Resolution 1993-288/DO 1993-01
.
.
'-"
'-
M
',1
6%ECu~~y~ &DMftARy
PETITION NO. DOA-93-1, NEALE MONTGOMERY OF PAVESE, GARNER, HAVERFIELD,
DALTON, HARRISON AND JENSEN REPRESENTING NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA, N.A.,
TRUSTEE FOR THE PARKLANDS TRUST BENEFICIARIES FOR A PETITION TO AMEND
THE PARKLANDS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) DEVELOPMENT ORDER
85-4 FOR THE PURPOSES OF DELETING SOME 323 ACRES MORE OR LESS FROM SAID
DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND AMENDING THE MASTER PJ~ TO REFLECT THE DELETEO
AAEA, :<;;:l'ENDINC TH:: ~'aMMENCEM!::)Il,!, AND BU1LD OUT D2'.~B B'! fL'.]);; i!E!\R5 1';;;:;
MAKING CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO SECTION 9. TRANSPORTATION SECTION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 8 AND 9, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (COMPANION TO PUD-84-24-(1)
OBJECTIVE:
This petition purports to amend the Par~landB (DRI) Development Order
roJ. the purpose of ...li..... '-r.c: some 323 acree from .~:'<, current rc',;ulatory
document and to extend the development time frame by 5 years and such
minor changes brought about by the reduction in area. A companion
amendment to the parklands PUD will be necessary to complete the
process of taking the subject land out of the regulatory framework that
this land is now subject to.
CONSIDE!Ul.TIONS:
The Park lands Development of Regional Impact Application For
Development approval was approved initially by the Collier County Board
of Commissioners on September 10, 1985. The portion of the Parklands
DRI lying in Collier County contained 965.4 acres. The approved
Development Order 85-4 was for a project of 2,410 residential (single
and mUlti-family) units on approximately 498.7 acres at a density of
2.5 units per acre; recreation open space (approximately 466.7 acres)
to include a golf course and club (approximately 165.8 acres), a 7.23
acre county park site, a fifteen (15) acre school site, grounds
maintenance facilities, central water and sewage facilities, and the
required rights-of-way and/or roads.
The proposed reduction to the land area coveI'~d by thi" Develc~~";!" i,'.
Order is coupled with a proposal to reduce the total number of dwelling
units, originally authorized at 2410 dwelling units to 1603 dwelling
units.
~he aubj~Gt. property i~ aesi~nated Urban Residential on the Future Land
Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Urban Designation permits
residential development at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre
with the potential to increase or decrease provisions of the Den"ity
Rating System.
The current and revised density wiU'remdn at 2.5 dwelling units per ..
acre, ,therefore based on the type ot. u...;,aUthorized and the density of :' ;:)j
housing, the proposed ameridment, is cOn.istent ,with:,;th~7;.\})ltuh'rLand Use ,..:", " :\j
Element of the Growth Managemerit '1?lan"\;I'I:"j'~~' ';':..11;"'" . .' "\""~tif ,'~''':!;(Y~{t~~'' ., , '" W;'i:i"I"
'\ 'I ~ ",' . "., t; ',. ,.it:')'."ldt ~ 1'\ ,~~., ~
.' ,. . . . , !!.;fi 10, ~ ~'l'~~::>"!.f'~'A .~' ,', 't1'o("'\ .1' .'4l';~.~~~t ~ ''i';"I~~,1l'-i;1
\t\-\ - " ,r'r~~' . ~,;.'?(~:/:':~:. ~. "_~'1~"i.;, , ~ .aGE "~~'
, , >_'.1 ..' >!~'"-v.~it"f';;'!" 'f . ",'"f:l-"~.f" ~,. J', ~.i'
,..1.\. ,. . '."" '" ""'.' ,I,,. ~1:;;:.J..: Ho.V' :v \. Y,
\~Jl~t''5\1';_\ - - . - ."')r,. . .~, ',_ ',....7f'tl.; "T- _. .
. ~~,-~lt!'.~ _ . '_": ",,, -"m 'I ' .~~ "~I.JN" U .' a...,..,.,.
1..;.",:'!3(~~~,~.{,', " ,,;.\;;t~~.(" '. ~';i"<" .~. .,~.3.:~..','ii\.d'.i.'.
'.' ,''',Ii- ~'/..:'~'1 .~,., '\;.Il;~~;~r'llo:' ";',' ;:J';..f{"
~)1:. ~& ~~I~4.;.:.'~:' ,'~it'~;\::l~~:: " ,ol::~~ ",
'~.:......-..- ""'"
(,!)
0-
o
o
o
'rot..
, .,," ~'~'
.
.
r-
.-
'M
',0
(.D
r:
.'- ,
"-
: 0
,',:0
':i'.'~'
The Board of Commissioners continued this petition at the June 8, 1993
t-ub! i,. h",~r; 1'1; :,.,caUU\;l "f r~l":esellt.1tionG from both the Regional
Planning staff and Collier County School District (Dr. Robert
Ferrante) . Durinq this interval staff met with the staff of the
reqional council and with Lee County's zoninq and transportation staff
to explore the issue of arterial roadways between Immokalee Road (C.R.
846) and Bonita Beach Road. This discussion concluded with a
reaffirmation that an arterial road between the two stated County
thoroughfares was an essential future transportation requirement.
Bec;::\:s", of uncertfli;-- environm..nt:\l cond:\.t~_c.ns in "_hip glii1:l;.:al area ....d
tne unlikelihooa of qaininq permittinq approval it was decided that the
development order ought to be further amended to provide for a qreater
latitude in the ultimate location of the north/south arterial road as a
precondition to any development of the Park1ands. The amended
development order was therefore supplemented with 1anquaqe that charges
the owner of the Park lands to provide right-of-way and construct a two
lane facility either a10nq the a1iqnment created by the east limit of
the Parklands or some other a1iqnment that can be approved.
Regard~nq the ma~ter of a aedication of land for school purposes, the
current development order provides for the dedication of a 15 acre
site. The PUD is more specific as to location and timinq.
Representatives of the School Board have indicated a desire to amend
whatever development order is necessary to achieve some additional
specificity with respect to the dedication. They asked that the value
at the time of dedication be based or. ..t", \'::.lue of the land at the time
of approval. Our best information is that this cannot be done.
Moreover, since the date of approval of a school impact fee ordinance
which now definitively addresses the issue of dedication and its
relationship to impact fees, the value of any dedication of land has to
be offset by an equal value of impact fees. The owner has responded
with an agreement to revise the wording in development orders to
provide greater flexibility in determining where in the Farklands the
site will be located and also provides that the dedication be subject
to credit towards impact fees in the event a site is donated. The
owner also agrees to pay school impact fees in the event a school site
is deemed unnecessary. This supplemental lanquage has been included in
the PUO document.
The amendment to the Park1ands Development Ord,,;l" does not chan-:;e t",t:
nature of the original approval, and does not give rise to any new
condition that deserves immediate attention by way of new development
stipulations.
M~di~i,~tion to the provisions dea1inq with commencement of
construction and date of termination of the Development Order are
specifically provided for by law and bear no relationship to the test
of determining the substantial nature of the amendment.
"c' The principal thrust of transportation concern. at the time of original
f#,j.t, approval, . specifically that a road be,'constr.ucted from,the"Park1ands to ,;,~
~~~. :, ,'IlDIIlokalee, Road is retained andunalt~r..dJinSp1e,alD.nd.~~~oCiull!~nt. All'::'19tn
~.:,;',; l-developmentcolDlllitment. with r..pecttb;;'~!I!,~rigina1,i~:l.!,e,-:~lopJllent order' ; >~
. ,.\. -remain in,:p.~ace. ", "'~: ,:>/;~;J~\?~~'.:m'::.::',~I:',' J1"', ,.';':,:">J,_._9;p.;,1~'I~'1'*"'.!w>~',.(<,,./<. . I. ,: .~,'.(3
' ;' ~l;::::..:.*~~jif:"~.'.;~\~;;-,,';;:;;;_~.::~~:~~..';:,;i;'t~':'::'~:i,;'~:~:>:::" ''',>'':',).';';' H~(:~~t~ :J~fc.~)~4 \ ',.", ' . <"~'"
.I!".'_~\:"F;',,', ""'$-"~'.~~l't''1,,-,,''t:~J..'/ ,", ;f.. "\'4,"'~ ",' ..t;' -1- -'/ ".)'_h,
.,,,. , ,'.,': ," ';:,~~:;.\:,:': ,'~~;:,~)':J...:.,,:.,I",:~", "~,~,7'::;~~;. 'e": ,.~.;;~~~::i':" _:\~':"~::ii^' ",~~~ "~:r,:;,:~,,,,;: <~"" .. :.. ,il~
. ,. ',".' :":\.:;~':'C,..2:--' ,~":i:t:""':':"'"'.:ii'~ UiG,~it993;""_"~"'\-'
, ,~'\, J.:. ' 'f' , ;r.,", '.0'( ,",.q..~ ~-~..,,~\~ ': Q>:'";t.. .t?:,:',. ,,1':1> ~Jjl-:' 1'\0"', _ f", -,' >: ~" .. '" ,j.~" .".,<< :.,~ i .: '," ..,
~;''t{~'il/ ,1 ,~. "" , ~~~-,~~:'i.,i",;:' " " ~'.: .', '<, ''''~l '~'I' .: 1'~ai:':!~"'I',:';"\1.J;1 - ;."
,_~ \\.'1t~~,~ ,~; ;~ .' ~,~ ~I;'~.<.,:,:::~:;:~.~~ ~-' " ~ ,: '. \. ,;1' ~~:::;":~}. :!',
'._"'(\"~:.~.t-:':"S':'''''\-~/:;-''\'\'':''';::-'1L(l ~\ ' .' ''',. ~.:t'
.~~$,~~,:," ',:\ -,"'~,,i,~:,_.;..,~,~~,:,-,,.,.!.:,\~'.u ..':. ,r::"~'I' ~~':""_ '-.l~;;'1"",. "., "', '~
R~IEWED BY:
./' /"','. I
/.'/..,..,' /, , .'Jo;>'<. ,....t:
'KENNETH W. BAGINSKI
CURRENT PLANNING ~AGER
.' /} -1--~ / j
L. " I " " r, lSIA_,-,'1.A.'{'.
ROBERT E. BLANCHARD, AICP
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIRECTOR
I /' "
,," j'/~,../ Lt:.' t:~ /1,A(~
'-'!,FRANK',W., BROTT, AICP
':e~CO~I'1'YDEVELOPMENT ,SERVICES
. . ,.r;..:::' .::,~~;'r;:~~1:>:'~<"'< ',,' _ '>;,~' ", . - i~l-j'
\?:~:tx>A.;;g3;"1' EX SUMMARYlmd: Jf,.,
i~~t.:.~t,.{ '~!i~,:,y~,,~~<"'-~";,'" - \, ~,'> :'" ~"!-"d;;".::',.\~.:.." " :-' ;;'\'.
""""~~.'i;j,;":;,~;!f:~:';';:~#i:-,, ' " ' ,'~3,t..~~,::::.<" ,...,'~:.: ",
~;' :tlri~;..;\l;;Z;;::,t"" .. ~'''~>.;i' "",:;.'-.,~,~r'~
~ ~1~1' . :'1fj~~~~:.;;/:.~'~';:').~,:':';:': ...:,\;I~'~~~'j::;' ,;:~:; '&~~~.~:t~~,':~,::\~~i,:.:
i',l~:", .l~~l~Iol";~~?~' ':\, :"",': ~ ,,;'''\/:,{''~1!'\*''~~~~'-:: '\<f'~.:o; ,~:,'hl<,~i, ',~~
~~'~',~#l..,:.....~t:'.(j.:<"'.~::t:..,: :' ,~I\t;:,~~AAtI\~l"r:l~'L, ,,: J.;~~~:ia'i3~
.
co
,-
e
""'~j"''".,.n._ '
..J:: ~,,-,.., '>i. \
"~tr ..'~I::.:_-'~.'!rii'i\;-""\'-'~'1(i;V.,~:;"",
". .,' ,'";' .,....'.
<''.:-4'rr:,~:~''h,~
"'~. ('02lier count}' PJann!nq Cornmia~ion heard this petition at' their.
meeting ot May 20, 1993 and unanimously recommended approval ot the
revisions. No person spoke or communicated any objection to this
amendment to the CCPC.
FISCAL IMPACT:
?Jon..
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT'
The amendment to the Parklands Development Order will not have any
impact on the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The amendments
proposed remain consistent with the GMP.
The subj~ct prcrA~ty ~s located ~ithin
d.Jsignator.! C'.~ 'th~ .f~:'~ra Land Use Hap_
set forth in the Future Land Use Element
the Urban/Residential arlla !l~
~n:"," raque:Jt ib permitted as
of the Growth Management Plan.
Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject
to a concurrency review under the provisions of the Adequate PUblic
Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24 at the earliest or next to occur ot
either final SOP approval, fip!l~ ~lat approval, or building permit
issuance applicable to this development.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION'
The Collier County Planning commission recommends approval of Petition
DOA-93-1 a petition to amend the Park lands Development Order 85-4 as
described by the Resolution of adoption "Exhibit A".
PREPARED ,131:
, , ,
l- ,', \ ' ',\ - r-; '\' .
. . _" .. v .
RONALD F. NINO, AICP
SENIOR PROJECT PLANNER
~ ',. ;;.-.,
\. 'I\. \-:..l.., J
DATE
./.....; 7 ~
DATE
'/ /,./ C, -?
DATE,' .-
..,",
.u . ~,
".,"l;.','}:''''~~'"'~:':~:','~' ,"".: ~";l< l,lI'1',1'~'~:!i~t~~""'4WP""
.. ,... AGENDAITEM~'S:!::'I':;'/:'
3HT."!
I..,.
I
rpl(i~;NA l
....
a a fI1 A.,:~
;i&fo"'vA..n
J{ ~ ~ 11 /I -~....,
~ COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
q 11 U 'I, r-. l '" · .", Ij; I 1\ \:1 ':31,4 3 '"'
r'llft D~ELOPMElh. SERVICES OIVISION' - r:.J
Jl.EI
APRIL 21, 1993 I
PETITION 1'1)' 001\' :l~"1., NEALE" MONTGOMF,RY OF PAVESE, GARNER ,I
HAVERFIELD, DAL'l'Ol., a..."U\1sm:, l.1;;:;J JENS::;;:
REPRESENTING NATIONS,BANK OF FLORIDA, .'. AS.
TRUSTEE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE'- PARKLANDS
DEVELOPMENT OFi'REGIONAL IMP}(CT DEVELOPMEN~
ORDER )85-4 AS AMENDED, ..LOCATED TWO MILES ,NORTH
OF IMMOKALEE RbAD (CR-846) IN SECTIONS.S AND
9, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. ' '
DATE:
'"
~G~h7/A~PLICANTI
owner':
Ms. Neale Montgomery
Pavese, Garner, Haverfield, Dalton Harrison, &
Jensen i
1833 ,Hendry street i
P.o.; Drawer 1507 '
.Ft. ;J.lyers"Florida! 33902 "
" " ,,'~. - ,.."
\ i 'f J.
:Nationsbank of Flo;ida, N.A., As Trustee
P.O. Box 1857, i '
Naples, Florlda3393g-1857
(See Application Appendix For Members Of Trust)
I .
Agent:
.
,-
J
B~~~-~~TED :ACTIONf , :l.
The amendment to the p,arklands Development Order ,is made necessary as a
result of a decisiOn.' to sell a portion of the land covered by this
develppmept order~..to;an individual (II)' unrelated to the ownership of the r:J
MParklands~~Th.~:.ffeqt of such a ,decision ic th~t it ~od1fies the~otal ,
C> '.' aJ1'~un.1;ofi::~!l1'lcl:::."~.maitl!~q, and. thus lYe the proportionate ~~stribution of ,:..;
(.!) J ll!-nd i/.use,B!-:-:tJ:1!JU' nu~er:; of I hO\l!!linqIP!J~itB and requir II' appropria~. c>
. ~modif;icatioK_lto . that-Masteri Plan., f;Additional modifi ,jtioni:' in. c.,lUdeB c)
C .. e',rt2r;::U-.:j -the..;'of'l e-,.fyi-;-C:O'Jllll\8ncemant_O'Ldevelopment and t t1tIination date .:,'
o ,~, by! ~i va ;yea1:'S.:a.!!~--::o.ne }l.ay 'faB prpv~ded" by State Administrative. Rul~. b
'Theoben ~~~~.vel0pm$.nj;,_C?rde _,~oul~. also cause removal of a requiremert '
",to buil~ --':i~:no~~~r ~F",:P;,qad't. '1'h!s1 has already baen a-ccomp1i~ad', as 0
rapresen ad '-J:lY';~lle . natruct10n of Bon! ta Grande "Roa1S;.:1n~tlQe~CQU-ritv ahd
1b"':<:'lln .?:~ n.~~O:;- ~:+ast"west lroad': in the Quai:lw,;les'GJ.'i..,yelopl1\ent.
(B~r am Roa~h ' ' .. ...."'...~ ,: ;)' . " '. , '.1(,-. ~o .; I '
. ., ,,'''t'. If l !:t "0':114' -~- '_o/.{' , . \. -. . '': I( ~ ~.' .,'
. ~',: . _... 'v'v ~ lW"Jt ~JJ""'_ ~,.. . t, "\r'\.,./ '. /, ,', ,~~?,.' "";''''';'~l';
~~,.:/:i.'" )t~~...., \\' , 'l"h1 .,tlI'Jl..~~q~";I!"'i~;,A,' ," , \ . > ~ift.: :':.~..~~t,'ll
< ,. I ',11. "'~ t,. a'f"'jtM j 'I'l""'~ C;;.fi':.I' '~\ l' ,..- l-';{'~~
'~'~;,t~!f':s;.,.... ...t'~ r ", 't1i' 1- !', \ '.1 ........~.."I.. ~,.." :.'....-<.. . :.o".;..,~t
~,~ _ . . I iV''- ",;!~dlh,\,~<:~t.t~;'~'1ie.~ . '(~'...'
A.~~- .~""\l\1 ..' ~f.' , .,'~~.,'";!," ~,(~\J~ '"";<e,_:",,,<"~'>~n;.\,.,j,-<;J!: ;'~~i
.~~.....'i, " ~ , ~...... ~!; ~::k,~
" '.~! . ~. ~ '10. 1" ....-.f+ :.!,':~
~'~ .~ --.~ -~"~i""
:~j\'.~,"1~~'~'" f~~:.t.;;:,j'~
;:,~:,,_,;,:,,'J"'\'V~II\"f.)',
"','" ,:_." ',\i~~.:..,~I,'
M~d ' ~ .tiJ~i~1
H_)~,' ,~;tgj.
.",," /~.
, ~,~;~
C'\
"'~'~"""""""'" '., ,:' ,
", ' -4:<"'" "~,!_'i . ,:""'f!\.
.... 'I ". .
.1"'C ".
t, '1!!3().4 .
THE P'AAR:KLANDS
..'",'.,
..-;' :'~H~:\>~ '{',.'t:',::.'"
.. . .', :, . l\ (\,
1\....' 1,,""Ji' .;..,
GENERAL LOCATION MAP
:~T~rz
/'1 "
.. -; "; "I,. , ., I" i
~.' "."" ""-I'T
ft'.... ';;t, r :':.' :.:itriJf' . ~
. :"."" '. , '.'.. I
'\~ 7- : :.:; ,o. :~,".' '_ . __. _
'-:;".~'I'~,: ::r.' "r l
I., ::.~:'" -.. - , -,-
'. ;. ,.....l
!
I.
-," '\
. ..1,..... ',.',
, ,
'nl.'.
,t\,', ,
. : ~.I< j ;.( .;~ ;~, ~,: '.':",-'
. ~ f) 11 ;:';:1,
I
I
__._ __j 0-
j
; ---'I
I
i
i,.J..'".
I
I
i I
"r":
'r"-'-
. 1
. ,....,L....
I"'fl
".:: :'~'.1 (.~\.;.: "
,
.10,.,
Cl
N
M
Cl
(,!)
0-
o
Cl
p
.___. I..
I
-..--
I
1>-
\~::; 1;"/\
z :>
:> 0
010
o II:
IU Ii!
.J
,\If W ..J
... 0
lEt). 0
I
___ --J
..
--
'i.~-,,,-, '~(t"'\ 1n
\1~.."'1:1 -'4
..",:~...,IJc:
'~:'t' ,1
:.... ,.: r---
\".
'~.
..,',
~~~ ,
, ":) ~; ,
I
! I
.:~!l!LI.tFl9JECT SITE
.. . . s"~I~cs'l 1 \
'I..' 'I" 0, I
1 '..' ~ .
". ",'
Q
"
...
~
,
'.
,
,
I
...,..-
I
I
. t
i
!
I
j'-
I
1
-,I:
I'
, I
"
~
~
'1 '.
, '
'r-
.
...
},
"
,. J 1-:'d4~ II '
_.__..._ 1... ,,_~-
, ,
., I '... f, .:;d-r I
I. u.c.~::it ( ':')
1 ,:. r ~!~ 'lif i I j1q
'\ ' : t~1 I r:
-
('l
.....,
, ..
.1'1
N
, ~ J \' _~ ; -. .
:;j';-
I ,
',...,4
').:7 L}:-;::..-} ..... . '1(.'.
1; =.(~]~)"1 J" ;~tM
Ji.:tJ.bOI1 1'L(;Il,".i'!;. ~:~
_t br:,~ ,:......L~~:q::- r ," ....
. ':) ~~ ud.i:.
'r'; (..,,~ .j'.~ i
,U:::;;]l ((
{, ,^. :"~'';' .{, .~;. l~ ;~. "
". ,~
...
'i:'f:~;,
1 \\:..:""..
I : J.,
. ~,
,""
q.:.,~
:.l'/'j
;-l~ i l""" ,
36..'
, . 'I, J
.27; I" l'
.., ..~"... .
-"-~!, d ,<>
')
)
~.-~'1i:Jr9' .IJ (cvon9) ~a~lfi.,
1.i!IJOI Ii J:~.-JI_\ 11,~.)rJ. tL:;:Y_l j ,
5 v.:1, I !ObflC'};i
Clmqv!u'.c'ALE"jNri.mfrt-HO ,gil.:t
'r,-,
'"
....: .:~'~,,: t" .
. , ,V;' ~
....
..,'
'I
e
.
'N
M
o
(.!)
0...
o
o
o
DESCRIPTION OF APPROVED PROJECT AND STATUS OF LAND USES:
The Parklands Development of Regional Impact Application For
Development approval was approved 'initially by the Collier:County Board
of Commissioners on September 10,:1985 .: "The portion of, ,the (parklands
DRI lying' in Collier county', contained '965.4 acres. ,The'l:approved
Development Order 85-4 was fora project-of 2,410 residential (single
and multi-family)' units on approximately;498.7 acres at a ,density of
2.5 units per acre; recreation open space (approximately 466.7 acres)
to include a golf course ~n~ clu~lapproxima~ely 165.~ e~rc~), ~ 7.23
'Ie:8 County P:.rk ..ite, n tifteen (15) acre school site,.,'grounds
maintenance facilities, central:water and sewage facilities, and ,the
required rights-of-way and/orroads.; , ,",;.
At this point in time no deVelopment has occurred on the portion of the
Parklands DRI located in Collier County. .
The proposed reduction to the land area, covered by this Development
Order is coupl~d with e prcpo&al to reduce the total number of dwelling
\mits, original:., al.L'~;lori::Gd at 2410 dwelling units to 1603'dwelling
units, while keeping constant the originally authorized number of
dwelling units per acre of 2.5.'
FUTURE LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS:
The subject property is designated Urban Residential on the Future Land
Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Urban Designation permits
residential development at a base density of 4 dwelling units:per acre
with the potential to increase or decrease this densitybasediupon the
provisions of the Density Rating ,System. The property is ,'not within
the Traffic Congestion Area., Road interconnections are not provided to
properties adjacent to the east or' west, though' it is' physically
'possible to do so, resulting in a one unit/acre reduction from the base
:density (4-1=3 d.u./ac.). The Urban Designation also permits a variety
of non-residential uses, as identified in the Future Land Use
Description Section on page LU-I-22, including parks, open space and
recreational uses; community facilities such as schools; and utility
facH i ties.
t"";
""')
The current and revised density will remain at 2.5 dwelling:units per
acre, therefore based on the type of uses authorized and the density of
housing the proposed amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use
element of the Growth Management Plan. ''''',':),1 R_T;~; .'
"
.;: ANALYSIS:
~(J ; L
:\':.!
.,
.1
.:J
'J
(,
~ ):,Ci.,!
':.1 :":."J!.:
in a, reducti.on in l!l:1d
obviously leads to the
a lesser i.mpact as an
-~ ,The' change to the ,Development Order" resulting
area and proportionate reduction in land uses
conclusion that the Parklands DRI will have
1--:-'-:;;",-';" "--"'--1
r ;},;'~.... '1' ~~", .
,
I
, I.';.~:. ,< JUi" ,..t:.
l_:"-~:~i~._"j~ 33:i
,.,:c~~:E~)
'. ,.'/'...,.....
........ ....--- -~_.
1..'1"', t""'"
, .....'.'i'-y
;-";i'"_I,,'),.:"\:.
1It~;'_e~ii';;'~. '~ .
~t. . ..... ~:?j~;(
~t.1'.::/:.' <',. "':\':'.,;'?, ,
.,',
;.1 -2~:JUL 2 7 1993
:~;,-~~_t~~i~~- ,~;~~~j:.;'~tt~~{! i;::, ::':i:~.:;~:Y':~;'>""
':';"'.il:(;~~:ff.f,~~ ,jl~::'~:':~:~~';';\''''<1i/f,''''-1 "";'-
;,;'>: "S'~f,:~;~',:;Ai::"'I:.i,~,-, '."~'" , - ,: ,'~ ~ ,"
,.,-g
'.~
..~
.',
.,>
!..: ."
independent unified plan of development than it would. have had, at. its
original size. Given this fact staff is of the. opinion.that a
determination ought to be made that the proposed changes' to the
previously approved Development Order do not constitute a substantial
deviation pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes.
.
In t~z opinion of staff the f,lrther :nodificat~on to t~e ~rn"Jd"";-:;
. Q'=31i::.;; with cOI!U.zncem;:nt of construction and d,,'ce of termination of
the Development Order are specifically provided for by law and.bear no
relationship to the test of determining the substantial nature of the
amendment.
In a related matter the planning and transportation staff's' of 'Lee
County and Collier County met in a joint session to discuss inter
county transportation objectives. The participants unanimously
expressed concern that - north south route be preserved to provide for
a future arterial .",~d ~"t;;CC:1 Ill\Il\okalee RCJilU and i:lonita 3each Road.
The amended document should clearly provide for reservation of a public
right-Of-way along the east side of the parklands. While provision is
made for this in the current Development Order, nevertheless it was not
illustrated on the Park lands Master Plan. This oversight should now be
corrected. The amended Master Plan now clearly illustrates this road
reservation. This amendment to the P:l:-~11\nds does not chnnge any
development commitment or the timing of implementation of any
development commitment. The concern that a road be established to
. Immokalee Road will in part be accomplished by the commitment of the
Quail West developer to build a road from Immokalee Road to the'private
road system that comprises the Quail; West development now to include a
portion of the parklands if this amendment is approved. Nevertheless,.
the commitment in the Parklands Development Order 85-4 leaves intact a
provision that requires a road be constructed from the parklands to
Immokalee Road before any building permits are issued for development
in the Parklands.
'-I
'-I
:'1
:::>
t.!>
0-
o
c::>
c::~
Based on this review staff is of the opinion that the amendment to the
Parklands Development Order does not change the nature of the original
approval, and does not give rise to any new cc:ndi tion that deservp.s
immediate attention by way of new development .tipulations.
. ,1: 'r;..
'/)
')
STAFF RECOMMENDATION;
.: ;. :~, .. ;
It is recoln~encied that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend
approval of Petition DOA-93-1 the parklands (DRI) as reflected\by\the
amended Development Order to be made a part of the Collier County Board
"of COll\Il\issioners' resolution approving said Development Order am"n:ir.:er:t.
,
, )
-'
';:. !;"'.
[,
.:./
:. t,}~f ~I"'t~~('..;
/
'~;;"~'<".'
-...'_~~~t,__". ','
Ii r-:
, \ ,
! ___ -..:!::::::.,:"..._J
::.Et1f~14.>
JUL 2 7.1993
',',;' ..,,;., '.. .<
~,:" ~.:h
,,','
r..-._.--;I-;~~~.-.- .
I ~', ~ ; ....' '~ '
I "....._...~..
!
;,,".
';i,
".",;,':""'l<<!':':";~tll:':'~";".'l~-.....,.,..,,:,.,..~~1~r"'i'-'~l'''''''''''''' ,"'."" ~ ..~.. .., . .... ,.
. 'r/'\"'<;'.'~"""'~'Il.', \''''. ,'0".<. -" >,", .~4~"'.''''-' "'~./""!~'<~<<1"i1 ~~~~.~~""'!'"..'" ''':<r''' 1'1.:,~.....
". :,jj '.' . . ;",,<,,""":\:.-\ " .:Ii:f,~r'i:,:'i....,':;'ft~~i'" ','." '\,J'r'
..
.\),
;!"'~I'!P:ll\f ;~01111'I\!I-l
(';;d,ARr,D
.' '" ( r...l\
R NALD F. NINO, AICP .
SENIOR PROJECT PLANNER,:
~ I 'J\' ~
, ;, ~
','''I :'i.Ul'J:"JH ::\{r/2.&/CY'!;/..
"',, DATE I .,.;;;:J
'~:::',-i;fli r)'1\';'~:'t~:\.'~I:.i~'j\' 1.i\,!'1
< ...: '~' ~ ~ ,,\:,: 1: J.......i t'
\ ,,'T~,11H:iG:)
REV~E~:. ~) _ /
?I~/~ '/ ,-d! ~~r:('/.dA
ENNETH, W.,' BAGINSKI
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
":"."'jl',
; ,;,~ I " ; ,~, : '1
.', n,
,/;:1,,:1'.(
:SX:i/b3
l,. '/ ATE ~ , ; rl"'~'
.~~ '.'...'".'D . I -' I' ,:,.....;...... ~ \'.
1:) ~t;:'1J:,~t
.r.
:; '" q
I::~ [:1";, PI1~'..(l"."~'l ::' '!:1fioliqqA
~~~.!n(j~~
,...:'..
\...........J
, .",
. ,
ROBERT E. BLANCHARD, AICP
SITE DEVELOPMENT'~EVIEW DIRECTOR
C St)/'f~-.re-<~ ' ~ ;'~:~;','
FRANK W." BRtl1pT, AICP ,
COMMUNITY ',DEVELOPMENT
DATE, __,
" , .' . 'I ~ -'!:";;\ ,~. :~ ..
,I.;,') ;.r'~q,\
'~0,~"1
DATE
SERVICES'ADMINISTRATOR~i
.';.) ~ 1
. '.,.'',:, i ".; ;'! ;':\ ~! r, :"J:' '. i
Petition Number: DOA-93-1
Staff Report for May 20, 1993CCPC!ll1e~;'ing."::,,t.,; ;,: :' ,..j
,::;f~lj t. ~..', ,',j::'.;;;":i ();! ,:.(,)_l.t..,'l':': ~..:;.;)
has been advertisedfo):.,the: June,iS ,:1993 BCC
This Petition
meeting.
NOTE:
IRMAN, .
DOA-93-1 STAFF REPORT/md
coMi-iI~~i6N~:l1.N+y~L'!:r ';, ..~ ':- :~;)
.
COLLIER CO
'. ;' ') ".~ "~.' j.I' j ':
: ~ ...
'r.,'.
:it,
:.l:.:j!! "
'! '
',' ;
FRED N.
J;"
,"
:'i
"I)
. .rt
"
1
.- " . ..~ ."
"",,-,
1'"_
.C"'>
,('J
M
o
(.!)
c..
c-
O
o
.' ;
,. . ~
. .
f:nr.. ,::~Jc ,: ;;1'):,)
. ',;") f'Jd
Cry
~.',:)
~,)
..iJ
l..:;:)
C.:l
(.::>
, ",' ,') ~; ,'J ..!J ~jjr:_: ur:1
" t.
",,','t/l, ,n,; ,,~\.~' .dli'1Cn .tj ..tllr.di!noitr.~'~ '.'~I bhri ai ~ltiT
. _._ '.M_~~"~"'~ ,.c~~...~~.....~.~.~._'"-~...-._~.,._,~... . - ,.'_._~_.,..._-- ....---.
.l: \ 'I ')r, r..::_:..".~...:J}.~~:"~;:~:~~:?,_h) .._~'?~?~!.0:!?...~~.9.. ',!~.I:!!.J~!2.~3')!"1lSi~;'~!.!29_
I.. ,y:.t\,;.; .')jl')'H;q!t~ '0.) rhl;-j'jf) \~~t,61!P~~bf'j~~L e.1,.',~,~~qa. :tt)
;l'~;IfJ,a ,bil);
rl'UM!lC
~. -I cl I : 91:' ';",)
._-~_.... ~.. " . --'
_f,' '. :1".. .~I-.d:.1 _,__~C..!~~!~:i?M u169~ ."!nh~li 10"
.S:
.
P UiJ - 8 4-2 ':i'4)1~
~-"':'''''"'' ~""Il'I':'~~~~
I, -..j . ""1':\'- .,.... ~\ i", '
! ~'.".'" -, .... ;j'~:'l.aI3jq
: I \
FEI'" r,,";"';' ;.. '. ~ ~,/
;.( I.J.' looI;"l..,:....(, ,,/
"" . .Oi...-,-....."'-
. . I ('U'O\H~)H
"
PETITION NUMBER
UA'.rt:
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING
FOR" ,,,., "-.-,"
PUD AMENDMENT/DO AMENDMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
PLANNING SERVICES
.. ..; :C':~E!8
FL/' .;. .:._.: ...'7:~'.' "......, \::.
I.I>J3T'/.::IH
1.
Name of Applicant(s)
NatlonsBankof Florida. N.A.. lIS Truste~ ii',: j Ai3'';t
.I, . 'J"i 1i1...1r\;:j'iJ'J
Applicant's Mailing Address P.O. Box 1857
city
Naeles
State Florida
Zip 33939-1857
..01 '~'}IXffo:~
Bus.: 434 '.'3228r12
Applicant's Telephone Number: RIs.:
Is the applic,mi: the owner of. the subje.;t prOptil'ty?
X Yes No
,~..
--~- (a) If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name:'"
beneficiaries below.
::),1
(b) If applicant is corporat':'o:l u\.ll'1r than a publio . _:'
corporation, so indicate and name off.icers and major
stockholders below. :: ", 'j" . .;, ::,',\1.j
"'I";
(c) If. applicant is a partnership, limited partnership "
or other business entity; so incHcate and name ',' .' ,,1,,-' .
principals below.
(d) If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as
recorded, and list all other owners, if any.
:.: ~:'.!
..:r
('oJ
'M
C>
(.!)
a..
C)
(e) If. applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease,: and"'-":';
indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease.
(f) If applicant is a contract purchas~r, atcach r.opy of
contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address
.below.
TltI,!!~ held by Natlonsbank of Florida. N.A., lIS Trustee. The list of trust
CJ
C>
2. Nama of Agent Neale Montgomery
'","
. , . ,
';,.,:"i.Agents Mailing Address
'~:"";:-;'~:~;i,{t':( ,', ",',. ....
""':"{:".}" ': city" ::ort'Myers
"",~.,,}r:1~j~,~ ',~');:';'iJ~~'(-,.""
>"4~1i,.lap~OPa.lNWIIb~:'..Jl.ea .
'{~':~' "" ,":,:, "ftt~~i~':~~:;I"~"'~Tl,~JJ.,~1~n" I
''''-':';'"'-'':",:;);,,:,,' _,~"~, ,.,1" ,,_~,~...., l,
;'l " I :';"H:;.:.,H'~>" '_ " .
j ',: j~;,:~:~,~t~ei.V~ :.!UL" ,:
.l.1fl;;>-J'4c. " ..,'
". ~- :'\1;,':: '" '.,' "..Z::" ~':\:f :,~.~ "'-~:~~<~:4.':
,'''f 1'1)'"''''
;,',;Y.
1
.
;', )1',.-".
,"",,',
.
...
f')
')
,~:)
(...:.)
.
".,<., ;" ~ ., l' ~:::-: 1 ;':";':l( ,'nn' '10 ;:~,.'IJ"'i:'"1 " ;;,A (~JU{ '.0 [
3., PUD ORDINANCE NAME AND.il1tJMBER:- Th" Pukl.nrloPllD OrdlnBn~fI'85-46: Developmer
Orc:!~r 85-4 amended by Resolution No. 85-267.
4. DETAILED' LEGAL DESCRIPTION, OF THE PROPERTY COVERED Bl(. THE'
APPLICATION (If space is !riadeqiiate,attachjon ,a.epiSr'ate P~9~.'iAIf
request involves change to more'than one zoning district, include'
separate legal description for property involved in each dis~rict.
If property is odd-shaped, submit five (5) copies of survey (1" to
400' scale). ""
;to,
THE .""PLICANT
DESCRIPTION.
AN ENGINEER'S
IS P.ES1>ONSIBLE l"l\R SUPPLYING THE CO);~ECl' L;:;r:~.!.
IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION,
CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED.
SECTION
q
I
TOWNSHIP' ".It 8 "" c:;
. /) I -t:::..' \-1
~C;E . nL..lC')'.{:":::' "J. . '" (\!J
J,; , . , " . " ,,;':. .~ ,) I' .
less the south 60 feet,' arid Section 9,
As orlalnallv ~ooroved: The east half of Se~tion 8.
'rewn5~jp 48 Sou!!l,..I:.1.nc:~ :'6 !Out. Collier Countv', Florld~, ~
"r._ I,,::,
,
As belna modified: Section 9, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. Collier County,:
Florida.
5. Address or location of subject pr~r~rty
East of Quail West, south of the Lee/Collier county line.
6.
.
7. TYPE OF AMENDMENT:
o
o
8.
"; .. :;.IC:) ';~t
X Yes
0-'
')
.'?
":J
~.)
."-.)
:,)
,'.J
,.;;:)
IJ')
,N
("")
o
~
c..
~A. PUD Document Language Amendment
o
, ,
..1LB~ PUO Master [Plan)\lU8fldment
I
X C. OQvelcp=ent Crder Language Amendment
" .. <
DOES AMENDMENT COMPLY WITH THECOMPREHENSI'vi'PLAN:
No If no, expl.1p~__..".,.,-....-.,~
.,' ,'. (
i .1.J^-<tliHJll:.u..... 1
HAS A PUBLIC HEAltING~,BEENrHELD.'ON,.'l'HIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE
LAST YEAR? :IF so,tM.~'W~~~i!~?~~.
.;,;;,;,' PETITIoN I:" "" DATE:
:-,"\.","'-".,'" -""
""';,,'~ .\'1,'~,',.' "';;"->1 ' ri"'H( ~O~~OA ," ',', ' "
,." ,~/ I' '~"i ,,~ .~ ' "
1 "", ".~.' /'" ',"f#"~-''''.", "'."
'~~""'~:"_) l::;",..;~ ,.~. I ~,., .,::; '",'... ,: ' 1:
. '" ",,0>' JL, ",". ' ..,"" jl.t~";.,,.,
".' ' '," tl ~~:' ',: t"..:_, ' ;. .,' ,\','::~',., ',J~,r..;~
''''''''1 ""l' "'j,('" "'--""',"")~""~
h'(" ;';"'~It~:;' 1'; "'" ' 'Y '." ~~ '
9.
]"",::, ,
U)
N
("')
C)
c.!)
a..
='
C)
C)
10.
HAS ANY PORTION OF THE PUD BEEN yes, SOLD AND/OR no
DEVELOPED? :ME ANY CJlANCtS: PROPOSED" FOR, THE ,-AlU:A.' SOtD AND/ OR ' ~
D~';ELO~ED; "
'X 'Yes.';'! 3>>o.1(]I'fJ:d:sVDESCRIBE:' (AttAcnTJa .:
ADDITIONAL SHEETS, IFNECESSARYji;!'lLCrll " '. c.::,.',:;;,;.', :',01 T,~:)r,l'i'(A' .
',. ~.r. !--no rthf\J f:,"tOfiT ()) '.'l".:r ;': . "', c"/rtl :'t~~4:.Jp-:'t~
The east half of a-qa-26 has 'b!!en"sbld t6the-'Q0a11 Wut developm/mtdr.'rr,'1 n
\', ",:,--.1, ..,:........1",;; \l.!:' .J.: ",! \'.J'l!Jr~O~tq )I
orqanlzatlon and Is the subject of a PUD amendment application to 'expand' (Jr,;,
the Quail Wp.si p,'olect.
';'.J..,/
'..)j,'.~-"i.i.HJi.','::'"
'::i:::"~'''~)vf:i jff
. . A'FF!CA VIT ;:
<'f' ,.,""
'" ,
We, NatlnnsBank of Florida N.A.:" as trl,l!tAe):>eing first duly sworn,
depose and say ,tha t we are, the ,owners; ot';tliliTproperty, describe'd,r:r::, 2-
herein and which is, the, sub~.ct,~at~.r of the.propose~ he~ring;
that all the' answers to th4'l;ui.tlon.r:'il1 rthUl, application,' I ~nd,Lall/
sketches, data, ~nd nt.her supplomentary m~tter attached to and
:r:,ide a part of ',;.-'.5 ~,.,pj,iclltion,...arQ'hcr.G:!t an' ':.~ue to the l:ltJ;t'..
of our Knowledge and belief. ,We understand this application must
be completed and accurate b'afore' a 'hearing 'can b. advertiucl.'..~,; We
further permit the undersigned to act as our representative in any
matters regarding this Petition., " Co,' " . ,
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF ALL OWNERS. AnB ~j:m.~':'ORY. '
I ,:- '.~:\
Lku ~, ~
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
Elsie Roberts
Client Service Officer
, NationsBank of Florida, N.A., as truste~,
1,) ;,~t'd
...._...-.~-
:'; .:~'J'.)O
"1",'F1
,.,:':') ',"
,-,
;. .'
,; .~., .
.'. ,~, " - .
, 'SIGNATURE ,OF OWNER
I, ,
.
:'.';;',7".)
SWORN '1'0 AND SUBSCRIBED
19 ~3
Harrison &
Jensen
. ~~ . u_~ :":
. .'J'i'
aV:~ff Dalton,
OF (.
. " ",1.\
"
( . no ~.
'.' ")
')
.. j.:
I, .:.ll?tiU~,',\nfiJ '1~lb'Ia.:[:~.~r;",",~~ ').1 ') >:
,)
,"':>
r,,)
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES!
1"~~','..J...,I ~n.4.a"'.'1 .......f110:). 'rl<,;'~;;,";':~ '~,\ 23:0a
.8
1<'9 ,,'j:l '~~. ~l
it:;.".,
.~
POD APPLICATION _.., ,_
1--:-~'iT;i}~;r;::, ';'1
'\.~-l'I'.'" ..
I ...~:...l_'. I
..... " ,
", ~' .
...",,' "'" I'
'.'.'.. t', ~...;;;: "..N:~ l
~~ " ' ,
~:' . ..
l~i"W.
':. ":,::,:,~~~
r~e' .. (>'J"Ul,.
\ot 1,1,,",,
'"
,
.
Dewey Gargiulo
ParklandsWest
15000 Old 41 North
Naples; Florida 33963,
:.:i:~\ ~1:}ITUJO'?'J}t
:T','.n"'~" ,~^ ,.:';'(!8
24.672%'''1:'' ,'WiMV,'JIv-JO
..' 1';. ;:lc1 ;;,;:t':I,;.lrJoq:-q-
:- '!') ;UTIT'3:irr
,,1" 1':'';1,1t'cHt
':! ; W) r~f :r~',)2~d:
, , ;t;;%~Ci\t1-:;tH't'
1:.::..11 '1';1"","')1"
Jeffrey Gartjiu!o ':,,260%,
Parklands West
15000 Old 41 North
Naples, Florida, 33963
John R. Gargiulo 2,250%
Parklands West
15000 Old 41 NMt~,
Naples. Florilla 33963
Lisa Gargiulo 2.250%
266 Central Avenue
Naples. Florida 33940
Joseph Proeaeei 30,175%
3665 South LBwrenee 5t,
Philadelphia. PA 19148
.
Michael Procaeei 28,186%
The Vineyards Development
20 Nappa Blvd,
Naples. Florida 33999
r-
'N
, C"?
Cl
""
c..
, c:>
, c:>
c:>
. ~. ":,: (. ~.
Michael ProeBeei, Jr. .663%
The Vineyards Development
20 Nappa Blvd,
Napl~s! Florida, 33999
, .~ ~., /,.;l. ..
Annette Proeaeel .663%
The Vlneyardt Development '.
20 Nappa Blvd.
Naples, Florida 33999
.!;';.: f II r ,I ':: r ~ ill" 'I'
",(,'.':) ,',"
1"X1:5
.,,'i'At.
..~; :!") ("..
:."', ~ "1);:' :1:~,:C:i.1C'f
;:,:~,.~q':\I',\,'~I.] '.UII'fWr
'~;'.\1 IJ:rn. n:a3'dt
:';,,^ ll~fllll
.",'
',:',: :/..-:"!,>it~l.JtJr:'
:~z :!tMMt".>
'j"~' :? r.l: :;) I,.tA
.; ; GJO:VOH'1'
: :," lJ~H~O')
"'~':lJ'H
. "; . '<. ~
'I : .~;H;
~ " ':- I .'~ ht'
. ~. ; ;i,_:'" ~1 ::
'j ,--, .J;~A
,1 ::~: ;:q..]~~/I,
> ~r:'.~ " l',"!<::i '; l,~
: ~'::,i,:; ; 'f'~Al
, U~-i'.:)"':'::l:V:!:1
":n")J1'1!l
; ~.,1,':i sn)
,,';,r.:! :'1;;'"
- ;.,':n':~,:l b~v~'~q1h
'",~;L... :';~C': ,Pt '-::"~:
-:,,'1t-~,':;:~',q -Jrir..1S n......m:.{ i;.::'.,"
::. ,! it;,:;;'., ';.ri:! . ~A,t\:J!\W
,. r ('~ ,'t 1
l: ~I ~'I.', ~. ~,
!JI':-l'! "
0)
'/1
)
, '~l
~',J
,
; ..~' .: ",
, l ~. { J]
,,,... ~,.,.
.,u ~ ,;:uL (l,Lupf'.L al,'1:ltb1G
J"..tt:;~o
tn.e: i '1D.b;~'? ~.;jrrer.(t~! .Vf.\J
jQ &11:\1(11.70.. .i1~.:t,,<~AJ~:imW
',-)
o
(:.:;J
" .,. ,'.'
. ,!.",;...'"'.;',.
ona; ~~f:~Q.,,'-;tlt'~JI:~bt.v.C
: ".::'(:,: ,::t'~, "~,,d?,"
, <~~'\~~CjO"":"!o! ., [t!'l'~;,~',~7';.~1rJ,
g.r!1-
JULY 27, 1993
DEVELOPMENT ORDER 93-
1
RESOLUTION NUMBER 93-~
A RESOLUTION AMENDING DEVELOPMENT ORDER
85-4, AS lIMENDED, OF THE PAR',(LANDS
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DR!), BY
PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE A WHICH AMENDS
THE TITLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO
REFLECT REVISIONS TO THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTION; SECTION ONE B WHICH AMENDS
THE FINDINGS OF FACT TO REFLECT REVISIONS
TO THE LEGAT., DESCRIPTION; SECTION ONE C
WHICH AMENDS THE FINDINGS OF FACT SECTION
TO REDUCE THE ACREAGE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE
ENTIRE DEVEI~PMENT AS WELL AS TO CERTAIN
IDENTIFIED USES THEREIN; SECTION ONE 0
WHICH AMENDS THE CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
TRANSPORTATI0N SECTION, TO REFLECT A
CHANGE IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE
ALIGNMENT OF THE ACCESS ROAD TO BE
PROVIDED; SECTION ONE E WHICH AMENDS THE
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, TRANSPORTATION
SECTION TO REFLECT A REDUCTION IN THE
MAXIMUM lWMBER OF RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED; SECTION
ONE F WHICH AMENDS AN UNTITLED SECTION OF
THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE
INCORPORATION OF THE AMENDED MASTER PLAN
AND PUD DOCUMENT; SECTION ONE G WHICH
A11ENDS THE REQUIRED DATE FOR COMMENCEMENT
OF DEVF:LOPMENT; SECTION TWO, FINDIWlS OF
FACT; SECTION THREE. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW;
SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
DEVELOPMENT ORDER, TRANSMITTAL TO DCA AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
llHEREAS, tlua Board ot county c:o.au.ionar. ot COllier County,
Florida approved Development Order 8!,"4 (the Development Order) on
September 10, 1985 which approved a Development of Reqional Impact;
(DR!) known as The Parklands; and
WHEREAS, the Applic~tion for Development Approval (ADA) was
incorporated in':o and by reference made a part of the Devl!>lopment
Order; and
WHEREAS, the real property which is the subject of the Devel-.
opment Order is 1eqally described and set forth in Exhibit "A" to, the
Development Order; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the DRI property are desirous of a"endinq
the Development Order; and
WHEREAS, Neale Montqomery, representing The Parklands, petitioned
the Board ot county Co~issioners of Collier county, Florida, to amend'
the Oevelopment Order; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planninq Commission has reviewed and
considered the report and recommendations of the Southwest Florida
JULY 27, 1993
Plannin<1 Council (SWFRPC) and held a public hearing on the
on May 20, 1993; and
WHEIUlAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County has
reviewed and coneidered the reports of the SWFRPC and the C,'llier
County Plannin9 Commission and held a public hearing on the peti1:ion on
July 27, 19S131
If OW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER
A. The Title to Development Order 85-4, as amended, for the
Park lands is, hereby amended to read as follows:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85-4
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOIiERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR THE PARKLANDS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN SECTIONS & AN9 9, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
B. Paraqraph 1, Findin9s of Fact, of Development Order 85-4, as
Amended, for the. Parklands, is hereby amended to read as follows: '
1. That the real property which is the subject of
the ADA is lagally described as $et forth in
Exhibit A, the Planned Unit Development
Document for The Parklands, attached. hereto
and by reference made a part thereof is herebv
emended for the DurooseB of reducina the area
covered ~v The Parklaltds Develocment Order
85-4. liS amended. so "t;hat the area is now
~escribed ap follows:
1ha east one-half (E 1/2\ of Section 4,
Igwnshio 48 South. Rance 26 East. Lee Countv.
Florida
AN12
~sction 9, Townshio 48 South, Rance 26 East,
Collier County. Florida~ containina 966.31
~cres more or less (both counties).
C. Paragraph 4, Findings of Fact, of Development Order 85-4, as
amended, for The Parklands, is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. The applicant proposes the development of The Parklands
Planned, Unit Development, for ~~ acres;
il~~ residential (single and multi-family) units,
on appro<<imately ~.u.L.1. acres at a density of 2.5
units per acre; recreation open space (approximately
~~ acres) which will include a golf course and
club (approximately ~~ acres) a 7.23 aCre County
Park site, a fifteen (15) acre school site, grounds
aDDK 000 PAr,t 190
JULY 27, 1993
maintenance ::acili ties, central water and sewage
facilities, snd the required rights-of-way and/or roads.
D. Subparagraphs a, band c of Paragraph 9, Transportation
Conditions of Section A, Conclusions of Law ot Development Order
. 85-4, a. amended, for The Parklands, is hareb:! amended to ra.at:l as
follows:
9. TRANSPORTATION: The Park lands DRI site is currently
accessible only by a gravel road on the north border in
Lee County. Development of the DRI will require paving
and extension of Carrell Road to the east, constn'c~ion
of access roads to the site fr.om the f1ertho,'estJJ2D:.1:l and
south, and provision of roadway improvements along
Immokalee Road in Collier County.
Conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of any construction p..rmits
for the Park lands Phase II (Year 1991), the
applicant shall commit to construct or cause to be
cons~ructed at no cost to the local government, an
access road and intersection improvements deemed
necessary by the Lee and Collier County Engineers,
running "erth',lestIl21:th and connecting with Carrell
Road. This access roadway shall be completed prior
to the granting of any certificate of occupancy
within Phase II.
Following the initial construction by the applicant
of the "ertlweftt,Il21:thand south access roadways,
these roadways shall be place:! under a monitoring
program to ensure that level"of-service C is not
exceeded during buildout of the Pnrklands.
Prior to the issuance of any constructionpormits
tor the Parklands by Collier County, the applicant
shall commit to construct or cause to the
constructed at no cost to the local government an
access road and in tersection improvements deemed
necessary by the County, Engineer running south and.
connecting with IlTIJIlokalee Road. This access
roadway shall be completed prior to the granting of
any certificate of occupancy in Collier County.
b, Becauso E,evE\ral large developments have been
proposed in this area, there is need for a major
collector between Carrell Road and Immokalee Road
through the parklands proj ect. . Therefore, the
applicant shall provide or cause to be provided a
major collector road through the parklands or
donate right-of-way on the eastern boundary 'of the
Parklands not to exceed 75 feet,' subject to ,the
approval of the Collier County Engineer.
If riaht-of-wav acauisition/dedication and/or road
construction obliaatlons which are imDosed bv this
develonment order cannot be accommodated bec~~
environmental Dermittina. water manaae~
hazardous waste. archaeoloa!cal or other
consideratioDs relatina to the nature of the
nroDosed alianment. Dubliclv anDroved and,
functionallY eauivalent alternatives which do not
increase the Park lands richt-of-wav donation and/or
road construction oblication mav be substituted
however. a Notice of ProDosed Chance DursuaD.L.t..g,
Chanter 380.06 Florida Statutes shall be reauired.
~OOK 000 PI'.' 1 ~1
i' "
,
..
1,>-
~'.. .
, t~<
J..
t.'
lt1z'
{
JULY 27, 1993
c.
At the time that any portion of the following
roadways is found to exceed level-ot-service "e"
(by thf> Collier county Engineering Department or
other appropriate County Department), the aprlicant
shall become obligated to pay a proportionate ~hare
of the cost of the total improvements necess~ry to
maintain level of service tiel!:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Immokalee Road from CR 951 to Park lands' south
access
Immokalee Road from Parklands' south access to
Oak" Blvd.
ImlUokalee Road from Oaks Blvd. to Airport
Road.
parklands south access road from Pa~klands
boundary to Immokalee Road.
Parklands ner~w.:eB~~ access road from
Parklands ~ boundary to Collier County
line.
E. Subparagraph 2 of Subsection C of Paragraph 3, Transportation,
of section B, Conclusions of Law of Development Order 85-4, as
amenaed, for The Parklands, is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Notwithstanding 1. above, the maximum number of
residential dwelling units permitted within ~ Collier
County portion shall not exceed ~~~ single family and
915 mUlti-family units.
F. Paragraph 1, of an. U11ti tled Section of. Development. Order
85-4, The Parklands, is hereby amended to re<<d as follows:
1. All commitments and impact mitigating actions provided
by the applicant in the Application for Development
Approval and supplemental documents and the application
for Public Hearing or rezoning and supplemental
documents that are not ,in conflict with conditions or
stipulations specificall y enumerated above are hereby
adopted to this Development Order by reference. An
Amended Master Plan and pun Document dated 7/?7/Q~~
~ttached hereto and bv reference incornorated here~
~ar.t of this amended develonment order.
G. Paragraph 3, of an untitled Section of Development. Order
85-4, as aDlended, for The Parklands, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
3. This Development Order shall remain in effect for the
duration of the project. However, in the event: that
significant physical development has not commenced
within Gsllie.. Ge,,"ty 4;eft ~ fourteen 114\ yellrs .in
~ollier Countv, development approval will terminate and
this development order shall no longer be effective.
For purposes of this requirement "significant physical
development" does not include roads, drainage or
l.,ndscaping but does include construction of buildings
or installation of utilities and facilities such as
&DDK 000 PIG! 192
.'
i"\
'I.'
1,'::1,;\;:,
"~(
, ~.")"
; ,'~i,;'.'.
'iI~!{J .
U:"""
~~,'.;->"
"-p'
It.~
~l~
~ ~l_.:
llh
~'}.,
'{>~'
'i~.'
~:i
~"..
, ,;{':~:'
ll'~\:'
it
>t"""
'!!{
;,'l'i"
:;t-~. :
,\lv,
,'F:>:
, ..'
'-;j'f
;,
'.- 'J~~;,..
J.
~:,
~-
JULY 27, 1993
sewer and water lines.
by the Board of County
Developer in the event
delay the commencement
This time period may be extended
Commissioner~ upon request by the
that uncontrollable circumEtances
of deVelopment.
SECTION T~IO,
FINDINGS OF ~
A. That the real property which is tho subject of the
Substantial Deviation ADA is legally described as set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
B. The application is in accordance, with Section 380.05(19),
Florida Statutes.
C. The applicant 8ubmitt8d to the County a Substantial De?iation
ADA and sufficiency responses known as composite Exhibit B, and by
reference made a part horeof, to the extent that they are, not
inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this order.
D. The applicant proposes the development of The parklands on
642.2 acres of land in Collier County for residential, recreatio:1al and
open spal:'U uses.
B. The proposec1 changes to the previously approved Development
Order ar.. consistent with the reptJrt and recommen~.a1:ions of SWFRPC.
F. A comprehensive ~eview of the impact generated by the
proposed changes to the previously approved development has been
conducted by the County's departments and the SWFRPC.
G. The development is not in un area designated an Area of
Critical State Goncern pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.06,
Florida Statutes, as amended.
SEL'TION THREE: QONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. The proposed changes to the previously 'approved Development
Order do not constitute a substantial deviation pursuant to S$ction
380.06(19), Florida Statutes.
The scope of the development to be
pel~itted pursuant to this Development Order Amendment inoludes
optll'ations described in the Notice of Change to a Previously Ap;?roved
DRI, Exhibit B, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
B. The proposed'changes to the previOUSly approved DevBlopment
Order are consistent with the report and recommendations of the SWFRPC.
''',",10'
nnn" .int}'
~.
!i<',':
~i
v.f
it'
> '
lIt:
::.:....-.'
","
I";
.t:
f-
~'"
" c..
"
.I~~
f
'~,
-,J
,;
-,r;.'
I.,.,'
~r .
~.
!~';'
'.::
,JULY 27. 1993
c. The proposed changes to the previously approved development
will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives
of the ad~pted state Land Development Plan applicaale to the aree.
D. '~'he proposed changes to the previously approved development
are con. intent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan a~~ the
Collier County Land Development Code adopted pursuant thereto.
~. The proposed changes to the previoUSly approved development
are consistent with the state Co~prehansive Plan.
SECTION J'OUR:
EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER.
TRANSMITT}lL TO DCA AND EFFECTIVE ~
A. Except a. amended hereby, Development Order 85-4 shall remain
in full fQrce and effect, binding in accordance with its terms on all
parities thereto.
B. Copies ot this Development Order 93--1- mhall be tran3mitted
immediately upon execution to the Department of Community Affairs,
Bureau of Land and Water Management, and the Southwest Florida Regional
Planning Council.
C. This Dev.lo~ment order shall take effect .s provided by law. .
~E X'r FURTHER RESOLVED that '.:his Resolution be recorded in the
minutes of this Board.
commissioner Volpe
offered the foregoing
Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
Norris
and upon roll call, the vote was:
).Y:l:S: Commissioner Volpe, tommissioner l;orris, Commissioner Constuntine,
Commissioner Matthews, and Commissioner Saunders
NAYS:
AB03ENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
Done this
27th
Julv
day of
, 1993.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLI~hOUNJ;' HRIDA
BY: f/;?u//;{::t?
BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN
')'H no {J
...~:. ,," ,.....1'/1
';',' ~',\': ATT~STi ".' '). ~ '.,
..!~";iDW~~G~ E. .BffAROcK, .CJ1ERK .
.%(i~1' ... '.:. r@t!..
',>"'1 ." .', .~
'f~),:AP:.>\{qiEo.,AS .J:$x AllD LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
,\ . . FIt".. ~ ., :\..J
02'\t-Yl'~J,; ;lj'H')29b ,;,ad
WJIVlIE M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
, , DOA-93-1 PARKLANDS/nb/9617
lOOK 000 PAr.t 194
'.
-6-
.;;
JUlY 27, 1993
"
LEGAl. IlESCllIPTION OF AllEA
COVEREIl BY
AIlENIlEIl BOtlllllAllY FOR
LAND LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY
~ "
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH
RlINGE 26 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY
FLORIDA
EXIIIBIT '"A"
lOOK 000 PIG! 195
...--.----..
:t"!OM~1~) \ "
'JULl, m93 . . '.
," A'J..- I;
...
.
",i"
o
JtlLy 27, 1991
-..-;'..'
:,?'~~;~~",;: ." '..:/ /:-
o
STAT1\: OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF REsOURCE PLAlINING AND MANAGEMENT
BOIlZAO OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive .
Tallah~ssee, Florida 32399
904/488-4925
Nor.tFlCATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOOSLY APPROVED
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
SOBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES
Sl:.bsection 380.06(J.9), Florida Statutes, requires that
submittal ot a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be
made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and
the state land planning agency according to this form.
1. 'I, Neale Montgomery, thB undersigned owner/authorized
representative of: D.wey GargiUlo, et al., hBreby give noticB (,f: a
propos ad change to a previously approved DevelopmBnt ot Regional
Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida
Statutu. In support thereot, I subllit the toll owing information
concerning the Parklands dBValopment, which information is true
and Co=ect to the best ot my knowledge. I have submitted today,
under separate cover, copies of this completed notitication to
Collier County and Lee County, to th~ Southwest Florida Regional
Planning Counc:il, and ~o the Bureau ot State Planning, Department
of Community Jtftairs.
iF''''~ '< ""q:<, ~
'. (,t~ (Sign tur ,.',
. tt
EXHIBIT ole II
lOOK 000 PIGt 196
-
"
o
n
JULY 27, 1993
. ,.-.
2. Applican~ (name, address,' phone).
Dewey Gargiulo ct al
N.T.G. Properties, Inc.
Route 2, Bcx 1700
Naples, Florida 33940
(813) 597-3131
3. Au~hcri2e4 Aqen~ (name, address, phone).
Neale Hontgomer.y
Pavese, Garner, Haverfield, Dalton, Hnlrison, and
Jensen
1833 Hendry Str.eet
P. O. Drawer 1507
Fort Myers, Florida 33902
(813) 336-6235
4. Location (City, County, ~ownship/Range/section) ot
apprcved DP.x and proposed change.
Approved DRI: 'I'he east halt of Sectilln 4, Township 48
South, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Lee County,
Florida and the east half of Section 8, less the south
60 teet, and Section 9, Township 48 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida.
Proposed Chango: Delation ot the east half ot Section
8 less the south 60 feet, Township 48 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida from the Parklands DRI.
s. Provide a complete description ot the proposed change.
:InclUde any proposed changu to the plan ct
development, phasing, additional lands, commencemen~
date, ~uild-ou~ date, development order conditions and
requirements, or to the representations contained in
eithorthe development order or the Application tor
Development Approval.
Indicate such changes on the project master
site plan, supplementing with other dotailed
map., as appropriate. Additional information
may be requested ~y the Department,or any,'
reviewing agency to clarify the nature ot the
change or the resulting impacts.
'I'he proposed change ls to eliminate the eas~ half of
Sec~ion 8, T 48S, R26E, trom the Parkland. DRI. This
halt section, 323.19 acres in area, is being sold. If:
will be incorporated into an existing non-DRI project
located in Collier and Lee County. The previously
2
aOOK 000 PIGt 197
....:-...
'....
JULY 27, 1993
approved Parklands DRI consisted of a half section 01
land in Lea County ftnd 1 .1/2 sections of land in
Collier County. No change is proposed to the land
area, uses or density permitted in Lea County.
The permitted residential density in Collier County is
2.5 unit per acre. It is proposed that this permitted
residential density not be changed, and thus the
reduction of the Collier County portion of the approved
DRI by one half section vill result in the number of
permitted dvelling units being reduced by 807, from
2,410 to 1,603, Th~ acreage reduction in the Collier
County portion of , the Parklands DRI will be from 965,4
acres to 642.2~ acres. A plan .ot the approved Colliex"
County portion of the Parklands Master Plan is attached
hereto, and is identified as "Exhibit A" and indicates
both the half section to be deleted and the road
alignment change vhich is necessitated by removal of
the half section.
The application to Collier County to modify the
Parklands DRI Development Order and the PUD zoning vill
be filed simultaneously vith an application to
incorporate the subject half section in the existing
Quail West PUD. The Quail West POD has been approved
by Collier County and is currently under development.
Quail West, like the Parklands, lies partially in
Collier County, and partially in Lee ':ounty. Quail
West is a lov density residential/golf course community
.with no commercial uses per.mitted. The previously
approved Collier County POD for Quail West Phase I
authorizes a maximum of 325 single-family dvellings and
an IS-hole golf course. The previously approved
portion ot Quail West, vhich lies in Lee tounty (Phase
II) authorizes a maximum of 225 single-family dvellings
and 9 golt holes. The half section of land vhich Quail
West is acquiring from the Parklands vill constitute
the third and 'final Quail W<3st development phase and
the rezone petition for Phase III vhich vill be
simUltaneously filed vith the parklands modification
applications and vill request approval for,a maximum of
191 single-family dvellings and 9 golf holes. Thus,
the complete Quail West development configuration vill
consi.st of two 18-hole golf <;ourses and,amaximWll of
766 single-family dvellings. A reduced Master
Dev~lopment Plan for the three Quail West development
phase. i. attached.
The.half .ection of land being transferred to Quail
West from the Parklands is an active farm field and i~
devoid of natural vegetation except for a small amount
of cypr"ss vetlands adjacent to the east boundary. Tile
3
lOOK 000 PAcr 198
-.
'f:
"'
\~- ,
.,,:
.i;".4:f:..'"
"It..
..1'~;:
,:{i;!:
.'':.i.!
.'h'
JULY 27, 1993
~
;
,..~
\
cypress wetland area is ,to be incorporated in a natul:.~l
preserve area. Jurisdictional wetla~l determinations
and any required wetland modification permits will be
acquired prior to development. The subject halt
section is indicated by both the Parklands and Quail
West Master Plans as being a mix ot residential
development area, golt course, and lakes. The
essential difterence is that the Parklands Master Ple.n
indicates extensive areas of multi-family developmen1;
within the halt section, while the Quail West master
Plan indicates only large (38,000+ square feet averauo)
sinqle-family homesites.
Adjustments to the proposed Collier County Parkla~ds
0.0. which would be necessary to accommodate the
reduction in the project area includes; reducing the
number of dwellings authorized, and making appropriate
acreage corrections. The only other Lee and Collier
County Parklands DRI Development Order changes which
are proposed is to remove the requirement for
development ot the "northwest road",. and an extension
of time for commencement of development of less than
five years.
The "northwest road" which is referenced in both the
Lee and Collier Parklands Development Orders, was
oriqinal1y deemed necessary for qener..l traffic
circulation and to provide access to the east half of
Section 8 so that residents in that half section would
not have to travel first to the east thence north to
access Carrell Road (Bonita Beach Road extended).
The incorporation of the east half of Section 8 in
Quail West will allow for tbe construction of a road
which provides the same fun:tion as the "northwest
road" by virtue of the fact that the ~treet system in
the east half of Section 8 will be interlocked with the
remainder of the Quail West Development _ the Quail
West Development is accessed by a recently developer-
cons.t~"Ucted north/south road, Bonita Granda Road, which
exte:nds from the principal Quail West entry, north to
Carrell Road (Bonita Beach Road). Bonita Grande Road,
is a tour lane divided median roadway. Additionally, a
second access road, Northbrooke Drive, connecting the
Quail West project to Immokalee Road is planned and
will be constructed when the in-process permit
applications have been approved. A letter report from
the Parklands traffic engineer regarding the "northw"st
road" and the change in traffic generation which will
result from tho transfer of the east half of Section 8
from Parklands to Quail West is attached hereto as
Exhibit B.
4
aaaK 000 PIGr 199
'.
t
I
JULY 27, 1993
-',
.
r>
,-,
, 1
:t'he Development of the Collier Countl' portion of the,
Parklands has not yet begun. The Le" County portion of
the,Parklands has initiated developmnnt in that
significant contributions have been made for
infrastructure, such as the improvements to Carrell
Road (Bonita Beach Road) and the aC~lisition of somp
necessary right-of-way. The owner of Quail West also
contributed to these improvements. The elimination of
the east half of Section 8 from the Parklands will
result in the delay of the development of the remainder
of the Parklands, because development in this area is
proceeding in a logical west to east fashion. Any
changes to the Parklands that may be made necessary hr
this change are not regionally significant in that the
removal of the east half of Section 8, and the
commensurate reduction in density will result in a
signiticant diminishment of the overall impacts, The
elimination of the east half of Section 8 does not
create a reasonable likelihood ot additional regional
impacts, and it does not meet or exceed any of the
thresholds set torth in Section 380.06(19) (b)-,F.S. The
Parklands will be developed with the same overall
percentage of open space as is provided tor by the
current D.o.
See the response to question '13 for definitive
Development Order language adjustments.
,6. Complete the attaohed Substantial Deviation
.Determination Cbart ~or all land Use typ..
approved in the eevelopment. It no change is
proposed or has occurred, indicate ho change.
No changes in land USe tyPes are proposed: The
previously approved land usn tyPes will be reduced in
proportion to the project area reduction. The
applicable information for the Substantial Deviation
Determination ~hart is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
7. Liet all the dates and resolution numbers (or
other appropriate identifioation numbers) of
all moditioations or amendments to the
oriqiually approved DR! development order
that have been adopted by the' local
government, and provide a brief description
ot the previous changes (i.e., any
intormation not already addressed in the
Substantial Deviation Determination Chart).
Has 'there been a change in local government
jurisdiction tor any portion of the
development since the last approval or
develop~eDt order Was iSSUed? It so, has the
5
lOOK OOOPIGE200
r
i
I
"
"
......
l
JULY 27; 1993
.~I
annexing local govern=ent adopted a nuw DR!
development ordor for the' project?
There have been :no prior ~odit'lcations or amendments 1:0
the originally approved DRI development order. There
has been no change in the local qove~~ent with
juriSdiction. Lee and Collier' County are still the
local governments with authority over their respective
portions of this project.
8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned with
1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent
to the oriqinal approval or issuance of the
DRI development order. Identify such land,
its size, intended use, and adjacent non-
project land uses within 1/2 mile on a
project master site plan or other map,
There have been no lands purchased or optioned within
1/4 mile of the original DRI site.
9. Indicate it the proposed change is le.s than
40% (cumulatively with other previcus
changes) cf any of the criteria listed in
Paragraph 380.06(19)!h), ~.s.
The proposed change is less than 40% of any of the
criteria listed in Paragraph 380,06(1~)(b), F.S. The
'.change will result in a reduction in land area, and a
reduction in the overall density of the area.
10. Does the proposed change result in a chang~
to the bui1dout date cr any phasing date of
the project? If so, indicate the proposed
new bui1dout or phasing dat~s.
The deletion of the east half of Section 8 will, along
with other factors, result in a change in the buildout
date/phasing date of the project. It is proposed that
the I?roject initiation and buildout date b~extended by
4 years and 364 days,
11. Will the proposed change require an amendment
to the local government comprehensive plan?',
No.
6
IDDK 000 PAGE 201
JUl,y 27 I 1993
"
'.
()
()
Provide the tOllowing for incorporation into such an amended
development order, pursuant to SUbseotions 380.06(15), P.S., antI
9J-2.02S, Plorida Administrative Code.
, 12. An Updated mas1:er site plan or other map of
the development portraying and distinguishing
the proposed changes to the previously
approved DRI or development order conditions.
See the attached exhibit referenced in IS above.
13. Pursuant to Subseotion 380.06(19) (f), r.s.,
inolude the precise languaqe that is being,
proposed to be deleted or added as an
amendment to the Development Order. This
language should address and quantity.
a. All proposed speoific ohanges to the nature,
phasing, and build-out date of the
developmen~1 to development order oonditions
and requirements, to oollllllitments and
representations in the Applioation tor
Oevelopment Approval, to the aoreaqe
attributL~le to each desoribed proposed
chanqa ot land use, open space, areas for
preservation, qreen helts, to atructuxos or
to other improvements including looations,
square footage, nUlllher of units, and other
major oharaoteristics or oomponents of the
'proposed ohange.
See attached proposed Collier and Lee County D.O.
changes. , .
b. An updated legal desoription ot the property,
it eny project aoreage is/has been added or
deleted to the previously approved plan ot
deve10pment1,'
SUbsequent to removal of the east half of Section 8,
the updated legal description tor the Parklands ORI
will be. .
The east one-halt (E 1/2) of Section 4, Township 48
South, Range.26 East, Lee County Florida
AND
'Section 9, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida containing 966.31 acres more or less
(both counties). .
7
lOOK 000 PAGE 202
JULY 27. 1993
.-
o. A proposed amended development order deadline
ror oommencinq physical development of the
proposed changes, if applicable I
The County Attorney's office, in and for Lee County,
has submitted that the date by which the parklands (~ee
County) development muot commence is November 20, 19!1:l.
The applicant would respectfully request an extension
ot tour years and 3G4 days, which would result in an
extension ot the date tor the commencement at physic:al
development to November 19, 1998. Th~ Applicant
submits that they have already initiatod physical
development in the contribution to the construction of
the extension of Carrell Road.
The amendment to the development order would be as
follows:
(page 17 of the DO) 8. The deadline for commencing
physical development under this Development Order shaLl
be ll",,,1lTV -l7J/ttljl.tll/ttp]d/1:Y."'/~jl.y,J!/Pt/jl.jf.~py,j.p,../#/y,)l'"
Pt~",t November 19. 19~, provided that all conditions
are met in a timely ~anner and further provided that
this effective period may be extended by this,Board
upon a finding of eXcusable delay in nny proposed
development activity and that considerations have not
changed SUfficiently to warrant further consideration
of the developm"nt. In the event the developer fails
to commence significant physical development of that
property identified in this development order ~j.y,)lj.,..
IWIN -l7 J/t#tll/ttp]d/y,)lJ!/~jl.y,"'/#/t",,..#y,J.p,../#/y,)lj.ll
P"'"",J.P'P]dJ!,..y,/Pt#'tJ bv Novemper 19, 199B, development
approval shall terminate ana the development shall be
sUbject to further consideration. '" This Development
Order shall otherwise terminate~ in y,YJ!""Y,t/-l~Pl/tJ!~t~
~ears and 364 davs from its approval date, unless an
extension is approved.
~t is also necessary to request a corollary
extension in Collier County. The amendment
would be to Paragraph 3, following the , "BE
IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, that: "
The amendment is as follows:
This Development Order shall remain in effect for the
duration of the project. However, in the event that
significant physical development has not commenced
within Collier County y,"',../-lJ.Pl fourteen 114\ years4
development approval will terminate and this
development order shall no longer be effective.
8
aOOK 000 PAGE 203
.~)
JULY 27, 199J
d. A proposed amended development order
termination date that reasonably reflects the
time required to complete the development;
It is herein submitt:ed that the termination data in 'the
Lee County development order should be extended from
twenty years to twenty four years and 364 days. The
precise language change is set forth in the response ~o
paragraph 13.0. ebove.
It does not appear that a termination date has been
included in the Collier County DRI 00. The DRI 00
states that the, "Development Order shall remain in
effect for the duration ot the project. 11 It appears
that properly addressing the commencement date for the
Collier County DRI 00 also addresses the termination
date.
.,.
e. A proposed amended development order date
until whic~ the local government a9ree~ that
the chang.. to the DI'.I shall not hI> sw>j ect
to down-aoning, unit density reduction, or
intensity reduction, if applicable; and
The applicant is not requesting an am(mdment or
extension of the time frame during which the project
cannot be subject to a down-zoning,
f. Proposed amended dev~lopment order
specifications for the annual report,
inoluding the date of Submission, contents,
and partie. to whom the report is submitted
as ..pecined in SUbsection !IJ-2.02S(7), ,
P.A.C. . .
The applicant is not requeE~ing any amendment or
adjustment to the annual report requir""'ents. The
applicant has submitted the annual report each year
lIinc.. the project was approved, and the applicant will
continue to provide the annual report.
13...
Changes to the Collier and Lee
county Development Orders which are
necessary to conform the
Development Orders to the removal,
of the east half of 8-48-26 from
the DRI are as follows:
9
aOOK 000 PlGt 204
"
JULY 27, 1993
COLLTF.R COUNTY D.O. CHANGE~
1. Tb~ Development Order heading is to be modified as follows:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER 85"4
DE'ir:LOPMENT ORDER 01' THE lCOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR THE PARKLAN!JS PloAN!IED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED :eN SECTION%/Jl/lQfP 9 TOlfflSHIP 48 SOUTH
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
2. Mo~ify the legal description referenced in FINDINGS OF FACT
Item 1 as E~ibit 'A", by conforming it to the legal description
providsd in response to 13.b.
3, Modi~y FINDINGS OF FACT Item 4 as follows:
Tbe applicant proposes tb.. development o~ The Parklands
Planned Unit Development, for 'Jl'/!~ acres; ~/!~Jl~
residential (single and mUlti-familyj"'iijiits on approX~Mely
J'~/7~ acres at a density of 2.5 units mr acre;
recre~ open space (approximately !JlJl/71 acres) which
will include a golf course and club (approin,a ely
):JlJl/JllllillB acres) a 7.25 acre County Park site, a ~ifteen
(15) acre school site, grounds maintenance facilities,
central water and sewage facilities, and the required
rights-of-way and/or ~oads,
4. Modify the introductory paragraph and sUbpllra~aph a. of 9.
TRANSPORTATION a. follows:
9. TRANSPORTATION: The Parklatcls DRI site is.
currently eccessible only by a gravel road on the
north border in Lee County. Development of the
DRI >Till require paving and extension of Carrell
Road to the east, construction o~ access roads to
tbe ..ite ~rom the 1I,cl#)lj#,t!}l~ and south, and
provir;ion of roadway improvemen'l:s along Immokalee
Road in Collier County.
Conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of any construction
permits ~or the Parklands Phase II (Year
1991), the applicant shall commit to
construct or cause to be constructed at no
cost to the local government, an access road
and intersection improvements deemed
necessary by the Lee and Collier County
Engineers, running 1I,cl#)lj#,t!}l%~ and
connecting with Carrell Road'~i'1is access
roadway shall be completed prior to the
, 10
lOOK OOOPlCE205 ' .
i
JULY 27, 1993
o
n
'\"'"
"
granj:ing of any certificate "f occupancy
within Phase II.
Following the initial construction by the
applicant of the }'lp#)!j#.I!,IlAi~ and south
access roadways, these "roaaways shall be
placE-.ct under a monitoring program. to ensure
that level-of-service C is not exceeded
during buildout of the parklands.
Prior to the issuance of any construction
permits for the Parklands by Collier Count)"
the applicant shall commit ,to construct or
cause to the constructed at no cost to the
local government an access road and
intersection improvements deemed necessary by
the County Engineer running south and
connecting with.lmmokalee Road. This access
roadway shall be completed prior to the
granting of any certificate of occupancy in
Collier County.
5. M"dify sUbparagraph c. of 9.TRANSPORTATION as follows:
c. At the time that any portion of the following roadways
is found to exceed level-of-service 'c' (by the Collier
County Engineering Department or other appropriate
County Department), the applicant shall become
Obligated to pay a proportionate share of the cost ot
'tbe total improvements necessary to maintain level of
service "e":
(1) Immokalee Road from CR 951 to Parklands' south
access
(2) Immokalee ~oad from Parklands' south'access to
Oaks Blvd.
(3) Immokales Road from O~ks Blvd. to Airport Road
(4) Parklands south access road from parklands
,boundary to Immokalee Road .
(5) parkl='Pt~j##~llm'!l access road from
Parlclands. boundary~~ollier County line.
6. sectionD,3.C.2 (Collier DRI 00) shall be amended to read:
Notwiths1;anding 1. above, the maximlllll number of residentIal
dwelling units permitted within ~ Collier County portion
shall not exceed ~,~ single family and 915 multi-family
units.
7, This Devnlopment Order shall remain in effect for the
duration of ~le project. However, in the event that significa~t
physical development has not commenced within Collier County ~.I!}'l
11
aOOK
000 PIGE20B
o
JULY 27, 1993
o
I.J.Jl1 :,.,ur1:een 1141 years-,- development approval "ill terminate ..nd
this development order shall no longer be effe~:ive.
LEE CrlUNTY D 6 o. CHANGES
1. : Mo~ify the legal description at the bottom ,of Page 1 as
indicated on t~. response to 13.b. .
Finding" of Fact, Paragraph A. needs to b. amended as fOllows:
A. The applicant,proposes to develop a mixed use
project including 17JlJl~~ residential
dw.lling units, a golf course, and 120,000
square feet of commercial space on
approximately J./7P'I'~ acres in both Le.
and Collier counti.s.............
2. D,alete SUbsection 0.2. from the TRANSPORTATION section of
the Development Order as follows:
71// /Jf'#}1/Y.)l~/l#/1-p)l}1y.:I /'f.}1sj.,.#t/Ij.}1~%/Y.)lI-y. ..
Y,)lNY,tl-llj.;';]dp}1j.y,P#1ls/t~ll#y.~/y:;.I-y.jj.y./j.~
}1##p/Y,p/Pt~#:ff~1l-~1~J./#/~~:ffj.#/YJ!1/pt
~)l~)l/py.)l~t/f.y,I-}1Pl-tp/I-~jj.~/j.}1/#t#Y./1Jlt/U-~ '
1-pop}1y.:I /I-y,/y,)ll-y./y.j.]d# /pt/I-~/tt4fblf.tt4Ml:l
~#Y.j.p}1/Jl/J.7/'#J.P'tI//y:;.~/#1~J.Pp~t/~)lI-J.J.
. #}1~y.t"t1~y.J /Pt/;ttt;t}1S~/Y.P/)l;t1~/#}1~Y.t"t1J!y.~P/p.y.
}1p/~#Y./Y.P/1#/pt/1-P'tJ.j.#/1-p)l}1y.#f.//;t/y.;.Ip
J.1-}1~/~PJ.J.#y.Pt/tpp.i4/Ptp1j.#}1S/p.#~~~/tt#/y.)l~
. }1PtY-)l'tl#y./1:pt}1J!t/Pt/'J"W'p.t)l.J.I-}1p~/y.P/;l-tt#J.
-p.Pl-pjj.PJ!}1y.j.tj.#/;tf./)'';I/ltY-y.'tI#Y./-p.p;tPl/p}1
'f.t-)lj.'pj.y./n, J / /'Jy.~/#f.y./'tI#y,/PPtY-j.p}1/pt/y.y.#
~PJ.J.!6~y,pt/tpI-P/;,)ip.J.l-/'Pt4/#}111Y.t"t1~Y.#/I-J.p}1;1/Y,Y.t4
~#y.j.p}1/J.j.}1~/;'j!Pp.tl-y,j.}1S/~#1-j.P}1~/'/p.}1P/P/pt
-p.;t}1SJ!/J.f.'f.//'1p'tl}1f.)lj.P/~P)l//Pt/;ty./f.op~)l/py.)l1!t
J.p#y.j.p}1/;t~jj.~/;ll1t~#/oppp}1r.tt4y.'tI~J!}1/y.y.;./U-~
1-pop}1y.:I /'f.}1sj.}1#t/I"W#1~J.PPr.tJ/ nYaN}1f.t:/.Ya
f.popy.~/PPtY-j.p}1/Pt/y.)lj.f./~PJ.J.~~y.Pt/f.)lp.J.J./~J!
~p}1f.J!.t"t1;.y.#/;tJ.p}1g/y.Ya~/f.#y.j.p}1Il-j.}1~/f.~Pl-tl-y.j.}1S
~~~y.,tp}1f./)l/;t}1P/f./Pt/-p.I-}1S~/7f.'f.//'1p'tl}1f.)lj.P/~)l)l/
pt/p.;t./f.op~)l/PY.)lj!tll-jl#.Y,l-p}1/;t;4/ j.~/;tstt4#/opPPll
)l~y,)4#-,l/Y,)lNU-j!/1-p'fl}1y.:I/'f.}1sj.-,l#t/;t}1p .
p~1~;rp-P#J/ny.j.f./;.p}1;,y.t}l~y.j.p-,l/f.Ya;f.J.J./j.1I~J.'fl#
j.}1y.~t~#Y.j.p-,l/j.;dPtp1~-;';'}1Y.f./#j!Il~P/-,l~##;f.t:I/~:I
y,)l~IY#/1-h1}1y.:I /'f.}1Sj.}1;.;.t/;f.y./y.y.j!/j.}1y,j!tf.#y.j.P}1
Pt/Y.j{~/}1PtY-)l/~P'fly.Ya/PPt:/.j.'WPt/y.y.j.;'/J!Pl-J.#y,pt
tp;f.p/'tIj.y.)l/1-;tttJlJ.J./-p.PI-PJ
1-Pf.y.~/y.p/~~/p;f.j.P/pt/p.ttp.}1S~P/tpt/)l:l/y,Yat4
P~1~):p-p~t/;')l;tJ.):/j.}1~J.'fl~NY.)l~/t)l):):/#;,y.;,/Pt
#f.j.g}1/~lIsj.-,l#tf.}1SI/'fly.j.J.j.y.:I/t~):p~;f.y,j.p-,l/I.j.t
-,lj!#JIP'U /tf.sy.y,/pt/'tII-:I /#fblj.f.j.Y.j.p}1/
12
lOOK 000 PIGE 207
:
':"
,~.
;'/".'t
J~.:
"';.",,,~:;;,:
;'....,t".... !
'<>'.'j-"
. .-!~
..'f;
:'(~Tt
".,:ti
JULY 27, 1993
o
o
~~~~~~~~t~~I/t~~/~~~/t~J~~t~t~~/~t/~t)~~t~_
t~~tJt~t~~/lt~/~~~~~~/ll/11~_/~t~~~/~~~~t~~
t~t/~~~/~~t%~~P~~/~p~~/~~~JJ/~~/~~~Jg~P~/~~
~~J~~/~Y~~~~~~/t~~t/J~~t~~/~t/t~I//1~P
~~tS~~~~~I/~~~t~~/~~~/~~~~~~~~J~~/~~~P~~Jp
t~t/~~t~/pt~jP~~/~~tJJ/~~/tppt~y~~/~t/~~~/~~p
~~~~~t/-"]I~t~#tl
1~P/~~YPJ~P#/pt/1y,n-,~tXJ~]I~~/;.y,~~J/ptP'/t#1
~~/]I~/~~~%/%~/~~/~t/~~JJt~t/~~~~~tP~I/JPP
t~~%/~t/#S~%I."'tNn/t~t/~~~;.%~~~t~~/#/~y._
~~t%y,~P~~/~~t~(//Jt/%y.P/~P'/_J~ppt/t~/rip~/~~J~
%~/~~~tt~/%y<_/]I~~p~~~tt/tt~Y.~f~tf~~tlt~t
%Y,t~/t~~~IIY,P/~Y,tJJ/~~~~t/J]I~~/~~/t~t~r.]I~~~
'1t~Y,11#1 pt/~~J-l-J#/~~~~~J#/~~/t#]I'P)lt#/~JJ
~~~~~/J~#tt#/~tI1#/~~~/~~l-l-J~t/~P~~~jp~/j.]1
~/~~]I~~]I~~~j.P]l/~~~j.P~/tt/t~/~P~P]lP~/~~~~~~~tt
%~/~Jt~j.t~/%Y,t;'/J~]I~/~t/#]I~p]I~~~j.P~1
1Y,~/#YPJ~PPt/;I~~JJ/~P%/~P/PJj.st~J~/th'/~t#t~fl~S#~Io%
~~~~;'/l-]IP#%/"#~/t~t/~~~;.~~Jt~j.~"'/~t/tj.Sy.%/~t/)I~t
~~#Jt~~J~]I;'/jI.;';'~#j!..~;'~/~J~Y,/~y.~/~~tr.y.;tf.~~/~p;..~I/;.t]l~p
%'#t /~t~/Y#%~/tpJj!..~#IY j!..;'/~Y,J~/~Pt1l/ t~/#n~#/t]l/~y,p
~~j!..~~/~]I-p~Jt%/"#/~t#"'~"'f# / /y,.p)l;4~tllt.tpPPt%tp~~~~
;'Y,j!..tP/-Pj.'/1i~~~;'/~t/t#]I'P~t~~]I~~~;./ttll]l/P~y.~t/~~Pt~/#
~Y,~;.~/tlltP~/;'Y,j.l-J-IIj.t/Il~~tj.]I~~I/t~~~~~/~Y.P/~Il~~/~Il/1Y,_
lj!..t'tJ~]I~;.' /#Y~JIl.#t/Jt/;'~PPIlt%PP/~t /;~Y.P/t#~J~~/#/~
]I~)I/%tttn~/J]lPtJt~/j.j'.iI.~~]Ip]I~/~~/;.~t~#/tJW~~-pttt~ttPy,.
. N/}l~l-Il'l1
Modify D.3. as follows:
3. The developer of The parklands shall construct, at
no cost to Lee County, two paved lanes on carrell
Road from the existing payment east of I-75 (as of
the date of this DevelC'lpment Order) to the eastern
boundary of The Parklands. The construction of
the section o~ Carrell Road extension ~rom the
oxisting payment east of I-75 tO~L-_
~1l~~/t~t#t#/%P/j.]I/1#.%tp~/Y,/~1 0 .. . lltlj ~~f9
shall be scheduled so that the Carre oaa -,
improvements are completed before ~1l~~~~~%tp]l/pt
'~i'~~~ Uf~ efti .0:""[,1; l\~~OmPlete.
fie rema n ng see on of arre l~~~twee~~
i Y,}I#~/Jl,p~~/t##t~~/~~/J~/;l#~tll~/Y,IJ.1 i!im;1,l:'~
l;a'l. e ~ and the eastern boundary of The
ar an s shall be constructed prior to the
issuance o~ any building permits for that portion
ot The Parklands located in Lee County.
13
aOOK OOOPlGr20B .
",."
'"
.
';'I;~'
,
::.', ;~
';'f'F'
. "'~
;:i,~t.',:,~:~:
-
JULY 27, 1993
~-
I
--I
Costs to be paid 01:, arranged for by the developer
shall include the full costs of design/
engineering, ,utility relocation (if needed).
right-of-way acquisition, construction, and
relocation of drainage facilities (as needed).
The cross-section designed for this road shall be
designed to allow eventual four-laning of carrell
Road. The alignment, design, and construction
schedule for this project shall be approved by th~
Lee County Engin~er.
The developer o! The parklands shall provide, at
no cost to Lee county, 150 feet of right-of-way
for cbnstruction of Carrell Road improvements., rf
the developer is not able to acquire the necessarj
right-of-way for this road, he shall enter into ~n
agreement with Lee County to reimburse all costs
incurred by Lee County in a condemnation action if
it becomes necessary to acquire thin land by
condemnation.
The developer shall not be eligible for credits
against Roads Impact Fees for construction or
dedication of right~of~way associat->d with Carrell
Road ilnprovementu since they ara .site-related" as
this term is defbed in the Roads I"pact Fee
Ordinance. Howo.var, proportionate share payments
or reimbursements from other users of this road
shall, if obtained, reduce the cost to The
parklands' developer it supported as stated in
subparagraph 6 below.
4. Delete the second paragraph ,from 0.4., t;o"that 0.4.
will read as follows:
The developer of The Parklantis shall dedicate to Lee
County 75 feet of right-Of-way along the eastern
boundary of 'the Parklands from Carrell Road to the Lee
County/Collier County line for the eventual
construction of a north-south collector road between
Carrell Road and David C. Brown Highway.
'l')!~/~~#l-pl'#t/#;;r)!~/'j.tY>l-;l"/o#/fl.j.l-l-/j.l-;&plj#pl'IJ-#
~~tl-~t~g/;&~t~j.~~;&/j.l-pl~g/%)!~/~~~/~pl~~%t/~pll-l-t~t/~pl~~%t
l-t~~/plt/7'/t~~%/ttpl~/%)!~/~~;&%~t~/~pl~~~j.tt/plt/7)!~
'j.t~l-j.~~;&/%pl/%)!~/)!j.l-t/;&~~%tpl~/l-t~~/plt/~~~%tpl~/~I/j.~~
l-PP/t~~%/ttpl~/%)!~/)!j.l-t/;&~~%tpl~/l-j~~/t)!tpl~g)!/7)!~
'j.t';tl-j.~~;&/tpl/t'flP/#;&%~tJl/)l#~~j.tt/1lt/%'fl~/#~~l-pl-p~~~tl/
l-t/t'fl~/~~/~pl~~%t/~/ogj~~~t/~~%~~j~~;&/%)!j.%/j.~/~~%~~;&jpl~
plt/%)i~/~j.;&%f~~;&%/~Pl-l-~t%pt/t~t~tt~~/%p/t~/~~~%tp/o/~/l-
j.'t#,:/ j;&/~##t>j.tt /%p/-ptp,/j#/j.##;&/%pl/~~~/#'/~l-P-pJll~~%
j]l/t'flP/~t#~ttt/1lt/7)!~/'j.t~l-j.~~;&/plt/%pl/JlIj.t~%j.j~/l-~~~l-
14
lOOK 000 PIGE 209
",-,
'.-:J"
JULY 27, 1993
~ Ilnll~j:1I-#/Y1-Y / '(llto/tqV1,;'Jl'#J./;')I~t;'S~/ll,~:#llr /llto/1-;.ttn:,
, 'P-1l;.141 /1.)'I~to/1.~W#)I~lllt#/ll)'l;'lPI4#I-IW-IVf.)'Il-ll/#llf.t}t#1-
1~1l11~~f.lltJ//~1l/;.to/;'l1.~tto;'f.I-)l~I/}tI-f.)'I/~I~/;'PPtll)l;'1/llt/f.)'I~
~~~/1-Il~to1.t/~tostto~~tl/f.)'I~/I4~)I~1IlP~t/lltI7)'1~/y;.t~1;.toI41l/101t
tPtll)lI-I4~/;'/1l~1-f.;'~1~/~;'~f.T}t~ll1./tll;'I4/}tI-1.)'Itto/7)'1~/y;.t~1;.tol4~
~~Il~tol4;.tl-~1l1/to~;.t/f.)'I~/1-j~nf.t/ltto~I/f.tJtoS/tto/f.Il/;'141;'~~"f."
'~PtIlP~tf.t~ll/Jto/;'~~llt~;.to~~/}ttf.)'I/;'ll/;'PPlt~;'~l~
~~~S~l;'f.l-ptoll/;.to~/llP~tol4/Ptostto~~tJtoS/Pt;'~f.t~~ll/;'ll/;'PPtPI~p
l)~t /f.)'I~/1-P~tof.t /:ltosl-to#tJ / /)f)'l~toI tf./~#j6id#/to~#llll;.t'I /f.1'
"P~~JI4~/}t)'l~f.)'I~t/f.)'I~t~/}tJll/~~/;./to~~P/f.j6/~~f.~tol4/f.)'I~
~~Ptf.)'I}t~1lf./'P-P;'I4/;'141;.~~tof./f.j6/;.tol4/f.)'Itj6~S)'l/7)'1~/y;.t~1;.toI41l
'fP~~/f.P/;.to/;'PPlt~;'f.tptoltPt/lj6~;'l/I4;')I~lIlPid~tof./;'PPtj6)1;'l
.r:~lltof.;.ttol-toS/f.)'I~/Ptj6P~tf.'1/to##I4/tj6t/ll~t-)'I/;.to/;'~f.~to#ptol
1f.)'I;'f./I4P##j6to/)J)'I;'ll/~~/id;'#/'I>t/f.)'I~/):.flI!/1-P~tof.t/~tostto#~
~'I>;'ll~P/llto/I4;'f.;./}t)'lt~)'I/tll/;')I;.tl;'~l~/Pt/~;.to/~~/P~f.;.tto~I4/~'I
;#~/1-P~tof.t /}tj.f.)i'N#~f.t /lflill /14;.tll/Pf./f.)'I~/;'PP1#;.f.tptoJ/
. ; lnf.)'I~t~/ t~/ll~F)'I/;./to#I4/#f.;'~ltll)'l;'I4/~'1 /f.)'I~/1-P~tof.'1',-":",,.,;
]~tostto~~t/~;'~~I4/~PPto/f.)'I;'/I4;'f.;'/;')I;.tl;''I>lp/;'ll/;'~j6)1~I/f.)'I~
.'. ll4~)I~lj6P~t/ll)'l;'ll/ll)'lp}t/f.)'I;'f./;.tof.t~j.P;'f.~P/~~f.~tolltpto/Pto/tf.11
';lltf.~/Pl;.toll/llP/;'ll/f.j6/toPf.ttt/PtPllP~~f.t)lP/P~t~)'I;'ll;.tlllf.)'I;'1.
11l~~)'I/;./tj6;'I4/l-1l/;.tof.t~tp;'f.;'I4J//lto/f.)'I~/~)I;'tof./f.)'I;'f./f.)'I~/~P
, 1-P~tof.t/~tosttoP~t/I4P~ll/top1./~~f.;'~ltll)'l/f.)'Ip/to~~I4/tpt/f.)'I~
j~~1.~tollj.Pto/Pt/f.)'I~/~p~)'I}t;'ll1./'P-j6;.I4I/f.)'I;'/~~1~lpP~t/ll)'l;'11
.~ toPf./~~/t#bltt#./f.P/Ptp)lj.#/f.)'I~/~#ll4t'IS/ll#'I>#~ll/;'lptoS
1f.)'I~/~;'~/1-P~tof.t/1-pllt~t/1-p~to1.t/ltto~J
~The'developer shall not be eligible f~r credits against
-t ROl\ds Impact Fees for this dedication.
5. ,!:Modify the fifth paragraph of 0.6. as follows:
Except as o~erwise provided by County ord~nances, ~le
_;developer shall not be eligible for credits against
~Road~ Impact Fees for improvp-ments and right-of-way
;Idedications required in Sections 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5
~-.above since these are considered "site-related", as
~this term is defined in the Roads Impact Fees
~Ordinance, and,in Section D.4 for the reasons stated in
~that section. However, during the development the
'developer may submit a new traffic impact statement to
~the l:ounty Engineer examining the coll1bined effects of
~Bppro7ed and proposed development east of I-75 having ,
(access directly or indirectly to Carrell Road. This
ttratfic impact statement, which is'subje~t.to review
~Upon whether it meets the relevant criteria set forth
l'in Exhibit "E", shall specifically address the issue of
~~hether other developers in the area are or should be
'obligated to pay a proportionate share for construction
tof the extension of Carrell Road ;.tol4/pt/f.)'I~/~ptf.)'IP;'llf.
,'P-p;.l4. This proportionate share shall be determined by
I Lee 'County and shall be the proportion of the cost of
tthe'Carrell Road extension ;.tol4/pt/~p~)'I}t~llf.I'P-p;'14
15
lOOK 000 PIGr 210
. '. :?:O;..,
m.,'~
. ~ .~
.,-,', .'.,"\
.....(1'''.
/,..1.",.,.",
...., . ".,~ .
"..'F' ;'"
'~'~, t" t
"~',,,,'''^
.", I
o
o JULY 27, 1993
-;
project to total traffic. generated by the development
contributing to the projected traffic on these roads.
Under no circumstance" shall this paragraph be
construed to require Lee County or any successor loc~l
governmental body wIth jurisdiction over Carrell Roacl
1-""p/llt/'I-""~/''''"ff-'''';I#'I-/'''Il'# to pay 'any proportionate' ..
share ot these roads.
6. Modify D.10 as follo~s:
10. The developer agrees not to provide direct access
from Lee county to the Collier County portion of
The Parklands except alonq the Carrell Road
extension' t.hrough the Lee County portion of The
Parklands Ilt/~~. ""S/'I-""~/""Ilff-"";I~~'I-/"'Il1-P, and,only
after ~t'l-""~t road has been constructed to the
specifications ound, in this Development Order.
7. Delete D.12 as follows:
J.J.I / /"Il""~'l-t)l~'I-!-Il'/i/llt/'/.Yl~/#ffl;l~~'l-f'j'.lli!P/r.r.1-l-l-/#Fl-t
Jl)l)lJl~pt)l~'/i'l-/'l-Il/~Il'/i~'I-##tll'/i/#/'/.Yl~/"1-tt.fll-l-f'j'."'1-~
~##Jlt"'''''/;I''''~''''/''''~##/'I-'''/'f4#'''''l-1-t''''/~'#l-I'''t/~~tJI#fl/''''
1l""/'I-'fI~/"1-tt~J.J./"'Il1-~/~#;.,..~tll""//)l)l'l-/~""~J.J./Il~~)lt/""Il/J.~'l-flt
'I-""~.'fI/"p#7/J.~1 /;L~~J.I /"':t/p#"':t/'l-Il/'I-'fI#i~~.t'/-.~1'#/#/-;'''':t;
'I-""1-'/i/Jlfl1;""/'fI)l""p:t~~/l7~~1/)l'/-.!-l-pt""S/P;RI!-'l-~/~.,..t;I'fI;:t~
;It'l-'fIt.,..n'''';/11-:t}';.l-1-''''p~'/;I'fI#''''fl1fl:t/'''P!P!)l:tp/l-1-~'I-~1
8. . Modify Exhibit "A" Which is an attachment to the Lee
County Development Order, as shown on the following
page: ,
9. The amendment tn the develo;ment order shall
be as follows:
(page 17 of the 00) 8. The deadline for commencing
physIcal development under this Development Order shall
be JlI~1~'/i/l71/t;1-tJl/t:tIl'f4/'I-'fI~/P1-'l-;/"'t/1-P"'P'l-tll""/llt/'I-'fIfl
Pt~~t November 19, 1998, provided that all conditionu
are met in a timely manner and further provided that
this .affective period may be nxtended by this Board
upon a finding of excusable delay in any proposed
development activity and that~considerations have not
changed sufficiently to warrant further consideration
ot the development. In the event the developer tails
to commence significant physical development of that
prop~rty identified in this development order ;It'l-'fIt'/i
;##1/ l7l/t#.#/t:tIl'f4/'I-""~/P1-'l-~/#/t~""Pl#Il'/i/#/'I-.,..tJl
P~1~7-llpyJ.~""'I-/f':t#:t, bv November 19, 1998, development
approval shall terminate and the development shall be
subjee~ ~o further consideration. ... This Development
16
aOOK OOOPIGt211
I(.
~
~
l
I
f '"
.~
.t
I
~
;%
;2
'"
~,!
.
JULY 27, 1993
o
o
.....
Order shall otherwise terminate~ in ~~~~~t/lJP1/t~~tft
24 vearg and ~G4 davs trom'its approval date, unless ~n
extension is approved.
~I,:;'" _', .. ".tl~.I.r
~tL~;:;..
,~~~:~;i~- .
~;~;~~~:'~,:;
~~\?:
:f;,:'
:~~;"
t~]~7:
'::~
" ,~;ji;i:;
"1,'.,."-
~',():
f;,~)\'
M;1!::"
,..r;.1-:,\ .
~~U'~~:'
I._.t;,~ ,;:.
,<1;',
1""
j~?:-, .
,fit':
'1-;'
,r,:
"
&DOK 000 PAGl212
17
'",.',
~~("
f;"'"
,~;/i
"c
, ,,1',
If
'(;1':-,
)';..',.
'~. ::,~~,
..'.....:':'..,
',.J,.,;,-
~ .~. .
.' . ; . ~
c
"
" '
pnOJECTP"-ATlO'AHTS
"'T.o.~"U.1HC.
~crS'Qll$l:llIlI
.
...u.."A. 'OII.m....~
ICo.o.c of.oID WA"""' C~""U\"MT
-.Gl'O\..Il.o;:;".')'l"""."lINCliloG' ..
'SIC.UHO...:.::J'. .
"lIOI"lsiio.ui~ IftGlHU"'. I'\.ll<llftll.'"
LNlO IUflYl,OII. .
UIlA. DUMl.O' "AUO!?AT'lI. il'fC.
T~"T"TIOM TIUnlC (MOlNa''''
Q'nItLIIIWlM
~".u..T\NCIICOl.OOtST:IffC...
JULY 2,7, 1993
..
'- ,
EXfllBIT "A"
__....::-.~ I~~'~' n'.......
"
~/7/
/0"
'/
.
!:lli!:!1
r-'::-1. IlU"ltltTUI.
L.....:-J WUl,lI-r,uul..T
f'~''''-B' IlIStoUTlI1.
to,_.,. 1IIfIU-'AllA.'!'
\..._. . .
r~ COMvUtlAl._
'~I""PlIl'
~'OI.'CO\l"U.
.""flAS.'......
f"""'f""T;1Ill1\fVfla.TL
~,:ItOOU.flT1JfT
"''-''"
~~~AAU.
L....!:-JI.UU
.
'~
~
;,
...
...;.1101(11 .. "uo~,ATn . K'I'1I,",,-OCIST'
tlOU., MOH'rU , .uIOClATU, IffC.
CONIUL T\Itll '~HUII' ... l,.I.NCl SItll'lnOtl.
=== VAlli lUlU synOC
=.r..:.....l.::t...
_I(COHII....,.~
InUM
E. 1/2 8~48-26
. '
'U<_
......-.
~
.
DELE1ED ~
. ;,
...
','.+"
.
'~J'
"-
o
0(
o
...
'"
~
'~
o
>!
,3i
'l'!
.. ...--:-...
'-._----' ~L-...
7S'rvw
-: '. .
THE
PAR'KLANDS
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
EXHIBIT A.
AMENDED .IuM " '993
aOOK
000 PAGl213
"
JULY 27, 1993
BARR. rD1NLOP & ASSOC~~. INC.
CONSULIlNG ENGINEERS AND Pu.NNERS
UOI HAyS STP.EET
POSTOFACE lOX 558S
v..Ll.AHASSEE. ftOlUD^ 31)01
(904)U......UII
000 Ul-'lJOO FAX
JOHN 'VI. BAM.. r.E.. PUSIOENT
A. R. DUNLOP,]R... I'.E.. SENIOR VICE Pl\ES1DOO
.
};~,~'~: ~:
~<
~' ',' December 8, 1992
,.1.\;,}:'
;~:'.
~:~'~';
t;.'",:. Mr. William R. Vines, President
"~"V"" Vmes &. Associates, Inc,
'it,::. 71S Tenth Street, South
,~?~ Naples, Florida 33940
DearBiII: '
Re: Notice of Change for Parklands DRI
:SurrE 5-A
1201 naw $T1U'.E.T. SOlITH
NAPU.S. FLt,)A.JI)A ))9iO
(IUl) 261.1:J99
FAX "I}) 16Z.78S1
IUASfi PUtV m
Tallahas~e':
. Enclosed is a traffic analys;,! for the change of the east 1/2 ofsectioe, 8, Collier County,
from the ParklandsDRI to Quail West Phase Ill, As expected, the analysis indicates a
significant reduction in traffic impacts when comparing the Quail West Phase III
development'plan to the approved plan, Also, as we discussed, the access to this area is
served by effectively the same road system as described in the Parklands Development
Orders.
[fyou have any qu~stions. please let us know,
Su,(;erely,
;fp,fA< ,/
Richard R. Barr, AICP
Vice President
R.R.B:sh
Enclosure
t-'i(t\\P~IT
. "
P-:,
UUrAN TR.ANSPOltTATION . REGIONAL Pl.ANNlNO . Tl\ANSrr . HlOHWAY I..OCATION AND DESlON
sm DEVn.O~ . fEASlBlurt. IMPACT AND NEEDS snJOI.ES . P^R~ . TRAme ENCME1UNO
lOOK 000 PIGE 214
,.'
JULY 27, 1993
.,
'.
. BARQ DUNLOP & ASSOClATES. Q~
coNSUD'lNO f1'KjINUR5 AND PLANNERS
December 8, 1992
n
;:~":"~";
'fi .,',
'S',;
TRAFFIC IMPACT'S OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO
TilE PARKLANDS DRI PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
EAST 1/2 OF SECT'ION 3, COLLIER COUNTY
;~
The Parklands DR! is being revised to account for shifting the east 1/2 of Section g
(Collier County) from The Parklands developm~nt plan to the Quail West development.
This area. consisting of 323,19 acus, is proposed for deveJopmem' as Phase ill of Qu2.i1
West, 111i3 traffic analysis examines the changes in, traffic impacts of removing this
parcel from the The Parklands and developing it as proposed in the Quail West ill
project, which will be developed at a significantly lower density,
1..AND USE MIX
The land lIse types and quantities in the east 1/2 of Section 8 (Collier COWlty) to be
removed from The parkJands and those now proposed for Quail West ill are presented in
Table I. As indicated. the proposed plan contains 191 single family dwelling units, as
compared to 62 single family and 745 multi-family units which arc to be removed from
The Parklands. a reduction of 616 dwelling units,
TABLE 1
LAND USE QUANTITIES
THE PARKLANDS DRl
(EAST 111 OF SECDON 8)
.& QUAIL WEST 1lI
LAND USE TYPE
APPROVED
THE PARKLANDS
PROPOSED
QUAILWESTm
191 d,u.
Srrl<1lJ1 FAMlI,y
62d.u,
745 d:u,
Mln,11-FMlII,y
TlYfN,
807 d.u,
191 d.u,
aOOK 000 PIG[ 215