Backup Documents 07/13/2021 Item #16A22 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 1 6 A 2 2
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. 'I he completed routing slip and original documents arc to be furuarded to the( Attorney Office
at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later
than Monday preceding the Board meeting.
**NEW** ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the
exception of the Chairman's signature,draw a line through routingzlines#1 through#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office.
Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date
1.
2.
3. County Attorney Office County Attorney Office
7 AA/
4. BCC Office Board of County CZ:5 1�'1
Commissioners 'j
5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Courts Office
icd1 13320//`
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the
addressees above,may need to contact staff for additional or missing information.
Name of Primary Staff Mario Puente/Transportation Contact Information 239-252-5828
Contact/Department
Agenda Date Item was June 22,2021 Agenda Item Number 16A22
Approved by the BCC
Type of Document Change Order No.2 to Agreement No. 16-6700 Number of Original 1
Attached with Cardno,Inc.,in the amount of$67,973.32, Documents Attached
add 365 days to the Agreement to address pre-
existing conditions related to the Stan Gober
Memorial Bridge Repair and Rehabilitation
Project
PO number or account
number if document is
to be recorded
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A"in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not
appropriate. (Initial) Applicable)
1. Does the document require the chairman's original signature N/A
2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for additional signatures? If yes, N/A
provide the Contact Information(Name;Agency;Address;Phone)on an attached sheet.
3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be MP
signed by the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by
the Office of the County Attorney.
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's N/A
Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the MP
document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable.
6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's MP
signature and initials are required.
7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing slip N/A
should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is input into SIRE.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines!
8. The document was approved by the BCC on June 22,2021 and all changes made MP /A is not
during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County 't option for
Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable. r i is line.
9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by the BCC, /A is not
all changes directed by the BCC have been made,and the document is ready for the option for
Chairman's signature. e.
1 6 A 2 2
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 15, 2021
To: Mario Puente, Senior Project Manager
Transportation Road Maintenance
From: Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Change Order to Agreement #16-6700 w/Cardno, Inc.
Attached is a scanned copy of the document as referenced above, (Item #16A22)
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, July 13, 2021.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
16A22
Procurement Services
Caterer County Change Order Form
®Contract Modification ❑Work Order Modification 0 Amendment
Contract#: 16-6700 Change#: 2 Purchase Order#: 4500187495 Project#: 66066.15
Contractor/Firm Name: Cardno,Inc. Contract/Project: Stan Gober Memorial Bridge Repair/Rehab
Project Manager Name: Mario A.Puente,PE-CGC Division Name: GMD—Transportation Engineering
Original Contract/Work Order Amount $ 271,565.59 5/8/2018 16A Original BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item#
Current BCC Approved Amount $ 289,614.754 1/14/2020 :Last BCC Approval Date; Agenda Item#
Current Contract/Work Order Amount $ 289,614.75 5/27/2020 SAP Contract Expiration Date(Master)
Dollar Amount of this Change $ 67,973.32 31.68% ;Total Change from Original Amount
Revised Contract/Work Order Total $ 357,588.07 23.47% Change from Current BCC Approved Amount
Cumulative Changes $ 86,022.48 23.47% Change from Current Amount .
Completion Date,Description of the Task(s)Change,and Rationale for the Change
Notice to Proceed 06/25/2018 Original 06/20/2019 Last Approved 05/27/2020 evised Date TBD"
Date Completion Date Date ncludes this change)
#of Days Added 365 Select Tasks 0 Add new task(s) ❑ Delete task(s) 0 Change task(s) 0 Other(see
below)
Provide a response to the following:1.)detailed and specific explanation/rationale of the requested change(s)to the task(s)and/or
the additional days added(if requested);2.)why this change was not included in the original contract;and,3.) describe the Impact
if this change is not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contractor if needed.
*This project is currently on a stop work notice with 5 days remaining.
1. Per the original scope of work,Cardno Inc.performed a thorough Bridge Inspection Report(BIR)for Structure No.030184.
Findings in the Consultant's SIR indicated that the depth measured from the left bridge rail at Pier 13 during the 2017 Bridge
Inspection may have exceeded the scour critical depth by 1.3 feet.The concern was that the original revetment system,which
was installed to protect the pier against scour,may have been moved by Hurricane Irma. •
On Change Order No.1,the Consultant was asked to prepare an assessment detailing the findings of the inspection and the
condition of this scour countermeasure system for a not-to-exceed fee of$18,049.16 and 72 calendar days. Per the rationale of
Change Order No.1,Change Order No.2 would be processed once the results of the proposed assesment were known.
Per the attached Exhibit A-Scope of Services for Change Order No.2,the Consultant will design scour countermeasures,as
well as provide permitting services required for said scour measures,for a not-to-exceed amount of$67,973.32 and an
additional 365 days.
2. The scope described above was not included In the original contract as the potential conditions described above were not
known prior to the BIR performed by the Consultant.
3. Scour is one of the main causes of bridge failure,and not processing this change order could leave the aforementioned
potential issues untreated.
CI
Prepared by: E-----:
r'�r�t�c� r Date: / !
Mario A. ente,PE-CGC—GMD Transportation Engineering.
Acceptance of this C nge Order shall constitute a modification to contract/work order identified above and will be subject to all the same
terms and conditions s contained in the contract I work order indicated above,as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance. The
adjustment,If any,to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor/Vendor I Consultant!
Design Professional arising out oj.er I d to nge set forth herein,including claims for impact and delay costs.
is J a Dte: 4/26/2021
Accepted by:
Dougla Stok E—V Presiders Cardno inc.
Approved by: -,.- Date: Iv? '/?o•Zr
A , E 1 tree
0f
App n. by: Date:
Thaddeu ' I e —Department He
Approved by:SchneebergerSaraDigitally signed by SchneebergerSara
Date:2021.05.17 11:03:15-04'00' Date:
Procurement Professions
Revised: 10/28/2014 (Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.) PROCUREMENT USE ONLY
Adman Rpt BCC ES ,, •
1 6 A 2 2
ATTEST: BOARD OF eUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Crystal K. Kinxel,Clerk of Courts COLLI t R 'O 4 TY, FLORI
&Col, .Wier"'
0 I 11/C_ By: 01AI
{ , a Penny Taylor,Chairperson
Dated:%' ''
-*AO
,, A ft M haii"ran's
tInAture
App e to f rm legality:
Byk 4 it KA-ut..,,A
Scott R.Teach
Deputy County Attorney
1 6A2.2
(.7) Cardne
April 13t1, 2021 Shaping the Future
Mr. Mario Puente, PE-CGC
Senior Project Manager
Transportation Engineering Cardno
Collier County Growth Management Division 300 Park Place Blvd
2800 Horseshoe Dr. N. Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34104 Clearwater,FL 33759
USA
Re: Stan Gober Memorial Bridge Repair/Rehab. Project—Change Order No. 2 Phone: +1 727 531 3505
Fax +1 727 532 9091
Dear Mr. Puente: www.cardno.com
Cardno is pleased to submit this proposal that includes the design of scour
countermeasures and additional permitting services for the Stan Gober Memorial
Bridge.
The scope of work for Change Order No. 2 includes:
1. Drainage (Scour) Analysis (Lump Sum)
2. Drainage(Scour) Plans (Lump Sum)
3. Environmental Permits, Compliance and Clearances (Lump Sum)
The total proposed fee for the services provided in Change Order No. 2 is $67,973.32,
resulting in a total contract amount of$357,588.07
We are ready to proceed with this effort and will complete the project within 365 calendar
days of receiving NTP from the County.
Cardno looks forward to continue working with Collier County on this project. If I can
provide you with any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Doug q.olt<; PE
Transportation Practice Group Manager
Direct Line (727)431-1550
Australia • Belgium • Canada • Colombia • Ecuador • Germany • Indonesia •
Kenya • New Zealand • Nigeria • Papua New Guinea • Peru • Philippines • Singapore •
United Arab Emirates • United Kingdom • United Stales • Operations in over 100 countries
16A22
FEBRUARY 2021
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES FOR
STAN GOBER MEMORIAL BRIDGE REPAIR/REHABILITATION PROJECT
PROJECT NUMBER 66066.2
INCLUDING BRIDGE NUMBER:
030184
CONTRACT NO. 16-6700
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
16A22
I PURPOSE 3
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3
6A DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 4
6I3 DRAINAGE PLANS 4
8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS,COMPLIANCE AND CLEARANCES 5
Only sections relevant to the Change Order are included. They are
numbered according to the original agreement.
A-2
16A22
SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
BRIDGE/STRUCTURAL AND HIGWAY DESIGN
Collier County Project Number: 66066.2
Description: Design and Related Services for Repair/Rehabilitation of the Stan
Gober Memorial Bridge in Collier County, Florida.
[CR-92 /San Marco Road over Marco Channel]
Change Order No. 2
Bridge Number: 030184
1 PURPOSE
The principle intent of this Change Order is to provide design a permitting for Stan
Gober Memorial Bridge (No. 030184) Scour Countermeasures.
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
After data from the FDOT Bridge Inspection Report (BIR) was reviewed in concert
with the Phase IV Scour Analysis and 2008 Scour Countermeasure Plans, it was
determined that the depth measured from the left bridge rail at Pier 13 during the
2017 Bridge Inspection exceeded the scour critical depth by 1.3 feet. Due to concerns
with the scour countermeasure system including potential shifting due to Hurricane
Irma, the CONSULTANT provided further investigation and evaluation of the Scour
Countermeasures at Piers 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16.
Based on recommendations from the investigation and evaluation, this scope
includes the design of scour countermeasures as well as the additional permitting
services required for the scour countermeasures into the CONSULTANT'S "Stan
Gober Memorial Bridge Repair Assessment Report".
A-3
1 6A22
6a DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
6a.17 Technical Special Provisions
The CONSULTANT will develop technical special provisions for the scour
countermeasure repairs.
6a.18 Other Drainage Analysis
Data Collection
The CONSULTANT will collect information and data necessary to perform the study
including bathymetric data, topographic maps, bridge inspection reports, scour
evaluation reports, and bridge plans. Also during this task, The CONSULTANT will
compile the design hydraulic conditions at the site from the existing modeling. This
task will not include a site visit.
Recommendations Regarding Existing Protection
The CONSULTANT will develop recommendations regarding rehabilitation,
augmentation, or removal of the existing protection.
Scour Countermeasure Design
The CONSULTANT will develop the conceptual design for the scour protection. This
includes defining the horizontal and vertical extents, specifying the type of material
(e.g. sizing rubble riprap), and incorporating any design constraints. The
CONSULTANT will document all methods, procedures, and results in a letter report.
6a.20 Technical Meetings
6a.22 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
6a.24 Supervision
6a.25 Coordination
6b DRAINAGE PLANS
6b.6 Miscellaneous Drainage Detail Sheets
The CONSULTANT will develop a design for the scour protection. This includes
defining the horizontal and vertical extents, specifying the type of material (e.g. sizing
rubble riprap), and incorporating any design constraints.
A-4
1 6A22
The CONSULTANT will develop construction plans that reflect the design.
6b.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
6b.14 Supervision
8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS, COMPLIANCE AND CLEARANCES
The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY Project Manager, and other appropriate
personnel in advance of all scheduled meetings with the regulatory agencies to allow
a COUNTY representative to attend. The CONSULTANT shall copy in the Project
Manager on all permit related correspondence and meetings.
8.2 Field Work
The CONSULTANT shall perform the following Environmental Field Work.
8.2.2 Establish Wetland Jurisdictional Lines and Assessments
Wetland jurisdictional lines will not be established because all maintenance work to
be performed is over water. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) survey and
Essential Fish Habitat(EFH) assessment will be performed in the vicinity of the scour
protection system only, for scour protection system repair. SAV/EFH
assessment/substrate assessment for contractor barge access clearance is not
included.
8.2.3 Species Survey
The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary species surveys.
8.3 Agency Verification of Wetland Data
The CONSULTANT shall perform field visit with both agencies, at the same time, and
shall submit required follow-up information.
8.4 Complete and Submit All Required Permit Applications
The CONSULTANT shall perform the following work as part of the Environmental
Permit Application process.
8.4.1 Complete and Submit All Required Wetland Permit Applications
The CONSULTANT shall complete and submit all required wetland permit
applications. This scope of work assumes a SFMWD Exemption Verification or
General Permit for bridge maintenance, and a USAGE Nationwide Permit. The scope
includes completing and submitting permit applications, including the Uniform
Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM), assessing impacts, compiling
A-5
16A22 --
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Environmental Support document, and
assisting with responses to Requests for Additional Information.
This scope assumes no permanent wetland impacts and no mitigation will be
required.
This scope assumes no bridge permitting is required, but that coordination with Aids
to Navigation will be required and a memorandum will document the coordination and
recommendations to the engineer.
8.5 Prepare Dredge and Fill Sketches (as needed)
Assume no bridge permitting required, but that coordination with Aids to Navigation
will be required and a teleconference
8.6 Prepare USCG Permit Sketches
Assume no bridge permitting required, but that coordination with Aids to Navigation
will be required and a teleconference memorandum will document the coordination
and recommendations to the engineer.
8.17 Technical Meetings
The CONSULTANT shall attend virtual meetings with the WMD/FDEP, USCG,
USFWS, and Collier County.
8.18 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
8.19 Supervision
8.20 Coordination
A-6
16A22
n : ii� e :^ . ? SPee0. 6.' e0.0,2 •6rs> e r � en x S 36
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ? 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2- 2 2 2 2 2 ?' > R F 6 : !,
G ,° 4 T c! M A it H " !t ! Y i it h $
R
t7 N N N N a'1 �.. N r
).; y p
F.
�, 9 m .tl W v, 1n g Q "
• N
24
3 ylylyl " v. 8882225i5tNNS2H Na2i51g3i `gg2R21g8 .0 .
' n n n
1.1
A Y h
t
.__________.. _. ..0 0 o n n n 0 n o u u u u u u n O tJ u n i;
1 i
2 ah§n' = >` .t oon 51 $ o ,° n a o 0 0 0 .`,1 0 <' n
� v, m O
PPQk'
Lg `»t•!
C � U,O ) u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 2 i.
t AAq �l - d.
C 7 N; n -, qy
,§` Y- x g
8$ 2i O O O O n O 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 000 o o 0 0 0 0 . 0 . . .1: g
n
W
a
, . 00 . 000 . . . "1 U ❑ W
4 000000 . . . . . . 00 . 00 .. . . . . . . . C 2 W a
yy,
d'
C, Z ~e W q
x ❑ Q 3 $ Z 1 W
W f _ u, t-
L '� W c] ,Ij ", y E y
r3 8 'Li W S ul
❑ 0 O n O n n u u t, 0 0 >-r' ,,.N ` 0
�ps u o 0 o n n < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 o n n � �7q 2 a 1 u p @@X
z y!l) Y w 00 i u g . . O
N a.� 0000 0 0 o 0 . 0000 . 00 . . . . 0 . 00 n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 8
Z ��
o Y
8
CZ
< n n o u Ls0 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0000 . . 01
f.! 2
t-
N 0-
p > O o to o O O n c, n O n n o CI n O C> O o o C. O n O E., o O O o n n I v,4g gte
o
u.
W• LCC v j V
.a O g 8
Q m _ 0 •�.] o o n o n n o O n o O o 0 o O O n n o O u 0 O n n a-, �t N £
`� ro n Yel
. n 0 0
_ p
o
to 4$, n n n V g 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u o 0 0 o n n n o 0 0 0 0 . nn21
r
5 a ;^ n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u o 0 0 0 n n n n u o 0 0 0 0,0'a (1 O
15. n n
b
n b
1 0 0 u n m 0 (,t n o a a o 000 . 000000 0 . 0v . 0 0 . 000 w
d8
11 3
_ ry 1�y E u - u3 i ^ n n n n n u onno n000uunnnuuauoj
ITl1� tlGu , ; n � I I y.a
y yy 1 o
a Ai , • F 2 n
LL
p Ng .' k d y p E 1▪ 1 q a _ b s
8 fgkUm k *. p 8
i) gU ki 9 g o n
iw e N
c as C o
Li h i,n a " gi ` Rr d nr ub -- s CW § - :
@ ° x s rc a V ❑ e N :E
7. z V k y
j Yz q
li • L 11 it _ g S :a :, S 2 L si L L: g
Q u 4 4 Yi .2 ,n° .t _ V 9 T. ry ry �v r " v m H o Qv' n n n g !1i n ,
1
INTERA PROPOSAL
Local Scour Countermeasure Design for the Stan Cober(Goodland) Bridge(CR-92 over Marco
Channel)(Bridge No.O30184)
Collier County
INTERA Incorporated
January 2019
Problem Understanding
Collier County has requested the design of local scour countermeasures for the existing Stan (_iober
(Goodland) Bridge over Marco Channel (Bridge No. 0301 84). Cardno, Inc. requested preparation of this
Scope of Services from INTERA Incorporated. The purpose of this Scope of Services is to provide
recommendations regarding the existing scour protection and to develop to design scour countermeasures
for several of the interior bents.
Assumptions
We based our scope of services on the following assumptions:
1. Cardno will provide 1NTERA with survey data (bathymetric and topographic) from the bridge
location.
2. Cardno will provide INTERA with plans of the existing bridge.
3. Design will rely upon existing hydraulic modeling of the area contained in the Phase 2 Scour
Evaluation Report for the bridge.
Scope of Services
Task I Data Collection
INTERA will collect information and data necessary to perform the study including bathymetric data,
topographic maps, bridge inspection reports, scour evaluation reports, and bridge plans. Also during this
task, INTERA will compile the design hydraulic conditions at the site from the existing modeling. This
task will not include a site visit.
Task 2 Recommendations Regarding Existing Protection
As part of the rehabilitation project,Cardno indicated that an underwater inspection will occur to evaluate
the condition of the existing scour protection. Based on the results of this inspection, INTERA will
develop recommendations regarding rehabilitation,augmentation,or removal of the existing protection.
Task 3 Scour Countermeasure Design
INTERA will develop the conceptual design for the scour protection. This includes defining the
horizontal and vertical extents, specifying the type of material (e.g. sizing rubble riprap), and
incorporating any design constraints. INTERA will document all methods, procedures, and results in a
letter report. Additionally, as pall of this task, INTERA will review the construction plans and
specifications developed by Cardno to ensure that the final drawings reflect the conceptual design as well
as to address any variances as they arise.
Task 4 Quality Control Review
INTERA will conduct a complete internal review before submission to the Cardno for its review and
comment.
I6422-
"Task 5 Project Coordination/Meetings
1NTERA will participate in teleconferences, as necessary, with the Cardin) during the length of
INTERA's involvement with the project.
Budget
The cost to perform these services is$14,257.32,This cost reflects 91 hours of fully burdened labor.
� � � � �
� �� �� �� ��
» 1;
_ �� - uonxoo : von0000nvoonwoo : o : owonv000x �mwmx�u ° `° �
^ * xp � : : * : o ^ ; : : : xnw � V
~ u
° ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ' - - - �
. . . . . ~ . . . ~
���� ~ . ~
~ . . . ~ . ~ . . ~ . . . �=
o C�. __---_-_-__ ---
a " � � � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ ^ ^ ~ ` ^ ` ~ ` ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~~�
, , " , , . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~x ~ a
! ' e
-- '--' -- -----� -----'--- ----- | �
o u
� �. . . ^ ~ . ~ . . . . . ~ . . ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ . ~ . . ..�
0
" D � u
. . . , ~ ~ . . .^ u � &~�� U� � "
^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ` ` ' ` ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ x
�
~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~a
5� ^
0
[L x
� .
CL , , ~ , , , , ~ , ~ , , , ~ ,,w
w
UJ 8 �
~ ~ ^ ~
� « ---- ----- -- - ---- ' ---- - ----1—
^ � * ~ , . , , , , , , , , , . , , . . . . . . . . . ` ~ ~m �
�� � . . . . . ~ �
D ----- ------' --' ; c
. . . . ~ ~ � . . . . . ~ . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ . .�� �
iz
' ^ ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .1 �
It, �
: � Ills
x � » � � 8 � � � 8 � � �
� ' � � !
nx
-----