Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 04/27/2021 Item # 9A (Ordinance: Rural GG Estates/GGAreaMasterPlan)
9.A 04/27/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub - Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and GGAMP Future Land Use Map and RGGE Map Series, specifically to establish the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict to allow uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the Commercial Intermediate zoning district (C-3), and select uses in the General Commercial (C-4) zoning district, at a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross floor area and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property, comprising approximately 19.13 acres and located on the west side of Immokalee Road, approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. (Adoption Hearing) (Companion to zoning petition CPUD- PL20200000546, BCHD I Commercial Planned Unit Development - Agenda Item # 9.B) OBJECTIVE: To approve (adopt) the amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). CONSIDERATIONS: Petition PL20160000221 seeks to add the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict to the Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP); to allow uses permitted by right and conditional use in the Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district and select General Commercial (C-4) uses with a total maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet gross floor area; to add the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict to the GGAMP Future Land Use Map; and, create a new map, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict map, for inclusion in the RGGE map series. Note: A companion PUD rezone petition is scheduled for this same hearing. • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • Collier County Resolution No. 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the Collier County GMP. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held its Transmittal hearing for this petition on August 6 and September 17, 2020. The Board held its Transmittal hearing on October 27, 2020 and approved the petition for transmittal to the DEO by a vote of 510. Commissioner Saunders requested at time of the Adoption hearings the applicant provide "real analysis" for the requested additional 20,000 square feet of commercial uses above the demand analysis of 180,000 square feet identified in the Collier Interactive Growth Model. The petitioner has not provided any additional information subsequent to the Transmittal Board hearing. After review of the Transmitted amendment within each reviewing agency's authorized scope of review, the DEO rendered its Comment Letter indicating "no comment" as did the Florida Wildlife Conservation Commission, South Florida Management District, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The Florida Department of Transportation provided comments not directly correlating to the amendment but general comments regarding connectivity, sidewalks, Complete Streets, etc. The remaining reviewing agencies did not provide a Comment Letter. All review agency Comments Letters received are contained in the back-up materials. Packet Pg. 236 9.A 04/27/2021 • The CCPC held its Adoption hearing on March 18, 2021. The staff and CCPC Adoption Hearing recommendations are presented further below. • This Adoption hearing considers an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Exhibit "A" to the Adoption Ordinance reflects the Board's action at their Transmittal hearing, not the CCPC's recommendation at their Adoption hearing. Staffs analysis of this petition is included in the Transmittal CCPC Staff Report. Two public speakers addressed the CCPC at the Adoption hearing: one speaker waived comments and the other speaker voiced opposition to the adoption of this amendment, specifically addressing safety, aesthetics, and property value concerns related to the proposed stormwater pond on the tract located between 4t' Street NE and Immokalee Road. Based on the review of this large-scale GMP amendment petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions. • The subject ± 19.13-acre site is zoned Estates and designated Estates on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map. • This petition proposes 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses. The subject property, along with much of the surrounding area, allows low density residential development, essential services, parks, recreation, and open space uses. This petition introduces new commercial development, uses and activities to a location where commercial development is not now planned (i.e., not designated to allow commercial zoning). However, the Sub -Element provides for a corridor study within this area, which may result in future amendments to allow commercial and other non-residential uses in the area. • Sites generally located within the market area currently provide more than 1.05 million sq. ft. and 289 acres of commercial use opportunities. Approximately 132 of these commercial acres are undeveloped. • The amount of commercial floor space and the full range of commercial development contemplated by this amendment has not been demonstrated. Staff s analysis, using the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) version 3, found the market area would support 178,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space. • The subject site fronts Immokalee Road (CR 846), a 6-lane divided arterial road, and County water and wastewater service is available to the site. • Generally, there are no issues or concerns regarding levels of service impacts on public infrastructure. Transportation impacts will be mitigated by imposing a trip -cap on the project in the PUD. • Speakers present at the Neighborhood Information Meeting objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4t' Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic. They emphasized the impacts that commercial businesses and traffic would have on their homes, especially where the narrow, westerly portion of the property would be most adversely impacted by traffic and noise. (The petition now only allows access on Immokalee Road.) The data and analysis provided for the amendment generally support the proposed changes to the RGGE Sub -Element of the GGAMP. The complete staff analysis of this petition is provided in the CCPC Packet Pg. 237 9.A 04/27/2021 Transmittal Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: After Adoption, the DEO and other applicable review agencies will have 30 days (from the date DEO determines the Adoption packages are complete) to review the adopted Plan amendment and, should they believe the amendment is not "in compliance," file a challenge [appeal] to the presumed "in compliance" determination with the Florida Division of Administrative hearings. Similarly, any affected party also has 30 days (from the date of Board Adoption) in which to file a challenge. If a timely challenge is not filed by DEO or an affected party, then the amendment will become effective. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." 163.3177(1)(f), FS. In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS provide that plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. Th need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. And the map amendments shall also be based upon the following analyses per Sectionl63.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION C( CPC): That the CCPC forward petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-04 to the Board with a recommendation of approval, based on Board action at Transmittal. Packet Pg. 238 9.A 04/27/2021 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission held their required Adoption public hearing on March 18, 2021. The CCPC recommended that the Board adopt PL20160000221/CP-2018-04, at a maximum intensity of 180,000 square feet of commercial development and limit outdoor sound on the entire parcel to no later than 10:00 p.m. (vote: 6/0). (The sound restriction will be incorporated into the PUD, not in the GMPA.) RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the Ordinance and transmit the adoption petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-04 as approved by the Board at the transmittal hearing to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies, pursuant to Board action at Transmittal. Prepared by: James Sabo, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. OO.Ordinance and Exhibit A (PDF) 2.O1.CCPC Adoption Staff Report(PDF) 3. [Linked] 02.Transmittal Package to DEO Submittal (PDF) 4. 03.NIM Affidavit and Related Documents (PDF) 5.04.Hybrid Virtual Waiver (PDF) 6.05.Sign Posting and Affidavit (PDF) 7. 06.DEO GMPA Comments Letter (PDF) 8. 07YDEP Comment Letter (PDF) 9.08.FDOT Comment Letter (PDF) 10. 09.FWCC Comment Letter (PDF) 11. 10.SFWMD Comment Letter (PDF) 12. legal ad - Agenda ID 15382 (PDF) Packet Pg. 239 9.A 04/27/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Doe ID: 15352 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners amending Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and GGAMP Future Land Use Map and RGGE Map Series, specifically to establish the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict to allow uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the Commercial Intermediate zoning district (C-3), and select uses in the General Commercial (C-4) zoning district, at a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross floor area and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property, comprising approximately 19.13 acres and located on the west side of Immokalee Road, approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. (Adoption Hearing) (Companion to zoning petition CPUD- PL20200000546, BCHD I Commercial Planned Unit Development — Agenda Item # 9.13.) Meeting Date: 04/27/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Sue Faulkner 03/24/2021 5:49 PM Submitted by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Anita Jenkins 03/24/2021 5:49 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Jeanne Marcella Level 1 Reviewer James Sabo Additional Reviewer Anita Jenkins Zoning Director Review Jeanne Marcella Department Head Review Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Dan Rodriguez Level 4 County Manager Review MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending Completed 03/25/2021 9:08 AM Completed 03/31/2021 3:39 PM Completed 03/31/2021 4:12 PM Completed 04/07/2021 2:37 PM Completed 04/12/2021 9:40 AM Completed 04/12/2021 9:43 AM Completed 04/12/2021 9:45 AM Completed 04/15/2021 4:15 PM Completed 04/20/2021 3:49 PM 04/27/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 240 9.A.1 ORDINANCE NO.2021- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT AND SOME GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) USES WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 19.13f ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20160000221] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, BCHD Partners I, LLC, requested an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and the Rural Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Maps and Map Series; and WHEREAS, Collier County transmitted the Growth Management Plan amendments to the Department of Economic Opportunity for preliminary review on November 5, 2020, after public hearings before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners; and [ mokalee Rd Estates s7s/1]16 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. Page 1 of 3 Immokalee Rd Estates /PL20160000221 g g 3/25/21 *** *** *** *** area break in text Packet Pg. 241 9.A.1 WHEREAS, the Department of Economic Opportunity reviewed the amendments to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its comments in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County, has 180 days from receipt of the Comments Report from the Department of Economic Opportunity to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report, the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendments and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on March 18, 2021, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on ; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendments to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Rural Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and Map Series attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. [18-CMP-01005/1607878/1]197 Immokalee Rd Estates /PL20160000221 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. Page 2 of 3 3/25/21 *** *** *** *** are a break in text Packet Pg. 242 9.A.1 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of 2021. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: oft -�2 Heidi Ashton-Cicko 2c Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A - Text and Map Penny Taylor, Chairman [ 18-CMP-01005/ 1607878/ 1 ] 197 Immokalee Rd Estates /PL20160000221 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions. Page 3 of 3 3/25/21 *** *** *** *** area break in text Packet Pg. 243 9.A.1 PL20160000221 /C P2018-04 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: [Page 1] The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** B. ESTATES — COMMERCIAL DISTRICT *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 3. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [Page 9] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** - r Q B. Estates —Commercial District [Page 16] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** x w 3. IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT [Page 26] as c This Subdistrict is approximately 19.13± acres in size and is located on the west side of c Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is 0 to provide a variety of commercial land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: E a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Q Words underlined are added; words FtF Gk thFe gh are deletions Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 244 9.A.1 PL20160000221 /C P2018-04 b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: 1. Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41. 2. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (SIC 4225, air-conditioned mini - and self -storage warehousing only); 3. Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; 4. Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072: 5. Nursing and professional care facilities, SIC 8051, 8052, 8059: The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited to a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross flnnr area_ e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 22), which is the single western parcel immediately abutting 4th Street NE (the "Western Parcel"), shall be utilized for native preservation, stormwater management or buffer areas only. It shall not be utilized for any type of access from 4th St. NE. f. Interconnection shall be provided with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** C. List of Maps [Page 27] *** *** *** *** *** *** *** TEXT BREAK *** *** *** *** *** *** Everglades - Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Words underlined are added; words E;tF Gk thFe gh are deletions Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 245 PL20160000221 /CP2018-04 I ummu� dMW,I—L L I SUBJEU SITE po EXHIBIT A NMMAIF ?I RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP MTOIMm?l Words underlined are added; words FtFYGk thIceugh are deletions R 29 E Page 3 of 4 1 Packet Pg. 246 9.A.1 PL20160000221 /C P2018-04 EXHIBIT A IMMOKALEE ItDAD ESTATES COMMEKOAL SUBD[STRTCT ... ' COLLI EK COURTY. F1,OR1 aA VIM FAD .Grove: (t v SUBJECT' SITE ., Uj a w' rove c ti veL14E 25th 1fE NE 25th AVE N ADOPTED - } cx. XXXX LEGEND � ��wd. fVa. xxxx-x� 0 250 wo 1,000 Feat !7 ' iGLLd� SU"ECT SITE Words underlined are added; words FtF Gk thFe gh are deletions Q Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 247 9.A.2 Co eV C 014 4ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: March 18, 2021 SUBJECT: PROJECT/PETITION PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, LARGE SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Companion to PUD- PL20200000546) [ADOPTION HEARING] ELEMENT: GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT PROPOSED AMENDMENT PETITION PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, The applicant proposes a large-scale Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub -Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, specifically to establish the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict. The Subdistrict will allow uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, and select uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-4, General Commercial zoning district, at a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross floor area. The applicant also proposes to create a new map ("Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict") in the RGGE Sub - Element Map series, which will identify the newly named Subdistrict. The subject property, comprising ±20.00 acres, is located between 4'" Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Note: A companion PUD rezone petition is scheduled for this same hearing. Transmittal hearings on the amendment were held on August 6 and September 17, 2020 (CCPC, Collier County Planning Commission) and on October 27, 2020 (Collier County Board of County Commissioners). The Transmittal recommendations/actions are presented further below. Within CCPC materials provided, you will find the Transmittal Executive Summary from the Board hearing, and the Transmittal CCPC staff report for the petition, which provides staff's detailed analysis of the petition. In accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3)(b)1., F.S., pertaining to the Expedited State Review Process, this Transmittal package was provided to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and other reviewing agencies on November 5, 2020. Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 248 9.A.2 REVIEW AGENCY COMMENT LETTERS After review of the Transmitted amendment within each reviewing agency's authorized scope of review, the DEO, as well as the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/Florida Forest Service, Florida Department of State/Bureau of Historic Preservation, South Florida Water Management District, and Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, rendered their comment letters indicating "no comment" or "no adverse impacts found" or the agency did not respond. The Florida Department of Transportation conducted a planning level analysis and rendered comments within their authorized scope of review but did not express any concerns regarding this project. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission limited comments to advisory information regarding recommendations for reducing conflicts with Florida black bears but did not express concerns with the project. The Comments Letters received are located within materials provided to the CCPC. The remaining reviewing agencies did not provide a Comment Letter. Within CCPC materials provided is an Ordinance with Exhibit "A" text (and map) for the petition; this exhibit reflects the text as approved by the Board for Transmittal. Subsequent to the GMPA transmittal to the DEO, the Ordinance title was revised to reflect the Board's direction to include those uses permitted by right and conditional use in the C-3 Commercial Intermediate zoning district, and select uses permitted by right and conditional use in the C-4 General Commercial zoning district; and, the Exhibit "A" text was revised to limit uses on the westerly portion of the Subdistrict to native preservation, stormwater management, and buffers, and prohibit access from 4th Street NE. TRANSMITTAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To Transmit to DEO. Staff recommended uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, at a maximum intensity of 178,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area; and, restricting access on the westerly portion of site to employees and emergency vehicles only. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DEO (vote: 4/0). The CCPC recommended approval of Subdistrict at a maximum intensity of 180,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area; requested the petitioner provide for vehicular interconnections with properties fronting Immokalee Road to the north and south; eliminate access to 41h St. NE; remove "retail and Office" and replace with "commercial"; and, refine proposed commercial uses. BOARD ACTION: Transmitted to DEO (vote: 5/0). The BCC approved uses permitted by right and conditional use in the C-3 Commercial Intermediate zoning district, and select uses permitted by right and conditional use in the C-4 General Commercial zoning district, at a maximum intensity of 200,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area; and, requirement for vehicular interconnections with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. Additionally, Commissioner Saunders requested at time of the Adoption hearings the applicant provide "real analysis" for the requested additional 20,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses above the demand analysis of 180,000 sq. ft. identified in the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM). The Petitioner has not provided any additional information subsequent to the Board hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ADOPTION): That the CCPC forward the petition to the Board with a recommendation to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and reviewing agencies that provided comments. Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 249 9.A.2 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on March 1, 2021. The criteria for GMP amendments to the GGAMP Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element and Map Series are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2 and 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes. [HFAC] Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 250 9.A.4 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PL20200000546, BCHD I CPUD Rezone (PUDZ) and Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Complianc Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this January 4, 2021 by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician, who is personally known to me. 6A."c-, <;? - Aatn=, - (Signature of 1i6tary Public) MY COMMISSION # GG 982367 Carin J. Dwyer _ _ _ ";r EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 Printed Name of Notary Packet Pg. 251 GradyMinor 9.A.4 Civil Engineers * Land Surveyors • Planners * Landscape Architects NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200000546, BCHD I CPUD Rezone (PUDZ) and Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Noel J. Davies of Quarles & Brady, LLP, representing BCHD Partners I, LLC (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica's Episcopal Church, Parish Hall, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. BCHD Partners I, LLC submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Rezone. The GM amendment proposes to create a new commercial sub -district under the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow up to 200,000 square feet of gross floor area for commercial land uses in the subdistrict. The companion PUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from E, Estates to BCHD I CPUD to allow development of the property with uses permitted by right and conditional use in the C-3, Commercial General Intermediate zoning district and the following limited C-4 uses: Motor freight transportation and warehousing (mini- and self -storage warehousing only, SIC 4225); Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to 5.05.11 of the Land Development Code (LDC); Medical and dental laboratories; and Nursing and professional care facilities; The subject property is comprised of 19.13± acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. 33rd AAVE NE N SUBJECT OilIWell RD Grove DR s p PROPERTY v C co I 4a 40 0 DR x w eCo Murcoti w ml p�ONa m� f a W z z z u~i Ce�a Project Location Map m t- Cn cr yag� C CMQ, " cr y W °ve 3 .ice m° o co 6 25th AVE NE 25th AVE °a NE r Bird1e0 o® P� Randall BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 000515 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Packet Pg. 252 4u8wpu8wy dWJ aoulslpgng lepiewwoo saleasg - peob eale)lowwl ZS£SL) sluawnooa pa;elaa pue;lnepl;;y WIN'£0 7u8wLl3BUV M v in Q N a Y U rc d m ��g�oo�oo�s�oaooWo� �sosmsoo� ��os���m o�W�-oso�^���^�m��WomRo °oosoo&oosom00000.R000000amm.-mmggoo<.o.00R00000s0000m.omo�oRmW0000m0000W00000 mmoo m���MMOmmmm..00..M. .O..MM��MMM�mOmmmMMm��M�M�MM����O w^ ��omM �� MmMM � M MMMmmm <a � oa 5 x O - 0 rc i t U w� < me o wF H 00 ee d dd 3¢ U x� 00 w m¢ xx Oa ru z 00 a z� J ¢O¢ ya z z as W w m N U K h h h COx d ° �R 00 nn O °01 ¢z O a az as 00 On z_z_ 0 0 0 ooQ o�< N 0 �o aO -00 0 0000 0 zz d d d daa h °a I m �� a daa a s a 0re2 d- gQ u Buz 0 aaa u ad�� 0 0 0 mww0 000 a o� $ H', �xx g ��ww w w w rc�� www w o w uww 0 0 rc i x �wa o oyy �I zS m�wa m mm mmm rc-N m z mz -a a www °4 0rcrcw° 5 x mio mo�� o m�� �� mwrcrc w w w FmFx w - Mm 4^ r -room<�� o�'rr -orcrc-mam�� ooM< r� w rcr �rc - rcrc o-F rr ��rc� r��� 02 - rFr r-- �rwrrwwa r 00 Ow O OoOaoOoow oo � aoo 0 ow00000 �ooww owwwowowxx 0 0ooww 06 0 om o'ww mmm ° 0 0o — o�� 0����� o0 00o�0 0"', 0�00� o o Y'R a " Oo aw �, aooaw�aoo �w a�ww rc �rc� �rc �o7w rcrcrcaYamY iLLI tL 1- �� wwtLL� OO tyrc�oa���ww<NLL m oENS St �R ttta�cwm$ RS� moo$ mo m$m �o mSSom$S$m m$ $It$ O O O o mmmm om - �� �m aa z gasoaOy y° yqqy °wiwia¢g tttttt attttwwttww wtwwwwwwtwwttwwtttwtwttt twitwt°ttwwwwt Noauu www w� w Sg°SaU°cwoa°>w;oOoc°zwS�oc°�w;;oz5�c°vi�wowowo5w»5w5w>w55aa5w a 5wacwac�wacvw5wacw5wacvw�c°�w�c°��wzSw a WOOgZSwac°�x¢>wrcowac°�Y5¢>w�c°��wrco O owwaOOwwac°�wwaOc°�zY5¢> z¢>i5¢>zwww°w°Owiaa>wwg ON °°��.°M°°°°°°°°wwwwmmW ��gw��o�oo00oSzwwmw.wwwwwSw--wwZqwZ.w° 0500**000>0>0 aOoc� 9999999 `�'MMMMMM n w ------ ....... LL --------- _------ ---LLwm J.......J n ���� JOJ �aaaaaa �xa �xa �- xa >Wrc JLLxa0=o ow oN���xa � ��**z**wX z **i*******OOOozoz0¢ mzozz����iz�m�z������������mmzzmmzzzzzzmzammzzazzzJxa a � z a n 4 ` H Z z z m m a a M w o a M aaWz > Nw> w o > z > o w o 5 m o 0 0 "� z �33 w w �Mw z w �w w w w zzzN w w 'S w 000> umi umi umi umi umi umi umi O > nnz LL m o f N O N O a wwwmmmm orc hum 33 0000 0xxxxxxx 000000 O i0 o O Z< Z O 4 O a o g °$ o as °= NNNa °a°a°a°a°a°a°a N MN � m§ M M N .Y, u m M ZW and i �a x t E mmmmmmm ¢¢Ix z wwwww LL >' ¢w ¢¢ m H FOFpFU '°UUgUUUUF F UUS 2 rx Fw FFF wwFF F z F w U FF m OF 2 rcwm �200 00000nw 2m. 0w3R g z oww 3w 2 $� ;; a0 w wo>>oi w ww ¢aaaaa¢rc >o �wwwww° wip3rco>o LLx>o� wrcrcrcO�rcrcY 3p w O 'o `°'=Oo wowwoozz rc arc°rcozzzQow x H oa omwwxxrcorco a 2 x>xuua'norcmrc rc� rcJ m� OOOxOwz wmWmNNNZmKKKKKKKwzwOOmm[rzzOQ O>wOxgwwOUwwwOHwwwzOwzzzz30wFZUmpwwz=m¢wwOwOOz (w'J .UO UOQZFzpwwww>�������OrOwO » wrrKrZUm 0U' °OiwzOOO�m00¢ UO O ° wU'_ ¢>Z00 Omm=U'U'UU 63 >FmFZ °°°OxWWWWWWWzmZ>¢xxZmmdxOFwQ CZ > �ZZmv~iFZN�U~i�oZ�g��xWZZmFOm z zzzFFy rcrc�ww�>�s�w000pwOOOOOOO qw O qw oaww000 g2zrcrc �a qqz �a rc �rc�au��oo�rc�wx�3�¢33¢wc��a �x;°¢iiwo �'� oO?�?oio3o0aaQO0ozoOo00 x _ Ooa>oOOz000 �ootN?o<O< woOmmNOOoo<ixY° o??N V m m e Z w z Z x m w y m g w aO= O m a rr O ¢x y ° m m F055 w�u g�Q� orn o o �u > iwg �' wz m0 m wN rn ! �O W. 1000Ub ¢ NO K etl etl gZ mwg ¢¢ Nrm0 ircj 1 w Zdm W ,>„ 0����>0000000kw �Wma rco x� > x O e0� 4w -'tea z wa c �o°oO om� rc z�� w zo m Omusx Zwww 3:rcrcrcrc O.zorcrcxN t�t� xa ¢ xm 3ao¢w�FMOo ° x��my�z°r°nO w 3¢W LL m ro xz� ° ¢zw�zx AE mzxOwwrcia�zzzz wrcrcrcrc 000 o0��z�wrcrc zZa ���zwwx>¢ma'YY x � 50>m �aww gO a ws �3 a rc�mwrc iw°wcwa rcyzs waw>m`� O zz a wm� ti �g O g9 Swz��Sommrc ><30:0 xwmwrc x �oLd zm¢mOaaaaa o xOJ 0ww°V zu5 wm�w¢ Ox �i w a�Uooza¢xLLLLm �awaddi wmwo 'a za �p�arc�wrc x CCCCCCC� U'gOp� WWwm x�WmZ Op= WdU'NCw= a �= s wm w¢r�gm�rc00003JJJJJJJ�ziorc�'"mm--QFwwui c¢io�z°'Om�'�'iFwocgi�0wm� mxxx U1owwoo� a<za 3 y�y ffiffi ¢¢fff arc » ixaauuuuk0000000 �t00000�.zd as w o 2 » hl » >wwdaaaLLawwwwwwo�o�mww� zzzo OO$�i zr a .aaaaaaaamm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm OOOOOOOOO0000000000ww wwwwwwww OOOOxxxxxxxxxN$�ooayyyyyy�� (;uawpuawy dWJ aoulslpgng lepiewwoo saleasg - peob eale)lowwl : ZS£SL) sluawnooa pa;elaa pue;lnepl;;y WIN'£0 7uawLl3BUV o���m���oosoo�goo��s�^�$o��ogo�mmo�o�sg�oom000so���mmoso �,sss�0000�ogm000000��� 0 a a i _ F 0 K O o O o O O O � 2- O ° O aZ a d� d ¢ OW a d� a d a a d as a ow a as a s 3 a w '�r^ 'rc� w w� w 0 r¢Noom w ww o wuw m�orc� $°o w w wwzxrc ww - wrc w w w no w° a 65 SoWoao� ro� oz° z000 oo-0w Waw mmoaz�rc anrcrc mn:O; mU~UU~aU~ YUmmV �Omwm oU Hu o..N V m-O-om... °ww° tw ttwwttww° w °t t tw°wwzwwwt °wttttwwww wttt Mmmr i,» az0000ao��auNNaaioaotN00000azaa=aaa�oonnnon��� w'ww'JJJ w'JwJ'WJ w'ww W zzz� z�� wwW wz zwF ww w 2 -2 wwwwzzw wwwww wmmmmzm grcgrcwwwawaagaarcrcwaawwawagrcgagggawwrcaaaaggggwgaaa a° m u �Wi m c m 5� 3 5 AAA. °°� a o 0 0 o g g g g° g m m m z WU' z Z WU 3-,w i w w i i w w i i WU' W J w o w w O w w w w J J WU w W.3 owwzw0000JJJJwJ000 >o»-9966 0g 0>goo>>0c°�»og>goc°�ggc°�gc°�>o»o»>c°�ggo>c°�c°v 999 0 AA �gn�o�n444nn� op..V;!Nw�o o oo oo�oo �gmmx R RRAA �d� �d R b �� Vim° LLLLLLme $sue d aoQ wm JELL aaa-J wJ LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLdLLLLLLLLLLLL LLdLLN dLLLLLLLL moLLLLLLLLLLLLLLdd LLLLLLJ LL mmmmwwwwwwww wwwk-w-wttta�wwwwwwWw' tw zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zz zzzZzz.zzzzzzmmmxZZZZZ ZZZZL LLZZZaww m z zzzzz ozzzzzzzzzwwwzzz.m rc rc rc rc >o >o >o >o 000 N� 000 O O O $o o m o0o mm ry m ry m 11 a � a a a s ¢ UUU K mKKKU ww w jNKK� OW KKF K K Uz $ �SSSKK t jtttm tt t m8www 3w its 3w3w > sW >w to o o w~ orc > »>$ » > m »> zw »z > > a o> >mmm>> rc orcrcrcm rcrc rc Wrcppp�w w rcrco Jrc3rco o�`OW ww rc oo wo o p wmrcrc r U' K Z U' U' U' W U' U' W W U' K g O O O C> Q J U' U' d W> U' > U' Z W W U' mmm U' U' W C O o Wwwwmzwwzzwo owwwwoo wzww zowOwg owozzwrcrcrcwwz u iw ws000>�o wo oww2zoloww room �UoUoz za>wo R��zzzzzz,.og ti >Yzzzrcmzz >x �¢;mzzo rcz>w o oNzrc�zzzwzzzxxzrc'zzzzwwU�xzz�xQarcwzrc�zz mxxz000zzxao z4 O U' m x ZOO�e OOga00 Oj3�Z v00 omo3030>omomom mmVO1 44o oo, OU m aW J Wwwm mV wz Um ZQ K ry ¢ H ���z NU ° Q Q K z qqg U O Z a w J - g w w H m 0000 Z K o ro w `° i w m U U i ° . a O a ;y o rc rc rc� � � .° 0 � O O O 3 F w W w o aax��wQzo w� ��mQ°o� .1o2 mrcrcrc,� eyzo rrrY m �< ¢ a� w,anQ IH'H.mm¢w JmmWZ zi u3mzw _ ����¢z¢ maw-'3owww wzz'' im UZWO-r� ,-wO�¢oU x3-,.,w WUao°o5 KK �wm000K <'<f� ZJ�y2wYYYKj a9 ww wC Q Z Z w i (� Q K W "� W a a m 0 ui w y tmd ¢ Z O O O D X a a o �'� O_ 3 5 5 W W K 6 a ¢ ° K- a m w Q a J w m O- x p U, ww o� m Ug Ko Q m WO�rZ> UC-o Z O-�gg HHH� WK UUUUU�'m ^m'N rcwo wow- rcomo�<wow rcymc3 rc�q�rcrcrcoyw -¢ass zzzg gw g o0 K---2 6uiOdpjm =2���ui �ui (TWO k Ni=wwW 'C J°Y2j0 » zmwm�o�d66ww wKKmm2000w 2aW�0 FN2UQ66 m2 2���2���'zzz000aaaaaaa�a�arcrcrcrcrcrcrcrcmasimmmmm� » » 333�� oc°v NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION ME0 smog 9.A.4 Petition P1_20200000546, BCHD I CPUD Rezone (PUDZ) an PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Noel J. Davies of Quar .i & Brady, LLP, representing BCHD Partners I, LLC (Applicant) will be he m n Wednesday, January 20, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica's Episcopal Ch Parish Hall, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. Individuals in o would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments sl .R d contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. C y Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, pl E 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. P1 v ;t information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. y m BCHD Partners I, LLC submitted formal applications to Collier Cc seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amend w it and Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Rezone. The P amendment proposes to create a new commercial sub -district undE c e Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow up to 200,000 square feet of 1 � s floor area for commercial land uses in the subdistrict. The compi R n PUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from E, Estates to BC o I CPUD to allow development of the property with uses permitted by E it and conditional use in the C-3, Commercial General Intermediate z1 E g district and the following limited C-4 uses: Motor freight transport n LO and warehousing (mini- and self -storage warehousing only, SIC 4Mr, ); r Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning dis s shall be subject to 5.05.11 of the Land Development Code (LDC); ME _ 11 and dental laboratories; and Nursing and professional care facilities; The subject property is comprised of 19.13± acres, located on the wes• o e of Immokalee Road approximately one-half mile north of Randall Bouli o d in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Flori ZD a-c".a SUBJECT c PRVPERlry _ 4 ti1i94qyM 9 a w Q 2 _• z m c+ri da O C N {� do E s 251h A{fENE 241hAVE WE o a The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for inform Packet Pg. 255 is not a public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING F9.A.4771 Petition PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Rezone and PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict January 20, 2021 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***F�ease be advised*** E The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government E agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a Q d public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. L NAME: k:1ji ! I s 1 T �jQ EMAIL: W'] 1a L < ADDRESS: 7 C7 y�PHONE: Cn L NAME: �� j�1� EMAIL: j�-Q 0 ADDRESS: ZC1 t-L�1n-� < � PHONE: N W NAME: .. � EMAIL: /`i"� a Ia a . Moo ,2 d dr n� ADDRESS: PHONE: Q �0 ' 43V7//B'r' as NAME: EMAIL: 0 E ADDRESS: PHONE: N LO M LO NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: E U 0 0 NAME: EMAIL: m ADDRESS: PHONE: tY c NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: a z NAME: EMAIL: CO) 0 ADDRESS: PHONE: c m E z U NIM Sign -in Sheet 01-20-2021 Packet Pg. 256 9.A.4 BCHD I CPUD January 20, 2021 NIM (PL20200000546) First Name ast Name mail Registration Time pproval Status Anita Jenkins anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov 1/20/202116:29 approved Packet Pg. 257 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript Noel Davies: Good evening, everyone. Thank you for being here this evening. My name is Noel Davies. I am the land use attorney for the subject project that we're for this evening. This is a neighborhood information meeting. We refer to it as a NIM. This is a public information process, that under the county regulations is part of the requirement for the types of development applications that you're going to be hearing about this evening. The time is 5:33. It's January 20, Wednesday, 2021. you have in attendance Wayne Arnold from Grady Minor, who is the professional planner on the project. Sharon Umpenhour with Grady Minor is also here. BCHD Partners One, LLC, which is an affiliate entity of Barron Collier Companies, is the applicant for the subject projects. And Austin Howell is here as the representative from Barron Collier Companies. Nancy Gundlach is also — hi, Nancy — from the county and is available to answer any of your questions as well, as am I and the whole team. and Anita Jenkins is attending from the county as well via Zoom. So, this meeting is being — is being projected onto Zoom and all COVID guidelines are being — being followed. I have removed my mask with your all's consent and am standing very far away from you so I can talk into this microphone as well. So, for the record, we are here this evening for Petition PL20200000546, which is BCHD I CPUD — I'll get to the meaning of PUD shortly — and Petition PL20160000221, the Immokalee Road Estates commercial subdistrict, which is the GMPA application — growth management plan amendment application. I'm happy to take specific questions about that as well. The other members of our team are also available in the event that you have any specific questions relating to their respective areas of expertise. They are not here today, but, happy to provide their contact information to you all and let them answer some of your specific questions. That includes Norm Trebilcock, who is our traffic engineer, from Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, Bruce Layman, our ecologist from Peninsula Engineering, as well as Russ Weyer, an economist with Real Estate Econometrics. So, I'm showing you now on the screen the location map of the subject property. You'll see, the assemblage, four different parcels. We are located on the western side of Immokalee Road as Immokalee turns just north of the curve to the north at Randall Boulevard. and — Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 258 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript Sharon Umpenhour: It has a pointer. Noel Davies: Yes. So, with the pointer — Sharon Umpenhour: I don't think it'll work on the TV. Noel Davies: It doesn't really show on the screen. Wayne Arnold: Um, well, if I may [grabs pointer] — Noel Davies: Oh, wonderful. [Crosstalk] Noel Davies: Thank you, sir. This is Immokalee Road going east. That's Randall Boulevard here that I'm pointing to. and then the road curves to the north as you all are — all probably familiar with. Right about 4th Street Northeast. As you continue north there is a residential development to your east, which is the Orange Tree residential neighborhood, and at that signalized intersection, the subject property is directly to the west, across the street from there. And there are three — excuse me, four parcels, which will be assembled together by my client. and those parcels IDs are there. If you have specific questions for me or any of the members of our team with respect to the parcel IDs or location, please let us know. So, the next slide details the current zoning of the property, which is E — Estates. The proposed zoning of the property, which is the subject of our PUD application, CPUD, which stands for commercial planned unit development, which is a zoning category — a site plan zoning category. And we are seeking to amend the zoning to amend the current estates zoning to this newly created planned unit development. There is also a future land use category, which the existing future land use category went into the county's comprehensive growth management plan, is the estates designation, mixed use district, residential subdistrict. I know that's a mouthful. If you have questions about the specifics of that, please let me know. And as part of our accompanying GMPA application, which we did have our hearings for with respect to the transmittal portion of that, and it has been transmitted to the state — the proposed future land use is estates designation, mixed use district, Immokalee Road Estates commercial subdistrict, which is the proposed subdistrict Page 2 of 14 Packet Pg. 259 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript being created as part of this development application process. the total acreage of those four parcels in the assemblage that I mentioned is 19.13 acres. So, the growth management, and planned unit development application — and I'm going to refer to these as the GMPA application and the PUD application — these are simultaneous, contemporaneous applications. One deals with the land use category. The other deals with the zoning. And they often move through the process with the county, together, but there are different parts for each. And Nancy or Anita, I'm hoping, can also answer additional questions with respect to the county process on that. Growth management — growth management planning amendment to create a new subdistrict — this is what we're proposing — to allow commercial land uses. As I mentioned, transmittal hearings, which were held at, on September 17th in front of the Collier County Planning Commission and October 27, 2020 for the Board of County Commissioners, at those hearings, we did receive unanimous approval to transmit the subject application, that GMPA application, to the state. that comes back down from the state and adoption hearings are scheduled for both the GMPA application as well as the PUD rezone. This neighborhood information meeting is part of that adoption or pre -adoption hearing process. The rezone application is from the Estate's zoned district to CPUD, as I mentioned, and the specifics of that, which would allow the total of two hundred — excuse me, 200,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area, to include the following: all permitted and conditional uses in the C I through C3 zoning districts of the Collier County Land Development Code, as well as car washes, medical and dental laboratories, motor freight transportation and warehousing, which is an indoor, air-conditioned, self -storage use, as well as nursing and professional care facilities. This is the proposed subdistrict language which memorializes what I just walked through. And if there are some questions on this, please don't hesitate to ask. These are the proposed CPUD permitted uses. I just walked through these. You can see them in a little larger front there. Again, any questions, let us know. And these are specific uses that our client has agreed to prohibit. For the purpose of clarification and in the abundance of — of caution involved in this, these following uses are prohibited: employment agencies, health supply services, labor pools, manpower pools, homeless shelter, soup kitchen, psychiatric hospital, specialty Page 3 of 14 Packet Pg. 260 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript hospitals, individual and family social services. And there are a number of details with respect to that. Again, if you have questions on that, please let us know. This is all part of our development application file with the county. These are specific uses that we've carved out to prohibit. And this is the proposed master plan. if you have specific questions on this, I'm happy to answer them. And Wayne Arnold, again with Grady Minor, is here to, answer your questions. Can we [inaudible] [00:08:50]? Wayne Arnold: So, you'll recall that we had a four -parcel assemblage. Three of the parcels abut Immokalee Road, and then we have what we call the finger parcel, which is what's indicated here, water management. and that parcel, abuts just slightly — it shows that this is approximately 180 feet on 4th Street Northeast. and to be clear, that particular parcel is going to be reserved for water management purposes, open space, buffering. There's not going to be physical construction of structures on that parcel. And that's — that's something that, my client has agreed to, as part of this process. You can see the access here at Orange Tree Boulevard. There's, a natural preserve to the north portion of the property, and then other buffers, and details with respect to the site development regulations, which are in accordance with the PUD regulations in the county codes and have been reviewed by county staff. Noel Davies: Thank you, Wayne. So, one other item on this is the interconnections with property to the north and property to the south. and you'll note on this site plan that there is an indication for vehicular and pedestrian interconnection. That's at the south boundary line of the subject property to our neighbor to the south, so there will be interconnection there, as well as a note for vehicular -pedestrian interconnection at the north end of our property, where — where there will be an interconnection with our neighbor to the north. Anything else on the site map? Yes, sir. If I may, I'm just close to finishing the PowerPoint and then take questions. Okay. So, this is a list of the proposed development standards for the PUD application. I'm happy to walk through any of these, with you all. Proposed deviations. We're requesting relief from Section 5.06.04(f)(3), directory signs. We're also requesting, in deviation two, relief from LDC Section 6.06.01, street system requirements, and Appendix B, typical street sections and right of way design Page 4 of 14 Packet Pg. 261 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript standards. These are our deviations, and any questions related to those I'll direct specifically to Mr. Arnold. In conclusion — and I do want to get to your questions — documents and information can be found online, gradyminor.com — Wayne's company — slash planning. And I believe that there are business cards, for Ms. Umpenhour at the front. So, any additional questions can be directed towards Sharon and our team will get you an answer. also, on Collier County Growth Management Public Portal. The website for that is there. Next steps. So, hearing signs will be posted on the property advertising the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners hearing dates. Those are to be determined. This is one step in moving forward through that process. So, those hearing signs will be posted on the subject property. And again, contact information for Sharon as well as for Nancy and Corby, who is not here today. But Anita Jenkins from the county is also on Zoom and her contact information is available on the county website. And I'm sure Nancy, or one of us will get back to you as well. So, with that, thank you all again for coming and I will open it to questions. Yes, sir? Jerry Moon: On the car wash — Noel Davies: And, sir, if I may, if you could just — just because we're recording this — if you could state your name for the record and your address. Jerry Moon: My name is Jerry Moon, and my address is 2950 4th Street Northeast. Noel Davies: Yes, sir. Jerry Moon: The car wash. How are you guys going to be, plan on getting water there? Does the county, run water lines out there? [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: Yeah, sure. This is Wayne Arnold. And there is water and sewer service availability in Immokalee Road that we'll be tapping into for this project. The county operates and took over the Orange Tree utility and they're going to be expanding that operation and increase capacity for us for both water and sewer here. Jerry Moon: What about the runoff from the car wash? I mean, I just put in a Page 5 of 14 Packet Pg. 262 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript brand new well two years ago and you guys are going to be almost neighbors. The runoff from the car wash. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. The water for most of these new car washes — and Austin may have more information on this — but it does require recycle — recycling of their water. It'll also then get treated and discharged into our sewage system, so it's not like we just discharge it offsite. The water is treated and collected as far as the sewer system. Jerry Moon: Okay. Noel Davies: Thank you, Wayne. Other questions? Yes, sir. John Pelletier: Yeah. John Pelletier. I live at 2961 4th Street Northeast, right across —just across there. Noel Davies: Yes, sir. John Pelletier: So, the thing that caught my eye was the — in the letter — was, motor freight transportation. Noel Davies: Yes. John Pelletier: Can you elaborate on what that is? Noel Davies: Yes, sir. That's the County's term for self -storage facilities that you've seen around town. So it's an indoor, air-conditioned, self - storage facility. Wayne, would you like to add to that? Wayne Arnold: You've probably seen Cube Smart, or lockup storage? John Pelletier: Yeah. Wayne Arnold: Those are the types of uses — John Pelletier: That description is — didn't seem like it would match, storage units. motor freight transportation, it just — Wayne Arnold: That's — that's why — John Pelletier: To me, it sounds like tractor trailers. Wayne Arnold: Well, just to elaborate, the County requires us to put everything we can in. So, it's called the Standard Industrial Classification Manual that the federal government publishes. Page 6 of 14 Packet Pg. 263 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 John Pelletier: Okay. Wayne Arnold: So, that's the category that self -storage is under. And we further restricted us to having air-conditioned indoor self -storage, so it doesn't allow for the outdoor storage lot or just general warehouse - type storage. It has to be an indoor self -storage facility. John Pelletier: Okay. And, C 1 to C3 is what the proposal was? Noel Davies: Yes. John Pelletier: Oh, yeah, C1 to C3. it — was I wrong? Was C4 on the letter? Or is there a C4? Austin Howell: There is a C — this is Austin Howell with Barron Collier. There's a C4 and C5 zoning. John Pelletier: Okay. Austin Howell: We had selected additional uses from C4. We didn't want all of the C — we didn't want all of the C4 uses. It felt — it was a little much. So, we had specifics that we selected from that list after identifying information. Wayne Arnold: And this is Wayne Arnold again, I would just add that when we started this process, and some of you may have come to the transmittal neighborhood information meeting, we asked for C 1 through C4. And as we went through the process between staff and planning commission, they asked us to limit the C4 uses further. So, we left this with what? Four — four C4-type uses. The rest of them are C 1 through C3 uses, which you find commonly in your neighborhood centers throughout Golden Gate Estates. John Pelletier: Okay. And the C4 uses aren't specified there? Noel Davies: Those — those are the C4 uses, sir. It says C 1 through C3, and then the original request was for all C4 uses, and that's been pared down to just those specific four uses there from the C4 category. John Pelletier: Okay. Noel Davies: So, no other uses in the C4 category are are permitted. John Pelletier: Aren't permitted. Okay. Noel Davies: Okay? Page 7 of 14 Packet Pg. 264 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript John Pelletier: Well, just for the record, the motor freight transportation is — I know — to me, that sounds like we're back to a bus depot again. Noel Davies: Yeah. And so — no, I — John Pelletier: That — that wording right there is awful. Noel Davies: If I can make one other point of clarification, and this is sort of an idiosyncrasy in the way that the Collier County Land Development Code has — has developed, but motor freight transportation and warehousing is broader than self -storage. In the parenthetical which Wayne was referencing, that SIC code, which is a planning terminology for use codes, we're limiting ourselves specifically — and this is based on, you know, the county definition of these terms — to 4225, which is the SIC code for air- conditioned mini and self -storage warehousing only. So, that is what the limitation is. Anything beyond self -storage or air-conditioned self -storage is not permitted and is not being proposed. John Pelletier: Okay. Well, again, for the record, I don't want that. But it's up, you know, to other people to decide that. The other stuff is fine with me. The other question I had — unless did you want to? The little, finger parcel. Noel Davies: Yes. John Pelletier: We were talking about that. does that really need to be changed to commercial to put water on it? Noel Davies: It does. John Pelletier: Does it? Noel Davies: So, it's all — it goes through the process as part of that assemblage. That's why I explained that piece of it. At that point, it all goes as a — as a group of parcels together. That's — that's part of the development application process. John Pelletier: Throwing water from a commercial property to a residential property wouldn't be feasible. Is — that's what I was getting at. You can't not change that piece because that's where all the water's going and it's part of the project. Was that always the intent to put that water on that property? Page 8 of 14 Packet Pg. 265 9.A.4 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript Wayne Arnold: It has been since the inception of this property. Yes. It's gonna serve multiple purposes, as Noel said. It's going to serve offering general open space and water management — Wayne Arnold: Water treatment. Austin Howell: Yeah. Lindzy Frost: Water treatment? Wayne Arnold: The treatment of — our service water has to be treated before it can be discharged anywhere off the site. Yes, ma'am. Phyllis Litka: Phyllis Litka, 2940 2nd Street Northeast. So, where that — is that going to be a lake? Or is that going to — I forget how they — they word that. Noel Davies: Do you know that? Austin Howell: No. Wayne Arnold: I don't know if we know for sure whether that's going to be a lake or a dry retention system yet. Phyllis Litka: Oh, that's what — yeah. Okay. Wayne Arnold: And so the water management is the general term for whether it's a lake or dry retention. Some projects have both. that parcel is about 180-feet wide, so it's wide enough to have a lake. We just don't know if we're going to be digging it as a lake yet or designing it as a dry retention system. Phyllis Litka: Which would be, like, going east on Immokalee, right before Wilson, that big, huge parcel? Wayne Arnold: Mm-hmm. Phyllis Litka: Is — is that what it would like if it — Wayne Arnold: Yes. Yes. And right now — right at the corner of 4th Street and Immokalee Road, the county has a large dry retention system and it functions to take in stormwater during heavy rain events. It filters into the ground where it ultimately discharges over a structure. But it's the same concept. And like I said, I don't think we know quite yet if it's gonna be designed to be dry or wet. Page 9 of 14 Packet Pg. 266 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 Phyllis Litka: Okay. Noel Davies: Other questions? Good questions. Yes, ma'am. Lindzy Frost: Lindzy Frost, 2950 4th Street. what are you — how is the noise level gonna be? You're gonna be cutting down all these trees and Immokalee Road is always already noisy. So, it's gonna make for a neighborhood with a lot more noise and with less trees. Noel Davies: You want to speak on that? Wayne Arnold: I can. Sure. This is Wayne again. The — I think we've asked for several uses, and Nancy, you can chime in, but certain uses the county is going to ask us to limit hours that operate. Any type of outdoor music to be played for any use, whether it's, you know, a restaurant that wants to have piped in outdoor music or something, they're going to probably ask us to limit those hours. They're probably gonna ask us to orient certain uses away from 4th Street and toward Immokalee Road. They'll have — some of our uses may have hours of restriction on them so that they're not open late into the night. We'll have lighting standards to make sure there's no light pollution into your neighborhood. So, those are pretty common things that we deal with on all of these projects. the noise is something that — whether it's going to be for single-family houses that clear the lot or it's gonna be a commercial operation, I mean, the trees are largely gonna be gone. But you can notice from that exhibit, there is a large portion of the site that's going to be a preserve on the north portion of the site. And that's a function of required native vegetation that we have, so we do have to retain some native and, obviously, we're gonna have buffers and — and newly planted vegetation as well. John Pelletier: John Pelletier again. Noel Davies: Yes, sir. John Pelletier: The buffer on the 4th Street Northeast, is that 40-foot or a 20-foot buffer? Noel Davies: Yeah. so, there's a 20-foot buffer indicated on the proposed master plan. That is 180-feet wide and, approximately how — how wide is that parcel length. The point of that piece is for all that to — to serve as some sort of buffering, open space purpose. Austin Howell: Yeah. Page 10 of 14 Packet Pg. 267 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 Noel Davies: There's not going to be, as I mentioned, physical construction of structures on that — on that parcel. John Pelletier: Yeah, yeah, yeah. I understand. and is there any native vegetation that's gonna stay there? Noel Davies: So the preservation and the native vegetation is going to be in the — I can't — I'm trying to point to it before. There's an area there marked "preserve" on the — on the north side. John Pelletier: Oh, yeah, no. I was talking about that strip that — that comes — the finger strip off of — Austin Howell: That — that would be cleared for that either open space or — or water management. John Pelletier: Type D. What is that? Is that a berm — Wayne Arnold: Technically, a buffer. It's the standard buffer that's required to be constructed along the right of way. So, it's probably going to be trees in that location. The county has a requirement — the reason that it's not called out as preserve, even if we retain some of the native vegetation, all preserve areas on a PUD have to be contiguous on site where you have that vegetation and the county and the ecologists have looked at that and determined that that's the best place for our preserve because there's presence of some wetland communities in that part of the site. So, that's why it's showing as preserve. John Pelletier: Okay. And — okay. So, yeah. And it's just — I'm just getting back to that buffer right on 4th Street, the tip of that water management. is that going to be planted — 10-foot or 15-foot plants? Or what — what are they — what's this Type D? Do they have to go in at a certain height? Noel Davies: Are you referring, sir, to the Type D buffer there that — John Pelletier: Yeah. Noel Davies: — that Mr. Arnold was — was referencing? John Pelletier: On the finger, right at — right at the — where it crosses or hits 4th Street Northeast. It's a little rectangle. Wayne Arnold: So, Nancy's got an answer for you. Page 11 of 14 Packet Pg. 268 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 John Pelletier: Wayne Arnold Noel Davies Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: Okay. We'll let her respond — Yeah, Nancy. A Type D buffer — I'm a landscape architect, too. Okay. It's, trees are 10-feet tall at planting and they're 30 feet on center. Okay. Any veg material underneath? Any what? Veg material. If it's adjacent to a parking lot, yes. If it's not adjacent to a parking lot, then no. John Pelletier: Okay. So — Nancy Gundlach: And it would be a double row edge, 24 inches tall. John Pelletier: We'll right straight through it. If it's just the tree every 30 foot and then nothing underneath? Nancy Gundlach: Correct. John Pelletier: Okay. So, we will see straight into that. Nancy Gundlach: Well, are you talking about from 4th Street where that water body — well, where this detention is? John Pelletier: Yeah. Yeah. I — I, honestly, you know — and even in the neighborhood, I know the neighbors on either side aren't here — Nancy Gundlach: Okay. John Pelletier: But, just as — you know, as much buffering as possible even at the eye level would be nice. With the cocoplum or something like that. Nancy Gundlach: We have a sample strip that's — [Crosstalk] Page 12 of 14 Packet Pg. 269 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 Nancy Gundlach: Can you do a C buffer like you did on the other one? Wayne Arnold: We'll certainly [Crosstalk] Wayne Arnold: We'll talk about that again. Consider what kind of additional buffer we might be able to provide there. John Pelletier: Yeah. Nancy Gundlach: Yeah, I just — John Pelletier: Just as — as a note, you know, trees are to be 30-foot, too high. I'd do that, too, but I'm sure we'd like to have something — Nancy Gundlach: Yeah, just, for the record — for the recording — we're talking about trying to do some buffering just at that little corner there in the, what's exposed to, 4th Street. An additional 15-foot wide Type B buffer. Wayne Arnold: And I think that, obviously, we'll certainly consider enhancing that buffer. Nancy Gundlach: Yeah. Similar to the one we did to the south. Just where that little rear portion of the shopping center is exposed. John Pelletier: And then on either side? Just, again, I — I can't speak for those neighbors, but is there, like, a certain spot you have to stop and not put the water retention? Is there — what do they call it? Easement? Nancy Gundlach: Well, why — it's John, right? John Pelletier: Yes. Nancy Gundlach: John, what I was suggesting to the is putting the buffer at the rear of where the shopping center would be, so it would be more, away from 4th Street. So, at 4th Street, you're looking in and you're just seeing either dry retention or a lake. And then once you hit the buildings, what I had suggested was a Type B buffer, which is trees 25 feet on center and a 6-foot tall hedge. So, that, your view — John Pelletier: Around the C? Is that what you're saying? The corner of the C there? Nancy Gundlach: Yes. Yes. Page 13 of 14 Packet Pg. 270 PL20200000546 BCHD I CPUD Jan 20, 2021 NIM Transcript 9.A.4 John Pelletier: Okay. Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: John Pelletier: Nancy Gundlach: Noel Davies: John Pelletier: Got it. Cool. Yeah. I guess that would be a better effective — Yeah, just a — — thing. That would Yeah, that water retention doesn't bother me. Yeah. That way you can enjoy the view of the — the water body. And we appreciate that, and certainly, we will discuss with the client. And does this have to be square like that or can it undulate to give it more of a lake look? Just that's — Austin Howell: That was discussed with Barron Collier. We did meet with, John Themel this morning. I did. So, he's on the north side of where that water area you're talking to is, and that was something that came — that came out of that meeting this morning. We're gonna take a look and see if we can maybe shape it. We don't know if it can be done yet, but we are gonna have our engineers just run their counts on the stormwater and see if it — see if it can be done as well. John Pelletier: Yeah, yeah. If you can go deeper and just massage the edges to make it more natural. Other than that. Well, that's about all I have. Noel Davies: Thank you. Other questions? John Pelletier: Thanks, guys. Noel Davies: Okay. Thanks, everyone, for coming. Again, the best way to reach us is through Sharon. Her business cards are — are at the front. If you don't have one, please grab one. And I think that — in fact, I wonder if Nancy can give you her business card as well. Thank you. Thank you all for coming and, have a nice evening. [End of Audio] Duration: 29 minutes Page 14 of 14 Packet Pg. 271 7-0 0 CL V V cm •o qq U) O O O O O N 0 N J CL W CL sa;e}s3 - peob 9ale3lowwl : ZS£SO s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;lnep!IIV WIN -CO :;u8wLl3el4V H W 1 0 w N N O O O O %0 O N J a. CL V H D cn V i E 0 V _ 0 0 a E 0 0 0 s 0 t Z 0 N O N i _ sa4e;s3 - peob ealelowwl : ZS£S6) s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;!nep!IIV WIN'£0 :;u9wy3eUV I I• J i 0) .b) W C) V) .C: Q) OL O O W }C V E a J L m 7a. sa;e}s3 - peob 9ale3lowwl : ZS£SO s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;lnep!IIV WIN -CO :;u8wLl3el4V i W O '_ V N 4� } O V Q Q) U cn Q "' 0 W O Q Q -+- � O O v) O W 4) -F— O � X U � x C�' Ln O JQ O W O �., W _ O O E ci� 0 w 0 E O V H � V � � m � � o > > N } 1L o o � W CO. o� N O CL O L CL sa;e}s3 - peob 9ale3lowwl : ZS£SO s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;lnep!IIV WIN -CO :;u8wLl3el4V ZZ Q) O U -0 U _0 S•o O� E Q) 4- L O0- -0 -0i Q) Q) _ O > - o _O o p — m � p O O O N CN — i O i 0 Q) O M U O E O L O N — Q) N co CN O O U - U O Q N LO N E N N,00 0 O i O LO U� �0 U O O � � U Q) Umu o� �� �� Q) O 3 N O U Q) �„ U O - O Q) -� cn O �U N �o O � °>,o o o o o 0 p o C) O N N 0 0 — c- Uj > `' W U Q) cn `c O Uj O -Z) > V C- Q)Q) O O Q) � � N Q Q) -A- . - � _0 L- Q) "' `� Uj Q) Q) O oQUU�� �Z ) O O . i Q) E F O _O O -Q V) Q) Q) U O Q) Q) E Q O E CZ- O sa4e;s3 - peob ealelowwl : ZS£S6) s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;!nep!IIV WIN'£0 :;u9wy3eUV 4� O CL O a m rt sa;e}s3 — peob 9ale3lowwl ZS£SO s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;lnep!IIV WIN -CO :;u8wLj3el4V 00 Q � N T a1 U O CD _O " N. � O — a 0 Q � U � O U O I0 ol U N o U N 00 0)CN N O � O y 0 00 � UU 0 0 0 Q 00 ) ° co ° 4) O "' •� 4) O L > 'i O C)o ° �� a� CL o� o ° 0 Q a) � OU � `V) V Q) U �O °Lo o 0 O •Q) Ln O � O O � •U O 0 �- '- �. Q0 U �� z s8;e}s3 — peob 9ale3lowwl ZS£SO s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;lnep!IIV WIN -CO :4u8wLj3e}4Vy v °1 N Q) O _ O CD Y E 4- Q) Q Q) Q) Q) Q) O C -� Q) Q) Q) U O U o O Q) U U � coQ) O U O M � � Q) Q °� vi Q) O Q Q) O � U ° z z = N E Q) O Q)U Q O � Q) 3 Ln U Q)O> O OO Q Q) Q) Q) 0 O O O — ° i O Q) Q OD U = Q Q) Q) i 0 Q) O O O Q) Li Ln U U O O � N vi Q i C- O E -� O Q _ .E >L.Q vi O Q) o X O O- QLn H QU) O Q) ° >. w O ' Q) E o NGO N ° _ Q) Q) 0 Q) Q � -� Q Q) O Q) Q) � Q) i Q) ° Q Q Q) U Q) `�' ' V) ° •� 4) V) W = Q) C I O i' O S I I I U I U U M Q M 0, L5 Q) N ') OQ _ 00 � Q U O Q) se4e;s3 - peoa eele)lowwl : Z5£B4) s;uewnoo(3 pa;elab pue;lnepl}}y WIN•£0 4uawype4v v Q T X z Z a W U' W Q U U U W M* *Ua** U1NN +I u'1 LL Q r OD N7M 0 y W (� a 30 2K O C i � .r.. �K Q* Q aiUul W w xg p p Y W> a W ICg NujF� U a W W W W NOF�a aa w E y �UaM i z tta O 0 a Ix L) o a a'�d try N„ �jOZV Cary OMLu C7 II CL wwa Ed�wU'Oi WQry w t/ia ualNppyy Uz ocn Q�a?,� w JQ (� dym V w `'go wgC4 IMMOKALEE ROAD wW w a Ww w COuj Oa UOZw 2w QJw O d N L)i f a w Z .g.'.'.'.'....... 0 IL Z I �� U)w 5 w'w'"'.'.' oL o I_ 9 w� F ',b o[i'W. 'LLLWo� w� y a m w wz I w a w o awa Li Z o 'i' . f; I I m O S H I \\r ��T\�` II z � II \\� C I L Ww z LL I �`` L.L. F 7 a0� _I II wN O wm\ m 2 O� W Lu m ' 3o ws\ N wLy ��\ II w wURI a III J 3o I a Ri 180, 5 W 4TH STREET N.E. Z Q � --- w o0 CA ma � � � � � � � s ms -p o _m)iomm:z GL) nmmn o p mGH pew p@¥ mN G:memu38,¥, � a D / a & a & 9 Lu << t\ _- a \ a 6 z a< + z $ $ 3 & 3 \ 3 % \ 5 ° \ k CA - LLJ r§a / \ } : § 3 E E/ § \ a a a a aa a as- z a o oq Le) o o g o00 2 2 2m 0 � z NR # _ C44 � _« {� ( / �k ° 2 « = co � . \ \ §\kA-k3 §, § cc e'o e a 0 ƒ � � E $ u § § § } k) 0 2 ƒ •/ 2 ° § § 0 2 0 f E} E� L /\ » L E E E E� 2 [ # a � Z � e% ©\ > p � F / / / f ■ 2 ± 7 } } § ■ z LU z z_ -j z_ & < / ■ ■ bio $ e 2 / K / \ o / k&§e 0 2°22 8 0 % .$«/S?2 ± \ k b 0 2 o M.® 2 § \ \ . c m o e a ° ± - -0 • eu`- ° / 2 : / §) \ % 2 e . § \ \ �0 E .��o R/ �t �§ ;-0o 2 c(D >a 0 ;ia \ ®e � § 2 E / / \ k 0 •E C e B t � �I�IaS $ 77 �76 e § £•� z 0 /]�ƒ/�7� % a Z } L § 7 2 \ k \ e w m / ; z k } a I se4e;s3 - peoa eele)lowwl : Z5£B4) s;uewnood pa;elab pue;lnepl}}y WIN'£0 4uaw43e44y CN v 000 Q N T a1 a z Y U l0 a F r- QJ Q � 'j Ln Ln - E k E c -C W V Ln " aj 3 L � ] 0 Cr QJ4-1 CL E c 4-j m " � 0 qa }' ❑- aj t, � m ur� � �-C q 0 Q w c � � � ° a +� _ m c a 4- {° c G r-L L S m 2 � E r tn- MINO c cu c > :cu 0 jL rL- 4>- 0 O 1 r_ LL:L w m Ii ai � aj H CL � L x M° CX)M Lr),} a r, 0 0 � q� C: • } `� rLn m EONE cu ' L cu j Q 4- ai CL � CL m E aj L kA r _ i4 N 0 0_ U 0 c� � i a sa4e;s3 - peob ealelowwl ZS£S6) s;uawnooa pa;elab pue;!nep!IIV WIN'£0 :;u9wy3eUv v oMo Q > N O oO a CY w d _ Y a O � MO O U Q) O U � O U Q) U Q) O U U U Q) SQ o, U O O N U 4-(� � '� � "? p c O > L.U QO 0 Q) ) O O Q) -� N '— -+- U _ Q) - Q) O C Q O >� Opt U > O U i N CCCL O Q) Q O Q U O E Q 0 U �U O O O Co a 0 U O Q) ON E O ° Q- Uco O N O O E U -� E m 0 O N O" L i C E I m = z N O N O •� O �U U O 5QMN y E U 0)>` vU U�N�M -a _� � Um a Q) �� OC�N O O O U� E o i oo Coder County 9.A.5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.xov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver For Petition Number(s): Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners PL20160000221 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), BCHD Partners I, LLC (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Noel J. Davies, Esq. �f Signature' ❑ Applicant 0 Legal Counsel to Applicant �1' zo zd Date: * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 284 9.A.6 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel f< r a minimum of fil teen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) inusl be ma intaincd by the petitiraner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for Fig ns. however these guidelines should not be construed tea supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specitic sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter SE. The sign(s) in ust be erected in full view of the public. not more than Iive (5) tier from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely attired by nails. staples. or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened secured y to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a linal decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed. lost, or i endured unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA 0€9UNTY €)F COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHAR€3N UMPENHOUR WH€J ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL C€JVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) PL20160000221/CP-2018-4 Immokalee _Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict and PL20200000540 BCHD I CPUD Rezone (PUDZ)_ .1 IJ' iLX/ V W 1 LZ 3800 Via Del Rcy SIGNAT R F APPLICANTOR AGENT/ STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Uirpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Gradv Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee Bonita Springs. Florida 34 1 10 CITY. STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 25 day of February , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Plannin • Technician for O Grade Minord Associates. P A, personally known tome a+-+v)+e- and who 8+4/did not take an oath. '"Y►g CARIN J. DWYER uY couuissio>i 4 sc s8z3s7 MPIRES: Uay 14, 2024 WdW ThI. Notary PuNiC UWerwfts My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Signature of Notar#iRbblic Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 285 `41 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE' IMMd"I,I ROAOESIASEfi COMMERCIAL SRECISiAMr NO P MANRO IIEllD221/ PLAN 9-4A11110111 ECHO PErInOI, RC PUEIs000C1m�cv =9I6 4 a fiFxo I cvuC PFlOnF PETITION RO_ PL 203900996A6 s. CCPC. MARCH 13 . 2031 - 9,00 a a APPIL 21. 21121 , 1) AO IT dORRTA 1-11 -ENT CEMFER SRO FLOOR Y IS99 f A6l AMIaM1 IRAIL. MAPLES. R SA1 {+.� S:4-1S1545d1I➢ryCy LCR9[ACx, ucP itV =`iS-e j �� room--- 9.A.7 Ron DeSantis GOVERNOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY December 7, 2020 The Honorable Burt L. Saunders Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Saunders: Dane Eagle EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The Department of Economic Opportunity ("Department") has reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Collier County (Amendment No. 20-04ESR) received on November 9, 2020. The review was completed under the expedited state review process. We have no comment on the proposed amendment. The County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, we have enclosed the procedures for adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment. In addition, the County is reminded that: • Section 163.3184(3)(b), F.S., authorizes other reviewing agencies to provide comments directly to the County. If the County receives reviewing agency comments and they are not resolved, these comments could form the basis for a challenge to the amendment after adoption. • The second public hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or more comprehensive plan amendments, must be held within 180 days of your receipt of agency comments or the amendment shall be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the Department and any affected party that provided comment on the amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(c)1., F.S. • The adopted amendment must be rendered to the Department. Under Section 163.3184(3)(c)2. and 4., F.S., the amendment effective date is 31 days after the Department notifies the County that the amendment package is complete or, if challenged, until it is found to be in compliance by the Department or the Administration Commission. Florida Department of Economic Opportunity I Caldwell Building 1 107 E. Madison Street I Tallahassee, FL 32399 850.245.7105 1 www.FloridaJobs.ora www.twitter.com/FLDEO lwww.facebook.com/FLDEO An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and service are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. All voice telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTY/TTD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at 711. Packet Pg. 287 9.A.7 The Honorable Burt L. Saunders, Chairman December 7, 2020 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact Scott Rogers, Planning Analyst, by telephone at (850) 717-8510 or by email at scott.rogers@deo.myflorida.com. Sincerely, F' r ames D. Stansbury, Chief Bureau of Community Planning and Growth J DS/sr Enclosures): Procedures for Adoption cc: Thaddeus L. Cohen, Department Head, Collier County Growth Management Department Margaret Wuerstle, Executive Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Packet Pg. 288 9.A.8 From: Plan Review To: anita.ienkins(cicolliercountvfl.aov; DCPexternalagencycomments Cc: Plan Review Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Collier County 20-04ESR Proposed Date: Thursday, December 3, 2020 2:38:17 PM Attachments: image001.ona To: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Interim Division Director Re: Collier County 20-04ESR — Expedited State Review of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) has reviewed the above -referenced amendment package under the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The Department conducted a detailed review that focused on potential adverse impacts to important state resources and facilities, specifically: air and water pollution; wetlands and other surface waters of the state; federal and state-owned lands and interest in lands, including state parks, greenways and trails, conservation easements; solid waste; and water and wastewater treatment. Based on our review of the submitted amendment package, the Department has found no provision that, if adopted, would result in adverse impacts to important state resources subject to the Department's jurisdiction. Please submit all future amendments by email to Plan. Reviewic'�i FloridaDEP.gov. If your submittal is too large to send via email or if you need other assistance, contact Lindsay Weaver at (850) 717-9037. 0 Packet Pg. 289 9.A.9 From: Suauri, Vitor To: james.french(c colliercountvfl.aov Cc: DCPexternalaaencvcomments; Reina, Bessie; Enaala, Todd Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Proposed CPA 20-04 / Collier County / Expedited State Review / No Comment Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 3:11:27 PM Mr. French, Pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes (F.S.), in its role as a reviewing agency as identified in Section 163.3184(1)(c), F.S., the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) reviewed Collier County's Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) package 20- 04ESR. FDOT Review Comment: FDOT determined the proposed amendment has no significant adverse impacts to transportation resources or facilities of state importance. Technical Assistance Comment #1: The land uses / development patterns drive the development of transportation systems along with their safe and efficient operation. In an effort to decrease overall passenger vehicle trips on the roadway network, FDOT supports the planning and development of well -planned, dense, interconnected, and mixed -use communities that promote the use of multimodal alternatives, such as transit and bicycle/pedestrian facilities. These types of development aid in mitigating potential transportation impacts on the roadway network, promote safety and economic development, and improve quality of life for all residents in the County. FDOT offers several initiatives to assist the County in creating quality developments while protecting future mobility on the regional roadway network, including "Complete Streets", and a commitment to bicycle and pedestrian safety. FDOT appreciates your commitment to intergovernmental coordination and the opportunity to review and comment on the adopted amendment. Thank you, Vitor Suguri, Ph.D. Community Planner Florida Department of Transportation - District One 10041 Daniels Parkway Fort Myers, FL 33913 (239) 225-1959 - Desk (863) 221-1707 - Cell OI IIB GIFT U salatu. -- ►EV€P DRIVE WAIQEDS.:mill FE]❑Y ` Packet Pg. 290 9.A.10 From: Cucinella. Josh To: warnoldCaMradvminor.com Cc: anita.jenkinsCabcolliercountvFl.aov; corbv.schmidt(a)colliercoutvfl.gov; BLavman(ftarroncollier.com; DCPexternalagencvcomments; Keltner. James; Conservation Planning Services: Amoah. Kat Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Collier County 20-04ESR (PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, GGAMP) Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 4:16:08 PM Attachments: FWC Florida Black Bear Technical Assistance 2020.odf Dear Mr. Arnold: C d Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan amendment in accordance E with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. At this time, our comments are limited to advisory information and recommendations for reducing potential conflicts with Florida black bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) on the 20-acre project site located on the west side of Immokalee Road (County Road 846), approximately 0.3 miles south of Oil Well Road. Q FWC has received 129 reports of human -bear conflicts within roughly a one -mile radius of the project site since 2000. Florida black d bears are frequent in this area which is within the South Bear Management Unit identified in the 2019 Bear Management Plan. Please review the attached document for important information related to potential measures that can be taken to avoid or minimize negative wildlife interactions during the planning, construction, and operation phases of this project. Although the document specifically addresses v residential development, many of the same measures may be utilized to avoid or minimize negative interactions during the construction y and operation of this proposed commercial development. Additional information including Collier County's Bear Ordinance may be :a found at httns://www.colliercountyfl.eov/your-government/denartments/public-utilities-de partment/solid-hazardous-waste-management- division/bearwise#:—:text=Collierg/g20Countyg/o2Cg/o20ing/`20consultationg/`20with.county'sg/g20solidg/o20waste%20collection°/g20program. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office by email at ConservationPlanningServices&MyFWC.comcom. If you have specific technical questions, please contact Jim Keltner at (239) 332-6972 x9209 or by email James.Keltner&MVFWC.com. Sincerely, E O Josh Cucinella V Biological Administrator II W Office of Conservation Planning Services O Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission y 1239 SW loth Street W Ocala, Florida 34471 (352) 620-7330 O O Collier County 20-04ESR 42786 d O E E N M LO T v L d d J C d E E O V t� ti LL 0i 0 r-� C O E t c� O .-r r� Q Packet Pg. 291 9.A.10 Technical Assistance Regarding the Florida Black Bear - 2020 Dear Applicant, Property Owner, and Interested Parties: According to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) data, there is the potential for Florida black bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) to occur in the project area. The FWC received a sufficient number of reports of human -bear conflicts, evidence of bears collected by researchers, reports of bears killed by vehicles surrounding the project, or other data to recommend measures that may prevent or Florida Fish reduce conflicts with bears. and Wildlife While Florida black bears tend to shy away from people, they are adaptable and will take advantage of Conservation human -provided food sources. This includes sources that are currently available near this site or sources Commission available after construction, including unsecured garbage, pet food, and bird seed. Once bears become accustomed to finding food around people, their natural wariness is reduced to the point that there can be an Commissioners increased risk to private property and public safety. Robert A. Spottswood Chairman During the construction phase, construction sites should be kept clean, with refuse that might attract bears Key west kept separate from construction debris and stored securely in bear -resistant containers or removed daily Michael W. Sole from the construction site before dark. Refuse that might attract bears includes all food and drink -related Vice Chairman materials, as well as any items with strong scents like cleaning agents. If a homeowners' association or Tequesta community covenants are planned, by-laws that would require residents to take measures to prevent Rodney Barreto attracting bears into the neighborhood are recommended. By-law language used by other Florida Coral Gables communities is available at (http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/bear/living/community- group/b. 1�). Once construction activities are complete, residents should be provided with bear -resistant Steven Hudson garbage cans as part of their regular waste service and any larger waste storage containers should also be Fort Lauderdale bear -resistant. Providing residents with information on how to avoid human -bear conflicts is also Gary Lester recommended. This information can include: Oxford • Options for keeping garbage secure which can include using bear -resistant garbage containers, Gary Nicklaus Jupiter modifying regular cans to be bear -resistant, or keeping cans secure in a garage or sturdy shed and then placing garbage on the curb the morning of pick-up rather than the night before Sonya Rood (hiip://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managedibear/living/attractants/); St. Augustine • Removing bird and wildlife feeders, or modifying them to exclude bears (http://myfwc. com/wildlifehabitats/managedibear/wildlife-feeders/); • Using electric fencing to secure outdoor attractants like fruiting trees/shrubs, gardens, compost, Office of the Executive Director and small livestock (hops://myfwc.com/media/ 1886/ElectricFence.pdf/); Eric Sutton • Proper composting in bear range Executive Director (ho2s://myfwc.com/media/1888/howtocompostinbearcountrypdf); Thomas H. Eason, Ph.D. • Keeping pets safe (hops://myfwc.com/media/1892/protect-your-pet.pdf ); and Assistant Executive Director • Cleaning and securing barbeque grills. Jennifer Fitzwater Chief of Staff Information should also include guidelines for how residents should respond to bears in the area, such as: 850-487-3796 850-921-5786 FAX • What to do if they encounter a bear, whether from a distance or at close range (hiips://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/living/encounter/), and Managing fish and wildlife . When and how to contact the FWC regarding a bear issue resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit (https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/nuisance-contact/). of people. FWC can always assist with residential planning to incorporate the above recommendations and reduce the potential for unwanted interactions between bears and humans. Please feel free to contact our office at ConservationPlannineServicesgmyfwc.com for technical assistance. 620 South Meridian Street Sincerely, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600 Voice: 850-488-4676 .i Hearing/speech-impaired: ( f 800-955-8771(T) Jason Hight 800 955-8770 (V) g Land Use Planning Program Administrator MyFwC.com Office of Conservation Planning Services r� Q Packet Pg. 292 9.A.11 From: Oblaczynski, Deborah To: James French (JamesFrench(c collieraov.net) Cc: Eubanks, Ray; anita.jenkins(a colliercountyfl.aov; Powell, Barbara; Corby Schmidt (cordyschmidt(a colliergov.net); Marciaret Wuerstle (mwuerstle(@swfr)c.org); DCPexternalaaencycomments Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Collier County, DEO #20-4ESR Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 9:08:29 AM Dear Mr. French: The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the proposed amendment package from Collier County (County). The amendment revises the Rural Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Maps to add the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict to the Estates Commercial District for a 20-acre property. The proposed changes do not appear to adversely impact the water resources within the District; therefore, the District has no comments on the proposed amendment package. The District requests that the County forward a copy of the adopted amendments to the District. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Deb Oblaczynski Policy & Planning Analyst Water Supply Implementation Unit Please be advised I am working from home until further notice. I can be contacted at: South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Email: doblaczy&sfwmd.gov or Cell Phone: 561-315-1474 Packet Pg. 293 9.A.12 ) 3 5 ,)... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will behold by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on April 27, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, to consider the enactment of two County Ordinances. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The titles of the proposed Ordinances are as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE 89- 05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS AND MAP SERIES TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL, SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C-3) ZONING DISTRICT AND SOME GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) USES WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 19.13t ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20160000221] AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BCHD I CPUD ON PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 19.13t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200000546] A copy of the proposed Ordinances are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl oov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrev WilliaOcolliercountAl cov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Packet Pg. 294 Co IeT C01414ty Growth Management Department November 05, 2020 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Processing Administrator Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Division of Community Planning/Plan Review and Processing 107 East Madison Street -- MSC 160 Tallahassee, Florida 323994120 RE: Transmittal of the Single, Proposed "2018 Cycle 2" Growth Management Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3)(b)1., F-S , pertaining to the Expedited State Review Process, Collier County is transmitting three (3) copies (two CDs and one hard copy) of the single petition within the 2018 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan amendment, including all support data, to the Department of Economic Opportunity, and one copy of this entire transmittal package (on CD) is being sent, on the same date as this letter, to the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water Management District, Florida Department of Transportation District One, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services/Florida Forest Service, Florida Department of State/Bureau of Historic Preservation, and Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. This amendment was reviewed in advertised public hearing by the Collier County Planning Commission (local planning agency) on August 6, and September 17, 2020. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners reviewed the Growth Management Plan amendment in an advertised public hearing on October 27, 2020 and approved it by adoption of Resolution No. 2020-197. A summary of the single amendment is as follows (more details are provided in the Staff Report to the Collier County Planning Commission and the Executive Summary to the Board of County Commissioners): PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, a petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element by adding a new Subdistrict in the Estates — Mixed Use District, revising the Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict, and adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will: allow a maximum commercial intensity of C-3 and select C-4 uses, and 200,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space; and, furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity et al. The subject property is located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The property has approximately 180 feet of frontage on 4th Street NE, and 990 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27, consisting of ±20 acres. Office of the Dexaiy Depa tT)ent Head • 2800 No* Horseshoe Drrue • 141es Florida 34104.239-252-5717 • mm colliemnto gov C0 ler Caunty Growth Management Department This amendment qualifies for the Expedited State Review Process set forth in Chapter 163.3184(3), F.S, as does not trigger the provisions of Chapter 163.3184(2)(c), F.S., i.e. the amendment is not within an area of critical state concern, is not within Collier County's rural land stewardship area, is not a sector plan, is not evaluation and appraisal -based, is not DRI-related, and does not qualify as a small scale amendment. Collier County has previously provided its complete adopted Growth Management Plan, including amendments and support documents, to all review agencies listed in Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. Collier County tentatively proposes to hold adoption hearings on the proposed amendment in Winter 2020 and Spring 2021. Finally, if you have questions or need additional information, please contact: Anita Jenkins, AICP, Interim Division Director, or Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: A. Jenkins 239-252-8288 or C. Schmidt 239-252-2944 Email: anita.jenkinsf:')colliercountyfl.g_ov or Corby.schmidt(a-colliercountyfl.gov Sincerely, 1 James French, Deputy Department Head Growth Management Department cc: Board of County Commissioners Leo Ochs, County Manager Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council - w/ attachment South Florida Water Management District - w/ attachment Florida Department of Transportation, District One - w/ attachment Florida Department of Environmental Protection - w/attachment Florida Department ofAgriculture & Consumer Services/Florida Forest Service - w/ attachment Florida Department of State/Bureau of Historic Preservation - w/ attachment Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission - w/ attachment GMPA File — 2018 Cycle 2 - June 11Bcc.colliergoy.neMatalGMD-LDS1Developmenl RevievnCDES Planning ServiceMComprehensiveTomp Planning GMP DATMComp Plan Amendments=18 Cycles & Smalls=18 Cyde 2 - hm Cycle 11CP-18-4 GGAMP Immok - Ests1CP-18.4 TransrT0a1 LtV to DE0 drf docx Office of the Deputy Department Head • 2800 North Hasestioe Drrve • Naples, Honda 34104.239-252-5717 - wm.colliemuntyfl.gov RESOLUTION NO. 20-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20t ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20160000221] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, BCHD Partners I, LLC, requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series to add the Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict to the Estates Commercial District; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 2020 and September 17, 2020, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and [18-CMP-01005/1566894/11121 PL20160000221 Page 1 of 2 9/23/20 Words underlined are additions, words strack through are deletions. WHEREAS, on October 27, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of O C -h 6tx , 2020. ATTEST:- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRY TAL K. TL, CLERK COLLIE LINTY FLO DA llbko�� BY: ,n5 a to ChaWW Clerk Burt L. Saunders, Chairman signature only. Approved as to form and legality: eidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [18-CMP-01005/1566894/11121 PL20160000221 Page 2 of 2 9/23/20 Words underlined are additions, words str-uck through are deletions. Exhibit PL2016000022IICP-2018-4 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT Policy 1.1.4: [Page 1 ] The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: B. Estates — Commercial District *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 1. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 2. Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict 3. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [Page 9] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District [Page 16] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District [Page 16] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is approximately twentv (20) acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a varietv of commercial land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the followin a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development P( UD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: ■ Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41; Page 1 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. Exhibit PL2016000022IICP-2018-4 ■ Motor freight transportation and warehousing (mini- and self -storage warehousing only, SIC 4225); ■ Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; ■ Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072; ■ Nursing and professional care facilities, SIC 8051, 8052, 80W The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited up to a maximum intensity of 200,000 square feet of gross floor area. e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 22) shall only be utilized for employee and emergency vehicle access only, native preservation and buffer areas. f. Interconnection shall be provided with properties fronting Immokalee Road located immediately to the north and south. C. List of Maps *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Everglades — Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict [Page 27] GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2018 Cycles & Smalls\2018 Cycle 2 - frm Cycle 1\CP-18-4 GGAMP Immok - Ests\Exhbt A txt & maps\18-4 Immok—Estates Sbdstrct post -BCC modified txt Ex. A_FNL.docx Page I of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck -through are deleted. EXHIBIT "A" PETITION PL20160000261 / CP-2018-4 ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICDLNRAL / RDRAL DESIGNATION MWED USE DISTRICT auai senlemem Arse Oialnn wuanuel se�lee suoaemcl Co Oioeel U—S�...ct OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATDRES - na,ae s„ee,n M4rswamrcl ®wwera vmunoenne o.a v COMMERCIAL DISTRICTm _ Renaell BOWeverd Commwciel sutiMaNvi — E aloe Snooprp nur Sutaiwn � immarew Re,demLa wm..ran s�eal,val 0 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 10 L FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE RD xore: � z SUBJECT SITE m - o w w OIL WELL RD ❑ m RANDAIIL BLVD IMMOKALEE RD z O tp I 3 o m o I z BEACH RD W ❑ m OU GOLDEN GATE BLVD GOLDEN GATE BLVD r i 1 O � V PINE R GE RD rn ------ - - � zzw PGREENBLVD ❑ > w G. P. INTERSTATE 75 DAVIS BLVD ❑ m S.R. 84 m w ti O O \ RATTI-J'Sl IAKE H MMOCK RD RURAL GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - SEPTEMBER 24. 2015 AMENDED-XXX, XXXX (Ord. No. XXX) O 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles R 9C.F INTERSTATE 75 EXHIBIT A PL20160000221/CP-2018-4 O/ �0 IMMOKALEE ROAD ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA r SUBJECT SITE - - W Z Z CD .a 4.0 V C E 25th VE NE 5th AVE N P ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX LEGEND (Ord. No. XXXX-X) 0 250 500 1,000 Feet SUBJECT SITE IFTI+I I II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve by Resolution the single Petition within the 2018 Cycle Two of Growth Management Plan Amendments for an Amendment specifically Proposed to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element to Establish the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Transmittal Hearing) (PL20160000221/CP-2018-4) OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve the single petition in the 2018 Cycle Two of amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required review agencies. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Comprehensive Plan. • Collier County Resolution No. 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the GMP. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for the 2018 Cycle 2 petition on August 6, and September 17, 2020 (one petition only, PL20160000221/CP-2018-4). • This Transmittal hearing for the 2018 Cycle 2 petition considers an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element. The GMP amendment requested is specific to a non -corner 20-acre property, located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The property has approximately 180 feet of frontage on 4th Street NE, and 990 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 (East Rural Estates Planning Community). This petition seeks to amend the GMP, adopted by Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element by adding a new Subdistrict in the Urban — Mixed Use District, revising the Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict, and adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will: allow a maximum commercial intensity of C-3 and select C-4 uses, and 200,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space. Based on the review of this petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff made the following findings and conclusions: • The 20-acre subject property is zoned E, Estates and undeveloped. • The infrastructure needed to serve the development can be provided without related levels of service or concurrency concerns. • The proposed commercial project is a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. Adverse conditions are attributable to the potential for commercial traffic impacting residential areas. • The proposed Subdistrict will have no impact on the potable water or wastewater treatment systems since the level of service (LOS) standards are based on population and no residential units are proposed in this Subdistrict. • The property, along with much of the surrounding area, is currently designated in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element for residential development — as well as for uses generally allowed throughout the Estates designated area, which allows single-family residential development; parks, recreation and open space uses; institutional uses, e.g., churches and places of worship, group housing, nursing homes, social and fraternal organizations, public and private schools; a variety of -1- agricultural uses; and essential services. This petition introduces new commercial development, uses and activities to a location where commercial development is not now planned. • Sites generally located within the market area currently provide more than 1.05 Million sq. ft. and 289 acres of commercial use opportunities. Approximately 132 of these commercial acres are undeveloped. • Not all commercial uses allowed in the C-4, General Commercial zoning district — by right and by Conditional Use, as proposed — were analyzed and not all uses analyzed were demonstrated to have supportable demand. • Need for the amount of commercial floor space and the full range of commercial development contemplated by this amendment have not been demonstrated. The lower commercial intensity of 180,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space has been found to have supportable demand. • Speakers present at the Neighborhood Information Meeting objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4th Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic. They emphasized the impacts that commercial businesses and traffic would have on their homes, especially where the narrow, westerly portion of the property would be most adversely impacted by traffic and noise. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and for the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for transmittal and its submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required review agencies will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for its Adoption hearings tentatively to be held in late Fall, 2020. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." Section 163.3177(l)(f), F.S. In addition, Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, F.S., provides that plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non- conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. -2- j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. And map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 163.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority vote for approval because this is a Transmittal hearing. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity with the following modifications — to limit commercial uses to those "community commercial" uses for which supportable demand has been demonstrated, protect nearby residents and residential areas from impacts commercial traffic, and for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. — as depicted in the Staff Report. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their August 6, 2020 meeting. At their August 6 meeting, the CCPC asked to: 1) provide for vehicular interconnection to both the north and south; 2) eliminate access to 4tn St. NE; 3) strike "retail and office" and replace with "commercial"; and, 4) refine the uses, and at their September 17, 2020 meeting, and voted [4/01 to forward petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4 to the Board, with the maximum commercial intensity of 180,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space; with a recommendation to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required review agencies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: To approve the Resolution and transmit petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required review agencies, as recommended by the amended Resolution Exhibit A. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and Anita Jenkins, AICP, Interim Division Director, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2018 Cycles & Smalls\2018 Cycle 2 - frm Cycle 1\CP-184 GGAMP Immok - Ests\BCC\16-221 - CP-2018-4 trnsmttl exec summ FNL.docx SIB Agenda Item 9. 4z;0e-r C�oi4-k ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: August 6, 2020, updated for September 17, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] ELEMENT: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS: BCHD Partners I, LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34105 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P. A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises approximately 20.00 acres and is located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, immediately west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The property has approximately 180 feet of frontage on 4th Street NE, and 990 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road. The property lies within the Rural Estates Planning Community, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. REQUESTED ACTION: Noel J. Davies, Attorney Quarles & Brady, LLP 1395 Panther Lane, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34109 This petition seeks to establish a new Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element text, and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) by: -1- CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. 1) Amending Policy 1.1.4 Estates — Commercial District to add the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict name where District and Subdistrict designations are identified, 2) Amending the Estates — Commercial District to add the new Subdistrict provisions, 3) Adding the title of the new Subdistrict map to the itemized Future Land Use Map Series listing, and 4) Amending the Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict, adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The Subdistrict language proposed by this amendment is found in Resolution Exhibit "A". PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petition is proposed to allow for new commercial development, up to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: Subject Property The 20-acre subject property is zoned E, Estates district and undeveloped. The current Future Land Use designation is Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict, and allows single-family residential development; parks, recreation and open space uses; institutional uses, e.g., churches and places of worship, group housing, nursing homes, social and fraternal organizations, public and private schools; a variety of agricultural uses; and essential services. Surrounding Lands: North: Immediately north of the subject property is zoned E, Estates district. Properties north along the 4th Street NE frontage are developed residentially, while properties north along the Immokalee Rd. frontage are undeveloped. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the north is the Residential Estates Subdistrict. East: Immediately east of the subject property, across Immokalee Rd. (a 6-lane divided arterial roadway) is zoned MPUD for the Orange Tree Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, and developing as a mixed -use community. Further east, land is zoned Orange Blossom Ranch MPUD, developing with a residential community. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the east is Agricultural/Rural — Rural Settlement Area District. South: Immediately south of the subject property is zoned E, Estates. Properties south along the 4th Street NE frontage are developed residentially, while properties south along the Immokalee Rd. frontage are undeveloped. Beyond these individual residential properties, lies a ±45 acre parcel (the "Randall Curve" property), which was being held by the County for public uses, is pending sale into private ownership. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the south is the Residential Estates Subdistrict. Further south, across Immokalee Rd., land is zoned MPUD for the Orange Tree Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, and developing as a commercial component of the mixed -use community. West: Immediately west of the subject property, across 4th Street NE (a 2-lane undivided roadway) properties are zoned E, Estates district, and developed residentially. Then further —2— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. west, land is zoned E, Estates, and contains parcels is land characterized by single-family residences and residential lots. These E-zoned parcels are within the Golden Gate Estates subdivision. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the west is the Residential Estates Subdistrict. In summary, the current zoning, and existing and planned land uses, in the area immediately surrounding the Subdistrict property are primarily suburban- and estate -type residences or residential lots in all directions. IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE PERTINENT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE NOTED IN CHAPTER 163, F.S., SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 163.3177(6)(A) 2. AND 8.: Considerations required for the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment are listed below. 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis. —3— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. BACKGROUND, CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYSIS: This report addresses the minimum amount of [commercial] land needed to accommodate anticipated growth based on projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. This is accomplished through the analysis of the subject property and the surrounding area that includes inventorying the supply of existing commercially -developed and potential commercially - developable land, determining population growth, estimating the amount of commercial development that population will demand, and determining whether the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) allocates a sufficient amount of commercial land to accommodate growth. Goal 3 directs the County "to provide for limited commercial services and conditional uses for purposes of serving the rural needs of Golden Gate Estates residents, shortening vehicular trips, and preserving rural character." Objective 3.2 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element further directs the County "to provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other Commercial Land Use Designations." These "other commercial land use designations" are addressed in Policy 3.2.1, which identifies a Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study, [May 2019]. This corridor study has not recommended that future land uses be changed to commercial designations in this area, but are targeted further south, near Randall Road and Wilson Boulevard. Commercial Analysis Commercial Development: Characteristics of the area immediately surrounding the subject property do not reveal a trend toward commercial development. Existing and planned land uses in the area are primarily suburban- and estate -type residences or residential lots in all directions, except to the east within the Orange Tree PUD. Within four miles from the subject property, commercial development is evident, including the following approved projects: ♦ Orange Blossom Ranch commercial component (200,000 sq. ft./44.0 ac.) [±2.0 miles east at Oil Well Rd.] (200,000 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Orange Tree commercial component (332,000 sq. ft./33.3 ac.) [immediately east at the Immokalee Rd. — Orange Tree Blvd. intersection] (53,342 sq. ft. developed — 278,658 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Randall Boulevard Center (21,000 sq. ft./5.15 ac.) [±0.65 mile south at the Immokalee Rd. — Randall Blvd. intersection] (3,350 sq. ft. developed—17,650 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Mir -Mar (20,000 sq. ft./2.38 ac.) [±0.66 mile south at the Immokalee Rd. — Randall Blvd. intersection] (19,000 sq. ft. developed — 1,000 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Wilson Boulevard Center (42,000 sq. ft.) [±4.0 road miles south at the Wilson Blvd. — Golden Gate Blvd. intersection] (41,038 sq. ft. developed) ♦ Heritage Bay PUD/DRI commercial component (230,000 sq. ft./73.5 ac.) [±2.0 miles east] (179,086 sq. ft. developed — 50,914 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Estates Shopping Center (150,000 sq. ft./40 ac.) [±4.0 road miles south at the Wilson Blvd. — Golden Gate Blvd. intersection] (150,000 sq. ft. developable) These sites, generally located within the 15-minute drive -time market area currently provide more than 1.05 Million sq. ft. and 289 acres of commercial use opportunities in the [Urban Land Institute —4— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. (ULI)-defined] Neighborhood Center, Community Center, and Regional Center development categories. The amount of existing and zoned commercial space found within a 15-minute drive time of the proposed Subdistrict exceeds these 1,053,993 sq. ft. on 289.71 acres, as revealed by the market analysis evaluated below. Generally, commercial development can be categorized as strip commercial, neighborhood commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth, based upon shopping center size, commercial uses, and population/area served. Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income, household size, percentage of income spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate supportable commercial square feet for different commercial intensities for that geography by shopping center type. The petitioner characterizes development proposed for this Subdistrict as a community shopping center. The community shopping center is larger than a neighborhood center with neither a traditional department store nor the trade area of a regional shopping center. The Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) calculates drive times and explains, in general, community centers have a drive time [market] area of 10 to 20 minutes depending on the size [given 192,700 sq. ft. average total floor space & 177,328 sq. ft. median floor space]. General Visual Comparison: For a general idea of what 200,000 square feet of commercial may look like, the Brookhollow shopping center shown in the artist rendering is a close comparison on 24- acres. This is not an illustration of the applicant's site design but shows an example of the current market trend easily recognizable throughout our own community. In Collier County, the Courthouse Shadows property is similar in the 20 acre size to the applicant's property, and provides for 165,000 square feet of commercial and 300 multi- family units. Construction underway for Brookhollow shopping center January 23, 2020 by Adam Zuvanich — B Comments Iwo Construction has began for Brook hollow Marketplace. a 200.000 square foot shopping center at the corner of U.S. 290 and Dacorna Street. {Contrihuted artist's rendering) Fidelis Realty Partners announced Thursday that construction has begun for Brookhollow Marketplace. a 200,000 square foot shopping center at the site of the farmer Exxon Mobil campus at the intersection of D.S.290 and Dacoma Street in Northwest Houston. The upcoming retail destination will include Burlington, Five Below, Michaels, Old Navy, Rack Room Shoes, Ross, T.J. Maxxand Ulta, according toa news release from Fidelis, which purchased the24-acre property in 2016. An 80,000 square foot floor & Decoralso will be part of a the complex. as will an additional38.000 square feet of iniine space for diming, health and beauty, medical and service businesses. Retailers in the center are expected to open in the fa II of 2020, Fi delis said. Petitioner's Retail Market Analysis: The firm of Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. conducted a Commercial Needs Analysis, updated to August 27, 2019 independently analyzing market conditions for this petition (Exhibit "V.D.rev2"). —5— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. This analysis provides context for assessing a specific selection of goods and services' requirements of the emerging population within the market area identified. The Analysis provided the following data and analysis: Section 2, Population Growth Around Subject Property This section provided an overview of population growth (utilizing 2018 figures) and applied a multiplier to estimate and forecast populations on which to base the remainder of the Analysis. The Analysis identified a 15- minute drive time as its market area for this medium - size community shopping center. This 15-minute drive time area is delineated in this figure, copied from the Analysis. For our evaluation, the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) was utilized. It estimates a 69,120 population for the market area in 2020, and projects 90,699 people in 2030, and 104,405 in 2040. Section 3.1, Market Area Demand Countywide population figures were then apportioned to the 15-minute drive time market area to represent any additional commercial demand for this location. This calculation yielded a demand of 17.27 sq. ft. of commercial space per capita. The demand analysis suggested the market area can support 1,051,502 sq. ft. of all commercial needs in this market area at this time; 1,455,977 sq. ft. of commercial needs in this market area by 2030; and, 1,084,609 sq. ft. of commercial needs in this market area by 2040. The CIGM was again utilized, and population and commercial demand projections through 2040 supported the need for additional community commercial uses in the market area. The community commercial demand for the market area is approximately 137,340 sq. ft. in 2020, approximately 193,190 sq. ft. in 2030, and approximately 322,810 sq. ft. in 2040. Section 3.2, Market Area Supply The applicant's Needs Analysis inventoried 725,404 sq. ft. of existing commercial development (on 114.54 ac.) of developed "competing commercial parcels" located in the market area. The Needs Analysis inventoried (approximately 701,050 sq. ft. of undeveloped commercial) on 110.69 acres of undeveloped "competing parcels" located in the market area. The supply analysis suggests no less than 1,426,454 sq. ft. of developed and undeveloped commercial space is available in the market area. The CIGM identifies a supply of 1,691,857 sq. ft. developed and undeveloped commercial space available in the market area. —6— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. Section 3.3, Supply — Demand Analysis This section applied a diminishing allocation ratio, allowing the market to properly function in the sale, usage and allocation of land over time. This suggests the growing market area can support the additional commercial uses (1.626.454 total sa. ft.) in this market by 2040. Staff Assessment of Petitioner's Retail Market Analvsis The analysis provided in the Needs Analysis is an objective population -based demand methodology and suspends our reliance on evaluating certain types of businesses to demonstrate need. Not all commercial uses allowed in the CA General Commercial zoning district — by right and by Conditional Use, as proposed — were analyzed however, and not all uses analyzed were demonstrated to have supportable demand. The intensities of C-4 commercial uses and activities allowing for the outside storage of merchandise, such as automobile sales, rental and leasing, marine vessel and recreational vehicle (RV) dealers, and the renting and leasing of equipment; mini- and self -storage warehousing; hotels and motels; and, certain entertainment and recreational attractions are disparate with low density single-family residential areas. These disparities, if allowed by this Subdistrict, introduce incompatibilities between potentially non -complimentary land uses that may not be overcome in rezoning. This uncertainty leads staff to consider a lower commercial intensity for the Subdistrict overall, and to defer review of any Conditional Use proposed. The uses shown to be appropriately suited to "community commercial" centers are: apparel and accessory stores, auto and home supply stores, building cleaning and maintenance services, cable and other pay television services including communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09, carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, computer and computer software stores, dance studios, schools and halls, indoor, department stores, disinfecting and pest control services, eating and drinking establishments excluding bottle clubs. all establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01, electrical and electronic repair shops, food stores, general merchandise stores, hardware stores, home furniture and furnishings stores, household appliance stores, medical and dental laboratories, musical instrument stores, nursing and professional care facilities, paint stores, personal services, miscellaneous, radio, television and consumer electronics stores, repair services - miscellaneous (except agricultural equipment repair, awning repair, beer pump coil cleaning and repair, blacksmith shops, catch basin, septic tank and cesspool cleaning, industrial truck repair, machinery cleaning, repair of service station equipment, boiler cleaning, tinsmithing, tractor repair), research, development and testing services, retail — miscellaneous, telephone communications including communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09, veterinary services, excluding outside kenneling, and watch, clock and jewelry repair. The County's CIGM provides for an average 8,878 sq. ft. of commercial floor space/acre in community commercial centers. This amounts to a lower commercial intensity (than is proposed) of approximately 178,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space. Additionally, the intensities of the commercial uses themselves, only where shown to be appropriately suited to "community commercial" centers, and approved by the companion Planned Unit Development rezone will be supported. —7— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: The subject property is located in a County wellfield protection zone (as illustrated by applicant's Exhibit W.F.2"). This "W-4 Zone" underlies the land area between two nearby, fully protected wells/wellfields: one located approximately 1.25 miles to the southwest of the subject property near 24t" Avenue NW and Wilson Blvd. [protecting the Collier County Utilities Golden Gate Wellfield], and another located less than a mile to the northeast of the subject property near Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) and Grove Drive [protecting the Orangetree Wellfield]. An Environmental Report, dated September 2019, prepared by Peninsula Engineering was submitted with this petition (Exhibit W.C"). Environmental review specialists with Collier County's Development Review Division, Environmental Planning Section reviewed these documents and provided the following comments: Natural vegetation areas consist primarily of slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm communities. The acreage of native vegetation on site will be field verified by staff during review of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) or Conditional Use (CU) for the project. The proposed GMP amendment has no effect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. TRAFFIC CAPACITY/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT ANALYSIS, INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions submitted a Traffic Impact Statement, updated to 9/06/2019 (unlabeled exhibit). The project's area of influence was determined to be Immokalee Road north (east) and south (west) of the project at the Orange Tree Boulevard intersection. The analysis studied: • Immokalee Rd., from Collier Blvd. (west) to north of Oil Well Rd. (east); • Wilson Blvd., south of Immokalee Rd.; • Oil Well Rd., from east of Immokalee Rd.; • Randall Blvd., from Immokalee Rd. to Everglades Blvd.; and, those roadways with lesser anticipated trip distribution: ■ 4th Street NE, north of Immokalee Rd. ■ 8th St. NE, south of Randall Blvd. ■ Orange Tree Blvd., east of Immokalee Rd.; Fully 100% of traffic accessing the property comes from Immokalee Rd. (40% southbound /westbound; 50% northbound/eastbound), and 10% crossing east/west at Orange Tree Blvd.). Based on the traffic impact analysis, the proposed commercial project is a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. The proposed commercial project would generate 9,632 daily gross new trips (2-way) and 908 PM Peak Hour gross new trips routed through a single, full -movement access point, located at Orange Tree Blvd., and [un-evaluated] limited access onto 41" Street NE. Adverse conditions are attributable to the potential for commercial traffic impacting residential areas. -8- CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. Policy 3.2.1 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element also identifies a Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study, after which, an Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study will evaluate the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. and may propose changes to future land uses. The transportation study is moving forward and anticipated to be implemented in phases. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACTS: Application materials submitted include a Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis, updated to August 29, 2019 (Exhibit ' V.E"), along with a Public Facilities Map. No issues or concerns are identified regarding impacts on potable water, wastewater management, solid waste, drainage, park and recreational facilities, schools, or EMS and fire control services. • Potable Water System: The subject project lies in the Collier County Water -Sewer District's Regional Water Service Area and development will be served by Collier County Public Utilities. The proposed Subdistrict will have no impact on the potable water system since the level of service (LOS) standard is based on population and no residential units are proposed in this Subdistrict. • Wastewater Treatment System: The subject project currently lies outside the service area of a wastewater reclamation facility. The property, however, lies adjacent to the Collier County Water -Sewer District's Northeast Sub -Regional (former Orangetree) Wastewater Service Area, presently undergoing design -build -construction of a 1.5 MGD interim treatment plant and associated pipelines, due to be complete in 2021. When wastewater treatment facilities are complete and service become available, development can be served by Collier County Public Utilities. The proposed Subdistrict will have no impact on the wastewater treatment system since the level of service (LOS) standard is based on population and no residential units are proposed in this Subdistrict. • Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: The solid waste disposal service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The average daily disposal rate for the commercial project is estimated at 1,000 lbs. per day, with an estimated annual disposal of 365,000 lbs., or 182.5 tons. The 2019 AUIR recognizes that the County has approximately 42 years (2061) of remaining landfill capacity, but will reach its additional permitted capacity by or before 2051. • Stormwater Management System: The 2019 AUIR does not identify any stormwater management improvement projects in the vicinity of the subject property. Future development will comply with the SFWMD and/or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater events by both on -site and off -site improvements. • Park and Recreational Facilities: No impact on the demand for park facilities result from the proposed Subdistrict that allows only non-residential development. • Schools: No impact on the demand for public school facilities result from the proposed Subdistrict that allows only non-residential development. • Fire & Rescue, Emergency Medical (EMS), and Sheriff's Services: • Fire protection and response services are provided by the North Collier Fire & Rescue District, with District Station 10 (located at 13240 Immokalee Rd.) located approximately three-quarters of a mile (0.75) from the site. • Emergency Medical services are provided by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, with EMS Station 10 (located at 14756 Immokalee Rd.) located within one-half mile (0.40) from the site. —9— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. • Protection services are provided by the Collier County Sherriff's Office, with District 4 Substation (located at 14750 Immokalee Rd.) located within one-half mile (0.40) from the site. The proposed commercial development is anticipated to have no significant impacts on these emergency services. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05.E was [duly advertised, noticed and] held on Monday, February 24, 2020, 5:30 p.m. at Greater Naples Fire Rescue District Station 71, 100 131h St. SW, Naples. Approximately eight people other than the application team and County staff attended — and heard the following information: The agent representing this petition (D. Wayne Arnold) introduced other members of the application team present, and transportation planner, Norm Trebilcock (of Trebilcock Consulting). He also introduced staff Planner representing Collier County — Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner and project coordinator for the GMP amendment petition. Mr. Arnold identified the subject property's location, fronting on 4th Street NE, and on Immokalee Rd. at the Orange Tree Blvd. intersection. He described the proposed commercial development of 200,000 sq. ft. of C-4 intensity, both by - right and conditional use, commercial uses, that the new Subdistrict would allow. Neighbors pointed out that existing residential uses characterized this area, along with future plans for Estates agricultural, residential and conditional uses. They asked how this proposal would be good for the area? Mr. Arnold explained how the traffic volume on Immokalee Rd., along with a signalized intersection at Orange Tree Blvd. makes this a good location for commercial development. Many of those present objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4th Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic. They emphasized the impacts that commercial businesses and traffic would have on their homes, especially where the narrow, westerly portion of the property would be most adversely impacted by traffic and noise. They asked the developers to consider alternatives, such as restricting or limiting commercial development and commercial traffic on westerly portion of the property. The information meeting was completed by 6:10 p.m. The applicant transcribed the full proceedings of this meeting, and that transcript, along with their PowerPoint presentation and presentation notes have been copied and are on record. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] —10— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The reviews and analyses of this petition provide the following findings and conclusions: • The 20-acre subject property is zoned E, Estates and undeveloped. • The infrastructure needed to serve the development can be provided without related levels of service or concurrency concerns. • The proposed commercial project is a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. Adverse conditions are attributable to the potential for commercial traffic impacting residential areas. • The proposed Subdistrict will have no impact on the potable water or wastewater treatment systems since the level of service (LOS) standards are based on population and no residential units are proposed in this Subdistrict. • The property, along with much of the surrounding area, is currently designated in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element for residential development - as well as for uses generally allowed throughout the Estates designated area, which allows single-family residential development; parks, recreation and open space uses; institutional uses, e.g., churches and places of worship, group housing, nursing homes, social and fraternal organizations, public and private schools; a variety of agricultural uses; and essential services. This petition introduces new commercial development, uses and activities to a location where commercial development is not now planned. • Sites generally located within the market area currently provide more than 1.05 Million sq. ft. and 289 acres of commercial use opportunities. Approximately 132 of these commercial acres are undeveloped. • Not all commercial uses allowed in the C-4, General Commercial zoning district - by right and by Conditional Use, as proposed - were analyzed and not all uses analyzed were demonstrated to have supportable demand. • Need for the amount of commercial floor space and the full range of commercial development contemplated by this amendment have not been demonstrated. The lower commercial intensity of 178,000 sq. ft. of overall commercial floor space has been found to have supportable demand. • Speakers present at the Neighborhood Information Meeting objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4th Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic. They emphasized the impacts that commercial businesses and traffic would have on their homes, especially where the narrow, westerly portion of the property would be most adversely impacted by traffic and noise. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Office of the County Attorney and has been approved as to form and legality. The criteria for growth management plan amendments and land use map amendments are in Sections 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. This staff report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on July 23, 2020. [HFAC] -11- CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2018-4 /PL20160000221, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity with the following modifications - to limit commercial uses to those "community commercial" uses for which supportable demand has been demonstrated by the petitioner's data and analysis, protect nearby residents and residential areas from impacts commercial traffic, and for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. - as depicted below: Note: Words underlined are added, words StF Gk threygI4 are deleted — as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted — as proposed by staff. Italicized text within brackets is explanatory only — not to be adopted. B. Estates - Commercial District [Page 16] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is approximately twent_ _20� acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road, as depicted on the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide a variety of retail and office land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subiect to the followina: a. All development within this Subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those: ■ Uses permitted by right and by conditional use in the C- 3. Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code. Ordinance No. 04-41: ■ Veterinary services, excluding outside kenneling. SIC 0742: ■ Motor freight transportation and warehousing (mini- and self -storage warehousing only. SIC 4225) e ■ Cable and other pay television services including communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09, SIC 3663: ■ Telephone communications including communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09. SIC 4813: ■ Paint stores, SIC 5231; ■ Hardware stores, SIC 5251 , ■ General merchandise stores, SIC 5311 - 5399: ■ Food stores, SIC 5411 - 5499: ■ Auto and home supply stores. SIC 5531: -12- CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. ■ Apparel and accessory stores (no adult oriented sales). SIC 5611 — 5699: ■ Computer and computer software stores. SIC 5734: ■ Home furniture and furnishings stores. SIC 5712 — 5739: ■ Eating and drinking establishments excluding bottle clubs. All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption are subeect to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01, SIC 5812. 5813: ■ Personal services, miscellaneous, SIC 7211 — 7299; ■ Disinfecting and pest control services. SIC 7342: ■ Building cleaning and maintenance services. SIC 7349, others: ■ Electrical and electronic repair shops. SIC 7378. 7622. 7629: ■ Carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, SIC 7542; ■ Watch, clock and iewelry repair SIC 7631: ■ Repair services - miscellaneous (except agricultural equipment repair. awning repair, beer pump coil cleaning and repair, blacksmith shops, catch basin. septic tank and cesspool cleaning, industrial truck repair, machinery cleaning, repair of service station equipment, boiler cleaning, tinsmithina, tractor repair). SIC 7623, 7 999, ■ Dance studios, schools and halls, indoor, SIC 7911: ■ Medical and dental laboratories, SIC 8071, 8072; ■ Nursing and professional care facilities. SIC 8051, 8052. 8059: ■ Research, development and testing services. retail — miscellaneous. SIC 8732. 8 334: The rezone Ordinance shall limit these uses further to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. d. Development is limited uD to a maximum intensity of 178,000 square feet of aross floor area. e. The westerly portion of this subdistrict (a.k.a. north 180 ft. of Tract 116, GGE Unit 221 shall only be utilized for employee and emergency vehicle access only_ —native preservation and buffer areas. PETITION No.: CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Staff Report for the August 6, 2020, now September 17, 2020 CCPC meeting. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the October 27, 2020, BCC meeting. GAMES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATXComp Plan Amendments\2018 Cycles & Smalls12018 Cycle 2 - frm Cycle 11CP-18-4 GGAMP Immok - Ests=PMCP-18-4 Immok-Estates modified Stff Rprt_REV 2.8 updated drft.docx —13— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. Addendum to the Staff Report to the CCPC for CP-zo18-4 / PLw160000zzi A number of land uses at issue were identified in an discussion involving staff, petitioner, and petitioner's representatives. These included predominantly those requested C-4, General Commercial zoning district uses that are not currently recommended for this new Subdistrict designation by staff, such as, motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, mini- and self -storage warehousing only), car washes (7542), nursing and professional care facilities (8051 - 8059), and hotels and motels (7011, 7021, & 7041). Petitioner anticipates submitting revisions to propose removal of certain uses from their list of requested uses, and additions to the list those uses identified above. Still at issue: hotels and motels remaining unallowed. Another issue discussed was the maximum amount of commercial floor space recommended for this new Subdistrict designation by staff. While up to 200,000 sq. ft. is requested, the County's CIGM supports only 178,000 sq. ft., as recommended. Petitioner anticipates submitting revisions to propose the greater amount of commercial floor space. Still at issue: maximum amount of floor space unallowed. Final issue discussed was writing entries into Subdistrict provisions for [usable points of] interconnection with abutting properties to both north and south. Petitioner believes he is able to provide for such interconnections. Providingfor this in FLUE Subdistrict is no longer at issue. —14— CP-2018-4 / PL20160000221 Establishing the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Application and Supporting Documents April 2,, 2020 CCPC Hearing wGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects February 23, 2018 (revised May 25, 2018, August 29, 2019) Mr. David Weeks Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Dear Mr. Weeks: A Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application for properties located at the north of Randall Boulevard on the western side of Immokalee Road is being submitted for review. This application proposes to create a new Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to permit general commercial uses. The amendment will proved for a maximum of 200,000 square feet of commercial uses to be permitted within the entirety of the 20± acre subdistrict. The proposed amendment reflects the market demand for additional commercial development in this portion of Golden Gate Estates. A market analysis has been prepared demonstrating market demand for the proposed commercial component. The GMPA is supported with a soon to be submitted companion PUD rezone, which establishes the specific development standards for the commercial uses and provides a conceptual PUD Master Plan. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: David Genson GradyMinor File Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER PL20160000221 DATE RECEIVED PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE March 1, 2016 DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant David Genson Company BCHD Partners I LLC Address 2600 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34105 Phone Number 239-262-2600 Fax Number B. Name of Agent * D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number Fax Number C. Name of Owner (s) of Record BCHD Partners I LLC Address 2600 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34105 Phone Number 239-262-2600 Fax Number D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. Please see Exhibit I-D II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Please see Exhibit II C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (04/2019, 02/2016 and 03/1987) leased (): Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Please see Exhibit III.A B. GENERAL LOCATION Subject property is located on the west side of Immokalee Road approximately one half mile north of Randall Boulevard. C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates E. SIZE IN ACRES 20± acres D. TAZ 400 ZONING E, Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Residential and undeveloped H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS) Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element X Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) iv, 4, 44 and 46 OF THE Golden Gate Area Master Plan ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike -+ ,Tto identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please See Exhibit IV.B. C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict TO Estates Designation, Commercial District, Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map - See Exhibit IV.D. No page numbers are listed on the maps within the map series E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Create Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict inset map - See Exhibit IV.E. No page numbers are listed on maps within the map series V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.0 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. N.A. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 11 INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N/N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y, ** Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) ** Please see Market Study_prepared by Russ Weyer E. PUBLIC FACILITIES l . Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E. Potable Water Exhibit V.E. Sanitary Sewer *** Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Immokalee Road *** Please see Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. Exhibit V.E. Drainage Exhibit V.E. Solid Waste Exhibit V.E. Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit V.F1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Exhibit V.F2 Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N.A. Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Provided $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N.A. $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Provided Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Submitted Electronically 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held a pre -application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $250.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 "=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20160000221 I, B,d;,yA 8—,CHOFinancialOffi— f8a-nC,11m,Management.LLC (print name), as Authorized Agent ofCreekside West, Inc., Manager (title, If applicable) of BCHD Partners I, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicantQcontract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize David Genson, Q Grady Minor & Assoc, P.A. and Quarles & Brady LLP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. �Slgnatucel Bradley A. Boaz, Chief Financ Barron Collier Management, LLC, Authorized Agent of Creekside West, Inc., Manager of BCHD Partners I, LLC. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 'j3 �Zd 2- Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on i 3/ (date) by L(name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL �, C�irIH11SSIQN G�G 287225 F.XP IRES: Ja�wary 14, 2023 . reuFf ,ot• BOf1dCd 11NU i�olarY�►h�cWnRdIN ws CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 Signature of Notary Public 0 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments The applicant is proposing to create a new commercial sub -district within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in order to permit a full range of uses inclusive of permitted and conditional uses of the C-4, General Commercial zoning district. The 20+/- acre parcel is located adjacent to the 6-lane segment of Immokalee Road. Across Immokalee Road is commercially designated tract within the Orange Tree PUD. The property is located directly across from the signalized Orange Tree Boulevard access to the Orange Tree Community. The property is not well suited for low -density residential uses, which is the only use presently permitted on the site. The applicant has commissioned a market analysis, which concludes that there is demand for additional general commercial land uses within the trade area of the site. Wellfield Proximity: Entirety of the Orange Tree community is within the same wellfield, known as the Orangetree Wellfield, proximity to the wellfield does not preclude commercial development. The proposal to expand the Collier County Water/Sewer District boundary to include the subject parcel is beneficial to water quality, as well and septic tanks would no longer be utilized on the site in favor of public potable water and sewer service. Under Chapter 163 F.S., local governments are authorized to adopt and amend their comprehensive plans. Staff has requested that the applicant address three sections from Chapter 163. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. This paragraph requires local governments to address water supply planning as a component of the comprehensive planning process. For the subject application, the property owner intends to petition Collier County to expand the Water/Sewer District service area to include this property. Both water and sewer services are located in the Orange Tree community immediately across Immokalee Road from the subject parcel. The County has recently acquired the Orange Tree Utility, and is evaluating the existing service area and future needs of the area. Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. August 29, 2019 Page I of 3 Chapter 163 Criteria-rev2.docx ® Gradyh4inor c.iut I-Aginccrs • Land 5urvcyors • i'lanncrs • Landscape Archltccts Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. The subject plan amendment as proposed is supported by data and analysis and a study of the market conditions in the vicinity of the property, which indicate that additional supply of commercial acreage is supportable for existing and anticipated populations based on adopted professional methodologies. Further, the Immokalee Road corridors carries tens of thousands of vehicles per day. This location is ideal to capture trips already on the network to service the demands for retail goods. The applicant has also prepared a full traffic impact analysis, which indicates that there are no capacity or operational issues associated with the proposed plan amendment. An environmental assessment has also been completed and the professional opinion of the biologist is that there are no protected flora of consequence, and no protected fauna, inhabiting the site; the site contains approximately 0.4 acres of disturbed cypress wetland; and there are no significant or rare vegetative communities located on site. The undeveloped land is located at the intersection of a signalized intersection. The applicant contends that the character of this undeveloped property is unlike other nearby properties given the access to a signalized intersection and location on a 6-lane arterial roadway. This statutory chapter also references the need to modify plans to address antiquated subdivisions. Golden Gate Estates is an antiquated large lot subdivision, which has promoted urban sprawl without sufficient commercial opportunities located on the perimeter of the community to address the demands of the growing population. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. August 29, 2019 Page 2 of 3 Chapter 163 Criteria-rev2.docx ® GradyMinor c.iut I-:nginccrs • Land 5urvcyors • Manners • Landscape Archltccts Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Statutory Criteria for Plan Amendments The applicant intends for the site to be serviced by urban services at the time of development. The intent is to request an expansion of the Collier County Water/Sewer District for access to potable water and sewer services. The property is suitable for the proposed commercial uses given the proximity to a 6-lane arterial roadway, access to a traffic signal, and the potential to capture vehicle trips already on the high volume roadway. The 20-acre parcel is adequately sized to accommodate the demand for services in the area. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. This Section of statute outlines the process and authority for the agency review of plan amendments. The applicant understands that regional and state reviewing agencies will be responsible for review of any transmitted comprehensive plan amendment per the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. The applicant's experts are of the opinion that there are no regional or state impacts associated with the application. August 29, 2019 Page 3 of 3 Chapter 163 Criteria-rev2.docx ® Gradyh4inor I:i� ii linginccrs • Land Surveyors • 111anncrs • Landscape Arch Itccts Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Exhibit LD Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: Transportation: Market Analysis: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 239.947.0375 fax warnold@gradyminor.com Noel J. Davies Quarles & Brady LLP 1395 Panther Lane, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34109-7874 Office 239-434-4937 Noel. Davies@quarles.com Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 239-566-9551 ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Russ Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 239-269-1341 Rweyer@ree-i.com March 3, 2020 Page 1 of 1 IR15PUD Exhibit ID 03-03-2020.docx © GradyMinor Chrll Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Exhibit II Disclosure of Interest Information B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. BCHD Partners I LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 1 'A Name and Address Percentage of Stock Manager Creekside West, Inc. 50% 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 1998 Barron Collier III Irrevocable Children's Trust 17.5661 1 % R. Blakeslee Gable 15.90492% M. Wells Gable 15.90492% Juliet C. Sproul Family Inheritance Trust 14.38303% Christopher Villere 8.90424% Lamar Villere 8.90424% Mathilde V. Currence 8.90424% Phyllis G. Alden 6.34522% Jennifer S. Sullivan .94653% Juliet A. Sproul .94653% Katherine G. Sproul .94653% Juliet C. Sproul .34348% General Partner Immokalee Retail, LLC 50% 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Daniel Hughes and Beth Hughes, as 35.126% tenants by the entireties Thomas Londres 20.500% Stephen Niggeman 20.500% Paul Rumley 10.000% Daniel Brickner 8.874% Joseph Dougherty 5.000% February 13, 2018 Page 1 of 1 Exh 11 Disclosure Form 6r"id,v 41ijlo fl,I1 n.¢fzr,, eI -da ��r.,e} ... ,-.I --i ..os. k t,4,�•a.: Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Exhibit III.A Legal Description Parcel 1: (Parcel ID: 37698360002) The North 180 feet of Tract No. 116, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 2: (Parcel ID: 37698440003) Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS that portion taken for road right of way pursuant to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3111, Page 500, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: A Portion of Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence South 01 °30' 15" East, for a distance of 172.46 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears South 88°32'50" West, a distance of 2,814.93 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,814.93 feet, through a central angle of 03°12'32", subtended by a chord of 157.83 feet at a bearing of South 00°09'06" West, for an arc length of 157.65 feet to the end of said curve, and the Southeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence North 89°40'50" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 118, for a distance of 50.10 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 8751'02" West, a distance of 2,769.79 feet therefrom; thence run Northerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,769.79 feet, through a central angle of 03°38'39", subtended by a chord of 176.14 feet at a bearing of North 00° 19'38" East, for an arc length of 176.17 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 01°30'15" West, for a distance of 153.94 feet; thence South 89°40'50" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract 118, for a distance of 49.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel 3: (Parcel ID: 37698480005) All of Tract 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS the Easterly 49.00 feet taken for road right of way pursuant to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3111, Page 500, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 4: (Parcel ID: 37698520004) Tract 120, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, pages 83 and 84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, Less the Easterly 49.00 feet as described in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 3111, page 485 and Stipulated Final Judgment recorded in Official Records Book 3431, page 993. Consisting of 20 acres, more or less. December 4, 2019 Page 1 of 1 IR15PUD Exhibit IIIA-rev3.docx © GradyMinor 001 Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL2O160000221) Exhibit IV.B Amendment Language Policy 1.1.2: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Mal-IIr_NMVKIIOI I MA In001MAIED]MIS Iilk] a]I *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Estates — Commercial District [beginning page 30] *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 8. Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is aaaroximately 20± acres in size and is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, north of Randall Boulevard and south of Oil Well Road. The Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict is intended to provide a variety of retail and office land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable uses shall be limited to those permitted by right and by conditional uses in the C-4, Commercial General zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. d. Development is limited to a maximum intensitv of 200.000 sauare feet of Bross floor area. December 6, 2019 Page 1 of 1 IR15PUD Exhibit IVB-rev3.docx © GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects EXHIBIT IV.D. PROPOSED GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP MIXED USE DISTRICT R. ., MIDED DISTRICT O R.w saeriavNr �,M O R.1— E,NI., s.va 1 ORxia,nuei Dens 6anaz CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL. FEATURES mew's.m�smn -Nco 00mooe <eca,szwmm� sem NmrAmwv O.en, 4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CIAL DISTRICT COMMEpm,.�.m, � IIII■�e„ao�a.,m�mm„wI,U„,mN s son,s.�co11C.1,s�wa,.n � �mmwa.e ou,s�ma SITE IROAD-ESTATES 1 COMMERCIALSUBDISTRICT = 20±ACRES O U K FGERD U PINE R GREEN BLVD y ZO� A DAVIS BLVD S.R. 84 a co RATTLE$ MOCK RD H h F— N 0 0.5 1 2 3 Mile BLVD INTERSTATE 76 GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-FEBRARY. 1991 AMENDED -MAY 19, 1992 AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 20D7 ORD. NO. 2007-77 AMENDED-0 TOSER 14. 2008 ORD. NO, 2008-M AMENDED - MAY 25, 1993 AMENDED-JULY27. 199S AMENDED -JULY 28. 2010 ORD. NO. 2010-31 AMENDED-APRIL 12, 1994 AMENDED - MARCH 14. 1— AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 ORD. NO. 2010-32 MENDESEPTEMBER 14, 2011 oRDD. NO. 2011=20 AMENDED- NOVEMBER 18,2014 ORD. NO. 201441 AMENDED-OCTOBER 27, 1997 AMENDED-APRIL 11. 19 98 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8. 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUARV 23, 1999 AMENDED - MAY 9, 2000 AMENDED- NOVEMBER 10. 2015 ORD. NO. 2015-U - AMENDED MAT 10, 2016 ORD. NO. 2016-12 AMENDED - MARCH 13. 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14. 2002 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 ORD. NO. 200314 AMENDED-OCTOBER 26, 2064 ORD. NO. 2004-it AMENDED-JANUARV25, 2005 ORD. NO. 200_ AMENDED-JANUARY 25. 2007 ORo. NO. — -19 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD INTERSTATE 75 R26E R27E R28E R29E EXHIBIT IV.E MMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida ADOPTED (Ord. No. — ??, 20 20—= ??) 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. LEGEND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES -IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT SETTLEMENT AREA PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: ???????? DATE: ??/?? rt' ~ NF V OIL WELL ROAD fir' 1 ll,� '1AitK D m . o e A �, , • �' a Nt . • �! . �'� � F' i 900 FOOT RADIUS • �� ZONED: E r USE: UNDEVELOPED _ ,f � =-«� � �• � � - e ,�,�,� ems; S., ZONED: f,t hti ZONED:E �. USE: RESIDENTIAL ORANGE TREE UD USE: E: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: �.i - USE: 9 RESIDENTIAL SUBJECT }T •.. 'TM_ _ j ZONED: E y Y USE: RESIDENTIALAND f { f UNDEVELOPED ZONED: E USE: UNDEVELOPED • err h. ' SUBJECT PROPERTY -20l ACRES - i EXISTINGZONING: E,ESTATES _ EXISTING FLUE: ESTATES, MIXED USE DISTRICT -' EXISTING USE: UNDEVELOPED ' ADJACENT PROPERTY h NORTH ZONING: E,ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED SOUTH ,^ ..A ZONING: E, ESTATES RANDALL BOULEVARD' A USE: RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED EAST ZONING: ORANGE TREE MPUD USE: ROW, RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL WEST ZONING: E,ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL LEGEND ®GradyMinor CINI En glneers cLanO Surveyors Planners LanOsnape Archl[ects ZONED: ORANGE TREE MPUD USE: ROW AND 9 UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL /s •' fqf Y y � N 0 200' 400' l lxl7 SCALE: 1" = 400' EXHIBIT V.A. LAND USE DATE AERIAL FLOWN: JAN 2017 _ P 1 VO �I EXHIBIT V.B. EXISTING GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP MIXED USE DISTRICT MIDED DISTRICT O R.w saeriavNr �,M R. ., O R.1— E,NI., s.va 1 ORxia,nuei Dens 6anaz CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL. FEATURES mew's.m�smn -Nco 00mooe <eca,szwmm� sem NmrAmwv D.en, 4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CIAL DISTRICT COMMEpm,.�.m, � IIII■�e„ao�a.,m�mm„wI,U„,mN s son,s.�co11C.1,s�wa,.n � �mmwa.e ou,s�ma SITE ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, 1 RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT = 20±ACRES O U K FGERD U PINE R GREEN BLVD y ZO� A DAVIS BLVD S.R. 84 a co RATTLE$ MOCK RD H h F— N 0 0.5 1 2 3 Mile BLVD INTERSTATE 76 GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED-FEBRARY. 1991 AMENDED -MAY 19, 1992 AMENDED - DECEMBER 4, 30D7 ORD. NO. 2007-77 AMENDED-0 TOSER 14. 2008 ORD. NO, 2008-M AMENDED - MAY 25, 1993 AMENDED-JULY27. 199S AMENDED -JULY 28. 2010 ORD. NO. 2010-31 AMENDED-APRIL 12, 1994 AMENDED- MARCH 14. 1995 AMENDED - JULY 28, 2010 ORD. NO. 2010-32 MENDED - SEPTEMBER 14. 2011 oRD. NO. 2011=20 AMENDED- NOVEMBER 18,2014 ORD. NO. 201441 AMENDED-OCTOBER 21, 1997 AMENDED-APRIL 11. 19 98 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 8. 1998 AMENDED - FEBRUARV 23, 1999 AMENDED - MAY 9, 2000 AMENDED- NOVEMBER 10. 2015 ORD. NO. 2015-U - AMENDED MAT 10, 2016 ORD. NO. 2016-12 AMENDED - MARCH 13. 2001 AMENDED - MAY 14. 2002 AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 10, 2053 ORD. NO. 200344 AMENDED-OCTOBER 26, 2064 ORD. NO. 2004-it AMENDED-JANUARV25, 2D05 ORD. NO. 200_ AMENDED-JANUARY 25. 2007 ORo. NO. zoo?-19 GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE RD OIL WELL RD INTERSTATE 75 R26E R27E R28E R29E PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY - UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PREPARED BY: PENINSULA ENGINEERING 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 SEPTEMBER 2019 r PENINSULA F-kic"INIFFPIN1c IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA BRUCE LAYMAN, CE, PWS PENINSULA ENGINEERING\A IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................3 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey....................................................................................................................3 2.2. Listed Plant Survey........................................................................................................................4 2.3. Habitat/Wetland Mapping............................................................................................................4 3. SURVEY RESULTS...................................................................................................................................5 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed/Identified On Site.....................................................................5 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed On -Site But With Potential to Occur On Site...................5 3.3. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site.......................................................................................... 7 3.4. Habitat/Wetland Mapping............................................................................................................ 7 4. SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................7 5. REFERENCES CITED................................................................................................................................8 TABLES Table 1 - Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details.............................................................................. 10 Table 2 - Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed.................................................................................10 Table 3 - Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed..........................................................................................11 Table 4 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species .......................... 11 Table 5 - Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species .......................... 12 Table 6 - Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses........................................................................ 12 APPENDICES Appendix A - Existing Vegetation Association & Land Use Descriptions FIGURES Figure 1— Existing Conditions 3 P:\Active_Projects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m moka lee_Randal_Curve\Reports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 1. INTRODUCTION Peninsula Engineering (PE) entered into an agreement with BCHD Partners I LLC (BCHD) to provide environmental services associated with a 19-acre parcel known as the Immokalee Road —Estates Commercial Subdistrict parcel. The Project Site is located in Section 22; Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The parcel is bordered on the north and south by undeveloped land, on the east Immokalee Road and high -density residential development, and on the west by estate -style residential development. The site is almost entirely forested, contains low to moderate exotic vegetation coverage, and historical hydrology has been adversely affected by regional development. This protected species survey was conducted, and the results summarized herein, to support local, state, and federal environmental permitting. 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY Bruce Layman, Ecologist with PE, conducted a listed species survey consistent with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission standards on the subject property during September 2018. The dates, times and weather conditions are summarized in Table 1. Due to the passage of 12 months, the survey was updated in September 2019 to determine whether site conditions remained consistent with those observed in September 2018. The following information describes the methodologies employed: 2.1. Listed Wildlife Survey Prior to conducting the listed species surveys, color aerial imagery and FLUCCS mapping from prior environmental reconnaissance were reviewed to anticipate which habitats may be present. Additionally, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) Wildlife Occurrence (WildObs) data base was queried to identify documented listed plant and wildlife occurrences within a 5-mile radius of the project site. The 2013 FWC data base, updated in 2017, showed no listed species occurrence records within 5 miles of the project. Additionally, the FWC Florida panther telemetry data base, through 2014, showed no panther telemetry points within 1 mile of the project. Various publications and databases were also reviewed to identify listed plant and wildlife species that are regionally present and that could occur and those habitat types. Based on the habitat types identified on site, and the noted data sources, a preliminary list of state and federal listed flora and fauna that could occur on the project site was generated to help focus survey effort. FWC's Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (FWC, 2016) was used to determine the "listed" state and federal status designation of wildlife species. The field survey consisted of one ecologist performing east/west parallel meandering pedestrian transects spaced approximately 50 to 120 feet on center based on habitat type and visibility limits. These transects are illustrated on Figure 1 entitled Existing Conditions. Additional wandering transects were conducted on successive days, and during the species survey update, to augment survey coverage and increase the opportunity to observe wildlife. Wandering transects are not shown. The field observer was equipped with a compass, GPS, color aerial, wildlife and plant identification books, binoculars, and a field notebook. During pedestrian transects, the ecologist periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, signs of wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Due to habitats present and likelihood of occurrence (not to the exclusion of other potential listed species), the ecologist specifically surveyed for the potential presence of 4 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and trees containing cavities that could have been potentially created by the red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) or could be used by the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus; FBB) for roosting. Given the nature of the parcel, the ecologist is anticipated to have directly observed greater than 70% of the parcel. If observed, the approximate location of observed listed wildlife species and their numbers were mapped on an aerial and recorded in a field notebook. The locations of fixed resources, such as gopher tortoise burrows or cavity trees were recorded using hand-held GPS and flagged with high -visibility survey ribbon. Non -listed wildlife species were recorded daily. 2.2. Listed Plant Survey Over the course of conducting surveys for listed wildlife, the PE ecologist searched for plants listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). These agencies have categorized the various plant species based upon their relative abundance in natural communities. Those categorizations include "Endangered", "Threatened", and "Commercially Exploited". The protection afforded plants listed solely by FDA entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. Unless the sale of plants is involved, there are no restrictions for landowners to impact such plants. These provisions are found in Section 581.185, FDA under State law. 2.3. Habitat/Wetland Mapping The habitat and wetland survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation communities, land forms, preliminary state/federal wetland limits, and land uses present on the project site. A FLUCCS Map for the project site is provided as Figure 1 entitled Existing Conditions. The methods and class descriptions found in the FLUCCS manual (FDOT, 1999) were followed when delineating and assigning areas to an appropriate FLUCCS category (class) or "codes". Plant communities and preliminary wetland limits were mapped using the standard state and federal wetland delineation methodologies and direct field observations and aerial photo interpretation. Color aerial photos were plotted at 1" = 50' scale and were used in the field to map the vegetative communities on the site. An important factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion by the exotic plant species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). Four levels of exotic density are typically recognized. Code modifiers may be appended to the base FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic vegetation in the canopy or understory, as follows: EO = Exotics <10% E1 = Exotics 10-24% E2 = Exotics 25-49% E3 = Exotics 50-75% E4 = Exotics 75<% 5 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 3. SURVEYRESULTS 3.1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed/Identified On Site No state -listed or federally -listed wildlife species were observed on site during the 2018 listed species survey. Observations made during the September 2019 listed species survey update reflect that site conditions had not changed from those observed in 2018. Therefore, findings of the 2018 survey remain consistent with present site conditions. The project site contained no US Fish and Wildlife Service -designated listed species critical habitat. All non -listed wildlife species, either directly observed or audibly detected on site, are listed in Table 3. Signs observed in the field (scat, clawed trees), photographic eyewitness accounts of an adult bear on adjacent property from neighbors, and direct on -site observation of a juvenile bear, confirm that bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) occasionally occur on site. Though the black bear is no longer listed as protected, the FWC is likely to suggest conservation measures, during the state Environmental Resource Permitting Process, to protect the species. 3.2. Listed Wildlife Species Not Observed But With Potential to Occur On Site The following is a discussion of listed wildlife species that were not observed during either survey, but which are considered to have potential to occur due to the presence of suitable habitat, confirmed sightings in the region, or the parcel's being located within the consultation area for a given species. Species with greater than zero potential to occur on site are summarized in Table 4. The parcel falls within the consultation areas of both the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescens) and the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis). Since the parcel does not contain habitat that is reasonably suitable for use by either species, these are not considered potential users of the site. The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is listed as Threatened by the FWC and it is not listed by FWS. Given the presence of pine flatwoods on site, this species was considered to be potentially present. No signs of the species (i.e., burrows, scat) were observed during the listed species survey and they are no longer considered a candidate to occur on site. The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia; BCFS) is listed as Threatened by FWC and its distribution is believed to be limited to an area south of the Caloosahatchee River and west to the Everglades. The BCFS is usually associated with FLUCCS codes 411, 621, and 624 and prefers habitats with open park -like mid -story and groundcover strata. Such areas on site are small and isolated. Since site conditions are not conducive to use by this species and no evidence of the BCFS (i.e., direct sightings, nests, day beds, etc.) was observed on site during the survey, it is anticipated that the potential for this species to occur on site is near zero. Due to the presence of on -site wetlands, a suite of listed wading birds could potentially use the site to forage. It includes the wood stork (Mycteria americana), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), and reddish egret (Egretta rufescens). These species could opportunistically forage in the wetland; however, the existing density of midstory and groundcover vegetation make it less likely. No wading bird rookeries were observed on site, nor are any known to be on adjacent properties. The site falls within the core foraging area (18.6 miles) of at least three (3) wood stork 6 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA colonies. The red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis, RCW) is listed as Endangered by FWS and the project site is located on the periphery of the FWS consultation area for this species. No RCW cavity trees were observed on site during the listed species survey, nor were any RCW vocalizations detected. Though the slash pine trees could be used for foraging if an RCW clan was regionally present, RCW clans typically require hundreds of contiguous acres of pine forest for foraging and nesting. With the nearest RCW occurrence record being 7 — 9 miles southwest of the project site in proximity to City Gate (per the FWC RCW occurrence data base), it appears that there is little reasonable potential for the RCW to use the pine flatwood habitat present on site. The Florida panther (Felis concolorcoryi) is listed as Endangered by FWS and the site falls within Secondary panther habitat. Per the FWC data base, a single panther telemetry point was located 0.2 miles north of the project site in 2014. It was associated with a 2.5-year-old male that subsequently died that year several miles to the south of unknown causes. Except for this dispersing male, the void of panther telemetry points within one mile of the project, and the closest four points ranging between 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 miles of the project (in 1995, 1998, and 2002, respectively), suggests that the project site is not likely part of a panther travel corridor or an active home range for any collared individuals. The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus; FBB) is listed as Endangered by FWS and the site falls within the FWS consultation area for this species. There is relatively little known about the life -history needs of the species; however, it has been suggested in the literature that roosts may be a limiting resource for this bat. As such, the ecologist specifically searched for trees with cavities that could potentially be used as roosts by the FBB. The site contained numerous pines that had recently died, presumably due to stress resulting from Hurricane Irma and subsequent beetle infestation. However, few contained woodpecker cavities and the cavities that were present were either shallow or of small diameter and none exhibited signs of use by bats such as smudging or the presence of guano. Therefore, lacking sufficient cavity size and signs of use, it appears unlikely that the observed cavities are used by the FBB for roosting. No other tree cavities were observed on site. Given that the FBB is known to travel great distances to forage, and given the proximity of the site to large forested areas to the north that may contain natural roosts, it is assumed that FBB's roosting regionally would have the potential to commute or forage over the parcel. The Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) is listed as Endangered by FWS. Indigo snakes inhabit pine forests, hardwood hammocks, scrub and other uplands. They also rely heavily on a variety of wetland habitats for feeding and temperature regulation needs. Though none were observed on site, it is typically assumed by FWS that there is potential for this species to be present. Adhering to the FWS standard Eastern Indigo Snake Protection Precautions may be proposed as a means to successfully navigate the federal permitting process. Though the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is not state or federally listed, it is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No eagle nest was observed on site. Per the FWC Eagle Nest Locator website, https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/ nestlocator.aspx), the nearest known eagle nest (nest C0045) is located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the parcel. The site is located well beyond the protection zones of that nest. 7 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSU77k ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 3.3. Listed Plant Species Observed On Site Three (3) species of listed plants (per the FDA list) were observed on site during the field survey. The species observed were the stiff -leafed wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), Northern needleleaf (Tillandsia balbisiana), and the butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis). Wild pine was relatively abundant; however, the butterfly orchid was limited to a single small plant. They were typically located on pine and cypress trees. No plant species listed by FWS were observed during the field surveys. The listed plant species observed, and their state and federal listing status, are provided in Table 2. 3.4. Habitat/Wetland Mapping Natural areas of the project site are comprised primarily of pine flatwood, cypress, and pine - cypress -cabbage palm communities. All three communities on site, totaling 19.38 acres, fit Collier County's definition of native habitat. The FLUCCS code for each community along with a brief description and acreage are provided in Table 6 and a detailed description of each FLUCCS code is provided in Appendix A. Historic on -site hydrology appears to be adversely affected as a result of surrounding development. Based upon current field conditions, and application of state and federal wetland delineation methodologies, it is estimated that there are approximately 2.96 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on site. This area, mapped as FLUCCS 621-Cypress on the Existing Conditions figure, has not been verified by either the South Florida Water Management District or the U.S. Corps of Engineers. Verification will take place during environmental permit review. 4. SUMMARY Observations made during the September 2019 listed species survey update reflect that site conditions had not changed from those observed in 2018. Therefore, findings of the 2018 survey remain consistent with present site conditions. Results of both surveys reflect a lack of state or federally listed wildlife and a lack of federally - listed plant species. The protection afforded the FDA -listed stiff -leaved wild pine, Northern needleleaf, and butterfly orchid observed on site entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from FDA. There are no restrictions for landowners unless the sale of plants is involved. It will likely be assumed by FWS during the federal permitting process that there is potential for the Eastern indigo snake to occur on site. Similarly, based upon current FWS procedure, it will also likely be assumed by FWS that the project may affect the bonneted bat since the project is over 5 acres in size and more than one acre of bonneted bat habitat will be adversely affected. Adhering to the FWS standard Eastern Indigo Snake Protection Precautions, and providing project -specific data documenting the lack of on -site bonneted bat roosting activity, are likely to sufficiently address FWS' concerns in order to successfully navigate the federal permitting process. Though not listed by either FWC or FWS, the black bear may come up as a point of discussion during the state Environmental Resource Permitting process. Measures to educate the end user of the land, and protection of the bear during and after construction, are likely to be addressed at that time. 8 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA This assessment anticipates that there are approximately 2.96 acres of state and federal jurisdictional wetlands on site. The wetlands will have to be addressed during the state environmental permitting process, and they may be addressed in the federal Section 404 process if impacts are proposed to these areas. 5. REFERENCESCITED Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2013. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species, Official List. Tallahassee, Florida. Weaver, R.E. and P.J. Anderson. 2010. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants. Contribution No. 38, 5th edition. 9 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_I m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA IFNGINFFRINC_ �+ IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TABLES 10 P:\Active_Projects\P-H LST-006\002_ACOE_SFWM D_Permitting\Design_Perm it\Submitta ls\SFWMD '7%� ENGINEERINGA IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 1: Listed Species and Vegetation Survey Details Ecologist Date Time of Day Weather Field Hours Bruce Layman 9/12/18 7:45 a.m. -1:30 p.m. 76°, partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 5.75 Bruce Layman 9/13/18 7:15 a.m. -10:00 a.m. 78% partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.75 Bruce Layman 9/14/18 7:15 a.m. -10:00 a.m. 74°, partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.75 Bruce Layman 9/17/18 4:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. 94% partly cloudy, wind 0 mph 2.50 Bruce Layman 9/19/18 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. 92°, clear, wind 0 mph 2.00 Bruce Layman 9/05/19 8:00 a.m. — 2:30 p.m. 77°, clear, wind 0 mph 6.50 Total Hours 22.25 Table 2: Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name Habitat Where Observed By FWCCS FWC Status FWS Status FDA Status PLANTS Stiff -leaved wild -pine Tillandsiafasciculata 411, 624D, 621 N/A NL E Butterfly orchid Encyclia tamepensis 411 N/A NL CE Northern needleleaf Tillandsia balbisiana 624D N/A NL T WILDLIFE Florida black bear* Ursus americanus floridanus 411, 624D, 621 NL NL N/A FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish & Wildlife Service CE = Commercially Exploited T = Threatened E = Endangered NL = Not Listed N/A = Not Applicable * = Not listed by FWC or FWS, but protection measures typical 11 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its '7%� ENGINEERINGA IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 3: Non -listed Wildlife Species Observed Common Name Scientific Name BIRDS Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Blue -gray gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea Red -bellied woodpecker Centurus carolinus Blue jay Cyanocitta cristata Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Barred owl Strixvaria AMPHIBIANS & REPTILES Cuban anole Anolis s. sagrei Southern black racer Coluber constrictor Water moccasin Agkistrodon piscivorus MAMMALS Nine -banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus Eastern gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Florida black bear* Ursus americanus floridanus Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus *Species not directly observed. Signs of species presence observed (e.g., burrow, tracks, scat, remains, etc.) Table 4: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Faunal Species Estimated Occurrence* Status Common Name Scientific Name (FWC/FWS) Habitat by FLUCCS Probable Possible Unlikely BIRDS Listed wading birds various X 621 Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E/E X 411 Bald eagle** Haliaeetus leucocephalus NL X 411, 621, 624 MAMMALS Florida panther Felis concolor coryi E/E X 411, 621, 624 Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T/NL X 411, 621, 624 Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E/E X 411, 621, 624 REPTILES Eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi T/T X 411, 621, 624 FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service FDA = Food and Drug Administration SSC = Species of Special Concern T =Threatened E = Endangered C = Commercially Exploited NL = Not listed * Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. ** There is potential for an eagle to construct a nest on site at a later date, though the probability is low. 12 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its '7%� ENGINEERINGA IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Table 5: Estimated Probability of Occurrence of Non -Observed Listed Floral Species Common Name Scientific Name Status (FDA/FWS) Estimated Occurrence* Habitat by FLUCCS Probable Possible Unlikely Giant wild pine Tillandsia utriculata E/NL X 621, 624D FWC = Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service FDA = Food and Drug Administration 5SC = Species of Special Concern T =Threatened E = Endangered C = Commercially Exploited NIL = Not listed * Probable Occurrence = >50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Possible Occurrence = <50% estimated chance of occurrence on site. Unlikely Occurrence = <5% estimated chance of occurrence on site. There is potential for an eagle to construct a nest on site at a later date, though the probability is low. Table 6: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Uses FLUCCS CODE FLUCCS DESCRIPTION East Parcel Acres 411 Pine Flatwoods, Palmetto understory 9.39 621 Cypress 2.96 624D Pine -Cypress -Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 7.03 814 Roads and Highways 0.20 OTAL 19.58 13 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its PENINSU77k ENGINEERINGA IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA APPENDIX A Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Descriptions 14 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mo ka lee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Re ports PENINSULA ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Existing Vegetative Association & Land Use Detailed Descriptions Pine Flatwoods — Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS 411) — This community is dominated in the canopy by slash pine (Pinus elliotti), with a minor component of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and cypress (Taxodium distichum). The midstory includes live oak (Quercus virginiana), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), and stunted cypress. Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) is scattered and represents a dominant species in the groundcover. Other species include beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), Caesarweed (Urena lobata), love vine (Cassytha filiformis), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). Vines are locally abundant and include muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and cat briar (Smilax rotundifolia). Cypress, Exotics <10% (FLUCCS 621E0) - This community is dominated in the canopy by cypress, with red maple (Acer rubrum), cabbage palms, and melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) as subdominants. The midstory is relatively open and includes red maple, cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), strangler fig (Ficus aurea), max myrtle (Morelia cerifera), and dahoon holly. Groundcover is dominated by locally -abundant swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) with pockets of maidencane (Panicum hemitomon) and beak -rush (Rhynchospora microcarpa). Pine — Cypress — Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (FLUCCS 624D) - This community is dominated in the canopy by slash pine, cabbage palm, ear -leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and minor cypress. The midstory ranges from relatively open to dense with slash pine, earleaf acacia, cocoplum, cypress, and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) dominating. Groundcover includes Caesarweed, cocoplum, beautyberry, swamp fern and chain fern (Woodwardia spp.). Vines are locally abundant and include muscadine grape and cat briar. Roads and Highways (FLUCCS 814) — This represents the maintained shoulder and paved surface of 4t" Street NE, a 2-lane unstriped residential roadway. 15 P:\Active_P roj ects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mo ka lee_Ra nd a I_Cu rve\Re ports PEN INSU ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FIGURE 1 Existing Conditions 16 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its PEN INSU ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA y1 1 � I ! I z t— it 0 50, 100, 20C' 400' 600, LEGEND PARCEL BOUNDARY ..---- MEANDERING PEDESTRIAN TRANSECT(APPROX.) FLUGGS LIMITS PRELIMINARY WETLANDS (NOT AGENCY REVIEWED OR APPROVED PROJECT: IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATE COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT DESCRIPTION AREAPINE DE FLATWOODS 9.39 R CYPRESS 296 PINE -CYPRESS -CABBAGE PALM,pISTURBED��ROADS AND HIGHWAYS 0.20 19.58 EXISTING BCHD PARTNERS I, CONDITIONS I LLC SEC: 32 TW1- RGE: 2]E ➢..igneh by: .-E LAYMAN ➢rewn by: ANTON SCNAFFER Gate: SEPTEMBER 201E oraw�nB snaia: r=zoo' Pmjecl Number: P-BCHD-003-001 FIIa Number. P-BCHD-003-001-X01 c-xol 17 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its PEN INSU ENGINEERING IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT LISTED SPECIES SURVEY -UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA y1 1 � I ! I z t— it 0 50, 100, 20C' 400' 600, LEGEND PARCEL BOUNDARY ..---- MEANDERING PEDESTRIAN TRANSECT(APPROX.) FLUGGS LIMITS PRELIMINARY WETLANDS (NOT AGENCY REVIEWED OR APPROVED PROJECT: IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATE COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT DESCRIPTION AREAPINE DE FLATWOODS 9.39 R CYPRESS 296 PINE -CYPRESS -CABBAGE PALM,pISTURBED��ROADS AND HIGHWAYS 0.20 19.58 EXISTING BCHD PARTNERS I, CONDITIONS I LLC SEC: 32 TW1- RGE: 2]E ➢..igneh by: .-E LAYMAN ➢rewn by: ANTON SCNAFFER Gate: SEPTEMBER 201E oraw�nB snaia: r=zoo' Pmjecl Number: P-BCHD-003-001 FIIa Number. P-BCHD-003-001-X01 c-xol 17 P:\Active_P rojects\P-BCH D-003\001_1 m mokalee_Ra nda I_Cu rve\Repo its COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY AT 13301-13699 IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA August 27, 2019 Prepared for BCHD Partners I LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Prepared by sell Planning- k— i..-Results Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.com Background BCHD Partners I LLC ("Client") is submitting a Collier County Growth Management Plan ("GMP") amendment to change the zoning on four parcels totaling 19.58 +/- acres located at 13301-13699 Immokalee Road across from the Orange Tree subdivision and approximately a half mile south of Oil Well Road and % miles north of Randall Boulevard in Collier County, Florida. The property is located within the Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Sub -District and is currently zoned E, Estates. The Client is seeking to change the Future Land Use Element ("FLUM") to Estates Designation, Commercial District, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Sub -District. The Client is interested in developing the property as a C-4 Commercial site including 200,000 square feet of various uses as permitted in the C-4 designation ("Subject Property"). The Client has retained Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") to prepare a Commercial Needs Analysis to determine the potential for developing the various C-4 uses on the Subject Site as required by the Collier County Future Land Use Element ("FLUE"). The FLUE requires a commercial needs analysis ("Study") with the submittal of a commercial rezone within a Mixed -Use Activity Center. The proposed Sub district is not located within an Activity Center. Therefore, Collier County staff has requested a commercial needs analysis. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing real estate needs analysis and market studies especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. This Study is comprised of four parts; the site assessment, population growth around the subject property, the market supply and demand analysis, and conclusions. 1.0 Site Assessment 1.1 Subject Property Attributes The Subject Property is located on the west side of Immokalee Road, across from the Orange Tree subdivision and approximately a half mile south of Oil Well Road and 3/4 miles north of Randall Boulevard, in Section 22 — Township 48 — Range 72. An aerial locator photo in Figure 1.1.1 is followed by a summary of the Subject Property's legal, location, zoning, and land use attributes obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser website. Parcel 1 P-pertys--y Parcel Ne 3TM5200M Sit¢ Adtlrr=5'Disclaimer She Uty Si. Z9ee'N9m Name / Atltlr.ss BCND PARTNER91 LLf 26M GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAMS GEN— City NAPL£5 State FL Zip 34105 Map Na. 3C23 5emp No. —S. 12003C22 —6— T9weship 23 48 Range Aries •Esdmeted 27 5.54 Lega! GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 120 LESS TNAT PORTION FOR R/IY A$ DE5C IN OR 3111 PG 415. MlRaee Area O 265 Millsee Rees 0 `fetalmierta Sub.ffinde 332500 - GOLDEN GATE EST DNIT 22 Snhd,J .0,. T-1 Dx fed.0 0-VACANTRFSIDENTIAL 5.OB3 3.5ST1 13.6401 Latest Sales History 2019 Preliminary Tax Roll xesu e. me n suero cenriemeeliryl Iwgeesnea.ngo Dale leak -Page Amovra IaPtl Va]ue 3153.735 Od/29/19 5623-39)) 5500,000 +I Impraned Value $0 03/01/R] 09/01/8fi 1151-IR53 21 SO 330,000 c-1 Madut Value $ 153.735 09/01/Rfi 1j)T-�'e SO I -I 10%Cep 995,828 O9/Ot/Rf 1 t SO I=1 —.—I W.. $57.907 1=1 5 —I T bk Value $ 153.735 1=i T b1a Yalu. II all WNN 1Mea—p 19.11-1—[rnt —IM f5N11RR.11 $ 5].90T Parcel 2 Fmperty Summary ®®® Parf.l N. 31690400-DS 511. Add--01nda'me She Ohy She Z.--tlme Name/ Address BCHD PARTNERS I LLC 260D GOLDEN GATE PRWT City NAPLES S.. FL Zip 31105 Map N., 3— Strap N.. 3325M 119 A-2 —I.. T .Aip 22 48 Range Acros `Eatmat.d 27 S.62 L.g.l GOLDEN GATE EST UNU 22 TR 113, LERS THE EASSERLT d9 Fi FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PO 0S00 Mill". A— 285 Mfthq awes* •filrulaelerts Suh./fnMe 332500- G.WrN GATE EST UNIT R2 soled Orher Tesal lHe Cedes 0- VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.083 8.5571 13.E401 Latest Sales History 2019 Preliminary Tax Roil INee.l an= u.w[en6awhWkyl I 1e mp.l Dme leek -Page A..— Land V.I— S IS%- 02/19/ffi 5293.2W6 51,6ss.000 1,I Im'—d V.]U $0 as/te/ts 12/17/14 11 -Z22 511]_166a 5 134,111 $0 1-I M.Ne<Ya1ue 5155.955 0]/2d/01 _ ull-26Ti 50 I -I f0%tap 121.591 05116/01 2625.2d02 90-1 Assessed Yalu. 6133.98A e2/12T01 UU-U44 5IS,— _I Sloe. Talcable Va I.. S 155,955 OT/24/8T 12&1-]22 5I%— 1_I T—.Yalu. I5 all Valun rM1Own chew pual9lki. pml wx erase a.ar Vn Final Ta. Roll $133,964 3 Parcel 3 Propeny Summary®� Parcel N. 3769RA40003 Skl Address •OkdAlmer Ske Chy Sloe Zane `Nero Namel Add rcss OCHO PARTNERS ILLC . OAYIO GENSON 01y NAPLES Skate FL 21p 36105 Map N.. 3C22 Shay N., 33250011. a3C22 Section 22 T nship Range Acres 'EsOn�ated 6fi 2] 5.fi9 L.gal GOLDEN GATE CST ONN 22 TR 1 TB OR 1106 PG W 3, LL55 THAT PORTION FOR R]Ve Millaae .O 285 Ml11 —0—kubtlew fiub./rarrd. 3325M GOLDEN GATE EST ONM 22 5rheal Dthr TAW Nse CedeU 0-VACANT RESIOENTI6L 5.083 8.5511 1-.1 Latest Sales History rxa1. .. ar.n .eam mnAeml�myl 2019 Preliminary Tax Roll i Ne Dale aaak-Page A..— IAnd Yo1.. � g. 515],898 02/1Br1. 52d,3- — 5 1.fi98.L00 - Imp1wld Value $ 0 O6/IR/15 l l/0]/08 5165-2486 aa0s.l Ba $ ]43,600 $ lO _I Alalker ySuq $ 157,698 1 Oy0F/86 ity6, _Y2-3 $8.500 I� 1Ovn Cap 522266 10/O4/86 l 10fi-402 S 0 I-� 45sessed Value f 135,fi32 �-� Sd.00 Taxabe yal,.e L15],696 y Tnaabl. V.I. S 135,632 Parcel 4 Property Summary ��� Para.I Ne 3T69936BDB2 s„l Addurs•Disd.imer su City 11'. mn. Neu Name] Address OCHO PARTNERS I LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PALYT CHy NAPLES State FL Zip 36105 Map Na. 3C22 Sbap No. 3325M 116 13C22 Section 22 T—hip Range Acres 'Ee1'mated 68 27 2.]3 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST ONR22N 180FTOETR 116OR 29-62 MtRdp9 ir9d.n 285 Mill_wRaLrO T[3f{V1iiiRns Sub./—e 332SO0-GOLU£NGATEESTDNIT22 Sehml Otlrw T-1 U—Ced.d G-VACANTRESIOENTIAL 5.083 B.SS)1 13.6d01 Latest Sales History 2019 Preliminary Tax Roil Ixee rl sere n ousts [enrt.xmaiiryl Isu6leetr aanpel Dab Beek-Pag. A --land Value S64, 394 02/19/1. 52d3-2T4fi 81,fi59,000 Sri Improved Yalw SO OB]21/15 51B]-56 S 65.000 I_I —ke d— 5 fid,39d I=I Assessed Yelue 948iROT I-1 5[hwl TaRahl! Value -i Taxable Value 1.2 Location Analysis The Subject Property's strategic location allows reasonable access to the site and provides for an ideal location for commercial activities. As noted above, the Subject Property is strategically located to accommodate the proposed C-4 commercial use. The commercial offerings will have high visibility to Immokalee Road. Figure 1.1.1 previously shows the location of the property. 2.0 Population Growth Around Subject Property 2.1 Overview of Florida Population Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 19.1 million people according to the Census Bureau. By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 23.6 million people according to the medium range series from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research. This represents an increase of 245,000 per year. Florida's population growth is depicted in Figure 2.1.1 below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami -Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Figure 2.1.1 2030 Population Projections by County Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 = 100,000.,1.- O 100,001 - 250,000 _ 250,001 - 500,000 _ 500,001 - 1,000,000 _ 1,000,001 + Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2.2 Overview of Collier County Population Growth. Currently, there are an estimated 373,000 people living year-round in Collier County. Since the 2000 Census, the County's population has increased by nearly 45%, the equivalent of 115,074 new residents as shown in Figure 2.2.1 below. Looking ahead, the County will continue to gain new residents at a rate greater than that of the state of Florida. By the year 2045, the population of Collier County is projected to total 569,322 residents. This is a projected annual growth rate of just over 2% from 2015 to 2040 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 1.08% during the same time period. Figure 2.2.1 Countywide Total Population Growth 2000 2010 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Permanent Population Estimates and Forecasts 257,926 322,653 340,293 347,002 383,166 416,607 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 5-year Percent Increase 7.55% 10.42% 8.73% 7.12% 8.45% 8.45% 8.45% 2.14% = Average Annual Growth Rate between 2015 and 2045 8.45% = Average 5-Year Growth between 2010 and 2030 to forecast 2035-2045 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 14, 2018 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Population growth in Collier County is primarily due to the in -migration of the ongoing arrival of baby boomer retirees. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age peaks in 2020. (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 6 2.3 15-Minute Drive Time Demographic Detail The Urban Land Institute ("ULI") defines commercial shopping centers in three categories. The categories are neighborhood, community and regional. Those categories are characterized by drive times and size in square feet as shown in Table 2.2.1 below. Table 2.2.1 Neighborhood Up to 10-Minute Drive Time = <100,000 Sqft Community 20-30 Minute Drive Time = 100,000 to 300,000 Sqft Regional 30-Minute and over Drive Time = >300,000 Sqft Source: Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008 The Subject Property proposed development plan would categorize it as a medium size Community Center. ULI defines Community Centers in their 2008 Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers as follows: "The community shopping center is a larger than a neighborhood center but with neither a traditional department store nor the trade area of a regional shopping center. It includes traditional community shopping centers, power centers, town centers, lifestyle centers, and outlet/off-price centers that meet these criteria. The average total floor space (GLA and all other floor area) of the community centers in this study is about 192,700 square feet; the median is about 177,328 square feet with 80 percent of the centers between 376,200 and 109,195 square feet in size." Drive time areas are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst program calculates drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits. In general, Neighborhood Centers have a drive time area of up to 10 minutes, Community Centers have a drive time area of 10 to 20 minutes depending on the size and Regional Centers have a drive time area of 30 minutes and over depending on the size. Since the Subject Property is proposed for 150,000 square feet of commercial space, it falls within the Community Center category and the supply/demand analysis will be performed on a 15-minute drive time market area since its size falls in the middle of the Community Center category. 7 The following table shows the U.S. Census demographic profile of the population that lives within the 15-minute drive time of the subject site. Table 2.4.1 (pesri- Demographic an. Income Barron Collier proposed Commercial Site 13301-136991mmokalee Rd, Naples, Florida, Drive Time: 15 minute radius Profile 34120 Prepared by Esrt - _ - Summary Census 2010 2015 2022 Population 41,945 4!1924 57,096 Households 14,918 17,872 20,464 Families 11,704 13,937 13,923 Average Household Size 2.80 2.78 2.78 Owner Occupied Housing Units 11,687 13,547 15,359 Renter Occupied Housing Units 3,031 4,325 5,105 Median Age 40.1 42.6 44.1 Trends: 2017 - 2022 Annual Rate Area State National Population 2.729/b 1.36% 0.83% Households 2J5 % 1.30 % 0.79 % Families 2.70°la 1, 25% 0.71% Owner HHs 2.54% 1.19% 0.72% Median Household Income 2.5Z% 2.13% 2.12% 2015 2022 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent c$15,000 991 5.5% 1,040 5-1% $15,000 - $24,999 1,070 6.0 % 1,041 5.1 % $25OuO-$34,999 1,674 9.4% 1,529 7.5% $35:000 - $49,999 2,200 12.3% 2,050 10.0% $50, 000 - $74,999 3,484 19.5% 3,696 18-1% $75,000 - $99,999 2,769 15.5% 3,652 17.8% $100, COD -$149,999 3,303 Ia.5% 4,3$7 21.3% $150,000 - $1,99,999 1,004 5.6% 1,299 6.3% $200,000+ 1,375 7.7% 1,800 S. Median Household Income $70,256 $79,580 Average Household Income $95,232 $10a, 174 Per Capita Income $34,208 $38,890 Census 2010 2015 2022 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 2,340 5.6 % 2,544 5.1 % 2,797 49% 5-9 2; 993 7.1% 3,166 6.3% 3,399 6.0% 10 - 14 3, 346 8.0% 3,513 7.0% 3,660 6.8% IS - 19 3,233 7J% 3,198 6.0.% 3,439 6.0% 20 - 24 1,925 4.5% 2,369 4.7 % 2,238 3.9% 25-34 4,103 9.8% 5,226 10.5% 5,931 10.4% 35 - 44 6,300 15.0% 6,559 13.1 % 7,597 13.3% 45 - 54 6,380 15.20A 6,747 13,5°70 6,942 1220/, 55-64 5,026 12.0% 6,350 13.7% 7,925 13.9% 65-74 4,195 10.0% 6,422 12.9% 8,218 14.4% 75 - 84 1,775 4.2% 2,725 5.51A 3,911 5.8% 85+ 330 0.S% 605 1.2°/ 839 1.5 % Census 2010 2015 2022 Roca and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Wh1te Alone 35,971 88.1% 43,250 86.6% 48,553 85.2% Black Alone 1, 909 4.6% 2,SW 5.0% 3,195 5.6% American Indian Alone 120 0.3% 145 0.3% 173 0.3% Asian Alone 713 1.7% 1,082 2.2% 1,481 2.6% Pacific 11lender Alone 10 0.0% 14 0.0% 17 OA% Some ether Race Alone 1,417 3.40A 1,826 3.7 % 2,226 3.9% Two or More Races nos 1.9% 1,105 2.2% 1,350 2.4%o Hi spanlc Origin (Any Race) 10,715 25.S% 13,971 27.8% 17,374 30-4% data Note: Income Is expressed In current dollars Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census Z010 Summary File 1. Esri Forecasts fer2015 and 2022. August 26, 2019 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In order to determine commercial demand coming from the 15-minute drive time market area, it is important to determine the ratio between the overall County population and the population in the 15-minute drive time market area. In 2010, the population in the 15-minute drive time market area was 41,495, which was 12.86% of the County population. That percent increased to 14.38% of the County population in 2015. That one and a half percent increase is an indication of the growth potential in the Northeast Naples area due to the large percentage of undeveloped land and the potential for population growth in that area versus the land constrained developed areas of the County. The Consultant conservatively estimates that the Northeast Naples percentage of County population will continue to increase along with the southeast and east County regions due to developable land availability. Therefore, the Consultant used a 1.5% increased growth factor for the future 15-minute drive time area population percentage of the overall County population as shown in Table 2.4.2 below. Table 2.4.2 15-Minute Drive Time Population Forecast Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Collier County GMD Population Forecast 322,653 347,002 --- --- --- --- --- --- 15-Minute Market Area Census Population 41,495 49,924 --- --- --- --- --- --- Share 12.86% 14.39% 15.89% 17.39% 18.89% 20.39% 21.89% 23.39% Collier County GMD Population Forecast 383,166 416,607 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 15-Minute Market Area Census Population 60.874 72.436 84.291 98.678 114.895 133.149 3.0 3.1 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section MARKET ANALYSIS Market Area Demand The most reliable indicator of commercial market demand in the County is to determine the amount of commercial square footage built in the County then divide that total amount by the County population to arrive at square feet per capita (person) in the existing market. Historical commercial development in relation to population growth encompasses all aspects of land development over time including geography, economic fluctuations and various commercial uses as they relate to market demographics. Collier County in particular has shown a propensity for commercial development to follow residential development as the primary economic drivers are tourism, agriculture and real estate construction. The limited economic diversification fuels residential development, which then supports commercial development as peoples moving into the County require goods and services. Therefore, the commercial square feet per capita measure takes into account all of the factors previously mentioned. 10 The Consultant utilized the 2014 commercial inventory spreadsheets by planning area as provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section ("CCCPS") to determine the total amount of commercial square footage built in the County as of 2014. Acreage not built upon was not used in this calculation. In order to make an accurate calculation, the Consultant then used the 2014 Collier County population from the CCCPS to match the supply data and calculate the commercial square footage per capita in the County. The Commercial square foot demand per capita in Collier County is 78.22 as shown in Table 3.1.1 on the next page. Table 3.1.1 Collier County 2014 Planning Area Square Feet Immokalee Area 2,355,554 Marco Island 158,081 Central Naples 2,732,949 Corkscrew 70,748 East Naples 4,244,976 Golden Gate 1,574,301 North Naples 9,726,289 Royal Fakapalm 522,764 Rural Estates 452,781 South Naples 2,277,828 Urban Estates 2,500,631 26,616,902 2015 Population 340,293 (October 1st Fiscal Year) Demand in Square Feet: 78.22 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section To further refine the demand numbers for the Subject Property's particular market area, the Consultant used the 2014 commercial inventory spreadsheet for the Rural Estate and Urban Estates Planning Areas that are covered by the Subject Property's drive time area. The drive time area is located within approximately 80% of the Rural Estates and 20% of the Urban Estates. The Consultant then took 80% of the Rural Estates existing commercial square footage and 20% of the Urban Estates square footage, added them together and divided by the drive time population thus yielding a demand of 17.27 square feet of commercial space per capita as shown in Table 3.1.2 on the next page. Table 3.1.2 Collier County Planning Area 2014 Sq. Ft. Percent Drive Time Sq. Ft. Rural Estates 452,781 80.00% 362,225 Urban Estates 2,500,631 20.00% 500,126 862,351 2015 Drive Time Area Population: 49,924 Per Capita Commercial Square Feet Demand: 17.27 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section and U.S. Census Bureau With the 15-minute drive time market area estimated population and the commercial demand in square -feet per capita determined, the Consultant calculated the estimated commercial square footage demand for the 15-minute drive time market area through the year 2045 as shown in Table 3.1.3 below. Table 3.1.3 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 County Population 381,722 412,522 439,159 474,376 512,418 553,509 15-Minute Drive Time Population 60,874 72,436 84,291 98,678 114,895 133,149 Demand Square Feet Per Capita 17.27 17.27 17.27 17.27 17.27 17.27 Commercial Square Feet Demand 1,051,502 1,251,215 1,455,977 1,704,486 1,984,609 2,299,916 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section and the Consultant 3.2 Market Area Supply The next step in the commercial needs analysis is to determine the amount of existing and potential competing commercial square footage in the 15-minumte drive time market area. The Consultant performed a three-part process in the ARCgis desktop program to determine both the existing and potential competing commercial parcels that would be used in the analysis. The first step in the process is to join all of the Collier County Property Appraiser data with the ARCgis program. The second step is to join the 15-minute drive time market area overlay shape file with the Property Appraiser data. 12 3.3 The final step is to join the Excel commercial inventory data obtained from Collier County Comprehensive Planning Staff with the 15-minute drive time market area. This last step required joining the Rural Estates Planning Area and Urban Estates Planning Area Inventory spreadsheets with the 15-minute drive time market area since the drive time area encompassed portions of the two planning areas. All of the commercial parcels included or excluded within the 15-minute drive time market area are shown in Appendix Tables A through D at the end of this analysis. The Consultant then used a floor area ratio ("FAR") that consists of using all of the commercial square footage built in the drive time market area and dividing that by the developed acreage to obtain an average square footage per acre FAR that is indicative of the true market area supply being developed to meet the commercial demand being generated from the drive time market area. Table 3.2.1 below indicates the total amount of existing and potential commercial square feet in the 15-minute drive time market area. Table 3.2.1 Parcels Acres Square Feet FAR Developed Commercial 33 114.54 725,404 6,333 Undeveloped Commercial 33 110.69 701,063 6,333 Totals 66 225.23 1,426,467 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI ARCgis mapping system Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Commercial Needs Analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 15-minute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage and with the proposed project acreage being included in the supply totals. Table 3.3.1 on the next page shows that calculation. 13 Table 3.3.1 Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per GMD Commercial Inventory & Population 1,051,502 1,251,215 1,455,977 1,704,486 1,984,609 2,299,916 Retail Supply Developed 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 Vacant 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- Total Supply --- 1,426,454 --- 1,426,454 --- 1,426,454 --- 1,426,454 --- 1,426,454 --- 1,426,454 Allocation Ratio 1.36 1.14 0.98 0.84 0.72 0.62 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant Adding the proposed 200.000 square feet of commercial space proposed for the Subject Property is shown in Table 3.3.2 below. Table 3.3.2 Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per GMD Commercial Inventory & Population 997,661 1,131,602 1,261,563 1,424,186 1,604,778 1,805,176 Retail Supply Developed 925,404 925,404 925,404 925,404 925,404 925,404 Vacant 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- 701,050 --- Total Supply --- 1,626,454 --- 1,626,454 --- 1,626,454 --- 1,626,454 --- 1,626,454 --- 1,626,454 Allocation Ratio 1.55 1.30 1.12 0.95 0.82 0.71 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant The future demand generally looks out to the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year, which is currently either 2025 to 2040 depending on the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and growth management plan horizon year requirements. In Collier County's case, the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year is 2025.1-lowever, since the County is fast approaching the year 2020, the horizon year will quickly become 2030 to match the County's 10-year planning horizon. 14 It is at this point of the analysis that has caused an anomaly in determining a true economic supply and demand result. On the supply side, it is relatively easy to determine the amount of existing and approved supply from the property appraiser data. The difficulty lies in the vacant non -approved potential lands. Collier County Staff requires the Applicant to take all of those lands that have a commercial overlay on them and include them as supply by putting a floor area ratio figure to the acreage. The issue becomes apparent when all of the lands that are not in the existing or approved category are included in the particular land use analysis. By putting all of the potential lands in the supply category, the assumption is that all of that land would be developed as that particular land use overlay and nothing else. The flaw in that representation is all of those vacant approved parcels and parcels designated by the FLUM as having the potential to be developed as one use, which could be a non -competing or some other commercial use. The same parcels are also counted as competing supply when a commercial needs analysis is performed for another commercial use. Essentially, they are double counted in both analyses when they will actually be developed as the market demand dictates. A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply for the most part is generated as demand dictates. It is a rare situation where supply generates demand. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Again, basic economic principals have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available commercial choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. 15 The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. The Consultant believes that to ensure proper flexibility in the comprehensive plan of a rapidly growing county like Collier, a commercial allocation ratio in the range of 1.25 to 1.5 is necessary to maintain planning flexibility and to account for the double counting of land uses. History has shown that the former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") (Currently the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity) ("DEO") recommended an allocation ratio of 1.25 in the horizon year of a comprehensive plan yet it had seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for commercial space in the Subject Property's market area from 2020 through 2045. The results show that the addition of the Subject Property to the Collier County commercial inventory will not adversely affect the balance of commercial supply in the 15-minute drive time area. The Allocation Ratio is 1.30 in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 2025 horizon year with the addition of the Subject Property and is just above the recommended 1.25 allocation ratio as suggested by the former Florida DCA now Florida DEO. If the horizon year is extended to 2030 which will happen in two years, the allocation ratio is 1.12, below the State's recommended and accepted 1.25 allocation ratio and also below the constricting 1.15 ratio the County has used as a measuring stick. 16 The future commercial supply could possibly include a portion of the square footage from the proposed Rural Lands West town. That commercial square footage is in flux as to its location and amount so since the commercial location is not determined, the amount of acreage and square footage that would fall within the drive time area could not be calculated and used in this analysis. Another point to consider is that as this area develops, the population will increase significantly as other areas of the County reach full development and therefore the supply will need to be increased to reach the overriding demand from this growth. This area will rapidly trend toward the County -wide per capita square foot demand of 78.22 square feet. If the 78.22 square feet per capita calculation is used in this analysis, then the allocation ratio would be 0.25 in the horizon year of 2025. That is also economically unfeasible. The Consultant believes that the square foot per capita figure will increase in time over the building out of the rural estates and urban estates and come closer to the county wide average rather than remain straight line. Therefore, the allocation ratio will come closer to the County prescribed 1.15 in the horizon year of 2025. Finally, while the total existing and potential commercial supply exceeds the demand, the potential supply makes up just under 50% of the total future supply in the 15-minute drive time area. Markets are efficient and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. However, the future supply will be exhausted as it related to future demand just after 2030 so it is imperative that the future of the commercial supply in this 15-minute drive time market area needs to increase to accommodate the future demand. (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 17 APPENDICES FID 4293 13603 13663 85110 87621 119041 119403 121753 122756 118713 118717 118719 118720 118723 118724 118727 118795 85098 85100 87623 119113 121719 1664 13185 85108 421 85109 4713 85106 218584 220522 142048 14270 Appendix Table A - 15-Minute Drive Time Developed Competing Commercial Parcels ACRES_GIS 1.05 3.56 23.75 1.50 1.89 3.83 2.65 1.33 1.23 2.73 1.64 2.81 2.34 2.34 1.17 1.14 2.81 8.20 14.61 4.86 5.29 2.50 0.46 0.28 1.80 0.82 1.06 1.27 1.16 6.60 1.91 1.65 4.30 114.54 O_NAM E1 CAMERON PARTNERS LLC BLEND -ALL HOTEL DEV INC ET AL WAL-MART STORES EAST LP CITY MATTRESS OF FL INC CVS 75479 FL L L C WALGREEN CO 7-ELEVEN INCS LLC URIKA OIL INC NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES LP LAND 850.034 TRUST LAND TRUST 850.038 850.032 LAND TRUST 850.026 LAND TRUST 850.031 LAND TRUST 850.027 LAND TRUST LAND TRUST 850.045 850.33 LAND TRUST BRENTWOOD LAND PARTNERS LLC TARGET CORPORATION T-2063 CAMERON PARTNERS LLC CARLISLE WILSON PLAZA LLC PAC OF COLLIER INC TEJERINA, GABRIEL A=& BETTY GRACE-KELLY LLC CH NFL LLC GCD MISSION HILLS LLC BRENTWOOD LAND PARTNERS LLC BARNETT BANK N A AMSOUTH BANK PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC 7 ELEVEN INC CYPRESS CYCLE SERVICES INC JONJAMES LLC LUSEDOR_D Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Store (One Story) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) Community Shopping Center Community Shopping Center Community Shopping Center Community Shopping Center Community Shopping Center One Story Office Restaurant Restaurant Drive Thru Restaurant Drive Thru Restaurant Financial Institution Financial Institution Vacant Commercial Store (One Story) Auto Sales/Service Florist, Greenhouse BLDG SOFT 6,215 14,308 204,181 11,465 13,157 14,232 7,793 3,448 3,620 1,450 1,454 1,248 1,290 1,581 1,363 1,167 2,678 84,344 175,337 31,382 35,856 20,356 3,460 1,168 6,225 2,171 2,810 3,840 3,069 50700 3111 2,400 8,525 725,404 Average Building Sq. Ft. Per Acre: 6,333 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS 19 Appendix Table B - 15-Minute Drive Time Undeveloped Competing Parcels FID ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 LUSEDOR_D 484 1.59 VANDERBILT COMMONS I TRUST Vacant Commercial 1695 1.00 PIEDMONT/METROLINA FUND#12 LLC Vacant Commercial 6602 4.11 ROBERT E WILLIAMS TRUST Vacant Commercial 13878 16.17 VOILA II LLC Vacant Commercial 13887 8.92 VOILA II LLC Vacant Commercial 87622 1.01 FIFTH THIRD BANK Vacant Commercial 118716 1.17 850.025 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118718 2.34 850.023 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118721 1.64 850.035 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118725 2.81 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W TRUST Vacant Commercial 118726 2.34 850.024 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118729 2.73 850.028 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118796 5.15 850.018 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118797 5.47 850.018 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 119039 2.58 CORDER, MICHAEL A=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119040 2.58 CORDER, MICHAEL A=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119044 2.34 CORDER, MICHAEL=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119112 2.08 CENTRAL FL REAL EST OWNED LLC Vacant Commercial 136373 4.05 TRKR FAMILY TRUST Vacant Commercial 136418 5.46 TAYLOR, NORMAN L=& JOANNE Vacant Commercial 142105 2.58 SOUTHBROOKE MEDICAL OFFICE LLC Vacant Commercial 142149 2.56 SOUTHBROOKE MEDICAL OFFICE LLC Vacant Commercial 161614 5.32 PULTE HOME CORP Vacant Commercial 165698 1.42 CAMERON PARTNERS II LLC Vacant Commercial 165699 1.35 CAMERON PARTNERS II LLC Vacant Commercial 165701 1.74 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC Vacant Commercial 165704 1.01 PIEDMONT/METROLINA FUND#12 LLC Vacant Commercial 218582 1.28 CYPRESS COMMERCIAL DEV LLC Vacant Commercial 218583 2.09 CVS 75462 FL LLC Vacant Commercial 220531 12.22 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO Vacant Residential 165706 1.00 CAMERON PARTNERS II LLC Vacant Commercial 165707 0.95 V&T LAND LLC Vacant Commercial 165841 1.64 PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE Vacant Commercial 110.69 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS 20 Appendix Table C - 15-Minute Drive Time Non -Competing Developed Commercial Eliminated Developed Non -Competitive Uses FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 14208 82016 86253 86260 96886 98020 98024 98325 102724 16SS23 165633 165842 166187 166562 166563 166570 168512 169188 169191 4776 11975 12524 12525 12658 14324 14522 101874 102568 161519 165200 165203 166571 14314 74915 22632 13321 142046 6169 14269 2.39 0.64 1.13 0.33 0.14 2.67 3.30 1.28 1.43 0.37 13.74 0.62 0.82 0.43 0.97 0.58 1.52 1.96 1.68 20.81 100.06 75.09 38.70 11.51 1009.50 246.69 109.26 5.44 86.82 2.56 10.82 140.39 27.96 20.89 390.57 20.27 5.17 14.22 50.51 CLEARY HOLDINGS LLC ASSOCIA @ GULF COAST, AAMC BRISTOL PINES COMMUNITY BRISTOL PINES COMMUNITY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS CRYSTAL LAKE JOINT VENTURE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY CLUBHOMES AT HERITAGE GREENS HERITAGE GREENS COMMUNITY CRESTVIEW VILLAS AT HERITAGE HUNTINGTON LAKES ONE HUNGTON LAKES FOUR IBIS COVE MASTER PROPERTY TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE CYPRESS WOODS GOLF & COUNTRY CYPRESS WOODS GOLF & COUNTRY QUAIL CREEK VILLAGE FOUND INC QUAIL CREEK VLG FOUNDATION INC BONITA BAY CLUB INC OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB INC TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE GREENS GOLF COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY RES COLLIER HOLDINGS LLC APAC-GEORGIA INC CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS JOHN H WINKLER TR FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION DEWANE, BISHOP FRANK J LUSEDOR D Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Mineral Processing Open storage, building supplies, junk yd Open storage, building supplies, junk yd Churches Churches BLDG SQFT 21 16,000 2,471 4,079 334 648 3,440 9,292 1,590 234 255 256 177 307 162 2,358 269 9,366 288 4,882 126 18,977 7,000 9,425 6,250 29,835 33,130 126 8,540 25,874 12,450 23,982 16,183 1,670 299,340 11,140 71,120 4,704 3,600 54,074 14419 8.80 ST PAUL ANTIOCH IAN Churches 5,866 14429 36.36 LIVING WORD FAMILY CHURCH INC Churches 50,226 14492 4.37 SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOC Churches 3,433 116150 4.74 IGLESIA CRISTIANA LA ROCA INC Churches 10,759 116154 2.58 HAITIAN BETHESDA BAPTIST Churches 3,080 116934 4.77 GOLDEN GATE CONGREGATION OF Churches 8,496 116963 4.55 CYPRESS WOOD PRSBY CHURCH INC Churches 6,360 128775 1.93 CORKSCREW BAPTIST CHURCH INC Churches 3,536 142024 5.49 NORTH NAPLES BAPTIST CH INC Churches 22,416 142037 5.37 DESTINY CHURCH NAPLES INC Churches 8,355 142190 4.95 EAGLE'S NEST WORSHIP CENTER Churches 20,054 142229 2.26 NAPLES BAPTIST TEMPLE INC Churches 4,062 142272 6.02 ST MONICA'S EPISCOPAL Churches 15,252 169192 8.98 CORNERSTONE UNITED METHODIST Churches 16,000 13879 9.68 HERNANDEZ FAMILY LLC Private schools and colleges 7,216 87620 3.36 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC Private Hospitals 41,465 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 22 Appendix Table D - 15-Minute Drive Time Non -Competing Undeveloped Commercial Parcels Eliminated Vacant Non -Competitive Uses FID ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 LUSEDOR_D 86408 165162 1509 2006 2208 4035 4883 11778 11779 11783 11974 12527 12854 13213 14325 101815 101880 101882 102002 102704 102913 102977 102978 102979 102982 102985 102989 102990 161430 161431 161432 161433 161436 161438 161443 161522 161528 161532 161537 1.08 WATERWAYS JV HOLDINGS LP 0.46 51.52 1.82 13.41 6.97 83.78 56.18 6.89 3.10 7.80 15.67 9.45 7.48 7.09 0.26 1.66 0.10 2.17 0.53 13.98 0.17 0.06 0.07 2.83 9.50 7.99 29.38 8.94 0.76 1.76 9.72 3.66 2.68 20.97 62.96 0.40 11.03 5.36 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY STRAND AT NAPLES LLC TWINEAGLES CLUB LLC, THE QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC PULTE HOME CORP VANDERBILT CMMTY ASSOC INC QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC GRAND CYPRESS REC ASSOC INC CYPRESS TRACE RECREATION REFERENCE ONLY OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT LTD QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC RESOURCE CONSERVATION SYS LLC TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC PULTE HOME CORP Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges 23 161539 161541 161542 161544 161545 161546 161548 161549 161551 161554 161555 161556 161557 161559 161560 165273 165275 165276 165277 165278 165279 165281 165283 165284 166499 121752 20465 120349 121182 121183 121185 126263 127061 127384 128214 128645 130771 130772 130774 131881 132576 132614 132615 8.15 3.13 0.44 6.21 2.48 1.71 3.61 0.35 6.27 9.39 7.22 0.85 1.18 5.58 6.05 32.91 9.55 20.73 28.55 2.18 11.80 28.28 11.69 0.29 0.35 3.83 1.28 3.41 7.20 6.09 2.96 1.14 1.59 2.73 1.17 3.41 2.95 2.46 2.46 1.14 1.64 2.50 2.50 PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP PULTE HOME CORP HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY URIKA OIL INC KEMPTON TR, GEORGE R CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC CORKSCREW BAPTIST CHURCH INC COLLINS, CARY B=& JOYCE A COLLINS, CARY B=& JOYCE A SILVA, LEICY CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Open storage, building supplies, junk yd Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional Vacant Institutional 24 132616 1.61 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132618 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132619 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132620 1.68 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132657 5.00 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132658 1.67 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 133522 3.01 MYJESUS MERCY MINISTRIES INC Vacant Institutional 133523 3.61 MYJESUS MERCY MINISTRIES INC Vacant Institutional 137902 1.59 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 142042 2.73 FAITH BIBLE CHURCH/NAPLES INC Vacant Institutional Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 25 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL2O16OOOO221) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The proposed Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict is an undeveloped 20± acre parcel. The Subdistrict proposes up to 200,000 square feet of general retail, office and institutional space on approximately 20± acres. The property is zoned Estates and currently permits single-family homes at 1 du/2.25 acres. The property would support up to 7 single family homes under the current plan designation. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on potable Water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS, and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the 2017 AUIR. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County potable water service area. The County has existing plant capacity of 52.75 MGD (FY 2018) and a planned plant capacity of 56.75 MGD (FY 2023). The proposed addition of 200,000 square feet of general commercial uses will not create any LOS issues in the 5-year planning horizon. This Project will have no significant impact on the potable water system and capacity is available in Collier County. Collier County LOS: Permitted Capacity: Required Plant Capacity FY27: *Based on EP Estimates Data Source: Collier County 2017 AUIR 150 gpcd/(0.15) gpd/sf* 52.75 mgd 48.25 mgd Non-residential development does not facilitate population growth. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is located within the service boundary of Collier County utilities with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subdistrict is located in the north sewer service area of the Collier County Water/Sewer District. This Project will have no significant impact on the Collier County Regional Sewer System. Collier County LOS: Permitted Capacity: Required Plant Capacity FY27: 100 gpcd/(0.15) gpd/sf* 24.85 mgd 23.75 mgd August 29, 2019 Page 1 of 3 IR15PUD Exhibit VE-rev2.docx ® GradyA9inor ii nnginccrs • Land Survcyors • Manus • Iandscapc Archttccts Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL2O16OOOO221) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis *Based on EP Estimates Data Source: Collier County 2016 AUIR Non-residential development does not facilitate population growth. Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. An environmental Resource Permit (ERP) issued by the South Florida Water Management District which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict will be consistent with the County LOS standards. Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues and none are anticipated through the year 2067. Existing: .55/pp disposal rate 2.4 pp/household 9 single family residences permitted 9 x 2.4 pp/household x .55 pp = 11.88 tons solid waste/year Proposed: Retail/office 200,000 x 5 Ibs/1,000 sq ft = 1,000 Ibs/day x 365 = 365,000 Ibs/year or 365 tons/year Current landfill capacity in 2018 is anticipated to be 17,001,964 tons. Total Permitted Landfill Capacity Remaining, 2017 17,244,316 Tons Required Permitted Landfill Capacity, 2017 2,625,495 Tons Total Lined Cell Capacity Remaining, 2017 2,372,915 Tons August 29, 2019 Page 2 of 3 IR15PUD Exhibit VE-rev2.docx ® Gradyh4inor ii nnginccrs • Land Survcyors • Manus • Iandscapc ArchUcts Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL2O16OOOO221) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Required Lined Cell Capacity, 2017 490,736 Tons Source: Collier County 2017 AUIR Cal Recycle Parks: Community and Regional Parks impact fees are not assessed for commercial development. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the amendment of the subdistrict. Crhnnic School impact fees are not assessed for commercial development. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #10 is located at 13240 Immokalee Rd, which is approximately one half mile from the southern property boundary. Emergency Medical Service - Station #10 is located at 17596 Immokalee Road, which is approximately one half mile from the northern property boundary. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on each unit. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire and Rescue District - Station #10 13240 Immokalee Rd Emergency Medical Service - Station #10 17596 Immokalee Rd Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 4 (Estates Substation) 14750 Immokalee Rd August 29, 2019 Page 3 of 3 IR15PUD Exhibit VE-rev2.docx ® Gradyhlinor Chit xngfnurs • band Survcyors • Ylanncrs • Landscapc Axhttccts 21Jtl—Sl Utl U21 �� IVNUINNI — UIIGS ItlI JNIN-Ido — I'VtlO O 0 7 0 O C N , w J ILS H (-) cc LU W a -I o --- — a - mj ---i---� c� C7 is R _ 1 LOGAW TPODIICOCR planning engineering Traffic Impact Statement Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Prepared for: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, PA 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone: 239-947-0375 Collier County, Florida 09/06/2019 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Malor Study — $1,500.00 Fee Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. J �iTR����',, �•`p�P�'\ G•E N SF �CO� No 47116 o STATE OFAl Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., 47116 State of Florida Digitally signed by Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., 47116 State of Florida DN: cn=Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., 47116 State of Florida, o=This item has been electronically signed and sealed using a SHA-1 authentication code., ou=Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies., email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz, c=US Date: 2019.09.11 12:09:28-04'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 2 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Table of Contents ProjectDescription......................................................................................................................... 4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................... 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................... 8 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................ 10 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................... 11 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis............................................................ 12 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis...................................................................................................... 13 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 14 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 15 Appendices Appendix A: Project Parcel Aerial.............................................................................................. 16 Appendix B: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition....................................................... 18 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 3 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Project Description The subject project is a proposed commercial/retail development located on the west side of Immokalee Road (CR 846), north of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard, within Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Parcel Aerial. Figure 1— Project Location Map N apleN aple SST 'h m o 11 niam. rE Corkscrew Miocl[e School© 7-EW... s Project µ F� 0 PAW Super Market Mobil at Neighborhood.. °ose.c..e r,ai fin. doll Blrtl Flu —Blvd FaMeII01rtl CdWr Mobil' Aut. Repal Googie Palmeno Ridge Q High School fon well ad - val"oe Golf e' &Country Club P —A Bantlafl Blvd The property is currently vacant land. The subject site is approximately 20 acres in size and is currently zoned as Estates Zoning District ("E") as illustrated in the adopted Collier County 2012-2025 Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impact analysis for the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment of the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict from Estates zoning District to Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. The proposed change would allow for two development scenarios as follow: Scenario 1 — 200,000 square feet (sf) retail building; or, Scenario 2 — 150,000 square feet (sf) retail building and 50,000 sf of medical office. Conservatively, this analysis classifies the proposed retail building as shopping center for traffic generation purposes. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 For the purposes of this evaluation, the project build -out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2024 planning horizon. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The development program is illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Development Program at Buildout Conditions Development ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Scenario 1 Retail Shopping Center 820 200,000 sf Scenario 2 Retail Shopping Center 820 150,000 sf Medical Office Medical - Dental Office Building 720 50,000 sf Based on the project location relative to Immokalee Road (refer to Appendix A), connection to subject project is expected to consist of a full movement access drive onto Immokalee Road (CR 846) at its intersection with Orange Tree Boulevard, which is currently a signalized intersection. Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) T Generation Manual, 101" Edition. The software program OTISS — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (most current version) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE equations are used for the trip generation calculations. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix B: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10' Edition. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. The ITE guidelines provide internal capture provisions for retail and office uses interactions. Per Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. Projected internal capture traffic reduction for the Scenario 2 development is calculated as 7.3% of the unadjusted PM peak hour traffic. Consistent with ITE guidelines and Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips are not considered for Scenario 1 development. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 5 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational - access analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Per ITE User's Guide and Handbook recommendations, PM peak period average pass -by trip percentage is 34% for the Shopping Center land use (ITE LUC 820). Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass -by capture for shopping centers should not exceed 25% for the peak hour. Therefore, based on a conservative approach, this analysis calculates pass -by reduction for shopping center as 25% for AM and PM peak hours, and 15% for daily two-way traffic. The projected trip generation scenarios for the proposed development at build out conditions are illustrated in Table 2A and Table 2B. Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed Development — Scenario 1) - Average Weekday Development 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume ITE Land Use Shopping Center Unadjusted Traffic Internal Capture External Traffic Pass -by Net External Traffic Size I I Enter I Exit I Total I Enter I Exit I Total 200,000 sf 9,632 N/A 9,632 156 96 252 436 N/A 436 109 327 472 N/A 908 N/A 908 227 681 N/A N/A N/A 156 96 252 472 118 1,445 8,187 39 24 63 117 72 189 354 Table 213 Trip Generation (Proposed Development — Scenario 2) - Average Weekday Development ITE Land Use Size Shopping Center 150,000 sf 24 Hour Two- Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 141 86 227 352 382 734 7,921 Medical -Dental Office Building 50,000 sf 1,833 94 27 121 48 124 172 Unadjusted Traffic 9,754 235 113 348 400 506 906 Internal Capture 586 12 12 24 33 33 66 External Traffic 9,168 223 101 324 367 473 840 Pass -by 1,144 33 21 54 82 93 175 Net External Traffic 8,024 190 80 270 285 380 665 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2018 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Based on the trip generation results, from a traffic standpoint, the proposed Scenario 1 development is more intense when compared against Scenario 2 option. In addition, as illustrated in Table 2A, the PM peak hour yields a higher trip generation rate when compared to the AM peak hour. For the purpose of this report, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour of net external traffic (pass - by traffic is considered) generated by the proposed Scenario 1 development at buildout conditions. The estimated net new increase in external trips by the proposed amendment at build out is 681 PM peak hour two-way trip ends. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Trip Distribution and Assignment The net external traffic generated by the proposed project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and engineering judgement. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3 and it is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Proposed Development —Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Roadway Link Collier County Link No. Roadway Link Location Distribution of Project Traffic PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* Enter EB — 49 Exit WB — 53 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 44.0 Collier Blvd. to Wilson Blvd. 15% Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Wilson Blvd. to Randall Blvd. 30% 50% EB — 98 EB —164 WB — 106 WB — 177 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Randall Blvd. to Project Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Project to Oil Well Rd. 40% WB —131 EB —141 Immokalee Rd (CR 846) Wilson Blvd. 46.0 North of Oil Well Rd. 15% WB — 49 NB — 49 EB — 53 118.0 South of Immokalee Rd. 15% SB — 53 Randall Blvd. 132.0 Immokalee Rd. to 8th St NE 15% WB — 49 EB — 53 Randall Blvd. 132.0 8th St NE to Everglades Blvd. 10% WB — 33 EB — 35 Oil Well Rd. 119.0 41h Street NE** N/A East of Immokalee Rd. 25% WB — 82 SB — 16 EB — 89 NB — 18 North of Immokalee Rd. 5% Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 18 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour Project Trip Waterways of Naples G—d House - ... ° Distribution Map by o 1 GJ% Palmett° Ritlge Q "'g" 5t"°°' Percentage - - �u.,•vv.. _. . rx.a,-ue .�m,�...Cure ,Ud.lke,cho,ll9 v c\aYOil well Rd 7-Ele., �� ® 25% N 4o°i° 9 z' �••• JAbsorption £ 10% - Valencia Golf R r—try Club a I'0111151and _ n 50% o 1a »xry ° nw rvw 15 /0 ¢ 9P'oli 5.Per Market eac ow nN o'°my R<e oighbo oad el e 1l�evll 6Wd Ra�a� e ® z Y Ra�dau iJ.--Rmrtl)F II Pa�d�ii ¢w<I�� mokaleeR 1 0% vnmakalee Rtl z Collli,Mobil A 1111,lrg . 15% Absorption Google r erwaye ° 0 Naples Guartl House i..n.a Project Trip w�.. Distribution Map by ""' WB 491 Ridg. 1p n Pal High Schaal PM Peak Hour IEB 53 M WB 82 wIod�. Rw �.eAwa,: „e«ar ��,aA,.. k" EB 89 7-Eleven V �� ® a Wall P<i N WB 131 3 g EB 141 Note: For consistency, Immokalee ...; JAbsorption Rd. directions of travel are assumed :..r Enter 26, Exit 29 westbound (WB) and eastbound (EB) �dte,�a Galt, ;•i R Cou-riry Club °rt,lsla�d NB 18 �� WB 177 _- SB 16 _eF EB 164 = WB 53 Pub bl Super V.,ket EB 49 0 tghhorh-d .o.. II..1,e� Q Rantlalglvtl RaMa �a lmmakalee r+d WB 106 WB 49 _ WB 33 R awaw = EB 98°Mier EB 53 IEB 35 Auto Repair FT 49 »rvw SB 53 roM Absorption Enter 16; Exit 18 Go g! Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates are estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from peak hour peak direction volume (estimated from 2008 through 2018), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2018 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two determinations is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2024. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2018 - 2024) 2024 Projected 2024 Projected 2018 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Peak Dir CC Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Background AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Trip Roadway Link Traffic Volume Traffic Volume Link Location Traffic Growth Factor Bank w/out Project w/out Project ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth Factor** Bank*** m Imokalee lm no Collier Blvd. to t27.37ot1.1509 44.0 1,770 2,038 849 2,619 846) Wilson Blvd. Immokalee Wilson Blvd. to Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Randall Blvd. 2,020 2.38% 1.1516 2,327 389 2,409 Immokalee Randall Blvd. to Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Project 2,020 2.38% 1.1262 2,327 389 2,409 Immokalee Project to Oil 45.0 2,020 2.38% 1.1262 2,327 389 2,409 Rd (CR 846) Well Rd. Immokalee North of Oil Well 46.0 410 4.0% 1.2653 519 168 578 Rd (CR 846) Rd. South of Wilson Blvd. 118.0 340 2.0% 1.1262 383 0 340 Immokalee Rd. Randall Immokalee Rd. Blvd. 132.0 to 8th St NE 820 2.0% 1.1262 924 40 860 Randall 8th St NE to 132.0 820 2.0% 1.1262 924 40 860 Blvd. Everglades Blvd. East of Oil Well Rd. 119.0 850 4.9451. 1.3355 1,136 287 1,137 Immokalee Rd. Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2018 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate )6. 2024 Projected Volume = 2018 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2024 Projected Volume = 2018 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2024 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the Collier County 2018 AUIR and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. The Randall Boulevard segment from Immokalee Road to 8th Street NE has intersection improvements planned which will include 4-laning Randall Boulevard to 8th Street NE. As such, this Randall Boulevard segment is expected to have a 2024 peak direction, peak hour capacity volume of 2,000 vph. As no other improvements were identified in the Collier County 2018 AUIR, the other evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build - out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC 2018 Peak 2024 Peak AUIR 2018 Roadway Link Min. 2024 Dir, Peak Hr Dir, Peak Hr Roadway Link Roadway Standard Roadway Link Location Capacity Capacity Condition LOS Condition ID # Volume Volume Immokalee Rd 44.0 Collier Blvd. to 6D 3,300 (EB) 6D E 3,300 (EB) (CR 846) Wilson Blvd. Immokalee Rd 45.0 Wilson Blvd. to 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D 3,300 (EB) (CR 846) Randall Blvd. Immokalee Rd 45.0 Randall Blvd. to 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D 3,300 (EB) (CR 846) Project Immokalee Rd 45.0 Project ttodOil Well 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D 3,300 (EB) (CR 846) Immokalee Rd 46.0 North of Oil Well 2U D 900 (EB) 2U 900 (EB) (CR 846) Rd. Wilson Blvd. 118.0 South of 2U D 900 (SB) 2U 900 (SB) Immokalee Rd. Randall Blvd. 132.0 Immokalee Rd. to 8th St NE 2U D 900 (EB) 4D 2,000 (EB) gth St NE to Randall Blvd. 132.0 2U D 900 (EB) 2U 900 (EB) Oil Well Rd 119.0 Everglades Blvd. 4D 2,000 (EB) East of IRmdmokalee 4D D 2,000 (EB) Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which are evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2024). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Table 6 illustrates the LOS traffic impacts of the project to the area roadway network. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2024 2024 Peak Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC Dir, Peak Link Peak 2024 Peak /o Vol exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Hr Dir, Peak Hr without with Link Link ID Location Capacity (Project Vol Volume Impact by project? Project? # Volume Added)* w/project** Project Yes/No Yes/No Immokalee Collier Blvd. to 3,300 Rd (CR 846) 44.0 Wilson Blvd. (EB) EB-49 2,668 1.5% No No Immokalee Wilson Blvd. to 3,300 Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Randall Blvd. (EB) EB-98 2,507 3.0% No No Immokalee Randall Blvd. to 3,300 Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Project (EB) EB —164 2,573 5.0% No No Immokalee Project to Oil 3,300 Rd (CR 846) 45.0 Well Rd. (EB) EB —141 2,550 ° 4.3/° No No Immokalee 46.0 North of Oil Well (EB) EB — 53 631 5.9% No No Rd (CR 846) Rd.900 Wilson 118.0 South of 900 (SB) EB — 53 436 5.9% No No Blvd. Immokalee Rd. Randall Immokalee Rd. 2,000 Blvd. 132.0 to 8th St NE (EB) EB — 53 977 2.7% No No Randall 8th St NE to 132.0 900 (EB) EB-35 959 3.9% Yes Yes Blvd. Everglades Blvd. East of 2,000 Oil Well Rd. 119.0 EB — 89 1,226 4.5% No No Immokalee Rd. (EB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2024 Projected Volume = 2024 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Based on the information illustrated in Table 6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted from a traffic perspective: Immokalee Road from Wilson Boulevard to Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 east of Oil Well Road (Collier County Link ID #45.0 and ID #46.0), Wilson Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard (Link ID #118.0), Randall Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard (Link ID #132.0) and Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard (Link ID #119.0). Based on the data contained within the 2018 AUIR, the Randall Boulevard segment from 8tn Street NE to Everglades Boulevard (Link ID #132.0) is shown to operate with a LOS deficiency under 2024 under background conditions. The Randall Boulevard segment is being evaluated through the Randall Boulevard Corridor Study (underway) and Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard intersection improvement PD&E (underway). As illustrated in Table 6, all other analyzed roadway links are projected to operate within Collier County's adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2024 future build -out conditions. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states that "the County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved." The Developer proposes to provide a transportation mitigation plan in order to stay consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Collier County's GMP. The Developer may be required to assist the County with potential capacity/operational improvements that would provide sufficient capacity on the Randall Boulevard analyzed segment. It is noted that the Immokalee Road analyzed segments are Collier County designated hurricane evacuation routes as depicted in Collier County Transportation Element — Map TR - 7. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is expected to consist of a full movement access drive onto Immokalee Road (CR 846) at its intersection with Orange Tree Boulevard, which is currently a signalized intersection. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Immokalee Road (CR 846) is a 6-lane urban divided arterial under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. This is currently a curb and gutter facility. As depicted in the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards ("MUMS") for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (commonly known as the "Florida Greenbook"), Table 3-15, curb and gutter is not to be used on facilities with design speed greater than 45 mph. As such, a design speed of 45 mph is considered for the purposes of this report. Based on FDOT Standard Plans Index 711-001 (sheet 11 of 13), for a design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Project access is evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-of-way Manual: (a) two-lane roadways — 40 vph for right -turn lane/20 vph for left -turn lane; and (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left turn lanes. A dedicated westbound right -turn lane and a dedicated eastbound left -turn lane are warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criterion. Currently, there is an existing +/-340 foot eastbound left -turn lane servicing this intersection. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of zoning application or site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters become available. Improvement Analysis Based on the data contained within the 2018 AUIR, the Randall Boulevard segment from 8ti, Street NE to Everglades Boulevard (Link ID #132.0) is shown to operate with a capacity and LOS deficiency under 2024 background conditions. All other roadway network facilities have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips for the amended project within the 5-year planning period. Based on the traffic impact analysis results, the proposed project is a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. The significance criterion is not met for Immokalee Road segment located west of Wilson Boulevard. The Developer proposes to provide a transportation mitigation plan in order to stay consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Collier County's GMP. The Developer may be required to assist the County with potential capacity/operational improvements that would provide sufficient capacity on Randall Boulevard analyzed segment. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Consistent with the site access turn lane analysis results, site related turn lane improvements are warranted to accommodate traffic at build -out conditions. Per Collier County Right-of-way (ROW) Handbook Guidelines, if existing ROW is utilized for site related turn lane improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of zoning application or site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters will be made available. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 908 two-way unadjusted PM peak hour trips at project buildout conditions. The estimated net new increase in external trips by the proposed amendment at build out conditions is 681 PM peak hour two-way trip ends. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 115 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Appendix A: Project Parcel Aerial Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 16 r � y A. - L _ i r1. se d� y L _ n � IW. 1 e 5tr' 4. i P J Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Appendix B: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 18 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Project Information Immokalee Rd - Estates Commercial - Retail - Project Name: ITE 10th No: Date: 09/04/2019 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 820 - Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) 200 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 4816 4816 156 96 436 472 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 722 723 39 24 109 118 Non -pass -by 4094 4093 117 72 327 354 Total 4816 4816 156 96 436 472 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 722 723 39 24 109 118 Total Non -pass -by 4094 4093 117 72 327 354 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name : Immokalee Rd - Estates No: Commercial - Retail - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 200 Weekday Best Fit (LOG) 4816 4816 9632 (General Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) +5.57 Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Land Use 820 - Shopping Center TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 0 % 4816 0 % 4816 EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 9632 15 1445 8187 I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 20 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Immokalee Rd - Estates No: Commercial - Retail - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 200 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 156 96 252 (General Hour of Adjacent T = 0.5 (X)+151.78 62% 38% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Land Use 820 - Shopping Center TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0% 156 0% 96 EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 252 25 63 189 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Immokalee Rd - Estates Commercial - Retail - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 StatelProvince: Country: Analyst's Name: No: City: ZiplPostal Code: Client Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 200 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 436 472 908 (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) 48% 52% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +2.89 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Land Use 820 - Shopping Center Land Use 820 - Shopping Center TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Entry Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Reduction 0 % 436 0 % 472 EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 908 U 25 227 681 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 22 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 23 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name : Immokalee Rd - Estates No: Commercial - Retail -Medical - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 City: State/Province: ZipfPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Variable Method Entry Exit Total 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 150 Weekday Best Fit (LOG) 3961 3960 7921 (General Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) +5.57 720 - Medical -Dental 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 50 Weekday Best Fit (LI N) 917 916 1833 Office Building T = 38.42 (X)+-87.62 50% 50% (General Urban/Suburban) TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 3961 0 % 3960 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building 0 % 917 0 % 916 INTERNAL TRIPS 820 - Shopping Center 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Exit 3960 Demand Exit: 29 % (1148) Balanced: Demand Entry: 4 % (37) Entry 917 Entry 3961 Demand Entry: 32% (1268) Balanced: Demand Exit: 28% (256) Exit 916 256 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 24 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 820 - Sh000ina Center Internal Trips Total Trips 720 - Medical -Dental Total External Trips Office Building Entry 3961 (100%) 256 (6%) 256 (6%) 3705 (94%) Exit 3960 (100%) 37 (1%) 37 (1%) 3923 (99%) Total 7921 (100%) 293 (4%) 293 (4%) 7628 (96%) 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Internal Trips Total Trips 820 - Shopping Total External Trips Center Entry 917 (100%) 37 (4%) 37 (4%) 880 (96%) 1660(72%) Exit 916 (100%) 256 (28%) 256 (28%) Total 1833 (100%) 293 (16%) 293 (16%) 11540 (84%) Land Use 820 - Shopping Center 720- Medical -Dental Office Building EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% 7628 15 1540 0 Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 1144 6484 0 1540 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 25 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name : Immokalee Rd - Estates No: Commercial - Retail -Medical - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 150 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) (General Hour of Adjacent T = 0.5 (X)+151.78 Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 720 - Medical -Dental 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 50 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) Office Building Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.89Ln,(X) (General Street Traffic, +1.31 Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Entry Exit Total 141 86 227 62% 38% 94 27 121 78% 22% Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 141 0 % 86 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building 0 % 94 0 % 27 INTERNAL TRIPS I 820 - Shopping Center 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Exit 86 Demand Exit: 29 % (25) Balan4ced: Demand Entry: 4 % (4) Entry 94 Entry 141 Demand Entry: 32 % (45) BalanBced: Demand Exit: 28 % (8) Exit 27 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 26 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 820 - Shopping Center Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Total Entry Exit 141 (100%) 86 (100%) 8 (6%) 4 (5%) 8 (6%) 4 (5%) 133 (94%) 82 (95%) Total 227 (100%) 12 (5%) 12 (5%) 215 (95°%) 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips 820 - Shopping Center I Total Entry Exit 94 (100°%) 27 (100°%) 4 (4%) 8 (30°%) 4 (4°%) 8 (30%) 90 (96°%) 19 (70°%) Total 121 (100%) 12 (10%) 12 (10%) 109 (90%) Land Use 820 - Shopping Center 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 215 25 54 161 109 n 0 109 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 IPERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Immokalee Rd - Estates No: Commercial - Retail -Medical - ITE 10th Date: 9/4/2019 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Variable Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 820 - Shopping Center 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 150 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 352 382 734 (General Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) 48% 52% Urban/Suburban) Street Traffic, +2.89 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 720 - Medical -Dental 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 50 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LIN) 48 124 172 Office Building Hour of Adjacent T = 3.39 (X)+2.02 28% 72% (General Street Traffic, Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land UseEntry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 820 - Shopping Center 0 % 352 0 % 382 720- Medical -Dental Office Building 0 % 48 0 % 124 I_ INTERNAL TRIPS 820 - Shopping Center Exit 382 Demand Exit: 2 % (8) Entry 352 Demand Entry: 8 % (28) 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building Balanced: Demand Entry: 31 % (15) Entry 48 8 Balanced: Demand Exit: 20 % (25) Exit 124 25 it Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 28 Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict — GMPA — TIS — September 2019 820 - Shopping Center 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 820 - Shopping Center 701 0 25 175 526 720 - Medical -Dental Office Building 139 0 0 139 Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips 720-Medical-Dental Office Building Total Entry Exit 352 (100%) 382 (100%) 25 (7%) 8 (2%) 25 (7%) 8 (2%) 327 (93%) 374 (98%) Total 734 (100%) 33 (4%) 33 (4%) 701 (96%) Total Trips Internal Trips External Trips 820-Shopping Center Total Entry Exit 48 (100%) 124 (100%) 8 (17%) 25 (20%) 8 (17%) 25 (20%) 40 (83%) 99 (80%) Total 172 (100%) 33 (19%) 33 (19%) 139 (81%) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 29 Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict (PL20160000221) Exhibit V.F1 Flood Zone 2 BFE Contour Line Ferns Flood Zones FEMA 2011 A AE AH . VE X . X500 May 13, 2019 Page 1 of 1 IR15PUD Exhibit VF1-rev2.docx ® GradyNnor G i � i I EAgfneers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects k $ LU vc)# 0 ULU { Q U W CV w LU w z zM z w 9NISHit w w w z z w _ W w M -aN 19 ❑NZ� d � 11 Sr Y H H {Z� i N ( IS NOS-11AA z ' JU4N 1S ❑ NZ � z W z z d LO W v w > JINN 15 H 1� Iwi H H r� r7 m MN IS H 19 U) z � o , a W � V Z } U � w w ` mO cn a- w 0 0 C 0 C 0 C C O p E O E_ O E 0 YI d O F m ~ m H m � } } N LO w 1 N � n. m II y N II v N II d N II m N LL N M 7 Q _ z o. w w 00 No a N o II f z� o, o- w J Q O U cn INSTR 5230469 OR 5243 PG 2746 RECORDED 2/19/2016 4:20 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $11,613.00 REC $27.00 CONS $1,658,941.76 Prepared by: Matthew L. Grabinski, Esq. COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite #300 Naples, Florida 34 t03 239-435-3535 After Recording Return To: Brad Stockham Collier Insurance Agency, LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34105 239-262-2600 Consideration: $1,658,941.76 Above This Line For Recording FORM - SECTION This Indenture made this 1017" day of,F ruary,° f6�k_.q een Crown, Management Services L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability comlany whose pest cffce addxess is07'Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, of the Township of Collier, County of Ile cqy-,,, ommo w { tee °n iva is 15142, grantor*, and BCHD Partners I, LLC, a Florida limited liailiy camaryvio po;ce address is Barron Collier Companies, Attn: David Genson, 2600 Golden Paf3k a Nall 'F(` ida 34 10, i0aniee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for andl*, c (isideration of the su f 7 EN= 15 NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations, Waid grantor in hand p I l y grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, d,sO'K to the said grantee, d grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying anda, to -wit: See attached Exhibit "A" .. Subject to: (a) ad valorem real property taxes for the year 2016 and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and (d) restrictions, reservations, and easements common to the subdivision, if any. Tax ID Numbers: 37698360002, 37698440003 and 37698480005 and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. {Signature Block on Following Page} OR 5243 PG 2747 In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Name: _)7a/L ► a& Witness Name: �'Y�c.,;Q t S,c.l,i,t vc�- ri Stateof County of C o t 1 i e— The foregoing instrument was Vice President of Crown Ma [Notary Seal] as MATTHEW ARAMNW "MV purge - $tee of F104 Coma"sim ♦ FF 921Va my Comm. EXOM J" 20,2( Crown Management Services L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company By: o ert A rown, Vice President f February, 2016 by Robert A. Crown, [lly ;known to me or [__] has produced Matthew L Grabinski Commission Expires: *** OR 5243 PG 2748 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: The North 180 feet of Tract No. 116, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 2: Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS that portion taken for road right of way pursuant to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3111, Page 500, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: A Portion of Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence South 01'30' 15" East, for a distance of 172.46 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears South 88°32'50" West, a distance of 2,814.93 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,814.93 feet, through a central angle of 03'12'32", subtended by a chord of 157.83 feet at a bearing of South 00°09'06" West, for an arc length of 157.65 feet to the end of said curve, and the Southeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence North 89°40'50" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 118, for a distance of 50.10 feet to a point on X 't concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 87°51'02" West, a distance of 2,769.79 feet there lrs rt along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,769.79 feet, through a central an 9", subn # chord of 176.14 feet at a bearing of North 00° 19'38" East, for an arc length of 176.17 f t o end of said curve; the 01 °30' 15" West, for a distance of 153.94 feet; thence South 89°40'50" East, along No dary of said Tract 18, r a distance of 49.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 26 Parcel 3: All of Tract 119, GOLDEN Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of G to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Bo .0/ r plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, I taken for road right of way pursuant per County, Florida. INSTR 5705299 OR 5623 PG 3977 RECORDED 4/30/2019 10:45 AM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $3,500.00 REC $18.50 CONS $500,000.00 THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT OPINION OF TITLE BY: Matthew L. Grabinski, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 Folio No.: 37698520004 THIS WARRANTY DEED, married man, and Consiglio N. Gip Partners I, LLC, a Florida limitedi Attn.: David Genson, Naples, Fforb WITNESSETH that DOLLARS ($10.00) and oth receipt whereof is hereby Grantee's heirs and assigns property situate, lying and be Tract 120, Golden Gatt Plat Book 7, Page 84, of WARRANTY DEED a married ma( company, whose County of Collier, Subject to: (a) property taxes fo l restrictions and public utility e; governmental regulations. Unit 22, ac records of 2019, between Larry Valente, a ively, the "Grantor"), and BCHD is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, sum of TEN AND 00/100 in hand paid by Grantee, the ild to the said Grantee and >cribed as follows, such real wit: ;.flat thereof recorded in , Florida. 1,s ubsequent years; (b) covenants, ; and (c) existing zoning and The property is not the homestead property of either grantor, nor is it the homestead of either grantor's spouse, and the property is not contiguous to the homestead of either grantor or either grantor's spouse. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with the Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey this land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to the land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his or her hands and seal the day and year first above written. Warranty Deed Pagel of 2 *** OR 5623 PG 3978 *** Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of (as to both): Print Name: (i&o Ci 0 /-RP Print Name: 0, h U STATE OF 1 1\ COUNTY OF V 2 The foregoing instrument was acknowledge Valente and Consiglio GGiirurastante, who,ax `i e e ym as identification. ,N NOTARIAL SEAL LEAH BLANDO, Notary Pub' Lansdale Boro., Montgomery C My Commission Expires July 31 GRANTOR: Warranty Deed Page 2 of 2 Larry Va ente OAF CA Rom WIA 11P day of - ems, 2Q19, by Larry irlip or who have produced tl1f'ye,c z< Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER GMPA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Please see attached Exhibit A - S22, T48, R27 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37698440003,37698480005 and 37698360002 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right of -way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Immokalee Road 15-acre CPUD and Immokalee Road -Estate Commercial Subdistrict PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: Email/Fax: Sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 37698360002 Folio Number 37698480005 Folio Number. 37698440003 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by:_ f Date: 2 / 13 / 2 018 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 *** OR 5243 PG 2748 *** EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: The North 180 feet of Tract No. 116, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 2: Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS that portion taken for road right of way pursuant to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3111, Page 500, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: A Portion of Tract 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, Unit No. 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence South 01'30' 15" East, for a distance of 172.46 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears South 88°32'50" West, a distance of 2,814.93 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,814.93 feet, through a central angle of 03'12'32", subtended by a chord of 157.83 feet at a bearing of South 00°09'06" West, for an arc length of 157.65 feet to the end of said curve, and the Southeasterly corner of said Tract 118; thence North 89°40'50" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 118, for a distance of 50.10 feet to a point on X 't concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 87°51'02" West, a distance of 2,769.79 feet there lrs rt along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,769.79 feet, through a central an 9", subn # chord of 176.14 feet at a bearing of North 00° 19'38" East, for an arc length of 176.17 f t o end of said curve; the 01 °30' 15" West, for a distance of 153.94 feet; thence South 89°40'50" East, along No dary of said Tract 18, r a distance of 49.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 26 Parcel 3: All of Tract 119, GOLDEN Pages 83-84, of the Public Records of G to Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Bo .0/ r plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, I taken for road right of way pursuant per County, Florida. Proposed Immokalee Road 15-acre CPUD a mGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Coffier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collier ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: P U DZ Date and Time: March 1, 2016 9-10am Assigned Planner: Eric Johnsen Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: To, µo K-kLLe- ]ZD I S--Ctce�f P L) 0 ....__� PL #: 20160000214 Property ID #: 37698440003,37698480005, 37698360002 Current Zoning: E Project Address: No site address City: Naples Applicant: Agent Name: Sharon Umpenhour State: FL Zip: Phone: 239-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City. Bonita Springs State Property Owner: CROWN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 14.04 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: 15OI DDD 1P iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: e�7 FL zip: 34134 roject, please indicate the CoAher County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL #• Z-a 1 & D Dd 0 _2_4 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen8aluch@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@coiliergov,net F 1 George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colIiergov.net Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire Safety dalefey@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@coiliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net ElShar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net ❑ AI' is Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net ❑ arcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendail@colliergov.net Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net F= Matt McLean, R.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net _J F1 ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Michele Mosca, A1CP Annis Moxam Utility Impact Fees Impact Fee Administration Addressing 252-4215 252-2466 252-5519 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net michelemosca@colliergov.net annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 IN Mariam Ocheltree Brandy Otero Bill Pancake Brandi Pollard Fred Reischl, AICP Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Michael Sawyer Graphics Transit North Collier Fire Safety Utility Impact fees Zoning Services Stormwater Plan Review Transportation Planning 252-2315 252-5859 252-2310 252-6237 252-4211 252-2905 252-2926 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net brandyotero@colliergov.net b[IIpancake@,olliergov.net brandipollard@colliergov.net fredreischl@colliergov.net brettrosenblum@colllergov.net michaelsawyer@colliergov.net GRer CAMnt COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collier ov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@coiliergov.net r I Chris Scott, AICP Planning and zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Peter shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov,net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Zoning Services 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net f 1 Scott stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera@colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 1 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colilergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Erlc Johnson, AICP, CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 EricJohnson@colliergov.net .,�d., _�lid it S• S 3VkqAjj ��-t rt rc� �� s . - - p c�v13 p c,1 ] D C��t-�Sc�•!b&94ZCt4 [C =1-- "Z-l�W D[aEi�r,�1C IEit. Go*ier C0unt y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes Zcv) (I l f put)-k 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 fieY Caunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Applica 'on Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED COPIES REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of ❑ �� El amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments ❑ 16 Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 El Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 ❑ Completed Addressinp, Checklist 2 ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 3 EZ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 Z❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included 5 ❑ on aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions 4 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3,08.00 4 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with ❑ ❑ project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include 4 ❑ copies of previous surveys. Traffic Impact Study 7 ❑ Historical Survey 4 LJ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 2 Er❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) rj Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ LIT Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if El Amending the PUD Checklist continued onto next page... 4/15/2015 Rage 11 of 16 Coi NT county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined I ❑ I ❑ Copy of Official interpretation and/or Zoning Verification Tf ajVicP&Q 1 1 L4,r I ❑ *if located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement }The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: IL/ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. I. of the Administrative Code V Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each f�f Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiviniz Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS -- INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE Fni I nwlnlr RFuirwrRc- ❑School District {Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers t ImmokaIee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director LJ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 f PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ P D Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Vomprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,2.50.00 nvironmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application AO�eeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00,�% '� Transportation Review Fees: Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the " Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 V Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 4/15/2015 Page 12 of 16 Go)*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the S' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to: Board of County Commissioners 4/15/201S Page 13 of 16 Environmegtal Data Checklist Project Name L►?,/i°I0,kA11V1_ j f �j /S% C The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 r'D Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. t 2. J WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. WWhere native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction � �'� plans, include this information on the site plans. l 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological �J communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered e8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. Dildentify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location m ap(s) and property identification number(s) of the oft -site parcels) if off -site donation of land is to occur. v 014-Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. IF 0/07 A � Ac F oil 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous 'wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SDP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 6-� 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. DIdentify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 7 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24. e County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c.; Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. (J2�.PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? n 27. Additional Comments 28. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Project Name F,PUDA Checklist C 122) IS-,/ C I . Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the J subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G. L Application Contents 924). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 CDClearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Preserve Label- P546 4. )Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. �./ amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.17; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 65 Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H. Lb. Preserve Width - P603 Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 (7.)Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New r 8. Wildlife survey reguir� d for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) � Listed Species - P522 r�99)Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required -- P 522 010- UDDocument and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11 PUD shall include Preserve Tract section. When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC) Not in CV Library J12.PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Provide information for GIS? Additional Comments: Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. [terns in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat pock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Cam ival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ S I P I (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) GGE Unit 22 Tracts 116, 118 and 119, S22, T48S, R27E (also see attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with; legal description if more than one) 37698440003,37698480005 and 37698360002 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) N/A • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Immokalee Road 15-acre CPUD PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existingprojects/sites only) SDP-- or AR or PL # coer C01.V.ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Immokalee Road 15-acre CPUD (proposed) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [• Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour Phone: Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 37698440003 Folio Number �;76284SQ,005 Folio Number 37698360002 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Updated by: date: 2/24/2016 Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: THE NORTH 180 FEET OF TRACT NO. 116, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83-84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: TRACT 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83-84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THAT PORTION TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURSUANT TO ORDER OF TAKING RECORDE❑ IN D.R. BOOK 3111, PAGE 500, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TRACT 118, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NC. 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT 118; THENCE SOUTH 01'30' 15" EAST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 172.46 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 88-32'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,814.93 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,814.93 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03' 12'32", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 157.83 FEET AT A BEARING OF SOUTH 00'09'06" WEST, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 157.65 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE, AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT 118; THENCE NORTH 89'40'50" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 118, FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.10 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 87'51'02" (NEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,769.79 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,769.79 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'38'39", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 176.14 FEET AT A BEARING OF NORTH 00' 19'3B" EAST, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 176.17 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 01'30'15" WEST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 153.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'40'50" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 118, FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: ALL OF TRACT 119, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO, 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83-54, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EASTERLY 49.00 FEET TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PURSUANT TO ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN D.R. BOOK 3111, PAGE 500, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Proposed I mmokalee Road 15-acre CPU D mGradyMinor CMI 6nglneers • Land SurMors ■ Planners • Landscape Architects JohnsonEric Subject: Pre-App: PL2016000214 - PUD REZONE Location: Conference Room "C" Start: Tue 3J112016 9:00 AM End: Tue 3J112016 10:00 AM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Organizer: CDS-C Required Attendees: 'Sharon Umpenhour'; JohnsonEric; AhmadVicky; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor (lockha@collierschools.com); AndersonRichard; AnthonyDavid; AppersonAnjuli; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; BealsNathan; BeardLaune; BeasleyRachel; BrethauerPaula; BrownAraqueSummer; BurtchinMark; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CromerAaron; David Ogilvie; dfey@northcollierfire.com; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FleishmanPaula; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; jnageond@sfwmd.gov; KendaliMarcia; KurtzGerald; Larry.Alewine@stantec.com; LenbergerSteve; LevyMichael; Imartin@sfwmd.gov; MartinezOscar; MastrobertoThomas; McCaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; PajerCraig; PancakeBill; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; ReischlFred; RosenblumBrett; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; Shar Hingson; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithDaniel; SmithNatalie; StoneScoit; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; WilloughbyChristine Planner: Eric Johnson Fire: Big Corkscrew ■rrrrrrrrrrrarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrerrrrrrr■ v. 04 r w� FA, VA x _.:.+Y ps_ ". .�xs •5x 'P�'k: ,i t � •r .. K -#. _ W, r r y� i. 17 F' -'i1• l 'A- .= r e- �srT`' r ��. - . s .'fa• • .-.x .e�- y_x�: r , ;! w -� "+Po- s� -}.{'. •�� j, r . ",�: `..� rr.*� 48 i lh� f�ltfi {. E . �Ty_ iS. 21 Sk At r•; 4 '" ;ram '� -_ i �� ;: +^ ,�- d i:� • Tl Project Type: Planned Unit Development Rezone Project Description: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Golden Gate Master Plan to create a new sub district and Rezone to PUD to allow mist. retail/office land uses. Meeting Type: Pre -Application Meeting Preferred ❑ate: next available after February 12th Location: N.A., Parcel Number: 37698440003, 37698480005 and 37698360002 Full Name: Sharon Umpenhour Email: sumpenhour@gradvminor.com Company Name: Contact Number: Primary: 9471144 Tha Under Florida Law, a -mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 10th day of February 2020 by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., who is personally known to me. (Signature of Nary Public) x*: _. WCOM"� IFF •a; EVIR S: Map 14, 2020 "'$'go�F;oa` BondBdl}wNoffiryPubRCUnd«wllEBrs .... Carin J. Dwver Printed Name of Notary GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects February 6, 2020 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict Dear Sir or Madam: A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing BCHD Partners I LLC (Applicant) will be held on Monday, February 24, 2020, 5:30 pm at Station #71, Golden Gate Estates, 100 13th St SW, Naples, FL 34117. BCHD Partners I LLC has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to create a new commercial sub -district under the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow up to 200,000 square feet of gross floor area for commercial land uses in the subdistrict. Allowable uses shall be limited to those permitted by right and by conditional uses in the C-4, Commercial General zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. The subject property (Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict) is comprised of approximately 20± acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour at Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Project Location Map 33rd AVE NE N SUBJECT AIIVIleil RD DR s PROPERTY ��� G' ore pR Qar p 40 Sap`'I Mu�rGnO9tt O � m � 'o r C7 W Z Z LU Z N �@ �a In H r CT c N G'r n CT W � me V �? CO 25th AVE NE 26th AVE NE c C� P� Bird1ep Randall BLVD Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com �a veeevaeme_howw�wae ``a ss a "s s`sa ae'ss,v`sa�a� a§ve`a ry`ewww-Em8a`s-s-se oesm�emwaa� ^-s-so8asese^^-s ew^s ^s e--s ----s -ow-wwms ---------------- 821�`a``" ss`s8 am a<RRppI I IIammww^ RRRII1a91R$RR $R�R9PR�RRRRI RRRR a R R I R RR j i R 1 aaaFp2FR�pF�@�1 es �� w$ �a w w w 8 wad w o �o w ��ff8 40o w w 44 4 g,=g8° 3 _ ° mew s�oo w€ o I� z. g;i��--~�;��5 ��"~wda�: ��p:.p `_�:�„05; 0000w� `E~aG,o,�G x G�~g ;G��;Y��° �yyoG�wtG��G�Go tG�Goow�G�y��w E - _ oa.m��m� .. I: �_om9 om�mmmmmm°omm__�m__�mmm�tt _�mmm�_~mmm_omm- �e �o� �op�'« --p� 44 p4 �'�'44pp�� `1 '����'��zzz�w ��`�aa'<`d=�a�l wm~ » »na��`d`�_:�1z,`d`��d"`1 `1 `d imm==`��zz_`�_�zz>=��_`�_`��_ ==`��d"`1 �`d aa'��F<U zzxdazz`d wwa�zzzaayyWoWW�oo�wwwwoywwyyoia� yyyawwaau~.mw('„ymmw��~m mawa~m ~m iwwaaaawa�aa�000~ oyyayyaaioa w wwwww3w3wgg3ww3ggwwwwwg »>o>oN8ow8NM000-*-52H 0 3888 >88» 0>65 8»»»>8»88»888>8>338 88>8>8808�»»8>0»0 8> 88»M* s E 8 s ��qqa}�� a: ss��aa����gqaqqqm��� gqqq�s�gqqqsqqs�x�xqq�qq xemsqq�m� ��qqqq xgqmgqqxqqJ,m qq yy�:aq RRRRRRRR �eawexgqa�Rqq qq��:qq� £ ao��� � R RRR �y$£wa RR R R RcRa aR sa��RS iR R R o�ws �� NA RPS R -------�, °sLL,aa LLLL yew pwH LL�y - - - a aaww a iaie=- ----a dada ova dada as a �a�w aaaa as dada x a n HA wz. z 3 zw ss a U a= s� o 0 0 0 _ =1owo °°° �,�w wwwwo.w =w 33 p mow~ n wop pao ��a= - >oss - _ = p�I.=�xw;; �pooy w=°oo� - rcoos� 'm �u°i� o�� pSwwo�u���u- rc�� _ u�wa� - wz p3�N€=`�o rcm'�'rcwd°ol �gow pgou op p i9 �Da ¢prw� �w _ armri�= J-�Oxi��py�iww���Wv�u�° p>�osw_000 z�sop ���pooaU�=��€ww�hH<"��o3�<w� H;�wo����og„'s6o �nn���4mxx�x� ° ���~_� w��"�����o�aa�ma� zw - m w ~ tz~°Src�a po 6w °_�w=o "-' o.o����m mm o _ =x ~ 3 pa wx��p wss�o _ op �o= op�p NVU °pw m ~ p 3z� m ��bo 3 m www s °° s�>wFbw°= o ow°w="=' �w wwmmm - _ jog <am x�� =`w£oFw m "wow= o�`= xa�pw ws�wE "ercrc � � a��= S€w w3owp: o�'<"g "=pgy }UN worm ~pv„ "s b� �ww-pF,x °�, _=m�.wpww&&& &&N '<- �saoprcpa> "$� w"a' �p~Ww3pF�'wUw 'a- wapo =�=w w ,N'=o`m= =Sao_0000p=LLLL =aawy��pyo=w�v spw�pw0 - - H pw ��� - = _�� o< 3 HE w -� �kww - wa= o m wy�FF<�° me> ° m�awmmm-wwmmmmm s`s °°-°°°°°°oo°00000°wwwwwwww ° w=====__ �ryxxx EEE= ... R EEE� --oo� �aeme�emm��eee-ee�ae-emm��n®e i 3 b „o so so 000x���WU. VQ��m� C 1w�wssmw���3�sws� A AXXwAAAmXXzz z'°XXXAXXXwm'��XAAzX Mi 333 � a XXX Ewe sib E o�o,.W� woIo�oo _ pM. p$���mm - poops °00000a LL - - oSSm" 38„„An„"aa8am��a'x YmH H UFaa is ooU3o$ 3iwo'o'�'q�ES��s€ a ww myQo�sssp�3 aaaaapppppppp"�Hq:.» » ii3o8 2i7i2o2o NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing BCHD Partners I LLC (Applicant) will be held on: Monday, February 24, 2020, 5:30 pm at Station 471, Golden Gate Estates, 100 13th St SW, Naples, FL 34117 BCHD Partners I LLC has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to create a new commercial sub -district under the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to allow up to 200,000 square feet of gross floor area for commercial land uses in the subdistrict. Allowable uses shall be limited to those permitted by right and by conditional uses in the C-4, Commercial General zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. The subject property (Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict) is comprised of approximately 20± acres, located on the west side of Immokalee Road approximately one-half mile north of Randall Boulevard in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375. NDAp?d0.'+91-1 lim NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20160000221/CP-2018-4, Immokalee Road -Estates Commercial Subdistrict February 24, 2020 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be aavLseci*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: l-j , t I l i J" d 11 4-tq EMAIL: JAW 4ILr7-0/L/ L9 CJ7 ADDRESS: PHONE: . NAME: }( �q EMAIL: (47be-f E1vAI�•C�� ADDRESS: 110 rr) ��` N PHONE:Z8 -7-?+ NAME: Oorbyl d 1 EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: �+'I('I`C e fT1I�-��One_ EMAIL: A�, •_fl0/Ic�J`%�iGec'��t�!�,c�rh ADDRESS: r� g c' - 7. PHONE:�2 22 71 NAME: /J 14, Z7- / Afle- EMAIL: ADDRESS: I�R 91C 17'0 15 - /I xF PHONE: NAME: 0 EMAIL: ru L0 ` 0 4 i� I':A - 1= 1 >M y y ..7,61, A6; 4 4 3 ADDRESS: PHONE: jo�v X16 a?J s — 65 NAME: 7:S-yV1 y-\ Fk,-e- Vv--e, EMAIL: ADDRESS: 2 c, it) L4 fl. � �� PHONE: NAME: �Y � vv-� j EMAIL: ADDRESS: 2 q 1(j q (1, cT �1i1t---•-__. PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 02-24-2020 W� N O O O O •o O N J CL i O CL 4� O H W 1 O w z 0 4- 0 E 0 0 0 0 Z 0 N O N N N I il V) Q) O U O Ln Ln Q O C3 Q CL vi O O 0) V) O V 0 U Q) I L N N W u L W CL CL V_ Q 0 V L a E L Z cz— Q) Q) W CL I N 0) O 0 V W i E a J V i m 4 U •U Q) Q) E O i E -� Q) v, O .0 W U U OLn .i O O O Q) -� JQ �W �O— •_ _ 4� 0 Q) • U 0 O Q) Q) U E O Q) U Q� w� WDU -� O • • vs w + a� y � w N U � O � O •• 4� O } LL. O L w N Q LL. 'D V .� } O O O •`n O •O LM W C V CL CL M T N � _ N O Ln O • N O U N~ > a)oDo— �� >n o = O = O O oQ) Q O V' �� O N� Q O Q ,� C04 D • `� p cn O } O U V) 4- N >�� � J N N .� O D V O m •� O N p X _ U Q O •L ON O N 0 N N E pE N O �U N� O •� O 0 0 N E _ W p O O Q N 0 0 D I L w .N O O O U O N H �• 000 -0 N=C Uo 0 � D N N O O— In O O N �Q EE00 O E E O N CL a0�-- �� O -0 U . . T a� X V (2-U U � m D O U� �� �O a� •�, Qo" •E o, o o N U E o 0 O N N � o oU O o Q� U O � � O O •L- Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay. Well, good evening everybody. It's 5:30 and we're here for a Neighborhood Information Meeting for, uh, uh, land use petition. It's called the Immokalee Road Estate. It's a commercial subdistrict. I'm Wayne Arnold and I'm a professional planner with Grady Minors & Associates. Sharon Umpenhour is sitting back here. She's recording the meeting, which we're required to do by county, um, rules. Uh. With us tonight is Corby Schmidt. He's the principal planner with Collier County government. It's our meeting, but he's the staff representative here that's handling the project and he's happy to try to answer questions if you have some that are staff or process oriented. Uh. Austin Howell is standing over on the side. He's with Barron Collier Companies, the applicant, Bruce Layman, is with Peninsula Engineering and he's the ecologist working on the — the project. And this is Norm Trebilcock who's the traffic engineer with Trebilcock Planning Solutions. Norm Trebilcock: Oh. I don't know about that. [laughs] Wayne Arnold: We're here to give you a brief presentation of — of what we're doing. And we're modifying the Golden Gate Master Plan to make provisions for this 20-acre property to become eligible for commercial development. We're not rezoning the property through this action, but we're trying to re -designate on the land use plan for this property to have, uh, commercial uses of general commercial intensity. It's called C-4 Commercial through Collier County's, uh, land use code. But um... So, right now it's designated estates, which means it can have either a certain limited number of conditional type uses, whether that would be churches, childcare, schools, et cetera, or it could be residential. We're proposing to change that to create this commercial subdistrict so we can qualify to come through a rezoning process to establish, uh, commercial zoning and have a true masterplan. The property... Most of you obviously got notice if you're one of the more immediate neighbors. It's, uh, highlighted here. It's 20 acres of assemblage. Most of it's on Immokalee Road. It's right at Orange Tree Signal. That's the easiest, uh, location for me. It's center of the site. This is a blow up on the right side just showing properties. It's completely vegetated today and there's no other structure on it. So, our intent is to establish a commercial node at that location. Page 1 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM The property to the south, we call it the Randall Curve Property. It is owned by Collier County government and then that's under contract by, uh, another lot — another developer who is looking at doing mixed use commercial and residential on that track. And that's circulating through the process of applications filed for that property. Um. This is what we're actually — this is the — the cuts of our application. This is the language that's pending today. It's subject to future modification as the county staff, uh, continues to modify this. But it essentially says, "This is the estate's, uh, commercial subdistrict. Uh. We're going to rezone it to a plan development in the future. Um. We're going to create standards for architectural theme and other development standards to ensure compatibility with our neighbors. Uh. We're allowed uses in the future that are by right and conditional uses of the C-4 commercial zoning district." Which it's probably one of the largest commercial zoning districts. It allows everything from light offices up through restaurants and... Enrico Avallone: Concrete plans? Wayne Arnold: No concrete plans. And then, we're limiting to a 200,000 sq. ft of gross floor area. And that's kind of the standard in Collier County that is asked for. 10,000 sq. ft per acre, which gets us to the 200,000 sq. ft number that we're proposing. And again, this action that we're going through, from the county's perspective, it does not allow us to have these uses by right. We still would have to go back through a separate zoning process. We'll have to do another Neighborhood Informational Meeting for that process. Show you a master plan of development. And that's the point at which, you know, there might be certain conditions of d — of approval that staff would be looking for. And those could be everything, you know, from lighting standards to access location and things of that nature that we deal with. Um. All of this information can be found on our website, gradyminor.com, under our planning tab. They're also available through the colliergov.net site through a proj — through a portal they call CityView. And our next steps will be we have tentative hearing dates set up. There's — the process we're in, it's confusing, but it's — it's required under the statute to have a transmittal hearing for a comp plan amendment. So, the county commission and the planning commission will hold transmittal hearings. At which case they will decide whether to transmit the Page 2 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM application to the State Department of, uh, Economic Opportunity. The state then gets three days to review these, come back with any comments. And mostly those are related to any state agency related things. Um. Typically they've not been commenting on projects of this scale, but that's a part of the process statutorily they're allowed to do that. And then, it would come back and then we'd go through what is considered an adoption process. And then, that would go back again through the planning commission and the board of county commissioners. And in this case, the board has the final decision -making authority on it, and we need to get four out of five votes at the county commission to adopt a land use change as we're proposing tonight. So, that's kind of in a nutshell what we're proposing to do. And I'm sure you all have some questions. We're here to try to answer those. Alan Frazier: What do — what do you want to put on there that you can't — that you're not zoned for now? Wayne Arnold: Well, right now we're zoned for single family dwelling units and we're zoned for — we could come through the process for condition use for certain things like a church, or a school, or et cetera. It does not allow any conventional commercial that we're proposing to do. Um. And we did a marketing study that's, um — Alan Frazier: What — what are you proposing to do? Wayne Arnold: Well, we don't have any definitive plans yet. Austin and his group are looking at that. They're out there talking to different, um, prospective commercial users. There's a lot of interest in this corridor because 1) there's a lot of graphic on Immokalee road. So there's a lot of opportunity to capture trips that are on the road, so people don't have to go all the way back into town for goods and services. And, you know, they're looking around. There's, uh, the public shopping center that's the most recent addition to the commercial out here. It's very successful. There are other grocery stores who are looking to be in this corridor, but the process we're going through. I mean, we started this process in 2016, so this isn't a quick process. So, the process of getting through this takes anywhere from a year to sometimes two years or more. This one we kind of put it on hold trying to determine what was going on with the county property to the south of us. Any questions? Page 3 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Phyllis Litka: So, what's going in across from, um, the Orange Tree. The public's already — they were supposed to do the sanctuary and now they're not doing that. What's going in there now? Wayne Arnold: Well, the county's, um, under contract with, uh, a local gentleman who is going to be going through the process to — the same land use change process, as well as a rezoning for this property that will be tied to another property down at Wilson and Golden Gate. And it's not, obviously, part of this application, but the idea is to have more commercial and some residential in that location. Um. And that's yet to be determined how much of that. But again, you have — in that case, the reason this is seen as good potential for commercial is 1) There's a demand for commercial in this area. 2) It has really good access because it has signals, uh, at Orange Tree and again one at, uh, Randall. So, that provides really good signalized access for having that type of intensity at this location that isn't offered in a lot of other locations on Immokalee Road. And again, in talking to the Civic Association and others, you know, the idea was to not have commercial penetrate Golden Gate Estates et cetera, but to keep it on the perimeter. So, if you can keep it on Immokalee Road, you don't have to have those smaller intrusions of commercial into the interior. Even though, you know, the estate shopping center, which was approved several years ago and has not been built, that was viewed as a good example of, "Hey, its inside the — the center of the universe for Golden Gate Estates." But the residents really think the — prefer some of that commercial to be up on Immokalee Road rather than have so much commercial down at Wilson and Golden Gate. So, that's — that's why we're here. And Austin, I don't know if you want to add anything else to the discussion. Austin Howell: Not really. I think you got it all. Phyllis Litka: What — what type of commercial are they talking? Like a big box store? I mean, something that's 10 — 20,000 sq. ft. Wayne Arnold: Well, we're asking for 200,000 sq. ft total as part of this 20 acres. And that obviously is, you know, potentially a big box store. You know, just my experience is that the big box stores are not in an expansion mode, so I don't know that we're going to deliver one. The C-4 zoning would allow one, but, um, you know... Page 4 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM But it also allows the gambit of things that we've heard people say they want, restaurants, hardware store - whether it's a big box hardware store or, you know, something more local. Those are permitted type uses. Office buildings, medical office. All those things are things that we've heard that residents want in this part of our community. Yes, sir? Enrico Avallone: What is your need for a little poke that sticks out? Wayne Arnold: That was — honestly, I don't know the history of it, but it was just part of the assemblage that was available for the vacant land — Enrico Avallone: Yeah. Wayne Arnold: — vicinity. Enrico Avallone: Because I can tell you that the people of the street are not gonna wanna see a road put through there or anything like that. Wayne Arnold: And we're not at that stage yet to determine all of our access. I think we know that we're intending to use the signal access on Immokalee Road. I don't know what the county's position would be for us to even try to use 4th as an access point. Enrico Avallone: Yeah, because it's right across the street from me and I don't want to see that. I'd rather see you cut that off and sell it to one of the people on the street and just use the rest of it for a big box store or whatever. Wayne Arnold: Sure. Enrico Avallone: Because, I mean, yes. We do need amenities out here, but we do not need a "Oh, let's get, you know, the big trucks to —" Wayne Arnold: Sure. Enrico Avallone: "— supply the thing —" Wayne Arnold: Understood. Enrico Avallone: "— in through the back yards of everybody who lives on that street." Wayne Arnold: That's understood and that's something that we're clearly — Page 5 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Enrico Avallone: The road is already crumbling in areas — Wayne Arnold: Hmm. Enrico Avallone: — because it's not taken care of well enough. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Enrico Avallone: And, uh, you know, having big trucks, you know, big raise and what not barreling down my road where we've got kids and what not. Wayne Arnold: Sure. Enrico Avallone: Playing, you know, you don't want to see it tearing up the street even more. Wayne Arnold: Oh, of course not. Enrico Avallone: So. Wayne Arnold: And then something — like I said, this stage of the process is really to allow us to come through a zoning process. And at that point we'll have a plan that truly depicts our access locations. We'll work with the neighbors again. As for the neighbors, we can — I can't promise you today that access is prohibited there. There may be a reason that the county wants us to do that. Which, in that case, we'll be dealing with that and you. But I'm not — I'm not saying we will, but I'm just saying that that is part of the process that we'll have to evaluate as we move ahead. But I fully understand that, you know, there are other utility functions that we can utilize that. We have open space requirements. We need water management areas. We have native vegetation preservation requirements. Enrico Avallone: And also, if you just preserve, leave it as is, that's... Wayne Arnold: I can't promise you tonight that that's what it will be, but I mean, those are uses that are — have utility to us beyond just an access point. Yes, sir. Richard Brewer: A map that was on your website, you've got a 300-foot radius that goes all the way around it. what exactly is that? What's that for? Wayne Arnold: I'm not sure which exhibit you're looking at. Page 6 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Richard Brewer: On the website. [shuffles papers] Wayne Arnold: That I think was just an offset that Sharon did to show surrounding land uses. This is part of their county's application process so we can identify the uses that are around the site. But the notice requirements are larger than 300 feet, so every way within — is it 1,000 feet — Sharon Umpenhour: 1,000. Wayne Arnold: for this part of the community? Yeah. Phyllis Litka: So, what you are saying is you're off of 4th, I take it? Enrico Avallone: I — if you look at that, uh — can I step on the floor? Wayne Arnold: Of course. Wayne Arnold: Or you can use my pointer if you want. Enrico Avallone: Yeah, man. Wayne Arnold: It's little button is a red pointer. Enrico Avallone: I am — okay. So, this is my house. This is my neighbor Jonathan. Just walked in the building. I am right here. I have a neighbor who owns all of this. Richard Brewer: Which is me. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. [laughs] Enrico Avallone: All of that. So, I mean, we are right all along here, and we don't want to see trucks — big trucks coming in and out of here as is. It's already, you know — the road is not the greatest. Wayne Arnold: Mm-hmm. Enrico Avallone: And, uh — Wayne Arnold: Sure. No, understood. And like I said, this — this really is a Enrico Avallone: If that stays woods, then, you know, that's — that — that's for me, my biggest concern is that little click of land. Page 7 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Wayne Arnold: Understood. Yeah. We'll see — Enrico Avallone: What you put over there, if you can get a Home Depot in there or something like that, I'm all for that. Wayne Arnold: I think Austin would love to have that, too. [laughs] I just know we're not there yet. Enrico Avallone: Yeah, I know we're not there yet. But I mean, it's like I said. My concern is that poke of land. Wayne Arnold: Understood. And we'll be obviously communicating with you through the next step of the process when we come through the zoning process with this. And gentlemen, I know that you all just stepped in. Just gave a brief presentation on the project. Enrico Avallone: This is John who owns just north of the poke. Wayne Arnold: Gotcha. Enrico Avallone: Or I mean up. Up from the poke. Wayne Arnold: Right. Enrico Avallone: Yeah, that is north though. Wayne Arnold: It's technically north. [laughs] I know it's hard to... Enrico Avallone: I can never tell with maps. Wayne Arnold: Any questions? Phyllis Litka: Are they going farther down Immokalee Road with all kinds of rope and commercial? Or this is... Wayne Arnold: Corby, I'm not sure of any other applications that are pending, other than I know the Curve property is, you know, being considered for mix use. But I can't speak to the north. Corby Schmidt: None that I know of that are pending, but in this area, you have an abundance of commercial uses planned or zoned already. Uh. So. Alan Frazier: Isn't there — Corby Schmidt: You would expect — Page 8 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Alan Frazier: Corby Schmidt: Alan Frazier: Corby Schmidt: Alan Frazier: Corby Schmidt: Wayne Arnold: — your mall's supposed to be just a little east of that? Say again? Is your mall a little east of where this is at? Haven't they approved that? I don't know. On Immokalee Road. At — not the mall itself, but the property that it would sit on, that's approved. Yes. Richard Brewer: Briefly when they were talking about that whole area, that Randal Curve property, and then access through your property across Main Street. Wayne Arnold: Correct. Richard Brewer: And is that on your — in the planning? Wayne Arnold: I think that's certainly something we're — we're talking about because I think that there used to be some cooperation and access management. The county's going to encourage us to interconnect with a like property. So, if there's commercial on the property we're talking about tonight and there's commercial approved to the south, I think there's going to be strong encouragement from the county. They have policies that talk about interconnecting sites and obviously getting access to signals and port for both properties. Phyllis Litka: When we sit on our lanai on 2nd, and we have the canal, and then you guys are 4th — Alan Frazier: Mm-hmm. Phyllis Litka: We can hear all kinds of traffic down Immokalee Road. We can hear whatever's happening at the high school, whatever's happening at the fairgrounds, and now if they do these big stores, we're talking 3:00 to 4:00 in the morning. Wayne Arnold: Well, those are some of the things too that as you go through the zoning process, sometimes there are hours of operation standards, uh, delivery hours, standards that we can look at. Lighting Page 9 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM standards. Those are pretty common things that get evaluated at this part or not. Alan Frazier: Yeah, but all that I over once it's approved to build. Wayne Arnold: Well, not really. I think the county — those things get codified in an ordinance. And that's a law. So, if you're violating the conditions of your approval, the county has recourse against the property owner. Alan Frazier: Okay. And exactly how much more traffic can we stand? Norm Trebilcock: As far as, uh, north? Wayne Arnold: Why don't you introduce yourself since you haven't spoken yet. Norm Trebilcock: Yep. Wayne Arnold: Just so that recorder knows who's talking. Norm Trebilcock: Yes. So, my name is Norm Trebilcock. I'm a professional engineer and certified planner. And so, I prepare the traffic study for the projects. So, we do have a traffic impact statement that we prepared for it. And so, when we did that, I based the traffic on a 200,000 sq. ft shopping center. That's the maximum amount of use we'd look at. And so, the total like net amount of traffic in terms of peak hour that this site would generate would be 681, uh. I'll just double check that. 681 p.m. peak hour trips from the project. Enrico Avallone: Can you find that? Norm Trebilcock: And then, we distribute those trips around the road network. Yes, under there. Alan Frazier: Is it gonna need more work on it? Norm Trebilcock: Yeah, trips. But that would be — you know, really the idea is that traffic would service the area. You know, so, you know... Hopefully ideally reduce this. Vehicle's mile travel, but that would be the net amount. Wayne Arnold: You have questions? Enrico Avallone: No, I just didn't know what that, uh — that term that you used, uh, to define the p.m.... Page 10 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Norm Trebilcock: ...p.m. peak hour? That's the one that is p.m. peak hour. And p.m. peak hour is — is 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. typically. And that's usually looked at as that's the heaviest travel on the road network. Enrico Avallone: And you're saying during that time how many cars you expect to see here? Norm Trebilcock: 681 seeing in peak hour. Enrico Avallone: So, an extra 681. Norm Trebilcock: It'll be two-way traffic coming and going to the site. Enrico Avallone: Right, right. Norm Trebilcock: Yeah. Enrico Avallone: The reason I ask that is because we are already know that this — this whole area here... I mean, like I said, it's going to get developed. We know that, but this area is also a cluster of fun, is the term I'm going to use, of — of traffic. Norm Trebilcock: Mm-hmm. Enrico Avallone: In that area. I mean, you know what I mean. It's — it is a traffic nightmare there. Um. Norm Trebilcock: Yeah, the count — like the Randall Boulevard — Enrico Avallone: Especially the Randall — the Randall boulevard. Norm Trebilcock: — is being studied now, um, for improvements. Enrico Avallone: That needs to be widened — Norm Trebilcock: Yep. Enrico Avallone: — at least two each way, but I would expect even three each way. Immokalee Road is going to be needing — especially if you're going to put all this other stuff here. And we have that other, uh, residential that's going down. Was an oil well or... Phyllis Litka: The Village or whatever. Enrico Avallone: The Village, exactly. All that. The amount of traffic we're getting through here, we need these roads widened even more. I know Page 11 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM there was at one point a talk of an overpass over here. Just a — to make things run smoother. Norm Trebilcock: Yeah. Enrico Avallone: Just don't put a roundabout. Don't do a roundabout, because it was a nightmare. Norm Trebilcock: No, part — part of the improvements that the county is planning for improvements on Randall Boulevard at Immokalee like you're talking about. Enrico Avallone: Right. Norm Trebilcock: So, there'd be kind of a short-term fix. What we call that grade, it'd be a turn lane improvements to improve the capacity like you're talking about. And then, the long-term improvement is potentially an overpass like, uh — Enrico Avallone: When can we expect a long-term improvement? Because we did a short-term improvement just recently there when you put three turning lanes from Randall onto Immokalee Road. And I can tell you it's still backed up there. I mean, I have friends who live down there and it's backed up to, uh — what is it? Uh. What's that first major street there? Phyllis Litka: 16th? Enrico Avallone: 16th and even beyond that. What's the — the one that goes, uh, um... Phyllis Litka: Evergreen? Enrico Avallone: Everglades, yeah. Phyllis Litka: Everglades. Enrico Avallone: I mean, it gets backed up to there sometimes. That's miles. Norm Trebilcock: And the planning rising that we looked at, we're looking at a four - lane improvement of Randall itself in that — in that section there. And that's what we call the accurate improvement since the number of turn lanes and — and in the county, they do have a — there is a masterplan. It's actually on the county's webpage. It shows those Randall improvements and then it shows the longer Page 12 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM term. The longer term, though, is — is many years off though. It's outside of what we call the planning horizon from this. Which is like five years is what we typically look at. Wayne Arnold: And I think too just, you know, from a traffic standpoint, one of the ideas is to capture some of the trips that are in this part of the area, so everybody isn't so — so, um, necessarily going back to Collier Boulevard or even farther in town. That you can get goods and services here to keep you out here. So, at least, if nothing else, your vehicle trips can be shorter. Norm Trebilcock: That's a good point. Phyllis Litka: Oh, that makes sense. Yeah. Norm Trebilcock: They call it — yeah, vehicle mile travels. So, people don't have to go into town. So, in the sense, it is a trip — a traffic generator, but it is really what we call an attractor. It brings folks in versus a residence, you call it generator. The moment a home is built, you're generating new trips versus this, you're really attracting folks from the area is really what you're hoping to do. To bring them in. So. Wayne Arnold: Any other questions or comments? I know it's — we don't have a lot of details to share with you. That's just kind of the nature of this process. Corby, I don't know if there's anything you want to add before we wrap up. Corby Schmidt: Well, I hear a lot of concerns about traffic and [clears throat] the road system out here. Certainly it won't be like this as time passes. Alan Frazier: What kind of timeframe are we talking about? Corby Schmidt: Well — Phyllis Litka: Because he's nearing 70. All: [laughs] Alan Frazier: I've been here a long time. Corby Schmidt: Well, then your concept of what it's like is more that's your context. Alan Frazier: Well, it seems to me like every time they build — they do an improvement on the roads, it's already outdated before they get it Page 13 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM done. Corby Schmidt: Well... Enrico: It's true. Corby Schmidt: Things move quickly and the way the regulations are written — Alan Frazier: That's the problem. Things are moving too quickly. Corby Schmidt: Well. Alan Frazier: Maybe we ought to slow it down a little bit. Corby Schmidt: We — we live in one of the fastest developing states and the reg — the regulations state — Alan Frazier: Maybe we ought to slow that down a little bit. Corby Schmidt: — something like we have to try to keep up with that. When the impact on the roads are there, the improvements should be sufficient to handle that traffic. Alan Frazier: Should be. Corby Schmidt: Now the impacts may immediately be demanding more. The more stores may be being built, the roads may be impacted more, and so forth. So, again, within five years there'd be maybe more improvements necessitated. So, every five years or so you may see improvements. Heck, I've been here 15 years and yeah. It seems like it's continuous. Out here where you're at one of the highest changing areas in the county, expect it. That's plain and simple. I don't know how you can't. You would want — Alan Frazier: I can — I can understand roadways, but like I don't understand — Corby Schmidt: — along a two-lane road going — Alan Frazier: — 50,000 to 75,000 way. Corby Schmidt: — between point A and point B and you no longer are. You're the target. Alan Frazier: Well, I understand that. It's gotta go up back. But why don't they Page 14 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM make preparations before it gets out that way? Phyllis Litka: Well, 28 years ago when we bought the property, the realtor said, "That is going to be the middle of Naples." And we're like [laughs], "Yeah. Oh, okay." Wish we would have bought the block. [laughs] But, I mean, so they knew this 28 years ago. So, I think what Dale is trying to say is, "But all of a sudden it just all happened." Corby Schmidt: Well, one of the things that would encourage you to do it, because much of what Wayne talked about is county plans and county planning. Alan Frazier: Right. Corby Schmidt: We have two levels of road plans and facility planning. Those that we can afford to do and those that we plan to do. And when we can afford them, we will do them even more so. Take a look. Everything is online. Whether it's transportation department or whether it's the conference planning department. Wherever you look, we have a document called "The Annual Update Inventory Report", the AUIR. It's a key document. We update is every year in an attempt to keep up with what's going on. Whether developers and Wayne and his business did nothing, there's still stuff going on all the time. The infrastructure improvements we need to make people moving around and including what goes on to accommodate incoming people day to day. Alan Frazier: Well, just seems to me like it's a slow growth now — it'd be beneficial to everybody. Not just, uh, [coughs] the few people of — well — Corby Schmidt: I — I can't argue that point, but we don't have a statement then. Corby Schmidt: True, but they haven't... Wayne Arnold: Yeah. Alan Frazier: If we slow things down, that property's going to be worth twice what it is now. Corby Schmidt: Yeah, but — Wayne Arnold: Part of the — Page 15 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Corby Schmidt: — I think 3 states out of 50 allow us to do that. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. This — this is Wayne just for the record. So, you know, to answer your question, there are some statutory reasons that things do move fast. The state has been very pro -growth oriented and pro - property rights oriented. So, there are timeframes that are established in our — our statutes that regulate how long the county can even take to do some of their reviews, et cetera and then getting to a point of once they deem it a sufficient application, they have to get it to public hearings within 180 days now for several land use applications. So, part of it is just a statutory process we're going through. [coughs] All of this can be slowed down. The economy, you know, is one of those things that really — it's roaring right now, so things are being built. Um. You know. Back in 2008, not so and we were all here crying for more things to happen. So, I mean, it's a cycle and we're in that upcycle right now and... You know, will it continue? You know — Speaker2: Probably. Wayne Arnold: — probably to some extent. Sure. Phyllis Litka: Does anyone know if the property on Immokalee in Wilson on the north side, is that zone commercial? Wayne Arnold: Mmm. I don't believe it is. Phyllis Litka: At one time it was years and years ago. Wayne Arnold: I think there was a proposal for commercial at Wilson and... Phyllis Litka: But then across the way on Immokalee and Wilson, um, that's commercial and I guess St. Agnes was looking into purchasing that property. Anybody hear that? Wayne Arnold: I — that I don't know. Phyllis Litka: That was about three years ago. Enrico Avallone: Which property are you talking about on that map? Wayne Arnold: It's not on that exhibit. Page 16 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Enrico Avallone: Not on the bigger one? Wayne Arnold: It wasn't there, um, when... Enrico Avallone: Wilson is right at the bottom -line corner. Wayne Arnold: Wilson, but I don't know that the four corners of that intersection are not shown, but that's Wilson. Enrico Avallone: So, what are you talking about? Right on — Phyllis Litka: North on Wilson. Enrico Avallone: So north? Just north of Wilson across the street on Immokalee, you mean? Phyllis Litka: Yes. Enrico Avallone: Okay. Over there. Phyllis Litka: Which is, you know, right before — you're — you're 4th we're 2nd. So, is that commercial also? Enrico Avallone: You have to go through that to get to your street is what you're saying? Phyllis Litka: Mm-hmm. Enrico Avallone: Okay. Yeah, I see what you're... Wayne Arnold: I'm not aware of any commercial there. Norm Trebilcock: Nor am I. Wayne Arnold: Uh-uh. Anything else? Yes, sir. Richard Brewer: I have a question, you mentioned that you — plans were what you can afford and what you would like. The impact these — of these — this development will generate — will those go to this immediate area since the money will be there? To the — to take care of the impact or is the impact fees just go to a general fund and they're used where they're needed first? Norm Trebilcock: Goes into district. Page 17 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Wayne Arnold: They're still impacting districts in the county. So, they program those dollars that are collected within that district to be utilized first and foremost there. Not to say that the county hasn't borrowed from other sources, but there are impacting districts in which those fees are collecting in and predominantly there. Richard Brewer: So, right here on Collier you have developed a — we're paying impact fees that won't necessarily go to improving the conditions here. Wayne Arnold: Well, I — I think it — the answer's yes. It's programmed to do that. I can't say what the county's financial situation is going to be. If there's a higher demand at some other location that they wouldn't borrow money from this district in order to fund something. But the monies that are paid here are allocated to that impact fee district. Corby Schmidt: Yeah. Wayne's saying that correctly. The impacts on the roadways, let's say, and the transportation impact fees, they're assigned to where those impacts are within the margin district. Now, whether they reach there, they may be really allocated when they're due back here. It'll eventually be here. Those specific dowers and those exact dowers maybe not, because they're moving around all the time. But they'll be used here. Wayne Arnold: Any other questions before we close it down for the evening? Gracie Moya: I — wait. I have one question. Wayne Arnold: Sure. Gracie Moya: I got here late. Um. So, do we know what's going on there? I mean, is it a store, a restaurant down there? Wayne Arnold: We don't have a specific plan. We don't have those details. We're asking for general commercial land uses at this point. Gracie Moya: Okay. Wayne Arnold: We have to go through a separate zoning process in which we would establish a more defined list of uses with development standards and all of those things. And that's yet to be filed. Gracie Moya: So, no idea what's gonna go in there? Wayne Arnold: Nope. Not yet. Page 18 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM Phyllis Litka: And nothing too soon, so we're still a few years down. Wayne Arnold: Well, we're obviously months away from this and then the separate zoning application that we'll have to follow is going to take another 10 or 11 months once it's filed with the county. But I would encourage you to pick up Sharon's business card from the table where you signed in and you can stay in touch with her through email or phone calls. And — and we have — put that back up. We have links to, um, our gradyminor.com planning page. As well as the County CityView portal, which you can view all the status of all the submittals with the county. It'll have hearing dates posted et cetera. So, I encourage you to stay plugged in. I appreciate you all coming out this evening. Gracie Moya: I really thought it was tonight that we're going to get an idea what was going to go on it. [laughs] But I guess not. Wayne Arnold: Well, I — I wish, and I bet the applicant wished they knew, too. Corby Schmidt: Yeah, and the way comprehensive planning looks at these kinds of requests — Gracie Moya: Yeah. Corby Schmidt: — we're simply changing the color on a map for any possible use as quickly as they can get to it. Now it may take years like some properties that have been planned and then zoned for it. I would assume that doesn't begin to get used, but that's part of demand. Is it a paint store, a hardware store, a grocery store? We don't even know this time. Wayne Arnold: Yeah. Enrico Avallone: It could be a Bus Barn. [laughs] Gracie Moya: No, but whatever it is — Enrico Avallone: The Bus Barn Store. Phyllis Litka: What is — what is the biggest square footage something — can they do one building that's 200,000 sq. ft? Wayne Arnold: Theoretically yes, because we're asking for 200,000 sq. ft. I can't tell you it's not going to happen, but it's probably unlikely that that Page 19 of 20 Transcript P120160000221 Immokalee Road -Estates Feb 24 2020 NIM happens. Corby Schmidt: And you have a rather thin dense view of population, so no matter how much you put there, it's too... Wayne Arnold: Like it's under your greatest possible demand. Gracie Moya: Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Everybody good? Thank you all very much for coming out. Wayne Arnold: We're adjourned. Wayne Arnold: Appreciate it. [End of Audio] Duration: 30 minutes Page 20 of 20 t 1* t 1 j Nr I it S PART OF i HE USA TODAY NE TWORlt Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 COLLIER COUNTY HEX 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E STE#401 NAPLES, FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Afftant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 10/7/2020 Subscribed and sworn to before on October 7th, 2020. Notary, State of WI, County of Brown -4 TARA IVIONDLOCH Notary Public, State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: S 1.040.26 Ad No CC10504613 Cuslomer No: 507976 PD#: PL201600000221-IMMOKALEE RD/ESTATES SUBDISTRICT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 27, 2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB - ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20t ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20160000221] A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl9oy. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey. Willig@colliercountyf1.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) NAPLSSNEWS CORE I VIEDNFSDAY, OCTOBER I ]Ole 19A Cool hoed from nevi— page petted 10 rellge r..." SI 5 million to Sill million vYhlle sl.,k haan I Maud de- fafls abeul tireOuor pone, hu)cu of such high -roll, high -joked in In, ulllly vxlw•r1 0--be of erm>idcr- lrblc she. COunt) stair hasn't retummend'd .try changes to Stock's proposal ,ten ,fly, which the devel.lp,r, has reduced m.—.l time. In An attempt lO allay co orMilt' r Thr r cm pl: �.howe a lomlrnr m Helslanwa, d,Wvn Mane 240 lot the HML de,fgn On lop .To n•Tu bill I'll, her rr- que,led a mall r-acalr growth plat) nntndmenllhal would allu,v him m build more then 37 Ttoddinui.1 units per acre — m... than twice the permit - led nin"bnr under Ill, GlTmnt awning The currrnl C-3 arming allow. IA (mils Isere arts C... Ing It III, County pl...... To puxed changes and rondillcros didn't all -11 with S,cels's dovelapmenL team Naples lend -use altumey Rich Ya- vnnnvlLhlookedc cHipemledandMel- d.d his h,Ad m disapproval during Sabo, preacttlation He asked to eras-axamlrre the plannor, than fired s series of quesllonr al him One our Yov.noWch'. first ques- tions? Why county planner, dldrit seem to take Into o sidefstwo oil or the taller lmllrOnga (n the 1lelgllbor- hMd, rcehore the Rll2-Catilon. with 13 stoder rifting ovn parking, and the TH-ce and Remington al Bay Colony, Which ore huth 21 .ruder Yovanovlch pointed mil that the caned height of thou —by Regatta ua the rnm0sideoftheaI a ti.I20feel— and acknowledged It. actual helitht Is Lde feet. He asked how the roumY could Crecr Ilghl the Regatta and find If compatible, when it's much taller than Its immediate neighbors, and not ,real One Napier the same way. Saba couldn t answer That gnratbn w almllm quesliona abort IWw the Other higlrrlao projects In the ame Coined the MUnLyl approval when they Rat next to much smaller build- ing. He ..W he wasn't directly in - Valued lnchose decisions County staff seem. to want in limit the project to the current even —lad inning end svan't deem nnything 11.1 devlete. From Ill mpullWe, Yavnw- leh rommonte0, "Nut n—S... ly; Saba an,—,.d M,wl n1.11 yrA.Mov"H, Ile• •Ilna„I .I'd .lint"elf I roll 'MN'. rr, wlloblheo h• InglMr resell ntInn n o ntd It -1, -,.,ie 11 w,r.n I r,rd'Ir IAII) mhlr..hh hxlxr • and IndxAt 1 krv.w I•. n,,.. Ih kg.11 •, nn.l thult4• tbl •auny nnwaerv'. r,Nke,S,d.• Ni! nrwsm,l our"H •1xp„11An.1 found It Lydia •LufL —1 h, bll 1„m InlluWrs, IIh II II<,NI lr vll."I INu6erhm..l.0i I 1rin.mbr0 r4.1Rnn Yrwaouvi,h dispuwd the rGennr endollnnx, oq log .nun(y Malt had aheWly will lhr developer he couldn't build rneil on the ground Oooa, ru he maid net., mcLl that ca.dui'm L Ray Noun., the county's 2onig m.nal'ir, stepped Up Io the podium m weagh In ml the dhaprnncut, "Ifig.1mg ihrro may be n way nt To,: the issue by building retail u1 u M.I. "it may or mxy not be deahll'; he Bald In e,pon ., Yavanovieh said he planned to come back and show past how much fill dirt would bcr.qui,od in •chinamn.IWUglikelhailnl the next hearing A. the meeting rouchs&d. Edwin Fryer, if,, planning nammliahsns eh.ftm.n, pnlnedout thatxt.W. I, - ommandeclnns ore lu., (h.. — reeam- .-nd.tfatr — and It'S w•Ithln fhe boerd'A pin vlew Io deride whet kind of limit$or rcqulrcmrnt. ll thinks should U. put on or .11.6od to the prujw l FrycrnlWloglecd luthc many %prak- in waiting whodlddt huw A chan" to air their view. H. Niamad thin. will he plenty of time rc rthm—and moraboard dlecus- xiOn — at the tacit hearing The board has asked for mare infor- -fion about surrounding de,ulap- .,clns to make sure they get the full picture North N.pk. resident Brut vlrl." president and r lion n1S.,eAUt1de,- hilt Beach and one or the proj,el's must ,oral opponents, geld his side wDl make• a strung Lvs. run why whorl St., k has proposed is ucilhn Lnmple- meMary rrm romp.lible with the neighbotbood Traffic, he said, remain, a big con- , despite block's planned to prrneirentx, Which emdd vo A, new im.w. n. "Ill were in his shoes, 1 would begin lucunft,mplute•tryingto Rndsome I telnWn•e to what l was asking rut; vie: lot said OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE b.INb IMCvaMw, seaeacwln<.nx•+.dv,«. en o<rw.r T, Eoao ..he fiM. oe ew ILCvnaNaNra -raw, A so Tnw Flea fMer Oawnmwrl Nw, aIM F.a Ta,.en Fat rr.pw FL me aeaN W Cwww Caewe.bmn 1aLq nA anMM oaf 60WIn.•N. Tw 9 0ronxNn<.. LWA.IA rM IMalw OfawW AN OApNAACE OF THE a RD OF COUNTY COAw.a EN OF COLLIER COVIITn a0.0k AMEN&W OMINANCE NIAIBEA -.Ail AMENDED. THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT LODi. W WCN W RVDFi TNF <OMPRPNFxrvl LAnp As ODUmOW [p11 THE UNINCORPORASU A.CA 01 COLIIER COUMy, FLORIDA. TO ALLOW ENCLOSED, MOO's. AM-CalOwrDNso aeLF- STORAGE AS A PERMITTED AE IN THE GENERALCOMs1EACIRL berms- Ic.I WHEN aa.. USE TO ME LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENYING THE FOLLOW WG: CHAPTER ZONWO ar mlelf. AND USES, INCWOWO SECMo earmaoe,AND c..---ne", emAL iTANDAPOe IOR YLGRL UK4 WCLWINO FLnw sa4a ARCHREtTUML ANO MTE uaacN aTANOAP05; rELTON PoUR C sEVERA.ILITw SECTION FINE, ,NCL11r1 IN ME COLLIFA LOUarY IANO DWELOPMEM cz. AMO..I—Ste._.G___ ��•�`•.N ., ..W.Iriw ee.<nra!f,�.lwo eIw �u. ei." ,r u. ■aAw n .r.l.u. n ..,n.e.an M pie NI Few„ +wnnp l>>Wa<>, r•n aarw law, �w" TJ <.<' ^.:n rM L<My r.raar pis :a s agra •.P..e ar.x,yrr tr+law.a .� u y me Yr.an e>m�...e.na.ran .wfn ea lO r.+W[ eAunn own law. w•m <r yrif� nae«h �dww �IXn > E»f avow r,«.Sus rraa uE+•n uc .. Pwr n rIN Nrm_r•e pros ner<.S M err v. Sur r . eo.ru >na[ r<>,an,•.r x rw time•.. clot, sou. a m�.nnm �r ....,nor .. naNnN, „Sun c .•+anus n"oe r,. „a,,...a ew.n, a [« u. roc. I ,>r«a w. C6aO.•.<awn_,r<[>R>: wr•A•> nur.Y �c p<nA-fs [u04:<r-nwx[r.ma •rya, r n to Wnwb.IAe m.a.yn�n„n1 Baer JeJr w. o-r e.yearrrrL<u n:...Ku. >• Sur.J,nti rk:A Ir,a,r�au,l, nr,r. ny>ra W„«. n a^ trr,al n aA":ee' •w Ptah manq u<a1.2 w IH.N :near era• ,raM, �n pe ,wen Far arn,sA a�an een M<a r•r n <tIV rfem cY c+a razvl5„rwn>at<Ee�+ea:(faVSMt-smMsa r .,,till•. M.wa+ -r r. nr<nrnso»r,< ul -M-pain w y>i Mn.. y1MEn t1o, IIrF nfL�u - MC'h se: .,aT -9 ,Wow W>++fJe<re>ra rnrne,.0 �n•W tre Ralne•r err Ev d d cane Car,^- On,. G MRD 1 cOUM'r LOV VIt`IC1xPe r Gr.nr a C,•aFrsCLLLn iNL4[Ne Vra, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Nolice Is hreeby green that a public hearing wrl be held by the Collier County Board of Cauity Cam nkslorMn on October 27,2020, in the Beard at County Commissioners Meeting Roum, Ihad Fim, Collier Gowmantat Carrier 3299 East Terminal ball, Naples FL ,the BGartl of County Commlubnns IBCCI will carL9der me enactment of a County R-Autiah Tl,onit iingwNca,nmencra1900A,M. The title of the proplecd Resolution is as IDlIO.: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 98-D5, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB - ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL M57Rm1, 10 ALLOW tW A PF AMIIILU BY NUM? AND CONDITIONAL USE M THE GfRLItAl CDIAIAMICFAL (Cd) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,0DO SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20. ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST 510E OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MIIF NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP AB SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL201BODD0221) A Copy of the peopBed Rewlullon is on life with the Clerk to the Board and Is available for inspection NI Interested parties are invited to allwd and be heard NOTE All persons wiring to speak on mew agenda gem must reglsler with the county mMe,priorlop,maiinl,onoilheagenrbilemlobeaddrowd Individualspeakerewill be limited to 3 minutes on any item The Selection of any Individual 0 Speak on behall of an organization our group is encouraged 11 recogmieo by the Chairman. a spokesperson for a croup a organizelArn may be 11110 mmules to speak m an item Persare, wishing 1, have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must Submit Said material a minimum of 3 weeks place to the respective public bearing, In arty caw, written materials intended to be considered by the Toed shall be submitted to the :my County 5WH a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing All materials used In presentations belue [be Board will became a permanent part of the record As pan or an ongoing Initiative to prpn,le social distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic, the public will haw the opporlun,ly to provide public comments femaldy, as well as in portion, during His proceeding Individuals who would like to participate remolely, Should register any time alter the agenda is palled on tie County webslle which is 6 days list,,, the meeting through the link provided on the hoot page al the County webule at w Lcr woe SONLIJ LS, Individuals who IegBterec e will receive IT n amaa In advanc, of the putdc rearing detailing Now they Can participate temolely In this mwtlq Fes addltlonal informaltm about the meeting, please cal Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 of,nail to Gooffrey. Willig®colllecountyl go, Any person he decoles 1, appeal any denersbn bl IIN Board will need R record of Ire proceedings pertaining (hereto and therefore, may need to ensure WI a wlbatiln record of the proceedings is made. which Nerd includes Urt leslimony and evidence upon which the appeal s based If you are a person win a disability who needs any accommodation in order to porliclpate in this proceeding, you are emitted. M No Corsi to you. [a the provision of carlein assistance. Please contact the Calhe County Facilities Management! Division, located at 3335 Tamlaml Del East, Suite 101. Naples. FL 34112-5356. (239) 252-8380. at basl We days prior to the mealmy "sled Ilslmlng,biiccs la the hearing impaired are available In Ire Board of County Carllmisiralers Orfks BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BURTL SAUNDERS CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KNZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT A COMPTROLLER By: Teres. Cannm, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ":1— ,s he ., given Chat A M.Nic hearing will be heM by the Come, Cowry Do" of Caen y Crmmlaafonera an OCtc M, 27, 2020, in the Goan G Cwnly Canmistlonen M,aing Room Thad Flow. Clear C nwll Camar. 3299 Fast T Wni Tall. Nooks FL 1M Beard of Cooly CommfaYonr, IBCCI Will consider the anscrim nl of A County Resaili TIMossing oil commence al ONTO AM. The late of lie proposed Re,oludion IN ss l0fows: A RESOLI7TION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIERCOUNIY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FORTHEESTABUSHMEW OFACONOMONAL USETO ALLOWA SPORTS j INSTRUCTIONAL SCHDOLANO CAMP FOR SHOOTING INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL CAI ZONING DISTRICT IN THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY LACE 13n, PU145UANT TO SECTION 20501 AT o 19 OF THE COLUER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A 10 774- ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE ROAD M, APPROx1.AATELV 6 No IS SOUTH OF 1-76, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP S1 SOUTH, RANGE SO EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL2p1UOWIV61 A cons' al the Fminaed Resolution Is on No with the Clen, to me Board enD Is walml, for ,•slltelwrl AI Inleresl,D TA- ere loilowl...nand and W INNW NOTE: All p„sons wN.ng to Gc i, On Any agenoa item meal reglslar Won the County rrwrogp poor to pesCnla,on Ol the e9eldailrm to be atldesaeD Inowidualspse-itw<P i be limited T03 mirwlesrnany aem The adeehon Warty intliviWN bapeakmbehwl of an. o9wiltatlon w group ISencouraged II recognized by the CrRumna, A apokeapenon far a 9r1lrP a nry.vn,Minn ,nay he,lolled W minutes to speak an 11111, F.—..'A"tolove-1 ap,.PlvC—n—l—wedmme 8—aglavrs We.. must ,ubmU saal malerMl o nvnmvm ol7 vANha pier tp IM rHpeclM public headn9 In ony case wnllrn mahr•els inH,W eD to be cpv0eed by me Surd shMl be wbm,llod IG the apO.1m. c.vrdy I.I. mi.— or seven Wye pip la In, pWNc raring All owehsfs used n pesenl,0lOns Delore the Ow.tl Suitt Mcoms a ,Asmanenl pan of lure record A, lien of e, pryvirrq inr>aaive l0 fm,rra, vocal dlilarc,rq dwirhq the C W ID-19 prMemic, Iw avNN .It have W. oradounhy to pwhde public comments —1.1y, AS wNi As ., person ovnn9 this GoN ,,drug Indv.!uws ono Wwb Ira, to pankip ate —Duly. shpAd regs,e, cry I.— after the penal ,s Polled on THE County Wseed, which is G day, blase, The loci mrouCh the I -A Mwdca an Cho uonl Dave M ,he County —bra, .1 HNYLcaliwcOVRtsIJ-pVw Indviduda v.TO rpslw nA receive - emal In advance d the conic Mwnrw ou:xr.ry Iwr, They con'-po. _n , m This meaning Fa adon.-Al on .bout Aw mwrk•9, plena ,.sit Geo.,ey Rally M 252 IIN9 a small to Geofl w. WII,YUEksIll - [,PaI. Any poison rAa MOcn to appeM any denwp, G the BPSW ,If need a mcond of the Orpc—, Well rK thnelo end Ineelos may Mw to anon, 1.11 a ver0alen mcOrd of. proceemr:gs s moue, which record -.ado the In1111xny rro avid— upon which IIN am_ is A —I II your are A person Wrm a r1ea—, <,,n mats Any accanm,oWlen to orde la pamppale n INS potcedinD you are mlrllesl, al rG Cosh to y0U le the pmv1901 of Celts, a WFanCe, Mom cCmacl The Corer Courtly Fact— M... gomml Civilian l—Nal at 3335 Tam,rn, ra[F.ail Suee 101 Naples FL 34112-SM (2391752-0]60111W 1 IWO Days prov lO the meeeg Assuu. Suovog it—. I., the Iwa Mi; rmpTeea era avplabl. In In. 11- of Counw Coo.r .—l— Un,cs BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLDER COUNTY FLORIDA BURTL SAUNOERS CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL KINIEL CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT A COMPTROLLER By TSI.•sn Crvron U, P XCkri 1SEAL1 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. I. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10,03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER SIGNATURE OF AGENT Wayne Arnold, AICP as Secretary/Treasurer for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 23 day of June , 2020, by Sharon Umpenhour, personally known to me of who pfeducea asidentification and who dWdid not take an oath. CARIN J. DWYER COMMISSION # GG 982367 Po EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 '�'tc'sit;�. , $olldW ThRr Pu611C tlndelMnfters My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Aa, Signature of No Public Lj Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 I r" i PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IMMOKALEE ROAD -ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT PETITION NO. PL20160000221/CP-2018-4 CCPC, AUGUST 6, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. IN BCC: OCTOBER 27, 2020 - 9:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL. NAPLES, FL 34112 CORBY SCHMIDT. AICP: 239-252-2944 rf FpZW Nu gar r �y 1 r Naliltr's 4:41it1j, Niatts PART Of THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 BCC COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Joe Heynen who on oath says that he serves as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 7/20/2020 Subscribed and sworn to before on July 20th, 2020: 1-Y UYA C-J2 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCH Notaiy Public State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: S1008 00 Ad No GC10457522 Customer No: 506365 PO?!: PL201600000221 IMMOKALGG RD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M., August 6, 2020, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA MASTER PLAN AND RURAL GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAPS TO ADD THE IMMOKALEE ROAD - ESTATES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 20± ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF MILE NORTH OF RANDALL BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.[PL20160000221] OjiMell Ro-- PROJECT LOCATION C: 0 - - J ORANGE TREE N- - All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to August 6, 2020. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemotoParticination@CollierCountyFL. 9_0v- Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Edwin Fryer, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Run date July 20, 2020 ND `� ��"