Agenda 09/09-10/2008 Item #17B
EXECUTfVESU~RY
r N;:~_ND~I
,I. Sf? 0 9 ZOO" .
J!l"g,,"" I 0 -f Cfb .
~'''-'-.'- -:::; -.-~~~~- ~
~,
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 Wing South, Inc., represented by Heidi Williams, AICP of Q.
Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., requesting a PUD Amendment to increase the number
of single-family dwelling nnits from 11 units to a maximnm of 16 nnits by deleting all of
10.3 acres from Commercial (Tract D) and adding it to Private Air Park District (Tract C);
1.98 acres from the Private Air Park District (Tract C) shall be added to Single-family
Residential (Tract B). The additional 5 nnits would increase the overall maximum number
of dwelling units in the PUD from 569 to 574 units. The subject property is located on the
north side of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road, approximately one mile west of Collier
Boulevard (CR 951), northeast of the intersection of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and
Skyway Drive, in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTfVE:
~
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider a request for an amendment to the
ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (POD) to increase the number of single-family
dwelling units from II units to a maximum of 16 units. This will be accomplished by deleting
all of 10.3 acres from the Commercial (Tract D) and adding the acreage to the Private Air Park
District (Tract C); 1.98 acres from the Private Air Park District (Tract C) shall be added to the
Single-family Residential (Tract B).
CONSIDERATIONS:
The purpose of this petition is for a minor amendment to Ordinance Number 82-49. Instead of
adopting a new POD by Ordinance that would repeal Ordinance Number 82-49, this amendment
deletes all of Tract D (Commercial) and transfers all 10.3 acres to Tract C (Private Airpark
District) and transfers 1.98 acres from Tract C (Private Airpark District) to Tract B (Single-
Family Residential).
This will result in the deletion of Tract D and all of the commercial uses. Tract C (private
Airpark District) will increase from 37.8 acres to 46.13 acres. Tract B (Single-family
Residential) will increase from 3.7 acres to 5.68 acres. The additional 5 units would increase the
overall maximum number of dwelling units in the POD from 569 to 574 units. The 168.H acre
POD currently has 98 attached villa units and I I single-family units constructed and this
amendment will increase the number of single-family units to 16.
The proposed amendment also requires a revision to the PUD Master Plan and PUD Document
to reflect the change in tract sizes and the elimination of the commercial tract and its associated
land uses. This amendment does not propose any changes that would affect environmental,
buffer, or drainage issues. No deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC) are being
sought with this amendment.
.-
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9. 2008 Bee
Page 1 of 7
N~ EN A IT M 1
FlSCAL_ACT,. .. I~'~-;Y~b
The requested amendment of thIs PUD by and of Itself wIll have no fiscal Impact on ~.._,
County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of
development, however, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the existing land will be
developed and the new development will result in a minor impact on Collier County public
facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities, These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan
(GMP) as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally,
in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local
development order approved by Collier County is required to pay 50 percent of the estimated
Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project. Other fees collected prior to issuance of
a building permit include building permit review fees and utility fees associated with connecting
to the County's water and sewer system.
Please note that the inclusion of impact fees and taxes collected are for informational purposes
only; they are not included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze
this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP):
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban
designated area (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the
countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Within
this designation, and in accordance with the Density Rating System and the Density Reduction
provisions of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), a base density of four (4) units per acre is
permitted, with the caveat that since the subject property is located within the Traffic Congestion
Area (TCA), one dwelling unit per acre is subtracted from the base density, thus yielding a total
of three (3) units per acre that is permitted for the subject POO.
The ShadowWood PUD was approved on July 13, 1982 by Ordinance No. 82-49, with a
maximum gross density of 3.6 units per acre. Furthermore, right-of-way was dedicated from this
property for the widening of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road. Consequently, via Policy 5.10 of the
FLUE, the existing gross density of 3.6 units per acre is deemed to be consistent with the FLUE
based upon an exemption application approved pursuant to the Zoning Re-evaluation Program
adopted by Ordinance No. 90-23.
Density in the existing POO was approved prior to the adoption of the Density Rating System of
the FLUE. Said density was calculated by taking into account the Multi-Family Residential
portion of the PUD (Tracts A and E), the Single-Family Residential area (Tract B), the
entrance road, and the Private Air Park District (Tract C) of the POO Master Plan and which was
approved for non-residential uses. The Density Rating System ofthe FLUE states that acreage to
be used for calculating density is exclusive of the commercial and industrial portions of a project.
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September g. 2008 BCC
Page 2 of7
N~~~~^~~T.al_ ~
~' -'" rl
i~~~~;-r-~P !i
The commercial area (Tract D) was originally excluded from the density calcUlatrons.
Furthermore, though Tract C, Private Air Park District, does allow - and is developed with -
non-residential uses, staff does not believe it equates to a commercial or industrial land use such
that the acreage of Tract C should be excluded from residential density calculations. Also,
Policy 5.1 contains no provision to "convert" non-residential use to residential density.
Conversely, the Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus of the Density Rating System allows
properties that have been found to be consistent by policy through the Collier County Re-
evaluation Program adopted by Ordinance No. 90-23, such as the subject PUD, a density bonus
of up to ] 6 dwelling units per acre to be added for every one acre of commercial zoning that is
converted to residential zoning.
Approved (existing) PUD density:
. 569 du + ] 57.8 acres [113.3 (Tract A and E) + 3.7 (Tract B) + 37.8 (Tract C) + 3.0 (entrance
drive), and exclusive of Tract D, the commercial tract] = 3.6 units/acre
. Proposed PUD amendment density in accordance with the present Density Rating System
. Conversion of commercial (Tract D): 10.3 acres x ] 6 units/acre = 164.8 du
. 157.8 acres [113.3 (Tract A and E) + 3.7 (Tract B) + 37.8 (Tract C) + 3.0 (entrance drive), and
exclusive of Tract D, the commercial tract] x 3 units/acre = 473.4 du
. Grand total: 164.8 du + 473.4 du = 638.2 potential du (or 69.2 du more than the original
PUD), for an eligible gross density of 3.80 du/a (638 unitsIl68.] acres)
However, the petitioner is seeking to add only 100.6 units from the conversion of commercial
bonus, rather than the 164.8 units that could potentially be allowed. This yields a total of 574
units, or 5 additional units to the original overall maximum of 569 dwelling units, for a gross
density 00.41 du/a (574 unitsll68.l acres),
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. The
Comprehensive Planning Department leaves this determination to the Zoning and Land
Development Review Department's staff as part of the total review of the petition.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the amendment to the ShadowWood PUD may
be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
Transportation Element: The Transportation Division has reviewed the proposed amendment
and finds the following:
The adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project's site-
generated traffic throughout the five-year planning period. Rattlesnake Hammock Road has a
service volume of 3,200 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 2,437 trips between
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9. 2008 Bee
Page 3 of 7
. "~:;N:AC:f1 ~
'U:'JL,",.(dof- 9 fp ;
Polly Avenue and CR-951; and is currently at Level of Service "B" (LOS "B") as stated by the
2006 Annual Urban Inventory Report (AUlR). Improvements of roadways adjacent to
Rattlesnake Hammock Road are near completion. This includes alignment of the intersection of
Skyway Drive and Grand Lely Drive at Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The intersection will
remain unsignalized at this time. The proposed development produces 3 p.m. peak hour, peak
direction trips which represent less than a ,01 percent impact, therefore the project is consistent
with Policies 5.1 and 5.2. of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan
(GMP).
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMP ACT:
The existing PUD does not contain any provisions for affordahle housing units or financial
contribution for such. The applicant has not offered contrihution to offset the development's
impact on affordable housing.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services staff reviewed this petitIOn and determined that the proposed
amendment will not have any impact on environmental issues. Similarly the Environmental
Advisory Council did not review this petition hecause the proposed changes do not have any
impact on environmental issues.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CepC) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC originally heard petition PUDA-2007-AR-11283 on September 20, 2007, and
recommended denial by a vote of 7-1. The CCPC found that the original petition was
inconsistent with Rezone Findings I and 12, and PUD Finding 3, all of which relate to
conformity with the GMP.
The petitioner has since met with Comprehensive Planning Staff and has presented a new
proposal that is consistent with the GMP. (Refer to GMP Consistency Report above.)
The CCPC heard this petition a second time on June 27, 2008, and voted unanimously (9-0) to
forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of
approval. Because the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous and no letters of
objection have been received, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is an amendment to the existing ShadowWood PUD (Ordinance No. 82-49) which proposes
to add five single-family residential dwelling units. This proposed amendment is quasi-judicial
in nature. As such the burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the
proposal is consistent with all of the applicable criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to
the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denial, that such denial is not
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9, 2008 BCe
Page 4 of7
N~G':~~'!!.~~ 'h fL
:.~ SEP n t, ?O::I:' \ j,.)
1-!::fJ.'"~,,,'2.;~'ifo 'i
arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by findIng"that the
amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria.
Criteria for pun Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
I. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained
at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only
after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies
of the Growth Management Plan,
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on
design, and buffering and screening requirements.
5, Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve
the development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and
pri vate.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
8. Consider: Confonnity with POO regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9, 2008 Bee
Page 5 of7
N~~~,~.DA ITEM -~
SE~_ :O--~'~;~'I (\1 E>
. 1-" ~_IJ) r:r- '{JO f
10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate consldenng -the existing Jand use
pattern?
II. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or olherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege
to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used In
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24, Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range
of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9. 2008 Bee
Page 6 of7
N~?END~.'.E~~~'d-" ,
"'f"
',.f ,~-)
t:)-o} ..' (',:: fl:.
ILs~~2~~~k:
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on
the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of
service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code
ch.106, art.II], as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that
the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
Board of County Commissioners hearing as these materials relate to these criteria, This item has
been reviewed by the County Attorney Office and is legally sufficient for Board action.
(MMSS)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve PUDA-2007-AR-11283
ShadowWood PUD amendment.
PREPARED BY:
Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 ShadowWood PUDA
September 9, 2008 Bee
Page 7 of 7
If '~:;N~^-I~::'/~.i ] J2
. '..-.... ,:/l,.. '/ v~
.?J o-f' 9 0 .
This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. This item continued from the November 13, 2007 BCC Meeting. PUDA-2007-
AR-11283 Wing South, Inc., represented by Heidi Williams, AICP of a. Grady Minor and Associates,
P.A., requesting an amendment of the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance
No. 82-49 to increase the number of single family dwelling units from 11 units to a maximum of 16
units by deleting all of 10.3 acres from Commercial (Tract D) and adding it to Private Air Park
District (Tract C). 1.98 acres from the Private Air Park District (Tract C) shall be added to Single-
family Residential (Tract B). The additional 5 units would increase the overall maximum number of
dwelling units in the PUD from 569 to 574 units. The subject property is located along the north
side of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road, approximately one mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951),
northeast of the intersection of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and Skyway Drive, in Section 16,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Prepared By:
Department
Transportation Planning
Date
8/26/2008 2:34:11 PM
Approved By:
Department
Transportation
Planning
Approval
Date
Pending
8/31/20083:01 PM
Approved By:
Department
Approval
Date
County Approved
Manager's Office
8/31/20083:42 PM
ATTACHMENTS:
Name:
Description:
Type:
[l EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8.
29-08.doc Executive Summary
Executive Summary
[l S19f! R.ep.m1.9~.Jldf
[l LQ.~atiQ.n Map_2.2_8.cOLQd!
[l App!j~ajjQnJH 4.GB.D.d!
[J Ordinance CAD approved
8.14.GB.pill
[l OL<LJl~,pQj
[l Ma.s.1eLl'lan.sJ.HLBA:>d!
[l shadow WQQ.d.IriR
Gffiarati.Qn..8.e'p.Qrjj.O'?4CO?"Rl:JJ
Staff Report
Locatio n Map
Application
Staff Report
Location Map
Application
Ordinance
Ordinance
PUD Document
PUD Document
Master Plan
Master Plan
TIS
Backup Material
- - AGENDA iiE,~ (-713
~ J,.---
.
Co~r County
~ ~--"-- ~
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
SEP"I'-"
del: ,I
L~Pg_ ~q-o-f- it fo !
_._~'~;--~:=--::'~'.
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
HEARING DATE: JUNE 27, 2008
SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PUDA-2007-AR-I1283, SHADOWWOOD PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Mr. Jim Kaiser
Wing South Inc.
4130 Skyway Drive
Naples, FL 34112
J REQUESTED ACTION:
Ms. Heidi Williams, AICP
Q. Grady Minor & Associates
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an
amendment to the ShadowWood Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the number of
single family dwelling units from 11 units to a maximum of 16 units in Tract B (Single-family
Residential) by deleting all of Tract 0 (Commercial) and transferring all 10J acres to Tract C
(Private Airpark District) and transferring 1.98 acres from Tract C (Private Airpark District) to
Tract B (Single-Family Residential).
This will result in the deletion of Tract D and all of the commercial uses. Tract C (Private Airpark
District) will increase from 37.8 acres to 46.13 acres. Tract B (Single-family Residential) will
increase from 3,7 acres to 5.68 acres, The additional 5 units would increase the overall maximum
number of dwelling units in the PUD from 569 to 574 units.
The petitioner is proposing an amendment to Ordinance Number 82-49, the ShadowWood PUD
instead of adopting a new PUD by Ordinance and repealing that Ordinance.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The ShadowWood PUD is located on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road,
approximately one mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), northeast of the intersection of
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road (CR-864) and Skyway Drive, in Section 16, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on following page.)
)
ShadowWood PUD. PUDA.2007.AR-11283
June 27. 2008 CCPC
Page 1 of 10
N~~':N~~m:.~, J l1 ()
.
,,1'.'
of9b''l .
.. -"':-:'"':"---::c:~.::.::_ ;1
--
CIIld
I
n
I
.
_J
-L..~_
~ I,
,
. .
.'
.
i
~ I
. i l~ . .
1 ill I
I
I
~l I
~m~
II-
.
!l
. !
. .
.
.I! II = =
I
I~ I
Ii .t
Ig
B
'l!~
.
--~
...
.
1l~.113
.
!~ I
I
n-
Il.
<(
:::E
C)
z
z
o
N
'"
..
OJ
~
~
Ii:
<
.
..
o
o
OJ
,
<
o
:>
..
..
z
o
!:
....
w
..
Il.
<(
~
z
o
I-
<(
U
o
..J
.
, ~: ~
I ~~ a
J
)
-OvO;lt;O,;;';~-i~S31il~ --
c:J
ZD
"'~
o
a ~~
" '"
CL ~~
o '" >-
~UJcnO:::
g,~t5~ ~
~~~~ ~
:::!::r:(I) ...
:i Uw i~
z12a:r: . E-;
(3 Wf-u c.,
f!5~~;:~ )i
<L~
W ~1;;(rn ~
I<Q.-::iUl Q,.
~~~:d5ti
~zzu..~
D:::Qowt-
u...f-w Z
ClQI:Jg
~~~ffi(j}
<(<(VI Ow
w zz,-,
\5 S Q ~~
Wl.o.t/l:CI
CC:l:;t~gu
~5a:: 0>-
:!: '<i~~
t:56~~
~(L~~6
XO::r;]fi:CD
WWI-t-
{f}tn~U1~
~~3~~
w
~
01
z
!.;~H i
"
0.-9
I~~~;~
= q t
~
~
:! ~
~ ~
~
.
~ . Ii
~ ffi ~
; B ~ ~
I~n~ i~
::I! J. ~ ~ ~
I g ~ ~ ~
.., ill 0.. g
011 I I I...
<( !D '"' t::I ~
~nh
~
m
"
.
~
"':'j !
.. ,
. ,
~ii. I
:!i ill
u, !
:;\," I"
~.I! d
~U~ i ~
o~ i =
"I' "
~ll, I
~ili 1
01 I
0',
t
I
I
I
.
N~~~~"ITE 4 D
SEP D '; ?f!O': 1
L~~( cl?.t-1/;?'
The purpose of this petition is for a minor amendment to Ordinance Number 82-49, the
ShadowWood PUD instead of adopting a new PUD by Ordinance and repealing that Ordinance by
deleting all of Tract 0 (Commercial) and transferring all 10.3 acres to Tract C (Private Airpark
District) and transferring 1.98 acres from Tract C (Private Airpark District) to Tract B (Single-
Family Residential).
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This will result in the deletion of Tract 0 and all of the commercial uses, Tract C (Private Airpark
District) will increase from 37.8 acres to 46.13 acres. Tract B (Single-family Residential) will
increase from 3.7 acres to 5.68 acres. The additional 5 units would increase the overall maximum
number of dwelling units in the PUD from 569 to 574 units. The 168.H acre PUD currently has
98 attached villa units and II single-family units constructed and this amendment will increase the
number of single-family units to 16.
The proposed amendment also requires a revision to the PUD Master Plan and PUD Document to
reflect the change in tract sizes and the elimination of the commercial tract and its associated land
uses. This amendment does not propose any changes that would affect environmental, buffer, or
drainage issues, No deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC) are being sought with
this amendment.
This petition was previously heard by the CCPC on September 20, 2007 and was recommended for
denial by a vote of 7-1. The CCPC found that the original petition was inconsistent with Rezone
. Findings I and 12, and PUD Finding 3, all of which relate to conformity with the GMP.
The petitioner has since met with Comprehensive Planning Staff and is now presenting a new
proposal that is consistent with the GMP. (Refer to GMP Consistency Report below.)
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: a future right of way reservation tract of "Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD," a
golf course residential community (density of 1.43 units per acre) and undeveloped land with a
zoning designation of A.
East: preserve areas of "Naples Lakes Country Club PUD", a golf course residential community
(density 1.67 units per acre) and undeveloped conservation land within "LASIP Conservation Area
PUD."
South: Rattlesnake Hammock Road (C.R 864), then undeveloped parcels within "Lely, a Resort
Community, Development of Regional Impact" (DRI) (density of 3.5 units per acre).
West: Single-family dwellings, multi-family dwellings, and vacant land, with zoning designations
of RMF-6, RSF-3, RSF-4 and A with a special treatment overlay on a small portion of the area
(6.CHo acres).
.
ShadowWood PUD, PUDA-2007-AR-112B3
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 4 of 10
.
J
M
SEP 0 9 lOOP
I :j f:l+ q 10
AERIAL
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area
(Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the countywide
Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), Within this designation,
and in accordance with the Density Rating System and the Density Reduction provisions of the
Future Land Use Element (FLUE), a base density of four (4) units per acre is permitted, with the
caveat that since the subject property is located within the Traffic Congestion Area (TCA), one
dwelling unit per acre is subtracted from the base density, thus yielding a total of three (3) units
per acre that is permitted for the subject PUD.
The ShadowWood PUD was approved on July 13,1982 by Ordinance No. 82-49, with a maximum
gross density of 3.6 units per acre. Furthermore, right-of-way was dedicated from this property for
the widening of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road. Consequently, via Policy 5.10 of the FLUE, the
existing gross density of 3.6 units per acre is deemed to be consistent with the FLUE based upon
an exemption application approved pursuant to the Zoning Reevaluation Program adopted by
Ordinance No. 90-23.
)
Density in the existing PUD was approved prior to the adoption of the Density Rating System of
the FLUE. Said density was calculated by taking into account the Multi-Family Residential
portion of the PUD (Tracts A and E), the Single-Family Residential area (Tract B), the
entrance road, and the Private Air Park District (Tract C) of the PUD Master Plan and which was
ShadowWood PUD. PUDA-2007-AR-11283
June 27. 2008 CCPC
Page 5 of 10
.
.
.
I NAGENDA ITEM
t~!J~~-1
approved for non-residential uses. The Density Rating System of the FLUE states that acreage to
be used for calculating density is exclusive of the commercial and industrial portions of a project.
The commercial area (Tract D) was originally excluded from the density calculations,
Furthermore, though Tract C, Private Air Park District, does allow - and is developed with - non-
residential uses, staff does not believe it equates to a commercial or industrial land use such that
the acreage of Tract C should be excluded from residential density calculations. Also, Policy 5.1
contains no provision to "convert" non-residential use to residential density,
Conversely, the Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus of the Density Rating System allows
properties that have been found to be consistent by policy through the Collier County Re-
evaluation Program adopted by Ordinance No, 90-23, such as the subject PUD, a density bonus of
up to 16 dwelling units per acre to be added for every one acre of commercial zoning that is
converted to residential zoning,
Approved (existing) PUD density:
. 569 du -.- 157.8 acres [113.3 (Tract A and E) + 3.7 (Tract B) + 37.8 (Tract C) + 3,0 (entrance
drive), and exclusive of Tract 0, the commercial tract] = 3.6 units/acre
. Proposed PUD amendment density in accordance with the present Density Rating System:
. Conversion of commercial (Tract D): 10.3 acres x 16 units/acre = 164.8 du
. 157.8 acres [113.3 (Tract A and E) + 3.7 (Tract B) + 37.8 (Tract C) + 3.0 (entrance drive), and
exclusive of Tract D, the commercial tract] x 3 units/acre = 473.4 du
. Grand total: 164.8 du + 473.4 du = 638.2 potential du (or 69.2 du more than the original PUD),
for an eligible gross density of 3.80 du/a (638 units/168.1 acres).
However, the petitioner is seeking to add only 100.6 units from the conversion of commercial
bonus, rather than the 164.8 units that could potentially be allowed. This yields a total of 574 units,
or 5 additional units to the original overall maximum of 569 dwelling units, for a gross density of
3.41 du/a (574 units/I 68.1 acres).
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area, The
Comprehensive Planning Department leaves this determination to the Zoning and Land
Development Review Department's staff as part of the total review of the petition.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the amendment to the ShadowW ood PUD may be
deemed consistent with the FLUE.
Transportation Element: The Transportation Division has reviewed the proposed amendment
and finds the following:
The adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project's site-generated
traffic throughout the five-year planning period. Rattlesnake Hammock Road has a service
volume of 3,200 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 2,437 trips between PoJIy
ShadowWood PUD, PUDA-2007-AR-11283
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 6 of 10
.,
J
')
NAGEND ,
0._
" SEP 0 G ?rmR
i p I S-~ct~
Avenue and CR-951; and is currently at Level of Service "B" (LOS "B") as ~~2!lilii"~__
Annual Urban Inventory Report (AUIR). Improvements of roadways adjacent to Rattlesnake' .
Hammock Road are near completion. This includes alignment of the intersection of Skyway Drive
and Grand Lely Drive at Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The inte!seetion will remain unsignalized
at this time. The proposed development produces 3 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips which
represent less that a .01 percent impact, therefore the project is consistent with Policies 5,1 and 5.2.
ofthe Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria upon which a
favorable determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Sections
10.02.13.8.5 and 10.03.05.H of the Land Development Code (LDC) and required staff evaluation
and comment. The staff evaluation establishes a factual basis to support the recommendations of
staff. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) uses these same criteria as the basis for
their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn, use the criteria
to support their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are completed as separate
documents and are attached to the Staff Report (See Exhibit A and Exhibit B).
Environmental Review: Environmental Services Staff reviewed this petition and determined that
the proposed amendment will not have any impact on environmental issues, Similarly, the
Environmental Advisory Council did not review this petition because the proposed changes do not
have any impact on environmental issues,
Transportation Planning Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed this project and is
recommending approval of this amendment subject to the following stipulation:
The developer shall pay his fair share of the intersection improvements at Rattlesnake Hammock
and Slryway Drive currently undergoing construction as part of the Rattlesnake Hammock Widen-
ing project. Payment shall be requiredfor six "P.M Peak Hour" trips prior to the issuance of the
final certificate of occupancy for the newly constructed homes.
Utilities Review: This project is located within the Collier County Sewer District boundary, and
shall be subject to application for and conditions associated with a sewer availability letter from
the Collier County Utilities Division. This project is required to comply with Ordinance No. 2004-
31. According to the GIS, there is an existing 20-inch water main and 20-inch force main along
Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
Emergency Management Review: The ShadowWood PUD is located in a Category 3 Hurricane
Surge Zone which requires evacuation during some hurricane events. The addition of five
residential units has minimal impact. Therefore, the Emergency Management Department has no
issues with approval of this petition.
Zoning Review: A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to Collier County's
legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the uses that would be permitted if
the proposed zoning action (PUD amendment) is approved, and to the requirements or limitations
set forth in the FLUE of the GMP. The proposed change as noted previously is minor-to add five
single-family dwelling ul'its to the PUD by deleting Tract D (Commercial) and its associated uses
ShadowWood PUD. PUDA-2007-AR-11283
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 7 of 10
.
.
.
1:1~-1:~~AB~:::-I-i
'_ ge_.
-~-'=:-~::::-...-~___" _ I
and transferring the 10.3 acres from said Tract D to Tract C (Private Airpark District) i~d~~
transferring 1.98 acres from Tract C (Private Airpark District) to Tract B (Single-Family
Residential District).
As noted in the GMP discussion, this PUD was approved prior to the adoption of the GMP, and
has thus been deemed consistent by Policy if the overall density or intensity of use is not increased.
When the ShadowWood PUD was originally approved, it was determined that the uses and
development standards are compatible with the land uses that have been developed or would be
developed on adjacent properties. As discerned from the aerial photograph, the surrounding
zoning discussion and the Master Plan, the ShadowWood PUD is already developed with single-
family housing, The proposed single-family housing would simply be a continuation of the
existing line of single- family homes located directly to the north of the proposed single-family
homes. In addition, the proposed single-family homes will be developed to the same PUD
development standards as the existing single-family homes.
The neighboring area has co-existed within the existing ShadowWood PUD development with
seemingly little problems. As previously noted, the property to the north of the proposed site is
single-family homes. Directly east of the site is Tract C, which contains the private air strip. To
the south of the proposed single-family homes is Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Directly to the
west is Skyway Drive, which the proposed homes will front onto and be accessed from, then a lake
and multi-family homes.
AERIAL OF PROJECT SITE
ShadowWood PUD, PUDA-2DD7-AR-11283
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 8 of 10
.
.j
N~~:~A ITEM i
("\r-~,
.~. ~ ....... .", ~.'"
..It 'I ,,- .!m~ i {S
:Pgc 1- "..c-Lh '
'_=:_=_.~.' ,-J _ l/G
-. -.
The original Master Plan submitted for the entire ShadowWood PUD is barely legible, The
petitioner has provided a redrawn PUD Master Plan that was recreated from the original adopted
PUD Master Plan, It is entitled "Exhibit B PUD Master Plan" and dated December 2006, Only
the absolute minimal revisions from the original mfu>ter plan are shown. The revisions also include
strike through/underlines to the Summary Table and boundary changes to Tracts B, C and D.
The proposed Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 82-49 has been revised to remove the
commercial tract and land uses and is shown as strike through/underlines in the amended PUD
Ordinance.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on May 23, 2007 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Wing South Clubhouse, 4130 Skyway Drive, Naples, FL. Approximately twenty people including
the applicant, agent and County Staff attended the meeting. Of those who spoke, most supported
the single-family development proposed by the applicant. Most of the concerns stated were relative
to traffic, the architectural look of the homes, and the association. Heidi Williams, of Q, Grady
Minor and Associates, responded that the access to the new homes would be Skyway Drive and
that 6 trips during peak hours would be created. She also stated that the homes would be similar in
style to neighboring homes and the applicant is willing to propose language for the homeowner's
association documents to reflect this commitment. The applicant is also working with the Tract B
homeowners association to determine if they might be interested in adding the new homeowners to
their association. If not, the applicant proposes to form a new homeowners association. The agent
also explained to the neighbors that the five proposed homes are to be located on approximately 2
acres and that the property would be converted from Tract C to Tract B. Synopsis provided by
Consuela Whiteway, Planning Technician and rewritten by Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning
Commission forward Petition PUDA-2007-AR-1l283 to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation that this amendment be approved.
)
ShadowWood PUD, PUDA-2007-AR-11283
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 9 of 10
.
PREPARED BY:
NOA jTEI~'----:
. SEP (1", ?W' /
! P!~-~+_~.Ic
- - .-
~._-,._---:.:~
(; .lti
DtACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPART NT'OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
rH% 30 infJ
C~TE /
REVIEWED BY:
~, ~/1il'?3i,;0r{d-'~ -~
-{0 MARlO M. ST ENT-STIRLING'
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
.
.
w -c. -08
DATE
~4M....I?F d
RA OND V, BELLOWS, MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(,-"('0 ~
DATE
~ '--Yv1 ~~~
SDSAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
h/rI~8
DA E
APPROVED BY:
~/'lkV
/ DATE
b-11-D ?'
DATE
MARK P STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
Tentatively scheduled for the September 9, 2008 Board of County Commissioners Meeting.
Exhibits: A. Rezone Findings
B. PUD Findings
C. Pun Master Plan
ShadowWood PUD, PUDA-2007-AR-11283
June 27, 2008 CCPC
Page 10 of 10
.
Exhibit A
REZONE FINDINGS
PUDA-2007-AR-11283
N~~
, Sf? () s 200R
'--!:"g.~--Ll O~I
--'~~;_~- 1)0
~'-'-";"~~
Chapter IO,03.05.H of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners show that the
Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following,
where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of
the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map and the elements of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP).
The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed Pun amendment is
consistent with all applicable elements of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP).
2.
The existing land use pattern.
J
As noted in the Staff Report, the subject 168.1 acre PUD currently has a total of 569 dwelling
units with a density of 3.6 units per acre. To the north is the future right of way reservation
tract of "Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD," a golf course residential community
with a density of 1.43 units per acre and undeveloped land with an Agriculture zoning
designation, To the east are preserve areas of "Naples Lakes Country Club PUD", a golf
course residential community with a density 1.67 units per acre and undeveloped conservation
land within "LASIP Conservation Area PUD." To the south is Rattlesnake Hammock Road
(C.R 864), then undeveloped parcels within "Lely, a Resort Community, DR! with a density of
3.5 units per acre, To the west is of the site is single-family dwellings, multi-family dwellings,
and vacant land, with zoning designations of RMF-6, RSF-3, RSF-4 and A with a special
treatment overlay on a small portion of the area (6.0:10 acres).
3.
The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The currently approved PUD was deemed to be of sufficient size and did not result in an
isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts when the PUD was adopted. The
proposed amendment does not change the projects consistency with the FLUE.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The district boundaries were previously deemed to be logically drawn in relation to existing
conditions at the time the property was first rezoned to a PUD.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed land use
change necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, per se, but it does seem appropriate given the growth
and development trends, changing market conditions, and the petitioner's stated need to add
more single-family housing in conjunction to the airpark.
Page 1 of 3
.
.
6.
N~~ND~l-r(2
SE~-;;; Inn" IV
I "\" (,.[.
!~;ccgo c.. +- .;, "
'~"'-.. j)C!
Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions ~11 the
neighborhood.
.
The proposed change to add 5 single-family dwellings will not adversely influence living
conditions in the neighborhood because the existing development standards outlined in PUD
should ensure the least amount of adverse impact on adjacent and nearby developments. In
addition, no adopted level of service standard will be adversely impacted by this petition.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The proposed amendment does not increase the intensity of the approved PUD. Therefore, the
proposed PUD amendment wiU not excessively increase traffic congestion.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
Every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization of land for some land use
activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated by
developmental activities.
9.
Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed amendment will not change the currently approved development standards that
have been determined not to seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
10.
Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
The proposed amendment will not increase change the project density, intensity or the approved
development standards. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that this petition will not adversely
affect property values. It should be noted that the value of property is a subjective
determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject
property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning
by itself mayor may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market
value.
11. Whether the proposed change will he a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The development of adjacent properties, in accordance with existing regulations, will not be
affected if this PUD amendment is approved.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDA-2007-AR-11283
Page 2 of 3
..
J
16.
1'.~~.~..r~. ~...A.'..TE.''".;I"
'.~,,4Jd:S~
~ .-..----...-.-,.
The Comprehensive Planning staff has determined that proposed amendment to the PUD
complies with the GMP. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public
welfare relationship because actions consistent with said plans are in the public interest. Since
the proposed amendment will not increase the projects intensity of use, the proposed change
will not constitute a grant of special privilege.
13.
Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The property can be used in accordance with existing zoning. However, any petition for a
change in land use is reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC with the Board of
County Commissioners ultimately ruling what uses and density or intensity is approved or, on
the contrary, if the petition is denied. This petitioner is proceeding through the proper channels
to garner that Board ruling.
14. Whether the change suggested is ont of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County;
The proposed amendment will not change the scale of the project with the needs of the
neighborhood.
15.
Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use iu
districts already permitting such use.
Because the subject site is within the only private airpark community in Collier County, there
are no other sites that have access to an existing airpark landing strip.
The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would
be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Given that much of the project is developed, any additional development of this site would
require minimal site alteration.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management
Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County LDC regarding
Adequate Public Facilities.
-,
,
A multi-disciplined team responsible for reviewing jurisdictional elements of the GMP and the
LDC public facilities requirements has reviewed this land use petition and found it consistent
and in compliance for wning approvaL A fmal determination whether this project meets the
full requirements of adequate public facilities specifications will be determined as part of the
development approval process.
EXHIBIT A
Rezone Findings
PUDA-2007-AR-11283
Page 3 of 3
ll~
.
EXHmIT "B"
AGENDA ITEM
No<_.,____"-_
I
FINDINGS FOR PUD
PUDA-2007-AR-1l283
SEP) c, ,
, ,,;
I Pg~_~?- c+-. '1k>
~;.-,.-_._-- ...~-.__._,-
Section 10.02.13.8.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning
Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following
criteria:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed
in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of
development approved and developed for the subject property. Development
conditions contained in the approved ShadowWood PUD document give
assurance that all infrastructures will be developed consistent with County
regulations. The proposed amendment will not adversely impact the approved
mitigation measures that assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as
prescribed by the GMP.
.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed
agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those
proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be
made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and
facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the amendment application provide evidence of
unified control. The proposed amendment does not change the approved
provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan.
The currently approved ShadowWood PUD has been found consistent with the
goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. A more detailed description of this
conformity of the proposed amendment is contained in the Staff Report,
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which eonditions
may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design,
and buffering and screening requirements.
.
Staff analysis indicates that this amendment will not adversely impact the
ShadowWood PUD's compatibility, both internally and externally, with the
proposed and existing uses,
PUDA-07-AR-11283, SHADOWWOOD PUD Page I of2
..
M
SEP () :;'nOR
I-!g~~~=fib
5. The adequacy of usable opeu space areas in existence and as proposed t~~
serve the development.
The amount of open space currently approved for this PUD is consistent with the
provisions of the Land Development Code. The proposed amendment will not
change the adequacy of the usable open space.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the
adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Given the fact that the ShadowWood PUD is currently under development, the
timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements is not a
significant problem.
7.
The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
.J
Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as
wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property
relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, is supportive of conditions emanating
from urban development. Infrastructure is or will be in place in the vicinity and
its adequacy will be determined at the time of SOP approval, The proposed
amendment will not adversely impact the ability to accommodate expansion.
8.
Couformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such
modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which
development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from
development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional
zoning district. The development standards in this PUD are similar to those
standards and the petitioner is not seeking any deviations.
PUDA-07-AR-11283, SHADOWWOOD PUD Page 2 of2
.
.
.
!
ij'
AGENDA ITEM -,
lIlo. _____.______..
SfF i.
t10
-..._-..-~.
~
~
l;i
;oj
~
..
m
~
"
~
~
e<~.
".,,-,,--^~- --
, ~: ~
I ~~ ~
--------- 1ll'f1j__
-------~; ll;lO""YH 3>M'lS3
ZO
,.:l;
o
Q ~ ~
" '"
n.. ~~
8 <C >-
1-L.lJc.nlr
Il.t::!w~
8~":i
~;!;~::l
...J~J: V'l
" Uw
~~a::c .
~ Wf-u
~~~~~
wo..~l-lD
~~~~Ul
:::J6G
~ZZl..L..<:
troowe:
"-f=wz
a~::c :J~
w~t- a:::
~<ui~~
Lr...J53~
~2Vi~~
cr::w5"u
"'w::>
:Q(5c::o>-
~ ....J~~
l::~~7~
!!l..JQW::l
IQ..,... ~o
xlrrJo::lD
WWI-- t-
V1t;;t;Vl~
~~3~~
cJ
>-
o
z
.. I
:;:i i
~-11l1
~!" ,i
~.I! i!
~iU Ii
~l' I!
~1I, I
~ili 1
"I 'I
.,
C',
u
:~
..c..
:c
><
w
o
t~~~~ ;
i:g :j: Z Z ~
I I
.
,
!
I
I
;
o
i
.
~ m
~ ~
~
II~~~;~
I = q ~
I
~
~
. e
- .
; ~
~
<
"
~
I" "
~ ~ ~
- "
~ 13 '"'
I ~ : ~
~ ~ << ~
~ ... <i! (,)
::l5 I I!! f5
Ii! I \;
'" ii; It 8 IS
~i~ii
~~I
..
I N~~ENDA ITEM
I S~~-~';._- r-~ (A
:\\~ ~c~~ '~~Cr>i'1bI\: '
1\ 0 ~\..' __._"
w-
~~ ~ ~ ~~~,.,,'
\~ 01 I '
ii,
:- 3 ~ gm~
I jl_~
I
~l
-
m,
/
) l . lP~\I;'-~ (,~~
~h ~\ ~h -T ~\ \ I
;.m I ~ J' \I, .k
I " W -hl\-->
L_~ II -1>
I -~:E -it
~~ I:,-i -L
~ I ~ \
Q I,
0'
. >
,
."),1J1......,
I
&
~ ~
1
1
~
11J.J.JJC)
Ei
r 1
I ;i'
.<<ii'-'~a1!l1
! ,t r"1
I .Ie
-1" I
''""11
....c '-'--r' r---c
~ ~
~~!i I ~ oJ
l' r-r--
- I
>, .
.. !
" I
H~ ~i ~
..,-;:< ill,
I :1" .
I!, ~ 1
----
I
...l
f-J I I. II I
'.
'.
'-
o
!
, >
,
!
'i
r---
l"'OSO.l.lON / ~
.
.
.
,
~
!
oJ. s~~
I
,
~! ~
,
]''''''9>'S
; I;
[J ,
, I
I
--n-
>-z , :E: !~~
00
w - i n-
~~ I,E
00
g:g l'~
,. ~~~
..,
h I! ,.~
i ., I"
i~ ~
. , , "
, h , ,
, .
! ~! ,
!
. '" H
.
.
,
N .
,
a..
e::(
::2:
,
z
0
-
l-
e::(
U
0
....J
!
s~
l'!~ ~"'
!~ . il
o " ,
g3>:
!
,
,
Ii
,.
,., ~~
e~
1 .
I !.
I ~do
I 'r
1 I
Ii
!! ~
~
,J
j!
l'
!~
iU
,
~~
,
.
, i
V.I1Ml ~ so
. 1--,' - . .
ill il1~~ ~ ~~ ~
~ . . "II g
~ , i
~H
8 ~"- ~
, .
'-
~3
~i:'l
a..
e::(
::2:
(9
Z
Z
o
N
,
'"
.,
N
'"
-<
,
....
o
o
N
-<
o
::J
0..
..
Z
o
f-
f-
W
0..
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & lAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLlIERGOV.NET
(i)
.I'~.::~JA._!!..~ '
SFt ~ I
2800 NORTH HORSES~~E~ b t.: '.
NAPLES FLORIDA 34104 - -:....I--C{k> i
, ---~ '
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968 -
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
PUDA-2007-AR-11283 REV: 2
Project: 19990174
Date: 6/11/07 DUE: 7/10/07
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) WING SOUTH. INC.
ADDRESS 4310 SKYWAY DRIVE CITY NAPLES STATE FL
ZIP 34112
Telephone #
E-Mail Address:
CELL #
Fa,,#
NAME OF AGENT Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES. P.A.
ADDRESS 3800 VIA DEL REY
CITY BONITA SPRINGS STATE FL
ZIP 34134
Telephone # 239.947-1144
Fax # 239.947.0375
CELL #
E-Mail Address:hwilliams(cj)Qradvminor.com
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULA nONS.
Application For Public Hearing For pun Rezone 6/]4/04
ITEM
Complete the following for all Association{s) affiliated with this petition.
sheets if necessary.
. .)C: "100,"
1 .' (;.r:~
Provide add1t~al_~~_"1:. ~-f.Cj~ 1
---,. ........-.-..-.,'"'=.J
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: SHADOWOOD HOMEc5WNERS ASSOCIATION. MR. RUSSELL
BERGHUIS
MAILING ADDRESS 6202 SHADOWOODCIRCLE
CITY NAPLES
STATE FL
ZIP34112
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: SHADOWOOD PARK, MS. LORI BENNETT
MAILING ADDRESS 6475 SEA WOLF COURT CITY NAPLES
STATE FL
ZIP34112
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
\1~
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and sto k~~~JTEM -I'
the percentage of stock owned by each. -
SEF OC, 'l(Ir,o
J ',_ !",I.'
Name and Address Percentage of Owner~ IPg __ c?--. ~ o-t-LU,
'--:':c:_~_~=.cc=. ._....__..,_,___~
Win9 South. Inc. 100%
4310 Skyway Drive
NaDles. Florida 34112
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
e.
A/TEM
SEP () [, 7nn"
If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or. ~viduals, ~J4
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contr~ ~~;=_,
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. --'
b
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
I
I
Date of Contract: N 1 A
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired [8J leased g Term of lease 6/25/1996
yrs./mos.
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option: NIA
Date option terminates:
Anticipated closing date
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing,
it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a
supplemental disclosure of interest form.
, or
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
M--j'
SEP (l, /0':
Detailed le231 description of the property covered bv the application: (If space is inade ~ e, attach:z , :. 'ik
on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include se -.J c-:7: ~__
description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey '.---.,
(completed within the last six months, maximum I" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-
application meeting,
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning
the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range .....J.L/ 50S / 26E
lal:
Black:
Subdivision:Airoark South of Shadow Wood
Pial Book----1'1- Page #:~ Property 1.0.#:73284000507
Metes & Bounds Description: See Attached
Size of property: 180 ft. X 750 ft, = Tolal Sq. FI.
Acres
Addressilrenerallocation of subiect orooerty: The subiect property is located on the north side of
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road. approximate Iv one mile west of C.R. 951.
PUD District (lDC 2.03.06): D Residential D Community Facilities
D Commercial D Industrial X Mixed Use
tIIIlI. '~~':~~.~~'lr~
.-,-,;'1\'. .."""." .~.."':"$.>_:,-'(\_...._."._,::;_..:_i,;', .,...... ,"/;,' .' .,; ~1..,jt.i;,i\!I .. ">.
Zoning
land use
NPUD,A
SPUD
EPUD
NaDles Heritaae. undeveloced
lelv Resort DRI. undevelooed
Naoles lakes Countrv Club, undevelooed
WRMF-6: RSF-3: A: RSF-4. A-ST low densitv residential: vacant
Does the owner of the subject property own properly contiguous to Ihe subject property? Yes If
so, give complete legal description of enlire contiguous properly. (If space is inadequale, attach
on separole page).
Section/Township/Range .....J.L/ 50S / 26E
lot:
Block:
Subdivision: Wino Soulh-Condo
Pial Book~ Page #:~ Property 1.0.#: 00425960000
Metes & Bounds Description:
Application For Public Hearing For pun Rezone 6/14/04
20nQ
~~t_~~q,.Q
This application is requesting a minor amendment to the Shadow Wood PUD to converll.98:t acres from ~ ....cc~
Tract C, Private Air Park, to Tract B, Single Family Residential.
Present Use of the Properly: The subject propertv is currently vacant land.
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the properly: Five sinale-familv homes.
Original PUD Name:Shadow Wood PUD
Ordinance No.:82-49
.~~II1IIIIIII'IIIIII_
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County land Developm;ent Code, staff's analysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted
below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Considerations (lDC Section 10.02.13.B1
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pollern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water,
and other utilities.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense, Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county allorney.
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development,
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. The ability of the subject properly and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
8.
Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regUlat;o}s i th~::N~:, ':~~:
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting f pblic 3 2.. ~ 'F-~,h.
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Lg=== ~
I
~,
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use Detitions on the subject DroDerty: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held
on this property within the last year? 0 Yes X No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing?
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made ond
the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed"
when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supplv necessary
information to continue orocessina or otherwise actively pursue the rezonina for a period of six 16\
months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application
"closed" through inactivity shail be deemed withdrown. An application deemed "closed" may be re-
opened by submitting 0 new application, repayment of oil application fees and gronting of a
determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code.
(LDC Section 10,03.05.Q.)
Application FOT Public Hearing For pun Rezone 6/14/04
4
,.1....
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(j)
ENDA ITEM
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE Rf ~.- _
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 ~r:P , .
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239 643-~968 .J ':) ?nnp.
J:fj.~;J:l'f:<[6 .
., .,-=:-~::,::
.;;. .....
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
o PUD Rezone
o PUD to PUD Rezone
. .""".",.,
Q'1'PUD 4mendm~t
Date: Jb. 29 (io Time: ~ Firm:
Proied Name: ~V\o&o \JJ nd
(O~~
UiVl()1( 6 ~/l
Size of Praied Site: I. 0
acres
Owner Name: Phone: Z.':b~-1~'2- 0233
Owner Address: "II?(/' -;:7..eyw.4'"Y;;:}Ii? City.State f2L,. ZIP--'31i.12-
Existing PUD Name and Number SMaO\A/oo1 ru.D ovd; V\OOW, ~ P,2-4)
Assi~ned Planner NO~ 01AJdJaJ~
Phone:
,
-'.....,:: .'. .".....',. ;,......, ':..l ....;. ..:.".:::""i ..
Meelil!!f ~ri!leim (.atfacb Sigllln Sheet)
Submlftal requ'if~m;'nts (see ~ext page.:eheckJistJi
-1 -
G:ICurrentlNew Pre-Application Forms 20061PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app
050404.doc
PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA)
'.....""......,<:':";........,.-..,-,..,.'.........,...:..........
PUDREZQN~ (PUOl)
PUD to PUDRElONE (PUDl-A)
A:PPlICATION
SUBMITT A:l CHECKLIST
.
.
SEP I) ?Nflt
fl_1.:> !j~ :j;;, f-" ;2
. '-c-~~l_.~__
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW
W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
REQUIREMENTS
1 Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
Redevelo ment Area)
Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary
Com feted A Iication (download from website for current form)
Pre-o Iication meetin notes
PUD Document & Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 '12" x
11"c:o
Revised Conce tual Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 '12" x 11" co y
Original PUD document and Master Plan 24" x 36" ONLY IF
AMENDING THE PUD
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined
Revised PUD document w/amended Title page w lord #'s, LDC
1 0.02.1 3.A.2
Deeds/Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) ,
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation
Owner/Affidavit signed & notarized
Covenant of Unified Control
Completed Addressing checklist
#OF
COPIES
REQUIRED
NOT
REQUIRED
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24 Y
2
2
2
2
2
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital/electronic copy of
EIS or exem tion 'ustification 4
Historical Surveyor waiver request 4
Utility Provisions Statement w / sketches 4
Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4
Survey, signed & sealed 4
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver 7
Recent Aerial Photograph (wiih habitat areas defined) min scaled \./
1 "=400' 5 ^
Electronic copy of 011 documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or
Diskette)
If located in RFMU (Rural Frinoe Mixed Use) Receivina land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacovero( State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.c.(b)i.c,
Appliccmt / Agent Signature
Date
- 2-
G:\Current\New Pre-Application Forms 20061PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app
050404.doc
~
. . ,
Fe';,,: Application Fee: 0 $10,000 (PUD Rezone) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
o $8,000 [PUD to PUD) + $25 per acre ior fraction thereof) No. JO. ITEM
~ $6,000 (PUD Amendment) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereo ----=::..
M.. SEPJ8?Wm
$150.00 Fire Code ReView I. :2 . ','.
$2,250.00 Compr7he~sive Planning. Ca~sistency R~view !/~,~">}>f}ltJ
KJ $500.00 Pre-application fee (Apphcahons submrlled 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app "__
~etin9 shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required.
I,CJ $729.00 legal Advertising Fee far CCPC meeting (to be reconciled "pan receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily
~NeWS)'
~. $363,00 legal Advertising Fee for BCC meeting
$2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee
~ Property Owner Notification fees, Property Owner Notifications $1.00 Non-certilied; $3.00 Certilied refurn
receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning & Development Review)
Fee Total $
PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW:
h Id b f d h P h d d t
Comments s ou e orwarde to t e lanner prior to t e ue ae
SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS & REC - Amanda Townsend
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT
DR/EM1 - EMER. MGMT - Jim Von Rintein IX UTILITIES ENGINEERING - Zamira Deltoro IX
CDES Coordinator - Linda B. Route Sheet 'i.
only
I
. Meeting Notes
.,r
- O"'S:::::>'''\<-c...-.~'~,...J-<''''
1'lAl'\..lS .
- Ell Jl.~t/)/lJitJ. 11//'[14/1:" /,V f:IS, /i-J'III/!f
1% (0 hC{.J?7f..; wctl/JI/;;' ,Ati v/)t;;-
- (..vet-tll/;;- fA/' Ill} j)oCU+rI.f.-rl--. E,4/I//J!vYJ/!f/Wd( ~ A IW;{f~I/&'
.
- c.ltCf/tH/07' 1,fb;fbltvF AE9vl;th/11I.r~1 tV .4Cco;!MA-t:E Jv//fI (;vl,ll.;A/f
..l.4<J~~: :;>U8MI/ ~l'iiT PJ//,,) w//VTr S;-<JBrft7l1l'-.-'f'S ~ L..k 4..,
- 3-
G:\Current\New Pre-Application Forms 2006\PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app
050404.doc
rl~
N~GENDA ITEM .
-_._.,,"--~.. I
~
;.:) <. "1..
Sf/" , ii!:n
U:~~~~~_, D -f- ct{~ i
--~"~;.
February 19, 2008
Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP
Principal Planner
Collier County Zoning and Land Development Review
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Subject: PUDA-2007-AR-1l283; Shadowwood PUD Amendment
Dear Ms. Gundlach,
Thank you for your continued coordination of the Shadowwood PUD Amendment (PUDA-2007-AR-
11283). After consulting with Comprehensive Planning Department staff, we have revised the PUD
Document and Master Plan to be in compliance with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP), inclusive of the Future Land Use Element. All of Tract D, Commercial, has
been added to Tract C, Private Air Park Tract. The originally requested area of 1.98,t acres has been
removed from Tract C and placed within Tract B, Single-family Residential. The PUD document has
been slruck through to update tract acreage amounts and to remove development standards for the
commercial area. The following density calculations indicate the methodology used to generate the five
additional single-family dwelling units needed by Wing South, Inc.:
Oril!inal Density:
Total Units/(Tracts A + B + C + E + Entrance) = 569 units!l57.8 acres = 3.6a upa
New Density:
Existing Residential Acreage x 3 units per acre = Consistent Density
Conversion of Commercial Bonus x Acreage = Units Beyond Base Density
157.8 acres x 3 units/acre = 473.4 units
9.77 unitslacre x 10.3 acres = 100.6 units
Total: 574 Units
We expect these revisions will address staffs concems regarding consistency with the GMP. We look
forward to returning to the Collier County Planning Commission for rehearing. I appreciate your
assistance in establishing new hearing dates as quickly as possible.
Sincerely,
Heidi K. Williams, AICP
Cc: Dan Murray
J
In
In
w
I~
Q
~ c(
ell ....
":; ;c
ell ::E
a:: I
w
0..
0
-; r
> a::
ell
Q w (l
a:l
"tI ::E '^
C fr (
D :;, ...
.... Z r.J (\
W I
OJ z if
0 ~
~ t-l VI
:I: ~
A. ...P
lP E--
lP ...
~ ~ 0
~ -
C
== = ell .,.
E 0
" . = rJJ - ;;;
.. ~
,. D '" .... 0>
.... ~ 0.. .. A. ->
. III ell w ~
~ Q .. Q
"tI N
:= ~ - "tI -- 0
c. c( i?i
C;
~ D -i:i
""'" ::E "
rJJ U)
h I .;;
w ~
t "
0
'0
,...:
W
=-- W
J:
""'" CJl
.. ~ ;;;
VI ..... Z
\.II "- <=> (9
3 S9
<!>
0
0
N
U)
E
~
0
u.
c:
.2
16
.S?
w Ci
0-
~ ,::E <j:
..Q I~ ~
E ll..
::l ~
Z z
'"
III c:
~
C ~
0 :J
O.
" .c -
A. <!:i
t\
I~ I
\I) ~
\I)
w
= :~
c
c
-c( ~
...
:;;: :--J
:::: ~\
I ~
W
~
= ~
w
cD N
::::
::) '-(\
z
w ~
z I
0
::E: '" i
ll.. I
,j
.... "-
ll.. \~ I
w
c
--
z ~
0::::
iii=
>i:i: ~
Q .. ~
>- 0
....
Z
::) ~
0
V
"-
~
~ ,
\~J I
''-1\
W ~
::::
-c(
z
~
,..;
I ~
,
11(j
N~GENDA ITEM
-----........
SFF "
'~Ir',[c::5q c.c <1,c,
--. '
..,.
o
;;;
N
0;
,;
~
N
o
iii
as
-0
.,
'"
'S:
~
'-'
o
-0
c:
UJ
UJ
I
if)
!;
Z
CJ
in
iO
o
o
N
'"
E
5
u.
c
.f!
;;;
.\1
C.
.f
.,
a:
~
z
E
~
:;
y
(;
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
. SEP f) G ?nftR
. '!,i 2'.
-----=::,:o:::~-1...tl
Please complete the following AND FAX (239-659-5724) OR SUBMIT IN PERSON TO THE -,
ADDRESSING SECTION, FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY ADDRESSING PERSONNEL PRIOR TO PRE-
APPLICATION MEETING. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required.
1. Legal description of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
SHA.DOWWOOD A1Rl' ARK SOUTH ' I ~ - 50 - z.-c", .
2. Folio (Property ID) number(s) of above (attach to. or associate with. legal description ifmore than one)
73284000507
3. Street address or addresses (as applicable. if already assigned)
4226 SKYWAY DR
4. Location map, showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way (attach)
5. Copy of survey (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES)
6. Proposed project name (if applicable)
7. Proposed Streetnal)1es (if applicable)
8. Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJECTS/SITES ONLY)
SOP
c" 9. Petition Type - (Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type)
DSDP (Site Development Plan)
o SDPA (SDP Amendment)
o SDPI (SDP Insubstantial Change)
o SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
o SIPI (SIPIInsubstantial Chaoge)
o SNR (Street Name Change)
o Vegetation/Exotic (Veg. Removal Permits)
['gj Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use,
Boat Dock Ext., Rezone, PUD rezone, etc.)
o Other c Describe:
o PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
o PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
o FP (Final Plat)
o LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
o BL (Blasting Permit)
o ROW (Right-of-Way Permit)
o EXP (Excavation Permit)
o VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit)
o TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
10. Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if
applicable; indicate whether proposed or existing)
11. Please Check One: ['gj Checklist is to be Faxed Back 0 Personally Picked Up
12. Applicant Name Sharon Umoenhour Phone 239-947-1144 Fax 239-947-0375
J 3. Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to
further review by the Addressing Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primary Number \'1>4.0,0 S
Address Number I'6L\-~D""
Address Number
Address Number
~
Approved by 10L",-,;d
''\^ .--J n
. ; \Uh'::-"--
Date \D - q~O("
PUDA-2007-AR-1l283 REV: 1
SHADOWWOOD PUD
_ Project: 19990174
Date: 2120/07 DUE: 3120107
, ~:
I ~
N~~EN.DAI}:~M
Sf:. 1',,: II b
Pfo~.'1b -~f='q,b.'-
~...- ............,.:,0....._..-'-:;..0;
-'--ovo~ >I:lO~I"jVH )>I<mSnll~ _,___
~~H",- ::J
~ "' ~ z Z Z ~
ZO
,.z
0'"
o I w
:) V1aJ
"- W '"
o '" ~
w "',.
a:~V1~
O:s:W~
O_t:J.:!:
<(~:!t.:l
-,~:r:tI1
~OUw
-f-OI
~O~!-U
O~5~.::!
~Vl~~m
t-- <(-:::;;
~:;::~~~
OZZ......~
0::00 a::
lLf=W ~I-
O~I :JO
wt-I-n::1-
3~ui ~Vl
O::.....JZZt5
~2~~~
O::~> G:r:
V1<(W:)0
<(UO:: 0>-
::;: .....JO::O::
I---Z<l:Ic;{
5i::52i7~
):0...;= ~U5
Clw"~ ii:/D
~~
!:!It;:;~ 1I1;:
~~3~3
w
~
o
z
1
I~
I~
~
m
~
ffi
,
~
--<::::))
~.:;:/.
!:;
0.
31
~!i'
d~U
~i:, 1.1
...i! -
~ i ~~ ~ ~
61. i 1
~l!1 !
::iii"
"I
c;~
: 3 : i ~
.
PI'
,
!
j
i
I
I
II
r )
/, I
Ii ---/,
;1 __~
I( ~-
,,\~
'~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I~-' q r 0
ii
'I
"
-
"
"
W
" ~
- z
,; 0
- ~
~
~
~ r~
Ii :i
\:i J
--)~_.-'=-~~
~-- "'\\
\
I
w
~
5
~
.
~
~
:i ~
i ~
,
W 0
<
~
~
\
)'
(~-_..I
I ----I
\\ I
\\ t I
('J
)/ :1
Ii \
\\ \
"'.>{
11;~i
!I ~
1\ "
Ii ~~..
~\\~-,/
"'.
\;
\,
\,
~~-
11
~ I)
"<::" )
" //
~ -~
W W
g g
'I
r
,I
I
I'
II
J~~
;/\ 1\
c/" \,
i'
J
.:/
'1
"I
2074928 OR: 2203 PG OQ1f3ENDA ITEM
DClIID/D II OmelAl UClIlDl,f ClIU1 CORrI.n---'-_._
allOSI" It 1I:21111il1a! I. IIGCI. U ~CD n "
call t llM':-tl ! fi 20UR
DC P Il,OI
DOe-. lio:-!tIl__Lt- \ ..f-1101'
----~.,..,,.~~l,
lttD:
mUll mill I! II
21lD colon GAIlIli! '20'
IAPUSlllll'S
..... III N_: 73284000S07
0...... II T1N:
Warranty Deed
ThIs Indentu"" Mille lhi, 25th day of
THB ROOKERY, LTO., a FLORIDA
June, 1996 '.0.
limited partnership
Bel_a
of" C_yur . Sla..,o( ,anmor. ....
WING SOUTH AIRPARK PRIVATE VILLAS,INC., a Florida not-for-profit
corporation,
.... ...~-.: 4130 SKYWAY DR NAPLES Fl 33942
or.. C-r of COLLIER SlUe ", FLORIDA , (l'aDtee.
WitDes5etb datI the OL\NTOR, for aDd ill UMlalQ.,,.tiOtl 01"" IUIt\ uf - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - TEN , NOjlOO($lO.OO) - - - - - - - - - - ~.
"oa..r.ood.nd...llIoIbk~OMick",lioJI.w G~ iallQdpaidb)' OIlANTEE, Uwreo;.iptwhel'Nfil~11/;~"""_
....... barraiDDd.not....w w 11M Mid OI.AHTEE aod ORAHTEB'$ ......_ ud ....... M'".r, lbo rouo.iat o;!.KnloM~.
...., J,Urt: Uld"tIlI ilIliM C....y of COLLIER ~ uI Florida 10 wit:
SEE A'M'ACHED EXHIBIT A$~~D HADE A PART HEREOF.
TOGETHER with all~h~. ementa, hered;~nts and appurtenances
thereto belonqing 0 iee pertaining T9 have and to hold
the same in tee 51 pl rev \
./ \,
The Crantor herebr c ' tee that Grantor is
lawfully seized Of sin ~. 5 e that Grantor has
qood riqht and la tll u 0 i sel n nvey said land;
and that said lan (T .'0 a nc a~8 except
r.strictions and ents common ~ .~ivision,
outstanding oil, q ~ nd. ml~.e:al . .'e t7~~ of record, it any.
\1- C
"-91>':'-' ,,,-j\'<'"
~"LEC\r>C/
&Il4"1f"iIlI*'t'6IM.be,"br~Uy wamaM1MlidlIlo-'dlud,Uld..WdcCc:.-l\h'..motrlma IIwftlJ~IINntofa1lpll~~.
'I~_"i~
Warranty
Deed
.Pqc2
NAGENDA J
0, _'__,_~~_,.~
--I
t
OR: 2203 PG: 0077
...... m N..-...r. 73284000507
Whereof, t.bt If'UlIDt ll.I. hem/No Wll hi. b.tlld ud JNJ \be .u.y .ud yur At-..
our pnoa>tt: THE ROOKERY, LTD.
By:
,,, CLIFFDJUl WINGER
GENERAL PARTNER
!1
:i p
aDM.___LW
---'
(Sod)
If iJPN~":
,
Printed Name:
Witness
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
n.. ....~ inII"'_al wu a.lAo""a.J,1Ul before IN: thi, 25th .by or June. l'96 It,
CLIFFORD WINGER, GENERAL PARTNER on behalf of THE ROOKERY, LTD.,
. FLORIDA Limited _.
IN.. ~ u.owllloaw or...bo boll produc:e4 hi.
..MIeIlli(lIIlli"".
, , , ,
, .
lll1lI nc-.-. PnpIU'Oll 'y:
~W.""".h,.".
aw.-.. o.lIk, ........... a.o.. P.A.
1IMO GuYM (11M Pukway"" 206
~ fIL 33M2
Printed Naae:
____~OT....Y rulUC
~~\t"R~COUJ\,~"'''''
,..0 . l'~' . _II 0'''''''- MOa;;;-...
\.,.1 ~ ~ aUJlI"UCI
('I CO....ION MUllII"
(~~~~~TID )~:\ Ii .~!or:;.~::+"::
nty\.Wq: Ie-
\~~ ~~J
\.' "'\.0
-(t' C.
~):~ /Zy
~~o/
.
; ,( /:-., --.L:)
'1~Jn't'_~.':::
\.J-lj
.;j I J H... J. ,", 'jU~ '_bl
PAGE 04
r
=
~t!I
"'if
'"
'"
,., ""
~g
'"
~ :5
~~
r'...;,l l..'IlSG(R5
c
c
l ~ i i i J
(
002250
P~CE
N~GENDA ITEM
-~
WIL.SO~. MIL.L.lft, SARTON. SOL.L. · nile" INC. j 0;:~ j J
HOfUSI~ INGINltl~. "-ANNfl~ AND t.ANCl 'UAvt'TOAl . t J008
eXHIBIT "~~!L"-~l/ _3 b ~~l!l,
-~.
/
j
OR SOO~
De'c~iptlc" Dr p.~t or ieatlon It. ToWnl~lp ~o IOW'"_
a.ng. U ta.t. ColUu' CD\lI\tr. '1.ol';.d..
.......10..'* rlR' 2203 PG: 0078 u*
'fh. .....rl ~,~.~ .
..u
tn'l
12./3..1 is
W.C. uan
...,. ';. ie-u, tWLl;lltjet IOUth)
~t.. . :u-u...u
"
----
~..........,,~.-:..
. ~ .....r:u-,.
r..~~':"'''''''
"1;,_
".. ......................-..._.....u_..... ._.. ..I.......~.. ._..... .............".. .......... .._......
.-.....",.......... .............. ............. ..".1, "_' ....'~nl... .....,......... _.. .......
AFFIDAVIT
. nf N~~:~.~~~E;'.~r,.,_ I
' I C, ~rlr'<J
~ ,I '
%p
-~_I,
We/I, P~.c<z- Go. ~~o"" ~\\4,~--= W..."..~-being first duly sworn, depose
,
and say that we/I am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is
the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in
this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data,
and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application,
are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that
the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and
that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall
not be altered, Public hearings wiil not be advertised until this application is
deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted.
As property owner We/I further authorize O. Grady Minor & Associates. P.A. to
act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
~~:~o:rty Owo"
Signature of Property Owner
PZ\..:o... G-. ~G""'''''
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
~(lZ\ ,~,4.-;-
~,~ Cr s:;,,,,,,,,,, -:;:,---,
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
". t-O
Th~regoing instrument was acknowlegped before me this :2 2- day of
J::>""v""^"1 ,200 7 ,by/<"/~/ G,c.Y?1- 4o/~ whois
personally known to me or has produced F /.,.,.-, rl~ cJA'1 1./... r L.I"'-'" ""~as
identification.
~
~
State of Florida
County of =c?L-<"-/t'O:"\,
(Signatu of Notary Public
State of Florida)
JAIRO GUTIERREZ
"'a' ..\. Notary Public, State 01 Florida
~ ... Commission# DO 564847
My comm. el:pires June 25. 2010
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6/14/04
Division of Corporations
b::a~;
"
(jj!'ll"f'dill!'l"
.... ... . t .. ....,.... .
lllnr",.sunhiz.nr,~
., t.
~ J!I~~I~..
... ."., '....
Florida Department of Sf at 1', Dil'ision ofCorroratioTls
Public InqWrY
N~~ ITEM
--
SEP Or; .
Pg 4-s,.v r.. 2.~ODcoR
~~-s::1b
~~.-
Florida Non Profit
WING SOUTH, INC.
---.,.-.---..,---,-----..-...----.--.-----..-.---------.._--,---_._,_._..__..._--~-_._--------,_._--~_._--
, .,..... -. .............................,..................................... .", .......... .....---...
PUDA-2007-AR-1l283 REV: 1
SHADOWWOOD PUD
Project: 19990174
Date: 2/20107 DUE: 3120/07
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
4310 SKYWAY DRIVE
NAPLES FL 34113 US
Changed 04/28/2006
~
MAILING ADDRESS
4985 E T AMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES FL 34113 US
Changed 04/28/2006
Document Number
723949
FEI Number
592528568
Date Filed
07/25il972
State
FL
Status
ACTIVE
Effective Date
NONE
Last Event
NAME CHANGE
AMENDMENT
Event Date Filed
07119/2001
Event Effective Date
NONE
eglstere .gen
I Name & Address I
HART, STEVE
4985 E T AMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES FL 34113
I Name Changed' 04(28/2006 I
I Address Changed: 04/28/2006 I
R
dA
t
~--------,-------------_.
,.., ...,-.....,-,....,...............,.......,.,...,.........".-..."........,."........-,.,..,......,...".---...."'...
I Name & Address II Title I
BOLTON, PETER D
3409 SKYWA Y DR
NAPLESFL34112
I HOLDER, STEVEN II I
Officer/Director Detail
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripls/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl=723949&n2=NAMFWD&n3=...1/29/2007
Divi~ion of Corporations
Page 2 00
I 4096 SKYWA Y DR I~
NAPLES FL 34112 AGENDA ITEM
EDMANSON, TRACY [J No. -'--~-.~_r~".._
3904 SK YW A Y DR.
SEr ,) ~~nrlC "
NAPLES FL 34112 ,
Pg= Y ~~:}1~ ~
KASER, JAMES [J ,
4119 SKYWA Y DRIVE ,
~-----
NAPLES FL 34113
HART, STEVE G
4985 E TAM/AMI TR.A..JL
NAPLES FL 34113
)1B
I
------~._._"._"._"-,-_.~------_.,-,._~..._~_._- ,..-.-".,.-..--.--
-...0....'..---......,
nnua epo s
I Report Year II Filed Date I
I 2004 II 04/26f1004 I
I 2005 II 05/05/2005 I
I 2006 II 04128.~OO6 I
A
lR
rt
Previous Filing
Return to List
YieYL)::yents
Yie\\,-Name_J-listory
NextFiling I
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
04/28L2.QQ(i-=-A1\INU ALRJ:1'9.R.J
QS!OSL200S....-:,Al'iN REEr'\..f!'!jfQRM~UsJ<._!':1'
04/26[2QQ4 -- ANN REPJJ1NIFORM BUS_REP
QSIQ;;[2003 -- ANN REl'i]JNIFQRM BUS REP
!l3J14i21l..Q2....= COR_,_Al'iN REP1UNJF0l31v1 BUS REP
P7/19j2P_O..L=-Nam~. <;:h.anll"
92/0S/200J..::..@l'LBJ:PIUNIFORM B_VSJtE.J'
Q6/05.L200Q.::.ANJ'-i l<_Ee/UNIFORM BJJ.s...l<E.I'
P4jQ6D299 -- ANN VAL REPORT
Q2/.091l998-=..ANNUALREPOR T
P !.!.3l!.199L:_Al'INUAl-REPORT
P3!PJiL!.996...::..l2.'1!i_AN1'IlJ..A...t. REPORT
Ol!301I 99S -- Annual Rel!.Ql1
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFlL&nl=723949&n2=NAMFWD&n3=...1 /29/2007
, .
'2006 NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT
FILED
Apr 28, 2006
Secretary of State
DOCUMENT# 723949
Entity Name: WING SOUTH, ING.
N~_~~!2:~ I
' SEP ') C ;J'Ir.I".
'p U<1 Ii'"
~~ec:tc~L'1!o!
---"-;'-~-;,'
Current Principal Place of Business:
New Principal Place of Business:
4310 SKWVAY DRIVE
NAPLES, FL 34112 US
4310 SKWVAY DRiVE
NAPLES, FL 34113 US
Current Mailing Address:
New Mailing Address:
PO. BOX 110156
NAPLES, FL 34108 US
4985 E T AMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES. FL 34 113 US
FE! Number: 59-2528568
FEI Number Applied For I .
FEI Number Not Applicable ( I
Certificate of Status Desired ( )
Name and Address of New R.egistered Agent:
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:
WHITE, WILLIAM 0
2310 DELLA DR
NAPLES. FL 34117 US
HART. STEVE
4985 E T AMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 34113 US
Tl'1e above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both,
in the State of Florida,
SIGNATURE: STEVE HART
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
04/28/2006
Date
ADDITIONSICHANGES TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
Title: ASM ( ) Delete
Name: WHITE, WilLIAM 0
Address: 2310 DELLA DR.
City-S1.Zip: NAPLES, FL 34117
Title: DVP ( ) Delete
Name: MYERS, ROY
Address: 3874 SKYWAY DR
City-St-Zip: NAPLES, Fl 34112
Title: D ( ) Delete
Name' ETTER, ROBERT
Address: 3940 SKYWAY DR,
City-8t-Zip: NAPLES, FL 34112
Title' DT ( ) Delete
Name: KASER, JAMES
Address: 4119 SKYWAY DRIVE
City-st-Zip: NAPLES, Fl 34112
Title: DAT ( ) Delete
Name: HARRY, BOB
Address: 4084 SKYWAY DRIVE
Clty-St-Zip: NAPLES, FL 34112
Title: D (X) Delete
Name: MURRY. ROBERT
Address: 711 HILLSDALE
City-st-Zip: WYANDOTTE, MI 48192
Title:
Name:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
Title:
Name:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
Title:
Name:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
Title:
Name:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
Title:
Name:
Address:
City-St-Zip:
Title:
Name:
Address:
Clty-St-Zip:
PO (X) Change ( ) Addition
BOLTON, PETER
3409 SKYVI/AY DR
NAPLES, FL 34112
VD (X) Change ( ) Addition
HOLDER, SlEVEN
4096 Sr::fWAY DR.
NAPLES, FL 34112
SO (X) Change ( ) Addition
EDMANSON, TRACY
3904 SKYWAY DR,
NAPLES, FL 34112
DT (X) Change ( ) Addition
KASER, JAMES
4119 SKYVVAY DRIVE
NAPLES, Fl 34113
ATO (X) Change ( ) Addition
HART,STEVE
4985 E TNvlIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES. FL 34113
( ) Change ( ) Addition
I hereby certify that the information supplied with this filing does not qualify for the for the exemption stated in Chapter I I 9,
Florida Statutes, I further certify that the information indicated on thiS report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that
my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation Dr
the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears
above, or on an attachment with an address, with all other like empowered,
SIGNATURE: PETER SOL TON
Electronic Signature of Signing Officer or Director
PO
04/28/2006
Date
\l~
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
The undersigned do hereby swear or affum that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners ofre
commonly known as 4226 Skvwav Drive
Naples. Florida 34112
(Street address and City, State and Zip Code)
N~GENDA ITEM 7
r. d O.f SI-~~' Ii.. erty. ~. ~.' '~.-.
Fp f) '.",..
i ,..,i.' ,! /', i'~
J:ft~':;L~.. of ~ ,
-----._~~---,:
and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for an amendment to Shadowwood
planned unit development LPUD) zoning. We hereby designate f'E.TT'P q P-:>'OLTOI'>I
legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to
legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority
includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans,
surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to
authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new Of amended covenant of unified control is
delivered to Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of
development of the project:
I. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed
on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development
rezoning.
2, The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all tenns, conditions, safeguards, and
stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in
part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or
safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development
Code.
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within
the planned unit development must be consistent with those tenus and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms.
safeguards. and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance,
The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development
and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the oject is brought into compliance with all terms,
conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development.
Owner
,/'f.. -
C)-i'~ -
wner
Printed Name
~ ",,'d. ~ 0'Cl "
Printed Name
~ (lZi,">i"~'"
~\\4..1S ~~\"..~ ~-...\.'-
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF co'-'-'~
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this
R. ~,/ GyC'" f 60) ~
NeT>" de. dYl.N 1" ! Ie... as iden' ation.
, ._0 ~
2 Z . day of J;:''''' va, "-r , 200..?by
lA\
JAIRO GUTIERREZ
Notary Public. State of Florida
Commissionll DO 564B47
My comm. eKpires June 25. 2010
who is personaUyknown to me or has produced
lie e-- ~~
/ff/tv tG-wl?eJ1A==?
ame typed. printed or stamped)
(Serial Number. if any)
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 6114/04
i.
NAG
o.
ADDRESSING CHECK} -1ST
d 'Lf ,,'1
P lease complete the following AND FAX (239-659-5724) OR SUBMIT IN PERSON TO ~ ~, D(. '1,A:,
ADDRESSING SECTION. FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY ADDRESSING PERSONNEL PRIOR i75~ ~
APPLICATION MEETING, Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required.
1. Legal description of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
SHADOWWOOD AIRPARK SOUTH . I ~ - 50 - c:-(" .
2. Folio (Property ID) number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description ifmore than one)
73284000507
3, Street address or addresses (as applicable, if already assigned)
4226 SKYWAY DR
4. Location map, showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way (attach)
5. Copy of survey (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES)
6. Proposed project name (if applicable)
7. Proposed Street nalPes (if applicable)
8. Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJECTS/SITES ONLY)
SDP_
9. Petition Type _ (Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type)
DSDP (Site Development Plan)
DSDP A (SDP Amendment)
o SDPI (SDP Insubstantial Change)
o SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
o SIPI (SIPI lnsubstantial Change)
o SNR (Street Name Change)
o Vegetation/Exotic (Veg. Removal Permits)
o Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use,
Boat Dock Ex!., Rezone, PUD rezooe, etc.)
o Other - Describe:
o PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
o PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
o FP (Final Plat)
o LLA (Lot Line Adjustroent)
o BL (Blasting Permit)
o ROW (Right-of-Way Permit)
o EXP (Excavation Permit)
o VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit)
o TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
10. Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if
applicable; indicate whether proposed or existing)
11. Please Check One: 0 Checklist is to be Faxed Back 0 Personally Picked Up
12, Applicant Name Sharon Umpenhour Phone 239-947-] 144 Fax 239-947-0375
] 3. Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to
further review by the Addressing Section.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primary Number \<;;(..\,.0,0 S
Address Number \'6L\-"iD(~
Address Number
Address Number
Approved by .d\L",-,~..d fV\G]( e..-
Date Ie) -'1-0<;
PUDA_2007-AR-1l283 REV: 1
SHADOWWOOD PUD
Project: 19990174
Date: 2/20107 DUE: 3/20107
N~~E.._~~.':'J.-~EM~I
0EP' ".
~ - )n~;~,;
,-l:li~~,Th_ .Df-.-U;
-- ~~ ---'....;......--.:;~~_J
/~.~~il~\
/~~/\~ .w,~\
/<Iid!~I.. ~,~.\
i \l L . ~t~X'>:::.~_j."
! '~~ ..._~~t:";;;;; 0;"
~: S \ ., "11:g:~~!O ,':J
\?\" "'J'" . r" /~l
'\ '----.. ,,///'
'-'" ".Y
<-"., "c.J___l.-"'.....
COLLIER COUNTY
WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REOlJIRED HISTORICAL AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY ANn ASSESSMENT
DATE SUBMITTED:
PLANNER: Ravmond V. Bellows. Zoning Manager
PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER:
(To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff)
PROJECT NAME: Shadowwood PUD Amendment
LOCATION: (Common Description) A portion of Section 16. Township 50 South. Range
26 East; the site is generally located one mile west of CR 951 (Collier Boulevard) on the
north side of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road.
SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The subject property has been cleared and
utilized as an accessory to the private air park. including the runway and maintenance
facilities.
(Properties located within illl arca of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a
low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development
& Environmental Services Administrator or his designee to waive the requirement for a
Historical/ Archacological Survcy illld Asscssmcnt. Once the waivcr application has bccn
suhmittcd, it shall be reviewed illld acted upon within fivc (5) working days. The waivcr
request shall adequately demonstTate that the area has low potential for
historical/archaeological sites.)
Hi~t(lri(' P:'~':cn:ati()r.,'Fi)nns!lli3IH)4
llB
N~~~NDA ITEM
~
SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA : SFP 'l'1 ?nO,9
A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as o~-L 6+ 110
holder, contract pUfchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Wing South. Inc. ~-.)
Mailing Address: 4130 SkYway Drive. Naples. Florida 34112
Phone:
FAX:
B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: Heidi K. Williams
Mailing Address: Q. Gradv Minor and Associates. P.A.. 3800 Via Del Rev. Bonita
SDrin~s. Florida 34134
Phone: (239) 947-1144
FAX: 239-947-0375
Name of owner(s) of property: Wing: South. Inc.
Mailing Address: 4130 SkYWay Drive. Naples. Florida 34112
Phone:
FAX:
**Please see zoning authorization (copy attached)
Note: Ifnames in answers to A and/of B .u'e different than oame in C, notarized
letter(s) of authorization from prope:tty owne:t. (C) must be attached.
SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy ofthe plat book page
(obtainable fi'om Clerk's Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.)
A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only I or 2, as applicable.
I. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County.
Subdivision Name: _Wing_South Condo
Plat Book 4
Page_46_Unit
Block
Lot
Section 16
Township _50
Range _26
Historic PI\~:'ierv(\tk)lliF(}m;$/1 ]/3(}.:04
2
r N~~E~.~~.'~:~~. I'
I BEl- "1'
I [Jg~~~2~"L4~~ II
ll()
2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is
sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial
photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range.
If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may
describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each
individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual
parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject
any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property,
and may require a certified surveyor boundary sketch to be submitted.
B. Property dimensions:
Area:
square feet, or 1.980,
acres
Width along roadway: 5120, feet along SkYWay Drive
Depth: 13 50, feet
C. Present use of property: Undeveloped. Private Air Park
D. Present zoning classification: PUD. Shadowwood Planned Unit Development
SECTION THREE: WAlVER CRITERIA
Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or
historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be
evidcnce that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been
cxcavated as a quan')'. The Community Devclopmcnt & Environmcntal Serviccs
Administrator may seek counsel of the chairman of the Historic and Archaeological
Preservation Board when it is not completely evident that the site is without
archaeological or historic value.
A. Waiver Request Justification.
1. lnterpretation of Aerial Photograph Acrial photograph demonstrates that the
subiect propertv has been altered for development of an airpark runway.
Surrounding properties are developed with residential uses.
2. Historical Land Use Description: The property has been utilized for support of
the private airpark for over 25 years.
3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: Vacant property that has been
cleared for many years.
4. Other: The site is not located within an area identified as having potential
archeological silplificance. The propertv has been "reYiouslv cleared for
development purposes.
Hisrnri,: Prt;~j'.',y"lion'F"rn"'-/ll iJU/[l-1
3
A €
NO.~
Sfp., 1
L!!~;~ r
--':--...._~ i'
B. The Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator or his designee
may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. The official
decision regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In
the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the
reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Community
Development & Environmental Services Administrator or his designee regarding a
waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision
of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the
Board of County Commissioners.
SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION
A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application,
Any time defays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or
incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and
shall be a permanent part of the file.
C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold
to fit into a legal size (8 Yz" x 14") folder.
Signature of Applicant or Agent
'~AfJ'
Printed Name of Applicant or Agent
Heidi Williams
-TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DlVISION-
SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION
The Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator or designee has made the
following determination:
I.
Approved on:
By:
2.
Approved with Conditions on:
(see attached)
By:
3.
Denied on:
(see attached)
By:
f-li"fork f'rest.'1yation/F'JTIw,/l 1!30i!l4
4
--f N~~ENDA II t:M"'-J
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PRok.::,'S<~!:'~~hJ3
FOR PUD REZONEREQUEST
I.... .
'.".'".,",'i'
APPLICANT INFORfY:1ATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) WING SOUTH, INC.
ADDRESS 4130 Skyway Drive STATE FL
ZIP34112
FAX #
TELEPHONE #
E-MAil ADDRESS:
CEll #
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE):
I .
.,,:;,
l~G.A~ DESCRIPTION
Section/Township/Range 16 / SOS / 26E
Lot: Block: Subdivision:AIRPARK SOUTH OF SHADOW WOOD
Plat Book 19 Page #: 79 Property I.D.#:73284000507
Metes & Bounds Description: See Attached
I . TY.PE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDE:P
(Check applicable system):
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPO capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM
o
x
o
o
o
TY.. PEOF WATI:R SERVICI: TO BEPIWVIDI:. bi'
.. ......,.. ...... .,.,.-",. ., ,. ,'......,..;.... j...' ..... ..... ." ...;....
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM X
b, CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM 0
PROVIDE NAME _____________________________
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WEll) 0
TQTftit POPULATIOltTO BE SERVED: 1 0
A B
No!!.:!!OA /fE
-....... M
; C'r~ '-_
, vet' 'l'
~~~%
-~.
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2
PfAK AND AVERACe;PAICYQEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 2310 GPD AVERAGE DAILY
B. SEWER-PEAK 1300 GPD AVERAGE DAILY
1540 GPD
1000
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED
2008
f!lAR.M'tN!'$tATEM,~!'itf Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and
schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a
specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If
percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved
shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
Proposed 5 lot subdivision is located north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. It
is part of the South County Water System and Wastewater System.
Sanitary sewer connection will be by extension of the existing 8" sewer
gravity sewer. Existing wastewater pump station has adequate capacity,
Water system connection will be by connection to the existing water main on
opposite side of the road and extension of services to new lots.
Anticipated water/wastewater demands:
. Water at 154 GPDC @ 2.0 person /unit
ADF 5 x 2 x 154 = 1540 GPO
MMDF 1540 GPD x 1,5 = 2310 GPO
. Wastewater at 100 GPDC @ 2.0 persons/unit
ADF 5 x 2 x 100 = 1000 GPO
MMDF 1000 x 1.3 = 1300 GPO
Peak Hourly Fiow = 1000 (4.41 )/24
= 184 GPH
..
, I"'ut:NOA i~r..:;-y---.
iJY~}~:;~l,hj)
cotiiiiE~icGUNIYi'UIJI.:ITYPEQj:(;A.TidNW$Tj!i>.TEMENt: If the project is located
within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system,
written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier
County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within
the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in
accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time.
This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system
development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities
Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable,
the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the
appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
~tAt~~Et'ltof ~V.AILABlllty tAPACIIYFRQMi OTMERI'R.Q\{IQEt{$:Unless
waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the
project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other
than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is
adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided,
\15
ORDINANCE NO. 08-
N~GE:NDA '-"<-
-___ 'eM
---...:.-
: SEP:IG?n
i Pg '5 7 ..+ -,.OR
'-.""."'-""'''''''',,~ C( h
---._-~~
~--~~_.J
^ ~_.. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 82-49, THE SHADOWWOOD PUD, BY AMENDING THE
COVER PAGE; BY AMENDING THE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE;
BY AMENDING SECTION 4.2, PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE
TRACTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 4.6, TRACT D COMMERCIAL
TO DELETE THE ENTIRE SECTION; BY AMENDING SECTION
4.4.C, MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS; BY AMENDING SECTION
5.2.A, PUD MASTER PLAN; BY REPLACING THE PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED MASTER PLAN WITH A NEW MASTER PLAN
SHOWING REVISED TRACT BOUNDARIES; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Wing South, Inc., represented by Heidi K. Williams, AICP, ofQ. Grady Minor
& Associates, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the ShadowWood
PUD (Ordinance Number 82-49).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO COVER PAGE OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49,
SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
The Cover Page of the Development Plan (also known as the Planned Unit Development
Document), previously attached as Exhibit "A" to Ordinance Number 82-49 for ShadowWood
PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows:
PREPARED BY:
WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC.
1383 Airport Road North
Naples, PL 33924
Words "\rusk through are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page I of7
.
.
.
REVISED BY:
N~~ENO~.~~lV~ /\ J n
v-,' tv
~tJ'::lf!i~'.~;
_1C'!:l. -2~ ,;fcl~ L~.
O. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES
3800 Via Del Rev
Bonita Springs. FL 34134
SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 82-49, SHADOWWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
The Table of Contents Page of the Development Plan (also known as the Planned Unit
Development Document), of Ordinance Number 82-49, the ShadowWood PUD, is hereby amended
to read as follows;
TABLE OF CONI'ENTS
PAGE
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
1-2
SECTION II
STATEMENT OF INTENT
3
SECTION ill
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
4
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
5 - 14
TRACTS A & E - MULTI-FAMlLYRESIDENTIAL
TRACT B - SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TRACT C - PRIVATE AIR PARK DISTRICT
TPv\CT D COMMERCL^.L
Wards stniel: truTl:1.;h are deleted; words underlined are added,
Page 2of7
.
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
ll~
N~~:,,!DA 'I€M
St--' . -----.
'. c:.t' '} " I?
15 -all'''.~. ' .1M
-~:}~f-- S6
"-~~~.J
SECTION V
SECTION THREE: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 4.2, ENTITLED "PROJECT PLAN
AND LAND USE TRACTS" OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49,
SHADOWWOOD PUD
Section 4.2 entitled "Project Plan and Land Use Tracts" of the Development Plan (also
known as the Planned Unit Development Document) of Ordinance Number 82-49, the
ShadowWood PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows:
4.2. PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS:
For the purposes of gross residential land use area, the subject property is :168.1 acres. The project
plan including street layout and land uses is illustrated in Exhibit "B", POO Master Plan, Wilson,
MilleT, BaRon, Sell & Peel~ lBe., Drawing File Ne. HZ 59, The project shall consist of five land use
tracts of general area and configuration as shown in Exhibit "B".
J
Tracts A & E - Multi-family Residential
Tracts B - Siogle Family Residential
Tract C - Private Air Park District
Traet D Commereial
Entrance Drive
Total Area
: 113.3 Acres
: ;h;l5.68 Acres
: ;;+.&46.1 Acres
1. 10.3 f,eres
: 3.0 Acres
oiM&+ 168.08 Acres
Assuming favorable economic and market conditions, it is the project sponsor's intent to
complete development of the property within six years,
The total maximum residential units will be ~574 units at a maximum density of ~ 3.4 units per
gross acre.
SECTION FOUR: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 4.6, TRACT "D" COMMERCIAL OF
ORDINANCE 82-49 SHADOWWOOD PUD
Section 4.6 entitled "Tract 'D' Commercial of the Development Plan (also known as the Planned Unit
Development Document) of Ordinance No. 82-49, the ShadowW ood POO is hereby deleted in its entirety as
follows:
1.6, TPv\CT "D" COMMERCIAL
/..... P1hlJ8se:
Words '!rusk t1wallgB are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 3 of7
.
.
.
I N~GENDA"EM--~
\ 1 K2-$~;~'-' -~-- --- I
_~~,&;u .f' <1h'
The pllfjlase aflliiG SeetiaR is ta set forti! ilie Elevelopment plaT! .RElIar..a regulatioRs for llle-
""eas aes;gaataa OR FVO Master Plan as Tract "0", Commereial.
B.
Uses Permitted:
No lmilaiRg ar stmcrore, ar part IllCreaf, sHall Be ereetea, alterea or usee!, ar laBa llSea, in
'.Yflale er part, f-er elfler than tfle fallav,".Rg:
I. Peffilittea Prineipal Uses aRa SSU6!ures:
a) Mlt;'!lle sflops; art srne!ias; art s>lppl)' sflaps; a'liatioR fueliRg [aeilities wilflallt
repairs; aviatiea maiBtenanee aRE! seniee shElP, aiIfllaBe fllHigers ana tie ae'.~,'Rs.
ae!ministmtiaR BllilaiRg.
B) Balcery sflaps; BarBer BRa Belffily SHal'S; sati! s"!'l'ly stares; sie)'cle sales BRa
serliees; Bl>lepriHt saaps; BaakBinaers; saBk steres; SHSmess maeffina sllfV'iees.
c) Chur"hes ana ather plaees ofwersHip; elathiRg stares; eeeklaillalmges; ea"""ereial
reereatieR >lses maaar; semmereial sCfloals; seRfeetieRBry fiRa SBRay steres.
a) Delieatess8lls; elmg stares; Elry oIeamRg sHeps; my gaaas stares; BRa Elrapef)' saeps.
1) Flerist saeps.
g) GaraeR s,,!,ply steres e>ltside display iB siae aaa rear yards; gift Saal'S; gelffiRet
sflep&.-
a) HaraYlare stares; health faea steres.
i) ree eream steres.
j) Je'llelry stores.
I) LallRelries self ser..iee aRly; leather gaee!s; legitimate tbeatres; li,!llor steres;
leelESmiths.
m) Markets feea and/or meat; meaieal e[flees aRa eliBies; milliHe!)' shops; museums;
musie stores.
R) News stores.
B) Offiee geReral; office slip!,ly stere.
!') Paim aaa wallpaper stores; pet Gael's; pet sllj'lply sheps; paetogr<>phie e,!"iplReRt
stores; petter-I steres; !,riRtiHg; pHblisRiBg Bfla lRimeogrill'h se."iee SaellS; private
cllles; prafess;e"al effiees.
r) Rae!ie arid televisio" sales aRa serviees; researea Bfld elesiga laBS; reslaw'Bflts.
s) Sase repair; shoe steres; shopping eenters; SBHyeRH- stares.
Words struc!c tPif81:1.ga are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 4 00
.
.J
..)
178
~J fish stefOS.
N~GENDA ITEM
SEP f) f ?anl~
b I oF7
a) UpholslefY sael's.
e1H5ide kamels.
~~
------,--;....-"
'r:) Water MlH'lagomeRt Faeilit1es.
It) Walch and I'resisioR iRstrumeflt col'air shops.
y) fJ'f'j elher eemmereial ase or I'fefessioRaI sen~ce whish is eoml'aral3le ill a.ture
wi!h !he feregeiag ases ;md whieh Ifte 3eBffig direeter determmes te se sempatisle
ill llle distrist
2. Pemlitled f.eeessery Uses aRd Strueillres:
a) .'.ssessery uses and struCMes eastemarily assesiatea with the I'riReil'al ases.
e) Caretaker's residense.
e) Sig>ls as l'emHtled at time efl'ermit "I"l'lioatien.
3. Pernlitted Uses ana Strnetures:
SHbjeet te Sile Plrm .'<jlpreval.
a) Car Wash.
e) Child sare eeater.
e) Cemmereial coereatisR eataeoT.
a) Dotaehea resideRce in coBjuaetiaR ,,:ith a Basiness aile (I) per business.
e) Permitted ase witJi less than I,QQQ "'!I'are fcet gress floer area iR tJie priaeij;a1
slmoMe.
l) Vehisle rentals.
g) Hotel, motels, and lime shBl'e fasilities.
c.
Minimum Lot f5oa: TeR tho\lBaad (IQ,QQQ) stjUBl'e feat.
D.
MinimHm Let Width: OHe hilllared (I QQ) fuet.
B.
Miaimam Yard ReolliremeHts:
I. Frem yard p;:eaty fiy. (25) feet.
2. Sia. yard noa., or a minimum of fiye (5) fuet witJi \lBollGtrueted passage from Hoat te
rear yard.
3. Rear yard twellty fi-.<e (25) feet.
F. DistaRse BetweeR SlmeMes: Same as for side yard set-baok.
G.
Maltimum Height ef PriRsi13al StrnsMes: 15 fcet.
Words struck threagh. are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 5 of7
.
.
.
H.
MiRimuHl Floor ,'Ino efSlruotHres:
gfeUflel fleer.
N~GENDA ITEM
tl ; S~F-""-;~,;
'Plj ~:"2 ~+"Ib
ORe theasanel (1,990) sfjliare feet !lee BaileliRg"8H'ii~~'-'
I
!
I
,
1. MiBlim"Hl DeRsi!',.: SiJlteeR (16) uRits !ler aore for lFaRsioot leagffig foeilities, hetel, HlBtels,
aRaliHle share faBilities with a HlnJliHlliffi flBer area Bf 509 S'l"Qre feet ]ler HRit.
J. Off Stfeet ParlaRe Re~uiremeRts: .'\s TO'l"ireel by ilie 3BRmg BreliRllflee iR effeet at ilie lime
BflmilrliRg ]lernlit.
SECTION FIVE: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 4.4 C, MAXIMUM DWELLING
UNITS, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49, SHADOWWOOD POO
Section 4.4 C, entitled "Maximum Dwelling Units" of the Development Plan (also known as
the Planned Unit Development Document) of Ordinance Number 82-49, the ShadowWood PUD, is
hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Maximum Dwelling Units:
A maximum of +J.lQ residential dwelling units may be constructed.
SECTION SIX: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 5.2.A ENTITLED "P.U.D. MASTER
PLAN" OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-49, SHADOWWOOD PUD
Section 5.2.A entitled "P.U.D. Master Plan" of the Development Plan (also known as the
Planned Unit Development Document) of Ordinance Number 82-49, the ShadowWood PUD,
hereby amended to read as follows:
A. The PUD Master Plan ('-"ilsBa, Miller, Bartea, SBIl & Peek, me. Dm'::iag File No. RZ 59, Sheet 1
~ is an illustrative preliminary development plan.
SECTION SEVEN: AMENDMENT TO THE PUD MASTER PLAN, OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 82-49, SHADOWWOOD PUD
The PUD Master Plan has been revised as shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein. This Plan, drawn by Q. Grady Minor &Associates, P.A., modifies
and replaces the original Master Plan only to the extent that the tract sizes described have been
altered. All other boundaries are intended to be as originally adopted.
Words 51fl1el~ hSl:lgf! are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 6 of?
!1
~GENDA ITEM
o.
SECTION EIGHT: EFFECTIVE DATE
. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by tbe Board of County Commissioners
SEP '} S 2008
i"y;. fc,~.,,+qc
. -
of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of
,2008.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
, Deputy Clerk
BY:
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
J
'-~J~~ Marjorie M. Student-Stirling
1'\"'" ~sistant County Attorney
-,
Vlords 3t:roel: tHrS1:igh are deleted; words underlined are added.
Page 7 of7
.
Shadow Wood
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Located in Section 16
Township 50 South, Range 26 East
PREPARED BY:
.
WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC.
1383 Airport Road North
Naples, FL 33942
REVISED BY:
O. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES
3800 Via Del Rev
Bonita Springs. FL 34134
DATE ISSUED
DATE APPROVED BY CAPC
DATE APPROVED BY BCC
ORDINANCE NUMBER:
AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NUMBER:
6-24-82
6-17-82
7-13-82
82-49
ll8
NAGENDA ITEM
o~~~...
1
~
. PI! (04- uf "II::::.
,,",~-~...._.. ....-.
SiF
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1-2
SECTION II
STATEMENT OF INTENT 3
SECTION III
J PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 5 -14
TRACTS A & E - MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TRACT B - SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TRACT C-PRIVATE AIRPARK DISTRICT
TlV.CT D COl\1MERClf.L
SECTION V
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 15 -16
)
\16
AGENDA ITEM
No. _.. ,..,,~_
,~t""D ,'" "n~O.
".,1. ~,i ',: .,:' I. lJ"
/, '-&I' ,"I
". l.tJ~ . ,~)
, - ~~~..:.:;:-=:~--:..-,:.-~ ,.,~
.
I.
2.
3.
. 4.
5.
6.
.
N~GENOA ri Eiv':
----.- no_.. ~1B
,. +- 1b
c.;~"~~.
dt,
u J I
X~_~_.{J ..'
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The purpose of this section is to express the intent of The Rookery, Ltd., 706 5th Avenue South,
Naples, Florida, to develop *168.1 acres ofland located in Section 16, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposal development shall hence forth
be known as ShadowWood.
The development of ShadowWood as a Planned Unit Development will be in compliance with the
planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The
residential development with associated recreational and private aviational facilities will be
consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element and other applicable documents for the following reasons.
The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate
community facilities and services.
The project development is compatible with and complimentary to the surrounding land uses.
The subject property will provide a vegetative buffer between the property and Rattlesnake
Hammock Road, the surrounding vacant lands, and the single family residential units to the
west.
The development shall consist primarily of multi-family residential clusters and shall thereby
provide more common open space.
The development shall utilize natural systems for water management such as the cypress,
willow, lower wetland areas, and natural drainage courses.
The development shall promote the maintenance of the residential neighborhood and be
aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient.
- 1 -
.
J
")
\113
AGENDA ITEM
No,_.__~
7. The number of egress and ingress points shall be limited to minimize the impact upon th
traffic flow along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. SE~' (OOR
8. the development is complimentary to and consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive9..~, .,k3-~(Q .1
Plan Land Use Element. ,- -.'----- -
9. The land may be used more efficiently, and made more desireable resulting in a smaller
network of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance
costs,
10. Through proper planning and good uniform development control, the development shall
protect property values and meet the general public welfare and safety of the citizens of
Collier County.
11. The project will enable and encourage compatibility with the natural amenities of the
environmental as well as preserve and enhance present advantages.
12. The application of the development plan will permit flexibility and feature amenities and
excellence in the form of variations in siting, mixed land uses and varied dwelling types, as
well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of
the land.
13. With proper uniform quality large scale development, the project may best serve the public
interest with alternate mixed land uses.
- 2.
.
.
.
SECTION II
AGEND I'~-'
No.______.~...... I
,,\'t"-.I'~' '\ ~
o ~,,' ' ,
?ij~j.tJ~ vf <10
STATEMENT OF INTENT
It is the property owner's intention to continue the development of a single and multi-family
residential project with recreational, commercial, and aviational facilities, and other support
facilities required of a development surrounding a private air park community. The project was
initiated in the early 1970's with the development of single family residential condominium lots
with common facilities.
As part of the same property, it is the intent of The Rookery, Ltd. to continue to develop a
condominium complex consisting of cluster villages; multi-family residential units; single family
residential lots; and varied dwelling unit types. The units shall be centered around major points
such as the air park, lakes, pine and cypress trees, common open space, and areas of unique
vegetation. There may be recreational benefits consisting of jogging trails, para courses, private
swimming pools, neighborhood parks, tennis courts, and the unique feature of a private airpark.
Residents of this project shall be afforded the opportunity to own private airplanes and a single
family residential or condominium unit with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and
commercial services among a natural scenic environmental setting.
The residential development of low-rise multi-family and single family units shall demonstrate a
quality way oflife for its residents that will be eminently desireable, esthetically pleasing, and
enviromnentally sound.
- 3 -
.
J
)
118
SECTION III
AGENDA ITEM
1\10 "_'~._.n.~,_~.~._
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
;lrmA
~",-=,~~'2?C <{5ccfE,J
3.1. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP:
The subject property is currently under the control of The Rookery, Ltd. 7006 5th Avenue
South, Naples, Florida 33940.
3.2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The subject property is described as follows:
The east Yz ofthe east Yz and;
the north Yz of the northwest'!. of the northeast '!.;
the southeast'!. ofthe northwest ';" of the northeast'!. and;
all being in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS the south fifty (50) feet for road right-of-way and any easement right-of-
way of public record.
LESS WING SOUTH AIR PARK PRIVATE VILLAS UNIT I, a Condominium,
according to the Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Book 476,
pages 304 to 350, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended.
- 4-
.
.
.
\1D
AGENDA ,- 'li[-
No~ . I.t:::..,
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
SF! :'I![" I
Ir'll ":':;D DC 96 f
_-:------- .._.
4.1. PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for development of the property
identified on the Master Development Plan. It is the intent of the project sponsor to
develop multi, family and single family residences in a low profile silhouette with ample
common open space associated with the conveniences of aviational, recreational, and
commercial services.
4.2. PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS:
For the purposes of gross residential land use area, the subject property is *168.1 acres.
The project plan including street layout and land uses is illustrated in Exhibit "B", PUD
Master Plan, \l,'ibefl, Miller, Bartee, Sell & Peek, In.., Drawieg Pile Ne. RZ 59. The
project shall consist of five land use tracts of general area and configuration as shown in
Exhibit "B",
Tracts A & E - Multi-family Residential
Tracts B - Single Family Residential
Tract C - Private Air Park District
Tmet D Cemmereial
Entrance Drive
~ 113.3 Acres
* :h+5.68 Acres
* ~6.l Acres
I IG.3 ,'<ereG
* 3.0 Acres
~~ l68.08Acres
Total Area
Assuming favorable economic and market conditions, it is the project sponsor's intent to
complete development of the property within six years.
- 5-
.
J
17B
AGENDA ITEM
No __.~_,"~~~..._
The total maximum residential units will be ~57 4 units at a maximum density of Ji6
3.4 units per gross acre.
)' If!nq
~~:kl. bf4L_
4.3. TRACTS A & E: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
A. Purpose:
The purpose of this section is to indicate the land regulations for the areas
designated on PUD Master Plan as Tracts A and E, Multi-Family Residential.
B. Permitted Uses and Structures:
I
No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or
land used, in whole or part, for other than the following:
1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
a. Multi-Family Residences.
b. Common open space, recreational facilities and water management
facilities.
c. Nine hole golf course with the typical facilities of a private country
club.
2.
Permitted Accessory Uses and Structure"
a. Customary accessory uses and structures.
b. Signs as permitted as time of permit application.
c. Airplane hangers and tie downs.
d. Private road, pedestrian and bicycle paths, boardwalks and cross-
walks, jogging and nature appreciation trails, or other similar
facilities constructed for the purposes of access to or passage through
the common areas.
e. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage.
- 6 -
.
.
.
\10
c.
AGENDA 1", E~'
No__,_..,~,__ I
SE~ 1
.y~,::r~ "f 910
Maximum Dwelling Units:
A maximum of 558 residential dwelling units.
D.
Minimum Yard Requirements for Principal Structures:
I. Depth from property boundary line (35) feet.
2. Depth from edge of all private paved roads (25) feet.
3. Minimum distance between any two (2) principal structures on the same
parcel shall be fifteen (15) feet.
4. Minimum distance between a development phase, or condominium tract line
and any principal structure shall be seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
E. Minimum Yard Requirements for Accessorv Structures:
As required by the Collier County Zoning Ordinance.
F. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures:
900 Square feet for each dwelling unit.
G.
Maximum Height of Principal Structure:
Three (3) living stories above one story of parking with a maximum height of
forty-five (45) feet.
In order to comply with the minimum flood elevation requirements, the
maximum height of a structure shall be measured from the minimum base flood
elevation required by the Flood Elevation Ordinance.
H. Minimum Off-Street Parking:
Two (2) parking spaces per residential unit with a minimum of 1.5 parking
spaces/unit paved and .5 parking space/unit reserved for paving at a time deemed
to be appropriate by the County.
I. Limitation on Signs:
As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building
permit.
4.4 TRACT B: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
A.
Purpose:
The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan and land
regulations for the areas designated on PUD Master Plan as Tract B, Single
Family Residential.
- 7-
/115
. AGENDA ITEM
No ~.__~__
.
B.
Permitted Uses and Structures:
',,-,.-
; ,~)t.~ )finK
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or l'lIld :'1? 0 f' C; , ,
used, in whole or in part, for other than the fo]]owing:"~.c"C,~,,-c;cc=~. .'u_
1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
a. Single Family Residences.
b. Common open space & water management facilities.
2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
a. Customary accessory uses and structures.
b. Recreational uses and facilities.
c. Airplane hangers or tie downs.
C. Maximum Dwelling Units:
A maximum of H 16 residential dwelling units may be constructed.
D.
Minimum Yard Requirements:
j
I. Front Yard - 25 feet
2. Side Yard - 7.5 feet
3. Rear Yard - 25 feet
4. Accessory structure as required by current zoning ordinance.
E. Minimum Lot Width: 100 feet.
F. Minimum Lot Area: 12,000 square feet
G. Minimum Floor Area of Princioal Structure:
1,200 square feet exclusive of patio, garage, and/or airplane hanger.
)
- 8 -
.
.
.
\10
AGENDA 1'1 EM
No.______
H.
Maximum Height of Principal Structures:
Three (3) stories above the finish grade oflot or from the minimum base ~
elevation required by the flood elevation ordinance.
SEF ')ilH'"
'7 LJ o~9b
I. Off-Street Parking Reauirements:
Two (2) spaces, at least one of which shall be located within the permitted
building area.
J. Landscaping and Buffer:
All buildings, enclosures, or other structures constructed for purposes of
maintenance, shall have appropriate screening and landscaping.
4.5 TRACT "C": PRlVATEAIRPARKDISTRlCT:
A. Purpose:
The purpose of this section is to indicate the development plan and land
regulations for the areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tract "C",
Private Air Park District.
B.
Development Plan:
I. The primary purpose of this Tract will be to provide the necessary aviational
support facilities to accommodate a private airport. These areas shall be
utilized only in accordance with the provisions necessary to maintain and
operate the private air park.
2. Except in areas to be used for water impoundment and principal or accessory
use areas, all natural trees and other vegetation as buffer shall be protected
and preserved so long as such plant life shall not interfere with the control of
airspace within 700 feet from the end of the primary runway surface.
C. Uses Permitted:
No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or in part, for other than the following:
,9-
\1]
a. Airport runway and administration building.
NAGENDA ITEM
0.___._
'E~
J~; ,'I, . '.o'
r o)~, ,,)n(,q
.f[.,,,,J.5:c Fe} h .'
--- '- - -.
-----.-------..:..:;;:...-
.
I. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
b. Airport hangers, T -hangers, and Airplane tie downs.
c. A viational fueling and service shop.
d. A viational maintenance and service shop.
e. Water management facilities.
f. Any other similar aviational support facilities that may be necessary or
compatible with the operations of a private air park.
2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
a. Accessory uses customarily associated with the uses permitted in this
district.
b. Lawn or golf course maintenance shop and equipment storage.
c. Signs as permitted at time of permit application.
J
D.
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Setback from edge of primary runway surface - 100 feet.
2. Other structures must conform with setbacks of the abutting properties land
use regulations; however, they may not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the
primary runway surface.
E. Control of Airspace:
The control of the airspace within 700 feet from the ends of the primary runway
surface shall be adhered to by the project sponsor. The control shall be of such a
nature as to prevent any airport hazards from being grown, erected, or otherwise
placed within a glide path of 20: 1 from the ends of the primary runway surface.
- 10 -
.
.
.
H.
TRf.CT "D" COMMERCL'.L
,
....
Pum8se:
The pllFp n.
. ese e t IS !lestiea is te sot fo a e -.
FegHlatIeas f"r tile areas aesigHalea ea ~b tl e,ac.elopmoftt plall aIla lalla
CElffimereial ill ~:Iaster PlaR as Traet "D"
. '
B. Uses Permittee:
he;
N~~~~~~:".~~~-I
. 0EF ....
. -') .'
.lrL /b tJ 9...
No aaildiag ar structure, ar part tIlereef sh
use a, iR whale er part fer ather tRail th' Ii ~ll a~ ereGtea, alterea er UGea, er lllBd
, e e e~.~/1Hg:
1. Permittee PRaeipal Uses aIla StruetlH'cs:
a) f.?tiEjlle sheps; art sma;es; art sa I' ~h ..," .
wltheut Fel'aiFS' ",'iatio . 1'1') el's, a.latlea fueling faeilities
a fe" a H1RlftteHllBee Ma ~e.. .j.. sa . I
all Ie OV.l'IS, aaHliai"tratieH allilaiag. ' el', a1FjlllBe RllBgers
a) Bakery Sael'S; aarBer ami ae!\ll~' saa 5'
aIla selTiees; aluel'rist slIeps' a 1"'P eI aath "al'ply steTes; bieyole sales
maehine serviees. ' 00 ( 1ft ers; be01~ steres; BusiBess
eJ Caareecs ami etller plaecs ef--'eTaei . I .
eOfFlfRersial reereati0R Hses i~a00~' e ethlI~.g. stsres; eeeh:willmmges;
aIla ellBey ~teres. r, eaHlm.relal seaeels; eoafestieRary
a) D.lieates~.Hs; arng steres' a 'I .
dr-llflery seel's. ' I) e eallffig slIel's; ElI)' gGeaS sleres; aIla
f) FieRst shel's.
- 11 -
'lB
..
g) G El&: SIIl"P:Y steres
gO:fB1et sheJ"S.
h) Hlll'Eh-;lll'e steres; health filed steres.
~ AGENDA IlEM
No. ___-.>..__"~.~_
.. - , .Is- i shef's'
elltside display la sHle !lfl6 roOm) or ,g , QI-r;., '.. '.'. [If,,:
.. ~J.t.... C,' ".'
71 <>H(O
,.f!i",",=~",,-c:: ....-.c-'== .
I
[
i) lee eFeam stares.
j) Jewelry stores.
I) Latiaaries self serviee ealy; lea!ller gee6s; legitimate IllOatres; liEJllef
sIeres; leeksmiths.
a' 1 effiees llRa eliBiss; millinery s8e(3s;
m) ]l,iarkcts feea anEller meat; me lea
ffil::lSElHJ:HS; lfll:lsie stares.
B) }Ie~;;s 5tE)f(~5.
t)
e) Offise general; effiee slIpply "tere.
he S' pet sllflpI:,' sheps; (3hetegrllflhis
1') Paiat llRd wallpaper steres; pet s (3~. . plleli"hing ElIl6 mimeegFliflh
. meat stsFes. pettery stares; pFiB lBg,
e,!Il'? he(3s' pri..ate ellles; prefcssieaM effiees.
se:r~'lee s~ , .
.' . researeh and desiga 1005;
r) P.:aElie ana tele",'isieR sals3 ana seFJ. lees,
restB:UFaIlts.
. eeaters' SOIl'leaH- stefes.
s) Shee repair; shee stel'Os; She(3(31ag ,
eSFaHlie tile; 188&688 sImps; toy
TaJler sheps; t""ieermists; tile sales
shsps; trepieili fish steres.
J
II) U(3holstery she(3s.
",') 'lariaty sasps; .,'ehiels reatal
elinies BEl 81.itsia6 }csRsels.
i=Jle GBl)" Y>eteRHarian amaas anEl
autome 1 , .
w) Watef MEIIlageIBeat Faeilities.
J() ',\Tatsa &Rei flreeisiea mstrumeat repair SB813S.
. ~ ssisaal serviss ';:mea is eem:pB:f~Ie iB
y) f.ay eilier eelHfllerelal."se er pm ;'''h' h tile z8aillg airester aetermmes
BatHre .;lifh the f1:)regem~ l:lS~S an ., Ie
Ie he 6sffipatihle is the alStrlet.
- 12 -
.
.
.
\1~
2. PeFHliFtee A
. .eeeDSeI'y Uses llfla Struetures: N~~!:'."JDA r'l:::M--~
a) Aee ' -
.. esse!) Hses ana ~-
~ struemes eHGtemaril " I .u!::"
. ) I15See!atea .",.itll tlle~Beipal 1 ~
a) Caretal:.:er's resiaenee.
e) Signs as ~efffiittea at t'
IfflS ofFle "t
r ffill BJJf1lieatioR
3. Pefffiittea Uses ll11a SIn .
Sll~eet te Sile Plall A Helures:
. .JI~r"'/al.
a) Car 'Naoh
e .
) Ckila eare eeBler
e) G .
emmereial rsereat'
a) Detaeeea ."siae I.SR ".\Haeer.
e) Permi!! a Bee IB eeBJllRetiBn milk II
e use mifu 1 n a l:1SiReSS
p" .. ess tkalll QQQ ene (I) Re. II .
Ii rlBelflal struemre ' slillafe feet ~ess .cI t". HSlRess.
~ '\ r k" b' ..eer Bfea .L
. e !ele rentals ill me
g) IIelel, metels . a .
, EIR tIme share .&:a '1'1'
:l1 61 Hes.
C.
Minimllm Let A
. <fee: TeR tRallsana (19999'
~A' . ' , sfjlIllfe feet
..In!mllm Let "'. a h .
.. I l!: ORe ImRarea (WO) feet.
MiRimllm Y ~ n '
af.... ~..eaHlremeBts:
D.
E.
F.
I. Prell! ylll'll 1>"
.. caty fi','e (25) feet.
2. SiEle )'B:fS ae
Fr ff Be, er a miflimaffi f H
em eat ts rear yara e ','e (5) feet witk llRell lR
. s uetea JlllSsage
3. Rear yara f1"
.. enty fi','e (25) feet.
Distanee BeB;:eeB C'......
o LO l::Ietares: g
} 1 . ame as fer siae yard ,elbaek
. a)[!fllllm Heiffit ef P' . .
BRell,al StRlet-lli'es: 15 feet.
Minimllm Fleer A
l'lllilaing en tk . >rea ef Slruetllces:
e gFellRa fleer.
G.
II.
ORe lilellsand (I 099)
, sEJ1lftI'e f-eet Jler
I.
P.iwdlHtifB DSHsit .. S'
k I I .. ",teeB \I ~l .
€I e , metals aHa too UHlis per ReTe feT tfaf .
feet l'er uait ' e share faeilities ,,/ilk am' aSleat ledging faeililies
. --~'
er area ef 599
sEJllare
- 13-
4/1
.
J
,
)
\,&
J.
f AGENDA" EM I
No.__...__
. . . rdin nee iR .ffeot
. . ats" S fe'Illlrea B) tHe zeRlRg e SEP' (.".. 'im". ".'
~:~ ;~~;"~~::r . a ..,. ,
at tHe ti:e of building I'eanit. Ii I?g _,t -:L..,j- C\.~.
~---- -.. -.-
- 14 -
.
.
.
,
SECTION V
ct.:;;,
ur "
l-liL2.b
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
5.1. PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project.
5.2. P.U.D, MASTER PLAN:
A. The PUD Master Plan ('NilseR, Miller, BarteR, ~ell & Peek, IDe. DflIwing File
Ne. RZ 59, Sheet 1 ef2), is an illustrative preliminary development plan.
B. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood
as flexible so that, the final design may satisfy the project and comply with all
applicable requirements.
C. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to
insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities.
D. Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to staff approval.
E.
Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of
structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment of buffer
areas.
F. To protect the integrity of the Planned Unit Development, residential
neighborhood, the only access road shall be the private road as shown on the
Master Plan with an exception for temporary construction roads.
G. Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval, parts
thereof may be green areas in which as much natural foliage as practical shall be
preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green areas, shall be of general area
and configuration as shown on the Master Plan.
- 15 -
1
'~50
-~
.
J
)
~
\l3
H.
N~GENDA ITEM
-----...~.-
Wetland subzones "A-I, A-2, A-3, B-1, C-l, E-l andE-2" (Wilson, Mil1er,.",_~-
Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. Drawing File No. RZ-59, Sheet 2 of2), are illustrative ::itr" JOil"
subzones and will be conserved as much as p~cticable as storm water . -J:g,~~lj rrf- '"t' {"
management/open space areas. These areas WIll be flagged for protectIOn, pnor- ~ c- ,', -~,",,"c--o_
to development. . --
5.4 WATER MANAGEMENT:
A. Detailed water management construction plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the County Engineer prior to commencement of any construction.
B. Appropriate easements to be granted to Collier County for maintenance of
perimeter swale system.
5.5. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL:
Such arrangement and agreements as necessary shall be made with an approved solid
waste collection service to all areas of the project.
5.6. RECREA TION FACILITIES:
A minimum of three swimming pools and three tennis courts shall be constructed by the
project sponsor.
Additional recreational facilities may be constructed by the future residents of this
project.
5.7.
TRAFFIC,
A. The project sponsor will provide to the appropriate governmental agency, an
additional right-of-way of 17.5 feet along the south property boundary line for
future road widening of Rattlesnake Hammock Road.
B. The project sponsor agrees to construct a right and left turn storage lane on
Rattlesnake Hammock Road for traffic entering ShadowWood and to pay his
proportionate share of the costs of a traffic signal at the project entrance when
required by the appropriate governmental agency.
C. A sidewalk shall be constructed on one side of the main entrance road into the
project.
- 16-
.
.
.
'.
5.8.
",""'"
UTILITIES: ~ltt.
. l~\j.~<6,j v+- q b
A. A central water supply system shall be made available to all areas of thd P'~-;l. .. cC , . - .....
The water supply source for the project shall be the County system.
B. All areas of the project shall be served by a central wastewater collection system
and by an existing off-site waste water treatment plant The existing plant shall
be expanded as may be needed to meet the anticipated demands.
Plans and D.E.R. permit applications for the sewage treatment plant shall be
submitted to the Utility Division.
C. The project sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable County laws and
ordinances governing utility provisions and facilities.
D. Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all
residential areas. All such utility lines shall be installed underground.
- 17 -
\'
.
.tJ
)
, ~: ~
I ~~ l
",,,~-""I<""'--'''''-
~
~~~"-"-"-
~ "' f ~ ~ z
z"
"Z
0<
" I w
:;) lflc5
0. W <
" "'~
w < >-
b:~cnO::
O-w<(
O;:E~~
<:l:~~ ~
....I~I LI}
~OUW
~f-08~0
"'''''
O~~~~
~Ul~!;tal
t-~~~~
" ~O~
OZz L.l..
"'00
L.l..~w~l-!
D~:C ::.0
Wl=l-o:::~
i;;;:<v}~Vl
~...JZ Zt:J
~2Q..zZ
a::W~I~
lfl~WgU
<l:uO:: 0>-
~ ...J~!:i
t:5~t-O
~lL2~5
Xa:::Z ~g
ww~~
VltnZVl:J:
~~~~~
W
~
o
z
---. lJlIO~ X:!OI'll"ff'H 3>1\1'NS31ll'~ ----_
c:J
~
~
ld~~.
, ~qi~
~
;;,
. "
" z
:; ,
- ~
~
.
(?
.
~ <
~
~~
~~
~!i
.~
~!
.
~
~
.
I ~
o
.
<
~
G
.
.
o
<
~
~ ~
~ ;
~ ei ~
. 0 .
I I ~
~ i ~
, , -
:;
~
~
llB
'-1 -:--': ~ 'TEM
i ~- --
'I' Ii ~.
. ~ t' ;~'~"11":-'..
-0 _ till'
-~~G:'?-C't5.b
.~_.-
~
'"
~
'"
'l
[j
"
m
~
ffi
~
~I !
. I
:ill" .
I-< ~~ .
~ II I
g. ,
~l' I'
~ 'j'I'
...1,
~ I~I ~ ~
<!ll' 'i
~l!, I
~Iii !
"', i
0" I
; ~ ; j
,
I'
.
.
I
!
;
, ~,'[.
j :,~
O.,.O)>}JOV'I'\\fHj).l\lNSJlll.'lId___._
~i;
" 0
:-. :il
" ~
~j .-/----------...Q
o
9
~Il
::!OI" ..
i1"" t<""
~~~~~~~
~~oq~'"
,
"
<
"
i
u I
g \ "
i'l '2'~ nl
I" 1\
II ii~~:J~
l >>
)r'''--=-
I '
I
\
) i I
,
I I
~-~I
;/,/" li
II
I"
\~, \
''''~...)
/../"~\
,_/ '\
(-Iri ,If~,
I I I ~ / .."
I I I //;:/ '"
! I i ~\ II
) \\ \ /;:/ \ "
('~\ \~" jI
A::,"\ \~-~/V
\,\ ;:/,,,,/
\ ~----A /
\ '~y
'--- r~
( '\..
i ~
<
<
!,
3
Q
~
I
!= ~
g, ;;.
" "
o
, ,
.
u
g
AGENDA ",EM
No. ._, .. ~'~_M", U~'_'_<~._
SEr;";' .. . ;
.". '8 ~ u{ Cj y~
.l,,\!,=,,\~, ,~
~ .. .. ..
" ,
.:t- z z z
.
-
"
"
~
.
<
~
~
,
u
~
~
*
.
"
'"
,
l' ~
g ::;:l
~I
t
-
,
2
l '51
\ II
\
-----./ I
~
ZO
~~
o :r w
co ~ ~
0... w~
o <Y~
~w<()-
a.~~~
O2(:) ~
~~~ ~
.....rLI (/l
~OUw
Ol--O:r .
iiQ2:SI-U
o g:3 ~ O<j
~c.n:Z~1D
1--:"l:-2(f)
2$~6t---
OZZ4-~
0::00 u::
l.J...>=: Wf-
ZW Z
OlLl:1: ::-10
Wi_I-- u::!-
~~ w
L54.vio~
o::-,ZZO
U::JO:JZ
~Jl..Li7i '<C
0: ~5 23I
(f.<,::W:JLl
4.UU:: C>-
~ ......r Ct:1Y
Z--<l: I <(
i:=:<rZ>-O
;:D--.JO I Z
ID..>=='ti6
e;-:,u::.3n:CO
w~~
If)0;Z VlI
~~~~~
w
~
o
z
"
~
'" W
~ ~
"
'" 'i'
'l ~
S
"
"'!
'-.
t2; ~<
e-.,!;
:::;:H:;
u=:~
~^,'. .8
<I) ~ ~ ~
." j., ': ~
"da~ ::
~~H ~ ~
~~. ; E
:E'l
>- ;~.l
~Ut
""
6g
,
,
I j! '~
;
PUDA-2007 -AR-11283
Project: 19990174
Date: 6/11/07
TRIP GENERATION REPORT
FOR
SHADOWWOOD PUD AMENDMENT
Prepared for:
Wing South, Inc.
Prepared by:
Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
CIVIL ENGINEERS. LAND SURVEYORS. PLANNERS
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
(239) 947-1144
...l/~--
REV: 2
Our T'A&~7, -c-_
. No___~_U_~=:\1
, ':)'t'-;::,,, '''''' )
J f;, -" ,~: ifl!:'.'
--fbc;c~? o-E1h "
- -~--..
DECEMBER 2006
Revised June 6, 2007
.........<:;.De:in Smith, P.E.
FL 44147
G:\PROJ. PLANNING DOCS\WSPl - SHADOW WOOD PUD\TlS\WSPITIS.DOC
WSPl
AGENlJA ; I ;::;!'j;
No_~_,__?
Table of Contents
l'E~;
~, ~"
Pij~~.~ "L:: 'IJ-f'
'~~-_. -- ---~--
Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................i
List of Figures and Tables.....................................................................................................................i
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................1
SCOPE...................................................................................................................................................1
TRIP GENERATION...........................................................................................................................1
DISCUSSION.......................................................................................................................................1
List of Figures and Tables
TABLE 1................................................................................................................................................2
TABLE 2................................................................................................................................................2
TABLE 3................................................................................................................................................3
TABLE 4................................................................................................................................................3
TABLE 5................................................................................................................................................4
TABLE 6................................................................. ...............................................................................4
T ABLE 7................................................................................................................................................5
TABLE 8................................................................................................................................................5
TABLE 9................................................................................................................................................6
TABLE 10.............................................................................................................................................. 6
TABLE 11..............................................................................................................................................7
TABLE 12..............................................................................................................................................7
FIGURE 1.............................................................................................................................................8
FIGURE 2 .............................................................................................................................................9
FIGURE 3 ...........................................................................................................................................10
FIGURE 4 ...........................................................................................................................................11
l1(j
SHADOWWOOD PUD AMENDMENT
AGENDA l'iEM '\
No. ~__~~.___..--'_
I
I
INTRODUCTION
SEF
01 ~f--q~
t~~.__.- '.' .~-C'~,~.
The proposed Shadowwood PUD Amendment is for a 1.98 acre swap from Tract C, Private Air Park, to
Tract B, Single Family Residential. The proposed change would result in an increase in permitted
single family residences from 11 to 16. The existing 558 multi-family units will remain unchanged.
The project is located on the north side of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road, approximately 1 mile west of
Collier Boulevard in Section 16, Township 50 Sout:.~, Rallge 26 East, Collier COlh'1ty, Florida.
SCOPE
The following analyses are included in this report:
1. Trip Generation Calculations (at buildout) presented for Peak Season Daily Traffic
(PSDT) including the respective peak hour volumes.
2. Trip Distribution to surrounding roadway network.
3. Projected 2012 Traffic and Level of Service.
TRIP GENERATION
The 7th Edition Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is used for
trip generation calculations provided in this report. Please refer to Tables 1-12.
The trip generation for the previously approved use is estimated to be 2,904 daily trips, 221 trip ends
during the AM peak hour and 261 trip ends during the PM peak hour. The trip generation for the
project including the proposed use is estimated to be 2,961 daily trips, 225 trip ends during the AM
peak hour and 267 trip ends during the PM peak hour. This results in a net increase in trip
generation of 57 daily trips, 4 trip ends during the AM peak hour and 6 trip ends during the PM
peak hour for the proposed project.
DISCUSSION
Figures I through 4 summarize the projects impact on the adjacent roadway network. The projected
background traffic volumes for Rattlesnake-Hammock Road were based on a growth rate of 4%. This
growth rate was based on the growth on Rattlesnake-Hammock Road east of County Barn Road since
the segment adjacent to the project entrance was not counted due to construction. The project traffic is
far less than 0.1 % of the service volume on the roadway. The project impacts are not significant on the
surrounding roadway network.
G,IPROJ - PLANNING DOCSIWSPI - SHADOW WOOD PUDITlSIWSPlTIS,DOC
WSPI
\
Table 1
TOTAL DAILY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
2
AGENDA ,; Eivf'-- :
No _..__...~__ j
"t"-' .'
oJ ,'~r;,
. f1 C;:r tC~ b
.",ij~D
-~.-:'--' '--'~
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISON USE
MULTI-
FAMILY
SINGLE
FAMILY
230
558 DU
Ln(T) = .85 Ln(X) + 2.55
Ln(T) = .92 Ln(X) + 2.71
2,768
210
llDU
136
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-
FAMILY
SINGLE
F AMIL Y
230
558 DU
Ln(T) = .85 Ln(X) + 2.55
2,768
210
16DU
Ln(T) = .92 Ln(X) + 2.71
193
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
Table 2
ENTERJEXIT BREAKDOWN OF DAILY TRIPS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MUL TI-F AMIL Y
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
l:lB
Table 3
TOTAL DAILY EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS
NAGENOA II EM
o. __..~.,___~____
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
"EP' .
" ., c'y"
v .j :_';: (iW~
I P . 'is "'1 oJ'. I .
L !I~-,.-..=-;o'c;c.
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE F AMIL Y
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED.USES
Table 4
TOTAL DAILY EXTERNAL NON-PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDMSION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
\
Table 5
TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERA no
AGE'. " -~ .;.,---
l\-.Jh;; =I~i' I
No. ___.____~,..____,__
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISON USE
""'I.rr-r;"
~tl'
i PlJ~qD'Ut'1p .
MULTI-
FAMILY
SINGLE
F AMIL Y
230
558 DU
Ln(T) =.8 Ln(X) + .26
204
210
llDU
T = .7(X) + 9.43
17
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-
FAMILY
SINGLE
F AMIL Y
230
558 DU
Ln(T) =.8 Ln(X) + .26
204
210
16DU
T = .7(X) + 9.43
21
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
Table 6
ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING AM PEAK HOUR
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
:~
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE F AMlL Y
I~Z~
N~GENOA IIEM
--~'-
Table 7
TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS
~'.l ;
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI,FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
Table 8
TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON-PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDMSION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
Table 9 O~~;. " _.1, ~~:. I
TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATIO LPij=o_~" ~ ~Ji,
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISON USE
MULTI-
F AMIL Y
SINGLE
F AMIL Y
230
558 DU
Ln(T) = .82 Ln(X) + .32
Ln(T) = .9 Ln(X) + .53
246
210
11 DU
15
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-
FAMILY
SINGLE
FAMILY
230
558 DU
Ln(T) = .82 Ln(X) + .32
246
210
l6DU
Ln(T) = .9 Ln(X) + .53
21
Table 10
ENTERlEXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING PM PEAK HOUR
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
AG -EM
No i;
-,.-......~--
Table 11 SEP1 ..)i!f,P
TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS 'j~'i__c LJ:? bE-q <0
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
NET NEW TRIPS FOR PROPOSED USES
Table 12
TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON-PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION USE
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL INCLUDING PROPOSED USES
MULTI-FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
FIGURE 1
50::'.
2
(2) ..
. (<0.1::'.)
50::'.
1
(2)
(<0.1::'.)
50::'. 50::'.
2 2
J"L
w
>
Ct:
o
>-
<{
:;:
>-
~
U1
L~o::'.
(2)
\1J)
N~~E~~.IT~M.. I
I
I SEt, If". {. !
, '1'1 vTq \J
'.J(il - .:::"c.""'~' "coc __:.:.0.
~
...
50::'.
1
(2)
(<0.1::'.)
50:;
2
· (2)
(<0.1:;)
..
50r;~
(2)
RATTlESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD
LEGEND
XX% PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECT TRAFFIC
XX AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX) PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
(XX%) PROJECT TRIPS AS % OF SERVICE VOLUME
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
FIGURE 3
N~~~_~--I;
I SEP .ir"
L,e~~ D f--0b
-~~ --~.=-:-_-
~
w
>
0::
o
>-
<t
:;:
>-
:0<:
U)
..
633
(263)
[896]
B
633
(263)
[896]
B
.
RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD
LEGEND
XX PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION TRAFFIC
(XX) TRIP BANK
[XX] TOTAL VOLUME
LOS LEVEL OF SERVICE
NOTE: COMPOUND GROWTH
RA TE OF 4% USED FOR
PROJECTION BASED ON
2006 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
2012 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4
w
>
n::
<=>
>-
<(
~
>-
~
(f)
~
[1b
AGENDA '-'''M,
N I C; .
o:"~___"--::._ !
;1 SE, .:_'II~I'- f
, Pij~q~{)~Jb
"-----------'--- -- - ~;._.~~- - -
633
(263)
. ((2))
[898]
B
633
(263)
((2))
[898]
B
.
RATTLESNAKE -HAMMOCK ROAD
LEGEND
XX PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION TRAFFIC
(XX) TRIP BANK
((XX)) PROJECT TRAFFIC
[XX] TOTAL VOLUME
LOS LEVEL OF SER~CE
2012 TRAFFIC WITH
NOTE: COMPOUND GROWTH
RATE OF 4% USED FOR
PROJECTION BASED ON
2006 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
PROJECT INCLUDED