HEX Agenda 04/22/2021COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
AGENDA
Growth Management Department
Conference Rooms 609/610
2800 Horseshoe Drive North
Naples, FL 34104
April 22, 2021
9: 00 AM
Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing
Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report
packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Thomas. Clarkencolliercountyfl. og_v
10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a
permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County
Commissioners.
Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public
comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days.
Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name,
address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an
electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address.
Collier County Hearing Examiner Page I Printed 411512021
April 2021
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Review of Agenda
3. Advertised Public Hearing
A. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001294 - Request for an insubstantial change to Ordinance
Number 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD), to modify Exhibit B — Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for
Senior Housing, specific to affordable senior housing units for households with 80% Area
Median Income or less to eliminate operational characteristics related to on -site dining
facilities, group transportation, and devices for emergency service provider notifications;
and to provide a vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road for the
Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract where the affordable senior housing is proposed.
[Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager] Commission District 1.
4. Other Business
A. Pursuant to Chapter 9 of the Collier County Administrative Code, a consideration of the
applicant's motion to rehear petition of the Kapok St Cell Tower Variance -
PL20190002701 (HEX Decision 2021-10) for the purpose of whether to grant the motion
and establishing a HEX hearing date for the rehearing.
5. Public Comments
6. Adjourn
Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 411512021
04/22/2021
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
Item Number: 3.A
Item Summary: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20200001294 - Request for an insubstantial change to
Ordinance Number 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD), to modify Exhibit B — Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing,
specific to affordable senior housing units for households with 80% Area Median Income or less to
eliminate operational characteristics related to on -site dining facilities, group transportation, and devices
for emergency service provider notifications; and to provide a vehicular access to Rattlesnake Hammock
Road for the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract where the affordable senior housing is proposed.
[Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager] Commission District 1.
Meeting Date: 04/22/2021
Prepared by:
Title: — Zoning
Name: Laura DeJohn
04/08/2021 5:05 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning
Name: Ray Bellows
04/08/2021 5:05 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky
Review Item
Completed
Zoning
Diane Lynch
Zoning Director Review
Skipped
04/09/2021 10:30 AM
Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers)
Diane Lynch
Review Item
Completed
04/09/2021 11:03 AM
Zoning
Ray Bellows
Review Item
Completed
04/13/2021 2:26 PM
Zoning
Anita Jenkins
Review Item
Completed
04/14/2021 2:29 PM
Hearing Examiner
Andrew Dickman
Meeting Pending
04/22/2021 9:00
AM
Packet Pg. 3
3.A.a
•
Co -ier County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: APRIL 22, 2021
SUBJECT: PDI - PL20200001294; HACIENDA LAKES MPUD SENIOR HOUSING
Also referenced by project names: Villa Verde /Allegro
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
7742 Alico Rd.
Fort Myers, FL 33912
Contract Purchaser: McDowell Housing Partners `.`.
601 Brickell Key Drive #700 In
Miami, FL 33131 r
Agent: Alexis Crespo, AICP a
Waldrop Engineering
28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305
Bonita Springs, FL 34135 rn
REQUESTED ACTION: v,
as
The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to Ordinance
Number 11-41, as amended, the Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD),
to modify Exhibit B — Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing,
specific to affordable senior housing units for households with 80% Area Median Income or less
to eliminate operational characteristics related to on -site dining facilities, group transportation, and =
devices for emergency service provider notifications; and to provide a vehicular access to N
Rattlesnake Hammock Road for the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract where the affordable c
senior housing is proposed. c
c
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
z
The subject PUD is located immediately to the east of County Road 951 and north and south of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road; the proposed affordable senior housing project is in Section 23 Q
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 4)
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 1 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 4
3.A.a
PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The +2,262-acre Hacienda Lakes MPUD was approved by Ordinance Number 11-41 on October
25, 2011, in conjunction with the Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
approved by Resolution 2011-201. The DRUMPUD allows for a maximum of 1,760 residential
units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical
office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet of business park/educational facilities, a public
school, and continuation of the "swamp buggy" attraction. In Exhibit B — Development Standards,
a conversion factor is established to allow development of senior housing units within the MPUD.
The conversion factor applies in areas other than the C, Commercial Tract, and provides that one
residential unit equates to four senior housing units. The MPUD also provides that "in no instance
shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD."
In 2014, the MPUD was amended pursuant to HEX Decision No. 2014-18 to add a deviation to
allow one wall sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda
Lakes. In 2015, HEX Decision No. 2015-06 was approved for Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes to
reduce secondary front yard setbacks on residential corner lots from 20 feet to 10 feet.
The MPUD was amended again in 2016 pursuant to HEX No. 2016-20 to reduce the front yard
setback from secondary front yards on single family detached, zero lot line and two family/duplex
corner lots; to increase the minimum distance between multi -family principal structures; and to
add four (4) deviations relating to entrance signs, dead-end streets, and off-street parking, only for
the residential development known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes.
The petitioner seeks to modify operational characteristics required for senior housing for an In
affordable senior housing project proposed in the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract of the
MPUD, and to add an access point to this Tract along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The MPUD o
currently requires the following characteristics for senior housing: =In
-
1.
The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older;
2.
There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or co
catered; °a
3.
Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery Y
and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the J
resident's needs, including but not limited to medical office visits;
4.
There shall be an onsite manager /activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be
responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents;
5.
An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the =
residents; N
6.
Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers c
in the event of a medical or other emergency; c
7.
Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For
example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a
wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars.
The petitioner has applied for Site Development Plan (PL PL20200001717) for a project named Q
Villa Verde (formerly Allegro) containing 160 senior housing units that will serve residents aged
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 2 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 5
3.A.a
62 and older with income levels of 80% Area Median Income or less. The petitioner requests
eliminating the required operational characteristics for this senior housing project related to: on -
site dining facilitates (#2), group transportation services (0), and in -unit devices for emergency
service provider notification (#6). The justification provided by the applicant for removing each
of these characteristics for the proposed affordable senior housing is provided below.
Proposed for deletion: There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with
food service being on -site, or catered.
The petitioner indicates that elimination of on -site dining and food service helps maintain
affordability for the end users. The petitioner notes that the project is for residents aged 62
and older who are capable of independent living. The petitioner indicates that the
managing entity will provide assistance with grocery shopping, and off -site dining options
are within 1/4 mile of the project.
Proposed for deletion: Group transportation services shall be provided for the
residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual
transportation services shall be coordinated for the resident's needs, including
but not limited to medical office visits;
The petitioner indicates that affordability is maintained for the end user by eliminating N
group transportation services, and cities that the project will be served by Collier County N
Area Transit routes 17 and 18. Additionally, the petitioner notes that residents will be a
independent and able to operate their own vehicle or navigate public transit or other means
to reach destinations. LO
Ln
T
Proposed for deletion: Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify
emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency;
The petitioner indicates that affordability is maintained for the end user by eliminating this
operational characteristic, and states that the independence of the residents will reduce the
need for these devices that are typically found in Assisted Living Facilities or Skilled
Nursing facilities. The applicant indicates that the managing entity can provide cost-
effective safety measures that will uphold the intent of the requirement, but without the
associated cost. It should be noted that the alternative measures were not specifically
identified.
Proposed access point — The petitioner provided a new Exhibit C-1 showing a proposed access y
point connecting the Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The N
petitioner indicates the proposed access point complies with Collier County Access Management c
criteria in terms of separation and location and is limited to a right-in/right-out connection. The c
petitioner also submitted an Updated Master Mobility Plan including this access plan for
consistency.
E
Q
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 3 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 6
(indW SOV-1 epualoeH V6U000OZOZ-1d : 11,9990 :podeN }}e;S Idd SOV-1 epualoeH - LZ-801,0 :}uauayoejjv
�a ti
Q �
c�i a
m
Y
V
fC
a
Ila zo11
■■
■■■■��■_
'Enos
-_
moon
W—W■■Z■C■11ooO L0�
WCUSCR■■ooli
■ 1■
v°oi��
am■m■■oo■�
ME
_MEN
o■e
�_:
�:
■ii
ice:■
■
���;�.
�
������,'
�� � -� .,
N
0
0
0
0
N
O
N
J
CL
L
Qi
�C
C
I
Z
C
0
y-+
LL
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Page 4 of 10
3.A.a
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties
surrounding the boundaries of the proposed affordable senior housing project:
North: Rattlesnake Hammock Road right-of-way and undeveloped McMullen PUD, approved
for 185,000 square feet of commercial development.
East: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Residential (R) Tract developed with single family homes of
the Esplanade community.
South: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Residential (R) Tract developed with single family homes of
the Esplanade community & Collier Regional Medical Center PUD developed with
medical offices and hospital.
West: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract and Commercial (C)
Tract, currently undeveloped.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Comprehensive Planning: Comprehensive Planning staff notes the subject property is designated
Urban, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict #7 / Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, as
identified on the Future Land Use -slap of the Growth Management Plan. Because the proposed
change is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the
Hacienda Lakes PUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use (FLUE) of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP).
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 5 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 8
3.A.a
Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed
changes to the PUD documents. The changes proposed are specific to senior housing operational
characteristics and connection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road, which is unrelated to the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME); therefore, there is no issue with
consistency.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The
proposed connection between the R/MU Tract and Rattlesnake Hammock Road presents no issue
with consistency. There are not additional use proposed and no change to the current developer
commitment PUD trip calculation and therefore no additional impacts on the adjacent roadways.
Therefore, staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP.
Stormwater Review: Stormwater Management staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the
MPUD and found no issues with consistency.
Landscaping Review: The proposed changes do not affect landscaping provisions or requirements,
therefore, landscaping review is not applicable.
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing c
preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require N
Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of N
land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of a
Laws and Ordinances.
Emergency Services Review: Emergency Services staff reviewed and commented on this petition r
to ensure that sheltering of senior populations is addressed. The Development of Regional Impact -
(DRI) contains commitments to address evacuation and sheltering. See Attachment E to this staff m
report for the DRI commitments.
Transportation Review: Transportation staff reviewed the petition and recommends approval with
a condition on future traffic impact statements for the proposed affordable senior housing. The
condition below is recommended so that the transportation analysis at time of Site Development
Plan (SDP) or Plat accurately accounts for trips generated by the proposed housing that
accommodates independent living:
Recommended Condition e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached
due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip .generation.
N
00
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: c
c
Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code set forth the criteria by
which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD
cc
document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each are
listed below:
Q
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 6 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 9
3.A.a
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1:
a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the PUD?
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD.
b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land
use or height of buildings within the development?
No, the proposed senior housing is an allowable use, and there is no proposed increase in
the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the
development.
C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space
areas within the development in excess of 5% of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or five acres in area?
No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space
areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan.
d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to
include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation,
conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
No, the proposed amendment is to modify the requirements related to affordable senior In
housing and to show an access point from the project's R/MU Tract to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road. There is no increase to the size of areas used or designated for non-
0
residential uses and no relocation of non-residential uses. 2-
e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include,
but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or
impacts on other public facilities?
There are no substantial increases or changes on traffic or other public facilities resulting J
from this change. Senior housing units are an allowable use within the MPUD and they
are limited by the MPUD provision that "in no instance shall greater than 450 senior
housing units be developed in the entire MPUD." The governing MPUD zoning approval
also has a maximum number of trips that cannot be exceeded. The proposed affordable =
senior housing is evaluated at time of site development plan (SDP) review based on the N
number of units and type of units proposed. Transportation staff has recommended a c
condition to ensure future analysis accurately accounts for trips generated by the senior c
housing as it is proposed to accommodate independent living:
as
E
Recommended Condition e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living
Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trig
generation. Q
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 7 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 10
3.A.a
f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular
traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers?
As stated above, the proposed senior housing use is an allowable use. The governing
MPUD zoning approval also has a maximum number of trips that cannot be exceeded. The
proposed affordable senior housing is evaluated at time of site development plan (SDP)
review based on the number of units and type of units proposed. Transportation staff has
recommended a condition to ensure future analysis accurately accounts for trips generated
by the senior housing as it is proposed to accommodate independent living:
Recommended Condition e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living
Attached due to the limited on -site services to better reflect projected trip
generation.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or
otherwise increase stormwater discharge?
No, the proposed changes are related to operational characteristics of affordable senior
housing and a right-in/right-out connection to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The
development review process through Collier County and South Florida Water Management
District will require compliance with stormwater permitting requirements, and the
proposed changes do not create an increase to the overall stormwater retention or
stormwater discharge of the PUD.
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that
would be incompatible with an adjacent land use?
No, the change is limited to operational characteristics of proposed affordable senior
housing and site access. The proposed senior housing is a permitted use within the
Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) Tract, therefore the relationship to abutting land use
remains unchanged as a result of the PDI request.
i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or
Amendment to a PUD Ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use
Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification
would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses?
No. Staff from Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes are
consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Environmental and transportation planning staff
reviewed this petition, and no changes were deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the
Transportation Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density
or intensity of the permitted land uses.
j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regionaltu
Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such Q
change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 8 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 11
3.A.a
Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S.,
and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial
deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13
of the LDC.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD is designated as a DRI, and the proposed changes does not require
hearing by Collier County pursuant to the guidelines under Section 380.06, Florida Statutes
and does not constitute a substantial deviation. The proposed change is following the
process outlined in Land Development Code Section 10.02.13 governing Planned Unit
Developments.
k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or
amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a
substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.?
Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to be
substantial.
LDC Section 10.02.13.E.2 Criteria:
Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original
application?
No, the proposed changes do not affect the original analysis and findings of the original
PUD application in Petition PUDZ-2006-AR-10146. An excerpt from the staff report
prepared for that petition is provided as Attachment D, PUD & Rezoning Findings of Fact
for Petition PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) & NOTICE:
A NIM waiver was granted by email from the Hearing Examiner dated January 25, 2021, see
Attachment G, NIM Waiver.
Public notice was provided about the April 22, 2021 Hearing Examiner Hearing by posting of a
Public Hearing Notice sign on the property and mailing of notices to owners within 1,000 feet of
the subject site at least 15 days prior to the hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition PDI-
PL20200001294 per staff s recommended strikethrough/underline changes in Attachment A and
the petitioner's updated plan exhibits in Attachment B.
Attachments:
A) Hacienda Lakes MPUD — strike/underline changes, "Exhibit B Development
Standards"
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD Page 9 of 10
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Packet Pg. 12
3.A.a
B) Master Plan Revisions — Exhibit C-1 and Updated Master Mobility Plan
C) Ordinance 11-41, Hacienda Lakes MPUD
D) PUD & Rezoning Findings of Fact for Petition PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
E) DRI Hurricane Evacuation Commitments
F) Application/Backup Materials
G) NIM Waiver dated January 25, 2021
H) HEX Hybrid Meeting Waiver
In
Ln
Ln
T
r
N
O
O
O
C
d
E
t
V
Q
PDI-PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPUD
Thursday, April 8, 2021
Page 10 of 10
Packet Pg. 13
3.A.b
EXHIBIT B c
a
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
S
o
x
L
Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing a
Cn
c
a. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older;
b. There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered;
c. Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of
shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited
to medical office visits;
d. There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning
and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents;
e. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents.
f. Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical
or other emergency;
g. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may
be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be
retrofitted by adding grab bars.
h. Lands described in SDP PL20200001717 are subject to the following: One Hundred Percent (100%)o the 160
units will be restricted to households with 80% Area Median Income (AMI) or less, of which no less than 16
units will be restricted to households with 30% Area Median Income (AMI) or less. This restriction shall remain
in place for no less than thirty (30)_years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy). In
combination with the commitment to affordability, the following operational characteristics apply to this project:
a. The facility shall be for residents 62 years of age or older;
b. There shall be an onsite manger/ activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for
planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents;
c. An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and ,general fitness opportunities for the residents;
d. Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens
may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms
may be retrofitted by adding crab bars.
e. The TIS shall use ITE use code 252 Senior Living Attached due to the limited on -site services to better
reflect projected trip generation.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD
Last Revised: April 6, 2021
Words stfue r *h..,.ugl are deleted;
Words underlined are added
i
Ln
LO
Packet Pg. 14
I 3.A.c I
LEGEND
H INGRESS/EGRESS
LAKE
® PROJECT AREA = 6.71± ACRES
TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL
TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE
TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD
TRACT
IICII
COLLIER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER
HACIENDA LAKES MPUD
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
TRACT
"R/M U"
j
P
PALAC I O ERRACEI
WESTI
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
VIALE
N
WAY
N
J
a
\
o
to
In
CU
TRACT
a
IIRII
L
N
1
m
PALACIO
a
TERRACE
NORTH _
a
----------
EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: I COLLIER COUNTY
23 50 26 FLORIDA
REVISION DATE:
SHEET:
IAIENGINEERIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANCSCAPEARCHITEC'
28100 RONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
RONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
11/11/2020 P:239-405-7777 F:239405-7899
1 OF I EMAIL: info@waldrapengineering.com
Packet Pg. 15 1
3.A.c
Proposed
Acesms
Proposed \
Ateess
RATTLESNAKE
HAMMOCK RQ,
EXISTING
CAT
ROUTE 4A
EX13TING
CAT
ROUTE 4A
34B\
1
1
1
Legend
CAT STOPISHELTER
Proposed CAT Routs 4A ti 48 Extension
Existing CAT Rouse 4A d 48
Q Exbung CAT Family 4A
10 Exis" CAT Facility 48
- Exi"CAT Routs 7
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities
------- Exabrig Shared Use Pah
pProject Boundary
Development Boundary
\ EXISTING CAT
ROUTE 7
i (TO MARCO ISLAND)
DEVELOPER
1 PROPOSED CAT
/ STOP/SHELTER,
THE LORD'S WAY
/ POTENTIAL
/ CAT STOP/SHELTER/
/ PROPOSED
/ 4Ai40CAT
/ ROUTE EXTENSION
/ DEVELOPER
/ PROPOSED
/ CAT STOP/SHELTE
/
1 PROP. RATTLESNAK
■ HAMMOCK RD. EX1
evreTrun_
CAT CAT W
FACILITY FACILITY
4A (TYP) 40 (TYP)
Land Use
AttrscWn Tract
- Business Park or School
Commercial
Preserve Tract
Public Faryities Trad (EMS)
Junior Deputy
- School
Residential Trad
Residential i Medical Use
Public ROW Reservation
pedeWlan Fadlities VWU
as Extended Along AN
Internal Ras" Even it Not Shown
-- POTENTIAL
CAT STOP/SHELTER
aeiStles WWI
as Alerq AB
Internal Roads It Not shown
STATE
LANDS
�A'1 A,..
I Hacienda Lakes d�Fea . %'q :A' a
Master Mobility Plan
Packet Pg. 16
N� 1110202 msn no na
LO
LO
LO
rn
a)
R
c
to
d
L
R
m
Q
c
a�
E
t
V
R
a
g 1011727���
NUJ ORDINANCE NO. 11- 41
v 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4'I OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE
�42.92:c 2v- NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY
FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) AGRICULTURAL -SPECIAL
TREATMENT OVERLAY (A-ST) AND PUD ZONING DISTRICT
(SWAMP BUGGY DAYS PUD) TO THE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT
KNOWN AS THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD THAT WILL ALLOW A
MAXIMUM OF 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RETAIL
COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA; 70,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF
PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE INCLUDING A
CONVERSION OF RETAIL USE TO PROFESSIONAL AND
MEDICAL OFFICE; 135 HOTEL ROOMS INCLUDING A
CONVERSION TO BUSINESS PARK; 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET
OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATION FACILITY; A PUBLIC
SCHOOL; CONTINUATION OF EXISTING "SWAMP BUGGY"
ATTRACTION AND "JUNIOR DEPUTY" PASSIVE RECREATION;
AND A MAXIMUM OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
INCLUDING CONVERSIONS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK
AND SENIOR HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED
LIVING AND NURSING CARE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
CONSISTING OF 2,262 +/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF
COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD
AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS
11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL
OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-26 FOR SWAMP BUGGY GROUNDS;
AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
na
WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., Robert Mulhere of Mulhere and Associates
3.A.d
and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing a
r
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of the herein described real property. U
r
r
Q
Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC
PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Pagel of3
BCC Approved 10/25/11
Packet Pg. 17
3.A.d
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11, 12,
13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A),
Agricultural -Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days
PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for
the 2,262 +/- acre project to be known as the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, to allow a maximum of
327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of
professional and medical office space; 135 hotel rooms; 140,000 gross square feet of business
park or education facility; continuation of existing "swamp buggy" attraction and "Junior
Deputy" passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units in accordance
with the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and
incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in
Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are
hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance No. 84-26, the Swamp Buggy PUD, is hereby repealed.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25`h day of October, 2011.
ATTFCT . ,,.
PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
�i' L4 W.
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Ch&rVnan
In
LO
LO
0
a.
lid
d
W
J
R
C
N
U
x
a
c
�a
0
Q
r_
a)
E
U
a
Q
Page 2 of 3
Packet Pg. 18
3.A.d
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
— i ', �,-t )- 0(0
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Assistant County Attorney
Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation
Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses
Exhibit B — Development Standards
Exhibit C — Master Plan
Exhibit D — Legal Description
Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations
Exhibit F - List of Owner Commitments
Exhibit G — Master Use and Conversion List
CP\ 10-CPS-01024\ 118
Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC
PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 3 of 3
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1
This ordinance :. '' with
Secretary of
31 Sk day of
and acknowledgeme pf that
filing received thisl day
Of
Sy Deputy Is
Packet Pg. 19
3.A.d
EXHIBIT A
PERMITTED USES
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
TRACT
TYPE
UNITS.
ACREAGE+
TRACT "R"
RESIDENTIAL
1,714
447.86
TRACT "R/MU"
RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE
25 min.*
38.82
TRACT "BP"
BUSINESS PARK
1
35.38
TRACT "C"
COMMERCIAL
17 min.*
34.16
TRACT "A"
ATTRACTION
1
47.27
TRACT "P"
PRESERVE
0
1,544.14
TRACT "PF"
PUBLIC FACILITY
0
1.33
TRACT "JD"
JUNIOR DEPUTY
2
21.62
TRACT "ROW"
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
0
72.01
TRACT "S"
SCHOOL
0
19.55
Total
1,760
2262.14
*: Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract.
Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30%) percent of those
residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to
have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the
residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract,
or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C.
GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES
Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure
improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve
Tract.
II TRACT "R". RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES:
Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in
the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family, as defined in the
LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units,
where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon
conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in
Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD.
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
1. Single family detached dwellings;
Zero lot line, detached dwellings;
Two-family and duplex dwellings;
4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple
conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 1 of 51 Packet Pg. 20
3.A.d
Multi -family dwellings;
6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities,
assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement
communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses
for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential
units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land
uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table
II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be
developed in the entire MPUD;
Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the
LDC.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted
in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and
screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development;
Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration,
construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of
units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531);
Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health
and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks,
playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve
the residents of the PUD and their guests;
4. Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the
MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on
residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to
applicable permitting. This private, non-commercial, accessory use is intended for
stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events
open to the public are prohibited;
5. Private stables on single-family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on
residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted
to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area;
6. Horse trails.
III TRACT "RV":
In
uO
lid
a
N
m
W
J
R
a�
U
x
Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the ``
Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be
erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, other than the following:
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 2 of 51 Packet Pg. 21
3.A.d
A. Principal Uses:
Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to
the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C.
In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the
entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the
Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.03.17 and 5.5.10.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted
in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and
screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development;
2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health
and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks,
playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve
the residents of the PUD and their guests;
IV TRACT "R/MU", RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES:
Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi -family units are permitted in T"
the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi -family as defined in the LO
LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in
accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential
units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 a
square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less
N
up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or Y
SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this �
PUD.
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following: U
x
A. Principal Uses:
1. Single family detached dwellings;
2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings;
Two-family and duplex dwellings;
4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple
conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
5. Multi -family dwellings;
6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, ``
assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement
communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 3 of 51 Packet Pg. 22
3.A.d
for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential
units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land
uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table
II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be
developed in the entire MPUD.
7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in
the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall
reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.;
8. Health Services, (Groups 8011-8049, 8071-8072, 8082, and 8092-8099);
9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by
the process outlined in the LDC.
B. Accessory Uses:
1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted
in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and
screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development;
2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration,
construction, sales and marketing;
3. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health
and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks,
playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve
the residents of the PUD and their guests.
V TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES:
Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135
rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C.
However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of
business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000
square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the
business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or
BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate.
Tract "BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy
land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land
uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be
developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those
uses permitted in Section XI below shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for
development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or
used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399);
In
uO
LO
0
a
N
d
Y
W
J
R
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 4 of 51 Packet Pg. 23
3.A.d
2. Building construction (groups 1521-1542);
3. Business services (group 7311);
4. Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in
height to 100 feet);
5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799);
6. Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082);
7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836);
8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive-
thru restaurants);
9. Educational services (groups 8221-8299);
10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612-
3699);
11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- o
8748);
a-
12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, ,
2099); LO
LO
r
13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511-2599);
14.
Government offices/buildings (groups 9111-9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451,
a
0
9511-9532, 9611-9661);
Y
c�
J
15.
Health services (groups 8011-8049);
as
16.
Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546,
3571 - 3579);
z
T
17.
Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844);
18.
Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331);
a�
19.
Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199);
�a
O
20.
Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and
U
a
optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873);
r
21.
Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072,
c
m
E
8092, 8093);
U
r
r
Q
22.
Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999);
23. Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819);
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1
Page 5 of 51 Packet Pg. 24
3.A.d
24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage
warehousing only), subject to the following criteria:
i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter
buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right-of-way is
prohibited; and
ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non -direct must be from the side of
the building that is oriented internally;
iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract
within the MPUD;
iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and
v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only.
25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796);
26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053);
27. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211);
28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799);
29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311);
30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091,
5092, 5094-5099);
31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111-5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that
wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a
minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192-5193);
32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted
principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
B. Limited Principal Uses:
The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business
Park tract:
Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334-7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no
labor pools, 7371-7384, 7389);
2. Child day care services (group 8351);
3. Depository and non -depository institutions (groups 6021-6062, 6091, 6099, 6111-
6163);
4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with U
health service groups and medical laboratories/research/rehabilitative groups; Q
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 6 of 51 Packet Pg. 25
3.A.d
Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor
area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the
business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then
a hotel is not permitted;
6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621);
professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations;
Personal services (groups 7215-7231, 7241);
Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933);
9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups
6311-6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment
offices (groups 6712-6799); attorneys (group 8111);
10. Travel agencies (group 4724).
C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses:
Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right;
2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the N
following: a-
i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure
and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply LO
with fire code shall be permitted;
ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive
use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or a -
maintaining the principal structure;
N
iii. Off-street parking shall be as required for a single-family residence. Y
W
J
3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the
principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area
of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for U
landscaping, parking and open space. _
VI TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES:
Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross
floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical -related retail use square
footages approved by SDP in Tract R/MU and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor
area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract
R/MU. The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land
uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the
retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of
gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel
use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP.
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 7 of 51 Packet Pg. 26
3.A.d
A. Principal Uses:
1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple
conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
2. Multi -family dwellings;
3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units
located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building;
4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721);
5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322);
6. Advertising agencies (group 7311);
7. Advertising —miscellaneous (group 7319);
8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911-7922, 7991, 7993, 7999,
only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and
golf cart rentals);
9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611-5699);
10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211-5261, and 5531);
11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599);
12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages -automobile parking, parking
structures, no towing yards;
13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 — 7533, 7536-7549);
14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools;
15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools;
16. Boat dealers (5551);
17. Bookkeeping services (8721);
18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933);
19. Building construction — General contractors (groups 1521 — 1542);
20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261);
21. Business associations (group 8611);
22. Business consulting services (group 8748);
23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153-6159);
T
In
uO
LO
lid
a
N
d
W
J
R
a�
U
x
T
T
T
N
c
W
c
O
U
Q
r
c
m
E
U
a
r
Q
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 8 of 51 Packet Pg. 27
3.A.d
24. Business services (groups 7311-7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371-7379,
7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382-7389 except auctioneering service,
automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges,
bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive -away
automobile, exhibits -building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire
extinguisher, floats -decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling,
liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of
electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug
binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting,
shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture
designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service);
25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841);
26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living
facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing
is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing
units shall be developed in this entire MPUD;
27. Child day care services (8351); o
0
0
0
28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); N
0
29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); N
a-
30. Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993);
uO
LO
31. Communications (groups 4812-4841) including communications towers up to
specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; o
a
32. Construction — special trade contractors (groups 1711 — 1793, 1796, 1799);
N
d
Y
33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); �
34. Drug stores (group 5912);
U
M
35. Depository institutions (groups 6011-6099); _
T
36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle
clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited;
37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 — 8249);
38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711-
8748);
39. Food stores (groups 5411-5499);
40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements);
41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331-5399);
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 9 of 51 Packet Pg. 28
3.A.d
42. Glass and glazing work (1793);
43. Health services (groups 8011-8049, 8051-8059, 8071-8072, 8082 and 8092-8099);
44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712-5736);
45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 7041) only if a hotel is not built in Tract
BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP;
46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411);
47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781);
48. Legal services (group 8111);
49. Libraries (group 8231);
50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748);
51. Membership organizations (8611-8699);
52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997);
53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only);
54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 — 7699);
55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999);
56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832);
57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571);
58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini- and self -storage
warehousing only);
59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412);
60. Non -depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111-6163);
61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 8711-
8713);
62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231);
63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515);
64. Passenger car rental (group 7514);
In
uO
r
a
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
a�
U
x
T
q
r
N
c
W
c
O
a
r
c
m
E
U
a
r
r
Q
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 10 of 51 Packet Pg. 29
3.A.d
65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only,
7217, 7219, 7221-7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291,
7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and
tattoo parlors);
66. Photographic studios (7221);
67. Physical fitness facilities (7991);
68. Political organizations (group 8651);
69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721);
70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621);
71. Public Administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532,
9611-9661);
72. Public or private parks and playgrounds;
73. Public relations services (group 8743);
74.
Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); �
a-
75.
Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); ,
uO
LO
76.
Real estate (group 6512, 6531-6552);
77.
0
Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals a -
and sales; N
78.
d
Y
Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); �
79.
Religious organizations (group 8661);
80.
U
Research, development, and testing services (group 8731-8734); _
T
81.
Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261);
82.
a�
Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211-
6289);
L
O
83.
Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- v
7929); a
84. Tour operators (group 4725);
m
E
85. Travel agencies (group 4724); U
r
r
86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center);
Q
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 1 1 of 51 Packet Pg. 30
3.A.d
87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling);
88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales;
89. Vocational schools (groups 8243-8299);
90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as
determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
A. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
Parking facilities and signage;
Eating/ Picnic Area;
One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract;
4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory useCM
to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a -
In
a. A minimum five-foot, six-inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all DLO
sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure;
0
b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal a-
structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided y
which does not empty into the principal structure;
c�
J
c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the
required fence and from the principal structure.
U
M
5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more =
sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks
shall not to exceed 200 square feet.;
VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
"Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only);
2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other
recreation/entertainment activities;
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 12 of 51 Packet Pg. 31
3.A.d
3. Exhibition hall/community center;
4. Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor
recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of
occurrences;
5. Indoor target ranges, including archery;
6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized
vehicle race track only);
7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross
race course only);
8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This
use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation
Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section
380.06, E.S., or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. If
state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required
then this provision shall terminate;
9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities;
10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is
approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
1. Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated
with those uses permitted herein;
2. Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities;
3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development
Code at the time of application for construction permits;
4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for
housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the
property;
5. Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator -related facilities;
6. Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized
only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend.
C. Conditional Uses:
Fuel storage and related facilities.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 13 of 51 Packet Pg. 32
3.A.d
VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses
1. Upland preserves;
2. Wetland preserves;
B Accessory Uses and Structures
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational
signs, and information kiosks;
2. Water management structures;
3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites.
IX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES:
T"
LO
r
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
o
part, for other than the following:
a -
A. Principal Uses
Y
M
1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground
J
transportation services.
B. Accessory Uses
U
=
T
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
c
1. Parking facilities and signage;
ca
L
2. Administrative offices and support service facilities;
O
U
3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures.
a
c
m
E
X TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES:
M
a
r
r
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in Q
part, for other than the following:
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 14 of 51 Packet Pg. 33
3.A.d
A. Principal Uses:
1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to
hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails;
2. Sporting and recreational camps;
3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms,
educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or
storage of non -motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks;
2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed,
and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may
include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities;
3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses;
4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities;
5. Project identification and directional signage;
6. Water management structures;
7. Restrooms/bath houses;
8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment;
9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire;
10. Archery and air rifle range(s).
XI TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82).
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 15 of 51 Packet Pg. 34
3.A.d
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures, including, but not limited to:
Educational facilities;
2. Parking facilities and signage;
Administrative offices and support service facilities;
4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures;
Recreational facilities.
XII SIGNS:
A. Seven, on -premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property corners fronting on existing,
proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3
and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to
other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall
only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire
development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3).
B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of �
marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be LO
utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See
Exhibit E, Deviation #6). o
a
C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock
road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Y
Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) W
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 16 of 51 Packet Pg. 35
3.A.d
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
GENERAL:
Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and
applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan
(GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final
subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to
which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the
provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply.
Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to
senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and
their relation to public facility impacts.
Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including
residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set
forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of
the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various
residential products.
Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and
public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County
School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in
applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses
within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public
schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC
in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
Table 1V below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive
recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in
applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered
conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either
site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s).
Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual
parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association
boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards.
MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY:
Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a
density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi -family
units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi -family units may be constructed in the entire PUD.
Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units
shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract
C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in
either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one-third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C.
In
uO
LO
0
a
N
d
Y
R
J
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 17 of 51 Packet Pg. 36
3.A.d
LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS
Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units/spaces (not to exceed
290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the
entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi -family as defined in the Land
Development Code.
Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses
that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of
medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross
floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms.
In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was
developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office
land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park
Iand uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed
92,000 gross square feet, 704 single-family units, and 1,056 multi -family units. However, the hotel shall not
count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park.
Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding
Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross
square feet allowed in that Tract.
The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to
exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract.
The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not
to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses.
All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the
overall trip and land use cap.
Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and
multi -family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development
may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the
exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be
developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion
to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single-family
dwelling unit equates to 1 single-family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450
senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD.
Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips.
Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing
Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types
are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying
operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from
residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a
senior housing care unit:
In
uO
LO
0
a.
lid
as
M
J
a�
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 18 of 51 Packet Pg. 37
3.A.d
• The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older;
• There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered;
• Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other
types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs,
including but not limited to medical office visits;
• There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for
planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents;
• An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents.
• Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of
a medical or other emergency;
• Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example,
kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or
bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars.
Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria
• Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan.
• This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of
both.
• The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only.
• In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD.
• The density of the RV park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel [not
less than 20 acres].
• The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR-951).
• A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially
zoned or developed parcel.
Sign Development Standards
Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of
sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the
name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development.
Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the
Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of
upcoming events in the Attraction Tract.
Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the
purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract.
Site Development, or Plat Approval
• At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or
its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site
development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed
to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted
uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G.
In
uO
LO
lid
a
N
m
W
J
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 19 of 51 Packet Pg. 38
3.A.d
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SETBACK
SINGLE
ZERO LOT
TWO
TOWNHOUSE
MULTI-
CLUB
RECREAT-
FAMILY
LINE
FAMILY/
FAMILY
HOUSE/
IONAL
DETACHED
DUPLEX
DWELLINGS
REC-
VEHICLE
REATION
PARKS
BLDGS
PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURES
Minimum Lot Area
4,800 SF
4,000 SF
3,500 SF per
1,800 SF per lot
1 acre
800 SF per
lot
10,000 SF
space/unit
Minimum Lot Width
40'
35'
35' per lot
18'per lot or
150'
35'
unit
N/A
15' or BH,
15' or BH,
15' or BH,
15' or %2 BH,
15' or BH,
15' or'h BH,
15'
Minimum Distance From
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
MPUD Boundary
greater.
greater.
greater.
greater.
greater.
greater.
20', or 15'
20', or 15'
20', or 15'
20'
20' or'h BH,
10,
with side
with side
with side
whichever is
Front Yard Setback
load garages
load garages
load garages
greater.
N/A
Side Yard
6'
0' or 10'
0' or 6
0' or 6'
/2 BH
5'
N/A
Rear Yard
15,
15'
15,
15,
15' or BH,
8'
whichever is
greater
N/A
From Preserve
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
25
Maximum Zoned Height
35'
35'
35'
45'
75'
40'
30'
Maximum Actual Height
42'
42'
42'
50'
85'
50'
35'
Floor Area Minimum SF
1200 SF
1000 SF
1000 SF
900 SF
750 SF
N/A
N/A
Minimum Distance
15' or 1/2
10,
Between
12'
10,
12'
12'
V2 SBH
SBH,
Principal Structures
whichever is
greater
ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
Front
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
Side
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
Rear
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
10,
SPS
From Preserve
10,
10,
10,
10,
10'
10,
10,
Minimum Distance
10,
Between Accessory
Structures on same lot
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
0' or10'
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
Minimum Distance
0' OR 10'
Between Accessory and
Principle Structures on
same lot
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
0' or10'
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
0' or 10'
Maximum Zoned Height
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
35'
SPS
SPS
Maximum Actual Height
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
SPS
35'
SPS
Minimum Distance From
15'or %2 BH
15' or BH
15' or'h BH
15' or BH
15' or BH
15' or %2 BH
15' or BH
MPUD Boundary"
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
whichever is
greater I
greater
greater I
greater I
greater I
greater
greater
SPS: Same as Principal Structure
LL: Lot Line
BOC: Back Of Curb
Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences.
N/A: Not Applicable
BH: Zoned Building Height
SBH: Sum of Building Heights
"*Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer
In
uO
LO
r
11
to
d
Y
W
J
t=
N
v
R
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1) Page 20 of 51 Packet Pg. 39
3.A.d
General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following:
i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured from
the adjacent right-of-way line.
ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back
of curb or edge of pavement.
Notes:
1) Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement.
2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater
than 35 feet in actual height.
3) Two or three story multi -family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be
measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15-foot building wall setback is
provided as depicted in Figure 1 below.
4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk
closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be
provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the
referenced sidewalk.
5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida
Power and Light easement.
PR01
LI
Figure 1
Terraced Setbacks
In
uO
LO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
U
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 21 of 51 Packet Pg. 40
3.A.d
i
PRESERVE
5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY d
STRUCTURE SETBACK a
10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY
------
----
C
N
STRUCTURE SETBACK
FROM PRESERVE
i
I
t
t
15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 0
STRUCTURE SETBACK
=
25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I
SM
ACC''
i
FROM PRESERVE
I
t
t
t
C
Iv
8' MIN.
12' MIN.
8' MIN.
6' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL N
STRUCTURE SETBACK
PRINCIPAL
1
23' MIN.
STRUCTURE
(
f1
1
I
to
I
41
I
Y
fC
J
FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
t
— —
_
T
t
FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
iT
I I
STRUCTURE SETBACK
15'
MIN.
20 .MIN.- 23' MIN.
C
2
ROW
5' SIDEWALK--
-
L
U
BACK OF CURB
2
10' MIN.
CENTERLINE
-
- - -
O
N
O
ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
O
O
O
NOT TO SCALE
N
O
NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY
N
Figure 2
ii
Detached Single -Family Units
r
LO
i
PRESERVE
d
J
5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE SETBACK
10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY
r�/��
- - — - r - — - - — - �— - - — - - _
to
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I
t 1 t
41
FROM PRESERVE
i
t I t
15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL R
STRUCTURE SETBACK J
25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL
�C'
STRUCTURE SETBACK
-p
FROM PRESERVE
I
t t
C
(D
V
10' MIN.
10' MIN.
10' MIN. O' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL R
t
t STRUCTURE SETBACK =
I
PRINCIPAL
t
23' MIN.
STRUCTURE
(TYP') I
I r
I
t V
I
�
I
I
la
FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
- rI`FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK I
t
20 Al 3t ��1� K �
1S' MIN.
T—
MI . 0
ROW -
-
-MIL
5' SIDEWALK—
,
BACK OF CURB
U
10' MIN.
+�-
CENTERLINE -
- -
- Q
r
C
d
ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE E
L
NOT TO SCALE L1
NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY 2
r
Figure 3 Q
Detached Single-Family/Zero Lot Line Units
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 22 of 51 Packet Pg. 41
3.A.d
PRESERVE
✓���✓.�.s.1.�'J-�
5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE SETBACK
10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE SETBACK
FROM PRESERVE
I I
I I
I
I 15' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL
SRtUCTURE SETBACK
25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
ACC. STTt ACC. STIR.
I
I I
I
FROM PRESERVE
I
I
1
I
I
1 NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR
ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS
' MIN.
12' MIN.
I I
I I
I 1
I PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE
I
/' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL
23' MIN.
I (TYp)
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I
I
I
1
FRONT YARD PRINCIPALI
I
I T — T —
i
— I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I I
15' MIN.
rt 20 p I
I
1
MI MN.
ROW
-
- - -
-
5' SIDEWAU(—
BACK OF CURB
10' MIN.
CEM IJINE
- ---- - -
- -
-
ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY
Figure 4
Duplex and Two -Family Units
PRESERVE
5' MIN. REAR YARD ACCISSORY
STRUCTURE SETBACK
10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY
iS' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
FROM PRESERVE
1
I I
1 I
1 I I
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I I
SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR
KIATTACHED
25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL
I
PRINCIPAL UNITS
STRUCTURE SETBACK
1
FROM PRESERVE
I
i
II
12' I
I
MIN.
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE
5 MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL
(TYP•) (
STRUCTURE SETBACK
FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE SETBACK
I
21
5' SID
BACK OF
10' MIN.
ACC. STIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY
Figure 5
Attached Single -Family and Townhouse Units
r
Ln
M
LID
d
to
d
�C
R
J
R
C
O)
0
R
V
C
R
C_
O
r
a
r
E
L
V
R
r
r
Q
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 23 of 51 Packet Pg. 42
3.A.d
PRESERVE S' MN. RI
YARD ACCI
sETBAac
TRACT
10 FOOT NW _ __ _ -
UM �JJJJ✓✓JJ✓✓) _ \
MI _
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE _ _ _
SETBACK FROM PRESERVE
25 FOOT MINWUM I ACC. SM ACC. STR.
PRNCFAL STRUCTURE I (TYP.) (TYPJ
SETBACK FROM PRESERVE
1/2 BU0.DRKi NEIOIR AflIBK1M 1/2 TTE SIRI Oi THE BUTA
WHIMUM SIDE YARD
SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL I PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBN
STRUCTURE SETBACK
TRACT LINEN
I
FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I
STRUCTURE
ACCESS EASEMENT/ROW
S SIDEWALK
BACK OF CURB
CEHfERUNE — — — — — .
4
ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY
Figure 6
Multi -Family Units
r
Lf')
LO
f2
to
d
Y
CU
J
R
C
R
2
V
C
Ia
C_
L
0
r
a
r
E
r
r
a
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11
Page 24 of 51
Packet Pg. 43
3.A.d
TABLE II
COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
PRINCIPAL USES
ACCESSORY USES
MINIMUM LOT AREA
10,000 SQUARE FEET
N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
100 FEET
N/A
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT
BOUNDARY)
25 FEET OR '/2 THE
BUILDING HEIGHT,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER***
10 FEET
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD
BOUNDARIES ****
25 FEET
10 FEET
PRESERVE SETBACK
25 FEET
10 FEET
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN
STRUCTURES
15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF
BUILDING HEIGHTS*
10 FEET
MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT
50 FEET *****
25 FEET
MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT
60 FEET *****
30 FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SENIOR HOUSING
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — PUBLIC FACILITY
600 SQUARE FEET**
350 SQUARE FEET
1,500 SQUARE FEET
N/A
N/A
N/A
MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT
600 SQUARE FEET**
80 SQUARE FEET**
* Whichever is greater
** Not applicable to kiosks
*** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following:
i. if the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured
from the adjacent right-of-way line.
ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the
back of curb or edge of pavement.
**** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape
buffer.
***** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet
in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height.
Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single-family type of configuration shall
comply with the development standards for single-family land uses set forth in Table I.
In
uO
LO
lid
N
d
W
J
R
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 25 of 51 Packet Pg. 44
3.A.d
TABLE III
BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
PRINCIPAL USES
ACCESSORY USES
MINIMUM LOT AREA
8,000 SQUARE FEET
N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
80 FEET
N/A
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT
50 FEET***
10 FEET
BOUNDARY) — BUSINESS PARK
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT
BOUNDARY) — SCHOOL
50 FEET***
25 FEET
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD
N/A
N/A
BOUNDARIES
PRESERVE SETBACK
25 FEET
10 FEET
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN
15 FT. OR'/2 THE SUM OF
10 FEET
STRUCTURES - BUSINESS PARK
BUILDING HEIGHTS
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN
or 18 FEET
10 FEET
STRUCTURES -SCHOOL
MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - BUSINESS PARK
35 FEET
35 FEET
MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT - SCHOOL
50 FEET
50 FEET
MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT — BUSINESS PARK
50 FEET
35 FEET
MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL
60 FEET
60 FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — BUSINESS PARK
1000 SQUARE FEET
N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SCHOOL
or 350 SQUARE FEET
35 SQUARE FEET
MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT
BUSINESS PARK
500 SQUARE FEET
80 SQUARE FEET
SCHOOL
N/A
N/A
* Whichever is greater
*** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following:
i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right-of-way, the setback is measured
from the adjacent right-of-way line.
ii. If the parcel is served by a non -platted private drive, the setback is measured from the
back of curb or edge of pavement.
The Lord's Way Access Improvements:
In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the
Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B-4, a Commercial/Industrial typical
roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the
event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the
Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix B-3, a Local Street typical roadway section.
In
uO
LO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
a�
U
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 26 of 51 Packet Pg. 45
3.A.d
TABLE IV
ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
PRINCIPAL USES
ACCESSORY USES
MINIMUM LOT AREA
1 ACRE
N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
100 FEET
N/A
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM
TRACT BOUNDARY)
20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR
EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT.
OVER 50 FEET
20 FEET
MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM
MPUD BOUNDARIES
25 FEET
20 FEET
PRESERVE SETBACK
25 FEET
10 FEET
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN
STRUCTURES
15 FT. OR % THE SUM OF
BUILDING HEIGHTS*
10 FEET
MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT
50 FEET
50 FEET
MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT
75 FEET
75 FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
1000 SQUARE FEET**
N/A
* Whichever is greater
** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the
utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations
Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated
at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion.
Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to
the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an
earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit
projectiles from exiting the range area.
In
uO
LO
0
a
N
d
Y
R
J
R
as
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 27 of 51 Packet Pg. 46
s81e-1 BPUGIOeH VM000OZOZld : M90 and IN SOMe-1 epuaiOeH VP-4 � 00ueuipap - 3 JjV :}u0uay3e;jd
"VIN
Q fte r� xi ['insxo� 1HO1a;1dW 77d213A0 , , ;.�
!"i oogmlamA �azoosraa
AW 1 S.3N d % VGN31 J b'H J77 S37dVVV .1O ST1V7 Na4'31JVH - ^-
�� � 'i fmrsr tern A[7TK SV: If W T OIlL' HNMY
Y=
Y
g
M M
in
a W
5
so
„
o
O
U
.1111
K 7
w J
o
y
:
¢oeRO
x
M
�
y�
N
� �
y�•
�e
1YgYg6a�t!•yyt
�p5E€&'s
Y Y
Y
a
>
t
32F2F
�
�
��0pp+�3Ei�
t
3
11
Y
qq
Cb
a
Y
V
IL
3.A.d
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN
SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19
AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND
AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89°10'42"W. ALONG THE p
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;
a
THENCE S.89011'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 25; THENCE S.89009'39"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89°II'01"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR
2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00°13'35"W. ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE
N.00014'15"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION; THENCE N.87007'13"E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET
u
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
=
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01°08'02"E. ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
N.87012'28"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH
o
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
N
SECTION; THENCE N.01'04'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE
N
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'21"W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64
a
FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89°01'58"W. ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE
LO
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION;
v
THENCE S.0 1 0 1 8'52"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
p
CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER;
a
THENCE S.89022'00"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01°14'38"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89°01'58"W.
ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89001'58"W, ALONG SAID LINE FOR
-a
627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 °01' 15"E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89001'58"W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
u
EASEMENT; THENCE S.01°01'15"W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89'01'58"W. FOR
=
1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00°51'54"E.
ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND
PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;
c
THENCE N.87037'3I "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE
c
EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.0V01'15"E. ALONG
SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST
O
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°37'31"E. ALONG THE
V
SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST
Q
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00048'00"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST
c
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°31'38"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
E
FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°48'1l"E.
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
2
FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
Q
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°28'42"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41
FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE
OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00°48'45"E. ALONG SAID WEST
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 29 of 51
Packet Pg. 48
3.A.d
AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH
HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE 5.87°27'58"W. ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID
LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00°49'30"E. ALONG SAID
EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE N.00050'27"E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER; THENCE N.87°28'56"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.00°49'13"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE
NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87°25'45"E. ALONG SAID NORTH
LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°47'37"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87°27'14"E. ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION;
THENCE S.00047'14"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'42"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87°30'06"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°38'50"E. ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE
N.00041'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°40'34"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29
FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°36'23"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING
THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87°26'11"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
S.87030'06"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°38'50"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°32'03"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.00°35'02"W. ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR
672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°33'59"W. ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
S.00038'51"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE 5.87°37'27"W. ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00042'40"W. ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN
INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°40'54"E. ALONG SAID NORTH
LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00°56'29"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25
FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°34'58"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
N.00041'32"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°41'38"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE
S.00026'32"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
r
In
uO
LO
r
a
N
m
c�
J
m
a�
u
m
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 30 of 51 Packet Pg. 49
3.A.d
NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87033'18"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60
FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00034'02"W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'21"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88012'42"E.
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03°39'20"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88°56'10"W. ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE 5.87007'20"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR
2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87°07'13"W. ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03°18'31"E. FOR 1451.00 FEET;
THENCE N.88056'54"E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00°31'35"E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89°15'59"E.
FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89°57'58"E. ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE
S.00037'14"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89034'43"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00141'48"W. ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION;
THENCE N.89023'00"E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°22'35"E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF
THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00°52'45"E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST
HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH
HALF; THENCE S.89046'12"W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00049'34"E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST
HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH
HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89°57'58"E. ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 ° 12'08"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/-
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS:
PARCEL "A"
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE
S.00059'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE
S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°55'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF
THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89°46'12"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/-
PARCEL "B"
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00°40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
S.87017'48"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00°56'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 31 of 51 Packet Pg. 50
3.A.d
682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87°23'02"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE
N.0I000'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87°28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/-
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 32 of 51 Packet Pg. 51
3.A.d
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires
subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate
access easements rather than platted road rights -of way.
Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow
one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities
within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the
project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development.
Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property
corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign
content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather
than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b.
Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to
allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated
with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall,
berm, or wall/berm combination.
Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C.5., that requires a six foot tall
opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the
boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by
the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will
not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way.
Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC
Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract.
Deviation #7 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road
and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow
the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and/or a new sign can be permitted in
Tract C.
Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D. L that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to
0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 33 of 51 Packet Pg. 52
3.A.d
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS
For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of
Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon
Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc.
LEGAL
A. Access to Parcel "A", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD
shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public
records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty-foot
roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded
within 90-days of approval of this PUD.
B. Access to Parcel "B", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD
shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress/egress easements recorded in O.R. Book
271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page
18.
C. No existing public access/roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site
private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway
easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the
vacation.
II ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below:
Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve Summary
Description
Total
Urban ac
Rural ac
Project Area
2262.14
625.07
1637.07
On -Site Native Vegetation
1721.97
295.38
1426.59
Less the Native Veg Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext.
2.02
2.02
0.00
Less the Native Veg Within The Lords Way Ext.
0.42
0.42
0.00
Less the Native Veg Within the Benfieid Road Corridor
12.91
5.01
7.90
Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves
6.07
1.06
5.02
Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations
1700.54
286.87
1413.67
Percentage for required Native Preserve
-
25%
"
Required Native Vegetation*
<921.09
71.71
<849.38
Preserved Native Vegetation ""
1395.35
40.81
1352.57
Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit)"
61.80
Total Preserve Area
1544.14
53.06
1491.08
uO
LO
r
a.
N
d
Y
R
J
as
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 34 of 51 Packet Pg. 53
3.A.d
* Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds
60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall
be the required Rural native vegetation area.
** Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of
12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation
preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times
the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the
adopted GMP amendment.
B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for
County review.
C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan
accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement.
D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to
the next development order approval.
E. Installation of the Saba] Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to
the first preliminary acceptance.
III ENGINEERING
A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 a
over the Henderson Creek Canal.
LO
IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES
r
A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, :3
Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain
undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and
further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may
only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and
any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist.
a�
B. Historical/archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an
archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. r
V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
A. In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services
(EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility
site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one
acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services
Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of
the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of
the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later
than at the time the 5001h residential unit is included in a development order request (site
development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If
Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this
paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 35 of 51 Packet Pg. 54
3.A.d
mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be
a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the
environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted
acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to
verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite
preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement
of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any
mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water
Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State
and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact
fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to
Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to
the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph.
VI TRANSPORTATION
For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided
into three main areas:
North area being north of The Lord's Way extension;
South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School;
Benfield Road Improvements.
The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the
commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three
areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner.
SOUTH AREA
The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County
requirements for acceptance"), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial
two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida
Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the
Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in
Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over
the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here
forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved
for future conveyance to the County at the County's request.") of all of such improvements,
the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or
Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of
gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak
hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either
an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the
entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion
of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site
related improvements.
In
uO
lid
0
a
N
m
W
J
a�
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 36 of 51 Packet Pg. 55
3.A.d
Figure 1— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment I
Legend
y Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes
L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed
Roadway Segment to be Constructed
a Potential Areas to be Developed
i
U
Jlll�► L
li
fa r-
i� I E 1 nl
Rattlesnake Hammock 'Road tension,,. r,I
ResidenW. 1 i
k
Pod A �� �• c r
y
Florida Power Line Easement
lI. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits,
Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road
leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on
Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is
Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements. Upon completion of
such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land
uses:
20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and;
50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and;
135 Room Hotel, and;
Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to
Commitment 1), and;
Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1),
and;
Required residential uses within Activity Center land use;
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 37 of 51 Packet Pg. 56
3.A.d
These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these
improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below.
III. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from
the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road,
including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road
intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop
the following additional land uses:
919 Student Elementary School, and;
Residential Pod B.
In
LO
LO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
N
U
R
2
Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed Q
by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50%
of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 Packet Pg. 57
3.A.d
of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the
Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and
encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This
improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are
depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed
a site -related improvement.
11 Figure 3 — Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment III
lOgtod
y Existing Lanes/Turn Lanes
L Lanes/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed
Roadway Segment Previously Constructed
Roadway
Segment to be Constructed
_ Area Previously Developed
J ❑ Area to be Developed
v
' «t4
Rattlesnake Hammock Road erasion a�\4
- -
t
c`ResIdentwl
Residential ' * Pod B
Pod A
Florida Power Line Easement
NORTH AREA
IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and
without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the
northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to
exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the
area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4,
below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a
site related improvement.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 39 of 51 Packet Pg. 58
3.A.d
fl[ure 4 - Hacienda Lakes DRI - rnmmkrnp" IV
r
In
In
r
a.
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
N
U
R
2
V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the
reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and
construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west
entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the
Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the
cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner
and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to
Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site -related
improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to
develop the following additional land uses:
Business Park, and;
Residential Pod D.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 40 of 51 Packet Pg. 59
3.A.d
These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these
improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below.
Florida Power Une Easement
Residential '
Pod C
Residential
Pod G
Tht lord's
� r
titt>r�
Residential \
Residential Pod B
Pod Ate.,
A+
, 6
Legend
C
{� Existing Lanes/Turn lanes
Lanes/Tum Lanes to be constructed/Reconstructed
Roadway Segment Previously Constructed
Roadway Segment to be Constructed
Area Previously Developed
Area to be Developed
When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial
and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an
evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County
for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business O
Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner v
shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of a
60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits
equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County
which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy E
shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of U
Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through Q
documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development
achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be
considered expired.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 51 Packet Pg. 60
3.A.d
BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock
Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section
and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential
Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation
plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such
improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall
convey to the County a road easement for the road right of way needed for this section of
Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon
recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall
receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement
necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting
from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a
local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the conveyance of the road right of
way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent
(50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the
improvements are site -related improvements. The Cost of this improvement will be
determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner
shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses:
Residential Pod E.
These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement �
are depicted in Figure 6, below. uO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
N
U
R
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 42 of 51 Packet Pg. 61
3.A.d
Florida Power Line Easement
R*SWNtdal ,4
Pod C'
•r Reddentiall ,
Pod 0
JWPF
G-
.., ResidWial Pod E
The lord's
Rattlesnake Hammock
' kk
Residentil
Resrde+Nisl Pod B
Pod A
IL _xtsong Lanes(rum LanesIL
LanftnWn Lanes t0 be ConuructedJReconstructed
- Roadway Segment Prraou* Constructed
- !roadway Segment to be Constructed
Area Preaously Developed
Area to be f ewfoped
VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E
connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road
easement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet, free
and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will
provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement.
The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be
conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 43 of 51 Packet Pg. 62
3.A.d
i
r Florida Power Line Easement
Relidpttyl �`� #
i
_
PodC 3,.. ' s ` l
Pod0
i
. Reskimbal Pod E
Rattle n Hammock RQa xtensiow "_
T
x
�.._
ResilkatwO h;
Resider►ttal
$
Pod d
Pod A
e --
Lamm
y
E s-ueg Lanes/Turn tans
- - - —
L
Lanes/Tum Lanes to be Constructs WRecow..ted
ROMway Segment Previously Construtud
r_
Riot of Way to be preserved
Aiea Previously DeYeloped
Area to be Dp%vkoId
VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the
County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal
Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no
impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance. This is a site -related improvement. The
area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 Packet Pg. 63
3.A.d
Figure m — Hacienda lakes DRI - Commitment Vill
Florida Power Line
a
✓/ Easement
r.
�4
:
lsrsn>I
Right of Way to be Dedicated
IX. As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for
State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of
Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the
Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for
their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or
(2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater
management system. These are site -related contributions.
X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County
a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the
County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State
of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If
Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner
shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the
transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until
paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of
all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site -related transportation
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146
Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 45 of 51 Packet Pg. 64
3.A.d
improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road,
Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by
donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first
transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development
trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without
projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66%
of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on
building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and
reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for
the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide
an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and
building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering
33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis
described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued
until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and
any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension.
XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail
land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT)
stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter
with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike
racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner
elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The
location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is
a site -related contribution.
XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business
park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or
educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole
expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that
shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and
include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of
the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an
easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on
the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site -related contribution.
XIII. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I-75 and S.R. 951
Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951
to westbound (northbound) I-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011
indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of
the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes
significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site
traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above
is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level
of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the
2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an
unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will
identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and
contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to
the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as
needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution.
In
uO
LO
0
a
lid
m
W
J
as
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 46 of 51 Packet Pg. 65
3.A.d
XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are
eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and VII of this Article VI,
Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the
value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public
facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of
state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife
impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal
mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental
permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife
habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps
of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in
order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include
County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the
County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental
mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned
State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact
fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XIV.
In
uO
LO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
N
U
R
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/1 1 Page 47 of 51 Packet Pg. 66
3.A.d
w
J
J
O
Proposed
Access
RATTLESNAKE
HAMMOCK R%
EXISTING
CAT
ROUTE 0
EXISTING
CAT
ROUTE 4A
&48\
Lend
gGAT STGP/SMELTER
- Proposed CAT Roble 4A d 48 Extension
- Existing CAT Roule 4A & 48
Q Exisarp CAT Facility 4A
10 Exiling CAT Faag ty 48
- E"WV CAT Routs 7
Proposed Pedemlr n Fadlities
... Extstudp Shared Use Patti
Protect Boundafy
Development amoWary
\ EXISTING CAT
ROUTE 7
i (TO MARCO ISLAND)
DEVELOPER
/ PROP03ED CAT
/ STOP/SHELTER
THE LORD'S WAY
/ POTENTIAL
/ CAT STOP/SHELTER
/ PROPOSED
/ 4Aa4BCAT
i ROUTE EXTENSION
i DEVELOPER
/ PROPOSED
JCAT STOP/3HELTEF
i PROP. RATTLESNAKI
■ HAMMOCK RD. EXT.
oviQTwr_
CAT CAT N
FACILITY FACILITY
4A (TYP) 48 (TYP)
Land Use
.: ACracbon Tract
- Swirless Park or School
Commercial
Preserve Traat
Public Families Trad (EMS,
JuniDr Deputy
- SOiod
Residential Trad
Residential / Medial Use
Public ROW Reservation
pedestrian FedW " Wild
as Extended Along All
Internal Roads Even If Not Shown
POTENTIAL
CAT STOPISHELTER
acW ties Wul
So Mong All
Internal Roads It Not Shown
STATE
L WWS
In
to
to
IZ
lid
tv
W
J
R
W
v
R
2
T
r
W
v
c
W
c
E
O
U
Q
c
d
E
t
V
R
a+
a+
Q
i Hacienda Lakes ��Feed r . VA
Master Mobility Plan
Packet Pg. 67
3.A.d
VII PUBLIC UTILITIES
A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is
located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this
project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary. The
areas that are not part of Collier County Water -Sewer District also do not belong to any other
Water -Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project,
Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed.
B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by
the CCWSD when capacity is available.
C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a
location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available.
D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the
wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well
fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this
development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans
applications.
VIII PLANNING
A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, In
the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from r
all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the filing o
of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. a-
m
B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights
Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile W
of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) J
for the Hacienda Lakes project.
as
U
x
IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS r
The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts:
General Provisions
A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or
practice will commence earlier than 9:00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later than
11:00 P.M.
B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall U
be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, r
access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable Q
barriers.
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 49 of 51 Packet Pg. 68
3.A.d
C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security,
safety, and traffic control.
Roadways and Traffic
A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the
Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted
practices and as permitted by the County Engineer.
B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County
Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance
road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
Utilities and Service Facilities
A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now
known as the Collier County Water Sewer District).
B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other
personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic
tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the
appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies.
C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable
toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both.
Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried
holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed
commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by
the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies.
D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy
track and other non -potable uses.
X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring
until close-out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all
PUD/DRI commitments until close-out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval,
the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to
transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a
legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney.
After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval
of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As
Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County
that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new
owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing
In
uO
0
a
N
d
Y
W
J
R
C
N
U
x
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 50 of 51 packet Pg. 69
3.A.d
Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section.
When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the
monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments.
CP\10-CPS-01024\119
T"
In
LO
LO
r
d
N
d
Y
R
J
R
C
N
U
R
2
Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
BCC Approved 10/25/11 Page 51 of 51 Packet Pg. 70
sa)le-1 epu0i0eH V6U000OZOZ-ld : L9990 andW SOMe-1 epu0i0eH Lti-L L 00ueuip.ap - 3 UV :;uGwLj3ejjv
4
QC
z
Q
a
Q
C
E-
U �
w
C4O
a�
a
H
O
a
H
O
H
sa)le-1 epu0i0eH V6U000OZOZ-ld L9990 andW SOMe-1 epu0i0eH Lti-L L 00ueuip.ap - a;;y :;uGwLj3ejjv
-a N
M a
r
d
Y
V
U a
r
cn
Q
O
h
U
F�
cn
Q
O F-�
a �
a �
� Q
a w
� H �
q'3 Q Q N
z �cn
� U U
Q
OO
w
a, CIOCOO
�
Q �z xx
3
wa
QQ
U
zW
� wo
5 ce U
w
H
3.A.d
HACIENDA LAKES PUD
RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT
TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [ UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY]
MANDATED
UNITS BY GMP:
NON -MANDATED UNITS
REDUCED BY: 1.
17 IN C DISTRICT
13 IN R/MU FROM C
25 IN RMU
55 MANDATED RES UNITS
1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI -FAMILY IN
ENTIRE PUD]
CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD
2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES
UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73
RV UNITS
3. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP
TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF
DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL]
1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT
LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1.
AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON -MANDATED UNITS ARE
MULTI -FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY
DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES:
C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED)
R DISTRICT:
RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED)
CONVERSIONS:
TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT: [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS
ARE DEVELOPED]
TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM
RESIDENTIAL]
TOTAL: 1,760
3 of 5
Packet Pg. 73
3.A.d
HACIENDA LAKES PUD
COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP
TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL
IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE
140,000 BP
92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS
BP DISTRICT:
(A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND
IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS
FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION
DISAPPEARS)
OR
IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR
AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION)
OR
(B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
(EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS)
RJMU DISTRICT:
UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL -RELATED USES
[ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND
PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL]
[CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF
GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD]
[CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS
FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD]
*****************************************************
TRACT C:
327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL;
1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU
2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT
DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING
UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD]
4of5
Packet Pg. 74
3.A.d
3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE
CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND
IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000
SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND
70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL
OFFICE USES
DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF
PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU
DISTRICT
CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C:
UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF]
RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF]
RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS [MAY
HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD]
5of5
Packet Pg. 75
3.A.d
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of:
ORDINANCE 2011-41
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 25th day of October, 2011, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 28th
day of October, 2011.
DWIGHT E. BROCK
Clerk of Courts and Clerk
Ex-officio to Board of- ......
ti•
County Commission i-'V' s • �,
r.
3
r
z
By: Martha VercYa,
Deputy Clek�';�
V • V lte'.
LO
LO
0
a
N
d
Y
R
J
R
a�
x
v
a�
V
c
ca
�a
O
U
Q
C
d
E
t
V
R
a+
a+
Q
Packet Pg. 76
sOIe-1 epuOiOeH NUOOOOZOZId ms andW s04e-1 epuOiOeH VP-4 � OOueuipaO - 3 JjV :juGWLj3e;jd
_ - --- _ _ , _ _ _ __ _ I2�a/andLV 77b 2�dA0 r "gin ao
l!A!J f)kZfL'IRSt�i0� 000z-.r(dvvw �w o
�gns[A Door-.rnd eazoosroo
M VjXj S3xV7 6'Qi�I3I�VH 377 s37ddnr 1os3Yd7 eaN313eH qv 3ro
�HI 3a'asz msa*isYrsru oroz'rravw
iaroad ivsn.r :aa d.ni oas
w
w w
w w
w NMI
a
w
�M
w w
m
V)
O
V)
i
Y
Z
g
o
�
a
s a
w�oso-
W
�
o
z
s 3
w x�w s° i°��og ° �< » mz
„��� -� wo a4a ° -�� 4 a-
w �o z� o�000N�m
F�o<o
- Fop w�
j43R op8w
�1z-8. Qz sooLL �� wsw-z
ooF-o�o :!n =Qa - 5 ' m M �9w55N
° m� w°4��ri
z ffi goLL
w wC oz�o3oa 'g�o'Z. wz
a� ��w�,,= m p��o �g�woozo
Z2`Zoo�=z
<LL x w
jO�`�' �w�
m � 8,- o _O
i �zw ig NF j°Ozr
ffi
° 4 0 mz_ 0 3g-
=3=g
Q�<o�- l2„off
ff U7°7 =_owE^2. �H ��aom
�
� z
O�
z z
PE
`gi¢17
Y
3
6 \_J r4Y
2h
J
J�
I I B
61Y O I i
m° Mai--- ��
e
;Ill
I�i11
FI^ 8�IM
Ig
rc Yt_4n
a g�
x"Pui II
nru�n ea�'30ov" v
aj G
�7
Y�
f
�4
I I
Y!i
II
z
z
-
C e
II
I
11
a
m
��
Zd
O
O
~ a
z
3
;o
ado
II
4z.
GG
I I
I I
Wiw
zwp
wz
¢za
5
I I
„
II
g w
�m
.
OF wvi
I
I I
II
dma0
a
a3w
s
930
=z
U-oa
d
10/25/2011 It
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff finds the petitioner's deviation and rationale
supportable for this project.
Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding
that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the
element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the
community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation
is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of
such regulations."
FINDINGS OF FACT:
PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.13.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the
CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria"
(Staff s responses to these criteria are provided in bold font):
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Staff has reviewed the proposed rezone and believes the uses and property development
c
regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area as limited by staff.
c
If staffs limitations are accepted, the commitments made by the applicant should provide
N
adequate assurances that the proposed change should not adversely affect living conditions
a
in the area.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
r
LO
M
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be
required to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that
appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of
infrastructure will be provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the attached report from
Comprehensive Planning staff and the zoning analysis of this staff report. Based on those
staff analyses, planning zoning staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found
consistent with the overall GMP with the staff recommended limitations.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 19 of 26
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Packet Page -178- Packet Pg. 78
10/25/2011 It
Staff has provided a review of the proposed uses and believes that the project will be
compatible with the surrounding area, subject to approval of the recommended limitation
of staff, the proposed development standards and project commitments.
S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development
The amount of native preserve aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of
the LDC.
6 The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The developer has proposed that this project will be developed in one, eight -year long
phase and has provided the following breakdown (as found in the DRI DO Maps H-2-4):
ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
Stage
One
Year
Residential
Single -Family
Multi -Family
Retail
Office
Business Park
School
2912
50 Units
20 Units
30 Units
27,500 SF
0D SF
0-0 SF
2013
200 Units
100 Units
100 Units
150,000 SF
20,000 SF
0-0 SF
2014
200 Units
100 Units
100 Units
150,000 SF*
25,000 SF
40,000 SF
2015
250 Units
100 Units
150 Units
0-0 SF
25,000 SF
0.0 SF
2016
250 Units
100 Units
150 Units
0.0 SF
0L SF
I OD SF
950 Units
420 Units
530 Units
327,5DO SF
70,00D SF
1 40,000 SF
ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
Stage
Two
Year
Residential
Single -Family
Multi -Family
Retail
Office
Business Park
School
2015
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0,0 SF
0.0 SF
201,000 SF
919 Students
2D16
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20.,000 SF
2017
275 Units
100 units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20.,000 SF
2018
275 Units
100 units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2019
210 Units
84 Units
126 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
810 Units
284 Units
5215 Units
0
0
1 100,000 SF .1
919 Students
Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students
*The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be developed in Phase One, in 2014-
The DRI DO document addresses the phasing of the project as to determinations of any
substantial deviation if the phasing schedule is violated, in compliance with Florida
Statutes.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as road capacity, wastewater
disposal system, and potable water supplies (with the mitigation provided in the PUD
document and the DRI DO) to accommodate this project based upon the commitments
made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be
addressed when development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Hacienda Lakes MPLID, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Page 20 of 26
LOT_
LO
LO
r�
Packet Page -179- 1 Packet Pg. 79
10/25/2011 It
The petitioner is seeking nine deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the
purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A).
This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be
required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff has provided an analysis
of the deviation requests in the Deviation Discussion portion of this staff report, and is
recommending support of Deviations 2, 5, 7, 8 and 9; support with limitations of Deviation
3 and 4; and Denial of Deviations 1 and 6 as explained in the deviation section of this staff
report.
Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land,
the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County
Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed
change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staffs responses to these criteria are
provided in bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of
the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed project. Staff is of the
opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the c
project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this N
petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP if staffs conditions of approval J
are adopted. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME. Therefore, staff a
recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP subject to staffs
LO
conditions of approval. M
2. The existing land use pattern; W
Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and
Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis.
Staff believes the proposed rezone is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and
development restrictions included in the PUD.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;
The proposed PUD rezone) would not create an isolated zoning district because there are
lands to the west along CR 951 that are also zoned PUD (see Zoning Map).
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn given the
current property ownership boundaries. The rezoning does create one isolated pocket;
however that site is a state-owned preservation area upon which no development is
planned. The proposed uses around this pocket are shown as preserve.
S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Page 21 of 26
Packet Page -180- Packet Pg. 80
10/25/2011 It
The proposed rezone is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with
the LDC provisions to seek such the rezone to allow the owner the opportunity to develop
the land with uses other than what the existing zoning district would allow. Without
rezoning, the agriculturally zoned tracts could not be developed with the proposed uses or
with the proposed property development regulations. The applicant's request is consistent
with the proposed GMPA.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood;
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezone, with the commitments made by the
applicant, can been deemed consistent County's land use policies that are reflected by the
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The project includes numerous restrictions
and standards that are designed to address compatibility of the project. Development in
compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in
the area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes
or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project with the N
mitigation that will be provided by the developer. Staff believes the petition can be deemed a
consistent with all elements of the GMP if the mitigation is included in any
r
recommendation of approval. LO
LO
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The proposed rezone will not create drainage or surface water problems. The developer of
the project will be required to obtain a surface water management permit from the
SFWMD prior to approval of a local site development plan. The conceptual master plan
identifies the conceptual location of the water management areas which will be a
component of the water management system.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
If this rezone petition is approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with
the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. The
location of the proposed buildings, combined with the setbacks and project buffers will
help insure that light and air to adjacent areas will not be reduced.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area;
This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or
external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors
including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value
determination is driven by market conditions.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Page 22 of 26
Packet Page -181- Packet Pg. 81
10/25/2011 It
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
The proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent
properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public
policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said
Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant
of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public
welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning;
The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning
designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LDC
provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed
appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets
the intent of the PUD district, if staffs conditions of approval are adopted, and further,
believes the public interest will be maintained.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County; LO
LO
The petitioner proposes to develop a large, multi -faceted, mixed use development on 2,262f
acres. The new non-residential uses will be located nearer to the intersection of a�
Rattlesnake Hammock and CR 951, which is consistent with the current non-residential
use trend in the area, and consistent with the proposed GMPA. Residential uses will be
located west of the proposed public right of way reservation in the northern portion of the
project and along both sides of the project in the area south of the proposed Rattlesnake N
Hammock extension. Preserve areas are located on the eastern project perimeter. The
overall project density of 0.78 units per acre makes the project a low density project. The
project has been evaluated for compliance with the GMP and found to be consistent with o
the GMP requirements, as amended, if staffs conditions of approval are adopted. The c
GMP is a policy statement, which has evaluated the scale, density, and intensity of land o
uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban -designated areas of Collier County. D
Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will a
ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community if the staff
r
stipulations are adopted. Q
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; Q
and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed
Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 23 of 26
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Packet Page -182- Packet Pg. 82
10/25/2011 It
rezone is consistent with the GMP as it is proposed to be amended as discussed in other
portions of the staff report.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Most new development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site
alteration. This project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and
local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval
process and again later as part of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and
as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance,
as amended.
This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional
elements of the GMP as part of the rezone process and those staff persons have concluded
that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the
PUD document and the DRI DO.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) c
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. N
J
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. a
r
LO
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): LO
Dwight Nadeau, Planning Manager of RWA began the NIM meeting at 5:30pm. Dwight
introduced himself; David Torres, Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC; Richard
Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.; and Bob Mulhere of Mulhere &
Associates. Collier County Staff — Kay Deselem & Corby Schmidt were also present.
Dwight presented a general project overview and provided a fact sheet which included pertinent
development information related to residential yield non-residential land use intensities,
recreational and attraction land uses, and preservation areas. Dwight provided the current status
of the project with respect to future hearing dates for adoption and also explained the process of
notifying the surrounding property owners of the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM).
The following concerns were raised by the property owners and addressed by the applicant and
agent team.
Preserve Area — How will this development impact wildlife and their horses? Many residents go
horseback riding. Will the Agricultural zoning remain the same? David stated, the conservation
land would not be affected. Public Agencies are involved, i.e. the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Commission are also concerned and would ultimately be the governing party.
Affordable Housing — Is there a provision for Affordable Housing? David stated, No, a
Affordable Housing is not a component of this PUD
Hacienda Lakes MPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Page 24 of 26
July 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 7/13/11
Packet Page -183- Packet Pg. 83
3.A.f
potential digs and further study shall be provided by the Owner upon County request at no cost
to County. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with
County approval, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a
qualified archaeologist.
requirements.
D. Historical/archeological areas shall not be used to meet preserve
E. The Developer shall reasonably accommodate the Florida Division of
Historical Resource's (DHR) investigation of these sites by allowing access to the
archaeological sites by properly credentialed investigators, whenever such access can be
LO
LO
LO
reasonably accommodated.
F. If any additional archaeological/historical sites are uncovered during the
proposed development activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of such sites shall cease
immediately, and the Owner shall contact DHR, SWFRPC and Collier County so that a state
certified archaeologist can determine the significance of the findings and recommend
appropriate preservation and mitigation actions, as necessary.
3. HURRICANE EVACUATIONIFLOODPLAINS
A. (1) The following supplies and equipment shall be purchased by the
Developer for Collier County Emergency Management in accordance with its specifications
and in some cases sole source provider and delivered in new condition, free on board (FOB) to
the Collier County Emergency Services Center.
(2) The following contributions shall be a one-time contribution in full
mitigation of all requirements of the current project scope of the Hacienda Lakes DRI:
(a) Two (2) new 45kw towable portable generators with heavy
duty diesel engine, sound insulated, manufactured by Godwin Pump and Generator to exactly
Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147
BCC Approved 10/25/11
Page 9 of 56
Packet Pg. 84
3.A.f
match the supplies, equipment, and power distribution systems approved and currently in use; or
near the time of equipment acquisition by the Developer, as approved by the Collier County
Emergency Management Department. This is a sole source procurement to ensure compatibility
and parallel operations of generators within Collier County's existing fleet and insure the ability
to provide essential emergency portable power to additional evacuation shelter spaces consumed
by the increased shelter census created by the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Collier County will assume
all maintenance, repair, and replacement of these generators following satisfactory acceptance by
Collier County beyond the warranty period. Delivery of the first portable generator shall occur
prior to the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. Delivery of the second
in
in
LO
generator shall occur at the earlier of (i) 24 months from the issuance of the first residential ZI
certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 3001h residential
unit within the development.
(b) Two (2) new enclosed utility trailers for the storage and
transport of the supplies noted above. Collier County will own and maintain these trailers and
augment them with other minor disaster supplies in a fashion similar to its current disaster
response unit (DRU) shelter supply delivery system. These trailers shall be new, from a Collier
County approved list of vendor(s) and be at least 16 feet in length, dual axle load rated at 7,000
lbs. with trailer brakes, with laminate finish interior wall and floor finish, cabinets, shelving and
load secure devices, Florida Department of Transportation approved for highway use, dropdown
rear door and curbside door and extended tongue hitch length. At least one of the two trailers
noted above shall include interior AC wiring, lighting, a generator connection, circuit breaker
and roof mounted air conditioning to allow the empty trailer to be used for special post disaster
field offices, damage assessment and relief efforts identical to the County's existing fleet of
disaster supply trailers. Delivery of the utility trailers shall occur at the earlier of (i) 12 months
Hacienda Lakes, DR]-2006-AR-10147
BCC Approved 10/25/11
Page 10 of 56
Packet Pg. 85
3.A.f
from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy of the 150th residential unit within the development.
(c) Four hundred and twenty-two (422) new military type adult
folding disaster cots from a Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type
and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery
systems and shall be provided at the earlier of (i) 48 months from the issuance of the first
residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the
1200th residential unit within the development.
(d) Seventy-two (72) new special needs disaster cots from a
LO
LO
LO
Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type and style. Said cots shall be
compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems and shall be provided at
the earlier of (i) 36 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or
(ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 900th residential unit within the
development.
(e) All deeds to property located within Hacienda Lakes shall
be accompanied by a disclosure statement in the form of a covenant stating that the property is
located in a hurricane vulnerability zone, that the hurricane evacuation clearance time for Collier
County or the Southwest Florida Region is high, and/or hurricane shelter spaces are limited
B. The Developer has provided off -site hurricane shelter mitigation for the
Hacienda Lakes DRI per Paragraph A above pursuant to commitments made as a result of
negotiations with Collier County officials.
4. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
A. The Hacienda Lakes DRI shall require a South Florida Water Management
District (SWFMD) Environmental Resource Permit for conceptual approval of the proposed
Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR- 10 147
BCC Approved 10/25/11
Page 11 of 56
Packet Pg. 86
3.A.g
HEX PACKAGE
VILLA VERDE/
ALLEGRO PDI =
INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO
HACIENDA LAKES MPUD
PL202000001294
Packet Pg. 87
3.A.g
PDI
APPLICATION
FORM
In
Lo
to
Packet Pg. 88
3.A.g
Co e�r County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI)
LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90
Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code
Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is
not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD
ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the
review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based
on the findings and criteria used for the original application.
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff
DATE PROCESSED
Name of Property Owner(s):
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
Name of Applicant if different than owner: McDowell Housing Partners
Address: 601 Brickell Key Drive #700 City: Miami State: FL
Telephone:
786-257-2775
Cell: 309-303-4466
E-Mail Address: chollis@mcdhousing.com
Name of Agent: Lindsay F. Robin, MPA
Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A.
Fax: N/A
ZIP: 33131
Address: 28100 Bonita Grande DrCity: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135
Telephone: 239-405-7777
Cell: N/A
E-Mail Address: lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com
DETAIL OF REQUEST
Fax: 239-405-7899
On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request.
Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC
subsection 10.02.13 E.1.
LO
LO
LO
r
Revised 3/27/2018 Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg. 89
CO&T County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
PUD NAME: Hacienda Lakes MPUD
FOLIO NUMBER(S): 48586003020
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PROPERTY INFORMATION
ORDINANCE NUMBER: 11-41
Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be
graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a
legal description for subject portion.
Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change.
Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? ■❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year?
If yes, in whose name?
Has any portion of the PUD been ❑■ SOLD and/or ❑■ DEVELOPED?
❑ Yes
■❑ No
Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑ Yes ❑■ No
If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet.
LO
LO
LO
Revised 3/27/2018 Page 2 of 4
Packet Pg. 90
Cofier Count
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
PUD Insubstantial Change
Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code
The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at
time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW
H Ur COPIES
REQUIRED
NOT
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
1
❑
Pre -Application Meeting notes
1
✓❑
11
Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes
and why amendment is necessary
1
✓❑
❑
Detail of request
1
Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy
1
Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy
1
Revised Text and any exhibits
1
✓
�❑
PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined
✓❑
Ll
PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance #❑
✓
❑
WmTw,rt�eed TIS IS REQUIRED
❑
❑✓
❑
Legal Description
1
✓❑
Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended
❑
✓
If PUD is platted, include plat book pages
❑
❑
❑
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation
1
Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized
1
Completed Addressing Checklist
1
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
1
❑
Copy of 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site
1
✓
Electronic copy of all documents and plans
*Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials❑
to be submitted electronically in PDF format.
❑✓
❑
*If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:
Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit
all materials electronically to the designated project manager.
Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
LO
LO
Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 91
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Co er County
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
❑
School District (Residential Components): Amy
Lockheart
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director
Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey
Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David
Berra
❑
Emergency Management: Dan Summers
❑
Naples Airport Authority:
Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson
Other:
❑
City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director
El
I Other:
FEE REQUIREMENTS
P9 PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00
J Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00
P9 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00
Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the
CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX.
Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set
forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood
Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of processing this petition.
All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
Planning and Regulation
ATTN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
8/24/20
)Agent Date
Lindsay F. Robin
Applicant/Owner Name (please print)
Revised 3/27/2018
Page 4 of 4
LO
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 92
3.A.g
PRE -
APPLICATION
MEETING
NOTES
T.-
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 93
Coker County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.collier ov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400
Pre -Application Meeting Notes
Petition Type: PDI - Insubstantial Change
Date and Time: Wednesday 7/29/2020 9 : 00 AM
Assigned Planner: James Sabo
c
2
Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's):
Project Information
N
Project Name: Hacienda Lakes MPUD Senior Housing (PDI)
O
c
O
N
PL#: 20200001294
N
Property ID #: 48586003020 Current Zoning: MPUD
J
a
Project Address: City: Naples State: FL Zip; 3 4114
LO
LO
Applicant: Alexis Crespo
Waldrop Engineering c/❑ Alexis Crespo 239-85D-8525
Agent Name: Phone:
`V
c
28 00 Bonita Grande Dr, Ste 305,Bonita S rings, FL 34135
Agent/Fin state:
c
Ad ress: City: Zip:
J
a
Property owner: Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC
x
w
x
Please provide the following, if applicable:
0
i. Total Acreage:
a
ii. Proposed # of Residential Units:
iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage:
�a
iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number:
C
V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the
m
type and number:
c
0
vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#:
Q
0.
a
Updated 7/11/2019
Page I 1 of 5
Packet Pg. 94
coly County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400
Meeting Notes
As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated g
Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure
Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app M
Nate - link is https,//www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093.
ZAJ'eJA -z
N 1
roc-;z_
r aj
A)
N
ZL
l-S
JI !c IJ r+ Gi jr Grr�S,
O
O
N
Ski h� V
f A
04
ii
R `
r
u7
u7
N
rL N41r -10
O t Lk
:136 5W,1,-4V C6
A*�A At-T 1 ' L;S jy-E ,.
J
If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if
the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along
with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton
RMiddleton2naplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHolland(cDnaplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinger napfesgov.com
Erica Martin emartin na les ov.com
Disclaimer- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best
available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the
process. The Administrative Code and L.00 dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any
checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's
responsibility to provide all required data.
Updated 7/11/2019
Page 1 2 of 5
Packet Pg. 95
3.A.g
Co ieT County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (2391 252-2400
Meeting Notes
As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated a.
M
Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure
Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app J
Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093.
as
Como Planning: The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use
District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map and in the
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The FLUE N
u ��, states the purpose of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict is to provide transitional o ' OL densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural/Rural Area. The c
applicant is requesting insignificant changes to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Senior N
Housing (PDI) for development standards. Comp Planning does not have any issues with a
this petition. My apologies that a Comprehensive Planning staff member did not attend
r
this pre-app meeting. I will be reviewing application when submitted. LO
LO
.�' —►v 1�1 � v rvt �'.s. r•I�-Z — I!J � y�3 u � S rit. Cam.►,. L' �.�.►v� ll r r i�r ns Pw�. �r�+�� �t.0 w n� N
Achim 41,4 , L ALu
S 4w 3. A -
Disclaimer: information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is
based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the
applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC
dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of
required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's
responsibility to provide all required data.
Updated 7/24/2018
Page J,i(of 5
Packet Pg. 96
3.A.g
ClarkeThomas
From: SawyerMichael
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 9:06 AM
To: ClarkeThomas
Subject: RE: Notes for Hacienda Lakes MPUD Senior Housing (PDI)
Thomas,
Here you go.
Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist however also provide a note "Provide a letter of no additional
transportation impacts", no methodology meeting required.
Transportation Planning: Please provide a separate letter indicating that there are no additional units or square footage
additions proposed with this PUD change. No additional trips are proposed and no additional transportation
impacts. As discussed suggest using the interconnections between developments are part of your justification for
proposed deviation from required shuttle services. Strongly show those interconnections on your master plan.
Thanks much,
Michael Sawyer
Principal Planner
Growth Management Department
Transportation Planning
2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103
Naples, Florida 34104
239-252-2926
rr►ichael,sawyer�i_r7,ccrll iercountyfl.gov
From: ClarkeThomas Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 5:56 PM
To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: Notes for Hacienda Lakes MPUD Senior Housing (PDI)
Hi Mike,
Just a reminder to email me the notes for the Zoning Pre-App this morning for Hacienda Lakes.
Thanks
Tom
Respectfully,
7leecr" 62%6e
Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
Phone: 239-252-2526
r
LO
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 97
ove Cr County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergoy.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400
Jack McKenna, P.E.
Engineering Services
252-2911
jack,mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov
Matt McLean, P.E.
Development Review Director
252-8279
matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov
1 Michele Mosca, AICP
Capital Project Planning
252-2466
michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov
Annis Moxam
Addressing
252-5519
annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov
Richard Orth
Stormwater Planning
252-5092
richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov
Brandy Otero
Transit
252-5859
bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfl.gcv
-1 Brandi Pollard
Utility Impact fees
252-6237
brandy.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov
Todd Riggall
North Collier Fire
597-9227
triggall@northcallierfire.com
J Brett Rosenblum, P.E.
Development Review
Principal Project Manager
252-2905
brett.rosenblum@colliercoun fi. ov
James Sago, AICP
Zoning Principal Planner
252-2708
james.sabo@colliergo.net
Michael Sawyer
Transportation Planning
252-2926
michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov
L Corby Schmidt, AICP
Comprehensive Planning
252-2944
Corby.schmidt@coiliercountyfl.gov
❑ Chris Scott, AICP
Development Review - Zoning
252-2460
chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov
❑ Linda Simmons
North Collier Fire
252-2311
Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov
Peter 5hawinsky
Architectural Review
252-8523
peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov
Camden Smith
Zoning Operations Manager
252-1042
Camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov
❑ Mark Strain
Hearing Examiner/CCPC
252-4446
mark.strain@colfiercountyfl.gov
Mark Templeton
Landscape Review
252-2475
mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov
❑ Jessica Velasco
Zoning Division Operations
252-2584
jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov
Jon Walsh, P,E.
Building Review
252-2962
jonathan.walsh@colliercount fl. ov
David Weeks, AICP
Comprehensive Planning
Future Land Use Consistency
252-2306
david.weeks@coliiercountyfl.gov
Kirsten Wilkie
Environmental Review Manager
252-5518
kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov
Christine Willoughby
Development Review - Zoning
252-5748
christine.wiIloughby@colIiercountyfl.gov
Daniel Zunzune ui
North Collier Fire
252-2310
Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfLgov
Additional Attendee Contact Information:
Name
Representing
Phone
Email
r ts�l c`►2
iJ #'t. 0 Ek& .
A
a
R, avvs e'&q& j'Q±�Jl4Gdt 80 �nlG� v
I�pWa4L �CJetrs�A+{r
rL.r�v1a5�- Qv;
Gvr4C.A.t.o P
-M `f F-f8 JIGC r—
► L
a c�m �� �-�.,
STAFr=
w:2 �� a
L7 frrc]
Updated 7/11/2019
Page 1 5 of 5
mu yam{
Packet Pg. 98
3.A.g
Co er Count
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400
Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet
PL# 20200001294
Collier County Contact Information:
Name
Review Discipline
Phone
Email
CI David Anthony
Environmental Review
252-2497
david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov
Claudine Auclair
GMD Operations and
Regulatory Management
252-5887
claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov
Sally Ashkar
Assistant County Attorney
252-8842
salt .ashkar@colliercountyfl. ov
Steve Baluch
Transportation Planning
252-2361
stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov
Ray Bellows
Zoning, Planning Manager
252-2463
raymond.bellows@coiliercountyfl.gov
Laurie Beard
PUp Monitoring
252-5782
laurie.beard@colliercountyff.gov
�K Craig Brown
Environmental Specialist
252-2548
craig.brown@colIiercountyfi.gov
Alexandra Casanova
Operations Coordinator
252-2658
Alexandra .casanova @co11iercountyfI-gov
❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko
Managing Asst. County
Attorney
252-8773
heidi.ashton@coliiercountyfl.gov
L?"'—Thomas Clarke
Operations Coordinator
252-2584
thomas.clarke@colliercountyfi.gov
Jamie Cook
Prin. Environmental Specialist
252-6290
Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov
Eric Fey, P.E.
Utility Planning
252-1037
eric.fey@colliercountyfl,gov
Tim Finn, AICP
zoning Division
252-4312
timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov
Sue Faulkner
Comprehensive Planning
252-5715
sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov
Jeremy Frantz
LDC Manager
252-2305
Jeremy. Frantz@colliercountyfl. ❑v
James French
Growth Management Deputy
Department Head
252-5717
james.french@colliercountyfl.gov
.I Michael Gibbons
Structural/Residential Plan
Review
252-2426
michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov
f Storm Gewirtz, P.E.
Engineering 5tormwater
252-2434
storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov
Nancy Gundfach, AICP,
PLA
Zoning Division
252-2484
nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov
Richard Henderlong
Principal Planner
252-2464
rich ard.henderlon @ col liercountyfLgov
John Houldsworth
Engineerin_g Subdivision
252-5757
john.houldsworth@coll*iercountyfl.gov
_ Alicia Humphries
Right -Of -Way Permitting
252-2326
alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov
Erin Josephitis
Environmental Specialist, Senior
252-2915
erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov
.I Marcia Kendall
Comprehensive Planning
252-2387
marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov
I_I John Kelly
Zoning Senior Planner
252-5719
john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov
Diane Lynch
Operations Analyst
252-8243
diane.lynch@coiIiercountyfLgov
Gil Martinez
zoning Principal Planner
252-4211
gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov
Thomas Mastroberto
Greater Naples Fire
252-7348
thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov
Updated 7/11/2019
Page f 4 of 5
Ln
LO
Packet Pg. 99
3.A.g
Co ley county
Growth Management Department
Zoning Division
Applicant/Agent may also send site
plans or conceptual pions for
review in advance if desired.
PL20200001294 — Hacienda Lakes MPLID Senior Housing Insubstantial Change (PDO —
James Sabo PRE-APP
Assigned Ops Staff: Amanda Martin
Jeremy Frantz,(Ops Staff)
STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION
■ Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request
Alexis Crespo
Alexis.Cres o waldro en ineerin .com
239-850-8525
■ Agent to list for PL#
a
Waldrop Engineering c/o Alexis Crespo
uO
Ln
Ln
■ Owner of property (all owners for all parcels)
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC :4
■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.)
Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) Pre -application meeting
■ Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units offices/docks (any that
apply):
No changes to the approved MPUD density/intensity is requested. The MPUD is limited to 450 senior
housing units and the project will conform.
■ Details about Project:
Amend the Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Characteristics in PUD Document - Exhibit 8 of
Hacienda Lakes MPUD Ordinance 11-41.
PDI — Plans, Drawings etc.?
REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by:
Name: Alexis Crespo
Title: Senior Vice President - Planning
Email: alexis.crespo@waidropengineering.com
Phone: (239) 850-8525
Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Lanny Condomina-Client services Supervisor
danny.condominaou?colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-686t<q,,
Zoning ❑iism • 28M North Horseshoe Drive • Naples. i loWa 34104.239-252-2400 •www.coiinm.net Packet Pg. 100
CACT County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliereov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
This is a required farm with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the fallowing, use additional sheets if necessary.
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
101
C.
iercentage of such interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
otinterest:
I Name and Address I % of Ownership
Created 9/28/2017
Page 1 of 3
LO
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 101
Co er County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliereoy.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
f Name and Address I % of ownership
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners:
f.
9.
Name and Address � % of Ownership
Date of Contract:
If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust:
Date subject property acquired
❑ Leased: Term of lease
Name and Address
years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Created 9/28/2017
Page 2 of 3
Ln
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 102
Co er County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
Date of option:
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date:
AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Any petition required to have Property Ownership disclosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether
individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County
immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result
in the delay of processing this petition.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
ATTN: Business Center
2900 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Agent/Owner Signature
Agent/Owner Name (please print)
Created 9/28/2017
Date
Page 3 of 3
W
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 103
Coder Co 11t
y
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergow.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358
Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
PUD Insubstantial Change
Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code
The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at
time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW
# OF
C
REQUIRED
NOT
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
1
Pre -Application Meeting notes
1
❑
Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes
and why amendment is necessary
1
j®�
❑
Detail of request
1
Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy
1
Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy
1
Revised Text and any exhibits
❑
PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined
❑
PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance #
❑
—ri S ES u12 e6
❑Li
Legal Description
1
Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended
❑
Li
If PUD is platted, include plat book pages
❑
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation
1
Affidavit of Authorization signed & notarized
i
�4
Completed Addressing Checklist
1
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
1
Copy of 8 Y: in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site
1
❑
Electronic copy of all documents and plans
*Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials
to be submitted electronically in PDF format.
❑
❑
*If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:
■ Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit
all materials electronically to the designated project manager.
■ P#ease contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
3.A.g
LO
LO
Revised 3/27/2018 Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 104
3.A.g
Go er County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
❑
School District (Residential Components): Amy
Lockheart
❑
Bays hore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director
Utilities Engineering; Eric Fey
�`—i
LJ
Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams and David
Berra
Emergency Management: Dan Summers
Naples Airport Authority:
Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson
LJ
Other:
City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director
I LJ
I Other:
0
FEE REQUIREMENTS o
N
O
N
PUD Amendment insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 a
re -Application Meeting: $500.00 p4.
Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 LO
Same fee applies if the petition is referred to the Collier County Planning Commission, where the
CCPC serves as the deciding authority instead of the HEX,
MK7'A'PACCa6x .C'J-TJn, C' I❑T 1%9Q Qu l ad � -54E r�VrdLiD� S _ �t C@Sri y 00- N
r
Fire Cade Plans Review Fees are collected at the time o application submission and those fees are set N
forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood N
Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. a
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of processing this petition.
All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shafl be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
Planning and Regulation
ATTN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Agent/Owner Signature
Applicant/Owner Name (please print)
Date
Revised 3/27/2018 Page 4 of 4
Packet Pg. 105
3.A.g
COVER LETTER/
REQUEST
NARRATIVE x
Packet Pg. 106 1
IAIENGINEERING
PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC71JRE
September 15, 2020
REVISED NOVEMBER 2020
Mr. James Sabo, AICP
Principal Planner
Zoning & Land Development Review Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
3.A.g
DONI;ASPRINGS Tompo Orlando 5orosoto
23100 Bonita Grande Or., SuIIe 305, Bonin Springs, Ft 34135
p. l239j d05.7779 F, (239) A05.7"9
RE: Hacienda Lakes MPUD —Allegro at Hacienda Lakes Senior Housing
Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) - PL20200001294
Dear Mr. Sabo:
Enclosed for your review is an application for Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the
Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, a 2,262.14+/- acre project located on the east side of Collier Boulevard
(C.R. 951) and north and south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road in unincorporated Collier County,
Florida. The PDI request is specific to a 6.7+/- acre portion of a 16.29+/- acre parcel known as
"Hacienda Lakes Tract I" and designated as Residential/Medical Use (R/MU) on the Master Plan.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS:
In 2011, the overall Hacienda Lakes Property was rezoned from Rural Agriculture (A) and Agricultural
Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development pursuant to Ordinance 11-
41. The MPUD allows for a maximum of 1,760 dwelling units, 327,500 square feet of commercial retail
uses, 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 135 hotel rooms, 140,000 square feet
of business park/educational facilities, a public school, and continuation of the "swamp" buggy
attraction.
In 2014, the MPUD was amended pursuant to HEX No. 2014-18 to add a deviation to allow one wall
sign with a maximum height of 13 feet at the entrance to Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes. Subsequently,
in 2015 pursuant to HEX No. 2015-06, the MPUD was amended specific to Esplanade at Hacienda
Lakes to reduce the front yard setback for secondary front yards on residential corner lots from 20 feet
to 10 feet.
The MPUD was amended again in 2016 pursuant to HEX No. 2016-20 to reduce the front yard setback
from secondary front yards on single family detached, zero lot line and two family/duplex corner lots; to
increase the minimum distance between multi -family principal structures; and to add four (4) deviations
relating to entrance signs, dead-end streets, and off-street parking, only for the residential development
known as Azure at Hacienda Lakes.
The proposed senior housing project known as Allegro at Hacienda Lakes is located within Hacienda
Lakes Tract I, ("property"), which is located in the southwestern portion of the MPUD, directly south of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road, less than 1/2 a mile east of the Rattlesnake Hammock and CR 951
intersection, and directly north and west of the Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes residential community.
The property is designated within Tract R/MU, on the MPUD Master Plan and DRI Map H, which allows
for residential and commercial uses including senior housing units. The site is currently undeveloped
with the exception of an existing stormwater management lake.
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294
Cover Letter/Requ
Packet Pg. 107
3.A.g
REQUEST
The Applicant, McDowell Housing Partners, develops affordable housing projects nationwide including
highly demanded affordable senior. The development program, known as Allegro at Hacienda Lakes,
proposed on the 6.7+/- acre site includes 160 affordable housing units restricted to senior citizens
ages 62 and older. The requested modified development standards specific to the Operational
Characteristics for Senior Housing will allow for the protection of public health, safety and welfare, while
supporting the Applicant's proposed affordable senior housing project. The request is in compliance
with Exhibit A — Permitted Uses, which requires no less than 25 units to be constructed within Tract
R/MU and allows for the senior housing use. The MPUD contains a total of 38.82+/- acres of
residential/medical use (R/MU) areas of which the only remaining lands left in the R/MU is the
16.29-acre subject parcel, of which the Applicant is utilizing 9.81+/- for the senior housing project
including a 3.1+/- acre pond area outside of the project boundary. A total of 6.5+/- acres will remain in
the tract for future development.
The Applicant is committing to providing 140 rental units within the "low income" bracket, or 51 % - 80%
annual medium income (AMI), and 20 rental units within the "extremely low income" bracket, or 30% or
less AMI, for a total of 160 affordable rental units. The units will be Independent Living Facility units,
which are intended to support independent living and not those that would require the level of care
provided at a convalescent or a skilled nursing facility.
The Applicant, or its management company, will provide resident programs including assistance with
light housekeeping, grocery shopping and/or laundry services. A list of qualified service providers will
be provided and updated every six (6) months to ensure the referral information is accurate and up to
date. The Applicant or management company will also coordinate, at no cost to the resident, the
scheduling of these services.
In order to maintain affordability of the rental units, the Applicant is requesting Staff's approval of an
insubstantial change to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI to allow for the following modifications to the
PUD related to senior housing units:
1) Amend Exhibit "B" Development Standards, Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing, to
support the development of an affordable senior housing development program on Tract I located
within Tract R/MU by eliminating requirements for on -site dining facilities, transportation services, and
emergency response devices in the units ; and
2) Amend Exhibit "C" Master Plan, to incorporate Exhibit C-1, R/MU Access to Rattlesnake Hammock
Road.
The following is more detailed discussion on the appropriateness of the request based upon the unique
nature of the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project and the County's stated affordable housing goals.
1. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing
The Applicant is requesting approval to remove several operational characteristics for senior housing in
order to develop a bona fide affordable senior housing project in an area of the county where a senior
housing development is approved and highly demanded. Affordable senior housing is especially
needed for seniors who are retired and on fixed incomes. While their income remains fixed, the cost of
housing continues to rise, especially in Southwest Florida. For many, entering retirement means
tightening budgets in order to make their pension or savings last, making the need for an affordable
housing option critical. As a demonstration of the need for this type of housing in Collier County, the
LO
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 108
3.A.g
Applicant has obtained approval for expedited review through the Certificate of Affordable Housing
Expedited Review process provided by the Public Services Department.
Specifically, the Applicant is requesting removal of the following operational characteristics for senior
housing contained in Exhibit B of the PUD document:
.,Remove: "There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service
being on -site, or catered."
In order to maintain the affordability factor for the senior housing development, the project will not
contain on -site dining facilities. Allegro at Hacienda Lakes is an Independent Living Facility intended to
provide senior housing for independent adults with the ability to operate a vehicle, take public
transportation, or walk/bike to and from their destinations including for meals.
As outlined in more detail below, the Applicant, or its managing entity, will provide assistance with
grocery shopping through on -site management. Allegro at Hacienda Lakes is located on Rattlesnake
Hammock Road, which is immediately southeast of the Hammock Park MPUD. Upon final approval, the
Hammock Park MPUD will provide for dining options that are within 1/4 mile of the project, further
providing the residents with access to dining.
• Remove: "Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the
purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services
shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office
visits."
To maintain the affordability of the project, group transportation services are not proposed. The project
is served by Collier County Area Transit, which provides multiple routes and transit opportunities to the
property. Routes 17 and 18 are the nearest to the property and are both located on CR 951 just south
of Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
Residents are also typically able to operate a vehicle, and will have access to groceries, medical
facilities, services, and other types of shopping in the immediate area. As previously mentioned, directly
northwest of the Property is the Hammock Park MPUD, which upon final approval will provide a mix of
residential and commercial uses including a minimum of 20,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses of which a
minimum of 5,000 sq. ft. must be dedicated to restaurants. Residents will be able to walk or bike
0.35+/- miles to this development via the sidewalks in place along Rattlesnake Hammock Road both on
the north and south side. Directly across CR 951 at the northwest corner is a Publix shopping center,
which is 0.50+/- miles from the senior housing project and also provides groceries within close
proximity at a walkable, bikeable, and drivable distance.
• Remove: "Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service
providers in the event of a medical or other emergency."
By removing this requirement the Applicant is able to maintain a price point that provides for an
affordable senior housing project. The Applicant is proposing an Independent Living Facility use, which
reduces the need for these services that are typically found in Assisted Living Facilities, or Skilled
Nursing facilities. Residents in an ILF are highly functional and will not require this advanced level of in -
room emergency devices. The Applicant can provide cost-effective safety measures that will uphold the
intent of this condition, but without the associated cost. Furthermore, in -room devices are known to
malfunction causing false alarms and long-term maintenance issues. Safety is a priority to the Applicant
LO
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 109
3.A.g
and they have demonstrated at other affordable senior housing projects through unit design and on -site
management/oversight.
Those operational characteristics in the adopted PUD that are not proposed for modification -include
NO Change: "The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older."
The Allegro at Hacienda Lakes project is a senior housing development and will be age -restricted to
comply with this characteristic, and exceeds the minimum requirement by restricting to 62 years and
older.
NO Change: "There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents,
who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the
residents. "
In direct compliance with this characteristic, the Applicant or its management company, will provide on -
site, supervised, structured activities, at no cost to the residents, at least five (5) days a week. The
activities will be offered between the hours of 8:OOa.m. and 7:OOp.m.
The Applicant or the management company will also make available, at no cost to the residents,
literacy tutor(s) who will provide weekly literacy lessons to residents in private space on -site. Various
literacy programing can be offered that strengthens participants' reading, writing skills, and
comprehension, but at a minimum will provide basic reading education and English proficiency. The
adult literacy component will also be offered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
• NO Change: "An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness
opportunities for the residents."
In addition to the daily activities that will be provided as mentioned in the previous point, the project will
also provide a fitness center with age -appropriate equipment and ongoing fitness opportunities for
residents.
NO Change: "Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age
in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to
accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding
grab bars."
The Applicant is committed to providing a senior housing development that caters to the concept of
aging in place. The units will be designed in such a manner.
2. Modified Access
As depicted on Exhibit C-1, R/MU Access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and outlined in the enclosed
Traffic Memorandum prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A., the Applicant is proposing to
add an access point from the R/MU Tract to Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The proposed access
point complies with the criteria outlined in the Collier County Access Management Criteria (Resolution
2013-57). The proposed ingress/egress will provide direct access to the Allegro at Hacienda Lakes
senior housing project on Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
LO
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 110
3.A.g
The additional access point is to provide the senior housing project with direct access to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road. As shown on Exhibit C-1, the interconnection to Tract C to the west will remain, so the
additional access will not remove any opportunities for interconnectivity between the parcels. The
project's proposed driveway location is in compliance with Collier County Access Management Policy
and is appropriate for this location. The proposed SDP application and associated TIS will provide
additional support and definition for the access to this project. In addition, potential internal connections
within the Hacienda Lakes PUD will be maintained which will help reduce traffic on the external
roadways.
The Applicant is also amending the Mobility Master Plan within the PUD document to reflect the
existing conditions. Allegro at Hacienda Lakes is providing a hammerhead that meets the fire apparatus
turnaround, and Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes dead -ends at that location and also meets the LDC
requirement for dead -ends (not to exceed 150'). This road is already constructed and there is no intent
to provide an interconnection between what will be two (2) private communities.
JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13.E:
The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC
§10.02.13.E as follows:
a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD;
No, the request will not change the existing PUD boundary.
b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or
height of buildings within the development;
No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of
proposed buildings. The Applicant is not proposing any changes to the
development standards table.
c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas
within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or 5 acres in area;
No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation,
or open space areas.
d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include
institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation
or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses;
No, the request does not impact the size of non-residential areas, or propose to
relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. The R/MU tract is permitted for a
mix of commercial and residential land uses, including senior housing.
e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not
limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on
other public facilities;
LO
LO
LO
r
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 111
3.A.g
No, the request will not result in an impact to the development in terms of traffic
and public facilities. Please refer to Exhibit C-1 enclosed, which demonstrates the
vehicular access points that will serve the project and also provides an
interconnection to the west as intended by the PUD Master Plan. The Applicant
has also provided a detailed traffic memorandum that outlines how the request
does not increase traffic generation or changes in traffic circulation, or impacts on
public facilities, and how the proposed access will comply with the Collier County
Access Management Policy.
A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular
traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers;
No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in
land use activities is being requested. The senior housing residential use is
approved on the R/MU tract.
g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will
otherwise increase stormwater discharges;
No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention
or increase stormwater discharges. LO
r
h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be
incompatible with an adjacent land use;
No, the request will not negatively impact abutting land uses. The project will
continue to provide the required buffers and preserve as outlined in the approved
zoning ordinance. From an internal compatibility standpoint, the senior housing
project abuts existing residential land uses within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD to
the south, a roadway to the north and east, and vacant future development to the
west.
As demonstrated on the proposed Exhibit C-1, R/MU Access to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road, the senior housing development project will continue to provide
an interconnection to the remaining R/MU lands located directly to the west. While
the actual Allegro at Hacienda Lakes affordable senior housing project may be
gated, it remains essential to provide the additional interconnect as intended and
shown on the PUD Master Plan for interconnectivity purposes.
Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD
ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of
the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or
intensity of the permitted land uses;
No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth
Management Plan. The request is limited to modifying operational characteristics
for senior housing in order to provide a bona fide affordable senior housing
project in eastern Collier County where the senior housing use is approved.
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 112
3.A.g
The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional
impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a
determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any
change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD
master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and
approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or
Yes, the PUD is within a DRI. The requested amendments do not substantiate a
change to the DRI or PUD master plan based on the criteria outlined in the F.S.
k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD
ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as
described under this LDC section 10.02.13
No, the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD and may be
processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code.
CONCLUSION:
In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow for an affordable senior housing project in a
Collier County. The MPUD and the requested amendments will remain consistent with the LDC and the
Growth Management Plan (GMP); the changes meet all criteria for review as an Insubstantial Change; LO
and the request will not impact internal or external compatibility of the project.
The following items are enclosed for your review:
1. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request;
2. One (1) copy of the completed PDI Application;
3. One (1) copy of the Pre -Application Meeting Notes;
4. One (1) copy of the Current Master Plan;
5. One (1) copy of the Exhibit C-1, R/MU Access to Rattlesnake Hammock Road;
6. One (1) copy of the PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined;
7. One (1) copy of the Traffic Memorandum;
8. One (1) copy of the Recorded Plat;
9. One (1) copy of the Affidavit of Authorization;
10. One (1) copy of the Evidence of Authority;
11. One (1) copy of the approved Addressing Checklist;
12. One (1) copy of the Property Ownership Disclosure Form; and
13. One (1) copy of the Location Map.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 908-3079,
or lindsay.robin(a)-waldropengineering.com.
Sincerely,
WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A.
YP�0 M.
Lindsay F. Robin, N
Project Manager
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 113
3.A.g
Enclosures
cc
Ana Padilla & Christopher Shear, McDowell Housing Partners
David Torres, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC
Norm Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., Trebilcock Consulting Solutions
LO
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - PDI PL20200001294 Q
Cover Letter/Request Narrative
Packet Pg. 114
3.A.g
EXHIBIT C
CURRENT PUD
MASTER PLAN U)
-
Packet Pg. 115 1
Q
M
6uisnOH joivas andW MILM epuaioeH V6U000OZOZId :
M90 (V6ZVOZOZId) X3H oJ6aIItl apJan eIIIA - do )Ioe8 3ueoiiddtl - d utl :3uewyoeutl
-Btz 164.,....E ............. ......- -. --.._ . '.'-__......
Ot5 L6516OZ1 XtlJ SL56L66(6OZ1 6O(-PI-W'-1*N'OOZ611n5'-OWed x�%IIM Ol68
9-ih
Id(/(AdP
A V'7d '1 3 ! 3VIAT
VY lU a LJ YY4
NH'Q
U- 3NJ
91 3O Z
wa
r
lV S T TA 1 \ T
d LIAT rJI�iI L'IfAIA
19G1Gf)dI1V776'93AO
5
W
�Eazoo ,
a
W468= X
V1Y1�1
Sax'V7
YGN3I3h'H
J77 s37ddn1Jo SJVV7 eaNJ»eH
oOZ_.1i n7a
EOZ0031
ro
z
JHI
d�3roaa
1Neln
3�z'3x srosa2�zsm�u
3oa dm.� o3s
'HD I
oroz'e�a
3�
�
d
-
3
wz
z�
ppW. Ng�a
�o
ti
2- 5
2�2HE
:8.1
= tea`-'Nosog
z z
a
aarrc
i �tio
�
o:�
iioo
�Wa<w�
m
�
o<
�w000'o i5waa
mw
N
-o
-moo
uo 0
ogNW
z
-
-�z
nJw�cHo a�w
aJ6'WySx
m ��
wz
m
zz Z'�"-o
c -z
iLLa
w"z
�gwJ�<zzo
0 0
0
-
u,
o GGG
N
pis so?N�
-
-
o
a�=
Li
0.20.0
888
'a oa�g
Ewa
�Cw
moo
oz
rc rn �.rr
U _.z
_wc�
xv�o
?oW���no m�
8 N
x-H
«
Q M
Y
M
-
}
K
(mN
N
J
JJ
Q
V)
N
= F
w
N
p S
�
O
�
w \
g
o
a
a
a
4
w U
O
w U
O
Q
-7,
K
wO
2
U
O
z
�
�
y
O
3
e8A.
o
$
p
_
53333
%
w
z$
®
- MR
io
mU 1 1 .... a y 0 v, x a1,4
o�
was
(anwn) i�lwsio ssn wxin 3oxiw mnx 3 �
_. '-(eenfiaSliu iwx3ols3d%ri _._�Y:
III'69
@@@ 'a
;m -B_-
___
Ilp x
I I I I
u
I
C5
z6
3�
z�^
�z
w°
yo
az
gY3
�gs
W,
;B
g8
I
I
3.A.g
PROPOSED
EXHIBIT C-1
T.-
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 117 1
3.A.g
LEGEND
H INGRESS/EGRESS
LAKE
® PROJECT AREA = 6.71± ACRES
TRACT "C" = COMMERCIAL
TRACT "R/MU" = RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE
TRACT "R" = RESIDENTIAL
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD
TRACT
"R/M U"
TRACT j
IICII
P
COLLIER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER
HACIENDA LAKES MPUD
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
0 \ T-
1
I N
0
/ J
LLo
IV ALE /
WAY
TRACT
IIRII
PALACIO
TERRACE
PALACI O NORTH
ERRACE - - - - - - --
WESTI lFt F/-\ /,\ /-\ /,\ /,\ /,\ /,\ /,\ /,\ /^� /\ /\\ /\\ /
EXHIBIT C-1: R/MU ACCESS TO
RATTLESNAKE THAMMOCK ROAD IIAIENGINEERIN
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIER COUNTY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANOSCAPEARCHITEC
23 50 26 FLORIDA
28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305
RONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
REVISION DATE: 11/11/2020 P: 239-405-7777 F: 239405-7899
SHEET: 1 OF 1 EMAIL: info@waldrapengineering.com
Packet Pg. 118 1
3.A.g
PUD DOCUMENT
IN STRIKE-
Lo
Lo
Lo
THROUGH/ x
UNDERLINE
FORMAT
Packet Pg. 119 1
3.A.g
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
0
L
0
Operational Characteristics for Senior Housinj N
0
x D
• The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older;
Thefe shall be en site dining f4eilifies to the fesidews, with feed sen4ee being on site, of ;
of shopping. individual tr-anspei4afion seiwiees shall be eoor-dinated for- the fesidents needs, ineluding
t limited to medieal ffiee visits;
• There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for
planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents;
• An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents.
• Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens
may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms
may be retrofitted by adding grab bars.
• Lands described in SDP PLPL20200001717 shall comply with the following: One Hundred Percent (100%) oof
the 160 units will be restricted to households with less than 80% Annual Median Income (AMI), of which no
less than 16 units will be restricted to households with less than 30% Annual Median Income (AMI). This
restriction shall remain in place for no less than thirty (30) years from the date issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy).
LO
LO
LO
Hacienda Lakes MPUD Words st -uek thfough are deleted;
Last Revised: January 29, 2021 Words underlined are added
Packet Pg. 120
3.A.g
TRAFFIC STUDY
MEMORANDUM
r
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 121 1
3.A.g
TPBDIICOCN
planning -engineering
Traffic Study Memorandum
The Harmony (fka Villa Verde)
Prepared for:
Waldrop Engineering
28100 Bonita Grande Drive
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
Phone: 239.405.7777
Collier County, Florida
9/15/2020
Prepared by:
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34104
Phone: 239.566.9551
Email: ntrebilcock@trebiIcock.biz
LO
LO
LO
r
Packet Pg. 122
3.A.g
The Harmony (fka Villa Verde) — Traffic Study Memorandum — September 2020
Statement of Certification
I certify that this Traffic Study Memorandum has been prepared by me or under my immediate
supervision, and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation
Engineering.
This item has been electronically signed and sealed
by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida
license 47116, using a SHA-1 authentication code.
Printed copies of this document are not considered
signed and sealed, and the SHA-1 authentication
code must be verified on any electronic copies.
Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., PTOE
FL Registration No. 47116
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34104
Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796
LO
LO
LO
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
Page 12
Packet Pg. 123
3.A.g
The Harmony (fka Villa Verde) — Traffic Study Memorandum — September 2020
General Considerations - Study Criteria
The purpose of this submittal is to review access management procedures and provide guidance
for a proposed access onto Rattlesnake Hammock Road east of Collier Boulevard. The access is
being considered for a proposed development, The Harmony (fka Villa Verde), which is within
the Hacienda Lakes PUD and lies south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, east of the FPL utility
easement and west of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Viale Way.
An Insubstantial Change to the Hacienda Lakes PUD (PDI) is being prepared to include the
proposed additional access to the Hacienda Lakes Master Plan and this memorandum is provided
to support the PDI application.
The Harmony project is an Assisted Living Facility which will provide 229 beds in 160 dwelling c
0
units. The ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 254, Assisted Living Facility was used to calculate the projects o
N
AM and PM peak hour trip generation. Based on the independent variable "beds", the estimated N
J
trip generation is: AM — Entering-28vph, Exiting-16vph and PM — Entering-23vph, Exiting-37vph. a
LO
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Resolution 2013-256 authorized a speed LO
limit of 40 mph for Rattlesnake Hammock Road from Collier Boulevard east to the future Benfield
le
Road Extension. N
The access management classification was adopted for this roadway by Collier County Resolution
2013-257 and established Rattlesnake Hammock Road east of Collier Boulevard as a Class 5
roadway. Consistent with the Collier County Access Management Policy, a Class 5 roadway is a
divided arterial with a minimum connection spacing of 220 feet, minimum directional median
opening spacing of 440 feet, minimum full median opening spacing of 660 feet and a minimum
signal spacing of 0.25 miles.
Project access is typically evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Right-of-
way Manual: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; and (b)
multi -lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided: and (c) when new
median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes.
Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning
vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two -minute period
for left -turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet
and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet.
Based on FDOT Standard Plans Index 711-001, for a design speed of 40 mph — urban conditions
—the minimum turn -lane length is 185 feet (which includes 50 feet of taper) plus required queue.
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 3
Packet Pg. 124
3.A.g
The Harmony fta Villa Verde) — Traffic Study Memorandum — September 2020
Rattlesnake Hammock Road - Proposed Project Access
The proposed access onto Rattlesnake Hammock Road will be a right-in/right-out connection. A
dedicated eastbound right -turn lane is warranted as the multi -lane criteria is met. In
conformance with FDOT Standard Plans Index 711-001, the proposed eastbound right -turn lane
will be a minimum 210 feet long (which includes a 1 vehicle queue).
Based on existing and future driveway locations, the projects driveway will be approximately 289
feet from the driveway to the west and approximately 441 feet from the driveway to the east.
As such, the project's proposed driveway location is in compliance with Collier County Access
Management Policy and is appropriate for this location. For additional details see Figure 1.
A future SDP application and TIS will provide additional support and definition for the access to
this project. In addition, potential internal connections within the Hacienda Lakes PUD will be
maintained which will help reduce traffic on the external roadways.
LO
LO
LO
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14
Packet Pg. 125
176M000ZOZId : M90 (NU-OZOZId) X3H oJ6811y OPJOA e11!n - do Moe8 ;ueoilddy - I jjv :juewLj3ejjb co
I IIC nU//IIUIIy UKU VIIIU VCIUCI - 1f UJJIC .)LUUY IVIUfflUf UfIUUffi -Jt FpLtfflUeI LULU N
i�
a
Y
Figure 1
a
sallndaa ar iYytu
andW - S934VI VCIN910VH
=
I
g
U
U
o
U
2
a
I g
�
a
z
W
J
I
�
U
f
F
I
—�_ =—d� -
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
Page 15
3.A.g
PLAT
HACIENDA
LAKES TRACT I x
Packet Pg. 127 1
I
I
F
d
w
to
N
W
z
a
E.
o
€a-
Ul
z �
Z F q
W
a a
2 s S
N
CQ
O �w
co7�
W C,jz
r w
A
p
V U
h 7
ra � a
w
q �o
y �U
Wo
L W
xm
k,
0
E-E
a
r�
0
z
0
w
6 335 Yn
HJ.L__________________
_
_____
,L, —
—
r__ a
yak,
1
SB88t
w
1 "
Ma,,GeaoS
1 / crop .�r.faa� 3.00.�:msE,
1 �
a
s I<�
a
am
�ffi^ x
a
s
aw
w
wF
m
w�
�5:
6
T�-�az as
I �nam
=�
I
sj
I1 s6
,- -
"x,ao
Sa�S,,,o.,�
II
� al 11 y
II�Il1o�"
`wwoN, 1
� li
_ iil �
OI S38ELS ,Has
.HM7 HJ,LVIY
I
Ld
Y O
O
z� oam a
�0��
m
W
gLd
-
a
�V)
E-
Cn
W
cc
0
z
a
Ex-E
O
0
ax
az
F�
C12a
O �w
CE
�z
w
U
�--1 c a
zz
wo
UU
w
0
a
d'
a
w
0
z
0
a
� w
U]
o
219
d z �
«8
„B
4
0 0 N2
gas
B SHHHS Has HM HaLvH
— RIB �— —
I[ .LHHHs ass V aNn HJlV34
— — — — — — — —
a
_22� I1Ii II
�30 '
rese xs�
LL
nou 111�a k! l
m
s:
a
Wece
you
w s-a
�
oxpu
vWx
=s�
�n8
IN
a�
N w
�x
y
oy
JJ 1
n000$�=
s'
I
r—
a
�04 1 S oe
r— —r
1111
�` G-TaJ
�
a�
� I -
✓y o s
o zooa�
�oo�t
I I c
00JJ
V1 3�'"
a'g L_
m oa
LLJ
Vs$}$
-
as0 m e
n _
ZI ISMS LqNS H 3M7 HJdVH _ _ _ _ _ _
w
�1
CQ
wl
w
�1
�
m
�
—
1
0
1
o a
ko
ry)
a
wI
Z o 6
E,Q
� 1
zl
sac
a s
W NO
FI
O
wl
a 1
<sK
� 1
sal
�1
's
---
OI .638HS .7; V 3NlI HU.LV11'
J � T6 ry
3.A.g
AFFIDAVITS OF
AUTHORIZATION
r
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 131 1
3.A.g
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20200001294
1 David Torres (print name), as Managing Member (title, if
applicable) of Hacienda Lakes of Naplos. LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0applicant =contract purchaser=and that:
1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the approved action.
5. Well authorize Waldrop Engineering, P•A to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
'`Notes:
• If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres.
• If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should
typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member."
• If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership.
• If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general
partner" of the named partnership.
• If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee".
• In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare thaI h e read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts in it
stated are trur/-
`A �
Sig
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
Date
The Foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical resen or ❑online notarization this
day of S� 2029 by (printed name of owner or qua
li ier) WOW torr,<S
R
ch person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box:
Are personally known to me
® Has produced a current drivers license
® Has produced as identification.
Notary Signatu
CP\08-COA-00115\155
REV 3/4/2020
JESSICA K LINN
Staterf&lorida•Motary Public
Commission H GG 170813
%" Q�'�= My Commission Expires
�'''+i ii o�,.
April 16, 2022
Packet Pg. 132
3.A.g
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBER ►(S)PL20200001294
I, Christopher Shear (print name), as Authorize Representative (title, if
applicable) of GORE MMP Col ier Ltd (company, If ap licable), swear or affirm
wner
under oath, that I am the (choose one) o=appllcant�contract purchaserMand that;
1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the approved action.
5. Well authorize Waldrop Engineering, P.A, _ to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above,
`Notes:
• If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp. pres. or v, pres.
• If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C,) or Limited Company (L,C.), then the documents should
typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member."
• if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership.
• if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general
partner" of the named partnership.
• If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"
o In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership,
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I
the facts state ' it are true.
Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
— o
ate
The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or ❑ online notarization this
day of , 201,1 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Christopher Shear
7s person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box:
Are personally known to me
❑ Has produced a current drivers license
❑ Has produced I s identification.
Notary Signature: SQ
M08-Can-001 151155
REV 31-112020
v'►°`'' [IfERYt CHALAS
Notary Publlc • SWt0 or Florida
24
COMM Ission 8 Wtt 040453
,.or, My COMM.. Expires Oct 23, 324
Bonded through National Notary Assn.
LO
L0
Packet Pg. 133
2020 FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP REINSTATEMENT
DOCUMENT# Al9000000569
Entity Name: CORE MHP COLLIER, LTD.
Current Principal Place of Business:
601 BRICKELL KEY DRIVE
SUITE:700
MIAMI, FL 33131
Current Mailing Address:
601 BRICKELL KEY DRIVE
SUITE:700
MIAMI, FL 33131 US
FEI Number: APPLIED FOR
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
CORPORATE CREATIONS NETWORK INC.
801 US HIGHWAY 1
NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408 US
FILED
Oct 08, 2020
Secretary of State
7243285579CR
Certificate of Status Desired: No
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE: CARLOS M ALVAREZ, SPECIAL SECRETARY 10/08/2020
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date
General Partner Detail
Document #
Name CORE COLLIER GP, LLC
Address 9421 HAVEN RANCHO
City -State -Zip: CUCAMONGA CA 91730
I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under
oath; that I am a general partner of the limited partnership or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 620, Florida Statutes, and that my name
appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered.
SIGNATURE: CARLOS M ALVAREZ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT 10/08/2020
Electronic Signature of Signing General Partner Detail Date
3.A.g
.y
3
O
2
L
O
d
U)
0
a
y
d
Y
l3
J
�a
O
2
rn
N
T"
O
O
O
0
N
O
N
J
a
u7
u7
u7
Packet Pg. 134
3.A.g
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20200001294
I, Christopher Shear (print name), as Chief Operating Officer (title, if
applicable) of McDowel_I_Housing Partners (company, If applicable), swear or affirm
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner=applicant r7vcontract purchaser=and that:
1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the approved action.
5. Well authorize Waldrop Engineering, P.A. to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
"Notes: N
0
• If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v. pres. C4
• If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should a
typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member."
• If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. LO
LO
• If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general
partner" of the named partnership.
• If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"
cm
• In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership. N
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts stated in.i re true.
I//.;/ZoZe)
Signature Date
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of IM/Physical presence or 0 online notarization this
day of KCWA?nbetr , 2420� by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Christopher Shear
Suc person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box:
Are personally known to me .�Ar'ru . CHERYL CHAL45
� F Notary Public - State of Florida
0 Has produced a current drivers license �Q Commission N HH 040a53
,%�oFfl My Comm. Expires Oct 23, 2024
0 Has produced as identification. Sanded through National Notary Assn,
Notary Signature:
•., CHERYL CHALAS
Notary Public - State of Florida
' commission p HH 040453
� 1 My Comm. Expires Oct 23, 2024
CPW-COA-ut111511 S5 9ooded through National Notary Assn.
lZw 31ar2020
Packet Pg. 135
OF
The unWeaApned ceni ic. €Teat tic i OV WAY _al-rpOirMOJ atict aaMy StUN aq t=t \Ir:lNMrll
1lcoia in ttrt a;e�� . 1.1 (' and dwi its "tw1l. he is alatltOrod v excc°tatc and r. ehm,
the t'T31t1c21tt: ou t hzoi 111,: f1n&dsq-nied kirlh r ixrtill4S dint,
I . Allali fwd ltet'c t�-, :t' LAW?i 4 fit O, respevA cly arc trot inci ���craa�i�t�° s',pj °N trt
alle t..erll ic:iw of 1°E,a•lltali n tax ;rnts'r1c1c:I, and ttat° any w€wlte! l t,rlst;,,d l.i:ri,ilit�
Unalimt) Op radrap Aprcerrem of the Ctsmhaf ; an in vlfect o" to Ina ',o"41 mat1 ,tail
Ciiniticear#c of 1-ortrawion zjnAmcildcd) Re',twed i imitk:kj 1 r andil� � .sm, an. t��,�rztirl
Agrc:vmem havc not hi.en paltered. amended. mioditie , or r'1w�unic d
2. VI IC f6IIoki n g pkr'tmis xv lit'1a appoilliiit and kit a.alltic�<1 wtI'xrs iat the ()liI pani -
hkol roan the indiu. ed, and tlx: NQ9tmttww amvwilg 4opj.N1St'e their ratarlrc4 hdoJre their
trope atld pomme ,:grt.rtltre4_
'\garm ' A
1 !'s.ttr'ic WI,:)aw ll %laa3liunt?1 Iunner and t %vt_°lawl
ani1 fa I _cc Maamaging partner, Uo-("hlki f
t Ian, htlAwr %bear t. h"I't °rwol" [rltic °s
%kno sii ad (Sir WamnO t.aatd
1> ist.arlr Sc4,:rLaarx
psjo\.t 1-1,'1q_ l .ti.aE� ! OI l.trt\ '�!
Re,17mil "
LO
Packet Pg. 136
3.A.g
Delaware Page
The First State
I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT
COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF "MCDOWELL ACQUISITIONS,
LLC", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER, A.D.
2015, AT 5:12 O'CLOCK P.M.
5866546 8100
SR420150742062
JanraV W. dullos�_ $irrtla7 U SLaif
Authentication: 10360679
Date:11-04-15
You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml
Packet Pg. 137
3.A.g
Delaware Page 1
The First State
1, JEFFREY W . BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "MCDOWELL ACQUISITIONS, LLC" IS DULY
FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD
STANDING AND HAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE SHOW, AS OF THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, A.D. 2015.
5866546 8300
SR# 20150742062
xw
You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml
wz-g(� .
Mmyw. ewioc■ S.z^'-ry m yia1a
Authentication: 10360680
Date: 11-04-15
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 138
3.A.g
State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 05:12 PBf 11/02/2015
FILED 05:12 Pnf 111022015 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
SR 20150741062 - File Number 5866546
m
McDOWELL ACQUISITIONS, LLC
This Certificate of Formation of McDowell Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company") dated as of
November 2, 2015, is being duly executed and filed by Charles W. Koslosky, an individual, as an
authorized person to form a limited liability company under the Delaware Limited Liability
Company Act (b Del-C. § 18-101, et seq.).
FIRST: The name of the limited liability company formed hereby is McDowell
Acquisitions, LLC.
SECOND: The address of the registered office of the Company in the. State of Delaware. is
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of
Delaware 19801.
LO
THIRD: The name and address of the registered agent for service of process on the
Company in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center,
1209 Orange Street, City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware 19801. N
a�
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation. this
2°d day of November, 2015.
W
Charles W. Koslos y,
Authorized Person
Packet Pg. 139
3.A.g
DISCLOSURE OF
INTEREST
T.-
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 140
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.coiliergov.net
Coder County
3.A.g
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary.
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
C.
ercentage oT sucn interest:
Name and Address % of Ownershin
If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
iercentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
iercentage of interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Created 9/28/2017
Page 1 of 3
LO
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 141
3.A.g
Coder County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.collierrgro_v.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC
7742 Alico Road
Fort Myers, FL 33912
o'.4 ftt't't U -I.
T tI 0&-
(�z� ►� , t� r L, 1� �o., r err "r ` �/ -h-e
e. If there is a CON ACT FOR PURCHASE, w'il h an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
cr
f
9.
� IILCf '�, �.LULKI IVIUCf S, uefiel iLiar les, Ur partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Date of Contract:
If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
I
I ILCI J, rl a LUf pup CILIVII, Pdr Lner5nlp, OF tru5t:
Name and Address
Date subject property acquired
❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Created 9/28/2017
Page 2 of 3
Packet Pg. 142
Coder County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX, (239) 252-6358
Date of option:
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date:
AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether
individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County
immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, i attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result
in the delay of processing this petition.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
ATTN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
1 Naples, FL 34104
Date
Agent/Owner Name (please print)
Created 9/28/2017
Page 3 of 3
m
m
m
Packet Pg. 143
3.A.g
Cot
.I er County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
'ROPFRTY n%AiKirRc41ia nISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn
This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary.
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
percentage of such interest:
Name and Address I % of Ownership
LO
LO
LO
r
C
If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address I % of Ownership
If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest:
Name and Address I % of Ownership
Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3
Packet Pg. 144
Cot
.I er County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address I % of Ownership
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners:
f
f.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
McDowell Acquisitions, LLC
601 Brickell Key Drive Suite 700. Miami, FL 33131
which is owned 100% by
McDowell Properties Inc. - 100%
Date of Contract: 12/17/19
If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust:
Date subject property acquired
❑ Leased: Term of lease
Name and Address
years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Created 9/28/2017
Page 2 of 3
LO
LO
LO
r
Packet Pg. 145
Co er County
3.A.g
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
Date of option:
Date option terminates:
Anticipated closing date:
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
r•3r
r— AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I
Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether
individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County
immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result
in the delay of processing this petition.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
ATTN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
�04entOwner Signa r
V� s cxl_P%f
gen Owner Name please print)
Created 9/28/2017
J0 ZO-0
Dat
Page 3 of 3
LO
Ln
uO
Packet Pg. 146
3.A.g
ADDRESSING
CHECKLIST
T.-
LO
LO
LO
r
Packet Pg. 147 1
Collier County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division
at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y
Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing.
Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section.
PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
❑
BL (Blasting Permit)
❑
SDP (Site Development Plan)
❑
BD (Boat Dock Extension)
❑
SDPA (SDP Amendment)
❑
Carnival/Circus Permit
❑
SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP)
❑
CU (Conditional Use)
❑
SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
❑
EXP (Excavation Permit)
❑
SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP)
❑
FP (Final Plat
❑
SNR (Street Name Change)
❑
LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
❑
SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted)
❑
PNC (Project Name Change)
❑
TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
❑
PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
❑
VA (Variance)
❑
PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
❑
VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
❑
PUD Rezone
❑
VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
❑
RZ (Standard Rezone)
❑�
OTHER PUD Insubstantial Change
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES TRACT I
FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
48586003020
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
• LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right
of -way
• SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties)
CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
Hacienda Lakes MPUD - Tract I
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
TBD
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only)
SDP - or AR or PL # N/A
LO
LO
LO
Packet Pg. 148
46-
Collier County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
N/A
Please Return Approved Checklist By: [�] Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up
Applicant Name: Alexis Crespo
Phone: 239-850-8525
Email/Fax: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com �
LO
LO
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name
approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Folio Number 48586003020
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Approved by: V Date: 7/ 9/ 2 0 2 0
Updated by: Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Packet Pg. 149
3.A.g
UPDATED MASTER
MOBILITY PLAN
Packet Pg. 150 1
3.A.g
W
J
J
0
Proposed
Access
Proposed
Access
RATTLESNAKE
HAMMOCKRa
Q�
EXISTING
CAT
ROUTE 4A--
�QXWE
EXISTING
CAT
ROUTE 4A
i 48 .
Legend
I"Uy
CAT S70P75MEltER
`.W Ama . T.
Proposad CAT Ro.Ae 4A • 48 E~.nn
= 8wunass Palk W Scheu
Easing CAT Rowe 4A A 48
Jim Conn cw
Ci
Eaatap CAT Faway LA
Pream" Trace
l0
L "CAT F;.mq 48
Puck Fadimes Tract tEMSI
Easorq CAT Route 7
Junror Depwy
Prnpowd Pgeewt Fan�.Des
- Schw
.....
Eiseng Shared use Pala
Re.dentwg TrW
O.".a
a --dart
� Re.denuo r Medreai use
!
Jewopmem Bandery
Pud.c ROW Rpa m4
EXISTING CAT
ROUTE 7
(TO MARCO ISLAND)
i
1
/ DEVELOPER
PROPOSED CAT
1 STOP/SHELTER
THE LORD'S WAY
1 POTENTIAL
1 CAT STOP/SHELTER/
/ PROPOSED
1 4Ai40CAT
/ ROUTE EXTENSION
1 DEVELOPER
1 PROPOSED
/ CAT STOP/SHELTER
1
1 PROP. RATTLESNAKE
■ HAMMOCK RD. EXT._
I
Sp
EXISTING
EXISTING
CAT
CAT
FACILITY
FACILITY
4A (TYP)
49 (TYP)
Pvdaatrlan FeciliLl" WIN
as Edend" Mons"
IMvnY Rdada Evan it"slwswt
POTENTIAL
CAT STOP/SHELTER
Pad aciliWs WW
Be Alanq MI
aI Ro IMMnadtl m" at..
STATE
L AXDS
D7
LO
LO
r
:.OW DAVA a
Hacienda Lakes F. At "L a
Master Mobility Plan
Packet Pg. 151
�, «...e.. i"
3.A.g
LOCATION MAP
In
U)
Packet Pg. 152 1
3.A.g
w
J
?)
0
m
0
p
W
J
J
LL
J
=
F-
LELY CULTURAL PARKWAY
VILLA VERDE PDI
PREPARED FOR:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES,LLC
7742 ALICO ROAD
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33912
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD ............... ______-I
PROJECT
F-1 BOUNDARY
PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: COLLIERCOUNTY
23 50 26 FLORMA
FILE NAME:
SHEET: 1 OF 1
NORTH
NOT TG SCALE
IAIENGINEERIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC
Lo
28100 BONI GRANDE DRIVE - SLIDE 305 1
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135
P: 239-405-7777 F. 239-405-7899
EMAIL: inlo@walOropengineering.com
Packet Pg. 153
3.A.g
SIGN POST
AFFIDAVIT
& SIGN
PHOTOS
r
Lo
Lo
Lo
r
Packet Pg. 154 1
3.A.g
(CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT)
A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar
days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through
the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not
be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative
Code, Chapter 8 E.
1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or
easement.
2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened
securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage.
3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action
has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the
petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s
NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE
RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE
ASSIGNED PLANNER
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
ul)
LO
LO
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED � W�� S Cr�o
I N
WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE N
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER c
�L aD2f� GOOD a
o�(8\ 6 D &d`n l C-1V-CL Q-- PV • w
SIGNATuk&Of AVKICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX =
0
A x IS V)�5
NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this U tV 1 day of Ftv 20 �( by
leX (5 Cry personally known to me or who produced as identification
and who did/did not take an oath.
E
-SICA KLINN
of Florlde-�lotary PublicM1§@10 l # GG 170873 COMMIBsion Expires
April 16, 2022
My Commission Expires:
(Stamp with serial number)
tgn ure o Notary Public
6, K Ur)n
Printed Name of Notary Public
Rev. 3/4/2015
Packet Pg. 155
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
ni i r-r..Rn 14Ar-lFrj nA SAKES PDI 0
T-
LC)
Lo
Lo
n
I Packet Pg. 156
3.A.h
From: Andrew Dickman
To: Lindsay Robin; Alexis Cresoo; Jackie Larocaue
Cc: Heather; BellowsRav; SaboJames
Subject: NIM WAIVER: Allegro at Hacienda Lakes Senior Housing PDI - NIM Waiver Request (PL20200001294)
Date: Monday, January 25, 2021 12:10:45 PM
WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL: PLEASE VERIFY SENDER BEFORE OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR
CLICKING ON LINKS.
Dear Ms. Robin:
You have requested a waiver of the neighborhood information meeting (NIM) in connection with the
above referenced application. Pursuant to Sec. 10.03.06(H)(2)(a) of the Collier County land
development code, a NIM is required for your application except "upon written request by the
applicant, the Hearing Examiner has the discretion to waive the NIM after the first set of staff review
comments have been issued."
I have reviewed your request and I have been informed by county staff that the first set of staff LO
review comments have been issued and county staff has stated they have no objections. If this is LO
not correct, please let me know immediately.
Based on the above information, your NIM waiver request is GRANTED, with one condition. If any
opposition to your application occurs between the granting of this waiver and the public hearing, I
reserve the right to reschedule the hearing and require the holding of a NIM.
Sincerely,
Andrew
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Collier County Hearing Examiner
(239) 434-0840
https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-f-r/hearing-examiner
All government correspondence is subject to the public records low.
Packet Pg. 157
DocuSign Envelope ID: C68BFC1 B-EA83-4E99-B26E-C92657875294
3.A.i
Cof be-r County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliercountvfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04
Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner
For Petition Number(s): PL202000001294
Regarding the above subject petition number(s), McDowell Acquisitions LLC c/o Chris Shear (Name of
Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the
Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the
hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing.
Name: Chris Shear
McDowell Acquisitions, LLC
rosf"DoccuSigned by:
Signature: " S"
R] Applicant*
11 Legal Counsel to Applicant
Date: 4/6/2021
* This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an
officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant.
Packet Pg. 158
04/22/2021
COLLIER COUNTY
Collier County Hearing Examiner
Item Number: 4.A
Item Summary: Pursuant to Chapter 9 of the Collier County Administrative Code, a consideration
of the applicant's motion to rehear petition of the Kapok St Cell Tower Variance - PL20190002701 (HEX
Decision 2021-10) for the purpose of whether to grant the motion and establishing a HEX hearing date
for the rehearing.
Meeting Date: 04/22/2021
Prepared by:
Title: Operations Analyst — Planning Commission
Name: Diane Lynch
04/13/2021 2:08 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning
Name: Anita Jenkins
04/13/2021 2:08 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item
Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky
Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item
Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item
Hearing Examiner
Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending
Completed 04/13/2021 2:08 PM
Review Item Completed
Completed 04/13/2021 4:14 PM
Completed 04/14/2021 2:28 PM
04/22/2021 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 159