Agenda 05/13/2008 Item #17B
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 13, 2008
Page 1 of 31
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
V A-2008-AR-12951 Irvine Dubow, requesting a 10.7-foot Variance from the
required IS-foot front yard setback of the Vineyards PUD, to allow a 4.3-foot
setback in order to rebuild a pool cage that was destroyed by Hurricane Wilma. The
subject property is located at 5901 Almaden Drive in Section 8, Township 49 S,
Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) consider the above-referenced Variance
petition and render a decision pursuant to Section 9.04.04 of the Land Development Code
(LDC) in order to ensure that the project is in harmony with all applicable codes and
regulations and that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The petitioner is requesting that the BZA consider an after-the-fact Variance of 10.7 feet
from the required 15-foot front yard setback of the Vineyards PUD (Ordinance 85-15) to
allow a 4.3-foot setback in order to rebuild a pool cage that was destroyed by Hurricane
Wilma.
The applicant is the original owner of the single-family home on the subject site, which
had an attached screened cage enclosure when he purchased the property in 1990.
However, while attempting to rebuild the enclosure after Hurricane Wilma, he learned
that permits for the original structure had never been pulled. He also learned that the
enclosure had illegally encroached approximately 6.56 feet into the ten-foot drainage
easement abutting the eastern boundary of the property; and that it had not met the
setback requirement of the PUD, which requires a minimum front yard setback for
accessory structures, such as screen enclosurcs, to be 15 feet. (Since the site is a comer
lot with two frontages, it is considered to have two front yards instead of one).
The applicant filed a Variance request to allow the screen cage enclosure to be rebuilt
with a reduced front yard setback (V A-2007-AR-I 1300), which was unanimously
approved by the CCPC on May 17, 2007. However, due to the existence of the
aforementioned ten-foot drainage easement, the CCPC's recommendation of approval
included a stipulation by staff that the replacement enclosure be reconstructed but not
encroach into the ten-foot drainage easement, which would enable maximum utilization
of the applicant's existing slab foundation while still respecting the limits of the
easement. (The unused portion of the slab, being at grade level, would not have impeded
with the function or maintenance of the easement and, therefore, could remain.)
.-.
On June 26,2007, the Variance petition (Resolution No. 07-171) was also approved by a
unanimous vote from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), subject to what staff
understood as the stipulations recommended by the CCPe. The applicant, however,
.A,genda Item No. 178
May 13, 2003
Page 2 of 31
understood that the BZA had given him approval to "replace" his sereen eage enclosure
in the exaet location in which it stood before the hurricane, since this is what he had
verbally requested at the BZA hearing and had always desired notwithstanding staffs and
the CCPC's reeommendation. Beeause a review of the motion to approve the Variance in
the verbatim minutes of the hearing was unclear as to the BZA's intent (see Attaehment
I), staff deeided that the petition should be sent back to the CCPC and BZA for fmiher
action. However, in the intervening period, the applicant was able to successfully acquire
an Easement Use Agreement from the County allowing him to eonstruct his screen cage
enclosure in the drainage easement. As a result of this Agreement, stan's prior stipulation
prohibiting eonstruction within the drainage easement has become unnecessary and is,
therefore, not included in this Variance request.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
Approval of this Variance petition would have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Approval of this Variance would not affect or change the requirements of the GMP.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
Approval of this Variance would have no affordable housing impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no environmental issues associated with this Variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC did not review this petition as they do not normally hear Variance petitions.
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC heard petition VA-2008-AR-l2951 on May l, 2008, and believing that
approving the Variance would not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the
public welfare, voted unanimously (9-0) to forward this petition to the BZA with a
recommendation of approval. Because this decision was unanimous, and no letters of
objection have been received from the community, this item is being placed on the
summary agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on
which a detemlination by the CCPC and the BZA must be based. The legal
considerations are reflected in the CCPC evaluation of the listed criteria in Chapter
9.04.03 of the LDC. These evaluations are completed and have bcen incorporated into the
Aaenda Item No. 178
" May 13. 2008
Page 3 or 31
attached Staff Report. A swnmary of the legal considerations and findings are noted
below:
. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the
location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved?
. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the
action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property,
which is the subject of the variance request?
. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC work unnecessary and undue
hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant.
. The variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible
the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promote standards
of health, safety, or welfare.
. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special
privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same zoning district.
. Granting the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the LDC
and not be injurious to the neighborhood or othetwise detrimental to the public
welfare.
. There are natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf
course, etc.
. Granting the variance will be consistent with the GMP.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals approve Petition V A-2008-AR-
12951.
PREPARED BY:
John-David Moss, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page I of I
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 4 of 31
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
17B
This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
CommissIOn members. VA-2008-AR-12951 Irvine Dubow, requesting a 10.7-foot Variance
from the required 15-foot front yard setback of the Vineyards PUD, to allow a 4.3-foot setback
in order to rebuild a pool cage that was destroyed by Hurricane Wilma. The subject property
is located at 5901 Almaden Drrve In Section 8, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County,
Florida.
5/13/20089.0000 AM
Prepared By
John~David Moss
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Senior Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development
5/1/20082:33:57 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
5/1/20082:45 PM
Approved By
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Chief Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/1/20084:08 PM
Approved By
.Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
5/1/20086:25 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
5/2/20088:42 AM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
5/612008 1 :07 PM
file://C:\AgendaTest\Export\ 107 -Mav%20 13.%202008\ 17.%20SUMMAR Y%20AGENDA \ 1 ...
5/7/2008
/\oenda Item ~Jo. 1"73
~ May 13, 2008
Page 5 of 31
Co~r County
... --,..........
- - -
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: MAY 1, 2008
SUBJECT: PETITION VA-2008-AR-1295L IRVINE DUBOW
AGENT/APPLICANT:
OWNER/AGENT: Irvine L. Dubow
590] Almaden Dr.
Naples, FL 34119
REOUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) consider a
10.7-foot Variance from the required 15-foot front yard setback, pursuant to Section 3.04 of the
Vineyards PUD, Ordinance 85-15, as amended, to allow a 4.3- foot setback in order to rebuild a
pool cage that was destroyed by HUITicane Wilma.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject propeliy is a corner lot located at 590 I Almaden Drive, Lot 26, Unit I in the Sonoma
Lake subdivision, Section 8, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida (see location
map on the following page).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST:
The applicant is the original owner of the single-family home on the subject site, which had an
attached screened cage enclosure when he purchased the property in 1990. However, while
attempting to rebuild the enclosure after H umeane Wilma, he learned that pennits for the
original structure had never been pulled. He also learned that the structure had illegally
encroach cd approximately 6.56 feet into thc 10-tc)ot d.rainage easemcnt abutting thc eastern
boundary of the property: and that it had not met the 15-foot tront yard setback requircment of
thc Vincyards PUD, which requires minimum front yard setback for accessory structures, such as
screen enclosurcs, to be 15 feet.
Pell/ion '.A.](}07-AR.l.:'951
I'II!;(' I urn
CCPC Dille: .Hay!. ]O()8
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 6 of 31
The applicant filed a Varianee request to allow the sereen cagc enclosure to be rebuilt with a
reduced front yard setbaek (V A-2007-AR-I1300), which was unanimously approved by the
CCPC on May 17, 2007. However, due to the existcnce of the aforementioned drainage
easement, the CCPC's recommendation of approval included a stipulation by staff that the new
enclosure be reconstructed outside of the ten1'oot drainage easement, which would enable
maximum utilization of the applicant's existing slab foundation while still respecting the limits
of the easement. (The unused portion of the slab, being at grade level, would not have impeded
with the funetion or maintenance of the easement and, therefore, could remain.)
On June 26,2007, the Variance petition (Resolution No. 07-171) was also approved by a
unanimous vote from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). It was staff's understanding that the
Variance was approved as recommended by the CCpc. The applicant, however, understood that
the BZA had given him approval to "replace" his screen cage enclosure in the exact location in
whieh it stood before the hurricane, since this is what he had verbally requested at the BZA
hearing and had always desired notwithstanding staff's and the CCPC's recommendation.
Because a review ofthe motion to approve the Variance in the verbatim minutes was unclear as
to the BZA's intent with regard to the CCPC's recommendation or the applieant's request, it was
determined that this petition should be sent back to the BZA for further action. However, in the
intervening period, the applicant was able to successfully acquire an Easement Use Agreement
from the County allowing him to construct his screen cage enclosure in the drainage easement.
As a result of this Agreement, staff's prior stipulation prohibiting construction within the
drainage easement has become unnecessary and is, therefore, not included in this Variance
request.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
NOlih:
East:
South:
West:
Lake, then single-family residential structures, zoned PUD.
Single-family residential structures, zoned PUD.
Single-family residential structure, zoned PUD.
Single-family residential structure, zoned PUD.
Perilion VA-2()()7-AR-12\)5!
PlIge 2 of6
cepc Dale: Marl, 200R
Agenda Item No. 173
May 13, 2008
Page 7 of 31
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IGMPl CONSISTENCY:
The site is located in the Urban Residential Land Use Designation on the County's Future Land
Use Map. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger
issue of the actual use. As previously noted, the subject petition seeks a Variance for an
accessory structure on a single-family home that is located within a single-family subdivision,
which is an authorized use in this land use designation; therefore, the single- family home use is
consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that
the proposed use for the subject site is consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
ANALYSIS:
Section 9.04.01 of the LDC gives the BZA the authority to grant Variances. The CCPC is
advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Subsection 9.04.03 A. through H., in bold font
below, as general guidelines to assist in making a recommendation of approval or denial. Staff
has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions, and offers the following responses:
A. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the
location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
There is no land-related hardship. The lot is situated in a platted, developed Planned Unit
Development. The uses of the subject property are allowed, and there is a minimum 15-
foot front yard setback for acccssory screen enclosurcs. Absent this Variance approval, the
petitioner would still have a rcasonable use of the property.
B. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action
of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the
subject of the variance request?
Yes. As noted above, the BZA approved a Variance without clearly articulating its intent.
Nonetheless, the applicant has now obtain cd an Easement Use Agrecment that permits
construction of the screen cage enclosure within the easement. Therefore, staff does not
object to the requested 10.7-foot Variance. In addition, the applicant is the original owner
of the single- family residence, which contained the pool cage enclosure upon his purchasc
of the property from Coastal Construction in 1990. The applicant assumed that thc cage
enclosure had been permitted with the house, but it ncver was. Therefore, the condition is
pre-existing.
C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary
and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
If this Variance is not approved, the largest screen cnclosure the applicant would bc
ablc to install would be approximately 260 square feet, which is less than half the size
of the existing concrete patio slab. Consequently, more than 50 percent of the unused
slab would rcmain, thereby creating a practical difficulty for the applicant.
Petition IA-]()IJ7-AR-/~Y5!
f'ugc 3 olfi
("('PC Dare: :\1{/l'!,]O()/i
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 8 of 31
D. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of
health, safety and welfare?
Yes. The Variance proposed would be the minimum Variance to allow reasonable use of
the existing lanai with a cage enclosure; and as the prior screen enclosure existed on the
site for at least 15 years without complaint or issue, approval of this Variance would not
have a negative impact on standards of health, safety and welfare.
E. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege
that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in
the same zoning district?
Yes. A Variance by definition confers some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations
specific to a site. However, no similar Variances have been granted in this immediate
neighborhood.
F. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare?
Yes. The proposed Variance would allow the applicant to construct a screen enclosure,
which is an appurtenance enjoyed by many of the applicant's neighbors. Approval of this
Variance would not have an injurious effect upon the neighborhood, nor would it be
detrimental to the public welfare. As noted above, the proposed enclosure would replace
the previous screen enclosure, which existed for] 5 years on the site without complaint.
G. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses,
etc.?
Yes. The subject property is a comer lot and the area for which the Variance is being
requested abuts a drainage easement, lake and then a roadway that dead-ends at the end of
the petitioner's lot. Therefore, the screen cnclosure would not have an impact on the only
neighbor to the west.
H. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
Approval of this Variance petition would not affcct or change the requirements of the
GMP.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC does not nonnally hear Variance petitions and did not hear this one.
Pelition VA-20()7-AR-12iJ51 Page 4 q(6
cepe Dale: May 1. 200N
Agenda !tem No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 9 of 31
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning and Land Development Review staffrecommends that the Planning Commission forward
a recommendation of approval of petition V A-200S-AR-12951 to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
/'eririoll VA-21!07-AR-1295!
!'age 5 0(6
CC/'C Vale: .lorn)' I, :008
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 10 of 31
PREPARED BY:
JOHN-DAVID MOSS, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
JEFFREY A. KLATZKOW DATE
CHIEF ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
RAY BELLOWS, MANAGER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUSAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
Tentatively scheduled for the May 13,2008 Board of County Commissioners Meeting.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
DATE
Periliol1 VA-2007-AR-12951
Pllge 6of6
("CPC Dale: A/a)' 1. 20()f!
(;)
J\genda Item No. 17B
May 13, 2008
Page 11 of 31
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING 8< LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION
(VARIANCE FROM SETBACK(s) REQUIRED FOR A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT)
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
To be completed by staff
Above to be completed by staff
APPUCANT/AGENT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPUCANT(S)
\ ' I, "
'i-( \, I Iv 'c-
L, U, L,"
ADDRESS
\ r, , I ~ h
11 V CITY I\f\ \-if STATE \ i. ZIP "II i '{
). r", CELL'# :hi .'';:;1-'" i i 7 FAX # ; '. v....,~, -
, ..,
J -I
(:, ;~i .j. ~'
":. )'<) q g
".,r-r.
1\ ': (,. ,t '. \
'1'11 1'.1 '\/'\U>I,'
TELEPHONE # .'.1>
, ,
, )
~
Ld'
-
ADDRESS:
"
NAME OF AGENT
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE #
CITY
CELL #
STATE
ZIP
FAX #
Variance ApplicatiDn rev. 12/23/04
Page I of 10
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 12 of 31
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE
YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THESE REGULATIONS.
ASSOCIA nONS
Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. Provide additional
sheets if necessary.
n LA--Ie'L S
NAME Of HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: .Jo NON fir
1WM8n~ u ~tt<<;, Iksoc.
MAILING ADDRESS ~tOl &NnA &.t:1-t (21) CITY .B,l-.Il~A- <;~TATE~
ZIP ~4\3S: i'pll\~(;..'""'"
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
ZIP
CITY
STATE
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
ZIP
CITY
STATE
NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIATION:
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page 2 of 10
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
1\"-1~lnda 11em r,,)o. 173
STATE_ZW '.~J> 13, 2003
Page 13 of 31
I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Legal Description of Snbjcct Property:
SectionITownship/Range D-*-..d..L Property
1.0.#: (1f'XX!O 1 $1 ~ n:J (I) I L\ ~'f
Subdivision:fO WM 1+ LA-\( t.. Unit
Lot:
2 (p Block:
Metes & Bounds Description:
Acreage
Address of Snbject Property (If different from Petitioner's address):
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning
Land Use
N~
S PU j)
E~
W ?U \L
~?-S\ U'i-~\\ M-
~ I
1/
Minimum Yard Reauirements for Subiect Property:
Front:
Comer Lot: Yes 0 No 0
Waterfront Lot: Yes 0 No 0
Side:
Rear:
NATURE OF PETITION
Provide a detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is
proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page 3 of]O
I ,- Len..)\.' ,.<.'<- '- L)l. "/- '-'''T' v",
f"o-) rY LJ
Fo 1<-
-T~ 11,'L - NO'" s: 0- If. V:tel )qtJ( L
"
f\" 0 K \..I\JlL'f L
J
(l-c I< 1'1, ,--
Agenda Item ~<o. 178
10 c' -rfv1Effl-1-3(-l20Cl8
Page 14 of 31
'T' \-\i
S ETt~ik: I<' S
/+l'il)
G' NC(2-U Ik 1+ MG f\J ..
:iI I (
>
kJlLL
l::;> L
et2-9V'I)1.b r:!,'1 Tl+L /3-..pI)~UI)~JA-\1.. '~Jf"i\-Jc;- <:,~f=-
trL~ 0 TIT7: I'G: I~ ,...) IT NJ [\.1 8 ,;;, k'.
Tl-t( ~{\JCK-Oft-<:IiI"'GNr CVA-fJ-.IA--Nc..~j.M r~i- 4vl~.E. IJ 10 O,'2-P,R
'V ,2,.''llJ Ilk t.. III e C A-6 [ it J5' 0 r2 (':; I ..... ;+-1 I '1 \'s (..0 I L. '\ i 'r- I S
\ 1'1 \Jp,2- ifrlJ' Tv r0 OTC..', \ 1"-1 '\ H--c \ b '-i R<-;>. cj r ,Q.., S I Ih: N C
N v f\ltt' I C \+t\ v' .( \ A-'-"5 oc 1/+-, I D ,,j r~-'1 G r" 6' ~(;: 1+ ~ (u 1'-1 ! ') 11'1-11'/'
uK. 'iVI.f\J 1"1!?N\1tllJi.\J [Y-..I5>1'tI0LC ,.JrjIL I)Lttc-L'1tS;'(v'r L}~
J C \'1' G[ . Tp--IWl-~ I ( d-f1:j N"~ V (~ \.,(H tJ I N T"- i<, -Pt' (~R {I) vJ I Ti-I--,
\+tE LDc r\-T[ Ii r-J U ~ ",[1...(, ~'~-V\y)'[ d. LCI I U F 'lfH (Jp.1J ),'!-[{2.r,
i 1 ^ CoP-tJ'i..r:L LCT["! 51 R4\'L (, \ (n III'/ L .)( itrt I) ,j
S I TV A-niJ fl, It l) ~Jt:l ~N \) (jv ~ CUL- Ih -~ f1-f A-tJ D \Un,
fJ D l \ M t:' i N G 'L () Q. CON F L \ C (- vJ \ T1-\ rH L tf--p f:lt ft..r2 It..
()~T( t~ f'J {, I (, Ii Be R H'(iD 1-'::> I 'j /::(,(-l-i:'F) cOg r<..{ SID oj r5 .
LoVW TY
\ T LJ [I LI LI) I\-~ P E f+(~ 1'1+ n- C TH C \1f'?UEI,n-.^ f}r2ucr s S
\'> \)v'flJIt..I-\I-r-:,G -n+L O,ibtlvJ's Fo(2.,!'vo -\--Ai;'!..';
. I ,11/0 t I N'\L Ff AS' /'r".) CL (}-( /~(d
urTf\'tII~ D~..JIJ 1* J-i.. Ii /.
..' " 1 j:" [) +R ~ p( . G\;r l0l--J ~i ~ \;J U'1 '\)t/ N uH
1\\ls+rrt> At...{'t ,"c . . 7, DC (:0 TPI20DJhtfh,:,1-':..it-lJ51"li
, UAVL Yoy~..t-\{2 uL.>~. 'T ." (,'~
4-N 1)'10' ( ii-TV 2J. . lU,j iT ,tkc I 0 f..~' ,.(;)~:::: 1'1,+ r .!~ (, 1:.
e'l-:- >-(\.[) tv Ii o( \""")1"//
,i r-, I'_de k.CtJl-Ip/rf;Ljl ~;G j.;lSi/RJi(lJC'f_ ,::}- 1"'-- ,,-,'..1 ,..~
t.v I, HI. _, 1l:,ljIJt+/~t;:iVi
/__, _', ;\ CcJ 10 tRA( TV/~_ A-'i Pi i;; I (ME, &'J Ii) .. _/ .. ," " (;
LJ~ ~Ii'vjj It ,_-' I). '/1('-1, M I-j," ) i:::-'''0C'0 N
--f .. . ".PFIClENI ';r'L}'l/I/lrT'c v' j ../ v
J T-').r!v,/I!IL,.. ?(, .
[; NJ J cf-f 1<-ft
{~NTi~,~ ~ If
. h d wh'" . aI Aoenda ite'll..t;Q. 178
25' to 18; when property owner pure ase property; en eXIsting pnnclp structure '^;~rrJI,1':z008
(include building permit number (s) if possible): why encroachment is necessary; how~itingof 31
encroachment came to be; etc.
For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02. provide detailed description of site
alterations. including any dredging and filling.
LfW~1 rile'>.. QU/U1R--U\ - ~\ctHVr lJILt1Ji.- (jeT LyviOrif(q~
~'0P~ ~",)kl~.' !~vl1jt L,llub?lIJ d" l, LJ-. ril-J ll0bvt-J
lVTi ~. U..~ L~ f.Juv' 1'3 \01 (l'
It.! co! 10,,; 7 I pp I tJOv. iqo,
('ONSTi4'c..XlJ 'tf'1 C;J~ InAfSif2-\JC:l'I Of,f III WL'l".-,..::rL. .- ~&~
'FlvL1 G",'JITR.IlLTIO),} ~ u(2-, - Olt.'[ /-.0 PL ~ N()V'I~~
VPDN Tfr,J< I N6 I<CS"/fJ<i4JC'l, P" l? (otJTRAcr~tfT CLJ~TRM1
_~QU/~(D It- ~I\ ~D Vn-e.\~C~. .q:--ROM CouuYi'
J)v hrJ(J.! IS fk.<'f)MFD SA--M E. .
Please note that staff and the Collier County Planning Commission shall be guided in their recommendation to
the Board of zoning Appeals, and that the Board of zoning appeals shall be guided in its determination to
approve or deny a variance petition by the below listed criteria (1-8). (Please address these criteria using
additional pages if necessary.)
I. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size
and characteristics of the land, structure. or building involved.
911" ALl:i81~6A\J 0 (( \ ~ AT ');,.JOM A- ikA1<'<i:S '\XWL{)PJA-v,,:;t
:4 T r--I-k.- (rJ 'IT P-S ~ CT 100 0-( Ll ~~M()fLC [IV "'- I\-LH-ll-J)VL\. J~
Ull~~ /HZ- L4-I<L ~V~'.Jh Tl~;::r ~(:' 01-=- ~+z {t-oUS[.
LI_'VfS?~J2..RJ IS tt5_'it-JD_~_Lt;~ ~v_,iI..!G 11+(
L~.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the
applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the
variance request.
JJo 0<-. W ~Dr uCR.... .
(
G<t:1 A ViW-, ~
n-k- G rJ/12.Ae TV i2-..
DK ~ ('>;,LDZ:.
:r fft L {//\ IV
PE72N(;]
Variance Application rev. 12123/04
Page 4 of 10
,,',~ ~V~...' t ~''-'---~ ~[J'LJ-
~ Ff KIln- (1. . 1-'-
. Vtif!lll? V!)N ~ .Agenda Item No. 178
1 .' \ I) t; .... t .. May 1~' 9.G?
I..... f () 1<. '" t' {<. [1\T'6--E--. "Vr:;.t-tfMe 1 ~
\"'Fil> 'f"i:: i= '(
1'--' ,+.... l I ~ \.-V \ \ r \ - 1<- f4.- F'-- .-
\ It
~'-\~ l cU" I v'~ L,01:'5 N Cl
l\;:~ N{)Ji- CJt...-;:; :\
\'-" ,\+;, 1'1 1\ '" I" L i-L
'vU;T/otJ}. - P '1 "i; lo--
(~Nj.
4J IJ-r-J ctre> (, f' ~A-r.( IA..,J I +Lt (Af:l.( &.. "'l ,J, 10 F 4- l,/ I F'''L
vJ 1+0 ~ (..i r'FS: 12 '> F .Q[,..i,'vl [t-, n J AL L He I IV) c:= t:l <, I) I) ~. IT":' 'L (r
{I, (] 0'/ IW IHJt>:; f) Igv t-< D'2.~ fIJ O~- Gpt. 4/ (1:.24'17 uP il &' rJ ~
15 (T NOI \-tl\.1.E"'~Tt'-CoM(~';~l"i>Lf l)/)Lu5S t+
GR/wi)FArl-k>tl'>. C'L.t-4.{/SE? IT fl.I,+I) r~[ \UU 1/).-1''-:
Fa 1-2 (lil ~ 8u T \ T i'-1 1+'1 16: LI O'L TI+ I$, [3 LJ j.:;) 0[ N 011)
t:---vrvI2L VzofLt:', ~r f-U<f\.lL'-( ~2LI Z vz rHAI
~'cJiv.-E t::!'{L\ Lr=:- ~ Ihh)L1) I~L Kf.,\jJfClPl)LLY 0/5C'0')5EI:
It0 A- T-~{);:n-Hr-2.t6t+r 1'--1 ftN 10 'i.-I( ,+f,.I) \5 T~+"L-
T-/I"-IE:: f-\tJeJ jt.t;' f+8JJfl?_N-(~ L,( {to/LI"iIZ (o(nJ'(Ll
(0 \\1i"1 \) '> I OI'-..J (. Id> \:> \i-l~ I:.h Iki:.
/"
~g1f. p, ~ 6-(lt)
I!.{!J.JI rl IN ~ 7i+-c tJvbow<; ~(F/}.f!J"~~~~~
~ ~ Ie t4--L f.- N C:/v'/7?r-L l)f2fJJ ~J--U~ C:;. ~ge 17 of 31
~ I J..)~ 0 c( tJ I (3 Lf ~ r--fl-1J /J~, Be; I Al G U N-F' I tl2L l.(J
U7\1JTJc;.\Z.- ~ OC \ N &- Pl1 A.J( .s bJd). .- em IJ \. - S~ p~ ~
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue
hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant.
'f{.S.' 'I LS " '<f.H I ft
_( c, V (\1 D (] l~ D'i r-.9lL '-f
o R A-ND-f R- H+tR Is
~j-( \ --'L- IJ1J 5 iAJ0Q
(L-Ft-\J.s 'L
4. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health. safety or welfare.
o I=-- GJLJR-S <t. .
5. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by
these zoning regulations to other lands. buildings. or structures in the same zoning district.
W 1+t1 1+ t t2 f.d..1J I) F Ii- T f-k/21
DISCUSS ~ 0 ' I AJ D'C<00
IAf< L q; A--fL- -c OJ::' r If-{., P (/ f3 LI C
\,f\--F~ (A)'I-!-u vvOUL- D / I /.Jv R I~
\ '"\ \4-B-P?
Po 7S I BL'1
(l--MC, L- r l-J-o uL \) ~'L
f() R Tr+-v-.t7\k 1=0TV(Lf.,
M ~ if--k
W w.v vJOv L I~
(/+fIT
I~
6. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
'jf/iJ2.-<f_ d ItB <; () LU rrL L1 i D l.. -F.HJ I J"Z LLJ N (J i1f-IIJ (y
17) ('4U57 ij..-A1dMJ ItJ..rUILLr rJLJ~ IkJ(Dfl)VUV/'lAl(L
17; ~ \ 'II Cpr) 12 r; \ 'tI.. t; 1+<'0:1,/ PH/lJtJ c) R- iR-A>Ff:"/ (' -f'-
N LrJtC . r' 0 N<e (iJI,..{ If'. ui-uJ r- I tV [(xi- L{ 0#12 s / J J u+ t't (' I CZ tJ (
o ^'P 'oSeJ/L/.. or- Iv'nC QSkJ,QcJ{C :::rMoQt11}c'c
hI M<'/Vf> l r0 S:J PPOR-I'
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves. lakes, golf course, etc.
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page 5 of 10
NO I ,J () d-. tJ 0 -
j214451Q)--f I~ Ot \
:Cf'~J{7;;ct21JMIWf~ VI!, ~,~r:!".d~B
f) . Y 1G(r.dll.08
W'1 (JAJL! df2JJ)/J"?RlCf. Page18of31
8. Will granting the variance be consistent with the growth management plan.
-MtJi. V~ !J () , I J ( S FI4-1 R Af.IJ () Iv <; r
:::tn c, p JhJ~ ~ '/..4-/2-! A--A Jcr . A.t.A1.JJ I Ic:JH{J
J\lf<; II N-vR-T'<AI-.H) No {8YR1-11<; lbfJC.
::::]TU1}r (Jfltr/rLJ fK '1uu w MJI (U Sf --r-R-~.
BE ADVISED THAT SECTION 10.03.05.B.3 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES
AN APPLICANT TO REMOVE THEIR PUBLIC HEARING SIGN (S) AFTER FINAL ACTION IS
TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. BASED ON THE BOARD'S FINAL
ACTION ON THIS ITEM. PLEASE REMOVE ALL PUBLIC HEARING ADVERTISING SIGN(S)
IMMEDIATELY.
VARIANCE PETITION
(VA) APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER
LISTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
#OF NOT
REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED
Completed APolication (download from website for current form) 15
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page 6 of 10
lication meetin notes
15
I
15
I
I
2
I
5
I
I
~I"r~:....
~, -.:; ~ I t Jo. 1178
,11 0 08
P 19 of 31
v'
/
3
t./
FEES:
D Pre-application Fee $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app
meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be
required.)
Review Fees:
D $2000.00 Residential
D $5000.00 Non-Residential
D $2000.00 Sign Variance
D After-Th...Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions 2x the nannal petition fee
D $760.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee . eepc Meeting
D $363.00 Estimated Legal AdvertiSing Fee. Bee Meeting
(any over- or under-payment will be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples
Daily News).
D $2500.00 EI5 ReVIew
OTHER REQUIREMENTS,
o
o
o
Agent/Owner Signature
Date
P 7 U) (0
(i)
AFFIDAVIT
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 20 of 31
We/IX 7~, i-- ~ L~uIY sworn, depose ond say that we/I am/are the owners of the
property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers fo the questions in this
application, including the disclosure of interest information, 011 sketches, data, and other supplementary matter aftoched to and
mode 0 port of this applicationl are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the
information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer
generated or County printed shall nof be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed
complete, and 011 required information has been submitted.
As property owner We/I further authorize ~"V~:~~. ;, 9 ;/.);)'/0/ to act as our/my representative
in on moHers reg rding this Petition.
~ LJ~--vV'
Signature of Property Owner
J RVlt!. L. \Ju bai0
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
~lLLlfI.1j \Ju bow
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this IA day of ~ ~
pf{ + ~ ,Dl~ who is personally known to me or has produced
. 20o!1 by
identification.
as
State of Florida
County of CoWer
,~~~':-~'~'::t:'" '"
_-,.~."c,.,~"., "'""ll '\ 'DB'
~.. 1,"- ": ~Jt;'r.J. I.';J y
:: . iI,}':; > Y Ur,ll(' ~'.
';;'cr,_. ~\:''',', ; !'.rlv C')n-" ,'",a(e of F"/o'"'da
~.YF~~"'P " ..- ,1<>,'..1'",,-_,. "
<'~;;'.~~"r;',;.;';> - ;~~rf!S ,iuI28, 2009
20:' ., JD4?3i31
~>..~.~,.-'.':i!!::-.:i.;li,r;._,..,~.
"i.I<~"{;+",.....~
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notory Public)
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page2of4C
ADDRESS1"'lG CHECKLIST Agenda r::~~ 110266~
Paoe 21 of 31
Please complete the following AND FAX (239-659-5724) OR SUBMIT TN PERSON TO THE ADDRESSING SECTION. FORM
MUST BE STGNJ:.I> BY ADDRESSING PERSONNEL PRIOR TO PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. Not all items will apply to
every project. Items in bold type are required.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
S:/rJ t.1 MA-- Lf} WI.-- VrJ (\ I [-Dr Lb
FOLIO (Property 10) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
(yJ(,v07Z,1)~IIJO ILH~C;
STREET ADDRESS OR ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
,,-qui (UHMi"iIJ I')rt !JIVPLH .t;'L-
NI\Cf
LOCATION MAP, showing exact location 01 project/site in relation to nearest public road right.ol-way (attach)
COPY OF SURVEY (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable} ~p I (}G.... SC ~'i: >J <'~1JCl..{)<;,,7R..{'! v"; \ '\ 001.-
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJECTSISITES ONLY), SDP
orAR-
Petition Type - (Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type)
DSDP (Site Development Plan) 0 PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
o SDPA (SDP Amendment) 0 PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
o SDPI (SDP Insubstanliel Change) 0 FP (Final Plat)
o SIP (Site Improvement Plan) 0 LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
o SIPI (SIPllnsubstantial Change) 0 BL (Blasting Permit)
o SNR (Street Name Change) 0 ROW (Right-ol-Way Permit)
o Vegetation/Exotic (Veg. Removal Permits) 0 EXP (Excavation Permit)
o VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit) 0 TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
o Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use, Boat Dock Ext., Rezone, PUD rezone, etc.)
o Other - Describe:
Project or development names proposed lor, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if applicable; indicate whether
proposed or existing)
Please Check One: 0 Checklist is to be Faxed Back 0 Personally Picked Up
Applicant Name:(i:dl .;1.. L. D v b (I vJ PhoneJVt -1,S?, .,NRFax ,Hi -'), \'5-/;<7'18
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project andlor Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing
Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONL Y
Primary Number
Address Number
Address Number
Address Number
'i 6-if fD
Approved by
Variance Application rev. 12/23/04
Page 10 of to
Date
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 22 of 31
,J!:,.--...."l';"tlaf.
.~.~~......
DOC .' .'
l)INT- .:. '.. WARRANTY OEEO
I ~. 5 IND_ sot... :
Recol'.dliw-:,::>'_",:;-, '
Ilctc s~::3~'l:S\) d
'1'II1S.....~;:DDD Made the ",f'T day of v May A.D.
Bap~,~~re. Limited Partnership, A North Carolina
P~t8h1PI qualified to do business in the State of
rlc,~4i_,/":})y, Palisades Properties. Inc.. A Delaware
c~~~~ Its General Partner
""
C>
~ :il
co
.... is
..
.... ...
~ c:
m
U'> ,..
....
<<> :z:
"- ::>
'"
t.>
0:> c:
""
.,.., ::;
....
C> C
...
Vl
,,~
"".
'"
.~
..
.,
~i ~
.- ~:
~~~.r~
-:"! ,..:;:>
~- ~~ i-;
3';;;13.
'T'
....
....".1:
....:'H.-,,.~.,;
/\aenda Item f'.jo. 178
~ May 13. 2008
Page 23 of 31
0""
:;0""
1990 \1M
Limita t.n
0'"
::><<<>
c-t'?',,:;'.. .,
herei~;~~iCalled the grantor, to
X....1JiJIL';o_ and LJ.l.Uan Dubov. JOIIlT TENANCY
whoae:poata'<<1~e ad.dres8 19 7220 you: A'lEMUE SOUTH '325, EDINA, MIHNESOTA 55435
herein-ce:lled-the grantee,
whotae,SOc14:1Secur1 ty Nwllber is
("he:o~~USed herein the terms Ilgrantorn and "grantee"
Ineludet~a11 the parties to this in8tr~ent and the heirs,
legiU->~reeentatives and assigns of individuals, and the
sucoeasors'and assigns of corporations)
=>
o
~
C> ""
en ""
WITnssns::._Tbat the grantor. tor and in consideration of the
sua of$lp.OOand other valuable considerations. receipt whereof
i8 here~~cknowledged, conveys and confirms unto the ~rantee,
all thatoer~a!n land situate in COLLIER, County. Florida, vi::
Being- all of
the
Seal I By: Palisades Properties, Inc., A
Delaware Corporation, Its General
~ 5 Partner j
/ . , ___ By/ d!t(,4t
/ . . fl"...J",_ William V. Roberts
. .....----:--~ (Cff..EJ2.t1/1..... President
Received $ ~2-cl. ~O nocumentarv Stamp Tall
Class ~C" Intanei~le
Received $ JJ / IT- Personal Property T 3to
CO\.l.IER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
By(]P.I~J. _...IA~ J6. Pi"'..J,.~' O.c
001529
OR BOOK
f\Q.endalt~m No. 17B
"'1i"'.,.'.;",i!fli'l1' 13, 2008
Page 24 of 31
~.
001302
PAGE
STATB OP NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly
authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid
to take aCknowledgments, personally appeared
WILLIAM V. ROBERTS, AND PATRICIA 3. FERGUSON PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY' OP PALISADES PROPERTIES IHe., a Delaware
Oorporatlon. GeD~~~l Partner of Haples Ventures Limited
Partnership, a/ei~11na Limited Partnership,
respectively ot the corporation named as grantor. in the foregoing
deed. and that they severally acknowledged executing thesame
in the presence of two, subscribing witnesses treely and voluntarily
under authority duly, vested in them by said corporation and that
the seal affixed thereto 1s the true corporate seal of said
corporation.
....--:..WITNESS my hand
;~~a~~.atoresa1d this
~:f:~;~~~~':"~:.~:,.,.>,<~
{'~~{~.OTAR :>\\~\.,/"
~ .. ~ . c.'O?( SEhL i
. ,"'/'UD1-I<-;',.-'
~'.?~~;.;~....~:~~:~:;;/ '.'
.,,,,,,.,1.1.....l:nstrUlDe
apd official geal in the County and State
./ 10th day of..... Hay. A.D. 1990.
<;;?dxu','~ Ii. f}M<'~ ./
Notary Public. .
My Co_18i111on Explres:/9/16/92
anO~"~~
'II~~ilPo!Io~IOjt,
",QI1COUt-l11,n [II'"
~E.~c.G\\.l.,.(.l
""",
oA ~'l.-o.JI(GU) Llsf"
d 1\-t:1C R C J- L- '
D '<>1.,<0.' , 'fC'" A '-<1 'i 1 M-n IYM J () (.>
1< S'"'111 1M J}1)6 N Die.
/..! 4T2.JJ 1 M.l...J
C \5 ~ Ll ('i i2 M(}/2-"l. LrJ
~N\?..G1 T
C I >9 I Ia f0--!'\ A'\) 1--\1 V P--
~ \2.~a I ~ \ '1 L l \ v!~\'" {J (1L L-tJ
))IW \, 6 '- l '>'11 0 fl-1- M M)'vlJ (J"
I
)il+F [<, DR M, S <;'111 L, '" R'" IL ~ L'"
~fo \j~ >, rJ I \, ~ \l 'i'! I ~ L, ,,,I' '" eL L N
):!~'\Z ,1< Ib J L, v, kMOILe [N '
I{tWlll> , le"!'r I f'Lf [, {de/'1 vi< L L;J ,
L" " Tfl pQ M 1'1 N C', M s' ~o q (UJl 1ifJ"'{'.f 0 I~
r.
/<;10 Clo N '\"-1) 12 j 1'1 \-<{ ~ q 4L M I1-1l [(J LVi "
f'1~ (~ C' i1 ';10 j [to',,, 111 K' LtJ "
("IJ ,<'IT tJ '1, ), F:' I q [, "'" 11111 A-S LrJ 'I
N-cI<J,,,J, P \~ I i I VzJI.ntf'LLN II
No LI' ( J' '" iJ ) (i 0 [, V1: R Nil" [-IJ I,
yJ I'l' C I..! \ 1(' , i':;> ~ c,'cW J {,l-U'I i1- DoN b 1'-- Ij
eii1Y<[\A, I Q )~1b 41j'l~jlliJ DR '
PI< \ Sv\~f WGG"~€\Ll \''} js' rjUi i\jJ z N 0 Q "
R(l!ZO, \(~ ~ )If<{ Ld'iPIlt{J{ U '
/!t1S . <Z J '3 11J [I V'i(!110K~ LtJ "
j)~Z~ , ''0 (lr \/, N'lLj r\-R~5 (W D 'I
.Po "" " A ~\ (gsoc 10 S {\1'& Il- ~. "
C PM'!' fo1G<1Wl\fT\ \ <>11, \ 19" I T ~ I',< 4< # (,UI, - 'IS,,,,, T Pc S'fRI U I-
:vI-- s'-\- \ :ss.-
~ - 151- 0 '!'Agenca liem r,o. 178
,I;'1ay 13, 2008
rage 25 of 31
tJ fye L (c/\
N ~US +1.-
,t
"
v
11
I,
1\
~PR-17-2006 03:24 PM
-~~~~;",
E'RUt.I-::, S-. I::PUI-IS
:::.: 3'''';'e.3~-'3 1 '5
.
>
SKETCH
SURVEY I
OF
J
'~E
S
I
"
~-----
-
c ;:(;'
,
".
"
~'"
'"",
'--
r----
","'-~, !-~:::
........... Lorn 109 12 ~t .....
~..... (vccuPlro) ~~
~/~;~~/ "
r.... /""0 /';r-.
~ -f'';-j'.J.." ,I..........
. /.,a 0-1> l;J
if <>~l<' 'f) r::;z,~ 5
'# "'e- I
r; ('.-j.,.".f.'<"-i> '/
h, ,~/I:
/~""," ~'fr7?- 1/1
...-......., I / /"'"~:!"/"< ~ II
" lr/. ..' "4J-K4L::"""'" I I I
'0"" "t>."'~ I I.
/~". .......... ,,~~~ /;
/_ -.9:.,. ,~_--'
, O"~ '- '- I
/~. - ~.(" '~I
'. I '<s, J"~ ..;,~
. '":'-~:~5>;';-?<"c ~'B8'
~y~'<:~~~:' ~~~ c~~
,..-.....;:>.-"'f.o~ '?'.....
~... 1';/;"" ~+"
,,&,~ s" v....,. ~ ah~
~4--fZ~ ;.i \)....~ '17J;~"
'vc c":>. "'4 ,,-
#"',I'.{' !;-j
"J'.....
TRACT 1..4
~.
eo'
LEGENO
, ~'"
, ..~
r.F."'.
ff'K.J
eo
-
~.~.~
FL<
(~)
:r)
u:
.,
ca.
H
a.~ P.~
".;.R
~N
~
u;~
,~
UI'
~.'C
,.
Q f.JU~O C""""~R "~u,",,~t
.;:) <~u..b !/I. 'Il<:ll ~ClIl
4 'UUlt(' ~J!' lfli)ll ~oo
"0.,."'" ~...Kf;1l ."'<:Po.."", ~'IO u;~
"~'''a~
"~"'::
9E~"'.""" """'""" .00~t
.ROP.:i~(lIo<"'-~_\f""",,
~~=
'c>,
~."~;T, !.U"'~I
m..:~...&<: ~.~t"(IlT
CCM ~l\JRS' [A~~"L'''
........NAHC!: USF:"~'"
O~"JL 'OtH P.~PO\.l'" ~.:iil'l<C'"
~"'-"}.(l!'L
'-.(II'IU",,'lt
.. C--","QJI
'0<''''""''''
~..~, '" ~-''''
~1O~~..o lUV.l,OIl
u:.u <". ~UrlOl!.,T
.,~ c:>/.:otn",
r.Al'''_.<1IX>
<0
'OC"'t-",,".;>,>
"-<".to..;
'~
-'''"''--..,
"
/
/
~
II
~/I:/
if;:
tli~
~:I .
vy \!~
.~
.
/
/
,
"'"
"
."-..,
/
, I
"y'
/'-,,,>
'".
v
t:&BIJ.CIML.1JJ.:.
~
!,
i,.r
~.liQPFRTY DE~CP.[PXJ1lJi..
/'~
1":"4'
.t!.JllE.S-i
l.'); ~~ . $ct,C'I.l'" _.'rE I,;(',,~ I, A 5li9CNISI:)N
~i~rp~N; i~ ~[-~{;'11~~~ilc~1f5ORJEE~.rtjtlo~~?+. 'f~OflI~A
D.';1'; Of SI.'''vEY, IoIAACH lC. ~OOG
NOT VMJ!l 'MT!1Ot,1T \HE "'GNUUR( ""I!) mE DRIGl"l~ RlJ5Ji.D
SE.....(;KAfLC\ItID..UCl:NSlCSUR'<t:YOA".-NDIoII>J"P(1'I
'.., f!t.RJ,<';s ShCllt; "tRl'ClIoI I\CF[I! YG ....E :o:N"'FP.LIf.;~ or .'.....A!:>tl.' Mlv(
..~ E!Ei/.c ~. ~!l'~ll'~'- ~
,~
1.1 HS "~,~PSR..~ S Sue..le: 1(; EASEI.!(N1S. F;:~SEfWk'l()H OR
'lE~TRI~-;]l"'~ ,:>r Ht::O"~
C.' OI",;.NS'O',:: SHO"1'< rlERCCJ'; .~~ ;~ F~~- AND JtC"".....s "l1lHtor
..: '>b ~~Cf'~...'T,.. ~S;~ All ...1[A U ~0 ~,p[C1A~ 'lOJO 11"'l"~O
~.., It.<P"lO\'f."~'l~S C.'HE;R lHM; lHLlS( SHCfitj HAIlS <<C. ..t..1i I.L.lCATlD
sc...,
'._ze'
,/
~
I
/
../
/
/
/
/
p _ ",,::;:.
I
I
/
/
-
J.~.
/
I'
-----~
I
/
~.--c_
C""J1CEI.!lFlllNS.I"LS
"L trRl1FIC"lt ~O ~l\ZD
IRVINE DUBOW
SPECIAL
PURPOSE
~.,..
0.9.8
~:~~~~.
~ ~IUL..J--"'_
J(~!N..wIo H401 (tU tHo - HC6
c, \ _i:G^-. ]CSc.[i."70t-.. Sl'''''dED ~v cur..l
APR 17,2006 16:44
2392632315
Agenda item No. 17B
May 13. 2008
Page 26 of 31
. Ull.Dr~
Page 2
.
..
.A::;enda Item No. 178
~ May 13. 2008
Page 27 of 31
..........~
...... \.~ __ ..'::":I'.. ; <Ad.
. i;\d
2.- ~\\
--:J\ \OO~
~c\
.
.0 ~.. \ I.J\.SV~c..e..
C. ~ e".c.-.(.
? "JV..^.t2.
r\::;>eA
~ ~ \Jo,.y', &vcAc..E?
~f?4 CA.h~
3.- CeM.kcJ-- ~.\~ S ~\.:-..':.\-1 e..
~30' GB S5 +0 b(l'.4~ ~. C\.'ff\i~.,..
*' G--v\ a-.M ~ "FfoZ.( u..?0\'"'1..(. ~--tL..e..
Ce-v;.\,.~ . .
LJ. ~ ~k~ Li~.~~ ....'B.~ke.\l.~e
.2,1;:,'~5~~ ... h.... o..q..-t~. \,'I<;;'~
oi V\e.\ 0\..\.9-r-s ~....u.e.~ ...... tv. .~
-'~ t~,:U ~. v\~~.~.ic ~
.1-.1 \;l'\ "
. ~....~L..t.",__..... ,,~\ ~ ~. . C "
.'.C. ...-_....._. '!::.;..Ll... ..~.L,"_"_.,_,__,~.~_,~,,,,,~._,,,___",
..:;'.'";r
''1
"-f"
;
l
.,Z.
-"", /P""'-., ':::b _ I
'. jf' I - '-. .:~--fr
.........(.~- /.a:,.~,"""--..... r,.-..,"-~ J'''' /
~~. I -..../ . ':r-,"lr-)"('!( ').
._" / Ill"'..... ....-1r~;;-'-. ,-'+
~~" "..../~~~~~~-;' j'
v"'.~"'~' . '_...~,~-.;:-_
(~~ ~':'''' /
.~' -c:t-'-........--/
...... c r -~---~......1
.A ',,-- $- ., .,,?; _
"Y(", Y , ',,:,
'""': -""Vo.... i::':
~,~. ~~(-);..~b~,~
,;,,'/. ''<"s/-:'':.)''~ 'QJ..-b
'-'':;:- -"." ~.
....P~.,
I~:,,; ;L'4 PI.t
lCkUll'.,..,': BI-'Ull'
1'.-'-"_"_"_"
. >
t:/"-
I (
I
!
'@'
s
I
~.;.""'_._--
"r:;
,
~.
F.C'
"
'"
'-
LtaCJVO
',," ;J
".K.- ..
.. ~~.~
~,,- L
.,
c.~...,
.,
-<ll'~~ ~""e;,o'l'- ......_~r
,.,:""", ~l" '1>:1< ~"'"
'"-,,,0 ~j~' ...,.. ~oo
"~N<1l to........""", ,,,-,,,, ~.." "'I:.' 11m.
",-"I ~?Oo\
~."l;"
~.-...,..., ""',m.,:.;. '''''''
~~!.""'l:B'_'" ,...., ""'0\',.".
"'.'lu'D
, ".~
..~.;."r [~"''''''"'
no<.._~~,,, I:~I!{"'>I'
~C<.r.:~~l.!f.w.">
M'.''''-~'''oCf ~^~..<'"
."".." '-;;$' .,..,.,.r~J"" ~^"'....~,
~V'-~~'-~'_
',("It,,_""
to C.'""'~l
.''''Cf"R....,.:
~.Ct ",. ~~...
,:~'~n.m w.""""
<xr'....H."'""'".
. ~ ~c:<-L,ru.
'i<~.,~!C:
II
,
~
"1'
.'
,~
c"';'l_:OJ-..?..>
.,~
~"'..;
,
"
"
'-,
".
"
" ~'''''''''''''
~'ii~~I='tJlih~
';"0.'__. ._..'-; ._.._....:...'-___".... _......_ [lfn__.._
f.!JAL._f'BP/'J.1iIl'_~H~'1f.Il'.nQlt.
,';I!.lis.;
Ai"'~'~.';S .."c(_
I<n;~ "c: -~ ';';:WJ"~,-",i:. c.. MV' :rJ<, '.'1"\'1.
4> ~~:~<: .;
._'S O;;~H_"~~. S
,_ f ,,',e....C <II '.. ~.':~\IJ'Vi, -1;.Jo.S QR
~, ,.~;,--,~-..,,;
~I...d< ~1,<'i ;.1')...... ~'.I";'.",. ~~!:- ., 'k.l' "',~ .;'..;....._0 l'l';;.(,r
~J'":f''' ,~ ." ~N ^.;"-" S NO -,n::~,\, '.'..');!,) "~"I'~
-,:0,\",~".,s ,;;;,.i.j' "'.~ :~<J,i( ,',<;,;I;t, h~'< ~", IlHN :.;'_.'~l'.u
",.."Xl
'-''-''
"~
2 .,,,"..-'.,::;-i/.>; t:':.
[SKETCH OF SURV"EYl
"
TRACT L.
'".,~
/
/
,,~ }/
". r-- --'
___ :2,(,' ~E I
";0' La-LT_-ic,--:\,~'-;5.
, ...... \J!1 X ~
'-.- .:x:CUNm) 1 'L-.~
/""-<:"'-..'1--~~W--===-""'!~6 ~ .,
! "l. -- .
/ ~-.... r.~
jl '- ", "'" /../
i '..... ~.~,'_ /~_ ',,"'"
/ ~ Id
f .~ : !
4- ;' llr}!~_
~';~~.J"''';'?P)_ 1;-
'--VA /f..:~~.>!/ 1f
'-< /~',?c /....'<..,<.r, j\,
^ I ,,0; !J;
/ /:,( i
:~~'~:;.--(i/; /,
"',,- !~ i:i
//
//
/
!!I:
-,~,
.:J!~
~/.~
ifl ,;:
~, (~
~/ ,~~
~I <\
'VI .!'
.~
,'.\
"j.
f.'tJJ,Il..t'lJ:Ji,",l'~'
1
"
.
...
../
/
/~.-------.-
~~
I.'.".:
,
,
-"
,/, /..-r"
L..7:::.........-. "'""""-...-
,}.\1te-!ytuff{"~
"l. cr"'11I'"Io,n: 'K ~'o~[;.
"
'_:)IH,,~
~^-l a ~1"Ii!.r. ~NI;;" !{;, .~(~
~>;'T V,,"IJ['. #lIK1f,lT 'H~ ,,,-;,,.,,Tl;AE ,,"r' I'" ,-",'Gj"lll. ~~''i<.~1
';:'>':' Of, il,-'-"'1!l.^ u;;(,,5U) <'"P'/1",tJO/ ,,,,IJ o,I^""Ut
.~....~
[~~'I~:
.1I.....n.-. &" 51",,,,,,,,..., :J'rl~.
I ~~ $-p~: ..;l-:.:~
_ _/ ..''1'''- _ 'H~' ItHhtH,:. ,~Il,<
I~
, 'm.~Tlf,
Agenda Item No. 17B
May 13, 2008
Page 28 of 31
~
,
i
I
I
]
I
I
i
/
RESOLUTION 08-
A RESOLUTION OF TIll llOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
PETITION NUMllER VA.2008.AR.I29SI, FOR A IO.7-FOOT
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED I5.FOOT FRONT
YARD SETllACK TO 4.3 FEET, I,'OR A CORNER LOT
LOCATED WITHIN THE VINEYARDS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIRED IN COLLillR COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of (lIe State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce wning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
\VHEREAS, Lhe County pursuant thereto has adopted a Lund De-velopmcnt CorJe (LDC)
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as. amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS. the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said
r
reglllations made and provided, and has considered the advi&ability of a 1O.7-fool v.,riunce from
the required 15~foot front yard setback to 4.3 feet, for a corner lot located in the Vineyards
P]nnned Unit Development :lS shown on the attached plot pl<ln, Exhibit A, and has found as a
matter of fact that salisflictory provi:)ion and arrangement have been made concerning fill
applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the
Zoning Regu]<ltions of said L,ltld Development Code for [be unincorporated area of Collier
County; and
\VHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opport~lOity to be heard by this. Bomd
in public meeting a.llsemhlf'A"I, i'lnd the Board hayjng considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RF.,OLVED BY THE BOARD 01' ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, U,al
Petition VA.2008..AR-1295 1, riled by Irvine Dubow with respect to the propcl1)' locnted
at 5901 Almaden Drive, Naples, Florida, further hereinafter described as:
Lot 26, Sonoma Lake Unit I, a subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 16, Pages B-
14 of the pllLlic records of Collier County, Florida.
be and the same hereby is approved for a IO.7-foot variance from the required 15-foOl front yard
setback to 4.3 feet as shown on the iluached plot plan attached as Exhibit A, of the wning district
wherein said property is located.
Page I 012
f\genca Item hlo. 178
May 13, 2003
Page 29 of 31
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA-
2008-AR-12951 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this _ day of
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to fonn
and legal sufficiency:
Ln~
U . ~ Chie f\sslstant County Attorney
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 178
May 13, 2008
Page 30 of 31
l
'~'
I
or--- ,
.' . .'
[SKfi'CHOFSURV-EYl
!
I
/
i
i
/
// //
,
,
~-;>
,
,
TRAOTL4
UOBwl1
~ ,~~ g :~: ~;: ~~......,
,...~..& ,......uo._....
,...,. .'"""'._'''''''''''-.....M.
::t. ~."""
;,? :r~:<:'::t~""
:.~! 5~:"""'\
., ,.,~.(, ,"'......
~<.,. "'" """'" h\lw>,.
., ."'~..,~~ ,.-.
~:" :::;;:,:;::, ."'.,...... r........'
<" g;~~
7' r..'~......."'"
~:., ,::,,~--:;........,-
<, ,,,,,,'_.'(<
'.
~~
.~
'--.,
i'
I
/
i
,
'o~
'~Q,..~
,...."'"
i
I
"
/
'I' "",
.\~;:,"",
I
I
I
..K..,......
;
.'~
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
0''"'" "''''''', u'~c., 10, 1_ f
"", ."'~ "'''Iv! '>It ~.1\,~ ~ ....' "..'....,....... )
l<^'vA'...,...,.L<<<rt\.l.tll>Jl\>t'l'O((.....:>u""'fl'.
;
/
',--
" ,
....,~! r.,
it ~
/"~
'"
Jc;V?-<--
~.'ttrl:;,".:...':'.m
'~."'. -
0" .. .-
.. . ..._".. ....
~ -......,..,.- -
UiJ.L/.fJ&JJl;.
M,jl.M!'f'~f.i.ll.IiU1o
t~~tfl~i~;t~[..:ii~&..{JnJ\?W1,;,,~.~~. 'f,CAl)'
Iill.U:.
""'l""" "',.....t...."',.,.!; "... """-"""-l v .."A'>!'>."""'"
........."."'..."..
"'.$ .....~"1' :$ :>oo.;C IQ (<$6.t01;. ,,\V..,::r-.$ C~
....1:'..::1<'.; ',V~::',,,,
I "~''''''''.,, """"'; ~,"t.... we '" ,,,, ."" ):<M>..i ).I~O'
. '..., "_",,,,~,, ,I,~." ..>1, <f >0 ~()" '"'''''' ""'...~.
""""~O\'t"",.~ <'H' t..... '"",.x ,..""" ......, ~, "..~ ,'''''CO
,\ .(4... %""'..,,> '!1."'.'(t d' ~lJt~,
~
Exhibit A
P.,oenda Item r'~o. 17B
~ May 13, 2008
Page 31 of 31