Agenda 01/15/2008 Item # 8A
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 1 of 153
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ-2006-AR-10376: Radio Road Joint Venture, represented by Michael R. Fernandez of
l'lanning Development Incorporated, is requesting a rezone from Industrial (I) zoning district
to thc Commercial Planned Unit Dcvelopment (CPUD) zoning district for the Lane Park
CPUD to allow development of a maximum of 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. The
subject property, consisting of 5.27 acrcs, is located at the northwest corner of Radio Road
(CR 856) and Livingston Road (CR 881), in Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida
OB.JECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) rcview staft's findings and recommendations
along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CepC) regarding the
above referenced rezone to CPUD and render a decision regarding the petition.
CONSIDERA nONS:
The petitioner requests that the BCC approve a rezone of the subject site from tbe I zoning district
to the CPUD zoning district for the Lane Park CPUD. The proposed 5.27i-aere CPUO, if
approved, will allow fbr a maximum of 50.000 square feet of commercial development. The PUD
documents allow tbr a mix of commercial development consistent with the Livingston/Radio Road
Commercial Infill Subdistrict of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), which the
subject property is totally contained within. This GMP Subdistrict listed a number ofrestriction and
conditions such as the restriction that permitted and conditional uses must be restricted to the
generally pennitted land uses of C-3 commercial zoning district. The proposed list of pel111itted
uses is consistent with the land uses allowed in the C-3 commercial district. Additionally this GMP
subdistrict limits the maximum commercial intensity to 50,000 square feet, maximum building
height for commercial structures to 35 feet in a maximum 0 I' three (3) stories, limits the access to
Livingston Road to a right-in/right-out access that is further restricted to the northern one-third of
the frontage on Livingston Road. These restrictions are being implemented with the rezoning of the
subject property as proposed. No deviations are being sought as pmi ofthis pu~ rezoning petition.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
The PUD rezone, by and of itself, will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development, however,
if the pu~ rezone is approved, a portion of the existing land will be developed and the new
development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts
of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified
in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the GMP as needed to maintain adopted Level of
Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency
management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is
Page 1 of 8
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 2 of '! 53
required to pay 50 percent of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project.
Other fees collectcd prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees and
utility fees associated with connecting to the County's water and sewer system. Finally, additional
revenue is generated by upplying ad valorem tax rates to applicable propcliies, and that revenue is
directly related to the value of improvements. Please note that the inclusion of impact fees and taxes
collected are for informational purposes only; they are 1101 included in the criteriu used by Staff und
the CCPC to anulyz.e this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Industrial District,
Livingston/Radio Road Commercia! Inlill Subdistrict, as identilied on the Future Land I ise Map
(FLUM) of the GMP, The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide services, including retail uses, to
surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance to the subject property. The UrbHn
industrial District permits basic industrial uses and limited commercial uses. The Livingston/Radio
Road Commercial Intill Subdistrict allows I()r those permitted and conditional uses set (()rth in the
Commercial Intermediate Zoning District (('-3). The project is consistent with the Livingston/
Radio Road Commcrciallnlill Subdistrict critcriu as noted in the project description.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land arca. In
reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site. the compatibility
analysis might incl ude a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby propeliies as
to allowcd use intensities and densities, development standards such as thc proposed building
heights, setbacks and landscape buffers, as well as the proposed building mass and building
location. The adjacent tracts are developed with industrial uscs within the Industrial zoning district
which limits building heights to a maximum of 50 feet which is higher than what this project
proposes. The development cnvelope on the Master Plan indicates that buildings will be
constructed more or less in the middle (north to south) with the project's access points onto
Livingston and Radio Roads. Staff does not foresee any negative impacts that the proposed project
would have upon the neighboring development. Therefore, staff believes the proposed
development's uses will be compatible with the neighborhood and thus the petition is consistent
with GMP Policy 5.4.
In order to promote smati growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of
Collier County, adherence to Policies 7,1 and 7.3 is required. Policy 7. J encourages connection to
collector and arterial roads. This project is consistent with these policies because the project is
bordered by Radio and Livingston Roads which are both classified as arterial roads,
Policy 7,3 encourages new and existing developments to provide interconnection to other
development. The project is bordered by roadways to the north, east and south, thus no roadway
interconnections would be required in those directions. To the east is a 30-foot wide drainage swale
contained in an easement. To the west of the easement are developed lots within the Collier County
Production Park. Based upon aerial imagery provided in the staff report, an interconnection does
not appear feasible because any interconnection would interfere with either existing buildings or
existing parking areas within the Collier County Production Park.
Page 2 of8
Agenda Item I~o. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 3 of 153
Transportation Element: Transportation Division Planning staff has reviewed the Lane Park
CPUD Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) included in the application back-up material and the CPUD
documents to ensure the CPUD documents contain the appropriate language to address this
project's potentialtral1ic impacts, and to offer a recommendation regarding GMP Transportation
Element Policy 5.1. Those policies require the review of all rezone requests with consideration of
its impact on the overall transportation system, and specifically notes that the County should not
approve any request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or
projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) within the five-year planning period
unless specific mitigating stipulations art' approved.
The project review was based onlhe current TIS guidelines and with respect to GMP Transportation
Element Policy 5. I. The project traffic was distrihuted on the adjacent roadway network and
analyzed through project huild out with consideration given to the five-year planning period. The
proposed zoning creates a net reduction of 125 PM Peak Hour trips when compared to the existing
zoning. The trips generated by. the proposed zoning will e);ceed 3 percent of the service volume on
the iirst adjacent link (Radio Road from Livingston Road 10 i\irpoI1-Pulling Road), but do not
impact any other links in the study area to a greater exlcnt than 3 pcrcen\. The study shows that a
pOlent;al I.,r turning movement f'lilures at the intersection of Radio ,mcl I.,ivingston Roads is
possible in the S-year planning period when the project traffic is included. However. the applicant
has committed to providing a f'lir share payment towards improvements at the intersection of Radio
and Livingston, which are 10 be determined atlhe time of the Development Order application, and
shall serve as mitigation. Furthermore. the adjacent roadway network has adequate capacity to
accommodate this project throughout the Jive-year planning period. Livingston Road, from Radio
Road to Golden Gate Parkway, has a remaining capacity of approximately 1,877 trips, and is
currently at LOS "13" with no programmed improvements. The segment of Radio Road from
Airport-Pulling Road to Livingston Road has a remaining capacity of 530 trips, and is currcntly at
LOS "0" Adequate capacity exists for the project and background traffic on the adjacent link(s),
therefore the project is consistent with Policy 5,1 of the GMP Transportation Element. Therefore,
the Transportation Division Planning staff recommends approval.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Pursuant to Objective 2.4 and Policies 2.4,1
and 6,5.1, an Environmental Impact Statement was not required. 1n accordance with Policy 6.1.1,
twenty-five percent of the existing native vegetation must be retained on-site; the Master Plan
indieates 0.45 aeres will be provided, whieh is in eompliance with the requirement. No
jurisdictional wetlands have been identiiied as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. In aecordance
with Policy 6,2.6, required preservation areas are identified on the PUD Master Plan.
GMP Conclnsion:
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning
to CPUD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consisteney or
inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with
eonditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLUM
designations is a pOliion of the overall iinding that is required, and staff believes the petition is
consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the GMP discussion. The
proposed rezone is also consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed,
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed uses and density may be deemed
consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP,
Page 3 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8,1\
January 15. 20G8
Page 4 of "153
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
This request contains no provisions to address the Affordable-Workforce housing demands that it
may creatc.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services statT has reviewed the petition and thc PUD document to addrcss any
cnvironmental concerns. This petition was not required to submit an Environment Impact Statement
(EIS) hecause the site is below the I.and Development Code (!.DC) 10-acre size threshold
requirement fill' a tract located landward of the coastal management boundary. The site is not
located within a Special Treatment (S'll overlay which would also have required the submittal of an
ElS.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COlJNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
l3ecause an EIS was not required and there arc no impacts to wetlands, this petition was not required
10 go to the EAt'.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The ccpe heard this petition on November 15,2007; a motion was made and seconded to liwward
petition PUDZ-2006-AR-1 0376 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval by a unanimous
vote subject to the following stipulations:
I. Exhibit A of the pun documents shall be revised to remove the word "purely" fi'OITI use #43;
and
2, Exhibit B of the PUD documents shall be revised to reflect a maximum actual building height of
50 feet; and
3. Revise Exhibit F of the PUD documents to add a stipulation addressing Transportations staff
concern as fo 110ws:
On written request by Collier County, the developer, or its successor in interest, at its sole cost,
shall promptly reduce the Radio Road access to a right-in only condition, with no claim
whatever against Collier County.
4, Revise Exhibit F of the PUD documents to add the "non-compatible use language" proposed as
a pending LDC amendment (LDC Section IO.02.03.A.5, a-d). The language to be added shall
be the language proposed as of the date of the CCPC hearing as follows:
Non-compatible uses. Jt is recognized that there are uses and accessory uses which,
because of their nature, have characteristics that do not meet the compatibility criteria of
this ordinance and thus adversely impact adjacent areas. Special regulation of these uses
is necessary to ensure that these adverse impacts will not contribute to the blighting and
downgrading of the surrounding neighborhood.
Page 4 of 8
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 5 of 153
a. Within 15 days from submittal of any site development plan, it shall be within the
discretion of the County Manager or designee to refuse approval '!fsw;h site development
plan if it includes a use that in the professional judgment of'the County Manager or
designee, is not compatible with and has the potential to cause a delelcrious effect upon an
adjacenlneighborhood.
b. NOlice of such refitsal shall be promptly mailed 10 Ihe applicant fiJI' Ihe sile
developmenl plan Applicant and slaff' will meet al their earliest convcnience to discuss
and attempl to amicably resolve Ihe compatibilily issucs, which can include, but is nol
/;mited to, moving the que,I."tioned 71.\'(' to another locathJl1 )vhhin Ihc development.
%ould Ihe parties he unable to reach an omicahle solulion Ihe mailer will he
promptly refi'rred to the ('oilier ('aunly Planning Commission AI a publicly noliced
hearing, the Planning Conll117s810n will rev;nv the proposed lfs'e make () finding as to (/)
11'hcther the proposed use lV[fS intendedfor this sUe. as set forth in the 20ning ordinance,
and (2) lvhether such u,\,c can he made compalihle with fhe {}c!ioining neighhorhood
Ihroug;h the impo,\'iliol1 (~l certain COl1tlitio!1s or restrictions, including hut not limi/ed 10
locating the use In w10lher !ocalhJl1 H-'ifhin the devc!op'J1Cnt, hutfc'ring, limiting hours c~f
operation rc(/uiring (I vesfihule, walls and reiocafing dwnpsfers.
d S'!7ould eilher the Cuunl}' or fhe applicant he unwilling 10 ahide wilh Ihefindings ol1d
rccommcndahons (!l fhe P!U!1l1illg ('onlmis,\';on, the matter ll'ill then he fOrlvarded to the
Board of County Con'lll1i,ysiol1Cr,\',j()r a public hearing, to he conducted h11he same manner
as LlJC 5-'eefion J O. Og 00, except Ihal no lice I'UljJOses 10 da}'s prior nol ice hy publicalion
will he su/ficien!.
The petitioner's agent has revised the PUD documents to incorporate all the recommendations noted
above EXCEPT item #4. The petitioner's agent testiiied at the CCPC hearing that he did not
believe putting this encumbrance upon his petitioner as this time was "appropriate and necessary,"
noting that if this LDC amendment is adopted by the BCC then his petitioner would be governed by
whatever is adopted at that time; however he did not believe it appropriate to subject this petitioner
to a preliminary form of a pending amendment that may never be adopted.
Staff does not support the inclusion of Item #4 above either, believing that to do so wouid be
premature. The actual language of the proposed amendment has not yet been detennined; thus the
final requirements of an LDC amendment could be more, or less, stringent than what is included in
this language, It seems more appropriate to make this project subject to the same review criteria as
any other project in similar circumstances so it would be more prudent to await the final rendition of
the LDC amendment and this petition would be subject to that same requirement if the LDC is
amended before an SDP is approved for the project.
The wording was inselied as a result of the ongoing controversy related to locational criteria for
bars and restaurants. In this instance, the subject site is bordered by Industrial zoning on the north
and west boundaries, and by two arterial roadways on the east and south boundaries, Across
Livingston Road to the east is the commercial portion of the Briarwood PUD which allows Cocktail
Lounges as a permitted use, Any Cocktail Lounge in that PUD would be closer to the residential
uses of Briarwood PUD than a similar use in the Lane Park CPUD and thus has the potential to have
a greater impact upon the Briarwood residents that the Lane Park CPUD might have,
Page 5 of 8
Agenda item i~o. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 6 of 153
Similarly, to the south of the Lane Park CPUD is Radio Road, which is a major east-west
thoroughfare. To the immediate south of Radio Road is a 0.7 acre tract that is zoned C-5. The site
is currently developed with a car wash, but the C-5 zoning is an intense commercial zoning district
that would allow a Drinking Establishment, fClf cxample as a use "by right" should a property owner
wish to redevelop the site. To the cast of the C-5 zoned tract is the Foxfire PUD. The most
proximate area of the Foxiire PliO is developed with the golf course maintenance facility; the
residential uses of Foxfire PUD are not adjacent to the Radio Road right-of way where Foxfire is
closest to the Lane Park CPliD. It seems that the intervcning roadways and other properties have
the potential to have more impact upon the nearby residential uses than this project might, therefore,
it seems inappropriate to single out this project regarding non-compatible uses.
LEGAL CONSIDERA nONS:
This is a site specific rezone l1'om an I Zoning District to a CPUD Zoning District I{)r a project to be
known as the Lane Park Cl'liD. Site specific rczones are quasi-judicial in naturc. As such the
burden falls upon the applicant to prove Ihat the proposed rezone is consistent with all thc criteria
set fc)rth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County COl11missioners (BCe), should if
consider denying the rezone., 1{1 determlne that such denial would not he arbitrary. discriminatory or
unreasonable. fhis would he accomplished by linding that lhe proposal does IlO! meet one or more
of the listed criteria belem.
Criteria for I)Un Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions, The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
I. Consider: The suitability of the area lor the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at
public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only afier
consultation 'with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PliO with the goals, objectives and policies of
the GMP.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions
may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development?
Page 6 of 8
I\genda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 7 of 153
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed)I~)r the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of sunounding areas to accommodate
expansIOn.
8. Consider: Confol111ity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modilications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such l11odifications are
justiticd as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application
of such regulat ions.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of1he GMP'!
10. Will the proposed PliD Rezone be appropriate considering thc existing land use pattcrn?
II. Would the requested PliO Rezone result in the possibie creation 01' an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby distric1s?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn !11 relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed !{)r change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with sUITounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public saldy?
16. Will thc proposcd change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely atfect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent
property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used 111
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...)
Page 7 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8.1\
January 15, 2008
Page 8 of 153
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs ofthe neighborhood or the county?
13. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting sueh use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential
uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the
availability oj'adequate public/tlcilities and senice-\' consistent with the levels of service
adopted in the Collier County GMP and as deilned and implemented through the Collier
County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Codc eh.106, arLlI], as amended.
26. Are there other factors. standards. or criteria relating: to the pt ID rezone request that the
Board of County Commissioners shall deem imp0l1ant ;n the protection of the public
health. salety. and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent. substantial evidence presented by the written
materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps,
studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these
items relate to these criteria. (MMSS)
RECOMMENDAnON:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUDZ-2006-AR-
10376 subject to the conditions of approval that have been incorporated in the Ordinance of
Adoption as that documcnt has been revised to reflect the CCPC recommendation, EXCEPT that
Stipulation #4 noted above in the CCPC recommendation, shall not be included in the Ordinance.
]'REPARED BY:
Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
Page 8 of 8
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 9 of 153
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SA
This Item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
ComrilisslDll members, PUDZ,-2006~AR-l0376 Radio Road Joint Venture, represented by
Michael R FernClndez of Planning Development Incorporated, is :equesiing 2 rezone from
ihe IncJustnal {II zoning district to the Commercial Pianned Unit Development I,CPUD) zoning
dist,ict for the Lane Park CrUD to aiiQl./v' develoornent 'Jf 3 i1l8>:lmum of 50000 square feet of
comme:::lai uses The ~.ut)Ject prCJfJerty consisting of :5.27 3eres, :s iocated at I:he northwest
(>:lrn~:' of RadiO n:::-,cld 211ci L,ivmgston RG3d in ~;E<tlor: ~)6, Townsilip t9 Soulr:, F\.cwge 20
E:ost, Col!;~~r COlint',', Fi.)nji;1
(10[;'; 01.' ;:-i !\[vl
Prepared B)'
~~,::~~ ~:\%"dem, A,'CP
-:i~,\inunity ~)c'I;_c'k,;J!:TK'nj &
E:nvironmentar ~~ervices
Prin~:ipai ?l;snner
Date
;:cnd'-iQ B, ~__~md U""iel',pnVo.'nt R(:\ iew
12/1712007 -:':~,(H,L: AWi
Approved By
J\!d~' ;:'c'19
C:CIll1P1unity Development &
Environmental Scrvk.es
<i-pe:;,1tic-;r C,o A\\Ol\'~st
D2te
<':;ornnHmity 0evelapment &.
Envfrcnniccntal Services A,jlTdn,
12/17'2007 '1i:D5Ji.M
Approved By
Marlene Stewart
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Executive Secretary
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
Approved By
12/17f2007 2:00 PM
Susan Murray, Ale?
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Zoning & Land Development Director
Date
Approved By
Zoning & Land Development Review
12/19:200712:33 PM
Nick Casalanguida
Transportation Services
MPO Director
Date
Transportation Planning
12/1912007 2: 29 PM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Communit.y Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
12/20/2007 8;05 PM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Services
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportation Services Admin.
12/21/20078:18 AM
file://C:\Agenda T est\Export\98-J anuary%20 15,%202008\08. %20AD V ER TI SED%20PU BLJ..,
1/9/2008
Page 2 of2
.Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 10 of 153
Approved By
Marjorie M. Student-Stiriing
Assistant County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorne)! DfFice
12/25/20076:42 PM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
Applications Analyst
Date
t.,dminfstrative Services
information ~€-::!ln()icmi
! 2,'25/20079:22 P,M
Approved By
I',"jarh Isa:::k~',o~';
3udget f;",;:d>st
:J2te
::ounty l'li2n&ger's ')ffici'
-~)ff:(:,; 'if iVi",r"gen'fml & 8UO:TPt
'~/26;:::OD; iU' '1/\M
Approved By
;;,""'1",5 fVl!lcid
"-!!'plv'\t,a'n,;'ei
'.)?1e
Board or C:cvnt}'
:::':;.mm!,,,,-siop(:,,;
":',,_,'-'"' Yi~l";;;'_~j("-;'
".'-;;<:,:0'J'7 ':0; ;:;'11i
fi le://C:\AgendaT est\Export\98-J anuary%20 I 5, %202008\08. %20ADVER TJ SED%20PUB LJ...
1/9/2008
.I\genda Item I~o. 8,1\
January 15, 2008
Page 11 of 153
Co~T County
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COliNTY PLANNING COMM1SSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 15,2007
RE:
PUDZ-2006-AR-10376: LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
-_._-~-~--_._~~-----~-~---
REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County l'lanning Commission
(CCPC) consider a rezone of the subject site from the Industrial (I) zoning district to the Commercial
Planned linit Development (CPliD) zoning district for the Lane Park CPUD.
PROJECT STATUS: The CCPC was scheduled to hear this petition on September 20, 2007;
however the petitioner's agent sought and received a continuance to allow the additional time to
response to a request to provide additional disclosure infonnation and to revise PliD Exhibit A to
clarify two uses that were unclear.
As of October 9, 2007, the petitioner's agent has not provided any additional disclosure information;
the petitioner's agent stated the petitioner has retained counsel who will address this issue at the
hearing.
lise #13 proposed "Eating places with 6,000 square feet or less in gross floor area in the principal
structure (group 58 I 2 only). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for
on-premise consumption are subject to locational requirements of the LDC" and use #3 I proposed
"Food service (eating places) uses with more than 6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the
principal structure." The confusing language has been corrected. PliD Exhibit A now shows lise
#13 as "Eating places (group 5812 only). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic
beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to locational requirements of the LDC." The
erroneous Item #3 I has been removed and the remaining items have been renumbered.
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS: The changes made in the PUD exhibit were completed to correct
ambiguities; the revisions make the proposed action more clear. Because no additional disclosure
documents have been provided, staff has no infonnation to evaluate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Zoning & Land Development Review staff continues to
recommend that the CCPC forward Petition PUDZ-2006-AR-I0376 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the stipulations that have been
Supplemental Staff Report for 11-15-07 CCPC.doc
LANE PARK CPUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-t0376
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 12 of 153
incorporated into the Ordinance and the PU 0 exhibits, finding that this petition be deemed consistent
with the GMP.
PREPARED BY:
KA Y DESELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
MARJORIE M. STUDENT-STIRLING
ASSISTANT COtJ"ITY ATTORNEY
DATE
.-- ----, -_.-~_.,.--,..,-_._..__._-- ------....
RA Y BELLOWS. ZONING \lIANACiER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING A"ID LAND DEVUOpMENT REVIEW
SUSAN M.ISTENES, AIel', D1RECTOR DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT DA TE
COMMliNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Tentatively scheduled for the December 11,2007 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
Supplemental Staff Report for 11-15-07 CCPC.doc Page 2 of 2
LANE PARK CPUD, PlJDZ-2007-AR,I0376
P,aenda Item No. 8/\
, january 15, 2008
Page 13 of 153
Co~r County
"'- ~~ ........
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE:
SEPTEMBER 20. 2007
SUBJECT:
PUDZ-2006-AR-10376: LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (CPUD)
PROPERTY APPLICANT/AGENT:
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
John A. Wanklyn
Radio Road Joint Venture
1100 5th Avenue South, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34 102
Michael R. Fernandez
Planning Development Incorporated
5 I 33 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone of the
subject site from the Industrial (I) zoning district to the Commercial Planned linit Development
(CPUD) zoning district for the Lane Park CPliD.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property, consisting of 5.27 acres, is located at the northwest corner of Radio Road (CR
856) and Livingston Road (CR 881), in Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida. (See location map on the fo 1I0wing page)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The proposed 5.21*-acre CPUD, if approved, will allow for a maximum of 50,000 square feet of
commercial development. The PUD documents allow for a mix of commercial development consistent
with the Livingston/Radio Road Commercial lnfill Subdistrict of the Collier County (GMP) Growth
Management Plan, which the subject property is totally contained within. This GMP Subdistrict listed
a number of restriction and conditions. These are being implemented with the rezoning of the subject
property as proposed. These restriction and conditions are as follows:
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10376 Staff Report
September 20, 2007 eepe
Page 1 of 7
Agenda Item No. 8/\
january 15, 2008
Page 14 of 153
I) Permitted and conditional uses are restricted to the generally permitted land uses of C-3
eommercial zoning district with four exceptions. The proposed list of permitted uses is
consistent with or more restrictive than this referenced list and is further consistent with or
more restrictive than the land uses by the current C-3 commercial district: and
2) Maximum commercial intensity is limited to 50,000 square feet; and
3) Maximum building height for commercial structures is 35 feet and up to three (3) stories;
and
4) Mixed use incorporating residential. up to an intensity of 16 units per acre, is permitted
and the height can be increased lor the mixed use structures to 45 feet within four stories.
The proposed CPUD does not seek to incorporate a rcsident ial component and therefore the
additional height and story are not applicable; and
5) Access to Livingston Road was restricted to a right-in/right-out and further restricted to
thc northern one-third of thc fi'ontage on Livingston Road; a distance of 256 tect li'om the
parcel's northern propel1y line. The CPUD Master Plan depiets a location within 200 teet
and therct{)re it is consistent with this restriction.
No deviations are heing sought as part ol'this PLiD rezoning petition.
SlJRROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North:
Market A venue. then the Collier County Production Park, a developed industrial park with a
variety of industrial uses. with an Industrial zoning designation. and a dcveloped lot within the
Collier County Production Park on the south side of Market Avenue
Livingston Road, then the Briarwood Plaza. an undeveloped commercial portion of thc
Briarwood pliD
Radio Road, then the Simply the Best Car Wash, with a C-5 zoning designation
A public utility easement and then developed lots within the Collier County Production Park,
with an Industrial zoning designation
East:
South:
West:
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10376 Staff Report
Septem ber 20, 2007 CCPC
Page 2 of 7
Agenda Item No, SA
January 15, 2008
Page 15 of 153
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE):
The subject property is designated Urban, Industrial District, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial
Infill Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land lise Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan
(GMP). The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide services, including retail uses, to surrounding
residential areas within a eonvenient travel distance to the subject property. The lirban Industrial
District permits basic industrial uses and limited commereial uses. The Livingston/Radio Road
Commercial Infill Subdistrict allows for those permitted and conditional uses set forth in the
Commercial Intermediate Zoning District (C-3). The project is consistent with the Livingston/ Radio
Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict criteria as noted in the project description.
FLUE Policy 5,4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. In
reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site the compatibility
analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to
allowed use intensities and densities, development standards such as the proposed huilding heights,
setbacks and landscape buffers, as well as the proposed building mass and building location. The
adjacent tracts are developed with industrial uses within the Industrial zoning district which limits
building hcights to a maximum of 50 Icct which is higher than what this projeet proposes. The
development envclope on the Master Plan indicates that buildings will be constructed more or less in
the middle (north to south) with the projcct's access points onto Livingston and Radio Roads. Staff
does not Icwesee any negative impacts that the proposed project would have upon the neighboring
development Therefore, staff believes the proposed development's uses will be compatible with the
neighborhood and thus the petition is consistent with GMP Policy 5,4.
In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier
County, adherence to Policies 7.1 and 7.3 is required. Policy 7.1 encourages connection to collector
and arterial roads. This project is consistent with these policies because the project is bordered by
Radio and Livingston Roads which are both classified as aJierial roads.
Policy 7.3 encourages new and existing developments to provide interconnection to other
development The project is bordered by roadways to the nOlih, east and south, thus no roadway
interconnections would be required in those directions. To the east is a 30-foot wide drainage swale
contained in an easement To the west of the easement are developed lots within the Collier County
Production Park. Based upon aerial imagery (see previous page), an interconnection does not appear
feasible because any interconnection would interfere with either existing buildings or existing parking
areas within the Collier County Production Park.
Transportation Element:
Transportation Division Planning staff has reviewed the Lane Park CPUD Traffic Impact Statement
(TIS) included in the application back-up material and the CPUD documents to ensure the CPUD
documents contain the appropriate language to address this project's potential traffic impacts, and to
offer a recommendation regarding GMP Transportation Element Policy 5.1. Those policies require the
review of all rezone requests with consideration of its impact on the overall transpOliation system, and
specifically notes that the County should not approve any request that significantly impacts a roadway
segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)
within the five-year planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved.
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ,2006-AR,10376 Staff Report
September 20,2007 CCPC
Page 3 017
Agenda Item No. SA
.January 15, 2008
Page 16of153
The project review was based on the current TIS guidelines and with respect to GMP Transportation
Element Policy 5.]. The project traffic was distributed on the adjacent roadway network and analyzed
through project build out with consideration given to the Jive-year planning period. The proposed
zoning creates a net reduction of 125 PM Peak Hour trips when compared to the existing zoning. The
trips generated by the proposed zoning will exceed 3 percent of the service volume on the Jirst
adjacent link (Radio Road ii'om Livingston Road to Airport-Pulling Road), but do not impact any
other links in the study area to a greater extent than 3 percent. fhe study shows that a potential for
turning movement failures at the intersection of Radio and Livingston Roads is possible in the 5-year
planning period when the project traffic is included. However, the applicant has committed to
providing a fair share payment towards improvements at the intersection of Radio and Livingston.
which are to be determined at the time of his Dcvclopment Order application, and shall serve as
Illltigation. Furthermore, the adjacent roadway nd\vork has adequate capacity to accommodate this
project throughout (he five-year planning period. I.ivingston Road. (I'om Radio Road to Golden Gate
Parkway. has a remaining capacity or approximately I.sn trips. and is currently at LOS "8" with no
programmed improvements. The segment of Radio Road li'om Aiqx)rt-Pulling Road to Livingston
Road has a remaining capacity of 530 trips, and is currently at UlS "D:' Adequate capacity exists fClr
the project and hackground traftie on the adjacent link!s). tberefclre the project is consistent with
Policy 5.1 ill' the GMP Transportation IJcment. J'here!clre. Ihe Transpilrtation Division Planning staff
recommends approval.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element:
Pursuant to Objective 2.4 and Polieics 2.4.1 & 6.5.1. an E:nvironmcntal Impact Statement was not
required. In accordance with Policy 6.1.1. twenty-jive perccnt of the existing native vegetation must be
retained on-site: the Master Plan indicates 0.45 acres will be provided, which is in compliance with the
requirement. No jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. In
accordance with Policy 6.2.6, required preservation areas are identified on the PliD Master Plan.
GMP Conclusion:
The Growth Management Plan is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this
proposed rezoning to CPliD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of
consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval,
approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLliE
and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the
petition is consistent with the FLliM and the FLliE as indicatcd previously in the GMP discussion.
The proposed rezone is also consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed uses and density may be deemed
consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria upon which a
favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Sections] 0.02.13 and
1 0.02.13.B.5 of the LDC and required staff evaluation and comment. The staff evaluation establishes a
factual basis to support the recommendations of staff. The Collier County Planning Commission
(Cepe) uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of County
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10376 Staff Report
September 20, 2007 eepe
Page 4 of 7
f\genda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 17 of 153
Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request
These evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff report (See
Exhibits A and B).
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document
to address any environmental concerns. This petition was not required to submit an Environment
Impact Statement (EIS) nor was a hearing before the Environmental Advisory Commission required
because the site is below the LDC 10-acre size threshold requirement for a tract located landward ofthe
coastal management boundary. The site is not located within an ST overlay which would also havc
required the submittal of an EIS.
TransDortation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document
and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. The applicant has incorporated Transportation
Division staft's revisions within the PUD document, and Transportation Division Planning staff
recommends approval subject to the Transportation commitments contained in thc PUD document
This includes a provision that the development provide payment in lieu of thc installation of sidewalks
on one side of the road as exempted in Section 2.5.C of the PUD document
UtiliN Review: This projeet is loeated within the County Sewer Servicc Area and is within the City of
Naples Water Service Area. There is existing 12 inch !()rce main in the interscction of Radio Road and
Livingston Road. The project will be subject to the conditions associated with a Sewer Availabilitv
Letter II'om the Collier County litilities Division.
Emen;encv ManafIcment: The Lane Park CPliD is located in a CAT 3 hurricane surge zone which
requires evacuation during some storm events. While there is currently no impact mitigation required
tor this, it should be noted that approval oftbis PLJD in consideration of the other development in this
area, increases the evacuation and sheltering requirements for the county however, note this is a
commercial project; there are no residential units planned for this project
Zoning Review: As illustrated in the aerial photograph located on page 2 of the staff report, the
surrounding zoning discussion of this statf report, and the Master Plan, the site is adjacent to industrial
uses west; to the north is Market A venue, then the Collier County Production Park, a developed
industrial park with a variety of industrial uses; to the east is Livingston Road; to the south is Radio
Road. The industrial zoned parcels around this subject parcel are developed with industrial uses, thus
this project should be compatible with the neighborhood. Staff has offered that finding as part of the
GMP analysis discussed previously.
The development standards contained in Exhibit A of the PliD documents reflect a design approach
that will provide a variety of commercial use oPpOliunities. Exhibit A of the PUD provides a minimum
front-yard setback of 50 feet for Livingston Road, 20 feet for Radio Road, and 200 feet for Market
A venue on lots that are a minimum of 75 feet Wide and no less than 10,000 square feet in lot area.
Buildings are proposed to not exceed 35 feet in zoned height in a maximum of three stories. Buildings
will be limited to a maximum of 50,000 square feet in gross floor area.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The agent for the applicant held the required NIM on November 15,2006 at the Naples Municipal
Airport Aviation building conference room, at 5:30 p.m. Nine people attended, including the
applicant's team and county staff. Mr. Michael Fernandez, agent for the applicant, gave a brief
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006-AR-10376 Staff Report
September 20, 2007 eepe
Page 5 of 7
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 18 of 153
overview of the proposed zoning request and development plan. An audience member asked about the
buffering requirements for the project to which Mr. Fernandez replied there will be a "Type B"
landscape buffer between the site project and residcntial devclopment. Other statements made by Mr.
Fernandez included the following limitations:
· The project will be limited to a maximum of 50.000 square feet total building footprint;
. Buildings will not exceed a height maximum of 35 feet;
· Access to project from Radio Road and Livingston Road will be limited to right in. right out;
. A 50 [(lOt setback from Livingston Road will be provided; and
· A 25 foot setback !i'om Radio Road will be provided.
Thcrc were no objections stated to either the rezone or proposed dcvclopmcnt. [Synopsis provided by
Linda 8cdtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator]
RECOMMENDA TJON:
Zoning and Land Development Rcview staff recol11mends that the Collier County Planning
Commission (CCPC) Icmvard Petition PlJDZ-2006-AR-I0376 to the Board of County Commissioners
(8CC) with a recommendation of approval of the rezoning request li'ol11 the Industrial (I) zoning
district to the Commercial Planned I. 'nil Development (CYt ID) IOning district subject to the
stipulations that have been incorporated into the RPl JD docllment.
PREPARED BY:
DATE
KA Y DESELEM, A1CP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
MARJORIE M. STliDENT-STlRLING
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
DATE
RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DATE
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006,AR-10376 Staff Report
September 20, 2007 CCPC
Page 6 of7
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15. 2008
Page 19 of 153
SUSAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DATE
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTM, SERVICES DIVISION
Tentatively scheduled i{)1' the Novemher 13,2007 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
MARK p. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
DATE
Exhibits: A. Rezone Findings
B. pUD Findings
Lane Park PUD, PUDZ-2006-AR,10376 Staff Report
September 20, 2007 CCPC
Page 7 of7
.L\qenda Item No SA
- January 15, 2'008
Page 20 of 153
Exhibit A
REZONE FINDINGS
PETITION PUDZ-2006-AR-10376
Chapter I 0.03.05.G of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners show that the
Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following,
where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, ob.iectives, and policies of
the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map and the elements ofthe
Growth Management l'lan (GMP).
Pro: County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an in-depth analysis (see staff
rep0l1) of the relevant goals. objectives and policies of the Future Land llse Element and the
Transportation L1emcnt of the (iMP olTering a recommendation that this petition be found
consistent with the overall GMP.
<:,on: None.
Findin~s: Based upon staffs review. thc proposed development is in compliance with (he
hl1urc Land Use Element (FUIE) of 1 he Cirowth Management Plan (GMP) fClf Collier County
and all other relevant goals. objectives and policies of the CiMP.
2, The existing land use pattern.
Pro: The explanation of the request in the staff report and the location and zoning map that is
attached to the staff report show the proposed development does not leave any remnant parcels
and thus the proposed rezoning can be accommodated with the existing land use pattems.
Con: The proposed retail and office land uses will bring additional vehicular trips to this area
because the site is currently undeveloped; however the TIS submitted indicates that the trips
generated by this development could be approximately equivalent to what would be allowed
with the existing Industrial zoning.
Findings: Land use patterns are influenced by several key factors such as land ownership and
the County's GMP goals and objectives. Based on the FLliE and Land Development Code
(LDC), staff has not found incompatible uses because this rezoning and the prior GMP
Amendment were tailored specifically for this area of the County for these particular land uses.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
Pro: The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Livingston/Radio Road Commercial
Infill Subdistrict
Con: None.
Findings: This petition does not create an isolated district because the subject parcel is of
sufficient size and is compatible with the adjacent and nearby industrial uses and zoning
district.
Page 1 of 5
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 21 of 153
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findings: The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 3 and 4 above.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed land use
change necessary.
Pro: The proposed change is warranted based upon the relatively recently created GMp
Livingston/Radio Road Commerciallnfill Subdistrict designation for the subject property. The
proposed rezoning brings the subject propel1y into compliance with that designation because it
would allow the uses contemplated in that subdistrict.
Con: None.
findings: The proposed Loning ehange is appropriate bascd on the existing conditions of the
property and becausc its relationship to the FLUE (Future Land Use Element of the GMp) is
positive.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
Pro: The proposed CPliD rezone will not adversely affect living conditions In thc area because
staff believes the uses proposed will be compatible with the existing land use in the
surrounding area.
Con: The proposed uses could increase the intensity of the traffic within the area; however as
noted in Item #2 above, the TIS submitted indicates that the trips generated by this
development could be approximately equivalent to what would be allowed with the existing
Industrial zoning
Findings: The County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element of
the GMp support an action to this development at this location. Also, the site will include
adequate landscaping, setbacks and buffering for the development. Furthermore, these
standards are consistent with the land uses already in the area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases ofthe development, or otherwise affect public safety.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDZ-2006-AR-l0376
Page 2 015
Agenda Item No. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 22 of 153
Pro: Development of the subject property is consistent with provisions of the Transportation
Element of the GMP, therefore, approval of this project should not create types of traffic
deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses and it should not affect the public safety.
Con: None.
Findings: Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with the
Traffic Element of the GMp and the project was found consistent. Additionally, certain
transportation improvements are included in the PliO document
8, Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
Pro: Road improvements precipitated by this development and water management
improvements to accommodate site development are designed to accommodate the normal
drainage requiremcnt and are alreadv in place for the most part.
Con: lirhan intensification iundcvelopcd vs. cleveloped) clluld potentially increase area-wide
flooding in a severe rainfall event.
Findinus: Fvery projeet approved in Collier County involving the utilization of land for some
land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all suh--surface drainage generated by
developmental activities.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to ad.iacent areas.
Pro: The proposed development standards will ensure that adequate light and air is allowed to
adjacent properties.
Con: None.
Findings: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are
unique to the zoning district in which it is located. These development standards and others
apply generally and equally to all zoning districts (i.c. open space requirement, corridor
management provisions, etc.) were designed to ensure that light penetration and circulation of
air does not adversely affect adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findings: This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may be
internal or external to the subject property, and which can affect property values. Property
valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself mayor
may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere
fact that a property is given a new zoning designation mayor may not affect value.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDZ-2006-AR-l0376
Page 3 of 5
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 23 of 153
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable,
Findings: The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land
Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development
plan approval process and/or suhdlvision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in
zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent propeliy.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applieahle.
Findings: The proposed dcvclopmcnt complies with the Growth Management Plan, a public
policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are c<insistent with said Comprehensive
Plan. In light of this fact, thc proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege.
Consistcncy with the FLUE is further determined to he a puhlic wel111re relationship because
actions consistcnt with plans are in the public interest.
13, Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
Pro: The adoption of the GMP amendment designating the subject sitc as the Livingston/Radio
Road Commercial Intill Subdistrict discourage the use of the site under the current zoning
designation.
Con: None.
Findings: The proposed action will bring the zoning into compliance with the GMP
Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Intill Subdistrict; the current zoning is not compliant with
that designation.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County;
Pro: Staff believes this development request proposes changes that are within the scale of the
needs of the neighborhood and County.
Con: None.
Findings: The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan, a policy
statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be
acceptable throughout the urban designated areas of Collier County.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDZ-2006-AR-l0376
Page 4 of5
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15 2008
Page 24 of 153
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicahle.
Findings: As noted above, this site is the subject of a specific GMP Sub-district. That Sub-
district was designed to accommodate the specific needs of that area of the County.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would
he required to make the property usa hie for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Pro: None perceived.
Con: Thc specific site under consideration in this plIn developmcnt is undeveloped at this
time.
Findings: Any development of this site would rcquire considerahle site alteration with the
proposed use of this portion of the site
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate publie faeilities and sel'Vices
consistent witb the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management
Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County LDC regarding
Adequate Public Faeilities.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findings: A multi-disciplined team responsible for reviewing jurisdictional elements of the
GMp and the LDC public facilities requirements has reviewed this land use petition and found
it consistent and in compliance for zoning approval. A final detennination whether this project
meets the full requirements of adequate public facilities specifications will be determined as
part of the development approval process.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDZ-2006-AR-l0376
Page 5 of 5
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 25 of 153
Exhibit B
PUD FINDINGS
PUDZ-2006-AR-10376
Section 1 0.02.13.B.5 of the LDC of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning
Commission to make a finding as to the pUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:
1, The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation
to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities.
Pro: The nearby area is developed or is approved for development of a compatible nature.
The petitioner will he requircd to comply with all county rcgulations regarding drainage,
sewer, water and other utilities.
Con: None.
Finding: The stipulations included in the I'UD document adequately address the impacts
from the proposed rezoning.
2, Adequacy of evidence of unified control and snitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed. particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained
at public expense.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Finding: Documents submitted with the application provided evidence of unified control.
The PliO document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance
of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and
policies ofthe Growth Management Plan (GMP).
Pro: County staff has reViewed this petition and has offered an analysis (see staffreport) of
the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP offering a recommendation that this
petition be found consistent with the overall GMP.
Con: Staffs analysis is subjective. Many of the goals, objective and policies do no have
quantative means to measure compliance. The GMP Transportation Element Policies 5.1
and 5.2 contain measurable components; however, FLUE Policy 5.4 does not.
Compatibility is more subjective.
Finding: Staff has recommended that the subject petition has been found consistent with the
goals, objectives and po licies of the GMP as provided for in the adopting ordinance. Please
see the staff report for a more detailed discussion.
Page 1 of 3
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 26 of 153
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering
and screening requirements.
Pro: The proposed development standards, landscaping and buffering requirements are
designed to make the proposed commercial uses compatible with the adjacent industrial
uses.
Con: None.
Finding: Staff analysis as contained in the staff rep0l1 indicates that this petItion is
compatible. both internally and externally. with the proposed uses and with the existing
surrounding llses.
5. The adequacy of IIsablc open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
FindinS!: ['he amount nf npen space set aside hv this project is consistent \vith the
provisions of the I.and Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both pnblic and private.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Finding: Timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements does not
appear to be a significant problem as part of the PliO rezoning process, but the project's
development must be in compliance with applicable concurrency management regulations
when development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the snbject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Pro: County Transportation Division Planning staff has determined that the proposed
rezoning is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element requirements addressing
roadway concerns.
Con: None.
Finding: I l' "ability" implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system,
potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of
roads, then the subject property has the ability to support expansion based upon the
commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements
will be addressed when development approvals are sought.
PUD FINDINGS
PUDA-2006-AR-IOI
EXHIBIT B
Page 2 of 3
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 27 of 153
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations
in the particular case, based on determination that snch modifications are justified as
meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations.
Pro/Con: Not applicable; the petitioner is not seeking any deviations.
Finding: This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which
development standards and deviations proposed for this PliO depmi from development
standards that would be required for the most similar convcntional zoning district. The
development standards in this pun are similar to those standards and thc petitioner is not
seeking any deviations as pmi of the rezoning action.
PUD FINDINGS
PUDA-2006-AR-IOl
EXHIBIT B
Page 3 of 3
<cOM
""DU)
.O~
0"'''-
Z ,0
.-::=:CO
33~.N
_,-ill
-(1j:J)
tU::;C';:
-~ ~n..
'J) --;
:7)
-c:(
,! I I ;
,__ I I \:,!
C-.- '(l/\lIiNOl!:)~~-j
, TT! ! I 1"-'--1'
[ rr-Jr 'I-LL_-i~'
~~J _--'- 1_ IL ,
I I . i' '"'''',"00
l;~-:_J~-
If;} -!
1
.
-
!
i,
lil~;
I
VL-a.LValSlNl
I I ld !
I . ! ' .
"i !
I
--
" !~ R-
i . it
I
R~.I .
iP
i
s
i
.
'"
,
~
..
~
~ "
"
8
~
~ ~
"
. 0
"
0
"
<
<
i\\'. g~L.
\ \ Cl.~ ~ ~
, '"/''' ,,~f?
h "', "-~
,\ (' ---'
, i I
o
""\ g
:5 PJ
"- ,
e
~ ,1 .-
!
,__n_
I
___i_
I !I\ 1 TT'I TT-;,'l--r:-l"
i" ,,-'- L._._. ,Ll:' I ' ,
I. 2< 1"1 IL-.-.---- n__ ~-;:FlHLS "Gl_His'J=~--nL_--! ""
~" I:;j --IL'"
___n___I____ ~-I~I \,,\
_ "1~11 ~: ~.. ~~ '~r .
, m ,OJ i '__j~~i'18
:;-r.<OS CllJ.ON / -_____
- --
II!
h
"II jll!
"
'wi tz
wQ
-I;(
00
[g
Cl.
II <(
:rE
.
j Z
" 0
-
I-
<(
0
0
...J
-====
-
"
.
"
Cl.
<(
:rE
c:>
z
z
o
N
I
""
1'_1
"'I
~!
~I
'"
'"
'"
'"
-'
CL
'"
z
o
f-
f-
UJ
CL
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(i)
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 29 of 153
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
APPLICA nON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
o PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
o PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
[ PUDZ-2006-AR-10376
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE: 8/28/06
KA Y DESF.LEM
J
[, ,
APPLICANT INFORMATION
"--~-~~~l
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) RADIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE
ADDRESS 1100 5TH AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 201 CITY NAPLES
TELEPHONE# 561-272-2134 CELL # N/A
E-MAIL ADDRESS: NIA
STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34102
FAX # 561-278-1111
NAME OF AGENT MICHAEL R. FERNANDEZ I PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED
i
ADDRESS 5133 CASTELLO DRIVE, SUITE 2 CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34103
TELEPHONE # 239-263-6934 CELL # 239-370-6557 FAX # 239-263-6981
E-MAIL ADDRESS.PDIMRF@AOL.COM
BE AWARE THAT COI.LIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6114/04
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 30 of 153
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. P,ovide additional
sheets if necessary.
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION,
OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. INC. (lNACTIVEl
COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PROPERTY
MAILING ADDRESS
1100 FIFTH AVE. S.. SUITE 2_QL- CITY. NAPLES STATE -EL ZIP 34102
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP_,_
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIATION,
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIATION,
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
c
Disclosure of Interest Information
1
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
Percentage "f Ownership
Application For Public Hearing For PlJD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No, SA
January 15, 2008
Page 31 of 153
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Addres.
Percentage of Ownership
d, If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Radio Road Joint Venture
100%
Please see attached Owner.~hip Chart
Applicfltion For Public Hearing F<Jr PUP Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 32 of 153
e, If there ;s a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Date of Contract'_
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or afficers, if a corporation, partnership, ar trust.
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired X - 6/25/87
leased 0 Term of lease
yr../mos,
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option:
Date option terminates:
Anticipated closing date
, or
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the findl public hearing,
it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behdlf, to submit
a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Applicati()J1 For Public Hearing For PUD Re1,One 6f14f04
PROPERTY LOCA TJON
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 33 of 15f
Detailed le2al description of the "roperty covered by the apJ)lication: (If space is inadequate, altach
on separate page~) If request involves change to more 'han one zoning district, include separcate legal
description for properly involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey
(completed within the last six rnonths, maximum I" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre.
application meeting,
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning
the legal description, an engineer's c::ertification ot sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range 2.6_/_4!lD 25E
lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Collier Countv Production Park
Plat Book_.._ Poge #:
Properly 1.0.#: 27165000258 'lnd 27155001500
Metes & Bounds Description: Please see attached leaal description
She of J)ro"erty:
ft. X ,___ft. = Total Sq, Ft. 229.611.97010 Acres 5.27 or
A.ldressfl!enerallocation of subiect pl'Opert'V:
Northwest corner of Radio Road and Livinl!ston
Road f 4787 Radio Road
PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): 0 Residential 0 Community Facilities
X Commmercial 0 Industrial
L
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning
land use
Collier County Production Park
Radio Road I Simply the Best Car Wash
,
Briarwood Plaza
N
S ROW/C-5
E PUO
W
Collier CounlY Production Park
Does the owner of the subject proporly own property contiguous to the subjeci properly? If so,
give complete legal description of entire contiguous properly. (If space Is inadequate, attach on
separate page). N/A
SectionfTownship /Range
I
I
lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book_ Page #:
Metes & Bounds Description:
Properly 1.0.#:
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 34 of 153
REZONE REQUEST
This application is reque.ling a rezone from the
Commercial Planned Unit Develol>ment ICPUD\
Present Use of the Properly.
Vacanl
Indu.trlal II)
zoning district(s) to the
zoning dlstrict(s).
Proposed U.e (or range of u.e.) of the property:
50.000 SQuare feel
Original PUD Name.
Commercial! Office and Retail Uses - a~proximately
Ordinance No..
J
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analy.is and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Baard of County Commi..ioner. .hall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the crileria noted
below. Include any backup malerials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Consideralions (LDC Section 10.02.13.Bl
1. The suilability of the area for the type and pattern of dev..lopment proposed in relation to
physical charac::teristic$ of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewe" water,
and other ulllili....
2. Adequacy of evidence af unified contral and suitability of any proposed agreements,. contract, ar
ather in.truments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for Ihe continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are nolto be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shatl be made only after consultation with the counly at1orn..y.
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and polieies of the growth
management plan.
4. The inlernal and ext..rnal compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
5, The adequacy of usable open space areas in exlstenc.. and as propos..d to serve the development.
6. Th.. timing Dr sequenc.. of d..veiopm..nt for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7, The ability of the subiect property and of surrounding areas to acoommodate expansion.
Application For Public Henring For PUD Re:rone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 8.6,
january 15, 2008
Page 35 of 153
8, Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on defermination that such modificotions of justified as meeting public
purposes to 0 degree alleast equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
t?ti!LRestricliono: The County Is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communltles hove adopted !iuch restrIctions. You may wish to contact the civic: or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requeste d in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land ose Detitions on the subiect propertY: To your knowledge, has. a public hearing been held
on this property within the lasl year? 0 Yes X No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing? ~_~__.
NOTICE,
This appllcation will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and
the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed"
when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary
information to continue processina or otherwise actively oursue the rezonina for a period of six (61
months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application
"closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re-
opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a
determination of usuffidency". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code.
(LDC Section 10.03.05.Q.)
Application For Public Bearing For PUD Rezone 6/l4/04
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
:J
[
No, of Copies
X 24*
X 24*
X 24*
X 24
X 24
X 24
X 2*
X 1*
X 4
X 4*
X 4
X 7
X 4
04
X 4
04
04
X I
X 1
X 24
X
SUBMITT AL SUFFICIENCY CHECKLIST
PUD REZONE or PUD TO PUD REZONE
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET
~ere If not reauired
Completed Application 0
Pre-Application Meeting Notes 0
legible Conceptual Master Plan 24" X 36" - see below 0
Conceptual Site Plan 8 11," X 11" 0
PUD Document(s) ond Master Plan 0
24" x 36" Master Plan 0
Warranty Deed or Contrael for Sale 0
Owner/Agent Affidavit, signed & notarized [J
Environmentallmpael Statement or waiver 0
Aerial Photos with Habitat Areas Identified 0
Utility Provisions Statement with Sketches 0
Traffic Impact Statement or waiver 0
Historical Surveyor waiver 0
Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structures
Boundary Survey, no more than 6 months old (24" x36")
Copies of State and/or Federal Permits
Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, if applicable
Electronic Copy of PUD Document & Plans
Copy of lelter notifying the U.S. Postal Service of project
Addressing Checklist
Required Fees - Check # 1617 - $15,623.75
'If Due additiotlal copy required iffor Affordable Housing
X
o
X
X
o
o
As the authorized ageut/applicant for this petition, I attest that aU of the information indicated on
this checldist is included in this submittal package, I understand that failure to include all
necessary snhmittal information may resnlt ill the delay of processing this petition,
~'#/7 ~ 7-28-06
Art/Applicant Signatnre ~ Date
Application For Public Hearing For PUD RC7.0ne 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 37 of 153
AFFIIJAvrt
We/I, Radio Road Jaint Venture being first duly sworn, depose and say fhat we/I am/are the
owners of the property described herein and which Is the subject matter 01 the proposed hearing; that all
the answers to the questions In this application, Including the disclosure 01 Interest information, all sketches,
data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part 01 this application, are honest and true
to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the inlormation requested on fhls
application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated
or County printed sholl not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application Is deemed
complete, and all required information has been submitted.
As property owner We/I further authorize Michael Fernandez I Plannin9 DeveloDmenl Incoroorated to
act as our/my representative in any matters regarding thi~;<l . jc_ 2 &
r-:;- N"" ;~/frXYAJ
(r>- 1,1.--.
(""'Y ' ,
114 #/1~;,r"';q
,
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
and Title
sf- ^J
was acknowledged before me this :3 t-- day of I flp.-Ych
who is personally known to me or
as Identification.
, 200k--, by
has produced
State of Ao Y\cJ6...
County of CD III L,y
,,,,!k:::1/4 ~ff;;dO,'
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
,""'-'""'~--"-'-'-"" ~".. -'.'. ~''''~--''''---'''''-;---~'.
;. ,~;Mfl&~ \
(~'I!W{y, THEf,ESA F. FERNANDEZ I
~ '?~ i MY COMMISS'OI~" OD 306048
~ ~af'il.-~ EXPIRES:.Jvns20,2{)06
(H>O:1:;-,..NorAHY A. N~lary O,m:ul.lrl! ASiloc. Ca.
'~'."'^~--""""""'--""'--~~----'--~.~-----_.-...-.-.....
,,/
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
Agenda item No. 8A
PUDZ-2006-AR.!roMlry 15, 2008
PROJECT #2006d2M~38 of 153
DATE: R128/06
KAY DESRLEM
The undersigned do hereby swear or affml1 that they are the fee simple title holders and owners
ofreeord of the propelty cmrently known as and legally dcscribcd as follows:
.-..-.-.. ----.---.
SEE ATTACHRD EXHIBlT A
The property described herein is the subject of an application for a Planned Unit Development
Rezone (PUDZ) Petition and subsequent development ordcrs Collier County. We hereby
designate Plannimr Del'elomneltt Incorporated / Michael R. Femande7.. Alep as the legal
representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all
owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop this site, This
authority ineludes but is not limited to the hiring and authorizing of agents to assist in the
preparation of applications, plans, sllrveys, and studies necessary to obtain development orders I
permits li'om Collier County, Florida Power & Light (FPL), Florida Departmcnt of
Trallsportation (FDOT), South FIOlida Water Management District (SFWMD), U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (ACOE) and/or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Sprint,
T"" W"""', C,,,,,,,,,,, TliCO, ""d >>" ".";;'2;7.;;;~
~Jlt/ ~. tN/frlIrA y"'; ,
Signature of Authorized Representative
A Radio Road Joint Venture
f' /l J.~/4~?oI1 cc,PiP I/VC .
/WA?J/!t$/.,J:;; ~?1f~ t?/M;-~oS71. .
Printed Name of Authorized Representative and Title'
STATE OF PLOKII:')A
COUN1Y OF CO (..u EfZ
~r m
SW.J:l to (or affTIed) and subscribed before me this 31-- day of Ve-ll , 2006 by
ok VI A, I ~llA/Y\ , who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification. I
~41/;JA(//1" \
SEA':L
Notary Public
My Conunission Expires:
Name typed, printed or stanlped
'-~--'_'__"h"~'h~_~"~J
.,,9.,\'P~
!tV . ~ THERESI\ F. FERNANDEZ
9~~ MYCOMMISSIONft OD306648
ItG~\I.~'I; EXPIRES: June 2.0, 2008
1.eOO.:H,'OlAHY Fl Not'lTy D~COvn1.AS!OC, Co.
· Documentatiori"ofauthorEition to Sign on behalf of ownership entity attached
"
"
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 39 of 153
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 27, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 1B, as recorded in
Plat Book 15, Pages 7 and 8 ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
and
Tract A, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 3A, as recorded in
Plat Book 22, Pages 59 and 60 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 40 of 153
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
TIle undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titlebolders artd owners of record of property
commonly known as the l...ane Park Ct>UD
and legally described in Exhibit A a((ached bereto.
Tbe property described herein is the subject of an application for commercial ptanned unit development U]tJD)
zoning. Vle bereby designate Michael Fernandez I Planning Develoument IlIcornorated. legal representative
tbereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are autlJorized to legally bind all
owuers of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is
not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to a~~i,<.:t in the preparation of applications. plans, surveys, and
studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives \vill remain the only entity to
authorize development activity on the property until such time as a l1ew or amended covenant of unjfied con1J'ol is
delivered to Collier COUlJ1y.
The lludersigued recognize the following ana will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the
project:
1, The property will be developed and used in confonnity ,:vitb the approved master plan including all conditions
placed on the development and all cOlllmitmentt: agn,cu LO by the applicant in connection with the planned unit
development rezoning,
2. Tbe legal rt:presentative identified herein is responsible for compliance with aU temls) conditions, snfeguards,
EUld slipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in
whole or in pmt, unless and llntil H new or amended covenant of unified control i~ delivered 1.0 and recordr.d by
Collier Connty.
3, A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failmc t.o comply with any requirements; conditions,
or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will Gonstitute a violation of the Land
Development Code.
4, All tcrms and conditions of -the planned tlllit development approval will be incOIporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land 80 as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity
within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms aIld conditions,
5, So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms,
safeguards. and conditions. of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel
compliance. The County will not issue pcnnits. certificatc~, or licenses to occupy 01' use any part of the
planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought
into c I ce with allr+1l1S. e lions and safeguards of the planned unit development.
. .
Radio
John A. Wanklvn
Printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subsc1ibed before me this
~j5: day of ~,200b.bY
_~Vir\ "'", vJa.l\.\d~
____ .__ who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification,
~~
Notary Public
'" - -~-
.........'~~..-.....~----..----~
_}\\y ~u~
~':vffl""
<;.,.~
"'1f')f\\.Q,<if'
1-6G:.).S-NOTAFtY
THERESA F. FERNANDEZ
MY COMlIim;S10N I; OlJ 30664B
EXPlRES~ .June 20, 2008
fLN(lI:;ryDisCCl.!rr.~oc_CO.
- -
(Name typed, printed or stamped)
.,...-...."-..,--.....--.._.~---_.-..---.....--....,~~-_.
(Serial Number, if any) PUDZ-2006-AR-10376
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE: 8/28/06
KAY DESELEM
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 41 of 153
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 27, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 1 S, as recorded in
Plat Book 15, Pages 7 and 8 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
and
Tract A, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 3A, as recorded in
Pial Book 22, Pages 59 and 60 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 42 of 153
SWORN STATEMENT
I, Michael R, Fernandez. President ,of Plann!n!! Development blcomorated ,
authorized representative of Radio Road Joint Venture ,owner of the property described herein
and the project known as the Lane Park CPUD
, first being duly sworn, depose and say that
sufficient information has becn provided to the surveyor to allow the accurate dcpiction of all data
required to bc shown on the signed and sealed boundary survey that is included in this petition
submittal. Further, all information supplied is dcemed to be honcst and true to thc bORt of our
knowledge and bdief
.. ~--/22~,----
~t~;c
Michael R. Fcrt'k'llldez
Authorized Represcntative for
Radio Road Joint V cnture ·
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ,')., 'J, day of , 2006 by
Michael R. Fernandez , who is personally Imowu to me or who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
SEAL
,,'I~:I~~. SUSAN M. FARIZ
("':0<1 ~. (~\ Notary Public _ StBt& of Fbrida
. : : . jMy Commls9Jon !:xpires Mar 23,2010
<~, ""ifl Commission ~ DO 532495
'#1',~f,r,\"" Bontlea By National Nolary Ann.
.~~ l-vL 1tuc1'i;
SIGNATURE OF NOTAR#UBLIC
My commission expires:
· See attached Letter of Authorization
I'UDZ-2006-AR-I0376
PRO.1ECT #200G020051
D ATE: 8/28106
KA Y PESELEM
. ,
,.
<roC"")
000'"
,:....c):
'~
o
(')
:: 'i"
--:1) ;;'-'(1)
=roVi
.S2~~
',J o-Il..
=ro
OJ-'
::JJ
<J:.
f-<
~
:=
u
Po< :::0::
........::11
:=~..:
<IJ ""
~ i<l
~ j
o
'"
~
U
!:l
;;;>
>><
U
~
~ "
~ ~
-0
'0 u
U ...
... ..: ~
COo ("'J~
- ~ ~
" "0 %I 8
~ 0 1I d)
f~ Q.j~
.>f~ .>f~
~ ;.::l :;j .0
",;~ g~
.g!,j 'U ;9
f,J 7:1 ::s tI-t
~~ '00
~O""dOO
\-j (lO = p':: l"O
~"'OoCd "'0
;''':1 a;a
tl" S
::>,... '"
8~ '"
" '"
... ~ Ii! "
"", s gj'
:l , ~ '"
8 ~ r.;~"
",'-1!l <If.,,;
Ndl ,,0
Q ;l~
>-I] ~~
"" ii1
.S '"
'0 .~
" '0
"8 .g
8 ...
" 8
... "
\1 ~
>:'d
'"
=
15
u
~:a
~ 5
~~
Eo< ..
~""
0'2
..., l!
~r)
0"
~=!
o~
~':
llLLl'll7.lrlQ
<l
.a
~
~
'Q
e
"
.5
~
"
::l! Cl
.. 0
0'.::1
...",...,
11 sYJ
~ ""!l
t: ~ Q
~w;
~:-9 e..c
~~~
~ '"
fa
~
.-!
.a
~
g'i'
.~ e
i ~,~
. 8 ~
"" '"
tJ~~
u ~
"il
A
..
,J ~
" ..
~t:l~
.00
~ ";::I 0
",,-
.. ~ ~
...1 0 lJ
~ i~
~. ..-"l
~",,"
!l'gl
'a Ii: '"
:s~~
;s '"
1! r:
~w OJ
:?>
'0
~~'O'
{J"'~
",,~g
... ",,-
~~'il
\l;l,,'"
!l~]
's.!! ~
~,!l-=
" .a, '"
"'''~
"" ... 0
t: ~'"
i~
~ 0
~ ~
'"
"
]~
'::\
5'"
~;a'O'
a-"CI~
tii~
~~ ii
.5.!l ~
~~i
"iJ~j
is '6!, '"
t: " "
.8~-O
~ ~'"
.!:l @'
[/J 8
'"
~
"
OJ
:?>
'0
Iii,...,
'd'O~
:liiig
';1 ]>c
.!:i ti:l ~
...1,.9 ~
. "'.<:l
" "
~ll
~ .~O?
Zloo(~
~,g
~
o
"
..
U^I~UeM 'if Uuor
~
.0
~ ,-.
"" \;;\
A 1)!~
~ a~
1", 1-'."1
~ ;i ~ ~
" 41",
.El 0 N
'" -
;;: .~
"
::F.
~
f-<
C10Iil
l~
u "0 ~
Slljl;<iJ
~~j~
cu~..d,.;;j
. ~ '" c
.::1 ".;::! ~
'" '1: \0
~\;\(:Q<'1
::l!~ ~
;; ..
.
p
....
'D'"
r-'"
",'"
",g
-:g ~
cGQ'-O~
<N:;:~
",""00""
",,..t!</l
oUoo~
~\ ~ ..,~
N""o;t
00"'''';2
;;J"~
~~Q
8\70:LL >)() LL 6nv
'.
This Instrument Prepared by:
Timothy G. Hains, Esquire
QUARLES & BRADY LLP
1395 Panther Lane, #300
Naples, Florida 34109
$ 10,00 recording fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 44 of 153
AFFIDAVIT REGARDING PARTNERSHIP
STATE OF FLO'RIDA
COUNTY O'F CO'LLJER
BEFORE ME the undersigned authority personally appeared John A. Wanklyn, who, being
first duly sworn, deposes and says:
I . That he is a general partner of RADIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE, a Florida General
Partnership.
2. That all of the partners of RADIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE, a Florida General
Partnership, and their partnership interests are as follows:
CCPP, lnc" a Delaware corporation
John A, Wanklyn, Trustee
99%
1%
3. That RADIO' RO'AD JO'JNT VENTURE was duly formed and is currently in existence
under Florida law.
4. That anyone partner has full power and authority to execute deeds, affidavits, deed
restrictions, and any and all other instruments dealing with real property or otherwise acting on
behalf of the Partnership.
5. Neither the Partnership nor any of the partners have been debtors in a bankruptcy
proceeding during the existence of this Partnership,
6. The corporate general partner has not been diSS~Olved.
"'rtha.Affi""",,,,,,",,, ~.d-1-
Jo A. Wanklyn
The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed to before me this ~ day of
-t\qi!)t~, 2006, by John A, Wanklyn, He is personally known to me and did take an oath,
~/l~~
Notary Public
Print Name: -1A U'~ r: F .LYII ~ c:.
My Commission Expires:
(SEAL)
r- ~;~r~;';---'-"-~'--" ., -~-------'----~--.
f. '~Wi;'" THERESA F. FERNANDEZ I
. ~ ~.w MV COMMISSION '/I nD 3066l1E
( ~l or i\~'l.. EXPHII:S: .lun~J 20, ~GaB
.. 1.OC':':::i.~!CTAi1Y FL N')l~)Y Oi.!.ct.)\J>;\ A<;l!oc, Ca.
...,..........~,4,_......" '_..">-"._.,.,..-.._".,..... ._".--_'...-.........~
QBNAP\498978.1
Agenda Item No. 8A
~~~08
~'~7153
COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION
3301 Ea>t TomIami 1\'alI . N."lts. Florida 34112 . (239) 132-2$75 . Fa>c (239) 71!2-252~
May 23, 2006
PUDZ.2006-AR-10376
PROJECT #2006020051
DA TE: 8/28/06
KAY DESELEM
Ms. Susan M, Fariz
Project Coordinator
Planning Development Incorporated
5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, FL 34103
Subject:
Northwest Comer of Livingslon Road and Radio Road
Sewer Availability
Dear Ms. Fal'iz:
Sewer service is available for the above referenced project via existing lines along Radio Road to
the east of the subject property provided you extend the lines to the subject property.
If this project is not to provide the required Collier County Utility Easements (CUEs), all sewer
facilities shall be owned and maintained by the owner, his successors or assigns, If this project is
to provide the required CUEs, all sewer facilities shall be owned and maintained by Collier
County Public Utilities,
Water in this area is served by the CityofNaples, and you need to contact them for availability,
They can be reached at (239) 213-5015.
Tie-in to sewer lines shall be made after submission and approval of the hydraulic calculations
by Engineering Review Services, showing that the downstream systems are adequate to handle
the increase in flow.
The District will be making phased expansions to the sewage transmission, treatment and
disposal facilities servicing the area in question and other arcas of the County, based on
demands within the system and other binding commitments. These expansions should provide
sufficient capacity to supply the referenced property's anticipated sewage treatment and
disposal demands and tbe remainder of the District's committed capacity. However, no guarantee
can be issued that other developments throughout the District will not impact on the quantity of
sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until each phase has received a
commitment for service.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 46 of 153
Ms, Susan M. Fariz
May 23, 2006
Page 2
Connections are also subject to the availability of water and sewcr capacity at the time formal
application is received. Should water supply or sewage treatment and disposal capacity not be
availahle, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means of water supply and
treatment and sewage treatmcnt and disposal until the District's facilities have the adcquate
capacity to serve the project.
Please note that any and all improvements that you construct must be in accordance with all
applicable ordinances and policies, including the payment of impact fees.
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (239) 732-2575,
Best regards,
{L_ CZT
Amia Curry
Engineering Technician
cc: Diane Dcoss, Utility Billing & Customer Service
Heather Sweet, Utility Billing & Customer Service
WeS Hill, Engineering Review Services
G:fEngineerlng Tt(:hfAvul.b;lil)'{AVl!i!ll~lIhy Lener
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 47 of 153
. APPLICANT INFORMATioN)
NAME OF APPlICANT(S} RADIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE
ADDRESS 1100 5TH A VENUE SOUTH. SUITE 201 CITY NAPLES
TELEPHONE # 561-272-2134 CHL# NfA
E-MAIL ADDRESS: NIA
STATE Fl
ZIP 34102
FAX # 239-263-6981
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): 4787 Radio Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'l
Section/Township/Range 36
/ 49S
. / 25E
Lot,
Plat 800k
Block:
Subdivisio",__
Collier County Production Park
Page #,___, Property 1.0.#, 27165000258 and 27155001500
Metes & Bounds Description:
Sea attached leaal descri"tion
I TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED' .
(Check applicable system):
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPD capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM
18l
o
o
o
o
I
TYPE OF Wjl.l"ER. SER.VICE TO. BE PRO\(IDED
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
o
18l
o
o
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
, 'Sl A lEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 48 of 153
TOT At POPULATION TO BE SERVED:
17,000 sf office + 33,000 sf retail == 50,000 sf
total commercial
PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A, WATER-PEAK 10,154 apd AVERAGE DAILY
B. SEWER-PEAK 10,154 apd AVERAGE DAILY
· See attached calculations
5,850 aDd
5,8509Pd
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED____,_~_____
NARRATIVE STATEMENT, Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percoiation ponds are to be used, then percoiatlon
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the proiect Is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage
collection facilities within the proiect area upon completion of the construction of these facilities
in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time, This statement
shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and
connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building
permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to
dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems,
STATEMENT Of A\fAILABI,LrT'( CAPACITY FROM OTHE~ PROVIDER$: Unless waived or
otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the proieet is to receive Sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided,
Application For Public Hearing For PUP Re7.Qne 6/14/04
Lane Park CPUD
Agenda ttem No. SA
January 15, 2008
Date Prepared: 08/24/200if'age 49 of 153
Antlcloated Water Demand
Anticipated Average Water demand
Estimated sewage flow based on occupancy based
Florida Administrative Code Chapter 64E - 6 Table 1
Assume: 17,000
33,000
Office Building
Retail
15
0.1
Gallons par 100 square feet=
Gallons per square foot=
2,550 '
3,300
gallons per day
50,000
Square feet
Anticipated Sewage flow = ~Tht':!li.~IiQ~t." gallons per day
Anticipated Maximum Water demand
Based on Great Lakes, Upper Mississippi River Board 1978 Standards Figure 1
Therefore:
p = Population in thousands = 50 00
Peak Factor = (18+(pHO.5))/(4+(pHO.5))
Therefore:
Poak Factor :::
Anticipated Maximum Water demand:::: 10,154
423
= 7
Gallons per day
Gallons per hour
Gallons per minute
Total Maximum Water Demand - 857 Gallons per minute
\~'!!.~~ Gallons per ur
1;
''l'''I~I\''H..,\",
I~~ ,'~ "'. .
j" .,,,~'{t-& '<'.
,,-" (,L~)I> "",{>,,~l);l"",, '.,-
/if{~ i:;' ,: ,
.. ..-;(. ( Ql~ .,-'>
'"' "~~,, l,., 't .;.-.
Anticipated Fire Flow - 850 Gallons per minute
N.F.PA 135
", '. mith,.p.E,: _:,' ,,:,
'0;, Fr6riq~ Re~isfratio~5419ii
"J.":*,:' "~..",,, ~c-c.:J ....'
.,~. . ,', i""W\-,,;,J /
'J'~',l' '. ~Htt .
'..::. jt n~I~~' r. ,~t~:,
Planning Development lnc.
Page 1
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
PUDZ-2006-AR-l0376 Page 50 of 153
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE: 8/28/06
KA Y DESELEM
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Sue M. Cobb
Secretary of State
DNISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Ms. Susan M, Fariz
Plmming Development Incorporated
5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, Florida 34J03
May 31, 2006
Re: DHR No.: 2006-4129
Received by DHR: May 10, 2006
Commercial PUD
POI PN: 05.01044
Collier County
Dear Ms. Fariz:
In accordance with the procedures contained in the applicable local ordinance or land
development code, we reviewed the referenced project for possible impact to cultural resources
(any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for
listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, archaeological, or
architectural value.
Based on the infonnation'provided, it is the opinion of this office that no historic properties are
likely to be affected by the proposed undertaking.
If there are any questions concerning our comments or recommendations, please contact April
Westelman, Historic Sites Specialist, by phone at (850) 245-6333, or by electronic mail at
amwestem1an(a),dos.state.fl.us. We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's
historic properties.
Sincerely,
~n' .Q ? G.J..
Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and
State Historic Preservation Officer
500 S. Bronough Street . Tall~h.ssee, FL 32399-0250 . http://www.flheritage.com
Cl Director's Office
(B50) 245,6300' FAX: 245,6436
o Archaeological Re5carch.
(850) 245.6444 . FAX: 245,6452
!KI Historic Preservation
(850) 245,63~~ . FAX, 245",437
o Historical Museums
(B50) 245,6400 . FAX: 245,6433
o Southeast Regional Office 0 Northeast Regional Office
(954) 467-4990' FAX: '67-4991 (904) 825.5{J45' FAX: 825.5044
o Central F.Iorida Regional Office
(813) 272-3843' FAX: 272-2340
, .
- .n
Agenda Item No. 8A
~ ~'.'.' Janu , 2008
Pag of 153
000118'.
PAGE
"!i;"'<""" .
.;~ 'o_._"'{tt. .
J."" If;'~
, .-to
;,!If
oiII
:1
I~
I
_i
-
V>
_ II:
c.o~
....a
rru
OR 8O/JIC
'fIt1. i...-~ _pared Ilr
.... ...... ~.
Tl~ G. ..lnl, ....lre
A11llan, 0.10-1 OOpla , PI,*",,"", ...A. "1:
Jl'" Red 1'<1. ..I ft.U ....M~. : .., .. --I.D..
Illlpl.., ,lOE'lda ""1 .<":..... J -....
11l3)n",:ao.. h. .Ji __
nlG., '\ tnc","
l'llM
OOC
INT :JJ5Q:
~
>~. ~ J .; I
e
TlIIS IIIPEll1'tlllI IS IIAOJt tll. 13t~ de)' or AVllv.t , 1992,
bet....n "^'1'lOllSIIAIIK TRUST CO!/PAHY or FLORIOl\, 11.1.., fOOlorly
ClITIZIIIIB I\IlO 8OU'l'II1lRII'l'JlU/IT eoMPMlY (l'tORIor.), lI11/nOlll\" IlSBOCIII'l'rOlI
anc! tul'tber to...l'1Y TJIJ IIATIOIII\L TIlUlI1' COJIPI\llY, 1Il1I'I.ES, FLOllIO....
all ""ly author he to a....pt Ind .1lOcute trult. "ltllln tile state
of Florida, a8 Tru.t.. under t.he p~oYl.1on. of tha't oartaln truet
.9r....nt lilted oot.ober 23. 1980, Ind known .... .,......t. 110. 5181,
or.ntor, Ind RAOIO ROllO JOIHT _, a Y1orido lJenorll
Pll'tner.llip, of SUO 1I0rth Fed.ral Hl9hvay, llO<la R.ton, Floridl
33431, Gt:'antae,
BACKGROUND
A. BY Trustee'. Dud dlted JUIllt 25, 1987, and rACorded It
offieid ""cord.e Bool< 1278. pall. 1207 - 1211. Inclu.IV., Publia
'RaoorCi. of collier Coun~y, Grantor oonv8yeit to Grantee
certain rell property In ~ 'lorllla.
N
B. '!'be first description "ge 1210 of Official
Roooords Book 1278, (I tlllrd 1'"9" f lblt: A ot thlt d_
and un't:1t.led -Ea. r a 1"8511 (reviSed) H],
contained a sa.lv. did not: at"ly lIesoribe the
plrcal of r.al pr " ad to d.lICribe. rt
was the intent ot . a 1 should be that real
property whlcb ..... " p:< natruaent enti t1ell
Ea88..n~, dated Jen in Official Records
Book 1174, Page 135 ~ :::;
:,.. 0
C. In order lption, the Crantor
e~eoutea this in_ scrivener's error, to
Icltnov1edIl" th" Inblnt 0 to convey to the Grsnt...
any rl9htlJ that it: ",ay to tll" parcel that WI.
erroneously d.B~~ibed.
WITNESS1!:'TM:
THAT the Slid Grenter, in conolderotion at tll" sllJll of ~.n
Dollars ($lO.OO} and other 900d and valuabl..e cons.iderat.ion in hand
paid, does hereby qrant, release, 8ell and convey unto Grantee. tbe
real property in Collier County. l'lorilla described on the Ittaclled
Exhibit 1\,
TOQm'HEJl WITH the teneWlnts, appurtenances theret.o belonging-.
1'0 HAVE AND '1'0 HOLD: the S8111.e un'to the Grantee.. and to the
property use I bene.f it. and behoof foraver of Grantee.
G~R covenants and ~arrants that the property is free of
all encuabranc8s made by Grant.or f except that this Deed Is subject
to the tollowin~:.
1. conditions, restrictions, limitations and e8s~ants of
record, if any, but this pX'ovi15lion shall not .operate to
reimpose the same.
2. Zoning anti otber governmental regulations effecting the
use and occupancy of the real property ~
PUDZ-2006-AR-10376
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE: 8128106
KAY DESELEM
.'
.,u
OR 80DK
00..,.
PAGE
Agenda Ilem No. SA
~ an ar 15,2008
of 153
.~."j,..
".. T.... aftd ....._nu tOE' 19." and 811b.eqv.nt ,...,...
4. 1.1... or .wrry truft d_ or ....~ llr ..., tM"-l ar
recol"d 1" .al<1 county 91- to 8,"",," "M paya.nt or
110...,.. 8M reaei..i"" u.....l.._ .t tM date or tllG
dellV.ry tb......r.
111 NI'1lI1lIl8 NIl_r. the or""tor h.. 0...."" Ita corporau ....1
to eru.... ..... h.. __ ita na.. to be .1",*, to the_ ......ont.
by lu dilly alltborb"" orr1...r. tha dey aM )'0181:' r1n1: alH>vo
wrltten.
819_. ....18<1 and <Sallv.r..s
in the pre..nee I
NATIOllIIlllIIIC TRUllT COIII'AII'" OF
FLORIDA, N. A., former ly
CITlZIlf8 A"D 80UTHBRN TRUST
COIIPAIIY (I'I.ORItlAl. lIA'I'1011AL
ASIOCrATIO" and furt.hu
fo....rly THB NATIONAL TRUST
OOIIPAIIf. 1IJIPLl':1. FLORIDA. o.
'l'.....ue under t.ha providon. ot
tllat _in t.....t. ao;rrB_nt.
elated oct.oNr 23, 1990, anct
known a. TrU.t No. 5181,
.....
"t..,
".
"
f-.
STATE OF FLORIDA $ '. ~:',.' .'
COtmTY 01' COLLIER (9. :' .... ...:,.
The far",oin\! inB ad befora .. this ai.zl.!.
clay of Ao..uT . 1 ,S I . . 'as
.JII,';' _e~, et.,-r COIIP 01"
FLORXDA, N.A. . ranarly CJ'I'IZEIIS AlII) IlOII'l'IIBRN TRUIlT COI'IPANY
(I'LOJlIIlA). JIA'1'IONAL ABSOCIJI.TJOIl and f1lrthBr f01'll>Srly THB NATIONAL
'rIlUST COIIPAlI1',' IIAPLIlS, FLORIDA. as 'l'ruatM undBr the provi.iona of
that. certain trullt aqr......nt c:latBd OC>tobllr 23. 1980. and known 06
TrUst Ng,. 5181, on babalf of the corporation. Ha/Sb8. i. personally
known to pe or ha. produced .~ L IlIIIiI
identificat.ion, ond did not t.
My cam.i..ion BXp1res~
NOTM'tP'UilllC,Sif.TlOF flf);,:t.,l"
MY tOM"I~Sll,)tl E:l.pltoL~ 0<.:.1,'"" BU.
....H~a ,""... ""'M" ~.....,,~ ..."..~~...-'.,'~,...
'.,
.......-
11"
OROOOK
Agenda Item No. 8A
. January-iS, 2008
000680 Page 53 of 153
PAGE
UH::art ..I.....
~t J""----"'"
. ,;, '
. . " '. t. _" ..." ,....... ......."10..... .11;'~ 'f, ......~
',... '.. '0.. ....'" .... ../. '. 'fif">f.~.iIi._,.rr-r,......~'1'1...... #"..~ .,~ -
,'I.., ...... ". "._".':"" ,~..,,' ':.....:_.~1/....J.A..'!Il"j;.,..{... "''''''':.'''~'')!''*''''I'
~."'. .'. ... .......;.. . ')'I~~""':'V'"""".,,,,,.~r ,..---.,....'...1.......-1!,....~ If
"..'~," \ ~;,..... ".i. ',.,':.. .. ....../.... .... "'r-'!I.r:, ,'.rJl!'""",~,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,...~.,
u~ ':'t of.. . ." '".... .. '" ...._.. 'Il' jIt "J "-ift~...t--- .~...:.. .... ~
...,;.:-~' . ',' ,....:, '.~ -'" ...... :',.. .:., .'.:..........:a;;:;...:i....C.,...,~~..?~...:l~)I': .~..{..~.
J...:.~::.. ..... .......~ '&A$F..'UBT JOIIINCJtISSAND tC:RI:Sf.~~,'!.~~~.;J.w...:;.-.:.;..f'1".:[j...'..!,.-t:..~~
,', .- ........ . '. ',,'. -." . ~. (lo,i:.;o'~.tllP.Al.'~::S' .X .. >.. I
;;!::~~~~,.::~'r":::~.~...F.-.:..'J.. -;'.' ~~:~~~:iLRf:Vnl"~. J ~;;.:I;;i!:,.~..,.~~i:-~~~...~~~~~~.:t; ~"t:.': ~', -r.'
:~~ ......nt '~I' i'a~~*Ji arid ..Ct1r...... g,!&~' 'ood lJ"cr~.;.1 ~r( .Of;"I:"':lo.;~"'~t .~. :"::l-..~ rl: ~j. ....~.. ~
.......qu.re.t DI.,.eeton 36, ,Tovn..htp 4!..SCl\lth,' Rani....:' ta.t~Fol~hr.Cnncf,~',l.,d~.." :ii'l.. '.;.'....t.
;:.....~.. .... 'po'rUouhrly d".~Il..!t,."I!: .1.~I"'.I(.t'=,}:rt ~":"I'~""~~ll':'t"',f".t#,,/~~"{:(,"; ..~. ;:"';;
.1J;~" "_.~. .~...... "''''....1;.....1...0.,.1.. J"'t':,',\. ~Y:" ';,,'. '''I'~ _.........~.;...j;'.i~~ ~~~ ..MA~t~1i'...f....... '?'l. 'r.'!' ',t \.'
1!..... "P'_ ...,. ...11 .......H.... ',.~.. ~""'.....,.....,v,~ ~"." 'r"~ ............. "j: . '~~~.,.,1..!t'. ..~'J,..'. .... I
:::......; ;.-:_.01..... .hl ....h.~~.r..r .t ,S.~U,...'.6,:T~.M' '.J~.~..~. "":i'l.::, ;',
.;I'Jla....COIU.r C.IlII.,. TI.dd" .h.... aI.PI .... 1o..-V...'_;.Mi.....~iOll '1&""~''''''.J' :'
. -;1 It.. ;Z~~. OZ.," $90.54..'...., ,.Itolli:. . .00'.10::, 2anl;6J8.~~f.or.:co~;u.t:'6iF;\I( ';';.~~'.~i;i:< 'i
.lP::aa::lianou 'of. tho ..........I.".r~G'd..rrlbod"..h.,;.. ......loU.' "~~'~I~,\Joll.911;,.;;;.., "1
.~.lt..i to ehe -Ilortf" d"ht'.:of~., '!In,ol co...NrC:l.1-iJOV.l.v.sd ...~~.~'.t. recDrdeCt .,1."~' -~
::.plac. of, ~Col~14!r .Cot.nf1. hoduct:i.oa'.'f,~k 'P~I' 'LAt;:'.. 'r'~.~~""'i4~1.!:~~'f09~:t3~ :"pa..,..i.;:;:.~'~ I"
,'~.s.s...1Id 56, PubU4 aeeord. ot':Collht County, ~ florida. tb.JIIc;e'.aJP:D~~i.....otll:l~~1tb.t-, ~2~"} 'r.l
.:(.~j'-v.., ltD' pf' "1d..c-e~cl.l'!oubv.. .. %". iii, .~..~ :t..i :t~ 'C":~l't""'.>o4I" V;:.::',:~'! .
.........en cornn of ..1d Callhr Cowl)'" ',14t1Jtno...:( "-'11' ,.)4~f1t 'i.;~,."'1~"
'~',! "'.48 'teer:; 'ch.ni"_ jl 00.' OS' paw t..cj c ,:-;J.~':;t4';t..*~72'~'8 fe~t ~ '~.'~.:. :
:,..1:0 ~h.. tot"l or atCnNU~C>. .,. .,:'. Q ". ....".... ':'. ;~. ~.....r.;{. ~~ . .- ,.~~~.fr_~~,'....<1!t!"II'~. ..':':,'
.... " .......:..,....:':t... ;" '..'."~'t" .:.. ~~.....;.~'):.::~.~..........:1.:.. .lJ.',..~,J~. :!. .:~..;;."'c"'~~'; :-;ir"T-"-.';:
:.J..,.... .'''. j' . .t~. ..... ~ .. .'1....... ..!',. .ct...., ....:, ~. I" '. . ~"..Il4"':.;..."tr ."'r;""~-."
... '".~' .~. ,..f"'J~'- -;:.: ...: ,~., . ...,.......~ .::.~. ..,.. . "/."~_ ;~!"\. "'~"!":""'.,"r
.....:...::..'.:.~ :;:t.......:...~,.._:.l,. .-1~....'.:4. ':.1~v>~... :"j' ,,.:.... . ., ..~., "r.v:;".A..,!'~(_':.l. 'Jl,(l'r:.T("'...
',{,."I.' ,/"':'.I'~' '.i"..4,.:.i. "'~; . '. ._.:'~j..ft~~r:;;r~"t'1.. ,
,"',,~ ~VEIU.. tNc. \: ;..,t::: w .:..r . :.). .. . . '. ~t-.' ".PLa ,,:';~\I!I!r '~" "
'.PC'CJf..doaal'l.4DdSul'vt)'or.....~'. ~'~.' :..' ter .o{',U; a';.~ ;S:..~r'$-\~.~~':..rlt~,.~
. .t.,,I; . '1.~. .., ",. . ., .. .... ^~. ~"'i.,. ~,..r"'..'" ~.i/.or-,~) ,...1'........,
:"":' ............'.;. ...:.~.;.JP... .-:...~I.."-l" .' ,:., . '. .t' .-.l..",....~ Li.\(;::.(\t..... ..-~
,".,,;' .,;.; ,.;:..:~~!.;:.::. ;...... ;..:~ ..:~,.., ,~. /.. ".'~;:('DA'TE: '. ~'l"",...t1'" ::~'.-'I"} .;'.
.~ .,,~ ..t. . '.'~"._ 1"'" \"'-. ....0;- _" ..~, ..., "Ill...r..
.::~ t-;'..J ...~,~.;...' t..~..~.;.;..~~,.:.:....~ :"X...:j,:"fI.~ ... :~:':"\;:~'::"~:l-~~?:" \'~~f,:"{.tr~~;"-+':;;:'ii:J :~';";'if~;:~': ';
,.' '..- ..I.., .... l "., . .'\....."'.~4 ~ ...... . ",,'. ,.. 4 ''Y.....r. .. .f;!.. "oIl:...1 \...0&./ 10.... .
,Ro:rtl B..rrni".1J..~ci 'i.'Q".I"l;.arin ~ .. '8t. 21' 02tt" t' JlDreh ~ii.;;. oC'i:hI 19;~)~":{:'~ ~
,~.~,:l7,'~:SDUth..,.t quart.r' c'f ~..~r;1~A 'P hI' bn.. 2.5 E.~t..,. C4U:l~~;>:':'~;'~l;l :.;'
.~' .' Councy, Florida. ~." ',_'l~... . ,..\10\-.' .. "fJ ..,' 'rt1't)j" ,:'\::" ~:'lo"'l"','~t\-!- ~':...b; ''':'l''f':~:.: \.
. . .. ....., . '. '. ......... '.. '. ..... '. -,t. .~";t.'. ....:.. '.;, ~.' '"";.(. /0-:' ~:::; .' rO\ ;'1 I ~ :~.~.~' ~:: :~,.;.!:",.. h... . \ .....".."".~:.....~...: ','.
..:----... ....:......... ... -.:.-" ". . ......' , '. . '" ..!-.I-'l.....
,
L
..,.
. . - ";~l' tr..".......:...;.......M..-::Ol. .... '::;'" ~.'~'.lo. ~,.r.........!.r. ..-..
.., ,
. , .
:. :,:,.: ,.J"_,,:,,,~~':"';J :.....,~.\ .p;;'(.i!.~.-~...~)~;~~:";;:1't1iJ(f...,,~~\eo\' f:..;...~~~.~f#..(~..\ ::"h~
,'.
. . . ...... ....~~...~rt:t~:.~
~~~t:'~.......;.~':"'...p.-.o.;~\I,y.~~~~:r ','
'. .' ... ~.M"""
lI'I......\~fJf
COttiER COlllfl'{. n01U~
~hF' . :.' .'
~~:
Agenda Item No. SA
, ...,January 15, 2008
Page 54 of 153
,..........
6'[ I 001 7. 0
004tt1E~ COUNH
001178
OR BOOK
001207
PAGE
19B1 JtJlI 30 If I Kl< 36
nECOROEO
~~
\tI~ ::::-----
TRUSTEE'S DEED
51Bl
Trust No.
THIS I1lOEHTUR1!, m.d. this 25th day of June '. 19-1lL
between CITIZENS AND SOUTHERH TRUST COMPANY (FLORIDA), Hat10n.] Association,
~ ~
.'
formerly THE HATIOHAL TRUST COMrANY~ Naples, Florida, duly authoriz'd to aoccpt
and execute trusts within the State of Florida. as trustee under the provisions
of a deed or deeds in trust duly recorded and delivered to ~aid corporation In'
pursuance of oil trust tlgreement dDtcd the .....nnL day of October \ 19_~
and known as Trust Number 51S1, pnrty to the f1rst part, and
'RADIO ROAO JOlNT VENTUREt a Florida General Partnership
cia Aerial Investmen Co. N~V.
of 5B20 North Federal HiQhw8V pbrty of the second part.
Bote Raton, florida 33431
WITNESSETH, that said party of tile first part. in consideration of the
Received $
. Received $ "f fA-. p; "~n. '916 ,
:LLI~gEOflO~H(b,,~ D.C.
To~ether w1t~ th~ ~enements and appurtenances thereunto be1onging.
TO, HAVE AND TO 'HOLD the same unto said party of the secDnd part, and to
the proper US~t b~nQfit and behoof forever of said party of the second part.
s'
~ 1\
I'
~~~
,~~
III
~'~"'-~",V-<'J.";:~(~~";,},,,,ol..\~,...~,",;;,,,,;,,,: "'",,.;.,, ,'."" '." ,", :;~".,l, ",',..>'" y'" ,,,,,.W.,,
......,,""'~
->'
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 55 of 153
. .
U
,
ExhibH
"A"OOI218
OR BOOl{
001208
PAGE
Co~~ncing at tho Northeast cor,ner of Section 36, Township
49 South, Range 25 E~Btl Collier County, Florida;
thancQ ulon, th~ En$t line of said Section 36~
South O. 00 36" East 1300.29 feet fo~ tho PLACE OF nEGUtNING
of the Parcel herein descrtbed;
th~nee continuing along tho East line of ~aid Section 36,
sout:h 011I AD' 36". 'East: 1345.31 feat to the East 1/4
corner of said Section ~6; thence continuing along the
ERst line of snid Sect:icn 36, South 00 15' 45" West
2582.80 feet to the North Right-af-Way line of C-856,
(Radio Road, 100' Right-of-Way);
th~nce along said North Right-of-Way line, South
B9- 11' 10" West 656.58 feat:
thence along the ~e&t line of the East 1/2 of the
SO\J~heast 1/4 of che Southeast 1/4 o.f said Section 3u,
No~th 0" 101 25" Eust 1267.31 feet; thence: along the
'South line of the t~est 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of
the Southeasc 1/4 of said Section 36. South 890 16' 0611
Hest: 658.51 feet; thence along the West line of the
Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Saction 36.
Horth 0.. 05' 05" East 1154.11 feet to the Southwe.st
cornel." of t'hat pa:rcel described in deed recorded in
O.R. Book 650, Page 49B, Collier County Public Records;
then~e along the South line 0 recorded in
D.n. Book 650. Page 498, S I East 220.33 feet;
thence along the East 1i rdad in
O,lL BaoK. 650. Pags 498 166.94 feet to
the Bas t & Hest 1/4 Ii ence
along the East: 0& tvest n 36,
Norch 8SCl 21' 021T Eas
~hence along the ~8St
WOS" 1/2 of the East
Section 36. North 0"
along the North line
Northeast ~/4 of said
40Q.40 feee; thence alo
Eas~ of (B~ measured at angles to)
the Yest: line of the :East ~
Northe.ast 1/4 of said See-tic J3
656.67 feet; ehence parallel wit
of said Section 36. North 89(1 211 02"
Place of Beginning;
being a part of ,the East 1/2 of Section 36. To~ship 49
South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. .
t e
;!l said
he.nce
the
02" East
70.00 fo..t
parallal wLth
2. of the
011 50" West:
sst & Weat.1/4 line
East 591.04 feet to the
LESS AND EXCEPtING THERtFROM; A trect of land lying ~n S3Pt T49S, R25E. Collier
County, Florid~~ b~ing more ~art1cularly desc~ibed as followS; Commanc~ng ~t tha
Southeast corner of said Section 35. run N 00 151421'E lllong" the !est Hne Df 536
a diatance'of 658.21' to the PDB 06 the hereinafter describeS tracti thence conttnue
N 00 15142uE 1316.40'; thence S 89 16'341'W 2001; thence N 00 lS142)\E 54.55'; thence
S B!10181341lW 60.0 ' to <<l, PDint of Curvature of a !'lon-tangent cur'lei thenci! 38.851
along the arc of a curve, conca~e to th& No~thwest. having e r~~tus of 26.00l and
subtended:by a chnrd nDv~ng a length Df 35.061 and bearing S 44 4710SnW to a potnt
of langency; thence S 89 IB'34IlW 271L51' to it P,9tnt of Curvature; tl1enc:e 39.65' 0.10ng
t~e ar~ of 0 curve. conceca to the Nortbenst, 6av1ng S radiu~ of 25.00~ and subtendad
by a chord n,vinO a la.9th of 35,62' and neari~ N 45 15'29"W to a ro\.nt Db Tongency:
thence S 00 10'281OW 1732.S9"lj thence S 15 Oli146'E 1~2.7D feet: thencs SOD 10'2611 W
120.00' to the Northerly ROW lln. of C-B5B (Rad18 Roadl' thence H 89 11'1~'E a&ono .
said ROW line a distance of 21~.4n'l the-nee N 00 131051 E 608.43' i thence N 89 13'38"E
337.63' to th~ POR. Slid tract containing 21.44 Acres more or l~ss.
ClTr/J:tN8 iINb SOIJI'jlHllN l'M~ D1.
~~~.( J"~ --
.,
r,"-" '" .. '.
.~~.
~l;',~~.wir,!&~enda ItelVTl No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 66 of 153
, ......-
o 01 2 7 B
OR BOOK
001209
PAGE
Exhibit "Au
continuE!d
AND LESS AND EXCEP7ING 7HEREFROM.
A parcel of land lying in Southeast quarter of S36. T49S. R25E, Collier County,
Florida, befng described as follows:
Commencing at the East quarter coro&r of said 530. run S 09021'02"W along the
quarter sect;on line 620647 feet to the P.OB; thence ~Dnti"He S a9021'02~W
480.05 feet~ then6e S 00 0510811 \of 329.48 feeti thence N 89 19'4711 E 479~S6
feet; tbence N 00 10'28" E 329.31 feet to the Point ~f Beginning. Said parcel
containing 3.63 OCr6$. more or less,
Subject to easements. ~estr1ct1ohS and reservations of record.
.
A parc~l at land lying 1n the Southeast qUB.rter of Section' )6,
TO\>lTLship 49 South, I~ange 25 East., Collier Count.y, Florida.. being
more particularly deso~ib9d a~ f~110WG'
Commencil.1g at the East i corner of said Section 36. run S 890
21' 02" \'} 620..47 feet along the quarter section line I thence S 000
10' 26" ~'I JZ9.Jl :faet to the POINt' OF aEGINNINGI thence continue
S 000. i.O' 28" 1..1 717.85 feet to the North 11ne. 01' Collier COl1l1ty
Produc~ion Park Phase lA, as recorded in Plat Boo~ 1J pageg S5 and
56 o:.~ tho Puhlie: Hncardg 0'" ,ilE.1@ ty, Floridal "tJ,(lnoo N 8Qo
49' )2" W ;0.00 !.:!et 110 ~, s't: r-i line. of Commercial
!.lou~evard, thence S 0 20" W 270.5 a.long said right-o!'-
w~;y liner thence S 3 0 . 0 then09 N 000 10' 2.8" E
6;8.79 tee'tl thence e t. thence N 000 10.'
28" E 329,44 feet, 32 16 foet to the Point
of Beginning. ~
:::;
,9
"" So
of reoord.
SUBJECT TO eusemcn'tB.
A parcel of ~and lying in ~ne Northeast quarter of Sec~ion )?!
~ownship 49 South, Range ~5 East, Co1lier Coun'ty, Florida, bD~t~
lnore particula.rly" described as :follows I
COIMnenclns: a't thl! !=:a.s't * corne. of' Baid. Sectiot\ )6. run S 890
21' 02" \~ along the quarter Gection line 620.47 tee-t to .'the POINT
OF BtcItlNINO I th~noe continue S 890 21' 0201 W 370..32 .f&Elt I t~encG
N 000 02' 27'1 w 359.;2 1'ae'tJ thence }II 890 21. OZ" E :no.:n faetl
'th~nce S 000 02 I 00" E 359.32 .feet 'to the Point of Bblginnl.i\.S.
S~id parcel contains ).05 acree. more or lass.
"
SUBJECT 10 a road easement over and acrose the East )0.00 feetl
ALSO, SUBJECT TO a rand easement over and across the South 60.00 fectl
Al.SO. SUDJf.Ci' '.1'0 OJ. utjlity Elusement over and DCt"O:i~t th~ South lo.on
r~~t und tho W~~t 10.00 foet,
ALSO, SUDLeCT '1'0 uasem\Jntc, r~~t,('ictionc and reaervationo of r.ocortl.
Cl'!'jz.ru,lY AND BOU'j'.lUU'I :J.'Jtu:u: OJ.
~'~X~It'lll.( :md ,~
~i~'"'"'''. ... ~:...,. : .
... '.~~!1~
L .......~_
,..
Agenda Item No. SA
~,."i.t . ,r.....i"...-~..l~nua(~ 5, 2008
Page: 57 of 153
001278
OR BOOK
00121 0
PAG~hibit nAil
.. . continued:'" . .:~
. . . " . ,:,;.~~::",-~~:~.,~'~>:'; '~':;~~>~i.i-:~:;'i~:(,,~tJ\t~.;:::;;~~;:
MtD LESS AND EXCEPTlNG THEREFROM: .'.. ":.:'..' {:':" .;~ . '::.' :'::',:'~.,.:.' \"(_~1;:~",~:,,:, '1, '~~.: ':~:~.:l. ',)j~..I';:J:
' .. '- l:.I.,\+.i~;~. .:oJ....,,-) "I' ",.~I . . ;~. . -", .. . .. '.1,:,',' ~
'.' ,. ~,~. ~;'.:'~i.":.~k4;;I~;.........'~;;:~',\ ';"~~'o/);'~f_; -:r::"i.,.;.j.~l:.o~':";"":~t~"'l~:t-.,l'
,.~. .'" '-'--I';I-:-r;-~""""; . .. ..r:\l"~'..."M."~"'''.''".t-':!t...t:".\\..".,:~J!",~~",!pl(1'',....-.Jo('l!'.''_v..:..(.'"",,.~
~E;J~' . I,: . ~'~::..: ~';~.' ;.,;~.~.~, .:~ "'!~~~' ~~.~~.f":;~':~~~~.::.i.II~~'r~~;;~n~1t:~::....~~.~~tt:r~~,*~~~$i:::0;:,~~,it;.'J,; ~~.
'~';:'..J:"..' ... ;:.~. ~,:"'-:'-~;'f:;l'., :EASEMENT IOR' U~gRESS AND "teRES. ~':~~\l~~~S:€f~f':I:-i.:~~;y.:ti-~W~(''=t~~:'/
;.<):....... .~..:..,.." .C'" ,.... . ;,,,',:,., "..,......<..,.,..:,-,.."l:~,.~~;t'l\l~.;i\~;;a.'tr'.,f~~:.,..;.:;:.:.'"
~...j..;:."?1~~~~~':~;:"~~.'.I~~:u.~~~'tt:."'.,..1,~~'~ISED):.i.t..~~..?1r~.~l ..~ ..;..~~~:"1:'t~"W5~~~io~'l"~,'L~lqf.-:~i;~...'
,....i:-:.. . ....';.."li..~,.,~,...... "';t,.:~~.,l"",~~"~""""" ..,~j:j. :l-:-il, ~1f4',":."i._'-...r.'t'...,...... :1.''P"....:(..''it..:.,.i.~.......
'~r.~ ...e_M fOt",..J.DgU.~ la~ul" t:,I~III.:~!er.~n4, ,....~~!la. .::p,1 t.:&r.::.t~..::s~,,,,~,!-'e&.c. h.~""'2-:ii~.!"':~~"::';:~".z' ~.,'
~~t""'qu.rtn'-o~ ~~.~t:Ul!,' 36..~~o>>;ra~~,:lp 4~ "OU~hJ.~,'Ra,~Be~2S'~IIi.~'t'Col1ier.CtJ~~. '.~F1ol",icl.. :;:~~."';'~.t:l~-' ~
:.~'b.1!Ic.t.cIrl' pauic;ulal'l)' 4tElcr,tbi6 ~~~fo,"llov81 ~t.if:k1:""~UW~t..Jl;l'\~"- ';~it..'i>;.-':';~Jr:t,!jt--.:\..,.
~fti';"?"':J~;...:.~:~,~;f_.~:~~-::"~~1'(.4'~~~~~~~~'fi~~~~~~r. ..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'f~:,~~.....,
;.. "~""';: eo.....dQI ;}~,~ ..~,~e.~_t".h,~~',:.'?t~~~~.!-t~~ ~3~t..:.:t~!"'~~~Jr ;-'!lrs.o~t..ti.:.!,!Q.I~-:;~ ":..~1:~':l,,:',*1 :
~~.t. .Col~1..t C,au?t,... ~P!;~~.~,..th~~~,.:.;uopc. thlJ; ElI;8t~Ye~t\.q~r~v:T..~q-_t:lo~.~1~.'l-.~'t.~"'t:y..\.~'!'f:t
j.,~a s,: :21,~\..q.'.Z':~~1I ~?.Q~~~ !~~t.fl~t~,n~~";I')P~'!~?~~~:H~"628'~~~'!lr.ttt::tO~:J;bj?;PO~~'lF.1:Qt~le~~~", ~:'.:J. -:..
~!.r;pmlllo G.". ~~.. .~~~.n8'~..r~.~e.~~r~~~:'.5~"~n~~: !;~~t~~,,@i;"R.7!t~':i.C . J~~~~,~~9i~.:t:~
:,~j..,~.!et. ~~.o ,tt~. .HGrtfl:'~~'bt-:O~":~(Ir.~+.t.~".tO~;~.~~~~~I:cY.8.~~...:...:..G;~ ~ji".tbO ~ lI~or~~cI~r.:t.~-::.... :.
..~Plat. ,of, Cc.l~1u .;Cwn.r,~ ~.roduc~:tcm:;Pprk;,phaall":llp..":lI1 r.dO~d.d'~':lq~b~.JlDpk'!-J.3.:~':!P.Be..~.1~..5:' ~~ .
,il~ 5S. .n~ 'S6, pllliuc' .ec!Qrdi:'ot~:cOl1i';:'~nt)' ~.'~'rip~1d&r tli.iic.~l~,*-~\)Jor,{tiult':l&ht:':~ '$;~t r.:~ 1 :-',.
";,~b'f-v"'7 'u.tl.',:~t::h'1.11 ~cpae~c.la.i !;'i9u~.~~f!I~\l;f- ~'?~~ ~~:.)2lf;.~ ~~~~AA;ff,l;i~.:tl}i:~l:th,~'.J~~,^,~~2:' ':::
.,;~.."~n C~f1Ir.l' of" .~;'d CQ1U.aI:'CoUDt:y~~,:todu!lt10D .1,.tk.J'h..~. .'1~;, .tb.cD~;fi.."S.~i'iB.~r~4~~ '~;rr?:.~T';'.1 :'~'"
..:.~.669 .48.!eu; .thtlnc:. N(po*' 05.....,08.. I_.-tlo.oo l..d .~miiic.e'~.~:. BSI~S'h;l\"11i'7~Sl:S8 fII,r ~:...:.;'~_i; ,
:.\.1:0 thl! POlK! O'.'BtcINNtNa::"f:~.ff.i;..y~.~".,I;'.'?-~"'~~:"~""':J''''~'~'''~~~r.i.:'~~~~'~ ,~:;,~t.V~,~~/~~!iJ.ii?::;:;;. .
.i';;~:~'';:'r ..;.;'~~~:~~:"~j~:;~~:;:"':',:::;~':~i'~~.~""f..;l~~!tl:~~~~.;f~~:_;~I~~\~:~lj.k~',:.:;.lJIf~.~ . :~'l~:U. ~...., :-;~. .." "
A p.T~al of 1aD~ 1,;;& in ~~ S~u~h.&;; ~~.~t~~ ot &.ct!Ob 36, Town.hip 49'Sou~b.
Rani_ 25 Ent. Collier CD~ty. .1orU..... bd.as ItOn p--arttcu,l.arly d..crLbt"'... fdlo".i
Co...ocins..t the ~.t i curn.r at Gee~~D Tovoahlp 49 Soutb. 2ange 25 ~.t.
Col1:t..li Cowtl'. 1'1oJ:.i.cla; z:t!ebce alo qwtl'tar ...Ctl(J1I l1na" S 89" 2.1"
02"1 " 620.47 hn; tb.pce Ii 00. th.D~" S 8!i14 18' ~" W
352,16 t..t to tha rOlWl 0' rlb.4 paxc&l; 'tb.DC..~QO;tDue
S 89. IB' 34M V 121.4~ f..~. 28" E 29. B f..ti the~ . 89 1.
4711 E 127... t..t; tb.hee ~. t.., 0 hs pOIn Of ).tGUIltIl:lG.
Said pare.l conta1Q. ~.g, .
SUaJtcT TO . roa4 ......n~
ALSO.. SUBJECt TO ......Qt..
IiI.!
~! !
" ,
~ ~~ !
~~.Ill~'
i t '~
~-s ~l'
36.
Florida,
Commencing at a concrete monument ~Qrkin9 the northwest
corner of Let: 12 or "CoLlier Count.y producti.on Pa.r.k, Pha..
l-~~, a subdivision as recorded in P~at Book 13, pag..
55 and S6 lof the public Records of Collier County, !"lor1.da,
run NOC.10'28"t: a.long ~he eAst line of COIM'lercial Bouleva.:d
ext8ndsd a distance of .S2.23 feet t.o the Point of Boq1nning,
thence 989-1&134-W 3Q.00 feBtl" thence NOO.IO'2B"'B 943.90
fellt, thence NB9\118134"S 618.75 fliJet to the eaaot line 4;:lf ..
tne northea$t qua.rter of SAid Section 36, thence SOO.03f06"E'
alonCj liai.d east line 437.94 fQAt: to a caJ'l.CreeB I\Cnument., ~ '.
ma.:king eh. CAst quarter corner at said Sect.ion 36 J thenoe
SOO.U.142f1W aloJ'l.IjI' t.h. eaut li.ne of t.h. southe.at:. qU4rt.OE'
of said Section 36, a d!Bt~nce o~ 505.95 feet, thance'
SS9-lBI3C1W Sa'.71 feet to the point of Beqinninq.
The above describ&D An areA of llpp~oxima.tely 13.43 acres
of land.
If,BN :rJ\utn co.
C1'l'\2.I!I'IiANP!oUTl
~:~"9W ,""-
;""
001278
OR BOOK
00121 I
PAGE
GRAN10R COY~n4nts and warrZlnts that the prO(lerty h froe Qf <ill
ancumbra~~e5 made ~~ Grantor, Qxcept that this deed is subject to the .~ollowing;
1. Conditions, restrictions, limitations and ea5~~ntt of retard. if any.
but this provisiDn shall not operate to reMi~pD~e the ~ame.
2. Zoning and other ~pvernmental regulations affecting the us. and
OC'~pa"cy of the real property.
3. TAxes end ~sseSI~nts for current and subsequent years.
4. ~tBn of every trust deed~o~ mortg~ge (1f any tnere bo) of record tn
~.id county given to secure' the payment Dfmoney, ~nd re~ining
unreleased ot the date of the delivery thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ,aid party of the fir,t port ha' cau,ed It, corpo~ate
~eal to be nQreta affixed and h~s ~auses its name to be signed to these
presents b~ its duly authoriled officer. the d&y and year first above written.
Signed, se~lecV,and de11verad
in the presence of:
'~ -
IX. ,'-;
l:::t LI..(. ;I-
I ,
'--""/
/./J,t,,,.
C 1TI ZEKS AIIO SOUTHERN TRU~ COtII'AllLI FLQR I DA)
NatiOflal Association, formerly ,"F:h."Nat1on"1
Trust COll1umy. Naples, florida, ,ai,,~rultee ,
under land Trust No. ~,~l:II' '
BY;=C..,,~;,' C;" (:"~~r...'-'-""
JOKATHAN G. GRANGER!
Vice President
(SEAL)
STATE OF Fl.ORlOA l
COUNTY.oF COLLIER .
I HEREBV CERTIFY
ttka Icknowl.og;.ntl p
fflter duly qualified to
. GRANGER Vice President
n the pre,ente of two
subscriblnv witn.'s.s fra.ly and vo rll~ under authority ve,ted !n --!UlL.
by ,aid corporation and th.~ the ,eal afflx~ thereto Is the true corporate .
,
5oe&l af u1d ,corporation.
WITNESS ~ hend and 'off1clal ..al In the County .nd State la't aforesaid
this --lll!!.. day of
,lun~
. ,19 87 ,
g
i
P
~!I
i~1
~ ..'
f'(Yb h Cl.A~ .:.., -""
NOTARV PU~ C . ~
worm _Ie UAn tII fl(lJ\1t),! .
",oaISSlOlm, <<l12'l;tlll
BoCl[(1 r~.~ '''rUM 'lb, \lIlO.
THIS'IHSTRlllENT PREPARED BY:
CITIZEHS AND SOUTHERN TRUST COMPANY
(FLORIDA). Kation.l Association
Po O. Box 1857 .
K.pl.s. Florida jl~3~
\
',\
, IIn~M ~rr1 V..111'"
It,u"~,~, "r.~,,).Of...
r.v"'-l""looou.,h,l~j)Ilr
~'Vl~'~,;:b':::1.~:,~::',:},\' :. _...:', J.: "''-'
Agenda Ilem No. 8.'1.
january 15, 2008
Page 58 of 153
"'-l'_;il~
(i)
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRI~ge 59 of 153
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUDZ-2006-AR-I0376
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE; 8/28/06
KAY DESELEM
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
'DEPT.. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
- WWW.COLLIERGOV.NI[!
r-
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
.0. PUD Rezone 0 PUDlo PUD Rezone [j PUD Amendment
_11
Date: 1- g -Ob .._ Time: 8':30 Firm: NlId\Oe.\ FdMvvlp...:-PLQnJl:t~)Q.\DfrnwJ TI\C.-
Pr~~LName: _1'1 C l\l ~l~ ~m\'M(' wJ ?Q\,cl_~_~____.. ~ - ---~--
Applicant Name: R,o.d. ~D M,~; \1\+ \f Q l'1td((I~~,,~_ Phone:_J,103- [Q,93 t+
Owner Name: .$Q.fY]g.-__ Phone:_,,~,.~ ._-,_.,-~_.~
Owner Add'es",....,
_.,~~_CitY..,__.... ,State_...
ZIP
Existing PUD Name and Number tJ I A.._.._~__._..,,_____.._
Assigned Planner_~l4- base~
Meetii1gAtl',,"cle~~: (ClttClch 51gt) In Sheet)
w/fVl
l\~*\~~\ofiJ t~~w..('C.\(J
Submillal Requirements (r.f.r to application fo' additional requirements} o.Q..(Usum Vli \AiX' ~ OS \'u
24 Copies of the following: 0.\\ Q.DMV'NIi-Clol pI ,t$J~lI\f
i 1 additional sel if located in the Bayshore/Gatewoy Triangie Redevelopment Area) (~CJ..Q..ut1a.J1
Completed Application (o.<>l.Ul'\lectc\ c.u.r(~()r forM! Y\\XI{-
Pre-application Meeting Notes
~ Conceptual Stte Plan 24X 36" and One 8 V, X 11" copy
IZJ PUD document and Master Plan plus one 24" x 36" copy of the Master Plan "
2 Copies of the following: G\~5 W,\\ k.. -t\&\1.L,
g] Deeds/Legals & Survey (tf boundary of original PUD is amended) \...' ttm i ~~\C-l\8t
!8;1 List Identifying Owner & all porlies of corporation \ V\~~
~ Owner/Agent Affidovit signed & notartzed -\(1
. [gJ Covenont of Unified Control
lZ! Completed Addressing Checklist
4 Copies of the following' r 0e, ~ I ~ ~ u.iJ20 ~ ; n ~OO c..f
~ 0 Environmentollmpact Statement (EtS) or waiver~ rov
[ZJ Historical Surveyor waiver request t> ~ .
00 Utility Provisions Statement w/sketches "DeuC(oSb<t, Wi ~":lt-Ie.. $ ~~'( WI Dvt\(,
lSl~-JA:iA~rchitectural rendering of proposed structures J
~ Architectural Review required
lZl Survey, signed & sealed '--:Pia:> V 10E E:'cr~ =f!t ~ E]>6El-'J=.f.J\S C-l-e1>..e.Ly U::-BEl...ED
A!,"tt:> V$S - 'f'o~ ~\l\1>. R,",VI"W~. .'1-,. A L06-Y
)g Seven C}) Traffic Impact Stotement (TIS) or waiver tI u f 'i-o C-o ,I ucll f1 t " i!
fiNO lIeee >>
gj Five (5) copies of Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1" = 400'
K1
IZl
One (1) Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans {CDRom or Diskette)WI~
0'( ({'i.v.lom,'t\'o"/
One (1) Letter of no obiection from the United States Postal Service. Contact Robert M, Skebe
at (239) 435-2122,
to tnv\r~ VJI ~
,
I!.a.ch sl<bm\1trJ
ill
Sur\J4j
,Fees:
Application Fee,
l8:l $1 0,000 (PUe Rezone) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
o $8,000 (PUD to PUD) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
0$6,000 (pUD Amendment) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
.Agenda Item I~o. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 60 of 153
i $150.00 Fire Code Review
$2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review
$500.00 Pre-applicatian fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more alter the date of the last pre-app
meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required,
181 $729.00 legal Advertising Fee for eepe meeting (to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Dally
New,).
j $363.00 Legai Advertising Fee for Bee meeting
$2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee
.. Property Owner ~Iotiflcation fees. Property Owner Notifications $1.00 Non-certified; $3.00 Certifieel return
receipt mail (to be paid affer receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zonirlg & Development Review)
Fee Tolal t___,
r-'~--'
,L~ <.,...-.
~~~etin9 Note~~
...._~__ ~.__.'_ n~
~-- ~I
:W-r\ \\=C.'T N(i'\iN\r;=' \~F'MS") p,~~":c)\')~,~D\.')\W"::>\N~'\'\C=fl:>\~I..)VV\if":,~
'\v
U ~
i.J6-! l.B
U)C t7, oS..... 09 ~i--'<- -=s;~P0j2Q h~~D-j
t()~ ~jt~ io eJwd2l'/:d: ~itR r f)Uf) dt5affi1{~-
t
* I~ tl~~ /1= ~JNk- m.JJPiridU ~Qs;' ~11bJ/Lf:~.. l?a" ~
J
~J~,MD;)~.
/
1'12c1\J\c:>'I< t-lm\OQ.\.rA-,-,ow FoIL
"':?\..a.GS ~I-\.U~ \\.\E..
.o.wy
1'00
\l"P:. --'i4l.c;;>~ \..:/11..\ EA.~I=l-ST'; Ei2l
1::rlClJ..IV\BJ\ \D ....1.J1-\\~ lllC. RPn \10t:l6./-lr y_
G:\CUfrent\Pre~App forms\PUD pre~app.doc
Revised October 11, 2005
~ ~
cry
0-
N
I
cry
~
N
I
Q2 0-
M
w N "
Z ....
Z .. :E
<( <II <(
.... .a z ~
Q., E , ':S
"
0 ~ " ~
'""
W Z
-i Z <II ~
0 c:
Vi 0
VI .c:
<( Q.,
<{ '"
CD
co ~
'0
co co
2 <l!
Q)
'" co
";2 (L
G:i
::.:r:
<
bJj
~~
<U. ~
I~~
!I ::l ==
-l~~
~Z
~'-'
.-.I.'~
~r.J':l
b
l-<
~
~
z
1=
,Jl ~
Q~
~~
, ~
cia
~
(l)
'~
a::
-
c:
(l)
E
a.
o
a;
>
<II
o
"tl
c:
tI
....
~
tIl
c:
'c
o
N
...
o
-
<II
c:
>
o
~-
l:l ,"..~iii
al
"tl ..
<(
'0
E :?f
Q) w
1i
III
CLl
Q
-
c:
<II
E
t:
tI
Q.
Ql
o
--
i
~
'" :J; -....
~ 'J
IX i;j
a (~
a
<(
-'
<(
:E
.
....
'-:i
-
"
l-
ll.
....
a
--
z
o
in
~
a
>-
I-
Z
::l
o
V
c{
l
I
~ , '..{) \ ,
.\r<- \'()"rot;t::
~::, ri N ~I :::r-
-hi ,- I -t f2
, I! ~
I . e
I
'... ~
'", '"'
q -::,
~
I"
.~
"
o
?;
<::!
'"
,;
~
N
o
i?5
05
-g
In
.;;
~
'\
Q
C'\
u
o
'q
6
<6
N
2>
~
1ii
"
.c
In
.~
C
OJ
.;;;
'0
"
'"
.;;
~
'"
0.
0.
~
<;,
Ii.:
-_.. ...... .......... Vi .UVp
L.oUIIIE!r LO. HUUh:t:.bblNu
~.q.l .
\tj -:J.n~.q. Agenda ItemFf\ro~ SA
:;03PM; Pl'lIi'l"a[Y 15, 2008
[15. ()~ Page 62 of 153
()5,()IO'-f~(Q)[P)\
SENT.BY; PLANNING DEVELOPMENT;
12392636991;
JAN.!! .
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following lIJld submit for review to the Addressing Section 6t 2800 Nonh Horseshoe Drive
or tax 10 (239) 659-5724, Not all items Win alJIllv 10 every oroiecl, Items in bold Ine W'C rcauired. Completed
addres9ing checldistls required at the Pre-Application meeting,
I. Leg-I de.eriplion of subject property or properties (copy vJlenglhy rle..tTipllu" may be oitached)
Seclion 36 Tnwr>.h;p 49. Ran!!e 25 - CollierCountv Production Perk
p....... 3-A relICt A BOd Ph.... I-R /.01 27
2. Fell/o (Propo;rfy 10) Ilumber(s) of above (allach to, Dr assocla'e with, legal descriptioll if more than one)
27165000258 and 27155001500
3. Slreet address or addre.sses (at applicable, if Q/reody ass;fJ1Ud)
Northwest comer of Radio Road and Livinf!ston Road 14787 Radio Road and 4874 Marlc.et A venu"
Access limited to ~adio and Livinllston Roads
4. lAIeatiGn ...p, showine el'lICt location ofprojocllsitc in relstionto nearest puhlie mad right-of-way (allach)
5, Copy of survey (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPtA TTED PROPERTIES)
6. Proposed project name (if app/lalble)
McAlnine Part. - Commerclr!! Center
,. Proposed'StrecI names (jf applicable)
NOllUlDlieable
8. SUe Development Pion Number (FOR EXISTING I'ROJECTSfSITlOS ONLY)
SOP
9. PetitiOIl'!Ype - (Complete n separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type)
DSDP (Site Development Plan) 0 PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
o SDrA (SOP Amendment) ~ PSI' (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
o SOPI (SOP Insul>slantial Change) FP (Finall'lat)
o SIP (Site Improvement rlllll) LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
o SIPI (SIPI InsubSl4lltiaJ Change) BL (Blasting rennit)
o SNR (Street Name Cbange) 0 ROW (Right-of.Way Permit)
o VcgetlltionfExotic (Veg. Removal Permits) 0 EXP (Excavation Permit)
~ Land Use PctitiOll (VarillllOCl, Conditionlll Use, B VRSFP (Veg, Removal & Site Fill Permit)
Boat Dock EXl., Rezone. PUP rC1.ane, ete.) mR (Transfer ofDevelopmenl Rights)
t8J Olher - Describe: GMP.FLUE-o.ositv Ratinl! SVSlmn B. Urban Commercial CIsmel- Section
10. Uvin2ston !R.8dio Rd. Commercial Infill District. 5.CJ.t/- narccllO be dcvcloDCd with un to
50.000 SQ. ft, comm=ial and mav or roev not include residcntieJ withln 8 mixed use with un 10 16
units/""Il:.
10. Project or development names proposed for, or Illrelldy appearing in, C<1ndominium documenls (if
applicable; indicate whlllhcr proposed or eristing)
11. Please Cbeclt One: t8l Checklist is 10 be Faxed Rac1c 0 Per.;(>nally Pie1ced Up
12. Appllc.,,' N_e Michael R, Fem.l\J'ldcz / I'D! Phone 239-263-6934 F... 239-263-6981
13. Signaroreon Addre~ng Cheeldist does not conmtute Projecl and/or Street Name approval and is subject 10
furtber review by the Addressing Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primary Numberc"'Z. n <i5
Address Nwnbcr c., z n g
Address Number (~ Zll-. -;'.
Addre~ Number
Approved by ,lln..~ /J1.);(.'2ro--. Date DI- !? - 0{..
\Ajut
hui 't>LS~Le-.y1'\
ftJo '6~ 3; 3D - q : ~O
Details
l\gend&l~11'ltf ~l\
january 15, 2008
Page 63 of 153
Folio No.11 27165000258 Mimll
-
Current Ownership
Property Addrea.\14787 RADIO RD
1..'-
Legalll COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION!'K _.
\...!'Ii 3.A TRA CT A_.
I
,,' I
--1
Zlpl~' 6407 I
I
1
Strap No. I
228700 A 14A36 '1
[Owne, Namell RADIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE
1 AddreaaeaU1100 5TH AVE S STE 201
I Cltyll NAPLES IL
Statellf.L,
IL_,
L Section
1- 36
II Township
iL- 49
Range
25
IL
~L
Acres
4.22
It
r
Map No. ..--JI
4A38 II
Il=
Jf
QUb No~L 226700" -II COL..~.UER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE 3,Al[3t,!(Ill!allo,ArllaJI
L.:fl\lSO_c.9d~, Il~~' J~(;ANT INDUSTRIAL ",..~I" 274 II
"l'l Millog~.=J
13.5704"-:=J
2005 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History
(Subject to Change)
If all Values shown below equal 0 this
parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll
I Land Valua II $ 1,424,250.00 I L Date ~c:: Book.. Page ._:=JI-;;:;;;;;;;~I
lJ!LImproved Vallla Ie. ~
I ('1 Markat Value ',i' $,1.<424,250:00]
f(.) SOH Exempt Value 11_ $ 0.00 I
I 1=1 Asses.ed Valuo .. II. $ 1,424,250.00 I
m Homestead ~~d other Exe;;'pt Value II" .. $ 0.00 I
L t=1 Taxable Value ir=='$ 1,424,250.00 l
SOH = ~Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment
Increases.
~
The InformaUon is Updated Weekly.
http://v.'Vo.'W.collierappraiser .com/RecordDeta i Lasp?F 0 lioID=000002 716 5000258
2/7/2006
Details
Agend?~INlf ~A
january 15, 2008
Page 64 of 153
Folio N~127155001500 iYl.P II
~
Current Ownership
Property Addressl14674 MARKET AVE
I. Ljl COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK".
,._~_ _ ~SE 1-B LOT 27,____,~...
I
~
,__ "'I
-_____-==:1
I Section II Township 11__ Renge --------.J! Acres Ii Map No. iL. Strap No. ..J
c: 36 II 49 11" 'ZS-" II 0.66 '"II 4A3il' 11228100274A36 J
~Ub NO.le 22810D 11 COL.LlER CNTY PR.~E PRK 1B.'----l[:'t) Milll1~-.-J1 -'\1 Miullil"- J.
DjJH~Odjl 1I---.o,=:::J~CANT INDUST~IAL__:_ Il~,~.:=J~~5704 _
L Owner Nemell RAOIO ROAD JOINT VENTURE
L-.-- Addres.e.lj110D 5TH AV~ 5 STE 201
L City I NAPLES II
Statell FL
.-EEl134102 - 640!
2005 Final Tax Roll latest Sales History
(Subject to Change)
If all Values shown below equal 0 this
parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll
I Land Value 11- $ 340,000.00 II Oate L_ Soo_k - Pag;---JI--A;;;;;~nt':::::J
li'1.lmproved Value ' ll_,__~~
no) Market Value. :=11. $ 340,OOO:DOj
~,H Exempt Value .--JC . $ 0.00 I
I I=l Asse.sed Value L $ 340,000.00 I
r~) Home,tead' and otbar Exempt Valuell ' '$O:Ool
I (=) Taxable Value iC:=- $ 340,~
SOH'" "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to C.ap on assessment
increases.
~
' ..
Th.e Information Is Upda\ed Weekly.
bttp:/lwww.collierappraiser.com/RecOl.dDetail. asp?Folio ID=000002715500 1500
21712006
<1:ro'"
roO'"
".'~."'-
'0
~'"
.:: ",- (0
,1) >. CD
===mOJ
('J=::m
::J:::o..
cro
(1;)-:>
en
<1:
~I[~O
.---..._1
Co
o~o~ "OIS'PtlV.I~
'1
,
,
'Jt " . "I. . j~
,:oDiGj ~r'{7~2tR' ~~~ TT
,.' ' , :J [..:.~l ".' '. . " ,:,,, ~;,~~,LL
'-t11,JJr[ {WilT -Ii' ~
, r-fnl.l I ..--L-J1U
r~'~'1 L i -4r- --1" '"1 il~
-- 't ---J'- .,,-[,I'I'I.rT~ MI!
. --.. I~I ,!i I' I '~_~_ -:.~ ~,- ~, III
1---1 l--';~ t : ,',' I . _ I I ~~ I~
'.. I. J I ~ 1-.. I" . t.' j.. '.'c~"~"", ,
-[-~ r~ ',,--i. nr: .t~j 1_1 r
-=-Ei'C I ,lie ~jilf~!l,,4,~r 'Ii
--I C rl~T--lrc ~ · i '..L,!'"' 4jl
iL 11"
" "~
I Q~"
'! 0. ~
~e f
'I
.
~ ~
:1
!
II
.~
.....~~l
3:tj 8~
..~~~L} r-' [--L-
~i!', -
~o '.
\' "
x
--.L
LLl
,
I.....
!~
xlI'
11
'.
n
.
h
I
.
!I
"
.~>.
,-
I
.:."").~,_.- ~'
$.mn ~~o n1.J.N. '#'
"'/'
If -."ll:l..:.2fOlll$d1l1't
"
ss,s~
L--
~lllg ~';ffi::;
~ ~~ 'Ii':~ ~ ~~:ri
01' '" !t _1--' C> '" z rn
t ! ~ ~j :. 5 .~ ~
i f! ll,;I~ g ,',
~ ~ ~ ~[ 8 ~ ~ I'
8 .... ~I r '"
:,0 ~' 'I '" C .,
11:" I !:o! ~ ",""
~ ~'~ j ,. ::.: ~ ~
~ n ~,~~~L~
~ ~ ~b ~=='~
,
;: ~
, ..
, , i
, , ,
, i !
,
, ,
~ ! ~
, ,
" , !
, , ,
! ,
i
ij ; .
, ,
~ 1
:~ r. r
j
,
u
I
,
,
<
~
,/
"-d"-'J) ",-".,
",-ro..",.",-:o-,-, "'-'-'_,
I ....,... ';;:~-7:' :;'_-~;:::-
L ....nf-'.-,...-,.-.
?'.... ,_.c_-"", "-,,
lI'_.."...._.......,.
......<....-.'ll'o"..,.oo
0'." ,:~.:."t'_.:: ~~:~_-.., '
'"-'o-<>d,,.('{_,
,---"'=-
I t~
.,
, w
z
~ "
~
0 ^
z oc
~ <
0 c
m z
w ~
0 !
~ m
"
z ~ w I
z
" ~ 0
~ :; '"
" r 0 1;
~ " z ~ ~
"' I} .
~ ~ ~ iL'i ,,~~!~,,~~~::
~ " ~
< < <' >
U U U ;; ~~i~i**;;~
0 0 "
~ " " ^ ,
I . ~~~Il~fl~~ll
,
- ~~
I , 1 J~
- i i i g~
I eJ 4 ~ t€~
*,iii;;
:tj/: ~n;~
ih~~P,ig~:
Im~!M!!
i ~',"'.n"~"~S!
"
,
G H P Q~ep-r
i\genda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 66 of 153
(XII) 8. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to encourage the development and re-development of
commercially zoned properties with a mix of residential and commercial uses. The
residentiai uses may be located above commercial uses, in an attached building, or in a
freestanding building. Such mixed-use projects are Intended to be developed at a human-
scale, pedestrian-oriented, and interconnected with adjacent projects - whether
commercial or residential. Within one year of the effective date of this Subdistrict, the Land
Development Code shali be amended, as necessary, to implement developing pursuant to
the regulation governing this Subdistrict.
Projects utilizing this Subdistrict shall comply with the following standards and criteria:
1.This Subdistrict is applicable to the C-1 through C.3 zoning districts, and to
commercial PUDs and the commercial component of mixed use PUDs where those
commercial uses are comparable to those found in the C-1 through C-3 zoning
districts.
2. Commercial uses and development standards shall be in accordance with the
commercial zoning district on the subject property.
3. Residential density is calculated based upon the gross commercial project
acreage. For property in the Urban Residential "'ringe Subdistrict, density shall be
as limited by that Subdistrict. For property not within the Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict but \\Iitllln the Coastal High Hazard Area, density shall be limited to four
dwelling units per acre. For property not within the Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict and not within the Coastal High Hazard llrea, density shall be limited to
sixteen dwelling units per acre.
4.ln the case of residential uses located within a buiiding attached to a commercial
building or in the case of a freestanding residential building, building square feet
and acreage devoted to residential uses shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of
the gross building square footage and acreage of the project.
5. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with adjacent
properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged.
(XIII) 9, LivinQston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commerciallnfill Subdistict
This Subdistrict consists of + 2.25 acres and Is located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Livingston Road and Li\lingston Road/East - West to be known as
Veterans' Memorial Boulevard. The Subdistrict allows those office uses, medical uses
and financial institutions permitted by right and by conditional use within the C-1 Zoning
District of the Collier County Land Development Code, as of the effective date of
adoption of this Subdistrict. (Adopted October 26,2004 by Ordinance No. 2004-71) This
Subdistrict is designed to serve the surrounding residential uses within a convenient
travel distance to the subject property. It is further designed to be compatible with the
neighboring residential uses through the development standards provided herein, along
with other planning considerations.
The maximum development intensity allowed is 50,000 square feet of building area with
a maximum height of 3 stories, not to exceed 35 feet Access to the property within the
Subdistrict shall only be permitted from Veterans Memorial Boulevard. There shall be no
access permitted directly to or from Livingston Road.
(XIII)10. LivinQston/Radio Road Commerclallnfill Subdistrict
/tThiS Subdistrict consisls_ + 5.0 acres located at the northwest corner of the intersection < _'
--- of Livingston Road and Radio Road.
,
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 67 of 153
,.
This Subdistrict allows for those permitted and conditional uses set forth in Commercial
Intermediate Zoning District (C-3) of the Collier County Land Development Code,
Ordinance 91-102, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict.
(Adopted October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004-71) However, the following
conditional uses shall not be permitted:
1. Amusements and recreation services (Groups 7911,7922 community theaters only,
7933,7993,7999 boat rental, miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental, rental
of beach chairs and accessories only.)
2. Homeless shelters, as defined by the Land Development Code.
3. Social Services (8322-8399)
4. Soup kitchens, as defined by the Land Development Code.
To encourage mixed use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development
when iocated in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such
residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre;
the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density.
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide services, including retail uses, to
surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance to the subject property.
These uses are not an entitlement, nor is the maximum density for residential uses in a
mixed-use building. Such uses, and residential density, will be further evaluated at the
time of rezoning approval to insure appropriateness in reiation to surrounding properties.
The maximum development intensity aliowed is 50,000 square feet of building area for
commercial uses with a maximum height of three (3) stories, not to exceed 35 feet
However, for mixed use buildings - those containing residential uses over commercial
uses - the maximum height is four (4) stories, not to exceed 45 feet. Access to the
property within the Subdistrict may be permitted from Radio Road, Market Avenue and
Livingston Road. Any access to Livingston Road shall be iimited to the northern one-
third of the project's Livingston Road frontage and shall be limited to right-in, right-out
access. Further, access si1all be consistent with the Collier County Access Management
Policy in effect at the time of either rezoning or SOP application, whichever policy is the
more restrictive.
(XIV) 11. Vanderbilt Beach Road NeiQhborhood Commercial Subdistrict
The purpose' of this Subdistrict is to provide primarily for neighborhood
commercial development at a scale not typically found in the Mixed Use Activity
Center Subdistrict. The intent is to provide commercial uses to serve the
emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to
provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area.
Allowable uses shall be a variety of commercial uses as more particularly
described below, and mixed use (commercial and residential). Prohibited uses
shall be gas stations and convenience stores with gas pumps, and certain types
of fast food restaurants.
This Subdistrict consists of two parcels comprising approximately 17 acres,
located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and east of Livingston Road,
as shown on the Subdistrict Map. For mixed-use development, residential
density shall be limited to sixteen dwelling units per acre. Residential density
shall be calculated based upon the gross acreage of the Subdistrict parcei on
.,
~
....
-l
~
~
j:1!xJ
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'I
"
"
'I
.
'"
--'=:~.::-.::-::;:",==--~
" ~ -p-"A"P'
'~~=~]Fc1~~'~~~'~::::"
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 68 of 153
~ ~;
~~h
.~~ ~~
~~\tn
~I~
~ ~ ~i
~~~l1\
~~h
~
~
<
-k'
~
tv
~~\ ~
~o::.
. ~~ ~~
.... :-.. \
~
!
~ ~ I~
~'1l~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~~~
.......~
: III! I It
I II I I,........ II
I III I.., I[
I III I n( I,'
I III I ~ I
! III I I,'
! III I ",. I,'
Iii : I '-4 III
llltl" l..u ','
11111.... I,
' 1111.... l'
J ~ll ~ 10 d
illll~ : ,::
i I!! I ,L-----~llr -Ji
--- 1- q++--------. ~ 1 I I II
--------- ..., 1[ I 1 I I I II
-------- : : i : i - -----------~-H--7f-----ll!1
- -'-'--.--- I I I
---) 1 I r _~ !
i -(~-::t.~====:=:=:=~::~11:::::=- I
:f~----~--n", " , ~ :: I A
' l= 'Z , __:.'" W.
lr-~ (!i ~.I~
' " ,"
: - : ~ 'ii
' " I" ~
I .. :: 'I:
' 'I ,'s
' " " ,-
' "......... "-
' , , ....' "."
: :'"'" 'I-.j
, 'I ". , :.
' ".... '"
I :' . Ii
I I: 1'1 "
: ':'0 :1
: :' :1
' 'I '"
' " '"
' " "
' " "
I II II
' : I "
I 'I II
' " '"
' " '"
' " "
I :: I:
,~. , , , "
... I : , "
' "t "
"'" ': ,[I
w. I 11 III
. " "
,,~ , I, "
'"' I , , ::
v, 'I' "
I I ~ 'i
'-l , I , I,
't I[ II!
' " "
' J I! II
' " "
' I, "
' " "
: I, 'I
: ~ l li1l\li:
'!'" ,[ II
' V'V" , , "
i ':l.~. if~ il ii
' 'il''fo " , I "
I - I: ,:1
: I: '::
I " "
I I: ii
' " "
I 11 "
' ': ,II
i :' 'f:
' , I : //
: ---+.,..\---__ - I
~_n_ , , ,
u,
,
,
,
,
~
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 69 of 153
/-Pese\emKay
-3ubJect:
Location:
Pre-app PUD - Michael Fernandez, Agent Kay Deselem, Planner
Conference Room "C"
Star!:
End:
Show Time As:
Wed 2/8/2006 830 AM
Wed 2/8/2006 9:30 AM
Tentative
Recurrence:
(none)
Required Attendees:
Not yet responded
CDS-C', DeselemKay; HillWes; wileLr; CasalanguidaNick; scott_d; mulier_r; weeks_d;
bedtelyonJ; AblerKenneth; ScamehornKelth; DeltoroZamira; jarrell_p; SawyerMichael;
BrowllAraqueSummer; seal_s
Meeting Status:
Pre-app PUD rezone - Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, 263-6934, representing Radio Road Joint Venture, Foiio Number
2716500258 and 27155001500, -GMP-FLUE-Density Rating System B. Urban Commercial District- Section 10.
Livingston/Radio Road Oommerclallnflll Subdistrict. 5,0+/ parcel to be deveioped with up to 50,000 sq. ft. commercial and
mayor may not include residential within a mixed use with up to 16 units/acre. The property Is located at the NW comer of
Radio Road and Livingston/4787 Radio Road and 4874 Market Avenue. The property is zOlled "I" Industrial.
-.
1
~~~ '"
t..( 0..- ?
,:)6 ,N '-
..;;2: ,0 )
.'"
c-L()O -
Il)t:-r-- r--
bIin; >. Ql 10 (l
Ctt::::ro Gl
~m:J (\, ~
";;
v co... e
('Q "-
,J3~ ~ <>::
.::J) I "
-:'t !1 u
~ '" " VJ
~ ill ~ a
~ ~ ! 5 ~
~ N n
~ f
~ ~ ~ ~ * -l
u. Jl.,
. J " "-
J j J I ~ ~ c
"
~ .~
~ ~
" .~ 0
c cRJ
DO Oil ~
rn a
~
g '>
~
c' '"
g 0
c,
rn 0
EO 6'--
2 v
" E
0
'" C
TI d}
0 4 >
o. --,
0 r::l
:J "'
m 0
Cl. " ~
~
~ -.
ill 0 .~
u ~ n
00
L. l'3:Z> ,0
~ c;;i!! 0'
o 11 "'"
.l-J E , ro
C .2 c:
ill :5 .S ,
E""~
> '6'- ,..,
- 0 ,0
2 . 0'
om 0
,j..J 0 '3
E~
.. TI~ 2:1
u ~.s;-
"E ~ 1\
ro E~ 2
0 8J'l
w. cc.
a:: "TI
Wlll K
,\!!:S 0.
0 ~ " '"
02
~ ro
U <-'
^ :=I
"
ro . ...
0. 0.
a:: 0
Ii: 0.
"
^ S
~ "
<3 "'-
m
~ S
8 .D
"
" :s
E
.. S
~ 0
u
c ..;
"
w d}
"~ '"
0 .~
~ i:l
'" 0.
" 0.
" i:l
0
0
Ii: '"
:.::i
~ '0
c
0 ()
0
u en
0. "~ }
'"
;;;; 7J ,
() '"
.@ ,; :::::
0 !
"
N
P.. @
,
"'.~'.-
.'
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 71 of 153
LANE PARK
COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD)
Growth Managemcnt Plan (GMP) Compliance Narrative; document date 06.01.06
The subject parcel is govemed by the Livin!!:ston / Radio Road Commercial lntill
Subdistrict of thc Collier County (OMP) Growth Management Plan; a copy is attached
to this document for ease of reference.
The explicit purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide services, including retail uses, to the
surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance of the subject property.
The proposed CPUD implements this purpose,
This OMP SubdistriGi listed a nmnber of restriction and conditions. These are being
implemented with the rezoning of thc subject property as proposed.
These restriction and conditions are:
1)
permitted and conditional uses are restricted to the permitted and conditional
land uses of C-3 commercial zoning district in effect in October 2004 with.
four exceptions. The proposed list of pennitted uses is consistent with or
more restrictive than this referenced list and is further consistent with or more
rcstrictive than the land uses by the current C-3 commercial district
Maximum commercial intensity is limited to 50,000 sf.
Commercial only maximum building height is 35 ft and up to three (3) stories.
Mixed use incorporating residential, up to an intensity of 16 Wlits per acre, is
permitted additional height of up to 45 ft and up to four (4) stories. The
proposed CPUD does not seek to incorporate a residential component and
therefore the additional height and story are not applicable.
Access to Livingston Road was restricted to a right-in I right-out and fuliher
restricted to the northern one-third of the frontage on Livingston Road; a
distance of 256 feet from the parcel's northern property line. The CPUD
Master Plan depicts a location within 200 feet and therefore is consistent with
this restriction.
2)
3)
4)
5)
PUl)Z-2006-AR-10376
PRO.TECT 112006020051
DATE: 8/28/06
KAY DRSELEM
.'
......."
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 200S
Page 72 of '153
(XIII)10, LJvln~stonlRadlo Road Commerciallnftll Subdistrict
This Subdistrict conslsts_+ 5.0 acres located at the northwest corner of the Intersection
of Livingston Road and Radio Roed.
'.
This Subdistrict allows for those permitted and conditional uses set forth in Commercial
Intermediate Zoning District (C.3) of the Callier County Land Development Code,
Ordinance 91-102, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict.
(Adopted October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004-71) However, the following
conditional uses shall not be permitted:
1. Amusements and recreation services (Groups 7911,7922 community theaters only,
7933, 7993, 7999 boat rental, miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental, I'ental
of beach chairs and accessories only.)
2. Homeless shelters, as defined by the Land Development Code.
3. Social Services (8322-8399)
4. Soup kitchens, as defmed by the Land Development Code.
To encourage mixed LiSe projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development
when located in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such
residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre;
the gross acreage of the project Is used in calculating residential density,
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to proVide services, Including retail uses, to
surrow1ding residential areas within a convenient travel distance to the SUbject property.
These uses are not an entitlement, nor Is the maximum density for residential uses in a
mixed-use building. Such uses, and residential density, will be further evaluated at the
time of rezoning approval to insure appropriateness in relation to surrounding properties.
The maximum development intensity allowed is 50,000 square feet of building area for
commercial uses with a maximum height of three (3) stories, not to exceed 35 feet.
However, for mixed use buildings - those containing residential uses over commercial
uses - the maximum height is four (4) stories, not to exceed 45 feet. Access to the
property within the Subdistrict may be permitted from Radio Road, Market Avenue and
Livingston Road, Any access to livingston Road shall be limited to the northern one-
third of the project's livingston Road frontage and shall be limited to rlght-ln, right-out
access. Further, access shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Manegement
Polley in effect at the.time of either rezoning or SDP application, whichever poilcy Is the
more restrictive,
II
;: it!!
H i~~,
['-I i h;~~ <1<""",,,",",,,,
i:l Frl.'~~...~/3\"~, ,-,~~~::
kl I T~~ ~O;-I\. ~':;:';'~,J .:~:- i '.
I~.I 1~1~ F r',------'\ut' y-I'.~/---
"-.[ r~ll..J.I 1/1 ~::' \ 'J
r i'i~H ~ ~ ,Ihlll;
I' I~,., u ". I j l~ I "
'.' . 'I 1.1 ~" 1 ~:I I
t I 11\ ~ I 'I I
I [C i,1 '" I l'
I,. Il~'. :==='~HZ.~;~M~.;_ 1!';
~ ~ ,
! I'~ ~f.tl(~~ 1 ~l~} P I
l ~h bon: ~ i ll'~~~ I
I I <:: III ~ I ~~3 \ -.
I 't ~:" 'l'~: !~i 1
,_~ ~ <l.; ,h1 I
h --~~----~ ~ - I'~ -~------- ---
~r [1 p ~ l:\1' j." :
" 8 ~ fl, "ljl~ I
~ -~6,h
I! l:j ,,~'
t--~-------- :
~ m
'I!
JI!
l ,---
Ii (
(:, h
1 ~
,0
r-
-[ill
f
,
,'. I
f' :
f: '
I I
[I I
t.! :
l;1
t;
(.j
H
, ,
1;
I':,
Ii
"-'
l.r
!"
;1
::l; :l;JI
'Ii ~~
i..t ~l!:f
I", !:~ !l~
tit ~u ~&A
iil'llll:!
i ~.. tp
",I 1;1
~ 1,1 1.1
:l~ !!l
~ r. j ~
',' I'
Ii! !~l, llllll
1~!I!!I!!%!!Hlp'1
~~~~: 5s:!~S~1a; ~:~~..
I
;[
li-
t; :I
" ,
iil!r !
~i,l:!,-",.,.".,) !
.."" "~,,-<<< ..~"",
.C.{l ~~Uu-"-'~"'.'~"<>'
(fvmr NO,f,,S't)Nltll'f
(18'<1 ~QO!l '!~"",'I
~ ~
II
hi!
,..
~
15
"
"
'"
~
'"
n
Hi!
~ ~ ~..~;I
~ i gr
i,. ~l:~'
.'....1 1
~ n ~Ii.
~ 8 8 <
< ~ ffi ~
I. 3 3" ,
I ~8 ~ k
.-,~.,...~~
~ j ! g'"
.
,-
I
Ii'
"I
ili
,., II
ii!l! ~ !l
!l,!l 1 II
~ i'! I '.
~ ill" '~!P
<.';l!!~<'i!ii
R~i~\ ~~h~
I,"!' }1
. Ill!! ",n
,1
d~
. .
m
11l.~~
"'Rp
ii?8~
i ·
J'A~
~<:..5'
Oi]
.
\
II
;,1
"
I
~i~""..,,'
e~~ .:"".,\l"'~.~~l:\-- T'~:_~::~ :~"~~!g
('''A).L<~l.~ __"..._ "'J.....--::'\'-.!"Ii '-.sH~ '!Jf' ""!"'~ I" "'"~"I'Ol~// .:
'. :-_~ ~ J: ~_L _- _ __ ::..:- _ __ =-____ ::. ~- -_ trL !l'
i. ,........... . ./
~ s: e'" -
lh '"i1
i
il
"
L
-~-'-~_..-
.~M_
.
"
.- ]
d
.-
'.
'"
-+~. , " ~
. "
g ~a
~E
~.
,
" ]~
"
."
~
"
,'\lJ'....<
"
~
gg - SlIi ':/d
I"l
~&
..,
tHi
'''1'
, ,
,
, -
"
"
"
..'
I.
..~"'-
,It<.,
"I
~ t.~
.,
.\, ~~
,i. i"
sv~".:...
"
"
"
,
..... 1."1 '. _ __..__=..ffIjJ ".!J'<I-.llL.$.I.C(
'.I...n..l....C""'i"
~'i/l
"~.. I
hi I
I
1
I
I
I.
I
'11 r
'J' . ~
t~
"
~
~
v-, ~S'fHd ')fHtfd NOJ.L:;naOlJd J.,LNflO,'J H3n10;;
'Cl '(J"d
1
~
: I
'0 i
ii"
~~~.~
:lli
i~~_
Il'i
j-li
d~..t::
__J
_.____ __~ :id.__
~ ".J
Ii!
,
< 0
, .
:'1:
!
" .
So: N.
~~. ti.a
. ,
~
"I
f
t
" :~
.{
.'.l!
,.
~
~
j
1
j."
':1
,
:i
.f
.~
I
'f
j
. ,1
'{
;~
:~
"~
....,:1.
','
.::.
.,
.'}.
J
-t,
f
~
I
I:
'\
Agenda Item No. 8A
.January 15, 2008
Page 74 of 153
Planning Development
Incorporated
Del'elopment Consultants, Engineers, Planners and Landscape Architects
5133 Castello Drive Suite 2 Naples, Florida 34103
239/263-6934,' Fax: 239/ 263-6981
PDi MRF @AGLeGM
MEMORANDUM & TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
( " -"'"--,-_..--
~,~'dxJ. {1;n!i crI-ofu. 2 PL IV\
-t!> :;Lkv~1:~-~I\\!6G,
Ms. Linda Bedtelyon . - 0 ( (~1~WV'
Community Planning Coordinator, I (1J))
Co/iier County Community Development and Environmental Services \ //
----~--
Date:
November 20, 2006
To:
Sent:
Via Courier
l?e:
Lane Park CPUO: NIM Notes
POI PII: 05.01044
Sender:
Susan M. Fariz, Project Coordinator
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE A 1-PAGE COVER SHEET, INCLUDING ENCLOSURES,
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 239/263-6934.
Dear Ms. Bedtelyon:
For your use and records, please find enclosed a copy of our notes for the Lane
Park CPUD Neighborhood Information Meeting as held on November 15, 2006,
along with the sign-in sheets and audio tape recording of the meeting,
As always, upon your receipt and review, should you have any questions or require
additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Thank you,
~htJY1. \W,)1r-Z
Cc; Ms. Kay Deselem, Principal 421clnner, Zoning and Land Development Review
Mr. John Wanklyn
,
'\
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 75 of 153
LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(CPUD)
AR#: 10376
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
November 15, 2006
SIGti.lN SI:lEET
PLEAse PRINT
I #
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE I FAX #'s I
1. Michael R Fernandez 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 239-263-6934
Plannina Development Incorporated Naples, Florida 34103 239-263-6981 fax
2. Terri Fernandez 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 239-263-6934
Plannina Develooment incorporated Naples, Florida 34103 239-263-6981 fax
3. Susan Fariz 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2 239-263-6934 ,
Planning Development Incorporated Naples, Fiorlda 34103 239-263-6981 fax
4. L1tJDA ~L'{1J0 GL-UEQ,C~ .
5. e r:J '" II e~l el fox~;'(e ---\1M <; )?()- 1 f 17
;;tfJ4tlfo f)j!~;eS 1
,,<JJ4:Y (JpJ:2.p:JJ!-.fW ~tJ"'.&- t43 -III f;>
SW'ptlV + f!.tJi/81:r C-OD,....c/ ,?"/Zv Fbmi-fC Cr . 'fblf- ?'0'/
,
'~genda Item No. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 76 of 153
Lane Park
Commercial Planned Unit Development
Neighborhood Information Meeting
Naples Municipal Airpol-t
November 15, 2006
5:30p,m.
Attendees:
Colli,~L~ounty:
Kay Deselem, Principal Planner, Zoning and Land Development Review
Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator, CDES Administration
Property Owner Agent Representatives:
Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, President, Planning Development lneorporated
Ten; Fernandez, Vice-President, Planning Development Incorporated
Susan Fariz, Project Coordinator, Planning Development Incorporated; meeting notes draftee! by;
This Neighborhood Infonnation Meeting began at 5:30 p.m. and ended at approx.imately 6:00 p.m.
Ms. Kay Deselem, Principal Planner, Zoning and Land Development Review of Collier County, opened the
presentation by introducing herself and Ms. Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator, as representatives of
Collier County. She explained that this meeting was the County required process created to allow for addition.
neighborhood involvement; and specifically for the agent for a devcloper, through their agent, Mr. Michael Femand"
in this case, to share information about the proposal for Lane Park.
She explained that she is the planner assigned to the pctition as it goes through the review and public hearing process.
She explained that the applicant is required to record the meeting, as was done. She explained that if the petitioner
makes a commitment during the evening, it must be on record and may be made a requirement for approval. She
ex.plained that there will be two or more public hearings. She further explained that no decisions would be made during
this meeting.
Me. Fernandez eXplained that this project is a relatively modest proposal within approximately 5.27 acres, and is a
rezone from Industrial to Commercial Planned Unit Development. Mr. Fernandez noted that a Growth Management
Plan Amendment was approved just a few years ago which created a Subdistrlct that governs the subject property and
which allows for up to 50,000 square feet of commcrcial and up to 16 units per acre for residential.
He then reviewed the proposed CPUD Conceptual Master Plan. Note was made of the extensive number and acreage
of the drainage easements, the access points, and the location of the proposed crcated preserve. It was also pointed out
that the graphic depiction of general circulation Was not specific relative to building placcment. Setbacks and building
heights were then discussed; 3 stories and 35 ft of zoned height and setbacks of 50 ft from Livingston Road and 25 ft
from Radio Road,
He explained that the eonceptual site plan depicts access from Livingston Road in the northern one/third of the site,
and that it is limited to a right-in and right-out with no proposed median cuts. Thc Radio Road access is existing.
Page 1 of2
,.
.
.,
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 77 of 153
~
\.
He explained that there would be notification by the County to property owners residing within 500 feet of the
proposed Lane Park CPUD relative to dates for the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County
Commissioners meetings. He also noted that public notification signs would be placed on site, at three locations:
Livingston Road, Radio Road, and Market Street
He then advised that approximately 200 notices for this neighborhood information meeting were mailed. It should be
noted that four (4) individuals from the public attcnded this meeting.
The presentation was concluded and a rew handouts of the proposed permitted uses and development standards were
handed out and those atteuding werc tllen invited to ask qucstions andJor provide comment.
The following were gencral inquiries that were discussed:
+ Buffers; LDC buffers lire proposed
+ Number of buildings; the plan and proposal were uot specific to the number
+ Type of structure (concrete, metal, otc); that the County Architectural Design Standards would govern
The meeting was closed after a few fmal comments by County Planner Kay De.elem rcgarding the process,
emphasizing that the proposal is subject to change as the process moves forward and the dates for public hearing are
tentativc and also subject to change, and encouraged continued follow up by interested ncighbors,
End of Meeting Notes.
Page 2 on
Agenda Item No. 8A
january 15. 2008
Page 78 of 153
LANE PARK
COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD)
EIS Introductory NalTativc; document date 06.01.06; revised 11.29,06
Attached is the previously submitted EIS which was utilized in the processing of the prior
GMP Amendment The native vegetation suppOlied by the site which is not encurnbered
by eascments is 3,01 acres. The prcscrvation requirement per the LDC is ] 0% of parcels
of less than 5 acres and 15% for parcels between 5 and 20 acres. The subject parcel is
just over the 5 acre threshold, .At 15% the requirement is 0,45 acrcs.
The viable layout of the subject parcel must consider a number of challenges which
include but are not limited to:
Preservc Requirement:
Minimum dimensional requirements for preserves:
Buffers between preserves and other parcellimprovement areas:
For Principal Uses
For Certain Accessory Uses
The setbacks / buffers increase the size of the preserve
and its surrounds from 0.48 acres to a rangc of
The parcel is encumbered by fivc drainage and right-of-way
easements which range in width from
Parcel configuration / geometry is vcry linear with widths of;
And the referenced easements separate the parcel into
two areas with the northern portion of restricted dimension
limited to viable use for crcated preserves and storm
water management
Access to / from Livingston Road is limited by the GMP to the northern
256 feet south o~ Market Avenue.
0.45 acres
20 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft
0.75 to ].0 acres
lOft to 50 ft.
173 ft and 298 ft
A quick graphic analysis was made to aid in formulating the most viable preservation
strategy; see attached graphic.
Since the j'esulting preserve requirement yields an area of less than one-half acre, it can
provide its preservation rcquirement in the form of created preserves subject to the
following Planting Criteria, copied from the LDC:
llECf.fVEtl
DEe 1 4 2006
1
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 79 of 153
ii. Required Planting Criteria:
(a) Where created preserves are approved, the landscape plan shall re-create a
native plant community in all three strata (ground cover, shrubs and trees), utilizing
larger plant materials so as to more quickly re-create the lost mature vegetation. Such
re-vegetation shall apply the standards of section 4.06.05 C. of this Code, and include the
following minimum sizes: one gallon ground cover; seven (7) gallon shrubs; fourteen
(14) foot high trees with a seven foot crown spread and a dbh (diameter at breast height)
of three inches. The spacing of the plants shall be asfollows: twenty to thirty foot on
center for trees with a small canopy (less than 30 ft. mature spread) andforty foot on
center for trees with a large canopy (greater than 30ft. mature spread), ftve foot on
center for shrubs and threefoot on centerfor ground covers. Plant material shall be
planted in a manner that mimics a natural plant' community and shall not be maintained
as landscaping. Minimum sizes for plant material may be reducedfor scrub and other
xeric habitats where smaller size plant material are betler suitedfor re-establlshment of
the native plant community,
(b) Approved created preserves may be used to recreate:
(1) not more than one acre of the required preserves if the property has less than
twenty acres of existing native vegetation.
(2) not more than two acres of the required preserves if the property has equal to or
greater than twenty acres and less than eighty acres of existing native vegetation.
(3) not more than 1 0% of the required preserves if the property has equal to or
greater than eighty acres of existing native vegetation.
(c) The minimum dimensions shall apply as set forth in 3.05,07HJb.
(d) All perimeter landscaping areas that are requested to be approved to fulfill the
native vegetation presen'e requirements shall be labeled as preserves and shall comply
with all preserve setbach
The resulting generalized preserve location is superior:
. as it can be well separated and buffered from the onsitc development;
. as it is compatible with adjacent, sUlTounding drainage easements which are
pervious and landscaped; and therefore environment is greatly extended and
associated benefits are significantly increased,
. as it results in a preservation configuration which is generally compact and
therefore with limited perimeter,
2
<(0000 (j c;
000'" "" .9-15
.o~ ~~ o '.
ON_ .51:::u (j
Z ,0 ct~'" e
~~o c:;~ <c
_ 00 lie:, o<>::~ ~;:;
22:'a> -I"J . i!:' [5
-roOJ ....~ . ~Cl ci!!;:
co"ro 15" l(jt>:i:'s t>:
'0 co.. <c
cro ~~~ '-'-"- II",
QJ-, bl6Js ....~ ~
Ol ",-J
<( Sl..J<: <c"':::t 15(j bl"
ocol"J L.j:s- ~Cl!Jl
~~B~ "'",;;'; ::,;
~<>:::::t !l: -JI'-: [5<>::
"':;,<::<C ~~~ :3"'15 el~~
"'0 L.j O<!l:::t ~~ ,.
<:",?;:", ~ ~e ~~""I"J !Jltl
i:'s~:::t~ '" CVj
"'- "'i5<:l:i 13fi
~~~B ~ el:i <:",>.", b3
"'-'" ~~~~
Vj '" '"
~~~~ bl ~ '"
~~"'LU
2 .
, ................. " .... '... .... .....
o ...........,...,.....................
. ,.... I....... W... """ ..0..........,
........ I.. "........,..............,
520'
"-
~
:;,:>-
~!ll!
tl::
e:,J..I2tl::c;j
",c<:LiJu
<:I~~t>:
"'...."'::>0':
!Q?,3Vl<'>
~5:i:515i:'s
f;)
~
'"
::J
North Access Locatio
ClY021 NO.LSfJNlMI
-~
all
fl
~
145'
~ 1.15~
l1~h~~
cO; ~
E'
---!if--------
. .
: ~ ~
l ~ ~
. <.>! l
LJ-_n____
~
~ I
~
"
!
!
.
.
!
!
w." .,.1 "t1 '11"1
_ Y-1 8&YHJ ':n1t'd NOl.I:JnaOIlJ )..lNIjO:J l!:l1T1otJ
PRESERVE STUDY OPPORTUNITIES
GRAPHIC DATE 06.07.06; revised 77.29.06
STUDY BY: PDI
. 1
II
'I'
].~
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 81 of 153
Environmental Assessment Report
of
Livingston Road-Radio Road
Conlmercial Infill Sub-District 5.27 ac. Lot
Sec. 36, T49S, R25B
Radio Road and Livingston Road, Collier County, FL
April15,2003
Revised: Apri127, 2005
Prepared for:
'"
Hole, Monte" Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naple" Florida 34] 10
Tel: (239) 254-2000 Fax: (239) 254-2099
Conducted by:
Geza Wass de Czege, President
Southern Biome" Inc., Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901
Tel: (239) 334-6766 Fax: (239) 337-5028
----~.._~-~.._~._--,~--_......,-,-
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, F'L 33901 - Mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994
TeL (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President Fax: (239) 337-5028
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 82 of 153
Livingston Rd. - Radio Rd. Commercial Infill Sub-District Lot
Section 36, T49S, R25E
Radio Road, Collier County, FL
Location Map
':...,..""'~....._"
~""",~~Q,,"_T _
'~~~~Fd" "
~.."""jY;',.,... _ ~#.l
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave" Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph, (239) 334.6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President FAX (239) 337.5028
EAS Report for Livingston Rd.-Radio Rd. Commerciallnflll Sub-District 5.27 ac. Lot, Sec. 39, T49S, R25E,
Radio Road and Livingston Road Ex!. Collier County, FL Revised Date; April 27, 2005
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 85 of 153
Fish, Wildlife, Listed Species and tbeir Habitats
Pursuant to paragraph 4.1.1 (a), an applicant must provide reasonable assurances that a regulated
activity will not impact the values of wetland and other surface water functions so as to cause
adverse impacts to:
(a) the abundance and diversity of fish, wildlife and listed species; and
(b) the habitat of fish, wildlife and listed species.
In evaluating whether an applicant provided reasonable assurances under subsection 4.2.2,
deminimis effects shall not bc considered adverse impacts for the purposes of this subsection,
Response: An endangered species survey was conducted on March 20,2003, and again an update
was conducted on March 8, 2005. On both site surveys, no listed of endangered or
threatened species were observed on the subject property. The following 'describes the
survey methodology and results.
Endanllered Species Survey Methodolol!V:
The entire project site has been field surveyed for endangered species using a modification
of the transect line methods established by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
(FWC). The modified survey methodology has proven effective in covering 90-95% of the sites
surveyed. The modified strip census uscs meandering transect lines at 75' - 100' intervals. The
meanders extcnd into adjoining transect lines to provide a near 100% coverage, TIle frequency of
the meanders is determined by the ground cover and visibility. More densely vegetated areas
receive a greater frequency of meanders, thus decreasing the area between meanders in some
habitats to as nears as 12' apart. If the terminus flagging markers of the transect lines me not
visible, then survey flagging tape is attached to vegetation at the outer cxtent of the transect
meanders to mark the coverage area for that transect. The visibility of the flagging tape assists in
maintaining the transect direction, and is used as a gauge for determining the frequency of meanders
within a transect area, Each tape must be visible from the previous meandcr. On the subsequent
transects, the flagging tape is removed and relocated at the outer limits of its transect area.
Faunal species which do not lend themselves to the typical transect line survey methodology
typically used for determining stationary floral and faunal species, require an additional method of
observation. These species can be best observed by using game stalking techniques and periodic
observations with field glasses at frequent intervals along transect lines, The frequency and
- 4-
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 86 of 153
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Bo> 50640. Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334.6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President FAX (239) 337.5028
EAS Report for Livingston Rd,-Radio Rd. Commerciallnfill Sub-District 5.27 ac, Lot, Sec. 39, T49S, R25E,
Radio Road and Livingston Road Ex!. Callier County, FL Revised Date: April 27 .2005
duration of observations are determined by habitat density, species observed, and the stalking skills
of the observer. The ability to blend into the surroundings is another key requirement for success.
Any species observed were noted on an aerial photograph as to location and number of
species sighted. Species presence and abundance on a given site cannot be determined for all
species listed, Therefore, fauna which are mobile, transient, or deceptive are not always observed
during a typical field survey such as required by Collier County. This is especially tme for species
abundance. Therefore, the status of each species is listed as to presence and numbers observed, and
those species which can be reasonably surveyed for abundance are provided with such data.
Habitats Surveyed:
llik
193
411
423
510
510R
Endangered Species Observations:
De..liicriotion
Open, Undeveloped Land
Pine-Bracken Fern Forest
Pine-Cypress-Laurel Oak Forest
Swale
Roadside Swale
Observed
Soecies
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
Bclow are listed species that are typically expected to be observed within the habitats
"
identified on the project site,'or similar habitats within Collier County. Observation notcs and
comments are made on each species.
Endangered Species Expected to be Observed all Similar Habitats
UPLAND SPECIES:
Common Name
Eastt:.m indigo snake
gopher tortoise
gopber frog
S' eaSlern Arnerlclln Kestrel
American bald eagle
Burrowing owl
Leas! tern
Fox ::;qllirrel
twistc:d air plant
Florida coontie
Red-cockaded woodpecker
Scientific Name
Drymarchon corais cOllperi
Gopherus pol)phemus
RanG Qrco{ata
fa/co sparverius paulus
Haliae/lts lel1cocephalilS
Speotylo cunivularia
Sterna antillarum
Scillrw; niger
Tillandsiajic?Xl/Osa
Zamia Floridal1o
Picoides borealis
Ob,.
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
nO
no
- 5-
Comments
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
~
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mall to: P.O, Box 50640, Fort Myers. FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334,6766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239) 337-5028
EAS Report ror Livingston Rd.-Radio Rd. Commerciallnfill Sub-District 5.27 ac. Lot, Sec. 39, T49S, R25E.
Radio Road and Livingston Road Ex!. Collier County, FL Revised Date: April 27, 2005
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 87 of 153
Endangered Species Expected to be Observed on Similar Habitats (cont.)
WETLAND SPECIES:
Common Name
American alligator
Ellstern indigo snake
Little blue heron
Snowy egret
Tricolored heron
Whitelhis
Wood stork
Everglades mink
Scientific Nftme
Alligator mississippiensis
Drymarchon corals couper;
Egretta caerulea
Egretta tllU!a
Egrctta tricolor
Eudocimus albus
MycJcria amerlcana
MusJela vision evergladensis
Obs_
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
Comments
not observed
nOlobserved
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
inappropriate habitat
Discussion and Conclusion:
~
As previously noted, no endangered, threatened, or species of special concern were observed on the
property during either of the two event listed species surveys. Special attention was given to the
fox squirrel and red cockaded woodpecker in the pine forested areas, and to the gopher tortoise in
the open, undeveloped areas. Because the area is completely isolated from all other undeveloped
natural areas, and is surrounded by major roadways on three sides and commercial development on
the fourlh, it is considered unsuitable habitat for any listed species to forage or nest, and as
expected, none were observed.
'"
~
- 6-
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 89 of 153
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services .
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - Mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994
Tel: (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President Fax: (239) 337-5028
-,
Livingston Rd.-Radio Rd. Commercial Intill Sub-District Lot
Section 36, T49S, R25E, Radio Road, Collier County, FL
-
r
....-'"
Soils Map
Ii Ill! . lfJ\ ...
II .... <."'.
II. ~ . .
.. .'" .';....,.
... : '. .11.'..... .
.... ; ".'. rII . !II
... II :;. II,. -", I
.. .. __ II
.-. ~ ~ ..
.. ',: lIIlI
.. . '.'11
.'~~ I III 1:.,1.. ......'.: 1'.,.,11
-wi
!II L' I~.
.. ."-"".'
II ......
~ II ""'''''1 I... !II_
iRIl ....-- mil III - II' II
.. II . 41. ,,11I.,11.
-III IIlI .~.. ... 11II
III .. II ., II III III III. I
111II111 .111___..11I
_II . 11_. II
Ii IIIIDI
...
Soils Legend
Code
27
38
Description
Holopaw fine sand, sloughs
Urban land-Matlacha-Boca complex
1:. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
13881 PlANTATIdi:'IS'1.'o~!0I1I,1,53
FORT MVERS,Fl33912.4339
OFFICE 239.278,]090
FAX 23g,27B.1906
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN
,
MEMORANDUM
.
TO:
Mr. Michael Fernandez
PImming Dcvclopment Incorporated
FROM:
Robclt L. Price, FE
Senior Transportation Consultant
Ted g, Treesh
President
f)^ TE:
February 13, 2007
RE:
Lane Park CPUD
Collier County, Florida
TR TranspOltation Consultants has received the second set of review comments from the
Collier County TranspOltation Planning Division in regards to the above rcfcrenced
project. The comments and our response arc listed below for your reference.
11S Comments 1/16/07:
1. Intersecfion Analysisfor Radio Road @ Livingston Road: The report
Indicates that the pmject trips will be significantly impacting Radio Road
segment west of Livingston Roael. The project will be adding 70 l~ft-turn and
40 V-turn trips on the north approach of this intersection and 85 V-turn tn])s
on the west approach. The exisllng peak season TMC (Exhibit 5) hw been
projectedfor 20]] (Exhibil 6) using growth rates but the BuildoU/ Trafjic
(Exhibit 7) for 2011 shows 2006 TMC plus the pl'rJjectlrqfjic. The
il1tersection has been analyzedfor 2006 and not JOlltalaltraffic. SYNCIJRO
analysis shows the intersection will experience major failure and will require
significant improvements. Please see attached SYNCHRO outpul.
The analysis contained in the previous response has been corrected. It should be noted
that discllssions were held with Mr. Nick Casalanguida, and a 5.0% annual growth rate
was agreed upon for Livingston Road rather than the abnormally high growth rate
indicatcd within the Collier County Traffic Count Report Figures 5, 6, & 7 have been
adjusted and attached to the end of this document for reference. It should also be noted
- "t.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 91 of 153
Mr. Michael Femandez
February 13, 2007
Lane Park CPUD
Page 2
that Figures 6 and 7 have been updated to rcflect 2012 traffic conditions rather than 2011
conditions. Table 1 ^ was also revised to reflect 2012 conditions.
As a result of the updated turning movement figures, the intersection analysis was revised
to reflect the new 2012 buildout traffic conditions. The resultant intersection analysis
results are attached to the end of this document for refcrence. Level of Service
deficiencies were only shown at the Livingston Road/Radio Road intersection during the
PM peak hour. The Developer has agreed to pay the project's proportionate share for
applicable operational Level of Service deficiencies which are not covered by Impact
Fees and which are required by applicable LDC provisions tor SOP applications as
evaluated and determined at the time of SOP application.
2. Truck Factorsfor Intersection Analysis: The HeS analysis shows 0% jar
truck.l. A minimum qf 2% trucks should be usedfor all analysis including
SYNCHRo.
A 2% truck factor was shown for the SYNCHRO anal)'sis at Livingston Road and Radio
Road. No truck factor is shown in the HCS+ intersection analysis at the sile access
driveways. HCS+ only considers truck factors on the side streets and left tUl11ing
movements at unsignalized intersections. Since no significant truck traffic is expected as
a part of the subject site, it is not appropriate to consider a truck factor on the site access
approaches. Additionally, no left tums are proposed at the site acceSS driveways.
Therefore, [10 truck factor has been added on the side streets,
3. Access Mallagement: Although Tra/1.\porta/ioll Division concedes that the
existing access on Radio Road may remain in it's re.\I,ective location as
shown on the master plan, IIlterconnection with westerly a/lUlla is still
required.
Interconnection is not shown to the westerly abutter dllC to a drainage ditch that is located
along the western property boundary. Please see Planning Development Inc. 's response
to this comment under separate cover,
4. Imp"ct fees are for increases in capacity only, not operational improvements.
The required "Fair Share" contributior1s no/ed in thefzrs/ review addresses
operational impacts to the intersection 'if Radio and Livings/on, and remain a
requirement ~fthis review. Ther~f'ure, the Transportation Divisioll reiterates
thatlhe PUD language must contain ''fair share" colltribution language
relative to improvements at Livingston Rd and Radio Rd intersection.
The Developer has agreed to pay a "propm1ionate share" of any operational
improvements which are required by applicable LOC provisions for SOP applications.
These operational improvements, if any, will be evaluated at the lime of SDP for the
subject site. It is not appropriate to deem proportionate share payments at the time ofre-
zoning when sites are being analyzcd for "worst case" trip generation scenarios.
Regardless, the proposed re-zoning of the Lane Park CPUD will actually reduce the
impacts on the wbject site based on the current zoning available on the subject site. For
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 92 of 153
Mr. Michael Fernandez
February 13, 2007
Lane Park CPUD
Page 2
instance, the subject site could currently be developed to consist of a 75,000 square foot
retail strip center L\llder the existing zoning. The proposed re-zoning of the site will limit
the square footage to 50,000 square feet of commcrcial uses. The trip generation
difference in a 75,000 square foot commercial use and a 50,000 square foot commcrcial
use are indicated within Table 1 below.
Table 1
Trip Generation
ExistinQ Zoning vs. Proposed Re-Zonillg
Status Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekd." P,M, Peak Hour Dally
ln Out Total In Out Total (2-wav)
Existing Zoning Shopping Centet 80 . 50 130 250 270 520 5,635
(75000 ;". R.l
Shopping Centel ,,-
Propused Re-Zoning- (50.00050. n.l 65 40 105 190 205 395 4,330
Trip Difference +15 +10 +25 .60 +65 fl25 +1,305
lExistinil Z{lniil~ - pronosed Rc.Zonhll')
As can be seen within Table I, the proposed re-zoning of the Lane Park CPUD to limit
thc commercial floor area on the site to 50,000 square feet would actually reduce the
traffic impacts of the site.
Should you have additional questions/comments, please feel free to contact me.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 93 of 153
APPENDIX
Ag.enda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 94 of 153
TABLEIA
<(OOC') 1: ,.
.: w
roO'" ~
.o~ L ~ ~ ifl '" '"
-""J _ ~ '" ~
~ ~ ,.
0 i!l < ~
en " >
en <
22 Co>
ell'" ~
ell "ell ~ >- ~I 0 ~ ~
-0 Co. ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~
Cell '" ~ w W
0>"" ~ ~ t 0
0> ~ ~ < ~ ~
<( w <i ~ ~I ~ ~ ~
~ i!l
~ " 1:
z
'" ~ I! ~ ~
~ " ~ -' ~ :g
" ~ 0 N N
\l '"
w <
CO ~ "
~ ~
~I '"
l/) N '!; ,- ~ ~ "
~ " ~ il
>- " ~ i!l ~
...J ~ " .
<: l ,
Z ;i ~I t iF
u
<( ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
~ 0
z ~ ,- ~ .
>- :i ~ ~ ~ '" E
t) " , .\1.
.
z ~ &
W >- ~I ~ .
. Z ~ '" 0 . "
0:: '" " g . ~
Q '" <<> '" n
0:: 0 '" " ;!: ~ ~ '"
N
::I ~ ~ E .~
" .
Z t) E .
Q . 5
Z m
>- ~ ~ . E
""" 0 ~ z . ~
t) t) ~ z ~ 0 Q , .
0 i < ~ ~ ~
W '" ~ ~ N ~ ~ il' E
01:1 " 0 r
0:: " ~
is <( 0 .
<( 0:: c ~
~ " !l ~
.... W '"
W <( a g " " " " " ". " " .
..J W I- " 9 z ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ . 8 ;;
0. 0:: ~ < '" ,; N '" ,; N . ~
Dl >- .
<( .t) ~ 0
0::1- E
""" . .
::It) >- ~ ~I ~ ~ i!l ;; ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~
0<( " N ~ ~ E
w g ~ ~
:1:0. 0 ~
~ ~ 0 :li '" ~I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 i!l j .
~ n N N ~
<( ~ ~
I- " "
w Ii t; . .
0. Z " " ~I , 0
<: >- >- w w ~ '" , ~ " " . ~
:J :J " ~ 0 ~. ~ ~ ~ ,
t) 0 0 III 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~
'" .
u:: ~ ~ , ~
" "
Z ! 0
0 -0 .
l!) 0 1- .~ .
~ ~ " ..
Vi ~ 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 ~ ,
0 M 0 0 0 :l . . ~
~ :i N :; 0 0 0 N );
~ ~ M . . . N N ~
~ >- .~ ~
0 00
Il> . ,;
. n .~
~ ~ ~I .
u II
0 '3 0 '3 S S S 0 0 0'
M r r c ~ ~ ~ c 0
. ~ "- '" w w w w ~ . . . :5 oc
~ ~ > . c
0 . 0
M 0 ~ >- "
~ ~ . Q
N Z ~ ,
~ 91 . ~ " :li ~ ~ ~ 0 " "?
~ ~ ~ ~ >- , ~
" . 0
w ~ ,
~ ~
" , ~
u " .f . ~
~ u: '" "
~ ~ ~ 8 .
g < " " ~
~ ~ ~ ';
. 0 ~ .
>- >- " " " " ~ c . .
~ '"
u " a: a: 0 a: '5 Q
'" w ij 0 . . 0 Q ~
~ a .. ~ ~ . c 0 ..
" .~ :5
~ {i & .~ :5 > "
a: '" a: '" . Ii
"- ~ ffi ~ \l " " " ~ " '0 J
~ ~ . .
:J :J '" z' vi " " " " .. '" ~ ~
0 0 ,. >- >-
r r
~ ~ '3
"- ~
" " ,. ~ 1l
< "- ~ , Ii
J J ~ t
< 5 c " 0
~ . I ~
0 0
>- ... " ~
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 96 of 153
FIGURES 5, 6, & 7
~
~
'"
-- 8
L
MARKET AVENUE
-----..
.
I
I.
I
I
I
Ss
<X> <X>
"'en
~-
00
t;;~
,~
(810) 325.1'
(1,490) 315-+
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
153
ci
0:
Z
g
(/)
~
z
'>
:i
'\. 880 (455)
... 1,455 (525) RADIO ROAD
LEGEND
... 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
... (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
- INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS
R 2006 PEAK SEASON TURNING MOVEMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
CONSULTANTS,INC. LANE PARK CPUD Figure 5
MARKET AVENUE
"
-i
<>
8
u.
I
I
I
I
I
I
------
_it)
"'~
,~",
I'- -
~~
Lf>:t;
to",
1'-...
~....
(980) 395;-
(1,800) 380+
ci
n:
z
o
f-
(1)
19
Z
:;
:::;
Agenda Item No. SA
r\l 5, 2008
age j 53
~ 1,065 (550)
.. 1,760 (635) RADIO ROAD
LEGEND
.. 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
.. (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
- INDtCATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS
R 2011 BACKGROUND TURNING MOVEMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
CONSULTANTS,INC. LANE PARK CPUD Figure 6
v
~
g
<D
o
LL
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
MARKET AVENUE
J
I
iOl
2!.1
~ I'\, 50 (150)
~ 1+2,525 (1,410)
(2,865) 800....
8
<J)
o
~N
0-
"'0
-N
"'N
~ .
~
~+
------
(110)25"\. +
o
f'-
....
~
8
f'-
"'.
~
~'"
",,,,,
f'-<'1
t::-~..: 6'
~ ...
"'0 -
IDc- 0
; \.~~
(85) 25"
(980) 395 :I'
(1,800) 380....
Agenda Item No. SA
.2008
3
ci
cr:
z
o
I-
rJ)
o
z
:>
:J
'\, 1,065 (550)
+ 1,785 (700) RADIO ROAD
LEGEND
+ 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
.. (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
- INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS
2011 BUILD-OUT TURNING MOVEMENTS
LANE PARK CPUD
Figure 7
Agenda Item No. SA
january 15, 2008
Page 100 of 153
HCS+ INTERSECTION CAPACITY
ANALYSIS
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 101 of 153
LIVINGSTON ROAD@ RADIO ROAD
~6v~ftiento/JH>~,~{;~~~.~0t~;;:'.F'F5\l!aWWg~~; ~su~.~eem:~z:EWait~:'~.WBR~.'};t;$B,Wf;.~{\~r$:B_W,%~'{.f$a.F.fi:1~~'i~~it~~1iJ~[~E0.;~;%;r;';l~r~~~~1!ff.~~i'(F~;?
Lane Configurations ~1j H H l' ~1j 1'1'
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Totai LostUme (5) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Utll. Factor 0.97 0.95 095 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 2787
Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 100 0.95 1.00
Said. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 2787
Volume (vph) 25 395 380 1785 1065 10 470 765
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.95. 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 27 416 400 1879 1121 11 495 805
RTOR Roduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 270 0 0 280
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 443 400 1879 851 0 505 525
Turn Type Prot prqt Perm Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 8 5
Actuated Graen, G (s) 12.5 53.0 45.0 45.0
Effective Green, 9 (s) 14.0 55.0 47.0 47.0
Actuated 9/C Rallo 0.16 0.72 0.52 0.52
Clearance Time (5) 5,5 6.0 6.0 5.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 534 2556 1848 827
vis RalloProt cO.13 0.11 0.53
vis Ratio Perm
vIe Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
tncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Se rvice
Approach Delay (5)
Approach LOS
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Livingston Rd @ Radio Rd
~
..f
-
+-
'-
0.83
36,8
1,00
13.9
50.7
D
cO.54
1.03
21,5
1.00
38.8
60.3
E
0.16
3.9
1.00
0.1
4,0
A
28.6
C
1.02
21.5
1.00
25.2
46.7
D
51.8
D
Jf:!ier$.~p\iQrl;i$ umm~~tY~i'~f;'iii,;~,~~~~V~):t~~:€&.~ft~BW.1;~h\\fl.;'1~i\t'k\~~;~:l {~.<-<i;';-:;8/0':<.-~'~>!1";~(f;: ;. ! L. .; . .
HCM Average Control Deley 50.9 HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99
Acluated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of 1051 time (5)
lntersectlon Capacity Utilization 98. 'I % leU Level of Service-
Analysis Period (mln) 15
o Critical Lane Group
LJ.
\. ,.I
15.0
17.0
0.19
6.0
648
6
15.0
17.0
0.19
6.0
526
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 102 of 153
2012 AM Buildout
218/2007
,<' , " ..,-:., ;':.:'ii~~1J{Wk;,iH~.~::;&t~:W;{f:'1i~t4H~'W~_tk;~;,d:}~
0.15
0.78
34.7
100
9.1
43.8
D
63.2
E
cO.19
1.00
36.5
1.00
38.9
75.3
E
D
12.0
F
Lane Park CPUD
TR TransportaUon Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
&\Q~erH;efjttJJ~{~:~;;;;\~&!.1l.~r~f~~~~~~e:ellJ}t1~~1:e~W1L;lit-lSa~W4~WJ~~{\ffi~JaB..~~S-am~R}:.~t:$aW,~:.K~S~BR1t~'~~.~fif.~~fti~:~;t4t{i{t:j<~~\t{*tr.g~.i*j;~~t~>>'
Lane Conflgurations :1"'1 H H ff l:i"l TIff
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Utll. Faclor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.88
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Said. Flow (prol) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 2787
FII Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Said. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 2787
Volume (vph) 85 960 1800 700 550 40 1385 775
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.02 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95
Ad). Flow (vph) 92 1032 1695 737 579 43 1458 816
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 451 0 0 278
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1124 1895 737 128 0 1501 536
Turn Type Prot. prot Perm Perm Perm
Protected Phases 7 7 4 6 6
Permitted Phases 6 -- 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 77.0 27,0 27.0
Effective Green,g (5) 48.0 79.0 29.0 29.0
Actuated glC Ralio 0.31 0.53 0.19 0.19
Clearance Time (5) 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Lene Grp Cap (vph) 1053 1864 684 306
vis Ratio Pro! cO.33 cO.54 0,21
vIs Ralio Perm
vie Ratio
Uniform Delay. d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay. d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
HeM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Livingston Rd @ Radio Rd
~
'-
lJ.
/
-
-
61.0
63.0
042
6.0
1442
1.07
52.0
1.00
47.6
99.6
F
1.08
60.5
1,00
57.2
117.7
F
91.1
F
0.08
042
53.1
1.00
4.2
57.3
E
1.02
35.5
1.00
25.1
60.6
E
75.\
E
\.
.;
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 103 of 153
2011PM Buildout
218/2007
lilf&f~:~ol{Qit:Sllmma'fY;~,~t~K :l;'~:'i~;,'8~';::, "i{l;1';",::ijt.l'~\~1~t:!{J.:;:;,.tijl::;:~~:~.~;::~i;!t~~:(';)iX:i:Yt5~~;~~},';1tJ~;~~~;jlj~~t~;,~;W~~;;;~Y-'f;1{i_:::<:;'{!fr:,~,$-\~1:~~~::~..\\:,~';'.~\; :",i~~:;~)!iU1{.;(~..;;it.'Si
HCM Average Control Del.y 73.8 HCM Level of Service E
HCM Voiume to Cep.city r.1io 1.03
Actuated Cycle Lenglh (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (0) 6.0
IntArseclion CapacRy Utiliz.ation 100.4% leu Level of Service G
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
6
61.0
:63.0
0,42'
6.0
\17\
0.44
\.04
43.5
\.00
35.1
78.6
J::
62,4
E
0.19
0.46
31.3
\.00
1.3
32.6
C
Lane Park CPUD
TR TranBponation ConsullantB, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
RADIO ROAD @ SITE ACCESS
Agenda Item No. 8A
january 15, 2008
Page 104 of 153
Agenda Item No. 8A
,. '~rv 1 ~ ?(1{1Q
. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Page 105 of 153
~nerallnformation Site Information
jjVst RLP Intersection Site Access /0) Radio Rd
"oencvICo. TR Transoortation Consultants Jurisdiction Colliar Countv
Date pertormed 2/6/2007 'i\nalvsis Year Bulldout
Analvsis Time Period lAM Peak Hour
Proiect DescrJOlion F0604.14-Lene Park CPUD
EastlWest Street: Radio Road North/South Street: Site Access
Intersection Orientation: East-West Studv Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/hl 800 2525 50
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourl~tow Rate, HFR 0 842 0 0 2657 52
vehlh
Percent Heavy Vehicies 0 -- -- 0 .- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized -- 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Uostream SiOnal . 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
lume Ivehlli) 15
. "ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Houriy Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 15
(Veh/hl
Percent Heavv Vehlcies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Fiared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
Configuration R
Delav, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (vehlh) 15
C (m) (vehlh) 148
vie 0.10
95% queue length 0.33
Control Delay (slveh) 32.0
LOS 0
Approach Delay (slveh) -. -- 32.0
Approach LOS - -- 0
opyrigh\ lC 2005 University of Florida, All Rl~hls Reserved
HGS+ ™ Version 5.2 .
Genarated: 2/8/20G7 t2:44 PM
Agenda Item No. 8A
10' r\l 1 ~ ?nnA
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Page 106 of 153
General Information Site Information .
Analyst RLP Intersection Site Access @ Radio Rd
Agencv/Co. TR Transportation Consultants Uurisdlctlon Collier Countv
Date Pertormed 2/6/2007 ItInalysis Year Buildout
Analvsls Time Period PM Peak Hour
Proiect Description f0604. 14-Lane Park CPUD .
East/West Street: Radio Road North/South Street: Site Access
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudv Period {hrs): 0.25
lVehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
volume (veh/hl 2865 1410 150
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 3015 0 0 1484 157
veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- - 0 -- --
Median Tvpe Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Upstream Sional 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
!Volume (veh/h) 95
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 100
I'veh/h)
Percent Heavv Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 . 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0 .
RT Channelized 0 . 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
Configuration R
Delav. Queue Length, and Levol of Service
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (vehfh) 100
C (m) (veh/h) 363
vie 0.28
95% queue length 1.10
Control Delay (s/veh) 18.6
LOS . C
Approach Delay (slveh) .. .. 18.6
Approach LOS. -- -- C
Copyrighl (0 2005 UnIversIty of Florida, All RighI!> Resef1Jed
HCS+ ™ Version 5.2
Generalf.ld~ 2/8/2007 12:45.
Agenda Item No. 8A .
January 15. 2008
Page 107 of 153
LIVINGSTON ROAD @ SITE ACCESS
Agenda Item No. 8A
- ,- ,,"', ,1C\ 'Jnnj:l
TWO.WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Page 108 of 153
General Information Site InformatIon -
c..nalvst RLP Intersection Site Access @ Livinaston Rd
o,Qsncy/Co. TR Transportation Consultants urisdiction Collier County
Date Pertormed 2/6/2007 IIlAnaivsis Year BUildout
c'na Ivsis Time Period lAM Peak Hour III
-
Project Description F0604. 14-Lane Park CPUD
EastIWest Street: Site Access INorth/South Street: Livinaston Road
Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25
~ehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Maior Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
lVoiume (vehlh) 1470 1220 15
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 26 0 0 0
veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 .. - 0 - --
Median Tvpe Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Upstream Sional 0 0
Minor Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Voiume Ivehlh) -
25 I
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF . 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 1284 15 0 1547 0
(vehlhl
Percent Heavy Vehicies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0
Confiouration R
Delay, Queue Lenqth, and Level of Service
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
V (ven/h) 26
C (m) (vehlh) . 422
v/c 0.06
95% queue length . 0.20
Control Delay (s/veh) 14.1
LOS 8
Approach Delay (slveh) -- -- 14.1
Approach LOS -- n B
Copyright if:) 2005 UnIverSity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS.J.1M Version 5.2
Generated: 2/812007 12:42',
- I "t:; 0('\('\0
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Page 109 of 153
c;...nerallnformation Site Information
IjV~st RLP Intersection Site Access <fil Livinaston Rd
D>.~Emcv/Co. TR Trensoortation Consultants urisdictlon Collier County
Date Performed 2/612007 Analvsis Year Sul/dout
IAnalvsis Time Period PM Peek Hour
Proiect Descriotion F0604.14-Lene Park CPUD
EastlWest Street Site Access NorthlSouth Street: Livinaston Road
Intersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period Ihrs): 0.25
lVehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Malor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
volume (veh/h) 1570 2090 40
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hour~tow Rate, HFR 0 0 115 0 0 0
veh/h
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 .. -- 0 -- --
Median Tvpe Raised curb
RT Channelized -c 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Confi9uration T . T R
UDstream Slanai 0 0
Minor Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 . 11 I 12
. ~ L T R L T R
lume Ivehlh) 110
. C!ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2200 42 0 1652 0
j'veh/hl
Percent Heevy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 o .
Percent Grade (%) 0 0 .
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0
Configuration R
Delav, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration R
v (vehlh) 115
C (m) (veh/h) 210
v/c 0.55
95% queue length 2.92
Control Delay (slveh) 41.1
LOS E
Approach Del~y (slveh) - - 41.1
",pproach LOS -- -- f:
-
Agenda Item No. 8A
Jpyrigh\ It! 2005 Univers'~y of FIOtlda. All Rights Re~ervEld
HCS+lM Version 5.2
Generated: 2/B/2.007 12:43 PM
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 110 of 153
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
. ..
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 111 of 153
TRIP GENERA nON EQUA nONS
LANE PARK CPUD
ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7th EDITION
1.ond Use Weekday AM Peak HOllr Weekday PM Penk Hour Weekday
Shopping Center .
iLUC 820) Ln (T) ~ 0.60 1.11 (X) -I- 2.29 1.n (T) ~ 0.66 1.11 (X) + 3.40 Ln (T) = 0.65 I.n (X) + .\.83
T =Trips, X ~ \,000 sq. ft. of01.A
. ,
. ,
1:. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 112 of 153
PUDZ-2006-AR-103~6
PROJECT #2006020051
DATE: 8/28/06
KAY DESELEM
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
LANE PARK CPUD
(PROJECT NO. 0604,14)
PREPARED BY:
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
12730 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 4
Fort Myel'S, Florida 33913
239-278-3090
Certificate of Authorization #27003
August 22, 2006
IiJ fJ tufO(
Reid C. Fellows, P.E.
P.E. No.: 616~3
. ,
1:.. TRANSPORTATION
K (ONSULTANTS,INC.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
. ,
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
III. PROPOSED DEVELOFMENT
IV. TRIP GENERATION
V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS
VIII. CONCLUSION
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15. 2008
Page 113 of 153
..,
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 114 of 153
I. INTRODUCTION
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the
proposed SDP submittal of the Lane Park CPUD as a commercial planned unit
development. The site is located in the nOl1hwest comer of the intersection of Livingston
Road and Radio Road within Collier County, Florida. The site location is illustrated on
Figure 1.
The proposed development is slated to contain 50,000 square f~,t of commercial uses.
Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out access to Radio Road and a right-
in/right-out access to Livingston Road.
This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways. Trip
generation and assignments to the site access drive will be completed and analysis
conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject site is cUl1'ently vacant. The site is bordered to the n011h and west by existing
industrial development. Livingston Road borders the site to the east. The southern
boundary of the property borders Radio Road.
Livingston Road is a six-lane divided roadway along the eastern boundary of the subject
site. The minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard for this roadway adjacent to the
subject site is LOS "E". Livingstion Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph adjacent to
the subject site and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County.
Page 1
, .
POINCIANA
ELfMENTAR)
SCHOO
rnl
,
.I
~
\
I]J<
f3eir'J' Paw
Courlt!y Club
~
)~;':l;i~~';_;:;i:;~i\~'1i~ ,}.~~~ ,,~,,'-';
, lVER' tGn :boat tif
"In
1200
Q ~
!i of
~
~
~
a ...~~
(; If
- if GREY OAKS
~~~I'
~ G!!J.;P'
g I 0
!:, Janu
~ p .
3
~
q.
1.
~" :Jil:'J.'~
'" ~~~11(\ ."'-
~ "
'" -~
.~!:,~ -
~ll&;-Edt1!tmNtiW .
.' l'
-(~ I<,y
Jj
--
886
~
~
o
D
~
"
...
o
~
~
-
~
o
:5
i
886
GOLDEN GATE P WV
I
Gvl (1-Gate Canal . _ ,;' _ Po;
:;;~~.l,,~.;"t<.. '~f./~~~AmoI~Av;' './ ~X;;,~';-:~:~'~f:~~!t;~:7~};':"7-
,Sml Ma!t:os Blvd
o
! .>< <-.~-, ";k~rC.inlii~'AV::r'~-~~,-~,;
!' :i~'~~~ii';;,,:,~)i
-;. :''''!.'')h'~;-:'<\,':','.;:~~;~:_,
~~~B~t~tfJAv~/~;r~ .
v
~
o
ST. CLAIRE
SHOHES
O!
~
.:;
~
~
o
;i
34104
~
z
~
'"
,,~
T(!t@2olu....~_
'"
'"
w
:>
. .a:
utl
SaI.ln
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
LANE PARK CPUD
Figure 1
. \
1:.. TRANSPORTATION
K (ONSULTANTS,INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 116 of 153
Radio Road is a four-lane divided roadway that terminates at AirpOli Road to the west of
the subject site. The minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standard for this roadway
adjacent to the subject site is LOS "0". Radio Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph
and is under the jurisdiction of Collier County.
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The SDP submittal for the Lane Park CPUD indicates the request to obtain the necessary
building pennits to allow the construction of 50,000 square feet ofretail floor area. Table
1 summarizes the land uses utilized for trip generation purposes for the subject
development.
Table 1
Lane Park CPUD
Land Uses
In order to determine the access configuration for the subject site, conversations were
held with the Collier County Transportation Planning Department. Based on our
discussions with Staff, access can be provided to the proposed development via a right-
in/right-out to Radio Road in addition to a right-inlright-out access to Livingston Road.
It should be noted that the Livingston/Radio Road Commercial lnfill Subdistrict of the
Collier County Growth Managcmcnt Plan restricts the access to this parcel along
Livingston Road and Radio Road. Specifically, access to Livingston Road was restricted
to a right-in/right-out and further restricted to the northern one-third of the frontage on
Livingston Road. The driveway to Livingston Road proposed as a part of this submittal
is in compliance with the Livingston/Radio Road Commercial lnfill Subdistrict language
within the Collier County GIOwth Management Plan.
Page 3
.,
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 117 of 153
, ,..--
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
IV. TRIP GENERATION
The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the
Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7th Edition.
The trip generation of the proposed retail floor area was calculated based on Land Use
Codes 820 (Shopping Center). According to the land use description for the shopping
center use, "A shopping center is an integrated group oj commercial establishments that
is planned, developed, owned and managed as a unit. A shopping center's composition is
related to its market area in terms of size, location and type oj store. A shopping center
also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. "
Should the proposed Lane Park CPUD develop based on the retail floor area indicated
within the proposed site plan, the retail development will function most similarly as a
shopping center based on the ITE lanel use description. Table 2 outlines the anticipated
weekday A.M. peak hour, P.M. peak hour and daily trip generation of the proposed
commercial planned unit development. The trip generation equations for Land Use Code
820 are included within the Appendix ofthis report for reference.
Table 2
Trip Generation
Lane Park CPUD
The commercial use shown in Tablc 2 will not all be new trips to the adjacent roadway
system. lTE estimates that a shopping center use such as the one identified within this
analysis typically attract an average of 34% of its traffic from vehicles already traveling
the adjoining roadway system. This traffic, called "pass-by" traffic, reduces the
development's overall impact on the sun'ounding roadway system but does not decrease
the actual driveway volumes.
Page 4
1:. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS,INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15.2008
Page 118 of 153
. ,
For this analysis, the "pass-by" traffic was accounted for in order to detennine the
number of "new" trips the development will add to the sUl1"Ounding roadways. Collier
County allows a maximum pass-by reduction of 25% for commercial developments such
as the Lane Park CPUD. Table 3 summarizes the pass-by percentage for the shopping
center use indicated within Table 2. Table 4 summarizcs the development traffic and the
breakdown between the new trips the development is anticipated to generate and the
"pass-by" trips the development is anticipated to attract.
Table 3
Pass-by Trip Reduction FactOl'S
Lane Park CPUD
Table 4
Trip Generation - New Trips
Lane Park CPUD
Trip Generation 65 40 105 190 205 395 4,330
Less Shopping Cenler -15 -10 -25 -50 -50 -100 -1,080
Pass-by Traffic
New Tri. s 50 30 80 140 155 295 3,250
V. nul' DISTRIBUTION
The trips shown in Table 4 were then assigned to the sUlTounding roadway system based
on the anticipated routcs the drivers will utilize to approach the site. TIle project
distribution was determined based on the anticipated routes the drivers will use to
enter/exit the site. The resultant traffic distribution is indicated in Figure 2.
Page 5
. ,
"
N
w*,
S
N.T.S.
GOLDEN GATE PKWY
..,.
..,f
'"
~
.-- I.L
~ t
r 15%
gs ..
CL
a:
<( SITE
+45%+
t
30%
..
ci
~ t
~ 20%
~ ..
z
:>
:::i
RADIO ROAD
+35%+
DAVIS BLVD.
LEGEND
+20%+ PERCENT DISTRIBUTiON
1: TRANSPORTATION
. K CONSULTANTS, INC.
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
LANE PARK CPUD
t n
" January 15, 20
Page 119 of 153
o
>
.....J
o:l
~
<(
(()
a:
<(
(()
t::
z
<(
(fJ
Figure 2
1:.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS,INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 120 of 153
"
Based on the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 2, the development traffic was
distributed to the site access intersections. Figure 3 indicates the site traffic assigmnent
based on the project traffic distribution.
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
In order to determine which roadway segments sun-ounding the site will be significantly
impacted, Table lA, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which
roadway links will accommodate an amount ofprojeet traffic greater than the 3%-3%-5%
Significance Test. Therefore, the project traffic was compared with the Capacity for
Peak Hour - Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the most recent Collier
County Concurrency Spreadshcet. A copy of the most recent Collier County
Concunency Spreadsheet is attached in the Appendix of this report for reference. Based
on the information contained within Table lA, only Radio Road from Airport Road to
Livingston Road will be significantly impactcd in accordance with the Collier County
3%.3%-5% Significance Test. Therefore, concunency link analysis was only required on
Radio Road and Livingston Road adjacent to the subject site.
In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table I A also includes a concurrency
analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The cunent remaining capacity
indicated within Table lA was taken from the aforementioned Collier County
ConculTency Spreadsheet. The project traffic was then subtracted from the remaining
trips in order to determine the remaining capacity after the Lane Park CPUD traffic is
added to the sUlTounding roadway network.
Page 7
~.
"
o
'"
o
U.
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC,
enda Item No. 8A
.Janua Y 10,
Page 121 of 153
MARKET AVENUE
0'
~
'"
~
~
------
(110)25-.. t
o
~
0'
~
Cl
~
z
o
f-
rJl
(')
Z
~
.J
I
",I
~I
"'I
.~ 1 '\. 50 (150)
~I....-(-)
(85) 25 ...
DO
I'-- ...
...... -- ---
--....l{) 0
;; ~~ J-
.... 25 (65)
(85) 25"
LEGEND
.... 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
.... (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
- INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS
SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
LANE PARK CPUD
S
N.TS.
RADIO ROAD
Figure 3
1
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS,INC.
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 122 of 153
.,
VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS
Based upon the information contained within Table lA, sufficient capacity will be
available on both Radio Road and Livingston Road after the addition of the Lane Park
CPUD traffic. Figure 4 indicates the remaining capacity on Radio Road and Livingston
Road in front of the subject site based upon the existing conditions as well as after the
addition of the Lane Park CPUD traffic. As can be seen within Table lA and Figure 4,
there will be available. capacity after the addition of the traffic associated with the subject
development, so there are no concurrency issues on the Collier County roadway network.
Intersection analysis was performed at the site access intersections to Radio Road and
Livingston Road. The site access intersections were analyzed utilizing the latest version
of the HCS+ software. The turning movements at the subject intersection were taken
fi'om Figure 3 of this repOli. Additionally, the through volumes on Radio Road and
Livingston Road were calculated by subtracting thc remaining capacity from the Level of
Service Standard indicated within the most recent Collier County Concurrency
Sprcadshcct. In order to assume a "worst case" intersection analysis, the peak direction
through volume was utilized for the through movements in both directions on Radio
Road and Livingston Road. Both site access driveways will only allow right in/right out
turning movements.
Attached in the Appendix of this report arc the resultant HCS+ data sheets. It should be
noted that Livingston Road was assumed to consist of fOUI lanes for the intersection
analysis due to the fact that IICS-I is incapable of analyzing six-lane highways at
unsignalized intersections. In order to illustrate the results of the intersection Level of
Service analyses, Table 5 was created.
Page 9
,.,
\ .--
N
w*,
S
NT.S.
GOLDEN GATE PKWY
'- 0.4%
.,.
~,
o
'"
o
u..
Cl
<{
o
0::
Ii:
o
D-
o::
<(
Cl
0::
'z
~
CfJ
CJ
Z
;;
SITE~:::'
.
l590
(540)
[440)
6.9%
0.8%
0.7%
2,517
(2,492)
[2,407)
2.8%
RADIO ROAD
590
(568) _
[520J
3.2%
2.6%
1.1%
DAVIS BLVD.
'"'C. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
LEGEND
000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY
(000) REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER AM PROJECT TRAFFIC
[000] REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PM PROJECT TRAFFIC
0.0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE
" em No. 8A
January .
Page 123 of 153
Cl
::;
CD
~
<(
CD
0::
<(
CD
<(
I-
Z
<(
(f)
REMAINING CAPACITY ON
SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED ROADWAYS Figure 4
LANE PARK CPUD
L.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 124 of 153
Table 5
Lane Park CrUD
Intersection LOS Anal sis Resnlts
Davis Blvd (ill Site Access
Livingston Rd a Site Access
Based on the intersection analysis results indicated within Table 5, no intersection
improvements. beyond tU111 lane modifications at the site access driveways will be
required as a result of the addition of the proposed Lane Park CPUD development traffic.
No site access intersection approach on a public roadway that is directly impacted by the
proposed Lane Park CrUD dcvelopment is shown to experience an adverse impact as a
result of the added devclopment traffic.
Turn lanes will bc required as a result of the proposed Lane Park CPUD development.
Per the agreement with County Staff; a southbound right turn lane will be necessary on
Livingston Road at the right-inJright-out access location. This turn lane should lOonsist of
a total of 240 feet of taper and deceleration distance. Due to the close proximity of the
driveway to Market Avenue to the north, this driveway is being constructed with a 100-
foot inner radius in ordcr to provide deceleration distance within the subjcct site. It
should also be noted that I.ivingston Road tenninates 600 feet to the south of the
proposed site access driveway, so it is likely that vehicles on Livingston Road will be
traveling at a speed lower than 45 mph. The driveway depicted on the Master Plan
should sufficiently serve the projected turning volumes from Livingston Road.
As for the driveway to Radio Road, a westbound right turn lane already exists at the
proposed right-inlright-out driveway. This turn lane is constructed to its maximum
length of 170 feet due to the proximity to Livingston Road. No additional turn lane
improvements will be required as a result of the proposed Lane Park CPUD.
Page 11
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 125 of 153
. ,
""C.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS,INC.
VIII. CONCLUSION
The proposed Lane Park CPUD development located in the northwest corner of the
intersection of Radio Road and Livingston Road within Collier County, Florida will not
adversely impact the existing roadway network. The sUD"ounding roadway network was
analyzed based on thc most recent Collier County Concunency Management System.
Based upon the analysis contained within this repOl1, all roadway links impacted as a
result of the added Lane Park CPUD traffic will function acceptably after the addition of
the proposed development traffic. Therefore, no roadway link improvements will be
required as a result of the proposed Lane Park CPUD development.
Intersection analysis was performed at the site access intersections to Livingston Road
and Radio Road as a result of this analysis. Based on the results of the intersection
analysis, no intersection improvements will be required as a result of the addition of the
development traffic. All intersection approaches at the site access driveways are shown
to operate under acceptable Level of Service conditions when the development traflic is
added.
Turn lanes are required as a result of the proposed Lane Park CPUD development. A 240
foot southbound right tum lane on Livingston Road will be required at the right-inlright-
out driveway. The deceleration distance is being incorporated within the subject site on
the driveway due to the close proximity of Market Avenue to the nOl1h. No modifications
will be required to tne existillg tUtTI lane on Radio Road at the site access location due to
right-of-way constraints. No additional turn lane improvements will be required as a
result of the proposed Lane Park CPUD development.
\k\2006\04\14\rcport.Joc
Page 12
APPENDIX
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 126 of 153
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 127 of 153
, ~ _..
. ,
TABLEIA
..1
f- ,.
Z
<(0::>(") W ~ W
-"
0::>0", U U <Il <n <n <n
o~ u: :S
'-~ ci ('\J '- 0: w w w
"" >- >- >-
z .0 => .. ~
"' <n (j
E'-~ !!l ..
22:---
-ell Q)
. ell :J OJ " ~I ,- a a
uc '" z ~ f- a '" ~
CctlCL '" (j " '"
CJ-, z u w w '"
~ I- ~
. OJ .. "" 0
<( a. .. '" :il '" '" ~
W '" a. m '"
0: (j " '"
'"
I- " -~ ~
% Z ~
W Z (j ... a a
:ri ;;: :;; '" m ~
.. '" '0 C
:i a. '" ,
=> ~ '" .3 ~
!:2 "
" " .
U) 5
~ ..
>- 0
I- U ~
...J % ,. E ]
<t '" I- g
(j (j 0 0 0 0 0 Ul Ul 0 E
Z u: '" z z % Z Z w W Z .. ,
<t z a. >- >- . m
c ..
'" ~ . .
>- ~ ,
1ii . "
U . ~
li S
Z '"
0 ~ .~
W - '" .
n:: ~ oJ> [!i '" "- ';f". ';f". ';f". ';f". '" ';f". E .
0:: 0 0 ... " '" '" '" m '" . "
0: -" Z 0; 0; 0; oj M .0 oj ~ E
::J "- ;:: ,
Z , g
U Ul , .
0 Z ~ E
i= c ,
0 f- (j ~I ~ ... ~ ~ '" a '" " . g
~ '" ,
U " '" " ... '" ,
U w u: ~ " .
W ~ "" c "
oil 0 <2 0 ]
0:: :il "' ~ "' '" a '" u
0: '" '" c
<t a. f- '" '" '"
<t Q ~ .
~ ii:: ~
"<"" W f- f- il ~ .
w <t z (j 0 H
}- a '" UJ W '" '" '" ';f". ';f". ;f' E .
...J W ii:: '" ~ " ~ ~ D a '" '" '" . S
00 n.. 8i 0 ~ '" " " ;;
0: .
;:: .U a. a. E .
o::}- g ;;
Ii '0
::JU " " -0 ~
':i f- ~
O<t => '" ~
::en.. 0 0 '" [!i '" D 0 0 '" a '" a . 3
0 ~ a a '" a '" '" :C! ~
~ '" ;; 0 a '" N N
~ -" Z '" " " " '" ~ ~
<t a a ;:: " 0
}- '" ;! ~ ~
W '" ~ .
n.. z ~
"
<t ;;: 0 c
e .
U ~I li .~
LL. " " 5: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
:;:; :;:; ~ .J .4 .J ~ ~ .J ~ ~ . .
Z '" '" '" '" '" " " " 2 ;;
(!) '" ~ '0
'0 c
U) 0 "
~ ~
f- c
;;;: Z L> ~
UJ m .
91 0
'" :i " "' " '" ", '" m a c ~
"' '" '" '" '" ... E
, " 0 c
~ J: J: UJ E 9
0 a. a. '" . .
C") m
> > ~ c
, , ,
~ a '" , :J
0 '" '" "
C") '" " c
0
" " ~ " "
0 Cd ~ "
c ~
G: ~ 0
"" a. u in
"" "" ~ ~
g C2 . 0: .
" " ;,
c c .~
f- n u '-" ~ 0 a .
f-- '" '" '" ;;; ;;; . c
I' e '" .
" " f- a 0 0 0 m ~ " m
e
UJ W Z '6 ii ~ -" ii .. ., c "
0 ~ w . . " . Ui ::; , " .
0 0: 0: '-" Ui 0: .::; > E
:i .
0: '" '-" " ~ ~ '5 ~ '0 '5 ~ ~ ~
a. Q 0 u a a 0 .
'" '" UJ Z uj Z Z Z '" '" W fS iO
'"
:J =>
0 0
J: I
" "
ifJ ifJ u
'"
"- "- u 0
" " >- '" 0: ~
.. 0 c .
.. "- 5: 0: a 0
.J .J ;;; 0:
.. .. 0 '" ~ 0
I- f- .. 0 c '6
0 0 0 e- , .
f- f- 0: <( :J 0:
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 129 of 153
. ,
COLLIER COUNTY CONCURRENCY
SPREADSHEET
"
I
<(co""'
COOLl)
O~
.., ON,->-
Z .0
Ll)
.. E~g
aJ""~
==row
\ (ij::l 0')
"'Oem
emo..
aJ-,
OJ
<(
:;:;-
aJ
e
,;
0
'"
~
"0
0
@)
<u 1::
u
:; aJ
OJ "'
e ;;; 0
m <( 0::
ro .i
'" ,~ '"
m ""' 0 OJ
0 'C :0
0 0..
:y: m
0 i:i 1-
Z (D
0 e OJ
0 m 0
:y: N OJ '2"
() ro 1ii
z 0 (;)' OJ
111 '" C U)
U aJ e <) ~
':; e 0 .~ 0
'"
OJ :J Qj ~ 'ni
c , >
t m >- Z @) OJ
ro -J
<l> '" .;; c<.
'" u .;; W
.0 m 'C m
0 0 U- 0:: '" 0::
.~
~ 4.)
oi 0
E Q)
() 0 "E u :0'
'C ~ Q) 0 "
a. LL. III ... () U)
- '" 0:)-
0.. '" '" ,- ~ 0 '" Ll) (D 0 0 '" '" ill co N " 0 ~ ""' '" 0 Ll) ~ ;g co
<( 0 0 '" " '" '" Ll) '" '" N " ill N q> '" 0 D " '" " 0 Ll) co '" N Ll)
() N ~ 0 '" " " ~ '" ill '" N <Xl (]) Ll) 0 " " " ill Ll) '" N '"
~ ~ r ~ r r ~ N r ~ ~ r ~
:;;:
0-.
~ 0 CO '" '" N g, '" CO N 0> ('") m '" t- V '" ('") 0> V 0> V CO
<{
00
'" Lf) ,~ en t- .,. '" '" 0 m .,. <.D <.D "' ~ ~ :} I~ ,~ I~ 0' <0 '" N ill m <0 ill N ~ 00 <:> r- (0''''''
0 CD ~ m 00 <0 .,. ,,- ~ ~ ,,- ,,- ,,- r- Lf) M 0 "f gj '" t- m "' 0 '" '" '" l.D 0 N ~ ID .,.
00 '" 0 M ~ N t- r- t- '" 0 tn N tn N N ~ .,. ~ ~ r- ID '" ill .,. "- In M ID "- ID ill
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
g~
"- Lf) M ~ '" (Q 0 0 tn CO ill en en 0 "<t '" ill '" '" '" ~ (") 0 (") .,. ~ N .,. <0 '" N 0 M "<t"
;~ '" Lf) "<t M CO 0 '" M (Q tn ~ N N 0 N t- O ,,- ,,- t- to '" <Xl N m to (") <Xl CO 0 ,,- ~ Ol (")
~ OJ <0 tn 00 tn ~ ~ ~ tn <Xl '" ill '" to ~ t- M N N 0 N N N 0 <Xl OJ ill 0> ~ CO ill ~ N
~ ~ ~ ~ N M N '" N N ~ N N N N N M N N N N -
'"
::>
~C "- Lf) M ~ M (Q 0 0 '" (Q to OJ en 0 "<t '" to M M '" ~ M 0 M ,,- ~ N 'Ci, CO en N 0 M ;;\
N 0') ill t- (Q '" '" m ~ '" 00 ~ ro 00 0 t- t- '" m ~ ~ 00 '" "- CO OJ '" ill t-
~ ~ N ~ M '" ~ N M M .,. '" to ~ M '" ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ N CO ill N t- '" '" '" '" 0 0> "<t en y, m 0 t- t- N r- "<t r- N ~ ~ (Q en <:> ~ Ol '" N 00
0 ro <0 '" tn en ~ ~ ~ "<t r- N '" N 0 tn en ro 00 "<t (Q N N en tn tn "<t "" 0 t- Lf) ~ ~
~ ~ ~ N '" ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N N N '" N N N N
0 0 0 0 UJ UJ II U U U U U II l) l) UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ l) U U UJ UJ UJ UJ W W UJ W UJ W
.,. "<t "<t "<t (Q (Q N N N N ,,- N N N N CO <0 (Q to ill CO N N N ill to ill ill ill ill to ill to ill
-
0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" 0 <0 '" tn '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,,- ,,- CO '" t- O> t- r- r- r- to r- t- t- t- ~ '" '" 0 0 0 r- "-.t- 0 N r- .,. '" ~ t- N <.D ro
en '" ro en 0 r- OO ro <0 ro ro ro ro <0 ro ,,- ro ~ N '" N 0 0 "" "<t tn M ,,- 10 ,,- ,,- 0') ro ro
~ N ~ ~ '" N ~ '" M '" '" '" ~ ~ N '" M '" 0') '" M '" '" '"
..
'0 "" D
>-. " '" >- D
'" 1ii '" 0 0 '" '"
" "" " E D '0 0:: " C
'0 "" ro 0:: ro ill '" -<= 0::
rn -e ~ E D ill .S 0 D .c D
0 '" D ~ "" -e rn >- m >- 0:: '" () '" '" Ol ""
'" '- C ...I ill
0:: Ci. IU '" ill .'" 0 '" 0 (L C
> " .C '" I > .~ ::> I!'
ill >- iU '3 0 .0 Ul 0:: Ol 0:: D
C J!! ill 10 U:: D ill Ul '0 ill C
~ ::> Iii D ill " 0 IU ~ 0 '3 c '" 00 0 '" '" Iii " LL
rn c ::> III '3 2:- z , '3 0 00 8 ::> 0.. OJ ~ ill 0 0 ~ ,
00 ill 0 C) " 0 if) Ql 0 III 0 Ql "" 0) 0:: 0: (9 Ql
.;c 00 0:: ., er: c J!! 00 ~ 0 Ul rn -e ~ 'Q .,
>. c 00 r- oo <{ <{ OJ 00 Ul '" l) c "" '" III .c c ~ OJ
~ '" '0 en 5 o. N N en t D> ~ ;;; en OJ 0.. 0:
C =* OJ 0 Ul '0 Ul J!!D .'!! '0, 0 c () " '0
.0 "0 00 00 N '" N ro ro N 0 C N " D OJ C
::> '6 's; '" 0 'S; EO "Ill '" C D OJ E c ',- 4ll III "0 0
0 0 0 0 '" IU 0:: I~ 0: iY; ~ 0:: 0: 0:: 0:: 0 '" III " ~ 0 '" 0:: '" ~ E '" :.; c 0 2! 0 OJ 0
U Ci. U C) 0:: 0 U , U U z U fJ) fJ) fJ) (9 G <{ o:er: l) (jJ fJ) 0 > (9 6: fJ) u (9 u C)
-
-e "" '0
III >- "0 () '" >-
> '" '" " 0 '"
.Ql 1: Ql 0 E "0 0:' ~
"0 C 0:: '0 '"
::> ~
0 ro E Iii ::J D E '" D Q' 0 D .c "0
00 0 Ql '" ~ '" > Iii > OJ 0:: '" lJ '" '" "
'" Ci. .0 C c c " Ci.
0:: > 5 € ro III I " > .'" ::J Ul 0 ro > 0 ::>
!!! c ...I i'> > :.; 0 0: OJ 0::
E 4ll OJ " ::> U:: "0 J!! Ul 00 'C U D " C
::> :; ro '0 0 0 ::> .0 OJ " ro Ql 0 .0 '" 0 '" '" ill "
Ol c ro 0 , :; "" ::> ~ Q' ~ " 0 >
'" fJ) z E 0 00 Ci. 0
'" 00 4ll 0 (9 0 l) C ill " 0: '" 0 c J!! :0 "" D> cr: 0:: (9 <{
E > 00 0: <{ fJ) ::> " 1il c J!! 00 ::> Ul '" ~ :Q
>. <( c r- ro <( CO U OJ if> '" 0 c "" ~ rn '" .c c
4ll C C ~ '" '" en .c m t D> ~ ;;; m QJ (L 0:: () OJ l"
"'C QJ Q' .2 ,,- 00 00 N iD N 'OU D if> 0 ..'!iu c ~ N l) '0, 0 '0 C
.0 "0 :0 s - III '" " 32 C
III ::> OJ 0 '0 tn ~ C " 0 EO '" '" '" 0 C ill Ol E c :; 2!
.J:: 0 0 ~ '" (f) 0:: I~ 0: 0:: 0: QJ OJ 0 0 III '" 0 i~ III 0: " ~ E ro c 0 0 OJ
U U (L (9 (9 0:: ::) U , U U z U I...I LL (9 0 ~ 0::0:: U (f) (jJ ...I > (9 i:i: (J) u (9 u
E E E
"" "" "" ro III rn
() () () > > >
0 0 0 <JJ <JJ OJ
:; '3 '3 .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c
E E E "' ~ "' "' Iii Iii "' Iii ~ t t t 1:: t: to to 10 t to
0 0 0 Ul Ul
E E E 00 en 00 '" ro '" ro ro ro ro ro ro 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ro '" '" UJ UJ UJ UJ W W W UJ W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
I I :r: l" l" ro .- -
~ 'n; 'n; 'n; 'n; 'n; .- .~ .~ .~ 'n; '~ .~ .- .~ .~ .~ '@ .~
OJ OJ ro ro ro I!' '" l"
~ D D D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"" "" ~ ~ ~ r- r- r- r- .r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
ro ro ro ro '" ro E E 'E .- .- .- 'E E E E E E E 'E 'E 'E E
c c c CO 00 00 E E E E E
Ul Ul if>
J!!"O J!!"O .QlD ro '" J1l en m m en m. m en m N '" '" '" ro ro ro '" ro ro ro '" IU ro ro ro '" '" '" '"
"0 C C N N N N N N N N 00 E E E E E E 'E 'E E 'E E E 'E E E 'E 'F E r
'" .,ro '" '" .,ro c
0 roo ro 0 ro 0 ro ro ro 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: ro ~ ~ ro ro ~ ro ~ ro ro '" ro ~ ~ ~ ro n; ro (,
0:: 0::0:: 0::0:: 0::0:: (J) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (J) (J) (J) (J) (f) r- f- f- f- r- r- r- r- f- r- f- f-
'" "" '" CD 1- ro 0 ~ N '" "<t U") CO t- oo D"l 0 ~ N '" .,. '" CJ) "- 00 m 0 ~ N '" .,. '" ill "-
"- r- r- r- r- " 00 00 00 00 ro "" "" 00 00 co '" m Ol en Ol m Ol m m D"l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I. .
\D
o
<:>
n
"-
is
.."
. '0
z
,E
2
.'"
u
c:
OJ
. Ol
<{
N :j: ... ~ (D N '" '" '" I'- ~
0 I'- 0 '" ;;1; N 00 g (D
'" ~ '" '" ... ... ... '"
~ N ~
'"
en
~
..., (!) (!) ()) ..,. '" ~ I'- I'- '" CO
'~ ... ..,. '" ~ '" N (!) 0 '" N
~ I'- I'- 0 I'- I'- '" I'- '" ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
row
::J0l
~~ (D (D '" i!; '" ~ I'- I'- '" '"
en '" ()) (]) '" 0 I'- (]) '"
'" N '" ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ()) T" :j: ~ ... I'- (!) '" ~ ...
..,. 0 ... I'- (Q (Q ... '" ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0 W 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N ... <0 (D N N N N ..,. (D
0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0
(D ()) N ..,. 0 I'- '" '" ~ 0 '"
r-- N CO '" (D 0 ~ 0 0 00 N
~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ N ""
, U
~
u rn
rn >
1e 1e 0 .!!1 u
a: ::J ~
rn OJ 0 rn
> > '" OJ CO >
U lD lD '" ::l .!!1
U; OJ :; :; rn C '" ::J
rn 0 0 0 0- lD W 0
w 0:: CO CO '" > U CO
to L C <( .!!! ~
~ ~ C .~ '0, E ~ e' .~ '"
... ... 0 OJ ... (])
Cf) (fJ e- O> 0 0> ~ (fJ lD (5 0::
0 ~ ~ >
=> => <i: -' 0 ~ ::> w () 0
u
rn
'E lD 0 u l' 'E
w a: lD rn
W rn C > rn rn
> 'E > ::J '" 'C 0 > >
'C u .!!1 Ul 0 0:: .!!1 .!!1
0 0 rn ::J Q rn lD ::l ::J
0 0- -
Q) '" 0 c: lD 0 0
(; .- 0:: rn ::l Ul :0 n; rn rn
0 0 ~
-'" .c ~ t c () c '" '" C C
Ul ~ ... 0 rn '0, u 0 rn rn
>. :; (fJ Q. 0> lD en c: E Ol en
rn L 0 QJ ~ rn E 0 0
rn l') ::> <i: -' ...J > -' ...J
U U U u
rn rn OJ rn
0 0 0 0
0:: 0:: 0:: a: u
Q) rn
.c .c .c .c 0 u u
> (.) (.) (.) (.) QJ '" a: ro ro
." rn ro rn rn > >
0 0 0
QJ QJ '" '" 'C ." Ul u 0:: a:
c rn rn CCl CCl 0 0 Ul ro
0 ~ - ~ ro 0 QJ '"
== 0- a: en '"
'" :0 :0 :0 :0 :0
'" ~ L ~ L -e L '" = U m
., rn lD '" '" '" QJ QJ C lD 0:: '"
E '0 '0 '0 U "0 U rn$ 0
0 C C C C C C QJ E
01_ C
.c rn rn rn rn ~ ~ ~ E
f- > > > > is a:
co ()) 0 ~ N ... '" I'- N ill I'-
0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- N N N
~ ~ ,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<(CO
coO
-Q
2>-
rn
u
!C
QJ,
Ol
<(
';7
'"
c
U
c
'(jj
<t:
@2:
rn<(
'0",
UN
~Ci ~
~...-I J5
'CO'I.D L.
1-0 ~
ro 0 "'u
EN
co - 't
-r:o~ aJ
..M.~1UVl
B(lJZc\4-
~5{guo
E.... 'S.::: Qj
I.......J ~ 01 OJ >
.~ co c.:t= (I)
>-o.!!!.@J..J
ro .- co.Y. ..
cCU:V1.-tJ
'E' ..co Iii '"
...U 1-.......
o t: .. .. .0
I- Q} 0 U ::l
u..Vlf-UVl
:L
l>
Z
OJ
C
'c
~
o
2:
u
o
o
(9
'"
.!!1
-0
21
lD
E
::l
"0
>
QJ
l>
.~
lD
'"
QJ
E
u
!C
QJ
'"
QJ
'"
rn
OJ
n:
-0
2:
co
"
1il
(9
C
QJ
"0
"0
(9
c
o
'"
lD
E
::l
"0
>
lD
.2
C
QJ
'"
lD
E
~
.E
Ol
c
:Q
o
.Q
lD
ro
lD
~
c
o
..,
rn
~
lD
>
C
o
l>
~
::l
o
"
"-
~
vi
'"
!C
co
.c
f-
'"
o
o
C:1
<n
:---
y'
'S;
rn
a:
.,
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 134 of 153
HCS+ INTERSECTION CAPACITY
ANALYSIS
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 135 of 153
,~
RADIO ROAD @ SITE ACCESS
" " " 0'
TWO-WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ."
January 15. 2008
D 010" ;"'1";
Generallnforniation Site Information
Analvst RLP Intersection Site Access fa) Radio Rd -
AgenCviCo. TR Transllortalion Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County
Date Pertormed 811612006 o,nalvsls Year Buildout
ii\nalvSis Time Period lAM Peak Hour
Project Descr;;:;tlon F0604. 14-Lane Parf< CPUD
East/West Street: Radio Road North/South Street: Site Access
Infersection Orientation: Easl-West StudVPeriod (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Malor Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1615 1590 50
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
;Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1615 0 0 1590 50
,(veh/h\
IPercent Heavy Vehicies 0 -- -- a -- --
Median Type Raised curb
.RT Channelized 0 0
ILaoes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Upstream Signal 0 0
IMinor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
, L T R L T R
IVolume (veh/h\ 15 ,. -
~eak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 100
li;ouri;/Iow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 15
veh/h
rOBrcont Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ercent Grade (%) 0 0
IFlared Approach N N
.- Storage 0 0
n Channelized 0 0
fLanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
20nfiguration R
,Jelav:- Queue Lennth, and Level of Servica
IApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Aovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ILane Configuration R
[" (veh/h) 15
; (m) (veh/h) 335
Ivlc 0.04
r: 5% queue length 0.14
:ontrol Delay (s/veh) 16.2
ILOS C
,pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.2
,,;pproach LOS -
-- -- C
- -
('."pyright@2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+fM Version 5.2
GencrLllod: 8f16fZ006 4:08 PM
^nMda item No. 8A
TWO-WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY January 15, 2008
Paoe 137 of 153
General Information Site Information
"Ivst RLP Intersection Site Access7cil Radio Rd
encv/Co, TR Transoortation Consultants urlsdiction Collier Counlv
Date Pertormed 811612006 o.nalvsis Year Buildout
~nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Hour
Proiect Description F0604. 14-Lane Park CPUD
EastlWest Street: Radio Road North/South Street: Site Access
I ntersection Orientation: East-West Studv Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
, Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1675 1590 150
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1675 0 0 1590 150
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- - 0 -- --
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
,Configuration T T R
Upstream Sional 0 0
Min or Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
, , L T R L T R
Jume (veh/h) 95
r'eak-Hour I"actor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
l~ourlY Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 95
veil/h)
'Oercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ercent Grade ('!oj 0 0
IFlared Approach N N
: Storage 0 0
n Channelized 0 0
ILanes 0 0 0 0 0 1
~onfiguration _..~.- - R
--
,Jelav, Queue Lenath, and Level of Service
IApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
~ovement - 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ILane Configuration R
I" (veh/Il) 95
: (m) (veh/h) 335
Ivlc 0.28
, 5% queue length 1.14
ontroi Delay (slveh) 19.9
ILOS C
,pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 19.9
,pproach LOS -- -- C
-. -"
~"pyrjght @ 20GS University of Flcrlda, All Rights Reselved
HCS+,M Version 5.2
GenerP.tted: 8116/2006 4:09 PM
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 138 of 153
. '~.,
'~ '
LIVINGSTON ROAD @ SITE ACCESS
^~ Q ~. I'<>m ~1{1 RA
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY January 15. 2008
P~ae 139 of 153
, General Information Site Information
J.A-<>aivst RLP Intersection Site Access @ Livingston Rd
.l ncy/Co. TR Transportation Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County
Date Performed 811612006 I\nalvsis Year Sui/dout
IAna iysis Time Period ~M Peak Hour
Project Description F0604.14-Lane Park CPUD
. EasUWest Street: Site Access North/South Street: Livingston Road
I ntersection Orientation: North-South Stud v Period (hrs\: 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Northbound Southbound
. Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1493 1483 15
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 0 25 0 0 0
(veh/h)
Percent Heavy Vehicies 0 -- -- 0 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Upstream SiQnal 0 0
IMlnor Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 7 B 9 10 11 12
L_~ L T R L T R
'ume (veh/h) 25
cak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
liOUrlY Flow Rate, HFR 0 1483 15 0 1493 0
(veh/h)
'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
IFlared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
'n Channelized 0 0
ILanes 0 0 1 0 0 0
~onfiguration R
- - -
. .Jelay, Queue LenQth, and Level of Service
IApproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound
~ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
ILane Configuration R
I" (veh/h) 25
; (m) (veh/h) 363
Iv/c 0.07
. 5% queue length 0.22
:ontrol Delay (s/veh) 15.6
ILOS C
_,pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.6
'proach LOS -- -- C
C'1pyrighl@2005 University of Florida, AU Rights Reserved
HCS+™ Version 5.2
Generated: 8/16/2006 4:06 PM
TWO-WA Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY '0 ~.._. v. ..
, J~nuary ,1,5. 2008
("I f 1~?
, General Information Site Information
Analvst RLP Intersection Site Access aD Livinqston P ..'
, Aaencv/Co. TR Transoortation Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County
Date Performed 6/1612006 "nalvsis Year Buildout
LA-naIVsis Time Period PM Peak Hour
PrOTect Descriolion F0604. 14-Lane Park CPUD
. EastJWest Street: Site Access INorth/South Street: Livinaston Road
Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Major Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 1523 1483 40
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 110 0 0 0
(veh/h)
IPercent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- n 0 -- --
Med Ian Type Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
ILanes 0 2 0 0 2 1
Configuration T T R
Upstream Signal 0 0
-
fMlnor Street Eastbound Westbound
V10vement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
!Volume (veh/h) 110
'eak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
l/,ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1483 40 0 1523 0
(veh/h)
IOereent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0
'ereent Grade (%) 0 0
IFlared Approach N N
.. Storage 0 0 .
n Channelized 0 0
ILan es 0 0 1 0 0 0
:onflguration R
Jelav, Queue Lenath. and Level of Service
!A'pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound
qovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
[Lane Configuration R
I" (vehlh) 110
. (m) (veh/h) 363
!vie . 0.30
-5% queue length 1.25
ontroi Delay (s/veh) 19.2
~OS C
oproach Delay (s/veh) -- n 19.2
-
npproach LOS n -- C ~
:;'oDyrighl@2005 Universily of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+ ™ Version 5.2
Generaled: 8/16/2006 4:05 PM
Agenda item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 141 of 153
r
\ ,
-.~ '.
\'
.'
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
,_._\
_."--
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 142 of 153
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
LANE PARK CPUD
ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7(h EDITION
-.--
Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour I Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday
Shopping Center Ln (T) ~ 0.60~n (X) + 22<)J Ln (T) ~ 0.66 Ln (X) + 3.40 Ln (T) ~ 0.65 Ln (X) + 5.83
-- (LUC 820) -- ---
T = Trips, X ~ 1,000 sq. ft. of GLA !
c..._
2007 FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT
DOCUMENT# P14073
Entity Name: CCPP, ING.
F bFI2l3~_tem No. 8A
e , r 15.2008
Secretary 0 ~El3 of 153
~urrent Principal Place of Business:
New Principal Place of Business:
1100 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
STE 201
NAPLES, FL 34102 US
Current Mailing Address:
New Mailing Address:
1100 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
STE 201
NAPLES. FL 33940 US
FEI Number: 59-2155256
FEI Number Applied For ( )
FEI Number Not Applicable ( )
Certificate of Status Desired ( )
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
Name and Address of New Registered Agent:
CORPORATION COMPANY OF MiAMI
% SHUTTS & BOWEN
201 S BISCAYNE BLVD
MIAMI. FL 33131 US
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing Its registered office or registered agent. or both,
In the State of Fiorida.
SIGNATURE:
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent
Date
Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund Contribution ( ).
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
ADDITIONSfCHANGES TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
Ie:
dme:
Address:
City-51-Zip:
so ( ) Delete
CONNOR, SYLVIA
3531 BONITA BAY BLVD #300
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134
Tille:
Name:
Address:
City-SI-Zip:
( ) Change ( ) Addition
Title-
Name:
Address:
City-51-Zip:
PTD ( ) Delete
WANKL YN. JOHN A
1100 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH #201
NAPLES,FL 34102
Tille:
Name:
Address:
City-SI-Zip:
( ) Change ( ) Addition
I hereby certify that the Information supplied With thiS filing does not qualify for the for the exemptJon stated In Chapter 119.
_Florida Statutes. I further certify that the Information indicated on this report or supplemental report IS true and accurate and that
'Y electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath. that I am an officer or director of the corporation or
Ie receiver or trustee empowered to execute thiS report as required by Chapter 607. FlOrida Statutes; and that my name appears
above. or on an attachment with an address, with all other like empowered.
SIGNATURE: JOHN A WANKL YN
Electronic Signature of Signing Officer or Director
p
0212312007
Date
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15, 2008
Page 144 of 153
EXHIBIT A
FOR LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PUD
Regulations for development of the Lane Park CPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of
this CPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and GMP in effect at the time of
issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this CPUD
Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections
of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply.
PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole
or in part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
1. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (group 8721).
2. Apparel and accessory stores with 5.000 square feet or less of gross square floor
area in the principal structure (groups 5611 - 5699).
3. Auto and home supply stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in
the principal structure (group 5531).
4. Automotive services (group 7549) except that this shall not be construed to pennit
the activity of "wrecker service (towing) automobiles, road and towing service."
5. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools.
6. Beauty shops (group 7231), except beauty schools.
7. Business services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322-7338, 7361 - 7379, 7384, 7389
except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik
work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, contractors' disbursement,
cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, directories - telephone, drive-
away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field
warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas
systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing,
packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, pipeiine or
powerline inspection, press clipping service, recording studios, repossession
service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and
slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool
cleaning, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting, window
trimming, and yacht brokers.
8. Child day care services (group 8351).
9. Churches and other places of worship.
10. Civic, social, and fraternal associations (group 8641).
i I. Depository institutions (groups 60] 1-6099).
i 2. Drinking places (group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. All establishments engaged
in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to
the locational requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC).
Page lof8
Revised i 2-2 ] -07
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Agenda item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Eating places (group 5812 only). All establishments engaged in the reWIJM1t\!'tiff 153
alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to locationa1
requirements of the LOC.
Educational services (groups 8211-8231, except regional libraries).
Food stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal
structure (groups 5411-5499).
Gasoline services stations (group 5541 subject to the LOC).
General merchandise stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in
the principal structure (groups 5331-5399).
Hardware stores with 1,800 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal
structure (group 5251).
Health services (groups 80 II - 8049, 8082).
Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment stores with 5,000 square feet or less of
gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 5712 ~ 5736).
Insurance carricrs, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411).
Legal services (group 8111).
Management and public relations services (groups 8741 - 8743, 8748).
Membership organizations (groups 8611. - 8699).
Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7629 -- 7631, 7699 bicycle repair, binocular
repair, camera repair, key duplicating, lawnmower repair, leather goods repair,
locksmith shop, picture framing, and pocketbook repair only).
Miscellancous retail with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area, (groups
5912 ~ 5963 except pawnshops and building materials, groups 5992 ~ 5999
except auction rooms, awning shops, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments,
swimming pools, tombstones and whirlpool baths).
Museums and art galleries (group 8412).
Nondepository credit institutions (groups 61 i 1 - 6 i 63).
Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups, 0781, 8711
- 87i3).
Paint, glass and wallpaper stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area
in the principal structure (group 5231).
Personal services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal
structure (groups 7211, 72 i 2, 7215, 72 I 6 non industrial dry cleaning only, 722 i-
7251, 7291, 7299, babysitting bureaus, clothing rental, costume rental, dating
service, depilatory salons, diet workshops, dress suit rental, electrolysis,
genealogical investigation service, and hair removal only).
Photographic studios (group 7221).
Physical fitness facilities (group 7991).
Public administration (groups 9111 - 9199,9229,9311,9411 - 9451, 9511 -
9532, 96i I, 9661).
Real estate (groups 6531 - 6552).
Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores with 5,000 square feet or less of
gross floor area in the principal structure (group 5261).
Security and commodity brokers. dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211 -
6289).
Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors (group 7251).
Transportation services (group 4724), travel agencies only.
United States Postal Service (group 4311 except major distribution centers).
Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 exciuding outside kenneling).
30.
31.
"7
-).....
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
Page 2 of8
Revised 12-21-07
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
42. Videotape rental with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in thE'<prin14jlalf 153
structure (group 784]).
43. Any other commercial use or professional services which are comparable in
nature with the foregoing uses including those that exclusively serve the
administrative as opposed to the operational functions of a business and are
associated with activities conducted in an office.
44. Any of the foregoing uses that are subject to a gross floor area limitation shall be
penmitted by right without the maximum floor area limitation if the use is
developed as an individual structure that is part of a shopping center.
45. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list
of penmitted uses and consistent with the penmitted uses and purpose and intent
statement of the district, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
PROHIBITED USES:
B. Principal Uses:
i . Am usements and recreation services (groups 7911, 7922 cOmmunity
theaters only, 7933 7993,7999 boat rental, miniature golf course, bicycle
and moped rental, rental of beach chairs and accessories only).
2. Homeless shelters, as defined by the LOC.
3. Social services (groups 8322-8399).
4. Soup kitchens, as defined by the LOC.
Page 3 of8
Revised 12-2] -07
EXHIBIT B
FOR LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PUD
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15, 2008
Page 147 of 153
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the CPUD. Standards
not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in
effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan (SOP) or subdivision plat.
GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be
in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium,
and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for detennining development
standards.
TABLE I
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES
MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 Sq. Ft. N/A
MINIMUMLOT WIDTH 75 Ft. N/A
MINIMUM YARDS (External)
Livingston Road 50 Ft. SPS
Radio Road 25 Ft. SPS
Market Avenue 200 Ft. N/A
Other Perimeter Parcel Boundary Greater of ] 5 feet or \I, height N/A
of structure
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN Greater of 15 feet or \I, of the N/A
STRUCTURES sum of the building heights
MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING
HEIGHT
Retail Buildings 35 Ft. N/A
Office Buildinl!s 35 Ft. N/A
MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING
HEIGHT 50 Ft. N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 700 Sq. Ft. · N/A
MAX. GROSS AREA 50,000 Sq. Ft. N/A
MAX. NUMBER OF STORIES 3 Stories N/A
. per principal structure, on the finished first floor.
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
MAX. LOT COVERAGE 30% of entire parcel
PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT 0.45 Acres
SITE LIGHTING Light poles prohibited except
to meet lighting requirements
at entry/exits
Page 4 of8
Revised 12-21-07
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 148 of 153
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PUD
Lot 27, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 1 B, as recorded in Plat Book
15, Pages 7 and 8 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
and
Tract A. COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE 3A, as recorded in Plat
Book 22, Pages 59 and 60 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Page 5 of8
Revised 12-21-07
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
FOR LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PUD
None requested. / This page intentionally left blank.
Page 6 of8
Revised 12-21-07
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 149 of 153
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
FOR LANE PARK COMMERCIAL PUD
Agenda Item No. SA
January 15. 2008
Page 150 of 153
TRANSPORTATION
I. The owner / developer acknowledges that access points depicted on the CPUD Master
Plan shall be re-evaluated by Collier County at the time of site development plan (SDP)
application and are subject to change.
2. The owner / developer shall provide a 30-foot wide non-exclusive frontage ingress-egress
easement parallel to Radio Road to the County and the owner of the parcel abutting the
southern parcel of the subject property subject to easements of record when and if
requested by the County. Additionally, the owner / developer shall construct
interconnection improvements over the subject property should such an interconnection
be required at the time of SDP application by applicable Land Development Code (LDC)
development standards or applicable County ordinances.
3. Site access will be limited to a maximum of one access point from Radio Road and one
access point from Livingston Road. Any Livingston Road access point shall be within
250 feet of Market A venue.
4. Payment in lieu of sidewalks along the Livingston Road and Market Street frontages shall
be required. The amount shall be determined utilizing FDOT's 2004 Transportation Cost
Estimates, as amended. The payment shall be provided prior to the issuance of the initial
SDP approval for all or any portion of the subject property.
5. All off-site improvements including but not limited to turn lanes and sidewalks shall be
completed prior to commencing site construction.
6. The owner / developer shall pay the project's "Fair Share" contributions for roadway
improvements as may bc required at the time of SDP application as determined by
applicable LDC provisions and/or policies established and approved by the Board of
County Commissioners by resolution or ordinance.
7. Nothing in any development order (DO) shall vest a right of access in excess of a right-
inlright-out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of
ingress, a point of egress, or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any
future cause of action against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or
assignee.
8. I f any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County R ights-of- Way
or casements(s), then compensating Right-of- Way shall be provided at no cost to Collier
County as a consequence of such improvements.
9. Site-related improvements (as opposed to system-related improvcments) necessary for
safe ingress-egress to this project shall not be eligible for impact fec credits. All rcquired
improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to issuance of the first
CO.
Page 70f8
Revised 12-21-07
Agenda item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
Page 151 of 153
10. On written request by Collier County, the developer, or its successor in interest, at its sole
cost, shall promptly reduce the Radio Road access to a right-in only condition, with no
claim whatever against Collier County.
Page 80f8
Revised 12-21-07
cpun I AND USF
EXHIBIT "e"
....
.....,...."""""""
,
.
~ SPACE 4e.3lll
4 """'...........
. IIlIUlINO ....
lOT'"
GENERAL N015:
.!'C.) .
.....
....
....
.....
a.ao 10-'"
!l.27:6: ,"""
to AQliIE4GE" IS PREllMINARY AND SUB.ECT ro QiANGE ro ADORfSS
PE1ffIIT11HG ISSUES. PROGRAMMING REFINEMENT AND MARKET
RJRa:s. HOIIElER, (PEN SPACE SHALL NOT BE REDUCED ro
LESS 1HAN.J(W AND 0fCAJEZ) P'RfSBi'\If" AReA SHALL NOT BE
lESS 1HAN o.-M Ac::RES.
2. THERE ARf ~01 ACRES (F NA D\If" \If"GETA TION IHICH ARE NOT
ENCUItIBERED BY DlWNAGE" CASEMENTS. .101 AC X fS1f
RETENnON/CREA TION R8JUIREIIENT - 0. ~ AewES. 0. 4::t ACRES
OR ItPPROJIJMAlElY 6BS (F RBJUIREJ/ENT. SHALL 8C GWl:04JEZ)
~ AS DEPiCreD ON MAS'fm PLAN AND ARE DEPlCreD
O~ H'tfJR/C SQILS. THE BALANCC SHItLL BE LOCA7E:D A T THE
1JME OF THE /NIDAL SOP APPI.JCA T1ON.
:J. SITE INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE UM17FD ro RlGHT-IN AND
RIGHT-OUT DRI\E'WAYS GENERALLY LOCA7ED AS DEPlC7FD.
e-.
l)
~
&.;
rQ
q
~
~
~
~~
~~
t:l..;-....:..
'"4'"4
~~
~~
gsgs
" ~~
~~
RAR ~~AI F'
g" ,. .,
Agenda Item No. 8A
January 15. 2008
- < " f 153
OF _ nRAINAGF FACSUFJ.IT
..,.
SPEaAL NOTE:
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IS
INTENDBJ TO BE Fl.EXIBLE.
BUT ItJUST BE COMPUANT
WITH CPUD DEVELOPIIENT
STANDARDS
MARKET A VENUE
.1".~~!!J.!.:f'I...I-I!I.j.
_ .,..,............-:'!o- . .
r'l::::;:::::::::::::;:::::::::~"'"
L . ("'~iii.-:im""':;r : - : . :
-_' ~::PRESERVE' .tc ::1".....
!. .~:: WAlER ::r"....
III. .f.:MANAGEMENT.:r"....
.. - '::AREA O.~%Ac::'.'.'
~. .t;:.. .~~~ct8<f.. ::1....
~: :tmIIEf~:: ~- :
,. . . . . . . .
........... ..
-.. . . .. . . .. ...
'..I'I!I~~l~~!-~..~..J~.>>>>>. r~~ . ....~
A .. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . ... ~.....
.-. ...............- . .......-.
-. .. . .
..'
".
i:-
~-:
~:-
I-
i'~
-.~
I.!'t,;
ij.:;;j
~:~
..
ii.!=:l
_.~
!.t:l..;
1':"1:
-'CJ
~1II.t/:l
q~!=::I
.~
~~~
~ . '"4.
tJ:ii .
I ~~.
~~ ~ .
~III~'
c~q:
.. .
. . .
ii.' -'. .
i.........-
_..-....
,.,.'
+
-
................. .................
...................................
................. ..................
...................................
................. .................
...................................
..................................
...................................
................. .................
...................................
...................................
.................................
.......................
...................... ..........
...................................
................. .................
...................................
..................................
...................................
................. .................
...................................
..................................
...................................
....................
~
HI':
~
~
~
II
+
-
190'
230'
II
.'~'.
::~::
::~ :-
.~ -
. !=:l:-
:~:::
.:"1:'-
. CJ.'.
.t/:l.-.
, !=::I':-
'~'.'
':s'"
:~:::
-~-:-
'q'.-
~
C3
~~
I 2; 400'
"a
!E-.
CI)
~
~
::::.:
~
H
-i'iiir~-tAin
--J~86'J RADIO ROAD
~,~
s
-
--......
UJlE p~JlIC CPDD
..... .IlUD .-r ~
-~~-
---
PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED
~COlSt.trNim~PINIt€R3~~~
_c:-...olllnl;lIlII!II'~lWUlLft.(8lAaoJUII!
--.-.-.-.--
.
hi
)~O
I ·
#
ORDINANCE NO. 08,_
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCUJDES
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS
FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATiON OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM 11ffi
INDUSTRIAL (l) ZONING DISTRICT TO 11ffi
COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE LANE PARK
CPUD LOCATED AT THE NORrnwEST CORNER OF
RAD[O ROAD AND UVINGSTON ROAD, IN
SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTII, RANGE 25
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSISTING
OF 5.27'" ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Michae[ R. Fcmandez, of P1aDning Dev. lne., representing Rodio
Road Joint V cnture, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real property.
NOW, TIIEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY 11ffi BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning elBssification of the herein described real property located in Section
36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the
Industrial (l) Zoning District to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD)
Zoning District for the Lan<: Park CPUD in occordance with Exhihits A through F
attached hereto and incorpo_ by reference !=in. The appropriate zoning atlas IIIlIp
or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-4[, as amended, the Collier County
Land Development Code, is hereby lIIIICIlded occordingIy.
SECTION lWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of
.2008.
ArrEST:
DWlGIIT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
BY:
Deputy Cieri:
CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form
""" legal sufficiency:
Maljorie M. Student-Stirling
Assistant County Attorney
Agenda Item N 8A
January 15. 08
Page 153 0 153
i