HEX Final Decision 2021-27HEX NO. 2021-27
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
July 8, 2021
PETITION.
PETITION No. BDE-PL20190000674 - Request for an after -the -fact 4.4-foot boat dock
extension and boathouse over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the
Collier County Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or greater in width, to allow
a boathouse and boat docking facility with two boat slips each with a boat -lift, one for a 19-
foot vessel and the other for two personal watercraft, to protrude a total of 24.4 feet into a
900f feet wide waterway for the benefit of property described as Lot 151, Isles of Capri No.
2, also described as 166 Tahiti Circle, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The existing boathouse and dock were re -built, having been destroyed by Hurricane Irma, as
authorized under building permit No. PRBD20180104701. Upon completion of construction, it
was determined that the maximum allowable protrusion of 20 feet had been exceeded by 4.4 feet
as measured from the most restrictive point, the property line as per LDC Section 5.03.06.C.1. The
boathouse measures 13.8 feet by 20 feet and only covers the primary slip. The dock facility satisfies
the 15-foot side yard requirement for lots of 60 feet or greater in width. Approval of this boat is
required for the issuance of a Certificate of Completion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS.
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87(4) of the
Collier County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of
the County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
Page 1 of 7
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The County representative introduced the Petition and staff recommendations, followed by
Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative, and then public comment. There were no
objections to the Petition at the public hearing.
6. The County's Land Development Section 5.03.06.H. lists the criteria for dock facility
extensions. The Hearing Examiner may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a boat dock
extension request if it is determined that at least four (4) of the five (5) primary criteria, and at
least four (4) of the six (6) secondary criteria have been met.'
Primary Criteria:
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation
to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property.
Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are
the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be
appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-
family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing demonstrates that the property is located
within a residential single-family zoning district and comprises a single boat dock facility
with two boatlifts, each establishing a slip; one to accommodate a 19 foot vessel and the
other two personal watercraft. The proposed dock (dock and vessel combined) protrudes
24.4 feet from the property line which has been identified as the most restrictive point per
LDC Section 5.03.06. C.1.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch
or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish
that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)
described without an extension.)
Criterion not met. The record at the public hearing demonstrates that the plotted property
line is located on the landward side of the seawall and there is riprap along the seawall
further restricting where a boatlift could be installed, therefore a BDE would be required
for any proposed dock and boatlift. The Petitioner failed to specifically address the
criterion with respect to water depth. Although the applicant has provided a cross section
providing the MHW and MLW measures it does not demonstrate how the vessel/PWC are
impacted.
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 2 of 7
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
Criterion met. The record at the public hearing demonstrates that the as -built boat dock
does not protrude into a marked navigable channel and is consistent with other docks along
the subject shoreline.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the
required percentages.)
Criterion met. The record at the public hearing reflects that the as -built dock facility
protrudes 24.4 feet into a waterway that is 900± feet wide which is approximately 3.3% of
the width of said waterway.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Criterion met. The record at the public hearing reflects that the existing dock facility
provides 20.6 foot and 49 foot setbacks which is greater than the required 15 foot
side/riparian setback.
Secondary Criteria:
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed
dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these
may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,
or seagrass beds.)
Criterion met. The record at the public hearing reflects that the subject property line is a
convex curve. LDC Section 5.03.06. C.1, measurement of dock protrusion, requires
protrusion be measured from the most restrictive of several identified points; in this case,
maximum protrusion is measured from the property line which is landward of the seawall.
Additionally, the shoreline comprises a large rip -rap area that extends landward of the
property line as evidenced by Building Permit No. PRBD20150723986. Together, these
conditions require the dock facility protrude further into the waterway to reach adequate
water depths.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not
directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
Page 3 of 7
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the existing dock facility
consists of 406 square feet of decking. The proposed dock facility provides sufficient
decking for safe access to the vessel and two PWC's and further allows for other
recreational activities such as fishing, kayaking, and paddle boarding.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's
linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
Criterion not met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the shoreline is 102f
feet. The dockfacility has been designed to accommodate a 19 foot vessel and two PWC's,
therefore the 50 percent limitation has been exceeded.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of
a neighboring property owner.)
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the existing boathouse and
boat dock facility are well within the required 1 S foot side/riparian setbacks. Additionally,
a review of aerial photography indicate that the subject property is located on a convex
curve and that adjoining properties tend not to directly face said riparian lines.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds
are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.)
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the submerged resources
survey reveals no seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility,
there will be no impact to seagrass beds.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section
5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.
Criterion is not applicable. Based on the record at the public hearing the provisions of the
Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to individual docks behind individual
residences.
Boathouse Criteria:
1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen Feet.
Criterion met: The record from the public hearing reflects that the boathouse will not
exceed mandatory side yard/riparian setback requirements.
Page 4 of 7
2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet,
whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway
beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks.
Criterion met: The record from the public hearing reflects that the maximum protrusion
will be extended to 24.4 feet as measured from the property line and the waterway width
is 900± feet; therefore, the boathouse will protrude into 2.71 percent of the waterway.
3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever
is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof.
Criterion met: The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed height is 15
feet above the seawall/top of deck.
4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One.
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that only one boathouse is to be
built on this property.
5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides.
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the boathouse will be open
on all four sides.
6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the
principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling
unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction
of any boathouse or covered dock structure.
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the roofing material and
color of the proposed boathouse will match that of the existing single-family residence
serving as the principal structure at this location.
7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the
view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical.
Criterion met. The record from the public hearing reflects that the boathouse is located
within the required side/riparian setbacks and is already existing. Therefore, no new
impacts to the adjacent property owners will result from this project.
ANAL NSIS.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
Page 5 of 7
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06.11
of the Land Development Code to approve Petition.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number BDE-PL20190000674, filed by Jeff
Rogers of Turrell, Hall & Associates representing Robert Moses, Amy Moses and Amy Taylor,
with respect to the property described as 166 Tahiti Circle, further described as Lot 151, Isles of
Capri No 2, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, for the
following:
• An after -the -fact boathouse and 4.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet
allowed by Section 5.03.06.E.1 of the Land Development Code for waterways 100 feet or
greater in width, to allow a boathouse and boat docking facility with two boat slips each
with a boat -lift, one for a 19-foot vessel and the other for two personal watercraft, to
protrude a total of 24.4 feet into a 900± feet wide waterway for the benefit of the subject
property.
Said changes are fully described in the Dock Facility Plans and As -Built Survey attached as Exhibit
"A" and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Dock Facility Plans and As -Built Survey
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
166 Tahiti Circle, further described as Lot 151, Isles of Capri No 2, in Section 32, Township 51
South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
CONDITIONS.
1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
2. An ST permit must be sought and approved prior to obtaining a Certificate of Completion
for the boathouse and dock facility. Typically, ST permits are required at the time of
permitting; however, in this case, an ST permit was not originally required as the dock
facility was to be constructed within the same footprint as that previously approved by
Permit No. PRBD20150825947. Any such approval is to be based upon the Proposed
Aerial, sheet 03 of 10, and the As -Built Survey contained within Exhibit "A".
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
Page 6 of 7
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
August 5, 2021
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT "A"
N
■
s
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
TAMPA
1
FT. MYER
APL S MIAMI
o'
s
KEY WEST -0
CITY
COLLIER COUNTY
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
SITE ADDRESS:
<> 166 TAHITI CIRCLE
NAPLES, FL 34113
NOTES:
<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
<> LATITUDE: N 26.981449
<> LONGITUDE: W 81.733547
77"
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY AERIAL
DESIGNED JR 11, RMJ 10-29-19 .R PAGES 01-09
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1 6 6 TA H I-F I C I R C L E AT BY RMJ
D: 06-17-19 3
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO 19071 14,
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP SHEET NO. W OF 10 15
Emad: dma@wnell-moci3les-com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 _,.,.a.,r.,,,.., .:...... ..... ... ..,...., _ SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51S RANGE-26E
I
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF "COURT GREGORY"
SURVEY DATED 1--19
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF) 102
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF) SSS
WIDTH OF WATERWAY. MHW TO MHW (APPX) Soo
TIDAL DATUM
.. MHW (NAVD)• .OA2'
JOHNSON BAY
APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
� I
r�
EXISTING LIFT ,� \
♦ ';,a
SUBJECT PROPERTY
f0 20 4b
SCFILE9NxEfr
EXISTING \
SITE ADDRESS:
DOCK & 166 TAHITI CIRCLE
BOATHOUSE NAPLES, FL 34113
13.8'x20'
a
2' WIDE /p
SEAWALL CAP
y
APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
110,
PU
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732
Em3)I:d108(q)umF-a=ia(esoom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632
1 6 6 TA H I T I CIRCLE
EXISTING AERIAL
. , . .. ..........:._......,.._,_,...:,_....,.._..._......_-
2
RMJ 10.29 19
JR
ADD DIMS, REV NOTE BOX
ORAWN BY
RMJ
CREATED
9
3
JOB NO
9077
19031
4
.
SHEET NO
02OF10
15
SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51S RANGE-26E
a
O� APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
JOHNSON BAY
APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
r•
A4k PROPOSED LIFT
y
PROPOSED
BOATHOUSE
13.8'x20'
� SUBJECT PROPERTY
— PROPOSED
DOCK AND LIFT
2' WIDE
SEAWALL CAP
N
AM�k
S
fo 20 ,.
sCF(CE9N�EE?
SITE ADDRESS:
166 TAHITI CIRCLE
NAPLES, FL 34113
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES
ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF "COURT GREGORY"
•
• SURVEY DATED 104749
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF)
102
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)
S35
WIDTH OF WATERWAY MHW TO MHW (APPX)
S00'
TIDAL DATUM
.• MHW (NAVD:- +OA2'
•
• MLW(NAVD;=-1.5.1'
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)
512
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)
512
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE.
24.1'
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc.
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples,FL34104-3732
Email:=a(alomell4%odaWs.COm Phme: (239) 643-0166 Fax:(239) 643-6632
1 6 6 TA H I-F I C I R C L E
PROPOSED AERIAL
DESIGNED
JH
1
RMJ
10.29.19
JR
REV NOTE BOX
EDY
�;T.19
3_
CREATED
JOa NO
19031
1
SHEET NO m
WOF10
5
SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51S RANGE-26E
APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
X1-8.2 r dim . • v�
-13.4X
104 A •� .
13 3 �L,04`
k� ° 3 ' PROPOSED LIFT
-12.
b'e 12 9
106� _ �
-
aA -
-13 2X 1 2
_10 -6 2x f
-2-1.
JOHNSON BAY Ate.
APPROXIMATE
RIPARIAN LINE
I
N
S
fo 20 40
SCACE9N%EET
. PROPOSED
BOATHOUSE
bA 3.8'x20'
SUBJECT PROPERTY \
0
PROPOSED
DOCK AND LIFT
SITE ADDRESS:
166 TAHITI CIRCLE
�!F NAPLES, FL 34113
2' WIDE
SEAWALL CAP
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF 'COURT GREGORY"
•
• SURVEY DATED 10-07-19
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF)
102
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)
S35
WIDTH OF WATERWAY MHW TO MHW (APPX)
900'
TIDAL DATUM
.. MHW (NAVD)= •0.42'
•
• MLW (NAVD)- .1.67'
PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF1
612
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)
512
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM PROPERTY LINE
24.4'
........ +n I I I RMJ 10-29-19 1 JR I NEW PAGE
Turrel , Hall &Associates, Inc. '1 6 6 TA H I-F I C I R C L E DRAWN CREATED az2.19 3
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO 19031 14.
)M�t 3584ExchangeAve. Naples, FL34104-3732 PROPOSED AERIAL WITH DEPTHS SHEET NO 04OF10 15
EnWl:wm@h=U-miates.com iateS.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S FLANGE- 26 E
11
PROPOSED BOATHOUSE
NOT EXTEND OUT PAST
THE PROPOSED DOCK
NOTE:
ROOFING MATERIAL
AND ROOF COLOR
SHALL BE THE SAME AS
MATERIALS AND
COLORS USED ON
PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE.
3'
MHW = +0.42' NAVD 88
i
MLW = -1.63' NAVD 88 _
k
20'
ROOF EXTENDS 20' MAX
FROM MHWL
PROPOSED LIFT
24.4' TO PROPERTY LINE —
12 5' BOAT LIFT
L —
k
V
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DRAWN GNED RZ
Marine &Environmental Consulting '1 6 6 TA H I T I C I R C L E CREATED B&
JOB NO 9
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 CROSS SECTION AA SMEETNO us
3'
SCAfE 9NRiET
ALL PILES TO BE PVC
WRAPPED FROM 12"
ABOVE MHWL TO 6"
BELOW SUBSTRATE
PROPERTY
LINE
-PROPOSED
DOCK
EXISTING
SEAWALL
Email: tuoa@Imrell•assoclates.com Phone: (239) 643-0] 66 Fax: r.239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S RANGE- 26 E
20'
3'
3'
PROPOSED BOATHOUSE
a s 4 8
NOT EXTEND OUT PAST
THE PROPOSED DOCK
ROOF EXTENDS 20' MAX
SC711E9N�E£T
uFROM
3'
MHWL
'
NOTE:
ROOFING MATERIAL
PROPOSED LIFT
AND ROOF COLOR
SHALL BE THE SAME AS
24 a' TO PROPERTY LINE
o MATERIALS AND
PROPERTY
i COLORS USED ON
ia' BOAT LIFT
LINE
'- PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE.
0
n
PROPOSED
n
DOCK
n
(-
EXISTING
S
3 OEM! MM=:;=
SEAWALL
MHW=+0.42' NAVD 88 _
-1.63' NAVD 88 MLW =
ALL PILES TO BE PVC
WRAPPED FROM 12"
ABOVE MHWL TO 6"
BELOW SUBSTRATE
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNEBY D R 1
Marine &Environmental Consulting '1 6 6 TA H I T I C I R C L E DRAWN
E a3;5-19
JOB NO 19031
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 CROSS SECTION BB SHEET NO 060F10 1
Email: wm@mmll-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 51 5 RANGE- 26 E
81
A
■YS ~� WO
25
k
1
e% lk
1,x=
v .. . _*Ar
NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE / `"
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE. - - `
DESIGNED JR
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. '1 6 6 TA H I T I C I R C L E DRAWN BY: ;
-11�Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO. D6-17 a
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, Fl, 34104-3732 ADJACENT DOCKS SHEET NO 07OF10 B
aft
NOTE BOX
Email: tuna i#anell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 32 TOWNSHIP- 51 S RANGE- 26C
r
S
c 50 +oo zoc7
SCFICE9N-FET
ti• 1-7
,r
SUBJECT PROPERTY
L . <
�. �A
U 1 n• cJutrt
F_
�r
-77
IF
4
ST OVERLAY �qq�i rrJJ
40
DESIGNED: 'JR 1. V• RMJ 10-29-19 JR REV. NOTE BOX
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 1 66 TA H I T 1 CIRCLE CREA DRAWN
RMJ
3
JOB NO.: 19031 4,
OE17-19
Marine & Environmental Consulting
7!374ExC ge Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 ST OVERLAY MAP SHEET NO,: 090F10 5. :
Email: Wm@t=U-miata.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP- 5 I S RANGE- 266
/
/If If
If
NO SEAGRASSES WERE
OBSERVED GROWING y �` K
WITHIN 200 FT OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT i ;
in
N
A
r
20 40 81
SC7lCE9N�EET
SUBJECT PROPERTY
I*t
DESIGNED', JR I 1 I RMJ 10.29-19 JR REV. NOTE BOX
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. '1 6 6 TA H I T I C I FR C L E Dy 06-17.19 3
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO. 19031 14.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY SHEET NO 09OF10 5.
Emai1:tmla(4ft=H-&=iatmoom Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-32 TOWNSHIP— 51S RANGE-26E
rb
900,
NOTE:
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE TAKEN FROM THE AERIAL IMAGE.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
4
roo 200 400
SC1lCE sN�EE'i
DESIGNED JR I I I RMJ I W-29-19 I JR I NEW PAGE
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. '1 6 6 TA H I T I C I R C L E CDRAWNREATED R0.29-19
Marine & Environmental Consulting
JOB NO: 19071 4,
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL34104-3732 WIDTH OF WATERWAY SHEET NO, 100F10 15
1-
Emafl:Uu@UmH-amiates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION- 32 TOWNSHIP- 51 5 RANGE- 26E
SCALE 1" = 30'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
I DELTA
CHORD DIR
HO
C1
102-08
195.00129'b940'
S15.WW"W
100.92
C2
44.50
85.00
2VW40"
S1S'40$M
43.99
SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON NAVD'SS
.IUX _ _._FDDH
BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT.
76AX /
TIx+oo /
-14D X / \ i X6E
f.0 \+✓ LINES
-I 2X THE
MHW & M�OF
ABUT FS+n_
SEAWALL PANE.
/
\ \ .496-,
VVIOOO
�'6g
\ l DOCK
(ELIN."2N)
422
sa
>4.X V/ ��
421- `'°`„x /
PWROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN)
NOTE: RIPRAP WAS FOUND ALONG
g
LOT 151
ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SUBJECT
/ ?'
PARCEL CONTAINS 0.19 ACRES OF
PROPERTY OUT TO ABOUT 15 FEETw
/
LAND MORE OR LESS.
JOHNSON BAY
Zft WIDE
CONC SEAWALL
/
CAP
/ (08 TO FACE OF
NW18'34"W
VINYL SEAWALL PANEL)
110.2U' (M)
(CAP E.EV.132)
`
N89°19'00"W
SEAWAAL' LIN
110.00' (P)
(MODS)
LOT 150
LOT 152
y
F81C BAY
(NO 0) 0)
SENCHOM
FP*0IN
7 VALLEY GUTTER
ELEV. • 3.35
l
FM
(NO l)n
WOIDO) N89°19'00'W�
30.00' (P)
a _
W W
v�
Q�wa����
V O
�H3a
0
1"'
Q
m_j
_V
U
FPp#
p#o 8) n
NOTES:
1.THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED
ON THE CENTERLINE OF TAHITI ST (P)
AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 48
OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING NORTH 00' 41- W EAST
2.IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN
ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY
3.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND
RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD.
4.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY MAY 31. 2018
5 THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE
AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS
OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR
PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES
B.SUSSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE
NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY NO STATEMENT
IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND
OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS. UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT
MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY.
7.ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NA V D DATUM OF 1988
DESCRIPTION OF BENCHMARK IS AS FOLLOWS. FPKND IN GUTTER
BETWEEN RESVS 180188 TAHITI CIR ELEV = 3 W
&SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE' *AS
INDICATED ON FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP PANEL NO WA
DATED: BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED AT NIA
91,10 TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPu ED
BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS
EASEMENTS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR
UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
SURVEYOR.
10. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE PROPOSED
DOCK LOCATION WITH RESPECT TO THE PLATTED SUBJECT
PROPOSERTY PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT
Q • FOUND (-) IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR ID a) (FIR)
Q • SET 1I2' IRON ROD (PSM 08004XSIRC)
■ • SET 4' X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM 08004XSCM)
El • FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR ID O)(FCM)
*-BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SET) RAN • RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.)
Q • FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID 0) (FIR)
Q • SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM 08004) (SPKN&D) FD. • FOUND
FN&TT • FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM • BENCHMARK
P.C.P. • PERMANENT CONTROL POINT M
P.RM. • PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (n
CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK & STUCCO FF • FINISHED FLOOR
(PG) • PAGE CATV-CABLE TV CMP • CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
(M) • FIELD MEASUREMENT U.T.S.- UNITED TELEPHONE RISER
(P) OR (D) • PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT
(C) • CALCULATED MEASUREMENT CONIC • CONCRETE
(PB) • PLAT BOOK LME • LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
R.C.P. • REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE PROP • PROPERTY
C.L.• CENTERLINE T.O.B. • TOP OF BANK UE • UTILITY EASEMEN
DE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT CUE • COUNTY (U.EJ
LBE • LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT ELEC • ELECTRIC
PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SWE - SIDEWALK EASEMENT
MAP OF
ASBUILT SURVEY
(DOCK IMPROVEMENT ONLY)
LOT 151
OF
ISLES OF CAPRI NO. 2
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE($) 46
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
166 TAHITI CIRCLE
THIS SURVEY IS PREPARED FOR:
TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES
CERTIFICATION:
I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J.17,
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION
"ERTIFICATION OF TITLE ZONING, EASEMENTS OR
OM OF ENCUMBRANCES
,.u.w.o-cdn
SIGNED
COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004
DATE 10/0712019
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 05-31-2018
ADDED WATER DEPTH ELEVATIONS
DATE OF REVISION 10-03-2019
PSM # 6004
LB # 7112
CC.G.S.
Gregory Surveying, Inc.
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643-7845 office Date 10/07/2019
cgs6004@oomcast.net Job # EN40152M2
(239)272-3707 cell Fb M1-37 Pg 78