The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/10/2019 Item #11F (LDC Price Street/Triangle Boulevard)12/10/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to provide staff with direction regarding changes to an amendment to the LDC involving self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. This is a follow-up to the item reviewed by the Board at the September 10, 2019 BCC Meeting, Item 11.C. (formerly 16.A.1.). OBJECTIVE: To provide staff with direction regarding changes to an amendment to the LDC involving self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. CONSIDERATIONS: On September 10, 2019, staff brought a request to the Board to advertise an ordinance that would amend the LDC to create separation standards for self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to a recommendation of the Corridor Study. However, the Board voted 4 -1 not to advertise the ordinance. Instead, the Board unanimously voted to bring back the item later in order to have a greater discussion about additional restrictions, incentives, or alternatives. In the Recommendations section of this executive summary, staff has provided recommendations for different approaches to the LDC amendment. Pursuant to LDC Section 10.03.06 K., any direction from the Board to draft an ordinance that changes at least ten contiguous acres of the zoning map or a change to the list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses requires the following public hearings: a. At least one Planning Commission hearing. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) may elect by a majority decision to hear such ordinance or resolution at two public hearings. If there is only one CCPC hearing, the hearing shall be held after 5:00 p.m. on a weekday, and if there are two CCPC hearings, then at least one of the hearings shall be held after 5:00 p.m. on a weekday. b. At least two Board hearings. At least one hearing shall be h eld after 5:00 p.m. on a weekday unless the Board by a majority vote plus one vote elects to conduct that hearing at another time of day. Since the previous draft did not include changes to the list of permitted or conditional uses, some of the recommendations below may require review at a night hearing by the CCPC and the Board. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this action. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote is needed for Board direction. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: To provide staff with direction regarding changes to an amendment to the LDC involving self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, to include but not be limited to following: 1. In C-4 zoning along the subject Corridor, allow self-storage facilities as a permitted use rather than a conditional use, if located within a vertical mixed-use building and at least 51% of the 11.F Packet Pg. 1228 12/10/2019 entire first floor is comprised of commercial uses. Once constructed, the future conversion of the first floor commercial uses to self-storage would require conditional use approval. 2. Allow a reduction of the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces and/or landscape buffer(s) for a mixed-use project consisting of a self-storage facility and any neighborhood- serving use. Prepared By: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division Jeremy Frantz, AICP, LDC Manager, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Collier County Self Storage by Commissioner District (PDF) 2. [Linked] Previously reviewed LDC amendment (PDF) 3. Staff Presentation (PDF) 11.F Packet Pg. 1229 12/10/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.F Doc ID: 10848 Item Summary: Recommendation to provide staff with direction regarding changes to an amendment to the LDC involving self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport- Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. This is a follow-up to the item reviewed by the Board at the September 10, 2019 BCC Meeting, Item 11.C. (formerly 16.A.1.). (Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager, Zoning Division) Meeting Date: 12/10/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Eric Johnson 11/13/2019 4:57 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning – Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 11/13/2019 4:57 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 11/14/2019 4:17 PM Zoning Jeremy Frantz Additional Reviewer Completed 11/15/2019 5:10 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 11/22/2019 3:27 PM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 11/22/2019 4:58 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 11/25/2019 4:01 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/25/2019 4:03 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 11/25/2019 4:40 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 11/26/2019 4:22 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/02/2019 9:21 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/10/2019 9:00 AM 11.F Packet Pg. 1230 !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( Gaspar Self Storage Hiwasse Storage Angileri Self Storage Midgard Storage W illiam Huff StorageCategory 5 Stora ge Alliance Moving Storage Naples Moving Storage Rattlesnake Hammock Self Stora ge Hilton Movingand Stora ge City Gate Commence Par kSelf Stor age Facility Vincentian MPUD Self Storage Extra Space Storage East Naples Self Storage(Car l's - W hite GlovePersonal Storage) Sunbelt Rentals Sara Bay Marina Big Cypress Flea Mar ket Phase 3 Mini Stora ge StorAll Building Ultimate Garages, LLC Land America Storage Facility U-Store-It NBC Stora ge Public Storage Jim's Stow Away iStora ge Naples Hideaway Storage Bayshore Storage Warehouse Ser vies Maxi Self Storage Hide-Away Stora ge Naples EZ Storage Ace Super Storage Naples EZ Storage Adkos Self Storage Punta Cana Storage B & J Cool Storage Extra Space Storage Extra Space Storage Naples Mini-Storage Simply Self Storage Capital & StoreSmar t Storage Cypress Self Storage Downtown Mini Storage Recreational Warehouse Goodlette Self Stora ge Tollgate Business Park Storage Cubesmar t Self Storage CubeSmar t Self Stor age Cubesmar t self storage Cain-Jones Self Stor age Storesmar t Self Storage Pine Ridge Mini Storage Cain-Jones Self Storage The Lock UpSelf Stor ageBldg 1 & Bldg 2 Moder n Mover s Self Stor age Taray Inter national Warehouse Midgard Naples Boat & Self Storage Olde Naples Self Stor age (Nor th) Olde Naples Self Stora ge (S outh) U-Haul Moving & Stor a ge of Naples The Lock Up Storage Center s - Piper Blvd The Lock Up Stora ge Centers - Pine Ridge The Lock Up Stora ge Centers - Golden G ate IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE 75LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMI TRL NCOLLIER BLVDDAVIS BLVD TAMIAMI TRL EGOODLETTE RD NPI NE RI DGE RD RADIO RD GOLDEN GATE PKY LOGAN BLVD NVANDERBILT BEACH RDVANDERBILT DRAIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVDOLD US 41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD BONITA BEACH RD 111TH AVE N VANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT W I G G I N S PA S S R D C O L L I E R C O U N T Y S E L F S T O R A G E F A C I L I T YCOLLIER C O U N T Y S E L F S T O R A G E F A C I L I T Y !(!( !( !(Cool Storage Marco Storage Adkos Self Storage Prime Stor age - Mar co Island SAN MARCO RD COLLIER BLVDB A L D E A G L E D R N BARFIELD DR N COLLIER BLVDS BARFIELD DRS COL L I ER BL VDG O O D L A N D D R ±0 1 2 30.5 Miles LEE COUNTY §¨¦75 £¤41 !(951 !(951 !(951 £¤41 £¤41 §¨¦75 §¨¦75 Data Source: https://www.selfstorage.com/self-storage/florida/naplesCollier County Zoning/Planning SectionFile: Date: 2/2019 BigMarcoRiver BarfieldBay Caxambas Bay Gulf of Mexico MARCO ISLAND INSET LEGEND COMMSNR !(Existing Self Storage Fa cility !(Proposed Self Storage Fa cility Andy Solis, Esq . (D2 ) Burt L. Saunders (D3) Donna Fiala (D1) Penny Taylor (D4) William L. McDaniel, Jr. (D5) 11.F.1 Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: Collier County Self Storage by Commissioner District (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred Site Design)) Proposed Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting September 10, 2019 Move Item 16H1 to Item 10B: Proclamation designating October 10, 2019 as Republic of China Taiwan) Day in Collier County. To be hand delivered by Commissioner Penny Taylor at the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Miami, Florida on October 3, 2019. (Commissioner Saunders’ request) Move Item 16A1 to Item 11C: Recommendation to authorize staff to advertise for a future public hearing, an ordinance amending the Land Development Code related to the creation of separation standards for self- storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to the recommendations of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study. Commissioner Fiala’s request) Move Item 16D15 to Item 11D: Recommendation to approve a Resolution superseding Resolution No. 2016-140, establishing the Collier Area Transit Advertising Policy and Standards, Fee Policy, and the Agreed Terms and Conditions for Advertising on Transit assets and facilities, to expand the advertising policy, standards and fees to include digital advertising and a bench donation program, as directed at the Board's July 9, 2019 meeting. (Commissioner Fiala’s request) 9/10/2019 8:46 AM 09/10/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to authorize staff to advertise for a public hearing on October 22, 2019, an ordinance amending the Land Development Code related to the creation of separation standards for self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to the recommendations of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study. OBJECTIVE: Recommendation to authorize staff to advertise for a future public hearing, an ordinance amending the Land Development Code related to the creation of separation standards for self -storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport -Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to the recommendations of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study. CONSIDERATIONS: A segment of the U.S. 41 corridor, generally located between the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Collier Boulevard, has been under much scrutiny in recent years. In April of 2010, the East Naples Foundation completed Vision for the East Trail Corridor (“Vision”), which was a privately-initiated planning effort that resulted in the completion of a strategic plan for an approximately 14-mile stretch of the U.S. 41 corridor. On December 13, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) expressed concern over the proliferation of certain uses on U.S. 41 in this area of the U.S. 41 corridor. The Board considered adopting a one-year moratorium for all development orders involving self-storage, gas stations, car washes, and pawnshops on properties zoned General Commercial District (C -4) and Heavy Commercial District (C-5) along U.S. 41, from the Palm Street/Commercial Drive intersection to the Price Street intersection. However, rather than adopting a moratorium, the Board instead directed staff on February 14, 2017, to begin the process of developing a corridor study with the goal of obtaining community input and creating incentives for the desired development types. In April of 2018, Johnson Engineering, Inc. completed the U.S. 41 Corridor Study-Summary of Findings and Recommendations to the Board (“Corridor Study”) on behalf of the County. The Corridor Study was presented to and accepted by the Board on April 24, 2018. The length of U.S. 41 that was studied was approximately 6.8 miles, which is shorter than the geographic area used in Vision. The public input portion of the Corridor Study included three stakeholder outreach meetings and four public input meetings. When reviewing image preference surveys, 67 percent of the public outreach meeting respondents did not support self -storage facilities. As such, one of the recommendations of the Corridor Study was aimed at further regulating this use. One recommendation suggested having a minimum distance separation between new self-storage facilities, which according to the Corridor Study is “the distance a pedestrian will typically walk comfortably within five minutes. This would relieve the sense of proliferation by providing a separation that is consistent with the basic building block of a pedestrian scale environment” (see page 54 of 161 of Attachment 2). For this LDCA and in keeping with the Corridor Study, the proposed language requires a separation of a quarter-mile between new and existing self-storage buildings. A distance waiver may be approved if an adequate supply of neighborhood goods and services are available within a quarter -mile radius of a new facility. The waiver may also be approved for a self -storage facility if at least 25 percent of its gross floor area is dedicated to a different principal use that is permitted in the Community Professional and General Office District (C-1) or Commercial Convenience District (C -2) zoning district. Staff utilized the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) as a guide to determine the appropriate types of principal uses and 16.A.1 Packet Pg. 350 09/10/2019 related intensities that most closely aligns with the desired businesses. One ICSC category, neighborhood center, includes convenience shopping for day-to-day needs with intensities that are less than 125,000 square feet, which generally translates to any permitted use in the C -1 or C-2 zoning district. Both the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and ICSC are recognized resources that staff may use when evaluating market studies in connection with Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments. The geographic area subject to this LDCA does not include the properties located within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area or existing Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), and this LDCA is only applicable to new self-storage buildings that are currently allowed as a permitted use in the C-5 zoning district. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE-LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DSAC-LDR) - RECOMMENDATION: In addition to several other minor changes, on March 21, 2019, the DSAC-LDR voted to recommend approval of the amendment, contingent upon the notification area for the mailed notice be reduced from 1,320 feet to 500 feet. The current language in the LDC reflects this recommendation; however, it was not fully implemented in the proposed language for the administrative code. The administrative code will be updated when the resolution is presented to the Board as a companion item to the LDCA. DSAC - RECOMMENDATION: By a vote of 8-3, on May 1, 2019, the DSAC voted to recommend approval of the amendment. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) - RECOMMENDATION: On May 16, 2019, the CCPC unanimously voted to recommend approval of the amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff anticipates no additional fiscal or operational impact to the County other than the cost to advertise, which is $500. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote is needed to approve the advertising of the LDC amendment, but an affirmative vote of four will be needed to approve the amendment at the advertised public hearing. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to authorize staff to advertise for a public hearing on October 22, 2019, an ordinance amending the Land Development Code related to the creation of separation standards for self-storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport -Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to the recommendations of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study. Prepared By: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Draft Ordinance (PDF) 2. [Linked] Narrative_LDCA_Exhibits (08-01-2019) (PDF) 16.A.1 Packet Pg. 351 09/10/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.A.1 Doc ID: 9225 Item Summary: Recommendation to authorize staff to advertise for a future public hearing, an ordinance amending the Land Development Code related to the creation of separation standards for self- storage buildings on U.S. 41 between the east side of Airport -Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard, pursuant to the recommendations of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study. Meeting Date: 09/10/2019 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Eric Johnson 06/26/2019 10:07 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 06/26/2019 10:07 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 08/08/2019 3:44 PM Zoning Jeremy Frantz Additional Reviewer Completed 08/15/2019 10:31 AM Growth Management Department James C French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 08/18/2019 6:03 PM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 08/21/2019 4:49 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 08/27/2019 5:08 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 08/28/2019 7:31 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 08/28/2019 8:03 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 08/28/2019 8:25 AM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 08/29/2019 8:45 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 09/10/2019 9:00 AM 16.A.1 Packet Pg. 352 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 1 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added ORDINANCE NO. 19 – ___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04- 41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO CREATE A MINIMUM SEPARATION REQUIREMENT OF 1,320 FEET BETWEEN SELF-STORAGE BUILDINGS ON U.S. 41, FROM THE EAST SIDE OF AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD TO THE WEST SIDE OF PRICE STREET/TRIANGLE BOULEVARD, AND TO CREATE A WAIVER PROCESS FROM THE MINIMUM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER ONE – GENERAL PROVISIONS, INCLUDING SECTION 1.08.02 DEFINITIONS; CHAPTER TWO – ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.03 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS; CHAPTER 5 – SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF SECTION 5.05.16, SEPARATION OF SELF-STORAGE BUILDINGS; AND CHAPTER 10 – APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION- MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.03.06 PUBLIC NOTICE AND REQUIRED HEARINGS FOR LAND USE PETITIONS; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20180003473] Recitals WHEREAS, on October 30, 1991, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code (hereinafter LDC), which was subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) on June 22, 2004, adopted Ordinance No. 04-41, which repealed and superseded Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which had an effective date of October 18, 2004; and 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 353 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 2 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Board adopted Resolution 97-177 establishing local requirements and procedures for amending the LDC; and WHEREAS, all requirements of Resolution 97-177 have been met; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, sitting as the land planning agency, did hold an advertised public hearing on May 16, 2019, and reviewed the proposed amendments for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and did recommend approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, in a manner prescribed by law, did hold an advertised public hearing on ________, 2019, and did take action concerning these amendments to the LDC; and WHEREAS, the subject amendments to the LDC are hereby determined by this Board to be consistent with and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan as required by Subsections 163.3194 (1) and 163.3202 (1), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted in compliance with and pursuant to the Community Planning Act (F.S. § 163.3161 et seq.), and F.S. § 125.01(1)(t) and (1)(w); and WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the constitutional and home rule powers of Fla. Const. Art. VIII, § 1(g); and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have otherwise been met. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: RECITALS The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT The Board of Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. Collier County, pursuant to § 163.3161, et seq., F.S., the Florida Community Planning Act (herein after the “Act”), is required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan. 2. After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Act and in particular § 163.3202(1). F.S., mandates that Collier County adopt land development regulations that are consistent with and implement the adopted comprehensive plan. 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 354 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 3 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added 3. Section 163.3201, F.S., provides that it is the intent of the Act that the adoption and enforcement by Collier County of land development regulations for the total unincorporated area shall be based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for, the adopted comprehensive plan. 4. Section 163.3194(1)(b), F.S., requires that all land development regulations enacted or amended by Collier County be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, and any land regulations existing at the time of adoption which are not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, shall be amended so as to be consistent. 5. Section 163.3202(3), F.S., states that the Act shall be construed to encourage the use of innovative land development regulations. 6. On January 10, 1989, Collier County adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan (hereinafter the “Growth Management Plan” or “GMP”) as its comprehensive plan pursuant to the requirements of § 163.3161 et seq., F.S. 7. Section 163.3194(1)(a), F.S., mandates that after a comprehensive plan, or element or portion thereof, has been adopted in conformity with the Act, all development undertaken by, and all actions taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such comprehensive plan or element shall be consistent with such comprehensive plan or element as adopted. 8. Pursuant to § 163.3194(3)(a), F.S., a development order or land development regulation shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, and other aspects of development are compatible with, and further the objectives, policies, land uses, densities, or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government. 9. Section 163.3194(3)(b), F.S., states that a development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the land uses, densities or intensities, capacity or size, timing, and other aspects of development are compatible with, and further the objectives, policies, land uses, densities, or intensities in the comprehensive plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the local government. 10. On October 30, 1991, Collier County adopted the Collier County Land Development Code, which became effective on November 13, 1991. The Land Development Code adopted in Ordinance 91-102 was recodified and superseded by Ordinance 04-41. 11. Collier County finds that the Land Development Code is intended and necessary to preserve and enhance the present advantages that exist in Collier County; to encourage the most appropriate use of land, water and resources consistent with the public interest; to 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 355 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 4 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added overcome present handicaps; and to deal effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within the total unincorporated area of Collier County and it is intended that this Land Development Code preserve, promote, protect and improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience and general welfare of Collier County; to prevent the overcrowding of land and avoid the undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing and other requirements and services; to conserve, develop, utilize and protect natural resources within the jurisdiction of Collier County; to protect human, environmental, social and economic resources; and to maintain through orderly growth and development, the character and stability of present and future land uses and development in Collier County. 12. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County to implement the Land Development Code in accordance with the provisions of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 125, Fla. Stat., and Chapter 163, Fla. Stat., and through these amendments to the Code. SECTION THREE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION 3.A. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1.08.02 DEFINITIONS Section 1.08.02 Definitions, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: 1.08.02 Definitions Self-storage buildings (applicable to LDC Sections 5.05.08 and 5.05.16 only): Buildings where customers lease space to store and retrieve their goods; see NAICS 531130. 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 356 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 5 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added SUBSECTION 3.B. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 2.03.03 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Section 2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts E. Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In addition to the uses provided in the C-4 zoning district, the heavy commercial district (C-5) allows a range of more intensive commercial uses and services which are generally those uses that tend to utilize outdoor space in the conduct of the business. The C-5 district permits heavy commercial services such as full-service automotive repair, and establishments primarily engaged in construction and specialized trade activities such as contractor offices, plumbing, heating and air conditioning services, and similar uses that typically have a need to store construction associated equipment and supplies within an enclosed structure or have showrooms displaying the building material for which they specialize. Outdoor storage yards are permitted with the requirement that such yards are completely enclosed or opaquely screened. The C-5 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for uses and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. 1. The following uses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this section are permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within the heavy commercial district (C-5). a. Permitted uses. 111. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, mini- and self-storage warehousing only), subject to LDC section 5.05.16 for minimum separation requirements between buildings). 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 357 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 6 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added SUBSECTION 3.C. ADDITION OF NEW SECTION 5.05.16 SEPARATION OF SELF-STORAGE BUILDINGS Section 5.05.16 Separation of Self-Storage Buildings, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby added to read as follows: 5.05.16 Separation of Self-Storage Buildings A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to discourage the proliferation of self-storage buildings along the segment of U.S. 41 defined in LDC section 5.05.06 B., in order to maximize or encourage a broad mix of principal uses that will provide goods and services at the neighborhood level to the residents living within or adjacent to the applicable area. B. Applicability. This section shall apply to all new self-storage buildings proposed on real property zoned C-5 and located adjacent to U.S. 41, between the east side of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. All outparcels within shopping centers that are adjacent to U.S. 41 within this area shall be included. This section shall not apply to existing self-storage buildings or self-storage buildings for which a SDP has been approved or a completed SDP application has been filed and accepted as of the effective date of this section. C. Minimum Separation. A new self-storage building shall be located no closer than a quarter-mile (1,320 feet) radius to an existing self-storage building, as measured from property line to property line, unless a waiver to the separation requirement is granted in conformance with LDC section 5.05.16 D. below. D. Waiver of Separation Requirements. 1. The Office of the Hearing Examiner or the BZA may grant a waiver of all or part of the minimum separation requirements of a proposed self-storage building, if either of the following circumstances are met: 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 358 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 7 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added a. Within a quarter-mile (1,320-foot) radius of the proposed self- storage building, there are properties that have existing C-2 uses or are zoned to permit C-2 uses; or b. A minimum of 25 percent of the gross floor area of the proposed self-storage building is dedicated to C-2 uses. 2. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements for a self-storage building distance waiver request. 3. Additional conditions and considerations. The Hearing Examiner or the BZA may add additional conditions to insure compatibility of the self- storage building with the surrounding area or to further the purpose and intent of this section. SUBSECTION 3.D. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 10.03.06 PUBLIC NOTICE AND REQUIRED HEARINGS FOR LAND USE PETITIONS Section 10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Petitions, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.03.06 Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use Petitions Z. Waiver of Separation Requirements for Self-Storage Buildings, pursuant to LDC section 5.05.16. 1. The following advertised public hearing is required: a. One Hearing Examiner hearing or BZA hearing. 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 359 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 8 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added 2. The following notice procedures are required: a. Newspaper Advertisement prior to the advertised public hearing in accordance with F.S. § 125.66. b. Mailed Notice to all property owners within a 500-foot radius prior to the advertised public hearing. SECTION FOUR: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event that any provisions of this ordinance should result in an unresolved conflict with the provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC) or Growth Management Plan (GMP), the applicable provisions of the LDC or GMP shall prevail. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FIVE: INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Land Development Code of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION SIX: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 360 DRAFT 7/30/19 Page 9 of 9 Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ___ day of ______, 2019. ATTEST: BOARDOFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:__________________________ By:________________________________ Deputy Clerk WILLIAM L. MCDANIEL, JR., Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 04-CMD-01077/____ (__/__/19) 16.A.1.a Packet Pg. 361 1 G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\BCC\2019\Sep 10\Separation of Self-Storage Buildings\Word Version and Backup Documents\Narrative_Proposed LDCA (08-01-2019).docx LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT PETITION PL20180003473 SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT This Land Development Code amendment (LDCA) represents the implementation of the Board’s direction to study the proliferation of self - storage facilities on U.S. 41, between the intersection of Palm Street/Commercial Drive and Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED ORIGIN Board of County Commissioners (Board) HEARING DATES Board CCPC DSAC DSAC-LDR 09-24-2019 05-16-2019 05-01-2019 03-21-2019 12-18-2018 1.08.02 2.03.03 5.05.16 10.03.06 Definitions Commercial Zoning Districts Self-Storage Buildings (New Section) Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use Petitions ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS DSAC-LDR Approve with changes DSAC Approve (8 to 3) CCPC Approve BACKGROUND: A segment of the U.S. 41 corridor, generally located between the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Collier Boulevard, has been under much scrutiny in recent years. In April of 2010, the East Naples Foundation completed Vision for the East Trail (“Vision”), which was a privately- initiated planning effort that resulted in the completion of a strategic plan for an approximately 14-mile stretch of the U.S. 41 corridor (see Exhibit A). On December 13, 2016, the Board expressed a concern over certain uses (e.g., self-storage facilities) from proliferating on U.S. 41 in this area of the U.S. 41 corridor. The Board considered adopting a one- year moratorium for all new applications, including self-storage facilities, from developing on the commercial properties along U.S. 41, from the Palm Street/Commercial Drive intersection to the Price Street intersection. However, rather than adopting a moratorium, the Board instead directed staff on February 14, 2017 to begin the process of developing a corridor study with the goal of obtaining community input and creating incentives for the desired development types. In April of 2018, Johnson Engineering, Inc. completed the U.S. 41 Corridor Study-Summary of Findings and Recommendations to the Board (“Corridor Study”) on behalf of the County (see Exhibit F). The length of U.S. 41 that was studied was approximately 6.8 miles, which is shorter than the geographic area used in Vision. The public input portion of the Corridor Study included three stakeholder outreach meetings and four public input meetings. When reviewing image preference surveys, 67 percent of the public outreach meeting respondents did not support self-storage facilities. As such, one of the recommendations of the Corridor Study was aimed at further regulating this use (see pages 23-24 of Exhibit F). The Corridor Study was presented to and accepted by the Board on April 24, 2018 (see Exhibit G). One recommendation suggested having a minimum distance separation between new self- storage facilities, which according to the Corridor Study is “the distance a pedestrian will typically walk 2 G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\BCC\2019\Sep 10\Separation of Self-Storage Buildings\Word Version and Backup Documents\Narrative_Proposed LDCA (08-01-2019).docx comfortable within five minutes. This would relieve the sense of proliferation byproviding a separation that is consistent with the basic building block of a pedestrian scale environment.” For this LDCA and in keeping with the Corridor Study, the proposed language requires a separation of 1,320 feet between new and existing self-storage buildings. A distance waiver may be approved if an adequate supply of neighborhood goods and services are available within a quarter-mile radius of a new facility. A quarter-mile radius is equal to a half-mile diameter—the same width of the study area in Vision, which was chosen, in part, to “evaluate walkabilityin the form of pedestrian sheds.” The waiver may also be approved for a self-storage facility if at least 25 percent of its gross floor area is dedicated to a different principal use that is permitted in the C-1 or C-2 zoning district. Staff utilized the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) as a guide to determine the appropriate types of principal uses and related intensities that most closely aligns with the desired businesses. One ICSC category, neighborhood center, includes convenience shopping for day-to-day needs with intensities that are less than 125,000 square feet, which generally translates to any permitted use in the C-1 or C-2 zoning district. Both the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and ICSC are recognized resources that staff uses when evaluating market studies in connection with Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments (to commercial). The geographic area subject to this LDCA does not include the properties located within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area, and this LDCA is only applicable to new self- storage buildings that are currently allowed as a permitted use in the C-5 zoning district. In addition to several other minor changes, the DSAC-LDR recommended that the mailed notice notification area be reduced from 1,320 feet to 500 feet. The current language for the LDC reflects this recommendation; however, it was not fully implemented in the proposed language for the administrative code. The administrative code will be updated when the resolution is presented to the Board as a companion item to the LDCA. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS Staff anticipates additional fiscal and operational impacts to petitioners requesting a waiver from the minimum distance requirement. GMP CONSISTENCY This LDCA is consistent with the GMP (see Exhibit B). EXHIBITS: A – Defined Area; B – GMP Consistency Memo; C – Email from Public; D - Vision for the East Trail Corridor; E – Collier County Self-Storage Building Map (as of June 11, 2018); F – U.S. 41 Corridor Study—Summary of Findings and Recommendations to the Board; G – Executive Summary and BCC Minutes (04-24-2018); and H – Self Storage Buildings Map (C-4 C-5 PUD). DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 3 G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\BCC\2019\Sep 10\Separation of Self-Storage Buildings\Word Version and Backup Documents\Narrative_Proposed LDCA (08-01-2019).docx Amend the LDC as follows: 1 2 3 1.08.02 Definitions4 5 6 7 Self-storage buildings (applicable to LDC Sections 5.05.08 and 5.05.16 only): Buildings where8 customers lease space to store and retrieve their goods; see NAICS 531130. 9 10 11 12 2.03.03 – Commercial Districts13 14 15 16 E. Heavy Commercial District (C-5). In addition to the uses provided in the C-4 zoning17 district, the heavy commercial district (C-5) allows a range of more intensive commercial18 uses and services which are generally those uses that tend to utilize outdoor space in the19 conduct of the business. The C-5 district permits heavy commercial services such as full-20 service automotive repair, and establishments primarily engaged in construction and21 specialized trade activities such as contractor offices, plumbing, heating and air22 conditioning services, and similar uses that typically have a need to store construction23 associated equipment and supplies within an enclosed structure or have showrooms24 displaying the building material for which they specialize. Outdoor storage yards are25 permitted with the requirement that such yards are completely enclosed or opaquely26 screened. The C-5 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for uses27 and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the28 Collier County GMP. 29 30 1. The followinguses, as identified with a number from the Standard Industrial31 Classification Manual (1987), or as otherwise provided for within this32 section are permissible by right, or as accessory or conditional uses within33 the heavy commercial district (C-5). 34 35 a. Permitted uses. 36 37 38 39 111. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (4225, mini- 40 and self-storage warehousing only), subject to LDC section41 5.05.16 for minimum separation requirements between42 buildings). 43 44 45 DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 4 G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\BCC\2019\Sep 10\Separation of Self-Storage Buildings\Word Version and Backup Documents\Narrative_Proposed LDCA (08-01-2019).docx 1 2 5.05.16 – Separation of Self-Storage Buildings3 4 A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to discourage the proliferation5 of self-storage buildings along the segment of U.S. 41 defined in LDC section6 5.05.06 B., in order to maximize or encourage a broad mix of principal uses that7 will provide goods and services at the neighborhood level to the residents living8 within or adjacent to the applicable area. 9 10 B. Applicability. This section shall apply to all new self-storage buildings proposed11 on real property zoned C-5 and located adjacent to U.S. 41, between the east side12 of Airport-Pulling Road to the west side of Price Street/Triangle Boulevard. All13 outparcels within shopping centers that are adjacent to U.S. 41 within this area14 shall be included. This section shall not apply to existing self-storage buildings or15 self-storage buildings for which a SDP has been approved or a completed SDP16 application has been filed and accepted as of the effective date of this section. 17 18 C. Minimum Separation. A new self-storage building shall be located no closer than19 a quarter-mile (1,320 feet) radius to an existing self-storage building, as measured20 from property line to property line, unless a waiver to the separation requiremen t21 is granted in conformance with LDC section 5.05.16 D. below. 22 23 D. Waiver of Separation Requirements. 24 25 1. The Office of the Hearing Examiner or the BZA may grant a waiver of all or26 part of the minimum separation requirements of a proposed self -storage27 building, if either of the following circumstances are met: 28 29 a. Within a quarter-mile (1,320-foot) radius of the proposed self-30 storage building, there are properties that have existing C-2 uses or31 are zoned to permit C-2 uses; or32 33 b. A minimum of 25 percent of the gross floor area of the proposed34 self-storage building is dedicated to C-2 uses. 35 36 2. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements for a37 self-storage building distance waiver request. 38 39 3. Additional conditions and considerations. The Hearing Examiner or the40 BZA may add additional conditions to insure compatibility of the self-41 storage building with the surrounding area or to further the purpose and42 intent of this section. 43 44 45 46 DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted 5 G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\BCC\2019\Sep 10\Separation of Self-Storage Buildings\Word Version and Backup Documents\Narrative_Proposed LDCA (08-01-2019).docx 10.03.06 – Public Notice and Required Hearings for Land Use Petitions1 2 3 4 Z. Waiver of Separation Requirements for Self-Storage Buildings, pursuant to LDC5 section 5.05.16. 6 7 1. The following advertised public hearing is required: 8 9 a. One Hearing Examiner hearing or BZA hearing. 10 11 2. The following notice procedures are required: 12 13 a. Newspaper Advertisement prior to the advertised public hearing in14 accordance with F.S. § 125.66. 15 16 b. Mailed Notice to all property owners within a 500-foot radius prior17 to the advertised public hearing. 18 19 20 5 t h A V E S Bayshore DRTa miami T RL E Collier BLVDDavis BLVDCollier BLVDBayshore DRTamiami TRL E Davis BLVD Ta mia mi T R LE Ta mia mi TR L EDavisB LV DDavis BLVD Ta mia mi T R L E Tho ma s son DRCollier BLVDDavis BLVDThomasson DRTamiamiTRLE DavisBLVD Collier BLVDCollier BLVDCounty BarnRDDavisBLVD 5thAVES SantaBarbaraBLVDCollier BLVDDavis BLV DDavis BLVD Tamiami TRL E Tamiami TRL E Tamiami TRL ETa mia mi T R L E Rattlesnake Hammock RD Collier BLVDTa mia mi T R L E Collier BLVDSanta Barbara BLVDCounty Barn RDCollier BLVDCollier BLVDHardee STDocument Path: M:\GIS_R equests\ 2018\12-Dec\LDC Exhibit\MXD\LDC _ Exhi bit.mxd U.S 41 Stud y A rea(Palm STtoPriceST)StudyAre a L im its Map Date: 12/20 / 2018 Growth Ma nage ment De partme ntOperations & Re gulato 1 Growth Management Department Zoning Division Memorandum To: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Land Development Code Section From: David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: April 9, 2019 Subject: Growth Management Plan (GMP) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: LDCA-PL20180003473 REV:5 PETITION NAME: LDC Sec. 1.08.02, 2.03.03 & 5.05.16, Self-Storage Facilities REQUEST: Amend the Collier County Land Development Code Sections 1.08.02 Definitions, and 2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts, and add new Sec. 5.05.16, Self-Storage Facilities, to: 1. Add to the definition of “self-storage buildings” and add reference to new Sec. 5.05.16. 2. Add reference to new Sec. 5.05.16 within the C-5, Heavy Commercial, District. 3. Establish new Sec. 5.05.16 Separation of Self-Storage Facilities. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The Growth Management Plan’s (GMP) land use elements (Future Land Use Element, Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Immokalee Area Master Plan) contain subdistricts and overlays that identify allowable uses; some of these identify uses by zoning district(s) and some by specific use names (e.g. liquor store) or use categories (e.g. retail commercial). These subdistricts and overlays are implemented through the Land Development Code (LDC), which may be by establishing a zoning overlay, or a rezone of a property, or a conditional use on a property. The GMP does not contain a definition of self-storage facilities, and does not contain, or prohibit, separation requirements for self-storage facilities; there is no specificity provided that would conflict with the proposed amendment. The LDC may be more restrictive than the GMP but not less restrictive. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed LDC amendment may be deemed consistent with the GMP. IN CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Zoning Director LDCA-PL20180003473 Sec. 5.05.16 et al_self-storage separationR5 G:\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2019\LDCA dw/4-9-19 1 JohnsonEric From:Michael Fernandez <mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 12, 2018 9:29 AM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Terri Fernandez; FrantzJeremy Subject:RE: Land Development Code Amendments Update Good morning Eric, Just a couple of comments / input relative to the self storage separation standards proposed. 1. It appears that facility and buildings are used interchangeably. Facilities can be of one or numerous number of buildings. Recommend you use facilities and eliminate the term buildings from this provision. 2. The intent is to limit and provide separation of facilities. This should not preclude expansion of existing facilities which is more desirable as it addresses demand without the need for additional new facilities. Therefore recommend that you exempt enlargements of existing facilities which have been considered or will be considered / evaluated through a public hearing process; such as a PUD or Conditional Use. a. A PUD may have remaining capacity b. An expansion or enlargement which proposes additional acreage for the expansion will still need to go through the Conditional Use process. 3. It was unclear how the proposed LDC amendment addresses existing approvals relative to new proposed locations. Is the separation only measured between existing facilities or does it recognize existing zoning such as PUDs and Conditional Uses. Relative to PUDs, these districts typically have a varied list of permitting uses which may or may not be realized. a. Not sure, but does Sabal Bay PUD support storage? b. Others? c. I believe the PUD at the southeast corner of US 41 East and Southwest Blvd supports storage. d. It is interesting to see in plan where zoning already supports storage Are these areas grandfathered-in? 4. As you may recall, we are presently working on a self-storage facility – which just started construction on the East Trail and is permitting under a Conditional Use approval. a. There is vacant parcels to the west which are very small and due to their size and geometry (limited depth and frontage and setback due to frontage canal) are not good candidates for retail or services and access is an issue. These lots are good candidates for the expansion of the storage facility under construction should it be successful and would be most compatible with the neighborhood and would no require an additional access from US 41; and would be low traffic generator. 1. It has since been suggested by nearby neighbors that the facility should expand over these lots. b. How would the proposed LDC provision address these considerations? I assume that a CU or a CU amendment would be required to permit the expansion? I will look forward to your feedback on these suggested revisions to the draft LDC amendments. Please do not hesitate to call or to schedule a meeting should you wish to further discuss. Regards, Michael Michael R. Fernandez, AICP RA Architect / President PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INC Development Consultants, Architects, Engineers, and Planners 704 Goodlette Road, Suite 240, Naples, Florida 34102 239) 263.6934; (877) 263-0535 fax mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com 2 From: FrantzJeremy <Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 8:35 AM To: Michael Fernandez <mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com> Cc: Terri Fernandez <tfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com>; JohnsonEric <Eric.Johnson@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Land Development Code Amendments Update Hi Michael, Eric Johnson is the lead on that amendment. Eric.Johnson@colliercountyfl.gov 239-252-2931 Respectfully, Jeremy Frantz, AICP Land Development Code Manager From: Michael Fernandez <mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:37 PM To: FrantzJeremy <Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Terri Fernandez <tfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com> Subject: RE: Land Development Code Amendments Update Jeremy, To whom should our input on the proposed self storage facility separation text be addressed/direct to? Regards, Michael Michael R. Fernandez, AICP RA Architect / President PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INC Development Consultants, Architects, Engineers, and Planners 704 Goodlette Road, Suite 240, Naples, Florida 34102 239) 263.6934; (877) 263-0535 fax mfernandez@planningdevelopmentinc.com From: FrantzJeremy <Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:24 PM To: FrantzJeremy <Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Land Development Code Amendments Update 3 LDC Amendments Update Meeting Schedule Current Amendments Collier LDC News Releases Upcoming Public Meeting for Proposed Amendments to the LDC and the Administrative Code The Development Services Advisory Committee Land Development Review (DSAC-LDR) Subcommittee will review proposed amendments to the LDC and the Administrative Code Date & Location Tuesday December 18, 2018 2:00 PM Location 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Collier County Development Services Building Conference Room 609/610 Review: Agenda Meeting Materials We welcome your attendance and feedback. Contact Us 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive | Naples, FL 34014 Call: (239) 252-2305 | Email: jeremy.frantz@colliercountyfl.gov Not interested in e-mail updates? Unsubscribe from this list. 4 Ellen Summers Senior Planner Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 239.252.1032 www.colliergov.net/ldcamendments Exceeding Expectations Everyday Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Respectfully, Jeremy Frantz, AICP Land Development Code Manager Zoning Division Exceeding Expectations Everyday 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.2305 www.colliergov.net/ldcamendments Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. itVlJ Office of the County Manager Leo E. Ochs, Jr. 3299 Tamiami Trail East. Suite 202. Naples Florida 34112.5746' (239) 252-8383' FAX: (239) 252-4010 April 1, 2011 Ms. Laura Dejohn Johnson Engineering 4915 Rattlesnake Hammock Road #214 Naples FL 34113 Re: Public Petition from Ms. Laura Dejohn of Johnson Engineering representing the East Naples Foundation requesting coordination of efforts with the County. Dear Ms. Dejohn, Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County 80ard of Commissioners at the meeting of April 12, 2011, regarding the above referenced subject. Your petition to the 80ard of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes. Please be advised that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting. However, your petition may be placed on a future agenda for consideration at the 80ard's discretion. If the subject matter is currently under litigation or is an on-going Code Enforcement case, the 80ard will hear the item but will not discuss the item after it has been presented. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise them of your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W. Harmon Turner 8uilding (8uilding "F") of the government complex. Please arrange to be present at this meeting and to respond to inquiries by Board members. If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. SincerelY;L ~;=, d- effield 8usiness Operations Manager MJS:mjb cc: Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Norman Feder, Administrator, Growth Management Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, Growth Management Packet Page -40- n'''\'''..... 4/12/2011 Item B.C. Request to Speak under Public Petition Please print Name: East Naples Foundation(ENF)/ Power Point Presentation by Laura DeJohn of Johnson EnQineerina (JE) representinQ the ENF. Address: 4915 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd # 214, Naples, FL 34113 Phone: Jim Pusateri. ENF Pres. 239-775-7029/ Karen Homiak. ENF Treas. 239-774-4264 Laura DeJohn. JE 239-280-4331 Date of the Board Meeting you wish to speak: April 12, 2011 Must circle yes or no: Is this subject matter under litigation at this time?Ves I ffiil Is this subject matter an ongoing Code Enforcement case? Ves IINol Note: If either answer is "yes", the Board will hear the item but will have no discussion regarding the item after it is presented. Iease explain in detail the reason you are requesting to speak (attach additional page if necessary): Back UP - East Trail Vision Booklet The East Naples Foundation. a 501 (c) (3) non-profit orQanization, needs fundina to complete the community plannina exercise it has undertaken for the followinQ purpose: To develop a Master Plan for the East Trail Corridor which will encouraae planned arowth, both commercial and residential. that is compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resultinQ in an enhanced auality of life for all residents. Please explain in detail the action you are asking the Commission to take (attach additional page if necessary): Back UP - ENF brochure out/inina reauest. Our request is for the BCC to direct appropriate staff to coordinate with the ENF President on a partnerina strateay to seek plannina arants as they may come available for aovernment entities or aovernmentlnon-profit partnerships. Upon establishina a partnerina strateay with staff, we'd return to the BCC for approval of the strateay - in which we'd define who will participate on the County's behalf, what the County's and ENF's roles will be. and how the arant-seekina and arant application activities would be manaaed. C:\Documents and Settings\hetzeU\Deslctop\public petition.doc Packet Page -41- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 6.C. Item Summary: Public Petition from Ms. Laura Dejohn of Johnson Engineering representing the East Naples Foundation requesting coordination of efforts with the County. Meeting Date: 4/12/2011 Prepared By Name: BrockMaryJo Title: Executive Secretary to County Manager, CMO 4/5/20] 1 8:51:46 AM Submitted by Title: Executive Secretary to County Manager, CMO Name: BrockMary.To 4/5/20118:51:47 AM Approved By Name: SheffieldMichael Title: Manager-Business Operations, CMO Date: 4/5/2011 9:30:03 AM Packet Page -42- ctg2CL1c l'll0IIIOl'llCLIU.U U, .'CLI ~....EocI- III CLI,ECLI'tlIII0 ""iiil'll lJ iii CLI, ;W..c....'CLI....~=cO....l'llal'll..C0O.cCLI-CL12"~c: .. C-en~OCLI'tlCLI>-CU.c:!:: ....,a::: l'll C..c l'll C....~ c l'll"- cr l'llii=='tl CoCLICLICLI g en:i:i lJ CLI l'll"- C l'll CLI~ l'll..c tlOCoCuEQI coc CLI u l'll ot:CLIenCCC Co c C l'll CLI tl C In l\la V>l~~a ~"..s I w'r#~~: ~' i;;~' -,o'L~ 0~,(0.'lt ~iiii~':1":0,,""" -"'~f- 'U ~Jc''''sfO.' c'."':"":'r.!)".,f/) iF'"t;!b'~ .,,,i"j ucl.,:.10Col"" 8M:!@ P^i8J.'1I0::J,",C1l III10'S <30f-.- 8-- "e)"";'""- l: n: tl"..~: l'; i,,~ 2 .~ ,""" C;..S::' t. l'J:; C: .~:"'- z i Ii. I . i U,,'\ f~' Z'r""'"' w'<t a: Vl a::J o~ a: 0'1 a: a: au u z 1.<""'.) Go"^}'"Of H"'-OO I i Ii i ~ 5 1- l-' ii' i, otJ I,N" ^"jOOO vi' ClJ 0. t> J C Z U") 0 c ClJ E 0. o ill ClJ u 1:' s o c. co t> Ll.J ClJ co J u i 0 J~ S 3 ClJ co C 1 ~ u VI ClJ J <t> J ~ ~ J t:..!:: ro o C:i S 01 1.J > V'l ro ClJ mus ~ c 8 0 ro ro u:r:: u Vl 1) ..- -0 0l :::- n.. 0 J C 1'0 .- l rn-::: l 0 0 0 U OJ..t:J f) ClJ tn..c 1)- O'l J1 ;2 .~ .w s ~ c Q} tj OJ O..c VI :- 0 VI U 0 ...... () o C<..;-.... J <t> o "..;:::; U ~ ClJ ~ o 0. 0 C LU C > c0co :JClJco0UUt> ClJ U ClJClJJuUt> 0 .c. ..Q :Jt> U0. .-Ll.J o S c !='co <t> is.co ClJ coClJc. S :JC ~ co ..QJCcoUU0 ~0 CC C :JUEc <t> 0ClJ00 -'" ~ ucClJC4- V> ~ 'u <t>0 <t> ClJ "-ClJ .c. ~ CCUco4- ~U >, <t> ClJ ClJClJC ~ ~ 1:' ~ ~t> C co <t>J co 0 <t> 0.0. 0 ClJ E ~ 1:'ClJuu 0. ClJ 0.u ClJ <t> ClJ .c.t> ~ Z > ~ ClJ 9! ~ ~co ~ <t> 1:: u co cot> U ~U ClJ Ll.J <t> ClJ C0 ~ S0 ClJ C ~ ~ ~ ClJE0c '" co U U0. co ClJ 'uCClJ > c t> > .~ C ClJClJu0E c:::: >, ClJ ClJ u <t> c:::c -:;: 0 ..Q B u ucClJ0 :J ClJ u.J ClJ S 0:: 0cou <t> aJ ClJ <l:: S ..Q 0..: Ll.J ~ J:: co ~ ClJ 0:: t> . c. 0 <l:: l- S ~ ~ co Ll.J w ;; i=- UJ~) ~~ T ~ 0:: S J) ~ ~ 6: J S ~ o 0 [-J 0 !tl z w n:# Om 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor Table of Contents Introduction Master Plan Study Process Context 3 History Land Use Characteristics Circulation Population Characteristics Neighborhoods and Housing Conditions Economic Conditions and Trends Environmental Characteristics Past Planning Efforts East Trail Visioning Process 10 Public Involvement Applicable Planning Principles The East Trail Vision Statement 14 Goals & Stratcgics Attachment: Vision Concept Plan Appendix: Demographic page ti-om Economic Dcvelopment Council of Collier County's "Market Facts 2008-2009" Public Input Meeting documents Packet Page -46- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor 1~ The East Naples Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is continuing the community project initiated by the East Naples Civic Association's Strategic Planning Committee. This project is an endeavor to create a plan to promote planned growth for the future of the "East Trail" (Tamiami Trail East I U.S. 41 East) corridor in Collier County. The East Naples Foundation enVISIOns development along the East Trail over time according to a community based master plan. This is not about the road itself. This effort is not an evaluation of how many lanes or how much asphalt should be poured on US 41. This vision for the future focuses on the property, the buildings, and the features along the East Trail. These features will ultimately be developed and redeveloped in a way that either contributes to or detracts from a sense of identity, character, place and functionality for the people who live along and travel the corridor. The Study Area is a stretch of approximately 14 miles beginning at Airport Pulling Road adjacent to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Areal to County Road 92. The Study Area covers a long distance of roadway with varied characteristics and multiple functions serving both travelers and neighbors. The functions of the corridor span the spectrum, from the northernmost portions that can serve as a "main street" for established communities in East Naples, to the southernmost portion that is a scenic route through the Collier-Seminole State Park and rural agricultural lands. The future character of the corridor will be dictated over the next twenty years as many currently developed sites reach the end of their structural and functional lives, and many undeveloped lands face development pressure. The East Naples Foundation identifies the need to focus the activity, growth and opportunities of the corridor in a way that best and most efficiently serve the people living, working, owning land, or doing business along the East Trail corridor. The East Naples Foundation has undertaken this planning effort for the following purpose: To develop a Master Plan for the U.S. 41 Tamiami Trail corridor which will encourage planned growth, both commercial and residential, that is compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resulting in an enhanced quality of life for all residents. I The East Trail Corridor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (eRA) boundary, however the recommendations of this Vision for the East Trail Corridor are only for lands outside of the eRA boundary. Any reference to property within the eRA. boundary is only conceptual in nature, and is not intended to alter or vary from the eRA' s Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future development within the CR.^-. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 I Packet Page -47- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor Master Plan Study Process The objective of this master planning effort is to anticipate, plan and identifY adjustments to regulatory framework so that the East Trail corridor grows viably while protecting quality of life. Current conditions have been documented and analyzed. Community interests have been defined and prioritized in this Vision for the future. This Vision will ultimately be translated into a master plan document complete with goals, policies, and implementation mechanisms that ensure sustained adherence to principles of the plan. The following outline provides the detailed steps of this master planning effort. Steps I and 2 have already been completed. This Vision document fulfills Step 3. 1. Existing Conditions Inventory - Professional planners, engineers and ecologists collected, tabulated, and mapped existing conditions along the corridor, including: corridor boundaries, land use, zoning, utilities, drainage, transportation, demographics, and design characteristics. 2. Public Workshop - A meeting was held March 30, 2009 to display collected data and solicit input from the community and stakeholders to identifY the area's strengths and weaknesses, Iikcs and dislikes, and desires for the future. 3, Vision - Professional planning consultants prioritize the goals and objectives of the community within the framework of existing conditions and potential for the future. The vision is embodied in a statement document and an image that conveys both the concept for the development of the corridor and the illustration of the segments, gateways, nodes, opportunities and constraints along the corridor. 4. East Trail Plan - This plan documcnt will outlinc the goals, objectives and policics that providc a framework f()r thc developmcnt community and the public agcncies to achicve an outcome consistent with thc vision for the corridor. The East Trail Plan will provide thc following: background data and analysis, and guidelines for planned transportation, land use and urban dcsign c1cmcnts. The Plan will also identify nccessary improvements and rccommcnded mcthods and criteria to achieve thc desired results. Recommendcd methods may includc: inccntivcs, pcrfonnance standards, f0n11 based codcs or new developmcnt standards. 5. Public Input - A sccond meeting will be held with thc community and stakeholdcrs to gathcr input and answer qucstions related to the draft Corridor Plan. 6. Adoption - Collier County staff, Advisory Boards and Commissioners must review and consider the Plan for adoption. 7. Implementation - After the Plan is adopted, the implementation of the plan may involve: Growth Management Plan amcndmcnts. such as new Future Land Use designations, overlays or commcrcial location cliteria; Land Development Code amendments, such as new zoning districts or ovcrlays; capital improvement plan updates; new funding strategies; and new public outrcach strategies or programs. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 2 Packet Page -48- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor History of the Tamiami Trail," Authority of the Tamiami Trail Commissioners and the County Commissioners of Dade County, Florida, t928. HistOlY Opened in ] 928, the Tamiami Trail has long provided a critical connection for the State of Florida, from Tampa to Miami. The importance of this route as a state connector has been overtaken by newer highway improvements to Interstate 75 that is now the high capacity route connecting the Fort Lauderdale area to Tampa and points nOJih. Much of the Tamiami Trail that runs along the west coast now functions as an aJierial roadway running through urban and suburban areas. Cities along the west coast have made efforts to redefine the arterial roadway to better fit their communities. These communities have found through traffic studies that the T amiami Trail is often utilized more for local trips rather than long distance trips. This means the Trail corridor should develop with local contcxt and character similar to a "main street" rather than a throughway in an urbanized area. Other portions of the Trail are much more scenic, where the landscape stretches for miles over agricultw-al lands, the Everglades, and other protected parklands. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 3 Packet Page -49- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor ri'; r-;:; :' e." 0'/" 0., ~::, .,~,_,;'.-'~. V" f.;;;;<,. Land Use Characteristics The development along Collier County's East Trail from Airport Road to County Road 92 is a reflection of a wide range of land uses. The Study Area dcfined for this East Trail Master Plan Study begins to thc northwest at the intersection of Airport Road and the East Trail, where the Collier County Govemment Complex is located. The southeastern tcmlinus of the Study Arca is the intersection of County Road 92 and thc East Trail, where the Collicr-Seminole State Park begins. Due to the geographic extent of the l4-mile stretch of the Study Area, the area has been divided into four Se6'111ents, depicted on the attached Vision Concept Plan. All the segment lines do not cOlTespond with major roadways because the segments were divided according to transitions in land usc patterns. Segment 1 is approximately 2 miles between Airport Pulling Road and Valley Stream Drive. Segment I includes Lake Avalon and the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 4 Packet Page -50- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor Segment 2 is approximately 2.5 miles, from Valley Stream Drive to Navajo Trail. Segment 2 contains mostly developed or planned residential neighborhoods including Sabal Bay, Lely Country Club, Naples Manor, Treviso Bay, and Whistler's Cove. Segment 3 is approximately 3.5 miles, from Navajo Trail to Naples Reserve Boulevard. Segment 3 includes Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, the C.R. 951 intersection, and the new Super WalMart. Segment 4 is the longest segment, measuring approximately 6 miles, from Naples Reserve Boulevard to County Road 92. This includes Reflection Lakes, Fiddlers Creek, Six Ls Farm and Collier Seminole State Park. The corridor is characterized by the established neighborhoods of East Naples, which gradually transition to the southeast to more golf course communities and suburban and rural style development. ln Se6'1nents 1 and 2 the commercial property along the East Trail was limited in size after the widening of US 41, so that much of the commercial land in these se6'111ents is underutilized. The corridor is bisected by the intersection at County Road 951. This intersection is an important crossroads because County Road 951 connects Naples to Marco Island going south, and connects to the 1-75 interchange going north. The intersection is developing with commercial shopping centers and big box retailers. Moving to the southeast, the development along the corridor becomes more sparse, with some suburban neighborhoods and more rural and agricultural lands. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. For this planning effort, the Study Area has been limited to properties along the East Trail within a half-mile distance from the centerline of the Trail. This half-mile dimension allows our study to encompass parks and schools that are in close proximity and are important to the corridor. The half-mile dimension also allows us to represent and evaluate walkability in the fonn of pedestrian sheds. Jolmson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 5 Packet Page -51- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor OAVI~flL':D s ~"" I-~ ESTEY AVE Du~ 1"lo<'$11l<' 51..U~") Ccnuner:::ia1 Re~idenrial 348.76 659.38 32.S1% 62.0300 TotalA::reL 1063.03 100% il r:.J j!.:.... RqT ...EnM,<:t HAMV\:JC,", I AMENDED. JA.NUARY ~5. 20(,7 I . _~~~o ~~B}__~ 1j] C.l';.O.::, :.f-J,'3 Miles 1;'::.::;-:;:::"::.:....,. c::J. ~.,.,_..."',,:~_,.r,_, n.....<. TR-4 South U.S 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Areo (TCEA)1.."........> C"..".'...".H.x~.". 10-,',"";:'~ Circulation The East Trail is a signitlcant artcrial roadway that scrves the East Naples community. The predominant mode of travel is by automobile. although the East Trail cOlTidor has opportunities for alternative modes as well. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) labels the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north into the City of Naples as a '"Congested Con-idor." The Collier County Growth Management Plan delineates the U.S. 41 Transportation Concun-ency Exception Area TCEA) at the northwest p0l1ion of the East Trail trom Rattlesnakc Hammock Road and north to Davis Boulcvard. This dcsignation is established pursuant to FlOlida law in rccognition of communities who adopt strategies for Urban Infill and Urban Redcvelopment. This area of the East Trail is granted exceptions from traftic concurrency because a varicty of uses are in closc proximity, and provisions for altcrnatives to auto-only circulation are availablc. Such alternatives include: bike racks, bus stops, mixed use devclopmcnt, and sidewalks. which are considered appropriate sol utions to congested conditions. Alternative modes exist and are planned for cxpansion along the corridor. The Collier Area Transit service has bus routes j1-0111 the northwestern extent of the Study Area to Greenway Road, and a future transit route is proposed to extend south to C .R. 92. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 6 Packet Page -52- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Visionfor the East Trail Corridor Sidewalks are primarily located within the East Trail right-of-way from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to Naples Manor subdivision. Pathways are proposed to extend from C.R. 951 south in the future. Bike lanes are primarily located within the corridor from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to the Rattlesnake Hammock intersection. Bike lanes are proposed extending south from C.R. 951 in the future. Population Characteristics Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Department delineates planning communities and generates population figures for each area. The planning communities that relate to the East Trail corridor are the East Naples, South Naples and Royal Fakapalm planning communities. The County's statistics project population growth from 68,724 people in 2008 to 98,876 people in 2020, constituting an increase of 30,152 residents (an increase of 44%). The figures show small growth of population in East Naples (northeastern. portion of the corridor), an increase of 51% in South Naples (central portion of the corridor) and growth that nearly doubles the population in the outlying Royal Fakapalm area. from Economic Development Council of Collier County's "Market Facts 2008-2009" SO""C!: C::.!her::-....n-y C~n'nreh~n:;t'''! P :J'""l""":J ::~Far:n;~....~, P_e'.,i~e::: c..:os The 2000 Census data for Census Tracts adjacent to the East Trail corridor indicates a median household income of $39,405 for this area, which slightly exceeded the State of Florida's median household income of$38,819. Neighborhood and Housing Conditions The East Trail is a community of many neighborhoods. Older established neighborhoods are located at the nOlihwestern pOliion of the corridor. proximate to many community facilities. From Rattlesnake Hammock Road and south, eXlstmg and planned large golf course communities are the predominant neighborhood type, with the exception of some established single family subdivisions including Naples Manor. Housing characteristics range from older single family structures in established neighborhoods, to newer single and multifamily structures in the gated and golf course communities. A cross section of the community is served, from entry level housing to luxury estates. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 7 Packet Page -53- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor South of C.R. 951, single family developments have been approved and developed along side established larger tract subdivisions that accommodate rural single family homes and some mobile homcs. Fiddlers Creek is a large community permitted for residential development along an extensive section of this pmi of the corridor. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area desil,'Ilated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. Economic Conditions and Trcnds After years of dramatic economic growth through the last decade, economic conditions have deteriorated for the country, the state, and particularly southwest Florida. Housing and construction were primary economic drivers for this area throughout the past decade, and the housing market has been in sharp decline since reaching its peak in 2005. Development projects that were approvcd in recent years are facing financial difficulty as homebuying lags behind market supply. With the drop in homebuying and consumer spending, the commercial development supporting rcsidential areas along thc East Trail has also suffered decline. Busincsses have closed and some new commercial devclopments remain unoccupied. Economists indicate the outlook is a slow, steady recovery over the next several years. With thc development of a ncw hospital on County Road 951 near Rattlesnake Hammock Road, along with thc County Governmcnt Center that will cndure as a major workplace, the East Trail con'idor is an arc a that can continue to attract new residents and suppOli ncw business if properly planncd. Em'irolllllcntal Charactcristics Beyond the most urban portions of thc cOlTidor. arcas sU1T(mnding the East Trail arc rich in environmcntal quality. Sugden Park and Eagle Lakes Park provide a glimpse of the natural features for the residents to enjoy in the more developed areas of the corridor. The Collicr-Seminolc State Park at the southeastern tenninus of the corridor is a large protected natural area. South and cast of the Study arca are Panther Zones designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collier County's cnvironmental policies and standards havc govemed the development of subdivisions built over the past 10-15 years so that significant native vegetation is preserved and maintained in perpetuity. Such environmental regulations shall continue to be observed and followed as the corridor dcvclops, with a focus on avoiding impacts to wetlands and critical habitat for protected specIes. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 8 Packet Page -54- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor Past Planning efforts The Community Character Plan for Collier County ("Character Plan") was completed in 2001. The Character Plan set forth goals and implementation steps to redefine centers of activity and quality neighborhoods throughout the County. The Character Plan identified the need to focus on building human scale settings rather than auto-oriented, single use developments. The Plan illustrated photos that were ranked as the least appealing images of Collier County according to a public image survey. As shown below, all three of the lowest ranking photos were taken in East Naples. The Character Plan also included a conceptual design study of the Naples Town Center shopping center, showing how infill development could revitalize the declining strip mall as a mixed use center of activity. The Character Plan put forth valuable plarming strategies and implementation steps to promote quality design of the built environment in Collier County. Only a few of the recommendations have resulted in new policies or techniques applied in the processing of development projects. Isle of Capri Road Tamiami Trail East Naples Town Center The three lowest rated images from the Community Character Plan for Collier County Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 Packet Page -55- 9 4/12/2011 Item S.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor ad &r-roAi "O~ g>"oc~~ Per Florida Statutes Section 163.3177 (13), local governments are encouraged to develop a community vision that provides for sustainable growth, recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. The stakeholders along the East Trail corridor realize that their future must be planned according to a vision that directs !,'Towth in an orderly manner in appropriate locations. This visioning process for the East Trail incorporates public involvement and applicable planning principles to arrive at a vision concept plan and a vision statement with supporting goals and strategies to direct future development along the corridor. Public Involvement A Public Input Meeting was held on March 30, 2009 to survey the priority issues of property owners and residents along the East Trail corridor. Property owners adjacent to the East Trail and neighborhood associations adjacent to the Study Area wcre notified of thc meeting by mail, and it was advertised in the Collier Citizen newspapcr. An Image Preference Survey was conducted with approximately 40 meeting attendees. Thc Image Preference Survey consisted of 40 picturcs takcn both along the East Trail and in other areas of Collier and Lee Counties. Pictures ranged Ii-om rural scenic vicws to urban hardscapes. The results of the Image Preferencc Survey revcalcd that the most favored llnagcs were wcll landscaped semi urban and suburban scenes, as illustrated to the right and below. h~i~;' Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 20] 0 10 Packet Page -56- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor The images that were ranked as least favorable during the Image Survey are depicted below. These images portray auto-oriented uses along roadways that are characteristic of sprawl-like development. Meeting attendees also answered individual questionnaires about their likes, dislikes and vision for the East Trail's future. The issues most commented on by meeting attendees concerned: I. Development types (preferences for types of businesses and communities) 2. Aesthetic issues (appearance of roadsides and buildings) 3. Traffic (safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians) Other comments rcccived relatcd to recreation, natural resources, community services, and public safety. For the final phase of the Public Input Meeting, attendees divided into workgroups of four to eight participants. The workgroups focused on one of the four segments of the corridor. The participants identified positives, negatives, and future goals for each segment. The results of this exercise revealed that top priorities for all groups were related to development types and aesthetics. Less noted were the other issues of connectivity, natural resources, recrcation and public safety. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 II Packet Page -57- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor Applicable Planning Principles Using the available data and priorities from the perspective of stakeholders along the corridor, it is evident that a continuation of the past development patterns for twenty more years into the future will not bring about desirable results. Today's struggling commercial strip centers, disconnected neighborhoods, and automobile oriented buildings and uses are not the tools for successful community development in the future. The spread of suburban development sprawling into rural areas is a pattern the Florida Legislature has identified as a problem for communities throughout the state. As a result, Florida Statutes are designed to control growth management policy or land use changes that result in low density, single use development in the countryside that constitutes sprawl. The Transect The existing characteristics, development patterns and context of the East Trail correspond to a planning model known as the Rural-Urban Transect. A transect, in its origins (Von Humboldt 1790), is a geographical cross- seetion of a region used to reveal a sequence of environments. Originally, it was used to anaZvze natural ecologies, sho",'ing vmying characteristics through different zones sueh as shores. wetlands, plains. and uplands. For human environments, sueh a cross-section can be used to identifY a set of habitats that vmy by their level and intensity of urban character, a continuum that ranges fmm !'liral to urban. /n Transect planning, this range of cln'ironmcnts is the hasis .for organi:::hlg the components of urbanism: building. lot. land lise. street, and all of the a/her physical elements o(the human hahi/at. mlre:'. Duany, et al. S/liur/Code & Manual Iiami: New Lrnan Publications, Inc. 2()()5). The Rural-Urban Transect is a tool that helps us understand and govern the development of communities. The Rural-Crban Transect defines the segments of a community from its most intense "urban core" where the highest density and building heights exist, to the moderately dense "urban center," the less dense "general urban" transect, the more spacious "suburban" transect. the wooded and agricultural "rural" transect, and the natural" transect consisting of unaltered landscape. In The Lexicon of the New Urbanism published by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, land use, building types, and design standards are applied to each transect to establish human scale and sustainable development patterns appropriate for the context of each area. The East Trail currently incorporates a full range of urban to rural characteristics starting at the County Government Complex at the Airp0l1 Road intersection, extending to Collier-Seminole State Park at the County Road 92 intersection. Using the Rural-Urban Transect typology as a guide to manage future growth along the corridor, the design of a vision for tbe future of the East Trail takes shape. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 12 Packet Page -58- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor In order to fulfill the orderly development pattern of the Rural-Urban Transect model, the areas along the East Trail Corridor must be designated with appropriate Transects of Urban Center, General Urban, Suburban, Rural and Natural. Urban Core is not recommended for the East Trail corridor, because Urban Core would be typical of a city center which does not correspond to any portion of the East Trail. Centers Along with the Transect designations and related development standards that would be applied to accomplish appropriate scale and style of development relative to location along the corridor, a system of centers or nodes can be designated as concentrations of activity. The Growth Management Plan already applies the principle of centers in the form of Activity Centers located at major road intersections. The Community Character Plan for Collier County sought to advance the concept of centers to be more than commercial nodes. The Character Plan suggests convenient centers should offer the following: quality experiences; diversity of uses, including retail, workplaces, housing, and community facilities; and building types that are durable and flexible to be functional as markets change. The centers should be scaled consistent with the Transect model, so that intensity and design of the center relates to the intensity and design of the surrounding area. Centers put forth in the Character Plan that would be appropriate along the East Trail corridor range in type and scale from town centers, neighborhood centers, village centers, hamlets, and rural crossroads. Mobilitv The third planning principle that relates to the corridor characteristics and public priorities is mobility planning. The concept of mobility has eclipsed traditional transportation planning models that focused on the automobile as the only measure of successful connection between two points. A mandate for new transportation planning methods in Florida became law in 2008 (Laws of Florida Chapter 2008-191/ House Bill 697). Florida's local governments are now required to adopt policies that discourage urban sprawl, establish energy efficient land use pattcrns, and develop transportation strategies to address reduction in !,'feenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In the QualizvlLevel of Service Handbook the Florida Department of Transportation has created level of services measures so that transit services, bicycling, and walking may be counted in addition to the traditional measure of road capacity to serve community mobility needs. This emphasis on developing in ways that reduce vehicle miles traveled results in planning for nodes that allow mobility alternatives. Rather than putting more automobile trips on the road, it is important to allow oppOliunities for walking, biking and riding the bus to access community facilities, workplaces, and shopping. Quarter-mile and half- mile pedestrian sheds, pedestrian COilllectivity, and bus transit are important concepts to guide future development and redevelopment of property along the East Trail corridor. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 13 Packet Page -59- 4/12/2011 Item B.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor gk &a6t got<loif "O~ S~ To protect and enhance the quality of life for East Naples residents and business owners, property along the East Trail shall be developed and redeveloped according to orderly and enduring development patterns that concentrate community facilities and services in locations that maximize residents' convenient access so that all needs can be met within their own community, while protecting the scenic quality and natural resources of East Naples. The following goals and strategics are the result of community input and priorities for how the East Trail should development in the future. Goal 1. Establish a framework for orderly future development and redevelopment that emulates the Rural-Urban Transect development pattern. Strategies: o Create a Vision Concept Plan as a graphic tool to show the desired development patterns along the East Trail corridor. o Establish land use and development standards that observe the range of Urban to Rural characteristics along the East Trail and promote building and site designs that provide quality environments. o The Urban Center at the nOl1heastern portion of the conidor should be a conccntration of shops, various residcntial unit typcs, offices, workplace, civic buildings, and public space in thc forn1 of plazas and parks. o General Urban areas in Segment] and Seb'ment 2 should be primarily low to mcdium density rcsidential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed usc developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and greens. o The Suburban area in Segment 3 should primarily accommodate detached single family home communities that appear landscapcd and b'l'een whcn viewed from the road ("view shed dcvelopments"). Parks and b'l'eenways arc also appropriate. o The Rural arca in Segment 4 should primarily accommodate agriculture and scattered buildings, in addition to vicwshed developments and a se1t: sustaining planned rural village. o The Natural arca is Collicr Seminole Statc Park at the southeastern tern1inus of the conidor. which is to remain in its natural unaltered state with thc exception of commercially designated land appropriate for a corner store at the intersection of C.R. 92. Goal 2. Establish centers that correspond to the Rural-Urban continuum to define locations wherc the following components of a community converge: residential, commercial, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, and community facilities. Strategies: o Establish land use and devclopment standards that encourage concentration and mix of uses at ccnters with varying intensity based on location and accessibility. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 14 Packet Page -60- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor o Town Centers are desib'Ilated at the following locations: The Collier Countv Government Complex Town Center is a location where all the components of community converge. The complex is a bus transfer station and a major work center, with connectivity to residential neighborhoods within a half mile radius. The aging shopping centers of Walmart and Naples Town Center are opportunities for redevelopment with more intense mixed use settings to incorporate new restaurants and shops within the half mile pedestrian shed. The Rattlesnake Hammock Road Town Center is a location where residential, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths and community facilities converge within the half-mile pedestrian shed. The future development of Sabal Bay could result in a new school and more commercial uses, including addition of a significant workplace. The aging shopping center at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and the East Trail is an opportunity for redevelopment with a more intense mix of uses. The Navaio Trail Town Center is a location where residential, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, schools, and a park exist, and mixed use development is proposed on existing undeveloped and underutilized sites. o Neighborhood Centers are designated at the following locations: The Sugden Park Neighborhood Center is a location where the park, residential neighborhoods, commercial uses, bus route, and some pedestrian facilities convcrge to conveniently serve the Lakewood and Avalon area residents. Due to the short lot depth of existing commercial properties along the corridor, low scale mixed use and the introduction of live-work units is proposed for the eventual redevelopment of the existing commercial properties. The Saint Andrews Boulevard Ncighborhood Center is a location where a commercial center, residential areas, pedestrian facilities, the bus route, and the library converge to scrve Lely residents and future residents of Treviso Bay. Mixcd use redevelopment and infill dcvelopment of the existing commercial center is proposed to fortify this location as a viable ccnter of neighborhood scale services within walking and biking distance for the adjacent neighborhoods. The 951 Neighborhood Center is a location where commercial centers, residential communities, and the bus route converge. This location did not achieve status as a Town Center due to its location in the Suburban Transect and the limited number of community scrvice components that are viable for this location. Eventual redevelopment of the shopping centers is envisioned as low scale, walkable, mixed use development that creates an identity for the 951 intersection that relates to the large adjacent neighborhoods of J OOOS011 Engineering, Inc. April 2010 15 Packet Page -61- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision/or the East Trail Corridor Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, and the other smaller residential neighborhoods in close proximity. o Village Centers are designated in the following locations: The 6Ls Village Center is designated where the 6Ls Farm currently exists. The Collier County Future Land Use Map designates this large property as a receiving area eligible for development as a rural village. Therefore, a Village Center is appropriate in this location. The Village Center should serve the future rural village as well as nearby residents with minimal commercial uses and services needed for convenience. o Hamlets are designated in the following locations: The Manatee School Hamlet is a location where community facilities are concentrated at the transition between the Suburban and Rural transects. This hamlet is characterized by the existing community facilities of the schools and the church. The location could be further developcd as a focal point for cOlmnunity based activities, along with commercial uses to serve nearby residents. o Rural Crossroads are designated at the following location: The C.R. 92 Rural Crossroads is designated for small scale commercial uses such as a corner store due to its location in the natural area of the Collier Seminole State Park. Goal 3. Establish mobility strategies that facilitate pedestrian, bicycle, and bus transit connections between established neighborhoods, new development and redevelopment. Stratcgies: o Limit vehicle miles travel cd by concentrating development where bus, pedestrian, and bicycle infrastructure exists or is planned. o Allow mixed use development and live-work units along with reductions in parking requirements as a mechanism to reduce vehicle miles travcled. o Require connections between new and existing development. including residential uses, commercial uses, and community facilities. o lneorporatc new bus facilities in new developments. o Promote complete strcet design for road improvement projects, so that landscape treatments promoting pedestrian comfOli, as well as pathways, bikeways and bus services, are critical components of the road design. Goal 4. Promote economic development by planning for an appropriate mix of uses and housing types to support viable new commercial, retail, restaurant, hotel, and other services. Strategies: o Analyze market characteristics and trends to identify oppOliumtJes and limitations that affect devclopment and location of desired uses along the COITidoL o Coordinate with the Economic Development Council to develop a strategy to attract new desired businesses. Johnson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 16 Packet Page -62- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Vision for the East Trail Corridor o Promote land use regulations that limit incompatible land uses and are responsive to newer trends in building and design to accommodate innovative development types. o IdentifY a "brand" for the East Trail corridor, and use it to promote the East Trail through marketing initiatives to attract new residents, new businesses and eco-tourism. Jolmson Engineering, Inc. April 2010 17 Packet Page -63- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. Sourco: Collier County ComprAh"m;ve Planning DepQrtnl",nt, Revised 6/08 L:ULF('I:: liE\iL'(' lV,l/:J~~~~~0~::. I, 4. 1.~!_t~j~!J ~,:...~ .:" L'l.}:, C:..'-\.-\ lL c,:r~- L1Nt\\"~'$~CL;<l::1 S t, "\Sm. - . , ' " ' , tE:t~ti;';~~.~:~b?#..:';~tj' L l 6 cnnOlnil' !)C\l'!urIl1CI11 (\ltlflL'11 pJ'( 'pi I i;.'I" (',\1:111:L'\' .lpk:~J-l(1rlda.c\)rn Packet Page -66- PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. E': i: "'.'[i>, Y+:'i>;~"'~':~~'{V~ EASTTRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY T',_ "" '"'~"',"_.~ ',,,,' '>~ . "... 'J, 7 ' ,~ ~ w "1, ,_.~....tl,>I"'" ir~\'ri;fm~~;M~~OA '$0;'2'009 e . ., rL .::,:.c. ..\i4'rn'n 1JL~. .i~.ili.L;;b1i:~;..J;'-:: ,;j:' I~'" ,l:-"h' ",.",:,,; \' I "!~J.:.~!?!;~~~"~A~.;I"~}~. " l:~;~,':5;;:;~- d' n:. 9:"r,. About this Study The East Naples Foundation, Inc., the philanthropic arm of the East Naples Civic Association (ENCA), is seeking community involvement to fund and complete a corridor study of Tamiami Trail East (the "East Trail") from its Airport Pulling Road intersection south to its County Road 92 intersection. The study is expected to define an identity for the East Trail corridor. The ultimate I-esult of the study is a Corridor Plan that indicates existing qualities to be protected, target areas for development and redevelopment, and an overall vision for the future. Objective of this Study The objective of this study is to anticipate, plan, and identify adjustments to regulatory framework so that the East Trail corridor grows viably while protecting quality of life. This study will ultimately result in a plan that documents the current conditions of the East Trail, identifies the vision for the future of the corridor based on community input, and outlines the goals, objectives and policies that will guide future development. Public Involvement The public involvement component of this study is important. Property owners along the corridor, nearby residents and business owners, and other stakeholders in the area, will have opportunities to participate in the study process. Through newsletters and two public meetings, the East Naples Foundation seeks to include and inform the community during the process. The first public workshop is scheduled for March 30, 2009 and the second will be determined based on availability of funds to continue the study effort. To support or get more information about the effort, please contact enaplesfnd@aol.com EiMt .NapfetJ :JOlUulaiUm, JI/I:'. 4915 :Rattl.e6,ume Jlanuno.cfi:Rd. #214 Jt' apfetJ, :Je 34113 eAST TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY FIRST PUBUCWORKSHOP MARCH 30,2.009 5~O pm t.o l~OO pm AT St Peter The Apostle Catholic: Church 5130 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Naples. ill 341 13 Packet Page -67- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. ast ral aster an tu '" SEGMENT WORKGROUP RESULTS ~.~.~.~ AESTHETICS Lands~..aplng and Oper. Space . Architectural Design . . Rural Character . Cleanlirless . CONNECTIVITY Existing Pathway I I I I . SERVICES 0 QUick Response Time I . I I I 0- Proximity to PDints ofl'lteresl r . I I . I DEVEl..OPMENT Cluanl!ty ofCommerclai Space . I New'1of'1es . , Jew Developmenl I . Density . ,- OTHER Na(ural Resources I I I . I AESTHETICS Seas of Park,ng . I clnsig'1!ty Utilities . , Unslgh\I,' 6uli('hr.gs . I GuardrailS . ! Homeless & Day Laborers I . ! Lilter I I . CONNECTIVITY LI"l,ted Conne::tl:>n be1weel1 De5tinatl~Jrls . Dangerous Roadways (TClmlanesIAccess! . . Z 0 Segmen'eo Sidewalks I . f.) DEVEL.OPMENT Jnsigh(lj' D(>ve'Cl~-nenl(~awn Tattoo) I . I . edeve,:;p''1en: Obsta::les I . I L'ml\ed CcmmerClallClt Depth I I . 51'1:) Malls . . V,,:::an: ELls'ness . I I . Lo'"" 1r:;;='~E HOJSlng I . I . High !m;.Ja,:;: ::ees . I I OTHER Per:::eived:r.me & Safety I . I . I I AESTHETICS In:::reas",:L,mdsC<lpe . Increased:!per,Spa:::e . , IncreasC'08uffer . . DeSign ReView / Review Commitlee . , Upjale Jnsigh:IY Building "a:::adl"S . , I COnlrol Llgm "'ollution I . , I CONNECTIVITY IITlfjr:;'ie/Provlje B;kelRedestrian . . I . . C()~r\e:;tions RECREATION Inc'ease: ParkS & Open Space I . . I I SERVICESJ I . I . IIIncreaSeG,';c:E'S, w Civic Uses 0 DEVELOPMENT c;) Increased Density . . I Inc:reaser1Rf>LgiIIUpSC<llej . . I Ina-easedHotels . . increasej SDtique Shops . Increased Resturan:s I . Lot pssemblylor Larger Relail I' . Busif'ess Park I . . OTHER EnVlconlT'enlal Sensitivity . Ecotour:sm . . Meeting Places/Convention . Center/Amphitheater i Cl<J! 0~k eJOW.J4/i.on., 3m:. E T'I M PI S d Johnson Engineering, Inc. H'\2003000C''20087796-000 - East Naples FoundatiCln Inc (,,,,miami Trail E, StrategIC Planning)\PUBLlC INPUT MEETING DOCUMENTS\East Naples Trail~Survey Analysis,xls Packet Page -68- t;ad g~ eJoun.Jdian, 3nc. East Trail Master Plan Study Public Input Meeting 3/30/09 Individual Questionnaire Responses What do you think the East Trail should develop f change over the next 20 years? I AESTHETICS. 14 13 AppOllflll1ce Updaleold Business Fronts Clean-up What do you like along the Trail and want to keep the same? I AESTHETICS .17 12 Landscaping I Parka I Natural Areas 2 EnlrySignaga 2 Ughl;ng 1 Old FklrldaCharaCler I CONNECTMTY.1i 3 Sidewalk I Bike Lana I MultH'SflTroil 1 ConnactivitylotheLlbrary 1 Traffic I Golf Course RECREATION. 1 I 3 libraI)' 1 Schools SERVICES." I DEVELOPMENT. 13 7 ExistinoAusnlessIls 8eol15 Eurasia Restaurant French Bakary McConnell"sHardware H~. Mov,aThaaler 6 ResidenlialDaveloP'mmt LelyRasorf TravisoBay I OTHER.2 1 Population diversity 1 LowPopulation PrmatlynyPoroonlaga DEVELOPMENT 58 46% AESTHETICS 34 27% CONNECTIVITY 16 13% OTHER 6% SERVICES 7 6% RECREATION C 3 2% Bus Station Architectural Continuity i Trans'iion Zone Betwaen Segments Landscaping Establish a Dasign Raview Commrttee AlIUtlIiliasUndarg'ound 1 LiphtinpOrd,nance I CONNECTIVITY. 7 4lmprovaT,aff<cPattems Impmve951&411n1s'Bectlons Traffclights ReCluc.eFsalingotTraflkCongeslion 2 Mo'a Sidewalk Conneclivrty i Recreation i Multi-usa lrails 1 Furll::tionailnlrastructure I RECREATION - 2 2 Environmental Enhancamanls I SERVICES-2 2 Artist Canteri Limarv I DEVELOPMENT. J1 22 Business DevaloDment Markatinga"aOashnat,on MOfaRaslaurants EnaouragsUp"c:alaDavalopmanl Reslaurants Oocal and chains) Indoor i Ouldoot Dining 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. What is your biggest concern about the East Trail? I AESTHETICS. J 3 Parcepbonand Appeatance LossofCha,acter Lack otMaintenanca afl<l Rainveslment I CONNECTlVITY-4 2T,affocSafaty 2 Soletyfor BicyclislondPe<teslrions 1.{<":;:/)\.;:)0'/.",</ .RECREATION -.0 I SERVICES. 1 1 LostSeovices I DEVELOPMENT. 14 6 Blight and Vacant StoraFronls 3 Low Income Housiog 2 BalancadGrowlhiUncontrolledGrowlh 1 AbundBnce 01 Sloraga units 1 Oeoelopmant of Strip Malls 1 MobilaHomas I OTHER-2 2 Crime DDEVELOPMENT 46% DCONNECTIVITY 13% 27% Packet Page -69- o DEVELOPMENT I IlAESTHETICS i DCONNECTIVITY I DOTHER ~ SERVICES o RECREATION Johnson Engineering, Inc. H:\200eOO00\20GB7796--000 East Napla"- Foundahon Inc, (Tamiami Trail E, Strategic PlallningjlPU6L1C INPUT MEETING OOCUMENTS\East Naples Trail_Su'vey Analysis.xls Retail Hotel Prohibit Pawn and Adult Entertainment Stores Mixed-usa Developmant Commercial Node" (rathe'lhan strip molls & s\orage units) 3 Raductionot Slnp Malls 3 LimilLowlnoomaHou",,,g 1 Park'oginthaRllar01 Davelopmenls 1 Acoommodala Rural Viliage Development 1 Limn Rasidantial Un~s aecomin~ Ralail I OTHER.4 2 LongerOparat,ng Hours lor Business 1 CnmaControliPrevenlion 1 COllhnLJEtthaCurrenlPlan CORRIDOR PRIORITIES Responses from Individual Questionnaires SERVICES 0 RECREAl'lON 6% 2% o OTHER 60. 4/12/2011 Item G.C. EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet ADDRESS EMAIL 2d <:;t{~~S ,C;; J~ \)'(5k~e~La'M l' [u_<,., c,........" \,IR"":^f fYl',e'-."",\bJs, e.coll;'/jD',,,,<,,,,- 1'/h3 ~~=f~' 2 _~; (, 15", , 3 j, tJ-n-rv.-J ) d 4 Of--{ 121:<) T; (llR..L'D f cl.tonfVh~. f!'~. ~ f) (}' , C;PSARLO@ ~H'Ir\D rf/'\.j lie",-/'-' p a f lurlf.'!.o "t q ~ D .f3or Jlle... $i:A.d I2d lJe OJI-'f:J ,(,S ,--;'J 13</ 5 2or~c:.-N 4bf-IIfN71 101-0 /lvfi~t4-t Gr4"-' .L1114- 6..;)E1J(V(l~E ---r.4Nlli02. c2. ~r7 B,t-I( /)1E7TOiJLI./S r:J1i.. LELL/GIVIC.'//-SSN gj) A<9t... (CFU-z 7 .fj1~"/}t&'lf ~:l5~:V ;JAt I I 8 ~~ :P7_~ ' ~/ M Ct':{ I( (931 e:;lm::.('(~ 1/;' .~ I '3 &> ~ C( !-ki-lA{i-M/r.~ 9 17!\1'i---:J..f1!?JI- L/;<Sr0/ (VL.A./d C' ''i-'-:("-~;' ( 1.)[::: b _ f 5 5 r:::-n./L1'.f,c,I@:,!i~~ o 3G \l\ j-t qU,,-,~,,,-, . COv..'" 10 ~y-J/\ Ij"..JJ :t S).z..lrVv-<.. L--~ ~e.Y'(:L t-:sx..v ,"---OJ\.. ~ J~-C(}r. so. S, \""l"'-v ~ cl ~(No... 3~ , Co> \1..... 5~ [\00 l,,~t~ ll'J -{G2D'1 '€.Shld)l~eU;ie"'e"'~-W'\ 41fS- hdc&n Q..Jc PKw( .. . L i/VofbSiFC 3l(l/b );a/07./-hr(71mgn:1iI.ho'(;~ 3-1""-/ J3e6C#<:d<:O<fJfl Lr'1-f0 1/7/'*"'-. 34/12.-- ~': t"''' l'. P~Q~'N.:r 11 6,-[. ')),..v"1' t.\L.l.vw 12 KCrt:n HOr/'YIO(7 1~ ;5PEPtZ.6J? I Packet Page -70- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting NAME ADDRESS ftJc:Jt-.f'4M ,E'AI.t1t?,4/.I tJ;~ A0z ,.fl.€' J :3 /~'!fIvI'I...~ .> "7' //y J '3 ,,1 cP 11' /hU 11f!.u p:::. A vr- EMAIL 15 14 L;;o C /! 1<- r,ef?LAtdEAJ4$ e-' 4j/Q/,.{o/Pj f,c /1/ZT;E:.JZ.. 3..!1 a 4oL-, ,~ 14 ;l/;CMt':t ,/J /~&4?f/ 16CI-III!<..LIU C(!)r<.II<(~f(r L.-J 51<1/ /1- 2-{,. G-L,40cs J)/.. I/o 1'2. C-fT FI n.LftJ fIo L. . (.0A1 17 S\J.-Wc.v-'V~~ r:;Jd'tO ~IJ~~.<n W1',.QI.,, 3lilf2. 16a;rJt~ :; J~~ ~~- r::i U "- INl',< 1ZEe€ <tblt~ 19 ';t /t- f3DJ htf"" 1.:5&~ J p..- f2 C ~.~ -. 6'h1 ,,~s. nv1 20qjtIJ gvt-t/t'o-07- $l6J8 *,;r1>~JYl.i-irle, #/J; 3<1//.;1. ck~;;~~:~1?-(I"V"l 1 :SU'SaV\ Go 'de\,\ ~<\ l.zl.\ c..\'I~V ~ ~\:iQI-1~~S,@ to.'lAefu:,1;. \'\J 229JU//1/- r;(~ !JG.-j 4t~ fY..-&( fr I () LISNG€OR.CE S(,6,f;>EI1((TIIWNt.lX.;:r r-' <'y>l .e... S '-t It Ii 23 L",.,.....,...,( M v t-+-er 11~(g ~,'o~ fa.- LP-.~e... 24 ,It,! is G"-.(7 J2f7~ Wvy 2. ~@~1,,..J- 25 26 27 28 29 Page 2 Packet Page -71- 4/12/2011 Item 6.C. EASTTAMJAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet ADDRESS EMAIL G \l.\~S ~f\\-\r\ov ~*~d-. ~'('Y@~ 1 ~a:I"\V~ 'l~'N '0~(a5~~'DG( \~\..~.c D'iV\. A 46 (7::, Q,UG I(~L( C'/. C\'!J{).,Pc..q @ AcJC ~ 2 (A/J IJJ, TlSVW-fY! U4(?L'lf R 5lf/n I, o~ 3 DO 3; TA-i"'-i ~ 'l'fL 3 \ A..{} i?-e..LE- n U cl" r. 3 '..h O~ 4 S t~ ~;;c Ie L( 11 ;CI L.'len? I3J ()rJ t..J 5 t:Ju1.t~A_ t: o~~ 1\"," 4" UJ"F",~I' I\'i~" k NAME 8 1~1 {t{,{ r -{'-en '/30" n f' S " 9 1L;;(3 ~I.s L l (L 105 &fr l(;vcA>t'1..1rb 11 12 13 6375 h/-j ISC. d fJd 7-3'lO'f;?crvJ<v'1 L'l 5'/17.0 J Y \\L& Co,-ue-(.. et-l'l?U' ~li"c-- S.. v-.. a//4../(./UJifkrCiJlT/P,kv!' .. I~ N (i 'rr/6 I /(hf1f'!1 ~ Enhltf(! h,'l. to"ly C~;(J<; ) >' 307(! 0---~.Vr..."""";/. p "'" bonne.s.s(;;; hntc", Ilhp. ne't t.li.J?--j IJ\j'<.:L"Jf<;J (!(..upj)~ 173L(.J({rtI!}'.N/leL~> L/~I'h~l.(", dt/ tjL: " lrc?J t,,9'1/ /lJ!; J -f;e! MV -]t;(I1'J,4(;Jjo,;iw-! U/} Packet Page -72- Gaspar Self Storage Hiwasse Storage Angileri Self Storage Midgard Storage W illiam HuffStorageCategory5Storage Alliance Moving Storage Naples Moving Storage Rattlesnake Hammock Self Storage HiltonMovingandStorage City Gate Commence ParkSelfStorageFacility Vincentian MPUD Self Storage Extra Space Storage East Naples Self Storage( Car l's - W hiteGlovePersonalStorage) Sunbelt Rentals Sara Bay Marina Big Cypress Flea Mar ket Phase 3 Mini Storage StorAll Building Ultimate Garages, LLC U-Store-It NBC Stora ge Public Storage Jim's Stow Away iStora ge Naples Hideaway Storage Bayshore Storage Warehouse Ser vies Maxi Self Storage Hide-Away Stora ge Naples EZ Storage Ace Super Storage Naples EZ Storage Adkos Self Storage Punta Cana Storage B & J Cool Storage Extra Space Storage Extra Space Storage Naples Mini-Storage Simply Self Storage Capital & StoreSmar t Storage Cypress Self Storage Downtown Mini Storage Recreational Warehouse Goodlette Self Stora ge Tollgate Business Park Storage Cubesmar t Self Storage CubeSmar t Self Storage Cubesmar t self storage Cain-Jones Self Storage Storesmar t Self Storage Pine Ridge Mini Storage Cain-Jones Self Storage The LockUpSelfStorageBldg1 & Bldg 2 Moder n Mover s Self Stor age Taray Inter national Warehouse Midgard Naples Boat & Self Storage Olde Naples Self Stor age (Nor th) Olde Naples Self Storage (South) U-Haul Moving & Storage of Naples The Lock Up Storage Center s - Piper Blvd The Lock Up Stora ge Centers - Pine Ridge The Lock Up Stora ge Centers - Golden Gate IMMOKALEE RD INTERSTATE 75LIVINGSTON RDTAMIAMITRLNCOLLIER BLVDDAVIS BLVD TAMIAMI TRL EGOODLETTE RD NPI NE RI DGE RD RADIORD GOLDEN GATE PKY LOGAN BLVDNVANDERBILT BEACH RDVANDERBILT DRAIRPORT PULLING RD NGOLDEN GATE BLVD W SANTA BARBARA BLVDGREEN BLVDOLD US41RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD BONITA BEACH RD 111TH AVE N VANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT W I G G I N S PA S S R D C O L L I E R C O U N T Y S E L FSTORAGEFACILITYCOLLIERCOUNTYSELFS T O R A G E F A CI LI T Y Cool Storage Marco Storage Adkos Self Storage Prime Stor age - Mar co Island SAN MARCO RD COLLIER BLVDB A L D E A G L E D R N BARFIELD DR N COLLIERBLVDSBARFIELDDRS COL L I ER BL VDG O O D L A N D D R01 2 30.5 Miles LEE COUNTY 754195195195141417575 GIS Mapping: Beth Yang, AICPData Source: https:// www.selfstorage. com/ self- storage/florida/naplesCollier County Zoning/Planning SectionDate: 6/ 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 239) 434-0333 Fax (239) 434-9320 SINCE 1946 Memo To: Mike Bosi, Collier County Planning and Zoning Director From: Laura DeJohn, Principal Planner II Date: 4/3/2018 Re: U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations PProject Description The limits of this U.S. 41 Corridor Study extend approximately 6.8 miles along U.S. 41 between Palm Street/Commercial Drive and Price Street. The Study Area is defined as the commercially zoned parcels that are adjacent to U.S. 41 (see Figure 1 on the following page). Within this corridor, approximately 1.25 miles are within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area from Palm Street/Commercial Drive to Haldeman Creek.1 The Study Area is generally suburban in nature with segments that vary in character from the northern redevelopment area to the southern area emerging with new residential communities and shopping centers. There are few destinations along the corridor for community attraction or entertainment other than Sugden Regional Park and Eagle Lakes Community Park. The purpose of this Study is to determine the public’s preferences for future development types and uses so that those types of development and uses can be facilitated and incentivized through Comprehensive Plan policies and Land Development Code. 1 The U.S. 41 Corridor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) boundary, however the recommendations of this Study are only for lands outside of the CRA boundary. Any reference to property within the CRA boundary is not intended to alter or vary from the CRA’s Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future development within the CRA. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 2 FFIGURE 1: Map by Collier County GIS U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 3 PPublic Involvement Summary The main objective of the Study was to conduct public input meetings to help the community discern the best potential outcomes to serve community needs along the corridor. Initial Stakeholder Outreach was performed in June, July, and August 2017. Stakeholder Outreach included attendance and presentation of the purpose of the Corridor Study at the East Naples Civic Association meeting of July 5, 2017, the East Naples Merchant’s Association meeting of August 10, 2017, and the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board Meetings of June 6, 2017 and August 1, 2017. See Attachment 1 for the handout that was provided during Stakeholder Outreach. In addition to Stakeholder Outreach, three public input meetings were held as described below. These meetings were noticed through media postings by the East Naples Civic Association, East Naples Merchant’s Association, and Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency. The three public input meetings were conducted in the same manner, with a 30- to 40-minute presentation describing existing conditions and commercial siting influences, and a 19-item image preference survey. The image preference survey was organized to obtain input on the preferred outcomes in the following realms: 1) Desired aesthetic or community character: Participants were asked to indicate preferences for different corridor features and development forms, including landscaping, green space or vistas, building massing, building scale and building position along the street. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 4 2) Desired development types and uses: Participants were asked to indicate preferences for different development types and uses, including hotels, shopping centers, mixed use, live-work, entertainment, multifamily, and live-work. 3) Regulatory options: Participants were asked to indicate preference for different regulatory options to influence future development along the corridor through incentives or standards. 4) Administrative options: Participants were asked to indicate preference for establishing a redevelopment agency, taxing unit or community branding effort. Participants also had the opportunity for a Question and Answer period, and forms were available for attendees to submit written comments. During the three public input meetings, a total of approximately 144 participants attended and performed the image preference survey. A total of 107 written comments were also received. Meeting summaries, survey results, written comments and sign-in sheets for each of the three meetings are provided in Attachment 2. FFindings SUMMARY OF SURVEY AND WRITTEN COMMENT OUTCOMES The outcome of the image preference survey revealed the majority of participants support the following: x 51% support a strip mall with mmore variety of retailers (Banana Republic and Talbots were pictured in the image). x 90% support hhotels, and 59% support a rresort style hotel set back from the road with heavy landscaping. x 84% support ttwo-story multifamily, with 58% preferring the style of Avalon of Naples at the corner of Davis Boulevard and County Barn Road when “all of the above” responses are included. x 64% support ffour- to five-story multifamily buildings, with 53% preferring a design with Mediterranean architecture when “all of the above” responses are included. x 51% support a mmanicured landscape appearance along the roadway x 65% support an ooffice complex with a single story orientation and a treed landscape along the roadway x 71% support businesses with ttwo-story buildings set back from the roadway, with a treed landscape buffer and single bay of parking x 92% support median and roadside llandscaping with shade trees and palms x 81% support ffour- to five-story mixed use buildings when “all of the above” responses are included. x 89% support mmore local restaurants when “all of the above” responses are included, and 89% support mmore sit down restaurants when “all of the above” responses are included x 79% support ddestination shopping (five-story Mercato was pictured in the image). U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 5 x 72% support ttwo- to three-story “live-work” buildings with workplaces on ground floors and residences above when “all of the above” responses are included, with 59% supporting a ttraditional two-story main street style appearance when “all of the above” responses are included. x 94% agree with iincentives to encourage preferred development types, with 42% preferring impact fee credits for tear down and re-build situations when “all of the above” responses are included. x 96% agree with rregulatory updates for development along the corridor, with 48% preferring updated standards for landscaping, when “all of the above” responses are included. x 90% agree with administrative changes, with 62% preferring a ccommunity based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program, when “all of the above” responses are included. The outcome of the image preference survey revealed the majority of participants do not support the following: x 67% ddo not support self storage facilities, however 31% favored one that is multi-story with Mediterranean architecture and landscaping (Coconut Point self-storage facility was pictured in the image). x 64% ddo not support gas stations, however 30% favored one that is buffered with landscaping Racetrac at the corner of Airport Road and North Horseshoe Drive was pictured in the image). The written comments received during the Public Input Meetings were categorized into subject areas, listed below in order of the most commented to the least commented subjects: SSubject of Written Comments Percent of Respondents Preferred Development 41.3 Rebranding 10.3 Traffic 10.0 Bikes & Pedestrians 8.7 NOT Preferred Development 8.0 Incentives 7.7 Design 4.7 Landscaping 3.7 Infrastructure 2.7 Open Space 2.3 Redevelopment 0.7 A final public meeting was held on February 21, 2018 to review the findings and proposed recommended actions. Attendees also had the opportunity for a Question and Answer period, and forms were available for attendees to submit written comments. Approximately 44 attendees were present, and nineteen written comments were collected. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 6 The comments provided at the final meeting covered a wide range of topics and opinions. The most commented topics were relatively consistent with the comments received at the three earlier Public Input Meetings, except that references to undesired uses made up a larger proportion of comments received. The final meeting comments were primarily regarding: undesired uses, preferred development, bicycle and pedestrian safety, and rebranding. The presentation, written comments and sign-in sheets for this meeting are provided in Attachment 3. The findings from all the public surveys and comments were organized into priorities representing public’s most commented issues. “Main points” corresponding to each priority topic are provided below to summarize the general consensus on these topics derived from comments and feedback during the public meetings. Some participants were vocal about the development types they that do NOT prefer, such as affordable housing and storage facilities, however the focus of this study was to identify mechanisms for encouraging development types that are preferred. Therefore, the priority topics include reference to new and different businesses desired, rather than reference to precluding certain uses. Priority Topics Main Points Community identity East Naples residents support branding the area to make the assets of the area known and attract more of what the community wants. New and different businesses are desired: Hotel/Resort, Grocery options, Wholesale Club, Restaurants Any change must be part of a framework that controls for appearance, intensity and traffic. Transportation The corridor has too much traffic and not enough safe bicycle and pedestrian features and open space. Redevelopment Improvement to unsightly, older buildings and vacant commercial buildings is needed. Landscaping Enhance the appearance along the roadside. RRecommendations Recommended actions were developed to address the priority topics that were voiced by the public. The recommended actions were derived based on the understanding of the East Trail Corridor conditions and the following commercial siting constraints: U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 7 x Limited number of four-way intersections compromising the ability of businesses to maximize visibility and accessibility in the marketplace. x Small lot sizes limiting ability to design and enhance the appearance of businesses and properties. x Challenges of the width and speed of a six-lane state highway for businesses to sustain in an attractive and successful way, and for the public to comfortably travel by car, bicycle or foot. The recommended actions are consistent with planning concepts for revitalization of commercial strip corridors endorsed by the American Planning Association, Congress for New Urbanism, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Smart Growth Program. The Collier County Community Character Plan 2001) and the Blue Zones Project East Naples Discovery Report (2018) were also used as resources in the preparation of these recommendations. The community members’ objective to see the East Trail corridor and their community transform into a desirable place that is more attractive, vibrant, and less dominated with traffic, requires comprehensive changes to the physical conditions of the corridor’s transportation infrastructure and built environment. This can be achieved through multiple steps over many years, including: a community based branding effort to identify and promote the desired conditions within and outside the community, amendment to the Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Code consistent with the vision for a variety of destinations with more greenery and less congestion, and infrastructure enhancements to improve the safety for all users and enhance appearance along the U.S. 41 right-of-way. Six recommendations are enumerated below to move forward with the desires that the community expressed. The recommendations can be considered in two increments: Quick fix” recommendations can be accomplished within one to two years, including revisions and adjustments to the Land Development Code, and Long term recommendations will require additional impact analysis and potential amendment to the Growth Management Plan and other major plans, which could take two to four years, or longer relative to transportation planning. QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION # 1) CCommunity based branding project Civic and Business organizations should work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. This recommenda tion reflects the second most commented item, which is the community’s desire to esta blish its identity, to celebra te its a ttributes, a nd to encourage a nd a ttra ct more of the development types a nd uses tha t a re considered la cking in the a rea . The idea of a community-based branding effort to esta blish an identity and marketing progra m wa s the a dministra tive cha nge supported by the most survey participa nts. This is a Quick Fix recommenda tion because it ca n be initia ted by the community lea ders immedia tely. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 8 TThe branding project would be sponsored and coordinated by civic groups as a mechanism for community members to come together a nd genera te a “bra nd” that sets the community apart, helps define the first impressions to others of what the community stands for, and helps foster a sense of pride and enthusiasm for the future. QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION #2) DDesired businesses The County Growth Management Department should provide information to the development community about outcomes of the Study and uses that are preferred. This recommendation reflects the first and second most commented items, which are to encourage preferred types of new a nd different businesses to locate in the a rea a nd to establish a nd communica te a new “brand” to others. This is a Quick Fix recommenda tion because it ca n be implemented by County sta ff immedia tely upon Boa rd direction. Ma ny pa rticipants in the public meetings identified certa in reta ilers a nd resta ura nts tha t a re desired to locate in the a rea . With growth a nd permitting trends indicating a steady increase in the number of households in East Na ples, there will be a la rger customer ba se tha t commercia l interests na tura lly follow. The County sta ff is often one of the first points of conta ct for those who seek to develop in the County, therefore the opportunity for County staff to provide the outcomes of the U.S. 41 Corridor Study and the future bra nding project will help convey the community’s interests ea rly in the process a nd potentially influence some decision ma king a bout design a nd types of uses a nd orienta tion of those uses by potentia l developers. QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION # 3) RRedevelopment and development standards a) New development will meet Collier County’s architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. b) For gas station or self storage development, consider separation requirements, location standards or minimum percentages of retail or office mix as part of these developments to mitigate for proliferation along this corridor. This recommendation reflects the reality of the conditions of the corridor; a focus on redevelopment and development sta ndards is necessary to achieve the community members’ objective to transform the corridor to be more a ttra ctive, vibra nt, a nd less domina ted with traffic. Because the County is actively addressing many of these issues by prepa ring new redevelopment sta ndards, this is considered a Quick Fix recommenda tion tha t ca n be a ccomplished through La nd Development Code a mendments. Redevelopment activities a re increasingly at the forefront of the County’s planning and development process a s older buildings rea ch the end of their functiona l lives in the esta blished urba n a rea s, while demands for more housing a nd services continue in these area s. The County has a n Impa ct Fee Cha nge of Use Progra m for Existing Commercia l Development which helps to incentivize the re-use of esta blished buildings. Demolition and reconstruction projects a re not eligible for this progra m. Some redevelopment regula tions ha ve been a dopted, U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 9 iincluding the Site Plan with Devia tions process to a llow relief for those redeveloping properties that are too small or otherwise constrained and unable to meet some of today’s more stringent requirements. The recommenda tion to further refine redevelopment standards and apply these along the corridor is pa rt of a n ongoing County effort to recognize the development potentia l that ca n be derived from older strip centers tha t a re underperforming. Redevelopment of shopping centers, large pa rking lots and la rge empty storefronts can be encoura ged by allowing mix of residentia l a nd commercia l uses in a wa y tha t a llows for rela xed pa rking sta nda rds, resulting in more a rea s for landsca ping a nd open spa ces. As pa rt of the effort to refine redevelopment sta nda rds, the County should revisit separa tion requirements for ga s sta tions a nd self stora ge fa cilities, as these uses a re contra ry to revita liz a tion strategies a imed to promote more huma n sca le a nd vibrant environments. These a lterna tive stra tegies should be considered for controlling prolifera tion of ga s sta tions a nd self storage facilities: Sepa ration requirements may be increased from the currently adopted 500-foot separation requirement for gas stations to a quarter-mile (1,320 feet), which is the dista nce a pedestrian will typically walk comforta bly within five minutes. This would relieve the sense of prolifera tion by providing a separation that is consistent with the basic building block of a pedestrian scale environment. Such a requirement may be a pplied to self-stora ge fa cilities as well. The LDC would continue to a llow applicants to request waivers through the Boa rd of Zoning Appea ls process. In a ddition to sepa ra tion requirements, the loca tion of new ga s sta tions or self stora ge facilities ca n be limited or restricted in Activity Centers to maintain the intention for those nodes to be pedestria n friendly, huma n sca le live/work/pla y settings. Applica nts could be given the opportunity to seek Boa rd of Zoning Appea ls a pprova l of such a fa cility in a n Activity Center by demonstra ting the fa cility meets stringent design criteria , or by incorpora ting a minimum percenta ge, such a s 25% of the fa cility, to be used for community oriented genera l reta il, persona l service, or genera l or professional office use. QUICK FIX & LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION #4) LLandscaping Implement a roadside landscaping enhancement strategy. a) Substitute standards for landscaping in front yards for better “curb appeal” specific to conditions of U.S. 41 East. b) Review options for enhanced roadside landscaping in the right-of-way. These recommendations reflect the eighth most commented item, which wa s landsca ping. The recommendation to implement overla y zoning sta ndards to address landsca ping was the regulatory idea supported by the most survey pa rticipants. This is both a Quick Fix recommenda tion because standards can be updated through Land Development Code amendments, and a Long Term recommenda tion because enha nced roadside landscaping in the right-of-way requires at least three years to plan, fund, design, permit, and construction. The commercia l development that exists a long U.S. 41 between the activity center nodes is limited in potentia l for significant changes or redevelopment due to traffic conditions and the constra ined size of the lots. Aesthetic U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 10 iimprovements, such as roadside landsca ping will help improve the attractiveness for these businesses to residents a nd the travelling public. The landscaping standards that apply to the front yards along the East Trail are the same as for all of Collier County, however the conditions along the East Trail are very unique due to the size and orientation of lots. An Overlay for corridor-specific landscaping standards can be applied to this Study Area through Land Development Code amendments. The front yard buffer standa rds need not be necessarily more strict or encumbering of the properties, but they can be more responsive to the existing conditions with appropria te species, sizes and a rrangements of landscaping and more consistent with the manicured appearance that was favored by most survey participants. The options for enha nced roadway landsca ping in the right-of-way requires landscape architectura l planning and coordina tion between FDOT and County Transportation and Landscape Architecture staff to determine an a ppropriate variety of roadside landscaping tha t works within the constra ints of the U.S. 41 right-of-way. This has been accomplished in other communities (see image below of U.S. 41 right-of-way landsca ping enhancements in Bonita Springs). Enhancements of this nature require coordina tion on design, permitting, funding and maintenance to achieve local goals. Landscaping enhancements along U.S. 41 in the City of Bonita Springs LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION #5) Identify ttarget locations or “nodes” for allowing preferred new types of development and redevelopment. a) Confirm or expand the 3 existing Activity Centers: Airport Road; Thomasson/Rattlesnake; Collier Boulevard. b) Consider addition of 2 new minor Activity Center opportunities at: St Andrews Square and Vincentian PUD/Eagle Lakes Park. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 11 c) Apply Redevelopment/Infill incentives and standards for Mixed Use Destinations and Hotels in these locations. TThese recommendations reflect the first most commented item, which is to encourage preferred types of new and different businesses to loca te in the a rea . These recommendations are long term because they require amendment to the Growth Management Plan, which requires additiona l supporting analysis and takes one to two years. The beginning of a more organized development pattern for the corridor is the identifica tion of nodes for centers of a ctivity to concentrate, with incentiviza tion for the desired Mixed Use Destinations with shopping and restaurants a nd hotels. These nodes need to be located where the market drives development to occur, at intersections. The three existing intersections that are designated as Activity Centers are #16-Government Complex, #17- Thomasson/Rattlesnake Hammock, and #18-Collier Bouleva rd. These are already built or under development, and should be evaluated for expansion. One opportunity is the expansion of the Government Complex Activity Center to include Naples Towne Center.Expansion areas a nd new activity centers at St.Andrews Square and the Vincentian PUD should be evalua ted to determine the potential to help fill in ga ps a long the corridor and allow more opportunities for desired uses. In addition to the amendments to the Future Land Use Map series necessary to redefine Activity Centers, text a mendments to the Growth Management Pla n would be need to be evaluated if the potential for higher densities or intensities or other changes that would help encoura ge redevelopment of the older underperforming shopping centers and encourage development of a mix of uses for live/work/play environments that are able to endure the trending decline of brick-and-morta r retail a nd provide for adequate return on investment. If necessary, corresponding zoning policies and standards would be implemented through further refinement of redevelopment a nd development standards in the Land Development Code. U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 12 LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION # 6) TTransportation Needs a) Identify opportunities to use connecting street for bicycles and pedestrians. b) Coordinate with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan to identify locations for new sidewalks, bikeways, transit and greenways and connections to serve the corridor. c) Establish design criteria to promote secondary corridors to connect to commercial and mixed use centers. d) Coordinate with County Transportation staff & Florida DOT on options for retrofitting enhancements, start with intersections. This set of recommendations reflects the third and fourth most commented items, which were traffic and bicycle a nd pedestria n opportunities. While this Study was not intended to contemplate changes to the roadway infra structure (tra vel la nes, pedestrian facilities, or roadway landsca ping) these elements contribute to the experience along the corridor, and must be considered as part of any long term planning for revitalization along the corridor. Accomplishing physica l change to the U.S. 41 roadway itself is a major challenge. It is a state highwa y built for a significant amount of traffic, so any reduction in traffic capacity would require alterna tive routes, and this is geographically not feasible. Thus, recommendations are meant to improve the network of roads that connect to a nd run parallel to U.S. 41, and to incrementa lly seek to retrofit enhancements to improve the experience for pedestrians, bicyclists a nd motorists in coopera tion with FDOT. Connecting streets are the “feeder” streets that connect most residential communities to the U.S. 41 corridor. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities should be added or enha nced along these streets to make connections from residentia l a reas to locations where destina tions or “nodes” are pla nned a long the corridor. These “nodes” and intersections a long U.S. 41 should be a priority issue when County Transporta tion sta ff coordina tes with Florida Depa rtment of Transportation on retrofitting enhancements and improving safety, especially for pedestria ns a nd bicyclists. The streets pa rallel to U.S. 41 should be considered opportunities for developing a safer path for bicyclists a nd pedestria ns to move up and down the corridor. For much of the 6.8-mile U.S. 41 Study Area , the road network features para llel streets including Tamiami Lane, Outer Drive, Florida n Avenue, Tamiami Court, and 1st Street. These parallel streets are an opportunity for safe and convenient movement of bicyclists a nd pedestrians. Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network improvements for the East Naples area should be identified by County Transporta tion staff and coordinated with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestria n Master Plan so that locations for new sidewalks, bikeways, transit and greenwa ys and connections ca n be planned, funded and developed. Missing links along the parallel corridors can be filled through design standards that promote linkage to these secondary corridors a s pa rt of new development or redevelopment of commercial and mixed use centers. The U.S. 41 Corridor Study – Summary of Findings and Recommendations April 3, 2018 Page 13 ddesign standards can be implemented as part of the refinement of redevelopment and development standards in the Land Development Code. In summary, the recommendations are re-stated below: QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION #1) CCommunity based branding project Civic and Business organizations should work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION #2) DDesired businesses. The County Growth Management Department should provide information to the development community about outcomes of the Study and uses that are preferred. QUICK FIX RECOMMENDATION #3) RRedevelopment and development standards a) New development will meet Collier County’s architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. b) For gas station or self storage development consider separation requirements, location standards or minimum percentages retail or office mix as part of these developments to mitigate for proliferation along this corridor. QUICK FIX & LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION #4) LLandscaping Implement a roadside landscaping enhancement strategy. a) Substitute standards for landscaping in front yards for better “curb appeal” specific to conditions of U.S. 41 East. b) Review options for enhanced roadside landscaping in the right-of-way. LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION #5) Identify ttarget locations or “nodes” for allowing preferred new types of development and redevelopment. a) Confirm or expand the 3 existing Activity Centers: Airport Road; Thomasson/Rattlesnake; Collier Boulevard. b) Consider addition of 2 new minor Activity Center opportunities at: St Andrews Square and Vincentian PUD/Eagle Lakes Park. c) Apply Redevelopment/Infill incentives and standards for Mixed Use Destinations and Hotels in these locations. LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION #3) TTransportation Needs a) Identify opportunities to use connecting street for bicycles and pedestrians. b) Coordinate with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan to identify locations for new sidewalks, bikeways, transit and greenways and connections to serve the corridor. c) Design criteria to promote secondary corridors to connect to commercial and mixed use centers. d)Coordinate with Transportation staff & Florida DOT on options for retrofitting enhancements, start with intersections. AATTACHMENT 1 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH HANDOUT Study Area Palm Street/Commercial Drive Price Streett t Purpose The purpose of this Study is to determine the public’s preferences for future development types and uses so that those types of development and uses can be facilitated and incentivized through Comprehensive Plan policies and Land Development Code. Public 1 – October 3rd, 2017 (6:00-8:00 pm) East Naples Community Park—3500 Thomasson Drive, Naples, FL 34112 Goal: Public preferences for uses/development type along corridor Public 2 - November 7th, 2017 (6:00-8:00 pm) Eagle Lakes Community Park—11565 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 Goal: Public preferences for uses/development type along corridor Final December 2017/January 2018 Goal: Present the and for to preferred development or businesses along the corridor Schedule Johnson Engineering, Inc. Extent of Corridor: Commercial properties along U.S. 41 from Palm Street/Commercial Drive to Price Street Length of Corridor: 6.8 Miles Number of lanes: 6 Posted speed: 45 & 50 mph Transit available: CAT Intermodal Transfer Station connects Routes 17, 18, 24, 11, 13 and 14. Current traffic counts: 32,500—42,000 Average Annual Daily Traffic Community Characteristics 91,281 Annual Growth through 2022 2.9% Median Age 52.3 Total Households 41,138 Average Household Size 2.2 persons Median Household Income $60,143 Housing Units 56,004 Housing Units Vacant 14,866 36.1%) Housing Units Occupied 41,378 73.5%) Housing Units Owner Occupied 28,638 69.6%) Housing Units Renter Occupied 12,500 30.4%) Businesses 5,836 Employees 64,938 Company Headquarter Businesses 8 Company Headquarter Employees 2,815 per business 15.6 Labor Force age 16 and over 79,108 Unemployment rate 2.6% DEVELOPMENT 46% AESTHETICS 27% CONNECTIVITY 13% OTHER 6% SERVICES 6% RECREATION 2% CORRIDOR PRIORITIES Responses from Individual Questionnaires Priorities identified by the public during the 2009-2010 East Trail Corridor Study were : 1. Development Types— preferences for types of businesses and com- munities 2.Aesthetic Types—appearance of roadsides and buildings 3.Traffic—safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians Examples of Design Source: Naples Daily News Examples of Higher Density/ Mixed Use Development Source: Gulfshore Life Source: Future Cape Town Examples of Live/ Work Along the Corridor Source: 525 Town Lake Source: Naples Daily News Prepared By : For Collier County 3 mile Trade Area Business and Employment 2017) 3 mile Trade Area Housing Inventory 2017) 3 mile Trade Area and Housing Summary (2017) AATTACHMENT 2 PUBLIC INPUT MEETING SUMMARIES, SURVEY RESULTS, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND SIGN-IN SHEETS 10/3/ 17 Public Input Meeting Summary Page 1 U.S. 41 Corridor Study Public Input Meeting #1 Summary October 3rd, 2017 – East Naples Community Park (6:00pm-8:00pm) The first of three public input meetings for the U.S. 41 Corridor Study was held on October 3, 2017 at East Naples Community Park. The meeting began at approximately 6:00 p.m. The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area Advisory Board met prior to this meeting from approximately 5:00 to 6:00 p.m., allowing for its members and audience to attend the U.S. 41 Corridor Study meeting thereafter. Because of the transitioning from one meeting to another, there was no ability to perform a sign-in system for audience members attending this meeting. Based on the number of responses received during the survey portion of the meeting, approximately 70 audience members participated. Laura DeJohn, Principal Planner with Johnson Engineering and Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director of Collier County Growth Management, began the evening with a presentation summarizing the U.S. 41 Corridor Study background and purpose. Laura gave a description of physical characteristics of the corridor, including existing transportation infrastructure, traffic counts, and lot dimensions. Laura summarized the proportions of existing uses and future land use and zoning. Mike discussed demographics and real estate market conditions, followed by an explanation of commercial development patterns. He identified the potential for growth in the vicinity of the corridor including thousands of new dwelling units and substantial new commercial development based on approvals in place for the next five to ten years. Mike identified the trends in Internet shopping and integration of uses to maximize live/work/play opportunities, with an example being the proposed Mini-Triangle development at the intersection of U.S. 41 and Davis Boulevard. Laura concluded the presentation by explaining options for incentives, regulation changes and administrative changes that could impact the look and the type of development along the corridor in the future. She highlighted the meeting schedule for the next public meetings and next steps for the study. Several questions were raised by the audience. There were concerns raised about how increased development will be detrimental to traffic and congestion. The next portion of the meeting was the Image Preference Survey. Audience members were given the option to respond to the survey on paper or electronically using cellular devices. Based on the survey responses, approximately 70 audience members participated. Audience members were advised that the results will be tallied with the results of the subsequent public input meetings and final public meeting to present findings was to be scheduled for December 2017/January 2018. (*Note this meeting schedule was subsequently altered, and the presentation of findings was re-scheduled for February 21, 2018.) Attachments: Image Preference Survey Results Written Comments No sign-in sheets were collected at this meeting.) Question A Corresponding Pictures B Corresponding Pictures C Corresponding Pictures D Corresponding Pictures E Corresponding Pictures Total Received 1 0 283310Noneoftheabove 0 71 2 124373Noneoftheabove 0 65 3 8 161413 8Noneoftheabove 59 4 5158 5Noneoftheabove 0 33 5 4 5 38 19 None of the above 0 66 6 03952Noneoftheabove0 64 7 0 401113 5Noneoftheabove 69 8 044108 5Noneoftheabove 67 9 044163Noneoftheabove 0 63 10 232283Noneoftheabove 0 65 11 1 2 14 46 None of the above 0 63 12 246256Noneoftheabove 0 61 13 6581Noneoftheabove 00 65 14 022555Noneoftheabove 64 15 26 5 9 11 None of the above 14 65 16 36 Impact fee deferrals 22 Increased height for preferred development types 39 Impact fee credits for tear down and rebuild situations 19 Increased density for preferred multifamily, work or mixed use with residential along the corridor 2 None of the above 118 17 42 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for desired additional) landscaping 37 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for enhanced)building design 22 More flexibility or relief from current standards for redevelopment 3 None of the above 0 104 18 18 Pursue a Community Redevelopment Area CRA)designation 3 Pursue an MSTU to fund improvements to the roadway landscaping,lighting, or signage 39 Community based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program 7 None of the above 0 67 Combined Responses for Image Preference Survey Category Comment Preferred Development Recycle and use the buildings that are already vacant.This corridor is the throughway to the only everglades in the world be careful.Boutique newspaper shop bookstore.Coffee shop maybe fifth avenue café could open a satellite shop.Green market indoors flowers and fruit,big box ideas music center", guitar store where costco was going to go. Preferred Development Create a downtown"for east naples festivals, gatherings,local performance groups,walk about park. Preferred Development Lucky's market was an excellent kind of business and destination,we need more like this. Preferred Development Barnes and Noble small best sellers only order other books delivered next day to shop.Coffee Shop/café Preferred Development Bed Bath and Beyond,Christmas Tree Shop,IKEA Preferred Development Love what was done on Collier and 41 Great Job.If we do more like this further down,let's get different stores,resturants that are more unique so it will draw interest to our unique area.Big resturants like Texas Roadhouse are so popular and we find ourselves drawn there for that.Same w/Hobby Lobby and the like. More tropical settings that speak to where we live,Let's consider new theater. Preferred Development Please bring in more restaurants,homegoods,Trader Joes,Costco,Whole Foods.We need more dining and entertainment choices.It’s a hike to go north,especially in season traffic. Preferred Development Would be nice to have smaller boutiques sub cottage type uses Preferred Development Urban suburban context makes answering difficult as what is appropriate for one is inapppropriate for the other. Preferred Development Need to take in to account that the Downtown area may grow rapidly East as a financial center. Infrastructure Infrastructure first!We cant support more growth without better infrastructure. Traffic Plan for traffic.Year round residents should be able to access their own community. Traffic Think speed limit on 41 east beyond rattlesnake needs to be addressed it is 50+mph not condusive for patrons of commercial to ingress and egress highway.Some for residential. Traffic Concerns of traffic on corridor from new developments Traffic Roads must grow with development Traffic Stop lights on the corridor are too much. Bikes Pedestrians All new development should take pedestrian and bike traffic into consideration.Bike/walking trails sheilded from vehicle traffic and landscaped with shade trees is needed. Walkway over or tunnel under 41 to provide greenway for those of us who are willing walk/bike and recreate within the urban environment. Landscaping Bikes Pedestrians A reason this area impressed me was the beautiful boulevard areas on the roadway and the natural landscaping in the medians.Natural walkable pathways and bike paths appeal to me.Easy access into and out of shopping centers. 10/3/17 Public Meeting - Written Comments Page 1 Category Comment 10/3/17 Public Meeting - Written Comments Landscaping Less trees need to be used for landscaping.Landscape maintenance and impeding traffic flow is an issue. Landscaping now blocks visibility on roads to turn left. Landscaping We need landscaping on 951 from rattlesnake to 41 Landscaping Landscaping,medians are developed,what about roadside?Will new old developers abide by these policies? Landscaping Landscaping makes a difference Incentives Can we have an incentive to refurbish reuse Incentives Existing buildings no impact fees? Incentives Impact deferral fees for workforce housing Incentives Use of redevelopment of current,vacant buildings seems ideal.Is there an incentive for prosective developers to use these buildings. Incentives Can we have no impact fees for revamping an existing building? Rebranding Would love to see corridor viewed as community friendly. Rebranding Branding area with a name like Trail NET)with signature signage.A bookstore with café. Rebranding Preferred Development Rebrand the east trail as south naples"used by several businesses like Carrabba's perhaps at Rattlesnake South. Need a Costco,Homegoods and Trader Joes and local restaurants.Sell the descreasing seasonaility of the trail more permanent this has kept cost out. Design No increased height. Design Keep it tropical and light colored. Design Current businesses keep building empty and still are collecting rent makes the area look undesirable to other businesses.Freedom square old k mart. Design What lends to corridor improvement?Visual Improvement Design See DPZ's Sprawl Repair Manual Open Space These ideas are all in a contemporary manner for SW Florida.You could go the other way and claim an environmental sensitive area with no efforts at all.Blue zone and unique to Florida. Page 2 11/7/ 17 Public Input Meeting Summary Page 1 U.S. 41 Corridor Study Public Input Meeting #2 Summary November 7, 2017 – Eagle Lakes Community Park (6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.) The second public input meeting was at Eagle Lakes Park on November 7, 2017. Sign in sheets indicate approximately 50 meeting attendees were present. The meeting format, presentation, and survey were the same as the October 3, 2017 public meeting, except that the survey was updated with some options for participants to select “all of the above” as a response, and a question about take out or sit down restaurants was added to the survey. Laura DeJohn, Principal Planner with Johnson Engineering and Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director of Collier County Growth Management, summarized the U.S. 41 Corridor Study background and purpose. Laura gave a description of physical characteristics of the corridor, including existing transportation infrastructure, traffic counts, and lot dimensions. Laura summarized the proportions of existing uses and future land use and zoning. Mike discussed demographics and real estate market conditions, followed by an explanation of commercial development patterns. He identified the potential for growth in the vicinity of the corridor including thousands of new dwelling units and substantial new commercial development based on approvals in place for the next five to ten years. He distributed a handout of the County’s current permitting activity, which indicated several new commercial developments in the East Naples vicinity are in the pipeline. Mike identified the trends in Internet shopping and integration of uses to maximize live/work/play opportunities, with an example being the proposed Mini-Triangle development at the intersection of U.S. 41 and Davis Boulevard. Laura concluded the presentation by explaining options for incentives, regulation changes and administrative changes that could impact the look and the type of development along the corridor in the future. She highlighted the meeting schedule for the next public meetings and next steps for the study. The public meeting schedule included the addition of a third public input meeting on January 16, 2018 to allow for more seasonal participants, and the final meeting for presentation of findings and recommendations was set for February 21, 2018. Several questions were raised by the audience. There were concerns raised about vehicular traffic and congestion, and pedestrian safety. Concern was noted about the high traffic congestion levels during peak months of the year. The concept of re-branding East Naples as “South Naples” was raised by one attendee. The desires expressed by some attendees for destinations such as sit-down restaurants were discussed relative to the concern that increased development will be detrimental to traffic and congestion. Mike Bosi discussed how addition of new destinations along the East Trail could alleviate some time spent in the car travelling a longer distance to reach at those destinations if they are not developed along the East Trail. The next portion of the meeting was the Image Preference Survey. Audience members were given the option to respond to the survey on paper or electronically using cellular devices. Audience members were advised that the results will be tallied with the results of the other two public input meetings and the final public meeting to present findings will be February 21, 2018. Attachments: Image Preference Survey Results, Written Comments, Sign-in Sheets Question A Corresponding Pictures B Corresponding Pictures C Corresponding Pictures D Corresponding Pictures E Corresponding Pictures F Corresponding Pictures Total Received 1 0 9 30 11 None of the above 0 50 2 0 102910Noneoftheabove 0 49 3 621107 5Noneoftheabove 49 4 319710Alloftheabove10 None of the above 49 5 41196Alloftheabove19 None of the above 49 6 0 0 23 24 None of the above 0 47 7 0206166Noneoftheabove 48 8 1299 6 3Noneoftheabove 48 9 2357 5Noneoftheabove 0 49 10 213322Noneoftheabove 0 49 11 0 3 18 26 None of the above 0 47 12 191126Alloftheabove10 None of the above 48 13 22814Alloftheabove4 None of the above 0 48 14 265323Noneoftheabove 48 15 03296Alloftheabove1 None of the above 39 16 18127Alloftheabove18 None of the above 46 17 4 Impact fee deferrals 23 Impact fee credits for tear downand rebuild situations 0 Increased height for preferred development types 0 Increased density for preferred development types 17 All of the above 4 None of the above 44 18 23 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for desired additional) landscaping 9 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for enhanced)building design 7 More flexibility or relieffrom current standards for redevelopment 6 All of the above 1 None of the above 46 19 4 Pursue aCommunity Redevelopment Area CRA)designation 6 Pursue an MSTU to fund improvements to the roadway landscaping,lighting, or signage 17 Community based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program 17 All of the above 2 None of the above 46 Combined Responses for Image Preference Survey Category Comment Preferred Development We need a Mercato Center” Something nice and upscale Preferred Development Need a Home Goods and a Costco Preferred Development Chain restaurants are OK only if they are higher quality. Preferred Development We need a Costco,Sam’s or Trader Joe’s Preferred Development We need more fine restruants to draw people in to our area. Preferred Development More local restruants,Costco,Car Wash,Petite Clothes store Preferred Development I would love to see mixed use development and restruaunts. Preferred Development 2 Wawa's and Racetracs are enough gas stations.Hotels and nice restraunts are sorely needed. Incentivize redevelopment of the small 1 story motels to improve the appearance and rebranding. Preferred Development Home Depot,Movie theater,Chick Fil A,Home Goods,Sams,Costco,Red Lobster,Famous Daves Preferred Development Overall look of a small town would be nice.This could include new 1 and 2 story buildings,restruants,and landscaping by businesses. Preferred Development Home Depot,Costco,Home Goods,Chick Fil A could be added in another area on the same road. Preferred Development BJ's,Target we have enough gas stations,storage facilities and fast food restraunts Preferred development Costco,Sam's Club,Sit Down Nice Resturants,Destination Shopping,Target Preferred Development The development of cultural venue upscale restruants and shopping Community Theaters,Museum,Children's venues educational community Preferred Development Please bring in Seasons 52 Restruant, Pier 1 store,Home Goods,Crate and Barrel,Sam's,BJ's or Costco Preferred Development Indoor Green Marketplace Preferred Development Satellite U.S.post office,5th Ave Café satellite shop,Naples Pub III Satellite Preferred Development Would like to see things like Target,Bed Bath and Beyond,Costco and Home Goods. Preferred Development More local restaurants. Preferred Development Need Target,Costco and Bed Bath and Beyond. Preferred Development We could use a nice gym. Preferred Development Bookstore maybe a Barnes and Nobles Satellite shop Preferred Development Newspaper shop/coffee shop Preferred Development Need good restaurants. Preferred Development Bookstore and Target 11/7/17 Public Meeting - Written Comments 1 Category Comment 11/7/17 Public Meeting - Written Comments Preferred Development Make sure you speak to local developers and Council Realtors about their thoughts on what can be successful Redevelopmen The corridor is so shabby that it is embarrassing to drive with guests.Abandoned buildings must be removed! NOT Preferred Development No more chain restruants, pawn shops,gas stations or cube storage. NOT Preferred Development There is much talk about affordable housing for Naples East Naples already has its share. Rebranding Form our own City. Rebranding East Naples should be branded as a Resort Area" Rebranding Rename area to South Naples” Rebranding East Naples Village" Rebranding Perhaps consider East Naples South Naples" Rebranding Prospective slogan Best of Everything” Rebranding Rename this area of Naples to South Naples"and the perception may change for East Naples,resulting in positive Rebranding I strongly feel that East Naples has a negative connotation.Perhaps it is with good cause due to the current shape of the corridor.I am very supportive of a renaming or a rebranding effort. Rebranding Rebranding is the most critical thing that needs to happen.Need to change image as well as build what people want.A consistent style might help i.e. charming,modern or artsy). Traffic Traffic especially during season.It's already bad",more people will make it worse".Possible other/better sideroads, sidewalks,etc. Traffic More roads,different travel options Traffic Always consider traffic add traffic lights where nessecary.Lights keep people safe.Insert bike lanes,consider bike paths further removed from the roads. Bikes Pedestrians Remember those biking and walking Bikes Pedestrians Need to coordinate HOW we get to these places with less individual cars.Pedestrian/Bicycle over passes 2 minimum needed.Improve quality and frequency of buses. Bikes Pedestrians I would like to see a greater emphasis on making East Naples more of a walkable/bikeable community.East Naples is in desperate need of wider sidewalks at least 7 feet),wider bike lanes or shared use paths,lighting and mid block crossing. There are many folks that bike or walk to downtown Naples and need safe ways to do so.Creating a walkable/bikeable community can also draw retail. Bikes Pedestrians Any development must take into account alternative forms of transportation bicycle and pedestrians). Incentives All incentives are okay,but the most incentives should beprovided to those that tear down existing eyesores. Incentives Reduce impact fee’s for certain identified uses. Incentives Perpetuate the impact fee moratorium for change of use when a building is torn down. Incentives Investigate additional incentives to attact businesses and development i.e.bond sales for tax increment financing of improvements) Incentives Increased density in Coastal High Hazard for rental community. Open Space East Naples could be a area where outdoor recreation is emphasized.No need to pave over paradise.If you want North Naples move there. Open Space Open space is an advantage for East Naples,carefully planned development is a must. 2 1/ 16/ 18 Public Input Meeting Summary Page 1 U.S. 41 Corridor Study Public Input Meeting #Summary JJanuary 16, 2018 – Eagle Lakes Community Park (6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.) The third of three public input meetings was held on January 16, 2018 at Eagle Lakes Community Park. This meeting was scheduled as an additional opportunity to capture input from seasonal residents. Sign in sheets indicate approximately 24 meeting attendees were present. The meeting format, presentation, and survey were the same as the November 7, 2017 meeting. Laura DeJohn, Principal Planner with Johnson Engineering and Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director of Collier County Growth Management, summarized the U.S. 41 Corridor Study background and purpose. Laura gave a description of physical characteristics of the corridor. Questions and concerns were raised about traffic and the nature of the roadway being an inhospitable large roadway under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) jurisdiction. Another concern was the safety of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Mike explained pedestrian improvement opportunities based on a recent visit to the corridor from transportation planning expert Dan Burden. Laura described how the FDOT has adopted a Complete Streets program that is more responsive and willing to work with local jurisdictions on the design of the roadway to match the community character. This means that FDOT’s polices are now more adaptable for roadway designs to be slower, calmer, or more pedestrian friendly in an area where a community has adopted urban type development or redevelopment plans. Concern about the concentration of lower income housing in East Naples was also raised. Laura proceeded to give a description of physical characteristics of the corridor, including existing transportation infrastructure, traffic counts, and lot dimensions. She summarized the proportions of existing uses and future land use and zoning. Mike discussed demographics and real estate market conditions, followed by an explanation of commercial development patterns. He identified the potential for growth in the vicinity of the corridor including thousands of new dwelling units and substantial new commercial development based on approvals in place for the next five to ten years. He referenced the County’s current permitting activity, which indicated several new commercial developments in the East Naples vicinity are in the pipeline. Mike identified the trends in Internet shopping and integration of uses to maximize live/work/play opportunities, with an example being the proposed Mini-Triangle development at the intersection of U.S. 41 and Davis Boulevard. A meeting attendee brought photos of vacant commercial units along the corridor to highlight the issue of underutilized existing commercial space. 1/ 16/ 18 Public Input Meeting Summary Page 2 Laura concluded the presentation by explaining options for incentives, regulation changes and administrative changes that could impact the look and the type of development along the corridor in the future. She highlighted the next step for the study is the final meeting for presentation of findings and recommendations set for February 21, 2018. The next portion of the meeting was the Image Preference Survey. Audience members were given the option to respond to the survey on paper or electronically using cellular devices. Audience members were advised that the results will be tallied with the results of the other two public input meetings and the final public meeting to present findings will be February 21, 2018. Attachments: Image Preference Survey Results Written Comments Sign-in Sheets Question A Corresponding Pictures B Corresponding Pictures C Corresponding Pictures D Corresponding Pictures E Corresponding Pictures F Corresponding Pictures Total Received 1 05108Noneoftheabove0 23 2 06152Noneoftheabove0 23 3 741011Noneoftheabove 23 4 1834Alloftheabove7 None of the above 23 5 2063Alloftheabove12 None of the above 23 6 00914Noneoftheabove0 23 7 012461Noneoftheabove 23 8 017132Noneoftheabove 23 9 0177 0Noneoftheabove 0 24 10 07132Noneoftheabove0 22 11 02812Noneoftheabove0 22 12 2065Alloftheabove9 None of the above 22 13 0129Alloftheabove 2 None of the above 0 23 14 020192Noneoftheabove 23 15 00200Alloftheabove3 None of the above 23 16 12 0 0 4 All of the above 5 None of the above 21 17 2 Impact fee deferrals 12 Impact fee credits for tear down and rebuild situations 1 Increased height for preferred developmenttypes 0 Increased density for preferred development types 5 All of the above 5 None of the above 25 18 9 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for desired additional) landscaping 6 Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for enhanced) building design 2 More flexibility or relief from current standards for redevelopment 5 All of the above 3 None of the above 25 19 4 Pursue aCommunity Redevelopment Area CRA) designation 4 Pursue an MSTU to fund improvements to the roadway landscaping, lighting, or signage 4 Community based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program 7 All of the above 4 None of the above 23 Note questions 2,9,17,18, and 19. Combined Responses for 1-16-18 Image Preference Survey Category Comment Preferred Development More than anything we’d my family)would love to see a Whole Foods where we live,and I stop grocery shopping instead of going to 3 different local stores.I even emailed the company 5 years ago asking them to build here. Preferred Development Costco,Chipotle,Bed Bath Beyond Preferred Development We love Mercato this area needs some upscale. Preferred Development Need more sit down eating establishments.Upscale.Less storage facilities on main drag. Preferred Development Restaurants the nicer the better Preferred Development Post office needed in this area Preferred Development Request:J.Alexander Restaurant my favorite and many others from the Preferred Development Changes should be made to laws that does not allow big tracts of land that are purchased long ago should have to be looked again for feasibility and if it still fits with the community Preferred Development STOP I don’t want to be North Naples with all of the density,traffic,lack of walking,biking areas,etc.Keep green space create SIDEWALKS,BIKE PATHS,etc.)MODERATION is the key.Please Listen. NOT Preferred Development No more buildings and gas stations. NOT Preferred Development Please no more low income housing. NOT Preferred Development 5 gas stations enough!) NOT Preferred Development 5 burger restaurants enough!)more upscale business needed to accommodate the upscale communities in the area Open Space/Bikes Pedestrians Safe and easier biking and walking in the area. Open spaces and bike paths. Open Space/Bikes Pedestrians Must link green space to provide a transportation corridor for bikes/pedestrians.Curb cuts on 41 pose greatest dangers to bikes/pedestrians.Would be good to have service corridors off 41,perhaps behind commercial development,dedicated to bikes and pedestrians.Also,need to be strategically placed over pass/underpass for pedestrian/bike crossings.Slowing traffic probably not an option.Just provide safe spaces for East traveling West pedestrians/bikes. Bikes Pedestrians Bike paths are important to my family Infrastructure Water is going to be a major issue if building keeps going at this rate Traffic Don’t create a situation which we can’t get out of our communities because of two much traffic and lack of traffic lights.Add a traffic light at 41 Lely Resort Blvd. Traffic I love South Naples but find myself driving to North Naples all the time and its exhausting Rebranding East Naples is HUGE!Can we be called South East Naples or South East Trail Area?Something to uniquely identify the area. 1/16/18 Public Meeting - Written Comments AATTACHMENT 3 FINAL PUBLIC MEETING PRESENTATION, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND SIGN-IN SHEETS 2/21/2018 1 U.S.41 Corridor Study Johnson Engineering,Inc. Prepared By For Collier County Findings and Recommendations 2/21/2018 2 Survey Results are cumulative based on responses received at Public Input Meetings: October 3,2017 70participants November 7,2017 50participants January 16,2018 24participants 1.Would you like to see more strip malls like any of these along the corridor? 0%29%51%20% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 3 1.Would you like to see more strip malls like any of these along the corridor? 51% 2.Would you like to see more of any these types of hotels/lodging? 1%29%59%10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 90% 2/21/2018 4 2.Would you like to see more of any these types of hotels/lodging? 59% 3.Do you like any of these styles of hotel? 22%31%26%16%11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 89% 2/21/2018 5 3.Do you like any of these styles of hotel? 31% 4.Would any of these residential buildings be okay along the corridor? 9%40%17%18%16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All of the above None of the above 84% 2/21/2018 6 4.Would any of these residential buildings be okay along the corridor? 40% 58% 5. Would any of these residential buildings be okay along the corridor? 7%4%46%7%36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All of the above None of the above 64% 2/21/2018 7 5.Would any of these residential buildings be okay along the corridor? 46% 53% 6.Do you feel any of these storage facilities are acceptable along the corridor? 0%2%31%67% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 8 6.Do you feel any of these storage facilities are acceptable along the corridor? None of the above 67% 7.Do you find any of these views appealing? 0%51%15%25%9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 9 7.Do you find any of these views appealing? 51% 8.Which building scale do you find acceptable for the corridor? 1%65%14%12%7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 10 8.Which building scale do you find acceptable for the corridor? 65% 9.Which of these options do you like for building placement along the roadway? 1%71%22%6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 11 9.Which of these options do you like for building placement along the roadway? 71% 10.Which of these landscape conditions do you like? 3%38%54%5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of theabove92% 2/21/2018 12 10. Which of these landscape conditions do you like? 54% 11.Would any gas station shown here be acceptable along the corridor? 1%5%30%64% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above 2/21/2018 13 11.Would any gas station shown here be acceptable along the corridor? 64% None of the above 12.Would you like to see any mixed use buildings like this along the corridor? 34%5%33%8%19% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All of the above None of the above 81% 2/21/2018 14 12.Would you like to see any mixed use buildings like this along the corridor? 34% 33% 75% 13.Would you like to see more chain restaurants or more local restaurants along the corridor? 6%72%17%5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% None of the above All of the above Chain Restaurants Local Restaurants 95% 2/21/2018 15 13.Would you like to see more chain restaurants or more local restaurants along the corridor? Local Restaurants 72% 89% 14.Would you like to see more retail in any of these forms? 1%7%5%79%7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Corner Store Strip Mall Outlet Center Destination Shopping None of the above 2/21/2018 16 14.Would you like to see more retail in any of these forms? Destination Shopping 79% 15. Would you like to see more drive through,take out,or sit down restaurants? 0%5%79%10%6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Drive Through Take Out Sit Down All of the above None of the above 94% 2/21/2018 17 15.Would you like to see more drive through,take out,or sit down restaurants? Sit Down 79% 89% 16. Would you like to see any buildings along the corridor? 42%5%8%17%28% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All of the above None of the above 72% 2/21/2018 18 16. Would you like to see any buildings along the corridor? 42% 59% 17.Do you agree with any of these incentives to encourage preferred development types? 22%30%21%10%12%6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Impact fee credits for tear down and build situations Impact fee deferrals for target industries or uses Increased density for preferred development types Increased height for preferred development types None of the aboveAlloftheabove 94% 2/21/2018 19 17.Do you agree with any of these incentives to encourage preferred development types? Impact fee credits for tear down and situations 30% 42% 18.Do you agree with any of these regulatory ideas for the corridor? Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for enhanced)building design Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for desired additional) landscaping All of the above More flexibility or relief from current standards for redevelopment None of the above 42%30%18%6%4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 96% 2/21/2018 20 18.Do you agree with any of these regulatory ideas for the corridor? Corridor Overlay zoning district to add standards for desired additional)landscaping 42% 48% 19.Do you agree with any of these administrative changes for the corridor? 19%10%44%18%10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pursue an MSTU to fund improvements to the roadway landscaping,lighting, or signage Pursue a Community Redevelopment Area CRA)designation All of the above Community based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program None of the above 90% 2/21/2018 21 19.Do you agree with any of these administrative changes for the corridor? Community based branding effort to establish an identity and marketing program 44% 62% Written Comments October 3,2017 36 received November 7,2017 52 received January 16,2018 20 received 2/21/2018 22 Subjects of Written Comments Preferred Development Rebranding Traffic Bikes Pedestrians NOT Preferred Development Incentives Redevelopment Design Landscaping Infrastructure Open Space Redevelopment October 3,2017 Subjects of Written Comments Preferred Development 29% Rebranding 9% Infrastructure 3% Traffic 14%Bikes Pedestrians 3% Landscaping 11% Incentives 14% Open Space 3% Design 14% 2/21/2018 23 Preferred Development 50% Redevelopment 2% NOT Preferred Development 4% Rebranding 17% Traffic 6% Bikes Pedestrians 8% Incentives 9% Open Space 4%November 7,2017 Subjects of Written Comments January 16,2018 Subjects of Written Comments Preferred Development 45% NOT Preferred Development 20% Rebranding 5% Infrastructure 5% Traffic 10% Bikes Pedestrians 15% 2/21/2018 24 Findings from Surveys and Comments Priority Topics Main Points Community identity East Naples residents support branding the area to make the assets of the area known and attract more of what the community wants. New and different businesses are desired: Hotel/Resort,Grocery options,Wholesale Club,Restaurants Any change must be part of a framework that controls for appearance,intensity and traffic. Transportation The corridor has too much traffic and not enough safe bicycle and pedestrian features and open space. Redevelopment Improvement to unsightly,older buildings and vacant commercial buildings is needed. Landscaping Enhance the appearance along the roadside. Findings:Changes are Happening Incremental changes occur as more housing develops and population increases to support commercial businesses. 2/21/2018 25 Findings:Future changes can be planned Repair”of the Commercial Strip 1. Identify nodes for centers of activity and more desired uses these should be at intersections and relate to transit or trolley stops. 2. Connecting streets should be incorporated in plans and provide for bicycles and pedestrians. 3. Establish standards and incentives for: Nodes or activity centers with possibility for mixed use,variety of live work play uses,structured parking and open spaces or greens” Enhanced aesthetics between the nodes Gulfgate Plaza Redevelopment Opportunity Courthouse Shadows Redevelopment Walmart Renovations ACTIVITY CENTER Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Intersection improvements 2/21/2018 26 ADD ANNOTATIONS TO MAP Future Multifamily Vacant Commercial Sites Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Naples Towne Center Redevelopment Opportunity New Development ACTIVITY CENTER ACTIVITY CENTER Redevelopment Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route Opportunity ADD ANNOTATIONS TO MAP Isles of Collier Preserve NaplesManorTrevisoBay Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route Opportunity Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route St.Andrews Square ACTIVITY CENTER OPPORTUNITY 2/21/2018 27 Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route Opportunity Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route ACTIVITY CENTER OPPORTUNITY Vincentian PUD New Development Eagle Lakes Park Lely Resort Victoria Falls Eagle Lakes Park Bike/Pedestrian Friendly Alternate Route Opportunity New Development Opportunities New Development ACTIVITY CENTER ACTIVITY CENTER OPPORTUNITY 2/21/2018 28 Collier County Government Complex Activity Center Thomasson/Rattlesnake Hammock Activity Center St.Andrews Square Activity Center Vincentian/Eagle Lakes Park Activity Center Collier Blvd/US 41 Activity Center OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY Collier County Government Complex Activity Center Thomasson/Rattlesnake Hammock Activity Center St.Andrews Square Activity Center Vincentian/Eagle Lakes Park Activity Center Collier Blvd/US 41 Activity Center OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY 2/21/2018 29 2/21/2018 30 Planning for the Future Community Character Plan Redevelopment of Naples Towne Center 2/21/2018 31 Collier County Policies for Redevelopment and Infill 2/21/2018 32 2/21/2018 33 2/21/2018 34 Sheltered pedestrian paths Active pedestrian promenade Local Restaurants Destination Shopping Recommendations 1)Community based branding project Civic and Business organizations work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. 2)Desired businesses: County Growth Management Department to provide information to development community about preferred uses. 2/21/2018 35 Recommendations 3) Transportation Needs Identify opportunities to use connecting street for bicycles and pedestrians. Coordinate with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan to identify locations for new sidewalks,bikeways,transit and greenways and connections to serve the corridor. Design criteria to promote secondary corridors to connect to commercial and mixed use centers. Coordinate with Transportation Planning and Florida DOT on the options for retrofitting bicycle and pedestrian enhancements,starting with intersections. Recommendations 4) Redevelopment:Ensure impact fee credits for tear down and situations.New development will meet Collier’s architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. 5)Identify target locations or nodes”for allowing preferred new types of development and redevelopment Activity Centers:Confirm or expand 3 existing at Airport Road;Thomasson/Rattlesnake; Collier Boulevard;and addition of 2 opportunities at St Andrews Square and Vincentian PUD/Eagle Lakes Park Apply Redevelopment/Infill standards for Mixed Use Destinations and Hotels in these focused locations along the corridor Gas station or self storage development:Consider separation requirements,location standards or minimum retail or office mix as part of these developments to mitigate for proliferation along this corridor. 2/21/2018 36 Recommendations 6) Landscaping:Roadside landscaping enhancement strategy Review options for enhanced roadside landscaping in the right of way Substitute the standards for landscaping in front yards for better curb appeal” based upon a landscape plan specific to conditions of U.S.41 East Next Steps Collect feedback from tonight’s meeting April 24 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Present Findings and Recommendations Report Ask for Board’s direction to move forward with Recommendations 2 through 6 Finalize Findings and Recommendations Report 2/21/2018 37 Your Feedback Comment Cards Recommendations Recap 1) Community based branding project Civic and Business organizations work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. 2)Desired businesses:County Growth Management Department to provide information to development community about preferred uses. 3)Transportation Needs Identify opportunities to use connecting street for bicycles and pedestrians. Coordinate with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan to identify locations for new sidewalks,bikeways, transit and greenways and connections to serve the corridor. Design criteria to promote secondary corridors to connect to commercial and mixed use centers. Coordinate with Transportation staff Florida DOT on options for retrofitting enhancements,start with intersections. 4)Redevelopment:Ensure impact fee credits for tear down and situations.New development will meet Collier’s architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. 5)Identifytarget locations or nodes”for allowing preferrednew types of development and redevelopment Activity Centers:Confirm or expand 3 existing at Airport Road;Thomasson/Rattlesnake;Collier Boulevard;and addition of 2 opportunities at St Andrews Square and Vincentian PUD/Eagle Lakes Park Apply Redevelopment/Infill incentives and standards for Mixed Use Destinations and Hotels in these locations Gas station or self storage development:Consider separation requirements,location standards or minimum retail or office mix as part of these developments to mitigate for proliferation along this corridor. 6)Landscaping:Roadside landscaping enhancement strategy Review options for enhanced roadside landscaping in the right of way Substitute standards for landscaping in front yards for better curb appeal”specific to conditions of U.S.41 East CCategory Comment Traffic / Redevelopment Traffic on the East Trail is expanding, more year-round residents, therefore increasing traffic. Where you expect to have bike trails andwalking areas, as time goes on the danger of people being hit by cars increase. I fear ultimately we will end up looking like Miami. Don't need new developments - need reuse & redevelopment of existing structures only. NOT Preferred Development / Rebranding Nice Job! Heard comments about lack of county's openness to "bans". Can we be more firm then on minimum distances between things like storage facilities? An extended approval process isn't enough deterrent to keep E. Naples from becoming the "warehouse district". Also, fully support rebranding "East Naples" to "South Naples". Again, thanks!! Bike & Peds Possibly elevated walkways "over US 41" to cross over to other side of street and activity centers. Enjoy the information being shared Rebranding / Preferred Development To give an identity - focus on the Naples-Everglades existence. Pursue pedestrian bridges. Bookstore needed - there are10 in Sarasota only 1 in Naples. For new housing emphasize families with kids to change the population of local schools to be more economically diverse. With added landscaping include benches. Identify "South Naples". NOT Preferred Development/Bike Peds East Naples doesn't need more rental properties, affordable housing, market safe housing & mutli-family housing. It needs more "owned" properties with a range of values-modest to high-end properties. Bike/pedestrian development along adjacent roads to hwy 41a fair idea but a) must connect EW to downtown Naples and b) must account for added traffic along these new bike paths associated with added residential development. Rebranding Need to change the poor perception of East Naples by renaming it South Naples. Why is this beautiful building [South Regional Library] we are in named as such? Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse! Preferred Development I believe multi-family housing provides a great opportunity for young real-estate investors & families, and provides housing for people working in consumer & retail business Preferred Development/Bike & Peds More workforce housingisneeded for young professionals. In addition, a mix of uses we can bike/walk to. Bike & Peds/Rebranding Report's findings are encouraging. Node development iskey for walkability + reduce auto-dependence. Make node development a priority. Create mechanisms to plan + execute branding efforts. Create many tools to get where you want to go. Traffic/Bikes & Peds/Preferred Development Traffic lights to favor those who're driving the 41, not switching to red as soon as a single car wants to get out of a small mall. More street sign to identify parks, etc. Open another Costco (if volume of business justify). Not enough biking lane (safe lane). Electronic boards along streets to enforce/inform (speed, traffic congestion, etc.) Rebranding / NOT Preferred Development County Commissioners aredoing nothing to change the image of East Naples. Homeowners have been saying the same thing for years - no more gas stations, storage facilities, and low-income housing. Where has it got us - nowhere! Commissioners don't care. Preferred Development/NOT Preferred Development It would be nice if the low income housing was dispersed to N Naples instead of E Naples being the dumping ground - we're already full here. Trader Joes would be nice in the area. NOT Preferred Development Thank you for engaging East Naples residents in the project plan. Unfortunately we were shut out of the residential mixed use (market plan) development. This is undesirable and will undermine the entire plan. No one wants anymore disgusting housing - enough. We are over-saturated - putin another district. We will fight to stop the housing oversaturation. Preferred Development/NOT Preferred Development No mixed use/no market rate housing. We are oversaturated - from 48 East Naples Condo Association Boards + Presidents. 1)Concert Hall 2)Marriott Resort 3)Recreation Park. NOT Preferred Development Please stop the low income housing. Get Habitat for Humanity out of our community and neighborhoods. Habitat for Humanity is ruining our district. NOT Preferred Development Need middle income housing, not more low income Preferred Development/NOT Preferred Development/Open Space Please keep as much open space, natural vegetation as possible. Less "strip malls". More larger name store like Costco, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond are need. Other / Open Space For what its worth: Remember that the people who live in low income housing are the workers from your grocery stores, retail, etc. These people do not need to be abused with ignorance of the populace. Also, please quit filling in the areas that were made for nature because of development. Contrary to popular belief we need nature to survive. Bikes & Peds Build bike paths off the main streets. Build pedestrian and bike overpasses. Other cities do it all the time. One can bike/hike from Pittsburgh, PA to Washington, DC without encountering car traffic. Provide shuttle service and better handicap service. Handicap service is horrible in Collier County. Please keep in mind the environmental impact, we need birds to eat mosquitos. 2 -21-2018 Public Meting - Written Comments 04/24/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to accept the US41 Corridor Study as a supplemental planning tool, and direct staff to begin the implementation of the informational and short term recommendations, and prepare follow-up items with a more detailed plan for the long term recommendations for future Board direction. OBJECTIVE: To review the findings and recommendations contained in the US41 Corridor Study and provide direction upon the findings and recommendation for future action. CONSIDERATIONS: During the February 14, 2017, public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) directed staff to engage the community in a public planning process to determine the commercial land uses most desired by the community and develop incentives to promote those desired land uses. Through a series of public meetings, the emphasis was upon identifying the specific types of businesses currently located on the Corridor and creating a baseline, with emphasis upon traffic infrastructure (roadways design) influence on commercial market viability and attraction. With Coordination with the East Naples Foundation, CRA, and other stakeholder’s groups, Staff developed a public meeting schedule. The recommendations provided for within the final report were based upon feedback received from over 200 participants at four publicly advertised community meetings, based upon direct feedback to a visual preference survey and written comments. The Community meetings dates and locations are provided below: Public Meeting 1 - October 3, 2017 - East Naples Community Park Public Meeting 2 - November 7, 2017 - Eagles Lakes Community Park Public Meeting 3 - January 16, 2018 - Eagles Lakes Community Park Final Public Meeting - February 21, 2018 - South Regional Library Based upon the input provided at the above public planning meetings, the Study provides for the following recommendations: INFORMATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Community based branding project -Civic and Business organizations should work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. 2) Desired businesses - The County Growth Management Department should provide information to the development community about outcomes of the Study and uses that are preferred. SHORT TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 3) Redevelopment and development standards - a) New development will meet Collier County’s architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. b) For gas station or self-storage development, consider separation requirements, location standards or minimum percentages of retail or office mix as part of these developments to mitigate for proliferation along this corridor. 11.D Packet Pg. 343 04/24/2018 4) Landscaping -Implement a roadside landscaping enhancement strategy. a) Substitute standards for landscaping in front yards for better “curb appeal” specific to conditions of U.S. 41 East. b) Review options for enhanced roadside landscaping in the right-of-way. LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION 5) Identify target locations or “nodes” for allowing preferred new types of development and redevelopment. a) Confirm or expand the 3 existing Activity Centers: Airport Road; Thomasson/Rattlesnake; Collier Boulevard. b) Consider addition of 2 new minor Activity Center opportunities at: St Andrews Square and Vincentian PUD/Eagle Lakes Park. 6) Transportation Needs a) Identify opportunities to use connecting street for bicycles and pedestrians. b) Coordinate with the Collier MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan to identify locations for new sidewalks, bikeways, transit and greenways and connections to serve the corridor. c) Establish design criteria to promote secondary corridors to connect to commercial and mixed use centers. d) Coordinate with County Transportation staff & Florida DOT on options for retrofitting enhancements, start with intersections. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact related to the acceptance of the US Corridor Study. The cost associated with any of the suggested recommendations will be accounted for within the fiscal year budget of the Zoning Division or the General Fund. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Acceptance of the Study as an additional planning tool fulfills the Growth Management Plan’s policy 4.1 (Future Land Use Element) for “Planning studies may address specific geographic areas.” If directed, certain recommendations may require amendments to the GMP for full implementation. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority vote for Board action. -HFAC RECOMMENDATION: To accept the US41 Corridor Study as a supplemental planning tool, and direct staff to begin the implementation of the informational and short term recommendations, and prepare follow-up items with a more detailed plan for the long term recommendations for future Board direction Prepared by: Mike Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. [Linked] 04-03-18 - Summary of Findings and Recommendations Memo (PDF) 11.D Packet Pg. 344 04/24/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.D Doc ID: 5175 Item Summary: Recommendation to accept the US41 Corridor Study as a supplemental planning tool, and direct staff to begin the implementation of the informational and short term recommendations, and prepare follow-up items with a more detailed plan for the long term recommendations for future Board direction. (Mike Bosi, Director, Zoning Division) Meeting Date: 04/24/2018 Prepared by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 03/20/2018 4:46 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 03/20/2018 4:46 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 03/26/2018 2:21 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 04/09/2018 8:19 AM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 04/10/2018 1:41 PM Growth Management Department James French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 04/13/2018 1:58 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 04/16/2018 7:51 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 04/16/2018 8:29 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 04/16/2018 8:43 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 04/17/2018 2:40 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 04/24/2018 9:00 AM 11.D Packet Pg. 345 April 24, 2018 Page 1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida, April 24, 2018 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Andy Solis William L. McDaniel, Jr. Donna Fiala Burt L. Saunders Penny Taylor ALSO PRESENT: Leo Ochs, County Manager Nick Casalanguida, Deputy County Manager Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney Crystal Kinzel, Director of Finance & Accounting Troy Miller, Communications & Customer Relations Page 1 April 24, 2018 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRAB) Airport Authority AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 April 24, 2018 9:00 AM Commissioner Andy Solis, District 2 - BCC Chair Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Dist. 5 - BCC Vice-Chair; CRAB Co-Chair Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1; CRAB Co-Chair Commissioner Burt Saunders, District 3 Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. ALL REGISTERED SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE 3) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THECHAIRMAN. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER “PUBLIC PETITIONS.” PUBLIC PETITIONS ARE LIMITED TO THE PRESENTER, WITH A MAXIMUMTIME OF TEN MINUTES. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD Page 2 April 24, 2018 WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2003-53 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24, REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THECLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION LOCATED AT 3335 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 1, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Reverend Edward Gleason of Trinity By The Cove Episcopal Church 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended (ex parte disclosure provided by commission members for consent agenda.) B. March 27, 2018 BCC Meeting Minutes C. April 3, 2018 BCC/CRA Workshop Meeting Minutes 3. AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS A. EMPLOYEE Page 3 April 24, 2018 B. ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS C. RETIREES 4. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation designating Saturday, April 28, 2018 as Tamiami Trail Day in Collier County. To be accepted by Patricia Huff, President of the Friends of the Museum of the Everglades. B. Proclamation designating May 2018 as Military Appreciation Month in Collier County. To be accepted by representatives of the military. 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS A. Public Petition request from Ave Maria Development, LLLP, (Richard D. Yovanovich representing Barron Collier Companies), requesting that the Board of County Commissioners discuss the Town of Ave Maria commitment to provide a public facility site for Fire, Sheriff, EMS and County facilities. B. Public Petition request from Ms. Marlene Sherman requesting that the Board of County Commissioners "sunset" the Radio Road Beautification MSTU Ordinance 96-84) and related ordinances. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS NOT ON THE CURRENT OR FUTURE AGENDA 8. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2006-50, the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Page 4 April 24, 2018 Planned Unit Development (CPUD), as amended, by adding outdoor recreation facilities as a general permitted use; by providing that wellness centers associated with employees and hotel guests shall not count towards square footage maximums in the business district and industrial commercial district; by allowing a 169 room hotel on Tract 6 west of Goodlette Frank Road; by decreasing the allowable square footage in the industrial commercial district by 6,900 square feet for a total of 709,100 square feet of floor area of industrial/commerce uses; by decreasing the allowable square footage in the business district by 23,000 square feet to 269,000 square feet including a reduction from 242,000 square feet to 219,000 square feet of office uses; by adding indoor and outdoor recreational facilities as a permitted accessory use in the business district and industrial commercial district; by adding deviations to allow any use on Tracts 3 and 6 on the master plan to be eligible for the county’s architectural deviation process and a deviation to permit existing street trees to satisfy the buffer tree requirements for Tract 5. The subject property is located south of Immokalee Road and both east and west of Goodlette Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 106 acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20170000425] B. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 81-6, as amended, the Marco Shores Golf Course Community Planned Unit Development (PUD), to allow group housing for seniors on Residential Parcel Two A, and to add new development standards for Residential Parcel Two A; and providing for an effective date, for property located near the Marco Island Executive Airport in Section 26, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PUDA- PL20170001345] C. This item was continued from the April 10, 2018 BCC meeting. Recommendation to approve the attached ordinance governing the Collier County and Municipal Infrastructure One-Cent Sales Surtax or One-Cent Sales Tax, and direct staff to work with the Collier County Supervisor of Elections Office to submit the ballot language for the referendum to appear on the General Election ballot November 6, 2018. Page 5 April 24, 2018 10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 11. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. This item to be heard immediately following Item #9C. This Item was continued from the April 10, 2018 BCC Meeting. Recommendation to authorize staff to continue implementation of the Community Housing Plan CHP) by performing the following: (1) direct the County Attorney to advertise an amendment to Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances related to Impact Fee Deferrals; (2) approve a resolution to supercede Resolution No. 07-203 which established an Affordable- Workforce Housing Trust Fund and establish a new Local Housing Trust Fund; (3) direct staff to initiate the process to establish the creation of a Community Land Trust; (4) direct staff to initiate a nexus study to determine appropriate linkage fees on new development of various types as well as the maximum feasible fees development can support in light of existing fees and other factors; (5) direct staff to develop an affordable housing plan including marketing, public relations, and communications. (Total Fiscal impact: 245,000 over two (2) years) (Cormac Giblin, Grants and Housing Development Manager; Community and Human Services Division) B. Recommendation to review the Ninth Conservation Collier Active Acquisition List and consider its potential impact on program finances, to provide direction to the County Manager or his designee after reviewing the staff presentation on the A- Category list, and to provide direction on future cycles. (Alexandra Sulecki, Coordinator, Conservation Collier Program) C. This item was continued from the March 27, 2018 meeting. Recommendation to reestablish the “Tickets to Ride” Program and authorize staff to develop a standard use agreement to be made available to all willing vendors for Collier County citizens recreational amenities for All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) use in Southwest Florida at a cost not to exceed $20,000 annually and suspend site evaluations. (Barry Williams, Division Director, Parks and Recreation Division) D. Recommendation to accept the US41 Corridor Study as a supplemental planning tool, and direct staff to begin the implementation of the informational and short term recommendations, and prepare follow-up items with a more detailed plan for the long term recommendations for future Page 6 April 24, 2018 Board direction. (Mike Bosi, Director, Zoning Division) E. Recommendation to award ITB No. 18-7276 Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan “Immokalee Road (Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard) Landscape and Irrigation Installation” to Hannula Landscaping and Irrigation, Inc. for $1,512,274.87 (Project No. 60208). (Joe Delate, Principal Project Manager, Road Maintenance Division) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Recommendation that the Board consider an ordinance amending the Board’s general Advisory Board Ordinance to institute term limits on advisory boards. 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY AND/OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A. AIRPORT B. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Proposed BCC Future Workshop Schedule 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to approve a resolution amending Ordinance No. 2004-66, as amended, that created an Administrative Code for Land Development, by amending Chapter Two, Legislative Procedures, Page 7 April 24, 2018 more specifically to amend Section B, Land Development Code Amendment - Privately Initiated Text Amendments, to modify application procedures for privately initiated land development code amendments; and providing an effective date. 2) Recommendation to approve a no cost First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Naples and Collier County clarifying post-design duties and responsibilities of the parties for the remaining phases of the joint storm water and sanitary sewer project located between Goodlette-Frank Road and US-41. (Project No. 60142) 3) Recommendation to accept a Grant Award from the US Department of Treasury under the RESTORE Direct Component (Pot 1) for the preliminary development, design and permitting of the Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan in the amount of 1,532,077.76 and authorize necessary budget amendment (Project No 33554). 4) Recommendation to grant final acceptance of the private roadway and drainage improvements for the final plat of Orange Blossom Ranch Phase 1A, Application Number AR-7186 with the roadway and drainage improvements being privately maintained; acceptance of the plat dedications, and authorizing the release of the maintenance security. 5) Recommendation to approve final acceptance and unconditional conveyance of the potable water and sewer utility facilities for Artesia Naples Phase 3B, PL20150002359 and to authorize the County Manager, or his designee, to release the Final Obligation Bond in the total amount of $4,000 to the Project Engineer or the Developer’s designated agent. 6) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Talis Park Golf Course Plat, Application Number PL20170004281. Page 8 April 24, 2018 7) Recommendation to award contracts to Assurance Title Agency, LLC and American Government Services Corporation, under RFP #17- 7200, “Real Estate Title & Closing Services.” 8) Recommendation to approve the partial release of a code enforcement lien with an accrued value of $687,572.47 for payment of $3,822.47 in the code enforcement actions entitled Board of County Commissioners v. Tarpon IV LLC, Special Magistrate Case No. CEPM201000018647 relating to property, Folio No. 39773480009, Collier County, Florida. 9) This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 3, (Application Number PL20170004477) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. 10) Recommendation to award Bid #18-7267 to Coastal Concrete Products, LLC, for the construction of Lely Branch Canal Weir Project, in the amount of $ 444,380, Project No. 60202, authorize the Chairman to execute the Contract, and authorize the necessary budget amendments. 11) Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 14- 6296 in the amount of $99,771.79 with HighSpans Engineering, Inc., for construction engineering inspection (CEI) services for the Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement, Project No 66066. Fiscal impact: 99,771.79 12) Recommendation to hear Land Development Code Amendments at two regularly scheduled daytime hearings and waive the nighttime hearing requirement. B. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY C. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Page 9 April 24, 2018 1) Recommendation to award Bid #18-7235, “HVAC Preventative Maintenance and Repair Services” to Primary and Secondary Contractors; B&I Contractors, Inc. (primary) and Tampa Bay Trane Service, Inc. (secondary) for County-wide HVAC preventative maintenance and repair services for anticipated annual services in the estimated amount of $800,000. 2) Recommendation to award Bid #17-7174, “Sale of Recycled Materials,” to Garden Street Iron & Metal Inc. and A&D Scrap Material Inc. 3) Recommendation to approve the First Amendment to Agreement #17- 7156 and authorize a Sole-Source Waiver for a period of three years for the purchase of Bioxide Plus 71, Aktivox and VX456 from Evoqua Water Technologies LLC for use by the Public Utilities Department Wastewater Division. 4) Recommendation to approve a First Amendment to Lease with Naples HMA, LLC, d/b/a Physicians Regional Medical Center - Collier, to extend the lease term for spaced utilized by EMS as a temporary station house. 5) Recommendation to approve the conveyance of an Easement to Florida Power & Light Co. to supply power to new Master Pump Station No. 167.00 including a three phase transformer, a buried power line, and to provide additional power systems as needed on County-owned property at 15430 Collier Blvd., adjacent to Heritage Bay Commons. 6) Recommendation to approve a Certification of Financial Responsibility, as required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, for the transfer of the operating permit for the deep injection well system for the Golden Gate Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants. 7) Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Sixth Amendment to Contract No. 04-3673 with Carollo Engineers, Inc., f/k/a Carollo Engineers, P.C., pertaining to the design of the Northeast Water Reclamation Facility and Water Treatment Plant, Page 10 April 24, 2018 authorize a purchase order in the amount of $149,943 to Carollo Engineers, Inc. and authorize the necessary budget amendments. D. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to approve Budget Amendments in the amount of 20,526.23 due to a reduction in available program funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Shelter Plus Care (S+C) Grant (net Fiscal impact of $20,526.23). 2) Recommendation to approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase with Dalton Mejia, for 1.14 acres under the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program at a cost not to exceed $14,800. 3) Recommendation for after-the-fact approval of an electronically submitted application for Corporation for National and Community Services (CNCS) Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) 2018- 2021 Renewal Grant in the amount of $163,566 to the CNCS and allow the County Manager or his designee to serve as the authorized representative for the grantor electronic system eGrants throughout the grant period. 4) Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Parks and Recreation Outsourcing of County Marinas Agreement No. 12-5914R to allow other County Departments/Divisions the use of boat docks exempt from the Lease Agreement Requirements of the Agreement. 5) Recommendation to approve the execution of the 2017/2018 Federal Highway Administration Flexible Funds grant award in the amount of 274,000 for the purchase and installation of additional bus shelters through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Award Management System (TrAMS) and authorize the necessary Budget Amendment. 6) Recommendation to approve the selection committee rankings and to authorize entering into contract negotiations for Request for Professional Services (RPS) #17-7249, “Domestic Animal Services Building Design Renovation” (Project #50145), with the top-ranked Page 11 April 24, 2018 firm, ADG Architecture. 7) Recommendation to authorize Budget Amendments for client’s co- payments in the amount of $10,505 for the Community Care for the Elderly (CCE) and Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (ADI) Grants for Collier County Services for Seniors (CCSS) Program from the Area Agency on Aging of Southwest Florida, Inc. (AAA). 8) Recommendation to approve ten (10) mortgage satisfactions for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Loan Program in the combined amount of $80,197.71. 9) Recommendation to approve a Cooperative Agreement #18-7331-PB with Creative Bus Sales, Inc., for the purchase of two (2) trolleys using the Lee County Public Transit Trolleys Request for Proposals RFP) #170058LAC for the Collier Area Transit (CAT) System and execute the Agreement and Notice of Assignment of Option. 10) Recommendation to accept a revised FY17-18 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Grant Award in the amount of 10,977, authorize the necessary Budget Amendments and approve the purchase of four (4) paratransit vehicles and radios using those funds. 11) Recommendation to approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase with Charles Rock and Anne Gendregske at a cost not to exceed 171,300 to purchase the property at 135 Capri Boulevard, adjacent to the Isles of Capri Neighborhood Park for additional parking, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement for Sale and Purchase and staff to take all necessary actions to close and authorize staff to continue negotiations on 145 Capri Boulevard. 12) Recommendation to authorize the execution of the 2017/2018 Federal Highway Administration Flexible Funds grant award in the amount of 316,250 for the purchase and installation of live camera feeds on transit vehicles and onboard WiFi through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Award Management System (TrAMS) and authorize a Budget Amendment. Page 12 April 24, 2018 E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1) Recommendation to approve Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement with Collier County District School Board for the Driver Education Program. 2) Recommendation to approve the administrative report prepared by the Procurement Services Division for disposal of property and notification of revenue disbursement. 3) Recommendation to recognize accrued interest from the period of October 2017 through December 2017 earned by EMS County Grant and appropriate funds for a total amount of $294.55. 4) Recommendation to approve the addition of one (1) classification, the reclassification of three (3) classifications, and the removal of two (2) classifications to the 2018 Fiscal Year Pay & Classification Plan made from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018. 5) Recommendation to approve the Administrative Reports prepared by the Procurement Services Division for change orders and other contractual modifications requiring Board approval. 6) Recommendation to approve expenditures for Temporary Clerical Services from Balanced Professional Staffing, Inc. above the competitive threshold, and authorize purchase orders from multiple County Divisions. F. COUNTY MANAGER OPERATIONS 1) Recommendation to approve a report covering budget amendments impacting reserves and moving funds in an amount up to and including $25,000 and $50,000, respectively. 2) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving amendments appropriating grants, donations, contributions or insurance proceeds) to the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Adopted Budget. 3) Recommendation to authorize Payment of Invoices #2935273 and Page 13 April 24, 2018 2961165 to Trimark Strategic Equipment LLC totaling $223,960 for commercial kitchen equipment and installation services for the Florida Culinary Accelerator @ Immokalee. G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1) Proclamation designating May 2018 as Older Americans Month in Collier County. This proclamation will be sent by mail to Kirsten O'Donnell, Director of Communications - Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida. 2) Proclamation designating May 3, 2018 as National Day of Prayer in Collier County. The proclamation will be read at ceremonies being held on May 3rd at locations in Collier County. I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous Correspondence J. OTHERCONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) To provide the Board of County Commissioners the Clerk of the Circuit Court’s Internal Audit Report 2018-3 Job Creation Investment Program: Arthrex and Arthrex Manufacturing, issued on, April 24, 2018. 2) To record in the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners, the check number (or other payment method), amount, payee, and purpose for which the referenced disbursements were drawn for the periods between March 29 and April 11, 2018 pursuant to Florida Statute 136.06. 3) Request that the Board approve and determine valid public purpose for invoices payable and purchasing card transactions as of April 18, 2018. Page 14 April 24, 2018 K. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation to approve a Joint Motion and Stipulated Final Judgment in the amount of $38,500 for Parcel 455RDUE, in the lawsuit captioned Collier County v. Alex D. Randolph, et al, Case No. 17-CA-1472, required for the Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion Project No. 60145. (Fiscal Impact: $32,940) 2) Recommendation to approve a Joint Motion and Stipulated Final Judgment in the amount of $19,000 for Parcel 453RDUE, in the lawsuit captioned Collier County v. Alex D. Randolph, et al, Case No. 17-CA-1472, required for the Golden Gate Boulevard Expansion Project No. 60145. (Fiscal Impact: $13,370) 3) Recommendation to approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement for the total amount of $132,750 for the taking of Parcel 426RDUE in the pending case styled Collier County v. Leondese Bichotte et al, Case No. 17-CA-1443, required for the Golden Gate Boulevard Project, Project No. 60145 (From Everglades Blvd to east of the Faka Union Canal). (Fiscal Impact: $47,250) 4) Recommendation to approve a Mediated Settlement Agreement in the amount of $27,000 for full compensation for the taking of Parcel 413RDUE, plus $7,913.40 for statutory attorney fees, and $4,500 for expert fees and costs, in the case styled Collier County v. Lourdes Perez Bello, et al., Case No. 17-CA-1390 required for improvements to Golden Gate Blvd. (Project No. 60145). [Fiscal Impact: 36,463.40] 5) Recommendation to approve two Mediated Settlement Agreements in the total amount of $202,052 for full compensation for the taking of Parcels 314RDUE and 325RDUE, including statutory attorney fees, and expert fees and costs, in the case styled Collier County v. CKC Property Holdings, LLC, et al., Case No. 16-CA-1242 required for improvements to Golden Gate Blvd. (Project No. 60145). [Fiscal Impact: $90,622] 6) Recommendation to appoint a member to the Contractors Licensing Board. Page 15 April 24, 2018 7) Recommendation to reappoint two members to the Public Transit Advisory Committee. 8) Recommendation to reappoint two members and reclassify one member of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board. 9) Request by the Collier County Health Facilities Authority for approval of a resolution authorizing the Authority to issue revenue bonds for healthcare facilities at Moorings Park and Moorings Park at Grey Oaks. 10) Request by the Collier County Educational Facilities Authority for approval of a resolution authorizing the Authority to issue revenue bonds to be used to finance educational facilities for Ave Maria School of Law. 11) Recommendation that the Board direct the County Attorney to advertise an ordinance expanding the powers of the Special Magistrate. 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - This section is for advertised public hearings and must meet the following criteria: 1) A recommendation for approval from staff; 2) Unanimous recommendation for approval by the Collier County Planning Commission or other authorizing agencies of all members present and voting; 3) No written or oral objections to the item received by staff, the Collier County Planning Commission, other authorizing agencies or the Board, prior to the commencement of the BCC meeting on which the items are scheduled to be heard; and 4) No individuals are registered to speak in opposition to the item. For those items which are quasi-judicial in nature, all participants must be sworn in. A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning Page 16 April 24, 2018 regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Rushton Pointe RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 229 residential dwelling units on property located on the west side of Collier Boulevard, approximately two thirds of a mile south of Immokalee Road, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 38.1± acres. [PL 20150000306] B. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by providing for: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings of Fact; Section Three, Adoption of Amendments to the Land Development Code, more specifically amending the following: Chapter One General Provisions; Chapter Two – Zoning Districts and Uses; Chapter Three – Resource Protection; Chapter Four – Site Design and Development Standards; Chapter Six – Infrastructure Improvements and Adequate Public Facilities Requirements; Chapter Nine – Variations from Code Requirements; Chapter Ten – Application, Review, and Decision-Making Procedures; Section Four, Adoption of Amendments to the Collier County Official Zoning Atlas, more specifically amending the following: Zoning Map Numbers 522930, 2033N, 2033S, 2034N, 2034S to remove the ACSC designation for consistency with the Growth Management Plan; Section Five, Conflict and Severability; Section Six, Inclusion in the Collier County Land Development Code; and Section Seven, Effective Date. C. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Petition VAC- PL20170001644 to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County and the public interest in the roadway easement recorded in OR Book 2355, Page 2715 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The subject property is located on the east side of County Barn Road, approximately one-quarter mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. D. Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving amendments Page 17 April 24, 2018 appropriating carry forward, transfers and supplemental revenue) to the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Adopted Budget. 18. ADJOURN INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD’S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER’S OFFICE AT 252-8383. April 24, 2018 Page 153 CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Aye. COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Any opposed? No response.) CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Motion carries. MR. WILLIG: Thank you. Item #11D ACCEPT THE US41 CORRIDOR STUDY AS A SUPPLEMENTAL PLANNING TOOL, AND DIRECT STAFF TO BEGIN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INFORMATIONAL AND SHORT TERM RECOMMENDATIONS, AND PREPARE FOLLOW-UP ITEMS WITH A MORE DETAILED PLAN FOR THE LONG TERM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE BOARD DIRECTION - MOTION ACCEPTING THE REPORT – APPROVED MR. OCHS: Item 11D is a recommendation to accept the U.S. 41 corridor study as a supplemental planning tool and to authorize staff to begin implementation. Mr. Bosi will make the presentation. MR. BOSI: Good morning, Commissioners. Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. Just to give you a little bit of context to the individual study, this was directed by the Board of County Commissioners at the beginning of last year, 2017. We had started with the concept of potentially enabling a moratorium on specific land uses. The Board was not comfortable with that approach. They, instead, directed staff to go out and speak with the community, engage them within the public April 24, 2018 Page 154 planning process, and evaluate through various means what type of land uses they would like to see most promoted within the U.S. 41 corridor study. And with that, we went out and engaged the community with the help of Laura DeJohn and Johnson Engineering, who provided a tremendous amount of support and organizational aspects to the study. The U.S. 41 corridor, essentially, was from Palm Street, Commercial Drive, down to Price Street. A better approximation would be 951 and 41, Airport Road and U.S. 41, and that was the area we put the focus study, and that's the area where we have a large amount of leftover commercial strip zoning, shallow lot, but commercial strip zoning along that auto-oriented U.S. 41. We engaged in three publicly advertised meetings: October 3rd, November 7th, and January 16th. Very well attended at the various community facilities within the East Trail area, and we had a wrap-up meeting on February 21st where we provided the results and just went over what we learned from that individual meeting. How we had gained a lot of individual preferences was from a visual survey preference, and for this I really did lean upon Johnson Engineering in terms of there was about 20 different images, and there was three to four images that showed different concepts of building arrangement, landscaping, setback, architectural features, and we asked the audiences to provide feedbacks as to which of those images that they found most appealing, and from those choices, we were able to discern a number of different aspects about community design and what -- the community design that the population would most like to see within that 41 corridor. We also had a second part to each one of those public meetings where we asked for -- or we provided open-ended questionnaires where the participants in the meeting were able to provide us whatever areas that they felt we needed to know about in terms of what their April 24, 2018 Page 155 concern was or where they thought their opportunities were moving forward related to what they would like to see developed. One of the things I learned early on within the process, it's a very hungry crowd out there in the sense that they were very supportive of restaurants, particularly sit-down restaurants. But what we did was from the written comments that we received on October 3rd, the 7th, and on the 16th, we basically took the words, the words that were provided within there, and whichever words came out the most are the ones that you see highlighted within that bubble, that screen. And restaurants, need, traffic, building, corridor, Costco, landscaping development. Those are the type of things that we saw as a common occurrence. And then we grouped those written comments within categories. And the top of the categories were preferred development meaning the type of specific end-users that they would like to see. Rebranding was something that we heard a lot of. Traffic, bikes and pedestrian, not preferred development, incentives to redevelopment, design, landscaping, infrastructures, open space, and redevelopment. A lot of things from a planning concept that you have within emerging corridors but also within parcels of land that may be aging as well. So it was a mix. But those are traditional concepts, but the community was spot on in terms of what they felt they wanted to communicate to us. Based upon that we grouped it into five individual overall messages that we heard from the community. Community identity was one of the first, and East Naples residents support branding the area to make the assets of the area known and attract more of what the community wants. We heard that we felt, or that the area felt that there was a legacy of negativity associated with the East Trail and that the new developments, the activity that has happened recently, needed to be highlighted and accentuated, and the opportunities that the future April 24, 2018 Page 156 holds has to be the focus of how we talk about the corridor and not focusing upon what, maybe, the shortcomings were, but where the opportunities -- and where those opportunities can really be realized to the community's benefits or assets. The second was new and different businesses being desired. Hotel, restaurant, grocery options, wholesale clubs, restaurants, and any change must be part of a framework that controls the appearance of intensity and traffic. Third, as you can imagine, transportation. Transportation was, the corridor has too much traffic and not enough safe bicycle and pedestrian features and open space. And that's one of the things we heard on a regular basis. As you can imagine, a corridor with six lanes, high-moving traffic, they really felt that the other multi-modal aspect of transportation was underserved, meaning your bike and your pedestrian assets, and that will be part of some of the longer-term recommendations we'll get to in a little bit. Also redevelopment. Improvement of unsightly older buildings and vacant commercial buildings is needed. And I think you're starting to see, and we will see moving into the future, a continuing of that trend of re-purposing or reusing existing -- some of the more dilapidated structures or land uses. As part of the larger aspect of our Land Development Code that we do have to engage in, we've developed a redevelopment section within our Land Development Code to a point. But we as plan -- or we as an aging community also recognize that that redevelopment effort has to be moved on, and that's another one of the longer-term recommendations that will be coming from the study. And then third (sic) was landscaping. Enhanced appearance along the roadside. And one of the things that I'm reminded, each of the participants, all the new developments that are coming on, they lift the overall built environment, the feel of the built environment, because April 24, 2018 Page 157 they're meeting our architectural codes, they're meeting our landscape codes, they're providing the required amount of green space and, because of that, each new project has a way of lifting up that immediate surrounding area. The first -- the first two groupings were informational recommendations. The first being civic and business organizations throughout that community, the East Naples Community Association being one of strong community groups out there, one amongst many. Civic and business organizations should work together to establish a theme and identity and then promote the community and its vision. The second desire of businesses, the county's GMD department should provide information to the development community about outcomes of the study and the uses that are preferred. And what we're going to do with that, one, I'm going to provide the Development Services Advisory Council, DSAC, a copy of that written report so they can disseminate it to their members, but also if there's a pre-application meeting that is requested, we'll hand out a courtesy copy of that report just to provide that individual or that business interest an understanding of what the community has expressed the type of land uses that they're looking for and they want to support. The second grouping of recommendations would be short-term recommendations. In the first four of the recommendations we're asking the Board to provide staff direction to move out and develop a plan to take action upon these. Redevelopment and development standards. New development will meet the Collier County architectural and signage standards and further refined redevelopment standards. All of the new development is required to meet your architectural signage and your landscape standards, but we're going to look at the redevelopment section to see where those can be improved, tweaked to bring more of the desired effect of that individual study. April 24, 2018 Page 158 And a second aspect underneath that third recommendation, for gas stations and self-storage development, consider separation requirements, location standards, or minimum percentages of office and retail mix as part of these developments that might mitigate their proliferation along the corridor. One of the things that Commissioner Fiala's expressed frustration with, at least the mini-storage facilities, is they're not daily neighborhood serving. They may serve the needs of the neighborhood from an occasional purpose of where you store your stuff, but you're not interacting with them on a regular day-by-day basis. There could be a component where within the storage facilities, if they were along those corridors, we could require a percentage to be dedicated to office, commercial, retail, something along those lines. But it's something we'll have to evaluate, and we will have to bring back through the advisory boards and then, ultimately, to the Board of County Commissioners for your evaluation. The fourth of the recommendations relates to landscape and implementation of roadside landscape enhancement strategy for that U.S. 41 corridor study. Pam Lu -- engaging with Pam Lulich's group in terms of what are the plans for it. They're recognizing that is a state road, so there's limitations in terms of how much leeway and discretion that we have related to those, and review options for enhancements along the roadside landscaping in the right-of-way. And the long-term recommendations were, one, to not only identify the four activity centers that were -- that sit within that corridor, just confirm their locations, evaluate their expansion, but also consider two individual other locations at St. Andrews Square and the Vincentian PUD, Eagle Lakes Park, see if there -- does it make sense at those two locations to designate similar type of future land use designations that would have -- related to activity centers which have a full range of commercial zoning, but also allows for mixed-use April 24, 2018 Page 159 development -- Commissioner Taylor? COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Yeah, I have a question. The one on Airport Road, will you define the borders of that, which -- what activity center are we talking about there? MR. BOSI: The U.S. 41 and Airport Road, the two corners that abut Airport Road to the east and the west, that's a portion of the activity center. The Courthouse Shadows is included within that activity center as well. I can provide -- I will send your office a copy of that activity center boundary. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: It's just those four corners. At least two of those corners are in the CRA. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: So that would be conflict because that should be left to the CRA because they're master planning that area. MR. BOSI: Yeah. We did -- we touched nothing other than that was a recommendation just to confirm that location. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Is an activity center? MR. BOSI: That's an activity center. Where the -- we were very prudent not to extend to any of the area that the CRA is currently involved within the redevelopment of that CRA plan, so we know that's part of what's going on right now. So we really kind of limited our focus from that area, and it was more towards those areas outside of the CRA. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Yeah. Because the preferred new types of development may not concur with what this master plan comes forward with. That's all. So if you identify the Airport Road area and it's within the CRA, allowing new -- allowing preferred new types of development have not been determined, at least by the CRA's process. MR. BOSI: The type of development that can come forward is April 24, 2018 Page 160 only dictated by your zoning, so we would not be suggesting any changes to the individual zoning that is underneath the purview of the CRA. We know that the redevelopment plan may have some modifications to the land uses allowed within that area that we haven't had an opportunity to be in concert with. We know that that's their bailiwick, and we know that that's an area that they're focused upon. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Okay. My ears perked up when you said when a developer comes in, and then we can hand -- this is what we want. It shouldn't be handed in with Airport Road, because that's the master plan. MR. BOSI: Understood, understood. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Okay. MR. BOSI: And in that regard, we most certainly would direct them to -- COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: The master plan, whatever it becomes. MR. BOSI: -- to the Bayshore CRA for that first conversation. We'd let them know that that's where they need to go first. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Thank you. MR. BOSI: And then, finally, your transportation needs. And your transportation needs are probably your longest in terms of long range, and it has everything to do with the state. That's a state-controlled road. Identify opportunities to use connecting streets for bicycle and pedestrians, and those are some of the opportunities that you develop. The secondary streets that line -- that run parallel to 41, see if those opportunities could be enhanced in any way in terms of pedestrian or bicycle lanes, transportation avenues. Coordinate with the Collier MPO on the pedestrian/bike master plan and identify a location for new sidewalks, bikes, transit, and greenway connections to serve the corridor. Establish design criteria April 24, 2018 Page 161 to promote secondary corridors, as I mentioned, to connect commercial to mixed-use centers, and coordinate with county transportation staff and Florida DOT on options for retrofit and enhancements starting with intersections. One of the things that -- one of the activities that I engaged in related to the restudy was Laura, myself, and Dan Berdin (phonetic) went outside and just crossed U.S. 41 at Airport Road. And what are some of the observations that he had made related to the signalization and how the signalization works and how it was a bit dated. He had said just some simple improvements that can be -- that could be initiated that are low cost, but all of those things will take coordination with the FDOT, so that's just something so we know that that's something that will be an evolving and ongoing process. And, with that, that is the conclusion of the recommendations. I will say, just from a personal note, this is one of my most enjoyable projects that I've worked on with the county. The community was very engaged, they were very interested in the process, and they were -- and they were very -- they were very supportive of the individual meetings that we had, and the end, the wrap-up meeting, I think everyone felt that their time was -- their time was well spent, their voice was being heard. And, as I told Commissioner Fiala during the process, the one lasting legacy that we can walk away from is the community knows that we are interested and we want to promote the visions and the land uses that they want. They are also recognizing there's limitations towards what government can and can't do in terms of picking individual users. But the overall message I received was the community was supportive of the effort and is anticipating and excited to see the changes that have recently come to the U.S. 41 corridor and excited about what is coming into the future. And with that, any questions the Board may have? April 24, 2018 Page 162 CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Commissioner Fiala. COMMISSIONER FIALA: I have no questions but, first of all, I want to tell you you're absolutely right. They were thrilled that you were there. They were thrilled that you were listening to them, that they were being heard, and that they were asking instead of being told what they like. That gave them hope for a better outcome in the end, and that's a good thing. You know, people have to start with excitement about where they're going to be. One of the things we put in place a long time ago was any old buildings that you want to get rid of, you don't maybe have to get rid of, you can invite young businesses, new businesses, floundering businesses to get into one of those buildings with zero, zero, zero impact fees, and that's an enticement to use that place, fix it up, and they'd have the money, because they don't have to pay any impact fees, to then maybe start a thriving business. They -- business is a difficult thing in that area, as Mike well knows, because there aren't many, and people would really like to have places to shop, and the reason is because they would prefer not to shop and go someplace else. They would prefer to stay on the roads that they live on, and that's something else Mike found. So after your successful presentations, then I sent out a little thing. I have this thing called Tidbits. It's just asking for people's opinions or giving people opinions. So I sent this out in Tidbits, and I said, "What would you like to see in this area?" I have about 1,800 people that are, in the Tidbit grouping, and we get 366 answers back in just a two-week period of time, with about a thousand suggestions, which was wonderful. Mike, my assistant, he put them into kind of a cute little form here to see. The ones that stand out the biggest, just like Mike said, restaurants was the biggest one because they need more places to go to eat. April 24, 2018 Page 163 One of the misconceptions that people have had over the years is that they figured, maybe because of the appearance of the area or whatever, that we all needed fast-food restaurants. But these people want to sit down and eat. Most of the people that live out there now are retirees. They've been cooking all their life. They don't want to cook anymore. They want to be taken out to eat. They want to go out to eat with their neighbors. They want to sit down over a meal. And, you know, you don't have that many poor people that want to go out and eat. These people want to go out, and they want to stay here. They don't want to be driving to the north end of town. So restaurants featured big. One of the things we almost had a long time ago was a Target. Where the Kite people now built the Stein Mart, it was supposed to be a Target. Mike, you were probably involved in that where they changed all of that permitting and everything, and then they had to -- but then Target got hit real hard by the hackers, and it really ruined their business for a while, so they pulled out of that shopping center. People were really disappointed appeared because they didn't have a place to go like that. Well, then we were going to get Sam's Club, and they were -- people down in the City of Naples as well as up on Marco Island were really thrilled, the business owners, because they would have had a place to go to buy things in quantity. But then that went by the wayside when the Sam's Club people invested in the Amazon.com. So here is the results of some of their thoughts, and these are just by category. I have it broken down, but there's way too many to give you over here. But I had it broken down into more things that they want specifically in each of these categories as well. So -- and most of all, they were thrilled to know that maybe you would be still involved with us and lead us, because none of us are capable of leading us to where we need to go. We need a leader. We need somebody to help us April 24, 2018 Page 164 through that process and guide us so that we can come up with a positive outcome, and we're just hoping you will. MR. BOSI: Commissioner Fiala, I appreciate the confidence. I most certainly am available, and I serve at the direction of the Board however you want us to move forward with the initiative and follow it up to the next step. As we've recommended, we have two sets of recommendations: Informational and shorter-term. We're asking the Board for staff to go back, develop a plan to engage with the community and come back with results to the Board of County Commissioners related to those areas, and then we will develop a longer-term strategy for those longer-term issues that were contained within the report as well. COMMISSIONER FIALA: That is terrific. Would you mind if I took all the breakdowns of all these different categories and sent them to a few of the shopping center developers to give them ideas of what we would like? MR. BOSI: Well, Commissioner Fiala, you're the commissioner in the district. I think you have the liberty to do so. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: You can do whatever you like. You're the boss. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Okay. Well, I would like to do that, too, so that maybe, if anybody's interested, we could pass that on to you as well. Right now we've got a proliferation, and more coming all the time, with more new storage units. I don't know, how many do we have now, 11? Somewhere right in that area. MR. BOSI: I think there was 10 that were located within the East Trail area. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yeah, plus the flea market that's coming on down the road, too. Yeah, there's quite a few. And you can only use so many. I'm wondering how long they'll go before they April 24, 2018 Page 165 realize that they're going to go broke, because there's going to be so many of them. And gas stations, we've got four more now coming on. But it will be nice to see something other than that on our road. So, Mike, we're going to see if we can't get together with you right away and start the process. Thank you. Folks, he was great. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Thank you. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Is my light on? CHAIRMAN SOLIS: It's not staying on, but I see it. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Well, first off, I was going to ask Commissioner Fiala how she felt about the corridor study, but we're not going to go there. Thank you so much for sharing. And I just have a question -- I have a question for you, number one, and that is I find it interesting, and I've gotten several emails, about a mini-storage unit that's coming up apparently out on the East Trail. Why is there an objection to these? They're very low intensity, low traffic, maybe don't service the wants of the necessary community COMMISSIONER FIALA: That's the reason. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. So I just was wondering why -- COMMISSIONER FIALA: What they're hoping, instead of so many -- you know, because even with the number of people we have, I don't think we're going to use all of those storage units. I think it's -- you know, what they'd really like is something that they can use, something they can go to the movie in or sit down in dinner at or buy a dress in. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Gotcha. I saw your list there, and I just -- April 24, 2018 Page 166 COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yeah. So -- and storage units, and they're all three stories now that are coming in. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Sure. COMMISSIONER FIALA: So they almost create a canyon effect, and that isn't very inviting. And if you're a restaurant, do you want to locate between two storage units? See, that's another thing. Or maybe a storage unit and a gas station. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Yeah. It was just a question that I had. And then the second question that I had was maybe for staff. And there's been some discussion about a specific overlay for East Naples with a master plan similar to what we have with Golden Gate Estates. COMMISSIONER FIALA: That's what we're doing here. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: This is all the precept to get to this point for this actual overlay? MR. BOSI: Those are conversations I've not been a part of. I've been a part of the study. That may be what -- the conversation Commissioner -- COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: That's why I'm asking the question. MR. BOSI: -- Commissioner Fiala wants to speak to me -- COMMISSIONER FIALA: Surprise. MR. BOSI: -- about. But that would be something that we would have to have a full discussion with the Board of County Commissioners about. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Okay. Well -- and it was a question that I was asking, because I've been -- the weeds have been talking, and I knew that there was -- the accolades were going along, and positively, with the corridor study. And the last point that I wanted to make to you was thank you for considering doing this, going through the process, engaging the April 24, 2018 Page 167 residents of Eastern Collier County. This is -- this is a shift from how we had been conducting business in the past with the moratoriums and that sort of thing, and you flinched a little bit last year when we suggested this. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Oh, I still do. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I know you do. But I wanted to say thank you, because this is the -- this is the advent of good governance, engaging the people and letting them know through an educational process what zoning rights, what property rights currently exist. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Are left. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Are left, and what they can, in fact, be used for. So thank you, again. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Is there a motion to accept? COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: I'll make it -- well, let her do it. COMMISSIONER FIALA: I'll make a motion to accept. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: There's a motion and a second. All in favor, say aye. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER TAYLOR: Aye. COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Aye. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Any opposed? No response.) CHAIRMAN SOLIS: Thank you. Great job. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Thank you for indulging us. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: I think we're ready for a break for our court reporter. MR. OCHS: Yes, we are. April 24, 2018 Page 168 CHAIRMAN SOLIS: So we'll be back at 3:20. I have to make a call. A brief recess was had.) MR. OCHS: Mr. Chairman, you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: And just before we start, I may have to duck out and take a call, and I will -- if I do, I will leave it in the capable hands of the vice chair. COMMISSIONER McDANIEL: And we will endeavor to persevere. Item #11E AWARDING ITB NO. 18-7276 COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN “IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER BOULEVARD TO WILSON BOULEVARD) LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION” TO HANNULA LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION, INC. FOR 1,512,274.87 (PROJECT NO. 60208) – APPROVED MR. OCHS: That takes us to Item 11E, Commissioners. This is a recommendation to award a contract for median landscaping along Immokalee Road between -- where are we going -- between Collier Boulevard to Wilson Boulevard in the amount of $1,512,274.87 to the lowest responsive bidder, Hannula Landscaping, and Mr. Joe Delate, your principal project manager can make a presentation or respond to questions to the Board or stand there looking handsome and wait for a motion. CHAIRMAN SOLIS: It is a great tie, by the way. COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS: Mr. Chairman, unless there's some questions or anything, I'll make a motion to approve the staff recommendation. LockUpSelfStorage 5 t h A V E S Bayshore DRAIRPORT PULLINGRDSThomasson DR Tamiami TRLECounty Barn RDTa mia mi T R L E Davis BLVD Collier BLVDRattlesnake Hammock RD Da visBLV D CollierBLVDCollierBLVDCollier BLVDDavisBLVD5th AVE S SantaBarbara BLVDD avis B LV DCollierBLVDTamiami TRLE Tamia miT RLE Rattlesnake Hammock RDSanta BarbaraBLVDCounty BarnRDCollier BLVDCollierBLVDBayshoreStorageCubesmartself storage StoreSmartSelf Storage Cubesmartself storage Carls - WhiteGlove PersonalStorage U-Haul Moving& Storageof Naples RattlesnakeHammock Selfstorage Vincentian MPUDSelf Storage(ZVL-HEX 16-40)TREETOPS FALLINGWATERS BEACHRESORT VINCENTIANVILLAGE MINI-TRIANGLEMPUD Document Path: C:\GIS\DataRequest\GIS Request\ LDC\US-41 SelfStoreageBuildings Map. mxd Map Date: 3/ 21/2019 GrowthManagement DepartmentOperations & RegulatoryManagement Division I 0 1,400 2,800700 Feet Price St.PalmSTSELF-STORAGE BUILDINGS ON US 41Legend PROJECT LIMIT( U.S 41/PRICE ST.)PROJECT LIMIT(U.S. 41/ AIRPORT-PULLING RD)Self-Storage Building ( HEX Decision)Self-Storage Building 1, 320 Buffer FLU Activity Center Parcels December 10, 2019 Self-Storage Facilities on the East Trail 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred History 2016 Moratorium Considered 2017 Corridor Study 2018 Corridor Study Recommendation: Separation Standards 2019 LDC Amendment Presented to BCC 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred Previous Direction 9/10/2019 1.To not advertise ordinance with separation standards. 2.Create incentives for commercial on 1st floor self-storage and/or locating self-storage behind commercial. 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1234 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred Current Code Not permitted in C-1 through C-3 Conditional Use in C-4 Permitted Use in C-5 PUDs in Corridor Architectural Code Applies 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred Current Locations 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1236 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred Potential Incentives •Conditional Use →Permitted use (mixed use only) C-4 Zoning District •Reduce required parking and landscape buffer (mixed use only) Incentivize mixed use 11.F.3 Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Staff Presentation (10848 : Self-Storage Buildings (Incentives for Preferred