Loading...
HEX Final Decision 2021-53HEX NO. 2021-53 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION DATE OF HEARING. October 28, 2021 PETITION. PETITION NO. VA-PL20200000998 — Request for variances associated with post -hurricane reconstruction of Walker's Coon Key Marina, specifically for four variances from dimensional requirements of Section 4.02.01 of the Land Development Code for the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District: [a] from the required building separation of 40 feet between the existing Ship Store Building and existing Boat Storage Building #2 to allow separation of 15 feet; [b] from the required building separation of 59 feet between the existing Boat Storage Building #2 and existing Boat Storage Building #3 to allow separation of 34 feet; [c] from the required separation of 59 feet for existing Boat Storage Building #3 and proposed reconstruction of Boat Storage Building #4 to allow separation of 50 feet; and [d] variance from the required side setback of 25 feet to allow a side setback of 6 feet for proposed reconstruction of Boat Storage Building #4. The request is for property located at 604 Palm Avenue in Goodland in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION. Petitioner's "Walker's Coon Key Marina" requests variances for 3 boat storage facilities (buildings 2, 3, and 4 on the attached plans). STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Approval with conditions. FINDINGS. 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(2) of the Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of the County Administrative Code. 2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all County and state requirements. 3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04. Page 1 of 7 4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person. 5. The applicant sent a notification letter dated July 29, 2021, to property owners within 150 feet of the subject site. The notice letter mailing included the Goodland Civic Association, Inc. Notice about the October 28, 2021, Hearing Examiner hearing was provided by newspaper advertisement, mailed notice to owners within 500 feet of the site, and posting of a public notice sign on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing. 6. This Petition is a companion to Petition No. DR-PL20180002114, site plan with deviations - redevelopment Walker's Coon Key Marina, which will be addressed under a separate HEX Decision. 7. The County representative introduced the Petition and staff recommendations, followed by Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative, and then public comment. There were objections to the Petition at the public hearing, most notably from residents of the abutting Coon Key Pass Fishing Village, and its condominium association represented by Zachary Lombardo, Esq. and Glenn Chalder, AICP. The Fishing Village shares the Marina's east property boundary line. The waterfront Fishing Village has three stilted buildings consisting of multifamily dwellings with individual balconies. The Fishing Village and Marina have been operating as neighbors for decades. The primary point of contention is petitioner's Building #4 along the Fishing Village's western boundary. 8. Petitioner's "Walker's Coon Key Marina" requests variances to legalize and/or rebuild 3 boat storage facilities ("storage facilities") albeit taller than the previous ones, under the county's new codes, that were destroyed/damaged by Hurricanes Wilma and Irma (buildings 2, 3, and 4). Specifically, variances for the separation distances between the existing ship store (building 1) and storage facility #2 (15 feet where 40 feet is required), the separation distance between the storage facility #2 and #3 (34 feet where 59 feet is required), the separation distance between storage facility #3 and #4 (50 feet where 59 feet is required), and the side yard setback between storage facility #4 (6 feet where 25 feet is required). This redevelopment strategy linked to the Marina's companion petition for a site plan with deviations. 9. Walker's Coon Key Marina is in the small fishing community of Goodland, Florida. Goodland's population was 267 at the 2010 census and has climbed to approximately 337 in 2020, according to the United States Census Bureau, after a significant decline in 2017 following Hurricanes Wilma and Irma, both making landfall at or near Goodland. According to the United States Census Bureau, Goodland is geographically constrained village of 0.35 square miles, of which 0.15 square miles is land and 0.19 square miles is water. 10. The County's Land Development Section 9.04.03 lists the criteria for variances. The Hearing Examiner having the same authority as the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant, deny or modify any request for a variance from the regulations or restrictions of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).1 'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized. Page 2 of 7 1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that the site was permitted and developed under the January 1982 LDC standards. The development standards for this zoning district were less restrictive in that version of the LDC compared to the current LDC. The existing side setback of 6 feet needs to be maintained for the functional aspect of the site. The 50 feet between the storage buildings is at a minimum for maneuverability of the forklift to launch the boats into the water. Any reduction to this area will deem it non-functional. The 1982 LDC required a minimum 15' separation between structures with no correlation to the height of the building. There are special circumstances that apply to the site in that is has existed as a marina since the 1980s. Boat storage Buildings #2 and #3 have been reconstructed in a taller condition resulting in substandard separation between buildings. The proposed reconstruction of Building #4 would comply with separation standards if the height of the Building #4 addition is reduced to 41 feet, or if the footprint of the Building #4 addition is reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. 2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that the storage buildings on the site were destroyed by Hurricanes Wilma and Irma. The buildings are proposed to be located in the same location as the previous buildings. The natural disasters impacted the property beyond the applicant's control, and the pre-existing and permitted footprint of Building #4 within 6 feet of the eastern property line was a pre-existing condition. However, the reconstruction of buildings taller than previously constructed yielding a substandard budling separation is within the applicant's control. 3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that A literal interpretation will create a monetary hardship on the applicant if the building cannot be constructed as proposed. The number of boats stored would be greatly reduced which would make the site monetarily infeasible. Maintaining a 25 foot setback on the easterly property line will create a practical hardship for the forklift to maneuver the boats from the buildings to the water for launch. County planners do recognize that applying a 25- foot setback along the eastern property line causes hardship and practical difficulties for the applicant given that the six-foot setback along the eastern property was a pre-existing condition and the passage of time and changes to the LDC have rendered the six-foot setback nonconforming. Also, the requirement to meet the current applicable building separation standards for the existing buildings (Buildings 1, 2, and 3) would be a significant impact to the applicant. However, the reconstruction of buildings taller than previously constructed yielding a substandard budling separation is within the applicant's Page 3 of 7 control and the proposed reconstruction of Building #4 would comply with separation standards if the height of the Building #4 addition is reduced to 41 feet, or if the footprint of the Building #4 addition is reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. 4. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, and welfare? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that if this variance is the minimum variance needed to maintain the functional use of the land. Any side setback greater than 6 feet will render the site unusable for this boat storage use and make the business financially unfeasible. The variance will be the minimum required to allow for the site to function considering the existing buildings. The proposed reconstruction of Building #4 would comply with separation standards if the height of the Building #4 addition is reduced to 41 feet, or if the footprint of the Building #4 addition is reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. 5. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that the need for this variance was created by a natural disaster (Hurricanes Wilma & Irma) that render this site and business destroyed. Granting this variance will allow this site to be reconstructed and operate as it did before the natural disaster. The County Commissioners allow for this type of relief to all business that are destroyed or damaged by natural disasters. Therefore, the granting will not confer any special privileges. The granting of the variance does convey a unique privilege upon the property, but based upon the circumstances of two natural disasters, in combination of the changing of applicable development standards of the LDC County planners are of the opinion that granting of the variance to accommodate pre-existing conditions as justifiable. However, the proposed reconstruction of Building #4 would not require a variance from separation standards if the height of the Building #4 addition is reduced to 41 feet, or if the footprint of the Building #4 addition is reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. 6. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that the need for boat storage facilities and similar working waterfronts are a necessity in Collier County. The County is deficient in marina and storage facilities compared to the demands for boat storage. This facility has been a storage facility for over 30 years and this community has relied upon its existence. It is harmonious with the intent of this code as this is a commercially zoned property. The buildings are separated from Residentially zoned properties by waterways that provide access to this facility and the residential lots. It is Page 4 of 7 not injurious to the neighborhood or the public welfare. It provides a needed recreational element to allow people to access and enjoy our coastal waters without the inconvenience of driving long distances to other marina facilities located in the County. Granting of the variance for the six-foot setback along the eastern property is in recognition that this setback was a pre-existing condition and the passage of time and changes to the LDC have rendered the six-foot setback nonconforming. Granting of this variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of LDC provisions allowing relief for redevelopment in such circumstances. The LDC does not recognize height as a circumstance for which relief by deviation can be granted. The building back of the boat storage buildings taller than they previously existed can be considered impactful to neighboring views. The taller buildings however comply with the current LDC standards establishing maximum height of 75 feet in the C-4 zoning district; yet the taller buildings render the site noncompliant with applicable building separation standards. The proposed reconstruction of Building #4 would comply with separation standards if the height of the Building #4 addition is reduced to 41 feet, or if the footprint of the Building #4 addition is reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. 7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that other than the easterly property line, this facility is separated from other development by waterways that allow for water access to this subject working waterfront property and those properties on the opposite banks. The subject property's location at the end of a peninsula with water on three sides is a unique condition, however the objectives of regulations that are subject to requested variances (building separation and setback) are not ameliorated by these physical characteristics. 8. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP)? The record testimony and evidence from the public hearing reflects that since the use of this land as a Marina and Storage facility is an existing use, the granting of the variance is consistent with the GMP. The GMP is silent to the issuance of a variance application and therefore the granting of the variance will not be inconsistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS. Based on a review of the record testimony and evidence including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 9.04.03 of the Land Development Code to approve Petition. Page 5 of 7 nF C'ISION_ The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition No. VA-PL20200000998, filed by Gina Green, P.A. of Gina R. Green, P.A., representing WR Real Estate LLP, with respect to the property described as 1.68± acres located at 604 Palm Avenue in Goodland in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following: • An application for variances associated with post -hurricane reconstruction of Walker's Coon Key Marina, specifically for four variances from dimensional requirements of Section 4.02.01 of the Land Development Code for the General Commercial (C-4) Zoning District: [a] from the required building separation of 40 feet between the existing Ship Store Building and existing Boat Storage Building #2 to allow separation of 15 feet; [b] from the required building separation of 59 feet between the existing Boat Storage Building #2 and existing Boat Storage Building #3 to allow separation of 34 feet; [c] from the required separation of 59 feet for existing Boat Storage Building #3 and proposed reconstruction of Boat Storage Building #4 to allow separation of 50 feet; and [d] variance from the required side setback of 25 feet to allow a side setback of 6 feet for proposed reconstruction of Boat Storage Building #4. Said changes are fully described in the Site Plan and Survey attached as Exhibit "A" and the Landscape Plan attached as Exhibit `B" are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A — Site Plan and Survey Exhibit B — Landscape Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION. 1.68± acres located at 604 Palm Avenue in Goodland in Section 18, Township 52 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida CONDITIONS. 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. The height of the Building #4 addition must be reduced to 41 feet, or the footprint of the Building #4 addition must be reduced by 9 feet to achieve a separation of 59 feet from Building #3. DISCLAIMER. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant Page 6 of 7 fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS. This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. November 24, 2 Date Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" Rip Rap SDPA 2008-AR-13409 & SDPI-PL2009002522 c EX. CONCRETE St.I,3 \ 29bNg" \ I\ c ro EX. CONCRETE I. \� \ y \ Yl s (OVse'G \ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ EX. CONCRETE \ \ \ \ U ZONING: C-4 GZO (MULTI -FAMILY) [d] 6.0"' REDUESTED VARUUJCE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS DESCRIPTION REQUIRED VARIANCE REOUEST -STANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 12 SUM OF BLUINGS HEIGH OR 15 MN 15 MIN. AST PROPERTY LINE SETBACK 125 SETBACK FROM RESDENTIAL USE 1 5 MIN. OF: CP��iL�,:LLc =LII. F+.,f:77DP.l ll:f�z•HfCf�,9rv_ recc : a: •r�• �E>�ZIC�IAT�ci� �ilf'L?7fii7•P.��£?Fi1R�ilIfIF+.ZC7F'i�73•'.S•� i7F:lli/E?ZL3#.4ng•f:1�l+ntllUl lTLSEl[:TS?— 1.54F:I•E:fEi•FZCi �Fl4i [Q'3C#AEI•' rrzQumT��rIa:��FZFt:x>F?ics ■YLfiE�; L[2 F7PIII:s67�ZC�F�[iF-23E7Z �ZC�' '1•E 1- �rs:z�*-x r:s::»<=� ;=--,.ate of OF: CP��iL�,:LLc =LII. F+.,f:77DP.l ll:f�z•HfCf�,9rv_ recc : a: •r�• �E>�ZIC�IAT�ci� �ilf'L?7fii7•P.��£?Fi1R�ilIfIF+.ZC7F'i�73•'.S•� i7F:lli/E?ZL3#.4ng•f:1�l+ntllUl lTLSEl[:TS?— 1.54F:I•E:fEi•FZCi �Fl4i [Q'3C#AEI•' rrzQumT��rIa:��FZFt:x>F?ics ■YLfiE�; L[2 F7PIII:s67�ZC�F�[iF-23E7Z �ZC�' '1•E 1- �rs:z�*-x r:s::»<=� ;=--,.ate of \ [d] 6 4.67 OVERHANG n z ./ (EXISIINC) "VARIANCE REQUEST ITEMS m 000a MOI �� � Mo ona awmworn tnuim a O101al 4Oa1 M MCOR a llll nllltaY IAm oetam na aam a as mx rcoll rMms ear is irDMa7 Wom ZCR MamMpM COMMM. 120 M� EV tWAO) mmca/",*-Hx w WAMW saws its& ossss Not Included PORTION OF UNDIVIDED BLOCK "Y" Not /nelud" PORTION OF UNDIVIDED BLOCK "Y" 14PA.— Kate:• as x EMU�� , I SCALE C 30 60 YO 1 0 a A.atae b ant Mf/10'/ AS ASO�D w n Ma+or w� vAoe Ix� NI /R rMf,C KL COnQ ? GOI aPAW 4 O' M fta C ACOMMuQ =LVt l M01{Z"m ~r yr My Lair A tar Aa ro A/ P MQQ MM RA W W MIi1 /PC IIQ12 AVtM I)A lK) ro A /Wf d M[ .wUM IWY f A1QIL Mp1Z M[TI06Y d Ir W' A AAOYf O< d0 R) AILI A col .]SO) )aT ro M[ ,tL AKo O• tAI 000uro aua ncr wm�c Pro Mc Mn Aces r]1i a Las ►L EMAL CSTATL UP n�ieli Rio mrrs AntonioTrigo, PLSNo.2982 M 7 n iMj M ;1 xaa Zl l]&y+j ;U 3VM EXHIBIT "B" / ! / ! _nL/ ISAACSON ! LANDSCAPE / ARCHREaURE / GROUP ... / a9awowlaEvoave �--�r—r.rr ! ii91US5QS WATERWAYr / �nuau yl I� ell VRG B"BUFFER -I5'WIDE / G 7 Ex. vYs 4 w - Cri Z w • j3� �_ � _II_I_ — jl ]ZL b 4 6-4 z O a U C d G20 C w "B-BUFFER -15-WIDE < ! g J \ Qou+orts vocuw ust nos < 6 -- �arwrts rourarowlvm � \J _ v¢n+c nr lw mrtw wu of wwaan.noiox maowlrtoawccEssnxr oveova loot eovnwec • uv.unow w wu wn low w•m usr. \ ww wows to eEureo.rtn d>. H O .� H 6 O TK O M \ N W N � oa++•wom�n• `y - .� •C 7J � u.aooiva \ I,fY let BASE I TIQ OVIDED BY GINA GREEN P.E. AND SQUARE'S LANDCAPING INC. - SDPA-2008-AR-13409 `- ee m.rwe 9l.w .IarEarror,�n.0 cnouv,ncrMoww uwxorseuaox wuawrvwo wnwartrw[wnmex wwwwi•orewsaow woscwe•nanec>wewoir Mo, 1 PLANT SCHEDULE Total Site Area 73,181 sf TREES AS _qn, 7 BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME ACER RUBRUM /RED MAPIF COW 25 GAL LIZE 1.75"CAL SPEC, IW-12' OA- 4' SPREAD Building Area 18.209 sf Pavement Area 49:408 sf 564 as 1 BURSERA SIMARUBA / GUMBO UMBO 25 GAL 1.75"CAL 10'.12' OA- 4' SPREAD Pervious Area 9.408 sf CE2 13 CONOCARPUSERECTS / GREEN NmONWOOO 25 GAL 1.75roN Ie'-I2.OA-4'SPREAD LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS CO 4 CHRYSOPHYLLUM OUVIORME/SATINIEAF 25 GAL 1.7SCA1 10'-12'OA-4'SPREAD MINIMUM NUMBER OF CANOPY TREES REQUIRED L__ � MB 3 MAGNOLIA GRANDFLORA'D.D. BLANCHARD' TM / SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 25 GAL 1.75CAL 10'42' OA., 4' SPREAD Bmed m 1 Tree 13000of of pervbua let area - 9.408 at Ot"—O PInM6�a4 OV 4 QUERCUS VRGNIANA / LINE OAR 25 GAL 1.75CAL 10'-12' OA..4' SPREAD I. VEHICULAR USE AREA (Section 4.06.03 B.1) 10%x 45.564 S.F.. 2.6075.F. Tot 2 TAXODIUM DISTICHUM/BALD CYPRESS 25 GAL 1.7SCAL 10'•12'OA• 4'SPREAD �4p.5.15r�6.4�5.F. p'e,wn•x Arw) lr�4Trap Mel M.4saEA M�9e) EXISTING r,,_TY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME COW ME SPEC 4.556A S.F. 1250 IsT100e SSE I SURSERA SIMARUBA/EX. GUMBO LIMBO 70 REMAIN I q—O— IP 77;�pAse)pT TMI Lwbawq An91 DLE 43 DYPSS LUIESCENS / EX. ARECA PALM TO REMAIN SHARED II. RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPINGJAM—U. -M SHRUBS tt BOTANICAL /COMMON NAME COW SrE sPK.RPACNG p•cxN.4Da.02 L.F.NA . I30 • NA Tram NA NA CE 6 CONOCARPUS ERKNS/GREEN BUTTONWOOD -SHRUB FORM IOGAL 5'OA. 3-SPREAD 4'OC pYhnrerN NTrws llReRe4) UTrTea l.lv.14e01 CR 50 CHRYSOSNANUS ICACO'RED TIP" /RED TIP COCOPLUM 3GAL Ir•2r OA 3'OC Sm AgAm4m R.O.W. III. PERIMETER SUFFERING (Aranuativoa-A.B.C-) S 60 ILER VOM00RIA'SCHLLNGS'/SCHBLINGS HOLLY 3GAL T-1f OA 2'OC SINUm 4semaTma2q Type'A'.MIn—WW1 • 10TL iD 56 TRIPSACUM%DACTYLODFS/HALFA-HATCHEE GRASS 3GAL IS•Ir OA 3'. L.F.130 • Treaa T�NA� LP.1 UT —RR —) UTer PrRN6M1 ZAF 24 7AMIA PUMILA/COONTE 3GAL IS•Ir OA 3'OC Type'B•-Minimum WW1 150.00% Op"mvAthina year-TtaP.Mayinekdeafenm. = LF.125 33 Time 33 1�lalu ling 1 ex. Tree) GROUND COVERS Ott ERL 56 BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ERNOOEA LITTORALS/GOLDEN CREEPER COW IGAL SIZE I7'•ISOA SPACING 3'OC _ N. BBUILUILDING PDIINLFI (iY�sewea pT�9 RwWa61 ERIMETER PLANTINGS • Bugdinp 1 SOD Y BOTANICAL/COMMONNAME COW SIRE SPACING ReEse 4n4p.pSAA) YN 2119 SP PASPALUM NOTATUM / BAHIA GRASS SOD PALETTE 226 L.F. x 25%. x tr 565 SF 50 SF Fq•tlRp PYYpRq) 1Pr•,bR61 SF $42 SF SIENOTAPHRUM SECUNDATUM/RORTLAM SOD SOD PALETTE a"FS /A0D-2n 2 lap feM4YanPY�aeaRwAP TIen RRpRR61 UTbr RwNa4) Va. TREES AND SHIM REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE B.wu. Tree Spedea Required 5 a. Trem < 100%> 10', 1.75• Cal.. 4' apd. MULCH 65 Tnm ReL nor x 100% NRpuind SYMBOL DESCRIPTION fION DETDETAIL35 � N.V.etive TTe— PreRtdetl (h1aF1W one wa1YTp irea) r--10-11 T CRUSHED SEASHELL MSF 17S1Lofp-i—) b. M.S. 100% Naexo SYMBOL DESCRIPTION OTT DETAIL MU02 S SHREDDED COCO BROWN MULCH. 20.13 CT 'ALL NEW PLANTINGS ARE TO BE 100%NATIVE 'EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE REPAIRED AND/OR RETROFITTED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE 1001E COVERAGE a SEPARATION OF HIGH AND LOW WATER USE BAHIA SOD NOT TO BE IRRIGATED. 'INVASIVE PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY. 'MULCH NOT TO CONTAIN MORE THAN 25%CYPRESS. Troo AvoSDbi1iIV/Subsfitulion and Future Raplacaxnts. e LpeaMsa naaa we —.-able w row W be Tepb.-h the f ". nb t01aalrp vwleam of tram may Le aw at aWtm Cal, w G—benpW.lw Ble M Rbletl above: Green w Sher Buaw bad! Sap.Le01.%peon Floss GOlper.Ganbo Iinbo. -13Oak Red Maple,So011b0.Mo9nob awtod Oyweat. Trew rpeeleL aP C.e h Sf1PA- . Plana . mpy wb oe replied Mm mo Ows htotl above. N aow ere 10 b0 C:oae nea.xxn N pbMblp. SNut7-Gramdcover Avai !ty/Subnilutbn and Future Repplacements: SlxubLrourMCevY roabeemar.ah O b 10 may be wry 1001Er svOMlypot Pev'ahSW Rorkb Tree Staking Detail Tree Shkm N b S• rand "Nl 8.12 norft by 1e 0—r SPECIFICATIONS A/ ISAACSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GROUP TaMONI6IEYDRNE NAnES. FL UI19 1C26aM4 ` /•.Fttt Of nlaaee �r eAwm . 1100TRNggi` OND Ee�191�naaxwa Q AHLL� Mr2 2RwTIR A,b0lprr wawT�MNm�Roor ` �J L _ _ usm royvawTTerRmA. ^' ROOT BARRIER DETAIl..,A C The Contractor shall be responsible for providing a complete and operable system for the irrigation of of now landscape plantings on site. Plans and specifications may not indicate all items necessary fa the proper irrigation of the project. This shag not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to furnish tabor, materials and equipment required for a complete and proper system. The Contractor shall be responsible for od)usting head location, type, size, and any other system components to comply With the requirements of the landscape planting as installed. Such adjustments shall be made when authorized in writing by owner. Such adjustments Will be compensated at the prices indicated in the proposal. Contractors shag personally examine the site and fully acquaint themselves with all or the existing conditions in order that no misunderstanding may ofterwards arise to the character or as to the extent of me work to be done and, likewise, in order to advised and acquaint themselves With all precautions to be taken in order to avoid fnjury to person a property. PLANTINGMATERIAL: The contractor shag make every possible effort to avoid existing plant material that has been tagged for preservation. Where such material falls in the path of trenching, the Contractor shag reroute the pipe a hand trench as necessary, to protect the designated plant material. Any damage caused by the contractor to newly introduced plant material or sod shall be restored to its ongino I condition prior to final acceptance. \.0 O 0-7 ZD op fU O c W U g J S O a -O N � " aL U'Z8 C To O O1 O �C O N io as N G eO DRrILaeeeRsaA y •�'c 'D Toqen u.Bmuu NOTES ° RenaV4w-p RooO 2 Pbaas o/ Rubber Hoe Wm.4 � Ag Plants sisal be Florida No.l a better. Controcta shag be familiarw/ Collier County Land Dev. Code�>�of Contractor shot verity of quantities indicated at time of bid.�ySnore mmn, 2 x2PTPine All contractors working on me project shag be licensed and fully Insured as required.( �The SMldch Contractor is responsible for replacement of al dead plant materials that occurs during the warrantee period.itconsaw Tress and palm Stalling shall be removed between 5 and 12 months by the Contractor.\.,WARRANTEE: •NI trees and palms shall be warranted for one year from final acceptance. •Shrubs shag be warranted for see months from final acceptance. nsnBnnN'Sod and annuals sisal be wonanfed fa fMee months from final acceptance.n�Iamabr of Hain Is ta Contractor is responsible to fertg¢e al new trees. palms. shrubs. and ground covers with low release fertl3zer/'1be 50%law then dWnater of Tool beg w/ndnors at installation.I _ BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY GINA GREEN P.E AND SOUARE'S LANDCAPING INC. - SDPA-200&AR-13409 L. L SITE IXUiMtION3 Pawpta W OTHmsAUU— To BE cam¢aTHIS NAN RIDARM THE NIOPERWY aAAmON lMAabwEA ITVCTmE a—.W.-FAH—.1as-IN-m IN rNRW111arr1KWRTRERNMWKOP M+CSw woec.Pe uc rTTCTT.we caav, INc.