Loading...
Agenda 09/24/2019 Item #16C 8 (Interlocal Agreement w/Everglades City)Proposed Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting September 24, 2019 Withdraw Item 16C8: Recommendation to terminate the Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement between Collier County, the Collier County Water- Sewer District, and the City of Everglades City, consistent with the City's request. (Staff’s request) Move Item 16H1 to Item 10C: Presentation of Hearing Examiner’s Annual Activities Report to the Board of County Commissioners. (Commissioner Solis’ request) Move Item 16C2 to Item 11E: Recommendation to approve the annual rate resolution to establish the fees, rates, and charges for the use of Collier County Solid Waste Facilities, including landfill tipping fees, recycling drop-off center fees, and residential multi-family and commercial waste collection fees for Fiscal Year 2020 (FY20). This resolution adopts the rates that fund the FY20 budget for solid waste collection and disposal and increases the rate to 2.9 percent on landfill tipping fee and 2.0 percent for residential solid waste collection assessments. (Commissioner Taylor’s request) Move Item 16K3 to Item 12B: Request by the Collier County Industrial Development Authority for approval of a Resolution authorizing the Authority to issue revenue bonds to be used to finance educational facilities for the Community School of Naples, Inc. (Commissioner Solis’ request) Time Certain Items: Item 10A to be heard at 9:50 a.m. Companion Items 9A and 9B to be heard no sooner than 10:00 a.m. 9/24/2019 9:21 AM 09/24/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to terminate the Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement between Collier County, the Collier County Water- Sewer District, and the City of Everglades City, consistent with the City’s request. OBJECTIVE: To obtain the Board of County Commissioner’s (Board’s) approval for the termination of the County’s assistance to the City of Everglades City (“City”) relating to its water and wastewater utility system. CONSIDERATIONS: On February 21, 2017, FDEP met with staff to discuss the condition of the Everglades water and wastewater utility system (“System”) and requested that Collier County and the Collier County Water-Sewer District (collectively the “County”) assist in solving significant problems and to help bring the utility back into compliance. Numerous discussions between County staff, the City of Everglades City, and FDEP were held thereafter, and on March 3, 2017, Collier County received a letter from FDEP formally requesting assistance and cooperation from Collier County Public Utilities. On December 12, 2017, the Board approved the County entering into a Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement, which is a two-part Agreement with the City under Agenda Item 11.E (the “Agreement”), a copy of which is Attachment No. 1. By letter dated September 4, 2018, the City made a request for technical assistance for: 1) contract administration; 2) capital improvement planning; and 3) grant writing assistance. As a result of this request, the County hired Hole Montes to perform an evaluation of the System and prepare a Capital Improvement Plan, and Angie Brewer to assist in grant eligibility and acquisition for the City. As identified in the September 11, 2018 Agenda Item 16.C.11, $300,000 of General Fund (001) was appropriated in the FY2019 budget to support this effort. To date, the County received invoices from Hole Montes totaling $29,392.91 and an invoice from Angie Brewer in the amount of $18,210.25 for work performed on behalf of the City. Pursuant to the Agreement, the County forwarded an invoice to the City for a total of $47,603.16 for those services. The City has notified the County that, effective July 31, 2019, its request for technical assistance relating to contract administration and capital improvement planning be withdrawn. This letter is included in the package as Exhibit 2. The City also disputes all billing included for work performed by Hole Montes per their initial request for technical assistance for capital improvement planning. Section 6 of the Agreement provides for either party to terminate the Agreement without cause, effective thirty (30) days after notice to the other party, and that any obligations that began during the Agreement shall survive. The County’s Purchase Order to Angie Brewer has $6,789.75 remaining. With the exception of that Purchase Order to Angie Brewer, the County requests that the Board approve termination of the Agreement and our Technical Assistance Progress and Closure Report attached as Attachment 3. FISCAL IMPACT: An invoice was sent to the City to reimburse the County for expenditures made to date on the City’s behalf relating to the initial technical assistance request in the amount of $47,603.16. Those funds have come from the General Fund (001) have not been reimbursed by the City. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK 16.C.8 Packet Pg. 1391 09/24/2019 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approves the termination of the Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement between the County, the Collier County Water-Sewer District, and the City of Everglades City, and authorizes and directs the County Manager and/or his designee to sign any and all documents or letters evidencing and notifying of said termination. Prepared by: G. George Yilmaz, Public Utilities Department Head Joseph Bellone, Director, Public Utilities Financial Operations Support Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (PDF) 2. Attachment 2 City Withdraws From Tech Assistance (PDF) 3. Attachment 3 Progress and Closure Report July 2019 (PDF) 4. US Water Contract (PDF) 5. US Water Contract Exhibits (PDF) 6. Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (PDF) 7. CIP DRAFT Cover Ltr & Summary (PDF) 8. [Linked] CIP Appendix 1 Wastewater System (PDF) 9. [Linked] CIP Appendix 2 Potable Water System (PDF) 10. Governor Ron DeSantis Announcement of More Than $750,000 in Grants (PDF) 11. Angie Brewer Scope of Services - Everglades City (PDF) 12. Angie Brewer PO 4500190035 (PDF) 13. Angie Brewer Invoice 1 - 05-14-19 (PDF) 16.C.8 Packet Pg. 1392 09/24/2019 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.C.8 Doc ID: 10090 Item Summary: Recommendation to terminate the Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement between Collier County, the Collier County Water- Sewer District, and the City of Everglades City, consistent with the City's request. Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Prepared by: Title: – Public Utilities Department Name: Drew Cody 09/09/2019 12:01 PM Submitted by: Title: Department Head - Public Utilities – Public Utilities Department Name: George Yilmaz 09/09/2019 12:01 PM Approved By: Review: Public Utilities Operations Support Joseph Bellone Additional Reviewer Completed 09/09/2019 12:24 PM Public Utilities Department Drew Cody Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 09/09/2019 2:15 PM Public Utilities Department George Yilmaz Level 2 Division Administrator Review Completed 09/09/2019 5:44 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 09/10/2019 2:02 PM Budget and Management Office Ed Finn Additional Reviewer Completed 09/10/2019 6:07 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 09/12/2019 10:31 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 09/14/2019 12:55 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 09/24/2019 9:00 AM 16.C.8 Packet Pg. 1393 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE I NT E R L O C A L AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY, THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, AND COLLIER COUNTY This Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into these 5th and 12th days of December, 2017, by and between The City of Everglades City, a Florida Municipality ("City"), the Collier County Water-Sewer District, an independent special district formed under the laws of the State of Florida ("District"); and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County"). RECITALS WHEREAS, City currently owns a water and wastewater utility system for the residents of City (the "System"). The System consists solely of those facilities, assets, inventories, and interests including, without limitation, property commonly known as the Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, including a wastewater treatment plant located at 401 S. Copeland Avenue in Everglades City, Florida ("Wastewater Facility") and a potable water/drinking water facility located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive in Copeland, Florida ("Potable Water Facility"), as well as appurtenant pipes and equipment, utility easements of record and real and personal property used for the System; and WHEREAS, City currently contracts with Veolia Water North America — South, LLC, VWNA")to operate the System; WHEREAS, City is a party to a consent order, OGC File No. 13-0853-11-DW, ("Consent Order") issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("FDEP") concerning the operation of the System and its non-compliance with various environmental rules and other requirements of FDEP; WHEREAS, City is currently the subject of an enforcement action brought by FDEP in the Circuit Court in and for Collier County, Case No. 15-CA-2134, to enforce the terms of the Consent Order and applicable rules and requirements of FDEP (the "Enforcement Action"); WHEREAS,on September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall in City causing damage to City and to the System; WHEREAS, City does not have the financial ability to cure the corrective actions sought to be cured in the Enforcement Action, while at the same time maintaining the System, and engaging in a recovery effort post-Hurricane Irma; Page 1 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1394 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical WHEREAS, City has asked County if both the District and the County would be willing to provide technical assistance, and assistance in securing funding for operating the System and performing improvements thereto, and if the District and the County would standby as a potential backup operator of the System, if the operations agreement with VWNA is prematurely terminated for any reason; WHEREAS, District and County would be willing to provide technical assistance, funding assistance, and backup operation assistance on the terms and conditions set forth below; WHEREAS, section 5(8) of chapter 2003-353, Laws of Florida, expressly provides District with the power "[t]o contract with other private or public entities . . . to operate the water or sewer system of such entity or person"; WHEREAS, the parties understand that, in entering this Agreement, District and County do not agree to and are not obligated to undertake or to fund either the continued operation of the System or any capital improvements to the System necessary to ensure compliance with applicable rules, permits, orders, or other requirements of FDEP, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any other governmental agency; WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties that the primary purpose of this Agreement is for the District and the County, at City's request, to provide technical assistance, fund securing assistance, and potentially temporary operations assistance for the System; that during the course of this Agreement all parties shall seek funding to help pay for the corrective actions sought to be cured in the Enforcement Action, the operation of the System, and to otherwise upgrade the System; WHEREAS, it is the further intent of all of the parties that City remains solely responsible for compliance with applicable rules, permits, orders, and other environmental requirements of FDEP and other governmental agencies, notwithstanding the District's and the County's agreement to temporarily serve as City's technical consultant for the System; and WHEREAS, the parties understand City remains solely responsible for compliance with applicable rules, permits, orders, and other environmental requirements of FDEP and other governmental agencies, notwithstanding the District's agreement to potentially and temporarily serve as the City's agent for the operation of the System, and that the District's rate payers should not be asked, and cannot be asked, to subsidize the water and wastewater utility system for the residents of City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: Page 2 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1395 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical AGREEMENT 1. Recitals. The parties acknowledge that all of the Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby expressly incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. 2. Effective Date. The "Effective Date" of this Agreement shall be December 13, 2017. 3. Services. City hereby retains District and County to provide, and District and County hereby are retained to provide Services (as defined below)to City as City's consultant regarding the management of the System, subject to all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement, and potentially as the City's temporary operator, subject to all terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement,the term "Services" shall include: a) Technical Assistance. As of the Effective Date, District and County will provide technical assistance to City as requested by City in writing in the form of Technical Assistance Requests(hereinafter defined), per the procedure in Section 3.(a)(i),to assist the City in managing the System. Technical assistance includes anything related to managing the System and District and County shall make available their contractors, including engineers, to provide the technical assistance. Additionally, technical assistance includes providing recommendations to City as well as working with City to apply for grants, loans, and funding of any type for the System. i) "Technical Assistance Requests". City shall prepare each Technical Assistance Request and in each Technical Assistance Request include a description of the desired technical assistance and the time period of the assistance, and shall be emailed to the Collier County Department Head of Public Utilities, Dr. George Yilmaz, GeorgeYilmaz@colliergov.net. b) Operations and Routine Maintenance. If City's operation agreement with VWNA, attached as Exhibit A, prematurely terminates for any reason, following written notice by the mayor of City, District shall then become the City's temporary emergency operator for a period not to exceed 3 months with an optional extension of an additional 3 months, if both parties agree in writing to the extension (the "Operations Period"). Notwithstanding the foregoing the Operations Period will not extend beyond the term of this agreement. As City's temporary emergency operator, District will (1) utilize the State and/or Federal and/or other funds consistent with the terms and conditions of the grants; and (2) conduct and initiate towards earliest completion reasonable and prudent capital improvements and maintenance operations of the System, provided written consent from mayor of City, to ensure its reliable and efficient, continued operation, and to prevent the deterioration or degradation of the System to the extent reasonably practical in light of funds received from the collection of rates, user fees, and other charges or directly from City. Outside of the requirements for the State and/or Federal and/or other funding, District is not obligated to undertake or to fund any improvements to the System necessary to ensure continued operation or compliance with applicable environmental rules or requirements. Page 3 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1396 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 4. District and County Compensation for Technical Assistance. Quarterly, County will provide the City with a detailed invoice outlining all actual costs incurred by District and County, including staff time, starting from the commencement of this Agreement. The City will repay the County, without interest, if and when the City is able to do so. There is no deadline on when payments must begin. 5. District and County Compensation as Operator. The District will be compensated by City for District's full cost in operating the System, including personnel, contractors, consultant's, and equipment, on a monthly basis to cover general administrative costs. Capital improvements will be reimbursed by the City but only if approved in advance by the City in writing. District shall provide City with an accounting of these costs on a monthly basis. City shall remain responsible for all costs and expenses associated with operation of the System. District shall have no obligation to expend any of its own funds to ensure continued operation under this Agreement. 6.Term and Option to Terminate for Convenience. Except as provided below, the term of this Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall expire on November 30, 2018. Thereafter, this Agreement will automatically extend for 1 year each year, unless either party gives the other 30 days' written notice to the contrary, in which case this Agreement shall terminate. At any time during the term of this Agreement, either City or District may terminate this Agreement for convenience and without cause, upon giving 30 days' written notice to the other party. Any obligations of either party accruing during the term of this Agreement shall survive such termination. 7. Condition of Facilities and Equipment Remain City's Responsibility. District shall not be held responsible for the condition of the System during the term of this Agreement or upon expiration of this Agreement, and shall have no responsibility to replace property or equipment, except as may result from the District's failure to complete ordinary and reasonable maintenance, or to operate the System in compliance with the standards of the industry. 8. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, Regulations, Permits, and Orders. City shall remain solely responsible for obtaining and maintaining compliance with all State, Federal, and local permits and licenses required for ownership, operation and maintenance of the System, including without limitation, City's FDEP permit and associated consent order(s). District shall notify City and all State and Federal agencies, as required by law, of any noncompliance issues discovered during the technical assistance period and as the Agent. 9. Indemnification. To the extent authorized and permitted by law and without waiver of the right of City to claim immunity under section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and without extending or altering the City's liability beyond the limits established in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, City shall indemnify, reimburse, defend, and hold harmless the District, and each of its directors, officers, and employees, as well as the Collier County Board of Commissioners, each of the Commissioners,the Collier County Manager,all of the employees of Collier County and the Collier County Public Utilities Department(collectively,the "Indemnified Parties"),for,from, and against all demands, claims, actions or causes of action, assessments, losses, damages, liabilities, costs Page 4 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1397 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical and expenses (including, without limitation, interest, penalties, reasonable attorneys' fees, disbursements and expenses, and reasonable consultants' fees, disbursements and expenses but excluding internal overhead, administrative, lost opportunity and similar costs), asserted against, resulting to, imposed on, or incurred by any Indemnified Party, directly or indirectly, in connection with any claim asserted by the FDEP, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or any third party involving pollution or threat to human health or the environment that is related in any way to the City's management, use, control, ownership or operation of the System whether occurring, existing or arising prior to or after the Effective Date of this Agreement (except to the extent same are directly and solely caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any Indemnified Party). 10. Representations and Warranties of City. City represents and warrants that: a) City is validly organized and exists as a municipality in the State of Florida, and has full power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted and as contemplated in this Agreement. b) City has full power and authority to execute and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement. The execution and performance of the terms and provisions of this Agreement does not violate any applicable provision of the City charter or other authorizing law, the City's ordinances,or state or federal laws or regulations,or other agreements or rules by which the City may be bound. c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the City and constitutes its legal, valid, and binding obligation enforceable in accordance with its terms. 11. Representations and Warranties of District. District represents and warrants that: a) District is validly organized and exists as an independent special district in the State of Florida and has full power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted and as contemplated in this Agreement. b) District has full power and authority to execute and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement. The execution and performance of the terms and provisions of this Agreement does not violate any applicable provision of law creating or authorizing the District, any bylaws of the District, or any state or federal regulations, or other agreements or rules by which the District may be bound. c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the District and constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable in accordance with its terms. 12. Representations and Warranties of County. County represents and warrants that: Page 5 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical a) County is validly organized and exists as a county in the State of Florida and has full power and authority to carry on its business as presently conducted and as contemplated in this Agreement. b) County has full power and authority to execute and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement. The execution and performance of the terms and provisions of this Agreement does not violate any applicable provision of law creating or authorizing County, any rules of County, or any state or federal regulations,or other agreements or rules by which County may be bound. c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by County and constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable in accordance with its terms. 13. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Florida. In the event of any dispute under this Agreement,the parties shall attempt to resolve such dispute first by non-binding mediation, with each party paying equal costs for the mediation, prior to commencing any formal action or procedure. The Parties consent to jurisdiction over them in the State of Florida and agree that venue for any state action arising under this Agreement shall lie solely in the courts located in Collier County, Florida. 14. Amendment and Assignment. This Agreement can only be amended or assigned by mutual written consent of the parties hereto with the same formalities as it was executed. 15. Notice. All notices and other communications required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and addressed as follows: To District: To City: Collier County Manager's Office City of Everglades City 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 P.O. Box 110 Naples, FL 34112-5746 Everglades City, FL 34139 Phone: (239) 252-8383 To County: Collier County Manager's Office 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34112-5746 Phone: (239) 252-8383 Page 6 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1399 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 16. Merger and Integration Clause. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters noted herein. All prior representations, undertakings, and agreements by or between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement are merged into, and expressed in, this Agreement, and any and all prior representations, undertakings, and agreements by and between such parties with respect thereto,are hereby canceled, except for any task orders under the Interlocal Agreement between the City and Collier County dated September 26, 2017, ("Hurricane Irma Interlocal Agreement") as well as the Hurricane Irma Interlocal Agreement itself. 17. Counterpart. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which togethers shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the dates first above written. owa104.1 4 Collier County Water-Sewer District: ATTEST:BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS EXQFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT ,` / t,tttsa>> ttti"'lo C/1 B By: est as t0 Chei ; ty Clerk PENNY TAY , CHAIRM signature only App ;.ved as to form and legality for the Colli:r C tntyNater-Sewer District: Jeffrey A. Kl?tzkow CountyAtt ' ney Page 7 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1400 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical Collier County: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER OU , FLORIDA rir. By:CC),„..KipSiD4L_B y; Attest a thaln sty Clerk PENNY TAY , CHAIRM fflr signature•by. Approved a to form and legality for Collier Colny:t Jeffrey A. Kiatzkow County Attorney t Page 8 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1401 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical City of Everglades City ATTEST: City of Everglades City 1 1 al Or/ By: 46.-By: ‘,/ Dottie Joiner, Cit lerk HOWE GRIMM JR., MAYOR City of Everglades City Approved as to form and legal sufficiency for the City: 4or Ci ty Atto -y for the CityArof ides C ity Page 9 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1402 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical Exhibit A VWNA Operations Agreement Page 10 of 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 7th day of November, 2017 (the "Effective Date"), by and between City of Everglades City, a Florida municipality, with its mailing address at P.O. Box 110, Everglades City, FL 34139 (hereinafter OWNER") and Veolia Water North America — South, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company having a Florida mailing address and office at 14055 Riveredge Drive, Suite 240, Tampa, FL 33637 (hereinafter VWNA"). WHEREAS, OWNER owns and provides for the operation of a water and wastewater system, including maintenance, repair, expansion, administration, billing, collection, customer service,and permitting functions; WHEREAS, OWNER, due to various circumstances can no longer effectively provide for the operation, maintenance,and repair of the water and wastewater system; WHEREAS, failure to engage an operator immediately to operate, maintain, and repair OWNER'S water and wastewater systems will create an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare of the residents of OWNER; WHEREAS, following Hurricane Irma, OWNER desires to procure VWNA on an emergency basis to perform the operation, maintenance, repair functions for the compensation provided for herein; WHEREAS, OWNER accepts that VWNA will operate, maintain, and repair the water and wastewater system in its current condition and OWNER will allow and pay for certain necessary improvements, such as adding telemetry and purchasing critical spares as needed to operate effectively; WHEREAS, it is the intent of OWNER and VWNA to, immediately after execution hereof, begin negotiating a contract to manage the wastewater and water systems; WHEREAS, this is not an Agreement for professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping services. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 1 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1404 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, OWNER and VWNA agree as follows: 1. General 1.1 Definitions of words and phrases used in this Agreement and the attachments are contained in Appendix A. 1.2 All land, buildings, facilities, easements, licenses, rights-of-way, equipment, and vehicles presently or hereinafter acquired or owned by OWNER shall remain the exclusive property of OWNER unless specifically provided for otherwise in this Agreement. 1.3 This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The parties consent to jurisdiction over them in the State of Florida and agree that venue for any state action arising under this Agreement shall lie solely in the courts located in Collier County, Florida, and for any federal action shall lie solely in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ft. Myers Division. 1.4 This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of each of the parties, but neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 1.5 All notices shall be in writing and transmitted to the party's address stated above. All notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered personally or by courier mail service, i.e., Federal Express or Airborne Express, delivered after such notice has been deposited in the United States mail postage prepaid, if mailed certified or registered U.S. mail, return receipt requested; or received by the party for which notice is intended if given in any other manner. 1.6 This Agreement, including Appendices A through G, is the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by both parties. Wherever used, the terms "VWNA" and OWNER" shall include the respective officers, agents, directors, elected or appointed officials, and employees, and, where appropriate, subcontractors or anyone acting on their behalf. 1.7 If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.2 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 1.8 It is understood that the relationship of VWNA to OWNER is that of independent contractor. The services provided under this Agreement are of a professional nature and shall be performed in accordance with good and accepted industry practices for contract operators similarly situated. However, such services shall not be considered engineering services, and nothing herein is intended to imply that VWNA is to supply professional engineering services to OWNER unless specifically stated in this Agreement to the contrary. 1.9 If any litigation is necessary to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of travel for attorneys, witnesses and other representatives of the Parties which are directly attributed to such litigation in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. 1.10 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create in any third party or in favor of any third party any right(s), license(s), power(s), or privilege(s). 1.11 Prior to the commencement of work under this Agreement, each party shall designate in writing an employee or other representative of the designating party who shall have full authority to approve changes in the Scope of Work and compensation therefor, execute written Change Orders reflecting such changes, render decisions promptly, and furnish information expeditiously to the other party when necessary. 1.12 This Agreement is to be interpreted in accordance with its plain meaning and, because this Agreement is the product of mutual drafting, each party having been represented by or having the opportunity to be represented by counsel, this Agreement is not to be construed against either party. 2. VWNA's Duties: General 2.1 VWNA shall provide a sufficient number, as required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("FDEP"), of certified and qualified personnel, including management, administrative, operational, technical, laboratory, and clerical, who meet relevant State of Florida requirements and certifications regarding water and wastewater treatment operations, maintenance, and management and are capable and demonstrate experience necessary to operate the facilities covered by this Agreement. VWNA proposes to staff the Project as set forth in the organization chart attached as Appendix E. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 3 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 2.2 VWNA shall provide ongoing training and education for appropriate personnel in all necessary areas of modern water and/or wastewater process control, maintenance, safety, and supervisory skills. 2.3 VWNA shall develop and/or supply and utilize computerized programs for maintenance, process control, cost accounting, and laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control. Such programs shall be capable of readily providing historical data and trends. 2.4 VWNA shall, within fifteen (15) days after the Commencement Date, provide a physical inventory of OWNER's vehicles and equipment in use at the Project and a general statement as to the condition of each vehicle or piece of equipment. 2.5 VWNA shall provide OWNER with a physical inventory of chemicals and other consumables on hand at the Commencement Date. VWNA will provide OWNER with the same quantity of chemicals or equivalent upon termination of this Agreement. 2.6 VWNA shall be responsible for maintaining all manufacturers' warranties on new equipment purchased by OWNER and assist OWNER in enforcing existing equipment warranties and guarantees. 2.7 VWNA shall provide OWNER with full documentation that preventive maintenance is being performed on OWNER's owned equipment in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations at intervals and in sufficient detail as may be determined by OWNER. Such a maintenance program must include documentation of corrective and preventive maintenance and a spare parts inventory. 2.8 VWNA shall operate, maintain, and/or monitor the Project on a 24-hour per day, seven days per week schedule. The 24-hour per day, seven days per week monitoring system must be designed and operated such that it will notify VWNA prior to the occurrence of an impending overflow, spill, or unauthorized discharge; providing VWNA sufficient time to implement appropriate action in a timely manner to prevent the overflow, spill, or unauthorized discharge. Additionally, per the FDEP requirements, (a) the water treatment facilities will only be staffed Monday through Friday for a minimum of three (3) hours a day with one visit each weekend day by a Class C operator or higher, and (b) the wastewater treatment facilities only will be staffed seven days a week for a minimum of six(6) hours a day by a Class C operator or higher. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.4 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1407 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 2.9 Visits may be made at a reasonable time by OWNER's officers so designated by OWNER's representative. Keys for the Project shall be provided to OWNER by VWNA for such visits. All visitors to the Project shall comply with VWNA's operating and safety procedures. 2.10 VWNA shall implement and maintain an employee safety program in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations and make recommendations to OWNER regarding the need, if any,for OWNER to rehabilitate, expand or modify the Project to comply with governmental safety regulations applicable to VWNA's operations hereunder and federal regulations promulgated pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Nothing herein shall be construed to place upon VWNA a duty to find and report violations of either the safety laws or the ADA at the Facility. 2.11 VWNA may modify the process and/or facilities to achieve the objectives of this Agreement and such costs shall be considered Other Direct Expenses; provided, however, any modification in excess of four thousand dollars ($4,000.00) shall be considered a Capital Expenditure. VWNA will prioritize safety and permit compliance issues. 2.12 VWNA may, after the Effective Date, during any emergency affecting the safety of persons or property, without written amendment or change order, at VWNA's discretion, act to prevent threatened damage, injury, or loss. VWNA shall be compensated by OWNER for any such emergency work performed notwithstanding the lack of a written amendment. Such compensation will include VWNA's non-labor direct costs for the emergency work. Notwithstanding the foregoing, absent a request or change order from OWNER, nothing contained in this Section shall impose upon VWNA an affirmative duty to perform any emergency work and failure to perform any such emergency work shall not impose upon VWNA any liability for errors and omissions for emergency work the costs of which exceed $5,000. In the event of an emergency, the primary VWNA representative shall be Keith Mullins, (352) 302-4096 keith.mullins@veolia.com, and the primary contact for the OWNER shall be the OWNER's mayor. 2.13 VWNA shall, as required by law, permit, or court order, prepare plant performance reports and submit them to OWNER for signature and transmittal to appropriate authorities. These reports will include the monthly, quarterly, and annual reports and system evaluations identified in the Consent Order for the water and sewer system. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 5 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 2.14 VWNA shall provide laboratory testing and sampling presently required by plant performance portions of the Consent Order, the NPDES permit, the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and/or any federal, state, or local rules and regulations, statutes, or ordinances, permit or license requirements or judicial and regulatory orders and decrees. If and when OWNER implements an industrial pretreatment program, VWNA shall additionally provide technical and analytical services to OWNER to assist OWNER in managing such Industrial Pretreatment Program including sampling, monitoring, and preparation of the required reports. There is no Industrial Pretreatment Program in place as of the Effective Date. 2.15 VWNA shall provide for the collection and hauling of Waste from the wastewater facility to OWNER's existing or approved disposal sites. It shall be the sole right and responsibility of OWNER to select disposal sites to be used by VWNA for OWNER's Waste. All Waste and/or byproduct treated and/or generated during VWNA's performance of services is and shall remain the sole and exclusive property of OWNER. All manifests or other documentation required for disposal of Waste shall be signed by or in the name of OWNER. 2.16 VWNA shall, within the first ninety (90) days after the Commencement Date, provide OWNER with a listing of recommended facility improvements, that may include Capital Expenditures, that VWNA believes will be required to remedy the problems impacting the Project as of the Effective Date (the "Facility Improvements"). VWNA shall develop an asset management plan as part of this Agreement. VWNA shall work with Owner to identify and perform Facility Improvements until such time as the new wastewater treatment plant is designed, constructed, and commissioned and is in working order and capable of meeting their effluent requirements. Additionally, VWNA shall work with Owner to confirm the validity and necessity in completing, including, but not limited to, a review of the twenty-five items identified as Corrective Actions within the Consent Order,Section 5(a). 2.17 VWNA shall use reasonable efforts, using the OWNER's odor control equipment as well as best practices, to control odors from the Facility. The Parties agree and acknowledge that as of the Effective Date, OWNER does not have any odor control equipment. 2.18 VWNA shall provide OWNER with a full accounting of all expenditures at intervals and in sufficient detail as may be determined by OWNER, and assist OWNER in the preparation of annual operating budgets. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.6 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 2.19 At the request of OWNER,VWNA may agree, but shall not be obligated to agree,to implement the Capital Expenditures identified in Section 2.16 or as otherwise identified throughout the term to be compensated in accordance with this Agreement. 3. VWNA's Duties:Wastewater Treatment Plant 3.1 This Article shall apply to VWNA's services for OWNER's wastewater treatment system. 3.2 Within the design capacity and capabilities of the wastewater treatment plant described in detail in Appendix B,VWNA will manage, operate, and maintain the wastewater treatment plant designed to treat an Annual Average Flow of 0.160 million gallons a day so that effluent discharged from the Plant's outfalls meets the requirements specified in Appendix C-1. VWNA shall use reasonable efforts consistent with prudent industry practices to operate the wastewater treatment plant to the maximum of its potential in its condition as of the Effective Date until the new design, construction, and commissioning of the new wastewater treatment plant is complete. "Prudent Industry Practices" for this Agreement shall include regular sludge hauling, influent and effluent testing, process control testing including dissolved oxygen and settleable solids, process control management plans, and weekly process control meetings of operators. VWNA shall monitor all wastewater entering the wastewater treatment plant and treat all such wastewater in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and applicable law. 3.3 Subject to the availability of funds within the Facilities Budget for Maintenance and Repair expenses, VWNA will perform all Maintenance and Repairs for the Wastewater portion of the Project. VWNA will prioritize safety and permit compliance issues. 4. VWNA's Duties:Water Treatment Plant 4.1 This Article shall apply to VWNA's services for OWNER's water treatment plant. 4.2 Within the design capacity and capabilities of the water treatment plant described in more detail in Appendix B, VWNA will manage, operate and maintain the water treatment plant designed to treat 0.465 million gallons per day so that finished water produced from the plant meets the requirements specified in Appendix C-2. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.7 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1410 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 4.3 Subject to the availability of funds within the Facilities Budget for Maintenance and Repair expenses, VWNA will perform all Maintenance and Repairs for the Water portion of the Project. 5. VWNA's Duties:Wastewater Collection System and Water Distribution System 5.1 This Article shall apply to VWNA's maintenance and repair services for OWNER's wastewater collection system and the water distribution system serving OWNER. The collection system and water distribution system are described in Appendix B. 5.2 VWNA will maintain and repair the wastewater collection system and the water distribution system. VWNA's responsibility for the wastewater collection system shall end at the Customer's property line. VWNA's responsibility for the water distribution system shall end at the Customer's water meter, or where no water meter exists, at the Customer's property line. 5.3 Sewer Back-Up Procedure. From and after the inception of the Term of this Agreement, VWNA shall establish (i) a routine, normal sewer line preventative maintenance program, and (ii) corrective procedures to be implemented in the event of any personal injury or property damage resulting from a sewer back-up which will consist of the following: 5.3.1 Upon receipt of a Customer notice, VWNA will determine whether the cause of the sewer back-up was an obstruction in OWNER's grinder pump station, lateral line or the Customer's house line; 5.3.2 If the obstruction is a result of OWNER's grinder pump station, VWNA (i) will determine the root cause failure and implement corrective action to return / repair the grinder pump station to normal service operation (ii) document the approximate date and time of the obstruction; (iii) determine the extent of the personal injury or property damage, if any; iv) contact a predetermined water remediation company to clean up the sewer back-up and to minimize any damage, the cost of which will be paid by OWNER; and (v) provide notice to OWNER's insurance carrier of the potential loss claim; 5.3.3 If the obstruction is in OWNER's lateral line, VWNA will (i) remove the cause of the sewer line obstruction by implementation of its corrective procedures; (ii) document the approximate date and time of the obstruction; (iii) determine the extent of the personal injury or property damage, if any; (iv) contact a predetermined water remediation company to clean up the sewer back-up and to minimize any damage, the cost of Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 8 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical which will be paid by OWNER; and (v) provide notice to OWNER of the potential loss claim; 5.3.4 If the sewer line back-up is the Customer's house line, VWNA will advise the Customer to contact a water remediation service company and Customer's homeowner's insurance carrier; and 5.3.5 If the Customer files a claim against OWNER or VWNA, VWNA will notify OWNER of the potential loss claim. 5.4 Except as provided in Subsection 8.1 below, after completing the procedure set forth in Subsections 5.3.1 through 5.3.5 above, VWNA shall have no further responsibility or liability to OWNER or the Customer(s) for the personal injury or property damage caused by the sewer back-up or the consequences thereof. 6. OWNER's Duties: 6.1 OWNER shall fund or reimburse all necessary Capital Expenditures, which will be performed by VWNA under written change orders-to this Agreement. Any loss, damage, or injury resulting from OWNER's failure to provide Facility Improvements and/or funds in excess of the Facilities Budget Maintenance and Repair expenses when reasonably requested by VWNA shall be the sole responsibility of OWNER. 6.2 OWNER shall keep in force all Project warranties, guarantees, easements, and licenses that have been granted to OWNER and are not transferred to VWNA under this Agreement. 6.3 Except as otherwise set forth in the Owner Direct Purchase Program attached hereto as Appendix F, OWNER shall pay all sales, excise, ad valorem, property, franchise, occupational, and disposal taxes, or other taxes associated with the Project other than taxes imposed upon VWNA's net income and/or payroll taxes for VWNA employees. 6.4 OWNER shall provide VWNA, within a reasonable time after request and on an "as available" basis, with the temporary use of any piece of OWNER's heavy equipment that is available so that VWNA may discharge its obligations under this Agreement in the most cost-effective manner. 6.5 OWNER shall provide all registrations and licenses for OWNER's vehicles used in connection with the Project. 6.6 OWNER shall procure vehicles and equipment for VWNA's exclusive use at the Project; provided, however, if the OWNER is unable to procure such vehicles and equipment, or Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.9 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical if a vehicle or equipment is no longer in good working order, VWNA reserves the right to rent, lease, or procure, on a temporary basis,vehicles or equipment as necessary to discharge its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, VWNA shall not make any purchase or any long-term commitment for forty-five (45) days during which time period OWNER shall decide to either(i) rent, lease or procure the vehicle or equipment or(ii) provide consent for VWNA to rent, lease or procure such vehicle or equipment. 6.7 OWNER shall provide for VWNA's entry into existing disposal sites for disposal of garbage, screenings,grit, sludge, and scum. 6.8 OWNER shall protect against any losses resulting from the theft, damage, or unauthorized use of property owned by OWNER and shall accept liability for such losses except to the extent such losses are directly caused by the negligent acts or omissions of VWNA. 6.9 OWNER, through the capital work provided by VWNA, shall be responsible for paying all costs associated with: (i) bringing the Project into compliance with Consent Order. OWNER acknowledges and agrees that OWNER shall be responsible for any fines or civil penalties imposed by any regulatory or enforcement agencies resulting from OWNER's failure to comply with the Consent Order and/or implement any risk management programs. 6.10 OWNER shall keep in force any project warranties, guarantees, easements, and licenses that have been granted to OWNER and are not transferred to VWNA under this Agreement. 6.11 OWNER shall continue to be responsible and pay for the general administration and enforcement of (i) the water, wastewater, collection and distribution systems, (ii) OWNER's Industrial Pretreatment Program, (iii) new water and sewer connections unless VWNA is retained to perform such functions, and (iv) long-term system and service area planning. Typical administration costs associated with the above activities include costs such as the services of the auditor, lawyer, liability insurance, and property insurance covering the Project. 6.12 In order to enable VWNA to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, OWNER shall provide VWNA. free of charge, with such facilities (including,without limitation, offices, locker rooms, showers,toilets and parking spaces)and utilities (including, without limitation, water, electricity, high-speed internet and telephone lines) which are reasonably necessary for VWNA, its employees and its subcontractors or agents to provide the Services. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 10 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 7. Compensation 7.1 The Annual Fee shall be payable in twelve monthly installments based upon the then effective Facilities Budget as provided in this Section 8 and as adjusted pursuant to the true-up of Reimbursable Operating Expenses described below. OWNER shall pay to VWNA an amount equal to one-twelfth (1/12th) of the total Facilities Budget for the Project for such Fiscal Year which shall be due and payable on the first of the month for each month that services are provided. In addition, invoices shall include any true up amounts to account for differences between the Reimbursable Operating Expenses set forth on the Facilities Budget for the two months prior to the invoice date and the actual Reimbursable Operating Expenses for such month. For example, the invoice dated September 1 for payment due October 1 (October services) will include a true-up of July Reimbursable Operating Expenses. The Overhead Allocation for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 shall be forty-five thousand seventy-seven dollars ($45,077.00). 7.2 The Overhead Allocation shall be adjusted annually by multiplying the existing Overhead Allocation by the greater of either one hundred two percent (multiply by 1.02), or one plus the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (U.S. City Average) - All Items - not seasonally adjusted (CUUROOOOSAO) as published by the U. S. Department of Labor Statistics three months and fifteen months prior to the beginning of the period for which the adjusted Overhead Allocation is being calculated. 7.3 On or prior to the Effective Date VWNA will provide OWNER with a proposed Facilities Budget for Fiscal Year 2017-2018. If the Agreement is extended per section 9.1, with respect to each Fiscal Year following the Fiscal Year that will end September 30, 2018, VWNA shall, on or before three months prior to the beginning of each Fiscal Year, furnish to OWNER a Facilities Budget for the Fiscal Year that begins on the immediately succeeding first day of the Fiscal Year. If the Facilities Budget reflects an increase in average wage rate ($/hr) included in Labor Expenses of five percent (5%) or more, such Facilities Budget remains subject to the approval of OWNER, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 7.4 The Facilities Budget may, by the mutual agreement of VWNA and OWNER, be revised at any time during a Fiscal Year as a result of increases or decreases in Reimbursable Operating Expenses. In the event of the reconfiguration or consolidation of the Project during a Fiscal Year, the parties will cooperate in revising the Facilities Budget for the Fiscal Year during which the reconfiguration or consolidation becomes operative to the extent that such event had not been anticipated and reflected in the then effective Facilities Budget. 7.5 VWNA will seek OWNER's review and approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld by OWNER, prior to incurring or performing any Capital Expenditures. VWNA is specifically authorized by OWNER to incur and/or perform Corrective Maintenance and Repair items Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 11 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical and Preventive or Predictive Maintenance items that are less than a $4,000 per item and other Reimbursable Operating Expenses without seeking further review and approval from OWNER. VWNA and OWNER shall meet and resolve any request for Capital Expenditures as soon as possible, and no later than fifteen (15) business days, unless City Council approval is required, in which case, OWNER shall have until the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting, after a request for approval is made by VWNA. VWNA and OWNER will work cooperatively to come to an agreement regarding the optimal solution to minimize delays in addressing the identified problem. VWNA shall be entitled to relief to the extent that OWNER rejects an expense item and it negatively impacts VWNA's ability to perform and fulfill its obligations under the Agreement and/or to the extent such rejection results in any loss, damage, noncompliance, or injury. 7.6 VWNA will invoice OWNER for Capital Expenditures and may include the amount due as an additional value within the monthly invoices described in Section 7.1 or submit individual invoices for the specific events and expenses. Should individual invoices be submitted for payment, OWNER shall pay such invoices pursuant to the Florida Prompt Payment Act, including any interest due in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act. 7.7 VWNA shall utilize the attached proposed Everglades City Authorization Request as referenced in Appendix G. VWNA representatives shall complete the Authorization Request as well as VWNA internal pricing guidelines. The completed document shall be issued to the respective OWNER representative for approval. 7.8 VWNA shall use the Owner Direct Purchase Program outlined in Appendix F when making any Capital Expenditures. 7.9 All invoices shall be submitted in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act as it applies. All payments shall be due on the date established by the Florida Prompt Payment Act. Payment due date for purchase of goods or services other than construction services is net forty-five (45) days from the date an invoice submitted in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act is received by OWNER. In the event of a disputed invoice, only that portion so contested will be withheld from payment and the undisputed portion shall be due and payable on the terms set forth herein. OWNER does not pay sales tax and will provide sales tax exemption information at the written request of VWNA, where necessary. VWNA may charge, and OWNER shall pay, interest due for late payments in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act. 8. Indemnity, Liability,and Insurance 8.1 VWNA shall indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any liability or damages for bodily injury, including death, property damages, and pollution damages which may arise from VWNA's negligence or willful misconduct under this Agreement; Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 12 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical provided, VWNA shall be liable only for that percentage of total damages that corresponds to its percentage of total negligence or fault. 8.2 OWNER shall indemnify and hold VWNA harmless from any liability or damage or bodily injury, including death, property damages, and pollution damages which may arise from OWNER's negligence or willful misconduct under this Agreement; provided, OWNER shall be liable only for that percentage of total damages that corresponds to its percentage of total negligence or fault. 8.3 Unless covered by the indemnities contained in Sections 8.1 and 8.2, neither VWNA nor OWNER shall be liable to the other in any action or claim for consequential, incidental, or special damages, loss of profits, loss of opportunity, loss of product, or loss of use. Any protection against liability for losses or damages afforded any individual or entity by these terms shall apply whether the action in which recovery of damages is sought is based on contract, tort (including sole, concurrent or other negligence and strict liability of any protected individual or entity), statute, or otherwise. To the extent permitted by law, any statutory remedies, which are inconsistent with these terms, are waived, except for sovereign immunity, which is not waived. 8.4 VWNA shall be liable for those fines or civil penalties imposed by a regulatory or enforcement agency for violations occurring on or after Commencement Date of the effluent quality requirements provided for in Appendix C-1 or the finished water quality provided for Appendix C-2 that are a result of VWNA's negligence. OWNER will assist VWNA to contest any such fines in administrative proceedings and/or in court prior to any payment by VWNA. VWNA shall pay the cost of any such contest. 8.5 OWNER shall be liable for those fines or civil penalties imposed by any regulatory or enforcement agencies on OWNER and/or VWNA that occurred or arose from incidents occurring prior to Commencement Date or are not a result of VWNA's negligence or are otherwise directly related to the ownership of the Project and shall indemnify and hold VWNA harmless from the payment of any such fines and/or penalties. 8.6 To the fullest extent permitted by law and notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, VWNA's liability for performance or non-performance of any obligation arising under the Agreement (whether arising under breach of contract, tort, strict liability, or any other theory of law or equity) including, but not limited to its indemnity obligations specified in Section 8.1 of the Agreement, shall not exceed the then current Annual Fee cumulatively for the duration of the Agreement, provided that the foregoing limitation shall not apply to any losses resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of VWNA or Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 13 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical VWNA's subcontractors, employees, or agents in breach of VWNA's obligations under this Agreement. 8.7 Each party shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage of a type and in the amounts described in Appendix D. Each party shall provide the other party with satisfactory proof of insurance. 8.8 Nothing in this Agreement is a waiver by OWNER of any immunity or limitation of liability the OWNER may be entitled to under the doctrine of sovereign immunity or section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 8.9 The provisions of Sections 8.1 through 8.8 above shall survive the termination of the Agreement. 9. Term,Termination, and Default 9.1 The initial term of this Agreement shall be one year commencing November 8, 2017 Initial Term"). Thereafter, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive terms of one year each unless canceled in writing by either party no less than one hundred and twenty(120) days prior to expiration. 9.2 A party may terminate this Agreement only for a material breach of the Agreement by the other party; only after giving written notice of breach; and, except in case of a breach by OWNER for nonpayment of VWNA's invoices, in which case termination may be immediate by VWNA, only after allowing the other party thirty (30) days to cure or commence taking reasonable steps to cure the breach. 9.3 In the event that this Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to the ending date of the Initial Term, OWNER shall pay to VWNA any funds identified in Sections 7.1, Sections 7.2 and Sections 7.6 that have not been paid to VWNA through the date of termination. 9.4 Upon notice of termination by OWNER, VWNA shall assist OWNER in assuming operation of the Project. If additional Cost is incurred by VWNA at request of OWNER, OWNER shall pay VWNA such Cost within 30 days of invoice receipt. 9.5 Upon termination of this Agreement and any renewals and extensions of it, VWNA will return the Project to OWNER in the same condition as it was upon completion of the Facility Improvements, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Equipment and other personal property purchased by VWNA for use in the operation or maintenance of the Project shall remain the property of VWNA upon termination of this Agreement unless the property was directly paid for by OWNER or Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 14 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical OWNER specifically reimbursed VWNA for the cost incurred to purchase the property or this Agreement provides to the contrary. 10. Disputes and Force Majeure 10.1 Neither party shall be liable for its failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement if such failure is due to any Unforeseen Circumstances or force majeure. However, this Section may not be used by either party to avoid, delay or otherwise affect any payments due to the other party. 11. Public Records 11.1 VWNA shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other materials subject to the provisions of chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by VWNA in conjunction with the Agreement. 11.2 The Parties acknowledge that failure to cooperate with any public records requests shall be considered a material breach for purposes of Section 9.2 of this Agreement. 11.3 IF VWNA HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO VWNA'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT (239) 695-3781, DSMALLWOOD@CITYOFEVERGLADES.ORG, 102 COPELAND AVE. NORTH EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139. 11.4 Further,VWNA agrees to comply with Florida's public records laws, specifically to: a. Keep and maintain public records required by OWNER to perform the service. b. Upon request from the OWNER'S custodian of public records, provide OWNER with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in chapter 119, or as otherwise provided by law. c. Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the Term and following completion of the contract if VWNA does not transfer the records to OWNER. d. Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to OWNER all public records in possession of VWNA or keep and maintain public records required by VWNA to perform the service. If VWNA transfers all public records to the OWNER upon completion of the contract, VWNA shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If VWNA keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, VWNA shall Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 15 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to OWNER, upon request from the OWNER'S custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of OWNER. Both parties indicate their approval of this Agreement by their signatures below, and each party warrants that all corporate or governmental action necessary to bind the parties to the terms of this Agreement has been and will be taken. VEOLIA WATER NORTH AMERICA - SOUTH, LLC Name: Si' ,_. ' '^r Title: ,|e . ' , m , / *r/+x7-0'*4S Date: /9/ 7/'^ 0 /'/ OWNER Th N__ ` - mr= tnd{person Councilperson Coundipeoon d A /EST: Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 16 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical d, i- efippr ayif f/0444 Counci person Dottie Joiner,lerk Councilperson Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 17 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL The undersigned, as counsel for Everglades City ("OWNER") in this transaction, hereby certifies that (s)he has examined the circumstances surrounding the selection of Veolia Water North America —South, LLC ("VWNA") and the award and letting of the foregoing contract to VWNA by OWNER, and has found that said selection and award process comply with the procurement laws of the State of Florida and OWNER. Date: // / Counsel for OWNER Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 18 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS A.1 "Adequate Nutrients" means plant influent nitrogen, phosphorus and iron contents proportional to BODS in the ratio of five (5) parts nitrogen, one (I) part phosphorus, and one-half(0.5) part iron for each one hundred (100) parts BODS. A.2 "Administrative Fee" means a fee payable by OWNER to VWNA for coordinating Capital Expenditures, the specific amount of which will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis, but will never exceed 13%. A.3 "Annual Fee" is the sum of (i) the Reimbursable Operating Expenses multiplied by thirteen percent(13%) plus (ii)the Overhead Allocation. A.4 "Biologically Toxic Substances" means any substance or combination of substances contained in the plant influent in sufficiently high concentration so as to interfere with the biological processes necessary for the removal of the organic and chemical constituents of the wastewater required to meet the discharge requirements of OWNER's Certificate of Approval. Biologically toxic substances include, but are not limited to, heavy metals, phenols, cyanides, pesticides and herbicides. A.5 "Capital Expenditures" means any expenditures for (1) Corrective Maintenance and Repairs that exceed Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000); (2) Preventive or Predictive Maintenance that exceeds Four Thousand Dollars($4,000) or(2) expenditures related to Facility Improvements that exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) or any other out of scope expenditures that are authorized by OWNER. Capital Expenditures shall be paid to VWNA at cost plus an Administrative Fee. A.6 "Commencement Date" shall mean November 13, 2017. A.7 "Consent Order" means that certain Florida Department of Environmental Protection Consent Order, OGC File No. 13-0853-11-W, dated March 27, 2013. A.8 "Corrective Maintenance and Repairs" means those non-routine/non-repetitive Maintenance activities required for operational continuity, safety, and performance, reasonably necessary to respond to or avert failure of the equipment used in connection with the operation of the Facility,or a component thereof. A.9 "Customer" means each person or entity having an account with OWNER and that is connected to the water or sewer system. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 19 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical A.10 "Facilities Budget" for any particular Fiscal Year means the projected Annual Fee calculated by the parties under Article VIII prior to each Fiscal Year. A.11 "Fiscal Year" means the period October 1 through September 30. A.12 "Labor Expenses" means all labor expenses, charges and costs incurred by VWNA in connection with VWNA's employees that administer, operate, maintain, repair and manage the Project and fulfill the obligations of VWNA under this Agreement, including, without limitation, salaries (regular time, overtime,vacation, holiday, sick,jury duty,and bereavement), bonuses (incentive, safety or otherwise), wage related taxes, training costs, licensing and certification expenses, worker's compensation insurance, fringe benefits including 401k contributions, welfare benefits, health benefits, defined benefit programs, and any and all other compensation and employment benefits VWNA routinely incurs, charges or allocates in connection with such employees based upon VWNA policies, programs and practices. If applicable, the allocation of localized staff shared between VWNA sites shall be included. A.13 "Maintenance" means those routine and/or repetitive activities required or recommended by the equipment or facility manufacturer or by VWNA to maximize the service life of the equipment, sewer,vehicles and facilities. A.14 "Other Direct Expenses" means any and all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses (i.e., other than Labor Expenses) incurred by VWNA in efficiently and economically administering, operating, maintaining, repairing and managing the Project and fulfilling VWNA's obligations under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the cost and expense of: (i) materials, (ii) supplies, (iii) computers, equipment and other instruments of service owned and utilized by VWNA's employees or others in performing the services and fulfilling the obligations under the Agreement, (iv) chemicals, fuel, sludge removal and disposal fees and expenses, (v) the costs incurred or allocated by VWNA for insurance and/or surety provided or carried by VWNA for its benefit and/or the benefit of OWNER in connection with performing services under the Agreement, (vi) fees for engineers, attorneys, accountants and subcontractors retained by VWNA to fulfill its obligations under the Agreement, (vii) the expenses of maintaining the Project in good repair and in good operating condition, excluding Capital Expenditures, (viii) the cost of lease, maintenance, registration, licenses and fuel for all vehicles supplied, (ix) the cost of utilities, (x) start-up and relocation costs; (xi) costs of procuring vehicles in accordance with Section 7.6, and (xii) all other cost or expense items that by generally accepted accounting principles are properly chargeable to or considered the expenses of VWNA in the administration, operation, maintenance and Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.20 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical management of the Project by VWNA based upon VWNA policies, programs and practices and the fulfillment of VWNA's obligations under this Agreement. A.15 "Overhead Allocation" means a fixed annual amount to compensate VWNA for Overhead Expenses. A.16 "Overhead Expenses" means the ongoing administrative costs and expenses of VWNA that are not attributed to any particular project or business activity but are nevertheless necessary for and incurred by VWNA to provide the services for OWNER and fulfill its obligations under the Agreement (e.g., the unallocated costs incurred at VWNA's corporate and regional departments for support, including technical services, purchasing (sourcing/procurement), human resources, finance, accounting, payroll, legal and risk management, IT, training, and environmental, health and safety as well as identifying opportunities for funding for this agreement and for any Capital Expenditures and the eventual plant rebuild of the wastewater plant from any and all sources). Specific regional support will be provided as set forth in the proposed organizational chart attached as Appendix E. A.17 "Project" means all equipment, vehicles, grounds, rights of way, sewers and facilities described in Appendix B and, where appropriate, the management, operations and maintenance of such. A.18 "Reimbursable Operating Expenses" means: (i) Labor Expenses; and (ii) Other Direct Expenses. A.19 "Repairs" means those nonroutine/nonrepetitive activities required for operational continuity, safety and performance generally due to failure or to avert a failure of the equipment, sewer,vehicles or facilities or some component thereof. A.20 "Unforeseen Circumstances" shall mean any event or condition which has an effect on the rights or obligations of the parties under this Agreement, or upon the Project, which is beyond the reasonable control of the party relying thereon and constitutes a justification for a delay in or non-performance of action required by this Agreement, including but not limited to (i) an act of God, landslide, lightning, earthquake, tornado, fire, explosion, flood, failure to possess sufficient property rights, acts of the public enemy, war, blockade, sabotage, insurrection, riot or civil disturbance, (ii) preliminary or final order of any local, province, administrative agency or governmental body of competent jurisdiction, (iii) any change in law, regulation, rule, requirement, interpretation or statute adopted, promulgated, issued or otherwise specifically modified or changed by any local, province or governmental body, (iv) labor disputes, strikes, work slowdowns or work stoppages, but excluding labor disputes, strikes, work slowdowns or work stoppages by employees of VWNA; and (v) loss of or inability to Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.21 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical obtain service from a utility necessary to furnish power for the operation and maintenance of the Project. A.21 "Waste" means all solid waste, screenings, grit, sludge, and scum produced as a by- product from the performance of operations and maintenance of the Project. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.22 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT VWNA agrees to provide the services necessary for the management, operation, and maintenance of the following: a. All grounds and facilities now existing and all equipment and vehicles now existing and/or to be procured in accordance with Section 7.6 of the Agreement within the present property boundaries of or being used to operate: The Ground Water-Membrane Treatment Plan located at 15414 Janes Memorial Scenic Drive, Copeland, FL 34137, and the Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 401 S. Copeland Ave., Everglades City, FL 33929; b. All seventeen (17) lift stations, approximately two hundred fifty(250)grinder pump stations, low pressure/gravity sewers,force mains, and manholes in service on the Commencement Date; and Lift Stations Location/Name 1 612 Collier 2 Captains Table 3 Chokoloskee Master Station#1 4 Chokoloskee Master Station#2 5 Copeland Church 6 Estuary#1 7 Estuary#2 8 Everglades Isle#1 9 Everglades Isle#2 10 Everglades School 11 Fishermans Cove 12 Glades Haven 13 Outdoor Resorts 14 Parkway 15 Partners Cove 16 Subway Hwy 41 & Hwy 29, Carnestown 17 Sunset Cove c. All water lines, meters, hydrants and valves in services on the Commencement Date. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.23 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1426 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical It is understood and agreed by both parties that this description is not complete and will not be complete until the asset management plan is developed. This Appendix will be deemed replaced by the asset management plan when that plan is completed. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.24 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1427 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical APPENDIX C-1 NPDES PERMIT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS C-1.1 VWNA will operate so that effluent will meet the requirement of NPDES Permit No. FLA027618 issued March 7, 2016, a full and complete copy of which is adopted by reference herein as of the date hereof. VWNA shall be responsible for meeting the effluent quality requirements of the Permit unless one or more of the following occurs: 1) the wastewater influent does not contain Adequate Nutrients to support operation of Project biological processes and/or contains Biologically Toxic Substances which cannot be removed by the existing process and facilities; (2) dischargers into OWNER's sewer system violate any or all regulations as stated in OWNER's Industrial Water and Sewer Ordinance(s) or as required by law; (3) the flow or influent BODS and/or suspended solids exceeds the Project design parameters which are 0.160 annual average million gallons of flow per day, TBD pounds of BODS per day monthly average, TBD pounds of suspended solids per day on a monthly average and a daily peaking factor of TBD times flow; (4) if the wastewater treatment facility and/or associated appurtenances is inoperable or can operate only at a reduced capacity on account of construction activities, fire, flood, adverse weather conditions, labor disputes or other causes beyond VWNA's control. C-1.2 VWNA will operate the water treatment plant according to State and Federal requirements. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No.25 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1428 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical APPENDIX D INSURANCE COVERAGE VWNA SHALL MAINTAIN: 1. Statutory workers compensation for all of VWNA's employees at the Project as required by the State of Florida. 2. Comprehensive general liability insurance, insuring VWNA's negligence, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits for bodily injury and/or property damage. OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN: 1. Statutory workers compensation for all of OWNER's employees associated with the Project as required by the State of Florida. 2. Property damage insurance for all property including vehicles owned by OWNER and operated by VWNA under this Agreement. Any property, including vehicles, not properly or fully insured shall be the financial responsibility of OWNER. OWNER's property damage insurance shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of VWNA. 3. Automobile liability insurance for collision, comprehensive, and bodily injury. Each party will cause the other party to be added as additional insured on the above insurance policies and will require its insurance carrier to provide the other party at least thirty (30) days' notice of the cancellation of such policies. VWNA may self-insure reasonable deductible amounts under the policies it is required to maintain to the extent permitted by law. Each policy shall provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the other party. Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 26 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1429 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical APPENDIX E ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services Page No. 1 16.C.8.a Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: Attachment 1 Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement - 12_12_2017 - Item 11-H - Executed (10090 : Everglade City Technical 16.C.8.b Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: Attachment 2 City Withdraws From Tech Assistance (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.b Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: Attachment 2 City Withdraws From Tech Assistance (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) PROGRESS & CLOSURE REPORT PURSUANT TO CITY OF EVERGLADES TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST Based on the City of Everglades City’s request for technical assistance on September 4, 2018, pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Technical Assistance Interlocal Agreement (the “Interlocal”) by and between the City of Everglades City, the Collier County Water-Sewer District, and the County, approved by the Board on December 12, 2017, the Collier County Public Utilities Department (“PUD”) has performed the following for the City’s water and wastewater utility systems (the “Utility System”) as follows: I. Contract Administration a. Staff worked with the City’s Mayor and attorney to finalize and terminate their existing Agreement for Operations and Maintenance Services with Veolia Water North America – South, LLC dated November 7, 2017. A copy of the Agreement with Veolia and the Notice of Default and Intent to Terminate can be accessed by clicking here. b. Staff searched for potential replacement Utility System operators and ultimately engaged U.S. Water Services Corporation for a services proposal. Due to a change in scope and hybrid approach, the proposal from U.S. Water was developed to use their resources and the City’s resources, when available, to lower the cost to less than $400,000 per year, compared to expenditures of over $1M per year with Veolia. Staff worked with the City’s Mayor and attorney to negotiate and finalize an Operations Agreement between the City of Everglades City and U.S. Water Services Corporation for Water and Wastewater Utility Operations, Maintenance, Engineering, and Management, dated September 28, 2018. A copy of the Contract with Exhibits can be accessed by clicking here. II. Capital Improvement Planning a. Staff engaged with Hole Montes for developing a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the Everglades City water and wastewater utility system. Hole Montes had previously worked on renewal of the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant and infrastructure. A Work Order under the County’s existing Contract 13-6164 for Professional Services: Architect and Engineering was issued to Hole Montes pursuant to their proposal dated December 28, 2018. A copy of the Work Order and Proposal is available here, in addition to the subsequent invoicing from Hole Montes. The Draft CIP from Hole Montes can be viewed here. 16.C.8.c Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: Attachment 3 Progress and Closure Report July 2019 (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) III. Grant Writing a. The County’s Government Affairs Manager, John D. Mullins, has worked with PUD and Everglades City to assist in drafting and finalizing the Florida Senate Local Funding Initiative and Florida House Appropriations Project Requests Forms, and continues to work with the County’s contract lobbyist to solicit sponsors for all of our project requests, including Senator Passidomo and Representative Rommel. Furthermore, the County’s Government Affairs Manager continues to monitor State legislative affairs and provide information on funding opportunities, such as the Mitigation Program administered by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) Office of Disaster Recovery, whereby the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced that the State would receive approximately $633.5M for mitigation activities in Florida communities that experienced major declared disaster events during 2016 and 2017. b. Announced on July 15, 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis awarded more than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance grants to 19 Florida communities. These grants, administered by the Florida DEO, assist communities in creating innovative planning and development strategies to promote economic diversity while protecting environmentally sensitive areas. Everglades City was awarded $40,000 to assist with the development of a comprehensive wastewater plan. A copy of the press release is available here. a. Staff engaged Angie Brewer & Associates, LC to provide funding technical assistance for Everglades City, with a primary focus to identify and apply for grants and other funding sources as well as subsequent administration/compliance management of project funding. A Purchase Order (P.O.) was issued to Angie Brewer & Associates on October 4, 2018 in the amount of $25,000. A copy of the Scope, P.O., and invoicing to date is available here. Angie Brewer continues to provide funding assistance as requested by PUD staff and as evidenced by the attached correspondence. 16.C.8.c Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: Attachment 3 Progress and Closure Report July 2019 (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1437 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.d Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: US Water Contract (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.e Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: US Water Contract Exhibits (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.e Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: US Water Contract Exhibits (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.e Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: US Water Contract Exhibits (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.e Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: US Water Contract Exhibits (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.e Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: US Water Contract Exhibits (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.f Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: Work Order to HM - Everglades City CIP (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.gPacket Pg. 1454Attachment: CIP DRAFT Cover Ltr & Summary (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.gPacket Pg. 1455Attachment: CIP DRAFT Cover Ltr & Summary (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) 16.C.8.gPacket Pg. 1456Attachment: CIP DRAFT Cover Ltr & Summary (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) From:YilmazGeorge To:HamiltonSarah Subject:Governor Ron DeSantis Announces More Than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance Grants to 19 Florida Communities Date:Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:17:28 AM From: YilmazGeorge <George.Yilmaz@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: July 15, 2019 at 5:07:12 PM EDT To: Mayor Howie Grimm <mayorgrimm@cityofeverglades.org>, Dotty Smallwood <dsmallwood@cityofeverglades.org> Cc: Zachary Lombardo <zlombardo@wpl-legal.com>, Chris Lombardo <clombardo@wpl- legal.com>, TeachScott <Scott.Teach@colliercountyfl.gov>, CasalanguidaNick <Nick.Casalanguida@colliercountyfl.gov>, OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Governor Ron DeSantis Announces More Than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance Grants to 19 Florida Communities Mayor, CONGRATULATIONS... Everglades City – ($40,000) to assist with the development of a comprehensivewastewater plan. Respectfully, George From: Governor's Press Office <Governor'sPressOffice@eog.myflorida.com> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 1:21 PM Subject: Governor Ron DeSantis Announces More Than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance Grants to 19 Florida Communities For Immediate Release July 15, 2019 Contact: Governor’s Press Office (850) 717-9282 Media@eog.myflorida.com Governor Ron DeSantis Announces More Than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance Grants to 19 Florida Communities   Tallahassee, Fla. – Today, Governor Ron DeSantis awarded more than $750,000 in Community Planning Technical Assistance grants to 19 Florida communities. These grants, administered by the Florida Department of 16.C.8.j Packet Pg. 1457 Attachment: Governor Ron DeSantis Announcement of More Than $750,000 in Grants (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Economic Opportunity (DEO), assist communities in creating innovative planning and development strategies to promote economic diversity while protecting environmentally sensitive areas. “Community planning is critical to the long-term economic success of Florida communities across the state,” said Governor DeSantis. “These technical assistance grants will help provide for the development of strong, resilient local economies that attract businesses and support a highly-trained workforce.” “Governor DeSantis’ dedication to building a stronger, more resilient Florida economy begins at the community level,” said Ken Lawson, Executive Director of DEO. “DEO will continue to guide and assist communities with every available resource to make smart strategic investments so they can achieve their planning and economic goals.” The Florida communities receiving funding include: Apalachee Regional Planning Council – ($65,450) to expand awebsite with local government maps and links to individual localgovernment websites. Calhoun County – ($40,000) to develop a long-term recovery plan tohelp with recovery from Hurricane Michael. Central Florida Regional Planning Council – ($50,000) to completethe next phase of the Heartland 2060 Regional vision plan, which is aseven-county effort to plan for a more resilient region. City of Apalachicola – ($40,000) to create a 10-year plan forcompletion of community projects required as part of the ApalachicolaBay Area of Critical State Concern statute. City of Chattahoochee – ($32,600) to support the development of aStreetscape Improvement Plan to develop a vibrant and enhancedstreetscape to help revitalize its historic downtown. City of Frostproof – ($35,000) to create a technical memorandum onhow to best expand the City’s sewage treatment plant waste disposalfacility. City of Hallandale Beach – ($40,000) to develop a Post-DisasterRedevelopment Plan to address the city’s vulnerabilities to naturalhazards. City of Springfield – ($30,000) to prepare preliminary site plans formunicipal structures lost in Hurricane Michael. City of Tamarac – ($40,000) to support the development of acomprehensive Multi-Modal Transportation Master Plan. Everglades City – ($40,000) to assist with the development of acomprehensive wastewater plan. Hernando County – ($35,000) to develop a master plan for theAnderson Snow District Park. Indian River County – ($30,000) to outline and research amanagement plan for the County’s portion of the Indian River Lagoon. 16.C.8.j Packet Pg. 1458 Attachment: Governor Ron DeSantis Announcement of More Than $750,000 in Grants (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Liberty County – ($40,000) to prepare a long-term recovery plan to helpwith recovery from Hurricane Michael. Miami Shores Village – ($40,000) to support the research anddevelopment of a Sewer Facility Plan. Monroe County – ($40,000) to update and streamline Monroe County’sland development code to comply with the “peril of flood” statute, buildcommunity-wide resilience and protect environmentally sensitive areas. Town of Havana – ($34,500) to develop Historic Mainstreet designstandards. Town of Hilliard – ($40,000) to update comprehensive plan data andanalysis, goals, objectives, policies and to digitize maps. Town of Loxahatchee Groves – ($40,000) to support the developmentof a GIS Future Land Use and Zoning Map database and to completerelated comprehensive plan amendments. Town of Orange Park – ($40,000) to develop a long-range StrategicVision Plan for the town. For more information on Community Planning Technical Assistance Grants, please click HERE. ### Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 16.C.8.j Packet Pg. 1459 Attachment: Governor Ron DeSantis Announcement of More Than $750,000 in Grants (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Collier County, FL 102-900-1201 Everglade City Funding Technical Assistance Scope of Services Angie Brewer & Associates, LC  9080 58th Drive East, Suite 200, Bradenton, Florida 34202  Phone: (941)756-5800 Page 1 of 1 Project Information Project Name Everglade City Funding Technical Assistance ABA Proposal Number 102-900-1201 Community Name Everglades City, FL Client Name Collier County, FL Application Services Funding Technical Assistance The Consultant shall provide Funding Technical Assistance for Everglades City as requested by Collier County. The primary focus of this effort will be to identify and apply for grants and other funding sources as well as subsequent administration/compliance management of project funding. Regardless of activity type, the Consultant shall not work beyond the Not to Exceed amount unless an increase is mutually agreed upon in writing. The Consultant will work with the County to establish a communication flow to ensure that all stakeholders are kept informed. It is imperative for the success of this effort that Collier County and Everglades City respond completely and timely to all information requests from the Consultant. The Consultant will make recommendations based on the best available information. It is important to note that the Consultant does not have decision making or approval authority on behalf of Collier County or Everglades City. The Consultant will be serving in a technical assistance and advisory role relating to funding at the request of Collier County. Notes 1 - All work will be billed on a time and materials basis. 2 - The County, City and/or Engineer will be required to provide requested information in a timely manner as requested. 16.C.8.k Packet Pg. 1460 Attachment: Angie Brewer Scope of Services - Everglades City (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) Purchase Order number must appear on all related correspondence, shipping papers and invoices: Printed 07/30/2019 @ 22:45:23 Page 1 of 1408-291010-634999 Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division Phone: 239-252-8407 Fax: 239-732-0844 Tax Exempt: 85-8015966531C-1 Collier County Board of County Commissioners Attn: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112-5749 OR email to: bccapclerk@collierclerk.com Send all Invoices to: VENDOR Terms and Conditions The VENDOR agrees to comply with all Purchase Order Terms and Conditions as outlined on the Collier County Procurement Services Division site: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=74077, including delivery and payment terms. Further the VENDOR agrees to: 1. Provide goods and services outlined in this Purchase Order with the prices, terms, delivery method and specifications listed above. 2. Notify department Immediately if order fulfillment cannot occur as specified. 3. Send all invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Attn: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112-5749 OR email to: bccapclerk@collierclerk.com The Purchase Order is authorized under direction of Collier County Board of County Commissioners by: Edward F. Coyman Jr, Director, Procurement Services Division Vendor # 110952 ANGIE BREWER & ASSOCIATES LC 9104 58TH DR E BRADENTON FL 34202 Purchase order PO Number 4500190035 Date 10/04/2018 Contact Person Pub Utilities Ops Please deliver to: PUBLIC UTILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3339 TAMIAMI TRL E, STE 305 NAPLES FL 34112-5361 Delivery Date: 09/30/2019 Terms of Payment Net 30 Days Item Material Description Order Qty Unit Price Per Unit Net Value 00010 CON Everglades City Funding Tech. Assist 25,000 EA 1.00 25,000.00 *** Item partially delivered *** 25,000.00Total net value excl. tax USD 16.C.8.l Packet Pg. 1461 Attachment: Angie Brewer PO 4500190035 (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) INVOICE Angie Brewer & Associates, LC 9080 58th Drive East, Suite 200 Bradenton, Florida 34202 Date: 5/14/2019 Project # 102-900-1201 Invoice#1 PO# 4500190035 Client Collier County Everglades City Public Utilities Operations Department Funding Technical Assistance 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg H, Suite 305 Naples, Florida 34112 Application Services Hours Rate Total Principal 47.75 $155.00 $7,401.25 Client Manager 33.50 $130.00 $4,355.00 Senior Program Manager $118.00 $0.00 Project Planning Manager II 55.25 $71.00 $3,922.75 Project Planning Manager I $67.00 $0.00 Senior Panning/PM Coordinator $53.00 $0.00 Planning/PM Coordinator $46.00 $0.00 Administrative Manager 24.00 $49.00 $1,176.00 Bookkeeper/Admin Assistant 16.50 $46.00 $759.00 Administrative Assistant II 13.25 $45.00 $596.25 Administrative Assistant I $35.00 $0.00 $18,210.25 Contract Amount $25,000.00 Earned to Date $18,210.25 Billed to Date $0.00 Balance $6,789.75 Amount Due $18,210.25 Please Pay This Amount $18,210.25 Angie R. Brewer 16.C.8.m Packet Pg. 1462 Attachment: Angie Brewer Invoice 1 - 05-14-19 (10090 : Everglade City Technical Assistance Interlocal Termination) PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY APPENDIX WASTEWATER SYSTEM Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 1 Em WW1 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY WW2 PROJECTS WW -01 THRU WW -09 DATA SHEETS AND COST ESTIMATES WW3 WASTEWATER SYSTEM ASSETS INVENTORY AND CONDITION WW4 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 NO. OF PAGES 1 17 3 464 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM TAB WWI CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 1 Page Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY AND PRIORITY RANK Project Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 Project Priority Year 1 Years 2-5 Ranking WW -01 JPrefabricated temporary 0.25 MGD water reclamation facility $2,960,000 59 WW -02 Construct new 0.25 MGD water reclamation facility $14,400,000 54 WW -03 Upgrade or replace 14 existing duplex pump stations $1,000,000 $2,560,000 63 WW -04 Upgrade±245 grinder pump stations $1,000,000 $1,230,000 50 WW -05 Overall SCADA for monitoring wastewater system $520,000 48 WW -06 Reuse Water System: Storage lagoon, pumping & distribution $1,350,000 35 WW -07 Allowance - Inspect, clean & repair gravity sewers $1,060,000 34 WE Chokoloskee & Plantation Island: 272 new grinder stations w/force mains $7,990,000 43 WW -09 I Chokoloshee & Plantation Island: Remove 272 septic tanks $1,240,000 43 TOTALS $4,960,000 TOTAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM NOTES: 1 The cost estimates are conceptual. $30,350,000 $35,310,000 2 CIP based on keeping existing low pressure sewer system & grinder pumps serving Everglades City and installing new low pressure sewer system for Plantation island and portions of Copeland. 3 CIP does not include upgrades necessary for entire Everglades City utility system to fully comply with Collier County Utilities Standards. New construction will comply with the County Standards. 4 The costs for the injection wells at the WRF and WTP are based on shallow injection wells. If deep injection wells are required, the cost for each facility will increase by $7M. 5 Cost estimates exclude annual maintenance and renewal costs. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM TAB WW2 Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECTS WW -01 THRU WW -09 DATA SHEETS AND COST ESTIMATES 17 Pages Prepared for Collier County CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: Justification & Documentation: Priority Matrix: 1. Install temporary prefabricated steel tanks and equipment to provide screening, biological and MBR treatment. The prefabricated tanks and equipment will replace the deteriorated structures and equipment and halt the unreliable.performance of the existing Water Reclamation Facility. The prefabricated steel tanks and new equipment will greatly accelerate the decommissioning of the existing WRF. 2. Install new prefabricated facility consisting of coarse and fine screening, biological treatment basins and MBR treatment tanks. The new facility will use the existing disinfection system and contact tank, sludge holding tank, reuse storage tank, reject storage tank, control building and standby electrical generator. The project will include new piping, pumps, electrical work and site work as required for the temporary installation and operation of the prefabricated facility. The project will also include controls, monitoring equipment and a SCADA system as required to consistently produce reuse quality effluent. (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3) FL DEP Inspection Reports of August 16 and 22, 2017 and of February 9, 2017.Tabs WW4-8, WW4- C & WW4-G (4) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017.Tab WW4-D (5) Hole Montes Preliminary Engineering Report, March 2017.Tab WW4-E (6) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (7) FL DEP letter of June 8, 2016 to Everglades City requesting Stipulation of Temporary Injunction prior to Court Hearing.Tab WW4-H (8) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (9) Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrastructure Assessment, December 5, 2015Tab WW4-M (10) FL Rural Water Association report to Everglades City and Notice of Work Stoppage, undated.Tab WW4-J (11) FI Rural Water Association letter to FL DEP, undated.Tab WW4-K (12) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Category Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: Operational Safety Risks: Immediate Reliability Concerns: Longer Term Reliability Concerns: Possible Cost Savings: (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $2,960,000 Priority Rank 59 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal Tech Memos-Report\WastewaterPmbot Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-01 Temp WRF Project Category Priority Calculated Ranking Rating Factor 5 5 25 4 2 8 3 5 15 2 5 10 1 1 1 Priority Rank 59 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal Tech Memos-Report\WastewaterPmbot Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-01 Temp WRF Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADESCITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item i Install prefabricated WRF with MBR treatment Concrete slab for prefabricated steel tanks New pumps for handling influent, sludge transfer and reuse water. Piping, valves and connections for prefab tanks and existing tanks Piping and controls for reuse water distribution Electrical & SCADA systems Site work and miscellaneous Startup and commissioning ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Cost Unit Unit Cost 1 Is $950,000 $950,000 80 cy $500 $40,000 6 ea $50,000 $300,000 1 Is $150,000 $150,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 1 Is $300,000 $300,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $2,040,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $408,000 25% Contingency $510,000 TOTAL (rounded up) $2,960,000 NOTE: Cost Estimate based on using the existing disinfection system and contact tank, sludge holding tank, reuse storage tank, reject storage tank, control building and standby electrical generator. H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\C2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\WastewaterPmject Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-O1Temp WRF Cost Est Prepared for Collier County CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Demolition and removal of existing treatment facility. Portable WRF (Project WW -01) to provide treatment during construction of this project. 2. Construct new facility consisting of equalization tank, screening and grit removal, biological treatment basins, MBR treatment basins, disinfection system, injection well, sludge holding tank, sludge dewatering system, control & electrical building, reuse storage tank, reject storage tank, electrical and SCADA systems, standby electrical generator, piping and valving and site work. 3. Startup new facility, confirm SCADA monitoring of facility, and stabilize treatment operations. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3) FL DEP Inspection Reports of August 16 and 22, 2017 and of February 9, 2017.Tabs WW4-8, WW4- C & WW4-G (4) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017.Tab WW4-D (5) Hole Montes Preliminary Engineering Report, March 2017.Tab WW4-E (6) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (7) FL DEP letter of June 8, 2016 to Everglades City requesting Stipulation of Temporary Injunction prior to Court Hearing.Tab WW4-H (8) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (9) Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrastructure Assessment, December 5, 2015Tab WW4-M (10) FL Rural Water Association report to Everglades City and Notice of Work Stoppage, undated.Tab WW4-J (11) FI Rural Water Association letter to FL DEP, undated. Tab WW4-K (12) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 5 25 Operational Safety Risks: 4 2 8 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 4 8 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 54 (Rank & Rating: 1= lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $14,400,000 11:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-02 New WRF Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ['14]L1&W Zf1111111 Ire] \I Item Demolition and removal of existing structures & piping Removal of sludge and solids from existing ponds/beds Flow equalization pumps and piping Screening, grit removal, biological treatment, disinfection, sludge holding and dewatering, yard piping MBR System Shallow injection well, piping and valves 0.25 MG Tanks for EQ, Reuse and Reject Storage Electrical & SCADA systems including standby generator Control & Electrical Building Site work Startup and commissioning ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Cost i Unit Unit Cost 1 Is $300,000 $300,000 1 Is $75,000 $75,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 250,000 gal $15 $3,750,000 250,000 gal $6 $1,500,000 1 ea $900,000 $900,000 3 ea $250,000 $750,000 1 Is $1,850,000 $1,850,000 1,000 sf $500 $500,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $9,925,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $1,985,000 25% Contingency $2,481,300 TOTAL (rounded up) $14,400,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\WastewaterPmlect Data sheets & Cost Est\W W-02 New WRF Cost Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Construct 4 new pump stations with new control panels, wetwells, pumps, piping and SCADA system. Demolish and remove existing 4 stations. 2. Install new pumps, control panel, piping and SCADA system in 10 pump stations. Repair concrete wetwells. 3. Bypass pumping system and monitoring during repairs to 14 pump stations. 4. Permanent standby generator for Chokoloskee Master Pump Station. 5. Two trailer mounted portable generators to provide emergency power to pump stations as needed. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018.Tab WW4-A (3) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017.Tab WW4-D (4) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to DEP, undated.Tab WW4-K (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County -Tab WW4-F (6) FL Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to Everglades City, undated. Tab WW4-J (7) Hole Montes report on Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (8) Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrastructure Assessment, December 5, 2015 Tab WW4-M (9) FL Rural Water Association report, Collection System Upgrade, around March 2014. Tab WW4-N (10) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 5 25 Operational Safety Risks: 4 3 12 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 5 15 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 5 10 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 63 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $3,560,000 1.\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-03 Upgrade 14 Pump Stations Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item At 10 Duplex Pump Stations: replace pumps, piping, control panel; provide SCADA system, repair concrete wetwells as needed Contruct 4 new duplex pump stations w/SCADA system Bypass pumping and monitoring -estimated 10 months Demolish & remove four existing duplex pump stations Portable trailer mounted standby generators Install permanent standby generator with belly tank and ATS at Chokoloskee Master Pump Station ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Cost Unit Unit Cost 10 ea $90,000 $900,000 4 ea $250,000 $1,000,000 300 day $1,000 $300,000 4 ea $25,000 $100,000 2 ea $20,000 $40,000 1 ea $110,000 $110,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $2,450,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $490,000 25% Contingency $612,500 TOTAL (rounded up) $3,560,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-03 Upgrade 14 Pump St. Cort Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Upgrade 231 simplex, fiberglass grinder pump stations. Each station to have new pump and control panel. Approximately 100 stations will have covers raised to reduce infiltration. 2. Upgrade 14 duplex, fiberglass grinder pump stations. Each station to have new pumps and control panel. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3)FI-Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (4) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to DEP, undated. Tab WW4-K (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County.Tab WW4-F (6) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to Everglades City, undated. Tab WW4-J (7) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (8) Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrstructure Assessment, December 5, 2015. Tab WW4-M (9) FL Rural Water Association report, Collection System Upgrade, around March 2014. Tab WW4-N (10) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-O Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: CategorV Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 2 8 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 4 8 Possible Cost Savings: 1 2 2 Priority Rank 50 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $2,230,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cort Est\W W-04 Upgrade 245 Grinder Pump Stations Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Cost Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) New pump and controller for 231 simple grinder pump 231 ea $5,800 $1,339,800 stations. New cover and riser for 100 grinder pump stations New pumps and controller for 14 duplex grinder pump stations. ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 100 ea $800 $80,000 14 ea $8,000 $112,000 $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,531,800 20% Engineering and CEI Services $306,400 25% Contingency $383,000 TOTAL (rounded up) $2,230,000 H:\2019\10190o7\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-04 Upgrade 245 Grinder Pump Sta Last Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Install fiber optic cable for transmission of multiple remote SCADA signals to/from the Water Reclamation Facility and the 14 larger duplex pump stations and the 245 grinder pump stations. SCADA signals will allow continuous monitoring of the levels and pump run times in the larger duplex stations and pump level in the grinder pump stations. SCADA signals from the WRF will include pumps and blowers on/off operation, pumps speed control, valve positions and controls for monitoring of effluent prior to reuse, tank levels, chemical pump operation, chemical levels, etc as well as maintenance planning and optimization of power consumption. 2. Connect new SCADA system to Collier County Utility operations center. 3. Develop programming for SCADA system and commence functional monitoring and control of the water system on a continuous basis. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (4) FL Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to DEP, undated. Tab WW4-K (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (6) FL Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to Everglades City, undated. Tab WW4-J (7) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (8) Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrastructure Assessment, December 5, 2015. Tab WW4-M (9) FL Rural Water Association report, Collection System Upgrade, around March 2014. Tab WW4-N (10) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 2 8 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 3 6 Possible Cost Savings: 1 2 2 Priority Rank 48 (Rank & Rating: 1= lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $520,000 Cost is based on $1,500 per pump station and $25,000 for the Water Reclamation Facility and $100,000 for connection to Collier County SCADA fiber optic network. H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-05 Wastewater SCADA System.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Install appoximately 8,000 feet of reuse water piping with valves from the new WRF throughout Everglades City for irrigation. 2. Construct effluent pumping system and controls at new WRF. 3. Install lined 0.75 MG reuse pond for storage during wet weather. Install pumping system for pond flow control. 4. Install reuse water control valve assemblies at 20 application locations. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab W3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (4) FL Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to DEP, undated. Tab WW4-K (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (6) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to Everglades City, undated. Tab WW4-J (7) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (8) FL Rural Water Association report, Collection System Upgrade, around March 2014. Tab WW4-N (9) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 3 15 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 3 9 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 3 6 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 35 (Rank & Rating: 1= lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $1,350,000 Note: Estimate excludes property and easment costs. H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-06 Wastewater Reuse Dlstrlbution System Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item Install approximately 8,000 feet of reuse water main with valves Construct lined storage lagoon at new WRF, 0.75 MG capacity New pumps and control system for flow control in/out of storage lagoon Reuse distribution pumps and controls at the new WRF Install reuse water control valve assemblies ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Note: Estimate excludes property and easment costs. Cost Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) 8,000 ea $60 $480,000 1 ea $170,000 $170,000 1 ea $100,000 $100,000 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 20 ea $4,000 $80,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $930,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $186,000 25% Contingency $232,500 TOTAL (rounded up) $1,350,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets $ Cost Est\W W-oc Wastewater Reuse Dist Sys Cost Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Video inspection of 22,000 feet of gravity sewers and manholes in Everglades City and Chokoloskee to identify locations of infiltration and deterioration. 2. Clean and flush gravity sewer. Quantity needing cleaning estimated at 50% of total sewer. 3. Repair gravity sewers as necessary to reduce inflow and infiltration. Length of gravity sewer needing repair or replacement to stop infiltration is estimated at 6,000 feet (about 25% of sewer) based on the age and maintenance of the sewer. 4. Repairs as needed for estimated quantity of 25 manholes. Justification & (1) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated Documentation: March 2019. Tab WW3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab WW4-A (3) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (4) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to DEP, undated. Tab WW4-K (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (6) FI Rural Water Association Wastewater Asset Management Plan to Everglades City, undated. Tab WW4-J (7) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (8) FL Rural Water Association report, Collection System Upgrade, around March 2014. Tab WW4-N (9) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-O Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 3 15 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 2 6 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 3 6 Possible Cost Savings: 1 3 3 Priority Rank 34 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $1,060,000 1:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submitta6Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\WW-W Inspect Gravity Sewer System Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item Video inspection and recording of gravity sewers and manholes Clean and flushing of gravity sewers Repair and replacement of gravity sewer Repair to manholes ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Cost Zuantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) 22,000 If $4 $88,000 11,000 If $12 $132,000 6,000 If $80 $480,000 25 ea $1,000 $25,000 $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $725,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $145,000 25% Contingency $181,300 TOTAL (rounded up) $1,060,000 1:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memes\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wast ,,ata,Project Data Sheets & Dust Est\W W-07lnspect GmNty Sewer Sys Cost Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Install 272 new grinder simplex pump stations in Chokoloskee and Plantation Island. Connect each residence sewer to a grinder pump station. 2. Install approximately 27,000 feet of 2, 3 and 4 -inch force mains from the grinder pump stations to the Everglades City WRF. Justification & (1) Removal of septic tanks and installation of a sewer system serving Plantation Island and Documentation: portions of Chokoloskee would reduce groundwater contamination in an environmentally sensitive area. (2) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated March 2019. Tab WW3 (3) Hole Montes Preliminary Engineering Report, March 2017. Tab WW4-E (4) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (6) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016. Tab WW4-1 (7) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab W W 4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 3 12 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 2 6 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 2 4 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 43 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $7,000,000 1:\2019\2019007\EN\G Deslgn-Reports-Tech Memcs\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\W.smevam1Pmject Data Sheets & Cast Est\W W-08 Chokoloskee-Plantation Grinder Pump Stations -Force Mains.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item New grinder pump station and controller for 272 residences. Connect residential sewer to grinder pump station Install 3 & 4 -inch force main Install 2 -inch force main ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Cost Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) 272 ea $12,500 $3,400,000 272 ea $800 $217,600 21,500 ft $45 $967,500 6,000 ft $40 $240,000 $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $4,825,100 20% Engineering and CEI Services $965,100 25% Contingency $1,206,300 TOTAL (rounded up) $7,000,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Desigu-Peparts-Tech Memos\G2 Design Sub,httal-Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cast Est\W W-08 Ch,keloskee-Plantation Pump Stations Cast BtA,x Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: Pump out 272 existing septic tanks. Removal and disposal of tank. Backfill and restore site. Justification & (1) Removal of septic tanks and installation of a sewer system serving Plantation Island and Documentation: portions of Chokoloskee would reduce groundwater contamination in an environmentally sensitive area. (2) Refer to Wastewater System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated March 2019. Tab WW3 (3) Hole Montes Preliminary Engineering Report, March 2017. Tab WW4-E (4) FL Rural Water Association Memo of May 22, 2017. Tab WW4-D (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County. Tab WW4-F (6) Hole Montes report of Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016.Tab WW4-1 (7) Tetra Tech Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010. Tab WW4-0 Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 3 12 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 2 6 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 2 4 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 43 (Rank & Rating: 1= lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $1,240,000 HA2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\WastewaterProject Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-09 Chokoloskee-Plantation Remove Septic Tanks.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Cost Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) Pump out 272 existing septic tanks. Removal and disposal 171 ea $5,000 $855,000 of tank. Backfill and restore site. ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $0 Total Estimated Construction Cost $855,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $171,000 25% Contingency $213,800 TOTAL (rounded up) $1,240,000 H:\2019\2019D07\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Wastewater-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W W-09 Chokoloskee-Plantatlon Remove Septic Tanks Cost Estalss PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM TAB WW3 WASTEWATER SYSTEM ASSETS INVENTORY AND CONDITION 3 Pages Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM ASSETS INVENTORY AND CONDITION A. Wastewater System Overview Everglades City provides wastewater services to the incorporated areas of the City and portions of unincorporated Collier County communities of Copeland, Carnestown, and Chokoloskee. The existing Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) has a DEP permit (FL0027618-005) for an annual average daily flow of 160,000 gallons per day (gpd). Everglades City has the capability to distribute 100% of the reuse water produced to the residential community. The WRF is over 40 years old and has exceeded its planned useful life. The plant and collection system are located adjacent to sensitive mangrove areas that are part of the Everglades National Park, The wastewater collection system for the Everglades City WRF serves approximately 750 residential and commercial customers. A portion of the wastewater collection system was constructed in 1991, which included approximately 245 grinder pump stations and a low-pressure force main system. The grinder pumps stations serve residences and some apartment buildings. Approximately 231 pump stations are simplex (one pump) and 14 stations are duplex (two pumps). There are several areas in Everglades City and Chokoloskee served by a gravity sewer system of approximately 22,000 lineal feet with 14 small duplex pump stations. This gravity sewer system and pump stations serve residences, condominiums, mobile home and RV parks, Everglades School, and several restaurants and commercial establishments. Eight duplex stations have fiberglass wetwells. The community of Copeland is served by a master pump station that pumps the flow approximately 15,000 feet to the Carnestown master pump station where it combines with the Carnestown community flow and is pumped approximately 23,000 feet to the plant. The Copeland and Carnestown master pump stations were upgraded in 2014, which included the addition of a standby generator at each station. The wastewater flow from Chokoloskee to the Everglades City WRF is provided by a master pump station and approximately 17,600 feet of two parallel force mains; one 4 -inch and one 6 -inch. B. Wastewater Collections System Grinder Pump Stations — Inventory and Condition Grinder pump stations fall into two categories, simplex (one pump in fiberglass sump) and duplex (two pumps in sump). Approximately 100 of the stations' covers (lids) are at or below adjacent grade. This condition allows for surface water, as well as tidal water in some areas, to enter the collection system. In addition, approximately 50 covers have been damaged, which allows surface water to enter the station. The system was installed 23 years ago, and the average pump life is 15 years, so most of the grinder pumps are at or beyond the end of their useful life and should be replaced. The local control panel for each pump station may also need replacement. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 The existing grinder pump stations are a proprietary system and replacing existing pumps with another vendor will require a major revisions or replacement of the existing grinder pump stations. The least cost alternative may be to negotiate with this manufacturer for the necessary upgrades and replacements. Low-pressure Force Main - Inventory The discharge from the grinder pump stations include approximately 16,800 feet of 1.25 -inch and 1.5 - inch force main and 9,000 feet of 2 -inch force main and 3,300 feet of 3 -inch and 4 -inch force main. These force mains from the grinder pump stations discharge directly into the 6 -inch main force main entering the WRF. Gravity ystem Pump Stations — Inventory and Condition The existing 14 lift stations need significant upgrades and repair. All 14 stations were constructed as duplex stations, yet approximately eight stations have only one pump in operation. Most of the electrical control panels appear to be below DEP required flood level. The stations' control panels should be replaced to comply with current FL DEP regulations. Four pump stations with fiberglass wetwells need to be completely replaced as the fiberglass has cracks that allow salty groundwater to enter the station. Minor modifications are required in some stations to eliminate the entrance of tidal water. Gravity ystem Pump Stations — Inventory and Condition Ground water infiltration in the gravity inlet pipes in at least three pump stations has been observed. A video inspection of the older sewer lines should be conducted to identify locations needing repair and replacement. Master Pump Stations —Condition There are three master pump stations that serve the communities of Everglades City, Chokoloskee Island, and Copeland. The Cholcoloskee Master pump station is located on the north end of Cholcoloskee Island and consists of two duplex pump stations in parallel with a total of four 7.5 hp pumps. The wet wells for both stations are made of precast concrete and appear to be in satisfactory condition. Only one 7.5 hp pump is operational leaving three pumps currently out of service. This station's wetwells have previously overflowed into the nearby waterway. There is currently no on-site generator to provide backup power to this master pump station. The Copeland master pump station has a new generator and appears to have been recently rebuilt. This master pump station in Copeland pumps flow to the Carnestown master pump station The Carnestown master pump station, located in the southwest corner of Tamiami Trail East and SR 29, serves the community of Carnestown and accepts flow from Copeland master pump station. The Carnestown master pump pumps flow directly to the WRF in Everglades City. This pump station appears to have a new generator and appears to have been recently rebuilt. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 C. Rater Reclamation Facility The WRF is over 40 years old and has exceeded its planned useful life. A Consent Order issued by the FL DEP to Everglades City in July 2018 stipulates "...complete construction of a new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility..." Previously issued DEP inspection in December 2016 and in June and August 2017 reported serious non-compliance deficiencies. Furthermore, the long term lack of maintenance and replacement at the WRF resulted in a DEP letter of March 3, 2017 that states: "The Department is working with the City to voluntarily turn over, through a current Court proceeding, the facilities and assets to a receiver.... The wastewater facility is under a Consent Order for essentially a complete rebuilding effort." Hole Montes prepared a Risk Assessment report dated April 4, 2016 for Collier County that includes the following statements: 1. The existing wastewater treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life. An entirely new treatment facility is needed. It is assumed that the effluent disposal method will be reuse of reclaimed water on residential lots, as well as along City streets, at the airport, at the School, and at parks. The effluent quality and system reliability will be limiting factors. 2. Due to the presence of adjacent environmentally sensitive areas, it is suggested that the wastewater treatment facility be designed for some degree of nitrogen removal as well as have the ability to include some degree of phosphorus removal if it is ever required by FL DEP. 3. In order to provide for the highest quality reclaimed water possible, the use of MBR technology to provide assurances of meeting TSS, turbidity, and coliform permit requirements for reuse may be the necessary standard. This type of higher cost system may also be necessary due to site space limitations. 4. The proposed wastewater treatment facility would need to include sufficient flow equalization in order to minimize facility overload during rainy season events typical of coastal communities. 5. The proposed wastewater treatment facility would include a minimum one -day volume of flow Reject Storage Tank (consider two-day reject storage tank) plus a minimum of one -day volume of flow Reuse Storage Tank (consider two-day reuse storage tank) in order to operate the facility while providing assurances of always meeting public health standards for water going to the reuse system. D. Asset Maintenance and Replacement Independent assessments by the FL DEP and by other independent parties have described insufficient maintenance and replacement actions by Everglades City. These documents also describe the lack of a preventative maintenance plan as well as maintenance records. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM TAB WW4 Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR PROJECTS 464 Pages PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM PROJECTS TABLE OF CONTENTS NO OF TAB DESCRIPTION PAGES WW4-A Consent Final Judgment Florida DEP vs Everglades City and Cover Letter from 8 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A., July 6, 2018 WW4-B Florida DEP Compliance Inspection Report, August 22, 2017 4 WW4-C Florida DEP Compliance Inspection Report, August 16, 2017 19 WW4-D Florida Rural Water Association, Memo of May 22, 2017 regarding Wastewater System 3 and meeting with Hole Montes on May 16, 2017. WW4-E Hole Montes Preliminary Engineering Report, Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 41 0.25 MGD, March, 2017 WW4-F Collier County Letter of March 20, 2017 and Florida DEP Letter of March 3, 2017 5 Regarding Everglades City Utilities WW4-G Florida DEP Compliance Inspection Report, February 9, 2017 11 WW4-H Florida DEP Letter of June 8, 2016 to Everglades City requesting 3 Stipulation of Temporary Injunction prior to scheduled Court Hearing. WW4-I Hole Montes Report on Everglades City Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing 24 to Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016 WW4-J Florida Rural Water Association, Report to Everglades City and Notice of Work Stoppage, 3 Wastewater Asset Management Plan, Undated WW4-K Florida Rural Water Association, Letter to Florida DEP, Wastewater Asset Management 6 Plan, Undated WW4-L Florida Rural Water Association, Lift Station Inspection Report, December 2015 38 WW4-M Tetra Tech, Everglades City Utility Infrastructure Assessment, December 5, 2015 5 WW4-N Florida Rural Water Association, Wastewater Collection System Report, around March 18 2014 WW4-0 Tetra Tech, Everglades City, Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010 42 WW4-P Anchor Engineering Consultants, Low Pressure Sewer System Drawings, March 2003 and 41 1999 WW4-Q Anchor Engineering Consultants, Drawings for Location of Grinder Pump Stations 1999 193 EST. 1971 CRAIG R WOODWARD Boanl Ca't f.' l: Rini MARK J. WOODWARD B.M CeniEx6 R,llicnm ANTHONY P. PIRES, JR. B.'d C"66'1: cu3D2 uneg and Lnnl Camm�cno J. CHRISTOPHERLOMBARDO B.1 C`crclfttl: Lniml and Idmily [.:nr CATHRINE A. HUNTER SARA E. HAN LEY 01 C, n"[ 1Jcnsaul h, LI mnd IVC. JENNIFER L. DEVRIES JENNIFER M. TENNEY LENORE T. 6MKEFIELD JOSEPH. A4. COLEMAN KENNETH V. MUNDY ZACHARY W. LOMEARDO ANTHONY). DIMORA L.imn�cel m F,=1011 RE PLY TO N 3200'IAM1AM1 TRAIL N. SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 219-649-6555 239-649-7342 FAX ('7 606 BALD EAGLE DRIVE SUITE 500 P.O. BOX ONE MARCO ISLAND, FL 34146 239-394-5161. 219..642-6402 FAX WWW.WPL—LEGAL.COiM WOODWA July 6, 2018 FIRES & LOM.BARDO, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Ronald W. Hoenstine, Esq. Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd, MS 35 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: File No. 15 -CA -2134 STATE OF FL DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. EVERGLADES CITY, FLORIDA Dear Mr. Hoenstine: In connection with the above referenced case, enclosed for your signature is Consent Final Judgment. Please execute and return the original to our office in the enclosed envelope provided. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Enclosure Sincerely, Lenore T. Brakefield, Esq, IN TIIE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FI 0ORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 11 -2015 -CA -002134 EVERGLADES CITY, Defendant, CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("Department'), and Defendant, Everglades City ("Defendant"), to resolve the matters at issue without [lie necessity of further litigation, have consented to the entry of this Consent Final Judgment ("Judgment"). Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Article V, Section 5, of the Florida Constitution, and sections 26.01.2, 120.69, 373.129, 403.121, 403.131, 403.141, and 403.161, Florida Statutes. 2. The Department is the administrative agency of the State of Florida having the power and duty to administer and enforce the provisions of chapters 373, 376, and 403, Florida Statutes, and the regulations promulgated thereunder in title 62, Florida Administrative Code. 3. Defendant owns and operates apublic drinking water facility located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive, Copeland, Florida. Defendant also owns and operates a domestic wastewater treatment facility located at 401 South Copeland Avenue, Everglades City, Florida (the "Facilities") Page 1 (.)f7 4. Defendant agrees to have a licensed operator (or licensed operators) operate the Facilities pursuant to Chapter 62-699, F.A.C. 5. _ Within 120 days of entry of this Judgment, Defendant: shalt complete an Asset Management Plan for the treatment portion of its Facil,itiesi, specifically the public drinking water facility located a[ 15414 Janes Scenic Drive, Copeland, Florida, and the domestic wastewater treatment facility located at 401 South, Copeland Avenue, Everglades City, Florida, shall have written procedures in place to immediately implement these plans, and shall immediately implement these plans. Within 150 days of entry of this Judgment, Defendant shall formally adopt these plans (including the implementation of sustainable rate structures) by ordinance or resolution. Each Asset Management Plan shall include': (a) Identification of all assets within the system; (b) An evaluation of the current age, condition, and anticipated useful life of each asset; (c) The current value of the assets; (d) The cost to operate and maintain all assets; (e) A capital improvement plan based on a survey of industry standards, life expectancy, life cycle analysis, and retraining useful life; (f) An analysis of funding needs; (g) An analysis of population growth and. flow projections, and a model for impact fees; commercial, industrial, and residential rate structures; and industrial pretreatment fees and parameters; (h) The establishment of an adequate funding sustainable rate structure (including consideration of loan repayments); (i) A threshold rate set to ensure the proper operation of the utility, if the Defendant transfers any of the utility proceeds to other funds, the sustainable rates must be set higher than the threshold rate to facilitate the transfer and proper operation of the utility; and (j) A plan to preserve the assets; renewal, replacement, and repair of the assets as necessary, and a risk -benefit analysis to determine the optimum renewal or replacement time. The Asset ManaPracut Plan For the collection and disposal system portions of its domestic wastewater treatment flicitity must be completed and submitted in accordance with the 245 -day [imehnme specified in Paralgraph 7, after Defendant hires an engineer within the 120 -day tinichamc specified in Para�gnph 7.. Page 2 of 7 6. Within '1,825 days after entry of this Judgment, regardless of whether public or State Revolving Fund assistance is received, Defendant shall complete construction of a new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility, and shall submit a completed DEP Form 62-620.910(12), Notification of Completion of Construction for Wastewater Facilities or Activities, expressly stating that the new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility has been completed in accordance with all applicable requirements. Ground breaking must occur within 1,460 days, All necessary Department pernut applications must be submitted and complete within 1,095 days after entry of this Judgment. Any third -party permit challenge shall temporarily toll all deadlines in this Judgment that are directly impacted by said challenge until said challenge is resolved. Defendant shall provide written quarterly progress reports to the Department regarding the status of funding, wastewater treatment facility replacement, and necessary improvements and corrective actions to the collection system and effluent disposal/reuse systems, within 10 days following the end of each calendar quarter, commencing immediately following entry of this Judgment If a compliant temporary wastewater treatment plant is made operational before the expiration of any deadlines in this paragraph, then all deadlines in this paragraph shall be extended by 730 days, 7. Defendant shall analyze the collection system and effluent disposal/reuse systems and generate a list of proposed necessary improvements to bring the collection system into full compliance with Chapter 62-604, F.A.C., and the effluent disposal/reuse system into full compliance with Chapter 62-6 L0, F.A.C., and submit those proposed necessary improvements and proposed construction and implementation schedules to the Department for approval. Once approved by the Department, Defendant shall adhere to the approved construction and implementation schedules. Any third -panty permit challenge shall temporarily toll all deadlines in Page 3 of 7 this Judgment that are directly impacted by said challenge until said challenge is resolved. Defendant shall have 120 days after entry of this Judgment to hire an engineer to generate the proposed necessary improvements and proposed construction and implementation schedules. Defendant shall then have a reasonable time, not to exceed 245 additional days, to generate the proposed construction and implementation schedules for approval by the Department. The proposed schedules shall not exceed 1,825 days from Department approval. 8. In lieu of paying stipulated penalties as contemplated by the Department's Complaint and the Consent Order between the Department and Defendant executed on April 4, 2013 (ix, OGC File No. 13-0853-t 1 -DW), the Defendant agrees to do the following: A) For a period of ten (10) years following the entry of this judgment, Defendant shall, as necessary but at least every two years, update its Facilities' Asset Management Plans, using the latest available information to improve the overall accuracy of the plans_ Jf a plan update concludes that a rate structure must be revised to continue the sustainability of proper utility operation, then the Defendant shall adopt the new sustainable rate structure by orduiance or resolution within 30 days of the plan update. S) For a period of ten (10) years following the entry of this judgment, Defendant shall, at least annually, submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report meeting all the requirements of Rule 62-600.735, Florida Administrative Code, and a Capacity Analysis Report meeting all the requirernents of Rule 62-600.405, Florida Administrative, Code. C) For a period of ten (1.0) years following the entry of this judgment, Defendant shall correct all Facilities' violations and/or deficiencies that the Department notifies the Defendant of in writing within 45 clays of such written notification or correct said violations immediately if Department determines the violations to be an imminent hazard to thepublic Page 4 of 7 health, safety, or welfare. On a case-by-case basis, the Department and Defendant are authorized to revise the 45 -day deadline if Such revision is agreed to in writing by both parties. Any such revision shall include a similar extension to the penalties imposed by paragraph 12. D) After ten (10) years, these requirements will be governed by the applicable Florida Statutes and/or Florida Administrative Code. 9. This Judgment is a settlement of the Depart:ment's civil and administrative authority arising under Florida law to resolve the matters addresses herein. This Judgment is nota settlement of any criminal liabilities which may arise under Florida law. This Judgment does not constitute settlement of any matters that are not contained in the Complaint or this Judgment, nor does it constitute settlement of any violations that may arise in the future. 10. No modifications of the terms of this Judgment shall be effective until reduced to writing, executed by both the Department and Defendant, and approved by the Court. 11. The Department hereby expressly reserves the right to initiate appropriate legal action to prevent or prohibit the future violation of applicable statutes, or the rules promulgated thereunder, that are not specifically addressed by the terms of this Judgment. 12. If the Defendant fails to comply with any paragraph of this Judgment, the Department may seek any and all judicial remedies available. Defendant agrees to pay the Department stipulated penalties in the amount Of $1,000.00 per day for each and every day that Defendant fails to timely comply with any requirements of this Judgment. 13. The transfer of the Facilities, by any means or for any reason without the consent of the Department, shall not affect or be construed to affect the Defendant's obligations under this Judgment. Page 5 of 7 14. The provisions of this Judgment are only binding upon the Department and the Defendant, and should not: be construed to affect any rights the Department may have against any other responsible parties for the violations addressed herein. 15. If any event occurs which causes delay, or the reasonable likelihood of delay, in complying with [lie requirements or deadlines of this Judgment, the Defendant shall have the burden of proving that the delay was caused by circumstances beyond Defendant's reasonable control and could not have been overcome by Defendant's due diligence. Economic circumstances shall not be considered circumstances beyond the control of the Defendant. 16. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees in this matter. 17. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terns of this Consent Final Judgment by contempt or other appropriate sanctions or remedies, and issue such other and future orders as may be appropriate, 18. The Department and the Defendant agree that Defendant's failure to comply with any terms of this Consent Final Judgment for a period exceeding 90 days shall result in an order stating that the Defendant has constructively abandoned its utility systems, which shall be deemed to act as the 60 days' notice of abandonment required by section 367.165, Florida Statutes, and shall require the appointment of a receiver for the utility systems in accordance with the timelines in section 367.165, Florida Statutes. This paragraph shall no longer be effective alter the completion of the new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility pursuant to paragraph 6. Page 6 of 7 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in Chambers in Collier County, Florida, this July, 2018. Honorable Lauren L. Brodie Circuit Judge CONSENT AND MOTION TO ENTER THIS FINAL JUDGMENT WE DO HEREBY AGREE AND CONSENT TO THE COURT'S ENTRY OF THIS day of CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT WITHOUT FURTHER HEARING IN SATISFACTION OF THE CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE COMPLAINT IN THIS CASE BETWEEN THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND EVERGLADES CITY. THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT JOINTLY MOVE THAT THE COURT ENTER THIS CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT. FSP TI 71 NJ' / y ` JJJ�III / �Ja Mayor Howell Grimm, Jr. City of Everglades City J. Christopher Lombardo, Esq. Florida Bar No. 372641 Lenore T. Brakefield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 0011083 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo,, P.A. 606 Bald Eagle Drive, Suite 500 P.O. Box One Marco Island, FL 34146 (239) 394-5161 clan bado(iPvjI Iq al.cdtai Ihrakcf rcld (2; w�l I�ga(.c_u rrl Atlorneys,for Defendant FOR TH AINTIff: -- y - .-- Jon Iglehart Director of District Management, South District, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Ronald W. IIoenstine, Esq. Florida Bar No. 31838 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard MS 35 Tallahassee, FL 32399 (850)245-2289 Ronnie W.Hoensiuu u_de t 5tate.,fl,tis Attorney for Plaintifff Page 7 of 7 August 22, 2017 Rick Scott Florida Department of Governor Environmental Protection Carlos Lopez-Cantera South District Lt. Governor Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 Noah Valenstein SouthDistrict@dep. state. A us Secretary The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Jr. The City of Everglades City PO Box 110 Everglades City, Florida 34139-110 mavorhamiltonnn aol.com Re: Inspection Reports City of Everglades City WWTP FLA027618 Collier County - DW Dear Mayor Hamilton: Reconnaissance Compliance Inspections were conducted at your facility on August 14, 2017 and August 17, 2017. During these inspections, non-compliance with the requirements of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Chapters 62-600, 62-610, and 62-620, Florida Administrative Code, was observed. The facility remains out of compliance with Consent Order No. 13 -0853 -11 -DW and Administrative Order No. AO -2016-027618. Also, the facility violated paragraph 5 of the Temporary Injunction (Case No. 11 -2015 -CA -002134) by failing to prevent an unauthorized discharge. Please see the attached inspection reports for a full account of Department observations. Please address any questions to Toni Fonseca of the South District Office at 239-344-5630 or via e-mail at Toni.Fonseca@den.state.fl.us. Sincerely, �nm r L. Carpenter Assistant District Director South District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosures: Inspection Reports (August 14, 2017 and August 17, 2017) www.de�.state.Aus Everglades City; Facility ID No.: FLA027618 Page 2 of 2 August 22, 2017 cc: Tim Stephens, plant operator (timstephens8467@gmail.com) Dottie Joyner; City Clerk (Dsmallwood&citvofeverglades.ore) McBeth Collins, City Councilman (c/o City Clerk) Howie Grimm, City Councilman (c/o City Clerk) Elaine Middlestaedt, City Councilwoman (c/o City Clerk) Parker Oglesby, City Councilman (c/o City Clerk) Johnnie Potter, City Councilman (c/o City Clerk) Lenore Brakefield, City Attorney (lbrakefield@wn1-legal.com) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WASTEWATER COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Facility Name and Physical Address WAFR ID County Entry Date Entry Time Everglades City WWTF FLA027618 Collier 8/14/2017 1`.30 PM Copeland Avenue & Kumquat St 1 ♦Permit 8/14/2017 Se 2 *Compliance Schedules Everglades City, FL 3392 Facifity Phone# Exit Date Exit Time NE 12. Groundwater (239) 695-3781 8/14/2017 2:35 PM LAT 25 51 II General Gary Maier 0 LONG 81 23 1 04 General Name(s) of Field Representatives(s) and Title Operator Certification # Email UPHI Phone Josh Stephens WWC-0018148 Timstephens8467@gmail.com (239)595-5030 Name & Address of Permittee /Designated Rep. Title Email ❑ Phone Sammy Hamilton JR Mayor mayerhaniiltoD@aol.com aol.com RS WP (239) 695-3781 PO Box 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 Inspection Type If R I I Samples Taken(Y/N): N Sample ID#: Samples Split (Y/N) Photos Taken (Y/N): Y XDomestic El Industrial FACILITY COMPLIANCE AREAS EVALUATED IC = In Compliance; MC = Minor Out of Compliance; NC = Out of Compliance; SC = Significant out of Compliance; NA= Not Applicable; NE =Not Evaluated Significant Non -Com liance Criteria Should be Reviewed when Out of Compliance Ratings Are Given in as Marked by a `Y " PERMITS/ORDERS SELF MONITORING FACILITY OPERATIONS EFFLUENDDISPOSAL Name(s) and Signatures) of Inspeetor(s) PROGRAM SC NA 3. Laboratory SC 6. Facility Site Review NE 9. ♦Effluent Quality 1 ♦Permit 8/14/2017 Se 2 *Compliance Schedules NC 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement SC 10.♦Effluent Disposal Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at a. permitted. facility. NE 5.♦Records&Reports SC 8. * Operation & Maintenance NE 11. Biosolids District Office/Phone Number NE 12. Groundwater NE 14. Other NE 1 13. ♦SSO Survey Facility and/or Order Compliance Status: ❑ In -Compliance ❑ Out-OTCompliance X Significant -Out -O£ Compliance Recommended Actions: Please Refer to Compliance Assistance Offer. Name(s) and Signatures) of Inspeetor(s) District Office/Phone Number Date Fonseca Alfredo Velantueez SD/(239)344-5630 8/14/2017 Toni General Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at a. permitted. facility. Name and Signature of Reviewer District Office/Phone Number Date General SD/(239)344-5664 8/21/2017 p 0. . •law:.,. tmd General Gary Maier 0 UNBP ❑t Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 6 Single Event Violations Check for Yes Area Description Finding Description Finding ID ® posal General Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at a. permitted. facility. EDUN ❑ ry General The laboratory is not certified by the Department of Health. LNCE ® tmd General Unauthorized discharge from the collection system with a high potential for water qualityor health impacts UNBP ❑t General The facility is operating without a wastewater permit. UPHI ❑ Reports General Falsification of any record or report FARR ❑ Reports General The Permittee failed to report noncompliance to the Department within 24 hours as required by 62-620.610(20), F.A.C. RS WP Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 6 Facility Treatment Summary: WASTEWATER TREATMENT: An existing 0.160 million gallons per day, annual average daily flow (MGD, AADF) advanced domestic wastewater treatment plant consisting of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds, filtration, chlorination, a 0.206 million gallon (MG) reject storage tank, and a 0.848 million gallon (MG) reclaimed water storage tank. REUSE OR DISPOSAL: Land Application R-01: An existing 0.115 MGD AADF permitted capacity rapid infiltration system. R-01 has two rapid infiltration basins. The total bottom area of the system is 850 square feet. R-01 is located in the northeast corner of the treatment facility's site. Land Application R-02: An existing 0.152 MGD annual average daily flow permitted capacity slow -rate public access system. R-02 is a reuse system which consists of irrigation of residential lawns, landscape areas, roadway medians, an airport, a school and a park. 1. Permit: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Current Permit available on-site? See Observation Date Permit issued March 7, 2016 Date Permit Expires March 6, 2021 Permit Renewal Application due by September 7, 2020 Administrative or Judicial Orders? Administrative Order 1.1 Deficiency: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. Corrective Action: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. 2. Compliance Schedules: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Compliance Schedule in Permit met? CW See Observation Com Schedules in Order are being 11 met? See Observation Deficiency: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and l submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. The permittee continues to be out of compliance with pa Eagyaphs 5 and 8 through 14 of Consent Order 13 -0853 -11 -DW dated Apri13, 2013. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure compliance with the Administrative Order and Consent Order. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -08/14/2017 Page 2 of 6 August 16, 2017 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@dep. state. fl. us The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Jr. The City of Everglades City PO BOX 110 Everglades City, Florida 34139-110 mavorhamiltonna.aol.com Re: Inspection Reports City of Everglades City W WTP FLA027618 Collier County - DW Dear Mayor Hamilton: Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Noah Valenstein Secretary Reconnaissance Compliance Inspections were conducted at your facility on June 08, 2017 and June 09, 2017. During these inspection, potential non-compliance was noted. Specifically, potential non-compliance with the requirements of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Chapters 62-600, 62-610 and 62-620, Florida Administrative Code, was observed. Please see the attached inspection report for a full account of Department observations. Please address any questions to Toni Fonseca of the South District Office at 239-344-5630 or via e-mail at Toni.Fonseca6 dep.state.fl.us. Sincerely, ) /I '4A;W� Jennifer L. Carpenter Assistant District Director South District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosures: Inspection Reports (June 8, 2017 and June 9, 2017) cc: Tim Stephens, operator Qimstephens8467&mail.com) www.deo.state.ti.us FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WASTEWATER COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Facility Name and Physical Address WAFR ID County Entry Date Entry Time Everglades City WWTF FLA027618 Collier 6/8/2017 2:15 pm Copeland Avenue And Kumquat St 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement NE 10. *Effluent Disposal 7/5/2017 NE Everglades City, FL 33929 Facility Phone Exit Date Exit Time NE 14. Other NE 13.4SSO Survey (239) 695-3781 6/8/2017 2:50 pm LT 25 a 51 I1 General Unauthorized discharge from the collection systemwith a high potential for water quality or health impacts LONG 81 23 04 Permit General Name(s) of Field Representatives(s)and Title Operator Certification# Email Phone Lloyd Beaty Site Representative timstephens8467@gmail.com (239)595-5030 Name & Address of Permittee / Designated Rep. Title Email Phone Sammy Hamilton SR Mayor mayorhamil-ton@aot.com (239) 695-3781 PO Box 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 -110 Inspection Type R I I Samples Taken(Y/N); N Sample lD#: Samples Split (YIN) Pictures Taken(Y/N): Y X Domestic El Industrial 6/8/2017 FACILITY COMPLIANCE AREAS EVALIJAIED IC = In Compliance; MC =Minor Out of Compliance; NC = Out of Compliance; SC = Significant out of Compliance; NA =Not Applicable; NE = Not Evaluated Significant Non -Com ]fiance Criteria Should be Reviewed when Out of Compliance Ratings Are Given in as Marked by a `Y " PERMITS/ORDERS ❑ Out -Of -Compliance SELF MONITORING FACILITY OPERATIONS EFFLUENT/DISPOSAL PROGRAM NE 1. ♦Permit NA 3. Laboratory NE 6. Facility Site Review NE 9. ♦Effluent Quality NE 2 # Compliances Schedules NE 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement NE 10. *Effluent Disposal 7/5/2017 NE 5. +Records & Reports SC 8.♦Operation &Maintenance NE 11. Biosollds Date 'L vasty. 0. . $trait NE 12. Groundwater NE 14. Other NE 13.4SSO Survey Facility and/or Order Compliance Status: ❑ m -Compliance ❑ Out -Of -Compliance X Sigrdficant-Out-Of-Compliance Recommended Actions: Please refer to the Compliance Assistance Offer. Name(s) and Signatures) of Inspector(s) District Office/Phone Number Date Narrisa Pannell. i�� _ ,'-J, _ SD/(239)344-5680 7/5/2017 Name and Signature of Reviewer District Office/Phone Number Date 'L vasty. 0. . $trait SD/(239)344-5664 8/15/2017 Gary Maier 0 The laboratory is not certified by the Department of Health LNCE Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 6 Single Event Violations Check for Yes Evaluation Arca Description Finding Description Finding ID ❑ Effluent Disposal General Operation ofunpermitted disposal system ata permitted facility. EDUN ❑ Laboratory General The laboratory is not certified by the Department of Health LNCE ® Permit General Unauthorized discharge from the collection systemwith a high potential for water quality or health impacts UNBP ❑ Permit General The facility is operating without a wastewater permit. UPHI ❑ Records and Reports General Falsification of my record or report FARR ❑ Records and Reports General The Permittee failed to report noncompliance to the Department within 24 hours as required by 62-620.610(20), F.A.C. RSWP Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 6 Facility Treatment Summary: WASTEWATER TREATMENT: An existing 0.160 million gallon per day, annual average daily flow (MGD, AADF) advanced domestic wastewater treatment plant consisting of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds, filtration, chlorination, a 0.206 million gallon (MG) reject storage tank, and a 0.848 million gallon (MG) reclaimed water storage tank. REUSE OR DISPOSAL: Land Application R-01: An existing 0.115 MGD AADF permitted capacity rapid infiltration system. R-01 has two rapid infiltration basins. The total bottom area of the system is 850 square feet. R-01 is located in the northeast comer of the treatment facility's site. Land Application R-02: An existing 0.152 MGD annual average daily flow permitted capacity slow -rate public access system. R-02 is a reuse system which consists of irrigation of residential lawns, landscape areas, roadway medians, an airport, a school and a park. 1. Permit: Not Evaluated Current Permit available on-site? See Observation Date Permit issued March 7, 2016 Date Permit Expires March 6, 2021 Permit Renewal Application due by September 7, 2020 Administrative or Judicial Orders? Administrative Order 1.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. 2. Compliance Schedules: Not Evaluated Compliance Schedule in Permit met? See Observation Compliance Schedules in Order are being met? See Observation 2.1 Observation: General —Not Evaluated. 3. Laboratory: Not Applicable Contract Lab Name and Certification # Not Applicable Sampling observed during inspection? Facility DOH Certification # Not Applicable See Observation 3.1 Observation: General—Not Applicable. 4. Sam lin : Not Evaluated Sampling conducted during inspection? See Observation Sampling observed during inspection? See Observation Sampling conducted at locations identified by thepermit? See Observation Safe access to sampling locations? See Observation 4.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. 5. Records and Reports: Not Evaluated Documents/Records reviewed Timeframe Dischar e Monitoritg Reports (DMRs) Not Evaluated 5.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 RI 06/08/17 Page 2 of 6 Please Note: A more efficient and paperless alternative to reporting discharge and groundwater monitoring data is available at hfp://www.edmr.do.state.R.us. 6. Facility Site Review: Not Evaluated 6.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. 7. Flow Measurement: Not Evaluated 8. 9. 10. Flow meter present and location as per permit? See Observation Easy access to flow meter? See Observation Date of last flow meter calibration Not Evaluated 7.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. 8.1 Deficiency Description: General — The facility was not being operated and maintained in accordance with the description in the Permit. 8.2 Deficiency Description: General— Leaks were noted in the walls/pipes of the treatment plant. Additional Comment: The leaks were observed from the reuse storage tanks. (See picture.) 8.3 Deficiency Description: General — Failure to perform maintenance resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts. 8.4 Deficiency Description: General— Failure to replace malfunctioning equipment resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-620.300(5) states that a permitted wastewater facility or activity shall not be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the terms of the permit. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure facility is operated and maintained as specified in your permit, and meets all reliability requirements in EPA MCD -05. Effluent uali : Not Evaluated DMRs review period Not Evaluated Any exceedances? See Observation 9.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. Effluent Disposal: Not Evaluated Facility discharging? See Observation Discharge location(s) as per permit? I See Observation 10.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 11. Biosolids: Not Evaluated 11.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 RI 06/08/17 Page 3 of 6 12. Groundwater Quality: Not Evaluated DMRs review period Not Evaluated Any exceedances? See Observation All monitoring wells accessible, secured & locked? See Observation 12.1 Observation: General —Not Evaluated. 13. SSO Survey: Not Evaluated Does the facility have an Operation and Not Evaluated Maintenance Manual for their collection system? Does the facility track spills in their collection Not Evaluated system? How does the facility follow up ons ills? Not Evaluated Does the facility have procedures for Not Evaluated minimizing spills? Are those procedures included in the Not Evaluated Operation and Maintenance Manual or in a separate document? How often is the manual updated? Not Evaluated 13.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 14. Other: Not Evaluated 14.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 R106/08/17 Page of Everglades City WWTF (FLA027618) Photos by Narrisa Pannell on 06/08/17 1 Untreated waste discharged from man hole 3 Untreated waste discharged from man hole I certify that these photos represent the true on-site conditions observed and have not been altered in any way. 2 Untreated waste discharged from man hole 4 Leak at seam on reuse tank Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 R106/08/17 Page 5 of 6 5. Leak at seam on reuse tank 6. Leak at seam on reuse tank 7. Leak at seam on reuse tank 9. Reuse waste being discharged to mangrove Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 RI 06/08/17 Page 6 of 6 Everglades City (FLA027618) Photos by Toni Fonseca on 06/09/2017 I certify that these photos represent the true on-site conditions observed and have not been altered in any way. 3. Large piles of debris maintain on the facility. 4. Leak at seam on reuse tank. 5. Even flow not observed clarifier (flow). 6. Even flow not observed flow). (no Everglades City (FLA027618) Photos by Toni Fonseca on 06/09/2017 I certify that these photos represent the true on-site conditions observed and have not been altered in any way. 8. Unauthorized discharge flowed to adjacent mangrove area 9. Untreated discharged from manhole 10. Leaks on equipment leads to puddles. 11. Visible sheen observed on effluent. 12. Visible sheen observed on effluent. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WASTEWATER COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Facility Name and Physical Address WAFR ID County Entry Date Entry Time Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Collier 6/92017 9:30 AM Copeland Avenue & Kumquat St Description PROGRAM Everglades City, FL 3392 Facility Phone # Exit Date Exit Time (239) 695-3781 6/92017 12:00 PM LAT 25 a 51 11 NE 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement SC 10. *Effluent Disposal LONG 81 23 04 SC 5. *Records &Reports SC 8.♦Operation &Maintenance NE 11. Biosolids Name(s) of Field Representatives(s) and Title Operator Certification # Email General Phone Tim Stephens WWA-0005472 Timstephms8467@gmail.com (239)595-5030 Name &Address ofPermitter / Designated Rep. Title Email General Phone Sammy Hamilton JR Mayor mayorhamilton@aol.com ❑ (239)695-3781 PO Box 110 Falsification of any record or report FARR Everglades. City, FL 34139 Records and Reports General Inspection Type E I R I Samples Taken(Y/N): Y Sample ID#: RQ -2017-06-19-63 Samples Split (Y/N) Photos Taken (Y/N): Y X Domestic ❑ Industrial FACILITY COMPLIANCE AREAS EVALUATED IC = In Compliance; MC =Minor Out of Compliance; NC = Out of Compliance; SC = Significant out of Compliance; NA = Not Applicable; NE = Not Evaluated Si nificant Non -Com liance. Criteria Should be Reviewed when Out of Compliance Ratings Are Given in Areas Marked b a "+" PERMITS/ORDERS Recommended Actions: Please Refer to Compliance Assistance Offer. SELF MONITORING FACILITY OPERATIONS EFFLUENT/DISPOSAL District Office/Phone Number Description PROGRAM SC NA 3. Laboratory SC 6. Facility Site Review NC 9.♦Effluent Quality I ♦Permit Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at apermitted facility. Name and Signature of Reviewer SC 2 ♦Compliance Schedules NE 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement SC 10. *Effluent Disposal SD/(239)344-5664 SC 5. *Records &Reports SC 8.♦Operation &Maintenance NE 11. Biosolids Permit General NC 12. Groundwater NE 14, Other NE 13.#SSO Survey Facility and/or Order Compliance Status: ❑ In -Compliance l.7 Out -O£ -Compliance XSignificant-Out-7Date Recommended Actions: Please Refer to Compliance Assistance Offer. Name(s) and Siguature(s) of Inspector(s) District Office/Phone Number Description Tonnii Fonseca Narrisa Pannell SD/ (239) 344-5630 IL General Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at apermitted facility. Name and Signature of Reviewer District Office/Phone Number Date it 4�-c SD/(239)344-5664 8/15/2017 Ga Maier Permit General Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 10 Single Event Violations Check for Yes Evaluation Area Description Finding Description Finding ED M Effluent Disposal General Operation ofunpermitted disposal system at apermitted facility. EDEN ❑ Laboratory General The laboratory is not certified by the Department of Health. LNCE ® Permit General Unauthorized discharge from the collection system with a high potential for water quality or health impacts UNBP ❑ Permit General The facility is operating without a wastewater permit. UPHI ❑ Records and Reports General Falsification of any record or report FARR ❑ Records and Reports General The Permittee failed to report noncompliance to the Department within 24 hours as required by 62-620.610(20), F.A.C. RSWP Version 1.13 Effective 02/17/17 Page 1 of 10 Facility Treatment Summary: WASTEWATER TREATMENT: An existing 0.160 million gallons per day, annual average daily flow (MGD, AADF) advanced domestic wastewater treatment plant consisting of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds, filtration, chlorination, a 0.206 million gallon (MG) reject storage tank, and a 0.848 million gallon (MG) reclaimed water storage tank. REUSE OR DISPOSAL: Land Application R-01: An existing 0.115 MGD AADF permitted capacity rapid infiltration system. R-01 has two rapid infiltration basins. The total bottom area of the system is 850 square feet. R-01 is located in the northeast corner of the treatment facility's site. Land Application R-02: An existing 0.152 MGD annual average daily flow permitted capacity slow -rate public access system. R-02 is a reuse system which consists of irrigation of residential lawns, landscape areas, roadway medians, an airport, a school and a park. 1. Permit: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Current Permit available on-site? See Observation Date Permit issued March 7, 2016 Date Permit Expires March 6, 2021 Permit Renewal Application due by September 7, 2020 Administrative or Judicial Orders? Administrative Order 1.1 Deficiency: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. Corrective Action: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. 2. Compliance Schedules: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Compliance Schedule in Permit met? I See Observation Compliance Schedules in Order are being met? See Observation 2.1 Deficiency: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure compliance with the Administrative Order. 3. Laboratory: Not Applicable Contract Lab Name and Certification # Not Applicable Facility DOH Certification # Not Applicable 3.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 2 of 10 4. Sampling: Not Evaluated Sampling conducted during inspection? See Observation Sampling observed during inspection? See Observation Sampling conducted at locations identified by the permit? See Observation Safe access to sampling locations? See Observation 4.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 5. Records and Reports: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance DocumentsBecords reviewed Timeframe Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) From 01/01/16 to 05/30/17 5.1 Deficiency: General — Please see specific comment Additional Comments: The permittee's facility is limited to 0.115 MGD AADF because reuse system R-02 is not operable. The permittee's DMRs indicate that the permittee may not be complying with this flow limitation. Additional Comments: Facility discharge to reuse starting in October 2016- March 2017. In the Annual re -use report for the year of 2016; facility submitted No Discharge. Monitoring Period Incorrect Reporting for following Parameters 02/01/16-02/29/16 Mo. Geo Mn and Max Fecal (facility reported "nd'; "nd" 03/01/16-03/31/16 is not a correct reporting parameter, please reference the 04/01/17-04/31/16 Instructions for Completing the Wastewater Discharge 06/01/16-06/30/16 Monitoring Report for the correct code) 08/01/16-08/31/16 09/01/16-09/31/16 10/01/16/-10/31/16 06/01/16-06/30/16 Max, Wkly Avg and Mo Avg for BOD (facility reported 07/01/16-07/31/16 "rid"; "nd" is not a correct reporting parameter, please 09/01/16-09/31/16 reference the Instructions for Completing the Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report for the correct code 09/01/16-09/31/16 Max, Wkly Avg and Mo Avg for Total Nitrogen Max, Wkly Avg and Mo Avg for Phosphorus (facility reported "nd' ; "nd" is not a correct reporting parameter; please reference the Instructions for Completing the Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report for the correct code) 11/01/16-11/30/16 Anil Avg., Mo. Geo Mn. and Max Fecal (facility reported "nd' ; 'Ind" is not a correct reporting parameter, please reference the Instructions for Completing the Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report for the correct code Monitoring Period Missing DMRs 12/01/16-12/31/16 No Report Found (Part A) 01/01/17-01/31/17 No Report Found (Part A) Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 3 of 10 5.2 Deficiency: General — The facility appears to have submitted incorrect or fraudulent data. 5.3 Deficiency: General — Discharge Monitoring Reports were not completed properly. Monitoring Period Missing Parameters Data 02/01/16-02/29/16 Annl. Avg and Mo. Avg for FLW-03 03/01/16-03/30/16 Annl. Avg, Mon Avg, Qt. Avg for FLW-01 04/01/16-04/31/16 Amd Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Permitted Capacity Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02, all parameters 06/01/16-06/30/16 Annl. Avg for FLW-03 Annl. Avg, FLW-01 Anal Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Permitted Capacity Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02, all parameters 07/01/16-07/31/16 Annl. Avg and Mo. Avg for FLW-03 Anil. Avg, FLW-01 Annl Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02, all parameters 08/01/16-08/31/16 Annl. Avg and Mo. Avg for FLW-03 09-/01/16-09/30/16 Amid. Avg, FLW-01 (PARM Code 50050 P) Anal Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02, all parameters 10/01/16/-10/31/16 Annl. Avg for FLW-03 Annl. Avg, FLW-01 (PARM Code 50050 P) Annl Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02, all parameters (facility sent reuse to land application) 11/01/16/-11/30/16 Anal. Avg and Mo. Avg for FLW-03 Annl. Avg, FLW-01 (PARM Code 50050 P) Annl Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02: FLW-02, Annl Avg. BOD, (facility sent reuse to land application) 02/01/17-02/28/17 Amd Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids Monitoring Group R-02: all parameters (facility sent reuse to land application) 03/01/17-03/31/17 Annl Avg for Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Biosolids 05/01/17-05/31/17 Amid Avg to Total Nitrogen Biosolids Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.650(5) states that the owner, manager, or operator of a domestic wastewater facility, or agent or employee thereof, shall not submit misleading, false, or inaccurate information or operational reports to the Department, either knowingly or through neglect Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 4 of 10 Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to correct each incorrect/missing parameter and missing DMRs. 5.4 Deficiency: General— Discharge monitoring reports were submitted to the Department more than 30 days late. Monitoring Period Late DMRs 01/01/16-01/31/16 60 Days 05/01/16-05/31/2016 387 Days 08/01/16-08/30/16 295 Days 03/01/17-03/31/17 61 Days 04/01/17-04/30/17 53 Days Permit/Rule or Other Reference: P.A.C. Rule 62-600.680(1) states that as required by the permit, the permittee shall submit monitoring results on Discharge Monitoring Report, Form 62-620.910(10), F.A.C., in accordance with subsection 62-620.610(18), F.A.C., as follows: (a) Discharge Monitoring Reports shall be mailed to the Department at the address specified in the permit or electronically submitted using the Department's Business Portal at http://www.fldcpportal.com/go/. Reports shall be submitted in accordance with the frequencies specified on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms attached to the wastewater permit and be postmarked or entered electronically by the 28th day of the month following the month of operation; and, (b) Discharge Monitoring Reports shall be submitted for each required monitoring period including periods of no discharge. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure the facility submit DMRs by the 28' of each month. 6. Facility Site Review: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance 6.1 Deficiency: General — The facility grounds were not properly secured. Additional Comments: Facility access gates were locked but there is a large gap between the gate pole and tree bushes which allows easy access. 6.2 Deficiency: General — The facility grounds were not clean or well maintained. Additional Comments: Large piles of debris were present around the treatment facility ground. 6.3 Deficiency: Backflow Prevention — A reduced pressure zone backflow prevention device was not present on the potable water supply line. Additional Comments: Facility does not have records of backflow prevention testing. 6.4 Deficiency: Alternate Power—An alternative power source is not available at the WWTF. Additional Comments: The on-site generator is not functional. 6.5 Deficiency: Aeration Basins/Act. Sludge - The aeration basins were not providing adequate mixing. Several dead spots were observed in the basins. Additional Comments: Dead spots observed in basins. 6.6 Deficiency: Clarifiers — The clarifier weirs do not appear to be level. Additional Comments: Flow was not even going over the weir Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(3) states that all facilities and equipment necessary for the treatment, reuse, and disposal of domestic wastewater and biosolids shall be maintained, at a minimum, so as to function as intended. Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 5 of 10 Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure the facility and equipment necessary for treatment is being maintained to function as intended. 7. Flow Measurement: Not Evaluated Flow meter present and location as per permit? See Observation Easy access to flow meter? See Observation Date of last flow meter calibration See Observation 7.1 Observation: General —Not Evaluated. 8. Operation and Maintenance: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Facility being operated as per permit? I No I 8.1 Deficiency: General — The facility was not being operated and maintained in accordance with the description in the Permit. Additional Comments: Facility has been discharging reuse water to the environment since October 2016. 8.2 Deficiency: General — The facility was operating in a manner that resulted in a high potential for water quality violations. 8.3 Deficiency: General — The facility failed to perform maintenance, which resulted in a high potential for water quality or health impacts. 8.4 Deficiency: General — The facility failed to replace malfunctioning equipment, which resulted in a high potential for water quality or health impacts. 8.5 Deficiency: General— Leaks were noted in the walls/pipes of the treatment plant. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: P.A.C. Rule 62-620.300(5) states that a permitted wastewater facility or activity shall not be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the terms of the permit. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure facility is operating according to the permit. 9. Effluent Quality: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance DMRs review periodFrom01/01/16 to 05/31/17 Any exceedances? I Yes Monitoring Period Exceedance Limit Amount 02/01/16-02/29/16 TSS — 84.9 Max — 5.0 Mo Avg. P = 5.5 Max = 1.25 Max Wkly Avg. P = 2.75 Max = 1.5 Max P=7.0 Max =2.0 03/01/16-03/31/16 TSS = 191 Max= 5.0 Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 6 of 10 10. Effluent Disposal: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Facility discharging? Yes Discharge location(s) as per permit? No 10.1 Observation: General -The facility was discharging at the time of the inspection. 10.2 Deficiency: General - The effluent had a visible sheen at the time of the inspection Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(1) states that all domestic wastewater facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the applicable provisions of this chapter and related regulations so as Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 7 of 10 Mo Avg. P = 2.93 Max = 1.25 Max P = 3.87 Max = 2.0 04/01/16-04/30/16 TSS =124 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 10.56 Max = 3.75 Max Wkly Avg. N = 5.25 Max = 4.5 MaxN=21.0 Max =6.6 05/01/16-05/31/16 TSS = 91 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 11.5 Max - 3.75 Max Wkly Avg. N = 5.8 Max - 4.5 Max N - 14.8 Max = 6.0 Mo Avg. P - 2.87 Max = 1.25 Max P=5.31 Max =2.0 06/01/16-06/30/16 TSS -17.4 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 8.28 Max =3.75 Max N=15.6 Max =6.0 07/01/16-07/31/16 TSS -17.4 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 4.68 Max =3.75 Max N=9.37 Max =6.0 08/01/16-08/31/16 TSS =17.4 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 7.80 Max --3.75 Max N - 8.03 Max - 6.0 10/01/16-10/31/16 TSS =12.1 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 4.33 Max=3.75 02/01/17-02/28/17 TSS =255 Max =5.0 Mo Avg. P = 1.58 Max = 1.25 Max P - 3.06 Max = 2.0 03/01/17-03/31/17 TSS - 61.4 Max = 5.0 Mo Avg. N = 6.6 Max = 3.75 Max N=12.5 Max =6.0 04/01/17-04/30/17 TSS =29.0 Max =5.0 Mo Avg. N = 15.5 Max = 3.75 Max Wkly Avg. N = 7.7 Max - 4.5 Max N=31.0 Max =6.0 05/01/17-05/31/17 TSS =28.7 Max =5.0 Mo Avg. N - 30.2 Max = 3.75 Max Wkly Avg. N = 7.6 Max = 4.5 Max N=30.4 Max =6.0 10. Effluent Disposal: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Facility discharging? Yes Discharge location(s) as per permit? No 10.1 Observation: General -The facility was discharging at the time of the inspection. 10.2 Deficiency: General - The effluent had a visible sheen at the time of the inspection Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(1) states that all domestic wastewater facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the applicable provisions of this chapter and related regulations so as Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 7 of 10 to attain, at a minimum, the reclaimed water or effluent quality required by the wastewater facility permit Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure facility maintains effluent quality as required by the permit. 10.3 Deficiency: General — Failure to operate disposal system as designed with a high potential for water quality or health impacts Additional Comments: Discharge observed from reuse storage tank to mangrove area. At the time of the inspection, the reuse storage tank was full to capacity. The reject storage tank was empty 10.4 Deficiency: General — An unauthorized discharge to waters of the state was observed during the inspection. Additional Comments: Water from mangrove area appears to flow into the Lake Placid Canal. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-620.300(5) states that a permitted wastewater facility or activity shall not be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the terms of the permit. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure facility discharge effluent at location(s) authorized in permit. 11. Biosolids: Not Evaluated 11.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. 12. Groundwater Quality: Out -of -Compliance DMRs review period From 01/01/14 to 03/31/17 Any exceedances? No All monitoring wells accessible, secured & locked? See Observation 12.1 Deficiency: General — A review of the ground water monitoring reports revealed that dry conditions prevented samples from being collected. Additional Comments: Samples collected on 09/20/16 and 02/06/2017 for Compliance Well MWC-30983 purged dry. 12.2 Deficiency: General — Ground water monitoring results were not submitted to the Department in a timely manner. Additional Comments: The following groundwater DMRs were not reported to the Denartment. Monitoring Period Missing DMRs 04/01/14-06/30/14 No Report Found 07/01/14-09/31/14 No Report Found 10/01/14-12/31/14 No Report Found 01/01/15-03/31/15 No Report Found 04/01/15-06/30/15 No Report Found Everglades City W WTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 8 of 10 07/01/15-09/31/15 No Report Found 10/01/15-12/31/15 No Report Found Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.670(1) states that wastewater treatment facilities which are designed so that some or all of the reclaimed water or effluent may enter ground waters shall conduct ground water monitoring in accordance with Chapter 62-520, F.A.C., and this chapter. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to submit missing DMRs. Also, please evaluated groundwater monitoring plan to ensure that all wells can be sample especially compliance well. Additional Comments: The following groundwater DMRs were submitted late to the Department. Monitoring Period Late DMRs 01/01/17-03/31/17 83 Days Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.680(1) states that as required by the permit, the permittee shall submit monitoring results on Discharge Monitoring Report, Form 62-620.910(10), F.A.C., in accordance with subsection 62-620.610(18), F.A.C., as follows: (a) Discharge Monitoring Reports shall be mailed to the Department at the address specified in the permit or electronically submitted using the Department's Business Portal at http://www.fldepportal.com/go/. Reports shall be submitted in accordance with the frequencies specified on the Discharge Monitoring Report forms attached to the wastewater permit and be postmarked or entered electronically by the 28th day of the month following the month of operation; and, (b) Discharge Monitoring Reports shall be submitted for each required monitoring period including periods of no discharge. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure the facility groundwater DMRs are submitted to the Department by the 28' of each reporting quarter. 13. SSO Survey: Not Evaluated Does the facility have an Operation and Not Evaluated Maintenance Manual for their collection system? Does the facility track spills in their collection Not Evaluated system? How does the facility follow up ons ills? Not Evaluated Does the facility have procedures for Not Evaluated minimizing spills? Are those procedures included in the Not Evaluated Operation and Maintenance Manual or in a separate document? How often is the manual updated? Not Evaluated 13.1 Observation: General—Please see specific comment Additional Comments: Not Evaluated. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 9 of 10 14. Other: Not Evaluated 144.1 Observation: General—Not Evaluated. Everglades City WWTF Collier County FLA027618 ERI -06/09/2017 Page 10 of 10 FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 2970 Wellington Circle • Tallahassee, FL 32309-6885 Telephone: 850-668-2746 - Fax: 850-893-4581 MEMORANDUM Mr. Gary Williams, FRWA Executive Director Mr. Bill Archebelle, P.E., FRWA UAM Mr. Sterling Carroll, P.E., FRWA State Engineer To: Honorable Mayor Sammy Hamilton, Everglades City Mr. Tim Banks, FDEP CWSRF Program Administrator j Dr. Ronald E. Benson, Jr., P.E., Hole Montes VP/Principal Ms. Dawn Barnard, Hole Montes Project Manager From: Jason D. Sparks, P.E., FRWA UAM .._ - ---. ......... Date: May22, 2017 i Subject: Everglades City Wastewater System May 16, 2017 FRWA & Hole Montes Meeting Summary Florida Rural Water Association is devising Wastewater System (WWS) and Drinking Water System (DWS) Fiscal Sustainability and Asset Management Plan for The City of Everglades City WA/VW Systems. This meeting focused mainly on the WWS and brief DWS discussion. Everglades City WWS Status ➢ Hole Montes (HM) retained as City consulting engineer mid-October 2016. ➢ Shortly thereafter, Mr. Jon Iglehart, FDEP South District Director met with Everglades City, HM and teleconferenced Mr. Banks. ➢ Everglades City WWS Improvements Initial Phase: o Submit CWSRF application by end of December 2016, primarily focused on WWCS/PS improvements (Design/Bid in 3-4 months) • 5 contracts: Individual grinder pumps at various locations • Master WWPS group • Duplex & smaller WWPS group • Chokoloskee Duplex & smaller WWPS group • Purchasing -- Equipment o WWPS Pumps o Individual grinder PS E -One grinder pumps and associated appurtenances ➢ Everglades City WWS Improvements Second Phase: o WWRF CWSRF application immediately on completion of CWSRF WWCS Improvements Phase One. • Encompass WWRF treatment, reuse, and disposal and WWCS/PS items remaining/discovered. • Reuse T/D System R&R (airport, residential landscape irrigation, etc.) Existing FDEP WWRF operating permit requires: AWT 5, 5, 3, 1 i 100% effluent reuse disposal • Existing Everglades City WW Facility plan outlined in existing permit (reflecting Bardenpho and ring steel WWRF construction) approved for use by HM. ➢ HM worked diligently to meet December 23 WWCS Improvements CWSRF application submittal deadline. ➢ FDEP South District accelerated proposed Everglades City WWRF permit application review. ➢ March 20, 2017: Mr. Inglehart email ref $1.8M WWCS CWSRF funding approved. ➢ April 1, 2017: Mr. Inglehart email ref receiving comments from Mr. John Sowerby, P.E. associated with $1.8M WWCS CWSRF funding..... primary request to submit a "Cost and Effectiveness Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Options for Everglades City" ➢ WWCS improvements and WWRF design halted. ➢ HM effort shifted to cost and effectiveness comparison report. ➢ May 16, 2017: HM submitted comparison report to FDEP/FRWA/City for review and comment. ➢ Report evaluates and compares three alternatives: 1. Existing WWTF precast concrete process treatment component improvements 2. Existing WWTF steel process treatment component (leased) improvements 3. Connect to Collier County Seminole State Park WWPS via proposed City WWPS & 8 -inch FM improvements ➢ FRWA to review and comment on comparison report and provide feedback to HM ASAP. ➢ City currently paying WWTF "observer" to open/close valve when needed (24/7). ➢ Discussion ref privatizing WWS & DWS operations and cost vs. Collier County cost 1. Will FDEP spring for costs associated with WWS improvements and compensate Collier County for oversight? OR 2. Will FDEP cover privatizing WWS & DWS operations cost until EC rates adjusted to sustain proper WWS&DWS operations? FRWA can perform rate study; help with CIPP budget and financials. 3. Estimate tens of millions of dollars invested for Collier County to accept system O&M. 4. Estimate $300k to $400K annually for private O&M. 5. Maybe Senate appropriations? ➢ Mr. Leo J. Salvatori tendered resignation as City Attorney. Hole Montes recommended an attorney well versed in utility law. The Honorable Mayor Sammy Hamilton was in the Collier County Courthouse today May 16 appearing before the Judge to introduce new City attorney. ➢ Bill Archebelle and Jason Sparks collaboration to finish FRWA WWS FSAMP Draft Everglades City DWS Improvements — See Pictures ➢ Pressure Booster Station o New 300 gpm HSP2 and 30 Hp motor 2 o HSP 1 and motor 1 Renewal o HSP 1 & 2 Yaskawa P1000 VFDs o HSP 1 & 2 discharge piping pressure transducers o HSP 1 & 2 discharge piping pressure gauges o Discharge piping improvements and pipe support installation at multiple locations ➢ WTP o Transfer pump 2 and motor 2 rehabilitated The City of Everglades City Reclaim Water Production Facility PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPOR'l' for EXPANSION 'TO 0.25 .MGD (Based on Maximum Month Average Daily Plow) Facility Identification Number FLA027618 Permit Expiration Date March 6, 2021 MARCH 2017 HOLE MONTES, INC. 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 341.10 (239)254-2000 Florida Certificate of Authorization No, 1772 Ronald E. Benson, Jr., Plr.11_, P.E. Florida Professional FtigineerNo.: Signature /8 Date O & i�GEN O e _ No.39926 o.' STATE OF N FSS/ NAI �cC° Executive Summary The following report outlines the proposed expansion of the City of Everglades City Reclaimed Water Production Facility from the current permitted capacity of 0.16 MGD Max Month Daily Flow to the proposed permitted limit of 0.25 MGD Max Month Daily Flow. The purpose of the Preliminary Engineering Report is to obtain a new permitted capacity for the facility, leading to a permit for the proposed expansion work to be completed. The City of Everglades City authorized Hole Montes, Inc. to prepare the necessary documents to acquire a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit to expand their facility. The proposed expansion involves construction planning broken down into two distinct phases. The expansion will include, but is not limited to, the construction of new biological treatment basins, new clarifiers, new flow equalization tank, new chlorine contact basins and new drum screens. The sequence of construction will be conducted in such a way as to prioritize the rehabilitation of the reuse water production system making reuse quality reclaimed water available for the City of Everglades City. Table of Contents 1, Executive Summary........................................................................... ii 2. List of Tables.................................................................................. iv 3. List of figures................................................................................. iv 4. Location and Service Area. .................................................................. l 5. Design Flow and Influent Characteristics ....... ................................ I......... 4 6. Existing Conditions........................................................................... 11 7. Alternatives....................................................................................13 8. Selected Alternative (Phasing)............................................................. 22 9. Design Criteria............................................................................... 22 10. Process Design Summary................................................................... 23 11. Design Capacity............................................................................. 24 12, Class I Reliability......:.......................................................................29 13. Five-stage Bardenpho Process Design Summary....................................... 29 List of Tables 1. Table 1: Population Considerations....................................................... 5 2, Table 2: Influent Contribution per Person ................................................ 5 3, Table 3: Present Flows..................................................................... 6 4. Table 4: Present Influent Loadings....................................................... 6 5. Table 5: Future Flows..................................................................... 7 6. Table 6: Future Influent Loadings....................................................... 8 7. Table 7: Build Out Flows.................................................................. 8 8. Table 8: Build Out Influent Loadings ................................................... 9 9. Table 9: Design Criteria Peak Flow (Rain Event) ...................................... 22 10. Table 10: Design Criteria Peak (Tourist Season) ...................................... 22 11. Table 11: Process Design Summary ...................................................... 23 12. Table 12: Process Design Limitations.................................................... 23 13. Table 13: Class I Reliability................................................................. 29 List of Figures 1. Figure 1: Everglades City WWTP Service Area ......................................... 1 2. Figure 2: Copeland, Florida............................................................... 2 3, Figure 3: Everglades City, Florida......................................................... 3 4. Figure 4: Chokoloskee Island, Florida ..................................................... 4 5. Figure 5: Rainfall & Plant Influent Flow .................................................. 10 6. Figure 6: Plant Influent Flow............................................................... 11 7. Figure 7: Existing Process Flow Diagram ................................................. 12 8. Figure 8: Plant Site Demolition............................................................ 14 9. Figure 9: Proposed Process Flow Schematic ... .......................................... 15 10. Figure 10: Alternative 1......................................................................16 11. Figure 11: Alternative 2...................................................................... 17 12, Figure 12: Alternative 3..................................................................... 18 13. Figure 13: Alternative 4..................................................................... 19 14. Figure 14: Alternative 5 (Selected).........................................................20 15. Figure 15: Proposed Plant Site............................................................. 21 iv Location and Service Area The Everglades City Reclaim Water Production Facility (RWPF) is located in Collier County Florida, in the City of Everglades City. The service area served by the facility includes the City of Everglades City, Chokoloskee Island, and Copeland. An overall view of the service area can be seen in Figure 1. "These three areas contribute the influent flows to the wastewater treatment plant in Everglades City. Refer to Figures 2, 3 and 4. Desi o Fl9w and Influent Characteristics ]nfluent characteristics of the flows entering the wastewater treatment plant were estimated for present, future, and build out conditions for the existing and likely future service areas. ,Present and fixture population estimates were established based upon the lumber of existing dwelling units in the service area. Build out population estimates were based upon all dwelling units being occupied and all vacant lots occupied, including extending sanitary sewer service to areas currently using septic tanks (Plantation and Cholcoloshee). Influent flows entering the wastewater plant were evaluated for flows observed from permanent residents during the rainy season as well as for ,flows observed during the dry season when the tourist population is present. hniluent wastewater characteristics entering the plant were evaluated based upon estimates of inflow and infiltration contributing to the wastewater ,Plow as well as concentrate from the City of Everglades City Water Treatment ,Plant_ Present estimates of contributions of concentrate water to the wastewater stream vary from 25,000 gpd to 50,000 gpol. Mass (loading pounds per day) of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3), and Total Phosphorus (TP) were calculated as well as the concentration of these constituents in mg/L entering the plant. The above constituents were calculated for present, future, and build out scenarios. Refer to Tables 1 through 4 for current wet season conditions as well as current tourist season conditions. Table 1 —Population Considerations* Population *Population equivalent based on number of housing units in Copeland, Everglades City and Chokoloskee Table 2 — Influent Contribution per Person Constituent Permanent Residents/Rainy Season 800 Present Population = 204 Present Tourist/Dry Season 1600 NH3 . Population= 36 Future Permanent Residents/Rainy Season 1000 Population = Future Tourist/Dry Season 2000 Population = Build out Permanent Residents/Rainy Season 1500 Population = Build out Tourist/Dry Season 3000 Population = *Population equivalent based on number of housing units in Copeland, Everglades City and Chokoloskee Table 2 — Influent Contribution per Person Constituent lb/capita-d Concentration (mg/L) @ 100 gal/capita-day BOD 0.17 204 TSS 0.2 240 NH3 0.03 36 TP 0.004 5 1 Rony Joel, A., P.E. 2016, City of Everglades City Capacity Analysis Report Reclaim Water Production Facility Table 3 — Present Flows Permanent Residents/ Tourist/ Rainv Season Dry Season Present Total gallons of flow contributed 80,000 Constituent from Permanent Resident Population Concentration (mg/L) 255,000 (Pop. Flow+UI +concentrate Flow) Present Total gallons of flow contributed 136 160,000 from Tourist Season Population 160 75 Present Total gallons of flow generated by 24 11 I/I per day (permanent residents / rainy 150,000 2 season) Total gallons generated per day Constituent Present Total gallons of flow(concentrate) Concentration (mg/L) 210,000 (Pop. Flow +concentrate Flow) generated by Copeland WTP per 25,000 155 day(permanent residents / rainy season) 320 183 Present Total gallons of flow (concentrate) 48 27 generated by Copeland WTP per day - 50,000 (tourist/dry season) Total Flow 255,000 210,000 *Based upon (100gal/capita-day) Table 4 — Present Influent Loadings Present Population and Loadings Entering WW Plant (Permanent Residents/Rainy Season) Total gallons generated per day Constituent lb produced/day Concentration (mg/L) 255,000 (Pop. Flow+UI +concentrate Flow) BOD 136 64 TSS 160 75 NHa 24 11 TP 3.2 2 Present Flow and Loadings Entering WW Plant (Tourist/Dry Season) Total gallons generated per day Constituent lb produced/day Concentration (mg/L) 210,000 (Pop. Flow +concentrate Flow) BOD 272 155 TSS 320 183 NH3 48 27 TP 6.4 4 In addition, the future flows were estimated based on the assumption of a reduction in infiltration/inflow, average water contribution per resident and typical organic solids, nitrogen and phosphorus contributions per person. Two extremes were considered, rainy season (low population) and dry season (peals tourist population). The City of Everglades City is host to several multi -day events held during peak tourist season. Refer to Tables 5 through 8 below. Table 5 — Future Flows Permanent Residents/ Tourist/ Rainy Season Dry Season Future Total gallons of flow contributed 100,000 - from Permanent Resident Population Future Total gallons of flow contributed _ 200,000 from Tourist Season Population Future Total gallons of flow generated by I/I per day (permanent residents / rainy 75,000 season) Future Total gallons of flow(concentrate) generated by Copeland WTP per 32,000 day(permanent residents / rainy season) Future Total gallons of flow (concentrate) generated by Copeland WTP per day - 64,000 (tourist/dry season) Total Flow 207,000 264,000 *Based upon (I OOgalkapita-day) Table 6 — Future Influent Loadings Future Population and Loadings Entering Wastewater Plant Permanent Residents/Rainy Season) Total gallons (generated per day) Constituent lb produced/day Concentration (mg/L) 207,000 (Pop. Flow AA +concentrate Flow) BOD 170 98 TSS 200 116 NH3 30 17 TP 4 2 Future Flow and Loadings Entering Wastewater Plant (Tourist/Dry Season) Total gallons (generated per day) Constituent :1bpr:odu:cecdl&V/da:ayrConcentratioTni (mg/L) 264,000 (Pop. Flow +concentrate Flow) BOD 340 154 TSS 400 182 NH3 60 27 TP 8 4 Table 7 — Build Out Flows Permanent Residents/ Tourist/ Rainy Season Dry Season (gallons) (gallons) Flow contributed from permanent resident population 150,000 - Flow contributed from tourist season population - 300,000 Flow generated by I/I per day (permanent residents / rainy season) 75,000 Flow(concentrate) generated by WTP per day(permanent residents / rainy season) 50,000 - Flow (concentrate) generated by WTP per day (tourist/dry season) _ 100,000 Total Flow 275,000 400,000 *Based upon (I00galkapita-day) Table 8 — Build Out Influent Loadings Build Out flow and Loadings Entering WW Plant (Permanent Residents/Rainy Season) Total gallons (generated per day) Constituent Ib. produced/day Concentration (mg/L) 275,000 (Pop. Flow +Ul+concentrate Flow) BOD 255 111 TSS 300 131 NH3 45 20 TP 6 3 Build Out Flow and Loadings Entering WW Plant (Tourist Dry Season) Total gallons (generated by population per day) Constituent lb, produced/day Concentration (mg/L) 400,000 (Pop. Flow+concentrate Flow) BOD 510 153 TSS 600 180 NH3 90 27 TP 12 4 Inflow and infiltration estimates for the proposed Reclaim Water Production Facility expansion were formulated using limited flow data provided by the plant's operations staff. Data was limited due to a faulty flowmeter, which was replaced in August of 2016. An estimate of infiltration and inflow was achieved by analyzing rainfall and influent flow data over a limited number of days between August and September of 2016. A graphical representation of the plant influent flow data and accumulated rainfall can be seen in Figure 5 below. Ir'u " —, —... Influent flows (corrected to remove concentrate from water treatment plant) are provided in Figure 6 below for the period December 2016 and January 2017, and generally ranged from 75,000 to 150,000 gpd. It should be noted that this period does not include peak tourist season flow conditions; therefore, it appears reasonable to use a peak tourist season flow of 160,000 glad. Figure 6: Plant Influent Flow A design ,flow for maximum daily flaw of 400,000 gpd was used for the rainy season based on the flow data provided by operations staff for a rainfall event in late August/early September 2016. Interpretation of the data provided in the graph over the time period from late August to early September yielded an average inflow/infiltration of approximately 148,000 gallons per inch of rainfall over a three to four day period. Existing Conditions The Existing Process Flow Diagram for the plant can be seen in Figure 7. Thu proposed rehabilitation and upgrade of the City of Everglades City's Reclaim Water Production Facility will require the demolition of various treatment processes structures that are in porn: condition and will require replacement. The portions of the existing plant that will be demolished include: one of the two sludge digesters, the sludge decarifteaeration tank, the biological treatment basins, the effluent filters, the clarifiers, and finally a concrete slab and buildings used for onsite storage. This project may require the relocation of an existing overhead power line. The existing structures on the plant site which can be utilized during the plant upgrade include: the reuse water storage tank and reject water storage tank, the operations building, the blower building, the flow equalization tank, one sludge digester, the sludge drying beds and the rapid infiltration basins. A drawing of the existing conditions, depicting which structures will remain and which structures will be replaced can be found in Figure 8 Plant Site Demolition Plan. Alternatives Proposed alternatives for expansion of the City of Everglades City Reclaim Water Production Facility include: 1. Ring -Steel Package Plant 2. Rectangular Tank Package Plant w/ circular clarifiers 3. Concrete (precast) biological treatment basins with 13 feet side water depth w/ circular clarifiers 4. Concrete (precast) biological treatment basins with 18 feet side water depth w/ circular clarifiers 5. Concrete (precast) biological treatment basins with 18 feet side water depth w/ rectangular clarifiers See Figures 9 through 15 below for the proposed alternatives, with phasing and future build out options. When evaluating the best option for the proposed plant expansion, construction phasing and prioritizing the rehabilitation of the reuse water distribution system were considered. Currently the plant is not meeting reuse water quality criteria for distribution of reclaimed water to the service area customers. As a result, all effluent is currently being discharged to the two onsite rapid infiltration basins. As the capacity of these rapid infiltration basins is limited, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has required the City to (1) provide 24 In/day — 7 days/week plant monitoring and (2) hauling of excess effluent for off-site disposal. This is very costly and doesn't address the underlying problem. Therefore, it is proposed that this project be phased to remedy the underlying problem (failure to produce reuse quality water and subsequent beneficial reuse water to reduce volume of effluent going to the rapid infiltration basins). As seen in the alternative exhibits, a Ring -Steel package plant footprint would fit on the plant site, but choosing this alternative would not allow for expedient rehabilitation of the reuse water treatment system. The ring steel package plant would not allow for a new clarifier, effluent filters, and chlorine contact chambers to be constructed first, allowing for treated effluent to meet reuse quality standards independent of the rest of the project. The footprint of a rectangular tank package plant would also fit on the treatment plant site but its useful life would be less than the precast concrete biological treatment options. The existing steel tanks on this site have extensive corrosion. This is a sign of what may happen if steel structures are relied upon extensively. 13 LLGLKID - I d 0 € V J¢ 44 wt r. " I flEC011b PflRWINO ty T _'1 [lY�Ox'.. "P. —rc I AN ilkT 1. ADVANCED E aloe rine Qo n t SIT c SCHEMATIC E - ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - ----- - PIPING PLAN PHASE 3 -EVERGLADES CITY a• DIAMETER ANo LAgGEH C -7C /E Z. I.iH M NT6 wv rr. rrz '::.. na wrrrre T F[rFnc Esmr�or ..... VI..IIF.f'tl e ax eve sF. S LL ___ ,,.eav amn r______________ —_____ t I I **I T� aIOLOCIaL TREATAENi s[coxoARr e0 bTAry ruMr cL SiATUN PV MP STAT ON AURERS (z) DRUM SCREENS (2) EO bANN BIOLOGICAL' I GEAT-ENT (2) VALVE TABLE VALVE NUMBER PURPOSE NORMAL POSITION � amour 2 UMN 4 5 6 mow ¢aem B 4 CNLORINE CONTACT REUSE SigUCE BAMN5 (A) TANK EFFLUENT FILTERS (z) EFFLUENT TRANSFER PUMP STATION 7 A REUSE CUSTOMERS GN -.UA RAPID8 INFILTRATOR EASING B A REVUE PUMP I REJECT PUMP UiAiON RTAIISN ".: 'f o RAW N.Ml IINl. ? ' i I A � t { nauM3'LINN AE¢xs $Ll)P9e U'RPI BFO t " [ MG Ow -` Kp1v { '�'` 9FB4yGN�- � C 'v MMA P PIANO'"` CL/JVII IEH k . '� �. � 4.••• I ••. •• .,� � PNPP 5L '. (' R o ocicAL Rt { kERjIFOAFo4}3SIE1p}l dG To. AGNAFMIEErtUR L � } _ PH8b�11 j-; _ Y O) i �PROPUTO ROK'POffip- .,6 _ pO4A41ENION RIpjBE'�YyAN�jW{ X N litvA L t1 '= 3`. F' S "SLVPGE GRtlHG Bk0 e'{ 0.1000'_- ; y' Ms PROME.t'= m 4wEnuF i 'Aow 'PnclmnSO $� " N 4 w r''X any } { WMA S`01-0- ° .iWPOf OIGE5�ER9 'y}R±i tlUII VINO g1:L5E TNGP 3-AFLUWi IRMISiR 3iA91QN� t g ,POMP.9iA>IpN WAUMG PROP 9UR f i €CUAptA9 11 CN pIL0111NE OANRAOT? "' O f y 4gt'i3 3f1�9YY s 1 c� s s UPS r 4 sc f i —� z11,M1,14 �� IIOLC h'OMfS CVEXGIA 5 Y wF Y X 1iAt NY OXO � M Y 1 _ _ aivnry j � e-RAW wFLUENr uxE .._. \ I. 1 INRUExT PS RAPID I L-J"�� INFILTRATON I BASINS "- - - BRUM SCREENS / S410GBEXDCPE.1 LAKE I � -1 IF I 1 PLACID III I11 CANAL PRCPoseo eloLoaoAL L _ J I A �I� 1r""i� 1REA.Mf NT ": PROPOSED ' (CCNCREIE-1]'WFLOW ED, IB'SM9) / EWALRAPON L----J � FVIVRE SWDGE J L OI6ESTDN/GNANIY i TNIcxENINc i ENR P6 ��\\ ( PROP05ED �/ \ / Rj / \ pEUTRICA- i �- u- al BILGAER UIl01NG SLUDGE CRVINO \` fiE0 w \ I / 45.00 E.DDE RNSE PUMP �_I DIGESTON/GRANTY STATON _ IHICNENING III BLDRES5II - I CPERAT WSI �MIIDIN 'Il DUIl01x0 I I I PRW ED FILTERS EO TOBE DECANT CONVERTEO RWMED "� -� COTACCALORINE DNTACi EFRUENT 1RANSFFA / REUSE /.REJECT \ FUIURE FUNflE WA PUMP STAIGN SRORAGE 1 WATER 1 REJECT EFSLU EN)(�TC 1 % \\ 6iURADE % OPAJHM P6NRN EVEg444E5 [NY COWERA.C4VNN. ttOgOA 6.Oq lam cIIY Of IIUP MWATEq ?0]/1'/' LE MONTE °"e'11191?51�'1.On UCIIDX FIGlI0.E 15 exo. sw-M wecrs .�.,vm—P, n. amm xo. PVN Out of the three precast biological treatment options, the option with a side water depth of 18 feet with rectangular clarifiers is preferred, to maximize space on the plant site due to its smaller footprint. Also, using rectangular clarifiers allows for the structures to be built out of precast concrete allowing for a longer useful life versus circular steel clarifiers. Selected Alternative (Phasin ) The fifth alternative listed above, of concrete (precast) biological treatment basins with an 18 feet side water depth and rectangular clarifiers is the preferred alternative. This alternative would consist of two stages of phasing. The first phase would consist of two new clarifiers, two new effluent filters, new effluent transfer pump station and new reuse pump station being constructed. These proposed structures will be constructed in close proximity to the existing biological treatment basins, allowing for minimum piping modifications during phasing to get the new clarifiers online and operating. The existing plant would be able to continue its normal operations while these structures are constructed and put into service immediately after completion. After the new structures and piping are put into service, they would be able to be immediately utilized and put on line to produce reuse quality water. The second phase would consist of building and installing the two new biological treatment basins, new electrical/blower building, new rectangular flow equalization tank, and drum screens. Also, during the second phase of construction, the previously before mentioned structures in poor condition would be demolished; while those able to be rehabilitated would be rehabilitated, equipped with new equipment and placed into service. Demolition would allow room for the new structures to be constructed as well as make room for future expansion. Refer to Figure 14 Alternative 5 and Figure 15 Proposed Plant Site. Design Criteria The design criteria for the expansion of the City of Everglades City Reclaim Water Production Facility can be found in Tables 9 and 10 below. Table 9 — Design Criteria Peak Flow (Rain Event) Peak Hourly Flow (8" pipe) 500 gpm Maximum Daily Flow 400,000 gpd Maximum Weekly Flow 300,000 gpd Maximum Month Flow 250,000 gpd Influent BOD (Monthly) 170 lb/d Influent NH3 (Monthly) 30 lb/d Table 10 — Design Criteria Peak Flow (Tourist Season) Peak Hourly Flow (Special Event) 300 gpm Maximum Daily Flow (Special Event) 300,000 gpd Maximum Week 275,000 gpd Maximum Month 250,000 gpd Influent BOD (Monthly) 340 lb/d Influent NH3 (Monthly) 60 lb/d Influent BOD (Max Day) 510 Ib/d Influent NH3 (Max Day) 90 Ib/d Pk1 Process Design Summary The Process Design is summarized in Table 11 below. Table 11 — Process Design Summary Minimum Process/equipment Type Number Capacity Influent Screening of Units Peale Hourly Flow Influent Screening Drum Screen 2 500 gpm each Influent Pump Station Submersible 3 300 gpm/pump Flow Equalization Basin In-line 2 80,000 gal each Biological Treatment Pump Station Submersible 3 250 gpm/pump Biological Treatment BNR 2 120,000 gal each Secondary Clarifiers Steel Tank 2 500 A2 each Effluent Filters Disk 2 150 gpm each Effluent Transfer Pump Station Above ground 2 300 gpm/pump Reuse Water Storage Tank (existing) Steel Tank 1 200,000 gal Reuse Pump Station Above ground 2 450 gpm/pump Reject Water Storage Tank (existing) Steel tank 1 200,000 gal Table 12 — Process and Equipment Limitations Process/equipment Type Minimum Value Design Criteria Influent Screening Flow limited/non-equalized Peale Hourly Flow 500 gpm Influent Pump Station Flow limited/non-equalized Peale Hourly Flow 500 gpm BNR Pump Station Flow limited/equalized Max. Daily Flow 280 gpm BNR System Organic and Nitrogen limited Tourist Season Max. Day 510 lb/d BOD (2 units in service) 90 lb/d NH3 Clarifiers Flow limited/equalized Max. Daily Flow 280 gpm RML pumps BNR process limited 4 X MMADF 600 gpm RAS pumps Flow limited/equalized 1 X MMADF 280 gpm Filters Flow limited/equalized Max. Daily Flow 280 gpm Chlorine Contact Flow limited/equalized Max. Daily Flow 280 gpm Effluent Transfer Pump Flow limited/equalized Max. Daily Flow 280 gpm Station Reuse Pump Station Customer demand 8 hrs/d @ MMADF) 420 gpm 23 Design Capacity The following outlines the Design Capacity for the City of Everglades City. 1. Influent Flow a. Peale Tourist Season [higher population, dry season, low infiltration and inflow] i. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow, 250,000 gallons per day ii. Maximum Week Average Daily Flow, 275,000 gallons per day iii. Maximum Daily Flow (Special Events), 300,000 gallons per day iv. Peale Hourly Flow (unequalized), 400 gallons per minute v. Peale Hourly Flow (equalized), 250 gallons per minute vi. Influent BOD (maximum day), 510 pounds per day vii. Influent BOD (maximum month average day), 340 pounds per day viii. Influent Ammonia (maximum day), 90 pounds per day ix. Influent Ammonia (maximum month average day), 60 pounds per days b. Rainy Season [lower population, high infiltration and inflow] i. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow, 250,000 gallons per day ii. Maximum Week Average Daily Flow, 300,000 gallons per day iii. Maximum Daily Flow (major rain event), 400,000 gallons per day iv. Peak Hourly Flow (unequalized), 500 gallons per minute v. Peak Hourly Flow (equalized), 300 gallons per minute vi. Influent BOD (maximum month average day), 170 pounds per day vii. Influent Ammonia (maximum month average day), 30 pounds per day 2. Influent Screens (proposed) a. Rotating Drum screens on concrete pad at grade b. Two screens @ 500 gallons per minute each 3. Influent Pump Station (proposed) a. Submersible pumps in below ground wetwell b. Three pumps @ 300 gpm each 4. Flow Equalization Basin (proposed) a. Rectangular precast concrete tank b. Two compartments 16ft x 36ft x 18ft side water depth c. 150,000 gallons or 50% of maximum daily flow during peak tourist season, or 37.5% of maximum daily flow during rainy season Maximum Daily influent BOD design criteria used for both process trains in service and for design of aeration system. 3 Maximum Month Average Daily influent BOD design criteria used for BNR process treating 75% of the design criteria with one unit out of service. 4 Maximum Daily influent Ammonia design criteria used for both process trains in service and for design of aeration system. 5 Maximum Month Average Daily influent Ammonia design criteria used for BRN process treating 75% of the design criteria with one unit out of service. 6 Peak Hourly Flow (unequalized) design criteria used of sizing influent screens and influent pump station, 100% of this flow must be provided with one unit out of service. 7 Peak Hourly Flow (equalized) design criteria used to size secondary clarifiers, effluent filters and disinfection system treating 75% of the design criteria with one unit out of service. Peak Hourly Flow (equalized) design criteria used to size effluent transfer pumps at 100% of design criteria with one unit out of service. 24 5. BNR Influent Pump Station (proposed) a. Pumps at grade on concrete slab b. Three pumps @ 200 gpm each c. VFD driven pumps operated to maintain desired daily flow setpoint (flow meter on pipe to BNR basin) 6. BNR Process Basin (proposed) a. Five -stage Bardenpho to produce 5-5-3-1 effluent, refer to attached nitrogen removal design calculations. b. Two parallel process trains i. Fermentation zone, 10,000 gallons each ii. First Anoxic zone, 25,000 gallons each iii. Nitrification zone, 60,000 gallons each iv. Second Anoxic zone, 25,000 gallons each v. Reaeration zone, 10,000 gallons each c. Precast concrete tanks with width of 13 feet and 18 feet side water depth i. Each process train will consist of two parallel tanks 1. Fermentation zone, one at 6 feet long each train 2. First Anoxic zone, one at 14 feet long each train 3. Nitrification zone, one at 34 feet long each train 4. Second Anoxic zone, one at 14 feet long each train 5. Reaeration zone, one at 6 feet long each train ii. Each train will consist of a tank. 74 feet long x 13 feet wide x 18 side water depth. d. A single submersible mixer in each Fermentation, First Anoxic and Second Anoxic zone. e. Fine bubble diffused aeration system in each Nitrification zone and each Reaeration zone i. First half of each nitrification zone to be able to provide 30% of total aeration requirement [3 00 scfm]. ii. Second half of each nitrification zone to be able to provide 20% of total aeration requirement [200 sefm]. iii. Each reaeration zone to be able to provide 10% of total aeration requirement [100 scfm]. f. Two submersible Return Mixed Liquor pumps installed near the end of Second half of each nitrification zone. Each RML pump to have a capacity of 300 gpm. g. Ability to add alum to reaeration zone for enhanced phosphorus removal and for improved downstream settling and filtration if needed [not included in package plant scope of supply]. h. Ability to add supplemental carbon source to each First Anoxic zone and to each Second Anoxic zone in order to increase denitrification reaction rate. Ability to add supplemental carbon source to each Fermentation zone in order to increase influent carbon content to stabilize biological process due to high degree of dilution due to inflow and water treatment plant concentrate [not included in package plant scope of supply]. 25 7. Blowers (proposed) a. Four blowers, due to large ratio between air required during summer off-peak season and winter peak -tourist season. b. Design for maximum hourly BOD and Ammonia loading to be handled with all four blowers in service. c. Blower air flow required for nitrogen removal processes at both Collier County regional wastewater treatment plants (fine bubble diffusers) have been optimized from a process control standpoint at between 3.0 and 3.5 scfm per pound of influent ammonia per day. These optimized performance values were developed for deep aeration basins, so will need to adjust for shallow basins. Use 5 scfin per pound of influent ammonia per day for these basins. d. Influent Ammonia (maximum day), 90 pounds per day e. Use peak hour factor of 150% (equalized flow). f. Air required = (5 scfm/lb NH3/day) x 90 Ib N113/day x 1:5 = 675 scfm total g. 675 scfm/4 = 169 scfm per blower, say 200 scfin per blower. 8. Secondary Clarifiers (proposed) a. Two rectangular clarifiers i. 12.5 feet wide x 40 feet long x 12 feet side water depth ii. 500 square feet each b. Peak hour design i. Two clarifiers at equalized flow during rainy season ii. 300 gallons per minute or 435,000 gpd iii. 435,000 gpd/1000 sq ft = 436 gpd/sq ft a Maximum Month Average Daily Flow design i. Two clarifiers at 250,000 gpd ii. 250,000 gpd/1000 sq ft = 250 gpd/sq ft d. Peak hour design (class I reliability) i. One clarifier @ 75% of equalized flow during rainy season ii. 300 gallons per minute x 75% = 225 gpm or 325,000 gpd iii. 325,000 gpd/500 sq ft = 650 gpd/sq ft e. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow design (class I reliability) i. One clarifier @ 75% of 250,000 gpd = 187,500 gpd ii. 187,500 gpd/500 sq ft = 375 gpd/sq ft 9. RAS/WAS Pump Station (proposed) a. Pumps on above ground concrete slab b. Three pumps, piped with one pump per clarifier with installed spare between them which can handle either clarifier c. VFD driven pumps to operate to a desired flow rate (flow meter on RAS pipe to each clarifier) d. 100% of Maximum Daily Flow, 400,000 gpd e. 200,000 gpd/1440 min/day = 140 gpm per RAS pump f. WAS pumped to digester by diverting RAS flow for a calculated time each day based on WAS pumping rate (per flow meter). 26 10. Effluent Filters (proposed) a. Two Cloth disk filters b. Peak hour design i. Two filters at equalized flow during rainy season, 300 gpm ii. 300 gpm/2 = 150 gpm per filter c. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow design L Two filters at 250,000 gpd ii. 125,000 gpd/1440 minutes per day= 90 gpm per filter d. Peak hour design (class I reliability) i. One filter @ 75% of equalized flow during rainy season ii. 300 gallons per minute x 75%= 225 gpm per filter e. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow design (class I reliability) L One filter @ 75% of 250,000 gpd = 187,500 gpd ii. 187,500 gpd/1440 minutes per day= 130 gpm per filter 11. Chlorine Contact Basins (proposed) a. Two parallel basins, design for 100% back-up based on minimum HRT b. Peak hour flow minimum HRT, 20 minutes c. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow HRT, 30 minutes d. Peak hour design i. One basin at equalized flow during rainy season, 300 gpm ii. 300 gpm x 20 minutes= 6,000 gallons minimum e. Maximum Month Average Daily Flow design L One basin at 250,000 gpd ii. 250,000 gpd/1440 minutes per day= 180 gpm per basin iii. 180 gpm x 30 minutes = 5,400 gallons minimum f. Use 6,000 gallons per chlorine contact basin i. Side water depth of 8 feet ii. Surface area = (6,000 gallons/7.48 gal/cu ft)/6.75 ft = 120 sq ft iii. Use two tanks with baffled channel width of 4 feet (down and back) for a total inside tank width of 8 feet by length of 15 feet. iv. Each tank volume = 2 x 4 ft x 15 ft x 6.75 ft x 7.48 gal/cu ft= 6,050 gallons 12. Effluent Transfer Pump Station (proposed) a. Pumps installed on at grade concrete pad b. Three pumps @ 200 gpm each, constant speed c. Pumps draw suction from wetwell at the end of the chlorine contact tanks 13. Reuse Storage Tank (existing) a. Not in package plant scope of supply 14. Reject Storage Tank (existing) a. Not in package plant scope of supply 27 15. Reuse Pump Station (proposed) a. Pump maximum month average daily flow during six hours per day to reuse customers from the reuse tank b. Pumps on concrete slab at grade c. Three pumps installed, in the event one pump is out of service, then extend hours per day to provide reuse water to customers. Excess reuse water to be discharge to existing on-site Rapid Infiltration Basins. d. VFD driven to maintain desired system discharge pressure e. (250,000 gpd/360 min/day) = 700 gpm total, or 200 gpm per pump 16. Reject Water/Plant Drain Pump Station (proposed) a. Submersible pumps b. Two pumps, constant speed c. One pump able to return maximum month average daily flow to Flow Equalization Basin in two days. d. 250,000 gpd/2880 minutes = 90 gpm per pump, say 100 gpm per pump 17. Aerated Sludge Holding Tank (existing, not in package.plant scope of supply) a. Rehab one of two existing tanks, demolish tank in worst condition b. Rehab existing Flow Equalization tank c. Install new coarse bubble diffiisers d. Rehab existing blowers as necessary 18. Sludge Drying Beds (existing, not in package plant scope of supply) a. No work is anticipated b. In the event that sludge drying beds are not satisfactory to dewater 100% of sludge then periodically a portable centrifuge with sludge hauling truck will be contracted to remove sludge from the aerated sludge holding tanks. 28 Class I Reliability Table 13 provides Class 1 Reliability criteria. Process/equipment Number of Units Table 13 -Class I Reliability Reliability Influent Screening 2 100% backup Influent Pump Station 3 1 spare pump BNR Pump Station 3 1 spare pump Clarifier 2 1 unit can handle 75% of flow (MMADF) BNR 2 2 units can handle max day 250,000 gpd Max day (tourist season) 1 unit can handle 75% of (MMADF) Filter 2 1 unit can handle 75% of flow (MMADF) 340 lb BOD/d 2 units can handle max day Chlorine Contact Basin 2 1 unit can handle 50% of flow 1 unit can handle 75% of flow (MMADF) Value 500 gpm each 300 gpm each 250 gpm ea. w/ VFD 187,500 gpd each 255 lb/d BOD each 45 lb/d NH3 each 255 lb/d BOD each 45 lb/d NH3 each 210 gpm each 140 gpm each 140 gpm each 140 gpm each Five -stage Bardenpho Process Design Summary The following process design calculations are provided below for the City of Everglades City proposed expansion. Max day (rainy season) 400,000 gpd Max week (rainy season) 300,000 gpd Max month (rainy season) 250,000 gpd Max month (rainy season) 170 lb BOD/d 30 Ib NH3/d Max day (tourist season) 300,000 gpd Max week (tourist season) 275,000 gpd Max month (tourist season) 250,000 gpd Max day (tourist season) 510 lb BOD/d 90 lb NH3/d Max month (tourist season) 340 lb BOD/d 60 lb NH3/d • BNR Reactor designed based on max organic and nitrogen loading • Class I Reliability: Max month organic and nitrogen loading handled by 1 out of 2 process trains @ 75% of influent load. • Max daily organic and nitrogen loading handled by both process trains in service. 29 Influent Flow (equalized) Limiting Condition is Class I Reliability Design 187,500 gallons per day per train (one out of two trains) @ 75%= 187,500 gpd Influent Quality BOD = 163 mg/1 (340 lb/d) x 75% = 255 lb/d TSS = 192 mg/1 (400 lb/d) x 75% = 300 lb/d NH3 = 30 mg/I (60 lb/d) x 75% = 45 lb/d NO3 = 0 mg/1 Internal Recycle Ratio: 4:1 RAS Ratio 1:1 Effluent Quality BOD = 5 mg/1 TSS = 5 mg/1 TN = 3 mg/1 TP =1 mg/1(alum added for polishing) WAS 0.8 lb WAS/Ib BOD 0.041b TN/Ib WAS Nitrogen Balance Influent: 30 mg/I Effluent: 2 mg/1 WAS: 5 mg/1 Net removed: 23 mg/I (Denitrification) Mass Balance on Nitrate X1 —mass entering 1st Anoxic X2 = mass entering 2d Anoxic Q 1 = flow entering 1" Anoxic = Qrml + Qras + Q Qrml RML flow from nitrification = 4Q Qras = RAS flow from clarifiers = Q Q1=4Q+Q+Q=6Q Assume Influent and RAS flows have low nitrogen, So flow entering 1st Anoxic with nitrate = 4Q Q2 = flow entering 2nd Anoxic = Qras + Q = 2Q Nitrogen removed in 1st Anoxic is 2x 2nd Anoxic Denitrification rate in 1st Anoxic twice as fast as 2"d Anoxic Make 1" Anoxic and 2"d Anoxic zones the same size Use denitrification rate of 0.04 lb NO3/Ib MLSS-d for 1st Anoxic zone and Use 3125 mg/1 MLSS denitrification rate of 0.02 lb NO3/lb MLSS-d for 2"d Anoxic zone 1't Anoxic @ 2/3`d of Denitrification (2/3)(23 mg/1)(0.1875 MG/d) = 0.025 MG 30 (3125 mg/l MLSS)(0.04 NO3/1\4LSS-d) 2nd Anoxic @ 1/3`d of Denitrification (1/3)(23 mg/1)(0.1875 MG/d) = 0.025 MG (3125 mg/I MLSS)(0.02 NO3/MLSS-d) Nitrification Use 0.03 Ib NH3/]b MLSS-d for nitrification zone Nitrify 30 mg/l NH3 (30 mg/1 NH3)(0.1875 MG/d) = 0.060 MG (3125 mg/1 MLSS)(0.03 NH3/MLSS-d) Fermentation Residence Time of 45 minutes Flow = Q + Qras = 2Q (45 min)(0.30 MG/d) = 0.010 MG (1440 mind) Reaeration Same volume as Fermentation 0.010 MG Total volume per train = 0.010 + 0.025 + 0.06 + 0.025 + 0.010 = 0.13 MG per train Overall hydraulic detention time= (0.13 MG)(24 hr/d) = 25 hours (MMAF/2 trains) (0.125 MG/d) Class I Reliability = (0.13 MG)(24 hr/d) = 16.6 hours (0.1875 MGD/ train) (0.1875 MG/d) Include ability to add supplemental organic source to both 1" Anoxic and 2nd Anoxic to enhance denitrification rate if needed. Include ability to add alum to reaeration zone for mixing prior to the clarifier for additional phosphorus removal, enhanced settling and filterability as needed. Fermentation 0.010 MG I" Anoxic 0.025 MG Nitrification 0.060 MG 2nd Anoxic 0.025 MG Reaeration 0.010 MG 0.130 MG 31 SECTION 9. CERTIFICATIONS 1, Certifications for Construction of New Facilities or Modifications to Existing Facilities a. Applicant or Authorized Representative I certify that Iha statements made in this application for a permit and all a[molunonis are true, corrocI, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I ngree to retain the design engineer, or another professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observation of construction, to prepare a notification of completion of cravat action, and to review record drawings for adequacy as referenced in Rule 62-620,630, F.A.C. Forther, I agree to provide an appropriate operation and maintenance manual for the facilities punsuant to Rule 62-620.630, F.&C, and to retain a professional engineer registered in Florida to examine (or to prepare or revise, if necessary) the manual. For projects regulated by Chapter 62-610, F.A.C., I agree to provide the additional operation requirements of that Chapter, -J 4 3/07/2017 (Signmuk of Applicant or Date Authorized Representative l) Sammy Hamilton, Jr. City of Everglades City - Name (please type): Company Name: Florida Registration Number: (239)605.3701 Telephone No, (including area code) mayorhamllton@aoTeom Email (optional) b• Professional Engineer Registered in Florida Po Box 110 Company Street Address or P 0 Box Everglades City, FL 34139-110 City/State/Zip Code: I certify that the engineering features of this domestic wastewater project have been (designed) (examined) by me and found to conform to engineering principles applicable to such projects. In my professional judgment, this facility, when properly constructed, operated, and maintained, will comply with all applicablestatmes of the State of Florida and rules of the Department. Ronald E. Benson, Jr. Hole Montes, Inc. Name (please type): Company Name: 39996 950 Encore Way Florida Regisliation Number: Company Street Address or P 0 Box Telephone No.(moluding tV coepuvMRQe.... . City/State/Zip Code: Ron6enson@hmen �`c P . •y t(. !.,4 Email(opliolA-�:' fir). 39926 i, gnalwv, (Qyea?iDate, Registration No.) 1�i-a j _... y � •. • � c OF .' L I If signed by the authorized representative, attach a letter ofautho•ization. Vc lero,6269o,916(2) 2A-31 c. Professional Engineer Registered in Florida I certify that this firm or individual has been retained by the applicant to prepare a notification of completion of construction, to prepare operation slid maintenance manuals, and to review record drawings for adequacy as referenced in Rules 62-620.630, 62-600.717, and 62-600.720, F.A,C. Ronald E. Benson, Jr. Name (please type): 39996 Florida Registration Number: (239) 254-2000 „`oprauwnnaryurr 'telephone No. (includin4safTe��n' ,,, -,.. Ron'und `ere • ? l:anail(optif) pe No. 39926 2. Certifications for Permit IieCa nei a. Applicant or Authorized Represe`2nt�Bn , Hole Mantes, Inc, CompanyNamc: 950 Encore Way Company Street Address or P O Box Naples, FL 34110 City/State/'Lip Code: F`'�•2so s2r Date, Registration No,) 1 certify that the statements made in this atIfift ttitdlBT& a permit and all attachments are true, correct one complete to the best of my wnowledge and belief, I agree to operate and maintain these wastewater facilities in such a manner as to comply with the provisions of Chapter 403, F.S., Chapter 62-600, F.A.C., and all other applicable rules ofthe Department. Further, an appropriate operation and maintenance manual which has been examined by a professional engineer as certified below is available and located at and can be submitted upon request as part of the permit procedure. A copy of the record drawings or other plans (as applicable) showing moditications to existing acilities, as referenced in Rule 62-600.717, F.A.C., Is available at the same location. I also understand that a permit if granted by the Department, is transferable only upon Department approval in accordance with Rule 62- 620.340, F.A,C., and I will notify the Department in aecordancewith this rule upon sale or legal transfer of the permitted facilities, In the event of abandonment or inactivation of the facilities, I will notify the Deparanent and ensure that public health and safety are protected as required by Rate 62.620.610, F.A.C. (Signature ofApphcant or Date Autho'ized Repi esentative2) Name (please type) Company Name Title Company Suvot Address at P 0 Box - I"elephone No. (including area code) City, State, Zip Code Email (optional) ------- z If Signed by the authorized representative, attach a letter of authorization. Opp pmm 62 620,9111(2) 2A-32 b. Professional Engineer I certify that the engineering features of these domestic wastewater facilities have been examined by me and found to conform to engineering principles applicable to such projects. I certify that the operation and maintenance manual for these wastewater facilities has been prepared or examined by me or by individual(s) under my direct supervision and that there is reasonable assurance, in my professional judgement, that the facilities, when properly operated and maintained in accordance with this manual, will comply with all applicable statutes of the State of Florida and rules of the Department. Name (please type): Florida Registration Number: Telephone No. (including area code) Email Address (optional) DEP Form 62-620.910(2) 2A-33 art &� U1 /0 Company Name: Company Street Address or P 0 Box City/State/Zip Code: (Seal, Signature, Date, Registration No.) Office of the County Manager [,Go E, 0,hS, .i1'. 92.rTpm-imil _Ea_r_ 902• Na,G 03, 252-q3,'13 - Fk (239,I =4016 March 20, 2017 { iilt vi Cri:'f;JP;; � Marcn zo, zov Mr .Jon M.Igtehart ° Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Director of L)istricl Management -- —� South District, P.O. Box 2549 Fort Myers, Ft. 33902-2549 RE: Everglades City Utilities Dear Mr, tglehaw ht continuing our conversation regarding assistance to Everglades City and in response to voter tetter dated March 3, 2017, we placed an item on our March 14. 2017 Commission agenda seeking authority to begin formal discussions with FDIT (Iters l 1 C) attached). ThrOUgh discussions with our Board members both individually and collectively there is an expressed interest in supporting the hetritlr and wellbehtg ol'the Everglades City utility eastorners, With that said, there. was also a strong consensus chat we hike a thoughtlill and Cautious approach as we move forward. With the Board's approval, our tears is now available to begin those formal discussions regarding the proposed receivership option with the caveats that we would work together to make sure sufficient finding was available and that tlic Caunlv's liability would he limited. Dr. Yilmaz. and County Aitortrey 1etP Kaatzkow will represent the County as we move forward. Please feel free to coordimme with Thera directly. As always. please cto not hesitate to contact me should you have any additional questions or concerns. Sneere(v, Leo F. Ochs, ItZ County Manager CC Jeff Klatzkow, County Attorney Commissioner Nick Casalanguida, Deputy County Manager Dr. George Yihnaz, Public Utilities DCparto cut Ileac! t1.D 03/14/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to consider a request from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for Collier County to serve as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City Utilities system. OBJECTIVE: To receive direction on the request from FIYI.',P that Collier County consider serving as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City Utilities (ECU). CONSIDERATIONS: On February 21, 2017, FDFP met with staff discuss the condition of the ECU and to request that Collier County consider assisting in solving the problem. They identified that the potable water facility has been included in the existing wastewater complaint with the court, and that City management was amenable to work with FDEP on a plan to bring the utility back into compliance. FDEP noted that Collier County utilities has an exemplary record of delivering high quality water and wastewater services and is the closest utility provider that could manage the combined water/wastewater utility for the ECU. The concept of developing a temporary receivership agreement was put on the table for further consideration. The receivership option could be a provisional management vehicle until such time that a final solution is adopted. Ultimately, the ECU may reach a point that it is able to take back the management. Alternatively, other management structures via County Ordinance or Legislative action, considering the County itself, or a third -party Government Utility Authority may be adopted to properly manage the utility. On March 3, 2017, Collier County received a letter from FDEP formally requesting assistance and cooperation from Collier County Public Utilities (Attachment 1). The receivership concept for a period of up to two years, would allow, all interested parties time establish ail entity that would best serve the County's and the City's interests. The temporary nature of the receivership may also allow for the solicitation and expenditure of available state fiords for the rehabilitation and replacement of the water and wastewater facility infrastructure. As a condition of accepting a temporary receivership agreement, staff and the County Attorney would seek appropriate indemnification and would identify a sufficient funding plan. At this time, staff is only seeking Board approval to begin discussion with FDEP to refine the concept. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the General Fund (001) for the initial legal ECU receivership and general support up to $10,000 for speciat legal counsel expertise. GROWTH M'ANAGEM NT IMPACTt None specific to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERA`rIONSs This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for approval. -JAIL RECOMMENDATION- That. the Board (1) Considers the FD> P request for Collier County to serve as a temporary receiver. among other options, for the Everglades City Utilities; (2) directs staff to work with FDEP and bring back appropriate action items in the near future for Board action; (3) authorizes the County Attorney to retain special legal counsel to assist and provide needed legal expertise in this process; and (4) encourages the City of Everglades City to work Packet Pg. 284 cooperatively with FDEP and EPA to resolve the utility`s non-compliance. Prepared By: G. George Yilmaz, Public Utilities Department Ilead Jose,ph'Bellone. Director, Financial Operations Support Division A`1`TACHMENT(S) 1. FDEP Leite, - Everglades City -3-3-17 (PDF) 03/1.4/2017 Paoket Pg. 285 tvlarch 3, 2017 Florida Department of A"Iaxifini* i i South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 Mr. t.eo E:, hells, jr, County Manager County Manager's Office ;299' I'arnianti'Frail East, Suite 202 Naples, Fl, 14112-5746 Re: Fverglades City utilities Dear Mr, Ochs, Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Ryan E. Mathews Interim Secretary We appreciated the opporttntity to discuss the relcrenecd project with ('olber County staFPon February 21. The Department shared that the portable water facility has boen inohtded In the existing Waste Water treatment facility Complaint tvith the Court We also explained the funding limitations that have arisen from the Bron -compliance issnr hinally, we discussed paths forward to ensure the: affected citizens are provided safe and reliable water and wastewater service. The County has the opportunity to guide the future for the combined waterfwa eater utility for the City and surrounding unincorporated areas. The various options will take some time to vet, but conditions at the Facilities warrant a more expedited timetable 1`or action. The Department is wormno with the City to voluntarily turn over, through a current Court proceeding, the facilities and assets to a_receiver. A receiver could be a management: entity (Special l'loard) created by County Ordnance or Legislative action, the County itself, or a third -party Government tltilitY Authority_ The major co IMI) for any receiver is the potential monetary liability involved with the Facility. `I`he wastewater facility is under a Consent Order for essentially a complete rebuilding oftort. Mr. Lco E. Ochs, Jr. County Manager March 3, 2.017 Page 2 ol'2 During our discussions, the concept of the County serving as temporary receiver evolved. This could be the best option for several reasons. The ('other Count), Utilities department is of the finest in the State, and is very capable ol"assuming an oversight management role quickly to ensure continued service to the residents. As a temporary receiver for a period of up to two years, a utility authority could be created that would best serve the County's interests. The temporary nature of the receivership may also allow for the solicitation and expenditure of available state funds for the replacement of the wastewater facility h1fiaStrLiCiffre, The Department requests the County Consider serving as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City Utilities by directing staff to vet this option with us to help the Commission determine if it isan appropriate path forward. Sincerely, Director of District Management JMI/JC/ise February 9, 2017 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrictC)dep. state. A us The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Jr. The City of Everglades City PO Eox 110 Everglades City, Florida 34139-110 mayorbamilton(a,aol.com Re: Inspection Report City of Everglades City W WTP FLA027618 Collier County - DW Dear Mayor Hamilton: Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Ryan E. Matthews Interim Secretary An Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection was conducted at your facility on December 22, 2016. During this inspection, potential non-compliance was noted. Specifically, potential non-compliance with the requirements of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Chapter 62-600, Chapter 62-610 and Chapter 62-620, Florida Administrative Code, was observed. Please see the attached inspection report for a full account of Department observations. Please address any questions to Toni Fonseca of the South District Office at 239-344-5630 or via e-mail at Toni.FonsecaAdep.state.fl.us. Sincerely, Jennifer L. Carpenter Assistant District Director South District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosures: Inspection Report (with attachments) cc: Tim Stephens, operator (timstephens8467Agmail.com) www.deAstate.tl.us FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WASTEWATER COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Facility Name and Physical Address WAFR ID County Entry Date Entry Time Everglades City WWTF FLA027618 Collier 12/22/2016 10:05 AM Copeland Avenue And Kumquat S 10. *Effluent Disposal NE 5.♦Records &Reports SC 8.♦Operation &Maintenance NE 1t. Residuals/Sludge NE Everglades City, FL 33929 Facility Phone # 13.♦SSG Survey Exit Date Exit Time (239) 695-3781 General 12/22/2016 11:30 AM LAT 2S 51 11 Permit General The facility is operating without a wastewater permit. UPHI LoxG 81 23 04 Records and Reports General Falsification of any record or report FARR Name(s) of Field Representatives(s)and Title Operator Certification# Email The Pemditee failed to report noncompliance to the Department within 24 hours as required by 62-620.610(20), F.A.C. Phone Tim Stephens A0005472 Timstephens8467@gmail.com (239)695-3781 Name & Address of Permittee L Designated Rep. Title Email Phone Sammy Hamilton JR Mayor mayorhamilton@aol.com (239) 695-3781 PO Box 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 Inspection Type E g j Samples Taken(Y/N): N Sample ID#: Samples Split (Y/N) X Domestic El Industrial FACILITY COMPLIANCE AREAS EVALUATED Recommended Actions; Click or mp here at ecter test. IC —In Compliance, MC =Minor Out of Compliance; NC= Out of Compliance; SC =Significant out of Compliance; NA =Not Applicable; NE =Not Evaluated Significant Non -Compliance Criteria Should be Reviewed when Out of Compliance Ratings Are Given in Areas Marked by a SELF MONITORING Name and Signature of Reviewer Deanna Newburg "'�"'a'. PERMITS/ORDERS PROGRAM FACILITY OPERATIONS EFFLUENTIDISPOSAL SC 1. *Permit NE 3. Laboratory NC 6. Facility Site Review SC 9. ♦Effluent Quality SC 2. *Compliance Schedules NE 4. Sampling NE 7. Flow Measurement NC 10. *Effluent Disposal NE 5.♦Records &Reports SC 8.♦Operation &Maintenance NE 1t. Residuals/Sludge NE 12. Groundwater NC 14.Other— DMR flow information not reported correctly. NE 13.♦SSG Survey Facility and/or Order Compliance Status: ❑ In -Compliance 17 Out -Of -Compliance X Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Recommended Actions; Click or mp here at ecter test. Name(s) and Signature(s) ofInspectcr(s) Toni Fonseca District.Office/Phone Number (239)344-5630 Date 12/29/2016 Name and Signature of Reviewer Deanna Newburg "'�"'a'. District Office/Phone Number (239)344-5677 Date 2/9/2017 Version 1.1 Effective 01/04/17 Page 1 of 7 Single Event Violations Check for Yes Evaluation Area Description Findlimr Descritation Finding ID n Effluent Disposal General. Operation of unpermitted disposal system at a permitted facility. EDUN ❑ Laboratory General The laboratory is not certified by the Department of Health. INCE Permit General Unauthorized discharge from the collection system with a high potential for water quality or health impacts UNBP Permit General The facility is operating without a wastewater permit. UPHI Records and Reports General Falsification of any record or report FARR Records and Reports General The Pemditee failed to report noncompliance to the Department within 24 hours as required by 62-620.610(20), F.A.C. RSWP Version 1.1 Effective 01/04/17 Page 1 of 7 Facility Treatment Summary: Wastewater treatment: An existing 0.160 million gallons per day, annual average daily flow (MGD, AADF) advanced domestic wastewater treatment plant consisting of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, aerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds, filtration, chlorination, a O.X million gallon (MG) reject storage tank, and a 0.01�milliongallon (MG) reclaimed water storage tank. The facility has two disposal method R-01 and R-02. R-01 is two existing rapid infiltration basins with a permitted capacity of 0.115 MGD AADF. R-02 is an existing slow -rate public access ruse system with a permitted capacity of 0.152 MGD AADF. R-02 is not operating due to equipment failures. L Permit: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Current Permit available on-site? See Observation Date Permit issued March 7, 2016 Date Permit Expires March 6, 2021 Permit Renewal Application due by September 7, 2020 Administrative or Judicial Orders? Administrative Order 1.1 Observation: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure compliance with the Administrative Order. 2. Compliance Schedules: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Compliance Schedule in Permit met? See Observation Compliance Schedules in Order are being met? Choose an item. 1.2 Observation: Administrative Order AO -2016-027618 required the permittee to prepare and submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report by June 15, 2016. The permittee has not complied with this requirement. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure compliance with the Administrative Order. 3. Laboratory: Not Evaluated Contract Lab Name and Certification # Facility DOH Certification # 3.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 4. Sampling: Not Evaluated Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 2 of 7 Sampling conducted during inspection? See Observation Sampling observed during inspection? See Observation Sampling conducted at locations identified by the permit? See Observation Safe access to sampling locations? See Observation 4.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 5. Records and Reports: Out -of -Compliance Documents/Records reviewed Timeframe Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) November 2016 5.1 Observation: The permittec's facility is limited to 0.115 MGD AADF because reuse system R-02 is not operable. The permittee's DMRs indicate that the permittee may not be complying with this flow limitation. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure that DMRs are filled out correctly in accordance with the permit, repair R-02, and comply with the R-02 compliance schedule in the Administrative Order. 6. Facility Site Review: Out -of -Compliance 6.1 Observation: General - The facility grounds were secured properly. Additional Comments: Facility access gates were locked but there is a large gap between the gate pole and tree bushes which allows easy access. 6.2 Deficiency: General - The facility grounds were not clean or well maintained. Additional Comments: Large piles of debris were present around the treatment facility grounds. 6.3 Deficiency: AlternatePower - An alternative power source is not available at the WWTF. Additional Comments: The on-site generator is not functional. 6.4 Deficiency: AerationBasins/Act. Sludge — The aeration basins were not providing adequate mixing. Additional Comments: Several dead spots observed in the basins. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(3) states that all facilities and equipment necessary for the treatment, reuse, and disposal of domestic wastewater and biosolids shall be maintained, at a minimum, so as to function as intended Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure the facility and equipment necessary for treatment is being maintained to function as intended. Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 3 of 7 6.5 Observation: Blowers/Motors — The blower was operational at the time of the inspection. 6.6 Observation: Blowers/Motors — The secondary blower motor was operational. 6.7 Observation: Disinfection — The chlorine contact chamber was clean and the effluent leaving the plant was clear 6.8 Deficiency: Ponds/Lagoons — The treatment lagoon did not appear to have adequate freeboard space. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-610.516 states that rapid infiltration basins or percolation ponds shall be designed to provide a minimum of three feet of freeboard in order to protect the integrity of pond embankments. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure the three feet of freeboard is adhered. 7. Flow Measurement: Not Evaluated Flow meter present and location as per permit? See Observation Easy access to flow meter? See Observation Date of last flow meter calibration Not Evaluated 7.1 Observation: No observations were recorded. 8. Operation and Maintenance: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance Facility being operated as per permit? I No 8.1 Defrcieney: General — The facility was not being operated and maintained in accordance with the description in the Permit. Additional Comments: Excessive corrosion observed throughout treatment tanks. 8.2 Deficiency: General — Failure to perform maintenance resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts, and violation of reliability requirements. Additional Comments: Facility lack redundancy in many of the treatment components. It only has one pump at the flow equalization tank and one pump in the internal plant lift station. Only two of the three aeration blowers and two of the three RAS pumps were online. 8.3 Deficiency: General — Failure to replace malfunctioning equipment resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts. 8.4 Deficiency: General — Leaks were noted in the walls/pipes of the treatment plant. Everglades City WWTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 4 of 7 Additional Comments: Next to the chlorine contact chamber and the filters was a large puddle of water. Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-620.300(5) states that a permitted wastewater facility or activity shall not be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the terms of the permit. Correction Actions: Please take the necessary actions to ensure facility is operated and maintained as specified in your permit, and meets all reliability requirements in EPA MCD -05. 9. Effluent Quality: Significant -Out -Of -Compliance DMRs review period From 05/01/16 to 10/31/16 Any exceedances7 Yes 9.1 Deficiency: General - A review of the Discharge Monitoring Reports revealed the following effluent exceedance(s). Monitoring Period Exceedance Limit Amount 04/01/16-04/30/16 Total Nitrogen (Max)=21,0 Max = 6.0 Total Nitrogen (Wly avg) =5.25 Max - 4.5 Total Nitrogen (Mo avg) = 10.56 Max - 3.75 Total Suspended Solids = 124 Max=5.0 05/01/16-05/31/16 Total Nitrogen (Max)- 14.8 Max =6.0 Total Nitrogen (Wkly avg) =14.8 Max - 4.5 Total Nitrogen (Mo avg) = 11.5 Max - 3.75 Total Phosphorus (Max) = 5.31 Max = 2.0 Total Phosphorus (Wldy avg) - 5.31 Max --1.5 Total Phosphorus (Mo avg) = 2.87 Max=1.25 Total Suspended Solids - 91 Max --5.0 06/01/16-06/30/16 Total Nitrogen (Max)= 15.6 Max = 6.0 Total Nitrogen (Wly avg) = 15.6 Max - 4.5 Total Nitrogen (Me avg) - 8.28 Max = 3.75 Total Phosphorus (Wkly avg) = 1.67 Max=1.5 Total Suspended Solids =17.4 Max --5.0 07/01/16-07/31/16 Total Nitrogen (Max)= 9.37 Max = 6.0 Total Nitrogen (Wly avg) = 9.37 Max = 4.5 Total Nitrogen (Mo avg) = 4.68 Max = 3.75 Total Suspended Solids = 17.4 Max=5.0 08/01/16-08/31/16 Total Nitrogen (Max)= 8.03 Max = 6.0 Total Nitrogen (Wly avg) - 8.03 Max = 4.5 Total Nitrogen (Me avg) - 7.80 Max = 3.75 Total Suspended Solids - 17.4 Max --5.0 Flow -01 (50050) Anal Avg = 0.135 Max --0.116 09/01/16-09/30/16 Flow-01(50050)Annl Avg =0.135 Max=0.116 Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 5 of 7 10/01/16-10/31/16 Total Suspended Solids= 12.1 1 Max=5.0 Flow -01 (50050) Aunt Avg = 0.135 Max=0.116 Permit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(1) states that all domestic wastewater facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the applicable provisions of this chapter and related regulations so as to attain, at a minimum, the reclaimed water or effluent quality required by the wastewater facility permit Corrective Action: Please ensure to operate and maintain effluent quality as required by your permit. 9.2 Observation: General— The final effluent chlorine residual was within the acceptable range. Additional Comments: The in-line chlorine meter read 5.47 mg/L 10. Effluent Disposal: Out -of -Compliance Facility discharging? Yes Discharge location(s) as per permit? Yes 10.1 Deficiency: General —The facility was discharging at the time of the inspection Additional Comments: At the time of the inspection the facility was discharging to the pond. The ponds were not functioning as intended. Seepage was observed at the toe of the berm of the South pond. 10.2 Deficiency: General —The effluent had a visible sheen at the time of the inspection. Additional Comments: Operator thinks sheen is coming from treating RO plant waste. Pennit/Rule or Other Reference: F.A.C. Rule 62-600.410(1) states that all domestic wastewater facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the applicable provisions of this chapter and related regulations so as to attain, at a minimum, the reclaimed water or effluent quality required by the wastewater facility permit Corrective Action: Please ensure to operate and maintain effluent quality as required by your permit. 10.3 Observation: General — The effluent was free from excessive turbidity. 10.4 Observation: General — The effluent was free from excessive foam. Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 6 of 7 10.5 Observation: General — The percolation/evaporation ponds appeared to be well maintained. 11. ResiduaUSludEe: Not Evaluated 11.1 Observation: No observations were recorded 12. Groundwater Quality: Not Evaluated DMRs review period Not Evaluated Any exceedances? See Observation All monitoring wells accessible, secured & locked? See Observation 12.1 Observation: No observations were recorded 13. Rq0 Survev: Not Evaluated Does the facility have an Operation and Maintenance Not Evaluated Manual for their collection system? Does the facility track spills in their collection Not Evaluated system? How does the facility follow up on spills? Not Evaluated Does the facility have procedures for minimizing Not Evaluated spills? Are those procedures included in the Operation and Not Evaluated Maintenance Manual or in a separate document? How often is the manual updated? Not Evaluated 13.1 Observation: No observations were recorded 14. Other: Out -of -Compliance 14.1 Observation: Flow measurements nor correctly reported on DMR's in accordance with the permit. Corrective Action: Please review permit definitions for FLW-01, FLW-02, and FLW-03, and report flows per the permit. Where calculations are required to calculate an average, such as an annual average, complete the required calculations and report the calculated values per the permit. Everglades City W WTF FLA027618 Enforcement Reconnaissance Inspection 12/22/2016 Page 7 of 7 I certify that these photos represent the true on-site conditions observed Everglades City (FLA027618) and have not been altered in any way. Photos by Toni Fonseca on 12/22/2016 piles of debris maintain on the facility No littering Corrosion on ; no even flow to stilling well. Excessive corrosion on CCC with Everglades City (FLA027618) Photos by Toni Fonseca on 12/22/2016 I certify that these photos represent the true on-site conditions observed and have not been altered in any way. Leaks on treatment tanks lead to large puddles. Pond does not have a min. of 3ft of freeboard. Effluent has a sheen appearance WASTEWATER SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANCE (SNC) DOCUMENTATION Facility: Everglades City WWTF Inspection Date: 12/22/2016 Inspector: T. Fonseca Permit No: FLA027618 Permitted Capacity: 0.115 1. Permit ❑ Operating without a valid wastewater permit ❑ Unpermitted discharge with a high potential for water quality of health impacts ❑ Unauthorized bypass with a high potential for water quality or health impacts ❑ Unpermitted collection system with a high potential for water quality of health impacts ❑ Unauthorized substantial plant modification placed into service ❑ Unauthorized residuals or sludge disposal with a high potential for water quality of health impacts 2. Compliance Schedule ❑ Start Construction milestone exceeded by 90 days or more ❑ End construction milestone exceeded by 90 days or more ❑ Attainment of final compliance milestone exceeded by 90 days or more ® Failure to meet any other enforcement order or compliance schedule milestones by 90 days or more 3. Records and Reports ❑ Surface Water Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) late by 30 or more days ❑ Land -Application Effluent Discharge Monitoring Reports — 2 or more non -submittals in 6 mo. window ❑ Falsification of any record or report ❑ Compliance schedule report or final compliance report late by 30 or more days ❑ Pretreatment reports late by 30 or more days 4. Operation and Maintenance ❑ Improper operation resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts ® Failure to perform maintenance resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts ® Missing equipment resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts ® Failure to replace malfunctioning equipment resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts 5. Effluent ❑ Limit exceeded by TRC 2 out of 6 months (TRC Violation) ® Limit exceeded 4 out of 6 months (chronic effluent violation) ❑ Total Residual Chlorine for Disinfection below minimum 10% or more of the time in a rolling 6 month period ❑ Persistent acute toxicity through follow up tests ❑ Persistent chronic toxicity through follow up tests ❑ Pollutant passthrough with a high potential for water quality or health impacts (pretreatment) ❑ Any other violation with a high potential for water quality or health impacts 6. Effluent Disposal Method ❑ Operation of unauthorized disposal system ® Disposal system failure with a high potential for water quality or health impacts ® Failure to operate disposal system as designed with a high potential for water quality or health impacts ❑ Unauthorized modification of disposal system placed into service 7. Other Violations ® Any violation not listed above, or pattern of noncompliance, resulting in a high potential for water quality or health impacts — (Comments or Details supporting SNC finding must be provided.) Comments/Details: DMR's not properly filled out in accordance with permit requirements. Flow values reported incorrectly. ❑ Failure to implement pretreatment program or enforce indirect users where industrial contributions cause effluent limit or disposal violations ❑ Any violation considered Significant by Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Director of District Management, or the Division Director Version: August 7, 2000 June 8, 2016 jot ld Department o 11 t:ttRt113`?E.( i< 4' �d�„•-`jt4ii Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor cif Everglades City Everglades City Hall s n � f I 'IlnniOWU etul,c_y,r1 Post Office Box i 10 102 Copeland Avenue North Everglades City, Florida 34139-0110 Dear Mayor Hamilton: Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Interim Secretary I have enclosed with this letter the temporary injunction order the Department will be asking Judge Brodie to enter at the hearing scheduled for July()"' at 2:10 PM in the Collier County courthouse. I have also included a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Temporary injunction that I would like to have you and your attorney, if you retain one, consider signing. The Department believes that the requirements of the proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary injunction is a reasonable approach to addressing the unpennitted discharges from the wastewater treatment site and to assure that no future unpetmitted discharges occur. If the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Temporary Injunction is signed and returned to the by June 30, 2016, 1 will contact the judge's office and cancel the Judy 6"' hearing. If I don't receive the signed Joint Stipulation for Entry of Temporary Injunction by June 30, 2016; the Department will assume that the City is not interested in settling the temporary injunction issues and will proceed to make the.Departinent's case at the hearing on July 6"'. Siieigly, s f AaF Latry Rforgan' Senior Deputy General Counsel Phone: 850-245.2246 Enclosure IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH .I<UDICd L CIRCUIT tN AID FQ R COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON1 NT IENTAL PROTECTION_ Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 11 -2015 -CA -002134 EVERGLADES CITY, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION This cause carne before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Injunction and Memorandum of Law filed pursuant to Rule 1.610(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure against Defendant, Everglades City, seeking an order prohibiting the Defendant from discharging domestic wastewaters to waters of the state without a permit from the Department. Having considered the same and being otherwise duly informed, IT IS ADJU GED that: Within 10 days of the entry of this Order, the Defendant shall provide on -Site staffing by a Class C or higher wastewater certified operator 24 hours a day for 7 days a week to operate and maintain the Defendant's wastewater treatment facility located at Copeland Avenue and Kumquat Street in Everglades City (Site). 2. The Defendant shall take all practical actions needed to operate, repair and maintain the Defendant's wastewater treatment facility to eliminate any discharges from the Site. Within 10 days of the entry of this Order, the Defendant shall haul a sufficient amount of effluent from the percolation ponds at the Site whenever needed to eliminate any discharges from the percolation ponds via any overflow devices to waters of the state, if the practical operation and maintenance actions required in paragraph 2 above are insufficient to eliminate discharges from the percolation ponds at the Site. 4. The Defendant's certified operators shall provide written notice to the Plahiti_" within 24 hours of any discharge from the Site to the mangrove area adjacent to the Site or to any storm water swales that lead to the mangrove area adjacent to the Site. 5. If the Defendant fails to comply with this Order, the Plaintiff may file a Motion for Contempt with this Court. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the Court imposing appropriate sanctions. DONE AND ORDERED in Naples, Florida this day of July, 2016. Lauren L. Brodie Circuit Judge Copies famished: Larry Morgan Senior Deputy General Counsel Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 35 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Sammy Hamilton, Jr, r. / f Mayor of Everglades City l -) �� C Y! !9? e n-� <iz � `D Everglades City Hall 102 Copeland Avenue North Everglades City, Florida 34139 r °- City of Everglades City, Collier County, Florida Water and Wastewater Utility System A briefing to consider possible risk April 4, 2016 Prepared for: G. George Yilmaz, Ph.D., P.E. Public Utilities Department Collier County Government Prepared by: Ronald E. Benson, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Senior Vice President/Principal Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 34110 April 4, 2016 Executive Summa Collier County Public Utilities contracted with Hole Montes, Inc. to prepare an overview of the major issues/risks which a governmental entity might be faced with in the event they were to become responsible for the City of Everglades City Utility system. The scope of this assignment is rather limited and the intent was the findings reported herein would be at the order of magnitude level of detail based on the information sources provided by the County. If further consideration is deemed warranted, then an assessment of the utility system would need to be performed in order to assess the condition, future service life of existing systems, and potential capacity of existing systems to serve future customers, etc. One major consideration in this sort of overview of major issues/risks is, in the event Collier County were to be the entity taking over this utility, that it is the County's standard requirement that utility systems are required to be brought up to County standards as a condition of acceptance. It is understood that, in general, the City of Everglades City did not construct nor has maintained their system to this standard. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that a significant cost would be associated with bringing the system up to the County standards. Another major consideration is that two of the four communities served by the City of Everglades City water system are not currently served by the sanitary sewer system. It is believed that, in general, the existing homes in these areas are likely contributing to pollution of the environment surrounding them through wastewater percolating from septic tank drain fields. In addition, it may be difficult for vacant lots in these communities to be permitted for new on- site treatment/disposal systems. It may also be possible that Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) or other agencies may at some time mandate connection of these onsite systems to a central sanitary sewer system. While the past and current enforcement actions by FDEP against the City of Everglades City may have moved forward slowly over the years, due to the limited financial ability of the City of Everglades City, it is likely that Collier County would not be given as much understanding and time. A major consideration for potable water systems is the ability to provide sufficient fire protection for the communities being served. While, the ability of the existing fire hydrants to supply a minimum level of fire protection is uncertain, it is likely that many of the water lines may be of smaller size than would be permitted today. It is unlikely that Collier County government could overlook such shortcomings in the ability of the existing water system to meet current fire protection standards which are being applied throughout the rest of the County. Due to the limited scope of this engagement and rather short time available to perform this overview of major issues/risks, the format of this report is to present a series of items which were able to be discovered using the documents provided to Hole Montes, Inc. by Collier County which were supplemented by documents Hole Montes was able to obtain from FDEP, Big Cypress Basin, as well as through an internet search using Google.com. (A copy of these documents have been provided.) The only on-site investigation of any sort consisted of a windshield survey in order to confirm the understanding of the utility system which was otherwise obtained by the various written materials. Neither record drawings, nor inventory list of major system components, were made available for the existing utility system. The most recent Water and Wastewater Master Plan prepared for the City of Everglades City was obtained and did not include such detailed information, so estimating lengths of pipelines of unknown April 4, 2016 size, material of construction, or age was necessary and is only an order of magnitude estimate of the system's major components. It was deemed that in the event Collier County were to take over this system that conditions such as overflow of untreated or partially treated wastewater to the environment simply could not be allowed. This is the standard which Collier County Public Utilities applies throughout their system and the standard expected by FDEP. Therefore, in situations where such problems have been reported in the past by FDEP and other agencies, the direction has been taken to assume that whatever is needed to remediate such problems will be required as a minimum. The existing water system is estimated to supply potable water to approximately eight hundred residential housing units (single family, multi -family, mobile homes) plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units in denser park -type setting having private water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems. Based on the assumptions provided herein, it is assumed that approximately five hundred additional residential housing units may be served by this water utility through build -out (with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent). The existing sanitary sewer system is estimated to serve approximately five hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. It is assumed that the system will be expanded to serve all of Plantation Island and all of Chokoloskee accounting for an additional eight hundred residential housing units added to the sanitary sewer system through build -out (with an associated growth in commercial customers thru buildout on the order of 20 to 30 percent). No attempt to estimate the rate of population growth or timing for extending sanitary sewer service to existing areas is included in this briefing. The following is an order of magnitude estimate of costs which may be reasonably anticipated in the event that the City of Everglades City system was to be expanded and upgraded as identified herein. Based on the limited review and analysis, which constituted the scope of this work assignment, the following breakdown of potential future expenditures is provided below. The higher end of the range for each major system component assumes both build -out of the system as well providing a system meeting standards typical of those for the Collier County Public Utilities system. It is likely these expenditures could be phased over a ten year period, although no attempt to consider priorities has been included at this early stage. The costs provided herein has been divided into ten major categories and an order of magnitude range of potential costs necessary to address likely issues/risks was prepared for each. ➢ Water Supply $0.5 million to $1 million ➢ Water Treatment $1 million to $2.5 million ➢ Water Transmission $2 million to $5 million ➢ Water Distribution $3 million to $8 million ➢ Wastewater Collection $5 million to $9 million ➢ Wastewater Transmission $2 million to $5 million ➢ Wastewater Treatment $10 million to $12 million ➢ Wastewater Reuse $1.5 million to $2.5 million ➢ Wastewater Disposal $1 million to $6 million ➢ Telemetry and Control $2 million to $4 million Range of Total Potential Cost $30 million to $55 million April 4, 2016 Overview of the City of EverOades City's Water and Wastewater System Customer Base TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime during 2010. This report was presented to the Big Cypress Basin sometime in early 2011 along with a request for a grant to assist with funding construction of water supply wells. The following is a summary prepared from this report with regard to identifying the service area and major components of the City of Everglades City's Water and Wastewater System [here after will be referred to as City's W/WW System]. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water and wastewater service to the residents of the City of Everglades City. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water and wastewater service to a portion of the residents of community of Copeland. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water service to the residents of the community of Plantation Island. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water service to the residents of the community of Chokoloskee Island and provides wastewater service to a portion of the residents. ITEM: In 2010, potable water needs within the City's W/WW System were met using wells drawing from the surficial aquifer [shallow] which at the time were identified as "not able to meet current drinking water regulations for disinfection and disinfection by products." ITEM: Reclaimed water from the treatment of wastewater generated within the City's W/WW System was "utilized throughout the City for irrigation of medians and residential lawns." ITEM: The City's W/WW System consists of a low pressure wastewater collection system. ITEM: The "existing wastewater treatment facility is in need of extensive repairs." ITEM: Although the City's W/WW System "does not currently serve all areas of Plantation Island, Copeland and Chokoloskee Island, all of these areas were included in the demand projections for planning purposes." The estimates for the population within the City's W/WW System were between 1,367 and 1,436 people in 2005, between 1,523 and 1,561 people for 2010, and between 1,616 and 1,767 for 2015. ITEM: "A detailed land use and parcel analysis was completed to verify the existing and build out populations" for the City's W/WW System and are summarized below from the TetraTech report [Table 2-2 on page 2-4]. April 4, 2016 Area Existing Single Family Existing Mobile Homes Total Residential Housing Units Chokoloskee 170 300 470 Everglades City 250 130 380 Copeland 85 --- 85 Plantation 140 --- 140 TOTAL 645 430 1,075 ITEM: The TetraTech report suggested that the combination of 1,075 residential housing units, 2.08 persons per housing unit, and 33% unoccupied housing units (per 2000 census) accounts for an existing population of 1,475 persons which is very similar to the population estimates they reported previously. ITEM: The permanent population was adjusted by adding 20% in order to estimate the total of permanent and seasonal residents. In addition, an in -fill rate was assumed for the vacant lots, resulting in the projected total of permanent and seasonal population to be estimated - as summarized below per the TetraTech report [Table 2-4 on page 2-5]. Year Permanent plus Seasonal Population 2010 1,770 persons 2015 2,003 persons 2020 2,266 persons 2025 2,563 persons 2030 2,900 persons ITEM: [This population appears to be inflated.] Appendix A provides what appears to be information taken from a Water Use Permit application which seems to have used a population served for the water system of between 2,648 and 2,678 persons between 1999 and 2009 [table 9 on page 10 of Appendix A]. ITEM: Appendix A provides a month by month summary of "net quantity of finished water produced" for the period January 2009 thru January 2010. The monthly average finished water was between a low of 159,100 gallons per day (September 2009) and a high of 272,200 gallons per day (April 2009). The annual average was about 203,000 gallons per day or 74 million gallons per year [Refer to table 4 on page 4 of Appendix A]. April 4, 2016 ITEM: Divide the maximum monthly flow (272,200 gallons per day in April) by the 2010 total of permanent and seasonal population (1,770 people) yeilds 154 gallons per person per day. Divide the minimum monthly flow (159,100 gallons per day in September) by the 2010 permanent population (1,475 people) yeilds 108 gallons per person per day. The higher flow per capita during tourist season may be due to the influence of day -tourists visiting attractions (boating, fishing, etc.). TetraTech prepared a Utility Revenue Review for the City of Everglades City dated June 2011. The following is a summary prepared from this report with regard to identifying the service area and major components of the City's W/WW System. ITEM: "The City of Everglades City system provides service to the City, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee and Copeland." The 2000 Census population was provided by TetraTech [Attachment C]. Area Population (2000 Census) Everglades City 479 Plantation Island 202 Chokoloskee 404 Copeland 32 TOTAL 1,117 It appears that this 2000 population of 1,117 should be compared to the 2010 population of 1,475 provided in the 2010 TetraTech report as identified above. ITEM: The FY 2009 actual revenues reported for the City of Everglades City utility system were total Water Charges of $336,432/year and total Sewer Charges of $324,380, exclusive of various fees [page 3 of 131. ITEM: The current [at the time of the June 2011 report] typical water bill for the City of Everglades City was represented as being $13.00 per month, with each typical customer reported as using less than 3,000 gallons per month, which is the base rate charged for a residential customer [page 9 of 13]. The base charge for commercial customers was also reported as $13.00 per month. The consumption charge for water was reported as $4.00 per 1,000 gallons for both residential and commercial customers (for consumption greater than 3,000 gallons per month). ITEM: If we assume that there are approximately 1,000 total water customers and each is charged $13.00 per month then we get a total of [1,000 customers] x [$13.00/month] x [12 months/year] _ $156,000/year. This would suggest that the revenue generated from the consumption charge would be the difference between total revenue of $336,432/year and $156,000, or approximately $180,000 per year. At the rate of $4.00 per 1,000 gallons, this is equal to about 45 million 5 April 4, 2016 gallons per year billed above the amount included in the minimum charge of $13.00 per month. Assuming that approximately 300 customers out of a total 1,000 customers use over the 3,000 gallons per month minimum level then we might assume that these 300 customers are using an average on the order of 16,000 gallons per month, while the other 700 customers used on the order of 3,000 gallons per month. Without any details, this is the best we can do in estimating the possible number of customers served by this utility and consumption for a typical customer. This calculation was only done in order to attempt to better understand the number of customers served by the utility system. ITEM: The current [at the time of the June 2011 report] typical sewer bill for the City of Everglades City was represented as being $11.00 per month, which was the flat rate charged for each residential customer regardless of water usage [page 9 of 131. Commercial customers are charged $18.00 per month plus $4.25 per 1,000 gallons for the first 5,000 gallons of water usage and then only $0.60 per 1,000 gallons for water usage above that. Based on the limited information available, it is difficult to understand the likely relationship between reported annual sanitary sewer system revenues, and the likely member of sewer customers. Conclusions: The following can be concluded from the information summarized above. ➢ Existing housing units (2015), based on review of aerial photos and tax maps, plus windshield survey were estimated. Housing units are considered to be single family, multi -family and mobile homes (not in high density parks). RV/Park Models are those which appear to be in a high density park which is likely to have a centralized system of private water/sewer connections for the park. Future units were estimated for areas which either have previously platted vacant lots or areas with a reasonable possibility of future development. These estimates have been provided for use in estimating size of the utility system in the order of magnitude costs to upgrade and expand the system. ➢ At this point, no information has been found to suggest how many customer connections there are to the City's water system and wastewater system. The revenue collected versus the suggestion that most customers are residential and using minimal quantities of water does not necessarily work out as we understand these statements and financial data. This is especially the case for sewer revenues and rates. Regardless, we might estimate Housing Units RV/Park Models Future Housing Units Total Everglades City 400 190 250 840 Chokoloskee 160 420 100 680 Plantation 140 0 100 240 Copeland 100 0 40 140 TOTAL 800 610 490 1,900 ➢ At this point, no information has been found to suggest how many customer connections there are to the City's water system and wastewater system. The revenue collected versus the suggestion that most customers are residential and using minimal quantities of water does not necessarily work out as we understand these statements and financial data. This is especially the case for sewer revenues and rates. Regardless, we might estimate April 4, 2016 that the water system may have on the order of 1,000 customers and sewer system may have on the order of 600 customers. No conclusions have been made regarding existing and potential future water and sewer rates, other than a previous report by TetraTech indicates that rates were too low to support the expense of operating the existing system and that considerably higher rates may not be able to support likely levels of future debt service which will be needed to upgrade the system to meet minimum regulatory standards. ➢ It seems reasonable to assume that the City's water system may be serving a community with a total permanent and seasonal population on the order of 1,750 people. ➢ It seems reasonable to assume that the City's water system may be expanded to eventually serve as many as approximately 3,000 people (total of permanent and seasonal population). ➢ The typical residential customer is likely using less than 3,000 gallons per month of water and living in either manufactured housing or a mobile home. In some cases, the density of these housing units is rather high, although the service area is rather spread out over four generally independent communities which are tied together by water and wastewater transmission systems based on a centralized water treatment facility and centralized wastewater treatment facility. These backbone water and wastewater transmission lines are critically important for a variety of reasons. - Remainder of page intentionally left blank- April 4, 2016 Overview of the City of Everglades City's Water and Wastewater System — Infrastructure Water System TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime during 2010. This report provided information regarding the major infrastructure comprising the City's W/WW System. ITEM: The City's water system "provides service to the City of Everglades City, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and parts of Copeland." [page 3-1] ITEM: [This statement is for the previously existing situation.] "The existing system consists of a water treatment plant located in Copeland that includes three water supply wells, a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, aeration, and chloramination. The existing water treatment facility is rated for a maximum daily demand of 0.504 MGD." [page 3-1] ITEM: "From the main water treatment plant, water is pumped approximately 7 miles through an existing 8 -inch PVC water main to the City of Everglades City. The City has a water booster station located in the City of Everglades City that includes a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, chloramination and high service pumps." [page 3-1] ITEM: There were a number of deficiencies identified for the water system based on an inspection by TetraTech in April 2010. These deficiencies are not repeated here as a number of them have already been addressed (referred to as Phase I and Phase II). ITEM: In addition to what later became known and Phase I (wells) and Phase II (water treatment plant) improvements, TetraTech identified a category they called "Maintenance Improvements... In addition, it is recommended that the CIP include $500,000 every five years for water system maintenance or renewal and replacement projects. Typically these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments." The list of example projects suggest that the portions of the existing water treatment plant and booster pump station which were being utilized along with the Phase I and Phase 11 improvements are in need of significant repairs and due to financial limitations were addressed by spreading a total of $2,000,000 over a period of twenty years. [page 8-4] FDEP Permit Number 315455 -001 -WC was issued on January 31, 2013 to upgrade the existing water treatment plant. ITEM: "Upgrade to the existing water treatment plant. A new facility with enhanced treatment is needed because of poor well water quality and poor finished water quality. This project will add new treatment facilities including new Nanofiltration (NF) process trains, control system, chemical feed systems and interconnecting piping to the two new raw water wells." 8 April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The maximum day operation capacity of the NF plant is 465,000 gpd and consists of the following." 1. New sulfuric acid feed system 2. New scale inhibitor feed system 3. Two cartridge filters 4. Two membrane feed pumps 5. Dual Nanofiltration (NF) system (175 gpm each) 6. New hypochlorite feed system 7. New ammonium sulfate feed system 8. New sodium hydroxide feed system 9. New concentrate equalization tank (15,000 gallons) with pump (100 gpm) and air gap between the tank and the Camestown lift station. 10. Existing aerator with storage tank (500,000 gallons) and dual high service pumps (capacity of 350 gpm each) will be part of the new facility. 11. The facility is located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive in Copeland. ITEM: "Following completion of the water treatment facility improvements, it is recommended that the City of Everglades City water system be interconnected with the Lee Cypress Co-op. The Lee Cypress water system serves approximately 250 homes and is not in compliance with drinking water regulations." Lee Cypress Co-op Water System — FDEP Monthly Operation Report for PWSs Treating Raw Ground Water... ITEM: The monthly operation report for Lee Cypress Co-op water system [PWS Identification Number: 51100581 for the month of February 2016 was obtained from FDEP. It identifies a total population served of 250 people and a total flow treated of 292,218 gallons over 29 days, or an average of 10,000 gallons per day. ITEM: The per capita water consumption of 40 gallons per day per person is on the lower end of the spectrum, but to put into perspective would be equal to 2,400 gallons per month for a household of two people and is on the same order of magnitude reported for the City of Everglades City water system of less than 3,000 gallons per month per residential connection. Audit of City of Everglades City Grant Agreement, SFWMD, dated June 12, 2014, identifies the Phase II Water Treatment Plant project and funding sources. ITEM: "The District entered into a grant agreement for $750,000 with the City of Everglades City on January 25, 2014, to cost share in Phase II of a Water Supply System Improvement Project." [page 1] ITEM: "The City of Everglades City also received a commitment of $2.3 million from the Florida Department of Environmental 'Protection (FDEP) for the Phase II portion of the project." [page 1] Apri14, 2016 ITEM: "Phase I consisted of planning and constructing two well pumps and connecting the new wells at the existing water treatment plant." [page 1] ITEM: "Phase II primarily involves the design and construction of a new filtration membrane system and a concentrate disposal pipeline to the City of Everglades City wastewater collection system." [page 1] ITEM: "Phase I has been completed and Phase II of the project is in process." [page 1] ITEM: "Our review of various procurement documents indicated that the City of Everglades City evaluated four contracts for Phase II construction and awarded the contract to DN Higgins for $2.45 million, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder." [page 6] A telephone call to an employee of DN Higgins confirmed the following: ITEM: The project consisted of the construction of a new water treatment facility at the current location, along with the upgrading of two wastewater lift stations (Copeland and Carnestown), and miscellaneous repairs to the wastewater treatment plant (aeration basin and clarifier). ITEM: Following the telephone call, and consideration of various other documents, it appears that the upgrades to the two wastewater lift stations was likely necessary to increase the capacity for transporting wastewater flow from Copeland to Carnestown to the City of Everglades City in order to handle the additional flow generated by the new water treatment plant concentrate [estimated here as about 15 percent of the finished water produced each day]. Completion of the new Wells and Water Treatment Plant construction projects per FDEP permit. ITEM: FDEP letter of June 21, 2013 acknowledging completion of the two drinking water wells and granting of request to place the wells into operation. ITEM: A Certification of Construction Completion and request for clearance to place permitted PWS components into operation form was prepared by Professional Engineer, Amon Rony Joel, dated November 20, 2014, and submitted to FDEP for the Water Treatment Plant project. ITEM: FDEP letter of December 8, 2014 acknowledging receipt of certification that the water treatment plant was completed in accordance with Permit Number 315455- 001 -WC dated January 30, 2013. A Compliance Assistance Offer letter was sent by FDEP to The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Mayor, on January 5, 2015. ITEM: A Sanitary Survey Inspection Report for inspection on December 5, 2014 was sent along with an offer of assistance in resolving possible violations. The 10 April 4, 2016 Sanitary Survey included eleven "areas of concern" and two "recommendations." [pages 5 and 6] ITEM: Item #1 under "areas of concern" for the new water treatment plant was "It was stated that the recirculation pumps are currently not in operation... Please have these pumps repaired or replaced. [page 51 ITEM: Item #2 under "areas of concern" for the new water treatment plant was "The high service pumps #3 and #4 are nonfunctional at the booster station... Please repair or replace the pumps/controllers. [page 5] Windshield survey conducted on March 24, 2016. ITEM: Viewed from outside the fence, the Water Treatment Plant condition appears as would be expected based on the above statements regarding work recently having been completed. ITEM: Lee Cypress Co-op Water Treatment Plant was being attended by an individual [likely the operator] at the time we drove by. ITEM: There were fire hydrants generally throughout the Copeland area. There were fire hydrants generally throughout the City of Everglades City. There were a limited number of fire hydrants in Plantation Island. There were a limited number of fire hydrants in Chokoloskee. While no information was reviewed regarding the size of the potable water lines in these areas, it is anticipated that many of these fire hydrants may have limited flow capacity with the limitation being the size of water line providing water to them. Conclusions: ➢ It appears possible that in many areas the size of water lines may not be sufficient to meet today's fire protection needs (Collier County Development Standards). No review of record drawings or system schematics was performed. ➢ There are a large number of additional lots for which water service is likely to be needed in the future. Wastewater System TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime daring 2010. This report provided information regarding the major infrastructure comprising the City's W/WW System. ITEM: "The Everglades City wastewater treatment system provides service to the incorporated areas of Everglades City and to portions of Copeland and Chokaloskee. Plantation Island is not served by the Everglades City wastewater system; however, because the residents of Plantation Island utilize septic tanks, extending wastewater service to this area would be a benefit to the region." [page 4-11 11 April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The wastewater collection system includes approximately 245 grinder pump stations in the City of Everglades City, approximately 5 grinder pump stations in Chokoloskee, and two master pump stations (one in Chokoloskee and one in Copeland). All existing grinder pumps were manufactured by E/One, and all have a similar configuration with a check valve in the wetwell. Approximately fourteen (14) of the existing grinder pump stations are duplex and all other are simplex design. The collection system is fairly new and is generally in good condition." [page 4-1] Florida Rural Water Association— Undated letter from William F. Archebelle, Fiscal Sustainability Analyst, to Mayor Sammy Hamilton, City of Everglades City. ITEM: "There appears to be minimal gravity sewer in the collection system and our analysis of onsite manholes showed them to be in relatively good condition. Analysis of the actual gravity mains should be conducted via televising and smoke testing, but relatively little infiltration or inflow was noted during the evaluation of the gravity manholes." ITEM: "The collection system evaluation indicated that the majority of the lift stations in the City, with the exception of the following, are operating with only one functional pump or only one pump in actually place: • Everglades Isle (Both stations with two functional pumps) • Seaboard Villas • Barron Station • The Elementary School • Lake Cypress" ITEM: "FDEP regulations require that all lift stations have a minimum of two (2) operable pumps to provide redundant service should one pump fail. Not addressing this situation could eventually result in additional FDEP compliance action. A detailed analysis of each lift station in the City is included in the attached evaluation forms with specific information on missing or failed pumps and other issues that may need to be addressed." [No evaluation forms were provided with this letter so none were able to be reviewed.] ITEM: "A list of stations with major issues other than failed or missing pumps is included below as these facilities have the potential for , or evidence of, Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) events: 1. The Chokoloskee Island Master Lift Station was out of service, with all power tripped to the control panel. It is our understanding from discussions with field personnel that this is not an unusual occurrence. With no power to the control panel to activate the high water alarm the station was overflowing directly to the adjacent waterway, resulting in a Sanitary Sewer Overflow event (SSO). We informed your personnel that this event must be reported to the FDEP and appropriate remediation actions be taken in accordance with FDEP regulations. 12 April 4, 2016 When power was restored and the station pumps exercised, it was found that one pump is out of service. The second pump needs to be pulled, repaired, and returned to service as soon as possible. FRWA recommends the control panel for the station be repaired at the earliest opportunity, as failure of the station results in direct introduction of sewage into the environment in violation of State Law. We also recommend stairs or a ladder and platform be installed to provide access to the control panel as it is elevated for flood protection and is too high to be accessed from the ground. 2. The Estuary North Lift Station invert does not appear to be properly sealed into the wetwell and shows evidence of groundwater infiltration. The invert should be sealed, and any sand/soils should be cleaned from the bottom of the wetwell. Pump No. 2 was out of service. The Partners Cove Lift Station pump discharge is leaking between the wetwell and the valve pit. The surrounding ground is saturated with raw sewage and the ground is beginning to subside. This potential SSO situation should be addressed immediately. Additionally, there is no Pump No. 2 installed in the station." ITEM: "We recognize the WWTF is near the end of its service life and ultimately needs to be replaced, but until that time, you are still required to operate in accordance with Florida Administrative Code and FDEP regulations. With that in mind, a list of issues noted at the plant, and potential regulatory issues are as follows:" ➢ "During our site visit it was observed that there is a significant lack of maintenance record keeping at the treatment plant. Several tanks and related equipment have deteriorated to the point of potential failure; including the aeration basins, clarifiers, and digesters as well as traveling bridge filter in which was out of service. Several blowers were no longer functioning and the Emergency generator does not appear to be operable. Much of the noted deterioration appears to be a direct result of a lack of property onsite maintenance." ➢ "It was also observed that recordkeeping was very poor. Daily log entries were very minimal as it pertains to operational controls, adjustments, and maintenance of the facility. All records were improperly filed in a shipping box without any regard to organization. The laboratory chemical tracking and inventory does not appear to be performed or documented." ➢ "...The Operating Protocols has not been update nor submitted along with the renewal for permit application." ➢ "...The operation and maintenance records are not being documented and needs to be updated and submitted along with the permit renewal." ➢ "...FAC 62-600.405 Capacity and Analysis Report has not been updated and submitted." 13 April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The wastewater treatment facility reuse system is not currently operating in compliance with State standards as required by Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rule 62-610." ➢ "...The sand filters were not in operation and are not functioning. As part of the reuse system filtration must be met to comply with TSS results below 5.0 mg/1. At the time of the visit the turbidity reading was over 20.0 NTH, which would equate to well over a 5.0 mg/1 TSS." ➢ "...Continuous monitoring of turbidity shall be applied to the operating protocols as a means of controlling operation of treatment facilities to ensure that only acceptable quality reclaimed water is released to the reuse system or to system storage." ➢ "...The proposed monitoring equipment, chlorine, pH and turbidity shall be calibrated according to the requirements." ITEM: "Parts of the treatment system (specifically the sand filters and several blowers) were not in service. The permittee of any reuse or land application system shall be responsible notification for periods of inactivation or abandonment of equipment. The permittee shall give the Department written notice at least 60 days before inactivation or abandonment of a reuse or land application system and shall specify what steps will be taken to safeguard public health and safety." ITEM: "Cross -connection control program requirements are contained in Chapter 62- 555, F.A.C. (c). As part of the permit application, the reclaim water systems must comply with a cross connection control plan. This plan is developed to ensure that there is no potential for any reclaim water or nondrinking water wells to connect with the drinking water distribution system." Windshield survey conducted on March 24, 2016. ITEM: The wastewater lift station at Camestown has a new generator and appears consistent (without entry) with the statement by DN Higgins employee that the lift station was rebuilt recently. ITEM: The wastewater lift station at Copeland, near the Lee Cypress Co-op Water Treatment Plant, has a new generator and appears consistent (without entry) with the statement by DN Higgins employee that the lift station was rebuilt recently. ITEM: There is a second wastewater lift station in Copeland and it has a generator. ITEM: It appears that portions of the City of Everglades City are still provided collection service by gravity sewers and lift stations. No lift stations were accessed and no manholes opened as this was a windshield survey only. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with a single pump station serving each single family home in most cases. 14 April 4, 2016 ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a single commercial establishment. It was not obvious whether or not the size of the pumps or wetwell of the pump station for larger commercial establishments was any different from the standard pump station typically used for a single family residence. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a group (number unknown) of RV units or mobile homes. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a motel or similar business which would likely have a large number of plumbing fixtures. ITEM: It appears that there are a number of grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with a single pump station serving a multi- family building or group of buildings which may have as many as eight to sixteen (possibly more) residential units which would likely have a large number of plumbing fixtures. ITEM: Visual observation seems to confirm statements made by others that Plantation Island is not served by sanitary sewers of any kind and that this is an area of high population density with high water table being served by septic tank systems. ITEM: Visual observation seems to confirm statements made by others that most of Chokoloskee is not served by sanitary sewers of any kind and that much of this is an area of high population density with high water table being served by septic tank systems. Conclusions: ➢ It appears that some areas may have appropriate level of sanitary sewer collection system, while other areas appear to possibly have sub -standard level of sanitary sewer collection system. Of significant concern, it appears that a single grinder pump station (believed to only have a small wetwell and single pump) may be serving more than the typical single family residence or small cluster of residences more typical of these systems. ➢ Once the number of fixtures being provided service by a single grinder pump station (typical of that used for a single family residence) reaches a certain level, it is suggested that a single pump grinder pump station is no longer sufficient. [The current analysis did not attempt to determine a regulatory limit or recommendation in this regard, although it appears that in many cases this is a concern]. ➢ FDEP has a guidance and standards manual specifically for non-conventional/altemative sewer systems which includes pressure sewers. It is suggested this manual, as well as meeting with FDEP, eventually be used to assess the existing system with regard to reliability and whether or not the City's system meets minimum standards. ➢ No attempt has been made in this very limited assignment to quantify the degree of the problems with the existing system, although it is believed, from review of various 15 April 4, 2016 documents that many of the lift stations throughout the collection system are in need of major repair or replacement. There are two large areas — Plantation Island and Chokoloskee — where there are no existing_ sanitary sewer system and where such a system will almost certainly be needed at some point in time. Summary of Need for Significant Upgrades and Expansion Water System — Transmission System Upgrades ➢ The size and capacity, as well as the condition, of the existing transmission pipeline system which interconnects Copeland, City of Everglades City, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee is unknown. ➢ In order to meet future demands as well as eventually provide minimum fire flows throughout the system, it is assumed that as much as approximately 60,000 to 70,000 lineal feet of water transmission mains may eventually be needed. This may be replacement of older pipelines or paralleling of existing pipelines. ➢ It is assumed that installation of fire hydrants to meet Collier County development standards will be needed, possibly resulting in larger water main size requirements. ➢ Upgrades to the City of Everglades City water booster pump station are anticipated as eventually being needed. This assumes that the combination of sufficient upgrades to the transmission system and upgrades to this pump station would be sufficient to provide the necessary flow and pressure to Plantation Island and Chokoloskee to serve both potable and fire protection needs. Water System — Distribution System Upgrades ➢ The size and condition of the existing distribution system pipelines is unknown. It is assumed, that at some point, much of the existing system may need to be replaced. This would include fire hydrants, water serve meter assemblies, and back flow prevention devices. Water System — Water Supply Upgrades ➢ Two additional water supply wells will likely eventually be required in order to handle future anticipated needs as well as minimum level of reliability. Water Treatment Plant Upgrades ➢ One additional water treatment process train will likely eventually be needed in order to handle future projected needs, while also providing the ability to meet an acceptable percentage of anticipated demand with one process train offline. ➢ Upgrades are anticipated to be required to a variety of other process equipment as well as all electrical systems in order to meet Collier County typical standards. ➢ Computerized control and monitoring system typical of Collier- County standards will likely be required. 16 April 4, 2016 Upgrades to pressure sewer system ➢ Installation of additional simplex grinder pump stations (or upgrading to a duplex pump station) is anticipated as being required for areas where it appears that too many residential units are connected to a single grinder pump station. ➢ Addition of telemetry system to each grinder pump station is anticipated in order to send all alarms to a centralized monitoring location. ➢ In order to meet FDEP requirements for pressurized sewer systems, sufficient spare parts (grinder pumps and accessories) will need to be purchased and maintained. FDEP requires a minimum of 3% spare grinder pumps for systems which use simplex pumping units, as well as sufficient maintenance staff to be able to change out a failed grinder pump on short notice. ➢ It is assumed that for those areas of the sanitary sewer system which remain on gravity type sewer system, the sewer lines may eventually require slip -lining, manholes lined, and significant upgrades to the existing conventional lift stations. This may include new pumps, controls, and telemetry systems. Alternatively, the gravity system may eventually be abandoned and new pressure sewer system installed as replacement. ➢ Installation of pressure sewer systems to serve those areas which currently do not have sanitary sewer service. It is assumed that in single family neighborhoods that each grinder pump station would serve a single household or at most two households with the unit placed on the common lot -line. It is assumed that in multi -family neighborhoods that each grinder pump station may be able to serve up to four housing units. [This would need to be verified based on analysis of fixture counts and a County standard regarding use of simplex grinder pump stations and consistent with FDEP rules]. Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement ➢ The existing wastewater treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life. An entirely new treatment facility is needed. It is assumed that the effluent disposal method will be reuse of reclaimed water on residential lots, as well as along City streets, at the airport, at the School, and at parks. The effluent quality and system reliability will be limiting factors. ➢ Due to the presence of adjacent environmentally sensitive areas, it is suggested that the wastewater treatment facility be designed for some degree of nitrogen removal as well as have the ability to include some degree of phosphorus removal if it is ever required by FDEP. ➢ In order to provide for the highest quality reclaimed water possible, the use of MBR technology to provide assurances of meeting TSS, turbidity, and coliform permit requirements for reuse may be the necessary standard. This type of higher cost system may also be necessary due to site space limitations. ➢ The proposed wastewater treatment facility would need to include sufficient flow equalization in order to minimize facility overload during rainy season events typical of coastal communities. ➢ The proposed wastewater treatment facility would include a minimum one -day volume of flow Reject Storage Tank (consider two-day reject storage tank) plus a minimum of one - day volume of flow Reuse Storage Tank (consider two-day reuse storage tank) in order to operate the facility while providing assurances of always meeting public health standards for water going to the reuse system. 17 April 4, 2016 Reclaimed Water System ➢ The reclaimed water system should include a minimum three-day volume of flow storage pond (consideration should be made for five day storage pond) to allow for storage of reclaimed water produced on rain days and periods of lower rates of residential irrigation on lawns of low lying elevation areas. (The FDEP rules provide for the methodology for assessment of the number of days of storage volume necessary.) ➢ Reclaimed water pump station should be sized to meet projected peak irrigation demands (consideration should be made for the ability of pumping the maximum daily flow over a six to eight hour period of irrigation each night/early morning). ➢ Install new reclaimed water pipelines throughout the entire City of Everglades City. ➢ FDEP is likely to require a deep injection well or other alternative effluent disposal system for back-up of the reuse system. It may be possible to install the reuse system and to demonstrate to FDEP that all of the effluent produced is utilized for irrigation. This demonstration may postpone the need for the deep injection well, although may not totally avoid having to eventually construct a deep injection well. ➢ Possibly expand the coverage area for irrigation using reclaimed water to Plantation Island or Chocoloskee in order to dispose of all reclaimed water produced during wet weather periods. This would likely require installation of an alternative water supply system to meet the dry season demand for irrigation customers. [This would be a system more similar to that of Port of the Islands which is a 100% reuse system.] -Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 18 April 4, 2016 Order of magnitude Estimate of Costs to Upgrade and Expand the existing systems. The existing water system is estimated to supply potable water to approximately eight hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. Based on the assumptions provided herein, it is assumed that approximately five hundred additional residential housing units may be served by this utility through build -out, with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent. The existing sanitary sewer system is estimated to serve approximately five hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. It is assumed that the sewer system will be expanded to serve all of Plantation Island and all of Chokoloskee accounting for an additional eight hundred residential housing units on the system through build -out, with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent. No attempt to estimate the rate of population growth or timing for extending sanitary sewer service to existing areas is included in this analysis. The following is an order of magnitude estimate of costs which may be reasonably anticipated in the event that the City of Everglades City system was to be expanded and upgraded as identified herein. Based on the limited review and analysis which was the scope of this work assignment, the following breakdown of potential future expenditures is provided below. The higher end of the range for each major system component assumes both build -out of the system to serve the number of customers identified above as well providing a system meeting standards typical of those for the Collier County Public Utilities system. ➢ Water Supply ➢ Water Treatment ➢ Water Transmission ➢ Water Distribution ➢ Wastewater Collection ➢ Wastewater Transmission ➢ Wastewater Treatment ➢ Wastewater Reuse ➢ Wastewater Disposal ➢ Telemetry and Control Range of Total Potential Cost $ 0.5 million to $ 1 million Note 1 $ 1 million to $ 2.5 million Note 2 $ 2 million to $ 5 million Note 3 $ 3 million to $ 8 million Note 4 $ 6 million to $ 9 million Note 5 $ 3 million to $ 5 million Note 6 $10 million to $12 million Note 7 $ 1.5 million to $ 2.5 million Note 8 $ 1 million to $ 6 million Note 9 $ 2 million to $ 4 million Note 10 $30 million to $55 million NOTES: 1. This assumes two new wells are installed and upgrades to the existing wells. 2. This assumes installation of one additional water treatment train along with upgrades to the remainder of components of the existing system, including possible expansion of the building and electrical systems. 3. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement or paralleling of the pipelines forming the "back- bone" system connecting the four communities anywhere from approximately one-third of the length to the entire length of the existing system. [Order of magnitude estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs.] 4. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement of much of the existing potable water system plus the extension of service to new customers. [Order of magnitude estimate of $6,500 per residential housing unit which is typical of costs experienced by Collier County in water system upgrades for Isle of Capri, Riverwood Estates Mobile Home, Naples Mobile Home Park, and Naples Park (including anticipated price escalation to current project costs).] Range in cost provides for predominately new customers up to projects including new customers plus major system upgrade project.] 19 April 4, 2016 5. This assumes extension of sanitary sewer service to all water customers at an order of magnitude cost of $6,500 per residential housing unit using a pressurized sewer system, plus possible need to upgrade much of the old systems (both gravity and pressurized) using a pressurized sewer system with one simplex grinder pump station per house or a limited number of equivalent residential connections per simplex grinder pump station. 6. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement or paralleling of the pipelines forming the "back- bone" system connecting the three communities currently on the sewer system plus extending service to Plantation Island. [Order of magnitude estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs, plus the cost to upgrade existing lift stations to Collier County standards plus construction of two additional lift stations for service to new customers.] 7. This assumes that a totally new wastewater treatment plant is needed and that it will need to produce high quality reclaimed water suitable for residential irrigation as well as have low nourient levels to minimize concerns for irrigation runoff and water percolating into the groundwater from impacting the sensitive environment surrounding the developed areas. 8. This includes extension of irrigation pipelines through the City of Everglades City, including a lined storage pond for wet weather storage. [Order of magnitude cost estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs, plus cost to construct storage and pumping systems.] 9. This line item includes either any unforeseen systems which may be required by FDEP to assure compliance with regulatory requirements associated with effluent disposal not covered in another line item. It is possible that FDEP may require an alternative effluent disposal system such as a deep injection well. 10. The Collier County Public Utilities system incorporates a telemetry system for monitoring and control of their systems in order to provide operation of their systems. [Estimated at between $1,000 and $2,000 per customer.] -Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 20 April 4, 2016 Some Considerations regarding 100 percent use of Reclaimed Water The Port of the Islands Community Improvement District is located approximately ten miles west of Carnestown. Geographically, this community is similar to that of Everglades City as an isolated area of development totally surrounded by natural wetlands and water. The Port of the Islands Community uses a 100% reclaimed water system (wastewater effluent and water treatment plant concentrate) for irrigation which is supplemented using raw well water. Since implementation of this system, there has never been a need to store excess reclaimed water or use an alternate means of disposal. The following observations from Port of the Islands will assist in comparing to the City of Everglades City potential effluent disposal situation. ➢ Irrigation is provided to approximately 120 developable acres of which approximately 80% currently developed. The remaining approximately 20% is currently vacant lots. Therefore, it can be estimated that approximately 96 gross acres are likely being irrigated at this time. ➢ Irrigation rates fluctuate between dry season (April) and wet season (September). Over the past few years approximately 5 million gallons of irrigation water was used during the low flow irrigation month and approximately 8 million gallons/month of irrigation water was used during a high flow irrigation month. ➢ The approximate gross irrigation factor is approximately 1,700 gallons per gross acre per day [5 million gallons/month over 96 gross acres divided by 30 days/month]. ➢ Assuming approximately one-third of gross area is irrigated, yields an approximate net irrigation factor (application rate) of approximately 5,000 gallons per net acre per day. ➢ Converting to an approximate application rate [43,560 sq. ft./acre, 7.48 gallons/cu. ft., 7 days per week, 12 inches per foot] yields approximately 1.3 inches per week for the summer wet season months. ➢ It is suggested that due to differences in development density that an approximate gross irrigation factor of approximately 1,200 gallons per gross acre per day could be used in order to estimate potential demand for reclaimed water for a residential irrigation system for the City of Everglades City. [This certainly needs to be investigated further, although should represent an order of magnitude estimate based on a similar system. The following is an estimate of potential disposal capacity using irrigation of essentially the entire city limits within the City of Everglades City. ➢ It is estimated that there are likely on the order of between 300 and 350 gross acres which may be suitable for irrigation within the City of Everglades City as development continues on currently vacant land in the City. ➢ Assuming 1,200 gallons per gross acre per day, results in potential capacity for disposal of between 360,000 and 420,000 gallons per day of reclaimed water (during summer months). This is approximately the amount of wastewater effluent (including water treatment plant concentrate) which may be expected to be generated during the off-peak season for the projected 2030 population. ➢ Since the peak tourist season corresponds with the dry season, the higher production of reclaimed water from treatment of wastewater, combined with the higher production of water treatment plant concentrate, would generally be offset with higher irrigation applications rates typical during dry season compared to wet season. 21 April 4, 2016 ➢ A significant difference between the Port of the Islands system and that contemplated for the City of Everglades City system is Port of the Islands residents produce all of the reclaimed water which is available for irrigation on their own lawns and along roadsides. The system being considered here for the City of Everglades City would consist of reclaimed water produced by a population on the order of three times larger than the community over which the reclaimed water would be irrigated. This assumes that all of Copeland, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee would eventually be sewered, and irrigation using reclaimed water would only occur on property in the City of Everglades City. Therefore, we should not carry the analogy between Port of the Islands and the City of Everglades City too far at this level of analysis. ➢ In the event that the reclaimed water irrigation system was to potentially be extended to Plantation Island and/or Chokoloskee, there would likely need to be a supplemental water source developed in order to meet customer demands during the. dry season. The cost of such a supplemental water system, combined with cost of extending the reuse system to more customers, may potentially offset the need for a deep injection well. ➢ For the City of Everglades City system, it is likely a significant size wet -weather reclaimed water storage pond maybe needed and may also potentially offset the need for (or defer) a deep injection well. Such a storage pond would likely only be needed during the high rainfall period each year and would likely be totally dry the remainder of the year. -Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 22 April 4, 2016 Sample Collier County water distribution system replacement projects costs Isle of Capri Phase I and Phase II Cost—Phase I $1,424,000 (2010 adjusted price) $1,800,000 (estimated 2016 price) Cost — Phase II $1,784,000 (2010 adjusted price) $2,200,000 (estimated 2016 price) Combined Cost $4,000,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 550 Approximate Cost per housing unit $7,000 to $7,500 each Riverwood Estates [Mobile Home] Cost $1,467,000 (2011 adjusted price) $1,800,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 290 Approximate Cost per housing unit $6,000 to $6,500 each Naples Mobile Home Park Cost $ 916,000 (2012 adjusted price) $1,100,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 178 Approximate Cost per housing unit $6,000 to $6,500 each Naples Park Cost $2,084,000 (2013 adjusted price) $2,400,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 320 Approximate Cost per housing unit $7,500 each 23 FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 2970 Wellington Circle • Tallahassee, FL 32309-6885 Telephone: 850-668-2746 - Fax: 850.893.4581 Wastewater Asset Management Plan Timothy Banks FDEP CWSRF 3900 Commonwealth Blvd: MS 3505 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Ref: Everglades City Asset Management Onsite Evaluation Mr. Banks, When conducting our evaluation of the Everglades City Wastewater Utility, numerous issues were found in the plant and the collection system that directly impact their ability to provide safe wastewater collection and treatment as well as their ability to comply with State and Federal regulations for the same. We are providing a basic list of issues we identified while onsite for your information. Our findings are outlined below and in the attached evaluation forms: Wastewater Treatment Facility: We recognize the WWTF is near the end of its service life and ultimately needs to be replaced, but until that time, the City is still required to operate in accordance with Florida Administrative Code and FDEP regulations. With that in mind a list of issues noted at the lant and potential regulatory issues are as follows: , P ,. p � ry During our site visit it was observed that there is a significant lack of maintenance record keeping at the treatment plant.. Several tanks and related equipment have deteriorated to the point of potential failure; including the aeration basins, clarifiers, and digesters as well as traveling bridge filter in which was out of service. Several blowers were no longer functioning and the Emergency generator does not appear to be operable, Much of the noted deterioration appears to be a direct result of a lack of property onsite maintenance. It was also observed that recordkeeping was very poor. Daily log entries were very minimal as it pertains to operational controls, adjustments, and maintenance of the facility. All records were improperly filed in a shipping box without any regard to organization. The laboratory chemical tracking and inventory does not appear to be performed or documented. 1. The wastewater treatment facility reuse system is not currently operating in compliance with State standards as required by Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rule 62-610. 2. There does not appear to bean Operations Manual for the facility available for review. 3. The operation and maintenance records are not being documented and needs to be updated and submitted along with the permit renewal. 4. The traveling bridge sand filters were not in operation and are not functioning. It is questionable whether it is feasible to repair them considering the level of deterioration. F As part of the reuse system filtration must be met to comply with TSS results below 5.0 mg/1. At the time of the visit the turbidity reading was over a 20.0 NTU, which would equate to well over a 5.0 mg/1 TSS, 5. Several treatment blowers were not in service. 6. No valid Capacity and Analysis Report was available for the facility. Wastewater Collection System: There appears to be minimal gravity sewer in the collection system and our analysis of onsite manholes showed them to be in relatively good condition. Analysis of the actual gravity mains should be conducted via televising and smoke testing, but relatively little infiltration or inflow was noted during the evaluation of the gravity manholes. The collection system evaluation indicated that the majority of the lift stations in the city, with the exception of the following, are operating with only one functional pump or only one pump in actually place: • Everglades Isle (Both stations with two fimctional pumps) ® Luwc% e` i mx Cum • Seaboard Villas • Barron Station • The Elementary School • Lake Cypress FDEP regulations require that all lift stations have a minimum of two (2) operable pumps to provide redundant service should one pump fail. Not addressing this situation could eventually result in additional FDEP compliance action. A detailed analysis of each lift station in the city is included in the attached evaluation forms with specific information on missing or failed pumps and other 'issues that may need to be addressed. A list of stations with major issues other than failed or missing pumps is included below as these facilities have the potential for, or evidence of, Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) events: 1. The Cholcoloskee Island Master Lift: station was out of service, with all power tripped to the control panel. It is our understanding from discussions with field personnel that this is not an unusual occurrence. With no power to the control panel to activate the high water alarm, the station was overflowing directly to the adjacent waterway, resulting in a Sanitary Sewer Overflow event (SSO). We informed City personnel that this event must be reported to the FDEP and appropriate remediation actions be taken in accordance with FDEP regulations. When power was restored and the station pumps exercised, it was found that one pump is out of service. The second pump needs to be pulled, repaired, and returned to service as soon as possible. FRWA recommends the control panel for the station be repaired at the earliest opportunity, as failure of the station results in direct introduction of sewage into the environment in violation of State Law. We also recommend stairs or a ladder and platform be installed to provide access to the control panel as it is elevated for flood protection and is too high to be accessed from the ground. 2. The Estuary North Lift Station invert does not appear to be properly sealed into the wetwell and shows evidence of groundwater infiltration. The invert should be sealed, and any sand/soils should be cleaned from the bottom of the wetwell. Pump No. 2 was out of service. 3. The Partners Cove Lift Station pinup discharge is leaking between the wetwell and the valve pit. The surrounding ground is saturated with raw sewage and the ground is beginning to subside. This potential SSO situation should be addressed immediately. Additionally, there is no Pump No. 2 installed in the station. All lift station and manhole evaluation forms prepared from our onsite evaluation are attached to this letter to assist in addressing the issues identified. Please let us know if any additional information is needed and we will be happy to assist as needed. Sincerely, Willliam F. Archebelle FRWA Fiscal Sustainability Analyst w/ attachments c.c. John Sowersby, CWSRF Gary Williams, FRWA Troy Cassidy, FRWA FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 2970 Wellington Circle • Tallahassee, FL 32309-6885 Telephone: 850-668.2746 - Fax: 850-893-4581 Wastewater Asset Management Plan City of Everglades City PO Box 110 Everglades City, Collier County Florida 34139 Mayor Sammy Hamilton Ref: Wastewater Asset Management Plan Mayor Hamilton, FRWA has been notified by the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) division of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) that based upon the current wastewater utility rate structure in Everglades City, the municipality will not qualify for CWSRF assistance. As the wastewater Asset Management Plan is a requirement of the CWSRF funding program, it is no longer needed by the City, and we have been instructed to cease work on the Plan. Troy Cassidy and I appreciate the time you and your staff dedicated to this process, and thank you for your cooperation. This letter to outlines our findings, and provides information to assist you in addressing the issues encountered. When conducting our evaluation of the Utility, numerous issues were found in the plant and the collection system that directly impact your ability to provide safe wastewater collection and treatment as well as your ability to comply with State and Federal regulations for the same. We are providing a basic list of issues we identified while onsite for your information, and want to remind you that FRWA remains available to provide operational and other assistance to you as a member City, Our findings are outlined below and in the attached evaluation forms: Wastewater Treatment Facility: We recognize the W WTF is near the end of its service life and ultimately needs to be replaced, but until that time, you are still required to operate in accordance with Florida Administrative Code and FDEP regulations. With that in mind, a list of issues noted at the plant, and potential regulatory issues are as follows: During our site visit it was observed that there is a significant.lack of maintenance record keeping at the treatment plant. Several tanks and related equipment have deteriorated to the point of potential failure; including the aeration basins, clarifiers, and digesters as well as traveling bridge filter in which was out of service. Several blowers were no longer functioning and the Emergency generator does not appear to be. operable. Much of the noted deterioration appears to be a direct result of a lack of property onsite maintenance. It was also observed that recordkeeping was very poor. Daily log entries were very minimal as it pertains to operational controls, adjustments, and maintenance of the facility, All records were improperly filed in a shipping box without any regard to organization, The laboratory chemical tracking and inventory does not appear to be performed or documented. 1. The wastewater treatment facility reuse system is not currently operating in compliance with State standards as required by Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rule 62-610. 2. Specific subsections within 62-610 should have immediate action areas follows: -r; 62-610.320 (6) Updated Operating Protocol — 1 The Operating Protocols has not been update nor submitted along with the renewal for permit application, Operation and Maintenance Manual, An operation and maintenance manual or an addition to the treatment plant operation and maintenance manual or stand-alone instructional booklet, The reuse/land application system operation and maintenance instructions shall provide the operator with the Following: (A) . an adequate description and schedule of routine reclaimed water or effluent application rates and cycles involved with the system; (B) operation procedures (including any notification and reporting requirements of appropriate agencies) during adverse climatic conditions and maintenance of equipment; (C) schedules for harvesting and crop removal; routine maintenance required for the continued design performance of the system; (D) ground water monitoring procedures and schedules; (E) listings of spare parts to have on hand; (F) and any other information essential to the operation of the system in accordance with the requirements of this rule. 62-610,320 (5) (a) Operation and Maintenance Requirements for Operating Protocol The operation and maintenance records are not being documented and needs to be updated and submitted (` along with the permit renewal, 1. An operating protocol is a document which describes how a domestic wastewater facility is to be operated to ensure that only reclaimed water that meets applicable standards is released to a reuse system. It is a detailed set of instructions for the operators of the facilities. It may be part of the operation and maintenance manual or it may be a separate document. 2. The operating protocol shall address the following; (A) The criteria used to make continuous determinations of the acceptability of the reclaimed water being produced. This shall include the setpoints for parameters measured by continuous on-line monitoring equipment, (B) The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when substandard water is being produced. (C)The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when the treatment facility returns to normal operation and acceptable quality reclaimed water is again being produced. (D) Procedures to be followed during a period when an operator is not present at the treatment facility. (E) The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when the operator returns to the treatment facility following an unattended period. 62-610.460 Treatment and disinfection (3) Filtration The sand filters were not in operation and are not functioning. As part of the reuse system filtration must be met to comply with TSS results below 5.0 mg/l. At the time of the visit the turbidity reading was over a 20.0 NTU, which would equate to well over a 5.0 mg/l TSS. Continuous monitoring of turbidity shall be applied to the operating protocols as a means of controlling operation of treatment facilities to ensure that only acceptable quality reclaimed water is released to the reuse system or to system storage. The proposed monitoring equipment, chlorine, PH and turbidity shall be calibrated according to the requirements. 62.610.463 (1), (2) Monitoring and Reporting Parts of the treatment system (specifically the sand filters and several blowers) were not in service. The permittee of any reuse or land application system shall be responsible notification for periods of hiactivation or abandonment of equipment, The permittee shall give the Department written notice at least 60 days before inactivation or abandonment of a reuse or land application system and shall specify what steps will be taken to safeguard public health and safety, 3. Cross -connection control program requirements are contained in Chapter 62-555, F.A.C. (c) As part of the permit application, the reclaim water systems must comply with a cross connection control plan .This plan is developed to ensure that there is no potential for any reclaim water or non drinking water wells to connect with the drinking water distribution system, 4. FAC 62-600.405 Capacity and Analysis Report has not been updated and submitted. Specific subsections within 62-610 that immediate actions should be taken areas follows 62-610.320 (6) Updated Operating Protocol— The Operating Protocols has not been update nor submitted along with the renewal for permit application. Operation and Maintenance Manual. An operation and maintenance manual or an addition to the treatment plant operation and maintenance manual or stand-alone instructional booklet, The reuse/land application system operation and maintenance instructions shall provide the operator with the Following: (G) an adequate description and schedule of routine reclaimed water or effluent application rates and cycles involved with the system; (ITJ operation procedures (including any notification and reporting requirements of appropriate agencies) during adverse climatic conditions and maintenance of equipment; (I) schedules for harvesting and crop removal; routine maintenance required for the continued design performance of the system; (J) ground water monitoring procedures and schedules; (IC) listings of spare parts to have on hand; (L) and any other information essential to the operation of the system in accordance with the requirements of this rule. 62-610.320 (5) (a) Operation and Maintenance Requirements for Operating Protocol The operation and maintenance records are not being documented and needs to be updated and submitted along with the permit renewal. 3. An operating protocol is a document which describes how a domestic wastewater facility is to be operated to ensure that only reclaimed water that meets applicable standards is released to a reuse system. It is a detailed set of instructions for the operators of the facilities. It may be part of the operation and maintenance manual or it may be a separate document. 4. The operating protocol shall address the following; (A) The criteria used to make continuous determinations of the acceptability of the reclaimed water being produced. This shall include the setpoints for parameters measured by continuous on-line monitoring equipment. (B) The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when substandard water is being produced. (C) The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when the treatment facility returns to normal operation and acceptable quality reclaimed water is again being produced. (D) Procedures to be followed during a period when an operator is not present at the treatment facility. (E) The physical steps and procedures to be followed by the operator when the operator . returns to the treatment facility following an unattended period. 62-610.460 Treatment and disinfection (3) Filtration The sand filters were not in operation and are not functioning. As part of the reuse system filtration must be met to comply with TSS results below 5.0 mg/I. At the time of the visit the turbidity reading was over a 20.0 NTU, which would equate to well over a 5.0 mg/l TSS. Continuous monitoring of turbidity shall be applied to the operating protocols as a means of controlling operation of treatment facilities to ensure that only acceptable quality reclaimed water is released to the reuse system or to system storage. The proposed monitoring equipment, chlorine, PH and turbidity shall be calibrated according to the requirements. 62.610.463 (1), (2) Monitoring and Reporting Parts of the treatment system specifically the sand filters and several blowers were not in service. The permittee of any reuse or land application system shall be responsible notification for periods of inactivation or abandonment of equipment. The permittee shall give the Department written notice at least 60 days before inactivation or abandonment of a reuse or land application system and shall specify what steps will be taken to safeguard public health and safety. (` 5. Cross -connection control program requirements are contained in Chapter 62-555, F.A.C. (c) As part of the permit application, the reclaim water systems must comply with a cross connection control plan .This plan is developed to ensure that there is no potential for any reclahn water or non drinking water wells to connect with the drinking water distribution system. 6. FAC 62-600.405 Capacity and Analysis Report has not been updated and submitted. Wastewater Collection System: There appears to be minimal gravity sewer in the collection system and our analysis of onsite manholes showed them to be in relatively good condition, Analysis of the actual gravity mains should be conducted via televising and smoke testing, but relatively little infiltration or inflow was noted during the evaluation of the gravity manholes, The collection system evaluation indicated that the majority of the lift stations in the city, with the exception of the following, are operating with only one functional pump or only one pump in actually place: • Everglades Isle (Both stations with two functional pumps) • Seaboard Villas • Barron Station • The Elementary School • Lake Cypress FDEP regulations require that all lift stations have a minimum of two (2) operable pumps to provide redundant service should one pump fail, Not addressing this situation could eventually result in additional FDEP compliance action, A detailed analysis of each lift station in the city is included in the attached evaluation forms with specific information on missing or failed pumps and other issues that may need to be addressed. A list of stations with major issues other than failed or missing pumps is included below as these facilities have the potential for, or evidence of, Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) events; 1, The Chokoloskee Island Master Lift station was out of service, with all power tripped to the control panel. It is our understanding from discussions with field personnel that this is not an unusual occurrence. With no power to the control panel to activate the high water alarm, the station was overflowing directly to the adjacent waterway, resulting in a Sanitary Sewer Overflow event (SSO). We informed your personnel that this event must be reported to the FDEP and appropriate remediation actions be taken in accordance with FDEP regulations. When power was restored and the station pumps exercised, it was found that one pump is out.of service, The second pump needs to be pulled, repaired, and returned to service as soon as possible, FRWA recommends the control panel for the station be repaired at the earliest opportunity, as failure of the station results in direct introductimi of sewage into the environment in violation of State Law. We also recommend stars or a ladder and platform be installed to provide access to the control panel as it is elevated for flood protection and is too high to be accessed from the ground. 2. The Estuary North Lift Station invert does not appear to be properly sealed into the wetwell and shows evidence of groundwater infiltration. The invert should be sealed, and any sand/soils should be cleaned from the bottom of the wetwell. Pump No. 2 was out of service. 3. The Partners Cove Lift Station pump discharge is leaking between the wetwelI and the valve pit. The surrounding ground is saturated with raw sewage and the ground is beginning to subside, This potential SSO situation should be addressed immediately. Additionally, there is no Pump No. 2 installed in the station. All lift station and manhole evaluation forms prepared from our onsite evaluation are attached to this letter to assist in addressing the issues identified. We recommend your office review these forms and address the deficiencies noted as soon as possible to ensure the safe operation of your wastewater treatment and collection system. Please let us know if any of the documentation we received from the City is original and needs to be returned. We will retain all other information in our files should the situation change regarding potential CWSRF funding, and will look forward to the opportunity to work with you in the future. We appreciate the time you and your staff dedicated to assist us in this process, and as previously mentioned, FRWA is committed to assisting our members wherever possible. Sincerely, W ililiam F, Archebelle FRWA Fiscal Sustainability Analyst w/ attachments c.c. Tim Banks, P.E., CWSRF John Sowersby, CWSRF Gary Williams, FRWA Troy Cassidy, FRWA C-2 L.S. Lift Station Inspection Form System: Everglades City LS No. Installation date 3/2006 LS Address: : Chokoloskee Island Pumps amp 230 volts 7.5 hp 3 Phs Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good / Satisfactory ® Debris / Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ® Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 5 4 3 2 1 0 failing excellen This is a dual wetwell station and only one of four pumps work. Comments: f At the time of inspection the only pump working was tripped out Solids overflowing to river. Alarms not working Panels need stairs to safety work inside panels Date:: 12/17/15 .. Time: 11:07 a.m. ector. T. Cassidv B. Archebelle Brick / Mortar DJC Pre -cast Concrete ❑ Lined Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? Yes ❑ No Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? Yes ® No ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps .......... Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to Yes ® No ❑ locate any trouble. Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? Yes ® ....... No ❑ ............... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? Yes ❑ No ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto - Yes ❑ No dialer work? Did the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? Yes F1 No ❑ Did the generator properly function? NIAI Yes ❑ No F1......._......._ ..... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA Yes ❑ No ❑ Surcharge /flooding indications? .. ®grease/debris on sides ®grease / debris under/ around / on cover Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: 1 Sample Comments: Poor Structural Condition, Serviceable, Broken, Unsafe, Damaged, Corroded, Missing Grout, Needs Raising, Needs Lowering Misaligned, Leaking, III -Fitting, Dirty, Bad Joint, Roots, Grease, Infiltration, Cracks L.S. C-3 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City Date: ! 12/17/15 LS N0. Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Time:12;30 p LS Address: Outdoor Resort ® Inspector: T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle Liberty ._ .... 2093 pumps HP 5.0 Amps 15.0 Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? Pump Volts Phase ........ Check pump on/off floats for proper operation Yes . Did all floats operate properly? No Yes No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? El Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ................. ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Meters do not work Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ❑ ........ Check pump on/off floats for proper operation Yes . Did all floats operate properly? No Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ ........ Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? N/A ........... ❑ El......... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA El 11 ...._........ Surcharge /flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease / debris under / around I on cover ❑ .......... Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C-L.S. 4 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City ............ LS N0. Parkway Village Condo Install Date 5-2007 LS Address: Chokoloskee Dr. Pump HP 2.0 Barnes /Brand Volts Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris/ Solids Buildup in LS ❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ® Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible Infiltration Condition 1 2 Excellent #2 Capacitor blown Amps.. Phase Staion is in good shape only minor repair needed. Pump Hour Meters #1 2188.2 #2 4066.1 Date:: 12/17/15 Time: ' 11:35 a.m. Inspector: T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle uVllllX :'aklt er7:oecc Failin I "•'�' "'"�') vE ❑Lined ® Other ---Fiberglass 14,,11-1161 It Pre -cast Concrete Yes Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? #1 out of service ❑ . _ Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ., ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 --amps ....___. .....o _....... ...i_....- ___._ ..._. .._...... _........ Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ......... ® ......... ......... ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? ............... Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ❑ ❑ .... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did El El alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? n/a ❑ ❑ .... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? nla ❑ El Surcharge /flooding indications? ❑ grease / debris on sides ❑ grease / debris under / around / on cover ❑ ............ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Description: C- LS -5 Appendix, Inspection Form Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ® Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris/ Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: _1 3 5 Pump #2 breaker tripped. Pump may be clogged. Station walls beginning to corrode, may want to consider epoxy coat walls. Pump hr Meter #1 674.0 #2 1632.9 Date:: 12-17-15 Time:: 11:45 a .......... I.... . Inspector: T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps .. . ... .......... Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? r' Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a b uiidup of grease & debris? r neon r, �n Lav¢., MNkVNL Material: LJ Brick / Mortar I)JC Pre -cast ❑Lined ❑ Other -------------------------- Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ❑ Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? POSSIBLY .......... _. ❑ ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps .. . ... .......... Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a b uiidup of grease & debris? ❑ .................................. Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? NIA ❑ ❑ _ . Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ .......................... ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? NIA .........._ __........ Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? NIA ❑ El Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ ❑ Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? N/A ❑ ❑ ......... Surcharge /flooding indications? ❑ grease / debris on sides ❑ grease /debris under /around / on cover ❑ ............ Vermin or insects present? Yes ® No ❑ Description: Roaches C -LS 6 LS No. LS Address: .......................... Pump Barnes /Brand Form Everglades CityDate: 12-17-15 Glades Haven Date Installation 10--2002 Time: 12:05 P Inspector:: T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle HP 5.0 Amps u Volts 230 Phase Single Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ® Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris/ Solids Buildup in LS ❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ® Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 1 3 Missing pump #2 needs replaced. ... n satisfactory condition, some mi corrosion HR. Meter #1 2791.2 #2 3243.2 Material: ❑ Brick / Mortar ❑ Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ®Other --Fiberglass Yes Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ❑ _......... Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ❑ ............ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps __... ......... ............................ Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? ........... Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ❑ ..... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did El El alarm sound? Did the light flash? ......... ..................... Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA El ...................... El....... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ Surcharge / flooding indications? ❑ grease/ debris on sides ® grease / debris under / around I on cover ❑ Vermin or insects present?Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS 8 Al System: LS No. LS Address: M. - Form Everglades City Estuary Installation Date 5-2006 HP 2.01 Amos 11.0 Date:: 12-17-15 Time: ! 12:20 p Inspector: T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? LiILI Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? .......... ........................... ......... ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps ..................... ................... ..; Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. . ..... ® . ........... ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any. operational_ problem? ......... Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ® ❑ ... .... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ........._...... ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto dialer work? Did ❑ El alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? El ❑ ......... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA El ❑ __... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ Surcharge /flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease I debris under I around /on cover ❑ _. Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS 9 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City Date::. 12-17-15 LS No. Estuary North Time 12:25 p ...... _... .......... LS Address: Inspector T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle Pump HP 2.0 Amps 11.0 /Brand Volts 208 :Phase Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) _ ❑ Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris / Solids Buildup in LS / 1f ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) i ® Needs Repair (describe In comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ) [ ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints , ",• �rj' �� �I ❑ Visible infiltration r --.-.--- J 1 3 5 Condition Excellent Failin Pump #2 Out of service. Inspect 8" PVC invert seal, appears to not be properly sealed i _____.. to fiberglass wall. ... Material: ❑Brick /Mortar ❑ Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ® Other -Fiberglass - H 11 our Meters 11 #1 11.1 13 11 17 1 11 .9 #2 1 11 1 11 1.11 6 Yes No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? El........ Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ......... ❑ _...................... Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3— amps 11 ..................... 1. Record run tim11 e for e 11 a 11 ch pum11 p at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® ............... __.... ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a b uildup of grease& debris? ® El....._ ......... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ ............... . Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? NIA ❑ ❑ .._.. ............ Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ El _..... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ _.. ❑ Surcharge /flooding indications? grease I debris on sides ® grease I debris under I around / on cover .............. ❑ .. ... Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS -10 . System: ................. LS No. LS Address: Pump /Brand )pendix, Inspection Form Everglades City Partners Cove Installation Date 5-2007 .......... HP 2.0 Amps 15.0 Volts 230 Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good /Satisfactory ® Debris / Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ® Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: Pump #2 missing Phase Single 4 5 Discharge line leaking underground between valves pit and lift station. Hour Meters #1 1039.2 #2 8.2 Date:: 12-17-15 Time 12:35 p Inspector T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle It I Vei' it t R&IIi�1519T 1i .I..VAAt1 li➢iEli RGI 11,111, EC ah�iv at lil'kl: Material: U Brick / Mortar U Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ® Other -Fiberglass - No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ❑ ............... _............ ....... Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ... ......... .............- ❑ ........... _. Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps Record run time for each pump at th�ei station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ® El the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ® _........ ❑ .................... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ ................. Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ ❑ .... ............ ....... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ .......... _......... .........- Surcharge /Flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease I debris under I around / on cover ❑ .......... ........ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS 11 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City LS N0. Captains Table .............. ........ ............... LS Address: ............. Pump HP 2.0 Amps 25.0 /Brand Volts 230 Phase 3 Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good / Satisfactory ® Debris /Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ® Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 1 3.5 5 Excellent Failing #1 pump not functioning, needs repair. Station needs cleaning. Moderate corrosion 0A1, IM11 Date: 112-17-15 ...._............ Time: .................._..... 12:50 p Inspector T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle !11 Material: U Brick / Mortar U Pre -cast ❑Lined ® Other - Fiberglass - Yes No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? El Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ........ ❑ ......._.. .........._ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3_ amps ___.... ...... ......... _........ _..... ........... __...... ....................... ......... ................. Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. .......... ® ............... El Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? . ................ Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ® ❑ ............. ........ .............. Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ ......... ... . Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did El Elthe alarm sound? Did the light flash? . Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ __....... ..... ............. Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ ❑ ........... ............ Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ ................. Surcharge I flooding indications? grease I debris on sides ® grease / debris under/ around I on cover .. ❑ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS 12 Appendix, Inspection For System: Everglades City Date: 12-17-15 ............... - ... ... .. ......... ...... ......... . LS No. Seaboard Villas Time: 12:55 p .......... LS Address: inspector: T. Cassicly& B. Archebelle ............... ...... .. . .. ........ . ... ..... Pump HP 7.5 Amps /Brand ............ ..................... . .... - ................... .. Barnes Volts Phase Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) F] Good (Satisfactory F] Debris I Solids Buildup in LS Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) _ N W Z Needs Repair (describe in comments) 9, I ❑ Cracked I broken sides I foundation E] Misaligned joints A ❑Roots at joints Condition 1 3 5 Excellent Failing NF I Ni Epoxy coating on walls is starting to peel.. Suggest recoating walls. #2 Pump out of service. Valve pit drain needs unclogged 'I d from pit. 112S prase t and water remove n ............. Pump 1 demonstrating bearing noise and appears to be failing. ....................... Material:E] Brick If Mortar Pre -cast Concrete F-11-ined F] Other-------------------------- Hour ther-------------------------- Hour Meters Punnp #1 2774.6 # 2 4808.9 Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ................... ........... El ❑ ........... Z Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps a6oird, run - time - for I 11 aach - pump - a - t - the - station. -Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble, Record El Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup ofgrease& debris? ......................... El ..... . Z ........... ........... ............. ........................ ............. Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? El ........................ El .................... Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did El El the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves property function? NIA El El ............... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA El El Do you exerciseALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA El El .......... ................... ............. Surcharge /flooding indications? grease debris on sides El grease debris under I around I on cover El Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No z Description: C -LS 13 System: LS No. LS Address: Pump /Brand Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ® Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris / Solids Buildup in LS ❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: _1 1.5 5 Station was in good shape, however, moderate hvdroaen sulfide odor. Hour Meter #1671.2 #2 704.7 Material: ❑Lined Date:: 12/17/15 Time:: 1:00 p Inspector T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle ';MM ,1, Other Fiberglass IYl N tN uiu�timi.a:h Yes No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ® ... ❑ . . Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ...... .._-. .. ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 _ amps Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational, problem? _. Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris?❑ ............. Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ ......... Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ ................. ................. ... _._.. ......... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ...... ....._..... ElEl. ........... ._ ... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ __......... .......... Surcharge I flooding indications? ❑ grease/ debris on sides ❑ grease I debris under / around / on cover .. ❑ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C -LS 14 Appendix, Inspect System: 12/17/15 LS No. 1:15p LS Address ....... .....__ ; T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle Pump .... HP 2.0 /Brand Volts Form Everglades City Everglades Isle Installation Date 12-06 Barron River Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ® Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris / Solids Buildup in LS ❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 1 1.5 Excellent Station was in good shape, In minor hvdroaen sulfide odor. Hour Meter #1 85.77 #2 1004.1 Amps Phase Date:: 12/17/15 Time 1:15p .......... Inspector ....... .....__ ; T. Cassidy & B. Archebelle —isx.uxaq ( MII (i. `nVl � A,I I { I � I I � ryr Nlll � Failing ever, had Material: ❑ Brick / Mortar ❑ Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ® Other Fiberglass Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ® ................ ❑ Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ❑ _........... Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps ... Record run time for each pump at the station Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? ....... Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ❑ ..............._ .... _....... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto dialer work? Did ._.... ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? .._..._... Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ ❑ ....................................... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ ......_ _ _. ............ ❑ __.. .... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NIA ❑ ❑ ......_. Surcharge /flooding indications? ❑ ;grease / debris on sides ❑ grease/ debris under/ around / on cover ❑ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No Description: ® p i � J a y e C-LS15 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City Date:: 12-17-15 LS N0. School Lift Station Time:1:30 p _ LS Address Inspector: T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle Pump HP 2.0 Amps (Brand Volts 230 Phase Single Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good I Satisfactory ❑ Debris/ Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) J ® Needs Repair (describe in comments)�� Kl ❑ Cracked I broken sides /foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ,II ,�s,„� �- r I ❑ Roots at joints i,(r llH $� — ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 3 5>� Excellent Failing Station needs cleaned Repair broken valve box A..._ — ............ .. __.. .................. ___ Material: ❑Brick /Mortar ❑ Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ® Other -Fiberglass Hour Meter #1 3337.4 #2 3469.4 Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ® ❑ ............... Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ❑ ....._- Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps Record run time for each pump at the station Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ElDo the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? ............ ............. Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a b uiidup of grease & debris? ® El .......... Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did El the alarm sound? Did the light flash? _ ........ . Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? N/A ❑ ❑ ........ Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? NIA ❑ ... ............ ❑ Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? NA ❑ ❑ .......... __ Surcharge /flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease / debris under / around I on cover ❑ Vermin or insects present? Yes ® No ❑ Description: Roaches C-LS16 Appendix, Inspection Form Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) ❑ Good / Satisfactory ❑ Debris / Solids Buildup in LS ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked I broken sides / foundation ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ Roots atjoints Condition: 1 -1 3.5 5 Very strong h2s odor. Station has moderal grease buildup and also takes water plant R.O. concentrate. Hour Meter #110713.1 #2 6507.2 Cummings Generator Ikl�':Lvp:H` 1!1-IF�1 Date:: 12-17-15 Time:: 1:45 p Inspector:: T. Cassidy &B. Archebelle Material: H Brick I Mortar U Pre -cast Concrete ❑Lined ® Other Fiberglass - Run each pump for a short time Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ................. ......- Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ❑ .................................................... . Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 Record run time for each pump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning? Is there a buildup of grease & debris? Some grease present ............. Check pump onloff floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ .......................... Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto dialer work? Did El alarm sound? Did the light flash? .............. Exercise all lift station valves Did all valves properly function? ❑ .......... _....... .......... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? ❑ _ ......... ......... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? ❑ ....................................... ...................... Surcharge I flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease / debris under I around I on cover ❑ ............... Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: �°�..� ..g:� «»:��� �:�� : :.z�t�� 3�<� . y, � � ?.© -� � . . <� w.� � � «, \` � mwa�� �� �.� ..::»ww::,r« . � .. � � � . . . . �_� � , � �� . .: � � x � .<. . � � � � � � � «» w� � � .< ± C-LS17 Appendix, Inspection Form System: Everglades City Date:: 12/17/15 LS N0. Lee Cypress Date Installed 5/2003 Time 1:50 p LS Address. Copeland Inspector T. Cassidy& B. Archebelle ..................................... Pump HP 5.0 Amps 21.0 ❑ /Brand Fyghts Volts 230 Phase 3 ❑ W Overall LS Condition: (check all that apply) rnmurau ❑ ............ ❑ Good /Satisfactory ❑ — ❑ Debris / Solids Buildup in LS "" f ® Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ El ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ ❑ ❑ Cracked /broken sides I foundation ❑ I � ❑ Misaligned joints ❑ I (rk ❑ Roots atjoints ❑ Visible Infiltration ` I Condition 1 3 5 Failing�• f =� 1 � Excellent L_ Lift station pump sounds as if bearing is Y beginning to fail. Felt vibration through ground Recommend inspect pumps. "" Station epoxy wall coating beginning to fail. Re epoxy coat. Material: ❑ Brick / Mortar ® Pre -cast Concrete ................ __.._. ❑Lined ❑ Other-------------------------- Hour Meter #134529.0 #2 33619.6 Yes No Run each pump for a short time. Did all pumps operate properly during inspection? ® ❑ Were any pumps clogged or suctions obstructed at the time of inspection? ......._...... ........ ❑ Record current draw of each pump Pump 1 amps Pump 2 amps Pump 3 amps Record11 ru11 n 11 time for each p 11 ump at the station. Analyze the runtime minutes onsite to locate any trouble. ❑ Do the pump runtime indicate any operational problem? Does wet well to need cleaning?Is there a buildup of grease & debris? ❑ .................... _.. Check pump on/off floats for proper operation. Did all floats operate properly? ❑ ❑ ............ Check high water float operation for alarm notification. Did the alarm telemetry /auto -dialer work? Did ❑ ❑ the alarm sound? Did the light flash? _._ Exercise all lift station valves. Did all valves properly function? ❑ El ......... Exercise generator (if applicable) at lift station. Did the generator properly function? in standby status ❑ ❑ ........... Do you exercise ALL standby generators at least monthly for 15 to 30 minutes? ❑ ❑ Surcharge /flooding indications? grease / debris on sides ® grease / debris under / around / on cover ❑ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® Description: C MH #1 Manhole Inspection Form System: Everglades City r_J Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) F;J Needs Repair (describe in comments) Date: 12/17/15 .. ­­­ .............................. ........... ............ . MH No. Outdoor Resorts F-1 Visible infiltration Time: 11:20 a MH Address: I Recommend HDPE Liner. flow direction Inspector: T. Cassidy& B. Archellbelle 1w, Overall Condition: (check all that apply) F] Good / Satisfactory r_J Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) F;J Needs Repair (describe in comments) F-1 Cracked / broken shelf or foundation Cracked / broken sides or walls F-1 Misaligned joints / loose Vicks -1 r❑ Roots at joints _4 F-1 Visible infiltration Condition: 5 4 poor excellent Walls are very corroded and several area Show north arrow, around inverts shows signs of infiltration label inlets & where inverts were not properly sealed. outlets, sizes and Recommend HDPE Liner. flow direction e n c h present in bottom o f manhole. No bench Moderate H2S Odors. .......... ............ ............ Material: Brick / Mortar F] Pre -cast Concrete ............ Concrete BlockF_1 LinedR .......... Summarize all inspections and Action Items into a report and submit with the Bacteria Rule Demonstration Checklist. Cover / Ring Condition:® serviceable 0 loose E] damaged El missing E] raise E] lower Riser Condition: D serviceable El loose E damaged E] missing El raise 0 lower Walls & Bottom: El serviceable El loose El damaged Z cracked El holes 0 roots Yes Z No Overflow or diversion lines present? ❑ .......... .......... .......... ......................... ... Other utility lines present? Including force main outfall? Yes El NoZ ........... .. ......... Drop line present/ visible? Internal External Yes Z No F1 Surcharge flooding indications? E:1 grease debris on sides No E] grease debris on shelf No Yes .. . .... ....... ............... . -__1111 .................. .......... - ............... . ... Clarity of Flow? Clear Z turbid sewage appearance E] clear sewage appearance ................ ........... ..................... Flow Conditions? Z steady El pulsing El turbulent ............ .......... Flow Conditions? El low normal El high ................... .. Vermin or insects present? Yes E] :No Z Description: �'�h C MH #2 Manhole Inspection Form System: Everglades City F-1 Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) Date: 12117/15 ........................ ... MH No. Parkway Villas Condo F-1 Visible infiltration Time: 11:40 a ..................... . . ............... ......... MH Address: .......... Inspector: T. Cassidy& B. Archebelle Overall Condition: (check all that apply) M Good / Satisfactory J F-1 Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) F-1 Cracked broken shelf or foundation ❑ Cracked broken sides or walls F-1 Misaligned joints loose bricks F-1 Roots at joints F-1 Visible infiltration Condition: 5 2 1 Show north arrow, i poor excellent label inlets & .Manhole is in good shape. May want to outlets, sizes and epoxy coat concrete block walls. ................ flow direction 1. ........... Material: Brick/ Mortar L] Pre -cast Concrete E] Other Concrete Block® LinedF1 Summarize all inspections and Action Items into a report and submit with the Bacteria Rule Demonstration Checklist. Cover/ Ring Condition:® serviceable E] loose L] damaged [] missing E] raise E] lower Riser Condition: E serviceable Ll loose E] damaged El missing El raise L] lower Walls & Bottom: serviceable El loose El damaged El cracked El holes 0 roots Overflow or diversion lines present? Yes El No �q .................❑. ... ... .. ....... Other utility lines present? Including force main outfall? .. ............... Yes 0 NoO . ........ ..... ............... Drop line present/ visible? Internal External Yes El NoZ .............. urcharge flooding indications? E] grease debris on sides No . El grease debris on shelf No No ........... ........... Clarity of Flow? Clear El turbid sewage appearance Z clear sewage appearance .............. Flow Conditions? El steady El pulsing El turbulent Flow Conditions? Z low Z normal ❑high ... ....... ................. Vermin or insects present? Yes E] No Z Description: C MH #3 Manhole Inspection Form System: Everglades City Date: 12/17115 ............ ......... . MH No. Partners Cove Time: 12:40 p .............. MH Address: Inspector: T. Cassidy& B. Archelbelle ............... N Overall Condition: (check all that apply) Z Good / Satisfactory -1 F❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) F-1 Needs Repair (describe in comments) F-1 Cracked / broken shelf or foundation ❑ Cracked / broken sides or walls F-1 Misaligned joints loose bricks E] Roots at joints ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: 5 2 1 i poor excellent Manhole is surcharging due to lift station Show north arrow, float level and station has a thick sludge label inlets & mat that is causing floats not to properly outlets, sizes and raise. flow direction 71: .............. - .......... Material: Brick /Mortar E] Pre -cast Concrete Z ........... ... Summarize all inspections and Action Items into a report and submit with the Bacteria Rule Demonstration Checklist. Cover / Ring Condition:® serviceable El loose El damaged E] missing El raise El lower Riser Condition: Z serviceable [] loose El damaged El missing F1 raise El lower Walls & Bottom: serviceable El loose E] damaged E] cracked El holes El roots Overflow or diversion lines present? Yes E] No Z ......... .... ................. Other utility lines present? Including force main outfall? Yes El No ................ - ............ .......... ............. Drop line present/ visible? Internal External Yes ❑ NoZ ................. Surcharge indications? Yes F] grease debris on sides No E] grease debris on shelf No ........❑. .... - Clarity of Flow? E:1 turbid sewage appearance Z clear sewage appearance Flow Conditions? ❑ steady E] pulsing El turbulent .............. Flow Conditions? Z low El normal El high No Vermin or insects present? Yes E]® Description: C MH #4 Manhole Inspection Form System: Everglades MH No. Copeland MH Address: Overall Condition: (check all that aoolvl Date:: 12/17/15 ................... :..____-.___.............. Time:: 1:50 P Inspector: T. Cassidy& B. Archebelle ® Good / Satisfactory ❑ Needs Maintenance (describe in comments) ❑ Needs Repair (describe in comments) ❑ Cracked / broken shelf or foundation \1 ❑ Cracked / broken sides or walls ❑Misaligned joints /loose bricks 1 r F-1 Roots at joints., ❑ Visible infiltration Condition: oor excellent Show north arrow, label inlets & .Manhole is in good shape. May want to outlets, sizes and (owe r drop Invert. p �........... flow direction 51t I t i^ . Material: Brick / Mortar ❑ Pre -ca Lined ❑ Summarize all inspections and Action Items into a report and submit with the Bacteria Rule Demonstration Checklist. Cover/ Ring Condition:® serviceable ❑ loose ❑ damaged ❑ missing ❑ raise ❑ lower Riser Condition: ® serviceable ❑ loose ❑ damaged ❑ missing ❑ raise ❑ lower Walls & Bottom: ® serviceable ❑ loose ❑ damaged ❑ cracked ❑ holes ❑ roots Overflow or diversion lines present? Yes E] No ........... Other utility lines present? Including force main outfall? Yes ❑ No _ .... Drop line present/ visible? Internal / External Yes ❑ No ......_ ............._ Surcharge /flooding indications? ❑ grease / debris on sides No ❑ grease / debris on shelf No No Clarity of Flow? Clear ❑ turbid sewage appearance ® clear sewage appearance Flow Conditions? ®steady ❑pulsing ❑ turbulent ............ Flow Conditions? ❑low® normal Elhigh ............. _ Vermin or insects present? Yes ❑ No ® I Description: 1 EVERGLADES CITY UTILITY SYSTEMIINFRASTRUCTURE CONCEPTUAL ASSESSMENT 12-5-2015 WP Infrastructure Overview Plant (.160MGD) and associated collections system is in disrepair and failing. Deficiencies identified in consent order are 2-3 years old. Assumptions are that the system has not been consistently rehabilitated or maintained since the order and the system infrastructure has further substantially degraded. Initial conceptual costs to bring the WW infrastructure system into FDEP compliance (plants, pump stations, forcemains, ares, manholes, integrated water/wastewater/IQ meters, telemetry, reclaimed I/Q system that needs to be built throughout the service area) are approximately 32 million dollars, An additional 23 million dollars would be necessary to bring to the City's Utility infrastructure to CCWSD utility standards for conveyance as a prerequisite for Water, Wastewater, IQ Water infrastructure as a whole (please note the FDEP and EPA Rules require cross -connection control for both W/WW field operations). Conveyance of the utility system would require that the system meet current Collier County Water -Sewer District Utility Standards and follow the established conveyance process. Commitment to environmental stewardship, as well as human health, safety and welfare, suggests that the•system be rebuilt with reliability and sustainable practices at the forefront. Rate Structure and Analysis The Everglades City utility is comingled in the general fund, therefore not an enterprise fund and appears to receive support from (and competes with) the general fund to meet operational and CIP requirements. Utility bills for water and sewer service, including base and volume charges (3 TGAL) in 2010 equal $48.75 per month, representing 1.61 % of median household income (meets Fitch standards of 2.5% or below). To meet operating expense and debt service requirements (no CIP), proposed rate increases included a 40% increase FY12 over FYI 1, 25% FYI over FYI and another 38% FY14 over FYI 3. These "rate adjustments" would have brought the monthly utility bill for 3 TGAL to $117.74, or 3.9% of median household income (Board approved IPage CCWSD rates in effect 10/1/15 = $72.34 including base charges and 3 TGAL volume charges) Because these adjustments were not economically feasible, the recommendation from TetraTech was to engage a rate consultant to perform an in-depth rate study, and float 2 new 30 -year municipal bonds to fund the CIP program (never done) and pursue grant funding (the water grant was begun by TetraTech), however, no wastewater grant funding is evident in any documents reviewed. 21 Page Backup Working Details Exhibit I - Summary of FDEP CO Current Plant Permit: A 60 MGD, average annual flow, with disposal to a rapid infiltration basin, slow rate public access reuse system, surface water discharge to the Lake Placid Canal Ordered Repairs to Existing Plant • Improve protocol and enforcement for pretreatment (grease removal) • Replace calibration standards and buffers • Repair broken surge tank pump • Repair air diffusers • Repair clarifier skimmers • Repair malfunctioning flow meters • Repair rails, catwalks, ladders for safe access • Repair secondary blower • Repair digester blower • Repair clarifier (_ • Replace VFD on the EQ pump.and 3 RAS pumps • Repair auto samplers • Replace air compressor and hydropneumatic tank on the irrigation (reuse?) system • Repair the reuse automatic diversion system Ordered Corrective Reporting Submit application package for plant operating permit renewal Submit corrective action reports to the FDEP every 6 months detailing status of projects being completed under order Submit Operation and Maintenance Performance Report and Capacity Analysis Report Ordered Remedial Action • Eliminate and dismantle current surface water discharge associated with existing plant • Design a complete replacement WW treatment plant without surface water discharge • Complete an application for construction of a new plant without surface water discharge . 31 Page oversee construction of new plant and modifications Evaluate/Design /Repair the noncompliant effluent disposal and collections system 41 Page Exhibit II -Summary of Initial Remedial CIP Financials Financials (from Tetra Tech Master Plan Document) • CIP for wastewater 2014 through 2017 estimated at $6,450,000 Financial Projections identify Net Revenue deficiencies (after debt service) through FY16 with projected wastewater rates increases of 22% in FY16 and 27% in FYI (unknown as to any rates increases in place). Conclusion states "We now NEED FINANCIAL Support" from BCB and SFWMD • A Utility Revenue Sufficiency Review was performed by TetraTech (not a rate consultant) on behalf of SFWMD and BCB to evaluate the City's utility revenues ability to meet projected expenses and proposed CIP • Study is referred to as a: a.. Utility Revenue Review b. Revenue Sufficiency Study c. Rate Study • The City of everglades City utility is comingled in the general fund, therefore not an enterprise fund and appears to receive support from the general fund to meet funding requirements • Utility bills for water and sewer service, including base and volume charges (3 TGAL) in 2010 equal $48,75 per month, representing 1,61% of median household income (meets Fitch standards of 2.5% or below). • Just to meet operating expense and debt service requirements (no CIP), proposed rate increases included a 40% Increase FYI over FYI 1, 25% FYI over FY12 and another 38% FY14 over FYI • These "rate adjustments" would bring the monthly utility bill for 3 TGAL to $117.74, or 3.9% of median household income (Board approved CCWSD rates in effect 10/1/15 = $72.34 including base charges and 3 TGAL volume charges) • Because these adjustments were not economically feasible, the recommendation from TetraTech was to engage a rate consultant to perform an in-depth rate study, and float 2 new 30 -year municipal bonds to fund the CIP program (never done) and pursue grant funding (the water grant was begun by TetraTech), however, no wastewater grant funding is evident in any documents reviewed thus far 51 Page Everglades City Reclaim Water Production System Upgrade Collection System INTRODUCTION In 2010, South Florida Management District (SFWMD) undertook a Water and Wastewater Master Plan study on behalf of the City and determined that a major upgrade/replacement of the wastewater collection and treatment system is required. The Everglades City Reuse WaterProdtustion Facility (RWPF) provides services to the incorporated areas of the City and portions of unincorporated Collier County communities of Copeland, Carnestown, and Chokoloskee. This -Reclaim Water Production -System Upgrade program incorporates improvements at the plant as well as . collection .system. The existing RWPF-has a DEP permit (FL0027618-005 (minor)) which has an annual average daily flow allotment of 160,000 gallons per day (gpd). Everglades City has the capability to distribute 100% of the reuse water produced to the residential community. The RWPF is over 40 years old and has exceeded its planned useful life. The plant and collection system is located adjacent to sensitive mangrove areas that are part of the Everglades National Park. The plant must be upgraded to meet regulatory requirements. The wastewater collection system was constructed in 1991 incorporating low pressure residential and community grinder pump stations, and three master pump station (Copeland, Carnestown and Chokoloskee) serving approximately 750 accounts. The issues of concern are the Inflow that enters the collection system and out flow when power is lost. This inflow is salt water. During daily tidal flow and frequent storm events, an additional 30,000 — 50,000 gallons per day of flow enters the system. This has a negative impact on the RWPF biological treatment and steel tanks as well as producing high salt reuse water that has a negative impact when used for irrigation. When power is lost, the lift stations can overflow and discharge into sensitive waters. Because the low elevation of the community in relation to sea level, an evaluation needs to be undertaken to determine what is the cause of the infiltration and inflow. The low pressure collection system (Environmental One Corporation (e -one)) is comprised of approximately 250_C tinder pump stations, 13 lift stations, and one -master lift stations. The components that require upgrade are located in Everglades City and Chokoloskee. The community of Copeland is served by a master lift station that pumps the flow to the Carnestown lift station where it combines with the Carnestown community flow and is pumped approximately 5 miles to the plant. The Copeland and /Carnestown lift stations are being upgraded in 2014 as a component of the water system upgrade program. Each station will have standby power. INVESTIGATION A field inspection survey was conducted over a two week period to evaluate the collection system. The majority of the grinder pump stations were inspected as well as the following lift stations: Station Name Existing Size (Hp) Chokoloskee Master 7.5 Outdoor Resort 2 Sunset Lodge 1 Parkway 2 Glades Haven 5 Everglades School 2 Fishermans Cove 5 Partners Cove 2 Estuary W(1) 2 Estuary W(2) 2 Seafood Depot 5 Seaboard Villas 7.5 Everglades Isle (1) 2 Everglades Isle (2) 2 OBSERVATION A. Grinder Pumps Stations Grinder pump stations fall into two categories, simplex — one pump in basin and duplex — two pumps in basin. Approximately 100 of the stations top are at or below adjacent grade. This allows for surface water as well as tidal water to enter the collection system. See photos - attachment 1. Approximately 50 covers have been damaged. Many of the pumps are at or near the end of their useful life. See photos - attachment 2. The system was installed 23 years ago and the average pump life is 15 years. Many should be replaced. The a -one system is a proprietary system and replacing existing pumps with another vendor will require a major overhaul of the control and operation of the entire collection system. The least cost alternative is to continue to work with a -one to upgrade the required system components. B. Lift Stations All 14 lift stations were inspected. Each one needs to be upgraded. Many do not meet standards. Most electrical controls are below FEMA level. All were constructed as duplex stations, yet most have only one pump in operation due to issues with outdated controls and age of units. See photos- attachment 3. Four stations need to be fully replaced as the stations are fiberglass and have crac s inhem that allow salty groundwater o en erthe station. ome minor modifications are required in a number of stations to eliminate the entrance of tidal water. Infiltration in the Outdoor Resort community gravity pipe system that feeds the City lift station has been observed. They have been advised that they need to make appropriate changes. RECOMMENDATION A. Grinder Pumps Stations Work with a -one to upgrade and replace system components. This will include: 1. Replace 100 six inch risers and covers 2. Replace 50 station covers 3. Replace 20 simplex control panels 4. Replace 5 duplex panels 5. Replace 50 power supply cables 6. Repair 25 existing grinder pumps 7. Purchase 15 spare grinder pumps B. Lift Stations Each of the 14 lift stations need to be upgraded. They include: Station Name Chokoloskee Master Outdoor Resort Sunset Lodge Parkway -,Glades Haven Everglades School —Fishermans Cove Partners Cove Estuary W(1) Estuary W(2) —Seafood Depot Seaboard Villas Everglades Isle (1) Everglades Isle (2) Recomendation Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Replace with new station Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Replace with new station Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Replace with new station Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Replace with new station Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Use existing with new pumps, valves, controls Certain station capacity will be increased to better meet demand. They include: Station Name Chokoloskee Master Outdoor Resort Proposed Size (Hp) 11 Hp/230v/3ph 4 Hp/230v/3ph Sunset Lodge 4 Hp/230v/3ph Parkway 4 Hp/230v/3ph Glades Haven 6 Hp/230v/3ph Everglades School 4 Hp/230v/3ph —=Fishermans Cove 6 Hp/230v/3ph Partners Cove 4 Hp/230v/3ph Estuary W(1) 4 Hp/230v/3ph Estuary W(2) 4 Hp/230v/3ph --Seafood Depot 6 Hp/230v/3ph Seaboard Villas 11 Hp/230v/3ph Everglades Isle (1) 4 Hp/230v/3ph Everglades Isle (2) 4 Hp/230v/3ph Certain stations currently do not have 3 phase power and will require equipment to convert to 3 phase. They include: Outdoor resorts; Sunset Lodge; Parkway; Everglades School; Partner's Cove; Everglades Isles (2). A digital flow meter will be Installed on the discharge of each station to allow the meter reader the opportunity to record monthly flow. The Impact of loss of power can be environmentally significant. Each lift station should be provided with the ability to operate with standby generator power. The cost of Installing a generator at each lift station Is in excess of $300,000. As an alternative, one mobile generator can support all lift station. The cost of one mobile generator is approximately $50,000. The City has the vehicle that can transport the mobile generator. The existing lift stations have a variety of pump vendors. The Copeland and Carnestown lift stations are currently being upgraded with Xylem (Flygt) equipment. The City's desire is to standardize on one vendor to minimize variability of equipment and maximize flexibility. It is recommended that the bid documents use Xylem as the base bid with other vendors as alternate. Final decision on vendor would be based on best value and flexibility. BUDGET Planning level budget for the identified items is: A. Grinder Pumps Stations $100,000 B. Lift stations $700,000 C. Miscellaneous $100,000 D. Contingency $100,000 E. Total $1,000,000 Attachment 1 Grinder pump station tops � Y 1 �l 1� 3`r � Y 1 3`r R i I 1 L 1 i c/Ak MINION f C , 1 1 4s -N? I , f C , 1 1 I , I i 1 «yi�; `f . r:r i7w. D a ` a ig— a, ,Il 1 Tj yyl Y S` -Aim $jppqq � (/ J %q kF` j t la j{ 4r i 1 C r r' Xv i - d 7� ZIA - �•,' 'fie '�`{ , 1 � i\ r IJ• R s l t � i,� p 1 ,'� , R� 4 f � •.t is � t �_ � -d�.• - �,�� t � � fir;. � J 5 � , � ry(x. � P41 I�v �` ` 1 � � ��. � _ t � � �+,+ ' � .b ` ,i;� `' ` ���.,. /5 � )1a 4 �l. 1 � � �; � � 5 9„ 5; a,f �� a 5 G! a.!;r �.. 1 �3 p 1 r.}_':� 4 \�. �-j.- , ''�.,.5�. ;k �d ' � .b : � "r ,i;� ,;w + 4 ,�I 1 � � � � Ii 9„ 5; a,f �� i, �� ;sC ,� �.:, -;� _ t r . ,. _ . _ � � ,� � � !' �' - r: e;s. „_ <_ ',. , ,. ' \ 1 1 �3 p r.}_':� 4 \�. �-j.- , ''�.,.5�. ;k ' � .b : � "r ,i;� ,;w + 4 ,�I 1 � � � � Ii 9„ 5; a,f �� i, �� ;sC ,� �.:, -;� _ t r . ,. _ . _ ,yy. 0 I. MVI CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. Description No. Table of Contents -i- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Project Goal 1-4 1.3 Project Priorities 1-4 2.0 DEMAND PROJECTIONS 2.1 Service Area Description 2-1 2.2 Population Projections 2-1 2.3 Water and Wastewater Demands 2-5 3.0 WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 3.1 General 3-1 3.2 Water Supply Wells 3-1 3.3 Water Treatment Plant 3-6 3.4 Water Booster Station 3-7 4.0 WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 4.1 General 4-1 4.2 Collection System 4-1 4.3 Wastewater Treatment Plant 4-1 4.4 Surface Water Discharge 4-5 4.5 Reclaimed Water System 4-5 5.0 STORMWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 5.1 General 5-1 5.2 Existing Flooding Issues 5-1 5.3 Flood Plain Map 5-1 5.4 Available Water Quality Information 5-6 5.5 Recommendations for Future Analysis 5-6 6.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 Drinking Water Quality Requirements 6-1 6.2.1 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1986 6-1 6.2.2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 6-4 6.2.3 Disinfection/Disinfection By -Product Rule 6-5 Existing and Future 6.2.4 Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Existing and Future 6-8 6.2.5 Groundwater Rule 6-9 reraH Tr:cri LTJ JLW/sma/masterplan/TOC Tt#P200-04546-10003 i- 093010 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Page No. 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 8.1 6.2.6 Sulfate Rule 6-10 8.2 6.2.7 Radon and Radionuclides 6-10 6.2.8 Arsenic 6-11 6.2.9 Emergent Pollutants of Concern 6-11 6.3 Surface Water Quality 6-12 7.0 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 7.1 General 7-1 7.2 Drinking Water Treatment Alternatives 7-1 7.2.1 Alternative 1: New Fresh Water Supply Wells with 7-1 Existing Treatment 9-3 9.4 7.2.2 Alternative 2: Existing Water Supply with 7-2 Additional Treatment 9-3 7.2.3 Alternative 3: New ,Brackish Water Supply Wells with 7-3 Membrane Treatment 9-5 7.3 Drinking Water Treatment Operation and Maintenance Costs 7-4 7.4 Drinking Water Treatment Recommendations 7-4 7.5 Wastewater Treatment Alternatives 7-5 7.5.1 Alternative 1: Conventional BNR Package Plant 7-6 7.5.2 Alternative 2: Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) 7-8 -ii- 7.5.3 Alternativ3 3: Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) 7-9 7.6 Wastewater Treatment Operation and Maintenance Costs 7-10 7.7 Wastewater Treatment Recommendations 7-10 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 8.1 General 8-1 8.2 Recommended Capital Improvements Program 8-1 8.2.1 Drinking Water System 8-1 8.2.2 Wastewater System 8-5 9.0 FUNDING SOURCES 9.1 Existing Rates and Charges 9-1 9-2 Funding Sources 9-2 9-3 South Florida Water Management District 9-3 9.3.1 Alternative Water Supply Funding 9-3 9.3.2 Other SFWMD Funding 9-3 9.4 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 9-3 9.4.1 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program 9-3 9.4.2 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program 9-5 9.4.3 Small Community Wastewater Facilities Grants Program 9-5 9.4.4 State Bond Loan Program 9-5 9.5 Community Development Block Grants 9-5 Ell NNT; CH JL W/sma/masterplau/TOC Tt #P200-04546-10003 -ii- 093010 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Description 9.6 US Department of Agriculture Office of Rural Development 9.6.1 Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants 9.6.2 Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants 9.7 Florida Rural Water Association 9.8 Bond Pools APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D`. Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Page No. 9-6 9-6 9-6 9-7 9-7 Everglades City Water System Master Plan and Preliminary Data and Information Summary Existing Water Quality Rates Consumptive Use Permit RAI and Application Existing Drinking Water Quality Standards Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations Permit Everglades City Water Conservation Ordinance and Ordinance Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Hydrogeology of the Gray Limestone Aquifer Rule and Charge (.3� .z. r,1.ekF, T E CFI JLW/sma/masterplan/TOC Tt 4P200-04546-10003 iii- 093010 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL Everglades City is a small municipality in the southernmost portion of Collier Comity as illustrated in Figure 1-1. The City is the interface to Big Cypress Swamp with the coastal wetlands lining the north coast of Chokoloskee Bay. This highly sensitive estuarine shallow water region is part of the "Ten Thousand Islands" area that is known to be a vital part of the ecology of Southern Everglades National Park as it is home to many species of birds, fish and other wildlife. The outer portions of the City are characterized by mangrove wetlands. The center of the City was artificially elevated in the 1920s through dredge and fill operations of the Collier County Company. The scope of work for this project is to prepare a water management system master plan for a 20 - year planning period for the water, wastewater and storm water systems for the City of Everglades City. Everglades City provides water and / or wastewater service to portions of the surrounding areas of Copeland, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee. An aerial of the region including these surrounding areas is shown in Figure 1-2. The City's storm water infrastructure is limited to the City limits. Existing water supply needs within the City's water service area are met with the surficial aquifer, and the water system is not able to meet current drinking water regulations for disinfection and disinfection by products. Alternative water supply use is limited to reclaimed water, which is utilized throughout the City for irrigation of medians and residential lawns. The City's low pressure wastewater collection system is in good condition and has reduced or eliminated infiltration into the collection system, but the existing wastewater treatment facility is in need of extensive repairs. Necessary capital improvements to repair or replace existing water and wastewater facilities will be identified in this master plan. Drainage within the developed areas of the City is inhibited by limited natural relief to convey storm water, extremely high ground water and significant tailwater from both tidal events and periodic storm surge. Specific improvements to repair or replace existing storm water infrastructure should be identified through a separate storm water master plan. The scope of work relative to storm water for this master plan is to generally characterize the drainage issues and outline recommendations for a storm water master planning effort. � IFET RAT.CH JLW/slm/maste plan/Section 1 Tt#P200-04546-10003 1-1 093010 A e d x, s r<� �, b'at✓ty4}3r�N �'(y .y� i��IKR ul�.`�+�'.:-�i� � F�' �Y � '� 4�. i � � { t � a`y 1 t ✓' "'r� £zr ti.- � 2. '� �' � •r e i ytTe h q a3y�A Y n" A 4 p V 'ilG R i Y.J.��'.41>� PROTECT GOAL The main goal of this master plan is to identify capital improvements necessary for the water and wastewater systems through 2030, and to identify a scope of work and costs associated with a separate storm water master planning effort. 1.2 PROJECT PRIORITIES Priorities for this project include: 1. Public Health and Safety. The highest priority for any master plan is to ensure that public health and safety is maintained. This includes compliance with current and future drinking water regulations, compliance with reclaimed water regulations and maintaining a reasonable level of service for flood abatement. 2. Customer Expectations. The existing drinking water supply does not meet customer expectations for color. The proposed drinking water improvement options identified in this master plan will include options that address regulatory compliance as well as customer expectations in terms of color. 3. Compliance with Regulatory Agency Goals. Compatibility with regulatory agency goals is essential to a successful master plan. This master plan will focus on improvements necessary to bring the City's facilities into and maintain compliance with regulatory guidelines 4. Enhancement of Chokoloskee Bay and Barron River. Recommendations for a future storm water master plan that addresses best management practices to protect water quality are included in this master plan. 5. Protection of Other Natural Resources. The natural areas adjacent to or in the vicinity of the City include Everglades National Park, Big Cypress National Park and Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park. Protection of wetlands, groundwater and other natural resources within these areas is a priority. This master plan will focus on sustainable water supply projects and water quality management practices that protect natural resources to the maximum extent possible. ,e fdTRA I M I JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 1 Tt#P200-04546-10003 1-4 093010 SECTION 2 DEMAND PROJECTIONS 2.1 SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION Tetra Tech used both land use and parcel count to determine and confirm the previously established population and flow projections for the Everglades City service area. Although the City does not currently serve all areas of Plantation Island, Copeland and Chol oloskee Island, all of these areas were included in the demand projections for planning purposes. The USGS map illustrating these areas can be found in Figure 2-1. 2.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS Population estimates for the service area as established by Collier County, the City's Planning and Zoning reports as well as the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan are provided in Table 2-1 below. Table 2-1 Available Population Data Year Collier County Population Estimate City Planning and Zoning . Report Population Data Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan 2005 1,436 1,367 1,367 2010 1,523 1,561 1,561 2015 1,616 1,767 1,767 2020 1,715 1,987 1 1,987 2025 1,819 2,219 2,219 771 2030 1,929 A detailed land use and parcel analysis was completed to verify the existing and build out populations of the Everglades City service area. Figure 2-2 illustrates the land use and parcel data utilized for this analysis. The total number of existing single family homes, undeveloped lots and mobile homes were estimated via visual observation using aerial maps. The estimated counts for developed, undeveloped and trailers, for each section in the service area are illustrated in Table 2-2. jj TrlRiTECH iJ JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-1 051910 } �v r 2 5 , li• .yA.. L7- � i 4 "r�.0 5F k � � ! x J*�¢ { 4 -0 Jl i '. 4� I - ,(' `fSFP�I�S+A!^i k-�.x � �(_M iY .�6 +lSx"t�y�.a'Y.�>si �:l � N �tl �. ``� 5 4{�• a" 2 �$ %'f �y % S' !i +M Y t 3� WS ......._....... F F wb `b b6 �� "' : sn+mn a• �� E.� � i AAy � Ew / u o All Y 0-1 L ��lCF hx Table 2-2 Land Use Data Area Existing Single Family Homes Existing Mobile Homes Undeveloped (Empty Lots) Est. Lots for Undeveloped (yacantLand Build Out Housing Units Chokoloskee 170 300 70 2030 540 Everglades Ci 250 130 130 352 862 Copeland 1 85 1 50 632 767 Plantation 140 1 156 296 TOTAL 645 1 430 406 984 2,465 Based on the total existing housing units from the table above, the current population for the service area is estimated at 2,236 people (1,075 housing units X 2.08 persons/housing units), assuming 100% occupancy of housing units. In the 2000 Census the unoccupied housing units accounted for 33% of the total homes. Applying the same percent of unoccupied homes to the total population, the existing population is reduced to 1,475 persons. To determine the ultimate population or build out condition for the Everglades City Service area, all the undeveloped lots are assumed to have a single family residence demand with an overall occupancy of 100%. Incorporating these assumption yields an estimated build out of 2,465 housing units with an ultimate population of 5,127 persons. There are large areas surrounding the City which are classified as mangrove swamp in the SFWMD land use map, and these areas were not included in the build -out population estimate Table 2-3 presents the anticipated population growth based on a growth rate of 2.5%. Table 2-3 Estimated Service Area Permanent Population by Year Year Anticipated Service Area Permanent Population 2010 1,475 2015 1,669 2020 1,888 2025 2,136 2030 2,417 JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-4 051910 A seasonal population of 20% of the total estimated 2030 population was added for a total population estimate of 2,900. The seasonal population estimate was selected to be consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. Table 2-4 Estimated Service Area Permanent Population Plus Seasonal Population by Year Year Anticipated Service Area Permanent Population Anticipated Service Area Permanent Plus Seasonal Population 2010 1,475 1,770 2015 1,669 2,003 2020 1,888 2,266 2025 2,136 2,563 2030 2,417 2,900 2.3 WATER AND WASTEWATER DEMAND To determine existing and ultimate treatment demands for the service area, typical single family residence demands of 350 and 300 gallons per day (gpd) per residential lot were assumed for water and wastewater treatment demands. Table 2-5 summarizes the water and wastewater treatment demand for service area for the 20 year planning period. Table 2-5 Projected Water and Wastewater Demand Area Projected Water Demand d Projected Wastewater Flow d Everglades City Service Area 487,980 418,269 For planning purposes, a capacity of 0.5 MGD was utilized for both the water and wastewater facilities. „c,rrt,,,aer� t JLW/shn/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-5 051910 SECTION 3 WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 3.1 GENERAL The Everglades City water system currently provides service to Everglades City, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island and parts of Copeland. The existing system consists of a water treatment plant located in Copeland that includes three water supply wells, a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, aeration, and chloramination. The existing water treatment facility is rated for a maximum daily demand of 0.504 MGD. An aerial of the existing treatment plant site is illustrated in Figure 3-1. The system is not in compliance with existing disinfection and disinfection by product regulations. From the main water treatment plant, water is pumped approximately 7 -miles through an existing 8 -inch PVC water main to Everglades City. The City has a water booster station located in Everglades City that includes a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, chloramination and high service pumps. Tetra Tech inspected the above ground water facilities on April 6, 2010. During the site inspection, City staff provided information on existing and past problems with the water facilities. The information obtained during the site inspection and from the regulatory files is summarized below. Photographs from the site visit can be found in Figures 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4. A general discussion of system deficiencies is found at the end of this section, and specific capital improvement options can be found in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. 3.2 WATER SUPPLY WELLS The City has three water supply wells, each cased to a depth of 15 feet. Each well has a supply capacity of 220 gallons per minute (gpm). Table 3-1 includes a description of each of the existing water supply wells. Table 3-1 Existing Water Supply Wells Well Name EDEP ID Total Depth Casing Depth + Pump Capacity Aquifer West Well AAA9923 25 15 220 gpm Surficial Center Well AAA9922 25 15 220 gpm Surficial East well AAA9921 25 15 220 gpm Surficial The reliable wellfield capacity with one well out of service is 0.633 million gallons per day (MGD). However, at the time of the site inspection, only one well was in operation due to -rrr a"A Y ecr+ 7LW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-1 093010 -- Everglades City kWater Management System Master Plan E 3 2'e Existing Wells Everglades City VU oFigure A Water Management System Master Plan. A .3-3 Existing Treatment Site T' T R A uiEC-H Everglades City Water Management System Master Plan Existing Booster Station Figure 3-4 microbial contamination issues with the other two wells. In discussions with City staff, microbial contamination is a frequent occurrence especially at the start of the rainy season. A review of the FDEP file indicates that the City has been notified that the Center well is microbially contaminated by the presence of Total Coliform and E. Coli Bacteria. Based on this contamination, the City must either: 1. Prove that the well is not microbially contaminated by the submission of 20 new well samples, 2. Provide treatment to achieve 4 log virus removal / inactivation, or 3. Replace the contaminated well. Based on areview of the file and discussions at the site, microbial contamination of the wells is a persistent problem. In addition to the microbial contamination issues, it was also noted during the site inspection that there is a persistent problem with iron bacteria in the existing wells. It is recommended that the City install additional treatment facilities to achieve 4 -log virus removal inactivation without exceeding disinfection by product regulations and replace the existing wells. 3.3 WATER TREATMENT PLANT The existing water treatment plant is located in Copeland and the general components are summarized in Table 3-2 below. Table 3-2 Existing Water Treatment Plant Equipment No. Component Capacity/ Volume I Pre -Cast Ground Storage Tank 500,000 gallons 2 Sodium Hypochlorite System Storage 800 gallons 3 Sodium Hypochlorite Feed Pumps 3 at 76 gpd each 4 Ammonia Storage 150 gallons 5 Ammonia Feed Pumps 3 pumps 6 Corrosion Inhibitor Storage 100 gallons 7 Corrosion Inhibitor Feed Pump 1 pump 8 Hydropneumatic Tank 3,170 gallons 9 Generator 90 KW 10 Fuel Storage 576 Gallons 11 Cartridge Filters 4-300 g m cartridge filters 12 High Service Pumps each with Variable Frequency Drive 2-400 gpm A 140' pumps - 20 hp J JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-6 .093010 The treatment facilities were in good condition at the time of inspection. Specific items noted for repair or replacement are summarized below: 1. The float system in the ground storage tank needs to be replaced. 2. A cover is needed over the chemical storage tanks located outside. 3. Air conditioning for the controls located inside the building is recommended. 4. The windows in the building are in need of replacement. 5. An interior storage space is recommended. 6. The generator is undersized and has reached its useful life and should be replaced. The improvements identified above are generally maintenance related, and are identified as such in the recommended capital improvements program discussed in Section 8 of this report. In addition to the improvements identified above, it is recommended that additional treatment facilities be installed to provide 4 -log virus removal or inactivation without exceeding the disinfection by product regulations. Recommendations for water treatment improvements are further discussed in Section 7 of this report. 3.4 WATER BOOSTER STATION The City owns a water booster station located in Everglades City. Water leaving the treatment facility is pumped to the water booster station and disinfected prior to being distributed to customers in Everglades City, Chokoloskee and Plantation. Customers in Copeland receive water directly from the treatment facility in Copeland. The water booster station components are summarized in Table 3-3 below. Table 3-3 Water Booster Station No. Component Capacity / Volume 1 Precast Ground Storage Tank 500,000 gallons 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Storage 75 gallons 3 Sodium Hypochlorite feed pumps 2 at 60 gpd 4 Ammonia Storage (not in o eration) 100 gallons 5 Ammonia Feed Pumps 2 at 6 g d 6 Generator 350 KW 7 High Service Pumps 2-300 g m 8 Jockey Pumps 2-60 gpm 9 Fire Pump (out of service) 1-300 gpm gas powered pump JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-7 093010 The water booster station was generally in good condition at the time of the site inspection. Recommended maintenance improvements that have been included in the capital program are identified below: 1. Fire pump was not operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. 2. Outdoor chemical storage needs a roof. 3. A control room with air conditioning is recommended. 4. The existing control system may require replacement. JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt 0200-04546-10003 3-8 093010 SECTION 4 WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 4.1 GENERAL The Everglades City wastewater treatment system provides service to the incorporated areas of the City and to portions of Copeland and Chokoloskee. Plantation Island is not served by the Everglades City wastewater system; however, because the residents of Plantation Island utilize septic tanks, extending wastewater service to this area would be a benefit to the region. The existing wastewater treatment plant has a capacity of 0.16 MGD on an annual average daily flow basis. The existing treatment process generally consists of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, filtration and disinfection. An aerial of the site is illustrated in Figure 4-1. The existing wastewater collection system is a low pressure system utilizing individual grinder pump stations. Tetra Tech conducted a site inspection of the wastewater facilities on April 6, 2010. A summary of our observations is included within this section along with insights gathered from City staff and the regulatory files. Photographs of the existing facilities can be found in Figure 4-2. Recommended capital improvements can be found in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. 4.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM The wastewater collection system includes approximately 245 grinder pump stations in tine City of Everglades City, approximately 5 grinder pump stations in Chokoloskee, and two master pump stations (one in Chokoloskee and one in Copeland). All existing grinder pumps were manufactured by E/One, and all have a similar configuration with a check valve in the wetwell. Approximately fourteen (14) of the existing grinder pump stations are duplex and all other are shnplex design. The collection system is fairly new and is generally in good condition. Recommended improvements include: 1. Electrical upgrades are required at the Chokoloskee master pump station. 2. The influent lines to both master pump stations need to be flushed to clear debris. 3. A valve vault is needed at the Copeland master pump station. 4.3 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT The existing wastewater treatment plant is located in the City of Everglades City at Copeland Avenue and Kumquat Street, and the existing treatment components include: JLW/slur/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 4-1 093010 0 N 100 Feet Everglades City Wastewater Treatment Plant EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIGURE 4-1 v. ^ ~�� /��\ Win, EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIGURE 4-1 TECH Everglades City TETRA Water Management System Master Pian Figure Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant • Flow Equalization • Aeration • Secondary Clarifiers • Aerobic Sludge Digestion • Sludge Drying Beds • Filtration • Chlorination • Dechlorination • Reject Storage • Reclaimed Storage • Surface Water Discharge Most of the treatment facilities at the existing plant include either steel or glass lined steel tanks. At the time of inspection, several of the tanks were in poor condition and in need of immediate repair. Specific items noted for repair include: 1. Flow equalization tank needs new mixers and controls, 2. Clarifiers need new internal equipment, 3. Return activated sludge pumps and valves need to be replaced, 4. Filter track, chain and rails need to be replaced, 5. Chlorine contact chamber needs to be replaced, 6. Gas chlorination needs to be replaced, 7. At least one of the five aeration tanks was leaking and needs to be repaired or replaced, 8. Both digesters were leaking and need to be repaired or replaced, 9. Drying beds need new valves, 10. Flow charts need to be replaced, 11. Reuse meter needs to be replaced, X12. Blowers need to be replaced, 13. An influent bar screen and grit removal system is recommended. In addition to the items noted above, the reclaimed water appeared foamy and turbid within the chlorine contact chamber. Based on the number of improvements needed, it is recommended that the wastewater treatment facility be replaced. Recommended options are presented in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. U:F Ifif�T CLi JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 4-4 093010 4.4 SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE The existing operations permit allows for a surface water discharge of 0.1 MGD, AADF to Lake Placid Canal, a Class III Marine Water. However, the surface water discharge has not been utilized in several years. It is included in the new operations permit as a backup to the reclaimed water system. Prior to discharge to surface water, effluent is dechlorinated. 4.5 RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM The City has two permitted options for land application of reclaimed water. The existing 0.115 MGD, AADF rapid infiltration basin and the 0.152 MGD, AADF slow rate public access reuse system. The reuse system consists of irrigation of residential lawns, landscape areas, roadway medians, the airport, the school and a park. Approximately twenty (20) homes receive reclaimed water for irrigation. Reclaimed water service is provided at no charge. 7LW/slm/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt4P200-04546-10003 4-5 093010 SECTION 7 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 7.1 GENERAL Based on the system evaluations and regulatory requirements described previously in this report, potential alternatives for the water and wastewater treatment facility capital improvements will be identified in this section. Recommendations for other components of the capital improvements program can be found in Section 8 of this report. 7.2 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES The following subsection summarizes potable water treatment technologies that have been used successfully in water treatment to meet the established by FDEP requirements. This subsection includes a brief description of each process and the specific contaminants that can be removed or treated by that process. Improvement alternatives described below include: Alternative 1: Use of the existing water treatment facilities with new deeper fresh water supply wells, 2. Alternative 2: Installation of filtration facilities and use of the existing water supply wells, 3. Alternative 3: Installation of new brackish water supply wells with a membrane water treatment system. All improvement options are based on a water plant capacity of 0.5 MGD. 7.2.1 Alternative 1: New Fresh Water Supply Wells with Existing Treatment There is limited groundwater quality data available in the project area. However, based on the data that is available, there may be fresh water available from the semi -confined gray limestone aquifer, which would not be considered under the influence of surface water. Appendix H includes a report entitled, Hydrogeology of the Gray Limestone Aquifer in Southern Florida by JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-1 093010 the U. S. Geological Survey which has some information in the vicinity of the project. A test well at the existing water treatment facility would be required in order to determine if a fresh water aquifer exists in this location. For the purpose of this report, planning level costs for the construction of three (3) new water supply wells utilizing the existing water treatment facilities have been included in Table 7-1. Table 7-1 Alternative 1 Preliminary Planning Level Cost New Fresh Water Supply Wells with Existing Treatment Na. Description Planning Level Cost 1 New Water Supply Wells and Pumps $600,000 2 Electrical and Instrumentation $120,000 3 Site Work $90,000 4 Yard Piping $120,000 Subtotal $930,000 5 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $65,100 6 Contingency $279,000 7 Engineering $93,000 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $1,367,100 7.2.2 Alternative 2• Existing Water Supply Wells with Additional Treatment The existing water supply wells are likely under the direct influence of surface water (UDI). Use of these wells will require additional treatment such as filtration to provide protection against parasites commonly found in surface water. Disinfection provides the primary barrier against the transmission of waterborne disease for drinking water, but filtration is needed as a secondary barrier when water supply wells are considered UDI. Direct filtration refers to filtration without prior settling, and is the type of filtration that would be required at the Everglades City water plant. Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filtration systems can be used to adsorb organic materials for removal. GAC has a structure that is extremely porous which allows water to pass through with relatively low headloss, yet has a wide variety of pore sizes which can allow for small and large organic molecules to be absorbed. After some time period, the absorptive capacity of the carbon E-1 RAI E0 I JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-2 093010 will be exhausted. The carbon is commonly taken off-site to be thermally recharged or is replaced. Bench scale or pilot tests are typically necessary to determine the suitability for use with the raw water, the amount of TOC that can be removed, and carbon usage. Planning level cost information for the installation of a GAC filtration system at the existing water treatment facility can be found in Table 7-2. Table 7-2 Alternative 2 Preliminary Planning Level Cost Existing Water Supply Wells with Additional Treatment No. Description Planning Level Costi 1 New Well Pumps $90,000 2 GAC Filtration System $700,000 3 Electrical and Instrumentation $158,000 4 Site Work $79,000 5 Yard Piping $158,000 Subtotal $1,185,000 6 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $82,950 7 Contingency $355,500 8 Engineering $118,500 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $1,741,950 7.2.3 Alternative 3 • New Brackish Water Supply Wells with Membrane Treatment A third option of constructing brackish water supply wells was considered. This option would require the removal of total dissolved solids by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane treatment. Reverse osmosis membranes typically reject a large percentage of monovalent ions such as sodium and chloride. RO membranes also require a greater feed pressure to remove smaller monovalent ions because the membranes are characterized by a smaller nominal pore size. RO systems also require a means of disposal of the concentrate stream that is subject to more stringent regulations. Preliminary design of membrane systems requires computer analysis to optimize the treatment process. The software can help project which membranes elements can achieve the desired water quality, determine feed pressure requirements, and calculate the percentage of permeate flow at optimum conditions. Planning level cost information for the installation of an RO water treatment facility can be found in Table 7-3. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-3 093010 Table 7-3 Alternative 3 Preliminary Planning Level Cost New Brackish Water Supply Wells with Membrane Treatment No. Description Planning Level Cost 1 New Water Supply Wells and Pumps $750,000 2 RO Treatment Process and Building $750,000 3 Concentrate Disposal Well $2,000,000 4 Electrical and Instrumentation $700,000 5 Site Work $350,000 6 Yard Piping $525,000 Subtotal $5,075,000 7 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $355,250 8 Contingency $1,522,500 9 Engineering $507,500 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $7,460,250 7.3 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Of the three alternatives discussed above, alternative 1 will have the lowest operation and maintenance (O&M) cost, and the costs should be similar to the City's current O&M cost to operate the existing facilities. O&M costs for alternative 2 will be more than the City's current O&M cost due to increased energy requirements for pumping and regular replacement of the activated carbon. These increased costs will likely be in the range of 125-150% of the City's current O&M cost. O&M costs for alternative 3 will be significantly more than the City's current O&M cost due to increased energy requirements of the reverse osmosis water treatment process. These costs will likely be in the range of 150-200% of the City's current O&M budget. 7.4 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS For planning purposes, components of alternatives 1 and 2 have been included in the capital program described in Section 8 of this report. It is recommended that the City construct an exploratory well at the existing water treatment facility to determine water quality in the gray limestone aquifer. However, for planning purposes, the full capital cost of alternative 2 is l'3 Tic'I"R1)E0I JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-4 093010 included in the recommended capital program if water quality requires the addition of filtration to the existing water treatment process. 7.5 WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES This subsection will review the recommendations for the required 0.5 MGD wastewater treatment facilities. Everglade City's current operating permit issued by-FDEP includes stringent effluent limits due to the existence of a surface water discharge. The limits for CBOD5, TSS, TN, and TP are currently 5.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 1.0 mg/L, respectively. These limits generally correspond to a level of treatment known as "advanced wastewater treatment" (AWT). Less stringent limits are appropriate for spray irrigation of effluent; however, it is not practical to alter the treatment process immediately prior to initiating discharge, therefore, for planning purposes, it is prudent to assume continued provision of AWT. The removal of CBOD5, TSS, TN, and TP to the levels required for surface water discharge will involve the using one of the many modifications of the activated sludge process. Removing CBOD5 and TSS is relatively straightforward, and conventional activated sludge processes including aeration and settling can usually be employed to attain fairly high levels of removal for these constituents. Meeting a 5.0 mg/L limit for either these parameters would typically involve filtration or some other enhanced method of solids separation. Increased treatment involving removal of nitrogen and phosphorus still involves the use of an activated sludge process, however, anaerobic and anoxic conditions must developed at certain stages within the process to encourage the growth of certain organisms, and provide environments that will result in desired metabolic activities. These conditions can be attained by dividing the basins into specific zones or by operating certain equipment in a cyclical basis, as is the case with sequencing batch reactors (SB'Rs). This assignment is conceptual in nature and it is beyond the current scope to examine in detail every feasible treatment process modification that will provide AWT. Accordingly, this section only addresses conventional technologies that are routinely employed at facilities throughout the State of Florida that are similar in size to the Everglades City WWTP. Such technologies include: 1) a dual train package plant employing biological nutrient removal (BNR), 2) a dual -train membrane bioreactor (MBR) employing BNR, and 3) an SBR with appropriate phasing to provide BNR. Each process is discussed below. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 TOP200-04546-10003 7-5 093010 7.5.1 Alternative 1: Conventional BNR Package Plant When BNR is required at a small to medium sized WWTP, typically, some form of the "Bardenpho Process" is often utilized since it is well documented, reliable, and cost-effective. Brief descriptions of the two most common configurations are generally described below. 4 -Stage Biological Nutrient Removal Process: This process configuration is generally known as the 4 -Stage Bardenpho Process and it is usually used when effluent limits for TN are very stringent. The flow configuration for this process is virtually the same as the one for the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Process; however, another anoxic stage is provided after the aerobic stage to increase nitrogen removal. Also, a small aerobic or reaeration stage is provided after the second anoxic stage to increase the DO concentration of the mixed liquor prior to clarification to prevent further denitrification in the secondary clarifiers. The denitrification rates in the second anoxic stage are much lower than those in the first anoxic stage due to the low concentration of readily biodegradable organic compounds. The process provides high levels of CBOD5 and TSS removal and effluent TN concentrations as low as 2 to 3 mg/L; however, the process does not provide significant biological phosphorus removal. 5 -Stage Biological Nutrient Removal Process: The 5 -Stage process simply adds an additional basin to the 4 -Stage process. In this case, a fermentation stage is provided upstream of the 4 - Stage Bardenpho Process and the RAS is discharged to the fermentation stage rather than the first anoxic stage. This process is generally known as the 5 -Stage Bardenpho Process or the Modified Bardenpho Process. The fermentation stage provides the anaerobic preconditioning necessary to achieve enhanced biological phosphorus uptake in a later stage, like in the AZ/O Process. The subsequent 4 -stages provide CBOD5 removal, nitrification and denitrification in the same manner as they do in the 4 -Stage Bardenpho process. This configuration is used when effluent limits are extremely stringent. Usually high levels of CBOD5 and TSS removal are achieved and effluent TN concentrations are in the range of 2 to 3mg/L. Without chemical addition, effluent TP concentrations range from 1 to 2 mg/L. If lower levels of TP need to be achieved, a small amount of alum is usually added upstream of the settling process. Figure 1, below, presents general flow schematic for various BNR treatment processes. 7LW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-6 093010 Figure 1: Typical Continuous Flow Processes for BNR WWTPs L\fI1'E?[ iWVC ' dERO®C RiRIFIER EF£LL°E\T T\-1-1?mgll \r BiaPR[mo�'nl IA HA4 }}35 \1OD1F1ED LLT L1C 6-ETT=R PROCM 45TLL'E\'} FERyL :{TH.94 AFADg(C spy EFFT.[Z\I T\--?-12mg TF -1 2—L ]A Ai5 }ti:\S A4OPROCTSS IAELD£\T EIR4T W �••� SECO:D £EFL["£\T TN_25­,L �,� BE1FA. .vxaem sYvvc CUR1FlER No BeuPRe�mal IR R14 WAS } TAGE R:9 LET80 PROCESS LVii£\T J—" t]pSI. lFHO®E. gYCOD [L1R4IIA £FT 1-1 TN A\094 AIOVC TP=1'wg�L IR ' : MGEBAADF\TRO PROCF45 FLlEVT 4 o,ap n.w4 neop EEFLE\T o dFROHg i 4EFpHIC - 9EE®1C Li """ \o&oP Re�oovn4 R4S R'i5�,� STEP-EEEDH\RPROMS Implementing any one of the processes illustrated above, in a package plant is relatively simple. Appropriately sized reactors need to be provided along with the required mixing, aeration and solids separation facilities. In a small WWTP, circular ring steel or concrete tanks are usually very cost-effective. Under this concept two equally sized circular basins must be provided for reliability and each basin would include a concentric basin which acts as a clarifier. The annular space between the clarifier and outer wall is used to provide the requisite anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic zones. Further, the annular space can include segments for flow equalization and aerobic digestion, if necessary. External filtration facilities are needed in addition to the biological process basins to ensure compliance with the CBODs and TSS limits. Also, a separate dual- f'f, trot. T�CJi 7LW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-7 093010 chamber chlorine contact tank would be necessary for disinfection. The only disadvantage this concept is the space requirements when compare to an MBR configuration. The estimated cost to construct a full conventional package plant including preliminary treatment, circular treatment basins/clarifiers, tertiary filters, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $5,700,000. 7.5.2 Alternative 2: Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) An SBR treatment configuration involves a batch process instead of continuous feed scenario. There are numerous configurations of SBRs, however the most common ones include two or treatment basins with mixing, aeration, and decanting equipment. This allows development of anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic conditions, as well as intermittent quiescent settling conditions needed for solids separation. Typically, SBR's have four basic treatment stages which include: fill, react, settle, and draw. During the fill and react stages mixing and aeration equipment is cycled to create specific conditions that will result in the oxidation of carbonaceous material, nitrification, denitrification, and anaerobic conditioning that leads to increase uptake of phosphorus. The settling phase simply involves shutting off all mixing and aeration equipment for a given basin or cell to promote solids separation. Usually, the mixed liquor is allowed to settle until clear water or supernatant develops in the upper 30% of the tank. The draw stage most commonly involves the controlled removal of the supernatant from the basin. An equalization basin is routinely provided downstream of an SBR process to attenuate the peak flows that result from decanting. In the case of Everglades City, an equalization basin would be advisable, since filtration facilities would be necessary. SBRs can be quite reliable and cost-effective for secondary treatment; however, development of the conditions needed for the anaerobic preconditioning required for phosphorus removal could present some operational challenges. The estimated cost to construct a full SBR WWTP including preliminary treatment, rectangular treatment basins, secondary equalization basin, tertiary filters, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $5,100,000. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-8 093010 7.5.3 Wastewater Alternative 3: Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) A membrane bioreactor (MBR) is the combination of a suspended growth chamber or bioreactor followed by a membrane filtration, either microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF). In general, the membrane system replaces the clarification and filtration unit operations. The MBR processes can produce a high quality effluent, particularly with respect to TSS and turbidity. One general advantage of MBR over conventional processes is the small footprint which results from operating at high mixed liquor TSS concentrations and from the elimination of the settling and filtration facilities. Another advantage associated with membranes is the elimination of sludge settling concerns. There are currently two basic types of configurations for MBR treatment facilities. In the first configuration the membranes are immersed in the biological reactor. In the second configuration the membrane facilities are installed in a separate basin external to the biological reactor. Internal membrane installation is preferred to the side stream configuration for domestic wastewater treatment. The internal configuration usually includes aeration to maintain solids in suspension, scour the membrane surface, and provide oxygen to the biomass. Membrane life and fouling issues are the most serious problems associated with MBR treatment systems. Fouling can lead to a significant increase in hydraulic resistance and frequent membrane cleaning and replacement may be required, increasing the operating costs. The useful life of a unit membrane varies depending upon manufacturer. There is not an abundance of long- term operating data to support claims made the various manufacturers which introduces a level of uncertainty when evaluating this technology. Currently, data indicates that the average useful life of a membrane is approximately 7 years, which is a potential disadvantage of the MBR process. For the Everglades City WWTP, an MBR treatment option would be very similar to the process configuration provided under Alternative 1. A 5 -stage process with anaerobic, anoxic, aerobic and reaeration stage would be necessary, however, the basins would be much smaller and clarification and filtration facilities would not be needed. The estimated cost to construct an MBR WWTP employing a 5 -stage BNR process including preliminary treatment, rectangular treatment basins, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $6,700,000. C—'—) - zr--'I R!, IF, cri JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-9 093010 7.6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENACE COSTS The O&M costs for the three wastewater treatment alternatives discussed above should be similar to the City's cost to operate the existing facilities. 7.7 WASTEWATER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Alternative 1 is recommended for the City's capital improvements program. A package BNR process will provide a consistently high quality effluent and significantly improved operability over the existing facilities. It should be noted that if alternative 3 were selected, the City could potentially utilize a significant portion of the existing site for another land use or sell the property. The planning level capital cost differential between alternatives 1 and 3 is approximately $1 million. An analysis of land value was not conducted to determine if the land value would justify the increased capital cost, but may be a consideration in future analyses. r�--. �a.�'£'E'tliA T`3tl7 JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-10 093010 SECTION 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 8.1 GENERAL This section presents recommended capital improvements for the 20 year planning period. The recommended capital improvements program (CIP) should be evaluated every five (5) years to address population growth variations, regulatory changes, inflationary price increases and to update the status of the on-going capital program. 8.2 RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The recommended CIP is shown in Table 8-1, and generally includes the improvements described below. 8.2.1 Drinking Water System Capital Improvements Program Years 1-5 Exploratory Welland Treatment Improvements The proposed drinking water system improvements for years 1-5 include construction of an exploratory well to determine if a fresh water source that is deeper than the existing water supply wells and not under the influence of surface water exists at the water treatment facility, specifically, these improvements should include: • Construct an exploratory well at the treatment site in Copeland, • Evaluate water quality at the new deeper water source, • Perform pilot testing on the new water supply source, • Construct additional water supply wells, • Design and construct new water treatment facilities, • Consider interconnecting the Lee Cypress water system once the Everglades system is in compliance. Consumptive use permitting services are included in the CIP to address the request for additional information sent by the South Florida Water Management District in 2008. The recommended services include development of a numeric model, identification of wetlands impacts and providing the additional documentation requested. A preliminary project schedule for the exploratory well program can be found below: ,nom "'PaR'PESN JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-1 093010 TABLE 8-1 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Reeornmended 20 Year Capital Improvements Program Project :: CIP Years 1-5 'CIP Yem 5-10 CIP Years 10-15 '- CIP Years 15-20 >: Drinking Waters stem Improvements Water Supply Exploratory Well $300,000 Treatment Improvements $1,800,000 Treatment Plant Maintenance Im rovements $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 Booster Station Maintenance Improvements $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Consumptive Use Permitting $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $75,000 Lee Cypress Water System Interconnect $250,000 Subtotal Drinking Water System $2,950,000 $550,000 $550,000 $575,000 Wastewaters stemIu rovements Treatment Plant Improvements $5,700,000 Treatment Plant Maintenance Improvements $500,000 $500,000 Collection and Transmission Maintenance Improvements $250,000 $250,000Plantation =12$250,000 Island Master Lift Station $150,000 Plantation Island Inmmom ect $500,000 Sewer S stem Connection Pro ram $1,000,000 Subtotal Wastewater System $6,450,000 $2,400,000 $1,150,000 $1,100,000 Storm Water Master Planning Effort $100,000 TBD TBD TBD Total 5 Year CIP(Rounded) $9,500,000 $3,000,000 $1700,000 $1,700,000 SLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-2 093010 A preliminary schedule for the design and construction of the treatment components is illustrated in Table 8-2: Table 8-2 Preliminary Treatment Component Design and Construction Schedule Task Duration (Days) Start Treatment Option Review and Recommendations 30 July 14, 2011 Coordination with Everglades City 45 August 13, 2011 Pilot Equipment Procurement 45 September 27, 2011 Pilot Testing 90 November 11, 2011 Treatment Plant Design 120 November 11, 2011 Permitting 45 March 10, 2012 Bidding 30 April 24, 2012 Award Recommendation/Notice of Award 15 May 24, 2012 Pre -Construction Meeting/Notice-to- Proceed I June 8, 2012 Construction 180 June 9, 2012 Contract Closeout 30 December 6, 2012 Certification and Startup 60 - December 6, 2012 September 27, 2011 November 11, 2011 February 9, 2012 March 10, 2012 April 24, 2012 May 24, 2012 June 8, 2012 June 9, 2012 December 6, 2012 January 5, 2013 February 4. 2013 Following completion of the water treatment facility improvements, it is recommended that the Everglades City water system be interconnected with the Lee Cypress Co-op. The Lee Cypress water system serves approximately 250 homes and is not in compliance with drinking water regulations. Interim Operational Changes to Address Regulatory Compliance Currently, at the treatment facility, the City doses the raw water with free chlorine prior to the water storage tank and doses finished water with chlorine and ammonia prior to distribution. Changing this protocol to include an ammonia feed point to the raw water prior to the ground storage tank should resolve the TTHM and HAA violations on an interim basis. With a combined chloramine residual, CT requirements cannot be met prior to the first drinking water customer. However, if the City were to cap the center well that has on-going microbial issues, and operate the remaining two wells free of total coli form or E. coli bacteria incidents, the system would be in compliance. Once the proposed exploratory / production well is completed (anticipated 2011), it should be evaluated to determine if placing it online prior to treatment improvements would improve TTHM / HAA or CT compliance issues. r..... -: erax,-rscri JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-3 093010 Maintenance Improvements In addition, it is recommended that the CIP include $500,000 every five years for water system maintenance or renewal and replacement projects. Typically these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments. Specific water system maintenance projects that are necessary at this time include: Water Treatment Plant: 1. The float system in the ground storage tank needs to be replaced. 2. A cover is needed over the chemical storage tanks located outside. 3. Air conditioning for the controls located inside the building is recommended. 4. The windows in the building are in need of replacement. 5. An interior storage space is recommended. 6. The generator is undersized and has reached its useful life and should be replaced. Water Booster Station: 1. Ammonia system should be placed into service as soon as possible. 2. Fire pump was not operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. 3. Outdoor chemical storage needs a roof. 4. A control room with air conditioning is recommended. 5. The existing control system may require replacement. Capital Improvements Program Years 5-20 Following completion of the improvements identified above, the remaining capital program includes on-going renewal and replacement and permitting services. Equipment renewal and replacement should be on an as -needed basis, but some general guidelines can be found below. r rcraar II JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-4 093010 No. Description Frequency 1 Activated Carbon Media Replacement 6 Months — 2 Years 2 Above Ground Equipment Paintin 3-5 Years 3 Flow Meter Replacement 5 Years 4 Chemical Feed Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 5-10 Years 5 Ground Storage Tank Painting and Repair 10 Years 6 Filter Media Replacement 10-15 Years 7 Well Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 10-15 Years 8 High Service Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 10 - 15 Years 9 Meter and Instrumentation Refurbishment or Replacement 10-15 Years 10 Generators and Fuel Tanks 10-15 Years 11 Valve Refurbishment or Replacement 15-20 Years 12 Water Main Replacement As Needed Consumptive use permitting is included every 5 years and includes summarizing data collected at monitoring stations, preparation of required forms and required documentation. During years 15-20, addition consumptive use permitting is included as it is anticipated that the permit will be in a renewal stage at that time. 8.2.2 Wastewater System Capital Improvements Program Years 1-5 Based on the number of repair or replacement items noted at the existing wastewater treatment facility, a complete replacement of the treatment facilities is recommended during the first 5 years of the capital program. Additional details on the wastewater treatment facility recommendations can be found in Sections 4 and 7 of this report. In addition to improvements to the treatment facilities, it is recommended that the CIP include $750,000 every 5 years for maintenance or renewal and replacement. As with the water system, these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments. Specific maintenance projects that are necessary at this time include: 1. Electrical upgrades are required at the Chokoloskee master pump station. 2. The influent lines to both master pump stations need to be flushed to clear debris. 3. A valve vault is needed at the Copeland master pump station. iLYRA FETCH JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-5 093010 Capital Improvements Program Years 5-20 Following completion of the improvements identified above, it is recommended that Plantation Island be connected to the wastewater system. As discussed earlier in this report, Plantation Island is currently on septic tank, and interconnecting this area to the wastewater system would benefit the region. The remaining capital program includes on-going renewal and replacement. Equipment renewal and replacement should be on an as -needed basis, but some general guidelines can be found below. No. Description Frequency 1 Above Ground E ui ment Painting 3-5 Years 2 Flow Meter Replacement 5 Years 3 Chemical Feed Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 5-10 Years 4 Generators and Fuel Tanks 10-15 Years 5 Blowers and Electrical Controls 12-15 Years 6 Steel Tank Replacement 15-20 Years 7 Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 15-20 Years CORA TL 0I JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-6 093010 10, -?q I £ jm'ar �-000tJ Oc90^ JOCIOG @0 @,U OOOODGJU �S wz 3p ¢g �6 V W � On Qo P - ti V , 3e � 1, .. ° n' \ ��'�• 9 � a TARPON CREEK � � w r � z wI a o w /� i s w �— z I - _ - wo I -ed �• ��i � ' F- w o x u 3 w i w _ Cl w W / CJ v w a � J F nE gg Pg ;a gi ' aa9 a� 9� i F g r sg yirg ktl 5{H ei 5 t4 ?moi$ €Y �9 gPp a i6� a4 ig�ppy�46 �s q'q� �C� . i 3�`:.!:aHsaa:SRB=i p � ix3Y 99F. Pt p��9g::gA"n_9•+_vee €���iE�dgv� i€ Il z r g o Og 'a (fQ(� Y�y ul E 3 g .age 44 S Yq bk3� W F � U a SOW W g n U a N J a 3 w w ¢ w N w W Q a.O i E ry ry N S E� f R y z 0 � o o �Nr wLt:, F- U) o as man J a `On a i m W >'. N 'n�j. NM4k/CF" 2 Sly } r Q wrno U } co 0 w cr J {1J W Z cc w 0 W U W w d W LL CE J J i n O U�U J � -� NbMRIlX"' ��.:... ��HAMRICR�\" °i OHM. 1'. c9 3 ' ",g;• III a nn xmd p i y: Y ✓ 'i' 2 ;xa�34- A 1' ,, t 4�' Y �^f p N �f m ✓ Y ' t x J � 3 i1 r r x fix.= �` �".y` �.:t y • �{�y, HAMRICN W 2 W rF- F-Q) Ur W W Q 'S W W W U) W OW F - 0 O F L I,t y i It �{�y, HAMRICN W 2 W rF- F-Q) Ur W W Q 'S W W W U) W OW F - 0 O 2 In m N >- LOL— F- W U) C) (j) W LLI 0 U) < cc W LLI IT > A U) w IT 0 Iryi 14 2 In m N >- LOL— F- W U) C) (j) W LLI 0 U) < cc W LLI IT > A U) w IT 0 .. � � \ \Cl< ) \� \(/ 7 LU mo U) \ ( h k o _ w i.a y (l. l( JN\ CL r� e , �;3jat wiwsvr w Y � f u/ R k P. - 5 9 MAI 04) 2 c N 7 l ZC i w � (> `� »als ivnbr+r \ / 6V "i 0) 133110 k o _ i.a y (l. l( m w U) co z 0 Q o C O O U LL [[ N } dU)U QU) wao N Q h J Q W w cc� Z w U) a) w m a 0 O J 3 vanlva N F' I rT I a�a3n3 a 3 N33 133 1 I w � a Z L•€ G � g 8� � � 5 C � �v p� a •. m Q N j - LU QyU Q� w6=W N Q J c' W W CC > W N N W Ir a 3 O J w � Z L•€ G � g 8� � � 5 C � d ��� � y a � ' � � ��� � � � w • ' '1 i Ek O 000000000®000000 � O �v p� a •. m Q N j - LU QyU Q� w6=W N Q J c' W W CC > W N N W Ir a 3 O J d M LI H3x5 _ N 91 IIIHS 301p11911'YI =c-0000see 00 d w C7� l _ 133815 VIS338l. n r� � i } N e a O w r W tt J wc, .. ' W W ~ F U m UJ � I �I o a C7 3 r - '',. a W 9 3`= Et C ¢ W uj i i 0000000 g lr j 133H15 VIN3a8V9 9 =c-0000see 00 d w l _ 133815 VIS338l. n r� � i } N e Z O U 0 r W tt J .. ' W W ~ F U m UJ 4 �I o a C7 3 r - '',. a W 9 3`= ¢ W uj i i 0 lr j 133H15 VIN3a8V9 ] ƒ_0 mo < o o �dl( j \ S a E/( . . 22\ §... M LU CL 0)< < : LU - ��.� t} IK 1Ull a CI", � fid - •i���Y 1 ��Uv"��[ WIN W iVr,I ta� $�° 1 4f.. vi 41f��ti�vyv '�i1 1if � �iT1t # 4�i r I ti JI� 6 aky ME;�`7atMtt$IY y IBM a g� c Fill 1 4 + y ` � I ?Yh C� I �i I ( ,yl^1 � III Yqx 1��J r���•a 4 3 0 Ot P16 [�f ° �2� « 9: Rg x e v Z O F- U p W ir 0 O O -� [[ N } k-- W U Q U Q(N wao (1) J Q 3 cc. w w It > w N w w a 3 0 tlZ� JEbi N a, W = N11 �ygee a tEr 'ww-�mP es£x �4C'6.'J, y � Z 5 w O x n U t y v N O d C) ��R z [[ N } y WU TII NN N a J.: 2 WDza n W G J a W W QW :3W to W W C e ti 3, a "s _ oc �65C�£p£g�Ei °y 3 P - E J6 k B W w y tl��SW=F 4 N L� �, Wx Y ttl S=3zG tlZ� JEbi N a, W = N11 �ygee a tEr 'ww-�mP es£x �4C'6.'J, y � Z 5 w O h 4' U J cc N N O d C) ��R z [[ N } y 1 N a, W = N11 We N a z y � Z N O h 4' U J cc N N O d C) uJ +� [[ N } y WU TII NN N a J.: 2 WDza n W G J a W W QW :3W to W W C e ti 3, a "s _ °y s W y 'y 4 N L� �, Wx Y C m i[. � m 1 N W = N11 We N a J as Z W O 4' U J cc O 'r C) uJ [[ N } WU QN ¢N WDza W G J W W QW :3W to W W cc 3, a Ki s W A L N I 4 N L� �, Wx Y ~ii' a tp pp�nP � yi B � nom q§ Brc >GCcpE � WIN I � iil+�g v�WN r J 6 4 a 06, 57`.G G w a qd: s$�' 1 6W d z ail !I Aea, e U S 5 i A AAh e C$$ Oemri Nil .„qu Ze I �G R p y ¢ ��� Ii rl o $ f N �` �'Z� w'fleio a y®,�g$CG9€nn I B a w ZSN o W F o� �fl J zI Z 5�� $z u9@{J �gIr w w p 1 w —j � LL U � (r N} w W s Wp.UJ p 1 sE y a 1 o w w N $ "^ k. LiLt� o� 3$s�"<, �� to W NIT N k ��a aj R3 ;y n E b a $ O 1 a Eka @da.1 k"I- Ue a VRA $P o ¢ !4Id I 6 iti i i Q U � rn a LLLE ry � W n-1 b d Y 3c N 5l y I., v� y �l PB555 � y a v i n C �S o f p N 9 PL: d E9•• g I— C] �a� €� E, R.A. W O _ge;"m 55 a S ffVE' _11 38 R$e y ien5�1q ✓N� �` 4i� Y�e3.R'. X.H YiF� ^e�x U � Fol �� n� rtdoif vA '� pF ZN Q e a L tt E q^ G b d Y 3c N 5l y I., v� y �l PB555 � y a O^ @@ 60 '@ Oz O� UB3 Io- C@ /ry� fo. �'@ oS O' 4L ®d M. e 9 ky C �S g x3is Ip, c p N 9 PL: d E9•• g I— C] �a� €� E, R.A. W O _ge;"m 55 a S ffVE' _11 38 R$e y ien5�1q ✓N� �` 4i� Y�e3.R'. X.H YiF� ^e�x U � Fol �� n� rtdoif vA '� pF ZN Q b d Y 3c N 5l y I., v� y �l PB555 � y a O^ @@ 60 '@ Oz O� UB3 Io- C@ /ry� fo. �'@ oS O' 4L ®d M. U2 C �S J b d Y 3c N 5l y I., U� 3 O d o� e � 01 O^ @@ 60 '@ Oz O� UB3 Io- C@ /ry� fo. �'@ oS O' 4L ®d M. C �S le C �S J . e a L tt E q^ 3 Ers e a 3 E 6 c"�B FmiAi� erz g€gB� d°Gx a 9€amM ti ygHm51029WR W-3- Pg`s 'x2� W W <s33€i<c ga"zc.Csa$EYs>aras.aa@exp (n W Z F, O � w J O U. R WNY ¢ z I-- e A F- Q CLco w F". d P4 E p a 1 fir, cy, 3 a R aio IGO q p `o• d'�e OQ:0000 OOQ (( /FL p �1 g 6rFr+n`vSiii Ml i z I �. all 2 0 � � 5t pI��1 � "� � iO iY r • q�C p C � e WIN i W F— N Y N Z O w � o eP U LL 63�� lA W W F 3a Q U =N J G ¢d tl3 W d Q cc e �E cc F 7 4 w cr �6FF5 ]A9-9A�AF' �95g igg�gt�@ J p66pBB 99 9 A89$F BA i� p�@e j92 vaPAA �-FA 3a 8��5 i°i"p4p� e pEEy 0 [p0j6$8 p�aS�py I{IaI�I IIII' q O9 itlgp�5IM Lpli 9lEWSRs®ds6 � 6° a s sg ap Ie8�e8 �s 7 M $ U� msg �1 g 6rFr+n`vSiii Ml i z I �. all 2 0 � � 5t pI��1 � "� � iO iY r • q�C p C � e WIN i W F— N Y N Z O w � o eP U LL 63�� lA W W F 3a Q U =N J G ¢d tl3 W d Q cc e �E cc F 7 4 w cr �6FF5 ]A9-9A�AF' �95g igg�gt�@ J p66pBB 99 9 A89$F BA i� p�@e j92 vaPAA �-FA 3a 8��5 i°i"p4p� e pEEy 0 [p0j6$8 p�aS�py I{IaI�I IIII' q O9 itlgp�5IM Lpli 9lEWSRs®ds6 g p z: P y 'gyill p gc ./...��� .•� � � R� AE LieF �y F�]p� � G 99 vtt/ roe EVERGLADES CITY PUMP LOCATIONS L— . I I. . \\2 < \§\ �k �k} ) a. COO \(\'\ : \\a\ . �/\ : LL §a . ;/2 - Lu E"o \ \ § z c ®!0 o)t; 6 0 -IA.\ w;)S \$(}`p. ) O'D K j . a;. ... /\ &( «rew.z Ho «� \ ()z . L— . I I. . \\2 < \§\ �k �k} ) a. COO \(\'\ : \\a\ . �/\ : LL §a . ;/2 - Lu E"o \ \ § z c ®!0 o)t; 6 0 \ w;)S \$(}`p. ) O'D K j . 4- /\ &( Ho \ ()z . �)) ))o ./ �� cg > a `\ �- . \\2 < \§\ �k �k} ) a. COO . �/\ : LL §a . ;/2 E"o § z - ® ` Z ®!0 o)t; 6 0 \ w;)S \$(}`p. ) O'D K I / . z 0 / 0 0 u j 0 ƒ \ \ ZD) \ ( } $—= z /\ &( ! v �k} » ------------------------ a — — — = §)A ' \ <\\ o \\)\ § (\\ / ))j (\(( !\( \/® [{\ <\2 of /\ &( ! �k} \� /\ § 9f /r0 §)A ' <\\ o \\)\ § (\\ / ))j (\(( !\( \/® [{\ <\2 of . IL mEo G®\a ®°&o ) o±=A u E {//{ |0 ` j§/% ; Emla §ii \ ) \ /\ &( �k} k\LL § 9f /r0 §)A ' <\\ o )/) § (\\ / ))j CL o- !\( \/® [{\ <\2 of . IL mEo G®\a ®°&o a o±=A u E {//{ |0 ` j§/% ; Emla \� o ! z 0 / 0 0 u \ 0 / 2 \ } \ ( ( LO IL fl. LLI a- 0 0 cc a I J 2 W � J � 1Q - K � J W 3 3 £ F a > a � a z � w � u o ti 3 z z x w rc 0 w z u u wl I I o ci a t - w w a Q E.0 0 o r- 00 0o v I- , O � ¢ C � N c LL E m Z V y� w a mz �0O > L' �O m �Ua m° w z �o i UOw ,J m or > 0. `N N U�Y C3 m � d C o_ m� �y m � C D GJ y LU az z O PF w m0,¢ x riNNUO W j A prLI rL Q i I / � I L- I X-4 I J 2 W � J � 1Q - K � J W 3 3 £ F a > a � a z � w � u o ti 3 z z x w rc 0 w z u u wl I I o ci a t - w w a Q E.0 0 o r- 00 0o v I- , O � ¢ C � N c LL E m Z V y� w a mz �0O > L' �O m �Ua m° w z �o i UOw ,J m or > 0. `N N U�Y C3 m � d C o_ m� �y m � C D GJ y LU az z O PF w m0,¢ x riNNUO W j A prLI rL u & ' , E �2 \ [o } \ \�� LL, § } c \))\ % ~ y - .z \ \ \ } \)§} 3 t-/ R a!0ƒ < \\ §/0 §_ \/ k\ ) a (uLL Z E t / \Ci \\ / r#a � \{ ° ( § °K\f iU® :0 46 � $ I ] /- 2 ) / 2 �x —' - {\( ~` ®z / 0\\\ \ . e=,o e \ I _\, }\f§f�: |) .. `�~ LL,\/ . e , I �.. \� � ( . - I § / / p ;§ ^� — @! \\LL \ ^ ��^ } ma\ k ` z §\}\� 6 § \ / §a§] Z §ii > & I \ > #§§A $ ° . § \ \)§j § ) 0!\+( k/a; /\ E( . \\0 � I � (� } \\\ )// * 0m; LLJ� � \*_ e /Qi /\7 ƒ ( L^� $ 7A . )/§ \§ / - \\/C) ) , I �.. \� � ( . - I f i D { z 0 \ 0 0 u \ LU 0 cc s ) \ } \ K } - �I (\\\ Lu w - ) \ \ {] $/ \/0 kk/ of § \\\ / 3 i 2 0 \ 0 0 �\ 0 \ / \ \ ) } ( ) —�x--c--7 d § _ ( I $/ I.m I I [ § ' � � .---�– - -- d § _ ( /\ $/ //) (m/ Bf § /\\ [a . /{) La / /) § \\\ � 7\I !/( 7!® § Pa® {f 0 .. * $ ) ! 0� I ): \ o)gF- 0 - ) 0 $I o > ;) Em2) \ ]] \ ( z \j\ / �` }/ l �z ----�°,©E �§6 �� \ w Jek@ i § ■■;f ® e § §oma• } ® \: 0/Li d §\kk Ecc� J} $ // � )} . (/> -- !aZ S\� co 4d *\\ o Z/) § f �� 8-H ) �/ n. \ ' , )\{ IL 73` \ 0/\ ) §\§ 3)0- [ --- --�--- -- §f)2 §){/ ± + \\{LL S o o ' U X a 8 � eb c as s sa �y J N Z 7 0 a 3 a a s ° a 0_ p u s Ch Q LL % iii V - Z C Eft a 3; z y LL i O Z Zs d - D L `— - LLJ cc o M 0 V m LLI Q a 7a0E- O G C) NZ m0 O Q LL O o° E aLL y:W M Z o =a trw � Q�8 ¢U o rc o co 0 U ° W _ W ro C Q N � � - Z o O c m I' Z` wiz z z On&F .1Qc ° U W >qco� a . a W o o ' Y a � •/' z C ty V a w a n z ��a 0 CC o d) 9.± s b e' Z C m H J ! (7 w 4� o ;� Q(D Q. �/ W I z ®.' W Zm L GG m m g N M o 6 O ,Cr ° ®rm a w rt yy, G G CL A o. Q y o P O y- �0.Oh m o Ny m0 6 0 Q a II O U. N Z ��P o m is � QUA W ma m o Z c w 0C-) T- W w U Z UO ro � J w mei J � y amm gw aoP- U .J = m o U Q' i g z oa O W ¢ C Q 8 4 ay 3 y 0 � O G 0* o ® n LLv a z K E o W Z Z d c 7 0 W g t C U W e N I W IL IL o v fi q - (; \ C) \ \ \\\ \ (\ \\ 2 E ! m <22 § \ \ \ w� /0 LU \! & (a-0 ;i /a $f . \\ \ {\$ \)) ( - #?® a \ \ § \ \ « Z `2 \ ^ $ - / \ j \\\ ° E z &2 \ i I 4 o ._ . ~ o§: \ \ \ P4 3 { . . ' 6 -- --- 0-3 C) °/te w \)j/ / -_-- — ----- - 0 FL \ SI -- ----� S �Q S� - --- ! — �— -- -- - � [ �,x \ g/\K\ .� A \)\§ 5 . /ii° \ _ z ) <;r; \ j § \/2� ~ °#§) i y� LU 0 \o\} ~ - \)Ix )7 $/ . k\) ( ) � Sw/ )$\ ®/2 » \y \\2 m ^� k/. \ §j tN \ \ 2 \f— < S `` / §{\ / \\f § a / (\/ / . \ .\�\\ - \\\2 M \ SI -- ----� S �Q S� - --- ! — �— -- -- - � [ �,x �«\ � . (( }\ /�. / / \ )! \ } . \ ®~® }�` =7\:; § §® km /' °� - ° I ;§` t §E %` /E \ LJJ 3 \ Os I0CL } \; U CL \ IEE §IL _ -{} )\ $o \a) go �LU �! aim 00 §)± X50 B • D L) E \$G , § o §*\ , < S ® . za) .\ //2 ./ ƒ b)«. ) t}80 \ _ )]_0 % . a;)g ® ) (L . \\\(L _ . ,. . R ±7¥t M �«\ � >: � f . 7 S)§ \ / \§ � \��° \/ § _ �\ u <�E§ \ kk§®IL 00 °t[) ex 4 ) 0!B» - < §Za/ § ^ 0 . }§ ))_ (§> \Eu \{ ( 0 C) • §§! / �9 LU < Q �e � (^C ) z/( ; Ea _ .(|q\ ,f §g • n . Z»&G [ $gyp _ (\{ILLI . —°—C }7) [ 0 >: � � I 2>\\ _• . 0 F- )/ M / \\\ § lzu e r< } ~ I a ) E >.99 <`7; / - ®�� - § ` .3: ))«2 ° ~ t- ° & { \ ®t50 u \ !; L)![! \ ]/a; \\ /\ ' c< \ // \\\ ^ .\5\ ( 47w )00d t \)] g-! q \ CL0� o / \ \ t/\ z \R $' ~ ) $#� ` ` / . \ ' p LL %f[ §\,, b±). «/;§o . eƒgip c f3/G \ �}=p \ � I , , & ' \ _ � \ - o \ii°� R ) z & \ /` \ G s \! §kf //); ® K \\ \§ /)§ c $ .§ TTv , ~ w \\§ } \ ) 46 x //\ za± � \ \ w�\ - 0 ƒ ° :� of \\ \ 8 U ^ N o g R � w Gs R O Y o 3 a N C U 4 w O 00 H K d W W } z u m r cc 0 oY 0 „Yw w I E z Gee® �— ® I I w ��a0 + CL J a LU X 0 1 in 7 1 Wr Z SIM a [ w e U O NR C fr Ell W prj EL H I QS N 2 No 4 F oe6 m � g C 0 CD E c w � adz Y W a on o • � U n W °N LU s o a >UJ Q C4 y n. w W a 0. ® e L LL m a — z 4 E o LUiz Z N Z O n o F W c 00 ? OOCL i oe O O § § � 0. §II | 2 ||§ /()$ § BOE B 2 |■ k \/ \d/ )\ § § ƒ \■ z 7 (. / ¥ — m uj R «|� / §i! ! z & 2 z .. , . § ) & ! § .• ; § § 2 CL {0 IlL ° E, 2§ $( . . . /\\ )ƒ# - 22. 2)$ . , 0 . cc, 1 ( /\0 K . t ( /\ k LU § (A a- 0 \I` ] §fk » / \§ \\ ° � ~ §�) E ) � ' \ U0 _ . j �f / \k)} . E /)b§`- ƒ~r - rm= & \ C3 � o j LO C o ® z4 w9 NU 9RR a w C _— ---FJ Z z w 6 yZy 3Q� ( Dr 0 Y i O O/ Oy� i Er9iy i LM N 0 ECL d F G y -00 p U y < Ci NLO_ 6 � 1 O N u � O ui u�� y Nw C N Z C O ¢tea roo W Q OUa w Z i U ro W h- 8 a m _ W \_ I C 0 0 L eoc Q N N ( o W A O O 0 0 oV N 0 C Q LM N .�Nr J .0 G 01 p O d H �; x f O[ J N9 z CA 6 Q C Z N U m 7 7 m a Z c a ? 00 9' o z CLe ' w m m m� ..` a:w z > r p 0 \ � d�zw I w w m O U C , $ 076.Uh O c w fH c>u N Z O Bbl^ c K m G p yCZ LU 015 m m o W Q I O U p w I J ® J m > ' jwv 0. 'b m m= co t3 Com' 'o m W } b 0 wiz° z N z O� 4 C m d O d i w eO W | t� z ) §\ k| R z § /§!. i ® % §j§( ! ��I E (L.. ` 9\� R \|§)§ )l § r. § LU 0 ) \ }o .{ Ro u `! \ƒ// r= |§ ; .. }z �\§ ()( --� . \\{ • §)t ` C) \ }; /0 § R (\1 c � © � )§} ±//0.. � . {u cc \\\ � °±f). . $®!§ � oa,g m ®®G § �)& }k/ § A k 0 CD / ] i | ..0 \ § M k � ) —===::I-4--= k a B / r v —===::I-4--= k a B / ts k |1j � � ) ) [ ) m � § ) I § . � \\§( �(§§& I �§ � \ � § ) I § z 0 � Q 0 u e 0 � � m � M ( cc CL a --c= w k � § § • @ (!! : !{ . ${S / ! k 12 § °g }� z \R\\ # LL /\§ CL 5§ E �e7 .\i. x &, . .� \ \ 4&2 �� k°, ~IL°� §§ z 0 � Q 0 u e 0 � � m � M ( cc CL a --c= w k � § § ] t31I« MA M� E � I B x, 1I' E � I B ) b 0 E 4--- C- --T � k § § & j \ § § \ 0 ;j §! q 2 §|§) ! u io LULLI . \ \ , 0 \0 !! J \/// t| , E, ) b 0 E 4--- C- --T � k § § & j \ § § \ 0 0., z 0 F- 0 0 u U w .0 cc a \ k LL � k B ( / \ \ § ) b 0 E –==::z? -4--= § § ) k § . f \§!N. z< \}�) 0 § ( LU § § ) k § ) § § m § \ % d cl § / 0 k - • $! |! Q - . ; / 2.0` z w§=\ . o§ I § }§ ` `� co 0} § { | k ssm0 0 �{CL \L . §!4/ E_ |§ -x� a§ ) § § m § \ % d cl § / 0 $ . . : LL ;()§ 7 . /��l \"•- 0 0�2 \ ��! \{(\ � 9£k/ e e= |§ . | /! - k § § // \\( (k/ ®%/ \co §¥# < o// 0 (\) eta �Al cu 0 }/0 igC z4CL Amo >]§+ \±f§ \\/0 ,1 ?,2 !()/ k § } ( LU � 2 k c k § } k § ( n [ ) k § B i . a ■— § — — — 2 &. / \\}§] § §�` .\ /i.° m 7|i. d ))/& IL § § k|w! � |■ moo.,. t {) 2 \/)/. \ . E_ . . /) k § } k § ( n [ ) k § B ¢ R§ )\){ e| _ 2� % k ( ; ` _ �} ,! . »:!. § ) \ . �� a �. a/Jt§ § \ti > 2 § @ <e, § z IL \ 0 « "{§ }�\# / |§ aCLo; {\ $( \\} ()( 5 \6± \ \/\ ° \_z \\\ § / \ § § )\) ) 0 §1j /%« Z/( } M� ;az LU ( (77 0 » Ecr. - -- -- -- -- . ym2 ® ° . k/)z. , > z . 4`Eo k 0 ( uj R4 n-I_ — \k/CL IL 2 § \ § Vq t—\— —�_---= 6 LU 13 § w ) . 7)!\ \j\) 2\'\} )j. 6 LU 13 § w yIa r. Q cc T O m 0. W z cr r w ccW h ww I J W � Y 1 S W Z � J a a a a a a r a a a u ® w z u 2 w O WI W z cr r w ccW h ww I 2 z 0 ¢ 0 0 u LLI \ 0 _ � � | § Ll �2---C= m m § « k \}\\ §)§K � I _ cc _ a ƒ\ \§ \)} � \ca} \0 Fg® § « k § k%! � \ \\ § � A °I. ■ . 0 6 §a)§ % §� § I >■;_; a L | lkfj ) 0 ! § ) |! aL § \k/ #� !§ \/ $§ k®/ c �4� `8f af � !)z \\ °( ) \ƒ\) �#\ a 0 § \\\ WN c g )/( //( � )\\ J D- ` EL del - I CaL. - o y§e ;a -37©K 3 Cc (/\ \ s p/� 1'/ o O 71 d V g LL I c a °gym J I z CL cc W LU "% a t y p O ticc 'm mo w < ` o V m 4 a° a E o NG.O TZ mo 'o F. O C Q Ego E nZ _ e 3t;� a �. W r az 0 o c O U r M z c 0Ua ;- ? O Q ® J 7 a 10 F � 8 I W ® cc r a CL � a be lu 0 ® Z 7z Z N z ?q O 6 L cU W N N OJ 'cease. > O O A^ NLij a F 4 N U r i . g . §u/ }/\`CD _ ��\ R k *|( f |a}§ CL = 2 | LLI¥ <;�® ) ! § ,x> @ §, S / w k LToo % . . r \)} \mj \ r )\\ /\) (/ƒ \ ) 2 ,. § \( g \ , o IL IL z;± LUcc , § I LL }\( >®fZ 0))( _ § , FR — \ ` » §\\\( 9b$} ( . . . FL *@ @ | - . . w z ƒ \{!! $| ^k\\\ o!, } \) {�� 0 §/}\° f} \ R ƒ §oc§J R||\ w t §a.LLI| ` } Otto R !■ ! [ ƒ{ \ 7�GA .` . x )9 !\ �/ \§ 42 0 _ ()k \)$ \ } i ,. a* ))/ �-- ; \\\ w )«; i C) : m \ \\> \ E \ � \ 04} ;� £..° • . 0 !/( \) E ƒ , ) « LL CL \ ± l)) $®§3 6 02=P u § 39§% > _ f : z a ? Z O til U 4 Ex aui ami W O z mwa c Ezw p / w I t w 06 a a >`�z� f` /' J I i CL W w zy a d / ^ M ,% ' W W N z WO_ O ro- of of mw -p E c u_ 8 t w _ N Ill G � O ° Q y � O 1 W T � m m ° W pU w Z°I U m W ® °s O— Q a 2m W V rn Sa w ® P� On Z ° m= pLU cc t t ° ® a ( CC ° Q o b d I � W ? Z Z N Z v U p 8 Q d Li W a $t NU j o o Z U iL A k§ §!{ . |. ;!■! 't 2 § CL |! /2 \ \ §}{!, ,, 6 §li | CL \j \ . \\\\ / « " «- 2 No / !) )7 . jo ENO ()$ • �,�-, , ®{\ ` . r60 { \ § 38»Lu ] ;LU §7\ ` 2 / ( ) S � -z 0 --- - E . a z . ccI % 7 ( tt). _ - $�&zo±=e \ !/§) - \\\y � � t I co \{{\, � �It 0 qe !t LL \ \I�°� /..\§\ / § CL . � 0 01 V) § .#_ !Z& ! 0 &( k\) k)( �7) - CD ST $e / §<2) ] \f a o g //\ a$ ® % (/\ o ; °' QL §\)( b)). 2 ®k§ k . 0 m § t{ m K ■| 9(!, §kz ; ww k P §§§; .a ���IU .§� ` \�' R {||� U.§k§ i�°! ) CL§ U. � !§2` » § 2 & 5 | ° k/r} w k " t((I \ §zaa _ |§ ,§z wow ({$ \%/ \/§ B{a �){ / 0 rt 0 \ }� lw \/> § \ � � q e ( -% z-0 \ \ } \\ ƒ P,@ a. \A2 /\ §f ) (04Z 6 o)gP tk/\ > a,f _ �0(_ ! ,Q/ § f�% � C � N g Q C v N tr) G a 'c per, w w C 4 3 Z a g e a N �M0 o NZ �b o�Q N N E k Q E tL � m 9 � mz t3 c 0 w n m "° ww FmUl ® � O a„N � � m lit U i T --- —--------. I- d 16� EL W \ {� o a G NrN O _ ti 1 cc d _ j W CL Z -oz w ° w N Z _ A Q w N N Q w 0 LU N a O > D \ 2§, ) § § k �L § z# §ƒ) m= " !§ Ra ±§ ( w z Bf z £)> §co . k// / m > § )/f t+ k 7/{ § [ §f\ 0 E `IL37( q �..:�-------� 3#). z a .z ())/ k _ ( i t§ � # kI / z .. §|\m n 01 E>■; w& CL \I|� ° z OM ' I ] § 0 { » .& \ ` R/)/ ° Ea () . . k\0 {]/. .T S{$ �7a j \ _ //f 2 - -- --�����, m . / / �` � // (ae 2 • § g §\\ \ �---- \ \ ) q .), Z/( CL. . ¥ § zoo �� E /` ` zfƒ --- - ——fk. ) a (k}( \ [� § . . .E .. .. c LO j§!. < $2 z � ` LL \ ~ z § .k}k -, Q. § � 3 ! z i2)k � 0 ! § ) s0e ] | k !� ]#{L � \ !/3/ ƒ\ | . f/ . .k\) k// - . Bt/ \\0 8 &_ » . \\\ § E Z\ \ \\ o x? / )\\ • o ( cc ( a: ƒ ] /g§ _ _a[ �Z) ( (a/§ \f& w ) {Of0 - \. Ea &0\\` . . §§/ % LU . meas o p�y J tV n� z J Lo V O ? z z ad y N P W a 0 I I O Ikf gyp] e a a w (9 m m I t z W 0 0 -6 0 W �® o O v s°o ui to CL w vP`,0h E O Z 00 4 � E WE m a Q w w �zw I a S= 16o W Z �_ c EE 0 a e O U > ® U c W ro � • 7 wW.. d VQ od o G FL � i rower Q C Z N a a�b a Ztm � w ? z° Nmz Of a O W cc W W N Nrr Q W a FIL O O I N = w 6 ' d N"Q �\ k \ � ( ( \ \ . (1 \ \ � )\\§ . 2 . � � !)mm . § ■ Ea!« . � | LU i 0 §li LLk\, \ /£a f CL » / | ) J§;2 e\\D ® / | \//} ! ... _ o12 �\ k \ � ( ( l � \ \ . (1 \ \ � )\\§ . 2 . � � l � (1 )\\§ !)mm Ea!« LU i 0 §li a--= m [ § A \ ) a \ � | 2 z % k\\ « )§ / �� z\ alum o « \§ o �� a \ $ { § & /§ a = m e/a@ § . | 0 ! �\§\ ` ° 2 |!, .\ - ) L:3 \tea/ . |] 0 I a--= m [ § A \ ) a \ � ■ ) \\\� \ °k ` § \V \ \§\ ` l 3 ?S !�§0 ]i. > & ! j ! k § s § /t$- w « ■ to , /£ ate §$ \§ ■=E E\z \0 - \\ § K\) % / ��> ¢ 0 `°'§\} . \ � &f \ � \ } \/� \\ Ed) «i; . § E §\§ - z \ }. (/) $®!§ n)gp A . &®/S /CL . - §\/( . . Z /30 § o )\t§ §! o R { z §!§) 4z I W�§f§& \ - I ,2 �k / ) o ! | § 0 $#!) @ a e , � ! Ln _ in ! § \/ . f/ . t5k0 E=0Z Etu -) \e\ (/\ U [£R t § § . (\> CL 0 //( &.� �e q) .S 2 • ] $a{ . .. ±$>, (� (k)§ § !®§G % i®2g < .)}4) § . 2 0 � 0 0 / 0 0 _ CL ) a. § § Lu / § / §i 9 � b _ {! • ! ,f - . m.■ , #: q !§,! );)\w CD § )�� � {L: 0 ) } \f r / x ) uH � §£ok )$ § . 2 0 � 0 0 / 0 0 _ CL ) a. § § Lu / § / §i 9 � 2 CL 0 (L % k u \ ! o � ! I f � � S ( I o � ! $ I Ll IL cc CLI 2 0 F- 0 0 u \ LU 0 _ _ ) LLI § Di m N tr ( § \ / \ k § } ! - ( } / \§! \ ■ .# LU !C) � E�� \ 2 /\/ . ©far \ ) |, 2•!+ )\J/ !} 2 0 F- 0 0 u \ LU 0 _ _ ) LLI § Di m N tr ( § \ / \ k § } f � LU U x, � a --C= 00 m. N Oki i z 0 � 0 0 LU/ 0 0 ¢ a. I � E� _. y yT, , x e § ) CL 7 (/§\ ul a §i| $ § I- z 0 � � 0 u F- 0 0 E i t / I� rs § LU /\ $( . \\j E =w B-} /LU r r=2 � \§® ` /\ \ � \/\ § \\\EL \3® )\\ )}) /)/ m)), $"§3 o)gw § Q %/$g 0/\ƒ ca & mm=/ \ a W! § ( § z 0 F- 0 0 F- 0 u 0 _ a - ) § j ( ) \ }1 \ 7 . _ k z§ \ i||\ )! / R>>4 §| !`$\ /z ( �E 0-/ | w )eur -j /@{ � §; k kc §!ate e= .\ z 0 F- 0 0 F- 0 u 0 _ a - ) § j ( ) \ }1 \ z 0 � 0 0 / Q 0 Ir I � E ) Cc k §Lif } k § k k / \\� \/�/ uj o .\ CL § | = 7L: ®m IL/ii , © &)U. & ! \■ k Qi\\ )ƒa; .§_ ,. a§ z 0 � 0 0 / Q 0 Ir I � E ) Cc k §Lif } � \ z § LU � 2 Q j a § LU � I § . u G : §! 3 ■f» # ` ®� CL k \ a\f® ^�® 10 °%Z a=`� §I. w \ | § /\/x � 2; � \ z § LU � 2 Q j a § LU � ! § § § § { _ \ «| ■� . � \(!� a z ! | § /k\\ ;- ¥`)/ cc avr § } $ f 0 C" !§i w J/c E®7 z i` � a | g ■ ! � � ! §/\\ ��a ' %{ _« (!o/ i§ E, ! § § § § z 0 R < 0 0 / 0 W a � � CL � � § 2 ) § \ � § )� k \ c k � §! _ �� � \ ��]§ ■ ) §. LOft � k/m z �� #|§ K § 1 I , o ; ■ ° LU I a � \ � � } }}\� � k \ \ \ . { = - . 02 (ƒ |\ . z 0 R < 0 0 / 0 W a � � CL � � § 2 ) § \ � § )� k \ c 2 0 F- 0 0 / 0 w 0 _ CL ) § / j § / § m LU \ / k § \ R§ cc § /§§/ § f-°� C )333 y & a | @ B ! § ��.® e0 _ §| )o.o E 2 0 F- 0 0 / 0 w 0 _ CL ) § / j § / § m LU z 0 e 0 u \ 0 Ir CL �Ed� »B § ) � � ) ) § �. § | \ to CL ; J\{ \t\ \j/4 } g f® tL \ �C) LO § ` | \ ~ / |« kƒA{ Z z 0 e 0 u \ 0 Ir CL �Ed� »B § ) � � ) ) § �. § a � RR ddg K p J M 00 f� O tJ ¢- N C m U n a z ? C* 4' N p, E �6 i O .1.d.. U z I I z LM COO LU �'3 w zjR � a �•J � Ul O s CE s �H r w ago. a B a v V0} i o c M m0 v `o CD ova a�V0 E c u. E t Z N w 8 � w ° Z �_ co 0 U ro Q w I U o V N C W N I w ° d Z o� rn� 0Ui 0 a3� cc ® c c cc (L Q R Z w z o2go-° 0 s N y U w N 4) w ain ƒ — - - v— w� : . .y _ � . . 75 m k| § U. b ! § ) /4i % §, k kf(L § $Io/ E_ ^ . $/ \ #)0 ®®� EZ .ri » - - )@§ § _ \ § E (\\ § p IL _{ \ n \� \}\ « ¥ § ,0 0`/ S - - _ ®{i °°cc L\/ \k \a \kjq ± CO &) — - - v— w� : . .y .� E C p� T 6 "�qL ppk h 7 z d N? w w y Q S Q 2 2 Vi c ¢ W I c 6 P k < m ro y e N d J I 1 j �g 6 � �. w o U) a 0. d 0 w p41 ~ O 9 Q. 0 1- m $ NO O � Q Z N 90 E N Z � vw c m Z oi�: 0aO z 'eo >ell z¢ w ° p d o 0 w p: p' Zoo 0 '�j � LS a W 4 N z Uro O m> w > p " ( w a o � Z OLLI� ® o \ I ix G G 0 CL 0 `��\ o o LL N Z �y \ w �z \� goo oA �� w �T _Q y i y U cc N 5 w \ ( } k [ ( .� �§§§; (!! § §�|°) m. . cc j �- $ ]E z . q0 7 z = § @)§\ \ @ E \ \ \)/ § } z !�\ ae> .LU 2 | > 2 @ ; ■ ` Din / ); }{// } �! )£o/ E_ |§ \} . �5 r kk/ ; E=z `+ )i : o . - :c{£ .. ) » .%\ � Q >j /\$fw CC ))e q z ` § g — S#\ R §jj (L //{ % , \ ze± \ } / . \ . ./ E I z/( . .� Zo- �,0 ®°+°Gi I 2�GG . / '^ \\0CL \ /o )&cu D- ' � . FL -0\/ § % - � § § 0 7\ . OC)cc) I |! E k}/i� In $/$ \;/\CL / & ! § )0 @ LU §Z 00 {a !§ [/ �k\ a \)i 14 @ 00 $ z ^ , - ) ] 2 w g [\ g » ] | a. °\),° % I ]t\ LU .k E ?°\ � 6�« I $�4z °/g& U may' {\ {\. LU . . FL :3a o i � , § \ m K #o I IN k / LL lk k! ) �§ (` © Ems§ / /0 � ,§ 2{(ƒ )i a7 #o I IN ! (` §;(\ � \ z 0 0 W 9 0 cc 0- r1l Q O. 2 A N Z 00 O Ra L m�0 Eaz W Z 0 0O 0 m o 0cc Z 0U+aaw' I -N9 > Up 0 W LM p a m ro m � E � U ani N 1�3 m z oA C Cm CL Eo wZaz ZZ�sy N � Z 7O -0 s cU HI N y C C u m m m rn>o mrn�=m aNvm� i J W � J � Y J W o a a Z 1 W a Q N Z 00 O Ra L m�0 Eaz W Z 0 0O 0 m o 0cc Z 0U+aaw' I -N9 > Up 0 W LM p a m ro m � E � U ani N 1�3 m z oA C Cm CL Eo wZaz ZZ�sy N � Z 7O -0 s cU HI N y C C u m m m rn>o mrn�=m aNvm� "am O � v � g F M 1Q� r 2mm U Zw 01O p Iw vL � d 3 u � ;a} o ® g c a 5 v a M�0E- a w � � w u � a 5 a a a $ d W W Lu I 1 0 w k \ 0 & J \ i Ll ) ( Er M . Z�3—a--= �\)} §§\\ \§I! i'°� § j cc \ . Z�3—a--= IL M 2 CL E 00 0 Q --I_L� r - - - w p J o °e FR IY v J ® I °A1 t( C � 6 e,1 ° U _ UJ _ ° M ° c e � aDw w I , j Oa jOD O D7 cc WM Q Q 1.L E q 6 o {O O Q qL C L5 y� 'C T IL Q. 0d,O G QGQ QQ 1 P lye, Q R f MaaI^ IL M 2 CL E 00 0 Q --I_L� r - - - w p J o °e FR IY v J ® I °A1 t( n u a e,1 ° U _ UJ _ ° M ° c e � o IL M 2 CL E 00 0 Q --I_L� r - - - w a J ly FR IY v J til � a n u a a F a a a z z 1x.3 z � o w I , ! §. \ k I -==Zzi—y--= Z. I b w J � Q J WTN K n a a w z w u W,E z Cc w a.. 0 D F. z 0 � 0 0 ./ 0 u 0 _ CL fl� $i k ( ] ! � — a---<= cc cc LU § � \ � / ) � �\|\ cc cc LU § � / ) � �\|\ );k\ LU \ I� cc cc LU § � § & 7 D ± { ( k [ ) r�± � ® z- \?/ a ! i kof ! 2Ea a § 0>) �)} )\\ k�|\ �\\ [\( 5)+. !|m, \ 0 m 3);a §qk° &®t§� >oIL /})( §� D- a c 0} § d § ! k [ ) r�± � ® z- \?/ a kof § 2Ea a § 0>) �)} )\\ �\\ [\( 5)+. /®R/ \ 0 m 3);a m &®t§� >oIL /})( §� D- a c k i 0 t k k \ 0. {7 I k + � ( § § 0 �\\\ \§§) \i�° {7 I k + � ( § § 0 \ § # § [ cc (L —=:zz:a--&--C= § § § 0 § k )` (>}§ !§m! �§§Kk \! §F.°� § § § 0 § k � w � y x p Lf)� 6 F ro z U � U w coG C d N N O Lo .0 a d k z N i U -j W` I LLJ �� X d o` I ` N a \� I 6 CL r LU uj uj U >roro 19 9 sa`tD-Or N Z N� O m C � � I N m W �mz cum m ro "o U n° Wm Qd� S z W ® rim0 04 ' Q 0. 6 N o a w \ a eAI 0v a (L Z N { 0 w oz w y Z oar° w N L N (.i X11 J w !L 7 N $ , lk § /. z } \\ ^ ;IE � E a§f§ z � § E2 0 � ------ 0 0. —�$--C-= k ( 2(!\ � ------ \ I \}\\ i. � I z § ----------- LU & 2(!\ \}\\ i. z § LU & W CL D z O Q LL g O w z Sollir,.; 1IL r4 w 4-1 I I J a rc i J w a a a a Y F w w N } 2 Z { o a U" LU D 114 - Wiz---= IL y� CL 0 cc a. �b �z ro0 0 p C G N E N Z 8-W mw m Z 0�o V A iG O DU= m ao� $U� m a z o a O cn F�� � c C K E o w az z� �z o.o�F t rU NNO ryJ. 0 o` 7 w z w wW Ir LU z 0 F- 0 0 F- 0 u 0 m � q _ q & \§! #g # | (\ £ •fir ,;§ ! / \ § FE ] \CL0 . , oe � \ \ \ §CL \§ ° 3 | k \ z 0 F- 0 0 F- 0 u 0 m � q ■ F- 6 § Ll q & #g $ _ � •fir ,;§ / \ r FE \CL0 . , oe ■ F- 6 § Ll a C F x ® a z I wz o w c W I ! crr $ zLCL V 0 w c ` 4j a °c c w b 6 Nd.0b E c l9 E N Z �O v V a L a dHb e £ N LL 1 ` H—Q O rj = O Io S t.1; 6 p w Z:)a 0 U a w Ube O m a J w ® �y u CL z ,a cod Q 1 ¢ W- i w w o f d Z tin A i K E a ° waz Z N Z O ❑ l� ° �° ° o '"'o U A p eww ^o \ ° o® ) N N O 0 vO•ma � O.. a e oc IR ca y mZ0 oeQ C C 0 d F Q E C LL. 8fa N �y7 cNZ 0 c00 r m U Z >, O ,r�Us m o Z OU0 C B O m o CL y R LU N (L w U � ro C � � 3°1 K e c O n a z wiz w 0 Z �O a o a 1 >L A v a PD w W a ca LLI J w < a I a z J a � a a n v s o � W W ; 1 O w z oe W r ¢ oc IR ca y mZ0 oeQ C C 0 d F Q E C LL. 8fa N �y7 cNZ 0 c00 r m U Z >, O ,r�Us m o Z OU0 C B O m o CL y R LU N (L w U � ro C � � 3°1 K e c O n a z wiz w 0 Z �O a o a 1 >L A v a PD w W a ca LLI � s •'i 1) K� J L < fy C Z ® (d � C 0 U §Fa F ti 2 r• d a 0 x ) Ya ° w v �" # LL i I z 0 C_ m A cc >n� .c, &Cq7 0. � 1 W r I a' W 1 � mwo� ° 0. t�- W ® 0 v ® y0 m I Ux d e >L+Q 0 W C fi` d30. I- < s ®0� 1 E� ° ra.OF c yz �o o ca icl Ica C Wz M U W W L � D T Q o °.e N Q W b zyTc () F Ct W 0-7 I I® o �Wv V �® m6� Oa Q Z 0 0Cro � c r 0 �o wiz 7y N Z W 4 C ¢ cc 0 WIG ", P4w 'c ( t2LL 1 z r. ro rng o F I l! CL Y Q w Q cl A w Z Q r w LU t- ff 0] w W w a w CC J � � I K � J h ry 6 LL J ' w Z Q r w LU t- ff 0] w W w a w CC W a m Q w EL a a uj z w LU Q � m mZ mo p c Q E a LL O g=z 8 �w w c m 6 O o m m U T 0 } ro o �j Z c OOro N U cao� w ro o m> a � �Lh a o� � U � v c N tF N Z o O rn Q CCF N 3 � � v o. zp wo w z z �,z 3ro80 o2�o P: w r t C V N NO EL y G S #3 O # c ¢ Q IL ,` S EE d N O a m�N IL a. c W 3°� a U 0 L W a m Q w EL a a uj z w LU Q � m mZ mo p c Q E a LL O g=z 8 �w w c m 6 O o m m U T 0 } ro o �j Z c OOro N U cao� w ro o m> a � �Lh a o� � U � v c N tF N Z o O rn Q CCF N 3 � � v o. zp wo w z z �,z 3ro80 o2�o P: w r t C V N NO EL y G � \ } � in ! § \ } CD Eli' z 0 0 C3 W 7 --7_z—= J Z p W J � S K H J w w aW ( I J I ! z M w CCw I- Q W K_ W ® Z a VOl e 2 m d D 25 z u g dLL Oa. ro V 2 I '� d IL m� W EC Z ; z00 0- N b O \ W V t OUE U ®i \� In g L r®. O h d � v= N z mo O m Q C � N W Erol a vi ,m.W O N O w , 0 2 � U cc Oo Po y > o �mm o w a ® a or > E. ® U m Z O 1] e LU bL -- b4 Q ' • C Q 11 a d K E o w �z z N z o e of w y cc N Y O rn ? CL p I lk n wI z w CC w Q a G N Z m0 o dc) < a Emz 8�a w 0mz 0 SCO w m o W Z c 0N� a J rn> an W d Q. O y U R Z 0.0 Orn C � C Ooo w �z m �o OP W w�NV cc N r >wp o CL4 a �Nb� p z a O w c a m mw O LL T-2 a ct -i:3 m ® a ya qa� CL \Ii S ct 09 n wI z w CC w Q a G N Z m0 o dc) < a Emz 8�a w 0mz 0 SCO w m o W Z c 0N� a J rn> an W d Q. O y U R Z 0.0 Orn C � C Ooo w �z m �o OP W w�NV cc N r >wp o CL4 a �Nb� p 9 \ § » § [ ) o\}\& � § § &/ (/ 2i§ ))0 I {g } N S m zz F Q R R Q Z w z tai. u 5 a m s a c� ® _ (Di i o w o W I s z WC LU 0 C O Q 3®`D tL O jim v 0 w Q C O 6 ro�Oh -F w� N z 0 p C m m � � O �y uMoc�D - m W 00 — 'Q-) 0 } CUA° m Q q W Z c w N loo � m W Q N co uj CL (o� ®, C m G Q t9 iS� Z w w `� N m ° I ° ®cc v a kf - EL E o c a Z oz go Oa F. W of oo mrocQU N N O IL � I a1°irn=m � CL 0' J \tl T" CL a. Ev � m N z m0 1. p Q < G 0 mr p O � ? °«1 w O UCp i �I U .n ro o zp w w lJ w ate° > U J w �w a m y m '- Y U ani 'cmc O p $ m N 0 ; R ?A E o w gz N Z 0 a� mrn�� F'I rL N b aS J I W � u W J WY "s a n a a •F 4i N ? Z 2 W Z lJ t] W i { I ui cc H w w U Ev � m N z m0 1. p Q < G 0 mr p O � ? °«1 w O UCp i �I U .n ro o zp w w lJ w ate° > U J w �w a m y m '- Y U ani 'cmc O p $ m N 0 ; R ?A E o w gz N Z 0 a� mrn�� F'I rL N b aS � 6 r" yy J z O s a a ❑ ~ w z n Z S W I' I w Lu W Q e p BOJ w IL \ CL F 7a Qh \ Oc a \ z o P. a c m E LL MZ LULU �z ® oG0 -iso z�� a W � a � Ute•`€ W ®1 IL v m E Z oa �r cccc ®" a z a KE o e ° >w g z > oo ij °o.i oI 11 N O O of W i N U ric w w O rL L- S m p C� k ,I \ ( § \ § ( ■ � � ) ` \ §(\/ \%§§ 2}/m& §. ul � § � � a f vi K W L J pry W P Q W cc9 b A a rotes �. 1 i o ID a f LUa s S In p ;t y Q� a0.CL NZ �c0 p C Q N � � e E c � G O t DA; QUa � 16o G .000 W 4 Z ® U mW o jL 0 a > m a v N a EL �LLI �I .1�7_--.__.._.___ `1J _ s 0. �. r I LL Q < W Cc O 0 i a :2 o ' L m Z d p d v w 0 v� a _ a a E O H i y m U ® e ZLU ami cj CL LU z >"�� d IR a w O ® y0,; ai cc s�❑c �0 'LLI A.OF o c �r roTroZ V C) D G Q Lu N � � U Lu N Z G V m Q m o W cc LU ¢a o EmOM, 6 �4 Z. q =U o�I I a d G 0 rn m o - d ~ "v y ® 0- occ In.o n- Z > W a Z z N z G �; 0 80 OA � cCaJ li M CL m rn.Z IL F w p x x �■ �)\ z j\)) \ k§ # 2 CL \,., E \�\ ( --- & ~ ~� LU /I! nom 6 § ° R \||\ )f J) § § I LU )|]) k / cc « !_ 0 ®!(+ j is §/a9 E� oz .() . $§ �\)_ .. E o� -- )\\ \ , /7/ §\ ,R LU ' I . k/) e * �!@ < 9!z \ \ E 0 B ' 2\e )° E LU $®§§ . o)y@ 2 !7a m f§{ CL {§ b\ , _ )$!o ( . ;>a o J � � y w J NY Y Q W 0. U) YWY,C w W Q C ` LL -01oIL Ij Z-j l CC \ cc c `a d o W \ Na V m ,t D. ®h Q o e yz co b b � N � � Ep r� N z u W � m 0 gz� U � °I p U o W So a a N ro Q ao c m Z oA uj �j O m 0Q l N a l O ® / IL � N Z � o 0 EE w anz °® mL 0 [ - _ --- 4 N 0 Z � h ajv� p i I I I I ( �nn xLv I I I Z Zia P' < W P I O yyp� w i Q. ,e Ir W m'e'-1b � r L EL cc (CC %CL^� B U p m U m MA.®f- N N z >v O 0 am� w daLL� p �a 8 m z m Ov Om- 2—o 46 p z Z c U U o W 4 N U roc m J W awy V a o m ~ ® m I 1 m r U d � IL romc ui N ° I ° 0 A a z LU 'Uj Z o O F W s-6 rU cc >' CL W Wy mrn=m r�vr i I I I I ( �nn xLv I I I ; $ CL R \||( � m |f{\ \ | \ (k41 ` ) {k m (\ $ § . w}/ {\{ ` E)z - a �� - ®�( _ \\0 \)\ � )\0 § oA k g- - r, \ \ o 2 \°./\ a.\\ =oa } F- I §\\ )\\ ƒ / § I ora E° %A[ z §I) _0]) 2 z 0 � 0 0 LU/ o� 0 « a. § \ 1 � § § —==Zj—x--<= ■ � yz d ` �i ; d 3 � § § —==Zj—x--<= ■ Ir�eto ' ) § � Q CM (L m 0 (L PIE k \ } § [ ) (\2( (f. § @ \ e z ® z a g N U g w t 10, b2 tS z G' LL c ° E W ! z CL md;Ce O IIL pp-- ?� Q U) W O r ® v 0 3 m e G cc W 4 m # c O 6 O N G N Z m0 `ro- ocQ d � Ecu.. � W 0 Q U n 'd 46 0l O W I z�= 0 w V Q O m LU ® O.a rn > F Lu nn.. 0 h` g z o a d' 3 I = °r 0 O cc a zm W E o Wiz Vz O 8 Oa N y O -' --- o on.l -i > o�rn=y ! 7 \ 1 IL Lr E / ( \ , § § § ( c ■ L— \ LU ( / ► j \ q C14 o o k §! $ k�& CL f 7\I �kIL M o W| `°®! �i({ k � � "§! ■ L— \ LU ( / ► j \ \ $ k�& �kIL +LO \ o `°®! �i({ qM0 ■ L— \ LU ( / ► j 2 0 / Q 0 u § 0 m a. ! ■ \ § ) � § / \ LU N § ( 0 \) �` !}\§ §!§§ §\��\ � § / \ LU N § ( 0 f 0 \ 0 u e S 0 _ a. \ § k Ll I ) ¥ k\|\ q>§§ §#&§ \t. $ [ LU § k \ § !( |) m = | § CK) 4 G | (# ' ¥§\\ ƒ !!mm k \`. k \ § k k ( ¥§\\ !!mm �§/7( �§ _ \ k k ( ! § « ( \ [ crCL I � � I � g . � I I I------- § § � E 0 r- �)\ \ LL 0M )\, � s\/ � 1 o \/\\ � § \/> § }15 \\/ 0a LL. ))Z 4°$3 / °\,< cc 013 �k \) W -;_/ & ! $ § m } ( k k\}/ !>!m )4\) §�: ;0] )�'.. k 2 k \ } � § ) i k\§\ \\22` §}{\` \i. 6 2. ( LIJ� N f� CL D CL 019 z _O F. U t�- CJ LL1 13 CC !I W m W w a J w w t J � Q � J nywry l'l w 0 0 ® w w z u u W w W ccw h n !I W m W w a 2 , § | § \ \ » —==:Z:�—_--- C=::i I d ! §(�) \\}/ r§() o�l0 ww I d Z t- W n cr d Q A r w a O rr CL �M� x Ix Q Ix S ' i 7 `) x lx I Ix a VJ cc w >� d a dq m v 0 e d04.; N O oda a ouC Q A r w a O rr CL �M� x Ix Ix ' i x lx I Ix _rte LO Cl) CL CL —�Z---Q W EzE 0 Y K d N Z m0 L � H m m a U � C� LL . o cmz p°p O 13 O Cao N 3g m 0 p IX O U W Iq� F^ Tod 0 C W 0210 J m > Q ® 0 mN 6 a m ® "a g ca > LL e m z m o 'A U- rn i6 r d P N •� N O c o � ?_ a O � E o F �p O ,z 0 o� o>= w N� N o d O O t m a a —�Z---Q W EzE 0 N Z m0 L � H m m a U � C� LL EsZ cmz O 13 O Cao } 1}111,p} m QU 0 W Iq� W 0210 J m > —�Z---Q W EzE 0 N Z m0 L � H m m a U � C� LL EsZ cmz O 13 O Cao } cUA ¢5 m QU 0 W W 0210 J m > Q. �w mN L a m $ U ani ca z m o 'A U- rn i6 r d P N •� N O c o � ?_ a K E o w ,z 0 o� o>= w N� N o d O O t m a a LL Nbw [� , r 1 i c J rfy� p W v J � y d n C O I- o u Cz a 0 to z p U ® z u R f z �C c wcc I c g S d D ¢ W Z CLe w WLU 2 z CL w¢ a a p o04;u i W CL I� o 0 v NG. 0 D i oa - yz m0 L a F o � Q e � mwO EDW _ y m U L fL N W g� a 8b Z o S O �� oSa�- I > Ic QUa Ic z oy} o CC a n IL y ro a o08 I grygry I Q � N LL a C °o old �� a� O �y N p "' o CLa � LL Q — d O �f W z O W U y�° .Ill . _Coa � n , r 1 G Lr K 1 y f e 6 Fm ®i T a / Q. d N �I" z / W CD a K c o i I w a cm a d a w z c w a m a M w c m aE .. In N a 4 � O ❑ a G C ° 8 m I a E�z o c az m u��1 Q O. LU i m m p lU w LL a zB00 ai=o w �z e a°a,3o �U W $s y N O F- mw��m � a C 6[ N F i w ? d 4 W_ U Q aN1 N z z y It W d Q W fr > N C Z cc Z �; Q mFF N m �G C 30f° ❑ N W e fagg O m 0 ,�; w [C U 4 O IWgL" y O 9o7 r10M C k N Nz 'n f= omd N G Ok w MZ e pec I C� ®a 0.0 IL n.mm 0 v z22 u cc W iN cc a. o a�E W aZ z 2i 0 W 4C yQ) Oc m m § w § k \ ƒ . $| \ \ \ \ . -- ) } \ � >!� §\§/ §i CL LU LOU | z .,°» . 0 § lk�; _ | kf\{� f ,■ /£0A !§ )£ § w § k \ -j--z--- = ¢ El x� K Z J rz O 4 £ 2 WA �0�j I1J L7 � � u O V -j--z--- = ¢ El K Z J 4 £ 2 WA �0�j A L7 � � u y❑ i z E 6 W � § 0 _ / „ $ | „ ; \ ) \ � oLL ( a \��2 ko \ z 7R § / \! \& \L CL CL ® ., � § 0 _ co cc Q. � m O O m e ® W ! s ff N d Q IL Z Q? cm V d ®Pa LU Q U a. a d NdOF- � yZ N � O C ID W C LL M �mZ C OS� i l_ b e 4 5 ° IE ® U J 17.1 g Q'� a.mro a o 4 gym= s . O ® j O o d a i Z m I ITT �E o Z D -- rroc4CC N e j G0 0 D- �i ro rn > a rL di v a i g Z Qj y � z a d 4 4 o a y El K �F�• d R >LL Q ff(( K ❑ W 2 u u y I ro- am W m z O n CL w U B F`m 3 S2 tD ❑ O' O ® v ov cCL to M U a c CL v Hd OF� o c ❑ v= ro z o O o � c � C 4 m ro p w m zz� O 0 W U N U v > paw'' c wj J N FL Lu N V Q ® 0 N M U w a �O n U N U W ® L' _-- R 3 e e EL cr LL CL � W A Z Zy y z i O� $O pW 1 m 6 C Q a5 ��UU CC EL ❑ LO (L � 0 I 2 � A :E ( / I &--= W. \\ \�\\ 0 a + f § § W. ., w O rc EL -z------------- J � N C Y J S O u a a a x 7 z z % W K C © W Z l7 L7 f 1 � i o w x w a n cu N � NO a `m C Gm mho ERmr Z N w mmZ t3 m Oxy > Y U .n ca m o z�= 5 0U0 N U 'OO J 0 a �� 2 0 12 U E � m c zea oma Q � N c O'� m LL a E o W a Z �Nmz 0,.29 w m�@¢ �s NU N IL m m F N a b O i �I �I I� ____.__—___ J � N C Y J S O u a a a x 7 z z % W K C © W Z l7 L7 f 1 � i o w x w a n cu N � NO a `m C Gm mho ERmr Z N w mmZ t3 m Oxy > Y U .n ca m o z�= 5 0U0 N U 'OO J 0 a �� 2 0 12 U E � m c zea oma Q � N c O'� m LL a E o W a Z �Nmz 0,.29 w m�@¢ �s NU N IL m m F N a b O z O B U F- LY ) mLY) ct �ld° M Q W O Q A \ C I I I I I o I I I E� T z O v 0 5vo @ O ��Z N a LU c m�0 0 �cO m o 2 � c bUa a 'S wV� "0 me Z.2 °n _O m ~Ei � 0 O c c 0 Z� E o W 7Z Z w Z �r O ,W, 5 -5 S 0 N 0. W 'o .'S- W W m a W W w 0 I a e m� rc pgg � w I N O a # W _ CCL �, ra d o N 0 c�� o ; rL ; ( w l z M ¢mr o cc t� y a c H 3 L. i F w a � Q ro 0 5 j " �0 I w s°8a 6 y sv k^ D. O4z 1 O C $ cu w Z m0 0 oma¢ F w N w CO Z 0cO -_—_--_ - v oT :FO;} ,QUA m N o 0 cr LU U ti c W J rn>m EM®I o O « c Z o n U w } F ❑Q Op@ a ¢ - - N ¢ •3 m ® a v 0c & o ❑ LL a j z� W-QZ Z N :e Z 080 o rj o p O O C- ;t5 Z: ro m> FLy LO I � G � 2. \!li!z : . 11 # } � Ll CC ( 0 - C p J yk+ Z q N C Z- Lo CL g ¢oo e 0� CLp IL Lv 2 e 1630 n o p � 0 arr �U e0 o Ww 8 m MOIL or NZ w L -0h O C L_ - z � 2 W � _ z m e U A m o W 000 6 ® I 4 U ani fl e m c Z o a Ll1 r F�� a 3 N 1 Y O Q U O a L �- � par 00 a n a z I _d ficy0 w O� O `.��' N 35 a FL N n - 2 _ (L \ \ | 2 § k # \ ( ;j{§ 0. } \|\7 } § o4@ k�({ 7!!7 � ( uj Q. m CL �X---C= M k\|§ )\))� \g/\,= i.° z § j ! | § [ ( } � , # . � o f \ � �)) \ K k§\? � X0;j\ o 0k/ � §£a» § [ ( co LO CL a ± I Ll � § ) I � ., 2 I` � � I I I { I � � I I I )! I � �I . / ( \ ( k w B § d ., 2 I` � � I I I I - )! k\\\ , m (\§( Lul » � / ( \ ( k w B § d ., 2 I` � � I I I I - / ( \ ( k w B § d y§ it H A { K LO yy�y LL ? ® I WL O ztm �✓ V z0 O W ® G cc N y r C L Mo j h C - j mca Ot— O C 3� z c�K OE 'F O --, �z U V LU o � � p v 1 e� O U W dr n° 000 o lu Oho EC W 6 >W I z O W O Q C N ® LU Qo ~ �: m $ O q O as 's f- w z ° °c U w N q>4 pv OY d N 'p LO I � / Ell § \ \ � § ) —=:2—z --C= I� . )§ \ / §4\` §�' z § _ ( 0 —=:2—z --C= -- �-----�.! . / co LO a CL "l13h z Q O L>A Q w o. a D. —Z --c3 I I I I I I 1 I I { 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I C �I —Z --c3 E n7 z as off¢ 'D o�z U Li �W roz o v c O m 07 m o w z 00 cc w Qw � J m> o CL �L� CL o m '- +�-� U ani n N G Z O L3 O m P C L c c O:a o. zea z z � z 3 ° o o��l= w IL w y�UO W C y 4 O Q i IL �I J W Q F >U q q J W a 6 F A z Q w z u u ' W i O JI cr w F - Q E n7 z as off¢ 'D o�z U Li �W roz o v c O m 07 m o w z 00 cc w Qw � J m> o CL �L� CL o m '- +�-� U ani n N G Z O L3 O m P C L c c O:a o. zea z z � z 3 ° o o��l= w IL w y�UO W C y 4 O Q i IL h CL d e %. a CC w d. Q d �co Z ro0 �F v aC cot:LLO Eda a w oro 620 o U 0n W 4 aN _j 0 m W O rn> a � � CL 0 w U � v a, r Z Ba 0 m� OLLC �aZo z � z o:2 Z U W N �O r� yw gid( tm > mrn�m ° 0'aa'� Y � z w � � a a a a a w w Lu w w q �co Z ro0 �F v aC cot:LLO Eda a w oro 620 o U 0n W 4 aN _j 0 m W O rn> a � � CL 0 w U � v a, r Z Ba 0 m� OLLC �aZo z � z o:2 Z U W N �O r� yw gid( tm > mrn�m ° 0'aa'� I� \}}( §�'� /i.°1 ( § \ {fin T o Lam- 4pd J � 0 P Ip O F 6. O N K 4 z z a wd� 2 T' I z p ® 'T O « m fE e�*;0 ti c m C y Z d�F O � C 12 0 8 ° W C N 0 LLI �Ua W F y > U Co 0 O W ® 1 rn> CL u I W (J CL gy m ml CL I cmc w �ry E7b la LU ® F 4 90 F E L y W CEol � S y C O CL a ] © q Z N W ,o Z p o �v80 Q W IL CL N V | 0 � 0 0 / S 0 _ CL \ ( § La z O I-- C) w i cc IL a I I I 2 k § § _- —---- I � I � ! I § � I � m@�§ I � . b I � ! § � m@�§ §(\( �� 1:!© 6 / LU \ c �. r II i I 1 I j � gs i I w rc � n n - (0 CL LU 5 ��®oY I LU z L O 435 Vm ® C1 a; 0. I 0. e oya& ' ® O u ® Cl) 0. ®F 1 EO 4 I Z o0 vF O r Yt ami L W QI I mw �mz �I a — t I. I .4 .. w ❑ 05 0 Q N uj w J �Wa m 2 L FL CL C L }F z o a Orn ro w _ G ® �7 LC w Qpm N a Q O0 a IL4 cc LL z� J W En z 0 F w m� CQ Is r i I 1 I j i I 1g I I O w 0.0 9 %0 W � z O z I I 0 0 � I fd LL I I k 0 �+ d e6E'UJI Ud J 1 w x w a33I I w C y CL m r 0` V MQ 0E- o c I w N 9i z 0 O � Q C 0 C U. U LU LU C N I P 6 m o I, °I Z c 0 010 W a'•J J �7 a. r m n,14 I 4"}` � 0. 0 d � e I a I � 4 I G?� c�a£•m a z o w 13 Fb� ® ; 0d ° CC CL 00 w cs p °tea _ a --- I z I f Jaz oma• °gym°c4 g cc i y N 0 W L_J C w N � z Q w � w w M E M nrc rc d w w w Z w w w o I � � { § � ! 21 � ( ) -==Zz:a--&--C= I , / \ § � ± ) k 7` J m $ v 7 Z �q C O p 6 E12 a ° W 0 A2 0 LL Lu is >+ d cc LU M a. U y ° ro o W Y o o ° ° ❑ ya0 E m NZ m O v vwp L E N LU 15 � � U n 4 {T�N� cc a Uo Z o ® -4 g' > o I a > m CL Q m ani cc Q a N cc I d I Z = w E o a I Z z m z e i pa S op _ y y Q cc uj > O O a D. (� b Z ❑ a C Z1 z 0 ®I b LiJ i cc cl 4 H w 0. d J W Q � W ? p Y 2 u a a a u i Z q LSI W H � g ® w z u u WI j w I z J CL crcr LJ1 Ea y � N 6 o G e( v IY Eau- Es4 8 f w W -Nz o � �c0 C m w .I S S 0 in m o Ua w `o`�'�� � (L 7) a 012 "am c rora,� z o a O rn LL� c c O a o 959 �2 wiz° Z y z o.o w �w 0"O �,-4 > off, a 03 >d �I �- NY7w I I I I I I I I 1 I I I i i I ry I i I I , I I i I I I I I I i I I I I I I , I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I -CIL J W Q � W ? p Y 2 u a a a u i Z q LSI W H � g ® w z u u WI j w I z J CL crcr LJ1 Ea y � N 6 o G e( v IY Eau- Es4 8 f w W -Nz o � �c0 C m w .I S S 0 in m o Ua w `o`�'�� � (L 7) a 012 "am c rora,� z o a O rn LL� c c O a o 959 �2 wiz° Z y z o.o w �w 0"O �,-4 > off, a 03 >d �I �- NY7w z 0 F- 0 0 u F- 0 cc a_ Z \ § \ § ZZZ2--a—,c= 0 0 I� )\)) !)a; kava w Ww o § § � . § ;{, \ § § /\ $/ 0 0 )j \ _ \\{ 0 C) § S \p § \) � \\\ /\°§ U Z. aelu ® z 2e ®°a0/ )\ \, f®2g ESQ/in I I} I. I I I � � . I I I - � /\ $/ 0 0 )j \ _ \\{ 0 C) § S \p § \) � \\\ /\°§ U Z. aelu ® z 2e ®°a0/ )\ \, f®2g ESQ/in I) !|:)§ �2;E§ to § )� +, k /\ $/ 0 0 )j \ _ \\{ 0 C) § S \p § \) � \\\ /\°§ U Z. aelu ® z 2e ®°a0/ )\ \, f®2g ESQ/in EL a. 9 z P- 4 C, cc CL it 2 I - w a O 0. Y� - - 0 --- E �a .k m N Z m0 e�F- O G Q Of m 0 C U. O w!0 Z U L UJ [U O o E3 O _ m �3 ` m $ W 0U0 CC Lu Q O m W _t re > C- y m �U $ d s Z O A O �m ~ � N � o Z.4 y Wo Z 3:aN � O OP W N N UO W o d>.2 mNZ'a. �aaj �I ®-Ngo g �I W Q = I z � u } y a � a a p W 41 w z u u a Z W I O z U W m tu Q E �a .k m N Z m0 e�F- O G Q Of m 0 C U. O w!0 Z U L UJ [U O o E3 O _ m �3 ` m $ W 0U0 CC Lu Q O m W _t re > C- y m �U $ d s Z O A O �m ~ � N � o Z.4 y Wo Z 3:aN � O OP W N N UO W o d>.2 mNZ'a. �aaj �I ®-Ngo g ci \}§\ \ ) N � z \§ ° UJI \ � � } k I z \jkLa R f f° w o =oma! _ $ \ \\\ !§ Jz 7§ . )\ Ll - \\z \\\ ° EO lgw § yy\ ` )\) § 0 0 CL . ago K 222 ° /\\ \ } I 2 /\( �v"'� � \--- ))� y¥2. - )^ I °®`�� /tP ° m -- I Zg;0 § #§/S ! z 0 Q < 0 0 / 0 0 m CL ) \ $ (�. \�\\ ea=a § � § @ /� ID n W c LLJW a w W U L 4 1 s J _ ({ z � z Q 3 a o a U Q d p V v Lcww9j a LL. W u �"+. tm ccX y h � z da"1 L q 3 ® = Q q. q 0 \ c U a ��, `8 IL m D 0 F- ID n W c LLJW a w W s 4 1 s ID n W c LLJW a w W � LU k j § # MI � I � I I , Ir I I ® y�z C - --v,-- Z% a--= T-1 \ § 0 CL f � § 0 ± B ! E MF _ I � !\ MF —=z::2—a--= / § / io § k ) / / | . WX/| § !/ § , 7 § oIm & | 2G{; ; b § 0 41 §, §f \ƒ ) |!//0 §_ ,§ a% —=z::2—a--= / § / io § k ) / / CL � [ m CL \ k / § § Q § § I k • § $'k I )5w, ■ Q s m C a.a § W,» to K \ \§);CLI ƒ ] ;f§§ /\/} | ' E, f) CL � [ m CL \ k / § § Q § § I z 0 F- 0 0 u F- 0 W 0 I I �� \ } 0 E/ \/) k%/ ®f \ 2 /{) m LU C0 $@f ® (\\ 0 , §\\ )\/ LL ) z u=R o j \ 0 !»®\ * ° ##25 /] }IL , }0 k M� § !/ \ } f{} \ ) . g}(\\ a �,, /'a» \5 u '°� | § . «^ � 0 .� § / 0 & #®0 ///} z 0 F- 0 0 u F- 0 W 0 I I �� \ } 0 E/ \/) k%/ ®f \ \�k /{) m LU C0 $@f ® (\\ 0 , §\\ )\/ LL ) z u=R o j \ 0 !»®\ * ° ##25 /] }IL , }0 k M� z 0 p j 0 / Q u 0 _ rL k ( ( \ . i \\!� )� z I �§ R %|■ IL J /i°. .& J | E §§ § § Z�jCL \JCL �; \0 . 0 z 0 p j 0 / Q u 0 _ rL k ( ( / ( } § ) k § . i / ( } § ) k § § CE / 2 j 0 k j K §i � - 300 . it \f\ & , \ C . § R \ §§ \���� � 2 | b ! § 043 . §; . \ §{k{ _ /!G« lL0 E, |; w /® § CE / 2 j 0 k j \ ) ) ccE w § § m / !� | k k ( LU m; i �� LUr | k4j EL \ ) ) ccE w § § m / !� 2 0 � 0 0 / Q k 0 cc rL k k } § § § §I ■ § \ f CL $ o ,; � §f�{. /// Ll §` w t) 2 0 � 0 0 / Q k 0 cc rL k k } § § § §I ■ § 2 0 � 0 0 u @ 0 q J _ a ) [ § » ■ § § > § § a� \� k E N . �\ ( k \ | § }§\ IL Z \! \ ) ,• Z £ ; �� 'a" Z / 22{{ ` / CL CL w ./ 2 0 � 0 0 u @ 0 q J _ a ) [ § » ■ § § > § § a� \� N § _ & �a—= ±a / } / EI\|;LL Ef \ \\0 /{) § .9 § 0 \\\ � \\} ` \\\ k/\ /\) ®Aƒ ))z.. »°§6 0 A ƒ±42 $ »®22. \/ /} r / 0\] 5 | . .. ® 7( l 4\y/ )§ z . o(! R ! f \ 2}, \/ � } } \ . \ . , \ a & 2 §rz ), . CL 5 ;! aWL `a. E_ !§ .. e/ �a—= ±a / } / EI\|;LL Ef \ \\0 /{) § .9 § 0 \\\ � \\} ` \\\ k/\ /\) ®Aƒ ))z.. »°§6 0 A ƒ±42 $ »®22. \/ /} r / 0\] 5 2 0 w j 0 / 0 LY 0 I 0- k w r / \ i Fil | \ k » —zz-�J—%--c�--( # § \ } � ) (00) \�j/ � 6 ƒ{ J/a/ | \ k » —zz-�J—%--c�--( / § § I »I § �)\)\ (Lu iI / § § I »I § ! f t a ---c= � \ \ § )� k� j \ /«}! .a � \ \ § )� k� j a d Fw� u zl, W 1 ' d / � P \ M. a =:Z�x--= \§gym !\ �)&\) /i�°� } � , Q \ � -�� i \§ cl ujq�� $ CL � � (L }\ ) ) / 1.1 f , , I \ \ ¥ 7 § ■ 0 % \ � i� � E �M� a § . ! § CC) § z DL �� 2 | k 00 "L /0 �M� PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY APPENDIX POTABLE WATER SYSTEM Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 2 NO. OF TAB DESCRIPTION PAGES Wl CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 1 W2 PROJECTS W-01 THRU W-05 9 DATA SHEETS AND COST ESTIMATES W3 WATER SYSTEM ASSETS 4 INVENTORY AND CONDITION W4 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 311 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB WI CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 1 Page Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY m CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY AND PRIORITY RANK Proiect Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 Project Priority Year 1 Years 2-5 Ranking W-01 Existing WTP: Upgrade; add 2 new wells and injection well $4,280,000 45 W-02 Water Booster Pump Station: Immediate repairs; Replace entire station $100,000 $1,930,000 39 W-03 Overall SCADA for monitoring potable water system $1,850,000 44 W-04 Everglades City: Upgrade existing water lines for adequate fire flows $500,000 $2,250,000 48 W-05 Everglades City: Replace asbestos cement water lines $140,000 35 TOTALS $600,000 $10,450,000 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM $11,050,000 NOTES: 1 The cost estimates are conceptual. 2 CIP does not include upgrades necessary for entire Everglades City utility system to fully comply with Collier County Utilities Standards. New construction will comply with the County Standards. 3 Upgrade of water piping for fire flows will require hydraulic analysis to determine actual pipe quantities. 4 The costs for the DIWs at the WRF and WTP are based on shallow injection wells. If normal deep injection wells are required, the cost for each facility will increase by $7M. 5 Cost estimates exclude annual maintenance and renewal costs. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W2 Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT DATA SHEETS & COST ESTIMATES PROJECTS W-01 THRU W-05 9 Pages Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 Description: 1. Install 2 new shallow wells, pumps and standby generator and raw water main to WTP. 2. Replace membranes in existing two membrane treatment skids. 3. Replace existing chemical feed pumps. 4. Upgrade or replace existing standby generator and fuel storage tank with sufficient capacity to power WTP. 5. Upgrade electrical system and install new SCADA system. 6. Replace two transfer pumps and the pump cans located under the building slab. 7. Replace valves at pumps and in yard piping that were installed in 1970s. B. Install injection well for disposal of membrane concentrate. 9. Repairs to Ground Storage Tank and leaking pumps and piping. Justification & (1) Refer to Drinking Water System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. Documentation: dated March 2019. Tab W3 (2) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. Tab W4 -A (3) FL DEP Inspection Report of February 17, 2017. Tab W4 -G (4) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County and the County's response of March 20, 2017. Tab W4 -F (5) Hole Montes reports of May 2017 covering emergency repairs to the WTP and the Water Booster Pump Station. Tab W4 -C (6) Hole Montes Risk Assessment report of April 4, 2016. Tab W4-1 (7) FL Rural Water Association email of January 20, 2017 to Hole Montes regarding conditions at the WTP. Tab W4 -H (8) FL Rural Water Association report dated April 25, 2017. Tab W4 -E Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Rankine Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 4 8 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Ranking 45 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $4,280,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-01 Water Treatment Plant Upgrades Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Cost Membrane replacement in existing skids 2 ea $90,000 $180,000 New shallow wells w/elec & standby generator' 2 ea $140,000 $280,000 Standby generator & ATS for existing wells 1 ea $100,000 $100,000 New raw water mains to WTP - Allowance 2,000 If $55 $110,000 New injection well' 1 ea $800,000 $800,000 Piping and valves to injection well' 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 New standby generator, ATS and fuel tank 1 ea $275,000 $275,000 Replace chemical feed pumps and controls 8 ea $15,000 $120,000 Replace transfer pumps and pump cans 2 ea $80,000 $160,000 Allowance: Valve replacements 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 Allowance: Replace/upgrade yard piping 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 New SCADA system 1 Is $150,000 $150,000 Upgrade elec system 1 Is $350,000 $350,000 Repairs and coatings for 0.5 MG GST 1 Is $75,000 $75,000 Miscellaneous building upgrades 1 Is $50,000 $50,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $2,950,000 ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST ' Excludes any required property and easement cost 20% Engineering and CEI Services $590,000 25% Contingency $737,500 TOTAL (rounded up) $4,280,000 T:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-01 Water Treatment Plant Cost Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Replace aging masonry, wood roof truss building to accommodate the new piping, mechanical equipment and electrical & control systems. Equipment in building to be sized to provide adequate fire flow and increased water demand. 2. Replacement of two jockey pumps, two recirculation pumps, two 30 hp high -service pumps as well as flow meters, pressure sensors, piping and valves. The recently installed VFDs for the two high -service pumps will be reused. 3. Install new above ground piping and valves in pump room. 4. Install new yard piping and tie-ins with existing water mains. 5. Replace standby generator, fuel tank and ATS. 6. Install new electrical system and new flowmeters & SCADA system. 7. Repairs and painting of Ground Storage Tank. Justification & (1) Booster pump station building and most equipment, piping and ground storage tank are Documentation: over 40 years old. The condition of the building and the piping and most equipment reflect a long term lack of maintenance and routine replacement. (2) Refer to Drinking Water System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. dated June, 2019. Tab W3 (3) FL DEP Consent Order of July 6, 2018. TabW4-A (4) FL DEP Inspection Report of February 17, 2017. Tab W4 -G (5) FL DEP letter of March 3, 2017 to Collier County and the County's response of March 20, 2017. Tab W4 -F (6) Hole Montes reports of May 2017 covering emergency repairs to the WTP and the Water Booster Pump Station. Tab W4 -C (7) Hole Montes Risk Assessment report of April 4, 2016. Tab W4-1 (8) FL Rural Water Association email of January 20, 2017 to Hole Montes regarding conditions at the WTP. Tab W4 -H (9) FL Rural Water Association report dated April 25, 2017. Tab W4 -E Project Category Ranking Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Rank Ranking Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 3 15 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 3 9 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 5 10 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Ranking 39 (Rank & Priority Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $1,930,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Pro)ect Data Sheets & Cast Est\W-02 Booster Pump Station Upgrades.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Item New building (30 ft by 30 ft) to house equipment and electrical & control systems' New 30 hp high service pumps New jockey pumps and recirculation pumps New piping inside pump building New yard piping, valves and tie-ins to existing piping Replace standby generator, fuel tank and ATS. New electrical, control and SCADA systems Repairs and coatings for 0.5 MG Ground Storage Tank ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST lExcludes any required property cost Cost iantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) 900 sf $400 $360,000 2 ea $40,000 $80,000 4 ea $15,000 $60,000 1 ea $225,000 $225,000 1 Is $100,000 $100,000 1 Is $275,000 $275,000 1 Is $150,000 $150,000 1 Is $75,000 $75,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,325,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $265,000 25% Contingency $331,300 TOTAL (rounded up) $1,930,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memo,\G2 Design Submittal -Tech MemosReport\Mter-Project Data Sheets & Cort Est\W-02 Booster Pump Station Cost Est Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Install fiber optic cable for transmission of multiple remote SCADA signals to/from the Water Treatment Plant, the Water Booster Pump Station and water main pressure sensors. Signals for Supervisory, Control And Data Acquisition include pumps on/off operation, pumps speed control, various system pressures, tank levels, chemical pump operation, chemical levels, etc. SCADA signals will allow tracking of equipment run/down time as well as maintenance planning and optimization of power consumption. Fiber optic cable service will provide signals to and from devices and equipment installed over a distance covering more than 10 miles. 2. Install new pressure, level and flow sensors as well as pump and flow control devices and variable frequency devices. 3. Connect new SCADA system to Collier County Utility operations center. 4. Develop programming for SCADA system and commence functional monitoring and control of the water system on a continuous basis. Justification & (1) Refer to Drinking Water System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. Documentation: dated March, 2019. Tab W3 (2) FL DEP inspection reports and 2018 DEP, Consent Order. Tabs W4 -G and W4 -A Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 4 20 Operational Safety Risks: 4 2 8 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 3 9 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 3 6 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 44 (Rank & Rating: 1= lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $1,850,000 Cost is based on $1,000 per service connection and existing 1,629 service connections plus 215 new connections. H:\3019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Protect Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-03 Water SCADA SYstem.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Replace approximately 27,400 feet of existing 1 -inch to 4 -inch water main with new 6 inch water main to provide adequate fire flow. 2. Install approximately 65 new fire hydrants on the new water mains. Justification & (1) Refer to Drinking Water System - Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. Documentation: dated March, 2019. Tab W3 (2) FL DEP inspection reports and 2018 DEP Consent Order. Tabs W4 -G and W4 -A (3) FL Rural Water Association report dated April 25, 2017. Tab W4 -E H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-04 Water Main Upgrades E.C.Asx Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 5 25 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 3 6 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 48 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $2,750,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-04 Water Main Upgrades E.C.Asx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION Cost Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) Remove existing 1 to 4 -inch under sized water mains 27,400 sf $10 $274,000 Install new 6 -inch water mains 27,400 ea $45 $1,233,000 Install new fire hydrants 65 ea $5,000 $325,000 Install new 6 -inch valves 40 ea $1,500 $60,000 ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,892,000 20% Engineering and CEI Services $378,400 25% Contingency $473,000 TOTAL (rounded up) $2,750,000 H:\2939\2019007\EN\G Design-Rap.M-Toch Memos\62 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-04 Water Main Upgrades Cost Est.xlsx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Hole Montes, Inc. Collier County PROJECT DATA SHEET June 2019 UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Description: 1. Remove approximately 1,100 feet of existing asbestos cement water main 2. Install approximately 1,100 feet of 6 -inch water main 3. Install three gate valves 4. Install three new fire hydrants. Justification & (1) Refer to Drinking Water System -Asset Inventory and Condition by Hole Montes, Inc. Documentation: dated March, 2019. Tab W3 (2) FL DEP inspection reports and 2018 DEP Consent Order. Tabs W4 -G and W4 -A (3) (3) FL Rural Water Association report dated April, 2017. Tab W4 -E Estimated Cost: $140,000 M2019\2019D0)\EW Design -Reports -Tech Memos\62 Design SvbRiptal-Tech Memos-Report\Wates-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-05 Replace AC Water Mall, E.C..xkx Project Category Priority Calculated Priority Matrix: Category Ranking Rating Factor Permit Violations/Public Health & Safety: 5 2 10 Operational Safety Risks: 4 1 4 Immediate Reliability Concerns: 3 4 12 Longer Term Reliability Concerns: 2 4 8 Possible Cost Savings: 1 1 1 Priority Rank 35 (Rank & Rating: 1 = lowest, 5 = highest) Estimated Cost: $140,000 M2019\2019D0)\EW Design -Reports -Tech Memos\62 Design SvbRiptal-Tech Memos-Report\Wates-Project Data Sheets & Cost Est\W-05 Replace AC Water Mall, E.C..xkx Prepared for CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Collier County PROJECT COST ESTIMATE UTILITY SYSTEMS - EVERGLADES CITY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION $19,300 25% Contingency $24,200 Cost Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost (rounded) Remove existing asbestos cement water main 1,100 sf $25 $27,500 Install new 6 -inch water mains 1,100 ea $45 $49,500 Install new fire hydrants 3 ea $5,000 $15,000 Install new 6 -inch valves 3 ea $1,500 $4,500 ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Total Estimated Construction Cost $96,500 20% Engineering and CEI Services $19,300 25% Contingency $24,200 TOTAL (rounded up) $140,000 H:\2019\2019007\EN\G Design -Reports -Tech Memos\G2 Design Submittal -Tech Memos-Report\Water-Project Data Sheets & Cost Ext\W-05 Replace AC Water Maln Cost Estxlsx PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM vKV11 "I, Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 WATER SYSTEM ASSETS - INVENTORY AND CONDITION 4 Pages PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM ASSETS INVENTORY AND CONDITION A. Water System Overview 1 Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 B. Raw Water Wells Inventory Everglades City pumps water from the Surficial Aquifer utilizing two 8 -inch wells with submersible pumps located at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in Copeland on Jane's Scenic Drive, which is approximately 6 miles from the city limits of Everglades City and 7 miles from the Water Booster Station. 1 The wells are located approximately 600 feet from the WTP. 1 Report by Florida Rural Water Association, April 2017. Unit Descri tion Water Supply Connection — Customer Breakdown No. 1,620 3/4" meters connected to potable water No. 1 V meters connected to potable water No. 0 1 1/2" meters connected to potable water No. 3 2" meters connected to potable water No. 2 3" meters connected to potable water No. 0 4" meters connected to potable water No. 1 6" meters connected to potable water No. 2 8" meters connected to potable water The Drinking Water Network High Service Pumps No. 2 Jockey Pumps No. 2 Concrete & Metal Storage Tanks Storage 2 - 0.5 MG Distribution Mains Linear Feet 146,528 ft Valves No. 61 Hydrants No. 101 Automatic Flushing Devices No. 7 Backflow Prevention Device No. 13 General Water Supply Information Number of Connections No. 1,629 Storage Capacity MG 1.0 Reserve Storage Days 2 How Sourced Description Two 8" Wells drilled 37' into Surficial Aquifer Design Capacity Gallons/Day 465,000 Average Daily Consumption Gallons/Day 240,000 Water Supply Asset Values Replacement Value $13,812,689 B. Raw Water Wells Inventory Everglades City pumps water from the Surficial Aquifer utilizing two 8 -inch wells with submersible pumps located at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in Copeland on Jane's Scenic Drive, which is approximately 6 miles from the city limits of Everglades City and 7 miles from the Water Booster Station. 1 The wells are located approximately 600 feet from the WTP. 1 Report by Florida Rural Water Association, April 2017. PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 A Water Use Permit from the SFWMD was issued on May 2, 2018 and covers two shallow wells installed in 2014 for a maximum withdrawal rate of 11.55 MG maximum month. The two existing wells were installed in 2014. Condition Standby generator power should be added to both well pumps for compliance with FL DEP regulations. C. Water Treatment Plant Inventory An upgrade to the existing WTP was completed in 2014. This upgrade included two feed pumps, two nanofiltration skids, chemical feed systems, and new concentrate tank. The existing 0.5 MG storage tank with aerator and the two transfer pumps were originally installed in the 1970s. Both pumps are vertical turbines installed in buried steel cans. One transfer pump was rebuilt in 2018. The Florida DEP permit indicates the upgraded plant's maximum capacity is 465,000 gallons/day. The primary features of the WTP are listed below. 1. A sulfuric acid feed system 350 -gallon tote with two feed pumps each rated at 1.0 gph (one pump is standby). 2. A scale inhibitor feed system 55 -gallon drum with two feed pumps each rated at 0.10 gph (one pump is standby). 3. Two cartridge filters with a capacity of 195 gpm each. 4. Two membrane feed pumps with a maximum capacity of 195 gpm each. 5. Two Nanofiltration (NF) treatment trains, each with a capacity of 175 gpm/250,000 gpd for a total capacity of 350 gpm or 500,000 gpd. 6. A hypochlorite feed system 350 -gallon tote with two feed pumps, each rated at 1.07 gph (one pump is standby. 7. An ammonium sulfate feed system 55 -gallon drum with two feed pumps each rated at 0.15 gph (one pump is standby). 8. A sodium hydroxide feed system 350 -gallon tote with feed pumps each rated at 1.04 gph (one pump is standby). 9. A 15,000 gallon capacity concentrate equalization tank with a transfer pump rated at 100 gpm and an air gap between the tank and the Carnestown Lift Station. 10. Two transfer pumps for transferring the water to the Booster Pump Station. 11. An aerator and a 500,000 gallon capacity Ground Storage Tank (GST). 12. Two transfer pumps with a capacity of 350 gpm each for pumping to the Water Booster Pump Station. The concentrate from the membrane filters is pumped to the Carnestown sewage pump station for transfer to the Everglades City Water Reclamation Facility. 9 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 The WTP is located in Copeland, and it discharges all treated water to the Water Booster Pump Station located in Everglades City. This Booster Pump Station pumps all flow from the WTP to the water distribution system. Condition An inspection report by the Florida Rural Water Association dated September 2016 stated many components need maintenance and replacement, including the transfer pump cans that are now 40 to 50 years old. A compliance inspection was conducted by the Florida DEP on February 13, 2017 that identified 20 Areas of Concern including eight continuing areas of non-compliance from a prior DEP inspection. The Areas of Concern included a lack of standby power for the two well pumps, insufficient standby power for the WTP, unauthorized discharges, leaking pumps and piping, inoperable chemical systems, improper discharge of concentrate, inadequate SCADA system, and an absence of any maintenance records. The WTP needs action to address the issues described in the DEP inspection reports. Significant upgrades are needed, which include new transfer pumps and pump cans, new control and SCADA systems, improvements to the electrical system, and replacement or upgrade of the standby generator and fuel system. D. Water Booster Pump Station Inventory The booster pump station consists of two high service pumps, two jockey pumps, and one diesel driven emergency fire service pump and a 500,000 gallon capacity GST. The pump station and GST were constructed in 1979. There are two centrifugal high service pumps; one pump is rated at 30 hp/400 gpm, and one is rated at 25 hp/325 gpm. The two jockey pumps are each rated at 10 hp/175 gpm. These serve to assist in maintaining pressure within the distribution system. Additionally, there are two 1.5 hp/100 gpm recirculation pumps which serve to reduce stagnant water within the GST. 2 These pumps and a 350 kw standby generator are installed in a masonry building. Other major components include large diameter piping, check valves, pressure regulating valves, and a master flowmeter. Condition The building and some of the equipment is 40 years old. The building is in poor condition and needs significant repair and possible replacement. The structural roof and roofing systems should be inspected and may require significant work. The fire pump, jockey pumps and recirculation pumps are reported to be not operational. These pumps and one high service pump and all valving over 30 years old should be replaced. (One pump was recently rebuilt and fitted with a new motor.) Additional significant upgrades should include the SCADA systems and improvements to the electrical system. Repairs should be made to leaking piping and pumps, and additional pipe supports are needed. The GST is 40 years old and, following cleaning and inspection, may require some repair and coatings. The standby generator and ATS should receive complete maintenance and system testing. 2 Report by Florida Rural Water Association, April 2017. 3 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 E. Distribution System Inventory The majority of the City's water distribution system was constructed in the early 1980s. Water pipes currently range in age from the 1930's (over 80 years old) to 2014. Pipe materials include asbestos cement and PVC. PVC is the most common material in the system. Most of the distribution system is made up of 6 -inch PVC pipe, however there are mains ranging in sizes from I -inch to 8 -inch. Most of the distribution piping is nearing the end of its expected useful life. s The Everglades City water system serves areas both within and outside City limits. Much of the distribution system is condensed within the City limits, however there are long segments of water main serving Plantation Island and Cholcoloslcee. The 6 -inch water main to Plantation Island is approximately 7,00 feet long. The 12 -inch water main to Cholcoloslcee is approximately 18,000 feet long. Condition As previously noted, some water mains in Everglades City are 1 to 4 inches in diameter, which is inadequate for proper fire flow and creates a public safety issue. Approximately 23,600 feet of water main needs to be upsized to 6 -inch to allow adequate fire flow. Approximately SS additional fire hydrants will also be needed. There is approximately 1,100 ft of 4 -inch pipe in the area west of Copeland Avenue and south of Jasmine Street, which is likely Asbestos Cement pipe and was installed in the 1930s. This pipe should be replaced with PVC. The Everglades City fire department perforins regular flow testing, exercising, and maintenance on all 101 fire hydrants. Of serious concern is that at least seven of the fire hydrants on record the fire department has indicated to be either missing or out of service. These fire hydrants should be immediately repaired or replaced. 3 The City does not currently have a regular valve exercising program for the 61 isolation valves in its water distribution system. Due to the age of the water distribution system, it is unlikely each of these valves would function properly during an emergency. All valves should be checked for operation and replaced as needed. Valves over 30 years old should be scheduled for replacement. F. Asset Maintenance and Replacement Independent assessments by the FL DEP and by others have described insufficient maintenance and replacement actions by Everglades City. These documents also identify the lack of a preventative maintenance plan as well as maintenance records for the WTP. This situation has apparently existing for an extended period and likely reduces the normal expected life of many assets in the Drinking Water System. 3 Report by Florida Rural Water Association, April 2017. 0 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR PROJECTS 311 Pages PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PROJECTS TABLE OF CONTENTS NO. OF TAB TITLE PAGES W4 -A Consent Final Judgment Florida DEP vs Everglades City and Cover Letter from 8 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A., July 6, 2018 W4 -B South Florida Water Management District, Everglades City, Water Use Individual 22 Permit, May 2, 2018 W4 -C Hole Montes Completion Report Repairs to Distribution System Pump Water Treatment Plant near Copeland, May 2017 W4 -D Completion Report Upgrades and Repairs Potable Water Pump Station at Copeland Avenue and Camellia Street, May 2017 W4 -E Florida Rural Water Association Email, Everglades City Water System Draft 130 Drinking Water Fiscal Sustainability Analysis & Asset Management Plan, April 25, 2017 W4 -F Collier County Letter of March 20, 2017 and Florida DEP Letter of March 3, 2017 5 Regarding Everglades City Utilities W4 -G Florida DEP Compliance Inspection Report, February 17, 2017 10 W4 -H Florida Rural Water Association Email, Everglades City Water System Critical 4 Needs, January 20, 2017 W4 -I Hole Montes Report on Water and Wastewater Utility System, A Briefing to 24 Consider Possible Risk, April 4, 2016 W4 -J Florida DEP, Everglades City Master System Notice of Permit, January 31, 2013 W4 -K Tetra Tech, Everglades City, Water System Improvements Project, February 25, 2011 W4 -L Big Cypress Basin, Everglades City, Water Management System Master Plan Implementation, Memorandum dated February 25, 2011 W4 -M Tetra Tech, Everglades City, Water System Master Plan, September 30, 2010 42 W4 -N Anchor Engineering Consultants, Water and Sewer Systems Mapping, March 2000 37 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER SYSTEM Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT FLORIDA DEP vs EVERGLADES CITY AND COVER LETTER FROM WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, P.A. JULY 612018 8 Pages WOODWARD, PIRES,& LOM.BARDO, P.A. EST. 1971 ATTORNEYS AT LAW CRAIG F. WOODWARD Boani Cnifi,] Reil Fsnm MARK J. WOODWARD B,,.I C,r6kd Rc 1l%mm ANTI IONY P. FIRES. JR. July 6, 2018 R,,,d Ceulli'A Cip;Cannry, - md [sn-iJ Coetmn�ent J. CHRISTOPHER LOMBARDO B.] CCI(Ifilll; j"himl Ronald W. Hoenstine, Esq. --.--- Florida Department of Environmental Protection CALL IB NE A. ILINTER 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS 35 Tallahassee, FL 32399 SABA F. HAN LEY OfCmt�l Re: File No. 15 -CA -2134 Lk..'] m IT ' .'A INC STATE OF FL DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. EVERGLADES CITY, FLORIDA JENNIFER I. DEVRIES JENNIFER M. TENNEY Dear Mr. Hoenstine: LENORE T. BRAKEFIELD JOSEPH M. COLEMAN In connection with the above referenced case, enclosed for your signature is Consent Final Judgment. Please execute and return the KENNETH V DY original to our office in the enclosed envelope provided. ZACI'1ARY W, LOMBAMRDO ANTHONY)FILIMOILA If you have an questions, ;«„�,,;,,ID[MO H Y y q please feel free to contact me, Thank you. Sincerely, Lenore T. Brakefield, Esq, RE PLY TO: Enclosure i* 32OU TAMIAMI FRAIL N, SUECE 200 NAPLES, FL 34103 239-649-6555 237 649 7342 FAX ❑ 606 BALD FAGLF DRIVE e SUITE 500 P.O. BOX ONE �5 n MARCO ISLAND, FL 34146 239-31•I-5161 `i }"a 234642-6.702 FAX E• LE 0 WWW.WPL—LECALCOM • 1- as IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUI'P IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Plaintiff, VS. Case No.: 11 -2015 -CA -002134 EVERGLADES CITY, Defendant. CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("Department"), and Defendant, Everglades City ("Defendant"), to resolve the matters at issue withotrt the necessity of further litigation, have consented to the entry of this Consent Final Judgment ("Judgment") Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Article V, Section 5, of the Florida Constitution, and sections 26,012, 120.69, 373.129, 403.121, 403.13t, 403.141, and 403.161, Florida Statutes. 2. The Department is the administrative agency of the State of Florida having the power and dirty to administer and enforce the provisions of chapters 373, 376, and 403, Florida Statutes, and the regulations promulgated thereunder in title 62, Florida Administrative Code. 3. Defendant owns and operates a public drinking water facility located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive, Copeland, Florida. Defendant also owns and operates a domestic wastewater treatment facility located at 401 South Copeland Avenue, Everglades City, Florida (the "Facilities"). Page 1 (,)f'7 4. Defendant agrees to have a licensed operator (or licensed operators) operate the Facilities pursuant to Chapter 62-699, F.A.C. 5. Within 120 days of entry of this Judgment, Defendant: shall complete an Asset Management Plan for the treatment portion of its Facilities', specifically the public drinking water facility located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive, Copeland, Florida, and the domestic wastewater treatment facility located at 401 South Copeland Avenue, Everglades City, Florida, shall have written procedures in place to immediately implement these plans, and shall immediately implement these plans. Within 150 days of entry of this Judgment, Defendant shall formally adopt these plans (including the implementation of sustainable rate structures) by ordinance or resolution. Each Asset Management Plan shall include: (a) Identification of all assets within the system; (b) An evaluation of the current age, condition, and anticipated useful life of each asset; (c) The current value of the assets; (d) The cost to operate and maintain all assets; (e) A capital improvement plan based on a survey of industry standards, life expectancy, life cycle analysis, and retraining useful life; (f) An analysis of funding needs; (g) An analysis of population growth and flow projections, and a model for impact fees; commercial, industrial, and residential rate structures; and industrial pretreatment fees and parameters; (h) The establishment of an adequate funding sustainable rate structure (including consideration of loan repayments); (i) A threshold tate set to ensure the proper operation of the utility, if the Defendant transfers any of the utility proceeds to other funds, the sustainable rates must be set higher than the threshold rate to facilitate the transfer and proper operation of the utility; and U) A plan to preserve the assets; renewal, replacement, and repair of the assets as necessary, and a tisk-benefit analysis to determine the optimum renewal or replacement time. I The Asset Management plan for the cotlection and disposal system portions of its domestic wastewater treannent facility must he completed and submitted in accordance with the 245 -day timchatne specified in Paragraph 7. after Defendant hires an engineer within the 120 -day limeirame specified in Paragraph T. Page 2 of 7 s� 6. Within 1,825 days after entry of this Judgment, regardless of whether public or State Revolving Fund assistance is received, Defendant shall complete construction of a new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility, and shall submit a completed DEP Form 62-620.910(12), Notification of Completion of Construction for Wastewater Facilities or Activities, expressly stating that the new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility has been completed in accordance with all applicable requirements. Ground breaking must occur within 1,460 days. All necessary Department permit applications must be submitted and complete within 1,095 days after entry of this Judgment. Any third -parry permit challenge shall temporarily toll all deadlines in this Judgment that are directly impacted by said challenge until said challenge is resolved. Defendant shall provide written quarterly progress reports to the Department regarding the status of funding, wastewater treatment facility replacement, and necessary .improvements and corrective actions to the collection system and effluent disposal/reuse systems, within '10 days following the end of each calendar quarter, commencing immediately following entry of this Judgment. If a compliant temporary wastewater treatment plant is made operational before the expiration of any deadlines in this paragraph, then all deadlines in this paragraph shall be extended by 730 days. 7. Defendant shall analyze the collection system and effluent disposal/reuse systems and generate a list of proposed necessary improvements to bring the collection system into full compliance with Chapter 62-604, F.A.C., and the effluent disposal/reuse system into full compliance with Chapter 62-610, F.A.C., and submit those proposed necessary improvements and proposed Constriction and implementation schedules to the Department for approval. Once approved by the Department, Defendant shall adhere to the approved construction and implementation schedules. Any third -party permit challenge shall temporarily toll all deadlines in Page 3 of 7 this Judgment that are directly impacted by said challenge until said challenge is resolved. Defendant shall have 120 days after entry of this Judgment to hire an engineer to generate the proposed necessary improvements and proposed construction and implementation schedules. Defendant shall then have a reasonable time, not to exceed 245 additional days, to generate the proposed constriction and implementation schedules for approval by the Department. 'Che proposed schedules shall not exceed 1,825 days from Department approval. 8. In lieu of paying stipulated penalties as contemplated by the Department's Complaint and the Consent Order between the Department and Defendant executed on April 4, 2013 (i.e. OGC File No. 13-0853-1 l -DW), the Defendant agrees to do the following: A) For a period of ten (10) years following the entry of this.judgment, Defendant shall, as necessary but at least every two years, update its Facilities' Asset Management Plans, using the latest available information to improve the overall accuracy of the plans. If a plan update concludes that a rate structure must, be revised to continue the sustainability of proper utility operation, then the Defendant shall adopt the new sustainable rate structure by ordinance or resolution within 30 days of the plan update. B) For a period of ten (10) years following the entry of this judgment, Defendant shall, at least annually, submit an Operation and Maintenance Performance Report meeting all the requirements of Rule 62-600.735, Florida Administrative Code, and a Capacity Analysis Report meeting all the requirements of Rule 62-600,405, Florida Administrative Code. C) For a period of ten (10) years following the entry of this judgment, Defendant shall correct all Facilities' violations and/or deficiencies that the Department notifies the Defendant of in writing within 45 days of such written notification or correct said violations immediately if Department determines the violations to be an imminent hazard to the public Page 4 of 7 health, safety, or welfare. On a case-by-case basis, the Department and Defendant are authorized to revise the 45 -day deadline if such revision is agreed to in writing by both parties. Any such revision shall include a similar extension to the penalties imposed by paragraph 12. D) After ten (10) years, these requirements will be governed by the applicable Florida Statutes and/or Florida Administrative Code, 9. This Judgment is a settlement of the Department's civil and administrative authority arising under Florida law to resolve the matters addresses herein. This .hidgmentis not settlement of any criminal liabilities which may arise under Florida law. This Judgment does not constitute settlement of any matters that are not contained in the Complaint or this Judgment, nor does it constitute settlement of any violations that may arise in the future. 10. No modifications of the terms of this Judgment shall be effective until reduced to writing, executed by both the Department and Defendant, and approved by the Court. 11. The Departanent hereby expressly reserves the right to initiate appropriate legal action to prevent or prohibit the future violation of applicable statutes, or the rules promulgated thereunder, that are not specifically addressed by the terms of this Judgment. 12. If the Defendant fails to comply with any paragraph of this Judgment, the Department may seek any and all judicial remedies available. Defendant agrees to pay the Department stipulated penalties in the amount of $1,000.00 per day for each and every day that Defendant fails to timely comply with any requirements of this Judgment. 13. The transfer of the Facilities, by any means or for any reason without the consent of the Department, shall not affect or be construed to affect the Defendant's obligations under this Judgment. Page 5 of 7 14. The provisions of this Judgment are only binding upon the Department and the Defendant, and should not be construed to affect any rights the Department may have against any other responsible parties for the violations addressed herein. 15. If any event occurs which causes delay, or the reasonable likelihood of delay, in complying with the requirements or deadlines of this Judgment, the Defendant shall have the burden of proving that the delay was caused by circumstances beyond Defendant's reasonable control and could not have been overcome by Defendant's due diligence. Economic circumstances shall not be considered circumstances beyond the control of the Defendant. 16. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees in this matter. 17, This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Consent Final Judgment by contempt or other appropriate sanctions or remedies, and issue such other and future orders as may be appropriate. 18. The Department and the Defendant agree that Defendant's failure to comply with any terms of this Consent Final Judgment for a period exceeding 90 days shall result in an order stating that the Defendant has constructively abandoned its utility systems, which shall be deemed to act as the 60 days' notice of abandonment required by section 367.165, Florida Statutes, and shall require the appointment of a receiver for the utility systems in accordance with the timelines ill section 367.165, Florida Statutes. This paragraph shall no longer be effective after the completion of the new complete replacement domestic wastewater treatment facility pursuant to paragraph 6. Page 6 of 7 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in Chatnbets in Collier County, Florida, this _ day of July, 2018. Honorable Lauren L. Brodie Circuit Judge CONSENT AND MOTION TO ENTER THIS FINAL JUDGMENT WE DO HEREBY AGREE AND CONSENT TO THE COURT'S ENTRY OF THIS CONSENT FINAL. JUDGMENT WITHOUT FURTHER HEARING IN SATISFACTION OF THE CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE COMPLAINT IN THIS CASE BETWEEN THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL' PROTECTION AND EVERGLADES CITY. THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT JOINTLY MOVE THAT THE COURT ENTER THIS CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT. T D ENDIT: FOR TH P AIINTIF�: Mayor Howell Grimm, Jr.� b Jon Iglehart City of Everglades City Director of District Management, South District, Florida Department of Environmental Protection J. Christopher Lombardo, Esq. Florida Bar No. 372641 Lenore T. Brakefield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 0011083 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 606 Bald Eagle Drive, Suite 500 P.O. Box One Marco Island, FL 34146 (239)394-5161 clonihrtdo(cp iol lc�al.com Ibrake field 01wol-let)aI.cc) tit Attorneys for Defendant Ronald W. Hoenstine, Esq. Florida Bar No. 31838 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard MS 35 Tallahassee, FL 32399 (850)245-2289 R_onnie.W.Hoentclue @'deo stat_e,fLns_ Attorney for Alaha ff Page 7 of 7 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -B SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT EVERGLADES CITY WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT, MAY 29 2018 22 Pages SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT W WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION NO: 170831-16 PERMIT NUMBER: 11-00160-W DATE ISSUED: May 2, 2018 EXPIRATION DATE: May 2, 2023 PERMITTEE: CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY 102 BROADWAY AVENUE EAST EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139 PROJECT NAME: EVERGLADES CITY P W S PROJECT LOCATION: Collier County, S7,12,13,25/T52S/R29E PROJECT DESCRIPTION/AUTHORIZING: S11, 13-15, 23,24,36/T53S/R29E The use of groundwater from the surficial aquifer system for public water supply for the City of Everglades City service area serving 1,196 persons in the year 2023 with a finished water per capita use rate of 203 gallons per day with an annual allocation of 106.65 million gallons. This is to notify you of South Florida Water Management District's (District) agency action concerning Permit Application Number 170831-16, received August 31, 2017. This action is taken pursuant to Chapter 373, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), Rule 40E-1.603 and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to and a Water Use Individual Permit is in effect for this project subject to: 1. Not receiving a filed request for an administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120.57, F.S. and Section 120.569, F.S., or a request for a judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, F.S. 2. The attached 33 permit conditions. 3. The attached 11 exhibits. By acceptance and utilization of the water authorized under this permit, the Permittee agrees to hold and save the District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims or liabilities that may arise by reason of the construction, maintenance or use of activities authorized by this permit. Should you object to the permit, please refer to the attached "Notice of Rights" that addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Should you wish to object to the proposed agency action or file a petition or request, please provide written objections, petitions, requests and/or waivers to: Office of the District Clerk, South Florida Water Management District, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33406, or by email to clerk@sfwmd.gov. CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT this written notice has been mailed or electronically transmitted to the Permittee (and the persons listed in the attached distribution list) this 2nd day of May, 2018, in accordance with Section 120.60(3), F.S. Notice was also electronically posted on this date through a link on the home page of the District's website (my.sfwmd.gov/ePermitting). {may BY: ` Maria C. Clemente, P.E. Bureau Chief Water Use Bureau Application Number: 170831-16 PAGE 1 OF 7 SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. This permit is issued to: City of Everglades City 102 Broadway Avenue East Everglades City, FL 34139 2. This permit shall expire on May 2, 2023. 3. Use classification is: Public Water Supply 4. Source classification is: Groundwater from: Surficial Aquifer System 5. Allocation: Total annual allocation is 106.65 million gallons (MG). (292,192 GPD) Total maximum monthly allocation is 11.55 million gallons (MG). These allocations represent the amount of water required to meet the water demands as a result of a rainfall deficit during a drought with the probability of recurring one year in ten. The Permittee shall not exceed these allocations in hydrologic conditions less than a 1 -in -10 year drought event. Compliance with the annual allocation is based on the quantity withdrawn over a 12 -month time period. Compliance with the maximum monthly allocation is based on the greatest quantity withdrawn in any single month. The annual allocation expressed in GPD or MGD is for informational purposes only. If the rainfall deficit is more severe than that expected to recur once every ten years, the withdrawals shall not exceed that amount necessary to continue to meet the reasonable -beneficial demands under such conditions, provided no harm to the water resources occur and: 1. All other conditions of the permit are met; and 2. The withdrawal is otherwise consistent with applicable declared Water Shortage Orders in effect pursuant to Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 6. Withdrawal facilities: Groundwater - Existing: Page 2 of 7 Application Number: 170831-16 2 - 8" X 37'X 375 GPM Wells Cased To 22 Feet 7. The Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the permit conditions to: SFWMD at www.sfwmd.gov/ePermitting, or Regulatory Support, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33406. 8. The Permittee must submit the appropriate application form incorporated by reference in Rule 40E-2.101, F.A.C., to the District prior to the permit expiration date in order to continue the use of water. 9. The Permittee shall secure a well construction permit prior to construction, repair, or abandonment of all wells, as described in Chapter 40E-3, F.A.C. 10. Every five years from the date of last calibration, the Permittee shall submit re -calibration data for each withdrawal facility. 11. Prior to any withdrawals at the project, the Permittee shall provide the results of the calibration testing of the identified water accounting method(s) and equip all existing and proposed withdrawal facilities with approved water use accounting method(s) pursuant to Subsection 4.1.1 of the Applicant's Handbook for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District. 12. Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be reported to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 13. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary that results in a change in demand that affects its permitted allocation. The allocation shall be modified to effectuate such change. 15. If at any time there is an indication that the well casing, valves, or controls leak or have become inoperative, repairs or replacement shall be made to restore the system to an operating condition. Failure to make such repairs shall be cause for filling and abandoning the well, in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapter 40E-3, F.A.C. 16. The Standard Water Conservation Plan described in Subsection 2.3.2.F.1.a of the Applicant's Handbook for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District and the Staff Report, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule described in the following exhibit: Exhibit 9 contains the water conservation plan. The Permittee will provide an annual report summarizing the implementation of the water conservation plan and describe its changes to the per capita use rate. The report is due April 30 of each calendar year for the duration of the water Page 3 of 7 Application Number: 170831-16 use permit. 17. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of entering into an inter -local agreement, contract, or other similar instrument to deliver or receive water outside of its service area or to serve a demand not identified to determine the allocation described in this permit. A copy of such agreement shall be provided to the District. The monthly volume of water delivered and/or received via each inter -local agreement, contract, or other similar instrument shall be submitted to the District at the same reporting frequency as the withdrawals for each withdrawal facility required in this permit. 18. The Permittee shall implement the wellfield operating plan submitted in support of the permit application, as described in the District staff report. 19. The Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 20. The Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the point of discharge from the treatment plant for the purpose of measuring the daily flow of water. 21. The Permittee shall determine unaccounted-fordistribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Reports shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis and are due by April 30th of each year. 22. Entities that control, either directly or indirectly, a wastewater treatment plant and/or reuse distribution system, and which have determined pursuant to Section 403.064, F.S., that use of reclaimed water is feasible, must provide the District with annual updates of the following information: (A) the status of distribution system construction, including location and capacity of lines; (B) a summary of uncommitted supplies for the next year; (C) copies of any new or amended local mandatory reclaimed water reuse zone ordinances; and (D) a list of end-users who have contracted to receive reclaimed water and the agreed upon quantity of water to be delivered. 23. The Permittee shall implement the following saline water intrusion monitoring program: Water from Wells 6 and 7 shall be sampled on a monthly basis and analyzed for dissolved chloride concentrations. The data shall be submitted to the District on a quarterly basis. Page 4 of 7 Application Number: 170831-16 STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS All water uses authorized by this permit shall be implemented as conditioned by this permit, including any documents incorporated by reference in a permit condition. The District may revoke this permit, in whole or in part, or take enforcement action, pursuant to Section 373.136 or 373.243, F.S., unless a permit modification has been obtained to address the noncompliance. The Permittee shall immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted material information that is later discovered to be inaccurate. 2. The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations. 3. The Permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, transfer, or conveyance of ownership or any other loss of permitted legal control of the Project and/or related facilities from which the permitted consumptive use is made. Where Permittee's control of the land subject to the permit was demonstrated through a lease, the Permittee must either submit a new or modified lease showing that it continues to have legal control or documentation showing a transfer in control of the permitted system/project to the new landowner or new lessee. All transfers of ownership are subject to the requirements of Rule 4011-1.6107, F.A.C. Alternatively, the Permittee may surrender the consumptive use permit to the District, thereby relinquishing the right to conduct any activities under the permit. 4. Nothing in this permit should be construed to limit the authority of the District to declare a water shortage and issue orders pursuant to Chapter 373, F.S. In the event of a declared water shortage, the Permittee must adhere to the water shortage restrictions, as specified by the District. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, reports shall be submitted as required by District rule or order. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage, water levels, and water quality data shall be collected and submitted as required by District orders issued pursuant to Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 5. This permit does not convey to the Permittee any property rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any applicable local government, state, or federal law, rule, or ordinance. 6. With advance notice to the Permittee, District staff with proper identification shall have permission to enter, inspect, observe, collect samples, and take measurements of permitted facilities to determine compliance with the permit conditions and permitted plans and specifications. The Permittee shall either accompany District staff onto the property or make provision for access onto the property. A. The Permittee may seek modification of any term of an unexpired permit. The Permittee is advised that Section 373.239, F.S., and Rule 40E-2.331, F.A.C., are applicable to permit modifications. B. The Permittee shall notify the District in writing 30 days prior to any changes to the project that Page 5 of 7 Application Number: 170831-16 could potentially alter the reasonable demand reflected in the permitted allocation. Such changes include, but are not limited to, change in irrigated acreage, crop type, irrigation system, large users agreements, or water treatment method. Permittee will be required to apply for a modification of the permit for any changes in permitted allocation. 8. If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and modification, enforcement action, or revocation pursuant to Chapter 373, F.S. 9. The Permittee shall mitigate interference with existing legal uses that was caused in whole or in part by the Permittee's withdrawals, consistent with the approved mitigation plan. As necessary to offset the interference, mitigation will include pumpage reduction, replacement of the impacted individual's equipment, relocation of wells, change in withdrawal source, or other means. Interference to an existing legal use is defined as an impact that occurs under hydrologic conditions equal to or less severe than a 1 -in -10 year drought event that results in the: A. Inability to withdraw water consistent with provisions of the permit, such as when remedial structural or operational actions not materially authorized by existing permits must be taken to address the interference; or B. Change in the quality of water pursuant to primary State Drinking Water Standards to the extent that the water can no longer be used for its authorized purpose, or such change is imminent. 10. The Permittee shall mitigate harm to the natural resources caused by the Permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the Permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance includes: A. Reduction in ground or surface water levels that results in harmful lateral movement of the fresh water/salt water interface, B. Reduction in water levels that harm the hydroperiod of wetlands, C. Significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occurring water body such as a lake or pond, D. Harmful movement of contaminants in violation of state water quality standards, or E. Harm to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11. The Permittee shall mitigate harm to existing off-site land uses caused by the Permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the Permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance, includes: Page 6 of 7 Application Number: 1 70831-1 6 A. Significant reduction in water levels on the property to the extent that the designed function of the water body and related surface water management improvements are damaged, not including aesthetic values. The designed function of a water body is identified in the original permit or other governmental authorization issued for the construction of the water body. In cases where a permit was not required, the designed function shall be determined based on the purpose for the original construction of the water body (e.g. fill for construction, mining, drainage canal, etc.) B. Damage to agriculture, including damage resulting from reduction in soil moisture resulting from consumptive use; or, C. Land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels associated with consumptive use. Page 7 of 7 Application Number: 170831-16 Last Date for Agency Action: July 24, 2018 WATER USE STAFF REPORT Application Number: 170831-16 Permit Number: 11-00160-W Prosect Name: EVERGLADES CITY P W S Water Use Permit Status: MODIFICATION/RENEWAL Location: COLLIER COUNTY, 37,12,13,25/T52S/R29E S11, 13-15, 23, 24, 36/T53S/R29E Applicant's Name and CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY Address: 102 BROADWAY AVENUE EAST EVERGLADES CITY, FL 34139 Water Use Classification Sources: Groundwater from: Authorized Allocation: Annual Allocation: Public Water Supply Surficial Aquifer System 106.65 Million Gallons (MG) Maximum Monthly Allocation: 11.55 Million Gallons (MG) Existing Withdrawal Facilities - Groundwater Source: Surficial Aquifer System 2 - 8" X 37'X 375 GPM Wells Cased to 22 Feet Rated Capacity Source Surficial Aquifer System Totals: Status Code GPM MGM E 750 32.8 750 32.8 MGY 394 394 PURPOSE The purpose of this application is to renew and modify Water Use Permit 11-00160-W for public water supply serving the City of Everglades City service area. Public water supply withdrawals are from the surficial aquifer system (SAS). PROJECT DESCRIPTION Everglades City PWS (Project) is an existing public water supply utility located in southern Collier County, as depicted in Exhibits 1 and 2. Withdrawals are from the SAS via two existing withdrawal facilities. The facility locations are depicted in Exhibit 3 and the withdrawal facility details are listed in Exhibit 4. Raw groundwater is treated using a Page 1 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) nano -filtration membrane softening system with sodium hypochlorite disinfection, at a permitted finished water treatment capacity of 0.5 million gallons (MG) daily. The maximum monthly allocation has been decreased from 12.22 MG to 11.55 MG. The annual allocation has been increased from 91.71 MG to 106.65 MG. These modified allocations will serve a projected population of 1,196 at a finished water per capita use rate of 203 gallons per day in the year 2023. The allocations have been modified as a result of a decrease in the projected population and an increase in the per capita use rate. The Project's Water Conservation Plan discusses how the Permittee will attempt to lower the per capita use rate. There are currently no transfers of water through interconnects with other utilities. Operational Plan: Raw water is withdrawn from the wells and treated on-site at the Water Treatment Plant. The finished water is transmitted approximately seven miles south to the Water Booster Station, located at the intersection of Camelia Street and Begonia Street in Everglades City. The Project maintains a total of 1.0 MG of storage, contained in two storage tanks. Permit History: The Project was originally permitted for public water supply withdrawals from the SAS in 1979. There have been several renewals and modifications. The water use permit was most recently modified on September 5, 2012 to account for revised demand projections and to abandon the previous wellfield and replace it with the currently permitted wellfield. PROJECTED WATER USE DEMANDS The estimated population of the service area in the year 2018 was 1,160 persons. The total projected service area population in the year 2023, near the end of the recommended five year permit duration, is approximately 1,196 persons, according to projections provided by the Applicant. Population projections submitted for this application were found to be consistent with the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan 2017 Update, as specified in Subsection 2.3.2.F.5 of the Applicant's Handbook (AH) for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District (District). The average finished water per capita use rate of 203 gallons daily and the maximum monthly peaking ratio of 1.3 were calculated in accordance with Subsections 2.3.2.F.3 and 2.3.2.F.4 of the AH. Past and projected water use and population data are shown on Exhibit 5. Applying the above data, the recommended raw water allocations are 11.55 MG maximum monthly and 106.65 MG total annually. IMPACT EVALUATION In order to determine the potential impacts the groundwater withdrawals from the SAS might have on resources, a drawdown impact analysis using the non -calibrated groundwater flow model (WinFlow) was performed. The modeling data are consistent with the criteria for basic analytical impact assessments set forth in Subsection 3.1.2 of the AH. Aquifer parameters were obtained from an average of the three nearest Page 2 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 IMPACT EVALUATION (CONTINUED) aquifer performance tests within the vicinity of the wellfield. Withdrawal of the recommended allocation was simulated for 90 days with no recharge. The purpose of the analysis was to simulate withdrawals of the maximum monthly allocations during a 1 -in -10 year drought scenario. Model data and drawdown contours, relative to a reference head elevation of 0.0 feet, are depicted in Exhibit 6. WATER RESOURCE IMPACT EVALUATION Water Resource Availability Surficial Aquifer System Land surface elevation at the wellfield is approximately seven feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). The bottom of the SAS within the vicinity of the wellfield is approximately -65 feet NGVD (District Technical Publication WS -35). The lowest recorded water elevation of the SAS, obtained from United States Geological Survey Monitor Well C-995, located approximately 2,400 feet south of the wellfield (Exhibit 2) was 0.34 feet NGVD (Exhibit 7). Groundwater modeling shows a drawdown of approximately 0.3 feet at the wells as a result of the withdrawal of the permitted allocation. This results in approximately 65 feet of available saturated thickness of the SAS in the vicinity of the wellfield. Therefore, the potential for harm to occur to water resource availability of the SAS as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Existing Legal Users Surficial Aquifer System The nearest existing legal user of the SAS is Big Cypress National Preserve (Water Use Permit 11-03933-W), located approximately 2,200 feet southeast of the wellfield (Exhibit 8). Groundwater modeling shows approximately 0.1 foot of drawdown at this existing legal user's nearest SAS well. Therefore, the potential for harm to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Existing Off Site Land Uses Surficial Aquifer System Land uses that are dependent upon water being on or near land surface and that existed prior to this application are protected from harm. The Project is bordered by undeveloped lands. Groundwater modeling shows 0.3 feet or less of drawdown off- site. This amount of drawdown is negligible. Therefore, pursuant to Subsection 3.6.2 of the AH, the use is not expected to result in significant reduction in water levels on the property of an existing offsite land use to the extent that: the designed function of a water body and related surface water management improvements are damaged (not including aesthetic values); or result in damage to agriculture, including damage resulting from reduction in soil moisture resulting from water use, or land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels associated with water use. Page 3 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 WATER RESOURCE IMPACT EVALUATION (CONTINUED) Migration of Saline Water Surficial Aquifer System The nearest source of surface saline water is located approximately three miles south of the wellfield and beyond the Project's cone of depression. The SAS contains fresh water and is not known to contain connate saline water in the vicinity of the wellfield. The SAS is separated from deeper source of saline water by approximately 20 feet of low permeability confining sediments (District Technical Publication WS -35). Per Special Permit Condition 23, the Permittee maintains a saline water monitoring program, and results of the monitoring show relatively stable chloride concentrations, with values in the range of approximately 10 to 60 milligrams per liter. Therefore, the potential for saline water intrusion or upconing to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Wetland Environments Surficial Aquifer System The Project's supply wells are located outside the Picayune Strand and Fakahatchee Estuary Water Reservation Areas. However, State wetland preserves are immediately adjacent to the wells. The wetlands can generally be described as cypress, mixed - forested, wet prairie, and freshwater marsh. The Project has utilized the SAS since 1978 with no reported harm to the surrounding wetlands. Groundwater modeling results indicate a maximum drawdown of 0.3 feet at the wells and less than 0.1 foot of drawdown approximately 400 feet from the wells, under the wetlands. Based on the above information and narrative standard, the potential for harm to occur to the wetlands as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Sources of Pollution Surficial Aquifer System There are no known sources of pollution within the Project's cone of depression. Therefore, the potential for movement of contaminants from known pollution sources as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Regional Issues Water Reservations There are water reservations established for the Picayune Strand and the Fakahatchee Estuary, per Subsections 40E-10.041(1) and (2), Florida Administrative Code. The Project's withdrawal facilities are located outside of the Picayune Strand and the Fakahatchee Estuary. The Project's cone of depression does not extend into the water reservations. Therefore, the Project meets the requirements set forth in Subsection 3.11.1 of the AH. Page 4 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED Project Site Issues Legal Control and Land Use Property records demonstrate that the Permittee maintains legal control over the Project site, pursuant to Subsection 2.1.1 of the AH. All withdrawal facilities are located within the Project boundaries. The water allocation requested for public water supply is compatible with the zoning and land use designation at the site. Water Conservation Plan The Permittee submitted a water conservation plan, pursuant to Subsection 2.3.2.F.1 of the AH, as shown in Exhibit 9. The Permittee will submit an annual report summarizing the implementation of the water conservation plan and describe its changes to the per capita use rate. Permit Duration This is a modification of Water Use Permit 43-01284-W with an increase in quantity of water from the SAS, a source of limited availability (Subsection 1.5.2.6.1 of the AH). Therefore, in accordance with Subsection 1.5.2.1) of the AH, the water use permit shall be issued with a duration of five years. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT STATUS: Not Applicable RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT STATUS: Not Applicable Page 5 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 Project Name Application Number: Permit Number: RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATIONS EVERGLADES CITY P W S 170831-16 11-00160-W The use of groundwater from the surficial aquifer system for public water supply for the City of Everglades City service area serving 1,196 persons in the year 2023 with a finished water per capita use rate of 203 gallons per day with an annual allocation of 106.65 million gallons. STAFF EVALUATION REVIEWER: Matt Brosbus, NRM Andrew Steiner, WU SUPERVISOR: Laura Layman, NRM Alberto J. Naya, WATER USE SECTION ADMINISTRATOR: 1/14 It l .: �s Date: May 2, 2018 Simon Sunderland, P.G. Page 6 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. This permit is issued to: City of Everglades City 102 Broadway Avenue East Everglades City, FL 34139 2. This permit shall expire on May 2, 2023. 3. Use classification is: Public Water Supply 4. Source classification is: Groundwater from: Surficial Aquifer System 5. Allocation: Total annual allocation is 106.65 million gallons (MG). (292,192 GPD) Total maximum monthly allocation is 11.55 million gallons (MG). These allocations represent the amount of water required to meet the water demands as a result of a rainfall deficit during a drought with the probability of recurring one year in ten. The Permittee shall not exceed these allocations in hydrologic conditions less than a 1 -in -10 year drought event. Compliance with the annual allocation is based on the quantity withdrawn over a 12 -month time period. Compliance with the maximum monthly allocation is based on the greatest quantity withdrawn in any single month. The annual allocation expressed in GPD or MGD is for informational purposes only. If the rainfall deficit is more severe than that expected to recur once every ten years, the withdrawals shall not exceed that amount necessary to continue to meet the reasonable -beneficial demands under such conditions, provided no harm to the water resources occur and: 1. All other conditions of the permit are met; and 2. The withdrawal is otherwise consistent with applicable declared Water Shortage Orders in effect pursuant to Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 6. Withdrawal facilities: Page 7 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS Groundwater - Existing: 2 - 8" X 37'X 375 GPM Wells Cased To 22 Feet 7. The Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the permit conditions to: SFWMD at www.sfwmd.gov/ePermitting, or Regulatory Support, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33406. 8. The Permittee must submit the appropriate application form incorporated by reference in Rule 40E-2.101, F.A.C., to the District prior to the permit expiration date in order to continue the use of water. 9. The Permittee shall secure a well construction permit prior to construction, repair, or abandonment of all wells, as described in Chapter 40E-3, F.A.C. 10. Every five years from the date of last calibration, the Permittee shall submit re- calibration data for each withdrawal facility. 11. Prior to any withdrawals at the project, the Permittee shall provide the results of the calibration testing of the identified water accounting method(s) and equip all existing and proposed withdrawal facilities with approved water use accounting method(s) pursuant to Subsection 4.1.1 of the Applicant's Handbook for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District. 12. Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be reported to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 13. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary that results in a change in demand that affects its permitted allocation. The allocation shall be modified to effectuate such change. 15. If at any time there is an indication that the well casing, valves, or controls leak or have become inoperative, repairs or replacement shall be made to restore the system to an operating condition. Failure to make such repairs shall be cause for filling and abandoning the well, in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapter 40E-3, F.A.C. 16. The Standard Water Conservation Plan described in Subsection 2.3.2.F.1.a of the Applicant's Handbook for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District and the Staff Report, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule described in the following exhibit: Page 8 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS Exhibit 9 contains the water conservation plan. The Permittee will provide an annual report summarizing the implementation of the water conservation plan and describe its changes to the per capita use rate. The report is due April 30 of each calendar year for the duration of the water use permit. 17. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of entering into an inter -local agreement, contract, or other similar instrument to deliver or receive water outside of its service area or to serve a demand not identified to determine the allocation described in this permit. A copy of such agreement shall be provided to the District. The monthly volume of water delivered and/or received via each inter -local agreement, contract, or other similar instrument shall be submitted to the District at the same reporting frequency as the withdrawals for each withdrawal facility required in this permit. 18. The Permittee shall implement the wellfield operating plan submitted in support of the permit application, as described in the District staff report. 19. The Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 20. The Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the point of discharge from the treatment plant for the purpose of measuring the daily flow of water. 21. The Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Reports shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis and are due by April 30th of each year. 22. Entities that control, either directly or indirectly, a wastewater treatment plant and/or reuse distribution system, and which have determined pursuant to Section 403.064, F.S., that use of reclaimed water is feasible, must provide the District with annual updates of the following information: (A) the status of distribution system construction, including location and capacity of lines; (B) a summary of uncommitted supplies for the next year; (C) copies of any new or amended local mandatory reclaimed water reuse zone ordinances; and (D) a list of end-users who have contracted to receive reclaimed water and the agreed upon quantity of water to be delivered. 23. The Permittee shall implement the following saline water intrusion monitoring program: Water from Wells 6 and 7 shall be sampled on a monthly basis and analyzed for dissolved chloride concentrations. The data shall be submitted to the District on a quarterly basis. Page 9 of 12 Application Number: 170831-16 TABLE - A Description Of Wells. Application Number: 170831-16 Well ID 263098 263099 Name Well Well? Map Designator Wall Well? FLUWID Number 37 37 Well Field Cased Depth(feel) 22 EzistinglProposed E E Well Diameterlinches) 8 8 Total Deptinneet) 37 37 Cased Depth(feel) 22 22 Facility Me, (ft. NGVD) 5 5 Screened Interval From To Pumped Or Flowing P P Pump Type Electric Turbine Electric Turbine Pump Int. El., -O y Feet(NGVD) -20 -20 N Feet (BLS) 25 25 GPump Capacity(GPM) 375 375 1 Year Drilled Planar Location $ource APPLICANT APPLICANT Feet East 537383 537543 Feet North 590516 590513 X Zr Accounting Method Flow Meter Flow Meter Use Status Primary Primary r -i OWater Use Type Public Water Supply Public Water Supply Aquifer Sudicial Aquifer Suricial Aquifer System System Public Water Supply Demands Application Number: 170831-16 Service Area: CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY System Efficiency: Treatment Name: Standard PCUR: 1 Standard Max Standard Max Monthly Ratio: 1.28 Day Ratio: Past Water Use (Table -F) Average Max Day Average Max Basis Basis Year Population PCUR Use (MGD) Use (MGD) Ratio Monthly Monthly Ratio For For Use(MG) Use (MG) Demand Ratio 2015 1,137 170 0.19 5.87 7.48 1.27 Y Y 2016 1,145 234 0.27 8.13 9.83 1.21 Y Y 2017 1,152 205 0.24 7.18 9.34 1.30 Y Y Protected Water Use(Tabie-G) Recommended Recommended Average Ree Max Basis for Year Population PCUR Average(MGD) Max Day(MGD) Ratio Monthly Monthly Ratio Allocation Use(MG) (MG) -on 2018 1,160 244.31 0.28 8.62 11.0277 1.280 2019 1,168 244.31 0.29 8.68 11.1055 1.280 2020 1,176 244.31 0.29 8.73 11.1794 1.280 2021 1,183 244.31 0.29 8.79 11.2456 1.280 2022 1,189 244.31 0.29 8.83 11.3039 1.280 2023 1,196 244.31 0.29 8.88 11.55 1.300 Y Legend 0. Existing Supply Well and Number -+ Drawdowns (feet) Wetlands (SFWMD) 6215 \ -j 6172 6218 6216 6172 (pppp'Hl .1.418 NIY Well R29E j } R60E 6 {I Transmissivity=1.423e+006 gal/d/k /F I Storage Coefficient=0.01 Yield -0.22 6172 ,1 Specific 0.0006/sq It Porosity Porosity 0.2 j Aquifer Thickness=40 k 6170 6210 1 �?1td. 15 6411 6172 A J 250 'iQ0 6172 6172 11 FIGURE 5-1. POTENTIOMETRIC WATER. LEVEL. DRAWDOWN CONTOUR MAP FOR THE WATER -TABLE AQUIFER DUE TO THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM DAILY QUANTITY (0.48 MGD) WITHDRAWAL FROM THE CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WELLFIELD FOR NINETY DAYS WITH NO RECHARGE TO THE SYSTEM, Exhibit 6 8.0 USGS 255703081213801 C 995 tR �# IkV 7 or b b 0.0 a Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul. Jan Jul Jan 2009 2000 2001 2881 2092. 2002 2003 2003 2004 0.0 9 C H d a 2 B d � 3,0 w L � L ti y 4.8 L a+ s 5.0 —'Period of approved data USGS 255703081213801 C - 985 7.8 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2080 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2818 -`Period of approved data Period of provisional data 0 LJ 4.0 = 0 3.0 � w w 2.8 L 1.8 y L L B.9 � Exhibit 7 t F u,• { .,;• X15 .5 {..+� .,+:: � •. it+�� 7.8 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2080 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2818 -`Period of approved data Period of provisional data 0 LJ 4.0 = 0 3.0 � w w 2.8 L 1.8 y L L B.9 � Exhibit 7 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -C HOLE MONTES COMPLETION REPORT REPAIRS TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PUMP WATER TREATMENT PLANT NEAR COPELAND, MAY 2017 5 Pages Completion Report Repairs to Distribution System Pump Water Treatment Plant near Copeland City of Everglades City, Florida Ronald E. Benson, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Hole Montes, Inc. The City of Everglades City retained Florida Utility Solutions as the contractor to make repairs to one of the Distribution System Pumps which pump water from the Water Treatment Plant located north of Copeland to the City of Everglades City's drinking water customers, including pumping water to the Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station located on the north side of Everglades City. This project considerably increases the reliability of the City's drinking water system, as combined with the upgrades and repairs completed in April 2017 to the City's Booster Pump, there are parallel pumps which are fully operational at both facilities. The project consisted of making repairs necessary to one of the pumps which pump the treated water from the ground Storage Tank at the City of Everglades City's Water Treatment Plant. With the repairs made to this pump, the City now has both primary and secondary duty pumps, with the pumps alternating duty. The vertical turbine pump first had to be pulled from its can which is buried beneath the floor of the Water Treatment Plant building. This was an interesting chore as the multiple stage pump is nearly as tall as the roof of the building. Fortunately, with only a few inches to spare, the pump was raised using the portable hoist and then able to be lowered, laid flat and removed out the doors of the Water Treatment Plant. The pump, although considerably worn, was able to be rebuilt and reinstalled into the existing pump can below the floor of the building. Due to the age of the initial pump installation, some miscellaneous work was needed in order to reattach the pump to the floor and can below the floor. This required sanding/grinding and placement of epoxy to form a new surface for the pump to be attached with a water -tight seal. Satisfactory reinstallation was accomplished following this additional minor repair work, including use of a new thicker gasket. The rehabilitated pump was returned to service on Wednesday, May 10, 2017. Some photos of the reinstallation of the rebuilt pump are provided on the following pages PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -D HOLE MONTES COMPLETION REPORT UPGRADES AND REPAIRS POTABLE WATER PUMP STATION AT COPELAND AVENUE AND CAMELLIA STREET, MAY 2017 7 Pages 402 - Completion Report Upgrades and Repairs Potable Water Pump Station at Copeland Ave and Camellia Street City of Everglades City, Florida Ronald E. Benson, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Hole Montes, Inc. The City of Everglades City retained Florida Utility Solutions as the contractor to make upgrades and repairs to the Potable Water Pump Station located near intersection of Copeland Avenue and Camellia Street. This pump station pumps the water from the on-site storage tank to the City's customers in Everglades City and south of Everglades City. The project consisted of making repairs necessary to place two 25 horsepower pumps (300 gallons per minute) into service using new synchronized VFD drives in order to alternate pumps and to operate to maintain a discharge pressure setpoint. One of the pumps was rebuilt and paired with a new 25 HP motor. Pump and motor were reinstalled in a secure manner (previously the pump and motor had become unstable with respect to the concrete pump base and there was substantial vibration). In addition, pipe supports were placed on both the suction and discharge piping to assure alignment of pipe joints to repair leaks in the piping. The seals on a check valve were replaced, which along with the new pipe supports eliminated the leaking at the check valve. A second pump was serviced and placed back into service when the new VFD drives were connected to the two pumps. A new pressure transducer was installed and tied into the VFD controller. On Friday, April 21, 2017, 1 observed the two pumps in operation and both operated properly with no vibration. The flowmeter was observed and recorded an apparent flow of between 250 and 300 gallons per minute.t ' It is unknown as to when the flowmeter was last calibrated, but the flow was consistent with expectations for the pumps. New Pressure transducer on discharge pipe New pipe supports New motor and rebuilt pump with new manual read pressure gages New pipe supports and replacement of pipe section, second operational duty pump (with new VFD drive) is in the left of this photo and the new motor and rebuilt pump is in the bottom left in this photo PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -E FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION EMAIL, EVERGLADES CITY WATER SYSTEM DRAFT DRINKING WATER FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS AND ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN APRIL 25, 2017 130 Pages BOARD of DIRECTORS WILLIAM G. GRUBBS Tallahassee President TOM JACKSON Punta Gorda Vice President BRUCE MORRISON Destin Secretarylrreasurer ROBERTMUNRO Orlando National Director PATRICIA CICHON Monticello SCOTTKELLY West Palm Beach PAUL BRAYTON Harbour Heights EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GARY WILLIAMS Tallahassee EMAIL ftwa@frwa.net WEBSITE www.frwa.net FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 2970 WELLINGTON CIRCLE • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32309-7813 (850) 668-2746 Mayor Sammy Hamilton, Jr. Everglades City 102 North Copeland Ave. Everglades City, FL 34139 Phone: (239) 695-2511 Email: mayorhamilton@aol.com Re: Draft Drinking Water Fiscal Sustainability Analysis & Asset Management Plan — Everglades City Collier County, PWS ID# 5110089 Mayor Hamilton, The Florida Rural Water Association is pleased to submit the following Drinking Water System Fiscal Sustainability and Asset Management Plan (FSAMP) to the City of Everglades City. FRWA enjoys serving you and the City in partnership with the FDEP Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Program to identify your drinking water system's most urgent and critical needs. Please review the proposed FSAMP thoroughly. We look forward to receiving your comments and discussing your water utility assets' sustainability. We wish to finalize the report and present findings to the Council in a workshop or regular meeting for adoption and implementation. This report assesses the current conditions of your drinking water fixed capital assets (water treatment plant, transmission and distribution system) and more importantly provides recommendations, procedures, and tools to assist with long range asset protection and drinking water utility reinvestment. FRWA stands ready and available to support FSAMP recommendation and implementation. The following report is considered a living document with tools for your use and must be updated at least annually (recommended quarterly updates) by the City of Everglades City utility management. We provide electronic copies for your use and future modification. FRWA is available to assist in updating and revising the City's FSAMP. You are a valued FRWA member — the Utility Asset Management Division has the City of Callaway's best interests at heart and cares that your projects make the most effective and efficient use of limited resources! This tool is an unbiased, impartial, independent review and is solely intended for achievement of water system fiscal sustainability and maintaining your valuable water utility assets. Florida Rural Water Association has enjoyed serving you and wishes your water system the best. Sincerely, David Haring FRWA Utility Asset Management Copy: Shanin Speas-Frost, FDEP Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Gary Williams, FRWA Executive Director Jason Sparks, FRWA Utility Asset Management Asset Management Plan 11/03/2016 Everglades City Fiscal Sustainability and Asset Management Plan Prepared for: EVERGLADES CITY EVERGLADES CITY. FLORIDA PWS ID: 5110089 Prepared by: DAVID HARING and JASON SPARKS FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Date: 4/25/2017 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Contents Florida Rural Water Association Letter of Submission..............................................................................1 ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................................5 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................b 1.1 Mission Statement...............................................................................................................................6 1.2 Staff Information...................................................:.............................................................................. 6 Figure 1-1. Everglades City Public Works Organization Chart.................................................................8 Table 1-1. Everglades City Asset Management Team..............................................................................8 2 Utility Overview......................................................................................................................9 Table 2-1. Everglades City Utility Overview.............................................................................................. 9 3 Description of Current Assets and Needs..........................................................................10 4 Critical Assets......................................................................................................................13 Table 4-1. Everglades City Critical Asset Inventory ...............................................................................13 5 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Strategy......................................................................16 5.1 Preventive Maintenance....................................................................................................................16 Table 5-1. Everglades City Preventive Maintenance Schedule for 2016 ................................................17 5.2 Pro -active vs Reactive Maintenance.................................................................................................18 6 Water Quality........................................................................................................................19 Source Water Assessments and Protection............................................................................................19 6.1 Implementation Strategy to Protect Watersheds...............................................................................19 WaterQuality Monitoring Strategy..........................................................................................................19 Waterand Energy Efficiency...................................................................................................................19 BestManagement Practices (BMPs)......................................................................................................20 7 Capital Improvement Program(CIP)...................................................................................20 Table 7-1. Everglades City Capital Improvement Projects......................................................................21 8 Growth Projections and Financial Strategy.......................................................................27 9 Action Plan...........................................................................................................................29 Sustainable Practice: Energy Management..........................................................................34 Sustainable Practice: Water Efficiency.................................................................................49 Sustainable Practice: Climate Change.. ................................................................................ 50 RegionalPlanning...................................................................................................................50 Adoption..................................................................................................................................50 Implementation.......................................................................................................................50 9.1 Review Schedule ........................... ...................................................... ._.... ,..................................... 50 3 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 10 Appendices.........................................................................................................................51 Expenses for Everglades City Year: 2017............................................................................................... 74 Revenue for Everglades City Year: 2017................................................................................................75 WTP ASSETS O&M / PM Worksheets.................................................................................................... g3 AppendixE............................................................................................................................................107 Glossary.................................................................................................................................................107 AppendixF............................................................................................................................................111 2015 FDEP Sanitary Survey and Consumer Confidence Report .........................................................111 C! Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Executive Summary This Drinking Water System (DWS) Fiscal Sustainability and Asset Management Plan (FSAMP) is for Everglades City and describes how the utility will manage consecutive DWS infrastructure assets. Everglades City is an incorporated community that provides water service both within and beyond its corporate limits. The outlying unincorporated communities served by the City include Plantation Island and Seaboard Village in Copeland. These represent a demand of over 17 percent of Everglades City's system capacity. The Everglades City Utilities Department has a staff of 2 full-time employees who combine for 1 full-time equivalents (FTEs) and perform day- to-day functions to keep the Drinking Water System functioning properly. The City's WTP has a design capacity of 0.465 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) and on average supplies 0.240 MGD of water to a population of approximately 4,073 via 1,629 metered connections. Utility maps maintained by the utility are stored at City Hall located at: 102 North Copeland Ave. Everglades City, FL 34139 Level of Service It is the mission of Everglades City government to: I. Provide safe and reliable drinking water service while meeting regulatory requirements. 11. Budget improvement projects focused on assets critical to sustained performance based on sound operational and financial planning. III. Maintain realistic rates and adjust as necessary to ensure adequate revenue reserves for targeted asset improvement. IV. Ensure long-term drinking water system resilience and sustainability. V. Serve its citizens by providing an attractive and inviting quality of life for its residents and visitors. The Utility Division provides the public with clean and safe drinking water and ensures water for firefighting capabilities. Responsibilities include maintenance and repair of the Water Treatment Plant (WTP), Water Distribution System (WDS), as well as installation of new water infrastructure within Everglades City service area. There are very strict state and federal guidelines for producing safe drinking water. The City's water must meet or exceed all these requirements. The primary legislation governing drinking water quality is the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). To ensure the highest quality, the SDWA requires each public water utility to implement a regular program of sample collection and laboratory analysis. Contaminants that can cause acute health effects are monitored daily. Other contaminants are monitored weekly, and still others undergo monthly testing. Monitoring results are reported regularly to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which work together to see that all requirements are followed. Strict adherence to monitoring and testing are the best guarantee for safe drinking water. Source water from the two wells is aerated, disinfected and filtered prior to being pumped into the Water Distribution System. Sodium Hypochlorite and Ammonium Sulfate are added to source water at the WTP for disinfection; a minimum chlorine residual of 0.2 parts per million is maintained throughout the WDS to ensure water quality. Sodium Hydroxide and Sulfuric Acid are utilized for pH adjustment of the source water. Additionally, Spectra Guard scale inhibitor is Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 added for mineral scale prevention. The WTP employs two 5 micron pre -filter units and a dual train nano -filtration unit. Everglades City publishes a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) annually to inform the public of its water quality which is mailed to each customer. A copy can be obtained at City Hall or Public Works. Everglades City strives to keep its citizens informed of all local and regional projects and events that impact and/or involve its residents. Water conservation practices are not only recommended, but required by law. The SFWMD requires education of the public in conservation matters concerning water usage. 1 Introduction This FSAMP is for Everglades City and describes how the utility will manage DWS infrastructure assets. Customer service demands and regulations require utilities to actively manage drinking water and wastewater assets through careful maintenance, repair and replacement decisions. This plan is an effective tool for combining technical, management and financial practices to ensure the level of service required by the community is provided at the appropriate cost. This plan has the following purposes: 1. To demonstrate responsible management of drinking water assets 2. To communicate and justify funding requirements indicated by the plan 3. To provide a management roadmap for the utility 4. To serve as a link between Everglades City and its customers The FSAMP contains an overview of the utility, mission statement, level of service agreement, critical asset list, operation and maintenance strategy, capital investment program, and financial strateg ies. 1.1 Mission Statement The mission statement defines the goals of Everglades City and is the guide for level of service agreements discussed in section 3. Everglades City mission statement is as follows: "We commit to improving and maintaining public health, the protection and performance of our drinking water treatment facility, pressure booster station and transmission/distribution utility assets, while minimizing the long-term cost of operating those assets. We strive to make the most cost-effective renewal and replacement investments and provide the highest -quality customer service possible." 1.2 Staff Information Everglades City government is comprised of a five -member City Commission, including the mayor and five city councilmembers: Mayor Sammy Hamilton City Council Parker Oglesby City Council McBeth J. Collins City Council Johnnie Potter City Council Elaine Middelstaedt City Council Howell Grimm Jr. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 The Mayor advises the Commission on strategic direction for the City and responds to changing community needs. The Mayor recommends to the City Council adoption of policies the Mayor believes will benefit the health, safety, and welfare of the community. City Clerk — Dottie Joiner Water Billing Clerk — Lisa Marteeny The City Clerk with the assistance of the Secretary is responsible for keeping an accurate account of all taxes and assessments and all monies due to, and all receipts and disbursements by the municipality; and keeps an accurate account of all City assets and liabilities and of all appropriations made by the City Commission. The Commission possesses powers as provided in the City Charter to pass ordinances, adopt resolutions and to exercise all other powers provided or otherwise accepted. City Attorney — Leo J. Salvatori - Salvatori, Wood, Buckel, Carmichael & Lottes The City Attorney represents the City, its agencies, boards, commissions, authorities, officers and employees in all matters relating to their official duties as directed by the City Council. Everglades City Public Works Water Department consists of two employees who share duties related to Drinking Water, Wastewater, Storm Water, Streets and Parks and Recreation. • City Supervisor— Lloyd Beatty • City Foreman — Gordon Forbes Everglades City Water Department 2 employee staff performs day-to-day functions to enable a properly functioning utility. Both individuals volunteered as members of the "the asset management team." The Mayor and his appointees perform asset management planning responsibilities. The team is responsible for preparing, implementing, and updating this plan. To the extent that other staff such as the City Clerk, Water Billing Clerk and City Council members are involved with this or other projects, the asset management team is responsible for coordinating such involvement in FSAMP adoption, ongoing development and implementation. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Figure 1-1. Everglades City Public Works Organization Chart EVERGLADES CITY ORGANIZATIONAL CHAR; Table 1-1. Everglades City Asset Management Team Organization Role I Responsibility on Project Facility Manager Sammy Hamilton Mayor Everglades City Dottie Joiner City Clerk Everglades City Operations Manager Lloyd Beatty City Supervisor Everglades City Field Manager and Maintenance Gordon Forbes City Foreman Everglades City Maintenance Stan Epperly Drinking Water Circuit Rider Florida Rural Water Assoc. Technical Assistance David Haring Asset Management Florida Rural Water Assoc. Technical Assistance Jason Sparks Asset Management Florida Rural Water Assoc, I Technical Assistance H Everglades City Asset Management Plan 2 Utility Overview 4/25/2017 The following table demonstrates key statistics about the utility and the population is serves. Table 2-1. Everglades City Utility Overview The City's Average Daily Demand is 0.240 MGD. This allows for a 0.760 MG storage surplus in the foreseeable future. Population declined 14.9% between the years 2000 and 2014. (Source: hftp://www.city-data.com/city/Everglades-Florida.htmi). Given this, the City should not explore the development of new water supply sources in preparation for population increase. It is recommended the City remain engaged with FRWA and consultants to prepare for future DWS needs. DescriptionUnit WATER SUPPLY Water Supply Connection • Customer Breakdown 3/<" meters connected to potable water No. 1;620 1" meters connected to potable water No. 1 1'W" meters connected to potable water No. 0 2" meters connected to potable water No. 3 3" meters connected to potable water No. 2 4" meters connected to potable water No. 0 6" meters connected to potable water No. 1 8" meters connected to potable water No. 2 The Drinking Water Network High Service Pumps Number 2 Jockey Pumps Number 2 Concrete & Metal Storage Tanks Storage Capacity Days 1.0 MG 2 Distribution Mains Linear Feet 146,528 it Valves Number 61 Hydrants Number 101 Automatic Flushing Devices Number 7 Backflow Prevention Device Number 13 General Water Supply Information Number of connections No. 1,629 Storage Capacity MG 1.0 Reserve Storage Days 2 How Sourced Description Two 8" Wells drilled 37' into Surficial Aquifer Design Capacity Gallons/Day 465,000 Average Daily Consumption Gallons/Day 240,000 Water Supply Asset Values Replacement Value $ U.S. Dollars $13,812,689 The City's Average Daily Demand is 0.240 MGD. This allows for a 0.760 MG storage surplus in the foreseeable future. Population declined 14.9% between the years 2000 and 2014. (Source: hftp://www.city-data.com/city/Everglades-Florida.htmi). Given this, the City should not explore the development of new water supply sources in preparation for population increase. It is recommended the City remain engaged with FRWA and consultants to prepare for future DWS needs. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 3 Description of Current Assets and Needs The goal of Everglades City is to deliver safe water by providing services that meet or exceed customer expectations and comply with federal regulations. The levels of service determine the amount of funding that is required to maintain, renew and upgrade the water infrastructure to provide customers with the levels of service specified. The Level of Service (LOS) goals are defined across the four service areas identified below and a performance target is defined for each goal as a measure for the Level of Service goal. Changes to the levels of service goals and how the utility addresses the issues will affect funding requirements and how well the utility can provide proper service to the community. Florida Rural Water Association (FRWA) staff, in cooperation with Everglades City Public Works staff, completed a field survey of the City's critical water assets. The intent of the survey was to inspect a "cross-sectional" sampling of the City's assets to determine overall condition and to identify capital improvement needs as well as operations & maintenance needs. FRWA congratulates the City's current water department staff for their hard work to maintain and improve the system. The current staff is committed to operational excellence and is continually seeking and implementing solutions to several challenging areas. FRWA is committed to helping them achieve these goals through this plan. Sources Everglades City pumps water from the Surficial Aquifer utilizing two 8" wells with submersible pumps located at the Water Treatment Plant on Jane's Scenic Drive in Copeland, approximately 6 miles from the city limits of Everglades City and 7 miles from the Water Booster Station, The Booster Station is located at the intersection of Camelia St. and Begonia St. in Everglades City. Distribution Svstem The WDS is a major component of any water system — typically 2/3 the value of the whole system. It is also the least visible asset and as such, is most likely to be neglected - operated to the point of failure. The majority of the City's water distribution system was constructed in the early 1980's. Water pipes currently range in age from the 1930's (over 80 years old) to 2014. Pipe materials include asbestos cement and PVC. PVC is the most common material in the system. The majority of the distribution system is made up of 6 -inch PVC pipe, however there are mains ranging in sizes from 1 -inch to 8 -inch. The longest recorded run of 4" asbestos cement pipe, installed in the 1930's, is 1,075 ft. Pipe condition is generally good in most areas, with few breaks caused by material failure. However, the majority of distribution piping is nearing its expected useful life. The water system services areas both within and outside City limits. Much of the distribution system is condensed within the City limits, however there are long segments of water main that run to the east along Plantation Parkway serving Plantation Island and south along C.R. 29 (Copeland Ave) feeding the island of Chokoloskee. In addition to water mains, the City has (as of last count) 106 fire hydrants, 61 shutoff valves, and 1,629 billing water meters. There also exists 7 automatic flushing valves expunging dead ends, checked for functionality approximately every 1-2 months. Further information about hydrant and valve condition is provided on the following pages. 10 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 The City does not currently have a geographic information systems (GIS) program in place, however, progress is being made towards implementing GIS to assist in both asset management and CMMS. To date, visible components such as fire hydrants, flush stands and valves have been GPS marked. The distribution water lines are based on employee memories and As-Builts which are known to have errors, but are still useful. Piping Needs Everglades City maintains 27.75 miles of PVC and Ductile Iron Pipe. There is approximately 1,100 ft of 4" pipe in the area West of Copeland Avenue and South of Jasmine Street which is questioned to be Asbestos Cement pipe installed in the 1930's. It is recommended to research this area and replace any A.C. pipe located. Fire Hvdrant Needs Everglades City possesses 101 fire hydrants. The fire department performs regular flow testing, exercising, and maintenance on all fire hydrants. An isolation valve is installed for each hydrant. It allows hydrant pressure relief to facilitate maintenance and repair or replacement of the hydrant without shutting down the water main, thereby interrupting service to many customers. Additionally, lacking isolation is a safety failure. In frequent scenarios cars, tractors, equipment, etc. damage fire hydrants which may cause a major rupture, especially in those without internal isolation protection or when anchoring elbow mechanical joint separation from pipe occurs. Not being able to quickly depressurize the hydrant at the isolation valve can result in major road washout, localized flooding, loss of water pressure throughout large areas of the city, etc. Each hydrant should be accompanied by an isolation valve and all isolation valves should be exercised regularly as part of a valve exercising program. Of serious concern is that at least 7 of the fire hydrants on record the fire department has indicated to be either missing or out of service. This represents a real liability threat and potential for injury lawsuits against the City. These fire hydrants should be immediately repaired or replaced. Valve Needs The City possesses 61 isolation valves within its distribution system. The City does not currently have a regular valve exercising program in place. A valve exercising plan should be implemented to ensure valves function properly, especially in an emergency. The City can purchase a hand held or trailer mounted valve exercising machine to assist in turning valve op nuts/valve stems. Valves are recommended to be exercised on an annual or biannual basis. Not only will this ensure they operate properly, it will also increase their longevity, and identify malfunctioning DWS valves. Water Quality Needs Everglades City water system continues to perform well in the area of water quality since the construction of the new WTP treatment processes in 2013. Although the water system failed to perform monitoring for Nitrates and Nitrites as well as the Volatile Organic Compounds Group during the 2016 calendar year, it did collect samples for these parameters in January of 2017. Laboratory analyses results indicated that all contaminants met drinking water standards. 11 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Booster Pump Station and Ground Storage Tank The City possesses a pumping station consisting of 2 High Service Pumps, 2 Jockey Pumps, and 1 diesel driven Emergency Fire Service pump with a 0.500 million gallon capacity Ground Storage Tank (GST). The HSP station and GST were constructed in 1979. There are 2 centrifugal high service pumps — 1 rated at 30 HP/400 GPM and 1 rated at 25 HP/325 GPM. These HSP's are designed to provide the bulk of WDS water pressure and be used alternately. At present, only 1 HSP is operational and is running continuously. There are also 2 Jockey Pumps, both rated at 10HP/175GPM. These serve to assist the HSP in maintaining pressure within the system. Neither of these pumps are currently operational. Additionally, there are two 1.5HP/100GPM recirculation pumps which serve to reduce stagnant water within the GST. Neither of these pumps are currently functional. It is unknown if the non -operational pump issues are due to mechanical failure, electrical failure, or operational failure. FRWA recommends having a qualified electrician make the initial assessment of the ability to return these vital pieces of equipment back into service. Other major components of the hydraulic system include large diameter piping, check valves, pressure regulating valves and a master flowmeter. The pre -stressed concrete GST has a storage capacity of 0.500 MG. The City is keeping up with routine 5 -year GST inspections. The most recent inspection was performed by Liquid Engineering Corporation, January 2015. The inspection was performed under the review of a FL licensed professional engineer and consisted of a visual analysis of the structural integrity of the tank walls, dome, floor, and accessories in accordance with AWWA D110 and ACI 350 standards. Issues noted were minor in nature and not affecting the structure of the tank. They consisted of: • Absence of vent security shrouds. This could potentially allow for the intentional introduction of hazardous chemical or biological contaminants. • No lock -out mechanism on the external ladder. This could potentially allow vandals easy access to the tank. • Light cracking and efflorescence present on the roof slab, floor slab and walls. However, no structural damage or leaking was observed. FRWA recommends re - coating the exterior of the tank to help prevent further deterioration. • Corrosion evident on the access manway and 6" drain. Both 8" inlet pipe and the single 8" outlet pipe were observed to be significantly corroded, but operating as designed with no leaks. Manway, drain, inlet and outlet structures should be properly primed and painted to prevent further deterioration. There is a pump building on the premises where all pumps and electrical components are housed. The booster station control panel is located here, also the fire protection panel, main breakers, surge protectors and emergency backup power generator automatic transfer switch. These components appear to be in poor condition and require a complete overhaul or replacement in order to function well. A central heating and air conditioning system may be considered to keep the electronics cool and dehumidified — key to maintaining the life of these components. Everglades City is currently using "Aquatrol" as their SCADA system provider at the Booster Pump Station. A high value is placed on SCADA system security and the system should be equipped with strong encryption capabilities and other security features. A vulnerable SCADA system is dangerous to public health, safety and utility operations. Cyber -attacks can severely cripple a utility and interrupt the regular supply of water the community relies heavily upon. 12 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Staffin 4/25/2017 Everglades City is classified as a Category 2 Class C potable water system. Therefore, the system is required to staff licensed Class C system operators. Currently there are 2 contracted licensed operators, with C license levels. Additionally, the City employs 2 distribution personnel. 4 Critical Assets Some assets are more important than others in making sure that customers receive safe drinking water. Therefore, the asset management team used the CUPSS software (developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) to identify and prioritize critical assets and to improve practices used for routine operation and maintenance. This process includes reviewing all assets and recording their conditions (likelihood of failure), criticality to the utility (consequence of failure) and redundancy (the number of back-up assets to help support each asset). This ensures the utility delivers the level of service described in the previous section. Everglades City asset management team completed the critical asset assessment. Table 4-1 lists assets critical to maintain utility performance. Table 4-1. Everglades City Critical Asset Inventory 13 Redundancy Crit _ on R1s Life Medium Risk— AMMONIUM SULFATE FEED Aggressive TOTE 17 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive SULFURIC ACID FEED DRUM 17 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive ANTI-SCALANT FEED TOTE 17 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FEED Aggressive DRUM 17 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring High Risk— Immediate HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1 -1s-yrs 50% Major Poor Attention High Risk — Immediate HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1 MOTOR -15-yrs 50% Major Poor Attention High Risk— Immediate HIGH SERVICE PUMP#2 -15-yrs 50% Major Poor Attention High Risk — Immediate HIGH SERVICE PUMP #2 MOTOR -15-yrs 50% Major Poor Attention Medium Risk— Aggressive WTP GENERATOR 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive WTP GENERATOR FUEL TANK 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring 13 Everglades City Asset Management Plan ensnn17 14 Hing Criticality Cond('t�t5 Redundancy Risk o Medium Risk — WTP GENERATOR TRANSFER Aggressive SWITCH 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive AMMONIUM SULFATE SKID 17 -yrs 100% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk — Aggressive SULFURIC ACID SKID 17 -yrs 100% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk — Aggressive ANTI-SCALANT SKID 17 -yrs 100% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SKID 17 -yrs 100% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive WELL 6 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 17 -yrs 50% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive WELL 7 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 17 -yrs 50% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk — COPELAND GROUND STORAGE Aggressive TANK 15 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk — Aggressive R.O. SKID 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk — Aggressive MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive BREAKER PANEL 27 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring k— te DIESEL PUMP ENGINE (hsp) -18-yrs 50% Major 7Gc=.dAttention High Risk— Immediate DIESEL PUMP PUMP (hsp) -18-yrs 50% Major Good Attention High Risk— Immediate DIESEL PUMP BATTERIES (2) -33-yrs 0% Major Good Attention Medium Risk— Aggressive GROUND STORAGE TANK 12 -yrs 0% Major Good Monitoring High Risk— Immediate AMMONIUM SULFATE INJECTOR -18-yrs 0% Major Good Attention High Risk— SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE Immediate INJECTOR -18-yrs 0% Major Good Attention High Risk— FIRE PRESSURE SENSOR Immediate TRANSMITTER -18-yrs 0% Major Very Poor Attention EFFLUENTMETER 8 -yrs 0% Major Good High Risk 14 412 512 01 7 �........... .... ......... ......... ........ .._. Criticality _ Conn' nda:nc, 11 High Risk— Immediate EFFLUENT SAMPLE TAP 12 -yrs 0% Major Good Attention High Risk — MASTER FIRE PUMP CONTROL Immediate PANEL -8-yrs 0% Major Very Poor Attention High Risk— Immediate BREAKER PANEL BOX -8-yrs 0% Major Good Attention High Risk— MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH Immediate (TRANSFORMER) -8-yrs 0% Major Good Attention High Risk— Immediate TRANSFORMER -8-yrs 0% Major Poor Attention High Risk— Immediate CL2 DRUM 3 -yrs 0% Major Fair Attention Medium Risk— Aggressive GENERATOR 22 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH 22 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive PROPANETANK 22 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring Medium Risk— Aggressive GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH 22 -yrs 0% Major Fair Monitoring 15 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 5 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Strategy O&M consists of preventive and emergency/reactive maintenance. In this section, the O&M strategy varies by the asset, criticality, condition and operating history. In addition, the maintenance program addresses the level of service performance objectives to ensure the utility is running at a level acceptable to the customer. Unexpected incidents can require changing the maintenance schedule for some assets. This is because corrective action must be taken in response to unexpected incidents, including those found during routine inspections and O&M activities. Utility staff will record condition assessments 1) When maintenance is performed 2) At established intervals or 3) During scheduled inspections. Assets rated at the top of the priority ranking are presented below with corresponding maintenance strategies. As an asset is repaired, rehabilitated or replaced, its condition will improve and potentially reduces the overall risk of asset failure. The maintenance strategy will be revisited every 6 months. 5.1 Preventive Maintenance Preventive maintenance is the day-to-day work necessary to keep assets operating properly, which includes the following: 1. Regular and ongoing annual tasks necessary to keep the assets at their required service level. 2. Day-to-day and general upkeep designed to keep the assets operating at the required levels of service. 3. Tasks that provide for the normal care and attention of the asset including repairs and minor replacements. Preventive maintenance is carried out as result of a planned maintenance program (such as regularly scheduled asset repairs) and historically problematic operations (such as blockages and root infestation). Equipment must be maintained according to manufacturer's recommendations to achieve maximum return on investment. By simply following the manufacturer's suggested preventive maintenance the useful life of equipment can be increased 2 to 3 times when compared to run till failure. Communities that have eliminated preventive maintenance practices from their operating budget can achieve positive returns from a relatively small additional investment. Table 5-1 shows preventive maintenance ideals based on best management practices and manufacturer's recommended servicing intervals. Deferred maintenance tasks that have not historically been performed because of inadequate funding or staffing must be projected into future operating budgets to achieve life expectancy projected by the manufacturer or engineer. 16 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Table 5-1. Everglades City Preventive Maintenance Schedule for 2016 4/25/2017 17 Once per day Inspect chlorine and fluoride testing Once per day Check and record chlorine residual at the point of application. equipment. Check and record chlorine residual in Once per day Inspect heater operation during winter Every 1 week(s) on the distribution system. months. Monday Check and record water levels in Once per day Investigate customer complaints. Once per day storage tanks. Check on-site readings against lab The 1st Monday every 1 Lubricate locks. The 1st Monday every 1 results. month(s) month(s) Check water meter readings and Once per day Make sure unnecessary equipment is The 1st Monday of record water production. properly decommissioned. September Clean pump house and grounds. Every 1 week(s) on Operate all valves inside the The 9 at Monday of Make sure fire hydrants are Monday treatment plant and pump house. January accessible. Maintain log continuously throughout the year. Complete a daily security check. Once per day Overhaul chemical feed pumps (O The 1st Monday of * Check all windows, doors, hatches, rings, check valves, and diaphragms). July seals and vents for evidence of vandalism or tampering. * Check all well caps, seals, and vents to ensure that they are intact and sealed. * Check allsecurity lighting to ensure proper operation. Conduct weekly security check. Every 1 week(s) on Read all customer meters and compare The 1st Monday every 1 * Inspect all pump house plumbing Monday againsttotal water produced forthe month. month(s) for leaks. * Check all sump pumps for proper operation. * Check all station alarms. * Check backup power source to ensure it will operate when needed. * Inspect fencing and gates. Confirm submittal of monthly reports. The tat Monday every 1 Read electric meter at pump house and. The 1st Monday every 1 months) record. Take appropriate monthly water quality month(s) Exercise half of mainline valves in The 1st Monday of The .1st Monday every 1 March and half in September. March and September samples. month(s) Inspect booster pump stations. Once per day Update My CUPSS plan Annually 17 Everglades city Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 The 1st Monday of Prepare demand forecast. Identify Perform preventive maintenance on treatment plant and pump June and evaluate energy conservation house buildings. measures (for your utility). Identify and evaluate distribution system The 1st Monday of leaks. Establish/update water loss July mitigation program. Establish/update customer incentive program for water - efficient home devices. *Additional cost necessary to fully implement the above described maintenance program must be budgeted into the annual operating budget in order to achieve the manufacturer's recommended life expectancy and highest return on investment. Often the greatest obstacle to improved maintenance is staffing. Labor shortages must be addressed before an improved preventive maintenance plan can be implemented. 5.2 Pro -active vs Reactive Maintenance Reactive maintenance is often carried out because of customer requests or sudden asset failures. The required service and maintenance to fix the customers issue(s) is identified by staff inspection. Examples of pro -active asset management practices currently in place: Fire hydrants flow -tested every 5 years Automatic flushing devices constructed in-house The Town currently approaches asset management in a reactive manner as follows: The City Clerk receives phone call, creates hand written work order and assigns to appropriate personnel. Field personnel responds and resolves call. City Clerk files resolved handwritten work order in filing cabinet. Upon adoption of this Asset Management Plan or any DEP-approved DW AMP, FRWA Utility Asset Management (UAM) intends to create and install "Diamond Maps", a GIS -centric software, and upload Everglades City's asset data definition file. The City Clerk and Field Personnel will be trained on Diamond Maps functionality and immediately begin using it for scheduling and tracking DWS asset routine and preventive maintenance. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 412 512 01 7 6 Water Quality This section addresses how Everglades City addresses water quality and water efficiency issues under the two major federal statutes governing water, which are the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and at the state level, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Drinking Water Regulations. Source Water Assessments and Protection The cost of water treatment, as well as the risks to public health, can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination. Everglades City is advised to conduct a source water assessment and protection plan that provides information about the drinking water in Everglades City and the community. The study results show what actions the utility should take to help reduce potential sources of contamination and protect drinking water. FRWA is willing to provide cost-free assistance in helping to create a Groundwater/Sourcewater Protection Plan, if requested. 6.1 Implementation Strategy to Protect Watersheds Water Quality Monitoring Strategy Water quality monitoring provides the data to characterize waters and identify changes or trends in water quality over time. The collection of monitoring data enables Everglades City to identify existing or emerging water quality problems and determine whether current pollution control mechanisms are effective in complying with the regulations. The monitoring assets are included in Section 2.0 Utility Overview and tasks associated with water quality monitoring are included in Section 5.1. Water and Energy Efficiency The water and energy sectors are highly interdependent. An enormous amount of energy is consumed when withdrawing, treating and distributing water. Identifying approaches to integrate energy efficient practices into daily management and utility long-term planning also contribute to long-term sustainability of water infrastructure by reducing operation costs and adding to a utility's bottom line. Everglades City is initiating the following steps to encourage water and energy efficiency to aid in forestalling future large capital expenditures in infrastructure and have identified several water and energy efficient capital improvement projects: - Securing adequate, dependable storage; - Purchasing efficient pumps and motors; - Properly sizing equipment to its intended duty/load requirement; - Installing renewable energy technologies on-site or purchasing renewable energy credits; - Using variable speed devices; - Water audits and water loss control programs; - Considering how the utility handles heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and lighting; - Conducting a baseline energy evaluation to assess the utility's energy consumption status; - Sustainable pricing and - Employing consumer outreach programs. 19 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Best Management Practices (BMPs) Adopting BMPs is an emerging trend among the water utility industry. Widespread adoption of better management practices offers great promise to reduce costs and direct system investments using a risk-based approach. BMPs are inherently pollution prevention practices. The asset management team currently employs and continues to consider additional BMPs. 7 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Everglades City Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the description of future capital projects. Capital improvement projects generally create a new asset that previously did not exist or an upgrade and improvement to an existing component's capacity. The projects can result from growth or environmental needs, such as the following: 1. Expenditure that purchases or creates a new asset or in any way improves an asset beyond its original design capacity. 2. Upgrades that increase asset capacity. 3. Construction designed to produce an improvement in asset standard operation beyond its present capacity. In addition to capital improvement projects, the asset management team has reviewed and is establishing a renewal (or rehabilitation) strategy. Renewal expenditure is anything that does not increase the asset's design capacity but restores an existing asset to its original capacity. Any improvement projects that require more than simply restoring an asset to its original capacity are deemed to be a renewal project, such as the following: 1. Activities that do not increase the capacity of the asset (i.e., upgrade and enhance the assets restoring them to their original size, condition and capacity) 2. Rehabilitation involving improvements and realignment or restores the assets to a new or fresh condition In making renewal decisions, the utility considered several categories other than the normally recognized physical, failure or breakage. Such renewal decisions include the following: 1. Structural 2. Capacity 3. Level of service failures 4. Outdated functionality 5. Cost or economic impact The utility staff and management know of potential assets that need to be repaired or rehabilitated. Reminders in the Diamond Maps task calendar let the staff members know when the condition of an asset begins to decline according to the manufacturer's life cycle recommendations of assets. The CUPSS Check Up Report also has provided recommendations (replace, repair, or rehabilitate) for each asset. The utility staff members have taken these reminders and recommendations into account. A summary of the current plan is presented in Table 7-1. Because the expected needs of the Utility will change each year, the CIP plan is updated annually to reflect those changes. Greater detail is presented in the City CIPP. 20 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Table 7-1. Everglades City Capital Improvement Projects 4/25/2017 21 -yamuntil Annual Capital Improvement Project AMMONIUM SULFATE FEED TOTE Total Cost Replacement/ Rehabilitation 17 Savings Required $6 SULFURIC ACID FEED DRUM 17 $6 ANTI-SCALANT FEED TOTE 17 $6 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FEED DRUM F$500 17 $6 5 FT MOBILE STAIRS (GRAY) 27 $19 7 FT MOBILE STAIRS (YELLOW) 27 $19 BLUE STORAGE CABINET $500 27 $19 YELLOW STORAGE CABINET $500 27 $19 PALLET JACK $500 27 $19 OLD WELL PUMP $2,500 1 $2,500 HSP METER $3,000 1 $3,000 HSP PRESSURE GAUGE $10 1 $10 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1 $5,000 1 $5,000 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1MOTOR $1,500 1 $1,500 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #2 $5,000 1 $5,000 HIGH SERVICE PUMP 92 MOTOR $1,500 1 $1,500 HSP #1 CHECK VALVE $3,500 15 $233 HSP #1 ISOLATION VALVE $800 15 $53 HSP FILTERBYPASS BUTTERFLY VALVE 1 $1,000 15 $67 HSP FILTER BYPASS BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 $1,000 15 $67 FILTER HOUSING IA $3,000 1 $3,000 FILTER HOUSING IB $3,000 1 $3,000 FILTER HOUSING 2A $3,000 1 $3,000 FILTER HOUSING 2B $3,000 1 $3,000 FILTER INLETPSI GAUGEIA $10 1 $10 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 1A $10 1 $10 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 1B $10 1 $10 FILTEROUFLET PSI GAUGE IB $10 1 $10 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 2A $10 1 $10 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 2A $10 1 $10 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 2B $10 1 $10 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 2B $10 1 $10 FILTER GATE VALVE #1 $800 15 $53 FILTER GATE VALVE #2 $800 15 $53 FILTER GATE VALVE #3 $800 15 $53 FILTER GATE VALVE #4 $800 15 $53 FILTER GATE VALVE 95 $800 15 $53 FILTER EFFLUENT METER $3,000 15 $200 EMERGENCY EYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #1 $750 17 $44 21 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Capital Improvement ProjectYear EMERGENCY EYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #2 $750 until Rehabilitation 17 Annuall Required $44 EMERGENCYEYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #3 $750 17 $44 PSION/OFF MERCURY SWITCH $100 17 $6 PS 2 LOW PSI SWITCH $100 17 $6 HSP 1 FILTER EFFLUENT VALVE $800 47 $17 HSP 2 FILTER EFFLUENT VALVE $800 47 $17 CENTURY LINK MODEM $200 7 $29 FORTI WIFI 30D $200 7 $29 WTP GENERATOR $35,000 27 $1,296 WTP GENERATOR FUEL TANK $3,000 27 $111 WTP GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH $15,000 27 $556 2" WTP RPZ BACKFLOW $500 47 $11 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE DRUM $100 17 $6 FRONT EXHAUST FAN $500 17 $29 REAR EXHAUST FAN $500 17 $29 CEILING FAN (BIG ONE) $500 17 $29 MOTORIZED PALLET JACK $5,000 17 $294 CRAFTSMAN ROLLAWAY TOOLBOX $1,000 47 $21 FACE SHIELD $100 17 $6 RUBBER GLOVES $100 2 $50 RUBBER COVERALLS $100 2 $50 RUBBERBOOTS $100 2 $50 114,3/8,1/2" CRAFTSMAN SOCKET SET $300 27 $11 3/4" CRAFTSMAN SOCKET SET $300 27 $11 1/2" IMPACT WRENCH $100 7 $14 HAMMERDRILL $100 7 $14 SAWZALL $100 7 $14 CHEMICAL FEED SPARE PARTS $100 17 $6 SPARE PULSAFEEDER CHEM PUMPS $500 17 $29 SPARE FILTER ELEMENTS $500 2 $250 SPARE GENERATOR FILTERS $100 2 $50 SPARE HIGH SERVICE PUMP $5,000 17 $294 50 GAL WATER HEATER $500 17 $29 WTP A/C UNIT $5,000 17 $294 WTP A/C AIR HANDLER $5,000 17 $294 AMMONIUM SULFATE SKID $20,000 17 $1,176 SULFURIC ACID SKID $20,000 17 $1,176 ANTI-SCALANT SKID $20,000 17 $1,176 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SKID $20,000 17 $1,176 WTP CHAINLINK FENCE $20,000 47 $426 WELL 6 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP $4,000 17 $235 3/25/2017 22 Fvarniades City A,�eet Management Plan 4/25/2017 23 Year until Annual Capital Improvement Project WELL 6 FLOW METER Tota I Cost Replacementl Rehabilitation $6,000 17 Savings Required $353 WELL 6 METER BYPASS $4,000 17 $235 WELL 6 CHAINLINK FENCE $1,000 47 $21 WELL 6 SECURITY LIGHT $500 17 $29 WELL 7 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP $4,000 17 $235 WELL 7 FLOW METER $6,000 17 $353 WELL 7 METER BYPASS $4,000 17 $235 WELL 7 CHAINLINK FENCE $1,000 47 $21 WELL 7 SECURITY LIGHT $500 17 $29 COPELAND GROUND STORAGE TANK $2,500,000 15 $166,667 R.O. SKID $2,500,000 27 $92,593 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER $100,000 27 $3,704 BREAKERPANEL $10,000 27 $370 PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE $4,000 1 $4,000 OCV GATE VALVE 1 $1,000 12 $83 OCV GATE VALVE 2 $1,000 12 $83 OCV PRESSURE GAUGE $10 1 $10 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (influent) $250 1 $250 DIESEL PUMP ENGINE (hsp) $20.,000 1 $20,000 DIESEL PUMP PUMP (hsp) $20,000 1 $20,000 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 1 $800 12 $67 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 $800 12 $67 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 3 (diesel pump) $800 12 $67 8" CHECK VALVE (diesel pump) $4,000 12 $333 EFFLUENT FLOW TRANSMITTER $250 1 $250 DIESEL PUMP BATTERIES (2) $250 1 $250 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (effluent) 250 1 $250 EFFLUENT PRESSURE GAUGE $10 1 $10 EFFLUENT PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE $4,000 12 $333 6" BUTTERFLY VALVE (@ pressure control valve) $800 12 $67 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER GATE VALVE I $50 12 $4 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATERGATE VALVE 2 $50 12 $4 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER CHECK VALVE $50 12 $4 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER AIR RELIEF VALVE $100 12 $8 GROUND STORAGE TANK $3,000,000 12 $250,000 HSP 1 INFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 BSP I PUMP $20,000 1 $20,000 HSP 1 MOTOR $10,000 1 $10,000 HSP 1 AIR RELIEF VALVE $100 12 $8 23 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/2.9/2017 Capital Improvement Project HSP EFFLUENT GATE VALVE Total Cost $800 Replacement/Year until Rehabilitation 12 Annual Required $87 HSP 1 CHECK VALVE $3,500 12 $292 HSP 2 INFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE $800 12 $67 HSP 2 INLET PSI GAUGE $10 1 $10 HSP 2 OUTLET PSI GAUGE $10 1 $10 HSP 2 PUMP $20,000 1 $20,000 HSP 2MOTOR $10,000 1 $10,000 HSP2 CHECK VALVE $3.,500 12 $292 HSP 2 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE $800 12 $87 HSP 1&1 EFFLUENT VALVE $1,000 12 $83 AMMONIUM SULFATE INJECTOR $500 1 $500 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INJECTOR $500 1 $500 JOCKEY PUMP 2 BUTTERFLY VALVE $800 12 $67 JOCKEY PUMP 2INFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP 2 PUMP $5,000 1 $5,000 JOCKEY PUMP 2 MOTOR $2,000 1 $2,000 JOCKEY PUNT 2PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE $100 12 $8 JOCKEY PUMP 2 CHECK VALVE $2,500 12 $208 JOCKEY PUMP 2 EFFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP INFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP IPUMP $5,000 1 $5,000 JOCKEY PUMP I MOTOR $2,000 1 $2,000 JOCKEY PUMP I PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE $100 12 $6 JOCKEY PUMP 1 CHECK VALVE $2,500 15 $167 JOCKEY PUMP 1 INFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP 1 EFFLUENT GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP OUTLETGATE VALVE $600 12 $50 JOCKEY PUMP FLOW METER (BOTH) $2,000 1 $2,000 RECIRCULATION PUMP INLET BUTTERFLY VALVE (BOTH) $800 12 $67 RECIRCULATION PUMP I INLET GATE VALVE $500 12 $42 RECIRCULATION PUMP IPUMP $5,000 1 $5,000 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 MOTOR $2,000 1 $2,000 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 CHECK VALVE $600 12 $50 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 OUTLET GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 INLET GATE VALVE $500 12 $42 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 PUMP $5,000 12 $417 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2MOTOR $2,000 12 $167 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 CHECK VALVE $600 12 $50 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 OUTLET GATE VALVE $600 12 $50 24 Fvernladea Citv Asset Manaaement Plan 4/25/2017 I Year until Annual Capital Improvement Project Rehabilitation Required RECIRCULATION PUMP PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE (BOTH) $100 12 $8 RECIRCULATION PUMP OUTLET GATE VALVE (BOTH) $600 12 $50 PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE $1,500 12 $125 PRESSURE CON 'RAOLLIN ET BUTTERFLY $600 12 $50 PRESSURE CONTROL OUTLET BUTTERFLY VALVE $600 12 $50 FIRE PRESSURE SENSOR TRANSMITTER $500 1 $500 EMERGENCY EYEWASH/SHOWER $750 1 $750 EFFLUENT METER INLET GATE VALVE $1,000 43 $23 EFFLUENT METERBYPASS GATE VALVE $1,000 43 $23 EFFLUENT METER $8,000 8 $1,000 EFFLUENT METER OUTLET GATE VALVE $1,000 43 $23 EFFLUENT SAMPLE TAP $100 12 $8 MASTERFIRE PUMP CONTROL PANEL $20,000 1 $20,000 PANELVIEW 600 $3,000 3 $1,000 HSP HOA SWITCHES $100. 1 $100 IF HOA SWITCHES $100 1 $100 RP HOA SWITCHES $100 1 $100 ANALOG FLOW METER $2,000 1 $2,000 FLOW CHART RECORDER $2,000 1 $2,000 24 HR CHART RECORDER $2,000 1 $2,000 BREAKER PANEL BOX $5,000 1 $5,000 MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH (TRANSFORMER) $5.,000 1 $5,000 TRANSFORMER $1,000 1 $1,000 AUTO -DIALER (P MSSURE) $1,500 13 $115 CL2/PH AUTO -SAMPLER $2,500 3 $833 CL2 PUMP 1 $500 3 $167 CL2 PUMP 2 $500 3 $167 N 13 PUMP 1 $500 3 $167 FLOW TOTALIZER/SIGNAL GENERATOR $300 3 $100 CL2 ROOM FAN $200 1 $200 AMMONIUM SULFATE STORAGE DRUM $100 3 $33 AMMONIUM SULFATE DAY TANK $100 3 $33 CL2 PSI GAUGE $100 3 $33 CL2 DRUM $100 3 $33 GENERATOR $35,000 22 $1,591 TELEMETRY PANEL $10,000 22 $455 TELEMETRY ANTENNA $1,000 22 $45 MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH $1,000 22 $45 PROPANE TANK $1,000 22 $45 25 Asset 6FTPERIMETERFENCE $20,000 12 $1,667 GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH $15000 22 $682 YEAR ONE TOTAL (a, WTF's $735,994 26 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 8 Growth Projections and Financial Strategy Population of Everglades City in 2014: 410 Population change since 2000: -14.4% Median resident age: 49.9 years Estimated median household income in 2015: $58,799 (it was $36,667 in 2000) Estimated per capita income in 2015: $28,247 (it was $20,535 in 2000) (Source: http7/lwww.city-data.com/city/Everglades-Florida.htmi) An enterprise fund is established to separate the drinking water account/budget category from other City operations. The WTP and WDS CIPP, O&M/PM and R&R required reserve budgeting worksheets (Appendix E) help determine: - DWS annual revenues from fees, loans and grants, interest from any accounts, and other sources of income. • The City's annual expenditures on maintenance, utilities, salaries and benefits, office supplies, professional services, taxes, and loan payments. • City's net income. • How much additional funding the City will need to continue to operate and maintain the DWS and replace and repair DWS assets. The worksheets should be completed/updated each year at a minimum. They provide an accurate assessment of the City's financial situation and help properly plan for future needs. The budgeting worksheets are intended to help understand the financial position of the City's DWS and forecast any potential shortfalls. They help determine whether the DWS reserve account is adequately funded and whether or not the City should begin searching for additional funding sources. It is not meant to serve as an accounting tool, nor is it intended to replace current accounting practices. For the Fiscal Year ending September 30, 2016, the FRWA rate review reveals $551,885 income generated and $501,101 of total expenses. This results in a net income amounting to $50,784. This amount, however, does not include preliminary DWS CIPP/R&R/PM/O&M budget amounts which total $649,817. It is imperative the City begin funding and utilizing funds to provide Capital Improvements and Operations Maintenance in accordance with an Asset Management Plan. This need is exasperated by the current overall poor condition of the Utility's assets. Per City Ordinance, current water rates are minimum base rate of $11.37 and $3.81 per thousand gallons. Everglades City Asset Management Plan Current Rate Structure: Volume Rate Increments 0.00 $13.00 Base Rate 0 to 3,000 i $0.00 Charge per 1000 gal 3,001 to 20,000 $4.00 Charge per 1000 gal 20,000 to 50,000 $4.00 Charge per 1000 gal 50,000 to 100,000 $4.00 Charge per 1000 gal 100,000 to 200,000 $4.00 Charge per 1000 gal 50,000 to 100,002 $4.00 Charge per 1000 gal 7,000 gal $29.00 avg bill estimated income $439,176.00 avg useage Proposed Water Rate Structure Options: 4/25/2017 Option #1 Revised Rate Structure Volume Proposed rate Increments 0 to 3,000 gal $60.07 Base rate Next 1000 gal $5.72 per 1000 gal 7,000 gal $82.95 avg bill estimated income $1,256,217.85 avg useage Option #3 Revised Rate Structure Volume Proposed rate Increments 0 gal $42.91 Base rate Next 1000 gal $5.72 per 1000 gal 7,000 gal $82.95 avg bill estimated income $1,256,217.85 avg useage 4/25/2017 Other Considerations and Recommendations: 1. Water Loss estimated at 12%. A Water Audit could prove beneficial. 2. Recommend implementing an Asset Management Program for funding infrastructure repair & replacement projects (facilities, pumps, tanks, motors, etc.) 3. Recommend implementing a Major Capital Improvement Program for funding MAJOR long-term projects. Option #2 Revised Rate Structure Volume Proposed rate Increments 0 to 1,000 gal $48.63 Base rate Next 1000 gal $5.72 per 1000 gal 7,000 gal $8295 avg bill estimaledincome $1,256,217.85 avg useage Option #4 Revised Rate Structure Volume Proposed rate Increments 0 to 3,000 gal $60.07 Base rate 3,001 to 5,000 gal $5.72 per 1000 gal 5,001 to 7,000 gal $6.29 per 1000 gal 7,001 to 10,000 gal $6.92 per 1000 gal 10,001 gal+ $7.61 per 1000 gal 7,000 gal $84.10 avg bill estimated income $1,273,543.59 avg useage Other Considerations and Recommendations: 1. Water Loss estimated at 12%. A Water Audit could prove beneficial. 2. Recommend implementing an Asset Management Program for funding infrastructure repair & replacement projects (facilities, pumps, tanks, motors, etc.) 3. Recommend implementing a Major Capital Improvement Program for funding MAJOR long-term projects. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 4. Recommend a Contingency / Emergency Reserve for funding at least three (3) months of utility operations following emergencies / hurricanes. Funds to be set aside in a separate account. 5. Via Ordinance, Implement an automatic yearly increase in rate equal to the Consumer Price Index. 6. All proposed rate options can have added conservation rate tier structure necessary to comply with regulatory water conservation rate practices. 9 Action Plan A review of Everglades City's DWS compliance history with state and federal DW regulations shows an extended history of multiple compliance issues. Please see the April 1, 2016 FDEP Sanitary Survey and 2016 Consumer Confidence Report found in Appendix F. A summary of the Sanitary Survey findings which FRWA staff also observed on their visits over the past 6 months is as follows: There were several cracks on the outside of ground storage tank near the booster station. Within a majority of the cracks, it appears that calcium deposit has built up indicating the possibility of leaks. Also, the foundation of the tank seemed eroded at several places. • High service pumps #3 and #4 appeared to be nonfunctional at the booster station. Also, the rotating mass safeguard for high service pump #1 was missing which poses a safety hazard. Please repair or replace the pumps and related electronic and safety parts. • The recirculation pumps for the ground storage tank at the booster station are not in operation and is unclear if pipes were holding water. Please have these pumps repaired and/or replaced. • There was nonfunctional equipment still connected to the booster station infrastructure that could pose a health and/or security risk. Please assess the equipment and disconnect or remove if no longer in use. • Transfer pump #2 located at the WTP was not operational at the time of inspection and was leaking from the packing gland seal. Please repair or replace the transfer pump. At the time of inspection, there was no emergency response plan available for inspection. Please create and/or maintain an emergency response plan in the plant at all times and in accordance with Rule 62-555.350(15), F.A.C. Everglades City Asset Management Plan Additionally, FRWA staff noted the following: 4/25/2017 Everglades City DWS Critical Needs Items as of week of September 26, 2016 Water Treatment Plant Quantity Item & Description Unit Cost Labor Materials Total Cost 3 WTP TRANSFER PUMPS/MOTORS, 30 HP, VERTICAL SHAFT DRIVEN, CAN -STYLE SUMP $25,000 $10;000 $15,750 $120,750 TWO EXISTING PUMPS/MOTORS Acid wash and inspect can style sump Speculation that groundwater may be infiltrating '70s era can style sumps Only one pump in service at this time, redundant pump is non -operational RECOMMEND CONVERSION TO 3 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS AND PIPING MODIFICATION SEE PICTURE(S) OF EXISTING CONFIGURATION TTL COST BASED ON ESTIMATED COST OF REPLACEMENT WITH CENTRIFUGAL 2 WTP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE $100 $100 $60 $460 Acid wash brine pumps and fittings every 6 months to prevent pump and check valve malfunction. WTP operator/City Staff perform labor. 4 WTP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE $1,000 $4,000 Four each Blue Planet Env. Systems chemical skids: Ammonium Sulfate, Sulfuric Acid, http://www.blueplanetenv.com/index.wsp Sodium Hypochlorite and Anti-scalant (SpectraGuard) FOR O&M SUPPORT QUOTE CONTACT BPES AT (321) 255-1931 OR (888) 859 9726 Warranties recently expired, City Staff/Operator have no formal training or spare parts RECOMMEN D STAFF/OPERATOR TRAIN ING OR FORMAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH SERVICE PROVIDER Fveralades Citv Asset Manaaement Plan 4/25/2017 Quantity Item & Description Unit Labor Materials Total Cost Cost 2 WTP WELLHEADS/WELLS(#6&#7)SUBMERSIBLE $1,500 $3,000 PUMPS Two each wells circuit breakers in control panel trip weekly, have to manually reset. Operator believes well/pump motor improperly sized.... pulling too many amps. RECOMMEND ELECTRICIAN TROUBLESHOOT AND ENGINEER CHECK WELL PUMP/MOTOR DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS S VS EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. IF NEW PUMP/MOTOR REQUIRED COULD COST UPWARDS OF $5-10k 2 WTP WELLHEAD #6 AND #7 $1,000 $1,000 $1,500 $3,500 Surface prep and coat all above ground piping with Tnemec Pota-Pox coating. Existing above ground piping developing significant rust and pitting Repair leak above well seal at well #6. 1 WTP RAW WATER AND FINISHED WATER PIPING $1,000 $500 $1,500 ISOLATION VALVE There exists an interconnection between raw and finished water isolated with an 8 -in rising stem gate valve (FL X FL). Remove 8 -in gate valve install 2 ea 8 -in blind flange Have (8 -in X Valve Lay Length) spool piece fabricated and kept on site for WTP emergency by pass conditions. FDEP ORACLE DATABASE SHOWS WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATING AT OR NEAR FULL (84-96%) PERMITTED CAPACITY OF 0.465 MGD. RECOMMEND REQUEST INCREASE IN PERMITTED CAPACITY THROUGH SFWMD. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 WATER BOOSTER STATION Quantity Item & Description Unit Labor Materials Total Cost Cost 1 25 or 30 HP HIGH SERVICE CENTRIFUGAL $25,000 $5,000 $30,000 PUMP/MOTOR TROUBLESHOOT/ REPAIR/REPLACEMENT Only one pump in service at this time, redundant pump is non -operational EXISTING OPERATIONAL HSP IS VIBRATING AND NOISY BOTH HSP'S SHOULD BE OF SAME HP AND PUMPING RATE EXISTING IS 25 AND 30 Hp RATED AT 325 AND 400 GPM RESPECTIVELY 1 REPLACE ELECTRICAL CONTROL PANEL WHICH $20,000 $10,000 $3,000 $33,000 OPERATES 2 ea HSP's, 2 ea 10 Hp JOCKEY PUMPS & 2 ea 7.5 Hp GST RECIRCULATION PUMPS 1 REPLACE DIESEL DRIVEN FIRE PUMP CONTROL $10,000 $6,000 $2,000 $18,000 PANEL PM FIRE PUMP DIESEL ENGINE DRIVE 1 REPAIR BOOSTER STATION INLET PIPE (8-in/10-in?) $2,000 $2,000 $4,000 FROM GST Remove weak segment of pipe, install (8-in/10-in?) spool piece 1 REPAIR/REPLACE LEAKING (8-IN/10-IN?) SWING $1,000 $3,000 $4,000 CHECK VALVE 1 INSTALL NEW PRESSURE AND FLOW CHART $3,000 $3,000 RECORDER 1 ROOF REPLACEMENT AT BOOSTER STATION $10,000 $10,000 BUILDING 1 R&R 0.50 MG CROM GROUND STORAGE TANK $10,000 $10,000 —15 FT FROM WATER'S EDGE See 2013 Inspection Report. Unclear if corrective recommendations accomplished, splash pads formed not poured. Exterior cracks do not appear to be actively leaking. CaCO3 may have sealed? Cit Asset Mana ement Plan 4/25/2017 QuantityV Item & Description Unit Cost Labor Materials Total Cost 1 PM BOOSTER STATION EMERGENCY POWER BACK UP GENERATOR $1,500 $1,500 Is on 8 to 10 -ft pedestal, could not access to evaluate if operational Operator advised it is operational 1 INSTALL CHLORINE CHEMICAL INJECTOR VS DIRECT PIPE SERVICE SADDLE $1,000 $1, 000 GRAND TOTAL $248,710 GRAND TOTAL W/ 15% CONTINGENCY $286,016 EVERGLADES CITY POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1 REPLACE ACP, CIP, GIP PIPE AND AT LEAST 4 EA 6- IN INOPERABLE GATE VALVES AND 7 FIRE HYDRANTS $75,000 December 4, 2003 record of longest run of 4 -in ACP in W DS, 1930s install @ 1,075 ft Also found highlighted map with various segments of ACP throughout Everglades City WDS Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Sustainable Practice: Energy Management The City's DWS should ensure all assets, not just those connected to a power source, are evaluated for energy efficiency. It is highly recommended to conduct an energy assessment or audit. The following are common energy management initiatives the City should implement going forward: 1. Load management 2. Replace weather-stripping and insulation on buildings. 3. Installation of insulated metal roofing over energy inefficient shingle roofing 4. On -demand water heaters 5. Variable frequency driven pumps and electrical equipment 6. Energy efficient infrastructure 7. LED lighting 8. Meg electric motors 9. MCC electrical lug thermal investigation 10. Flag underperforming assets for rehabilitation or replacement An energy audit is intended to evaluate how much energy is consumed and identify measures that can be taken to utilize energy more efficiently. The primary goal is reducing power consumption and cost through physical or operational changes. Each system will have unique opportunities to reduce energy use or cost depending on system specific changes and opportunities within the power provider's rate schedules. An audit of an individual water treatment plant (WTP) is an attempt to pinpoint wasted or unneeded facility energy consumption. With the cost of electricity on the rise, reducing energy use should be a priority for municipalities. A key part of energy audits is thorough analysis of the effects of overdesign on energy efficiency. Plants are designed to perform at maximum flow and loading conditions. Unfortunately, most plants are not efficient at average conditions. Aging infrastructure is another source of inefficient usage of energy in WTPs across the country. The basis for addressing aging infrastructure related energy waste is also included in the energy audit process. It is recommended to perform an energy audit every 2-3 years to analyze return on investment. Energy Audit Approach The first step to a successful energy audit is to develop an approach. An energy audit can be broken down into five phases. 1. First an energy audit is part of an energy conservation program. Having an energy conservation program in place will help with implementation and monitoring of energy conservation measures (ECM). 2. The second phase is data collection. Gathering as much energy related data, processing that data, and observing unusual energy consumption provides a good starting point for the audit. 3. Following data collection, a site visit is performed. The site visit is the heart of the energy audit process. During the site visit managers and/or operators who are most familiar with the system should be present. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 4. Following the site visit, ECMs are developed, which is the fourth phase of the process. The ECMs are developed based on knowledge gained during the data collection and site visit phases. 5. The final phase is implementation and monitoring of ECMs. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an Energy Star® program for water and wastewater utilities. The program offers an online benchmarking tool as part of the Portfolio Manager. The goal of the program is to help eliminate energy waste and lower operating costs of water and wastewater utilities (EPA, 2010). The Portfolio Manager tool allows utilities to track energy use, energy cost, and carbon emissions. Information about the program can be found at http://www.eneraystar.gov by entering "energy star for water systems" in the search field. Phase 1 - Develop an Energy Conservation Program An energy conservation program will allow water systems to set goals, plan, and implement energy conservation measures. A successful conservation program requires commitment from management and staff. An energy conservation team should be established with a team leader and staff members with knowledge of processes and energy use. Getting input from system staff, especially staff with large amounts of institutional knowledge, is critical to a successful program. Also critical to success is that the team must have the authority and responsibility to implement changes that are identified during the energy audit. Part of developing an energy conservation program includes determining the scope of an energy audit. It is important to note that an energy audit is only a task in an energy conservation program, not the entire program. The audit alone will not result in energy conservation, but the results can be utilized in an energy conservation program for potential implementation and cost savings. The largest energy consumers in a water system are pumps. Therefore, the greatest opportunity for energy reduction would focus on pumping — raw water, in plant, high service, and booster pumps. Narrowing the scope of an energy audit to focus on one aspect of operations would allow the energy conservation team to gain confidence and experience. From there additional aspects of operation, such as treatment processes, compressed air systems, sludge handling, HVAC, and lighting can be included. Phase 2 - Data Collection Before conducting any field work, the auditing team should discuss with operations staff all available process and energy data. Data review and analysis should be performed to familiarize the project team with processes and methods of operation. Electrical energy summaries, equipment inventories, energy diagrams, design data, operating data, and hydraulic profiles should be obtained, where possible, and reviewed. Prepare an inventory of energy uses, including, but not limited to, consumption of natural gas and other fuels, electric motors, and miscellaneous items. A master list of electric motors should be organized by process and should include such information as type of service, number of operating units, unit horsepower, percentage of time utilized, and estimated power consumption. Actual operating data should be used, when possible, to ensure accuracy. Determine the relative energy consumption for each process so that energy -conservation efforts center on items with the highest energy use. Frequently, considerable time and effort is devoted to saving relatively small quantities of energy (such as lighting, building heating, and cooling), when the largest potential savings can be realized in process operations. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Data needed for an energy audit includes: • Flow data (MG or MGD) • Electricity consumption (kWh) • Peak demand (kW) • Electrical rate schedules • Power provider and copies of bills • Pump curves • Design summary drawings and specifications Flow data and electricity consumption are used to determine the specific energy required (kWh/MG) for the various facilities within the system. This allows the facilities to be benchmarked and compared to similar facilities within the system or to other water systems. Determining specific energy also creates a baseline for energy use. This baseline can be used to identify changes in energy use and to track results of energy conservation measures. Creating graphical representations of energy use can help visualize trends and they can be useful for presenting information to others. Phase 3 - Site Visit (Field Investigation) After completing data collection and review the next step is to conduct an on-site investigation of facility operations. The field investigation should include obtaining or identifying any information that was not previously provided, discussion with individuals who are knowledgeable with facility operations, discussion of potential ECMs, and seeking input from the system staff. The energy audit level of detail will depend on the complexity of the system, expertise of the energy conservation team, time available to complete the audit and the goals established for the audit. A key component of the field investigation is simply to ask "what if' or "why" in regards to system processes and operation. It may be possible to identify processes that can be optimized or in some cases eliminated altogether. Oversized or inefficient equipment, inefficient processes, and physical or operational changes may be identified. An ECM can then be developed for making improvements or operational changes. Phase 4 - Develop Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) Energy conservation measures are developed using knowledge gained during data collection and the field investigation. Evaluating whether or not an ECM should be implemented depends on the criteria established. One common criterion is return on investment. An energy conservation project should ideally pay for itself within a predetermined time period. Other criteria used to evaluate ECMs could include availability of funding (including rebates or incentives), condition of existing equipment, and the perception of customers who value environmentally friendly practices. The energy assessment preceding implementation of ECMs should provide an economic analysis of each proposed change, an estimate of cost, and the anticipated energy savings. For the most part these will constitute a planning level analysis. Of the recommended improvements, some will require no further design. However, projects that involve construction or new equipment will require outside expertise for design. Phase 5 - Implementation and Monitoring The energy audit process is a tool to identify energy and or cost saving measures that will benefit the water system. The process is not complete until these measures are implemented. Following implementation, monitoring of the ECM should also be performed to determine the Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 actual benefit being seen by the water system. Energy Consumption and Cost Savings Electrical energy and cost savings can be realized by improving equipment efficiency, demand management, process changes, operational changes, or reducing water loss. Many of the potential energy related improvements are common among all water systems. Some of the typical focus areas during an energy audit are described in the following subsections. This is not an all-inclusive list, as many unique situations exist within individual water systems. However, if the following items are considered, a solid foundation will be established for conducting an energy audit. Energy Consumption Understanding where energy is being consumed is critical to focusing resources where the greatest savings potential exists. The greatest opportunity for savings comes from equipment that is routinely operated or from large improvements in efficiency. Replacing a pump with a limited run time with one that is only slightly more efficient will not likely be cost-effective. The available energy use data should be compiled and summarized for the facilities being audited. A useful measure of performance is specific energy consumption. This measures energy use relative to water production and can be calculated where flow and energy use data is available. Energy cost per million gallons is another useful measure as it will include costs associated with demand and other miscellaneous charges. Another factor to consider is the location of pressure zones within the water system. Simply operating the most efficient well may not be the most efficient option. The location of booster pumps and pressure reducing valves within the system must also be considered. If a booster pump is used then the cost of production will include the energy consumed by the well and booster pumps. Pressure Reducing Valves Pressure reducing valves (PRVs) are necessary to limit system pressure at certain locations in the distribution system. While reducing pressure is necessary, the use of PRVs presents an opportunity to improve energy efficiency. Removing pressure from the system with a PRV also removes energy. Limiting the amount of pressure head that is removed can save energy, especially if water is boosted following a PRV. The use of PRVs in a water system should be limited where practical. Throttling Valves Controlling flow or pressure by throttling a valve is inefficient and presents a good opportunity for energy and cost savings. This is especially true where flow is constantly throttled on the discharge of a pump. Any valve that is not fully open is imparting losses to the system and wasting energy. Several options are available for increasing efficiency, such as; trim the pump impeller, install a new pump that is sized to fit operating conditions, or install a VFD. Each option should be evaluated separately in order to compare capital costs, cost savings, energy reduction, payback time, and operational impacts. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Variable Frequency Drives VFDs are utilized in many applications and within many water systems. VFDs are perhaps the most efficient means to control flow and/or pressure of pumps. Their ability to match flow with demand decreases the number of times a pump starts and reduces surge on the system. Installing a VFD to replace a throttling valve or other types of artificial head can lead to significant energy savings. VFDs can be useful in many applications and generally are extremely useful when applied to water systems. The only drawbacks are their cost and minor electrical losses associated with their use, approximately 3%. A VFD can improve efficiency when a pump is not operating near its best efficiency point (BEP). A pump is run at its best efficiency when the field conditions match the flow and total dynamic head (TDH — static lift plus friction losses) for which the pump was designed. However, the field conditions do not often remain the same. Changes in system pressure, distribution piping, groundwater level, etc. affect the TDH, shifting the pump to the left or the right of its BEP. A VFD can help improve a pump's efficiency when the operating conditions are to the right of the pump's BEP. By reducing the speed of a pump, the operating point will shift left, back to a more efficient range, Water systems can also benefit from reduced demand charges while pumps are operated at less than full speed for an entire billing period. This can occur during off-peak months when the pumps are not required to run at 100% by extending the historical pumping period or in conditions when the pumps are oversized. Demand charges are decreased each month a pump is run at less than full speed. The cost to install a VFD in an outdoor, climate controlled enclosure increases with horsepower. The added load of an air conditioner detracts from the electrical savings obtained with a VFD and needs to be considered in conjunction with the internal VFD losses mentioned previously. Time -of -Use Rate Schedules Some electric utilities offer time -of -use (TOU) rate schedules as a way to limit energy use or on - peak demand during times of peak energy use. The use of TOU rate schedules will likely increase as electric utilities will be faced with either increasing generation capacity or reducing peak energy use. TOU rate schedules can benefit water systems with adequate production and storage capacity. Water production could be shifted to times of off-peak energy use resulting in reduced energy and demand charges. Shifting water production hours would present a significant operational change. However, reduced energy charges and cost savings may warrant the change. Electric Utility Load Management Programs Similar to TOU rate schedules, load management programs are available from some electric utilities. A load management program aims to control the electric loads of customers during times of peak usage. Loads on the electric system are reduced through load management by disconnecting groups of users, ensuring that not all users are consuming power at the same time. Water systems participating in load management programs can still operate on standby generators during times of load management. The load management process can be automated in order to avoid disruption to the water system. A signal is received from the power utility, and the system is transferred to standby power. Cost savings are realized by avoiding demand charges or realizing a reduced demand charge. Everglades City Asset Management Plan Motor Run Times 4125/2017 Demand charges for infrequently used wells comprise a higher percentage of the electric bill than the demand charges of wells used routinely. Once a well is operated and the demand charge is incurred, the cost per million gallons pumped decreases with increased use. Pump Efficiency Pump efficiency affects energy use. The more efficient a pump and motor are, the less energy they use to perform the same amount of work. Regular maintenance should be performed on pumps in order to keep them as efficient as possible. Daily observations such as operating pressure, flow rates, operating sound levels and unusual sounds can give an early indication of pending pumping issues and potential less efficient operation. Also on a routine basis, proper lubrication is to be conducted along with evaluating seal condition, wear ring and impeller conditions, bearing running temperature and condition, amp draw, etc., and compared to historical observations. This can allow for repairs or adjustments to be made early to keep the system operating as efficiently as possible and reducing failures. As pumps near the end of their useful life, they should be replaced by high efficiency pumps and motors. Pump Efficiency Testing Pump efficiency testing is performed to determine the total system efficiency also known as the wire -to -water efficiency. The wire -to -water efficiency of a pump is the relationship between the energy consumed and the amount of water being delivered at a given pumping head. The greater the overall efficiency of the pump, the lower the cost per million gallons pumped will be. Pump efficiency is determined by analyzing the water level in a well or wet well during pumping, discharge flow rates, and power inputs to the pump motor. In order to determine the pumping water level, it is necessary to sound the well. Some pumps have sounding access holes in the pump head. Newer wells may include an airline, which can provide rapid determination of water levels. In order to obtain flow rate, a means of measurement must be available or provided. In many instances, existing installed flow metering devices can be used. If an existing flow element is not available a flow meter may be installed in the discharge line or a strap -on Doppler type device may be used. The ideal location for flow measurement varies by manufacturer, but is commonly specified by stating an unobstructed length of the discharge pipe upstream and downstream of the flow meter (for example no bends, valves, etc. in that "unobstructed" segment). This minimizes turbulence impact on flow measurement accuracy. This unobstructed pipe length is typically in the range of eight times the discharge pipe diameter upstream and five times the pipe diameter downstream. Shorter lengths than recommended by the manufacturer may be used, although the accuracy may be affected. Ideally, a vertical turbine (VT) pump sized for the field conditions should operate at ±76 percent total system efficiency. Submersible pumps are slightly less efficient, at ±72 percent total system efficiency. Pumps driven with a VFD are also less efficient due to losses associated with the VFD. Two causes of poor efficiency for well pumps are typically attributed to mechanical wear and changing groundwater level. Worn impellers, wear rings, and bearings decrease mechanical efficiency while a drop in groundwater level increases the discharge head, pushing the pump back and up on its curve and away from its best efficiency point. Sand is the typical cause of premature wear in a well pump. Worn impellers and wear rings allow water to recirculate in the pump. Manufacturers anticipate about a 20 year life from a well pump due to wear on the impellers, wear rings, and bowls. The cost to replace or rebuild impellers and wear rings can be up to 50 percent of the cost for a new pump. This is usually feasible if the pump is still a good Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 match for the field conditions. Owners typically opt to replace a pump when the repair cost approaches 75 percent of the cost for a new pump. This is usually the case when the line shaft and/or the bowls also need to be replaced. Well pumps with low efficiency should be pulled and modified or replaced to better match head conditions. The flow rate can be changed and the motor can also be replaced where needed. Note that acceptable paybacks are only achievable on wells operated routinely or have an appreciable efficiency improvement. Provisions to perform pump efficiency testing should be considered during the design of new facilities. For example sounding tubes and flow meters should be installed with new wells. Performing pump efficiency testing on existing facilities without these provisions can be difficult or impossible. Compressed Air Systems Compressed air is utilized throughout most plants. Compressed air can be used to operate valve actuators, for filter or membrane air scour and to operate pneumatic tools. Inefficient compressors and leaking air distribution piping are items that should be included in an energy audit. Pneumatic operators consume air and leaking valve actuators can result in a significant increase in run time of air compressors. Filter galleries in particular can be large consumers when fitted with pneumatic operators. When installing new or replacement actuators, certain designs such as some models of rotary vane actuators can drastically reduce air consumption with the side benefit of reducing noise in the filter gallery. Inspection of compressed air systems should be performed regularly to identify leaks or inefficient operations and compressor run times monitored. Energy savings will be achieved be reducing the run time of the air compressors. Additionally, the operating pressure of the system can be set to the minimum system requirement (for example the valve operator's minimum operating pressure) which requires less power to develop. Reducing Water Demand Energy use by a water system is proportional to the amount of water produced. Therefore, reducing water production will reduce energy use. Reducing water demand can be accomplished by reducing water loss and encouraging water conservation. Water Loss Reducing water loss may present the greatest opportunity to reduce energy costs. Reducing water loss can be challenging and may require significant capital investments. Systems with relatively high water loss (greater than 25%) have an opportunity to significantly reduce energy use and costs. All water systems should track water loss and set goals of reducing loss. Systems with high percentages of water loss should make reducing water loss a priority. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) has realized the importance of improving water management and has published a manual "Water Audits and Loss Control Programs". The third edition was published in 2009 and includes a major advancement in water audit methodology, giving water utilities greater guidance in improving accountability and economically controlling water and revenue losses (AWWA, 2009). A water loss control program can identify real losses, unbilled consumption, and apparent losses. In general, real losses are the primary type of loss and include distribution system leakage. Unbilled consumption is typically authorized by the water system. This would include flushing hydrants, backwashing filters or other forms of use by the water system. Apparent losses include accounting errors, meter inaccuracy, and unauthorized consumption. Identifying the source of water loss can be difficult. Implementing a water loss control program will help identify sources of water loss and Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 lead to corrective actions being taken. Water systems typically strive to account for 90% or more of their water. Contact Florida Rural Water Association for assistance in correcting high water loss. Water Conservation Water conservation programs generally focus on educating the customer on efficient water use, environmentally friendly practices, water efficient products, and product rebates. As demand for natural resources increases, water conservation will become an increasingly important issue. Water systems are in a unique position of encouraging their customers to conserve. Successful implementation of water conservation measures may have a negative impact on revenue. Decreased revenue prompts the water system to increase rates and can lead to frustration among consumers who feel they are being punished for their conservation efforts. Implementing conservation measures, such as structured rates, that protect the water system from lost revenue and encourages conservation will be difficult. Rate structures with high fixed costs provide stability to the water utility's revenue but do little to encourage conservation. A rate structure with low fixed costs and tiered rate increases corresponding to water use provide the greatest incentive for conservation. However, such a rate structure leaves the water system vulnerable to volatile revenue. As water conservation becomes increasingly important, water systems in the state of Florida will need to find ways to encourage conservation while generating adequate revenue. SCADA SCADA systems are becoming the norm for control of most treatment facilities due to the affordability of robust computing systems, increased data transmission speed, open architecture design, flexibility and more user friendly control software systems. A computer or computers in conjunction with programmable logic controllers (PLCs), remote telemetry units (RTUs) and other devices add significant flexibility in what data is monitored and collected as well as how equipment can be operated over hardwired relay and switch operated systems. SCADA systems can result in energy savings by optimizing the treatment and pumping operations via real-time monitoring and automated control of equipment and systems. Automated operation or SCADA assisted operation to adjust driver speeds, pump sequencing, elevated storage filling timing, backwash initiation and duration and HVAC monitoring and control are just some of the potential areas where power use can be reduced. Additionally, the SCADA system can be beneficial in actually monitoring energy use, demand peaks, etc. This gives the operations staff members a means of visualizing what their operation decisions have on energy consumption and demand. This can also be taken a step further to incorporate the power provider's rate schedule into the system, such that an approximation of what the power costs are can be shown. As mentioned previously, it is common that the plant staff members do not see the power bills and therefore don't fully understand how their decisions may impact actual costs. HVAC HVAC systems can be gas or electric powered on the heating side and electrical on the cooling side. No matter what the power supply, a cost savings may be available by reducing power consumption by replacement with more efficient systems, however payback can be quite lengthy. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Additionally, a geothermal heating system can be used to provide a much more efficient HVAC system. These utilize a closed loop in which the earth (via a well or buried loop) is used as a heat source or in a water facility the water already being pumped can be used as the source. This is more feasible during initial construction due to the high capital costs, but with the availability of grants, rebates, tax incentives, etc., each application should be evaluated under its own conditions. Check with the power provider for potential rebates on more efficient HVAC systems or components. Modifications to existing systems which may reduce power use at low to no cost include: • Keep filters on forced air units clean to reduce pressure drop; • Seal leaking areas around doors; • Use programmable thermostats to automatically reduce temperature when unoccupied; (check for rebate offers from power provider) • For areas typically unoccupied, reduce normal thermostat temperature in the winter and raise the temperature in the summer where applicable. Lighting Lighting at water treatment facilities can realize a power cost savings associated with lighting spaces. When compared to pumping this can be a much smaller savings, but not insignificant. The savings can be through installation of occupancy sensors, reduced lighting coverage or intensity, using compact fluorescent (CFL) or LED lighting, etc. Savings can be impacted by rebates from the electrical service provider or through grants, incentives, tax breaks, and so on, which are quite prevalent at this time of renewed emphasis on energy conservation. Occupancy sensors turn the lights on when occupancy is detected and turn them off after an area has remained unoccupied for a set period of time. These sensors are most effective at reducing energy consumption from lighting in spaces where occupancy is intermittent or where lights are left on in spaces after occupants leave. Occupancy sensors use passive infrared sensors, ultrasonic sound waves, or both (called "dual technology") to detect occupancy. These sensors can be installed either on walls or ceilings. Wall sensors are typically used in small rooms, such as private offices, whereas ceiling sensors are generally used in larger rooms. Each sensor manufacturer has its own style of occupancy sensors. In general, ultrasonic sensors are more sensitive and work in the majority of spaces but are subject to false "ons" due to air movement and motion outside of doors. Infrared sensors have a more focused coverage range and are more appropriate for smaller rooms, such as private offices. Dual technology sensors use an infrared sensor to activate lights and use an ultrasonic sensor to keep lights on, thus reducing false "ons" and "offs." We suggest consulting the manufacturer's literature to select the sensor with the right coverage area and sensor technology for each particular space. Reducing lighting lamination is a consideration. Designers follow typical standards when lighting spaces that may be more than needed or desired in certain areas. Reducing lamp wattages will directly reduce lighting energy usage. CFL and LED lights significantly reduce the kW usage to provide the same lamination as incandescent lighting. CFLs currently consume less than 25% of the power of an incandescent bulb, with a 23W CFL being essentially equivalent to a 100W incandescent bulb and the expected life of the bulbs are 8 to 15 times longer. CFL cost has reduced significantly over recent years, making them cost-effective in many instances. LED lamps are even more efficient, at approximately 10% of the energy consumption of an incandescent bulb, and with a life exceeding 25 years. The cost of LED lamps are still quite Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 high, and CFLs currently are more cost-effective, but comparative analysis warranted. The use of LEDs in inaccessible areas may be desirable due to their extremely long life, regardless of the cost savings. Unnecessary Equipment There are cases in which equipment or processes are installed in a Water treatment facility or distribution system which are not necessary to provide safe, reliable drinking water in compliance with SDWA requirements. This may be due to construction in anticipation of future regulations, changes in source water characteristics, effectiveness of treatment, demand, and numerous other factors. In such cases, the system can reduce operation or eliminate such unnecessary processing to reduce power consumption. Just because the equipment exists, or that is the way it was always operated, does not mean it needs to be operated or operated that way. Evaluate the process and operate as required to meet regulatory requirements in a safe and reliable manner without additional unnecessary steps. Energy Conservation Measures Ideally, several ECMs were identified during the data collection and site visit phases of the energy audit. An ECM can be either a physical change, like replacing oversized pumps, or an operational change, such as setting the most efficient well as the lead well with others set for backup. Potential ECMs should be evaluated to determine how proposed changes will affect the water system, what the energy or cost savings will be, and what costs are associated with the ECM. Each system will have unique opportunities and criteria for implementing changes. The previous sections provided a background for conducting an energy audit. In addition to the physical and operational changes already discussed, the table below provides typical water and wastewater high -use energy operations and associated potential energy saving measures. OperationsHigh Energy Using Reduce load • Manage load • Water to wire efficiency Pumping • Pump selection • Motor and drive selection • Automated control • Fine bubble • Improved mechanical surface aerators • Premium motors Aeration • High efficiency motor drive • Blower variable frequency drives • Automatic DO control • Replace vacuum systems • Premium motors Dewatering • Variable frequency drives for plant water pump Ever lades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 High Energy• Operations Enera y Saving Measures • Motion sensors Lighting • T5 low and high bay fixtures • Pulse start metal halide • Indirect fluorescent • Super -efficient T8s•Comprehensive control for large buildings • Water source heat pumps • Prescriptive incentives for remote telemetry units Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning (HVAC) • Custom incentives for larger units • Low volume fume hood • Occupancy controls • Heat pump for generator oil sump Renewable Power Renewable power gained popularity in recent years as increasing energy costs and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions have become national priorities. An emphasis has been placed on clean energy that can be produced domestically. The current trend has been for large installations, such as large wind farms and solar arrays. However, advances in renewable technology are being made that will allow small installations to be cost-effective. Technological advances and funding opportunities may make renewable power a viable option for small water systems. Solar Power Solar energy technology has a number of different systems and variations of those systems. In addition, many of the technologies are advancing at this time with changes in the unit cost and development of larger and more efficient systems. In general, solar energy can be separated into systems that generate electrical energy and those that generate thermal energy. Solar electrical generation systems are photovoltaic (PV) and thermal energy generation systems are concentrating solar power (CSP). Both PV and CSP have a number of subsets or variations on the basic technology. Almost all of these systems are proprietary and have manufacturers who specialize and develop standard products. The following provides more detailed information regarding the PV electrical energy systems. Photovoltaic PV systems generate electricity as the light rays travel through a medium such as silicon crystals. The panels generate direct current power. Inverters are used to transform the power into alternating current (AC) power commonly provided by utilities. Each type of PV material will tend to capture the energy from a portion of the wave lengths or spectrum of the light source (e.g. red, yellow, or blue). Advances in PV material and systems are occurring and there has been a general improvement in the efficiency of the systems over time. The main components of the systems include: PV material a. Crystalline — single and multi -junction Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 b. Thin film • Tracking a. Fixed — flat or tilted — generally facing south in the northern hemisphere. b. Single axis tracking — generally rotating east to west as the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening. c. Double axis tracking — rotating east to west and up and down as the sun varies by day and season. • Light Concentration a. Flat panels with no magnification or focusing. b. Concentrating PV with mirrors or lenses to concentrate the sunlight into a smaller area. • Capacity or Size a. Size or capacity vary widely with larger systems currently in development. Installation capacities vary from small 10 watt panels to charge batteries, 500KW systems to provide a portion of a commercial building's electrical needs, to a 10- 250MW utility grade solar power plant connected to the utility's high voltage transmission system. • Proprietary Systems a. Wide arrays of proprietary systems are commercially available. Some systems are specially designed for residential, commercial/industrial, or utility installation. Building integrated systems for roofs, windows, light weight roof installation, flexible thin film membrane, mobile systems, emergency power, battery charging, and numerous other systems are available. Solar PV Pros: • Low land use when installed on available rooftop and above parking area square footage. • No transmission requirements. • Provide power during peak demand as solar intensity typically coincides with peak power uses such as air conditioning peaks on hot summer days. • Ability to ramp up quickly. Solar PV Cons: • Without energy storage (such as a battery), it is a "must take" energy source. • Storing large amounts of electricity can be difficult. • Dollar per watt is expensive when compared to large-scale base -load units. • Variable and uncertain energy source. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), U.S. Department of Energy map below illustrates the solar resource potential by region. Solar conversion is an inefficient process; typical PV cells have a conversion efficiency ranging from 10% to 16%. The solar resource potential is reported in units of kilowatt-hour per square meter produced over the course of one day. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 United States Photovoltaic Sotar Resource : Flet Plate Tilted at Latitude i'" q Wind Power The United States has the benefit of holding a vast wind power resource. Total wind power available in a region is calculated by multiplying the total kinetic energy per unit mass by the flow rate. Wind turbines are unable to extract the total power available as that would require reducing the wind speed to zero. Instead, the actual power extracted is found by the actual pressure and velocities before and after the turbine. However, the greater the total ideal power, the greater the actual power extracted. The method of multiplying total kinetic energy per unit mass results in the total ideal power being proportional to the cube of the wind velocity. Wind velocity is therefore critically important to feasible wind power generation. There are two classifications of wind energy technologies: large scale industrial and small scale distributed or commercial systems. • Industrial wind energy referred to as wind farms consist of larger groups of horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) that are capable of producing in the range of 660 kW to 3 MW of power output each. - Distributed or commercial systems consist of smaller HAWT or vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) and are typically mounted on top of, or amongst, urban construction. Industrial commercial system turbines are typically HAWT configuration and are capable of producing in the range of up to 50 to 250 kW of power output each. Residential and commercial distributed systems are capable of producing in the range of 400 watts to 50 kW. These systems have varying hub heights and turbine spacing requirements. Everglades City Asset Management Plan Distributed Wind Power Pros: • Low land use. • No transmission requirements. • Provide power during peak demand. • Able to ramp up quickly. Distributed Wind Power Cons: • Without energy storage (such as a battery), it is a "must take' energy source. • Variable and uncertain energy source. • Storing large amounts of electricity can be difficult. • Dollar per watt is expensive when compared to large-scale base -load units. Alternative Energy Conclusion 4/2512017 Solar, and wind may be long-term options considered for continued DWS operation. Considering these systems are likely a long term installation, the payback period may be feasible. Key points to consider for green energy applications include: • Grant funding availability to help offset costs • Partnerships with private utilities for sale of excess power produced Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Water System Energy Audit Approach Checklist Determine type of audit =Pumping, HVAC, lighting, and/or process Determine audit team members, everyone will have different goals Engineers - reduce energy cost Plant staff - reduce disruption to system Electric utility - reduce peak demand Collect data Power bills - get actual bills that show energy use, demand charges, cost adjustments, etc Electric rate schedules - get current rate schedules Alternative rate schedules - are alternate rates available that will benefit the water system? Flow data - include booster stations, wells, high service pumps, anything with a flow meter Meter data - sold vs produced, bulk purchases or sales, water loss data Pump curves - collect pump curves to verify pumps are operating near their design point Process flow diagrams, design summary - useful to help understand operation of the system Water quality standards - any unique processes required? Previous audit findings - have energy audits been performed in the past? System pressure - operating pressures with distribution system Pressure zones - how are different zones operated, how is water moved around the system? PRVs - amount of head removed, number sn the system, any way to limit wasting head? Reservoirs - storage capacity, elevation, head range Compressed air systems - horsepower, receiver tank size, devices consuming compressed air HVAC - efficiency and performance of existing equipment Gas bills - HVAC audit Lighting - efficiency and performance of existing lights Conduct Site Visit Meet with staff and operators Q&A session - discuss operations, gain understanding of how system is operated Seek input from operators and those familiar with the sytem Walk through - tour facilities, more Q&A Obtain any missing info, check motor sizes, observe valve positions Focus on big power consumers, they will offer best payback opportunity Raw water pumping, wells, HSP, air compressors - typically largest power consumers Seek energy efficiency ideas from plant staff Develop Energy Conservation Measures Estimate energy or cost savings Determine capital cost Consider operational impacts to the plant Look for rebates or incentives Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 References for Energy Conservation in Water Facilities USDOE (US Department of Energy), 2006. Energy Demands on Water Resources: Report to Congress on the Interdependencies of Energy and Water. USDOE, Washington. Biehl, W.H. & Inman, J.A., 2010. Energy Optimization for Water Systems. Jour. AWWA, 102:6:50. EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 2002. Water and Sustainability (Volume 4): U.S. Electricity Consumption for Water Supply & Treatment — The Next Half Century, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2000. 1006787. EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 2010. Energy Star for Wastewater Plants and Drinking Water Systems. www.energystar.gov. EAP (US Environmental Protection Agency), 2008. Ensuring a Sustainable Future: An Energy Management Guidebook for Wastewater and Water Utilities. AWWA (American Water Works Association), 2009. Water Audits and Loss Control Programs, 3rd edition (Manual of water supply practices, M36). AWWA, Denver, CO. Roberts, D.W.; Kubel, D.; Carrie, A.; Schoeder, D.; & Sorenson, C., 2008. Cost and Benefits of Complete Water Treatment Plant Automation. AWWARF and IWA, London. Sustainable Practice: Water Efficiency Unaccounted for water represents lost revenue. Water efficiency measures incorporated into the City's AM strategy will minimize water loss. The City is looking to improve its water loss prevention and water efficiency initiatives. FRWA recommends to undertake some or all of the following initiatives: 1. FRWA assisted leak detection auditing. 2. Annual pipe replacement program — Replace aging iron and asbestos cement piping. 3. Installation of proper shut-off valves throughout the city. Currently, large areas of the system frequently must be shut down in order to repair distribution main leaks. 4. Distribution meter replacement on a recurring pro -active schedule. 5. Large meter testing — There are eight 2 -inch and larger meters in the distribution system. 6. Consumer -based water conservation measures and incentive programs a. Low flow shower heads. b. Low flow commodes. c. Educational campaigns for school children and consumers. d. Assist customers with conducting individual Water Use Audits helping to identify ways to reduce water use inside and outside the home. The South Florida Water Management District offers assistance with conservation measures and incentive programs. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Sustainable Practice: Climate Change As our planet becomes ever increasingly populated, so does natural resource taxation. As certain natural resources are depleted and carbon monoxide emission increases, planet earth experiences global warming, conducive to climate change. Natural disasters, sea level rise or other effects of climate change may damage or destroy DWS assets and/or alter supply. The City's current 12 -month 0.240 MGD average daily demand is well below the storage capacity of 1.0 MGD. Future water use projections and population growth pose little concern for the foreseeable future. The City's strategies for mitigating climate change induced impacts are discussed in their emergency response plan. Regional Planning The City has an established relationship with Collier County and the Collier County Utility Services Department. Adoption FRWA will present the FSAMP to the City Council and address any questions or concerns. Implementation FRWA will support FSAMP implementation by utility management. 9.1 Review Schedule Everglades City's Utilities Department should review its AMP annually to ensure it remains relevant and up-to-date. The annual review should occur before developing an annual budget and list of scheduled or needed capital improvements. Furthermore, the City will most likely need to revisit and update their AMP more frequently as water system plans are developed, modified and as preventive maintenance and repairs occur. Updating the AMP reinforces the "Plan -Do -Check -Act" or continual improvement management framework, which will help the City understand progress, establish measures of performance, identify future improvement opportunities and guide the decision making process. To accurately track each asset's condition, the asset inventory component should be updated as system improvements occur. For example, every time an employee inspects a particular asset, he or she can gather asset data and update the asset inventory. Additionally, as staffing changes occur, the system should update the Staff Information component. FRWA is available to assist in annual FSAMP updates. Everglades City is scheduled to review this plan annually and update the community on new information and changes at the beginning of each Fiscal Year. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 10 Appendices APPENDIX A 4/25/2017 EVERGLADES CITY'S DRINKING WATER TREATMENT WORKS DETAILED INVENTORY CONDITION AND CRITICALITY RATING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT Asset inventory and criticality rating is at the heart of asset management. For purposes of the FSAMP, DW treatment components are organized into functional rating groups for simplicity. To establish priority for operations and maintenance or capital improvements funding for each item, two important rating criteria are defined — "Condition" and "Criticality". The numerical scheme for each rating category is as follows: Condition Numeric Rating: When considering an individual component's condition it is helpful to think of it in terms of "need". The higherthe number, the higher the maintenance / repair needs of the asset. When compared to the criticality rating, two higher numbers alert the reader that a particular asset is both highly critical and in high need of maintenance or repair (poor condition). Comparing condition with criticality serves great purpose in the utility's FSAMP. First, it alerts the utility which assets have the greatest level of concern for maintenance or repair. Second, it helps determine what type of preventive maintenance should be in place for each given asset and how often to perform routine preventive maintenance. Third, it helps determine which priority level is assigned to each asset for maintenance, repair or Cl funding. 0 — Non -Existent Asset is not needed for current operation. It is abandoned or no longer exists. 1 — Excellent Asset is in sound physical condition. It is likely to perform adequately without major rehabilitation for 20 years or more. 2 — Good Asset is in acceptable physical condition. There is minimal short term risk of failure but potential for deterioration in the long term. Only minor work required (if any). 3 — Fair Significant deterioration evident. Failure is unlikely within the next 5 years but further deterioration is likely and major rehabilitation or replacement is likely within the next 10 years. Minor components or isolated sections of the asset need rehabilitation or replacement soon but asset still functions safely at an adequate level of service. Work is required but asset is still operable. 4 — Poor Failure is likely in the short-term, with substantial work required to sustain asset function. Rehabilitation or replacement of most or all of asset will be necessary in the next 5 years. Asset may be barely functional. 5 — Very Poor Asset has failed or failure is imminent. Most or all of this asset requires rehabilitation or replacement. There is great risk to sustained operation. Asset performance causes risk to health and safety of personnel. Everglades City Asset Management Plan Condition Assessment 4/25/2017 Expected Remaining Asset Useful Life Age Useful Life Condition Service Needs 1 HSP 1 PUMP 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Very Poor Needs rehab/replaced 2 HSP 1 MOTOR 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Very Poor Needs rehab/replaced 3 FIRE PRESSURE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Very Poor Inop - needs replaced SENSOR TRANSMITTER 4 MASTER FIRE PUMP 30 -yrs 38 -yrs -8-yrs Very Poor Inop - needs replaced CONTROLPANEL 5 ANALOG FLOW 15 -yrs 38 -yrs 723 -yrs Very Poor Out of service - needs METER removed 6 FLOW CHART 15 -yrs 38 -yrs -23-yrs Very Poor Out of service - needs RECORDER removed 7 24 HR CHART 15 -yrs 38 -yrs -23-yrs Very Poor Out of service - needs RECORDER removed 8 CL2/PH AUTO- 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Very Poor Out of service - needs SAMPLER removed 9 CL2 ROOM FAN 10 -yrs 17 -yrs -7-yrs Very Poor Inop - needs replaced 10 OLD WELL PUMP 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Poor Needs rehab 11 HIGH SERVICE PUMP 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced #1 12 HIGH SERVICE PUMP 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced #1 MOTOR 13 HIGH SERVICE PUMP 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced #2 14 HIGH SERVICE PUMP 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced #2 MOTOR 15 FILTER EFFLUENT 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Poor Needs calibration METER checked 16 HSP 2 PUMP 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced 17 HSP 2 MOTOR 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced 18 HSP 2 CHECK VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Poor Leaking 19 JOCKEY PUMP 2 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMP 20 JOCKEY PUMP 2 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced MOTOR 21 JOCKEY PUMP 1 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMP 22 JOCKEY PUMP 1 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced MOTOR 23 RECIRCULATION 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMPIPUMP I-,-- Ni., n... 01- 4/2512017 Expected Age i Remaining Condition Service Needs Asset Useful Life Usefu Life 24 RECIRCULATION 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMP 1 MOTOR 25 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMP 2 PUMP 26 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced PUMP 2 MOTOR 27 HSP HOA SWITCHES 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced 28 JP HOA SWITCHES 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced 29 RP HOA SWITCHES 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Poor Needs rehab/replaced 30 TRANSFORMER 30 -yrs 38 -yrs -8-yrs Poor Beyond Expected Lifespan 31 PRESSURE CONTROL 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good VALVE 32 OCV GATE VALVE 1 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 33 OCV GATE VALVE 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 34 OCV PRESSURE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs 35 PRESSURE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -28-yrs EGoodGAUGE TRANSMITTER (influent) 36 DIESEL PUMP ENGINE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs (hsp) 37 DIESEL PUMP PUMP 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good (hsp) 38 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 1 39 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 2 40 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 3 (diesel pump) 41 8" CHECK VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good (diesel pump) 42 EFFLUENT FLOW 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Goad TRANSMITTER 43 DIESEL PUMP 5 -yrs 38 -yrs -33-yrs Good BATTERIES (2) 44 PRESSURE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -28-yrs Good TRANSMITTER (effluent) 45 EFFLUENT PRESSURE 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good GAUGE 46 EFFLUENT PRESSURE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good CONTROLVALVE Everalades Citv Asset Manaaemenf Plan Expected Remaining Remaining Asset Useful Life A Ag Useful Life Condition Service Needs 47 6" BUTTERFLY VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good (@ pressure control valve) 48 DIESEL PUMP 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good COOLING WATER GATE VALVE 1 49 DIESEL PUMP COOL 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good ING WATER GATE VALVE 2 50 DIESEL PUMP 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good COOLING WATER CHECK VALVE 51 DIESEL PUMP 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good COOLING WATER AIR RELIEF VALVE 52 GROUND STORAGE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good TANK 53 HSP I INFLUENT GATE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good VALVE 54 HSP 1 AIR RELIEF 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good VALVE 55 HSP EFFLUENT GATE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good VALVE 56 HSP 1 CHECK VALVE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good 57 HSP 2 INFLUENT 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good BUTTERFLY VALVE 58 HSP 2 INLET PSI 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good GAUGE 59 HSP 2 OUTLET PSI 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good GAUGE 60 HSP 2 EFFLUENT 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good BUTTERFLY VALVE 61 HSP 1&1 EFFLUENT 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good VALVE 62 AMMONIUM SULFATE 20 yrs 38 yrs -18-yrs Good INJECTOR 63 SODIUM 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good HYPOCHLORITE INJECTOR 64 JOCKEY PUMP 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good BUTTERFLY VALVE 65 JOCKEY PUMP 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good INFLUENT GATE VALVE 66 JOCKEY PUMP 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE E lades Cit Asset Mana ement Plan 4/25/2017 ver Expected Age Remaining Condition Service Needs Asset Useful Life Useful Life 67 JOCKEY PUMP 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good CHECK VALVE 68 JOCKEY PUMP 2 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good EFFLUENT GATE VALVE 69 JOCKEY PUMP 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good INFLUENT GATE VALVE JOCKEY PUMP 1 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE F70 71 JOCKEY PUMP 1 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Good CHECK VALVE 72 JOCKEY PUMP 1 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good INFLUENT GATE VALVE 73 JOCKEY PUMP 1 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good EFFLUENT GATE VALVE 74 JOCKEY PUMP 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good OUTLET GATE VALVE (BOTH) 75 JOCKEY PUMP FLOW 15 -yrs 38 -yrs -23-yrs Good METER (BOTH) 76 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP INLET BUTTERFLY VALVE (BOTH) 77 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP 1 INLET GATE VALVE 78 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP 1 CHECK VALVE 79 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP l OUTLET GATE VALVE 80 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP 21NLET GATE VALVE 81 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP 2 CHECK VALVE 82 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP 2 OUTLET GATE VALVE 83 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE (BOTH) Everalades Citv Asset Manaaement Plan nc nn I Asset Expected Useful Life Age Remaining Useful Life Condition Service Needs 84 RECIRCULATION 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good PUMP OUTLET GATE VALVE (BOTH) 85 PRESSURE CONTROL 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good VALVE 86 PRESSURE CONTROL 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good INLET BUTTERFLY VALVE 87 PRESSURE CONTROL 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good OUTLET BUTTERFLY VALVE 88 EMERGENCY 20 -yrs 38 -yrs -18-yrs Good EYEWASH/SHOWER 89 EFFLUENT METER 50 -yrs 7 -yrs 43 -yrs Good INLET GATE VALVE 90 EFFLUENT METER 50 -yrs 7 -yrs —43-yrs—Good BYPASS GATE VALVE 91 EFFLUENT METER 15 -yrs 7 -yrs 8 -yrs Good 92 EFFLUENT METER 50 -yrs 7 -yrs 43 -yrs Good OUTLET GATE VALVE 93 EFFLUENT SAMPLE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Good TAP 94 PANELVIEW 600 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Good 95 BREAKER PANEL BOX 30 -yrs 38 -yrs -8-yrs Good 96 MAIN DISCONNECT 30 -yrs 38 -yrs -8-yrs Good SWITCH (TRANSFORMER) 97 AUTO -DIALER 30 -yrs 17 -yrs 13 -yrs Good (PRESSURE) 98 AMMONIUM SULFATE 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) FEED TOTE 99 SULFURIC ACID FEED 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) DRUM 100 ANTI-SCALANT FEED 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) TOTE 101 SODIUM 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) HYPOCHLORITE FEED DRUM ASTAIRS 102 5 FT MOBILE 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) (GRAY) 103 7 FT MOBILE STAIRS 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) (YELLOW) 104 BLUE STORAGE 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) CABINET 105 YELLOW STORAGE 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair( werage) CABINET E i d C' A set Mana ement Plan 4/25/2017 veEg a es s Expected Age Remaining Condition Service Needs Asset Useful Life Useful Life 106 PALLET JACK 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair(Average) 107 HSP METER 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) los HSP PRESSURE 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE 109 HSP #1 CHECK VALVE 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) 110 HSP #1 ISOLATION 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) VALVE 111 HSP FILTER BYPASS 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) BUTTERFLY VALVE 1 112 HSP FILTER BYPASS 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 113 FILTER H OUSING 1A 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) 114 FILTER HOUSING 1B 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) 115 FILTER HOUSING 2A 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) 115 FILTER HOUSING 2B 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) 117 FILTER INLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE IA 118 FILTER OUTLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE 1A 115 FILTER INLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE IB 120 FILTER OUTLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE IB 121 FILTER INLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE2A 122 FILTER OUTLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE2A 123 FILTER INLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE2B 124 FILTER OUTLET PSI 20 -yrs 35 -yrs -15-yrs Fair (Average) GAUGE2B 125 FILTER GATE VALVE #1 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) 126 FILTER GATE VALVE #2 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) 27(Average)FILTER GATE VALVE #3 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair 128 FILTER GATE VALVE #4 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) 129. FILTER GATE VALVE #5 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) 130 EMERGENCY 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) EYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #1 131 EMERGENCY 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) EYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #2 Everalades Citv Asset Manaaement Plan ncnn, Asset Expected Useful Life Age Remaining Useful Life Condition Service Needs 132 EMERGENCY 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) EYEWASH/SHOWER STATION #3 133 PS 1 ON/OFF TO yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) MERCURY SWITCH 134 PS 2 LOW PSI SWITCH 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 135 HSP 1 FILTER 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) EFFLUENT VALVE 135 HSP 2 FILTER 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) EFFLUENT VALVE 137 CENTURY LINK 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) MODEM 138 FORTI WIFI 30D 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 139 WTP GENERATOR 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) 14o WTP GENERATOR 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) FUELTANK tai WTP GENERATOR 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) TRANSFER SWITCH 142 2" WTP RPZ 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 143 SODIUM 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) HYPOCHLORITE DRUM 144 FRONT EXHAUST FAN 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 145 REAR EXHAUST FAN 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 1746 CEILING FAN (BIG 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) ONE) 147 MOTORIZED PALLET 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) JACK 148 CRAFTSMAN 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) ROLLAWAY TOOLBOX 149 FACE SHIELD 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 150 RUBBER GLOVES 5 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 151 RUBBER COVERALLS 5 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 152 RUBBER BOOTS 5 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 153 1/4,3/8, 1/2" 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) CRAFTSMAN SOCKET SET 154 3/4" CRAFTSMAN 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) SOCKET SET 155 1/2" IMPACT 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) WRENCH 156 HAMMER DRILL 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) E I d Cit Asset Mana ement Plan 4/25/2017 vwq a es g Expected Age Remaining Condition Service Needs Asset Useful Life Useful Life 157 SAWZALL 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 158 CHEMICAL FEED 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) SPARE PARTS 159 SPARE PULSAFEEDER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) CHEM PUMPS 160 SPARE FILTER 5 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) ELEMENTS 161 SPARE GENERATOR 5 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) FILTERS 162 SPARE HIGH SERVICE 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) PUMP 163 50 GAL WATER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) HEATER 164 WTP A/C UNIT 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 165 WTP A/C AIR 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair(Average) HANDLER 166 AMMONIUM SULFATE 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) SKID 167 SULFURIC ACID SKID 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 168 ANTI-SCALANT SKID 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 169 SODIUM 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) HYPOCHLORITE SKID 170 WTP CHAINLINK 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) FENCE 171 WELL 6 SUBMERSIBLE 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) PUMP 172 WELL 6 FLOW METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 173 WELL METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) BYPASS 174 WELL6CHAINLINK 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) FENCE 175 WELL SECURITY 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) LIGHT 176 WELL SUBMERSIBLE 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) PUMP 177 WELL 7 FLOW METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 178 WELL 7 METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) BYPASS 179 WELL 7 CHAINLINK 50 -yrs 3 -yrs 47 -yrs Fair (Average) FENCE 180 WELL 7 SECURITY 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) LIGHT 181 COPELAND GROUND 50 -yrs 35 -yrs 15 -yrs Fair (Average) STORAGETANK 382 t1R.O. SKID 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) Everglades Cit Asset Management Plan /25/2017 Asset Expected Useful Life Age Remaining Useful Life Condition Service Needs 183 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 30-yrs3-yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) 184 BREAKER PANEL 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) 185 CL2 PUMP 1 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 186 CL2 PUMP 2 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 187 NH3 PUMP 1 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 188 FLOW TOTALIZER/SIGNAL GENERATOR 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 189 AMMONIUM SULFATE STORAGE DRUM 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 150 AMMONIUM SULFATE DAY TAN K 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs —Fair (Average) 191 CL2 PSI GAUGE 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 192 CL2 DRUM 20 -yrs 17 -yrs 3 -yrs Fair (Average) 193 GENERATOR 30 -yrs 8 -yrs 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 194 TELEMETRY PANEL 30 -yrs 8 -yrs 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 195 TELEMETRY ANTENNA 30 -yrs 8 -yrs 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 196 MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH 30 -yrs 8 -yes 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 197 PROPANETANK 30 -yrs 8 -yrs 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 198 6 FT PERIMETER FENCE 50 -yrs 38 -yrs 12 -yrs Fair (Average) 199 GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH 30 -yrs 8 -yrs 22 -yrs Fair (Average) 200 OAKTON PC 700 METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 201 LAMOTTE CL2 METER 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 202 MYRON CONDUCTIVITY METER 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 203 HACH APA 6000 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 204 HACH CL -17 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 205 SAMPLE WATER FLOW INDICATOR 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 206 HACH SC200 TURBIDITY/CONDUCT[ VITY METER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 207 HACH 1720E TUBIDIMETER 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) z08 SMALL REFRIGERATOR 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 209 LARGE REFRIGERATOR 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) ,., nn.,...,..o--, orm., 4/25/2017 Expected Age Remaining Condition Service Needs Asset Useful Life Useful Life 210 HP Z230 COMPUTER 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 211 VIEWSONIC 22" 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) MONITOR 212 DESK FAN 20 -yrs 3 -yrs 17 -yrs Fair (Average) 213 USABLUEBOOKCL2 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) METER 214 MAGNETIC SAMPLE 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) STIRRER 215 PARKWAY RV PARK 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) FLUSH STAND 1 216 PARKWAY RV PARK 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) FLUSH STAND 2 217 SMALLWOOD STORE 30 -yrs 3 -yrs 27 -yrs Fair (Average) FLUSH STAND 218 AIRPORT BLACKFLOW 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) PREVENTER 219 DARTER'S COVE 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 220 THE ESTUARY 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 1 221 THE ESTUARY 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 2 222THE ESTUARY 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 3 223 EVERGLADES ISLE 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 1 Zz4 EVERGLADES ISLE 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 2 HAMILTON'S FISH 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) HOUSE BACKFLOW 1 HAMILTON'S FISH 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Falr (Average) [227 HOUSE BACKFLOW 2 COURTHOUSE 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 1 COURTHOUSE 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) BACKFLOW 2 229 WWTP BACKFLOW 1 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) 230 WWTP BACKFLOW 2 50 -yrs 17 -yrs 33 -yrs Fair (Average) 231 AIRPORT METER 3" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 232 AIRPORT METER 6" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 233 PARTNER'S COVE 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) METER 2" 234 PARTNER'S COVE 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) METER 8" 235 THE ESTUARY METER 15 -yrs 17 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 3" Everqlades City Asset Manaqement Plan Asset Expected Useful Life Age Remaining Useful Life Condition Service Needs 235 THE ESTUARY METER 3/4" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 237 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 8" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 238 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 2" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 239 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 1" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 240 WWTP METER 2" 15 -yrs 17 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 241 FIRST AID KIT 10 -yrs 3 -yrs 7 -yrs Excellent 242 TURBIDITY STANDARDS 1 -yrs 3 -yrs -2-yrs Excellent 243 CL-17REAG ENT SET 1 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 244 DPD COMPOUND 1 -yrs 3 -yrs -2-yrs Excellent 245 SULFURIC ACID SOLUTION 1 -yrs 3 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 245 PH BUFFER SET 1 -yrs 3 -yrs -2-yrs Excellent 247 PH ELECTRODE STORAGE SOLUTION 1 -yrs 3 -yrs -2-yrs Excellent 248 ALCONOX CLEANER 1 -yrs 3 -yrs -2-yrs Excellent Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Criticality Numeric Rating: When considering the criticality of an individual component (a pressure switch for instance) the following "criticality factors' are taken into account: Will its failure affect the entire system operation or just a local component? How redundant is the component? Can it be replaced in a timely manner, or will it take days / weeks to repair? How will seasonal demands affect criticality? For example, if a well's pressure switch fails, the well is inoperable. So the switch has high criticality for the well (local criticality), but if there are other wells which adequately meet demand, it doesn't have a high criticality for system operation. If there are suitable replacements on hand, the switch can be replaced in a matter of hours and the well is functioning again quickly. So on a scale of 1-5, the pressure switch might be assigned a rating of 3 due to mitigating factors of local impact only, redundancy and brief down time. Alternatively, if a lightning strike burns the PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) which sends commands to all the system's wells, the effect is system -wide. The PLC is probably not redundant and cannot be replaced in a timely manner. Additionally, lightning is more likely to occur in the summer months when seasonal demand is on the rise. In this scenario, the PLC is assigned a criticality rating of 5. 0 — Non -Existent Asset is not needed for current operation. It is abandoned or no longer exists. 1 — Non -Critical Asset not essential to maintaining customer service or regulatory compliance. 2 — Low Impact Asset service interruption has small impact system -wide, short term impact, impacts a small number of customers or has little chance of regulatory non-compliance. 3 — Critical Asset service interruption has more substantial impact system -wide, longer-term impact, affects a higher number of customers or has a good chance of regulatory non-compliance. 4 — Very Critical Asset service interruption has serious impact system -wide, long-term impact, affects large number of customers, or may cause serious regulatory non-compliance. Also may include a high risk of negative environmental impact, possibility of severe damage to other assets or major negative health and safety risk for system staff and general population. 5 — Must Have Asset failure leads to widespread system catastrophe, long-term failure, major customer service interruptions, serious negative environmental impact, long-term damage to other assets, serious public health and safety impact or likely regulatory enforcement action. It is worth repeating that tracking asset inventory, condition and criticality are the central focus of asset management. Therefore, spreadsheets for system inventory and criticality are intended to be a working management tool and should be updated and adjusted at least annually. 63 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Criticality Worksheets Date Inventory Updated: January 19, 2017 4/25/2017 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy ;Criticality 1 DIESEL PUMP BATTERIES (2) 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Catastrophic 3 DIESEL PUMP ENGINE (hsp) -18-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 4 DIESEL PUMP PUMP (hsp) -18-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 5 FIRE PRESSURE SENSOR TRANSMITTER 18 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Catastrophic 7 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1 -15-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 8 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #1 MOTOR 15 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 9 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #2 15 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 10 HIGH SERVICE PUMP #2 MOTOR -15-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 11 BREAKER PANEL BOX -8-yrs Needed for operations 0% Catastrophic 13 MASTER FIRE PUMP CONTROL PANEL 8 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Catastrophic 18 GROUND STORAGE TANK 12 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Catastrophic 19 COPELAND GROUND STORAGE TANK 15 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Catastrophic 28 WELL 6 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 29 WELL 7 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Catastrophic 32 MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH 22 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Catastrophic 35 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 27 -yrs Needed for operations 09/. Catastrophic 2 AMMONIUM SULFATE INJECTOR 718 -yrs Necessary For compliance 0% Major 6 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE INJECTOR 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 12 MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH (TRANSFORMER) -8-yrs Needed for operations 0% Major 14 TRANSFORMER -8-yrs Needed for operations 0% Major 15 CL2 DRUM 3 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 16 EFFLUENT METER 8 -yrs Necessaryforcompliance 0% Major 17 EFFLUENT SAMPLE TAP 12 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 20 AMMONIUM SULFATE FEED TOTE 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 21 AMMONIUM SULFATE SKID 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 100% Major 22 ANTI-SCALANT FEED TOTE 17 -yrs Necessary -for compliance 0% Major 23 ANTI-SCALANTSKID 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 100% Major 24 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FEED DRUM 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 25 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SKID 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 100% Major 26 SULFURIC ACID FEED DRUM 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 65 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy Criticality+ 27 SULFURIC ACID SKID 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 100% Major 30 GENERATOR 22 -yrs Necessary For 0% Major 31 GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH 22 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 33 PROPANETANK 22 -yrs Necessary for complianceM/—.—Major 34 BREAKER PANEL 27 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Major 36 R.O. SKID 27 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 37 WTP GENERATOR 27 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 38 WTP GENERATOR FUEL TANK 27 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 39 WTP GENERATOR TRANSFER SWITCH 27 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Major 40 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (effluent) 28 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 41 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (influent) -28-yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 42 EFFLUENT FLOW TRANSMITTER 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 43 HSP 1MOTOR 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 44 HSP 1 PUMP 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 45 HSP 2MOTOR 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 46 HSP 2 PUMP -18-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 47 JOCKEY PUMP 1 MOTOR 18 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 48 JOCKEY PUMP 1 PUMP -18-yrs Necessaryforcompliance 50% Moderate 49 JOCKEY PUMP 2 MOTOR -18-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 50 JOCKEY PUMP 2PUMP -18-yrs Necessaryfor compliance 50% Moderate 51 PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE -18-yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 52 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1MOTOR -18-yrs Necessary For compliance 50% Moderate 53 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 PUMP 218 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate ---50--Moderate 54 FILTER HOUSING 1A -15-yrs Necessary for compliance 55 FILTER HOUSING 15 -15-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 56 FILTER HOUSING 2A 15 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 57 FILTER HOUSING 2B -15-yrs Necessaryforcompliance 50% Moderate 58 ALCONOX CLEANER 2 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 59 CL -17 REAGENT SET 2 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 60 DPD COMPOUND -2-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 61 PH BUFFER SET 2 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 65 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 66 Asset Remaii nng Useful Life- Importance Redundancy ! Criticality 62 PH ELECTRODE STORAGE SOLUTION -2-yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 63 SULFURIC ACID SOLUTION -2-yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 64 TURBIDITY STANDARDS 2 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 65 SPARE FILTER ELEMENTS 2 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Moderate 66 SPARE GENERATOR FILTERS 2 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Moderate 67 AMMONIUM SULFATE DAY TANK 3 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 68 AMMONIUM SULFATE STORAGE DRUM 31rs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 69 CL2 PUMP 1 3 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 70 CL2 PUMP 2 3 -yrs Necessary for compliance 500/o Moderate 71 FLOW ToTALIZERISIGNAL GENERATOR 3 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 72 NH3 PUMP 1 3 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 73 LAMOTTE CL2 METER 7 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 74 MAGNETIC SAMPLE STIRRER 7 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 75 MYRONCONDUCTIVITY MET ER 7 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 76 USA BLUEBOOK CL2 METER 7 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 77 6"BUTTERFLY VALVE(@ pressure control valve) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 016 Moderate 78 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 1 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 79 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 80 8" BUTTERFLY VALVE 3 (diesel pump) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 81 8" CHECK VALVE (diesel pump) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 82 EFFLUENT PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 83 OCV GATE VALVE 1 12 -yrs Needed for operations 500/. Moderate 84 OCV GATE VALVE 2 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 85 PRESSURE CONTROL INLET BUTTERFLY VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 86 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2MOTOR 12 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 87 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 PUMP 12 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 88 AUTO -DIALER (PRESSURE) 13 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 89 CHEMICAL FEED SPARE PARTS 17 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Moderate 90 HACH 1720E TUBIDIMETER 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 91 HACH APA 6000 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 66 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 67 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy Criticality 92 HACH CL -17 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 93 HACH SC200 TURBIDITY/CONDUCTIVITY METER 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 94 OAKTON PC 700 METER 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Moderate 95 SAMPLE WATER FLOW INDICATOR 17 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Moderate 96 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE DRUM 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 97 SPARE HIGH SERVICE PUMP 17 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Moderate 98 SPARE PULSAFEEDER CHEM PUMPS 17 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Moderate 99 TELEMETRY ANTENNA 22 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 100 TELEMETRY PANEL 22 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 101 AIRPORT BLACKFLOW PREVENTER 33 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 102 COURTHOUSE BACKFLOW 1 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 01/, Moderate 103 COURTHOUSE BACKFLOW 2 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 104 EVERGLADES ISLE BACKFLOW 1 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 105 EVERGLADES ISLE BACKFLOW 2 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 106 HAMILTON'S FISH HOUSE BACKFLOW 1 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 107 HAMILTON'S FISH HOUSE BACKFLOW 2 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 108 PARTER'S COVE BACKFLOW 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 109 THE ESTUARY BACKFLOW 1 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 110 THE ESTUARY BACKFLOW 2 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 111 THE ESTUARY BACKFLOW 3 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 112 WWTP BACKFLOW 1 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 113 WWTP BACKFLOW 2 33 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 114 EFFLUENT METER INLET GATE VALVE 43 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 115 EFFLUENT METER OUTLET GATE VALVE 43 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Moderate 116 2" WTP RPZ BACKFLOW 47 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Moderate 117 24 HR CHART RECORDER -23-yrs Abandoned 0% Insignificant 118 ANALOG FLOW METER -23-yrs Abandoned 0% Insignificant 119 FLOW CHART RECORDER -23-yrs Abandoned 0% Insignificant 120 EMERGENCY EYEWASH/SHOWER -18-yrs Needed for Health/Safety 0% Insignificant 121 RUBBER BOOTS 2 -yrs Needed for asset maintenance 100% Insignificant 122 RUBBER COVERALLS 2 -yrs Needed for maintenance 100% Insignificant 67 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 F. Remaining Asset Importance Redundancy ;Criticality Useful Life 123 RUBBER GLOVES 2 -yrs Needed for asset 100% Insignificant maintenance 124 CL21PH AUTO -SAMPLER 3 -yrs Abandoned 0% Insignificant 125 PAN ELVIEW 600 3 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Insignificant 126 112" IMPACT WRENCH 7 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 127 CENTURY LINK MODEM 7 -yrs Needed for 0% Insignificant communications 128 FIRST AID KIT 7 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Insignificant 129 FORTI WIFI 30D 7 -yrs Needed for 0% Insignificant communications 130 HAMMER DRILL 7 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 131 SAWZALL 7 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 132 50 GAL WATER HEATER 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Insignificant 133 EMERGENCY EYEWASHISHOWER STATION #1 17 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 50% Insignificant 134 EMERGENCY EYEWASHISHOWER STATION #2 17 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 50% Insignificant 135 EMERGENCY EYEWASHISHOWER STATION #3 17 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 50% Insignificant 136 FACE SHIELD 17 -yrs Needed for asset 100% Insignificant maintenance 137 MOTORIZED PALLET JACK 17 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 138 WELL 6 SECURITY LIGHT 17 -yrs Needed for security of 50% Insignificant assets 139 WELL 7 SECURITY LIGHT 17 -yrs Needed for security of 50% Insignificant assets 140 114,3/8,112" CRAFTSMAN SOCKET SET 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 141 314" CRAFTSMAN SOCKET SET 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 142 5 FT MOBILE STAIRS (GRAY) 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 143 7 FT MOBILE STAIRS (YELLOW) 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 144 BLUE STORAGE CABINET 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 145 PALLET JACK 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 146 YELLOW STORAGE CABINET 27 -yrs Needed for asset 50% Insignificant maintenance 147 CRAFTSMAN ROLLAWAY TOOLBOX 47 -yrs Needed for asset 0% Insignificant maintenance 148 WELL 6 CHAINLINK FENCE 47 -yrs Needed for security of 50% Insignificant assets 149 WELL 7 CHAINLINK FENCE 47 -yrs Needed for security of 50% Insignificant assets F. Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 69 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy Criticality 150 WTP CHAINLINK FENCE 47 -yrs Needed for security of assets 0% Insignificant 151 JOCKEY PUMP FLOW METER (BOTH) -23-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 152 EFFLUENT PRESSURE GAUGE -18-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 153 HSP 2 INLET PSI GAUGE 18 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 154 HSP 2 OUTLET PSI GAUGE -18-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 155 HSP HOA SWITCHES -18-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 156 JP HOA SWITCHES -18-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 157 OCV PRESSURE GAUGE 48 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 158 RP HOA SWITCHES -18-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 159 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 1A 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50°/a Minor 160 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 1B -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 161 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 2A -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 162 FILTER INLET PSI GAUGE 2B 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 163 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 1A -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 164 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 1 B -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 165 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 2A -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 166 FILTER OUTLET PSI GAUGE 2B -15-yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 167 HSP METER -15-yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Minor 168 HSP PRESSURE GAUGE -15-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 169 OLD WELL PUMP -15-yrs Needed for backup 100% Minor 170 CL2 ROOM FAN 7 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 0% Minor 171 AIRPORT METER 3" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 172 AIRPORT METER 6" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 173 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 1" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 174 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 2" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 175 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 8" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 176 PARTNER'S COVE METER 2" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 177 PARTNER'S COVE METER 8" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 178 THE ESTUARY METER 3" 4 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 179 THE ESTUARY METER 314" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 180 WWTP METER 2" -2-yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 181 CL2 PSI GAUGE 3 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 182 HP Z230 COMPUTER 7 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 69 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 70 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy Criticality 183 VIEWSONIC 22" MONITOR 7 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 184 6 FT PERIMETER FENCE 12 -yrs Needed for security of assets 0% Minor 185 DIESEL PUMP COOL ING WATER GATE VALVE 2 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 186 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER AIR RELIEF VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 187 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 188 DIESEL PUMP COOLING WATER GATE VALVE 1 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 189 HSP 1 AIR RELIEF VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 190 HSP 1 CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 191 HSP 1 INFLUENT GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 192 HSP 1&1 EFFLUENT VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 193 HSP 2 CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 500/6 Minor 194 HSP 2 EFFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 195 HSP 2 INFLUENT BUTTERFLY VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 196 HSP EFFLUENT GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 197 JOCKEY PUMP 1 EFFLUENT GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 198 JOCKEY PUMP 1 INFLUENT GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 199 JOCKEY PUMP 1 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 200 JOCKEY PUMP 2 BUTTERFLY VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 500% Minor 201 JOCKEY PUMP 2 CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 202 JOCKEY PUMP 2 EFFLUENT GATE VALVE --f2-yrs 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 203 JOCKEY PUMP 2 INFLUENT GATE VALVE Needed for operations 50% Minor 204 JOCKEY PUMP 2 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 205 JOCKEY PUMP INFLUENT GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 206 JOCKEY PUMP OUTLET GATE VALVE (BOTH) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 207 PRESSURE CONTROL OUTLET BUTTERFLY VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 208 PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 209 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 210 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 INLET GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 211 RECIRCULATION PUMP 1 OUTLET GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 212 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 CHECK VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 213 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2INLET GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 214 RECIRCULATION PUMP 2 OUTLET GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 215 RECIRCULATION PUMP INLET BUTTERFLY VALVE(BOTH) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 216 RECIRCULATION PUMP OUTLET GATE VALVE 12 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 70 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 71 Asset Remaining Useful Life Importance Redundancy Criticality 217 RECIRCULATION PUMP PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE(BOTH) 12 -yrs Needed for operations 509/b Minor 218 FILTER EFFLUENT METER 15 -yrs Necessary for compliance 0% Minor 219 FILTER GATE VALVE #1 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 220 FILTER GATE VALVE #2 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 221 FILTER GATE VALVE #3 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 222 FILTER GATE VALVE #4 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 223 FILTER GATE VALVE #5 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 224 HSP #1 CHECK VALVE 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 225 HSP #1 ISOLATION VALVE 75 ---yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 226 HSP FILTER BYPASS BUTTERFLY VALVE 1 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 227 HSP FILTER BYPASS BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 228 JOCKEY PUMP 1 CHECK VALVE 15 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 229 CEILING FAN (BIG ONE) 17 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 500% Minor 230 DESK FAN 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 231 FRONT EXHAUST FAN 17 -yrs Needed for Health/Safety 50% Minor 232 LARGE REFRIGERATOR 17 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 233 PS 1 ON/OFF MERCURY SWITCH 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 234 PS 2 LOW PSI SWITCH 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 235 REAR EXHAUST FAN 17 -yrs Needed for HealthlSafety 50% Minor 236 SMALL REFRIGERATOR 17 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 237 WELL 6 FLOW METER 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Minor 238 WELL 6 METER BYPASS 17 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 239 WELL 7 FLOW METER 17 -yrs Necessary for compliance 50% Minor 240 WELL 7 METER BYPASS 17 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 241 WTP AIC AIR HANDLER 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 242 WTP AIC UNIT 17 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 243 PARKWAY RV PARK FLUSH STAND 1 27 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 244 PARKWAY RV PARK FLUSH STAND 2 27 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 245 SMALLWOOD STORE FLUSH STAND 27 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 246 EFFLUENT METER BYPASS GATE VALVE 43 -yrs Needed for operations 0% Minor 247 HSP 1 FILTER EFFLUENT VALVE 47 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 248 HSP 2 FILTER EFFLUENT VALVE 47 -yrs Needed for operations 50% Minor 71 Everglades City Asset Management Plan APPENDIX B 4/25/2017 Short Lived Asset Inventory (Estimated Repair, Rehab, Replacement Expenses by Item within up to 20 Years from Installation) SHORT-LIVED ASSETS Asset Adjusted Useful Life Remaining Useful Life Condition 1 DIESEL PUMP BATTERIES (2) 5 -yrs -5-yrs Good 2 ALCONOXCLEANER 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 3 CL -17 REAGENT SET 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 4 DPD COMPOUND 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 5 PH BUFFER SET 5 - yrs 2 -yrs Excellent I PH ELECTRODE STORAGE SOLUTION 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 7 J RUBBER BOOTS 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 8 RUBBER COVERALLS 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 9 RUBBER GLOVES 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 11 SPARE FILTER ELEMENTS 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 11 SPARE GENERATOR FILTERS 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Fair (Average) 12 SULFURIC ACID SOLUTION 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 19 TURBIDITY STANDARDS 5 -yrs 2 -yrs Excellent 14 ANALOG FLOW METER 10 -yrs -28-yrs 15 HSP 2 INLET PSI GAUGE 10 -yrs -28-yrs Good 11 CL2 ROOM FAN 10 -yrs -7-yrs 17 1/2" IMPACT WRENCH 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 11 CENTURY LINK MODEM 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 19 FIRST AID KIT 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Excellent 21 FORTI WIFI 30D 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 21 HAMMER DRILL 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair Average) 22 HP Z230 COMPUTER 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 23 LAMOTTE CL2 METER 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average 24 MAGNETIC SAMPLE STIRRER 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 25 MYRON CONDUCTIVITY METER 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair Average) 21 SAWZALL 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 72 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Asset Adjusted Useful Life Remaining Useful Life Condition 27 USA BLUEBOOK CL2 METER 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 28 VIEWSONIC 22" MONITOR 10 -yrs 7 -yrs Fair (Average) 29 24 HR CHART RECORDER 15 -yrs -23-yrs 30 FLOW CHART RECORDER 15 -yrs -23-yrs 31 JOCKEY PUMP FLOW METER (BOTH) 15 -yrs -23-yrs Good 32 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (influent) 15 -yrs -23-yrs Good 33 AMMONIUM SULFATE INJECTOR 15 -yrs -23-yrs Good 34 AIRPORTMETER3" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 35 AIRPORT METER 6" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 35 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 1" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 37 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 2" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 38 EVERGLADES ISLE METER 8" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair Average 39 PARTNER'S COVE METER 2" 15- rs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 40 PARTNER'S COVE METER 8" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 41 THE ESTUARY METER 3" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 42 THE ESTUARY METER 3/4" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) 43 W WTP METER 2" 15 -yrs -2-yrs Fair (Average) EFFLUENT METER 15 -yrs 8 -yrs Good Most of the components in this category are short-lived assets and are regularly budgeted for. Maintenance, repair, and replacement occurs more frequently and is to be expected during the course of day -in and day -out operations for any water system. 73 Everglades City Asset Management Plan APPENDIX C PROJECTED FINANCIAL BUDGET Expenses for Everglades City Year: 2017 ANNUAL WATER EXPENSES 4/25/2017 Reg. Salaries and Wages $106,000.00 FICA Payroll Tax $ 8,250.00 Insurance Emp/Life and Health $ 31,250.00 Worker's Compensation $19,925.00 Uniforms $ 2,155.00 Govt Fine -Water Dept. $1,000.00 Water Operating Expense $ 7,500.00 Water Lines and Supplies $ 7,250.00 Engineering $ 20,000.00 Cont Ser Plant Operator $ 73,160.00 Cont Ser Meter Reader $ 6,000.00 Telephone $ 1,950.00 Postage $ 1,705.00 Water Test and Analytical $12,000.00 Electric Water Plant Co $ 74,325.00 Rentals and Leases -Equip $ 2,500.00 Insurance General $ 28,000.00 Misc Supplies $ 4,000.00 Equip Repair and Mainten $ 5,500.00 City Barn Construction Project $ 500.00 Janitorial Supply $ 2,000.00 Office Supplies $ 450.00 Misc Expense $ 1,000.00 Fuel and Lubricants $ 9,000.00 Parts and Supplies $ 7,500.00 Chemicals, Water Plant $ 20,310.00 Equipment Expense $ 3,515.00 Data Processing Equip Water $1,000.00 Garbage Collection $ 4,500.00 Transfers Out Debt Serve $38,856.00 Total Operating Expenses $ 501,101 74 Everglades City Asset Management Plan DEBT PAYMENT / SYSTEM RESERVES 4125/2417 Asset Management 0&M $10,327.00 Capital Improvements Program Reserve 7.5% $ 37,600.00 Recommend 7.5% of Annual Budget for funding infrastructure repair & replacement projects (Asset Mgmt). Funds set aside in a separate account. Major Capital Improvement Program as needed for major items $564,290.00 Contingency / Emergency Reserve 7.5% $ 37,600.00 Recommend 7.5% of Annual Budget for funding 3+ months of utility operations for emergencies/hurricanes. Funds set aside in a separate account. Total Debt Payment and System Funded Reserves $ 649,817 TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES $1,150,918 Revenue for Everglades City Year: 2017 ANNUAL WATER REVENUES Water Charges -Monthly Ser $ 451,550.00 Water Meter Charge $ 650.00 Water Meter Reconnect Fee $ 9,800.00 Dock Water $ 33,050.00 Water Hookup Fee $ 32,050.00 Utility Tax W/S (50%) $17,021.00 Utilities Penalties (50%) $ 7,764.00 Total Annual Income $ 551,885 75 v rn P U 0 m �y p p m T -n m D z m n n 0 0 2 2 O 7 O r r r � ^ x c) x G) x m A m m z m < r o 1- m i m -� m 1 m x c X�� C y C T. m T. m w w 2 x -n 2 2 frn r m y 3 m e A :a � cn m n zp m > j -< m m m -0 � co m m c m c m 2 2 2 2 m c7 co z .'[1 O'a m m<< N --� m D m m m cCD m z O m Z Kpn��r m -° M r c c c c c c n A D m m o mn mm m Q Li m m Gzi ° -u m v ° �° z a p m m D m D y m O c c m m p z �- m o A r n x C m m a m O m x O a m m r k a m to in i» to i» [n i» t» in in in in t -n to ei to tri en <» in i» r N N W W W W W A (T Ui CP (l1 CM1 Ui Ut 0 0 O O O O O N a n 0 N W r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O .mss d A W W W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W w W W W W D W (P Cli Ch (T (T Ut 00 do 01 W W 07 N CA 00 N 00 00 W 01 W LO m A 3 S i i i i i d fA kn Hi E9 69 iA f9 ifl iA EA Hi iA ifl iii ifl N N N N N T N N W W W W W A Ui U1 N (Ti (h (P Vi 0 0 0 O O O O -( O O Ui O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O V O 69 iA iA iii ifl {ii lw in EH fA iA EH Hi iA 1A fH iii ip iA vi iA E9 T O N Ui N N (P N O W m (NJi N� (NJt (NJi O O QO] O O O O� b9 iA ifl ip Hi Iii to N 14fA iii ifl Hi 1Wifl ifl fA fA lfl. lfl iia 'In -n O N (T (]i CJt N (T O O O UNt N (NIi N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U1 O O O O p O J J O O O O O O O J O O O O fA to 69 Iii ifl ifl fag 4A i9 iN iA {A Vi iA iii lwip iA iA iA. to iA T O N en (ll m (T O O O N N N N CNli O O m O O O O N O UN O O O O O O J J O O O O O O O J O O O O O O O O O Hi b9 Vi ifl iA iA ifl ifl iA bi ifl iR iii bi to iA EA £9 W lf/ Vi 69 T ON (.il (li (Ji (li N O O to (Nfi UNl (N)t fNJi (NJi O O O O O O j O m o 0 0 0 0 o J J O O O O O O O J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P U 0 'o m� C D m 2 x A O m cn A N -n n m y r -r m x x D A -G O i m -i m -i N C C A K C to N O n m A m A m M A-0 c c m m A m= z m m m A y c m z A O_ A O_ A m (� A Z m -i v -G C z -I A A r C 7 0 z c z c z A= x x �i m e --n m 0 { _= C� m- mm umi D D D R m r0 A D z� 2 c m W m m D -n m C y -I � -rmi to cn O D Z C r r{ rSrl m m m -j � r Z a* -4 -p C � � (n O Z W (A T � �_ Ln Ln - 0 - m � � D� --i x m m `G -Di m y m m m 6 G � D m m m m O O m ova C D D D x z x z z m m z x A n ;* � O D C D C C m m A cn Z = '� A A -i W G C +) C � (� tmi) � m fn Z j m '�] O 0 m m m m m m � p O O 70 A A O o o N C W Y v( O A m A A A K V ID 0 vi 69 b9 fi) U) 69 69 69 lil a 'Lo '69 N N N N N l�J� U N J N N N N N N O O O O U U U U O O O U 0 0 0 O O 3 0 0 0 0 0 ;u0 0An 0 lowcm, wN N N N W N N --� > -� N -+ N(O U U W 00 00 J O] O] O] W W 00 O� CO 6] U U OJ W W W 00 OJ � N m 7 ------------- V w to fi3 4H N 69 N {ii N 69 N fit N 69 N N N N N N U N (�I� O O O O U U U U O O O U O O U O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v to �� j b9 69 fii fA fA 69 N N N N N W W T (UT p U 0 W U U U U 00 W U U W W W O W O DD fA 69 to 69 f-!) {fl 69 69 iii N N Vii N N N N W W' W W W O W O y 'A14 EA 69 69 69 69 69 fi! EA 69 fii 69 fii 4A b9 fii 69 < lfl 69 1fl 69 -.9ffl N N N U N N N N W W -4 -A W W W O W O (ill (�li O U O W U U U U 00 W U U W W W O W O N 0 f!) fii EA{ -A 69 w fA 69 fi) ffl 69 69 ffi 69 V3 fii fii b9 { 69 <19 w N N U N N N N W W WW WW O WW O U U U O U O W U U U U w W U U W O O N � 9 r D D m n ? p m m N m z z O D m (j) r -rl N x m I o c c '� u v � m c m N N z v p- p w K �' �' m O x Z c C C U x n ^' S r r D m z m m m c Z- A z m m D '_-I -� -p (� o In Z -I w N N c m m oo ;U m r -I r m r m r �+� m n r N X mDr m y -o < m n m m mi m m m -i m w Z p G) m c m N C C c p p 1 to c '� '= CD ;s c D D m m 1 c° r m m co x v cn -o v m m p m n D pp m�7 O m r m c m N m o p A [n ° N 3 0 -1 D m m m L7 G) D O, r z c om m 0 Cl) o .n cn c c -DC O f ro f m cn m D G) c C) c x D D m m ? m D c G) m m m m °o r m y h m C) m m W DCD a CD Sii fA t1 v3 N w G�9 V) O. w c�fl (�Jl cin -�'' [n rn to Sn V) rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 3 m �1 n O N m D N (n Ui N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 epi d n W W W W J 4 J V J V V V V V V W W W W W W W W W W W W D to OJ M W m SJi Cn (n N V V V V W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N j to to to [n tv to [n to to Sn � Sfl [N(00nJ� t0NC0on [0NC0nT C -4 -,j SbNCtN(NflOO03 N{WWWWWWfl1 {EWWWwWWi9i SoOOOOfi V6JVO1i 69 WWfin co 16AAAfl9 VSAAAfl3 4f(N(N(NflAOOO GEWWWWWWAY ltWWWWWWo� ESOWJVWflas S[WWW St0N(0AoJt 1-0 1-0 lw T O m m O0O00O St0y9o St0ioa Sc0�A 1S»0i3 Vt0oi Ve0ni V J J Wtm 0 0 0 0 0 Op S!3 Si3 Sii fA Sfl Sfl Sii 69 Vi Sii 119 to 4A wi 1fl Sia yy to 69 Sfl 4A Sii Vi A A fND (Np Ul (TI Cn N cn m (Nn 0 0 0 0 N 0 SA w EA Vi (y4 S!1 69 1fl. Vi Sfl 'co w iii fY EA Sag Ey EA 4n. {fl G9 EH -n A A (Np CN41 Ul U1 Cn N U CNJI UNi N Ncn 0 0 0 0 N r Al N O� Cf),D m m O Cl m 0 T m v y v co m �A C= 0 { m "n z -�-� m - m ' (_/) .m � .�1 0 —I — i v m m m -n —I m� m W m T O U7 0 n C m -< 2 In x W m Z m O M O c m -n Z z m o c r r �, c c n C c rD -0 m — n c m ZO w n A C C m n T r -I -I G< c N D 3 c° z Z c rf mmm G1 7 m x1 C� O< x m c N yID m�: j r i m < A A� T D� 0 0 —0 z D M 0 M 1 m� Z d Z G O oo m m z°< m ,i r m O z N m CR) m r� G Z m O 0 •° Z -�-� G� `w m -< -< m < < c o ( m x m '9 Z ? y e m m G D m<< m m m G) r m m CD v W y a m m v m T �" (p7 r < m m r N� D r n m ° m A co G O- r r- r y a N m m N --� < < m m Oa Z N 'a o o D --� Z r<<< -< -< -G CD m N D -� c 3 C z z w m mi> y> G m �' c a m < m m 0 °a O 0- mmm iA to ifl. £9 b9 iii iA fA Ki ffl s�v to in to it3 N in N in W t» W vi A in A in N vi W w W in W iii r m d m m m m m m m m m m _ _ _ O M A O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O o N O O p N p N O N o O 0 0 o 0 p p p p p o (70 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o O o 3 m A p C) n 0 rn A !. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O CD 7 n W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m W m W m W m W m W m W m J W f0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N N N s N N N N N s N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o v r3 '"` �• N � 7 ifl 4fi iA iA Iii EA lfl 4A vi EH. ifl fA EA 1fl ------------ iA iA fN Hi ifl iA iA � vi (Nn lcn yi T N m m m m m m m m m m m m N m 0 CNO tN0 W W m 0 p A O J J J J J J J J J W W W N J m N N W W J M W 00 v O N 69 SA iA iii iii W ifl w iii 69fA fA IW iA H3 1&9iA Hi fA T iA N EA { N m m m m m m m m m m m m N m 0 (NO (NO W W m O J J J J J J J J J W W W N J m N N W W J J o o O iA Hi iA ifl ifl iA ifl iA EA EA Iii £Affl fA to tii ifl -9iA iA iA A iA N U3 �. N m m m m m m m m m m m m N m 0 (NO (NO W W m p p p .+ J J J -,J J J J W W W (P J m N N W W J 0 0 O iA di 4A iii Hi ifl w ifl {fl iA to ffl iii W 469 N N N W W A ifl N m m m m m m m m m m m m W W O J J J J J J J J J W W WW W W N N J O iA Hi fA ifi Iii iA ifl iA #fl iA ifl EA fig E9 ifl iA 49 ifl fA iA iii Pi (NP Ly N m m m m m m m m m m m m N m 0 (NO (NO W W m 0 _ O J J J J J J J O Al N 9 L m m n m 0 L L L L mt C/) m m m n Q o o 0 o n o N m r c c m rn 0 n 0 n A m m m I c C rr D D cc c(n Dc r c c c c v �O T -< Z D m --o -� -i �m �� m� 0D 4�� D c c c c c 3 v <N A r mnGZGzX0m O O m mm <� D--ip<-�pG-po0<m<m<�<mG'a�--. D� -i D -i >m omoD-u M O r, -um0-nnr0mzD0mzDOocD-�D-Dm rz rZ rz--�-�rmr rzrmr DNDNw 11) mm �- D� m�m� j -I r0 -C.Z <z mm < Dc mm < Dc m�2rmmmZmmmmmz� -i (M cn m T r Z <0 'D 'O < Zo D0 <� DA ,-, C m� r « c E r <E c � m m m r m c< m N -u Cr r0 Om mN m my -Q O m m m c rc c m m m mc0 mZ 2c n Z 1 z Z 0 C m D O O 0 .Zj �r O O m � m m n m c7 D D -Di D D m D y D -I � m i m r m --i m m m -i m � m m m CD K in in iii N N En O Hi m Eli O in m {n m En m 63 m ifl m fn m in m in m b9 m in -11 C, O 0 O o O O O o O 0 O 0 O o O O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 m O 0 ,�„ =� CD X 0 0 N � m a N O N O N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A r d W W W m W W W m W m W W W m W 60 W m W 00 W N W Oo W 00 W 00 W m W co W m W m N N N N N N N N N N s N N N m N N N N N N N r3 7 O Ey. en Hi A In A 69 N in N 19 N En N in N En N in N En N En N in N in N EA in m W m N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O v in A in A to N to N tii N in N in N [» N i» N in N as N to N in N to in W W m N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 W ifl A bi A iA N in N {n N : N to N 69 N iA N iii N E9 N in N ifl N bi N fA T N O !fl A ifi A EA N EA N fn N iii N in N {n N fA N fA N 69 N En N {fl N iA N fA N m m W N N O O O O O O O O O O O o O N O in En 69 N in N Fs N N N N N N Fo F�s iflA N NO O O O O O o O N 0 m O 2 Cl) 2` v p -po m O O p c7 of O D D m m m m m 7T < n_ Z m �n C D C r r r r r r --i r -1 m -< -i m W 'D D, O r r r T mC r Z Z O -I -i -1 -i m m m r r Fn c d -xC in c c A x x A� 'mA � � m f x Y x� 1 D� m v m 0 G7 O O G7 O 0 D 03 D-mG v� O O m n'o m° mx ? GO <> � O D c7 cn D -I -DI Di D � rvrm C m Z 'A T.p Gp <p cn rD-� Drm°' C') D c m m m m m <D<D > p GO DO DO D< e <Ao r Z p r< G<< G m co N�>W m cn O m 0 � �l D p rr r 0 Gr r 0 <r m K m m cn—m o p p D D D D Z m?< -i m Gz mz mZ Wv cn a cn Cl) `i m m m m < c c 0 A D O cn m 0 N -� p m 0 -a c mooch xk � I IcMG�c m gy=m m o o cn h cn w N -' m A � 0 >* D m m � m m -Dj m OO m yv A � rCD < < Z m m T A N N N N 4A 4fl 4A 4fl � N W W m 4fl 4p &3 ffl SA d 0 0 0 0 0 M 00 O O m OO 4fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O C) O O O O O O W 0 0 0 0 O o p O N ' K N N N N m CM1 U (P Ctl m N m C1� (li CT U� W CP N (Ji (.h Ui m r 7 K m N V 00 m m W m W N N N N CSS m CJS Ui �. V V W V tl1 N 0 N N Vt N N fT N m N W N N N N N N 3 vi 4A 4fl 4fl iii 444WWiifli 4WEWflA 44Wflfl 4vWWAi 4f9 ILA NoNO NW 444AflA {44AAflR 4iO f4V0 EllmmNiAf13 W W4Wfl W W J m >T mJJ VC)W 1.9 fl 4A 460 4fl 69 'E" to 4fl 0) 1.9 T J W A m mmAA0 s'7�C1 J J J J mm w00 fl A 4flfl 4A 'In 4AN 0 fl 3 W WW vWm NE44Afl AW m m m O m J 49 4fl 49 694n 4A 4A ' 4fl A W W W j. W W W W W W 4 � o W A A J m J m J m J m m O J 49 4A EA 4A 4A 4fl fA Ui 4A 4A > 4fl N 4fl N ' W H3 4A Hi 4fi 4fi 4A ( T W W W W CA W m W 0) W m OO W N A A A 0o m 3 m ' J m J m J m J m m J E m Cl) coO D D m m m D z S O m m m m m `2 cn N Oz r _n o o 0 m r m m A `^ in C c F F O m o z z z r J r m m O m m z 2 0 �o r� _m z ,ZDj z (n n f,) n p7 0 (n (n m bm D c m m -n m D DtmnD m c m n m= N m J rn CA m n r n n D m m D X m 1{-i-G�{ m'� m m D O m m x c=- b D c c m b z y x O m 3 m p m m m m m m m O 0-. 0� r -n -n -i 'o 2] A m C D z� z�� z� c A = Chi A D ° v c O m m m -i =fn A W 0 C (n D w D D 'u Q' cn m In z C Z r m '� 2.1, A :0 mO mo -n C� G cn n cn rn m m m r r yT1 2 0 m m 2 2 1 1 '{D fm b m m m a m 0 p m 0 m m z D z m m in m rn D D m m -o m m m o m X 2 2 m 2 w c cn D n mm m m -n 7 = oo cv m m - C m -a K [» tj69 E9 In in in fn in fn En infn A ffl A 69 A lfi in Vi ifl ifl [» {n r W Cl N N N N N N N J J J A N N N N (n (p O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' O N N N O O O O. 0 0 0 0 0 0= X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;u n m N N N N N N N N N IV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r d 7 n W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W (D CD V V V V V J V V V V N V -4 V V V V V V V 4 V V V V V. V V 7 wm N N W N N N N A A N N N N N N 'fl { W N N W W O (D (fl O (O (O A A A N CWJI (WJi (W11 A .WP A A WWN k9 {ii lwN N W N N 169 A A A T (A (A (P W. CA O CO N CD t0 O co O A A A cWJi CWJC N N .OP A A A W W � f0 W W W W W W W A � �P. 'En t9 iii Vi Vi kn T W W W W (O W CO (D tD CO O A W W (Wn (Wli A A A A W W � W W W W W W W? A A N {Y N iA N to N 1fl N li3 N iii N lw '69 di T { m W m W N W W (O CD CO (D (D (p O A A A W N (WT UWi A A A A W W Ni to vi' in iii in En {A Ni in N to '� N N in N in bi iii ifl in in T { W W W m W � A N N N N W W CND CND CND (ND (ND CND (ND 41. A N N 0 mi m w o- J -u 'a 0 O D z m z�pp n � D r m 'A W m m --ni m O m Drn o m m" �_ p n ',� mi �O m o O Z m m m m m O o N z -I cn W Z z '� D Z D m G7 r T --i O D W -i r m m �:Un y m C� z z Z M m m n m O y m D�Dm m r- 0 O O cn m M � O m O z a m c m m m z m m m m 0 w r M r D �� mT m -i v m- z -iz m --)i z m o rn n x cn ^' I o m z �� mmmx D m m ai D xA Or 0 D v m y m O cn-0 - Z O > n n � C z m .� n D A A m O A a mi m z D W m z x m m m o cn cn O� zmr O i to y ox cc o A m �m A o m i m =70 cn m K v NHi fn en <B f� t� m C"' N �; a fn O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p O p 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O a p O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p oCD O f7 O N M K CJi Ui W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N N( r O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 n D J -41W W W W W w W W W W W W W Oa O) mW W co W W W W Mw W A A N N NN N N N N N. N K) V N -I N -4 N N N N N N N N N -1 V V -4 N WV J W V V -I -4 V V -1 V V oCJ ifl b9 ffl EA ffl ffl 4A SA -CAT W N 69 N W N W t0 (D (O CO (O W N N O J O N N N N m W> O O m A W W v ffl EA N fi) Efl wfA fit fA EA W 69 W N? iA fA <A to T N W N w (O CO (O [D w J N ru co J O Ch N A (Ji A Ui N W N00 m W W p O O) A a ffl Ffl {-q ifl fi) f -A ffl ---------------- 4A b9 W W ffl fn (a N N Vi f9169 f� G N N W (O CO (O (O (O > J N N CDw J O A Ui A Cn .A (h W N Obi W ai W > O (D 0) a A w co ffl to fH fA ffl 4A 1w E9 fA > W co N (19 Wi ffl En T N W N W CO CO (O (O CO v N fJ J A N A Cn A N cAii N OOo N N O m W W G p O A W to EA to ffl fA fA to to ifl W N W En N (fl tsi f!i A Cl) yIn EA f 4A w N N > > J Q IV J N? N A cn .p N en U) 0o N N W W m W Q) N W A N N 0 N A N 0 a m x n m E NN�mmCi) D D ZO W 0 0 2 2 U m Fn M --i M C J 2 2 n ? 3 m m m �� Ds D m ti N T cn -n S x z, m 3 U)O z 0 m ? x A N <�0 -om -0 --0 CO c c �+`; Z m A m Oc �. X n m z m; z m T m D v m a OZ m D Z K� z 0 n n zc m m 'a D m o O m m m m m m O O 0o m 9 E G7 D r°n m c> m N M m o m ' m v c 0�� vn m� m c m c C) O Z m a ca O x N 1 m 0 0 2 O a p N ulcni n7 m' t' t' to o �' r m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 = 7J 3 Q0 o � � Q K 0 N K 0 0 0 0 En to to En t/i iii to n to b9 to 69 to r 0) N N P p 0 0 O O O O O (�D C �D W W W W W W W J CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O o 0 0 0(D� d n � -{ V V V V V V V W r3 � �• O 0 d f/I � 14 W EA 4n to m k W 0 W N N N N N N N W N N N N O r 1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d ? V V) to fn Vi N ti) N EA N N ti) n W W W W W W Tm� W � N D m m W W W N W W m m W W o V� J� N N T N {/1 N ? A to to to En to to to V J J N N N N W W N O N iA N j to 69 {n to 69 to 1 69 7 V J N N N 0) 0) W N V to 4A to En Vi to 69 to to f 0) to 4n to 0) O (P (J) U1 N UNi 0 0 O O O O N J J O O O O O O O J O O O O N ti) (_� to to {fl to b9 EA fn to 1.9 4B 1 i to -n m CA Ot (Nth ONi (N)) (Nle O o m O O o o N J J o 0 0 0 o O o J O O o 0 W --------------- O O O O to to fn G9 En {-() tof b9 t9 69 fn fn to T 0) m W U) fT N (Nle 0 0 O O O O N J --------------- J O O O O O O O J 0 0 0 0 A to to 69 to 69 to to ti) 69 {n to 69 to {n O) O N Ut N N N (T N G) N U) W O N O 6 Q) O O O O J J O O O O O O O J O O O O O O O O N V7 to to G9 fn to H) to to to fA to to to T 0) O) (NTi (Nll N ONi Ui O O O O O O O N J J O O O O O O O J O O O O O O O O A N 0 a x x n m NN�mmCi) C M m J m Dm Z n ? 3 m m c) 0 D � ti N T T D D r- z, m m m ? z <�0 n c c Z Z A m Oc �. X n m z m; z m T m D m a O z z 0 n o D D n O O m G G m m m G7 D r°n m m m O m ' x K n ulcni 169 m m' t' t' to o �' r m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 = 7J 3 Q0 o � � Q 0 N K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .mss m �D W W W W W W W J CD fD d � N � -{ V V V V V V V W r3 � �• O d o 0 14 W EA 4n to to N to N fn N to T (p l0 > J --4 W > V A ? V V) to fn Vi N ti) N EA N N ti) m A O J J O W � N V1 V� J� N N T N {/1 N ? A to to to En to to to V J J N N N N W W N O N iA to 69 {n to 69 to 1 69 V J N N N 0) 0) W N V > N A N 0 a W U C ----------------------- mm o m- -rn Cn m cc x x^ ^ n m m cn C C O O Cn. Cn A O D n -t 0 o 0 OT. m -n m m. m co ^* Cl) C r Z :0 x Z Z m m D C C O r r r r Cl) z u C) Z1 �nm m -i c 1 �b :0 'A n n r r m m r 'i -i --i c w 3 M nr m e o << O D o m m m m= O r- C/) n U) C m m m D D T o -n m m M n ^�. D A 'D O Z A x r C C m m 2 x x O z Cl) C 2 r T m a v 1 -I r z O '� r 0 0 0 0 0 -i C G O z w -i -I O C C m CO m C C G -� m C U7 C Cn C In C C/J m Z I 0 a m .Z_1 -i C N N m m � -- w n D A m co m m m n n K m m m m o o c z G7 z O z G7 z L7 x O a z m X z m m x x� O O m m r m m m U)m Cn z m= 0 0 m x c 0 m D ao D D o 0 01 m m ti ~ m x a m N) Vi N) N) V) jv 1y N) 1n r i N N) N 1n N Ns N N3 N 1n W 1n W N) W <» es W Ni A a Vi Ni N N3 N Vi N Ni N N CP CIt J N N N N 0 0 0 W 0 0 0= ;i 0 O 0 m 0 CP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Ro O 0 N x C r 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N (P (T O N O O O O O O O O O w 7 C7 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W D m J m m m m m m m co m N Cil m m m MF m m m 0N N m Ui m N i to to Ni V) Vi Ni V) w N) Vi N) Ni Vi N w Ni o to Ni 'm Vi 1f3 Ni Vi Vi N1 Vi N. "TS N N N (T N N N N W W J J W W W O W O o N CP (P N Cn U O N O N O W N (h Gi m W tll (Ji W W W O W O O (T O O O O O O N ICAN N N N N (Uy1 Ni m Ni Ni N3 Ni b3 H1 N1 Ni N m (�T N W W J J O mO W U N N N m W (P C3� W W W O W O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Ni V) ViNi N) Vi Nl V) V) Nl V3 Vi 1f3 V3 V) Vi Ni Ni Vi Ni N3 10 Ni 1-A N N NCT N N N N W W J J W W W O W C:, o N Cn (P Cn Cn U O N O N O W N N N N m W CP (Ji W W W O W O O CP 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ni Vi Vi Ni Ni Vi N1 Vi Vi Efl N3 V) Vi N/ Ni w Vi w w V3 Ni N) V> Ni N) N N N N CT N N N N W W J J W W W O W O O N Cn CT Cn m N O N O m O W N U N N m W CP CP W W W O W O O CP 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vt 69 V) Vi V3 Ni V) Ni N to Ni N) ---------------- Vi 'm V) N) Ni V3 Ni N3 1ii V3 N! Hi N ,� N N N CP N N N N W W J J W W W O W O O N CP CP N CT M O N O N O W N N Cn N m W CP CP W W W O W O O CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 Of C 0 T - -n '� T D O -7 '� (D 2 m m- m N M -ri r r -r-I r -r-I r E O X X D v� r Q m m 5 m� m m W N m< x � -i D O c m N z m 0 O O O m ozi C O z n n i m c m m n O - c z C z c z C z x x= 3 r Z w[) N D m z W A m p Z m m r -I r� r -I r m p 0 A m C m m cn r' m r m r m r m cn D D �' .- y m D m m .9 r G �1 m 'q m r m -i m m -i m -i m -i N C C C p m D O :U -1 � C -1 � -i - -0 C `< -° m O G) a m v Cl) m m -o W m W o p p D A m p �' e 0 m n A N 0) O m O O O O o z m m> c p c c 0 c G) c c G) c�� 6) Om O r mJ ai m f1l c m m N m N m m m m G) �°, .Z7 C m N m m N D D --` m W D D CD X m W N N !`� W to 2A 69 69(fin t9 6�9 b9 69 'U9 to69 69 69 E» C CSP �+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 3 0. 0 Q' A M n O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r W 0 n J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W D J J � N W W W W W W W N N N N N N j 69 t9 N 69 ffl 69 69 b9 t9 y) yi 69 69 t9 t9 b9 {p (fi {i) t9 69 N Ul N N (I� N CP N Cn N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 o (n N N 0 0 N m N N' �' N N m N' fn j CJt Ul (P UN N p 0 0 0 0 N O N W t9 Nb) 69 N K) b9 t9 69 {flCO t9 69 (!) 69 <B t/i b9 L) t9 Cn N Cii Ui UN 0 N m 0 A Ey t9 69 69 to 69 t9 t9 {fl {p 69 69 t9 ffl {fl 69 fA 69 69 b9 b9 t9 b9 69 N N (Nti N (NJi N y) i9 69 rl lfl fA0 t9 69 69 t9 t9 69 69 t9 t9 69 69 69 t9 Cly Ui Ot 0 N Q 0 0 m 0 m � fn N N 00 J a ------------------------ 0) °' m m o 'mii ao m� T D N T n O I m A z m m c= A X ;u O O z z m W W 0 O 0 O ui c -mC 'O Z z m C7 O c E m C m T m = T O C z w 0 T r -I < G c '� N,� T z T D O. M 0 r -1 -i m O O m� c m< m O In "D :0 �] r W N m -< < m m T D D O v 2 2< m 7� u� m D D =� '� N m C v .-. o G D T -i O D < O T mz --f O m m e D< m m z m n n < � r z A O> o v w< m < C m<< -� c T T. m O r O T T c D- v w m` D D r D O- m< G m� m O- r A m o G m o. m m r n D U m m r z C 0 m D -0 'y° m m G N N r m m n O COD c m W 0 Tz T z --i CD v N' m <--1 r zCA m o m O m m � to in in in in to to N w O in bi ifl ifl ifl in in in ifl m d in W {fl 0 fn 0 iA 0 N N W C', A A N 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U1 0 O 0 (P 0 N 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o p o o ;n o n 0 y .., m 9 (.A Ui (n Ot N UI N Cn Vl m N N m m N N N C) C) W W Cl W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O W W J W W W W W V J J m W 0o N N OJ W W O) w W m W N O] rm s N N N N N N N y N N N N N N N Af N N V V V V V W W W 7 tC iii ifl Hi ifl to iA iA iA 69 to to En Vi to in to ffl N ifl iii to in N N d3 in ifl J � W -4 W W W N O) N O N (O N (O W W W O O A A A (O SO N CP N Ol J W N N W W J V O O O iA ifl fA iii EA H3 Hi E9 b9 ifl w ifl in ifl in iA to N p ifl ifl iA fn N N iA in T W J. W W W N D) N O N (O N (O W W W W A -� W p Op A A A CO (O fn (.P O1 N -4 tit J W N N W W J J O O W O Vi it9 En to iA to in N N N W W A to N p in "' 1A in to in EA yi Hi bi '� J W W W -4 w N J m N N W W J W 00 00 A O Vi i!i fn to to to to 'En 69 N N< E9 w N in in 69 N b9 "n O? O) O) Q) W W W WO) W (]t N tli N V. J J J W 0 tJi O En N by 4A iALn W tH N N N W W A H ii N p '69 '69En in £9 ifl to 'En T O a E 0. m 0 0 0 0 L 0 Op 0 Z :n n p m m (� f7 m n m O O O W m N N= N (m/] cn m O n Z7 n n tl n �j f` mZj Z .m� T. a c C7 m m cn N m Cc co cC DC c C c c C a a { a mp C r -mn Z 1m 1x 0� y 0� D c c a c Z m ,Iln,Z7 mm mD <� D '�O<�-Di0<�w0<aG�<�<aG�c c rm- me r a m Z m Z r m 3 co m0 mn r-0 Z mz D0 rZ mz y0 rZper- D�D�D-V m Z �� <O N Co .A � m z °»:� rZ --i - r0 {z ma D n Ga ya <a=�<-n<z<zGm<— r�" Dz c W c c o a <�<--i.-.crcMCrcmc DO m� «« mm,rmmm-nm-Tnm-ZnG)ra-i��0 -I r r r r D Gc rr D� rO 0a ma a ma a. p c c m c m c c -� m m m m � -i m a <p me <r mz -i =0c N O �, O D i m ? z m m m G ao� O- m r r y o c7 n m r r m r m < D D D G7 G'J <= m <<<< i i - m m m m m m m i m m m CD m X a n to m t» m to m to m to m to m t» to to t» to t» t» is to to t» to to a 0 o O o O o m 0 m 0 m o m O m o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 '; • 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M m � 0 0 N w X in O cn O cn O cn O to O m O in O cn O cn O cn cn w cn to cn cn m m cn m r 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 v m w m w m w m w m w m w m w m w m w oo w m w m w w w w w w w w D to w m m m m m oo m N N N Nto N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 7 to (P N (n to (n to N to N ti3 N toto Cn (n tH to {fi to to ti3 'N to to to to to j O O O O O O O O (n O N O (n O N O m O O m V m J m J m J m V N N to Cn Vi (n {o N to (n to CT to m to CT to (n tii (n to to ti> {13 Eo to to vi to to T j O O O O O o O O O N O (n O (n O to O (n O m J m V m J m J m J N W to ti3 (n to Cn to N to (n {fl (n to (n t13 (n to m to m 69 N to to to rfl to to to to O O O O O O O O O O O (n O (n O (P O m V m J m J m J m J AN to Ul to N EA (lt to (n to N to (n to m to Cn to Cn to to Vi to to to tR to to to O O O O O O O O O (n O (n O m O m O (n O m J m J m J m J m V N N to (h to to to U1 t» N t» Sn t» tit to m to (n to (1n to to av to to t» Es t» to to j O O O O O O O O O N O N O N O m O c n O m V m J m J m J m J N 0. P. ci M M A o o m m czi mo 0 o o n M 0 c) y T O T C � r .p m x r n n T T '�f7 � x m m -0 m T An � co c c r T ri m o' o O r r c T m c o T y z --ri M m m m m A p o 0C: Oc v c mD �� A� 0 A 0 A 0 A <m A GW c m T It --� A p D r =� mT D� -u < n m Z -n'� GpG � m m <N .Z1 rm p<Z O O GZ m D D O D�D� T -n= C m n M mp Dp OWr � DZ DSD r'�r�m A mO TO D rC D rC=-1 m M m G D< D c m C7 Z�T.n< r7 'U G O D p m D< c G< A r < r< < 0 9 < G m 9 m 0 (i m Z DO r 0 Z '� m m mm m D- m-m- �� p z "U), .� x Z �<- CO m<<ZmZ'�-m-u Cl) co N �`� < < m c mm c 0 E D O mG) Np m OT c C Y m� z z W N G m m< m m m y= m m m G 1 m m o M 'A AGA mm v m D A�vc r rm A. 1 -rG m D 7.7 Y A m m D M m T T m m v CD In 0 to EA E9 E� N w w N EA u to EA EA E9 E� t� [» EA O EA O m a 0 0 0 O O N O N p N 00 N O N O NO O O O O O O O O O O O O '3 90 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (p A O o 0 O N ' k N N N N N N N N N W N N N N N N N N O N O N O N O N r O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O W W W W W W W W W W W 0o W co. W W W W W 40 W W W W 00 N W W W N N U N N N N N N N J Co N N r W N N N (n f71 cn tll M N Ch N cn N cn N W w W N m N ri N N m " N m N m N to N N " N N N m 7 E9 T ffl EA N EA N m M E9 E9 EA 4fl 4A EA 69 W W W J J v 00 W A A A Oo Oo 0o Oo 0o N N N I.1 IJ O J EA N � � M 4A N EA N T O] E9 EA Eli Efl iA Vi 4fl EA EA EA E9 A EA A T '� W C�T� W f�J� W J J O) O W A A A W 0o do do W o0 N N W J O W O N J EA Efl EA E9 E9fA fA ER N E9 N m O) W bi E9 E9 EA 69 V3 E9 H0 E9 E9 EA W W W W W O W A A A W 0o W M W W N N J O W O N J fA T EA EA 169 E9 E9 £A E9 NN En O N W E9 EA Hi Eft E9 EA 4A E9 E9 A A W W W W W O W m -� A A A W W W 0o W W N N J O W N N N J T EA EA EA E9 [A di fA N E9 N O) W E9 Hi EA E9 EA bi EA 4fl b9 E9 M A EA A W W W J O) O W W i A A A W 07 W 00 W W N N J O W O N 0N0 J R A N U 0 D m m m m M p N o-0 n m A G7 * r r D p O D E -n m m K r c m m m m m r m r m -i c D C r r r r r r D 0 z z z z z Z r r J r r rn m p m r m g z r 0 --1 -1 z rn>Z D .m z [n m ti J rn w D m x r r r 2 -� ? 3 in G7 Mm < C C (} N J rn (n C C m n m D 1�Dimt-Dim m m m w D -o = m m D O O Our X o rT- O D D y c m o z D= D O m 0 O m m m m m A n m m O O n rD D c m rn m p 1 ;u M, c z�z�zm 7X � � m x :O D � � x Z n { x A W (n 0) UD D D w m D C< r O� -n<< Dr G a w=N='= m z m m x a r _ D 2 m 0 m -n m O m -mi 1 --I � co rn G G G O m Z z D x x x m(n m m rn D rn m m o CO m m m o x m z cn cn C(n c� c c� cn C T u w o C 0 0 0 m m m m rn ° o 0 q A Cl) X a m EA fA ifl t9 4fl ffl £9 4A ifl to [n to Es t» [n tii <n to to <n N to N t» N to N r N U1 N CP N N J J J A A A A Ot (P (P (T (A W O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (P fP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ="• o p o 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(D� 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rt w Cn N (P m V V V -4 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V (P CA N 7 ffl fA {n ffl ffl iii ffl fA 4A fA {p fA b9 <£} ffl {fl fA ffl EA EA fA EA 169ui fii ffl T N N N N N N A A AN N N N N N w w- - -� CJ P N (O O CO O O CO A A A N W W W A A A A W W JO W W W W m m N N N N fn N N N A A A N N N N N N N N W W _� N N j O CD (O (O O (O A A A W N W W A A A A W W J J V J W W W W (A (A O1 w N N N N �_ -_� tg 1i3 N N N N N A A co _ N N n j (O tD O (O CO (0 A A A U N W W A .OTti ? W W J J J J w W W A O) (n w (P N 4A Efl Efl EA {fl EA Efl ffl 69 b9 £9 4A EA (A fA 'fI N N N N N Am.pp A N N N N N N N N w W- -� ^( (O (O (O CO CO (O A A A N W N N A? A A W W --4 --1 W W W N m m N Efl iii 4A [fl {A fA f9 iia {fl {A to w H3 fA Efl fA 4A 69 (p [A ffl Vi E9 T N A .p A N N N N N N N N W W s GST N -C fND CNO CNO (NO CNO A N CWJt Cwn (WIt A A A A W W J J J J W w w N A A m O A N U 0 co J x m D m m m z m T O Cl) c D to K y CA Z� M D '�,' T O� m r- T O z m A W O z A z A D Z ,Z07 T D cn —I r m m m m -° O z Z 2� O -Tri 0 D n m cn Z m T n 0 cn cn N m0 cnm�m��mOZO 0m��mmmm�m_Znrn?;� A D cn —i O� --i '� z -i z CO o cn T c —. D G7 D v O =� m A cn z co_ c n A T d> $ v y O m -n D O r O D D m O u m 0 cn c i m m m i d ("a m O cn :0 Z D n A r m m m T { ° O D cn c m �a C� m� o T o o m r y �� M G� r M z m z T m m n cn m —i o m m m r� mm��Dn A A=-0c�x y Cl) _ m CD t' Cn w Nr� w ss to to to t� vl a to [n to to to � �v jl 0 "•� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD pd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 O 0 0 o m� O n o _ W O O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N r 7 n D W W W W W W W W W W W W Oo N (n W N W W W W W W W W W W to iD A N N . N -I 77 V VVV V r V Vnp fVcNflo3 EEcCnoHO {HtONn0i 4cNONn0 4{cONinoi �'-N 4n fn �AN(A(nP '?N�CACnJt �N.CAP A<CCfANTnPn BNOWNWNJ �(NNp 4WVsfl fmV-n+ [m £mVfl {Wrnn Emm-AI EWVn KWVi ErnVn NNCOV T ChW o 0O W{NNTW0) IV 0) 0) o 4A NV HAW w 1.9 lwG N T -<w .WWON J N J N CAn N bJ CA (P O CA Q). O W W (➢ O N CO O O (fl (O O CA0) A W fn {fl EA fn ffl W w 1fl Hi fat N {n EA 4n E9 A H3 0 in 4n [fl fA N Hi Efl ffl fA N T { J O N N N CASs N� 0 W m m m O W W (A O N N O O (O t0 O W coN O A p N W En En H1 b9 49 fA fn W ffl W co N {ii E9 En ffl A fn CA EA Hi 1fl 4n Hi ffl ffl 4A Hi {n T { N J fP (Alt (Alt N (P 00 (n CA O W m M O m m N O N W N Im 2 cnC cn 2 n m mw a D m C m� r r -n A w N Zn N N m r r C m C m r c 0 am r r J rn D m -ZI -ZI Z N w t x _ = A Y <m<m<� nco D D Or zDmDmD-ml'y�yCn�o;� r<A<�<mz-mimeo m-nM?r = m mom z D � mz o K`" m m z z z m -n m m Z r O —i D —I D m z m z —� O Z m w —mj m m W 0 n m O m m D D O� m O 0 << m mo m m m -Di m -1 � m m X Hi M M - ea N v3 69 4n Vi n r m �: O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o M n 0 N X cn w cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn w w � m n w m CD m A V A V A V A V A V A V A V A W A W N V N V O d (p A P. 6N9N fN T V V V V m W W W N N N iI A V3 fA fA Hi N ifl N {ry N ? y N d3 N V3 N H3 D 14W V J � W W W N � r w N o a A s9 e» to en cfl <n ei yr i» to 'n G N V J V N N N N � N W N W N W N d A A � t+ in Ul ?- N N N T N w V v V NW W w w N N A A N N A N N N? N169 V V J W W W N 0) A Im 2 2 x 2 2 G7 n n m C C rG m C b z m D Z D G Gl G7 z r r N -I A O O O G) G1 N p N I r r v m r" O A C D O J m C C z A � Into In cn C m m 'n � n O m m m m D Z v v N z 1 n O 0 Z D Z o G<<< O O I O p C, N -V w D -< "� --I A G) O n n n n D D Z v v D v n Z 3 A m m m m A ZT. X m m m m -i D p � z O m m v v D 0 O C Z Sn L m C ti c C C C C r 2 G) T m n v z Co w 0 0 p C v v v v m m C m mm m m � -I y cn -DI m r 0 a D m a vii C C m T. 0 � z o v D p n Z v v O m O O z � x ---------------------- H N N N N N N W W In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O F+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� N N N N N W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 In In to In In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O f+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O pp NN N N N W W In V1 Ili N0 In 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0to O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O Ip 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In (n U't In In 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p ---------------------- `0 No N N N N W W 0O 0 00 0 0 0 Q 0Ili 0 0In 0 0 0 0In 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O F+ �0 N N N 0O 0O 0` 0NN 0W 0W 0Ili 0 0Ili 0In 0 0Ili 0In a 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O N {A ------------------------ t{0WW?R {i0IIh/nnT {'0(l/fT tiQIl/n?T {{0tnlo} . {Y0I/l/T?i i(0R/} L{0t/o?? it0h/F i{0l/T} {t0 OO O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0( O O O O O Q O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O p �N N N N N N N W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0III 0In Q 0Ill 0In OIli 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y1 W W Ifl X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0In 0 0 O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O p� W A N N O zp N O n T N G G G m M A A A A D Z D 2 S 2 �o n n r) n n O O O O m v D m v v m z w z�D„ n n n n v 1 O A '� n r m m n G1 D D S m A A A A M M m -I m m m m Cl)n m= 2 m S m � � m n n n n C r m -G < -G < m m D D C C G C C m A v m v v C O C I D M C .� m G D G7 �Z a C C C C m D I D- -1Z m EvN KvI-� �vN m OO m -I ZmOo 0 p T A 3v m n Dm D A Z1 Z O* C NKv n� p m 4 Km A Z z G Z m m Z --io Z n C C C C m C O L O O O n A m n D m D n -I -I m m m A m Z A v v v v O v O v 0 z A A A v G O C O A A A N N W N N N N j In cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 i.... O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V to to O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1--� N N N to In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f. O O O O O O O 000 O O O O O O O (p N N W In U� N N N H cn In 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0N 0N 0 0 0H 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 ON OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO O O p i-` N (n In O O O 0 OIli 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (n to O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N (n In O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NO N to to O O O 0 Oto a 0 ON ON Q 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 ----------------------- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N W Vt N N to to O 0 0 OIn Q ON 0 Q 0 0 0 ON 0 0 0 0 N --------------- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O yi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m < A D m mi n T n m n 0 -mG C N M D < m 0 < G m G D < m N n m nT. < D m n m G D m to �+ S Cml D m m r m A O cGi� Z G7 W -n r m A O vGi Z Gl D m r m A O vGi Z Gl W m r m A O vGi Z G1 D m A m D ?� m A m z m r' X D O Z C C= -DI ^ Z m O G1 D r m A z :E* m r r E� m m A m D> N m r r m m m A W N A**� m D 7. m A T z m r m r r m r m m r r m m r- m O Q A N m O T r) Ca 0 O n m 2 m �. < T G V m m A cn v m m A m r Z 0 m C A D -I -{ O O '1 A G N +LAOE n D r r 0C < n S D" A p m A r m A m T G m M m A m m G m z m -{ D v. m ^ T. A (n In Vi In U't (!i to U'i l!i In In lIt U9 to O to O to O to U't to (n yr (n to llt to In to lJi to V'i to to to Vt � V lJi (n U't (n to U Cn lfi to IA In lJl U'i N O N O N O N to N lIi N In N In N lfl N In N In N (n N In T 00 cn (Il cn (n In l.n (n V1 lli to In ltt In O O O In V'i In lti In U't 4'i (n ltt � Cn In (n (n lJt In (n U In (n to U't In O O O (Ji (n tit lti to lfi In V1 U't C ltt (n In (n (n In Vt U'i In (11 Cn In tJl N O N O N O N (n N Vt N In N lIl N U'i N In N lii N Gi N In T Y In l!t In (n V1 In V'i In Vt U'i (n Vt (!i O O O lJi In In In to In l!i (n In N (.n U Vt V'i In U't In (n In In (n to (n O O O lIi In to In In to lJt (li In W to In Cn (n Vt Vt In In In (n Vi Ili (n O O O (!i In U'1 U'i to Ui In V1 lli A In In lit l!i In In In [n V1 Vt (!i In (I1 O O O (n Vt t!i In Ili to In (n to N to cn ui to cn u, to cn vi cn cn in cn N o N 0 N o N cn N to N to N in N to N to N to N cn N v, m W D D o D D D 'a co m N V n m In w Z C- C Z A �� � � A N � C� ("1 � W �� m m m � m O (m'1 0� z 0 0 0 m � o n n O O z 1� m m 0 c n D Z Z Z < C y D w v w T In D m n u, n W C C C< < r< r m �--� n 2 m S 2 Dr D m D T r T r T r m m m m In N D n D G) 7 Z r -I C C m W C S O O 3 m C C C m << D D G D D D D D n W A- n Z yx m m m r T r T r m p_ r r r r W Z D m '� z r W Na D D D G G< In < In O C In -� m m m m 0 O -� n Gl m Gl m m p m mp m w N N m �P z m m -1 y -� a D D m m m N im O ,� > O m z v m 1 to to vl to to to v+ to to to to to to to to to to to to to yr to < V 00 O T N N W to Vl to t� to to yr to v+ to to to to to vl to to to to vl to to � W m rn a m m m < m < m < m < m m (,� O (-)o D_ O ,n O -1 n n n n n n n T T D T D T D T D T T D m 2 m .0 m D m O 7J r N r N r N 2 m m T T r T r T r T r T T m v+ cm O T� m� r C C < C < C < C < C C m m m m fl m m m m m m r T p Z m m m m 00 A D m m 'm2 m Z m m m D m < T r v y T 0 in G) C G7 T C r C X � D < m Z T G) m O iG D N { Vmi tmii -I -i -I n ('� n [ 1 Q Z m W m T (n m m m O O m 0 O r O O O O m z O z w s m D a o m T Z Z Z Z Z m mm 2 v G) ('1 -I G7 G1 G7 G7 < v N D O cn m =O m z D D m m m m m O m m 7J m r m 7J T1 A T T W T T to cn to to v> to in to to to to to to v. to to to to to '< T N T N T T T to to to to to to to to yr to to cn to to to to to to to < T m 19 R Im m Vl m N m D A D a T T O m m m m Z� Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -I -i a a T D N K -I cn 7.1 7o S m z� z to O Gil O Gil O G D F m m m 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z O' m G) G) n= Z m Z m Z m -i O x T _� C C C C r r r r D D D D ? D m Z yx Z y* Z m m _ -I -i -i m m m m -i -I -i I -I r 4t w n n f7 ,. 7] m S D w m C r r r r -I -I -I m m m m m O N m t"' v m r - i r C O m -ml -ml -m v v v<<<< G m m m m m r O i to cn cn in D D D D D - r M G O Z -�-1 - cn m v to v w v to T in Ll Gl G7 Gl < < G < G D C C C C Z D Z O D D D D Yk YC Si ii xk N y m< C C C C m m m m A w N N < mm m 0 \ \ \ D m m m m m N N D m < W D m D O O O m m m m T V T T T N O T N T N T W T A T T m R Im < < < < < < 0 2 2 < 2 G S 2 2 2 < 2 2 < S 2 2 D O D O D O D O y O D �, N D D N N D N N D v� cn in r n < m r (l G M r n < M r G M < M < M -p T < m m N N < N N < N F' N M m m m m m m m m m m T =< p m r m r -� m m m R° y -< N N m pT zr N T v T T v T cmi� D m m r C C -Zn C C C C C C -I m r T m C iZ W W m z r m --jC C T C .Q Z m C Z 3 D D T— tTi� — T Z — m -i T W m T z m D m � D to OD W � W Z C.7 Z -min vNi mC1 D -C-�I tmii Tr G1 W W T y C -CI m T C C D C m z mG) D< m m C m m n m -I Z Z m �ZI r m m D m < m D { m m { r { G G) O p m m < m > m � D D r { r { T m m m m T T T V T 00 T b T T N T N T W T ? T T m 7J T T= T- T m T W V m T 'D 0 0 0 0 —I T G O G G 2� D zb m m S m A m C m C w m D r n n n A D D D n D O n n D O n 1 z N ti, c �n c c (n in to in r r 0<<< D = r < r G r G n m O p m cn (p cn in in m in m cn m T 61 Gl Z Z Z O D m m m m m m m m D < N m A A T T D �' 0 0 cn W p m m m m m r m m r m m r m m m e m `^ T p p p p c G< O O v G G v Z z z z D z z m<< Z Z S m T N A< p r G v Ll m m �. m m m O Z "' n' D C T T O O O O GD m m D z m z C C 1 Gl m m m m =_ DI n m - m = m r m T T V T 00T toT O T N T N T W T A to to to trt to to to yr to to vT to to to to to to vx to to < T Ot O O a -I (n m to to N p cn N cn S 7o m w A G) w n m n z G) .T G1 A C C T 7J O O D C C C m m m D m C m D m D m D m D m z> c p o w w w x c n n n- n Q� 0 -1 n v C m m m m C C N w w �° Q m m m m� m A m m m cn D D n G n m n G n < n < n < n D m G1 "� r < C D C T C D C D C D C D C a A n Z ri == r n w �^ D < D 1�<� G G < D 00 nD m Q G -i m -� _I m -I m -I m -I m -p m E5 T 'm 0 0 < rm -i q n "' O W O D O O O O O 3 D m n n m y �^ z w z Z Z Z Z Z z m p m 2 N O Q c m m p r p m A T z 0 O n r� .m � m m m m m m m m T O x z N N N C T m p m C r O z 0 O Z vmi m m C vNi m -Ci -CI m T T 00 T to t/t <n v* to to to to <n v* v> to to to to to in v> to -G T O T N T to cn in to to to to to yr to vt to v* to to to to to to < N T W T T T O N 0 w 00 00 T �! G, ur O N ; d ° V S 0 N cn O1 �I d. < d 3 m C N � V e=T eOT T T T G D T eOT e�4 .fit M N f0 N N — m m y d d d ry ton F+ O ~' :-' O o om o\' 0 0 0 0 o 0 o m d ih O in W O O N F+ K Ot Ot K A N W W S W Qp V V V O O VA A o W T O W o O O ih m O W ih a V n W to to N N K rn K V V 0�0 O O 0~0 A A o W M O 0 0 O O W V {R V4 O W NO co W 0 0 V v 0 0 A A W V O O A A N W IN W{ W Fes+ F+ F-� F' N ONt {!1 ONt (A N V VA AO W NO 0 � Q10 m O V V O O O O Ji W 001 V O O N N { N Q N d { N V A � m Np W p v F+ O 0 O N 'p W 0 W V V 0 0 00 00 O A O m o A W N T pj N F-` N W N OC W N W N N O W m� � N 3 N 0 3 m o r m m N N F+ (O W 0 3 0 2 = W Ol W N N '. W Ol A W N F� n n n " A N of A J V W N m r 1 O O 4 N O S X X X 1n A to A 4n n N W N N \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 S > > O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O Q m w n S n S n S r� r� 1 .� N l.n lJi (n In O O In V O O O 0c) 00. N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 O �.a V OW N 0 0o J W O W O O O O 0 0 0 0 00 00~ in to t/t J F' W O. W o 0 N N In V1 In In O O In to O O O C) 0 {p O O o o 0 O F+ �p l0 N W00 Om w �p O V 00 00 O 0o O W O W O O O O VNi O O O O O O N O O O N O Ol 00 O W W N w 0 W 0 0 Fes+ O O O 107 O O N N Im a ƒ \ o � 7 / In �k 0 0§ — (CL \ k -4 N /toPO W � \ � � \ N � \ � � Im I I N N O d _r v ` C vN N N W M A N N N y .t n V A W N N G (D N a n On a N N n G N N N qQ _. v n < a z X S � � C � a r a n s 3 S � a 3 3 O y I N Everglades City Asset Management Plan Appendix E Glossary 4/25/2017 Term Definition Annual Debt Payment The dollar amount that must be paid each year toward retiring existing debt. Annual Operating Expenses Total annual cost of operating and maintaining the water or wastewater utility service. This does not include savings or future draws from capital savings accounts. Asset A component of a facility with an independent physical and functional identity and age (e.g. pump, motor, sedimentation tank, main). Asset Category Where the asset best fits within your system (e.g., source water, distribution or collection), for organizational purposes. Asset Inventory A list of assets with details about each one (installation date, original cost, condition, and such). Also known as an asset register. Asset Management A process for maintaining a desired level of customer service at the best appropriate cost. Asset Name The name of the technology or equipment that is used for your system to properly function (for example, "5th Street Pumping Station'). See also, Asset Asset Status This is how your utilities view an asset. Assets can be active (most assets), not in use or a future investment. You would designate an asset a "future investment" if you would like it added to your capital improvement plan. Asset Type The asset's functional purpose for a specific asset category (for example, intake structure, pumping station, transmission main, storage tank, and the like). Associated Asset Assets that are directly related to a primary asset's function. Associated Location A location that complements an associated asset. Capital Improvement (Expense) Funds required for the future purchase, repair or alteration to or for an asset, structure, or major pieces of equipment. Capital Improvement Program Plan (CIPP) A plan that projects and assesses which projects (including asset improvements, repairs, replacements, and 107 Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Term Definition such) need to be completed in the future. Capital Reserve Contribution Funds set aside to fund capital improvements (i.e. future purchase, repair or alteration to or for an asset, structure, or major pieces of equipment). Cash on Hand The amount of cash that is available to the system within a 24 hour period. Condition The current condition, in your opinion, of an asset according to its age and physical functionality (ranging from poor to excellent). Consequence of Failure The real or hypothetical results associated with the failure of an asset. Debt Payment The dollar amount that must be paid each year toward paying down or retiring existing debt. Debt Ratio Debt Ratio =Total Liabilities / Total Assets The debt ratio measures the amount of debt being used by the organization. A ratio of 0.6 means that 60% of operations have been financed with debt and the remaining. 40%o has been financed by equity. Emergency Reserve Contribution Funds set aside for unexpected repairs and replacements. CUPSS recommends that utilities work toward an emergency reserve balance of 25% of its annual operating expenses. Expected Useful Life The average amount of time, in years, that a system or component is estimated to function when installed new. Expense Money spent by the utility to continue its ongoing operations. Expense Ratio Expense Ratio = Operating Expense / Total Expense The expense ratio measures the amount of operating expenses compared to total expenses. A high ratio indicates that most expenditures are for operations— leaving the remaining balance for non-operating costs (such as debt service, capital improvements, and such). If the non-operating balance is small, the utility is not likely to meet all its capital -related expenses, which might cause the system to deteriorate more rapidly. Financial Assets Intangible assets such as cash and bank balances. H Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Term Definition Growth The amount, as a percent, a community's demand for water or wastewater treatment has increased or decreased. This value will be used to adjust future revenues and expenses. Inflation The anticipated rate of increase in the price level of goods and services. Interest Rate A rate that is charged or paid for the use of money. Note: Do not include a percentage sign. Level of Service The characteristics of system performance such as how much., of what nature, and how frequently, with regard to the system's service. Liabilities The financial obligations for which the utility is responsible. Maintained According to Factory Recommendation The frequency of routinemaintenance as recommended by the manufacturer. Operating Expenses Total annual cost of operating and maintaining the water or wastewater utility service. This does not include savings or future funds withdrawal from capital savings accounts. Operating expenses include maintenance, equipment, salaries, wages, benefits, supplies, chemicals, contracts, utilities, monitoring, testing, emergency, rent, mortgage, insurance, services, training costs, billing costs, fees, and security costs. Operating Ratio Operating Ratio = Operating Revenue / Operating Expense The operating ratio demonstrates the relationship between operating revenues and operating expenses. A high ratio indicates that the organization has operating efficiency by keeping expenses low relative to revenue. Original Cost The amount paid for the initial purchase of an asset. Probability of Failure The chance an asset will fail based on the percent of effective life consumed and redundancy. Redundancy Spare assets that have the ability to do the same job, if a failure of the primary asset were to occur. Replacement Cost How much will it cost to replace the asset, if required today? Revenue Funds earned by the system through the sale of water or I1; Everglades City Asset Management Plan 4/25/2017 Term Definition by other means. Revenue Surplus/Deficit The difference between the total cost of doing business and the funds received from fees, loans and grants, and interest earned from any accounts. If the result is zero or greater, the utility is taking in enough money to fully recover its costs and have a surplus. If the result is less than zero, the utility will not cover all costs and therefore will have a deficit. Risk The potential for realization of unwanted adverse consequencesor events. Routine Maintenance Cost How much does it cost for a single routine maintenance activity to be performed on the asset? Sales Ratio Sales Ratio = Sales / Total Revenue The sales ratio measures the percentage of total revenue that is made up of sales from operations. A low ratio indicates that the organization is overly reliant on outside funding. Savings Withdrawal A fixed amount of money removed from the savings account of the utility to help pay for capital improvement items or other planned or unplanned maintenance. Total Annual Cost of Doing Business The total annual operating expenses plus the required total annual reserve contributions to reserve funds. 110 Everglades City Asset Management Plan Appendix F 2015 FDEP Sanitary Survey and Consumer Confidence Report 4/25/2017 111 May 18, 2016 The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Mayor Everglades City PO BOX 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 mayorhamilton@aol.com Re: Compliance Assistance Offer Everglades City WTP PWS 5110089 Collier County - PW Dear Honorable Hamilton: Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Secretary A Sanitary Survey inspection was conducted at your facility on April 1, 2016. During this inspection, potential non-compliance was noted. The purpose of this letter is to offer compliance assistance as a means of resolving these matters. Specifically, potential non-compliance with the requirements of chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Chapters 62-555 and 62-550, Florida Administrative Code, were observed. Please see the attached inspection report for a full account of Department observations and recommendations. We request you review the items of concern noted and respond in writing within 15 days of receipt of this Compliance Assistance Offer. Your written response should include one of the following: 1. Describe what has been done to resolve the non-compliance issue or provide a schedule describing how/when the issue will be addressed. 2. Provide the requested information, or information that mitigates the concerns or demonstrates them to be invalid, or 3. Arrange for the case manager to visit your facility to discuss the items of concern. It is the Department's desire that you are able to adequately address the aforementioned issues so that this matter can be closed. Your failure to respond promptly may result in the initiation of formal enforcement proceedings. ivipw.dep.state jt.us Florida Department of Environmental Protection :ep South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@dep.stateftus May 18, 2016 The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Mayor Everglades City PO BOX 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 mayorhamilton@aol.com Re: Compliance Assistance Offer Everglades City WTP PWS 5110089 Collier County - PW Dear Honorable Hamilton: Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Secretary A Sanitary Survey inspection was conducted at your facility on April 1, 2016. During this inspection, potential non-compliance was noted. The purpose of this letter is to offer compliance assistance as a means of resolving these matters. Specifically, potential non-compliance with the requirements of chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Chapters 62-555 and 62-550, Florida Administrative Code, were observed. Please see the attached inspection report for a full account of Department observations and recommendations. We request you review the items of concern noted and respond in writing within 15 days of receipt of this Compliance Assistance Offer. Your written response should include one of the following: 1. Describe what has been done to resolve the non-compliance issue or provide a schedule describing how/when the issue will be addressed. 2. Provide the requested information, or information that mitigates the concerns or demonstrates them to be invalid, or 3. Arrange for the case manager to visit your facility to discuss the items of concern. It is the Department's desire that you are able to adequately address the aforementioned issues so that this matter can be closed. Your failure to respond promptly may result in the initiation of formal enforcement proceedings. ivipw.dep.state jt.us Everglades City; PWS 1D No.: 5110089 Compliance Assistance Offer Page 2 of 2 May 18, 2016 Please address your response and any questions to Juan Robles of the South District Office at 239- 344-5660 or via e-mail at Juan.RoblesAdep.state.fl.us. We look forward to your cooperation with this matter. Sincerely, 9,� en ifer Carpenter Assistant Director of District Management South District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosure: Inspection Report (with enclosures) JC/JR/se ec: Tim Stephens; timstel2hens@embMmail.com com Dottie Joiner; dsmallwoodna citvofeverglades.ore Lisa Koehler; lkoehlera0wmd.eov James Oni; James.Onigdep.state.Aus Sanitary Survey Form Page 1 IBASIC SURVEY INFORMATION X Surface Name of Surface Source(s): Water System Plants:I NAeration ❑Coagulation NDisinfection Name: Everglades Cit UCorrosion Control Date(s) Surveyed: 4/1/2016 Survey Inspector(s): Juan Robles Person(s) Total service connections: 1,000 Population served: 2,500 Contacted: Josh Stephens System Design: 465.000 GPD Primary Limiting Factor: Filtration High Service Pumps: GPD Routinely utilized interconnections? []Yes NNo CONTACT INFORMATION Max: 437,000 GPD 25% Max: 109,250 GPD PWS ID: 5110089 System (Office) Address: 24940 SR 29 Copeland, FL 34137 Max daily demand is less than 75% of design capacity? []Yes N No tsmallwood@cityofeverglades.or Phone: (239)695-2503 Cell:_ (239)695-3791 Email/Fax: Firm capacity more than average (avg) daily demand? []Yes ONo Everglades City (Sammy Standby/avg power capacity more than avg daily Owner Name: Hamilton) Title: Owner 12 12 Address: PO Box 110 City: Everglades City State: FL Zip: 34139 Owner Phone: (239)695-3791 Cell: (239)695-2758 Email/Fax ma orhamilton aol.com Operator Name: Tim Stephens Lead Operator Class & Certification Number: C-0007902 Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Cell: Email or Fax: timstephens@embargmail.com RACTERISTICS SUMMARY X Surface Name of Surface Source(s): (check boxes for treatment used) rNumber Plants:I NAeration ❑Coagulation NDisinfection NFiltration UFlocculation ❑Membrane ❑Softening ❑Stabilization UCorrosion Control SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARY Total service connections: 1,000 Population served: 2,500 Survey area characteristics: Community TOTAL SYSTEM CAPACITY AND DEMAND System Design: 465.000 GPD Primary Limiting Factor: Filtration High Service Pumps: GPD Routinely utilized interconnections? []Yes NNo If routinely used, what is hydraulic capacity? GPD Max: 437,000 GPD 25% Max: 109,250 GPD Average: 239,399 GPD Last survey max: 671.000 GPD Max daily demand is less than 75% of design capacity? []Yes N No Comment Storage capacity more than 25% of max daily demand? NYes [-]No Comment Firm capacity more than average (avg) daily demand? []Yes ONo Comment Standby/avg power capacity more than avg daily demand? OYes ONo Standby power capacity: 465,000 GPD E E Sanitary Survey Form Page 2 ITIREATIVIENT CHEMICAL Plant name Chemical storage appear to be compliant? IN [-]No Facilities & chemicals properly labeled? ®Yes ONo Are all chemical feed systems tied to flow? ®Yes ONo Corrosive vapors properly controlled?M Yes ONO Are dusty and dry chemicals and feed equipment housed separately? OYes ONo ® NIA Manual or flow paced? Flow Location Chemical Purpose NSFIANSI? tda Plant Sodium Hypochlorite Disinfection ®Yes ONo Plant Ammonium Sulfate Disinfection MYes ❑Nc Plant Sulfuric Acid pH adjustment NYes ONo Plant Sodium Hydroxide pH adjustment AYes ONo Plant Scale Inhibitor Mineral scale prevention AYes ONO rE E Panic hardware provided? NA Storage & feed isolated? E Ventilation Compliant? NA Vent switch on exterior? 0 U Leak containment? NA Leak detection & fix kit? (>1 ton DISINFECTION Plant name Everglades City Type (gaslhypolchloramination) Hypo Condition of Equipment Good Feed Rate (PPD, GPD) 33 GPD Manual or flow paced? Flow Alarm testing frequency? Unknown Chlorine loss alarm functional? Y 150 Ib or Ton Cylinders? NA Automatic Switchover? (>10 PPD NA Scale compliant? NA Chlorine feed rate? NA • Cylinders restrained? NA Ammonia bottle onsite? NA Wrench in-place? NA Panic hardware provided? NA Storage & feed isolated? NA Ventilation Compliant? NA Vent switch on exterior? NA Leak containment? NA Leak detection & fix kit? (>1 ton NA Typed used (sodium or calcium) Sodium Type of Feeder: Diaphragm Solution strength 12% approx. • Solution tank compliant? Y Adequate spill containment? Y Chlorine to ammonia ratio? 4.2:1 Ammonia flow -paced? Y Ammonia after chlorine? Y Free chlorine burn frequency? Unknown c m E E U j Sanitary Survey Form Pana 3 (PageTREATMENT Location of sampling (POE Plant 1, East Plant Remote What test kit was used for the sampling? PW2 PW2 A Time sample was collected? 11:39 am 10:16 am Result? (note whether free or total) 2.3 mg/I (Free) 1.9 mg/I (Free) Sampler Name? (if other than lead inspector) Are disinfectant residuals tested in the distribution system as established by rule? ®Yes []No Are injection points located in positions indicated in approved 4 -log demonstration? ❑Yes ❑No Are the minimum tank levels specified in approved 4 -log demonstration maintained? ❑Yes ONO s Continuous monitoring required? ❑Yes ❑No If so, are analyzers used? ❑Yes ❑No Analyzers calibrated? ❑Yes ❑No NA Why is aeration used? Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Type of aeration Tray Screening intact? © Yes ❑ No Mesh size #24? AYes 11 N e Aerator adequately protected from contaminants (covered, located properly)? ®Yes ONo m Why is stabilization practiced? What chemicals are being used: NA What treatment process is used? What chemicals are used? NA Why is activated carbon used? GAC types used A PAC stored properly? OYes ❑No ON/A GAC backwash compliant? ❑Yes ONo ❑N/A What testing is performed to determine effectiveness of activated carbon? NA Why is softening being used? NA 4 Proper fluoride concentration in distribution? ❑Yes ONo Are the fluoride concentrations consistent? OYes El No Safety considerations compliant? ❑Yes ONo NA Why is ion exchange used? e NA 41 Sanifnm Curvav Fnrm Page 4 List the type and combination of coagulants: List the types of coagulant aids being used: List flocculation facilities that are being used: Rapid mix unit adequate? DYes ONo Flocculation adequate? DYes DNo Flocculation detention time? E NA 0 U Types of filtration utilized: ❑Gravity ❑Pressure ❑Constant ❑Declining rate Other: Types of media installed: ❑Mono ❑Dual ❑Multi ❑ Other: Filtration and related equipment operated properly and in good repair? ❑Yes ONo Are mud balls/ cracks prevented? ❑Yes ❑No Filter gallery piping in good condition? DYes ❑No Color coded? DYes ❑No Filter gallery floor drained? DYes DNo What initiates a backwash? Backwash flow rate: Is re -wash (filter -to -waste) capability available? DYes ❑No If so, it is used? DYes DNo Meters calibrated and/or checked for accuracy? D Yes DNo How often? Are the disinfection byproduct precursor removal requirements of the Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts Rule being met? DYes ❑No System required to prepare disinfection profile? DYes DNo Profile available for review? DYes DNo Any individual filter excursions occurred in past? DYes ❑No If so, actions taken: E NA 0 U What are the shortest & average times between filter replacements? U a' c� E 5 microns Q Q1 U Type of membrane(s) used: Unknown Safeguards in place to warn of membrane failure? ®Yes ❑No Type of pre-treatment used: Scale inhibitor Date of membrane installation: 2014 Fouling rate of membranes? Unknown Expected life of membranes: 7-10 years approx. What's the ercent recove ? 90-93% Operatinn nrPqqiirP- Types of sedimentation/clarification process & facilities being used? • Flow distributed evenly to basins? DYes ❑No Mechanical equipment working? DYes ❑No Settled water turbidity? e Indication of excess sludge in basin(s)? DYes ONo How often is sludge removed? � o NA U Types of sedimentation/clarification process & facilities being used? Where is treatment waste disposed? (i.e., RO concentrate, brine, etc.) Concentrate Equalization Tank and Wastewater Treatment Plant uenc of cleanin and dis osal of cleaningfluids and brines: As needed automatic TFre 0 U -: Is the dose utilized currently adequate? DYes DNo Is the equipment room kept clean and dry? Oyes ONo ;I o NA U 4) Sanitary Survey Form Page 5 PUMPS AND CONTROLS GROUNDWATER QUANTITY, QUALITY, AND PROTECTION Total Source Capacity exceeds Maximum Daily Demand? DYes []No Firm capacity exceeds Average Daily Demand? ©Yes []No Any unused or improperly abandoned wells within system?[]Yes ®No System have a well head protection program? ®Yes ❑No Does the system have an emergency spill response plan? DYes ©No E U *Emergency Response Plan was not available for review at the time of inspection. GROUNDWATER WELLS HS #2 HS #3 (jockey) Well name Well #6 Well #7 FLUWID AA04490 AA04491 Year well drilled 2012 2012 Depth well drilled 37' 37' Aquifer name Sand and Gravel Sand and Gravel ® Depth of casing 22' 22' Diameter of casing 8" 8" w Pump type Submersible Submersible 30 Horsepower Unknown Unknown 10 Rated capacity (GPM@PSp 375 GPM 375 GPM 325 GPM Observed Yield?(GPM@P5q Unknown Unknown Subject to flooding? Y Y Setbacks compliant? N N Any past contamination? Y Y Raw water tap compliant? Y Y Well head sealed? Y Y Casing >12" above grade? Y Y Casing vent compliant? Y Y Check valve compliant? Y Y Water meter compliant? Y Y Air -relief valve installed? Y Y Dumpline installed? Y Y Stand-by Power? Y Y E E U Minimum Pressure: 50 PUMPS AND CONTROLS HS #1 HS #2 HS #3 (jockey) HS #4 (jockey) Transfer Pumps (2) Emergency (Fire) Pressure Booster HSP High service High service High service High service Transfer Pressure Booster Centrifugal Centrifugal Centrifugal Centrifugal Vertical Turbine Centrifugal FA 30 25 10 10 10 Unknown da 400 GPM 325 GPM 175 GPM 175 GPM 350 GPM Unknown ? NA NA NA NA NA NA DISTRIBUTION uency: Dat least quarterly []per written plan ®Other: Ever two months Pressure 60 psi Minimum Pressure: 50 tenance Program Compliant? []Yes ONo F # of inline valves: How often exercised? ng and valve maintenance records were not available at the time of inspection. I Sanitary Survey Form Page 6 STORAGE Tank Name or Number Copeland Town an Storage type (Around, elevated, hydre, etc;) Ground Ground Tank material (steel, concrete, etc.) Concrete Concrete Tank size (Gallons) 500,000 500,000 Watertight roof/hatch? Y Y Venting/screens compliant? Y Y Overflow compliant? Y Y Level/PSlindicator compliant? Y Y Drain & bypass installed? Y Y Interior coating meet NSF? Y Y Date of last annual inspection Unknown Unknown Year of last 5 year inspection *2013 *2013 Year of last 5 year washout *2013 *2013 On/Off pressure (PSI) settings NA NA Altitude valves present? (ewwwd) NA NA Adequate turnover provided? Y Y Manually ❑Manua[ly ❑Manually ❑Manually ❑Manually ❑Manually ❑Manually How are tanks levels controlled ®Auto onsite ®Auto onsite OAuto onsite ❑Auto onsite ❑Auto onsite ❑Auto ansite ❑Auto onsite OSCADA OSCADA OSCADA OSCADA OSCADA OSCADA OSCADA o *GST inspection reports were not available on site for review. U Written available required monitoring plans? ®Bacteriological ®DBP ZPb/Cu and WQP ❑Other: Monitoring program maintained and followed per rule? ®Yes ONo Records retention compliant? ❑Yes ❑No Is testing required monitoring equipment compliant? MYes []No Are the reagents in date? ®Yes LJ No ©, Proper procedures for calibrating monitor equipment? ®Yes ONo Are records maintained per the FDEP ®Yes ONo Parameters currently monitored: ®Chlorine ®pH OF []PO4 EIFe OH2S ❑Turbidity ❑Other: Any monitoring & reporting, treatment techniques, or MCL problems? UYes ❑No Violation Follow-up Date Cyanide 113012016 E E U Plant Category/Class: 2C Lead operator class compliant? ®Yes ONO Number of plant operators: 2 Treatment 0&M log type: Bound Book Approved for reduced staffing? []Yes 0 No Distribution category'. 113 Distribution 0&M lag type: ❑Paper ❑Approved Electronic 0 I Plant Log Book It the log compliant? Yes ONo Are all licenses valid? ZlYes ❑No Does staffing meet requirements of 62-699, FAC? ®Yes ONo Josh Stephens (B-0014559) was the operator at the time of inspection. U 4 Sanitary Survey Form Page 7 Formal Org Chart: ®Available ❑ Not available Is there a Capital Improvement Plan or plan for system sustainability?: ®Yes ❑ No E U Are financial, operational data, and maintenance records maintained? ❑Yes ® No Are main breaks reported and recorded ZYes ❑ No Are boil water notices issued when applicable? ®Yes ❑No E*The GST inspection reports were not available at the plant for review during the time of inspection. U Emergency response plan on -file? ❑Yes ®No Compliant security in place (e.g. wails, plants, storage, pumps, etc.)? ®Yes ❑ No E *Emergency Response Plan was not available for review at the time of inspection. U Preventative Maintenance Program in place? L1 Yes ❑No Are written SOPs and 0&M Manuals for: ❑Flushing ❑Valves ❑Plants ❑Clearances LJ New Line Installations o *Preventive Maintenance Plan was not available for review at the time of inspection. U Maps Include: ® Lines (all) LJ Valves ❑Flush/Fire Hydrants ZStorage/Booster Pumps ❑Interconnections E1 Line Size LJ Line Material ❑Updates ❑Air relief/Blow-off Valves ❑Complaints E E U Does the system have and implement a written cross connection control program? ❑Yes ❑No LINA UNKNOWN Has the cross connection control annual report been submitted? ❑Yes ❑No LINA Do any of the past three years of annual reports indicate any deficiencies? [-]Yes []No ❑NA Are there any cross connections observed onsite or in the distribution system? ❑Yes ® No E *Cross Connection Control Plan was not available for review at the time of inspection. Is continuous training provided? NYes ❑ No Does the system appear to have adequate staff to maintain compliance? NYes ❑ No E U Capacity of Standby Power Source: Unknown kW Svatchover: ®Automatic El Manual Hrs Operated Under Load: 1 hour/week Is stand-by equipment exercised at least monthly? ®Yes F1 No Satisfy average daily demand? ZYes ❑No ❑Unknown What equipment does it operate? ZWeIIPumps ® High Service Pumps ® Treatment Equipment Audio-visual alarm? EYes ❑No E E U Areas of Concern Noted? ®Yes El No Areas of Concern Rule Corrective Action Date Significant Deficiency? Corrected Please see the summary of deficiencies belowfor a complete description of the areas of concern and corrective actions. Y Technical assistance providers recommended? IZYes ❑No Sanitary Survey Form Page 8 SUMMARY OF DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. 1- There were several cracks on the outside of ground storage tank near the booster station (please see photos 1 through 5). Within a majority of the cracks, it appears that calcium deposit has built up indicating the possibility of leaks (please see photos 6, 7, and 8). Also, the foundation of the tank seemed eroded at several places (please see photos 3 and 4). The tank inspection report was not available for review at the time of inspection. Please have the tank inspected and/or repaired to prevent failure of the tank. Rule 62-555.350(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) 2- It was stated during the time of inspection and by phone conversation on April 6, 2016 that the fill control valve for the Ground Storage Tank (GST) at the booster station was repaired and operational (please see photo #9). However, on May 12, 2016, two DEP inspectors in the area noticed the storage tank overflowing. Please repair the fill control valve and inspect the GST for damage (see photos 1 through 8 for reference). Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 3- High service pumps #3 and #4 appeared to be nonfunctional at the booster station. Also, the rotating mass safeguard for high service pump #1 was missing which poses a safety hazard (please see photo #10). Please repair or replace the pumps and related electronic and safety parts. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 4- The recirculation pumps for the ground storage tank at the booster station are not in operation and is not clear if the pipes were holding water (please see photo 411). Please have these pumps repaired and/or replaced. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 5- The water flowmeter at the booster station was leaking from underneath the housing bolts (please see photo #12). Please repair the leak. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 6- There was a pipe (painted blue) leaking a substantial amount of water at the bottom of a ditch on the side of the booster station building (please see photo #13). Please repair the leak. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. Also, there was nonfunctional equipment still connected to the booster station infrastructure that could pose a health and/or security risk (please see photos 14-16). Please assess the equipment and disconnect or remove if no longer in use. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 7- A review of the MORS revealed that water flows were near the permitted capacity consistently since July, 2015. Please provide an explanation for the high flows to the Department or indicate if the plant needs to be re -rated. You may contact James Oni at 239-344-5679 or via email at iames.onina,dep.state.fl.us for this matter. 8- The dashboard meters at the Nano Filtration skid were malfunctioning and need to be repaired or calibrated. As is shown in photo #17, the reading for pH at the time of inspection was 9.22 S.U. A bench test was immediately requested and the reading obtained was 8.74 S.U. (please see photo #20). The inaccuracy of the meters can result in issues with chemical feeding. Please repair, calibrate, or replace all dashboard meters in the Nano Filtration skid. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 9- Transfer pump #2 located at the WTP was not operational at the time of inspection and was leaking from the packing gland seal (please see photo # 21 and 22). Please repair or replace the transfer pump. Rule 62- 555.350(2), F.A.C. 10- At the time of inspection, there was no emergency response plan available for inspection. Please create and/or maintain an emergency response plan in the plant at all times and in accordance with Rule 62- 555.350(15), F.A.C. 4 Sanitary Survey Form Page 9 11- A preventative maintenance plan was not available at the time of inspection. Please create and/or maintain a preventive maintenance plan in accordance with Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 12- The implementation of the cross connection control program for the City water system was not clear at the time of the inspection. In addition, the system shall review its current program to ensure it meets the requirements for the revised Cross -Connection Control Rule. Please review and update your Plan and provide the Department with information on the actions the City is taking to ensure cross connections are controlled on a continuing basis (i.e. testing of backflow preventers in accordance with the City's Cross -Connection Control Plan). Rule 62- 555.360(2), F.A.C. 13- There was no flushing program or isolation valve exercising program during the time of inspection. Please provide a copy of these plans to the Department. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 14- The well vents at both wells appeared to be held in place with duct tape (please see photo #23). Please seal around the vent where it meets the casing. Also, the air relief valve at well #7 was leaking (see photo 424). Please repair the well vents at both wells and repair or replace the air relief valve at well 47. Rules 62- 555.320(8)(c) and 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 15- There is a valve between the raw water and treated water that could potentially allow untreated water to bypass treatment (please see photo #26). Please remove the valve to eliminate the possibility of untreated water bypassing treatment and being feed into the distribution system. PHOTOS Photo #1: GST showing exterior cracks and erosion of the foundation. Photo 42: Closer view of the foundation area. e -& Photo #3: Another view of the foundation area. Photo 95: External cracks on GST. Photo #6: Calcium deposits on GST. 10 Sanitary Survey Form Photo #7: Anther side of the GST showing calcium deposits. 11 Photo #8: Another side of the GST with calcium deposits. Photo #9: GST fill control valve. Photo 910: High service pump #1 without safeguard. (working at the time of inspection). Page 11 Photo #11: Transfer pumps (far left). Photo 912: Flow meter at booster station. MEM ige 12 Photo #15: Nonfunctional equipment at booster station. Photo 916: Inside view of nonfunctional chlorine storage tank. fix% Sanitary Survey Form Page 13 Photo #17: Meter on Nano filtration skid displaying a Photo 018: Another view of the Nano filtration dashboard pH reading of 9.22 on the finished water. (raw water on the left, finished water on the right). 0-`m sea Page 14 Photo #23: Well vent held in place by duct tape at well #6. Photo #24: Well vent held in place by duct tape and air relief valve leaking at well V. Page 15 Photo 925: Another view of well #6. Photo #26: Valve between raw and finished water Photo #27: Nano filtration Unit. Sanitary Survey Form L_ Photo #29: Monitoring equipment at plant Page 16 Inspector's Signature Reviewers Signature —c - a� Date: April 15, 2016. Date: May 13 2016 Page 17 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -F COLLIER COUNTY LETTER OF MARCH 20, 2017 AND FLORIDA DEP LETTER OF MARCH 3, 2017 REGARDING EVERGLADES CITY UTILITIES 5 Pages Office of the County Manager Leo E. techs, Jr. March 20, 2017 "Sle;ct;creral;-; March 20, 2017 Mr. Jon M. lglehart o Florida Department off"rvironmental Protection (FDEPa Director of District Management South District, P,0. Box 2549 Port Myers, IL. 33902-2549 RE: Everglades City Utilities Dear Mr. Iglehart: In continuittg our conversation regarding assistance to Everglades City and in response to your letter dated March 1, 2017, we placed an item on our March 14. 2017 Commission agenda seeking, authority to begin formal discussions with I IiP (Item l 11) attaohed}. Through discussions with our Board members both individually and collectively there is an expressed interest in supporting the health and wellbeing of the Everglades Pity utility customers. With that said, there was also a strong consensus that we take a thoughtful and cautious approach as we move forward. With the Board's approval, our team is now available to begin those formal discussions regarding the proposed receivership option with the caveats that we would work together to make sure sufficient funding was available and that the County's livability would be limited. Dr. Yilmaz, and County Attorney .telt Klatzkow will represent the County as we move forward. Please feel 6roe to coordinate with them directly. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any additional questions or Concerns. sincerely. Leo F. 1I� County Manager CC;: .teff Klatzkow, County Attoruev Commissioner Nick Casalanguida, Deputy County Manager Dr. George Yilmaz. Public Utilities Department Head 1t.A 03/14/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to consider a request from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for Collier County to serve as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City, Utilities system. OBJECTIVE: To receive direction on the request from FDEP that Collier County consider serving as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City Utilities (BCU). CONSIDERATIONS: On February 21, 2017, FDEP met with staff to discuss the condition of the ECU and to request that Collier County consider assisting in solving the problem. They identified that the potable water facility has been included in the existing wastewater complaint with the court, and that City management was anenable to work with FDEP on a plan to bring the utility back into compliance. FDEP noted that Collier County utilities has an exemplary record of delivering high quality water and wastewater services and is the closest utility provider that could manage the combined water/wastewater utility for the ECU. The concept of developing a temporary receivership agreement was put on the table for further consideration. The receivership option could be a provisional management vehicle until such time that a final solution is adopted. Ultimately, the ECU may reach a point that it is able to take back the management. Alternatively, other management structures via County Ordinance or Legislative action, considering the County itself, or a third -party Government Utility Authority may be adopted to properly manage the utility. On March 3, 2017, Collier County received a letter from FDEP formally requesting assistance and cooperation from Collier County Public Utilities (Attachment 1). The receivership concept for a period of up to two years, would allow all interested parties time establish an entity that would best serve the County's and the City's interests. The temporary nature of the receivership may also allow for the solicitation and expenditure of available state funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of the water and wastewater facility infrastructure. As a condition of accepting a temporary receivership agreement, staff and the County Attorney would seek appropriate indemnification and would identify a sufficient funding plan. At this time, staff is only seeking Board approval to begin discussion with FDEP to refine the eouccpt. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the General Fund (001.) for the initial legal ECU receivership and general support up to $10,000 for special legal counsel expertise. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None specific to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board (1) Considers the FDEP request for Collier County to serve as a temporary receiver, among other options, for the Everglades City Utilities; (2) directs staff to work with FDEP and bring back appropriate action items in the near future 'Cor Board action; (3) authorizes the County Attorney to retain special legal counsel to assist and provide needed legal expertise in this process; and (4) encourages the City of Everglades City to work Packet Pg. 264 cooperatively with I'DEP and EPA to resolve the utility's non-eompliance. Prepared By: G. George Yilmaz, Public I;tilities Department Head Joseph Bellone, Director, IFinancial Operations Support Division ATTACIIMFNT(S) 1. FDEP Letter - Everglades Clty-3-3-17 (PDF) 11.D 03/14/2017 [Packet Pg. 285 March 3. 2017 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 Mr. [,co I-,. Ochs, it, County Manager County Manager's Office 32991'arroarm Trail Fast, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34112-5746 lk i' Re: Everglades City Utilities Dear Mr. Ochs. Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Ryan E. Mathews Interim Secretary We appreciated the opportunity to discuss the referenced project with Collier County staff on February 21. The Department shared that the potable water facility has been included in the existing Waste Water treatment facility Complaint with the Court. We also explained the funding limitations that have arisen from the non-compliance issues. Finally, we discussed paths forward to ensure the affected citizens are provided safe and reliable water and wastewater scrvicc. The County has the opportunity to guide the future for the combined water/wastewater utility for the City and surrounding unincorporated areas. The various options will take some time to vet, but conditions at the facilities wart -ant a more expedited timetable for action, fhe Department is working with the City to voluntarily turn over, through a current Court proceeding, the facilities and assets to a receiver. A receiver could be a management entity (Special Board) created by County Ordnance or Legislative action, the County itself, or a third -party Government Utility Authority. The major concern for any receiver is the Potential monetary liability involved with the facility. The wastewater facility is under a Consent Order for essentially a complete rebuilding effort, Mr. Leo E. Ochs. Jr. County Manager March 3, 2017 lln,e 2 of During our discussions, the concept DI'the County serving as temporary receiver evolvekL This could be the best option for several reasons. The Collier County Utilities department is ol*the finest in the State, and is very capable of assuming an oversight management role quickly to ensure continued service to the residents. As a temporary receiver for a period of up to two years, a Utility authority could be created that would best serve the County's, interests. The temporary nature of the receivership may also allow for the solicitation and expenditure Of available state funds for the replacement of the wastewater facility infrastructure. The Department requests the County consider serving as a temporary receiver for the Everglades City Utilities by directing staff to vet this option with us to help the Commission determine if it is an appropriate path forward. Sincerely, Jun M. Iglehart Director of District Management JMI/JC/ise PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -G FLORIDA DEP COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2017 10 Pages February 17, 2017 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 5outhD1str1ct@dev. state. N, us The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Mayor Everglades City PO Box 110 Everglades City, FL 34139 mayorhamiltongaol. com Re: Compliance Inspection Everglades City WTP PWS #5110089 Collier County Dear Honorable Hamilton, Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Ryan E. Matthews Interim Secretary Department personnel conducted a compliance inspection of the above -referenced facility on February 13, 2016. The inspection report details the items of non-compliance that need to be ad- dressed. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact Ryan Snyder at (239) 344- 5695, or via e-mail at: rvan.snyder&dgp.state.fl.us. Sincerely, Jennifer Carpenter Assistant Director South District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosure: Inspection Report ec: Tim Stephens; timstenhensna,embargmail.com Dottie Joiner; dsmallwood@citvofeverglades.org www.dep.state.fl.us Compliance Inspection Form page i Date of Inspection: February 13, 2017 Water System: Everelades City System Type: Community System PWS #: 5110089 System Address: 24940 SR 29, Copeland FL 34137 Owner Name: Everglades City Owner Address: P.O. Box 110, Everglades City FL, 34139 Owner Phone: 239-695-3791 Owner Cell: 239-695-2758 _Owner Fax: 239-695-2350 Owner Email: ma orhamilton a aol.com Primary Contact Name: Dottie Joiner Primary Contact Address: P.O. Box 110, Everglades City FL, 34139 Primary Contact Phone: Primary Contact Cell: Primary Contact Fax: Primary Contact Email: dsmallwoodga chyofeverglades.ore Operator Required? ®Yes ❑No(if "No", Operator Section Not Applicable) Operator Name: Tim Stephens Operator Phone: 239-595-5030 Operator Email: timstephens8467pgmail.com %Compliance Inspection Form AREAS OF CONCERN Operator stated that the wells have no auxiliary power in the event of a power failure. All community water system serving, or designed to serve, 350 or more persons or 150 or more connections shall provide standby power in accordance with Rule 62-555.320(14), Florida Administrative Code. (F.A.C.). Please provide proper standby power for the wells. 2. The well apron (well pad) is not constructed appropriately (please see picture #8 and #9). At a minimum, the well apron should be at least six feet by six feet and at least four inches this with the well in the center (three feet of concrete on all sides of the well head). One side of the well pad is shorter than three feet. Rule 62- 532.500(4)(c), F.A.C. 3. There is a valve between the raw waterline and treated water that could potentially allow untreated water to bypass treatment (please see photo # 10). Please remove the valve to eliminate the possibility of untreated water bypassing treatment and being feed into the distribution system. Rule 62-555.350(1), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in December 5, 2014, April 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 4. Transfer Pump #1 located at the water treatment plant was leaking a significant amount of water from the packing gland (please see photo #12). Please repair the packing gland. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in April 1, 2016 and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. Transfer Pump #2 located at the water treatment plant was broken at the time of inspection. Department staff noted that there is no back up pump and that the pump is not scheduled for repair. Operator stated that it could take six to eight weeks for the pump to be repaired. If Transfer Pump #1 (the only functioning pump) stops working, then the city will not have water. Please repair the pump so that there is redundancy within the system. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 5. The operator stated that the loss of chlorine alarm at the plant is not functioning. The rule states that any community water system that is designed to serve 350 or more persons or 150 or more connections shall provide an audio-visual alarm system. Please repair the system to function as intended. Rule 62- 555.320(13)(b)12, F.A.C. and Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 6. The dashboard meter for pH and Chlorine Residual at the Nano Filtration skid were malfunctioning and need to be repaired (please see picture #11). The operator is doing bench tests for pH and Chlorine Residual. Please repair the dashboard meter in the Nano Filtration skid. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in April 1, 2016 and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. "Compliance Inspection Form Department staff observed the concentrate from the membrane skid being discharged onto the ground from the concentrate equalization tank overflowing. In addition, there is evidence that the concentrate has been discharged on the ground in the past from overfilling (staining on the side of the tank) and from the dump line located at the bottom of the tank as well (please see pictures # 1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). Concentrate shall not be disposed of on the ground and be disposed of in the Camestown lift station as stated in permit # 315455 -001 - WC. The operator stated that the concentrate discharge line going from the water treatment plant to the domestic wastewater collection system has significant build-up inside the pipes, and the pump trips off due to high back pressure when the water plant is operated at high production capacity. The operator also stated that the piping has blown from excessive pressure in the past. Please repair or replace the lines and properly dispose of the concentrate as stated within your permit. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. and DEP Permit No. 315455 -001 -WC 8. The water level gauge on the side of the Copeland ground storage tank was not functioning at the time of inspection (please see picture #6). Please repair the gauge so that it is functioning as intended. Rule 62- 555.350(2), F.A.C. I. High service pump #2 was the only functioning pump at the booster plant at the time of inspection. The ground storage circulation pumps, the two jockey pumps, and the other high service pump and controls for the pumps was in disrepair (please see photo #15, #16, #17, #18, and 419). There is an onsite generator as well that was stated as being insufficient to power the functioning high service pump in the case of a power failure. The operator did state that the diesel -powered pump does work and is usually used when the Fire Department is testing their hoses in the distribution system. Without having all pumps functioning, the pressure within the distribution system can vary greatly and has the potential to fall below 20 psi. In addition, If the only functioning high service pump stops working, then the city will not have water. Please repair all the pumps within the booster station so that system functions as intended and the generator will need to be upgraded to power the booster station in the case of an emergency. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C., Rule 62-555.320(15)(a)2, F.A.C, Rule 62-555.320(14)(x), F.A.0 Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in December 5, 2014, April 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 10. There were two leaks observed in the booster plant. One leak was located within a check valve and the other was located on piping traveling along the roof line (Please see photo #13 and #14). Please repair the leaks. Rule 62-555350(2), F.A.C. 11. The operator stated that no one is doing an annual check of the ground storage tanks hatches or screening. Ground storage tanks shall be checked at least annually to ensure that hatches are closed and screens are in place. Please start conducting this annual check of the ground storage tanks. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 12. The monthly operation reports for the facility indicate it is routinely operating above 75 percent of its capacity and on occasion operating over it permitted compacity. When a system exceeds 75 percent of the total permitted maximum -day operating capacity of the plant, the supplier of water shall submit source/treatment/storage capacity analysis reports to the Department in accordance with Rule 62-555.348, F.A.C. 13. Department records indicate your facility generated a monitoring and reporting violation for not performing the required testing for the Nitrate, Nitrite, and the Volatile Organics Group of contaminants which was required to be performed sometime during the 2016 calendar year, per Rules 62-550.512, F.A.C. and Rule 62- 550.515, F.A.C. The Department sent the facility a compliance assistance offer letter on February 8, 2017 requiring the facility to perform public notice by March 8, 2017. Please perform this public notice as directed `;t . F '<'Compliance Inspection Form by the February 8, 2017 compliance assistance offer letter. 14. The operator stated that there is no preventative maintenance plan for the water treatment plant. Please create and/or maintain a preventive maintenance plan in accordance with Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. 15. The implementation of the cross -connection control program for the City water system was not evident at the time of the inspection. In addition, the system shall review its current program to ensure it meets the requirements for the revised Cross -Connection Control Rule. Please provide the Department with documentation showing that the City is ensuring cross connections are controlled on a continuing basis (i.e. testing of backflow preventers in accordance with the City's Cross -Connection Control Plan) and that is meeting the requirement of Rule 62-555.360(2), F.A.0 Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in December 5, 2014, April 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 16. There was no flushing program or isolation valve exercising program during the time of inspection. Please provide a copy of these plans and documentation showing that programs are being completed to the Department. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in December 5, 2014, April 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 17. At the time of inspection, there was no emergency response plan available for inspection. Please provide a copy of the emergency response plan and maintain this documentation in the plant at all times and in accordance with Rule 62-555.350(15), F.A.C. Additional note on item above: This item has been mentioned in December 5, 2014, April 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016 inspection reports. Department has received no response—this is a continuing area of non-compliance. 18. At the time of inspection, there was no distribution map. The facility shall have, and thereafter maintain, an up-to-date map of their drinking water distribution system. Such a map shall show the location and size of water mains if known; the location of valves and fire hydrants; and the location of any pressure zone boundaries, pumping facilities, storage tanks, and interconnections with other public water systems. 62- 555.350(14), F.A.C. 19. At the time of inspection there were no records maintained at the plant. Please provide the Department reassurance that facility records are being maintained in accordance with Rule 62-550.720, F.A.C. 20. The operator stated that no maintenance has been done on the generators. Preventive maintenance on auxiliary power sources shall be performed in accordance with the equipment manufacturer's recommendations or in accordance with a written preventive maintenance program established by the supplier of water; however, in no case shall auxiliary power sources be run under load less frequently than monthly. Please conducted preventative maintenance on the generators. Rule 62-555.350(2), F.A.C. REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The facility has had and action level exceedance for lead during sampling conducted in October 2016. The facility had a 90"' percentile result of .0170 mg/L and a max result of .0640 mg/L with the action level for lead Compliance Inspection Form being 0.015 mg/L. The Department sent out a letter on October 31, 2016 notifying the system of milestones that are required to be completed. Please follow the timetables mentioned in that October 31, 2016 letter. 2. The sodium hypochlorite and ammonia sulfate is not being used at the booster station and the chemicals are currently just sitting there (please see picture #20 and #21). These chemicals are breaking down. If these treatments are started back up again at the booster plant, then the chemicals will need to be replaced prior to use. PHOTOS 1. Concentrate equalization tank. Yellow arrow pointing toward discharging/ overflowing onto ground. y Concentrate equalization tank. Yellow arrow pointing toward discharging/ overflowing onto ground. Red arrowing pointing toward staining on tank from past occurrences. `, �%3Compliance Inspection Form 3. Backside of concentrate equalization tank. 4. Discharge piping from concentrate equalization tank. Note ground disturbance from tank being emptied onto ground. 5. Ground next to discharge piping from concentrate equalization tank. Note ground disturbance from tank being emptied onto 7. Pumping equipment to transfer concentrate to lift station. Sulfuric acid was added to assist in removal of blockage in pipe. 6. Copeland ground storage tank. Yell( pointing toward broken level gauge. 8. Well #6. Yellow arrow denoting less than 3 feet from well head. arrow WX�Compliance Inspection Form A'nZ.. WCompliance Inspection Form 15. Nonfunctioning panel at booster Recirculation pumps at booster plant that are nonfunctional M N" 17. Jockey pumps at booster plant that are 18. High service pump at booster plant that is nonfunctional nonfunctional ts- i '"-W'Compliance Inspection Form Inspectors Signature:Title: EM Date: 02/15/2017 1 m L.r S . a .4 20. Ammonium sulfate feed system that is not used at 19. Control panel for pumps at booster plant. Controls are nonfunctioning and pump is left booster plant. in hand all the time. voz S y Y�� 21. Chemical feed pumps at booster plant that are 22. Diesel powered high service pump at booster not used. station. Inspectors Signature:Title: EM Date: 02/15/2017 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4-11 FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION EMAIL EVERGLADES CITY WATER SYSTEM CRITICAL NEEDS JANUARY 20, 2017 4 Pages Debra Hogue C:2 ✓ ti From: Dawn Barnard Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 8:37 AM To: Debra Hogue Subject: FW: Everglades City Visit 1-18-17 Attachments: EC, DWS.Critical.Needs. List. 100516.pdf Please file E City under Water From: David Haring [mailto•David HaringC@frwa.net] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:08 PM To: Dawn Barnard; Ron Benson Cc: 'Sammy Hamilton'; dsmaliwood(a cityofeverglades.org; 'Jason Sparks'; 'Gary Williams' Subject: Everglades City Visit 1-18-17 Ms. Barnard, It was a pleasure meeting you and Dr. Benson at the Everglades City WTP this past Wednesday. I understand things on the WW side are a higher priority to the City at the moment, but we must not let the drinking water system fall by the wayside. I have seen little to no improvements to the WTP or Booster Pump Station since my initial visit back in August 2016. 1 am under the impression there will be little or no funding considered for DW improvements until reasonable assurance is provided that the City will properly staff, operate and maintain the DW utilities in accordance with Fiscal Sustainability and Asset Management Practices while meeting all local, state and federal rules and regulations in a consistent manner and an ongoing basis. For some time now, and at least since August when I first visited the facilities, there has been only one operational transfer pump at the WTP which itself needs considerable rehab/replacement. This transfer pump also has a history of frequently tripping out. Currently the City relies on phone calls from customers complaining about low water pressure to inform them of these instances. Also, at the Booster Station there is only one high service pump operational. Should either of these pumps fail the City will lose its ability to provide water to its customers, leaving the City and its customers in dire straits until a workable solution can be found. The minimum system requirement is to have two such functional pumps online at these facilities at all times. Additionally, at the Booster Station it appears none of the jockey pumps or recirculation pumps are in operation either. The control panel for these pumps is in pretty bad shape, so likely it is the weak/broken link in that chain. An electrician would need to make that determination and provide the proper resolution. I believe we all understand the importance of this matter and hope that there will be two operational pumps at the pressure booster station and WTP as soon as possible - as well as begin the work to determine the actual cause and resolution of the inoperability of the jockey and recirculation pumps. As you are aware, the R.O. concentrate was flowing onto the ground and subsequently flowing into the surrounding properties during our WTP visit on Wednesday. This has been the case during my every visit since August as well. Also during our most recent visit to the WTP, the emergency generator had a dead battery and it could not be determined if/when the generator is exercised and/or maintained on any kind of regular or scheduled basis. Ideally, we would see a more pro -active approach to maintaining the City's facilities and infrastructure going forward as it would provide FDEP and other regulatory entities assurances that any funding in the way of loans or grants would be properly used and funded projects cared for throughout the terms of financial assistance. I have again attached FRWA's critical needs assessment for your convenience, but I am sure your firm has or will complete its own assessment as well. We are currently on track to complete the City's Asset Management Plan within the next 4-6 weeks. I will remain available and will be in touch with you periodically throughout the process. I look forward to working with you as well as the Hole Montes team as the projects progress. Should you need to reach me for any reason, please feel free. David Haring I Utility Asset Management I Florida Rural Water Association a 20 0 yOj {Op p O ocw 4 m w a h O O Y N L Z E j o W Z y W 0 N O 4 O yOj {Op p O O O N ry ^ O U f w w w w w w N h c N C ^ N 2 w w w w O O O O Q ^ a m o - ^ J w w w w !+ y O U O O O O O ^ N ^ O ^ N 7 w w w w w Z O Q 6 � W uU LL � U Z W a Y U W d a o 0 Y Z x mmC aOI �E� N N O o a h- `m Q W E r N O W N E Z w 'pp x J Q tL w o a.—E, E . g. Q O o 0 c 10 x N.� Zga c6 Z = m o W tnzow> yo z gv G ¢ a 2 G€O aw E 0 2 >E O N O W . 0 O cc YW5>° > .. o K oz m z zy �N. 0o awzo.a O 0-0 O m 'oOE - Om OW n£02 h - w c y Ka wLLo N ca O 'r wo U wc �ZEwoU nE0 OU wd Wyvq QO ucuEz > W ?j £ n i, N OFmZEaNK> z¢ a ui O c E0w U- N 3 -- NxELZ 5 -0 mF:' z U \E vnMWM,oNt , ao J J V 2 O + y j O J� O N 0mm m O W N W LL u -O i W W Z m m n W W �, (O w v v v D v> O N '° o+ Z m m <025 > a w I v� N z LL o v a o O 00 w E Z ac E v o W !R Z w = >.Z Q c m E. z w �'ua��� P ro v W m m x> c > rnE vW W ai n t E o w Q zI.� c a o cwHN z� N v� Q c rno I- o' S v v C , w m = Z Ci Gl Uv' a m V 0 F m 9 {`-¢Y'1 J j O~ C7 v-LgFy m U W tN K G wVQwW aU ii ''1UawH 1�J�1JJ o'u�v E F 0 c 0 OU o E dm o c a' K a S o a 5 �' m c' v 'N v m c n z a. w 6 u n G w w k a a> a m a Z Z .. O= m O o U� n00 at a Z I- m E Mz S g E= o v 41 ud' 'T `m w � Z' qto N O N N ^ a r m r j z wO 2 z Q Zz o ii l Q U K W U Ng LLZZ� tt O N U U S W o 0 O 0 0 O N N r W W N 'N W qG E d O T N K W y ~Wz A U r j x U O w W a o O O � m W w y W J 5 5 Wma > U aN 0 Z w Z 0 0 w Q cS W W5 Z y Y a 0 zov 3 a am c Q W W Q a U ~ y S F'Q K W t Q O N 5 w ¢2o zFz Q i N W w EW c z � n a n J LL O E w z_ O a w d K 0 Q O Z U o rn a 0 a N vE K LL a ra Q r W Q K U p S d W W g E o O d o w U Wpp w 0 O C O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 O o «i of v v ri o" o' O U A H Iq W W M H N W H V1 W N O O O O O O O O `a N C y O N O O O (O O N O r J !9 E9 N e9 (9 Y Ud V O O N O O N O O O O ai O O o O O o O N c O O C W M W N f9 W M f9 0 W m O w n 4 O c w a W -W�, . t K h x o w W a W v O m O H w U m o, U D a at0i z h O h N z O U a O w a 2 LL a W K LL n a Y° U E OZFO a OU a Cn �� Ud V w J J O U , yn d N❑ FF tZt K Z N Y �-' > a cU0¢ $ W z co 5 Q O Q o. w w> 3 o z p op W F r E— w W b j a m z= w? "' p ~ w > LL ua. d> a z W m. a > U E> J n a o Fy LL Or o a W w O N W Q Z c Z Iw- 0 W O K J W Q~ z Z W p m 2 N w -O =� U y�p0. z� 0a IL(D W Z p, 0'a (� z Q r Z U1 0 0� O wm O Qm O a. ' J Q`O Y p Q {y nE n Z a 2 w o w o Q a o w w v y w o F w w S U z Q V Y w W m d W 'ili a N v K 0 g E W W N J O W ^2 W Y ¢U¢ J U U O t Y LL N OJ W p. O 'pN, y Z W a W O d W o Qm m$ w K Z a s$ °p0 W > (=j K U W p "o'a °Fm g� �� tt 3 Q W LL O m :t 3 ob `m `o Om Q `oa aXNX rNXX a a LL Q O aE Q a 0 O W m N K O W m W m K N a K K ? K vow K io D a. O ? alla 0 0 O N N r W W N 'N W qG E d O T N K W y ~Wz A U r j x U O w W a o O O � m W w y W J 5 5 Wma > U aN 0 Z w Z 0 0 w Q cS W W5 Z y Y a 0 zov 3 a am c Q W W Q a U ~ y S F'Q K W t Q O N 5 w ¢2o zFz Q i N W w EW c z � n a n J LL O E w z_ O a w d K 0 Q O Z U o rn a 0 a N vE K LL a ra Q r W Q K U p S d W W g E o O d o w U Wpp w i PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -I HOLE MONTES REPORT ON WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY SYSTEM A BRIEFING TO CONSIDER POSSIBLE RISK APRIL 4, 2016 24 Pages City of Everglades City, Collier County, Florida Water and Wastewater Utility System A briefing to consider possible risk April 4, 2016 Prepared for: G. George Yilmaz, Ph.D., P.E. Public Utilities Department Collier County Government Prepared by: Ronald E. Benson, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Senior Vice President/Principal Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 34110 April 4, 2016 Executive Summa Collier County Public Utilities contracted with Hole Montes, Inc. to prepare an overview of the major issues/risks which a governmental entity might be faced with in the event they were to become responsible for the City of Everglades City Utility system. The scope of this assignment is rather limited and the intent was the findings reported herein would be at the order of magnitude level of detail based on the information sources provided by the County. If further consideration is deemed warranted, then an assessment of the utility system would need to be performed in order to assess the condition, future service life of existing systems, and potential capacity of existing systems to serve future customers, etc. One major consideration in this sort of overview of major issues/risks is, in the event Collier County were to be the entity taking over this utility, that it is the County's standard requirement that utility systems are required to be brought up to County standards as a condition of acceptance. It is understood that, in general, the City of Everglades City did not construct nor has maintained their system to this standard. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that a significant cost would be associated with bringing the system up to the County standards. Another major consideration is that two of the four communities served by the City of Everglades City water system are not currently served by the sanitary sewer system. It is believed that, in general, the existing homes in these areas are likely contributing to pollution of the environment surrounding them through wastewater percolating from septic tank drain fields. In addition, it may be difficult for vacant lots in these communities to be permitted for new on- site treatment/disposal systems. It may also be possible that Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) or other agencies may at some time mandate connection of these onsite systems to a central sanitary sewer system. While the past and current enforcement actions by FDEP against the City of Everglades City may have moved forward slowly over the years, due to the limited financial ability of the City of Everglades City, it is likely that Collier County would not be given as much understanding and time. A major consideration for potable water systems is the ability to provide sufficient fire protection for the communities being served. While, the ability of the existing fire hydrants to supply a minimum level of fire protection is uncertain, it is likely that many of the water lines may be of smaller size than would be permitted today. It is unlikely that Collier County government could overlook such shortcomings in the ability of the existing water system to meet current fire protection standards which are being applied throughout the rest of the County. Due to the limited scope of this engagement and rather short time available to perform this overview of major issues/risks, the format of this report is to present a series of items which were able to be discovered using the documents provided to Hole Montes, Inc. by Collier County which were supplemented by documents Hole Montes was able to obtain from FDEP, Big Cypress Basin, as well as through an internet search using Google.com. (A copy of these documents have been provided.) The only on-site investigation of any sort consisted of a windshield survey in order to confirm the understanding of the utility system which was otherwise obtained by the various written materials. Neither record drawings, nor inventory list of major system components, were made available for the existing utility system. The most recent Water and Wastewater Master Plan prepared for the City of Everglades City was obtained and did not include such detailed information, so estimating lengths of pipelines of unknown 1 April 4, 2016 size, material of construction, or age was necessary and is only an order of magnitude estimate of the system's major components. It was deemed that in the event Collier County were to take over this system that conditions such as overflow of untreated or partially treated wastewater to the environment simply could not be allowed. This is the standard which Collier County Public Utilities applies throughout their system and the standard expected by FDEP. Therefore, in situations where such problems have been reported in the past by FDEP and other agencies, the direction has been taken to assume that whatever is needed to remediate such problems will be required as a minimum. The existing water system is estimated to supply potable water to approximately eight hundred residential housing units (single family, multi -family, mobile homes) plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units- in denser park -type setting having private water distribution and sanitary sewer collection systems. Based on the assumptions provided herein, it is assumed that approximately five hundred additional residential housing units may be served by this water utility through build -out (with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent). The existing sanitary sewer system is estimated to serve approximately five hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. It is assumed that the system will be expanded to serve all of Plantation Island and all of Chokoloskee accounting for an additional eight hundred residential housing units added to the sanitary sewer system through build -out (with an associated growth in commercial customers thru buildout on the order of 20 to 30 percent). No attempt to estimate the rate of population growth or timing for extending sanitary sewer service to existing areas is included in this briefing. The following is an order of magnitude estimate of costs which may be reasonably anticipated in the event that the City of Everglades City system was to be expanded and upgraded as identified herein. Based on the limited review and analysis, which constituted the scope of this work assignment, the following breakdown of potential future expenditures is provided below. The higher end of the range for each major system component assumes both build -out of the system as well providing a system meeting standards typical of those for the Collier County Public Utilities system. It is likely these expenditures could be phased over a ten year period, although no attempt to consider priorities has been included at this early stage. The costs provided herein has been divided into ten major categories and an order of magnitude range of potential costs necessary to address likely issues/risks was prepared for each. ➢ Water Supply $0.5 million to $1 million ➢ Water Treatment $1 million to $2.5 million ➢ Water Transmission $2 million to $5 million ➢ Water Distribution $3 million to $8 million ➢ Wastewater Collection $5 million to $9 million ➢ Wastewater Transmission $2 million to $5 million ➢ Wastewater Treatment $10 million to $12 million ➢ Wastewater Reuse $1.5 million to $2.5 million ➢ Wastewater Disposal $1 million to $6 million ➢ Telemetry and Control $2 million to $4 million Range of Total Potential Cost $30 million to $55 million April 4, 2016 Overview of the City of Everelades City's Water and Wastewater System Customer Base TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime during 2010. This report was presented to the Big Cypress Basin sometime in early 2011 along with a request for a grant to assist with funding construction of water supply wells. The following is a summary prepared from this report with regard to identifying the service area and major components of the City of Everglades City's Water and Wastewater System [here after will be referred to as City's W/WW System]. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water and wastewater service to the residents of the City of Everglades City. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water and wastewater service to a portion of the residents of community of Copeland. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water service to the residents of the community of Plantation Island. ITEM: The City's W/WW System provides water service to the residents of the community of Chokoloskee Island and provides wastewater service to a portion of the residents. ITEM: In 2010, potable water needs within the City's W/WW System were met using wells drawing from the surficial aquifer [shallow] which at the time were identified as "not able to meet current drinking water regulations for disinfection and disinfection by products." ITEM: Reclaimed water from the treatment of wastewater generated within the City's W/WW System was "utilized throughout the City for irrigation of medians and residential lawns." ITEM: The City's W/WW System consists of a low pressure wastewater collection system. ITEM: The "existing wastewater treatment facility is in need of extensive repairs." ITEM: Although the City's W/WW System "does not currently serve all areas of Plantation Island, Copeland and Chokoloskee Island, all of these areas were included in the demand projections for planning purposes." The estimates for the population within the City's W/WW System were between 1,367 and 1,436 people in 2005, between 1,523 and 1,561 people for 2010, and between 1,616 and 1,767 for 2015. ITEM: "A detailed land use and parcel analysis was completed to verify the existing and build out populations" for the City's W/WW System and are summarized below from the TetraTech report [Table 2-2 on page 2-4]. April 4, 2016 Area Existing Single Family Existing Mobile Homes Total Residential Housing Units Chokoloskee 170 300 470 Everglades City 250 130 380 Copeland 85 --- 85 Plantation 140 --- 140 TOTAL 645 430 1,075 ITEM: The TetraTech report suggested that the combination of 1,075 residential housing units, 2.08 persons per housing unit, and 33% unoccupied housing units (per 2000 census) accounts for an existing population of 1,475 persons which is very similar to the population estimates they reported previously. ITEM: The permanent population was adjusted by adding 20% in order to estimate the total of permanent and seasonal residents. In addition, an in -fill rate was assumed for the vacant lots, resulting in the projected total of permanent and seasonal population to be estimated - as summarized below per the TetraTech report [Table 2-4 on page 2-5]. Year Permanent plus Seasonal Population 2010 1,770 persons 2015 2,003 persons 2020 2,266 persons 2025 2,563 persons 2030 2,900 persons ITEM: [This population appears to be inflated.] Appendix A provides what appears to be information taken from a Water Use Permit application which seems to have used a population served for the water system of between 2,648 and 2,678 persons between 1999 and 2009 [table 9 on page 10 of Appendix A]. ITEM: Appendix A provides a month by month summary of "net quantity of finished water produced" for the period January 2009 thru January 2010. The monthly average finished water was between a low of 159,100 gallons per day (September 2009) and a high of 272,200 gallons per day (April 2009). The annual average was about 203,000 gallons per day or 74 million gallons per year [Refer to table 4 on page 4 of Appendix A]. April 4, 2016 ITEM: Divide the maximum monthly flow (272,200 gallons per day in April) by the 2010 total of permanent and seasonal population (1,770 people) yeilds 154 gallons per person per day. Divide the minimum monthly flow (159,100 gallons per day in September) by the 2010 permanent population (1,475 people) yeilds 108 gallons per person per day. The higher flow per capita during tourist season may be due to the influence of day -tourists visiting attractions (boating, fishing, etc.). TetraTech prepared a Utility Revenue Review for the City of Everglades City dated June 2011. The following is a summary prepared from this report with regard to identifying the service area and major components of the City's W/WW System. ITEM: "The City of Everglades City system provides service to the City, Plantation Island, Chokoloskee and Copeland." The 2000 Census population was provided by TetraTech [Attachment C]. Area Population (2000 Census) Everglades City 479 Plantation Island 202 Chokoloskee 404 Copeland 32 TOTAL 1,117 It appears that this 2000 population of 1,117 should be compared to the 2010 population of 1,475 provided in the 2010 TetraTech report as identified above. ITEM: The FY 2009 actual revenues reported for the City of Everglades City utility system were total Water Charges of $336,432/year and total Sewer Charges of $324,380, exclusive of various fees [page 3 of 13]. ITEM: The current [at the time of the June 2011 report] typical water bill for the City of Everglades City was represented as being $13.00 per month, with each typical customer reported as using less than 3,000 gallons per month, which is the base rate charged for a residential customer [page 9 of 13]. The base charge for commercial customers was also reported as $13.00 per month. The consumption charge for water was reported as $4.00 per 1,000 gallons for both residential and commercial customers (for consumption greater than 3,000 gallons per month). ITEM: If we assume that there are approximately 1,000 total water customers and each is charged $13.00 per month then we get a total of [1,000 customers] x [$13.00/month] x [12 months/year] _ $156,000/year. This would suggest that the revenue generated from the consumption charge would be the difference between total revenue of $336,432/year and $156,000, or approximately $180,000 per year. At the rate of $4.00 per 1,000 gallons, this is equal to about 45 million April 4, 2016 gallons per year billed above the amount included in the minimum charge of $13.00 per month. Assuming that approximately 300 customers out of a total 1,000 customers use over the 3,000 gallons per month minimum level then we might assume that these 300 customers are using an average on the order of 16,000 gallons per month, while the other 700 customers used on the order of 3,000 gallons per month. Without any details, this is the best we can do in estimating the possible number of customers served by this utility and consumption for a typical customer. This calculation was only done in order to attempt to better understand the number of customers served by the utility system. ITEM: The current [at the time of the June 2011 report] typical sewer bill for the City of Everglades City was represented as being $11.00 per month, which was the flat rate charged for each residential customer regardless of water usage [page 9 of 13]. Commercial customers are charged $18.00 per month plus $4.25 per 1,000 gallons for the first 5,000 gallons of water usage and then only $0.60 per 1,000 gallons for water usage above that. Based on the limited information available, it is difficult to understand the likely relationship between reported annual sanitary sewer system revenues, and the likely number of sewer customers. Conclusions: The following can be concluded from the information summarized above. ➢ Existing housing units (2015), based on review of aerial photos and tax maps, plus windshield survey were estimated. Housing units are considered to be single family, multi -family and mobile homes (not in high density parks). RV/Park Models are those which appear to be in a high density park which is likely to have a centralized system of private water/sewer connections for the park. Future units were estimated for areas which either have previously platted vacant lots or areas with a reasonable possibility of future development. These estimates have been provided for use in estimating size of the utility system in the order of magnitude costs to upgrade and expand the system. ➢ At this point, no information has been found to suggest how many customer connections there are to the City's water system and wastewater system. The revenue collected versus the suggestion that most customers are residential and using minimal quantities of water does not necessarily work out as we understand these statements and financial data. This is especially the case for sewer revenues and rates. Regardless, we might estimate Housing Units RV/Park Models Future Housing Units Total Everglades City 400 190 250 840 Chokoloskee 160 420 100 680 Plantation 140 0 100 240 Copeland 100 0 40 140 TOTAL 800 610 490 1,900 ➢ At this point, no information has been found to suggest how many customer connections there are to the City's water system and wastewater system. The revenue collected versus the suggestion that most customers are residential and using minimal quantities of water does not necessarily work out as we understand these statements and financial data. This is especially the case for sewer revenues and rates. Regardless, we might estimate April 4, 2016 that the water system may have on the order of 1,000 customers and sewer system may have on the order of 600 customers. No conclusions have been made regarding existing and potential future water and sewer rates, other than a previous report by TetraTech indicates that rates were too low to support the expense of operating the existing system and that considerably higher rates may not be able to support likely levels of future debt service which will be needed to upgrade the system to meet minimum regulatory standards. It seems reasonable to assume that the City's water system may be serving a community with a total permanent and seasonal population on the order of 1,750 people. It seems reasonable to assume that the City's water system may be expanded to eventually serve as many as approximately 3,000 people (total of permanent and seasonal population). The typical residential customer is likely using less than 3,000 gallons per month of water and living in either manufactured housing or a mobile home. In some cases, the density of these housing units is rather high, although the service area is rather spread out over four generally independent communities which are tied together by water and wastewater transmission systems based on a centralized water treatment facility and centralized wastewater treatment facility. These backbone water and wastewater transmission lines are critically important for a variety of reasons. - Remainder of page intentionally left blank- April 4, 2016 Overview of the City of Everelades City's Water and Wastewater System — Infrastructure Water System TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime during 2010. This report provided information regarding the major infrastructure comprising the City's WIWW System. ITEM: The City's water system "provides service to the City of Everglades City, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and parts of Copeland." [page 3-11 ITEM: [This statement is for the previously existing situation.] "The existing system consists of a water treatment plant located in Copeland that includes three water supply wells, a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, aeration, and chloramination. The existing water treatment facility is rated for a maximum daily demand of 0.504 MGD." [page 3-1] ITEM: "From the main water treatment plant, water is pumped approximately 7 miles through an existing 8 -inch PVC water main to the City of Everglades City. The City has a water booster station located in the City of Everglades City that includes a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, chloramination and high service pumps." [page 3-1] ITEM: There were a number of deficiencies identified for the water system based on an inspection by TetraTech in April 2010. These deficiencies are not repeated here as a number of them have already been addressed (referred to as Phase I and Phase 11). ITEM: In addition to what later became known and Phase I (wells) and Phase II (water treatment plant) improvements, TetraTech identified a category they called "Maintenance Improvements... In addition, it is recommended that the CIP include $500,000 every five years for water system maintenance or renewal and replacement projects. Typically these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments." The list of example projects suggest that the portions of the existing water treatment plant and booster pump station which were being utilized along with the Phase I and Phase II improvements are in need of significant repairs and due to financial limitations were addressed by spreading a total of $2,000,000 over a period of twenty years. [page 8-4] FDEP Permit Number 315455 -001 -WC was issued on January 31, 2013 to upgrade the existing water treatment plant. ITEM: "Upgrade to the existing water treatment plant. A new facility with enhanced treatment is needed because of poor well water quality and poor finished water quality. This project will add new treatment facilities including new Nanofiltration (NF) process trains, control system, chemical feed systems and interconnecting piping to the two new raw water wells." April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The maximum day operation capacity of the NF plant is 465,000 gpd and consists of the following." 1. New sulfuric acid feed system 2. New scale inhibitor feed system 3. Two cartridge filters 4. Two membrane feed pumps 5. Dual Nanofiltration (NF) system (175 gpm each) 6. New hypochlorite feed system 7. New ammonium sulfate feed system 8. New sodium hydroxide feed system 9. New concentrate equalization tank (15,000 gallons) with pump (100 gpm) and air gap between the tank and the Carnestown lift station. 10. Existing aerator with storage tank (500,000 gallons) and dual high service pumps (capacity of 350 gpm each) will be part of the new facility. 11. The facility is located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive in Copeland. ITEM: "Following completion of the water treatment facility improvements, it is recommended that the City of Everglades City water system be interconnected with the Lee Cypress Co-op. The Lee Cypress water system serves approximately 250 homes and is not in compliance with drinking water regulations." Lee Cypress Co-op Water System — FDEP Monthly Operation Report for PWSs Treating Raw Ground Water... ITEM: The monthly operation report for Lee Cypress Co-op water system [PWS Identification Number: 5110058] for the month of February 2016 was obtained from FDEP. It identifies a total population served of 250 people and a total flow treated of 292,218 gallons over 29 days, or an average of 10,000 gallons per day. ITEM: The per capita water consumption of 40 gallons per day per person is on the lower end of the spectrum, but to put into perspective would be equal to 2,400 gallons per month for a household of two people and is on the same order of magnitude reported for the City of Everglades City water system of less than 3,000 gallons per month per residential connection. Audit of City of Everglades City Grant Agreement, SFWMD, dated June 12, 2014, identifies the Phase II Water Treatment Plant project and funding sources. ITEM: "The District entered into a grant agreement for $750,000 with the City of Everglades City on January 25, 2014, to cost share in Phase II of a Water Supply System Improvement Project." [page 1] ITEM: "The City of Everglades City also received a commitment of $2.3 million from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for the Phase II portion of the project." [page 1] April 4, 2016 ITEM: "Phase I consisted of planning and constructing two well pumps and connecting the new wells at the existing water treatment plant." [page 1] ITEM: "Phase II primarily involves the design and construction of a new filtration membrane system and a concentrate disposal pipeline to the City of Everglades City wastewater collection system." [page 1] ITEM: "Phase I has been completed and Phase 11 of the project is in process." [page 1 ] ITEM: "Our review of various procurement documents indicated that the City of Everglades City evaluated four contracts for Phase II construction and awarded the contract to DN Higgins for $2.45 million, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder." [page 6] A telephone call to an employee of DN Higgins confirmed the following: ITEM: The project consisted of the construction of a new water treatment facility at the current location, along with the upgrading of two wastewater lift stations (Copeland and Carnestown), and miscellaneous repairs to the wastewater treatment plant (aeration basin and clarifier). ITEM: Following the telephone call, and consideration of various other documents, it appears that the upgrades to the two wastewater lift stations was likely necessary to increase the capacity for transporting wastewater flow from Copeland to Carnestown to the City of Everglades City in order to handle the additional flow generated by the new water treatment plant concentrate [estimated here as about 15 percent of the finished water produced each day]. Completion of the new Wells and Water Treatment Plant construction projects per FDEP permit. ITEM: FDEP letter of June 21, 2013 acknowledging completion of the two drinking water wells and granting of request to place the wells into operation. ITEM: A Certification of Construction Completion and request for clearance to place permitted PWS components into operation form was prepared by Professional Engineer, Amon Rony Joel, dated November 20, 2014, and submitted to FDEP for the Water Treatment Plant project. ITEM: FDEP letter of December 8, 2014 acknowledging receipt of certification that the water treatment plant was completed in accordance with Permit Number 315455- 001 -WC dated January 30, 2013. A Compliance Assistance Offer letter was sent by FDEP to The Honorable Sammy Hamilton, Mayor, on January 5, 2015. ITEM: A Sanitary Survey Inspection Report for inspection on December 5, 2014 was sent along with an offer of assistance in resolving possible violations. The 10 April 4, 2016 Sanitary Survey included eleven "areas of concern" and two "recommendations." [pages 5 and 6] ITEM: Item #1 under "areas of concern" for the new water treatment plant was "It was stated that the recirculation pumps are currently not in operation... Please have these pumps repaired or replaced. [page 5] ITEM: Item #2 under "areas of concern" for the new water treatment plant was "The high service pumps #3 and #4 are nonfunctional at the booster station... Please repair or replace the pumps/controllers. [page 5] Windshield survey conducted on March 24, 2016. ITEM: Viewed from outside the fence, the Water Treatment Plant condition appears as would be expected based on the above statements regarding work recently having been completed. ITEM: Lee Cypress Co-op Water Treatment Plant was being attended by an individual [likely the operator] at the time we drove by. ITEM: There were fire hydrants generally throughout the Copeland area. There were fire hydrants generally throughout the City of Everglades City. There were a limited number of fire hydrants in Plantation Island. There were a limited number of fire hydrants in Chokoloskee. While no information was reviewed regarding the size of the potable water lines in these areas, it is anticipated that many of these fire hydrants may have limited flow capacity with the limitation being the size of water line providing water to them. Conclusions: ➢ It appears possible that in many areas the size of water lines may not be sufficient to meet today's fire protection needs (Collier County Development Standards). No review of record drawings or system schematics was performed. ➢ There are a large number of additional lots for which water service is likely to be needed in the future. Wastewater System TetraTech prepared a Water Management System Master Plan for the City of Everglades City sometime during 2010. This report provided information regarding the major infrastructure comprising the City's W/WW System. ITEM: "The Everglades City wastewater treatment system provides service to the incorporated areas of Everglades City and to portions of Copeland and Chokaloskee. Plantation Island is not served by the Everglades City wastewater system; however, because the residents of Plantation Island utilize septic tanks, extending wastewater service to this area would be a benefit to the region." [page 4-1] 11 April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The wastewater collection system includes approximately 245 grinder pump stations in the City of Everglades City, approximately 5 grinder pump stations in Chokoloskee, and two master pump stations (one in Chokoloskee and one in Copeland). All existing grinder pumps were manufactured by E/One, and all have a similar configuration with a check valve in the wetwell. Approximately fourteen (14) of the existing grinder pump stations are duplex and all other are simplex design. The collection system is fairly new and is generally in good condition." [page 4-1] Florida Rural Water Association — Undated letter from William F. Archebelle, Fiscal Sustainability Analyst, to Mayor Sammy Hamilton, City of Everglades City. ITEM: "There appears to be minimal gravity sewer in the collection system and our analysis of onsite manholes showed them to be in relatively good condition. Analysis of the actual gravity mains should be conducted via televising and smoke testing, but relatively little infiltration or inflow was noted during the evaluation of the gravity manholes." ITEM: "The collection system evaluation indicated that the majority of the lift stations in the City, with the exception of the following, are operating with only one functional pump or only one pump in actually place: • Everglades Isle (Both stations with two functional pumps) • Seaboard Villas • Barron Station • The Elementary School • Lake Cypress" ITEM: "FDEP regulations require that all lift stations have a minimum of two (2) operable pumps to provide redundant service should one pump fail. Not addressing this situation could eventually result in additional FDEP compliance action. A detailed analysis of each lift station in the City is included in the attached evaluation forms with specific information on missing or tailed pumps and other issues that may need to be addressed." [No evaluation forms were provided with this letter so none were able to be reviewed.] ITEM: "A list of stations with major issues other than failed or missing pumps is included below as these facilities have the potential for , or evidence of, Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) events: The Chokoloskee Island Master Lift Station was out of service, with all power tripped to the control panel. It is our understanding from discussions with field personnel that this is not an unusual occurrence. With no power to the control panel to activate the high water alarm the station was overflowing directly to the adjacent waterway, resulting in a Sanitary Sewer Overflow event (SSO). We informed your personnel that this event must be reported to the FDEP and appropriate remediation actions be taken in accordance with FDEP regulations. 12 April 4, 2016 When power was restored and the station pumps exercised, it was found that one pump is out of service. The second pump needs to be pulled, repaired, and returned to service as soon as possible. FRWA recommends the control panel for the station be repaired at the earliest opportunity, as failure of the station results in direct introduction of sewage into the environment in violation of State Law. We also recommend stairs or a ladder and platform be installed to provide access to the control panel as it is elevated for flood protection and is too high to be accessed from the ground. 2. The Estuary North Lift Station invert does not appear to be properly sealed into the wetwell and shows evidence of groundwater infiltration. The invert should be sealed, and any sand/soils should be cleaned from the bottom of the wetwell. Pump No. 2 was out of service. 3. The Partners Cove Lift Station pump discharge is leaking between the wetwell and the valve pit. The surrounding ground is saturated with raw sewage and the ground is beginning to subside. This potential SSO situation should be addressed immediately. Additionally, there is no Pump No. 2 installed in the station." ITEM: "We recognize the W WTF is near the end of its service life and ultimately needs to be replaced, but until that time, you are still required to operate in accordance with Florida Administrative Code and FDEP regulations. With that in mind, a list of issues noted at the plant, and potential regulatory issues are as follows:' ➢ "During our site visit it was observed that there is a significant lack of maintenance record keeping at the treatment plant. Several tanks and related equipment have deteriorated to the point of potential failure; including the aeration basins, clarifiers, and digesters as well as traveling bridge filter in which was out of service. Several blowers were no longer functioning and the Emergency generator does not appear to be operable. Much of the noted deterioration appears to be a direct result of a lack of property onsite maintenance." ➢ "It was also observed that recordkeeping was very poor. Daily log entries were very minimal as it pertains to operational controls, adjustments, and maintenance of the facility. All records were improperly filed in a shipping box without any regard to organization. The laboratory chemical tracking and inventory does not appear to be performed or documented." ➢ "...The Operating Protocols has not been update nor submitted along with the renewal for permit application." ➢ "...The operation and maintenance records are not being documented and needs to be updated and submitted along with the permit renewal." ➢ "...FAC 62-600.405 Capacity and Analysis Report has not been updated and submitted." 13 April 4, 2016 ITEM: "The wastewater treatment facility reuse system is not currently operating in compliance with State standards as required by Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rule 62-610." ➢ "...The sand filters were not in operation and are not functioning. As part of the reuse system filtration must be met to comply with TSS results below 5.0 mg/1. At the time of the visit the turbidity reading was over 20.0 NTU, which would equate to well over a 5.0 mg/1 TSS." ➢ "...Continuous monitoring of turbidity shall be applied to the operating protocols as a means of controlling operation of treatment facilities to ensure that only acceptable quality reclaimed water is released to the reuse system or to system storage." ➢ "...The proposed monitoring equipment, chlorine, pH and turbidity shall be calibrated according to the requirements." ITEM: "Parts of the treatment system (specifically the sand filters and several blowers) were not in service. The permittee of any reuse or land application system shall be responsible notification for periods of inactivation or abandonment of equipment. The permittee shall give the Department written notice at least 60 days before inactivation or abandonment of a reuse or land application system and shall specify what steps will be taken to safeguard public health and safety." ITEM: "Cross -connection control program requirements are contained in Chapter 62- 555, F.A.C. (c). As part of the permit application, the reclaim water systems must comply with a cross connection control plan. This plan is developed to ensure that there is no potential for any reclaim water or nondrinking water wells to connect with the drinking water distribution system." Windshield survey conducted on March 24, 2016. ITEM: The wastewater lift station at Camestown has a new generator and appears consistent (without entry) with the statement by DN Higgins employee that the lift station was rebuilt recently. ITEM: The wastewater lift station at Copeland, near the Lee Cypress Co-op Water Treatment Plant, has a new generator and appears consistent (without entry) with the statement by DN Higgins employee that the lift station was rebuilt recently. ITEM: There is a second wastewater lift station in Copeland and it has a generator. ITEM: It appears that portions of the City of Everglades City are still provided collection service by gravity sewers and lift stations. No lift stations were accessed and no manholes opened as this was a windshield survey only. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with a single pump station serving each single family home in most cases. 14 April 4, 2016 ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a single commercial establishment. It was not obvious whether or not the size of the pumps or wetwell of the pump station for larger commercial establishments was any different from the standard pump station typically used for a single family residence. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a group (number unknown) of RV units or mobile homes. ITEM: It appears that there are numerous grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with one pump station serving a motel or similar business which would likely have a large number of plumbing fixtures. ITEM: It appears that there are a number of grinder pump stations (green access covers) throughout the City of Everglades City with a single pump station serving a multi- family building or group of buildings which may have as many as eight to sixteen (possibly more) residential units which would likely have a large number of plumbing fixtures. ITEM: Visual observation seems to confirm statements made by others that Plantation Island is not served by sanitary sewers of any kind and that this is an area of high population density with high water table being served by septic tank systems. ITEM: Visual observation seems to confirm statements made by others that most of Chokoloskee is not served by sanitary sewers of any kind and that much of this is an area of high population density with high water table being served by septic tank systems. Conclusions: ➢ It appears that some areas may have appropriate level of sanitary sewer collection system, while other areas appear to possibly have sub -standard level of sanitary sewer collection system. Of significant concern, it appears that a single grinder pump station (believed to only have a small wetwell and single pump) may be serving more than the typical single family residence or small cluster of residences more typical of these systems. ➢ Once the number of fixtures being provided service by a single grinder pump station (typical of that used for a single family residence) reaches a certain level, it is suggested that a single pump grinder pump station is no longer sufficient. [The current analysis did not attempt to determine a regulatory limit or recommendation in this regard, although it appears that in many cases this is a concern]. ➢ FDEP has a guidance and standards manual specifically for non-conventional/alternative sewer systems which includes pressure sewers. It is suggested this manual, as well as meeting with FDEP, eventually be used to assess the existing system with regard to reliability and whether or not the City's system meets minimum standards. ➢ No attempt has been made in this very limited assignment to quantify the degree of the problems with the existing system, although it is believed, from review of various 15 April 4, 2016 documents that many of the lift stations throughout the collection system are in need of major repair or replacement. ➢ There are two large areas — Plantation Island and Chokoloskee — where there are no existing sanitary sewer system and where such a system will almost certainly be needed at some point in time. Summary of Need for Significant Upgrades and Expansion Water System — Transmission System Upgrades ➢ The size and capacity, as well as the condition, of the existing transmission pipeline system which interconnects Copeland, City of Everglades City, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee is unknown. In order to meet future demands as well as eventually provide minimum fire flows throughout the system, it is assumed that as much as approximately 60,000 to 70,000 lineal feet of water transmission mains may eventually be needed. This may be replacement of older pipelines or paralleling of existing pipelines. ➢ It is assumed that installation of fire hydrants to meet Collier County development standards will be needed, possibly resulting in larger water main size requirements. ➢ Upgrades to the City of Everglades City water booster pump station are anticipated as eventually being needed. This assumes that the combination of sufficient upgrades to the transmission system and upgrades to this pump station would be sufficient to provide the necessary flow and pressure to Plantation Island and Chokoloskee to serve both potable and fire protection needs. Water System — Distribution System Upgrades ➢ The size and condition of the existing distribution system pipelines is unknown. It is assumed, that at some point, much of the existing system may need to be replaced. This would include fire hydrants, water serve meter assemblies, and back flow prevention devices. Water System — Water Supply Upgrades ➢ Two additional water supply wells will likely eventually be required in order to handle future anticipated needs as well as minimum level of reliability. Water Treatment Plant Upgrades One additional water treatment process train will likely eventually be needed in order to handle future projected needs, while also providing the ability to meet an acceptable percentage of anticipated demand with one process train offline. ➢ Upgrades are anticipated to be required to a variety of other process equipment as well as all electrical systems in order to meet Collier County typical standards. ➢ Computerized control and monitoring system typical of Collier County standards will likely be required. 16 April 4, 2016 Upgrades to pressure sewer system ➢ Installation of additional simplex grinder pump stations (or upgrading to a duplex pump station) is anticipated as being required for areas where it appears that too many residential units are connected to a single grinder pump station. ➢ Addition of telemetry system to each grinder pump station is anticipated in order to send all alarms to a centralized monitoring location. ➢ In order to meet FDEP requirements for pressurized sewer systems, sufficient spare parts (grinder pumps and accessories) will need to be purchased and maintained. FDEP requires a minimum of 3% spare grinder pumps for systems which use simplex pumping units, as well as sufficient maintenance staff to be able to change out a failed grinder pump on short notice. ➢ It is assumed that for those areas of the sanitary sewer system which remain on gravity type sewer system, the sewer lines may eventually require slip -lining, manholes lined, and significant upgrades to the existing conventional lift stations. This may include new pumps, controls, and telemetry systems. Alternatively, the gravity system may eventually be abandoned and new pressure sewer system installed as replacement. ➢ Installation of pressure sewer systems to serve those areas which currently do not have sanitary sewer service. It is assumed that in single family neighborhoods that each grinder pump station would serve a single household or at most two households with the unit placed on the common lot -line. It is assumed that in multi -family neighborhoods that each grinder pump station may be able to serve up to four housing units. [This would need to be verified based on analysis of fixture counts and a County standard regarding use of simplex grinder pump stations and consistent with FDEP rules]. Wastewater Treatment Plant Replacement ➢ The existing wastewater treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life. An entirely new treatment facility is needed. It is assumed that the effluent disposal method will be reuse of reclaimed water on residential lots, as well as along City streets, at the airport, at the School, and at parks. The effluent quality and system reliability will be limiting factors. ➢ Due to the presence of adjacent environmentally sensitive areas, it is suggested that the wastewater treatment facility be designed for some degree of nitrogen removal as well as have the ability to include some degree of phosphorus removal if it is ever required by FDEP. ➢ In order to provide for the highest quality reclaimed water possible, the use of MBR technology to provide assurances of meeting TSS, turbidity, and coliform permit requirements for reuse may be the necessary standard. This type of higher cost system may also be necessary due to site space limitations. ➢ The proposed wastewater treatment facility would need to include sufficient flow equalization in order to minimize facility overload during rainy season events typical of coastal communities. ➢ The proposed wastewater treatment facility would include a minimum one -day volume of flow Reject Storage Tank (consider two-day reject storage tank) plus a minimum of one - day volume of flow Reuse Storage Tank (consider two-day reuse storage tank) in order to operate the facility while providing assurances of always meeting public health standards for water going to the reuse system. 17 April 4, 2016 Reclaimed Water System ➢ The reclaimed water system should include a minimum three-day volume of flow storage pond (consideration should be made for five day storage pond) to allow for storage of reclaimed water produced on rain days and periods of lower rates of residential irrigation on lawns of low lying elevation areas. (The FDEP rules provide for the methodology for assessment of the number of days of storage volume necessary.) ➢ Reclaimed water pump station should be sized to meet projected peak irrigation demands (consideration should be made for the ability of pumping the maximum daily flow over a six to eight hour period of irrigation each night/early morning). ➢ Install new reclaimed water pipelines throughout the entire City of Everglades City. ➢ FDEP is likely to require a deep injection well or other alternative effluent disposal system for back-up of the reuse system. It may be possible to install the reuse system and to demonstrate to FDEP that all of the effluent produced is utilized for irrigation. This demonstration may postpone the need for the deep injection well, although may not totally avoid having to eventually construct a deep injection well. ➢ Possibly expand the coverage area for irrigation using reclaimed water to Plantation Island or Chocoloskee in order to dispose of all reclaimed water produced during wet weather periods. This would likely require installation of an alternative water supply system to meet the dry season demand for irrigation customers. [This would be a system more similar to that of Port of the Islands which is a 100% reuse system.] -Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 18 April 4, 2016 Order of magnitude Estimate of Costs to Upgrade and Expand the existing systems. The existing water system is estimated to supply potable water to approximately eight hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. Based on the assumptions provided herein, it is assumed that approximately five hundred additional residential housing units may be served by this utility through build -out, with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent. The existing sanitary sewer system is estimated to serve approximately five hundred residential housing units plus approximately six hundred RV/Park Model type housing units. It is assumed that the sewer system will be expanded to serve all of Plantation Island and all of Chokoloskee accounting for an additional eight hundred residential housing units on the system through build -out, with an associated growth in commercial customers on the order of 20 to 30 percent. No attempt to estimate the rate of population growth or timing for extending sanitary sewer service to existing areas is included in this analysis. The following is an order of magnitude estimate of costs which may be reasonably anticipated in the event that the City of Everglades City system was to be expanded and upgraded as identified herein. Based on the limited review and analysis which was the scope of this work assignment, the following breakdown of potential future expenditures is provided below. The higher end of the range for each major system component assumes both build -out of the system to serve the number of customers identified above as well providing a system meeting standards typical of those for the Collier County Public Utilities system. ➢ Water Supply $ 0.5 million ➢ Water Treatment $ 1 million ➢ Water Transmission $ 2 million ➢ Water Distribution $ 3 million ➢ Wastewater Collection $ 6 million ➢ Wastewater Transmission $ 3 million ➢ Wastewater Treatment $10 $ million ➢ Wastewater Reuse $ 1.5 million ➢ Wastewater Disposal $ 1 million ➢ Telemetry and Control $ 2 million to $ 1 million Note 1 to $ 2.5 million Note 2 to $ 5 million Note 3 to $ 8 million Note 4 to $ 9 million Note 5 to $ 5 million Note 6 to $12 million Note 7 to $ 2.5 million Note 8 to $ 6 million Note 9 to $ 4 million Note 10 Range of Total Potential Cost $30 million to $55 million NOTES: 1. This assumes two new wells are installed and upgrades to the existing wells. 2. This assumes installation of one additional water treatment train along with upgrades to the remainder of components of the existing system, including possible expansion of the building and electrical systems. 3. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement or paralleling of the pipelines forming the "back- bone" system connecting the four communities anywhere from approximately one-third of the length to the entire length of the existing system. [Order of magnitude estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs.] 4. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement of much of the existing potable water system plus the extension of service to new customers. [Order of magnitude estimate of $6,500 per residential housing unit which is typical of costs experienced by Collier County in water system upgrades for Isle of Capri, Riverwood Estates Mobile Home, Naples Mobile Home Park, and Naples Park (including anticipated price escalation to current project costs).] Range in cost provides for predominately new customers up to projects including new customers plus major system upgrade project.] 19 April 4, 2016 5. This assumes extension of sanitary sewer service to all water customers at an order of magnitude cost of $6,500 per residential housing unit using a pressurized sewer system, plus possible need to upgrade much of the old systems (both gravity and pressurized) using a pressurized sewer system with one simplex grinder pump station per house or a limited number of equivalent residential connections per simplex grinder pump station. 6. This assumes the possibility of eventual replacement or paralleling of the pipelines forming the "back- bone" system connecting the three communities currently on the sewer system plus extending service to Plantation Island. [Order of magnitude estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs, plus the cost to upgrade existing lift stations to Collier County standards plus construction of two additional lift stations for service to new customers.] 7. This assumes that a totally new wastewater treatment plant is needed and that it will need to produce high quality reclaimed water suitable for residential irrigation as well as have low nutrient levels to minimize concerns for irrigation runoff and water percolating into the groundwater from impacting the sensitive environment surrounding the developed areas. 8. This includes extension of irrigation pipelines through the City of Everglades City, including a lined storage pond for wet weather storage. [Order of magnitude cost estimate of $50 per foot to cover all potential related project costs, plus cost to construct storage and pumping systems.] 9. This line item includes either any unforeseen systems which may be required by FDEP to assure compliance with regulatory requirements associated with effluent disposal not covered in another line item. It is possible that FDEP may require an alternative effluent disposal system such as a deep injection well. 10. The Collier County Public Utilities system incorporates a telemetry system for monitoring and control of their systems in order to provide operation of their systems. [Estimated at between $1,000 and $2,000 per customer.] -Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 20 April 4, 2016 Some Considerations regarding 100 percent use of Reclaimed Water The Port of the Islands Community Improvement District is located approximately ten miles west of Carnestown. Geographically, this community is similar to that of Everglades City as an isolated area of development totally surrounded by natural wetlands and water. The Port of the Islands Community uses a 100% reclaimed water system (wastewater effluent and water treatment plant concentrate) for irrigation which is supplemented using raw well water. Since implementation of this system, there has never been a need to store excess reclaimed water or use an alternate means of disposal. The following observations from Port of the Islands will assist in comparing to the City of Everglades City potential effluent disposal situation. ➢ Irrigation is provided to approximately 120 developable acres of which approximately 80% currently developed. The remaining approximately 20% is currently vacant lots. Therefore, it can be estimated that approximately 96 gross acres are likely being irrigated at this time. ➢ Irrigation rates fluctuate between dry season (April) and wet season (September). Over the past few years approximately 5 million gallons of irrigation water was used during the low flow irrigation month and approximately 8 million gallons/month of irrigation water was used during a high flow irrigation month. ➢ The approximate gross irrigation factor is approximately 1,700 gallons per gross acre per day [5 million gallons/month over 96 gross acres divided by 30 days/month]. ➢ Assuming approximately one-third of gross area is irrigated, yields an approximate net irrigation factor (application rate) of approximately 5,000 gallons per net acre per day. ➢ Converting to an approximate application rate [43,560 sq. ft./acre, 7.48 gallons/cu. ft., 7 days per week, 12 inches per foot] yields approximately 1.3 inches per week for the summer wet season months. ➢ It is suggested that due to differences in development density that an approximate gross irrigation factor of approximately 1,200 gallons per gross acre per day could be used in order to estimate potential demand for reclaimed water for a residential irrigation system for the City of Everglades City. [This certainly needs to be investigated further, although should represent an order of magnitude estimate based on a similar system. The following is an estimate of potential disposal capacity using irrigation of essentially the entire city limits within the City of Everglades City. ➢ It is estimated that there are likely on the order of between 300 and 350 gross acres which may be suitable for irrigation within the City of Everglades City as development continues on currently vacant land in the City. ➢ Assuming 1,200 gallons per gross acre per day, results in potential capacity for disposal of between 360,000 and 420,000 gallons per day of reclaimed water (during summer months). This is approximately the amount of wastewater effluent (including water treatment plant concentrate) which may be expected to be generated during the off-peak season for the projected 2030 population. ➢ Since the peak tourist season corresponds with the dry season, the higher production of reclaimed water from treatment of wastewater, combined with the higher production of water treatment plant concentrate, would generally be offset with higher irrigation applications rates typical during dry season compared to wet season. 21 April 4, 2016 ➢ A significant difference between the Port of the Islands system and that contemplated for the City of Everglades City system is Port of the Islands residents produce all of the reclaimed water which is available for irrigation on their own lawns and along roadsides. The system being considered here for the City of Everglades City would consist of reclaimed water produced by a population on the order of three times larger than the community over which the reclaimed water would be irrigated. This assumes that all of Copeland, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee would eventually be sewered, and irrigation using reclaimed water would only occur on property in the City of Everglades City. Therefore, we should not carry the analogy between Port of the Islands and the City of Everglades City too far at this level of analysis. ➢ In the event that the reclaimed water irrigation system was to potentially be extended to Plantation Island and/or Chokoloskee, there would likely need to be a supplemental water source developed in order to meet customer demands during the, dry season. The cost of such a supplemental water system, combined with cost of extending the reuse system to more customers, may potentially offset the need for a deep injection well. ➢ For the City of Everglades City system, it is likely a significant size wet -weather reclaimed water storage pond maybe needed and may also potentially offset the need for (or defer) a deep injection well. Such a storage pond would likely only be needed during the high rainfall period each year and would likely be totally dry the remainder of the year. Remainder of page intentionally left blank - 22 April 4, 2016 Sample Collier County water distribution system replacement projects costs Isle of Capri Phase I and Phase 11 Cost — Phase I $1,424,000 (2010 adjusted price) $1,800,000 (estimated 2016 price) Cost— Phase II $1,784,000 (2010 adjusted price) $2,200,000 (estimated 2016 price) Combined Cost $4,000,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 550 Approximate Cost per housing unit $7,000 to $7,500 each Riverwood Estates [Mobile Home] Cost $1,467,000 (2011 adjusted price) $1,800,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 290 Approximate Cost per housing unit $6,000 to $6,500 each Naples Mobile Home Park Cost $ 916,000 (2012 adjusted price) $1,100,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 178 Approximate Cost per housing unit $6,000 to $6,500 each Naples Park Cost $2,084,000 (2013 adjusted price) $2,400,000 (estimated 2016 price) Total approximate number of housing units 320 Approximate Cost per housing unit $7,500 each 23 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -J FLORIDA DEP EVERGLADES CITY MASTER SYSTEM NOTICE OF PERMIT, JANUARY 31, 2013 8 Pages January 31, 2013 In the matter of an Application for Permit by: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City 102 Copeland and Broadway Everglades, Fl. 34139 dsmallwood@.cityofeverp,lades.org South District Office P.O. Box 2549 Fort Myers, FL 33902-2549 R)CK SCOTT GOVERNOR JENNIFER CARROLL LT. GOVERNOR, HERSCHEL T.IIVINYARD JR, SECRETARY DEP File No. 5110089 Collier County City of Everglades City Water System Upgrade NOTICE OF PERMIT Enclosed is Permit Number 315455 -001 -WC to upgrade the existing water treatment plant. A new facility with enhanced treatment is needed because of poor well water quality and poor finished water quality. This project will add new treatment facilities including new Nanofiltration (NF) process trains, control system, chemical feed systems and interconnecting piping to the two new raw water wells. The maximum day operation capacity of the NF plant is 465,000 gpd. The new NF system will serve the residents of Everglades City, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee, issued pursuant to Section 403.861(9), Florida Statutes. Any party to this Order (permit) has the right to seek judicial review of the permit pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by the filing of a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, Mail Station 35,3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeals. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days after the date this Notice is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Page 1 of 8 Executed in Fort Myers, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - *-- jlr-� Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management 2295 Victoria Avenue, Suite 364 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Phone Number (239) 344-5600 Enclosure: Permit CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE The undersigned duly designated deputy agency clerk hereby certifies that this Notice of Permit and all copies were mailed/electronically transmitted before the close of business on January 31, 2013 to those persons listed. FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Filed, on this date, under section 120.52(7), Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. 9.1` `'' M�:liwe January 31, 2013 Clerk Date Copies Furnished to: A. Rony Joel, P.E. 2ronyioel@comeast,net Page 2 of 8 Jon M. Iglehart, Director South District Office PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City 102 Copeland and Broadway Everglades, Fl. 34139 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION South District Office P.O. Box 2549 Port Myers, FL 33902-2549 RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR JENNIFER CARROLL LT. GOVERNOR HERSCHEL T. VINYARD JR. SECRETARY I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue: January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 County: Collier Latitude: 25° 5725" N Longitude: 819 21'45" W Section/Town/Range: 12/52S/29E Project: City of Everglades City Water System Upgrade Southwest Coast EMA This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rules 62-4, 62-550, 62-555, and 62-699. The above named permittee is hereby authorized to perform the work or operate the facility shown on the application and approved drawing(s), plans, and other documents, attached hereto or on file with the Department and made a part hereof and specifically described as follows: Upgrade to the existing water treatment plant. A new facility with enhanced treatment is needed because of poor well water quality and poor finished water quality. This project will add new treatment facilities including new Nanofiltration (NF) process trains, control system, chemical feed systems and interconnecting piping to the two new raw water wells. The maximum day operation capacity of the NF plant is 465,000 gpd and consists of the following: 1) Install a Sulfuric Acid feed system 350 gallon Tote with pump rated at 1.0 gph and one pump on standby; 2) Install a Scale Inhibitor feed system 55 gallons drum with pump rated at 0.10 gph and one pump on standby; 3) Install two Cartridge Filters with a capacity of 195 gpm each; 4) Install of two membrane feed pumps with a capacity of 195 gpm each; 5) Installation of dual Nanofiltration (NF) system with a capacity of 175 gpm/250,000 gpd each for a total capacity of 350 gpm or NF membrane of 500.000 gpd; 6) Install a Hypochlorite Feed System 350 gallon Tote with a pump capacity of 1.07 gph and one pump on standby; 7) Install an Ammonium Sulfate Feed System 55 gallon drum with pump rated at 0.15 gph and one pump on standby; 8) Install a Sodium Hydroxide feed system 350 gallons Tote with pump rated at 1.04 gph and one pump on standby; Page 3 of 8 PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue; January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 9) Installation of a Concentrate Equalization Tank 15,000 gallons with pump rated at 100 gpm and air gap between the tank and the Camestown Lift Station. The existing aerator with storage tank (500,000 gallons) and dual high service pumps with a capacity of 350 gpm each will be part of the new facility as depicted on AEC Water of Marco Island, Inc., design drawings sheet number Cover, and G-1, dated November 19, and December 18, 2012. The design drawings were submitted in support of the construction application. The application was dated on December 5, 2012, revised and received December 18, 2012, along with related documents and Technical Specifications dated December 18, 2012 and received the same date. The proposed project is located at the existing City of Everglades WTP located at 15414 Janes Scenic Drive, in Copeland Collier County. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. The terms, conditions, requirements, limitations, and restrictions set forth in this permit are "permit conditions" and are binding and enforceable pursuant to Sections 403.141, 403.727, or 403.859 through 403.861, F.S. The permittee is placed on notice that the Department will review this permit periodically and may initiate enforcement action for any violation of these conditions. 2. This permit is valid only for the specific processes and operations applied for and indicated in the approved drawings or exhibits. Any unauthorized deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications, or conditions of this permit may constitute grounds for revocation and enforcement action by the Department. 3. As provided in Subsections 403.087(6) and 403.722(5) F.S., the issuance of this permit does not convey any vested rights or any exclusive privileges. Neither does it authorize any injury to public or private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. This permit is not a waiver of or approval of any other Department permit that may be required for other aspects of the total project which are not addressed in the permit. 4. This permit conveys no title to land or water, does not constitute State recognition or acknowledgment of title, and does not constitute authority for the use of submerged lands unless herein provided and the necessary title or leasehold interests have been obtained from the State. Only the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund may express State opinion as to title. 5. This permit does not relieve the permittee from liability for harm or injury to human health or welfare, animal, or plant life, or property caused by the construction or operation of this permitted source, or from penalties therefore; nor does it allow the permittee to cause pollution in contravention of Florida Statutes and Department rules, unless specifically authorized by any order from the Department. 6. The permittee shall properly operate and maintain the facility and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed and used by the permittee to achieve Page 4 of 8 PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City GENERAL CONDITIONS: I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue: January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 compliance with the conditions of this permit, as required by Department rules. This provision includes the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit and when required by Department rules. 7. The permittee, by accepting this permit, specifically agrees to allow authorized Department personnel, upon presentation of credential or other documents as may be required by law, and at reasonable times, access to the premises where the permitted activity is located or conducted to: a) Have access to and copy any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; b) Inspect the facility, equipment, practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and c) Sample or monitor any substances or parameters at any location reasonably necessary to assure compliance with this permit or Department rules. Reasonable time may depend on the nature of the concern being investigated. 8. If, for any reason, the permittee does not comply with or will be unable to comply with any condition or limitation specified in this permit, the permittee shall immediately provide the Department with the following information: a) A description of and cause of non-compliance; and b) The period of non-compliance, including dates and times; or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the non-compliance is expected to continue, and steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the non-compliance. The permittee shall be responsible for any and all damages which may result and may be subject to enforcement action by the Department for penalties or revocation of this permit. 9. In accepting this permit, the permittee understands and agrees that all records, notes, monitoring data and other information relating to the construction or operation of this permitted source, which are submitted to the Department, may be used by the Department as evidence in any enforcement case involving the permitted source arising under the Florida Statutes or Department rules, except where such use is prescribed by Section 403.111 and 403.73, F.S. Such evidence shall only be used to the extent it is consistent with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and appropriate evidentiary rules. 10. The permittee agrees to comply with changes in Department rules and Florida Statutes after a reasonable time for compliance, provided however, the permittee does not waive any other rights granted by Florida Statutes or Department rules. A reasonable time for compliance with a new or amended surface water quality standard, other than those standards addressed in Rule 62- 302.500, shall include a reasonable time to obtain or be denied a mixing zone for the new or amended standard. 11. This permit is transferable only upon Department approval in accordance with F.A.C. Rules 62-4.120 and 62-730.300, F.A.C. as applicable. The permittee shall be liable for any non- compliance of the permitted activity until the transfer is approved by the Department. Page 5 of 8 PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City GENERAL CONDITIONS: I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue: January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 12. This permit or a copy thereof shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. 13. This permit also constitutes: (a) Determination of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) (b) Determination of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) (c) Certification of compliance with State Water Quality Standards (Section 401, PL 92-500) (d) Compliance with New Source Performance Standards 14. The permittee shall comply with the following: a) Upon request, the permittee shall furnish all records and plans required under Department rules. During enforcement actions, the retention period for all records will be extended automatically, unless otherwise stipulated by the Department. b) The permittee shall hold at the facility or other location designated by this permit records of all monitoring information (including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation), required by the permit, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for c) this permit. These materials shall be retained at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application unless otherwise specified by Department rule. d) Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. the date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. the person responsible for performing the sampling or measurements; 3. the dates analyses were performed; 4. the person responsible for performing the analyses; 5. the analytical techniques or methods used; 6. the results of such analyses. 15. When requested by the Department, the permittee shall within a reasonable time furnish any information required by law which is needed to determine compliance with the permit. If the permittee becomes aware the relevant facts were not submitted or were incorrect in the permit application or in any report to the Department, such facts or information shall be corrected promptly. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Drawings, plans, documents or specifications submitted by the Permittee, not attached hereto, but retained on file at the South Florida District Office, are made a part hereof. Page 6 of 8 PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue: January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 2. The applicant shall retain the engineer of record or obtain the services of any professional engineer registered in the State of Florida for the inspection of the construction of this project. Upon completion the engineer shall inspect for conformity to construction permit applications and associated documents. 3. A Request for Letter of Release to Place Water Supply System Into Service, form 62- 555.900(9), along with record drawings and bacteriological analysis results shall be submitted within 60 days after completion of construction of the project and Department approval obtained prior to placement in operation. 4. Pipe, fittings, valves, fire hydrants and other materials shall conform to the most recent standards issued by the American Water Works Association (AWWA). 5. Water supply facilities including mains shall be installed, cleaned, disinfected and bacteriologically cleared for service, in accordance with the latest applicable AW WA Standards and Department rules and regulations. 6. The facility is a category II, staffing by Class C or higher operator, 3 hours per day for 5 days per week and one visit on each weekend day. F.A.C. Rules 62-699.310(2)(e)2. An operator meeting the lead operator classification level of the plant shall be available during all periods of plant operation. "Available" means able to be contacted as needed to initiate the appropriate action in a timely manner. F.A.C. Rule 62-699.311(1). 7. The water treatment plant shall maintain throughout the distribution system a minimum combined chlorine residual of 0.6 mg/I or its equivalent. A minimum system pressure of 20 psi must be maintained throughout the system. Also, safety equipment shall be provided and located outside of chlorine room. 8. The permittee shall submit a monthly operations report (MOR) DEP Form 62-555.900(2), to the Department no later than the tenth of each succeeding month. 9. This permit is valid only in conjunction with a wastewater permit issued by the Department. Issuance of this permit does not.imply that a wastewater permit will be issued. The applicant shall obtain all other required permits for this project. 10. This facility is a Community Water System as defined in F.A.C. Rule 62-550.200(16) and shall comply with the applicable chemical and bacteriological monitoring requirements of F.A.C. Rule 62-550. Such requirements shall be initiated within the quarter that the water treatment facility is placed into service (i.e. January—March or April—June, the preceding are an examples of quarters) and the results submitted to the Department. Page 7 of 8 PERMITTEE: Sammy Hamilton, Jr., Mayor City of Everglades City SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: I.D. No: 5110089 Permit/Cert. No.: 315455 -001 -WC Date of Issue: January 30, 2013 Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 11. The permittee or suppliers of water shall telephone the State Warning Point (SWP), at 1-800- 320-0519 immediately (i.e. within two hours) after discovery of any actual or suspected sabotage or security breach, or any suspicious incident, involving a public water system in accordance with the F.A.C. Rule 62-555.350(10). 12. The permittee is reminded of the necessity to comply with the pertinent regulations of any other regulatory agency, as well as any county, municipal, and federal regulations applicable to the project. These regulations may include, but are not limited to, those of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in implementing flood control measures. This permit should not be construed to imply compliance with the rules and regulations of other regulatory agencies. Note: In the event of an emergency the permittee shall contact the Department by calling (850) 413-9911. During normal business hours, the permittee shall call (239) 344-5600. JMI/BTS/isc Issued this 30th day of January, 2013 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - 01 Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management Page 8 of 8 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -K TETRA TECH, EVERGLADES CITY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FEBRUARY 25, 2011 8 Pages L M r �.a LM i i CcND E C2 in L M r �.a LM CcND E C2 in L M .°; 0 r LM CcND E C2 in .°; 0 0 C6 U � �Co V .µ i t � x _ AP CL E Lm p D ca u LL rL v m ,� � ED RS s., i W Ll t/1 p '� a �W p Q m _ p -a0cn E O CLE E O am 0 Qlk wh (1) rm 0 CL CWL m rbi LM m I mme Qlk wh (1) rm 0 CL CWL m rbi LM m I NEW W r E L � � O � L E 3 0 � o 3 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -L BIG CYPRESS BASIN, EVERGLADES CITY, WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MEMORANDUM DATED FEBRUARY 25, 2011 1 Page MEMORANDUM TO: Big Cypress Basin Board Members FROM: Clarence S. Tears, Jr., Director, Big Cypress Basin DATE: February 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Project Update: City of Everglades City Water Management System Master Plan Implementation; Water Treatment Improvements Program (Jennifer L. Woodall, P.E., Vice President, Tetra Tech, Engineering and Architectural Services) Background: The City of Everglades City has experienced occasional detections of possible surface water influences on public water supply wells at its well field near Copeland. A possible source of the surface water contamination is the nearby flooded limestone quarry, which may have been excavated to the depth of the producing zone of the City's well Feld. Due to the historical bacteriological contamination issues at this well field, the construction of production wells into a deeper portion of the aquifer, not suspected to be under the influence of surface water, is desired. This project initiates the implementation of the proposed alternatives and recommendations of the Master Plan completed in FY10. The purpose of this project is to investigate the replacement of two existing potable water supply wells with new wells constructed into the deeper Gray Limestone aquifer. This phase of the project includes the design, construction and testing of an exploratory well. Also during this phase funding assistant from agencies offering qualifying grant programs will be requested. At this time it is expected that the agencies will be the FDEP and the USDA/Rural Development. How this helps meet the Big Cypress Basin's 5 -year Strategic Plan: The project has been formulated to conform to the Big Cypress Basins 5 -Year Strategic Plan by meeting the District's mission of water resources including water supply and water conservation. Funding Source: The BCB Board FY11 Budget has $300,000 earmarked for this project. This Board item impacts what areas of the Basin, both resource areas and geography: The project will benefit the water management systems in Everglades City which is geographically located in the Big Cypress Basin Watershed. What concerns could this Board item raise? The Board may be concerned about the City's ability to implement the master plan. Several funding sources and programs for rural communities were identified in the Master Plan to highlight funding availability and eligibility requirements. The Big Cypress Basin staff is confident that the City of Everglades City is eligible for such programs. Whyshould the Big Cypress Basin Board approve this item? N/A If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Clarence Tears at ext. 7601. CT/kt PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -M TETRA TECH, EVERGLADES CITY WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 42 Pages 3 TffIN 1MMUMIN sE CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. Description No. Table of Contents -i- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Project Goal 1-4 1.3 Project Priorities 1-4 2.0 DEMAND PROJECTIONS 2.1 Service Area Description 2-1 2.2 Population Projections 2-1 2.3 Water and Wastewater Demands 2-5 3.0 WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 3.1 General 3-1 3.2 Water Supply Wells 3-1 3.3 Water Treatment Plant 3-6 3.4 Water Booster Station 3-7 4.0 WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 4.1 General 4-1 4.2 Collection System 4-1 4.3 Wastewater Treatment Plant 4-1 4.4 Surface Water Discharge 4-5 4.5 Reclaimed Water System 4-5 5.0 STORMWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 5.1 General 5-1 5.2 Existing Flooding Issues 5-1 5.3 Flood Plain Map 5-1 5.4 Available Water Quality Information 5-6 5.5 Recommendations for Future Analysis 5-6 6.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 Drinking Water Quality Requirements 6-1 6.2.1 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1986 6-1 6.2.2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 6-4 6.2.3 Disinfection/Disinfection By -Product Rule 6-5 Existing and Future 6.2.4 Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Existing and Future 6-8 6.2.5 Groundwater Rule 6-9 TETRATrC" J JLW/sma/masterplan/TOC Tt 0200-04546-10003 -i- 093010 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Page No. 6.2.6 Sulfate Rule 6-10 6.2.7 Radon and Radionuclides 6-10 6.2.8 Arsenic 6-11 6.2.9 Emergent Pollutants of Concern 6-11 6.3 Surface Water Quality 6-12 7.0 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 7.1 General 7-1 7.2 Drinking Water Treatment Alternatives 7-1 7.2.1 Alternative 1: New Fresh Water Supply Wells with 7-1 Existing Treatment 7.2.2 Alternative 2: Existing Water Supply with 7-2 Additional Treatment 7.2.3 Alternative 3: New Brackish Water Supply Wells with 7-3 Membrane Treatment 7.3 Drinking Water Treatment Operation and Maintenance Costs 7-4 7.4 Drinking Water Treatment Recommendations 7-4 7.5 Wastewater Treatment Alternatives 7-5 7.5.1 Alternative 1: Conventional BNR Package Plant 7-6 7.5.2 Alternative 2: Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) 7-8 7.5.3 Alternativ3 3: Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) 7-9 7.6 Wastewater Treatment Operation and Maintenance Costs 7-10 7.7 Wastewater Treatment Recommendations 7-10 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 8.1 General 8-1 8.2 Recommended Capital Improvements Program 8-1 8.2.1 Drinking Water System 8-1 8.2.2 Wastewater System 8-5 9.0 FUNDING SOURCES 9.1 Existing Rates and Charges 9-1 9-2 Funding Sources 9-2 9-3 South Florida Water Management District 9-3 9.3.1 Alternative Water Supply Funding 9-3 9.3.2 Other SFWMD Funding 9-3 9.4 Florida Department of Environmental Protection 9-3 9.4.1 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program 9-3 9.4.2 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program 9-5 9.4.3 Small Community Wastewater Facilities Grants Program 9-5 9.4.4 State Bond Loan Program 9-5 9.5 Community Development Block Grants 9-5 i'Ct13ATf:�;Fi JLW/sma/masterplan/TOC Tt #P200-04546-10003 -ii- 093010 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Description 9.6 US Department of Agriculture Office of Rural Development 9.6.1 Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants 9.6.2 Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants 9.7 Florida Rural Water Association 9.8 Bond Pools APPENDICES Page No. 9-6 9-6 9-6 9-7 9-7 Appendix A: Everglades City Water System Master Plan and Preliminary Data and Information Summary Appendix B: Existing Water Quality Rates Appendix C: Consumptive Use Permit RAI and Application Appendix D: Existing Drinking Water Quality Standards Appendix E: Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations Permit Appendix F: Everglades City Water Conservation Ordinance and Rule and Charge Ordinance Appendix G: Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Appendix H: Hydrogeology of the Gray Limestone Aquifer INTCTtATr C, JL W/sma/masterplan/TOC Tt 4P200-04546-10003 iii- 093010 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL Everglades City is a small municipality in the southernmost portion of Collier County as illustrated in Figure 1-1. The City is the interface to Big Cypress Swamp with the coastal wetlands lining the north coast of Chokoloskee Bay. This highly sensitive estuarine shallow water region is part of the "Ten Thousand Islands" area that is known to be a vital part of the ecology of Southern Everglades National Park as it is home to many species of birds, fish and other wildlife. The outer portions of the City are characterized by mangrove wetlands. The center of the City was artificially elevated in the 1920s through dredge and fill operations of the Collier County Company. The scope of work for this project is to prepare a water management system master plan for a 20 - year planning period for the water, wastewater and storm water systems for the City of Everglades City. Everglades City provides water and / or wastewater service to portions of the surrounding areas of Copeland, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee. An aerial of the region including these surrounding areas is shown in Figure 1-2. The City's storm water infrastructure is limited to the City limits. Existing water supply needs within the City's water service area are met with the surficial aquifer, and the water system is not able to meet current drinking water regulations for disinfection and disinfection by products. Alternative water supply use is limited to reclaimed water, which is utilized throughout the City for irrigation of medians and residential lawns. The City's low pressure wastewater collection system is in good condition and has reduced or eliminated infiltration into the collection system, but the existing wastewater treatment facility is in need of extensive repairs. Necessary capital improvements to repair or replace existing water and wastewater facilities will be identified in this master plan. Drainage within the developed areas of the City is inhibited by limited natural relief to convey storm water, extremely high ground water and significant tailwater from both tidal events and periodic storm surge. Specific improvements to repair or replace existing storm water infrastructure should be identified through a separate storm water master plan. The scope of work relative to storm water for this master plan is to generally characterize the drainage issues and outline recommendations for a storm water master planning effort. JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 1 Tt#P200-04546-10003 1-1 093010 6 6 NF 6 f f F N T N Z wa �a ¢a �p s W PROJECT GOAL The main goal of this master plan is to identify capital improvements necessary for the water and wastewater systems through 2030, and to identify a scope of work and costs associated with a separate storm water master planning effort. 1.2 PROJECT PRIORITIES Priorities for this project include: 1. Public Health and Safety. The highest priority for any master plan is to ensure that public health and safety is maintained. This includes compliance with current and future drinking water regulations, compliance with reclaimed water regulations and maintaining a reasonable level of service for flood abatement. 2. Customer Expectations. The existing drinking water supply does not meet customer expectations for color. The proposed drinking water improvement options identified in this master plan will include options that address regulatory compliance as well as customer expectations in terms of color. 3. Compliance with Regulatory Agency Goals. Compatibility with regulatory agency goals is essential to a successful master plan. This master plan will focus on improvements necessary to bring the City's facilities into and maintain compliance with regulatory guidelines 4. Enhancement of Chokoloskee Bay and Barron River. Recommendations for a future storm water master plan that addresses best management practices to protect water quality are included in this master plan. 5. Protection of Other Natural Resources. The natural areas adjacent to or in the vicinity of the City include Everglades National Park, Big Cypress National Park and Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park. Protection of wetlands, groundwater and other natural resources within these areas is a priority. This master plan will focus on sustainable water supply projects and water quality management practices that protect natural resources to the maximum extent possible. NiTORATECH JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 1 Tt #P200-04546-10003 1-4 093010 SECTION 2 DEMAND PROJECTIONS 2.1 SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION Tetra Tech used both land use and parcel count to determine and confirm the previously established population and flow projections for the Everglades City service area. Although the City does not currently serve all areas of Plantation Island, Copeland and Chokoloskee Island, all of these areas were included in the demand projections for planning purposes. The USGS map illustrating these areas can be found in Figure 2-1. 2.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS Population estimates for the service area as established by Collier County, the City's Planning and Zoning reports as well as the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan are provided in Table 2-1 below. Table 2-1 Available Population Data Year Collier County'; Po ulation Estimate City Planning and Zoning; Report Po elation Data Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan 2005 1,436 1,367 1,367 2010 1,523 1,561 1,561 2015 1,616 1,767 1,767 2020 1,715 1,987 1,987 2025 1,819 2,219 2,219 2030 1,929 A detailed land use and parcel analysis was completed to verify the existing and build out populations of the Everglades City service area. Figure 2-2 illustrates the land use and parcel data utilized for this analysis. The total number of existing single family homes, undeveloped lots and mobile homes were estimated via visual observation using aerial maps. The estimated counts for developed, undeveloped and trailers, for each section in the service area are illustrated in Table 2-2. �. V1?k;Ti3n.TG�6i JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-1 051910 p -ws„x�a 3 e :9 x �Yr°' v�. 1� fi a(r r. ! 4�r t ��y C r ,t "es �` ?t n� •! Sw A p x � �' •g;'{�Z{ x i4{yIA "'e' AMR �'a '�` < �•`° 41�a � t �`' � 1 z sr t' �F� ,y s �' i° s.y F I � _ _wR'_ ��ai� y. Yom' "�' - zN'J�= a SMOV !TIA 13 «.b m' - ��� cw Biu y� cls 's am I ME PAY 4 1 �- ce S� „t 10 a >��°i£? �?✓"° ; a "�''*y a,, is �K �5 / /dr{�daxay'.: �F�§ � F94y Flo, � ( f�4 f • t z..a ` 9 � 5 t � � � ��� you S d c .kid` r��,�f`�y, a�� 5 op pp, Table 2-2 Land Use Data Area Existing . , Single Family Homes Existing ', Mobile Homes Undeveloped (Empty Lots(Vacant Est. Lots for Undeveloped Land Build Out Housing, , Units Chokoloskee 170 300 70 2030 540 Everglades City 250 130 130 352 862 Copeland 85 50 632 767 Plantation 140 156 296 TOTAL 645 430 406 984 2,465 Based on the total existing housing units from the table above, the current population for the service area is estimated at 2,236 people (1,075 housing units X 2.08 persons/housing units), assuming 100% occupancy of housing units. In the 2000 Census the unoccupied housing units accounted for 33% of the total homes. Applying the same percent of unoccupied homes to the total population, the existing population is reduced to 1,475 persons. To determine the ultimate population or build out condition for the Everglades City Service area, all the undeveloped lots are assumed to have a single family residence demand with an overall occupancy of 100%. Incorporating these assumption yields an estimated build out of 2,465 housing units with an ultimate population of 5,127 persons. There are large areas surrounding the City which are classified as mangrove swamp in the SFWMD land use map, and these areas were not included in the build -out population estimate Table 2-3 presents the anticipated population growth based on a growth rate of 2.5%. Table 2-3 Estimated Service Area Permanent Population by Year Year Anticipated Service Area Permanent Population 2010 1,475 2015 1,669 2020 1,888 2025 2,136 2030 2,417 * tLT Rf, I FC11 JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-4 051910 A seasonal population of 20% of the total estimated 2030 population was added for a total population estimate of 2,900. The seasonal population estimate was selected to be consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. Table 2-4 Estimated Service Area Permanent Population Plus Seasonal Population by Year Year. Anticipated Service Area Permanent Po ulatioa Anticipated Service Area, Permanent Plus Seasonal Population 2010 1,475 1,770 2015 1,669 2,003 2020 1,888 2,266 2025 1 2,136 1 2,563 2030 1 2,417 1 2,900 2.3 WATER AND WASTEWATER DEMAND To determine existing and ultimate treatment demands for the service area, typical single family residence demands of 350 and 300 gallons per day (gpd) per residential lot were assumed for water and wastewater treatment demands. Table 2-5 summarizes the water and wastewater treatment demand for service area for the 20 year planning period. Table 2-5 Projected Water and Wastewater Demand Area Projected Water Demand ' d Projected Wastewater Flow d -Everglades City Service Area 487,980 418,269 For planning purposes, a capacity of 0.5 MGD was utilized for both the water and wastewater facilities. fir.. � riaz,rr�ri JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 2 Tt#P200-04546-10003 2-5 051910 SECTION 3 WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 3.1 GENERAL The Everglades City water system currently provides service to Everglades City, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island and parts of Copeland. The existing system consists of a water treatment plant located in Copeland that includes three water supply wells, a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, aeration, and chloramination. The existing water treatment facility is rated for a maximum daily demand of 0.504 MGD. An aerial of the existing treatment plant site is illustrated in Figure 3-1. The system is not in compliance with existing disinfection and disinfection by product regulations. From the main water treatment plant, water is pumped approximately 7 -miles through an existing 8 -inch PVC water main to Everglades City. The City has a water booster station located in Everglades City that includes a 500,000 gallon ground storage tank, chloramination and high service pumps. Tetra Tech inspected the above ground water facilities on April 6, 2010. During the site inspection, City staff provided information on existing and past problems with the water facilities. The information obtained during the site inspection and from the regulatory files is summarized below. Photographs from the site visit can be found in Figures 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4. A general discussion of system deficiencies is found at the end of this section, and specific capital improvement options can be found in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. 3.2 WATER SUPPLY WELLS The City has three water supply wells, each cased to a depth of 15 feet. Each well has a supply capacity of 220 gallons per minute (gpm). Table 3-1 includes a description of each of the existing water supply wells. Table 3-1 Existing Water Supply Wells Well Name FDEP ID Total Depth Casing Depth > Pump Capacity Aquifer West Well AAA9923 25 15 220 gpm Surficial Center Well AAA9922 25 15 220 gpm Surficial East well AAA9921 25 15 220 gpm Surficial The reliable wellfield capacity with one well out of service is 0.633 million gallons per day (MGD). However, at the time of the site inspection, only one well was in operation due to Nil I!'f91A;?ECII JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-1 093010 Everglades City TETRATECH F* I Water Management System Master Plan Figure Existing Wells 1 3-2 Everglades City ' T Figure Water Management System Master Plan Existing Treatment Site 1-3 Everglades City Water Management System Master Plan Figure Existing Booster Station 1 3-4 microbial contamination issues with the other two wells. In discussions with City staff, microbial contamination is a frequent occurrence especially at the start of the rainy season. A review of the FDEP file indicates that the City has been notified that the Center well is microbially contaminated by the presence of Total Coliform and E. Coli Bacteria. Based on this contamination, the City must either: 1. Prove that the well is not microbially contaminated by the submission of 20 new well samples, 2. Provide treatment to achieve 4 log virus removal / inactivation, or 3. Replace the contaminated well. Based on a review of the file and discussions at the site, microbial contamination of the wells is a persistent problem. In addition to the microbial contamination issues, it was also noted during the site inspection that there is a persistent problem with iron bacteria in the existing wells. It is recommended that the City install additional treatment facilities to achieve 4 -log virus removal inactivation without exceeding disinfection by product regulations and replace the existing wells. 3.3 WATER TREATMENT PLANT The existing water treatment plant is located in Copeland and the general components are summarized in Table 3-2 below. Table 3-2 Existing Water Treatment Plant Equipment No. Component --Capacity/Volume I Pre -Cast Ground Storage Tank 500,000 gallons 2 Sodium Hypochlorite System Storage 800 gallons 3 Sodium Hypochlorite Feed Pumps 3 at 76 g d each 4 Ammonia Storage 150 gallons 5 Ammonia Feed Pumps 3 um s 6 Corrosion Inhibitor Storage 100 gallons 7 Corrosion Inhibitor Feed Pump 1 pump 8 Hydropneumatic Tank 3,170 gallons 9 Generator 90 KW 10 Fuel Storage 576 Gallons 11 Cartridge Filters 4-300 g m cartridge filters 12 Hi h Service Pum s each with Variable Frequency Drive 2-400 gpm @ 140' pumps JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-6 093010 The treatment facilities were in good condition at the time of inspection. Specific items noted for repair or replacement are summarized below: 1. The float system in the ground storage tank needs to be replaced. 2. A cover is needed over the chemical storage tanks located outside. 3. Air conditioning for the controls located inside the building is recommended. 4. The windows in the building are in need of replacement. 5. An interior storage space is recommended. 6. The generator is undersized and has reached its useful life and should be replaced. The improvements identified above are generally maintenance related, and are identified as such in the recommended capital improvements program discussed in Section 8 of this report. In addition to the improvements identified above, it is recommended that additional treatment facilities be installed to provide 4 -log virus removal or inactivation without exceeding the disinfection by product regulations. Recommendations for water treatment improvements are further discussed in Section 7 of this report. 3.4 WATER BOOSTER STATION The City owns a water booster station located in Everglades City. Water leaving the treatment facility is pumped to the water booster station and disinfected prior to being distributed to customers in Everglades City, Chokoloskee and Plantation. Customers in Copeland receive water directly from the treatment facility in Copeland. The water booster station components are summarized in Table 3-3 below. Table 3-3 Water Booster Station No. 'Component Capacity / Volume 1 Precast Ground Storage Tank 500,000 gallons 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Storage 75 gallons 3 Sodium Hypo hlorite feed pumps 2 at 60 g d 4 Ammonia Storage (not in operation) 100 gallons 5 Ammonia Feed Pumps 2 at 6 gpd 6 Generator 350 KW 7 Hi h Service Pum s 2-300 gpm 8 Jockey Pumps 2-60 gpm 9 Fire Pump (out of service) 1-300 g m gas powered pump JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-7 093010 The water booster station was generally in good condition at the time of the site inspection. Recommended maintenance improvements that have been included in the capital program are identified below: 1. Fire pump was not operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. 2. Outdoor chemical storage needs a roof. 3. A control room with air conditioning is recommended. 4. The existing control system may require replacement. JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 3.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 3-8 093010 SECTION 4 WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION 4.1 GENERAL The Everglades City wastewater treatment system provides service to the incorporated areas of the City and to portions of Copeland and Chokoloskee. Plantation Island is not served by the Everglades City wastewater system; however, because the residents of Plantation Island utilize septic tanks, extending wastewater service to this area would be a benefit to the region. The existing wastewater treatment plant has a capacity of 0.16 MGD on an annual average daily flow basis. The existing treatment process generally consists of flow equalization, aeration, secondary clarification, filtration and disinfection. An aerial of the site is illustrated in Figure 4-1. The existing wastewater collection system is a low pressure system utilizing individual grinder pump stations. Tetra Tech conducted a site inspection of the wastewater facilities on April 6, 2010. A summary of our observations is included within this section along with insights gathered from City staff and the regulatory files. Photographs of the existing facilities can be found in Figure 4-2. Recommended capital improvements can be found in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. 4.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM The wastewater collection system includes approximately 245 grinder pump stations in the City of Everglades City, approximately 5 grinder pump stations in Chokoloskee, and two master pump stations (one in Chokoloskee and one in Copeland). All existing grinder pumps were manufactured by E/One, and all have a similar configuration with a check valve in the wetwell. Approximately fourteen (14) of the existing grinder pump stations are duplex and all other are simplex design. The collection system is fairly new and is generally in good condition. Recommended improvements include: 1. Electrical upgrades are required at the Chokoloskee master pump station. 2. The influent lines to both master pump stations need to be flushed to clear debris. 3. A valve vault is needed at the Copeland master pump station. 4.3 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT The existing wastewater treatment plant is located in the City of Everglades City at Copeland Avenue and Kumquat Street, and the existing treatment components include: i�`6�•� t'c t'ttt.'rr'crr JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 4-1 093010 EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN loo WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIGURE 4-1 =k rsT } �1 8 w x z � � JLu v iI I ; � ti z - N „ PLANTATION PKW Y EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGMENT SYSTEM MASTER PLAN loo WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIGURE 4-1 I Everglades City TETRATECHI Water Management System Master Plan Figure Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant 4-2 • Flow Equalization • Aeration • Secondary Clarifiers • Aerobic Sludge Digestion • Sludge Drying Beds • Filtration • Chlorination • Dechlorination • Reject Storage • Reclaimed Storage • Surface Water Discharge Most of the treatment facilities at the existing plant include either steel or glass lined steel tanks. At the time of inspection, several of the tanks were in poor condition and in need of immediate repair. Specific items noted for repair include: 1. Flow equalization tank needs new mixers and controls, 2. Clarifiers need new internal equipment, 3. Return activated sludge pumps and valves need to be replaced, 4. Filter track, chain and rails need to be replaced, 5. Chlorine contact chamber needs to be replaced, 6. Gas chlorination needs to be replaced, 7. At least one of the five aeration tanks was leaking and needs to be repaired or replaced, 8. Both digesters were leaking and need to be repaired or replaced, 9. Drying beds need new valves, 10. Flow charts need to be replaced, 11. Reuse meter needs to be replaced, 12. Blowers need to be replaced, 13. An influent bar screen and grit removal system is recommended. In addition to the items noted above, the reclaimed water appeared foamy and turbid within the chlorine contact chamber. Based on the number of improvements needed, it is recommended that the wastewater treatment facility be replaced. Recommended options are presented in Sections 7 and 8 of this report. JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 4-4 093010 4.4 SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE The existing operations permit allows for a surface water discharge of 0.1 MGD, AADF to Lake Placid Canal, a Class III Marine Water. However, the surface water discharge has not been utilized in several years. It is included in the new operations permit as a backup to the reclaimed water system. Prior to discharge to surface water, effluent is dechlorinated. 4.5 RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM The City has two permitted options for land application of reclaimed water. The existing 0.115 MGD, AADF rapid infiltration basin and the 0.152 MGD, AADF slow rate public access reuse system. The reuse system consists of irrigation of residential lawns, landscape areas, roadway medians, the airport, the school and a park. Approximately twenty (20) homes receive reclaimed water for irrigation. Reclaimed water service is provided at no charge. i JLW/slm/masterplan/Section 4.doc Tt#P200-04546-10003 4-5 093010 SECTION 7 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS 7.1 GENERAL Based on the system evaluations and regulatory requirements described previously in this report, potential alternatives for the water and wastewater treatment facility capital improvements will be identified in this section. Recommendations for other components of the capital improvements program can be found in Section 8 of this report. 7.2 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES The following subsection summarizes potable water treatment technologies that have been used successfully in water treatment to meet the established by FDEP requirements. This subsection includes a brief description of each process and the specific contaminants that can be removed or treated by that process. Improvement alternatives described below include: 1. Alternative 1: Use of the existing water treatment facilities with new deeper fresh water supply wells, 2. Alternative 2: Installation of filtration facilities and use of the existing water supply wells, 3. Alternative 3: Installation of new brackish water supply wells with a membrane water treatment system. All improvement options are based on a water plant capacity of 0.5 MGD. 7.2.1 Alternative 1: New Fresh Water Supply Wells with Existing Treatment There is limited groundwater quality data available in the project area. However, based on the data that is available, there may be fresh water available from the semi -confined gray limestone aquifer, which would not be considered under the influence of surface water. Appendix H includes a report entitled, Hydrogeology of the Gray Limestone Aquifer in Southern Florida by r�r�za 7-r:cri JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-1 093010 the U. S. Geological Survey which has some information in the vicinity of the project. A test well at the existing water treatment facility would be required in order to determine if a fresh water aquifer exists in this location. For the purpose of this report, planning level costs for the construction of three (3) new water supply wells utilizing the existing water treatment facilities have been included in Table 7-1. Table 7-1 Alternative 1 Preliminary Planning Level Cost New Fresh Water Supply Wells with Existing Treatment No. Description[ Planning Level Cost 1 New Water Supply Wells and Pumps $600,000 2 Electrical and Instrumentation $120,000 3 Site Work $90,000 4 Yard Piping $120,000 Subtotal $930,000 5 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $65,100 6 Contingency $279,000 7 Engineering $93,000 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $1,367,100 7.2.2 Alternative 2: Existing Water Supply Wells with Additional Treatment The existing water supply wells are likely under the direct influence of surface water (UDI). Use of these wells will require additional treatment such as filtration to provide protection against parasites commonly found in surface water. Disinfection provides the primary barrier against the transmission of waterborne disease for drinking water, but filtration is needed as a secondary barrier when water supply wells are considered UDI. Direct filtration refers to filtration without prior settling, and is the type of filtration that would be required at the Everglades City water plant. Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filtration systems can be used to adsorb organic materials for removal. GAC has a structure that is extremely porous which allows water to pass through with relatively low headloss, yet has a wide variety of pore sizes which can allow for small and large organic molecules to be absorbed. After some time period, the absorptive capacity of the carbon JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-2 093010 will be exhausted. The carbon is commonly taken off-site to be thermally recharged or is replaced. Bench scale or pilot tests are typically necessary to determine the suitability for use with the raw water, the amount of TOC that can be removed, and carbon usage. Planning level cost information for the installation of a GAC filtration system at the existing water treatment facility can be found in Table 7-2. Table 7-2 Alternative 2 Preliminary Planning Level Cost Existing Water Supply Wells with Additional Treatment No. Description Planning Level Cost 1 New Well Pumps $90,000 2 GAC Filtration System $700,000 3 Electrical and Instrumentation $158,000 4 Site Work $79,000 5 Yard Piping $158,000 Subtotal $1,185,000 6 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $82,950 7 Contingency $355,500 8 Engineering $118,500 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $1,741,950 7.2.3 Alternative 3: New Brackish Water Supply Wells with Membrane Treatment A third option of constructing brackish water supply wells was considered. This option would require the removal of total dissolved solids by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane treatment. Reverse osmosis membranes typically reject a large percentage of monovalent ions such as sodium and chloride. RO membranes also require a greater feed pressure to remove smaller monovalent ions because the membranes are characterized by a smaller nominal pore size. RO systems also require a means of disposal of the concentrate stream that is subject to more stringent regulations. Preliminary design of membrane systems requires computer analysis to optimize the treatment process. The software can help project which membranes elements can achieve the desired water quality, determine feed pressure requirements, and calculate the percentage of permeate flow at optimum conditions. Planning level cost information for the installation of an RO water treatment facility can be found in Table 7-3. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-3 093010 Table 7-3 Alternative 3 Preliminary Planning Level Cost New Brackish Water Supply Wells with Membrane Treatment No. Description Planning Level Cost 1 New Water Supply Wells and Pumps $750,000 2 RO Treatment Process and Building $750,000 3 Concentrate Disposal Well $2,000,000 4 Electrical and Instrumentation $700,000 5 Site Work $350,000 6 Yard Piping $525,000 Subtotal $5,075,000 7 Mobilization, Bonds, Permits, General Requirements $355,250 8 Contingency $1,522,500 9 Engineering $507,500 Total Estimated Planning Level Cost $7,460,250 7.3 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Of the three alternatives discussed above, alternative 1 will have the lowest operation and maintenance (O&M) cost, and the costs should be similar to the City's current O&M cost to operate the existing facilities. O&M costs for alternative 2 will be more than the City's current O&M cost due to increased energy requirements for pumping and regular replacement of the activated carbon. These increased costs will likely be in the range of 125-150% of the City's current O&M cost. O&M costs for alternative 3 will be significantly more than the City's current O&M cost due to increased energy requirements of the reverse osmosis water treatment process. These costs will likely be in the range of 150-200% of the City's current O&M budget. 7.4 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS For planning purposes, components of alternatives 1 and 2 have been included in the capital program described in Section 8 of this report. It is recommended that the City construct an exploratory well at the existing water treatment facility to determine water quality in the gray limestone aquifer. However, for planning purposes, the full capital cost of alternative 2 is Fri' frMtn-trt:w JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-4 093010 included in the recommended capital program if water quality requires the addition of filtration to the existing water treatment process. 7.5 WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES This subsection will review the recommendations for the required 0.5 MGD wastewater treatment facilities. Everglade City's current operating permit issued by.FDEP includes stringent effluent limits due to the existence of a surface water discharge. The limits for CBOD5, TSS, TN, and TP are currently 5.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 1.0 mg/L, respectively. These limits generally correspond to a level of treatment known as "advanced wastewater treatment" (AWT). Less stringent limits are appropriate for spray irrigation of effluent; however, it is not practical to alter the treatment process immediately prior to initiating discharge, therefore, for planning purposes, it is prudent to assume continued provision of AWT. The removal of CBOD5, TSS, TN, and TP to the levels required for surface water discharge will involve the using one of the many modifications of the activated sludge process. Removing CBOD5 and TSS is relatively straightforward, and conventional activated sludge processes including aeration and settling can usually be employed to attain fairly high levels of removal for these constituents. Meeting a 5.0 mg/L limit for either these parameters would typically involve filtration or some other enhanced method of solids separation. Increased treatment involving removal of nitrogen and phosphorus still involves the use of an activated sludge process, however, anaerobic and anoxic conditions must developed at certain stages within the process to encourage the growth of certain organisms, and provide environments that will result in desired metabolic activities. These conditions can be attained by dividing the basins into specific zones or by operating certain equipment in a cyclical basis, as is the case with sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). This assignment is conceptual in nature and it is beyond the current scope to examine in detail every feasible treatment process modification that will provide AWT. Accordingly, this section only addresses conventional technologies that are routinely employed at facilities throughout the State of Florida that are similar in size to the Everglades City WWTP. Such technologies include: 1) a dual train package plant employing biological nutrient removal (BNR), 2) a dual -train membrane bioreactor (MBR) employing BNR, and 3) an SBR with appropriate phasing to provide BNR. Each process is discussed below. IFTNA ILCH JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-5 093010 7.5.1 Alternative ]:Conventional BNR Package Plant When BNR is required at a small to medium sized WWTP, typically, some form of the "Bardenpho Process" is often utilized since it is well documented, reliable, and cost-effective. Brief descriptions of the two most common configurations are generally described below. 4 -Stage Biological Nutrient Removal Process: This process configuration is generally known as the 4 -Stage Bardenpho Process and it is usually used when effluent limits for TN are very stringent. The flow configuration for this process is virtually the same as the one for the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Process; however, another anoxic stage is provided after the aerobic stage to increase nitrogen removal. Also, a small aerobic or reaeration stage is provided after the second anoxic stage to increase the DO concentration of the mixed liquor prior to clarification to prevent further denitrification in the secondary clarifiers. The denitrification rates in the second anoxic stage are much lower than those in the first anoxic stage due to the low concentration of readily biodegradable organic compounds. The process provides high levels of CBOD5 and TSS removal and effluent TN concentrations as low as 2 to 3 mg/L; however, the process does not provide significant biological phosphorus removal. 5 -Stage Biological Nutrient Removal Process: The 5 -Stage process simply adds an additional basin to the 4 -Stage process. In this case, a fermentation stage is provided upstream of the 4 - Stage Bardenpho Process and the RAS is discharged to the fermentation stage rather than the first anoxic stage. This process is generally known as the 5 -Stage Bardenpho Process or the Modified Bardenpho Process. The fermentation stage provides the anaerobic preconditioning necessary to achieve enhanced biological phosphorus uptake in a later stage, like in the A2/O Process. The subsequent 4 -stages provide CBOD5 removal, nitrification and denitrification in the same manner as they do in the 4 -Stage Bardenpho process. This configuration is used when effluent limits are extremely stringent. Usually high levels of CBOD5 and TSS removal are achieved and effluent TN concentrations are in the range of 2 to 3mg/L. Without chemical addition, effluent TP concentrations range from 1 to 2 mg/L. If lower levels of TP need to be achieved, a small amount of alum is usually added upstream of the settling process. Figure I, below, presents general flow schematic for various BNR treatment processes. mei'RATECH JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-6 093010 Figure 1: Typical Continuous Flow Processes for BNR WWTPs 1\TLI'E\-1 " .vY0U4 CyylEq EFPLEE\T I\ ] 1`ivgil gERAHIC' w Hive Remo.nl )R RAS MODHTEDLLJ)ZACR.ETTIYGERPROC£SS LYTLL'E\2 £FELL= • F£A14, AyOSIc -APROWc CFARffIey TY 12mgH TP-1-b.'T. IR R R:AS ACOPROCISS LVFLC£RP PIRSf ... YL9.W REi£d. � CIUIIRR E£FLU.\'T �y�, 3RROBIC AYOk1C JJJ \'o HIOPRemo�rl R RAS { T.AGEB.II ESTHOPRGCESS LYFLL y'E\I EFFLLE\I T\ SSmg1 cuBRH:A PW4 }ry5i APROBIC sEAW ftC1PR hYOUt .iYQUC iP 1 ] mg.1 RAS WAS i -STAGE &. DENTHO PROCESS FFLLFVT O oaQ oD4Q v.Nb g � i ACk891C R- l 'VStOBIC: '!£ROB/C � Yo H�oP Aeiool'nl RAS RAS STEP -TEED M PROCESS Implementing any one of the processes illustrated above, in a package plant is relatively simple. Appropriately sized reactors need to be provided along with the required mixing, aeration and solids separation facilities. In a small WWTP, circular ring steel or concrete tanks are usually very cost-effective. Under this concept two equally sized circular basins must be provided for reliability and each basin would include a concentric basin which acts as a clarifier. The annular space between the clarifier and outer wall is used to provide the requisite anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic zones. Further, the annular space can include segments for flow equalization and aerobic digestion, if necessary. External filtration facilities are needed in addition to the biological process basins to ensure compliance with the CBODs and TSS limits. Also, a separate dual- JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-7 093010 chamber chlorine contact tank would be necessary for disinfection. The only disadvantage this concept is the space requirements when compare to an MBR configuration. The estimated cost to construct a full conventional package plant including preliminary treatment, circular treatment basins/clarifiers, tertiary filters, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $5,700,000. 7.5.2 Alternative 2: Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) An SBR treatment configuration involves a batch process instead of continuous feed scenario. There are numerous configurations of SBRs, however the most common ones include two or treatment basins with mixing, aeration, and decanting equipment. This allows development of anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic conditions, as well as intermittent quiescent settling conditions needed for solids separation. Typically, SBR's have four basic treatment stages which include: fill, react, settle, and draw. During the fill and react stages mixing and aeration equipment is cycled to create specific conditions that will result in the oxidation of carbonaceous material, nitrification, denitrification, and anaerobic conditioning that leads to increase uptake of phosphorus. The settling phase simply involves shutting off all mixing and aeration equipment for a given basin or cell to promote solids separation. Usually, the mixed liquor is allowed to settle until clear water or supernatant develops in the upper 30% of the tank. The draw stage most commonly involves the controlled removal of the supernatant from the basin. An equalization basin is routinely provided downstream of an SBR process to attenuate the peak flows that result from decanting. In the case of Everglades City, an equalization basin would be advisable, since filtration facilities would be necessary. SBRs can be quite reliable and cost-effective for secondary treatment; however, development of the conditions needed for the anaerobic preconditioning required for phosphorus removal could present some operational challenges. The estimated cost to construct a full SBR WWTP including preliminary treatment, rectangular treatment basins, secondary equalization basin, tertiary filters, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $5,100,000. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-8 093010 7.5.3 Wastewater Alternative 3: Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) A membrane bioreactor (MBR) is the combination of a suspended growth chamber or bioreactor followed by a membrane filtration, either microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF). In general, the membrane system replaces the clarification and filtration unit operations. The MBR processes can produce a high quality effluent, particularly with respect to TSS and turbidity. One general advantage of MBR over conventional processes is the small footprint which results from operating at high mixed liquor TSS concentrations and from the elimination of the settling and filtration facilities. Another advantage associated with membranes is the elimination of sludge settling concerns. There are currently two basic types of configurations for MBR treatment facilities. In the first configuration the membranes are immersed in the biological reactor. In the second configuration the membrane facilities are installed in a separate basin external to the biological reactor. Internal membrane installation is preferred to the side stream configuration for domestic wastewater treatment. The internal configuration usually includes aeration to maintain solids in suspension, scour the membrane surface, and provide oxygen to the biomass. Membrane life and fouling issues are the most serious problems associated with MBR treatment systems. Fouling can lead to a significant increase in hydraulic resistance and frequent membrane cleaning and replacement may be required, increasing the operating costs. The useful life of a unit membrane varies depending upon manufacturer. There is not an abundance of long- term operating data to support claims made the various manufacturers which introduces a level of uncertainty when evaluating this technology. Currently, data indicates that the average useful life of a membrane is approximately 7 years, which is a potential disadvantage of the MBR process. For the Everglades City WWTP, an MBR treatment option would be very similar to the process configuration provided under Alternative 1. A 5 -stage process with anaerobic, anoxic, aerobic and reaeration stage would be necessary, however, the basins would be much smaller and clarification and filtration facilities would not be needed. The estimated cost to construct an MBR WWTP employing a 5 -stage BNR process including preliminary treatment, rectangular treatment basins, chlorine contact chamber, disinfection system, aerated sludge holding tank, and effluent pumping system for a capacity of 0.5 MGD is approximately $6,700,000. H . i_t .er�cnvsCr� JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-9 093010 7.6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENACE COSTS The O&M costs for the three wastewater treatment alternatives discussed above should be similar to the City's cost to operate the existing facilities. 7.7 WASTEWATER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Alternative 1 is recommended for the City's capital improvements program. A package BNR process will provide a consistently high quality effluent and significantly improved operability over the existing facilities. It should be noted that if alternative 3 were selected, the City could potentially utilize a significant portion of the existing site for another land use or sell the property. The planning level capital cost differential between alternatives 1 and 3 is approximately $1 million. An analysis of land value was not conducted to determine if the land value would justify the increased capital cost, but may be a consideration in future analyses. f��A"' 2��raavect� JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 7 Tt#P200-04546-10003 7-10 093010 SECTION 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 8.1 GENERAL This section presents recommended capital improvements for the 20 year planning period. The recommended capital improvements program (CIP) should be evaluated every five (5) years to address population growth variations, regulatory changes, inflationary price increases and to update the status of the on-going capital program. 8.2 RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The recommended CIP is shown in Table 8-1, and generally includes the improvements described below. 8.2.1 Drinking Water System Capital Improvements Program Years 1-5 Exploratory Welland Treatment Improvements The proposed drinking water system improvements for years 1-5 include construction of an exploratory well to determine if a fresh water source that is deeper than the existing water supply wells and not under the influence of surface water exists at the water treatment facility, specifically, these improvements should include: • Construct an exploratory well at the treatment site in Copeland, • Evaluate water quality at the new deeper water source, • Perform pilot testing on the new water supply source, • Construct additional water supply wells, • Design and construct new water treatment facilities, • Consider interconnecting the Lee Cypress water system once the Everglades system is in compliance. Consumptive use permitting services are included in the CIP to address the request for additional information sent by the South Florida Water Management District in 2008. The recommended services include development of a numeric model, identification of wetlands impacts and providing the additional documentation requested. A preliminary project schedule for the exploratory well program can be found below: JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 TOP200-0454640003 8-1 093010 TABLE 8-1 CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MASTERPLAN Recommended 20 Year Capital Improvements Program Project: CIP Years 1-5 ':CUP Years 5-10 CIP Years 10-15 CIP Years 15-20 t Drinking Waters stem Improvements Water Supply Exploratory Well $300,000 Treatment Improvements $1,800,000 Treatment Plant Maintenance Improvements $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 Booster Station Maintenance Improvements $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Consumptive Use remaining $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $75,000 Lee Cypress Water System Interconnect $250,000 Subtotal Drinking Water System $2,950,000 $550,000 $550,000 $575,000 Wastewater System Improvements Treatment Plant Improvements $5,700,000 $50,000 Treatment Plant Maintenance Improvements $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Collection and Transmission Maintenance Improvements $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Plantation Island Master Lift Station $150,000 Plantation Island Interconnect $500,000 Sewer System Connection Program $1,000,000 $350,000 $350,000 Subtotal Wastewaters stem $6,4509000 $2400000 $1,150000 $1,100,000 Storm Water Master Planning Effort $10U00 'TBU I TBD TBD Total S Year CIP Rounded $9,500,000 $3,000,000 $1700,000 $1,700,000 JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-2 093010 A preliminary schedule for the design and construction of the treatment components is illustrated in Table 8-2: Table 8-2 Preliminary Treatment Component Design and Construction Schedule Task: Duration (Days) Starts Finish Treatment Option Review and Recommendations 30 July 14, 2011 August 13, 2011 Coordination with Everglades City 45 August 13, 2011 September 27, 2011 Pilot Equipment Procurement 45 September 27, 2011 November 11, 2011 Pilot Testing 90 November 11, 2011 February 9, 2012 Treatment Plant Design 120 November 11, 2011 March 10, 2012 Permitting 45 March 10, 2012 Aril 24, 2012 Bidding 30 Aril 24, 2012 May 24, 2012 Award Recommendation/Notice of Award 15 May 24, 2012 June 8, 2012 Pre -Construction Meeting/Notice-to- Proceed 1 I June 8, 2012 June 9, 2012 Construction 180 June 9, 2012 December 6, 2012 Contract Closeout 30 December 6, 2012 January 5, 2013 Certification and Startup 60 December 6, 2012 February 4, 2013 Following completion of the water treatment facility improvements, it is recommended that the Everglades City water system be interconnected with the Lee Cypress Co-op. The Lee Cypress water system serves approximately 250 homes and is not in compliance with drinking water regulations. Interim Operational Changes to Address Regulatory Compliance Currently, at the treatment facility, the City doses the raw water with free chlorine prior to the water storage tank and doses finished water with chlorine and ammonia prior to distribution. Changing this protocol to include an ammonia feed point to the raw water prior to the ground storage tank should resolve the TTHM and HAA violations on an interim basis. With a combined chloramine residual, CT requirements cannot be met prior to the first drinking water customer. However, if the City were to cap the center well that has on-going microbial issues, and operate the remaining two wells free of total coli form or E. coli bacteria incidents, the system would be in compliance. Once the proposed exploratory / production well is completed (anticipated 2011), it should be evaluated to determine if placing it online prior to treatment improvements would improve TTHM / HAA or CT compliance issues. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-3 093010 Maintenance Improvements In addition, it is recommended that the CIP include $500,000 every five years for water system maintenance or renewal and replacement projects. Typically these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments. Specific water system maintenance projects that are necessary at this time include: Water Treatment Plant: 1. The float system in the ground storage tank needs to be replaced. 2. A cover is needed over the chemical storage tanks located outside. 3. Air conditioning for the controls located inside the building is recommended. 4. The windows in the building are in need of replacement. 5. An interior storage space is recommended. 6. The generator is undersized and has reached its useful life and should be replaced. Water Booster Station: 1. Ammonia system should be placed into service as soon as possible. 2. Fire pump was not operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. 3. Outdoor chemical storage needs a roof. 4. A control room with air conditioning is recommended. 5. The existing control system may require replacement. Capital Improvements Program Years 5-20 Following completion of the improvements identified above, the remaining capital program includes on-going renewal and replacement and permitting services. Equipment renewal and replacement should be on an as -needed basis, but some general guidelines can be found below. l._ JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-4 093010 No. Description Frequency 1 Activated Carbon Media Replacement 6 Months — 2 Years 2 Above Ground Equipment Paintin 3-5 Years 3 Flow Meter Replacement 5 Years 4 Chemical Feed Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 5-10 Years 5 Ground Storage Tank Painting and Repair 10 Years 6 Filter Media Replacement 10-15 Years 7 Well Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 10-15 Years 8 High Service Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 10 - 15 Years 9 Meter and Instrumentation Refurbishment or Replacement 10-15 Years 10 Generators and Fuel Tanks 10-15 Years 11 Valve Refurbishment or Replacement 15-20 Years 12 Water Main Replacement As Needed Consumptive use permitting is included every 5 years and includes summarizing data collected at monitoring stations, preparation of required forms and required documentation. During years 15-20, addition consumptive use permitting is included as it is anticipated that the permit will be in a renewal stage at that time. 8.2.2 Wastewater System Capital Improvements Program Years 1-5 Based on the number of repair or replacement items noted at the existing wastewater treatment facility, a complete replacement of the treatment facilities is recommended during the first 5 years of the capital program. Additional details on the wastewater treatment facility recommendations can be found in Sections 4 and 7 of this report. In addition to improvements to the treatment facilities, it is recommended that the CIP include $750,000 every 5 years for maintenance or renewal and replacement. As with the water system, these types of capital projects would be grant funded or financed in 3-5 year increments. Specific maintenance projects that are necessary at this time include: 1. Electrical upgrades are required at the Chokoloskee master pump station. 2. The influent lines to both master pump stations need to be flushed to clear debris. 3. A valve vault is needed at the Copeland master pump station. JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-5 093010 Capital Improvements Program Years 5-20 Following completion of the improvements identified above, it is recommended that Plantation Island be connected to the wastewater system. As discussed earlier in this report, Plantation Island is currently on septic tank, and interconnecting this area to the wastewater system would benefit the region. The remaining capital program includes on-going renewal and replacement. Equipment renewal and replacement should be on an as -needed basis, but some general guidelines can be found below. No. Description Frequency 1 Above Ground Equipment Painting 3-5 Years 2 Flow Meter Replacement 5 Years 3 Chemical Feed Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 5-10 Years 4 Generators and Fuel Tanks 10-15 Years 5 Blowers and Electrical Controls 12-15 Years 6 Steel Tank Replacement 15-20 Years 7 Pump Refurbishment or Replacement 15-20 Years 0 JTE'I AATF.S'H JLW/sma/masterplan/Section 8 Tt#P200-04546-10003 8-6 093010 PREPARED FOR COLLIER COUNTY Hole Montes, Inc. June 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVERGLADES CITY DOCUMENTATION - POTABLE WATER SYSTEM TAB W4 -N ANCHOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS MAPPING MARCH 2000 37 Pages /,lig f�QV-rC11'sn3 X13 lY13S k � 31V m Saaaaa �sasssass���sa� w,< rxxrr wwwww Dl oa00009��� 5 5355�3H H ,��ooYrcrcNn (f). ..�°..tee°m O o"000N000 Ann-- Cf) nn— a 0 O LL Cd Q w 5 Q O H VJ LU I A.. O Cf) Cf) LL_ 0 z �U � a- LMS Q Q J Ir (� W r Q W W a 0 O LL Cd Q w 5 Q O H jsAM X577 a yrs y4� will', L ;151 s ��`� t� ;� `r' .fir ! z,.. }�� G� �t :1 }�y ``mac id �«.� �±� M°' ';%„"7,2�•�£:� � k• 4 i ��'�' f� '�''� • ry [i� v 47 '. 12 'w & dl ,y 1 110 `•�i iii t �.� � � k 3 ; � U aG 'o x ' Y rp4 rF kTM y.' E� il i.�'J i +x 11 sAllr� �F, '" tCL u N o EN kT 'g x, �.. �d •. 6 � 10 1, u'Au 16 1 =s r � ISM xv a fJ 1� N rm' vu 9 r CAM, w `�, 5 ^`c Woo Y< q r t I C r!PT 1 MgoAS r FFy,y _ r ✓+ `xl i a F Sh { I x J a V M V AL < y d a 9 p N,�b i kil I "& a r �'d 1r4 �'A t A .rl mm „� s, I lima a.s, F L5 x f�^ ,a'x°.E r .� 1a5� M"" .f 6 �' s )l '#i TI, -5c, >5e<J �� kt or _ P `. y,.S'X" r s 5 /1 R 3 �`i.r�3 F f,lqp,vInv 171,r u 1t s ¢¢ x f L 4 $ � fJ e✓ '- ,/ N '✓ h vt i � I � � rt: Lz �"� a t:^, _r hls �s f °ul jL z'asw Aja , ka >nt T\ YP@ice Yz .re} If § �� � �Y ti 1� � y � 4 �4 �✓ � V5 ,�,✓ w s R YTdoj R �"'�uo$mm,r� "1 s e� w I� P 1 t Y =u -i , "rs�'r .[ +f r }}R+slty?n [c'b €•r F - any s '�s , IE9Pti;y� a avu I _ y I I a I r Aa 3.rya F �.. �I C s ✓ 2 a �- t a 3 r?�; fl ,5'2 I `Y)g r m,INV g gosWTI— r� 14 s. ml - nr ry tir .0 r r k + tit a rl xlr s r 5 s �,- "Ayfows! pay NO �t4I v� aR y. 1 L r i c ^� ,r Ear x U r C 5 Ir r In "Tn � r , =1 s ,i i s .� Iti Iaf t li Iz II� Iii 2 f' f �, q ,,, r Y t r Ili [e'f R r .4 I, r' a I'. ysw, fL �f IYrt fi t 1' .Y.:: S � � 1l I x __.. .. ___---I- - - I - ---i Wiz§\Q 2 � \, \ N juj >T16 to:o� W I � G rl 12 No 52 �T7 r9+i ,fix 1 Irl it 0 TT t 71 it li� hio u I,iI ill im1111ki it 1 g- -.4 H Ill It Ill ill I 11Hill ill ill 9 HI T F TF Tl� , fli T1 a N TT , gy wp II it i Ili I Ti 0 n W it >: A 4 Waoo rl w It z < >LU AN -14 Ilk 53 4- ?Pk -9 d Fl -1 k —F lip 01 g". 1 it Ih M41dry �''_ 31V011' imp n ° r I �A - 7A I4)r » III Cg it EF! i 1 it mho a ,y a i. S. ri � II ia. t 3 {�M Ay+ I �q}1 666\I Ii 1111 I I III y � �,x ) _J aaJ K �1N 1 +)Fd 1 III wg r'SF 1_ k 1Jy �i '.IIS II III � i 'x�i�No+6f b1 1 °Y NJ HJ1bW\ 'Y ti T A:F , 11 11 x � Il Via I I IIII tlwt/�..' III �. III{{ I L �I Sr of .�Y II 1 1! I II I I I II d � �� 1. I �✓� I i1 I ti z. �+ 1?II II 1 I m e xt I IIII ag III E I' 3'4, 8 w x� . _ A F 11-"'"-'q i', �iM 1 ISM �I r I' W W mar h��s i L x O 1 •+1 >e cs Lr ,3 I '�,, 1 'y''f r J $ LL Z t- l�io WE I I " ,, i I i 1"�'' a .°` I I _ I Q q 1 3 WY` 1 qfri1� •. 1 YYyi �� 11 , ij tj J IIII 5 'i'f. W 0 1 f3...1 .,fpr II i �I .... it ,ifit I. ' YM r 'tea fi I I I 1'F d S IhI'Y ,l 1 .e t I xt✓ J2 s �r III AL �# e o �zb a aNn xJi CW �dy 4� .'•I 1 I 7�^ M41dry �''_ 31V011' r I I aezr� lnw I III J,. , III t1 I � W I I� I IIII IIII I. I n ��� � III III I I I 1 f5w1$ �` III III 11 I AIR& 1 l N �f l III tl IIIIIiW III Ri iS I r 74y ave i e - a S ~ I ;q II ��+,,�� �' id3 i W i 15, FII I WIN I'M f , Y \ _ .iM"k III 3.^3 i �t b'`rzrt✓$I� L� fl 'r+ 1 c ,` Lt'.-zt'� Sal -»�'9 J 1 O J >ARM i J,\LLt' � F YTS w Z 1 < J 2 cc fGi�'� I IIII VIII =� kt?f I1iiN3y ! iI' F- W {4 �, i' V} dp 1 r a�"tl@srt,7� I 1 Q W �a{`+ v11 III ,+t a. I I�I 1 y4 III III II IIII LLL "Pin "#,fs �A II � I.� I � I� I 1 'I III � r -�ml aRv %III ' . I I - I I t v a t IIS , roq d I II, I 41 I Jcb �'tl v tlti>a n I 1 - x{3; _ _ - - tlis 3Nn� I' ., .0 ➢,„ -.I'- Y I �- IPI F11M1� g.F ;;r #• A. }i III ��s'FSsQ� - s;?a 11 III I I �� III Ti' L'1 y I 4 a I III � lf9 io v�lQ� 16 JNII N�lY!'1 n ' Fv. raryas - b y �• '. �- Ti 44 q I +.tll. GkV M A �S} � f A � � I -- I OTW I n j G m ��1 �. �I� I • � III 16 [nl°� Y2 I �� �� sa - t .rr t3 II i � I I I' I 1'�I � k I I J'1 III II I 3y,av' II I s 4 { I + p � \ � yy44 S 00}hLb Yl6 3NIl I(J1Y 4Y' � � � ri' i' J tq LL No .fits W c p¢ 4 I A is 'g� -. _ u�F a -�-�- 9 �I r s'4 a°ft< I I ��♦ F zy� � � �i III �. F 4)�}fi Ah /'. �A V,•^� I III �- I I I .'. � Fab S� �. ,., r t3 n i X-lid A�� 4'�w'h'`vA' b nl aNn r �pygS�ij' I I Kid 'I y Il:irY Mw'w�l YEA {?� �7 IIS Ilti'',��'i99✓.A� _. ,. o o h u b4-G.��s. � - , ,�� N — - - { I,z r,rV\ "fife 1-T�II II T II $is'� Sr III' Ili — v i Y r'> j. /4i 1 u ,✓..a ,. I a 4 N'.1 �inr4 III 6, �_ �iX I I 'f, � I 3 e I tP I I I '��� ,• � I'f I � -�+ua I I II ' st�rl4X� 4i`al I ^� �r I I i �_ c ,rr,'F.g�;? �._;, I l MA A" i g h �r� - L i ,r r} t III III J ,Ig - ��� IziS"ol ill I I I I' M r� 0,13 v Mg 9Bb 15 3N/l NVIJ �iSoue 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII: 1 l LL ,,a �I ri o. 1, 5'�v:�iYtSl e ; 4 r � t PV mo8o•-i .x^ , ^� W o 5 1' y 0 ¢ LL W 9c cl Z O C F M W al r I I k ,:I s 15 3NIl� C-' §�T \� I E� Q Q w 0 0 Q 0 W 1-000000000 00 v _ O ! O O O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 !OO O®OCSO 00`000® Atlitil tld NOLLtllNtlld a4f - � \ Avg„ (go O OLIO®OO��O x .=i Q O x A3aaxo O O7�g 0000 O I�il Q Of.^l�1Q\\\lJ .000 O O!R.i000O`J 0 ! Illi ® y'.0000©006066 �j O \" � OiY!000 O - O -.n�� 0!_--3xx' tl' KI 0 0 600606©0000 ® j 10 O lal ®O'O O JOI;I!0 Oil;! gO©066060 O ti! —i \0 SII 7 O I„ jO Oi xNax %I:C00000000 0ji0 (g g O 00066® 6 erJ 0 J 0000000 i 3xtli aannaeii ®" s s e ! 'I " W 0 wa.0 (D z z w F- 3 � ( / \ | ) z� 2 �---}-« -\-} � w $ � ! \ ! \ � ( / \ | ) z� 2 ƒ�/ � w $ � 'SAW ; \ ! \ � ( / \ | 2 ƒ�/ � w $ � 'SAW ; ! % { . � ( / J 4 c '� +enaewe Wa N R y o N J LL W O' } ew i4g, waOU N soa QLL N 0 w =F Q Q p€a Fn J [t 'U Z, 3 3v B^g Q > Ad 0^. d e s �6> ¢OE L 3 w aj $a. e9 _ ; yi.