Backup Documents 05/12/2009 Item #16B 8
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 16 B 8
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE
(Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. Original documents should be hand delivered to the Board Office. The
completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the Board Office only after the Board has taken action on
the item.)
ROUTING SLIP
Complete routing lines #1 through #4 as appropriate for additional signatures, dates, and/or information needed. If the document is
already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature, draw a line through routing lines # I through #4, complete the
checklist, and forward to Sue Filson (line #5).
Route to Addressee(s} Office Initials Date
(List in routing order)
I.
2.
3.
4.
5. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners
6. Minutes and Records Clerk of Courts Office
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
(The primary contact is the holder of the original document pcnding Bee approval. Normally the primary contact is thc pcrson who created/prepared the executIve
summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one ofthc addressees above. including Sue Filson. need to contact staff for additional or missing
information. All original documents nceding the Bec Chairman's signature arc to be delivered to the Bee oflice only after the BCe has acted to approve the
item.
Name of Primary Staff Brandy Otero Phone Number 252-5859
Contact
Agenda Date Item was 5/12/09 Agenda Item Number 16B8
A roved b the BCC
Type of Document Transmittal Letter Number of Original I
Attached Documents Attached
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Initial the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not Applicable column, whichever is Yes N/A (Not
appropriate. (Initial) Applicable)
1. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be
signed by the Chairman, with the exception of most letters, must be reviewed and signed
by the Office of the County Attorney. This includes signature pages from ordinances, ~fW(
resolutions, etc. signed by the County Attorney's Office and signature pages from
contracts, agreements, etc. that have been fully executed by all parties except the BCC ta:..;
Chairman and Clerk to the Board and possiblv State Officials.)
2. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's N--f"
Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board
3. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the tr"f
document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable.
4. "Sign here" tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's r~
signature and initials are required.
5. In most cases (some contracts are an exception), the original document and this routing slip
should be provided to Sue Filson in the BCC office within 24 hours ofBCC approval. f
Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain r
time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be ~ware of your deadlines!
6. The document was approved by the BCC on ~l'1LQ~"and all changes made during the rf\~
meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office
has reviewed the changes, if applicable.
I: Forms/ County Forms/ BCC Forms/ Original Documents Routll1g Slip
WWS Original 9.03.04
--~_._---,_.,._.......,.._,......;~
168 8
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 21, 2009
To: Brandy Otero, Operations Analyst
Trans/Stormwater Management
From: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
Minutes & Records Department
Re: Letter submitting grant application to FDEP
Attached you will find one (1) original document, referenced above, (Agenda
Item #16B8), which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on
Tuesday, May 12, 2009.
After forwarding to the appropriate party for signatures, please return a fully
executed original to the Minutes and Records Department so it may be kept as
part of the Board's permanent record.
If you have any questions, please call me at 252-7240.
Thank you.
Attachment
^~_,_-_"",,_,'^'__._,..,_..~--_.,,~._'..'," -,_._..._~._~.__...~~_._._~"--_..~.~.~,~-~-~~---'~~"...~.,~~..~"~.~-"".~_.,",.~",-,--_.~._'.,-,""-"'-''''""'"~~._-~-=~._.'-
168 8
?/3oan/ ol)~ol;'(/}I ~OflH~1f ~/ffl~/}WJt6
3301 East Tamlaml Trail. Naples, Florida 34112 - 4917
(239) 252-8097 . Fax (239) 252-3602
Donna Fiala
District 1
Frank Halas May 12, 2009
District 2
Tom Henning
District 3 Ms. Holly Powless
Fred W. Coyle
District 4 Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Jim Coletta NPS Management Section
District 5 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3570
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
Re: Section Grant Program
Dear Ms. Powless
On behalf of Collier County, I am pleased to submit the enclosed grant application (three
paper copies and one electronic version) to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, NPS Management Section for the Section 319 Grant Program.
If the Collier County Griffin Road Stormwater Improvement project is selected for
funding, Collier County is committed to fulfilling all commitments made in the grant
application, including provision of the local match.
We look forward to working with you on this very important project for Collier County.
Sincerely,
If~, j
d~
Donna Fiala
Chairman
, ,'. '~:...,
.".....- .... "-'''''''-''...,~ ~''''''''-'"--- , ,"'-'~,---_.._......-" --
168 1"S
FY 2010 SECTION 319 GRANT PROPOSAL APPLICATION
PROJECT: GRIFFIN ROAD STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PROJECT FUNDING: $721,737 FY10319 $481,158 Match
LEAD ORGANIZATION: Collier County Transportation Department, Stormwater Management
CONTACT PERSON: Brandy Otero, Operation's Analyst
(Name, Address, Phone)
COOP ERA TING ORGANIZATIONS:
Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Friends of Rookery Bay, South Florida Water
Management District Big Cypress Basin Board, Griffin Road Homeowner's Association.
PROJECT ABSTRACT:
The Proposed Griffin Road Stormwater Improvement Project is located near the southwestern
terminus of Griffin Road in the East Naples area of Collier County off of US41 Tamiami Trail and
Barefoot Williams Road. The project will be constructed on Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve property, The focus of the project is to provide water quality treatment facilities
and an adequate stormwater outfall for the area. The project will include improvements to a system
of ditches and a small canal which are currently discharging without water quantity and quality
discharge controls. These facilities will serve older established neighborhoods that were
constructed prior to the current water management regulatory controls and associated best
management practices. The project is a collaborative effort between Rookery Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve, South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin,
Friends of Rookery Bay, Griffin Road Homeowner's Association and Collier County.
Collier County will be playing the lead role in the project by providing project management and
commissioning the design and permitting services for the project. Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve will be providing the land and will also be providing ecology consulting services
for the project. An easement for the property will be provided to Collier County allowing the
proposed land use. South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin will be providing
technical and permitting support and the Griffin Road Homeowner's Association and Friends of
Rookery Bay will be providing support and stakeholder input.
Currently, the outfall for the drainage basin served by the proposed project consists of a system of
ditches and swales constructed to drain the area with no accommodation for water quality
treatment or quantity discharge controls. There are few detention facilities within the drainage
basin, The existing drainage system relies on ditches and culverts that are currently maintained by
homeowner associations or Collier County. These ditches and one small canal discharge to
Rookery Bay partially as a point source discharge to Henderson Creek within Rookery Bay
National Estuarine Research Reserve. Discharge also occurs through an abandoned system of
ditches and swales on Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve property that were
previously used for agriculture and urban drainage.
The area has increasingly experienced poor drainage. The basin is largely served by septic and
on site disposal facilities. The elevated groundwater has adversely impacted the performance of
the septic systems. The area is also served by individual wells for potable water supply. Residents
1
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
~'.-._- --...........,.--,." ~',~',"'_. '"-^'."~.,,",, - --"""""-''''-''~' ,1'<1 "W"" ....".., ",.".,.",._",,-,_.,,~..",.,,~..." .. ...~ .., ..........,.-...._---
168 8
in the area are reporting that the elevated water table has created problems with the individual
potable water supply wells.
This project seeks to establish a reliable water quality treatment facility and a drainage outfall by
replacing the old system constructed prior to current water management regulations with new
facilities constructed in accordance with current design technology utilizing best management
practices and controls. The desire is to supplement the elimination of the point source discharge
with detention facilities and controlled discharge facilities.
The project is expected to result in a net benefit in water quality by constructing a lake and filter
marsh that will provide water quality treatment. Furthermore the project will entail constructing a
control structure in the form of a long broad crested weir that will control stormwater discharges to
Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. This combination of stormwater facilities will
replace the existing uncontrolled discharge to Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.
The project should also provide diverse open fresh water and marsh habitat that will be integrated
into the natural upland and estuarine transitional areas within the subject property. These habitats
will replace an abandoned farm field that has experienced an exotic vegetation species invasion.
The elimination of exotic vegetation within the project area will also be undertaken. The completed
project should provide opportunities to illustrate water quality treatment best management
practices and marsh creation as a means to control and treat discharges from older developed
areas into natural systems of national significance.
PROJECT LOCATION AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS:
The project location is depicted in the Appendix as location map and is located within the limits of
Collier County District 6 and the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Plan. As a result the project is
consistent with Section 319 funds target objectives which state that the funds will be targeted first to
watersheds with a comprehensive watershed plan. The receiving water bodies are listed as impaired by
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Coastal Rookery Bay) and EPA (Henderson
Creek) but TMDL limitations have not been established for the receiving water bodies,
The location is environmentally strategic in that the project is situated along the interface between
existing and ongoing urban development and sensitive natural lands designated as a national
research reserve. The project location is within the limits of Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve. The water treatment facilities will be located in an impacted area which was
previously used for row crop farming and is now invaded by exotic plant species, In order to
minimize impacts, the construction of the facility will be in already impacted areas and post
construction and restored habitat will include open water and wetland habitats which will result in a
net improvement to the watershed habitat.
The watershed can be generally characterized as an urban fringe to urban watershed with a variety
of land uses. The watershed contains estate sized lots of rural character with no water
management or treatment facilities. The estate size lots are used for residential habitations,
ornamental horticultural and other agricultural land uses. Much of the development within the basin
was constructed prior to the implementation of the current water management regulations. As a
result, volume discharge and water quality discharge are not managed and the design criteria did
not provide adequate drainage for the area.
Portions of the watershed contain master planned communities with and without golf course
amenities and commercial land uses that are highly impervious. Travel trailer recreation and
2
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
- - --_.~.~._._~--,._--~----_._-~._-_..-^-~-~.__.~".~~ ,," "'"-"''''''_.''~.'~ -""""~--""-'-""'-"'" "".".,,,",,..."" ~",,'~'--""'''----
8 ,
168
manufactured homes are also located in the watershed and these development areas are highly
impervious and do not contain adequate water quality and volumetric discharge attenuation
facilities. Only a small portion of the basin has been developed in accordance with current water
management regulatory controls. The following base information is provided as requested in the
grant application instructions.
Watershed Name: Collier County District 6 (or HUC - Big Cypress Swamp)
latitude: 81 43' 21"
longitude: 26 03' 06"
Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC): 03090204
land Uses within the Watershed (acres and percentages of total):
Acres %
258 46
211 37
98 17
567 100
POllUTION REDUCTION STRATEGY:
The pollution reduction strategy includes the implementation of structural and non structural best
management practices that will improve the basin water quality and quantity discharge
characteristics. The structural best management practices include the construction of 43 +/- acres
of lake and created wetlands constructed on land disturbed as part of an abandoned agricultural
land use. The lake discharge will be controlled through the construction of a multiple hundred foot
broad crested weir designed to produce sheet flow discharge at less than one foot per second
discharge velocity. Two weirs will be used to distribute stormwater to the south and north as
required to emulate historic drainage patterns. The lake and filter marsh will provide approximately
12,960,000 CF of volumetric water quality treatment.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE(S):
The project objectives are as follows.
. Eliminate a historic man made point source discharge which is responsible for lowering
water tables in the area during the dry season and promoting unnatural point source
discharges during the wet season.
. Collect untreated stormwater discharges from unregulated developments and provide for
volumetric storage and water quality treatment prior to discharge into an estuary of national
significance.
. Provide discharge controls for quantity discharges from a drainage basin that contains
limited stormwater treatment facilities.
. Provide for salt water barrier to prevent saline water intrusion into freshwater groundwater
resources.
. Provide for future opportunities to measure level of treatment and establish useful treatment
mechanisms for urban-natural system interface areas.
. Restore native habitat in an area that has been disturbed by agricultural activities in the
past and now harbors exotic vegetation and the resulting seed source for further exotic
vegetation proliferation.
3
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
,,,,",,,'~-- - "t-___,. , ~'" "'....u ... ......, '~."'u.~~ If" ...- . -.'--
168 8
.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project consists of a 43 +/- acre lake and created marsh that will provide water quality
treatment and volumetric storage for the drainage basin identified in the attached exhibits. The
project also includes improvements to existing ditches that will feed the lake and filter marsh with
stormwater discharges for the drainage basin. The project includes a public input process during
design and public education component and urban runoff management and control plan. Water
quality monitoring programs consistent with South Florida Water Management District permit
requirements will be implemented and data will be maintained for future use in implementing the
design of future projects.
ESTIMATED POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION:
BMPs Installed Other Other
TSS TP TN Sediment BOD kalvr kg/yr
Lake/Filt Marsh kglyr kg/yr kglyr kglyr kg/yr
III Pre-Project 430.2 2134 40.7 7520
'tl
ell
0 Post-Project 111.2 1223 5.86 2153
..J
....
c: load
.l!I 319 911 34.9 5366
.3 Reduction
'0
a.. % Reduction 74.1 42.7 85.7 71.4
Sediment Other Other
TOTAL TSS TP TN BOD kalvr kg/yr
kg/yr kglyr kglyr kglyr kg/yr
III Pre-Project 430.2 2134 40.7 7520
'tl
III
0 Post-Project 111.2 1223 5.86 2153
..J
....
c: load
.l!I 319 911 34.9 5366
.3 Reduction
'0
a.. % Reduction 74.1 42.7 85,7 71.4
MODEL USED: Harvey Harper for Phosphate and Nitrogen and STEPL for Sediment and
Biological Oxygen Demand. See Appendix C for both calculation spreadsheets.
LAND OWNERSHIP STATUS: Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection will be granting a drainage easement for proposed
activities as part of the project. An application for a drainage easement is currently being prepared.
A letter from the land management agency recommending approval of the drainage easement is
shown in the Appendix C.
4
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
.- ' --... , V J"~. ._--"- --,.
168 8
OUTPUTS/DELlVERABLES: The ultimate goal of the project is to design, permit, and construct
the Filter Marsh as outlined in the descriptions above. The following is a description of the tasks
needed to accomplish the goal.
Task 1 - Construction Plans and Permitting: This project is currently being designed and
permitted. Necessary permits will be obtained prior to construction. Consultant engineering and
inspection services will be required during construction to ensure that construction plans and
specifications are followed.
Task 2 - Public Involvement: A minimum of two public information meetings will be conducted to
inform the public and solicit comments from residents in the area. The second meeting presenting
the near completion design will be used to educate the public in storm water best management
practices.
Task 3 - Construction: Construction of the Griffin Road Area Stormwater Improvement Project will
begin after all necessary permits have been received. Collier County and Rookery Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve will provide project management and inspection to ensure that
improvements are built in accordance with the plans.
Task 4 - Monitoring: Water quality monitoring will be provided in order to demonstrate the project
benefits. A preliminary Monitoring plan has been included in this proposal as Appendix A. A
detailed water quality monitoring plan will be submitted for review within three months of the grant
award.
Task 5 - Project Administration: Collier County will be responsible for contractor selection. Collier
County and Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve will be responsible for contract
development and administration and construction inspection. Collier County staff will be
responsible for financial accounting and grant reporting to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, including the required regular progress reports, draft project report, comprehensive final
proje~t report, and annual effectiveness monitoring reports.
5
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
,.,,,.,,--~ ----,-,,-- ....4. __..."'...._.w"_,_,___,..,,,._'__...I>WR.-WI .l>. L". "";_"'.""''''''''_''''''"'''''_.. T .. - _...",-~~ - -,,-
168 ~8
PROJECT MILESTONES:
Task Activity Start ComDlete
1 Grant Application I Project Setuo Month 1
2 Survey and Proiect Data Collection Month 2 Month 4
3 Civil Enaineerina Desian Month 2 Month 4
4 Construction Plans I Documents Month 3 Month 5
5 Permitting Month 6 Month16
6 Grant Award Month 16 Month 16
7 Construction Month 17 Month 25
PROJECT BUDGET:
Project Funding Activity 319 (h) Amount Matching Match Source 1<
Contribution
Staff $46,895 Collier County*
Travel
Equipment
Supplies
Contractual $60,420 $39,580 Collier County*
BMP Implementation $661,317 $338,683 Collier Countv*
Monitoring $36,000 Collier County*
Public Education $20,000 Collier County*
Other:
Total: $721,737 $481, 158
Total Project Cost: $1,202,895
Percentage Match: 40
*If a stormwater utility or other dedicated recurring fee is contributing, put that information
in the following table.
MATCH SOURCE INFORMATION:
Match Source Name DescriDtion ERUlFee
Collier County. Dedicated millage from Ad Valorem taxes .15 mils
for stormwater manaaement
6
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
",,,----"''''.....,.,...........''',,'..,, ~ ~1lI __n_. """,-,*,-,-~.~."".- "_.,.~;_.."~"'","'~-"...~----_.~-~,.."..""._"..,-,,,,."~~._'---_--..,..~- --
169 8
BUDGET BY TASK:
Project Funding Activity 319 (h) Amount Matching Match Source
Contribution
Task 1 - Construction $60,420 $39,580 Collier County
Plans and Permitting
Task 2 - Public $20,000 Collier County
Involvement
Task 3 - Construction $661,317 $338,683 Collier County
Task 4 - Monitoring $36,000 Collier County
Task 5 - Project $46,895 Collier County
Administration
Total: $721,737 $481,158
Total Project Cost: $1,202,895
Percentage Match: 40
OTHER FUNDING (Not Match - such as land acquisition or other federal grants):
Amount
$197,620
$150,500
$360,000
Total: $708,120
OTHER INFORMATION: If this is a multi-year project, have you requested sufficient funds to
complete the project (assuming funds requested herein are provided)?
(State yes or no, and, if no, provide an explanation): Yes: ~ No: 0
The Lead Organization, as listed on the first page of this form, agrees to comply with all
requirements specified in the guidance package and in the federal grant regulations.
Checking "no" or "yes, except" will cause the project to have a lower ranking than similar
projects by lead organizations that agree to the requirements:
Yes:~ No: 0 Yes, except: 0 (Note: list exceptions below.)
Exceptions:
REFERENCES CITED:
NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL APPENDICES IN A SEPARATE WORD DOCUMENT. THIS
MAY INCLUDE MAPS. FIGURES OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO
INCLUDE WITH YOUR APPLICATION
7
Collier County Section 319 Grant Proposal Application
_.~._,._----,,_._~.~--~-~-- _~..,_u_"~~~~_",.,~. .v .. ".__.;_~" ..----"~,--..~,~........'"-;....."~"""""""~--.,_._~"..,~., -'," -, ."',,,
, :'8 8
APPENDIX A: MONITORING PLAN ,
:~
Draft Water Quality Monitoring Plan
For
Griffin Road Area Stormwater Improvement Project
BMP Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure for
lake and Filter Marsh:
Sampling Locations: inflow and outflow
Frequency of Monitoring: seven to ten storm events
Storm Events: Discrete rainfall events of generally greater than 1.0 inches and less than 3.0 inches.
Daily rainfall (to nearest 0,01 inch) measured at the project location with verification
from the local weather station. Rainfall data should be provided for at least the week
proceeding monitoring and day(s) of monitoring.
Flow Measurements: Flow is measured at each point source inflow to the lake using calibrated flow
activated flow meters.
Parameters to be Monitored:
Parameter Detection Limit Method
Total Cadmium 1 ug/l Composite*
Total Chromium 5 ug/l Composite*
Total Copper 5 ug/l Composite*
Total Zinc 10 ug/l Composite*
N02+N03 0.1mg/l Composite*
TNK 0.3 mg/l Composite*
Total Ammonia or
Total N 0.05 mg/l Composite*
Total Phosphorus 0.05 mg/l Composite*
Ortho Phosphate 0.05 mg/l Composite*
TSS 1 mg/l Composite*
Oil/Grease 1 mg/l Composite*
Fecal coliform N/A Grab if Possible**
*Flow weighted composite samples will be taken over the storm hydrograph at each point source inflow
location and at multiple locations across the outfall spreader weir. Typically the samples will be
composited over the inflow hydrograph at the inflow and for up to a 36 hour period at the outflow
station. Rainfall that does not result in at least a six-hour discharge from the stormwater BMP shall not
be considered a completed monitoring event. Each composite will include at least six evenly distributed
sub-samples.
**Grab samples to be collected within the drainage area time of concentration at influent and effluent
stations described above.
.
".".._-"".,,,"'"''''.....'-'''''''''..'''-- -.".',."..._-".,,~.=,,""'" .- """'~','e"'" -.-,_.=~-"',_.... II ..H_""_.....'..,,,.,"."""'","'.,._"'''';,~._'''''....~.,...>"
,.".",'----"'.----
. .
. .,
. ~ ' .
~. UlI:)I~"rl:': ~ .1~1!~-iit:" "'i:'''''' a~. III" '~I
r' . ~t' ,1., f t",',' '>, > ... I :-:-~-";' '.'!'
. /'"', . I~r ........'" . 1.::.'_"_____-4-. ~~ '.. ..
,r -- ~ 'X 4, , ~ ~ . m f . ~'. '.
~ ' I (""'" t~ ,--,..,_,"'lJ ",' ~" >""'-:;::;; ~ , --,'---:-'''~I
If' " -": to> ~~l I ~ _--;..l._"~""~" "~::.:"'" ...'
',-...;, \ f: J. T' .".) t r., I : ><t \~~. \\'~'\iL---"""", +-'-,-A~"
;. ~ ~ ' ", j. : -',Tj 1 I .1.__ - i.......-" --:~ '!> \\. .~1. \ ..J ., T ,'. . .
~ ,*,,"'No.\~tt,., .. I I l~,"'T. 1= ~'~ihlD.,l~~rr='.~ ._~,
~.:,. .".,;4\ ~!. "v;;y I j' ~L II ~..r::,1' 1 l' I ii m., . ......:., ~.....-:r. '.. I
''f -'-;;' I, [:!I . ~fJ ~ . ~. ...I' I
." - z 'r-t"""'I ~ ~ ~rn d\t. ....1
f , -~-;'"-:I: !ft." ~ 1'1 ~ :~"'" -- ....... .~-oJ '*!!J:f~~~ .. ".:~ 0 .
~ r~~:1f~~ f~ ;'~~"~IllS~~ij~l~ N~~:~;-~ ~ ' ,~'.~ 1:
i~:, ..~.~ c, lit. itG\i. . ;t~~ ....II) "-/~..... ...., ~I "
, .<~) ~. =,r.;' ill " ~.! :J ( t. . .
>Jil. -': "",1, t" O-~. "~L} 11.' '..l..,..;;::J ~-'. h...".. _-
~ - 'f;' ij t'~~~. ", ~;;..,~~~J'( 'J'r..J'<'t'j~a~['\ \-c:'t-c:::3~;rcI'f~""\:'''!~'' trl "'/ I
tt . I \ Al:.. "I'.' 1 j l' ~ ; ,A.;, (j (""<t "': 1 1 {
.. '/;. J 1; I '.', I 1/ :II! , ~., '-) .
:~:"; (1- :~~~1:-1~~~.t::;;! 15J~1~, ;tl.~"~. -i: ~r>' it' J{~ ....;}\~
~ . ;U. .~."~ -...1 ,...."..L-"4 t ...~J I ~ ; -.. I <! :- \. ~ ~~.,
~. 1\-.1_ 'r...I.-........,..._I'__' 't.f <,t.\. ..,.... .....'_~/"'.. k"fli\
A.,..::""^ I b'~: ~ ~i ....-1<"'< J JJ ~1 ~t: ~Oo( Zit ,~ \-~~ ~ .;"i "'<V
. ., f . '.T .,.;:1:,.. .. AV~ ,I I' rill. .~ , \ .
...;:...... '~",;,'I-~: I :.}>jH1~"~:2":"' . :O:J:< i Ill.....,..).. >,-art' ". I /;)... ,~.
"-:,,:,1".l'o "l'\6!E''' 1-12 , -')A',' ,111nr .t(.," ~'(1 "'tn. ..... i . .
, J" w 1 J ~ 'I '> 1 " ~ ,\ t:.;! '..' I. '~,. I l.
... .l:t \>.-(:::i I ,.. I " '; ,r I ~," I, 1. <1 ( 0 ., \}1 \. ~ .. ~
'1......H:::~_... .'~..,.-f '~"'i~_'; ;.~(I/,.: "".~ n:: ,:~~.! ' .f t '-, ___~
"'.... "'{"'l'~ 'ft r'; 110.' f'~' lif,;, 'Z "...Ji. ". . ) i ..~.
-, ._'..1,":' ..,7"':h"i : i., ,~,' ,"--, - r l '"l, ,\i ".! n:: ~::~II.. "
<<-:r i f;-!1 '''';f.iIJ'~, t'il' f~ f ,1'/ Jr \ ~.- .. 'r .; f, ..
f"t f' ,.. it. ,-:~~ '1~~) ,- -- '~'~1 {--::..\ ""; lt, i I \
, . I, h'" . I' ~ -,.J.......~ - +-
:t;;"T .' ; (.. ,L '.". , f ~ l..tl .. , i""""""," "
., , ~" ;i\ .:tr .- ;, ;: ":\( . t'. N." rr~~' I ,."""... '. i.1!, .... ~'.'...1:1...
\ ~,n , , . j, _ I ( ,I " ,j, -- i\'" If..,
~ ~.... _m,,:-~"'- ,,/ ~. 1'l-1'>.J ","" ..J i:~~ '~:~ 1. ~~,,":;1l''''''_ J,
:rr'. ". 4 ",)It:. , ]....... "".' ), It.n.~ 1,... t~ t, j I \1;. ~}j --, .. ~., ."~'>'''.'.''';I " ;.;..!'f~.
"i~~~~.,. /";:':''i '''1.''=,' 1';' :,A ~'7'~' ; :-...... <r1 . '.. '!:'l [;:"
'r..... {hJ'-], ,,'t-~-'>\" ~:;~"l >(,~ (~c:t: I~. .. 1\, .......-....,_ ,;h / r-
;, , >- ..-mo~$PfI~ ~ t.: 'my-rUE~tf" E~ROJ' -'~ ' . .' , '
..~<~ ~ ~h., ,!,,', "" J)"',.. ",l!~j . ...'^ 1 "'I'~ f1 .. ~.
.~ .'" '.....-. ,. . 'c ."'- .... ',.... '" ,., ,.. n ,." ,) . ....... \'
<I, ,..;f l~'" , ''',~ .... '>-, ,.....1"h.,.,,-:;-,..,i. 1,. ~";t ; '"
"", "S 'l(C' ", '. .. i.' f' }' I ".,.l
.. ';'':? :~::;~ ),hl>" )/' . . f,.. . '
. 1..... "1.0 J".L.,;J-. c.. : " .'
,< ''''' ll> ~ .
\ ., 1" ,~. c... ""It'...A.
,# '..:'~I ;J/I'~ ..... /:'t:, 0( "'" '" .." ,~...
~. \ 1",... "r.,'/,/ ,>/1 ,,:..,'\,. ~ r" t. ~""~~
.. ~. ' " .)' ~..._ ~ J\ _.........._., ~
< I .- '( l:/ --:r.... *", ~'''''''I 1'" "_ ;. a... ..-I, ../" ~ ""
ijf!. 'i ..( "' ... ""'/fi-\.~,r....._)o( .c: :Jj r~,,;" ,.... ~ ~
". . , , ...." . '~~.,</"-;'-'" '. ,(-<'.. ',"'~ -~{~'......' "
..., r' ~ L....,,, x.,.."".' '" . .. ","
· "~I , . ' " - -" . "',' :'.1 .,. . "\ ,. I r
k~y,,>: ~ f ~.J f \ ; I
) "~"~ ,~,," ..... , ,
(p,\ . (i"~ y'i (') f ".' i J
" :/ ()",>r~~~,~:' ,.t:)i;' , '. .~ f .
,,~f\.. J^
. 't ~.~.;K~~;: '" ~'.' .' ;~~".. / ' ,~,~
. ' '~,' I
'J'.,:':. ". r'"'' . " ~ < X,
I' '<eliii('" ... ". ,<=,~;,..:;, '~1 "
,- , ,""
(f~\. ""'. j ,F....
. . . ,. .'. "'"'.. "J\:;:-~
.~.' ..,....~,_.: ~'":""r~-:~.
. ' . ,;- "I. . I! ..:..,.
. :.;~, (;':~.~:""j , I
, .\.. ....., ,.~.'~ . ". If
,.~".c,. ii1 l.'l
\ r,.. ," .. ". .~ I J'" ,"il.-":~" . I~
.t,., .,.rl t ....
~ '+-~~, '."4'-~''''-'-~'-~''' r~ , ,: .
"'"~..,, " ... "........~--i ~~, " . f
, "if~ ...... _,..~1
. A: .,'f' ""t~- ...."T""p.'f_.._. I
.~,,"\"";':<J":-{'l.:: ".~ k.~"=:~" '. __ .
.
.
.
''JA
--., ~
....e .' ,. . ......> .1 ' .~
. -' ''', ~.' , '" .~ . '
.....' p"..~ \. }l' I
i' 'MY R!II II. . ~ "".' . ..... ~. '.
r-~"~- \ "--'."" ,',. ~;.,:~'~./ "" . .
,..." Jil I.' .''''It''', . ..... ':to, " ..I
~'.l. ~... 4., "~"''':':-'~: :;:'1 ,~:;.~'~
. .. 1.: '10,;.''''' ,,'';:'/1.'' ~ ~ ~ ~
~/~i?~:5'0.
, ': - z~,1/.;
". ': ~;,. ~:.;r~"'''' t'~
:: ", " . <<:'.
_ 4'"" ~ '
.' . f '*....-
~ , ;~.'o ,r" '..:...::::_.........~
~~. '.... . \'t'
-' ,..~!:. ~" ". ~,\~
\Mt~~~ u~~ ",' .... ~~1
~1tJ ..~. _' ~~
MI'.:H/.t 1~"IH':~".'~ ,...;;,. ~ *
e~~,; .";' ~ ':
'. \ ..~' ".... .' Y. .. I "',' /
'~ ~" , -;'~>1/(Ii"~"',~' - ,1
", . '" !"Ii ~.. l{
$'/ .. ~ ~ ~"... I ~Jit/ . . I ,...'1' 4 \
]' 'd;~ t ~ '"..,::,'41, .j /i" ~.... ~~,~.. -:
',,,. ;,,~,.'. ',., ,. I I , ".:i.,'. \
, . ','","'" ," . J' ..
,'. ' ".,'~'~. '.... It..' .... ' if., "," .t. __'-
.,~.:t~~:V "',.,~" .' ". , \ .; '\\ .~,,~^
,. ',d.',,' -....; , " ~
s;' " , .' .) "
,,<"' "'-<'.' ',I l..:..
,,)""'. ~
') ."1,'.,
~ .~. /
~. ~,
, ';'. '..
~. "t ..,.
; ':';'/ ..P,
.. " k" .411...
. ""it' .<~,
,'1 ,{ >. "
" .. '... "..,.",,' ',-
I .. .. '.' "-
"' ,. . l8:
'1.. <'-.:
17-:-:~ ^ ~ .......... :...
~ t';>, \f
, .;"' '" , ..
~!.' ... ..' <E!::3 ,."
t. "
t 1;,
K.'.'>O;......... '.
j,....;' ,:': ..
I .
J \
.'
:.:;' #~
.~..j...'_._.'.....
", .: -, '.
,. ',' ~..
--_~_-:"-___.J:~~
;
I
-
. .
. .
I"
:'1'
".~,...l;f 'l'-
f: ., .... '
, . .
~ . f'l i
Y ~~,,,
;I,.~,P p'<lcf~ ~ ~
.....~.... ..... .J,.~_
.. (J
. .
't"
'.
~."
,.... ~ ~ f ,.
~ " t
" .1
110'
'~ MARSH
~"'1 INETLANDS
. I
'''~', ,..
GH1! f '~-.l P., "
m::E P __t_.
,. WATER
LAk,E
25 ac.
,. ;1'
r '} ,(f
II ~
,', :~~
?~.;~~~~~:.;";:::.:; ,:~:,..;: :";..
'. ~
>( ""
,
~J
.
. ..' I{
, 'I"~.~..' .~
I
.
II
-
APPENDIX C: OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION 168 8
Cost Estimate for Construction Project
D'XTAINC
{, () " , . ,
, ,
..&.. '" , ,~ .....
Pbnninn Ciyil Engirll't'rinn
Slln~ing & "l.lpping ::-
SECTION 319 COST ESTIMATE GRIFFIN ROAD FILTER MARSH
03-12-2009 by JJS
Description arv U/M Unit Price Cost
Genera I/Startu pIE ntrance 1 lS $25,000.00 $25,000
Excavation 371,066 CY $2.20 $816,345
Plantings/Wetland marsh 18 AC $5,000.00 $90,000
Final seed/Mulch/Stabilization - 24,000 SY $2.00 $48,000
Clearing/Grubbing 40 AC $2,000.00 $80,000
Silt fence/Erosion control 7,000 LF $1.50 $10,500
Concrete mat weir 60 LF $700.00 $42,000
Access Road 140,000 SF $1.00 $140,000
$1,251,845
Contingency 10% $125,185
Sale of Excavated Material (Credit) 371,066 CY $1.10 ($408,173)
Total $968,857
Assumes
Cost based on drawing from county labeled "MCB-13 Stormwater Treatment Area Conceptual Master Plan"
On-site stockpiling
20 ft width limerock access road around entire lake
50 ft of weir
Entire marsh area 18 ac replanted
Excavation in 18 ac marsh to 3 feet deep
Excavation in 22 ac lake to 6 foot min depth from control elev. (est. 8 feet of cut)
seeding and mulch 30 ft width around project
No blasting
Does NOT Include
Exotic removal
Water quality monitoring
Permitting fees and consultant fees
Wildlife relocations
Fencing
168 8
Harvey Harper Water Quality Calculations
O'lTA1NC. Pr~ject : Grimn Road Outfall
Planning Proj, # : 080105.00.00
Visualization Calculated By : JAZ Date: 19-May-09
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
~~, ,...... .A Surveying & Mapping Checked By : JJS Date: J9-Ma)'-09
Griffin Road Outfall
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development Analysis
Content
- Assumptions
- Pre - development Load Analysis
- Post - development Load Analysis
- Storm Treatment
- Recommendations
- Land Use Summary
- Lake Volume
S:\2008\080105,OO.IXl Grillin R<1ad Outfall',oms 1'U\';r<1nm<lIlaI Res,,"rce P<nnil ^pp'II."CI Horpcr'200'l-05-19 HarH'l Harper WIlI<r QuulitlRE VO 1"ls 5i19'21l1l'l
Contem 1 ors 8:57PM
.
^,"'''', "'---""'~'".~..._,-," _',""""..._.,,.."h""._",x. .^"'.._'"".__.,.,_.,.........._.." "'" "'''''_'''',_...,_.>''T'. ,.,".~,."""",.;._----~
/IPBB
Di\XZA'NC.
Planning
. Visualization
CON S lJ L TIN C; Civil Engineering
..... '-, , .L .... Surveying & Mapping
Proj~cl :
Proj. # :
Calculated By :
Chcckt:d By :
Griffin Road Outfall
080105.00.00
Dale: 19.May.09
Dale: 19.Mav.09
.
.JAZ
.JJS
Griffin Road Outfall
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development Analysis
Assumntions
J. The total Project Area will consist of 42.6 acres.
2. The total Drainage Area will consist of 567 acres for which the water management system will be
constructed.
3. Calculations based on the June 2007 Evaluation of Current Storm water Design Criteria within the State of
Florida.
~; :1}(lK'0801US.llll.OO (jrin1n Rood OUllidl\tl0081nvir\l1ll1lt'lllul Resuurce I'cnnfl App\HlIf\c~ HI!.rpl:r200Q.U5-1lJ II;\I"\;:) Ilal'J'l<:r Water C)UUlilyIU'YU1.xls
Assumptiuos 2ufK
5/19121109
R:.'i7P\1
168 8
D\lTAJNl". Project: Grirfin ROlId Outfall
Planning PrQi. #: 080105.00.00
Visualization Calculated By : JAZ Dale: I9-Ma~..o9
CON S l ' L TIN G Civil Engint.'Cring Checked By : JJS Dale: I9-M.~..o9
~ .... , ,~ ..... Surveying & Mapping
Griffin Road Outfall
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development Analysis
Pre-development Characteristics
Land Use Summarv
Land Use Category Area Conditions
acres
Single-Family Residential 257.7 N/A
Low-Density Residential 210.8 N/A
OpenlUndeveloped 98.5 Good
567.0
Ground Cover I Soil Tvpe
Ground Cover HSG
Single-Family Residential D
Low-Densit)' Residential D
OpenlUndeveloped CoD
Curve Number I RunorrCoefficient
Land Use Category non. DeIA CN C Value
From TR* 55, Table 2-2 From Appendix C:
Zone 4
Single-Family Residential (70% Impervious Cover) (HSG D) 92 0.676
Low-Density Residential (30% Impervious Area) (HSG D) 86 0.386
OpenlUndeveloped (Woods) (Fair Condition) (HSG CoD) 76 0.103
· TR= Technical Release
s. '2008.080 IOHtO.OO Grimn RDaki Outrul1'OOOS EU\'ironmenUlI RtsflUlct: I'ermil App'lltJrvl")' Ilarper :!l)()l')...o~..19 lIaf'\'"1o IInrJ'lt'r WIlIt,."f l."'lnht~ RlVO! '\;1.'. ~, 19]OOQ
Pr\.~elp loed Anal}"sis J of8 S'!j7 PM
.
'd...,................____.. -, "n_-'.'''"U.,,, < ,.,<,'___.,,"'"'....~ . .t__"'_,~,~"""'...._..,~'"..,..."~...,.,"";"......._;;_,,."""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,~,,>,,_,,,,,,___"'_'_""'_'.,_,,,,~ ~'''.'''~,",",."",---
/I,Bt
D\lZA'NC.
PI.Ulninf!
. . VisualizatlOll
CONSlJl.r['ING Civil Engineerin,g
..&.. ..... ., , ..... .... SurvcvinlZ & ~aonin1!
AnDual RUDOrrVolumes
Project:
Pn~i. #:
Calculated By :
Checked By :
Griffin Road Outfall
080105.00.00
JAZ
JJS
Dale: 19-May-09
Date: 19-Ma~.-09
Annual RunoffYol.
Annual Rainfall (inlyr). Area (ac) 1/1 C Value'" (1 ft/12in)
Land Use Cate20rv
Annual Rainfall Depth
(inches/year) From Appendix A.3
Area
c Value
Runoff
acre-ftlyr
3(:res
Single-Family Residential
Low-Density Residential
Open/lJndeveloped
53.00
53.00
53.00
257.7
210.8
98.5
0.676
0.386
0.103
769.4
359.4
44.8
RunoffCbaracteristi(s
Land Use Category
Total Nitrogen (TN)
mgn
Total Phosphorus (TP)
mg/I
Sjngle~Family Residential
Low-Density Residential
OpenlUndeveloped
1.43
1.61
1.15
0.361
0.19\
0.055
From Table 4-5.a
From Table 4-17
From Table 4-17
Pre-develooment La.diD!!s of TN & TP
IN load (kglyr) ~ RunolT(ac-tVyr) * 43.560 ft^1/ac * 7.48 gaVft^3 * 3.785 liter/gal * TN (mg/I) * 10^-6 (kglmg)
TP load (kglyr) ~ RunolT(ac-tVyr)' 43.560 ft^2/ac . 7.48 gaJlft^3 * 3.785 liter/gal * TP (mg/I) * 10^-6 (kg/mg)
Land Use Cate20ry
Runoff Total Load
Acre-tVyr kglyr
TN TP
769.4 1.356.9 342.5
359.4 713.6 84.7
44,8 63,6 3.0
1,173.6 2,134.0 430.2
Single-Family Residential
Low~Density Residential
OpenllJndeveloped
Total
S ~OO8 (lXIJIO~ 00,00 Grilli" Road OlllfalHHlO8 Enm,"lll1COlIIl R~'ur<<, I'crmn '\1'1' IJ"".~. Ilw1"'" ~(KI'J-O<.19 Ilalu", lla.'pcr WaI.... r;lloaJnvRI:VOI ,"
l'fo.,~~!'l..! ..,_,j i\naly... 1,,18
~ 1'1 }0I1'!
8 5~ I'M
168 8
D\lTA1NC. Project : Griffin Road Outfall
Planning Proj, # : 080]05.00.00
ViSlIHlizution Calculated By : JAZ Date: 19-May-09
CON S U LTI NG Civil Engineering
~ ,,",. , ~ ~ Surveying & Mapping Checked By : JJS Date: 19-May-09
Griffin Road Outfall
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development Analysis
Post-develoDment Characteristics
Land Use Summarv
Land Use Category Area Conditions
acres
Single-Family Residential 257.7 N/A
Low-Density Residential 210.8 N/A
OpenlUndeveloped 55.9 Good
Lake/Filter Marsh 42.6 N/A
567.0
Ground Cover / Soil Tvpe
Ground Cover HSG
Single-Family Residentia D
Low-Density Residential D
Open/Undeveloped CoD
Lake/Filter Marsh N/A
Curve Number / Runoff Coefficient
Land Use Category non - DCJA CN C Value
From TR'" 55. Table 2-2 From Appendix
C: Zone 4
Single-Family Residential (70% Impervious Cover) (HSG D) 92 0.676
Low-Density Residential (30% Impervious Area) (HSG D) 86 0.386
Open/Undeveloped (Woods) (Fair Condition) (HSG CoD) 76 0.103
Lake/Filter Marsh N/A N/A
'" TR= Technical Release
S.\2008\OSI) I 05.00.00 Gnl1in Road Out1all'.(XXIR En\'ironm(,'utal R,,-SOUf&:C I>cnnil App\Han.cy 1-lttrpcn~{l(),)-O;.19 Uanl.~ Haf'J.'J\.'f Waler (>wdit~ REVOI.:..I!i ;/19/.20ftQ
Iln~I..&\~lp 1.oad Aratlysis 50(8 8:S7 I'M
,
"'''''''''''''~_'"----,_.,.,,,......_-,"..~-- "..^'_.,.~- '11'1>"""""_"",,,0'-" -.-...,..-."","----;.....'" ,..,..-.,*
11,68
D\X~^'NC
Planning
Visualization
CON S U LTI NCi Civil Engineering
..&. '" , ~ .A. Survt.'vint! & M<tooinl!
Project:
Proj. #:
Calculated By :
Chci;ked By :
Griffin Road Oulfall
080105.00.00
JAZ
JJS
Date: 19~Ma)-'-09
Dale: 19-May.09
Annual RunolTVolumes
Annual Runotl" Vol. ~
Annual Rainfall Oo/yr). Area (ac). C Value. (llilI2in)
Land Use eateRoO
Annual Rainfall Depth
(inches/year) From Appendix A.3
Area
acres
C Value
RunolT
acre. ftlyr
Single-Family Residential
Low-Density Residential
OpenlUndeveloped
53.00
53.00
53.00
257.7
210.8
55.9
0.676
0.386
0.103
769.4
359.4
25.4
LakelFilter Marsh
53.00
42.6
N/A
0.0
Runoff Charaderistics
Land Use Category
Total Nitrogen (TN)
mgll
Total Phosphorus (TP)
mgil
Single-Family Residential
Low-Density Residential
Open/Undeveloped
1.43
1.61
1.15
0.361
0.191
0.055
From Table 4-5.a
From Tahle4-17
From Table 4-17
LakclFilter Marsh
N/A
N/A
Pre-develooment Loadin"s of TN & TP
TN load (kglyr) ~ Runoff (ac-ftIyr) .43.560 ft^2/ac. 7.48 gal/ft^3. 3.785 liter/gal. TN (mgll). 10^-6 (kglmg)
TP load (kglyr) = Runol1"(ac-ftIyr). 43,560 ft^2/ac . 7.48 gall1\^3 . 3.785 liter/gal · TP (mgll). 10^-6 (kglmg)
LakelFilter Marsh
Total
RunolT Total Load
Acre-ftIyr kglyr
TN TP
769.4 1.356.90 342.55
359.4 713.57 84.65
25.4 36.07 1.72
0.0 0.00 0.00
1,154.2 2, 106.53 428.92
Land Use Category
Single-Family Residential
I.ow-Dcnsity Residential
Open/Undeveloped
s. ,~,~, IX"' 1\)5 IK)((l fililli" R,>ao.J OutfaIHIOOlll:n\ironm,'111111 Rc'M1UfCC I'crmil ^pp,H~f'.', Harl'cr\:'(~)O).O-,.I<J Ilan cy H;uJl<:' W,lle'" 1.1ll(llilyRr\'OI.\b
1''''t-<.!t:,dl'L.IlIlJAnaly,'' I,,,fll
5;tW~U(N
H571'M
16B 8
D'lTA'NC. Pru.if:~l : Griffin ROll" OIolfall
PI~)J1ning Proj. #; 08018!i.OO.OO
Visualizatlon Cakulaled ny' ,~ DOle; 19-:\1n-09
COr.;SULTING Civil Engin,,<,ting
..... '- , '.L .... Sun,,')'ing & Mappmg Checked By : .IJS Dote: 19-\la,'-lI9
Griffin Road Outfall
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development Analysis
Slorm Treatment I
Characteristics of Wet Detention Trntment Lakes
Lake Surface Area Mean Depth Volume Maximum Deplh
Acres ft acre- Ii It
Lake/Filter Marsh 42.6 7.5 319.5 12.0
Treatment Provided bv Lakes
Lake Delention Time (day) = Volume (acre-ft) / Annual Runoff (acre-ftlyr) *365 day/yr
TN Removal ~ 43.75 * Lake Detention Time / (4.38+ Lake Detention Time) From Figure 5-10.
TP Removal = 40.13 + 6.372 * In (Lake Detention Time) + 0.213 * (In (Lake Detention Timey2 From Figure 5.9.
Basin: Lake/Filter Marsh
Lake Detention' 101 days
Parameter Inputs Remon I Discharge
%
TN 2, 106.5 kglyr 41.9 1.223.2 kglyr
TP 428.9 kglyr 74.1 111.19 kg/yr
Runoff Volume 1.154.2 acre-ftlyr 1,154.2 acre- ftlyr
Comoare Pre- and P05I- develooment LoadiDlZ
Parameter Pre-denlopment Post-development
TN 2.134.0 kglyr 1,223.2 kglyr
TP 430.2 kglyr 111.2 kglyr
Evaluate Denth of PORd Anollla
Mean TP cone. in discharge (mg!l) Annual TP dis. (kglyr). yr/(Outtlow Vol.+ Lake Vo!.) (ac-fl)* ac'43560 W'2 * ft"3!7.48 gal * gal/3.785L * 10'"6 mg/kg
Melin Chyl-a conc. (mglm^3) = In (ehyl-a) ~ 1.058 * In (TP) - 0.934 Eq. 4 (p. 6-46)
,- e " (1.058 · In (TP) - 0.934)
Mean Seeehi Disk SD depth (m) = (24,2386 + 0.3041 · chyl-a) / (6,0632 -I- chyl-a) From Figure 6-14.
Depth of IX) (m) = 3.035 · Secchi + 0.02164 x chyl-a - 0.004979 · TP Eq. 5 (p. 6-48)
S''::OIi(lau;.,~ 00.00 OnlT,n Ruad OutflllO(ll'lS f 'l\'1J~Ld Rl'5(ourcc Pt'fm,. ..,rP Hant"> BIIfl'l."r 11),)4..(1!;_] IJ H:ti,t'\, Hupl'f \\ ~ Qu.hl\'Rt V(lI.,~I$ .~, II~ :1.(10..
\l...-rnrft',lI 7a(!l l( ~~ P\.l
.
1 . ., _"".,~.",- ...,...-.... , _'ll1 ._____~ 1"~ "","-.-
-",.,~,.... ",._"--~,.~-,~
D'"'" TA'NC'.
CON S' ~ I ~ PI!U1lling
.&. _' ,l,J.TIN(' V'Mlali"'I'"
_ ,.... " Civil El,."n
..... :-;urvc\'i:~~ring .
Manmrll!
Lake
Annual TP
Discharge
Annual Volume
Discharge
Mean TP
Concentralio
n
Lake/Filter M
arsh
kg'yr
I r 1.19
~gl
61.18
Recommend.,'
Ions
L
ac-fliYf
1154.22
~,,:~~'~,'IH~ '" fl' (~ln;n "_j 0
~ ",f.ll,loX,~(-."m,,,",,,,,,,.1 Rn<
""",I'e(n"'''\I'I',H...~..,..It.f
",,,.'nll"-<"_"
11:1I\<I'Il."""\\..,,,,
~,.~h"'RH'Jt'h
Mean Ch,'I. a
Conccntr~tion
mg/m")
]0.52
l'rojc.:l
I'rnj.lI:
('~ll.clllalcd Ih :
lhl'dlO'uH; ;
Mean
Secchi Ilisk
Depth
m
0.92
JAZ
JJS
Depth of
Anoxia
m
3.1
1'68
CrimnRoldO
0801 blfllll
Ilale . M.OO.DO
Dale: 19.\1n.09
, 19-\11\-09
Mean Depth of Lake
ft
10.3
ft
7.5
~ I').:!{IO'>
K <, P~I
STEPL Pollutant Reduction Calculations 1 68 'fa
GRIFFIN ROAD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STEPL Pollutant Reduction Calculation Section 319 Grant
.'iVi-......'~-~-----~-Jll-RtL-..,.....~~-~-.iw.c:iIiiiW__-.-...iiiliiillrtt:._' . --l'ou'riiiiii~'----- "I'..... ~} -.. -I
Thili ~ 'Ii COomJM:!o"il CII "'Pt', "''Pl./l fable, Trw- fu~ ftMf!wbIM '~I" uW"f' Inc.tlQllU'" IOINll __ l'~ nt C' fN.rr ll1f>-",~ l"lifl.~'~ Nokk", ';0""11"' ~aull ""'W:fI ,,~,,~ 'l"IlIy O><>':'lPf' In 'J\;'I"<I"
'~"P f !'.....J fie !ola. 8nd COII1l1'f ,..l.,. yOUI ~~ ',.Ioc.l~ ~ .,..rny.......... .,....", Thft..... aul.....".r.<;Ai'~ ~..~ ~;I4oA h 11lH.....ll'1..ltIlMIM~ ,,, ~.fllol> 1 .,It! iiSlf p/l'II,'"t'!l~ "":',,blfl <II
5..,2 II) Lrlle' 1.'\0 uM'~ ,n iICI'IJIfI TItlkl 1 Ib'tlI'llIl toUll ~f ofll9riwllllrll ~lIbylype llId "umDef(l! nom.lI, p.' 'fHor'h.. INI.""-" apOioH II:>crool"""," 'r'lllblf, 2
irf c'*' .....~.. tur sepr.t ~ pN.fTMkot~ 1'1 Tllide J; end rdj" M~"rd mrnllf'y Us..! ~,,~\(':j w.... fhl' ~r.tt'd r.n:1l1l'.i If' TlIb'~ ~
5.p;) Yl,JU ,...,. Ill""'.... JInd"OOII1IllllJ t~ B"'1f'J "...... II 'l'0lJ ".1"1 lNJ'" IH~.,~ .....lln~OfI 01" \I<Alf ,.,..ttorlltwt:l._ dIo..t. ,.... YfU buft(lll'" Ill... lli '0 'lo&pW~ uj1~IJJ'a' "lll"II..Llflo~
5..,4 it:, ~pec.!,,!he ,lprIH,ltetNf S.:1I tlydrQl~'(IIC"c"Cq:ISH("")(I"'''''I},,jIl~I'JlCOfIC9f'lf-..ooI I' l.tl'~:i. ,bl ".....a......h' C\.t~ r.~:~ lIl;!jt by I.lllfu~ loo~' iC 1'1 r"'blt!i
,t;) rnl."lG1y Ih,. I1Ullwnl OO'1<"""'OItlORa(n~I~' !lloo1'l'P11at!... 7 Ill'll i~l "Pftll'yl"(' lJeI'.IIilItdl8"lJ '_J< "",1',,"1101,11' ".Ihc .~t~ "'-"'~"' fnnk- 8
~~p'_.. ..:~!_I3'..tf>!!.I_~~_~~f ~p.' '~'!W!~t ",~111~!~_~_~LIu~~ ~~_f~v<.L(wl\~.!"lIII.'v:l_Lf "r'tJ (,(IiOf?l:"_~:~!$
..~~~latItn'? '., ~'c . ""Nt.-41 __I -'*"11ef.,...... p"" fit..,.... ......"',.. Gl'OUltdw..... IMd clkuleu.on
SUU (~~:.~--_.- w..lhll'_.S_I~ Ifur ~.jn[t)'''~~ t.cto....1
.~..~ :1 ~~_!~~___~
IltNltofftC....kllora
l_~ _ '_. r-OiiOTo;oo--r J
~~lM Urben C ............ ,..... I=-__~~~__>~._~_=~~_ _ :~~~~~~J
81 "__"6ti~... r.J____2___...~1 _.: __~... ')I}'~JI~.__'-""'ti ';~_.~ ,,77~i
l-~ ---"-~'iI.~'
-
c ~.r-r--.~iJ
"_ _ L " 0
,.
I_I
""
\;:;, -- ~- 1- "-.-_. ;7i'F
GRIFFIN ROAD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STEPL Pollutant Reduction Calculation Section 319 Grant
rT_~ _...._.._____...__liiI_.__. --.----,
1.1)
- N~I.. , LMof 1M _ LMof - N L.a.- , L.....- ioD_ - .... v -'iiiii-- -- __
... ... ,...... LMof 1M ... ... ., L.... .- - .......... - ---
Ih "' "' .oc "' "' I tc "'
W1 39670 5aO.5 165+1.6 ..e 23ot5 "'7387 12.
'0'" 39ti70 6805 165oU_6 896 2;),\ 5 4738 7 12. 501
a. l'
- NLMof , LMof _ LMof -
C~ llWWrI lIIIIOl LMlfClfrrl
U""'" 17
C, ."" o. O.
Patlure"fld 000 00
For", &t.t1 21.
F.._
UMr Det.nec:I O. O.
O.
G 0.00 0
StreMlbl'* 0
Gtoundw..' 0.00
10101 1 17.71 23460
"''''.'''''L........'_........ "'"--"_."'''~~'''...'''-'.'.'~'-' ,.,,,,..^~"....,,,,.,...,..,-_.,,,.,,-,","<,..~.<,...,...~,,,......,",,,------~-"""",_."--,,,,, . J7 W ."".."...,....~---~~
168 8
Recommendation Letter from Land Managing Agency
Flnrida Dcpa rtnll: IJ l of
En\ ir, H1111cntal PrOlCLl i\ in
, ,
1 , ,
-:..~~~ ~~-:.t::~~~ I'
'I. 1 :\'\ X. H I~i
I " ,... {: I 'c":' 11 :1\, i! I ~ f; __: I ! ~ :.; I I.' 'Ie,l'
... 1; I:' \ J 1-"1'::1 l ] (,I!",:,': . (i\ it \h:I;,_:t"',,'
H,il:.:.!! \ \( i; ;'>- I. d \ '\! \, \ :1': l i 'j::. i' ,! l 'I
J)p '. ;\__!; \1~lIl' L :1; ji I.,
.~lhHI i'[))11fl1(\t)\\e:'dlh npu!c\;p'd. \1,\ ;'1
i .iii:,:" .n:. l'l.r:.ld ;_ ~q()
Il.::;~ r I ll,\J");1.
.\~, IllL' rllallauill,~ .lg\:!h':.\ pI tIlL I~t!!d IU~;ih.',! ,:( f!1\.' ;".'Ill..! III (irilt"in rZd. \'. i!jil!! '\.'1. f!I<'1 I, I'
~:.;l.L R.ln:~~' ~ \"lllh l.k,' ,!I.-.~' l.T'; ~ " 'II' . -I',~
ill,\\\ ,,\ 1\ ....\ >tcnl
I he' 1'1" T" ' .,.J " :1'.,'11 1,':\1 \'. i ", h \\ ill I,v :,:.:!. [,', \.'1, 'I i,'1L ':1... I ;I~,l' 'r 11', \\
I~"j'~':n ll:ll 'J;llil)Jl,d '.,"I:\r!I1C' 1<"'.,,1:"'" :''"-t.>(:nl \,LlniL~..'llh.:rll ~'L;n "(1;'1 :)1;'-' :'1, i1 , , i:l
~.Iil.' L'.:1'\,:1l11,.I1i thl' l'..~I::-,\..'n1l..:l1t \...'~ 'llfunn> :\':> ; ,ili ;t>
. \ ,)ril1r;l.! i..-;'ll",' ;jiLlrc~,,--;l,.'d in 'Ll.:' >,1>, 1(:1'<.:1"', !, \', .dl'r."h,-t,j ;.,l[:,.;;ll!; 'l: i! . e
al k,IIIH~ Rl''l'rl c' 11l1ld~ '( hi~ ill,; I,,,-l. ili....ICd...~: Iii '~i;)rn;\\;lk"'; r: jlil
or j)j"~alljc ~tlld itli.Jr~:t1lj\.' nl~H\.:ri.l
. ()bjlol.:lh~' 3 _, 11l'thl.: PL:ll ~pl','ifl....:"':'\ 'lI..ldrc...;-,t.::-- \\(.irkiJt~ \\.l'li 1,;ddJ,- Inll'ri.:',I" 11, "jJ, I:;.. ! Ie ! ,.
i~;lI:i.d '.\,;'jh..'I'"hlod l~: inlj1I\'\\'V 111\.' ..-:',;:l, l~.lf,,',;l1',,'r IL'i\\, i ~ d. ~ 11 i l. 1!"'.:l11 I ~'d {",.IL
. (.lbj",'1 ill' .1, I "f rhc' Plan ,al h i'l P:!'l !()I' r 1,<,: l\c'.'cT\ c' [, I l ,I' ", h,,; 1',....,'1I1',!\ Pl" 'I,','l', ~,', id,'" i I '.
l.'tfe(ti\ e st\)rnl\\ater n)anat!enlelll~1r;rtt~~I(,,' hI r(.dil(~' J'nnp{lllli ~\iur,,"\.' p\ lit :;! II kl~'id;li~' iJid
r......"~~-'r(. l'al dr:':: ':'!"H.'l.:r fL l\\
I'll-aSl' d,., 110t I,csitnl<.: 1" (,)/IUd 111<': iI \"'li Il;~\" ;111\ quc,""tiul1.' at -,.il).,; ~:,6,~ 11.1. ...\tl:n"'I--~11 ~q
gM) .1)l1,)ni{dl'j1.'I:Jk IL\1'
~il',,-c'fl'h ,
/f( ~/
(~~ /~ ..~.,
./ ,
/bJ
(;~i~: ,:.111'11
I );n:ct(,r
,;: ,",',' ( ,.. ;1, t,,:.
I"~, I( ,I, i ..
~'--".~
-. ,-~_. -----~,._------,-~--,---,~~., -,"~--~,....,..."_.._~-"._--,--'"'-"'_..,,. .._00',,_,.'- "'__'~~'__'_.,"~.'"'' "o",,,,.,",._~_,.,,~,,,...",,,, nO". '".o.,~,,'",~
168 8
FY 2010 SECTION 319 GRANT PROPOSAL APPLICATION
PROJECT: GRIFFIN ROAD STORMWA TER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PROJECT FUNDING: $721,737 FY10319 $481, 158 Match
LEAD ORGANIZATION: Collier County Transportation Department, Stormwater Management
CONTACT PERSON: Brandy Otero, Operation's Analyst
(Name, Address, Phone)
COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS:
Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Friends of Rookery Bay, South Florida Water
Management District Big Cypress Basin Board, Griffin Road Homeowner's Association.
PROJECT ABSTRACT:
The Proposed Griffin Road Stormwater Improvement Project is located near the southwestern
terminus of Griffin Road in the East Naples area of Collier County off of US41 Tamiami Trail and
Barefoot Williams Road. The project will be constructed on Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve property. The focus of the project is to provide water quality treatment facilities
and an adequate stormwater outfall for the area. The project will include improvements to a system
of ditches and a small canal which are currently discharging without water quantity and quality
discharge controls. These facilities will serve older established neighborhoods that were
constructed prior to the current water management regulatory controls and associated best
management practices. The project is a collaborative effort between Rookery Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve, South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin,
Friends of Rookery Bay, Griffin Road Homeowner's Association and Collier County,
Collier County will be playing the lead role in the project by providing project management and
commissioning the design and permitting services for the project. Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve will be providing the land and will also be providing ecology consulting services
for the project. An easement for the property will be provided to Collier County allowing the
proposed land use. South Florida Water Management District, Big Cypress Basin will be providing
technical and permitting support and the Griffin Road Homeowner's Association and Friends of
Rookery Bay will be providing support and stakeholder input.
Currently, the outfall for the drainage basin served by the proposed project consists of a system of
ditches and swales constructed to drain the area with no accommodation for water quality
treatment or quantity discharge controls. There are few detention facilities within the drainage
basin. The existing drainage system relies on ditches and culverts that are currently maintained by
homeowner associations or Collier County. These ditches and one small canal discharge to
Rookery Bay partially as a point source discharge to Henderson Creek within Rookery Bay
National Estuarine Research Reserve. Discharge also occurs through an abandoned system of
ditches and swales on Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve property that were
previously used for agriculture and urban drainage.
The area has increasingly experienced poor drainage. The basin is largely served by septic and
on site disposal facilities. The elevated groundwater has adversely impacted the performance of
the septic systems. The area is also served by individual wells for potable water supply. Residents
in the area are reporting that the elevated water table has created problems with the individual
potable water supply wells.
1
".",~,-,-,-"~"--,-~",,,,,._........_~. r '. n~ ,,,,,,,..,,,...,,, "-,.....~"'''-~"."'''_.''''''_'''_!lIi_''''....""~'' .".",0,".""",,--..-.
168 8
This project seeks to establish a reliable water quality treatment facility and a drainage outfall by
replacing the old system constructed prior to current water management regulations with new
facilities constructed in accordance with current design technology utilizing best management
practices and controls. The desire is to supplement the elimination of the point source discharge
with detention facilities and controlled discharge facilities.
The project is expected to result in a net benefit in water quality by constructing a lake and filter
marsh that will provide water quality treatment. Furthermore the project will entail constructing a
control structure in the form of a long broad crested weir that will control stormwater discharges to
Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. This combination of stormwater facilities will
replace the existing uncontrolled discharge to Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.
The project should also provide diverse open fresh water and marsh habitat that will be integrated
into the natural upland and estuarine transitional areas within the subject property. These habitats
will replace an abandoned farm field that has experienced an exotic vegetation species invasion.
The elimination of exotic vegetation within the project area will also be undertaken. The completed
project should provide opportunities to illustrate water quality treatment best management
practices and marsh creation as a means to control and treat discharges from older developed
areas into natural systems of national significance.
PROJECT LOCATION AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS:
The project location is depicted in the Appendix as location map and is located within the limits of
Collier County District 6 and the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Plan. As a result the project is
consistent with Section 319 funds target objectives which state that the funds will be targeted first to
watersheds with a comprehensive watershed plan. The receiving water bodies are listed as impaired by
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Coastal Rookery Bay) and EPA (Henderson
Creek) but TMDL limitations have not been established for the receiving water bodies.
The location is environmentally strategic in that the project is situated along the interface between
existing and ongoing urban development and sensitive natural lands designated as a national
research reserve. The project location is within the limits of Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve. The water treatment facilities will be located in an impacted area which was
previously used for row crop farming and is now invaded by exotic plant species. In order to
minimize impacts, the construction of the facility will be in already impacted areas and post
construction and restored habitat will include open water and wetland habitats which will result in a
net improvement to the watershed habitat.
The watershed can be generally characterized as an urban fringe to urban watershed with a variety
of land uses. The watershed contains estate sized lots of rural character with no water
management or treatment facilities. The estate size lots are used for residential habitations,
ornamental horticultural and other agricultural land uses. Much of the development within the basin
was constructed prior to the implementation of the current water management regulations. As a
result, volume discharge and water quality discharge are not managed and the design criteria did
not provide adequate drainage for the area.
Portions of the watershed contain master planned communities with and without golf course
amenities and commercial land uses that are highly impervious. Travel trailer recreation and
manufactured homes are also located in the watershed and these development areas are highly
impervious and do not contain adequate water quality and volumetric discharge attenuation
facilities. Only a small portion of the basin has been developed in accordance with current water
management regulatory controls. The following base information is provided as requested in the
2
.
"--"'"-"'"~ ' _~~_"."""'_" '~"".m<""""",..,_" ....-___~- ~T - ;--~._...._.-;., .',- ........~ ,-....-~"......"" _.....,.."......"'.,...........,..'N,.. ., ..."'...,...-.."........,
168 8
grant application instructions.
Watershed Name: Collier County District 6 (or HUC - Big Cypress Swamp)
Latitude: 81 43' 21"
Longitude: 26 03' 06"
Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC): 03090204
Land Uses within the Watershed (acres and percentages of total):
Land Use Acres %
Sinale Familv Residential 258 46
Low Densitv Residential 211 37
Open/Undeveloped 98 17
Land Use Totals (Acreaa$ and %) 567 100
POLLUTION REDUCTION STRATEGY:
The pollution reduction strategy includes the implementation of structural and non structural best
management practices that will improve the basin water quality and quantity discharge
characteristics. The structural best management practices include the construction of 43 +/- acres
of lake and created wetlands constructed on land disturbed as part of an abandoned agricultural
land use. The lake discharge will be controlled through the construction of a multiple hundred foot
broad crested weir designed to produce sheet flow discharge at less than one foot per second
discharge velocity. Two weirs will be used to distribute stormwater to the south and north as
required to emulate historic drainage patterns. The lake and filter marsh will provide approximately
12,960,000 CF of volumetric water quality treatment.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE(S):
The project objectives are as follows.
. Eliminate a historic man made point source discharge which is responsible for lowering
water tables in the area during the dry season and promoting unnatural point source
discharges during the wet season.
. Collect untreated stormwater discharges from unregulated developments and provide for
volumetric storage and water quality treatment prior to discharge into an estuary of national
significance.
. Provide discharge controls for quantity discharges from a drainage basin that contains
limited stormwater treatment facilities.
. Provide for salt water barrier to prevent saline water intrusion into freshwater groundwater
resources.
. Provide for future opportunities to measure level of treatment and establish useful treatment
mechanisms for urban-natural system interface areas.
. Restore native habitat in an area that has been disturbed by agricultural activities in the
past and now harbors exotic vegetation and the resulting seed source for further exotic
vegetation proliferation.
3
0V._.,..____.--__ .~,"__.__~"_ "_"'"""""~_"__''''''H'.~","M_"'_' _, ". "_~.,,,,,_",__,, "II~ III '_""'_""_'_'-',~.... ....""'" .. ~"""'~'<_"~""""____""W<'="'_" ~.,.. ,~~"__,__
16B 8
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project consists of a 43 +/- acre lake and created marsh that will provide water quality
treatment and volumetric storage for the drainage basin identified in the attached exhibits. The
project also includes improvements to existing ditches that will feed the lake and filter marsh with
stormwater discharges for the drainage basin. The project includes a public input process during
design and public education component and urban runoff management and control plan. Water
quality monitoring programs consistent with South Florida Water Management District permit
requirements will be implemented and data will be maintained for future use in implementing the
design of future projects.
ESTIMATED POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION:
BMPs Installed Other Other
TSS TP TN Sediment BOD kg/yr kg/Yr
Lake/Filt Marsh kglyr kglyr kglyr kglyr kg/yr
In Pre-Project 430.2 2134 40.7 7520
"
III
0 Post-Project 111.2 1223 5.86 2153
..J
..
c Load
J! 319 911 34.9 5366
.= Reduction
'0
a. % Reduction 74.1 42.7 85.7 71.4
BOD Other Other
TOTAL TSS TP TN Sediment kglyr kg/Yr
kglyr kglyr kglyr kglyr kglyr
In Pre-Project 430.2 2134 40.7 7520
"
III
0 Post-Project 111.2 1223 5,86 2153
..J
-
c Load
J! 319 911 34.9 5366
.= Reduction
'0
a. % Reduction 74.1 42.7 85.7 71.4
MODEL USED: Harvey Harper for Phosphate and Nitrogen and STEPL for Sediment and
Biological Oxygen Demand. See Appendix C for both calculation spreadsheets.
LAND OWNERSHIP STATUS: Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection will be granting a drainage easement for proposed
activities as part of the project. An application for a drainage easement is currently being prepared.
A letter from the land management agency recommending approval of the drainage easement is
shown in the Appendix C.
OUTPUTS/DELlVERABLES: The ultimate goal of the project is to design, permit, and construct
the Filter Marsh as outlined in the descriptions above. The following is a description of the tasks
needed to accomplish the goal.
Task 1 - Construction Plans and Permitting: This project is currently being designed and
permitted. Necessary permits will be obtained prior to construction. Consultant engineering and
inspection services will be required during construction to ensure that construction plans and
specifications are followed.
4
,
-"~"""'''.'''~~'''''~''"~'''.''''''''''''''__~'''''''''''''''''''*''__~ "",,,'17'l1w. -_ ","_"'~"_'_""_""'~"'C",_ - ""~-'-"'~"-'~"~-'- . ~_"""'_'W"< _..,_,..,.~__,__._
_'W""___~~__~""""_'
168 8
Task 2 - Public Involvement: A minimum of two public information meetings will be conducted to
inform the public and solicit comments from residents in the area, The second meeting presenting
the near completion design will be used to educate the public in stormwater best management
practices.
Task 3 - Construction: Construction of the Griffin Road Area Stormwater Improvement Project will
begin after all necessary permits have been received. Collier County and Rookery Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve will provide project management and inspection to ensure that
improvements are built in accordance with the plans.
Task 4 - Monitoring: Water quality monitoring will be provided in order to demonstrate the project
benefits. A preliminary Monitoring plan has been included in this proposal as Appendix A. A
detailed water quality monitoring plan will be submitted for review within three months of the grant
award.
Task 5 - Project Administration: Collier County will be responsible for contractor selection. Collier
County and Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve will be responsible for contract
development and administration and construction inspection. Collier County staff will be
responsible for financial accounting and grant reporting to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, including the required regular progress reports, draft project report, comprehensive final
project report, and annual effectiveness monitoring reports.
5
.
~,-,-.._.- ,'-, .~,,~-,..,-,.--- '.. ,._..~-",,- ._, *'......",._--",-"'-"''''_.... _......"""'__;,"""''''_._.,''''"...~_,."''"._"'.~~ .."...~.' ,,,,,,,,,,_''''_'_;__'''~~"'''',~,,.,_,,,,..". "'eunH'_, .-
16B 8
PROJECT MILESTONES:
Task Activity Start Complete
1 Grant Application I Proiect Setup Month 1
2 Survey and Project Data Collection Month 2 Month 4
3 Civil Engineering Design Month 2 Month 4
4 Construction Plans I Documents Month 3 Month 5
5 Permitting Month 6 Month 16
6 Grant Award Month 16 Month 16
7 Construction Month 17 Month 25
PROJECT BUDGET:
Project Funding Activity 319 (h) Amount Matching Match Source ·
Contribution
Staff $46,895 Collier County*
Travel
Equipment
Supplies
Contractual $60,420 $39,580 Collier County*
BMP Implementation $661,317 $338,683 Collier County*
Monitoring $36,000 Collier County*
Public Education $20,000 Collier County*
Other:
Total: $721,737 $481 , 158
Total Project Cost: $1,202,895
Percentage Match: 40
*If a stormwater utility or other dedicated recurring fee is contributing, put that information
in the following table.
MATCH SOURCE INFORMATION:
Match Source Name Description ERUlFee
Collier County* Dedicated millage from Ad Valorem taxes .15 mils
for stormwater management
6
.
~"'~~ '-"""^.-- ....,..... ".".,.,....... ~...~_._,~"'"' "'-~_....._----"-".>"',""'-.""., H._.___M'__
~.~.."....~
16B 8
BUDGET BY TASK:
Project Funding Activity 319 (h) Amount Matching Match Source
Contribution
Task 1 - Construction $60,420 $39,580 Collier County
Plans and Permitting
Task 2 - Public $20,000 Collier County
Involvement
Task 3 - Construction $661,317 $338,683 Collier County
Task 4 - Monitoring $36,000 Collier County
Task 5 - Project $46,895 Collier County
Administration
Total: $721,737 $481 ,158
Total Project Cost: $1,202,895
Percentage Match: 40
OTHER FUNDING (Not Match - such as land acquisition or other federal grants):
Amount
$197,620
$150,500
$360,000
Total: $708,120
OTHER INFORMATION: If this is a multi-year project, have you requested sufficient funds to
complete the project (assuming funds requested herein are provided)?
(State yes or no, and, if no, provide an explanation): Yes: [8J No: 0
The Lead Organization, as listed on the first page of this form, agrees to comply with all
requirements specified in the guidance package and in the federal grant regulations.
Checking "no" or "yes, except" will cause the project to have a lower ranking than similar
projects by lead organizations that agree to the requirements:
Yes:[8J No:D Yes, except: D (Note: List exceptions below.)
Exceptions:
REFERENCES CITED:
NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL APPENDICES IN A SEPARATE WORD DOCUMENT. THIS
MAY INCLUDE MAPS. FIGURES OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO
INCLUDE WITH YOUR APPLICATION
7
.
"'''"'-"--'.-- -''''''''''''''. ... m. .. .'""","'~ ,._,. ".,.,. ,.",. """., ,,,,",,,- ,,'_~"'H'''',c\;'''lIIJl''f T ........"._""--","......^'.._""---_."','",.,~... '''"~'''''~__''''~.....~..''''.,,___..~_'~ w.,__..~._"""""._''".,,''__--..
.,.".....,.....-..........--.----