Backup Documents 03/24/2009 Item #16C 4
16C4
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The completed routing slip and original
documents are to he forwarded to the Board Office only .!!.f:!IT the Board has taken action on the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines # 1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, andlor information needed. If the document is already complete with the
excention of the Chairman's sirmature, draw a line throw!h rautin J lines #1 through #4, complete the checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s) Office Initials Date
(List in routint:r order)
1. C c::., \\ E' p,"" 6if'P" i~ emf[
c-
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson. Executive Manager Board ofCollnty Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pending BCe approval. Normally the primal)' contact is the person who created/prepared the executive
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the evenl one of the addressees above, induding Sue Filson, need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents needing the Bce Chairman's signature arc to he delivered to the Bee oflice only after the Bee has acted to approve the
item)
Name of Primary Staff David Jaye, Recycling Specialist Phone Number 239-252-7620
Contact
Agenda Date Item was March 24, 2009 Agenda Item Number 16C4
Aonroved bv the BCC
Type of Document Grant Application: Landfill Leachate six Number of Original 1
Attached inch HDPE pipe Documents Attached
1.
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is
a ro riate.
Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be revic\ved and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages lrOln ordinances,
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties exccpt the BCC
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and ossibl' State Officials.)
All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's
Office and all other arties exce t the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date ofBCC approval of the
document or the final ne 'otiated contract date whichever is a licable.
"Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's
si nature and initials are re uired.
In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC ollice within 24 hours of BCC approval.
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines'
The document was approved by the Bee on March 24,2009 and all changes made
during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County
Attorne 's Office has reviewed the chan es, if a licable.
Yes
(Initial)
N/A(Not
A licable)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
l?J
'()~
7;>-5.
):j
'Z>:(
1: Forms/ County Forms/ BCe Fonns/ Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Origina19.03.04, Revised 1.26.05, Revised 2.24.05
MEMORANDUM
Date:
April 6, 2009
To:
David Jaye, Recycling Specialist
Solid Waste
From:
Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re:
Grant Application: Landfill Leachate Six Inch HDPE Pipe
Enclosed you will find the original application referenced above (Agenda
Item #16C4) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
March 24, 2009.
If you have any questions, please call me at 252-8411.
Thank you.
Enclosures (I)
16C4
Donna Fiala
District 1
Frank Halas
District 2
Tom Henning
District 3
Fred W. Coyle
District 4
Jim Coletta
District 5
16C4
0','
. 4:~?
...,,'
rl30an! 0/ '#() Ilin Yf(i fUI~1j Yf?o4nmt;;'JWJU!41-6
3301 East Tamlami Trail- Naples, Florida 34112 - 4977
(239) 252-8097' Fax (239) 252-3602
March 24, 2009
Ms. Kathleen Marshall
Florida Department of Community AtTairs
Division of Emergency Management
Mitigation Section
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
Dear Ms. Marshall
On behalf of Collier County, I am pleased to submit the enclosed grant application (one
original and three copies) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of
Emergency Management for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
If the "Collier County Landtill Leachate six inch HDPE Pipe" project is selected for
funding, Collier County is committed to flllfilling all commitments made in the grant
application, including provision of the local match.
We look forward to working with YOll on this very important project for Collier County.
SinCe~?J
Ifl?~'
Donna Fiala
Chairman
I
cit-~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
16Cl,.
STATE OF FLORIDA
HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
Collier County, Florida
Collier County Landfill Leachate
Six Inch HDPE Pipe Project
1. Transmittal Letter
2. Grant Application
3. Wind Retrofit Worksheet
4_ Attachments
Collier County Government Complex Map
Scope of Work/Cost Estimate/Product Specifications
Collier County Property Appraiser's Map
Flood Insurance Rate Map
Collier County Map
USGS Topo Map
Photos
Alternative Project - Estimated Budget/Costs
Distance from Coast/Miles Inland Map
Construction Date (from Floor Plan)
Building Size/Building Value/Contents Value
Description of Services Provided
Building Budget and Number of People
Request for pre-award costs
STA TE OF FLORIDA -- JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C4
FEMA-_-DR-FL
Support Documents
o Conforms wi State 409 Plan
o In Declared Area
o Statewide
THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY
o Standard HMGP
o Standard FMA
o 5% Initiative Application
o Initial Submission or
o Application Complete
o Re- Submission
Eligible Applicant
o State or Local Government
o Private Non-Profit (Tax 10 Received)
o Recognized Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization
Project Type(s)
o Wind
o Flood
o Other:
Community NFIP Status: (Check all that apply)
o Participating Community 10#:
o In Good Standing 0 Non-Participating 0 CRS
State Application 10:
State Reviewer:
Reviewer Phone#:
Reviewer Fax#:
Reviewer E-Mail:
Date Application Received:
Signature:
Date:
This application is for all Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region IV) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
and F]ood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) proposa]s_ Please complete ALL sections and provide the documents requested. If you
require technical assistance with this application, please contact your State Emergency Management Division at (850) 922-5269.
A. To Fill Out This Application: Complete all sections, which correspond with the type of proposed project
General Application Sections: pp. ]-5: All Applicants must complete these sections
Environmental Review: pp. 6-9: All Applicants must complete these sections
Maintenance Agreement: p. 10: Any Applications involving public property, public ownership, or management of
property
pp. ] 1-13: Acquisition Projects only -- one worksheet per structure
pp.]4-] 8: Elevation Projects only -- one worksheet per structure
pp. 19-2]: Drainage Projects only
pp. 22-24: Wind retrofit projects only (HMGP only) -- one worksheet per structure
pp. 25-27: Wind retrofit/shelter projects only (HMGP only) -- one worksheet per structure
FEMA Form 90-49 (Request for Public Assistance): All Applicants must complete, if
applicable.
HMGP/FMA Application Completeness Checklist: All applicants are recommended to
complete this checklist
Acquisition Worksheet:
Elevation Worksheet:
Drainage Worksheet:
Wind Retrofit Worksheet:
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
B. Applicant Information
FEMA-Blank-DR-FL
DISASTER NAME: Hurricane Storm Fay
Hurricane
Ex.. FEMA-1609-DR-FL:
· Title / Brief Descriptive Project Summary: Collier Countv Landfill Leachate six inch HOPE pipe.
Applicant (Organization): Collier Countv
~plicant Type:
~ State or Local Government D Recognized Native American Tribe 0 Private Non-Profit
County: Collier
State Legislative District: State House76 State Senate 37 Congressional District(s): t4 House: _ Senate:
Federal Tax 1.0. Number: 59-6000558
FIPS Code*: #021-99021-00 (*ifyour FIPS code is not known, please fill out FEMA Form 90-49 (Attachment A) so that
the Department may obtain a FIPS code for you)
Nationa] Flood Insurance Program (NF]P) Community Identification Number (this number can be obtained ITom the FIRM
map for your area): 120067
NFIP Community Rating System Class Number (FMA ONLY): N/A
I
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C4
STA TE OF FLORIDA. JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
9. NFIP Laot Community AalSllllCe VillI Date (PMA ONLY): .lII4
10. AllIdIproof ofcurrent l'lood Insunuu:c PoIfey (FMA oDl,y). l'lood Irwuranco Polley Number: .lII4
II. PaJat olCoat.a
OMs. x[]Mr. OMu. Pint Nun.: IWllI LUI N.me: .1m
Title: RteYcll.. S'DHldd
Street AcIdrea: 3301 T.ml~mt Trail E. Bundln. R.. 3d Fl6Gr
ClIy: &Il!u State: EL Zip Code: .H1U
Telephoo.:239-2n-1620 PIX: 239-11<1-9222
Bmen Acid.... (if.VIlI.b1e)-d..IdI..-..llltrwav....
12. AppUndoD Pnpared by. []M.. X[]Mr. [JMn. Firet N.me: RI!lII Lal: aim
TIn.: RIeW:UH SINd.11It Telephm&: 23,..251..7620 Pax: 23J..77.4-9222
13. A.thorlzcd AppII...t Apol (pn>%/outhDl1tM/M out6orfOl 'qull'fl(l .
~. 0Mr. OMn. PIrotNome: JlQIIIl LutN_: flaIa
Title: Ch.lrmu Te m.: 239-252-819'1Fu: 239-29-31502
Street A_:
City: &ilia, I; . I _ ~
SlllD Date:~
14. All propooed projeallh d be Included in the eounty'. Local MltIptlOlI _I)' (LMS). .
AIlIdII. . letter ofeodorsement Ibr tho proJec:t Itom tho county" Local M1tlptlon -IY CoordInator. 181 v.. 0 No
IS. Hu thi. projo:ct been .ubmitted UDder. prevlou. diouter ...n17 Iho p1_ provide tho disuter Dumber IDd projo:ct
nurnberif...n.bl.. .lII4
Sec:lIon L ProJecl DaerlpllOD
A. H_nts 10 b. Milia_led I Level orProter:llon
I. S.lect tho type ofhazorcb tho J!.opcoed proJo:ct will rnItipte:
o l'lood 181 WIIIcI U Stonn ._ 181 Other (1111): RaiD. 011I... dlull...
2. Identity lh.11PI ofpropooed projeet:
o BlevItlon end RlroIlIIIna of residential or JIClfHOIidenlialetru<:ture
o Ac:qulsltlOll and roJocatlOll 0 Aequillllon end demolition
o Wind retn>llt 0 MfDor dr.fD.,. projec:t th.t redo.., localW>ci llood1..
181 Other (p1_ explain) LandIlII J.eoc:halo six Iodl HIlPB aIao
3. LIst the lolal number ofpel'lOll' the1 will be proIOdcd hy tho propo.sed P'<!led:
4. Pill in the level o(proleCIlon end tho......hude of..... 111I propooed projec:t will rnlllpte.
(.... a3.1Ir_ proteeted aaa/nIl tbe W!-year (1%) Ilood)
llrueture(.) protec:tcd aplnIldte _ -year Flood (10, 2),'" 100. '" '00_>
. otructure(.) pro_ ...fnll mil. per hour (rnph) wlndo
11lru<tun:, tho current 4 Inch PVC pipe can be overwh.lmed by a ~or rain .venl _or other diwter.
,. ~/n..m/ ,rojftD 0'''' (e... Dr.I....lmpro.emenlJ, Bl'OIlOII Control or other IpeCIaI proJed typeI. (Other
special prcjeet typeIlncJude drolnlae end other en&lneered~. Th... prqfec10 .re unlike aequl.lllon,
elevation or wind _li1oIlhutlen.)) Attach 10 th;, _ ALL enalneerinJ <l1e.lanon. and dulllD plan. used to
cIctennh,. tho above 1...1 of protection.
.
AoIIIItnl 00\IlIy Mamay
2
.<'
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C~
B. Project Description, Scope of Work, and Protection Provided (Must be Completed in Detail)
Describe, in detail, the existing problem, the proposed project, and the scope of work. Explain how the proposed project
will solve the problem(s) and provide the level(s) of protection described in Part A. Also, if available, attach a vendor's
estimate andlor a contractor's bid for the scope of work. Please ensure Ihal each proposed projecl is miligalion and nol
maintenance.
Description of the existing problems-
The Collier County, Florida Solid Waste Management Department maintains one landfill and four recycling centers.
Collier County generated 590,270 tons of municipal solid waste in 2008. Of this amount 241,816 tons of residential &
commercial solid waste was buried in the Collier County Landfill. Water exposed to garbage is called landfill leachate.
The Landfill is an essential facility to store Mixed Solid Waste for Collier County residents and businesses. The landfill's
current 4 inch PYC pipe would be overwhelmed by rain during a severe storm or other catastrophic event. Leachate is
water exposed to waste in a landfill. Collier County's collection system has a six inch pipe to which the landfill connects
with a four inch PYC pipe.
We propose to install a six inch landfill HDPE pipe to sllpplement the existing 4 inch landfill PYC pipe. Landfillleachate
potentially causes a severe risk to health and safety by exposing drinking water wells in the area and the water shed.
Overwhelming of the Landfill leachate system or destruction of pipe capacity may cause a scenario where the leachate has
to be stored in temporary tanks and trucked off site. A worst case scenario is direct landfill leachate into a bermed uplands
area until the leachate pipe is restored. There would be a very high cost to remove leachate from a bermed land area as
leachate quickly infiltrates ground. State and Local penalties could be high if the leachate reaches drainage areas.
Describe the type(s) of protection that the proposed project will provide-
The project will involve construction of 3230 feet of six inch HDPE (SDR II) pipe to supplement the existing four inch
PYC pipe which leads from the Collier County Landfill to the County waste water treatment facility collection system.
This pipe will provide additional capacity to process rain which is often generated by storms and hurricanes or other
emergencies.
Scope of Work (describe in detail, what you are planning to do)-
The project will involve construction of3230 feet of six inch HDPE (SDR II) pipe to supplement the existing four inch
PYC pipe which leads from the Collier County Landfill to the County waste water treatment facility collection system.
The Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction cost is included as Attachment A.
Describe any other on-going or proposed projects in the area that may impact, positively or negatively the proposed
HMGP or FMA project-
The proposed Environmental Compliance and Landfill Scale House is an essential facility for the processing ofleachate
during normal and disaster related mixed solid waste, debris and horticultural waste for Collier County residents and
businesses.
Section II. Project Location (Fully describe the location ofthe proposed project.)
A. Site
I. Describe the physical location of this project, including street numbers (or neighborhoods) and zip codes; and if
available, please provide precise longitude and latitude coordinates for the site utilizing a hand-held global
positioning system (GPS) llnit or the equivalent: Collier County Environmental Compliance and Scale House,
3730 White Lake Blvd, Naples, FI, 34117_ The Latitllde ~ 26 09'26.992"N and Longitude~ 81 39'28.772"W.
2. Title Holder: Collier Countv
3
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM & 16 C 4
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
3. Is the project site seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL)? DYES [8JNO
4. Provide the number of each structure type (listed below) in the project area that will be affected by the project.
That is, all structures in project area.
D Residential property: _ D Businesses/commercial property: _
D Public buildings: _ D Schools/hospitals/houses of worship:
[8J Other: Landfill Leachate six inch HDPE oioe
B. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing Project Site
D Attach two (2) copies of the FIRM map, a copy of the panel information from the FIRM, and, if available, the
Floodway Map. FIRM maps are requiredfor tltis application (ifpublislredfor your area). Also, all attaclted
maps must Itave tlte project site and structures clearly marked on the map. FIRMs are typically available from
your local floodplain administrator who may be located in a planning, zoning, or engineering office. Maps can
also be ordered from the Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616. For more information about FIRMs, contact
your local agencies or visit the FIRM site on the FEMA Web-page at
http://www.fema.l!ov/homeIMSC/hardcopv.htm
Using the FIRM, determine the flood zone(s) of the project site (Check all zones in the project area).
(see FIRM legend for flood zone explanations) (A Zone must be identified)
0 VE or V 1-30 0 AE or A 1-30
0 AO or AH 0 A (no base flood elevation given)
[8J B or X (shaded) 0 C or X (unshaded)
0 Floodway
0 Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CBRA) Zone (Federal regulations strictly limit Federal funding for projects in
this Zone; please coordinate with your state agency before submitting an application for a CBRA Zone
project).
0 If the FIRM Map for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map
(FHBM) for your area, with the project site and structures clearly marked on the map.
C. City or County Map with Project Site and Photographs
~ Attach a copy of a city or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) with the project site and
structures marked on the map.
~ Attach a USGS I :24,000 Tapa map with project site clearly marked on the map_
~ For acquisition or elevation projects, include copy of Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.)
showing each property to be acquired. The map should include the Tax ID numbers for each parcel, if possible.
~ Attach photographs (at a minimum 2 photographs) for each project site per application. The photographs should be
representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc. and drainage areas, which affect tl
project site or will be affected by the project. For each structure, please include the following angles: front, back and I
sides.
Section III.
Budget/Costs
In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the project. As this information is used for the Benefit-Cost Analysis,
reasonable cost estimates are essential. Since project administrative costs are calculated on a sliding scale, tlo not include them in
the budget. Also, do not include contingency costs in the budget. Avoid the use of lump sum costs.
A. Materials
llem
Connections to Existing pipe
Dimension inches
Cost
$2,814
4
6" Fittings 6" 10 $550 $5,500
6" Plug valve 6" 2 $2,575 $5,150
6" x 4" Tee 6" x 4" 2 $1,500 $3,000
4" plug valve 4" 2 $2,600 $5,200
6" Clean outs 6" 6 $1,400 $8,400
Six inch HDPE (SDR 11) pipe Six inches x 3230 linear ft 3230 $46.44 $150,001
Restoration Lump Sum 1 $72,935 $72,935
Flow Meter 1 1 $7,000 $7,000
Estimate of Probable $260,00
Construction Cost
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C4
B. Labor (Inclllde eqllipment costs -- please indicate all "soft" or in-kind matches)
D
'r
}{,
R t
C t
escnmlOn ours ae os
Vendor Design and Permitting costs $40,000
Collier County Project and Grant Management
Project Manager (in-kind) 155 $78,000/2000 - $6,045
$39 hour
$68,000/2000-
Enviroumental Specialist (in-kiud) 50 $34 hour $1,700
254* plus an
Recycling Specialist (in-kind) iucremeutal $72,000/2000= $9,153
hour $36 hour
Waste Reduction and Recycling Manager (in-kiud) 50 $97,800/2000- $2,423
$48.46
Manager, Solid Waste Operations (iu-kind) 15 $90,580/2000- $679
$45.29
In-kind salary $20,000
In-kiud total up to $60,000
C. Fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project.
Descrivtion of Task
Hours
Rate
Cost
Total Estimated Project Cost $320.000
D. Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar)
The maximum FEMA share/or HMGP/FMAproject.. is 75%. The other 25% can be made up of State and Local funds as well as
in-kind services. Moreover, the FMA program requires that the maximum in-kind match be no more than 12.5% of the total project
costs. HMGP/FMA funds may be packaged with other Federal funds, but other Federal funds (except for Federal funds which lose
5
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
their Federa! identity at the State level - such as CDBG, ARS, HOME) may not be used for the State or Loca! match.
16C4
Estimated FEMA Share
$240.000
75% of Tota! (maximum of75%)
Non-Federal Share
Estimated Local Share
$40,000 6% ofTotal (Cash)
$20.000 12% ofTotal (In-kind')
$_ _% of Total (Project Global Match")
Other Agency Share
$_ _% of Total
(Identify Other Non-Federat Agency and availability date: ~)
Total Funding sources from above
$320.000
100% Total (should equal 100%)
"'Identify proposed eligible activities directly related to project to be considered for In-kind services. (Note on Page 4 Section B)
**Separate project application must be submitted for each project (Global) Match project.
E. Project Milestones/Schedule of Work
List the major milestones in this project by providing an estimated time-line for the critical activities not to exceed a period of 3 years
for perfonnance. (e.g. Designing, Engineering, Permitting, etc.)
Milestone
Number of Davs to Como/ete
rEx., Demolition of 6 structures and removal of debris 14 daysl
Survey 30 days
Design of 6 inch HDPE leachate_pipe l20days
Pennitting of 6 inch HDPE leachate pipe 90 days
P~e ordered, manufactured and shipped to site 90 days
Install Pipe 1 90 days
Local Insl"'ctions and punch list items review 60 days
Clean up 45 days
Weather De lays 120 days
State Final Insoection 120 days
Section IV.
Environmental Review and Historic Preservation Compliance
(NOTE: TlIis application cannot be processed iftlli.. section is not completed.)
Because the HMGP/FMA are federally funded programs, all projects are required to undergo an environmental and historic
preservation review as part of the grant application process. Moreover, all projects must comply with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and associated Federal, State, Tribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO WORK can be done prior to the
NEPA review process. If work is done on your proposed project before the NEPA review is completed, it will NOT be eligible
for Federal funding.
6
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C,,"
I. The following information is reqllired for the Environmental and Historic Preservation review:
All projects must have adequate documentaNon to determine if/he proposed project complies with NEPA and associated statutes.
The State Environmental Staffprovide comprehensive NEPA technical assistance for Applicants, with their consent, to complete the
NEPA review. The type and quantity of NEPA documents required to make this determination varies depending upon the project's
size, location, and complexity. However, at a minimum, please provide the applicable documentation from this section to facilitate
the NEP A compliance process.
~ Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/costs (Section I (p_ 2) and Section III (p. 5) ofthis application).
~ Project area maps (Section II, part B & C of this application (pp. 3-4)).
~ Project area/structure photographs (Section 11, part C of this application (p. 4)).
~ Preliminary project plans.
~ Project alternatives description and impacts (Section IV of the application (pp. 6-8)).
~ Please complete the applicable project worksheets. Dates of construction are required for all structures.
~ Provide any applicable information or documentation referenced on the Information and Documentation Requirements by
Project Type (page 9 of this application).
2. Alternative Actions
The NEPA process requires that at least two alternative actions be considered that address the same problem/issue as the
proposed project. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the hazards faced in the project area. One
alternative is the "No Action Alternative",
1. No Action Alternative
Discuss the impacts on the project area ifno action is taken.
Staff and consultants have helped estimate costs to replace Collier County Landfill Leachate pipe:
Alternative 1: Pump landfill Leachate on surface upland area of the landfill. The area would be
surrounded by a dirt berm to contain the leachate while the landfill leachate pipe is being replaced. There
will be additional costs to remove soil contaminated by leachate. There may be state and federal fines.
Possible fines will be large if the leachate reaches natural water flow features. Emergency response
vendors have yet to respond to our request to provide a price range for remediating this scenario.
Alternative 2: Replacement costs: Real Property Losses:
$360,000 replacement cost of existing leachate pipe includes a $60,000 20% emergency construction
surcharge.
$ 50,000 for 156,000 gallons temporary leachate storage tanks for seven days while the new pipe is
being installed.
$156,000 for Contract/rental costs: (trucking leachate to a water treatment plant is $1 per gallon times
156,000 gallons over 7 days)
Total Cost for Future Damages & Associated Expenses: _$566,000 minimum
7
STA TE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
Section IV. Environmental Review; Alternative Actions, continued
(NOTE: This application CANNOT be processed if this section is not completed.)
16C4
2. Other Feasible Alternative
Discuss a feasible alternative to the proposed project. This could be an entirely different mitigation method or a significant
modification to the design of the current proposed project. Complete aU of parts a-e (below) and include engineering details
(if applicable).
a. Project Description for the Alternative
Describe, in detail, the alternative project. Also, explain how the alternative project will solve the problem(s) and/or
provide protection from the hazard(s).
The alternative project is to reconstruct the landfill leachate pipe at an emergency replacement cost of $360,000.
In addition the County will need to pay $206,000 for temporary handling of the leachate: $ 50,000 for two
] 56,000 gallon temporary leachate storage tanks for seven days. The additional contract/rental costs: $] 56,000
trucking leachate to a water treatment plant is $1 per gallon times 156,000 gallons over 7 days while the pipe is
being fixed. There will be additional County staff and consultant time to supervise this emergency work.
Total Cost for Future Damages & Associated Expenses: _$566,000 minimum
DAMAGE & LOSS COSTS, divided by PROJECT COST = QUICK BCA RATIO
DAMAGES ($566,000)
BCA I. 77
PROJECT $ ($320,000)
b. Project Location of the Alternative (describe briefly)
[gI Attach a map or diagram showing the alternative site in relation to the proposed project site
[gI Photographs (2 copies) of alternative site
Section IV.
c. Scope of Work for Alternative Project
Environmental Review;
Alternative Actions, continued
d. Impacts of Alternative Project
Below, discuss the impact of this alternative on the project area. Include comments on these issues as appropriate:
Environmental Justice, Endangered Species, Wetlands, Hydrology (Upstream and Downstream surface water
Impacts), Floodplain/Floodway, Historic Preservation and Hazardous Materials.
e. Estimated Budget/Costs for Alternative Project
In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the alternative project (round figures to the nearest dollar). A
lump sum budget is acceptable_
8
STA TE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C~
,
l. Malerials
Item Dimension Quantitv CasLPer Unit Cost
Replace the landfill $360,000
leachate pipe
2. Labor (Include equipment costs -- please indicate all "soft" or in-kind matches)
D H R C
escrintion ours ate ost
Temporary
Portable 156,000 $25,000 in set up,
gallon storage permits and rental $50,000
tanks set up and for seven days
rental for seven
davs.
Trucking leachate
to a water
treatment plant at $156,000
$1 per gallon
times 156,000
! 1!3l1ons.
Total $206,000
3. Fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project.
Descrintion of Task Hours Rate Cost
State and Federal Fines
would depend on solid
waste and liquid waste
dama2es
Total Estimated Project Cost $_$566,000_
9
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C4
HMGPIFMA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Information and Documentation Requirements by Project Type
Retrofits to Existing Facilities/Structures
Elevations
Acquisitions with Demolition
v' Dates of Construction
v' Concurrence from State Historic Preservation Officer if structure is 50 years or
older or if work to be done is olltside the existing footprint.
Drainage Improvements
v' Engineering plans/drawings
v' Permit or Exemption letter to address any modifications to water bodies and
wetlands
o Department of Environmental Protection
o Water Management District
o U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers
v' Letter from State Historic Preservation Office addressing archeological impacts.
v' ConCllrrence from U.S_ Fish and Wildlife addressing any impacts to wildlife,
particlllarly endangered and threatened species and their habitats.
v' If the project is in coastal area, attach a letter from the National Marine Fisheries
Service addressing impacts to marine resources.
v' Concllrrence from Natural Resource Conservation Service if project is located
olltside city limits and may impact prime or llniqlle farmland.
Note: This is a general guideline for most projects. However, there will be exceptions.
Consult with environmental staff on project types not listed.
10
STATE OF FLORIDA - JOINT HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM &
FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION
16C4
SeclIlJlV.
Malntenln... AarcemODI
AU _"ClIft" who.. PNpMM pr.~ 'ft'HJha ,.. = "' """'!fI!:!!/Ion ., exUtln,
p"611& pr",.11J' 0' wki. ~ pro}"" _I" 1ft ,lie pilblfc .III"mll" ....
_.,_.11I 0' prope1f.1,: ,6u<<IIr.., -., r.d1lIf!h. J'Jut jlm ,Ip "'" fo/IoWi'lI
arTtlOlllmt pri.r ID 11II""""'" tlulir ."pnClflfDII.'" p.lf1lfA. .
(NOTB: f1uu. """clUll! .."". pro}IcJ. DIllY IIIJ10ltw "'" ,.troflttl. IIlDllDdo". fit'
DJII" modU/caJloii '" I1I'Iwde JWPDt1 11I"_ "'" ...""JIt/p ../11 ,.._ prl_ iJfter
proJed colilplmDII DtT/VOf /r_1D itmfplm t1r& /tJrIIf.)
Tho of~. Stale ofPJorido, """"'r "area that
!fit t~':' aid u. resu11 ofilia Iltacbocl ~ "I'I!lication, It will accept
reapOllllbUlty.IlIta lIWI) _lr~. for 1M """"".t1lI.......~ of!llll' roar
1lIOPmtY. alnlCl...... or ~ tc<IuinllI or coru_d u. mull of ouch Peolet'iI aid.
Roiit1nii malnlonlllCll ....U _. bul not be Ilmited to, ouch rapolllihiliti.. u
~ vlcantlanel c1_ of dolxii, 1IIb"llO, aneI>mmin; koeoinJi ._ channel"
cui_, ~ IlOnIl c!ninIclNr of i&tmclions end debda; IIll1I kiepIq d_on ponds
he of aeoriI, ....., ancI1IIOCIIIy plWlh.
The _ orlbb._, i'IO make clear the SUb~ee'. mainllmaru:c
r)lIpOJII1l>ililiel foUowi!rll>Rliccl1lWOld end 10 show 1hi Submntoe'. Icccp!once of
lbii'mpollIlbIIitlea, It if... not renIac:e. super<ede, me.dd fo any oIher moinlclwlcc
~6i1iti.. imPosed by Pederollaw<< rcgulatloft aneI which an: in mn:c en !be date
.(project .word.
SIp>ed by DOllIIl F1=re dulY lutbori",d .....nlIlive
(prhId.., ""'~Iia"_.r.t)
ChainMtL
(Odol
'''- M ,.
this l:L (J'IJI) of!..:.Xl.1lH/Jlontk), ~o--).
-- ft."" ..Le.
.PIn.. "010, , o.bD.. .ltIft_ IIII1St b. by 1111 In"'''''"", ..Itll 1"6'" '16ft""
D"tlwrity,., tll.rup<<tiv.IoCfll tt_I'IUIIBlt., <fI/UIty (e.tt., tl.. ChlllrpnlDll,
B.DrtllI/Ctnulty Co_tnlollDn Dr tIr. C.fmly MDlUllt!1', .'oJ
~ MlOfcmllltgolaufflclttlcy
~~ I '1b~{)AY
Q' rein.,
_I c;.,""'Y AllomeJ
ATTEST: " ..,. '.'"
D~~~:~~
~ -' ,
,~::> .' , , ' , ' '.:
Atu~ at ~. O\I.~ '
"\jt\4~rt pn ',"" .';'
'/ " . . ','
-'
"
, ~~ [ <; [: . ~
II
Drainage and Other Special Project Type Worksheet 16 C 4-
(Other special project types include drainage and other engineered projects. These projects are unlike acquisitions, etevations or wind
retrofits (shutters)).
Municipality/County: Collier County. FL
Project Title: Landfill Leachate six inch HDPE pipe
Please fill Ollt this worksheet completely. Note: The required infonnation is necessary for the completion of the application process
and the technical and engineering review.
1- Attach a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and indicate the project area. Make sure the Community Identification Number is
displayed on the front of the map.
2_ Attach a City or County Scale Map and identity the entire project area. Provide detailed address and decimal coordinates
(latitude, longitude) of project location. Collier County Environmental Compliance and Scale House, 390 I White Lake Blvd,
Naples, Fl, 34117. The Latitude ~ 26 09'26.992"N and Longitude~ 81 39'28.772"W.
3. Attach a topographical map of the study area.
4. Is a Flood Insurance Study of the Area Available? Yes 0
No (gJ
What is the Community Name? _
What is the Community Number?
What is the FIS publication date? _
5. How many structures within the study area were flooded? NA
(a) Attach a copy of the County Property Appraiser Report for each structure, including address.
Note: A current Uniform Residential Appraisal Report, current Realtor Summary Appraisal, RS Means Cost
Estimate or Marshall & Swift cost estimate are also acceptable supporting documentation.
Indicate the first floor elevation of each structure with Elevation Certificate as supporting documentation. (or Survey) _
(b) What was the depth of flooding inside each structure (inches and/or feet) per stann event? _
(c) How long (hours and/or days) was each structure flooded? _
(d) Please provide an annual maintenance cost for the drainage improvement solution. _
Note: Although FEMA does notJund the maintenance oj a project; this cost is neededJor the benefit cost analysis
and the performance of the drainage improvement system.
6. How many structures within the study area experienced yard flooding only? NA
(a) Attach a copy of the County Property Appraiser Report for each structure including address.
Note: A current Uniform Residential Appraisal Report, current Realtor Summary Appraisal, RS Means Cost
Estimate or Marshall & Swift cost estimate are also acceptable supporting documentation.
7. Frequency of Event: Provide specific day, month and year per flooding event for each structure_ NA
1)-
2)_
3)_
4)_
5)_
6)_
1
16C4
Drainage and Other Special Project Type Worksheet continued
8. Provide the dollar amount for each insured flooded structure (Proof of loss includes National Insurance Claims, etc. _.). NA
1)_
2)_
3)_
4)_
5)_
6)_
9. LOSS OF FUNCTION NA
List the roads within the study area that were closed due to flooding, and how many days closed. Provide the number of one-way
traffic trips per road and indicate the detour or delay time per one-way trip (in hours.)
1)_
3)_
2)_
4)_
Note: Datafrom the Department a/Transportation, Public Works Division, or any other credited source is acceptable.
10. Was any Non Profit/Public Facility affected by flooding? Yes D No D NA
ffyes: Indicate the name of the Non Profit/Public Facility that could not provide services due to flooding_
II. What is the Annual Operating Budget Amount for each facility or facilities mentioned above? NA
Note: Do not include maintenance cost within the Annual Operating Budget.
$
$
$
Microsoft Office Outlook. Ink
12. Provide photographs of the damaged properties and areas. See Attachment 5
13. Have preliminary plans for the drainage improvement project been completed? If yes, a copy should be submitted.
Yes r8J
No D See Attachment 6
14. Have final approved plans and/or final hydrologylhydraulic studies from a professional engineer or consultant for the
proposed drainage improvement project been completed?
YesD NoD NA
If yes, provide final plans and/or hydrologylhydralllic study. (It can include Flood Modeling).
Name of the consulting finn: _
Project engineer name: ~
Telephone number: _
E-mail address:
15. Provide an estimated project budget with cost break down by line item. A Summary Report from the consultant or
Professional Engineer describing the problem and the proposed solution with the necessary supporting Engineering
Calculations for the project/solution. The report should also certity the level of protection and the magnitude of event the
completed scope of work will mitigate. (Example: 40 homes will be protected against a 100 Year Flood EvenL) Finally, the
report should provide an estimate of damages that is anticipated for events beyond the mitigation efforts. (Example: The 40
homes can anticipate 15% structural damages for 250 Year Event and 30% structural damages for a 500 Year Flood Event).
Provide a letter from the consultant or Professional Engineer indicating the design period the new drainage improvement
2
"'I"......'. ........ .......u........... HJ". ............ ..........U......... V
16. If you do not have preliminary nor final plans and studies, do you want to phase the project?
YesD
No ~
16C4
Drainage and Other Special Project Type Worksheet continued
17. ADDITIONAL STORM DAMAGES CAUSED BY FLOODING: NA
List the amount of damages (in dollars) caused by flooding per road. $
(i.e. washout materials, culvert damages, pipe damages)
List the cost incurred due to emergency measures. $_
List the dollar figures for debris removal within the effected? $
How many days was the community without power? _
Did the community lose potable water service? Yes D
No D [fyes, provide community population with Census
Statistics data as supporting documentation.
How many days the community was without potable water services?
D
I day
D 2 days
D 3 days
D _ days
How many days the community was without wastewater treatment services? If yes, provide community population with
Census Statistics data as supporting
documentation.
D
I day
D 2 days
D 3 days
D _ days
18. Please attach any documentation for other indirect damages caused by flooding and the dates of flooding within the project
area. (Le. Lost wages, police department overtime wages, public works clean up crews overtime wages, cost incurred on
clearance of vehicles and other disaster-related materials, damages to electric panels in pumping facilities, levees breaches and
damaged equipments). See attachment 6
19. Provide a list of Avoidable Damages and the flood frequency on which these damages will be avoided. The flood frequency
for avoidable damages must be justified by engineering drainage studies. See Attachment 7
20. Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) may be needed for this project. Any changes to the FIRM need to be reflected on the flood
maps, which is accomplished through the LOMR process. The construction of this project may lower the 100-year flood
elevation and thus, possibly lower the flood insurance rates for structures in the project area. If the LOMR process is
applicable to the proposed project, please contact the Department for assistance at (850) 922-5269, Department of Community
Affairs, Division of Emergency Management.
3
. i;
I 8 ~ j
U ~;
. · Jl '.j
I ~ ~'
I J ~:
j I ~!
....~. j gft
~! C) ~
<<
;F:.. ~
... ~~i'
j
N
,
i:Q
.....
=
..
8
..c:
"
"
.....
.....
-<
I
l
- i:
16C4
ij
.ll
.=I"
! ~ j
j.. J
~, ~
..
w
""
~
1_4>
(iJ
1.\
.1 l!l
I ·
II
16C4
<"> =
;"'lOl
",",0
=::Il
::Ilz
to:l~
"'"''''
",",,,
pC]
ZCJ
Oc
;u
::;;01
p"
0,
I_
p-
-<
01
."Z
0>-
;U"
0'
0101
U1
<=,
>-p
ZZ
o
."
C'
,
16C4
EVALUATION OF LANDFILL LEACHATE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Prepared for
Collier County, Florida
November 2008
850 Trafalgar Court, Suite 300
Maitland, Florida, 32751
_Evaluati~n of Landfill Leac~!e Management_<2Ptio! 6 C 4
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDiCES............. .
LIST OF FIGURES................
LIST OF TABLES.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... I
II
.........................11
1. OBJECTiVES........................
..........................1-1
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS......... .......................... .............. ............... ................................................... ..........2-1
Existing Naples Landfill....... ..................... ................... ........................2-1
Existing Leachate Transmission System............. .................. ..................... .......................................2-1
Existing Leachate Force Main Materials and Age ............................ .................. ................2-4
Historic Leachate Flow Volumes ................ .............................. ....................... ........................ ..................2-4
Existing IUP Discharge Requirements ...... .................... ........................... .................... ....................2-5
Existing Sewer Ordinance Excess Strength Charges .................................... .................... ................ ................2-5
Historic Excess Strength Charges for Landfill Leachate ..................... ................ ................................................2-6
Historic Leachate Composition. .................................... ................... .............................................2-7
Existing South County Water Reclamation Facility.......... .............. .............2-8
3. FUTURE CONDITIONS ................ ............... ........................ ............... ................3-1
Future Naples Landfill Configuration ................................................... ........................ .................... ..................3-1
Future Leachate Flows.............. ................................................ ............... ............... ...............3-1
Future Leachate Characteristics......................... ............... ........ ............... ................. .... ...................... ..... ...3-3
4. HYDRAULIC ANALySiS.................................... ...................... ..................... .................. ....................................4-1
Methodology for Development of Hydraulic Models ................................................... ..............................4-1
Hydraulic Modeling Results.......... .............................................. ....... ................... ...... ...... ........... ..................... ..4-2
Conclusions from Hydraulic Modeling....................................................... ................... .............. .................. ...4-5
5. IMPACT OF LEACHATE FLOWS TO DOWNSTREAM PUMP STATIONS AND TO THE SOUTH COUNTY
WATER RECLAMATION FACiLITy........................................ ...................... ................ ......................5-1
Impact to Downstream Wastewater Pump Stations ..............................................................................................5-1
Impact to South County Water Reclamation Facility .............................................................................................5-2
6. EVALUATION OF LEACHATE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES.......................................................................6_1
Alternative 1 - Upsize Leachate Force Main Pipe Size ........................................................................................6-1
Alternative 2 - Upsize Leachate Force Main Pipe Size and Install On-Site Leachate Storage Tank....................6-3
Alternative 3 - Upsize Leachate Force Main Pipe Size and Install On-Site Leachate Storage Tank with
Pretreatment and Odor Control............. ..................... ............................6-5
7. RECOMMENDATIONS.....
............................7-1
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. NAPLES LANDFILL - HISTORICAL LEACHATE COMPOSITION..
APPENDIX B. LEACHATE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES COST ESTIMATES
....................... .....A-1
............... ....................... B-1
--------.------------ --.--------.--.-------.-- --...- --.---.
P:I.G",~'r.::o:Jier COII,,'y'o1~J'jt,jj l.od.j'at0 Milll;;1,:rl;(?'lt Opl,ons"}ini'lI r\,~port'JI!'ilr 1<'2portI1C'1iCQb q d;c
l6C~
Table of Contents
Evaluation of Landfil~~~chate Management Options
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. Naples Landfill and Leachate Force Main.............. ............................. ..................................2-2
Figure 2-2. Existing Collier County Sanitary Sewer Collection and Transmission System from Naples Landfill to
South County Water Reclamation Facility ..........................................................................................2-3
Figure 4-1. System and Pump Operating Characteristics-Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station-Existing
7.5 HP Pumps ......... ............... ........................................... .................... ......................... ......4-2
Figure 4-2.. System and Pump Operating Characteristics-Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station-Planned
Upgrade to 10 HP Pumps ................................................... .................................. .................... .....4-3
Figure 4-3. System and Pump Operating Characteristics-Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station-Planned
Upgrade to 10 HP Pumps with Increase of 4-inch Pipe to 6-lnch Pipe. ........................ ...................4-4
Figure 4-4. System and Pump Operating Characteristics-Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station-Pianned
Upgrade to 15 HP Pumps with Increase of 4-lnch Pipe to 6-lnch Pipe ..............................................4-5
Figure 6.1. Alternative 1 - Upsize 4" Portion of Existing Leachate Force Main to 6" Diameter Pipe Size.............6-2
Figure 6-2. Alternative 2 - Leachate Storage Tank...... .............. ............... ........................................................6-4
Figure 6-3. Alternative 3 - Leachate Storage Tank with Pretreatment and Odor Control............... ....................6-7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Historic Monthly Leachate Flow Volume for Naples Landfill (Gallons).. ............................2-5
Table 2-2. Leachate Limits and Monitoring Requirements from iUP 002-08-07.................. ...........................2-5
Table 2-3. Historic Excess Strength Charges for Landfill Leachate. .................................... ................. ............2-6
Table 2-4 Landfill Leachate Quality 1992 through 2003...... ................... ................. ..................................2-7
Table 2-5. Historic Concentration of TKN and COD in Leachate from Naples Landfill.......... ...........................2-7
Table 2-6. Recent Wastewater Influent Flows to South County Water Reclamation Facility................................2-8
Table 3-1. Future Leachate Flow Projections for Naples Landfill...... .............. .......................................3-1
Table 3-2. Historic Peak Day Leachate Generated and Peaking Factor.... ............................................. ...........3-2
Table 4-1. Estimated Range of Operation for Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station - Existing 7.5 HP
Pumps............ ..................... ......................................... .............. ......... ..... ....... ...... .4-2
Table 4-2. Estimated Range of Operation for Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station - Planned Upgrade
to 10 HP Pumps.............. .................................... ............................ .....................................4-3
Table 4-3. Estimated Range of Operation for Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station Planned Upgrade to
10 HP Pumps with Increase of 4-lnch Pipe to 6-lnch Pipe.. ......................................................4-4
Table 4-4. Estimated Range of Operation for Naples Landfill Master Leachate Pump Station - Planned Upgrade
to 15 HP Pumps with Increase of 4-lnch Pipe to 6-lnch Pipe ....... ............................. .......................4-5
Table 5-1. Recorded Flow from Wastewater Master Lift Station 312.00, July 2008 ...5-1
Table 5-2. Leachate Percentage of Wastewater Master Pump Station 312.00 Flows.........................................5-2
Table 6-1. Estimated Future Excess Strength Surcharges for Leachate ................................ .............6-3
---_.._----~_..._----_.-..~_._---
II
~""Gi;~',S(J'lu CUUII'y'1:#i'J3 Le<Ir.lld'e I},'''~-]gellll'nl Op1i()!1s"Fin,i! F:8POIt"Fv, 1~'~pGr; 110.170%11 r!,)c
16C4
EVALUATION OF LANDFILL LEACHA TE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
1. OBJECTIVES
The Collier County Public Utilities Engineering Department (PUED) contracted with Brown and Caldwell to
perform an evaluation of leachate force main hydraulics and leachate management options for the Naples
Landfill. This report describes this evaluation and includes related conclusions and recommendations.
The County currently sends all leachate collected from the Naples landfill to the South County Water
Reclamation Facility (SCWRF). Tbe current lndustrialllser Pretreatment Discharge Permit (lUP) 0002-08-
07, issued by the Collier County Public Utilities Department to the Naples Landfill, includes limits on flow,
nitrogen (TKN) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Due to the limits placed on quantity and quality of
leachate discharged to the SC\"'V'RF, the rUED is concerned that future landfill expansion activity could cause
consistent violations of the current permit. Therefore, the objective of this evaluation is to provide Collier
County with planning level information on leachate management options that have the potential to reduce or
eliminate future economic surcharges and violations of the current permit.
The specific scope of this project includes the following tasks:
(1) Data collection and review.
(2) Hydraulic evaluation of the leachate collection system, including:
a. DefIne existing infrastructure;
b. Evaluate hydraulic capacity of the leachate system; and
c. Identify leachate force main improvements, if required.
(3) Evaluate up to three leachate management options, including:
a. On-site leachate storage;
b. On-site leachate pre-treatment~ and
c. On-site leachate storage and leachate pretreatment.
(4) Prepare planning level engineer's opinion of probable construction cost for each force main and
leachate management option evaluated.
. - -~'---------_._-_._---_._..._~-_._~---_......,,~-
1.1
P',Gf,n',C.o'l;er C(l'ln'y' 1'j~~\~J LM;d~ale ~1,irl-l~pn)(,fil OplI0n~"fin"l RI,po,t',Fir,,\;' f;~'pcrt 1 Gli'ri.~E.IU(i'-;
J6C4
EVALUATION OF LANDFILL LEACHATE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The following paragraphs describe the existing Naples Landfill, the existing leachate collection and
transmission system, existing leachate flows and composition and the current requirements of the Industrial
User Pretreatment Discharge Permit (IUP) 0002-08-07.
Existing Naples Landfill
The Naples Landfill receives Class I and Construction and Demolition \Vaste. Cells 3, 4 and 6 are currently
closed. Cell A 1 has reached permitted elevation and has intermediate cover. Cell 1\2 is the active disposal
cell and it is expected to reach pennitted elevation in 2010. Future Cells will be constructed north of the site
- east of Cell 6 after the completion of the reclamation activities occurring in Cells 1 and 2 and expected to be
completed in 20tO.
Existing Leachate Transmission System
Pigure 2-1 shows a diagram of the existing Naples Landfill, including the location of the Master Leachate
Pump Station and leachate force main. Figure 2-2 shows a schematic of the existing Collier County sanitary
sewer collection and transmission system, from the Naples Landfill to the South County \Vater Reclamation
Facility.
Components of the existing leachate collection and transmission system for the Naples Landfill were
determined based on as-built drawings and interviews \\1.th operations personnel. The existing leachate
collection and transmission system consists of the following:
(1) The leachate collected within each solid waste cell is conveyed by gravity to two Secondary
Leachate Pump Stations located on the landfill site.
(2) The Secondary Leachate Pump Stations transfer all leachate that is collected via 4-inch and 8-
inch force mains to the wetwell of the Master Leachate Pump Station,
(3) The Master Leachate Pump Station consists of two submersible pumps located within a 6-foot
diameter wetwell. An adjacent valve vault houses pump discharge piping, ball check valves, plug
valves and a flow meter. Currently, two 7.5 HP submersible pumps (Flygt Model CP3l27.t8l
1fT - impeller diameter 245 mm - 1745 rpm) are utilized. The current plan is to replace these
pumps in the near future with two 10 HP submersible pumps (Flygt Model CP3l27.l81 HT-
impeller diameter 228 mm - 1735 rpm).
(4) The Master Leachate Pump Station transfers leachate through a 4-inch force main that traverses
from north to south along the western landfill property line until it reaches \X1hite Lake
Boulevard. The 4-inch leachate force main then continues wesn.vard along \"{'hite Lake
Boulevard until it turns southward, where the force main diameter increases to 6-inch and then
crosses under \X'hite Lake Boulevard. At tIus point, the 6-inch force main makes an aerial
crossing over a canal. The 6-inch force main then crosses under 1-75.
--------.--.-.-.--------.--.-..-....--
2-1
P:\G')n\ColI'erCourltY'.B~553 LpiJl;iHe M"i'J9' l1ent Opi:');)sI,Flnilll~'Tor!"J-in;ll R"pC)r1 11Q.1irKJ&H,j(;c
~
16C4
-'
-'
G:
o
zz
j;q:
'"
(f)
wW
-'U
cLlr
<i0
ZLc
~
.<i
,I
N~
WW
",-'
=>0
2z
Lc<i
.....:l
"'...:l
...,
J>:l
Z~
~=
O...:l
llll<
=<.>
16C,,-
Potential Environmental Impact due to Leachate Intrusion to the Ground Water
Background
The Onalaska Municipal Landfill site consists of a seven-acre landfill, situated on an 11-acre parcel of
property adjacent to the Black River in the Town of Onalaska. The surrounding area is rural and
consists primarily of agricultural lands, although several homes are located close by. The Onalaska
Municipal Landfill Superfund Site is located in Onalaska, Wisconsin and was originally used as a
sand and gravel quarry from the early to mid-1960s. In the mid-1960s, the Town of Onalaska began
using the site as a landfill for both municipal and chemical wastes. Landfill operations stopped in
September 1980, and the landfill was capped in June 1982. Subsequent investigations found
elevated levels of VOCs and metals in a groundwater plume that extended at least 800 feet from the
southwestern edge of the landfill and discharged to nearby wetlands and the adjacent Black River.
The aquifer beneath the landfill served as the primary source of drinking water for the residents in the
area. In addition, soils above the groundwater table and adjacent to the southwestern edge of the
landfill were contaminated with petroleum solvents.
Leachate Composition
This situation in the Onalaska Municipal Landfill located in Wisconsin is a great example of the
environmental impact and what it will take to clean up the ground water in case the leachate gets in to
the ground water plume due to a rupture in a non lined area in Collier County. The most common
components of Collier County Landfill's leachate are, ammonia (NH3), sulfate (S04), chloride (CI),
pH, manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn), organic carbon, CAC03, arsenic (AS), Barium(BA), Benzene
Beryllium(BE), Cyanide, and several other metals such as Copper (CU). These components are
considered contaminants if they exceed the target line levels under CFR 62-777.
In the particular case of Collier County Landfill these components are always changing depending on
the age of the cells and the type of waste buried in these cells. As leachate ages, a transformation
from an aerobic to anaerobic environment occurs within the landfill and cells due to the reduction of
oxygen particles. Concentration of BOD, COD and ammonia in older cells will be higher that a new
one. Variations in leachate quality with age should be expected throughout most of the landfill life
because organic matter will continue to undergo stabilization.
Environmental Risk
The Collier County Landfill consist of 312 acre, located at the north of interstate 75 and east of
County Road 951 in Naples, FL. Collier County Landfill as Onalaska Municipal Landfill, is on top of a
large aquifer, the Everglades aquifer and surrounded by wetlands, also the surrounding area is
consider rural and consists primarily of agricultural lands, although several homes are located close
by. This geographic conditions increase the risk of a negative environmental impact, such as
contamination of the aquifer and canals_ This contamination can increase exponentially as the water
move in to several directions. Historic ground water monitoring flow data shows that the ground water
under the Collier County Landfill flows in all directions. During an accidental spill it will be really
difficult to calculate were the contaminated ground water will flow putting in risk the health of citizens,
animals and plants close by the landfill. Citizens of Collier use this water from the canals for
agriculture and their farms. Citizens and animals drink these waters.
1
16C4
Collier County initiatives to decrease such risks, including the reclamation of two unlined cells these
cells consist of 22 acres located at the north side of the landfill, part of this project was to remove any
hazardous material and reduce the risk of ground water contamination. During this project several
items were removed and processed; such items are tires, metal, concrete, plastic and garbage. This
area will be prepared for several new cells. These new cells will be lined preventing any contact with
the ground water, providing more air space and expanding the life of the landfill.
Unfortunately Collier County Landfill still has an unlined and capped cell, Cell 3-4. This cell is over
twenty years old; base on the life of this cell there is no a significant amount of leachate produced by
this cell, however during extraordinary conditions such as hurricanes or any wet storm event, this cell
can get saturated with rain water producing more leachate. This situation can cause leachate to seep
through the side slopes of the cell ending up in the swales and canals. Other open faces of the landfill
are susceptible to this problem, however if the cells are lined this excessive water will be more likely
contained in to the inside of the cell. The immediate solution to this problem will be to minimize the
moisture inside by discharging the excessive leachate to the lift stations and finally to the water
treatment plant.
Collier County Landfill will continue expanding their capacity creating new cells; these new cells will
increase the volume and will affect the leachate characteristics produced inside them. It is required
by FDEP to keep a minimum amount of leachate accumulated inside the lined cell to minimize any
leachate seepage. With the actual four inch leachate discharge pipe it will be difficult to support the
predicted leachate volume. During a storm event it will be virtually impossible to support the
excessive amount of leachate produced and reduce the moisture content inside the cells to prevent
any of the environmental risks previously mentioned.
It is important to take any preventing measurement that will decrease such a negative environmental
impact. Expanding the capacity of the leachate system by replacing the four inch leachate discharge
pipe to a six inch pipe will reduce any environmental impacts mentioned by decreasing the leachate
volume inside the cells and transporting more leachate to the water treatment plant for proper
disposal.
Contact:
Gabriel Maldonado
Environmental Specialist
Collier County
Solid Waste Management Department
GabrieIMaldonado@collieroov.net
Office 239-252-8483
2
16C4
Leading the Federal
Government's Efforts to
Promote Interagency
Cooperation to Advance the
Use of Innovative Technologies
to Cleanup Hazardous
Waste Contamination
The Federal Remediation Technologies I~onndtahle (FRTR)works to build a
collaborative atmosphere among federal agencies involved in hazardous waste site cleanup.
FRTR was established in 1990 to bring together top federal cleanup program managers and
other remediation community representatives to:
Share information and learn abollt technology-related
efforts of mutual interest,
Discuss future directions of the national site remediation
programs and their impact on the technology market,
Interact with similar state and private industry technology
development programs, and
Form partnerships to purslle sllbjects of mlltual interest.
FRTR members-agencies include:
U.S_ Department of Defense
U_S. Air Force
U.S. Armv
U.S. Navv
U.S. Department of Enerqv
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Environmental Protection Aqencv
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Since its inception, collaborative efforts among the FRTR member-agencies have led to
technology development and demonstration partnerships with private developers, a more
consistent and unified federal approach to technology evaluation and regulatory acceptance,
and a variety of technology transfer tools and other information resources.
http://www .frtr.gov/defa lllt_htm
16Cl,.
16 C 4.,
New Sc,1rd~ )
Downlo.lcl f~l'port
Pump and T.'eat and In Situ Bioventing at Onalaska Municipal
Landfill Supe....und Site, Onalaska, Wisconsin
Site
Name:
Location:
Period of
Operation:
Onalaska Municipal Landfill Superfund Site
Onalaska, Wisconsin
Groundwater
- Pump and Treat (P&T) - June 1994 through November 2001 [data are available
from May 2001 to October/November 2001]
- Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) - November 2001 to present [data are
available from October 2001 to April 2003]
16C4
Soil
-In Situ Bioventing - May 1994 to February 1997
Cleanup
Type:
Full-scale cleanup
Technology:
Pump and Treat
o Five extraction wells located along the downgradient edge of the landfill with a total design
flow rate of 600 to 800 gallons per minute (gpm).
o Treatment system included aeration, clarification, and the addition of sodium hydroxide and
polymer for iron removal.
o Air stripping used to remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
o Treated water was discharged to the river, and the clarifier sludge was dewatered and
disposed in a landfill.
o During its 7.5 years of operation, more than 2 billion gallons of groundwater were extracted
and treated.
Monitored Natural Attenuation
o After the P&T system was shut down, MNA was evaluated to address low levels of
contamination.
o The monitoring network comprises of 26 monitoring points. including 6 air injection wells, 5
piezometers, 13 monitoring wells, and 2 residential wells.
o Analytes include VOCs; metals; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX);
naphthalene; and natural attenuation parameters such as oxidation-reduction potential,
dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and specific conductance.
o Baseline monitoring of natural attenuation was performed in October 2001. The second and
third monitoring events occurred in December 2002 and April 2003.
In Situ Bioventing
o Consisted of injecting air into the area of petroleum nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL)
contamination to stimulate naturally-occurring aerobic microbes and to promote biodegradation
of the organic compounds.
o Area of NAPL contamination targeted was 2.5 acres downgradient of the landfill.
03- to 5-foot NAPL layer was estimated to be at a depth of 8 to 12 feet below ground surface
(bgs).
o System consisted of 29 vertical air injection wells (each 2 inches in diameter, installed on 40-
to 50-foot centers, and screened within the NAPL layer). The wells were connected by a header
piping network to a single aeration well blower and operated between 270 and 320 standard
cubic feet per minute (scfm).
Cleanup Authority:
CERCLA Remedial Action
-- ROD Date: August 14,1990
-- ESD Dates: September 29,2000; November 13,2001
-- Five-Year Reviews: 1998,2003
Contacts:
U_S. Environmental Protection Aaencv Contact:
Michael Berkoff
U_S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5
16C4
77 W. Jackson Blvd
SRF-6J
Chicago, IL 60604
Phone: (312) 353-8983
Fax: (312) 353-8426
State Contact:
Eileen Kramer
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
P.O. Box 4001
Eau Claire, WI 54702
Phone: (715) 839-3824
Fax: (715) 839-6076
Email: kramee@dnr.state.wLus
EPA Support Contractor:
CH2MHill
135 South 84th St, Suite 325
Milwaukee, WI 53214
Phone: (414) 272-2426
Fax (414) 272-4408
Web Site: www.ch2m.com
State Support Contractor:
Peter Moore
ENSR Corporation
4500 Park Glen Road, Suite 210
St. Louis Park. MN 55416
Phone: (952) 924-0117
Contaminants:
VOCs, SVOCs, and metals
-- VOCs (groundwater)- TCE; 1, 1-DCA (800 IJg/L maximum); 1,1, 1-TCA (8IJg/L maximum);
1,1-DCE; 1,2-DCE (27 IJg/L maximum); and BTEX.
-- SVOCs (soil) - petroleum hydrocarbon solvents, primarily naphtha, at levels as high as 550
mg/kg
-- Metals (groundwater) - barium, arsenic, iron, manganese, and lead
Waste Source:
Disposal of municipal and chemical wastes in a landfill
Type/Quantity of Media Treated:
Groundwater
-- 10 to 70 feet below grollnd surface (bgs); 2_17 billion gallons of groundwater treated
Soil
-- 11 to 15 feet bgs (quantity of soil treated was not reported)
Purpose/Significance of Application:
Full-scale remediation of VOCs, SVOCs, and metals in groundwater and soil using P& T, in
situ bioventing, and MNA.
Regulatory Requirements/Cleanup Goals:
2' l:4 1
-- Estimated cleanup goal was 80 to 95 percent reduction of the organic contaminant mass in
the soil (ROD did not establish chemical-specific soil cleanup goals).
-- In 2000, cleanup goals for groundwater were revised to the current state goals in an
explanation of significant differences (ESD).
Results:
P&T
-- The P&T system operated at an average extraction rate of 563 gpm.
-- By May 2001, concentrations for organic contaminants (except benzene and
trimethylbenzene) had decreased to below cleanup goals, based on results for samples
collected from 14 wells located on- and off-site. Arsenic, barium, iron, and manganese
continued to be detected in groundwater at concentrations above the cleanup goals.
-- As of October and November 2001, elevated concentrations of organic contaminants were
present, primarily in one welL Trimethylbenzenes were present in two wells, with
concentrations as high as 670 IJg/L.
-- As of November 2001, arsenic, barium, and manganese were present in several monitoring
wells at levels as high as 14.9, 997IJg/L, and 3,780 IJg/L, respectively.
In Situ BioventinQ
-- The system operated with an air injection rate of 270 to 320 scfm and targeted 3 separate
areas of the site (Areas A, B, and C).
-- In situ bioventing resulted in aerobic soil conditions, as evidenced by a steady increase in
oxygen concentrations at the site. to levels as high as 21 percent. Carbon dioxide
concentrations decreased from an average of 10 percent to less than 1 percent, and average
methane concentrations decreased from 1.4 to 0.1 percent.
-- The average hydrocarbon degradation rate was estimated to be 1 milligram per kilogram per
day (mg/kg/day) in Areas A and Band 0.5 mg/kg/day in Area C.
-- The total mass of hydrocarbons removed was estimated to be 7,780 kilograms (kg) from
Area A; 11,000 kg from Area Band 1,247 kg from Area C.
MNA
-- The results of the December 2002 and April 2003 sampling events showed that the
oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) ranged from 87 to 190 millivolts (mV), indicating that
reductive dechlorination may be occurring. Concentrations of dissolved oxygen ranged from
0.23 to 7.07 milligrams per liter (mg/L), indicating aerobic conditions in the grollndwater
-- As of April 2003, two organic contaminants, trimethlybenzenes and methylene chloride,
remained at concentrations above their respective cleanup goals. In addition, two inorganic
compounds, iron and manganese remain at concentrations above their respective cleanup
goals.
-- Monitoring for natural attenllation continues at the site.
Cost Factors:
-- Operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for the P& T system before the system was shut
down (for 1998 through 2001) were about $200,000 per year including groundwater extraction,
wastewater treatment plant O&M, sampling and monitoring, monitoring well maintenance, and
reporting_ After system shutdown, O&M costs were about $60,000 per year for 2002 and 2003.
Description:
16C4
The On alaska Municipal Landfill Superfund Site is located in Onalaska, Wisconsin and was
originally used as a sand and gravel quarry from the early to mid-1960s. In the mid-1960s, the
Town of Onalaska began using the site as a landfill for both municipal and chemical wastes.
Landfill operations stopped in September 1980, and the landfill was capped in June 1982.
Subsequent investigations found elevated levels of VOCs and metals in a groundwater plume
that extended at least 800 feet from the southwestern edge of the landfill and discharged to
nearby wetlands and the adjacent Black River. The aquifer beneath the landfill served as the
primary source of drinking water for the residents in the area. In addition, soils above the
groundwater table and adjacent to the southwestern edge of the landfill were contaminated
with petroleum solvents.
The site was placed on the National Priorities List in September 1984 and remedial
investigations were conducted in 1988 and 1989. A record of decision (ROO) was signed in
August 1990, which specified a P&T system for groundwater and in situ bioventing for soils.
The P&T system operated from June 1994 through November 2001 and was designed to
remove VOCs and metals. In situ bioventing operated from May 1994 to February 1997. In
1998, as part of the first 5-year review, EPA concluded that bioventing was no longer affecting
biodegradation, and the system was shut down. Based on confirmation of oxygen levels in soil
gas, EPA determined that the bioremediation cleanup phase was completed. An ESO was
issued in November 2001 that allowed for the temporary shutdown of the P& T system to
evaluate the effectiveness of MNA, based on the long-term groundwater monitoring that was
being conducted at the site. Monitoring of natural attenuation at the site is ongoing.
Operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for the P& T system before the system was shut
down (for 1998 through 2001) were about $200,000 per year including groundwater extraction,
wastewater treatment plant O&M, sampling and monitoring, monitoring well maintenance, and
reporting. After system shutdown, O&M costs were about $60,000 per year for 2002 and 2003_
http://costperformance.ora/profile_cfm?10=387&CaseI0=387
Note, this web site has a helpful glossary of terms and acronyms.
16C4
From: JayeDavid
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:21 PM
To: waller_d
Cc: AtkinsonDayne; MaldonadoGabriel
Subject: Seeking cost estimates for leachate callsed plant upset
Sir:
I'm writing a FEMA grant application to help fllnd a six inch landfill leachate pipe. The FEMA cost/benefit analysis ranks
the project higher if we can estimate the environmental/economic damages minimized by the proposed project.
Ifyollr waste water treatment plants gets a slug of contaminated water (leachate) and it causes an llpset to the plant
process, what are the economic ramifications? How long will it take YOllr plant to get back on line?
Is it possible to get estimated costs for a minimum plant off line, average off line and worst case scenario? Thank you!
David Jaye
Recycling Coordinator
Collier COllnty Solid Waste Management Department
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building H, 3rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112-4961
239-252-7620 (0)
239-774-9222 (f)
586-381-1088 (cell)
2
JayeDavid
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
16Ct,.
f
waller_d
Wednesday, April 01. 2009 3:08 PM
JayeDavid
AtkinsonDayne; MaldonadoGabriel
RE: Seeking cost estimates for leachate caused plant upset
SCRWTP 12-MGD RO EXPANSION
Summary of spill costs
South County Regional Water Treatment Plant
Amount
Chemical flow into ground storage tank:
12% Sodium Hypochlorite
Caustic flow to sewer:
50% Callstic
Potable water flushing
Staff time
Sllb-Total
6,000 gal.
500,000 gal.
5 hrs.
Cost/unit
Total
500 gal. $0.697
$348.50
$1.8712 $11,227.20
$.00515 $2,575.00
$26.00 $130.00
$14.280.70
South County Water Reclamation Facility
Amount
Callstic flow to sewer:
Reuse water lost
Additional power (blower)
Operator overtime
Plant Manager overtime
Sllb- Total
21,690,000 gal.
5,916 KWH
8 hrs.
19 hrs.
Grand Total
Additional Costs:
Cost/unit
Total
$0.30jkgal.
$0.082
$6,507.00
$485.11
$247.40
$688.73
$7.928.24
$22.208.94
In addition to the above O&M costs, the chemical spill did some damage to the SCWRF effluent filters that had
to be repaired by an outside contractor. The cost of those repairs was approx. $ 45,000 in addition to the
above O&M costs.
{_H- fZ' /,,vc/J,y-t
i )::2.,d'> 6' .1'1
C;~~ (J v 0, (].J
% /-" / tillr'"N,....-k
D.waller
1
,# ~V1- J. g. '7' 'I
J
16Ct,.
JayeDavid
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
gammelU
Monday, March 30, 2009 9:46 AM
JayeDavid
RE: Seeking sewer line break information
-m
~
~ ~ ~ ~
. .
Vallety Stream Vallety Stream Vallety Stream Vallety Stream
Drive forcemain... Drive forcemain... Drive forcemain... Drive forcemain...
Contigency Plan for
Rattlesnak.. .
Valley Stream Drive
Force main...
-m
II and lightning
Storm Prepare...
David,
Best way to prevent any spills getting into the environment have contingency plan in place for force main breaks and
storm events. As you can see in the Valley Stream break first thing you do is use equipment to contain the spill from
getting into a waterway. Second is isolate flow from the spill close valves and shut off pump station shut to minimize the
spill. Third pump out the spill with a pumper trucks and make repair and lime the spill site to disinfect the area. Call local
agencies that need to be notified. Storm event have a plan before the storm arrives. Make sure you have the equipment
you need and the most important thing is to have your personnel properly trained on how to handle the situation to
minimize the environmental impact Also have outside contractors under contract to do repairs in an emergencies and
pumper truck contractor to remove the spill. When collections does tie ins with contactors on force main connections we
do a contingency plan the insure no wastewater gets on the grollnd or in the environment's hope this help you.
Jim
From:
Sent:
To:
Ce:
Subject:
JayeDavid
Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:43 AM
gammelU
AtkinsonDayne; MaldonadoGabriel
Seeking sewer line break information
Sir:
Thank you for the courtesy of sllch a prompt call. I was very impressed with YOllr direct knowledge and history with the
landfill scale house leachate system.
When your schedule permits, please send me copies of your reports on sewer line breaks which I can hopefully llses as a
proxy for a landfill leachate leak or break. Any other direction or sllggestions would be very helpful.
I was very impressed with your talent to tell a story abollt these technical events in terms an average person can
understand. If possible, I hope you might be able to review the FEMA grant proposal narrative to make sure I'm getting
the story correct.
I have attached the Brown and Caldwell proposal to llpgrade the landfill leachate system for your review. They have a
three alternative study.
The bottom line is I am trying to provide some case studies which might provide some dollar estimates for
environmental problems avoided for FEMA to agree to assist in the funding of this $320,000 proposal.
<< File: Evaluation of Landfill Leachate Management Options.pdf>>
1
16C4
Valley Stream Drive force main sewer line break emergency clean up
Photos A
16C,,-
Valley Stream Drive force main sewer line break emergency clean up
Photos B
~ '....d. ,
~ .---, .-.......7 ----......~,~--. '-...>. Vy'-"'-...,:f\.........;; ,,- ,,",.:,
-- /
r1--'~,
',....._-c-\...--zt
Co~!: ~unty
- -
__ O,l- ,I. ~- f...-(........
. ..' : i';J ,-,
Collier County Wastewater CoUections
Shut Down Contin2encv Plan Form
Date Plan Is Constructed:
Job: Ratti snake Hammock Rd. Two Tie Ins on 20" Foree main
Meeting Attendees (Specify ~ompany Names Also):
""'''''l 6-a-_......~(1 u..,." ~'-i C~.IIC'L~O"",S;
- ,
Date of Shut Down 3/5/08 11:00 PM
Contingency Plan Summary: Colleetlou will shut dO'l'l'D a total of 50 stations from Davis
Blvd. going South on 951 to Verona Walk and also all private stations. Telemetry will start
pumping all stations down starting at 9:00 PM In these areas and will be monitoring the
well levels. Contractor Is going to have two sites excavated and tined with plastic to prevent
any spills on ground. At these two sites the line stopping tapping saddle 11'11I be Installed tbe
day before and all piping preassembled on the site. Contractor or transportation will pay
for 10 pumper truckll and make the arnngements to have them on site for collection crews
to pump down stations during this shut down. This shut down will happen at n~t due to
theOowsandtheslzeofthearea. C".,!-...-../....t ff....-+.,..J I"" -_,r{ .b<: cc-7J1<-I-...{
J7 f;a 11M
AddItIonal Comments: Contractor will have all emergency parts on site and Ume. Fred
Sexton and Collections will inspect the site on Wednesday morning to confiJ'm we are ready
to proceed with the shut down. Pumper trucks will be paid by the project see the attached
e-maiL Colleetlons crew will move pumper trucks to stations as need and also directed by
~~~~&~~ ~e~~:!lI<)~~h:!:i~tco~~~~~n ~~.pro~~~y:~~-:e;?:.~
S;". IJ? /X..- r c.~ I-I~e:- IA...';:- O'..'....M ~'. 7/..$'/ C r.
16C4
i
Si;natures of Meeting Attendees:
.:r~~
16C4
Contact Numbers for Meeting Attendees:
7; j.., {,:-.. ..'..... q J-;;<.5 "~() J 17
-Js~'" ~L;X,\,
'..J
~A,J KE""tl('~('7 5<i-/(""~,J,(,,/',
,i', . /
'f' -..l-'"
'('\ C' 7:
. (.....-...;
. _. 'i J(~ ..,..
c .......
~- .f~~/(,
2/?-YU"/ '- v
U,CZG
-r'-<.\ .( .
--.J ---
jK'L rJttl
')(~'~I'~<' I(
, . / '
/l-AV"i,:-Irf';"1 f. J"}~/-~J vI/, tS Sf.-/6//, ;:..:.'?-,;
c:/.'- c_Ct"Y /(:/.-,i: y .~. ,- rt<-
:.j~"'l'~ rkFFUF.r......I.~.fK IJIi'$QIV!.<I,t.l.-te 2~'1- ''62<;;". OZ7+
Lt< t\ itl (c.,....ry WI'>kl.4\.hr (r I/a !-tCM>
(. t ' (' .'il L\ C". . .
_~: ~Uc {t~. ( '- 'J J.... ~...i
2'3<1-"j"'f(_6{ '5(...
/ ..' 'f ....i, J (' tf<.r..
>j;/{f.J,1
JPk"'~ Zu".~.-
/1"~C"'t
<t~'1 ;ZJ~- tr1r
Ja 1"1# ....:50 z::..vc..~..@ r~J/, ';':,p...-v_"..
d---
From: nagLs
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:14 AM
To: SextonFred; gammellJ
Ce: dillarcCr. EdwardsDonald
Subject: RE: PO please advise vendor to put this number on invoice..
Thanks, Fred. Jim will include it in the contingency plan ..Steve
I'nm:
-
To:
CC:
SUbject:
SexlDIIFred
Thursday, ~ 14, 2006 6:57 AM
lla"'",elU; nagyJ
d1lwJ
FW: PO please advise venda' to put this number on Invoice..
Good morning Jim and Steve,
This is the PO for the Rattlesnake Hammock 6 Lane project for the 20" FM tie-in pumper trucks
that will be scheduled within the next couple of weeks.
Any questions please give me a call.
Thanks.
:free[ Sexton
ReId EngIneering Inspector
PublIc UtilItIes EngIneering Department
Collier County Goverment
4370 Mercentlle Ave.
N.pl.., florid. 34104
OffIce 239-252-2599
From: ZuverJames
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:40 AM
To: SexlDnFred
Cc: Brian Kelley (BrianKellev@wilsonmiller.coml
Subject: FW: PO please advise vendor to put this number on Invoke..
Fred.
Attached is the PO for the F.attlesnake pumper trucks for the FM tie-in.
Can you do this or can I just take it the the collection meeting?
Jim
I'nm:
-
To:
SUbject:
taylor_'
Wednesday, February 13, 2006 9:18 AM
ZuwrJames
PO please advise venda' to pot this number on 1nYclal..
<< File: PO .pdf>>
16CJ,.
3
Rattlesnake Hammock
20" and 6" Force Main tie Ins
20" and 6" Force Main tie in
Prep work
1) Line stop saddles are installed and concrete is poured
2) Restraints are installed
3) Pressure test has passed on the 20" and 6" lines
4) All valves have been located
Tie in
I) Rangeline will mob in the day the tie in is schedllled. They will install there Eq
and do a 2" wet tap on main to insure that once they drop the stops into place that
they are holding.
2) Once we insure that the stops are holding we will Yac out the appx 100 feet
between stops to allow the 2 lines to be tied in.
3) ICI will then cut the existing line and install the 45's and pipe to make the tie in
and close the existing valve on the old line.
4) At the same time that the 20" is on going ICI will shut the two 4" valves and shut
down the Lift station's at Skyway. ICI will then start the tie in on the 4" lines.
5) Once both tie ins are in progress we will start the process of empting the old line.
6) Once both tie ins are complete ICI will install the ARY's (temporary) open the
valve on the new line, open the 4" and restart the lift station.
7) Remove line stops.
8) As built all fittings.
9) Back fill will be handled during the day.
Material List:
20" & 6" all with MellI
2 - 45's
1 -11.25
1 - 22.5
I - 20" sleeve
I - 20" Wrap around sleeve
1 - 20" Plug
1 - Stick of20" C - 900
2 - 6" 45s
I - 6x4 Tee
1 - 6x4 Reducer
2 - 4" 45s
I - 4" plug valve
1 - Stick of 6" C-9oo
1 - Stick of 4" C-9oo
Eu. JUt
3 light towers
3 Chop saws
2 Yac trucks
16C4"
~
4
Plge
1 / 2
::l' ... "7 ..,.. f''''~m" -~ ~~,...,..."..,.. ," i ~ ,. , "",
1ir....' ('~" 'S.:4 \ ,. l:'f~'_ "~"7'1{. .^"; ;
r ~1,,':,:''>-:kt: ni) .~)f, _,". '"-;.,,.' "T~~ _ *' . ~
SOUTHERN SANITATION INC
PO Box 7736
NAPLES FL 34101
PO number/date
4500091462 / 02/12/200B
Ccntad personITelephone
TBCH Admin
Our Tax Exemption no.
B5-B012621B30C-2
Send invoice to:
Board of County Commissioners
Attn. Finance Department
PO Box 413016
Naples. Florida 34101-3016
Your vendor number with us
102773
Please deliver to:
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING &
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
2885 S HORSBSHOE DR
NAPLES FL 34104
Delivery date:
Day 09/30/2008
Terms of delivery: FOB DESTINATION
Terms of payment: Net 30 Days (20 business days)
Item Material
Order qly.
Description
Unit
Price per unit
Net value
00010 AN CNTRCT ~lRG SCHDL GRSE SLUOG SEWG RAN
20,000.00000 each 1.00 20,000.00
Rel. ord. against contract 4600001769 Item 00010
07-4191; BCC APPR 11/13/07; ITEM 16C2
313-163676-634999-60169
Total net value excl. tax
20.000.00
THIS ORDER SUBJEC- TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. TN. purchu. OflHr ill eonlider'1lCllG ~. I<ngl. COl'lu.ct. PIymeIlI will be m.. upon COlT\PIIlion Qf lotal oro.r. No ~., ~. witl be m_ will'1oul proper IlJthorlzallon.
2. ~ClfderflUl'l'lbwlllUlllllO~.ron'llinvoleel,pIIcQg.',Ol' g)fTft~.
3. The CClWIIy 1'eMr'Y"" righllo canc:.l ~ portion ~ ltIi. onw If not f"'-d II .p.diW.
4.P~wtlIo.m.-onIJ'ir'l.CCDrdente>MthIhI'Dl'lHI', c:orr.dionlorptlce~'~Ibt:~edbrIMPurchating D..ectorpriorlolhl~ofggodll.
5. o.fecUw ~ will bot prompdy ~. VIInlIor'. Illpen8I ~ CledlllMert
e. DiKountt of pl'OI'Ilpl ~ WIll till com,oultd rrom dele or NeeIpt of;ocdl 01' fh;Jm d.. cI.--ip. of~. wrichhw i.~.
T. II i. ~ In. ~ de~ .h11Il~ with a" t.derwl, .t.., Of 10",1_ rtllllllv, UW,..tCl,..-ad INtIhe Vtndar thiIllcS.fan::l1lCtiClnt Ofa-lm.tIrCIugnI rcI_ ~ IheDuy....tCIm~" COM,
C1fdam9byreMor\cfac:n..loral'-ted~CIf'-Il"'~
.. lJnInIan.VendDr irIdIcMe. CItherwiM, inltl.rionof\llUtll: II1a'tconltlUl.lICCeptance oflhePurchl,. Ordern:tuclirlg.n ~..
.. l'heVenDClrtlgrH.1CI rtlimburument C1f\r1l~ "PIn... in ec:c:ordIncewilh flClria SlllllAe CNptw '12_081, II.- Diem IrdTraY'el~. of Public Otricert, .mplo~.. Ind IUlhcIrizICl pencln',
10. All ahi...-ulco bt ,~ OIt:lin.tion,
j
------
Page 1 of2
gammelU
16C4
From: MildenAnthony
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 9;35 AM
To: gammell...J; nagy-s
Cc: SheltonSteve
Subject: Stations that will be affected - 20" FM Shutdown on Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd
Jim:
Here is a list ofthe stations that will need to be shutdown:
Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd East l20" FM)
. Wing South Air Park
. 302.54
. 302.55
. 302.56
. Sierra Grande
. 302.57
. Naples lakes
. 302.50
. 302.51
. 302.52
. 302.53
. Islandia (formerly Club Estates)
. 302.46
. Naples Heritage
. 302.37
. 302.38
. 302.39
. 302.40
. 302.41
. Forest Glen
. 302.42
. 302.43
. 302.44
. 302.47
. Verona Walk
. 302.60
. 302.61
. 302.62
. 302_63
. 302.64
. 302.65
l~
)
~
313nOO8
Page 2 of2
16C4
06./
Have a great day, L e J 1 M (,...<.' ~
f'/'.l.....t-e
l1"tio? tT tl/t1l""
GIS T echnlclan
Collier County Government
Wastewater Stakes & locales
Oflice: 239-591-0882
F8X:239-591~10
Ar'tthonyMilden@colliergov.net
Cc:nA.,~ L "/7 CV'!v.^e .o/<!;'ve
3/3/2008
1-
c
16C4
:r c ~11.t;y
I ct I AND UOHTININ<J STORM PREPAREDNESS
WASTIlWATER COLLECTIONS
I119f2OOl
>> AD Master Stlltlcms haVe "- fueIed
>> POI1IIlle 0-...... have "- fueled
>> AD ""--..II'" beeD IIOtItW of~ ClIIIl1IIId by
>> Crews_.... 8IId .....1,'8 ~ lrlICb dIIIf
>> Have -WfIllq -_ for PIeet 8IId DbUi..
>> eoo-.ed SoutheIn ~ tbl!y IIIIl)'be 011 NDd by
>> ~~_b, I.40Sp-.T8CltPlc'.
>> 30 Spere Tl~ AiIteDuld
>> All ~ have cbecked their PPH cquipmeut
>> Lime stored at Shirley St.
>> LIme stoIed at South pUnt
>> SeaIon are pairlna up pclI'lIOIIIIeI who live close to each other for pick after
the event.
>> UpcWed&-.~, ~ClUIiat
>> }olodfyOl.... i~.of"'~1tllIId by
>> Cbecbd all JIONbIe UuII pump. fbr operatiolI8IId fuel
>> Top off all spen ps 8IId diaeI_
>> Cbecbcl all pre cocIeI to IUbcIi'viIiGoI
>> 13 N_ Oe.it...... Ddiwnld to CoIJectioas
>> N_ VICtor TIlldc Delivered to CoIJectioas
>> Telemetry UppedeI to Data Flo,r Software
>> IIISllIIIed IorJpr bour Il,.- 1.,. ~1e6 on teItmelry SbIIicms
c
~~-r
16C4
c
:.0....... ~"ty
AFTER ACTION REPORT
WASTEWATER - Collections
I. Description oflncident Includinl!: Cause of Problem: 8' Force main break on Valley
Stream Drive behind Buckeye Palms.
II. Description of Our Response to Correct Problem: Collection received a call from Russ
from Mitchell &Stark at 4:00pm saying their equipment operator drove over the
8"abandoned force main causing a SSO. Jim Gammell and the second shift responded to the
site. Once on site the contractor was already capping off the abandoned force main on the
eastside ofthe canal. Force main crossing the canal will be removed today and capped on the
west side due to the line has to be removed which is in conflict with the Storm water Project.
Contractor had an excavation area arollnd the break to contain the SSO. Contractor removed
the wastewater in the contained area and added lime. DEP, Pollution Control and Health
department was notified of the 200gal. SSG.
III. Backl!:round Information on Affected Facilities
A. Age: 8" force main is 25 years old
B. Last Time Maintained: (None) 8" abandoned force main is underground and there is no
way to visually inspect the line during routine maintenance of station.
C. Current Frequency of Planned Maintenance: No maintenance is required to force mains
the pipe it is buried underground. No way to inspect abandoned force mains
underground.
D. Prior Similar Incidents? If yes, describe: No records or knowledge of this 8" force main
getting hit by operator of heavy equipment working next to the canal at the above
address.
VII.Conclusions and Recommendations
A. Lesson Learned: Equipment operators needs to be more aware of s surroundings of
located lines on job site and not to drive over them due to the weight of their equipment
may damage the underground piping.
B. Proposed Action to prevent Reoccurrence of Problem: Contractors needs to train equipment
operators when driving or operating equipment around located force mains to be more careful
.
16C4
DIVISION
OF
STATE OF FLORIDA
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
CHARLIE CRIST
Governor
W. CRAIG FUGATE
Director
HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
PRE-AWARD COST REQUEST FORM
To request Pre-Award Costs, please complete this form and submit with your HMGP application. All ELIGIBLE
pre-award costs are subject to an approved grant award and availability of funding. If funding is not available or the
project is not approved, pre-award costs will NOT be reimbursed and will be solely the responsibility of the
applicant. If your project is approved and pre-award costs are eligible, the cost share for the reimbursement of these
activities is 75/25 (same as other projects).
Disaster:
Tropical Stonn Fay
Name of Applicant:
Collier County Solid Waste Management Department
Project Title:
Collier County Landfill Leachate Six inch HOPE pipe
Start Date for Pre-Award Activities:
Pre-award costs associated with tllis request incurred prior to the date of declaration are NOT eligible. These
costs include: study or research to plan project, engineering, modeling, permitting or environmental study. These
costs must be reflected as a line item in the project budget. Construction costs should NOT be included.
Construction activities may NOT begin until after a contract has been fully execl/ted with the State for this
project.
Activity Estimated Cost Estimated Start Date
Project & Grant Management, 125 Hours x $39 hour $4,875 10/1108
Proiect Manager
Project & Grant Management, 125 Hours x $36 hour - $4,500 2/2/09
Recvclin~ Soecialist
Project & Grant Management, 35 hours x $34 hour- $1,190 10/1108
Environmental Soecialist
Grant Management. Manager Waste 15 hours x $48.46 - $726.90 2/2109
Reduction and Recycling
Solid Waste Operations Manager 10 hours x $4529 $452.90 10/1108
Total Pre-Award Request $11,744.80
Point of Contact tnformation:
Name:
David Jaye
Title: Recycling Specialist
Agency:
Solid Waste Management Department
1101 T::Imi::lmi Tr::lil F Rllilclinj? H 1rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112
Address:
Phone:
239-252-7620
Email: davidjaye@colliergov.net
Authorized Applicant Agent:
Name:
Donna Fiala
Title: Chainnan, Collier County Board of Commissioners
Signature:
Date:
FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFICE
36 Skyline Drive
Lake Mary, FL 32746-6201
. DIVISION HEADQUARTERS.
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Tel: 850-413-9969 . Fax: 850-488-1016
www.FloridaDisaster.ora
STATE LOGISTICS RESPONSE CENTER
2702 Directors Row
Orlando, FL 32809-5631
8la Tl1lralpr Coun. Sune 300
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tal: (407) 661-9500
Fax: (407) 661-9599
16C4
April 3, 2009
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
Project Manager
Collier County Public Utilities Engineering Department
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building H
Naples, FL 34112
011
041182-
Subject:
Environmental Benefits of
Proposed Leachate Storage and Transfer System Construction Project
Dear Mr. Atkinson:
The purpose of this letter is to document the environmental benefits of the Proposed
Collier County leachate storage and transfer system construction project. It is anticipated
that this letter will be used to obtain grant funding for this project under the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Tropical Storm Fay Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program. The information in this letter is divided into three sections: (I) Grant Program
Objectives; (2) Projecl Background; and (3) Environmental Benefils of Project.
GRANT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The Hazard Mitigation Granl Program is designed to assiSl in implemenling long-term
hazard mitigalion measures following a major disasler declaration. The Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines hazard mitigation as an action intended
to reduce repetitive losses from future natural disasters. In this context, "repetitive" refers
to similar Iypes of losses caused by a recurring natural hazard. The term "losses" refers to
expenditures for the repair or replacemenl of public and private property, and for the relief
of personal loss or other hardship.
LEACHATE STORAGE AND TRANSFER SYSTEM PROJECT
The leachate storage and transfer system projecl is expecled to be constructed in two
phases. Phase I consisls of replacing approximalely 3,000 linear feel (LF) of exisling 4-
inch diameler leachale forcemain piping wilh new 6-inch diameter leachale forcemain
piping. The COSI estimale for Phase I is $260,000. Phase 2 consislS of inSlalling a new
500,000 gallon leachale slorage tank along wilh a new leachate pump slalion and relaled
ENI' ,.,'IlI!l~"(J'/ Ii!! I rl~"rl 6- Conlulranrs
16C4
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
April 3, 2009
Page 2
appunenances at the Naples Landfill site. The cost estimate for Phase 2 is $684,000. The
total estimated construction cost for Phase I and Phase 2 is estimated to be $944,000_
PROJECf BACKGROUND
The following paragraphs provide background information on quantity, composition, as
well as fate of leachate from the Naples Landfill.
Leachate Quantity. The amount of leachate produced from a landfill varies based on the
amount of precipitation and the age and type of waste within a landfill. The greatest
leachate production from an active landfill cell typically occurs during a prolonged
precipitation event. The amount of leachate that must be pumped out of the landfill during
a prolonged precipitation event can be more than an order of magnitude greater than the
average amount pumped. The future average daily volume of leachate flow from the
Naples Landfill is estimated to be 38.400 gallons for the year 2017. The future peak daily
volume of leachate flow from the Naples Landfill is estimated to be 499,600 gallons in the
year 2017.
Leachate Composition. In general, leachate has high COD, organic carbon, nitrogen,
chloride, iron, manganese and phenol concentrations. Many other chemicals are typically
present in landfill leachate, including pesticides,solvents and heavy metals.
Fate of Leachate from Naples Landrill. Leachate from the Naples Landfill is currently
pumped to the South County Water Reclamation Facility (SCWRFl, where it is mixed
with domestic wastewater and treated. The primary means of disposal of all treated
effluent from SCWRF is slow rate land application of reclaimed water to public access
reuse sites, including residential, commercial and recreational (primarily golf courses)
customers. Reclaimed water from SCWRF is also currently utilized to mitigate a wetland
area. The County is in the process of pursuing a reuse water aquifer storage and recovery
(ASR) project near the Livingston Road Wellfield. The purpose of the ASR project will
be to store excess reclaimed water in the wet season for use during the dry season, which
should help to protect and preserve the fresh and potable water supply in the region.
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF PROJECT
Phase 1 - New Leachate Forcemaln Construction. Florida Depanment of
Environmental Protection (FOEP) regulations require that a depth of no more than 12-
inches of leachate be allowed to accumulate over the bottom liner of a landfill, except
during a storm event. When leachate accumulates to depths that are greater than 12-inches
over the bottom liner, there is an increased threat of leachate seeping over the landfill
containment berms, through the landfill side, andlor leaking through the bottom liner_
Such leaks threaten the environment because they can lead to contamination of
groundwater or surface water resources.
The cleanup of leachate contaminated soils can be costly, and can range from $100,000 to
beyond $500,000. It is harder to estimate the cost or long term effects that contamination
of groundwater or surface waters has on human beings and wildlife.
16C4
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
April 3, 2009
Page 3
Hydraulic models indicate that upgrading the existing 4-inch diameter leachate forcemain
to a 6-inch diameter leachate force main is required to remove the projected peak day
leachate volume generated during extreme storm eveRls up to the Year 2017.
Phase 2 . Leachate Storage Tank. Treatment of landfill leachate by domestic
wastewater treatment plants is common but may present some problems. Landfill leachate
may be difficult to treat because it typically cORlains very high ammonia nitrogen
concentration, it is very acidic, and it is often anoxic. The overall effect of leachate
addition on the treatmeRl processes utilized at a domestic wastewater treatment plant is
most dependent on the proportion of leachate being treated at the facility. Typically.
sending leachate to a domestic wastewater treatment facility at a continuous lower flow
rate is preferable to sending larger volumes on a periodic basis because it allows colonies
of specific microorganisms to develop at the treatment facility that can utilize uncommon
biodegradable compounds in leachate. A continuous lower rate of leachate addition
reduces the potential for upset of the treatment processes as well as reduces the
concentration of non biodegradable compounds in treatment facility effluent and sewage
sludge.
Installing a leachate storage tank at the Naples Landfill will allow the County to cease
transmission of leachate to the South County Water Reclamation Facility for certain
periods of time if required by wastewater operations personnel. Additionally. installation
of a storage tank to collect peak volumes of leachate generated during extreme storm
events will minimize the potential for treatment process upsets at the wastewater treatment
plant that can result if sudden large leachate volumes eRler the facility. Preventing process
upsets at SCWRF will help prevent water quality permit violations; thus protecting the
environment from cORlamination.
I hope that this letter helps you to understand the environmental benefits of the proposed
leachate storage and transfer system project. If you have any additional questions, please
call me at 407-661-9593.
Best Regards.
BROWN AND CALDWELL
J9~5:ESml+n
Principal Engineer
Copies to: Hala Stier. BC
Jaye David, Collier County
II R (j II \ \, [)
( I I [) II ILL
850 Trafalgar Court, Suite 300
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tel: (407) 661-9500
Fax: (407) 661-9599
16'C4
April 3, 2009
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
Project Manager
Collier COllnty Public Utilities Engineering Department
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bllilding H
Naples, FL 34112
OIl
041182-
Snbject:
Environmental Benefits of
Proposed Leachate Storage and Transfer System Construction Project
Dear ML Atkinson:
The pllrpose of this letter is to document the environmental benefits of the proposed
Collier County leachate storage and transfer system construction project. It is anticipated
that this letter will be llsed to obtain grant funding for this project llnder the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Tropical Storm Fay Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program. The information in this letter is divided into three sections: (I) Grant Program
Objectives; (2) Project Background; and (3) Environmental Benefits of Project.
GRANT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is designed to assist in implementing long-term
bazard mitigation meaSllres following a major disaster declaration. The Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines hazard mitigation as an action intended
to reduce repetitive losses from flltllre natural disasters. In this context, "repetitive" refers
to similar types of losses caused by a recllrring natllral hazard. The term "losses" refers to
expenditllres for the repair or replacement of Pllblic and private property, and for the relief
of personal loss or other hardship.
LEACHATE STORAGE AND TRANSFER SYSTEM PROJECT
The leachate storage and transfer system project is expected to be constructed in two
phases. Phase I consists of replacing approximately 3,000 linear feet (LF) of existing 4-
inch diameter leachate forcemain piping with new 6-inch diameter leachate forcemain
piping_ The cost estimate for Phase I is $260,000. Phase 2 consists of installing a new
500,000 gallon leachate storage tank along with a new leachate pump station and related
Envjro"m~ntlll Engin~~Ts & Consultants
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
April 3, 2009
Page 2
16C4
appurtenances at the Naples Landfill site. The cost estimate for Phase 2 is $684,000. The
total estimated construction cost for Phase I and Phase 2 is estimated to be $944,000.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The following paragraphs provide background infonnation on qllantity, composition, as
well as fate ofleachate from the Naples Landfill.
Leachate Quantity_ The amollnt of leachate prodllced from a landfill varies based on the
amount of precipitation and the age and type of waste within a landfill. The greatest
leachate production from an active landfill cell typically OCCllrs during a prolonged
precipitation event. The amollnt ofleachate that mllst be pumped Ollt of the landfill dllring
a prolonged precipitation event can be more than an order of magnitllde greater than the
average amollnt pllmped. The flltllre average daily volllme of leachate flow from the
Naples Landfill is estimated to be 38,400 gallons for the year 2017. The fllture peak daily
volume of leachate flow from the Naples Landfill is estimated to be 499,600 gallons in the
year 2017.
Leachate Composition. In general, leachate has high COD, organic carbon, nitrogen,
chloride, iron, manganese and phenol concentrations. Many other chemicals are typically
present in landfill leachate, inclllding pesticides, solvents and heavy metals.
Fate of Leachate from Naples Landfill. Leachate from the Naples Landfill is currently
pllmped to the SOllth COllnty Water Reclamation Facility (SCWRF), where it is mixed
with domestic wastewater and treated. The primary means of disposal of all treated
effluent from SCWRF is slow rate land application of reclaimed water to Pllblic access
rellse sites, including residential, commercial and recreational (primarily golf courses)
cllstomers. Reclaimed water from SCWRF is also cllrrently lltilized to mitigate a wetland
area. The COllnty is in the process of pursuing a reuse water aqllifer storage and recovery
(ASR) project near the Livingston Road Wellfield. The purpose of the ASR project will
be to store excess reclaimed water in the wet season for llse dllring the dry season, which
shollld help to protect and preserve the fresh and potable water sllpply in the region.
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF PROJECT
Phase 1 - New Leachate Forcemain Construction. Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations reqllire that a depth of no more than 12-
inches of leachate be allowed to accllmulate over the bottom liner of a landfill, except
dllring a stonn event. When leachate accumlllates to depths that are greater than l2-inches
over the bottom liner, there is an increased threat of leachate seeping over the landfill
containment benns, through the landfill side, and/or leaking through the bottom liner.
Sllch leaks threaten the environment becallse they can lead to contamination of
groundwater or sllrface water resources.
The cleanllp of leachate contaminated soils can be costly, and can range from $100,000 to
beyond $500,000. It is harder to estimate the cost or long tenn effects that contamination
of grollndwater or surface waters has on human beings and wildlife.
Mr. Dayne Atkinson
April 3, 2009
Page 3
16C4.
Hydraulic models indicate that upgrading the existing 4-inch diameter leachate forcemain
to a 6-inch diameter leachate force main is required to remove the projected peak day
leachate volume generated dllring extreme storm events up to the Year 2017.
Phase 2 - Leachate Storage Tank. Treatment of landfill leachate by domestic
wastewater treatment plants is common bllt may present some problems. Landfill leachate
may be difficlllt to treat becallse it typically contains very high ammonia nitrogen
concentration, it is very acidic, and it is often anoxic. The overall effect of leachate
addition on the treatment processes lltilized at a domestic wastewater treatment plant is
most dependent on the proportion of leachate heing treated at the facility. Typically,
sending leachate to a domestic wastewater treatment facility at a continllolls lower flow
rate is preferable to sending larger volllmes on a periodic basis becallse it allows colonies
of specific microorganisms to develop at the treatment facility that can lltilize uncommon
biodegradable compollnds in leachate. A continuOllS lower rate of leachate addition
redllces the potential for upset of the treatment processes as well as redllces the
concentration of nonbiodegradable compollnds in treatment facility efflllent and sewage
sllldge.
Installing a leachate storage tank at the Naples Landfill will allow the COllnty to cease
transmission of leachate to the SOllth COllnty Water Reclamation Facility for certain
periods of time if reqllired by wastewater operations personnel. Additionally, installation
of a storage tank to collect peak volumes of leachate generated dllring extreme stonn
events will minimize the potential for treatment process upsets at the wastewater treatment
plant that can reslllt if slldden large leachate volllmes enter the facility. Preventing process
llpsets at SCWRF will help prevent water quality pennit violations; thus protecting the
environment from contamination.
I hope that this letter helps YOll to llnderstand the environmental benefits of the proposed
leachate storage and transfer system project. If you have any additional questions, please
call me at 407-661-9593.
Best Regards,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
June A. Smith, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Copies to: Hala Stier, Be
Jaye David, Collier County
l6C4
Case Study Photos Landfill Leachate Leaks
Grass and other plants cover the municipal solid waste landfill.
Occasionally. leachate may seep through weak point in the covering and come out on to the surface. It appears black
and bubbly. Later, it will stain the ground red. Leachate seepages are promptly repaired by excavating the area
around the seepage and filling it with well.compacted soil to divert the fiow of leachate back into the landfill.
.'
.-:
~
',-
;
.>
,-
t: ''? ';.,.:;: "'~ - .....or '
.,~ ,. ,;".:." "'?'P" _. n ,'" 'f!' E' >"
_ :',,' _ , ~~,' ,~' ..,' . ,~'''''''' _ ..:-,":"'.
. ~..', '._ ~ ..':,;'. . l' . " ,- ~~-#I ~ ~.:s;;,rf'1/r::rr/- t.:' .c~
,_~ .' , _ .:,,': _ .:_;,,,,",.' ....--,." "c-?~"'<- -/:.--;;~
, 'j;;'" ;-r,$f..~; ~t<";:-< -;..r- ~ ~ . " .;1ti . -~~:~"._' . ,-; ,
,,,_, _ 1,-'" f ' ~. ._." ",,"J> " '.. t-J"".r"'''-;~ ' ,.
..', __~. ,";'. '. .' # .-:,..:.u::~""_",,,,.,:--'
_' .,' .,., _,' ...... _ ..~......,:+"",__' - .r
(_.;_ ~ .,::; ...,' ._",_'~ ..' _ . .' ",;.;..-:_' ')C;. -.:,
)_~_<...., r.:, ",":,-" ~....:....\~"_ ~', :-;-:,<". ..v"..' ."..._;:;:cG<.:"
... ~.t,t ....<;"1>, "'^ .~.. " .,' .. 1" ." ~ ... ....-
..., .', "-'0',,-,__,,,;:-:.';'5"> ,.' ...~~..-~: -...,/
.' .' _'. . ~ ..... .<>,' < ,," . ,,::"'!~i'.:"' '-.' ~'~
. " . .. ,..' .~ . .' ."' ,.....,~
.......,....- -.' :,~y-.,-::<." .;, . ,'..--..;
<. .<,0--:' ;'. ~.~~
Seepage of leachate (black) can be seen through a weak spot in the
cover.
.
16C4
DIVISION
OF
STATE OF FLORIDA
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
CHARLIE CRIST
Gave rnor
W. CRAIG FUGATE
Director
HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
PRE-AWARD COST REQUEST FORM
To request Pre-Award Costs, please complete this form and submit with your HMGP application. All ELIGIBLE
pre-award costs are subject to an approved grant award and availability of funding. If funding is not available or the
project is not approved, pre-award costs will NOT be reimbursed and will be solely the responsibility of the
applicant. If your project is approved and pre-award costs are eligible, the cost share for the reimbursement of these
activities is 75/25 (same as other projects).
Disaster:
Tropical Storm Fay
Name of Applicant:
Collier County Solid Waste Management Department
Project Title:
Collier County Landfill Leachate Six inch HOPE pipe
Start Date for Pre-Award Activities:
Pre-award costs associated with this request incurred prior to the date of declaration are NOT eligible. These
costs include: study or research to plan proje(.t, engineering, modeling, permitting or environmental study. These
costs must be reflected as a line item in the project budget. Construction costs should NOT be included.
Construction activities may NOT begin until afier a contract has been fillly executed with the State for this
project.
Activity Estimated Cost Estimated Start Date
Proj ect & Grant Management, ] 25 Hours x $39 hour - $4,875 lOll /08
Proiect ManaQer
Project & Grant Management, 125 Hours x $36 hour - $4,500 2/2/09
RecyclinQ Specialist
Project & Grant Management, 35 hours x $34 hour -- $1,190 1011/08
Environmental Soecialist
Grant Management, Manager Waste ] 5 hours x $48.46 - $726.90 2/2/09
Reduction and RecvclinQ
Solid Waste Operations Manager 10 hours x $4529 - $452.90 10/]/08
Total Pre-Award Request $1 ],744.80
Point of Contact Information:
Name:
David Jaye
Title: Recycling Specialist
Agency:
Solid Waste Management Department
1101 T:'imi~mi Tr::lll F Rllilcling H Vd Floor
Naples, FL 341 ] 2
Address:
Phone:
239-252-7620
Email: davidjaye@colliergov.net
Authorized Applicant Agent:
Name:
Donna Fiala
Title: Chairman, Collier County Board of Commissioners
Signature:
Date:
FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFICE
36 Skyline Drive
lake Mary, FL 32746-6201
. DIVISION HEADQUARTERS.
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Fl 32399-2100
Tel: 850-413-9969 . Fax: 850-488-1016
www.FloridaDisaster.ora
STATE LOGISTICS RESPONSE CENTER
2702 Directors Row
Orlando, Fl 32809-5631