Agenda 01/29/2008 Item # 8B
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 1 of 186
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ-2003-AR-3601, New Hope Ministries, Inc, represented by Tim Hancock, AICP, of
Davidson Engineering, Inc., requesting a rezone from Rural Agricultural (A) with a
provisional use for a church authorized by Resolution No. 91-3 and the Neapolitan Park
Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved as Ordinance No. 90-6, to a new
Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District to be known
as the New Hope Ministries CFPUD. This project consists of 39.89,1, acres and will
consist of expanding the existing church facility. The property is located on the north
side of Davis Boulevard and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard at 7675 Davis Boulevard,
in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider an application for a rezone, to
permit the New Hope Ministries CFPUD and to ensure the project is in harmony with all the
applicable codes and regulations in order to make certain that the community's interests are
maintained.
CONSIDERA nONS:
r-
The petitioner wishes to rezone lands with current zoning designations of the Neapolitan Park
Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved as Ordinance No. 90-6 and Rural Agricultural
(A) with a Provisional Use for a church (Resolution No. 91-3 & 91-804), to the New Hope
Ministries Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD). The project will consist
of expanding the property from 20ci acres to 39.89", acres to accommodate a new 4,200 seat
sanctuary and related accessory uses, Accessory uses and structures include child and adult
day care facilities and administrative offices. Recreational uses and facilities will include but
not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, athletic fields, tot lots, picnic
area and a recreation building for special events.
The project is surrounded by residential and commercial development that are all land uses
permitted in the Urban - Mixed Use District. Additionally, the property is located within
Activity Center 6, and a portion of the property is designated Urban - Commercial District,
Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict. Activity Center 6 - Davis Boulevard and Santa
Barbara Boulevard is a Mixed Use Activity Center which has been designated on the Future
Land Use Map (FLUM) Series identified in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Mixed Use
Activity Centers are intended to be mixed-use in character. Further, they are generally
intended to be developed at a human-scale, to be pedestrian-oriented, and to be interconnected
with abutting projects - whether commercial or residential. The proposed rezone to a
community facility land use is compatible with the surrounding land use based on the Growth
Management Plan (GMP).
.- The PUDs in the surrounding area have various ranges of land uses. The Bembridge
Emergency Services Complex (ESC) which is north of the subj ect property is situated on
Page 1 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 2 of 186
39.82", acres of property and has a zoning designation of Community Facilities Planned Unit
Development and Residential Planned Unit Development (CFPUD/RPUD). The abutting
parcel east of Bembridge ESC and north and east of New Hope Ministries is Wildwood
Estates PUD (Ord. No. 81-27) which is positioned on 60", acres ofland and approved for 710
dwelling units at a gross density of 12.46 and approved for commercial development on 3
acres.
The parcel to the south is vacant and has a zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A).
Immediately to the east of that parcel is the Boys and Girls Club of Collier County which has
a zoning designation of Commercial (C-3). East of those parcels is the Cook Property PUD
(Ord. No. 05-29) approved for 160 single and/or multi-family residential units at a density of
3.95 dwelling units per acre on 40.48", acres. The PUD has been platted but is currently
undeveloped. The west parcel is Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ord. No. 89-62 & No. 98-
22) which was approved for 150,000 square feet of commercial uses on l8.a acres.
The applicant is also requesting a deviation from the LDC Section 4.06.00 for the North and
East property lines to eliminate the required wall along these areas due to the location of the
existing residential development and preserves. Staff does not support the deviation request
because the applicant has not illustrated how the adjacent residential dwelling units would
otherwise be protected with adequate buffering. Section 5.03.02.E.2 of the LDC states that
"Whenever a nonresidential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned
district, said nonresidential development shall provide a masonry wall or prefabricated
concrete wall and/or fence." The applicant failed to demonstrate that the intent of the LDC
can be effectively accomplished without constructing a wall. The LDC has a procedure in
place that provides the applicant the ability to request an administrative fence variance set
forth in subsection 5.03.02(A)(8) ofthe LDC.
If the applicant elects not to construct a fence, they can apply for an administrative fence
variance. At that time staff will be able to review the details of the proposed development and
determine that a masonry wall and/or fence. are not warranted between the residential
development and the nonresidential development.
Based on staffs review ofthe proposed project and the adjacent existing and anticipated land
uses, New Hope Ministries CFPUD is compatible with the surrounding property as well as
consistent with the GMP provisions and LDC regulations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The rezone by and of itself, will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if new Hope Ministries CFPUD is approved, a portion of the land could be
developed.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the GMP as needed to maintain
adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the
Page 2 of8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 3 of 186
requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order
approved by Collier County is required to pay 50 percent of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building
permit include building permit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting to the
County's water and sewer system.
Please note that the inclusion of impact fees and taxes collected are for informational
purposes only; they are not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission
to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT (GMP):
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): A portion of the subject property is designated Urban _
Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and is located within an Activity Center
Residential Density Band and a portion are designated Urban - Commercial District, Mixed
Use Activity Center Subdistrict. Relevant to this petition, both Districts allow a variety of
residential and non-residential uses, such as private or public schools, churches, recreational
and public facilities.
Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses,
residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses, community facilities, and other land uses
as generally allowed in the Urban designation. The actual mix of the various land uses shall
be detennined during the rezoning process and all Mixed Usc Activity Centers may be
developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict.
The application has been found to satisfy the specific development requirements for the Urban
- Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. Based upon the analysis, the proposed
use may be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
Transportation Element: Transportation Services Division staff has reviewed the petition and
notes the following: evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for
consistency with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element of the GMP and was found
consistent. Furthermore, staff recommends approval subject to the Developer commitments
contained in Section 5.6 of the CFPUD.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
The petitioner has not committed to a contribution that will offset impacts on affordable
housing. This petition is for a Community Facility Planned Unit Development to expand an
existing church and will not be including residential dwelling units.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and notes that the applicant has not
complied with staffs recommendations that all stormwater shall be prohibited from entering
the preserves. The project is consistent with portions of GMP Objective 6.1.1 regarding
Page 3 of 8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 4 of 186
minimum preservation requirement as the project is preserving 5.73010 acres of uplands and
wetlands on site, and meets the minimum 15 percent requirement of Policy 6.1.1.
The project is inconsistent with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME)
policy 6. 1.1 (5)b, in that the project failed in providing evidence that the stonnwater discharge
into the upland preserves will not result in adverse impacts on the naturally occurring native
vegetation. Some aspects that the staff is taking into consideration in regards to the retention
of stonnwater in to the proposed upland preserves are as follows:
I) The hydroperiod in upland areas is variable and can range seasonally from very dry to
saturated conditions. Directing stonnwater to be retained in the proposed upland preserves
will disrupt the natural hydroperiod balance;
2) The proposed preserve is mostly underlain by well drained non-hydric soils;
3) Directing stonnwater runoff to the proposed upland preserves can result in changes to the
nutrient and sediment loads.
Therefore, environmental staff recommends that all stonnwater shall be prohibited from
entering the preserve shown on the CFPUD Master Plan for the following reasons. The
applicant has not demonstrated that the addition of treated stonnwater into the upland
preserves on site will not result in adverse impacts to the naturally occurring native
vegetation. This is not consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.1 (5) b.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC heard the petition on September 5, 2007 and with a 5-1 vote recommended to
forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation
of approval with no stipulations.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-2003-AR-3601 on December 6, 2007 and by a vote of 7-0
recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a
recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions which have been
incorporated into the CFPUD and/or master plan:
I. The CFPUD master plan show full water quality pre-treatment volume shall be
achieved before the water reaches an elevation that would have the lake overflow its
banks and then backflow into the natural ground areas (preserves).
2. Water Management structures are limited to those required by the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD).
3. Section 5.8.c vacation easement of the CFPUD document shall be struck.
4. A footnote shall be added in Table I of the CFPUD document shall state, "the CFPUD
boundary for accessory use setback shall be 25 feet where abutting residentially
developed or zoned properties."
Page 4 of8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 5 of 186
5. Section 4.2.A of the CFPUD document shall state, "paved biking, hiking, and nature
trails, and boardwalks shall be non-paved surface, excluding the boardwalk."
6, Amend master plan to remove unnecessary detail in accordance with LDC
requirements for PUDs.
7. Parking for the church shall be limited to "a minimum of 30 percent of the required
parking spaces shall be pervious."
8. Provide an access agreement with Dolphin Plaza prior to the BCC hearing.
9. ModifY the master plan so that the 60 foot drainage easement along Davis Boulevard
(SR-84) permits the use of right-of-way (ROW).
10. Compensating ROW shall be provided for turn lanes along Davis Boulevard (SR-84)
if required by the County.
11. If turn lanes are lengthened to serve the church as part of the widening of Davis
Boulevard (SR-84), the property owner shall reimburse the county for design and
construction.
12. Modify Table I of the CFPUD that maximum building height shall be 3 stories not to
exceed 48 feet.
13. The Executive Summary includes staff's justification for not supporting the requested
deviation for a fence waiver.
14. Include incompatible land use to Section 5.7 of the CFPUD docunlent.
Although the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous and no letters of objection
have been received, this petition has not been placed on the Summary Agenda because the
EAC vote was not unanimous. Also, further discussion is needed regarding if the applicant
should show full water quality pre-treatment volume before entering the preserves per the
CCPC motion or to approve the Environmental Services staffs recommendation that all
stormwater shall be prohibited from entering the preserve shown on the CFPUD master plan,
which is a different condition than the CCPe. Another reason why this petition is not on
Summary Agenda is because staff is not supporting the deviation request for the fence waiver.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is a site specific rezone from a Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District (approved with a
provisional use for a church by Resolution No. 91-3) and the Neapolitan Park Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Zoning DistJict to a Community Facility Planned Unit Development
(CFPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the New Hope Ministries CFPUD.
Site specific rezones arc quasi-judicial in nature. As such the burden falls upon the applicant
to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The
burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying
the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or
unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or
more of the listed criteria below.
Criteria for CFPUD Rezones
Ask yourself the followiltg questiolts. The altswers assist you ilt makiltg a determiltatiolt
for approval or Itot.
Page 5 or8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 6 of 186
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas,
traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided
or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall
be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed CFPUD with the goals, objectives and
policies of the growth management plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on
design, and buffering and screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to
serve the development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose
of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and
private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with CFPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications
of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed CFPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use
pattern?
II. Would the requested CFPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary.
Page 6 of8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 7 of 186
14. WiJI the proposed change adversely influence living conditions III the
neighborhood?
15, Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with sUlTounding land uses, because of
peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. WiJI the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. WiJI the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. WiJI the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute u grant of special
privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the nceds of the neighborhood or the
county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for
the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the
range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed CFPUD
rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with
the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and
as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the CFPUD rezone request
that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of
the public health, safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Page7of8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29,2008
Page 8 of 186
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at
the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. (MMSS)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve Petition PUDZ-
2003-AR-3601 New Hope Ministries CFPUD subject to the CCPC recommendations which
are now incorporated into the PUD with the exception of the following stipulation (stipulation
I, page 4 of Executive Summary) preferred by the CCPe.
In stead, Environmental Services staff recommends the following stipulation as explained on
page 4 of the Executive Summary:
I. All stormwater shall be prohibited from entering the preserve shown on the
CFPUD master plan.
In addition, the BCC deny the request for the fence waiver, and in doing so recognize that the
applicant can request an administrative fence variance set forth in subsection 5.03.02(A)(8) of
the LDC during the site development plan (SDP).
2. Deny the deviation request for a fence waiver.
PREPARED BY:
Melissa Zone, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
Page8of8
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page lof2
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 9 of 186
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
8B
This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. PUDZ-2003-AR-3601, Tim Hancock, of Davidson Engineering, Inc.,
requesting a rezone from Rural Agricultural (A) with a provisional use for a church authorized
by Resolution #91-3 and the Neapolitan Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved as
Ordinance #90-6, to a new Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) district
to be known as the New Hope Ministries CFPUD, This project consists of 37.95 acres and
will consist of expanding the existing church facility. The property is located on the north side
of Davis Boulevard and east of Santa Barbara Boulevard at 7675 Davis Boulevard, in Section
4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier County Florida.
1/29/2008 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Melissa Zone
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Principal Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
1/16/20083:40:41 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
1/17/20089:42 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Services
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
Transportation Services Admin.
1/17/20081:17 PM
Approved By
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Chief Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
1/18/20084:53 PM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Transportation Services
MPO Director
Date
Transportation Planning
1/22/20087:59 AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
1/22/200810:17 AM
Approved By
Susan Murray. AIC?
Community Development &
Zoning & Land Development Director
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
1/22/200812:57 PM
file:/ /C:\AgendaTest\Export\99-J anuary%2029, %202008\08. %20ADVER TI SED%20PUBL... 1/23/2008
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item ~Io. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 10 of 186
Environmental Services
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
OMS Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
1/22/2008 1 ;40 PM
A pproved By
Mark Isackson
Budget Analyst
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
1/22/20081 ;48 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
County Manager
Date
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager's Office
1/22/20082;57 PM
tile:/ /e :\Agenda T est\Export\99-January%2029, %202008\08. %20ADVER TISED%20PUBL... 1/23/2008
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 11 of 186
AGENDA ITEM 8-8
Co~r County
-.
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEAlUNG DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2007
SUBJECT: PETITION PUDZ-2003-AR-360l, NEW HOPE MINISTRIES CFPUD
OWNER: New Hope Ministries, Inc,
7675 Davis Boulevard
Naples, 1"L 34104
AGENTS: Tim Davidson, A1CP
Davidson Engineering, Ine.
2154 Trade Center Way, Suite #300
Naples, FL 34109
REOUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier County Plalllling Commission (CCPC) consider an application requesting a
rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural with a Provisional Use for a chW"ch (Resolution 91-3 & 91-804)
and the Neapolitan Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) appl'Oved as Ordinance 90-6, to a new
CFPUD Community Facility Planned Unit Development to be known as the New Hope Ministries
CFPUD,
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
This site is located on the north side of Davis Boulevard (SR-84), approximately 700 feet east of
Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
See the location map on the following page.
Page 10f8
COCO<<>
coOCO
O~
ON_
Z _0 nw ~
Q)
EN~
..'!lea>
-coO>
CO" co
-oeo..
cco
0)-'
OJ
<( i
g a..
~! l
I I I- e:(
::2:
(!)
z
-
c Z
0
h , N
t!1 ~
'1 0
~ 'I "
~
~ la <>
"'
'"
ci:
lWtA3Wi YVt'lM'C YJH'f1 <:
" ,
, '"
$1)rtlUIIS"AJa 0 0 <>
on. 0
'"
,
N
UI~lnl_ / I- e
- ::>
n.
..
g,j z
0
-- -iK ;=
!. \1 ;=
w
!K n 11 l, 0-
!\ . II' "!I&
. I .
i -Ii
'ow i, III a..
-~""""
! e:(
I . ::2:
Z
0
-
l-
e:(
()
i 0
~ ....J
" I
I
~oo""'"'
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 13 of 186
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTlON OF PROJECT:
The proposed project is zoned Rural Agricultural (A) with a provisional use for a church (Res. 91-3 &
91-804) and the Neapolitan Park PUD (Ord. 90-6), The request is to rezone to a Community Facility
Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to be known as New Hope Ministries CFPUD. The project will
consist of expanding the properly to accommodate a ncw 4200 seat sanctuary and related accessory
uses on 38.99* acres. Accessory uses and structures include child and adult day care facilities and
administrative offices. Recreational uses and facilities will include but not limited to swimming
pools, telmis courts, volleyball courts, athletic fields, tot lots, picnic area and a recreation building for
special events.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Subject Parcel: New Hope Ministries Church, zoned Rural Agricultural (A) with a Provisional Use
and undeveloped parcel, zoned Neapolitan Park pun
Surrounding: N011h: Residential dwelling units, zoned Wildwood Estates PUD and
Residential dwelling units, Calusa Park Elementary and EMS Station #19,
zoned Bembridge PUD
South: Vacant and Boys and Girls Club of Collier County,
zoned Rural Agricultural (A) and Commercial (C-3)
West: Existing Gas station and vacant parcels, zoned Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD
East: Residential dwelling units, zoned Wildwood Estates pun
Zoniul! Map
.
RPUD and CI'PUD
,
8EMBRIDG. EMS COMPlE'X
..
. ....... .. .
WU...DWOODESTATES .
Or
.
BmKmlR. 1A K.S
..
PUD loEAPOllTANPARK
B.RKSIIIRH4K.S PUO \ pun
SIiOPPES AT SAN/"A 84RSIlRA
.
Page 3 or8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 14 of 186
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GM!') CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): A portion of the subject property is designated Urban. Mixed Use
District, Urban Residential SubdIstrict, and is located within an Activity Center Residential Density
Band and a portion al'e designated Urban - Commercial Distl'ict, Mixed Use Activity Center
Subdistrict. Relevant to this petitiOll, both Districts allow a variety of residential and non-residential
uses, such as private 01' public schools, churches, recreational and public facilities,
Activity Center 6 - Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard is a Mixed Use Activity Center
which has been designatcd on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Series identified in the Future Land
Use Element (FLUE). The location is based on the intersection of major roads and on spacing criteria.
Mixed Use Activity Centcrs al'C intended to be mixed-use in character. Further, they are generally
intended to be developed at a human-scale, to be pedestrian-oriented, and to be interconnected with
abutting projects - whether commercial or residential. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane
intercOIUlecllons with abutting properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged,
Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses,
residential uses, institutional uses, hotel/motel uses, community facilities, and other land uses as
generally allowed in the Urban dcsignation, The actual mix of the val'ious land uses shall be
determined dul'ing the rezoning process and all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be developed with
any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict.
The application has been found to satisfy the specific development requirements for the Urban -
Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. Based upon the analysis, the proposed use may be
deemed consistent with the FLUE.
TrallSportation Element: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and notes the
following: evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with Policy 5,1
and 5.2 of the Tl'ansp0l1ation Elemcnt of the GMP and was found consistent.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME); The project is consistent with portions of
GMP Objective 6,1.1 regarding minimum preservation requirement as the project is preserving 5,73*
acres of uplands and wetlands on site, and meets the minimum 15 percent rcquil'ement of Policy
6.1.1.
The project is inconsistent with CCME policy 6,1.1(5)b, in that the project failed in providing
evidence that the stormwater discharge into the upland preserves will not result in adverse impacts on
the naturally occurring native vegetation. Some aspects that the staff is taking into consideration in
regards to the retention of stormwater in to the proposed upland preserves are as follows:
1) The hydropcriod in upland areas is variable and can range seasonally from very dry to saturated
conditions, Directing stormwater to be retained in the proposed upland preserves will disrupt the
natural hydroperiod balance;
2) The proposed preservc is mostly underlain by wcll drained non-hydric soils;
3) Directing stormwater I'Unoff to the proposed upland preserves can result in changes to the nutrient
and sediment loads,
Page 4 or8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 15 of 186
Therefore, environmental staff recommends that all storm water shall be prohibited from entering the
preserve shown on the CFPUD Master Plan for the following reasons, The applicant has not
demonstrated that the addition of treated stormwater into the upland preserves on site will not result
in adverse impacts to the naturally occurring native vegetation. This is not consistent with CCME
Policy 6.1.1 (5) b.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a thorough evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a favorable
determination would be based. The criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02,13 and Section
10.03,05 of the Land Development Code (LDC) and required staff evaluation and comment. The
Plmming Commission will use the same criteria as the basis for their recommendation. Each of the
potential impacts 01' considerations identified during the staff review are listed under each of the
criterion noted and are summarized by staff, culminating in a determination of compliance, non-
compliance, 01' compliance with mitigation, These evaluations are complcted as separatc documcnts
and are attached to the staff report as Exhibit" A" and Exhibit "B",
Utilitv Analvsis: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed the petition and notes the following:
No objection. This projcct is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundary, Pel'
Geographic Information System (GIS) a sixteen ineh (16") water transmission main is located along
Davis Blvd, as well as a fourtcen inch (14") sewer (['ansmission main. Any portion of tlus project to
be dcveloped shall be required to comply with current Ordinance 2004-31 and is subject to the
conditions associated with a Watcr and Sewer Availability Letter from the Collier County Utilities
Division at the time of SDP.
Transportation Analvsis: The Transportation Services Division reeommends approval subject to the
Developer conmlitments contained in Scetion5.6 of the CFPUD,
Environmental Analvsis: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and notes that the
applicant has not complied with staffs recommendations that all stormwater shall be prohibited from
entering the preserve shown on the CFPUD mastel' plan,
Engineering Analvsis: Engineering Serviees staff has reviewed this petition and found Environmental
staffs stipulations "to prohibit all stormwatcr from entering thc preservc" would rcquire the berming
of the preserves separate from the remaulder of the project. This could have the unintended effect of
reducing predevelopment surface water volumes, thus unnaturally drying out the preserve area, Staff
requests that the developer show full water quality pre-treatment volume before the water reached an
elevation that would have the lake overflow its banks and then backflow into the natural ground areas
(preservcs). The frequency at which that would occur is then somewhat controlled by the volume of
the lake and other drainage facilities between nonnal pool elevation and ground surface elevation. If
the County wants to have the pre.qerve areas receive hasically the predewlopment lcvcl of inundation,
then the engineer needs to evaluate predevelopment surface water levels for the various design storm
events and develop a post-devclopmel1t stormwater ma1lagement system (0 replicate that for the same
design storm events.
Enviromnental Advisorv Commission (EAC): The EAC heard this petition on September 5, 2007 and
with a 5-1 vote in favor to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a
recommendation of approval with no stipulations.
Page 5 ofR
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 16of186
Zoning and Land Development Rcvicw Analvsis: The Zoning and Land Development Review
analysis applies specifically for current and future hmd use planning and focuscs on the relationship
of the CFPUD to the surrounding properties. The existing church is on an 18.99 pnrcel with
Agricultural Zoning and was approved for the church facilities via Provisional Use (Res, 91-3 & 91-
804). New I-lope Ministries purchased the undeveloped land abutting to the west (Neapolitan Park
PUD Ord. No, 90-6) which was approved for a mixture ofratbcr intensive commercial and residential
land uses. New I-lope Ministries is requesting through this petition to rezone both parcels to CFPUD
for a church and educational land uses,
The PUDs in the sUl'l'ounding area have various ranges of land uses. The Bembridge Emergency
Services Complex (ESC) which is north of the su~ject property is situatcd on 39,82" acres of
propel1y and has a zoning designation of Community Facilities Planned Unit Development and
Residential Planned Unit Development (CFPUD/RPUD). Bembridge ESe is a multi-usc PUD which
consists of residential dwelling uses and emcrgcncy medical serviccs along with the existing Calusa
Park Elementary School. It also provides water management facilitics that will provide detention for
stonllwater I'un-off for Bembridge and tbe Santa Barbara Boulevard Road improvements. Bcmbridge
provides for a maximum of 7,000 square feet of building area for cmergency operations uses as well
as the ealnsa Park Elemcntary School. The residential portion of the Bembridge PUD was approved
for six (6) dwelling units per acre on Tract A. The abutting parcel east of Dembridge ESC and north
and east of New Hope Ministries is Wildwood Estates PUD (Ord. No, 81-27) which is positioned on
60," acres of land and approved for 710 dwelling units at a gross density of 12.46 and approved for
commercial development on 3 acres.
The parcel to the south is vacant and has a zorung designation of Rural Agricultural (A). lmmediately
to the east ofthat parcel is the Boys and Girls Club of Collicr County which has a zoning designation
of Commercial (C-3). East of those parcels is the Cook Property PUD (Ord. No. 05-29) approved for
160 single andlor multi-family residential units at a density of 3.95 dwelling units pCI' acre on 40.4810
acres. The PUD has been platted but is currently undeveloped. The west parcel is Shoppes at Santa
Bal'bara PUD (Ord, No. 89-62 & No, 98-22) which was approved for 150,000 square feet of
commercial uses on 18. let acres.
Based on staffs review of the proposed project and the adjacent existing and anticipated land uses,
New Hope Ministries CFPUD is compatible with the surrounding property as well as consistent with
the GMP provisions and LDC regulations,
Deviation fi'OIn LDC requirements: The applicant is also requesting a deviation from the LDC Section
4,06.00 for the North and East propel'ty lines eliminating thc requirement of a wall along thesc areas
due to the location of the existing developmcnt and preserves, Where preserves exist 01' are proposed,
no additional buffering will be required.
Staff docs not agree with the deviation rcqucst because the applicant did not illustrate how the
adjacent residential dwelling units would not be impacted, Furthermore, because a site development
plan is not requIred to be submitted with the rczone application, and staff is unable to determine the
overall impact the new church facilitics will have on the sUl'l'ounding properties. The LDC does have
a procedurc in place that provides the applicant the ability to request an administrative fence waiver.
The applicant shall demonstrate that the intent of the request can be effectively accomplished, without
constructing a wall/fence through the administrative variance process set forth in subsection
5,03,02(A)(8) of the LDC. At that tillie, staff will be able to review the proposed development and
Pag.60C8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 17 of 186
determine if the rear of a residence or some other physical separation exists between the l'esidentia!
development and the nOll1'esidential development.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The applicant held the required NIM on June 17, 2003, 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Church, Davis Blvd,.
Naples, however, no public attended,
The agent for the applicant held a second NIM on June 18, 2007 at the Ncw Hope Ministries
sanctual'y at 6:00 PM. Approximately thilty-five members of the public, the applicant's team and
COUl1ty staff attended, The petitioner's agent, Ml" Tim Hancock, presented an overview of the zoning
request and a conceptual Mastel' Plan of the project's development, There was no opposition stated to
the proposed rezone and development.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) forwards to the BeC a recommendation of
approval for petition PUDZ-2003-AR.3601 New Hope Ministries CFPUD with the following
stipulation:
1. The CFPUD and Master Plan show full water quality pre-treatment volume before the water
reaches an elevation that would have the lake overflow its banks and then back flow into the
natural ground areas (preserves),
LIST OF STAFF REPORT EXHIBITS:
Exhibit "A" - Rezone Findings
Exhibit "B" - PUD Findings
Page 7 of8
Agenda Item ~Jo. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 18 of 186
PREPARED BY:
~
JlZ ,', /, _. ()
. ", if' /'/"-J-" 'cY~
MELISSA ONE, :'\~AL PLANNeR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
/, / /7 ~C>.2?7
~'
REVIEWED BY:
~M- &no f)b~-~1J
MARJO IE STUDENT -S I ERLING
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATIORNEY
Jf- Zi-09-
DATE
,d-
LOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPA MENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVlEW
11-/6'0)
DATE
", Yn.~~
/I/<{! /07
DATE
S SAN M, ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEI' ARTMENT OF ZON1NG AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
/1 t~ft?
DATE
~
J S PH K. SCHMITI ADMINISTRATOR
o 1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND
E VlRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
Tentatively scheduled for the JanUalY 29, 2008 130ard of County Commissioners Meeting
Page 8 of8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 19 of 186
Exhibit A
REZONE FINDINGS
PETITION PUDZ-2003-AR-3601 New Hope Ministries
Chapter 10.03.05.0 of the Colliel' County Land Development Code (LDC) requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners show that the
Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following,
where applicable:
1, Whether the proposed change will be eonsistent with the goals, objeetives, and policies of
the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map and the clements of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP),
Pro: County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an in-depth analysis of the relevant
goals, objectives and policies of the Conservation & Coastal Management Element aod the
Futul'e Land Use Element and the Transportation Element of the OMP offering a
recommendation that this petition be found consistent with the overall OMP,
Con: None
FindinM: Based upon staff's review, the proposed development is in compliance with the
FLUE of the OMP for Collier County and all other relevant goals, objectives and policies of the
OMP,
2, The existing land use pattern.
Pro: The location and zoning map that is attached to the staff report illustrate where New Hope
Minisu'ies CFPUD site is located and the existing residential and commercla1land use in the
area.
Con: None.
Finding: This project will be compatible with the existing land use patte1'1ls as explained in the
staff repOlt. Also, since this project has been in existence since the early 1990s, most of the
sur1'ounding projects we1'e also reviewed for compatibility with this chul'ch.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrclated to adjacent and neal'by districts.
Pro: The design, layout, configuration, and size of the subject property is sufficient in size and
are compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial zoning districts.
Con: None.
Findings: The proposed rezoning will not create an isolated district related to adjacent and
nearby districts. The surrounding at'ea is developcd with residential and commercial uses and
essential services are avaiiable in this area,
4. Wllether existing district boulldades arc illogically drawn ill rclation to existing
conditions on the property PI'oposed fOl' changc.
December 6, 2007 cepc Hearing
Page 1 of6
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 20 of 186
Exhibit A
Pro: The site has substantial frontage on Davis Boulevard (SR-84) and is in scale with the
surrounding land uses.
Con: None.
Findings: TIle district boundaries are logically drawn and the land use request is in harmony
with the surrounding area.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions malte the passage of the proposed land use
change necessary.
PrQ; The proposed change is necessary for the expansion of New Hope Ministries and the
services it provides to their congregation. The rezoning will allow for accessibility and access
improvements that will allow the existing buildings to interact better with the church's new
development.
Con: None.
Findings: The proposed zoning change is appropriate based on the cxisting conditions of the
property and because its relationship to the GMP is encouraged,
6. Whcther the p,'oposed change will adversely influence Iiviug conditions in the
neighborhood.
Pro: The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood
because the recommended ll111d llse will not alter the other conditions fOl' approval. The
decrease of dwelling units f1'Om the Neapolitan Park PUD should ensure the least amount of
adverse impact on adj aeent and nearby developmcnts
Con: None.
Findings: The proposed New I-lope Ministries CFPUD is compatible with adjacent land uses
due to the similarities that should be realized between the ~url'Oul1ding rcsidentialuses and the
proposed community facility use.
7. Whether the proposed change will create 01' excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surl'ounding land uses because of peak
volnmes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity dlll'ing construction
phases of the development, 01' otherwise affect pnblic safety.
Pro: Development of the subject properly is consistent with pl'Ovisiolls of the Transportation
Element of the GMP. This project will not generate significant traffic impacts therefore;
approval of this project would be deemcd compatible with surrounding land nses and wiIlnot
affect the public safety.
Con: The adjacent and sUl'1'ounding property owncrs may pcrceivc that thc additional traffic
during prayer services could adversely impact traffic flow on Davis Boulevard (SR-84) even
though stafffrolll the Tl'8nsportation Division deemed the petition consistent.
December 6, 2007 CCPC Hearing
Page 2 of6
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 21 of 186
Exhibit A
Findings: The rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the
property with significant adverse impacts. Evaluation of thls project took into account the
requirement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Traffie Element of the OMP and was found
consistent. Also, the proposed CFPUD removes the multi-family dwelling units and
commercial and motel uses which would have placed traffic congestion onto Davis Boulevard
(SR-84)
8. Whetllel' tile proposed change will create a drainage problem.
Pro: Every project approvcd in Collier County involves staff to scrutinize its activity and
require the developers to decrease all sub-surface drainage impacts that is generated by the
developmental activities.
Con: None,
Findings: The LDC specifically provides tile development standards that al'e dcsigned to
reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. New dcvelopment in and of itself is not
supposed to increase Hooding potential on adjacent property over and above what would occur
without development, In summary, this project has been reviewed for consistency the
applicable regulations and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated by
developmental activities as a condition of approval.
9. Whether thc proposed changc will scriously reduce light and air to adjaeentllrcas.
Pro: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to
the zoning district in which it is located. These development standards and others apply
generally and equally to all zoning districts (Le, open space requirement, corridor management
provisions, etc.) were designed to enSlll'e that light penetration and circulation of air does not
adversely affect adjacent areas.
Con: NOlle.
Findings: The proposed project will not reduce light and air circulation to the adjacent areas
because of the site design and the maximum forty-cight foot height for principal structmes that
is being rcquested will not reduce light and air to the adjacent areas.
10. Whcther tlie proposed change willlldvcrsely affect property valucs in the adjacent area.
Pro: As noted in the staff report, Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD and Wildwood E~tates PUD
are the closest commercial and residential dcvelopment to the proposed project and has shared
a common boundary with the cxisting properties since the inception of the provisional .Ise for
New Hope Mitlistries (Res. 91-3 & 91-804), The proposed PUD rezone is not anticipated to
alter the compatibility. The land value of the other land uses in the surrounding area,
commercial, multi-family residencies, and undeveloped land is not anticipated to be lowered by
the proposed change.
C<m; N ono
Findings: Property valuation is affected by a host offaelors including zoning; however, zoning
by itself mayor may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market
December 6, 2007 ccpe Hearing Page 3 of 6
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 22 of 186
Exhibit A
value, The mcre fact that a property is given a new zoning designation mayor may not affect
value,
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the imp,'uvement or development of
adjacent properly in aecOl'danee with existIng regnlations.
Pro: The proposed rezone is consistent with the purpose of the GMP and LDC and will not
l'e.51\lt in a detriment to the community as a whole.
Con: None.
Findings: The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is the
sound application of the standards, when combined with the site development plan approval
process and gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to
improvement 01' development of adjaeent property. Furthermore, the proposed CFPUD is an
allowable land use in the Mixed Use Activity Centers and Urban Residential Subdistrict of the
GMP.
12, Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the publie welfare,
Pro: The change, if grantcd, will not result in an cnclave of pmperty owners enjoying greater
privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other propetty owners in the vicinity where
there is no substantive difference in the properties thcmselves which justifies different
designations.
Con: None,
f.i!ldin~s: The proposed New Hope Ministries CFPUD complies with the GMP regulations;
consequently the proposed changc does not constitute a grant of special privilege.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the properly cannot be used ill accordance
with existing zonin\:.
Pm: A portion of the existing zoning is part of the Urban Residential Subdistrict which is a
preferred area for more intensive land uses. The proposed CFPUD known as New Hope
MinisU'ies wHl decrease the intensity of the land use which is currently zoned Neapolitan Park
PUD.
Con: Nonc,
Finding~: Any petition for a change in land use is revicwcd for in compliance with the GMP
and tbe LDC with the Board of County Commissioners ultimately ruling what uses and density
01' intensity is approved or denied. This petitioner is proceeding through the proper channels to
obtain the Board ruling.
14, Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborbood or the
Counly;
Dccemher 6, 2007 CCPC Hearing
Page 4 of6
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 23 of 186
Exhibit A
Pro: The project's development regulations provided in the CFPUD document are similar to
what is allowable in the LDC,
Con: None,
Findings: The proposed rezone is being requested as an expansion of an existing church (Res.
91-3 & 91-804) is consistent with tile County's Growth Management Plan, and as such will be
in scale with the needs oflhc neighborhood and the County.
15. Whether it is impossible to tind other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
Pro: There are many sites which are zoned to accommodate tile proposed development.
However, this proposal is a request to expand an existing facility that has been at its location
for 16 years,
Con: None.
Findings: Each zoning petition is reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and
the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The
evaluations of zoning are consistency with all elements of the GMP, compatibility, adequacy of
infmstructure and general compliance with the LDC.
16. The physical characteristics of the propcrty and the degree of site altCl'atitm which would
be required to make thc 1)I'opcrty usable fOI' any of the range of potentialllses under the
proposed zoning classificatioll.
Pro: The proposed change will not hinder the achievement of the county's goal for public
health, safcty and wclfare which will not be adversely affected, The subject property is located
within the Lcly Canal Drainagc Basin according to the Collier County Drainage Atlas, The
proposed outfall for the project is the Davis Boulevard roadside ditch located along the south
property line of the project.
Con: Environmental Services staff The project is inconsistent with CCME policy 6, 1.1 (5)b, in
that the project [ailec.l to provide evidence that the stOl'lnwater discharge into the upland
preserves will not result in adverse impacts on the naturally occurring native vegetation..
Findings: As noted in the CFPUD document, the project development is plmmed to protect the
functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge Ul'eas as
described in Objective 1,5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element.
17. The impact of development 011 the al'ailability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Managemcnt
Plan and as dcfined and implemented through the Collier County LDC rcgarding
Adequate Publie Facilities.
Pro: There is no development impacts on the parcel therefore the availability of adequate
publie facilities and services will not be affected.
Con: None.
December 6, 2007 CCPC Hearing
Page50f6
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 24 of 186
Exhibit A
Findings: During the application process staff reviewed all elements of the GMP and the LDC
public facilities requirements and found it consistent and in compliance for zoning approval. A
final determination whether this project meets the fullrequiremenls of adeqnale public facilities
specifications will be determined as part of the development order approval process,
December 6, 2007 cepe Hearing
Page 6 of6
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 25 of 186
EXHIBIT B
REZONE FINDINGS FOR PUD
I'UDZ-2007-AR- 3601 Ncw Hope Ministries
Section 10,02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission
to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following critcria:
1. Tile suitability af tile area for the type and pattern af develapment prnpased in
relation to physical characteristics of tile land, sUl'rounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Pro: The proposed rezone is required to comply with all county regulations regarding
dminage, sewer, water and other utilities.
Con: Not applicable because the project is surrounded by residential and commercial
development that are all land uses permitted in the Urhan - Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict, and the property is located within Activity Center 6, and a
portion is designated Urban - Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center
Subdistrict. The proposed rezone to a community facility land use is compatible with the
surrotlllding land use.
Findings: The proposed change decreases density and the Ncw Hope Ministries CFPUD
will be in compliance with all county regulations; therefore the project is suitable fOl' the
area,
2, Adequacy of evidence af unified eontral and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or otller instruments, or for amcndmcnts in those proposed, particula,'ly as
they may relate to arrangements 01' provisions to be made for tile continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilitics that .re not to bc provided OJ'
maintained at public expense,
Pro; Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control.
Con: None
Findings: The New I-lope Ministries CFPUD document makes appropriate provisions for
continuing operation and maintenance of common areas,
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Developmcnt witb the goals, objectives
and policies of tbc Growth Management Plan (GMP).
Pro: Staff has reviewed the petition and provided an analysis of the rezone amendment
and found the proposed rezone is consistcnt with the Growth Management Plan (OMP),
Con: None
Findin~s; The proposed rezone is consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the
OMP. The staff report expounds in detail of how the project is deemed consistent with
the GMP.
Deccmbor 6, 2007 eepe Headug
Page I nf3
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 26 of 186
EXHIBIT B
4, The intel-JIll I and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvcments, l'estrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requkements,
Pro: The proposed rezone CFPUD doeument ineorporated design and buffering
requiremenlq, Additional buffering requirements might be incorporated dUl'ing the
development order proeess.
Con: None.
Findin~s: Staff analysis indicated that the petition is eompatible, both internally and
externally with the proposed uses and with the sUl'l'ounding uses,
5, The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Pro: The amount of open space set aside by the CFPUD Document (thirty percent) is
consistent with the provisions of the LDC and GMP,
Con: None.
Findings: In addition to the thhty percent open space requirement, the proposed area for
parking will not be impervious, therefore, the appearance of open space will be greater
then the required thirty pereent.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assul'ing the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Pro: Tile timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements is not
a significant problem.
Con: None.
j"iXLdings: The proposed CFPUD will not adversely impact the timing or sequence of
development that is currently allowed in the area, Furthermore, the stipulation of
approval for this project will ensure that the wetland impacts will be avcrtable and where
unavoidable wetland impacts occur the stipulation will minimize to the maximum extent
practicable, while still meeting the overall project purpose,
7, The ability of' the subject property and of surrounding ar'eas to accommodate
expansion.
Pro: The petition does not add density to the neighborhood and as a result the subject
property will not increase traffic 01' add adverse impacts to other public facilities,
Con: None.
Dccembel' 6,2007 eepe Heal'ing
Page:2 of3
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 27 of 186
EXHIBIT B
Findings: Infrastructure is in place on the prope1ty and in the vicinity,
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, 01' as to desil'able modifications of such
regulations in the llarticular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meetiug public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulatiolls.
PI'O: Staff has reviewed this petition for adequate public services and levels of service
and found it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) land use designation
and meets the regulations of the GMP,
Con: None
Findings: The proposed PUD document conforms to PUD regulations and the requested
deviation has been through staff analysis and found acceptable,
Decembcl' 6, 2007 eepe He.ring
pnge 3 oD
co 00'" ~ ~~
00000
.O~
ON_ Z
Z .0 0
r-~CO w-
0:: N !::!;c
2cm ",0
-mOl g
ro::l ro ~
uco... ~ a..
em ~
w, .
Dl ~S . <(
<( S
. . ~
CD
Z
-
" Z
.-
" 0
e
" N
" ! ~.i
.. "
~I "''''i 6
il
"
"
.. ,I .
'" >
g ~! ~ ~
0
~ e '"
l '"
"'
(llf'o'A:flroe Vlh'6I:Mi V~tm <(
~ " '"
s:l>/V1311lf1S)lHE 6 6 0
aOd 0
'"
_m~ I I- L
::J
a.
..
!.~ z
0
!! f-
! .l~ I f-
i. i~ . II w
,I .j! a.
~; !fl I " · n~
I il ~I' I. I
-= ! 1 ! I
-~'"""" a..
! III bZ ! II III " <(
i w ! w Q ~l ; II ~
I ~[;; " ~ ~ Ii ~l ~~ ~ l' " "
C!I j>:: ! la . I
, .1
! Z 13 lL g ~! ! -ri!
OJ 'I Z
0
. ill: 0
~ -
;
" . f-
<(
Ii: U
I 0
...J
"
ld I!.
. i i !~
~p
n
I
!~
I~
~oo~
(i)
Agenda Item No..8B
January 29,2008
Page 29 of 186
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
Tu be completed hy stllff
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) DWIGHT POWE~~, NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC.
ADDRESS 7675 DAVIS BLVD CITY NAPLES STATE FL
ZIP 34104
TELEPHONE # (2391348-0122
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
CELL #
FAX # .... (239)3~-013'
NAME OF AGENT TIM HANCOCK. AICP, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.
ADDRESS 2154 TRADE CENTER WAY SUITE 3 CITY NAPLES STATE FL
ZIP 34109
TELEPHONE #.J2391 597-3916
CELL #
FAX # [2391597-5195
E-MAIL
ADDRESS: TIMailDA VIDSONENGINeE!UNG.COM
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 30 of 186
~. ,-c
. .....---. ....,...--......,.... ...--...---
ASSOCIAiJONSc:,_:_~--
}' ]
Complete the following for all Association(s} affiliated with this petition. Provide additional
sheets if necessary.
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIATION: JAMES PASCHAL. COUNTRYSIDE MASTER ASSOCIATION
MAILING ADDRESS _{l00 COUNTRYSI!l~DR
CITY NAP LES
ST ATE.J'L ZIP 34104
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIATION: KEN DRUM, EAST NAPLES CIVIC ASSOCIATION
MAILING ADDRESS 8404 MALLOW LANE
CITY NAPLES
STATE.J'L ZIP 34113
r-
" . Disclosure of Interest information_
-,--.._,-,_.--.-.-.........-...
-.-.._,....-..,.......-.
...........--...----"--
-1
P' ,
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
lenoncy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with on ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name ond Address
Percentage af Ownership
N/A
Applicalion For Public He<lring For PUD Rezone 6/14104
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 31 of 186
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Dwiaht Powell. Adminstrator
New Hope Ministries Inc.
7675 Davis Boulevard. Naples. FL 34104
NaDles. FL 34104
100 (Non-Profit Ora.)
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with Ihe
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
Percentage of Owne,ship
N/A
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
_N/A
Application For Public Hearing, For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 32 of 186
e. IF there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the controct purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
N/A
Date of Contract:
F_ IF any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or oFFicers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name ond Address
g, Date subject property acquired ~ July 2000 leased 0
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Dale of option:
Date option terminates:
Anticipated closing date
, or
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing,
il is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his beha If, to submit
a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Application For Puhlic Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
".;:;,";::,:,i:::~,~:~~' ,:,~:, ~.. . .
-PROPERlY LOCATION.::'
Agenda Item No, 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 33 of 186
,.,,';.....j
.' :;hI:,
I
.-'-''''C:'"".;"
Detailed le!!al description of the property covered bv the application: (If space is inadequate, attach
on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal
description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey
(completed within the last six months, maximum I" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-
application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning
the legal description, on engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Secti on/T ownship IRa nge
4
I 50 South
Subdivision:
I 26 East
lot:
Plat Book
Block:
Page #:
Property I.D.#:
Metes & Bounds Description: The West ,/, of Ihe Southeast V. of the S<1-uthwest '/4 and the East ,/, of the
Southwest V. of the Southwest V. both of Section 4. Townshi" 50 South. Ranae 26 East. Collier Countv
Florida. less and exce!>t the south 75 feet.
Size of pl'Operty: 1352
ft. X 1285 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 1.737.608
Acres
:1:39.89
Address/2enerallocation of subiect propcrtv: The subiect propcrtv is locate.9 on the north side of Davis
Blvd approx. 700' east of Santa Barbal'"J;lIvd.
PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): 0 Residential 0 Community Facilities
o Commercial 0 Industrial
~------,._...
dst~.1i,,_~:}:!;.i::~.;;~_::?;!':,.E;!"};:,I~!~mg':tm~~;';i~~~~'~t.:; ~
..' ADj;4.:CENT ZONING ~ LANitlisE':
"..1
Zoning
Land u,e
N
A
MulitFamilv Home,Nacant
Davis Blvd then Vacant/Communilv Facilities
Wildwood Estates Condos
Convenience Store & Vacant Commercial
SROW then A/C-3
E PUD
W PUD
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? IF so,
give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space Is inadequate, attach on
separale page). No
Section IT ownshi p IRange
1--1
Lot:
Block:
Subdivi,ion:
Plat Book_ Page #:
Metes & Bounds Description:
Property I.D.#:
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rez.one 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 34 of 186
I....
,___n_...,_... ..
_d_..,.",_.., ,.
.-------..-.,....,--.
· ..REZONE REQUEST
.......-...-....---.....
. _m........ ,,'.'.'.
I
This application is requesting a rezone from the Aaricultrual and PUD
zoning
district(s) to the CFPUD
%oning district(s).
Present Use of the Property: Churcll on East half and vacont land on west Ilalf.
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Church and related uses.
Original PUD Name: NeaJl!ili!gn Park Ordinance No,: 90-06
I
.........,.--......,..........
.._.m._...__....-",.... _
....___ ___'_.n
EV ALUA TIONCRlTERIA
"'__".H...._.,_,__,,_,_...
......-.....'..0.'"'.
.1
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing tho ro%one request with specific reference to the criteria noted
below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Considerations aDC Section 10.02.13.8\
1. The suitability of tile area for the type and paltern of development proposed in relation ta
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water,
and atller utilities.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, parlicularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
]. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, whicll conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of avai lable
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Applicalioll For Public Hearing For pun Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29. 2008
Page 35 of 186
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Deed Restriction~l The County is legolly precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communities have adopted sucn restrictions. You may wish to contoct the civic or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requested 1n order to Clscertaln whether or not the request is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use Detitions on the sublect DroDertv: To your knowledge, has 0 public hearing been held
on this property within the last year? 0 Yes 0 No
If so, what was the noture of thot hearing?
NOTICE:
This applicofion will be considered "open" when the determinotion of "sufficiency" has been made and
Ihe opplicotion is ossigned 0 petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed"
when the petitioner withdraws the opplication through written notice or ceases to supply necessory
information to continue processina or of her wise actively pursue the rezonina for a period of six 16\
months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application
"closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re-
opened by submitting a new ap plication, repa yment of all applicotion fees and gronfing of 0
determination of Ilsufficiency", Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code.
(LDC Section 10.03.05.Q.)
Application For Public Hcaring For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
ST A TEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 36 of 186
In" .'
,,-...... ...-- '.,-.
,,_, ..,_......n..
__..n.....____.
. . 'AI'!,~ICAII(TJN~QRMATlQN"
...1
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S)
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE #
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
CITY
STATE
FAX #
ZIP
CELL #
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE), __~nn'.
I
........._'....'n.-.-......_._
,""....",..",".".
-....,-.,-,.,..,,,,..
.' LEGAL DE$cR:iPTior('. un ...
'.......'n,.,'....'.;.,.
......._-....,_...---.
.,-",-,-".,--,,,
n. I
Secti onjT ownshipjRange
I
/
Lot:
Plat Book
Block:
Page #:
Subdivision:
Property I.D_#,
Metes & Bounds Description:
I.... . . TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSALTO BE PROVIDED
(Check applicable system):
. 1
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPO capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM
o
o
o
o
o
....._.m_._......m.___.-.-
_ '_'_P_P'" n. _
-...,...... -......"....
-----...__.._._,.~., - ...
.TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BEPRoviDEO"
"':""';";':1
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM 0
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM 0
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) 0
Application ror Public Hearing For PUD Rer.one 6/14/04
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29,2008
Page 37 of 186
:rOTAlPOpu'LA:TioriiToBE SERVED:
P~~K;AijQ'iAy~~~~~'j)A[(Yi~~MA';'J>~1
A. WATER-PEAK AVERAGE DAilY
B. SEWER-PEAK AVERAGE DAilY
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COlliER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED
NAgiAJ!),l~,'.~r.&..J"EM~NI( Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
~Q~(!Elf:!::Q(jNfY:l';fi~ITY;D~PICAfli)Nh~'tAfEMEl'{t; If the project is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage
collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these faciiities
in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement
shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and
connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building
permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to
dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
STA'rEMENTtOF AVAitABllITY;CAPAcrrV.,'FROM' OtHEif'PROVIDER S:;Uniess waived or
,_."........_... ,',_ '_'., ,_...........,..._-".".,._,..,..., C"..__'_'_.c"," """.,."..."",.,,-,,"'.';'.';'.'.;., ',,'-',.,',-"","_-..-_._._, .. _ ,,- ....._......_'..m..'....,..,-,OO....'.,.,'"....O.,;_'..",.-_".,.,..',....;"""...' .",
otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating that there Is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
Appliclltion For Public He~ring For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29,2008
38 of 186
We/I, ...~_ being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/I
am/are the owners of the property described herein and which Is the subject matter of the proposed
hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest
information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this
application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the
information requested on this application must be compiete and accurate and that the content of this
form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be
advertised until this application is deemed compiete, and all required information has been submitted
As property owner We/I further authorize
our/my representative In any matters regarding this Petition.
to act as
Signature of Property Owner
Signature of Property Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ..J
200---, by who is personCllly known to me or has produced
as identification.
State of Florida
County of Collier
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
ApplicCltiOl1 For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29. 2008
6
A TIS is required unless waived at the pre-application meeting. The TIS required may be either a
major or minor as determined at the pre-application meeting. Please note the following with regard to
TIS submittals:
MINOR TIS: Generally required for rezone requests for property less than 10 acres In size, although
based on the intensity or unique character of a petition, a major TIS may be required for petition of
ten acres or less.
MAJOR TIS: Required for all other rezone requests.
A minor TIS shall include the following,
1.
Trip Generation:
(at build-out)
Annual Average Daily Traffic
Peak Hour (AADT)
Peak Season Daily Traffic
Peak Hour (PSDT)
2,
Trip Assignment:
Within Radius of Development Influence (RDI)
3. Existing Traffic: Within RDI
AADT Volumes
PSDT Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
4. Impact of the proposed use on affected major thoroughfares, including any anticipated
changes in level of service (LOS).
5. Any proposed improvements (to the site or the external right-of-way) such as providing or
eliminating an ingress/egress point, or providing turn or decellanes or other improvements.
6. Describe any proposal to mitigate the negative Impacts on the transportation system.
7. For Rezones Only: State how this request is consistent with the applicabie policies of the Traffic
Circulation Elemellt(TCE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), including policies 1.3, 1.4,
4.4,5.1,5.2,7.2 and 7.3.
A Major TIS shall address all of the items listed above (for a Minor TIS, and shall also include all
analysis of the following:
1. Intersection Analysis
2. Background Traffic
3. Future Traffic
4. Through Traffic
5. Planned/Proposed Roadway Improvements
6. Proposed Schedule (Phasing) of Development
Applic~lIion For Public Heming For PUD RC7nlle 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
6
The following standards shall be used In prepa ring a TIS for submittal in conjunction with a conditional
use or rezone petition:
1. TriD Generation: Provide the total traffic generated by the project for each link within the
project's Radius of Deveiopment Influence (RDI) in conformance with the acceptable traffic
engineering principles. The rates published in the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report shall be used unless documentation by the petitioner or the
County justifies the use of alternative rates.
2. TriD Assianment: Provide a map depicting the assignment to the network, of those trips generated
by the proposed project. The assignment shall be made to all links within the RDI. Both onnual
average and peak seasonal traffic should be depicted.
3. Existinq Traffic: Provide a map depicting the current traffic conditions on all links within the RDI.
The AADT, PSDT, and LOS shall be depicted for all links within the RDI.
4. Level of Service (LOS): The LOS of a roadway shall be expressed in terms of the applicable
Collier County Generalized Daily Service Volumes as set forth in the TCE of the GMP.
5. Radius of Development Influence (RDIl: The TIS shall cover the leClSt of the following two
areas.:
a) an area as set forth below; or,
b) the area in which traffic assignments from the proposed project on the major
thoroughfares exceeds one percent of the LOS "C".
Land Use
Distance
Residential
5 Miles or as required by DRI
Other (commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.)
o - 49, 999 Sq. Ft. 2 Miles
50,000 - 99, 999 Sq. Fl. 3 Miles
100,000 - 199, 999 Sq. Ft. 4 Miles
200,000 - 399, 999 Sq. Ft 5 Miles
400,000 & up 5 Miles
In describing the RDi the TIS shall provide the measurement in road miles from the proposed
project rather than a geometric radius.
6. Intersection Analvsis: An intersection analysis is required for all intersections within the RDI where
the sum of the peak-hour critical lane volume is projected to exceed 1,200 Vehicles Per Hour
(VPH).
Application For Pl1blic Hearing For PUD Rezolle 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 41 of 186
7. Background Traffic: The effects of previously approved but undeveloped or partially
developed projects which may affect major thoroughfares within the RDI of the proposed
project shall be provided. This information shall be depicted on a map or, alternatively, in a
listing of those projects and their respective characteristics.
8. Future Traffic: An estimate of the effects of traditional increases In traffic resulting from
potential development shall be provided. Potential development is that which may be
developed maximally under the effective Future land Use Element (FLUE) and the Collier
County Land Development Code. This estimate shall be for the projected development areas
within the projects RDI. A map or list of such lands with potential traffic impact calculations shall
be provided.
9. Throu9h Traffic: At a minimum, increases in through traffic shall be addressed through the year
2015. The methodoiogy used to derive the estimates shall be provided. It may be desirable to
include any additional documentation and backup data to support the estimation as well.
10. Planned!ProDosed Roadwav Improvements: All proposed or planned roadway
Improvements located within the RDi should be identified. A description of the funding
commitments shall also be included.
11. Proiect Phasina: When a project phasing schedule is dependent upon proposed roadway
improvements, a phasing schedule may be included as part of the TIS. If the traffic Impacts of
a project are mitigated through a phasing scheduie, such a phasing schedule may be made a
condition of any approval.
Applicfilioll For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
6
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Application information must be clearly printed or typed. All material must be legible and completed
in full. All requirements must be submitted as indicated below, unless otherwise determined during the
pre-application meeting.
GENERAL APPLICATION
To be completed in full.
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
Provide copies of notes taken at pre-application meeting
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST FORM
Must be completed and approved by the Addressing Department, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,
Naples, Florida 34104. Phone (239) 403-2482, FAX [239) 659-5724
PUD DOCUMENT
Refer to LDC Section 10.02.13 for required information
DIGITAL REQUIREMENTS
An electronic version of all plans and documents on CDROM as part of the submittal package.
FEES
Required fees in accordance with current Fee Schedule. Check shall be made payable to: Collier
County Board of Commissioners.
Application Fee
~ PUD Rezone = $10,000 + $25 per acre
~ PUD to PUD Rezone = $8,000 + $25 per acre
Comprehensive Plcmning Consistency Review = $2,250
legal Advertising Fees
~ BCC = $363
~ CCPC = $729
Fire Code Review = $150
EIS Review = $1,600
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT lEIS)
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 10.02.02. of the land Development
Code (lDC) , or a request for waiver if appropriate.
Application for Public HC<lring For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
AERIAL PHOTO Page 43 of 186
Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous
twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, sholl be submitted. Said aerial shall
identify plant and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with
Fiorida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification Sysiem. Additionally,
a calcuialion of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation
and location(s) of the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section
3.05.07).
BOUNDARY SURVEY
Boundary Survey, no more than six months old, abstracted, signed, seaied and prepared by a Florida
registered land surveyor, showing the location and dimensions of all property lines, existing streets or
roads, easements, rights-of-way, and areas dedicated to the public.
Survev shall be accomDanied either by an Attorney's ODinion of Tille, or bv a sworn
statement from the DroDerty owner(s) stating that he or she has provided sufficient information to
the surveyor to allow the Clccurate depiction of the informCltion on the survey.
HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
A historical and archeological surveyor waiver application if property is iocated within an area of
historical or archaeological probability (as Identified at pre-application meeting)
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
If this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide twenty (20) copies (this includes: HUI if
affordable housing, Joyce Ernst, if residential and Immokalee/Water Sewer District, if in Immokalee)
of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan [and one reduced BV," x 11" copy of site plan], drawn to a
maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depleting the following [Additional copies of the plan may
be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisory
boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board (EAB), or CCPC};
. all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof,
. provisions for existing and/or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and
egress to the site and the structure(s) on site),
. all existing and/or proposed parking and ioading areas [include matrix indicating required
and provided parking and loading, including required parking for the disabled],
. required yards, open space and preserve areas,
. proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the site),
. proposed and/or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County
OWNER/AGENT AFFIDAVIT
Affidavit signed by owner authorizing agent to act as representative. Must be signed and notarized.
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
WARRANTY DEED
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29,2008
Page 44 of 186
A copy of the last recorded deed, contract for sale or agreement for saie, or a notarized statement of
ownership clearly demonstrating ownership and control of the subject lot or parcel of land.
ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING
Architectural rendering of any proposed structures
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS)
Unless waived at the pre"application meeting, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) must be submitted. Pleme refer
to ottached TIS stondords.
UTILITY PROVISIONS STATEMENT
A copy of the Utliity Provisions Statement with required attachments and sketches" Pieose refer to
attached form.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
Including all Appendices and Exhibits
PERMITS
Copies of State and/or Federal permits
POSTAL SERVICE LETTER OF NO OBJECTION
Provide a copy of the letter notifying the U.S. Postal Service of the proposed project. The letter
should be addressed to:
Robert M. Skebe
U.S. Postal Service
1200 Goodlette Road
Napies, Florida 34102-9998
NEIGHBORHOOR INFORMATIONAL MEETING (NIM)
Required per LDC Section 10.03.05.E. Please see attachment for requirements.
OTHER
Any ad ditional requirements as may be appllca ble to specific conditional uses and identified during
the pre-application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits.
CONTINUANCE FEES
In accordance with Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Fee Schedule,
when land use petitions are continued, the following fees will appiy:
Two days or less prior to meeting = $500
Requested at the meeting = $750
Additional required advertising charged in addItion to continuance fees
BE ADVISED THAT SECTION 10.03.05.B.3 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES AN APPLICANT TO
REMOVE THEiR PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IS) AFTER FINAL ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMtSSIONERS. BASED ON THE BOARD'S FINAL ACTION ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE REMOVE ALL PUBLIC HEARING
ADVERTISING SIGN(S} IMMEDIATELY.
App1ic~tjOl1 For Pub-lie Heming For PUD Rezone 6114/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
6
Applicant must conduct at ieast one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff
review and comment on the application and before the Public Hearing Is scheduled with the
Planning Commission.
Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to all property owners who are required to receive
iegal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.02.' 2.C.
Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose
members are impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the
County to be notified.
A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be
furnished to the Zoning Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less
than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled date of the NIM.
The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be
reasonably convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the
facilities must be of sufficient size to accomlllodate expected attendance.
The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspa per where
legal notices and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the
meeting cmd legibie site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being
requested. The dispiay advertisement must be one-fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point
and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7)
days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM.
The Collier County staff planner assigned to the proiect must attend the NIM and shall serve as the
facilitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it
intends to develop the subject property.
The applicant Is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a
copy to the Zoning Department.
As a result of mandated meetings with the pubiic, any commitments made by the applicant shall be
reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning
Department. These written commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's
review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of
approval.
Application For Public Heuring For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
6
No. of Cocies
024*
024*
024*
01
024
01
02-
01*
04
05*
04
07
04
04
04
04
04
01
01
02
o
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET
Check here if "01 reQuired
Completed Application 0
Pre-Application Meeting Notes 0
Legible Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" 0
Conceptual Site Plan B v." X 11" 0
PUD Document and Master Plan 0
24" x 36" Master Plan 0
Warranty Deed or Contract for Sale 0
Owner/Agent Affidavit, signed & nolarized 0
Environmental Impact Statement or waiver 0
Aerial Photos with Habitat Areas Identified 0
Utility Provisions Statement with Sketches 0
Traffic Impact Statement or waiver 0
Historical Surveyor waiver 0
Architectura I Rendering of Proposed Structures 0
Boundary Survey, no more than 6 months 0Id(24" x36") 0
Copies of State and/or Federal Permits 0
Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, if applicable 0
Electronic Copy of PUD Document & Plans 0
Copy of Leiter notifying the U.S. Postal Service of project 0
Addressing Checkiist
Required Fees
It One mlditi01wl copy reqllil'et! if for Affimltlble lloWihtg
As the authol'ized agcut/applicant for this pctition, I attest that all of the information indicatcd on
this checklist is inclnded in this snhmittal package. I undcrstand that failurc to include all
necessary submittal information may result in the delay of (ll'Ocessing this pctition.
Agcnt/ APlllicallt Signature
Datc
Application For Public Hearing For pun Rezone 6114/04
ORDINANCE NO. 08-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE WlIICH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA TO AMEND THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING TIm ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY
FROM RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT
(APPROVED WITH A PROVISIONAL USE FOR A
CHURCH BY RESOLUTION NUMBER 91-3) AND THE
NEAPOLITAN PARK PLANNED UNlT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A CFPUD ZONh'lG
DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS THE NEW HOPE
MINISTRIES CFPIJD LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF DAVIS BOULEVARD (CR-84) AND EAST OF SANTA
BARBARA BOULEY ARD, IN SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONSISTING OF 37.95'" ACRHS; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 90-6. AS AMENDED,
THE NEAPOLITAN PARK PUD; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tim Hancock, of Davidson Engineering, Incorporated. representing New
Hope Ministries, Incorporated, petitioned the. Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of the subject real property as part of Petition PUDZ~2003-AR-3601.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 4,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida, is changed from a Rural
Agricultural (A) Zoning District with an approved provi.sional use for a church by Resolution
Number 91-3 and the Neapolitan Park Planned Uoit Dt:.\lelopment (PUD) Zoning District to a
Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zotlillg District for a project to be
known as the New Hope Ministries CFPUD in accordance with the CFPUD Document attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by referenc.c herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or
maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Laud
Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance Number 90-6, as amended, known as the "Neapolitan Park" PUD, adopted on
January 23, 1990. by the Board of County Commissioner'S of Collier CountYl is hereby repealed
in its ~ntirely.
Page I of2
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 47 of 186
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 48 of 186
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Departme.nt of State,
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by ,uper-majority vote of the Bourd of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of__
.2008.
ArrEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Deputy Clerk
By:
TOM HENNING. CHAIRMAN
Approved as to Form
and Legal Sufficiency
I'Q'\~arjorie Student-Stirling
Assistant County Attorney
Page 2 uf 2
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 49 of 186
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES CFPUD
A COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PREPARED FOR:
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC.
7675 DAVIS BOULEVARD
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
PREPARED BY:
DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.
3530 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 301
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105
DATE FILED January 7.2003
DATE REVISED June 7.2007
DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC December 6,2007
DATE APPROVED BY BCC
ORDINANCE NUMBER
EXHIBIT A
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 50 of 186
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 2
SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 3
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5
SECTION III COMMUNITY FACILITY AREAS PLAN 6
SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS PLAN 9
SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 10
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT "A"
CFPUD MASTER PLAN
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 51 of 186
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development of approximately 39.89:t acres of property in Collier County, as a
Community Facility Planned Unit Development to be known as New Hope Ministries
CFPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County
as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The community
facilities of the New Hope Ministries CFPUD will be consistent with the growth policies,
land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for
the following reasons:
1. The project development is compatible and complimentary to surrounding land
uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element.
2. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the
Land Development Code (LDC) as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land
Use Element.
3. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage
features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in
Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element.
4. The project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Subdistrict and Urban Mixed Use District, Activity Center Subdistrict on the
Future Land Use Map. The Urban designation allows for a variety of community
facilities including churches.
2
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29,2008
Page 52 of 186
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the
property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be
developed under the project name of New Hope Ministries CFPUD.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The subject property being 39.89:t acres, is located in Section 4, Township 50
South, Range 26 East, and is fully described as:
The West half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,
less and except the South 75 feet for purposes of road right-of-way.
The East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less and
except the South 75 feet for purposes of road right-of-way.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The subject property is owned by New Hope Ministries Incorporated, a Florida
not-for-profit corporation, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34104.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA
A. The subject property is located on the north side of Davis Boulevard,
approximately 700 feet east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, Collier County,
Florida.
B. The eastern half of the subject property is zoned Agricultural with an
approved Provisional Use, that allows the existing church facilities, and
the western half is zoned PUD, Neapolitan Park, approved by Collier
County Ordinance No. 90-6.
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The project site is primarily located within the Lely Canal Drainage Basin
according to the Collier County Drainage Atlas. The proposed outfall for the
project is the Davis Boulevard roadside ditch located along the south property
line of the project.
3
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 53 of 186
Natural ground elevatjon varies from 12.0 NGVD within the on-site wetland areas
to 13.0 NGVD at the CR-951 right-of-way line constituting the west property line;
average site elevation is 12.4 NGVD. The entire site is located within FEMA
Flood Zone "X" with no base flood elevation specified.
The water management system of the project proposes the construction of a
perimeter berm with crest elevation set at or above the 25-year, 3-day peak flood
stage. Water quality pretreatment is proposed in the on-site lake/native
vegetation areas prior to discharge.
Per Collier County Soil Legend dated January 1990, the soil type found within the
limits of the property is predominately #14 - Pineada Fine Sand, Limestone
Substratum and #21 - Boca Fine Sand.
The site vegetation consists primarily of slash pine, cabbage palm, and cypress
trees with upland areas of slash pine and saw palmetto. The site is infested with
melaleuca trees.
1.6 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "New Hope Ministries
Community Facility Planned Unit Development Ordinance".
4
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 54 of 186
SECTION II
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project
plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the
respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project
relationships.
2.2 GENERAL
A. Regulations for development of the New Hope Ministries CFPUD shall be
in accordance with the contents of this Document, CFPUD - Community
Facility Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections
and parts of the LDC and GMP in effect at the time of issuance of any
development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the
construction of improvements. Where these CFPUD regulations fail to
provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar
district in the LDC shall apply.
B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as
the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit
application.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The New Hope Ministries CFPUD will be developed for church facilities including
but not limited to a sanctuary and related accessory uses.
2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural
improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology
for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities.
2.5 TEMPORARY FACILITIES
A. Temporary trailers may be placed on the site after site development plan
(SDP) approval for administrative, storage, and caretaker uses, subject to
LDC requirements.
5
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 55 of 186
SECTION III
COMMUNITY FACILITY AREAS PLAN
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The New Hope Ministries CFPUD will be developed for church facilities with a
sanctuary and related accessory uses.
3.2 PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Churches and houses of worship, not to exceed 4,200 seats.
2. Any other use deemed comparable in nature by the Board of
Zoning Appeals.
B. Permitted Accessorv Uses and Structures:
1. Customary accessory uses and structures includjng child and adult
day care facilities and adminjstrative offices.
2. Recreational uses and facilities including but not limited to
swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, athletic fields, tot
lots, boat docks, walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings,
special event areas, and basketball/shuffle board courts.
3. In conjunction with the church, a bookstore, educational classes,
recording studio, printing shop, counseling center, and church
bus/van parking area (all such uses shall be related to and
incidental to the church).
4. Gatehouse.
5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and
maintenance facilities.
6. Water management facilities.
7. Any other accessory use deemed comparable by the process
outlined in the LDC.
6
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 56 of 186
3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the New
Hope Ministries CFPUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured
as follows:
1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the
setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line.
2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is
measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel
is served by a platted private drive, the setback is measured from
the road easement or property line.
TABLE I
COMMUNITY FACILITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Requirements Principal Use Accessory Use
Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet N/A
Minimum Lot Width 80 feet N/A
Maximum Height 3 stories not to 35 feet
exceed 48 feet
Minimum Building Setbacks
. Front yard 25 feet 25 feet
. Side yard 15 feet 10 feet
. Rear yard 15 feet 10 feet
. CFPUD boundary 25 feet 10 feet 2
. Lake' 20 feet 20 feet
. Preserve 25 feet 10 feet
. Distance between structures 15 feet 10 feet
'Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake.
225 feet where abutting residentially developed or zoned properties
7
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 57 of 186
B. Landscapina and Bufferina Reauirements:
1. If landscape buffers are determined to be necessary adjacent to
wetland preserve areas, they shall be separate from those preserve
areas.
2. All landscape buffers shall be as required by the LDC except as
noted in Section 5.10 of this Document.
8
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 58 of 186
SECTION IV
PRESERVE AREAS PLAN
4.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the
Preserve Areas as generally shown on Exhibit "A", CFPUD Master Plan. A
minimum of 5.67 acres of Native Vegetation Area shall be provided.
4.2 PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than the following subject to permitting:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Passive recreational areas.
2. Non-paved biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks.
3. Water management structures required by permitting agencies.
4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries.
5. Supplemental landscape planting, screening and buffering within
the Native Vegetation Areas, may be approved after Environmental
Services staff review. A minimum of 5.67 acres of Native
Vegetation Area shall be provided. All supplemental plantings
within the Preserve Areas shall be 100% indigenous native species
and shall meet the minimum planting criteria set forth in the LDC.
9
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 59 of 186
SECTION V
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Sectjon is to set forth the commitments for the development
of this project.
5.2 GENERAL
All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with approved SDPs, and all
applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this
CFPUD, in effect at the time of plat, first SDP approval or building permit
application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated
otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County LDC shall apply
to this project even if the land within the CFPUD is not to be platted. The
developer, its successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments
outlined in this Document.
The developer, its successor or assignee, shall follow the CFPUD Master Plan
and the regulations of this CFPUD as adopted and any other conditions or
modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition,
any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this
Document.
5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN
A. Exhibit "A", CFPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and
is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or
special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be
varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or SDP
approval.
B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be
granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service
utilities and all common areas in the project.
5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT
An SOP shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at time of site plan
submittal. The project is to be constructed in several additional phases.
A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed accordjng to the time
limits pursuant to LDC requirements.
10
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 60 of 186
B. Monitorjng Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted
pursuant to LDC requirements.
5.5 WATER MANAGEMENT
A. Prior to SDP approval, the petitioner shall dedicate to the County a sixty (60)
foot drainage and right-of-way easement along the property line fronting
Davis Boulevard. The easement shall be improved by the developer of this
property and shall have the following dimensions: a 15 foot flat travel way on
the north side, continue on a 4:1 slope 3 feet to elevation 7.5 feet NGVD,
having a 16 foot wide bottom and continuing up on a 4:1 slope for 3 feet to
the existing grade. This will leave 5 feet before the right-of-way line of Davis
Boulevard. This improvement shall be completed prior to the issuance of any
certificate of occupancy (CO).
B. This site shall be designed for 1 DO-year flood plain compensation using a 100-
year flood elevation of 10.8 feet NGVD.
C. The CFPUD Document and Master Plan shall show full water quality pre-
treatment volume before the stormwater reaches an elevation that would
have the lake overflow its banks and then backflow into the natural ground
areas (preserve).
5.6 TRAFFIC
A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement marking, and design criteria shall be in
accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of
Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards,
current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),
current edition.
B. Access points shown on the CFPUD Master Plan shall be considered to be
conceptual. The number of access points constructed may be less than the
number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall
be considered unless a PUD amendment is approved.
C. Site related improvements (as opposed to system related improvements)
necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier
County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All improvements necessary
to provide safe ingress and egress for construction-related traffic shall be in place
and operational prior to commencement of on-site construction.
D. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right-
in/right-out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of
ingress, a point of egress, or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis
11
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 61 of 186
for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer,
jts successor in title, or assignee. Collier County reserves the right to close any
median opening existing at any time whjch is found to be adverse to the health,
safety, and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but
not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity.
E. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County
rights-of-way or easement(s), then compensating right-of-way shall be provided
at no cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement(s) upon final
approval of the turn lane design during the review of the first subsequent
development order. The typical cross-section shall not differ from the existing
roadway unless approved, in writing, by the Transportation Division
Administrator, or his designee. The cost of installing or lengthening turn lanes to
serve the project shall be borne by the developer.
F. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, traffic signal(s), other traffic control
device, sign, pavement marking improvement within any public right-of-way or
easement, or site related improvements (as opposed to system related
improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as
determined by Collier County, is determined to be necessary, the cost of such
improvement shall be the responsibility of the developer, its successors or
assigns. The improvements shall be paid for or installed, at the County's
discretion, prior to the issuance of the appropriate, corresponding CO.
G. Land to be conveyed to the County for right-of-way or other public purposes
shall be so conveyed in fee simple by warranty deed or otherwise by easement
to the County within 60 days of Board of County Commissioner's approval of
the rezone petition, or upon approval of the final plat or SOP, whichever comes
first. In no event shall any building permit, right-of-way or drainage permit or
other development order be approved prior to the conveyance of the land,
unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
5.7 PLANNING
A. If during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction
activity an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development
within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be
immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement
Department contacted.
B. A minimum of 30% of the required parking spaces shall be pervious.
C. Non-compatible uses. It is recognized that there are uses and accessory
uses which, because of their very nature, have characteristics that do not
meet the compatibility criteria of this ordinance and thus adversely impact
adjacent areas. Special regulation of these uses is necessary to ensure
12
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 62 of 186
that these adverse impacts will not contribute to the blighting and
downgrading of the surrounding neighborhood.
Within 15 days from submittal of any SOP, it shall be within the discretion
of the County Manager or designee to refuse approval of such SOP if it
includes a use that, in the professional judgment of the County Manager of
designee, is not compatible with and has a potential to cause a deleterious
effect upon an adjacent neighborhood.
Notice of such refusal shall be promptly mailed to the applicant for the
SOP. Applicant and staff will meet at their earliest convenience to discuss
and attempt to amicably resolve the compatibility issues, which can
include, but is not limited to, moving the questioned use to another
location within the development.
Should the parties be unable to reach an amicable solution, the matter will
be promptly referred to the Collier County Planning Commission. At a
publicly noticed hearing, the Planning Commission will review the
proposed use make a finding as to (1) whether the proposed use was
intended for this site, as set forth in the zoning ordinance, and (2) whether
such use can be made compatible with the adjoining neighborhood
through the imposition of certain conditions or restrictions, including but
not limited to location the use to another location within the development,
buffering, limiting hours of operation, requiring a vestibule, walls, and
relocating dumpsters.
Should either the County or the applicant be unwilling to abide with the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the matter
will then be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for a public
hearing, to be conducted in the same manner as LOC section 10.08.00,
except that notice purposes 10 days prior notice by publication will be
sufficient.
5.8 ENVIRONMENTAL
A. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation
tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the
plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the
Florida Statutes. Setbacks shall be provided in accordance with the LOC.
In the event the project does not require platting, all conservation areas
shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements
dedicated to an approved entity and to Collier County with no
responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations
similar to or as per Florida Statutes.
13
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 63 of 186
5.9 FIRE REVIEW
A. No infrastructure shall be installed until proper permjts are applied for and
obtained.
5.10 DEVIATIONS
A. A deviation from Section 4.06.00 of the LDC is granted for the North and
East property lines eliminating the requirement for a wall along these
areas due to the location of the existing development and preserves.
Where preserves exist or are proposed, no additional buffering wjll be
required. All areas along the west and south property lines will comply with
the vegetation requirements of Type 'B' buffers.
14
rococo
COOCO
.O~
ON~
Z .0
Em",
NCO
~CQ)
ro~~
2~Q..
"',
:t
---- :t!-----..r
I
J~
:~
~",>~"",z,~p,~ I
ill,'" "_..,..FF'T 0= ~___=~ ,moo"
rl' ' -: "-",,~J i ~ i:::~"~~'-_--:-" - ". ,
jll"I'J i !!~::;:iJJ -, I !,n;2;:-}:::;~':;;;:'" ~ :!!
.1:::' I a. i/ _____--- V:.I" 'I',j ':"" ',,', . " r7' 1 I : III
"", . . ~.. ,'" ' .,..,......., I,~':I' 'I
'I. '.'.:: .' ' -', ,',:: (..'.... ' :. I I II , If I I ! I
',' , " .' ' ." ' "I ,,'" ,:1,:,
1:." i ",,,," . . ,,:r, !~~il[Oi'!fi,1 i 1:'1'
'I'" "" , " 1 I'
,,' ~_", .-,," ", "'" I'
. .' ,,' ' ,,,,,, '
"i: , <<1 ., '. ,Jei,", ,!:' 1 : I : , ,',
'i~! .......-.:,'.". II ," '''>4+,{:. !I}.:.~ .:: .", IfIll] I: 1"1'
.. "..,.! ",,' ,,,,'
W ",' "T'"
111"_ ~l J~::J "'}: , "
-
~ ,I I I
~ II . I I I '/ I 1
r II if V I I
I I I ~ I I
~~h
-- ~f=
II
"
fI
!
--=-=-......~
1
~! ~ ,. ~
~~2e'~" '
o.,'! 1,- ~,~ ~,
Zll 6~ ~<~pf.l.~~ ~~
'~~!~i~ .~~~I~~ ~~ l
>W~~~ no!'~~ g! I
~hl~8 l~'5g!~ ~. i
~f' ' ,.~"@:~ ~W !
w~~ ~ ~~9mHO~ ~m *
~,o>. .r~~'ii .r .
~~ t~<~b~: ~ ~ ~
~11.11~'~!.. ! il. ~
~~.,,1~i'!~~~ pI !
~~r~W,lH.i~. !
ffil~~~~~j5!~i' i! E
"~ c.I'~i'~~ .- 0
~~~*gg ~. 'I~I~~ l
z'1i5!~ d'll' .~~ '
~!<g ,.,,~~l
""3.;2 ~mb,i.'o~~,~!.
'. ..11. .o,p' .
~ _ ~~~~~.5 ~
~ g~;;;
,., .. .,.::I:j' ~
~", ~ '" '" i
~
U ~
~~w~~
.dc!lqlij
~~~~i
'l~d~,"
~'''P~
j::t:(d5~
u!:![,f~
.. ~
; (}:;,I ~
is, ~ ~
z' j ~
6 ~.,
~ i~.
,,~d
~.H
w ~~ ~
> "iw
~h~
~ ~
! i
!z ~ g
~ J I
~ 0';1 i ~
~11, I
ffi~ II I
I- U ; ~
~j 'ape
~td~
~;
Iii
~....~...
d
~ ~ ' j
~ ~ !'
m ,d
,~ ,'"
:ii' ;
'i "'
, ~!
. -
:(. ~ l!? I
:;l ."
i ~ ~
^' .
G
c
~
i!
!
,
i
!
I
~
~.
-g ~
i;ii!; ii'/d. ~
;:,:S!!2u(o
aw~~~
Il.O'-
~tl~g
;::'
w
Z
1.>>:....'."'''''ILW,......
""",",,"\d;>.'<)<JI'oladOll
1.....'OO.....".."",.,,.~on I
,~,.,"';)~JoOO'/D...tt1..~
, ...""Vj.....,~ "'''"1\''''''''''
UPfTl
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 65 of 186
Item
V.c.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5. 2007
I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT
Engineering Consultant:
Environmental Consultant:
PUDZ-2003-AR- 3601
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES - PHASE 2
DWIGHT POWELL, NEW HOPE
MINISTRIES INC
DA VlDSON ENGINEERING
W. DEXTER BENDER & ASSOCIATES,
INC.
Petition No.:
Petition Name:
Applicant/Developer:
II. LOCATION
The site is located on the north side of Davis Boulevard approximately 700 feet east
of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The West V, of the Southeast I;.; of the Southwest I;.; and
the East 1'2 of the Southwest I;.; of the Southwest I;.; both of the Section 4, Township
50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the south 75 feet.
III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Existing New Hope Ministries Church Agricultural (A) with a Provisional Use and
Undeveloped Neapolitan Park PUD Zoning.
N - Wildwood Estates PUD & Bembridge RPUD
Multi-family Structures
S - Davis Bouievard (SR-84)
Right -of-Way
E - Wildwood Estates PUD
Multi-family Structures
W - Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD
Existing Gas station & undeveloped parcels
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Rezone the subject 37.85 acre site comprising of ] 8.99 acres zoned "A" Agricultural
with an approved Provisional Use that peffilits the existing church facilities, and
]8.86 acres zoned PUD (undeveloped Neapolitan Park PUD approved for a mixture
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 66 of 186
Page 2 of 10
of intense commercial and residential land uses) to PUD, to permit a sanctuary and
church facilities.
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY
A. Future Land Use Element:
A portion of the subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict, and is located within an Activity Center Residential Density
Band, and a portion is designated Urban - Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity
Center Subdistrict. Relevant to this petition, both Districts allow a variety of
residential and non-residential uses, such as private or public schools, churches,
recreational and public facilities.
CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed uses
for the subject site may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
B. Conservation & Coastal Management Element:
Objective 2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth
Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries
shall meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality standards.
To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and cumulative
impacts of stormwater runoff, stonnwater systems should be designed in such a way
that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to
enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water ( discharge) to the estuarine
system.
This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to
mimic or enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing
interconnected dry detention areas, a lake. and a preserves to provide water quality
retention and peak flow attenuation dUling storm events.
The project is consistent with p0l1ion of Objective 6.].1 regarding mmmmm
preservation requirement as the project is preserving 5.73", acres of uplands and
wetlands on site, and meets the minimum 15% requirement of Policy 6. 1 .1. However,
there is a lack of consistency with Objective 6.1.1 in regards to the proposed use of
preserves as part of the stormwater system. At the pre-development conditions the
stormwater runoff has been flowing from the north of the property to south and
finally being discharged through a control structure into the FDOT right-of-way (for
Davis Blvd) where there is an existing canal. Before the storm water reaches the
existing canal it is held at the existing preserve].
2
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No 88
January 29,2008
Page 67 of 186
Page3 of 10
For post development, the proposed drainage plan shows the water flow being
directed. in the opposite direction of the predevelopment conditions, from south to
north by means of a series of conveyance swales and catch basins connected by
underground piping, The stonnwater runoff will bc directed back to the stonnwater
management lake. A I-day rainfall of 2.1 inches will produce I inch of runoff which
will be retained in the stonnwater system. Discharge to the preserve will occur when
rainfall amount is greater than 2.1 inches. The analysis provided by the applicant
induded an assessment for the period the water will be standing in the upland
preserves for the 25 year c, days event. However. an assessment for the period the
water will remain in the upland preserve at average rainfall conditions was not
provided. More detailed analysis follows in thc Site Description section of this repOli.
The project as proposed is not consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.1 (5) b.
The projcct is consistent with Policies (L2.1 and 6.2.2 of the ('CME in that the
wctlcUlds have becn nagged and :;urveyed and a jurisdictional determination has been
received from the SFWMD The project is consistent with Policy 6.2.6 "I' the ('('ME
In that there are I,,'cservc areas Identified as suet, on the pun Master Plan and the
PtJD requires the :;alne to be subject to ('onScrvatlOll eaSe111Cnts.
The project is consistent with the policies or tbe CCME regarding \vater quality !1l
tbat tbe stormwatcr management plan is designed to meet all applicable water quality
standards of the State and will be subject to ERP pennitting requirements of the
SFWMD.
The project contains two inactive red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) cavity trees.
The cavity trees have been inactive for eleven years. The project is consistent with
Policy 7.1.2 in that the cavity trees have been deemed abandoned by both the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service. In addition, any potential impacts to red-cockaded woodpecker habitat have
been compensated for through the purchase of 30 acres of known RCW habitat
within tbe Belle Meade Forest.
Habitat management and exotic vegetation removal/maintenance plans are required
at the time of Site Development PlanlConstlUction Plan submittal. Preserve areas
shall be required to be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as
defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council.
Littoral shelf planting areas within wet detention ponds shall be required as part of
Site Development Plan/Construction Plan submittal, and will be required to meet the
minimum planting area requirement in Policy 6.1.7.
The requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (ElS) pursuant to Policy
6.] .8 has been satisfied.
3
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 68 of 186
Page 4 of 10
Jurisdictional wetlands have been identif1ed as required in Policies 6.2. I and 6.2.2.
Pursuant to Policy 6.2.4. the County shall require appropriate agency pennits prior to
the issuance of a tlnal local development order pennitting site improvements (Site
Development Plan). As stated in Policies 6.2.3 and 6.2.4, where permits issued by
jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within the Urban Designated
Area and require mitigation for such impacts. this shall be deemed to meet the
objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and the natural functions of
wetlands within this area.
l\ wildlife survey for listed species in accordance with Policy 7.1.2 is included in the
Environmental Impact Statement lEIS). Wildlife habitat management plans fC)r listed
species are required at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan
submittal. the Site Devciopment Plan It)r the site in cmrently under revlcw.
VI. MAJOR ISSUES
.... Storm water Management:
Section X.U6.0.'\ 0.2. ill the Collier County f,alld Development Code stales "The
surface water management aspects of any petitioll. that is or will be reviewed and
pelmitted by South Florida Water Management District ISFWMD). are exempt Irol11
review by the EAC except to evaluate the criteria for allowing treated stormwater to
be discharged into Preserves as allowed in Section 3.05.07."
New Hope Ministries has received Surface Water Management and Water Use
Permits, numbers 11-0II74-S and 11-01463-W, from SFWMD and is presently in
for a general permit modification for this expansion from 19.01 acres to 39.89 acres,
but the EAC can evaluate the criteria for allowing treated stonnwater to be
discharged into the preserves. This site uses existing Native Preservation Areas as
part of their water management system. From the LiDAR topography, some of this
area appears to be an upland preserve.
The project is within the Lely Area Drainage basin and will be limited to an
allowable discharge rate of 0.06 cfs per acre per Collier County Ordinance 2001-27.
The master site plan submitted with the rezone application is sheet 5 of 15 (this
project is also under review for a Site Development Plan amendment # AR-8l68)
and it shows the construction of a county canal along Davis Blvd with a note that the
canal will be constructed per "Section F-F", which shows a wider, shallower canal
than the LASIP design cross-section.. The LASIP pernlit calls for a canal with a
bottom width of 3 ft and a bottom elevation of 5.0 NGVD and 3: 1 sideslopes. The
Section F-F shows a bottom width of approximately 16 ft and a bottom elevation of
7.5, and sideslopes of 4: I. There appears to be an existing ditch along the outside of
the west property line that conveys offsite flows from the parcels to the north to the
Davis Blvd canal. All flow in this basin is to the southwest. The final water
management design will be as per the SFWMD review.
4
EAC Meeting
jI,genda Item No. 88
.January 29, 2008
Page 69 of 186
Page 5 01'10
B. ENVIRONMENTAL
I. Site Description:
Proposed discharge of stonnwater in preserves
The applicant is proposing to discharge stonnwater runoff to the preserve. The
applicant indicates that the stonnwater system can be designed to prevent the first
inch of runoff ii-om entering the preserve. The applicant indIcates that runoff
VOh1111eS greater Lhan this first inch wlll discharge in1() the preserve fronl the
stonmvater system. ;'\nalysis provided by the applicant indicates that a I-day rainfall
of 2.i inches will produce I inch of runoff. Therefore, it will take a ! -day rainfall of
greater than 2. j Inches before the stormwater system discharges to the preserve.
Rainfalls less than this value will 110t result in stormwater system discharging to the
preserve.
COl1.\'ervlltlol1 and C'oastul il1anage!11ent Element Polit}' 6.1.1 (5j b. ()f the Gn)\\,th
Management Plan allows S1011TIVv'atcr in prcsen.rcs under the l(Jllov,iing condition:
Receipt oj' tr{:ulcc/ ';rornnvaicr discharge' vvhc!'c ,'Ilch II'.,'(!, including
c'oJll'eyancc, freatmeJU ({nd dischal~'{e ,I;true/ures, doc.'>' not result in adver5:{'
impacts 071 the natura/(v occurring, lwtivc vegetation, to include the loss' (~f
the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any hc."tcd specie.I,'
according to the policies associated with Ohject;ve 7.1, as determined by
criteria set forth in the land development regulations. Discharge to
preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality
stundards as set forth in Chapter, 62-302 F.A.C. and will conjiml1 to the
water quality criteria requirements set fiJrth by the South Florida Water
Management District.
The applicant asserts that the discharge of storn1water to the proposed preserves will
not result in adverse impacts to the native vegetation retained in the preserve. The
primary basis for this assertion is that untreated storm water runoff from the existing
development has been directly discharging to a preserve and that there is no evidence
of adverse impacts to this preserve. The existing preserve is characterized by cypress
and pine (western portion) and pine flalwoods (eastern portion) vegetation and is
underlain by hydric soils in its western side and non-hydric soils on its eastern side.
The applicant has also evaluated daily rainfall data for 1996 through 2007
(Attachment I) and is swnmarized in Table 0 I. Daily rainfalls greater than 2.1 inches
average more than 4 events per year for 1996-2006 with a low of 2 events for year
2004 and a high of 9 events for years 2001 and 2005. The applicant also modeled the
impact of a 25-year, 3-day rainfall event (11 inches) on the preserve and found that
the preserve would experience inundation for 10 days with a maximum depth of 1.9
feel.
5
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 70 of 186
Page 6 of 10
The proposed preserve is mostly underlain by non-hydric soils and can be
characterized as a mesic tlatwood. The hydrologic regime of mesic tlatwoods are
characterized as having a hydroperiod of a month or less (inundation) and a wet
season watcr depth of 2 inchcs or less I.
Somc aspects that staff is taking into consideration regards to directing stOllliwater
into the upland preserves are listed as follows:
The preserve areas at the northern portion of the property consist of upland
pine f1atwoods with a dense saw palmetto ground cover strata and are
cunently the driest area existing on site;
The type of soils in the preserve areas are characterized predominantly by
Boca Fina Sand (non-hydric) and to a lesser degree Pineda Fine Sand.
Limestone substratum I hydric).
'\ny ntnoff will I,m:" water to go to the north when historically stornlwater
has heen flov,/ing ;:l\vay from the preserve areas. ]t witI create a \\/etter
[()otprint to the habitat in the preserve areas:
The c\Jsting preserve I is located adjacent to an eXIsting canal which \vill help
the preserve to dry olT ljlllcker at the end of the rainy season;
the stol111\vater runoff analysis did not provide an assessment for thc period
the water will he stationary in the upland preserves. Since the preserve habitat
is chm'acter;zed as mesic ilatwood and according to Deuver's criteria from
Southwest F10lida Pre-development Conditions. this type of habitat can be
inundated for a length of 10 days during the rainy season in a maximum
depth, during a nOlmal wet season, of 2 ft below ground to 0.2 ft above
ground.
2. Wetlands
A total of 13 .63 acres of wetlands are proposed to be filled and 1.47 acres are
proposed to be excavated. The habitats which are proposed to be impacted include
hydric pine tlatwoods and cypress wetlands heavily infested with melaleuca, and an
area of hydric melaleuca monoculture,
3. Preservation Requirements
The proposed expansion includes impacts to on-site wetlands by the excavation of
1.4 7 acres of hydric pine tlatwoods heavily invaded by melaleuca, and the filling of
13.63 acres of hydric melaleuca, cypress wetlands, and hydric pine t1atwoods with
varying degrees of melaleuea infestation. Upland pine tlatwoods and melaleuca are
also proposed to be cleared on-site. A total of 0.8 acres of wetlands and a total of
4.93 acres of uplands will be preserved on-site.
I DUEVER.M. (2002). Southwest Fiorida Pre-development Vegetation Map.
6
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item ~Jo. 86
January 29,2008
Page 71 of 186
Page 7 of 10
This project meets the native vegetation preservation requirements. The project is a
commercial development of approximately 40 acres in size. Therefore. a minimum of
fifteen percent of the native vegetation is required to be retained (m-site. Of these 40~
acres of on-site native vegetation. 5.7 acrcs will be preserved.
In addition to the onsite preserve areas the applicant has purchased off-site land to be
used as mitigation credit fl'om the Belle Mead area to compensate lor any impacts to
potential red-cock ad cd woodpecker (RCW) habi',at (lI1-site, as previously approved
bv Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) on the existing
church sile.
4. Listed Species
" listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted on September 2002; June
2004; August 2005; and July 2006 by W Dexter Bender and ASSOCiates, ine In order
jo provide at least ~O(~/(J visual :.~(n.'erage, nvertapping bell transects sp(Jccd
approxin1atel'}l[ 00 ;f~,d Jrtan \VerL \.v~llkcd acruss the: !;~ntirc parcel _All potential
R C\V cavit.y pine trees \vere inspected a:; \ve];. The biologist un site ;ooked for signs
or listed species including tracks, scaL, nesting or roosting areas, The wading bird
SUr\,'e:Y \\'as conducted utilizing meandenng pcdestnan transects ~hrough all of the
onsite wetlands during eaeh survey event.
There were two abandoned RCW eavity trees observed, but they have been inactive
for cleven (I I) years. No signs of recent RCW activity were observed. To
compensate for impacts to potential RCW habitat, 30 acres of known RCW habitat in
the Belle Meade area will be enhanced and donated to the State of Florida. Please see
attachment A.4.g. v. for cOlTespondence from the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission indicating their
acceptance of the offsite habitat compensation plan.
A single white ihis (Eudocimus albus) was observed onsite. The proposed onsite
stom1water management lake, onsite preserved wetlands and the wetland pOliions of
the enhanced 30 acres in the Belle Meade area will compensate for any potential loss
of wading bird habitat. No other protected species were observed onsite.
VII. RECOMMENDATION
Stormwater Mana2ement:
I. This project must conform to the requirements and stipulations of the SFWMD
permit for the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project.
7
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. a6
January 29, 2008
Page 72 of 186
Page 8 of 1 0
Environmental:
Staff recommends denial of PUDZ-2003-AR- 360 I New Hope Ministries Phase II f,)r
the following reasons:
The applicant has not demonstrated that the addition oftreated stonnwater into the
upland preservcs on sitc will not result [n adverse impacts on the naturally occurring
native vegetation. This is not consistent with CCME Policy 6.1.] (5) h
8
EAC Meeting
Page 9 01'10
PREPARED BY:
DATE
STAN CHRZANOWSKI. P.E.
ENGINEERiNG REVIEW MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVJCES DEPARTMENT
CLAUDIA l'iOTROWiCZ DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
ENVIRONMENTAL SERViCES DEPARTMENT
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 73 of 186
MELISSA ZONE. DATE
PRINeIp AL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
9
EAC Meeting
Page ](1 of 10
REVIEWED BY:
BARBARA BURGESON
PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE
WILLlA.M D. LORENZ. Jr.. PE DAlE
ENVIRON~iENTAL SERVICES DFP^,RT'VIFNT DIRECIOR
Agenda Item I~o. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 74 of 186
JEFF WRIGHT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY
DATE
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATOR
10
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 75 of 186
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
for
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES
Section 4, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida
February 2004
Revised: July 2004
Revised: September 2005
Revised: March 2006
Revised: August 2006
Revised: March 2007
Prepared by
W. DEXTER BENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2052 Virginia Avenue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Section 10
Environmentallmpacl Statement
Page 1 of 11
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 76 of 186
Sec. 10.02.02.A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS (EIS)
1 0.02.02.AA.a Aoolicant Information
I. Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his/her education and job related environmental
experience.
See attached Company Overviews in Allachment A.4.a.i
ii. Owner(s)/agent(s) name, address. phone number and e.mail address.
W. Dexter Bender & Associates. Inc. 2052 Virginia Avenue. Fort Myers, FL 33901.
powen@dexbender.com
.Joff Davidson. Davidson Engineerinq. 2154 Trade Center Way, Suite 113, Naples, FL 34109,
jeff@davidsonengineoring.com
lO.02.02A4.b MaoOinq and Suonort Graphig;
i. General location map.
The project is located north of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84) Just east of the intersection of Davis
Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard. in Section 4. Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in
Collier County Florida. See the location map Included as Attachment AA.b.i
ii. Native habitats and their boundaries identified on an aerial photograph of the site extending at
least 200 feet outside the parcel boundary. This does not mean the applicant is requirod to go on
to adjoining properties. Habitat identification consistent with the Florida Department of
Transportation Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) shall be
depicted on an aerial photograph having a scale of one inch equal to at least 200 feet when
available from the County. Other scale aerials may be used where appropriate for the size of the
project, provided the photograph and overlays are legible at the scale provided. A legend for
each of the FLUCFCS categories found on-site shall be included on the aerial.
See the Vegetation/Aerial Overlay Map included as Attachment AA.b.ii
Iii. Topographic map, and existing drainage patterns if appiicable. Where possible, elevations within
each of FLUCFCS categories shall be provided.
See the Existing Conditions Plan included as Attachment AA.b.iii
iv. Soils map at scale consistent with that used for the Florida Department of Transportation Florida
land Use Cover and Forms Classification System determinations.
See the Soils Map included as Attachment A.4.b.iv
v. Proposed drainage plan indicating basic fiow patterns, outfall, and off-site drainage.
See the Water Management Plans included as Attachment AA.b.v
Socllon 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page2 of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 77 of 186
vi. Development plan including phasing program, service area of existing and proposed public
facilities, and existing and proposed transportation network in the Impact area.
See the Water Management Plans included as Atlachment AA.b.v
viI. Site plan showing preserves on-site, and how they align with preserves on adjoining and
neighboring properties. Include on the plan locations of proposed and existing development,
roads, and areas for stormwater retention, as shown on approved master plans for these sites, as
well as public owned conservation lands, conservation acquisition areas, major ftowways, and
potential wildlife corridors.
See the Water Management Plans included as Attachment A.4.b.v
viiI. For properties in the RLSA or RFMU Districts, a site plan showing the location ot the slle, and
land use designations and overlays as identified in the Growth Management Plan.
Not applicable. The property Is not located within the RLSA or RFMU Districts
1 O.02.02.A.4.c Proiect Description and GMP Consistencv Determination
i. Provide an overall description of the project with respect to environmental and water
management issues.
New Hope'Mlnistries is proposing to expand their existing facilities by developing the remaining
portion of the 20:t acros, and by developing the 20:t acre parcel adjacent to and west of the
existing site. The proposed facilities include a Main Sanctuary, a Family Centm, a multipurpose
. building, and a multi-use recreational sports field.
The proposed work area currently consists of undeveloped forested pine flatwoods, cypress
wetlands, and hydric pine flatwoods both with varying degrees of melaleuca infestation, The
proposed work area is bordered to the east by a residential development, to the north by Calusa
Park !;:Iemenlary, te the south by Davis Boulevard, and to the west by fallow crop land.
Proposed work extent includes Impacts fo on-site wetlands by the excavation of 1.47 acres of
hydric pine flatwoods heavily invaded by melaleuca, and the filling of 13.63 acres of hydric
melaieuca, cypress wetlands, and hydric pine ftatwoods with varying degrees of melaleuca
infestation. Upland pine ftatwoods and melaleuca are also proposed to be cieared on-site. A
total of 0.8 acres of wetlands and a total of 4.93 acres of uplands will be preserved on-site.
The applicant has purchased off-site land to be used as mitigation credll from the Belle Mead
area to compensate for any impacts to potential red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) habitat on-
site, as previously approved by Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) on
the existing church site.
Post development, the onslte drainage will be collected by a series of conveyance swales and
catch basins connected by underground piping. The storm water runoff will be treated for quality
and the volume attenuated on site by dry detention and a water management lake. Finally, the
storm water runoff will be discharged through a control structure into the FDOT right-of-way (for
Davis Blvd) where there is an existing drainage dltch_ Hydro periods in the remainIng onsite
preserve will attempt to mimic natural conditions.
I
I
1,.-
Section 1 a
EnvIronmental Impact Statement
Page 301 1t
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 78 of 186
ii. Explain how the project is consistent with each of the Objectives and Policies in the Conservation
and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, where applicable.
The project is consistent with the relevant objectives and policies in the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan, The project is consistent with
Objective 6.1 and the policies thereunder regarding protection of native vegetative communities
as the project is preserving 5.73:1: acres of uplands and wetlands on site, which amounts to 15.2:1:
percent of the applicable vegetation on the subject parcel. This exceeds the 15% requirement of
Policy 6.1.1 and the impacts to wetlands will be handled consistent with Policy 6.2.4,
The project is consistent with Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 of the CCME in that the wetlands have
been flagged and surveyed and a jurisdictional determination has been received from the
SFWMD. The project is consistent with Policy 6.2.6 of the CCME in that there are preserve areas
identified as such on the PUD Master Plan and the PUD requires the same to be subject to
conservation easements.
The project is consistent with the policies of the CCME regarding water quality in that the
stormwater management plan Is designed to meet all applicable water quality standards of the
State and will be subject to ERP permitting requirements of the SFWMD.
The project contains two inactive red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) cavity trees. The cavity trees
have been inactive for eleven years. The project is consistent with Policy 7,1.2 in that the cavity
trees have Deen deemed abandoned by both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. In addition, any potential impacts to
rod-cockaded woodpecker habitat have been compensated for through the purchase of 30 acres
of known RCW habitat within tho Belle Meade Forest.
10,02.02.A.4.d Native Veaetatlon Preservation
i. Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project
site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS).
Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on-site by vegetation type
(species), vegetalion composition (canopy, midstory, and ground cover) and vegetation
dominance (dominant, common, and occasional).
The predominant upland and wetland vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2002
digital color 1" = 100' scale aerial photography. Eight vegetation associations were identified
using the FLUCCS mapping nomenclature, The vegctaUon map attached as Exhibit AA.b.1I
depicts the approximate location and configuraUon of these vegetation associations. The
acreage Is summarized by FLUCCS code on Table 1, A brief description of each FLUCCS
association is provided below.
172
411M
411M4
*411HM
*411HM2
*411HM3
*411HM4
Religious Facility
Pine Flatwoods/Melaleuca invaded
Pine Flatwoods/Melaleuca Invaded sub-canopy (76-90%)
Pine Flatwoods-Hydric/Melaieuca Invaded
Pine Flatwoods-Hydric/Melaleuca invaded (26-50%)
Pine Flatwoods-Hydric/Melaleuca Invaded (51-75%)
Pine Flatwoods-Hydrlc/Melaieuca invaded (76-90%)
11.40
12.05
0.56
2.79
2,93
4.84
1.68
Section 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page 4 of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 79 of 186
*424H Melaleuca-Hydric 2,32
*621M Cypress/Melaleuca invaded 0,75
*624M Pine/Cypress/Melaleuca invaded 0.59
Upland Subtotal 24.01
Wetland Subtotal 15.90
TOTAL 39.91
. SFWMD Jurisdictional wetland
FLUCCS 411M - PINE FLATWOODS/MELALEUCA INVADED (12,05 acres)
This upiand is dominated with slash pine (Pinus oil/ollii var, densa), saw palmetto (Serenoa
repens), with 10% coverage of melaleuca (Meialeuca qu/nquenervia). Scattered Brazilian pepper
(Schinus tereblnthlfoiius), wax myrtle (Myrica car/feral, and poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
were also present.
FLUCCS 411 M4 - PINE FLATWOODSIMELALEUCA INVADED i76-90%) (0,56 acres)
This upland areas sub-canopy Is dominated by melaleuca with scattered poison Ivy, Slash pine is
present in the canopy.
FLUCCS 411 H iM-M4) - PINE FLA TWOODS-HYDRICIMELALEUCA INVADED i 12.24 acres)
These hydric pine flatwoods have various degrees of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervla)
infestation in the subcanopy, and Includo slash pine (Pinus ellio/til), scattered cypress (Taxod/um
dis/ichum), dahoon hoily (/lex cass/ne), swamp fern (Hlechnum serrulatum), various sedges and
Brazilian pepper,
FLUCCS 424H - MELALEUCAlHYDRIC (2.32 acres)
This wetland consists of melaleuca, with scattered slash pine, cypress and poison iVY.
FLUCCS 621M- CYPRESS/MELALEUCA INVADED (0.75 acresl
This wetland area Is dominated by cypress and buttonbush (Cephalanthus ocdden/alis) with 20%
Brazilian pepper coverage, The midstory and ground cover stratum Includes scattered dahoon
holly, saltbush (Baocharis halimifofia), climbing hemp-vine (M/kanla soandens), camphor weed
(PJuchea odora/a), melaleuca, beakrush (Rhynchospora spp,), and swamp fern.
FLUCCS 624M - PINE/CYPRESSIMELALEUCA INVADED (0,59 acresl
This wetland area is dominated by cypress, butlonbush, and slash pine with 20% Brazilian
pepper coverage. Ground and mldstory vegetation includes scattered dahoon holly,
saltbush, climbing hemp-vine, camphor weed, beakrush, melaleuca, and swamp fern,
II. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal
6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. and
Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land Development Code. Provide an exhibit illustrating such, include
calcuiatlons Identifying the acreage for preservation and Impact. per FLUCFCS category,
As discussed in response to Item 10.02.02A4.c,JJ above, the project meets the native vegetation
preservation requirement. The acreage of Impact and preserve vegetation Is summarized by
FLUCCS category in Tabie 2 beiow.
I
1-
Section 10
Eovlronmentallmpact Statement
Page 5 of t1
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 80 of 186
411M
411M4
'411HM
'411HM2
'411 HM3
'411HM4
'424H
'621M
'624M
Pine Flatwoods/Melaleuca invaded
Pine Flatwoods/Melaleuca invaded (26 -
50%)
Pine Flatwoods-HydriclMelaleuca Invaded
Pine Flatwoods-Hydric/Melaleuca invaded
(26-50%)
Pine Flatwoods-HydrlclMelalouca Invaded
(61 -75%)
_..._~-~-._----
Pi no Flatwoods-Hydric/Melaleuca invacled
(76-90%)
Melaleuca-Hydric
Cypress/Melaleuca invaded
Plne/Cypress/Melaleuca Invaded
Upiand Subtotal
Wetland Subtotal
TOTAL
SFWMD jurisdictlonal wetland
4.93 7.12
0.0 0.56
0.21 2.58
0.41 2.52
0.0 484
0.0 1.68
0.0 2.32
0.0 0.75
0.18 0.41
--~- --~-
4.93 7.68
-~
0.80 15.10
5.73 22.78
Iii. For sites already cleared and in agricultural use, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in
compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation In Policy 6.1.5 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land
Development Code. For sites cleared prior to January 2003, provide documentation that the
parcel(s) are In compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously Identified in the Growth
Management Plan and Land Development Code.
Not applicable
Iv. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site
during previous development order approvals? If so, identify the location and acreage of these
preserves, and provide an explanation if they are different from what is proposed.
Portions of the proposed impact areas (upland and wetland) are existing Collier County
Preserves which have not been maintained free of exotics. Portions of the preserve areas are
being relocated in order to accommodate placement of structure near the existing church
facilities. See the Preserve Management Plan included as exhibit A,4.d.iv.
v. For properties with Special Treatment "S1" overlays, show the ST overlay on the development
plan and provide an explanation as to why these areas are being impacted or preserved.
Not applicable. The property is not located within a Special Treatment 'S1" overlay.
10.02.02.A.4.e Wetlands
I. Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands (pursuant to Policy 6.2.1 and
6.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan)
according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Include
a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identiflod on-site by vegetation type (species),
vegetation composition (canopy, midstory, and ground cover) and vegetation dominance
Section 10
Envlronmentallmpact Stalement
Page6of11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 81 of 186
(dominant, common, and occasional). Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the
South Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection,
prior to submission to the County,
The limits of the SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters have been flagged in
the field, reviewed and approved by SFWMD and survey located. Please see the vegetation map
attached as Ao4,bJi. for the locations of these features. A description of the vegetation within
each wetland FLUCCS category is provided in the response to item 10,02,Q2,Ao4,dJ above.
Ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological
Indicators. Indicate how the project design improves/affects predevelopment hydroperiods.
Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevation(s) for the site,
The existing control elevation, which coincides with the wet season water table elevation (in this
case) was established during permitting of the original project. We are modifying the existing
permit and see no reason to not agree with the existing control previously so\. No adventitious
rooting, consistent lichen lines, or clear stain lines were observed within the onsite wetlands, This
may be indicative of a seasonal high water lovel that Is presently at or below grou nd elevation.
The wet season water table is 9.5' and the estimated average dry season water table is 6.0',
Current drainage is generally to the south into the Davis Blvd drainage ditch, Post development,
the onsite drainage will be oollected by a series of conveyance swales and catch basins
connected by underground piping. The storm water runoff will be treated for quality and the
volume attenuated on site by dry detenllon and a water management lake, Finally, the storm
water runoff wili be discharged through a control structure into the FOOT right-of-way (for Davis
Blvd) where ther') is an existing drainage ditch. Hydro periods in the remaining onsite preserve
will attempt to mimic natural condlllons.
iii. Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed
impacts on the functions of these wetlands, Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands
to be impacted and those to be preserved on-site. Describe how impacts to wetiands have been
minimized.
A totai of 13,63 acres of wetlands are proposed to be filled and 1047 acres are proposed to be
excavated, The habitats which are proposed to be impacted Include hydric pine fiatwoods and
cypress wetlands heavily infested with melaleuca, and an area of hydric melaleuca monoculture,
Parts of these areas are existing Collier County Preserves that have not been maintained free of
exotic species. See Impact Map included as attachment AA.e.11I
Based on past experience, New Hope has determined that new construction must be based on
needs, and projected at least fifteen years into the future to adequately provide for future growth.
This projection should incorporate a new and larger capacity sanctuary, a general muiti-purpose
building for wedding receptions, special meetings, fellowship dinners for the various groups,
additional storage, and overflow classrooms. A soparate building would also be needed to
provide a gymnasium for basketball and Informal meetings, in addition to rooms equipped for
physical exercise programs and other training activities.
New Hope has also been working with various county agencies and has offered these facilities for
use as an emergency shelter and voting precinct. The facilities are used as a center for local
blood bank programs, the National Conference of the Early Childhood Development Association,
and the American Christian Schools International.
i
I,
New Hope serves as a meeting place for local community, country club, and condominium
associations, Other organizations and groups that utilize the facility Include The Assembly of God
Planning Committee, the Collier County Sheriffs Department K-9trainlng division, FEMA, and the
Section 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page 7 of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 82 of 186
Collier County Emergency Management System, The Collier County Home Schooling Group
uses the main sanctuary for all their graduation programs and activilies.
The property also serves as a turning and re-direction poinl for the Collier County School Bus
System and other transportation authorities, Alternate parking is also provided for the Naples
Boys and Girls Club.
The New Hope facilities will also serve as a food and water distribution center during
emergencies and will provide parking for Collier, Dado, and Broward counties during emergency
evacuations to alleviate traffic congestion at SR 951 and 1-75. New Hope has aiso made
provisions for additional power and shelter during these emergencies.
New Hope has maintained a school of ministries open to the public for several years, graduating
in excess of three hundred and thirty students, Expanding on this need, New Hope Is planning to
construct a building to be used for educational programs, This wouid include the construction of
a baseball and soccer fieid to be used by New Hope members, youths, students, and local
communities,
The wetlands present on site are severely degraded due to extensive melaleuca infestation and
hydrologic alterations. Almost all of the site's wetlands are dominated by melaleuca. The sites
hydrology has been severely altered by the construction of Davis Boulevard, the apartment
complexes to the north and east, and the filled agricultural field to the west of the site, The site
has become completely isolated hydrologically and is surrounded by intense development.
Therefore based on the land needs of New Hope Ministries, the community benefits of this
construction, and the poor condition of the on site wetlands, the purchase and donation of off site
mitigation is the best alternative, This method will allow for adequate space for development at
New Hope and compensate for the on site impacts to wetlands. Offsite mitigation will not
substitute for Collier County preserve requirements. Please see the atlacl1cd Wetland Mitigation
and Monitoring Plan (Attachment A4,e.iv.).
iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland Impacts pursuant to the Policies and
Objectives In Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth
Management Plan. For sites In the RFMU District, provide an assessment, based on the South
Florida Water Management District's Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method, that has been
accepted by either the South Florida Water Management District or the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection. For sites outside the RFMU District, and where higher quality wetlands
are being retained on-site, provide Justification based on the Uniform Mitigation Assessment
Methodology.
The site plan and wetland mitigation plan (Attachment AA.e.iv) have been designed to minimize
wetland Impact to the extent practicable, A SFWMD permit has already been obtained for this
project The project Is not located In an RFMU district and no higher quality wetlands are being
preserved onslte.
10.02.02A4.f Surface and Ground Water Manaoement
I. Provide an overall description of the proposed water management system explaining how It
works, the basis of design, historical drainage flows, off-site flows coming in to the system and
how they will be Incorporated In the system or passed around the system, positive outfall
availability, Wet Season Water Table and Dry Season Water Table, and how they were
determined, and any other pertinent information pertaining to the control of storm and ground
water.
Please see the response to item 10,02.02A4,e.l1 and the attached Water Management Plans
(Attachment AA,b,v).
Section 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page B of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 83 of 186
,-
ii. Provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality
loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed iand
uses and stormwater management controis) compared with water quality loadings of the project
area as It exists in its pre-development conditions. This analysis is required for projects impacting
five (5) or more acres of wetlands. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies
approved by Federal and State water quality agencies.
Water quality is not expected to be degraded as a resuit of this project Best management
practices will be utilized in the application of chemicals necessary for lawn and common areas.
The proposed project Is not expected to. generate water pellutlon, and activities related to the
eperation of the common areas and facilities will be in compliance with applicable state
standards. The project will incorporate standard South florida Water Managemont District water
quality control features to retreat storm water runoff. Preserves will be protected from siltation
through the use of staked filter cloth and hay bales placed along the preserve/upland interface
during construction. Please see the water quality loading analysis attached as exhibit
10.02.02A4.f.Ii,
iii. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overiay Zenes (WRM-ST) within the
project area and provide an analysis of how the project design avoids tho most intensive land
uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs. Describe the measures that are proposed to mitigate
for impact to stato and foderally ilsted species.
The proposed development is not located within a WRM-ST.
Please see the responses to Items 1 0.02.02A4.g.i - v beiow for a discussion of listed species
occurring on the property.
10.02.02.A.4.a Listed Species
I. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species known to
inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on-site, and conducted in accordance with
the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. State actual survey time and dates, and provide a map showing the location(s)
of species of special status identified on-site.
A Protected Species Assessment Is submitlod as Attachment A.4,g.i
II. identify all listed species that are known to Inhabit biological communities similar to those existing
on the site or that have been directly observed on the site.
The table below summarizes the listed species that could potentially occur on-site given the
general habitat types present. No species listed by either the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission were observed on the subject
parcel.
Section 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page 9 of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 84 of 186
~ 'liiB"""~"""'1t~,'
Gopher Frog (Rana areolata)
Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corals couper0
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)
Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Plco/des borealis)
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus nigor avlcennla)
Florida Black Bear (Ursus amer/canus floridanus)
Florida Panther (Felis conca/or carYl)
Southeastern American kestrel (Falco sparverlus paulus)
Fakahatchee burmannia (Burmannia flava)
Satin leaf (Cl1yrsopl1yllum a/iv/forme)
Boautiful pawpaw (Deeringolhamnus pufcIJellus)
Florida coon tie (Zamla floridana)
424H
none
621M
American alligator (Ailigator mississippiensis)
I Limpkin (Aramus guarauna)
Wood stork (Mycter/a amer/cana)
I L.ittle blue heron (Egrella caeru/a)
I Snowy egret (Egrella thula)
Tricolored heron (Egretla tricolor)
Florida black bear (Ursus americanus flor/danus)
Florida panther (Felis concolor carYl)
624M
Florida black bear (Ursus amar/canus floridanus)
Little blue heron (Egrella caeru/a)
Snowy egret (Egret/a thula)
Tricolored heron (Egretla tr/color)
Florida panther (Felis conca/or cory0
I
-~
III. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. Describe the
measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species.
There were two abandoned RCW cavity trees observed, but thoy have been inactive for eleven
(11) years. No signs of recent RCW activity were observcd. To compensate for impacts to
potential RCW habitat, 30 acres of known RCW habitat In the Belle Meade area will be enhanced
and donated to the State of Florida. Please see attachment A.4.g.v. for correspondence from the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Fiorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission indicating their acceptance of the offsite habitat compensation plan.
A single white ibis (Eudocimus a/bus) was observed OIlslie. The proposed onsite stormwater
management lake, onslte preserved wetlands and the wetland portions of the enhanced 30 acres
in the Belle Meade area will compensate for any potentiai loss of wading bird habitat. No other
protected species were observed onsite.
iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species known to occur on the property.
For siies with bald eagle nests and/or nest protection zones, baid eagle management plans are
required, copies of which shall be Included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where
applicable.
Not applicable
SecUon 10
Environmental Impact Statement
Page to of 11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 85 of 186
v. Where applicable, include correspondence received from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), with
regards to the project. Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met.
Please see Attachment AA.g.v which ihcludes correspondence from FFWCC and USFWS
indicating acceptance of the offsite habitat compensation plan,
10.02.02A4.h Other
i. For multi-slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina faciiities, show how the
project is consistent with the Marina Siting and other criteria in the Manatee Protection Plan.
Not applicable. The proposed project does not contain docking or marina facilities.
ii. Include the results of any environmental assossments and/or audits of the property. If applicable.
provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site.
No environmental assessments have been conducted on the subject parcel.
iii. For sites iocated in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern-Special Treatment (ACSC..ST)
ovorlay district, show how the project Is consistent with the development standards and
regulations established for the ACSC-ST.
Not applicable. The property is not located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical Slate Concern-
Special Treatment overlay district.
iv, Soil sampling and ground water monitoring reports and programs shall be required for sites that
occupy old farm fields, old golf courses or are suspected of previously having contamination on
site. The amount of sampling and testing sllail be determined by the Environmental Servlcos
staff along with the Pollution Control Department and the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection.
Not applicable. The property does not occupy old farm fields, old golf courses, or is suspected of
previously having contamination on site.
v. Provide documentation from lhe Florida Master Site File, Florida Department of State and any
printod historic archaeologicai surveys that have been conductod on the project area. Locate any
known historic or archaeological sites and their relationships to the proposed project design.
Demonstrate how the project design preserves the historic/archaeological Integrity of the site.
Please find attached a letter (Attachment AA.h.v) from the Florida Department of State dated July
6, 2004 stating "no cultural resources will be affected by this undertaking.'
W:\NHM_3\NeWl;ope.EIS.03.07.(newfarmal).doc
Section 10
Envlronmentallmpact Statement
Page 11 ol1t
Agenda Ilem No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 86 of 186
Attachment A.4.a.i
Company Overviews
!
.,
I
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 87 of 186
w. O.xt., 8'Hd" g,
Assoelat.s, 'J He"
eOMPANY OvenV3eW
I
.-
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 88 of 186
OVERVIEW
:.....:
-',<,!".,
W. Dexter Bender &. Associates, Inc., Environmental Consulting, Marine
Engineering and Pennitting Specialists, offers a team of professionals to
assist the cUent in planning, designing, and permitting variouscoastaI
resource and land development related projects. .our staffhas more than 95
years of combined experience regarding environmental. land use, coastal, and
regulatory consulting work.
'"""-..l'
PEJUltI'ITING - APPLICATION PACKAGES roR:
.
Dredge and Pill Pemtits
Variance Requests
AdmInistrative Hearings
. Nationwide, General and Individual Penuits
Letters of Permission
Coastal Constmctlon J'emlits
Sovereign Land Use Authorizations
Submerged Land l&aseslEasements
Conservation Easements
Developments of Reglonallmpact
Binding Letters of Interpretation
."'lr'
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL, MARINA, 8( COASTAL DESIGN
. Bathymetric and nydrogmphic Smveys
. Conunerclal Marinas, Private Docks
. . Water Quality Analysis/lmprovements
- Uydmullc Modellng of Marinas
. . Shoreline Stabilhatlon Structures .
ENVIRONMENTAL Al"lALYSIS &. LAND USE PLANNING
. EnviromnentaIAssessmentsJEnvlronmental Impact Statement
. RestoraUoD/Creatlon of Wetlands 8( Wildllre I1abitats
· EnVIronmental Resources Inventories
-Wetland,tSubmerged Land Analysis and Utilization studies
. Pcolec\:ed Species Assessments (PSA)
. Development Suitability Reports (DSR)
. Land Use Analysis and Resource Management Plans
. Recreation and Resource Planning
. Value Engineering
I
, .
1.-
I
I
I
k-'"-
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 89 of 186
, :
........-~.
,
'. STAFF RESUMES
.'"
h
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
'.January 29,2008
Page gOof 186
v. ALLEN I10FFACIillR
PRESIDENT
Current Responsibilities:
Manages ovemll operations of company and all field enviromnental staff.
Responsible for all reports and data Interpretation related to Jurisdictional
detemlinations, protected' species assessments, upland dredge and nll
permitting, development suitability reports and wildlife inventories. Primary
advisor on impacts to faumil species, prlmarilymanatees, as it relates to
coasml projects. Mediator between private owners and reguiatory agencies
regarding state rule infraction. and enforcement cases."
Experience:
Allen has been with the tlnnslnce July :1980 with three years prior experience
as an Interpretive ranger With the Florida Park 5errlce. Respousiblefor the
. design of an Eco-Management Plan for a 20,000 acre State Preserve. Expert
in environmental design, permItting;. and enforcement issues through local,
state and federal enviromnental agencies. Qualified as an expett witness wi~h
Department of Environmental Prot<<tion regarding water quality and dredge
. and flllleglslatlon. Qualltled as an expert witness by the Audubon Society
regarding woodstorks \'S. transmIssion towers. and general Ornithology.
Specific knowledge and~rtlSe in the resolution of controversial Red-
Cot:kaded Woodpecker (RCW) and Scrub Jay Issues In Florida. Worked with
RCW Federal Recovery Coordinating Team In South Florida mapping RCW
colonIes and appllcatJon to Forestry and Development Tcclmlqties. Spetltlc
expertise involves environmental, economlcs,jurlsdlctlonal detennlnaUons,
and land analysis, Endangered Species Studies, development, resolution of
case violations and consent 'orders with the regulatoI)' agencies. Co-Author
of the award winiIlng Lee County Manatee and Boater Safety Plan approved
by the Governor and Cabinet, 1989. Caloosahatchee River seagrass study.
I
Education:
B.s, - Mlljon Health and Education, Minor: Biology, Mercer UnIversity, 1976
Affiliations:
City of Fort Myers Planning Board :1991-1998, :1989 Past State President
. Florida Conservation Association, Big Brother/BIg Sisters, Everglades
J.>rotectlon AssociaUon, Florida Keys Guides Association, S.W. Flortda
. AudubOn Society Conservation Award, International Game Fish Association,
Federation of FJyFlsherman, Gulf Coast Conservation A$soclation Past Board
. Member, Fiorida' Association of Bnviwnmental Professionals, Ducks
Unlimited, ConununIty Redevelopment Agency BOard Member - Lee Jxmnty
Commission 1993-199/1-, Florida Bay Initiative BOard'1993-1997, Executive
"
l-
I
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 91 of 186
Oversight Commitme Board Member Lee County Commission. 1995-1.994"
1994 Fort Myers Rotarian. .
!
I
I
I
THOMAS II. FRASER, PII;D.
SENIOR SCIENTIST
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 92 of 186
Current Responsibilities Include:
Designing, coordinating the collection of samples, review, and analysis of
water quaUI;y and quantity data related to freshwater, estuarine and marine
habitats; statistical analysis of physical and biological data; development of
sampliItg designs for spC()lfic projects to fulfiUagency requests; water quality,
manatee and other biological issues for existing or proposed marinas;
computer programming in SAS for modeling long tenn database Infomtatlon
for cumulative Impact analysIS; negotiation of consent orders, noUce of
violations, and cease and desist orders; expert witness in FAC 120 hearings.
Experience:
Nine years as Senior Sclentist at WDBA. cleven years as director of an
environmental laboratory; six years as a marine biologist for the analysis of
data and reports, design and implementation of biological and water quality
projects. SupelYisCd. projects designed to monitor water qualil;y and
. biological effects of coastal development on marine and estuarine waters.
Developed baseliIte aquatic data for Charlotte flarbor, Peace River, Indian
River Lagoon, and S1. Lucie estuary. Uatson between clients and Florida
. State regulatory agencIes, u.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Bnvironmental
Protection Agency,and ~ous regional planning councils. Consent Order
negotiations with agencies. Qualified for expert witness testlmony In Chapter
120 hearings and legislative acUvil;y regarding development of Florida rules .
related to water quality, rlSherieS, marine biology, manatees, and regulatory
. agency permitting. Both Governors Graham and Martinez appointed Dr.
Fraser to serVe on the Florida Marine Fisheries CommissIon and he was
Chairman for 4 years of 8 on the Commission. Chalnnan, Tecbnlcal Advisory
Committee for theCbarlotte Ifarbor National Estuary program. Scientific peer
review panel for the Peace River Water Authority. Extensive background In
research, teachlng and report preparation, with 42 peer reviewed publications
and author of numerous reports..
, Bducation:
Smithsonian Fellow, National Museum of Natural Uistory, Washington n.e.1
Post--Doctoral fellowship -1974
. Ph.D. in Marine Biology - University of Miami - 1970
M.S. - Ma.rine Biology - University of Miami, 1966
B.S. - Zoology (minor Chem1stry)- Florida State UniversitY, 1963
Mfillations:
\
L
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 93 of 186
American Association for the Advancement of Science; Atilerlcan SOCiety of
Ichthyologists and fIerpetologists; Biological Society. of Washington;
Estuarine R.esearch Federation; Sigma XI
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 94 of 186
TYLER. C. KING
PRINCIYAL BIOLOGIST
Current Responsibilities:
Responsibilities include project management, analysis of wildlife and
vegetative habitat, preservation and/or relocation relative to property
development, field analysis and preparation of reports regarding agency
Jurisdiction In wetlands, protected species assessments, development
suitability reports, and dredge and fiU permitting. PerfomlS compliance
inspections and mitigation monItoring. Primarycoordlnatorwith Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Experience:
Joined rum in April 1988. Prior experience witil the Florida Department of
. .
Environmental Regulation, Pemlittlng Compliance and Enforcement
SpedalJst. Knowledge of pennlttingand enforcement pollcles of federal,
state, and local environmental regulatory agencieS. Qualified as an expert
. witness with the Department of Environmental Regulation regarding dredge
and fill legislation. Experienced In wetland creation/mitigation{ restoration.
Expert In Florida vegetation and. wildlife identification. Authorized by Florida
.. Fish and Wildlife Conservation CommissIon for gopher tortoise relO<:ations.
Education:
B.s. - Blology/ZOology, Northeast Louisiana UniversIty, 1981
. Affiliations:
National Association of Environmental Professionals, Coastal Conservation
Association, Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Quail
Unlimited, Ducks UnlimIted, Real Estate Investment Society, Florida Trail
. .
Riders Association, American Motorcycle Association
I
!
I
I
L
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 95 of 186
PAUL K. OWEN
SENIOR ECOLOGIST
Current Responsibilities:
Specific responsibilities include project management, aU aspects of
environmental permittlng, environmental studies, preparation of mitigation,
maintenance, and monitoring plans and penult compliance, Procures
environmental penuits (local - city and county, state - WMD, PDEP, PFWCC,
and fedeml- USACOE, USEPA-I'IPDES, USSWF), conducts mitigation analysis,
. design, constructlon plans, contract management, conservation easements,
inspection, and monitorlrtg; obtains official jurisdictional determinations
from the USACOE, WMD, and FDEP; conducts Protected Species and
Submerged Land SUIVeys; prepares Due Diligence reports and maps alld
Obtains Protected Species take and relocation penults; prepares proposals
and bids.
Experience:
OVer ten years of working in Florida's upland and wetland environments
including eight years as project manager in environmental pemtltting in
central and South Florida, Prior experience with engineering and
en1lironmental consulting finns In Southwest Florida. Supervised v.uiOllS
water quality and biological monitoring programs in marihe and estuarine
waters. Experienced. with ecosystem ~d water budget computer modeling.
Specific knowledge and experience with American Aliigator Regulations as
well as Gopher Tortoise, Indigo Snake, Scrub Jay and protected plant Issues
and management. Expert in mltigatlondeslgti and compllance as well as
Florida's flom and fauna.
Education:
MoS. - Systel11S Ecology, UnivcISity of Florida, 1993
. BS, - Wildlife Ecology/Forestly/ZOology, UnIversIty of Florida, 1991
Mfiliatlons:
ProfessIonal Wetland sctentist #1102, SocIety of wetland ScIentists;
ProfessIonal Mangrove Trimmer, state of Florida; certified Wildlife Biologist,
The Wildlife SocIety;
Wetlands certificate, University of Florida's Center for Wetlands and Water
Il.esources;
Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Active Member.
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 96 of 186
PARKE D. LEWIS
BIOLOGIST
Experience:
Twelve years experience in environmental consulting in southwest Florida
specIalh;ing in the detennination of agency jurisdictional wetlands, protected
specIes assessments and related pennittlng. Responsibilities Include project
management, llnalysls of wildlife and vegetative habitat, compliance
. lnspec,tions, and monitoring. .
Also experienced in the design andimpiementation ofwetlandntlUgatlonand
presenatlon projects and wildlife habitat use analysis;
other areas of specialization lnclude extensIve U$ted specIes relocation and
habitat managenientprojects, the tracking and monitoring of U$ted species
and the Identification of Florida wildlife and vegetation. Authorlied by the
FlorIda Fish and Wildlife Consenatlon Commission for gopher tortoise
relocation. Experienced in the pennitting and enforcement policies of
Fedeml, State, and local agencies.
Education:
. B.s. - Biology, 11ft. st. Mary's College, 1988
Aff'dlations:
FloridaAssoclation of Environmental Professionals, Ducks Unlimited, Coastal
ConsenatlonAssoc1ation. Lee COunty Land StewardsWp l"cogram volunteer.
Professional Mangroye TrImmer, state of Florida (MTQtffl04) .
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 97 of 186
IAl'i M. VINCENT
ECOLOGIST
I
Current Responsibilities:
Performs wetlands jurisdictional det(frminations and protected spedes
assessments associated witb land development penuitting. ResponSible for
design and preparation of mitigation plans, monitoring plans, wildlife
management plans, plantlngplans, exotic removal plans and vegetation
removal plans. Assembly and tracking Q[ wetland penuit applications for
local, state and federal agencies. Field data 'collection including mitigation
monitodng., water quality monitoring., submerged resource surveys, well and
staff gauge readlngs, seasonal bigb water detennlnations and compllan~
monitoring. Report propamtlon including development suitability reports,
protected s~ies assessments, wildlife management plans, mitigation plans
and various analyses relatlng to tbe pemtlttirtg process.
Experience:
. . Experience resolving environmental concems arising [rom development
througII thepennlttlng pr~ In Florida's upland and wetland environments
since 1991.' Prior ~rience as project manager witb. environmental
consultlnS flrms in Southwest Florida. Supervised wrlous water quality and
. biological monitoring programs in marine and estuarlnewaters. Experienced
witb babitat and land use mapping. Area of expertise is resolution of issues .
relative to wetland and wlldUCe pennltting. Possesses knowledge and
experience with weUand pemtlttlng and wildlife issues including management
plans and/or app.ropriate permits relating to Bald Eagle, Gopl1erTortolse,
Eastern Indigo Snake, Florida Scmb Jay, Red-Cockaded Woodpecker and
protected plants.
Education:
58. - Natural Resource Conservation and Management
. University of Kentucky, 1995
Affiliations:
Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, International Snook
Federation, Coastal Conservation Association
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 98 of 186
CRAIG M. SMITIl
ECOLOGIST
Current Responsibilities
Mr. Smith provides an array of environmental studies and selYices related
to land development and property evaluation in south florida. These
activities, performed for private landowners and public entitles, include
vegetation mapping, binding and informal state and federal wetland
jurisdictional determinations, habitat evaluations, threatened and
endangered species sUlYeys, and wetland (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Water Management
District) permit applications. Additional services include threatened and
endangered species relocation and management plans, wetland mitigation
(creation, restoration, enhancement, and preservation) plans, and design
and implementation of wetland monitoring plans.
Experience
. Mr. Smith joined thefirm in 2003 bringing over sixteen years of experience
as a environmental consultant in South Florida. More than 240,000:!:
acres of land has been mapped and evaluated during this period.
Individual properties ranged In size from less than five acres to more than
one thousand acres. Projects have included agricultural, residential,
commercial, and industrial land uses, new and expanding roadways, and
wetland restoration (wetland mitigation banking). Wetland permitting
experience includes preparation of state and federal permit applications
and supporting documents, responding to agency questions and third
. party concems, and negotiating mutually acceptable wetland mitigation
plans. SUlYeys and management plans have been conducted and prepared
for gopher tortoises, eastel'll indigo snake, bald eagle, red-cockaded
woodpecker, and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Authorized by the florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission to relocate gopher tortoises.
Education and Certification
Master of Science, University of NOlth Carolina at Wilmington, 1987
Bachelor of Science, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 1984
Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America
Professional Wetland Sclentlst (No. 2(8), Society of Wetland Scientists
Certified Wetland Delineator, U.S. Army ColpS of Engineers
Mfiliatious
Ecological Society of America
SOciety of Wetland Scientists
'1
1
I
,
!
I
!
,
t'
I
I.
I
!
I~
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 99 of 186
DANE C. SMITII
COMPUfER SYSTEMS MANAGER
Current KesponsibUities:
Maintain computers and network witWn the company. Install and update
software on all machines. Perform hardware upgmdes. Write programs
ne<<ssa1j' for company. Principal AutoCAD Technician perfonning
cllgineeIing design and graphics. Also involved in field surreying.
Experience:
Over twent.y-slx years experience in engineering related fields. Twelve years as
project manager or department head. nas background in four software
languages. Joined tile non In 1.991.. Prior experience with a consulting
. engineering non designing. permitting and overseeing constmc~ion of
wastewater treatment systems.
Education:
. Engineering. Ball State Unlverslty, 1968
Affiliations:
Vice (>resident of Lee cOunty AutoCAD User's Group, Member of Board of
Directors of llomcoWners' Assoclation .
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 100 of 186
I
Attachment A.4.b.i
Location Map
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Location Map
----~ .
~
/~
/
~...- ,/,./
/---
.../'
/'
I
!
,
,
]
COLLIER COUNTY
!
i
I
I
I
I
.'
'-
~~
-"
~-
il
---.~
---.
PINE RIDGE OAD (C.R. 89
'"
<(
o
'"
<>:
'"
<>:
OJ
~
OJ
<{
l--
Z
<{
Vl
;n
01
nO
d
~
;n
co
nO
<3
~
GOLDEN
GATE
. Project
Location
~ GOLDEN
'"
"-
I
1=
TE PARKWAY (c.
I
]
RADID ROAD C.R. 856
DAVIS BOULEVARD (s.R. 84)
o
'"
z
'"
<{
en
>-
l--
Z
::>
o
;n
0>
nO
U
RA TTLESNAKE KAMMOCK RD.
PERJflr use ONLY;
Nor FOR CONsrRUCrlON
June 01, 2001 ;3:07:06 p.m.
Orowln9: NHM3PROJ::CTJ-OCA.TlOO.DWC (DeS)
w: DEXTER BENDER
AND ASSOCIATES
ENWRONJlE.wrAJ:, J: Jt'ARfNE CONSOJ:,rfNC
FORr HYERS. FE., (!Nt) :J,J.(-8680 REVISED:
New Hope
Ministries
I
I
Attachment AA.b.ii
Vegetationl Aerial Overlay Map
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 102 of 186
I
I
I
I
L
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 103 of 186
WETLAND MITIGATION AND
MONITORING PLAN
fo,'
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES
September 2002
Revised: January 2003
Revised: April 2003
Revised: August 2004
Revised: March 2006
}'rcpa,'cd by:
W. DEXTER BENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2052 Virginia Avenue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Agenda item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 104 of 186
New Hope Ministries
Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
INTRODUCTION
'nle site ofthe 39* acre proposed N cw Hopc MinislIies facilities currcntly is composed of 11.4 acrcs
of existing religious facilities, roughly 12 acres of pine tlatwood uplands with melaleuca infestation
(FLUCCS 41 1M), 2.3 acrcs ofmelalellca wetlands (FLUCCS 424H), 12.2 acres of pine flatwoocl
wetlands with valying degrees of melaleuca infestation (FLUCCS 411 H(M-M4)), 0.8 acres of
Cypress wetlands with melakllca (FUJCCS 621M), 0.6 acres of melalcllca uplands (FUJCCS
41IM4), and 0,6 acres ofPinc and CyP. rcss wctlands with melalcllca illfestation (FUJCCS (i24M).
. .
The wetland impacts proposed for this project consist of impacting 14.22 acres ofmelalcuca infested
wetl and s.
PROPOSED MTflGATlON
To improve and maintain the quality of vegetative communities ior wildlife utilization by listed and
11nlisted species and water quality improvenwnt, the following management practices are proposed:
Enhance ancl donate two parcels of land in the Belle Meadc area and the Picayune State Forest
totaling 30* aercs. This area is known to be potential Rcd Cockaded Woodpecker and Florida
Panthcr habitat. Enhancement will include removal of all exotic vegetation from uplands and
wctlands and replanting areas dcvoid of nativc vcgetation. Both parccls will be donated to thc State
of Florida.
PARCEL 1
This 20 acre parcel is located 1,320' south of Saba I Palm Road in Section 27, Township 50S, Range
27E. Please find attachcd a vcgctativc map ofthe parcel. The following is a brief description ofthe
three (3) vegetative communities observed onsitc:
FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION AREA (AC)
41lM Pine flatwoods/Melaleuca invaded 2.6
411 HM 1 Pinc flatwoods-hydric/Melaleuca invaded (10-25%) 6,1
411HM3 Pinc flatwoods-hydric/Meialeuca invaded (51-75%) 11.3
PARCEL 2
This 10 acre parcel is located south and adjacent to Sabal Palm Road in Section 26, Township 50S,
Range 27E. Please find attachcd a vegetation map of the parcel. The following is a btief desctiption
of the three (3) vcgetative communities observed onsite:
I
l_
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 105 of 186
New Hope Ministries
Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION AREA (AC)
41lM Pine flatwoodslMelaleuca illVaded 1.5
411HM Pinc flatwoods-hydric/Mela1cuca invaded 1.8
411 HM3 Pine flatwoods - hydriclMclaleuca invaded (51-75%) 6,7
EXOTIC PLANT CONTROL
The off site wetland enhanccment and upland prescrvation mitigation areas will be eradicated of
cxotic spccies and will be maintain cd in perpetuity to ensure that thcse arcas remain free of exotic
vegetation (Brazilian peppcr, IIlclaleuca, Australian pine, climbing fern, primrose willow, wild taro,
etc,) and that nuisance species constitute no more than 5% ofthe total vcgetative coveragc. initial
treatment of areas interspersed with native vegetation will include selective trcatment utilizing
chainsaws or machetes and treatment with a stump specified herbicide suitable for aquatic
application. The wetlands will be maintained free of exotic species by means ofthe following best
management practices:
1, No heavy equipment will be used wi thin prescrve areas,
2. Stem removal and treatment with an appropriate herbicide.
3. Deadening in place by treatment of stems with an appropriate herbicide.
Quarterly maintenance events targeting removal ofundesirablc vegetation will be conducted in all
mitigation arcas to ensure success criteria are met. The applicant shall be responsible for
maintenance at the two (2) offsite mitigation parcels for 5 ycars following penuit issuance.
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING
Offsite Mitigation Parcell contains 11.3 acres of hydric pine flatwoods with 51-75% infestation by
melaleuca (FLUCCS 4IlHM3), This area shall be planted with 3 gallon sized slash pines (Pinus
elliot/i) and dalloon holly (Ilex cassine) trees on 20' centers (1 ,230 trees total). Additionally, 1 gallon
sized herbaceous plants and shrubs including wiregrass (Aristida spp.), gulf muhly grllSs
(Muhlenbergia capillaris), broomsedge (Andropogonsp.), gallberry (flex glabra), and saw palmetto
(Serenoa repens) will be planted on 10' centers (4,922 plants total) in this area, Please see the
attached Parcell Mitigation Map.
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 106 of 186
New Hope Ministries
Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
Offsite Mitigation Parcel 2 contains 6.7 acres of hydric pine flatwoods with 51-75% infestation by
melaleuca (411HM3), This area shall be planted with 3 gallon slash pine and dahoon holly trees on
20' centers (730 trees total). Additionally, I gallon sized herbaceous plants and shrubs including
wire grass. brooms edge, gulf muhly grass, gallberry, and saw palmetto will be planted on 1 0' centers
(2,919 plants total). Please see the attachcd Parcel 2 Mitigation Map.
I
,
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
A Conservation Easement will be recorded and placed ovcr the two (2) offsite mitigation areas and
granted to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
LONG TERM MANAGItMENT
Thetwo (2) offsite mitigation parcels shall bemaintaincd and monitored by the applicant for a period
of five (5) years following permit issuance. The two (2) offsite parcels shall then bedonatcd to the
State of Florida, which will be responsible for long term maintenance and management upon
demonstration ofless than 5% exotic vegetation and 50% coverage of native desirable species.
MONITORING
Vegetation Monitoring Methodology
The offsite mi tigation parcels shall include two (2) transects each that run the length of each property
for quantitative monitoring. The approximate percent coverage by vegetative species will be noted
and reported in annual monitoring reports.
Photo Points
Permanent panorama photographic stations will be established in offsite mitigation parcels at the
beginning of the transects. These photographs will be included in annual monitoring reports. Please
refer to the attached mitigation maps for proposed photo point locations.
Wildlife Observations
Any evidence of wildlife utilization (direct observations, tracks, scat, etc.) within these areas will
be noted during monitoring events and included in allliual monitoting reports.
,-
I
I
L
I
I
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 107 of 186
New Hope Ministries
Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
ANNUAL REPORTS
The Monitoring Program shall inclnde a Baseline monitoring report conducted prior to enhancement
activities fmd a Time Zero Monitoring Report conducted within 30 to 45 days following treatmcnt
of exotics. Monitoring reports shall be submitted annually near the end of the summer growing
season until success criteria is met. Reports will include data collccted during the monitoring cvents,
a statcment of maintenancc cfforts within thc mitigation areas and conclusions/rccommendations
rcgarding any changes to improve the mitigation site.
PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE
February
March
April
May
Scptembcr
September
September
September
September
2005
2005
Baseline Report
Complete Exotic Control and Supplemental Planting in Mitigation
Arcas
Initiate Site Construction
Time Zero Rep01t
1" Aunual RepOlt
2nd Annual Report
3,d Annual Report
4'" Annual Report
SIlo Arumal RepOlt and Final Site Inspection
2005
2005
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
W:\NHM-3\Miligatioll PIau Rev. EIS Jcv.3.06.wpd
I
I
I
"
"
I
II
I
I'
,
,
Offsite Mitigation
Location Map
COLLIER COUNTY
Aoenda Item No. 8B
January , 2UU
Page 10 of 186
~
------.............
~~
~-
'\
-~_-.<&-'~~.
\.
;
,
I'
I
I
f-
"~ I
'~-
-...._-,--:.:::::::...c...~, i: ////
...... ...... " --,~~-~~:_",.,
~''''''''--
~,
,\
~
,
! I - 75
-
<()
0>
iii
o +
55960':1:
Sable Palm Road
46900':1:
W DEXTER BENDER
AND ASSOCIATES
CNWRONHCNTA.l &- HARINE CONSU.lrfNC
FORT HYERS, FE, (941) 334-36'80 REVISED:
~,
.,~"-...
-~
/-
_/
~././
Parcel 2
" .~n.
-~
II AVE.'!..
~ .<wt..lt.
.. .~I
. .
, ~~
. .Ave.&.(.
1'f. .\'Lu.
r.no. A"" I.t.
Mh..w;.1LL
""',"AYC-",-
"MAW-at.
"'fN.AY'[; .e.
IItlt AYE. 1[.
Parcell
PE'RN/r USE' ONLY;
Nor FOR CONSrRUCr/ON-
AprIl 00. 2003 8: 59; 39 I
Drawing; NHM4PROJECT_lOCADON,QWO (Ol._ I
New Hope
Ministries
~~ C)
,,- C) I-..
,0 ru L..i
.,JO'> t:
C)
C)
~ L..i
-J
C) ~
I~
I
~
~
G
~a....
~s:
!.J.J~
~
IlE
o
I
I-
I
V1
Cl
t--.Ll)L..i
"".t--.
..0.:""
<:~
a~G.i
G~~
~a<(
v, 1- Q::
~ E"- -
~ ~g' /1-
~~ 'B~( ~
~ ~ ~~ a\
':J '" -,.,
~ 1'1~
~~ ~~
rg~ :3~
, \3"~
~ l:1-~
~~"?i
~~ "'
~..... .<
f:\;h ~ 9)
~ 0 W
p:
~
00
~'-
~Qj
!JJ~
Q:~
~
~
~
-.,
;.l>
g "
I")
- .
. ~
<.o~
'......-'---
~~
lC,Ll)
""to-,
I I
c,) -
_Ll)
..............
;-'<:J'<:J
II Q) Q)
Cl'<:J'<:J
to ~ ~
-.,
~.s.s G G
Cl <J () ()
'<:Jlll>
Q) ::,::' Cl I")
'<:J Q) Q) Cl ..:
,,-- "-
:>-2-2 ~ "-
.S ~~ 0
0"..".. ~ ~
ll.ll.ll 0 <:J
::, - -
",'\';'\'; EO '"
~:2:2 ~ :E
Q) I I c; I:::
~ '" '" .'2 .2
......... \)"'tl -I-..t Cl.
~~~ ~ 13
Q~...... l;J) r-
" <J <J Q) ,
,,~G::G: :::-. IJ.)
I::: Cl EO
Q) G: Q) 11) ~ ~
",.1:::.1::: Q
.c:QQ ~ g-
Q L.j Vi
-I")
~~~~ ~u
c: -~
'1''''1' .
""'"
1&3
V1
S
~
~ "
i:i1 C/) ~~
e k1 ~~
,,",h~{
i:i1~~~
P:4 ~ ~~
~~
I\.>O~o,;,:.
"" C/)~
k1 C/)"'<l~
~~~~
i:i1 ~~
Qe~::;j
,c;,,<:;~
.....~s:;
~ "r
.-l-
/'~
- /. +
'\.. J
x-(" ,
-r
00'"
I ~=
..0
, ~;::
>-~
mill
I ::l OJ
ern
I' ~Q
~
;::::
~
;::::a..
~~
!JJ~
~
~
If
o
If)
CJ
<Ql!)L...J
~ ,."
~9,~
aili "
i:::?:t5
u~<:
~Q"
v, '" Ct:
o
o h
(\J L...J
tw
~
co
co
~ L...J
-J
o
co V)
.", EUl
~ ci.g
:"",~;j~
~~ :~
<:::i "" -oJ
~ I')(.}
~yj 81;
8~ g~
~ '3 ~~
~~~/~
~r..::; ""
~ ..
...... E--., e
~ " ffi
p:
"
9)
~t'.J
~Q)
Y.J~
~~
::t
~
g' ~
"
~
~
e'O
""
" I
<xJ-
---.:~
'-
el:Jl:J
""'~
o l:J v
" ~
l!),. "'
-: l;:;'S ,: ~
'-.,..'_ 'U 'U
" " "
~8g CJ "
l:J :;, '" ci <Q
tJ~Q - ~
:::'0-'--
,c:- Q,) "'"
_ Q)~ - lb
"~,, \: '-
u ,)..u 0 C)
" v ~ c-
<0 't {:; ~ Ol
~ 'R:t' ~ :S
~::t I c: ~
~ I '" 0
.,tI}'tJ :;: Q
.jQ l:J 0 "
u Q 0 ....... 15
{) Q ~ (lJ. .......
~ '" ~ 0> c:
:;;;...... (J Q.) Q,)
"t::,C5 ~ li: S E
c:;- li: ,,'"
Q.l........ m '- -
'" ~.~ a: ~ 2:
--.J 'S: ci: L...J Ji
If)G..
u::::;~~~D
::::.--
4:~_:::
'l''l''l' ~
C::i
~
:so
:):!
~ t..\
k1 \I) ~~
~~~~
k1 ~~~
Q:) 0 ~~
s'"
i"l-'O~~
.....\I)~
kl \I) <\j~
~ ~ ~9l
k1 ~~
Qe~~
",-<<::i~
~~~
0.: ~.....
;s:: '"
Attachment AA.f.ii.
Water Quality Loading Analysis
\
L
I
I
.JI,genda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 111 of 186
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 112 of 186
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES
. ".,.
Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Rel!ulations
Preparedfor:
New Hope Ministries
7675 Davis Boulevard
Naples, Fl
239.348,(1] 22
PREPARED BY:
Josh Fruth
D e DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.
2154 Trade Center Way, Suite #3
Naples, FL 34109
DA VI DSO N 239.597.3916
ENGiNEERII'-lG
JANUARY 2007
JAN - 2 2007
Ii
I
I
ON, . ., Registration No. 47161
cA'l JAMES J. LL, P.R, Registration No. 57155
RUSSELL A. JOImSON, P.E., Registration No. 39622
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 113 of 186
Table of Contents
t'A~'"
1.1 -General........................................ ...............................,....................2
1.2-Existing Conditions-Pre-development.......... .......................................... ..2-3
. ",,"'
1.3-Methodologyand Analysis for Pre-development Conditions....................... ... .2-7
2.1-Proposed Conditions-Post-development.... ........ ........,.. ,... .......,.. ....... .... ... ...8
2.2-Methodology and Analysis for Post-development Conditions....................... .8-13
3.I-Conelusion......... ............. ,.................... .................... ....... ...... ...... .....13
References..........,......... ................,..,....,...... .......... ..................,.......... ..14
Appendix A - Existing Vcgetation/FLUCCS Site A<"'rcage Breakdown
...".(""'~. .
I
1_'
1
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 114 of 186
1.1- General
For purposes oftlle "Evaluation of Alternative StorIDwater Regulations" for New
Hope Ministries, both pre- and post-development loadings were ca,lculated using the
concentration-based method or H<Uper Method (Harper). The pre- and post-development
loadings were calculated by estimating the runoff volumes and eharacteri&iics of rainfall
for the site's conditions.
New Hope Ministries is an existing 39.89 +/- acres, commercial development that
has cUlTently developed one phase of construction. The project is located at 7675 Davis
Boulevard, East of Santa Barbara Boulevard, within Collier County, Florida. New Hope
Ministries is part of the New Hope Ministries PUD, AR# 3601.
""'"
1.2 - Existing Conditions - Pre-devclomnent
TIle project site, as previously mentioned, has currently completed phase one of
construction. 0.78 ac:fr of dry retention area Was not included in the estimates for pre-
development loadings, since dry retention systems produc.e levels of pollutants too small
to c.alc.ulate. This is due to the fact that dry retention areas are desigued to function as
pollutant removal systems and typic.ally allow the infiltration of pollutants into permeable
soils or through an evaporation proc.ess (Harper). However, the removal of these
pollutants by the dry retentions system was c.alculated (to assume worst c.ase scenario)
and the results c.an be seen in 1.3.f. The following is the land use breakdown for the
existing conditions (pre-development conditions for the Evaluation of Alternative
Stormwater Analysis):
Building
Pavement
U land Preserve Woods
Preserve Not Flowing to
Wetlands Woods
Wetlands
o en Spac.e
D Retention System 0.91
TOTALS 39.89 Acres
-Directly Connected Impervious Area
Ground Cover I Soil Types:
Woods, Low-Intensity Commercial, Paved Parking Lots, Open Space (USDA, 2-5 to 2-7)
Hydrologic. Soil Group (HSG)
-->Collier COtUlty = HSG-A - Sand (USDA, A-9)
2
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 115 of 186
From TR-55, one can calculate the composite nDClA number using the imporvious land
that is not directly connected to the water management system. In this oaso "j'.
approximately 85% of the impervious areas will be DClA and thus, ]5% wil(\)e nDClA.
Impervious Areas:
->assume ] 5% to be nDCIA
->from Table 1.2: 0.73 acres + 3.63 acres = 4.36 acres ->X 15% = 0.65 acres ofnDClA
And 3.71 acres ofDClA
-> 10.93% impervious and 9.30% DCIA! . "?'"
1.3 - Methodologv and Analysis for Pre-development Conditions
In the following methodology and analysis, one will see the evaluation of
alternative stonnwater loadings for pre-development ofthe New Hope Ministries site,
Because this method considers site-specific hydrologic characteristics in estimating
pollutant loadings, the accuracy of this method is considerably greater than traditional
methods, Pre- and post-development loadings are calculated using estimates of runoff
volumes and runoff characteristics, TIlese runoff volumes for the Fort Myers area were
obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1960-1993 (Harpcr, 2,1),
Throughout this time period the average annual rainfall was determined to be 53,15
inchcs per year (Harper, 2-3), Thc aforementioned runoff characteristics take into
consideration all land uses categories jn Southwest Florida and thus, result in a series of
annual rUIloff coefficients used in this analysis, For fUlther explanation of this
methodology, please see tbe "Evaluation of Altemative Storm water Regulations for
Southwest Florida - Final RepOlt," by Harper and Baker.
1.3. a ~ Estimate curve lIumher/rulloff coefficiellt:
I. Woods -> curve number3 for Woods in good condition in HSG-A is 30
2. Pavement -> curve number3 for Pavement in HSG-A is98 .
3. Commercial (Building) ->. curve number3 for Commercial areas in HSG-A is 89
4. Open Space -> curve number for Open Space area in good condition in HSG-A
is 39 .
5. Wetlands -> due (0 the large evaporation losses in this area, a runoff coefficient
of 0.225 will be used, perexumple (Baker and Harper, 4-1) ~__,.
3 -All curve numbers were obtained from Technical Report - 55 or TR-55 from the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Conservation Engineering
Division, Figure 2-2, see References
1.3.b - RUlloff Coefficiellts. Table-4-Baker alld Haroer:
I
I
1-
I. Woods -> 0% DCIA, nDClA curve number of 30 = 0.002
. 2. Pavement -> 100% DClA, nDCIA curve number of 98 = 0.782
3. Commercial (Building) -> 100% DClA, nDCIA curve nUlllber of89 = 0.782
4. Open Space -> 0% DCIA, nDClA curve number of39 = 0.0064 by interpolation
5. Wetlands -t see abovc
NOTE: Runoff Coefficients are equal ~o the "C" value assigned when calculating lhe Annual Runoff Volumes.
3
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 116 of 186
l.l.e - Calculate Annual Runoff Volumes: ';1;
-+Assume 53.15" for Mean AlUlUal Rainfall; see explanation above
. . ( X) 1ft
Annual Runoff Volume = (Area) MAR C 12in' ac:fi; Eq. 2.1
Where:
. .""..
IvlAR = Mean Annual Rainfall, (inches)
,A..rea = area oflalld use (acres)
C = see I.3.b for each land use
Using Eq. 2.1, the results for Annual Runofl:' Volumes by land use are calculated below.
Woods (preservc) -+ AI'eas which do not flow into the Wctlands, (Appendix A):
Annual Runoff' Volume = (] .4ac\f53.I 5in )(0.002) 1ft = O.0124ac -- (II J'r
." . 1\" 12in . .
Woods (Upland Preserve) -+ Areas witlI flow into the Wetlands, (Appendix A):
Annual Runoff Vo!ume = (lZ.5acX53.15inXO.OOZ') 1ft =O.llac- filyr
.. IZin'
Pavement:
Annual Runoff Volume=: (3.63acX53.lSinXO.782) 1~ = 16.078ac - ft / yr
lZm
Commcrcial (Building):
Annual RUlloffVolume= (O.73acX53.15inXO.78Z) 1~ = 3.464ac- ft! yr
IZm
Open Space:
Annual Runoff Volume = (6.02ac)(S3.15in)(O.0064) I~ = O.I71ac - ft/ yr
12m
Wetlands:
Annual Runo.ffVolunie= (14.7ac)(S3, 1 SinXO.22S) I~n = 14.649ac - ft/ yr
l.3.d - Estimate Runoff Characteristics for Land Uses:
Referenced from Table 7, Baker and Harper
N = Nitrogen, P = Phosphorus; All runoff concentrations are typical for the land use
4
Agenda Item No. 813.
January 29, 2008
Page 117 of 186
Undeveloped Woods (preserve):
p~:,"
N '" I.09mg/1
P", O.046mg I I
Wetlands:
N '" 1 ,Olmg / I
P", O.09mgl I
'y-
Pavement: -> same as Low-Intensity Commel'cial:
N "'I ,J2mg/l
P=O.18mgll
i
Low-Intensity Commercial (Bllilding):
N =d.12mg II
P '" O.18mg/l
Ol)en Space: -> Use Low-Density Residential since the #' s acc.ount for recreational and
open space loading rates
N = 1.64mg fl
P",OJ91mg/l
i.._
J.3.e - CalculatePre-del'elo/JIllellt Load/liltS:
Nor P, Load = (A,l43,560.ft2) 7.48gal (3.785/)(TC{ lkg ); Eq. 2.2
\ ac .ft' gal \106mg
UNn:s'" kg Nj)r P fyr
Where:
Ai = amount of tot a! runofffromlalld use, (ac - ft f yr)-> see l.3.c
TC= Tota! Concentration from land use, (mg f I) -> see l.3.d
NOTE: use either Nitrogen or Phosphorus concentrations to find Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus foc each land use
~.-'.
Using equation 2.2:
Undeveloped Woods (preserve) -> Areas not discharging to Wetlands:
TotalN '" (O.OI24ac ~.ft / yrl43,560ft2) 7.48gal (3.785/)1.09mg ( l:g ) = 0.D17kg - N f yr
\ ac ft' gal I 10 mg
L
TotalP = (O.OI24ac -.ftl yr )(43,560.ft2) 7.48gal (3.785/) O.046mg ( Ikg ) = 7.03XIO-4 kg - PI yr
ac .ft' gal I l06mg .
5
,l\genda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 118 of 186
Wetlands: -> includes wetland areas plus 50% of upland ar.eas draining into the wetlands
NOTE: Thls takes into cOn/.,deration the amounts ofrainfnU allowed to percolate into the grO"'!.q~..up1and areas.
,;..;"
Wetland Discharge = (14.649ao- fllyr XO.llac- ftl yr(0.50))= 14.704kg -N I yr
TotalN = (14.704ao - ft I yJ 43,560ft2) 7.48gal (3.7851) I.Olmg( lkg -) = 18.32kg _ N I yr
\ ac ftl gal I 106mg ...,..., .
I
I
TotalP = (14.649ac - ftl yrl.43,560jt' J 7.48gal (3.785/) O.09mg ( l~g ) = 1.63kg -Plyr
~. ac /Il gal. I 1 0 mg
Pavement:
T IN-(16078 . iii .)(43,560ft"j7.48gal(3,785/JJ.l2mg( Ikg ,)-2221k NI .
"ota - ), ac.- t )'1 ---- -.- - - . g-' VI
'. ae. fl3 gal. I 10' mg . '
TotalP = (1 6.078ac _ it I yri43,560//2 '] 7.48gal (3. 785t1 O.1811l.fL( I~,g )' = 3.57kg - P I yr
, ae . fI' gal) I J 0 mg
Low-Intensity COlllmercial (Building):
TotalN = (3.464ac - ftl yJ 43,560/1'), 7.48gal (3.7851)1.l2mg ( I~g ) = 4.785kg -N I yr
\ ae ft3 gal I 10 mg
TotalP = (3.464ae _ j/f y,./ 43,560ft') 7.48fal (3.7851) 0.18mg ( I:g ) = 0.769kg _ P I Yl"
\ ae ft gal I 10 mg
Open Space:
~.,.......-.
TotalN = (0.171ae - ft I yJ 43,5601t') 7.48gal (3.7851) 1 ,64mg ( l:g ) = 0.346kg _ N I yr
\ ae .If gal 1 10 mg
TotalP = (0.1 74ac- ft/ y,./ 43,560ft2) 7.48fal (3.7851) 0.191mg ( l:g ) = 0.041kg _PI yr
. \ ae fl gal I 10 mg
6
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 119 of 186
1.3.(- Total Pre-del'elooment Loadinl!s
-+ Add the results of each land use from I.3.e:
",.~"l~';
(""',j
TotalN '" (0.01 7kgN I yrX18.32kgN I yrX22.21kgN / yrX4.785kgN I yr X0.346kgN / yr)'" 45.678kg - m I yr
TotalP '" (7.03XW-' kg? I yr Xl.63kgPl yrX3.57kgPl yr XO.769kgP I yr XO.041kgPI yr)'" 6.0l1kg- TP I yr
. ""'"
1.3. I! - Calculate Mass Pollutant Removal with DYI' Retention Areas-Pre-Developmcllt:
-+ For the purposes of these calculations the dry retention area will provide 0.25" of
pretrcatment becausc the system provides 0.78 ac-ft of storage and this translates to
approximately 0.25" over the entire site's area. Therefore, calculations will be done
nsing the removal efficiency for 0.25" (Harper, Table B.l).
-+ DCIAt Areas = 9.30%, see Table 1.2 and calculations above
-+The composite nOll.DCIA number using the land use breakdown can be seen on pages
2 and 3 ofthis report.
-+Assuming worst case scenario l1'om 1.3.b, the lunoff coefficient used in the following
removal calculations will be 98.
. Now, using Table B.l (Harper, TableB.l), the calculated composite nDCJA curve
number from above, the DCJA percentage, and linear intc111olation, the removal
efficiency is approximately equal to 32.4%.
The mass load of total nitrogen and phosphorus removed by the pre-development dry
retention system can be calculated using the rcsults from 1.3.f aud the removal efficiency
01'32.4% (see above).
Mass Load orrotal Nitrol!en and Phosphorus Removed bv the Drv Retention Areas
TNremoved '" (32.4% X45.678kgm I yr) = J 4.80kgTN I yr
TPO'emoved:. (32.4%X6.0 11kgTP/ yr)= 1. 95kgTPI yO'
.....,-,,-
Retnainin~ Mass Load ofrotal Nitrogen and Phosohorus after Drv Retention Treatment
TN remaining = (45.678kgTN I yr)- (14.80kgm I yr) = 30,88lcgTN I yr; Result #1
TP remaining = (6.0J lkgTPI yr)-(1.95kgTPlyr)=4.06kgTPI yr; RClfult #2
L.
Post-development loadings cannot exceed the total pre.development loading values, as
calculated in Result #1 and Result #2.
7
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 120 of 186
2,1 - Proposed Conditions - Post-development
7Jii,C
At final build out (after phase three of construction) the project site will have the
following conditions:'
I
i
'''l'''-
3.85
16.14
5.73
8.21
3.56
2.40 DCIA
.~ TOTALS_ 39.,8LAcres...._.,_____ ___________.__
-Directly COilllected Impervious Area
2 Upland preselve and Wetlands do not exist under post-development conditions
).. The lake is a directly connected impelvious area, however stormwater managcment
systems have incidental mass inputs of pollutants and therefore, are not included in the
post-development loading calculations.
Ground Cover / Soil Types (same as pre-development conditions):
Woods, Low-Intensity Commercial, Paved Parking Lots, Open Space (USDA, 2-5 to 2-7)
Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG)
-->Collier County = HSG-A - Sand (USDA, A-9)
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
Impervio!!s Areas:
-->56.13% impervious aud 50.11% DCIAI
2.2 ~ Methodologv and Analvsis for Post-development Conditions
The same standards and values apply for post-development conditions as outlined
in section 1.3, 1.3a, and 1.3.b. ~.
2.2.a.. Calculate Annual Runoff Volumes:
--Assume 53.15" for Mean Annual Rainfall; see explanation above
Using Eq.2.1, the results for Annual Runoff Volumes by land use are calculated below:
Woods (preserve) :-- Wetlands have been mitigated for
Ann!!al RUlwffVolwne= (S.73ac XS3.l5in)(O.002) 1~ = O.051ac - ft / yr
12m
g
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 121 of 186
Pavement: ,,,,; .
r"J
Annual Run()flVolume~ (16.14aC)(53.15inXo.782)/2~: ~ 55.90ac- fI I yr
Commercial (Building):
Annual Run()ffVolume~ (3.85acX53.15inXO.782) /;n ~ 13.33ac -./1 I yr
..""," .
Open Space:
Annual RunoffVolume~ (8.21ac)(53.15inXO.0064) l~ ~ 0.233ac - fI I yr
12m
2.2.b . Estimate RUlIoffCharacteristics for Lalld Uses:
All estimated runoff characteristics arc the samc for each land use as outlined in section
J. 3. d.
2,2.c - Calculate Post-developmellt Loadiltf!s:
Nor p, Load ~ (A,)(43,560fl2) 7.48~al (3.7851)(TC{ l;,g ); Eq. 2.2
ac ,/I gal '\ 10 mg
lJND'S ""kg NorP/yr
I
I
I
Where:
Ai = amount of total runoff from land use, (ac - fI I yr)...... see 2.2.a
TC= Total Concentration from land use, (mg I I) ...... see 1.3.d
NOTE: use ~ithcr Nitrogen or Phosphorus concentrations to find Total Nitrogen and Total PhosphOlU8 for each land use:
Using equation 2.2:
~",....,.".
Undeveloped Woods (Preserve):
I
I
L
TotalN = (0.051ac- fl I yr{ 43,560fl2) 7.48gal (3,785/) 1.09mg ( lkg ) = 0.069kg -N I yr
'\ ac fl' gal I' 106mg
TotalP = (0.05 lac _ fll yJ 43,560fl') 7.48ga/ (3.7851) 0.046mg ( lkg ) = O,0029kg - PI yr
. \ ac fl3 gal I l06mg
9
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 122 of 186
Pavement:
TotalN = (55.90ac - jt / yr(43,560jt2 J 7.48gal (3.7851J 1.12mg ( l~g J~:77.2Ikg -N / yr
ac fi' gal I 10 mg
TotalP = (55.90ac- jl / yr(43,560jI2 J 7.48gal (3.785/) 0.18mg ( l:g ) = 12.41kg - P / yr
aefi' gal I 10 mg "'JO"
Low-Intensity Commercial (Building):
i
,..
]' tiN (1333 1'/ {.43,S60jl')7.48gal(3.78Sl)1.l2mg( lkg ) i841k N'/
o.a = .. ac - It yr , .-- = . g - yr
. . ac It. gal l 10 mg .
TotalP = (13,33ae- fi / yJ 43,S 60ft' j7.48gal (3.78SI'j' O.18mg ( J~g -) = 2.96kg- P / yr
1 ael It' gall. 10 mg
Open Space:
TotalN = (0.233ae - ft / VI' /43,S60fl')7.48gal (3.78S/J' 1.64mg (~~g 1 = 0.47kg - N / yr
. ,. \ ae ,ft' ~ gal I 106 mg )
TotalP = (0.233ae _ ft / y,.f 43,S60ft') 7.48gal (3.78S/) 0.191mg ( lkg ) = 0,05Skg -P / yr
\ ae jl3 gal I IO'mg
i.2.d - Total Post-development Loadinfls
-> Add the results of each land use from 2.2,c:
TotaiN = (O.069kgN / yrX77.2JkgN /yrXI8.4JkgN /yrX0.47kgN / yr)= 96.16kg-TN / yr
TotalP= (O,0029kgP / yr X12.41kgPiyrX2.96kgP/ yrXO,OSSlcgP/ yr)= lS.43lcg - TP / yr
--:-~,.
2.2.e - Calculate Mass Polluta"t Removal with Drv Rete"ti/JII Areas-P/Jst-Devel/JlJlllellt:
-> For the purposes of these calculations the dry retention areas will provide over 1" of
pretreatment, but not> 1.25" of pretreatment. Therefore calculations will be done using
the removal efficiency for I" (Harper, Table B.4).
DCIAt Areas = SO.1 I %, see Table 2.1 above
From TR-55, one can calculate the composite non-DCJA number using the impervious
land that is not directly connected to the system. Since 25% of the DeIA area is assumed
10
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 123 of 186
to flow thru the lake, the nDCJA (non-Directly Connected Impervious Area) area is
simply: ;)f
nDClA ~ (25% XI9.99acres) '" 5.0acres; Eq. 2.3
From Eq. 2.3 and the curve numbers from 1.3.a, the composite non-DCJA curve number
is calCulated below:
nDCIA '" (19,99ac(98)+ 5.0ac(981) '" 98, Eq. 2.4
19,99ac+5.0ac
. '1"'-
Now, using Table BA (Harper, Table BA), the calCulated composite nDCIA curve
number fi'om Eq. 2.4, the DCJA percentage, and linear interpolation, the removal
efficiency is approximately equal to 73.5%.
As previously mentioned, 25% ofthe DCJA area will flow thru the lake and 75% will
flow thru the dry retention system prior to discharging into the preserve and eventually
into the lake, Using the land uses from Table 2, I and the results fi'om 2.2,d, the total
loadings flowing into each treatment system are calculated below:
Lake Pollutants
Tot(lIN ~ (25%X96.16kgTN / yr)= 24,02kgTN /yr; Eq; 2.5
TotaIP",(25%XI5.43kgTP/ yr)= 3,86kgTP/ yr; Eq. 2.6
Drv Retention Pollutants
TotalN "'(75%X96.16kgl'N I yr)~ 72.08kgTN / y"; Eq. 2.7
TotalP", (75%X15.43kgTPlyr) = 1 1.57kgTPlyr ; Eq. 2.8
!
The mass load of total nitrogen andphosphoJUs removed by the. dry retention system can
be calCulated using Eq. 2.7- 2.8 and the removal efficiency of73.5% (see above).
Mass Load of Total Nitrol?:en and Phosphorus Removed bv the Drv Retention Areas
I
I
1'Nremoved ~ (73.5%Xn.08kgTN I yr) ~ 52.98kgTN / yr; Eq. 2.9
TPremoved=(73.5%Xl1.57kgTPI yr) '" 8.50kgTP/yr; Eq. 2.10
~-.""",,.
Remaining Mass Load of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus after Drv Retention Treatment
IN remaining", (n.08kgTN I yr)-(52.98kgTN / yr)= 19. 1 OkgTN Iyr; Eq. 2.11
TP remaining = (1 1. 57kgTPI yr)-(8.50kgTP/ yr)= 3.07kgTP/ yr; Eq. 2.12
2.2.(- Evaluate tile Stol'mwatel' Tl'eatment bv tile Lake:
L
Since the stOtmwater management system is interconnected with the preserve
arcas and the lake (dry detention discharges into the preserve after treatment and
eventually will sheet flow into the lake if attenuation is necessary), it is assumed that on a
11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 124 of 186
worst case scenario, all of the remaining pollutants will be treated in the lake (more than
likely this will not happen because the pollutants will either evaporate orper<!j;1,late).
Therefore, the calculated results from Eq. 2.11 and Eq. 2.12 will be added to the nitrogen
and phosphorus results from Eq. 2.5 and Eq. 2.6.
Total Lake Pollutants
TotalN = (24.02kg1N I yr)+(19.lOkg1N I yr)'" 43. 12kgTNI yr; Eq. 2.13
TotaIP=(3.86kgTPI yr)+(3.07kgTPI yr)=6.93kgTPlyr; Eq. 2.14
y-
Lake Detention Time
Lake Detention Time = (LV,ac- flXARI,ac- fll yr{365days.) =11 days I yr; Eq. 2.15
~. Iyr
"''here:
LV = Proposed Lake Volume, (ac - fi)
ARI = Annual Runoff Inputs, (itC - fi I yr), see 2.2. a above
The oalculated Lake Detention Time is as follows:
(' '. ' J
. . " ,1 365da s ,
LakeDetenllonlzme=(27.27aC-/d.. '.Jl y, =144davs;Eq.2.16
. \,69.514ac- fllyr Iyr .
Estimated Total Nitrogen (TN) Removal
NOTE: lbe following equation is from Figuro3 (Bokernnd Harper, 3~11)
y = 8,4216Ln(x)+ (2,7.25)= removal% ;Eq. 2.17
-I-Rem()vm (lfTN as a function of Time Ifill Wet Deten{jon Pond, whore x is equal to the calculated Lake Detention Time
Removal Percentage = 8.4216L/1(144)+ (27.25) = 69.10%
"'";"(....,..-.
y = 8.0847Ln(x)+ (44.583) = removal% ; Eq. 2.18
-foRemoval ofTPas a function of Time. in a Wet Detention Pond, where x is equal to the calculated Lake Detention Time
Removal Percentage = 8.0847 Ln(144) + (44.583) = 84.76%
Mass Load of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removed bv the Lake
--Use calculated results from Eq. 2.13, Eq. 2.14, Eq. 2.17, andEq. 2.18
1Nremoved = (69.10%X43.l2kg1N Iyr) = 29.80kgTN / yr; Eq. 2.19
TPmnoved= (84.76%X6.93kgTPlyr)= 5.87kgTPI yr; Eq.2.20
12
Agenda Item No, 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 125 of 186
Remaining Mass Load of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus after Lake Tr~l',tment
-+Use calculated results from Eq. 2.19 and Eq. 2.20
TN remaining = (43.12kgTN f yr)- (29.80kgThr f yr) = 13. 32kg1N f yr; Eq. 2.21
TP remaining = (6.93kgTP/ yr)-(S,S7kgTP/ yr)= \.06kgTP/yr; Eq. 2.22
. ",,","'
3.1 - Conclusion
As stated in the "Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Re!,,'ulations for Southwest
Florida," the pre-development loadings must be less than the post-development loadings
in order for the proposed site conditions to be acceptable (Harper). In this particular
study, the mass input of pollutants, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus,were calculated
for both pre- and post-development conditions (section I and 2 ofthe Methodology and
Analysis above). Although is not required to show the. rem oval of pollutants when a pre-
development wator management system is being altered (Harper), results from removal
calculations (1.3.g), further prove that the post-development loadings were considerably
lower than the existing pre-development; seo Table 3, I below. By using a combinatiQli
system of both wet and dry retention f treabnent areas, the storm water management
system can operated with an above average mass polluiant removal rate; thus, assuring
that, even at worst case scenario (see 2.2.f), the system will still have an efficient
removal percentage aud process.
.......~'....
I
L
13
A(Jenda Item No. 8B
- January 29,2008
Page 126 01186
References
Harper, Harvey H., and David M. Baker, Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater
Regulations for Southwest Florida, Environmental Research and Design, Inc.
Orlando: Rev. September 8, 2003,
"Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds-Technical Release-55." United States
Department of Agriculture, Conservation Engineering Division. June 1986.
..~-,
~'-~;...,..'-
14
Appendix A
Existing VegetationlFLUCCS Site Acreage Breakdown
t
i-
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 127 of 186
;~~l'...
'",..
-",'''''. .
(l) (j (j
COoO"" tl tl (j (j (j (j tl (j (j (j (j
00000 tl tl tl tl tl tl tl tl
o~ ~
IciN~ l1) OJC)O)f'...~
12 _0 <oNJ 00 <0
I en 00 t.> I I
ENN - C\jr-rj'<},...::::: c:iC'.i c:i c:i
(j) ;>-,-:-,," "C -
'::':::ro'.D
1(0::::; D:l ~
,--ocro
i ~.,~o...
:J) C)
c{
0)
I
~ .",..
'-'
I
I
~
~
c;:
.0
-......;
~
&
~
tl
~~t.>
C),'" ::J
li)~~
I 1-2
\,Q_(l)
~~~
888.2 ~~
::J::J::J~ C)C)
<1.l<1.l(l)(l) l1)0)
t3t3t3~ I I
-- -- -- tl <0 <0
~~~~ ~~
'-
::;"":::"":::"":::...,tltltl
-Q-Q-Q9..,t.>t.>t.>
o ::J ::J ::J
~~\:Jc:<1.l(l)(l)
(l)<1.l(l)tlt315t3
\:J""C:lI::lt.>---
~ ~ ~,-Q ~ ~ ~ tl
c: c: c: ::J t.>
'_ '....'_ CI) :::...,:::...,:::..., ~
(j t.>~ t.>~ t.>~ -Q -Q -Q 15.~
't 't 't 't I::l I::l I::l Q) {,
'R 'R 'R 'R {l {l {l ~:50...,~
Q.. ..c::..c::..c::..c::~~t)t.> ~ .J:::o R
::J ::. '..... -Q I 0 tJ.:._.
I ::..., I::l I I I I.S.S.S {, ~ ~ ..
~~c: ~t.>I::l<1.l(l)b .J:::
's ~ .:3 ~ {g ~ {g {g ~ {g ..c:: 't ~ .S .S Ci:: -g.~
-Qg OOOOOOOI!;2tlo...Q tl:t
li:.QOOOOOOO.......:s. (l)-.J
81::l O~~~~~~~ .J:::~I I c: \:J
'- c: r~ r~ ..... ....... ..... ..... ~ ............ tl - 0........ \:J c:
..... t) u, '-J tl tl tl tl tl tl tl <..l I <1.l tl
".... ::J r:-- r:-- Ci:: I~ i":"- r:-- i":"-::::t ~ ~ ~ ..Q
~ c:.Q ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ (l) (l) (l).~ ~ CI)
g tl .~ 0 (l) (l) (l) (l) (l) (l) (l) tl 0 I... I... I... i5 .2 15
<1.l -e Q313 .S .S .S .S .S .S ,S Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ :50...,.!2 0
Q~~li:.o...QQQQo...o...~~(j~(j:tQ~
CI) C\iNJ"l-
8 ~~~~ C\J"l-:r:o... :r:
~c)~-~~~~~~~"l-~~"l-"l-i.C)C)~
NC)~<O-----~-~-~~C\i~~-
Ll:--~"l-"l-"l-"l-"l-"l-~~<o<o<o<o<oKOJ
j..---
Attachment A.4.g.i
Protected Species Assessment
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 129 of 186
i\genda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 130 of 186
PROTECTED SPECIES ASSESSMENT
AND
WADING BIRD SURVEY
for
New Hope Ministries
I
I
[
I
I
I
I
I
Section 04, Township 50 South, Range 26 East
Collier County, Florida
September 2002
Updated: June 2004
Updated: August 2005
Updated: July 2006
Prepared by:
W. DEXTER BENDER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2052 Virginia Avenue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 131 of 186
l ,-
INTRODUCTION
The site is located next to and to the north of Davis Boulevard, south ofl- 7 5, and west of C.R. 951
in Section 04, Township 50S, Range 26E, in Collier County, Florida. Residential housing borders
the paree!to the east and north, and vaeant land borders the paree! to the west.
SITE CONDITIONS
The proteeted spedes survey was eonducted during the morning and early afternoon (approximately
9:00 am to I :00 pm) on July 24, 2006. During the survey, temperaturcs wcre in the upper 80's F,
winds were ealm and skies were mostly sunny. Previous assessment of the subjeet paree! for
proteeted spedes oecurred on May 18, 2001, May 22, 2001, May 30, 2001 and June 11, 2004. In
addition to the protected species survey, wading bird surveys were conducted (lut'ing the carly
morning hours (approximately 6:45 am to 9:00 am) of July 24,25,26 and 27, 2006 and during the
late evening hours (approximately 6:30 pm to 8:30pm) of July 27, 2006 and Au),'tlst 3, 2006.
Temperatures during the morning surveys were in the upper 70's F, winds were calm and skies were
mostly clear. Temperatures during the evening survey wcre in the lowcr 80's F, winds were calm
and skies were cloudy.
VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION
The table below displays thc six (6) distinct vegetation associations found on the subject parcel.
These vegetation assodations were identified using the Florida Land Use Cover Classification
System (FLUCCS) mld are shown on the table below. We have also ineluded a description of each
FLUCCS assoeiation.
FLUCCS DEFINITION AFPROX. PERCENT
ACREAGE SURVEYED
411M Pine Flatwoods/melaleuca invaded 12.05 50%
411M4 Pine Flatwoods/ 0.56 50%
invaded by melaleuca (76-90%)
411 H (M-M4) Pine flatwoods, hydrie/melalcuca invaded 12,24 50%
(26-90%)
424H Melaleuca- hydric 2.32 80%
621M CypressIMelaleuca Invaded 0.75 80%
624M Pine/Cypress/Melaleuca Invaded 0.59 80%
2
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 132 of 186
FLUCCS 41lM - PINE FLATWOODS/MELALEUCA INVADED (12.05 acres)
This upland is dominated with slash pine (Pinus elliottii val'. del/sa), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens),
with 10% coverage ofmelaleuca (Melaleuca qllinqllenervia). Scattered Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthifolius), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) were also
present.
FLUCCS 41lM4 .PINE FLATWOODSI MELALEUCA INVADED (76-90%) (0.56 acres)
This subcanopy ofthis upland area is dominated by melaJeuca. Scattered poison ivy and slash pine
are al so present.
FLllCCS 41lH (M-M4) - PINE FLATWOODS. IIYDRICIMELALEUCA INVADED (12.24
acres)
These hydric pine flat woods have various degrees of mc1aleuea infestation, and include, slash pine,
scattered cypress (l'axodium distichllm), dahoon holly (flex cassinc), swamp fem (Fleclmum
serrulatum), vmious sedges and Brazilian pepper.
FLUCCS 42411 - MELALEllCAlHYDRIC(:!.32 acres)
This wetland consists of melaleuea, with scattered slash pine, cypress and poison ivy.
FLUCCS 621M- CYPRESSIMELALEUCA INVADED (0.75 acres)
This wetland area is dominated by cypress, buttonbush (Cephalanthus ocddentatis) with 20%
Brazilian pepper coverage. The midstory and ground cover stratum incl~ldes scattcred dahoon
holly, melaleuca, saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), climbing hempvinc (Mikania scalldens),
camphor weed (Pluchea odorata), beakrush (RhYltchospora spp.), and swamp fern.
FLUCCS 624M - PINE/CYPRESSIJ\illLALEUCA INVADED (0.59 acres)
This wetland area is dominated by cypress, buttonbush, slash pine with 20% Brazilian pepper
coverage. Ground cover and midstory vcgetation includes scattered dahoon holly, saltbush,
climbing hempvine, melaleuca, camphor weed, beakrush, and swamp fern.
SURVEY METHOD
We have listed the protected species of plants and wildlife that could potentially inhabit the
vegetation associations found on the subject parcel. To provide at least 50% visual coverage,
overlapping belt transects spaced approximately 100 feet apart were walked across the entire parcel.
All potential RCW cavity pine trees were inspected as well. If a sign or sighting was observed, an
aerial photograph was marked depicting the approximate location. The attached I" = 200' scale
aerial map dcpicts thc results of the survey. Obsetvations include tracks, scat, nesting or roosting
areas as well as actual sightings.
3
! .~..
I
I
I_
I
Agenda Item No. 86
January 29, 2008
Page 133 of 186
TIle wading bird survey was conducted utilizing meandering pedestrian transects through all of the
onsite wetlands during each survey event. Any signs of wading bird activity were noted.
Listed protected species which could occur on the subject parcel are as follows:
FLUCCS Species % Area Present Absent
Surveyed
411I-l&411 M Eastern indigo snake (Dlymarchon corals 50
(M-M4) couper!) ,/
Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) ,/
Gopher fi'og (Rana areolata) ,/
Southeastcl11 American kestrel (Falco sparverius
paulus) ,/
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) ,/ I
Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger I
avicennia) ,/
Fakahatchee burmannia (Burmannia .flava) ,/
Satinieaf (Cluysophyllum oliviforme) ,/
Beautiful pawpaw (Deeringothamnus pulchellus) ,/
Florida coontie (Zamiaf1oridana) ,/
FIOlida black bear (Ursus americonusfloridanus) ,/
Florida panther (Felis conco1or cO/yl) ,/
424H None 80
62lM American alligator (Alligator misslssipplensis) 80 ,/
Limpkin (A ramus guarauna) ,/
Wood stork (Mycterla amerlcana) ,/
Little blue heron (Egretta caeru1ea) ,/
Snowy egret (Egretta tlllIla) ,/
Tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor) ,/
Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridallus) ,/
Florida panther (Fells concolor coryi) ,/
W11ite ibis (Eudocimus albus) ,/
624M Florida black bear (Ursus american us floridanus) 80 ,/
Little blue heron (Egretta caerulea) ,/
Snowy egret (Egretta thula) ,/
Tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor) ,/
Florida panther (Felis calico lor coryi) ,/
4
RESULTS
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 134 of 186
DUling the course ofthe wading bird surveys, a single white ibis (Eudocimus albus) was observed in the
cxotic invadcd cypress habitat (FI,UCCS 621 M) located in the nOlih-central pmtion of the subjcct parccl.
No other wading bird species were observed during the wading hird surveys or the protccted species
survey. Thcrc arc two abandoned red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) cavity trees that have been inactive
for over cleven (I 1) years. No signs of recent RCW activity were observed, No other species listed hy
either the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission were observed during the protected species surveyor wading hiI'd surveys.
Enclosures: Location, FLUCCS, & PSA maps, and aerial
W:\NHM-3\NHM.3 PSA upda(c 07,06.wpd
I
j
I
I
5
Agenda Item No. 8B
January. 29, 2008
Page 135 of 186
FLORlDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
JULIE K. MORRIS
S;l,r:l.SOt:l.
DA vto K. MEEHAN
Sc. Petersburg
IH. "IIERKY" HlJFFMAN
Dc1tOfl:l,
JOliN D. ROOD
J1cksmnillc
QUINTON L HEDGEPETH. DDS
Mi~mi
EDWIN 1'. ROBERTS. DC
Pt:nsacola
RODNEY BARRETO
Mi",mi
.....LI..AN l. EGBllitT, Ph.D., wcultve Dilct"tor
VICTOltj. [IELLER. ^l~i~Unt v.xetutivc Dire.;.tQc
BRADLEY J. HARTMAN, DlREcrOR
OFPICEOF ENVIRONMEN"fhLSERVICP.s
(ESO}4B8-6661 IDD{8SO)488-9!i42
FAX(850)922-S619
December 24,2001
Mr, Paul K. Owen
W, Dexter Bender & Associates, lnc.
2052 Virginia A venue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Re: Collier County, Ncw Hope
Ministries, Revised Red-Cockaded
Woodpecker Mitigation Plan
Dear Mr. Owen:
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
By copy of this letter, the Office of Environmental Services of the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission is providing written approval of the Revised New Hope
Ministries Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Protection Plan, dated November 8, 2001. We
recommend that implemcntation of and complianec with this plan be included as a special
condition of all land conversion and wetland pennits, including the South Florida Water
Management Distriet permit for which you have submitted an application. Please direct copies
of all future milestone documents, ineluding demonstration of the acquisition of the land and title
transfer to the State of Florida, and agreement for management of the 15 aeres off-site mitigation
pareel by the Division of Forestry, to our Tallahassee office and our Punta Gorda office.
Please eontact me, or Mr. Jim Beever in the Punta Gorda office at (941) 575-
5765, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~th-
Bradley J. Hartman, Director
Office ofEnvirorunental Services
BJH/jwb
ENV 1-12-2
newhopeministrieswmd. wpd
(illl $w.uh M..,riJi)n Street. l'~bb~~ . Ft . )2.}<)?-l60U
WViIW,o..)riJal;"<>n~..,r...)ti{)~.<>fS
cc: Mr Earl Morgan, New Hope Ministries
Ms. Karen Jolmson, South Florida Water Managemcnt District
Ms. Sonja Durrwachtcr, Scnior Forester, Picayune Strand State Forest
Mr. Andy Eller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Mr. Bruce Boler, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. Bill Lorenz, Collier County Govemment Center
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 136 of 186
RECEiVE::i. ..
~N. DEX SENnE=' " . -.,;:<'..-
OEe 2 g 2001
I
,.-
I
[
I
I
I
,
I_
I
I
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
South Florida Ecological Services Office
1339 20fu Street
Vera Beach, Florida 32960
January 3, 2002
Paul K. Owen
W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Ine.
2052 Virginia A venue
Fort Meyers, Florida 33901
Dear Mr. Owen:
Thank you for your December 28, 2001, request for Fish and Wildlife ServiQe (Service)
concurrence with proposed modifieations to New Hope Ministries Red-Coekadecl Woodpeeker
Protection Plan. We have reviewed the information you provided as well as historic information
in our files on this projeet. After discussing the proposed modifieations with Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission staff, we eonclude that the proposed modifieatiolls are
consistent with the conservation needs of red-eockaded woodpeekers. Thus, the Service does not
objeet to the aequisition of an off-site eonservation pareel in exchangc for the on-sitc
eonscrvation parcel that is currently unoccupied by red-cockaded woodpeckers. We understand
that all protective measures currently in place for the on-site preserve will be abandoned in favor
oftlle newly acquired off-site conservation parccl.
If you have questions about this response, please contact Mike Jennings of my staff at
(561) 562-3909, extcnsion 225.
Sineerely yours,
/.(~21. ~
r
James J. Slack
Ficld Supervisor
South Florida Ecological Services Offiee
.,. ,"" t':."
"".
. ," '''-, -0
.... 'REOeIVE lI"r'"
. EX-aF.N\"li>~ II< d,,"
W.O ,...... .<c '.
. .
.r
........,. '
.
J:
JAN...; 7 2002
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Pag1! 138 of 186
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF ruSfORICAL RESOURCES
Mr. Paul Owen
W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Inc.
2052 Virginia Avenue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
July 6, 2004
RE: DHR Projcct File Number: 2004-5764
Received by DHR June 14, 2004
New Hope Ministries Parcel Along Davis Boulevard
Collier County
DearMt. Owen:
Iri accordance with the proccdUJ'es eontained in the applieable local ordinance 01' land development code,
we reviewed the referenced project for possible inlpact to cultlU1l1 resources (any prehistoric or historic
district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, 01' eligible for listing, in the National Register of
Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, archaeologieal, 01' architectural value.
We have reviewed the Florida Master Site File and our records and no cultural resoUJ'ces are known to
exist in the area of pQtential effect. Therefore, based on the information provided, it is the opinion of the
'office that no cultural resources will be affected by this undertaking.
,'If you .have any questions concerning our comments, please C(lIItact Scott Edwards, Historic
. Preservationist, by clectronic mail sedwards@dos.statejl.us, or at 850-245-633301' 800-847-7278.
. 'Sincerely,
~Jr; ~I~.n--r 5i1>O
~rec..~ P1W~4"'t\QJ'$~5
~
Frederick Gaske, Director, and
Deputy State Historic Preservation Offieer
Rl:.C..[;- "i:-:
W. DEX Bf'NDc.rl !; "',.,,''''.:.
,
,
JUL 1 2 ZOG~
),
",
500 S. Bronaugh Street. Tallahassee, Fl, 3Z399-.6ZS0 . I1ttp:/fwww.fiheritage.cam
.0 Director, Offke 0 Archaeological Rcnearch G:1lils.toric Preservation 0 Historical MU$eums
(1I5D) 24S-<;300' FAX: 245-6435 (8SQ) 245-9444' FAX: 245-9436 (8SQ) 245.;;333' FAX: 24.5-9437 (850) 245-9400' FAX: 245-6433
o PaInt Beach Regional Office (J St. Augustine Regional Office. 0 Tampa Regional QUiee
(561) 279-1475' FAX: 279-1476 (904) 825-5015' FAX: a25-5044 (813) 272-3843' FAX: 272-2340
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 139 of 186
Attaclunent - 1
NEW HOPE DAILY STORM ANALYSIS
1996-2007
Attaehed is the data depicting all daily rainfall eompiled by the COLGOV _R substation
located at the Government buildings at Airport and US41 in Naples fl'Om 1996 through
Jul. 2007. Also attached are the storm routings which conclude that a 1-day storm event
of2.1" will stage the sitc to 1 Cl.OO' NUVD. At this elevation the lake will be filled and
the preserve will begin to be utilized for onsite storage. Below is the breakdown of the
attached rainfall data:
-- -..-.---..--- ...~-+._._--
YEAR NUMBER OF DAILY
.__._----_.._-~~_._-_._-_._._._-- ~ _.~EVF,NTS 2:1,1" _m____...
1996 -- 5
-----_.._._.,,-----------~-_.__._'--_._- ---------
1997 5
..-....---- -------------- _m_______
1998 3 -~
~ _._~-----_..__.----_._.- ~._.--~---
1999 4
2000 2
2001 9
----- .. --...---...-....--...-. m. .~_.~____
2002 4
---.---. --,-._.. .~... ..-..-- .~._-----
2003 6
.-----.---
2004 --- 2
-- ------.
2005 9
2006 3
--
2007 I
AVERAGE 4.4
Aeeording to this data, the preserves onsite will begin to receive water, other than direct
falling rain, a little over 4- times per year.
aJ c"""
COO 00
O~
ON---
'7 .0
~Ol
EN~
OJ >.~
~(uQ.J
('Q;:JO)
I.:l C CO
croo...
OJ,
OJ
<(
j:;
['1",
~:t
~8
...'"
;;18
..
"
~:!l
f.j
00
!:-II"
z
o
H
t;
IllN
me<
"'
~
""'
z"
0,,"
llm
~
~
~
&<0
~~
,-
~~
&<
~~
...m
00""
g'~
...
~~
l'l~
~1:i
E~
~~
tI
h
~"'I
a~ '"
m
'"
000 H
""
. r"
'"
. ,,~ e
'"
U~~OOOO~OOQOOOOOOOOOrlOOOOOO~"OOO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5gggg~~ggggggggggggggggggggg~~g
z ., ..,.....,.,......,.,."....
"
~~~. ~O~M~mmOOOMrlOrl.~oooooooooooooo
g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
f "
~oonooomoo~.oooo~ooooo.rlaOOO~rlfu
MOOOOOO<fl\J:lO{T'lrlOOOOMOOOOOOOOOtoDI>10'!f
m . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . , . . . ,~.
"" ~
m~rlrl.,4rl~~NOOOOOFtM~'OW~~NM~~O~OOOO
Dooom~OrlO~OOOOOOO~OMWmOrlOUou.ooo
~ . .. ,.. .,. '" . . ,
"" "
~O~O~~~OOOO~O~lnO~~rlWOrlrlD~OCOOOrlrl
~ ~ c: ~ c: ~ -:: c: c: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.1: ~ ~ c:; '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ": ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ d
~ 00 0 00 0 0<"1 r'I dO d N O)~ Ii! \0 0 lJ1 rl NOO '" 0 0 U1.'1 N a
00000 a 0 t'- rl 0 0 Co 1(1 N It> WI (Tl <::I rl 0 ,.( <:3 Ul 0 Cl Cl ~ 0 0\ 0
o......,........~............ ..
,
H~OrlOOOOOrlOOO~OOOCCM~Orlrimooooo~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
""
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~zz~z~~~~~
~ ""
~ 0
~~~~~~ZZ~~~~~~~~~~~~~EZ~~~~~~~~
~
~~~x~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~~~~~~~~%~~
~
~~~~~~~~~~~z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
~rlNM~~~~WO\OrlNM~~~~romCrl~M~~~~ro~Crl
Q Mr-iMt"tr-IMt"tt"trltiNNNC'lNNC'ilNNC'ill"'1M
COriCO
OOC~
O'Ir-ION
~~~~
r-1rlOr-l
IJ)mo\O
on '"
(''IN 0 <l'
"1'NO'l"
N ~
"IliIO<I;l
cr'1NO'll
lJ),..'OW
,I (',[0'1'
N '.
OM 0\-
r-1NOt'
... ~
'V 0'\0 CO
Mrlom
... on
" "
rlrlri..-l
0000
~~;::::~
'C\
\\
~
'"
eo
H
"
,.,
"
"
~
H
~
~
"
00
~~
f;jf;j
QQ
gll
.....,
---
--
"..
.....
.. Ol
:'~~
~~~
~oo
u) HH
,,~ ~~~
~H 0
f:i~ ~@1~
r:i ~ Iil 0,..
OOlH~P<HiI
>:tJ~~~!;!
n~1:icl~
a 0 ,"0
'"gS~f,j~gj
5"l'l1l~~~
~~gg~reg
ffi
"
'"
H
~
~
I I I I I I I
~tI}E-tt;.l><l;.Jt-:l
~
<J
r:i
"g I
l!'l ~
t.1 ~ J>:
~ g ~~
>:>:>:>: ~ ei M ~~
! ii.!jl!!li
~~~~ ; ~~~:~:~:::~
~22::::
CD ,,'''0
00000
-'-0 ~
,,-
.0
.)~
c=C,J~
ill :>,..-
:.:::: ro Q)
",::>0)
DC'"
croo..
Cl.l^"")
CJ)
<(
S
i'i",
~+
M@
{-ll~
~8
fj
~~
11
00
t-'tn
1l
H
t
"'"
md
"'
"
""'
""
0'"
,.1m
~
"
~
., 0
:1~
'"
~~
l;l",
-",...
"..
m...
e;'i
"
~~
m
i'i~
~i'l
~~
~~
t:
h
i'l:'
a~ ...
'"
'"
Ol" .<
'" ....
;; ~~ ~
'"
.
'" ~~
uooo~ooooooooo~ooooooooooaooo~~o
~ooo~OOOOOOOO~~rloooooaooooo~oooo
o . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
......
>MmOOOOOOODODOWHOOOOOOONOOOONrl~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
... ...
"&OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOONOOOO
o QOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOMCOOOOooooooao
o ,.......,.,....,...,.,...,....
&'
~ooo~oooooom~O~OOONOOO~riworlw~O~
MOOOMOOOODOO~OrlOOOOOOO~oMoMNmoM
U'l... ...,."........,.... - ..,.
......
OMOOOw~rlOM~rl~OOW~OooO~~MaONrloOmm
~QOoorlrloomOO~ooOMOOODOOMOO.-tooo~o
'1l' ,...., ,..,..... ... ,..".......
,..1
~OrlrlwmO~OOOOOOOOOOMOO~ND~mrlDroo~o~o
00 N,...l rl 0 0 0 0 III a DO C'I oDeD rlllllll f"llllaJ 00 D, 10 0 0
. ......., ,....,....,..,..,.,.,.
,iri rl rl
m~rl~ODOOOO~N.rlrlOONNooarolllOrlri~~~OOQ
h~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I rl ri..-l
~OOOOOOOOOOM~OOOOD..-llllOOOOOOOOOOOO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~,i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
""
,,1
~ooooooaONOW&O/ll~rlOOOOOO~OOOO~OO
ruoooooOOOOO~~~riOOOOOOOOrlOOOO~OO
~ . . . . . , . . . , . g' . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . .
!.I
,
~OOOOW/llOOOOOOO_OOODOONOOMrlOOOOOM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO~oooooooaWrlOOO
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlOOOO
~ . . . I , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~OOOOOOOMN..-lOOO~~OOOOOOOOOrlOOOOrlO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~
Mrl~M~lllw~ro~OrlNM~~W~wmOrlNM~m~~~~Orl
~ ~rlrlrlrlrlririrlrlMNNNNNNNNN~~
~I:'-oro
r--rlOrl
... ~
O',-Q'OM
ro......ON
'" "
ChcnOItl
('>lClO\l)
... ...
ricoot""
~,...'Or<l
... "'
....1 lfl q-.;jl
MrlO\O
d ~
I""l<TlOl(l
ooNOO\
'" 00
<l't'-0,-1
l'lNON
'" m
N"iIlor-l
":~c:~
'" ~
N....ao
l")rlOrl
'" ~
....oot--
tflrlOO\
'" '"
\,1)"0.....
1""1001'1I
NNOt'o
~~~~
~i~~
~
,.,
"
H
~
\r\
\\
~
~
~
H
,,,
H
i'J
H
"'
""
~i'i
jjJtjj
€Jfl
"'>:
-
-
~B~
Iii
tJH
~5 g~~
[SH 0
~ ~~~
f;l~1il ,,, ,.
~~fj~~~
~ ~~~i'i~~
~ ~~~~fa8~
~ u~~n~
~
J:l DlWf-d>Kl>i1Sl
~
" 1'1 I I
I
@
::!
~
!;;
Q ~ i<
"'!Il '"
~ g ~
~ g ~~
",~~~~J ~~
i[Sl~il~~~~
~t~~i{l~!il~~
~
~
, I I'" 1 I I 1
V^{1.or:t:fil~;l!;ZIllC!!:l
row'"
",,000
o~
ON_
2aiD
E0J~
(J) .>-......--
.~ m J)
m::::;;cn
""Clem
CI.1.iQ..
ill"
CJl
.-::(
ii'll<
;;
8
..
i~ 8
I~
!ii
on
HUl
11
H
H
n
"'N
Chri
~
.,.
"'~
:.?<'<l'
Od
" m
~
~
~
~~
'"
~~
H
-~~
"''''
Olri
2~
"
1'Ii'i
"''''
'"
~B
i'iiS
~~
L
88
tl
h
~
",'"
~gl
~8
"''''
l:!m
",!'l
""
w
'"
UOOM~OOoooon,'i~~oOOO~rlOOOOOOOOrlOO
Woo~ooOOOOOmOrlDOOOO~Oooooooooaoo
t::I..,...,'.,...,......,.......,. .
>ODOI-.OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO'~OrlOOOOOO
0000 MOOOOOOooooooooo~ooooooooo
Z . ,. ..........,........,......
ri
tgggg~~8gggg8ggggggg~ggggggggggg
o . . . , , .. ..,....,..
M
"
H
III 0 <;:) 0 r-. 0 <t' \D t! Q 10 0 0 r-. i"'1 m rl f.I\ r-- d 0 0 N rll"l 0\ 0 0 0 0
MOOOOONrlnO OOOOi"'1~r-.f.I\~OOOOOMMooon
(f]....... ,. ." .... .,.,....,.....
Mriri
g~8ggg~~~~g~8ggg~~~~g~~~~g?t~~ggg
,q;,. .,.",., .......,..... . ....
.->
8000 f'". 0 0 tfl 0 0 0 mar-. r-. (h 0 00 0 '<l<, I 0 0 a rt)(,. 0 no (h Co
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.4 ..., rl
~OODOODOONNDOooooo~a~oaWO~rlC~~.
oooooaoomoOOOOOOONO~O~MOMNcmHa
. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . , . , . . ,
r>
~~No~oooaaoooooooooooooooao~~ooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~aOO~OOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOoaoooooo~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~NOOOOOOOMOooooooao~.oaooaoaoaoo
mooooOOO~OOOOOOOOON~OOOOOOOOOOO
. ..............................
M
~ON~~OrlOaoOOmOO~WMoomOOmooorlO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
N r>
~OOOOONO~oooooomMOOOOOMmrla~OOOOo
OOOOONONOOOQOOWOOOOOOOrlOOCOOOoo
................... .., ..,.. ,...
00
m
m
r>
~
Hr~NM.mw~ro~OrlN~.~~~m~OMNM~m~~m~Orl
~ rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlNNNNN~N~NNMM
NlJ)Ot'-
, ~~c:::~
N
0'. <$ 0 Lll
ItH'IOa
~ '"
t"-CtI0W
rlOQI.Il
M
MmO<'1
NMOt"-
~ r>
r>
M<J'\OI.D
.....rior--
,-j l.ll
<:j'Lt'loO\
'-0 NO r-
M '"
NU10rl
01.-10"",
M ~
1tl'<l'0.-l
..,.....01"1
~ ~
't'OO'-O
0000
~~O\D
C'lrlOW
rl ~
NO'lCll1
O.....ON
'" '"
ao,q<c;>'-O
IJ)OOf'l)
ri
~i~~
'"
\t\
\\
.~~
Vl [.'J[.!J ~
" i:'ii:'i ~
H
'" ~~
H - -
" ~~
"
[l ~"
rl ~~(J
"
H "UlVl
"
'" l~iI
"
~ 01l
~ HH
~""
~11 gj~
H 0
-q... ~p:p::
" 00
~f"t~ C<l~
H "
0(1,. fjll:lfo:l
Ztloo,,[!l~
~ ~~giS~~
~rU[jO~
:'I O~ HPc
" ~"tli'if'J~~
1'1 ~~~g~8Jg
1'1 1'1 I I "
i'i P:l Ul f-l :'-'I>{>" ~
~
ill
~
[j"' ~
i'l
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ el~ I ~~
~ ~!~~~I~~~~
~ ~~~g~fZ~~~~
~
I I I 1 I I I I 'I
VA"'.:eMH~Z~lBI
CQcoc.o
""DO:>
_.~O..,.....
,,-
o
-:~ (\")
:::'....7
a>>''-
':::::rom
m::lDl
-:Jcm
c: roll.
U>-,
en
<(
f:l
"
'"'"
~~
..."
::18
f!l
~~
!1
13:;:
1i
H
t;
OON
'O~
'"
~
""'
z~
n...
"00
~
..
~
HO
.~~
'"
~~
-e~
"'"
fZ!l
~~
"
~B
~i'1
~~
~8
tJ
h
'"
1j,.'
U '"
'"
'"
>I'" '"
.. n
~ ~
Mgg~gggg~ggg~~~~gggggggggggg~ggg
Q . . . .. .,.....,....,."..,..,.,.
~~~~~W~~~~ooooocoooa~~ooooooaoa
g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Z~~~ M
~ ~~ON~IOOO~~wooooo~oooooooooo
OMoooaacomMooaOOQOOOOOaaaoo
...,...,.,. ...,.. ,.......,.
~~A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0,00
",00
00, .
UOOOOrlmrl~.OM~o~mm~ri~~roO~AOOMO~O~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
d r"1: ,--l
"
,'~
~N~~N'~OOrlOOmA~~.~rlOmOmrla.NQOOOCDO~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dW ~ rl
g ~~~Z~~~~~~X~~~~A~~~~
f1iOcOOOIJ;lON~CO OM
~C:::~~I':~~.C:~ ~~
~oooooooooooooooo~oooooooooooooo
~~~~~~<:~~~c:c::~c:c:~~ .~~~~c::~c:c:c:~~c:~~
~OOOODOOOooooooaomNOOOC~Nooewwo
~~c::~~c::~~c::~~c::c::~c:~~~~~~c::~~~~~~~~~
~OD~Oooooooaoo~~oooooooaoooooooo
~~~~c::c::~c::c::~~c:~c::~c::~~c::c::c::~c::~c::~~~c::~c::~
eOOO~dOO~~oOoaoaaQOOOriOOOOOOrl
~~~~c:c::c::c::c::~c:c::~c::c:c:c::c:~~c::c::c::c::c:~~c::c::
~gg~~gg8g~~ggggggg8gg8g~~ggggggg
t:l...................,.......,.. .
~riN~~~W~W~OriNM~~~~~~OrlNM~~W~W~Orl
a ~rl~~rlrlrl~rlrlNNNNNNNNNN~~
\ONOIl)
MOOUl
"'
'<t'dOlll
riOOri
" "
Il;I\J)Ocn
ll'100m
...
"' "
0000
0000
NOCa)
"4\ lTJ OM
N m
,1&\00)
(01")00
N N
...
" "
tnNOIll
U>'<l'QO
... '"
NOON
rlOOr-i
\ON 01"-
NeelD
\DPlot-
wao<(J
ONOlfl
f'lOO~
rl~OIO
~c::c::"':
'"
~
~
~I~~ ~
~
~
H
"
'"
H
"
~~
""
00
Z,,;:
~
I>:
~
H
"
I
~
rS
~
~55
Iii
HH
~s ~~~
"' 0
" 1';"''''
~('i~ :;:~
o;H fi
OJ:), ti:l~
~HU OOE--l
~nl1~"~
~ u 0
r.. Q III
go f:l:l!QH Pol
f:1",!:J~~~~
~~e~i'1~~
'"
I I , I I r I
~1JlE-<>K:>Jt:"'l
[;l
8
r:!
S
~! :
tl 0 '"
r.l '" :'!j"
~ B ~~
~ ~:'!l[;l ~ ~I
i~~~U~aa~
~l\l~gju1.1h!lii:
= 1_:dli&<I'ilH~ZtQ
r I I I I I I r f I
V^r..F:(lQH;.:c::Z;Pilm
\\
~~
'.
-
-
-
moo'"
00000
O~
ON.........
-7 _ 0
-0)
~N:g:
.~ >...-
ro Q.l
ro:lD'>
"S2cro
_COD-
m -,
""
<(
"
H
..
~~
n
~B
!;l
~~
~
00
[~ U;
Z
n
H
~
"
mN
",H
"'
.'
Din
Z .'
OH
rim
~
'"
~
f<0
:'l~
~
~~
f<
-a~
"'~
""
.."
a~
"".
"
lSB
h
e~
i~
uu
'"
(J
h
i'i:'
U 0
0
0
N
u;
t ;~ e
i!l
'H'
Uooooooooo~~ooooooo~oooooooo~ooo
~OoooooaOOMrlOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlOOO
Q .. ...."......,..,..,......'.
>OOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOONOoOONOOOOO
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tgZ~~8gggggggggggggggggggggggggg
o . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . , . , , .. .........
~OOOmWOIf1...00roo~~~'ro~~ooooommooo
~OOO~N.~~~W~OMO~O o~~oooooo.ooo
l}) ......,..,. ,." '0. .. ,. .,..,...,
...-! QI rl
0~~U~.roooooOOOOOQONONmmO~NOOOOMmw
p 0,-1 Pl'~ Oltl] 0 00 000 '\I' 0 0'00 0 \.Ud roM 0 0 rl 0 0000 f"\l 0
r'l: . .".........., ,...,
d...-!
n,\i';;<: R,Z;?' ~
1~~.~moMOonorlOODaNmo Ooo.~owoo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OOOOrlo~rl
dd
!~MrlOOOO~OON~OOOOOOooooo~~mM~OO
~ '<I: ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ C; c~<; '=: ~ ~.-; ~.-: ~ ~ C; ~c: ~ ~ ~ 'r;~ ~ c:
H H
~OO~NOON~OOOOO~OMOOOOOOOOOO~OOO~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~c:~~C;~C;~~~C;~~C;C;~~~~c:
~OOO~OOOOOOOOO~~~OOoooooooooaoo
~~~~c:C;~~C;c:~c:c:~~~~C;~~~~c:~~~~C;~~~
H
6
~ooooo~ooooomaOOOOJ'~oooooaa~~ooo
00000000000000000 oaoaOOOOrlMOOO
..............,.. .............
H
8DOOOOO~OOOOOOMOOOOOOOOOO~OOOO
00000000000000000000000000000
. ,.......................,...
~OOMMOOOrlOMMOOMOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOO
~c:~~~~~c:~c:~~~~~c:~C;~c:~~C;C;~~~~C;C;~C;
~rlN~~~~~~mOrlMM~~~~~mOrlN~~~W~~~Orl
~ rlMMrlrlrlrlrlrlrlNNNNNNNNNNM~
t--NOO
rlODlll
N 00<:1'
0000
rlfi}ON
-.:lOCI OlD
!'-\DON
\!l<'1001
N 0
d
C\1MO~
rof'lOO
rl t..
\O~o12
lllrlOW
H .
III N 0,...,.
'<l'NOltl
H ~
O'lr"-ON
<hOON
'"
0'l1ll0..-!
r-IOOItl
H H
fflMO<:l'
Mr-fOl1l
'" M
IflQoon
0000
Olt'tCI.Q
en 00'"
...
~~~~
>:
,. ~~
~
H
~ ,,'"
H "'"
0 ""
00
f< ~2
6 . "g
H ~[J'
[,<
H I~~
1!
H
en
00
'" HH
~s ~~~
H 0
-l~ ~~g
~(....~ !:<l.
H[t1(-.l
~~~~~~
~ Ugi'101.,
r<I ~:H;t'lf;l~~
..i'1~,,!J;'l:l
~ tilt!J. Ad>
~H~ 08
f3 !'li'1g;z
t'I I I 1 I I f I
:'i ~UlE-t-~X~t"'1
~
~
~
~
iii iii
l'l
I ~ J
r,l 8 n
~ ~~~ i U
i~~~d1~~1
~~h~&l~~f:l..
I I j. I r I 1
\'-\
\\
~
~
~
~
v ^{\oI'llOOH~l2:0.d81
ClJCO<<>
00000
-'-C> ~
~-
o
.OJ LO
::("J-q-
(!) >>.........
.:!::::rnm
ro::lV>
-g c: rn
_roo..
a>-c>
Ol
<(
"
H
"'",
h
~8
~~
~
00
'"~
1J
H
t1
~~
"'
~
,,~
Zoo:<
Od
1-1 eo
~
~
<-
,"0
~~
~
~~
'"
~~ ~
0:1",
"ld
2r3
'"
M
"''''
"l
~a
~~
E~
~~
"S
tJ
h
~
.
Ii'
'"
'"
~i;1
F1:g
&1S
"'~
gj~
~E
UOOONOO~~OQ~OOOQOOOOooooo~nOOMOO
~OOOrlOOMDOOoooooooooooooo~ooooo~
Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . .
>OOO~NOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0000000000000000000000000000000
~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . ,
~O~OOOOOOOOOOO~nOoomO~~OOOMOOOOO
Uooooooooooooo~~oono~~oooDNOOOOO
o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .
n
',.'
" "'I"
OrlM~OlnON~Q~O~wonoo~ooo~~OM~ 0
a~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i ~
d rl~1 Wrl .-liJ
g~~~g~~gggg~~8ggg~~~~8gg~gggg~*g
~ 'B . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . .
~laNMMOrlOO~N~MoooooOmOW~~rl~PlrlrorlOm
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~
rl JI~rl
~~OONO~~OOOOOOO~~N~rimON~rlO~OO~~
5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
M rl .........
~arlN~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~QONarlOMOOOOOOoooooooaooaooooo~
oooowo~oooooocoooooooooooooooo
...... ,..,........,.,....,.,..
~OOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOM~MOOOOOOOOO~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
d rl
~OOOOOOOOOOMrlOOOOOaoooaoooooo
OOOOOOOOOO....OOOOOOOOrlOOOOOOOO
,.........,.....,......,... .
~OONrlOOOO~OOOOOOOoom~o~ooooooaoa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
d
o
o
N
~
~rlNM~~~~wmOrlNM~~~~wmOrlNM~~~~mmOrl
~ ....rl~rlrlrlrlrlMrlNNNNNNNN~NMM
OIllOIoD
t"-OO\D
rl
waoo
ooad
1"-0'10111
....1 0 Of"'o
d N
ClI11'10N
cwam
w ,.
N
Oo:f'Or!
,... NOM
<'l 1-'
lJIr--o~
"""oot!
M ~
d
11'1 rlO I"
IDf'jOM
rl ~
'<I'OOrl
OOOrl
.-lIt'lOot'
~~c:""':
rl
'<tNQIt'I
l"1rlOItl
d ~
M....cO""
.-lOON
r--r'lOM
MCOQ)
~I~~
~
'"
~
'"
~
E'i
i'l
"'''
i:li:1
oltl
~~
~~~
~"'UJ
~U
HH
~~ ~~~
[i!H 0
~"' ~ ~~:s
:ilf:;~ ....
~et1h~
n~~~",
~~~~Iil~~
f;:1'i",~I;l~~
"'''''''05
~~~g~d
'"
'"
H
<')
,;
"
'"
6
H
'"
H
l'i
H
'"
"'
I r r 1'1 I
~tJ)["'>K>ll~
~
gj
~
,,;;; ~
.. '" ~
I ~ ~~
~ g ~~
8 ~ m~8 ~ ~~
~ ~!~;~I~~~~
~ 0~~1l!~,"~~"'~
~~erl:ir3l~H~~U)
~
1 I I I I I I r f I
v hc"J:llll::l...=lxzndBl
~
\\
-
%
~
OJ "')<"
GOO'"'
.o~
ON_
Z .0
E~~
GJ >-~
=:(aQ)
(tj:::::!0)
"g ~ct::
GJ,
'"
<(
Q
H
"
~~
mg
f;,l
~8
~
~~
~
00
I-<~
1i
H
r<
U
,. "
"'e'
~
~
"''''
....""
0'"
" m
,..
..
~
~~
~
~~
I-<
-:;1:.':
"m
"''''
g;j
(,
~j!j
"''''
"'e
~i'l
~~
!~
tJ
h
, "',
~@ N
~8 0
0
"
~
~~ ~
. e!:;:
ll'
'" ~8
UOoooo~oo~moo~OOOOoo~oooomoooooo
MoooOOOOO~MOO~OOOOOOMOOOO~oooooo
A .. ,..,.....,'.,. . , . . . . . . . . ,
~OOOOO~OOOOOOOOO~HOOOOOOOOOOOOO
g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~OOOOOOoooo~mOOOOriOOOOOOOO~OOOO
~COOOOOOOOOONMOOOOooonoonooooooo
o . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , , . . , , , . . ,
010 U)Cl 000 0 0 0 0 r-......o rl 1'10'1 OO.-i d </1 0 "l'f"lll'l ",,\,or-- LOd
Noooooooooo~~orlm~oooNOONOONrlOriO
~ . .. ..., . . , . . . . .
0000000~OONOrlO~omrlLOC~UlnnQ~INOMmMNO
POOOOOOrlOOOOOOLOO,-IMMONOrlOOODU)OClMM
i:(, "...... ""'" ......,...,.".
.-I ,j
~mOOOOrl~r1MWO'lOOOOom~OOOO~~NmOrlmOO
t; c:: c: ~ ~ c: ~ !:~ ~ ~ It; c: c; ~ c: ~ ~ ,.~ ~ ~ ': ~ c.; ~ ~ t.: a: c: <; ~ ~ ~
<'i
" ,.'
.MOOOOOO~OOOOOO~~rl~NO~~D~OOrlNOOO
~OOOOOOOMOOOOOOM~ooomo~O~OO~M~~
. . . . , , . , . , . , . .~ ' . . . . . , '~ ' . .,..;,...i ,
ttlD'lIJ'lMI'IlM
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~~~c.;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MIilf>!l 2}
~OOOOOOOOOM~mOJo~moonoooooooooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~c.; ~~c.;c.;~~~~~~~~~~~~
"
~oooooorooooooooooooooooomNOOOO~O
0000000000000000000000000000000
............, -...,.,....,..,...
.,,,,,
m nOOOOOOOOOOONOOOOOrlOOOooo
~ oooooooooOOO~OOOOOOMOOOOO
I'< ......,....., ..,....,....
lld;;':i~~:::Zl2il2lZ
ZO~OOOrlOOOOOOom~oooooooo
~OMOOO~OOOOOOOM~OOOooooo
~ . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . , , . .
....
~rlNM.m~~m~orINM~~~~OOmOrl"M~m~~m~Orl
~ rlrlrlMrlrlrlrlrlrlNNNNNNNNNNMM
~IDOl'-
\Doom
.-1fY10~
lfIantO
I/H'\IOO\
MOOlfJ
t-- ....0'<1'
1"'..-10'"
[-;-'010
lfI..-10~
~ m
<4 N 0 ll\
NNOU>
N '"
U\U\O(f)
01(')00;1
'" ...
...
rlOOrl
aono
tl'H"OIn
~r'!~~
~ m
10..-10<<1
DOOrl
" "
<"lll!c;>~
O'lO<=lN
...
ce~o~
lSl~~c;
... N
~~~~
'~
\\
,~,
'~
~
e'
~
"'
~
~
H
Q
,'"
f'if'i
U
"'>l
~
H
'~
~
,-,
"'
I
"
~
0BB
~;~
~OC!
,~ H
~6 ~~~
l-.~ ~~~
"'1E-4t:l rT, tTl
"'H"~
OQ"E-t I'tlUl
:'<:HtJ Cf.IH
U~""r'i
~ihi'i~g;
~ u "0
...ta. QO~
~O~~HPi
,",,[j~~~~
1'J~~Q"lil!J
~OE-<....HOI i?;
'"
s
"
I I I I I j I
fl'ltlll',.d> ~~f'.:l
~
:'J
~
~
~
i:l
~
~
I! ~
:: ~i
~~li~J b
~!5I~~~!;~~~E~
1:1", '" ~'" i:!
0", 1'l tI"'!i:>l
~~ Qt~pr:JH~~~
I I 1 I I I I'
V^(\.o.(l"ilH~Z~e
(l]CO<D
~~
l~
o
",....
i::N~
(I) >-~
.......row
mOl'"
-oern
:::roCL
(1)-0
""
.~
"
H
~~
B@
:;]8
g:
~::.l
fl
00
'" '0
6
H
(;
"''''
"'H
'"
..
",,"
g~
,-
"
~
~~
~
~~
"
-a~
"'H
fi:~
ai1i
'"'"
'"
1l~
~11
~~
L
88
1)
h
"~,
a""
~3 M
ea "
0
'"
~
~ ~~ ~
'" ""
UOOOOOOOOO~OOO~OWNOOOOOoooooooOO
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOrlO~~OOOooooooooooo
Cl' ...........rl..........,..,...
~onOO~-.Momoooo~ooooo~ooooooooooo
0000 ~oooooooooooooooooooooooo
I\l... 'i\!' ,.......,... ............
/,j.'
'"
~MooooooooOOOOOOrlooooooooooooooo
Uooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o . , . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , ,
~z~~~~~~s~ ~~~~
~OO~OrIOOOOOOOOrla WO ~o MW~OM~O
ffl~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~ ma ~~ ~~:~~i~
"
o N <>) (f) 00 0 0 1.D\J;ll,DO f'ld N <I) U!'N 0 oJ lJ1r~ Q)Ol.O'<I'0ol.-l1.D 1.0 0) f'1
~ ~ r;'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ U; ~~ ~~ ~ ~ t~j c:: ~ N. C:~ r~~~~.-!c:: ~~ r: ~
.-1 t1
rt1111 rilr::lt>.l
~OOO~N~O~O'<l'~rl~rlOOOO~OO.NO.Wf'1~WOM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
d rl
., ""
~OOMO~~OOrloowm~~OOOrl~i'.rl~~m~rlo~moo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~
ri rl r-i m..-l
;: tv
MOoooooomoooOO~OOmr-irlooomrlOO~~~Oo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
-,
~OOOOOOOO=QOOOO~OOO~rloooool~r-iOON
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
...
Pl::-:.::;:~Pi p..1lf
~oooooaoo Oooo~oooooo~moaQOO~O
~OOOOOOOO oooo~~oooooooooooooo
..,..,.. '..'.,.4'..'....'.....
~ooooooooooocnQOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0000000000000000000000000000
.......,....,.......,....,. .
~OOrlOOOOOOooooooooooooomooooooOo
o~ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
".. ..................,........
~rl~M~~~~ro~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"
ror--OO'l
.-1000
... N
.-100(1\
...-1.-1001
N '"
'"
.-lOON!
onoo
" ~
lDt"'-OtO
,...Jr<10\'o
'" m
NMO"<lt
r-1~Orl
Pi ~-
r-mOri
lrIdOU
.< ~
~mOf\l
O)'"<J!OUl
'" '"
...
....NOT-
Il'!r;~r-:
... '"
~::lg&l
N M
o~o~
"",,00\0
... N
0000
0000
01'100
r--ooo.)
~~~~
.J)
\\
'"
~
~
~
~
~
~~
n
" "'..
~55
Iii
~ HH
~l'"
'Jo flf'lf'l
m: 0
H;;C ~~~
~~s rll~
o"'t::~....
iii:I-lU trlE-;
U~ Dei
~m~i:l~~
hf3~&l~~
~ffi~~~~:
~~~~ag:g
1'i
H
"
H
"
~
H
ro
H
~
H
~
I j I I J I I
Qlror:.q> :4~~
I
~
f'l
~
tl
~ ii' io:C
~ {g n.
B f< ~
i:l g ..
o :"II
a 8 ~
~ ~:'I~,,& ~u
~!dll~~~~
~~~~..d~~~
~
~
I I I I I I I I I I
V ^ [h r.( I'il H;:!; lzi Alll3l
alOClUO
OOQOCl
D~
ON_
Z .0
Q')
E(,-J~
1J;>''''-
=ro<u
CU::JO)
-oem
croo...
3),
CJ)
c(
~
00
'"' '"
15
H
[.,
[,>
"N
rJJd
~
"
" '"
""
Stri
r-
"
r-
,",0
~~
r-
g:;
>ON
'"'
-:<!~
t;~
0"
o."
"
!Hi
"''''
~~
1HI
~~
!~
tJ
h
'"
.
il'
'"
""
~>l
S~
ti8
,"",
el:;;
~B
u~~~~~~~Z~~ooooooooooaOrlrl~OOOO~rl
~ OrlOOOoooOOOOOOONMOOOOO~
f-l .. .........., """
~
..
~OOOO~Oooooooaooaooooooooooaooo
QOOOOrlooaoooOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOO
Z . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ......"...,...
~~gg8gg~ggg~8gg~ggggg~gggggggggg
o . . . , . . .. .. . . . . . . , . . . , , . . ,
H
"
H
,.
u
'"' .,
~8
~roooa'~~~ONoaaOrlooooOOm~oooooooo
N~IOOO~~OOooooooooooocoaoooooooo
U} ,...., ., """
~
..
~
"
~~
~O,~OO~ODMQOooroOODOOrlO~~O~noooooo
p, I 'OflM rirl 0 0 riD 000 0 C 0 eo 0 00 ,'1<'1 r'lO<fll" DC> 0 0 0 0
~ . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
rl~,'1 N ._~.~
~NDNOrlOaOO~rloooaoo~mgrl~OOrl~mm~rIO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~
rf!i r'f
,'01 ,,'
mOONNOrl~NroOOOrl~~WOmOCNooom~momo
oomooo~~rlOOO.OrlNOOOOOOOOrlN.-IO.N
.............., ..".,...,.....
rlrl ,..j
~OO~OOOrlOrl~"OOrlrl~N~~NMMmoooooooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~OOOOCOOO~MMWmOO~rl~o.o..~mOOONW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
n
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlrlOOOOOOOONOOOOOO
0000000000000000000000000000000
....... .....................,..
~~rlooo~nooooooomoooooOOOOOONOO
OOOOOOOooooooo~OOOOOOOOOOrlOOO
....... .....,...., ...........
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~rlOOOOOOW~OO~~
8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,.1 rl
"
C
C
...
e
MrlN~~~~~~mOrlNM.~w~~~arlNM~mW~oo~o~
~ rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlN~NNNNNNNNMM
"
~~~rii
r;~~t-;
"' n
'<1'.-10.
.-100.-1
rl'f'O!"-
..-lOOM
M M
Q)r-lO.-/
0,...10 N
M '"
WIflOl1l
01'10<:0
t\I ,:::,
,
IDOOW
r-.I'lOd
r'>l ""
O\t"JOlfl
<t'NOl1\
M ~
ll"to:t'Ol11
o:t'OOfll
M
{\jOOM
NrlOrl
M M
['<l00,</,
0000
f'tMOIl'J
UlOer--
Uleooof
IfIr-lO.-l
~ '"
~~~e
~
"'
"
~~
f;jf;j
~~
~BB
I~~
:aOO
HH
~""
~~[j D:;Jgj
H 0
-'H :;;~~
a; ~OO
r>lH~ r...""
~H ~
001: Iill'.:/l
;:::H f!:!E-t
UM >-'a
i1l~h~"
Q tJ ZO
"H" 00,,"
l'l"O~~HO.
,"1'l",~13I'l~
rilt!lUQtj>
S~!50":'.l~
POPZHn..Z
'"
f:1
"
H
o
~
H
~
~
H
'"
"'
~
f'i
i'l
r t, 'I' ,
e::t1)H~ ~>l t-:I
..
~
H ~
g '"
o ::g&j
~ e ~fj
~ ~ ei~ i n
::g ~~~~~;'1'~~1
~ ~~~~~~~~~
II ..:lii!O"Oll~):Z
~
"
I
~
, ,
I I 1'1 I I I
VA....I<:(I1IH::E:Zu,18l
N
\\
"""'::I-
%
\.\
~
~
a
~
mco",
0000:)
...;;...o~
,-
_ 0
.J en
'"",
2 >-~
row
(O:::lO)
-~ ~~
([>~
Vl
,0;
"
H
"
..'"
~~
H~
:;!u
~
~~
m
~~
1l
H
'"
lj",
'" M
~
~
IJ}lfl
z~
S~
,-
"'
,..
~~
,..
~~
[~
-~:l:
....
"'rl
C..
"'''
h
'"
l'1B
h
E~
is
uu
tJ
h
""'I
n '"
0
0
0 "
H
~ B~ ~
'" i'l8
UOOOOON~OOOOOOOOOOOMooaoc~oooooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>~OOOOOOOOOOOMOOOOONo~ooooaOMO~
o~oooooooooooooooonOO~OOOOOOOMO
:z;.,........, ..............,..rl.
8mMOOn~OO~Nm~~ONOOOONrl~O~~OOOOOOO
QMOOMrlM~ooorl~oOOOOOrlOrlOM~OOOOOoo
o . . . . . '" . . . '!r . . . , . . . . . . .~ . . . . . , .
" .,
~m~mor.OrloOoOOOOQO~OOomN~O.~~Dom.
~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"OOONnOo~m
[JJ,.....,......,......,... ".,..
,~
M
~rlOOOM~~OOOOOOrlrl~OWOrlOM~~rlrlOOMOOO
~oooooOOOOOOrlOO~OrlONrloo.I.,~o~Moooo
.... .... ............. ..... ......,
r'
~l~oonOO~~M~rl~~~mmOOMMmrlO~OOrl~UrlO
OOOOOO~OrlOrlMO~OmOO~NOOOOOOOOOOO
.. ""'" ......... ...., <.......
",rl
~ 0 . ~
SI'-Hj.'~gg8~~~i"~g~ggggg~~~~~g~~~~~
i; !t ..... '9' ...................
f rl ~ 04 .-l rl rl
~O~MNOOOOOQONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC~
2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~O~OOOOONQOOONOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOO
OMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOO
................. .'...........
rl
"
m
~oo~~co~roOMOCOOOOlroOOOO~~OOOMOOO
E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
rl rl
~oooooeooooooooocoooooooomM~O
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ZOOOOOOOOOOOOO~rlOOOOMOOOOOOOQOOO
~OOOOOOOoooooo~ooooooooooooooooo
tj.....,............... ..,.......
~rlMM~~W~OO~OrlN~~~~~ro~OrlNM~m~~OO~Orl
a rlrlrlrl..-frlr-lMrlrlMNNNNNNNNNMM
OriCD
rlOo~
I... .
oweo
..-100""
M "
O\rlOIO
\O'<I'ot-
~ '"
"
OOI/)O~
rl..-lOM
rl .,
('-1/)00
ro.-fO~
,...j <1'
"'01 or--
0010-r--
'" ~
ll'l\DO~
000.0<0
., '"
'"
..,.\OON
mOO[lJ
O\DoLll
ClOOOO
rl rl
\.PdOt-
':~~"'!
'" ~
lXIMO\.O
~~~~
"'l"lOo.o
<'1\000\
~~~~
M
(t--
I
H
u
g'"
",!i!
:<BB
Q"''''
~u
HH
~B ~~~
H 0
'!;j ;\]iHl
~11~ "'..
O~ tJl"il."
).:H f21(J)~
~~~~~re
~ u Eo
>:1"'.."0'"
;aD ~HilI
~~~~a~:
~Of<li:11S:ll
\,
'^
o
~
l'1
H
'"
H
'"
~
H
i:1
i3
H
'"
'"
~
~
I 1" I I I
O:lUlt-;:>~l>H~
;
~
@
ill
~
[~
[;l ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ g ~;
:!mIM!
~~n~~hg~
..
~
I I I I I I I I I I
VA""~~H~Zp.,~
OlCO<.O
coO'"'
O~
ON........
Z .0
"'0
EN IS)
G.l >-..-
=(r;m
CO :::l Ql
-oem
c:roD.
Qj-,
:J)
<(
!~ Jt:
~+
ffl8
"'"
~B
ill
~~
i'J
.<
DO
,~ ~
11
d
c..
"
,,~
r/ld
>0
~
",>0
,.~
0....
._100
~
.,
~
" 0
:l~
~
gg
"N
&l",
-,,"'
"'"
"....
g'l'l
"
~Hi
"""
",gj
n
~~
L
B8
S
~~
...
...
~
~
..
..
l'l~'
~
"
"'"
~~
d
UOO~rlOOnOOOOOO~rlMnOOOOOrlOWNOOOOO
~ooooooooooooooo~oooooooowoooooo
Q . . , . . , . . , . . . . . . " ,.".,.... ..
>O~OOOO~OOOOOOOO~OOOrlOOOOOOOON~
ooooooo~OOOOOOOOrloooooooooooooo
Z ' , . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
800000000000~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlOOO
Uoooooon~oonoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlOOO
o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . , . . , . . .
.,
Q
H
~~Aro~mrlaO~NWOOOrlrlrlrlONNO~aOOOlnoOO
~OOW~rlOOONOr.l~onOOOD~rlONOOOo~ooo
[t). .... ...... ..,...,..".,
"
ggggg~~~~~gggg~~~g~w~~g8g~~3~~~g
~"""""""""ry""""" .
M rl ;:1 d
.
~NWrlOOm~~Q~'-loroNoo~aOO~rl~QWN~WOOO
O~~OONNOOrl~OOrlOO~OM~Orl~OM~~~ooo
').............. , .... ."., . ...... .
,..-1 rl d
~~OOOOOOOD~mO~ODn~~DlnOQO~M~OOO~
OODOOOOOooo.rlOOOOO~Doooo,INooooro
..,..,...,.........,.,....,.. .
d rl rl
~OOOOOOOO~OO~OOO.OOOOOOOOI:.ooo~'om
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~~~~
d
~OOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~ooooOOOOOODOOOOOOooooooooooooo
R:....... ....,....,.............
~oooooooooooooooooooOOO~OOOOOOOO
0000000000000000000000000000000
. ...............'..............
i'
~oo .oooooaO~rlOOOOOOOOOOOOOrlao
~oo ~oooooooooooooooooooooooo
Ill<.. ..........,..,...........
t..,
~ooaoa~OOOOOOrlrloooooaooooooooooo
oaoooQOOOOOOOOOoorloooaooooooooo
..,................ .......,....
'"
o
o
'"
~
~rlN~~~~~~~OMNM~~~~~~OrlNM~~~~~~O~
~ rl~M~rlrlrlrlrlrlNNNNM~~~NN~~
Yl '<#I 0''''
\0000
',.. ,
r'
1l1l"'IOo;!'
~OClr--
,-l<t'ol'-
.-lOOrl
'"
rlt'-OI.D
lfldO,...1
.. >0
<'"l rXI 0 1-
(Y'>!"'lO<D
I'> m
drl<:l[1)
~ ~~ r~
rl 0'
l"-('.IOUl
<.(I('.IO!O
d '"
,,"00'<1'
001'101'1
M '"
0000
0000
r--OOI"-
0000
NLl'lO\D
NrlOrl
M '"
;
~
~~~~ ~
Oriol'-
.....OOM
.r
~
~
t>,
~
1'1
rE
~~
0112
~~
~BB
Iii
HH
;;>""'
~E5 r1~~
~H "
ro~ j]~~
m f:: ~ '" '0
O~' III ~
>:H ~UlI1
ur~f21D~
n~i"i;J",
&l u Eo
r:i~l'l..Sg~
..i"i",:;;gi'l~
M~U~tl>H
~g~r;:i"i~ll
"
"
H
D
H
~
,.,
~
H
~
H
Z
"
H
"
'"
I! I I , I 1
~ fil E-<:> ><: >ft'l
s
~
~
;;;
f!l
"
g
'"
"
I I 1'1 I I I
V h!'. ~fil H:.'!: i2lP-lQ;3
'^
\\
t
r~
f1
t';",
~~
,,S
:'18
rn
~:G
~
00
f-.k/'l
"
o
H
t~
"N
'" ....
~
~
"'~
z~
0....
Hm
,..
~
,..
[,0
:S~
,..
ffi~
-~~
.""
"'....
fl~
"
~~
~~
~~
~8
t;
h
,,"',
0>
HS
~o
~ UlU
Gl ~~
l ~g
u~~~Z~X~~~~Z~~XZ~~~~~~~~~~T.~Z~~~ ~~~Z
'"
Q
~~~~~~~z~~~~~z~~z~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
@
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~zz~z~~~~~~~~~ A~~~
U
"
~~~S~~~~~~~~~~~Z~~~2.~~~~ZZ~~~~
'"
gj
~~A~~~~~~~~~Z~~~~A~A~~~~~ZS~?Z~
~
~ ~~~~~~~
~o~oo~~OO~looaooN~o~WO~w~~
~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~~r~~o~
.M~oOomCrlOOOOOONOMOOONooo~~m~~D
~rlNOOO_OrlOOOOOO~o~oooooooooo~oo
rl..,.............,..,.... 'c-r'"
~OOOOOOOOOOOOO~mrloooooOOOOOO~OOO
~OOOOOOOOOOOOamM~OOOOooooooaaoao
.........,.. ,..,...........,......
rl
~OOOOOrlOOOrlWMmO~Ooooo~ooOoOOOOrl
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOQarlOOOOOOOOO
0000000000000000000000000000000
...... ,.............,..........
~OOOO~WOOOO~~OO~NO~OOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOCMOOOOOO~OC~OOMOOOOOOoooo
Ikt..'.."...."...,..,....". .
~OONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMOOMOOO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
o
c
...
~
~MN~~~~~W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q
;i!:)!:~:l!:
:ii.:~:E~
<. ~
Noall}
I" Mom
... ~
MU'lO<T1
a.-loID
... ~
NOlOU1
mOO\l)
rl ...
\Ot-O.-l
r--ooo
...
mooCfl
0000
l"-LOOrl
oof'OO....
rl
Mr-lO\O
~~~~
~~u
'"
'"
H
'"
H
"
~
K
"
li
I'l
K
00
~
~
~
~
~~~
~~~
~oo
~ HH
n ;~~
~r:'i" f;1f':
O~~Mr>1~
~ti~kS~
~1il81'i~~
~ei'J"f,J~8i
~s~~~~:
P~~f2H:jre~
I r I I r I I
P'.!J:lE-t;:.~>t~
I
I ~
l.1 ~
~ mi~~~ U
~!~~i~~e~~
~d8~~h~~
~
fi
I I I I lit 1'1
-. v ^l'o~MH::el=:;a.
~~
).'1 I"!
Ul'"
1lB
:;;:e:
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 151 of 186
...-
'"
\\
\
I
,
i
1
,
,
[
I
~
~
~
[<
~
~
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr
Agenda Item No. 8B
,January 29. 2008
Page 152 of 186
-- ----.--------."'.----~-.-.-'1-
Page 1
Project Name: New Hope
Revi ewer:
Project Number:
Period Begin: Jan 011 2000;0000 hr End: Jan 16, :2000iOaOO hr Duration: 360 hr
Time Step: 0.2 hr, Iterations: 10
Basin 1: Main
Method: Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph
Rainfall Distribution: SFWMD - 24 hr
Design Frequency: 3 year
1 Day Rainfall: 2.1 inches
Area: 38.06 acres
Ground Storage: 3.12 inches
Time of Concentration: 0.167 hmlrs
Initial stage: 9.5 ft NGVD
Stage
(ft I;GVD)
9.50
10.00
10.50
10.5R
J_l.00
11,50
12.00
12.50
13.00
13 .50
14.00
Storage
(acre-ft)
0.00
1 12
/..41
3.1B
7.29
14.63
26.85
12.51
59.43
'/6.97
95.13
Offsice Receiving Body: Offsitel
Time
(hr)
0.00
360.00
Structure: 1
'Stage
(ft I;GVD)
9.50
9.50
From Basin: Main
To Basin: Offeitel
Structure Type: Gravity
Weir: None
Bleeder: Circularl Invert Elev = 9.5 ft NGVD,
Default Coefs: Weir Coef Q 0.6, Orifice Coef
Pipe: Diameter = 1.25 ft, Manning's n . 0.013,
US Invert Elev ~ 9.5 ft NG\~, OS Invert Elev
Time
(hr)
Cumulative
Rainfall
{in}
Instant
Runoff
(cis)
Current
Discharge
Icfs)
Diameter = 0.5 ft
= 0.6
Lsngth = 900 ft
~ 7.5 ft NGVD, no
Cumulative
Discharge
(acre-ft)
flap gate
Head Water
Stage
1ft NGVD)
Tail Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
~~=======~=================A__.~..C~=========================~========.ftmD=.D==
0.00
1. 00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.13
0.17
0.23
0.29
0.36
0.45
0.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00'
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9,50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 153 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 2
Cumulative Instant Current CUmulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall.. Runoff Discharge Discharge stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cfa) (cfa) (acre-ft) (ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
~~~==~==M==~~~ma_.~==~=_~==~===========cc===========================~==========
12.00 1.38 13.55 0.03 0.00 9.61 9.50
1.3.00 1.61 2.69 0.21 0.01 9.81 9.50
14.00 1. 72 1. 68 0.29 0.04 9.87 9.50
15,00 1. 7B 1.14 0.34 0.06 9.91 9.50
16.00 1. B5 1.16 0.38 0.09 9.94 9.50
17.00 1. B9 0,71 0.40 Q.12 9.95 9.50
18.00 1. 92 0.73 0.41 0.16 9.97 9.50
19.00 1.96 0.74 0.43 0.19 9.98 9.50
20.00 2.00 0.75 0.44 0.23 9.99 9.50
21.00 2.02 D,S1 0.45 Q.27 9.99 3.50
22.00 2.05 0.51 0.45 0.3.0 9.99 9.50
23.00 2.07 0.52 0.45 0.34 10.00 9.50
24.00 2.10 0.52 0.45 0.3B 10.00 9.50
25.00 2.10 0.00 0.44 o.n 9.99 9.50
26.00 2.10 0.00 0.42 0.45 9.97 9.50
27,00 2.10 0.00 0.40 0.48 9.96 9.50
28.00 2.10 0,00 0.3B O.Sl 9.94 9.50
29.00 2.10 0.00 0.36 0.55 9.'93 9.50
30.00 2 .1~O 0.00 0.35 0.57 9.91 9.50
31.00 2.10 0.00 0.33 O.GO 9..90 9.50
32.00 2.10 0.00 0.31 0.63 9.89 9.50
33.00 2.10 0.00 0.30 0.65 9.BB 9.50
34.00 ?.10 0.00 0.29 0.68 9.87 9.50
35,OQ 2.10 0.00 0.27 0.70 9.86 9.50
3"6,00 2.10 0.00 0.26 D.72 9.85 9.50
37.00 2.10 0.00 0.25 0.74 9.84 9.50
38.00 2.10 0.00 0.24 O~76 9.83 9.50
39.00 2.10 0.00 D.23 0.78 9.82 9.50
4D.00 2.10 0,00 0.22 0.80 9.81 9.50
41. 00 2.10 O.DD 0.21 0.82 9.81 9.50
42.00 2.10 o.DO 0.20 D,M 9.80 9.50
43.00 2.10 D.OO 0.19 0.85 9.79 9.50
44.00 2.10 0.00 0.18 0.87 9.78 9.50
45.DO 2.10 0.00 0.17 0.88 9.78 9.50
46.00 2.10 0.00 0.17 0.90 9.77 9.5D
47.00 2.10 O.DO 0.16 0.91 9.77 9.50
48.0D 2.10 o.DO 0.15 0.92 9.76 9.50
49.00 2.10 0.00 0.15 0.93 9.75 9.50
50.00 2.~O 0.00 0.14 0.95 '.75 9.50
51.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.14 0.96 9.74 9.50
52.00 2.1D 0.00 0.13 0.97 9.74 9.50
53.00 2.10 0.00 0.13 0.9B 9. '13 9.50
54.00 2.10 0.00 0.12 0.99 9.73 9.50
55.00 2.10 0.00 D.12 1.00 9.72 9.50
5Ei.OO 2.10 0.00 0.11 1.01 9.72 9.50
57.00 2.10 0.00 0.11 1. 02 9.72 9.50
58.'OD 2.10 0.00 0.11 1.03 9.71 9.50
59.00 2.10 0.00 0.10 1. D4 9.71 9.50
6D.DO 2.10 0.00 0.10 1. 04 9.70 9.50
61. 00 2.10 0.00 D.10 1. 05 9.70 9:50
62.DO 2.10 0.00 0.09 1. 06 9.70 9.50
63.00 2.1D 0.00 0.09 1.07 9.69 9.50
64.00 2.10 0.00 0.09 1.08 9.6'9 9.50
65.00 2.10 0.00 0.08 1.08 9.69 9.50
66'.00 2.10 O.DO o.OB 1.0' 9.6B 9.50
67~OO 2.10 D.DO o.OB 1.10 9.6B 9.50
6B.00 2.10 0.00 O.OB 1.10 9.6B 9.50
69.00 2.10 O.DO D.08 1.11 9.68 9.50
70.00 2.10 0.00 0.07 ~.11 9.67 9.50
71.00 2.10 0.00 0.07 1.12 9.67 9.50
72.00 2.10 0.00 0.07 1,13 9.67 9.50
73.00 2.10 0.00 0.07 1.13 9.67 9.50
74.00 2.10 0.00 0.D7 1.14 9.66 9.50
75.00 2.10 0.00 0.06 1.14 9.66 9.50
76.00 2.10 O.DO 0.06 1.15 9.66 9.50
77.00 2.10 0.00 0.06 1.15 9.66 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 154 of 186
Cascade 2001 version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 3
'-~---r .
Cumulative Instant Current CUmulative Head Water Tail Wa.ter
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cia) Ida) (acre-ft) (ft NGVD) 1ft NGVD)
~==========~========~===~~-~==~==========================================~.a_c_
78.00 2.10 0.00 0.06 1.16 9.65 9.50
79.00 2.10 0.00 0.06 1.16 9.65 9.50
BO.OO 2.10 0.00 0.06 1.17 9.65 9.50
B1. 00 2.10 0.00 0.05 1.17 9.65 9.50
82.00 2.10 0.00 0.05 1..1B 9.65 9.50
83.00 2.10 0.00 0.05 1.19 9.64 9.50
B4.DO 2.10 0.00 0.05 1.1B 9.64 9.50
85.00 2.10 0.00 0.05 1.1.9 9.64 9.50
B6.00 2.10 0.00 0.05 1.19 9.64 9.50
87.00 2,10 0.00 0.G5 1.20 9.64 9.50
8B.OO 2.10 0.00 0,05 1. 20 9.64 9.50
89.00 2.10 0.00 0.04 1.20 9.63 9.50
90.00 2.10 0,00 0.04 1. 21 9.63 9.50
91.00 2.10 0.00 0,04 1.21 9.63 9.50
92.00 2.10 0.00 0,04 1.21 9.63 9.50
93.00 2.10 0.00 0.04 1.22 9.63 9.50
94.00 2.10 0.00 0,04 1,22 9.63 9.50
95.00 2.10 0.00 0,04 '1..22 9.62 9.50
96.00 2.10 0.00 0.04 1. 23 9.62 9.50
97.00 2.10 0.00 0.04 1.:n 3.62 9.50
98.00 2.10 O.DO 0.04 1. 23 9.62 9.50
.99.00 2..1.0 0.00 0.04 1. 24 9. (;2 9.50
100.00 2.10 0.00 n.o} 1. 24 9.62 9.50
101.00 2.10 0.00 IJ.03 1. 24 9.62 9.50
102.00 2.10 o. no 0.03 1. 24 9.62 9.50
lO3.00 2.10 a.DO 0.03 1. 25 9.61 9.50
104..00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 25 9.61 9.50
105.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 25 9.61 9.50
106.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 26 9.61 9.50
107.00 2.10 0,00 0.03 1. 26 9.61 9.50
108.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1.26 9.61 9.50
109.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1.26 9.61 9.50
110.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1.2'7 9.61 9.50
111,00 2.10 0.00 0.03 J..27 9.61 9.50
112.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 27 9.60 9.50
113.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 27 9.60 9.50
114.00 2.10 0,00 0.03 1-27 9.60 9.50
115.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1. 28 9.60 9.50
116.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1.28 9.60 9.50
117.00 2.10 0.00 0.03 1.28 9.60 9.50
118.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 28 9.60 9.50
119.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.28 9.60 9.50
120.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.29 9.60 9.50
121.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.29 9.60 9.50
122.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.29 9,59 9.50
123.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.29 9.59 9.50
124.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 29 9.59 9.50
125.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 30 9.59 9.50
126.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.30 9.59 9.50
127.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.30 9.59 9.50
128.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.30 9.59 9.50
129.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 30 9.59 9.50
1.30.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 30 9.59 9.50
131. 00 2.10 0,00 0.02 1. 31. 9,59 9.50
~32.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 31 9.59 9.50
133,00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.31 9.59 9.50
134.00 ?.10 0.00 0.02 1. 31 9.59 9.50
135.00 2.~O 0.00 0.02 1.31 9.58 9.50
136.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 31 9.58 9.50
137.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
138.00 2,10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
139.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
110.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
141.00 2,10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
142.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
143.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1.32 9.58 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 155 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 4
____e
Cumulative Instant Current Cumulative Read Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cfs) (cfs) (acre-H) (ft NGYD) (ft NGVD)
===~======================================Q~=~~===========================.~==~
144.00 2.10 0.00 0,02 1. 33 9.56 9.50
145.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 33 9.56 9.50
146.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 33 9.56 9.50
147.00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 33 9.58 9.50
14 a. 00 2,10 0.00 0.02 1.33 9.5B 9.50
14 9 .00 2.10 0.00 0.02 1. 33 9.58 9.50
150.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.33 9.58 9.50
151. 00 2.10 0.00 0.01. 1.33 9.58 9,50
152.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.34 9.57 9,50
153.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.3~ 9.57 9.50
154.00 2,10 D.OO 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
155.00 2.10 D.OO 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
156.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
157.00 7..10 0.00 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
lsa.oo 2,10 0.00 0.01 1.:l4 9.57 9.50
159.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
160.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.34 9.57 9.50
161.00 2,10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.50
162.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.50
163.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.50
164.00 2,10 0.00 0,01 1.35 9,57 9.50
165.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.50
166.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 35 9.57 9.50
167.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 35 9.57 9.50
168.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 35 9.57 9.50
169.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.50
170.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.35 9.57 9.S0
171 . 00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.57 9.50
1n.00 2.l0 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.57 9.50
173 . 00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
174.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
17S.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
176.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.56 9.50
177.00 .2.10 0.00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
178.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.56 9.50
179.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.56 9.50
160.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 36 9.56 9.50
181. 00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
182.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 37 9.56 9.50
IB3.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
184.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
185.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
186.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
187.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
168.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
189.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
190.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
191.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
192.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
193.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 37 9.56 9.50
194.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56 9.50
195.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.37 9.56" 9.50
196.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
197.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
198.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
199.00 2.10 0,00 0.01 1.36 9.56 9.50
200.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
201. 00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
202.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.56 9.50
203.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9.50
20~.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9~55 9.50
205.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9.50
206.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 38 9.55 9.50
207.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9,50
2M.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9.50
209.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 156 of 186
Cascade: 2001 version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 5
-~-~
Cumulative Instant CUrr~nt Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cfs) (ds) {acre-it} 1ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
~~~=~===============================~_.._-_._.._.~~===========C=============a~~
210.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.38 9.55 9.50
211. DO 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
212.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.39 9.55 9.50
213.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
214.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
215.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.39 9.55 9.50
216.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.39 9.55 9.50
217.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
219.00 2.10 0.00 0,01 1.39 9.55 9,50
219.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9,50
220.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.39 9.55 9.50
221.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.39 9.55 9.50
222.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
223.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
224.00 2.10 D,UG 0.01 l. 39 9.55 9.50
225.00 2.10 D.DO 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
226.00 2.10 D.OO 0.01 1.3' 9.55 .9.50
227.00 2.10 G.OO 0.01 1. 39 9.55 9.50
228.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.. j9 9.55 9.50
229.00 2.10 0.00 D.OI 1. 40 9.55 9.50
::30.00 2.10 " DO :1.01 L .40 9.55 9.S0
2] L U 0 2.10 :).00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
],32.00 2.10 (1.00 0.01 1. 40 9,55 9.50
233.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
234.00 2.10 (LOO 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
235.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9_55 9.50
236.00 2,10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
237.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
238.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
239,00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
240.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
241.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
242,00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
243. 00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
244. 00 2.10 D.DO 0.01 1.40 9.55 9.50
245.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 40 9.54 9.50
246.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.54 9.50
247.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.54 9.50
248.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.54 9.50
249.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1.40 9.54 9.50
250.00 2.10 0.00 0.01 1. 40 9.54 9.50
251.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 40 9.54 9.50
252.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
253.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
254.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
255.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
256.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
257.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
258.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
259.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 41 9.54 9.50
260.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
261.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 41 9.54 9.50
262.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
263.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
264.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
265.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
266.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
267.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
268.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
269.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
270.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
271.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
272.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
273.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
274.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
275.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 157 of 186
Cascade 2001 version 1.0
storm that stages to preBerve 2.1 in 24hr Page 6
Cumulative Instant Current Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
'rime Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage stage
(hr) (in) (efe) (efa) (aere-ft) (ft NGVD) (it NGVD)
=====~=_..D...~e.a..============~*~~_M~================.~=c=c===e==============
276.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 41 9.54 9.50
277.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 41 9.54 9.50
278.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.41 9.54 9.50
279.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
280.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
2B1.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
282.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
283.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9.54 9.50
284.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
2BS. DO 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9.54 9.50
286.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
237.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
238.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
289.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9.54 9.50
290.00. 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
291. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
292.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
293.00 2.10 a.oo 0.00 1.42 9.54- 9.50
294.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 ] .42 9.54 9.50
295.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
296.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.00 L42 9.54 9. so
297.00 2.10 a.oo 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
298.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9,54 9.50
299.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9.54 9.50
300,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9.54 9.50
301. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 42 9,54 9.50
302.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
303.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9_50
304.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
305.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 :1..42 9.54 9.50
306.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
307.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
308.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
309.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
3l0.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.54 9.50
31.1,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.53 9.50
312.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.42 9.53 9.50
313.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
314.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
315.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
316.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
317.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
318.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
319.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 :1..43 9.53 9.50
320.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
321.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
322.00 '2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
323.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
324.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
325.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
326.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
327.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
328.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
329.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
330.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
331. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
332.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
333.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
334.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
335.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
336 .00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
337.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.S3 9.50
338.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
339.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
340.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
341.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 158 of 186
CaBcade 2001 version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr
Page 7
Time
(hr)
Cumulative
Rainfall
(in)
Instant
Runoff
(efs)
Current
Discharge
(efs)
Cumulative
Discharge
(acre-ft)
Head Water
Stage
(ft NGVDI
Tail Water
Stage.
(ft NGVD)
~==~=~======~========================~.._.~m=~c============~==========._uu====.
342.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
343.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
344.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
345.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
346.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
347.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
348.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
349.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
350.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
351. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
352.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
353.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 43 9.53 9.50
354.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
355.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.43 9.53 9.50
356.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1-43 9.53 9.50
357.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 LI14 9.53 9.50
358.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1.44 9.53 9..'50
359.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 1. 44 9.53 9.50
360.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 :1.. ,14 9.53 9.50
s.tructure: : 2
From Basin: Main
To Basin: Offsitel
Structure Type: Gravity
Weir: None
Bleeder: Rect, Invert Elev = 10.5801 ft NGVD, Height = 0.4375 ft, Width = 0.5 ft
Default Coefs: Weir Coef = 3.13, Orifice Coef = 0.6
pipe: Diameter = 1.25 ft, Manning1s n = 0.013, Length ~ 900 ft
US Invert Slev = 9,5 ft NGVD, DS Invert Elev = 7.5 ft NGVD, no flap gate
Time
Ihr)
CumulatiV"e
Rainfall
(in)
Instant
Runoff
(efa)
Curl"ent
nischarge
lefs)
Cumulative
Discharge
(acre-ft)
Head Water
Stago
(it NGVD)
Tail Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
====~..~$~~~~~___~~.~_=~_======c=====================================~=====...~
0.00 0.00 0.00 o .(JO 0.00 9.50 9.50
1.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
2.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
3.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
4..00 0.09 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.50 9.50
5.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 a,GO 9..50 9.50
6.00 0.17 0.00 0.,00 0.00 9.50 9.50
7.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
8.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
9.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
10,00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
11.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50 9.50
12.00 1. 38 13.55 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
13.00 1. 61 2.69 0.00 0.00 9.81 9.50
14.00 1.72 1.58 0.00 0.00 9.87 9.50
15.00 1.78 1.14 0,00 0.00 9.91 9.50
16.00 1. 85 1.16 0.00 0.00 9.94 9.50
17.00 1. 89 0.71 0.00 0.00 9.95 9.50
18.00 1. 92 0.73 0.00 0.00 9.97 9.50
19.00 1. 96 0.74 0.00 0.00 9.98 9.50
20.00 2.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 9.99 9.50
21.00 2.02 0,51 0.00 0.00 9.99 9.50
22.00 2,05 0.51 0.00 0.00 9.99 9.50
23.00 2.07 0.52 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.50
24.00 2.10 0.52 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.50
25.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.99 9.50
26.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.97 9.50
27.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.96 9.50
28.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.94 9.50
29.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.93 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 159 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
storn that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page B
CUmulati va Instant CUrrent Curnulati va Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall RWlOff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage
Ihr) (in) (cfa) (cfa) (acre-ft) 1ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
:=Q=p~===..a===...g~~.m===~~========~=======~========~=~=~=====..~_.~~.~=======
30.00 2.10 0.00 D.DO 0.00 9.91 9.50
31.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.90 9.50
32.00 2.10 0.00 Q,OO 0.00 9.89 9.50
33.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.88 9.50
34.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.87 9.50
35.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.B6 9.50
36.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.85 9.50
37.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.B4 9.50
3B.OO 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.B3 9.50
39.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.B2 9.50
40.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.B1 9.50
41.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.81 9.50
42.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.80 9.S0
43.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,79 9.50
44.00 2.10 0.00 o .co 0.00 9.78 9.50
45.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.7B 9.50
46.00 2 10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9.77 9.50
4'1.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.77 9.50
48,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 (1. 00 9.76 9.50
49,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.75 9.50
50.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.75 9.50
51. 00 2,10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9,74 9.50
52.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.74 9.50
53.00 7..10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.73 9.50
54.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9,73 9.50
55,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.72 9.50
56.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.72 9.50
57.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.72 9.50
58.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.71 9.50
59.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.71 9.50
60.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.70 9.50
61. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.70 9.50
62.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.70 9.50
63.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.69 9.50
64.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.69 9,50
65.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.69 9.50
66.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.68 9.50
67.00 . 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.68 9.50
68.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.6B 9.50
69.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.6B 9.50
70.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.67 9.50
71.00 2.~0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.67 9.50
72 .00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.67 9.50
73.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.67 9.50
74.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.66 9.50
75.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.66 9.50
76.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.66 9.50
77 .00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.66 9.50
78.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.65 9.50
79.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.65 9.50
30.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.65 9.50
31. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.65 9.50
32.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.65 9.50
33.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
B4.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
85.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
86.00 2.~0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
S7.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
88.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 9.50
39.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
90.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
91.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
92.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
93.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
94.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.63 9.50
95,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
Agenda Item No. 88
January 29, 2008
Page 160 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
.storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 9
Cumulati v-e Instant CUrrent Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge St.age Stage
[hr) (in) (of.' (cfs) (acre-ft) (ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
_m~.~=======~M=~~==============================================~======Q=~~=~.~~
96 .00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
97.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
98.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
99.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
100.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
1{J1. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
102.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.62 9.50
103.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
104.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
105.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
106.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
107.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9,50
108.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
109.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
110,00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.61 9.50
111. 00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.61 9.50
112.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
113.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
114.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
115.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
116.00 2.10 0.00 a.oo 0.00 9.60 9.50
117.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
J18.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
119.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 '.1.00 9.60 9.50
120.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
121.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.60 9.50
122.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
123.00 2.10 G.OO 0.00 0.00 9,59 9.50
124.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
125.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
126.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9..59 9.50
127,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
128.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
129.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
130.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
131.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.59 9.50
132.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
133.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.!::i9 9.50
134.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.59 9.50
135.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
136.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.5B 9.50
137.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.sa 9.50
138.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
139.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 9.5B 9.50
140.00 2.10 G.OO 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
141. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
142.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
143.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.SS 9.50
144.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
145.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.5S 9.50
146.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
147.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.SS 9.50
148.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.S0
149.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
150.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
151. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.58 9.50
152.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
153.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.S0
154.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
155.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
156.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
157.00 2.10 0.00 O. DO. 0.00 9.57 9.50
15S.0O 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
159.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
160.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
161. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 161 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
stom that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24.hr Page 10
--_.~~. _.~'-~--'
Cumulative Instant Current CUmulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff DiBcharge Discharge Stage Stage
(hr) (in) (cfa) (cf.) (acre-ft) (ft NGW) (ft NGW)
=~~~c._~~=~__m~=====~=~c~~=========================a==~======_w.~_===~~=~_~.~~~
162.DO 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
163 . 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
164.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
165.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
166.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9,50
167.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
168.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
169.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
170.00 :2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
17LOO 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
172.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.57 9.50
173.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 n.oo 9.56 9.50
174. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
175.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
176.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
177.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.6.6 9.50
178.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.5{}
179.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
lBO.OO 2.10 G.OO 0.00 0,00 9.56- 9.50
181. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
182.00 2.10 0.00 [l.OO O.(lU 9.56 9.50
183.0Q 2.10 0.00 D.OO 0.00 9.56 9.50
184.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9: .50
185.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
186.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
187.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.56 9.50
188.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
169.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
190.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
191. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 a.OD 9.56 9.50
192.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.56 9.50
193.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
194.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
195.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
196.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
197.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
He.oo 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
H9.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
200.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
201.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
202.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 9.50
203.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
204.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
205.00 2.10 ILOO 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
206.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
207.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
208.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
209.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
210.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
211.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
212,00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
213.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
214.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
215.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
216.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,55 9.S0
217.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,55 9.50
218.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
219.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
220.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
22l.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9:55 9.50
222.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
223.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
224.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
225.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
226.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
227.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 162 of 186
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 11
Cumulative Instant Current Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage:
(hr) (in) (cb) (cfs) (acre-ft) (ft NGVD) (ft NGVD)
cccc__~c.cm......c~~==~~==============================~~A=~.===.C===C==========
22B.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
229.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
230.00 2.10 0.00 a.ao 0.00 9.55 9.50
231.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
232.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
233.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
234.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
235.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.55 9.50
236.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
237.00 2.10 0 00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
238.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.55 9,50
239.00 2,10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.55 9.50
240.00 2,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
241.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
242.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.55 9.50
243.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.55 9.50
244.00 2.10 O.CO 0.00 D.OO 9.55 9.50
245.00 2.10 D.OO 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
246.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9,50
247 . 00 ;~ .10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9,50
24 B . 00 2:.J.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54. 9.50
249 . 00 2.~O 0.00 0.00 O.UD 9.54 .9.50
250.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 .;L 50
251. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
252.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
253.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~.54 9.50
254.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 0.00 9,S4 9.50
255.00 2.10 0,00 0.00 o,ao 9.54 9.50
256.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
257.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
258.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
259.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.54 9.50
260.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
261.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
262.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
263.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
264.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54. 9.50
265. DO 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
266.00 2.10 O.bo n.oo 0.00 9.54 9.50
267.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
268.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
269.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
270.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
271.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
272.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
273.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
274.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0_00 9.54 9.50
275.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
276.00 2..10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
277.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
:2'7B,OO 2.10 D.DG 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
279.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
280.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
281.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
282.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
283.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
284.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
285.00 :), ..1.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
286.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
287.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
288.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
289.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
290.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
291. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
292.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
293.{l0 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.51 9.50
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 163 of 186
caecade 2001 version 1.0
storm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr Page 12
Cumulative Instant CUrrent Cumulative Head Water Tail Water
Time Rainfall Runoff Discharge Discharge Stage Stage
(hr) (in) {cfs) (cfs) (acre- ft) (ft NGYO) (ft MGYO)
_._c==========a~=d=m=c=====~~===========================================.~m~=..
294.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
295.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
296.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,54 9.50
297.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
29B.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
299.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
300.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
301. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 .54 9.50
302.00 2.1.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9",50
303.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
304.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
305.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.54 9.50
306.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
307.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
308.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.54 9.50
309.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
310.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.50
311. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0,00 9.53 9.50
312.00 2.10 0.00 (l.GO 0.00 9.53 9.50
313.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9,50
314.00 2.10 0.00 n.oo 0,00 9_53 9,50
315.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9,50
316.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9~53 9.50
317.00 2.10 0.00 D,DO 0.00 9.53 9.50
318.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
319.00 /..10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
320.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.53 9.50
321. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
322.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
323.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
324.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
325.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
326.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
327.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
328.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
329.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
330.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
331.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
332.00 2.10 0.00 0,00 0.00 9.53 9.50
333.00 2.10 0.00 A.OO 0.00 9.53 9.50
334.00 2410 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
335.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
33Ei.OO 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
337.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
338.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
339.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
340.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
341. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
342.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
343.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
344.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
345.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
340.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
347.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
348.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
349.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
350.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
351. 00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
352.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9'.50
353.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
354.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
355.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
356.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
357.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.S3 9.50
358.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
359.00 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.53 9.50
Cascade 2001 Version 1.0
atorm that stages to preserve 2.1 in 24hr
Time
(hr)
Cumulative
Rainfall
(in)
Instant
Runoff
(cfsi
Current
Discharge
(cfs)
Cumulative
Discharge
lacre-ft)
Head Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
,^'genda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 164 of 186
Page 13
Tail Water
Stage
(ft NGVD)
360.00
0.00
0.00
~===================c=c===.~==========~~===========~a~..~.~~~...D=============~
9.50
2.10
STRUCTURE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM DISCHARGES
0.00
Struc
Max Icfs)
Time (hr)
Min Icfs)
.M..==========================um===c=============~==~=m
Time (hr)
1
2
0.45
0.00
24.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
===.m____~~========================..=~================
0.00
0.00
Bl\..9IN MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM STAGES
9.53
Basin
Max (ftl
Time (hr)
Min 1ft)
============c=__=.__.=~~~maD==========~==~~~~~=================
Time (hr)
~~~rn~===================~~===~=K=====C~===============~..===~~=
Main
24.00
10.00
BASIN WATER BUDG8TS (all units in acra-ftl
9.50
0.00
Basin
Total
Runoff
Structu:ce
Inflow
Structure
Outflow
======_.~=~=================~===~~=~~=m~===========~======~=====,~==a~============
Residual
Initial
Storage
Final
Storage
Main
1 44
q~======~====================='~~=~~================~W=~===~~Q~=~=================
0.00
1. 50
0,00
0.00
0.07
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
DC'I,""
DAVIDSON
~NGINEERING
CIVIL ENGINEERING' PLANNING' lAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
NEW HOPE CHURCH
Trip Generation Report
PUD Rezone
Prepared For
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES, INC.
7675 DAVIS BLVD
NAPLES FL 34104
Prepared by
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
2154 Trade Center Way
Naples, Florida 34109
September 2006
Revised January 2007
Revised May 2007
PUDZ-2003.AR.3601
Project: 2003010020
Date: 6/12/07 DUE: 7/11/07
REV: 8
2154 Trade CenlerWay, Suile #3. Naples, Florida 34109. Phone: 239.597.3916. Fax: 239.597.5195
\'fINW.davids.oneng j neeri ng .com
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 166 of 186
INTRODUCTION
This project was originally approved in 1990 as a Provisional Use (PU) for the New
Hope Chureh (Ordinance 90-14). The Provisional Use (PU) is now, and hereinafter,
referred to as a Conditional Use (CU). The site is sitnated on an 18.86010 aere parcel
loeatcd on the north side of Davis Boulevard just east of Santa Bar1:iara Boulevard in
Section 4, Township 50, Range 26E (Figure I). Thc original CU was for a ehurch,
including several ancillary uses (offices, meeting room, ctc.).
Figure 1, Location Map
I
I
i
I
I
I
N
?..ahiUocAt>lIu
t
(l~kl,,,, (<"hlr.,~,,',1Y
Hc.df" lill~(j
n.,.j.B""",,,,"(GRlj.ll
"
~
I ~T~ !
.
,
This petition is to merge this propelty with the adjaecnt property to the west known as the
Neapolitan Park PUD. The Neapolitan Park PUO site consists of an 18.99010 acre parcel
and will be used to create a new 37.85+ aere PUD to aeeommodate a variety of ehurch-
related uses, including a new sanctuary, an administration building, a multi-purposc
building, an edueational building, parking areas, landscaping and preserve areas, and
other typical church-related uses.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The current New Hope Church site is partially developed under the existing CU permit
and eonsists of a 26,700 square foot sanctuary/meeting hall and associated parking, along
with aeeessory office use. The Ncapolitan Park PUO has not yet been deveIopcd and the
land is vacant. The Neapolitan Park PUO is currently zoned for the development of81
multi-family dwelling units, 150,000 SF of office development, and three out-pareels that
could contain up to about 38,115 SF of additional commercial.
The combined sites are bounded to the east hy Wildwood Residential PUO, to the nOlth
by hoth Wildwood Residential PUO and Santa Barhara Elementary School and an
EMS/Fire Station, to the west by an undeveloped commercial PUD (Shoppes of Santa
Barhara PUD) and to the south by the Davis Boulevard right-of-way (Figure 1).
TRIP GENERATION METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATIONS
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffie Impact Statement
2
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29,2008
Page 167 of 186
Trip generation rates are taken from Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation
Engineers, 7'h Edition. Beeause the Neapolitan Park PUD portion of the site has boon
vacant since it was originally zoned and because the proposed use is consistent with the
existing use, this traffic analysis is based on the proposed PUD rather than assuming any
"vested" trips for thc eurrent zoning. However, the current church use on the original site
will be accounted for in the development of the net new trips on the adjacent roadway
network.
CImrch (LUe 560) was used for the proposed rczone (Table!). Trip Generation uses two
independent variables for presentation of thc data: 1000 SF GFA; and, Seats. In addition,
beeause the traditional church uses and traf1ic peaks are usually on tbe weekend, data is
available for the weekend and is used in this analysis as wcll as weekday trips (Tables I
and 2).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Table 1, Tril} Generation: Existing Chnrch (LUC 560)
X = 26.8 Thollsand Square Feet, 700 Scats
Analvsis Criteria Study Period Eouation Trips Entetiul! Exitinl!
Weekdav .. J~9 .Il()(} ._ 244 (50%) 122 (50%) 122
Weekday S.F. AM Peak T=O.72(X) 19 (54%) ]1 (4Q'1.) 9
_'__n___.___, (52%) 9 (48%) 9
PM Peak T=0.66(X) ]8
Satnrday S.F. Daily T=10.37/X) 278 (50%) 139 (50%) 139_
----..-.-
Office/Other Peak Hour T=3.54(X) 95 (71%)68 (29%) 27
- --- -_._~--,,- ------- -- ____nO _-=-'-
Satnrday Seats ___[)_aiiy T=0.90IX) 630 (50%) 315 . (50,,(O)_l~
Sanctuary Peak Hour T=0.60(X) 420 143%) 181 (57%)239
Sunday S.F. Daily r.ll(T)=0.59LnlJO+4.77 821 (50%) 411 (50%) 411
_ Offic!!Qtj1eJ"____ Peak Hour T=9.59(X)+73.65 330 (50%) 165 (50%) 165
._--. -'--'-
Sunday Seats Daily T=1.53(X) 1071 (50%) 536 (50%) 536
.-.,
SanctuaT:Y Peak Hour T=0.61 (X)+l 1.56 439 (52%) 228 (48%) 211
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed new buildings on the site plan for phase 2 of eonstruction will be used as a
multi-purpose recreational and learning facility. The building will eontain a gymnasium,
kitchen, and learning stations. After speakillg with the ministry's main administrator, he
gave us some insight into what the future use of this building will be. The use will
primarily coincide with the use of the existing sanctuary. Therefore, the new building will
llot generate many new trips. For instanee, church members may have thcir childrcn in
Bible Study while they are in service. Additionally, members may stick around and
congregate in this building after service on Sundays and Wednes(lays. This may even
help to alleviate the mass exiting immediately after scrvice gets out by allowing the
traffic to slowly trickle out over a longer period of time.
New Hope Church Revised pun Traffic Impact Statement
3
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 168 of 186
There will be another new multi-purpose building of similar use to the above built in
Phase 3. Additionally, the existing church will be converted to another multi-purpose
building of similar nse as well. By the end of Phase 3, there will be a total ofthrec
aneillary use buildings. A new sanctuary housing 4,200 scats is planned to be part of
Phase 3 as well.
PH ASE 2
Table 2, Trip Generation: Multi-Use Building (Phase 2)
Trips Based on Church Administrator's Prcdiction
X =45,3 Thousand Sq. Feet
Analysis Criteria Study Period Trips Entering Exiting
~~eck(~ . 100 (50%)50 .\50%) 50
-
Weekday S.F. AM Peak 14 __L ((1Q~.)8 (40%) 6
--_._~-~.._- -
l'Ml'eak 22 (40%) 9 (60%) 13
Saturda)' S.I<', ____Daily____ gO (50%) 40 (50%L42 .
--------
Peak HoUl' 30 (50%) 15 (50%)15
Sunday S.F. Daily ]20 (50%) 60 (50%) 60
.. ------ --(50%) 30
Peak !lour 1 60 (50%) 30
PHASE 3
Table 3, Trip Generation: Net New Church O.UC 560) (Phase 3)
Existing Sanctuary to be Converted to Educational Building
X =68.3 Thousand Squarc Feet, 4,200 Seats
Analysis Criteria Study Period Equation Trins Ellteril\!l Exitinl!
Weekc\ay T=9.11(X) 622 (50%) 311 (50%) 311
----
Weekday S,F. AM Peak T=O.72(X) 49 f54%) 26 (46%) 23
.
PM Peak T=0.66(X) 45 (52%) 23 (48%) 21
Saturday S.F. ~Daily T=10.37(X) 708 (50%) 354 (50%) 354
Peak Hour T=3.54(X) 242 (71%) 172 (29%) 70
.----- -- ------- T=0.90(X) 150%) 1890
Saturday Seats Daily 3780 (50%) 1890
--.-....- . (43%) 1084
Peak Hour T=0.60IX) 2520 (57%) 1436
Snnday S.F. Dailv Ln(T)=0.~.9Ln(X)+4. 77 1329 (50%) 665 (50%) 665
Peak Hour T~9.59(X)'I73 .65 729 (50%) 365 (50%) 365
Sunday Seats Daily T~ 1.531X) 6426 (50%) 3213 (50%) 3213
Peak Hour T=0.61(X)+11.56 2574 (52%) 1338 (48%) 1236
Table 4, Trip Generation: Lcarning Ccntcr (Phase 3)
New Hope Chureh Revised PUD Traffie Impact Statement
4
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 169 of 186
Similar in Use & Trip Generation to Phase 2 Building
X =40.8 Thousand Sq. Feet
Analvsis Criteria Study Period Trins Enterhl!! Exitin!!
Weekday 100 (50%) 50 (50%) 50
-'--------. (40%)6
Weekday S.F. AM Peak 14 (60%2 8
PM Peak 22 (40%) 9 (60%) [3
Saturday S.F. Daily 80 (50ri! 40 (50%) 40
".~..
Peak Hour 30 (50%) 15 50%) 15
Sunday S.F. Dailv 120 (50%) 60 50%) 60
_...-..- 50%) 30
Peak Hour 60 (50%) 30
Table 5 Tl'ip Genemtion: Existiug Church Converted (Phase 3)
Similar in Use & Trip Generation to Phase 2 Building
X =27.9 Thousand Sq. Feet
Analysis Criteria Stndy Petiod TrillS Entermg Exltinp
Weekday 100 _J50%)~Q (50%) 50
---- -'~--'--'--
Weekday S.F. AM Peak 14 (60%) 8 140%)6
-- -'-'-"'" .-...
PM Peak 22 (40%)9 (60%) 13
Satlll'day S.F. Daily____ 80 . (50%) 40 (50%) 4L
Peak Hour 30 (50%) 15 (50%) 15
Sunday S.F. Daily 120 (50%) 60 (50%) 60
.--.' (50%) 30 . (50%)30
Peak I-Tour 60
Table 6 Total New Trips
New church and Three Ancillary Use Buildings
Analysis Cl'iteria Study Period Trins Enteri1l2 Exit!n!!
Weekday 922 (50%) 461 (50%) 461
Weekday S.l? AM Peak 91 (60%) 55 (40%) 46
PM Peak 111 (40%) 44 (60%) 67
Satllrday S.F. Daily 4020 50%) 2010 (50%) 2010
Peak Hour 2610 50%) 1305 (50%) 1305
SlIllday S.F. _.J:l~ilI 6786 50%) 3393 (50%) 3393
Peak Hour 2754 (50%) 1377 (50%) 1377
Table 7 Net New Ttips
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
5
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 170 of 186
Credit Back Existing Church
New church and Three Anclllary Use Buildings
Analvsis Criteria Study Period Trios Enterinl!. Exitinl!.
_'Yeek~ay 678 (50%) 339 1500/;;)339
Weekday S.II. AM Peak 72 160%)43 (40%)29
PM Peak 93 (40%\ 37 (60%\ 56
Saturday S.F. Daily 3.190 (50%) 1695 (50%) 1695
Peak Hour 2190 150%) 1095 (50%) 1095
Sunday S.F. naily 5715 (50%) 2858 (50%) 2858
..-.. (50%) 1158
Peak Hour 2315 (50%) 1158
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The proJeet will allract trips from the surrounding residential arcas of East Naples,
Golden Gate City, Golden Gate Estates and North Central Naples. Due to the cxisting and
proposed constraints on aceese at the project hontage along SR 84, although some
arriving trips willllse SR 84, there will be no departing trips heading eastbound on SR
84. There will be an interconncetion along the northern boundary of the future Shoppes
of Santa Barbara. This will permit exiting traffic to aceess Santa Barbara Boulevard in a
northbound direetion only.
Based on discussions with the Pastor of New Hope Church, the antieipated eongrcgant
draw will be about one-third from each of three directions: north; south; and, west.
Congregants leaving the site will, however, be initially eonstrained to traveling west and
north. Those wanting to continue south will need to travel north to Radio Road and then
east 011 Davis Blvd. (SR 84) to Collier Blvd. (CR 951). After Santa Barbara Blvd. is
extended south to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, many of those nOlthbound to castbound
trips will be able to use that extension.
The anticipated traft1e distribution for entering and exiting traffic is shown on Figure 2 on
the next page.
Figure 2. Trip Distribution Percentages
New Hope Chureh Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
6
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 171 of 186
~J
!
'.::
u
>
ill
e
1- ~ l 25% t! I
" ~ ~c V
~I )1 25% ~ UJ i
,Davis BI1
Sij
.~
'rD ~I D~
\, ff~~__~\~~:b
\((,,_d7 j/ ~ (]
1\ - D 5'Q,
'[I '),col.
~.J ()
,
\
: I I
Q_ u-wrl aV~':lahle,
Y'i r'bOllt 90IJ ./-~
___:J , j/
~--l
//7,r--)-
PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
--~.~.
.I
~
f
c-
,"
Davis Boulevard from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) was
scheduled to be improved to a six-lane section by to 2012. However, recently, the FnOT
removed this segment from the Work Program. Collier County is currently negotiating
with FDOT to return it to the Work Program. Santa Barbara Boulevard from Davis
Boulevard (SR 84) to Golden Gate Parkway is currently out to bid and is expected to be
six-laned by 2012. That project will also include const11lction to complete the four-lane
improvements to Radio Road from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Davis Boulevard (SR 84).
Santa Barbara Boulevard Extension from SR 84 to Rattlesnake Hammock Road is
scheduled for operation hy 2012 per the Collier County 2006 AUIR. After discussion
with TYLand on the Davis Blvd. expansion, we have detennincd that the existing left
turn entrance for the Chureh wi1\ remain in place, no ingress or egress changes are
proposed.
PROPOSED BUILDOUT SCENARIO
The full build out of this project is anticipated to be completed in the year 20] 2,
Figure 3. AM Peak Hour
New Hope Chureh Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
%
= Entering
= Exiting
7
~-)-J~~ ~
fl~~JA,l7 ~~ ~4l.
- -" ~
. . . adio Rd
'0 ~
55 '00. ~.
<01 0; u. ~
25% ro h(
1 W' ~l ! ~ Site/ Ii. --:.r.1.,D . .1 ~lDjl'{
/ ) %! I r: I".fl \\;, ,~LQ Si
.. ~')~, , . 25%~CR~~4_,,~O:.?';f~'C'O~(:]
':.'1 Davisl BIVd~X~' 11. :: \,1' r ,). --'-1
.. I I ! I 1 1 'I . ~
.L i i 7 7) T
, :
, I " .. ." '., I
~~J 1 'y/ ,./-.7.""' } 1--
.,
i
I
1
'0
>
O:'i
25% ~
;4 !~
2
25%f
pavis Blvd Exl 9
i 14
1
++
.25%
9
114
T1
SITE IMPACT ANALYSIS
14
I
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffic 1mpaet Statement
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 172 of 186
lv=
'......
1~~b-._ __
(
)
/
/
)
(
)
------
/
L
/
8
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 173 of 186
Based on a five year average annual background AADT the growth rates are about 4.9%
(West of Radio Rd.) and 0.6% for Santa Barbara Blvd, (Radio-SR84) per Collier County
Traffie Counts. This average growth rate has been applied to the 2006 AUIR
(Background Traffic + Trip Bank) to foreeast the LOS in 2012. Note that the existing
ehureh is included in the Collier County traffic counts and that net new trips have heen
added in to the 2012 value in Table 9.
Table 8, .5 - Yelll' .5-Year Hl~t(l/'ical Growth
Impacted Segment
2002
ADT
2003
ADT
2004
ADT
2005
ADT
2006
ADT
s-yr Avg.
His!.
Growth Rate
A
--.
Davis Blvd. 14122 1
[Santa Barbara Blvd. to CR 951]
Santa Barbara 0-'-
[Radio Rd. to SR 84] 20531 2
4200
I
[1
4965 16475 17045 4.9%
9821 19270 20906 0.6%
~
B
0111
Note: 5.Yr A I'g. historic growth rate calculated using Collier County 2()f)6 Average DaiZV
li'afJic
Table 9. :; - Year Horizon Background Traffic
Peak DirectionlHour 2006 A UlR
-.........-----.---- .... .. . -'.-' ----.-----
5-yr Avg. 2006 2012 +
Road Segment Hist. AUlR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 proj eet
Growth Rate Total Trios
-------...--. --.-.. ~~. .. ..
Davis Blvd (SR 84) 4.9% 1748 1834 1924 2018 2117 2220 2357'
.JSanta Barbara Blvd, to CR 9511 .----
Santa Barbara Blvd 2.0% 1486 1516 1546 1577 1608 1641 1701"
[Radio Rd. to SR 84]
*Segmentfails, however is in TCMA
** Segment still has ],549 trips capacity
Tflble ] O. Impacted Roadway Segments
.
ID# Segment Service BT TB RC PT LOS
Volume
16 A: Davis Blvd (SR 84) 1,530 1,240 508 -232 14 F***
Santa Barbara Blvd. to CR 951
78 B: Santa Barbara Blvd 536 ~
3,250 950 1,750 14 13
e--' Radio Rd. to SR 84
~
. BT'" Background Traftic (Existi11g)
. TB", Trip Bank
. RC", Remaining Capacity
. PT", Project Trips
. LOS", Level of Service
Consistency Impact
New Hope Chul'eh Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
9
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 174 of 186
Segment ill If 16: ] 411,530 = 0.92% < 3%, but segment is in TCMA and Failing, so we have
employed TDM strategies as seen in the following.
Segment ill If 78: 14/3,250 ~ 0.43%<3%, segment has plenty of capacity remaining.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
This segment ofSR 84 is within the East Central TCMA. Thcrefore, in addition to GMP
Policies 5.1 and 5.2, Policies 5.7, 5.8 and 5.9 must also be addressed. Poliey 5.7 requires
that new development be measured against the percentage oflane miles meeting the LOS
requirements in the Transportation Element. Policy 5.8 requires that at least 85% of the
lane miles within the TCMA be kept at or above the LOS in the GMP or modification or
mitigation will be required of the new developmcnt. Finally, Policy 5.9 requires that a
proportionatc share be paid by the new development if eertain conditions are not me!.
The project is consistent with thc policies oflhe Traftic Circulation Element of the
Growth Management Plan as follows:
. Policy 5.1- The project does not signiticantly impaet the adjacent roadway
network (3'Y", 3%, 5%).
. Policy 5.2 -rhe project has a de minimis impact on the adjacent roadway
network (<1 %).
. Policy 5.7 - The project is within the East Central TCMA.
. Policy 5.8 - The projeet will not cause more than 16% (100% - 85%) of the
roadway network within the TCMA to fall below the LOS standards.
. Poliey 5.9 - The project will impact a constrained roadway link (Davis
Boulevard fi'om Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard (CR 951);
however, this impact is de minimis. Therefore, no additional payment shall
be necessary.
TCMA REQUIREMENTS
As per Policy 6.2 ofthe implementation strategy, we eomply with the fol1owing TCMA
requirements:
d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips
generated hy the development. The addition of a multi-purpose building will generate
little new trips and the hours of operation will eoincide with that of the church. The
church's main hours of operation are during Sunday, which will not coincide with the
peak hours of the adjacent roadway.
h) Bicycle and Pedestrian/acilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of
travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. We have provided
Payment in Lieu of a sidewalk for the seetion of the property fi'onting Davis Blvd. and we
have provided bicycle racks on-site. There are also new bicycle lanes incorporated in the
widening of Santa Barbara Blvd. We have obtained an aeeess agreement to the adjaeent
New Hope Chureh Revised PUD Traffle lmpact Statement
JO
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 175 of 186
futme Santa Barbara Shops. This will help to reduce trips generated on Davis Blvd. by
allowing traffic direet access to the adjacent commercial property. Also, New Hope
Ministries will be providing a sidewalk for pedestrians and bicycles eonneeting to the
adjacent commercial property. This will help to reduee automobile travel by eneouraging
pedestrian and bicycle travel to and from the site.
TURN LANE ANALYSIS
Davis Blvd.
Currently the site provides 2 turn I anes for entcring the site: a 485 ft right turn ilUle (no
qucue length required) and a 515 ft left turn lane, 385 ft with 130 feet of queue length,
The right hand turn lane is eurrently maxed out and will remain in plaee and operational
during and aftcr eonstruction with no modifications pl'Oposed.
Per FOOT Index 301, the left turn lane is based on a design speed of (,5 mph (55 mph
speed limit) and an entry speed of 55 mph. The FDOT turn lane requirement is 460 feet
(ineluding a 50' taper) plus the queue length. Based on the Sunday peak, left turn
movemc11t of290 vph/ 60 = 4.83 x 25(staeking) ~ 121 feet of storage required. Cun-ently
therc is a 55' queue, which will not accommodate the Sunday peak hour trips. We will
however add 200' to the left hand hIm lane queue when this project readies full build out
to handle the storage requirements and help offset the Sunday peak hour left hand turn
movement.
Santa Barbara Blvd.
Since we havc obtained an access agreement with the adjacent eommercial property on
Santa Barbara Blvd.(Dolphin Plaza of Naples), we arc able to usc tliis as an aecess point
to our property. Currently, Santa Barbara Blvd. is being widcncd and tnrn lanes have
been incorporatcd into thc Dolphin Plaza property. There are two right turn lanes at 240'
heading into the Dolphin Plaza property from Santa Barbara Blvd. North. Additionally,
there will be a 240' left turn lane heading into the Dolphill Plaza Propelty hcading
Southbound on Santa Barbara. These tumlanes havc bcen designed and analyzed by
Wilson-Miller Engineering, the engineers who have designed the Dolphin Plaza propmty.
The engineers have already reeeived an ROW permit for this work.
SUNDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The impacted segment of roadway on Santa Barbara is emTently operating at LOS B
during the weekday. If this background traffic on the impacted segment of roadway on
Santa Barbara grows at 2.0%, there will be a remaining capacity of 1549 trips, including
our project trips. That lcaves a large amount of capacity on thc roadway segment during
the weekday, Thcre will be signifieantly less background traffic on Sundays, leaving no
reason for further Sunday traffic allcviation strategies.
After performing a Sunday traffie eount <luting the peak three hour period, 10:00am-
1 :OOpm, we have concluded that Davis Blvd. is not presently failing during Sunday Peak.
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
11
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 176 of 186
We found there to be a peak hour, peak direction volume of798 trips (Please see attached
count in Appendix).
[fthis background traffic grows at 4.9%, the peak hour, peak direction traffic in 2012
should be 1063, This growth rate is reflective of the historical weekday AADT on this
segment. Therefore, this rate is more restrictive than the actual growth rate for Sunday
traffic. This leaves a peak hour, peak direction capacity of: 1530-1063 = 467. A
significant remaining eapacity while our project would only impose another 579 Sunday
trips, peak direction, peak hour onto this segment. This would put the segment of
roadway on Davis Blvd. slightly over the servicc capacity; howevcr we will employ a
few strategies and arguments to mitigate this overage,
.
New Hope Ministrics presently employs a Florida Highway Patrolman to help
direct and alleviate Sunday Peak Hour traffic conditions in front of New Hope on
Davis Blvd. Corporal Bob Brown has been on duty, direeting traffic during
Sunday peak hour on Davis Blvd. for the past 14 years (Doeumentation of
services provided in Appendix). He will continue to provide this service in the
future as long as New Hope Ministries requires the servi<:c.
The dosing of the Flea Market on Davis Blvd. has helped to ease Sunday traffic
on Davis Blvd. immensely. Corporal Bob Brown stated that he has scen a 70%
improvemcnt in Sunday peak hour traffic wnditions sinee the elosing ofthc tlea
market.
CUlTently there is signiikant capaeity in the turn lanes leading into New Hope
Ministries to accommodate the future Sunday peak hour traffie conditions,
However, New Hope Ministries will lengthen the left turn lane on Davis Blvd. hy
200' upon full build out of the Church to nlrther aecommodate the left hand
turning movement.
With the two existing turn lanes and the addition of the three turning lanes into
Dolphin Plaza on Santa Barbara, our seeond aeccss point, we feel confident that
the Sunday peak hour traffic will have plenty of aceess/egress to/from New Hope
Ministries.
This section of Davis Blvd., up to the interseetion with Santa Barbara Blvd., is 4-
laned and not 2-laned, so the roadway leading up to the interseetion is actually
capable of handling slightly more volume.
Santa Barbara Boulevard Extension ii'om SR 84 to Rattlesnake Hammoek Road is
schedulcd for opcration by 2012 per the Collier County 2006 AUIR. This will
help to alleviate traffie on Davis Blvd.
Davis Boulevard from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard (CR 951)
was scheduled to be improved to a six-lane section by to 2012. However, recently,
FDOT removed this segment from the Work Program. Collicr County is currently
negotiating with FDOT to return it to the Work Program. This would
tremendously increase the capaeity of Davis Blvd. and alleviatc any future traffic
issues associatcd with New Hope Ministries' expansion.
.
.
.
.
.
.
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffie Impact Statement
12
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 177 Df 186
APPENDIX
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffic Impact Statement
13
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 178 of 186
Sunday Background Traffic Count:
Davis Blvd. (Santa Barbara Blvd. to CR 951) Sundav, 4/29/07 (10:00 am-1:00 pm)
Direction 10:00-10:15 10:15-10:30 10:30-10:45 10:45-11 :00
---.-..--..---- ., .'--...--
Westbound 135 167 . .. 204 218
---.------. ---
Eastbound 127 121 152 156
____.m_...._...._~__ 11:15-11:30'- --- .--
11 :00-11 :15 11:30-11:45 -, 11 :45-12:00
---- .. ,
Westbound 195 181 115 106
~--~~. '_'U -, "-"-- ,
Eastbound 191 163 147 155
~- 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 I. 12:45-1 :00
._-----,
Westbound t95 212 209 164
,. . L==i(jo' ....,..
Eastbound 154 155 138
--". ----_.'-'.- ---_._-~-- ,,-
Sunday Peak Hour/Peak Direction
=
798 trips
(Wes/bound; 10:30, 11:30)
New Hope Church Revised PUD Traffie Impact Statement
14
Florida Highway Patrol Agreement:
n5i03/2ca7 17;31 ~(,1 ~~4 ~}7D
FCH::1,1')/HJt;'fJ.U,y I'MI<D
Florida Highway Patrol
Traffic Homicide
3205 Gee" A1.1\IIHVUld
NHfllt!!<\. r:lorioa Mi14~1201
Ofl!co: 2.39 3[.4'!..3Tl
Fax Cover Page
1 ra!tlc 11:~mlicidG Orlioe Fnl<. NUl1lbor: ~~30 :.H14.2~H8
DMO: 061C3J:iOU7
II):
AmJrewr'l.lth
r(}>:; 7:~[}.bHt.b196
-_.__.~"~~.__.-
From: Corpcrnl R Ii. Bf(Jvm
Cornmc!,'rt:i!l: ~ndrl,,'Y/'
As Ilr;u OLJf discuSS-Ion, tlese Ie 8 sample ol'UW1fciOO"n'Jruy.....
r:.mploymenl f~,n,~~ ljla ow r,1ag9Itn\ii'iif.'\.\i'Q--lilUbmll t1llJ~f:t
Imlflti li11f1U[\\ly for M"S'ccon ary,E.nlPIO}'Int1J)! (l8'fIl19. I'Ve
~oli)fiTtarnn r;cJI1I,'_ol~\oj-'tropeMii'i$rfieS:ii~
1003. WIl hove h.,fth"t delSlllo" .,; 11OW.voT,TilOliT
k-novTol.ir lnithil l'onr Y~Hl nm~ an ng e Sf:!. (! rr:o
kneVl. -.., ...~~..
GorpllldTUob Brow"I" .".~
I otal Pag". (including cover page): .L
New Hope Church Revised PlJD Traffie Impaet Statement
Agenda Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 179 of 186
P'iGE 01/1J.:.!
15
l\genda Item No. 8B
January 29. 2008
Page 180 of 186
)!:;!1J8/:.;UlL' 11::;:<'
'141 ]!;<1-,;>::l7fj
r IJI ,~,~:v ,I-IT;-'! 1~.Wi ?(iiTo:G
P/,:.;E (j?/e2
Ll1
u
~.
~t
~=;:,~
~.
.<~
~~
\/).
.~
REQUEST TO WORK SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT
.. r fW!IUNrr "N'IIOVAL 10 wmUii 1J11..mm
.~ <JUlur~Cill;~t<.!"'r~'cllplll')'m-llnt
)S ~~ III IHJlk-'" l)\f1r~t
j,mJlf.nyorr JJf\..} _I-l.~:l'& M\t-:lJ ~Jr)jf ~J
Atll;lI~~: 7(~1(', J.:!!"'V_Ii7.B(l!l)~1!A.!1.f.:"m~~.d:.J.1l..i'
Frlllll!F1 !:lLr.!~wiO; ..h/" K~..'\l.P _= Gl\9~r'lt
!il"'"ln" ~IHIII": .J:::B:J:H":lr. ~Cn~~_
Ul,uMlr;" fr,......lleo:i:I."r.~. j:1 rv\.l t_J~':::-1
:'-cl'~ll\ll"r'~ r.l_f,W. {,/',t;>J{f/';!1lA..!...B.c.J!H';f n, B~{li.rJIJ
~. _tc.
l1J
~Ir rl<l)"tlr:-~
^'Irll."~' JI1
.' r'['1'I~I\' BlI~lhU~I!l:
l.
,~.,,,"~",, ;IiiIIii
1l1","~I"""R""'"<<' ..
s~r,~JulM'.'l ~N1I(l1
"J[
1;"II,IIYr-"
&n'I'lu~Otl.,
'.t1~mr;~!
r,,:l~tt.t,.:____
f'JlIl ..,,~. fl'!'/rlw.li;
I "imdf}' Il'~~1I1~~h'..
-F'I~df1C ,11IH"l!~
'i I'ttI: 1!1P_ I ~ HlIl</1 .
DI~l~lI~1I I'mrn l(nliHl(.t;~c:
n~"~'I"", I;Ulllllc~I'Ill!II;"
:!,:I,..i<JI(>,"~ 1101110;
>I"lw(lul"r~, "'~Il\n
",~, l:/l'll' nr olt-llql~ J'''li~e .wn"I"V'T,..,,1 .t ;1, IJlI.,ilIC~~ Of ..~t..1I.~i"hTllr,,1 will,," "..U~ "lcol-lffllr, ''''\'\:r~tiu. 1<<)' ,,'It'~I\lI
"(JI\"umpt'on Ida n:lIul~, llml prlm:l1j1 }lol.rld UI. bw.;lrl(!.\lu lu pnlhlbil,uJc~r.(:Jloldl; '....mllt.l;lll-'/I"HI' '.!Itrcy M.nlJn' (;h.OIf1lc:rfi.,
tt':HF'T('jlA1.lmlltl~ wnRJ(fl'"1 MAV #(Ir E'XOI'f'llll!r)liLioI'>l"^M1PI;1I rJo.ll'ill"' pm le::y' Ho.
^r4i II!tH;lwIIU tlIlVfloI,..J't'-' ~.)l111M B"Wlumpflr"l I'm prtllrll.,,,,'l
I'lll ~~"
,f ~l!.S, c~S'!!Iln undr.r ....t1nl r.nnilnIilIJII:
1 }Cwm _" ",'III Oil( UlIu Ill/)' ~lilttl ~i;"111i:3<l, If~q. ploof lll.wmlllrs; CWl1ppl\Ii;lttj<ln 1I1ld ll&tllllty In!lUI\111"41t lltttI~hiII1ll(1'lIfo. I
I(tHhlllt.lmll11~llh~ miliA {of FJOlfldl1 ....fll nltbliJll'll!pqll~ dl1RllI~ l:OllftHIIJM yrnllhlPi ml' Coillll '1f lilt' 1111111&111 Nftllll.ln fM U....
ClWllt"JIlO ....((1 In pnvtflll detll/~td frolfl u m()l!lhlr (10)'1"011, lhlllu~p ~II!11 fltl}'iC'l~ ~I<:tj~n will ilUYlII plllfMlllV iLl.m'UIt tn
lilY ...."IM ,""",I~h. ii" ulll"'l tlIhlcl'-l 1""'~L'tI!Llllllll' Jrmibtd ~ont~I" uwu.IIDI rlmlng lI.eo JJly ,[ U"~'L1l1ll JUlill ua"''>>ll.lblll11rlnd
C""H~nll 'I limJ\!:Id to \'ol1i!rk>; 011 "'1I1~h 1I illJl<i'''l:o IO["lt'<lf1\.~r.t UiI requltall. 1rI SlrfdhlClI'. I iI~kl101/01nr1QA ~1 , ~m
I'WIfI(Imlt,ir. rIll 11111 llO(tlllJootm fI I ..m I'" 1W\~l I will 011.0 pi!)' I'IIlIAAQII 110M F1r..t4.l J:lWlu\.<t!. I' "I'{ ~hM8 b. ltlt.ttII. I
"'I\I!..>I\l.j_ml rllA'lI m1.6t comJ!1y \fl'llh Cltl'lptN II tt)....., tiKi fliP Ilnl~ ","0(11)...1, In~udlllS tlli' 1'$/J11-on~11'1l1t)' 10 oJ~1l WflJWjlt! .
r....m/Xl"uU"n anll Jl~t't<tlnlllo1bl:l~ l'IIUUln.:-" \".....~t'lU~- r.util~t. I ~Oll.\-fl~ t<l t11C' flltll:rll~ lJf IlJI hlotGf4 l\i1.1l1IU Ie Ill)'
~,,~u,. ....Ul ~_C41 urr.ullt'{WlUl th8lHf1plcrr.r(lJ Wnrd muvo.. .thll11lrlpk~'NSl h1lCl wn ftOllftMllll1llt I nm"llt1jltfltlll tfllAro...u"J
r~lIl1tl. I lJlI"Il'''Jtonrf t illlI It'Sp4fIAll~1I flW' )oI~ ~ IlvbtlD\I Inb,u,~l "lid I Vllrlr., Ullft 10 Ihll jl(;o"t OJr frl~ h,....~ l!.Inh
<I<,,~i"'~IIIU"'tlO~ nUl t"'r~llt1I\oft tl)nrllct 1Y-1l11tJrco4.' ,. I
RBQUESTeR 810tJA'lJtu~:
.MIIOT nil I\r-<:QMMllrUlF,lI BYUP.lJ'fell/tl\'1 01'1 fllGlHI!RAtlO A..t'R~'rlED 0"1 lftO(W COMM^NtJf.R Dtl;lIKJHf.~J
lUJCt",IMF,N(l; 25 ~F.s
""'pr-:.r>vt:Il, ~Y~(l
SI:>-NoI,nml'"
OM'ft,
"0
..
__.R-
L
""
I
f'r1/)11J~ttml Arp.lll'"",11:iIQr1oo'
~~tl
110
IrVAr.,/lol,(l(lllltltll<1;
Dhl'J'!AI'I'I!OVAl.pl(l'lflF-S:
tl(ltN(lI~M!l \IlT\!_ t<1"'J~ji
New Hope Chnreh Revised PUD Traffic Impaet Statement
16
Jan. 10. 2008 4:03PM
PkOENIX ASSOCIATES OF S F INC
No. 6397 AgE9tld.i Item No. 8B
January 29, 2008
Page 181 of 186
AGR.EEMENT REGARDING FUTI.JRE CROSS ACCESS
ThJs Ag...OlMI Re....diog furore C1'061 Acces. (Ill. "A&mn'JOIIl") i.o mad.lhIs IOtb d'l'
.f JlIlUory, 2008, by and botwe"" Dol..,I. Pi.... .t l>ioJllt8, LLC, 0 I1lol'Jdn llolJlod liabUUy
COIO)>lIDY. Ita .aeeos. and/or ...laOI ('Dolphin"), 8lld New Hope MlWsirl...IIU:.,. Jlloridn
n.t.ro.r-prom ....por.I""', 1.. .OCOOSBOt, Uldlo, osslJll& ("New Hope').
WHEIlIM, New Hope repr....... .nd __ to Dolpldn thai b " Iho oWller and
po......r of . porecl .f real prope.rty adj.....1 to l\Ie llolph!,n Propcr1J (dcftned below) leaauy
dNCrlbc:d on ar.blblt 'A" .twned berm and 1lUlIlo . pan her..,' (1lle .N.... Hope p,optlI't)'''):
and
WIIIlllEAS, Dolphin ...p......u 8nd W8nlHlll t. New Hope ""I il " the .woe, and
pas,,,,,or of a paroel of ,m property adj..... to (lie Now Hope Property I'Bolly doocribc:d on
Exl1\bk "II' 81l1cOedhorefo 8nd DlIdc a part hereof (lite 'Dolphin Propl.ll)''1: Illd
WHEREAS, in COlInOCtIon wltll Now Hope', rczoniog of Ill. Now Hope Propcny,
CoIU.. County. I'loll.lla J""'IuiriDi thai New Hopo oblain from Dolphin on __ 10 provld.
in 1110 future a u""-axol,,,lvo vo1tioular access easement for vehlculor In_. 8lld ._ only
IOros. 1l1e llolphln P'operty 10 provide vehicular at\i'.OSl to Illd from Son.. Sarbara lIouJevard
and lb. W.., proJll'l'U' line of llIl: New Hope I'tOpoTly for th. btnefit of New Hope .. the OWllCl'
.f the New Hope Property on leIlIIlI and coOOki... .. .el forlh below ('New Hope Cro.. Ae"",.
R"'lulremellt");aud
WHEREAS, llolJlllln his "8reed 10 provide Ih. N.w Hope Crol' Aooeu Rtquir..._
conditioned on tbe lJaUafaction of th~ temlI and coo:1itions lid forth in this A*:rccmenl; and
WHI!:I\I!A8, Doljilin is in lIle prQCel. of (0' pl.n, to lllllllnd) lUIlOn4ll1g the Dolphin
Properly'. Site !kv.lopmem Plan (Ill. 'llolpblo Bile Devclopm.nt Plan") loll fin.lizing other
malllllO related to Dolpllln', pr.polIed doveiopmOJll of tho Dolphin Pro,perty, which amc:ndmeollO
tIlo Dolphin Site Development PI.. Iud proposed d.volopment of the Dolphi. Propony may
chaoS" Ifom lime 10 tblle; ....
WJaREAS, Do/pbIo 11M '<qu..ted .... N... Hope h.. .,rood 10; (i) ,[ani a .on-
exeJuDivc veWcu1ar ~ cucm. for vdIicuJar incre.. IlD4 "SI"GII only acroll dlo Now Hope::
Proparty to provJd. vehicular ececa. 10 and from Da.. lloul.valCl and Wildwood Lake.
Boul.vOl'd Io[ tho benenl of Dolphin .nd Uto Dolphin Prop.rty (the 'Dolphin AcwlS"): (II)
c....lll 10 ..d .upport tho Dolphin Site Dev.lopmtDl Plan, BlllI (lU) [clmbunc Dolphin for I..
,...ooabk: COlli. llIId .xpelISts 0..:100111I r..lOllIlbJ. ,'lolnoy'. feca) In COllllOOllOIl wltl, the
negotiation and proparatJ.n of Ihl. ^ar."",",l, tllO CrOI> ACOllA Ea.emenl Agre....nt (..
defined below).1Id 0Dy doeumcnt.s, co...ot. and/.r tille work relsted 10 the ..."'.
NOW, THEJU.FOlUt. on dl. cowlili.", .<< fo,dtln Ihl. All''''''''', and for good and
v.luabl. CODOidntllm th. le<dpt of wltlcb I. ..knowledged botwetll the p...v.., the part!.. Isree
thaI:
I. ~. The foreaolna roc.kall .... w. and correcl and incorporalo'd h<<eln by
reference.
2. Amemeall to !'rond. Fullll'e Croll /,-- ~ AveemOlll, The pllllel
hereby ack.oowledge 1Ind, tbe partlo.s (as of rho execution of!lUa Agre......t) ero 110110 . poalt!.n
lO noaodale the material and odtellenns and condllloOl of a C!(l.l$ tIC.... ....m'm .graemem to
addres8 bOlh lite New Hope Cross Acau R"'Iulremenu IIId lb. DoIJlllln Ace..... Accordlogly,
New Hope ..d Dolphin aerec that within nlllely (90) days aft.. lbe eJ<plr.tloA of .u ippllII
petiOlI. followlo. Ipproval of Ule lIlt1Olldot.nt ro tile Dolphin SIlO Devclopnlelll PIon by Collier
COUnl)', J'lodda, to work IOgelher in good talth to nOSOllace tho material and other lemlll and
oondlllo", or 0 oro&. ottO.. ea<emeIII .W.....1ll for th. haoellt of New Hop., the New Hope
Property, Dnlph)., .... th. Dolphin Prope,!)' Ib,t 'atl.llt$ the New HqJO Cro.. AcceJI
01/10/2008 16:54 FAX 2393480131
; Fro.: Odvidson EngillBllr:lnll
NEW BOPE MINISTRIES
23S 434 811B4 D1/10/l!OO!J 17: 17
Agendali!lllll1!No. 8B
January Z9, 2008
IIOGtlJEP,fIG21OlI86
1 JaB,10. 2006 4:03PM
PHOENIX ASSOCIATES Of S f INC
No 639)Age,pda,ltem No. 8B
. JamPary 29. 2008
Page 183 of 186
J.t.tRIBrr IIA"
NEW HOPE PROPERTY
Agenda Item No. 8B
.January 29, 2008
Page 184 of 186
New Hope Ministries Lellal Description
The subject property being 39.89,l acres, is located in Section 4, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, and is fully described as:
The West half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 4,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the South 75
feet for purposes of road right-of-way.
The East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 4,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the South 75
fect for purposes of road right-of-way.
Jao, 10. 2008 4:04PM PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF S f INC
No 639tge~dadtem No. 8B
, Januilry 29, 2008
Page 185 of 186
1
,
j
j
~
i.
ItXHIBrr "ll"
OOLPHIN PQOPll.R.TY
JaL 1~ 2008 4:04PM
PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF S f INC
No. 6397 P. 6
0000<0
00000
o~
ON,,-
Z _0
EfJ;g
ill >..,,-
::::rom.
..;:2 ~~:
croo..
(l)~
Ol
--::(
'~
Exhibit "BII