Loading...
Agenda 09/08/2020 Item #17B (PL20180003229)09/08/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to a variance request from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. The subject property, consisting of 7.02+/- acres, is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20180003229] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property, consisting of 7.02± acres, is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The petitioner is requesting to have the Board consider a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. Crown Castle USA, Inc. (“Crown”) proposes to construct a 195 ft. wireless communications tower (“Proposed Tower”) at the property located within the Richland PUD behind the existing commercial uses and buffered from nearby residential areas by significant preserve lands. The Tower is a relocation of a tower that was required to be removed from 9100 Immokalee Road (“Existing Tower”) - which is approximately 0.60 miles from the subject property. The landlord required the Existing Tower to be removed this year due to the development of single-family homes nearby by the landlord. The landlord and Crown entered into a short-term arrangement to allow for temporary towers to continue to be located on the Existing Tower site during the permitting and construction of the proposed tower. The Existing Tower has existed at 199 ft. for over 20 years providing essential cellular service to the growing residential community and the necessary coverage to support the nearby hospital and emergency services. Existing Tower receives 911 calls daily, and the tower is the closest tower to the hospital. The proposed tower is located nearly the same distance from the hospital (.42 miles). The Proposed Tower’s location behind the existing commercial uses is on a piece of land that is a stormwater pond; therefore, it is regulated by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (“SWFWMD”). Construction of the tower requires an Environmental Resource Permit from SWFWMD, which dictates what actions Crown can take in construction of the Proposed Tower so as not to adversely affect the quality and flow of stormwater in the stormwater pond system. The location of the Pr oposed Tower in this stormwater pond affects all aspects of construction of the Proposed Tower, including the fact that an opaque wall cannot be built around the Proposed Tower because a wall that does not permit the free flow of stormwater will adversely change and affect the stormwater pond system. A chain-link 17.B Packet Pg. 3173 09/08/2020 fence that allows free flow of water must be constructed instead, and appropriate landscape buffering will be planted on-site. As provided in the enclosed letter from T-Mobile (See Attachment B - Backup Materials), this tower is essential to providing the statutory E911 services pursuant to Florida Statutes 365.172 et seq. According to a 2016 study, over 90% of households have at least one mobile phone, and 48% of households rely exclusively on their mobile phones. Most importantly, 80% of all 911 calls originate from wireless devices, according to a 911.gov study conducted in 2017. In the past several years, reliance on cellular devices has only increased. Without a new tower at the height of a minimum of 195 ft., several carriers will lose coverage along portions of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd and others will experience a degradation in coverage within their businesses and homes. Therefore, the applicant requests a variance form LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(2)(a), which allows for a height variance from the permitted 185 maximum height to 195 ft. for sufficient coverage for emergency services and wireless communication coverage. The tower is located in a PUD commercial zone with the following required setbacks: Front (25 ft), Side (ten feet) and Rear (20 ft). The Tower itself is located at more than 158 feet from the closest property line. The nearest residential area is over 540 ft. away where the required setback is 488 ft. The applicant has also provided a fall zone letter stating that in the event of a theoretical fall, the proposed tower has a point of buckle (fall point) at 137 ft. - well below the distance to any of the adjacent property lines and the nearest residential property. (See Attachment B - Backup Materials). The applicant is not currently requesting any setback variances based on the PUD setbacks. [NOTE: previously, the applicant desired to request setback variances as the tower was over proposed at over 250 feet in height, which would have required a 600-foot setback to the nearest residential area; the applicant has modified its request accordingly to avoid any request for a variance to setbacks to residential areas]. FISCAL IMPACT: The Variance by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build-out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the Variance is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is located within the Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict (MUA), Activity Center 3 on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the broader issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks a variance from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for the construction of a new communications tower and a chain-link fence. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested Variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. 17.B Packet Pg. 3174 09/08/2020 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition VA-PL20180003229 on July 2, 2020, and by a vote of 5-0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board of Zoning Appeals with a recommendation of approval with no stipulations. There was no opposition to the petition. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Petitioner is requesting a Variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. The granting of such a Variance is permitted under LDC §9.04.02. The attached staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed Variance is consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question the Petitioner or staff to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. LDC Section 10.09.00 F. requires that “Upon consideration of the Planning Commission’s report, findings and recommendations, and upon consideration of the standards and guidelines set forth [below], the Board of Zoning Appeals shall approve, by resolution, or deny a petition for a variance.” Should you consider denying the Variance to assure that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. In granting any variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals may prescribe the following: 1. Appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the zoning code or other applicable county ordinances. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the Variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the zoning code. 2. A reasonable time limit within which the action for which the Variance required shall be begun or completed or both. Criteria for Variances 1. There are special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 2. There are special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the Variance request. 3. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC work an unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. 4. The Variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, or welfare. 5. Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. 17.B Packet Pg. 3175 09/08/2020 6. Granting, the Variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the LDC and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 7. There are natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. 8. Granting the Variance will be consistent with the GMP. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires a majority vote for Board approval.- SAA RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Resolution and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower with one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment B- Backup Materials (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (PDF) 5. Attachment D - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- Richland Communication Tower (PDF) 6. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 12285 (PDF) 17.B Packet Pg. 3176 09/08/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.B Doc ID: 12285 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to a variance request from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. The subject property, consisting of 7.02+/- acres, is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20180003229] Meeting Date: 09/08/2020 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 07/16/2020 1:50 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 07/16/2020 1:50 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 07/16/2020 2:27 PM Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 07/27/2020 4:29 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 08/03/2020 8:48 AM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 08/05/2020 2:08 PM County Attorney's Office Sally Ashkar Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 08/17/2020 8:36 AM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 08/17/2020 8:46 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 08/17/2020 11:36 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 08/20/2020 6:44 PM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 09/01/2020 12:11 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 09/08/2020 9:00 AM 17.B Packet Pg. 3177 VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 1 of 9 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 2, 2020 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20180003229 (RICHLAND COMMUNICATION TOWER) _____________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Plaza 35 – Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC; Crown Castle USA, Inc. Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC 301 N. Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 P.O. Box 230 Oceanport, NJ 07757 Sarasota, FL 34232 Agent: Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800 Clearwater, FL 33755 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communication tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code to require only one chain- link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 0.147+/- acres of a 7.02+/- acre parcel and is located on the west side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), approximately 1,000 feet south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on page 2). 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3178 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 2 of 9 17.B.1Packet Pg. 3179Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 3 of 9 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Through staff discussion, it was determined that the proposed communications tower is deemed an essential use as this will provide essential cellular service to the growing residential communities and necessary coverage to support hospital and emergency services. It shall be noted that per Section IV, 4-3(A) of the Richland PUD, essential services are allowable uses. Per Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the LDC, any tower that exceeds seventy-five (75) feet in height, up to a height of 185 feet, is a lawful use. Because carriers require communications towers to be 200 feet or above for sufficient coverage, the applicant is requesting the tower to be 195 feet (a ten-foot height variance) and a variance for a chain-link fence. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the subject property: North: Commercial uses, zoned Richland PUD East: Commercial uses, zoned Richland PUD South: Preserves, zoned Richland PUD West: Preserves, zoned Richland PUD Collier County Property Appraiser 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3180 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 4 of 9 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict (MUA), Activity Center 3 on the County’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the petitioner seeks a variance from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for the construction of a new communications tower and a chain-link fence. The subject use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Crown Castle USA, Inc. (“Crown”) proposes to construct a 195 ft. wireless communications tower (“Proposed Tower”) at the property located within the Richland PUD behind the existing commercial uses and buffered from nearby residential areas by significant preserve lands. The Tower is a relocation of a tower that was required to be removed from 9100 Immokalee Road (“Existing Tower”) – which is approximately 0.60 miles from the subject property. The landlord required the Existing Tower to be removed this year due to the development of single-family homes nearby by the landlord. The landlord and Crown entered into a short-term arrangement to allow for temporary towers to continue to be located on the Existing Tower site during the permitting and construction of the proposed tower. The Existing Tower has existed at 199 ft. for over 20 years providing essential cellular service to the growing residential community and the necessary coverage to support the nearby hospital and emergency services. Existing Tower receives 911 calls daily and the tower is the closest tower to the hospital. The proposed tower is located nearly the same distance from the Hospital (.42 miles). The Proposed Tower’s location behind the existing commercial uses is on a piece of land that is a stormwater pond, therefore it is regulated by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (“SWFWMD”). Construction of the tower requires an Environmental Resource Permit from SWFWMD, which dictates what actions Crown can take in construction of the Proposed Tower so as to not adversely affect the quality and flow of stormwaters in the stormwater pond system. The location of the Proposed Tower in this stormwater pond affects all aspects of construction of the Proposed Tower, including the fact that an opaque wall cannot be built around the Proposed Tower, because a wall that does not permit the free flow of stormwater will adversely change and affect the stormwater pond system. A chain-link fence that allows free flow of water must be constructed instead, and appropriate landscape buffering will be planted on-site. As provided in the enclosed letter from T-Mobile (See Attachment B - Backup Materials), this tower is essential to providing the statutory E911 services pursuant to Florida Statutes 365.172 et seq. According to a 2016 study, over 90% of households have at least one mobile phone and 48% of households rely exclusively on their mobile phones. Most importantly, 80% of all 911 calls originate from wireless devises according to a 911.gov study conducted in 2017. In the past several years, reliance on cellular devices has only increased. Without a new tower at a height of a minimum of 195 ft., several carriers will lose coverage along portions of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd and others will experience a degradation in coverage within their businesses and homes. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3181 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 5 of 9 Therefore, the applicant requests a variance form LDC Section 5.05.09(G)(2)(a) which allows for a height variance from the permitted 185 maximum height to 195 ft. for sufficient coverage for emergency services and wireless communication coverage. The tower is located in a PUD commercial zone with the following required setbacks: Front (25 ft), Side (ten feet) and Rear (20 ft). The Tower itself is located at more than 158 feet from the closest property line. The nearest residential area is over 540 ft. away where the required setback is 488 ft. T he applicant has also provided a fall zone letter stating that in the event of a theoretical fall, the proposed tower has a point of buckle (fall point) at 137 ft. – well below the distance to any of the adjacent property lines and the nearest residential property. (See Attachment B - Backup Materials). The applicant is not currently requesting any setback variances based on the PUD setbacks. [NOTE: previously, the applicant desired to request setback variances as the tower was over proposed at over 250 feet in height which would have required a 600 ft. setback to the nearest residential area; the applicant has modified its request accordingly to avoid any request for a variance to setbacks to residential areas]. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposal is consistent with the CCME. Section 9.04.01 of the Land Development Code gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant Variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Section 9.04.03 A. through H. (in bold font below), as general guidelines to assist in making their recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? The request for height variance is due to the requirements of carriers to have a tower at 200 feet or above; due to setback restrictions and sensitivity to the neighborhood, the applicant has limited the request to 195 feet (a ten-foot height variance). The structure of a wireless communication tower requires certain heights to meet the needs of the carriers. For the carriers to provide sufficient E911 coverage and service to this area, the minimum height necessary is 195 feet. The request for wall variance (from the opaque wall requirement of section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code) is due to the unique location of the site in a stormwater pond, which affects construction on-site due to regulation by SWFWMD. The tower and supporting equipment is proposed to be constructed on a platform to minimize adverse effects of the quality and flow of stormwater; therefore, an opaque wall on a platform would not be practical; further, constructing a wall around the platform would impact the stormwater pond and its functionality. Crown intends to build a chain-link fence in the same required height and area as the opaque wall would be required on the platform and install landscaping outside of the platform area to add additional buffer. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3182 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 6 of 9 b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? The existing tower which is being replaced is 195 feet. The carriers require at minimum the same height to be able to maintain service in the area and the proposed site is the only available site after an exhaustive search. The nature of the location as a stormwater pond is a pre-existing condition on-site and is not due to the actions of Crown. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The literal interpretation of the Code to limit a tower in this area to 185 feet creates a practical difficulty as the service and coverage requirement is not maintained and the need for a tower lessened. Copies of coverages are included in this application. (See Attachment B - Backup Materials) The literal interpretation of the Code to require an opaque wall on-site creates a practical difficulty as it would result barrier to the free flow and quality of stormwater on site and will run afoul of SWFWMD regulations. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes, the ten-foot variance is the minimum necessary to allow for sufficient coverage and replacement of the existing tower. As to the wall, a chain link fence that matches the dimensional requirements of the Code’s opaque wall, in conjunction with appropriate landscape buffering, is the minimum necessary to avoid adverse interference with the stormwater pond on-site. As the location sits behind existing commercial uses, a chain link fence with landscape buffering will adequately buffer the Proposed Tower. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes, by definition, a Variance bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. However, LDC Section 9.04.02 provides relief through the Variance process for any dimensional development standard, such as the requested height increase and chain-link fence. As such, other properties facing a similar hardship would be entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case by case basis. 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3183 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 7 of 9 f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the code to allow for a tower with a height to accommodate up to four provider antennae. The wall variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to ensure adequate fencing and buffering on-site, which the chain link fence and landscape buffering will satisfy. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? The proposed tower is near a natural preserve but set back more than half the tower height and greater than the breakpoint. The height variance does not impact any natural areas. The chain link fence will promote the preservation of the existing stormwater pond on-site, and the nearby natural preserve in conjunction with the proposed landscaping will cause the Proposed Tower to blend nicely with the area where it will sit behind the existing commercial uses. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION Environmental Planning staff has reviewed this petition. The existing preserve areas will not be impacted by the proposed petition. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PL20180003229 revised on June 19, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition VA- PL20180003229, Richland Communication Tower Variance to increase the allowable height of a communication tower from 185 feet to 195 feet in order to allow for construction of a new communications tower, and a variance from Section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Land Development Code 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3184 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) VA-PL20180003229 (Richland Communication Tower) Revised: June 22, 2020 Page 8 of 9 to require only one chain-link fence around the perimeter of the communication tower and the required landscaping on the outside of the chain-link fence Attachments: A) Proposed Resolution B) Backup Materials 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3185 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) PREPARED BY: _______________________________________ _____________________ TIMOTHY FINN, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ ______________________ RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ ______________________ JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 17.B.1 Packet Pg. 3186 Attachment: Staff report - Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 3187 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2 Packet Pg. 3188 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3189Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3190Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3191Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3192Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3193Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3194Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.2Packet Pg. 3195Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Resolution (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) stc N Pos'It N(; I NS't'Rtr(11't0Ns (('l In I''l'l:lt lt. COLl.ll;R ('Ot lN l'\' n I)MlNlS'l'lt^'l'lVli C'ODIi IrOR Ln Nt) I)l-lVl;l.Ol'}lvllrNl') (irdc. Chaptcr' 8 l:. l. 'l'hc sign(s) rnust bc ct'cctcd in lull vicrv ol'the public. not nrorc lhan llvc (5) l'cet lionr thc nearest street right-of'-rvay or eascltlcnt. sccurcly to a post. or otlrcr structurc. 'l'hc si-en nla)' not bc allixcd lo a tt'cc or other lbliagc. 3. -fhc pctitioncr or thc pctitioncr's agcrlt nrust nlaintain thc sign(s) in placc. and rcadablc condition until the requcsted action has bcerr hcald and a linal dccisiott rcndctctl. Il'thc sign(s) is clcstroyccl. Iost. or rcndclcd r.rnrcadablc. the pctitioncl or the petitioner''s agcnt nrust rcplace thc sign(s NOTE: AFTER TIIE SIGN llAS BIiEN POSTED, Tllls AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINC NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER TTIAN ]'EN (IO) }VORKING DAYS BEFORE TI{E ITIRST TIEARING DATE TO 'TIIE ASSIGNE,D PLANNER. n Ijt:tDn vt't'ol; Pos'l'tN(; No'l'tcti s I'A't'ti otj Ijl.oRll)n cot JN't'Y olj cot.t.l tiR IltiF0tili'l I Itr LjNDlrltslcNtiD n tJ I ilot{t'l'y. t,t:ttsoNn LLy n pl,lin I{DD Jaime R' Maier WIIO ON OAl'l I SAYS 'l'llA'l' llli/SIlll lln S I'}OS'l'lrD I'ltOPIlR NO'l'lCL n S Ii.ljQLJIllllD BY SIICTION 10.03.00 Ol: 'l'llti COI,I,IER COlJNTY I,NND I)I]VHI,OPM[N-I'(]oDI, ON'I'IIE I)AItC]IiI, C]OVI]RED IN PI]]'I]'ION NT-IMI}TiR, PL2O1 101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 3700 n'f[JRE OIr API'l.lCnN'l' OR n(ilrNl's'f [lBtil'oR P.o. Box Nn MLI (TYPFll) OR l'ltlN'l'l:l)) u. M,r' Corlnrission I :x;rilcs: (Stanrp u'ith sclial rtunrbcr) Sl'A'I'E OF FI-OIIIDA co(iN'l'Y oF c{)t-l#Il //.eLstS o '14 u < q 't'he lirregoing instrunrclrt was s\\{)nr to ancl subsclibcd bclilrc nrc this /? f da} o -Xatad - ?e I * -. pcrsottallr kttorvtr to tttc or l.lro pt'trclttcccl and rrho did/did not lakc an oath Jvn'n24tt' as idcntilication -n41J,. 3/24 signiiirrt,.rJ N,,tan iiuf,tic -T- I Al)rtx 4<,of iirinr.t N,rnic ,il'Ntrrar.7 I\rblic - AIUSON REED tfY coMMtsslot'l # @ 182578 D0IRES:June 2, ?022 Bo{rded Ihru llobty Publh und€Mrltolt Rev.3l4l2015 Jaime R. Maier, Esq.Tampa, FL 33602 ___ CI'I'Y. S]'A]'E ZIP 17.B.4 Packet Pg. 3196 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) I \'-.. l:,'r . \ 7r* I*. 't'^"f.'I'4: ' ,:, rt '.' .#',. : .6'. .,:,..:r! ,j't ", $,. *S,.':;. f'. . i: i.,i" PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE RICHLAND COMMUNICATION TOWER VARIANCE PETITION NO. PL201 80003229 ,iL '{h: TF6--".5*g r_-.1 -/;5-1 CCPC: July 2nd 2020 - 9:00am BCC: September 8th 2O2O - 9:00am BCC MEETING ROOM - COLLIER COUNTY GOVT, CENTER 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES FL34112 TIMOTHY FINN, AICP: 239-252-4312 I rc;*&tp.a.' .J I e l. .,.fl SERVICEs- '2:,gg)."2(D' tJ ",4I 7 41,'il bt*r :.J--t _t [,: [' ,] 17.B.4 Packet Pg. 3197 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) I r * 1' I I I CCPC: July 2n BCC: September BLIC PETITION NO. 2 8th I BCC MEETING ROOM. TIMOTHY 3299 EAST {-vr- rt -j t{ 1 17.B.4 Packet Pg. 3198 Attachment: Attachment C - Property Hearing Signs (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) 17.B.5 Packet Pg. 3199 Attachment: Attachment D - Waiver Applicant for hybrid quasi-judicial hearing- Richland Communication Tower (12285 : Richland 17.B.6Packet Pg. 3200Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID 12285 (12285 : Richland Communication Tower - Variance) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT    2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE  GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT     NAPLES, FLORIDA  34104  www.colliergov.net  (239) 252‐2400 FAX: (239) 252‐6358 4/27/2018 Page 1 of 6  VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION  Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District  LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2‐83 – 2‐90  Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code    PROJECT NUMBER  PROJECT NAME  DATE PROCESSED    APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION  Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________  Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________    Address: _________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ________  Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________  E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________  Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________  Firm: _________________________________________________________________________  Address: ___________________________City: ________________ State: _______ ZIP: ______  Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ___________________ Fax: ____________________  E‐Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________      BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS.  GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND  ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.                    To be completed by staff  Crown Castle USA, Inc Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 800 Clearwater FL 33755 727-259-6791 katie.cole@hwhlaw.com 301 N. Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota FL 34232 Plaza 35-Pebblebrooke Naples, LLC, and Pebblebrooke-Naples, LLC COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 2 of 6 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: ____________________ Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: _____________________________________ Unit: _____Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: __________________________________ Total Acreage: ______ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: Corner Lot: Yes No Side: Waterfront Lot: Yes No Rear: Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 3 of 6 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: _____ NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing prin cipal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 4 of 6 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No If yes, please provide copies. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 4/27/2018 Page 5 of 6 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre-Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” x 36” and one 8 ½ ” x 11” copy Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal’s 3 Location map 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 15205 Collier Boulevard Communications Tower as Essential Service Variance for Tower Height (185 ft. permitted; 195 ft. requested) and Variance for Wall (Opaque required; Chain Link requested) Crown Castle USA (“Crown”) proposes to construct a 195 ft. wireless communications tower (“Proposed Tower”) at the property located within the Richland PUD behind the existing commercial uses and buffered from nearby residential areas by significant preserve lands. The Tower is a relocation of a tower that was required to be removed from 9100 Immokalee Road (“Existing Tower”) – which is approximately 0.60 miles from the subject property. The landlord required the Existing Tower to be removed this year due to the development of single family homes nearby by the landlord. The landlord and Crown entered into a short-term arrangement to allow for temporary towers to continue to be located on the Existing Tower site during the permitting and construction of the proposed tower. The Existing Tower has existed at 199 ft. for over 20 years providing essential cellular service to the growing residential community and the necessary coverage to support the nearby hospital and emergency services. Existing Tower receives 911 calls daily and the tower is the closest towe r to the hospital. The proposed tower is located nearly the same distance from the Hospital (.42 miles). The Proposed Tower’s location behind the existing commercial uses is on a piece of land that is a stormwater pond, therefore it is regulated by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (“SWFWMD”). Construction of the tower requires an Environmental Resource Permit from SWFWMD, which dictates what actions Crown can take in construction of the Proposed Tower so as to not adversely affect the quality and flow of stormwaters in the stormwater pond system. The location of the Proposed Tower in this stormwater pond affects all aspects of construction of the Proposed Tower, including the fact that an opaque wall cannot be built around the Proposed Tower, because a wall that does not permit the free flow of stormwater will adversely change and affect the stormwater pond system. A wall that allows free flow of water must be constructed instead, and appropriate landscape buffering will be planted on-site. As provided in the enclosed letter from T-mobile, this tower is essential to providing the statutory E911 services pursuant to Florida Statutes 365.172 et seq. According to a 2016 study, over 90% of households have at least one mobile phone and 48% of households rely exclusively on their mobile phones. Most importantly, 80% of all 911 calls originate from wireless devises according to a 911.gov study conducted in 2017. In the past several years, reliance on cellular devices has only increased. Without a new tower at a height of 195 ft., several carriers will lose coverage along portions of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd and others will experience a degradation in coverage within their businesses and homes. Consideration of Criteria: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved? The request for height variance is due to the requirements of carriers to have a tower at 200 feet or above; due to setback restrictions and sensitivity to the neighborhood, the applicant has limited the request to 195 feet (a ten foot height variance). The structure of a wireless communication tower requires certain heights to meet the needs of the carriers. For the carriers to provide sufficient E911 coverage and service to this area, the minimum height necessary is 195 feet. The request for wall variance (from the opaque wall requirement of section 4.06.05.B.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code) is due to the unique location of the site in a stormwater pond, which affects construction on-site due to regulation by SWFWMD. The tower and supporting equipment is proposed to be constructed on a platform to minimize adverse affects of the quality and flow of stormwater; therefore, an opaque wall on a platform would not be practical; further, constructing a wall around the platform would impact the stormwater pond and its functionality. Crown intends to build a chain-link fence in the same required height and area as the opaque wall would be required on the platform, and install landscaping outside of the platform area to add additional buffer. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request? The existing tower which is being replaced is 195 feet. The carriers require at minimum the same height to be able to maintain service in the area and the proposed site is the only available site after an exhaustive search. The nature of the location as a stormwater pond is a pre-existing condition on-site and is not due to the actions of Crown. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the application or create practical difficulties on the applicant? The literal interpretation of the Code to limit a tower in this area to 185 feet creates a practical difficulty as the service and coverage requirement is not maintained and the need for a tower lessened. Copies of coverages are included in this application. The literal interpretation of the Code to require an opaque wall on-site creates a practical difficulty as it would result barrier to the free flow and quality of stormwater on site, and will run afoul of SWFWMD regulations. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare? Yes as to the tower height. The ten foot variance is the minimum necessary to allow for sufficient coverage and replacement of the existing tower. Yes as to the wall. A chain link fence that matches the dimensional requirements of the Code’s opaque wall, in conjunction with appropriate landscape buffering, is the minimum necessary to avoid adverse interference with the stormwater pond on-site. As the location sits behind existing commercial uses, a chain link fence with landscape buffering will adequately buffer the Proposed Tower. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No. Wireless Towers are essential services and permitted in all zoning districts and in PUDs without exception or extraordinary requirements pursuant to the zoning code. Therefore gra nting both the tower height and wall variances will not confer any special, otherwise denied privilege. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? The tower height variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to allow for a tower with a height to accommodate up to four provider antennae. The wall variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Code to ensure adequate fencing and buffering on-site, which the chain link fence and landscape buffering will satisfy. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc? 14061564v1 The Proposed Tower is near a natural preserve but set back more than half the tower height and greater than the breakpoint. The height variance does not impact any natural areas. The chain link fence will promote the preservation of the existing stormwater pond on-site, and the nearby natural preserve in conjunction with the proposed landscaping will cause the Proposed Tower to blend nicely with the area where it will sit behind the existing commercial uses. h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes. The variances will allow for the Proposed Tower to be placed on-site, both as to the necessary height and the necessary chain link as opposed to opaque fence. The placement of the Proposed Tower in this location allows for maintained emergency services and consistent wireless communication coverage in the community where the Existing Tower must be removed. ^_ 830336 Verizon with 830336 ^_^_815732 Verizon with 815732 ^_ 830336 T-Mobile with 830336 ^_^_815732 T-Mobile with 815732 ^_ 830336 Sprint with 830336 ^_^_815732 Sprint with 815732 Crown Castle 4511 North Himes Avenue, Suite #210 Tampa, FL 33614 EXISTING SITE: 815731 - Randall 9100 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 33964 Address: Latitude: 26° 16’ 22.10” Longitude: -81° 40' 56.30" Tower Type: Monopole Tower AGL: 199.33’ Ground AMSL: 17’ CANDIDATE SITE: Candidate C – Pebblebrook 15205 Collier Blvd., Naples, FL 34119 Address: Latitude: 26° 16' 12.7848" Longitude: -81° 41’ 29.724" Tower Type: Monopole Tower AGL: Ground AMSL: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: ___________ f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: (In rear of building at 15215 Collier Blvd) - PEBBLEBROOKE COMM PHASE IV TRACT 1 27-48-26 66261900022 8/29/19 Variance - PL20180003229 Variance - PL20180003229 Variance -PL20180003229 (Communication Tower Relocation) Legal Description 13009240v1 RANDALL RELO / 8308336195' MONOPOLEZONING DRAWINGSSITE INFORMATIONSHEET INDEXSITE NAME:SITE NUMBER:PARENT PARCEL ADDRESS:PROPERTY OWNER:APPLICANT:PARCEL NUMBER:ACREAGE OF PARENT PARCEL:ACREAGE OF PROPOSED LEASE AREA:PARCEL'S ZONING DISTRICT:PARCEL'S FUTURE LAND USE:SITE TYPE:COUNTY:JURISDICTION:SITE COORDINATES:STRUCTURE TYPE:TOWER HEIGHT:THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION;THEREFORE, THERE IS NO HANDICAP ACCESS REQUIRED.THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS NOT INTENDED FOR PERMANENTEMPLOYEE OCCUPANCY; THEREFORE, ADDITIONAL SITE PARKING ISNOT REQUIRED.OCCUPANCY IS LIMITED TO PERIODIC MAINTENANCE ANDINSPECTION BY TECHNICIANS APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH.DOES NOT REQUIRE POTABLE WATER, SEPTIC TANKS OR SANITARYSERVICE.NO EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS OR WATER LINES ARE IN THE VICINITYOF THE PROPOSED TOWER.RANDALL RELO830833615205 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119PEBBLEBROOKS RETAIL INVESTORSCROWN CASTLE66261900022±7.020.147PUDPUBRAWLANDCOLLIERCOLLIER COUNTYN 26° 16' 12.77" (LAT)W 81° 41' 29.69" (LON)MONOPOLE195' AGLwww.sunshine811.comT-1TITLE SHEETRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESITESITECROWNCASTLE COLLIER BLVD. (CR 591)SCALE: 1" = 100'OVERALL SITE PLANZ-11SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALEZ-1OVERALLSITE PLANTOWER SETBACK TABLEZ-1SCALE: N. T. S.AERIAL PLAN2RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEOVERALL PLATFORM SETBACK TABLE SCALE: N.T.S.TOWER ELEVATIONZ-22Z-2ENLARGED SITE PLAN& TOWER ELEVATIONSCALE: 1" = 40'SITE PLANZ-21SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALERANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PE Z-3FENCE DETAILSRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESCALE: N.T.S.FENCE DETAILZ-33SCALE: N.T.S.TYPICAL STYMIE LOCK DETAILZ-31 15.0 15.015.014.015.0 15.0 15.0 1 5 . 0 13.014.015.015.015.0 15.013.30 ME13.68 ME13.23 ME13.34 ME13.013.014.015.0 13.23 ME13.012.32SCALE: 1" = 40'GRADING PLANZ-41SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALERANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-4GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN        SECTIONCONTROL STRUCTURE BOTTOM OF WEIRSTORM PIPE OUT FLOW ¢PLANSTORM PIPE OUT FLOW ¢SCALE: N.T.S. FILTREXX CONTROL STRUCTURE SEDIMENT PROTECTION SYSTEMZ-42SCALE: 1" = 20'GRADING PLAN DETAILZ-43SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALE 12.3 2SCALE: 1" : 600'AERIAL PLANZ-51SCALE BASED ON 11"x17" ONLYGRAPHIC SCALEZ-5AERIAL PLANRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PECOLLIER BLVD. (CR 591)IMMOKALEE ROAD RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-6SITE SIGNAGEAAACAUTIONNOTICEWARNINGPRIVATEPROPERTYWARNINGSCALE: N.T.S.SITE SIGNAGE DETAILZ-61SCALE: N.T.S.TYPICAL SIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONSZ-62 RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-7PLATFORM DETAILSSCALE: N.T.S.CANOPY WITH EQUIPMENT PLATFORMZ-71 RANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PEZ-8PLATFORM DETAILSSCALE: N.T.S.EQUIPMENT PLATFORMZ-81 12.32L-1LANDSCAPING PLANRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PESCALE: 1" = 10' (11"x17")LANDSCAPE PLANL-11BOTANICALNAMECOMMONNAMESIZEREMARKSQTYSPREADSPACINGSYMBOL25' OC113.5" CAL. MIN/ 12' HT.STRAIGHT,SINGLELEADER3' SPR. MIN.PLANTING SCHEDULETAXODIUMDISTICHUMBALD CYPRESS3' OC3 GAL /16" MIN HT.SAND CORDGRASS58SPARTINA BAKERILANDSCAPING NOTES:1.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FLORIDA #1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN, GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS,CURRENT EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES.2.SIZES SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST ARE MINIMUM SIZES TO WHICH THE PLANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED. TRUNK CALIPER ISMEASURED SIX INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND ON TREES.3.ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY STANDARDS ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN A NEAT, HEALTHY, AND WEED FREE CONDITION.4.IT IS THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ALL PLANT BED AREAS HAVE PROPER DRAINAGEFOR OPTIMUM GROWTH OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL BEFORE INSTALLATION BEGINS.5.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEADUTILITIES. PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE LOCATED SUCH THAT IT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY UNDERGROUND OROVERHEAD UTILITIES.6.ALL PLANT BEDS AND TREE RINGS SHALL BE TREATED WITH A PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE AND THEN TOP-DRESSED WITH3" DEEP PINE BARK MULCH. ALL NEW TREES SHALL HAVE A TREE RING WITH A MINIMUM 24" RADIUS, ALL NEW TREES ANDPALMS SHALL BE STAKED.7.THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING FOR 1 YEAR FROM THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO WATERING AND INSURING THAT THE LANDSCAPING DOES NOT DIE. IF ANY OF THELANDSCAPING DIES WITHIN THE 1 YEAR TIME FRAME, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE IT WITH EQUIVALENTLANDSCAPING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF OBSERVING THE DEAD PLANT MATERIAL. LANDSCAPING WILL BE WATERED A MINIMUMOF TWICE WEEKLY FOR 3-6 MONTHS UNTIL FULLY ESTABLISHED. EACH TREE TO RECEIVE 3 TO 6 GALLONS OF WATER EACHTIME IT IS IRRIGATED AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE 1/2 TO 2 GALLONS PER IRRIGATION. ALL WATERING TO BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IFAS EXTENSION RECOMMENDATIONS. AFTER THIS 1 YEAR ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, THELANDOWNER OF RECORD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE OF THIS LANDSCAPING.8.CONTRACTOR MUST CONFIRM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION.9.IF EXISTING TREES REMAIN, LOCATION/SPACING OF NEW TREES MAY BE MODIFIED TO AVOID CONFLICT.10.ALL REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3’  FEET FROM A PROPERTY LINE AND 6’ FEET FROM ANYUTILITIES (ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND). ALL TREES PLANTED AND PRUNED MUST ADHERE TO THE ANSI A300 STANDARDSAND MUST HAVE ADEQUATE ROOM, WHEN PLANTED, TO MATURE FREELY.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL NUISANCE, EXOTIC PLANT MATERIAL. REMOVAL OF NUISANCE, EXOTIC PLANT SPECIESTHAT BECOME REESTABLISHED WITHIN COMMON, AND OPEN SPACES, SHALL BE CONTINUED FOR THE LIFE OF THEPROJECT.36" MINMISC. QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SPECIFICATIONSSODTBD PASPALUM NOTATUM 'ARGENTINE'/ ARGENTINE BAHIA GRASS ROLLED TIGHT, 100% WEED/INSECT/DISEASE FREEPROPOSED 195'MONOPOLE(DESIGNED BYOTHERS)EXISTINGPARKINGLOTPROPOSED BALDCYPRESS (TYP.)PROPOSEDSAND CORDGRASS (TYP.)FULL FL #1FULLGRAPHIC SCALEEXISTING TREE (TYP.)PROPOSEDACCESS GATEPROPOSEDFUTUREEQUIPMENTLEASE AREA(TYP.)NOTE TO CONTRACTOR:1.ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SOD AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. PLANSECTIONGRAVEL MULCH/TOPSOIL BACKFILLROOTBALL AND TRUNKTREE STABILIZATION ANDFERTILIZATION SYSTEMNOTES:A.FINAL TREE STAKING DETAILS AND PLACEMENT TOBE APPROVED BY OWNER.B.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE AND STRAPS (ANYTHINGTHAT COULD GIRDLE TREE OR RESTRICT ROOTGROWTH) ON UPPER 1/3 OF ROOTBALL.C.PRUNE ALL TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIA-300.2461217389105113X ROOTBALLWIDTH MIN.6"TRUNK/ROOT BALL TO BE CENTERED ANDPLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PIT.16" DIA. CLEAR OF GRAVEL AT TRUNK FLARE.23. 4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED.32" MINIMUM OF GRAVEL LIMESTONE MULCH. MULCHRINGS FOR TREES SHALL BE 5' IN DIAMETER (MIN)OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.INSTALL FILTER FABRIC UNDERNEATH GRAVEL.4TERRA TOGGLE EARTH ANCHOR SYSTEMINSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS.54" MIN. OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHEDGRADE. (SEE GRADING PLAN)6TOP OF ROOTBALL MIN. 1" ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE.7PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED.8ROOTBALLS GREATER THAN 24" DIAMETERSHALL BE PLACED ON MOUND OFUNDISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SETTLING.ROOTBALLS SMALLER THAN 24" INDIAMETER MAY SIT ON COMPACTED EARTH.9UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.10SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTINGPIT.11CUT BACK SLOPE TO PROVIDE A FLATSURFACE FOR PLANTING.12SCALE: N.T.S.TREE PLANTING DETAILL-21SCALE: N.T.S.SHRUB PLANTING DETAILL-22L-2LANDSCAPING DETAILSRANDALL RELO830833615235 COLLIER BLVD.NAPLES, FL 34119COLLIER COUNTYRCMAWD148989064CROWNCASTLERICHARD JOHNSON, PE 4209 Baymeadows Road Jacksonville, Florida 32217 (904) 737-1034 (904) 674-6316 (FAX) www.MartinEnviro.com Full Service Environmental Consultants for Commercial, Industrial, and Telecommunication Industries Due Diligence ◘ Sampling/Testing ◘ NEPA ◘ Ecological Services ◘ Indoor Air Quality ◘ Industrial Hygiene DESKTOP ASTM SCREEN SUMMARY REPORT Crown Castle USA Inc. Date: August 7, 2017 Site Name: Randall BU Number: 815732 Candidate ID: C Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Address: Immokalee Road City/State: Naples, Florida County: Collier (As Provided by the Client) Latitude: 26° 16' 20.4846"N Longitude: 81° 39' 15.2028"W CONCLUSION: Based on available information, no environmental issues have been identified in regards to neighboring sites and/or the subject property itself. Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Desktop ASTM Screen was performed on Business Unit Number 815732 for a candidate site located at Immokalee Road in Naples, Collier County, Florida (Subject Site). This report is a screening tool that identifies sites with potential or existing liabilities. It should be noted that the latitude and longitude provided by the client were utilized to define the Subject Site. The Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process, American Society for Testing and Materials Practice E 1528-14 (ASTM Practice E 1528-14) consists of four (4) major components: a government records search, an historical inquiry, an owner/occupant/user questionnaire, and a site visit for the purpose of making visual and/or physical observations at the Subject Site. The Desktop ASTM Screen only contains the results of the government records search on the target property (Subject Site) and surrounding areas in accordance with the government records search requirements of the ASTM Practice E 1528-14. Martin Environmental Solution Inc (MartinEnviro) obtained a Computerized Environmental Summary Record (CESR) from Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS). The CESR is a summary of selected federal and state environmental databases with the approximate minimum search distance as defined by the ASTM Practice E 1528-14. Selected database results are summarized below. Table 1 – Computerized Environmental Summary Report (CESR) Results Standard ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius Federal – NPL No No Federal – Proposed NPL No No Federal – Deleted NPL No No Federal – SEMS No No Federal – SEMS Archive No No Federal – CERCLIS No No Federal – CERC-NFRAP No No Federal – CERCLIS Liens No Federal – RCRA-CORRACTS No No Federal – RCRA-TSD No No Federal – RCRA-LQG No No Federal – RCRA-SQG No No Federal – RCRA-CESQG No No Federal – RCRA-NonGen No No Federal – Eng No No Federal – Inst No No Federal – ERNS 1982 to 1986 No Federal – ERNS 1987 to 1989 No Federal – ERNS No State – SHWS No No Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 3 Table 1 – Computerized Environmental Summary Report (CESR) Results Standard ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius State – SWF/LF No Yes State – LUST/LAST No No State – UST No No State – AST No Yes State – STCS No Yes State – INST Controls No No State – ENG Controls No No State – VCP No No State – Brownfield Site No No Indian – LUST No No Additional Non-ASTM Records On the Subject Site Within Corresponding Radius Federal – FINDS/FRS No Desktop ASTM Screen Summary MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C – North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District 4 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION SECTION In accordance with Section 5.6 of the ASTM Practice E 1528-14, if one or more affirmative responses are reported in the CESR, as summarized in Table 1, then it must be decided what action, if any, is appropriate. Three (3) affirmative responses were reported in the CESR. Based on available information associated with the positive responses, no environmental concerns have been identified in regards to the Subject Site or neighboring sites that would indicate that these responses pose an immediate environmental concern to the Subject Site. Available information includes current regulatory status as reported in the CESR, the presumed regional topographic gradients, and the location of the facility in relation to the Subject Site. Based on available information, no environmental issues have been identified in regards to the Subject Site and/or neighboring sites. No further action is required at this time. Since a site visit was not included as part of the scope of work at the request of Crown Castle USA Inc., MartinEnviro has relied solely upon the information provided in the CESR to form a conclusion and recommendation. This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Crown Castle USA Inc., its respective subsidiaries, successors, assigns, advisors, affiliates, and lenders. Any rating agency, issuer, purchaser or underwriter of any security collateralized or otherwise backed by the property that is subject to this report or any loans placed on the property may further rely on the report. MartinEnviro also consent to the inclusion of this report in any form, whether in digital or paper format, including any electronic media such as CD-Rom or the internet, in the Prospectus Supplement relating to any securitization transaction, and we consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in such Prospectus Supplement. COMPUTERIZED ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY REPORT Project Property:815732 Randall Cand C Immokalee Road Naples FL 34120 Project No:2017-CCU-0523 Report Type:Database Report - Basic Order No: 20170801039 Requested by:Martin Environmental Solutions Inc. Date Completed: August 2, 2017 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page,this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use,including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.("ERIS")using various sources of information,including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report,and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report.This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate,ERIS disclaims,any and all liability for any errors,omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence,negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom.Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above.This Service and Report(s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc.Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors.The Service,Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................7 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................8 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.........................................................................................................9 Map...............................................................................................................10 Aerial.............................................................................................................13 Topographic Map..........................................................................................14 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................15 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................16 Definitions.....................................................................................................27 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:815732 Randall Cand C Immokalee Road Naples FL 34120 Project No:2017-CCU-0523 Coordinates: Latitude:26.272357 Longitude:-81.654223 UTM Northing:2,906,011.29 UTM Easting:434,677.73 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 17R Elevation:14 FT Order Information: Order No:20170801039 Date Requested:August 1, 2017 Requested by:Martin Environmental Solutions Inc. Report Type:Database Report - Basic Historicals/Products: Executive Summary 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA CESQG-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 State rr-SHWS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DSHW-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-LUST/LAST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST SHWS DSHW SWF/LF LUST/LAST DELISTED LST UST Executive Summary: Report Summary 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-AST-aa Y .25 0 0 1 -- 1 rr-DEL UST AST TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FF TANKS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-STCS-aa Y .5 0 0 1 0 - 1 rr-INST CONTROL-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ENG CONTROLS-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VCP-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWNFIELD SITE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 County rr-BROWARD AST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BROWARD CONTAM-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWARD UST-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HILLS SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-MIAMI CONT-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-MIAMI TANKS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PALM SWF/LF-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 AST DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST CONTROL ENG CONTROLS VCP BROWNFIELD SITE BROWNFIELD AREA INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST BROWARD AST BROWARD CONTAM BROWARD UST HILLS SWF/LF MIAMI CONT MIAMI TANKS PALM SWF/LF FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi .125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PCB-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED DRYC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SPILLS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-DWM CONTAM-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-aa Y .5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UIC-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County rr-ALACHUA RF-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-BROWARD HAZ MAT-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BROWARD NOV-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MIAMI AP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI ENFORCE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI SPILLS-aa Y .125 0 0 --- 0 rr-MIAMI GREASE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI IND WASTE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI WASTE GEN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI MOP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI MRE-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MIAMI SEPTIC-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y .25 0 0 0 -- 0 Total:0 0 2 1 0 3 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. DELISTED FED DRY FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SUPERFUND ROD SSTS PCB PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE UIC ALACHUA RF BROWARD HAZ MAT BROWARD NOV MIAMI AP MIAMI ENFORCE MIAMI SPILLS MIAMI GREASE MIAMI IND WASTE MIAMI WASTE GEN MIAMI MOP MIAMI MRE MIAMI SEPTIC DELISTED COUNTY 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) No records found in the selected databases for the project property. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) m1d AST BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 2 Facility ID: 9700984 Tank Alias | Tank Status | Status Effective Dt: 1 | U - In Service | 01-AUG-97 m1d STCS BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 2 Facility ID | Facility Status: 9700984 | OPEN m2d SWF/LF FOGG'S NURSERY & MULCH SUPPLY, INC. 10270 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL 34120 W 0.47 / 2,471.17 2 1 1 2 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard State SWF/LF - Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills A search of the SWF/LF database, dated Jan 31, 2017 has found that there are 1 SWF/LF site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key FOGG'S NURSERY & MULCH SUPPLY, INC. 10270 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES FL 34120 W 0.47 / 2,471.17 2 AST - Aboveground Storage Tanks A search of the AST database, dated May 1, 2017 has found that there are 1 AST site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 1 Facility ID: 9700984 Tank Alias | Tank Status | Status Effective Dt: 1 | U - In Service | 01-AUG-97 STCS - Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search A search of the STCS database, dated May 29, 2017 has found that there are 1 STCS site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BONITA BAY EAST GOLF COURSE 2700 WILDWOOD BLVD NAPLES FL 34120 NNE 0.15 / 806.12 1 Facility ID | Facility Status: 9700984 | OPEN Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source #* #* ^_ m2c m1c(2) 81°38'30"W81°39'W81°39'30"W81°40'W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N26°15'30"N26°15'30"N0.25 0 0.250.12 5 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 1 Mile Radius 1:18200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 2 1 (2) #* #* ^_ m2c m1c(2) I m m o k a l e e R d Krape RdRivers RdRichards RdC a n n o n B l v dPipers RdWildwood BlvdSmokehouse Bay DrS u n d a n c e S t B i s c a yne BayLn Calusa Pines Dr Richards StD r a g o n L n R a m s eySt81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 0.5 Mile Radius 1:9100 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 2 1 (2) #* ^_ m1c(2) I m m o k a l e e R d Krape RdRichards RdPipers RdWildwood BlvdSmokehouse Bay Dr81°39'W81°3 9'30"W 26°16'30"N26°16'30"N0.07 0 0.070.035 Miles Order No: 20170 801039 Map : 0.25 M ile Radius 1:4600 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 3412 0 Source: © 2 016 ESRI © ERIS Information Inc. ^_Project Prop erty Buf fer Outlin e #*Eris Sites with Higher Elevation ")Eris Sites with Same Elevation #*Eris Sites with Lower Elevation (Eris Sites with Unk nown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ram ps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State B oundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land Historic Fill 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone FWS Special Designation A reas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield A reas State Superfund A reas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund A reas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/adm inistered areas) 1 (2) ^_ Source: Esri, DigitalGlo be, GeoEye, Earthstar G eographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroG RID, IG N, and the GIS User C ommunity 81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order No: 20170801039Aerial 1:12200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 34120 © ERIS In formation Inc.Source: ESRI Wo rld Ima gery ^_ 81°39'W81°39'30"W 26°17'N26°17'N26°16'30"N26°16'30"N26°16'N26°16'N0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles Order No: 20170801039Topographic Map 1:12200 Address: Immokalee Road, Naples, FL, 34120 © ERIS In formation Inc.Source: USGS Topo gra phic Map 15 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID Unplottable Summary 16 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Jun 9, 2017 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Apr 5, 2017 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Apr 5, 2017 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS Appendix: Database Descriptions 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA CESQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2016 CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA CESQG RCRA NON GEN 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2016 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 3, 2017 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 6, 2016 State Florida's State-Funded Action Sites:rr-SHWS-bb This list contains hazardous waste sites that are part of various federal and state funded cleanup programs. Florida's State-Funded Action Sites is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Jun 5, 2017 Delisted State-Funded Action Sites:rr-DSHW-bb This database contains a list of closed hazardous waste sites of various federal and state funded cleanup programs that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jun 5, 2017 FED ENG FED INST ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST SHWS DSHW 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills:rr-SWF/LF-bb The Solid Waste Facility Inventory Report made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) includes all types of authorized and unauthorized facilities: municipal solid waste, landfills, dumps, construction and demolition disposal, recycling facilities, and more. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2017 Leaking Tanks:rr-LUST/LAST-bb The Storage Tank Regulation Section is part of the Petroleum Restoration Program in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)s Division of Waste Management. In 1983, Florida was one of the first states in the union to pass legislation and adopt rules for underground and aboveground storage tank systems. Since then, over 28,000 facilities have reported discharges of petroleum products from storage tank systems. Florida relies on groundwater for about 92 percent of its drinking water needs, and has some of the most stringent rules in the country. Government Publication Date: Jun 12, 2017 Delisted Leaking Tanks:rr-DELISTED LST-bb Whereas Leaking Tanks (LST) includes only facilities which currently have contamination as recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, this list contains facilities which were once included in LST data but no longer appear on the list made available by FDEP. Facilities may be removed from the current LST list because the discharge has been cleaned up, or the discharge is not required for 62-770. Government Publication Date: Jun 12, 2017 Underground Storage Tanks:rr-UST-bb List of underground storage tank locations made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). In an effort to minimize the occurrence and environmental risks of releases and discharges, FDEP administers standards pertaining to the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of underground storage tank systems that store regulated substances. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2017 Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-AST-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) provides standards for aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that have individual storage tank capacities greater than 550 gallons. The state also regulates the registration, construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, closure, and disposal of storage tank systems that store regulated substances. The listing of regulated aboveground storage tank facilities is maintained by FDEP. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2017 Delisted AST UST Storage Tanks:rr-DEL UST AST TANK-bb This database contains a list of closed UST and AST storage tank sites that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Jul 2, 2015 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DEL STORAGE TANK-bb This database contains a list of closed storage tank sites that were removed from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) storage tank database. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2017 Federal Facilities Listing:rr-FF TANKS-bb The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Storage Tank Program registers facilities and storage tanks where aboveground or underground storage tanks store pollutants, hazardous substances, and/or mineral acid substances regulated by Chapter 62-761, Florida Administrative Code, or when aboveground storage tanks or compression vessels store a hazardous substance which requires registration according to Chapter 376, Florida Statutes. Government Publication Date: Jun 22, 2017 Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search:rr-STCS-bb List of facilities and tanks in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Storage Tank/Contaminated Facility Search which do not currently have active, regulated underground or aboveground storage tanks (USTs or ASTs) containing petroleum. Note that tank details do not appear for facilities for which all tanks have been removed. Government Publication Date: May 29, 2017 Institutional Controls Registry:rr-INST CONTROL-bb The Institutional Controls registry is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The registry aims to help preserve adequate protection of contaminated soil regions and help to minimize any chances of exposure. Government Publication Date: Jan 24, 2017 SWF/LF LUST/LAST DELISTED LST UST AST DEL UST AST TANK DEL STORAGE TANK FF TANKS STCS INST CONTROL 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Engineering Controls:rr-ENG CONTROLS-bb A listing of all engineering controls that are in place to eliminate or reduce the potential for contaminant migration and exposure to contaminants. These controls may include caps, barriers, guards or fences. The list is maintained by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jan 24, 2017 Voluntary Cleanup Sites:rr-VCP-bb A listing of active and closed voluntary cleanup sites registered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2017 Brownfield Sites:rr-BROWNFIELD SITE-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of sites within designated Brownfield Areas within Florida where Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA)s have been executed between FDEP and a responsible party. Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2017 Brownfield Areas:rr-BROWNFIELD AREA-bb Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. This is a list of Brownfield Areas, defined by the FDEP as contiguous areas of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that have been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. Because a variety of sources and methods were used to derive information for this data, locations are approximate. Government Publication Date: Jun 19, 2017 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Land:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 4, which includes Florida. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb Listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 4, which includes Florida. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 07, 2016 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Nov 14, 2016 County Broward County Aboveground Storage Tanks:rr-BROWARD AST-bb List of known regulated aboveground storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed. The list is maintained by Broward County Government. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Broward County Inventory Report on Contaminated Locations:rr-BROWARD CONTAM-bb The Inventory Report of Contaminated Locations has been prepared by the Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department to monitor known contaminated locations within Broward County, Florida. This report includes sites listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and sites licensed for contamination assessment and cleanup by the Pollution Prevention, Remediation and Air Quality Division of the Department. Government Publication Date: Nov 4, 2016 ENG CONTROLS VCP BROWNFIELD SITE BROWNFIELD AREA INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST BROWARD AST BROWARD CONTAM 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Broward County Underground Storage Tanks:rr-BROWARD UST-bb List of all known regulated underground storage tanks within Broward County, including those tanks that have been closed. The list is maintained by Broward County Government. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Hillsborough County Landfills:rr-HILLS SWF/LF-bb List of Landfill sites in Hillsborough County regulated by Hillsborough County Government in Florida. Landfills or solid waste disposal units are classified according to the amount and types of waste received. Rule 62-701.340(3), F.A.C. classifies landfills in Florida as Class I, Class II, Class I and Class II, and Class III. Class I landfills are those which receive an average of 20 tons or more of solid waste per day. Class II landfills are those which receive an average of less than 20 tons of solid waste per day. Class I and Class II landfills receive general, non-hazardous household, commercial, industrial, and agricultural wastes, subject to the restrictions of Rules 62-701.300 and 62-701.520, F.A.C. Government Publication Date: Mar 6, 2017 Miami-Dade County Contaminated Sites:rr-MIAMI CONT-bb The Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) maintains a list of Contaminated Sites in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2017 Miami-Dade County Storage Tanks:rr-MIAMI TANKS-bb A listing of Underground and Aboveground Storage Tank sites in Miami-Dade County, as recorded by the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) Storage Tanks Program. The program conducts annual inspections to verify that facility owners are complying with the necessary requirements that have been set up to prevent any discharges into the groundwater of Miami-Dade County. In addition to compliance inspections, the Storage Tanks program oversees removal and installation of new underground and aboveground storage systems to verify that these are conducted in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. Government Publication Date: Apr 24, 2017 Palm Beach County Solid Waste Facilities:rr-PALM SWF/LF-bb Inventory of solid waste facility sites in Palm Beach County. A solid waste site is defined as any parcel of land upon which or in which solid waste has either been processed, transferred, or placed for disposal. These sites include dumps, landfills, solid waste management facilities, waste transfer stations, selected hazardous waste spill or burial sites, and wastewater sludge land application sites. The inventory is maintained by Solid Waste Authority Palm Beach County. Government Publication Date: Apr 1, 2016 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2017 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: 1987-2015 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2017 BROWARD UST HILLS SWF/LF MIAMI CONT MIAMI TANKS PALM SWF/LF FINDS/FRS TRIS HMIRS 22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: May 4, 2017 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA of the Act) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified ongressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2014 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Nov 12, 2013 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb NCDL ODI IODI TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER 23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: Nov 18, 2016 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2016 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: Nov 22, 2016 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: Sep 13, 2016 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017 Alternative Fueling Stations:rr-ALT FUELS-bb List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2017 Superfund Decision Documents:rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS MLTS HIST MLTS MINES ALT FUELS SUPERFUND ROD 24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Government Publication Date: Mar 22, 2017 Registered Pesticide Establishments:rr-SSTS-bb List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2017 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers:rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2017 State Priority Ranking List:rr-PRIORITYCLEAN-bb The Florida Legislature has established a state-funded program to cleanup properties that are contaminated as a result of the operations of a drycleaning facility or wholesale supply facility (Chapter 376, Florida Statutes). The program is administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The statute was sponsored by the drycleaning industry to address environmental, economic, and liability issues resulting from drycleaning solvent contamination. The program provides limited liability protection to the owner, operator and real property owner of drycleaning or wholesale supply facilities for cleanup of drycleaning solvent contamination if the parties meet the eligibility conditions stated in the law. Government Publication Date: Jul 10, 2017 Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb A listing of dry cleaning facilities registered with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The information contains facility identification number, site location information, related party (owner) information, and facility type and status. Data is taken from the Storage Tank & Contamination Monitoring database, the registration repository of dry cleaner facility data. Government Publication Date: Mar 2, 2017 Delisted Dry Cleaning Facilities:rr-DELISTED DRYC-bb List of sites removed from the drycleaners database made available by the Florida Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Government Publication Date: Mar 2, 2017 Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents:rr-SPILLS-bb Statewide listing of oil and hazardous materials spills and incidents recorded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Government Publication Date: Jul 6, 2017 Contaminated Sites:rr-DWM CONTAM-bb Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM) listing of active or known sites that include sites requiring cleanup but are not actively being worked on due to the agency's lack of funding (primarily petroleum and drycleaning). Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2017 Delisted Contaminated Sites:rr-DEL CONTAM SITE-bb List of sites which were once included on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management (DWM)'s Contaminated Sites list. As sites on the Contaminated Sites (CS) list are cleaned up or closed under risk based corrective action, they are removed from the CS list. Government Publication Date: Sep 30, 2015 Underground Injection Control Wells:rr-UIC-bb Class I Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells that are currently or were previously active, as well as proposed sites, regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Class I UIC wells are used to inject nonhazardous waste, hazardous waste (new hazardous waste wells were banned in 1983), or municipal waste below the lowermost underground source of drinking water. Government Publication Date: May 24, 2017 SSTS PCB PRIORITYCLEAN DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYC SPILLS DWM CONTAM DEL CONTAM SITE UIC 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County Alachua County Regulated Facility List:rr-ALACHUA RF-bb List of facilities regulated by the Environmental Protection Department under the Alachua County Hazardous Materials Management Code (HMMC). The HMMC regulates the management of hazardous materials to prevent discharges to the environment and provide uniform standards for the proper storage, handling and monitoring hazardous materials in the county. Government Publication Date: May 8, 2017 Broward County Hazardous Material Sites:rr-BROWARD HAZ MAT-bb The Pollution Prevention Division of Broward County tracks sites that store hazardous materials. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Broward County Notice of Violation Sites:rr-BROWARD NOV-bb A list of Notice of Violation Sites issued by the Community Code Compliance Section of the Planning and Redevelopment Division of Broward County. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 Miami-Dade County Air Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI AP-bb List of facilities which have applied for a Miami-Dade County Air Operating Permit. Permits are required for any air pollution source subsequent to construction or modification of the facility, and after demonstrating compliance with the terms and condition of the county air construction permit. Facilities with the potential to emit the following air pollutants may require a County operating permit: Particulate Matter (PM), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Lead, and Hazardous Air pollutants (HAPs). Depending on the type of facility and the amount of air emissions, the State of Florida may require a facility permit. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Enforcement Case Tracking System Sites:rr-MIAMI ENFORCE-bb Enforcement cases supervised by the Department of Environmental Resources Management in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Fuel Spill Cases:rr-MIAMI SPILLS-bb The Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) documents fuel spill sites that are not administered by a state program. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2017 Miami-Dade County Grease Trap Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI GREASE-bb Any non-residential facilities that prepare or process food, discharge or have the potential to discharge oil and grease to the public sanitary sewer system, require a Grease Discharge Operating (GDO) Permit. These permits are granted by the Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) of Miami-Dade's Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Industrial Waste Permit Sites:rr-MIAMI IND WASTE-bb List of permits used to regulate facilities that store, handle, use or generate hazardous materials or hazardous waste throughout Miami-Dade County. The permit provides operating conditions and requirements as well as guidance for the operators. Government Publication Date: May 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Industrial Waste Small Quantity Generators:rr-MIAMI WASTE GEN-bb A listing of Industrial Waste Small Quantity Generator sites in Miami-Dade County, as recorded by the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County Marine Facilities Operating Permit:rr-MIAMI MOP-bb ALACHUA RF BROWARD HAZ MAT BROWARD NOV MIAMI AP MIAMI ENFORCE MIAMI SPILLS MIAMI GREASE MIAMI IND WASTE MIAMI WASTE GEN MIAMI MOP 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 Miami-Dade County Ordinance 89-104 and Section 24-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County require the following types of marine facilities to obtain annual operating permits from the Miami-Dade County Department of Environment Resources Management: recreational boat docking facilities with 10 or more boat slips, moorings, davit spaces, and vessel tie-up spaces; boat storage facilities contiguous to tidal waters in Miami-Dade County with 10 or more dry storage spaces (including boatyards and boat manufacturing facilities); and commercial boat docking facilities, regardless of the number of slips - this includes the Port of Miami, Terminal Island and shipping terminals on the Miami River. Miami-Dade County is governed by the Public Records Act Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. These records made available by the Regulatory and Economic Resources Department. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Miami-Dade County River Enforcement:rr-MIAMI MRE-bb List of enforcement cases for sites on or near the Miami River regulated by the Miami-Dade County Government, Florida. The list has all environmental information on said property coordinated and compiled by the Enforcement Section. Government Publication Date: Nov 19, 2013 Miami-Dade County Septic Tanks in Wellfields:rr-MIAMI SEPTIC-bb The Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) maintains a list of septic tanks in wellfields in Miami-Dade County. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2017 Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Jun 6, 2017 MIAMI MRE MIAMI SEPTIC DELISTED COUNTY 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20170801039 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source,information available,time coverage,and acronyms used.They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record.Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points,not necessarily the distance between the sites'boundaries.All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted.All values are an approximation. Source:Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'-This section lists all the records which fall on the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties,listing them in order of proximity from the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report'section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property.Map Key numbers always start at #1.The project property will always have a map key of '1'if records are available.If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property.If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation':the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation',the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons,including limited geographic information.These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. Definitions General Environmental Issues and Consulting Phase I Assessments Phase II Assessments Soil and Groundwater Sampling and Testing Emergency Response and Source Removal Contaminated Site Assessment and Remediation Hazardous Waste Management NEPA Screening NEPA Environmental Assessments Section 106 Reviews Ecological Studies OSHA and EPA Compliance OSHA/Health & Safety Training Industrial Hygiene 4209 Baymeadows Road Jacksonville, Florida 32217 (904) 737-1034 (904) 674-6316 (FAX) www.MartinEnviro.com August 7, 2017 Ms. Julie Aker C/o Crown Castle USA Inc. 3 Corporate Park Drive Suite 101 Clifton Park, New York 12065 Re: Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist Business Unit Number: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate ID: C Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Immokalee Road Naples, Collier County, Florida 26° 16' 20.4846"N and 81° 39' 15.2028"W Dear Ms. Aker: Martin Environmental Solutions Inc (MartinEnviro) has completed a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Desktop National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Screening Checklist for the above-referenced property (Subject Site). It is the understanding of MartinEnviro that Crown Castle USA Inc. is reviewing two (2) candidate locations for the construction of a telecommunications facility that will include an approximately 250-foot tower (260 feet with appurtenances) to be located in Naples, Collier County, Florida. The purpose of an FCC NEPA Screening is to identify conditions as indicated in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, rule Sections 1.1307 (47 CFR 1.1307) that would indicate the need to perform a NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA). This Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the resources and conditions defined in 47 CFR 1.1307. MartinEnviro reviewed information from available historical and regulatory records and wetland and floodplain maps. The results of the review are summarized below: Summary of Reviews Information Database On Subject Site Within 0.5-mile Radius Historic Sites No No Natural Areas No No Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 BU#: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C - North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Summary of Reviews Information Database On Subject Site Within 0.5-mile Radius Scenic Rivers No No Scenic Trails No No Floodplains Yes Yes Wetlands Yes Yes Based on the following factors, MartinEnviro has concluded that this Undertaking requires the preparation of an EA. • The proposed candidate site is located in flood zone AH. Zone AH is defined as areas with a 1% annual chance of shallow flooding, usually in the form of a pond, with an average depth ranging from one (1) to three (3) feet (within the 100-year floodplain). • The proposed candidate site is located within a wetland designated PFO2Cd. PFO2Cd is defined as Palustrine, Forested, Needle-Leaved deciduous, Seasonally Flooded, Partially Drained/Ditched. A review of historic resources provided through the National Register of Historic Properties (NRHP) file database service indicated that no historic properties were identified within a 0.5- mile or a 0.75-mile radius of the proposed location; however, a cultural resources survey and consultation with SHPO are still required. Please note that the file database service does not provide archaeological data and that archaeological resources also should be evaluated. Indian religious sites are not included; thus, consultation with Native American tribal organizations via the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) is also required. The assessment revealed two (2) conditions that require the preparation of an EA. MartinEnviro appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Crown Castle USA Inc. Please contact Sherrie Leman at (904) 737-1034 should you have questions pertaining to the information presented within this review. Thad Nicholls NEPA Specialist I Sherrie Leman Senior Vice President Desktop FCC NEPA Screening Checklist MartinEnviro Project Number: 2017-CCU-0523 BU#: 815732 Site Name: Randall Candidate: C - North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. Site Location Map and Aerial Photograph B. Historic Resources Map C. Critical Habitat Map D. Wildlife Refuge Information E. Wilderness Area and Wild and Scenic River Maps F. Scenic Trails G. Floodplain Map H. Wetland Map I. Statement of Qualifications This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Crown Castle USA Inc., its respective subsidiaries, successors, assigns, advisors, affiliates, and lenders. Any rating agency, issuer, purchaser or underwriter of any security collateralized or otherwise backed by the property that is the subject of this report or any loans placed upon the property may further rely upon the report. We also consent to the inclusion of this report in any form, whether in paper or digital format, including any electronic media such as CD-ROM or the internet, in the Prospectus Supplement relating to any securitization transaction, and we consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in such Prospectus Supplement. Desktop NEPA Land Use Screening Checklist Site Type: Raw land Collocation Replacement Tower Acquisition BU Number: 815732 Site Address: Immokalee Road Site Name: Randall Naples, Florida Candidate ID: C County: Collier Candidate Name: North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Latitude: 26° 16' 20.4846"N MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Longitude: 81° 39' 15.2028"W FCC NEPA Category Information Source Conclusion Positive Negative (1) Wilderness Area National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2) Wildlife Preserve U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (3) Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (4) Historic Places Consultation with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is required to determine whether the replacement tower will have an effect on historical resources and archaeological resources require assessment (5) Indian Religious Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) required to determine what American Indian Tribal consultation is required (6) Floodplain Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (7) Wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) (8) High Intensity White Lights The client has provided no information to indicate that the replacement tower will be equipped with high intensity white lights in a residential neighborhood. (9) Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation Exposure The client is responsible for the evaluation of the project to ensure compliance with applicable RF Standards. If screening investigation for any of the above categories results in a POSITIVE screening, an Environmental Assessment (EA) must be prepared and filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Construction may not start on any positively screened site requiring an EA prior to the receipt of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) from the FCC. The undersigned has reviewed and approved completion of the NEPA Checklist for the above-referenced site. Prepared By: Print Name: Thad Nicholls Title: NEPA Specialist I Date: August 7, 2017 This checklist is only a summary of the findings and should be reviewed in conjunction with the NEPA Screening Report ATTACHMENT A SITE LOCATION MAP AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Location Map Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Aerial Photograph ATTACHMENT B HISTORIC RESOURCES MAP Historic Properties Map Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-00523 0.5-mile Radius Historic Properties Map Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-00523 0.75-mile Radius ATTACHMENT C CRITICAL HABITAT MAP Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Critical Habitat ATTACHMENT D WILDLIFE REFUGE INFORMATION 8/2/2017 Zip Code Locator, National Wildlife Refuge System https://www.fws.gov/refuges/zipCodeLocator/index.cfm 1/2 National Wildlife Refuge System Find a Refuge by Zip Code Zip Code:34120 Distance:within 50 miles Refuges Near 34120 (within 50 miles) Refuge Address Distance Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Immokalee, FL 34142 18.86 miles Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge Immokalee, FL 34142 18.86 miles J.N. "Ding" Darling National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Caloosahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Island Bay National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Matlacha Pass National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles Pine Island National Wildlife Refuge Sanibel, FL 33957 33.95 miles NWRS Home About Land Planning Visitors Wildlife & Habitat Management Policies & Budget You Can Help 8/2/2017 Zip Code Locator, National Wildlife Refuge System https://www.fws.gov/refuges/zipCodeLocator/index.cfm 2/2 Last updated: November 23, 2012 ATTACHMENT E WILDERNESS AREA AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MAPS 00.510.25 Miles Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 National Wild and Scenic Rivers and Wilderness Areas ATTACHMENT F SCENIC TRAILS Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Scenic Trails ATTACHMENT G FLOODPLAIN MAP Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Floodplain Map ATTACHMENT H WETLAND MAP National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map Legend: Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Pond Estuarine and Marine Wetland Lake Freshwater Emergent Wetland Other Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Ravine Site Name: Randall (Candidate C) Client #: 815732 MartinEnviro #: 2017-CCU-0523 Wetland Map ATTACHMENT I STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS THADDEUS NICHOLLS Field Scientist, NEPA Specialist Fields of Specialization Mr. Nicholls has over 10 years experience in the field of environmental consulting, including performing biological surveys, field data collection and analysis, and wildlife monitoring. His specific skills are within the realm of coastal and coral reef ecology, and Living Shoreline habitat restoration and enhancement practices. Experience Mr. Nicholls has significant experience monitoring various endangered and protected wildlife species such as bald eagles, golden eagles, Swainson’s hawk, red-tailed hawk, osprey, and live-trapping/ handling of the endangered species the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse. He has a great deal of experience collecting field data, including underwater data collection using SCUBA and underwater photography. Mr. Nicholls' skills also include performing various parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses on collected field data. His Living Shoreline work involved habitat restoration and enhancement of eastern oyster (Crassotrea virginica) and Spartina alterniflora tidal grass habitats. In addition to performing field work, Mr. Nicholls also writes and prepares materials required for SHPO submissions and NEPA reports, and performs numerous Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Certifications and Affiliations • NPDES Sediment and Erosion Control Certification • Asbestos Building Inspector Certification • Lead-Based Paint Inspector Certification • HAZWOPER Certification (40-hour) • ACOE Wetland Delineation Training Program • Member, International Society for Reef Studies Education B.Sc. Environmental Science with emphasis in Ecology Wheaton College (IL) M.Sc. Geology with emphasis in Coral Reef Ecology Utah State Unversity SHERRIE LEMAN Project Manager / Senior Vice President Fields of Specialization Ms. Leman has over 25 years of diversified experience in the environmental field, including, but not limited to, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews, subsurface investigations, regulatory compliance and permitting (air quality, wetlands, generators, and tanks), hazardous waste management, environmental microbiology studies, bio-remediation studies and implementation plans, environmental health risk assessment and management, indoor air quality studies, industrial hygiene, radon studies, lead-based paint studies, asbestos identification and remediation/abatement, quality assurance/ quality control procedures, and sample collection and analysis of water, wastewater, soils, and air. She also has provided testimony as an expert witness in environmental contamination cases. Ms. Leman specializes in telecommunications facilities at this time. Experience Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Leman was responsible for regulatory compliance with applicable environmental regulations for a national company within the telecommunications industry. She has significant experience in conducting and managing Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA projects for national companies, as well as the implementation of SARA Tier I and Tier II reporting, hazardous waste management, and hazardous substance storage programs. Ms. Leman also has expertise in the development and implementation of various environmental and health and safety policy, procedure, and training programs for national firms, embracing applicable environmental and OSHA regulations. She has significant experience in conducting and managing environmental and health and safety audits in commercial and industrial settings, as well as root cause analysis and corrective action studies. Certifications and Affiliations • ASTM Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Correction Action Education B.S. Microbiology / Public Health Science with emphasis in Chemistry South Dakota State University Graduate studies in Environmental Public Health with emphasis in Environmental Engineering University of South Florida Re: Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. Sincerely, Located in Collier Co., FL: 830336 Randall Relo MFP Project #: 23518-544 / TAPP Project Number: TP-17724 May 8, 2019 Crown Castle Proposed 195-ft Monopole Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. 18301 State Route 161, Plain City, Ohio 43064 (614) 398-6250 - mike@mfpeng.com I understand that there may be some concern on the part of local building officials regarding the potential for failure of the proposed communication monopole. Communication structures are designed in accordance with the Telecommunications Industry Association ANSI/TIA-222-G, "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures". This Structure is to be fabricated by TransAmerican Power Products I have designed this monopole to withstand a 3-sec. gusted wind speed of 159 mph (Vult) as recommended by ANSI/TIA-222-G for Collier Co., FL. The design also conforms to the requirements of the 2017 Florida Building Code. This monopole has been designed to accommodate a theoretical fall radius. The upper 58' of the pole has been designed to meet the wind loads of the design, however, the lower portion of the pole has been designed with a minimum 10% extra capacity. Assuming the pole has been designed according to my design, and well maintained, in the event of a failure due to extreme wind and comparable appurtenance antenna load (winds in excess of the design wind load), it would yield/buckle at the 137' elevation. The yielded section would result in a maximum 58' fall radius, but would most likely remain connected and hang from the standing section. The structure has been designed with all of the applicable factors as required by the code. A properly designed, constructed and maintained pole has never collapsed; monopoles are safe structures with a long history of reliable operation. I hope this review of the monopole design has given you a greater degree of comfort regarding the design capacity inherent in pole structures. If you have any additional questions please call me at 614-398-6250 or email mike@mfpeng.com. Michael F. Plahovinsak, P.E. Sole Proprietor - Independent Engineer P.E. Licensed in 48 Jurisdictions 1         6NC1028E  Naples Immokalee Road   Crown Monopole  Wireless Telecommunication Facility      Radio Frequency (RF) Coverage Analysis          Last Updated  01/29/2019 Revision Number V0.1   RF Engineering Review Page 2 1/29/2019 Table of Contents  Current Coverage and Coverage Change Due to Tower Decommissioning  .......................................................................................... 3 Coverage Footprint:  Local Population and Emergency Calls  ................................................................................................................ 4               RF Engineering Review Page 3 1/29/2019 Current Coverage and Coverage Change Due to Tower Decommissioning                                                                                                                                     Figure 1: Existing Service In 2001, T‐Mobile launched 2G service (as Voicestream) at  the Crown monopole tower located at the intersection of Immokalee  Rd and Bellaire Bay Dr in Naples. The antennas on this one‐hundred‐ ninety‐foot tower were mounted at one‐hundred‐eighty‐one feet and  provided a roughly contiguous three‐hundred‐sixty‐degree coverage  footprint for a 2‐3 mile radius. Since that time, there have been  various technology upgrades including ongoing enhancements to 3G  and 4G deployments.  Today the service footprint for this facility covers the  residential communities to the north and south as well as acting as a  transition or handover site for users traveling east to west along  Immokalee Rd. In particular, the entire communities of The Quarry,  Heritage Bay and Esplanade would have little to no usable signal levels  without this facility broadcasting cellular service. In figure one, signal  levels are represented by the shaded magenta areas around the cell  towers. (green dots) Darker colors represent better signal levels. In  areas of dark magenta, a user would have relatively good quality  signal levels. The ability to make and receive calls or stream data  indoors is better guaranteed. Areas with lighter shades of magenta  indicate service levels that may not support all services indoors or  during network busy hours. The lightest shaded areas would have   Figure 2: Service without Crown Tower poor service with the worst‐case scenario being where a user could  not place a call at all.   In figure two, a propagation map shows the predicted  service levels without the T‐Mobile facility located at the Crown tower  in operation. Whereas most of the residential neighborhoods to the  north had good coverage before, service has dropped to “fair” levels  for the entire area. To the west in the Esplanade community, service  levels have dropped from fair to poor, the consequences of which  include the possibility that home owners may no longer be able to use  their phones inside their house. In addition, Immokalee RD would  have compromised service levels from approximately Rose Blvd in the  west to Rock Rd in the east.    RF Engineering Review Page 4 1/29/2019    Coverage Footprint:  Local Population and Emergency Calls                                                                                            * ‐ In the event a user places an emergency call in an area where their own provider does not have usable service levels, the phone will automatically be connected to any other provider with  strong enough cellular service levels  The impact of decommissioning an active cell tower in a community can be better understood by looking at one of the most critical  aspects of cell phone use: the ability to contact emergency services. In the above propagation maps, the general service levels are shown as  a green shade. The coverage footprint for the T‐Mobile facility at the Crown tower is indicated by the darker green area. This service  envelope, an approximately 12 square mile area covers close to ten‐thousand residents. (based on the last available 2010 census data, it is  most likely this number is higher due to the more recent, extensive development in the area) In figure three, the coverage footprint is  superimposed against the population data while in figure four the locations of E911 calls over a thirty‐day period within the coverage  footprint are mapped. Within the service area of the T‐Mobile facility at the Crown tower there were fifty‐one emergency calls placed  between December twenty‐three of last year to January twenty‐three of this year. One of these calls lasted for over thirteen minutes. With  an estimated seventy percent of E911 calls being placed from wireless phones, the requirement for robust, uninterrupted cell phone service  becomes more critical than before. The decommissioning of this facility without a replacement could potentially jeopardize public safety due  to a lack of wireless services. *    Figure 3: Coverage Footprint and Population Figure 4: Coverage Footprint and E911 calls (12/23/18‐ 01/23/19)  E911  ORDINANCE NO 020 7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8627N AND BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PUD TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS RICHLAND PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IMMOKALEE ROAD CR 846 AND COLLIER BOULEVARD CR 951 IN SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 150 ACRES PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 9727 THE FORMER RICHLAND PUD AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS Karen Bishop of PMS Inc of Naples representing Kenco Development Inc petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida SECTION ONE The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East Collier County Florida is changed from PUD to PUD Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit A which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 8627N as described in Ordinance Number 91102 the Collier County Land Development Code are hereby amended accordingly SECTION TWO Ordinance Number 9727 known as the Richland PUD adopted on June 10 1997 by the Board of County Commissioners of C611ier County is hereby repealed in its entirety SECTION THREE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State PASSED AND D ULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida thisa day of GHTERK Clerk Att 1 pprovea as to Fo d Legal Sufficiency MarjorOVl Student Assistant County Attorney PUDA2001 A R 1494CBlo 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA JAMES N COLETTA Chairman This ordinance filed with te Secrqtary of totes Office the ay and acknowledgemnt of at filin received sof PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR RICHLAND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY Prepared by PMS Inc of Naples 2335 Tamiami Trail N ff408 Naples Florida 34103 Date Reviewed by CCPC Date Approved by BCC Ordinance Number Ordinance Number Document Date 11702212o2 200207 12402 Exibit TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV SECTION V SECTION VI Legal Description Property Ownership and General Description Project Development Residential District Community Commercial District Reserve District General Development Commitments 11 21 31 41 51 61 LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B TABLE 1 PUD Master Plan Conceptual Buffer Plan Development Standards for R Residential Areas STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of Kenco Development Inc hereinaf ter referred to as the Developer to create a Planned Unit Development PUD on 150 acres of land located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East Collier CountyFloridaThenameofthisPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallbeRichlandThedevelopmentofRichlandwillbeincompliancewiththeplanninggoalsandobjectivesofCollierCounty as set forth in the Growth Management Plan The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Future Land Use Element and map of the Growth Management Plan and other applicable regulationsforthefollowingreasons The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use DistrictUrban Residential Sub district and the Activity Center Mixed Use DistrictActivity Center Subdistrict as iden tified on the Future Land Use Map as required in Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element FLUE The proposed density of Richland is 31 dwelling units per acre which is less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System and is therefore consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 51 The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of four dwelling units per acre Certain parts of the subject property lie within a one mile radius of an activity center qualifying the area for an additional 3 dwelling units per acre while an additional dwelling unit per acre is available because the project fronts on two arterial streets Richland is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surroundinglandusesasrequiredinPolicy54oftheFutureLandUseElement Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element The development of Richland will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 31 H and L of the Future Land Use Element Richland is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management inaccor dance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective15oftheDrainageSubElementofthePublicFacilitiesElement The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approvedbytheCounty o The subject property includes an Activity Center Designation which is a preferred location for commercial and mixeduse developments The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the RICHLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE iii SECTION 1 11 12 13 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNERSHIP and GENERAL DESCRIPTION PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of Richland and to describe the existing condition of the property to be developed LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northeast 14 of Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East less the East and North 100 feet for the purpose of road rightofway located in Collier CountyFlorida TITLE TO PROPERTY The Property is currently under the ownership of Kenco Development Inc 8610 Pebblebrooke Drive Naples Florida 34119 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The project site is located in Section 27 Township 48 South Range 26 East and is bordered on the north by Immokalee Road CR846 on the east byCR951onthesouthbyOakridgeMiddleSchoolandonthewestby undeveloped agricultural land and Laurel Oak Elementary School The zoning classification of the subject property as of this submittal is PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The sites vegetation includes pine flatwoods saw palmetto slash pine and sabal palm It also contains areas of cypress fern and sawgrass Soils on the site are Immokalee fine sand and Arzell fine sand A small area of pompano fine sand is located in the southeast corner of the site Do The surrounding area is generally undeveloped and is located within the Activity Center Designation and Residential Density Band of the Future Land Use Map to the Growth Management Plan Elevations in the area range from 130 150 feet according to USGS quadrangle maps The site is outside of the flood plane and requiresdevelopmenttobesited18inchesabovethecrownoftheroadaccording to flood insurance rate maps 11 15 PROJECT DENSITY Ao The total acreage of Richland is approximately 150 acres The maximum number of dwelling units to be built on the total acreage is 400Thenumberofdwellingunitspergrossresidentialacreisapproximately31 units The density on individual parcels of land throughout the project may varyaccordingtothetypeofhousingplacedoneachparcelofland Commercial uses occupy approximately 23 acres These described land uses are set forth on the PUD Master Plan Exhibit A At all times property included within the Richland PUD shall be included in determining project density including property reserved or dedicated for public uses such as but not limited to public roadways easements reserves and landscape buffers 12 SECTION II 21 22 PURPOSE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for Richland and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances policies and procedures GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES Bo Richland a private community will include a broad range of Singlefamily Multifamily Community Commercial HotelMotel Stormwater Management Open Space and Reserve areas Each singlefamily multifamily and commercial parcel will be served with publicly provided utilities including potable water sewer and electricity Amenities proposed to be provided in the project include but are not limited to structures designed to provide social and recreational space lakes natural and landscaped open spaces The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit A A land use summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan The location size and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat Approval in accordance with Article 3 Division 32 Section 329 of the Collier County Land Development Code 23 GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES Regulations for development of Richland shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD ordinance and Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat Final Site Development Plan and Excavation Permit Where this PUD ordinance fails to provide developmental standards then the provisions of the most similar zoning district or section of the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply 21 24 Bo Unless otherwise defined herein the definitions of all terms shall bethesameasthedefinitionssetforthintheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeineffectatthetimeofdevelopmentorderapplication Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to a concurrency review under the Adequate Public Facilities OrdinanceArticle3Division315oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode Unless modified waived or excepted by this PUD or by subsequentrequeststheprovisionsofotherapplicablelanddevelopmentcodesremainineffectwithrespecttothedevelopmentofthelandwhichcomprisesthisPUD Eo All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the RichlandMasterPlanarepartoftheregulationswhichgovernthemanner inwhichthelandmaybedeveloped LAND USE The Master Development Plan Exhibit A shows proposed land uses ofdevelopmentforeachparcelMinorvariationsinacreageshallbepermitted atfinaldesigntoaccommodatevegetationencroachmentsutilitiesmarketconditionsandotherheretounforeseensiteconditions LAND USE TYPE LAND USE SCHEDULE RESIDENTIAL open space reserve water management lakes COMMERCIAL open space reserve water management lakes ACREAGF 127 23 TOTAL 150 22 25 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL The provisions of Article 3 Division 33 of the Collier County Land DevelopmentCodeshallapplytothedevelopmentofplattedtractsorparcelsoflandpriortothe issuance of a building permit or other development order 26 RESUBDIVISION Resubdivision shall comply with Section 3275 of the Collier County Land Development Code 27 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements shall be provided for water management areas utilities and other purposes as may be needed Said easements and improvements shall be done in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code All necessary easements dedications or other instruments shall be grantedtoinsurethecontinuedoperationandmaintenanceofallserviceutilitiesin compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested 28 MODEL HOMES Model Homes and Model Home Sales Centers shall be permitted as provided for inSection26334oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 29 USE OF RIGHTSOFWAY Utilization of lands within all project rightsofway for landscaping decorative entrance ways and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Planning Services Director for engineering andsafetyconsiderationsduringthedevelopmentreviewprocessandpriortoanybuildingpermits 210 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in Article 2 Division 27Section2735oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 23 211 212 213 214 215 LIMITATIONS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This PUD is subject to the sunsetting provisions as provided for within Article 2Division27Section2734oftheCollierCountyDevelopmentCode PUD MONITORING An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Article 2 Division 27Section2736oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES The Developer shall create appropriate property owner associationswhich will be responsible for maintaining the roads streets drainage common areas and water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County OFFSTREET PARKING AND LOADING All offstreet parking and loading facilities shall be designed in accordance withDivision23oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A minimum of thirty percent 30 of the projects gross area shall be devoted to open space pursuant to Article 2 Division 26 Section 2632 of the Collier County Land Development Code The total project is 150 acres requiring a minimum of 45 acres to be retained as open space throughout the Richland PUD This requirement shall not apply to individual development parcels Of the projectstotal 150 acres the following acreages represent 30 ofthetotalsiteallcontributingtoopenspace Lake 11 acres Reserve 31 acres Buffer 7 acres TOTAL 48 acres of open space 24 216 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Article 3 Division 39 Section 39553 of the Collier County Land Development Code 25 of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be retained 217 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Article 3 Division 32 Section 328314 of the Collier County Land Development Code accommodation shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place 218 SIGNS Signs shall be in accordance with Article 2 Division 25 of the Collier County Land Development Code 219 LANDSCAPING Landscaping shall be in accordance with Article 2 Divisions 24 and 28 of the Collier County Land Development Code as amended In addition a 30foot TypeBBuffershallbeprovidedalongthetractboundarylineseparatingthecommercial and residential land use tracts See Exhibit B This buffer shall contain a 6foot tall precast concrete wall along the entire buffer 220 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATION The lake setback requirements described in Article 3 Division 35 Section 3571oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodemaybereducedwiththeadministrativeapprovaloftheCollierCountyPlanningServicesDirectorAlllakes greater than two 2 acres may be excavated to the maximum commercial excava tion depths set forth in Section 35731 however removal of fill from Richland shall be limited to an amount up to 10 percent per lake to a maximum of 20000cubicyardsofthetotalvolumeexcavatedunlessacommercialexcavationpermitisreceived 221 EXCAVATION AND VEGETATION REMOVAL Improvement of property shall be prohibited prior to issuance of building permit Nositeworkremovalofprotectedvegetationgradingimprovementofpropertyor construction of any type may be commenced prior to the issuance of a buildingpermitwherethedevelopmentproposedrequiresabuildingpermitundertheLandDevelopmentCodeorotherapplicableCountyregulations 25 Exceptions to this requirement may be granted by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for an approved Subdivision or Site De velopment Plan to provide for distribution of fill excavated on site or to permit con struction of an approved water management system to minimize stockpiles and hauling offsite or to protect the public health safety and welfare where clearinggradingandfillingplanshavebeensubmittedandapprovedmeetingthestandards of Section 32836 of the Code Removal of exotic vegetation shall be exempted upon receipt of a vegetation removal permit for exotics pursuant to Division 39 of the Land Development Code 222 SUBDIVISIONS Subdivisions shall be in accordance with Article 3 Division 32 of the Collier County Land Development Code 26 RESIDENTIAL 31 32 33 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithintheRichlandPUDdesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibitAasRResidential MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 400 residential dwelling units may be constructed on landsdesignatedR GENERAL DESCRIPTION Ao Areas designated as R on the Master Land Use Plan are designated to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling unit types Approximate acreage of land use tracts have been indicated on the PUDMasterPlaninordertoindicaterelativesizeanddistributionofthe residential uses These acreages are based on conceptual designs and must be considered to be approximate Actual acreage of all developmenttractswillbeprovidedatthetimeofpermittingResidentialtractsare designed to accommodate internal roadways Co Singlefamily lot sizes and development regulations shall be in accordancewithTable1ofthissectionandshallbeidentifiedbytheDeveloperatthetimeofPreliminarySubdivisionPlatapprovalpursuanttoCollierCountyZoningRegulationssetforthinDivision32oftheCollierCountyLand Development Code Multifamily uses and development regulations shall be in accordance with Table 1 of this section and shall be identified by the Developer at the time ofSiteDevelopmentPlanapprovalpursuanttoSection25ofthisdocumentandapplicableCollierCountyRegulationssetforthinDivision33oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode 31 34 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES 35 No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or land or water used in whole or in part for other than the following A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Singlefamily detached dwelling units Singlefamily attached and townhouse units Singlefamily zero lot line dwelling units Duplex dwelling units Multifamily dwelling units Nursing rest homes and adult congregate living facilities Recreational facilities including but not limited to parks playgrounds commonly owned open space pools tennis courts communitybuildingsguardhousesessentialservicesandutilitystructures Model homes sales centers and temporary developmentconstruction offices shall be permitted in conjunction with the promotion of the development Water management facilities and lakes Any other use which is in comparable in nature with the foregoing uses which the Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the R district B Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1 Customary accessory uses and structures including but not limited to covered parking attached and detached garages and swimmingpools 2 Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the R District PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Except as provided in Section 25B property development regulations forlandusesintheRResidentialDistrictaresetforthinTable1 Site development standards for categories 14 uses apply to individual residential lot boundaries Category 5 standards apply to platted parcelboundaries 32 Co Eo Fo Go Unless otherwise indicated required yards heights and floor area standards apply to principal structures Development standards for building relationships set forth in Table 1 shall be established during site development plan approval as set forth in Article 3 Division 33 of the Collier County Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use In the case of residential structures with a common architectural theme required property development regulations may be waived or reduced as provided by the provisions in Article 2 Division 26 Section 262746of the Collier County Land Development Code Common open spacerequirementsaredeemedsatisfiedpursuanttoSection216ofthis PUD Offstreet parking required for multifamily uses shall be accessed byparkingaislesordrivewayswhichareseparatefromanyroadswhich serve more than one development A green space area of not less that ten feet 10 in width as measured from pavement edge to pavement edge shall separate any parking aisle or driveway from any abutting road Singlefamily zero lot line dwellings units are identified separately from singlefamily detached dwelling units with conventional side yardrequirementstodistinguishthesetypesforthepurposeofapplyingdevelopmentstandardsunderTable1Zerolotlinedwellingsshall be defined as any type of detached singlefamily structure employing a zero or reduced side yard as set forth herein and which conform to requirements ofCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeArticle2Division26Subsection 2627441 through 3 No housing structure containing three 3 or more dwelling units may be located between two detached single family structures which are less than 300 feet apart if they are a part of the same platted block Approval of the location of multiple family structures relative to existing single familydetachedstructuresshallrestwiththeDevelopmentServicesDirector and shall be determined at the time of Site Development Plan preapplicationmeetings No nursing rest homes and adult congregate living facility shall be located within three hundred 300 feet of any single family detached or attached dwelling units Generally multiple family dwelling structures with dwellingunitsabovedwellingunitsshallactasatransitionareabetweennursingresthomesadultcongregatelivingfacilitiesandsinglefamilydetachedand attached dwelling units 33 TABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR R RESIDENTIAL AREAS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE ZERO SINGLE FAMILY FAMILY LOT ATTACHED AND DETACHED LINE DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE Category 1 2 3 4 Minimum Lot Area 5500 SF 5000 SF 3500 SF 3000 SF Minimum Lot 55 50 35 30Width5 Front Yard 20 3 20 3 20 3 20 3 Front Yard for Side 10 10 10 10EntryGarage Side Yard 5 6 0 or 75 0 or 5 BH Rear Yard Principal 20 10 20 20 Rear Yard Aces 10 5 10 10 sory Rear Yard 1 10 5 10 10 Maximum Building 35 35 35 35Height2 Distance Between 10 10 0 or 15 5 SBHPrincipalStructures Floor Area Min 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SFs MULTI FAMILY DWELLINGS 5 1 AC 150 25 15 05 BH BH 15 5 BH 35 5 SBH 1000 SF BH Building Height SBH Sum of Building Height Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purposes of detsnnlnlng setback requirements All distances are In feet unless otherwise noted 1 Rear yards setbacks for principal and accessory structures on lots that abut preserves shall be in accordancewith Section 328473ofthe LDC as amended Front yards shall be measured as follows A If the parcel Is served by a public rightofwaysetback la measured from the adjacent rightofwaylineBIftheparcelisservedbyaprivateroadsetbacklemeasuredfromthebackofcurbIfcurbedoredgeof pavement Ifnot curbed 2 Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the flret habltsble finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the sbucture 3 Singlefamily dwellings which provide for 2 parking spaces within an encloeed garage and provide for guest parking other than In private ddvewaya may reduce thefrontyardrequirementto5forthegarageand15fortheremainingstructures 4 Each halfof aduplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3500SF for atotal minimum lot area of 7000SF 3000square feet lot area allocation per dwelling unit forsinglefamilyattachedandtownhousedwellinguniteand3000squarefeetperdwellingunitforelngletamllyattachedandtownhouaedwellingunits Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20 for culdesaclots provided minimum lot area requirement Is still maintained 6 Zero feet 0or a minimum of five feet 5on either side except that where the zero foot 0yard option is utilized the oppositesideofthestructureshallhaveatenfoot10yardZerofoot03yardsnybeusedonbothsidesofastructureprovidedthattheoppositetenfoot10 yardisprovided 34 SECTION IV COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 41 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithinRichlanddesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibit A asCCommunityCommercial 42 MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE A maximum of 231000 square feet gross floor area of Community Commercial uses may be constructed on lands designated C on the Master Plan Exhibit ATheCommunityCommercialtractislimitedtoamaximumof23acres 43 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as C on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of commercial uses hotelmotel essential services and customary accessory uses The approximate acreage of the C district is indicated on the Master PlanThisacreageisbasedonconceptualdesignsandisapproximateActual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of SiteDevelopmentPlanorPreliminarySubdivisionPlatapprovalsinaccordancewithArticle3Division32andDivision33respectivelyoftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeCommunityCommercialtractsaredesignedtoaccommodateinternalroadwaysopenspaceslakeswater management facilities and other similar uses 44 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or landusedinwholeorinpartforotherthanthefollowing A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 2 3 4 Agricultural Services Group 0742 except no outside kennelingAmusementandRecreationServicesIndooronlyGroups7911794179917993 Apparel and Accessory Stores Groups 56115621 56315641565156615699 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations Groups 551155315541 41 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Automotive Repair Services and Parking Group 7542BuildingMaterialsHardwareGardenSupplywithnooutside storage or display Groups 52315251 5261 Business Services Groups 73117323 7334 7335 7336 733873527371737973847389 Communications Groups 4832 4833 Depository Institutions Groups 60116099EatingandDrinkingPlacesGroups5812 Engineering Accounting and Management 87118721 8741 87428748 Food Stores Groups 5411 54215441 5451 5461 5499GeneralMerchandiseStoresGroups531153315399HealthServicesGroups80118049 Home Furniture Furnishings and Equipment Stores Groups 571257135714571957225731573457355736HotelsandMotelsGroup7011 Insurance Agents Brokers and Service Group 6411MembershipOrganizationsGroups86418661MiscellaneousRepairServicesGroups762276297631MiscellaneousRetailGroups59125921593259415949 599259935999 Motion Pictures Groups 7832 Museum Art Galleries Group 8412NonDepositoryCreditInstitutionsGroups 61416159 6162 6163PersonalServicesGroups721172127215721972217231724172517291 Real Estate Groups 6531 65416552SocialServicesGroup8351 45 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES A Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoingusesandwhichthePlanningServicesDirectordeterminestobe compatible 42 46 Development Standards A Minimum lot area Ten thousand 10000 square feet B Minimum lot width One hundred 100 feet Minimum yard requirements 1 Front yard twentyfive 25 feet 2 Side yard zero or ten 0 or 10 feet 3 Rear yard twenty 20 feet Distance between principal structures One half the sum of walls oppositeoneanotherbutnotlessthanten10feet Eo Minimum floor area of principal structure seven hundred and fifty square feet 750 per building on the ground floor Landscaping and OffStreet Parking shall be in accordance with theCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodeAllparkinglotlightingshall be Iowintensityandshieldedfromresidentialareas G Maximum height fifty feet 50 and not to exceed two stories for commercial structures within 60 feet of the residential tract boundary line H General application for Setbacks Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following 1 2 3 If the parcel is served by a public or private rightofway setback is measured from the adjacent rightofway line If the parcel is served by a nonplatted private drive setback ismeasuredfromthebackofcurboredgeofpavementIftheparcelisservedbyaplattedprivatedrivesetbackismeasuredfromtheroadeasementorpropertyline Maximum density of HotelMotel lodging facilities 1 The net platted density of hotel rooms per acre may not exceedtwentysix26unitsperacre Jo Commercial trash dumpsters shall be located or placed within 100 feet of any residential tract boundary line 43 SECTION V RESERVE DISTRICT 51 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and developmentstandardsforareaswithinRichlanddesignatedontheMasterPlanExhibit A asReserve 52 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Reserve on the PUD Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of conservation and limited water management uses andfunctionsTheprimarypurposeoftheReserveDistrictistoretainviablenaturallyfunctioningwetlandsystemstoallowfortherestorationandenhancementof impacted or degraded wetland systems and to provide an open space amenity fortheenjoymentofRichlandresidents 53 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected altered or used or land or water used in whole or in part for other than the following A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1 Passive recreational areas boardwalks and recreational shelters 2 Nature trails excluding asphalt paved surfaces 3 Water management facilities structures and lake bulkheads or other architectural treatments 4 Mitigation areas 5 Any other conservation and related open space activity or use whichiscomparableinnaturewiththeforegoingusesandwhichthe Planning Services Director determines to be compatible in the Reserve District 51 54 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All setbacks from preserve areas shall be in accordance with Section 328473 of the LDC as amended 55 RESERVE DISTRICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT A nonexclusive conservation easement or tract is required by Collier County LandDevelopmentCodeSection328473forpreservationlandsincludedintheReserveDistrictInadditiontoCollierCountyaconservationeasementmayalsoberequiredbyotherregulatoryagencieswithjurisdictionoverReserveDistrictlandsInadditiontocomplyingwithprovisionsoftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCodesaideasementshallbeprovidedinaccordancewiththetermssetforthintheapplicablepermitgrantedbysaidagenciesTheRichlandCommonsAssociationshallberesponsibleforcontrolandmaintenanceoflandswithintheReserveDistrict 52 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTR 61PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the standards for development of the project 62 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the final site development plans the final subdivision plats and all applicable state and local laws codes and regulations relating to the subdivision of the land except whenspecificallynotedorotherwisesetforthinthisdocumentorasotherwiseapprovedbyCollierCountyAllstateandfederalpermitsshallbeeffectiveaccordingtothestipulationsandconditionsofthepermittingagenciesFinalmasterplansfinalsitedevelopmentplansorfinalsubdivisionplatsandstandardsandspecificationsof the Collier County Land Development Code relating to the same shall apply to thisprojectexceptasotherwisesetforthherein 63 PUD MASTER PLAN Ao The Master Plan Exhibit A is an illustrative preliminary development planThedesignelementsandlayoutillustratedontheMasterPlanshallbe understood to be flexible so that the final design may satisfy the Developerscriteria and comply with all applicable requirements of thisordinance The Planning Services Director shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the Richland Master Plan upon written requestoftheDeveloper C The following limitations shall apply to such requests 1 The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Richland PUD document 2 The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Article 2 Division 27 Subsection 27352 of the Collier County Land Development Code 61 3 The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacentlandusesandshallnotcreatedetrimentalimpactstoabuttingland uses water management facilities and Reserve areas within or external to the PUD Do All necessary easements dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continuance operation and maintenance of all service utilities Eo Agreements provisions or covenants which govern the use maintenance and continued protection of the PUD and common areas will be provided 64 DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS A TRANSPORTATION 1 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall providefifty50feetofadditionalroadrightofwayalongthesouthsideof Immokalee Road in accordance with the procedures and standards ofSubsection222037oftheCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode Road Impact Fee credits will be allowed for this rightofway to the maximum extent provided in the Road Impact Fee Ordinance and in accordance with the approved conversion formula 2 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall provideleftandrightturnlanesatallprojectaccessesonbothImmokalee Road and CR951 If median openings are permitted upon the four laning of either road the Developer shall be responsible for the cost of all intersection modifications needed to serve project accesses 3 The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at any project access when deemed war ranted by the County The signals will be owned operated and main tained by Collier County 4 When deemed warranted by the County the Developer shall providearteriallevelstreetlightingatallprojectaccesses 5 The road impact fee shall be as provided by Ordinance Number 01 13 or as may be amended and shall be paid at the time building permitsareissuedunlessotherwiseapprovedbytheBoardofCountyCommissioners 6 Access improvements shall not be subject to impact fee credits andexcludingtrafficsignalsshallbeinplacebeforeanycertificatesof occupancy are issued 62 7 8 9 All traffic control devices used excluding street name signs shall conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required in Chapter 3160747 Florida Statutes The commercial tract shall provide an internal vehicular cross access to the residential tract Sidewalks shall be provided on one side of the interconnect road A metal security gate shall be placed on the com mercial tract to allow for the stacking of a minimum of three vehicles on the commercial tract Gate maintenance shall be the responsibilityofthecommercialpropertyownersandortheirpropertyowners association No construction traffic shall use this interconnectio Access locations to Immokalee Road and to Collier Boulevard are conceptual and subject to review and approval at final site plansubmittalconsistentwiththeAccessControlPolicyResolution01242asmaybeamendedandtheCollierCountyConstruction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public RightofWayOrdinance9364asmaybeamendedAllaccessandmedianlocationsaresubjecttomodificationandorclosureatthediscretionofCollierCountybasedonsafetyoperationorcapacityreasons B WATER MANAGEMENT 1 2 3 Excavation permits will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 35 of the Collier County Land DevelopmentCodeasamendedExcavatedmaterialfromthepropertyisintended to be used within the project site 4 The Developer shall be responsible for the installation of properlysizedculvertsattheproposedentranceroadlocationsplacedontherelocatedswalecenterlineatsuchtimeasdrivewaysareinstalled Detailed paving grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review No construction permitsshallbeissuedunlessanduntilapprovaloftheproposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted byEngineeringReviewServices In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water ManagementDistrictChapters40E4and40E40thisprojectshallbedesignedforastormeventof3daydurationand25yearfrequency 63 C 5 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of Division 32 of theCollierCountyLandDevelopmentCode UTILITIES 1 2 3 4 Water Distribution sewage collection and transmission and interim water andor sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to bedesignedconstructedconveyedownedandmaintainedin accordance with Collier County Ordinance No 9717 as amendedandotherapplicableCountyrulesandregulations 5 All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewagecollectionfacilitiestobeconstructedwillbecustomersoftheCountyandwillbebilledbytheCountyinaccordancewiththeCountysestablishedratesShouldtheCountynotbeinapositiontoprovidewaterandorsewerservicetotheprojectthewaterandorsewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the Countysoffsite water andor sewerfacilitiesareavailabletoservetheproject It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimatelysupplypotablewatertomeettheconsumptivedemandandor receive and treat the sewage generated by this project Should the County system not be in a position to supply potable water to theprojectandorreceivetheprojectswastewateratthetime development commences the Developer at its expense will install and operate interim water supply and onsite treatment facilitiesandorinterimonsitesewagetreatmentanddisposalfacilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatoryagenciesAnagreementshallbeenteredintobetweentheCountyandtheDeveloperbindingontheDeveloperhisassignsor successors regarding any interim treatment facilities to be utilized The agreement must be legally sufficient to the County prior to theapprovalofconstructiondocumentsfortheprojectandbein conformance with Collier County Ordinance No 9717 as amended If an interim onsite water supply treatment and transmission facility isutilizedtoservetheprojectitmustbeproperlysizedtosupplyaveragepeakdaydomesticdemandinadditiontofireflowdemand at a rate approved by the appropriate Fire Control District servicingtheprojectarea Public Service Commission Territories Prior to approval of constructiondocumentsbytheCountytheDevelopermlstpresentverificationpursuanttoChapter367Florida 64 D 2 3 4 Statutes that the Florida Public Service Commission has grantedterritorialrightstotheDevelopertoprovidesewerandorwaterservice to the project until the County can provide these services through its water and sewer facilities ENVIRONMENTAL 1 Petitioner shall be subject to Division 39 of the Collier CountyLandDevelopmentCoderequiringtheacquisitionofatree removal permit prior to any land clearing A site clearing planshallbesubmittedtotheCommunityDevelopmentand Environmental Services Administrator for review and approvalpriortoanysubstantialworkonthesiteThisplanmaybe submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum extent possible and how roads buildings lakes parking lots and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal All exotic plants as defined in the Land Development Code shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas open space areas and preserve areas Following site development a maintenance program shall be implemented to prevent reinvasionofthesitebysuchexoticspeciesThisplanwhichwilldescribe control techniques and inspection intervals shall be filed with and approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator If during the course of site clearing excavation or other constructional activities an archaeological or historical site artifact or other indicatorisdiscoveredalldevelopmentatthatlocationshallbeimmediatelystoppedandtheCodeEnforcementDepartmentshallbenotified Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to en able the Code Enforcement Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salvageability The Code Enforcement Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to provideonlyaminimalinterruptiontoanyconstructionalactivities Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state ofFloridaEnvironmentalResourcePermitrulesandbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbyCurrentPlanningEnvironmentalReviewStaff 65 Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigationforimpactstoCollierCountyjurisdictionalwetlands 5 This PUD shall be in compliance with Division 311 of the LDC as amended which provides protection for Endangered Threatened and Listed Species E SUBSTITUTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 1 Section 328319 Street name signs shall be approved bytheCountyEngineerbutneednotmeetUSDOTFHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Street pavementpaintingstripingandreflectiveedgingrequirementsshallbe subject to the County Engineersapproval but need not meet standard county requirements 2 Section 3284165 Street rightsofway and crosssections for the roads shall be as designated by developer at time of final construction plans 3 Section 3284166 The 1000 feet maximum deadend street lengthrequirementshallbewaived 4 Section 3284168 Back of curb radii may be reduced to thirty 30feetatlocalintersections 5 Section 32841610 The requirement for one hundred 100feettangentsectionsbetweenreversecurvesofstreetsshallbewaived 6 Section 328421 The requirement for blank utility casings shall be subject to County engineering approval but need not meet standard County requirements F MISCELLANEOUS 1 Access to the project shall be restricted to those access pointsshownonExhibitA 66 I N Ad o ov LEGEND WE o00 RIDENLCLUDING ES 79 S SCALE 1 400 RERDRHTOFWAY 6ACcPRECTACCSToCPUDMASTERPLANEXHIBITAVasseDa1orooto1o1 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I DWIGHT E BROCK Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Collier County Florida hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corre copy of ORDINANCE 200207 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 12th day of February 2002 during Regular Session WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County Florida this 19th day of February 2002 DWIGHT E BROCKpClerkofCourts Exofficio to B6a County Commissiet By Ellie Hof fman Deputy Clerk