to Collier Boulevard opposite its intersection with Inverness Club Drive. The Lord's Way is currently a private roadway that borders the subject site to the south. As a part of the mitigation agreement for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment associated with the First Assembly of God PUD, it was agreed that The Lord's Way would have a reservation provided over it in order to provide a future east /west connection to a potential north/south arterial that could be constructed to the east of the subject site. The proposed First Assembly of God PUD will access the Lord's Way via two (2) full access Page 3 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. driveways. The intersection of The l,ord's Way and Collier Boulevard provides full turning movements under unsignalized conditions. The County intends to review the potential signalization of this intersection once it appears the traffic signal warrants may be met at this location. Collier Boulevard is a four -lane arterial roadway along the western boundary of the subject site. Currently, funding is available for the six - laving of Collier Boulevard from U.S. 41 to Davis Boulevard ill Fiscal Year 2010. The six lane conditions on Collier Boulevard are accounted for as a part of the 2006 Collier County Annual Inventory Update Report (AU1R). I'he minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard for this roadway adjacent to the subject site is LOS °F ". Collier Boulevard has a posted speed Limit of 55 mph and is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Transportation Department, ht order to gain a better understanding of the traffic conditions in the vicinity of the subject site. AM and I'M peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord's Way on January 18, 2007. Based on the information contained within the 2006 FDOT Traffic Information CD, the appropriate peak season correction hrctor for January 10' is L 10. Therefore, the turninp movement results were factored by 1.10 in order to determine the 2007 peak season, peak hour turning movements. Figure 2 indicates the resultant 2007 peak season turning movements at the subject intersections. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed re- zoning of the First Assembly of God site will allow for the construction of various church related uses in addition to a new multi - family residential component on the subject site. Specifically, "Cable 2 summarizes the uses for the proposed PUD re -zone on the subject site. Page 4 / N \ W E \ S I FC;FNF) t- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4 -(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION 2007 PEAK SEASON TURNING MOVEMENTS CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD Figure 2 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 2 First Assembly of God PUD Pronosed Uses under New 11111) Land Use Pro uscrl Reyigions Residential Condominium / "I'ownhousc 306 dwelling units Congregatc Care Facility 249 units Assisted Living Facility - - - - To be removed - - -- Private School (K -R) --------._..--- - 300 students Church 30,000 square feet (,\uditutium) (1,800 seats) Church 20,000 square feet (Chapel) (000 seats) Day Care Center 300 students In comparing Table 2 with 'fable 1, the existing approved multi- family units within the site will be incorporated into the new multi - family dwelling unit project on the site. In addition, the 400 bed assisted living facility is being removed in favor of the multi- family dwelling units along with the campground /RV park on the site. Furthermore, the 400 unit congregate care facility will be limited to 249 units as a part of this proposed re- zoning. It should also be noted that ten (10) of the multi- family dwelling units proposed as a part of this PUD re -zone are church related dwelling units. fl)ese ten (10) dwelling units are being transferred From the camp sites currently approved on the subject site. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation calculations were performed for both the existing PUD on the subject site as well as the new PUD proposed on the site. The trip generation for each potential development scenario was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7th Edition. The appropriate Land Uses were utilized to calculate the trip generation of each scenario. Table 3 indicates the trip generation of the uses approved under the existing PUD on the subject site. The subsequent Land Use Codes utilized to calculate the trip generation of each use is indicated within 'fable 3 as well. Based on discussions with the Pastor of the First Assembly oh God church, there will be a significant amount of traffic captured internally Page 6 TRANSPORTATION j� CONSULTANTS, INC. based on the various church related uses. For instance, the residential units on the site are typically utilized to house patients undergoing some form of rehabilitation services. Patients are shuttled to local shopping areas for grocery shopping and any other needs that the patients may have. Flius, a higher internal capture rate was approved for the Church related uses. Specifically, a 40% internal capture reduction was agreed upon with Staf-during the AM peak hour, a 50% internal capture reduction was utilized during the PM peak hour, and a 45% reduction for internal capture traffic was assumed over the course of the entire day. 1ltese reductions are reflected within '['able 3 as well. Table 3 First Assembly of Cod PUD Existinp; PUD Trips A.M. Peak Hour --- - - [,and Use /SizeofUse I Residential Condominium 57 dwelling units (LUC 230) 40 Congregate Care Facility 10 (LUC 253) 400 snits -- Assisted Living 400 beds _(LUC 294) 20 Cam pground /R.V. Park 120 camp sites (LUC 416) 300 students Private School (K -12) (LUC )36) 30,000 sq. f. Auditorium Church (LUC560) (1 800 seats) Church 20,000 sq_ft Chapel (LUC: 560) (600 seat,) Day Care Center 50 20 (LO(: 56)) 300 students Total Trips under Existing PUD Less Internal Capture New Trips under Existing PUD - P.M. Peak Hour 5 30 35 25 15 40 15 10 25 40 30 70 35 20 55 40 50 90 10 t5 25 30 15 4S 135 90 225 20 10 30 10 50 20 10 10 10 5 20 IS 10 5 15 120 105 225 95 100 195 340 285 625 1 270 255 525 -135 -115 -250 -135 -130 -265 205 170 375 135 125 260 In addition to the trip generation of the existing uses approved under the current zoning on the subject site, a trip generation estimate was also performed based on the proposed new PUD for the First Assembly of God site. The resultant trip generation of the proposed uses on the subject site is illustrated within Table 4 below. The aforementioned internal capture reduction was applied to the proposed PUD as well. However, based on the discussions held during the methodology meeting, the internal Page 7 Daily (2-way) 400 810 615 745 275 180 1,360 4,385 -1,975 2.410 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. capture reduction was only applied to the church related uses- In other words, the residential use was not considered for the internal capture reduction. Table 4 First Assembly of God POD Proposed PUD Trins llre Level of Set %icc analysis and intersection analysis performed within this report is based solely on the trip generation of the proposed PUD on the subject site. Therefore, the new trips shown within "I able 4 were utilized to determine whether or not sufficient capacity is available on the adjacent roadway network after the addition of the First Assembly ofGod PUD as currently proposed. V. EXISTING PUD vs. PROPOSED PUD Based on the methodology meeting held with Staff, it was important to perform a comparison of the trip generation for the existing zoning on the site in addition to the proposed new PUD on the First Assembly of God site. Therefore, Table 5 was created. Table 5 indicates the new trips generated as a result of the existing zoning on the site shown in Table 3 in addition to the new trips generated as a result of this proposed re- zoning as seen within Table 4. A negative value within Table 5 reflects a reduction in trips as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Likewise, a positive value Page 8 A.M. Peak (lour - P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use/Size of Use Oyt Total - In — o_ ut - Total hI (2-way) Residential Condominium 306 units 20 105 125 100 50 150 1,660 (LUC 230) 10 5 IS 25 15 40 50S Congregate Care facility 249 units (LUC 2e31 300 students Private School (6 -1 ?-) 135 90 225 20 30 50 745 (Ll1C X36 Church 10 30,000 sq. ft. Auditorium 10 20 10 10 20 275 (LUC560) (1,800 seacs) Church 20,000 scl. It. Chapel (LUC 560) (600 seats) 10 5 15 10 95 5 100 15 180 Day Care ('enter 300 students 120 105 225 195 1,360 (LUC. 565) Total Trips under Proposed PUD 305 320 625 260 210 470 4,725 Less[nterttal Capture -115 -85 -200 -80 -80 -160 -1,380 New Trips under Proposed PUD 190 235 425 180 130 310 3,345 llre Level of Set %icc analysis and intersection analysis performed within this report is based solely on the trip generation of the proposed PUD on the subject site. Therefore, the new trips shown within "I able 4 were utilized to determine whether or not sufficient capacity is available on the adjacent roadway network after the addition of the First Assembly ofGod PUD as currently proposed. V. EXISTING PUD vs. PROPOSED PUD Based on the methodology meeting held with Staff, it was important to perform a comparison of the trip generation for the existing zoning on the site in addition to the proposed new PUD on the First Assembly of God site. Therefore, Table 5 was created. Table 5 indicates the new trips generated as a result of the existing zoning on the site shown in Table 3 in addition to the new trips generated as a result of this proposed re- zoning as seen within Table 4. A negative value within Table 5 reflects a reduction in trips as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the subject site. Likewise, a positive value Page 8 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. retlects a net traffic increase as a result of the proposed re- zoning of the First Assembly of God site. Table First Assembly of God PUD Trip Generation Comparison Land Use A.M. ln Peak llour — Out Total, P.M. Peak Hour Daily (2 -way) — — — In Out F___ Total New Trips under Existing PUD 205 170 375 135 125 260 2,410 New Trips under Proposed PUD t90 235 425 180 130 310 3,345 Trip Difference l5 +65 +50 t45 15 +50 +935 .. .I Imo, "I y .o.. .. a .uuu u uy, u:ncu on uuo pugiusca jevlslons to Ine kx1vll'. 3110 a positive value fepre9e11[S a net (up increase It should be noted that the Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD, as a part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval on the site, agreed to limit the construction of multi - family dwelling units on the site to 150 dwelling units until the substantial completion of the six - faning of Davis Boulevard. Additionally, ten (10) of the dwelling units are associated with the church uses, and these units can be constructed prior to the six - laning of Davis Boulevard. ttowever, upon the completion of the Davis Boulevard six- faning, the remaining 146 multi- family dwelling units could be constructed. Should this proposed PUD re- zoning be approved, this stipulation would remain in place as a part of the updated PUD. VL TRIP DISTRIBUTION The new trips based on the proposed PUD re- zoning indicated within Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the anticipated routes the drivers will utitize to approach the site. The resultant traffic distribution is indicated in Figure 3 as approved within the methodology meeting held with Staff. As can be seen within Figure 3, Staff agreed to a 5% drop off of site traffic along Collier Boulevard between The Lord's Way and Davis Boulevard due to Wal -Mart and other commercial uses available along this link. Staff also agreed to a 5% drop off of site traffic to the Publix Shopping Center located to the south of the site at the northwest corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake hammock Boulevard. Page 9 LEGEND 4-20 %♦ PERCENT DISTRIBUTION / TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD Figure 3 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Based on the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 3, the new external development traffic was distributed to the Collier Boulevard /The Lord's Way intersection. Figure 4 indicates the site traffic assignment to the site access driveways proposed as a part of the proposed First Assembly of God I'UD. Additionally, the site traffic was assigned to the area roadway links as a part of Figure I A, located within the Appendix of this report for reference. Vll. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table IA, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2 "/o- 2 % -3 )/o Significance Test. The new external project related traffic from Table 4 was compared with the corrected 10 -month Level of Service Standard for Peak limit — Peak Direction traffic conditions in order to determine the project impact percentage. Based on the information contained within Table IA, Collier Boulevard along the project frontage is shown to sustain a significant impact as a result of the added project traffic in accordance with the Collier County 2 % -2 % -3% Significance 'hest. Furthermore, Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard are also shown to experience a significant impact as a result of the proposed development. It should be noted that Davis Boulevard was reviewed as both a two -lane arterial as it currently functions in addition to a six -lane arterial roadway. Recently, a Developer's Contribution Agreement (DCA) was approved that will assist Collier County in accelerating the six- faning of this roadway. Currently, six- laning construction is slated to be completed within Fiscal Year 2009/2010. Therefore, Davis Boulevard will be a six -lane facility prior to the build -out of the proposed First Assembly of God PUD. Page I l LEGEND f- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD Figure 4 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table IA also includes a buildout concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The Collier County TIS Guidelines require analysis of the adjacent roadway network based on the five (5) year planning window. Therefore, it was necessary to analyze the surrounding roadway network based on the 2012 traffic conditions. However, it is likely that the proposed First Assembly of God PUD re- zoning hearing will not be held until the year 2008, so the analysis performed within Table IA actually reflects 2013 traffic conditions in an effort to analyze an additional year. fhe total volume indicated within the 2006 Collier County Concurrency Spreadsheet reflects the current remaining capacity on the adjacent roadway network. The remaining capacity was subtracted from the 10 -month service volume on each roadway in order to determine the 2007 peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic volume on the adjacent roadway network. The appropriate annual growth rate for these roadways was taken from the 2006 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report. The calculations to determine the annual growth rates can be found within the Appendix of this report for reference_ These annual growth rates were then used to factor the 2007 peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic volume to 2013 peak season, peak hour, peak direction background traffic conditions. The resultant 2013 peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic volume was subtracted from the Level of Service Standard in order to determine the remaining capacity in the year 2013. 'fhe project generated traffic was then subtracted from the remaining capacity in order to determine the remaining 2013 capacity after the First Assembly of God PUD re- zoning traffic is added to the surrounding roadway network. Figure 5 indicates the results of the capacity analysis along Collier Boulevard, Davis Boulevard, and Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard. Page 13 RADIO ROAD DAVIS BOULEVARD p Q O Z m m z Q m p K C'f Q Q M > Q w � J Z 1 O in m 0.7% 1.7% RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD 772 2.0% (713) [727] 3.0% TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1,102 (1,043) [1,057] 1.7% 13% p Q w O m cr w 290 O O _(172) [200] 36% SITE THE LORD'S WAY 290 (172) [200] 16% 4% LEGEND 000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY (000) REMAINING CAPACITY W/ AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [000) REMAINING CAPACITY W/ PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE 2013 BUILD -OUT TRAFFIC CONDITION (WITH 6 -LANE DAVIS BOULEVARD) FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD N \ E\ =TS 1 -75 Figure 5 TRANSPORTATION r( CONSULTANTS, INC. VIII. PROJI?C'I'ED CONCURI2ENCY AND IMI'ROVEMh:N'I'S Based upon the information contained within Table IA, both Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Drive are shown to operate acceptably after the addition of the First Assembly of Ciod PUD traffic. However, existing Level of-Service deficiencies are shown along Davis Boulevard to the west of ('other Boulevard. As previously stated, this roadway will be six -laned from ('other Boulevard to Radio Road within the Fiscal Year 2009/2010. At such time, sufficient capacity will be available along Davis Boulevard to accommodate the proposed First Assembly of God PUD. In fact, the proposed PUD re -zone would not even significantly impact a six -lane Davis Boulevard. Regardless, as a part of the Cominchensive Plan Amendment approval on the subject site, mitigation was agreed upon with the County and the Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD. Specifically, the Developer has offered to provide a reservation over The Lord's Way in order to provide the County with an east /west connection between Collier Boulevard and a potential future north/south arterial to the east of the subject site. Furthermore, the Developer also stipulated a phasing program for the multi - family dwelling units added as a result of the proposed PUD re -zone. Specifically, the Developer agreed to withhold the construction of 146 multi - family dwelling units until the substantial completion of the Davis Boulevard six - laning. Intersection analysis was performed as a result of the added First Assembly of God PUD traffic. Based on the methodology meeting, intersection analysis was only required at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord's Way /Inverness Club Drive. In order to perform the necessary intersection analysis, it was necessary to determine the 2013 background AM and PM peak hour turning movements at this intersection. Therefore, the turning movements indicated within Figure 2 were factored by the appropriate annual growth rate over a six (6) year period. The annual growth rate for Collier Boulevard (2.73 %) was utilized in order to determine the 2013 background turning movements. The calculation to determine the background turning movements is indicated below: Page 15 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 2013 Turning Movement = (2007 'burning Movement) * (I t AUR) ^(2013 -2007) 2013 "burning Movement = (1,120 vehicles) *(I +0.0273) ^6 2013 Turning Movement 1, 120 vehicles* L 175 201_'> Turning Movement = 1,315 vehicles The above illustrated calculation was applied to all of the turning movements except those to /from The Lord's Way indicated within Figure 2 in order to determine the 2013 background turning movements. The resultant 2013 background turning movements volumes are illustrated within Figure 6. The site traffic indicated within Figure 4 was then added to the 2013 background turning movements in order to determine the 2013 buildout turning movements at the Collier Boulevard /The Lord's Way /Inverness Club Drive intersection. The resultant 2013 buildout turning movements are indicated within Figure 7. The appropriate lane arrangements and the turning movements indicated within Figure 7 were inputted into the SYNCHRO software in order to perform the necessary intersection analysis at the previously mentioned intersections. 'rhe lane arrangements utilized in this analysis can be found in Figure 2A within the Appendix. "fhe intersection was analyzed with only four -lanes of through traffic along Collier Boulevard due to the fact that SYNCHRO is not capable of analyzing unsignalized four - legged intersections on six -lane roadways. It should be noted that the subject intersection was also analyzed under signalized conditions with six -lanes on Collier Boulevard since this intersection is a potential signal location. The results of the intersection capacity analyses can be found within "liable 6 below. Page 16 LEGEND ♦ 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4- (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 2013 BACKGROUND TRANSPORTATION TURNING MOVEMENTS K CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD Figure 6 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 6 SYNCIIR0 Intersection Analysis Results First Assembiv of God PUD Based on the results of the intersection analysis listed above, all intersections and turning movements on Collier Boulevard are shown to operate acceptably. However, the side ` street approaches are shown to experience significant delays, even in background conditions. These side street approaches were analyzed based on a four -lane Collier Boulevard when this roadway will actually consist of six - lanes. Regardless, it is likely that a traffic signal will be required in order to provide sufficient capacity for all movements at the intersection. Should the traffic signal warrants be met, the Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD would be responsible for the proportionate share of the signalization costs. Preliminary turn lane analysis was performed at the intersection of Collier Boulevard with The Lord's Way. C.urrcntly, a 555 -foot southbound left turn bane and a 430 -foot northbound right turn lane exist on Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way. Based on FDOT Index 4301 for a roadway with a 60 mph design speed (5 mph higher than the speed limit), a 405 -foot taper +deceleration distance is required. Therefore, the northbound right turn lane is sufficient under existing conditions. Storage distance is required for the southbound left turn lane. According to the SYNCIIRO analyses, the southbound left turn lane should consist of a minimum of 50 feet of storage length in order to accommodate the 95 "' percentile queue length indicated for the I'M peak hour Page 19 2QI3 Leuel cif Seivucc Ipterscctrori /A�p paclt I3 Ekgrourr Butldout AN1 PM A1VI PM h;B Approach LOS I' LOS F LOS F LOS F (262.1 sec) (73.6 sec) (586 0 see) (3993 sec) wB Approach II LOS D LOS F Los F CAlllel " Blvd ((11 Los c (»Isee) (311 c) (2030see) (26i2 see) The Lord's Way NB left I,OS D LOS D LOS C LOS C __— (27.1 see) (19J see) (27.1 see) (I8_Ssee) SB left LOS 13 LOS c LOS ( ' LOS D (123see) (lybSec) N/A (I5i;cc) (320see) LOS C Collier Blvd (a) The Lord's Way N/A LOS C (with Signal) (260see) (239sec) Based on the results of the intersection analysis listed above, all intersections and turning movements on Collier Boulevard are shown to operate acceptably. However, the side ` street approaches are shown to experience significant delays, even in background conditions. These side street approaches were analyzed based on a four -lane Collier Boulevard when this roadway will actually consist of six - lanes. Regardless, it is likely that a traffic signal will be required in order to provide sufficient capacity for all movements at the intersection. Should the traffic signal warrants be met, the Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD would be responsible for the proportionate share of the signalization costs. Preliminary turn lane analysis was performed at the intersection of Collier Boulevard with The Lord's Way. C.urrcntly, a 555 -foot southbound left turn bane and a 430 -foot northbound right turn lane exist on Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way. Based on FDOT Index 4301 for a roadway with a 60 mph design speed (5 mph higher than the speed limit), a 405 -foot taper +deceleration distance is required. Therefore, the northbound right turn lane is sufficient under existing conditions. Storage distance is required for the southbound left turn lane. According to the SYNCIIRO analyses, the southbound left turn lane should consist of a minimum of 50 feet of storage length in order to accommodate the 95 "' percentile queue length indicated for the I'M peak hour Page 19 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. buildOUl conditions. Therefore, the existing 555 -foot southbound right turn lane will remain sufficient since it provides more than the required 455 feet. No additional turn lane improvements are required as a result of the added First Assembly of God PUD traffic_ IX. CONCLUSION Based on the phasing of the proposed residential dwelling units and the reservation of the Lord's Way, the proposed re- zoning application for the First Assembly of God PUD is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management plan Policy 5.1. The subject parcel is located along the east side of Collier Boulevard at its intersection with The Lord's Way in Collier County, Florida. The surrounding roadway network was analyzed based on the 2013 buildout traffic conditions. As a result, all roadways were shown to operate acceptably after improvements currently planned for these roadways are completed. Specifically, Davis Boulevard will contain sufficient capacity after the six - laning oP this roadway is completed. In an effort to soften the impact of the proposed development, the Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD agreed to phase the multi- family units. Nearly half of the multi- family dwelling units (146 units) will not be constructed until substantial completion of the Davis Boulevard widening. Additionally, the Developer has agreed to offer The Lord's Way to the County in order to provide a public east/west roadway that can provide a connection between Collier Boulevard and a future north/south arterial the County is considering to the east of the subject site. These concessions were offered at the Comprehensive Plan Amendment stage of this development in an effort to mitigate the project's impacts to the surrounding roadway network. Intersection analysis was performed as a part of this report at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord's Way /Inverness Club Drive. This intersection is shown to require signalization in the 2013 traffic conditions in order for all turning movements to operate acceptably. The Developer of the First Assembly of God PUD would be Page 20 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. responsible for the proportionate share of the signalization improvement at this location should the County deem signalization necessary. The existing turn lanes serving the First Assembly of God PUD are sufficient to serve the proposed PUD re- zoning. Therefore, no turn lane modifications are anticipated as a result of the proposed re- zoning. Regardless, the turn lane improvements will be reviewed again at the Site Development Plan (SDP) phase for this project. In closing, the proposed re- zoning of the First Assembly of God PUD is shown to satisfy the Collier County Growth Management Plan requirements indicated within the Transportation Element. "therefore, after the proposed six- laning of Davis Boulevard, the proposed phasing of the subject development, and the donation of The Lord's Way to the County, the surrounding roadway network will operate acceptably after the addition of the First Assembly of God PUD traffic. Page 21 APPENDIX TABLE IA m � w z > LI a a n o z o w u � z z � W Z U K � > U } J � x Q z Q z¢� 0 ry ry v v n U Z W K a � Z D .- O Z t O U U a W K °� U U LL a O z w w 0 z O O z O j O Qoa N� y y y wW J W ° m a W < K O 0 U o Wa Z Q LL w U w _ Z ry a o C7 M � p Z N ry r v m m ry � ry o f F w N a a u O v, m m ry ry ry m w o o Q I- W n x x w r r r- H E G L U - U - F E K W K V Wn v u w O m a m m N m O O E O K ¢ p U K U O U U a s o o n o 0 0 0 x x E a 0 O o o - F FIGURES 1 A & 2A IFCFNn ♦ 000 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC ♦(000) PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TRAFFIC ON IMPACTED ROADWAYS CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD Figure 1A IFrFNn f- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC �j TRANSPORTATION LANE ARRANGEMENTS CONSULTANTS, INC. FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD / N E\ \. S / N.T.S Figure 2A TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS COLLIER BOULEVARD @ THE LORD'S WAY TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: January 18, 2007 DAY: THURSDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) & LORD'S WAY 15 MIN BEGIN — _ - - 9 - COLLIE RROULEVARO(CR951� �L — - - _— LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT iMRll RIGHT �r EF NORTHBOUND THRU RIGHT _ — - __ LORDS WAY � LEFT HART RIGHT � WFSTRO __ _... TOTAL LEFT THIRD RIGHT TOTAL INTER- SECTION TOTAL T.00 AM 1'.15 AM 7 30 AM 7:45AM 8.W AM 8.15AM 8:30 AM 8:45AM_ 0 211 O 1 249 2 0 218 2 0 259 1 5 233 0 1 224 1 0 238 1 ___0 249 I 21 I 252 280 260 238 226 239 250 0 405 2 5 445 6 1 519 3 1 462 8 0 45] 4 2 458 ! 2 457 12 1 0 0 407 456 521 471 461 467 411 I I 14 0 0 0 0 8 n 1, 1 0 1 4 0 0 4 0 1 5 0 5 0 0 O 15 U 0 2 4 5 10 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . _.._ 5 1 2 0 4 0 1 4 ._— 638 709 813 733 701 698 721 255 TOTAL: 7 1941 8 1956 12 320J 42 3251 23 14 7 44 11 0 6 ll 5n4 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) & LORD'S WAY _ V V "` ���` INTER - HOUR _ .. - ._ BEGIN LEFT THRU HBRIGHOT TOTAL LEFT THRU SOUTHBOUND GNHT TOTA� LEFT THRUTR RIIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRUFS RIGHND TOTAL SECTION 7 00 AM 1 997 5 1003 ] 1831 19 1857 10 14 1 25 5 0 3 8 2893 1.15 AM 6 1019 5 1030 7 1883 21 1911 13 0 1 14 3 0 4 7 2962 7.30 AM 6 994 4 1004 4 189G 22 1922 L7 0 2 19 3 0 3 6 2951 7:45 AM 6 954 3 9G3 5- 1834 31 1870 14 0 7 21 4 0 1 5 2859 8.W AM 6 944 3 959 137 23 1400 13 0 G 19 6 0 3 0 oiv PEAK HOUR SUMMARY BEGIN NORTHBOUND _BOUT _ LEFT THIRD RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU ].15 AM 6 1019 5 1030 7 1683 BUUND SECTION RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4 7 9oe9 TRANSPORTATION 1 CONSULTANTS, INC. 27 __. 41 13 J 1% mml� 0 y 14 1 Nu te Porcenls ( °/) re0resent movernanl volumes M1ivitletl by IM1e total intersection baRc DATE: January 18, 2007 DAY: THURSDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM INTERSECTION: COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) & LORD'S 1030 WAY COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) 2947 99% I 1 1887 Y 2911 98% 1036 t 1 N 6 1019 5 21 1883 7 $j 1030 1 4 1 1887 Y 2911 98% 1036 t L4 «� 1 ro 3 19 y 1% 12 1 N 6 1019 5 1 1030 L4 «� 1 ro 3 19 y 1% 12 TRANSPORTATION DATE: January 18, 2007 DAY. THURSDAY CONSULTANTS, INC. COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) & LORD'S WAY mri!T `" ^ °"° - BOUND RIGHT TOTAL G 1625 4 159J 5 t00} 16 1024 1] D n x BEGIN PEAK HOUR SUMMARY PA V] SECTION TOTAL T TRANSPORTATION . 1 CONSULTANTS, INC. a- 42 - m* 21 1 2% 0=► 0 y 33 12 Note: Percents I %) represent movement volumes dlvlded try the total lnlersecHOn Va(fic DATE: January 18, 2007 DAY: THURSDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM INTERSECTION: COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951 ) 8 LORD'S 1 WAY COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951( 3125 99% 1 1494 1631 1 f 1 1458 3 1596 4 1 b L14 «- 0 �— 3 17 24 1% «1 t f 9 1596 4 1 t 1473 1609 I 3082 98% L14 «- 0 �— 3 17 24 1% 2006 FDOT TRAFFIC CD - 2006 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT a .a D, 2 m n v n a n T I lu II r P O r 1 O mw F` CJ C) I N `4 N O O N N O II a n v n a n n 1 II II n o: m II N�00000000.�00000000,ti .I.I .I .IN NN,I.�.ti .v N,I.I.IN N.�,ti N�I.I ��N N��.tiN 41 II �I,1.1 �I O 4 r II b`N II xp Ap lD lD lD 1p 1p l0 `D `O 1p lD xD xD l0 t0 1p m l0 xD ID x0 xD x[ tp AD lD ID LL lV V' tp tp U 1p `D lD `D lD tD AD W t0 xD AD W .D `p tD lD tD N [{ II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.O N N N N N N N NNNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNN N N N N N N N NNNN NNNNN N N O N N N O N N N C V O O N N O N N N N N N N O { N N O Vlx O O t> W II NNr4 .- INNNNNNOI I+IU P mvl .n .p 1p xp tD _ �� n ��o �mrx N U vll CID V m tp m lD l0 tD Ap 1p tD m N lD Ip xp ID `O AD `O ¢` xD xD Ap m .G tD .D ID m .p 1p AD t0 Ap Ap AD lD lD w ID AD AD 1c 1p m AD m m ID �D m An lD 1p O N 1 O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O o 0 o n o o O o o O o O O O O O O I o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 o O O O O o o O o 0 0 o U p O o 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 o p O o O O O I N N N NNNNNNN NNNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNN N N N N N N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N Ol ✓) N Ol xD Ill N Ol lD o T 1p N O f� n N Ol ID (xl O 1p M O 1^ rl O f� P N N T ID N Ol ID 1.1 \ N N P rl _ 000 0000OpO0000Ot) COON r NNri . NNN.INNN W N II o O II O W X II O U W It N N N I � r4 N N N .1 a! N NNNNN N N N N N 1`l rl !1 N Irl Irl (`l 11 N T P P P P P m� Ifl ✓1 � O N Y. N Oi O N to d ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2006ADT "(l nrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) - _1 Base Year ADT Pn) AGR (Collier Blvd) _ 57314 _1 56180 AGR (Collier Blvd) = 2.02% 2006 ANNUAL BASE YR TRAFFIC YRS OF GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT TRAFFIC VOLUME GROWTH RATE' Collier Boulevard N. of Davis Blvd 56180 57314 1 202% N. of Lords Way 38709 39767 1 2 73% N. of Rattlesnake Hammock 38709 39767 1 2,73% S. of Rattlesnake Hammock 34013 34168 1 0.46% County Barn Road N. of Rattlesnake Hammock 11266 12078 4 1,76% Davis Boulevard W. of Radio Road 22726 26441 4 3.86% W. of Collier Blvd 14122 17045 4 4,82% Radio Road W. of Davis Blvd 9976 13601 4 806% Rattlesnake Hammock W. of Collier Blvd 9087 10091 3 3.56% W. of County Barn Rd 14078 16275 4 3.69% For roadways with negative growth rates, an annual growth rate of 1.0 % was assumed. ' All traffic volumes were taken from the 2006 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report The annual growth rates along Collier Boulevard were determined based on one years worth of historical data dues to recent construction in the vicinity of the site SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2006ADT "(l nrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) - _1 Base Year ADT Pn) AGR (Collier Blvd) _ 57314 _1 56180 AGR (Collier Blvd) = 2.02% AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF SUBJECT PARCEL _. ,. a..,; � i� 2 � „ � s' . vv TM? ?: Y`Fi � Y� � w � �... V ,�y +`' � �� n ��� + '�. �+: t`d � , ti + 4 * S i y q � � 1 � 2 TM? ?: Y`Fi � Y� � w � �... V ,�y +`' � �� n ��� + '�. �+: t`d � , ti + 4 * S i y q � � 1 � SYNCHRO INTERSECTION ANALYSIS COLLIER BOULEVARD @ THE LORD'S WAY 2013 BACKGROUND Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard .� -+ 7 � � 2013 AM Background 7/6/2007 4\ t r ► 1 / Lane Configurations 4- r 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 445 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 15 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 55 55 9 Link Distance (ft) 1032 1160 1240 1224 Travel Time (s) 215 26.4 15.4 15.2 Volume (vph) 16 0 1 3 0 4 8 1315 6 8 2430 27 Conti. Peds. ( # /hr) Conti. Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 106% 100% 100% 106% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( # /hr) 0 0 Mid -Block Traffic ( %) 0% 0% 070 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Area Type. Other Control Type: Unsignalized First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh /h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (it) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cent vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh /h) 2013 AM Background 7/6/2007 d r• 4 e ►t 4f r � Tf e Stop 1401 Stop 8 0 Free 711 1407 Free 1296 0% 1 0% 0 3286 0°% 1279 2697 0% 692 16 0 1 3 0 4 8 1315 6 8 2430 27 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 17 0 1 3 0 4 8 1384 6 8 2558 28 11 Raised 3 Raised 3 40 3286 3982 1279 2697 4004 692 2586 1391 2575 2575 Volume Left 1401 1401 8 0 0 711 1407 0 1296 2603 1 4 0 3286 3982 1279 2697 4004 692 2586 1391 Z5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 41 4.1 6.5 5.5 0.03 6.5 5.5 0.41 0.00 0.02 3.5 4.0 13 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 36 100 99 97 100 99 95 98 26 52 160 115 42 391 171 498 Volume Total 18 7 8 692 692 6 8 1279 °6.. 1279 28 ,c Volume Left 17 3 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Volume Right 1 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 28 cSH 28 269 171 1700 1700 1700 498 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.64 0.03 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.02 0.75 0.75 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 262.1 24.1 27.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F C D B Approach Delay (s) 262.1 24.1 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS F C IpS im_rsegt��=+.�uLM�.+ary.���.i�,. � �+ �r'�res��+� `r'�'3?•< �.�.r':tit�..,:� �s,� a � Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants. Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 PM Background 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 716/2007 Lane Configurations '4 r (T r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 190C Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0°% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 445 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 1 1 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 9 15 9 Link Distance (ft) 1032 1160 55 1240 55 1224 Travel Time (s) 23,5 26A t5 -4 15.2 Volume (vph) 16 0 1 3 0 4 8 1315 6 8 2430 27 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) Confl. Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 -95 0.95 0.95 0 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100°% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% l00% -95 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0°% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( #!hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 Mid -Block Traffic ( %) 0% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Free 0% Free ,/dt'e��l�"�'171�di�i°�f�r� tl � Y s v✓„ a ( ': a 'dam Area Type. Other ,d ,At Control Type Unsignalized First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2013 PM Background 1 Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7/6/2007 Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh /h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cent vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh /h) .r r a r 4228 TT r -)t + r Stop 2194 Stop 3 1117 Free 0 1006 Free 0 0% 3108 0% 992 3200 0% 1084 2028 0% 6.5 27 0 15 3 0 15 12 2060 4 3 1885 42 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 28 0 16 3 0 16 13 2168 4 3 1984 44 it Raised 3 Raised 3 40 3108 4188 992 3200 4228 1084 2028 1991 1991 992 2194 2194 28 3 1117 2198 0 1006 2035 0 0 3108 4188 992 3200 4228 1084 2028 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 41 6.5 5.5 1700 6.5 5.5 249 1700 15 4.0 3.3 15 4.0 3.3 2.2 54 100 94 93 100 93 96 62 66 248 45 63 215 283 2173 2173 41 2.2 99 249 vomme iotai 44 19 13 1084 1084 4 3 992 992 44 Volume Left 28 3 13 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Volume Right 16 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 44 cSli 96 259 283 1700 1700 1700 249 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.46 0.07 0.04 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.58 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 49 6 3 0 0 0 1 0 Control Delay (s) 75.6 34.4 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Lane LOS F D C C Approach Delay (s) 75.6 34.4 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS F D Average Delay 10 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation 2013 BUILDOUT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard t--I. i '�'- 2013 AM Buildout 7/17/2007 t 4\ Lane Configurations *T r 4 r Vi tt r rl ,tt - r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0% 0°% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 445 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1032 1160 1240 1224 Travel Time (s) 23.5 26.4 15.4 15.2 Volume (vph) 16 0 1 120 0 122 8 1315 101 103 2430 27 Confl. Pens. (9/hr) Confl_ Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100°/% 100% 100% 100°/% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( # /hr) Mid -Block Traffic ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free lilewk Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page i Metro Transportation HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2013 AM Buildout 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7m/2007 --j_ ---* .- t 4\ 1 /0� �► lr r Lane Configurations +T ?f 4 '� ++ _ r tS tt r Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh /h) 16 0 1 120 0 122 8 1315 101 103 2430 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow rate (vph) 17 0 1 126 0 128 8 1384 106 108 2558 28 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft /s) Percent Blockage Right turn Flare (veh) 11 40 Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 3 3 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 3548 4282 1279 2897 4204 692 2586 1491 vC1, stage 1 cent vol 2775 2775 1401 1401 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 773 1507 1496 2803 vCu, unblocked vol 3548 4282 1279 2897 4204 692 2586 1491 tC, single (s) Z5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 (C, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 IF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 22 2,2 p0 queue free % 0 100 99 0 100 67 95 76 cM capacity (veh /h) 15 30 160 81 22 391 171 457 O.2rRli.g .e. Volume Total 18 255 8 692 -692 106 108 1279 1279 28 Volume Left 17 126 8 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 Volume Right 1 128 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 28 cSH 16 164 171 1700 1700 1700 457 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 1.12 1.56 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.24 075 075 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 68 425 4 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 586.0 203.0 271 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F F D C Approach Delay (s) 586.0 203.0 0,2 0,6 Approach LOS F F Average Delay 14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 PM Buildout 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7/17/2007 '* l f- t4\ 1 �" �► j r Lane Configurations ft r +T e t f: a ++ e Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 445 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 55 55 Link Distance (fl) 1032 1160 1240 1224 Travel Time (s) 23.5 26.4 15.4 15.2 Volume (vph) 27 0 15 68 0 80 12 2060 94 93 1885 42 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) Confl. Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( #Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( # /hr) Mid -Block Traffic ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type. Unsignalized First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2013 PM Buildout 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7/17/2007 t --* -'�v f- '- t 4\ T r" �+ 1 r Lane Configurations 4 r *T r TT r TT r Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh /h) 27 0 15 68 0 80 12 2060 94 93 1885 42 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 28 0 16 72 0 84 13 2168 99 98 1984 44 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 11 40 Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 3 3 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 3332 4473 992 3389 4418 1084 2028 2267 vC1, stage 1 cent vol 2180 2180 2194 2194 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1152 2293 1196 2224 vCu, unblocked vol 3332 4473 992 3389 4418 1084 2028 2267 ItC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 15 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 22 22 p0 queue free % 0 100 94 0 100 61 96 57 cM capacity (veh /h) 20 1 248 43 32 215 283 229 'lds y Volume Total 44 156 13 1084 1084 99 98 992 992 44 Volume Left 28 72 13 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 Volume Right 16 84 0 0 0 99 0 0 0 44 cSH 32 93 283 1700 1700 1700 229 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 1.39 1.68 0.04 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.43 0.58 0.58 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 123 314 3 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 399.5 265.2 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F F C D Approach Delay (s) 399.5 265.2 0.1 1.5 Approach LOS F F Cut 1L�t . e. �iS. �aP5N2L `5iYLLl'l���r,...�f.(�'.�.Atd5 Average Delay 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation 2013 BUILDOUT WITH TRAFFIC SIGNAL Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 AM Buildout with Signal 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7/17/2607 1 /0' `► 1 Lane Configurations 4 r g r Vi fff e ) ?TT if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0% 0°% 0°% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 445 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 Leading Detector (it) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (it) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Link Speed (mph) 30 30 55 55 Link Distance (it) 1032 1160 1240 1224 Travel Time (s) 23.5 26.4 15.4 15.2 Volume (vph) 16 0 1 120 0 122 8 1315 101 103 2430 27 Confl. Peds. ( #/hr) Confl. Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking ( # /hr) Mid -Block Traffic (% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type pm +pt Perm pm +pt Penn Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 -- Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 L0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20-0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 44.0 44.0 Total Split ( %) 10.0% 25.0°/ 25.0 %% 1000/, 25.0% 25.0% 100% 45.0% 45.0% 20.0% 55.0°/% 55.0% Yellow Time (s) 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Pretimed Splits and Phases: 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2013 AM Buiidout with Signal 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 711712007 Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ) +++ r f ?f r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (proq 1805 1615 1805 1615 1805 5353 1615 1805 5353 1615 Flt Permitted 0.68 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow (perm) 1285 1615 1418 1615 1805 5353 1615 1805 5353 1615 Volume (vph) 16 0 1 120 0 122 8 1315 101 103 2430 27 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 17 0 1 126 0 128 8 1384 106 108 2558 28 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 102 0 0 64 0 0 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 17 0 0 126 26 8 1384 42 108 2558 14 Heavy Vehicles ( °/) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Turn Type pm +pt Perm pm +pf Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 16.0 200 160 4.0 32.0 32.0 12.0 40.0 40.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 16.0 20.0 16.0 4.0 32.0 32.0 12.0 40.0 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.20 0.25 0.20 0.05 0.40 0.40 015 0.50 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 347 323 374 323 90 2141 646 271 2677 808 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.02 0.00 0.26 c0.06 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.00 c0.07 0.02 0.03 0.01 We Ratio 0.05 0.00 0.34 0.08 0.09 0.65 0.07 0.40 0.96 0.02 Uniform Delay, dl 22.8 25.6 24.6 26.0 36.3 19.4 14.8 30.7 19.1 10.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 2.4 0.5 1.9 1.5 0.2 L3 9.7 0.0 Delay (s) 23.0 25.6 27.0 26.5 38.2 20.9 15.0 351 28.9 10.1 Level of Service C C C C D C B D C B Approach Delay (s) 23.2 26.7 20.6 28.9 Approach LOS C C C C I64rs0elioniutiarpary; �K HCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3°/ ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 PM Buildout with Signal 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7/17/2007 � -* 7 � ~ t 4\ Lane Configurations +T r +T r ) ttf r ) ttf r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade ( %) 0% 0°% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 280 0 1000 0 0 555 445 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Total Lost Tiine (s) L0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Link Speed (mph) 30 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1032 1160 1240 1224 Travel Time (s) 23.5 26.4 15.4 15.2 Volume(vph) 27 0 15 68 0 80 12 2060 94 93 1885 42 Confl. Peds. ( # /hr) Confl Bikes ( # /hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100°% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Bus Blockages ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic ( %) 0°% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type pm +pt Perm pm +pl Perm Prot Perin Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 -° Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) L0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L0 4.0 L0 L0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 37.0 37.0 10.0 39.0 39.0 Total Split ( %) 10.7% 267% 267% 107% 26,7% 267% 10.7% 49.3% 49.3% 13.3% 52.0% 52 -0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 05 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Actuated Cycle Length: 75 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Pretimed Splits and Phases: 3: Inverness Club Drive & Cnllier Rnulevard First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation RU M First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2013 PM Buildout with Signal 3: Inverness Club Drive & Collier Boulevard 7117/2067 ---* 1 1< ~ t `\ t i' j r Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r yj } f} r Vi ,t„t•,r, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (Prot) 1805 1615 1805 1615 1805 5353 1615 1805 5353 1615 Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (Penn) 1349 1615 1404 1615 1805 5353 1615 1805 5353 1615 Volume (vph) 27 0 15 68 0 80 12 2060 94 93 1885 42 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 28 0 16 72 0 84 13 2168 99 98 1984 44 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 66 0 0 55 0 0 23 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 3 0 72 18 13 2168 44 98 1984 21 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2/ 0% Turn Type pm +pt Perm pm +pt Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 16.0 20.0 16.0 4.0 33.0 33.0 6.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 16.0 20.0 16.0 4.0 33.0 33.0 6.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 021 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 TO 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 384 345 396 345 96 2355 711 144 2498 754 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.01 0.01 c0.41 c0.05 0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.04 0.01 0.03 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.18 0.05 0.14 0.92 0.06 0.68 0.79 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 20.6 233 21.2 215 33.9 19.8 12.1 33.6 16.9 10.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 01 1.0 0.3 2.9 7.3 0.2 23.0 27 0.1 Delay (s) 20.9 23.3 22.2 23.8 36.8 27.1 12.3 56.5 19.7 10.9 Level of Service C C C C D C t3 E 8 B Approach Delay (s) 21.8 23.0 26.5 21 2 Approach LOS C C C C Inter g ape SumlligD" ` HCM Average Control Delay 23.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group First Assembly of God PUD Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 Metro Transportation TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD PUD ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7`t' EDITION Land Use Weekday AM Peak Flour Weekday I'M Peak Hour Weekday Residential Condominium Ln (T) - 0.80 Ln (X) t 0.26 Ln (T) = 0.82 Lu (X) +0.32 (LUC 230) . -- - 17 % entering 83 %exrttug _.. - Ln (T) - 0.85 Ln (X) + 2.55 69 %entering 1 330 ", „exiting - T = Trips, X = dwelling units _ -- --- - -- -- i Congregate Care facility I - 0.06 (X) 1 0,17 (X) -� _- - _ - .- "I' -- 2.02 X (LUC, 253) 59 %entering 42 %exi[m� 55` %enteung �4� %exiting ( ) Trips, X = dwelling units -- - -- _ Assisted Living l = 0.14 (X) - -I,n I 0_. (X) _ ) 65 "/o enlenn�� ° (l) 0.56 Ln (X) t 3.07 (LUC �4 = 31 5 /” exiting 44% uitenng 66 /� exiting T= Trips, X -- beds - - -�- Cantpground /RV Park ( LUC 416 ) X _ 42 %nte n 5_%exig - N/A 69 %enter entering 31 %exiting -- Trips, X = N of camp sites - -- Private School (K -12) C -0.86 (X) 34 44 f O.17 (X) -- — - (LUC 536) - - - —- - _ - 61 /a entering >9 %exiting - -- T = 2.48 (X) - 43 %entering 57 %exiting - .. _. --- T = "Grips, X = # of students _ Church T 0.72 (X) I - 0.66 (X) - -_- -- 1 =9.11 (X) (LUC 560) 54 %entering � 46 °/o exit m 52'%. entenn_ � 18'r �xiting� T_ l rips X ° 1,000's of sq. ft GI,A -- Day Care Center 1 0.73 (X) 5.24 Ln (1 6,87 1 n (X) 0.32 'I' - 4.55 ) -5.64 (LUC 565) 53 %entenng�7%exitm,, �ri 7 %enteng �3 ° /�exiting� ( X =lops, X =Y{of students - Agenda Item 4.0. CoiL'ie-r C; 141-My STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: March 5, 2007 RE: PETITION CPSP- 2005 -14, SENDING LANDS RE- DESIGNATION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) AGENT /APPLICANT: Multiple — the agents and owners of 90 properties are identified on the attached re- designation spreadsheet. However, Collier County government is the petitioner. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: This petition consists of 90 properties comprising ±3,606 acres. They are located in the following Sections - Townships- Ranges and general areas: Section Two Rno Area 34 47 27 2 miles N -NW of Fairgrounds 3 48 27 1.75 miles N -NW of Fairgrounds 11 48 26 2 miles N of CR951 /Immokalee Rd. intersection 25 49 26 2 miles E of CR951 in North Belle Meade 29,32 49 27 N of 1 -75 in North Belle Meade 13, 14, 22, 27 49 27 N of 1 -75 in North Belle Meade NRPA 15,21 51 27 N -NW of US41 /CR92 intersection REQUESTED ACTION: In each case, the property owner is requesting the property be re- designated from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands to either Neutral Lands or Receiving Lands (whichever it abuts). BACKGROUND and PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On June 19, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) a/k/a comprehensive plan to establish the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District ( RFMUD) and related Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program for ±73,000 acres designated on the countywide Future Land Use Map as Agricultural /Rural and generally located between the Golden Gate Estates subdivision and the coastal urban area. The RFMUD consists of Sending Lands, Receiving Lands, and Neutral Lands. Sending Lands are so designated because, at the landscape (macro) scale (not site - specific parcel by parcel view), they contain lands of higher environmental value — wetlands, listed species habitat, etc. Accordingly, allowable land uses are greatly restricted and native Agenda Item 4.0. vegetative retention standards are stringent (80 %). The desire is for these lands not to be developed and instead transfer (send) the residential development rights from these Sending Lands to Receiving Lands, lands possessing lesser environmental value and where development is directed and encouraged. Each of the 90 subject parcels is designated RFMUD Sending Lands, though five are partially Receiving Lands as well, and some are also within a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay and /or the North Belle Meade (NBM) Overlay; and, each is zoned A, Rural Agricultural, and is within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use zoning overlay and some are in the NRPA and /or NBM zoning overlays. During the public hearings in 2002, many owners of proposed (and now - designated) Sending Lands asserted their property had been previously cleared or otherwise did not warrant the Sending Lands designation. Recognizing this possibility — it was made well -known that the designations were based upon landscape scale analysis, but also that allowing Receiving or Neutral Lands designations to be surrounded by Sending Lands designations (Swiss cheese concept — holes of Receiving or Neutral Lands within Sending Lands) was not acceptable, the BCC included a GMP provision giving a one year window in which owners of Sending Lands property that share a boundary with either Receiving Lands or Neutral Lands could submit data and analysis in an effort to demonstrate that, as of the date of adoption of the RFMUD (June 19, 2002), the Sending Lands designation was not warranted. Also, staff would re- evaluate the data used in 2002 (panther telemetry data, red - cockaded woodpecker nesting and foraging habitat data, land cover classification data, etc.) to determine the boundaries of Sending Lands. Please see the GMP provision below. Future Land Use Element (FLUE), RFMUD Sending e ands "11. Adjustment to the Sending Land Boundaries. For all properties designated Sending Lands where such property is contiguous to a Sending Land/Neutral Land boundary or Sending Land/Receiving Land boundary, the County will provide written notice to the property owners to advise of the opportunity to submit additional data and analysis to the County in an attempt to demonstrate a change to the boundary is warranted. Said written notice will be provided within three months of the effective date of these Rural Fringe amendments. Within one year from the date these notices are sent, the County will initiate a Growth Management Plan amendment to consider boundary changes, based upon the data and analysis, as may be warranted. Under the following conditions, adjustments may be proposed to Sending Land boundaries: a) The property is contiguous to Neutral or Receiving Lands; b) Site specific environmental data submitted by the property owner, or other data obtained by the County, indicates that the subject property does not contain characteristics warranting a Sending designation; c) An adjustment to the Sending land boundary requires an amendment to the Future Land Use Map." During the allotted one year period, twelve submittals were received comprised of 98 parcels (but only 90 are under consideration as two are already designated Neutral Lands and six were subsequently withdrawn). The total acreage of these 90 parcels is ±3,606 though that includes roughly 1,245 acres of Receiving Lands as five parcels have split Sending /Receiving Lands designations, leaving about 2,361 acres of actual Sending Lands. Per BCC direction in October 2005, contiguous parcels under the same ownership are to be viewed as a single property for purposes of determining if the property is contiguous to Receiving or Neutral Lands. However, 2 Agenda Item 4.0. in viewing the submitted data and analysis for purpose of determining the appropriateness of Sending Lands designation, each tax parcel is viewed separately. Given that the burden is on the property owner to demonstrate the Sending Lands designation is not warranted, staff's approach is to look for conclusive evidence. Most of the submittals simply verify the existence of native vegetation on the subject parcels. The attached re- designation spreadsheet identifies each tax parcel, its location, staff's recommendation and rationale, and other information. As noted on the spreadsheet, and on the two maps identifying the 96 parcels, staff is recommending only 16 parcels be re- designated from Sending Lands to Neutral or Receiving Lands. These 16 parcels are highlighted on the spreadsheet, and outlined in red on the maps. One issue unrelated to the submitted data and its evaluation pertains to authorization of property owners for their property to be submitted and evaluated in this process. Some agents have submitted a notarized letter of authorization to demonstrate they have the legal authority to represent the owners of the subject parcels for which they have submitted data and are requesting a re- designation; however, some have not — and may not have been previously advised by staff of the need to do so. (The owners of one property listed under the agent Don Lester /15,000 Coalition recently met with staff and advised they never granted authorization to that agent or any other to represent them in this process.) Only a property owner or their authorized agent may petition the County to request a GMP amendment. Therefore, staff will advise all agents and property owners for which a notarized letter of authorization has not been provided, of the need to do so; failure to provide such a letter will likely result in the affected properties being withdrawn from this GMP amendment requesting re- designation. Finally, a GMP amendment such as this would ordinarily be evaluated for impacts upon infrastructure, effect upon the TDR program, compatibility considerations, etc. However, amendment is being reviewed only under the specific criteria established in the FLUE and stated above, as it is a special provision authorized by the BCC in the 2002 Rural Fringe GMP amendments (which were subsequently found to be in compliance with state statutes by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Note: Two property owners are participating in this petition and have filed their own petition -- I.M. Collier Joint Venture, petition CP- 2005 -8; and, Francis and Mary P. Hussey, CP- 2005 -12. STAFF ANALYSIS: As previously noted, staff has reviewed each property to determine if it abuts Receiving or Neutral Lands, and has reviewed the data and analysis submitted by property owners and has re- reviewed data used by the County in 2002 to determine if either conclusively demonstrates property characteristics do not warrant Sending Lands designation. The results of these analyses are indicated on the attached re- designation spreadsheet. As to GMP consistency, this is a proposed amendment to the countywide Future Land Use Map as specifically allowed by the FLUE. For those properties that are re- designated, they will be subject to all GMP requirements and limitations of the new Future Land Use Map designation, including the native vegetation retention requirements of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Staff's determination for each parcel is identified on the attached re- designation spreadsheet. Staff is recommending only 16 parcels be re- designated, as noted on the spreadsheet and as identified on the two attached maps (in red cross hatch). Agenda Item 4.0. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS County staff duly advertised, noticed and held the required NIM on January 17, 2007, at 5:30 p.m., at the Golden Gate Community Center. The meeting was attended by approximately 55 persons in addition to staff present. A meeting summary is provided below. Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department staff member David Weeks provided background of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) and its establishment in the Growth Management Plan (GMP) in 2002; generally explained allowable uses in Sending Lands, Receiving Lands and Neutral Lands; explained the GMP included a provision for owners of Sending Lands along the Sending /Receiving or Sending /Neutral boundary to submit environmental data in an effort to demonstrate that their property does not warrant the Sending designation and that the designation should be changed to the abutting designation (either Receiving or Neutral); noted that owners of 92 properties [now 901, comprising 3,646 acres [now 3,606], took advantage of this opportunity and submitted data; advised that, based upon staff's preliminary review of the data, only about 10 properties would be recommended for change, but noted the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) would make the final determination; and, advised that the County regulations require notification of owners within 1,000' of any of these properties for which the re- designation request was made so that they might be aware of requested land use changes that could potentially impact their property. Also, that the owners initiated these requests but that the County was taking the requested amendments forward through the hearing process at no cost to the owners. David referred to the table at the back of the room which contained his business cards for future contact; a sign -up sheet as sometimes people want there to be an official record to show they attended; and, a handout containing excerpts from the GMP (RFMUD of the Future Land Use Element) — this opportunity to request re- designation, and portions of the Sending /Receiving/ Neutral Lands designations. David invited the audience to contact him with any follow -up questions and/or to check the Department's website for additional information about this petition, e.g. hearing dates, Staff Report. Several questions were asked about Sending /Receiving /Neutral designations, such as what the allowable uses are [David explained]; if nearby owners would be notified of future development for those properties successful in this re- designation request [depends — yes if a public hearing process is involved, e.g. conditional use, no if not, e.g. building permit]; about the GMP amendment process, including whether they could file a request for re- designation [David explained; yes, anyone has a right to submit an application but at their own expense]; whether the County owned any of this property [no] or initiated this request on behalf of any owner [no]. Various comments were made pertaining to the history of the RFMUD, the process to establish it, the Rural Fringe Advisory (citizen) Committee appointed by the BCC, opinions about the RFMUD and the (inappropriate) designation of some properties as Sending Lands, various procedural matters of state law (e.g. dispute resolution process, visioning process). In response to a question, David advised the first set of hearing dates as: Environmental Advisory Council — first Wednesday in February [7'h]; Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) — March 5, with carryover dates to be decided at the CCPC's 1/18/07 hearing; BCC — June 4 with carryover date to 51h. EAC RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) held their hearing on this petition on February 7, 2007. At that time, staff advised that properties under ownership by Curtis Mitchell (map property numbers 12 -16, 93) were withdrawn from this petition at petitioner's request, thus staff's recommendation was modified accordingly. Also, staff advised they would be making a Agenda Item 4.0. site visit with the petition agent for map property number 1 and 2. The EAC recommended approval for re- designation per staff's modified recommendation, except for map property numbers 1 and 2, which were continued to the March 7 EAC hearing so that interested EAC members could make a site visit. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This staff report has been reviewed and approved by the Office of the County Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP- 2005 -14 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to transmit - but only for map property numbers 1, 36 -41, 43, 56, 61, 70, 79, 91, 92, 95 and 96 (identified on the attached re- designation spreadsheet, and depicted in red cross hatch on the two attached maps) - to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. [At the CCPC hearing, staff will report on its site visit to view map property numbers 1 and 2; as a result of this site visit, the preceding staff recommendation could be slightly modified.] PREPARED BY: N�) �' 14 t% ' DATE: DAVID WEEKS, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: Iff "I - DATE: RANDY COHEN, AICP, DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: W' YL �J�ZAaP�,.¢ —���0 DATE: MA RIE°�V.�TUDENT -S IRLING ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY APPROVED BY: Agenda Item 4.0. 2 - ZD -0-7 2 `20 -o�- JO E K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR DATE: C MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & lo 2 N RONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PETITION NO.: CPSP - 2005 -14 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007, BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN Transmittal CCPC Staff Report CPSP -05 -14 G: Comprehensive \Comp. Planning GMP DATA \Comp. Plan Amendments\2005 Petitions \CPSP - 2005 -14, Sending Lands Re- designation dw12 -19.07 Item VI.D. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF November 7, 2007 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: CPSP- 2005 -14 Petition Name: RFMUD Sending Lands Re- designation Requests (Comprehensive Plan Amendment initiated by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department) [Adoption hearing] Applicant: Multiple — the owners of 20 properties (please see attached spreadsheet identifying property owners and agents) II. LOCATION: This petition consists of 20 properties comprising +283 acres. They are located in the following Sections - Townships -Ranges and general areas: Section Twp Rng Area 34 47 27 2 miles N -NW of Fairgrounds 3 48 27 1.75 miles N -NW of Fairgrounds 29 49 27 2 miles N of I -75 in North Belle Meade 13 49 27 3 miles N of I -75 in North Belle Meade 15,21 51 27 N -NW ofUS41 /CR92 intersection III. BACKGROUND and PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The attached staff report for the February 7, 2007 EAC meeting provides the complete background and project description for this petition. In short, this is an amendment applicable to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands located along the border of Sending/Receiving or Sending/Neutral boundaries, for which each property owner had an opportunity to submit data and analysis in an effort to demonstrate that, as of June 19, 2002, the date the Rural Fringe GMP amendments were adopted, the property did not contain characteristics to warrant designation as Sending Lands. A copy of the property owner submittals is attached. In February and March of 2007, at Transmittal hearings, the EAC considered the complete, original submittal comprised of 90 parcels (96 were submitted but 6 were withdrawn). The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County — Commissioners (BCC) also considered the complete submittal, but the BCC only approved 20 parcels for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) et al for preliminary review for statutory compliance. The attached, previously EAC Meeting 2/7/07 referenced, spreadsheet identifies each of those 20 tax parcels; their location; staff's recommendation and rationale, as well as the recommendation of EAC and CCPC — all at Transmittal hearings; and other information. The attached two maps identify those same 20 parcels. The DCA issued their Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on October 8, 2007, in which an Objection was raised pertaining to two properties — two sets of parcels (see below). If an Objection is not adequately addressed when adopted, then DCA may (presumably will) find the amendment not in compliance with Chapter 163, F.S. If that occurs, the non - compliant amendment does not become effective, and an administrative hearing process begins. Attached, as part of the ORC Report package from DCA, is correspondence DCA received from the Florida Wildlife Federation pertaining to map parcels 3 -10. ORC Report OBJECTIONS: 1. CPSP- 2005 -14: Change From Sending Lands to Receiving Lands and Neutral Lands Parcels #3 to #10: The County is proposing to re- designate some properties located in North Belle Meade (Parcels #3 to #10 in the County's list) from Sending Lands to Neutral Lands. The amendment would allow encroachment of development into an area that provides habitat for a variety of wildlife, including the Florida Black Bear and Florida Panther. That encroachment would compromise the environmental integrity and values of the North Belle Meade (NBM) Sending lands. These lands have the same environmental attributes as the other NBM Sending lands; to approve a change from Sending Land designation to Neutral Land designation would jeopardize the preservation of this area as a wildlife habitat. Parcels 36 -41 95 and 96: The County is proposing to re- designate these parcels from Sending Land designation to Receiving Land designation. According to the information provided, the northern 42.69 -acres of the subject site are developed, and the southern 10.37 -acres are undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands. While the northern 42.69 -acres that is already developed, may not support wildlife, the southern portion of the property is still undeveloped and has intact native vegetation which has the potential to support wildlife. The southern portion of the property has the same characteristics as the properties on the west, east and south of the site that are also designated Sending Lands. Although, endangered species were not found on the site, according to the information provided, these species have the potential to locate on the site. Florida panthers and Black bear telemetry information provided show that these mammals have been located in the vicinity of the site. In light of this information, the designation of this property as Sending Lands especially in the case of the southern portion was appropriate. No information has been provided to refute the Sending Land designation in the case of the southern portion of the site. [Chapter 163.3177(6)(a), & (d), & (8), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J- i:, EAC Meeting 2/7/07 9J- 5.005(2)(a), (c); 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., & (3)(c)6., and 9J- 5.013(2)(c)3., 5, & 6., Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C)]. Recommendation: The Department recommends that the Sending Lands designation for Parcels #3 to #10 be retained because that site is a part of the general area with native vegetation and has the potential to support wildlife which is consistent with the intent of the Sending Lands designation. With respect to Parcels 36 -41, and 95 to 96 the Department recommends that the southern portion of the subject site be retained in Sending Land designation. County Response to ORC Report The County may respond to the ORC Report in one of four ways at Adoption: 1. not modify the amendment, but provide additional explanation of what the amendment is about, its purpose, what it will achieve [appropriate if we believe DCA simply does not understand/has misunderstood the amendment] and/or provide additional data and analysis to support the amendment; or 2. modify the amendment, so as to address the ORC issue; or, 3. modify the amendment, and provide additional explanation and/or provide additional data and analysis; or, 4. not adopt the amendment. Mau Parcels 3 -10 Staff's Transmittal recommendation not to approve re- designation is unchanged (EAC & CCPC had same recommendation). The applicant's data does not constitute compelling evidence that the property was inappropriately designated as Sending Lands on June 19, 2002, when the Rural Fringe amendments were adopted. Though portions of the site have been [lawfully] cleared since that date, this is not relevant for this particular GMP amendment process. If the County does not follow DCA's recommended action, there is the risk of a non - compliance determination by DCA. Map Parcels 36 -41, 95.96 Staff s review of the ORC Report yields that DCA mistakenly included two parcels (97 and 98) that were requested for re- designation along with parcels 36 -41, 95 and 96, but that were not approved for Transmittal. Therefore, rather than 10+ acres of land that is "undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands," there are +3.7 acres of vegetated land. On a lesser point, agency jurisdictional wetland determinations have not been made; rather, the data submitted by the property owner's environmental consultant identified potential jurisdictional wetland delineations (for +_3.49 acres of the +3.7 acres). In considering whether to maintain the Transmittal recommendation to re- designate the entire property to Neutral Lands, or to acquiesce to DCA's recommendation to leave the vegetated [southeasterly +3.7 acres] portion of the site (portion of parcel 96) as Sending Lands, staff notes the following points. Re- designate Entire Site as Neutral: 3 EAC Mceting 2/7/07 • The +3.7 acres that contain [native] vegetation represent 37% of the +10 -acre parcel 96, or 8% of the +45 -acre site (all 8 parcels combined). In 2002, one general guideline applied to determine property designation was the percentage of native vegetation present. Sending Lands had a threshold of >80% and Receiving Lands had a 15% threshold. • If the site was re- designated as Neutral Lands, it would be subject to Policy 6.1.2b. in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, which states "A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area, shall be preserved." Therefore, if non - agricultural development was proposed, 2.22 acres (60 %) of the +3.7 acres would have to be preserved, and 1.48 acres (40 %) could be cleared — unless prohibited by state or federal agency requirements. This 1.48 acres is de minimis. Re- designate All But ±3.7 Acres as Neutral: - In the original designation of Sending/Receiving/Neutral Lands, the County originally, and generally thereafter, did not consider property lines, rather followed habitat boundaries. DCA is recommending just that — follow habitat boundaries rather than property boundaries. - As part of this very petition, the County has recommended and approved at Transmittal, following habitat boundaries rather than property boundaries such that portions of a property contain different designations (map parcels 2, 91, 92). - If the County does not follow DCA's recommended action, there is the risk of a non - compliance determination by DCA. IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: This is a proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Element as specifically allowed by the FLUE. For those properties that are re- designated, they will be subject to all GMP requirements and limitations of the new Future Land Use Map designation, including the native vegetation retention requirements of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends: • map parcels 1, 2, 91 and 92 be re- designated from Sending Lands to Receiving Lands, as approved for Transmittal by the BCC; • map parcels 36 -41 and 95 be re- designated from Sending Lands to Neutral Lands, as approved for Transmittal by the BCC; • map parcel 96 be re- designated from Sending Lands to Neutral Lands, as approved for Transmittal by the BCC, EXCEPT for the southeasterly +3.7 acres; and, • map parcels 3 -10 not be re- designated, rather remain as Sending Lands. 4 EAC Meeting 2/7/07 PREPARED BY: David Weeks, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department REVIEWED BY: Randall Cohen, AICP, Director Comprehensive Planning Department Environmental Services Department APPROVED BY: K. Schmitt, Administrator mity Development & Environmental Services Division /0 -3c -o7 Date Date /C -3y -017 Date iO �0 v Date EAC Staff Report CPSP -05 -14 Sending Lands Re-designation - Adoption G: Comprehensive/Comp. Planning GMP DATA/Comp. Plan Amendment0005 Peftns/CPSP- 2005 -14, Sending Lands Re- designation dw/10 -30 -07 5 0 c E K m m t U LL m C E ro O N O K 0 O H 9 � N C Ip o c EcO1 E m o � N E C O E � c ~ " E A � � 5 m > 'o > 0 d d a V O m C n � N m � m p V C � N c E +I C _ E m or E > O N E o m a a d � 3 °a 0 N N 3 N d N N N O U D m � +I 101 ry N N N N m E m E d O T N N Qf N ry N t m o m o c'a c ao °c a °c o d ry LL @ LL U O O N p � M N N > n o m a g II II II d T O _O am a � 5 c 'C LL o .2 co) o��Q�� Q K yl O T T T T T T T T T T T T „acs+ ry LL m N m m V� N N N N N N N 41 N CO T T 6 T T T T T T T T T T V E 'a9 T Ea 111 T T T T T T T T T T T F E N N qq N N N N N d N N N N N N N N N N O N T T 6 T T T T T T T T T T 00000000 mmmmmmmm d o o m m m m m m m m Z Z Z Z Z Z Z c c '5; > lac.wlw. 1 88 �N K K K K K K K c Q Q 00000000 Q Q OLLLL 22222222 CL CL C CI ti K K m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z KK ZOO ZOO Z Z „ LL C C)Cg C C C „ K m m d d d v c g c mw mvnm(na)cnlnln V) (n a' K r nIn ���pp �q evevvvvv v a f�qq ��pp {�qq ��qq ��p 1013 014? da���������� M� eD M LO W R M i N M g E- $ S LL o Z— O a'DO DODUUUI� � 0 0 N Su Q N E tll U Y! !/i N Vl N N V LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E� D: `��� aad�d�a�a�a�Q (D (D LL m C E ro O N O K 0 O H 9 � N C Ip o c EcO1 E m o � N E C O E � c ~ " E A � � 5 m > 'o > 0 d d a V O m C n � N m � m p V C � N c E +I C _ E m or E > O N E o m a a d � 3 °a 0 N N 3 N d N N N O U D m � +I 101 ry N N N N m E m E d O T N N Qf N ry N t m o m o c'a c ao °c a °c o d ry LL @ LL U O O N p � M N N > n o m a g II II II d T O TAI Am)am.� MANAGEMENT January 21, 2004 Mr. Mac Hatcher Community Development and Environmental Services Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Determination of Sending and Receiving lands relative to parcel numbers 770120003 and 751440003. Dear Mac; AMP P R vi'gxf #!iz Thank you for taking the time to meet with me in December regarding the disposition of two portions of parcels owned by West Florida Agro, Ltd. (WFA Land Co.) in the southern portion of the Rural Fringe Assessment Area. You may recall from our discussion that portio s of two parcels, (Folio Nos. 770120003 and 751440003) were designates Sending lands during the Rural Fringe Assessment. Those areas are identified on exhibit 1 (attached) and on a - copy of the map the property owner received titled "Your Parcel Locations ", also attached. The property owner is requesting a re- evaluation of the two identified portions of these parcels and believes they were mistakenly identified as "Sending" when they should be designated as "Receiving" Lands. The approximate location of the dividing line between Sending and Receiving lands is shown on an aerial (Exhibit 1). More specifically, the two areas are shown in greater detail on two aerials, exhibits 2 and 3. In both cases, closer scrutiny indicates that the areas do not consist of native vegetation, but are part of the active agriculture operation that has been occurring on -site for decades. More specifically, both areas are ditched and diked and are used as impoundment areas for water that is both pumped onto and extracted from the land. The stark contrast between the two agricultural areas identified and the adjacent un- impacted lands is quite clear on the attached exhibits. I took photos of the area, but the height of the berms and the difficulty of crossing the canals made them of marginal use. I would however be happy to accompany you or one of the environmental staff on a site visit to confirm that the areas are in use and do not represent in any way a native landscape worthy of designation as a "Sending Area ". Phone: 239- 262 -6197 Fax: 239 - 262 -6198 • Email: TalonMonagement@earthlink.net Office Address: 3898 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 202, Naples, FL 34103• Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9229, Naples, FL 34107 Please review this information and contact me with any questions. We are currently trying to work with the Public Works Department to assist them in determining appropriate locations for water and wastewater treatment facilities in addition to wells for extraction of potable water. An expeditious review of this matter would assist us greatly in meeting their requested timeframe with regard to the future location of public facilities. Once I have a written recommendation from you, I will submit it with a cover letter to Glenn Heath with a formal request for a change in designation. Sincerely, Talon Management, Inc. 7* i Tim Hancock, AICP President Cc: Peter Dessak, WFA Land Co. (w/ attachments) Marlene McLaughlin, Collier County Utilities (w /o attachments) 4,4 L. , Tmikl arm.- Ile. w 0 N a i 0 0 N N m� a w L9,72 J 4 C= f dd yi L I _ o x u 1 � r s �} I FOLIO #751446003 WFA LAND CO INC Section 29 Section 28 T51 R27 T51 R27 I n 32 Section 33 R27 T51 R27 3m. �Sectloo ►'L r'51 R 27 III 27 Section 1� T51R27 Your Parcel Locations MI J FOLIO #770120003 WFA LAND CO INC 3ectIL 22 Section 23 T51 R27 T51 R27 Section 27 T 51.R 27 Section 34 T51 R27 Rural Fringe QSelected Parcels RF- Neutral RF- Receiving RF- Sending 51 R27 Coer County tkk N IRe W +E rrYrrj//1 Section 35 S 151 R27 ' srem o eao tsoo aaao n.x.m e. coES cn� cis �m�ow.mu�renme -asm�w s.tt wa.mm taw MAP P ROPE ATY &- /w iti 310- yl R 5 -tiY AMERICAN * FARMS David Weeks Chief Planner Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: FLUM Amendment American Farms, LLC 11/4/04 Dear Mr. Weeks: By letter dated November 6, 2003, your department notified landowners regarding the opportunity to submit additional data and analysis to the County in an attempt to demonstrate a properties designation should be changed from Sending Lands to Receiving Lands. American Farms, LLC wishes to be included in the Counties upcoming 2005 Cycle 1 Growth Management Plan Amendments. Please find enclosed a completed application and all supporting environmental documents for your review in considering the redesignation of lands located on the American Farms, LLC 55± Acre Property. C ' t' R. Somo� A Managing Director P.O. Box 990490 * Naples; Florida 34116 -6060 1484 Kean Avenue S.W. * Naples, Florida 34117 Phone 941.455.0300 * Fax 941.455.1755 Education Experience Continuing Education Professional Associations Certifications ANDREW WOODRUFF Senior Ecologist, Passarella and Associates, Inc. Environmental consultant and ecological services for private and public development, and road projects. Services include state, federal, and local wetland and wildlife permitting; agency negotiations; environmental impact assessments; ecological assessments; listed species surveys, permitting and relocation; state and federal wetland jurisdictionals; wetland mitigation design, construction observations and monitoring. M.S. Environmental Engineering 1993. Major: Aquatic Science University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Thesis: Florida Springs Chemical Classification and Aquatic Biological Communities B.S. Biology 1989 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia Ecologist, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., Fort Myers, Florida, December 1992 — August 1997. Environmental consultant to private land owners, land planners, commercial and residential developers, engineering firms, and state and federal agencies. Experience in state and federal wetland delineation, endangered species surveys, ecological monitoring, prescribed burns, gopher tortoise relocation, and land mapping. • Basic Prescribed Fire Training. Hillsborough Community College. (1993) • Florida Association of Benthologists Annual Keys Workshop. Keys Marine Laboratory, Long Key, FL. October 16 -18, 1996. • 12'h Annual Environmental Permitting Summer School, Marco Island, FL. July 1998. • Shorebird Seminar with Ted Below, Rookery Bay, Naples, FL. January 1998. • Dr. David Hall, Plant Identification Workshop 1999. • Master Wildlifer Program 2003. • Creation and Restoration of Wetlands Course. The Ohio State University; held in Naples, FL. April 2003. Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Local Board of Directors (1999) Society of Wetland Scientists Coastal Conservation Association U.S. Power Squadron San Carlos Bay Chairman Environmental Committee (1999) Certified Wetland Delineator by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Certified Prescribed Bum Manager by the Florida Division of Forestry EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. The West % of the Northeast '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest %4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, less the South 30 feet thereof for road right -of -way purposes, Collier County, Florida. 00?, 3 008000q '# yr; 2. The East % of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest %4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, less the South 30 feet thereof for road right -of -way purposes, Collier County, Florida. 0033 o/z oov3 # 4l 3. The West %z of the Southeast '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, less the North 30 feet for road right -of -way purposes, said land lying and being in Collier County, Florida. 0D3 Z 676 000% -# 9S 4. The Northeast '/4 of the Southwest %4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, less the South 30 feet for road right -of -way purposes, collier County, Florida. � p03z872000y #96 5. The, West %2 of the Southeast '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, less the North 30 feet thereof for road right -of -way purposes,-C�ollier County, Florida. 0033 /,7& 0006 i I7 6. The West %z of`the Southwest '/4 of the Southeast '/4 of the Northwest %4 of Section 29, Township 49 South,,' Range 27 East, less the North 30 feet thereof for road right -of -way purposes, Collier Count} Florida. Vv3321600o3 24- q8 qF /Vor 0, Qr��voV4 -F'r bans,,, —A/ 5v Nei L om,dteeL +i9r I-"dqt 0h, AMERICAN FARMS LLC EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. I13#00329440008 'ft 3 3 East '/2 of the Northeast Y4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 29, Township 49 south, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida 2. ID#0032Y920008 6� 3 East '/2 of the Southeast' /4 ofthe Northwest' /4 ofthe Northwest 1/4, subject to 30' easement of record along the North line of said property for road purposes, all lying and being in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Fl. 3. ID 400329520009 # 39 East '/Y of the Southeast '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest'/4 of the Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Fl. ID #00329160003 -j�t 3.7 East' /2 of the Northwest '/40f the Southwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Fl. N section 20 INEZRD KEANE AVE. I i L77 it ��Troved Fnr 1 rahsw'�fal J Sv /vv i Id330N20003 ID/830080004 1M2sf40008 IDe329480000 109330660003 AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS LEASED SINCE 1001 LEASED SINCE 1901 ACQUIRED 10/94 .ri y I k NC 'k 3 3 AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS ACQUIREDWZW ACQUIRm6N2103 ID03aJOES 09 32US0006 IDB 3*1120006 AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS ACQUIRED 195 LEASED SINCE 1991 ACQUIRED 9196 it 31 GIs AMERICAN FARMS }a 31. ACQUIREDW203 100326160003 1D82672 W M1 „,. AMERICAN FARMS AMERICAN FARMS ACQUIRED 11194 LEASED SINCE 1991 l 7 � AM� T�l A%R 2103 IDB 381760006 06 332180003 F AMERICAN FAR 991 SINCE 1 1 ARMS AM FARMS IRED 1073 ACQU w2w I i L77 it ��Troved Fnr 1 rahsw'�fal J Sv /vv i AMERICAN FARMS 55t ACRE PARCEL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT November 4, 2004 Introduction On September 29, 2004, Passarella and Associates, Inc. conducted an environmental assessment on the American Farms 55t Acre Parcel located in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). The assessment was prepared to address vegetation communities, jurisdictional wetlands, and listed species. Vegetation Communities The vegetation mapping for the subject property was conducted using 2004 rectified (scale I" _ 200') color aerials. Groundtruthing to map the vegetative communities was conducted on September 29, 2004 utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Level III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). AutoCAD (Version 2004) software was used to determine the acreage of each mapping area, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Figures 2 and 3). A total of eight vegetation associations (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the property. A summary of the vegetation communities identified by FLUCFCS code is as follows: Nursery (FLUCFCS Code 240) This upland land use occupies the majority of the site and contains no native habitat types. Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4119) This upland habitat has a canopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The sub -canopy is mostly open with scattered melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia), wax - myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and cabbage palm. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto (Serena repens) with rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), caesarweed (Urena lobata), and grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia). Pine (FLUCFCS Code 415) This upland habitat has a canopy that consists of slash pine. The sub -canopy includes slash pine and widely scattered cypress (Taxodium distichum). The ground cover includes scattered saw palmetto, cabbage palm, chocolateweed (Melochia corchorifolia), blackroot (Pterocaulon pycnostachyum), St. John's wort (Hypericum tetrapetalum), false pimpernel (Lindernia spp.), and grapevine. Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6219) This wetland habitat has a canopy consisting of cypress and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy includes swamp bay (Persea palustris), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), wax- myrtle, Passarella and Associates, Inc. 1 of 5 #04AFL 1186 11/04/04 Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and salt bush (Baccharis halimifolia). The ground cover includes swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), pickerelweed (Pontedaria cordata), gulfdune paspalum (Paspalum monostachyum), alligator flag (Thalia geniculata), and hempvine (Mikania scandens). Pine - Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6249) This wetland habitat has a canopy of slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy includes Brazilian pepper, swamp bay (Persea palustris), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and cabbage palm. The ground cover includes swamp fern, salt bush, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginiana), and Brazilian pepper. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6419) This wetland habitat has an open canopy with scattered cypress and cabbage palm. The sub - canopy includes Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and buttonbush. The ground cover includes maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), flatsedge (Cyperus haspan), swamp fern, inundated beaksedge (Rhynchospora inundata), alligator flag, salt bush, and pickerelweed. Disturbed Land, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401) This wetland land use has an open canopy and sub - canopy. The ground cover is mostly open with scattered dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), sesbania (Sesbania sp.), and maidencane. Spoil Area (FLUCFCS Code 743) This upland land use has an open canopy and sub - canopy. The ground cover is dominated by beggar's tick (Bidens pilosa) with scattered dogfennel, sesbania, and maidencane. Jurisdictional Wetlands The subject property was reviewed for both state and federal wetland jurisdiction using the "Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters" (Chapter 62 -340, Florida Administrative Code) and the Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (COE 1997). Approximately 10.37 acres of the property are potential state and federal jurisdictional wetlands. Potential wetland areas include areas mapped as Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6219); Pine - Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6249); Freshwater Marsh (FLUCFCS Code 6419); and Disturbed Land, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401). Wetland limits have not been verified by any agency. Based on review of the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Survey for Collier County (Soils Conservation Service 1998), the subject property contains one hydric soil type identified as Unit 18 - Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum (Figure 4). Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands require an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from the state and a Dredge and Fill Permit from the COE. ERP's are issued by either the Florida Department of Environmental Protection or the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) depending on the type and size of project. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 2 of 5 #04AFL1186 11/04/04 Listed Species A survey for listed species was conducted as part of this assessment. No state or federal listed species were observed on the subject property during the September 29, 2004 site inspection. The proximity of listed species to the project site as recorded by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) is provided as Figure 5. Listed wildlife species that were not observed but have the potential to occur on the undeveloped portion of the project site are listed in Table 1. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume I. Mammals (Humphrey 1992); Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992); Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 1. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur on the Undeveloped Portion of American Farms Property Sctehtilic Name' Cbm I itiiatne nated $tutus 73abitat (F} �q�#y Am `hibisus and Re tiles, Alli gator mississi iensis American alli ator SSC T S /A) 6419 Go herus oly hemus Go her tortoise SSC 4119 Rana ca ito Go her fro SSC 4119 Drymarchon corals couperi Eastern indigo snake I T 4119/415/6219/6249 / 6419 Birds E etta thula Sno a ret SSC 6219/6249/6419/7401 Endocumis albus White ibis SSC 6219/6249/6419/7401 Haliaeetus leucoce halos Bald ea le T T 4119 E retta caerulea Little blue heron SSC 6219/6249/6419/7401 A'aia a'a'a Roseate s oonbill SSC 6219/6249/6419/7401 Aramus uarauna Lim kin SSC 6219/6249/6419/7401 M cteria americana Wood stork E E 6219/6249/6419/7401 Picoides borealis Red - cockaded woodpecker T E 4119/415 Falco sparverius paulus Southeastern American kestrel T 4119/415 ''141ammals Sciurus ni er avicennia g Big Cypress fox squirrel T 4119/415/6219/ 6249 Ursus americanus ortdanus Black bear T 4119/415/6219/6249 Puma concolor co i Florida anther E E 4119/415/6219/6249 FWCC - Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service SSC - Species of Special Concern T - Threatened E - Endangered Passarella and Associates, Inc. 3 of 5 #04AFL1186 11/04/04 Per the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's July 23, 2002 draft survey protocol, a "diminishing quarters" survey was conducted to verify the site did not contain red - cockaded woodpecker cavity trees. The cavity tree survey was conducted by qualified ecologists walking east/west and north/south parallel transects spaced approximately 50 feet apart (Figure 6). No red - cockaded woodpecker cavities or start holes were observed within the survey area. No red - cockaded woodpeckers were seen or heard during the survey period. Listed plant species that were not observed but have the potential to occur on the undeveloped portion of the project site are listed in Table 2. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 2. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Undeveloped Portion of American Farms Property SeAfia3Hame it ;Co{op Name "ignated Status Hatirittrat ode C FDA.' USFWS - Enc Ilia tam ensis Butterfl orchid C 6219 Campyloneurum an usti odum Narrow strap fern E 6219 Tillandsia asciculata Stiff leaved wild pine E 6219 Burmannia ava Fakahatchee burmannia E 4119/415 C rto odium unctatum Cowhorn orchid E 6219/6249 Deeringothamnuspulchellus White- squirrel- banana; beautiful pawpaw E E 4119 Tillandsia ruinosa Fuzz -wuz air plant E 6219/6249 Zarnia oridana Florida coontie C 4119 FDA — Florida Department of Agriculture USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered C — Commercially Exploited Summary A total of eight vegetative associations and land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) have been identified on the American Farms 55t Acre Parcel. The subject parcel contains 42.69± acres of developed land identified as Nursery (FLUCFCS Code 240). Approximately 10.37 acres of remaining undeveloped land may be considered potential jurisdictional wetlands by the SFWMD and the COE. No state or federal listed species were observed on the subject property during the September 29, 2004 site inspection. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 4 of 5 #04AFL1186 11/04/04 REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550- 010 - 001 -a. Third Edition. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 1. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Moler, Paul E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Rodgers, J.A., H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith. 1996. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume V. Birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Soils Conservation Service. 1998. Soils Survey of Collier County Area, Florida U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y -87 -1. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 5 of 5 #04AFL1186 11/04/04 COLLIER COUNTY (IxIT W ?FO- � S i L PROJECT LOCATION SEC 29, TWP 49 S, RGE 27 E w PASSARELLA and ASSOCIATES INC FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP Consulting Ecologists AMERICAN FARMS -55t ACRE PARCEL DRAWN BY: P.F. DATE: 11/11/804 I W IT , I L E �tE 'r A` f k, Y". 1 `e �s LU � Lo n 2 4) ; �\ \. 4& )) )) $\ ! \4 |� } ƒ / \ } \ § \ \{ LU \\ o{ }![•\ \` kk §! �� =glt,ffkk 0 2 �� LL l� | || LU � Lo n 2 4) ; �\ \. 4& )) )) $\ ! \4 |� } ƒ / \ } \ § \ \{ LU \\ o{ }![•\ -� :rt - y �• v •. fX � ��'y {j ..Fli�l+r iL �i'^ ) . FC t �,.«... r .. 'All • x e ►""" fi q r . .. r � ) r, flo � !o � .'k „�f ..- T , 1 r r .. z * g r4r' 1 yi � .Jr O J Q w � U w a a w W U QN � yWgj o6 Z Q Z U c a m 9 w v �1 1.00 •, • • • co N • 1111 8 •I • • i�. • • 1 m i % F�y W wLL • , • R e`v ry y 9 u , : • vi ¢ o a o . U � • • . • gaYYwY Y�ss$[[�UTY Lll —� U r • a o r N = ON LL Z fn ,• "Y °� •[[ Q N (L w U c 3HH C ��� Y�FQY: Q N - €w m €W v k3P: m sw8 "�g to w Nwo u z° c 4 [[ O O Q w LL i w • • • i 1111•• • • Z ¢ Q m U U O • • , ••�•• _ •o 1111 Ir •�, • • •' , • 1111 • w 2 • a, . M• S••. •• 1111. Q :.. , 040 .1111• 1111. • • 00; • t 0110 • 1111 • U •, • • • co • 1111 • •I • • i�. • • 1 m • 1111 • • 11 11 • • .Ri wLL • , • V ry y , • • • *0 , : • vi ¢ o a o . U � • • . • 0 co .. o Co w , • ro �d �� 1111• co • —� U r • a o r - ,• W ��� • U m - €w m €W • adwdp O N � U 0 A10 • O • e `� a `3 a `3 • S a • 3 a k 1311100 • B w Wk Wk `X;I Y Y� 06 j ie AA . If t •5� .T `X;I 06 j ,. . No :a s 7�� 8y 1GC11'r� xi.0�` • Y q �. n^c�i" a 3 °� ,ir D {' `I'dly.,. ''T, br,%sii(.yr�.iu',�,'�Irpr i'� r• � ����? �" '.:l •r { .�J yl r. M 1�.,'c it � � . Y—M AL" N T�.r,'�1M•.'h�. l �G:rril �i4i.d� -iYl. .'�'"iA` i S J .WY1. ✓^ CdA6 •.•�„� E . �. 5 Y C �� + � r.'a fir✓ '..: " T7��Yw.. . 4 a � - Q w 1J ♦'4trd ... 5,e1+ , i ,fir i''7.' S � ^� . - � '', �• {b i 4P i �.. f y � - 4t j4, �i+ ✓ ic1 �j _, � +...i � r � f sTt�- � •♦1`]�/[ J1. i✓1 y jrr 5} 1"Y f' 1F'J' +t Ir j�> +�.,� Y ',i4! +1..'7,►.. +J i+`.�f 'fxY i .1'� +ii,���1 .l' j'Y' Sl�i �'9s^ _ Li'> ♦ � x� t s t� ! 2 � Y PASSARELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 9110 College Pointe Court Fort Myers, FL 33919 Phone(239)274 -0067 Fax(239)274 -0069 November 5, 2004 Mr. David Weeks Chief Planner Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: FLUM Amendment Gargiulo Trust Property Project No. 97WAI152 Dear Mr. Weeks I //,+p 5(f52 By letter dated November 6, 2003, your department notified landowners regarding the opportunity to submit additional data and analysis to the county in an attempt to demonstrate a properties designation should be changed from Sending Lands to Receiving Lands. Garguilo Trust Property wishes to be included in the county's upcoming 2005 Cycle 1 Growth Management Plan Amendments. Please find enclosed supporting environmental documents for your review in considering the redesignation of lands located on the Garguilo Trust Property. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Bob Mulhere of RWA, Inc. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, PASSARELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. a-h Andrew Woo ruff Senior Ecologist AW /mh Enclosures cc: Don Barber, w /enclosures Bob Mulhere, w /enclosures RECEIVED PASSARELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Ecologists 9110 College Pointe Court Fort Myers, FL 33919 Phone (239) 274 -0067 Fax(239)274 -0069 May 11, 2005 Mr. Stan Litsinger, AICP Collier County Government Community Development and Environmental Services Division Comprehensive Planning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Gargiulo Properties Project No. 97WAI152 Folio No. 00209280003, 00 1 1 3400005 Dear Mr. Litsinger: In response to your letter dated April 13, 2005, please find enclosed a notarized Letter of Authorization from Jeffrey Gargiulo verifying that I am authorized to represent the landowner in matters related to the Garguilo Properties Growth Management Plan Amendment. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, S ,ARELLA ND ASSOCIATES, INC. Andrew Woo ff Vice President AW /mh Enclosure cc: Don Barber, w /enclosure Jeffrey Gargiulo, w /enclosure Bob Mulhere, w /enclosure Rpr 27 2005 8:56RM HP LRSERJET 3200 p.5 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize ANi)RL7w Wn2peuFF (Name of Agent — typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Sk TrW Jeffrey D. Gargiulo, as Trustee Date: (Name of Owner(s) of Record) I hereby certify that 1 have the authority to make the foregoing application, and !hat the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge, Signature 01 \App cant Tt�FRt � -�. EsH2lsi•U(�y Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn t� n�u�crib =creme �A/d day of i!%�Y 20� (Notary Public) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: _ who is personally known to me, who has produced and as identification 2A�RLD�*KR. HAWR IM did take an Oath ; if0�m did not take an Oath dq„yo loe AnpraNri CouMY NOTICE —BE AWARE THAT: SMCemn•EJr127.200s Florida Statute Sectlon 837.06 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the Intent to mislead a public servant In the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 02/2002 FLUCFCS AND LISTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED SENDING/RECEIVING BOUNDARY FOR THE GARGIULO TRUST PROPERTY November 5, 2004 Introduction On October 19, 2004 and November 2, 2004, Passarella and Associates, Inc. conducted an environmental assessment on a part of the Gargiulo Trust (BCB Sod Farm) 619.94± acre parcel located in Section 34, Township 47 South, Range 27 East; and Section 3, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). This assessment was prepared to address vegetation communities, listed species, and historical and archaeological resources within areas proposed for redesignation as receiving lands (Figure 2). Vegetation Communities The vegetation mapping for the subject area was conducted using 2004 rectified (scale 1" = 400') color aerials. Groundtruthing to map the vegetative communities was conducted on October 19, 2004 and November 2, 2004 utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Level III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). AutoCAD (Version 2004) software was used to determine the acreage of each mapping area, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS Detail of Proposed Sending /Receiving Boundary Map (Figure 2). A total of seven vegetation associations (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified within the areas proposed for redesignation as receiving lands. A summary of the vegetation communities identified by FLUCFCS code are as follows: Sod Farm (FLUCFCS Code 242) This agricultural area is actively being farmed for sod. Inactive Farm Field (FLUCFCS Code 261) This agricultural area has been used for the production of row crops but is currently inactive. Ground cover vegetation includes dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), broomsedge (Andropogon sp.), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), flatsedge (Cyperus sp.), and torpedograss (Panicum repens). Pine, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) (76 100% Exotics) This disturbed upland habitat is vegetated by a scattered canopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and red maple (Ater rubrum). The sub - canopy consists of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), cabbage palm, and wax -myrtle (Myrica cerifera). The ground cover includes Brazilian pepper and muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia). Brazilian pepper occupies greater than 75 percent of this area. rassarelia and Associates, Inc. 1 of 5 #97 WAI152 11/05/04 Brazilian Pepper (FLUCFCS Code 422) This disturbed upland habitat is vegetated by a canopy of Brazilian pepper with scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana) and slash pine. The sub -canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper with scattered wax -myrtle and primrose willow. The ground cover is open with muscadine grape and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli). Brazilian pepper occupies greater than 75 percent of this area. Ditch (FLUCFCS Code 514) This other surface water area is predominantly open water with scattered Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), Brazilian pepper, and primrose ,willow. The herbaceous cover includes water pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellate), Asiatic pennywort (Centella asiatica), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), and paragrass (Urochloa muticans). Reservoir (FLUCFCS Code 530) This agricultural reservoir is vegetated by scattered Brazilian pepper and Carolina willow. The ground cover includes torpedograss, water pennywort, cattail (Typha sp.), and primrose willow. Berm (FLUCFCS Code 747) This disturbed upland habitat is vegetated by a canopy that includes slash pine, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), live oak, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy includes Brazilian pepper, wax - myrtle, and scattered Carolina willow. The ground cover includes Spanish needles (Bidens pilosa), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), caesarweed (Urena lobata), virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), swamp flatsedge (Cyperus ligularis), primrose willow, and muscadine grape. Listed Species A survey for listed species was conducted within areas proposed for redesignation as receiving lands on October 19, 2004 and November 2, 2004. Three state listed species were observed during the survey conducted on October 19, 2004. The little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor), and American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) were observed in the Ditch (FLUCFCS Code 514) and Reservoir (FLUCFCS Code 530) habitats. The proximity of listed species to the project site as recorded by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is provided as Figure 3. Listed wildlife species that have the potential to occur in areas proposed for redesignation from sending to receiving are listed in Table 1. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume I. Mammals (Humphrey 1992); Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992); Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 2 of 5 497WAII52 11/05/04 Table 1. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur in the Area Proposed for Redesignation as Receiving Land Scientific Name Common Name Dest ` ated Status,. , $abif}4" " `(FLUCRCS Codg) 1FWCC USFWS Amphibians and Reptiles Alligator mississip iensis American alligator SSC T (S /A) 514/530 Gopherus oly hemus Gopher tortoise SSC E 747 Rana ca ito Gopher frog SSC 747 Drymarchon corais cou eri Eastern indigo snake T T 261/4159/747 Birds Egretta thula Snowy egret SSC - 261/514/530 Endocumis albus White ibis SSC - 261/514/530 Egretta caerulea Little blue heron SSC - 261/514/530 Egretta tricolor Tricolored heron SSC 261/514/530 A"aiaa"aja Roseate spoonbill SSC - 261/514/530 Aramus guarauna Lim kin SSC - 261/514/530 Mycteria americana Wood stork E E 261/514/530 Mammals Ursus americanus floridanus Black bear T 261 Puma concolor coryi Florida panther E E 261 Mustela vison ever ladensis Everglades Mink T 514/530 FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service SSC — Species of Special Concern T — Threatened E — Endangered Listed plant species that were not observed but have the potential to occur in areas proposed for redesignation from sending to receiving are listed in Table 2. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 2. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur in the Area Proposed for Redesignation as Receiving Land FDA — Florida Department of Agriculture Passarella and Associates, Inc. 3 of 5 #97WAI152 11/05/04 Designated boat Scientific Name Common Name Stalus (FLJGUFCyS FDA USFWS Tillandsia fasciculata Stiff leaved wild pine E I - 4159 FDA — Florida Department of Agriculture Passarella and Associates, Inc. 3 of 5 #97WAI152 11/05/04 USFWS —U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered Historical and Archaeological Resources A letter was received from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources dated June 17, 1998. This letter stated that "no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the project area ". A copy of the letter is attached. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 4 of 5 #97WAI152 11/05/04 REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550- 010 -001 -a. Third Edition. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 1. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Moler, Paul E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Rodgers, J.A., H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith. 1996. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume V. Birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Passarella and Associates, Inc. 5 of 5 #97WAI152 11/05/04 BEACH RD } Z Z3 O V W W J FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP GARGIULO TRUST F- Z ZD O V_ c L1J J J O v rr 7Q O c S I RD SEC 34, TWP 47 S, RGE =SEC 3, TWP 48 S, RGE PASSARELLA and ASSOCIATES INC Consulting Ecologists DRAWN BY: D.B. DATE: 11/05/04 6 Z O rc a aaLL rca ��° Z W 2 LL O Z N F r�rll /n 3�3$ a�Q gwo ,N O w vwi �+O soz aog� VJ "> a�W`" pox a Q', •r, a Zao w' w P:Z Z OJOO NJ6 OU V w wm �m ��N gay dLL O ti O 224a 2 Q F Q O LL_ J LL V V 'mil O 3 U s 0 O a N 1b, IO N �t�yJ. O CI pO O F +! +1 +I +I+1 +I +1 aaaaaaaa �,. (J O N .- __ ^lvoT a 77 m U_ a a W Z Q w 0 6 _ a Z } Q m mm a w Y =1 m oU m 0 N ` Z 0zm�0w w msmow U a w � twiw 300��� Q6 O LL U N v v N iIS n Z L_ Z - w F de O YI N O_ ` W W +I +1 +I +I In <¢ < << 0- iy a d O p w J .. y w N ix G� a Q� k N LL 1' Q R O_ O g QF J FN. w z o m U 0 .•�aY w no It U e n `R C uU inn �j \�/ w • m � (7 4 §G§ §)) \ t ) §0 0 ■ G \� +e. ■j@ � '■ ¥ 8 ( |! | || r •! ! ;„ ; ) § ®i) )p)§» a ma FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Office of the Secretary Office of International Relations Division of Administrative Services Division of Corporations Division of Cultural Affairs June 17, 1998 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Sandra B. Mortham Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Andrew Woodruff Passarella and Associates, Inc. 4575 Via Royale, Suite 104 Fort Myers, Florida 33919 RE: Cultural Resource Assessment Request USACOE Nationwide Permit Application BCB Farms Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Woodruff. MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA CABINET Division of Library & Information Services Division of Historical Resources Ringling Museum of Art Division of Licensing Division of Elections In Reply Refer To: Frank J. Keel Historic Preservation Planner Project File No. 983811 In accordance with the procedures contained in 36 C.F.R., Part 800 ( "Protection of Historic Properties "), we have reviewed the referenced project(s) for possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. The authority for this procedure is the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89 -665), as amended. A review of the Florida Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the project area. Furthermore, because of the project location and /or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project will have no effect on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Your interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated. mR 11 Sincerely, C/'Lt�r�✓[.1�.. Q /LILGLI/,rir'v�(��L� George W. Percy, Director Division of Historical Resources and State Historic Preservation Officer DIRECTOR'S OFFICE R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 • (850) 488 -1480 FAX: (850) 488 -3353 • WWW Address http: / /www.dos. state.fl.us O ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION O HISTORICAL MUSEUMS (850) 487 -2299 • FAX: 414 -2207 (850) 487 -2333 • FAX: 922 -0496 (850)488 -1484 • FAX 991 -91nz T 41 1 38 1 4 � e t � N� ! r r , 96.�a, 96 . Sk1 ! r r , 96.�a, I F t Tut _ -...I 12 - 1. �49 1 -12— 49 e ;< °I w� �0 IIiRFMUQI� w "'. ] B a9 26i 9 49 9 Approved Re,designationl of ' .� 14 49 13 49 �2)3 1P 9 2] 21 23.. 24 a g 491 49 49 41i # u x3 24 8 19 26 2a 26 i 61 1 21 ri `'�/ 27 49 49 49 2] 1 29 36 o L: 217 1 .5 26 25 49 49�I I. 3p 49 3] 29 iF 27 26 25 3U 15, 26 Z6 P 49 a a9 27 49 49 20 27 27 49 I. '5 a 9 1 3 49 l 32 49 I 33 9 l 6 35 36 61 21 28 26 Z] 27 21 40 I 49 49 I I I I 9 39 5a' S9 29 fi 59 2] 4 Su 2 2 59 6 21 5 $0 27 1 27 27 20 2] 19i 11 ED ] 8 9 I 19 S0 p1, 26 28 2l 27 Z] 27 Z] 5➢ E 2] 17 2] 50 2If l4 j P `50 18 15 4 Tf IH 50 50' 261 fi0 26 26 27 27 5D 27 59 20 1 n 57 I 20 221 21 24 t9 29 21 1 1 22 23 9 0 2fi W 2 22 W 17 SI s 26 n n 24 26 1 1 I I so n ill 26 25 30 29 0 50 26 2] 26 25 3V 0 6 so 26 5a 26 n 27 i 50 27 50 27 66 so 50 i n 17 2tl >s 36 31 32 93 34 35 36 31 10 56 W 59 50 I, `20 - 50 50 50 2t: 26 27 2]n I 27 P P 2P f 1 a .1 2 SI 26 M eta .yL 2] 2] J11 r i a 11 12 ] a y aiQ 11 , s1 ei §1 ai dl 51 61 21 z6 P ,e,4P .ri v 12 1 n I >a ,1 Is 1 a fie.. 1 t 1tl .^ 14 III In 51 51 51 11, 26 16 27 Y: z 27 21 20 ®APPPOVED REDE6I GNATION -- I GERA II� NEUTRAL 19 51 20 51 54 23 51 14 51 51 21 RECEIVING n qa. .T n x] zr 20 6 SENDING — 27 ' >s 10 29 "1 2] 2!2 Lh J0 51 51 9Y Cbf. ll.AP Magane O —ll 51 11 51 51 5i 1 MiF1LM1d1eYlBb erElPlern�nNrvN VdlkelPYnlRbgeSMIl611, 1A ..VFGI W.W WN.1 1] Ti 21 2U RFMUD Legend Approved Redesignation of Sending Lands NRPA I APPROVED REDESIGNATION NEUTRAL - RECEIVING SENDING I a , I I 2 I 91 w it m n I I `, q M 1 I y 1 I I I ul I inI N n yyN� b tJ f r L a I �I A vu, veencry aD I �I Ge. Fr MrgryNNlemm� ODES y15K4D Myp 9DFWM�1 W.FSWveFXnp NO]511.1]MRNDVED3 m,O Deb'. E¢II�6O] -, -.- Item VI.E ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7.2007 I. NAME OF PETITIONER /PROJECT: Petition No.: CPSP- 2005 -15 Petition Name: THOROUGHFARE CORRIDOR PROTECTION PLANS Applicant: Nick Casalanguida, Director Collier County Transportation Planning Dept. II. LOCATION: The proposed Growth Management Plan amendment is not specific to a certain location. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed text change seeks to amend the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to establish thoroughfare corridor protection and preservation planning, through related plans, maps, tables and ordinances, as follows: [Note: Current Transportation Element language appears below in plain text, the petitioners proposed amendments are shown in strike - through /underline format.] Proposed Transportation Element Text Amendment: OBJECTIVE 3: [page 13] The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right -of -ways. [Note: No revisions to Policies 3.1 through 3.4 are proposed.] Policy 3.5 that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan: and 2. adopt Corridor Preservation Maps, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical 3. limit the uses of land within the required corridor: and 4. provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables: and EAC Meeting of November 7, 2007 CPSP- 2005 -15 I Page 2 of 6 provide for an approval Process by the Board of Countv Commissioners for new For the purposes of this Policy Protected thoroughfares shall include• 1. 2. 3. 4. Policy 3.6 the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no Protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to Proposed grade separated intersections. In the event of any type of right -of -way acquisition or reservation for all purposes included for commissioners Tor interpretation and approval This proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment does not involve adopting the Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan, a Transportation Corridor Preservation Map, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical Intersection Tables or Ordinances, themselves. This GMPA does however, establish the means for preparing, adopting and updating these items consistent with Florida Statutes, as separate documents at later dates. IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY. Transportation Element: The Transportation Element goal to "plan for, develop and operate a safe, efficient, and cost effective transportation system that provides for both the motorized and non - motorized movement of people and goods throughout the County" is followed by the working objective to "provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of- way ". G:1Ca WMhK4W Cony. PlmNna GMP DATAWornp. Ran Amendmen1a12W5 Pe5Em61Cp5p- 2W5.15 FLUE -TE C—dm Robcaon geivuWPSP4)5 -15 EAC SLO RIW- Adoptlmd, EAC Meeting of November 7, 2007 Page 3 of 6 CPSP- 2005 -15 Policy 3.1 indicates that the County has "implemented [and maintains] an advanced Right -of -Way Preservation and Acquisition Program ". The proposed amendments for additional Policies in the Transportation Element furthet these efforts by identifying the corridors where rights -of -way and roadways will eventually be located, in accordance with a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP). V. MAJOR ISSUES: The Comprehensive Planning staff has no major issues concerning CPSP- 2005 -15. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issued their Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on October 8, 2007, in which an Objection was raised, stating, "[t]his policy does not establish meaningful and predictable standards to guide the selection and acquisition of future transportation corridors in environmentally sensitive areas. It does not ensure the protection of natural resources which is inconsistent with the state requirement to appropriately plan for the location of land uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat." The DCA followed these statements with a Recommendation to, "[r]evise Policy 3.6 to establish meaningful predictable guidelines and standards to be implemented during the acquisition of the _ right -of -way, and ensuring that the standards for the protection of natural resources are not compromised in the process of right -of -way acquisition." Please see the attached ORC Report (cover letter and pages 2 and 3). The DCA separately indicated their findings regarding the amendment's Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan, stating, "[t]he proposed amendment does not adequately address and further the State Comprehensive Plan including the following goals and policies (163.3177(9)): Natural Systems and Recreational Lands Goal (9) (a), Policy 1, 3., 4., regarding the protection of wildlife habitat (see objections above); Land Use Goal (15)(a) and Policy (b)6., regarding the regulation of land uses (see objections above)" The DCA followed these statements with a Recommendation to, "[t]evise the proposed amendment, as indicated in the objections and recommendations of this report, in order to be consistent with the goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan." Please see the attached ORC Report (cover letter and pages 2 and 3). The Comprehensive Planning staff and Transportation Planning staff have considered the Department of Community Affairs' Objections and Recommendations and revised CPSP- 2005 -15 accordingly. Revisions have been made to clarify Policy 3.6 to indicate that the language applies only to the expansion of existing facilities. Currently, when a transportation entity expands existing facilities they are at times making the remaining land nonconforming. The issue can have ramifications to the property owner and can increase the cost and hardship to both the property owner and the entity expanding the facility. G.T4MmhwWo CDnp. Planning GMP DATM1 W. Plan ftaftb1M P@1Wm CPSP- 2DD615 FLUE -TE CWd%Pf*WD PlwinglCPSP -0515 EAC S1aRRepd1- AEDptlonAw EAC Meeting of November 7, 2007 CPSP - 2005 -15 Page 4 of6 Revisions have also been made to Policy 3.5 and 3.6 to provide additional language assuring the new provisions are consistent with the State requirement to appropriately plan for the location of land uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat. Together these clarifications should alleviate the concerns of DCA as they are written to eliminate the possibility that existing and future facilities will not adequately address the concerns addressed in the ORC Report. [Note: Current Transportation Element language appears below in plain text, the proposed amendments as transmitted to DCA are shown in single strike - through /underline format, and the proposed amendments responding to the ORC Report are shown in double strike - through /underline format. Proposed Transportation Element Text Amendment: [page 13] OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right -of -ways. [Note: No revisions to Policies 3.1 through 3.4 are proposed.] Policy 3.5 that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables: and Provide Tor an approval process by the Board of County Commissioners for new means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas For the purposes of this Policy protected thoroughfares shall include• 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway: or 2. required corridors for roadway o_r alternative transportation networks for whirh 3. GlCwWhenwwr,ortp. Plwiip GMP DATAICanp. Plan M ndnenRM5 PeWWCPSP- 100S15 FLUE- TE.C=" Piolepfion PWep n9zPSP -0515 EAC SW Nepw -Adop b .Ex EAC Meeting of November 7, 2007 CPSP - 2005 -15 4. Page S of 6 All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02 of the Florida Statues. Policy 3.6 In the event of any type of riaht -of -way acquisition or reservation for all purposes included inihe riaht -of -way acquisition or reservation may be reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the requirements of the Growth Management Plan must be brought to the Board of County Commissioners for interpretation and approval. If an Objection is not adequately addressed when adopted, then the DCA may (presumably will) find the amendment to be "Not in Compliance" with Florida Statutes, and issue a Notice of Intent (NOI) to indicate such noncompliance. VI. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Comprehensive Planning staff and Transportation Planning staff have collaborated to address the Objections raised by the Department of Community Affairs and follow its Recommendations. Staff believes the above - recommended revisions are appropriate and satisfactory responses to the ORC Report and recommends approval of CPSP- 2005 -15 as revised above. G\C -re* ZOM.RvAnp GMPDATATC #Ptw Amn&nems1m PdkMZPSP.200&15 FLUE -TE COMM PM Pl nlr4CPSMS -15 PAC Staff Neat- Adopbon.da EAC Meeting of November 7, 2007 CPSP- 2005 -15 PREPARED BY: REVIEWED I,BY: 4 b"C". AL PLANNER U D TEf Page 6 of 6 DAVID C.WEEKS, AICP DATE COMPREHENSIVE P NING DEPARTMENT, PLANNING MANAGER u RANDALL CO N, AICP DATE COMPREHENSIVE PI- 4NNING DEPARTMENT, DIRECTOR �7 WILLIAM D. 1- REN , Jr., P.E. DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, DIRECTOR Appro d as to form ap legal sufficiency 10 j_ D TE Jeff idbl, Assistant County Attorney APPROVED BY: id a t o7 J SEPH K. SCHMITT DA OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR Petition No.: CPSP - 2005 -15 C: SUSAN ESTENES, AICP, ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR G:%Con mhemwerAm. Flaming GMP DATA1CO . Plan Amenbnenb=UPM sICPSP.20U615FLL6TEConift Prgec6on Plan PSP -MISW Still Repot- AJap6mn AN ._,,. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST THOMAS G. PELHAM Governor Secretary October 8, 2007 The Honorable James Coletta Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Coletta: The Department has completed the review of the proposed amendment to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan (DCA No. 07 -2), which was received on August 7, 2007. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (FS), we have prepared the attached report that outlines our findings concerning the amendment. It is important that the County address the issues set forth in our review report so that they can be resolved prior to adoption. Within the next 60 days, the County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed Amendment (DCA No. 07 -2) involves several changes to the comprehensive plan. The Department is concerned about Amendment CPSP- 2005 -14 involving changes to the Sending Lands designation of the adopted Future Land Use Map as well as the changes to the Transportation Element. The Department is committed to working closely with the County in responding to our Report. We will continue our collaborative efforts to ensure that the final product is one that can serve the best interest of the County while addressing the requirements of State Law. Please, feel free to call Bernard O. Piawah at 850- 922 -1810, if you have any questions. Yours sincerely, Mike McDaniel Chief, Comprehensive Planning MM/bp Enclosures: Review Agency Comments cc: Mr. David Crawford, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 -2100 Phone: 850- 488 - 8466 /SUNCOM 278 -8466 Fax: 850 -921- 0781 1SUNCOM 291 -0781 Website: www.dcj.5tatp.fI.us COMMUNITY PUNNING AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Pho :85048 &2356 /SUNCOM 27 &2356 Phone: 3054842402 Phone: 850488- 79566UNCOM 27 &7956 fix: 850-48 8,33095UNCOM 27 8-3309 F. 305- 289-2442 Fu: 850.922 -5623 UNCOM 292 -5623 Mr. Randy Cohen, Collier County Planning Department. TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, Collier County has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine not to adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan is outlined in Section 163.3184, F.S., and Rule 9J- 11.011, F.A.C. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, Collier County must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the plan, and pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted plan directly to the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. Please, be advised that the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted amendment. As discussed in our letter sent to you on May 25, 2001, outlining the changes to Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., which were effective July 1, 2001, and providing a model sign -in information sheet, please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted plan for compliance review. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR COLLIER COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 07 -2 October 8, 2007 Division of Community Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, F.A.C. INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the Collier County proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. The objections include a recommendation of an approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. The County should address each of these objections when the plan is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections that are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items that the County considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement, justifying its non - applicability, pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non - applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments that follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non - compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: 07 -2 COLLIER COUNTY I. CONSISTENCY WITH RULE 9J -5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C), & CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES (F.S.) Introduction: Collier County's proposed Amendment (DCA No. 07 -2) involves changes to the Future Land Use Map and the text of the Future Land Use and Transportation Elements. The Department has identified the following objections the amendments. OBJECTIONS 1. CPSP- 2005 -14: Change From Sending Lands to Receiving Lands and Neutral Lands Parcels #3 to #10: The County is proposing to re- designate some properties located in North Bellle Meade (Parcels #3 to #10 in the County's list) from Sending Lands to Neutral Lands. The amendment would allow encroachment of development into an area that provides habitat for a variety of wildlife, including the Florida Black Bear and Florida Panther. That encroachment would compromise the environmental integrity and values of the North Belle Meade (NBM) Sending lands. These lands have the same environmental attributes as the other NBM Sending lands; to approve a change from Sending Land designation to Neutral Land designation would jeopardize the preservation of this area as a wildlife habitat. Parcels 36 -41, 95 and 96: The County is proposing to re- designate these parcels from Sending Land designation to Receiving Land designation. According to the information provided, the northern 42.69 -acres of the subject site are developed, and the southern 1037 -acres are undeveloped, densely vegetated, and contain jurisdictional wetlands. While the northern 42.69 -acres that is already developed, may not support wildlife, the southern portion of the property is still undeveloped and has intact native vegetation which has the potential to support wildlife. The southern portion of the property has the same characteristics as the properties on the west, east and south of the site that are also designated Sending Lands. Although, endangered species were not found on the site, according to the information provided, these species have the potential to locate on the site. Florida panthers and Black bear telemetry information provided show that these mammals have been located in the vicinity of the site. In light of this information, the designation of this property as Sending Lands especially in the case of the southern portion was appropriate. No information has been provided to refute the Sending Land designation in the case of the southern portion of the site. [Chapter 163.3177(6)(a), & (d), & (8), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J- 5.005(2)(a), (c); 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., & (3)(c)6., and 9J- 5.013(2)(c)3., 5, & 6., Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C)]. Recommendation: The Department recommends that the Sending Lands designation for Parcels #3 to #10 be retained because that site is a part of the general area with native vegetation and has the potential to support wildlife which is consistent with the intent of the Sending Lands designation. With respect to Parcels 36 -41, and 95 to 96 the Department recommends that the southern portion of the subject site be retained in Sending Land designation. 2. CPSP- 2005 -15: Transportation Element: The County is proposing to add Policies 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8 to the Transportation Element in order to preserve future transportation corridors. Policy 3.6 states: "In the event of any type of right -of -way acquisition or reservation for all purposes included for the construction of transportation facilities by any federal, state, or local transportation department, authority, or agency the requirement for buffering, native vegetation retention, preserve, setback, and open space and/or any other requirements set forth in the Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code that would be affected by such right -of -way acquisition or reservation maybe reduced, modified or eliminated as a result of the acquisition or protection activities." This policy does not establish meaningful and predictable standards to guide the selection and acquisition of future transportation corridors in environmentally sensitive areas. It does not ensure the protection of natural resources which is inconsistent with the state requirement to appropriately plan for the location of uses in order to ensure the protection of natural resources, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources such as wetlands and wildlife habitat. [Chapter 163.3177(6)(a), (b), & (d), & (8), F.S.; Rule 9J- 5.005(6); 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., & (3)(c)6., and 9J- 5.013(2)(c) 6., F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise Policy 3.6 to establish meaningful predictable guidelines and standards to be implemented during the acquisition of right -of- way, and ensuring that the standards for the protection of natural resources are not compromised in the process of right -of -way acquisition. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendment does not adequately address and further the State Comprehensive Plan including the following goals and policies (163.3177(9):) 2 Natural Systems and Recreational Lands Goal (9)(a), Policy 1, 3., 4., regarding the protection of wildlife habitat (see objections above); Land Use Goal (15)(a) and Policy (b)6., regarding the regulation of land uses (see objections above); Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendment, as indicated in the objections and recommendations of this report, in order to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. Agenda Item 4P CiO fte,-r C "14- 'lty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2007 RE: PETITION NO. CPSP- 2005 -15, THOROUGHFARE CORRIDOR PROTECTION PLANS GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT /APPLICANT: Agent: Nick Casalanguida, Planning Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Services 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant: Don Scott, Director of Transportation Planning Services Collier County Transportation Services 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The proposed Growth Management Plan amendment is not specific to a certain location. REQUESTED ACTION: The proposed text change seeks to amend the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to establish thoroughfare corridor protection and preservation planning, through related plans, maps, tables and ordinances, as follows: [Note: Current Transportation Element language appears below in plain text, the petitioner's proposed amendments are shown in strike - through /underline format.] -1- Agenda Item 4P Proposed Transportation Element Text Amendment: [page 13] OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition and future right -of -ways. Policy 3.5 that: [Note: No revisions to Policies 3.1 through 3.4 are proposed.] 1. identifies, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway 2. 3. 4. 5. 91 Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables: and limit the uses of land within the required corridor; and provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables: and other means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas For the purposes of this Policy, protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or 2. required corridors for roadwav or alternative transportation networks for 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies; or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to proposed grade separated intersections All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02 of the Florida Statues Policy 3.6 department authority, or agency, the requirements for buffering native vegetation retention, or protection activities. Such reductions, modifications or eliminations shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Any modifications or reductions that conflict with any other -2- Agenda Item 4P This proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment does not involve adopting the Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan, a Transportation Corridor Preservation Map, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical Intersection Tables or Ordinances, themselves. This GMPA does however, establish the means for preparing, adopting and updating these items consistent with Florida Statutes, as separate documents at later dates. STAFF ANALYSIS: Transportation Element: The Transportation Element goal to "plan for, develop and operate a safe, efficient, and cost effective transportation system that provides for both the motorized and non - motorized movement of people and goods throughout the County' is followed by the working objective to "provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of- way". Policy 3.1 indicates that the County has "implemented [and maintains] an advanced Right -of- Way Preservation and Acquisition Program ". The proposed amendments for additional Policies in the Transportation Element further these efforts by identifying the corridors where rights -of- way and roadways will eventually be located, in accordance with a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP). Neighborhood Information Meeting: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is not required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F for Growth Management Plan amendments which are not site specific. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward Petition CPSP- 2005 -15 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Florida Department of Community of Affairs. -3- Agenda Item 4P Prepared By: Date: Corby L. Sc midt, Principal Planner Comprehen ive Plarnniing Department Reviewed By: G - IN ✓tl Date: 2 — LO 7 David C. Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: Ra /enAI—CPDirector Date: Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By:-42 d71• ��- Date: 2 ' z' M rjo ' Student- Stirling Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney Approved By Date: W"11, J eph K. Schmitt, Ad ministrator mmunity Development and Environmental Services Division PETITION NO.: CPSP- 2005 -15 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007 CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007 BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, Chairman APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER CPS°- aooS —IS DATERECEIVED 1d-1S Ofo PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT 11 r1 PLANNER ASSIGNED: �.hrvlic�� YrinraA� Q�annor COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (941 )403 -2300; Fax: (941)643- 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941 -403 -2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Company Mailing Address o�Y�_c��}kk� ttD��S)nd{' MuQ City State -FL. Zip Cod 4 Phone Numb r'daft 77�E-�ciLc�a Fax Numb Q -]7q- . 3;U r\- B. Name of Agent* * THIS WILL BE PERSON CONTACT FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. t _ Company /Firm C i t4dr '����.kn �n l6clVleQlf4y"I 'QK `ef(ac eg Mailin(g�Address a��� ` �r F? Nd f'l1h /P/ City 1 q s. —State -Zip Code _4(o4 02/2002 Phone Numbdr2?RI -] -14 - Email Address _� C. Name of Owner(s) of Mailing Address City Phone Number Fax Numbe & - N�� G) C Al i ar c{aV v)ek. Fax Number Zip Code D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address f^ ` Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and I ffice Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 02/2002 D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address N h G. Date subject property acquired () leased (): Terms of leasers /mos. NIf Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 1� 02/2002 III. DESCRIPTOIN OF PROPERTY I A. Legal Description B. Section: C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) D. General Location E. Planning Community G. Size in Acres Township: Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) IV. TYPE OF REQUEST Range: F. TAZ H. Zoning A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: Future Land Use Immokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage Golden Gate Area Master Plan Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) [ 3 of the 4d 1,k Element As Follows: ( Use Gress threughs to identify langudge to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, Subdistrict TO: District, Subdistrict [If new District and /or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) 4 02/2002 E. Describe additional changes requested: i V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8 % x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE T- general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject ��� property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS 1 n 11V THE LAND USE AERRAL IN "A" ABOVE. V 2. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). 3. Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. D. GROWTH MANAGMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference gJ- 11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. y` 1 2. Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. Is the proposed amendment directly related tot a proposed Small 02/2002 Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district/subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) Potable Water b) Sanitary Sewer c) Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS d) Drainage e) Solid Waste f) Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services). 4. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. 02/2002 F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 2. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 3. Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable 4. Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable 5. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly) 4. Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. ✓ 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -1/2 x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 02/2002 MEMORANDUM From Collier County Transportation Services Division Nick Casala%uida, Plantung Manager Subject: Proposed amendments to the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Comments: Attached is a copy of the proposed amendments to the Transportation Element of GNP; Add new Policies 3.5; 3.6; 3.7 and 3.8 under Objective # 3. Existing: E. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON - MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. .......................................... ..............................1 OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right -of -ways. Policy 3.1: The County has implemented an advanced Right -of -Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. (111) Policy 3.2: The County includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element funding specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right -of -Way Acquisition Program. Studies shall be conducted periodically to identify the long range right -of way needs of the transportation system based on buildout. Following their, completion, the Transportation Administrator will present a program of funding in actions to protect and acquire needed right -of -way. (11)(111) Policy 3.3: The County shall acquire sufficient amount of right -of -way to facilitate no less than a cross section of (6) traffic lanes, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, and shoulder sufficient for pull offs and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right -of -way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build -out will be less than the standard. (III) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2002 -60 on November 19, 2002 (111) Policy 3.4: Collier County shall acquire rights -of -way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the BCC based upon recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Proposed Transportation Element Text Amendment: [page 13] OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition and future right -of -ways. [Note: No revisions to Policies 3.1 through 3.4 are proposed.] Policy 3.5 regulations that: 1. identifies, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway 2. 3. 4. 5. Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables; and limit the uses of land within the required corridor and b. provide a process for advanced reservation donation dedication or any For the purposes of this Policy, protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established; or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies; or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limitari to All of the above_ must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02 of the Florida Statues Policy 3.6 interpretation ang approval Item VI.F. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF November 7.2007 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: CPSP- 2005 -16 Petition Name: Amendment to Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map in the GMP (Comprehensive Plan Amendment initiated by the Collier County Pollution Control & Prevention Department) [Adoption hearing] Applicant: Collier County II. LOCATION: This petition does not pertain to a specific property. III. BACKGROUND and PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Objective 1 of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and subsequent policies, requires the County to maintain maps of potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from nearby development activities and other activities and conditions. Every two years, the County is to revise and update its three - dimensional computer models, based upon a variety of data, and revise wellfield maps, as necessary. These maps consist of a single map known as the Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map that is part of the GMP's Future Land Use Map series. Section 3.06.00 of the Land Development Code (LDC) contains `wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone maps," maps that are similar to, but with greater detail than, the map in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Similar to the GMP, the LDC section requires review of the wellfield maps, but on an annual basis. The biennial process in the GMP consists of updating the computer model, then, if warranted, revising the map in the Future Land Use Element. Subsequently, any affected map(s) in the LDC would need to be amended. Since the LDC includes regulatory provisions, it is important to amend the LDC map(s) as soon as possible after the GMP map has been amended. EAC Meeting 11/7/07 The attached 29 -page report provides the technical basis for the proposed map amendment. The proposed Wellfields map itself is located on page 5; the summary of map changes (affected wellfields) is identified on page 14. Also, attached is the existing Wellfields map. Due to constraints caused by the tremendous amount of staff time and effort needed for the EAR (Evaluation and Appraisal Report) -based GMP amendments, the most recent modeling update was not completed in time for the proposed model -based amendment to the FLUE map to be included for the Transmittal hearings on the 2005 cycle of GMP amendments (held February-July, 2007). Therefore, staff requested, and received, approval from the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to add this petition to the 2005 cycle of GMP amendment at the Adoption hearings. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issued their Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on October 8, 2007. Since this petition was not heard at Transmittal hearings, it was not sent to DCA for review so it is not (could not be) included in the ORC Report. Though there is always some level of risk in adopting an amendment without benefit of DCA's preliminary review after Transmittal hearings, staff does not believe the risk of a noncompliance finding to be significant given that the amendment is technical in nature — it is based upon the sound science of the computer modeling, which has previously been used to support such map amendments — and because such an amendment has no impact upon public infrastructure or surrounding properties (though properties newly added to a protection zone would be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny). IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: This is a proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map series. It is required to be periodically revised, as necessary, pursuant to Objective 1 of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element and subsequent policies, and Objective 3.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and subsequent policies. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the EAC recommend approval of petition CPSP- 2005 -16, proposed amendment to the Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map. 2 EAC Meeting 11/7/07 PREPARED BY: �4) z 5- David Weeks, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager Date Comprehensive Planning Department ffiv /o -z5 o7 Liam D. Lorenz, r., P.E., irector Date Environmental Services Department F.1U9 ZiI�1�1�7e� K. Schmitt, Administrator Ifate mity Development & Environmental Services Division EAC Staff Report CPSP -05 -16 FLUM Wellhead Protection - Adoption G1ComprehensivelComp. Planning GMP DATAIComp. Plan Amendments12005 PetitionskCPSP- 2005-16 FLUM Wellhead Protection Map dw/10 -25 -07 EXl STIN6 MAP IN i;mp COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS and PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs CARICA ROAD ASR a U COASTAL RIDGE WELLFIELD W SCALE 0 SN7. AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 Ord. No, 2003 -44 AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Ord. N. 2007 -18 CR 846 PROPOSED NORTHEAST REGIONAL IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD WATER TREATMENT PLANT ORANGETREE PHASE 1A WELLFIELD AREA WELLFIELD CR 858 / CR 846 ® ® ® EAST G GATE WELLFIELD G . BLVD 'NE COLLIER RIDGE COUNTY UTILITIES WELLFIELD N 1 75 FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT PLANT WELLFIELD n > m PROPOSED m U SOUTH HAWTHORN WELLFIELD EXTENSION w 0 Q w S w MANATEE F/ ROAD ASR K EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELLDD a v ®RELIABILITY WELLS i/S . (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) WELLFIELD AREA ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY DEPT. PREPARED BY GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENNRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION SOURCE: COLLIER COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL AND PREVENTON DATE 9 /2006 FILE: WFPZRI2- 2006.DWG 846 GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) Cow er < o7' 1 "ty PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION POLLUTION CONTROL & PREVENTION DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY WELLS MAP October 5, 2007 GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Well6eld Protection ReportOct Page I of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 - 16) TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY....................................................................... ............................... 3 APPENDIX A. HISTORICAL WELLFIELD PROTECTION MODELING IN COLLIER COUNTY ... 6 A.1 INITIATION OF MODELING IN 1989 ..................... ............................... 6 A.2 MODELING OF 2003 ........................................... ............................... 9 A.3 MODELING OF 2004 ............................................ ............................... 12 B. MODELING OF 2006 LEADING TO 2007 LDC AMENDMENT REQUEST ............ 13 B.1 STAKEHOLDERS ............................................... ............................... 13 B.2 METHODS ........................................................ ............................... 13 B.3 RESULTS .......................................................... ............................... 14 C. REFERENCES ............................................................ ............................... 15 D. TABLE OF OWNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE 2006 WELLFIELD PROTECTION ZONE MODELING .................................. ............................... 17 E. DETAILED WELLFIELD MODELING DATA ..................... ............................... 19 GMPpaper 057]00 Oct (2) - Wel#!eld Protection Repor[Oct Page 2 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) Summary The Pollution Control & Prevention Department of Collier County (PCD) is pursuing an amendment to the "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells (ASRs) Map" (Map 1), located within the Collier County Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element. A recent review and modeling of the municipal water supply wellfields within Collier County has indicated that the existing "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas, Proposed Wellfields and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells (ASRs) Map" is out dated. This proposed amendment will up date this map so it reflects what presently exists in Collier County. Through this process the public will be informed (Public Notices) and will have the opportunity to discuss their opinions and thoughts during public hearings held by the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council, the Collier County Planning Commission, and finally the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, where the proposed amendment will be considered for adoption. If this amendment is approved, it will then be forwarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review to determine compliance with Florida Statutes. Following this process the PCD will then pursue the amendment of the Collier County's Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.06.00 "Ground Water Protection" to ensure the outdated wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones are updated to reflect what presently exists. The purpose and intent of LDC Section 3.06.00 is to protect future and existing public water supply wellfields, protect natural aquifer system recharge areas, protect countywide ground water resources, and protect the public and resources from potential pollutant point sources. This regulation requires that the public water supply wellfields within the county are protected by means of "wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zones." These zones are derived from a three - dimensional computer- modeled analysis of ground water and solute transport in the county's freshwater aquifer system. This modeling has been done by the PCD since 1989. In addition, the LDC indicates that the special treatment zones shall be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis or as needed as a result of any significant changes that may occur within any of the wellfields. Following the initial setup of the model by a consultant in 1989, the model was run in 1991, 2003, 2004, and most recently in 2006. Each run of the model produced changes to the previous run results because of the new data input (i.e., wellfield changes that occurred since the previous run of the model). The current LDC wordage is based on the 2004 model simulations, while the proposed 2007 LDC amendment request reflects the results of the 2006 modeling. Similarly, the map currently contained in the Growth Management Plans' Future Land Use Element is based upon the 2004 model simulations; the proposed map shown as "Map 1" reflects the results of the 2006 modeling. There exist eight municipal water supply wellfields listed below. Three have been updated (Collier County Utilities Golden Gate Wellfield, Florida Governmental Utility Authority Golden Gate City Wellfield and Orange Tree Wellfield) and one new wellfield (Ave Maria Utility Company Wellfield) has been added. The remaining four wellfields were reviewed and no changes occurred since the last modeling in 2004, resulting in no modification being made. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welltield Protection ReportOct Page 3 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper Wellfield 2004 Modeling Immokalee 13 wells Orangetree 2 wells Ave Maria 0 wells FGUA (Golden Gate) 8 wells Everglades City 3 wells Collier County (Golden Gate) 32 wells City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) 26 wells City of Naples (East Golden Gate) 23 wells GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) 2006 Modeling 13 wells - no change 4 wells - 2 new wells 6 new wells 8 wells + greater pumping 3 wells - no change 34 wells + greater pumping 26 wells - no change 23 wells - no change In addition, the status of the areas hatched in "Reliability Wells" and "Wellfield Area" has been reviewed by the Public Utilities Engineering Department and updated to ensure the areas accurately represent existing conditions. Refer to the following updates. 1. The "Reliability Wells" areas located east of CR 951 (Collier Blvd.), south of CR 846 (hnmokalee Road), and north and south of Golden Gate Blvd., were identified as "Areas of Interest." 2. The "Reliability Wells" area located east of CR 951 and north of I -75 was identified as "In Operation." 3. The label "Proposed South Hawthorn Wellfield Extension" located east of CR 951 and south of I -75 has been changed to "South Hawthorn Wellfield Extension (Under Construction, Fall 08' Completion)." The attached Amendments discuss further the details of the proposed and historic amendments, an explanation and intent of the model, the stakeholders who were contacted and wellfield data collected during this process. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel field Protection Reporl0cl Page 4 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper COLLIER COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS, PROPOSED WELLFIELDS AND ASRs e DD% J PROPOSED NORTHEAST REGIONAL / WATER TREATMENT PLANT COASTAL PHASE 1A WELLFlELD AREA RIDGE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL CARICA v ROAD AREAS OF INTEREST ASR CR 846 �C n CITY OF NAPLES SR 84 IN OPERATION COASTAL AVE MARIA RIDGE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL WELLFlELD UTLITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN WELLFlELD G GATE WATER TREATMENT SCALE PLANT WELLFlELD WELLFIELD h m k) � m 0~�5MI. y SOUTH U HAWTHORN EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLRE LLFlELD EXTENSION w V (UNDER CONSTRUCTION, J FALL 08 COMPLETION) CD of AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Or0. Na. 2007 -18 N ® GA,lP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) IMMOKALEE WELLFlELD CR 846 ASR O AVE MARIA ORANGETREE WELLFlELD WELLFlELD EVERGLADES CITY SCALE CR 858 WELLFIELD / k) CITY OF NAPLES 0~�5MI. y EAST GOLDEN GATE AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 4003 V WEGOLDEO Ora. No. 2003 -64 m AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Or0. Na. 2007 -18 N ® RELIABWTY WELLS bs qT (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) 175 MANATEE RA ROAD rn ASR O N EVERGLADES CITY SCALE WELLFIELD 0~�5MI. y AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 4003 V Ora. No. 2003 -64 AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2007 Or0. Na. 2007 -18 ® RELIABWTY WELLS bs qT (BRACKISH OR FRESH WATER) WELLFlELD AREA 7E ASR = AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY PREPARED 81 GRAPHICS AND ME CAL SUPPORT W"ON / C MIIN'tt 004"NENT AND ENNRONMENTAL SE"M RMSION S : LCLLER CW W PC AGN CIXITR0. AND GRNFNTON DEPT. DAM: 9/4007 AM %FPZR12- 2007.D= Map 1. Proposed Future Land Use map in the Growth Management Plan GMPpaper 051100 Oct (1) - Weloeld Protection ReportOct Page 5 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) APPENDIX A. HISTORICAL WELLFIELD PROTECTION MODELING IN COLLIER COUNTY A.1 INITIATION OF MODELING IN 1989 The following wordage shown in italics represents extracted portions from the 1989 and 1991 reports that described the initial motives, directives, setup and running of a wellfield protection zone model in Collier County. It must be kept in mind that some of the concepts, opinions, etc. expressed at that time may not be valid and have been overtaken by events — nevertheless they are provided to record the development of this modeling within the County. Chapter 163.3203, FS, mandates the adoption of Land Development Regulations that "...provide for protection ofpotable water welyields ". The Collier County Growth Management Plan translates this mandate into a series of Goals, Objectives, and Policies for implementation of ground water quality protection in Collier County. The goals state that the County shall: (1) identify and protect natural ground water aquifer recharge areas from activities that could degrade and /or contaminate the quality of ground water; (2) protect natural ground water aquifer recharge areas from activities that unacceptably alter the ground water recharge; (3) protect the County's ground water resources to ensure the highest water quality practical; and (4) conserve, protect, and appropriately manage the County's_fresh water resources. Objectives and Policies included in these goals are: (1) to develop and maintain a 3- dimensional computer ground water flow model for existing and planned wellfields; (2) to amend the Comprehensive Plan to include modeled areas as "environmentally sensitive areas "; (3) to develop an ordinance to provide for an appropriate level of protection for all Collier County ground water; (4) to develop an ordinance(s) that will address well construction, rock mining and excavation, blasting, and confining units; (5) to develop and ordinance that will address both existing and future land use and surface activities relative to petroleum storage tanks, stormwater, regulated substances, industrial and domestic wastes; (6) to develop aground water protection ordinance to protect existing and future welfelds; and (7) to develop technical criteria for determining what areas are critical to the County's long -term ground water needs, e.g., Natural Aquifer Recharge areas. The citizens of Collier County derive their potable water largely from the Surficial Aquifer System via either the permitted public water supply wellfields or the private and household water wells. Water consumption from these sources are divided into three main use areas; potable water, agricultural use, and recreational uses. The Surficial Aquifer System in Collier County is composed of the unconfined water table aquifer and the underlying, semi - confined Lower Tamiami Aquifer, both of which are recharged by direct infiltration of precipitation that accumulates on the surface. The water table of this aquifer system lies at or within a very few feet of the ground surface, being visible in such situations as canals, ponds and lakes, wetland areas, and wet retention stormwater areas. The unsaturated soil or rock above the water table is commonly only a few inches to a few feet thick and provides little attenuation of most contaminants or pollutants passing from the surface downward to the water table. Thus, the Surficial Aquifer System is very susceptible to contamination resulting from land use activities. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welheld Protection ReportOct Page 6 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) The sedimentary rock units underlying Collier County represent several millions of years of mixed carbonate and siliciclastic marine shelf and coastal deposition under subtropical to tropical climatic conditions. These rock units exhibit generally unpredictable vertical and lateral microlithologic as well as permeability and porosity variations with some generally recognized laterally extensive zones of relatively low permeability separating other zones of relatively high permeability. These latter zones or aquifers contain producible water and are separated by zones of lower permeability, i.e., aquitards. Nearly all of the potable water in Collier County is obtained from two permeable zones of the Surficial Aquifer System. This System is unconfined and is recharged directly from the surface. Hence, accurate knowledge ofground water flow directions and recharge characteristics is extremely important when attempting to predict ground water movement. Potential ground water contaminants from land use activities are introduced into aquifer systems via moving water. This movement may be in vertical and/or lateral directions. The conventional wisdom is that with increasing distance traveled in heterogeneous soils /rocks, the more attenuated or "diluted" a pollutant will become. However, even extremely minute amounts ofsome contaminants have high toxicity levels. Natural attenuation processes include filtration, sorption, chemical processes, dilution, and microbiological decomposition. The thin, sandy soils of Collier County are less capable of providing extensive natural attenuation of many pollutants generated by land use activities as compared to thicker, more heterogeneous soils. Hence, contaminant- generating land use activities should be regulated in order to reduce the potential for introduction of pollutants into the ground water system. ° Potential ground water contaminants are as numerous and as varied as the land use activities that produce them. In addition, each contaminant behaves differently (e.g., bacteria, dissolved solids, petroleum products, pesticides, fertilizers, septic or sewage waste) in the water system in terms of its residence time, movement with other pore fluids, reactivity with or to pore fluids and soil /rock, and reactivity to /with other chemicals within the aquifer system. Because of the lack of a complete understanding of contaminant behavior in the aquifer system, combined with only a very general knowledge of soil /rock characteristics affecting this behavior, it is difficult to predict with a high degree of certainty exactly how far or in what direction a particular contaminant will travel in a given time. Numerous studies have been conducted in attempts to estimate travel characteristics, travel times, and residence times of commonly introduced contaminants in aquifer systems. Because of the inhomogeneity of the soil /rock and aquifer systems, most of these estimates provide either ranges of values for velocity, distance, and residence time for the contaminants or present some minimum setback distances based on risk potential to human health and welfare. Hence, rate, distance and longevity of contaminant data for an aquifer system should be recognized as a range of values when considered in the light of risk analysis. In order to develop an effective ground water protection program, an effort must be made to establish a minimum County —wide water quality baseline applicable to all potable water wells and against which to compare suspected contaminated areas. In addition, areas around public water supply wellfields should be provided protection in the form of land use restrictions and prohibitions. The extent ofsuch areas should be predicated on geologic and hydrogeologic data as well as knowledge of the behavior of contaminants in these systems. Wellfield protection zones are in reality risk management zones. Such zones must be based on the best available regional and local geologic and hydrogeologic information; historic and projected GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel field Protection ReportOct Page 7 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) water demands; evaluation of contaminant behavior in the ground water systems; natural attenuation processes,- remediation time and technology; and establishment ofspecific contaminant targets and thresholds. Computer models can evaluate data and generate projections ofground water flow, contaminant travel, and drawdown characteristics within some confidence limits, but it still remains a policy decision of "how much risk is too much risk ". The three - dimensional ground water flow model for wellftelds employed as a predictor in this study was programmed with a 20 year planning horizon. Input such as that mentioned above was then used to define a 20 year risk management zone around each public water supply welfeld. All ground water within this zone has the potential to reach the wellhead within 20 years, and numerous pathways were modeled to illustrate this. Within this zone, three additional zones were established. Zone 1 is defined as that area closest to the wellhead which contains five percent of the total ground water within the 20 year planning zone that will generally reach the wellhead within one year. The rationale for this zone is one ofsanitary hazard versus natural attenuation and risk limits for most contaminants related to sanitary systems. Zone 2 is defined as that area closest to the wellhead, but outside of Zone 1, that contains ten percent of the total ground water within the 20 year planning zone. The model indicates that water in this zone will generally reach the wellhead within 2 years. The establishment ofzones 2 and 3 is predicated on travel times, natural attenuation, and remediation time concerns for contaminants in the regulated or hazardous products and wastes categories. Zone -3 is defined as that area within the 20 year planning horizon in which 25 percent of the ground water will reach the wellhead within approximately five years. Zone 4 is defined as the remainder of the 20 year planning zone and is the immediate Zone of Contribution for these welUields within the planning horizon time frame. Significant contamination ofground water has occurred in every state of this nation, and is being detected with increasing frequency in urban and rural areas; in industrial as well as in agricultural regions, and is adversely effecting development and quality of life in many regions of the world (e.g., Love Canal). In Collier County, the water table is generally within six feet of the surface and the main potable water aquifers are recharged from infiltration through thin soils and semi - consolidated rock units. Natural attenuation of contaminants is not as effective as in other areas where there are thick soil horizons and the where the water table lies deeper beneath the surface. In addition, development in Collier County exposes the water table directly to land use pollutants via quarries, landscaping, stormwater retention /detention systems, accidental /incidental surficial pollution and poorly constructed and maintained wells. The only long term approach to maintaining an acceptable level ofground water quality is to reduce the possibilities for ground water contamination rather than to depend on remediation. This approach must be based on the acquisition and analysis of accurate hydrologic and geologic data, understanding of the nature and reactions of contaminants in the ground water system, knowledge of background water quality levels, and realistic projections offtture demands. From this data can be developed a comprehensive ground water protection program that addresses overall water quality across the County as well as that in the zones of contribution for public water supply wel fields. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (1) - Welllrwhi Protection ReponOct Page 8 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) A.2 MODELING OF 2003 The purpose of the 2003 modeling and reporting by the PCD Consultant, Dr. M.L. Voorhees, was to update the methodologies and results of the initial Collier County regional three - dimensional ground water flow model and the subsequent wellfield submodel transport simulations performed by Voorhees et al, August 1989. The 2003 report describes an updated computer model of the aquifer system in Collier County, Florida, with a concentration on the simulation of wellfield protection areas and efforts in the determination of wellfield protection regions. The following wordage is largely extracted from the Voorhees 2003 report. The purpose of the 2003 Voorhees investigation in Collier County was as thus follows: (1) To update a wellfield protection computer model of the aquifer system in Collier County, (2) To describe the effects of future ground water withdrawals on ground water flow in the vicinity of each study wellfields; (3) To describe the one (1), two (2), five (5), and twenty (20) -year diversion area (i.e., protection zones or travel times) associated with the annual permitted allocation rate for each study wellfleld; and (4) Provide extensive software development and training on this software to enable County staff the ability to update wellfield protection zones frequently. The diversion area is defined as the area, in plan view, through which ground water moves within the aquifer system to a production well in a prescribed number of years. All analyses were performed assuming steady -state conditions. The term "Study Area," as it was used in this 2003 report, refers to a 2,220 square -mile area included in the model and enclosed by the regional model grid. In addition, seven separate study wellfields were investigated as follows: City of Naples (East Golden Gate) — SFWMD Permit No. 1100018W; City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) — SFWMD Permit No. 1100017W; Collier County — SFWMD Permit No. 1100249W; Immokalee Utilities — SFWMD Permit No. 1100013W; Florida Cities Utilities — SFWMD Permit No. 1100148W; Everglades City — SFWMD Permit No. 1100160W; and Orangetree — SFWMD Permit No. 1100419W. The extent of the 2,220 square -mile study area encompasses approximately the western two thirds of Collier County, the southern third of Lee County, and a small part of southern Hendry County in south Florida. The north boundary divides the topographic high about 7 miles north of Lake Trafford. The south boundary is south of the major portion of Lower Tamiami Canal. The east boundary is located far east in Big Cypress Swamp to minimize boundary effects on regional flow. The west boundary is the Gulf of Mexico. An extensive general description of the study area hydrogeology is provided by Knapp et al, 1986, Bennett, 1992, and Voorhees et al, 1989. The reader should review Voorhees et al, 1989, Section 3 and Bennett, 1992 for details associated with hydrogeologic data for the study area. The rock units from which most potable water is withdrawn in Collier County are grouped according to previously defined stratigraphic units and by their hydraulic properties. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wellfield Protection ReporlOct Page 9 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) The sources of geologic and hydrologic data for Collier County, Florida as used in the model to the present are as follows: Information Canal system Geologic structure Hydraulic aquifer characteristics Canal topology Municipal pumping well topology Municipal wellfield pumpages Agricultural pumpage Hydrologic investigations Source Collier County U.S. Geological Survey Bennett, 1992 Knapp et al, 1986 Lee County study (Voorhees et al, 1988) Bennett, 1992 Knapp et al, 1986 Lee County study (Voorhees et al, 1988) Collier County County utilities Bennett,1992 U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps Collier County South Florida Water Management District Bums and Shih, 1984 Knapp et al, 1986 County utilities South Florida Water Management District Collier County Knapp et al, 1986 County utilities Knapp et al, 1986 Collier County Collier County Agricultural Extension South Florida Water Management District Knapp et al, 1986 Bums and Shih, 1984 Jacob, 1983 Gee & Jensen, 1980 Swayze and McPherson, 1977 Bennett et al, 1992 Voorhees et al, August 1989 GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welheld Protection ReportOctPage 10 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) Calibration of the ground water model is critically important to modeling studies such as being described. For the 2003 modeling work the regional model calibration was performed by combining the calibration results from reports from Voorhees et al, 1989 and Bennett, April 1992 ( SFWMD). Voorhees et al, 1989 calibrated a regional model to a course grid and used the regional model to establish boundary conditions for several wellfield submodels. The technique of computerized optimization was used to achieve calibration. Bennett, April 1992 used a coarse grid in manually calibrating a regional model which extended in depth vertically to the Hawthorn aquifer. By combining the calibrated parameters from these two studies and performing detailed grid optimization to place model nodes as close as possible near wells in a single regional model, the original Voorhees et al, 1989 study with wellfield submodels has now been replaced with a single regional model. This provided a unified, streamlined, and easier wellfield protection modeling update procedure for Collier County staff. The deeper Hawthorn aquifer is now included in this model, which is an update as it was not part of the 1989 study, and as in the SFWMD model, the Hawthorn aquifer is configured as a fixed head boundary condition. Due to artesian conditions and extensive confining units above the Hawthorn aquifer, pumpage in the Hawthorn is assumed to not require wellfield protection analysis. The theory associated with the delineation of wellfield protection zones is presented by Voorhees et al, 1989; Section 5 p29, and Section 11 p85. The reader is referred to that discussion for details of the procedure. The only departure in 2003 from that documented procedure is the initial placement of travel time particles at a production well over the entire producing aquifer, vertically. In the prior study by Voorhees et al, 1989 particles were placed at the vertical midpoint of the producing aquifer. The result of this procedural enhancement has been made possible by the availability of more accurate travel time delineation and more powerful computing resources. Running of the model and hence delineation of the wellfield protection zones can be determined very easily by data entry of a few values that include the following: (1) an exactly two character wellfield identifier for the well -- user selected; (2) an exactly three character well identifier -- user selected; (3) the South Florida Water Management ( SFWMD) permitted wellfield average annual allocation in MGD for the well -- obtained from utilities with confirmation from SFWMD; (4) the NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar well coordinates in feet for the well -- based on GPS measurement by County or utility staff; (5) the aquifer from which the well pumps -- obtained from utilities; (6) the well pump capacity in GPM -- obtained from utilities with confirmation from SFWMD; and (7) comment regarding the well -- user selected. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The wellfield protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welhehi Protection ReportOctPage 11 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper where: GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) Qi = Qwa(Qci/EiQci) /1440 (Eq 1) Qi is the wellfield protection pumpage for well in gallons per minute (GPM); Qwa is the SFWMD permitted wellfield average annual allocation in Millions of Gallons per Day (MGD); Qci is the pump capacity of well in the wellfield, gallons per minute (GPM); and EiQci is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. For this study these data were obtained from the various utilities by County staff and are presented in Appendix "E" with cross - references to the numbered items (1) through (7) listed above. For all wellfield protection simulations a conservative transport porosity of 0.15 was used to generate all ground water flow path lines. The methodologies used in the 2003 study are consistent with those previously applied by Voorhees et al, 1989 and the guidelines published for determination of wellhead protection areas (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1987). The use of wellfield protection zones provides a consistent planning tool for the County and the extensive software development performed for the project provides a user - friendly system for County staff to update and change wellfield protection areas. Significant improvement of computational resources since the Voorhees et al, 1989 study provided improved accuracy for the determination of wellfield protection areas based on three dimensional ground water flow and the development of an integrated system which is more accessible by County staff. A.3 MODELING OF 2004 The wellfield protection modeling undertaken in 2004 was carried out by Collier County staff, primarily Mr. Michael Lucas, Environmental Specialist. This modeling followed the methods described above and which had been set up at that time on the County computers by the Pollution Control Department Consultant, Dr. M.L.Voorhees. The data collection phase of the work took place between about May and September 2004 and the computer modeling was completed by November 2004. As described above the specially designed Program suite comprises two linked computer codes: - a hydrogeological model, and - a freeware CAD program called IntelliCAD (a clone of AutoCAD) GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel &ld Protection ReportOclPage 12 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GAIP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) The wellfields covered in the 2004 modeling exercise included: Immokalee Wellfield Orangetree Wellfield FGUA - Golden Gate Wellfield Everglades City Wellfield Collier County Wellfield - Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - East Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - Coastal Ridge Wellfield The results of the modeling provided the LDC required W -1, W -2, W -3, and W -4 protection zones for each wellfield and these zones were included in the County Ordinance No. 05 -27 as Sub Section 3.0. Amendments to Section 3.06.06 Regulated Wellfields. APPENDIX B. MODELING OF 2006 LEADING TO 2007 LDC AMENDMENT REQUEST B.ISTAKEHOLDERS The necessary raw data for the 2006 modeling exercise was gathered from the public water supply wellfield Owners and Stakeholders in October and November 2006. The wellfields modeled in 2006 included: Immokalee Wellfield Everglades City Wellfield Orangetree Wellfield Collier County Wellfield Ave Maria Wellfield City of Naples - East Golden Gate Wellfield FGUA - Golden Gate Wellfield City of Naples - Coastal Ridge Wellfield The full listing of organizations and personnel that were the primary contacts for the 2006 modeling is provided as Appendix D. B.2 METHODS The purpose of the 2006 modeling was, as before, to establish areas of increasingly vulnerability surrounding each public wellfield from which their primarily water was sourced and hence which needed special protection from pollution. The methods used were exactly as described and used previously, namely collection of the relatively limited amount of input data, keying in of this data to the software, running of the modeling software, generation of the 1, 2, 5, and 20 year particle flow path lines, drawing of the shapes /polygons that surround each of these flow path shapes, and finally copying and superimposition of these zone shapes onto a base map of the county. These wellfield protection zone maps then form the basis of the LDC content. GMPpaper 031100 Oct (1) - Wellfield Protection ReponOciPage 13 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) B.3 RESULTS For wellfields where there was no change in the input data from that used in 2004, the 2006 modeling resulted in exactly the same time path flowlines and hence the same 1, 2, 5, and 20 year Protection Zones as the 2004 model; this occurred for the Everglades City Wellfield. For the extensive City of Naples Coastal Ridge and East Golden Gate Wellfields, and the Immokalee Wellfield, although minor model input changes were applied to the model, because of minor well or pumping changes, the resulting wellfield Protection Zones are unchanged from the 2004 modeling. For wellfields with new or significantly altered input data, new timeline flow path shapes files were generated resulting in new 1, 2, 5, and 20 year Protection Zones - this was the case for the Orangetree Wellfield, FGUA (Golden Gate) Wellfield and Collier County Golden Gate Wellfield. The entirely new Ave Maria Wellfield input data was compiled and applied to the model which then generated new 1, 2, 5, and 20 year timelines, i.e. W -1, W -2, W -3, and W -4, Protection Zones. A summary of the changes between the 2004 and 2006 modeling, and which gives rise to the request for Amendments to the "Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map" located within the Collier County Growth Management Plan's Future Land Use Element, are listed below. Wellfield 2004 Modeling 2006 Modeling Immokalee 13 wells 13 wells - no change Orangetree 2 wells 4 wells - 2 new wells Ave Maria 0 wells 6 new wells FGUA (Golden Gate) 8 wells 8 wells + greater pumping Everglades City 3 wells 3 wells - no change Collier County (Golden Gate) 32 wells 34 wells + greater pumping City of Naples (Coastal Ridge) 26 wells 26 wells - no change City of Naples (East Golden Gate) 23 wells 23 wells - no change Detailed data for each wellfield is attached in Appendix E. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel field Protection ReportOclPage 14 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) APPENDIX C. REFERENCES Bennet, M.W., April 1992, A Three - Dimensional Finite Difference Ground Water Flow Model of Western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 92 -04, DRE 312, 358p. Bums, W.S., and Shih, George, 1984, Preliminary evaluation of ground water monitoring network in Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Memorandum, 46 p. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., 1987, Final Report, Wellfield Protection Zone Modeling, Lee County Florida, Prepared for Department of Community Development Division of Environmental Services, Fort Myers, Florida: Page 4 -8. Pollution Control Department, 1991, Collier County Environmental Services Division, Ground Water Protection Ordinance Technical Report, PC- OFR- 91 -05, 247p. de Marsily, Ghislain, 1986, Quantitative Hydrogeology: Academic Press, London, 440 p. Gee and Jenson, 1980, Big Cypress Basin water resources study No. 2201: contract report 77- 186, Gee and Jenson Engineers, Architects, and Planners, Inc., West Palm Beach, 118p. Gethar, L.W., 1986, Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications: Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, No. 9, p. 135S -1455. Hunter /HydroSoft, Inc., April 1989, Appendix Report - Collier County Three - Dimensional Ground water Modeling Study: Hunter /HydroSoft. HydroSoft, Inc., 1988, Three - dimensional model of ground water flow in Collier County, Florida: Data assimilation, model conceptualization, and parameters: Contract Letter Report 1, Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, Florida, 47p. Jacob, P.G., 1983, Hydrogeology of the shallow aquifer south of Naples, Collier County: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 83 -3, 52p. Joumel, A.G., and Huijbregts, Ch.J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600p. Knapp, M.S., Bums, W.S., and Sharp, T.S., 1986, Preliminary assessment of the ground -water resources of western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 86 -1, Parts 1 and 2, 142p. Prickett, T. A., 1967, Designing Pumped Well Characteristics into Electric Analog Models: Ground Water v. 5(4), National Water Well Association. Prickett, T.A., T.G. Naymik, and C. G. Lomiquist, 1981, A Random -Walk Solute Transport Model for Selected Groundwater Quality Evaluations: Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 65p. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel field Protection ReportOctPage 15 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) Swayze, L.J., and McPherson, B.F., The effect of the Faka Union Canal system on water levels in the Fakahatchee Strand, Collier County, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations 77 -61, 19p. Hunter/HydroSoft, Inc., 1988, Interim InterTrans Users Guide: Hunter /HydroSoft, Inc. Voorhees, M.L., 1981, Advanced methods for the selection of urban runoff design storms: Doctoral thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign, 207p. Voorhees, M.L., and Kirkner, R.A., 1987, Users guide for applied ground water flow with InterSat: HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, Florida, 132p. Voorhees, M.L., and Mades, D.M., August 1989, Three- Dimensional Simulation of Wellfleld Protection Areas in Collier County, Florida, 120p. Voorhees, M.L., Mades, D.M., and Ruskauff, Greg, 1988, Report on Lee County kriging analysis, water -level network optimization, and water budget: contract report, HydroSoft, Inc., Sarasota, 38p. Voorhees, M.L. March 2003, Update of Three - Dimensional Simulation of Wellfield Protection Areas in Collier County, Florida, 80p. Walton, W.C., 1985, Groundwater supply and contamination: National Water Well Association Walton, W.C., 1970, Groundwater resource evaluation: McGraw -Hill. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel #leld Protection ReponOctPage 16 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper 'o f a O �0 R N O A l ro d d m o o ct n. o ry m N ryy �Y � Yii Li mno � t m ro y_ G G A lD r� ii 5. Oi 'w" ° n W A ... ^❑i Q7 C. O N � N N W W �Ob ANN O W W J�°b N W �° N N W W bb N W b N W b N N N W W O\ N N N W W W bib O bbb N N b W W O p b U U to J w b Oo to - U J w b W W 00 lA Ga W a w w Rw ro d d ( { � § / \ \ \ (# � »44 °S® �2 #° / / . m f tz ( 2E o {« 2 » f f § - < gE ■ ! : ! §§ � § / \ \ \ GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) APPENDIX E: DETAILED WELLFIELD MODELING DATA IMMOKALEE WELLFIELD Description Welfield Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. ID The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (ft) (ft) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 tEo. 1 well 201 INE Immokalee IQ 201 4.710 522288 760414 Lower 350 288 Tamiami well 202 INE Immokalee IU 202 4.710 522653 760419 Lower 350 288 Tamiami well 203 INE Immokalee IU 203 4.710 521933 759759 Lower 350 288 Tamiami well 102 INW Immokalee IU 102 4.710 508669 763988 Lower 250 206 Tamiami well 103 INW Immokalee IO 103 4.710 509043 764732 Lower 200 165 Tamiami well 104 INW Immokalee IQ 104 4.710 509462 764641 Lower 350 288 Tamiami well 7 SE Immokalee IU I07 4.710 516219 754970 Lower 400 329 Tamiami well 8 SE Immckalee IU I08 4.710 516483 755326 ISandstone 200 165 well 9 SE Immokalee IU 109 4.710 515837 754728 Sandstone 225 185 well 108 SE Immokalee IO 110 4.710 516766 755265 Sandstone 350 288 well 11 SE Immokalee IO ill 4.710 516703 755040 Sandstone 250 206 well 12 SE Immokalee IU I12 4.710 515837 755399 Lower 350 288 Tamiami well 13 SE Immokalee IU I13 4.710 515253 755094 Lower 350 268 Tamiami Comment I An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: (Eq• 1) Q; = Qwa(Qd/EiQo) /1440 where; Q; - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Q,„e - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Qn - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and LQd - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - We1ffleld Protection Repon0ctPage 19 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) ORANGETREE WELLFIELD Description Welltleld Well 1D AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. ID The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (D) (it) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 (Eq. 1 Orangetree well OTl OT OT1 0.260 466038 713260 Lower 300 90 Tamiami Orangetree well OT2 OT OT2 0.260 464959 713814 Lower 300 90 Tamiami Orangetree well OT3 OT OT3 0.260 465006 712047 Lower 300 90 Tamiami Orangetree well OT4 OT OT4 0.260 464627 711612 Lower 300 90 Tamiami Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 'Be well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq- 1) Q, = Q.,(Q6/y_iQd) /1440 Q - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Q„ - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Q6 - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and E;Q,; - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpoper 051100 Oct (2) - Welffleld Protection ReportOctPage 20 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) AVE MARIA WELLFIELD Description Welllield Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled ID Allocation Easterly (ft) Northerly Aquifer Capacity Diochuge (MGD) (ft) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 .1 Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 1 AV A01 1.000 511739 723678 Lower 700 116 Tamiami Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 2 AV A01 1.000 511839 722914 Lower 700 116 Tamiami Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 3 AV A03 1.000 512239 722023 Lower 700 116 Tamiami Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 4 AV A04 1.000 512894 721212 Lower 700 116 1 Tamiami Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 5 AV A05 1.000 513999 720346 Lower 700 116 Tamiami Ave Maria Utility (AV) well 6 AV A06 1.000 513896 719472 Lower 700 116 Tamiami Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitted well field avemee annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. 1) Qj= Qw Q,IE&) /1440 Q; - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Qwa - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Qd - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and F;Qa - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welfeld Protection ReportOctPage 21 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE CITY WELLFIELD Description WelNleld Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled ID Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (ft) (ft) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 .1 Florida Governmental Utility FC 001 1.923 428360 672103 water 200 132 Authority (FGUA)well 1 Table Florida Governmental Utility FC 02A 1.923 428341 672024 Water 250 164 Authority (FGUA) well 02A Table Florida Governmental Utility FC 003 1.923 428673 672057 water 180 118 Authority (FGUA) well 3 Table Florida Governmental Utility FC 004 1.923 428641 672050 Water 200 132 Authority (FGUA) well 4 Table Florida Governmental Utility FC 005 1.923 428603 672144 Water 250 164 Authority (FGUA) well 5 Table Florida Governmental Utility FC 008 1.923 428648 671962 Water 250 164 Authority (FGUA) well 8 Table Florida Governmental Utility FC F10 1.923 428423 671993 Water 350 230 Authority (FGUA) well 10 Table Florida Governmental utility FC Fll 1.923 428540 671974 Water 350 230 Authority (FGUA) well 11 Table Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. 1) Q = Qwa(Q. /Y Qd) /1440 Q; - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); QH,a - is the SFW MD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Q� - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and LQ, - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel yield Protection ReportOctPage 22 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD Description WellDeld Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled ID Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (D) (ft) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 .1 Everglades City well ECl EC EC1 0.460 536019 590264 Water 220 106 Table Everglades City well EC2 EC EC2 0.460 536398 590230 Water 220 106 Table Everglades City well EC3 EC EC3 0.460 536823 590233 Water 220 106 1 1 Table Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. f) Qi= Qwa(Qa /YiQci) /1440 Qi - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Qw, - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Qs - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and E;Qc; - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel field Protection ReponOctPage 23 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES GOLDEN GATE WELI.FIELD Description WelMeid WeDID AVERAGE NAD83 11AD83 Producing Wen Modeled ID Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capuity Discharge (MGD) (D) (D) (GPM) (GPM) Cam nt 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 li (Eq. 1 Collier County CGG well 1 CC 001 20.825 452696 684329 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 2 CC 002 20.825 453992 683964 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 3 CC 003 20.825 455312 684026 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 4 CC 004 20.825 456661 683655 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 5 CC 005 20.825 458020 683818 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 6 CC 006 20.825 457272 685070 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 7 CC 007 20.825 457256 686049 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 9 CC 009 20.825 457239 688013 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 10 CC 010 20.825 457230 689001 Lower 70D 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 11 CC 011 20.825 457226 690352 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 12 CC 012 20.825 457210 691367 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG we 11 13 CC 013 20.825 457202 692450 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 14 CC 014 20.825 457204 693358 Lower 700 340 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 15 CC 015 20.825 957185 699327 Lower 700 390 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 16 CC 016 20.825 457178 695328 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 17 CC 017 20.825 469945 683749 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 18 CC 018 20.825 461252 663766 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 19 CC 019 20.825 462584 683766 Lower 1000 485 amiami Collier County CGG well 20 CC 020 20.825 462742 684758 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 21 cc 021 20.825 457821 682202 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 22 CC 022 20.825 457821 681282 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 23 CC 023 20.825 457824 680193 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 24 CC 024 20.825 457825 679542 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 25 CC 025 20.825 457834 678232 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 26 CC 026 20.825 459136 678097 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 27 CC 027 20.825 460464 678044 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 28 CC C28 20.825 452665 685170 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 29 CC C29 20.825 453981 684772 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 30 CC C30 20.825 462649 685209 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 31 CC C31 20.825 456861 696390 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 32 CC C32 20.825 457158 697703 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 33 CC C33 20.825 451507 684037 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 35 CC D35 20.825 434546 695012 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami Collier County CGG well 36 CC D36 20.825 433377 695041 Lower 1000 485 Tamiami GMPpaper 051100 Oct (1) - We1#1eld Protection ReportOctPage 24 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. a The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. 1) Q = Q, (Qi /ZiQJnaao Q - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Q, - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Qi - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and EiQ�; - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (1) - Wel &/d Protecdon ReportOctPage 25 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) CITY OF NAPLES COASTAL RIDGE WELLFIELD GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welheld Protection ReportOctPage 26 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper Description Welltield Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing Well Modeled ID Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (ft) (it) (GPM) (GPM) Comment 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 .1 City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 1 CR 001 18.422 396597 669462 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 2 CR 002 18.422 397189 670330 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 3 CR 003 18.422 398109 670327 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 4 CR 004 18.422 396577 670500 Lower 350 476 1 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 5 CR 005 18.422 396572 671579 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 7 CR 007 18.422 396608 674016 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well 8 CR 008 18.422 396591 674837 Lower 350 476 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 010 18.422 396638 677293 Lower 350 476 10 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR Oil 18.422 397158 678280 Lower 350 476 11 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 012 18.422 397149 679281 Lower 350 476 12 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 013 18.422 397123 680335 Lower 350 476 13 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 014 18.422 396941 681507 Lower 350 476 14 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 015 18.422 396953 682625 Lower 350 476 15 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 016 18.422 396617 683001 Lower 350 476 16 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 017 18.422 396597 683912 Lower 350 476 17 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 018 18.422 396718 664917 Lower 350 476 18 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 019 18.422 396836 685908 Lower 350 476 19 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 020 18.422 396970 686865 Lower 350 476 20 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 021 18.422 397104 687872 Lower 350 476 21 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 022 18.422 397218 688878 Lower 350 476 22 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 023 18.422 397353 689884 Lower 350 476 23 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 024 18.422 397488 690885 Lower 350 476 24 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 027 18.422 397876 693875 Lower 350 476 27 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 028 18.422 398004 694918 Lower 350 476 28 Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 06A 18.422 396554 673100 Lower 500 680 6A Tamiami City of Naples Coastal Ridge well CR 09A 18.422 396491 676799 Lower 500 680 9A Tamiami GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welheld Protection ReportOctPage 26 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws. 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. I) Qj = QW.(Q.f /Y Qa) /1440 is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Q, - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and Y_iQ,; - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Welfeld Protection ReportOctPage 27 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 1005 -16) CITY OF NAPLES EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel#iield Protection ReporlOctPage 28 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper Description Well}ield Well ID AVERAGE NAD83 NAD83 Producing WCE Modeled ID Allocation Easterly Northerly Aquifer Capacity Discharge (MGD) (ft) (ft) (GPM) (GPM) COMPM 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 .1 City of Naples Golden Gate well G1 EG GO7 18.839 482701 695225 Lowe. 500 392 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G2 EG G02 18.839 482704 693920 Lower 500 392 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G3 EG G03 18.839 482691 692590 Lower 500 392 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G4 EG G04 18.839 482758 691174 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G5 EG G05 18.839 482736 689963 Lower 900 705 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G6 EG G06 18.839 482746 688590 Lower 500 392 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G7 EG G07 18.839 482749 687262 Lower 900 705 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G8 EG G08 18.839 482756 685936 Lower 900 705 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G9 EG G09 18.839 482764 684619 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G10 EG G10 18.839 482775 683302 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G11 EG G11 18.839 482781 681984 Lower 600 470 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G12 EG G12 18.839 482794 680670 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G13 EG G13 18.839 482801 679348 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G14 EG G14 18.839 482806 678021 LnweL 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G16 EG G16 18.839 482671 697908 Lower 1000 783 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G17 EG G17 18.839 482654 699276 Lower 1000 783 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G18 EG G18 18.839 482643 700542 Lower 1000 783 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G19 EG G19 18.839 482657 701810 Lower 1000 783 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G20 EG G20 18.839 482639 703184 Lower 1000 783 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G21 EG G21 18.839 482493 704438 Lower 700 548 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G22 EG G22 18.839 477560 689936 Lower 350 274 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G23 EG G23 18.839 477755 691318 Lower 750 588 Tamiami City of Naples Golden Gate well G24 EG G24 18.839 477542 692581 Lower 400 313 Tamiami GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel#iield Protection ReporlOctPage 28 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper GMP- FLUE Amendment Request (CPSP- 2005 -16) Comment 1 An exactly two character well field identifier. 2 An exactly three character well identifier. 3 The South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permitted well field average annual allocation in MGD for the well. 4 The NAD83 Easterly and Northerly State Planar coordinates in feet for the well. 5 The producing aquifer from which the well draws- 6 The well pump capacity in GPM. 7 Comment regarding the well. The item numbers coincide with the well data entry sequence for the software developed for this study. The well field protection pumpage for each well is then computed by the software developed for this project using the formula: where; (Eq. 1) Qi° Qa (Qw /EiQd)/1440 Qi - is the well field protection pumpage for well (i) in gallons per minute (GPM); Qw, - is the SFWMD permitted well field average annual allocation in Gallons per Day; Q, - is the pump capacity of well (i) in the well field, gallons per minute (GPM); and EiQ,i - is the summation of all well capacities in the wellfield. GMPpaper 051100 Oct (2) - Wel #leld Protection ReportOctPage 29 of 29 Growth Management Plan Paper Agenda Item 4G CDAM-r CoT.tvrty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 5, 2007 RE: PETITION NO. CP- 2006 -04, TRANSITIONAL CONDITIONAL USE EXCEPTION IN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNERS: Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Applicant: Neil Bennett First Congregational Church of Naples, Inc. 5100 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL, 34103 Owner: First Congregational Church of Naples, Inc. 5100 Tamiami Trail, Suite 138 Naples, FL, 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property contains 2.6 acres more or less and is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, lying about 300 feet east of Oaks Boulevard, north of Autumn Oaks Lane, and west of Valewood Drive (extended). This property is generally situated at the northwest boundary of Golden Gate Estates, within the Urban Estates Planning Community in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida. (See Attachment "A ") f- Agenda Item 4G REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to add language effectively accommodating a future Conditional Use petition to allow a transitional land use as it would otherwise be prohibited under the Estates — Mixed Use District, Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Though the petitioner is a church, it should be understood that, if this petition is approved, the subject property will be eligible for any Conditional Uses listed in the E, Estates zoning district. Overcoming this prohibition involves: 1) A site - specific exception to restrictions on Transitional Conditional Uses where directly adjacent to a non - residential use; and, 2) A site - specific exception to restrictions on same where adjacent to permitted essential services. And is proposed, as follows (text with single underline is added): Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Text Amendment: [pages 42, 431 d) Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non - residential and residential areas_ The purpose of this _ provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non - residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non - residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non - residential use (zoned or developed); • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the non - residential use, except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22, GGE Unit 97; • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; and • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code, except for libraries and museums; except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22, GGE Unit 97, and • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing residential uses. 2- Agenda Item 4G SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: The subject property is currently zoned E, Estates, comprises 2.6 acres and contains a single - family residence. The current Future Land Use Designation is Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Residential and commercial land uses across Immokalee Road, in the Huntington and Quail II PUDs - Urban Residential Subdistrict designation on FLUM South: E, Estates - Autumn Oaks Lane; then developed & undeveloped residential lots - Residential Estates Subdistrict designation on FLUM East: E, Estates Developed & undeveloped residential lots - Residential Estates Subdistrict designation on FLUM West: E, Estates - Permitted essential services (telephone switching station) and model home - Residential Estates Subdistrict designation on FLUM STAFF ANALYSIS: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DATA AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, "Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments, Evaluation and Appraisal Reports, Land Development Regulations and Determinations of Compliance" sets forth the minimum data and analysis requirement for comprehensive plan amendments. More specifically, Section 9J -5.005 "General Requirements" delineates criteria for plan amendments in sub - section 9J -5.005 (2) "Data and Analysis Requirements." Sub - section 9J- 5.005(2) states in part that "All goals, objectives, standards, findings and conclusions within the comprehensive plan and its support documents, and within plan amendments and its support documents, shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and analysis applicable to each element. To be based upon data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue... the Department will IcIM Agenda Item 4G review each comprehensive plan [amendment] for the purpose of determining whether the plan [amendment] is based on data and analyses described in this Chapter and whether data were collected and applied in a professionally acceptable manner." It is incumbent upon all applicants requesting comprehensive plan amendments to provide supporting data and analyses in conjunction with any relevant support documents. It is not the responsibility of Collier County staff to generate data and analysis for the applicant, although it is staff's responsibility to identify any shortcomings in the data and analyses during the consistency review process and to request additional information that is deemed essential in the review of the submitted request for a plan amendment. Any outstanding deficiencies with respect to data and analyses that may remain at the time of any requisite public hearing are the responsibility of the applicant. A detailed synopsis of the adequacy of the data and analysis for the subject plan amendment is set forth with specificity below. Environmental Impacts The environmental report submitted by Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. with this application is dated December 2006. Environmental Specialists in the Environmental Services Department reviewed application materials and 'find that it is consistent with the applicable GMP and LDC requirements. [The Environmental Services] department is not approving the location of the Preserve that is depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan ". Reviewers comment further, reminding the petitioner that "this [specific Preserve location] will be [formally] reviewed at either the Conditional Use or Site Development Plan stage ". The Conceptual Site Plan was withdrawn after the review was completed, and is not necessary until another consideration at a later date. Public Facilities Impact, Including Traffic Impacts: This petition seeks to build a 6,000 square foot church with a seating capacity of 300. Construction is to commence in 2008, with completion expected during 2009. Information provided by the petitioner explained the impacts of developing the subject property with such a facility, as follows: With respect to Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer— no impacts, as the church facilities will continue to use the existing private water well and septic system. With respect to Stormwater Drainage — project is designed to comply with 25 -year, 3 -day storm routing requirements. No adverse impacts are anticipated for Solid Waste, and Community and Regional Park facilities. The church will generate fewer than 1,000 annual average daily trips, and fewer than 100 trip ends during weekday periods. These are not significant impacts on roadways. IzM Agenda Item 4G Paul Kwa, PE, PMP, Public Utilities Engineering Department Project Manager, reviewed CP- 2006-04 materials and replied with no further comments. Appropriateness of Change: Generally, Conditional Uses (CUs) are permitted throughout the County on most residentially zoned land. As early as 1991, the residents of Golden Gate Estate expressed their concerns regarding the scattered approvals of non - residential conditional uses, with little or no discretionary criteria. The people in the Estates wanted County Planning policies and zoning provisions to provide a more appropriate amount of specificity and certainty as to where . conditional uses could be expected and would be considered. They crafted GMP language which provided the certainty expected, with the adopted result being the Conditional Use provisions written into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan when it was adopted in 1991. These were subsequently revised in 2003 -2004 based upon recommendations of the GGAMP Restudy Committee, a BCC- appointed citizen committee. That Committee evaluated the areas encompassed by the GGAMP and recommended greater restrictions on conditional uses in some areas, and additional allowances for other areas, as reflected in the current GGAMP. The subject property was not identified as an area appropriate for Conditional Uses nor as an area in which there was a particular need for Conditional Uses. The "Conditional Uses Subdistrict' in the Estates — Mixed Use District within the GGAMP contains specific provisions for Essential Services CUs, CUs on Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard, Transitional CUs adjacent to Neighborhood Centers, Transitional CUs [as buffers between residential and certain non - residential uses], and, Special Exceptions to CU Locational Criteria [for certain excavation activities and temporary model homes]. For our present purposes, we will focus on the provisions for "Transitional Conditional Uses" — reduced to component statements — which state: "Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas." Conditional Uses may not be granted to subject properties not in transitional areas; the subject property is not in such a transitional area. "A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non - residential and residential areas." The subject property is not located between existing non - residential and residential areas. "The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non - residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use." The secondary purpose of this provision is not to allow conditional uses in areas that are not adjacent to existing non - residential uses and are therefore generally appropriate for residential use, as is the case for the subject property. -5- Agenda Item 4G "The conditional use will act as a buffer between non - residential and residential areas." The subject property cannot act as a buffer, as it is not located between existing non- residential and residential areas. Staff has an overall discomfort with the structure of the proposed text amendments. That is, The Transitional Conditional Uses provision is presently constructed as a list of criteria identifying what will and will not be considered a transitional conditional use. The criteria describe the types and variety of land uses allowed to locate next to different types and variety of land uses. The petition does not propose language which would increase, decrease, or redefine the types of land uses to be considered, or increase, decrease or redefine their variety. The petition does however, propose a single -site exception to these criteria. Moreover, the petition proposes its exceptions to these criteria because it cannot or would not otherwise meet them. A transitional conditional use is not permitted here. To approve it as a Conditional Use would be considered spot zoning. To approve the single -site exception could be considered spot planning. Staff would be far more comfortable with a proposal which is constructed in a manner similar to its parent provision — one which expands or contracts the types and variety of transitional conditional uses by criteria. In staff's opinion, approval of this amendment may result with other transitional land uses petitioning to develop on properties where otherwise prohibited, without demonstrating compatibility, appropriateness of location, or need. Approving this exception will impose unintended incompatibilities on surrounding properties. They may eventually need additional exceptions from the same provision(s) in order to regain compatibility. Neiahborhood Information Meetina Svnoosis The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was conducted January 4, 2007, after the agent/applicant duly noticed and advertised the meeting. Approximately 20 people attended the NIM, held at the North Naples Baptist Church, 1811 Oakes Boulevard, and heard the following information: Petitioner's agent explained how their application for the Conditional Use will eventually follow approval of this Plan amendment. The subject property is a through lot - with frontage on roadways on both the north and south sides. Property owners have agreed to reserve at least a 45 foot wide right -of -way easement along the east edge of the subject property in order to connect Immokalee Road to Autumn Oaks Lane. This new street would be an extension of Valewood Drive from the north, across Immokalee Road, though not necessarily named as such. Agenda Item 4G Audience members asked about access. It was explained that one access would lead onto Autumn Oaks Lane and one onto the (yet unnamed) side street. Petitioners have made a presentation to the local neighborhood group previously, and had agreed this new side street would not be a major transportation "corridor", but would be designed as a "residential street'. Final details about these design elements have not been worked out with the County, but the design may be limited access in some manner. Southbound turning movements may be restricted at Immokalee Road. The new side street may be limited to northbound traffic. [Synopsis prepared by L Koehler, Public Information Coordinator, and C. Schmidt, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The petitioner has not submitted data and analysis to support this amendment, as required by Rule 9J -5, F.A.C. — no inventory of eligible Conditional Use sites in Golden Gate Estates, nor any analysis of availability in the nearby Urban designated area. Because the Urban designation does not contain locational criteria for Conditional Uses, they are allowed anywhere in the Urban area. Further, Golden Gate Estates in this area only has frontage on Immokalee Road for one mile, and only along the south side. The question goes unanswered as to why it is necessary to seek this amendment at this location. No information demonstrates that suitable sites do not exist in the Urban designated area in this general vicinity. • The proposed uses will allow development generally compatible with uses on surrounding properties. • The subject property abuts one collector road - Immokalee Road. • As a result of this amendment there are no significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the CIE, with respect to Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater Drainage, Solid Waste, Community and Regional Parks facilities. • The Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict no longer provides a clear transition between the Urban Residential Subdistrict on the west side of CR -951 and the Agricultural /Rural lands to the east as envisioned when the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict was established in 1989. • Approval of this petition may lead to other requests for non - transitional, non - residential uses, on nearby and similarly situated properties. • The applicant has not submitted data and analysis to demonstrate a need for this (or other) Conditional Use site (e.g. inventory of available Conditional Use sites in Golden Gate Estates), nor the appropriateness of this site (e.g. compatibility analysis, impact upon other properties to possibly seek similar exception to locational criteria). LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: 7- Agenda Item 4G This Staff Report has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP- 2006 -04 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Florida Department of Community of Affairs. If the Planning Commission determines that a recommendation of approval is warranted, staff recommends further modifications to the proposed language, noted below in double strike - through /double underline format, as follows: d) Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non - residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non - residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non - residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non - residential use (zoned or developed). except for Tract 22, GGE Unit 97; • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the non - residential use, except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22, GGE Unit 97; • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; aad • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code, except for libraries and museums; except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22, GGE Unit 97, and • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing residential uses. Prepared By: Reviewed By: L. Sjhmidt, Principal Planner ehen�sive Planning Department Agenda Item 4G Date: 7 Date: 2 D-0" 07 David C. Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager Comprehensive Planning Department 7 Reviewed By: Date: .! -2 C) , (3-7 Randall J. Cohen, AICP, Director Comprehensive Planning Department Reviewed By: 2)Ia c.,r I, • 11. � ' Date: 2 - 2-4 Marjori . Student-Stirling Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney Approved B Y — Date: '41e),7 (;tph� K. Schm tt, Administrator unity Development and Environmental Services Division PETITION NO.: CP- 2006 -04 Staff Report for the March 5, 2007 CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the June 4, 2007 BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, Chairman Io `i I�. is ♦ �t � Ms. Melissa Zone, Principle Planner Department of Zoning and Land Development 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34102 Dear Ms. Zone: Please consider this letter as an endorsement for support for the application of First Congregational Church of Naples Conditional Use for their proposed building of a church on the 2.6 acres of land (Folio # 41931040004) on Autumn Oaks Lane. I understand the church has filed a Golden Gate Area Master Plan Amendment and that application is under review and should come before the county commissioners in the near future. I do want to say we have appreciated having representatives of First Congregational Church as a part of our association. They have attended our meetings and already represented themselves as a part of our community. They have further indicated their willingness to work with the county and with our association in the future access to -- Immokalee Road/ Valewood Drive which would take some 45 feet of their land for the proposed road. Members of the church have shared with us a rendering of what their new church will look like and we feel such a beautiful church would be a very positive addition to our community. We appreciate having people like these as a part of our community and request that the Department of Zoning and Land Development will look favorably upon their application. If you have any questions, please contact me at 239 -597 -3737 or karlfry(a,embarq_mail.com . Sincerely, 7 3, da /-2/07 Karl Fry President Oakes Estates Advisory, Inc. APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CP- 2006 -4 SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH RANGE 27 EAST PREPARED FOR: First Congregational Church of Naples, Inc. 5100 Tamiami Trail North Naples, Florida 34103 -2824 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN PETITION NUMBER CP- 2006 -4 DATE RECEIVED PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE PLANNER ASSIGNED: COMMISSION DISTRICT: [ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF] This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Phone: (239) 403 -2300; Fax: (239) 643 6869. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97 -431 (attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-403-2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant(s) Neil E. Bennett Company First Congre¢ational Church of Naples Inc Mailing Address 5100 Tamiami Trail North City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 -2824 Phone Number Fax Number B. Name of Agent* Wayne Arnold -THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company/Firm 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Mailing Address 3800 Via Del Rev City Bonita Spring_ State FL Zip Code 34134 Phone Number 239 - 947 -1144 Fax Number 239 - 947 -0375 02/2002 Email Address warnold(a)eradyminor com C. Name of Owner(s) of Record First Congregational Church of Naples Inc Mailing Address 5100 Tamiami Trail North City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 -2824 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. II. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each, and provide one copy of the Articles of Incorporation, or other documentation, to verify the signer of this petition has the authority to do so. Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock First Congregational Church of 100% Naples, Inc. 5100 Tamiami Trail N. Naples, FL 34103 -2824 C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 2 02/2002 E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contact purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners, and provide one copy of the executed contract. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (11/2005) leased ( ): Terms of lease yrs /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. NOTE: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 02/2002 III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Legal Description Golden Gate Est, Unit 97, Tr 22, Less the north 50 feet B. Section: 29 Township: 48 Range:26 C. Tax I.D. Number (Folio #) 41931040004 D. General Location 6225 Autumn Oakes Lane, Naples, FL 34119 E. Planning Community Urban Estates F.TAZ 188 G. Size in Acres 2.6t H. Zoning E, Estates 1. Present Future Land Use Map Designation (s) Estates Designation IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. Growth Management Plan Element(s) OR Sub - Element(s) to be amended: Future Land Use Immokalee Area Master Plan Transportation Coastal & Conservation Intergovernmental Coord. Sanitary Sewer Drainage ✓ Golden Gate Area Master Plan ___Capital Improvement Housing Recreation & Open Space Potable Water Solid Waste Natural Groundwater Aquifer B. Amend Page(s) 43 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element As Follows: (Use Gros thfoughs to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: C. Amend Future Land Use Map(s) designation, TO: District, Subdistrict District, Subdistrict [If new District and/or Sub - district proposed, include Future Land Use Map with legend depicting it]. D. Amend other Map(s) and Exhibits as follows: (Name & Page #) E. Describe additional changes requested: 02/2002 V. REQUIRED INFORMATION Note: All Aerials must be at a scale of no smaller than 1" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8' /z x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE 1. X Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI'S, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. 2. X Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. 3. X Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 500 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 1. X Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. X Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION - MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT- FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. 2. X Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) No EIR required per staff meeting 3/15/06 3. X Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. Provide copy of County's Historical /Archaeological Probability Map and correspondence from Florida Department of State. No EIR required per staff meeting 3/15/06 D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: I. NO Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)Ta,F.A.C.) If so, identify area located in ACSC. 2. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.? 3. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small 02/2002 Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S.? (Reference 9J- I1.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) 4. NO Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). if yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 5. YES Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district /subdistrict identified (commercial, industrial, etc.), or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district/subdistrict? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5)F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and compatibility of use with surrounding land uses, and as it concerns protection of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J- 1.007, F.A.C.). E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. X Provide the existing adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS, and document the impact the proposed change will have on that Standard, for each of the following public facilities: a) X Potable Water - The property currently has a residence, which uses a well. The church intends to use the existing well. b) X Sanitary Sewer - The residence on the property uses a septic system. The church intends to use or upgrade the existing septic system. C) X Arterial & Collector Roads: Name of specific road and LOS Immokalee Road Oaks Blvd d) X Drainage e) X Solid Waste f) X Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital hnprovement Element Policy 1.1.2 and 1.1.5). 2. X Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools, and emergency medical services. 02/2002 3. X Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. (Please refer to Exhibit V.E.3 attached.) F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. Exhibit V.F.I Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM) (Community Number 120067, Panel Number 215G, November 17, 2005). 2. Exhibit V.F.1 Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). No location of wellfields and cones of influence are shown on Collier County Zoning Map number GGE23. 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable. 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable. 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO121MATION 1. X $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 2. N/A $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners, due at time of submittal. 3. OK Plus Legal Advertisement Costs (Your portion determined by number of petitions and divided accordingly. 4. X Proof of ownership (Copy of deed). 5. X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (see attached form). 6. X 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments, including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 15 copies of the complete application will be required. Additional copies may be required. * Maps, aerials, sketches shall include: North arrow; name and location of principal roadways; shall be at scale of 1" = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting; identification of the subject site; legend or key, if applicable. All oversized documents and attachments must be folded so as to fit into a legal -size folder. For all oversized exhibits, at least one copy must be submitted at 8 -%z x 11 inches. All exhibits and attachments to the petition must include a title and exhibit # or letter, and must be referenced in the petition. 7 02/2002 1 A-144-4, HT106-1 � Exhibit IV.B. Proposed Growth Management Plan Text d) Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non - residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non - residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non - residential and residential areas. (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 26, 2004 The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non - residential use (zoned or developed); • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the non - residential use, except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22 GGE Unit 97 ; • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; and • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code, except for libraries and museums; except that a transitional conditional use may be requested on Tract 22, GGE Unit 97 and • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing residential uses. (VIII) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2004 -71 on October 71, 2004 All t VA, VA., I � VA.2 AND VA.,;]4, Exhibit V.A. Land Use The subject property is presently developed with a single family residence. Immediately north is Immokalee Road and directly across Immokalee Road is commercial and residential development, which is located within the Quail II PUD. To the east is vacant Estates zoned property. To the south is Autumn Oaks Lane and directly across Autumn Oaks Lane is a single family home on an Estates zoned lot. To the west is an essential service use utilized as a Sprint telephone switching facility. The proposed land use change to permit development of a conditional use is compatible with nearby developed and undeveloped properties. The text amendment to the Golden Gate Estates Master Plan is specific to the subject 2.6± acre parcel and does not permit similar conditional uses throughout Golden Gate Estates. l /� I III I �� I1� I J � � f � I _ I i ('I III (� r� I III ( �1�1� 'I i' 1J (\`� EXHIBIT V.B.1 EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP SUBJECT SITE: ESTATES =2.63 ACRES MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMONALEE ROAD GOLDEN GATE I SR. -84 PIN RIDG RD. MINNNINNA LEGEND TDI CD ,.L T�x All o/ a a EDEN CATS SANTA BARBARA S' a GATE YENCI Pp1uERCiAALLA5uB015TH'- . IyRPn DVEVUv AMENDED .-NII 11 MIT, COLDEN I IN 111MASK, 11 RM ■ AMENDED PARCI P PART 'T C�I/.1 SR91nSIRiCI EVAN. UU IIJISP IN'l uR114J PISCFHIinI ■ COUNEAEAL SuBOISmiCI zoo suORAIT o Al a Al coMU1cau LT cws_�HH00° TECHNICAL S PREPARED By NVAPHICA M' IIPPDaI SECTION oc DEVELOPMENT ax menTwExuL zcawces oTV lelox IDIR. EILE LLfLO- 2W5 -I.DVL DPIE ]/2005 I .1 R 26 R 27 E k i =1 B D mo AST ` �xsER rsxPRUIw� E PUxv ESIVE vl B : Pa v . A DP DR T Ix A J SO EGTPROPERTY NAPLES IMMOKAIEE ROAD ANN IA El m � ND VANDERBILi BEACH ROAD m $ u AD EXHIBIT V.B.1 EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP SUBJECT SITE: ESTATES =2.63 ACRES MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMONALEE ROAD GOLDEN GATE I SR. -84 PIN RIDG RD. MINNNINNA o/ a SDIST11cr SANTA BARBARA S' G.G. PNWT. AMENDED .-NII 11 MIT, Ee IN 111MASK, 11 RM n� DELVER GATE PARK"' RARE DAVS BONLLVARD EXHIBIT V.B.1 EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP SUBJECT SITE: ESTATES =2.63 ACRES MAP 2 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP NAPLES IMMONALEE ROAD GOLDEN GATE I SR. -84 BSIIBDIV &T OIL WELL ROAD BWLEVARD ED AS AN AD AD AD R 28 1 I PARK MINNNINNA a4reED xnv ANTI APRIL ax[ AMENDED .-NII 11 MIT, IN 111MASK, 11 RM 11I MAY 9 AMENDED PARCI P PART AMENDED —TIMMIN 11 'All zoo o Al a Al rLL 'ED' I.D AN TECHNICAL S PREPARED By NVAPHICA M' IIPPDaI SECTION — DEVELOPMENT ax menTwExuL zcawces oTV lelox IDIR. EILE LLfLO- 2W5 -I.DVL DPIE ]/2005 I .1 R 26 R 27 E BSIIBDIV &T OIL WELL ROAD BWLEVARD ED AS AN AD AD AD R 28 1 z yv ROLHill jj7 a f'F 4 :D O m w m L 0 0 z w N z r LJ m A A 4 {T - 9+s.,• f d h u \ ,I 1 W �ilfs� P III O " q E R z d M g fMb @R. ro M ^: R m �,❑ ran R ^- ����00� moo Inc P Fa - gp €g A'p�n AN 4r02g q_ F €A" " " p n a e f e I j, , z r ®I�u� 11109 ° ❑ ® ®oJm MA ,� r� A JAM . sl �. � `'��•�� '�' SIS1 n g I I GSM Ilfljll'_'Ilyl'flllfp z yv ROLHill jj7 a f'F 4 :D O m w m L 0 0 z w N z r LJ m A A 4 {T - 9+s.,• f d h u \ ,I 1 W �ilfs� P III O " q E R z DPOC COUNTY '1 RRDWAR0 COUNTY d M g fMb @R. ro M ^: R m �,❑ ran R ^- ����00� moo Inc P Fa - gp €g A'p�n AN 4r02g q_ F €A" " " p n a e f e I j, , z ®I�u� 11109 ° ❑ ® ®oJm DPOC COUNTY '1 RRDWAR0 COUNTY S Fs 1 I S aG t � s lS i Is Us i >n o z y _ z S 9b 1 S Lb 1 S 9b 1 M14 Em— ,m. Dm m N x > m ° N y 9 z ~ N y C lot, m C D m � m m r m D o g ^: R m S Fs 1 I S aG t � s lS i Is Us i >n o z y _ z S 9b 1 S Lb 1 S 9b 1 M14 Em— ,m. Dm m N x > m ° N y 9 z ~ N y C lot, m C D m � m m r m D o FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH EXHIBIT V.C.1, Vegetation Discussion The subject parcel was inspected and a vegetation map prepared to reflect existing site conditions. The mapping is according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCCS) and is attached. The following is a description of the communities found: 110 Residential This portion of the site contains a house with associated fill, and landscape vegetation. No native vegetation was found in these areas. 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods This upland forested community is dominated by Florida Slash pine found in the canopy, little or no understory. The groundcover vegetation is dominated by Mexican Clover. Other vegetation noted in these areas includes sword fern, smilax, Wedelia, crow's feet, Brazilian pepper, ear leaf acacia, and grape vine. 740 Disturbed Lands This area includes the cleared and open filled areas on the site. Some scattered pines are present. The groundcover is dominated by Mexican Clover. Other vegetation is scattered, but included Spanish needles, crow's feet, button weed, Bermuda grass, Wedelia and open ground. 814 Roads and Trails This area includes a portion of the Autumn Oaks Lane Right of Way. FLUCFCS TABLE. Code Description Acreage 110 Residential 1.1 ac 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods 0.3 ac 740 Disturbed Areas 0.9 ac 814 Roads and Trails 0.3 ac 2.6 acres Soils Discussion The soils on the property have been mapped by the Natural Recourses Conservation Commission (NRCS). See attached map for NRCS mappings. These mappings are general in nature, but can provide a certain level of information about the site as to the possible extent of wetland area. The following is a summary of the soils found on the site. SOILS TABLE. Soil ID Number Soil Type Hydric 2 1 HOLOPAW Fine Sand Limestone Substratum Yes N Scale: 1" = 100' FL UCFCS LEGEND 110 Residential ( 11 ac) 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods (03 ac) 740 Disturbed Areas (0.9 ac) 814 Roads and Trails (0.3 ac) °yawn 9y: Date: Category E °y'B" First Congregational Church /Ie�nvironmental � Job Number Scala: Gnsultants, Inc. , 2006 -162 ° _ 57 couhN Exhibit V.C.1 - FLUCFCS Map h�yxt 4;7. aet.,,. v�umn i�u�ux�wn 29/48 S /26E COIIBr Page Exhibit N Scale: 1" = 100' 411 740 110 4119 4119 814 FL UCFCS LEGEND 110 Residential ( 11 ac) 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods (0.3 ac) 740 Disturbed Areas (0.9 ac) 814 Roads and Trails (0.3 ac) tx a by: Oate: Category Page B °'' °" First Congregational Church E °"mental < < Job N mba. Scale: Co "swcaats, Inc. zoSam = ty Exhibit V.C.1 - FLUCFCS Mann Er6lbll S/r/0 Co..11 Y IIIMq Ma'ire Yrir #xrn.5urie 1, I,. MV[rx. fL l.Ii I'39)JIR -0GIl 2948 S�26E ii °llBi N Scale: t" = 100' (2) - HOLOPAW Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum SOILS LEGEND (2) - HOLOPAW Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum (HYDRIC) Bolan L nvironmental.� Consultants, Inc. �• Drawn 6y: Date: Category First Congregational Church Exhibit V.C.1 -SAILS Map Page Job Number 2006 -162 Scale: - 'County Fxhblt SRS ll U(x)M�'�rvl'�r.AUw�'.1��1�r4, Pi M)v�'a. FL I1 I.39j YlYiM]I 701AG CMC C r e.., First Congregational Church Section 29; Township 48 S; Range 26 E Collier County, Florida Protected Species Survey Exhibit V.C.2 Boylan Zip Environme a1L, Consultants, c. Welland & Wildlife Surveyv,"anmenm(Permi(fin�, /mpact .rsessmens 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, Florida, 33966 Phone :( 239) 418 -0671 Fax :( 239) 418 -0672 December 4, 2006 Page 1 of INCRODUCTION One environmental scientist from Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc conducted a field investigation on the 2.5t acre property on December 4, 2006. The purpose of the field investigation was to identify the presence of protected species and habitat. The site is located in portions of Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The site is situated south of Immokalee Road and east of Oaks Boulevard. SURVEY METHODOLOGY Where possible, the species survey was conducted using the parallel belt transect survey methodology discussed in the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission publication "Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large -scale Development in Florida." This method is comprised of several step process. First, vegetation communities or land -uses on the study area are delineated on an aerial photograph using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCFCS). Next, the FLUCFCS codes are cross- referenced with a Protected Species List. This species list names the protected species that have a probability of occurring in that particular FLUCFCS community. With a list of the potential listed plants and animals, each FLUCFCS community is searched - in the field for these species. An intensive pedestrian survey is conducted using meandering & belt transects and 10 x 50 binoculars as a means of searching for plants and animals. In addition, periodic "stop -look- listen" and quiet stalking methods are conducted for animals. Signs or sightings of these species are then recorded. Particular attention was placed upon locating potential fox squirrel nests, gopher tortoise burrows, locating RCW cavity trees, and eagle's nests within the forested portions of the property. Nearly 100 percent of the property that was considered as potential tortoise habitat was surveyed. SITE CONDITIONS The survey was conducted between the hours of 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. The temperature was 78 °F and calm with partly cloudy during the field investigation. The site was partially developed and also disturbed. No indigenous communities were located, however native Florida Slash Pines were present in the canopy over a small portion of the site. In general, the property is composed of a small home with associated landscape vegetation and filled or disturbed areas with pine canopy with no understory. Listed below are the vegetation communities or land -uses identified on the site as shown on the attached protected species survey map. See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation 1999) for definitions. Page 2 of 4 110 Residential This portion of the site contains a house with associated fill, and landscape vegetation. No native vegetation was found in these areas. 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods This upland forested community is dominated by Florida Slash pine found in the canopy, little or no understory. The groundcovcr vegetation is dominated by Mexican Clover. Other vegetation noted in these areas includes sword fem, smilax, Wedelia, crow's feet, Brazilian pepper, ear leaf acacia, and grape vine. 740 Disturbed Lands This area includes the cleared and open filled areas on the site. Some scattered pines are present. The groundcover is dominated by Mexican Clover. Other vegetation is scattered, but included Spanish needles, crow's feet, button weed, Bermuda grass, Wedelia and open ground. 814 Roads and Trails This area includes a portion of the Autumn Oaks Lane Right of Way. SPECIES PRESENCE During our field survey for protected species on the property, we did not observe any protected species. The various listed species that may occur in the vegetation communities or land -use types found on the property have been tabulated on the attached table. DISCUSSION We did not observe any other protected species or signs thereof during our field investigation. No other species were observed during the survey. This site is located adjacent to a major roadway to the north and a smaller side road to the south. No development was noted to the east. Due to the lack of contiguous and native habitat which would allow for listed species to thrive, it is unlikely any listed species would inhabit the property. Page 3 of 4 Table 1. Protected species having the potential to occur in the corresponding FLUCFCS community or land -types with corresponding field survey results. FLUCCS Potential Listed Species % Coverage Present Absent Density Visibility (ft) 110 Burrowing Owl 100 X 40 Gopher Tortoise 100 X 40 411 Beautiful Pawpaw 100 X 40 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel 100 X 40 Eastern Indigo Snake 100 X 40 Fakahatchce Burmannia 100 X 40 Florida Black Bear 100 X 40 Florida Coontic 100 X 40 Florida Panther 100 X 40 Gopher Frog 100 X 40 Gopher Tortoise 100 X 40 Red - Cockaded 100 X 40 Woodpecker Satinleaf 100 X 40 Southeastern American 100 X 40 Kestrel Twisted Air Plant 100 X 40 740 Burrowing Owl 100 X 40 Gopher Tortoise 100 X 40 814 NONE 100 40 Page 4 of 4 N Scale: 1" = 100' FL UCFCS LEGEND 110 Residential (1.1 ac) 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods (0.3 ac) 740 Disturbed Areas (0.9 ac) 814 Roads and Trails (0.3 ac) TRANSECTS Drawn ay: Dale: .Category F oy,a" y�,,,,,,��� First Congregational Church !�aviroameatal +� Job Number scale: l.onaWtanta, Inc. \ zoos -162 1" = 1 Exhibit V.C.2 - PSS Marri� e umw a wage ,mww rra. Sam county r' nnpvt A— .wb ri. 29/48St26E Collier N Scale: V— 100' I i 110 I L— I I I 74__J I L� 4119 _ 411 FL UCFCS LEGEND 110 Residential ( 1.1 ac) I n I i 4119 Disturbed Pine Flatwoods (0.3 ac) 740 Disturbed Areas (0.9 ac) 814 Roads and Trails (0.3 ac) Q TRANSECTS Buylen Environmental �_ -- nsultents, Inc. •.rww •.MCI, .�,�.. IIINq Min r.Y�,Fvii �,SUrla'J. Fl (_`)9f11,1001 urawn by: Oats: Category First Congregational Church Exhibit V.C.2 - Pss Map Page Job Number 2006 -162 S.I. 1" = 100, exn�bn Srr/R 29/485/26E County Collie( _0 RNG 261 PNC. 27 �l 30 ...: ❖: ❖: • .O 4 O •.O 00 . . . . . . . . : ❖: ❖ +: ❖: p •: ; i 26 25 30 29 1000024- 32 33 34 35 36 31 22 �l IMr MP AREAL OF H= SW QUADRANGLE RCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABHXrY (D 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 32 33 34 35 36 31 22 IMr MP AREAL OF H= SW QUADRANGLE RCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABHXrY (D • • USGS CORKSCREW SW: DATA SHEET General Description: This quadrangle lies in the northwestern portion of Collier County, • bordered by Lee County at the north. It is situated within the Flatwoods Zone. Most of the eastern portion of the trap area is contained within Corkscrew Swamp and Bird Rookery Swamp. The non - wetland area is largely devoted to mixed agricultural and low density residential use. A large gravel pit is located due north of SR 846, east of SR 951. Interstate 75 runs north/south along the western edge of the quadrangle. • • Previous Work: There have been five professional surveys conducted within this quadrangle. • These include the Woodlands tract ( 41396 - Almy and Deming 1987), the Wilshire Lakes development site ( #2673 - Penton 1991), the Naples mine (#4927 - Ahny et al. 1997), and the • Bay West Nursery ( 95084 - Almy and White 1997). In addition, the Bay West Site (8CR200) • was the focus of previous archaeological salvage excavation (Beriault et al. 1981). Nine sites • were recorded as a result of the survey of the Piper parcel ( 43948 - Carr et al. 1994). 0 Recorded/Reported Sites: "there are 10 archaeological sites located within this quad (see Site • Inventory Sheet). The Bay West Site is an unusual mortuary site which yielded human burials from deep within a muck pond. A possible campsite was also recorded near the muck pond. The • Piper tract survey resulted in eight black dirt midden sites being recorded; three of these also had • associated sand mounds. The ninth site recorded by that survey was a burial mound. " = Discussion/Recommendations: Based on the predictive model, the generally low and poorly drained conditions, tlatwoods vegetation, and absence of rapidly draining hammock soils, the Corkscrew SW quadrangle is deemed to have a low site potential. No areas have been shaded as • probability zones. One possible historic period archaeological site, "Mule Pen Camp ", may be located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, as per the 1954 soil survey. This • locality (approximate) is denoted by a "X" within a circle on the Probability Map. Archaeological 0 reconnaissance survey, including ground surface inspection and limited judgmental testing, is • recommended for this area. • • • • • • • • • • •'+ _• • R� • • I• I• • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • J • • • USGS CORKSCREW SW: Site No. Site Name SITE INVENTORY SHEET Type(s) Comments CR00200 Bay West C CR00755 Piper 91 A CR00756 Piper #2 A CR00757 Piper #3 A CR00758 Piper #4 A CR00759 Piper #5 A C/H CR00760 Piper #6 C/H CR00761 Piper #7 A,H CR00762 Piper #8 A CR00763 Piper #9 A,H w/ou �T Exhibit V.D.5. Growth Management The proposed text change does permit intensification of land uses on the subject site, by providing for the opportunity to seek conditional use approval for churches and other community facility uses. However, the amendment affects only 2.6± acres of property, which is located in close proximity to urban services and adjacent to properties utilized for essential public services. WIN WA .- EXHIBIT V.E.I. PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The subject Growth Management Plan Amendment proposes to permit a 6,000 square foot/300 seat church on the 2.6+ acre property that comprises this portion of the Transitional Conditional Use Subdistrict land use category. It is expected that this project will continence development by 2008 with anticipated buildout in 2009. Potable Water: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Potable Water established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this site is provided by an existing private water well. The church is proposing to continue use of the private facility. This Project will have no impact on the Collier County Regional Water System. Sanitary Sewer: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Sanitary _- Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this site is provided by an existing private septic system. The church is proposing to continue use of the private facility. This Project will have no impact on the Collier County Regional Sewer System. Arterial and Collector Roads: The proposed project generates less than 1000 annual average daily trips and less than 100 trip ends during the weekday peak periods. The project is not expected to create significant impact to roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage: The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Drainage established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Drainage are as follows: F:\PROJ -PLANNING DOCS \1st CONG CIIURCH NAPLES\APPLICATION \LOSDOC.dw FCCON Drainage LOS Standard Future Development (subsequent to January 1989) — 25 year, 3 day storm Existing Development (prior to January 1989) — current service level Available Inventory as of 10/11/05 311 Canal Miles Required Inventory as of FY2010 347 Canal Miles Platmed CIE FY 06 -10 $76,959,750 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) N/A The proposed development in the amendment area will be designed to comply with the 25 year, 3 day storm routing requirements. Solid Waste: The subject project is located outside the urban boundary with standards for Solid Waste established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards and 2005 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for Solid Waste are as follows: Solid Waste LOS Standard Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at average disposal rate /previous 5 years Available Inventory as of FY2005 3,861,672 Site Tons Required Inventory as of FY2010 779,099 Site Tons Planned CIE FY 06 -10 794,814 Site Tons 5 -Year Surplus or (Deficit) 3,877,387 Site Tons No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities are anticipated from this 2.6- acre conditional use project. Parks: Community and Regional There are no proposed residential uiuts associated with this newly created land use category, therefore there are no projected community or regional park impacts. FA\PROJ -PLANNING ROCS \Ist CONG CHURCH NAPLM\APPLICATIOMLOSDOCAm FCCON At 1 r 1 Ii • 0 w 0 w w w w w o 0 boa rte, 1` ?JQ l-1I9NACI 00 5 $ W x Q d d) -- LL. Z C7VOL MN T ro _ _ w m III r rr f, Y v i [ Q 0 Z <� Z j V _i I, ¢ ' a 7¢ o # 1 Q• � I J U m L ' ° U - CIVON NOISONIAII boa rte, 1` ?JQ l-1I9NACI 00 M n wlIV l fWVIV, b � w �� 1 1 Ilk 1010 Q Q►0 —a a 5 $ W x �L m� y —VH -1113�C] d) -- LL. 0 C7VOL MN T ro r rr f, Y v i _i I, n a L ' ° CIVON NOISONIAII VFWa IONII s Cld Ind— I210dbld M n wlIV l fWVIV, b � w �� 1 1 Ilk 1010 Q Q►0 —a a W x �L m� y —VH -1113�C] 0 C7VOL MN T ro M n wlIV l fWVIV, b � w �� 1 1 Ilk 1010 Q Q►0 —a a f Sk Exhibit V.E.3. Proposed Services The proposed conditional use will either utilize a well and septic system or connect to potable water and sewer facilities presently available in the Immokalee Road right -of -way. Due to the proposed use for a church facility, no level of service impacts result from the proposed text change. 1111111111 11191E�li 11 l�� al H w W a O K a C) U W 0 (D v A - �- - - ol e e i _C4 1 rl�� : ,Y n�r q vll T F,--, .. .�- III _IIIIIIL —'�J � I J J � ' XOf9b mbuloaoyvo i iols�y 6uyou6izap a s Fµno� ..Iloaayl a o sdory 611yoymd Iw 6oloaoymy�snmislry a4l S39a bSFilU NNINNZ -NSISIn3N :SV 1 S a � n o N 0 o- _ -- -_ a N Z LL O >° H 0 a z g w a ' Z j i a: o O n U � U) i LL W n� n i H w W a O K a C) U W 0 (D v A - �- - - ol e e i _C4 1 rl�� : ,Y n�r q vll T F,--, .. .�- III _IIIIIIL —'�J � I J J � ' XOf9b mbuloaoyvo i iols�y 6uyou6izap a s Fµno� ..Iloaayl a o sdory 611yoymd Iw 6oloaoymy�snmislry a4l S39a bSFilU NNINNZ -NSISIn3N :SV r �11111111111 lj� q�!p; lill (ifil This Instrument Prepared By: John Paulich IIl, Esq. Paulich, Slack & Wolff, P.A. 5147 Castello Drive Naples, FI, 34103 Parcel I.D. Number: 41931040004 WARRANTY DEED 3725391 OR; 3921 PG; 0001 RICORDID in O1IICIAL RICORDS of COLLIIR COUNTY, IL 11/02/2009 at 08:42AM DWIGHT 1. RROC[, CLIRI CONS 980000.00 IIC 111 18,50 DOC -.10 6860.00 Retn: ROSS LANIIR DIIIII IT AL 599 97H STRUT 113DO NAILIS 11 31102 THIS WARRANTY DEED made the day of October, 2005, by Don W. Turrentine and Shira A. Turrentine, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantor, to 1" Congregational Church whose post office address is: 5100 N. Tamiami hereinafter called the L, WITNESSETH: Th Grantor, for and �sin of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, t whereof is here 0 dged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, i� and confirms tCi e Grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, v' 11� C Tract 22, of GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 97, Less the North 50 feet of said Tract 22, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 96, of the Public Records of COLLIER County, Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and To Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004; and subject to all easements, restrictions and reservations common to the subdivision. * ** OR; 3921 PG; 0002 **t In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed & delivered in our presence: #1 Witness #1 Printed Name *js 2 Signature Witness #2 Pri nted Na STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLI! The foregoing by Don W. Turrentine Who are personall,. Who have provide DON W. TURRENTINE 0 SHIRA A. TURRENTINE My Commission Expires:. NO WY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORI"eal) W/Expires: Janine M. Decker Commission # DDggb451 JUNE 30, 2009 Bonded Thty Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. Current Ownership Folio No. 41931040004 Map 11 Property Addressli 6225 AUTUMN OAKS LN Owner Name 1ST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF Addresses NAPLES INC 5100 TAMIAMI TRL N GOLD LESS TE EST UNIT 97 I R 22 FL Section Township I Range Strap NO 29 48 F 26 A 2.6 3629 IF 356500 22 03825 Sub tJo. 356500 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 97 ' "�: Mi)1?geArea ' Use Code 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 145 12.7013 2005 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Land Value F-- $ 243,100.00 Date Book - Page Amount ( +) Improved Value $ 149,063.00 11 1 2005 3921 - 1 $ 990,00, (_) Market Value $ 392,163.00 1 F 05 / 1 bIi 11 2178 -2102 $ 149,401 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 194,234.00 1211995 2125 -1499 § 38,50 ( =) Assessed Value $ 197,929.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 25,000.00 1 =) Taxable Value $ 172,929.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. VL1. L CVUY U.V715( 01111 I. bVfthi L, IYIVVIILL W r��`� •' u Gleada E. Hood Secretary of State August 25, 2004 MATTHEW M. LISS, ESQ. SWIFT CURRIE, LLP, SUITE 300 1355 PEACHTREE ST. NE ATLANTA, GA 30309 II V. YLI 1. J The Articles of Incorporation for FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. were filed on August24, 2004 and assigned document number N04000008321. Please refer to this number whenever corresponding with this office regarding the above corporation. The certification you requested is enclosed. PLEASE NOTE: Compliance with the following procedures is essential to maintaining your corporate status_ Failure to do so may result in dissolution of your corporation. A corporation annual report must be filed with this office between January 1 and May 1 of each year beginning with the calendar year following the year of the filing /effective date noted above and each year thereafter. Failure to file the annual report on time may result in administrative dissolution of your corporation. A federal employer identification (FEI) number must be shown on the annual report form prior to its filing with this office. ntact the Internal Revenue Service to insure that you receive the FEI number in time to file the annual report. To obtain a FEI number, contact the IRS at 1- 800 -829 -3676 and request form SS-4. Should your corporate mailing address change, you must notify this office in writing, to Insure important mailings such as the annual report notices reach you. Should you have any questions regarding corporations, please contact this office at the address given below. Neysa Culligan, Document Specialist New Filings Section Letter Number: 004A00051940 Division of Corporations - P.O. BOX 6327 - Tallahassee, Florida 32314 Confirmation Report— Memory Send Date & Time: Sep -08 -2004 08:18am Tel line 262 728 2113 Machine ID CENTURY21 SKANDIA Jab number 780 Date & Time Sep -98 08:I6am To 912392614691 Number of pages 002 Start time Sep -08 0e:17am End time Sep -08 00:18am Pages sent 002 Status OK Job number 790 ** SEND SUCCESSFUL * ** S a p O 6 O 4 -W a 6 O p SEY_ 2. 2004 6:OS PM SWIFT. CURRIE. MCCHEE 1 certify the attach0d Cs a true and copy of the Articles of incorparatron of FIRST GONG REGA'1"fONAL CHUf H CF NAPLES, INC., a FioAda corporation, Mad on August 24. 2004, a shown by V'fa r: rds of thfs oP - 7Ta doCalml t number of this corporation is NO4 0008 21. T � ♦YTX G Fatah of fho Sots Hot. thl.fda at Taiiahassaa, ltta CapRd, this the Twenty -fIT[h day of August. 2004 p_ 1'] RESOLUTIONS OF THE INCORPORATOR OF FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC. ADOPTED BY WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF AN ORGANIZATION MEETING Pursuant to Florida Statues Section 617.0205(6)(b), the Incorporator of First Congregational Church of Naples, Inc., a Florida not - for -profit corporation (the "Corporation "), hereby adopts the following resolutions to be effective as of August 24, 2004, in lieu of an organization meeting, and consents to the corporate actions contemplated thereby: I. DIRECTORS. RESOLVED, that the following individuals, to the exclusion of all others, are hereby elected Directors of the Corporation, to serve for the ensuing year or until such Directors' successors are duly elected, qualified and accept office: Neil E. Bennett Les Wicker Art Green Deborah Camera Patricia Dusesoi H. COMPLETION OF ORGANIZATION. RESOLVED, that the above elected Directors are hereby directed and empowered pursuant to Florida Statues Section 617.0205 to complete the organization of the Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, who is the Incorporator of the Corporation, has hereunto set his hand. Neil E. Bennett JCr. L•(VV4 0 :0)rNI on l r i,;,vNN i C, mbnCt NU, q I I r. 0 ARTICLES OF 1 CORPORATION C U P Y In Compliance with Chapter 617, F.S., (Not for Profit) ARTICLE I NAME The name of the corporation shall be: First Congregational Church of Naples, Inc. ARTICLE II PRINCIPAL OFFICE y, r—M M Q S� The place of business and mailing address of this corporation shall be: ro >>, principal r Nor rn-<r 27761 Riverwalk Way Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 (until otherwise determined) a MMM • ARTICLE III PURPOSE rti The purpose for which the corporation is organized is: An to further its members' truly and sincerely held religious beliefs through charitable, benevolent, eduZb:onal7and cultural means in accordance with the "Florida Not tar Profit Corporation Act" as well as Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. ARTICLE IV, MANNER OF ELECTION The manner is which the directors are elected or appointed: In the Bylaws to Fla. Stat. § 617.0202(1)(d). shall be stated pursuant ARTICLE V IMIIAL DIRECTORS AND OR OFFICERS List neme(s), addresses) and specific title(s): Pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 617.0202(2) et seq., this listing Is not required to appear on this corporation's Articles of Incorporation; however, this listing will appear in the corporation's Bylaws. o.........- ._ —'--- The a_1me and Florida street address_ (P.O. Sox NOT acceptable) of the registered agent is: Neil Bennett 27761 Riverwalk Way Boatta springs, Florida 34134 AR47CLE VII RATOR The name and address of the Incorporator is: Neil Bennett 27761 Riverwalk Way Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 KR+ 4YktYKY# ittRik# Ykiik; itirttk# kiKKkiki* rtrtrtK# kirtrtiYYkKitrtiRktttrtKkKkYt ►tYtkkkirtKitikitL Having been named as regitrered aafg�ent to accept service a %procers for the above stated eorporadon at tke pfaee designated in thts cerdly, e, jam fam•u°,rJT and accept the appovrhnent as rcgittered agent and agree to ad in this caparlp', i yaneSignatute/Registered Agent Date /Ne t 08"(5 —r'`/ Signature lloorpoMlor Date Neil. Bennett RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to establish the status of the Corporation as an organization exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. DL Pavmcnt or Reimbursement of Expenses on Behalf of the Corporation. WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the officers of the Corporation will pay or incur reasonable expenses in promoting and administering the charitable purposes and functions of the Corporation and in fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of their office, including expenses for travel, transportation and similar purposes paid or incurred solely for the benefit of the Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Directors hereby authorize and empower the officers of the Corporation to pay or incur such reasonable expenses as the officers deem necessary and in the best interest of the Corporation; RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers are authorized and empowered, in turn, to authorize such other officers and employees of the Corporation as they may determine to pay or incur reasonable expenses on behalf of the Corporation; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Corporation pay or reimburse the officers of the Corporation and such other officers and employees as the officers may designate for all such necessary expenses upon presentation by them, from time to time, of itemized accounting of such expenses. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, who are the Directors of the Corporation, have hereunto set their hand. Neil E. Bennett Les Wicker Art Green Deborah Camera Patricia Dusesoi JA LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Q Grady Minor and Associates P.A. (Name of Agent -typed or printed) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in the Application. Signed: / /L�,Z Z L Date: -3 (Name of Owner(s) of-Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant /V, v /-- - /�, -P,,h. f)�- Name - Typed or Printed STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF( Sworn to and subscribed before ine this day of NO V 2006 By cUUU Q I (Notary Publi4 0 MY COMMISSIN EXPIRES: CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced FLOM* DR )V EFL 0'-' identification and MMRIEGAYER Y?t' MY COMMISsIDN M DD 609079 did take an Oath EXPIRES: OaoherN,2010 Rh did not take an Oath •••" NOTICE - RE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 -False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term. 9 02/2002 ��� �� � � �� � �� �� �� �� i J i / :UANDERBILT UACATION RENTALS FAX NO. :239 596 4312 _ Dec. 05 2005 12:04PM P1 �11lnKl'MN "1'Il "- I �' i it �II i Dear Dr. Wicker, Thank you for extending to the Oakes Advisory Board and our neighborhood's citizens the opportunity to hear the plans of the First Congregational Church of Naples for the former Turrentine property at 6225 Autumn Oaks Lane. We appreciate your sensitivity to the preferences of your new neighbors. If I may recap the information that you and Mr. Fondessy, Mr. Amon, and Mr.Linderer presented at an informal meeting October 4`s, 2005 and that you repeated for our official meetingNovember.l", 2005: The Church intends to pursue any zoning change that would be necessary to construct a permanent house of worship on the property in question. The style of the structure would be "colonial" in keeping with the tradition of the First Congregational Church organization. Once constructed, further expansion of the facility is not expected, as the usual policy of the Church is build a new facility in a new location rather than to expand an existing facility. The facility would be used on Sundays and on Wed_ evenings. You do not intend to operate a school, day -care, or youth center on the site. The consensus of our members present at.the meeting, including several homeowners from nearby Autumn Oaks properties, was that they would support tite Church's plans provided that: Access to the new church would be restricted to the Immokalee Road side of the property. There would be no access from Autumn Oaks Lane. Reasonable efforts would be made to control noise on the property and to secure the rear of the property, whether these shall involve vegetation buffers, fencing or other measures. The Oakes Advisory Board and our members would appreciate being kept informed of your progress in planning your new church. . The Board voted to prepare this letter for you to use as you see fit as plans mature for your new church. We wish you and your congregation the best of luck in your endeavors. ' h I Ilk z a °oiy i Vlypn m Ts22 � ri n o oa m z� m I mo,n� m ti a a] ai x o� o O � f m m z � o Z ��K 6mAa n gym= a Seu c� A "O y 9 Zn O O Z C) N o m � <M <m � D z O Zc m a , x ----------— — _ — — — s' rn os ci, p n u rr R —— \ GRASS °ARRIING 0 I � l QJ ICI �• —�� - -.v uj ( Y ( ( I E I x Y I i T a Al I I II (�+ IANOSG to' I H V C NNUSL PE BU.'FER I � °f m Z. _ N I N K 0 n m A O