Loading...
Agenda 01/21/2020 Item # 2A01/21/2020 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 2.A Item Summary: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Meeting Date: 01/21/2020 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – County Manager's Office Name: Geoffrey Willig 01/15/2020 11:59 AM Submitted by: Title: County Manager – County Manager's Office Name: Leo E. Ochs 01/15/2020 11:59 AM Approved By: Review: County Manager's Office Geoffrey Willig County Manager Review Completed 01/15/2020 12:00 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 01/21/2020 9:00 AM 2.A Packet Pg. 3 Rural Lands Stewardship Area WORKSHOP Board of County Commissioners January 21, 2020 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Pre sentation Highlights 2 Re cent Board Action History Pe rs pectives Comprehensive Planning, Transportation Planning, Environmental Planning, Community & Human Services, and Zoning 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Environmental Planning Comprehensive Planning Tr ansportation Planning Community & Human Services Special Districts Elements of To wns & Villages Ta ble of Contents 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Re cent Board Actions October 22, 2019 Directed Staff to: 1.Bring forward Growth Management Plan amendments for the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, as prepared by the 5-year Review Committee and presented in the RLSA White Paper; 2.Develop a regional water partnership; and 3.Draft Land Development Code (LDC) amendments to address SRA characteristics as outlined by the 5-year Review Committee and the RLSA White Paper. RLSA Adopted Map RLSA Stat us Map (March 2019) 4 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 5 RLSA Adoption Benefits “The RLSA achieved something many thought impossible. It created an ongoing working relationship among environmentalists, landowners, community advocates and representatives.” Nancy Pay ton Florida Wildlife Federation RLSA Voluntary Program §Established a Long Range Plan to Incentivize the Objectives: §Preserve Natural Resources §Protect Agriculture §Improve the Pattern of Growth §Develop a regional transportation system 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 6 RLSA Today Benefits RLSA Plan has realized: •55,000 acres preserved at no cost to the public •5,000 Acre Town of Ave Maria •Ave Maria University •Arthrex manufacturing expansion RLSA Voluntary Program 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 7 RLSA Future Benefits •Protection of 134,000 acres •Flowways areas •(Camp Keais Strand and Okaloalcoochee Slough) •Habitat areas •Agriculture areas •Additional panther corridors •45,000 acres of towns and villages •Diversification of eastern Collier County economy RLSA Voluntary Program 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 8 Special Districts 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Chapter 189 Stewardship Districts -Ave Maria Stewardship Community District -Big Cypress Stewardship District PURPOSE: •Authorized to provide government services, other than police power •Developments must be compliant with County ’s Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) •Provide public infrastructure and services in a timely manner •Promote smart development of rural village communities •Best achieved utilizing a single integrated plan of infrastructure construction and operation 9 Ave Maria Map Big Cypress Map 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 10 Big Cypress Stewardship District Histo ry Highlights §October 28, 2003 Board of County Commissioners Meeting •Approved a resolution supporting the creation of the Big Cypress Stewardship District o Required Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement within 90 days of Act §October 26, 2004 Board of County Commissioners Meeting •Approved an Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement which set aside right-of-way for: o Oil Well Road (Donated) o Immokalee Road (Donated) o Randall Boulevard Extension (Transportation Impact Fee Credits) §Agreement was never executed §In 2009 –the Oil Well Road right-of-way was donated to the County 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 11 Big Cypress Stewardship District Histo ry Highlights Future Tra nsportation Considerations §October 26, 2004 BCC Meeting §During the discussion, representatives of Collier Enterprises stated: •No agreement on future corridor locations; no one had studied it •County should request ROW dedication at the time of zoning action •Agreed to work together on a solution that solves the interconnection, develop better solutions that serve all the transportation public in Collier County •Willingness to work with the County on Randall and many other corridors that the County puts into its long- range plan 3 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 12 Comprehensive Planning Pe rs pective 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 13 RLSA Fundamenta ls §An overlay to existing Agricultural/Rural FLUM designation §Stewardship Program is a type of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program §Vo luntary incentive-based program §Based on technical analysis §Primarily an incentive-based program §Land conservation supported by participants, at no cost to taxpayers RLSA Voluntary Program 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Attachment “C ” SRA Characteristics 14 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) Policies §Greenfield development –no design constraints §Facilitate compact form of development §Utilize creative land use planning techniques §Tr ansition of density in SRA to lands outside it §Include mixed of uses –retail, office, recreational, civic, government, institutional §Self-sufficient in provision of services, facilities, and infrastructure §Include mixed-use center to serve as focal point for community services and facilities §Diversity of housing types §Public facility impacts –SRA planned and designed to be fiscally neutral or positive to Collier County at horizon year §BCC may require lands “for parks, schools, and other public facilities are set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use” 15 4 P P P P 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Stewardship Receiving Area Consistency Growth Management Plan (GMP) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) §Po licy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of the land use type. §Po licy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. NOTE §Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element addresses the interconnection of local streets between developments 16 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 17 3 Wa lkability 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Tr ansportat ion Planning Pe rs pective 18 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 19 Collier Metropolitan Planning Orga nization (MPO) PURPOSE §Establishes a vision and goals §Sets priorities §Involves the public, a forum for decision making §Ensures the area’s long-term goals and needs are met METHOD §Long Range Tra nsportation Plan (LRTP) 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 20 Long Range Tra nsportation Plan §Re quired to receive state and fe deral §Re quired to account for current and projected transportation demands, people, goods §Coordinates land use and transportation planning 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 21 2040 Long Range Tra nsportation Plan (LRTP) Original §2040 LRTP did not account for full transportation impacts of Big Cypress Stewardship District §Collier Enterprises provided funding for an amendment •Amendment reallocated growth areas o Maintained original population estimates (497,700) o No new population or commercial was added §Needs evaluated using traffic model •Identified new transportation projects based on the demand 3 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 22 2040 Long Range Tra nsportation Plan Amendment §Adopted on May 25, 2018 §Resulted in: •Big Cypress Parkway from Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard added to the Needs Plan. •Po rtions of Vanderbilt Beach Ro ad Extension and Randall Boulevard added to the Cost Feasible Plan Amended Needs Plan 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 23 Big Cypress Parkway Viable Alternative 2 Plus (2+) Future Network 4-Lane Everglades Blvd Oil Well Road Desoto Blvd NImmokalee RdRandall Blvd Va nderbilt Beach Road Future Big Cypress PkwyFuture Extension Proposed 4-Lane Everglades Blvd Potential Reliever for Immokalee Road Everglades BlvdReserve all Right-of-Way: §Wa ter Resources Areas (WRA) have not been included in the Stewardship Receiving Areas which leaves gaps in the right-of-way §Stewardship District was intended to be a single integrated plan, however, a portion of the property has already been sold to another landowner. Staff is unaware of any provisions or disclosures; notify new owner of the right-of-way need. §Allows for improvements to be brought online more expeditiously when needed. •The MPO & Collier Transportation Planning have determined Big Cypress Parkway is essential to the network based on the growth expected 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Stewardship Receiving Area Interco nnections §Policy 9.3: Transportation Element Compliments •Policy 7.3 -Policy 7.4 FLUE §Master Mobility Plan (Section 4) •Modeled RLSA •Determined that an interconnected roadway network: o REDUCED vehicle miles travelled o REDUCE vehicle hours travelled §Connectivity enhances emergency §Connectivity enhances evacuation options §Distributes traffic among multiple streets §Less volume = more inviting walk 24 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 25 Connectivity 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Connectivity 26 Poor connectivity results in car dependence We ak pedestrian connections force people into cars and traffic onto a few streets which must carry heavier traffic volumes. This model of planning makes walking uncomfortable and impractical since destinations are at a distance. We ll-connected streets encourage active transport but destinations are needed High levels of connectivity offer people choices for transportation. Speeds are typically lower as traffic is disbursed across a network, making walking and cycling safer and more comfortable. We ll-connected and destination-rich streets create healthy communities With many nearby destinations, a life radius shrinks to one or two miles since all needs are met locally. Most trips are accomplished on foot or bicycle, reducing traffic and keeping money in the local community. This is the goal. 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Connectivity 27 Golden Gate Ave Maria 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands 28 Connectivity 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Connected vs. Not Connected 29Golden Gate Longshore Lakes 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Interco nnectivity Retrofit Impediments: Gates, Walls & People 30 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Environmenta l Planning Pe rs pective 31 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands §Protect agricultural land and prevent premature conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses §Direct incompatible uses away from wetland and upland habitats (FSAs, HSAs, WRAs) §Enable the conversion of rural land to other uses in appropriate locations §Established Stewardship Sending Areas (SSA) §Established Stewardship Receiving Areas (SRA) to develop areas 32 RLSA Environment -Fundamentals 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands §Original RLSA Study and current LDC define all Index Values for the entire RLSA §Quantifies the number of acres by Index Values (4.08.07.D.3) •Lands with an NRI Value • 1.2 are appropriate for SRA Development •Any lands an Index Value > 1.2 must be retained as open space •Index Values are reviewed with each application to confirm the current NRI Va lue §GIS Data is analyzed in 1-acre polygons to obtain NRI score §Applicant submits a summary of NRI Values, total acreage, and supporting data for each Value 33 RLSA Environment -Methods 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Community and Human Services Pe rs pective Housing Affo rd ability 34 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Housing Affo rdability Review §Housing Element of the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan •Goal 1: To create an adequate supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and Affordable Housing for all residents of Collier County. •Objective 1: Provide new affordable housing units in order to meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low, moderate and affordable workforce incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County. •Objective 2: Increase the number of affordable housing units, by the methods contained in Objective 1 and subsequent Policies, for very-low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents with the assistance of for-profit and not- for-profit providers of affordable housing, within the County and its municipalities. •Policy 2.2: Partnerships shall be encouraged between private developers, non-profit entities, local governments and other interested parties to ensure the development of housing that meets the needs of the County ’s very-low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents. 35 Housing Element Review (GMP): POLICY CRITERIA 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands §Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan •Po licy 4.7.2:Villages are primarily residential communities with a diversity of housing types and mix of uses appropriate to the scale and character of the particular village …Design criteria for Villages shall be included in the LDC Stewardship District. §Land Development Code •4.08.07 -SRA Designation J.Design Criteria.3.Village Design Criteria.a.General criteria.iv.Offer a range of housing types and price levels to accommodate diverse ages and incomes.Accessory dwelling units shall not count towards the maximum allowed density. §Development of Regional Impact (DRI)–Removed by State Legislature in 2015 •Required an affordable housing needs analysis combined with market study and objective criteria and specific commitments. •Wa s a the safeguard to ensure regional development issues are addressed in the RLSA without the need to specifically require in local codes. •DRI requirements were eliminated from State Law in 2015 Housing Affo rdability Review-RLSA Standard of Review (applicable sections of GMP and LDC): POLICY CRITERIA 36 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands What is a “Diversity of Housing Types”? 37 Diverse in COLOR Ty pes of Diversity •Size, Shape, Type, Single-Fam/Multi-Fam) What is the threshold to be DIVERSE? •1% 10% 50% 75% Lacking Diversity 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands What is a “Range of housing types and price levels to accommodate diverse ages and incomes”? 38 §Diverse Incomes? Grey Oaks Naples-On 1/10/20 = 47 Single Family Homes for Sale $870K-$8Mill; 4 Condominiums for Sale $775K-$2.1Mill §Diverse Ages? Moorings Park at Grey Oaks is a Life Plan Community which is a residential community offering a long-term contract providing maintenance-free living, dining, wellness services and future assistance for changing healthcare needs. Offered at $1.3M-$3 Million 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands §Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan-Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-3.G.2. •A mixture of housing types,including single-family attached and detached,as well as multi-family. •Projects providing affordable-workforce housing as required in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay contained in the Collier County Land Development Code shall receive a credit of 0.5 units for each unit constructed. §Land Development Code 2.03.08 -Rural Fringe Zoning Districts A.4.b.Rural Villages 2.(a)i.Allocation of Land Uses. •Specific allocations for land uses including residential,commercial and other non-residential uses within rural villages,shall include,but are not limited to: o A mixture of housing types,including attached and/or detached single family,as well as multi-family shall be provided within a rural village. o A minimum of 0.2 units per acre in a rural village shall be affordable housing, §Of which at least 0.1 units per acre shall be workforce housing. o The rural village shall be designed so as to disperse the Affordable and workforce housing units throughout the Village rather than concentrate them in a single location. Standard of Review (applicable sections of GMP and LDC): OBJECTIVE CRITERIA Housing Affo rd ability Review-RFMUD 39 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands What is a “0.2 u/a affo rdable with 0.1u/a Workforce”? 1,000 acre Village Example: 800 Market Rate homes 100 Affordable Homes (less than 80%AMI) 100 Workforce Homes (less than 120%AMI) Required to be designed to disperse the affordable and workforce housing units throughout the Village 40 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands RFMUD In Action §Immokalee Road Rural Village (as Submitted 2019) •2,000 acres (receiving lands) •4,000 Residential Units o 3,600 Market Units o 200 Affordable Units o 200 Workforce Units •Interconnected Roadway Grid Network •Tr affic Directed off of Bordering County Roads 41 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Housing Affo rdability Review RLSA vs. RFMUD Planning Area Development Type Key Points Housing Affordability Requirement Review Type RSLA To wn 1000-4000ac Village 100-1000ac Created/Funded by Land Owner Group Consultant. Relies on Innovation, Flexibility Offer a range of housing types and price levels to accommodate diverse ages and incomes. Policy Review DRI Review Requirements RFMUD Village 300-2500ac Includes specific measurable benchmarks and requirements Shall provide a minimum of 0.2 units per acre as affordable housing, of which at least 0.1 units per acre shall be workforce housing. Objective Review 42 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands To wn of Ave Maria Approval 2005 Housing Affo rdability Requirements §Development Approvals –5,027 Acres •11,000 Residential Units •690,000sqft Retail/Service •510,000sqft Office •400 Hotel Rooms •6,000 Student university •450 Units Assisted Living Facility •148,500sqft Civic Community Facilities •35,000sqft Medical, Schools, Churches 43 •Housing Affordability Commitments –2,150 units (1,900 onsite + 150 offsite); 18.63% of all approved residential •1,000 Moderate Income, owner-occupied •700 Low Income housing units (50% to be owner- occupied) •200 Very Low Income housing units, rental •In addition to the above on-site affordable housing provided a 28-acre parcel of developable land to Habitat for Humanity, suitable for the development of up to 150 units of very low income housing. NOTE: All Housing Affordably Commitments were removed by the BCC in 2014 with the rescission of the DRI 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Importance of Housing / Jobs Balance for Tr ansportation Network §“A balanced community is one in which residents can both live and work. Implicit in that concept is a broad mix of housing types to accommodate households (workers) of a range of income categories..” (G. Giuliano, School of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Southern California -Tr ansportation Research Record 1305) §17.4% of Collier County’s workforce (more than 40,000 people) commute to work DAILY from outside of Collier County §These employees work in Collier but live in Lee, Charlotte, or other counties where they spend their wages on rent, a mortgage, purchasing groceries, gas, and other necessities. §Their daily commutes from neighboring counties add to the traffic congestion on our roadways and diminish quality of life for all residents §When people who work in Collier are commuting to adjoining Counties to live, Collier then bears the costs of providing the roads to move them, without the benefit of receiving the tax revenue from them §Resort and second-home communities particularly require retail and service employees, but many of these employees are not able to live near their jobs due to a lack of housing that is affordable. 44 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Zo ning Perspective 45 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Re gional Review Issues With the elimination of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process, a developer can now submit separate SRA Village applications (piecemeal development) instead of one unified plan of development as outlined in the Aggregation Rule below. 380.0651(4), FS 2017 –AGGREGATION RULE: 4) Two or more developments, represented by their owners or developers to be separate developments, shall be aggregated and treated as a single development under this chapter when they are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and are physically proximate to one other. •The criteria of three of the following subparagraphs must be met in order for the state land planning agency to determine that there is a unified plan of development: o 1.a.The same person has retained or shared control of the developments; o 1.b.The same person has ownership or a significant legal or equitable interest in the developments; or o 1.c.There is common management of the developments controlling the form of physical development or disposition of parcels of the development. •2.There is a reasonable closeness in time between the completion of 80 percent or less of one development and the submission to a governmental agency of a master plan or series of plans or drawings for the other development which is indicative of a common development effort. •3.A master plan or series of plans or drawings exist covering the developments sought to be aggregated which have been submitted to a local general-purpose government, water management district, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, or the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes for authorization to commence development. The existence or implementation of a utility ’s master utility plan required by the Public Service Commission or general-purpose local government or a master drainage plan shall not be the sole determinant of the existence of a master plan. •4. There is a common advertising scheme or promotional plan in effect for the developments sought to be aggregated. 46 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Rural Lands Stewardship Area Workshop Presentation - FINAL (11353 : Rural Lands Attachment C Typical Characteristics Town*Village Hamlet Size (Gross Acres)1,000-4,000 acres 100-1,000 acres**40-100 acres**100 Acres or less**Greater Than 100 Acres** Residential Units (DUs) per gross acre base density 1-4 DUs per gross acre***1-4 DUs per gross acre***1/2 -2 DU per gross acre***1/2 -2 DU per gross acre***1-4 DUs per gross acre*** Residential Housing Styles Full range of single family and multi-family housing types, styles, lot sizes Diversity of single family and multi-family housing types, styles, lot sizes Single Family and limited multi-family Single Family and limited multi-family ****Single Family and limited multi-family **** Retail & Office - .5 Retail & Office - .5 Retail & Office - .5 Retail & Office - .5 Retail & Office - .5 Civic/Governmental/Institution - .6 Civic/Governmental/Institution - .6 Civic/Governmental/Institution - .6 Civic/Governmental/Institution - .6 Civic/Governmental/Institution - .6 Manufacturing/Light Industrial - .45 Group Housing - .45 Group Housing - .45 Group Housing - .45 Group Housing - .45 Group Housing - .45 Transient Lodging - 26 upa net Transient Lodging - 26 upa net Transient Lodging - 26 upa net Transient Lodging - 26 upa net Transient Lodging - 26 upa net Goods and Services Town Center with Community and Neighborhood Goods and Services in Town and Village Centers: Minimum 65 SF gross building area per DU; Corporate Office, Manufacturing and Light Industrial Village Center with Neighborhood Goods and Services in Village Centers: Minimum 25 SF gross building area per DU Convenience Goods and Services: Minimum 10 SF gross building area per DU Convenience Goods and Services: Minimum 10 SF gross building area per DU Village Center with Neighborhood Goods and Services in Village Centers: Minimum 25 SF gross building area per DU Interim Well and Septic Interim Well and Septic Interim Well and Septic Community Parks (200 SF/DU) Parks & Public Green Spaces w/n Neighborhoods (minimum 1% of gross acres) Public Green Space for Neighborhoods (minimum 1% of gross acres) Public Green Space for Neighborhoods (minimum 1% of gross acres) Parks & Public Green Spaces w/n Neighborhoods (minimum 1% of gross acres) Parks & Public Green Spaces w/n Neighborhoods Active Recreation/Golf Courses Active Recreation/Golf Courses Lakes Lakes Active Recreation/Golf Courses Open Space Minimum 35% of SRA Open Space Minimum 35% of SRA Lakes Open Space Minimum 35% of SRA Wide Range of Services - minimum 15 SF/DU Moderate Range of Services - minimum 10 SF/DU; Limited Services Limited Services Moderate Range of Services - minimum 10 SF/DU Full Range of Schools Full Range of Schools Pre-K through Elementary Schools Pre-K through Elementary Schools Pre-K through Elementary Schools Auto - interconnected system of collector and local roads; required connection to collector or arterial Auto - interconnected system of collector and local roads; required connection to collector or arterial Auto - interconnected system of local roads Auto - interconnected system of local roads Auto - interconnected system of collector and local roads; required connection to collector or arterial Interconnected sidewalk and pathway system Interconnected sidewalk and pathway system Pedestrian Pathways Pedestrian Pathways Interconnected sidewalk and pathway system County Transit Access Equestrian Trails Equestrian Trails Equestrian Trails Equestrian Trails County Transit Access County Transit Access * - Towns are prohibited within the ACSC, per policy 4.7.1 of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies. ** - Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments within the ACSC are subject to location and size limitations, per policy 4.21, and are subject to Chapter 28-25, FAC. *** - Density can be increased beyond the base density through the Affordable Housing Density Bonus or through the density blending provision, per policy 4.7. **** Those CRDs that include single or multi-family residential uses shall include proportaionate support services. Underlined uses are not required uses. Transportation Individual Well and Septic System; Centralized or decentralized community treatment system Recreation and Open Spaces Centralized or decentralized community treatment system Centralized or decentralized community treatment systems Civic, Governmental and Institutional Services Individual Well and Septic System; Centralized or decentralized community treatment system Maximum Floor Area Ratio or Intensity Collier County RLSA Overlay Water and Wastewater Stewardship Receiving Area Characteristics Compact Rural Development Centralized or decentralized community treatment systems RLSAO Attachment C G, Comp, David, E. Lands GMPAs WM-dw-cf/10-18-02 2.A.2 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: LINK-RLSAO Attachment C - Ord_07-18 (11353 : Rural Lands Stewardship Area)