The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 10/22/2019 Item # 8A 8A COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To:Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: x Normal legal Advertisement Other: (Display Ad: The advertisement MUST NOT BE placed in that portion of the newspaper where classified advertisements appear. Originating Dept/Div: GMD/Zoning Person:Legacy:Michael Bosi Comp Planning Manager Date:September 24,2019 Petition No.(If none,give a brief description): PL20190001155 Petitioner:(Name&Address): Adamczyk Law Firm,PLLC-Mark E.Adamczyk Esq. 9130 Galleria Court,#201 Naples,FL 34109 Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by the Clerk's office: (if more space is needed,attach separate sheet) Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date:Collier County Board of County Commissioners(BCC)at 9:00 A.M.,October 22,2019, (Based on advertisement appearing 20 days before hearing. Newspaper(s)to be used:(Complete only if important): xxx Naples Daily News Account#068779 Other Legally Required Purchase Order No.4500195266 Proposed text:(include legal description&common locations&size: Legal Section Non-Legal Section Companion petition(s),if any&proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes No. If yes,what account should be charged for advertising costs: 131-138326-649100-00000 Reviewed By: Date: et fl'g/17 ivision Ad •strator or Designee List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS For hearings before BCC or BZA:Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note:if legal documents Is involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file:to Requesting Division Original B. Other hearings:initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office,retaining a copy file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE l Date Received ��1 t-�__.._ Date of Public Hearing iO �LC/ta4-1Date Advertised /cL/10 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 11:39 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda; SmithCamden; ClarkeThomas Subject: Ad Request for PL20190001155 - The Orchards INTP Attachments: Ad Request.docx; Signed Ad Request .pdf Importance: High Good afternoon, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience.This is of the utmost importance. Ad must run on 10/2. Thank you in advance, lieezafediza eada401,41 Operations Coordinator-Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2658 Note: Email Address Has Changed Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.Iv/CollierZoning. Coker County Exceeding Expectations Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22,2019,in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room,third floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Appeal. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.. The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,INC.FILED AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIRECTOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUBDIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST, IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20190001155] A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing.All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT&COMPTROLLER By: /s/Patricia Morgan Deputy Clerk(SEAL) 8A Corporate Acct #505868 September 26, 2019 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: INTP-PL20190001155 — The Orchards Dear Legals: Please advertise the above Legal Ad on Wednesday, October 2, 2019 and send the Affidavit of Publication, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500195266 8A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Appeal. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. FILED AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIRECTOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUBDIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD,EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST,IN COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20190001155] A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WILLIAM L.MCDANIEL,JR.,CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) Crystal K. Kinzel �Gc�,T couRT�� Collier County 8 A � °�, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller r 3315 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 Naples, Florida 34112-5324 toy' l��FR coiNrpt,,o+ September 26, 2019 Adamczyk Law Firm, PLLC Attn: Mark E. Adamczyk, Esq. 9130 Galleria Court #201 Naples, FL 34109 Re: INTP-PL20190001155 — The Orchards Dear Petitioner, Please be advised the above referenced petition will be considered by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Tuesday, October 22, 2019. A legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, October 2, 2019. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, CRYSTAL KINZEL, CLERK Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone-(239)252-2646 Fax-(239)252-2755 Website-www.CollierClerk.com Email- CollierClerk@collierclerk.com 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 11:56 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: INTP-PL20190001155 (BCC 10-22-19).doc; INTP-PL20190001155 The Orchards (BCC 10-22-19).doc Legals, Please advertise the attached Legal Ad on Wednesday, October 2, 2019. Thanks Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II ivo t ea kr Office: 239-252-8411 �.�` Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 'r, of 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite#401 �'4'<<K,cc."` Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com 1 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx <GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 11:56 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Thank you For Your Email External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Thank you for contacting the legal department. This is a general response to inform you that your email has been received. All Legal Notices will be processed for desired publication date if received by the correct deadline time. Office Hours: Monday-Friday, 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM CST Thank you, Legal Notice Department 1 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx <GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:06 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, Please find attached your order confirmation and proof of the ad. Your ad is set to run in: • Naples Daily News on Oct 2 $518.00 The total cost is$518.00, which includes an affidavit which will be mailed to you after the ad publishes. Please reply by Oct 1 at 12 noon with changes of the ad. You will receive an affidavit 7-10 business days after the last day of printing. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Office: 239-263-4700, option 3 From:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:56 AM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: 3814281- INTP-20190001155 -The Orchards Legals, Please advertise the attached Legal Ad on Wednesday, October 2, 2019. Thanks 1 8A N 1 3 .iu DI w PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK BCC ZONING DEPARTMEN 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112- Account AD# Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due 1303809 0003814281 $518.00 $0.00 $518.00 Invoice $0.00 $518.00 Sales Rep: kthor Order Taker: kthor Order Created 09/26/2019 Product #Ins Start Date End Date NDN-Naples Daily News 1 10/02/2019 10/02/2019 NDN-naplesnews.com 1 10/02/2019 10/02/2019 *ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION 8A Text of Ad: 09/26/2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)will con- sider the enactment of a County Appeal. The meeting will com- mence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Appeal is as fol- lows: ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. FILED AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTER- PRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIREC- TOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUB- DIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- MENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST, IN COLLIER COUN- TY,FLORIDA.[PL20190001155J A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limit- ed to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or or- ganization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in pre- sentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WILLIAM L.MCDANIEL,JR.,CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K.KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) Pub Date:10/2/2019 #3814281 8A Teresa L. Cannon To: NeetVirginia; CasanovaAlexandra; SmithCamden Subject: FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Please review Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II Office: 239-252-8411 �� (r•1, Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County r �,�.c ri• 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite#401 `' Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx<GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:06 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 -The Orchards External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, Please find attached your order confirmation and proof of the ad. Your ad is set to run in: • Naples Daily News on Oct 2 $518.00 The total cost is$518.00, which includes an affidavit which will be mailed to you after the ad publishes. Please reply by Oct 1 at 12 noon with changes of the ad. You will receive an affidavit 7-10 business days after the last day of printing. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:31 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Revision to the Appeal ad below. Dinny Virginia A. Neet, FRP Office of the Collier County Attorney Telephone (239)252-8066 - Fax (239) 252-6600 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:30 PM To: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155-The Orchards Dinny, Per Heidi, she would like the following change in the fifth/sixth line of the first paragraph: ...The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider an Appeal. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP, CRIt4 Office of the County Attorney (239) 252-8400 From: NeetVirginia<Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:57 PM To:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 3814281- INTP-20190001155-The Orchards Heidi: See attached for your approval. 8A Teresa L. Cannon To: GRSC-West-Legals mbx Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: INTP-PL20190001155 The Orchards (BCC 10-22-19).doc Legals, There is one small correction to this request. I have attached a revised version with the highlighted correct wording. Any questions, please contact me. Thanks Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II `s• \T it Office: 239-252-8411 Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com r. Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County %, �,�� 3299 Tamiami Trail E, Suite#401 `kcemri.`" Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx<GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:06 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155-The Orchards External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, Please find attached your order confirmation and proof of the ad. Your ad is set to run in: • Naples Daily News on Oct 2 $518.00 The total cost is$518.00, which includes an affidavit which will be mailed to you after the ad publishes. Please reply by Oct 1 at 12 noon with changes of the ad. You will receive an affidavit 7-10 business days after the last day of printing. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ 8A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider an Appeal. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. FILED AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIRECTOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDNANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUBDIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD,EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST,IN COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20190001155] A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WILLIAM L.MCDANIEL,JR.,CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) Teresa L. Cannon Q From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx <GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:48 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, I have made the correction and the updated proof is attached. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Office: 239-263-4700, option 3 From:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:38 PM To: GRSC-West-Legals mbx<GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 -The Orchards Legals, There is one small correction to this request. I have attached a revised version with the highlighted correct wording. Any questions, please contact me. Thanks Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II pn (I/kr Office: 239-252-8411 .f`�.y Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County yAS, 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite#401 Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com 1 8A � it 3 c � cwt PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK BCC ZONING DEPARTMEN 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112- Account AD# Net Amount Tax Amount Total Amount Payment Method Payment Amount Amount Due 1303809 0003814281 $511.00 $0.00 $511.00 Invoice $0.00 $511.00 Sales Rep: kthor Order Taker: kthor Order Created 09/26/2019 Product #Ins Start Date End Date NDN-Naples Daily News 1 10/02/2019 10/02/2019 NDN-naplesnews.com 1 10/02/2019 10/02/2019 *ALL TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED PAID IN FULL UPON CLEARANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTION 8A Text of Ad: 09/26/2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)will con- sider an Appeal. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. FILED AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTER- PRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIREC- TOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUB- DIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- MENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST, IN COLLIER COUN- TY,FLORIDA.[PL20190001155] A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limit- ed to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or or- ganization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in pre- sentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WILLIAM L.MCDANIEL,JR.,CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K.KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) Pub Date:10/2/2019 #3814281 8A Teresa L. Cannon To: NeetVirginia; CasanovaAlexandra; ClarkeThomas Subject: FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Please review - Revised proof Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II `Roof couktd, Office: 239-252-8411 .`4` ��1Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County r'%,,� ��. 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite#401 'rccnmrsi•• Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx<GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:48 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155-The Orchards External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, I have made the correction and the updated proof is attached. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Office: 239-263-4700, option 3 From:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:38 PM 1 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 11:10 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: CasanovaAlexandra Subject: [WARNING: UNSCANNABLE EXTRACTION FAILED]FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Importance: High Teresa: See below. Dinny Virginia A. Neet, FRP Office of the Collier County Attorney Telephone (239) 252-8066 - Fax (239) 252-6600 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: BellowsRay<Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 10:56 AM To:CasanovaAlexandra <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; SmithCamden <Camden.Smith@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155-The Orchards Importance: High Hi Alex, I have reviewed the attached ad proof and have approved it. Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division -Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co tier County Exceeding expectations, every day! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT. 8A Teresa L. Cannon From: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 9:43 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: CasanovaAlexandra Subject: FW: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Attachments: OrderConf.pdf Teresa: See below. Dinny Virginia A. Neet, FRP Office of the Collier County Attorney Telephone (239)252-8066 - Fax(239) 252-6600 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 9:41 AM To: NeetVirginia<Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 3814281- INTP-20190001155-The Orchards Approved! ! 7leidic y, c,n-Vic&o Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Office of the Collier County Attorney 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-8400 From: NeetVirginia <Virginia.Neet@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 9:36 AM To:AshtonHeidi<Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: CrotteauKathynell<Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezWanda <Wanda.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: 3814281- INTP-20190001155-The Orchards See attached. 1 8A Teresa L. Cannon To: GRSC-West-Legals mbx Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 - The Orchards Legals, The Revised proof for Ad #3814281 looks good, OK to run. Thanks Teresa Cannon BMR Senior Clerk II cot. Office: 239-252-8411 •zs �f? Fax: 239-252-8408 Teresa.Cannon@CollierClerk.com Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court &Comptroller of Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail E,Suite#401 4(01,nri• ' Naples, FL 34112-5746 www.CollierClerk.com From: GRSC-West-Legals mbx<GRSC-West-Legals@gannett.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 3:48 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: 3814281 - INTP-20190001155 -The Orchards External Message: Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or replying to this message. Hi Teresa, I have made the correction and the updated proof is attached. Thanks, Kia Thor Public Notice Representative Naples Daily News I LOCALiQ PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Office: 239-263-4700, option 3 From:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Sent:Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:38 PM 1 8A Public Notices �,.. Hie Public Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING W Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the z Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, GNaples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)will con- sider an Appeal. The meeting wilt commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: so d ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. FILED AN APPEAL Q TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTER- _ PRETATION PL20190000062 RENDERED BY THE ZONING DIREC- TOR WHICH INTERPRETATION PROVIDES THAT THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS rn AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT p CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO N THE RESIDENTS OF THE ORCHARDS SUBDIVISION THROUGH OLD ri GROVES ROAD IN THE PIPER GROVE PHASE ONE AND TWO SUB- DIVISIONS TO AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY w IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- MENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, EAST OF O AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION 1, T~ TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST, IN COLLIER COUN- TY,FLORIDA.[PL20190001155] A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file'with the a '., • Board and is available for inspection. All interested`laffr!`are w invited to attend and be heard. Z NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limit- ed to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or or- ganization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in pre- sentations before the Board will become a permanent part of r 0 P rn O Public Notices I i Public Notices re w the record. m Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board U will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and O therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the > proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, , at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, i (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the X Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS u N COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WWILLIAM L.MCDANIEL,JR.,CHAIRMAN W CRYSTAL K.KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon = Deputy Clerk(SEAL) Pub Date:10/2/2019 03814281 8A N.a is JaiIij - 'lits PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BCC ZONING DEPARTMEN T Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamlami Trail, Naples FL.,the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will con- NAPLES,FL 34112 sider an Appeal. The meeting will commence at 9:00,A.M. The title of the proposed Appeal is as follows: ORCHARDSCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,INC.FILED AN APPEAL Affidavit of Publication TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALSOF THE OFFICIAL INTER- PRETATION PL20190000062 RENDEREDBY THE ZONING DIREC TOR WHICH INTERPRETATIONPROVIDESTHAT THE VINEYARDS COUNTY OF BROWN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NO. 85-15 AS AMENDED, AND THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DO NOT REQUIRE VEHICULAR ACCESSBE PROVIDED TO Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, THE RESIDENTS7FTHE ORCHARDSSUBDIVISIONTHROUGHOLD personally appeared said legal clerk who on oath says that GROVESROAD IN THE PIPERGROVEPHASEONE AND TWO SUB p Y 9 Y DIVISIONSTO AIRPORT-PULLINGROAD.THE SUBJECIPROPERT he/she serves as Legal Clerk of the Naples Daily News, a IS THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP dailynewspaper at Naples, in Collier County, MENT LOCATED SOUTH OF VANDERBILTBEACH ROAD,EASTOF publishedP Y AIRPORTROAD AND WESTOF LIVINGSTON ROAD IN SECTION1, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH AND RANGE 25 EAST,IN COLLIERCOUN- that the attached copy of the advertising was published in TY,FLORIDA [PL20190001155] said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the A copy of the proposed Appeal is on file with the Clerk to the said Naples DailyNews is a newspaper at Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are Ppublishedinvited to attend and be heard Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuouslypublished in NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the said agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limit- ed to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to Y speak nn behalf of an organization or group Is encouraged. If counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or or- second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in ganizatlon may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an tram. said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in preceding the first publication of the attached copy of the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall paid norpromised anyperson, or corporation anydiscount, be submitted to the appropriate County stall a minimum of rP seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in pre- rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing sentations before the Board will become a permanent part of this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board Published:October 2,2019 will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and — –r—l"C- evidence upon which tho appeal is based. II you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in under to participate inn this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you. to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, locat- ed at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples,FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices Tor the hearing impaired are available in the Gl x a 1'V 1 uv'r 4-l rx_( Board of County Commissioners Office. Notary,State of WI,County of Brown BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA TAFiA MC)NI:)LOCH WILLIAM L MCDANIEL,JR.CHAIRMAN Nulary Public Stoleof Wisconsin CRYSTAL K KINZEL, CLERK OF THE COURTS By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) My commission expires August 6,2021 Pub Dale:1012/2019 #3814281 Publication Cost:$511 00 Ad No:0003814281 Customer No: 1303809 PO#: PL20190001155 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 8 A TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. **NEW** ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature,draw a line through routing lines#1 through#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office. Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office _ Initials Date 1. 2. 3 County Attorney Office County Attorney Office a( 4. BCC Office Board of County k.01 }-k { Commissioners \r// \o 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office /00S16 1°1141 PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above,may need to contact staff for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Staff Ray Bellows,Zoning Manager Phone Number 252-2463 Contact/ Department Agenda Date Item was 10/22/194_____--- Agenda Item Number 8A Approved by the BCC Type of Document Resolution Number of Original Attached ' Documents Attached PO number or account number if document is to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A"in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) I. Does the document require the chairman's original signature? ' •-\ C1 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for additional signatures? If yes, N/A provide the Contact Information(Name;Agency;Address;Phone)on an attached sheet. 3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be RB signed by the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. 4. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's N/A Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the RB document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's RB signature and initials are required. 7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing slip ' should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is input into SIRE. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain raC-: time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 8. The document was approved by the BCC on 10/22/19 and all changes made RB N/A is not during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County an option for Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable. - this line. 9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by the r N/ is not BCC,all changes directed by the BCC have been made,and the document is ready fo they/ an o tion for Chairman's signature. e. I:Forms/County Forms/BCC Forms/Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04,Revised 1.26.05,Revised 2.24.05;Revised 11/30/12 8A MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2019 To: Ray Bellows, Manager Comprehensive Planning - GMD From: Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2019-205: Denying Petition ADA-20190001155/ INTP-20190000062 Attached for your records is a copy of the document referenced above, (Item #8A) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 22, 2019. The Minutes and Record's Department has held the original resolution for the Board's Official Record. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 252-8411. Thank you. Attachment 8A RESOLUTION NO. 19— 2 5 A RESOLUTION DENYING PETITION ADA-PL20190001155, WHICH APPEALED THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION INTP- PL20190000062 CONCERNING OLD GROVES ROAD, LOCATED IN THAT PART OF THE VINEYARDS PUD WHICH IS SOUTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD AND WEST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County; and WHEREAS, Mark Adamczyk, Esq., representing The Orchards Community Association, Inc., filed Petition ADA-PL20190001155 on May 13, 2019, which appealed the official interpretation PL20190000062 rendered by the Zoning Director which determined that the Vineyards Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 85-15 as amended, and the Collier County Land Development Code, do not require vehicular access be provided to the residents of the Orchards subdivision through Old Groves Road; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals (the Board), held a properly noticed public hearing to consider Petition ADA-PL20190001155; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board has fully considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition Number ADA-PL20190001155, filed by Mark Adamczyk, Esq., on behalf of The Orchards Community Association, Inc., is hereby DENIED in accordance with the record of the proceedings of the public hearing held before the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals, on October 22, 2019, and the official interpretation PL20190000062 is hereby affirmed. [19-CPS-01860/1505081/11106 10/22/19 8A BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted by the Board upon majority vote this 22nd day of October, 2019. ATTEST-,,,p* .'Rc)0 ,a: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CRYS. ,.A . KTNZEL, CLERK COLLIER CO.; ORIDA i 1 t; ;. 4 `? "ye^, t 7'10.ChtililletiSty Clerk W',lam L. McDaniel, Jr., Ch.irman Approved as to form and legality: 1A A ( (o H 'di F.Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney item# 6. Agenda _ ,o"_"�/ Date Date a Recd 0 s )1 L # • eputy Jerk [19-CPS-01860/1505081/11106 10/22/19 Appeal of Official Interpretation of The Vineyards PUD INTP-2019PL0062 The Orchards Community Association, Inc. Appellant/Applicant: The Orchards Community Association, Inc. Appeal of: Official Interpretation INTP2019-PL-0062 Location of Requested Access: •Orchards only has 1 point of access •Piper’s/Groves have 2 points of access •Groves Road connects to Vanderbilt Beach RD •Old Groves Road connects to Airport Pulling RD •Gate blocking Orchards from access to commercial and Airport- Pulling RD LDC 1.06.01.D.6.c ▪The BZA can modify or reject the interpretation if:“such board finds that the determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence or that the official interpretation is contrary to the Growth Management Plan,the future land use map,the LDC or the official zoning atlas,or building code,whichever is applicable.” The BZA must reject the official interpretation if it finds no credible evidence to support the facts in the official interpretation ▪Fails to consider purpose and intent of Vineyards PUD ▪No rational connection to actual record of zoning approvals presented ▪Gives no weight to: ▪PUD language and PUD Master Plan ▪SDPs for Piper’s or Orchards ▪Approved subdivision plats for Piper’s or Orchards ▪Recorded and required easements ▪Any other supporting documentation ▪Acknowledges “interconnected system is provided for” but the final conclusion is: “there’s no restriction on placement of gates” –which is not what Orchards is disputing Official Interpretation Ordinance 85-15, as amended “The Vineyards PUD” Ordinance 85-15 Ordinance 86-63 Ordinance 87-44 Ordinance 90-78 Ordinance 91-75 Ordinance 95-62 ▪Vineyards PUD is governing regulatory document for Orchards,Piper’s Grove and North Groves ▪Purpose and intent of Vineyards PUD: to provide multiple access points to residents within Piper’s Grove,North Groves and the Orchards through Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport- Pulling Road and commercial shopping facilities Amendments to The Vineyards PUD The PUD Requires Interconnection and Multiple Access Points for all properties in the PUD ▪The Vineyards PUD is not devoid of access point commitments ▪The Vineyards PUD Master Plan requires that all communities west of Livingston Road are to have access to both Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road The Vineyards PUD Ord. 91-75, p. 46 “Access to the project shall be restricted to those access points shown on Exhibits A-1 and A-2,hereto,provided that the location of the accesses to commercial parcels shall be approved by the County Engineer.” The Vineyards PUD Exhibit A-1 (1991) The Vineyards PUD Exhibit A-2 (1991) Ordinance 95-62 Amendment ▪1995 amendment to PUD did involve a change to the Master PUD Plan ▪Requirement for interconnection and the multiple access points was not removed ▪BOCC minutes show no discussion about removing the requirement for interconnectivity and multiple access points The Vineyards PUD Ord. 95-62 “…Ordinance Number 85-15, as amended to replace the existing Vineyards PUD Master Plan Exhibit ‘A-2’ located west of I-75 with new PUD Master Plan Exhibit ‘A- 3’.” The Vineyards PUD Exhibit A-2 (1995) The Vineyards PUD Exhibit A-3 (1995) Development Approvals Clearly Show the Required Interconnection ▪Site Development Plans (SDPs)for both Piper’s Grove and Orchards are consistent with the PUD requirement for multiple access points ▪Piper’s Grove developer stipulated in planning meetings that the entrance points would provide The Orchards residents with “thru access to the commercial site”(Publix)and Airport Road Piper’s Grove SDP Pre-Application Meeting Notes “Access gates at entrance points proposed,will stipulate residents east of project in Vineyards will require thru [sic] access to commercial site.” Piper’s Grove Planning Services Division Transportation Memorandum States that the SDP for Piper’s Grove provides interconnection to Orchards parcel,which is “consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan.” The Orchards Report of Community Development Services (CDS) •August 7,1990 •Record advising the Planning Commission in The Orchards approval process that the project (i.e.The Orchards)is to have access from Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Road •“Access to [Orchards]is from Vanderbilt Beach Road,an existing two lane collector facility and Airport-Pulling Road an existing 4 lane arterial facility.” The Orchards Traffic Impact Analysis (1990) Traffic analysis assumed 10% of residential trips from Orchards/Piper’s kept internal to access on-site shopping and commercial Notes from Resolution 90-503, approving Orchards SMP-90-28 “Planner Milk indicated the main access is intended for Vanderbilt Beach Road with another point of access onto Airport-Pulling Road.” How did Collier County ensure that the PUD Developers met their Commitment for Interconnection? •County planning and zoning staff required Developers to create a proper easement which was directly incorporated into the approved subdivision plats for Piper’s Grove and North Groves. •Required easement is referenced on Old Groves Road on all pages of the plats •In a rare notation in the General Notes,the plats for Piper’s Grove expressly reference the Declaration of Easements. “General Notes” from plats for Piper’s Grove Phase One and Phase Two: •“Old Groves Road is subject to an easement in favor of Procacci Bros.Sales Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation,their successors and assigns,an owner of a contiguous tract consisting of approximately 84 acres to the east of Piper’s Grove for vehicular and pedestrian access and egress,pursuant to a Declaration of Restrictions recorded at O.R.Book 1898,Pages 2308-2318,of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida.” Conclusion on PUD: The Substantial Evidence Shows It Was Not Fully Interpreted •This is not a private matter merely because the Developers created an easement. •The Developers were required to provide the easement to ensure interconnection, which the Planning Services Division stated was consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan. •Official Interpretation states the installation of gates by Piper’s Grove is not a PUD violation.This is not the issue.The Orchards is not asking for public access through the PUD property.These are private roads,but all properties west of Livingston Road were supposed to have the two access points. •The violation is that Groves Residents Association refuses to provide Orchards with access through the gate.The violation would be resolved if Groves complied with the PUD,the SDPs and plats requiring interconnection and flow through access. There is a Second Violation of the LDC •Section 10.02.03.G.of the LDC requires review and approval by the County Manager for any proposed change or amendment to a previously approved SDP •10.03.01.G.1:“a substantial change…shall be defined as any change which substantially affects existing transportation circulation…” •Groves never obtained approval under its SDPs to block or remove the interconnection. •Notably,this approval and amendment to SDP’s would require consent from The Orchards •Burden should not be on Orchards to seek a zoning determination regarding the PUD.The burden should be on Groves to obtain proper approval to amend its SDPs before it unilaterally blocks the Airport-Pulling access point.We believe that would also require a PUD and plat amendment because of the requirement for access for the property to the east. Prior Code Case (2005): Code Enforcement correctly pursued this matter before •In March 2005,Code Enforcement with approval from the County Attorney’s Office filed a code complaint because of the blocked access. •In November 2005,the case was suddenly closed on the grounds that it was a “private matter.”Why? •Code enforcement and the County Attorney had the correct view of the violation and the PUD requirements.They recognized that the Developers of Piper’s Grove and The Orchards received development approvals on the condition that it provide the multiple access points. •Fortunately,the Board still has an opportunity to get this right by correcting the Official Interpretation and directing code enforcement to enforce the PUD and LDC. The County Attorney’s Substantive Review in the 2005 is consistent with The Orchards’ position There is a Precedent for the Board to Agree with The Orchards’ Request •We already discussed how code enforcement and the County Attorney already took enforcement action on this very case in 2005. •In 2008,Imperial Golf Estates HOA sued Milano HOA and Delasol HOA in a private lawsuit to establish a connection to Livingston Road.That lawsuit was based on private easements and applicable PUD’s.After that suit was filed,the County Attorney with support from Commissioner Halas,prosecuted a code enforcement action against Milano and Delasol on the grounds that interconnection was required by their respective PUD’s. •In that case,while there were some private property rights to resolve in that case,the Board and the County Attorney had no issue in enforcing the code and zoning approvals imposed in the development process when it came to interconnectivity in private developments. •Imperial’s back entrance now connects to Livingston Road,which resolved an important traffic and safety issue. The Official Interpretation is Contrary to Current County FLUE, Transportation and LDC Policies •Collier County encourages interconnectivity and internal access to reduce congestion and impact on collector and arterial roads. •FLUE Policy 7.3 provides:All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type.The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Traffic Element. •Transportation Policy 7.3 provides:The County shall require,wherever feasible,the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network.The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require interconnection of neighboring developments and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. The Official Interpretation is Contrary to Current County FLUE, Transportation and LDC Policies ▪Section 10.02.03 G.of the LDC provides:Any proposed change or amendment to a previously approved SDP shall be subject to review and approval by the County Manager or designee (through an amendment or insubstantial change application). •As previously stated,if access is not allowed,an SDP amendment should be required. •The Groves has unilaterally changed a previously approved site development plan,substantially affecting transportation circulation and interconnectivity to the Publix shopping center and Airport-Pulling Road,as contemplated in the Vineyards PUD and all supporting documentation. What can the Board do as the BZA? •Option 1:Disaffirm the Official Interpretation based on the compelling and substantial evidence showing that the PUD and all subsequent development approvals require the two access points for all properties west of Livingston Road. •Option 2:Disaffirm the Official Interpretation based on the compelling and substantial evidence and require Groves to provide the required access until Groves has obtained the approvals and amendments required by the LDC in order to change the original PUD,SDP and plat approvals. •Option 3:Disaffirm the Official Interpretation and based on the compelling and substantial evidence and require the County Manager or designee to provide a substantive explanation on the PUD language,PUD Master Plan and subsequently approved plats and SDP’s,explaining why the 84 acres to the east of Piper’s Grove is not entitled to the Airport Road connection under applicable code. Groves’ Response to Appeal ▪On October 18,2019,Groves’attorney circulated a lengthy “Response”to this appeal. ▪Groves’Response confuses the appeal issue by referencing “public”access through its private roads. ▪Orchards has not requested any kind of “public”access. ▪The only access rights at issue is Orchards’right to have access through Old Groves Road as required by the PUD and development approvals. ▪Groves argues the Board is not authorized to rely on easements,plats,site development plans or staff reports and notes leading up to those final approvals.That is not what the Collier County Administrative Code says.The Official Interpretation is rendered in light of the Growth Management Plan and LDC (which governs the PUD).A review of all pertinent records and reports is critical for an interpretation of the PUD to ensure that all development commitments and approvals have been met. Groves’ Response to Appeal ▪Groves argues that a decision in Orchards’favor would have “far reaching”adverse impacts on the rest of the Vineyards PUD and all PUDs for that matter.This is not true. ▪The narrow question at issue is whether Orchards is entitled to a second point of access at Airport- Pulling Road,and the PUD and development approvals are clear on that issue. ▪In fact,denying the appeal and upholding the Official Interpretation will encourage other communities and developers to block or disconnect the interconnections that are critical to traffic impact and the Growth Management Plan. ▪Groves argues that Orchards has submitted the wrong PUD Master Plan and that the correct plan shows that the Airport-Pulling Road access point is no longer shown.Again this is wrong. ▪The PUD Master Plan was amended in ordinance 95-62.However,it still has a clear arrow for access pointing directly at Old Groves Road at the Airport-Pulling Road intersection. ▪Also,the BOCC minutes for 95-62 show no discussion whatsoever about removing the access point or removing it for Orchards’use. Groves’ Response to Appeal ▪Groves argues that it is too late for Orchards’appeal because it failed to approve prior approvals pertaining to the PUD property. ▪There was no reason to appeal those prior approvals because none of them removed the interconnection requirement. ▪Groves claims that there are “numerous SDP and building permit approvals”issued over the years for Groves’roads and its gate.However,Groves fails to reference any specific approval for the gate or blocking of access,nor was it mentioned in the Official Interpretation. ▪If Groves had such a written and properly advertised public approval,that would be a critical document and would be the first document they would rely on. ▪It is not too late for Orchards to seek compliance with its PUD. ▪PUD’s are tracked annually by the PUD Monitoring office to ensure that all development commitments are met. ▪The PUD language itself references the multiple access points,and they are still shown on the applicable PUD master plan. Groves’ Response to Appeal ▪Groves also improperly relies on the statute of limitations. ▪Groves argues that The Orchards’appeal is time barred. ▪Section 95.11 ,Florida Statutes,applies to “civil actions or proceedings”,which of course does not apply to an administrative request for Official Interpretation and whether a current code violation should be corrected. ▪If this was a valid position,the County Attorney would have advised the Zoning staff before it responded to Orchards’request and it would have been reflected in the Official Interpretation. Christopher J. Thornton, Esq. Treiser & Collins, P.L. on behalf of Groves Residents Association, Inc. ADA-PL20190001155, (Orchards appeal of INTP-PL20190000062) Old Groves Road has been gated and private for more than 25 years. There is no evidence to overturn the staff interpretation. The staff interpretation in INTP-PL-2019-0000062 should be adopted by the BZA and the appeal filed by Orchards in ADA-PL-2019-0001155 should be rejected for the following reasons: •The staff’s official interpretation is correct and the Petitioner has not met its burden of overturning the official interpretation. •The Groves private road has been gated for more than 25 years •The scope of review in this matter is limited to interpretation of the LDC and the Vineyards PUD,and nothing in the LDC or PUD prohibits private roads or gates,or requires that residents of Orchards be permitted access over the private roads that are owned and maintained by Groves.All of the Petitioner’s arguments come from outside the LDC and PUD. •This is a private matter between neighborhoods involving easement rights over which BZA has no jurisdiction.Groves does not agree that any easements give Orchards any rights. •BZA should be cognizant of the potential applicability of this decision to the rest of Vineyards and other residential PUDs •Orchards has missed at least a dozen opportunities to challenge the various approvals for the gates including PUD and amendments,plats,and any SDPs and building permits and therefore the opportunity to challenge expired long ago Location Map PUD is 1,930.16 acres for 5,608 units Not just Groves and Orchards Groves access from Airport Gated since 1993 Filing Date Dec. 21, 1992 Deeded to Groves Filing Date Jan. 6, 1993 Deeded to Groves Groves access from Vanderbilt Gated since built Also gated by Orchards Filing date Jan. 28, 1994 Deeded to Orchards Filing date Sept 7, 1994 Deeded to Groves Petitioner’s Exhibit F from 1991-75 PUD has been deleted, and superseded by 1995-62. This Exhibit is false and misleading. The current version of the PUD master plan for Vineyards PUD west is from Ord. 95-62 in Groves Ex. 9. Does not show the road the Petitioner wants to use. Orchards does have potential access that they are not using Orchards plat Sheet 5 -access to Vanderbilt is not being used Orchards plat sheet 7 – access to Livingston is not being used •5.7.1985 Ord. 85-15 Vineyards PUD (1925.4 acres, 6,978 units) •5.7.1985 DRI Res.Vineyards DRI DO 85-2 •9.16.1986 Ord. 86-63 Amend Vineyards PUD •6.2.1987 Ord. 87-44 Amend Vineyards PUD •10.23.1990 Ord. 90-78 Amend Vineyards PUD •8.13.1991 Ord. 91-75 Amend Vineyards PUD (1930.16 acres, 5,608 units). •12.21.1992 PB 20 page 89 Plat -Tract A “The Old Groves Road” (Airport entrance) •1.6.1993 PB 20 page 97 Plat -Pipers Grove Phase One (35.96 acres) •1.28.1994 PB 22 page 55 Plat –Groves Road (Vanderbilt entrance) •3.22.1994 PB 22 page 76 Plat –The Orchards (83.6 acres) •9.7.1994 PB 23 page 71 Plat –Pipers Grove Phase Two (25.90 acres, •11.14.1995 Ord. 95-62 Amend Vineyards PUD (new master plan for west) •2.28.2006 DRI Res. 06-49 Vineyards DRI DO 06-01 (extend buildout) •Site Development Plans •Building Permits Too Late to Appeal Sec. 250-58. -Appeal from decision of administrative official. (a) Appeals to a board of zoning appeals or the governing body, as the case may be, may be taken by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board, or bureau of the governing body or bodies in the area affected by the administrative decision, determination or requirement made by the administrative official. Such appeals shall be taken within 30 days by filing with the administrative official a written notice specifying the grounds thereof. The administrative official shall forthwith transmit to the board all papers, documents, and maps constituting the record of the administrative action from which an appeal is taken. Section 95-11, Florida Statutes, imposes 5 year statute of limitations and 5 years for laches on an easement claim. •The 1990-1992 pre-application meeting notes and preliminary staff reports submitted by Petitioner were never incorporated into the final approvals and have been superseded by subsequent iterations of the project •Petitioner relies on private easements over which the county has no jurisdiction •The scope of this BZA appeal is limited to staff’s interpretation of the PUD Evidence GMP The 2017-2018 GMP excerpts submitted by Petitioner from the FLUE and Transportation Element should not be relied on to overturn existing PUD and Plat and building permit approvals for this 1985 PUD/DRI as all of those approvals were based on the GMP in effect at the time and were not appealed after approval more than 20 years ago. The staff interpretation in INTP-PL- 2019-0000062 should be adopted by the BZA and the appeal filed by Orchards in ADA-PL-2019-0001155 should be rejected Z M cD DJ B CD CO 8A 2 CD o �. co D Cl) c- CO Xi _ � = o m � O r° !� CD r � � r oWm o noom s 41 xi = p- 0 z �n m c( OO ____. 044 OO mz D pmz % n0 -imop � � �r mz cn .4-,.. m o z = c -� - D z m 0zz �� f% -n D - m H-I zm CO g � m m * Wo p c-) D -1 PSS CoC z = CD -1 c _I = C) -I G7_ 0 m X2 Cl) r- cnl DicDn v CL..., -v D oI � 'n X < > N a Ca = O T� -Im W mm - Hm00 r- oma m -0O � O 700 C m0mm c- C -I cnK xi O o O m Om O- C7 7Jz0 IP mop a Q O 00z o73 nl c � � _ � m n c m O Z m O o -Ti co _On cn-I > -1o --I r Z D , m D zoo V D z y c -+ o O 'D n m -1 > 00 P. m � z O omm PI Zy m c�i� k7 (� r N -Iv' D nz - t mo 73 o = r:n 7) D m m 2 m = Z < z Cl) o o, v -I m0 cn mO -i 0 = 0 0 DSD r m m Z � p r J. C- D Oz m - L) i � oc � -+ �' W r . _, _, ____ ---__ n ZD XI 73 CD IN ag Z g n 8A i- N 3 aza co -0 0 w73 fi to 0 cm C _ o 13) r D z c cc n G) z p r E!2 r _' 2 n < z O Wm m =+ = m c ' 1 - zIR m 0 o 51 D 2 - („5 -I 0 cO , l M r -° z 0 • `-moi m -i z o -I-I 73 -1 = G7w D zom m cw D - T -0 rn z (--2 O (A) 000 > Z7 r- W ...ma -I t s. -im > rn TIr n > C0 p � D o -I-I 07J -Ioo 0- c = = oc m = -I03 0- a- CIL M 7 Cn m 0 f CD n big O� x -n,.., Ooo /f N O CO = O D z ,,, •-i- r- „} r � i 70omZ CD o c-I cn K 71 coo �rt.� v m 71 -I C7 ymcosl 1:2v cn O z p7 m � z Coo > z �. -n n � E m � 0 0 O ZOpo -11 po � I n Cn o �-I Oci> o mz -0 o 0 ^ 1 D * m � 70c� � 3 0 r.-= z D -1om O S Cl) v- -I m � u) s % I > m --1 rn -IcnD ! `�) rcn > O � � - > o2J > zr �� m Cn o * p cn 0) o XI m Om m m - z < z Gn c0cn r M -1 C) m 0 0 m = in S� r Z n oz r *� xi go = m 9` c -I -< � m = = 0 % 70 mm mm -I G) r, z mz h 0 71 Z CDW � n 8A • 3 a CO U) `° CD 73 0 CC � . h CC 0. v C/) COc r-o 0 �= m R 0g co g,,., � -mi73 = m cci, -Zi =1 Koc) LSu z O mZ D OmZ ) 0 M cnO --I ZZ R3 m m -1 O G) 6 � "� c4i� m = Z � �` - m � 0m m G z 'T7 0 T En- Dz m 1 71 r0 co - r O M =+ mm m gooZ 0o Co -n Z m -< w zoC 1 , D CD —I o -i G _ C:). On m 0o2 m DD Q. xTo � «n cr CU tn T � T oho \t o CD p xix O mo n) P 3 . O c co r -< O O M Om p1 n X2o a 0 r (,) 0 O OG) Zo T m Z M D Dr.. 1 -I v -a T = -+ r„ s n O 73 co Z m O o -1 Oo Cn 0r0 1 I _ = o > o cn �- N.CI zoo V Cn rz , m08 O -0 >co m T D0 7 /�3 r ccn > Z3J A n T mmO m m mc � pDm0Z2 ►T oC ? N X - ? X mo o = z W-I < Cn onk m0 Cmo -i cn •r mm z El0I 73 T oz r moo )i OD '< Zmo0 r C0 —I ic� co -< m = 0 c(n Xi m -1—1 01 0 -< z = 0 > X) > 8A CD13 a 133 Et CO CD0 tn CD -<73 0 c CD CU W T ,� 23 = o m I-• cr. p/ . r CD D 55K r o_ m 0 0 - e 0 wn 5 Ki-Hx = a m vc, 1 = Kon Z min c�nm � 91 0 - nn0 0 CI zz Y • _ _ ..1_ / Ill Oz X G7 Z c ' 1 /1 r p m _ > �,/ �j D r- mp T G7 z m / O 0 o w m "< z fL m_ o0 o CO Z -nZ =° -<° W z 0 C 22w �� Q -;, CD = Oc m m0- V 1 sZ " = m w ,....,m > › Li v 1 --p CL y � � T < � fy Oro • 70m 70 8OFn- 6 ( " mm Or'—I 0 2m 3 OK x C m 0 5 2 0 � CD i -I cnK X/ oco = opn � p 0 - — I M z0 cnz p O 2 �. m P C D co z Or �.-■ -4 -13 = F4m v 0 0 0pp Z m0N —I O2 =I C7 o O 0 r_ o D 73 - cn m O K Z 0 =-1 > r"-, G /. D m D z _, 0 II// Ii r z > C Cn r- -Imac -0 ym _, Dom 7 /. 1 m m O p m rn l Jr' D mpo D xvnp ' CO pcn D mc C L m -8 = D OO ' n (0 ';r) l -v � n mIt Z m z CO m m y . m o -� I -? O ---1 o COo > . /� I— m m Z p P / D Dzroo . 530 > -< zmp „J f r c —1 -r o :ei1 _,, (-' -< m = c � C , TT z --I z 2 XI V' cD su n 8A -a a 2- CO Cis cn P. co CD -13O C 0- cc� r — CO Ill rO r CD > K r 0 W m O �N m CnZ ,_ o-TI0 v_, -i m Cr) X0 -------, Z n z cn cn m c 0 � z0 0 Zmz d rQ 0 O m � � m m m ( z (I) .9 m zO "" m xi = D _i m PTI o z z p -n I- ° PTI cn > m - Ooo w m � J rW .... -. r0 _J � m * Wo Z � � Z = -O s' = G7c mow 0- c = 0 m m > > O. o M cr) 0. Op .4 m =ID m v __-1 = xOM � m N co mm 73 -ImZ J 0 iii I- r- Owm -L 0 m - 0 3 -I cnM 73 WOc0 m OTp� , 7Jzo a 0 r m o O D 0 13 m O XW Ltj Z mZN We. or � 0co0o oK a, `v O n N D El .. M OK Z 0 =1 > 1 v opmp Zo r a � V\Co f/) r- -I Om S m PTI > 0 N n 1 7 m O o m m 9"...., N O D 7 3 gj 0 `- mpm0m o * oc55 m xj D mm m tcn m mk - /'� c) _ o 0 yaa r mm Z � pI- _L oz r mOo - r c < _cli m 2 c - m z ...,. —< 2 fit` XI DC7 .CD 2 n R a -< I N P. 2 CO -< om CD - 0 /= r2 c co c0 D m0 zo � \ -IDr° c m0 -1 C} CD r O M O � z O nm • _ 0 O ao -I �m --1 z _ \ 0m- o ,y D \ T m D 73 0 0 C-4 o00 D r co 0 _1 i m D m z (Q O -n Z 0 � � o -Z-1 z 70 C -1 0 D - = _ c -1 --1 co Q c m -� Q m coW m- p cD D o� p T 000 UU)) o bai W min O D0z3 M � rn '-� o � z �J CD —1 0 -0 Ozzm --k., li m . C7 N m CDi O r cno OzO > m � z 'S 00ExxOZ (• =. m mDC� ooo O � -n -4 --1 0 " cn o o _ =i0 n oc7 0 Oz � 0n2 •. CA M 0 P —ID —tom O W � � mcn m � m - = es DCn o7a > zD cn 0 m r MO = W M w W O xi m X co Z < z fn 0cn -1 m 0 W cn cn -I O '1 = 0 m = I- mm Z '3 > ^, moz r .� > oD -1m C r � m = = 0 c\N - G M mm C') m L. z c D rn� D xi 0 z _ � m 73 Zn 8A CD z o- `o 3 r' CO r co` D co CD W c � o 13) I D z c CO n G) z p — r m � m -0 Cr.Ioo = ^ CD n 55K < p o o a m oo m M p mz 0 nm vJ 0 cno O czo \ m -rn30-1 ccoM 2 Ow \ � 1 my oo m O_w ' P' D p rrl -I O oz op 0 W oo9D ))) 0 � '. OD 7Z ,CQ .17iCD -1 zo 070 _i -I0p 0_ 2 = 2 0 � rn = 0 � Q. mm CA m O o cD a O- -I op rn co U) 0 UM Co =Aw �7 O D p z t: = r� r � mX omD (D rn mT Kcnn z 0- 73x OzZN % - -a O cn X -I � o rt X o o op . O rn rn - ,O z � 8 m � z M 0 OD z �� D -1 -0C mn0No %, n Oor X Tco Z00c), Cn 2- o n o rn oo Dozm \ ')("-:\ D Fz cn 1- > --I o m i CO Cr) X •m co-1m Dm _-I --I cn D Dmx OD CD 1./ p � mr 13 o = v No xi ym rn m - Z < z Cl) c w C7 m � O � D 1 m 0z r 5� 1u xi p0 ..N. = p7 E -a ti -< � m � ;Z\,,,._ _-i rn n m " 1 cn C") rm z 2 m Vj D m 2 \^ CD 11) M n 8A -a a a GQ � `•° CD -‹ CD = -o O = ` 03 C CD CL = ,1 ) CO E D0 .2i w (M = 0 m DO �_ ? CD 0 r r O co m O I 3 Wm s � Tx m � � m � � o � � Z O mz 0 omz \ 0 O M O z 77 /13-10D D Zmm m 02z m D 0 mz m . `,_ xi O co r O M I m E W ry 0 Z ADn Z = -< ow E " CD —I GG) C 2Zw Q 'n m n cDn CD - D Op -n X < K N = a1 mnT -t -I---- m 3 -10 -0 O = Zp % 3 O 73 ,, C m0 � 1 0 co m o0 c7 7OZp `� rt 0 I— Co p O p 0 z m � z H0 O �5 mm cm . . -iC = Z \ n O (73 cD Z mho s 2 0C n> E coi, p — \ 0 * m 0 Zoo z D c \\,' I WN cmno � O CD .� D m -1 > 0 n Mm O c m m ' N p � D Xi CI)m � � 0 oz M p * 0 O G) m cji 7/ D m m � m = Z < Z cA p W = --I m D -0 O - \ C7 mm Z 19 jr r \jN` m oz r Koo xi p D -� m m W z0 co - � m 2 cc 5 x m z -A z 2 D XI zCD SD >0 8A N 91 2 CD -< om m a = c O Wm n P. m C w C < O 5 CD n n 0z -0 - = o m 0 , . CD r rl K r C 9, o D x K p 3 C) cZ n mz m m w -I _•1 cn z ••• `k % Z O 'zT' z D zm — - 0 0 c0 --� c r iz pN --. , m -1 zo i ml ((i) m = 9.) F., rt, 1 m oo x w (,, 0 z m m c G' D p -1C O 0o W OZO (� =am E > m Z -n Z0 m -1-- o CD -I 0 � _.1 -I CD �,� a c ist = c � � -i Co J �- g Cl. m x � cn m00 ,-> m n -io -n 000 •rn• 0 _ co = O >70 pz (A e�1k mm -. Kcn m"4 p � O zm _ O � 0CzUcn cGo 4, '�"' 2 00 0cmi) mo -tea r m Z C p O Z --IV. mn E 7J ; p n -I -02 m apo .. O oF_o_ Z-10 _ N —I 0 cn ci) 0-4''. N ..-_, % _ =Io D pzm CI � m 0 -o> -d FM D -iOm Cn f- -I /.1 - cn 1, IDm ...1z-1w > r cn > O � � . r M CO cn Z r �m o * p o c, x Dm Om mW E < z cn c cn IC --I m o cn cn --I r m m Z; D mz r pD "� = oo cc —I -1T R , -L m 2 m0 73 m mm: • - in 0 rn- m 0 D O 73 J _ . mz t. CD n 8A 3 (CI c `° a CD cn CD 1 -' c 0 - o CL co113v w co -0 m00 m r- O r�-r,.' — r n �, d mr wm omm 0� 3 a, m j Ko0 m � Z _ oc� — Z wO •o zcm cnm O mz _ mz ► O m � o —1 zzl rD . -0 O73Im m D o � --I cn 2 o , ._Y� T O z XJ m D .t �' D zmm m 02z -n rr0 m c) > 2 O oFiz - z; iz M =im M * o° N O C7 D =I W o o CO z -n Z m -< w -I 0 x _1 2 0_0 -1w 1zi = o C m m D D Q' -, � m x cn n cn -o CL es CO = O a =i m , W mop _1 m z nart r x m o cn p C m „ „ -< --1— m o mpmO mn mC <oo r V\ -IcnP3 p C O = O O 0 > o x _ m c O coo O oZ c�m PM LIWz ▪. . zO xW z mO ^' CD -1 OnVOH ) m O , z 0 m z • z * D � �z ..Drzm > C o O Coo r- -I m oBiz - :1. Imm CI) p ir�R � m D0t) C • mmO � rnm � ii O o0m p 04 'G r = p --CW 23 > o m om m ) = Z < z V p W D --1 m G) cn m o --1 C) = cDi 0 r m m z Eli Ci D m oz r moo o z D -< m T °° 73 c < --1 --1 n W -<< � m = Oc0, M _1 n z 2 0 D 73 R A > Q D z m a CO -< / $ P. 2 CD -0 0 r ƒ g_ U = co CL a mo � R 03 / , ƒ k - \ � / 2 r -I / g Z CD 2 0 w m M 1 c = m q › Z 0 2 (7) 0 CI $ z CI 2m N - -D : o \ o \ . r- r2 g k km 2 G--) c C 4 Zm m ?� Ono ® Z � 0 , 99 o - 0 / > - fEz ICC k 7J -I0 0- - � 2 OE m / a7 \ £ O ( 51: CL, -1 / - � CO> • k % � > xi "1-2-1 0 0 0 Cl) o Ca % $ qf > 3:\ cr) - - � � a £ $ m = q » 022m k £ 3 a � n / R —I @ < Xm � - E OO () @20 L) � � Oz = � o I— pR M0 / k { �. O � 03 Z0 / k i O gp _iq -nw Iv K3 Eo / % X 2 ? 1)... in, �. m O £ , ti mem / 3 0 k � CI > � c e2 D $ Om O cn � / XIm £ � = 11 I m -a rn23w m �. 71 > rn —4lg 71 D / > Z I- M \ � � @ � r M / k 0 f / r k> frm m kw \ � ( 0 rn / O m = r mm r 73 ƒ > 02 r � SN 73 0 › -< Em - / m = 113 \ m 0m 2 2 mz O > / g 02 = ? m2 n 8A 13 3 rt CO o E > Cl) 0) = n mo m f- o - A r o °0m o' 2 M cn � _� � Oc� > l ''' m ,Mcwm cZ �\Oz m4 Ocn� � z �oo 1 -i c�nm = -7) C) Y1 ti M zoo m 0zz /) - ► m D D m c7) > m `.. 7C O moo w rn -< z 2 r- co v � r 0 m m * W N o CO -I 0 C = Z w L, > =n ""1 m o o m 7 � CA Pnc°n F3 v C co m cn o =i m �' -H z m 1T � �� m 3 +i o p xm o mow `1 -J m C 2 w0 oco ,, tj =~ '1 0 m -n -I n 73zg 0 r � 0 O O __ o m mz ,IicoV v7. -n -n M - c n -1 -0c m = -1m . n O o1 _4 Wpo n Cn o r = 00 > 7 � con 0 m oz __ z 0mz D � z D cpo O j" fn r- -I m- o r 0^-0m m --m D D CD o > -v D D � z o r- cn0 70D m m omm 4 FA 10 • m o * 0 0 G) '� D mm m o m = z < z V) oQ, D . -, mn cn ro --, �V 0 = 0 o D D • r- mm z 19or- • . M z r roXo -� Z „ o OD oo E -1 o -< m 2 m - � X r 8A The Orchards Public Hearing on Piper's Cove Appeal Adamczyk Law Firm PLLC 9130 Galleria Court, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34109 (239)631-6199 8A '*ADAMCZYK LAW FIRM, PLLC REAL ESTATE.CONDO/HOA& BUSINESS LAW MARK E. ADAMCZYK, ESQ. MARK@ADAMCZYKLA W FIRM.COM May 3,2019 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RRR: VIA U.S. MAIL Board of Zoning Appeals 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Appeal of Official Interpretation of The Vineyards PUD o/b/o The Orchards Community Association,Inc.,INTP-2019-PL-0062,published April 5,2019(the"Official Interpretation") Dear Board of Zoning Appeals: This Firm represents The Orchards Community Association, Inc. ("The Orchards"),who by the filing of this Appeal,timely appeal the above-referenced Official Interpretation to the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County and request a reconsideration of the Officiation Interpretation of PUD Ordinance 85-15,as amended("The Vineyards PUD"). This Appeal is submitted pursuant to section 8.10.00 and subsection 1.06.01 D of the Collier County Land Development Code ("LDC"). The right to supplement this response with additional parties is specifically reserved. The parties, who qualify either or both as an "affected property owner" and/or as an "aggrieved or affected party"are the following: See List of Affected Property Owners and/or Aggrieved or Affected Parties attached hereto as Exhibit"A" Enclosed please find: 1. The Appeal filing fee of$1,000 and legal advertising fee of$1,500 2. The form for this Appeal 3. The submittal and a flash drive of the attached submittal, including the legal basis for the Appeal and all supporting materials and exhibits thereto for the review and consideration by the Board of Zoning Appeals as part of the Appeal. No rights, concerns, arguments, positions or objections of the party appealing the Official Interpretation are waived by anything stated herein or omitted herefrom. Moreover, the right to make, present, supplement and submit additional arguments and materials before the Board of Zoning Appeals as to the Appeal is specifically and expressly reserved. L 8A As noted in the attached submittal, this filing and submittal of legal argument, supporting documentation and materials,which are incorporated herein as part of the Appeal,is and are being made and provided while specifically reserving the right to further amend, modify or supplement this filing and Appeal with additional arguments and materials. In the event any additional forms or materials are required, other than the ones enclosed herein to be submitted with the Appeal, please advise immediately, and I will promptly provide same. I respectfully request that the Official Interpretation of Michael Bosi be reversed, and the Board of Zoning Appeals finds that the Vineyards PUD, along with the planning approvals for Groves Resident's Association, Inc. ("The Groves") and The Orchards require multiple access points at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road,and therefore,The Grove must provide access to The Orchards through Old Groves Road. I thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, for;Mar lc E. Adam. Esq. For the Firm Enclosures Cc(with enclosures): Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Esq. Michael Bosi,AICP, Zoning Director 8A 0 , 0 O O 0 0 J ,a aZ N toN Q F Q a p W Z O y z 0 o O 0 O i - t H Q 0 O m O Q U') rn Y 4 -a U • v m i _,� N w _V. z a? 0 At .5 U CC O a to 0 W JD 0 m E rn - O � U. �O _./' lit . N N W O H I 0 o 0 > I- U WZ a: o • LL Z )111111 0E Fc )1111111•4, W Qj ci to x v w O j o 2 Ili 0N I-111 es- C @0 COcr ca 15 o 0 m = O0 O N11:11) C a • N O . - 0 N w •o N o U N LL N U 8 � — cN p ti cc > a)c N O E Q W N a (0 = 0 7 O Q o .63 C13 m C • O a)(13 � CO > 0 c5 o N2O ii ZccaO f° 0 o • Q >,N DW O - n 0 (nu) 8 ry a w Q) a Z •— n m oh Q q •C C _ 0 O co Q 0 y J_ ' W o 3 E ) to U U J 0 E. ,n U N O � � O � � N � is 7a°' d b- 0 = LLi HH U U � OI- 0UvZ Ute" �o CO= 8 • CD O • M U3 W I W O U -a ° CD to ~ Oc `m L0 _ M > E n I- UrnZ d 0O y "F I—`c a_ 8A Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 APPEAL OF OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION LDC subsection 1.06.01 D &Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch. 3 A. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Owner: The Orchards Community Association, Inc. Address: 9150 Galleria Court, Ste 201 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone: 239-631-6199 Cell: N/A Fax: N/A E-Mail Address: GIenF@sandcastlecm.com Applicant/Agent: Mark E. Adamczyk, Esq. Firm: Adamczyk Law Firm, PLLC Address: 9130 Galleria Court, #201 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone: 239-631-6199 Cell: N/A Fax: N/A E-Mail Address: mark@adamczyklawfirm.com DETAIL OF REQUEST Interpretation No. AR-INTP-2019-PL-0062 (Please reference the interpretation number that is being appealed) Attach a narrative describing the request,the legal basis for the appeal,the relief sought, including any pertinent information, exhibits,and other backup information in support of the appeal. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS See Chapter 3 A. of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements.The following items are to be submitted with the completed application packet: ✓ Completed application (download current form from County website) I Completed narrative • Electronic copy of all documents, please advise that the Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format.-rS%i'1T VsU r;/'riuil t :A� rk G .SIY,(f1 u�(,p//iereo,(i'I ii.( v FEE REQUIREMENTS: F1 drive GSI) (KUVlCkC . Ni-Vic acl.6051eci /cizat VI/ • Appeal of Official Interpretation Fee: $1,000.00 • Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$1,500.00 10/18/2013 Page 2 of 2 8A APPEAL SUBMITTAL IN SUPPORT OF THE APPEAL AND REVERSAL BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION FOR THE VINEYARDS PUD AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS THROUGH OLD GROVES ROAD Official Interpretation of The Vineyards PUD o/b/o The Orchards Community Association, Inc., INTP-2019-PL-0062,published April 5, 2019 I. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARY MATTERS This Appeal, filing and submittal of various argument, documents, supplements, exhibits and materials are incorporated herein and made a part of this Appeal. The purpose of this Appeal is to appeal the Official Interpretation INTP-2019-PL-0062, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and to request reversal of the interpretation that the Vineyards PUD,along with the planning approvals for The Groves and The Orchards do not provide a commitment of requirement for access points at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road. This Appeal and above-referenced request for reversal is being made and provided while reserving the right to further amend, modify or supplement this filing and Appeal with additional arguments and materials. The road for which The Orchards is requesting a County determination and interpretation requiring access shall be referred to as Old Groves Road. As noted in the Appeal form and submittal cover letter, this Appeal is being filed by the undersigned counsel on behalf of The Orchards Community Association, Inc., affected property owners, affected parties and/or aggrieved or affected parties are set forth in the List of Affected Property Owners and/or Aggrieved or Affected Parties attached hereto as Exhibit"A." As set forth in more detail below, there are a number of reasons why the Board of Zoning Appeals should reverse and set aside the Official Interpretation rendered by the Planning and Zoning Department. II. THE PARTIES/APPELLANTS/APPLICANTS The Party/Appellant/Applicant to this Appeal is The Orchards Community Association, Inc. ("The Orchards"), a Florida not for profit corporation which is the homeowners' association for The Orchards, with its principal address at 9150 Galleria Court, Suite 201, Naples, Florida 34109. See attached Exhibit"C." III. LOCATION OF REQUESTED ACCESS The Orchards residents only have one point of access for their community. That access point is Groves Road, which connects to Vanderbilt Beach Road (see Exhibit "D" attached hereto). Piper's Grove Condominium Association, Inc. ("Piper's Grove") and North Groves Condominium Association, Inc. ("North Groves") have multiple points of access. Specifically, they can access Vanderbilt Beach Road at the shared entrance with The Orchards, and also at Airport-Pulling Road through Old Groves Road (see Exhibit "E" attached hereto). Notably, a Page 1 of 6 8A gate was constructed at the entrance of Old Groves Road,blocking residents of The Orchards from accessing Airport-Pulling Road or the commercial shopping facility immediately west of the residential development. The Groves Resident's Association, Inc. ("The Groves") is the entity that owns and maintains Old Groves Road and the aforementioned gate. It is our belief that the PUD Ordinance 85-15, as amended("The Vineyards PUD"), along with subdivision plats and site development plans for The Orchards, require that access through Old Groves road be provided to residents of The Orchards so that they may enjoy the same access as residents of Piper's Grove and North Groves. IV. ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF GRANTING THIS APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION The Official Interpretation fails to consider the purpose and intent of the Vineyards PUD, which was to provide multiple access points to residents within The Orchards, Piper's Grove and North Groves through Vanderbilt Drive and Airport-Pulling Road and interconnectivity to the on- site commercial shopping facilities. Specifically, the Official Interpretation neglects or give any weight to the site development plans for Piper's Grove and The Orchards,the approved subdivision plats for both Piper's Grove and North Groves, the recorded easements and other supporting documentation pertaining to the planning approvals for the Vineyards PUD, which provide clear evidence of the intended interconnectivity and access to Airport-Pulling Road. The Vineyards PUD is Not Devoid of Access Point Commitments As discussed in more detail below, the supporting documentation provides clear evidence that the Vineyards PUD contemplates and requires access point commitments and interconnectivity to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling for each development tract, including The Orchards, within the PUD. The following documents are evidence of the purpose and intent of the Vineyards PUD: (1) Site Development Plans for Piper's Grove; (2) Site Development Master Plans for The Orchards (formerly Stoneybrook Estates); (3) Plat for Piper's Grove, approved by the County; (4) Plat for North Groves, approved by the County; and (5) Declaration of Easements, by and between Procacci Bros. Sales Corporation ("Procacci") and The Groves. Vineyards PUD The Vineyards PUD is the governing regulatory document for the Orchards,Piper's Grove and North Groves. The original Vineyards PUD is Ordinance 85-15, as subsequently amended in Ordinance 91-75 and Ordinance 95-62. Exhibits A-1 and A-2 from Ordinance 91-75 clearly show that all communities west of Livingston Road are supposed to have access to both Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road,which is attached hereto as Exhibit"F." Furthermore,the amendment to Ordinance 95-62 only involved a change to the Master Plan,but it still required the interconnection and access to both Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling Road and is attached hereto as Exhibit"G." Notably, the BOCC minutes for the approval of Ordinance 91- Page 2 of 6 8A 75 and Ordinance 95-62 show no discussion about removing the requirement for interconnectivity and multiple access points. The BOCC minutes are attached hereto as collective Exhibits "G" and"H." As stated above, the Master Plans in the original and amended iterations Vineyards PUD ordinances all provide for an interconnected street system. This fact is acknowledged and accepted in the Official Interpretation; however, the Official Interpretation goes on to state: ...an interconnected system is provided for,but there is no provision that permits or restricts the placement of gates within the internal PUD. This lack of information designating the location of gates is common to most PUDs as the internal streets are private and maintained by appropriate homeowners' associations. See Exhibit "B", paragraph 3. The above analysis implies The Orchards is disputing the placement of gates within the Master Plan and Vineyards PUD,but the actual issue and argument raised is that because the PUDs and Master Plans all clearly require access to Vanderbilt Beach Drive and Airport-Pulling as a condition of the approvals, the Groves must provide The Orchards with access to Old Groves Road. To be clear, The Orchards is not requesting that The Groves remove the gate at Old Groves Road; it is requesting access to Old Groves Road pursuant to the interconnected street system approved in the Master Plan and Vineyards PUD. Piper's Grove Site Development Plan In addition,the Site Development Plan Pre-Application Meeting Notes dated May 27, 1992 for review of the Piper's Grove Site Development Plan expressly states the developer "will stipulate [The Orchards] residents east of project in Vineyards will require thru [sic] access to commercial site." A copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes is attached hereto as Exhibit"I." As provided in the Vineyards PUD, the project to the east of Piper's Grove is The Orchards. The commercial site referenced in the pre-application meeting notes is the Publix shopping center at the corner of Airport-Pulling and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Nearly a month after the pre-application meeting, the Planning Services Division issued a Memorandum addressing the transportation planning and interconnectivity in Piper's Grove. The Memorandum states, in pertinent part, "the subdivision site plan provides an interconnection to the adjacent tract to the east. This is consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan." A copy of the Memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit"J." The Orchards Site Development Master Plan With regard to the Orchards Site Development Master Plan (formerly Stoneybrook Estates),the Memorandum to the Planning Commission from Community Development Services dated August 7, 1990 provides, "[a]ccess to the proposed subdivision is from Vanderbilt Beach Road, and existing two lane collector facility and Airport-Pulling Road an existing 4 lane arterial facility." A copy of the Memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit"K." The Memorandum also included a traffic analysis,wherein an assumed ten percent(10%)of the residential trips would be Page 3 of 6 8A kept internal when accessing the on-site shopping. This analysis, of course, presumed that The Orchards would have access to Old Groves Road as provided in The Orchards Site Development Master Plan. Additionally, the notes approving Resolution 90-503, which approved The Orchards Site Development Master Plan(SMP-90-28),indicate that Planner Milk stated main access"is intended for Vanderbilt Beach Road and another point of access onto Airport-Pulling Road." A copy of Resolution 90-503 is attached as Exhibit"L." Approved Subdivision Plats The Official Interpretation also points out that it is common for most PUDs to lack information designating the location of gates. While this correct, it is also important to note that most plats lack any reference to recorded declaration of easements. Incredibly,the plats for Piper's Grove and North Groves expressly reference the Declaration of Easements on the first pages of the plats for Piper's Grove Phase One and Phase Two. Under the"General Notes,"the plats state: Old Groves Road is subject to an easement in favor of Procacci Bros. Sales Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation,their successors and assigns, an owner of a contiguous tract consisting of approximately 84 acres to the east of Piper's Grove for vehicular and pedestrian access and egress,pursuant to a Declaration of Restrictions recorded at O.R. Book 1898, Pages 2308-2318, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Moreover, an ingress/egress easement is referenced on Old Groves Road on all pages of the plats, which is clearly a reference to the Declaration of Easements. The pertinent pages from the plats are attached as Exhibit"M." The Orchards is the community developed on the 84 acres to the east of Piper's Grove, and the plats provide further evidence to support the interpretation that the Vineyards PUD requires access point commitments and interconnectivity to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport-Pulling for each development tract within the PUD. Specifically, that Groves is required to provide access to Airport-Pulling Road through Old Groves Road pursuant to the approved subdivision plats. Declaration of Easements The Declaration of Easements by and between Procacci Bros. Sales Corporation ("Procacci") and The Groves, was recorded December 29, 1993 at O.R. Book 1898, Page 2308, Collier County, Florida Public Records (the "Easement"). A copy of the Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit"N." This Easement was created and recorded precisely when phases one and two of Piper's Grove were being platted and developed. Procacci Bros. (hereafter"Procacci") was the owner of Tracts A, C and D as shown on the conceptual site plan attached to the Easement. Tract D is The Orchards. The Groves developer owned Tract B(now Piper's Grove, Phase One),and had an option to acquire Tract C(now Piper's Grove, Phase Two). Tract A is the commercial parcel where the Publix shopping center was Page 4 of 6 8A developed. The Easement shows that Procacci granted access to Vanderbilt Beach Road in favor of Tracts B, C & D, via "Groves Road", which again now serves as the only entrance to The Orchards from Vanderbilt Beach Road. In turn, Groves granted access to Airport-Pulling Road through"Old Groves Road" in favor of Tracts B, C and D for passenger vehicle traffic. As a whole,it is clear that the main purpose of the Easement was to ensure that both Piper's Grove and The Orchards had multiple access points at Vanderbilt Beach and Airport-Pulling, which is consistent with the PUD and site development plans. Conclusion In sum, Collier County encourages interconnectivity and internal access to reduce the congestion and impact on collector and arterial roads,while minimizing the need for traffic signals. In fact, Policy 7.3 of the Future Land Use Element as of Ordinance No. 2018-48, adopted September 25, 2018 provides: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Traffic Element. A copy of FLUE Policy 7.3 is attached hereto as Exhibit"0." Objective 9 of the Transportation Element as of Ordinance No. 2017-25, adopted June 13, 2017 further provides: The County shall require, wherever feasible,the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. A copy of Transportation Policy 7.3 is attached hereto as Exhibit"P." Lastly, to the extent that The Orchards is not allowed access to Old Groves Road, as contemplated and expressly provided in the approved Site Development Plan for Piper's Grove and the approved Site Development Master Plan for The Orchards, an amendment should be required pursuant to Section 10.02.03 G.of the LDC. By refusing to allow The Orchards to access Old Groves Road, The Groves has unilaterally changed a previously approved site development plan,substantially affecting transportation circulation and interconnectivity to the Publix shopping center as contemplated in the Vineyards PUD and all supporting documentation. Based on the foregoing, we believe that the Vineyards PUD and the supporting documentation discussed herein, clearly require multiple access points at Vanderbilt Beach Road Page 5 of 6 8A and Airport-Pulling Road. Groves currently enjoys the required access, but Groves has blocked the required interconnection and second access point for The Orchards. The Orchards requests an interpretation consistent with the above analysis and that this matter be referred to Code Enforcement and the County Attorney's Office for enforcement if Groves continues to refuse access. Page 6 of 6 8A t, EXHIBIT AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR 7i AGGRIEVED OR AFFECTED PARTIES R The Orchards HOA/COA Property Owners List Parcel Owner Street Full Lot ID Name Number Street Unit 64702000108 ORCHARDS CMMTY ASSOC INC,THE _ _ 1 64702000205 ORCHARDS CMMTY ASSOC INC,THE 1 64702000302 ORCHARDS CMMTY ASSOC INC,THE 1 64702000409 ORCHARDS CMMTY ASSOC INC,THE _ 1 64702000506 ORCHARDS CMMTY ASSOC INC,THE 1 64702002504 ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSN INC 7718 GROVES RD 1 64702002520 ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSN INC 3 64702002533 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 7726 GARDNER DR 4 64702002601 ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSN INC 7857 GARDNER DR 1 64702002656 ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSN INC 1 64702002708 ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSN INC 7768 GROVES RD 1 64702002724 BUCKLEY,BARTRAM E=&SANDRA S 7755 GROVES RD 1 64702002740 BARTOVSKY,JIRI 7751 CITRUS HILL LN 2 64702002766 COLLINS,JOYCE D 7747 CITRUS HILL LN 3 64702002782 PIZZO,SALVATORE=&JOSEPHINE 7743 CITRUS HILL LN 4 64702002805 LAUCK,ROBERT B=&HELI 7739 CITRUS HILL LN 5 64702002821 PURDY JR,WILBUR=&MARILYN J 7735 CITRUS HILL LN 6 64702002847 BREMER,AUGUST H=&FELIXA R 7727 CITRUS HILL LN 7 64702002863 GRIFFITH JR,CHARLES S 7713 CITRUS HILL LN 8 64702002889 OLSON,ERIC STEVEN 7709 CITRUS HILL LN 9 64702002902 MYERS,ROBERT R=&MONIKA 7705 CITRUS HILL LN 10 64702002928 LABADIE,KENT A 7701 CITRUS HILL LN 11 64702002944 DILLINGHAM,DAVID M=&JANICE L 7697 CITRUS HILL LN 12 64702002960 ROOT,MARTIN J=&DIANE L 7693 CITRUS HILL LN 13 64702002986 SCHIPPER,MATTHEW A 7689 CITRUS HILL LN 14 64702003008 PEACOCK,CHRISTINE 7685 CITRUS HILL LN 15 64702003024 MUM III,JOSEPH P=&JAMIE C 7681 _ CITRUS HILL LN 16 64702003040 BUDDENHAGEN,JONATHAN P 7677 CITRUS HILL LN 17 64702003066 MAGIERA REV TRUST 7673 CITRUS HILL LN 18 64702003082 _BHANGIA,OMAR 7669 CITRUS HILL LN 19 64702003105 STROLLE,CAROLYN A=&DAVID P 7665 CITRUS HILL LN 20 64702003121 MOREY,JOHN K=&MARY B 7661 CITRUS HILL LN 21 64702003147_ FRASHER,SCOTT D=&SHEILA D 7657 CITRUS HILL LN 22 _64702003163 NIX,JAMES COURTNEY 7653 CITRUS HILL LN 23 64702003189 SMITH,GLORIA R 7649 CITRUS HILL LN 24 64702003202 KAY E MARK TRUST 7645 CITRUS HILL LN 25 64702003228 FURBEE,MARY M 7641 CITRUS HILL LN 26 64702003244 SCHALLERT,JOHN B C=&KIMBERLY 7637 CITRUS HILL LN 27 LI 64702003260 GRAZIANO,ELIZABETH 7633 CITRUS HILL LN 28 64702003286 NORMAN C&BETTY A BAUER TRUST 7629 CITRUS HILL LN 29 8A 64702003309 ZARENO LIMITED PTNRSHP 7625 CITRUS HILL LN 30 64702003325 ERIC R BENSON TRUST 7621 CITRUS HILL LN 31 _64702003341 OFNER,ROSANA T 7617 CITRUS HILL LN 32 64702003367 PETTOROSSI,RICHARD 7613 CITRUS HILL LN 33 64702003383 MANSELL,ALAN V=&DENISE R 7609 CITRUS HILL LN 34 64702003406 BRIENEN,RORY D=&LISA A _ 7605 CITRUS HILL LN 35 64702003422 BAKER,MOLLEEN 7601 CITRUS HILL LN 36 64702003448 PURCELL,THOMAS J=&ADRIANA 7599 CITRUS HILL LN 37 _64702003464 MIRANDA,SEAN=&JENNIFER 7593 CITRUS HILL LN 38 64702003480 RAFFALDINI,MIDDY LYNN 7589 CITRUS HILL LN 39 _64702003503 HIMEL,JASON J=&SHONDELLE H 7585 CITRUS HILL LN 40 64702003529 BARBARINO REV TRUST 7581 CITRUS HILL LN 41 64702003545 JOYCE,MICHAEL D=&VALERIE A 7577 CITRUS HILL LN 42 64702003561 GAZDA,MICHAEL J=&PATRICIA 7573 CITRUS HILL LN 43 64702003587 COOPER,JACK M=&DEBORAH D 7569 CITRUS HILL LN 44 64702003600 DAVID J ORDWAY DEC OF TRUST 7565 CITRUS HILL LN 45 64702003626 HEINRICH,JEFFREY SCOTT 7561 CITRUS HILL LN 46 64702003642 CONROY,DOUGLAS=&HELEN _ 7557 CITRUS HILL LN 47 64702003668 KRIVICKA,JOZEF=&FRANTISKA 7553 CITRUS HILL LN 48 64702003684_ FLAGG,DIANE B 7549 CITRUS HILL LN 49 64702003707 RECKLEIN,ROBERT J=&CURTISS B 7545 CITRUS HILL LN 50 64702003723 MARSHALL,DAVID A=&PREMA S 7541 CITRUS HILL LN 51 64702003749_ STRIEGEL,JOSEPH L 7537 CITRUS HILL LN 52 64702003765 MARY J CHERUBINI REV TRUST7533 CITRUS HILL LN 53 64702003781 FEDER,NORMAN E=&VIVIAN 7529 CITRUS HILL LN 54 64702003804 CANNAN,FRANCES MARIE 7525 CITRUS HILL LN 55 64702003820 MILLER,ERIC S=&KATHRYN E 7521 CITRUS HILL LN 56 64702003846 ROZSAS JR,LASZLO=&ANN MARIE 7517 CITRUS HILL LN 57 64702003862 MICHAELIS SR,EDWARD J 7513 CITRUS HILL LN 58 _64702003888 TROIANO,CHRISTOPHER D=&RUBY 7509 CITRUS HILL LN 59 64702003901 SUTHERLAND,MICHAEL D 7505 CITRUS HILL LN 60 64702003927 DIVER,BRIAN R 7746 CITRUS HILL LN 61 64702003943 LEEDY,JEFFREY P=&HEATHER A 7740 , CITRUS HILL LN 62 64702003969 PERRY,SUSAN T 7736 CITRUS HILL LN 63 64702003985 BOMBARD,CINZIA 7732 CITRUS HILL LN 64 64702004007 MARTIN HORNECK TRUST 7728 CITRUS HILL LN 65 64702004023 ST HENRY,RICHARD S 7724 CITRUS HILL LN 66 64702004049 AHMAD,NAJEH S=&VICKY R 7720 CITRUS HILL LN 67 64702004065 JONES,DEAN C=&JUDITH A 7716 CITRUS HILL LN 68 64702004081 ELLIS,JOHNETTE 7712 CITRUS HILL LN 69 64702004104 STOCKDALE,RHIANNON 7708 CITRUS HILL LN 70 64702004120 HACKETT,NANCY A 7704 CITRUS HILL LN 71 64702004146 DE ANDRES,DAMIAN=&CAROL D 7700 _ CITRUS HILL LN 72 64702004162 GASTEIGER,LISA C=&REX L 7680 _ CITRUS HILL LN 73 64702004188 KIKKERT,MICHAEL JAY=&CAROL J 7676 CITRUS HILL LN 74 L 64702004201 PAPANGELOU,CHRISTOPHER G 7672 CITRUS HILL LN 75 64702004227 ODETTE MARTUCIER LIVING TRUST 7668 CITRUS HILL LN 76 8A 64702004243 CLEELAND,BYRON T=&KATHLEEN T 7664 CITRUS HILL LN 77 64702004269 RUCI,NIKOLLA=&ELONA 7644 CITRUS HILL LN 78 ^64702004285 RICHMOND,DONALD H=&BERNICE F 7640 CITRUS HILL LN 79 64702004308 GOLDENBERG,ROSE H=&PERRY B 7636 CITRUS HILL LN 80 64702004324 BRADLEE,SCHYLER ANN 7632 CITRUS HILL LN 81 64702004340 RIGGIO,JOHN J=&RITA J 7626 CITRUS HILL LN 82 64702004366 ROSSET,PHILIPPE 7622 CITRUS HILL LN 83 64702004382 LIVINGSTONE,BRENDA F 7618 CITRUS HILL LN 84 64702004405 SCOTT FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 7614 CITRUS HILL LN 85 64702004421 HABERKERN III,JOSEPH W 7610 CITRUS HILL LN 86 64702004447 TAMBURELLO,ANTONIO=&MARIA 7606 CITRUS HILL LN 87 64702004463 9 MILES LLC 7602 CITRUS HILL LN 88 64702004489 GUENARD,GARY S=&PATRICIA J 2511 GROVE ISLE CT 89 64702004502 AVLAS,ANDREI 2519 GROVE ISLE CT 90 64702004528 MACKAY,KIMBERLEI K 2527 GROVE ISLE CT 91 64702004544 DIMODICA,TAMI L 2520 GROVE ISLE CT 92 64702004560 BAILEY,JEFF A=&SARAH 2512 GROVE ISLE CT 93 64702004586 HERNANDEZ JR,EFRAIN 7594 CITRUS HILL LN 94 64702004609 FELDON,MICHAEL A=&KATHLEEN 7590 CITRUS HILL LN 95 64702004625 CAVANAUGH,STEPHEN A 7586 CITRUS HILL LN 96 64702004641 GONZALES,JORGE L=&MELISSA M 7582 CITRUS HILL LN 97 64702004667 DUCKMAN,STEWART R 7578 CITRUS HILL LN 98 64702004683 GARNER,ELAINE J 7574 _ CITRUS HILL LN 99 64702004706 WAGNER,DONALD C 2621 WHITE CEDAR LN 100 64702004722 GOOTKIN,PAUL L=&JODI E 2635 WHITE CEDAR LN 101 64702004748 MC GOWAN,JOHN 0=&PAIGE A 2643 WHITE CEDAR LN 102 64702004764 ZAWISTOWSKI,CHRISTOPHER D 2655 WHITE CEDAR LN 103 64702004780 SWARTS,TY CARTON=&EMILY 2663 _ WHITE CEDAR LN 104 64702004803 MCLAUGHLIN HEGGS,KATHLEEN SUE _ 2671 WHITE CEDAR LN 105 64702004829 RAPACZ.DANIEL C=&MARGARET L 2679 WHITE CEDAR LN 106 64702004845 WELLS JR,GARRETH=&BETTY M 2691 WHITE CEDAR LN 107 64702004861 ANDERSON,KIRT E 7729 GROVES RD 108 64702004887 JACOBS,HARLAND IRA 7733 GROVES RD 109 64702004900 BILSON,RICHARD A=&JOAN M E 7737 GROVES RD 110 64702004926 FISHER,MARY LOU 7741 GROVES RD 111 64702004942 DBU LLC 7745 GROVES RD 112 64702004968 GERSHON,TERESA N 2688 WHITE CEDAR LN 113 64702004984 CHAPPELL,LISA A 2676 WHITE CEDAR LN 114 64702005006 SAKAMOTO,WAYNE SUSUMU 2664 WHITE CEDAR LN 115 64702005022 ECITYAN,SERGE 2652 WHITE CEDAR LN 116 64702005048 ROTHMAN,BRADLEY=&VICTORIA 2640 WHITE CEDAR LN 117 64702005064 FELIX,MICHELLE P=&DIOGO M 2628 WHITE CEDAR LN 118 64702005080 MILLER,JASON C=&TANYA 2616 WHITE CEDAR LN 119 _64702005103 HOBDEN,ALISON B 7566 CITRUS HILL LN 120 64702005129 ZHANG,XU 7562 CITRUS HILL LN 121 Lil 64702005145 CASOLARO,JOANNE=&VINCENT 7558 CITRUS HILL LN 122 64702005161 GOES,DAVID=&LISA J 7554 _ CITRUS HILL LN 123 8A 64702005187 BITTNER,KEVIN V=&ERIN R 7550 CITRUS HILL LN 124 64702005200 RUTH W LEPIDO DEC TRUST 7546 CITRUS HILL LN 125 64702005226 LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUS 7542 CITRUS HILL LN 126 64702005242 MAVEA LLC 7538 CITRUS HILL LN 127 64702005268 WESTPHAL,ERIC D=&HEATHER L 7534 CITRUS HILL LN 128 64702005284 KUNKLE JR,WESLIE E 7530 CITRUS HILL LN 129 64702005307 ESPOSITO,MICHAEL P=&MARY M 7520 CITRUS HILL LN 130 64702005323 JILL C KENNY TRUST 7663 GROVES RD 131 64702005349 HERRIDGE,ADAM GERALD 7667 GROVES RD 132 64702005365 MULLIN,WAYNE R=&CATHY A 7671 GROVES RD 133 _64702005381 RICHARD K HUBER&PAMELA J 7675 GROVES RD 134 64702005404 PLOCHARCZYK,JOHN MICHAEL 7679 GROVES RD 135 _64702005420 LEPORE,DEBRA A 7683 GROVES RD 136 64702005446 KENNY,BARBARA A 7687 GROVES RI) 137 64702005462 GENTILE,ROBERT=&ROBIN 7691 GROVES RD 138 64702005488 KUPERMAN,ENID 7695 GROVES RD 139 64702005501 PASCENTE,ROBERT A=&MARIE J 7699 GROVES RD 140 64702005527 O'NEILL,JOHN J=&SUSAN W 7703 GROVES RD 141 64702005543 PARKS,HARRY J=&DAWN A 7707 GROVES RD 142 64702005569 CUTTITTA,JOHN R 7711 GROVES RD 143 64702005585 RUSTICE,FABIO R=&DANIELA M 7715 GROVES RD 144 64702005608 MARY ANN BISCARDI REV LIV TRUS 7858 GARDNER DR 145 64702005624 KAMIN,KATHY E 7864 GARDNER DR 146 _64702005640 COLUMBO,JOSEPH=&JOANNE M 7868 GARDNER DR 147 _64702005666 DENTON,PATRICIA 7872 GARDNER DR 148 _64702005682 BRETZ,DENNIS 7876 GARDNER DR 149 64702005705 NORTON FAMILY TRUST 7880 , GARDNER DR 150 64702005721 DUNKLE,JEFFREY T=&KIMBERLY 7884 GARDNER DR 151 64702005747 SANDRA S SARRAZIN REV TRUST 7890 GARDNER DR 152 64702005763 HENDRYX,ALLEN G=&DOROTHY J 7894 GARDNER DR 153 _64702005789 ETHERIDGE,SUZANNE 7900 GARDNER DR 154 64702005802_ TRUJILLO,MARIA E 7904 GARDNER DR 155 64702005828 SAFRON III TR,ANDREW P 7908 GARDNER DR 156 64702005844 KIPYBIDA,MARTHA 7912 GARDNER DR 157 64702005860 MOORE,STEVEN C=&ROBIN W 7916 GARDNER DR I58 64702005886 R F&A F PLASENCIA TRUST 7863 GARDNER DR 159 64702005909 KINNEY,LESTER F=&DOROTHY 7867 GARDNER DR 160 64702005925 CRAPANZANO LIBURDI,MARIA G 7871 GARDNER DR 161 64702005941 GATELY,BARBARA 7875 GARDNER DR 162 _64702005967 ASHFORD III,JOHN W 7879 GARDNER DR 163 64702005983 ANNA CATALANO REV TRUST 7883 GARDNER DR 164 64702006005 MARINO,JULIO CESAR 7887 GARDNER DR 165 64702006021 SEGURA.ANGEL F=&CHRISTAL L 7895 GARDNER DR 166 64702006047 HICKEY,MICHAEL P=&DIANE M 7903 GARDNER DR 167 64702006063 JEANNE KOROM LIV TRUST _ 7909 GARDNER DR 168 64702006089 LIVRERI,KARIN _ 7913 GARDNER DR 169 64702006102 PUOPOLO,GLENN=&CONNIE 7917 GARDNER DR 170 8A 64702006128 SCUDERI,DAVE=&MARNI M 7686 GROVES RD 171 64702006144 PALOMBI,PETER J 7682 GROVES RD 172 64702006160 MCBRIDE TR,DAWN L 7678 GROVES RD 173 64702006186 BERRY,SCOTT=&JANET 7674 GROVES RD 174 64702006209 YONGE,PHILLIP R=&STEPHANIE 2713 BRANCH LN 175 64702006225 MANSIKA,JOHN 2721 BRANCH LN 176 64702006241 STEINGART,STAN=&BUN IE 2729 BRANCH LN 177 64702006267 MC ANDREW,THOMAS P=&JEANNE M 2730 BRANCH LN 178 _64702006283 PYTLIK,DOLORES R 2722 BRANCH LN 179 64702006306 PAVONE,FRANK=&FRANCES 2714 BRANCH LN 180 64702006322 ROELLER,CRAIG D 7670 GROVES RD 181 64702006348 GROVES ISA LLC 7664 GROVES RD 182 64702006364 POSDAL FAMILY TRUST _ 7660 GROVES RD 183 64702006380 ELDERT,SARKA 7656 GROVES RD 184 64703000026 SCHLENK,BRADLEY C=&GAIL S 7852 GARDNER DR 101 64703000042 NEWELL,LIANA V 7852 GARDNER DR 102 64703000068 CATALANO,CATHERINE 7852 GARDNER DR 103 64703000084 SCHULTZ,JOHN D=&NANCY E 7852 GARDNER DR 201 64703000107 RAMPAR USA LP 7852 GARDNER DR 202 64703000123 FERRER,MICHAEL L=&CRISTINA S 7852 GARDNER DR 203 64703000149 TOSCANO,ROY C 7846 , GARDNER DR 101 64703000165 PITMAN,JANICE LYNN=&DENNIS 7846 GARDNER DR 102 64703000181 KUPCHELLA,CHARLES E=&R ADELE 7846 GARDNER DR 201 64703000204 TENEROW,JOHN L 7846 GARDNER DR 202 64703000220 WAYLAND-SMITH,JUDITH L 7840 GARDNER DR 101 64703000246 POVLSEN III,PAUL K=&JENINE M 7840 GARDNER DR 102 64703000262 GEORGE ABOUSERHAL LIV TRUST 7840 GARDNER DR 201 64703000288 SIMPSON,CHRISTOPHER 7840 GARDNER DR 202 64703000301 OCONNOR LIVING TRUST 7834 GARDNER DR 101 64703000327 OUTLAND,BILLIE J=&DELORES E 7834 _ GARDNER DR 102 64703000343 STEPHENS,RYAN 7834 GARDNER DR 103 64703000369 D'AGOSTINO,JOHN=&LISA 7834 GARDNER DR 201 64703000385 CANTEY,YOUNG-BOON CHO 7834 GARDNER DR 202 64703000408 TAVALLALI,MAHBOUBEH SHANAVAZ 7834 _ GARDNER DR 203 64703000424 ALIS,SUSANNA 7828 GARDNER DR 101 _64703000440 CARROLL,GERARD T=&SUSAN W 7828 GARDNER DR 102 64703000466 ROSSI,NANCY B 7828 GARDNER DR 201 64703000482 ROONEY,JILLIAN 7828 GARDNER DR 202 64703000505 SINCLAIR,H PHILLILP IP 7822 GARDNER DR 101 64703000521 RICHARDS,STEVEN A=&NICOLE L 7822 GARDNER DR 102 64703000547 LARRY W BIRT LIVING TRUST 7822 GARDNER DR 201 64703000563 OCONNOR JR,CHARLES J 7822 GARDNER DR 202 64703000589 MONTGOMERY,KELLY 7701 GARDNER DR 101 _64703000602 MILLER,DANIEL W=&NEENA M 7701 GARDNER DR 102 64703000628 BLALOCK,KAREN S 7701 GARDNER DR 201 64703000644 , F J BILLINGS JR LIV TRUST 7701 _ GARDNER DR 202 64703000660 BIDDLE,SANDRA S 7705 GARDNER DR 101 8A 64703000686 PAUL JUHASZ M D REV TRUST 7705 GARDNER DR 102 64703000709_ TRAPANI,MARIA D 7705 GARDNER DR 201 64703000725 RIVKIN,YEFIM=&JANA 7705 GARDNER DR 202 64703000741 ALICE M FERRIS TRUST 7709 GARDNER DR 101 64703000767 SANANGELO,ROBERT _ 7709 GARDNER DR 102 64703000783 KENT T WEICKERT LIV TRUST 7709 GARDNER DR 103 _64703000806 MILLS,THOMAS J=&SUSAN 7709 GARDNER DR 201 64703000822 GAIL&TONY FAMILY TRUST 7709 GARDNER DR 202 64703000848 MITCHELL,DENNIS J=&TERESA A 7709 GARDNER DR 203 64703000864 FRANKE,BRUCE D 7717 GARDNER DR 101 64703000880 CULLEN,FRANCES 7717 GARDNER DR 102 64703000903 _DAILEY JR,LEROY F A 7717 _ GARDNER DR 201 64703000929 JAMES W STEPHENS REV TRUST 7717 GARDNER DR 202 64703000945 RICOTTA,RONALD S=&KELLY J 7725 GARDNER DR 101 64703000961 BRUINSMA,SIMON 7725 GARDNER DR 102 64703000987_ CORDES,MARK=&JEANNE 7725 GARDNER DR 103 64703001009_ NATALIA SUMYK REV LIV TRUST 7725 GARDNER DR 201 64703001025 RADEMACHER,DETLEF _ 7725 GARDNER DR 202 64703001041 _ JOHNSON,MARK=&LINDA 7725 GARDNER DR 203 _64703001067 PUMP,HARM 7720 GARDNER DR 101 64703001083 COLEMAN,GERALD C=&MARYLOU A 7720 GARDNER DR 102 64703001106 OMALLEY ET AL,OONAGH 7720 GARDNER DR 201 64703001122 DALTON,GERALDINE 7720 GARDNER DR 202 64703001148 BISSWURM TR,JOHN 7714 GARDNER DR 101 L, 64703001164 BARTHEL,ROLAND 7714 GARDNER DR 102 64703001180 HAHN,PAULA J=&MATTHEW L 7714 GARDNER DR 201 64703001203 KOWALCZYK,WILLIAM J 7714 GARDNER DR 202 64703001229 JANE W BOLTON TRUST 7708 GARDNER DR 101 64703001245 GEORGES,GEORGE N=&MARY M 7708 GARDNER DR 102 64703001261 HARRINGTON,LEO B=&CYNTHIA J 7708 GARDNER DR 201 64703001287 HIRZ,SCOTT=&JENNIFER 7708 GARDNER DR 202 _64703001300 KOLODZIEJ FAMILY TRUST 7702 GARDNER DR 101 64703001326 WOMACK SR,JERRY E 7702 GARDNER DR 102 64703001342 BEVERLY C UPTON FAMILY TRUST 7702 GARDNER DR 103 _64703001368 MARY JANE REV TRUST 7702 GARDNER DR 201 64703001384 LINDER,JOHANNES MAXIMILLIAN 7702 GARDNER DR 202 _64703001407 LINDER,JOHANNES MAXIMILLIAN 7702 GARDNER DR 203 _64703001423 HYER,BARBARA 7816 GARDNER DR 101 64703001449 GREEN,LOLA KATE 7816 GARDNER DR 102 64703001465 DEVERELL,JOHN P=&JACKIE J 7816 GARDNER DR 103 64703001481 HANLY,ANNE 7816 GARDNER DR 201 _64703001504 BALKE,AXEL 7816 GARDNER DR 202 _64703001520 WARREN,ROGER F=&LUCILLE M 7816 GARDNER DR 203 64703001546 MCGREEVEY,PATRICIA R _ 7810 GARDNER DR 101 64703001562 GIESELMAN,WALTER THOMAS 7810 GARDNER DR 102 64703001588 MECKES,ROBERT A 7810 GARDNER DR 201 64703001601 TANNER,KENNETH W 7810 GARDNER DR 202 8A 64703001627 7804-101 GARDNER DRIVE LLC 7804 GARDNER DR 101 64703001643 CURRAN,LEO J=&ISABEL NI 7804 GARDNER DR 102 64703001669 CANNIZZARO,ANTHONY F 7804 GARDNER DR 103 64703001685 HEZEKIAH,GLENDA A 7804 GARDNER DR 201 64703001708 LEWIS,LYNN ANN 7804 GARDNER DR 202 64703001724 HOWARD,ERNEST R=&KATHLEEN J 7804 GARDNER DR 203 64703001740 STROUBLE,DAVID B 7798 GARDNER DR 101 64703001766 MCDONALD,LORRAINE A 7798 GARDNER DR 102 _64703001782 HEWLITT,LAWRENCE=&PAULA 7798 GARDNER DR 201 64703001805 SEAVER,CAROL A 7798 GARDNER DR 202 64703001821 STERMER,JOANNE 7792 GARDNER DR 101 64703001847 FLYNN,JAMES P=&KATHLEEN A 7792 GARDNER DR 102 64703001863 ESTHER G MONAGHAN REV TRUST 7792 GARDNER DR 201 64703001889 DIBLASIO,CLINT J=&MARIA 7792 GARDNER DR 202 64703001902 LAWRENCE R RYAN REV TRUST 7786 GARDNER DR 101 64703001928 DURANTE,JOYCE K 7786 GARDNER DR 102 64703001944 PETERS,JAMES E=&LAURICE 7786 GARDNER DR 103 64703001960 SEGAL,SUSAN C 7786 GARDNER DR 201 64703001986 KARALIS,DEAN G 7786 GARDNER DR 202 _64703002008 GODIER,JOSEPH L 7786 GARDNER DR 203 64703002024 FARNETI,FERNANDO=&MARIA 7780 GARDNER DR 101 64703002040 DELANEY,MICHAEL J 7780 GARDNER DR 102 64703002066 JAMES B GODDARD 2008 TRUST 7780 GARDNER DR 103 L., 64703002082 CONNELLY,JEROME F 7780 GARDNER DR 201 v 64703002105 NFSCMS REVOCABLE TRUST , 7780 GARDNER DR 202 64703002121 POTTS,ANDREW D 7780 GARDNER DR 203 64703002147 HERRICK-RICKETTS,DIANNE Y 7774 GARDNER DR 101 64703002163 JANE N INFERRERA REV TRUST 7774 GARDNER DR 102 64703002189 RAMPAR USA LP 7774 GARDNER DR 201 `64703002202 BROOKS,ROBERT M 7774 GARDNER DR 202 64703002228 NELSON,WAYNE B=&ANN MARIE _ 7768 GARDNER DR 101 64703002244 COEN,JENNIFR 7768 GARDNER DR 102 64703002260 TUROCY,JUDITH N 7768 GARDNER DR 103 64703002286 BRANKO ADZICH DEC OF TRUST 7768 _ GARDNER DR 201 647030023091 VAINER,SIMON B=&LYUDMILA 7768 GARDNER DR 202 64703002325 MACDONALD,RAYMOND W=&LINDA L 7768 _ GARDNER DR 203 64703002341 EASTMAN,KELLI L 7762 GARDNER DR 101 64703002367_ DONAHUE,DIANA L 7762 GARDNER DR 102 64703002383 BURKHARDT,DOLORES M 7762 GARDNER DR 201 64703002406 RAMOS,JOHN E=&MARGARET A 7762 GARDNER DR 202 '64703002422 PONTIUS,RICK N=&DARLENE M 7756 GARDNER DR 101 _64703002448 JOHNSON,ERIC=&CASEY 7756 GARDNER DR 102 64703002464 CHEVALIER,WILLIAM E _ 7756 GARDNER DR 103 _64703002480 WEISGERBER,MICHAEL W 7756 GARDNER DR 201 64703002503 CLARENCE BECKER R/L TRUST 7756 GARDNER DR 202 64703002529 MARCINKOWSKI,ALFRED J 7756 GARDNER DR 203 64703002545 SULLIVAN FAMILY TRUST 7750 GARDNER DR 101 64703002561 _ BARTOLOTTA,JOHN L 7750 GARDNER DR 102 BA 64703002587 BUCKLEY,JOANNE 7750 GARDNER DR 103 `.., 64703002600 SMITH,VANESSA C 7750 GARDNER DR 201 _64703002626 FEORANZ,FRANK J=&PATRICIA A 7750 GARDNER DR 202 64703002642 GIORNO TR,ANTHONY 7750 _ GARDNER DR 203 64703002668 SIMMONS,RANDALL A 7744 GARDNER DR 101 64703002684 PHILIP,JEAN B=&ANNETTE M 7744 GARDNER DR 102 64703002707_ SNYDER,ROBERT F=&MIMI C 7744 GARDNER DR , 103 _64703002723 LORI ANN DRUCK REV LIV TRUST 7744 GARDNER DR 201 64703002749 KOREJKO REVOCABLE TRUST 7744 GARDNER DR 202 64703002765 CARROLL,JAMES J 7744 GARDNER DR 203 64703002781 CONDON,SEAN=&WENDY _ 7738 GARDNER DR 101 64703002804 MCGINTY,KEVIN J=&NANCY C 7738 GARDNER DR 102 64703002820 HEATON,ROBERT R 7738 GARDNER DR 103 64703002846 SMUCZYNSKI,MICHAEL D=&JULIE _ 7738 GARDNER DR 201 64703002862 7738-202 GARDNER DR LLC 7738 GARDNER DR 202 64703002888 , PAMELA J BAKER TRUST 7738 GARDNER DR 203 _64703002901 BUCKLEY,THOMAS E=&CAROL S 7732 GARDNER DR 101 64703002927 RUPERT,JEAN P 7732 GARDNER DR 102 64703002943 KRYST,JERRY 7732 GARDNER DR 103 64703002969 DENNINO,NANCY E 7732 GARDNER DR 201 64703002985_ SUSI,PAULA 7732 GARDNER DR 202 64703003007 BARTHEL,ROLAND 7732 GARDNER DR 203 `.- Pipers Grove COA Property Owners List Parcel Owner Street Full Lot ID Name Number Street Unit 67956500024 TROIANO,OLGA H 2420 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956500040 PROOS,JAMES RUSSELL 2420 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956500066 GEORGE FULTON REV LIV TRUST 2420 OLD GROVES RD 103 67956500082 ROESNER,LARRY L=&LOIS J 2420 OLD GROVES RD 104 67956500105 JOHNSON TR,WILLIAM H 2420 OLD GROVES RD 201 67956500121_ PALUMBO,CHRISTOPHER M 2420 OLD GROVES RD 202 67956500147 LACEY,ROBERT 2420 OLD GROVES RD 203 67956500163 KOHLRIESER,JOHN D 2420 OLD GROVES RD 204 67956500189 S M VANVONDEREN REV TRUST 2430 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956500202 RITTER,RONALD 2430 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956500228 BLOCK,HAROLD E=&JODI L 2430 OLD GROVES RD 103 67956500244 GASKILL,ROY=&CAROL 2430 OLD GROVES RD 104 67956500260 NOLAN,ROBERT K=&PATRICIA _ 2430 OLD GROVES RD 201 67956500286 BROOKS,ANASTASIA 2430 OLD GROVES RD 202 67956500309 FRIBUSH,LOUISE A 2430 OLD GROVES RD 203 67956500325 HANSON,MAURICE R=&ELIZABETH _ 2430 OLD GROVES RD 204 Le 67956500341 PAULA V CONLEY REV TRUST 2440 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956500367 CAHOON,DONALD C=&CYNTHIA M 2440 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956500383 DARLINGTON,LOIS K 2440 OLD GROVES RD 103 8A 67956500406 OZAKI,HITOMI 2440 OLD GROVES RD 104 67956500422 SULLIVAN,PATRICIA A 2440 OLD GROVES RD 201 67956500448 PERLEWITZ,JAMES D=&JANICE A 2440 OLD GROVES RD 202 67956500464 , HUOT,JEAN-MARIE 2440 OLD GROVES RD 203 67956500480 TAMOR,KENNETH LAWRENCE 2440 OLD GROVES RD 204 67956500503 PATRICIA A ROONEY TRUST 2450 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956500529 FURLONG,BARBARA 2450 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956500545 GUNN,JEANNETTE 2450 OLD GROVES RD 103 67956500561 TUFF,RALPH W=&KATHRYN E 2450 OLD GROVES RD 104 _67956500587 ALLEN,JOANNE T 2450 , OLD GROVES RD 201 67956500600 BAUGHMAN,BRENDA S 2450 OLD GROVES RD 202 _67956500626 R.E.C.CONSOLIDATED LLC 2450 OLD GROVES RD 203 _67956500642 MCBRIDE TRUST --I 2450 OLD GROVES RD 204 67956500668 WOODMAN JR,ALBERT LEE=&WANDA 2460 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956500684 ZEAITER,FOUAD 2460 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956500707 HUDSON,LESTER N=&LORRAINE P 2460 OLD GROVES RD 103 67956500723 SMITH,LEE ALAN 2460 OLD GROVES RD 104 67956500749 MASTROGIUSEPPE,JOHN 2460 OLD GROVES RD 201 67956500765 FITZPATRICK,MARIA BECKA 2460 OLD GROVES RD 202 67956500781 CARROLL,TERRANCE J=&SUSAN Q 2460 OLD GROVES RD 203 67956500804 RICHARD,SCOTT D=&JUDITH E 2460 OLD GROVES RD 204 67956500820 C J JONCKHEERE REV TRUST 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 101 L 67956500846 , LOVALLO,JOSEPH W 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956500862 JOANNE M MCINERNERY REV TRUST 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956500888, POGGE,BRENDA 2426 __ ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956500901 RAGONE.PAUL J=&DAWN F 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956500927 ADAMS,BRYAN EUGENE 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956500943 SEIFERT,MARY E T 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956500969 KACZMARSKI,ALEXANDER 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956500985 BARRON,BRUCE A=&TANA S 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956501007 WILLSHIRE,FRANK A 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 102 _67956501023 JONES,BRIAN MEREDITH 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956501049 MITCHELL,ROBERTA F 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956501065 VAINER,SIMON B=&LYUDMILA 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956501081 _MANVILLE,ALAYNA MARIE 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956501104 2436 ORCHID BAY TRUST 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 203 _67956501120 MACDONALD,IAN R=&JANET A 2436 ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956501146 WELLS,ARTHUR A=&NORMA E 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956501162 HAINES,PATRICIA A 2446 _ ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956501188 VANSICKLE,DOREEN 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956501201_ IVES.FREDERICK JOHN=&MYRNA C 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956501227 CZARNECKI,GEORGE J=&HELENA 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956501243 MCDONOUGH.CAROL J=&JAMES 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 202 `, 67956501269 HUDDLESTUN,MAX R 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956501285 GAMBOA,JEANETTE J=&VICTOR M 2446 ORCHID BAY DR 204 8A 67956501308 ENGER JT REVOCABLE TRUST 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956501324 LINDA J JACK LIVING TRUST 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 102 Li 67956501340 NEVOLA,MIROSLAV 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956501366 DOBRUTSKY TR,ANNE 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956501382 SYMONDS,JOHN R 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956501405 HAYES,THOMAS P 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956501421 PERILLO,GERALD 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956501447 LENNEY,WILLIAM R=&NANCY M 2456 ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956501463 BAKER,BETTY J 2470 OLD GROVES RD 101 67956501489 HELLER,WAYNE C 2470 OLD GROVES RD 102 67956501502 ROGERS,MARYANN 2470 OLD GROVES RD 103 67956501528 MATHENY REV TRUST 2470 OLD GROVES RD 104 67956501544 SULLIVAN,HARVEY 2470 _ OLD GROVES RD 201 67956501560 PISCATELLI,JOHN J=&LAURA M 2470 OLD GROVES RD 202 67956501586 SALVATORE V MASSA&GREGORY V _ 2470 OLD GROVES RD 203 67956501609 MCGLYNCHEY TR,MICHAEL _ 2470 OLD GROVES RD 204 67956501625 CASEBOLT,DELORES B 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956501641 _AVIZINIS,ROBERT=&CORINNE 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956501667 PASTERNAK,DONALD=&RITA 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 67956501683 BOCK,MARGARET 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956501706_ MONTMINY,AMY W 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 201 67956501722 HOHZORN,CONSTANZE 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956501748 RIGGIO,JUNE J 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 203 67956501764 DURRENBERGER,DAVID 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956501780 EMMONS TR,FRANCIS A 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956501803 SUSANNA L THOMPSON REV TRUST 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956501829 CHIN,GENE H 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 67956501845 GRESKOVICH,JAMES A 7425 _ PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956501861 CLESSE III,FRANCIS J 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 201 _67956501887 SILVIA,MANUEL BARBARA 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956501900 GORRA,HELEN 7425 , PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 203 67956501926 MIKLOS,BALAZS 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956501942 LARSEN,LAURA A 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956501968 MUNRO,DOUGLAS R=&VERA L 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956501984 WIMBISCUS TR,JAMES J=&JUDE T 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 67956502006 BZOWSKI,TERESA 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956502022 MC CARTHY,EDWARD D=&WINIFRED 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 201 67956502048 YOUNG,REGINA A=&JIMMY M 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956502064 NADOTTI,DIANA M _ 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 203 67956502080 RINALDI,DONATO=&MARIA 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956502103 DAURIA,ANTHONY 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956502129 MARY BLAJIAN IRREV TRUST 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956502145 BERG TR,CAROLYN H 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 L., 67956502161 DONOVAN,DANIEL J 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956502187 SWOYER,DON E 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 201 8A 67956502200 BRZOVSKI REV TRUST 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956502226 BURKS OAKLEY II TRUST 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD , 203 67956502242 BARRY&CAROL F BELT REV TRUST 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956502268 LYNN P ELIAS REV LIVING TRUST 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956502284 WILSON,GERALD H=&ELIZABETH 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956502307 MULLIGAN,DOROTHY A 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 67956502323 DELPHINE A HORVATH TRUST 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956502349 CARPANZANO,ANTHONY=&IDA 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 201 67956502365 AUER,WOLFGANG=&MADELEINE B 7426 , PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956502381 BANSKI,PAWEL=&BASIA 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 203 67956502404 KAPLAN,MURRAY L=&EDITH F 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956502420 SHELDRAKE,JILL 7416 , PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 101 67956502446 EDGAR K&NANCY E HENNEL TRUST 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 102 67956502462 WILLSHIRE,FRANK A 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 103 67956502488 BOWMAN,ALAN L=&ILDIKO 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 104 67956502501 MORAN,GARY J 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD , 201 67956502527 RAGUSA,GAETANO=&ROSALIA 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 202 67956502543 BARRETT,THOMAS ANDREW 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 203 67956502569 DERK HOLDINGS LLC 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 204 67956502585_ LOVALLO,JOSEPH=&KENIA 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956502608_ PAVLICK,GAIL D 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 67956502624 DAVID,JOHN M=&JANE E 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956502640 ADAMS,JOHN E=&REBECCA 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 104 67956502666 COUTURE.PETER=&PAMELA 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 67956502682 MOUNTFORD JR,WILLIAM E 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956502705 TOWNS,MICHAEL R 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956502721 PROKES,MARK 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 67956502747 HEALY,PHYLLIS B 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956502763 SUNNY JACARANDA LLC 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 67956502789 SMITH,PARKE E 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956502802 PATHWAYS ACCEPTANCE CO LLC 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 104 67956502828 GARRETT,BARBARA T 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 67956502844 MCQUISTON,DONNA J 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956502860 ROYCE,DANIEL=&OXANA 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956502886 BRAY,GERALD L=&MARIAN M 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 67956502909 MEZZAPELLA TR,HENRIETTA 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956502925 DINNOCENZO,DARYL 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 `67956502941 JOHN D RINGWOOD AND BARBARA A 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956502967 DEKKER,JACKIE J=&EDWARD 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 104 67956502983 NETZER,CAROL M 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 67956503005 BRANDER,STEVEN=&JUDITH 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956503021 PATRICK J MURPHY REV TRUST 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956503047 PUSCARU,LAURENTIU 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 67956503063 PHILLIPS,MIKE=&GEORGINA 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956503089 PATRICIA A ROGERS LIVING TRUST 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 8A 67956503102 STANEK,THERESA A 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956503128 SALGAT JR,HERBERT A 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 104 67956503144 PAGANO,LUIGI G 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 67956503160 PRIORY,JOSEPH D 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956503186 SEGUIN,BRIAN D=&REBECCA 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956503209 _ERICKSON,KENNETH P 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 67956503225 HANSON FAMILY TRUST 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956503241 CLARK FAMILY JT REV TRUST 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 67956503267 HERNANDEZ,JOSE OMAR 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956503283 MCFEELEY,PATRICIA 7466 , JACARANDA PARK RD 104 _67956503306 , LOUISE S WARD TRUST 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 67956503322 JETTE,JOSEPH E 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956503348 BUSTER,CLAIRE M S 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956503364 MOUNTFORD,EILEEN L 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 _67956503380 SHERIDAN,PHILIP J=&SUSAN A 7456 _ JACARANDA PARK RD 101 67956503403 WILLIAMS,HELEN K 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 102 67956503429 ANGELES,STEVE=&AMY E 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 103 67956503445 REDMOND,WILLIAM=&BERYL 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 104 67956503461 MILLER,DOROTHY L 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 201 `67956503487 _ TRACEY,JOHN J=&CAROL L 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 202 67956503500 BIRTOLO,JANINA 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 203 67956503526 BARR,DARLENE 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 204 67956503542 MALLERDINO ET AL.MICHAEL R 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956503568 DE LONG,PHILIP F=&SHIRLEY A 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956503584 STEVENSON,CHARLES W=&MARIE M 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956503607 MENARD,GLORYA 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956503623 PARADISO LAND TRUST 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956503649_ PARSONS,NORA 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956503665 AGUILAR,NOEL L 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956503681 _ DEFRANCESCO,NICOLINO 2476 ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956503704 2486 ORCHID BAY 101 TRUST 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956503720 PANNULLO.FREDERICK 2486 _ ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956503746 LABESSE,BENEDICTE A 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956503762 LEITH,LINDA K 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956503788 BLADICH,DOUGLAS J 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 201 _67956503801 RICHARD,NORMAND J=&ELAINE L 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956503827_ KOESTNER,HARALD 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 203 _67956503843 YT NAPLES LLC 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956503869 DALY FLORIDA TRUST 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956503885 BURKE,JOHN F 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956503908 LAWSON,GRACE D 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956503924 ABRAHAM,ISAAC 2496 _ ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956503940 ROSINA REINHOFER DEC OF TRUST 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 201 _67956503966 KILTZ,SHARON L 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956503982 JOLY-CHARLES,SUZANNE 2496 ORCHID BAY DR 203 I 8A 67956504004 FUSCHILLO,BRIAN 2496 E ORCHID BAY DR 204 67956504020 SAVELL,HELENE B 2506 I ORCHID BAY DR 101 L, 67956504046 PETERSEN,FLORENCE 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956504062 RAIN,SUSAN A 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956504088 MARTHA L LUTGERT TRUST 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956504101 COX,MICHAEL=&LORIE 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 201 _67956504127 STANTON III,HOWARD 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956504143 BATTAGLIA,RICHARD C 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956504169 CHAMPION,MICHAEL=&KATHLEEN _ 2506 ORCHID BAY DR 204 _67956504185 BERGER,LEONARD L 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956504208 TUZZOLO,JAMES A=&BARBARA M _ 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956504224 POHOUSKY,JOYCE 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956504240 STEPHEN D KODER TRUST 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956504266 TANTILLO,ROBERT J=&ROSE M 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956504282 MORELLI,ANGELA 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956504305 ST-ONGE,JEAN-CLAUDE 2516 ORCHID BAY DR . 203 67956504321 SCHWAB FAMILY TRUST 2516 ORCHID BAY DR 204 _67956504347 CONWELL,KELLY D 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 101 67956504363 STEVENS,MARY E 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 102 67956504389_ BARBARA GOOTKIN REV TRUST 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 103 67956504402 NELLER,JOHN D=&CATHY L 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 104 67956504428 SMITH,RICHARD D=&MARILYN H 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 201 67956504444 DIMAIO,STANISLAO 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 202 67956504460 SPANGLER,PHYLLIS 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 203 67956504486 KLUCKA,DIANE M 2526 ORCHID BAY DR 204 North Groves COA Property Owners List Parcel Owner Street Full Lot ID Name Number Street Unit 64080000024 FORTE,JOHN A=&ROSE 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000040 AUDETTE FAMILY REV TRUST 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000066 MYKYTENKO,ANDRE A 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 103 64080000082 KEOWN,PATRICK 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 104 64080000105 ROLFE,JAMES K=&AUGUSTA M 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000121 MARTIN,CLARA W 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000147 DRUGMAND,DAVID=&PATRICIA 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 203 64080000163 COMOLLI,PETER J=&PAULINE M 7504 OLEANDER GATE DR 204 64080000189 ANDERSON FAMILY LIV TRUST 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000202 HILGERT,CHRISTINE C 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000228 PETKOVSKI,JOVAN=&JASMINA 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 103 64080000244 GERALDINE AMOS REV TRUST 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 104 64080000260 ACABEDO,FERNANDO=&LORETA 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 L 64080000286 QUESSY,JEAN-GUY=&PATRICIA 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000309 RACO FAMILY TRUST 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 203 8A 64080000325 MCNAMARA,TERESA P 7528 OLEANDER GATE DR 204 64080000341 LYONS TR,CORNELIUS T 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000367 TEKCAN,MUSTAFA 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000383 BOLDUC,MARIE 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 103 64080000406 HANNEKEN,BRENDA Y 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 104 64080000422 THOMPSON,MICHAEL C 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000448 GERHARD ALTHAUS TRUST 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000464 HASSETT,RAYMOND M=&DENISE L 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 203 64080000480 MARINO,FELICIA 7552 OLEANDER GATE DR 204 64080000503 HARRIS,KAREN SUE 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000529 SABIA,RONALD R 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000545 KAREN F NORTH LIVING TRUST 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 103 64080000561 POWER,STEPHEN J=&MARIA C 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 104 64080000587 FREY,PAUL J 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000600 DELGADO,BERNARDO E=&JUDITH D 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000626 JOHN W HARTIGAN DEC OF TRUST 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 203 64080000642 MC DONALD JR,JOHN A=&FRANCES 7576 OLEANDER GATE DR 204 64080000668 SYLVIA,PATRICIA L 7600 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000684 WRIGHT,RANDOLPH E=&SANDRA G 7600 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000707 WILSON,DAVID R 7600 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000723 PINTO,MARY ANN 7600 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000749 SHOEMAKER,PATRICIA ARLENE 7616 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000765 SELVIA,KARA JAYNE 7616 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 `.. 64080000781 LOVELL,PETER R=&MAUREEN P 7616 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000804 HARDY II,B MARVIN=&DONNA M 7616 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000820 RAYMOND,BRUCE V=&MARY E 7632 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000846 ARED B KOCHOUMIAN&LOUCIA G 7632 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000862 GROFF,JUVY=&WILLIAM 7632 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000888 PINEAPPLE PROP INVSTMT LLC 7632 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000901 LINK,ROWLAND=&GLORIA 7648 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080000927 LANDI,FRANK A=&VALERIE A 7648 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080000943 ROGERS,IAN=&SHARON 7648 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080000969 PARROTTA,DOMENICO=&MARIA 7648 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080000985 READMAN,CAROLE 7664 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080001007 DAVIS,JAMES FRED 7664 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080001023 MCLEAN,FLORENCE ANNE 7664 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080001049 BREWER,ROBERT D=&H MARIE 7664 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080001065 CIRCELLI,DAVID J=&CYNTHIA G 7680 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080001081 MASER,HAROLD &EILEEN L 7680 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080001104 WOZNIAK,ANDREW J 7680 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080001120 DITRIA FAMILY TRUST 7680 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 64080001146 LAROSA,DOROTHY 7696 OLEANDER GATE DR 101 64080001162 WILSON,DONALD G=&LUEWAN J 7696 OLEANDER GATE DR 102 64080001188 CURCIO,JAMES=&JUDITH 7696 OLEANDER GATE DR 201 64080001201 UNDERBRINK,ROBERT S=&GAY 7696 OLEANDER GATE DR 202 8A 64080001227 WITTKAMPER,JANICE E 2585 OLD GROVES RD 101 64080001243 DAVENPORT JR,B HADDON 2585 OLD GROVES RD 102 64080001269 JOHN F SCHAEFER&SHARON L 2585 OLD GROVES RD 103 64080001285 MUSSIO,ALBERTA J 2585 OLD GROVES RD 104 64080001308 MCNAMARA,JOHN E=&TERESA P 2585 OLD GROVES RD 201 64080001324 MCCORD III,EVINS V 2585 OLD GROVES RD 202 64080001340 SCHUCK,FRANCIS R 2585 OLD GROVES RD 203 64080001366 NGUYEN,TUAN THANH 2585 OLD GROVES RD 204 64080001382 P• ONTIUS,ROBERT=&PATRICIA A 2575 OLD GROVES RD 101 64080001405 S• HEPPARD JR,JACK C=&ALICE H 2575 OLD GROVES RD 102 64080001421 R• OMAC,DONALD J=&CARMELA - 2575 OLD GROVES RD 103 64080001447 D• ARCY-ALLEN,SUSAN 2575 OLD GROVES RD 104 64080001463 PETKOVSKI,MIODRAG 2575 OLD GROVES RD 201 64080001489 ' K• IDD,ROBERT LEE 2575 OLD GROVES RD 202 64080001502 SMITH,ROBERT A 2575 OLD GROVES RD 203 64080001528 NORAT,DAVID E=&USA 2575 OLD GROVES RD 204 64080001544 MCLEAN,MICHAEL=&DIANE 2565 OLD GROVES RD 101 64080001560 DIGIOVANNI,DIANE 2565 OLD GROVES RD 102 64080001586 KLIMM,DAVID M=&SHARON M 2565 OLD GROVES RD 103 64080001609 PARSONS,SUSAN 2565 OLD GROVES RD 104 64080001625 FRIES,ROBERT S=&PAULA W 2565 OLD GROVES RD 201 64080001641 BARTEK,STEVEN R 2565 OLD GROVES RD 202 64080001667 7 JAHN,ROBERT=&THERESA 2565 OLD GROVES RD 203 64080001683 200 PARK AVENUE LLC 2565 OLD GROVES RD 204 64080001706 RUTECKI TR,BERNICE M 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080001722 THOMSON,ARCHIBALD CAMPBELL 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080001748 SMITH,WENDY 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080001764 J P&K M BERGER REV LIV TRUST 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080001780 KOCH,WILLIAM - 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080001803 ERACE,FRANCESCA 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080001829 SHAPOV,MARK=&FAINA 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080001845 KHROMOVA,NATALIA 7502 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080001861 BERMAN,MARGARET L 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080001887 CONROY,PATRICK=&MARGARET 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080001900 DANSEREAU,CHRISTIAN J 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080001926 SAUERWEIN,WERNER=&DORIS 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080001942 BACHMAN,BRUCE A 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080001968 VICKERS,JAMES A=&SUSAN J 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080001984 CIVITELLO,LOUIS A=&CONNIE 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080002006 GIGLIOTTI TR,BERNARD J 7505 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002022 CHARLES W KIRBY REV TRUST 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080002048 VALENTE TR,CATHERINE M 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080002064 CONNOR,PATRICIA A 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 L, 64080002080 HANSEN,SUSAN A _ 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080002103 COOGAN,CYNTHIA L 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 8A 64080002129 1 ANDERSON,CARL=&BRYNN 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080002145 f DILL,ROMAYNE E 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 _64080002161 AITCHISON,DAVID 7518 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002187 MARGUERITE T COOK TRUST 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080002200 RODIA,JOHN L=&DIANNE M 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080002226 KENNY,JOHN=&EILEEN 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080002242 MUGFORD,WINSTON 0=&MARINA L 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080002268 MARZANO,DYANNE 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080002284 BECHTOLD,DAVID=&SHEREE 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080002307 ENKIN,VLADIMIR I=&RITA 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080002323 HOLLY,GERALD M=&KATHLEEN 7529 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002349 OSGOOD,FREDERICK N=&MARLA F 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080002365 NIEMCZURA,WALTER M=&JANICE 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080002381 VENTRESCA,LESLIE 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080002404 TAYLOR,NANCY M 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080002420 JEANNETTE L KUSKA RES DE TRUST 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080002446 CLAYTON,PATRICIA 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 ^64080002462 VAROSKI,DAVID A 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080002488 PHILBRICK,THOMAS D=&SANDRA F 7553 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002501 HARKNESS,HARLEY 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080002527 TRACEY,JOHN J=&CAROL L 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080002543 ASHFORD LIVING TRUST 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080002569 O'CONNELL,EDMUND=&KATHLEEN F 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 `.. 64080002585 ANDRZEJEWSKI,RICHARD J 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080002608 SIVILLI,MICHELE=&ANTONIETTA 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080002624 JOHNSON,RICHARD E 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080002640 MAURO SR,THOMAS R=&MARY C 7577 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002666 MELVYN A J MENEZES REV TRUST 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 101 64080002682 TORO,MARIO A=&JULIE A 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 102 64080002705 FINKELE,WILLIAM R=&YVETTE 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 103 64080002721 SAMPOGNA,ANTHONY=&JOANNE 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 104 64080002747 CINDY MUELLER FAMILY TRUST 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 201 64080002763 NICOL,THOMAS J=&PATRICIA M 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 202 64080002789 O'HAVER TR,THOMAS C=&MARY L 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 203 64080002802 JOHN NITTOLO REVOCABLE TRUST 7564 SILVER TRUMPET LN 204 64080002828 TURCHI,FRANCO 2605 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080002844 HUGHES,JOSEPH E 2605 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 64080002860 JOHNSON TR,TERRY W=&PAMELA 2605 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080002886 BARRON,BRUCE A=&TANA S M 2605 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 64080002909 ALLEN,MARGUERITE A 2615 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080002925 PALAMARA,VINCENT=&TINA C 2615 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 64080002941 TURCHI,THERESA ROSSANO 2615 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080002967 MUELLER,GEORG ANDREAS 2615 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 64080002983 H KENNETH&JANET CAIN TRUST 2625 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080003005 MAROSY,BELA=&MARGIT 2625 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 8A 64080003021 V B&B J LOGAN DEC OF TRUST 2625 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080003047 SHAMASH,EMIL=&IRENE 2625 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 64080003063 CLIFFORD,ANN E 2635 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080003089 ALLARD SR,MICHAEL J 2635 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 64080003102 PATTEN,SUSAN E 2635 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080003128 LOGGI,DANIEL G=&MARY ETTA 2635 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 64080003144 ARIETTA,BRUNO V=&MARGARET L 2645 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080003160 GEIBEL,KAREN SUE 2645 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 64080003186 PRESTIA TR,CHARLES R 2645 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080003209 ROSENBAUM,HELENE=&JERRY 2645 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 64080003225 VARVARO,PETER=&MARION D 2655 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 101 64080003241 W H&M J BRANDON JT R/L TRUST 2655 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 102 64080003267 MEDVED,DONALD C=&MARGARET M 2655 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 201 64080003283 LEFFERTS,PETER C=&JODIE A 2655 MAGNOLIA PARK LN 202 EXHIBIT 8 24A FRIDAY, APRIL 5. 2019 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Nnticr of ON1ciaLlnterpretutien I 8f Cdflljsr County Land Dcveloomset Code Ordinance Pursuant to Section 10.03.06.P of the Collier County Laud Development Code(LOC),public notice is hereby given of an official interpretation. RE:INTP-2019-PL-0062,OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION REQUESTING THE COWER COUNTY ZONING DIRECTOR DETERMINE WHETHER THE VINEYARDS PUD AND THE PLANNING APPROVALS FOR THE GROVES AND THE ORCHARDS REQUIRE MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS AT VANDERBILT BEACH PROVIDE AND TO TIE ORCHARDS LLING ROAD,THEREBY REQUIRING QTHROUGH�OLD GROVES ROAD PIPERS GROVE SUBDIVISION RPORT - PULLING ROAD. Pro}act Location > Vanderbilt Beach RD -a 9 O Old Grove.RD .. -4 Z ViNEr.1RCS ( C 0 73 t 0 e {The Collier County Zoning Director has been requested to render an official interpretation for the Vineyards PUD regarding required access points and availability for all development within the Vineyards PUD to be able to utilize all required access points Within the request foe the Official Interpretation,you raise five points: 1. The Vineyards PID governs the property in question.The original ordinance is 85-15,and it has been amended several times There Was a substantial PUD amendment approved by the BOCC in 1991.Ordinance 91.75 states the following on page 46.Miscellaneous: "Access to the project shall be restricted to those access points shown on Etvbits A-1 and A-2 hereto,provided that the location of the access to commercial parcels shall be approved by the County Engineer." Exhibits A-I anti A-2 from nance 3.Those exhibits clearly show communities west of Livingston Road are Exhibit-75 are enclosed as e supposedt have accesso bth Vanderbilt Beach Road and all Airoort-Pulling Road. 2. Within the Piper Grove planned subdivision approval a memorandum form the Transportation planning staff Stated that the subdivision site plan provides interconnection to the adjacent tract to the east (i.e.The Orchards). 3. The Site Development Plan for the Orchards reviewed by the CCPC contained a memorandum which stated. "access to the proposed subdivision is from Vanderbilt Beach Road....And Airport-Pulling road...- 4. oad.."J Within the plat for Piper's Grove One,within the general notes,the plat states,"Old Groves Road is subject to an easement in favor of Prot-rrxi Bros.Sales Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation.their successors and assigns,an owner of a contiguous tract consisting of approximately 84 acres to the cast of Piper's Grove for vehicular and pedestrian access and egress,pursuant to a Declaration of Restrictions recorded at O.R.Book 1898, Pages 2308.2318.of the Public Records of Collier County.Florida" 5. References a Declaration of Easement,recorded on December 29.1993.within O.R.Book 1898,Page 2308, Collier County, Florida Public Records The easement as indicated through n point fold provides for access in favor of Tract B C and D(the Orchards) to Airport-Pulling Road Groves Road". As you have indicated within your first point of the Official Interpretation,the Vineyards PUD is the controlling regulatory document for the Orchards,Piper's Grove One and Pipers Grove Two. From review of the Original PUD (Ordinance 85-151 and subsequent amendments(Ord.91-75 and Ord.95.62),the PUD is devoid of specific commitments that all atxass points must be made available to each development tract within the PUD.Within the Master Plans for the various iterations of the PUD.an interconnected street systems provided for,but there is no provision that permits or restricts the placement of gates within the internal PUD. This lack of information designating the location of gates is common to most PUDs.as the internal streets are private and maintained by appropriate homeowners'associations. Further according to the subdivision plat,Old Groves Road is a private mad. Further,there is no Community Development District for the Vineyards,therefore,there are no public or quasi-public roads. The easement referenced within O.R.Book 1898.Page 2308,Collier County,Florida Public Records,in favor of Procacci Bros.Sales Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,their successors and assigns.an owner of a contiguous tract consisting of approximately 84 acres to the east of Piper's Grove for vehicular and pedestrian access and egress is a private easement between two parties. The requested official interpretation seeks affirmation that either the Vineyards PUD or Collier County Land Development Code(LDC)requires that the Orchards community is provided access through Old Grooves Road and from review of both documents,there is no such commitment or requirement. While the Vineyards PUD and Master Plan depicts the roadways within the development.both are silent to the location of gates and a commitment that all development within the PUD will be provided access to all the depicted roadways Within 30 days of publication of the public notice,any affected property owneror aggrievedor adverselydwtr defined affected party may appeal the interpretation to the Board of Zoning Appeals(B An affected oP pe Y as an owner of property within 300 feet of the property lines of the land for which the interpretation is effective.An aggrieve or adversely affected party is defined as any person or group of persons which will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by the Collier County Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code.A request for appeal must be fled in writing and must state the basis for the appeal and include any pertinent information. ethibits,or other back-up information m support of the appeal. The appeal must be accompanied by a 51.000.00 application and processing fee elf payment is:n the form of a check,it should be made out to the Collier County Board of Commissioners) An appeal can be hand delivered or mailed to my attention at the address provided Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further questions on this matter. The interpretation file and other pertinent information related to this interpretation are kept on file and maybe reviewed at the Growth hfanagement Division.Planning and Regulation building at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples.FL 34104.Please contact the staff member below at(239)25..6819 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. 1 8A '$ EXHIBIT ' 1 CI g 4,2i.... • • .org 1D ' � � ,, 5t0104% , department of State I Division of Corporations I Search Records / Detail By Document Number I Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation THE ORCHARDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. Filing Information Document Number N94000001358 FEI/EIN Number 65-0475569 Date Filed 03/15/1994 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Naples, FL 34109 Changed:07/06/2017 `_ Mailing Address 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Naples, FL 34109 Changed: 07/06/2017 Registered Agent Name&Address Kelly,James 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Naples, FL 34109 Name Changed: 04/18/2019 Address Changed:07/06/2017 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title President Frasher, Sheila 9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Naples, FL 34109 Title VP Mansika. John 8A .,, 2 t all 1/4.... .- . : - - -, ,•-,,•a:-. . 7, ,. I = o - 1 0' — "111111 i 2 ._, '.""D"•:. . 0 ( . CO,. 1 12 I 0. • ... ,,..4 .... . a air. g• . :.•• a g 1 . .:. ...• 1 F;" ^ NI(1'17 0" • ()I I II .: .FIItlIt „..t..., r,,, , . ,.. 0'; ;;. • 1 a .0 t .i ir 1 Oaka(616 ,i 5 CO ''= . 2 .,.• - z 1 .... Ilic :111101.10. L Ovat ..t 01 pt cc02.1.73 , • s • • . . . f'1 bell. 2' i .. . I , : 3- . .. .. . .. ,._ , ic„, :.,. - ai vz 1 - 1 i I . o°3 o 2 3 0. . • ,g) 5: .. 7? 0 .cci Col T.a a , - \ IS cs40,, N. .-.1. c (.4 2 ; 3 4 I • .1 a 0) i 0 sonims. ii.......emm"• I 03 0 5 0 .o•D 1. 0 1 CV -; C4 i 1 $ EXHIBIT .= w 8A 0. i t - - J . i Ian.... S 4. LIm 0 N A F #71. 1 4 .. I a . . . porpoN31--.__. _ , t © ` S t l'ilt � ; • ...4 r I O♦ 16 \{`� 3 � , O f .. ! _ •. !i . CO O I . , 1.1 i I 43?.i.&e".. i 6rage' o • i 0 0' v a 5 ,._ ._ s p O • i • ' 7. s 0 r. 5 1 CO CY0 © v C34 to d o • az i. co 0a A CCC�S 4 Le 0 AN i 9. 8A am am • ..,„ . .... •- ,-., •. . •,. 44•.? :i•'•'; • `iif ' ' •-• : Ilei, • ..i.. i ; . P* , • ,. • ak ' , • . • 't : . . •71,t `F` ---7—, --.7:-------•-•—•;: 1 I 1 , , . ' •-•14.: -...diecu.. FL' 1 I i -1.1 1 1 'I,• ( 1 7 '. . : 0 ___ • ! ! ! 11 . :II - --, 13 1 I Illiiiiiii 1 ,c 01' 1 , I ' , ... . . . • , . 7 7 . • , . :.... N,, • 3, ' sr, • I. ,,,.• . . 3....*: ! r11.1 t * ad,. . r•-- ......: • • 3 • ....411i-z.. : 0 :u.N7.... i' . , i - 1 . 8 , :0,.........„_‘.. .,,•• ,... ..__ , ,,i . IZ . /4;4,•, 1 .'. . te :' ' • :• la 1 - a rr 1: .•co'411A11 , . . • r.. 11100111.111. V l' El It... •2 I 0 ,P h il (II t I li 4 lifo . 11 Mtn I 11 1. 1 II r 01li ,rist , .. . 0 ,, ,i.„„„, . ..,,,li • • ..:17.2.7.1.,..„• _ I/ • Ili q lit.iiiiii 0 1 . itiiii, . Iii :0,...........,,,0 r 11 1 _. 1 I IIii:iii . . . ,../1;ji-b.„ . ;i; I 1.,1., ..,.!", ', 2 .4. •• • $ do . .1.111( . LI • , ...: 1. .. ./. • • . ' s ' ' • 11 - ir- OsiCAAdra 4 . 1 ii 11 • . .. .--. • :i.. 'II si . ,_•11c. p,,c.c.$6., • . ...• :./ . • r..4s _ ,., ...iciv" ,.1 sl: • . . . • t... $. 01 . $ 4....:,.., . , ,...... . G ° li , ; , .11: III ' li II I II ii 111 I 1 / . . • 114 " 1 1 ..,11.2. Iiiii 1 111 . ii,V ...1! +ill 51 r . ••• ....ir,......1.4,. ...„..:.......,- •_ ,.1 p:.„ • Iii II .. 01 c-- . • • • Ai lc .(k • . , ., • • I ", tkccf•ssh I. 11 . ' I • • • • . .. . • • • w:...0. . .,,. • r4i: tXHIGIT“A-15 of ORD:NASCE 90-73 , i • .- • - , .g : C 1 . . . t. a 045,,,372 : • . . .- .. .. . i--- 1 ' • Y.%--.. ------- ' i ... 8A •• •• •• :1•:';1,. : iNG . - HUT I hia I• ts., .A'N'v,-------\* '''''-;""141 . I Ii 11 ; i � t : t X1(1 • .. iT;� It0 ' W 6. \.. ..toll rn... ••••1101 4. I • : *--;146.• ',* I: 1111 ra t ' wx . • N . ,-...-‘7.1.- .FliA\ i' ,6 . - 1 1:1111111111141231E\"'.. I. . ji' "","' ' -4, i,, 01 lilt i 1! .1. = II 1 � � X ( c j• .,, Orc'i4(d5 I • • • .. (11 • . . • .�,r 1 V6rdt(1'fkl• kcc475 V.4 ! Pill • • ,... ©*mit ----41o • ill .o 1t l' K' JiL2 _ W!1 iii i;! ora ,it 1jt1 � MI g45373 • •• :- \ e „ • : . . n. . August 13, 1991 8 A Its O6S1 • 011DINANCE 91-76 RI PETITION NO. PUD-84-30(4) , (COMPANION TO PETITION DOA-91-4) , BARBARA EINDERSON CAWLEY, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON AND PETE, INC. , REPRESENTING THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REQUESTING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO THE VINEYARDS OF NAPLES PUD TOR PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) AND GOLDEN OATS ESTATES, NORTH 07 PINE RIDGE ROAD (C.R. 696) AND SOUTH 07 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (C.R. 862) , CONSISTING 07 1 ,925.4 ACRES - ADOPTED AS AMENDED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on July 25, 1991 , as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition No. PUD-84-30(4) , (Companion to Petition DOA-91-4) , filed by Barbara Henderson Cawley, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. , representing the Vineyards Development Corporation, requesting a Planned Unit Development amendment to the Vineyards of Naples PUD. Planner Milk presented Petition PUD-84-30(4) , companion to Petition DOA-91-4. He said both petitions have exactly the same language incorporated into the PUD Document. He noted as presented in the insubstantial deviation determination, the Vineyards is asking for an additional 140,000 square feet of commercial and a hotel/motel use while reducing the number of residential dwelling units from 6,978 by 1,370 for a total of 5,608 units. He mentioned this will result in a reduction of 954 units from the currently approved 3,071 single • family units, of which 103 are built at this time. He said multi- family units will be reduced from 3,907 to 3, 491 units, adding that • 264 units are in existence this date. He stated the PUD Document is being amended to incorporate the R-1 and R-2 land use classifications into the Residential category, to establish a Village Square Center adjacent to the Vineyards Middle School, to provide minimum rights-of- way for public and private roads and to reflect the necessary regula- tory standards applicable to today's governing ordinance. Also, he said, the PUD Document is being amended to eliminate the CIC Interchange Commercial District and replace it with the Commercial District . He explained this is now an approved activity center by virtue of the Growth Management Plan, therefore, the developer will EXH BIT U U 9 Page 8 August 13, 1991 8 "' be allowed to have the flexibility to encourage numerous commercial • uses to satisfy both the Vineyards and the traveling public. Planner Milk provided the Board with additional language changes dealing with polling places. (Copy on file with the Clerk to the Board. ) He requested the language be added as Section 207 in the PUD Document. Planner Milk also requested Section 2.05 B) be changed to read, "Site Development Plan approval may be used to identify the specific development standards from the Collier County Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time building permits are sought for any uses that do not clearly fall within the general standards of this document." He then referred to Section 4.02 B)3) , to be amended to state, "All deve- lopment standards shall be in accordance with the Collier County Zoning Regulations in effect at the time which building permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein." Planner Milk continued with proposed language changes to Sections 8.02 D)2) , General Development Commitments; 6.02 A)3) , Golf Course; 3.03 A)4) , Residential; and 5.02 A(3) , Commercial/Retail. (Copy on file with the Clerk to the Board. ) Mary Morgan, Supervisor of Elections, communicated her concern with regard to the proposed language dealing with polling places. She indicated her understanding that the developer was to ensure, when property was sold to churches, that the churches would agree to be utilized as polling places. She stated that language has not been mentioned in the proposed amendments. Pam Mac'Kie with Cummings and Lockwood, representing the peti- tioner, commented that a PUD is a public record and as such, the com- mitment of common areas to be used as polling places ensures that Ms. Morgan's rights are protected in that regard. She also mentioned the proposed language is derived from the County's model PUD. Ms. Morgan reiterated her concern that churches be required to provide space for polling areas in the future should the need arise from within the Vineyards development, but not limited to that pro- 1111 Ceti FA',, 17 Page 9 8A August 13, 1991 ject. • Commissioner Volpe agreed with Ms. Morgan's concern and asked if additional language may be inserted to make sure adequate polling areas are available? Ms. Mac'Kie reported the Village Square section of the PUD is designed for those kind of community center activities. Commissioner Shanahan questioned if the language being considered in the Unified Land Development Code (ULDC) includes further protec- tion for future polling places? Planner Nino stated the PUD section of the proposed ULDC includes a requirement for polling places. He said the Board can direct Staff to improve the language to address the specific concerns of Ms. Morgan. Tape n Commissioner Shanahan coved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, to close the public hearing. Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse, to approve Petition PUD-84-30(4) with the changes as recommended by Staff and with the commitment of the developer to improve 4th Avenue SW to County standards in conjunction with the iaproveaent of Arbor Boulevard. County Manager Dorrill requested the Board provide Ms. Morgan with an opportunity to review the Development Order before it is finalized, with respect to polling places. Commissioner Shanahan commented the intent is to have a satisfac- tory arrangement between the Vineyards and Ms. Morgan. Ms. Mac'Kie stated that can be accomplished by amending the PUD to add the language as proposed by Staff. Upon call for the question, the motion carried unanimously, thereby adopting the Ordinance as numbered and titled below, and entered into Book No. 48: ORDINANCE 91-78 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER B5-15, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE VINEYARDS OF NAPLES PUD, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE TITLE PAGE; BY AMENDING THE INDEX TO DELETE CERTAIN SECTIONS; BY 000r1-:: 18 Page 10 August 13, 1991 8 A AMENDING THE LIST OF EXHIBITS TO IDENTIFY THE TWO MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS; BY AMENDING THE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE TO REFLECT THE INCREASE IN TOTAL ACREAGE FROM 1 ,925.4 TO 1 ,930. 16 ACRES, TO DELETE THE RATING POINTS REQUIREMENT AND TO ADD THE PROJECT'S DESIGNATION AS BEING LOCATED IN PART OF AN INTERSTATE ACTIVITY CENTER; BY AMENDING SECTION I, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION, TO CORRECT ERRORS IN THE PREVIOUS LEGAL DESCRIPTION, TO REFLECT AN INCREASE IN THE TOTAL ACREAGE, TO • INCLUDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ADDITIONAL 4 .76 ACRE PARCEL AND TO REFLECT THE CORRECT OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY; BY AMENDING SECTION II , PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, TO REPLACE OBSOLETE LANGUAGE WITH CURRENT ZONING CODE REFERENCES, TO REQUIRE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN USES, TO CLARIFY THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, TO DELETE CONCEPTUAL/SITE PLAN APPROVAL, TO DELETE THE ALLOWANCE OF AUTOMATIC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, TO DECREASE THE OVERALL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON THE LAND USE SCHEDULE, TO COMBINE THE R-1 AND R-2 DESIGNATIONS INTO A NEW R DESIGNATION, TO COMBINE THE CR AND CIC DESIGNATIONS INTO A NEW CR DESIGNATION, TO INCREASE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BY 140,000 SQUARE FEET, TO ADD A 120-ROOM HOTEL/MOTEL USE, TO UPDATE THE APPROXIMATE ACREAGES OF E, VS, P, MAJOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES, TO INCREASE THE TOTAL ACREAGE TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF 4.76 ACRES, TO DECREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND TO DECREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE, TO ELIMINATE SUBSECTION 2.08 AND TO TRANSFER THAT INFORMATION TO SUBSECTION 3.02, TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CHURCHES, TO ELIMINATE SUBSECTION 2. 10 AND TO TRANSFER THOSE USES TO SECTIONS III, IV, V, VI AND VII OF THE PUD DOCUMENT AS APPROPRIATE, TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS WITHIN THE SIGNAGE SUBSECTION, TO ADD A SUBSECTION FOR COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE EAST OF I-75, TO ADD A REQUIREMENT FOR POLLING PLACES, AND TO ELIMINATE SUBSECTION 2. 11.04, COMPARABLE TABLE; BY AMENDING SECTION III, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THAT SECTION TO RESIDENTIAL, TO ADD LANGUAGE DEFINING THE R DESIGNATION ON THE MASTER LAND USE PLAN, TO ADD LANGUAGE CLARIFYING THE TYPES OF USES PERMITTED IN THE DISTRICT, TO MODIFY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE R DISTRICT AND TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF-STREET PARKING; BY DELETING SECTION IV, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN ITS ENTIRETY AND MERGING THAT SECTION WITH SECTION III , RESIDENTIAL, AND TO RENUMBER THE SUBSEQUENT SECTIONS AND SUBSECTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; BY AMENDING FORMER SECTION V (NOW SECTION IV) , VILLAGE SQUARE TO ADD DAY CARE CENTERS AS A PERMITTED USE, TO REQUIRE THAT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED MUST COMPLY WITH COLLIER COUNTY ZONING REGULATIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR SETBACKS FROM EXTERNAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES FROM 45 TO 60 FEET; BY AMENDING FORMER SECTION VI (NOW SECTION V) , COMMERCIAL, TO ELIMINATE THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND INTERCHANGE COMMERCIAL, TO ADD CERTAIN PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ADD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL USES, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM 460,000 TO 600,000 SQUARE FEET, TO ADD A 120 ROOM HOTEL/MOTEL USE, TO DELETE THE INTERCHANGE COMMERCIAL AND PROPERTY REGULATIONS SUBSECTIONS AND TO MERGE CERTAIN STANDARDS PERTAINING TO THOSE SUBSECTIONS WITH SUBSECTION 5.03; BY AMENDING SECTION VII (NOW SECTION VI ) , GOLF COURSE, TO ADD COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION AS A PERMITTED USE AND RESTROOM FACILITIES AS AN ACCESSORY USE; BY AMENDING SECTION VIII (NOW SECTION VII) , RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE/PARK, TO ELIMINATE CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION IX (NOW SECTION VIII) , GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS, TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, TO MODIFY REGULATIONS REGARDING EXCAVATION, TO ADD A REQUIREMENT OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT TO A WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL STRUCTURE, AND TO ADD CLARIFICATION LANGUAGE RELATING TO EXCEPTIONS FROM THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND PROJECT ACCESS POINTS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 11(10,-.v. 19 Page 11 8A Item #12B3 ORDINANCE 95-62 RE PETITION PUD-84-30(5) MICHEL SAADEH, PRESIDENT AND CEO OF VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE VINEYARDS PUD MASTER PLAN WEST OF INTERSTATE I-75 - ADOPTED Madam Chairman, there was a request to skip forward as soon as we had a full board and hear item -- I believe it's 12(B) (3) . CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: 12(B) (3) ? COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Because that's what our -- these members of the public have been waiting all morning for. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. Why don't we do that and move forward, and we'll hear petition PUD 84-30, amendment 5. MR. MILK: Good afternoon, commissioners. For the record, my name is Bryan Milk. I'd like to bring to your attention -- this is -- there's three petitions here we need to hear and vote on this afternoon: Petitions PUD 84-30, DOA 95-3, and then this board needs to make a determination that this petition is a insubstantial deviation to the development order currently in place. Good afternoon. My name is Bryan Milk. I'd like to move over to the map at this time. The petitioner is proposing a master plan change to the Vineyards PUD for that portion lying west of I-75. There's approximately 550 acres in this segment of the Vineyards PUD. Specifically the petitioner is requesting to relocate 24 acres of existing commercial zoning from the southeast intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and future Livingston Road to the southeast intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. In exchange there's 24 acres of existing residential that abuts Airport and Vanderbilt, and they wish to relocate that to where the commercial exists. This partic -- particular intersection already has approximately 6 acres of commercial zoning at the intersection and would have, therefore, 30 acres of commercial zoning at the intersection. This is a future activity center which means that in this particular area there is 160 acres of activity center designation for that purpose of mixed use, commercial, residential, multi-family. This exchange of zoning would make this compliant with the future land use element and map of the Growth Management Plan. This particular area where the commercial exists today is an urban designated area. The commercial during the zoning reevaluation process was exempt as was this commercial over here. This change in relocation would also make the map comply with the Golden Gate mast -- or the comprehensive master plan. Staff has received letters from the Southwest Florida Planning Commission and the Department of Community Affairs stating they had no objection, that they did not intend to appear before this board to object to the proposed map change. The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on October the 19th and by a vote of seven to zero recommended approval. There was, however, many residents of the _ Piper's Grove residential community located to the south and east of the project that had concerns with the proposed commercial abutting their neighborhood. Those concerns addressed intensity of traffic, pollution, noise, crime. EXHIBIT Z W LL A At that point they had asked the developer to provide additional buffering and a fence around the perimeter that would abut their property. At that particular time the planning commission rejected that idea and approved it with no conditions. If I can answer any other questions, I'd be happy to do so. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Commissioner Norris. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Did I hear you say we're swapping 24 acres at one location for 24 acres at another one? MR. MILK: That -- that's correct. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: There's no -- no change in acreage. MR. MILK: There's no change in acreage, density, or intensity of commercial area. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. Now, you also, I think, said that that's an activity center, future activity center, at Airport and Vanderbilt Drive, Vanderbilt -- MR. MILK: That's correct. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: -- Beach Road I guess it is, isn't it? MR. MILK: That's correct. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: If -- what would norm -- how many acres of commercial would normally be the maximum allowed in that southeast corner? Is that -- MR. MILK: Forty acres. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Forty acres. And this is 24; right? Plus the 6 that's already there is 30. MR. MILK: It'd be a maximum of 30. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. So it's actually ten less than what's allowed by our current regulations? MR. MILK: That's correct. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Other questions? Commissioner Hancock. MR. LONG: I have a question. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: No, sir, not now. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Not yet, sir. We've not opened it to the public yet. MR. LONG: Pardon? CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: We've not opened discussion to the public yet. MR. LONG: All right. MR. MILK: I think ultimately if -- if you want to look at the whole picture is commercial zoning existing at future Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road could be developed as is, as could be the six acres existing at the intersection of Airport and Vanderbilt. And the petitioner could come back in and ask for another amendment to the master plan for some more commercial. So there is a potential for additional commercial if, in fact, things were left the same in the future. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Any other questions? Com -- Commissioner Hancock. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: You mentioned some discussion of a wall and buffering. What buffering currently exists between the proposed commercial area and the existing residential? MR. MILK: There's currently a berm there that would probably above the street grade be 6 to -- 5 to 6 feet in heighth with A some various bushes that -- really opacity is 100 percent at street level, looking level. Once you are on top of that particular berm, it it probably drops 10 to 12 feet because that area has not been filled yet. So it's a fairly substantial, what I would call opaque buffer at max probably six feet above the existing driveway access road there. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: So it generally exceeds what a typical wall around a community does? MR. MILK: For -- for the Piper's Grove -- COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: It looks like it does. MR. MILK: -- project I'd say that particular buffer adjacent to, quote, the residential parcel that is there today exceeds the Land Development Code standards for buffering on their property only. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Okay. That's all I have for now. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Commissioner Constantine? COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Couple of things. First, I received two, three letters from individuals living near the area, and I told them I would include that as part of the record today. So my administrative aide will put those on, and that expressed some of the concerns that were outlined by Mr. Milk. If this were -- Commissioner Norris asked about the future activity center. With that in consideration, this then, if the change takes place, becomes consistent. They were exempt when -- when this -- when -- when the county initially created this. MR. MILK: That's correct. Back in about 1991 they were they were found exempt from the zoning reevaluation process because, in fact, they were a DRI and consistent with policy 5.1 of the future land use element. So they maintained their commercial zoning through that process. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: This -- so if -- if the switch were not made, if the 24 acres were kept as residential, are there any limitations on what can go in there? What's allowed in that 24 acres? MR. MILK: At the corner of Airport and Vanderbilt Beach Road, that is a residentially designated land use parcel. It could be a combination of single-family and multi-family dwelling units. Multi-family could, in fact, be 100 feet in heighth; single-family, 35 feet. It depends if it was aggregated amongst multi-family and single-family. But today it's -- it's residentially zoned. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: So depending on the scenario, that 24 acres could have a sprinkling of single-family homes which probably wouldn't be offensive, or it -- at the other extreme -- not likely but at the other extreme you could have hundred-foot high multi-family? MR. MILK: Could have a -- COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Which obviously -- MR. MILK: -- multi-family unit at 100 feet, correct. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: And somewhere in between something. MR. MILK: Right. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: And I'm sorry. What was the height for commercial? If this is to be granted, what is the maximum height of commercial on the property? MR. MILK: The commercial heighth varies depending on the use. If the use is an office use, the building heighth is a L 8A hundred feet. If it's a commercial-related use such as a shopping center, there's a maximum height of 45 feet. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: I'm going to have a couple more questions, but I'll wait until we've heard -- COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Likewise. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: -- from the petitioner and the public. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. Are we finished asking Mr. Milk questions for this time? Mr. Saadeh, petitioner? MR. SAADEH: Good afternoon, commissioners and Madam Chairman. For the record, my name's Michael Saadeh. I'm representing the Vineyards Development Corporation. I 'd just like to touch very briefly on a couple of points, and then I would like permission to come back in rebuttal on some of the points that the adjoin -- that the adjoining homeowners would bring up. The biggest thing just from a county perspective not just on a -- on a small scale but from a county perspective, we have vested zoning on a 25 -- on a 24-acre piece of property on the corner of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. That's already vested, so there's no quarrel on that property, what can and cannot be done to it. Pri -- prior to the county adopting a Land Development Code ordinance and prior to the county adopting an activity center ordinance, the Vineyards PUD was formed, and that was -- that dates back to -- the development order dates back to 1985. Subsequent to that the development order -- the LDC came up, and they identified some corners of activity centers. And to my knowledge it have not been contested in any location where they had an activity center that the zoning was not granted for commercial use. So technically what we're saying is the corner of Airport Road and -- and Vanderbilt Beach Road which is the property in question today under your current zoning and ordinance is not -- not just that are limited to Collier County but that are endorsed by the region, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and also that are endorsed by the department -- Department of Community Affairs. This property can be -- up to 40 acres of that corner can be zoned commercial with multitude of uses and be consistent with every ordinance you have today. So basically just from a global perspective what we're doing right now is giving up -- technically giving up 24 acres of vested use to shift it to a location where we could have 24 more acres of vested use. So swapping 24 acres, what -- physically what we're doing is giving up 24 acres, I mean, of commercial property. We're not getting any densities for it. We're not getting any more units for it, residential or otherwise. There is no add benefit whatsoever. And the only reason we're doing it because of -- staff had asked the last time we amended the PUD that this be done. At the time we didn't feel the timing was right. Now we're looking at it from a business standpoint. One is to satisfy the agency, but two, also we don't have to speculate on, you know, what the activity would bring in three, four, five years from now on that commercial property. So we felt we'll be consistent and will comply with your regulations. And as Bryan mentioned, the DCA endorses the project and 8A -- and actually supports it. South Florida Regional Planning Council supported the project. Your own planning commission unanimously voted for the project. And that's basically what -- you know, in a nutshell what we're trying to do. The property was never ever in a deception form to where we hid from any adjacent -- adjacent homeowners our intentions. From the inception we had notified the developer of Piper's Grove that this property will be commercial at a later date. We didn't tell him we're going to swap commercial for it. We said this will be commercial. We carved out that much property and took it off the market because we knew we were going to develop it as commercial in the future. The exhibits I passed out to you is exhibits that I have on the wall for whoever want to see them from the general public show that the brochures that the homeowners bought under -- these brochures reflect that that property will be commercial property. To go further, to have access -- COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: These -- these brochures were distributed by you? MR. SAADEH: No, no. These brochures were distributed by the people who developed Piper's Grove. As a matter of fact, I picked them up from their sales center. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: This is what you're talking about? MR. SAADEH: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: And it -- MR. SAADEH: This and the other piece. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: And it says future shopping center on it. MR. SAADEH: Yes, ma'am. And it doesn't just reflect corner six acres that's already been there and vested there. It reflects the entire parcel. Otherwise it wouldn't have said future shopping center on the whole parcel. So, I mean, the developer was in a planning commission, and he -- he -- he could be here today. I haven't seen him. But they're not -- he's not in -- he's not arguing or -- or dis -- disagreeing with the fact that the property from the inception was intended to be commercial property because we sold him the land in 19 -- in '91, '92 is when we were negotiating on the property. And at that point we knew that eventually we're going to do a commercial shopping center there. Further, one access of the property that's along Airport Road is the main entrance, the -- the existing main entrance today for the community Piper's Grove. That property is Old Grove's Road. We -- the Vineyards Development Corporation have constructed that entrance to the point of the entrance to the shopping center, pays still today from -- since 1992 till now every quarter we pay our pro rata share like I don't remember the exact percentage, either one half or one-third, up to the maintenance for that boulevard. And the only reason we've been maintaining it for two or three or four years, because we knew one day we want to go ahead and use it for access to our shopping center. The main inception from -- from the inception the Piper's Grove entrance, they have a gatehouse. The gatehouse was purposely located beyond the -- the turn to the shopping center because we wanted to keep that piece of that road public versus vacated private. L 8A Now, from their gatehouse into the community this -- these roadways that they have are all private roadways. But we went through a tremendous expense, several hundred thousand dollars, to build that roadway to standards and -- and keep it open and landscape it and -also contribute to the maintenance of it again to give us an extra access to our shopping center. So the intent from the inception was not that, you know, nobody knew that was going to be a shopping center and -- and now all of a sudden somebody knows. That was not the intent. Just secondly from a privacy standpoint, there is an existing buffer right now. I passed some pictures so you can see what the buffer is. And from the buffer then there is the roadway, and then from the roadway there is parking spaces and then the buildings. And if you look at the orientation of the buildings on the -- on the map I showed you, specifically buildings A, B, C, and D which are the ones that will more or less be affected the most, the orientation as far as the views and the amenities and the balconies or any certain areas and whatever are facing the other direction. The minimum distance from the property line to the edge of those buildings is -- as we measured was 110 feet. And on the south side of the property, the minimum distance from that to the closest building is 140 feet. On top of that, as -- as in the PUD, it's engraved in the PUD that if you have different uses, adjacent uses, there's a minimum of 50-foot setback between the property line and the nearest structure we can build. So you take the 110 or 140 consecutively and you take a minimum of another 50 feet for separation between buildings, so now you're talking close to 160 to 200 feet apart, not to mention also there's another provision that even over and above the existing berm that's out there, there's a requirement in the PUD that if the adjacent -- if the adjoining properties are of -- of different use, then the existing buffer cannot be utilized by both sides. What I mean by that is the existing buffer today cannot be claimed by our future activities. They are to say that this is a buffer existing so therefore we don't have to do another buffer. By ordinance by what's written in the PUD, we're obliged to another 25-foot-wide landscape buffer. And that might comprise of a fence at the time. That might comprise of a wall, pure landscaping, whatever it deems appropriate at the time. The reason we don't want to pin it down today, because we are horizontal developers. We develop real estate, and we don't do vertical construction. And the more stipulations we put on this piece of property, the harder it becomes to sell it. We have no intentions of developing it ourselves. We're not in that business. And one day that property's going to sell. Could be next week. Could be next year. Could be in ten years, I mean, depending on the market. And then the new -- whoever is going to do the vertical developer (sic) , he is going to do the 25-foot buffers, he's going to do the 50-foot setbacks. Water retention, he might decide to put the water retention against that property. I mean, it's very hard to speculate and get into further conceptual plans on this subject or the other. So basically -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: But no matter what, there's going to be 25 feet of additional buffer. MR. SAADEH: Additional buffer over and above what's -- what's there today. So technically, you know, from a -- from our 8A standpoint we feel we've complied with everything the agencies wanted. We've given up vested zoning that we can never, ever come back and get for any reason. We're not gaining one inch of square feet more, and we're not gaining one inch of one more unit, you know. And that's basically what -- what the case is, and I'd like to answer any questions you may have. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Commissioner Constantine. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: I had a -- excuse me. I had a conversation in this room, as a matter of fact, a short time ago with one of the residents of Piper's Grove who indicated they had spoken with you and you had indicated the -- if this were approved that they could expect the shopping center development to be consistent with the quality of development at Crossroads where Publix and the Vineyards -- the other entrance to Vineyards. MR. SAADEH: The property -- any property that Vineyards Development sold under the Vineyards PUD is subject to architecture review board and review. So the same premise that the Crossroads market was subjected to architecture review board from the standpoint of color, materials, roof pitch, roof design, roof materials, and so forth, the same requirements will apply on this property whether it's inside the Vineyards as we know it or whether it's on Airport Road. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Does that -- MR. SAADEH: So that's a commitment, and -- and we will have deed restrictions that go with the property that -- we will review all that. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Does that architectural review include landscaping, et cetera? MR. SAADEH: Absolutely, yes, sir. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: So if -- if someone is standing on Vineyards Boulevard looking across the little lake there at the back side of Publix, the Crossroads market, and sees the trees, the shrubbery as well as the physical building architectural requirements, they can expect that to be consistent with what they would find if this were approved. MR. SAADEH: Yeah. I mean, I don't -- I don't exactly follow your question. I would say that it is subject to architecture review board, and we've -- we've been in this county for over 35 years. We have not done anything shabby as far as our interest in development or our forming interest. So, I mean, we have no intention of just selling the property to someone and just letting it go. Every -- every intention we have is to do a quality property. And along that street, every community we sold along that street I think speaks for itself. Now, if you ask me to put a monetary value of what the landscaping will be and so the forth, I -- COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: No, I'm just asking that there's a commitment that it will be -- MR. SAADEH: It will be a quality shopping center, yes. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Architecturally -- architectural speaking it will be consistent with the Crossroads and -- MR. SAADEH: Most likely, to be honest with you -- and again, I'm not in the business. I'm strictly speculating. Most likely it will end up being -- the uses there, I mean, lend themselves to identical what we have at Crossroads, Publix, Walgreens, and so forth. So these guys, I mean, they have their own standards of things, and it's an upscale area. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: But I just need you to say on 8A the record that they will be subject to the same architectural review that the Crossroads people underwent. MR. SAADEH: Yes. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Thank you. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Other questions? MR. DORRILL: You -- you do have one speaker. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Hancock. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: I wanted to ask about two specific things. And Commissioner Constantine already hit on one. Obviously when you're put -- when you have residential behind a shopping center, if you go to the city of Naples and you see what they didn't do -- they didn't do the architectural finishing on the rear of it -- you can create something very ugly. So what I believe I heard is that architectural controls include rear finishing of -- of the building and -- MR. SAADEH: He's asking if it's consistent with Crossroads market. And if you look there, you know, technically, I mean, let's be realistic about it, folks. The back of any building is never going to look as appealing -- COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Right. MR. SAADEH: -- as the front. That's why they call it front elevation. It looks nice. On the back it always doesn't have the same touch. So, you know, people don't seem to spend the same kind of money on the back, but it will be consistent with what was done in the Vineyards, and, I mean, I don't have any problem committing to that. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: The second thing is that I was in Berkshire at one point, and after they built the Publix, the air conditioning noise was -- was running right into a -- a -- a residential area. And they did not buffer it and attenuate it, you know, from the handlers on the top of the -- the building. I guess I -- I would just like to ask that for the record that that will be addressed by the -- the developer, that they will at least shield and attenuate the sound from -- from the roof to move it forward, to keep it from going back, you know, as best as is practical. MR. SAADEH: You're asking me to speculate. I -- I don't -- I'm not really a vertical developer. I don't know the mechanics or the logistics of how the air conditioning gets placed and how -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: But can I say we have a noise ordinance and if -- COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: No. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And if we have that mechanism in place that if they violate the noise ordinance, whoever eventually develops this site, then, you know, we can send somebody out there to force them to stop. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: That's true. MR. SAADEH: I'm sure that the quality people we -- we deal with in our business -- and -- and believe me, we don't sell to everybody who just walks in the door. We try to weed out the people we do business with. I'm sure that whoever's going to develop this property at a later date, it's going to be very advisable on their part -- I mean, I would recommend it. I can't force them to do it, but I can recommend very heavily to meet with the homeowners and have some feel of what they are looking for and try to fit it in their 8A design. A lot of times the issues that come up can really truly be addressed in the design. It's difficult in my stand -- from my standpoint to address them today because I'm strictly speculating. I'm not going to develop the site. If I was to develop the site and I'm telling you here today that I will do that, then I would have my planner here, my architect here and tell you, okay, tell them what you like, and then work through these parameters. But I don't get into that side of the business. So we want to try to get a quality developer. We definitely want to make them subject to architecture review board requirements. They have ordinances built in in our part and in the overall ordinance about setback requirements, buffering requirements, and so forth. So I have no doubt something good's gonna come out of it. It's just I'm not gonna be the guy doing it, and anything I would tell you about specifics how it's going to come out, I'm strictly speculating, and that's what I want to try to avoid to do today. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Commissioner Norris. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Mr. Milk, in any case when this property is ultimately built whether it's next year, ten years from now, does it have to come back before the board? Will there be some board approval at that time? MR. MILK: It would depend on what would ultimately happen at that particular site. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Most likely the answer is it would probably be some -- MR. MILK: It would have to be platted. That 24 acres right now -- COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Uh-huh. MR. MILK: -- is unplatted. It would have to be platted. That would come before the board. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Well, I'm just getting to the point that it seems to me that a lot of these little questions like that are impossible to answer right now -- MR. MILK: It is. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: -- and that they would be more -- more appropriately addressed to whoever ends up developing the property at some time in the future. If we want to talk to them at that point about -- say, you know, we have some concerns about air conditioning noise; why don't you -- you know, would you agree to do some shielding or something of that, I mean, wouldn't that be the better time? MR. MILK: What's likely to happen is the developer will go through a preliminary subdivision plat which will go to the planning commission which at that point they'll have to have infrastructure easements, road rights of ways, out parcels, buffering, water management. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: You've -- you've answered my question. If it's gonna -- if the plat's gonna have to come before the board, I can address it at that point and make sure it's not missed. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Wait a minute. That's -- CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: I don't think it comes back to us. MR. DORRILL: And then there are two additional levels they're gonna have, as Commissioner Hancock realizes: Both a preliminary and a final site development plan that have to be approved 8A before they can ever even file for a building permit. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Is that approved by us or approved by the planning commission? MR. DORRILL: Those -- those are administrative issues, but the staff is going to apply whatever your adopted Land Development Code and subdivision regulation criteria are. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: At that time. MR. DORRILL: As we would any vertical developer contractor in the county. MR. MILK: In other words, in that 25-foot buffer, there would be landscaping. There would be trees placed every 25 linear feet. There would be a six-foot opaque buffer, whether it was landscape berm, combination of a fence, berm. That would all be in place at the time -- CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. MR. MILK: -- of the site development plan review. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: But that's -- that's according to our regulations today. MR. MILK: That's correct. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: And they may be more stringent or less stringent whenever the site development plan -- MR. MILK: That could be. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: -- is done. MR. MILK: That's correct. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. We have some public speakers. MR. DORRILL: We have one. Gervase Audette. Mr. or Miss Audette. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Mr. Saadeh, you reserved the right to speak when the public speakers are -- are finished? MR. SAADEH: Yes, ma'am. Thank you. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And if I could ask Mr. Weigel, this -- this gentleman who wanted to talk before, would you be sure that he knows what the process is? MR. WEIGEL: Sure will. MR. DORRILL: Mr. Audette, go ahead. MR. AUDETTE: Commissioners, my name is Gervase Audette. I'm a full-time resident, North Groves, Piper's Groves. I'm a director there trying to represent the owners. But Clam Pass took the whole audience up this morning, and I don't know where they're at at this time. We had a full house when we went before the grand jury on the 19th of October. I'm saying the grand jury because they listened to us and felt that they should send it on to the jury. I'm going to call you the jury because whatever decision you make today -- and Commissioner Tim, he's going to be the foreman of the jury -- is going to affect us for the rest of our lives as long as we're living there. And Mr. Saadeh, the -- I believe that he's a -- he's a man of his word. We had quite a discussion. I also looked at all the planning that -- what they can build in there. I called the county twice from out of state, what was -- and I was never told two years ago that was still residential. I was told when I made the two long distance phone calls that was commercial. So I'm -- I mean, I 'm not going to fight that. But what I'm fighting, I'm 107 feet and so is the other residents A, B, C, D buildings from the property line. It states in there that they can build ten feet from the property line. Someone here's saying 25-foot BA berm. But it also states that they can build up to ten feet from that property line. Now, there was a retention pond there. A retention pond disappeared within the past year. Now, that retention pond pushed the distance further away. Now, there are people on the second floor that looks out at that property. We got windows that look out -- we look both ways out of our units. Granted, we got a garage door. But I got windows. The second story got windows. We look right out on that property. And what I would like to do if we can't win this one is a good setback, a good berm. I'm not looking at a chainlink fence. I want beauty because we got beauty there right now, and I want to retain that beauty and so do the other owners. So if we can get a good setback with a nice big berm, I can look out my -- my door on my -- look right out, and I see right of a building if there's a building right there. If we can get a good setback, a good berm, and a good -- lot of trees -- and the gentleman here said that he'd do it like the Crossroads. Well, I went over and looked at the Crossroads. They did a beautiful job. But let me tell you, I'm 107 feet from the property line. The Crossroads gotta be more than 500 feet. The first building behind the Crossroads is five -- exceeds 500 feet. You can't see the buildings behind it, and you can't see the Crossroads from the buildings. They did a beautiful job. So I can see where there would be no complaints coming from the Crossroads. I wouldn't even have any complaints if ours -- if we could end up like that. But what I like to see is a rider, an amendment to this, whoever buys it because I -- I sat in the planning commission here the other day when somebody wasn't supposed to build less than 15 feet but they did. Oh, it's too late, but you're within seven feet. We're going to approve it. So this is what we don't want to run into down the line. We want to make sure that whoever buys this has all the rules, regulations in front of them because this is our domain. This is our happiness. And whatever you, the jury, decide today is going to have an impact on our lives. And I -- I would like to see an amendment to that that said yes, you're going to have a 200-foot easement here, setback, put the pond back in there and a good berm and a lot of trees. But I'd like to be involved in -- in your future decisions on this so we know what's going on. And I -- and I think this gentleman right here, Mr. Saadeh, is -- he's concerned about us. He -- when he made this -- he said, we'll make it look like the Crossroads, fine. But I would like to see that as amendment in there. Whoever buys it, it's, well, I didn't buy it with those intentions. I -- I'm going to live with this ten-foot setback. I got a loading dock behind my house, you know. These are my concerns. This is everybody else that's in that -- that condominium association up there. We're all concerned about what we got for the rest of our lives, noise. Crime, I can settle that with my .38 if they come on my property but -- CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: The petitioner has said that whoever buys this property to develop it will be subject to the same architectural review that everyone in the -- in the Vineyards DRI is. MR. AUDETTE: But that's -- but that's not in your documents. If you read them 14 pages of documents, what can be built A there and what the setbacks -- if you build a hundred-foot high hotel or office building, I think you gotta be seventy-five feet from the property line. It depends what you build there what distance you gotta be from the set -- from the property line. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. MR. AUDETTE: So these -- they can say, well, you said I can build ten feet from in there, and you can based on that planning commission document. MR. MILK: The setback ultimately is 50 feet. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Fifty feet? MR. MILK: For hundred-foot buildings, forty-foot buildings, two-story buildings. It's a minimum of 50 on the entire parcel. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: From the property line or from this road? MR. MILK: From the property line of Piper's Grove, that's correct. MR. AUDETTE: See, that still isn't very much, but, like I said, I rest my case. I hope you make a good sound decision that's going to affect us, and I think the gentleman here we can work with, but I'd like to see amendment in there that there's no surprises down the road. And like he said, if he sells it, you know, he walks away, and it's our problem yet. Thank you very much. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Thank you. MR. DORRILL: That gentleman was your only registered speaker. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: We may have another one registering. MR. DORRILL: Okay. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Just to clarify, the last Le point you said there, if they sell it they're out -- or you walk away. Mr. Saadeh, if you sell that to a developer, if you sell that property to a developer, again to reiterate, they are still required to follow the architectural standards of the Vineyards -- MR. SAADEH: Yes. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: -- development PUD. Thank you. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: That -- that's not -- the gentleman said that's not in today's documents, but I assume that the reason that that's not in today's documents are that it will be in the sales contract. MR. SAADEH: I think the gentleman is mistaken. It is in today's document. The PUD specifically states -- I don't remember what page, but Bryan can help me out here. The PUD specifically states different uses on adjacent properties have to have a minimum setback of 50 feet. That's set in stone. I can't change it any more than you people can today. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Excuse me. I was referring to the architectural review. MR. SAADEH: Oh, the architecture review board is something that cannot be in this document. This is a zoning document. And what -- what that is is a restriction, a stipulation, that we give up as deed restriction with the property. You can't incorporate deed restrictions on -- on zoning documents. I mean, it's two different issues. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: And that's what I said. MR. SAADEH: Yes. 8q COMMISSIONER NORRIS: It's not in today's documents that Mr. Milk has here because it will be in the future sales document when that happens; is -- MR. SAADEH: Just a -- COMMISSIONER NORRIS: -- that correct? Am I correct? MR. MILK: That's correct. And -- and what further strengthens that is this is a development order DRI, and that parcel will always be part of the Vineyards. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. MR. MILK: Whether Mr. Vicagi (phonetic) owns it per se or not, it's still a Vineyards development order. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. MR. SAADEH: The -- the point I want to just hammer on that real quick is 50 feet stays as a minimum setback. That's the bare minimum. It doesn't mean that you can't go more, but that's the least you have to go. And the 25-foot landscape buffer, those are part of the document today. That's as far as the extent of what the zoning document can carry this. Anything beyond that can be in -- in the form of a deed restriction, and we did mention that the architecture review board will apply on this property. That's basically what I have. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. Let me ask Mr. Milk one other question that I think might be somewhat pertinent to this discussion. If this is developed in the future as a little shopping area, would you say it would be more common, more appropriate to have the water management system in the rear of the buildings rather than in the front where the parking is? MR. MILK: Typically historically that's where it used to be. And -- and depending on the thrust of out parcels and who the developer may be, what's -- historically it's always been in the rear of the building. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Okay. Thank you. MR. MILK: Because of the loading zone and -- COMMISSIONER NORRIS: And -- and that would work to the benefit of these residents if -- if that -- MR. MILK: It very well could be, yes. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: -- were the case in this one. Okay. But we'll never -- I mean, we're not going to know that today. We're going to know that at some point in the future when this -- MR. MILK: And that would be at the time of the preliminary subdivision plat and the plat process. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Once McDonald's stops paying for out parcels, you can bet on the water management being in the back. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Do we have another speaker, Mr. Dorrill? MR. DORRILL: We -- we do. In fact, Mr. Long, your turn, sir. Good afternoon. MR. LONG: Good afternoon. I would like to speak with regarding to the rezoning at Vanderbilt -- not at Van -- at Vanderbilt Beach Extension and Livingston Road. Now, that is now residential, and it's residential from down at Piper's Grove all the way up almost to the Vineyards. Now, I'd like to know the reasoning on wanting to have that rezoned to commercial. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Are we talking about the same piece of property? COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Sir, that's not all residential. A MR. LONG: Tell me where there's commercial. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Sir, if you'd look at this map over here, to your left, sir -- MR. LONG: Well, my -- COMMISSIONER NORRIS: See this map? MR. LONG: My eyes aren't too good. MR. DORRILL: Which one of the two projects do you live in? MR. LONG: Village Walk. MR. SAADEH: This is Village Walk. MR. LONG: And it would make this commercial. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Just the opposite, sir. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Just the opposite. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: That is planned for commercial. The request today makes that residential. MR. DORRILL: This would become residential. He's moving his commercial down to Airport Road. MR. LONG: Oh, all right. Then I -- I misunder -- understood what's going on. So that's going to be residential. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Yes. MR. LONG: Okay. Fine. Thank you very much. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: If we approve this change. MR. LONG: Thank you very much. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: If it gets approved. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Two sides to every coin I'm afraid. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Are there further questions? Do we have other speakers, Mr. Dorrill? COMMISSIONER NORRIS: No. CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: I will close the public hearing. Do we have further questions for Mr. Milk or Mr. Saadeh? If not, is there a motion? COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Madam Chairman, I'm -- I'm fairly satisfied with the fact that the -- the constraints within the Vineyards PUD, very similar to what we have in other PUDs such as Pelican Bay and so forth that provide for a very consistent level of architectural review and what has been in the past a good end product with the deed restrictions resulting from that, the minimum 50-foot setback we're talking about here, I'm comfortable recommending approval of petition PUD 84-30(5) . CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Subject to whatever stipulations may -- may be included in it? COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: Correct, as -- as recommended. MS. STUDENT: Madam Chairman, I just want to remind the board there need to be three motions, and you should probably vote on the substantial, insubstantial first -- CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: First? MS. STUDENT: -- and then the PUD and DRI. Thank you. COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: I'll -- CHAIRPERSON MATTHEWS: Okay. Well, let's -- COMMISSIONER HANCOCK: I'll withdraw my motion. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Table it. Item #12C4 RESOLUTION 95-636 DETERMINING THAT REVISIONS TO THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION REQUIRING 8A DATE 41 , f , 1992_ PRE-APPLIC. r / SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRE-APPLICATION MEETING PROJECT NAME r1 pets V '0e•- LOCATION APPLICANT'S NAME :54%/l A A-I(A-c PHONE T ATTENDANCE & I115 �c�lnd 047t 0e-SQ w'StLI �� 1L�`� t� w,4.c_ o.S 04 1.4e, ice r V 6, Lrv.' /7/1/.:7z. PROJECT IS: MINOR MAJOR MAJOR PHASED -T PROJECT IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.L.U.E. OF GM? 6,S G-NERAL ETING NOTgS: r -,f, ! 3. U ■ S .w • :c�eS 'i e . �� T eci I ► 'mss _( • • •. L:. • 11.-..lin! ► G _ ��:/iTi: _ - A) ti,[ . - S p,+'A, ,_ 4. N'. _ _ 1.)u ,RIRMVIIMIEMOOM♦ Y. Li • • e at A. e .C- A - ,' . /LA'.-- - La r ADD TIONAL ITEMS N EDED: s ,fes be Stcl7 ai o :. -file_ (5 a IN r la, G,-377 a. NO. OF SDP COPIES TO SUBMIT: ADDITIONAL STAFF DISTRIBUTION TO: SDP PRE-APP MEETING FORM and EXHIBIT 8A DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING SERVICES SECTION MEMORANDUM TO: Bryan Milk Project Planner FROM: Raymond V. BellowsJ1 Project Planner DATE: June 26, 1992 RE: PSP-92-06 "Pipers Grove Subdivision" Transportation Planning Review INTRODUCTION: The subject plat contains 61.38± acres and is located in the southeast corner of Airport-Pulling Road (CR-31) and Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR-862) in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. The Petitioner has requested a Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval for 388 residential lots. The site is located within the Vineyards POD Zoning District. TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request and has determined that the project will generate approximately 2,013 AWDTE. The site generated traffic will not exceed the Significance Test volume (5 percent of the Level of Service "C" capacity) of Airport-Pulling Road within the project's radius of development influence (RDI) . It should be noted that the process of subdivision will not increase the overall development intensity or add additional trips that was established at the time the PUD was approved and amended. The TIS for this project was reviewed during the time of rezoning and the comments made at that time are still valid. The Traffic Circulation Element classifies CR-31 as a 4 lane arterial road within the projects RDI. The current traffic count is 24,942 AADT which results in LOS "A" operation. CR-862 is a 2 lane collector and has a traffic count of 6,092 AADT. The Collier County LOS Tables indicate that this segment is operating at LOS "C" . -1- $ EXHIBIT V $ A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: Staff has reviewed the layout of the proposed Preliminary Subdivision plat from a planning and traffic safety standpoint and finds the following. In view of the adequate depth and sight distance of the entrance road off of Airport-Pulling Road, ttt� the proposed subdivision traffic circulation _ system should operate adequately and with an acceptable level of safe-.y. h addition, the subdivision site plan provides an interconnection t to_ the_adjacent tract to the east. This is consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan. The projects roadway geometric design is subject to any required engineering modifications. The Traffic Accident Report for 1990 shows the intersection of Bonita Beach Road and the project entrance as having a low 1 (under 9 per year) traffic accident rate. Therefore, no additional intersection improvements are required as a result of this project. 1 CONCLUSION: # The trips generated by this proposed project will not exceed 5 percent of the LOS "C" volume and will not lower the LOS below the adopted capacity standards on Airport-Pulling Road within the RDI. Therefore, the petitioner's preliminary subdivision request will not create or excessively increase traffic { congestion on the external roadway network and complies with the Growth Management Plan. RVB/rb 3 r 1 1 1k -2- 8A • • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION SMP-90-28, JAMES B. ROBERTS, OF ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. , REPRESENTING THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND U.S. HOME CORPORATION, REQUESTING SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR "STONEYBROOX ESTATES" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE VINEYARDS PUD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) , ON THE EAST BY LIVINGSTON ROAD EXTENSION, IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 23 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, PLORIDA, CONTAINING 196.69 ACRES. OBJECTIVE? To obtain Subdivision Master Plan approval for a mixed use Planned Unit Development. CO1cSIDERATTOjt: The petitioner is proposing to subdivide a 196.69 acre tract into 275 single-family home sites, two multi-family tracts and a 5.91 acre commercial tract. Presently existing land uses and zoning are as follows: Existing: Currently the 196.69 acre tract is zoned PUD, is undeveloped, and historically was an agricultural • field. The site is void of natural • vegetation. 9 Surrounding: North - Vanderbilt Beach Road, and A-2 zoning. East - Livingston Road, and Vineyards PUD zoning. South - Semi-developed Citrus Gardens PUD zoning, and A-2 zoning. West - Airport-Pulling Road and A-2 zoning. The subject property is located within the "Urban Residential« area on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property, 196.69 acres, is part of the Vineyards 1,925.4 acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Development of Regional Impact (DRI) significance. The Vineyards PUD is approved for a maximum of 3,071 single-family units, 3,907 multi-family units and 71.1 acres of commercial zoning. The overall gross density is 3.62 units per acre. By method of fractionalization, the density granted for the subject property was 320 single-family units and 430 multi-family units or 3.8 units per •-. ss acre. The bar' density permitted within the "Urban Residential" area is 4 units per gross acre; therefore, this subdiv - 4 • consistent., with the Future Land Use Element of t e 064-in t � ' it t'4 ' *>. V. y �►r1�.r__ . ., !�...... - � EXHIBIT :. ;t yj, ? . •:`rt ?41111111111. • _ - a -'. ",.-. t.,..,,.-41.204101004:0~1, : ,i . Management Plan. The subject property also contains 5.91 A • acres of commercial property. Due to the vested status of the Vineyards PUD/DRI, the amount of commercial property within this project is deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Based upon the above analysis, and given that no review agencies have identified any inconsistencies with the Growth Management Plan, staff has determined this petition to be consistent with the Plan. — Staff and all appropriate County agencies have reviewed this petition and had no objection to its approval, subject to the stipulations listed on the agreement sheet Exhibit "B", attached to the Staff Report dated August 7, 1990. .,Kt The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held their •c-;3: a , public hearing October 4, 1990, and forwarded Petition `it ,'cj!", SMP-90-28 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval (Vote: 7-0) subject to all of ,,}',,- ' ' staff's stipulations. , it, 7IBCAL IMPACTt None �� T" QROWTE MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The density and land uses that will result from the proposed development are consistent with the Future Land Use Element and Growth Management Plan. ``1- • Responses from all other reviewing agencies have not �• ', identified any conflicts and, therefore, this petition is . determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. ____.L.14P 7LANNING co)Qsi$IIION RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County ' ° Board of County Commissioners approve Petition BMP-90-28 as conditionally approved by the Collier County Planning , Commission, subject to the conditions listed in the Agreement 1 Sheet. PREPARED BYt . ( '')l',Yr'„V\ \A, 7;.,(,! ` IC'- 5 BRYAN MILK DATE PROJECT`,PLANNER REVIEWED B : - .4442- ___ ,, , Nffw . BAGI SKI DATE . PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER y • • • 4na;--,..--zz---/(f•-' Lr.,(40 /61/0-/ye ,.t. , , , ,•: 1 W. BRUTT, AICP him .• �+,` ' .'.- • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR Acle .' ��•` + .SUMMARY/PLANNING/10/000063 `L, s r v: c ;:1j :i::t!c i' H •-• • ' , , col: rM r M^f 8A . EXECUTIVE SUIO(AR' PETITION SMP-90-28, JAMES B. ROBERTS, OF ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. , REPRESENTING THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND U.S. HOME CORPORATION, REQUESTING SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR "STONEYBROOK ESTATES" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE VINEYARDS PUD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (C.R. 31) , ON THE EAST BY LIVINGSTON ROAD EXTENSION, IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 49 - - , SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 196.69 ACRES. OBJECTIVE! To obtain Subdivision Master Plan approval for a mixed use Planned Unit Development. COEBIDERATT0N$s The petitioner is proposing to subdivide a 196.69 acre tract into 275 single-family home sites, two multi-family tracts and a 5.91 acre commercial tract. Presently existing land uses and zoning are as follows: Existing: Currently the 196.69 acre tract is zoned PUD, is undeveloped, and historically was an agricultural • field. The site is void of natural vegetation. Surrounding: North - Vanderbilt Beach Road, and A-2 zoning. East - Livingston Road, and Vineyards PUD zoning. South Semi-developed Citrus Gardens PUD zoning, and A-2 zoning. West - Airport-Pulling Road and A-2 zoning. The subject property is located within the "Urban Residential" area on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property, 196.69 acres, is part of the Vineyards 1,925.4 acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Development of Regional Impact (DRI) significance. The Vineyards PUD is approved for a maximum of 3,071 single-family units, 3,907 multi-family units and 71.1 acres of commercial zoning. The overall gross density is 3.62 units per acre. By method of fractionalization, the density granted for the subject property was 320 single-family units and 430 - multi-family units or 3.8 units per r--',ss acre. The bares density permitted within the "Urban Residential" area is 4 units per gross acre; therefore, this subdiv .. 4• , 4111 crnsssistant: with the ,future Land Use Element of t e Na . , mss. ! ' t. 'A 4 ♦ 4. y i 1 -, • , ," . - 0035' • . .i¢ ,.•,'. . - f.. EXHIBIT -,-rd t *? .+ ,'".n1 rl'<L `a na. PII `. Management Plan. The subject property also contains 5.91 • acres of commercial property. Due to the vested status of the Vineyards PUD/DRI, the amount of commercial property within this project is deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Based upon the above analysis, and given that no review agencies have identified any inconsistencies with the Growth Management Plan, staff has determined this petition to be consistent with the Plan. -- Staff and all appropriate County agencies have reviewed this petition and had no objection to its approval, subject to the stipulations listed on the agreement sheet Exhibit "B", attached to the Staff Report dated August 7, 1990. ,a. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held their 4,`,',' public hearingOctober 4, 1990, and forwarded Petition '.v' ti SMP-90-28 to the Board of County Commissioners with a ' '`'' recommendation for approval (Vote: 7-0) subject to all of `")'d1'•',; staff's stipulations. iw' ; 'at. • . . ;T:. 7ISCAL IMPACT: Nona }t,;•`.i:o.", 9ROWTa MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The density and land uses that will result from the proposed development are consistent with the Future Land Use Element and Growth Management Plan. .``. '•, • Responses from all other reviewing agencies have not " �{• y', identified any conflicts and, therefore, this petition is , determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 4 _........_ praxmina coxxssaso RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approve Petition SHP-90-28 as conditionally approved by the Collier County Planning Commission, subject to the conditions listed in the Agreement Sheet. PREPARED BY; r, l ), '/ ,\ \' 1,-:� a �'- c 4` BRYAN MILK DATE PROJECT .PLANNER REVIEWED B : . ..i<ifi• . ,) - 4 .442_ , N . BAGI SKI DATE . PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER Gj o 0 ',:: • N. BRUTT, AICP DATE t,., • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR IGEN. �►J ! 's. 4" �;� ., .-'• i1 • SUMMARY/PLANNING/10/000M N..�, *.' 'R'' t r. I. ,4,- tis s- ' sia±. , ir`f. •j, •••2• �' t '., � ; ..: ..m, ` Z' -' kf• .•, ,J� ►`N .1' .. 4..., T ` •-,,. e 4 •,J• .:1".r'• . r Y- " ffi._11 'a ,.t - ri 7y'��, f �s �•. Aub.'. r: y 1 ' f ! ' 1"-1, r ,r.......... _._, __,..:,............. .................„..t...„..„ , ,, . , ,.. AGENDA ITEM 3-J 8 A 0 MEMORANDUM TOs COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COM UNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DATE: AUGUST 7, 1990 RBI PFTTTION No; 5Mp�-9O- 0i axON Y OOK ESTATES AT THE VINEYARbi -} i I. . \ • AGENT/APPLICANT: \ ` Agent: Jamas, B.. Roberts Anchor Engineering Consultants, Inc. 790.H ibour 'Dri4s Naples;1P .orida, 33940 S Owner: vineyards Development Corporation 20 Napa Blvd. Naples, Florida 33999 Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation 43 Barkley Circle Suite 101 Ft. Myers, Florida 33907 410 !l � i1r 1. OEOaRAPXIC LOCATION: ' �-�-�� ....r .._ _. The subject property is located within the Vineyards , PUD, bounded on the west by AirportrPulling Road (C.R. 31) on the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road (C.R. 862) and on the east by Livingston Road extension, in the north 1/2. of Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County Floridan .and .is approximately 196.69 acres in size. (See illustration following page) . 2. 7EOUEBTED ACTION: The petitioner is proposing to subdivide a 196.69 acre . tract within the Vineyards PUD/in q 275. single family hom rtes, two multi-;family'traots and ,a commercial , ,.�.,. trays 3 011 '1,• . : • 4% • ; • = re. , ' The petitioner' proposes +ta subdivide • 196.69 acre tract .�ti�.. within .the Vineyards PUD, west of Interstate 75, into ;!, - -275 �s�ingle family residential lots with a minimum lot • 1,- • ,` 1.---_,... - • - i "-----, :1------- N K°` 2 ,7" ,..,--% If ' 7 1 ,,, it , ' .L,,,"„.., . 1 - - "® W33 fr 1 ' �� 8A • 11.3 J ....... id We. loam um E :1 :� 1. 11 .Q •--- It 13 Wit rim AtatMCt AIMS WO MAW' .113110.rnet eau. 0 43 43 C_t 2 4 �,' ._ co.la a! "a i3 �''3 ` s NAnt3-Iwu0Kµ2t ROAD 1 2I , C, •- imaoo � 1_ (C.&144) c�4 do ' 1arnlulr,oN%1 1• n L.,� w r to 1: W I? . : 'ti tntftl, g t.U1410 9 P(O \ CTLO4tIOW 26 3, I U x 21 n 11 3. I1 tar111 2' /21 U AN ES ikTES vorri .......„.......„......, •« ,►i.t .Moa.I itio • 1 • 1 (J(��3 1 t INT Pe 07117 1 Gr.i ,...., L "4" 40 v r .' ____:4) 1 . ' J at C i. ,fr* 0Mt I -*K1fI tf1UrfU. VI mi 4 241. 1 11 NILOC tNatl pNp i s IMT n Uff I • , r+ t0017 L 3'J-- 31 3 r°t'tio 41 ., . 32 34 �t: .- IPS aga "`"C 12.••••'; 1. a ° :. — _ -- ' Q t •.•" _._— .. ./-{,mac; PINK RIDCC ROAD ( R. in ItT', � inix, -a went, �++, •;I a NWLI KU'c.4X1 3.71• C.v3 I. same. u II n It /1 2 1y.. of W* at ::_.: 11.....=.'a...,77114.2,. . , 9b C=4. -2 �IOb 2 eta I n 1 3 2 t13 t F. v. 1 i 3 . • } �3 t 1� D. IS O !. 1t se„ r I 1f 27 4 • .�_� !meant GOLDEN GATE 18. C A , , "".''• 1.a taw , t7 NT L .. .. fJ NAPLES rIF; an- "' T NI WW i!i a� x„ `�► i ` 1 .' 't'PI g P. ' —0-4 22 loo.tot..n.«.(CA a�., 4 GOLDEN ( 1. ' NIGII 111E01 Niiimm4ommwpmglrMIPII7144i ,311ire.., ~Me3, , tn ., .... . ... , ,, . Dif .-itel'7 ../, ,..ie, 1 • •,,, 4.1..1 ii - r.0, .. .. --,.,,,,,,,,..y, _qr ► t . _ i 'r, 4. an, rittilip� itiljil ji , , . curl,. ION ' . ttl �t4StijZ . 4, 8 A1 : 1illi S1iI ] t • ',, C-1011 'fit i,. + : i•• ._._ t .i' . . • .1_; 1 11th, ►1114#►t►#11�1i1Hll.a,� u. 1,,, ,,600,--,A4.„. 41,1..t.. . u 11 IQ! ,lIli . ,,, )104*. 4,..",. . , • i , i; ,----Pw.tt :••••.111641111y. 112111110. 4 1 . . '5::......54, 14 2 'gill 1 .f'IX. 1,,, , . t 1 I . ,i a i, , \ibi, a 3,10. 1wat I: ! I:. ', ' , \ ` O',' , I t'lit ■ ,'• .,„ p . i„ : . . r t �f` . .it ,t s 1 , ,� I 1 I 0, t tIi t i t�t Q ` � J i . fr 10 . r . ! f i ii s. ,*�- i 1' r tT� { � i t6 , P1Pt0P �_` i ij . 0 I ' '..%. 11.,,Dki t�q"gpr V j ., 3N•lvi eeaa ..-.. add 11 d gait• 0p t ; i 1 l ...1 t"i 11111,: i t. .. �: �� a!'f erre';�y I ' .14,. lai&agolthedigLA n i I . 1 .. ifs► gall ' �.� ,,I,- W«f H ' : ..c :RI 21: •t 1:;,.. :1, \ is ; ' IS, It I iff li si i; iN :. .1 ; i ! II.' iq il I il 1 ( £ .LV i'i.; ,. /04.11,, • I1II u44.a lll . i wg 1 ''- - '."7" 11114 size of 7,200 SF (Block B) and a maximum lot size of 8A 11,050 SF (Block C) . In addition, there are two multi-family tracts totaling 33 acres (Tracts MF-1, MF-2) , 31 acres of lakes, 14.92 acres of primary road, 5.91 acres of commercial (Tract CR) , 18.37 acres of easements :and 0.71 acres of common area. Access to the proposed subdivision is provided from Vanderbilt Beach Road, an existing two lane collector facility and Airport-Pulling Road an existing 4 lane arterial facility. Also an access road is proposed to connect with Livingston Road when Livingston Road is completed. 4. GURROUNDIN4 LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: currently the 196.69 acre tract is zoned PUD, is undeveloped, and historically was an agricultural field. The site is void of natural vegetation. Surrounding: North - Vanderbilt Beach Road, and A-2 zoning. East - Livingston Road, and Vineyards PUD zoning. South - Semi-developed Citrus Gardens PUD zoning,. and A-2 zoning. West - Airport-Pulling Road and A-2 zoning. Zonina Consistency Schedule: Air 11 Zoning Lot Area Ft. Lot Frontage FT. Yard Requirement pistrict Reeuired Provided Required Provided Front Rear Side . PUD Block A 9,375SF 9,375SF 75 ft 75 ft 25ft loft 5ft Block B 7,200SF 7,200SF 60 ft 60 ft 20ft 20ft 5ft Block C 11,050SF 11,050SF 85 ft 85 ft 25ft 25ft 7.5ft 5. GROWTH MANAGEIjNT PLAN CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located within the "Urban Residential" area on the Future Land Use Map of the . Growth Management Plan. The subject property, 196.69 acres' is ,part',of the Vineyards 1,925.4 acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Development of Regional Impact (DRI)! signifioanoe. The Vihiyards PUD is approved for a maximum of 3,071 single family units, 3,907 multi-fLWily units and 71.1 acres of commercial toning. The overall gross density is . 2;tt�3Cs.;per acre, and is consistent with the� l,C4 fail'geaent Plan. . '' +ri�fc�f f 1. A •. J 8A By method of fractionalization, the density granted for the subject property was 320 single family units and 430 multi-family units or 3.8 units per gross acre. The base density permitted within the "Urban Residential" area is 4 units par gross acre, therefore this subdivision is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The subject property also contains 5.91 acres of commercial property. Due to the vested status of the Vineyards PUD/DRI, the amount of commercial property within this project is deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 6. rVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL. TRANSPORTATION AND ;NFRASTRUCTUS : This petition has been reviewed for environmental, transportation, utilities, fire and other engineering considerations. All Collier County reviewing agencies and staff involved in the review process have provided a recommendation of approval, subject to certain stipulations which have been made part of a stipulations Agreement Sheet (Exhibit "B") . . 8 7. ANALYSIS: • The purpose of the Subdivision Master Plan process is ons of providing a legal basis to convey individual lo ts and/or tracts of land from a parent parcel (public or private) intended to serve the individual lots or parcels of lands upon which development is contemplated. The Subdivision Regulations Ordinance No. 76-6, as amended is the principal regulatory document that governs the subdivision of land. This Ordinance addresses certain design and improvement standards. Access to the proposed subdivision is from Vanderbilt Beach Road, an existing two lane collector facility and Airport-Pulling Road an existing 4 lane arterial facility. Also an access road is proposed to connect with Livingston Road when Livingston Road is completed. The Transportation staff has reviewed ingress and egress at these intersections and finds the followingt In view of the traffic volumes generated by the project and the adequate sight distance, the entrances as designed, should function adequately and with an acceptable level of safety. `(%A5-ii r1M'4oD. a. pesian Issues Regarding the design of the subcivision, it is the opinion of staff that the design of this subdivision is • executed in a manner that enhances the quality of the (t?air,. � No. 4 8A P .. • environment of each proposed lot. The streets are laid out to discourage high vehicular speeds by virtue of their curvilinear design. The use of cul-de-sacs enhances people's perception of optimum lot configuration and privacy. The Water Management/Lake Easement also enhances the perception of open space and esthetics. It is staff's opinion that the petitioner should construct a sidewalk parallel to and south of Vanderbilt Beach Road from Airport Pulling Road to Livingston ,Road for pedestrian access. The corner of Airport ; Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road is a designated Activity Center Site, allowing 160 acres of commercial and mixed land' uses. Located to the east of •I-75 and south of Vanderbilt Beach Road is a now elementary school and • county park. Staff feels that a •sidewalk would provide parents and children of Stoneybrook Estates a safe and essential means of travelray to these locations. 8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION! Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition SMP-90-28 to the BCC with a recommendation for conditional approval, subject to the stipulations listed 411 on the agreement sheet, and noted as Exhibit "B" which is affixed hereto and made a part of this staff report. PR$PARED BY: - - SAA.,.., KA kik- a7- ?c! BRYAN M;LK DATE P-.. -CT PLANNER 4111El ls qt K METH W. BAGIN KI DATE PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER y� - �� , , ' yam � , : .& e.=-u.ei FRANK W. HR , AICP DATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR st. al rm: ;Id/ 1 . A 1,:!..r,rcr.1 I t.0 ; NO. ti / r °s' " „ 1 1 ocr2 390 4 t`` a ' ' .., 8A 4` : ( environment of each proposed lot. The streets are laid out to discourage high vehicular speeds by virtue of their curvilinear design. The use of cul-de-sacs enhances people's perception of optimum lot configuration and privacy. The Water Management/Lake Easement also enhances the perception of open space and esthetics. It is staff's opinion that the petitioner should construct a sidewalk parallel to and south of Vanderbilt Beach Road from Airport:(Pulling RQad .to.. Livingston ;Road for pedestrian access. The corner of Airport !.Pulling. , ; Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road is a designated Activity • Cehter Site, allowing 160 acres of commercial and mixed land' uses. Located.to the east of a-75 and south .of Vanderbilt Beach Road is a new elementary school and County park. Staff feels that a 'sidewalk would provide parents and children of Stoneybrook Estates 'a safe and essential means .of 'travelway to these locations. 8. FIAT,' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition SMP-90-28 to the BCC with a recommendation for conditional approval, subject to the stipulations listed 41 on the agreement sheet, :and noted as Exhibit "B" which i is affixed hereto and made a part of this staff report. PREPARED BY: el.-1, v , (; � ,4.,-16..,..\ A llXIc1—_ y- n - ?c, BRYAN MILK DATE p;•. -CT PLANNER :LO\ttis. K NETH . AGIN KI DATE PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER a7 ,.',:i.':. '.:-1.. 1-6.4& . y--.. 7•-• FRANKW. RUTT, AICP DATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR .. .� ^ 9d 7 ; �„ • .41‘1.0r;% . ,•, .e%4 OCT 2 3(, QOiP� , ., V \- .. T• L- .~ •..... / �....t r...� +..�.'. �,.: � .....:r.: .a.�.irw.... ..... - ' .... r.a. 8A •'�r�. ,p �, '..r„+..q,.A Tj(- et; trcr',"FN'k • . 411 Petition Number: SMP-90-28 .. , ”11-0 .; Staff Report for October 4, 1990 •CCPC'nlaeting. NOTE: This Petition has ,beet} advertised.for the October 23, 1990 BCC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY•-:PLANNIHG'COMti3S$tb ':� �'• k ' .�� (e9au tf R. FREDERICK K ES, CHAIRMAN SMP-90-28 STAFF REPORT Ind . , J.. �.' f,' 7 L1.L• �` fir,• .. < is.e'• �, 4 ~,', , 4 :'T,41 00262 OCT 8A pRBAN DESIGNWTION 1 URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT -- -- Urban Residential Sub-district A. The proposed uses are consistent with one or more of, the following residential uses. (circle applicable uses) .,,Nr,.;! \ • Single-Family • Multi-Family • Duplex Mobile Home Mixed Use Residential (PUD) .41 ,/ YES , NO N/A B. Proposed residential density is consistent with density allowed by point rating system (see attached density rating sheet) . YES , X NO C. Proposed uses are consistent with one or more of the following non-residential uses. (circle applicable uses) • Essential Services generally defined as services designated and operated to provide water, sewer, gas, telephone, electricity, cable television, or communications for the general public. CI) Parks, open space and recreational use. .. "A cCommunity facilities such as churches, cemeteries, • schools, fire and police stations; utility and 0110 communication facilities. • Earth 'mining, oil extraction and related processing. • Agriculture. . -- Travel trailer recreational vehicle parks provided that the following criteria are met-the site has 'direct access to a road classified as an arterial, the use will be compatible with surrounding land uses, and the proposed density is consistent with the density outlined in the TTRVC Zoning District. r, • ' Support medical facilities such ss•physicians' i offices, medical clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers, and pharmacies .(as .long as the dominant use is medical related) may also be permitted provided they are located within.1/4 mile of hospitals or major treatment centers that are existing or approved at the time of plan adoption. • • Commercial Under Criteria (see applicable sheet) . • • Industrial Under Criteria (see applicable 'haat) . YES NO N/A j , . -,' , ' , IPMfio1 KOITADt.ITIA 9ti%- T'.s'491Agi4 & TH Hgos1v3,' 'CZ tile`` +` M �.' c•: , • �w..A '..ry -1 '\• p . ..• .. ". .L '�+' ; lir— " .- ._ _ . .... . ... 8A SUBDIVISION jIASTER PLAN APPLICATION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDk fii NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards SUB UNIT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ise ettachtst OWNER: The Vineyards Development Corporation - ManaoinQ Entity Pr(ocacci Brothers Sales Coroorats on - Dynes_ a mercer inc1udina t(eDles Fruit and Ytaetable Company, NTT P,x oduce ComoanY_. HFV 'C-orpora_tio_n tSe_e attached deeds and mercer doeument. l PHONE: (8131 353-15S1 ADDRESS: c/o Wafee Assam. 20 NtD4 B) 11V.rt, Naples. Fl . 33999 AGENT: Anchor Encineerina Consultants. Inc. PHONE:1813) 649-1351 ADDRESS: 790 Harbour Drive. Hamlet, Florida 33940 EXISTING ZONING: P.U.D. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 7.200 S.F. SIZE OF PLAT (ACRES) : 196.69 NUMBER OF LOTS: 275 SOURCE OF UTILITIES: WATER: Collier County Water Sever District SEWER: Collier County water Sever District PRE-APPLICATION C ENCE IS REQUESTED YES, NO X tlE/se7 CTURE OPAPPi T,�"+6 n (35) of this application st be sub mitted to theDivisionofCommunityDevelopentServicesvith the folloving attachments: information 1. asirequired cbyiSectionthe 3�Master ArticlePlan IX vofhthel Subdivision Regulations. 2. A check, money order, or cash in the amount of the required fee of $250.00. DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: BY: �. .,' COJJ�MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - SHP APPLICATION FORM ` •+ „ 410 `' i2fSMPF2 (1) 0Q2 3 t',. 00365 ,,¢ , ;', t "'"" DO 1 126 + 'f 009231305 t iStWt20 'Xi t} is ,� OR etOM PAGE (' 'cows MOOT. •RECORDED i • ... . . . . . ' ',"..4'.. ."'"-»1 'M;.•..�.i�+.:wj.».:wi «. .�r"a'j?'••A •w>?..�1 wl«.1-:;,. i,.iy;«yt:..i•«y^ .4.,._....,...„ . • ......,,,,•,..• „...„.• ...••-.•.:..• ••. r• • • • •• •••••♦ eQ • v. ' Vf• 7. % tt. Cl. :t:- • 1., iti :4:,.; .4.4. .ta T yr t v{b a tit: ' aVF ` moi. z ! '. f 33rptrtmntt of iitu1, , ki 1 -11 :,,,.,i, , , 4;f, . . ; ',!' 44% 2 certify t a attached is • trim tad cornet espy of Arclalaa 6 �• ,:$ • of Nestor, filed w !Orrery 1, 121$, martial CARDEN STATE ,Vii,, . tk TAMS. INC., a tnaaylneaia corporation. wry i*ODuCI COlttAlr1. �i 53 •Vil . • :0• d wrt c�ua&ATIOi. laid, Florida torperstises ant r13-CET t •r! LX:122121I1. INC., a amlavate corporation lost flOCACCI 11601. DVC t' SAISS CCRT4RAT201t, t Taafsylrasls corporatist sec qualified is • • .;j} rialto, as shwa b7 the•tausis of this *flies. Li D 4: • D_ 4 :14. id . • `t l3iDtn nnbtr n aanb snb tfjt Z.\t‘. et east*rot of tbt lFtitt of ylsnD1. 0 % N �'' it Lrallahalitt.tht Capitll.this the c c : is cn Dap pt Match. 1263. V 1vJ♦y 4//•{_a1 cam. t . ..7tia_____.----- r� m ,r.ir i e may" 7 I • . {, �ttrttarl of$$aftnp 1 +\�tw-:•,..:4,,,, =`r.7t ::"•17''�,......2., �T•IX._ : :s •- •:''�.i: rr�;rrj-.I.•I iwr•M„...1.,;;;„.., �'••OCr rro - .v •�,.• T 4 �;e 10 ... . .„-:).44..c..,....„:„., . -. , .: ' . aay...W1) ,, .. I Na • {yU�3,7' 0(1 2 3 9G i:Q } ► t' P . /3 14 i`. 8A 4 . • • • , •• • . - .- .. •• • - - „..• „IA,' I .. -** ' •414UOILlar' . cr.'- : NR7 • .. • z. , Ott • . — .. ,.. •. 4121111.•• fioIEi• •• .. 'a II ,•-•-•••L .' •• • 41171. "17" I , • • , • ,.. re: . .-.• • •• .. , I. ______ Lgge°t0J. It latititilltret r • 1 . • ' I 4$1.4.,•S• . &age ekb ,'• igth..• '411of -04).` •.i.D.10 SS • . 1. . . . • .. ....."'.4.$'a% • iletWOCI. uM 10. CLIDO221, joined Ids idea. =M.A. =IOW, • .• . !. , • .. . . , 1 - ! • . • . • • . , • . • . . : •• , . . • • • of the Cowl*qf Millar smeStatuf _florlita • • Part boat theftnt pat,and PL AS 111121=ta Illelld=ht . . ' . . 44.•• a arpnettas existing under thelexe te the Shea nr need& 4, -... .. „, . head Us prilegi&leo of hews ts at thast.if haO * * mil • I.•' • : . State of . ?Myr/thaaamipast, . • V• . . • : "• - • • . ... • • liVitutostilb, that the ea podia' ef the jbetpert,forendln evneideration ' : • . of the tam or =I=SLUM urn=OR Wataillilt Untitdied=5-...Darkai. . ii: . • •— , _• - ••••• the - ahem(k herd/eeknendatend,he is • .ermra , ,n•-, ••, . -, - , -, - • ' ' •• firmed end - thew presents do „ • • , • • , ukase, •• 8 a4ratif,e emu itre and ma ,ante air triparty Os Mertilgts aredet .• !,,... ewe end aatins Amer,an that eaten payer if id end lane ha.like; .. ••• ••• ••• Medd et.. Caller . and Mee Ef' nuns putkehnip-, r ,,,, •,.. _... ... •:....... .: . :•eptispika iffibrkam.,..•:.-... :,. -.•....... .•••, . . .-.......- ...:.................•...:.:.w.. ,...... v.... ......%..- .. . . ! — . egrapotla Ulf DIV et tho sortemost'amitscallitr st lloodasS.••;:-.:... — d.. ;,-• .1 ', • ling1411Enar r.. - • . .....- f..- .1.1.• t V ••• '••• • . • • • • • ft.*. 'L.:...; *':. •init , ..11.111MINO Vilt4,111Platar. eg Ilit •• •-• • :•;,.' 4771r; ......•'••••• • • CO11.371110111 of Isom,or that.an,atosamovonoor or inalootios sandal. .:. ;;•',- ,i.g •••• L '‘:' •'''. . Aliscloso foe acada. toastraatios f. oadeVaLlotati- laitUat• - - •• ••.1. ;,!-:-.• ' •.tadaptiani sags paw Ilass;Ixaxam wIta,.oadhil MAO=am.01211091a: !•• 4:•.,: _..::....t.-,..: manor.USD.'.ea*Mt'cattaineentow.gbnUltr.Cteeter.. #4 f.j.::.7::: ' austed.Nas sum=CIMOOltdaa,..a Iltiodia ;•.datamtNnti,S;•, C.:...7t'-• ... 'Min lin*caloblat My li, Mill,ihi O. aoillt.132.'Imos 411,1871hdatia4t1,41 .. i...;•?, ---7- :;•seeg-I't IiiiiilbriirebILUEr Closataviktfkoltia,laitlii:111111motadithalotali fi'.• • "V' risi)Killitest Ude/Yid tattoo Iimili • • ,.AlLtIlisilsk GNAW `,. • • ki • ft:0k narlimisoriefimii '!-',"' . • .., iiie-"C's .' ";, ,11-. • t;.. ik • , • •• - - N , • ., i• *,...J.. I,- 4' •r.:1,•••••;••••• ..7444 'Jr • :41,44 r • ..• •' a ...„..... .,....., xiii,... ....s...„1 ... ...,.....;.7.54r.:.r.,11.,,„.41,,, . p.-1.7. -s...,.....;:......„:..... ,... • ,..1/40.i14..............,;;; ,,, 0:44.4..efty. :pl. _ .?_,.-,-4 .17*'irT.N.41.":4•Itt".ACZia.• -..-7 r••t r:".?',.:-rilg- •.-- 7.- T.):,-'...%4.-2.•'.F.:- * 14', • • :10 'le*'....:- 413:. -f---,. %VS...K.,. •--.• .01,:s.,-1, ''' 'Zi.4 r-• ::-.., ,....4...,bi, '• -._. . vgif... .1.-.44A7.1541.1:•..2.74,e,rt.14.--,; _i..44--tir, ritilleiss. itr --'-r,,, .„........ .,,, • ........ •r; ir. Tr4Mia : r. •.4,3° • 74.. . •• 4".%. ti.•114.1 W74? ...• ' '.. •- • 4•ir•P „.„ tr.:.; •,,, 4.1,1•1.441'.• .7'...." •-"••• .1 ;• r'• ;'',V-4•••••••.i.-..cipi-- .. • -" ' ••• . • ,i •... .,•• ... .- • :. ...4 . . 4.-• .......f........ -,....,,,,z .,-4 t. • 1 . i a; .1-.' 'Ad,; •kst•c-1-•ravt:,r.9.,.:-.:.-e--..•-.."••••:,.. ;--* - 1,a:rl“,.. . ••1...-ei:r.•?....,„,;•?•• tit •r. i, •....• ,..• lirtiolismatati; • Pi•' •...... -Ow Apt.SM.Wend and otste,dmorantsight disoweronealin,' c:•:Zi2 1" i;:••::;4.1:"• • asioncoadmaatoteksaltal wise/mai t.'eitrA'.,-.1s:-iii. • -••"•-f1:::. --.f. -•• •••"'•,...:; : • ""••• , :.:..i... . .•.• - •.• •0.,14.7 Irw 3.0...' r .. .4.4..15.* ! f..4tTo.'115riii and to'Ifoldstiliiii:aosiaokfinger .'-., 1 -4.cki•-.:4- ..•.7. •• .,.... •• . . . •rf )1,.. 1-r• -•::1'•'..", 'e-,..Amit As asitipsdloo$thaltrat port do :,imarial*Oh the all parto CI: ..- . .. . . . •thantimipart Rat thRT...ate gaifigradNdielbiat der;';' .: 'v!.!:-..:......, IMO of alltawasaa,ow thst Ow low...fint mod 1011 i r 0 A :.:'.4. .: v.', •tomtit tam isinnand sass odd pan• ••grosamipssi t. Ar I t •.1--.`'....• • u•nue tip ssid.tote,sot ain&lima the gassiddigas .. .• .1111,i. ....••• •,•• ,A...4,..y. jpenana edneemetwer6.‘..,.:; ... ..: •.'.:-.v•••• • • .1;-1, Jr.!'rkik•:it.J.t.t. •'''':i';ii: .a•ve:„ ;•-,-. ... .. ••-,. •.-,••Cs-a,d-,....-•..1. . AP!. .44. . •• • • • /1 t:•'"b•e•••. ‘ .•.4•1311171,11/1Sali lighere040,01.11 WAS. ek•itir:Iggaws.iblealelt. Walgellft.• Pr.. -4 ii.......,....--.7.„, -- —Illidit,-had andoulauksal. -.A••0,4%,-.•1.......aii..4. ••-..; f..1 .,, ...--:• •T'-' .111.14_,...t•'•':•.44••• ••• ..' S'''•• ,:••• ••.••:•••4'•••• --allig• lir--•-• •-• • •'•"*.:::-...4t*,-;"•t1"...:•••••*- : ' ;,• H"•'.•• .10111411elhaingildlimailliteieltaniiii;'''"?.i;t''''.'•'-'!' •'-•-•:.-4::.•y--wwsrf•ic•on • . - .. s.."... . -... -s-rt.-- 'ft-.?", •••-:' 'Pi/ ''.4.• -3.- :•••••'"•'•'•i'':' !'-:7.;:••••:.....t.P.;-1-.7.102.:•••:•:*A:.-t.--.1 •••••• -.**:;!"-!`• * -Ir- • I. .• ..: ..• ..-.. .....,•. ..: .. sr. / ..... 4.0 „.... • ....4.1.1t1• : ;•,,t* ••,..• •AVE, / A, '1'... • • . 4.• • • • •• sl 4.. • il•;•••••1 .1.•.... IP. .....-:-...3 '• / . • I--. ' ''''7 •.• ,..0............, . • • ...•,. I •!....%.'•'••• • .-. 11A1rr"i........-..:••• '• •. '•-.'-s'zI::• . -—•- : ••I'1 •, 1• . , -.•- , .. - t , . -• • . • • . .••,. •„ •••••• t ••.•0,4• r• e •• '•.,' •• ••••'' • ..% 4.. • • ' • r •••• •••• 4••• f : • ' . •••••• • 147...4, • • ) 11,•1*.A.•• • • ••• a .1, !'- ••••• ...."•7.• • • ...:•ir d'.1,.. . ...45?il•* •i ' ' • • .. .... 71 44,1 •: .4.:1"•!Er.......**0. c . , j.,.... ,41,• „.• . ..fr.„ . • ..: .....•• t.• .. .• tit. •.":•:••••..;,. • ze' ••. •,".1"-.... •• ..:i.,;le•;m44.1 ..ti•. .,, f.,,i•:.‘•,;;;;,." Of Agt.. ! '...*:•-••:'''' 11...$;4174 ::!"..S.% .4*.i0...4.1.'s"1%....1' j1.1" .1f.'61:T•••*Ct..'" .• • • 3 .1,,„%.,„,. - . .••••..r,,c,...,,,,....;,...:el, -.., ,. _,,/- •.•.601t•...•.•4•re ••••••••: •... link: IP ---- ,t v.r' ‘•t 01•••••••••4‘11, , ..N.I.f...:1‘'.. . 4-..._ • 8A ATTACHMENT I 0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN• THE_HORTH 1/2; OF SECTION 1,.'TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,. RANCE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCk'28YD• AZ FOLLOWS!' "I i') ,H A COHMENCINO AT THE NORTHWEST:I-CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13 THENCE ` SOUTH 89 ' 44' 21" EAST A. DISTANCE OF 100.12 FEET TO APPOINT ON ^ THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF'-'VANDERBILT •BEACH".ROAD, (150' WIDE) AND BEING THE POINT - OF. BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE 'COt4TIHUINO SOUTH '89 '' 44•' 21* EAST.- ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2542.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER .OF-.THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF 'SAID .SECTION , 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 .40' 06" EAST ALONG ..SOUTH RIGHT»OF-WAY LINE q••A' DISTANCE OF-2861.58 -FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER .OF.NSAIDSECTION• ;_ THENCE SOUTH 02 '4 .22' 41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1585.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST COR?IER dig THt' HOft (1/2 OF THE (NORTHEAST '1/4: OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE NORTH 89 ' 43' 47" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2839.31 „JET ;TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 1) •` THENCE, NORTH 89'' 45' 57" WEST A DISTANCE .OF, . 2558.92 FEET TO A. PO1NT ON THE EAST'SIDE OF .A 100 FEET CANAL RIGHT-OF-YAY AND BEING 100 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1DTHENCE OFR 1590.04343 FEET5" WEST' ALONG TO THE POINT OTABCANAL RIGNT- . OF-WAY A RGINHIN0 DISTANCE CONTAINING 196.69 ACRES ?FORE' OR LESS. � ; ~.4.: v_ .I, i ( E ) Na:"Jtl 'r ,,1 • • ' , f . 1 xi '' P .%4 . •fly , s 1'I, Ili . P . a. 6A �,, SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN FORMAL CHECKLIST (Following Pre-Conference) To Be Completed By Avolicant 0 1-..- `DATE: -June 15. 1990 REFERENCE FILE: 2242-01 2. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: (INCL. TWP, RANGE AND SECTION, Stoneybrook Estates' At The Vineyards All of N 112 NE 1/4 end NA/2 NW 1/4 Sectibn 1, TovnshLP 49S, Range •25E 3. CONTACT AGENT; (NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. ) • anchor Engineering Consultants. Inc. ___- • ++ 790 Harbour Drive. Re oles.. Florida 33940 ', .(82.3)' 649.,1551 4'.% RESPONSIBLE PLANNER: (COORDINATOR) : Bryan Milk '!'hila ch'arklist -must be completed and submitted as part of the Subdivision Masten Plan Application. A pre-application meeting With the ment SerVicia pis' recommendedlanninsprior iston submitting of the muthis Subdivnitision Raster Plan sppiication package. Thirty-Five (35) copies of this checklist, the application and • tubdiVi$ion masts! plan and othat appre;tiata rslalid sublittad .. to the Division of Community Development. Services in order to formally initiate the review and approval process. r 3) N. .10- ) 2 d . 411‘ 1 :'.1 E . S Tx . • . ..)6.0. ' OCT .. . .._..... - x. . ..:.. . = irk _. . 8A • III ' ' 5. CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION ! 410 . c ov Required Recommended Provided Information Manner of Not . Display . : Yes No . , Applicable (a) Name o su s v on or SMP',identifying ! ; identifying title which shall not Plat' . ,, ' WS , . ;'. -, , , duplicate or closely.•approximate ,,,_. , :', : the name of any other subdivision 1 � in the incorporated or unincorporated • „ . area' of Collier County. • . (b) A vicinity plan showing the SMP location of the tract in reference Plan YfJ to other areas of the County. , . , • . , ..---..-----• •• .:.i •.•1• .•.• • . . •i.'., • t '; i (c) North arrow, graphic scale .S?�. nrj , .: and date. ._ , . . . , Plan •... . • • . , (d) Name, address and telephone SMP Ya number of the developer, along with Plan the name and address of the engineer and surveyor responsible for the plan, ' plat and supporting data. • • The location and names of adjacent SMP la divisions, if any, and plat book .Plan ' tl ' w and page reference. : (f) The tract boundary with bearings SMP . • Yil 1 and distances along with written Plan • description. • • (g) Topographical conditions on the SMP YFI tract including all the existing Plan watercourses, drainage ditches and bodies of water, marshes and other , significant features. (h) All existing streets and alleys . SMP Yr.” on or adjacent to the tract including Plan , name, right—of—way width, street or .-': N , � _ pavement width and established , ; 1 , ; ,_, centerline elevation. Existing street's_ , , . , . , , , • , ; , , ..I ,,,,.s t,t shall be dimensioned to the tract ,, :, . , } • . , ,,..` ,,.F qii. boundary. „ 1, , _ .. t e'• 13(0 • (i) All existingproperty lines, , , SMP Tian .' ", ' • '' ' .1.I.1','' easements and rghts- of —way, their And Narrative • '' f,^ ' 'J `'Y .0 to fact on the property,, o:PIE ;:.i:1 , • oa-aao�� 4111.411.061) ifo) divid�d,,y r.t hr,la +.1 ,t11e-sLupez fra tot rtotina .ILasg Tx,:�:.' _ rtYo { .ncilq bho no2loa �nxaii act tett. I /.tti -- , ',[, ,...,, rte:. ....;I �►,tR' :�•L... ._ '. ....s.�.\.=�.,:n..�-.�_Kir.+l` M 8A 1 —.._ 5. (CONTIN;UED) Required Recommended Provided Information Manner of Not • Display Yea No Appli,cab' The ocat on an- r g t-o -way - - ' an • width of all prosed streets, And Narrative •., alleys, rights-of-way, easements Companion ; and their purpose (include typical ROW cross-section and the pad layo:r 'of the lots and blocks) . Indicate name of streets on all proposed 'streets. (k) The number, dimension and size SMP Plan In YES of all lots including proposed uses. Legend Form (1) Access points to collector and SMP arterial streets showing their Plan Yf.$ compliance to the access requirements - established by this Ordinance. (m) Ground elevations by contour line SMP ,,•':,.,:t at intervals of not more than one foot Plan • ':s (1) based on "the NGVD". ' b. , (n) All existing drainage district SMP Plan And facilities and their ultimate right- Narrative YES 0 of-way requirements as they affect Companion the property to be subdivided. . (o) Generalized statement of sub- SMP Plan And . surface conditions on the property, Narrative YES location and results of tests made Companion to ascertain subsurface soil ,- conditions andround water depth. (soil study (p) Zoning classification of the tract SMP yf� and all contiguous lands. Plan (q) Utilities Plan showing telephone, SMP Plan power, water, sewer, fie; etc. , And Narrative 'YFj on or adjacent to the tract including Companion existing or proposed water treatment . • • plants and sewerage treatment plants. ;,;: The ma tercel shall contain a statement that all utility services shall be ', " yes - ` ''` "' - available and have been coordinated with •1 • . , ,�� L t:i (t} all required utilities. . . _ '3R9atlhAo • (r41nficate, Cross-S*Ction''and SMP Pldn'Anb1=?``=`=q ods £10 J1e1 P1I Specification for all required In Legend Yc r ., yi ::1 landseapanbarriers, screen and plant Form +.:;0 =5.. veQetatib9n. ,• :'t::;�I a) bOCrZ ` ► t .'..a.\--, (S) . �A/ �` t 'I t • f, ; 1 , . , , • r. •* '' ' V 4 i � Wi - !., +..' 8A • , , -''711 .e�• . e 7,—,17 ,1;11tDrI 3 1'brioctA r • 5. (cofTzuurn) • _.__'___ Required Recommended Provided InformationManner of Not • • Display Yes No Applicab s Most recent avai a. e ear a Companion photograph of subject perperty. Map YES /9GM (t) Traffic Impact Analysis pursuant Narrative ., , to condition of Subdivision Ordinance Companion • ' • (u) Master drainage plan pursuant Narrative ' • : to condition of Subdivision And Map, Yf1 Ordinance. Companion (v) 'Identification of all flood SMP hazard areas along with base flood Plan ,t! Elevation data. (w)' Approximate size, type,,and height SMP Plan of. existing trees and removal plan Legend And 'Ye/ •`I '4 Narrative "" Companion '' /"R a•J , : tv:td::I (x) Total area of parkland, trails, SMP Plan yr1' recreation areas, etc. , with specific Legend area calculated for •each of the following: 40 _ areas to be dedicated to public ownership - areas to be retained in private ownership . . , (y) Environmental Impact Anilysis Narrative ��yrf • •-4,, pursuant to County Ordinance Companion ' No. 77-66. • • ts) Preferable Mapped Data Sat • (i) Cover sheet showing general vicinity drawing and table of napped contents , (ii) Boundary, Topographic and Soil Borings , (iii) Subdivision Master Plan showing layout and dimension of all lots, blocks, parcels (iv) Utility and Water Management Plan showing typical cross :notion , (v) Natural Features and Vegetative Cover Map showing water bodies, . wetlands vegetative cover, etc. • (vi) Aerial Map showing boundary of • SMP area • • , k.,„::, 4. . .... ' ....;•'',', (iG Z V '--;:e1'li.•ri iA .)',J. ••1_. ,Irl.,,I 1 , , ` Wit 1:+1.711 ;204144 (103/1 N OCT i� q VI: • =� .�:•f ,:ea+ w•lra 'PM 440..,; - alb •fit . � ,/ • Iftr a oft a T° r �, t r� .,' Ar I .w.ww 8A Anchor Engineering 'June 26, 1990 Collier County Development Services Department Planning Review Services 2600 N. Horseshoe Drive NaDlta, Florida 33942-6917 �+ ~� Attn: Hr. Bryan Mk Project Planner RE: Subdivision Master Plan Proposed Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards Project No. 2242-01-02 Dear Mr. Milk : We are with this letter transmitting to you our submittal of the Subdivision Master Plan for the proposed Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards. The SNP boundaries are as follows: 1 . Vanderbilt Beach Road Right-of-Way on the North, 2. The Canal Right-of-Way East of Airport-Pulling Road on the Kest. 3. The South Boundary of the N 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and the North 1/2 of the Noithvest 1/4 Section1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida. 4. The East Boundary of the Proposed Livingston Road Right-of-Way on the East. Please note that the Livingston Road Right-of-Way width is under negotiation vith Collier County Transportation Services. A final agreement should be forthcoming soon. Actually, the West Boundary of the 235 foot FP&L easement is the Eastern Boundary of the subdivision lots configuration and is not dependent upon the final Right-of-Way location of Livingston Road. . • 1. e) 790 Harbouf Drlve , Oa 2 3 Q(` ►rtaico 1 ¶3•3044 Naples,Florida 33940 In r+n �► 813449-1551 Ft,Myr112�,S J FAX 813.649.1112 h, �,s 8A • Page 2 of 2 Al], utilities axe available at the proposed site except the sanitary sever. A proposed 20" force main to be constructed under private developer agreements vas verbally approved by the Board of County Commissionets on : May 1, 1990. • Plans and specifications are to be completed by July 15, 1990 and construction is expected to: be complete? in January.1991. Latest information on the progress of this force main may be obtained from Nr. Fred Bloetscher, Pa. of the Collier County Utilities Division. We look forward to your review comments of this SNP. Sincerely, . /James B. Roberts P.E. P.L.S. Project Manager JHR/jma • • 22424' •O \L1 JJ ��- /%� �p/+y • • .1�.. ice �c • • ►. ! •kn�{' `i. � s. . { a, .w�. - 7• t3 ♦.. ,4 •` • _. _., y'•"' j. .. 8A t JUNE 1990 MASTER PLAN APPROVAL SUBMISSION FOR STONtYbROOK ESTATtS THE VINEYARDS A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIN4SION . 1 , 1! 1) : : NORTH 1/4 SECTION 1, T0Vt:SHIP 49 SOUTH, • ' 1` ` RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA '•, DEVELOPER: U.S . HOME 41 ENGINEER OF RECORD: ANCHOR ENGINTERINC • CONSULTANTS, INC. /90 HARBOUR DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 SURVEYOR: ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. AGENT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. APPLICANT: ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 8A 411 MASTER PLAN APPROVAL SUBMISSION FOR STONEYBROOK ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS Engineer of Record: Anchor Engineering Consultants, Inc. 790 Harbour Drive Naples, Florida 33940 Surveyor of Record : Anchor Engineering Consultants, Inc. 790 Harbour Drive Naples, Florida 33940 ITEMEAU 1 . Subdivision Master Plan Application 1-2 2. Subdivision Master Plan Application Fee (*250.00) 3 . Subdivsion Master Plan Formal • Check List Items 1 thru 4 3 4 . Subdivision Master Plan Check List item 5 4-6 5. Project Narrative Plan Check List Item 5 7-13 6 . Zoning - Design - Consistency Schedules Check List Item 6 14 APPENDIX CHECK LIST NARRATIVE JTEK d Agent Agreement Sheet i FPL EasemeneLetter a Soils Analysis Florida Power t Light SMP Review Letter •F . A „, United Telephone System SMP Review Letter �a Cablevision Industries SMP Review Lctttx.. • `.,,t, '}Tii ffSr. al sis {. •• £a' Yr y, x 'x` ' rf c ISG..Y` +>T. ♦ +.yi-tri--a�►'-� "T 1 Il. .� _ � • . l: : •. ji `` Tom... x C. A I SITE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN SET • 3TONEYSR00g ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS SHEET TITLE 1 of 7 Boundary, Topographic and Soils Survey 2 of 7 Subdivision Master Plan 3 of 7 Roadway, Utility and Fater Management Plan S of 7 Roadway, Utility and Fater Management Plan 5 of 7 Typical Road and Utility Sections • 6 of 7 Topogzaphical Map 7 of 7 Area Utilization Map • •i• , I'JU ak 43tV09'1? ,•3 ; loodrilfsT :;��' ft4til� ll� 14� 3h h0. • J'_ + '» • .1, l t tInubn(. noiALv4td• �(/�' • ,yL -, , ', ..� t{•4'1' Tei, `s.i }.R,,`.' .a t nyjAiik "1 f sr 8A ,. •- • STONEYBROOK ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS MASTER PLAN APPLICATION ITEM 5. PROJECT NARRATIVE SM? Checklist It= Feauired Information a The name of the Subdivision is "Stoneybrook Estates At The Vineyards" (The Vineyards of Naples A.U.D. Ordinance ) . b a c See "Location Sketch" on the Cover Sheet of Subdivision Master Plan includes North arrow, graphic scale and date which are shown on sheet 2 of 7 . • d DEVELOPER U.S. Home Corporation 43 Barkley Circle Suite 101 Fort Myers, Florida ..3907 Telephone (813) 278-1177 Fax (813) 278-1914 As shown on Cover sheet and in sheet title blocks ENGINEER 1 SURVEYOR 1 Anchor Engineering Consultants , Inc . 790 Harbour Drive Naples, Florida 33940 Telephone ( 813) 649-1551 Fax (813) 649-1551 • e Located adjacent and to the east of the Stoneybrook Estates is the Vineyards 'Development zoned P.U.D. under Vineyards Development Corp. , C/' Wafaa Assaad O.R. 195 `Page 379, and adjacent to and southwest of ``' I 1 2 1 • :the Project is the F.U.D. "Citrus gardens" 1 c i 1 s 'bnav la 'OiR. 15 Page , 83-88/Refer to Su•div an • :.„y s°I' "1 %bl'm malMaster Plan .sheet 2 ',17., , Nal st(41) alrit 7!�7 ( 'l9 i�et.e. . ) 1 i : 7 J:#^. S'11ni ,' , : %..\A j :s7T' 1e�:y ta .aj ,,. czt vu! *•i 2 yQ•: . r _-.-- \ • J• -.•, i ' 4_,x,4 .•"'� •, ... �.-.. . ,.« 48 A XTr 1: 1M.• Page 2 Refer to "Boundary, Topographic and Soils Survey" . Sheet 1 of 7 for bearings, distances and a written description of the property. g Refer to Topographical Hap, sheet 6 of 7 for topographical conditions . h Refer existing pavement and right of way width, centerline elevation and tie-in to the Boundary Line for Airport Pulling Road (Sheet 3 of 71 and Vanderbilt Beach Road (Sheet 4 of 7 ) of the "Roadway, Utility and Water Management Plan". Refer to the "Subdivision Master Plan" (sheet 2 of 7) . The existing easement that will affect the development is the 235 foot wide FPL easement running north and south on the east side of the site . Meetings have been held with representatives of FPtL to • determine what facilities may be constructed within the easement. It war agreed that a 24 foot paved roadway and a subsurface storm drain pipe may be placed across the easement (This agreement was confirmed by letter, refer to appendix Item H . East of the Citrus Gardens east property line there exists an electrical and telephone pole line running parallel and + 40 feet north of the Development 's south boundary line, (Refer to sheet 1 of 7 ) will be moved by FPdL. and UTS from its present location to two feet north of said boundary line within a 10 foot wide Utility Easement . However west of the said Citrus Gardens property line FRC.. and UTS will place this pole line within a 10 foot wide easement south of the south project property line . 15:440 ' ;'1 Refer to the "Subdivision Master Plan" (Sheet . A ' ` 2 of 7) showing propolt!' right-of-way, �sa'.rrt s �o_ easemcnts,street names and proposed lot •}n90 •. 0 tut' ]syout. Right-Of-Way for the internal 't 'vl,a•y 02 ,1, /d 120' wide at the Vanderbilt Eeich ' RoaOt,'•rntry; 84 foot wide on ..fhe f,•',• ; '" . internal minor collector rtreeta; :0 !eeitlf.. ' F; ,,. '!R ,� ;• ,y ; wide for the local streets. For tyl+i al fes/ 3 • j y • ,_ _ •••• ?'+� , .'i l•r�4 •••• .y, ,.M. — ,.t y+:.•-..,•'•••4W t411...N.;40 44'r/q.� ...u.:.St►t..n .....,..s,;y''.. 8A Pace 3 Cross Sections, see "Typical Rnrd and Utility Sections", sheet 5 of 7. A 20 foot wide access easement will be provided as an entry to the seven lakes from the roadway and a 20' wide maintenance easement will be provided around the perimeter of each lake . A 12 foot wide Drainage Easement will be furnished for each of the storm drains. A 10 foot wide Utility easement located on the lot frontage will be provided for FP&L, UTS and T.V. Cable installation. k Refer to the "Subdivision Haste: Plan" (Sheet 2 of 7) for lot size, number and dimensions . 1 Refer to Project entry/exit off Vanderbilt (Sheet 4 of 7) and Airport F:cad, (Sheet 3 of 7) for intersection configuration. m Refer to "Boundary, Topographic and Soils Survey" sheet 1 of 7 for existing surveyed ground elevations and contours based on ucVD. n As shown on the "Subdivision Master Plan" sheet 2 of 7 the existing drainage facilities consist of a drainage canal parallel to and on the east side of Airport Road and centered 23 feet west of the west property line. A 20 foot wide Drainage Easement exists on property along the property line to serve the above canal . An existing ditch line taking runoff from Vanderbilt Road runs parallel to Vanderbilt Road just north of the project 's north property line . An existing 30' wide drainage easement located on the property along the project 's northern boundary parallel to Vanderbilt Beach Road is proposed to be vacated. On-site drainage handled by the project will be in accordance to the water management facility-s, as shown on sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 7. • o t4 1 "701. 4 . !- 1 Refit to .Soil Boring , location and_._,Rock -' t iso?Jsc�: 'Cbntauz . Location of Rock Lenses and"ry Conoza=Sind :aOeolopy in the Appendix unecr � +"1" < . ` item 0. 2 3 "; : OCT 1 t 4. Mt) -r 8IIMMOMOMMOMMiibA • I Page 4 *The lithology of the shallow subsurface beneath The Vineyards site varies consider- ably in both lateral and vertical directions. Three distinct stratigraphic units, however, were encountered. Uppermost is a fine grained, quartz sand that contains some clay and organic material . Beneath the surficial sands lies a white to gray, hard, randy limestone . In some areas this limestone layer occurs as thin, soft, lenses or is absent altogether . A white to gray, soft sandy marl with some shell and rock material was the final lithologic unit encountered . A generalized, shallow geologic section for The Vineyards site is given in Figure 4 (Item 0-4 ) . The water level at the site varied between 2. 8 and 3, 2 feet below land surface . There was no pattern to the variation in depth to • water except that water levels were highest in the area of the irrigated farm fields . p Refer to Subdivision Master Plan, sheet 2 of 7 for zoning classification of all contiguous properties. q All existing utilities within the development are shown on the "Boundary, Topographic and • Soil Survey Plan", sheet 1 of 7 . Proposed water and sewer will be located within the road right-of-way. Telephone, Electrical , and T.V, cable will be placed In a 10 foot wide easement located outside and adjacent to the roadway right-of-way, see (sheet 2 and 5 of 1 ) . There are no existing or proposed water or sewage treatment plants on or • " adjacent to the site development. See note ' '' ' ` ^ 'l 2, sheet 2 of 7. s.' "5" • -- I' ' Lt AooX - ,bna i' ;-(,From' 'the October 1989 Soils Report as r ' ,.A ' eh /',1:rtea"' " 4”4 ptbliaredi -by Minima!! 6 Associates, lime 0+480 ",__ x.61! .;1,atbn4ryq�4. s tU.67 HentQCo=potation. ; �t.sLiJ.�V • ., 3 s„.r ,� - ; "• . • #: fid . ,. VYt i. Y x �" r' kr:s cla1) 00381 h- %-� .• .r ' A • .,„j • 41, , Page 5 r In accordance with Article X Section 4 of the oilier County Regulation, the development requires a 10 foot wide buffer zone parallel to Vanderbilt Beach Road along the site 's north property line . The buffer shall extend east from the west boundary of Block "A" to the east boundary of Block "C" as shown on sheet 2 of 7. All vegetation shall be minimum of five feet high. a Refer to the "Aerial Photo" of April 1989 sheet 6 of 7 . t Refer to "Traffic Impact Analysis" as part of the Appendix of this report . u Refer to sheets 2, ' and 4 of 7 for lake, storm sewer and weir discharge location . 110 much of the projects surface storm runoff will be directed toward the roadway (roadway centerline low point elevation equals 12.25 NGVD) valley gutter to Catch Basins and on to the internal lakes . Thl other portions of surface runoff will discharge off the landscape directly into the internal lake system. The seven lakes will be inter- connected by RCP which will discharge the detention water to Lake 2 on the west and to . Lake 7 on the east side of the development . From Lake 2 the detention water above the control elevation ( 10. 0' NGVD) will be discharged through a weir control structure and into the Airport Road canal . Water from Lake 7 will discharge east through an intake structure and a pipe to discharge into the Stoneybrook Golf and Country Club of The Vineyards series of lakes (Refer to sheet 2 i 4 of 7) where there is an excess of lake storage . South Florida Water Management calculations are being compiled by Hole Montes and Associates, Inc. and will be presented as a package to include the combined water management computation, for • Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards a • �. Stoneybrook Golf and Country c - th. 1.659's ... ,,+ Developments. Items pursuant to tl FUD y�+ Subdivision Ordinance, arc ar follows:: OCT 2 3 ovo +* 3 j l caJJ> Li°3��2 PS. _ • ' '.' ♦ ,ter 4' ~ , y3' ,. y + C + ♦,ll aft - _ 8A r•r '! 411 Page 6 Section IX Item D 1 . A 20 foot wide Drainage Easement as shown on the Subdivision Master Plan (Sheet 2 of 7 ) will be provided for access to the Airport Road canal . The easement shall be restricted against any permanent structures . 2 . Side culverts shall be sized and installed at both the Developments' entries from Airport and Vanderbilt Beach Road . 3. Each lake is provided a 20' wide access easement from the roadway which intersects a 20' wide maintenance easement arcund each lake perimeter . The rtorm sewers are each provided with a 12 foot wide drainage easement . v In accordance to FIRM map number 120067-0385D the project is within flood zone "X" . This is defined as an area of a 500 year flood event or an area of a 10.0 year flood with average depths of less than one foot over a drainage area of one square mile . The only existing trees of any significance are the pines located along the north boundary of the project . Then will not be disturbed . The Vanderbilt Beach Road entrance to the project has purposely been located at an existing opening in the row of pines . Basically, the trees consist of Slash Pine with trunks averaging + 5 inches in diameter at about 10 to 25 feet in height, x There is a total Recreational Area of 1 .69 acres and small sectio^s of Common area which will be retained in private ownerships under 1,0—'614 the Home Owners Association, see sheet 7 of Ao3nuo, 40,7, `I +til t di .fIP i.,7'Jq 1,2111: t t t,.. ) . , 4' � '4144004141 :9 7ts 0 : 11Z ' r (OM' /Inn i ;,el t:. 7! _ A • Page 7 y The present , status ..o, the property, being, agticultuial, 1=1 altered ' 'the'r brfgInal natural c,onQition opt, the . proper.tyo sme. time i ago. Therefore, t ) :ii taaalumta t1te� 'idrbject will not degrade the environrental 'gUarl'ity of the site especially since, _there are no. Wetland areas and there -'$:13'1 = be' a high 'percentage ?of ,the , exiating ,trees _preserved. Refer to the Vinerds 13,12.1 .4 eagtiOhs 13 through 19 . z Refer to the set of accompanying drawings, consisting of a cover sheet and seven 24"x36" plan sheets . • •1.1 _) 4 _ 1 ' : • ' - ' ' - '• • • t)9'1t,)•'' • .1 :1 • 6 . ' t .a�,. . • • ) . , !C I t� - j } A-31 ,J 1110,i 8:4 • •' • __ r.I; . a.lraw :n013 b1,16upe1 pyr � * (;�� . '"� a'tvt rr .GN �1yb�tN yNA�Ri4A �tO1J m91 k,�A1 tyt,i �Iillottp�ar�. i ',L 5 „ 8A .. .. ... . .. ..... 6. janino. Desion And Public Infrastructure Consistent , Schedules • A, DetloD Condi tiort All design conditions are per standards of The Vineyards of Maples PUD Ordinance. E. Devil oohlept iztjndsrdi. _Q,tidI t tia' All development standards are per standards of The Vineyards of Hap1et FUD Or.di;r)enct. C. n i nQ t:iandirds All .zoning standi.rds are per standards of The Vineyards of Ne.ples PUD Ordinance. ANCHOR ENGINEERING Project No. 2242-01 790 Harbour Drive Naples, FL 33940 Date! August 2, 1990 649-1551 Prepared by,r J8R Subdivision Master Plan Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards EXCEPTIONS TO COLLIER COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 1 . Exceptions specifically set forth in Section 9.02E of The Vineyards PUO document , and any other exceptions directly or indirectly reflected by said PUD document. 2. localwo hundred ft.feet rights-of-waYdistance 84between intersections ripht-of-wayminorr collector. 3. Maximum block length and/or width of two thousand feet . .44. No requlted cross walks. 5.4110x ixctptions rusultin0 ftem PUD AR►fndment Ray unda r+(i4.4 '. r1rt' . 1 �. '. 4.+. • .1 aF h•''.�r.__ _. - ... '.•tit ._ _ __ ;. .r✓.... ' _ • - •0404• • •-•". ,•, , 46 AS • , \- C* \ . , • • APPENDIX STONEYBROOK ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN •) . 7 • . • . . • . • . • • JUNE 1990 , t., • c.:11: 'ZCITNIOMO) 4.1(13rAY,3'411/ 3 Tr.. (a,:t thi'611 ,bovorldr,,4 rigV,pact) OCT 1": r• JO . • , • • 11...• ' • ;43 • • *IF ,..*?vv, . • . . • • • • .• • •'`I't . • - ,...• . , ;.A• 8A yea.11""lial."...."11.11.61.111.11111.1.11.11.11111.1.177 C)l AA/7.115 410 June 12, 1990 U. S. Home corporation Vita SILVER STREAli South Florida Division 43 Barclay Circle, Suite 9101 Fort Myers, FL 33907 = 555 PlannedeUnitcel West of Developments-75 for The Vineyards ofd9E-R26Ey Naples Pa Dear Gentlemen: This letter shall act as authorization for U.S. Home Corporation, its agents and specified representatives, and the consulting firms of Anchor Engineering and Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc, , to make application submittals to and receive 41) approvals from the various governmental agencies for the proamendments to the cessing involving the above rreferenced Unit 1propertyor The . Vineyards of Prior to any submittals to any governmental/regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over PUD/DRI amendments by U.s. Home Corporation, its agents or representatives, vineyards Development Corporation, on behalf of the owners of the property,, ust to+ reView And eppr�ve snr,.h submittal ?.nil any pro o existing PUD/DRI affecting the above referenced subject property. If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, VP-7414,6) Michael Procacci President MP/TAL/di j . _. N0. r, , „ ;THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORi'OMT= Nwtis .. ?D Napa Boulevard. Naples, north 33999 (8)3) 353-1551 r i • 1 Q) ,.LtGky iJ' T3t t1038+ s ' rPt.'wY'a. •N t, 04+. ...r,4br nr.'S.►' rk.iwrN•s^:i?71lkr'S 8A , ,. .�.�,.. ..y, .;..�.�,,R. . :'}J11i1. r"-g .9' fir " 11::JM'Orsill • FPI_ .... 11 June 11, 1990 James B. Roberts, P.E. Anchor Engineering 790 Harbour Drive Naples, Florida 33942 RE: Proposed Stoneybrook Estates at the vineyards Dear Er. Roberts: This is to acknowledge the receipt of your drawing dated May 25, 1990 of the proposed S4 ' R.b.W. road crossing with temporary cul de sac and the proposed lake connection pipe crossing of the 235' FPL easement. We will give the utmost consideration to subordination of 235' FPL easement for the 84' R.O.W. road crossing and to a consent agreement for the lake connection pipe crossing, provided these crossings are perpendicular to the FPL easement. To properly and promptly execute your crossing requests, please provide detail drawings of your proposed construction including topographic information. 1111 Also your drawing dated May 25, 1990 shows a portion of a 20' Lake Maintenance Easement in the FPL easement. This use is not permitted in the FPL easement and should be deleted from your development plans. Sincerely. `-320-`4"AP Larry. wicks District Engineer LFW:jb • 01 omulgAmpliimpolq ,fir.. a; . � , , . . :iilur. � �-"•�.,'; • „.APmorwavT7grriallr.. ., ,,,,!t: 8A 4 ‘, 41'''''-f '-j""'"?. ..,/--•„-176"111/1614s' t-t'r.• 4 a . 1 . . ' . , 1• ..i y • • . S 7 ; ' "::'.7.::•..k • , r i! r: . lir ;r . 1:i INVESTIGATION OF SOIL AND • 'z:. ROCK CHARACTER IN THE • • i- = r WESTERN PORTION OF : .....• • ' • : , .:,t ), i '71ES'71VINEYARDS DRI • `'r` ` 1 r,.,r ?v ,b:-'.• : • • • _ ,; ',21 i •.1‘.1t , J 1 . :. 1 . • 1”' ' .. prepued for • • V.S. Home Corporation : , I . 43 Barkley Circle, Suite 101 ;. r� Fort Myers, Florida 33907 , , , October, 1989 by Missimer & Associates, Inc. 428 Pine Island Road, S.W. .. Cape Coral, Florida 33991 • Loyd E. Horvath, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer #25260 State of Florida �..:.:-... Project # E89.200 __;..._... , z A 't '^m7� T . i �: � • � ,�, •ter:.. � ✓. •--•..,.�-.....-.-.• 8A •.hrM+!t "f V*!711Md� �!' !Z"MPI " ''`i"'�7, I►,j. ;M . I. INTRODUCTION • er Associate's Inc. (MOO was authorized by The Missim , Vineyards Development Corporation to^investigati the shallow subsurface geology beneath`Tha `VinsYards projeet'site. Thez : work scope included: 3) RZVisw o= company fileiZfor existinsi information'on the araa, 33 test hole- drilling t6 'assess the site specific shallow giblogy, and 3Yiieparation of a report including all thi p rtinent information and a contour map-::- � showitif the depth to rock. • r j 1 _, PON.) `Ott 3 . y�, ;`a.-r � -,.ii/t:yf J r~ 1 �f� y "•.r s '� ; f i.: .., 'T' ��♦ .. • _ 8A ,-4, 71771 XI. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION An auger type drilling rig was used to penetrate the shallow subsurface beneath The Vineyards project site. Soil borings were placad. at 2$ general locations spanning the site (Figural) . In addition, 13, soil borings were completed to, evaluate potential contamination issues., !►orings were drilled to the top of the first consolidated rock layer. In areas where the rock was vary, thin or absent, borings were terminated at a depth of 25 feet. A geologist!' description of the lithologies encountered is included in the appendix. The depth to rock across the project site ranged from 6 to 15 feet below land surface. A contour map was prepared and it showed the depth to rock generally increased from east • to wast (Figure 2) . The rock unit was absent or consisted of minor lenses in nine of the borings. Figure 3 shows the locations of these borings. 8A T h � , N O N ;1 . ( t O 1t 0 (JAS - -, aIZ ..'. 1 ' 1t NN0 10I vs VI vt co t4 t}k%i § i i i 0 Kt i r n , , 2 q . 90 ii0 iti iji . . zit 0 . , Ire iO , ... 41K. 1. 1 E • • to zy,vaLoN , ,. z 1 • • ; I to a m � 0. g 1 t L .,: -I NO Z t V. C in cv m o I cc _$ m o r tri O ! N -a O tN a '' lif.kali .jrt •1*, VW •:4;e.ig.,4"/ , NC it 4 f \ T• • • { 9 4 , _ VI /4 �a ' . ` •,/".n.- - ,s -.. 1� i • l� tc? t•.• i d .' • Adz ,A• Ne. _.v r r Mi • 1i�,1�x • �•,-e'.: !h u �, � : ' L.:.. Ck ".....:.�kiL..-. ..a:......••r,C."r�...:...:.ia....+l...:+...t .. i: .:..✓� . ..a.. a+11..: 0S►. 8A k 7 . r FP 'I ; to , Cv i ilk >c, ti Z S 'V T; i t' .j I 1 ••I .1 ""'i . ••• ; ;c• (---b I _ 3 vii W0N • ' y `\\ \`\ 0 , , � .',. . , , ,..-. - .: o _ i Oen i • , c.,. ..... ......- s , . • ,... g ck3 1 i ;_,,...., g , - § . ,, '..N �I �l ,\ G m A'•, ail NegraV14/7 p .• 6 04 A��,��A�- f 'i g % • \� QY g 9 glg = se:1 i {1.1 0 g W a Np J O• tIP • i 1 , i b Q . r)0 41 i ...""ts\s, O V b `` I .. z , 4 0 .-. Z rg ,-; ---77 . „..,.-r'veilsi ,, .i , , .1.„,t..A. „, S �„\.:.„..,..s., '' ' . r• i ig. war �• r , va, 0(NA ifria22//), ' { NC. t r• _ a.n• �., ,3.. b "t`' , r•�--. ,.+�..' rtu•-• 3 I Litt 0-3,1. .' 4 a.. r� r ' ,. ,4 I t` iii � i %1 1. • ..Z 8A ... , ..........ma....s..w■Nmrm ! • „ .... .,,,,,.A terictir"' ,1 '••.1 ,1.0 letv , . • t . 1B° it..........9 1 . . . . . . • .1.-. 0 '. •-• cl ii • ,•,) , i.i t--) z • cn g -\ _...._ x 4 . u. OS d 0 - i . 5 _ x tn L7 Z til at g tAl zq Q ).< •g • . 1 1 , ....i e) -J , 0 Cl, Li IP k. —a 0 tli 0 'ZJj • ' — u.1 c4 tar-.{ t ui • 8 OM.... •.......• ...... ...... .. .... .. 15-14/7 i...)1.......•• W IA LI -4 0 I N. .i t.4 •-J • ‘..) - tc . .11 LL)ty•L'U • ffi CC pr . • - ;1 e LJ = I I') 0 0 Z Z Z C.) 3 Li 0 OZ 1 CD P n p w tr) ei 0 6 _J -)1-1•I -J g g ,.. L., .., 0 1.- x L.., ,.., . I rs• k 1 1 .I V) cd 7EM—§ % i ... , HARCII.:1*'. - - r I • 1 . I-' — • X . •. ,. '08 1A100211Y • 0 • . .. . . • . .• • : ocr, , 9(.• I ly.1• „ ., • .4*-- -.,-,ltk,,• -.,. ..ss,,. .'vit.:-- 4 .2.;;:-..1.% ;- •••....... ,,..-. -%., ,,;o - • . -.. . oi „. l• f e ii, el! .• ir...5;,,,,,%ea... , .0 , ., • „,,,..:•,,41.4.,. . .. _ , , .,.. . , , •,.. ...., . ... . ., : . . •.,. ....,... i. . ''''' 4 .. -4,.:.•..,4 1444...Z,... ' *.-- I,. ' — . .--- _ 8A . Ilip., t FORMA'T'ION: I UTHOLOGY1 .AJIF'ER SAND, ...... quartz, — 5 — PAMUCO gray= mown; organics; ;. ' sllghty ;:,:; WATER TABLE 3 cioyey. w .W w 'ww: m -- 1 O IN • PINECREST UMESTONE; - • . ' LIMESTONE 6wa"r cru ti. t z MEMBER • *oily .r,,.-y --15, 1 I _ -s,-C BONiTA MARL&CLAY _"'" CONFINING 5 SPRING r,�c, aus. .. BED R ^20— ~ MARL WHITE TO GRAY. —`— SHELL 0 MEMBER —�"L • • Trevi 4-4 0 .� I.4ISSIMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. M&A K �- 11200 -1• :. `. I ,r • �,tr ' 3EOG;YSTS- EVR0,4 l& w • • I .s • ►� • �; +4, -. '; ENC4.Z�0 GEOLOGYBENEATH ME VINEYARDS SITE. . ; 2,:-3 2".., j'� 'I ! liV tWT A r 4 .. a, _ .__ ._..._ .. _ . .... TEST. _ _ .___.______{ VINEYARDS SOIL i'.. VINEYARDS GEOLOGIST'S LOG OF SOIL BORING 41 4 .. penth (feet) pescriotion 0 - 5 Sand, brown and white, fine, subangular. 0 •tan SineW I. aii oorled. St - 14 Sana, gray a'liS"tar;--f ins; ainor-shell fragmsnta. 14 - 15 f Clay, 4iy, stiff. I Solid ,r (sandy sandy liaestone) at J15 . f t feat, 1110 ____. _ . i • i i 1 I 1 4 • I �S .Ji .23T/uJO2uA_ K3112211 AM M . _ t—.... 0sa-A -.0 .rm, taa - .1041 uv\o4,r,,I -z\z�om% - zvz:,a , � vEt' v , .: y r, �, , ;, 4 :'4..s _7.2 2QRAY3vgV 3H-E xr 1438. Y0QJ030 7i1,1 3 , •Al ,',.,14•7 , `i ;,1 1i� j • a { . ., • • . " , . :4•4,44 . Di. �ur� ls t 1.,:41-1.,:41-,„,";.,�t «r . ,i �. ' $J, - 8A • .•'h.,l•"T",7, C �i { r ' /•�f• •',/ yl.:+rrf,.� ryw,�••aT / �.�.'•'• - •.yR. it y'•'?•/•,\Op. CEOtOCIST�S YAG-Ot'SOIL MORIRG" t3 • d* Depth (fee � ` ' •; Descrivtion o - 7 Si ay fine, subangular. 7 - 13)" Sand•,.tan and gray, fine, minor shell frigmentic:J;- ,A4 1.1 ,, SOlid rook tat 13 fast. • 1. -. •.n 8A r. GEOL•OGIST'S SAG OF,SOIL_BORING, g3 l :,,I:, . Depth Jfeet1 "Ascription"1 �• Saud, . brown and tan, fin., ` ' subangular. f, 5 .-- io: ` ' alny; dtti `,gray to gray, fine n , 10 - 13.5 61aie Iiiicd2' y � ' , gray, line, minor shall. Solid rock at 13.5 feet. . . • 1 • 1 1 3 i 4 • y iii .11." • 1 , . , 1, k 1. . 04- 4, • i I. . A::' , y `- :• . 1 ,:t� ;%. r'•r' w ,•.'4 . ror••«0.. s. �, . 1`Z. . •• 1 .,�.r., I1t ..• •f. , 1 ` . i ot; 03,14, Y w•-:r., , * 2v.tiviiit . .4•40"."."` �� r - ' Lit s ,. •'t r jf _ 8A •, I • • 4. GEOLCG/STIS LOC Or SOIL BORING 14111: 411 • Dep th (feet) Description o – 5 Sandiubrovnlind gray, fine, o subangular, common organics. rti •osup' biles (111 5 — 10, Sand, tan, fine, well sorted. • t 1 • :-, _ - — 10 – 13.5 Sand as above ' '7cSo1idirock. atp13.5 feet. _ . : III • ,repronm......ammetio • • c1.1. .4it te' : 16.Atil)• : f.c'• • . . r e4 c';i.) -..;: ss:• • i• •. ,ocsr,2-4 •• • • " 4• #1. . ' • • '" • • 3 # nrit 4,°"".; • ..41, 'Ai 1",-• Le*Pg.-, • • • • • 8A :. ':.a •• ' m ' ,••'7, ,r , ..; GEOLOGISTtS LOG OP SOIL BORING jS ;• i.!:Ii ,:1 .:.t,? ,, Depth (feetl pescriotion I 0 - 5 Sand, brown-orange-tan, fine; . �."'• r- To�'7n 'elrbt'419111hr: , :jj .1Ga 5 R.7w X117 X 6 c!Te-, 5 - 10 he Sand, tan and 'gray, minor shall. I9 r , , ,ill tcia7 •n? 10 - 12 Sand, tan, fins, rock 2ansa atI'I1� ft'.`, . ,-2 1. "1 -'- • C =Sblid)rock:at?12 fact, • ' jj_ 4 . .. 1144M01.4 .ti.,' AG.S :Fl y-'rM. t ' .:,..k; •;:a.$ '.:1- 1-1.•• wrt. S C .x t h �, � „ r . . a,Z1 , I S 1 ?: ii y1 s 4t,, 8A ,.74t? • "sr.•-!,; • GEOLOGIST' „OF-qoz7#,BORING 6 • Depth (feet Description o — 5 Sandl,,brovm,and tan, fine, . ' 5 — ,, .:1Saiailsr!pos;.ine, minor she11,)1 002.$14,fof.A,p 11 Zest, r - . : ot Xt clJ 1011 • ••-il — 2c - • • • • •Ob ..% • r.L.1)IL ZS" • . • 110 44" • I • :01 • • 41 I t •t, • , 1.• 04(11,i; I I • 6,?e; • , . . ; ;X*, •• ' , , • ,igirAh. .4t • 4, 4. 1.44r•lt .t - ; artelletamminnmy, .411111G7 , . 8A .n. -r. "f!P'4' W,hgt., �f. a w • GEOLOGIST'S LOG OF SOIL BORING 47 Death (testi Descrivtio, r 0 - 5 San�lf;,irhitl.J1knd tan, fine, subingdlar: 5 - ld t CQc , -�,- t., `Saha, lorbf 1°n tine, subangular. 10 - 15 Skid', grad, line, rock lense at 13 feet to 14 feet. e ' 15 - 18 Sand, gray, fine, clayey. 18 - 23 Marl, gray, sandy, occasional shall and limestone. • • t w 1e,r4r t •;ik P .�* Cr, ,, • y. 0'if s 8 A • • 4 ' •V.,,V PI° ' •-• '4!‘ • ,GEOLOGIST!S. LOG OF.5O/L';BORING .0 • Depth (fest) Lk ; DISCribtiOn •". 5 • _11 • : Sand r e;tanl-brown-orange, fine, yell sorted. 5 - 8 - , y f S,and11:17ay,,,,clayey, co=on shall. t -103.34:.roak,akt 0 test. , , C .f•nllictuoz,n4 biiol )v. • • • .'• 21 ,„11,4614 e • , 004(1r•• o..)1 • ' S ,T)0' : I.:, ;i• .r‘ • OC'T 2 •..3, '4 • t, r •:t>. :440, •; •?,4-4ivarfil ;r4. - . - 4.4.144:14.44.41%.44446j4m..440e-r44111.444"4414 , • 8A GEOtAGIST'S VOC'Or SOIL'BORING 49 peuth (feetl 1'Li.31)'I7_"„•, Description S o 5‘'"j : =•• •'-''rsbirdi br6V .branga-tan, fine, wall) . 1," , fn.: c -isortldi subangular. 5 5:6i,3 r.-:1-tc•' {o'tn t'Bafid7rbrotinfl• clayey, fins. 10 - 15 • • 1 ' '1 minor shell, rock lens• at 13 fast. 15 - 20 Sand, gray, fine, clayey, minor shall. 20 - 25 Marl, gray, soft, common shell and limsstpna. No solid rock encountered. • • AGEr�'A��(paj'j�/�,� �■�� 1 t 1 1 LOU, 'r ,1r • /♦.� - •, .,, .� •'� ;• t. , ' �� -' ," ., .. t!0404 .f. .;-..�`+ '444.4' et •• YZ. •t1 •�• 1. r t 1 �+ t}{�+f - '• f��yt _ - .{• iN :41'4, J 8A GEOLOGIST'S WO OF SOLI. $OktIitG ��23' • 1.9.t 1-r' . panth (feat% pale�SiDtiOn 1 0 ,w 5 'Sand I:bsc�wtln,,, . tins, organics. 5 - 9 ;yin to -Sand,�broWn,retina, clayey, minor shall. . . Soli$;rook%,D 9 toot. ,bcte:' vr,, i:1 - • • • ()(14(15 , g. A4 4 • '.#R •+'1 .,�/f ' DIY • ' • ' ti . . „ • i tr- ' 11 ; • }}• ,•� •41,'t;f m. t -ice '�?a ` i:' f 8A --4401,04gor • Itfwe.04.QPIfv,"4/0-,,-'71170eLAI.t"4"14-,. 411/41111PWIlit , GEoLoAxsTAs. LOG .OF SOIL BORING f28 Depth (feet l Description • 1.1(7) , 0 - 5 5.andvyhite7gray, fine, well sorted, "subangulir4- , Avin.ro .1-4L • 1 5 - 10 Sand, DrOWThbrIfi ne, clayey. - 11;h' 10 - 15 Sand gray, , fine, minor shall tratImanti.'' ' 1*.! 15 - 20 Clayey sand, gray, fine, minor shall fragments. 20 - 25 Clayey sand and marl, gray, finely phosphatic, minor shell and limestone. • • 1 . • ft ,Ma. .141421Y, . Orr 211!*7 _ t ' • 44.44 44. •- •:.4 L' , et, Z. '44t: 1414• „g ' 4 I; • °Mirk, , • • . 4 ' • ' • '.•'''=P••• • • '• • 8A 0p.O.e.x 113017,Naples.FL 13$11.7013 c;a7ir,U F1BV: 4 FPL• :. l; May 3, 1990 Anchor Engineering Attu: Mr. Gordon Skrcde 790 Barbour Drive ' , , . , , Naples, FL 33940 .,,,1, Re: The Vineyards ' West Parcel To 11Thora It May Concern: ! ' ,.).-t The Florida Power & Light Company will furnish rnishelelectric tc service uponNeq estd to The Vineyards - West Parcel, located at thecorner of Airport Road Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL. Electric service will be supplied by tha Florida Power & Light Company to the • customer, based on teens and conditions outlined in the General Rules and Regulations for Electric Stroke as approved by the Florida Public Service Commission. . L.J a.• If you have any qussfions,'pltast do not hesitate to contact Gent Hartley at (613) ' 434-1286. Sincerely, 2/1Cl'i:C ---rF1.77)k District General Manager JKF.rsb • . 1 • ,-�: w r �; t Item q OCTA -1<. '27n ar.,h ./1�.{t/Gl..►4..p.pt_ . `•., ,1• f 004( V . J !,{ r -.r: . . 4.- , , fir.. ...orit,„� ♦ .. , w . . 8A • uudh.f.tt it t•',,.1,(„.„ w•i �('� ■ I United $11 Telephone ®II$ m N'64,Syste . United Telephone Company any of Florida Dos 2417•Ntpbt,fbrtda0 i . � • ,f April 23, 1990 I Mr. Richard Skrede i! ,),,...; --- Anchor Engineering 790 Harbour Drive Maples, Florida 33940 , RE: The Vineyards — West Parcel . Section 1, Township 495 Range 25E, Collier County Dear Mr. Skreda: i In response to your letter dated April 17, 1990, this is to advise that United Telephone Company of Florida will provide service, upon request, to the' above referenced property. Telephone service will be provided based on the .rulet and regulations • covered in our Local and General Exchange Tariff, approved and on file with the Florida Public Service Commission. United Telephone Company will require telephone'.eassments end/or entrance conduits to serve the new building units. In addition, . the following criteria must be met sixty (60) days prior to install- ation of telephone facilities: 1 . A minimum seven foot easement along the cable `' route to be provided by developer. 2. Entrance conduits and road crossings placed by the developer at locations indicated by United Telephone Company of Florida's representatives. Conduit markers to be provided by United Telephone. 3. The buried 'cable route must be cleared of trees, stumps, and other obstructions. 4 . The cable route must be filled or cut to within six inches of final grade and y►ode stakes set. rj(�l,u. E :�1: , ot Item q OCT 2 y . ea$1 *I hr 111, ,4 :6-6 r .4-1.1f:/' - - :` . 004t►� ` '_' i 8A � _rte 11 iii :'tir. , . �y..,��...ry-�,.-•'�„�7. .,T,yl, •r+ .•-• ,.}� . .. • Page o April 23, 1090 Mr. Richard Skrede 5. Where applicable, property corners shall be ,'Jr staked. 6. All flooded areas shall be drained. 7 . All subsurface facilities shall be staked within two feet of their location along the cable route. Stakes are marked with depth, �' r';:,t ' size, and type of facility. Abttlt'tPlease furnish us with a building schedule and preliminary plat when available. ( •)tn'I 241%, Abtn.,,,ty .;; If you should require any additional information, .or 'iOfLteeqtly? "' ' conflicts with our proposed facilities, please contict'xr. )tobirt' ' weaver at (813) 263-6210. Sincerely, • c4✓ George A. Adams ' ;'" c:; , Engineering Manager r::, , r • GAA:RTA/mw cct R. T. Mico R. L. Weaver • r z • 004(),� ( item q W` r•rl ; .J " '`4 1 .y',, ,.. •.{ , S 1.OCT 21.1-,. SRL. r '. 8A 11 v ao • - IP• re • :=0D24cm. . # 5...ss , iip, 1 mrie " ......_ u1, ia "4 ....1 :t01 Temet Reud fi‘ G . fill'IL\- NJpirt, florit1.1 ,.... . 4......101F.4, 11 Tcicphors.(a13)793.960:1 Telecnitirr;ft I )19).117 April 25, 1990 , : , .. . - ....... $ , _. .. ..<, , 1 , • ,,,4,.; , 1 1 , I • ,.. , Xr. Cordon Skrade Anchor Engineering 790 Harbour Drive Naples, Florida 33940 ; ! i 1.> - t ! t4 ' 1 ; 17,21 na3sIN RE: The Vineyards West Parcel . i:d...AtAvl (Ildw Section. 1,,Townehip .49 South, Rinse 25 tasty Collier County, Florida' , , t Dear Xr. Skreda: Palmer Cablevision can provide its services to the above referenced development. • ...... • $r .. -y If I cam be of any additional assistance to you regarding this project, 1) k k, I C. please do not hesitate to call me at 793-9620, I Sincerely, / Pfni111-.4.4."....... Nestor M. arti • i Construction Manager cc: Kevin Sweeney Dave Wolfley • - ' I . . — • ,......)..t,„1,Lt •.A •,„, ,. . tl,,,,, , . 004.1,0 I •4 i. ‘ .. ,....r........? .*- ...d :r. '. , ..... . . .7:11 ''''''''- . V4411.4e441'1:1' . - '' ." '''. • . i . i 8A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT UTILITIES DIVISION 2600 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES NAPLES,Fl.33942 (813)643.8480 A CER71nco BLUE CHIP CoMMUNRY May 3, 1990 Mr. Gordon Skrede Anchor Engineering 790 Harbour Driva Naples, FL 33940 Re: North Service Area - Vineyards West Parcel South Side Vanderbilt Beach Road between Airport Rd. and Livingston Road Dear Mr. Skrede: -" This is in response to your recent letter regarding the availability of potable water and sanitary sewer service for the above-referenced project. The letter specifically addressed the need to obtain a response regarding the Collier County Water-sewer District's ability to provide potable water and sanitary sewer service to the referenced iproject. Be advised that water facilities of the District are located adjacent to your proposed project in the rights-of-wey of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Road. These facilities must be extended and looped throughout the project to serve each lot to ultimately provide the needed utility services for the development. The propertyowner shall e responsib the construction cost of tth. wrfacilitiesfrom thaDistrict'sfaciliesto and • within the subject project. Be advised that at this time, the County Central Sewer Facilities are not available to serve the property in question. There are on-going efforts to coordinate a developer installed and funded wastewater transmission main along Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive that will discharge to the County's North Wastewater Treatment facility project. When these sewer facilities are available, they must be extended to the property and connection nada, pursuant to the Utilities stipulations prepared for this project and/or other County requirements. If the project proceeds in advance of the availability of County sewer service, the property owner will be responsible for providing an interim means of on-site sewage treatment and disposal until the District can provide sewer service to the project. The property owner shall be responsible for the construction and cost of all '-lterim on-site and permanent on-site and off-site sewer facilities from the District's facilities to and within the subject project. _ _ 1 Item q tro. -kW) OCT 2 J 2 or . (NA I a P&� 8A ) r. George Skrede ) ay 3, 1990 41 Page 2 At this time, the County Water-Sewer District will not be in a position to make a comsaitmant to provide water and/or sewer service to the subject property because it is the District's policy to provide this service on a "first-come, first-serve" basis. Therefore, we cannot provide a commitment to serve, to any project, until: 1) Water, of adequate volume and pressure, andreSewage e treattreatment and disposal facilities of adequate capacity P available to the area. 2) Construction documents for the proposed project are submitted and approved. 3) An application for service is approved. 4) All applicable system development and connection charges and fees established by ordinance and in effect at the time that development occurs are paid. The District will be making phased expansions to the water supply, treatment and transmission facilities and sewage transmission, treatment and disposal facilities servicing the area in question and 411 other areas of the County, based on demands within the system and other binding commitments. These expansions should provide• sufficient capacity to supply the referenced property's anticipated potable water and sewage treatment and disposal demands and the remainder of the District's committed capacity. However, no guarantee can be issued that other developments throughout the District will not impact on the' quantity of potable water and sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until each phase has received a commitment for service. Connections are also subject to the availability of water and sever capacity at the time formal application is received. Should water supply .or sewage • • treatment and disposal capacity not be available, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means of water supply and • treatment and sewage treatment and disposal until the Districts facilities have the adequate capacity to serve the project. I trust the foregoing clearly describes the District's policies and procedures with 'regard .to the availability of potable water and sanitary sewer services for this project. -r cvj Na • f 007 2 3 90 it `,4i 21 (e.? 8A • Mr. George &krede May 3, 1990 Page 3 If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, '/:::/ C. W. Temby, P.E. Utilities Engineering Director cWTt amk Oct Project Review Services Michael X. Arnold, Vti1iti*sv'acdninistrator — ' Fred Blostscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator Michael Newman, Water Director Tim Clemons, Wastewater Director • :11161T (^ it tom � k. u� �' »� • rf%_.„ 'i a r r} .rte ,�' � 4 '• r ��;�n .�•!� •P."‘•. -6" •.' - 1•• + C�-'}��,ret,' '1.�,• 8A •, • E • ..:, aae7Iq ,cvcd :ci pn Z(; .:; . c ,-.; t . :., , ; ;'• � )tZ . ‘ , 1t .t Rn'! , ; ,-kto-.x1 :a, (1511. iX Traffic Analysis • Traffic Analysis Item t Accr:c, r, Na ,41.. o - - 8A . . 41 1.3TA rsO2P./.. IT/7, r. .• . �.1i . BARRI I) ES) CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS W.SAM,P1.,PRESIDENT tIos HAYS mw 1 . DUNLOP;)R.,PE.,SENIOR V10E PRESIDENT POST OFt1C2110x(554$ TALLAHASSEE.FLOA)M 32301 June 15; 1990 (984)224.11x1 Mr. Frank Dolan U.S. Home Corporation \ . P M IT �' 43 Barkley Circle 1' Suite 101 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 SUN 18 tgal { .. Dear Frank: IL." v fr.a a a. i,----.------ H Re: Traffic impact studies for U.S. Home , subdivisions at The Vineyards Enclosed are the traffic •impact studies based on the two , , I. Subdivision Master Plant (SHP!a) Lovering your property along Vanderbilt Beach Road between 1-75 and Airport Rohl, namely - `' Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards (the westerly parcel) and , . . Stoneybrook Golf end Country Club at The Vineyards (the easterly parcel) . r ' • These analyses resulted in estimates of the external traffic • generated by each of these SMP areas, distributed onto the arterial roads. The reports reflect the existing traffic volumes . 410on the impacted roads, their volumes projected to 1996, end their present and projected levels of service. The reports point out that, although this western part of The Vineyards DRI is proposed to be developed earlier than was • originally expected, the parts east of I-75 are developing later • than was originally expected. Further, the statement is made . that the total impacts of the whole DRI, phase by phase, will lie no greater than those originally expected , and that this will become evident upon review of the traffic impact study we are now doing for The Vineyards. As you know, this comprehensive study is addressing all parts of The Vineyards DRI area, both east and west of I-7S. We will remain available to respond. to any questions about our studies which you or the County reviewers may have. • Your 7 truly , ,:,`;,,, . , i 0 r,; ;,.r, , n W. Bair, P.E. ,t Enclosuur�rei •, '0 ,' ") • cc: A'( ; Jim B. Roberts w/enc1. - L�, rut ' til ,. 411 cc: Harry Benoit x/$ Cl. ^, Na, C0) j, a T,0 • I ' . ,i , • 3 y..*. • � 2 9Cy: uRdAN •RLO,ot4AL rtANNINO•TRANSIT•HICHRIAY LCCATION A MOH 'At S Stat • , s .flASI$flJrl PeACT AND NUDS IVJOILs a PAPJNO I TM= MUM j0 ,R,, - -......---a.........—.. - . .1'' r• • r* I ♦ , ..t,ort,"„wt • .. 8A • BARR, DUNLOP &. ASSOCIATES, INC. . .l'/' CQtisval octIon ss At'?a!•trI imps f '+ ( r ,F J , June 15, 1990 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 4 STONEYBROOX ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS _....___ ' INTRODUCTION :1 : The Vineyards DRI is locaied sotith. of Vanderbilt Beach Road, east and west of 1-75. This is an• approved DRI with a Development Order issued May 7, 1985 and amended October 22, 1985. Phases to be completed by 1996 -included construction of 4, 194 dwelling units and 210,000 Sq. ft: of commercial area. At buildout the development vas approved for '6.978 duelling units and 460,000 • aq.i ri ft. of commercial area. Since the Development Order was issued, ; , , , changes in overall development plans have made it necessary to analyze the impacts of individual subdivision master plans. The Vineyards DRI hii nov been divided into developments consisting of Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards and Stoneybrook Golf and Country Club (both west of I-75) . and The Vineyards (east of I-75) . Figure 1 represents the location of these developments, , This analysis is prepared for Stoneybrook Lstetes at The Vineyards, which encompasses en area of approximately 197 acres, ' • It should be noted that the individual development plans for these subdivisions have been designed to keep the entire DRI within the traffic impacts by phase which were the basis for the original development order, although the configuration of the land uses (on the east versus the west side of 1-75) have been adjusted. Although the, western portion of the Vineyards DRI is expected to be developed earlier than originally expected (west of I-75) , some eastern portions' vill be developed later than .. - originally plfnned. Therefore, the impacts, phase by phase, will be no greater than those originally expected. r1 1,131. .1 Jton3a rain( .....,3 • eriar 1iiDtion1 {Turs.Ad•r . 0440w...A JAAX01 ` 0.44:1C rtwOI L J id =aim tn1H Qs1A ,:Aqu {�� • " . 8A /:.• ----.--- .0141 alTA.IDOPPA :-2 '10.171: CI ,5tStAti {' ;r . ' i ..I,t . ' •.7 .. : • , r Y .Fjgure.,1 . SITE LOCATION MAP Legend ` . , I, :i . I_*tonaytueok iitataa at T?a V;nayt,ItID •teneyfrnek Oilt 1 Country Cue • r r., The Vlney$tdi'tt e1 -1I '"•' 7 f r • . 1111r N \/ , , , . . , . 2 p Frtlle F , w • IrTmokelsle Rd. 11401 - ca, \ 11 Vanderbilt Beach Rd. t • 41 �`.;err, f s, • •;.ji//j; Pirie"ptdpe Re 4 . . r , tSaQ ( I.tnII • .if. .,` ti it! )rJ ra8, - ' }: ( .m.q) zt+oK. >ta�!t.` . r. S Tily ,MAILevr+to�1,'J A..j,r' *t,L* f 'f 1 . 7 t+Y ip i i', tw, T ..r ....----7-:.__ : +w -:, i.w:.YJr .z,�_: ZA Ll3,--.,f:Al..+ ✓ 7.u.4..,SF• ...-.,c; 8A BARB, DUNLOP & ASSOCIATES, INC. COMe1J171NO CNOUNUZJ AND MAMMAS It should be noted that Stoneybrook Estates at The Vineyards anticipates an expansion of commercial after 1996, again within the overall schedule of DRI developmeltts. , I-, TRIP GENERATION . Table 1 presents the trip generation variables and trip ends by land use which vera used in this analysis. It is assumed that the development units listed herein will be completed and occupied by 1996. ). Estimates are made for average daily and peak-hour volumes generated in the peak season, using 100% occupancy rates for all land uses in the site. `' i! i TA L8 1 4 ' PROJECTED SITi.GENERATED TRAFFIC x TRIP ENDS GENERATED ' LAND USE 'UNITS Daily Peak Hour. t. All il Single Family 320 dwelSings 3.048 324 Multi-Family 430 dve inga , 2, 194 213 Commercial 40,000 1 f. 4,096 38 Total 9,338 924 The equations used to estimate trip generation in this analysis are recommended in the ITE publication Ttin Generation, 4th Edition, 1987. These equations are as 'follows: For Single Family: E , �; Daily LQ'(T) • .94 Ln(x) ;+ 2.60 Peak Hour (p.m.) Lri(T) • .94 Ln(x) 40.36 k • t. � i i ttt �i ) For Multi-Family (Rasid*nt al Condominiu Daily \ ► "(T) • .84 Ln(x) `+ .2:60 r 0.27 Peak Hour (p.m.) (T) • ..84 Ln( )�c �o�: "l..f1;rr*ArY1 ,t � _ «R• Ns. ,� 4ir, T `2.4 c. .it _�,;' "'r + d,,, < �pp 1 •`+ i•. lief. •Litlii *, ii� na`� i ' .• `x•.�. 1. '' .., Tit:SMS .,, '� v y1� • ,.....a,..�'.,,. 1.`;t Wfiri;*U4.. ... t .117.1..x/... . ...___ ,. ....� 8A , . t ^ r. '� • , BARR, DUNLOP & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING WQuvraxs MD rumnats ' ., For Commercial (Shopping Center): ' IIIP DailyLa(T)a• .b5'�f,n�x) + 5.92 Peak Hour (p,m )i' l,n(.T) r'�re:51z/L"w Jti4r041(x ::1 Where: T - Vehicle Trip Ends ' I - Independent Variable (1,000 square feet, dwelling --- units) %. In estimating the internal/external split for the de>!elopment it was aasumedthat 10 percent of the residential trips (trip productionaj. ars kept internal by on-site shopping facilities. Internal/external split o1411 trips (residential and commercial) ' was term to be A's fal,lovs t Total Trip Ends Internal Trips External Trip Ends Deily Peak kilt ZIA Deily Peak 9,338 924 524 54 8,290 816 i EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS s..,...r., . Z...1....;.:... . Figure 2 shows the existing Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT); Peak Season Daily Traffic (PSDT). Figure 3 presents the existing Level of Service (LOS) D service volume and the peak season Level of Service (LOS) within the impact eras. The LOS is based on existing counts factored to peak season and generalized service volume tables (based on the 1985 Hiehwsy CapSCity Manual). The existing AADT volumes were obtained from Collier County. The peak season adjustment factor utilised was 1.20, based on counts taken in the area. • TRIP ASSIGNMENT l•q•rA Ci'CD 110 Thefrtr.stfjc1Rener:ated by the idSXSl,9pasgtsrxt>hAPsggijot;e;th6+ . ' AG:N tr ., ' roadway network within the primary impact area using ,,a menu �l t+a aasign>��tat� procedure. The rats used to estimate pass-by tr ps 2 ' .�Q, '' .. . ., ^. -........... dn.►L.I�..srr+.L.lsa:►thatMC.,.. ....-..•:�.... ea ------ .D I .?..3TAYi02/ ^r) ( f,1, P)I ',1n�.)arr•k RPj Figure 2 EXISTING `TRAFFIC VOLUMES x11.11 , 11,1 .,10 / . 90 ' _ \ 6 V ' • f, ,.. : ltr ; r ' 1 i , 1 1 1K-• ! 7 0 1 , 0 1 2 milts • : ; IntlnIJinil ' 2).300 ,1 r.i 1 (11,200) 0 11400 . . ti ^1 C, (17,100) j -4 Y„rnokatte Rd, �, J �.: ,7 10,130 11,130 (+1,100) (2),700) 11,100 O ' (20,210) iNL • Vendarbii) Basch Rd, 1 rn gMal ..,1 - oT O ) 21,130 0,>1Ot� .121),1101 .123,100) 1,100 1030 b i ( 1,m? /.1.1,000) '�(fi, 22) 1 i2?) PinA d-• Rd. 1' 11, 30 .172,22•) 05.311017 . _ 10,000 22,200 Mom) OI LI au4 \ba g • LEGEND 0000 average annual dilly traffic (0000) peak season dally traffic AAD '(Sounti Sourer 574:; ` Carer'colAtt Vsniig34fa1lbh tFidbi;1989• J •t 1 b 9 ,,., u. . ,.„_.._` - •-^ I:;*, �. �... Lona= a catty 8.74 331*1! ,iic,=ttrt o,(1 ntitJtx )tzt)v1,n ~la •,00 :-r •,.t. S �agfp,A4-.taaq * afp1>f 41bsau •Jnz o,ST , J7ubn007tj .111011:2aiidg0't u . ......... .�._.....-... ..r._..._.. _ _.. ... _ .....J�Jia v(' . • lam. yY 1 8A • '.. 7vj ,?3-ri,m r-)7,y,', .', 1 ' I(► .1-I ST '.rt . . q.. .1; 8A • BARB, DUNLOP & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND MANNERS capture was taken from the ITE publication Trip Generation, 4th Edition, 1987. The rate is calculated as #ollowss 11I, , 1 x . te .'ilciJ.1aNlip ,2; :i .--:,' „) . ; . , ..„ ,, Where g 2atki'l 0:0 '(3;7f` housands. of a.f. ?I ' and O 'iio2 to '2VOJ r. .ii`-1r�', ': '_�7 Percent - Pass—by of external shopping' trip1 Based on this equation, 44.2 percent of external retail trips were subtracted from all links with access to the commercial area. The resulting daily site traffic and total traffic, peak season and avenge annual daily raffic volumes, assigned to each link are shown in Figure 4. Th% impact area covers all links , f` identified in The Vineyards Devllopment Order as potentially , being significantly impacted by the whole DRI (of which this development is a part) . Factors considered in assigning the site—generated trips to the ,- highway system include the following: o Knowledge of the area; o Recant• turning movements at the major nearby intersections; o Existing known short—term development plans; o Typical characteristics of trip distribution. BACKGROUND AND FUTURE TRAFFIC Total traffic volumes (PSDTIand AADT) projected to be on the roadway system in 1996 are shown, along with site traffic and peak season levels og service, in Figure 4. Projected AADT volumes for 1995 were obtained from Collier County. These volumes were extrapolated to 1996 by ',aasiuming tht .same percentage growth the County projections had from 1994 to 1995. This projected traffic v;Ip added to the site; traffic £tom this ,(Smielnpment and estimated site traffic from the adjacent . A ;,r .l�`.lZ.I!,!,.1.2.91?-A....-!.�Uu••+MH• r. ..: /{ , SNa ' , A*AOtw ` Va 2ryL : 01114 . s i � M � ,, +t Kt q . . � •�' r; �$ ' Y .:..k,-: k, {fr., .y .. � Is ',,,t1.1.''' ' j r_".".C_......*". , _.. _.. � .... � ce � :... ... 8 A. _PT'!" ,PAID l ? aJ,. t ,1 ,•- itr `ii.517 jf �� . Figur.e 4 PROJECTED TRAFFIC 1996 I 1 fi n ' ; J. !Z 1 -' , ...5 (5 1 . i , r ,55 1 ` t ® N,jj., 0 1 t lat t)v)v . t)l(i.11 1 Mere) /.'IV 11,411 (1.+1;) 9 4 p / trYnokalee Rd, ' ? -n p• t'ti 'r1) —'t/;:iu{ 14,S ` •, 111!"11 tillni 110:11 .....ieftd... etaq Rd. 3. tllitit ''t `" ` IM alIt.».j 131., 43 g grime 1131 Iii 4. n 1 "(161 1 IV A 0 1 1 leir4r. .+.+1 t;1li 8A BARR, DUNLOP & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND r1ANr4FRS Stoneybrook Golf and Country Club to obtain total traffic on the roadway. OL HAFI'F 031 J:: . ( ): i 411 LEVEL OF SERVICE AHD IMPACT ANALYSIS'.! )r Future levels of service, as depicted in Figure 4, were determined based 'oncomparison of projected peak season daily traffic to service volumes oa roadways. Service volumes on r roadways with committed/funded improvements scheduled for completion prior to 1996 (the completion date for ,the1'proposed development) jwere adjusted tb reflect the improved"aerviee volume. The proposed or planned County roadway impittvsments ' , i located within the impact area Ara as follows: • Year of • Segment 1morOvement Imorovemett Livingston Road: C.R. 8461; New 2L 1990 , to Imperial & E.W. Connector Coodletta Frank Roadt Caries Road New 2L 1990-91 to C.R. 846 Immokalee Road: U.S. 41 - 1-75 +2L 1990-91 • Pine Ridge Roadt U.B. 41 • C416 . 31 +2L 1990-91 Vanderbilt Beach Road: U.S. Altai— New 2L 1991-92 C.R. 31 C.R. 951 : Golden Cate Blvd - C.R. 846 +2L 1991-92 Imeokalee Rd. : 1-75 - CR 951 +2L 1993-94 .a w :Alt.It ti;e'i own, 1�0 )vs �+'+�.if ,,. `'ciTr �.. "1i N11.14,R t4ea., o1:tS1,4 sus rib ,"1 5i : S �:, '�•�: `•' 01, 2 3 90 • Iia C 110 .�.1r'�+v,t '1�, �,�r.t.....:::!:...c!:.., r , II. l;421} ' .h••,CL-=.,.'�'s �'' , .! 8A nI 1 at nnJ; RESOLUTION N0. 90- . RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER SMP-90-2a FOR SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR STOHEYBROOX ESTATES AT THE VINEYARDS ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. MUMS, the Legislature of the state of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes has conferred on Collier County, the power to establish, coordinate and enforce, zoning, building, housing —— - and related technical codes and regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WNiRLAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Subdivision Ordinance (Ordinance 7i-4) establishing such regulations; and WNt7tLAS, the Collier County Planning Cossission being the duly appointed and constituted authority for the review and approval of subdivision *aster plans, has held a public' hearing after due notice and has considered the advisability of Subdivision Master Plan approval for the property hereinafter S described and has found that satisfactory provision and arrange.* sent has been sade concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations end in accordance with Article IX, section 7, thereof, and has recommended approval of said Subdivision Xaster Plan; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity • to be heard by this board in public seating assembled and the Board having considered all matters prea'nted. NOW, THEREFORE, Bt IT RESOLVED SY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Collier County, Florida, that the petition filed by James B. Roberts of Anchor Engineering Consultants, Inc., representing Prooaoci Brothers sales Corporation, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: ExIIBIT •A• 4111 iK J� 00425 OCT :2 3 90 0:"°•.E. ' r * ' , `,' , Jv'-.�.•4!.'\r .►-4.....-.-•.jar�....I-- _-.1. ....r.�•- - - n '.l1 M.rw..'l..M�+..a./5....�.r.. . _ 8A w�. be and the sem• for which the Subdivision Master Plan is hereby approved subject to:th* following conditions: m[IDIT "a" • DL IT TJRTHIR RIUOLVID that this Resolution be recorded in /the minutes of•the Board et County Cosaissioners. • =,v CosajNioner'•nc . err: offered the .c ' foregoing•Resolntisrt and•aowd for its adoption, seconded by commissional', ', and upon roll call, the vote vast AYH* MAYS! ASSENT AND•MOT.VvoT2lear ABSTENTION! • ' ' Done this day of , lffo. 4110 DAVID! ATT=UTt SOARD 0? COUNTY COMNISIIONIRi DAMES C. CILES, CLE COLLI LR ccuwTY, FLORIDA BYr SAX A. MAASE, JR., CHAIRXAlt Approved as t4 fora and legal suffioienoys ,�4y�Act kar w oris H. itudant As.isfant County Attorney SMP-l'0-3s Resolutioh • nb/3II • • •�� s} .cit - 4;:""..1.14b‘ • • .1.D0,- if-45!.C"? it 8A v„1„. ,h• ,. .. ..t�,' .i-'�`'r"• •o.'+'►Csi.�.441a -, • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • A PARCEL OF ,LAND, tOCATED' IN;THE NORTH 17Z, OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP • 49 SOUTH, RANGE"25; 'EAkT,'COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY,:DESCR4$ , !18 rOLLOW t i ' ' r ► ; ,.r., COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 ' 44 ' 21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 100.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY MINE OF VANDERBILT BERCH ROAD (150' WIDE) AND BEING THE POINT Or •REOINN`TNG'bF 'THVHEEttI)4 DESCRIBED PARCEL"' OF LAND; THENCE. ,CONTINUIWG'iSOUTN'., 89''' 44,—/11,'21" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OP'- (AY ' LINE,A„ I8T1NCt, OF 3542.36 '' FEST' TO - THE ' • NORTHEAIT CORNER, OY TH 'A(ORTHWEET 1/4 of SATO SECTION 1/ THENCE SOUTH 89 44'.,•g6", $AB ,, ALONG,SQ . K.CANER 1A DISTA210E OF 2861.55 .FEET. !TO .THE., NoRTHXAST NER OF" SAID SECTI0 LINE '11 *THENCESOUTH 02 '„122,'1 041!"� ;,:EAST,. .�, ;MANGE �F_ 158i.52 FE34' TO' 'THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF 1'HE 'NORTHEAST 1'/4 OF '' SAID SECTION 1; THENCE NORTH 09 43' 47" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2139.31` FEET TO THE rSOUTH/DST,(,,CORNERt QF,,.,T ,r ,NQRT `1/2,�QF,' THE,, NORTHEAST, 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE NORTM, SS Vit, 57 ,, }1ES1`,;;,A' DISTANCE OF 2558 .92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST SIDE OF A 100 FEET CANAL RIGHT—OF—WAY AND ,BEING •0.00..FBET EAJT.OF ! THE HEST LINE OF, SAID SECTION 1; 'THENCE NORTH .02' 34',?511, VEST. ; ALONG.SAID CANAL RIGHT— OF—WAY A DISTANCE I0? 1590.04 ,l'EZT.,;TO THS.,POINT OF BEGINNING. fp CONTAINING 196.69ACRES/MORE OR. LESS. • i 1 to;) ,iJ ,'a e)znf.EXHIBIT ?A' ,, '.• , c►ri4 ''r.l Zob r. ► • Its...„ • lid" .11c1L4:i3 . ,:ilfr.4r,4$4,41 • . • 0044.1Ll• ••• • • >' �-•4•. .c.KNE.s .E....:_�_. _... _.r w.Mi..�....r:.sti S:'..a`r..�;�:5 _ ..St. .. _ 8A N - AGREEMENT I , James B. Roberts of Anchor Engineering, representing 111 the Vineyards Development Corporation (U.S. Home Corporation) , as owner or authorized' agent for rrPetition SMP-90-28, agree to the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in their public hearing on October 4, 1990. A planning: 1 . After the final-1 subdivision-plat has been approved by -- - Project Review •$ervioesthsl applicant's professional engineer shall submits -a :computer disk containing the • drawing file in Auto CARD .software format, or a 'similar format, which ii .translatabla. to,Auto .CADD and acceptable to thDevelopment• 'BerVicie ' Director' or alternatively, the applicant may ,submit ..a dimensionally stable 1"•lOO' plat .containing 'all. dimensions otherwise suitable for digitisation. 2 . Silver . Boulevard .Sh$11` x- '•dtipnScted to Livingston Road, when Livingston Rosd, is ip}srowd. 3. The petitioner shall build a sidewalk parallel to Vanderbilt Beach Road, from ' Airport Pulling Road to Livingston Road. The determination of whether the sidewalk shall be on the north or south side shall be made prior to Phase I, final construction plan approval. This determination shall be made by Transportation Services. Any impact fee credits allowed by Ordinance, due the applicant, must be worked out with Transportation Services. jgine ring: 1. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Project Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Project Review Services. 2 . Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Subdivision Regulations with the exception of those granted in the PUD document. 3 . Work within collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of Collier County Right-of-Way Ordinance No. 82-91. 4 . The project shall be platted in accordance with Collier County Subdivision Regulations to define the right-of-way, ( - Exhibit NB" Wit' ' Y ) , • 8A • tracts, lots and easements, as shown on the master plan. Any further subdivision .of the tracts shall be required to go through the SMP proce% . .' 5. The main. entrance zoad,on Yande,;bl�lt ,Beach Road shall have a minimum of 'a 100 ft. tan4ent to allow for adequate stacking,,and7 site distance. , ; 6. The existing northerly 30, foot drainage easpmont shall be designated as follows: . The ,northerly 20 feet of this easement shall be identified as a drainage easement, and the southerly 10 feet.,of .this, easement shall be identified as a drainage/buffer oasotagnt. •7 . The main spine road sha�Ile[ils sidewalks on both sides and all cul-de-sacs .greater�� pn,3004 shall have sidewalks on one iid�'''of thi road. .,,,1 ; ,, • j 8 . The ' ti�:st phase of r fiivelopinsnt. shall include the dedication of the future Livingston Road right-of-way as pert of the plat. 9. Crosswalks shall be provided at all appropriate intersections or where .deemsd .necessary by Project Review Services. •ytilitiest 1. Connection to tha'watir,ma�h withiWVanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way is required 'end.. mutb be fully illuatrated .an the ' final site plan 'and supporting engineering construction drawings. This shall be accomplished by extending a 16" main along future Livingston Road. 2 . This project in conjunction with the project to the east shall extend a force main west to Airport Road along Vanderbilt , Beach Road, south the Orange Blossom Drive along Airport Road for connection to the existing County sewer facilities subject to agreements with the County ‘.1 III Utilities Division. ., c� 0042V, . 4 -�,l'•.3 ty, , '1 8A Water Manaaement: 1. Detailed paving, grading, and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Project Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Project Review Services. 2 . In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, (SFWMD) Chapters 40E4 and 40E-40, this -project shall be designed for a storm event of 2-day duration and 2S-year return frequency. 3 . Deaigh and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Subdivision Regulations. 4 . An Excavation Perriit will be required for the proposed lake(*) in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-26 and SFWMD rules. All lakes shall meet the minimum setbabk .and/or width requirements. 5. A copy of SFWMD Permit or Early Work Permit is required prior to construction plan approval. 6. Landscaping or any other encroachments shall not be placed within the water management areas unless specifically approved by Project Review Services. 7. Prior to final construction plan approval provide a copy of the South Florida Water Management District, right-of-way permit allowing this project to discharge to their right-of-way. 8. This project shall make provisions for all off-site runoff presently discharging to the property. 9. Provide a 20 ft. maintenance easement around all lake perimeters and a 20 ft. access easement to all maintenance easements from public road. 10. The discharge rate shall be limited to 0.06 cfs/acre which is consistent with the D•2 Canal drainage study. 11. All commercial parcels shall provide 0.5" dry pretreatment prior to discharge to the master drainage system. Na.'i co OC1 2 3 90 110 & 1 t E.'% 72 4K. 00430 { •, ... ,X. .. ? ' f.;ma6 0k .haw. •t�,- bget. �• .... -...�..:•..��:Y-• .-rr '•,WA- i. I: .+ti``'1�•. •. • ..'7•' 'Jl'w✓ �i..rwaSsS�1....✓.ti. po.r vyopilisporgiopritomer yy yuolx 8 A • • PYTI1ONER OR AGENT ttEPREST TIV FOR CCPC • SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THI8 ,S• DAY OF It.. � ' r , 1990. NOTARY_ SEAL wurNif tN mumicst?Art QRd10A loco nom is AUG 22 ool* MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: arek SMP-90-28 AGREEMENT SKEET • rnd • , x2390 =� :{ „ r .•t UCA►31 pg. ,o. • r . . .. ', 1 to. �a Ly�r�. x r .•.� III. ti. 8A ' October 23, 1990*;,, ..4.,.4 � ., !'Zte t 1603 RESOLUTION 90-503 RE PETITION SMP-90-28, JAMES B. ROBERTS OF ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., REPRESENTING THE VINEYARDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND U.S. HOME CORPORATION, REQUESTING SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN APPROVAL FOR 'STONEYBROOK ESTATES" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN TEE VINEYARDS PUD - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT SHEET ' Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on i• vrj. October 7, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with • ,,. ,f."0 ; the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SMP-90-28, r:'":,--: filed ir Ir'r ;,.. ti, -' tiled by James B. Roberts of Anchor Engineering Consultants, Inc. , ,.:.,,, -" represeniing The Vineyards Development Corporation and U.S. Home rp Corporation, requesting Subdivision Master Plan approval for *b ' Stoneybrook Estates at the Vineyards, located in the North 1/2 of 4 Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, Li:4`' containing 196.69 acres, more or less. :may 'rk''�•.. Planner Milk presented Petition SMP-90-28, stating this sub- 'i,I'll'.. t'`' -It,' division consists of 275 single-family home sites, two multi-family +',.1 tracts and a 5.91 acre commercial tract. He reported current zoning :'•Y � is PUD/DRI and is undeveloped. He stated the subject property is "`•,'' within the urban residential area on the Future Land Use Map and is fi;1 • consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management C,.3• Plan. He added that, due to the vested status of the Vineyards •' .-: PUD/DRI, the 5.91 acres of commercial property is deemed consistent �`�* with the Growth Management Plan. He concluded that Staff and all . '.;` appropriate County agencies have reviewed this petition and recommend I; approval, subject to the conditions listed in the Agreement Sheet. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Ken Baginski, Planning Services .�4. Manager, replied that with the additional stipulations contained t.:7-r,17;1. within the Agreement Sheet, Staff has indicated water and sewer capa- . y t '' ,,cities are adequate. ,T'y Commissioner Volpe commented that with approval of this A, '.' Subdivision Master Flan and the petition for Stoneybrook Golf and Country Club, there will be an additional 528 single-family units which will be phased in by the year 2000. He asked if all appropriate V". agencies have considered these 1n relation to the timing of when the 4t, • ® 000 ME 21 tt EXHIBIT Page 9 4. 1 L 4r,..-/:f, P: t 8A t October 23, 1990 t'r new County water and sewer facilities will be in place? t <' • Planner Milk stated that every available agency has reviewed this i':,i'. �. project, and the Vineyards projects coordinator has met many times 1",).;._ rwith County Staff to ensure that adequate rights-of-way, utilities, •2::. water lines and hook-ups are available for each project. .sir Commissioner Volpe asked if this project was ever proposed to have ,4t': i,:` an on-site treatment plant? Michael Saadeh, representing The Vineyards Development Corporation ; ,e, and U.S. Homes Corporation, replied that the Vineyards built a water r,:.4 K•t; • treatment plant on an interim basis until the County could provide ';� '. service. He said that service was implemented in 1988 and was `;. 'r designed to incorporate the entire Vineyards development. He added •.'' the Vineyards currently has a wastewater treatment plant that services ,the entire development east of I-75, which is also an interim plant. ,r 'r'' He stated agreements are now being drafted to allow the County to ser- vice: the Vineyards projects, both east and west of I-75. He said '' ' those utilities should be in place early In 1991 at which time the rh_ Vineyards wastewater treatment plant will be dismantled. r,' : Commissioner Volpe asked for clarification of access points to ' 04;, this development. Planner Milk indicated the main access is int.nded for Vanderbilt Ari _ Beach Road with another point of access ontc Airport-Pulling Road. Prank Dolan, with U.S. Home Corporation, clarified that the li1 single-family community will have County dedicated roads, however, there will be private, gated roads in the golf course community. Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and :' csrrt ed unanimously, to close the public hearing. . ,, Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight r •�.•• and carried unanimously, to approve Petition SMP-90-28, subject to the conditions listed in the Agreement Sheet, thereby adopting Resolution 11O-603. . ® 000 PAGE 22 • (?i: , `..�;: s rt., .c;.(Q•:' Page 10 A . 8A ! ! :i 3.. 1 a t qq = to Ili: - 141::'! it '1 1: rt -i ! ; yCD s rIf 9: a < iii • _ ii.! -1 l :_a:13: i t 3 i:fr ; g • rn !�! i" f r ill rY a. •a, 3.F;i 9r Y_-a 3 CI list ! { _ m a3aI i. 3+ rii • _ S i!_a'i- ir=k' -3? "'s _a3 2 i 1.. •! :'-.- ¢_f9 Pjf- !__ ?:°.._g5 , 3ii.'1 ; pi. -° : .-w O. , .'•p S. ( ! _ a ;_ iz i i'a_' 't : :a ; sai-=•ri ,- # '3si!<i _] = _c•Y 'a 1 3=�W)i !i Si t '° 3't- tet' ? ( a,5 7 yi .f 4A- stSi:l. t.0la .El i. ui s -;i3 • iii : i i=7 is yi-,- ia il_ f I r , i tJi C 2 ' ;Si .Y.:l 3 s� -3 - ` Sa +. ;a - .n. � . ? �1S :f f • i ' ; u I., ' .1:i, •' •. .i 3!- .1 b: -:•ti ♦a .i=7a:.s j 3 .-S.ai1 -- t _! tali• t a= _ 1 i t; t •- 5 1 -t1 li 1i :-rt °:a - .; a Y=!1 .. !' �2afi33 II- ey. N '_ i3= a� = iIi s -' tl=.i a . y.i• 1 •�� z ag 1 ' r'1/ a lia t 1 3;• f'�_i� _i '.'*,1 ' - g F, — 3 3� i , 1s41.n .. tit °i'- .' i z ° # ° _ 21111 1i 3' ass 3 ! �� os ° S' ; fi = ! i' i ii is : i :11fail i Dii i III1iii -c : 3e, i : i:•ta s: .i 1 a at ' /v U _.—__ -—-- _ r� t Y"-�Ss Yt' iY Oji i� j 1 .a:'D. •f. i 315 it1. i! ji r1 —� s _ • • „. ..„..3.,.......,..:.... ..., . ,, . ;='lass 3.,„.,;:_,_7 x'i!`-ivf, y „ i ! '°'iJ:Ill!. =ia�.3.;1}.}=xt.=;.i51v. y;?3r ►.•-�, `< ' ; 'i ?"s?aa?I_t�: ;ti !{tai. :I•:tiiu; 6ta1tf ▪ .. s-- i-nilr:;l :'i3Y:i':l:iiiai?a;Va-iiiii:i ft. a:.i�`i 1-I ▪ .;1..71111 ii id= 13i'I11ili13:t-1' i ✓ n :z,i4ji_Ti iii: - 1iiii i V- at I r. t,�1 ti sr _ y i 1` Y i i t ea i y - 11 it- i if a f ilkirl i fi iiit 'e I i;",;"; ; ill i t!. 1 7i i i 7' . 4 .. , i - i; I.• iite :' !1 t-: ;tits! a!g N RJ f5i; 1 •:' t.ez �'N,'- *:9t1 % 11 S ci i3 it l c_ !i! :�/�` ' ! =ii - ii i SD_ !1 i i•e : : 11 fr3 tit _ xi "= y x f :ti-.rf las /-a yy i ter re-11, t:.-_. . 1 is i i-: 1 lt.t t• . #.M; 1414; -[; frs •r !!: iI°--` li -i f t '110°1 {l = .1;i i, 141 ] ! le j I..- tt 1 , •e •i1 .1 I' ; 1s °1f 1!=- :' 113i , li tibia I 11 t — : r :-1i1 't! 2iEru '_ 1.1— INN - iaE ;3 ! i _ , '4.-1:41174;11.1%4,2,1 i rif?� aft s9i3' 4 i �` 1 i. r r , � 1.1y.tr•.o:?: 411% . .1` a _ 4.f;;ii ,*. 1.1%4 t 1 ,11 1 ,, �• -I' l-i=isi ifr! (r7T!'l , w I) A I0V41 is- E !U E i77HS 1Y ]Hl1 x4)13- jr! t • _ , It.. 3 '% i—"d+' iurwt " s 7 =s - • o'er d• f I ii 7 1. 14 t h:il t e---•� r.'r - — :. ,4 h 3•is I -t• 1 J Scr, .�� v __ I i! !t 1 r KI Efy /f C . 1. t= 8A i • ,,:; „..,.. %.1 . . ' • .4 ... i•- t.. •-.1 , tti t 1 ;.' 57r, 1:..' z.0 1 3 7 / I ' • • : .1 ! Z 47.1:!. ... itt t . LI 4 : : II .:e..:" !"":', , 14i:44 1 - _ • i.4444 4 ...II . 4' 1:• 1 , .• .. 1 i t 1 :1 .?., ":.! 1:::7•:4 - - 111144 i `..2 „tvNtl .. Itt37, .1 • k•lizz; t -?. ;i .Z. ':... l 7. i i* *-I :4 :••;.• ,,..• • • i:zili ,,1 , R lit': ki: -z=1... ',,.;.0 t!; . I . • . 4 4... ,14 - ;444 4 4,.• -"I •,...t. 15 " l' 71 t• 14 ... '.'t0 !•::; ,:',71 :tn.: Ii. i 4:-...., !! rIt Z:t.. •.•-- 1 II '1 Ill'i ili it! ; ! I i 1 f"i! 1 t0 o •1 • Z., ii 1 1 ! i it tit 1 t..., 2 2 ., 4.: ..c7t , . i :..1 f ! '4 i' 4 . 1 Ittit • 5 . 4 1., ., f , h.. :. -, . • .. 14 1 -- 4, !-i 1 ‘ 1 „, , • . 4 .,. , ,ly..,1 4 t 1.41. t.zi T ,,,-+ 44.. ti ' !!:-. k ; :11 1! : !Irt ' .-4•' . .1"., , i 1 .1:1 t: c 112S !tic qi .3-,:4 . ! , E,, •-•,, : - il .._ -.., kct=, ; 1 :.• , c, Ii41 t;! PIM'..1.l ' 4 (, ) ,,,t.: , , - - 1 54 ..41 1 - , ..:7;.t. 4 i V. t:O. ta7ti4PIZ71.1! ei -1.,.... CI) eN•si : jim - a • r r - . t. .4 tt-tA 1. 44 '''... 4_,. ,.•,,.. : r 3.1 $141.11 icty _ el *." ...-1V.It.. ..*. -4 Tliele!WEL-rift:0 . E.1-, ii 12:;3, , ...,,,,:, t 4. . .4 i I,. , 4.." .1 t.441 C':"I••1••,• ,.. Z:1J34'.„:,.h."..::"•'.•?-'.'.!•, i •4 . etit _ Z;t,.t tl,.;-1t147"11i-•%;14141'.11!",1!-i•74-.0." ;' 1 .11111..13. 0. 1.e.4'1.1t - - ! 411; ; ' 1Sl42.1 11114411" -il ifi;* „ ..2 et11:15.111it ' P \ . . It.:-: : i t . . *: 12 Z:1 1 • .: 1 i " ';- - .4! 4 tl i•ii -:1,.i ', i2t ,, 1 14, ti4 T1 1 1 V: 011t • • 1 a 4 * % I-% 2`:, ! 1 .,•,:!' ;1 el :1 4-r 041 i : .1 ;1 t 1. t.3 ,,-,- 4 4 t' '... '11 ',• ' S." •.• 14 ", i'l .7' l''t .41"It 1,4;% .44 •% 4,4;, ," t .!.!, 'iv' ; I, 1.% 11 Y'w ' X . ' 4.1i. 3t 4:il IV.; Ylii iiIr ,,,...- 44-41- !tl_.11, ,1 i t:: is! „: 0 ttlt:.;i1 ,eltr11,v ,; • 1 1:7,2.i:.1 nal t it i 7,4!„,t .,.al..it, 1 .1 -21 . , t:';'.4.'2 •!..!, Vi.:i--2-:.11 t.. p 1 I , l'i '1.'4.7 ,4t24,411e•I:: It. 11' i _I!' .1:1?4, 4-4_4 pF.,, i 4 Iti iiipi 11,419 iii .... :%17-;:ii tt,.i,;11.:-.11 , ,. „; - ;1.1 1-.1.,.:4 re;to wl:;, „, .:, .: ,- 1. 10 3;1 i' 1'41 -1-;!' !==t ,; .;; -t - ;3.01.,Itl!lil,10::.; / illi 41 l'• t'1.2111; iirt.;341111:11. 1 ,1;....1. ii-l'. 3'i. ' I 4.0 . 1: c Iwo Ao.t1.14.1. %.; 1:- .44cwo. . ; 0-41 4 3 111;47.1! A"4.- 5V 114°,411 li Al 1141 r '404., 1.:111,11=, ,,! iir. :' *. t "1 i i !., 3 vill-... Aerill*I; li t1:13i-, -, rt 1.;% .1; ';z• ' •1 1...4' *". ''' ' ;4"' ‘ ''''' fi,F4 tilt : 2 1.: ti k 2 1.4 , , • ) i . , • ' • -__ EX t 1 1 )1 t tri 8A ., — a S=a -� .. Wv • p i a` fJOC133+5335 ;. ( /F •\ �33t5 sr { . t .. i. CiGi173x5335 ! Cr i I I gig ,c ; - cc _ 1, \ ; ;,i •.,' / `. C i^ C i33++S 335 - c 7. U 3 J 1 , 4.. f T. 1. '. `"!= • "! ....}. -- a .`c • n„ ,A.YI G 1. Ifff q . 7/./' nr:• 1/'..811 � : 4 ., ,, , ( , '.1 '. ..........4 Exkl 1 loll IV) 8A n O \1 x • OM V t : ,ic +}: ��j? = S In V1 c o ;, ,a`o. . W Q . .• • • .fin. �� :, , e ;. a- a 5_d �,tt4ii a. ov, - dz r -;:i.4,: ;',.','.t a^ I J1. f i ` rft• p A r- i ;'. }.. . . . . I.n:. V'' 'gyp '. �. �:C1.:-'. _. tiF5. is � 1 '. t, } • i -i 1 .s a . 1I i.1 i j i T 4x 1 : x it . Exy11 fr» f 61 � � 8A — : 3i _ i� �i y • < /11i t. F F s i - .'ii 71 i t.t 151 751 12! r^ - I + 1 t1-t 11C 2 c:cls! c x751 i .- Vii! f 3.1, v=c:t 11c:c iIt"t i r 5'. 11 MO q:p9 - 43p-5 a- _' a — z -1` .:.„.!.i(4tip � ! !:52:11 `�i7=j1 c izi . -! : s r' :..t t rS 1 •M. •14 £' . ; Fit 1 }11 111 !1-! ! ;!-1 5. .11 n, •.n.n<•. ! e r 11 •;i �• f v . / v - ' + '+ ill i7 1— v • a ! i �j i ,. .;i a.u_ui. t r.•r'+i. a i(i tt fi- .. ! � 'ii tom. _ 3 7 YY '. • — C.'t moi' k'•^J_^. .. _ t .. _..- • :::-A • '- Z - • i r J �' ;�1 _ • �y _ :•sit ! r=_ -. s .i _�w4L • 7,—;' Ss 1,, G! maz ntrid r-izaJtakz to tCxIf:4D ii].;'15_ • —' . i .._.-....1 J g_ . • - • �i _. 1 _ f t I1/. 2 i t .._....1 P --- �7 f __ ::;,:- :::,-3.: st 3jl'1 = ' .C t. .3 7 3.1 .1 ..t 1 3 1 `t '_ -.- _ 1.111 ...3.•3.31• i s 1i :1 .71 {:1 I 'ti1 .I••1:1.3.15.rlt•'+£,,I i-t^ . ..iiia . ; i.i.i,tlli1 8A Y1 t }; ! i, S • is•1 1 4 3' 1; QV • � j �; . , ' es= — :0; z I 7f$ _ r. �• r :— S z \ I X t ,„. T D..' 1— 1 N1,1( r Ni,y L.1.1 : _ , G {;' •`._'�` �� Vis. IL . 1: 1 3St'Hd h _ _ L 1 � i ci : t — \ * ' Exhit21- 04) 8A .... , . ,. . ..,s--1 ,' . i• , I • . .- ' . . •. 1 2, •-„, • t...- '- )i __.,!.1 . „. , '1.; I ' 1 ., . i , :l ..".., 1111 1 , 1 II " • ". . i, • • ' .••-_-_ •,, I e. " • " 1 -" " ""i' ", • ;1 ", ; ' :,-;''CL 5 .7, • „ 1 ., -S , ''• I z F • i :1 it , : ' . t 1, • • . i -it' '< g ._._ .• .,• ;! , , i :1- , .: ,. . • • _ . __, . , • , • . -,... , , •• ,, • - , , .1 . . . , , _ - -- / ,' ,..., - 1.. . . // \' ., , • i IIS X "•• C f :6 :s . .s - \ \ • • -• le . , ,,- p 1 1••• '• '‘ -i - •• it- • X 113:; 3 / ‘,'- . 1,3 i •-. - - ' \ ,./ J.,"\ -'•- LI i ' .3 41.; „ ...,-1;• .-, ... •, ,-../.,* - ..-' t". ', \ _ ‘31:1 ' ' .11-.!. ••:;.......:,., \ . •c ' 2,t,. 1 ., s , • , L1 ./.._____„.- ,,, .. •• .....„. . ._ • - ",'":: t . • •4 ; • Hill . '"Z:: -. ;i:...s, \ - -— - • , y"` i.... . a As 1--- . . 4 , 1.1.1 '"--"i r. 7' !:-.. 7- '-)..'•• ••••-‘ U-) 4 • ,k ... .. 0.I < f i , •-, • :_ • . 4.1 4.. - - I. • • 4 I 1 f•• f ..,,. 1. --..' - 4 1 0.- e' .: - . • , •••• ' '), .._,.', /s, 11 ' 1+ . :• - ' ' -.IA Z":, _, ; • ,v.,, 4. , . ,.- / _ ... • - ••• 1 • 0 M • t \ •• . . i 1 / • , 1 i .. 0 z i , • / 3:i i .. - •--• . , • ' : . '' : ,• ,.., 0:•• I I . .. -.2. .. ,,.._ . <.'• - f i r -. \ „ ----1 , . . .. . _. > .,. . . i ......: , .. . , ---, __-.4"."---,;: : 0 ' I.e f""*".*".1;'''"'••.....„;;;„:„..................."-•...:‘,j, • _ -- -' ,' M' . , ___ - -,, z -. , ,,,.;• 1--• - , , __ , , ! • . , ' . • 0 - , - :'- ,0 7 • zi2•",..• :..... 0! 71;'--..-::-•-' ' ' ..• .- • --- 1 , , --,---LL-----------'----- / z . <-t -Th-'7.:7 • ' 2 ; . , , 1 _ ' • . , 7 . ( LL.1 + It ......-_± ''''''' ...,„,'1 , ••‘4721 •MMMM ct .41 OmOrt, mmirmor j: . ✓ 1 9 li .ini . 1.: -..- - .7%. - :-----... -. • • : '.• 1.• , ;-• 0 . i.,,,, •_____---- -----,---L.-...-*--:. --...,-..c..,.............--.......•....... , • ._...... 4 _•;:iici....ty.::121; mmm .••...' .........N.mm•-.m m. ..m.444 rm./.m.m.m m..M.... i CL ....-1 11 1" 4.,....... Vie. 1,1. m ...; '. ‘.....m. JI -t- 11( - - _ @ A 001898 002308 CR BOOK PAGE THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AT AFTER RECORDING RETURNTO: ^ferry A. Luria, Esquire Terry A. Lurie, P.A. 98 Vineyards Boulevard Naples, Florida 33999 (813) 353-0010 REC IFS DECLARATION OF EAS&'•GNTs PNM DOC This Declaration of Easements (the •Declaration") is made INTday of aF�e� IND 199 enteredyP into as this _LEL=— 1993, by Procacci Bros. Sales Corporation ("Procacci') and The Groves of Naples, Inc. (*Groves"), The Groves Resident's Association, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation :"Association'). This Declaration is made with reference to the following facts; c‘ ., C3 A. Procacci is the owner of Tract A, Tract C, and Tract D on o ;hereafter defined) and Groves Road. Nc.., W B. Procacci has constructed, Ccompleted un and y has ated acceptedThe Old tld o Groves Road to Collier County a, el dedication from Procacci,„--- C---._ C. Groves is bwier-of Tr ct1,11(hereafter defined). 1 Inc. was created to D. Groves Residents' Association administer and maintainthe common area and_restrictive covenants of Y Tract B. 4-0 = E. Procacciifadgra3Red.Groves,tre exclusive right and option od rl o to purchasethe(• do ") in accordance with a certain cl v agreemeentered into betreen the parties more particularly setting C io c— O3 forth the ter$s�of chr.OPEi (rhe_" Ftn Agreement") . for the F. The parties desire to provide certain eadamento more v benefit _and burden of the property and Groves Road, as particularly set fort: in this Declaration.` NON, TBZB 1oP.E, Procacci, Groves an essi c abi held decdeclare that the Property and? over—Roed encumbered, used, occupied,�.and', .iagproved subject to all of the covenants, s, and other terms and provisions ofrthis Declaration thee"Restrictions ) which shall run with the land and be binding on all parties having or acquiring any I Declaration of Easements Page 1 of 11 I ,4. i 1 EXHIBF I Ni Q Z 1 8A 001898 002309 OR BOOK PAGE right, title, or interest in the Property (hereafter defined) or any part thereof, and which shall inure to the benefit and•'bUrden of each owner thereof. ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS When used in this Declaration, the following terms will have the meanings indicated: Section 1.1. "Association* shall mean and refer to Groves Residents Association, Inc., its successors and assigns. Section 1.2. "City" shall mean the City of Naples, Florida. Section 1.3. 'County* shall mean Collier County, Florida. Section 1.3 "Dominant Estate* shall h regard tom drainage in relation purposes another portion ofthe Property the portion which is upstream. Section 1.5. 'Governmental Authorities* shall mean the Federal Government, the State of Florida, the County, heCity, and any agency or instrumentality of.-them having jurisdiction Property or any portion thereof tend)yhose approval is necessary for the development of thePrOfe.± Y o _ tha4.satisfaction of any of the conditions containe4,ts this Declar3tiory Section 1.6. ,*Groves" shall maovner of Tracthe Groves of Naples, Inc., a Florida corporation.^ Section 1.7. shall, mean the parcel of real estate defined on (Exhi t 5`' and delineated generally on Exhibit A. Sectionim rov f :M edianitsndsaape Improvements" shall mean the landscapepeimprovements constricted within thE=median of the stzeet installed within groves Road. Section 1.9. bO1d Groves Road" shall mean and refer to an internal collezting'rpadway shown on the Plat of Piper's Grave aer s recorded in Plat Book'20„ Page 92. of.\the publice"ohsrds ofd of Collier County, Florida. It shall not men,and refer to Road or Groves Road p - Section 1.10. 'Curler" shall mean and refer to the record Owner ;,enlaratior. ct Easements Page 2 bf 11 • 8A 001898 002310 `-- OR BOOK PAGE whether one or more persons or entities of the fee simple title to any portion of the Property as shown on composite Exhibit* •B" refer to andacunaile any buthreto shallh mortgagee mean hast acquired any title mortpursuant agee less sto foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu of foreclosure.osule titleOr m ybe abe an individual Owner or entity holding of thei simple property which is portion of the Property, or any portion submitted to condominium form of ownership or governed by a homeowner's association, the Owner shall be the condominium association or homeowners association as the case may be. If a Tract owned by an individual, corporation or other entity is submitted to condominium form of ownership or becomes governed by a association a homeownersassociation, ocaothe association, shall be the condominium Section 1.11. "Procacci" shall mean Procacci Bros. sales Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation qualified to do business In Florida, which is the owner of Tracts A, C, and D. Section 1.12. CProperay` shall meanre ic Tracts A, B, C, and D and and .roves Road, collectively attached Composite Exhibit S. Section 1.13. 'Public Canal' shall mean the existing public drainage canal along the eastern_ right-of-way of Airport Pulling Road. ` \[• R C Of i ..- -, Section 1.14. 'POD.d'rdjnnce"ahail mean that certain ordinance known and cited as ',The Vineyards of Napier POD ordinance", being Collier County ordi.'.ance No. 85-15, as amendedast amended and e F emeatrdifromnancetNo. 91-75, as such or..nar...ce may i to time. . Section 1.15. Servient Eatskahall mean in relation to another portion of the Property wi, . 'regard to drainage purposes., the portion which isd0wnatream. 1 Section 1.56. 'STWMD' shall mean south Florida Water Management District. --“• :Y -; Section 1.17. ':he Old arovee'Road'aan:sifiall mean the tthe ellof l of real estate descrise3 on Exhibit •8=f' recorded in Plat Book 20,;Page 89,-Publ.ineted Recordsgof Collier Exhiber Florida, containing 1-.12t,acres`an4�l t • •A". Section 1.18. 'Tract A" shall mean the parcel of real estate described on Exhibit B-1 and delineated generally on Exhibit A. Declaration of Easements Page 3 of 11 ' . 4y •. •L _ __ 8 A 001898 002311 OR BOOK PAGE Section 1.19. "Tract B" shall mean the parcel of realZestate described on Exhibit B-2 and delineated generally on Exhibit A. Section 1.20. "Tract C' shall mean the parcel of real estate described on Exhibit 8-3 and delineated generally on Exhibit A. Section 1.21. "Tract 0" shall mean the parcel of real estate described on Exhibit B-4 and delineated generally on Exhibit A. Section 1.22. "VBRI Plans' shall mean those certain plans and specifications titled "Construction Plans for Modification to Vanderbilt Beach Road cnstoPip 'sGrOve the inr " prepared by; Wilson, Miller,e4 PInc., being File No. bearinga latest revision date 6ofJDecember 19?�992nd July, 1992, * shall mean all street and related Section reflectedenta by'SRI Wbykthe VBRI Flans, including the posting ofanyecomp of any completion and maintenance bond or security required by the County, together with the installation of the Median Landscape Improvements. ARTICLE II. WANT CF jAznpRot/'z.�r. OF GROVES ROA. AND D Section 2.1. `-grant of Easements. There is hereby granted and declared a perpetual non-exclusive easement which is appurtenant to, and running with Tracts...3, and D, and bind any owner of said Tracts who have :he right to use the entry area or proceed over, across, and upon Groves Road, far- the pdrposa of providing ingress and egress (both pedestrian and veh:cularl for Tracts 8, C, and D to the publicly dedicated roadway known as Vanderbi:t Beach Road. Until such tine as Groves exercises its opt:on to purchase Tract C, Groves shall have the right of ingress and egress over, across and upon the area designated as roadwa b the OOwnmer~ of Tract C for the purpose of access:to Groves Road. Sxcept aareothe access easement of ingress and egress over Tract C, the access easement granted by this Section shall putomatically terminate upon completion of the VBRI Work and the acceptance of=thevide pedication erpetual thereotereof rights the County, such dedication a a1L Q s. There is also hereby . granted and declared such temporary construction easements an may-be reasonably necessary over the portions of Tract which ichaanre af djacentVto GrovGroves Road, so as • to reasonably allow and Der Declaration of Easements Page 4 of 11 8A 001898 002312 L. OR BOOK PAGE Section 2.2. c^'*D'2t1on o YBRI work. Procacci shall be obligated to cause the completion of the VBRI Work and the acceptance of the dedication thereof by the County, all at its sole RI cost byd expense.24 1994,Procacci but in no evenl be t slater thanated to oJunete the 23, 1994. Work April Aeetion 2.3. ,lea R =te�'te ' he owner or owners from time to time of any portion c• Tract A which is developed and platted as residential and Tracts 9, C and G and, to the extent so authorized in writing by such Owner or cwnere. the occupant of any dwellings located at any time on saimot ay and sha.lthhave a perpetual, contirueus easement and right excl.:aive right to use in cW.een with the owners and occupants of other tracts 3, C and and the nonexclusive right of the and A -Cas over and across the street, and roadway knownnonular 'Old Gr ve ;-- as "Old Gr-o•res Road' as further described in haSPlatead andf r Grove as Old Groves Road. =- expressly ?jeer's and are limited that the passenger1 vehicle rights traffic privileges thatein no trucks, are smiled tor. passenger camper's, motorhomes, tractors, trailers or heavy equipment z.v•'s, heavy aquipa:en` may be brought on the Old Groves Road without the express permission of The Groves of Naples, Inc. or The Groves Residents' Association, Inc. Section 2.5. Cr-se-'e se. Each Owner also retains, reserves,nand shall continue-to enjoy a all pue of rposes which do not e surface of such ntee a Tract awned"5W-ii hts"here n• granted. interfere with the ea s!,-- 9 .S It xela "^hts bf%Gr2Y! - In the event Section 2.6. Procacci does not comaence.the VBRI Work as required b Y Section 2.2' _ above, or does not diligently-pursue such work to completion, Groves shall have the right to eeter.,upcO Groves Road as stated in Section 2.2 above, and cause-the pe0�eun e er-cia p�£�}nq PA of the VBRI portion oWork, and any cost incurredsbyom Procacci e VBRI Work shall be immediately•reiabu_t ed' tPo.rove 'of rom itemized within five (5Y-daya_follow}ng receip by statement reasonably detailing the :,roves' cos: of performing any such portion of,tbe VBRI Work, together with-Esasonable supporting documentation o£;such cost. 1. Section 2.7., Ke'i a `'a4e is°r3vesen:s• The Initial Median Landscape Improvements to be installed in conjunction with the 'MI Work shallYbe Subject- the reasonable approval Procacci and Groves. The ipprovaltiihall be granted in writing prior to the shall also sett forthation the y ich theag agreed antLandscape anticipatedrovements initial Median Landscape improvements. Procacci and Groves shall Ceclaration of Easements Page 5 of 11 ,')1,10,0 �` - -.vrc - 1. .� :� r •r •,, •its s ti.�_ -tea•-:,.• ' .:s ! .xw• : T 8A 001898 0 0 2 3 I 3 OR BOOK PAGE each bear one-hal`_ (1/2) of the actual coat of installing the initial Median Landscape Improvements. The party which pea-orms the VBRI Work shall be entitled to reimbursement for 1/2 of the actual cost of installing the ehininitial Median e iandLY dscapezre Improve receipt menta of from rom the other party, constructing party's invoice therefore, itemized in reasonable detail, together with reasonable documentation supporting such cost. Section Z.B. a tt- - , - • • ove- -.a- and ed_a. _andac- - Inpraxe_+*.enta. The ongoing perpetual maintenance of Groves Road and Median Landscape Improvements shall be provided by the owner of Tract D, at its sole cost, provided obligation be assigned to any oweraociatonestablishedoadminister common improvements ° iexpenses portion thereof. Any devatin from toriginal median landscape planas provided in Section 2.7 above will require the reasonable approval of the Owner of Tract C and The Groves. Section 2.9. L.nten the Qn ^r Area of The Old Groves Road _ • Me L ndeca.e m• ov -art . The ongoing perpetual maintenances of The Old ;,rows Road and any median landscaping trainstalled thereinA, from tate theiro se soleall cost, provided sha i g the equally of Tracts A, B and C, of actual of maintenance threenco "thatdsuchcent obligation)may be assignedctotany heoeneprovided homeowner association,udb-, — ction es`ablowners, shed toor administer associations, enants or any,A, ._ :^ common improvements p;�md.ntsnance`e\g has of The Old Groves Road. ARTICLE III. - STORX WATER DRAINAGE`. Section 3.1. Mena._ he general drainage pattern and storm water flow of ,the Property-stlall,be ar east to west direction, generally flowing. from the eastere;po4i06 of Tract D through the Property to the Public Canal. Tim/owner fvPch Tract,its orwany portion thereof, 6h41i be--cyli9ated to .} po developed with lake system or, otdr mage facilities theHowever, as approved and required by the County and/o Owners 'of each Tract shall not atPaw 't T ctlu a of s ch lwater flowing through 'she system from such;, permitted by governp�ental authority. /Each such owner shall be responsible for the-Solt,f so improv hspacel. Each owner shall also continua/lyTatita , state ocondition e ci ties and repair, at its sole Co6G. 4l1.1;f themdiainigeor facilitiestupon its parcel, no owner being-bb1igat e to the maintenance cost of any drainage facilities which are downstream ,^,ec.ar3t.cn of Ea9enents Paye 6 of 11 • 8A 001893 0 0 2 3 I 4 OR BOOK PAGE from its parcel. Section 3.2. Gran" o• Easastent• There is hereby granted to. declared a F etual non-exclusive with a Dominant Estate over,a across and ut which is pon a Servient Esi running exercised in accordance with suchadrainages planhappro ed by onlybe eCounty, SFWMD, and/or other appropriate Governmental Authority. ARTICLE IV. GENERAL RESTRICTIONS Section 4.1. S Diecharre. The parties, their not the stormcwater system-ono Tractr s A, 5, Cl or D a dischargellow any toxic orhazardous substances, including nitrates, pesticides, other agricultural chemicals, and all such discharge shall be in strict compliance with all governmental ordinances and regulations. Section 4.2. "fas aAny discharge from any commercial portiot A seal bepre-teed prior to any discharge into the storm water systems of Tracts 8 and C. -f a^D Ordinenee. No portion of the Section be he(,N�ordinance nce without the prior Propertynmay be zemoyed``f�t�Qmi written consent of Pro�ic�;'Siid-michaex J- Procacci, and Joseph G. assci ( any such PUD Developer Developer') uchor PUD any has assignr or pif Cofa any a`its-rights as the_ PUD De\loper in a document specifically asaigr. _ recorded in the County.=1and ecor'ds• 4j,—;� No portion of Sectshn l.be Tract D shall" be developed,as, a. rental apartment Complex. No multi-family unit cons-rutted c' c C (defined dwelling unit in a building • paine three ,_pr dwelling shall initiallysold (meaning 1al:Nale of such uni: s the builder/developerto the retail, homepirchase) for a sale price of less tharKS100,000.00. This�strictsZn shall automatically terminate and be.'af`noara her forcethnde 'e.tfe , after ate the date which is three t3\�. Declaration. f/;`Tye pp _Ordinance provides that each entrancetion s own on the *Master Development Plan° for the Vineyarof ds PUD shall be wo ns of a max um 10 square feet entitled either t (2) each or one (1) signwith a maximum area a of a 160 Declaraatiioe ' nof Easements1s 8A OOI898 002315 `.�. OR BOOK PAGE square feet. Groves Road is one of those entrances. This confirms that he and e applicablenttwo to Groves Road, one (1) such sign being located onvTract D (the *East Sign" being on the east side of Groves Road), and the other being located on Tract C (the "west Sign" being on the west aide of Groves Road). The owner of Tract D shall have the right to install and maintain the East Sign, at its sole coat, and the owner of Tract C shall have the right to install and maintain the West Sign, at its sole cost. The East tof Sign and othe and GroveWest Sis as toshall tbe subject to the reasonable approval design, graphics, and wording of such signs. Each such sign may be for the exclusive designation of the owner thereof.of chTractThe sright ntended development of that Tract or any portion obligation to maintain either sign may be assigned to a homeowner or condominium association established to administer Groves Road or any portion thereof. Section 4.6 Tract B Rules zno R gulatigate o s . Thele rBoardaof Directors of the Association may P nd regulations for the use of Tract 8 property. Section 4.7 Inc., Groves its successors les and or assignRegulations. may ipromulgate reasonableeaon of Naples, regulations consistent with the vineyards PW to rules and s govern blish the use of Old Groves Road,s-30 k y�including,systemfor but entrylimited exit establishing a sticker or—'1o: e-of limited access barrier through any gate housettsit-N her(_tFp established by The Groae9 0�:a$�o-*ins:-'at the entrances and exits to Tract a and C. if The Groves of Napless Enc. exercises its option to purchase Tract C-,/provided, howevevehicllthorulerhor regulation shall unreasonably restrict, delivery vehicles. Y1�' /�L4TICta V.,'\ /, 1SISCELLA' O $ PROyISIONS Section 5.1;The restrictions'Contained in this Declaration are not personal, itwith ttl be lroua on and Inuet the'beefofthe partie ohieDeclaration and their respective e.ranaferees or successors in title for a term of thirty (30) yearS.fzom.the date this Agreement shallautomaticallyis seadfter which time said coveninid'aad_re R er. (ha) years unless be extended for successive f feriode,..a- t an instrument signed by then--deo terminatealof the Tcctsra.is been recorded agreeing to change restrictions in whole, or in part. Declaration of Easements Page 9 of 11 8A 001898 002316 `.. OR BOOK PAGE Section 5.2. In the event of a breach of any of the Restrictions set forth in this Declaration, the parties shall be entitled to any and all remedies available at law or in equity. including, but not limited to, the equitable remedies of specific :erformance or mandatory or prohibitory injunction issued by a court of appropriate jurisdiction. In the event it becomes necessary for any party to defend or institute legal proceedings as a se result thisof the failure of another party to comply Declaration, it is understood and agreed that the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to be reimbursed for all cost incurred or expended in connection therewith, including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs (through all appellate levels) . = WITNESS ,•B?.p,OF, this Declaration is executed as of ...this •' /S" day of ,L�C=e,.,gem , 1993. WITNESS: PROCACCI BROS. SALES CORPORATION .../.......0....“...../....:-. By: tc).--. 7e r ars,.rad ei, . - _ •v D u"U : J ph Procacci Its: President '11- ariised \V% C : ` ( :, GROVE' OF NAPLES, INC. . ;_—_---_tri clarrij,, corporation . - arra:w ...2./...- _ ---- :y: �� ' / -- - -. _ • ariat•d , ,'SAH +. 4144LL - i�� .GROVES RESIDENT'S /0" r , - 4 ,ag;. •ti INC., a Florida ,assroom e ' noc fit corporation- . ariac•d wry•a� � �'? • llr -. Y •r.' T 4• ' ' - tttttt IL's "P/2..f.E. ter.31, Declaration of Easements Page 9 of 11 , t 8A r „,`` `. 001858 002317 OR BOOK PAGE CCMMONAEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ,'. COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA 71 Th foregoing instrument was acknowledged dCI foore PRO a this sR - day of e� er . 1993, by JOSEPH SALES CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, and who is personally known to me or has produced t s identification. • I-•' , !. n S l icur.�7 Ackcw.l.d oe MAR X OO .liuti,ui 4r14/ •tined imm of Aclu,crl.dq.s NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EX?IRES: A''3... Mary Lau tlwupn }1aa7?Wk.Sita of slay , ',:1• ' Caeris W.CCMISS '3& eoMy Ca,...144.C:p.c.y)N7 n..y�Warp Lew.11•11•4 O. STATE OF FLORIDA , �-1 lj COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing in3te..:me=•t was acknowledged before me this g day of 1eearn... 1993-1by Tit-tES WItuina' as ____Nasi se___ ____:._.::. - of_ HE.z...DR0OF_SAP '. INC., a Florida corporation, and who .s perabnibly krlowh�v me or has produced _n/_L___----_ as idar:tificatijoi. _�, �19nku,c.r edger 0 MnR ir- 1.0u. Du.,u,v/6 A N Ociet.3 m.oL Aelew.l!dger NoTARY PUBLIC -J` MY CCMMISSION EXPIRES: / /j; i ;` \ • iuvYlNwNuu+N�uNwrwwANlAwiu�uN�•ilZ Marr:a.Sue.pn*!kart�,k:ic.5��.0Amital•w• �y CaRr.n.c'?,+:,n51197..r.no m,T,*.artI.....s.+iaf..\van\W.inw.•n.,t.,.,.».\n\\e•AWM1\HJ Declaration of Easements Page 10 of 11 8A \e,.. 001898 002318 OR BCOK PAGE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �a da of iltMa c4 1993, by s of THE GROVES RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION, a F orida corporat=en, and who ispersonally okknown to me or has produced ._ ad Aligie/4...I . F % , fignateu eV eo.4rger MA stN t o 1. —Za- i4A✓ Printed Mime e! nceneeledger NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 'INMIN/NNNNINNANAMPAYMN N I N iMart la Jiaeip*lin P014.Stage oflan4 wimmist cC30SIS5 ' ' MyGMaissiee&p 1.197 rrlwJn i.•Lwe a'rye* • 1MINNTT1NTiT WMNN1TNTNW WMA alld••eloplc•atex/deeaae.,—1 �1 c-1 •••,;)''s\\ ''s\!� ' — 1 �•' -1. _•ti, � �/ )c ��-----�: •,/ Seclaration of Easements Page 11 of 11 f I` z7. : .h 1.{i e'�:b - 8A Future Land Use Element as of Ordinance No.2018-48 adopted September 25,2018 h) Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. i) Including residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would reduce vehicle miles of travel. j) Providing transit shelters within the development(must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). (XII)(XV)(XXX)(XLIV) Policy 6.5: In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicable: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development(must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial properties. d) Providing vehicular access to abutting commercial properties. (XII)(XLIV) Policy 6.6: All rezoning within the Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development(PUD). Any development contained in a TCMA, whether submitted as a PUD or non-PUD rezone shall be required to be consistent with the native vegetation preservation requirements contained within Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. (XII)(XLIV) Policy 6.7: All new development, infill development or redevelopment within a Transportation Concurrency Management Area is subject to the historical and archaeological preservation criteria, as contained in Objective 11.1 and Policies 11.1.1 through 11.1.3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. (XIII)(XXX)(XLIV) OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. (XLIV)=Plan Amendment b Ordinance No. 117-22 on June 13,2017 EXHIBIT Future Land Use Element as of Ordinance No.201848 adopted September 25.2018 8 A Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. (XXX) Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or rhoods or other interconnectionThe interconnectiont th of local scree sjoining obetween developmentsedevelopments regardlessland addressed in Policy use type. 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. (XV)(XLIV) Policy 7.5: The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This Policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific Subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. Policy 7.6: The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. (XXX) Policy 7.7: The Growth Management Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] (XLIV)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No.2017-22 on June 13.2017 Transportation Element as of Ordinance No.2017-25 adopted June 13.2017 8 "' Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans. The County shall consider the recommendations from the Collier County Master Mobility Plan upon its completion and shall submit those "smart growth" strategies that it determines to be appropriate for consideration as Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code Amendments. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 7.5: The County has developed and shall continue to effectively implement a Corridor Access Management Policy through the development of individual corridor access management improvement plans. Such plans are designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. The development of such improvement plans shall consider the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs), as may be appropriate. (VI) Policy 7.6: The County shall use community impact assessment techniques in evaluating projects in the transportation planning process. These techniques include the use of the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process (ETDM) through the Long Range Plan to address environmental and socio-cultural issues as well as corridor specific analysis through the Project Development and Environmental Studies and Corridor studies. In addition, during the design of transportation projects there are numerous design and special meetings to take into account the socio-cultural elements of the community including character issues such as aesthetics, avoiding or mitigating for environmental impacts, noise and community disruption issues. (IX) OBJECTIVE 8: Maintain a "Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. (Ilq(VI) Policy 8.1: Each year, the County will use short-term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies are likely to occur on County roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the County's schedule of Capital Improvements in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on County road facilities. (Iil)(VI) Policy 8.2: Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Sections 6.02.00 and 10.02.07), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses. (III)(VI)(IX) OBJECTIVE 9: Encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County (IX)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No.2013-04:n January 8,2013 EXHIBIT t • A Transportation Element as of Ordinance No.2017-25 adopted June 13,2017 8 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions within the NTMP, consider the impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems(from a level-of-service and operational standpoint). (VI) Policy 9.1: The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program into this Transportation Element by reference and shall update Program provisions as needed. (VI) Policy 9.2: The purpose of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) shall be to establish procedures and techniques that promote neighborhood livability by mitigating the negative impacts of traffic on residential neighborhoods. The strategies and measures utilized by the NTMP may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to: (VI) (a) Educational programs that seek to remind speeding drivers of the negative effects of their actions. Such programs may use brochures or neighborhood newsletters to spread this message. Newsletters may also contain information on speeding fines (particularly in school zones), pedestrian and bicycle safety tips, and information on average speeds in the neighborhood. (VI) (b) Enforcement measures, which may involve the temporary establishment of a more intensive police presence and a better allocation of patrol time devoted to enforcing traffic safety in a particular neighborhood. (VI) (c) The use of engineering techniques (also known as traffic calming) to slow traffic on certain streets and/or to divert through-traffic away from certain neighborhoods. The use of such techniques shall consider their potential impacts to emergency vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. (III)(VI)(IX) Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. (VI) Policy 9.4: The County shall define on a project-by-project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project. (VI) Policy 9.5: The County shall encourage projects which provide local resident, pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist movement between and among developments on neighborhood streets in a deliberate balance with its efforts to route cut-through traffic away from neighborhoods and to the arterials and collectors designated in this Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. (IX)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No.2013-04 on January 8,2013 8A TREISER COLLINS Richard M.Treiser 3080 Tamiami Trail EastThomas A.Collins,11 n Naples,Florida 34112 Treiser r Collins Robert A..peMarco Telephone(239)649-4900 Christophrirj.Thornton Fax(239)649-0823 Thad B Kirkpatrick Internet:www.swflalaw.com AI RIR„t , ,, 1A11 RichardA..I Shapack• Of Counsel -0 October 18,2019 Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals Co) 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, FL 34112 Re: Response of the Respondent, The Groves Resident's Association, Inc., to ADA- PL20190001155, filed by the Petitioner, The Orchards Community Association, Inc., regarding Official Interpretation INTP-PL20190000062 for the Vineyards Ordinance No. 95-62, Collier County, Florida To Whom It May Concern: Respondent, The Groves Resident's Association, Inc., ("Groves"), by and through its undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Section 1.06.01.D.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code, codified through Ordinance No. 19-13, adopted June 25, 2019 ("LDC") hereby submits its response to the appeal filed by Petitioner, The Orchards Community Association,Inc. ("Orchards")in the above matter and states as follows: I. Introduction Groves respectfully requests that the BZA adopt without conditions the interpretation rendered by the Planning and Zoning Director in INTP-PL20190000062, and deny the appeal filed by Orchards. Groves is a residential community comprised of the 388 condominium units in Pipers Grove Condominium Association, Inc. and The North Groves Condominium Association, Inc. Groves owns and maintains the private gated roadway known as Old Groves Road that is the subject of this and appeal. The evidence will show that the Groves private roads have been gated for more than 25 years. The subject roadway segments are private, were deeded to Groves, and are dedicated to Groves on the face of the applicable plats.Nothing in the Vineyards KID or the LDC or any other applicable document gives the public or the residents of Orchards the right to use the Groves private gated roadways. II. Standing Groves has standing in this matter under Section 1.06.01.D of the LDC because Groves owns and maintains the private gated roadways that are the subject of the interpretation and appeal. Any determination by the BZA that the general public or residents of Orchards have access over the private gated roads of Groves will adversely affect the Groves and its 388 owners. III. Standard and Scope of Review Also admitted in: Connecticut Kentucky Michigan 8A October 18,2019 Page 2 of 8 According to Section 1.06.01.D.6.c of the LDC, the BZA shall not be authorized to modify or reject the interpretation "unless it finds that the determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence or that the official interpretation is contrary to the Growth Management Plan, the future land use map, the LDC [including the Vineyards PUD] or the official zoning atlas, or building code, whichever is applicable." Based on the appeal materials as submitted by the Petitioner on or about May 3, 2019, the Petitioner is using an old and incorrect (1991) version of the PUD master plan instead of the correct (1995)master plan, and does not make any argument that the PUD requires the access that it seeks. Instead of relying on the LDC or PUD, the Petitioner is attempting to rely on circa 1990-1992 preliminary meeting notes and staff reports for iterations of the Vineyards PUD that were never incorporated into the final approvals and were ultimately superseded by later project amendments, and on allegations of private easements. The BZA is not authorized to make its determination based on any private easement, or any plat, site development, plan, or building permit, or the preliminary staff reports and notes leading up to those final approvals. Instead,the scope of the BZA inquiry in this matter is limited to the GMP, future land use map, LDC (which does include the Vineyards PUD), and the zoning atlas. Because the Official Interpretation is consistent with the LDC and the PUD, and there is no relevant evidence in the record to dispute the staff decision, the Official Interpretation must be upheld. IV. This is a Private Dispute between neighbors that does not involve Collier County The Petitioner is improperly attempting to rely on private easement instruments to which Collier County is not a party and the County should not intervene in this private legal matter. The Petitioner's submittal includes as Exhibit N a recorded 1993 easement instrument at OR 1898, page 2308 that is a private easement between private parties. The petitioner also points out in its Exhibit M that this private easement instrument is referenced in the general notes on some of the plats. These general references on the plat do not create or impose any easements. The Groves does not admit and adamantly disputes that the Orchards or its residents have any right to use the Groves private roads under this or any other recorded easement instrument. Whether the easement instrument is valid or not, or gives the Orchards the access that they claim or not, those are not issues within the jurisdiction of the BZA. This misdirection by the Petitioner merely draws attention away from the fact that nothing in the LDC or PUD gives Orchards access through the Groves private roads and gates. To the extent that Collier County is interested in opening up Groves private roads for access by the public or by Orchards, the correct procedure for that is eminent domain. V. This issue has broader applicability than just Orchards and Groves. The Vineyards PUD/DRI is approved for 1,930.16 acres with 5,608 units, including both Groves and Orchards, Bermuda apartments and Village Walk (all in the west portion of the PUD) and approximately 36 other private gated communities in the east portion of the PUD. In addition, many residential PUDs throughout the county show anticipated roadways on their PUD master plans, but are platted and developed with gated and private roads that do not give access to the public or to all of the residents in the PUD. If the BZA determines that Orchards gets to use the Groves private gated roads, then there is no logical reason that the same determination would not 8A October 18,2019 Page 3 of 8 similarly apply to the rest of the Vineyards PUD and to the rest of the residential PUDs throughout the county. The appeal should be denied unless the county intends to open up every private gated road in the Vineyards PUD for public access. VI. Orchards already has the ability to have multiple access points. The Petitioner complains that Orchards has only one access point to Vanderbilt Beach Road, and therefore the county should let them have access to the private roads in Groves. But Orchards already has multiple access points, and they have simply failed or refused to build them. The Orchards plat clearly dedicates to Orchards temporary easements over two cul-de-sacs that will be automatically vacated whenever Orchards extends and completes the access to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Livingston Road from within Orchards. In other words, the Orchares plat was designed in 1994 for two additional "punch outs" to adjacent public right of ways, in addition to its main entry. Apparently Orchards would rather use the power of the county government to gain free access to the Groves private roads rather than spend the money necessary to build their own access roads. Also, the Orchards argument that their private residential community is required to have more than one access point must be incorrect given the fact that Village Walk, also part of the Vineyards PUD west master development plan,has only one access point. VII. Timing,Laches and Statute of Limitations The Groves private gate on its west entrance at Airport Road has been in place since approximately 1993, and its private gate on the east entrance to Vanderbilt Road was installed around 1994-1995 at precisely the same time that Orchards was built. In other words, the Groves private road has been gated continuously for more than 25 years. The Vineyards PUD and the plats related to this matter include the following approvals: 5.7.1985 Ord. 85-15 Vineyards PUD(1925.4 acres, 6,978 units) 5.7.1985 DRI Res. Vineyards DRI DO 85-2 9.16.1986 Ord. 86-63 Amend Vineyards PUD 6.2.1987 Ord. 87-44 Amend Vineyards PUD 10.23.1990 Ord. 90-78 Amend Vineyards PUD 8.13.1991 Ord. 91-75 Amend Vineyards PUD (1930.16 acres, 5,608 units). 12.21.1992 PB 20 page 89 Plat-Tract A"The Old Groves Road" (Airport entrance) 1.6.1993 PB 20 page 97 Plat-Pipers Grove Phase One(35.96 acres) 1.28.1994 PB 22 page 55 Plat—Groves Road(Vanderbilt entrance) 3.22.1994 PB 22 page 76 Plat—The Orchards (83.6 acres) 9.7.1994 PB 23 page 71 Plat—Pipers Grove Phase Two(25.90 acres, 11.14.1995 Ord. 95-62 Amend Vineyards PUD (new master plan for west) 2.28.2006 DRI Res. 06-49 Vineyards DRI DO 06-01 (extend buildout) The Petitioner or its predecessors never appealed any of these approvals. October 18, 2019 „ Page 4 of 8 In addition, there are numerous SDP and building permit approvals issued for the Groves roads and gates over all of these years. The Petitioner or its predecessors never appealed any of these SDPs or building permits. According to the Code of Laws and Ordinances, County of Collier, Florida, codified through Ordinance No. 2019-18, enacted July 9, 2019. (Supp. No. 84), any aggrieved party has 30 days to appeal administrative decisions like SDPs and building permits and plats. There is a similar deadline for appealing PUDs. The specific code provision for administrative appeals is as follows: Sec. 250-58. -Appeal from decision of administrative official. (a) Appeals to a board of zoning appeals or the governing body, as the case may be,may be taken by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board, or bureau of the governing body or bodies in the area affected by the administrative decision, determination or requirement made by the administrative official. Such appeals shall be taken within 30 days by filing with the administrative official a written notice specifying the grounds thereof. The administrative official shall forthwith transmit to the board all papers, documents, and maps constituting the record of the administrative action from which an appeal is taken. (b)Due public notice of the hearing on the administrative appeal shall be given. (c)Upon the hearing, any party may appear in person or by attorney. A decision shall be reached by the appellate body within 30 days of the hearing; otherwise, the action appealed from shall be deemed affirmed. (Laws of Fla. ch. 67-1246, § 16; Laws of Fla. ch. 2001-344, § 1) The Petitioner has waived its right to challenge any of the foregoing approvals by failing to file the necessary appeal within 30 days. The Respondent Groves is not seeking any land use approvals. Rather, Orchards is trying to improperly open up these old approvals many years after the deadline for appealing has expired. Orchards has been acutely aware of the fact that the Groves private gates excluded them from using the Groves private roads for at least 18 years. According to the BCC minutes from March 26. 2002, representatives of the Orchards formally appeared upon a petition from Robert Gentile before the BCC on public petition at Item #6B to complain about the lack of a traffic light at Vanderbilt Beach Road and generally about their lack of access. During the discussion, Commissioner Henning suggested the possibility of gaining access through Piper's Grove, and the Orchards representative David Strouble expressed that they had not considered that option. Commissioner Carter presciently suggested that the county does not get involved in private neighbor easement disputes. Tom 011iff commented that "this is one of those interconnectivity opportunities that the county probably let go years ago when they split that PUD up." Subsequent to this 2001 BCC hearing, Orchards in March 2005 made a formal complaint to Collier County Code Enforcement regarding the lack of access to the Groves roads, According to the Code Case Detail Report, Case Number 2005030408, an NOV was served on Groves on March 14, 2005. October 18, 2019 8 A Page 5 of 8 There were subsequent discussions and meetings between the parties. On July 21,2005, the code enforcement investigator notes reflect a phone call from an Orchards resident named John Mansika relating that the Orchards residents were not pleased with the way the Orchards board was handling the matter and preferred instead to work it out privately with Groves. The notes further reflect that the county ultimately determined that there was no code or ordinance violation by Groves, so "it is a civil issue and the prerogative of the Orchards to determine if they wish to hire counsel and proceed legally if so desired." The alleged code violations were marked as "complied" and the case was closed on November 10, 2005. In 2006, it was discovered by Groves that certain Orchards residents had obtained or copied unauthorized clickers for access through the Groves gates, and in fact it appears that certain members of the City of Naples police force residing in Orchards were using official police electronics to access and use the Groves as a shortcut. Representatives of the Groves informed the City of Naples regarding the impropriety of such apparent trespassing by the Chief of Police and copied the 2006 letter to Commissioner Halas. Most recently in 2018 Orchards again submitted a complaint to code enforcement, and was advised as in 2005 that there is no code violation and it is a private matter. According to Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes(2019), the statute of limitations for bringing an action founded on a written instrument, such as to enforce an easement, is 5 years. Further, under Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2019), the doctrine of laches also bars an action for enforcement of an easement if not brought within 5 years. Orchards has been prohibited from using the Groves gated roads for more than 25 years, and over the years has waived its opportunity to file appeals to all of the administrative approvals related to this matter. Further, Orchards has waited far longer than 5 years to bring this action and therefore the action is barred by the statute of limitations and the doctrine of laches. Orchards has sat on its hands for far too long and should not be givin this additional bite at the apple. VIII. Exhibits submitted by Respondent Groves: Groves asks that the following exhibits be included in the record for this appeal: 1. Location Map—Vineyards PUD 2. Location Map—Groves Airport Entrance 3. Location Map—Orchards Vanderbilt Entrance 4. Plat of Old Groves Road Tract A dated 12.21.1 992 PB 20 page 89 5. Plat of Pipers Grove Phase One dated 1.6.1993 PB 20 page 97 6. Plat of Groves Road dated 1.20.1994 PB 22 page 55 7. Plat of Orchards dated 3.22.1994 PB 22 page 76 8. Plat of Pipers Grove Phase Two dated 9.7.1994 PB 23 page 71 9. Vineyards PUD amendment Ord. 95-62 adopted November 14, 1995 10. Deed to Groves for portions of Old Groves Road dated 4.19.1996 OR 2173 page 260 11. BCC minutes of March 26,2002, Item#6B 12. Code Case Detail Report Case No. 2005030408 13. Correspondence dated March 23, 2006 from Pipers Grove to City of Naples October 18, 2019 8 A Page 6 of 8 14. Deed to Groves for Old Groves Road Tract A PB 20 page 89, dated 2.19.2008 OR 4331 page 829 15. This correspondence submitted to BZA for this appeal 16. All written e-mails and communications submitted to the BZA for this matter from Groves owners IX. Objections to Petitioner's Exhibits Respondent Groves objects to and rebuts the numbered exhibits attached to the petition filed by Orchards as follows: A. Owner List—No Objection B. Official Interpretation—No objection C. Corporate Sunbiz report for Orchards—No objection D. Map of Orchards—No objection E. Map of Groves—No objection F. Exhibit A-1 Master Development Plan from Vineyards PUD Ord. 91-75. Objection. This exhibit was deleted and superseded by Ord. 95-62. The correct master development plan is different in that the commercial at the intersection of Vanderbilt and Airport is enlarged in the new plan, the access road to Airport is no longer shown in the new plan, the golf is removed from Village Walk in the new plan, the multi-family tracts in the new plan are larger, etc.This exhibit submitted by the Petitioner is false and misleading. G. Minutes from BCC hearing of August 13, 1991 on PUD Ord. 91-75. No objection, but this is not relevant as the PUD was subsequently amended in 1995 and it predates the relevant plats. H. Minutes from BCC hearing of November 14, 1995 on PUD 95-62. No objection but this document reflects at the bottom of page 5 in the comments from Mr. Saadeh as representative of the developer that the Airport Road entrance behind the Groves guard house was intended to be gated and private. I. Pre-application meeting notes dated May 27, 1992 for plat of Pipers Grove. Objection. This is preliminary staff comments from an iteration of the project that was never implemented, was never incorporated into the final approvals, and has been superseded by subsequent iterations of the project J. Memorandum dated June 26, 1992. Objection. This is a staff report from an iteration of the project that was never implemented,was never incorporated into the final approvals, and has been superseded by subsequent iterations of the project K. Memorandum dated August 7, 1990 (approximately 85 pages). Objection. This memorandum is for an iteration of the project that was never implemented, was never incorporated into the final approvals, and has been superseded by subsequent iterations of the project. For example, this memo predates the Plat of Old Groves Road Tract A dated 12.21.1992 PB 20 page 89, the Plat of Pipers Grove Phase One dated 1.6.1993 PB 20 page 97, the Plat of Groves Road dated 1.20.1994 PB 22 page 55, the Plat of Orchards dated 3.22.1994 PB 22 page 76, the Plat of Pipers Grove Phase Two dated 9.7.1994 PB 23 page 71, and most importantly the Vineyards PUD amendment Ord. 95-62 adopted November 14, 1995, as well as the Vineyards DRI Resolution for DO 06-01. The memorandum reflects that it was prepared for US Home under an iteration of the project called Stoneybrook, but this project was not implemented. October 18,2019 Page 7 of 8 L. Minutes from BCC hearing of October 23, 1990 on Stonebrook Estates. No objection, but these minutes are for an older iteration of the project that was never implemented, and has been superseded by subsequent iterations of the project . M. Plat for Pipers Grove Phase One, Phase Two, and Plot Plans for North Groves. No objection, but these plans clearly show in the dedications that Old Groves Road was private and dedicated only to Groves and not to Orchards. N. Declaration of Easements recorded December 29, 1993 at OR 1898 page 2308. Objection. This is a private easement that the county has no authority to enforce. Groves strenuously and vociferously maintains that Orchards has no rights under this or any other easement instrument to use the Groves private roads. O. FLUE excerpt (2017). Objection. Today's version of the growth management plan and FLUE cannot be used to look back and undo the longstanding approvals for the Vineyards PUD/DRI that was originally approved in 1985. The project has been found to be consistent with the applicable version of the FLUE in effect throughout all of its various approvals. P. Transportation Element excerpt (2017). Objection. Today's version of the growth management plan and transportation element cannot be used to look back and undo the longstanding approvals for the Vineyards PUD/DRI that was originally approved in 1985. The project has been found to be consistent with the applicable version of the transportation X. Conclusion. Respondent Groves respectfully requests that the Board of Zoning Appeals uphold and adopt the Official Interpretation and reject the Petitioner's Appeal. Respectfully submitted, (44Christopher J. Thornton Attorney for The Groves Residents Assn., Inc. Florida Bar No. 0114936 Treiser&Collins,P.L. 3080 Tamiami Trail East Naples,Florida 34103 Phone: (239)649-4900 Fax: (239)649-0823 E-mail: cthornton@swflalaw.com 8A October 18, 2019 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via Hand Delivery to the following persons this 18th day of October,2019. Jeffrey A. Klatzkow,Esq. Leo E. Ochs,Jr. Collier County Attorney's Office Collier County Manager 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Suite 800 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34112 Naples,FL 34112 Mark E.Adamczyk,Esq. Board of County Commissioners Adamczyk Law Finn,PLLC 3301 E. Tamiami Trail 9130 Galleria Ct Ste 201 Naples,FL 34112 Naples,FL 34109-4381 Ray Bellows Planning Manager 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples FL 34104 Christopher J. Thornton;FBN 0114936 8A ,,.._ • . • , .31 .4 • ' %'.18,4. " .b91.411114Ir ••••• gr . .- r -tr l'i j ..., ... ,%.,..th ....• Z ' 11P....., , 1' • •••:1 4f•oi . .14'.. . ,P je l IX! •• I. JAI •!--.7'...... V"1.1., ,. ''''••..1.•4 17.41'.,..." ........ 4••• ..4,91.4141 = ,.. 4 SkIlislaim • ,..... ,., ......,,,,.., . ... . ,., .,,,,.. . .04 . .•a`ZI '.3gel it•;,.::ggCF-V a• .. '-.1, CO •""--", ...eg r ye or• • -I.., ' .... ..r,„ CI' 'T.- ..,.,,-w 7 •••••••t7 Air• -, 7,• • 4/LAI t.I.. c. Ar 1 rlt • .1 ,,,,•• ,•. 4,.. I,. n. ••,,,or 4 • • • •• • ..i....- - •• . ..; ... •;;••;:,,,.. .. ,....„I .-.); .‘„,,,. li..,-.. , ._ m ...r.... , ,.;. , • .,et,•4.:,-0-•• •%.c•- Mt* .- . • • -p• -...1 si Jr;' • r u) IA. ',., ''''. ft,T.4:;,.;;••• `,-. ..,;(1-,;,;„ ' ., .T,--....p ismvi., .a. '. 7..4e y c" -' c • 11."' 1.1.1 . W „,, ,,, • -. v4, •s(- .• • ' . •'Nut ..4: **-1," *.-/-* i• • ''''-44,A , ' .- ' ' 7 .JAE •, ,-.. 4";',c*rIC.4": c!,,•,4'..747•.•..i.,d.,. . .. . . • „;‘,7 .. ›... •.:-._ c . '4 .• 0 it J D tiervere . 2 e 4.. E - ........,.............1 1• (4A!: °4*444. 4-.A.4. ‘.4-.0-.- - - . - " .1 '=., - C• •., b wo.,axnr0.1.... 'r: i; - V4.• 7if ti .2,4i4 1 rIti i: o i A,. •f; 1*-rc''f ' , • : r •", .. . ‘• , • 4 .r. ir• 0 : L.:3;a,utro$4 La Ian DLVD.rli , -, • --. E va-r•••••••••••11 ..... . ,.., •- a i ""•": .. --. I* • • "'II i . ..• ' siovq•p. tem, .",' .!"4. ''., -----r ... 1 - 17-'- c5 tpi ••...,:r -,., . •• . sm. - -' v.tt•---1%.. t JA 0' a. .ec,' • ei. .4.- ...'-4.. cr) ••.- 3...... - 14.. . . -... ", _ ,,,t, e kr .t.,...yr,A •,..'.0 • AirlUt _, •• ,:,,, , z i k •C Illt4 ..„,,1 1t.ii • )-tt:2 . ..AI- I ... 4 S . 4 ,... it. .hi ....... , 1- zo. ,• - ' . -• - „. 4,....ift . I. ..1% A, ,,. NA, • 0 •• .:c-7,. S7 - .4. CO - .. 1..,1 • ... • .. . ,Lt: - - ... .0" - - ' '''.,..' • ,P3:,..14. ;/1-Z..k.ir. ,; r•leti,r.1...,i4 1 t' .. .- . G.) -- ',.......,, . .rf C'' X .. s‘f..?r 1 v's1/ 7.; ' na 't k,.• :i A,.• •,:..••z...--.4 >,. ....ate,:• % ..4.- ' _."--- • 0 , t t z,,, t,,,4. • ,,..Ar iiik: '-.1.-E I . ..::-. .t- - e .4 C . . .1',1 ..., -.- A. - - •-:11 . liar . ,7, > .;3.-:. , -, ; T.,, a ', 4.-',4it • v.,..w...4: .,,,,- .4•• '•-• , < t t.4;1 • '• . . . 0 ; 1 - „,.. • ' I . jet .,_.. . ...swigs/ .... ..... ' -di. •. ) ..... . .t *. ,2 1 r 1... _ 1,.. 1',Z57:. ....,. 4 :11, 's 4 r ... f*-.. iit: . -Ot..- ''. i:•"4',-- ' • •A• 4-tr,-4-tri"• ' Zi:1111... 4-41 ' • 11-.11 ,... 4 ' 1.4''. . :tgitZ14,.. %if 'e '' 'e'4. .'' `.* • I Fyisebe....-..„ dr • A''.-.'N. a) r.L7 ...' ,... •., ..ki....,,, i T.... - . ,• -,••...L..... . ,n• ' t. .÷. ' -. Fldt"N•2 ' .-:-. 4. e./ girl A'-.7 1 -1.1." , IV ..,'` ,.t . -":P• ., ,..,,,,1 NI 1 _ -1*...-..,s :.v.v.0". _ks,11 , co i ra. _se ...,-i i "Ai. -': 'I r,,,'7,4iP I F•111-t s-'*.,7 II1 it 41• .1•r I I I Ie. , ' .%di ig' 4, IIII. ' •• rr !% •/ -'" • ,'1. To • 1 ti. , . -:. ,. -... _••,,L,414., il.•io..., 1:1,T ..:....t. ..k--&,-...,... • . - • i . -, -..- . .47, - h 4.,:ft, .. . • _ - ,.......,..... ,_ _ - --- _ • 1•-•s.i. iii . 7 '''''01 Cr) J116621', .....' •'''''''. . fir p.440'.ii. tm,-... •.' a'2 i ......5..0 JLIV3t ,.- 4,0-•c •• .1 1 , .. • ' Oil Or./vP1.11"" P'7.',"' • 41. '' .. .r.Null 'r l'all t \ 4 -.1.V: 111 )- I ^tear A .1%'i li" A/r." ' '. '•• .1, co, I,-- ). • IP i r • I ,• ,.•• tt. - .,:. trfigajogr? r. - ...1: ...IV:, _ .. q 1•A "airon- -emer + It I It y rilirliRa4p-.1.. , _ :, • -• "0 I-...... -so a) c r i I .... CI3 N co 01 V) a) ..0 r • . 1 1111101 ‘7,.. -- CO CO 0 V. • - • CD a) _Ne _.1 cri ,a) as l:J a) 0 cc ce •c o -.,, 4,,,/, 03 ,:. 1 . ,• = tv co ca ca 0) C • AA ' = ' r - •A t .7/ 1 I 4,,_ •v (t) -0 1. 1-- '.. ,• ..1.1. I. • C C > C Lt.' ,,,t-• fri (n = C 03 a3 CU ...',.... ''''',„ 0 '- --- - •• - *•1 pr, it Ai 1 r • 1 VI*" -••• ' 1 4' .' Ili 6 r•--: 6 oi ci ,--: cNi oi 4 Lr> ai 0 i . • 0" . .t 3, fi) • .. ' 1 II C4 CV CV CV CV CV CV CV CV CO V, V, 01 Ce) 0, 01 i w/ -4 i-- r :•-.* ' .2" i '.• "- - " -. I.1 IA .-- -,. -, ..•ri , - -,.oh .....) ...„ r, . le i ,1 -0 ;Ails: , • .x., 0 c0 CD . (1.) ..... n., .. ...... '7-4. CO i . CT3 = 0 ..11k0, tk a.) v., • ,-, II Lt*-,•-../. ,' 11.- • , -. -, w c (i) a) o a) CD Ll zr., , „..•:,,...; ..im,....y. - 0 CD CD ,.,11- >, 0 C Ct$ 1:3 ' ; ' I .,„ 1.-...- sa... 03 C AbC C.) .- .- C -... 1.•• >.• • 4 ii:•2 -40:c ' ..,-..:: If . el Ca C1) "."'" a) ••-• c a) -0 ccs CtS 0 cc a) w ce a) o ,g) 0 ., & . c.c11 II, . • f u) '-e.). 0 2 o > o 0 -c) L_ al ••-• --lEc = „ m -a) 0 -› c P ,,, 17"--r- ''''`ifftl'• '- r-,-.2- 'I i LA _-1 c C E = cr a a, - ...,e 0 c„ „,, , t L.. Z (1) 0) = C ''' al el.4 ',IA t--...t...----•-' co ° 0 = = cl) E cLesc- ,-,M CD ,.,,a) , .150cnor. i ED- TT3 1.- = > 0:13 CU -C - 0 '&7. LI- k.:.) i -I -I Z Z EL. I 1 Tir_c •i• .. . c 1.:, < < < co (...) 0 (..) 0 L.0 . . . . . . • • • . . . ,:; 1 - - 4 r.i_ •,. .. . ._ = . . . . . . . . 0 , CN/ V) 44' 14 CC) r•- co a) o m 4. , •• ' • > u") ..- 0.4 co ••;4- ix) cs) 4,-- 00 03 . . . . . 1-- ir- ..-- ..r- 1-- CN1 1.1 ,11 i tt --- ° -- yI. . , r„ ,.., .. .... , , _„.-..1 C-4--AIEN4j-i"...11/41 •-•0 I'-.7 : ..7,,x e„4,,, ,....-0,-, , . ...4.- AI (a.,-,) ' 1...,%,,ti 1,..,.... ... „,...,. . . ....? ..-,:r J -I fr.a.*:-AiK: 7. 4r 4 , 1 "* ,, ::,•. Pll'i I'l• •1 .1..* .• •i •,),..t pi! .: 0 , . • - --... _.......i. • IL -'.1- kiir.:`,..1 . 1' •',.." • ''..., I ...Y. ' 'r '.je s Millipl ' ''•' 1• f i LIK • • _ . ... , ....,.. • _ . , .. .... . • f .6114 pa fr. - e. 1 . • 3.i,., .r •: - -. 10 t . . . r . A . • t. . . 11 , .1..e.jk e$k•4 1-4 - •i-'Z1. -..-„.-• • . ..4,7r";.-''•.4"-rI ? r, .ow. .. 1.••04e 1.44. , , I • • I .. A z----r_ ..,..-:-.1 'us,/leir w ,..7•••• /,';f•-74..-e7....;••--:4. •'.•;,..;.4. ' A .... : ,:-.--....7....._ - .. . 4. . * 0 I. _ :.1. F • , ,. , 11 x 4 - - IN. dee •- ' r trill' or 1 es ea S n't' OH°bpi° ot.cqui nid i '44,- jigIr., LU , ti .01_ , _ aliSM.. /ILL IR I ....„ _, • .. to ., Li*. . et it.... .4._ . . .,„ , . .. , aiiiilim f...1 . It •.. • : , , 1 ,.... i .. v 111__It . ,, .1.. 1 1 . , .. .,..., . , .,. , ...• .. ., ...,,, - —11,,, • .1,• . ...., Po Co, .o.• dp •se tit46,, . ...... ., • , ., .. . 1 -."„ • 4 , II . i . 1 , N 111 i t •APIA I —-.., , S 4 A -- li, ,iw 1 •111.1r. . do•‘ , c 0 P' 111144 t' .. ' 15 ... ,, •••• 1 - • P.s r'' :. .., _ ,- s -0 a..% •••.1. ., . Ilk 4'''' _ • ,.. .I, ' 11('' •2;4 t , . * ..• i I'i .. P . 1 W illk ' • I tt -,, , I I.- , . 4 . . . V • . 4 ...0 ' ,, . -4 ,A 1 ,.. • . , . a ;.. • . • . / . 1 c i • r6:4 In ' li -.1.• , 1 • v . I. 1 114.0 . *it, el , 4 4464 1."11 -er te,, Milt . liar- 11 ' r4flagift-t4 . . . 44 .. .ilallrallisa ...--..611 i lot f * . % . - , .4' •• -N tr3.2 , A P i _., . a 11 . . • . - . , I. 1.4 *p. , • I , a* i ; I 1,.. --.1 [71 .. • -A ........m•- illaliti T 1 9 eV' '-.- ? ' •t - . - • 47. 114 • • ' ' 1 ' •7•••-..,. 1111111111/1F— ' IMMO i .....t:„ 4,, : v ,Ir• .. ... ... .._ . T"" ..,.., -... ... 8A JO . Ir.*.: 41-.• • .....,\, . , . 1....: --III"...46— ift '' . .' .0. . .47, ( )3: t'i 11-.Z.I.'... • .I : ,i : - : (11111 40;iN. ' t'mow` _ ....."',.... *.' 1 .:::5 i •Id- _ 1 t,11'fled •C CUbCA -f r E4uoN .mew..•... 11111!1,,k ON OPP' I 'liI I I E 11 3 tiff".• J. . ,so i,g. 1 9I , . * . �> `V x lit ;'. ' 4.1?.34 -1!. ' ' ''... * . %y-- ` III } •i ( y 4 i 1 7.: r _'dr" • ' . , _ -., :,--,,, , J. '4F3 1/411. - _ ... {. 1 `� ire Jty 4401 • 4 . ..,,, '-' • - Le •:-frit11.6 4 .'..Ati r ,41,1" ‘ -...": «' a ritr. :.. L. li,. 4?' P.t I • 14 • riq '" + �. 411- ,. J i.. aer; i.. '-,' �� ►` a t0's 61 4ti K -3.1 H lir 1 . I , �— r• ,. _ �V _ 8a �> t t4 C2 tr, e.o. c e Y QA`s"cc �c -: a L2 !!:;::. ` - _a as. gs ' sas s e� sce s c'�o_— 'S I6�� € b se e` oW ^c �^ =„... g.� 3 E 9 j¢� r tr gtr� i'a :43 W0 ii ali El imilmo N laW p5yM $ �. -6 $ y4 �`6<e G 6 x.53 �, 5 tilt w8 G i ffi 5 S E ^ism- B ! gg b .-E11° o rnfoo d = $ g s Ei 5 :��••� o 3R' :emo .,,o . o g 1T,(\fie,. E-:52 l gi 1-17.1 a W .1 6e' g ---of..ja e s p,--- a-i-§ - : `! g.2; �12=e t f 72`7' nig it ea., R` ti ek' 5 11. 8 00°9 4-6 H5 ;gig NI ii &COT .45 v,-,-<Siii-7, 4��=tr i a k 2 �� e- S � tr E <°�a a� � a Li 2 s0 rII, 4 ati : ee p �5a.- xtts a Itr g wo 1 61 �@@,4(� a 151 Etil E tr -iia$gbga-;.h. Eh Rad of iitr � $:: fq ri: 8 ` 41 S .1G I tal &v. 1 a I� NER tiG I _896.'-YAC ” fors"..:,', i.lav1': 1 g ..t 615: s o a„ n. 0i SI 4 $ < It7; 8 I i ligig• I g W ---— xlxox monT..n lv --- vino g 4E N ^ = 814 : 5.E. ii 22 CSE ,,,,,'5 W" Li": .k' )5: 11 ' 1 ' xca .d 8k `a tr .SCJ r EW f-.-.Cip ^R :El g it ----/II— baa "' tt. W W ... i w '.v.-dD-taafa�irm.iiii k _L.ODI J$3QfE 3J L" a-z 1 :,C .I.�tiYj P. i .Y En =p 1 1 $ 4302 / r *-4-7e---,* , Fi 1-er-- . In '1 110110 RI f a ii . , I e eg 14 CD �Wy C _a 1e2S $' 3tr trPogg . 3 � �t g » ol . ag faIg ` / sa $"g g s =Hi !!iiii <ca e$ aseC iti � z- - S yn 0 EL11v 1 / sods 1 11Y1g�1 4 S if t !gm 111 °: 3 2 I .a < .tr� t ,: Eli f 1 m It i s� iG 6 S� '4'-b Bst: i 6 `- Y;; Cbl 4 6 '4'-b , F GG ta r°,7,60o ESC 7 E E. =II a i!J!hl aziff: 4 .Eg E ., eR k a 3 $ �d A NI* Jil I 8A s 1'- ti d. r3� t/) �n - `3 e' S i. gs jW: AngLU glEE . F Ey Fxa - ...f cep: =e W db ='•`s - =Ra' "wi s=e eP 8 P. kE I !1i 8_ s s:Pd L g vsd-� " s 2g.--P0 I s� 11 ' € �_ �- o • pit, $ m • - 6: a e,ve. 9 .- Sae"".„ets 'Edd�� . t ¢w $ 6e ei li , a ° < s eeec §c:=Ja s� �” l'<- Pl-e.f�cyn 1 1 S1Y;tri$ ' F"- IgEi'l 30 LI tg4g LW o sg:DAP-S; c4.?e:4 ;74ttga� = 1 t yG § g..trW x56 €B 6 'A k * 'sd 'It 5 5deg'rasSE • _K a'-iii wa ! 11;K:rt 8 s=W.e i . :i 5E-• if Si i €s� i *1! N`. s aHl; "' a tr.Spl=_ ti.•.12 I ..oRsdi. EIS s .'jai- fEt:- i i2E, e • s s = lit ! P! ' grq _ e i i i!o . B cc F CD h .. L•-•i';......- I 1 -.9i g )k A• s �/ 0 y i' DoYO O �'f y L \-- Ol w r {. 2 B l' s I g _ G J g� . • S V 1 W '%\ N,,. i° L I r c0i B !I a NEW tit Cts e_3 e NO `'1' i.� O ' z U i p. '' i J « at 6 Ela-P dN :0* m'18 _ Cf) _ :'fit.- @ e e C U d8 ry .mt<gR ..g �,� u y d E" S = 8174.3 'IR da Smd :li d L� " a e = :6w":- 3 =358---t-- €-- 2. F- .geo -ss a : ahax�"-aat< �a 1 : i s tas; a� p$s. s<sg3 olsem -$"a,a gs-s"s I"�.{ a e =_ ' - �eg. g ae" a evert a eE5 r aa33eisec.m 8 gt . e`sm€ /1 i 4 3E.: .r a F:91:t-2• •sn:1; ;5Js3sl a 81 ; i lih ale 1 ".1*o =a W pg ev d a t qg 5 aKeeo E s s HP s s-ee c I gk e g t a - �.��< 16114 s b e . ig '- �9'gF a EYE gweE ' e d 1„of y _ . ,—P .- t -r� a--t,g " *. W1.la :- = :Se- Ei F <Ea • `3 3 r`,! ,�i _ 5!i" i.-AF i,:y.!. 6� ! iY <siII s5 N 20- :1L il g i ! 1 ° .- ..... eeg aLe€ ta,4. °'�=" "am.e!e lead egtZ. �1 wr a R e"s.ecea..a ,,<g gs W = W � cr g„�= =s 11 9� ” � Amo �< Bey «aur n +c-" wEcE,E.> a is c ttimial .� hi ___ :,8.„ .5'47.: .,gEE.-;_-•,-;-.2,f, = aE. i , Y_r.. 5-a ? 9�Wd6.= Y., "e a`m,Jc� "u1 N <p awe Wge`W„ g W�6 y . •, W g€ p_:� , �e19 N i . g`i&eisgtgg s a h1 4 14 $"q F ffi 4 d" 63 3d3: 1s.5-m_d Fty� . r6 d �'o•` •. 4 1.'~ C`I : E ggi- " .7B B ga liT44: IdzoR `o p..=`� .g.pF. 4 to ." -- - "_"* v- t*:. `� "e seY `may[*Y' ppC 7 e�� "S ialee=oW: �. S H5HEE5 a r,24en Pa" aria ®,\ .-,. r m bhi 6�O�07oi�ur.a�iw.oF i !b W tl "' " 3m i yeaI gr, " :40m o2 y � A a n • co I .Z. 1 OVN1 ?� ( # 28.- H .£ 3O £ 133NS 33S - 3N11 31VW : �- 1 C Li, o� 1 — ► I s¢ Q <.W I� L.L.I q_-•Lfeh: —axc .n o0 0 — 0 A.X.;l.ao s �-fil B tL a•scc 1:E€.s,.oa a ga�ae�on ` �ar.1® —ee sc— m 51 • k 1 e� O O o oo•or1 1 ,res r", •aN 1.3Q.476;lj/ I' r.,,,�M-,,Asr--_a.._T________ . '�8 PrP c it 3.ee.sl.oe lig S!' 41 r_ Au+1wa i ---�"�• '--- a•clr $_ q :R�Ea �' 0 O H !ir,i.1I a 8 _ L ,I \� ?O 3.011 e 44 4 ��8 4. �r n m ti = al New ; r. Y _ b U el. %V Wm 221/0: F. x W,• i .� 83 6 �F W ^ I I NI .. i m z c.®-• O N �I^ : �fi�Cn -13 W L J S (..D I I I �. _ _O e.ec�ii:oa s m '�s .EC 8 �6� 2 CO z.- I . ° SG ..eG.s:..e a W : A g 4a ili F2'''2 to I l n.ec.ei.o0 a ° . �o Hm -� Z d Wft O1 I cer - ill! �f� ^ �w l � l QI ti• 15d . V ) C wu, b' ' ` to(V ®�O u`, •� W W , e' �,. �w OCOd \. ''S '/r 4-4 4 4-4 O 5 _ 0- ;J/ / li W 0-D.lr \' `` ''',4, ,S I m t O D ,b ^� //''�jo w 7, 1 \ , V, W (J0 O y W •;-'f,; /^ Ili C/7 cn o `\�,•%., j f— �l� c� i 7 '�R6 ads �`bnaa k• 7a ' it 1 S � 1 DZ W '4a Vi g .• ro I, � t- --z I�. I '� CO V) q, s . IS I e O2J i "IX �� t , 1:3 ' Ins `. O O ~�b c1 ^o� t. `'�79 y111 1 0 e\`0 '" ` k _m1��8�� m Wim.. ,, e '� t i =1 BWy Wt>>rW c4 -„.. i t «st86^R _ / '77 F,,.' 6; '.r 6), EI 1 f'- au Nn�r'8g:n'•_ '�-�J LL'— ” cl Tg.s.Q MM \,-� � qq� �i U 'd 1,` pg a n m �- 1I7.. E 1•'' ;x•,– NT-, Q [S.....m....m m oq� i 1 �`air �,h, iQ LL' m0 - ! �� 1;� p F— 0k, 32oB8: w, . _4.4w§. .A Ic ��` 080 S a7 V 'r L 63.00ioseos '�`�'`� VLIEE 8g�R88S88 1 28 a 1 qN= 1L r1 E : aIlf lief R:x:RxRraEo»� L,1 c4 A 51dWS000e.e ry g b ,G.G,W g e > "s 5 I F as m orm a.c.lww.e re» _�sJo zl n�ap.Gea „�_' 00 • - -\„ -'7in=ma-nlrwitlr•8•a-� •o a o 11130A'7]a1•'IGLMINI.ai - ^ WW.KK•1 CIPILE II.Sf.I'C•20 M V ,' NIYK-i0-100141 111NY0 1L 4 .001!0 3015 1513 meiNOWDOOM.` 1 11011035 d0 3411,15311` I van:,«,:.„ o8.1,4“ggae:40.Ir08.00. t_^^mm.8&8om.-_^SWR8R88RE gA8 «...m .: .^V. _ mSs.R _:.,_ AOR:,., .n.2SXnn.:S`rm^.., i2 ! il 1111114111 lili111111111111 eV er P :1.g 61-14 .g • 111:11111111111i1 MI Ili 08eory8m'm88 - - :8888: yijyjjy'yyY1j'y'yyyyyyyy� Oo0)OC'.,�*C.©'00°O©o000000000occ E,o,,p,F, caydo E,tle,,,,..E, .,, o,,oe, 8A A - - Wane...n..n----mdxRa - RRm^s"-ma B�7agdidRR ^�za _nI. ry i Wgrrrrerrrrrr rrrrwW " ma's E?:vt'tK i.„w: Esta AaAssgoRr n8a Fos2ae ”" vo ,- - - - 0 8 00 r-�/ZZ— d� ry "-Eo ,a-3a :"as eye og�A OM Id O o Ba 79ta SJB;. �- _ - �8$- RS' ogo i C. I-11.1 • v J_IS LJ g 9az89`E.nZ :Rash=scaa68=c8S:egAB^B86RC=8. ,:_.,o 8, 6n � : "- SR' ^ " �RRRR- RF4SRR«'^AeR-rim� RSn7A�RRBRRRJCRBGFRBBrnnR - aG) zr M 'Ell▪ " //�� 0 8$e „8888888A88dtg, 8888878"_88:888 88$oa 88n.888888s8888w885 B Cr) 0 WN .e..„E"fin«0E- .-_ n..�- sg- e _ n _ .,,R;" - _V'* ry n «Es0 . LCIN " '-` • •, ..n eem n«I ne « m`-'na .'- oo4 R8. « A AA.:!I+ :4"8888R8' 8:: :2Si,81C f-6� • .,.«m.,o..., e__., ..;. .01..,, ,S&R�RRn'7fR28=.gi,,.'8'aBKti' a �Rki,: n r.ccx $=oleRosseet4tasosasoegtEa..e..e�"aa os. -- 0'08 W .. .o o oo.o.e ea800000�"oSB�� _oma_ i. Ci) 4.., ...000.0.0.....................p.„,„JI W V / 07 O?- o z (� rno 870" PV... SA L.� Ivo = ::--- : . "88�:.h " " .a — + I.. I = ma0 .- ms rrrrrrrrr:rrrrrrrrrrrr g ....n .._.8888$$8888885; ' W.r Pwr: u_ ^^— yJ oo aro wn^ 38^,i,i,O88o8..... - eesese ""__ . Rsxxm 8a -- . « !!'!!!:t! ounomposcooveceopeooece ` A75;8Sx8 O31lYld ION S$ NII N.fN.lz.NO 8 ;-"'.: e Jpsz3sn carr rry annYo^riai _is•es _ <-2:a"T 8 'a,".B S.",««' tiq hin e. do1f3;Fi• iL'�a..L ai a°tt i a ies sro p o.00.oto,�,6 �1f:F6 a �•h�'r�i1i'•. C F.e1. n ry = _ ., k c. ' oow'"ee�e oL•__-�_. z ..t.z.-c'.'-a - .jam • _ \' R4.°� "! _ .c•ca..� '' /. --sz-•l a-meee`--, _ - da .:..1.1,,,..' ,5 t• ez oe.ao-xLxoN.ea �C; 1/". �r�� \IA, Ri8 s R e B s." (e 44424p / w \p`!,' r�a4� - 1�1 )`i �rl I li,k so 'sa01,-. .4"sga Kc til I r�C�; J ^SR�g - eR 4.� ."Yy.i,:'t d p 6•n..z erYa.1 \,4'''' i•, T44 C I $o o q -0 8 0 0 0 8$i o '41'. 1 A ''' O_•_.0 YI'9Hi.Y.Y..c l:V \lit ,1 ` �+ I 8• e e o 'S12•m^_a1.-- -- s•-• ---„ � � SL•I 6 !sem ,. � rt. �� •e00000000aed_ _w�p W 11 rod. \�tak'k F ..I J lali OW SA IstS \ , W a a�I O e` 'Yas' _ , El L,q at t Of I >r m i C'i0 ' tri , _ n 8� s,,,..--,.-.4....,.,,n ''h'e ^.con60oo a , n d '' ` __ /� -- J�.--_11.60.••-_ W- `o'!I. 3.W.Y1-m Y 4 3 ,- m �/ 131 in*emcee!Gs k 1— iq 0J111n AINIga.01 a F O o CV g"'�(\y � e 4 1 € , i11 U' a4�. � ,n_oz_e�.aa L-�1® •_Ou�e'aasmm�.r ijwi ffi �,. a, y ,- 000 0 I— - ply,�.r.. 0 I ,''1,�, , $ee W S n� W F F. Wfc i t W I— B:9 x ae� 'g .,...„I' 12 eag s nt. « :' H`22 U 'Z I O C •IrO 7 !: 8'6 to -I^ i - - _ _ _ '3 I hq5` ,.. ,,, • fit: g a 'i;" ' co•.0 a.lc.st.os - - • 'C��m I"I_ ty o o :� . 16a tl£Bg w IR g$5r. •8 I o$�°'r�°�� 't'q'&�' g� n aA $ 4 .-WIQ N _ `� g tangy '-ii ___—1__ '.� � Z. ��,,,e r0 ?� F� £ JO Z 1331-IS 33S - 3N11 H01dW ' ' 8A sb_ 9 w.W1as rrawts �an4 LLI «CM 5 q : o f e .�� f�1tea igl i i='6 !k ; Y 6 :7 so k' S G a "� 83 i'r W o E�� _ -' ` WO ; ,. «��•. ''''''vrr.,.,w m K :11V y.aW� '°' ;;It g 5 g Qa ys . �-5qe u a,es v= W"a `'W .y �e=n ` 14,5 �� !sg$ s $C e�� =Lig �g s �a•3's � u'Il f: ' > � e n $s�§�C��54 ° � �,.: $ ` • �s ek >� d � s.poe �g � 4,-x 4� atiiaI 6 --C3 eig a Jy� 3 ie r ay• k Nas ,e c .7..72 M.. 5> JW - g`1.. - g '� H. ;ARK. E_ d.a= otffts n I i -4iA u Cyt= ^6 111-1 a ori 1 /1'1 : ! nsi 0 Lo 7 "� Ham av71d'odHir W..__ Rif-S1.; b ,0€ N W ‘‘P Is 2 BY c3o:a :.J.f�q� . 4`I A �$ J w x t;:..., # Yit Z =�1i8.. �� a a as`a g-a te �?I gF�R 6 O W" w, g `8=sa d'¢ g. .C 0.! ° O yg3 e -1 5 ..ssc:4,`;°. C]� $1 i gam'{ d y` H� ygiV�A t` pp1$ ; 116.4 F� 7 zo e m....1 W a. .._ r _Lit 1 o + �,.-- i ile Jhl r0 til Cyt I! }� •�`G/ 4 75@!� E EE a '"�. 1� wni 3i": Nil �'� illi-x• d- LL o •zO `e.x Boge:! ; m 1;1yE it$== A L.1`-' ` Wye $�3kEinl � 'e'WW�o'o _ i�` y- 0 u- 1-- �� 5 - "m':.--- 3e...!?,-, «off:, .._ _ tw s q hilt?LZ— n.s a--a"°« a' zis:x.,: s,'= € s 8=�3 '21+� �: $WesW`�1s:` yl eW��9 ' tabs r S 7 is Ps f W o ii S c g O € dgriBR 4.. 'WyE Li i5 i F d'ImAi .$..e ``� 999 GGGG �4 OE e G_`M m s--1-r 2 "3 1'4; N e W---Welts-J# $ g.- 11-4 entizwo = ii b t as,g'c'.i�`s' - g - F Yt t r _ sea•a'`e"e•° m : FV. .,NW '444 9 •a= l f'H n "time`041 .'WE e II`e = ." `z.mm ti `r � �1 t V r o ri5e=nyW°2:,.. .W 4 �"g.3a6:73 kIn 6 s o.> 'Ns:: �� ka,W a £i' W tw€�s=or r�$F ee -€dna= i 4 8A z � t ��. g• g g12 N g gg m n Iii Ylk 1 pPlip I ti' lig41! f pF i.g g p gii ' N4 ligEgi w �� P201 ' -74 5-05 6 q o aye 1 ,0 �� Ftp 20 Cl5N i Pl.. illgd N\., a g l' 4 All 1 € 1. !Ill- it R itrigtE .a Ilg $ P2t $ y 1 � aN SW 6.1 It •pR , a gS s "." _ . e E 5 1 1p i Iii ij kw rg P O k@ "ni ; t `,',�a 2 2� i . i• ia� � Illel $ $ $l:o I9 $a l'il $s ,RQ5 I C:@6$ ;m m W . . . . , fig ; - • " • " f10z/E ..,. p wiCK ' I I p, 51155 3 jh1E aIh! _ _ i iY . ie W .. .... .440—4 Oa )4 2t r _ g6 CIS `= E W. Igi el ! 4 7 e �; o 2 *Pisg sj: ae a4oR�� °Fj U kg 4 ilgi: ►RYA oi, $$ g' "�- , " i . .r.,. .1 a 1$ ;��-��1 $I �a1 g 1i sl 5=r��ss$;� �S�R�ei s e$e� 11; N°�•��sa'�� ,_ r , ge �i seg . a € s .h. $�Ifi$ys,,,8-b " = g a s" y t g r.Fp � e C` — -. ° f"10.1.2,FEE Oign��ttP1PA "9k 47.44E �'��g�8 0 ig X14:P Et egNighiEl :El! a w p �a1° 52Fmr s. �e9 g-ttta'xts ss gg a k P5 st $"<4 e1 . a 8d& 2N _ is3g_t2Ea ti; sa 3`1$ i 5g ;.1 :88C' '3221 R 1 -5 3 (J 2 ?. Ate bhp a- lite \t, 1-1--1 ..; rari.- i g VP 4- WO ( i'A 3} , , (C 0,4,0 7-ir i cifk P.'..:! t Nt 1 Igo Itil, E'EN.4 . -3? A;.11 g E F. 1,2 81 • �C �� e+ �5 pC ,;. 'll ` _ !Elf E St P0.251 eip14 8 • 1R e E 3 s 2 t �a "• 0'6%6 I' lihg 16, INA klkg4 1 �' !!all_p km . W z C° aM 5 63 YEF� � � i 4.�� I'll � ��:s �s1 `��s��4�_ .��l � _._� ! R . a 3 a s p 1141 taN1 r's 11A., iiii )4: S it . ....,... ! . C ! w �._ s. �'._y �.. T IL • 'laq.00YY.l E Po'e� NH .6 DR ! .=.1M JCJR R R Rltll lF t ! wYY i nocfe555 5 5 5 55 g 5 - $tF, a � t R 1 4 d '� 1 1 �1 Fp $ R r .gi' 1�?I 1 X 1111 g 1 N a eR i 4E 5oc5 & ! 1aI� €� 1' @g 1 '1; p pig F44-- €. sF1 eiF y�� 5 € d $ e° E e �z � 9 g$ g @ $ �� $i ' � 2 EIS ` E is 041 ��$ $@ 5 � � s <�9 °�� egg �� 1 � �h s Era 0111 410421 E 1 11 114"154 o 1 liges el 1! I ilii !RI� i I l si3g iig'E a 1 *Et a ggEe e G gyp. p ps °A g g$.2 $ p 105 $!' '1C. a hh�yyY1$6 g 2 e: iC 'IPirri: til 1";;%:' 1 !IA' R ! igei 4113 4.1 � � .'''Q�5•'��72t �� yRg�@5g� eV F iliaPI! �`3i .�. � �> � �iF ��e. � �. CI F1 �a � �5o a Gg'•r� G gad101S..�a tg$ $ Ihi s/ F� !NIS APO 1 P21, nj:�-3 . a2 g 10604400i,° R 4$0a 4IFEE JEba g Pq PAI gen agFgN RVE 'gyp 'AR i a `N S- - R R- Ed k Q" Q 8A j ,; /� I2 N rl '`'-�.- //,; '-/ . / gra // , S/ ya ti 01 N ,. NOILYII,OLNOO xOd L JO 0 357H 3T6 4:14.., /%1 9 / ` ,.•eOS ZNIIHDIVN 11, Q: L__ •mrome ,.44'k,�\ iV I:\\\ �/�l J+ d / �I b t.. r // 'P h' ; \ s\ 1ki � /'� � ef6g / Zr, O ^� � Lj w 1 g.A 4 / .a"I'N�. Jv N 1 �y ` aC// 1 i :irk -a ,�° $ NI ( / a Ur/ i . i ratac 8 I " ! " -'"f' 4' i M " - / " , 4/ 1// ; r l a » / d� 4 / 0 rk F , -, I I IL ,..,,,... . .-i R. dt &4§ In CI E--. R I q i 1IL GG' tl�r 1 rnhY 1 a Lvi i a /Q _ S��YIyyI �� ,11.1 . ill 6 i q - l .. M #0�i a� 8 / I / O A e Jt k a 9r7� C / �' A ~ W O -k on b cr F b / _ /1 �OyIy 34 -t o " O f:.11 } II�Eyj V �i _-�-.-_iG'W! a ^V1 ^Y I`'q�� `� 'pe'ea R E. g g "Y i a3 �E! FC.4L0 Y I!fi I. 1 k 1 ilgl,f p---7,,, - _-- _ ki I 70010 41 0 i ) i gill r`n Fri J 1 it a tyJS r _r1446 of .- $ p /; ; o T- " k t .0 $ '^VI Oa 1L ff 1, 1f y,ti "Ivx mr zy7 kw E • "� lit W 'I p! Ol b e .-1 ' ^ f...i NOLLI11MIN00 404 1 » i :;%" \ate '11 C/a r .i •+q a ao t rates WS ^^11 lmuv k E � T / Lp^ eo aarl Y L AO s J11116 aXX a __.;_.4512,4.___(_1_ „4A- „Y // „Y { meq/9/g,',ng�yy 1 /I ,. 1 // `/ K, '-`:_z/.e..:4, fie/ ^i U .ePMI . / 1:1 h // ye, / 'gym-; 4 \,� % .Avs. © o g �L / t=ig. 44).,!c - ia •O ' /„ � u -g & meq $ S; � \ b k . k a -, ,,/Zb req .i"Y ._\ rte. .. t -oo•W_ 1 .it3 _.mom .` /� \.' a,t_,_.__oret1 a 1O.itm Y la O /-frl ,, o R ♦,�9 4' ' _a.m _84➢£_ -A0_'1 ,,0031____,,,,i, \ k O // . �dl/ i r gy g� R R • iS1, A `11 \ 1 / ,� i' 1.4' i�,$` ,-I 1 CI 9s Cq 'fir g q $a$1 : 0 / ,00• 9T 476 _-- s i 1 [iI rfl— t9 vi a -�s.n- - b0'00 -:d�cv- �.00`f�- -dO•TT- -.uu 6u :uo tt-- a g 1 /I / ,00•tvr a so..lYo x I/ ..41-....,.-.,0741.,,,-; 4:01,,......: a I' • ....._4,) ��1�11"”" �1KCJ4 4 ' $ , pIW g eo>o c* b �i ncQOV ok, // Q i • s / o ge'WI Cs�< / Ss I y — _� _ a tali.A i R. g�” gbj • . 1 u / : W i q '" a�co.nao x ii If R 1 W'Wt 'zh i si 0.A I bb y {.,}. I a :1::x i U / '`n`13Y1413?,p^bb L)3t.MLL.43 m1 :00.1 Lrbbbp§ eetkjo .wee it T4apr—tp. pr, 1 tr.:: I3 '� i8 g g x i� 1O': obf'iPs 12..n qn C AINUE �9.w-'IIIMEMPLE ookRBg$$ intra :r 41.°44 ��g8 6 qq b_ Ic: Ri;nmisinR:gnngimzqnqnnpnnsinpqq q$ SkB�aR��XS "49^W$D:$R:kf; -I M 1T YRiiLLwnniWpiii gnpgnWw;nLRiimiRngWR „i fa�2:_g§.�8 '; 7yt,@ $°9"Bg:'saRss.eRR 'k.a.... �'._�F ";4. tl. a sl tgg E llgt„.11 n.intsa a tttngagnanla$Z i1 RH88FR.R22R421=V*R2 an-a RRstl 9Al+Yf_a n $ 1 aqu�so5 99 t ��, e� b � a ;24$3.4 g Ri„.4k# 9.7bGw A SAX$-rg a&RAS t _.� `L2 F Fla_��bg$E R"S-RS1A;S` 613.#2."4"7"2"14;"""X"3 $ h' 'Oasis-Om n I tN � � $Q i€Fa^$ $ S i- �•I�� g5® g�$ � �� sk,�k,-.,�L.bY§�: $.. ' C). y mti A$NP+PFe�o^no N 7+ wR:.t.1:2#NilYw g'9i� trt,'wa. ^' Y S�t ```, 4. rt! y $tB pss ssaaaIa'she-s !.EVIsS..22; -s� fagp�sp�' yCkikm'� b �I�`v b1=1..$.b0$ �e*bp i '� IntNkb�ib co_b6146bb4...70 1 a 4 b vtF" '' a -W aY - -l..$.�(; b-mn..W- 6R" �+ r g NKK pp -��:3_1.a...,QBY$Y..kgd_Btgk..,Sry�B$69t-a �$ E �Sek� R k�8§$8 4w V �Sgrr-39�7g�+Sb Oy�+f�S9S bFia -$..1�°$no�Soo7S 2iri a$of;h EWMbbE EI V8s $8$$-8$$ $$l$$$$$$$$$$$$$1;R$$ fi8 $$$$$So$$e$g$$Q$$eeo$$8$$$Y$$$$Y$i:UJ I ..;....W»;k4i :.....n R Paillggg �iassl3s gSssssa sg«gs&9glsa as ImAgsg8�ss Rs}Ri�sssEsR1s.sxa411fti .t , < .-1 tl �7 A9S59G9939"5 (_-333g'l3S5B A I kvunacvB3G::oma:.,:uEnigEEEEHEE�t7Eli'iEEHEWs3ai8ESEE0EilE6RlaelEglIEEE3fig •�` a ra..,.x 1 8A m I�h,},{.yy y, ►►YYY.......stt►Y ry Uf'21 IAS6PPbnNb L�6btr Agli Pti:4 41”N1414baobb' a '`'W y, fi 1VLb ti cs I `27 Sk h$ ahs ac-_ S-nO`hBy s s mkskonE4 ::: "°s9:eEEgs•ct.ti iiiNiFss iNExa:Ysatxx x.i. k g� .:zmammmszs:s:zmmszsemamn.mmmmmmm.ssr.mmzzsmsszssmmmsmnmss F c+ Z 41 gig d, _-'m4g1R:s�c'ssgi kBBd'agRt95a77;ecaha4xsis`ARRkso4,'n$4n.na$ A �:-aak$.§e Gal »L!a >..:aa W ..._.,884...48 U§l Ci n w. ..le w .1YYYYY ha VE11 U I o k8.$.$ttkkkiihak{e kk B:e:b-Ektbsest>-sBkkk tEtk.k..as.:;:,':,: .01412,1441*= NI Q rd U ido4msSE^:SS:8843_sSncor.iogt 7XgS4S•,Y87gE42._..,. «,. -dgisivi.., O :. Itggg U $Skoith'8'2� $ °5 NI 1 i aamm!tr e:.o k ..ko:1w=.2:ka'ofimogtttzio.t°2km* -kky�k- I mn !ill!6 i m �pt8lkix£$x�gxZkxli5lexgg.15anIle t 2CiitiiitAie _11e1isxo7� g;33a35R333H 44 O �e$$$$$k=koo`o$$$$$$$$$$ •R,9?ksRekq$BBBB.kkkkkEk88.$ta$$kk,". O .ae8aea8Es`s-"alae:sesse8a888888aesks4440�.,t.'e0k...:„.4ass4s8s Er 6.. a iscEEE55966EIEEEEEEEEEEOREIgl inEgaBidme666assoc&MM!!!.N. LY S` R 2 C __6.5 1 a A n.00 9 a-MOSS C 5 :zr415 ..r - h u1~-I otr y1 I i .Po'D21 I to G U D N rF 1 d� / Bb0i e a y�W 0 c i t 'u' .---. te I '04i , r 1 wm ! r - :ME's.__/ v. .1 I- ?�V vouenwuao Noe a JO yaa�ts su i. i - ?;',- IHnoa . 8I MOHO�.1 ' I C''� 'r AOuinntuxO:aot n AD r aasxs aas �AII'IH�1,VItii iS a m t - •a.r :+a.c 1t a,.,arm 9 SisII'IH3,LVPQ t I I Po9� €. It a . D�t' r..ES-__,• c�3 01 1 Rpa O `dy est _.�s Yi'sE 03 a I.I a JC.cr DON II aow�ip �l1..��.�, I b'1 i•- m 6 1� vj I roar i O 1 aJ'AfinON a D r' \\ co . 1, I r. .9im a'._1 s�y?1I �,�Ippp� I .TGIF 19 '9!9i .. b' i I AO'aal " M 1 F. 0 Q.g� d 0. '1' -$-- Yom- r•�a \ y__ m lel i s f9.srpo x 'x o. K i- $p `a\ 46 \ /V .� •et 'C.,7--, . a ��/ W 9 JD.91AD N I. y K y •\ "Y MCC, 11"9,b1 CO a B. Id 1. 'a, k _,,_T_.a%--?-_' dt ♦ 1 i\ l///r5��\`,..J/I .9omr I M 6c t `��• ' ,?Gt$L! .. `� Itr3 i$3 •pours 1 n T --- `� e g 'C�•' _ co ----) 4.1 ce3 ,.,., I a jamas x a Cit b9 I __.4Lr.0a:ar_�_`�\ \\ CO .Po'o'r I� I 'i CO •.1 O t g l I racmDo c'y1- Fad+ t[ t€ �t1 1-2"4 a 8 1 as•ozi kr i' t 1 r SII-2"4. 1 a,r.0.slao c II el -I r nal - I ° I $ 1 dI .00S21 2. = I c9 r 3 ea I •fa0nsa J 6 p�pn, r��"I N, .9pCT r -y SI ; 2 F710Aa N Li li I F•' A CO11Aa 6 I 7, ��-rI V i I m I .I N ' C O .9 J 0 l I I M .00"9.,4 I U a no a I t x a I�I��O I$i a p) e. �I I .DOroar oI I i 1 1a91DD a q1...IN a �BL� m I 0 9 m 8 I N 0181 .," f,c}aalDO x 4 CO I ATM l r FD.sIDo e I l�Fll o I IS la_r r1 '; L oit ; .Poo9r I s aaaslmc }FIw r' B Po921 g�„ u Q by .$ 1 6666-- 1�s I d _ _ wi P�y7 i I O$ '0'!5.2.,1 IiBI$ i A tc.NNiAO a r - I a .OD.9:r a I ryI^ I.`I a oa0"Popo a I km$ I CO I9i m •I .9D'9er I ' Q 61 I$ .r I I r Acorns a I I I $II . e 'V,, -' • Imo`�] Ie 2s. I $m a Aran �, .ai Til P I a r�nn0 a I - I O i$1 �' ; 4 A.tsAOD s [I 0>7 I E I a.rA 9DD a ✓ . w Dcvz[ CD `' ISI ' 1•'i. 'Osi 1. "g o -1 IB I„ I 1 a d9.99D0 9 Y 1 5 '' r-02 I R. a.29.f�D0 A I Ir '�t8 C'2aJ 2.29.11.00 M -/�.Vl a -d I ~r..1.1:0S.,1•0 a I 9 a.rsea C .`. '51 51 I 1 ! 1 .09' I I I. \ 1 .94'59 .00'Po ba/ I$ N a I 1ill. . P) si p I 1 1 .+1 --:fig__ _-_-- n II'-' a JaAIAa a- I 81 C �i l S d "1 BI a s' 1 _ I .1.8111 1 I 4 m !? h ` a mfID0 N , U INj a * 1 a J.aa IDO 9 I "as1 j m $' 8 11# ts;1 $h 'r h a - .moat 7 e i I-=D�--� I t- � -�a I+::�e a m �s t..k iso !�--�- � I .1 M 1• 11 i, 3 s tit, -n -o r.y IDg P. 11 I al in ,. .-1 1U ,�\„____ .•.I iJ m . -'11 '1...1 P.-' �� Cr r pI V N F 8i 0 a �� \ ,9i_aF T*T 9!Y-r.a'ao _O°_S9__...•41-4,;-_,,,,k_____ , / ,� .00�a 11 E $ !! Y 41'''.4 ga 'i awn TIIH $f12LLI �__ '9� .a-n'•gy .I 990 a.99.0100 N S2-' 02 I _.A['9c---AM __Ds99_-_+4QPf_-_805£6__OM._POL_O° K 4 / I a a Yw r = ri ti ; h a ry4 O O Is W Y01 c$� r�' ,n sr ^k ^k Se ek $*. Bk e'a �,$,�r (P(R�Oy� 081 I 4 Ir, * a� ge Csgs � E; Wgn O«s " 5.y ' L� 4 I- tib: ITo'hrJ - Aa'hr Lr r - -�' ;'-lcii9-----�e'ks---:09W --slrse---31,80- -.e9•FC-66.,0 1C -Wail Cele •y / .9F'CLL I_CO MDD N / alz I h / i. (Ne-1.6 AOPd'Oa NOON 101.1) • / IIF a n saa�ti PIw4 i 8 A gi __I' .,.9 /` Nour aaLNoo am 1.do 9 amts sas y I .�-I I is- d I NouvnNuxoa SW t AO 9 LIMNS ass^ Jnr$" // IaN31 asr8 wawraa) 3NPIHo1 e'bp�/ 61'Jo e.09 i ,1 I m a�9110o x J INTIHD Ld➢I m W �r ,.a. .Lava,L & 9]., _ �]_�� ] c 0 i h m g x _ar. „00.''',,r05 P 1 I •r.c.o e6 x I h dl Ik e �±ar.c�'^ 6y9' mi 3 I •u.m0o 9 91t 7 a Rx' s lit 1 mE91 g ,09 oat 11 's 'm'a6 9P.� 1 O+?P y�•II m I 11`` p1��! g� ul $ .. .-1^31 4 P 2 9 l(1 1$ x' 3 CI 1 b 11]w m $8 b y b .-1 "nl F a u 992 c} I R ti I R s �t $ 1` S •--1 3 k •.1- I I.,� I , Ir., I a�.c010a,1 I1 8O; k:191 f `I k o __,a-- cI s6=ao• 9,"I1�--�-/a.rwItl--.9--'J IU� , .99.01 1 5E '1� N� ¢ .--1 �0 .-/ '1, ]1 " pn° Ila le x.11171,1 1111 1-c a'` o �su � ...I ]'_,s0. �_.- '!�.�.� �NEc11�-!g-- ,ae91 -a.88.91.00 R E-1 4 v 9:� s iR 3'qn`�'�c'- ye as c1>e_L_; 9L1-.94'.09_'F -191- '', g 114 Y AC9101 6 1 �C,�. '11a101 F aNy-a. td 4 I in i I C &.1 Ir pYS�F4 1'4 89 n ��i_.. ' -:?- R li I'- O 1. ,ip R oV .ills V ,WN" 94_ -� 0 A 1 1 48 819 9 II. si i.8999.00 6 I� p3 (Ry11 - -c)fa�J ]]�� Y M D 1$• O rl �5 -06Ea1 Im Ar091 Epp, e , I 11' J• 1y ON $'1 r '~ I Ig I 9F 1$ 2 CV ,1g ISi o.;8 k 94 m a + 1R .s.o `- I ! coW I2 sit ' `141s-_ [� CO 1 4 C 1 R... - -.�..J I.-; 1 k O.k O g b a g1 I1Q Q ./ ' / 613 1.8.9.91,00 6 n I R I 6.8.0,91.00 Y I .-I ,, C 1-1 8 e O^ ^++ ,6 .-1 yyy w ov -'. "��I Mal d +9L V N 'Pl, I I c V : ' ml "�. --__- I4 .."-. y00 08°9.10• U _7.4R�.0_1_1 L` -4PL`'R 1''*'"49 9H- e�° w.9 cul I , ---.Th'dzT--1 Rr 41.4 -- ---f. i �n al oii 1e7R E Ct00 .1 In all- y _ _ ' 1 x.8.8189 8 I I Ip I 8.8.8.89.00 9 a WW i t . u ,,- Ott Li .vo'on m Cr tal co Q F ; .d / $b a,1"6 11.tO. R, O P o E"1 03 pp / a I ,,,,,T.„,„„ 1 I �WWW„� •.ce.9lao e w N 0. . i ael .W'Oat =I9 g&II(-(-�.- MEM I E•"1 g ';::"!...4 .41, t�{pc�� a - , mi i,1 t4 ? ''L..116'. I^ I/�~y� Ico ps{ �g \ - 2y 1 'I y L� 1 x J.9(9.91.00 9 1 co L 1 RNTIHOJ.Vw . 1 )N3 .i inoq st znoxD•_` y��g c aNTIH3,LvNt 1 I NOLLYfIax.03 3.3.12,do E 13914S 33s E 0) II,,, 0•'9/�,LG010I 1 -♦ a I x.89.91.00 a �i 1 1 I I NOLLYMILLNOO a0d x d0 E 133136 MS I w 1 t 0'I.-_r mw , 1 a� 14°00(• \� I 1 ----, - I L COQo e 9,i C X96° gt� y1!t. ? CO o I I ml S Co r . \ '�Or'(C. 1,flj, b1 I e co o Ii 1 I !.� so•9al r r o ;1 �' \ 1 i.89.49.006 0 1 c ` l I}" -- ,90'061 1 V . ' \ 1,..;\ c. •q• ll•, 'I.I . N tl 19O 1 f 9 J{.9 uo N A -. • •° a3 i 1 . I so'ml rl 8 ''. I Jx91d1 o b$1 p1R CO kok! O Q, ,;\ 9b "'d1I CA 1 8 I x JCA100 9 '1 Y M " )- "..F.'ISI 1 R I .90'091 I y t \-..4,. .,.7).fit- ' 51 9.1.X.0.909 I 94 a 1' Y '��•�1 w�-1 �' �,'�.. 4-.1;-\----- 1 .90 gar I I� S1 CI ,kl r$ ., g 1p .0,9.8.8[.00 6 I O U K „a I ap0. Z I .ron i2.89.01.0 0 iL'�, .4 3 AVM11Ild, gOI ti 0..19 • % Ip I, x.,o o 6 .I d 1 $ Iw .09191 O I A.40.91.00 6 t 6611.. 55,,,, .09'9.01 WOW 0414 lJr4p$ b u VO M ri;WOMSMI N.9 b13Y,I):�€IWF.P 413"t."Vtiip b§13bbbf'''' 14''' P 69C999919994C m99999 .99 8g.�9m5s -g..:a9SYYSt X0N0skg..8a0o"90&mOZ55AZmgk $k6 ..... nmzmmis Rx.......ziiSSRuiRmiPRLZRLLiRSmzY.RSRmRRmRmzRLi SznRpnSLzmLlcYoibgp g AI $�ikzsas�gt$>l9N$•.it...t ;k44i§o.$a$e,gRGA$kg9Bg's,Rt9aaoRca)„ $$$$ .$'_'n.nk$;:a:4g^ie y� Pgmg>3AdARotor. a"e.2S800:-..0RSR9"4Er! S:&$CRg9t,91.'4w-°$oS:Solg-"'+'R9:g`aF;:w945' .1 k tz t 'ggfitc-g-a3"sgkss.$ tgsaGa^twsgg:"skk:gy°askttr�beo2S.So$n'g"G1 :akhthl'44tt•tagtsexs U, OAS�1:.793g1;3N��p-'1 Sw:e2CS`$:Cg,R.RS=A86f2,1it�$Sa539'8GC$RR1&."'tN^B:>L1:gSa S'4C.GIB9:o`'SLI:&S98a I "'1 Yw40= M1 llbk01i4MSZA..^.�/ bV�XeN &nWbxbbbLbb N 66i bo�abaebin b{{.,��4yy ^41.'bt,bb :..Vin �. P �g^ 1� +:9.P� Pnn nn �en L:INE !sl`iBSsittliAgY9'd^" 3k8"tilliol8"��"!BPk8s96kbltnit?traratiiARg§gliBggi9'ks -C 6_-s $kg99$omoe'sago"BgBgB$BgsBgsbC$104. og$ $$$ $$g$ggesg$g9g's,g'k$Ctkiltks $$ $g,$0?. fi&^ e neacxatigieeegRmmaBRagaifila>'3'SE,.$1314SSnWamw«Sn.,RBSg$41#;SSFS lEEEE$??R33aG!'1gi6EBES$age!BaE:-us::Ys-uaaaane!catz»xaP:!!!!na: n!sss!oexsaga9xsa I.I,.,P �� ccml,9�mc�„cmmm,... ,,,,,,,,,,,, mm,.�9�.,scsccmm�..R Is!'!! s"llla$=4`!$g mss Pmmmmm PP Pmmmmmm Nsss§�sgg0,,ohbpi b?E` l1k:SBtggle I n YRYn......zLm I+ 8A 1 I Sae^ satResa7f�- b 1 OOe S .L bb i6yb4L ti e b b oi ei h6:1b 1 elaateEtwati m " "gt; snuNo.gt liii oEr.:Fid ~'" d4 >KtttmnmttftYZnntmtmmnnnnnniKtittttitntinimtWi29090iWWmmmmnin96m9tt901tmmmnmi "Y 6tgiau6bcnsnt COI A pkat' ktr4Vi kntWk$ek4WOq - .-" skk"21!"4A ". Raa_2s. '' SS :SW«ErtggRRSOSge@:S?ZSTINFXARFiYEFrgaErnX9:45EIRPg7gi lAFAR7iARW889 re gg,,,,,Aiir�l$ ='!.90044k'+.R4`�""'7��-gg71RSaW-1;kka&RO Sia a4P.k711-Q$#'iki33Y�hk'"'kBF:$ / ::f,':`7,7,:::::::.!:::!' 0 13sogR:mHSS.o.. 'n6"m9s.Ses:sg�85 tl ssos R:ggisovilin,-A no,xsvx.;4gABR1gA=olls -go 6OLEfntsty,---% �1 L.�1rL L}}b.!,b b b C) ,NF1. ii"Ig:.kL R - $hkh ldl ttn It fIN)11 � O r b b Lob - b66m6sa.nkh�,-_ 44p R., � t��r.� $ -b�'S�$Big$Ix=9tokako ��$k:� U :ntm::t>.mmttntnttmi ti I° " " 55."" 1""Egil "EIN4111 ""� koEg doos"ain""5"sggealinhaioge of I W N v p _kkkkk8$=field;k$ akgMkkSk iWE.Wka$akkkk8k"$kkkkkk"""-"""""""gasaookkkmkm _fil m iTi3'33SS3399J33 gggroopip3_5,333`3333333$ogoongsa aaRseala;paaoR Sagsaltggo^s s v i $ afdR z3°g3aglig! arias:a°a®P,=FPSPPtxt•..rasasa.®!a !suV°s!!y,iggiEgib"noallimgm 110' WIDE FLORIDA POWER ANI) EASEMENT (O.lf.ODO%lYY,PAGE 20511-287 64. llii — al o — " // _ .asa4 Yr22N1 f"`I _ — MP!No]iv3s]IIN / ao .0. ,L3VaLL //A. _ '__ 4 8 / / ` / l /O` 2,47:-L----_� `\ 0 C .. t1 i V ‘4.4,W14 Ey ° / K F ,buEe4_-.-. _.Ir .0,47, •1 oe • 1� ..F Y dl tcr� rl \ ♦ p co s. g Z` 1- ....04 M IQ I .%\ 'r.,4. 4 \%:1',4,4,, 1°.4164 4 V, E.° E ‘ ' '9 ' * c.-°-$ • ‘ N w 1' d (lam �` Io i('-' { ', \ ''' `� \ �$ *".P. D d °� '^�{ 1- r t ' CD >i 41 C.5 H1 Ed, *, 6 al & IVy7< `��-(.1.�i/�\ �yb i \ .fe+$\l Q(0,8,+ \ .. {, N f ,y O K F �' \ �e'�(fit 1?�\l\ b M ♦ • �_��t'�'/ ,„ m $, ` 1` co [• i $ ._ B \ ' 'tri \ r'-`4, °` 4, 4,47.„... '4 A rr �. Z 1 w On \ R Nr.s,-,\ ,g•� ;° 8 "��?.EIS Q E a emudM r y as '`4,,,z/' „ `,54/'v U - .01912 •i .11,0 -- r-r a X111 `\ Lam' /. / ,, moo' z / 72 � - .-unTe - 7.werne c �.es.ze.p a` =o� Ky`�".—�'�/ a �'P� ` ' I .'AHI IHO L r •- / "�I,�+r�' p 1". ...t"'1 =/ S N0LL\NNLN00 au 6 40 E rcxuE Ea �`i \. - ' /, IS/ �.� yJ/ 8 _ 1 4 / / �Fp / bri i3 �._ ` �'0jnyy� k� \i m ~ / //i f i 44 8/e1V f J4lTDO N .00.4 * -� ` \Y L // �? Peg -0DYtT — 1. 47 C��I At,„ y Q W.9aIVYg� y\ AI i r 1 ai i/l / of tkiP w I ij ".".'.'.'.)2 3 .1'F i 14/ m -11-,,-,-,..„--ya4, a .`-e " \ 8E.. p „ // .1 Fk rl b6 8 A 1G`p''W Pettk*"11'"4 -tt" hhb b b bbu,t, uu bbb Fb a ho 1: kb b bL b I I E S k I§e ,.'47..c 9 k m, k k'a. ,,'s'_x ; : k $'x ttlE k qu. a s� S mnIk§xEnF^ 9a:.ts kos8^ sAv.'" t ;? gkgtF nqa"b ""_aka gd EreWW.X...2=YO1'kgOXIO..o..$Cwkoonlomm, w.namommnkkdn.".$maftsmk6vo xn K..„..wm"hb.wnnnn===b=:=:q=:=:=n=bbnnnnn=::wwNwnwn=n:"bnnmw„><:a::NNnb====._:__ H$Aab:'s.sM"oza 's:3:kggoa"s=$ �axghb}-baba- b $ $ 3eci �1 n A �"sg_RR4a�;g®kgR�k4kg4P AtAn'�NLWkile.00 � R%SRaf(e^.,4„3vRa�88'neE$:Cx7�S&m�^.18:ee,C9EnggeA:=7,Rnege:3AGR3YR:81..74:21g0-egoRX.i- 6 C7 A�1=" _ n t, 4g!;7 4Wa7kGSs'`,N.eB.g�A#Sp4'wrRSiav44:0,S$fi:asan4i4i$;RO#Sk tikt1W4S41.4Cg FIj2Sr8 :,° $ 0 P=W I O ' .. ..� St=1!aSSq-.wRRRP1H3 4A«f�Gai1RSuRaa�2oaiR tJaaA: _ _�� aR Ci I Elba>rophhl6y;Tantilqtb3 tWalsbgbk}}W�'b bY• k> f y y 5 M1 h I a �+$g=~ MNhi.AFwbi.hbb ,ii'. P.P�i'P�i•�P gnnb-Tn§ d'3 b1o3gd�3 .S��9ie�6g b�S��ro Nknij.ri yop{,�d�i tN-1, �' s" inI c�ssigs'iaZ1itio111Iirig' EMMM11gi1:41113 Ott € El; I A '^ gae..8 ?�RP6 $ANtngmU k Q - g $M11kk04agktikOi $gi&gokkbbktiVs. a ag O R 19YI CESSss�= $$$ gb bgg$$gggk9 $bg$&88$4mlogiggg � � ��"��9gRic56a8g5q8�3��eka�aa^ 'aaa��3-�e,��g�`ssa�sa_�gsssa��gse��asssga�g�gs �: «w.,Y..mwmmwwYNwwwmwl1h,,I..}}m.k.R.,.. bbt3Mbb661,�}3o1!ib >1kP 4P'� yne E-+ � ? 8'ssms �eg15gs ssc dkM ti - n n nn saQoeoaaaa �a3gg' s xc Ra � saa.= s � 1 k��Cc �Rgl �$ al�is r3 a ===nn=:=assn aww as a.ec====nnw oV. r G3GGEG'uGGGGuuuGuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu igl§i 0 11 =1E3EnE335AR55ESEEEIEEMEEEES .--1 j I /� N... I. ,d -..N. ! a 'n ,'t im]S'g ow r \[' ..,\ C`` r'q i' r 8 M /r!,,v r-- 0 ti ,t5 tA \\ ,,,' b�4 O /�� .g� d��`� 7 / , q'! N 1i! I I a aa.9sm n I I ` `'/ In i I �, L. .90.OG1 E CA \ S., 'L- *//� � s 4'' ' , M / I 1 `° ira N a eti// ``\�I �� 9'4.r,`tN Cl�/ o In /7wwss,, s \ //' N ~ / pp / M i/ • 7 l.32.9130 s L.T- E+ �`.\ /4- .��N,,°'(f, 4 /ply i 2 .M. / O y. I I4 1 30'oa1 I I .."III '%i. 5 g, '\ M 4 g it "Q� ,� CO d , g .''1 I a.,., .moi wu/ T & 4 TP ,*'%1 y>• _o "i �.y_I p ie ��' �I 4 NOILVMULNO3 vas 1+! A swam s 11 2 JO L z / c h7 'i'� ,�' J• / 4 COM 1 .sam a 1.c.slm N I i m'2cr averts>u T K r a°' d3 ° L',.. a44/4.44.424;-221,!, .'ms s 1 of OM I I 'rg tzrmaivw \�.! 1 e `I i �44N6 /�� -'1-~•rid 5,"'.f r'''''' \ -1- 1Rf" .M-r RI I A I 0 O R ...� $ 4�8 co 4 \v°sq `'7 b / s, eo,. C. .,Z u L¢I TN-i-v-„„„_,--4 L I .F.! a...9130 N• 11 o�` /'.` O E„�,, g N ~s�W e •ae -�'6 '.7[ �t�'• •`'$4 - _a co' Igl _i �p.� Bl Ci h , e m $, J, N* / �� : / �-1 ;01 a rs ,., . 41 W 2+3. .�a p O ” -q \ u t--y , q/� ' h^ ... �. / �•/ SSI M 1En (qq' 1 / a undo x C7 2,nLsrm x N W / ic '/ AO'fn I I� O oN r I l� [� -4>,,r/� /.(4P e . �7---*, g C�17 I M ' tlq ` \` `--4''' ��0 / ?eb I2CN /Ar A a m'''' 2 (� i 2. .9id0 N I1 .�1Z 32133! —I m /7 I A,y�,'@'a, /4, g ,may �I li"Fa 1f1 R Rt..:. 9 M / / {,� / a,a2Alm N I Ey a.113130 N I ....J k q ' C� O'C01 IC.� AO'Oni le • e ',�y /. il. o 21r '/ t gi' l . aE-IP. 1 - i1 sal in W t / /` + / d Yya cs.nm a 00'9ri a 43.31.00 N ImOI °I/ Pot / ^ I 1 .1i1/ � / „ •U1i �` � i 0F / 6 $r ' ACS Ci 8I $p I g I .- alw ,T, "41 3; a d • I. dr i'�,,'�,_�- �$�bB/y/ .A 4 /� m'vet I Sha N •^s^o q ^i/ : ial e0 ;7 N p� / f b I ... g?I n�1 r, sXI 'g d m /o,; ^ d. n s 1 ... "a1 $i =e, ' d1 b �S,� 9or/7�.`'�1—-f..v// _1 a 4.2.9130 K ki. I.+ a„moan N 11_.-" V� �/ s t �' I I {J_ sI . ('f +.^OOQ,r,` T^ "(+ .00'CCI_....11 I .Dp00i I�``- t"w 8�/ dM' ??, iif I N jg1 L 8 .g �4i 4 / 3 xolarnytwoo sad L JO s,2ZIils ass 2NfHOy� , - 2 iCAi 1 x 1 I 2.=O N l NOILtaMlNoo aQ1, 0 / / 7N d['9e1 1 I Nooal II L 10 I,yL'1!S�B y/` r1 / a,a•121 afw �' / N gd $ 0 i t' /2'g !j� „^.Dt's>21_,Y 1I�• & ,�.sf C' [� '� l __ m YI 2 a ii.a,ao .1 I '' la .•t, • ,r I �. I a.39.nmN �$ isa / I r2 -.1,,....:-.1 try. > t>>p - w b 51 O 2a .9sns1 1 30'99s • 1 a!7p ,I 'Ll c \ 22 s1 0 :4 I I 1 // n 5 'n-'-`1-\ '' `3 !� �'� coW �= = '� S o 0 �' i 01 r O I�• 1 ti $q e-1 713 N 211 1$ __ 2 1 L.J I y9.91m N /, • �__ .~. X11 1, n Ct'1> ra its Y' aa',, a 4.3-0130 N mol 1 1 I ^-.\•+ n l l _- -XIV' + —aft a1 •Be'e9t a a,ll of N $ _2 ar la _ 10.3 � 1''3- cue_ aua_,yt�2_L�—.33.7.3- gx; a te.sim a . /I 30'1 ---1''P-`41-,./, 9Id1 c3-• '�Pt1i'\-r�>p[a y -- - I 1 1/J Gel aaazl I r( ^I 1 it ip6 - 1 ry S� I Ina 'I -I. I _ .-° 2p- --q'2-- is -LV O O As I a J.c.cim v .a 1 a.ce.s[m 9 I 1 "'O 0:.b ••-e •--. m l .90'21 1 I A9'IZ[ .. r1 r I 1 1 I 84 9] rN{yci 1 _ b >_ 6 b V�y % _C p A- 6ppa.�," 9E & '�h SE9?B eek ��^S d $opm"9XN aNn z W `tn^pREiliF k""BkaSfioCdoas �"soi:iiaglaaaItigislsre_ bi i..9o:la:YBEig m.....cEanxm ..A...wZhnnmmmsrrih.tihh.'mm......mmmmm 141344.6141344.660:6l. ieuhnnhhh h t qq di®_r.^s:aar ei°3i9 4k.'ss$8kt iAkii $- t-b:.b•- Qbay.ohs... A,: a i Ci CI, E. $ fj:�$ :,e dSk w'� >8,akp,a$J_$osgd FG ig n .gi °'""141E1E1 a da88sa®ssax dx9x�s__a n4 s^B�oesaax�_ee.gse• °m$ Th li W A A $afg88$$$$$ 6 'S sd^.x^ae asG3d d o111 n W c�FX�Fiigl�fi$3i{i9k S:i .�`°t�`��}rAy;dk2i'6�9C�8�{�ne8��'ioR6�R®8��gi�•3o FY � B �e *:°ellsitti liihia,�ShiaiS.,w.. .i]k, i12MIaaxaetpaaggegggggp sg, okkk's�° bmk„$kn$o$p 6 Ie.• ...,16hrhh><h><4444ehw. < h' k°pk'. �g$$$$$b$$$#�>_ tibkl$$g$y§_gekbkkkgn$k9b'� ask >; $$kk� k$1§x bbstk 1 CI = 688.48r. 8 4-44^4x7;44 S8444. .'8s5552 g8g3:1 PtP4.�4`- , . 4 iatt§EN _At yiNi $s3g33m§sag333 O sss,s aE i -=.$ $8 $ asA §g $ $sesse$se $$a$ $ se$sasssa $ WM ;800e$ E. esassse.tttgeteraeE3soqeg aEsEgesale§$pas§eesge eeeenseaaelg$agisa Z. V w 4 U 1 .8 n 41 ?� S 8 24 V' o S 110' WIDE FLORIDA POWElli _•''''° E' (ox soox 0ea�p7os ao�E 'z..5' \ O E.41 K 11 It:�� F U< ' ) yy m Jr 0 a _ w p. yy nrrna.rr COMM ND.a TO ar u. ••1 p.y/ a g 8 ^ wAflri9 veal aa1tWW'nOM or red- {�L / ° 44 0) 1 e Orem'c =nr�•.•. -j y '/c I 01,9a M oras'• —664 or \\\a 31 w {f_ 1{ 1 I _ Iv ornvr r 'A I I • F i %\\�I IT as o R ge EI w ' x 9 yI h � o RZi se2.0.sai — ✓ I rip: I _ b di, 941 co • C1 F / k11 I, M \a alb / 'rp. + rr` b••r i . Ifs •S'e 'r I $ p / co 'J)II a a.'y b be 1 + +` a .§tl I_ ea...":`,7. " a,�r\ weinI • ti 1 / r N r < p/ d' ` -r.•'',r ash g N / i` �+ r a /n r ~•? /� `_-; • `N raw ' I is- 6 < c �. t.�,�, ,/. t,a>cb et/ . is dr i o '-or9.'; --Ir — CO • 11 'L \ .tia i. 4, ,,• / N // • 1 i • root I I s ' ` 1b A\ y ~ 4RiNN � / a . 1 ?g\ ',../6" � a a /, hIko o o � 4 h / r1ea / ' 1,E / 31p t., r1o / , /„ ] , I .r00ehI $ 1%`\ /°4i W' k#r 4. Bb '7/ a C'3 ,.+ / O I I I. tl~r 1 a c- / ,4,-,* , -' �4 Ri go ' U1,_.. ,....„ I 9 b 0 10 J 'a{'a S /40 „ a.a.9ID0 a Ii &NI-111D ' X"\ ,'y CV $s k �' ,ex»= a.u.91ea xI I .90 act — xOLtYMnzHd:�ea4r \ saps 4 r- ' 8 $ kr% :I '-' i`go° WL . ,� R 10 a•up s aas . 3--—7 f r. -, ...�+9'16t1. r- /"'',� , a//ate/,///{/'y�' i p k, a ��' 1 \\ •P,r ,may 11'III +++A 0AP. .,4y k / O •Kara. L aaacc IU ' $ r 1 P °'� .90�xrI VI CI 4 to2 IN IArii.AaAIA1. IY9'a:I BA 41 4 i. aid a ° $ I �� ' m+ eck q'ly f iM !SB 8�< k�2°'.' moi/ Q. r ' CI' e 4 t�b� .y4a tq /X E t4 o atii LU g a i. a 4111 ��jt �4a w 6 'I d v3 'i °' Av,! .t gra 1Cki E hi 04 4 e � a Ole o�yc4C ttd4 Mt: d k Q, Ii �i4 a S ; �t; � 4lS� a 4 .r ati kq R t r k I ! 4 j Y s .1.. Y�a t tem � •Ia � h EP '� t tea . '4 Ra a4� tial a, i- 4 4 £k is w t i e r v r .. ` .a, 41 C 4 r �a�4� ; ,N ...1:: m, y4 ei t i > 4 y k a t kr4 �' ya/� [. C E". &° r ,so ° ; ' i e .�4•1e it r 9 d t 4 Zr Ilibi ♦ 4 $ a :y es C a, a ast raa • I py r y kyC i 2 °e + 4 §k L hUh a w b a a Vw rrON' I p, txrxa;. p ! 1 �4p y1444ex ei Y g O Q �i7 RT Q r-l.' 1 '9 i t ~'l$G 4�� a "' y 2<�i� 10 ib�l .@ O ..i € "r&r • E h@ k 4R 44k hog a'44 8 o a ��"�� fro y- -- ..— , 4 : pi 4' x, k 0 kr 1 :�jQ- r 14 $hp �''` Qtt 1 -1 4.1 atg . W.' h' tP y o 11 �'_ , r - ''• ( i t % i ' 4C 4444 4444 t$. s'°atk Ct NT //tiN -'- Yga `J8 r`" r 4<y4x ?rJIP I ' /mac/ 5 ko 5 0—AttE€„4$ t° s..-ae`agt— 1i 4 4oky yfi4at� rrx >ak<oi p• 21`: 4 1, - I XS k i 4h (.'� r 1� r EE kt°” P�\+ Sbyr ki "'4 i 011 1.. I..L_ ,TAO,. eut,,e �4..kw44.4io .47 w.'e4tot3 02Z.t.% 6.4 t I _y 1�'A: na ly 2 t te$rti1 `4 $parwtlik'°x$ .g14ytrt �ix rtt +t �y_. % el- o�4� F4t4�, eRak`akFM44 atq 14 , g4 �{4jtPaaai,,4t a eeeZ'' e 40404 �txp .. OaLt k@r e4trlt 4x y'x.4g4@hk1g1 .N-;. .°e8<'k.C'arw�•oW�a t Ott g 1,4 h ' 4i. r R Q a a x 4 k. • 8r 4°n hit R3 `Y4k E `+ gk 1 a h. 'n: < t .. kL•84; a 4 ,k. S 4 hit t@i 1i?1 t,e1 a 4 : to a >�: t o$4t y" a$ ' R $44 yS :4� a J� a; 4 t`.t4 8� key b 1 ihtt 4 nub` tth o e 4 3 n. e. 0 h a g oda$ •R7a a � ti 4g 's� �g' 4 -,'a )Iia �a baa s sa it a>R. E a .';rz4 �E - a r R VQ `�LL ��s ih� a a `t grl�3 4$�av t4i 5 e� 3a tl 4 k V�1.9 , a ~4a a 0 a rS,St 4 <. 4, 4 4x r r >�p4�pQt V 4 e , {{$ e.t '4 a w4 ¢e1F„`.,4.f3 g yaridz1 k 4 �• 4 ,e�a 3$. f °d : aaaid �.a ' 14Y��S!7� ady4• i �>3b °t4`aw ° s a iVe .i.4 t tqi e,ts -. I` 4`•:43 r4C°kl4 4 Mak, ar. x kt4 4 s 4 v hak t..`a.° li4 4`ks 4 4i N t Ili r t xr�4t t t x> �� .e 4 � at;y�4 k i yuy° P yg bkx w .1 . N 4 rhaa �2x a.,x �Spg$ In 7t x 4 y ~a ilk t ` 6"eiag � xz<4. 'ak 5 I'• N a v ` atkry4h-li a$ ff ,;4ti 4'�4 1 ' 1 I d k t 'dg E4 A4O.<ka Ora , a 1a a 4 4y4'a� 4 kr x' r d4 A 4 e 88 ,t,t kty yyky.efl £, i$"" 1 @�`.a 4 vlp Cwr�t x ��..o a3 yt d'� a(� 4atuti o`� i � ;i'aai✓C sFNt �S *441:3411111I4-40 °,h4°. . aF 4.W4 4 .DA 4 �i4 e x '. ! t ! AlA@ d x 34pgpgpgs Iyg`' `' R .gik.a cl ss yy ror44 ° >g �44 ,i� i3r y t <•4°ta .aca� dr t° t t 'ii ay t lax 5 • tyq,4,�ax�` ?5�°r4�t'4�$., CZ. x > $a @;& xt`tgS, &oty>e . w d� R4 a<ta rt at 4•Qa sZ4p'•ii'4° tri" 0 `i 1 4 R eka .gae4 .ttttt,t4:::� � 4, rx Q a a 4 .,gk eke4 g : e , N E .$ , ,' � a � t t k � d8 � a ra ��'a i � v g��8ec� ,..„,.,,p, �t < szkRaa4�el4ed�8.a3e q Qo�'P. I a E , 3 �sw xy et ax Dpp 9 po: Six ay yy�■• 9eaata: a ��4 li V.N r I 8A j«wwF e,;ceWg uel�.YrYf„. JJ 'W,P,",,, 'W z6 $ !4dry ;';4 Bw1A'47 .n%44, aU O u „ 1 ,a") ; N1 „ttatte,, . kottk4mutnn);; n Y Y YYYNInuv;; Y; fY [ t OW� o ',kV Ja \o w� y ^ s„r_ i*hc = aasua__ "sem; xs_a2a .h :N Ct I-- ,?---'-_ 2 _T rili4,4„I 3 xc2 J (n LOO I d wR^nn�nXAn^ ° 8t'nN$ R9 $F9,wt” <v R$JR^n arydp d 000 MO, f' W r. 01-t �'' 1=`- a�a��ri5i,.`R�?8R .tR3>S'�Rhg:.ReR�kRKy.'`,ih..cro $ om::,.' dQ $p U w ..9:�hYh. = eERffiA -x{8$8:='3,-R�a.,,:;g:fkR (f) I!� 1 a R�. O E F 4L 1+a�y,; P^ .. h Lal. '�.�gg8g88n�'"k l - q t. .._.—.._.J....f._....--. 6��ti��M1^h__Fidpaa a2 p7S6 \ F 30 1 133HS 33S . 3ra g , \ 1 888886 $6$$8$$$8$98588.§8$88§99956696886p�6 'eh J 130 1 1331-IS 33S - ' '� `'� fi^��4 ; s8;;ae> #� � "^„tix�k� as t �� /! \\ \\\ Q 6 Y-wn.nw.ee?:6:1!"aw`”' IMIIIA A8RR„PAUII Ee9:: I = U 3 /•' 7' \\ \ \ fet I.i:.f. 'i=':1;-� y v \\ \\ \ I t ebb - / 4 ,1 ' I 6:LI 4' U \ \ � .c.urw•t � ` ' —_ --•!O � \ .. ,..„----____4____ a -0 ..., ‘ ;.. ,...: 1,, 1 ,.:, \ \ \ ,-,,......._ 1, 1 i 1... >,\ -., z,,,...1 , 7, ,._ ..: \ \ ; -... a\ N I ISi o .; i P 40 1 13314S 33S r 0 \,\ ♦ '\. M1'.' `• ,{ / 1` tlit t t 3 d '\ /!:. -fli it ''\ r�,�r / r t / !r j\+o8 / II JJe.”'" + \\ j ;: ' ' i a5 y! .ID'rrl 'N.QLir1CY 8 '- ! ~ -)1 4- \ ,: ,......„:::,., gg PI li/ ;I is.' • I. g. .'. 1 I t i C k 8p8R."B fi J J �, t 8 �R`"o ' '�°\ '.4 r \ .. a 3 8 *,'""*"--Z14441.11 f:, ,RA" &d4a 'r✓ b E h 8 8y^'.Rn .e:.- / t VII 1 kt. 1 +_-__e..... '_ ._p _ / ./" e girl ' ..t;, E8 m GS$ 1 - -m,., -r— .._- inet)mown I:? ....�.� ti` ! S*__.i'ers 'I K'=1 --- j��YY a 1,,,!i=aln! ! W g j4; 18Ri`f. I^2,a. , ; e _c_l�aat ! k tzsri �s v r- 1••f-.n R Q i $ 444:414 ,!:.1: Y ti • 4444,1s J• : � `. W 11 ; I • I rt:34 —L Y 29.1 !4y.8 •!.mnrl M.ir.r,]Jos r f U •. . 10 w' a 8� Yf'y't:i t * Q 1 AI 1I .imi �h�'` Il! g : ! in tc- i.: I 51 p 1,3 PE:c . :-,i // . :i t ' dD�:l dd.td.° §,'jg I A J o. -l " i .is r e,ornrms „ff%r.ar t,.W.--"0.4.9.1,It _Ylt ...Ls + _ e , I T � .1 16 �p01�;8 .er e,r b -----e r -' I.�`�` y'4 lddib° 5 sit 1 Sg 6. iii li N1. , ;,— �" I I%.-•, s Q �1 I � . �..y-•�. .1�—�'_'_—�Yr� ...y__�_�y /RO) .Kbl/ ...._. ._.._...SI 9J�1'.r' .'Clf Zvi 1 8 ��w• 1 4\, ♦ — —._f2i_-+ -,--x. warm,10003/savrnT""� ...IT me _ I j ,r" I ..1 I .- ., — .. ...Q— f.iti i Cw lNA11m �.t. J ._._._....___-_.._._.-.� ) •• .• _ • 4l,Un.01— ,..,41z,,„1.^,.c" '].A•.<t�n I•_--•_ , .A 8A � pp }� 4 kf Wiliii;3"'9�:'t0' S'`4f: ^ the�' 4'p; ;2 WIL R''::�Cg�aex`.Rg: "" $'Rx4tRR� iiiti�ym WN q YLYNN'„uNwu+YYv) NN?xNYFoin Y YYYYY'Yxa„x a. Q w p g$as°° " stack $big '•eka�We: eea4ka�b�:$ ca , � � '•M Q 2 4b�•t$F641;'RGafr�M1 =AP28$8$BA.$=� i.•39=-`:$� 6151 1 Cr) a-s z W i'd,X83.",. .eAY�^-m_=�''R°•Z�^YY°�:�i�X?R.40 ll s, Yo= Q oyv +1 , . c'- z m �►� rn a i:k , :,� •iah rye e`: R ge 3 e a ; o v ti_-, r /�` -. ^ka:��Rk .��:� .a.u.-ale en z r ^ qi: :Rash m I-Ll :mtgowg14 .sR_gIlv4ARa_«voaa ymtxa� 1 1 , s_ ,n0.g , :: boa. . rg 3 0 �...r v a`c$$$ `s#fih$tt n b le �sebFAbk ,�kkkk s l - t$$$$$$$$gWilitss$'s' $$$$$?$$siskii .e$P ' w agoRs u4;40Aoquzig ok g ^yt��of ,:. F_n, '°" . ""^n,.o `xRnA4&AC;A .;R ARriARxRRR zzr e • P 0. it 9 — P.was, w,mrtma i , RP - kq ug. -� .,, --error ,,,,i,6_, I� miY .lam \' i �. nv , 1.,,L, r . , N.sesfi �� ' �rr • ii J -.. __cc a4 U _ 1.4 i , � W1,' 7�raw, A`'� i I ,Z. •,�q„+\ �\ fel G•:�cr�_�R.l�._ _ aoj d(tl r_...�_ a ,1ni ;I - __ a' s.. e !5.w. II _- \ i . ..--' 't 14 V.. s \ IP 1--; ,-4- A) d "- , ,� g:?GNi.Sky pir;�• (r} •. �yi� 1� L� ) �� ....�..r— -_lal •, o e U ;'.*145¢1%' .` . ee •n' 'i' S / ; IOW R $� 'f ,.> \�% °.` ` �. I� ^` 7'I _ fy3�/ s_ '\ V i 8 I yy! _ ,` it.f'- ' `� ♦ �tl .`i ki X71 -. € $ 'it- )o qt � r�. ►,''`\ ` F 1§,!, I 1g 1! - - - ^ Y4f 33 �..;_.�..-+' o +:. `yA. ,F, ti, I '1''': j sl 11;1 is I xs.— I h i I lN /i �3,, _..._..�.4% . ._ eerq R . _. . �I C aF.�•a - �a ail ,. Ff.o a � i '`\ 'I %� ' .."� �`, I ! • F.* y `_ i �� I .rororl 7sr.slmn a ~ r ' � �\ • R's r l L W V aZx }I 4 e p��`M.�. j" `\ , ;'a I .............. - II g ti !Ir___.... V V ! i /1/ . V ! C 30 Z L33HS 33S 1 1 7 / r IL--.. 1 Q ORDINANCE 95- 62 -4cco r q;. Ste: t ... AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER S;= N '" 85-15, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE VINEYARDS OP NAPLES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AS ,.. AMENDED, BY DELETING EXHIBIT "A-2", THE • . MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WEST OP I-75 AND INSERTING A REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT1A `�� PLAN AS EXHIBIT A-3, AND PROVIDING AN i EFFECTIVE DATE. iv WHEREAS, on May 7, 1985, the Board of County Commiesers4 s r approved ordinance Number 85-15, which established the Vine • AA of 90; Naples Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, said Ordinance Number 85-15 was previously amended by Ordinance Number 86-63, approved by the Collier County Board of County • Commissioners on September 16, 2986; amended by Ordinance Number 87-44, approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on June 2, 1987; amended by Ordinance Number 90-78, approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 1990/ and amended by Ordinance Number 91-75, approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on August 13, 1992; and WHEREAS, Michel Saadeh, President and CEO of Vineyards Development Corporation, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend Ordinance Number 85-15, as amended to replace the existing Vineyards PUD Master Plan Exhibit "A-2" located west of I-75 with a new PUD Master Plan Exhibit "A-3". NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OP COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; • SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO PUD MASTER PLAN The existing Master Plan for Ordinance 85-15, the Vineyards Planned Unit Development, as depicted on Exhibit "A-2" attached hereto, • is hereby amended and modified as shown on Exhibit "A-3" attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECT19N TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -1- EXHIBIT . Mil• gA .i • PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Coesissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ..1Z. day of ;Vgl r.,r..� , 1995. j I • ATTEST: • BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERSDWIGHT;E. •BROOK•,..CLERK COLLIER COI , PLO• • (4BY: • =ETTYE . ; TTHEWS, CHAIRMAN • . APPROVED AS TO•YpRIi AND LEGAL.,SUPPICIENCY' 1. . , ,...•. 1' ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY PAA-84-30(5) ORDINANCE/15535 Thh ordlnants feed wt* IM Socrepory,{ .•s Offer i _ and ccknewie9'R+errf that filing ret brad fhls s dam, i Dy i 1 . . —2•• • s . 8A • , nik• , 11111 , IIIIII , _..............z_ li g i i g-w v - , 1 1 p . . . I ..= .'.1 NO'.." `V. 40•••y % ;la, 1:34 ‘74VVIIIIIihi, :Ili i i 1.14. 1 Va. ijillii 1 ill 41,1101.' . I , 'I.:. IS .- I' =II I ..IMVII.Alk: 411. =MCI II BiligiliiiilliSi •!:\ ,I! VII 19 1=4; .4411111 IIIIIIIIIIIIMIlell, :I. I , a. h.,/ ...,6„ .• ,lik..:: .,PA 0 Iti ,lirrnultritrmilimmi, il • •„1:: =ft_ ,. Wilimutimittimimi I f/ Ss. : "•::: :FE !iit„.„. 1.7„,,,,,,rumr, I • 2 I .0.. - .: =•. ma.e..• -4:: , 1.41.1111' ! ..I :5.11 -47_,:i2 '..71.:.:77.1:f ii,..:,-1. „01: '; z S.i'.Jzi:-:' f-;• A. 'il 6 ' t---4--tvo . ,.. _,....,:,- ,-,:__ :.1--,74.• . •.•:..-.....- _ _ --,= it., ...1 f=17 "...- _ -1,.7-..,4 I igi Os f IlIrv; 1 0•i 1 U"• .' LQ) co NOIStWirr 3207in-1 olla 111 I . INZIT3SY3 %1.1 It I . Cta 43 MI ft •, Al • % Z i; k 7, .., ,,,„...45t 1 :. gli,,,,A1 1 i till 4 firal zi 1 1 .140 ra.1 NZ% itra) S 0 V 6 t ..„„, 061 . ./t...) . 17::3 1 i• \ . ..,a al ft 2111 sbl, prod.,Nrrnd IttOcititY 11111 I. Exotell-r A" a, ,i 1111111 1: MM. . ; . .,.. 4' — ..--. — —. 8A ., 1r . fl - r ¢ s. { 4. V/ 1 +• Vir 74` 41.a111111111:DItk- Ii! t s,�nnu�lilio'ue�i a t Q •� ..... • 111 1O1�p1O;44. �.c1 111111C1i/1i111 ICC1I ,i1nnulnnnu!1, ,! :�1111t111i1 ' r 1 minim 1rt0mini API' g `. �/i1111111111111UIlii ; i • o moi= �i z:-.-_ 'i Ainm 1 ......-7 '-'.--•.:--...",-",„,q;;;.,:,s, .44,09. i: I ., ;= 10' • 4.1 r Jr1/3n2sv3 dJ ! 1 , iv i 1, 1W,i/A. Ili lig' it Uric 4 40/"..' ,�. t:u1iIlt1111 IliC. IC ijl „t111I1 1 �:}t 1 �{tilt11 711'?i II :IIi1j' l Ii;I ; 1:11 i'' 1,II i1it �� 'fti'tq �� inti li �f �,,, c 11� �i � tt'� Ftt 111,t i}sirt� ;,;, . . !' tilt' �i+ =fj �� NJ., �,i oven' Jb0cRYW ,,1113 J 2111, get IIIIIIii , 'Ii ,t1r Expiiir ~A-3" ll�t.ttilli t�iil iUUt1 'Jul ti$ 1 x i, • i, t.l i .8A STATE OP FLORIDA) COUNTY OP COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCA, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 95-62 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 14th day of November, 1995, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 16th day of November, 1995. DWIGHT B. BROCB ''..•I•:-"7 r. Clerk of Courts and.t•ls k:.. ''.._,••••%:., Ex-officio to Board...W. County Coamissione= • • . 'f;:...., ' ;i$:9 s /s/xaureen 7eyoi" ' • • • r Deputy Clerk• '.'"•�o' •,', . E i 1'. 2046793 OR: 2173 PG: 0260 8 A '. ,, . 11C01111 is 0TI1C111 11C0111 of COLtIft tl0llt, 1'I 0411!1!* at 11:3541 111141711114171. , C1111 ' lC11 11,51 10C-.71 .71 lits: fibs 111C1 IIT AL 2141 C0LII1 GATT MA1U&T 1315 Rtsennu�allstCrumart��To By: Will 11 33!12 iket 26�W'Golden Gate Parkway,cSuite 315 Fuss No.: 60 001da 151�Z Property APpraleers Parcel identification Folio Number; 6 ye gey)0o '0 S Qurr CLAIM DEED This QUIT-CLAM DEED,Executed his y day 4'Apri1,1996 A.D.,by Tert*%eiu Cees.in Jej,ba.,anon* Corporation,and The Groves of Naples, Imre.,a Florida corporation,both having dtrira place of business 7900 Airport Rand North, Naples, Florida 33942, herein 'first parry. to The Groats FttsJdent's Asa c . Inc.. a Florida not/or—prop corporation, whose poet eke address is 2490 Old Grows Road, Naples, Florida 33942,herein 'second party': (Wherever used herein the name 'Gm party'sad'Mooed party' imitate all the ponos to thla ieetrumaat and their heirs.sept teprM/etadree,and amigos of individuals,and the ..- ..•. •• mime of c rporatioas) WITNESSETH: that the said f i ,,,s , ern", s the sant of$10.00 in hand paid by the said second all party, the receipt �, claim and • �',whereof it hereby ackno ,dr the said hereby rparty, ., �wina Ice.piece or rs unto the said second party of land,situate,lying and being in the , of ,- • . e , Flo ,,to r.- The old Grater Road, ,M; ; ._116 ,:� in Book 29, Page $ of the Public Records of . ' , 1 Pt .nit:. .. 1-4 Tracts 4 and 5,Piper's t )- Phase One, : , •a . the recorded la flat Boric 20, Paseo 97-ft, inclusive, �k. Public Records of a. , , da, and Tract 3, Piper's Grove, Phase - • T �. recorded in Plat Rook 23,Paseo 71 -73,inclusive, of the Public • .. . + ' , Florida. To HAVE AND TO HOLD, the sante together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging on In anywise ,and the estate.right tide,interest,lien,equity and claire whatsoever of the said first party,either in law or equity.to reTnainingly proper use, beset and behoof of the said second party forever. In Witness Whereof the said first party has caused these presents to be executed in us name,and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed,by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year fins above twines. A7EEST• 7', - • , Cotwamennllies, Inc. No. 1 �.---- - Printed Name: . A'A .S firJO D4— By...mkt t ' . James . W , —, President ..,;. ;?.1 ....,, 'Mated Name: �i /11 r) ll .'rh.F.,.‘i 06 t k G (CORPORATE SEAL) EXHIBIT 8A March 26, 2002 MS. KRASOWSKI: That sounds good. Well, I'm going to request right now that Zero Waste Collier County be put on the agenda under public position for the next session. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, it's not -- not on today's agenda. This is something you have to take up with staff. And at that point in time we'll -- we'll address it. We're not going to be able to get into a lengthy discussion and set an agenda item. MS. KRASOWSKI: In two weeks, I mean, at the next commission meeting. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Sure. Would you get together with staff on that? MS. KRASOWSKI: All right. I'll do that. Thank you. And please, please keep your eyes on the RFP situation. It could -- could be very damaging to people if it's not done correctly. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MS. KRASOWSKI: To let you know. And thank you. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Miss Filson, does that do it with the public speakers, and now we go to the petition? Item #6B DISCUSSION REGARDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE ORCHARDS AND VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD — COMMISSIONER CARTER TO CONTACT PIPER'S GROVE RE INTERCONNECT MS. FILSON: Yes, sir. I have one speaker for public petition, and I'm not sure if he's the gentleman who has the public petition, Mr. David Strouble. MR. MUDD: Commissioners, I have the public petition signed by the residents of The Orchards. I'm handing that over to -- part of Page 36 f EXHIBIT Y I I *** OR: 2173 PG: 0261 *** ATTEST. 7Y-IrfVd4OZ- T, ,rp Naples, Inc. 8 Wi No. t ,..— Printed Name: ,*v Se/e# oZ#"' Hy: ��%� A. ie WLRAThSEAL) i • - . .,4.2 t ��j� /r Printed Maar M9%bl i.1 C. 16i AAj( C# STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Subscribed and sworn to before me R,Coi • of Touchstone Communities, lac.. a Florida corporation,and President of The Groves ' ' R'�, Inc.,a Florida ., . , who is personally known to me. and who did not take an oath. WITNESS my hand and of is - this • C1,° '"" -1•4011,i s.,“- (affix notarial meat) cI • y-. .T:rt y •mmissi•• . .. .1 • CRY t : STATE OF - • COMMON NO.CC2017411 tOrovadQriCLim.NO Apra!,11006 2 8A March 26, 2002 the record. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you. MR. STROUBLE: Good morning. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Sir, I'm going to ask you to identify yourself in the mike. MR. STROUBLE: Yes, sir. My name is David Strouble. I'm here in place of Mr. Bob Gentile, our normal spokesman, who had a family crisis this morning. At 7 a.m. I received a phone call to pinch- hit. So if you'll bear with me and have patience, I'll try to get through his notes, and we'll get this taken care of. As you mentioned, we did turn in a petition this morning with over 500 signatures. We were here last year. Bob was here. The situation has not alleviated out there. It is still the same, if not worse, due to the construction, the -- of the new city out there that's called Village Walk, Island Walk, excuse me, Island Walk and beyond. The amount of traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road has increased since last year when Bob was there. We still don't have a light or any relief to get out of our community. He has here in front of me in his folder something that he would like me to read to you. And with this, it says, Dear Commissioners, the undersigned residents of The Orchards, a community located at 7857 Gardner Drive, adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road, petition you, along with all the county commissioners, to address the extremely serious vehicular access problems to and from our community during substantial periods of the day. A lack of highway capacity and the growth along Vanderbilt Beach Road, in our opinion, has had an adverse impact on expeditious emergency services response time. In addition this, traffic situation has also seriously impacted the residents' safety while entering and exiting our community. We have our share of older drivers and first-time drivers. These residents are Page 37 8A March 26, 2002 at risk the most. Our children's school buses deal with this condition a number of times each day. Approximately one year has passed since we last came before you. Since that time a signal has been installed west of our location at the Tiburon and Naples Walk shopping center intersection. The impact on our community from the signal has been negligible. As for the westbound flow of traffic, nothing has been really done at all. The community is united in the position that this is unacceptable. We cannot understand, as we begin the 21st century, that this problem is insurmountable. Regardless of whether the exact numbers of vehicles or statistics utilized for traffic warrant studies meet the established criteria, there comes a time when good old common sense should come into play. Once again, we come before the board seeking your intervention in this matter. We implore you to help us. Do not send us away empty-handed again. Your intervention today may help avoid serious injury or loss of life, either by vehicular accidents or emergency services responding to our calls for assistance. There have been a number of vehicle accidents, incidents these last months, along with the countless calls for emergency medical services. Therefore, we request a signal be placed at the entrance to our community. If this request is again denied, then you realize you leave us all at the risk of our fate to our well being trying to exit and enter our community. Please do not send us away again without any help. This is not a matter of convenience. This condition exists, and it is a reality to anyone who travels in the area and is well aware of. We need your help. Your attention to this matter is anxiously awaited, and I will assure you I -- it will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. That's the letter that Bob asked me to read to you folks. Now, before I came up here this morning, he also called the sheriffs Page 38 8A March 26, 2002 department and got accident reports. I stopped on my way up here this morning, and from April 1st of 2001 through March of-- 21st of 2002, there were reported 284 traffic-related calls on Vanderbilt Beach Road between Tiburon and I-75. Now, I looked through these while I was setting back here, and, of course, not all of these are accidents. We have normal traffic stops, suspicious vehicles, but there are -- I counted in here, like, 26 accidents. And many of these accidents, I've noticed, are 3 vehicles, up to 12 and 13 -- 15 on this one of accidents on our road. And that's one reason, I believe, is because of-- normally -- well, not so much traffic, but it's chain-reaction accidents. So you can see by that that there is many, many times that there are so many cars on this road that I noticed this morning getting out. It was difficult. Fortunately, I do not have to go out every morning to go to work here. Many of our people do, and I can't imagine the frustration they start their day with by having to leave our community in stress before they even get on the road, because it does take a while, especially if you're the tenth car to get out. And if you're the first car, you feel unduly pressured to either make a move unsafety to enter the traffic. And one thing about our road, being it's only two lanes, is -- I do it myself, and I've noticed many other people in our community do. We do not have a median. We have two lanes, and then there is a small section that is diagonally yellow line that is basically illegal to get into. That's our safe zone, my safe zone. There's no traffic coming from the west to the east. It's coming from the east to the west. So when I have an opportunity, I jump into that safe zone, be it illegal or not, and I notice many other people do. But that is really not what we should have to do. As far as widening of our road, which we do hope, okay, that we will get a light at that time, that is maybe -- maybe the second quarter Page 39 8A March 26, 2002 of next year, which would put it a year from now, that they may start that road. If the things continue to change, such as right-of-ways and different things that they're -- that change there, God knows when we'll get our road. Livingston is down the road. We have no idea when that may be up in our area, and they will, they say, put a light at Livingston. But that is still over a quarter of a mile away from us. So what you have here is a situation of lights at both ends of our community, but it really gives us no relief because by the time the lights change, the people on Vanderbilt Beach Road -- and I'm sure many of you people out here and I know you folks up there have probably traveled the road, which is a 45-mile-an-hour speed limit. As you-all well know that 45 down here is not 45. It can be anywhere from 55 to 60 depending on who's behind the wheel. It makes it very, very difficult to get out there, very unsafe. And I'm here in Bob's place for our community to tell you that we definitely need something there. If it's just a temporary light and they can move it down to Livingston when they do Livingston would be fine with me, but we would get some temporary relief. I've driven by North Point and Vanderbilt Beach Road going toward Vanderbilt Beach. That is the light that has been installed adjacent to Pelican Bay, Bay Colony and The Ambiance. It's a great addition. I'm happy they have that. We would like to have the same thing. The light there -- I've timed it -- I believe is a 15-second red light, east and west for Vanderbilt. What that light does -- and I have come the other way off North Point. It gives you the opportunity to enter safely into the traffic flow. That's all we want. That's what we're asking for. And, really, we would like your indulgence in this matter and give it some consideration. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner -- Commissioner Page 40 8A March 26, 2002 Henning. COMMISSIONER CARTER: Commissioner Henning -- VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Sir, sir, before you leave -- Tom Henning here -- how many -- as far as accidents, looking through that report, how many of those deal directly with the residents in The Orchards? MR. STROUBLE: That's a good question. That's something I haven't looked at. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay. Because that -- the segment that you're looking at, the accidents --. MR. STROUBLE: Well, they don't have anything here per Se as Orchards residents. You're referring to the name. They have addresses where these accidents happens, Rose Road, Rose Road, which is our road going up, Rose Road, Rose Road, one, two, three, four, five, six -- VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Maybe we could get together later on, and we could talk about that. MR. STROUBLE: Sure. I would appreciate that, because it is a problem, and I know you're all well aware of many other problems in this community and city, but this is our problem. I know everybody out here has a problem, but today this is my problem. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: And, sir, we want to address your -- your needs. We really do. But putting a traffic light maybe is not the -- the best solution. So possibly there's some other solutions that we can look at. And I know that --. MR. STROUBLE: I'll be glad to talk to you about it. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: One minute, please. MR. STROUBLE: Sony. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: The original PUD, the Piper's Grove is a part of that -- that PUD. What -- have you made any efforts to talk to your neighbors there as far as interconnectivity so Page 41 8A March 26, 2002 you could get to Airport Road, because there is a traffic light there? MR. STROUBLE: I wish I had a good answer for you. But since -- like I say, I just got this information at 7:20 this morning. I really didn't get an opportunity to discuss that with Bob, although we have discussed other items. That is one that we have not discussed. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay. Maybe that -- because that will get you closer to your destination. Let me talk to those folks over at the -- the manager over at Piper's Grove and see if that is a --. MR. STROUBLE: The only thing Piper's Grove has is a new light on Airport-Pulling Road across from Emerald Lakes. So Piper's Grove actually has two ways of egress. One of them is with a traffic light now on Airport-Pulling Road. So I don't think you'll get the response that you're getting from us from the people of Piper's Grove now because they have what we would like to have. So once you get something, you don't -- you're not as adamant about it as when you don't have it. Like the kid who wants a new bike, he wants that bike until he gets it. Then he lets you alone. We prefer not to come back next year. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Thank you. MR. STROUBLE: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER CARTER: Mr. Chairman, this is a transition community, coming into District 2 from District 3. I have had one short briefing by transportation on the situation. Does transportation want to comment on this morning, or should we send it to them to come back later and advise us of that situation, because as I understand it, there is an internal community discussion that could take place that could get you out to Airport Road? But that becomes between communities, is not something that the county would not get involved in. Transportation, I do need to get a brief input from them to see whether or not we can go forward and do anything with the situation. I -- I empathize with the situation. But transportation may Page 42 8A March 26, 2002 have some other insights so we don't spin our wheels here. MR. OLLIFF: In essence, I'll save Bob the trip to the microphone. And I can tell you that we've recently done some warrant studies there and -- and they haven't yet met the warrants that would justify a signal. We had hoped that the light at the intersection that was referenced at Tiburon in the shopping center to the east would have provided some gaps in the traffic to be able to allow the traffic to exit The Orchards. It in all honesty hasn't provided as much in the way of gaps as we would hope. Commissioner Henning does have a good suggestion working with Piper's Grove. That's one of those interconnectivity opportunities that the county probably let go years ago when they split that PUD up. But there is an opportunity there to try and generate some interconnectivity between The Orchards and Piper's Grove to get access to that light on Airport Road. And, in addition, eventually the -- the four- and six-laning of Vanderbilt Beach Road will provide some additional opportunities, as well as the installation of some additional lights at Livingston. So, obviously, from a transportation standpoint, we are going to try and -- and resist putting any lights up on your major arterial roadways that don't meet the warrants because of the -- the impact that it has on the arterial. But we are more than willing to sit down and try to work on some other options that are available, including perhaps some interconnectivity options. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Henning. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: I know that community borders on the future of Livingston. That is going to come on line in the next couple of years. MR. OLLIFF: Right. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Is there a possibility that transportation could look at opportunities for a -- another exit off of Page 43 8A March 26, 2002 that? MR. OLLIFF: Right. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: And, if you don't mind, I'll contact the Piper's Grove people over there and see what the possibilities of that -- that interconnection over there. Commissioner Carter, would you -- COMMISSIONER CARTER: Well, since it's in District 2, I feel it's probably my responsibility to do that. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Right. COMMISSIONER CARTER: If you have a file on that you want to pass over to me -- VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER CARTER: -- I'll be happy to do that. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: I'll be happy -- COMMISSIONER CARTER: I'll contact both of the associations, Piper's Grove and the other, to see if there's any interest, along with the continuing studies by the transportation department. I think everybody here empathizes with the situation. MR. OLLIFF: Absolutely. COMMISSIONER CARTER: That's the best, I think; we can do at this point. VICE CHAIRMAN HENNING: Well, thank you, Commissioner Carter. COMMISSIONER CARTER: Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Thank you both. What we're going to do, gentlemen, is we're going to take a five-minute break at this time, and then we're going to come back, and the next item's going to be for Henderson Creek. (A short break was held.) Item #8B Page 44 Code Case Detail Report 8 A CDPR4204 - Code Case Detail Report CABE NBA: 2005030408 AO NBR: 267061 STATUS: CLOSE INSPECTOR: HEATHERGRIMSH. LEVEL: NOV CASE TYPE: ZONING ADDR NBR: 172898 LOCATION: 2480 OLD GROVES RD FOLIO: 0000067955003506 PIPER'S GROVE PHASE ONE TRACT 4 LOT: 1 BLOCK: 4 SUBDIV: (1442) -Pipers Grove Phase One TAZ: 57 PLANNING COMM: NN ZIP: 341097669 OPEN DATE: 03/10/2005 OPEN USER:BIRESJASON CLOSE DATE:11/10/2005 CLOSE HEATHERGRIM DIRECTIONS: CLUBHOUSE DISPOSITION:NO VIOLATION CATEGORY: PUD VIOLATIONS PRIORITY: 0 LAST 924719 HEARING DATE: CONTACT?: DESCRIPTION• PHYSICAL FILE ID: CONTACT INFORMATION: TENANT INFORMATION: GROVES RESIDENTS ASSN INC, THE GROVES RESIDENTS ASSN INC, THE PHONE: FAX PHONE: FAX: OWNER INFORMATION: VIOLATOR INFORMATION: GROVES RESIDENTS ASSN INC, THE GROVES RESIDENTS ASSN INC, THE 2480 OLD GROVES RD 2480 OLD GROVES RD NAPLES, FL 34109-7669 NAPLES, FL 341097669 PHONE: FAX: PHONE: FAX: COMPLAINANT INFORMAT ION: NAME/ADDRESS: PHONE: FAX: ANONYMOUS VISITS: VISIT NBR INSPECTOR SCHEDULED DATE VISIT DATE REMARKS 890791 MITCHELLDENNIS 03/10/2005 03/10/2005 OLD GROVES ROAD HAS BEEN GATED AT BOTH THE EAST & WEST ENDS. THIS PREVENTS ACCESS BY THE RESIDENTS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST. ORIGINAL PUD (VINEYARDS) 95-62 THROUGH PSP 92-06, PIPER GROVE (STIPULATED AGREEMENT) ARTICULATES A FLOW THROUGH PROVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED. R/C 3/14/05. MJW 890889 MITCHELLDENNIS 03/14/2005 03/14/2005 40 MIN - NOV WAS PREPARED AND PERSONALLY SERVED ON NANCY DEVINE AS RECEPTIONIST FOR ROBERT SAMOUCE AS REGISTERED AGENT FOR PIPER'S GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. SERVICE WAS MADE BY INV. JOHN OLNEY #55 AT 5405 PARK CENTRAL CT. R/C 4/15/05 JMB EXHIBIT s Collier County e Printed on: 07/03/2016 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT ?age 1 cf 0 8A 891369 MITCHELLDENNIS 04/15/2005 04/14/2005 MEETING WAS HELD WITH PIPERS GROVE REPRESENTATIVES AS WELL AS CDES REPS FROM ACA, ZLDR, ENG.REV AND MYSELF PRESENT, PURPOSE OF MEETING WAS Q&A FOR BENEFIT OF PIPERS GROVE H.O.A. TWO EEK EXTENSION WAS GRANTED WITH THE STIPULATION THAT A STATUS REPORT BE PROVIDED TO ME BY OR BEFORE 5/2/05. R/C 5/3/05 MHL 897237 MITCHELLDENNIS 05/03/2005 05/09/2005 40 MINS- A.C.A. BELPEDIO ADVISES THAT ATTY. VAN HISE PURSUANT TO F.S. 119, OBTAINED COPIES OF CASE FILE. ALSO, RECEIVED FACSIMILE FROM VAN RISE INDICATING THAT MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED ON 5/13/05 BY AND BETWEEN PIPERS GROVE AND ORCHARDS ASSOC. TO DISCUSS A MUTUALLY SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION. R/C 5/27/05 MHL 900700 SYKORACAROL 05/27/2005 05/13/2005 5/13/05 CASE TOT ME FOR INVESTIGATION. CALLED CARRIN CHANG TO ADVISE HER OF SAME. SHE ADVISED LETTER IS IN ROUTE REFERENCE MEETING ON 5/12/05. NO FINAL RESELUTION. NEEDED TO FIND OUT WHAT ORCHARDS WANTED. ORCHARD REPRESENTITIVES STATED THEY DID NOT INSTIGATE COMPLAINANT IT WAS COUNTY. IT WAS ALSO STATED IF AGREEMENT WAS MADE VIOLATION WOULD BE RESINDED. ALSO CALLED CHRISTIAN VAN RISE, LEFT MESSAGE I WILL BE HANDLING CASE. EMAIL TO DENNIS MITCHELL C/C JENNIFER BELPEDIO R/C 5/31/05 LS 902434 SYKORACAROL 05/27/2005 05/19/2005 CALL ATTORNEY VAN RISE STATED CARRIN CHANG DID NOT MAIL LETTER TO OUR DEPT. AS SHE STATED IN OUR CONVERSATION. ADVISED SHE IS OBTAINING COST ESTIMATES, SHOULD COMPARE NEXT WEEK CALLED MS. CHANG LEFT MESSAGE WITH OFFICE TO PLEASE MAIL COPY OF LETTER TO ME. R/C 5/31/05 MHL 903908 SYKORACAROL 05/26/2005 05/26/2005 RECEIVED COPY OF LETTER FROM PIPERS GROVE TO TOM CARMON, PRESIDENT OF ORCHARDS HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. REFERENCE FIGURES COMPLIED FOR COST OF ACCESS TO OLD GROVES RD. ALSO COPY OF MINUTES OF MEETING ON 05/12/05 SCAN COPIES-MEETING WITH COUNTY ATTORNEY JENNIFER ON 6/6/05 TO DETERMINE COURSE OF ACTION. R/C 6/6/05 MHL 904536 SYKORACAROL 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 MEETING FOR 6/6/05 WAS CANCELED, NOT RESCEHDULED. MHL Collier County Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 2 of 8 8A 904555 SYKORACAROL 06/06/2005 06/09/2005 SENT EMAIL TO ALOMARSMILEY(ATTACHED) REQUESTING A MEETING WITH HER ABOUT GATES. DATE NOT SET, WILL BE NEXT WEEK. WILLBE HOLDING TELECONFRENCE CALL WITH COUNTY ATTY JENNIFER AND PIPPERS GROVE ATTY NOT SCHEDULED YET. R/C 6/10/05 MHL 905427 SYKORACAROL 06/10/2005 06/10/2005 EMAIL FROM ALOMAR MEETING MONDAY 6/13/05 AT 3:30PM R/C 6/13/05 MHL 906682 SYKORACAROL 06/13/2005 06/16/2005 ON 6-15-05 CALLED ORCHARDS ASSOC. PRESIDENT TOM CARMON 465-9921. ORCHARDS ASSOC. HAD MEETING ON 6-14-05 WHERE THIS WAS DISCUSSED RESIDENTS NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PIPERS GROVES OFFER. FROM 1230 PM - 250 PM MET WITH COUNTY ATTY JENNIFER ATTEMPTED CALL TO PIPERS GROVES ATTY CHRIS VAN HISE ( 941) 366-6660 LEFT MESSAGE TO RETURN CALL ALSO WE WENT TO RECORDS DEPT. TO RESEARCH FOR PERMITS I LOCATED PERMIT # 950013884 FOR GUARD HOUSE. LOCATED PERMIT ON MICROFILM AND COPIED SEVERAL PAGES DID NOT INCLUDE GATE. THIS PERMIT WAS FOR GUARDHOUSE ON VANDERBILT RD. SIDE. ALSO CHECKED THROUGH PUD PLANS, JENNIFER CHECKED THESE OUT CALLED ROBERT GATELY 253-4162 WHO COMPLAINED TO COMMISSIONERS OFFICE THAT SIDEWALKS WERE BLOCKED BY GATES, NOT ALLOWING FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. I ASSURED HIM THIS WILL BE HANDLED WITH CASE. RC 6-21-05 DR 906832 SYKORACAROL 06/13/2005 06/13/2005 AT ABOVE LOCATION 10 M - OBSERVED GATES, GATE HOUSE NO FORM OF ACCESS, QUESTIONABLE ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES ENTRY - ALSO SIDEWALK BLOCKED. 40 M - HAD MEETING WITH ALOMAR AND WANDA I LOCATED PERMIT # 950013884 ORDERED FROM STORAGE FOR GATE HOUSE . ALSO NEED TO RESEARCH PUD. AFTER THE PERMIT IS OBTAINED, WILL MEET AGAIN. RC 6-17-05 DR 907432 SYKORACAROL 06/21/2005 06/29/2005 TOTAL TIME 3 HOURS. CALLED AND SPOKE TO ORCHARDS PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATION TOM CARMON (465-9921) ADVISED HE HAS MEETING WITH COMMISSIONER HALIS AT 1500. REQUESTED I FAX HIM INFORMATION WHICH I DID. ALSO CALLED PIPERS GROVE ATTORNEY CHRIS VANHISE. HE STATED THEY ARE WAITING TO HEAR FROM ORCHARDS REFERENCE THE LETTER SENT TO THEM ON. PROPOSED COSTS SPOKE TO JENNIFER COUNTY ATTY. REFERENCE CASE -ADVISED HER OF MEETING, SHE MAY ATTEND. DID NOT KNOW OF IT, AS I DID NOT EITHER. R/C 7/7/05 MHL Collier County Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 3 of 8 8A 909035 SYKORACAROL 07/12/2005 07/12/2005 RECEIVED FAX FROM MR VAN RISE PIPERS GROVE ATTY PERMIT 2004121465 FOR GATE S AIRPORT RD. ENTAANCE PERMIT #950012884 FOR GATEHOUSE VANDERBILT RD. MET WITH MEA#13 REF THIS. (1 HOUR) 911116 SYKORACAROL 07/13/2005 07/13/2005 R/C 7/13/05 MHL (2HRS) SPOKE TO ORCHARDS TOM CARMIN WHO SPEAK TO ME BEFORE MEETING WITH JENNIFER COUNTY ATTY. ALSO SPOKE TO JENNIFER REF THIS CASE CALLED PIPERS GROVE ATTY. LEFT MESSAGE. R/C 7/20/05 MHL 911117 SYKORACAROL 07/21/2005 07/21/2005 RECEIVED A CALL FROM JOHN MANSIRI FROM ORCHARDS ASSCIAION (594-558) HE IS NOT PLEASED WITH TOM CARMIN (ORCHARD ASSOC PRES) ADVISED MOST OF TM COMMUNITY WANTS TO WORK AN AGREEMENT OUT WITH PIPERS GROVE-JENNIFER COUNTY ATT. ALSO RECIVED A CALL FROM HIMPPOSSIBLE CONFRENCE CALL WILL BE MADE, R/C 7/29/05 MHL 912311 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 08/04/2005 08/04/2005 8/4/05 11:35-12:50 1-1/2 HRS SUPER PP#28 AND I TOOK PHOTOS AT ABOVE LOCATION. APPT. SCHEDULED FOR 8/9/05 WITH JENNIFER BELPEDIO, ASST. CO. ATTY TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS CASE R/C 913836 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 08/09/2005 08/09/2005 8/9/05 9:30-11:45 2 HRS. 15 MINS MEETING WITH JENNIFER BELPEDIO, ASST CO ATTY, SUPER PP#28 AND MYSELF TO DISCUSS CASE HX AND GENERAL ROLE OF CE. WILL RESEARCH PERMITS AND PUD CONTENTS R/C 8/12/05 JS Collier County CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM Page 4 of. 8 8A 914010 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 08/16/2005 08/16/2005 8/16/05 20 MINS RECEIVED MSG. ON 8/15/05 FROM MR. MANSIKA (594-5588 ORCHARDS BOARD OF DIRECTOR) WHO REQUESTED TO SET AN APPT TO SEE DOCS AND PROVIDE THE LATEST INFO TO HIM "ON THE ISSUE OF ACCESS THRU PIPER'S GROVE. ADVISED BY SUPERVISOR PP#28 THAT BASE DON RECENT DISC SHE HAD WITH JENNIFER BELPEDIO, ASST. CO. ATTY, TO LET MS. BELPEDIO HANDLE THESE CALLS. EMAILED MS. BELPEDIO RE: CALL BY JOHN MANSIKA. AFTER RETURNIN FROM THE FIELD TODAY, I RECV'D 2 MORE MSGS. FROM RM. MANSIKA AGAIN REQUESTING I CALL HIM RE: THE ACCESS THRU PIPER'S GROVE. ADVISED SUPERVISOR PP#28. SHE AND MS. BELPEDIO ADVISED ME TO RETURN HIS CALL. I CALLED MR. MANSIKA AND AVISED HIM I JUST INHERITED THE CASE. I AM STILL RESEARCHING AND HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF INFO TO REVIEW. HE SAID HE NEEDED THE INFO FOR HIS COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER. I AGAIN EXPLAINED I DID NOT HAVE ANY CONCRETE DECISION TO OFFER AT THIS TIME AND THAT I NEEDED TIME TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE ENTIRE CASE. HE SAID HE WAS A FRIEND OF JIM MUDD'S AND UNLESS I WANTED 300+ RESIDENTS CALLED THE CO. COMMISSIONERS, I WOULD LICATE A SP HE'S LOOKING FOR FOR HIS NEWSLETTER. I EXPLAINED I AM A PROFESSIONAL AND THAT I NEEDED TIME TO PERFORM A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE DOCS AND NEEDED TO READ THE PUD'S. HE WANTED TO KNOW WHY I WAS GIVEN THE CASE. HE STATED IT'S BEEN GOING ON SINCE MARCH AND WOULD NOW HAVE TO START ALL OVER. I SAID I COULD NOT PROVIDE ANSWERS FOR ADMIN. DECISIONS MEDE IN THE PAST. HE ASKED IT MITCHELL WAS MY SUPERVISOR. I ADVISED THAT PATTI PETRULLI IS MY SUPERVISOR AND HE DEMANDED TO BE "PUT THROUGH". I SAID, "I'LL SEE IF SHE'S AVAILABLE. SUPERVISOR PP#28 AVAILABLE, CALL TRANSFERRED. R/C 8/30/05 JS Collier County Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 5 of 8 916839 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 08/22/2005 08/22/2005 8/22/05 1 HR. 8 A MTG, WITH MA #13, PP#28, JENNIFER BELPEDIA (ASST CO. ATTY) AND MYSELF TO DISCUSS RESEARCH FINDINGS. MA#13, DIR, ADVISED SHE WILL CONTACT MR. CARMON, PRES. OF ORCHARDS, TO RELAY PERMIT ISSUES OF THAT COMMUNITY. PIPER'S GROVE'S ATTY OR ASSOC. PRES WILL ALSO RECEIVE CALL RE: PERMIT ISSUES. AFTER EXTENSIVE RESEARCH, FINAL DETERMINATION RE: ACCESS THRU PEIPER'S GROVE IS THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO ORDINANCE OR CODE VIOLATION; THEREFORE, IT IS A CIVIL ISSUE AND THE PEROGATIV OF THE ORCHARDS TO DETERMINE IF THEY WISH TO HIRE COUNSEL AND PROCEED LEGALLY IF SO DESIRED. MONITOR R/C 9/7/05 JS SCAN EMAIL AND ATTACH TO CASE 917584 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 09/09/2005 09/09/2005 9/9/05 5 MINS RECV'C MSG FROM SUPERVISOR PP#28 TO CALL REBECCA LEBEL 591-3007 OF PIPERS GROVE. I LEFT A MSG THAT I WAS RETNG CALL. AWAITING REPLY R/C 9/23/05 923669 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 09/28/2005 09/28/2005 9/28/05 5 MINS NO RETURN CALL FROM REBECCA LEBEL. CHECKED WITH JENNIFER BELPEDIO, AS TO ANY RECENT COMMUNICATIONS W/EITHER COMMUNITY CONCERNING PERMITS AND NONE TO HER KNOWLEDGE. WILL SCHEDULE APPT. W/ J BELPEDIO TO CONTACT ASSOC RE: PERMITS R/C 10/4/05 JS 923670 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 10/04/2005 10/04/2005 10/4/05 10 MINS. APPT SCHEDULED WITH J.BELPEDIO CANCELLED DUE TO SCHEDULING CONFLICTS. SHE INFORMED ME SHE SPOKE WITH PIPERS GROVE ATTY AND MENTIONED THE EXPIRED PERMIT 2005020619 R/C 10/5/05 JS Collier County Printed on; 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 6x �� 0 8A 923671 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 10/05/2005 10/05/2005 10/5/05 9:30-9:45 15 MINS SPOKE WITH SUPERVISOR PP#28 AND J. BELPEDIO. DUE TO SCHEDULING CONFLICTS, AGREEMENT I WILL PERSONALLY MAKE CALLS. 10:00-10:15 15 MINS.-I SPOKE WITH CHARLIE BAKER, PIPERS GROVE PRES 594-9212 AND KAREN CHANG, MGR. I PROVIDED MUCH DETAIL ABOUT EXPIRED PERMIT 2005020614 AND CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO RECITFY THE MATTER. MS. CHANG SIAD SHE WILL CONTACT THE CONTRACTOR. I EXPLAINED THE PERMIT WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE RESEARCH PROCESS AND I WAS CALLING AS A COURTESY. I REQUESTED SHE RESOLVE THE MATTER IN A TIMELY MANNER AND PROVIDE ME WITH REGULAR UPDATES. SHE WAS VERY CONCERNED THE CONTRACTOR WOULD ENCOUNTER PROBS AT PERMITTING. I EXPLAINED I D:D NOT WORK FOR THAT DEPT, BUT I WASN'T ANTICIPATING ANY. INFO RECV'D THAT TOM CARMON IS NO LONGER THE ASSC. PRES OF THE ORCHARDS. RESEARCH TO LOCATE SUCCESSOR R/C 10/19/05 JS 923673 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 10/11/2005 10/11/2005 10/11/05 4"05-4:10 5 MINS RECV'D UPDTE TAHT PETE BOYACK 593-8868 IS NOW THE ORCHARDS PRES. LEFT MSG FOR HIM TO PLS CALL ME. 4:30-4 :35 5 MINS. SPOKE WITH MR. BOYACK CELL: 821-6301 WHO CONFIRMED HE IS ORCHARDS PRES. I EXPLAINED I WAS CALLING AS A COURTESY TO LET HIM KNOW PWERMIT 1999061727 FOR GATES FAILED INSPECS. AND WAS NOT CO'ED. HE SAID HE WOULD CALL THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE BLDG DEPT/PERMTG ASAP. HE AGREED TO CALL ME WITH UPDTE. R/C 10/25 JS 10-11-05 5 MINS. EMAIL FROM MR. MARISKA RECV'D DISPUTING 10/11/05 CONVERSATION(ATTACHED) 924719 HEATHERGRIMSHAW 11/08/2005 11/08/2005 AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED, THE ACCESS MATTER WAS DETERMINED TO BE A CIVIL MATTER. SEPARATE CASES WERE BEGUN FOR GATE PERMIT ISSUES. C/C HG 58 LETTERS: REF TYPE LETTER NAME RAST DATE PRINT DATE SEND DATE STATUS RECV DATE VIOLATIONS: STATUS GROUP CODE VIOL. DATE DESCRIPTION/REMARKS COMPLIED ZON 2.2.20. 3/10/2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) COMPLIED ZON 2.2.20. 3/10/2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (POD) COMPLIED ZON 2.2.20. 8/4/2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Collier County Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 7 of 11 A (PUD) COMPLIED ZON 2.2.20. 8/9/2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) COMPLIED REQ 2.7.3. 6 8/16/2005 PUD MONITORING REQUIREMENTS COMPLIED ZON 2.2.20. 8/22/2005 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) IMAGES: IMAGE DATE IMAGE DESCRIPTION 8/4/2005 Piper's Grove entrance off Groves Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Piper's Grove entrance off Groves Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Groves Road leading to The Orchards entrance. HG 58 8/4/2005 Closeup: Groves Road leading to The Orchards entrance. HG 58 8/4/2005 Piper's Grove entrance off Groves Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Closeup of signs at Piper's Grove entrance off Groves Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Closeup: Groves Road leading to The Orchards entrance. HG 58 8/4/2005 Airport Rd: Piper's Grove entrance. 8/4/2005 Entrance to Piper's Grove off Airport Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Keypad at Piper's Grove entrance off Airport. HG 58 8/4/2005 Signs at entrance to Piper's Grove off Airport Road. HG 58 8/4/2005 Guardhouse & gates at Piper's Grove entrance off Airport. HG 58 8/4/2005 View of Livingston Road from Groves Road dead end. HG 58 8/4/2005 Groves Road dead end before Livingston. HG 58 8/4/2005 Closeup: Groves Road dead end. HG 58 8/4/2005 Groves Road dead end before Livingston. HG 58 COMENTS: ORIG DATETIME STATUS ORIG USER COMMENT: NOTES: Collier County Printed on: 07/03/2018 8:32:29AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 8 of 8 8A PIPER'S GROVE CONDOMINUMS 2480 Ord Groves Road• Naples, FL 34109 (239) 594-5005• Fax (239) 513-0206 March 23,2006 The Mayor Hon. Bill Barnett City of Naples 735 8'h Street South Naples,FL 34102 Dear Mayor Barnett: I am writing on behalf of Groves Residents Association, a condominium association comprising 388 units located just north of the City of Naples,near the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Although the Association recognizes that our community is located outside of the boundaries of the City of Naples,we feel your office should be apprised of a situation which,if our investigation into the matter is correct, could be viewed by the public as a misuse of official power by the City's Chief of Police,Steven Moore. Consequently,the Groves Residents Association would request that your office or the office of the City Manager make inquiry concerning the apparent unauthorized access and use of Old Groves Road, a gated and private road located within our community,by a vehicle which is owned by and/or primarily used by a woman residing at the home address of Chief Moore. By way of background,our community borders a commnnity known as The Orchards. Over the past few years,Old Groves Road(the primary internal roadway of our community)has been used as an unauthorized`but through"by some residents from The Orchards to gain more convenient access between their neighborhood and Airport-Pulling Road. As indicated above, Old Groves Road is gated at both its eastern and western end and is a private road owned and maintained by the Groves Residents Association. Apparently, some residents from The Orchards had obtained radio frequency transmitters allowing them to operate the gates on Old Groves Road without permission.. We also believe that some of these transmitters were improperly duplicated and provided to other residents within The Orchards,making the unauthorized"cut through"problem even larger and increasing the liability and maintenance costs which are solely borne by the Groves Residents Association. ,Recently,in an effort to address the unauthorized"cut through"traffic problem and also improve security within our community,the Groves Residents Association replaced and updated the access gates on Old Groves Road. The newly installed gates are now activated by a laser-scan bar code sticker or key card system. The radio transmitter system previously utilized to activate the gates is no longer functioning and the transmitters previously used by residents from The Orchards are no longer operable. However, security cameras posted at each gate location on Old Groves Road have captured images of a certain Lexus SUV,Florida license plate 1..J4IPZB,regularly passing through the new security gates despite the fact that this vehicle has neither the scan bar code sticker nor the key card necessary to operate the new gates. An investigation of publicly available motor vehicle EXHIBIT 3 1 8A records indicates that the subject Lexus SUV appears to be driven to and from, and regularly stored at, a home located in The Orchards which home, we believe,is owned by Chief Moore. Our gate installation contractor has certified that without the necessary scan bar code sticker or access key card,the new gate system on Old Groves Road cannot be activated unless an official law enforcement or emergency"E-VAC"radio transmitted override is utilized. Since the Groves Residents Association has not provided the owner of the aforementioned Lexus SUV with either a scan bar code sticker or key card to provide access through our gates,we believe that the possibility exits that our gate system is being regularly activated by use of an official law enforcement"E-VAC"radio actuator. As we believe that the unauthorized use of Old Groves Road could constitute a civil trespass,we recently filed a formal complaint with the Collier County Sheriff's Department concerning the Lexus SUV. It is worth noting,notwithstanding the filing of a complaint with the Sheriff's Department,the subject Lexus SUV continues to traverse through our gates and utilize Old Groves Road without authorization. Based on the foregoing, the Groves Residents Association would request that your office or the office of the City Manager look into this matter and provide us with clarification as to the propriety of the apparent use of a law enforcement"E-VAC"radio actuator to gain access through our gates. If our investigation and security camera documentation of this unauthorized use of OId Groves is confirmed,we would hope that no further action is required by our Association to stop this activity. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. On behalf of The Groves Residents Association,we look forward to your response. Yo y, v411, /OF #4110 WOil AP Larry ath ,y President, A,..ves Residents Association cc: Naples City Manager County Commissioner Halas 8A *** 4130173 OR; 4331 PG: 0829 *** UCORDID io OFFICIAL RICORDI of COLLIU CORM, FL 02/19/2400 at 02:5511 DWIGHT I. BROCA, CLICK uc FII 10.00 ThlsDocument Prepared By and Return to: WITHOpT OPINION OF TITLE Reta: DOC '10 10 ERT F. ROHR?I RDGIRS7BDBGB45VINEYAROIILEVARD 7 5 YIBITARDS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119 19 (239) 353-1973 NAPLES PL 34119 Parcel ID Number: 64550000059 Grantee ni TIN: Grantee#2 TIN: Quitclaim Deed This Quitclaim Deed, Made this 15th day of February PROCACCI BROS. SALES CORP. , 200$ AD., Between of the County of Collier THE GROVES RESID$NTS ASSOCIATION , State of Florida the laws of the State of Florida Naples, a corporation grantor,, and whose address is: 2480 Old Groves Road, existing under s, FL 33942 of the County of Collier Witnesseth that theGRANTOR,forandinconsiderationofthesumof state of Florida------------------------ ,grantee. and good and valuable consideration TEN DOLS ($10 to GRANTOR in hand($10) -----------------------e e i gnnted,bargained and quitclaimod to the said GRANTEE paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby w��' lyingandbeing in the County of and GRANTEE'S heirs,successorsY ar bed land,nit has roiled. and assigns forever,the following described land,sihtate Tract "A" The Old Groves Road accordin State of Florida orded in Plat Book 20, y to the lo wit: ecoda, c RecordsaoftColliera recrPage County, FloTOGETHER with all ten e�_ �'- TOETHER or ins editaments anywi a - .p - -ining. appurtenances thereto TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, h= ? _ ..., f•r ver; SUBJECT TO restrictio s; ir,:n.v,.y..-es,1/4...;,..on . any, -•=� � ': and taxes subse to 2007 -�'nte of record, if 4.3 To Have and to Hold the same together with all and singular the appertaining, and all the Mete, tight, title, interest, appurtenances thereuntothe use, benefit and lien, equity and claim whatsoever of belonging or in anywise profit of the said grantee forever. grantor, either in law In Wi Whereof,the or equity, for grantor has hereuruo set its hand and seal the day and year first above wrinm sig seal and delivered in ou presence:/ PRO •CCI EROS, S• ES CORP. Printed Name; ��','!��-- ' / - OF- r ivitne- . :l:s��. By. MI L PROCA CI, PRESIDENT (seal) ARP. 0 P.O.Address:75 Vineyards Blvd,Naples FL 34719 111111ftaill,11 /..illigan-- '...._ ..01 N. ,,et STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier (Corporate Seal) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day of February MICHAEL PROCACCI, PRESIDENT of PROCACCI BROS. SALES CORP. '2008 by the corporation on behalf of he is personally known to me or he has produced his Florida driver'e . as identification. Printed N EXHIBIT r Notary Public I PROCORp�y�pt;•- ....••.......•-• My Commission Expires: ) 4ct taaQ 4 4ae"aelrO Di!Pta S„ra,a,ta.,2001(163),61„s!ram p.Qco., i -.—.._.---- a8 ` 8A OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: October 21, 2019 TO: The Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the Board of Zoning Appeals Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chair; CRAB Co-Chair, District 5 Commissioner Burt Saunders, Vice-Chair, District 3 Commissioner Donna Fiala, CRAB Co-Chair, District 1 Commissioner Andy Solis, District 2 Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 FROM: Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney SUBJECT: Hearing on the Appeal ADA-PL20190001155 of the Official Interpretation INTP- PL20190000062 of whether Old Groves Road is required to be open to the residents of the Orchards Subdivision I. General — In keeping with prior appeals of this nature before the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA"), the appeal hearing process is quasi-judicial in nature and is therefore subject to the provisions of Resolution Number 95-376, requiring proper disclosure of any Commissioners ex-parte contacts, communications, site visits, investigations, or receipt of expert opinions. Likewise, the procedural requirements of Resolution Number 98-167 also apply. Copies of both resolutions are attached for your convenience. 2. The Land Development Code (Sec. 1.06.01.D.6) provides the following with respect to Appeals of Official Interpretations: The Board of Zoning Appeals or the Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals, whichever is applicable, shall hold an advertised public hearing on the appeal and shall consider the interpretation of the County Manager or designee or building official, whichever is applicable, and public testimony in light of the growth management plan, the future land use map, the LDC or the official zoning atlas, or building code related matters, whichever is applicable. The Board of Zoning Appeals or the Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals, whichever is applicable, shall adopt the County Manager or designee's or building official's interpretation, whichever is applicable, with or without modifications or conditions, or reject their interpretation. The Board of Zoning Appeals or the Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals, whichever is applicable, shall not be authorized to modify or reject the County Manager or designee's or building official's interpretation unless such board finds that the determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence or that the official interpretation is contrary to the Growth Page 1 of 3 Tletyl W n 8A Management Plan, the future land use map, the LDC or the official zoning atlas, or building code, whichever is applicable. Accordingly, the ultimate issues to be determined in the appeal are: a. Whether there is competent, substantial evidence to support the Official Interpretation by staff; and b. Whether the Official Interpretation by staff is contrary to the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan ("GMP") or that it does not comply with the requirements of the Land Development Code ("LDC") or other County ordinances. 3. The appeal hearing before the BZA is informal. 4. Relevant evidence will be considered at the hearing. The Chairman of the BZA, with the assistance of the County Attorney, will determine what is relevant evidence. 5. The County Attorney recommends the following procedures: a. The court reporter administers the oath to those wishing to speak. If a speaker arrives at the hearing after the oath is given, the speaker must be sworn in before they can speak. b. The members of the BZA then make their individual ex-parte disclosures. All communications must be disclosed including letters, e-mails, phone calls, and meetings. Any personal investigation, such as a site visit, must also be disclosed. The subject matter of the communication and the identity of the person, groups or entity with whom the communication took place are all part of the disclosure. This applies to all communications that took place even before the appeal was filed. These disclosures must be made at the beginning of the hearing. The BZA must give any person who wishes to question its members concerning the ex-parte disclosure the opportunity to ask questions of it. This right may be waived by a failure to ask questions of the Board. c. The presentation of the appeal should be as follows: i. The appealing party presents its case. The time limit is one hour. a) The Zoning Director may question the appealing party. The time limit is 10 minutes. b) The impacted property owner may question the appealing party. The time limit is 10 minutes. ii. The impacted property owner presents its case. The time limit is one hour. a) The appealing party may ask questions. The time limit is 10 minutes. Page 2 of 3 8A b) The Zoning Director may ask questions. The time limit is 10 minutes. iii. Staff presents its case. The time limit is 30 minutes. a) The appealing party may ask questions. The time limit is 10 minutes. b) The impacted property owner may ask questions. The time limit is 10 minutes. iv. The members of the BZA may ask questions at any time during the proceedings. It is suggested that there be no time limit to the BZA's questions, subject, however, to the discretion of the Chair. v. Interested members of the public may then speak. Time limits per speaker is 3 minutes. The BZA should only give consideration to "public testimony" that is relevant to the issues being discussed. vi. After Public Comment, in order, the Zoning Director, the impacted property owner, and the appealing party, will each have 15 minutes to sum up. This summation could include any rebuttal. vii. Time limits may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. viii. Upon conclusion of the public speakers' presentations, the BZA should close the public hearing and commence discussion. ix. Upon conclusion of the discussion, the BZA will make its motion, second and then vote. A simple majority is required to approve the motion. The BZA shall either adopt the official interpretation, with or without modifications or conditions, or reject the interpretation. Attachments: Resolution Number 95-376 Resolution Number 98-167 Page 3 of 3 8A JUN2Qt99i RESOLUTION NO. 95_� �7E' A RESOLUTION RELATING TONGACCESS TO DEFINITIONOF LOCAL LOCAL U LICIOFF PROVIDING FOR ACCESS LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICIAL; TO PUBLIC OFFICIALS; AUTHORIZING INVESTIGA- TIONS AND RECEIPT OF INFORMATION; REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE O.0,51M-1154.TONS; AND WHEREAS, government in Florida is conducted in the sun- shine pursuant to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the public should be able to voice its opinions • to local elected public officials; and resumed to WHEREAS, elected and public officials are p perform their duties in a lawful and proper manner; and WHEREAS, quasi-judicial decision-making must be based on • competent, substantial evidence of record; and WHEREAS, local elected public officials have been obstructed or impeded from the fair and effective discharge of o sive their sworn duties and responsibilities da ede oisionnrenderedebY pretations of JeLLings v---Oade o nty, the Third District Court of Appeal,' and WHEREAS, Section 5, Article I of the Florida Constitution gives the people the right peaceably to assemble, to instruct their representatives, and to petition for redress of griev- ances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY Collier Pursuant to Subsection 286.0115, Florida Statutes, County has the authority to enact this Resolution which removes the presumption of prejudice from ex parte communications with local officials by establishing the process set forth herein to disclose such communications. SECTION TWO: DEFINITION official" As used in this Section, the term "local public means any elected or appointed public official holding a county -1- A001C �i[ 191 8A JUN 2 0 1995 office who recommends or takes quasi-judicial action as a member of such board or commission. SECTION THREE: ACCESS PERMITTED 1. Any person not otherwise prohibited by statute, charter provision, or ordinance may discuss with any local public official the merits of any matter on which action may be taken by the board or commission on which the local public official is a member. Adherence to the following procedures • shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex-parte communications with local public officials. (a) The substance of any ex-parte communication with a local public official which relates to quasi-judicial action pending before the official is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of • the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and made a part of the record before final action on the matter. (b) A local public official may read a written communi- cation from any person. However a written communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before the local public official shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action and such written communication shall be made a part of the record of the board or commission before final action on the matter. (c) Local public officials may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi- judicial action pending before them. Such activities shall not • be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit, or expert opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. (d) Disclosure made pursuant to paragraphs (a) , (4) and (c) must be made before or during the public meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opin- -2- { COOK 1itU°,': l]- i 8A JUN 2 Q 1.995 ions contrary to those expressed in the ex-pare communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. SECTION FOUR: REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 95-354 Resolution No. 95-354 is hereby repealed in its entirety. This Resolution adopted this ?.pth day of June, 1995, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, ClerY. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • „ - L , By BETTYE 8 . t .TTHEWS, C airman • Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: • Kenneth B. Cuyly/ County Attorne mm../iwll)ns - 3 - eUox t1(l0 P�.�193 un .L 8A RESOLUTION 98- 167 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Commissioners (Board), as the duly elected governing body for Collier County,holds regularly scheduled public beatings to discuss, review and act upon items of concern to and affecting the residents of Collier County,and - WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), serving as the local planning agency and the land development regulation commission as required by F.S. §§ 163.3174 and 1633194, holds regularly scheduled public hearings to discuss, review, act upon and make recommendations to the Board relative to items of concern to and affecting the residents of Collier County;and WHEREAS,included in these items may be advertised public hearings of a quasi- judicial or legislative nature;and WHEREAS, the public may wish to comment on these items scheduled for considera ion before the Board or the CCPC;and REAS, in order to maintain, equity, decorum and order at these regularly schedul d public hearings, it is necessary to establish standard procedures for presentations and public comment before the Board and the CCPC;and WHEREAS,the Board has prepared these rules in an attempt to encourage public a participation during advertised public hearings, including quasi-judicial hearings, in a manner consistent with the requirements of law:; • NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that • 1 The Board of County Commissioners declares that the procedures set forth, • attached hereto, and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit A, applicable to the • • • bPI °�� 8A • Board and the Collier County Planning Commission as stated in said Exhibit,are fair and reasonable,and are hereby adopted. • t BE I'1' FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to procedures for Board and CCPC presentations and public comment be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and majority vote favoring same. Done this /7 day of �S ,1998. Al i'EST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ;. .,,.• •••••Dwight E.Brock,Clerk COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA . = c. .` s !�_ _' _. ter•. ;r}i j:i J; , , ,' = i Barbara B.Berry,Chairman `,r• ��. .' •. • .. d. _�~t=,i ` Xttest as to Chairman's'x �;wr-,r'_fi4si nature only. ' '�'•"'!APPrJived as to form and legal ;' suffipiency; Azi .( 4 David C.Weigel,Cou Attorney • i • i 2 - 8A '14 Exhibit "A" Procedures for Presentations before the Collier Cot Commissioners and as Applicable to the Collier Coif __ „ Commission A. Public Comment on General Tonics:Members of the public may register to speak on general topics under the Public Comment portion of the Board of County Commissioner's (Board) agenda. The number of speakers permitted to register under public comment on any given agenda shall be limited to a maximum of five,unless the Chairman recognizes additional speakers. • I. Stedker Registration: Individuals wishing to speak to the Board under public comment at any regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of County Commissioners shall register to speak in writing on the form provided by the County prior to the public comment portion of the agenda being called by the Chairman. II. Time Limits: a) Public Comment: 1. Maximum 5 minutes per speaker. B. Public Petitions: Public Petitions are limited to a single speaker. In general, the . Board will not take action on public petition items on the day the petition is • presented, but may direct staff to take action, or bring back the item to the Board at a future date for consideration.The County Administrator may defer scheduling a public petition for a reasonable period of time in order to allow sufficient time for staff to review the content and thus prepare for questions from the Board. 1. Registration: Individuals wishing to make a public petition to the Board of County Commissioners shall present such a request in writing to.the County Administrator a minimum of 13 days prior to the Board meeting date on which the public petition is requested to be heard.The written request shall include the - - name(s) and address(es) of all petitioners, including a primary contact name, _ address and telephone number,and shall state the nature of the petition,including any exhibits and/or back up material which may be pertinent to the petition. II. Time Limits:Maximum 10 minutes per speaker. • C. Advertised Public Hearings: For procedural purposes, advertised public hearings fall into two categories: those which are quasi-judicial,in nature; and other types 1111 of advertised public hearings,including those which are legislative in nature. I. Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings: 8A a) Purpose and Intent: The Board has prepared these rules in an attempt to encourage public participation during quasi-judicial hearings in a manner consistent with the requirements of law. As part of that effort and within the confines of the law, the Board intends its hearings to be informal while recognizing the need for certain structure to maintain orderly hearings. Notwithstanding the procedures established by resolution,the Board may modify these procedures to effectuate the effective presentation of evidence. b) Applicability of these Procedures: (1) Quasi-Judicial Proceedings. These procedures apply to all quasi-judicial proceedings heard by the Board and the CCPC regardless of the capacity in which.the Board is sitting. Quasi-Judicial actions concern the implementation of policy, which has already been set, and affording the Board, and in some instances the CCPC, limited discretion in deciding whether to approve or deny a land use permit. These include land use actions which have an impact on a Iimited number of persons or property owners on identifiable parties and interests, where the decision is contingent on a fact or facts arrived at from distinct alternatives presented at a hearing. Examples of quasi-judicial proceedings include but are not limited to: site specific rezonings (provided they involve policy implementation); development of regional impact hearings; • • conditional use permits; variances; boat dock extension petitions; and administrative appeals. (2) Legislative Proceedings.Utilization of these procedures by the Board or the CCPC when sitting in a legislative capacity does not change the character of the legislative proceeding nor does it confer any additional rights or remedies upon any person or party. C) Pre-Hearing Submittals: (1) Application. An applicant (as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code)shall make application as provided in the procedures established-for the individual decision being requested. (2) Staff/Agency Recommendation. To the extent that the applicable procedure requires a staff review and written recommendation to be presented to the Board, such written recommendation shall be completed and available for public inspection no later than ten calendar days prior to the hearing before the Board. (3) Written Presentation.No later than one week prior to the scheduled public hearing before the Board, any applicant, proponent, or opponent may submit any written arguments, evidence, explanations, studies, reports, petitions or other documentation to staff for intended consideration by the Board in support of or in'opposition to the application. In order to be ,41 included in a Board or CCPC Agenda packet, any written arguments, evidence, explanations, studies, reports,petitions or other documentation must be submitted to the appropriate staff no later than three weeks prior to the scheduled hearing before the respective body. All written 8A SAI *1'4 submissions, not including pictorial displays (maps, graphs and the like) must be on 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper. No written materials will be accepted by the Board at its hearing unless, at the Board's discretion, acceptance is necessary to decide the issue. Written comments submitted shall be considered and entered into the record of the meeting in accordance with subsection C.I.d)(4)below. d) Public Hearings before the Board or the CCPC: (1) General. It is the expectation that the hearing will be informal. All members of the public who address the Board or the CCPC shall utilize the speaker's podium to allow their comments to be recorded. Each speaker shall state his or her name and address for the record. Additionally, speakers shall indicate whether they are speaking on behalf of themselves or others. (a) Time Limitation Guidelines. It is expected that presentations will be organized and efficiently presented. As a guideline to presentations, in addition to the written comments submitted as part of the preliminary record, it is expected that persons of the following status will prepare their discussions and comments to be completed within the prescribed time limits: 1. Staff shall be responsible for presenting the case on I. behalf of Collier County and shall limit their presentations to twenty(20)minutes. 2. The applicant shall present his or her entire case in twenty (20)minutes. 3. Expert witnesses shall be limited to ten (10) minutes each. 4. Persons who have been authorized to represent an organi7tion with five(5) or more members or a group of five(5) or more persons should limittheir presentation to ten (10) minutes. It is expected that others in the organization or group waive their time. • 5. All other persons may speak for a maximum of five (5) minutes each. 6. No speaker may give his or her time to any other speaker. At the discretion of the Chairman, the time allowed,for any speaker may be extended. (b) Registration of Speakers.Persons who desire to speak on an item � shall,prior to the item being called to be heard by the Chairman, register with the County Administrator on the forms provided. Five (5) or more persons deemed by the Board to be associated together or otherwise represent a common point of view, as 8A 8A104 proponents or opponents on any item may be requested to select a (fra spokesperson. (2) Order and Subject of Appearance: To the extent possible, the following shall be the order of the proceeding: • (a) Preliminary Statement. The Chairman shall read a preliminary statement once at the beginning of the quasi-judicial hearing portion of the agenda outlining the procedure, which shall be followed. • (b) Sworn Testimony. The applicant, staff, and all witnesses requesting to speak shall be collectively sworn. I (c) Agreement with Staff's Recommendation. If the applicant or agent of the applicant agrees with staff's recommendation and wishes to waive his or her right to present additional evidence, and if no commissioner or anyone from the audience wishes to speak for or against the quasi-judicial agenda item,the Board may vote on the item based upon staff's presentation and the materials in the agenda back-up. (d) Initial Presentation by Staff. County staff shall make the initial presentation to the Board regarding any item under consideration. I• After completion of the staff presentation, the Board may make inquiries of staff at this time. An applicant or appellant may ask questions of, or seek clarification from, staff by request through the Chairman at the time that party makes its initial presentation . to the Board. (e) Applicant's Presentation. After staff presentation,the applicant(s) shall be allowed to make a presentation to the Board based on the time limitation guidelines outlined in the preceding subsection(d) (1) (a), above. During and after the applicants' presentation,the Board shall have an opportunity to comment or ask questions of • or seek clarification from the applicant. The Board may also allow staff to comment, ask questions or seek clarification from the applicant(s)at this time. • • - (f) Speakers. After Board and staff inquiry of the applicant, speakers shall be allowed to speak based on the time limitation guidelines outlined in the preceding subsection(d)(1) (a),above.During and after a speaker's presentation,the Board.shall have an opportunity to comment or ask questions of or seek clarification from such speaker. The Board may also allow staff to comment, "ask questions of or seek clarification from speakers. Staff Response and Summary. The staff shall be allowed an (g) opportunity for response to the presentations by the applicant, proponents and opponents and a summary with any changes in position after consideration of relevant public comment.Proponents 4 8A 8 A 1 00 and opponents who believe that the staff response includes errors of fact or law may ask for and may be allowed an opportunity to point out such errors of fact or law. Applicant's Rebuttal Presentation. 1. Applicant's rebuttal shall be allowed only on items where there is an applicant other than the Board or Board staff. After staff response, the applicant shall be allowed an opportunity for rebuttal. Rebuttal shall be limited to five (5) minutes unless otherwise set by the Board. Rebuttal shall only address previous comments. • 2. Staff, who believe that the rebuttal presentation includes an error of fact or law, may ask for and may be allowed an opportunity to point out such error of fact or law. (i) Board and Staff Inauiry. After all presentations have been made as outlined above, the Board shall have a final opportunity to comment or ask questions. The Board may allow staff to respond to comments previously made at this time. (j) Limit on Presentations. No person who his made a presentation for or against an item at a given meeting shall be allowed to make additional comments,unless requested to do so by the Board. (k) Closing of Public Comment. In those matters on which public comment is heard by the Board, the Chairman shall close the public comment portion of the meeting (on that item) upon the conclusion of the last speaker's comments or, in the Board's discretion, if no new relevant information is being presented. No additional public comments shall be allowed, except in specific response to questions by members of the Board. • (3) Miscellaneous Items: • (a) Continuing Record /Speakers Qualifications. The Clerk to the Board("Clerk') shall maintain a file with the most recent copies of resumes previously filed with the Clerk by County staff presenters. All other persons testifying on issues requiring educational, occupational and other experience who wish to be qualified as experts shall submit their,qualifications in written form for the Board's approval to speak as expert witnesses. • • (b) Organizational or Grout" Sneakers. Prior to presenting his/her case, any person AcpLesenting an organization or other persons shall indicate, in. writing, the organization or group he/she represents and how he/she received authorization to speak on (110 behalf of such organization or group of persons. The Board may make further inquiry into the represented authority of such person if necessary. 5 8A S (c) Restrictions on Tesliiiiony or Presentation of Evidence. Notwithstanding any provisions herein, any Board member may interrupt any presentation that contains matters which need not be considered in deciding the matter then before the Board for consideration. At any Board proceeding, the Chairman, unless overruled by majority of the Board members present,may restrict or terminate presentations which in the chairman's judgment are frivolous,unduly repetitive or out of order. • (d) Public Officials. Notwithstanding other provisions hereof, the Board may allow any elected or appointed public official, or representative thereof, to appear and make presentations at any time with regard to matters under.consideration. (e) Continued Public Hearings.In any matter where it is known that a scheduled public hearing will be continued to a future date certain, the staff report may be abbreviated and public comment may be limited to those persons who state that they believe they can not be available to speak on the date to which the public hearing is being continued. Such persons may make their comments at the current meeting; provided, however, that upon • making their comments, such persons shall waive the right to o repeat or make substantially the same presentation at any subsequent meeting on the same subject. This waiver shall not preclude such persons from making different presentations based on new information or from offering response to other persons' presentation,if otherwise allowable,at any subsequent meeting. (4) The Record (a) Automatically Included in the Record: The following documents shall automatically be included in the record of the hearing before the Board: (1) - The record from any preliminary hearing, the agenda packet, the staff report, and the transeiipt of the hearing before the Board; (2) Written comments and documents previously entered into the record at a prior Board meeting on the particular matter. • (b) Items Which Shall Be Placed in the Record: Any additional • documents, exhibits, diagrams,petitions,letters or other materials presented in support of, or in opposition to, an item to be ft) considered by the Board shall be entered into the record, as long as it was received by the Board's Clerk or the applicable Collier County department seven(7)days prior to the date of the hearing. 6 8A • 8A11121,1t • (c) Additional Evidence. Except pursuant to subsection C)(3)above, Written Presentation, any additional written or documentary �• evidence filed within seven (7) days of the date of the hearing shall not become part of the record. (d) Custodian.The Clerk shall be the official custodian of the record. (e) Exhibits. Unless an oversized exhibit is absolutely essential, documentary paper or photographic exhibits should not exceed 24 inches by 36 inches and, if mounted on a backboard, shall be removable therefrom. All documentary evidence should be capable of being folded and filed. II. Other Public Hearings: The following rules apply to advertised public hearings other than those which are quasi-judicial in nature, including those advertised public hearings which are legislative in nature. a) Pre-Hearing Submittals: (1) Application. An applicant (as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code)shall make application as provided in the procedures established for the individual decision being requested. (2) Staff/Agency Recommendation. To the extent that the applicable (ID procedure requires a staff review and written recommendation to be presented to the Board, that written recommendation shall be completed and available for public inspection no later than ten calendar days prior to the hearing before the Board. (3) Written Presentation.No later than one week prior to the scheduled public hearing before the Board, any applicant, proponent, or opponent may submit,in support of or in opposition to the issue which is the subject of the advertised public hearing, any written arguments, evidence, explanations, studies,reports,petitions or other documentation to staff for intended consideration by the Board.• All written submissions, not including pictorial displays (maps,graphs and the like)must be on 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper. - J b) Public Hearing: • • (1) . General. All members of the public who address the Board shall utilize the speaker's podium to allow their comments.to be recorded,.and Shall identify themselves by name and local addresses, if applicable. Further, any speaker speaking on behalf of an organization or group of individuals (exceeding five) shall indicate such and shall cite the source of such authority whether by request,petition,vote,or otherwise. (a) Time Limitation Guidelines.•It is expected that presentations will (lb (a) organized and efficiently presented. As a guideline to presentations, in addition to the written comments submitted as part of the preliminary record, it is expected that persons in the 7 8A 8A1 '1 following status will prepare their discussions and comments to IIIbe completed within the prescribed time limits: 1. Staff shall be responsible for summarizing the item for the Board and shall limit such presentation to a maximum • of twenty(20)minutes. 2. For advertised public hearing items (other than those which are quasi-judicial in nature), where there is an applicant other than the Board of County Commissioners or staff, following the staff summary of the item the applicant will have an opportunity to make a maximum (10)minute presentation. 3. Persons who have been authorized to represent an organization with five(5) or more members or a group of five(5) or more persons should limit their presentation to ten (10) minutes. It is expected that others in the organization or group waive their time. 4. All other persons may speak for a maximum of five (5) minutes each. 5. No speaker may give his or her time to any other speaker. At the discretion of the Chairman, the time allowed for ill any speaker may be extended (b) Sneaker Reeistration. Persons, other than staff and the applicant • . (where applicable), wishing to speak on an advertised public hearing item shall,prior to the item being heard,register with the County Administrator on the forms provided. Five (5) or more persons deemed by the Board to be associated together or otherwise represent a common point of view, as proponents or opponents on any item may be requested to select a spokesperson. (2) Miscellaneous Items: •: " .H•'-• f r (a) Oreanizational Or Groun' Sneakers: Prior to making his/her • ' ' comments, any person representing..an organization or other ; — • persons shall indicate who he/she represents and how he/she . received authorization to speak on behalf of such organization or • • group of persons. The Board may make further inquiry into the represented authority of such person if necessary. (b) Restrictions an Comments Deemed Not Germane to the Item. Notwithstanding any provisions herein, any Board member may interrupt and/or stop any presentation that discusses matters that go need not be considered in deciding the matter then before the Board for consideration. At any Board proceeding,the Chairman, unless overruled by majority of the Board members present,may 8 8A UMj roik., restrict or terminate presentations which in the chairman's 0 judgment are frivolous,unduly repetitive or out of order. (c) Public Officials. Notwithstanding other provisions hereof, the Board may allow any elected or appointed public official or representative thereof, to appear and make presentations at any time with regard to matters under consideration. (d) Continued Public Hearings.In any matter where it is known that a scheduled public hearing will be continued to a future date certain, the staff report may be abbreviated and public comment may be limited to those persons who state that they believe they cannot be available to speak on the date to which the public hearing is being continued. Such persons may make their ' comments at the current meeting; provided, however, that upon making their comments, such persons shall waive the right to repeat or make substantially the same presentation at any subsequent meeting on the same subject. D. Other Agenda Items Before the Board: In addition to public hearing, public comment and public petition items, with the approval of the Board, members of the public may speak on other Board agenda items. L Registration: Persons wishing to speak on agenda items other than advertised public hearing items,public comment on general topics and public petition items, . shall register to speak on the form provided by the County prior to the item being called by the Chairman to be heard. II Time Limits: Where the Board has requested or otherwise authorized public input on agenda items other than public hearing, public comment on general topic, or public petitions items, speakers will be limited to a maximum of 5 minutes. • K. . • • .. 9 .