Loading...
Resolution 2002-456 16H I RESOLUTION NO. 2002-~ RESOLUTION OPPOSING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER WHEREAS, Article VIII, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution expressly recognizes that the provisions of the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter, as it was established in the 1885 Florida Constitution, are to remain in effect; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter currently provide two mechanisms for Charter amendments to be presented to the electorate: (1) placement on a local ballot by the County Commission or (2) placement on a local ballot by initiative petition of electors registered in Miami- Dade County; and WHEREAS, these existing provisions give the County Commission and local electors the ability to control the direction of local government issues, functions and powers; and WHEREAS, because the provisions of the Miami-Date County Home Rule Charter are incorporated in the Florida Constitution, they may not be changed without a statewide vote of the electorate that amends the Florida Constitution; and WHEREAS, House Joint Resolution 471, adopted by the 2001 Florida Legislature, and which is now proposed Constitutional Amendment 3 to the Florida Constitution for the General Election in November 2002, if adopted, would amend Section 6 of Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida to authorize the legislature to propose amendments or revisions to the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter by the enactment of special laws; and WHEREAS, the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners adopted County Resolution No. R-214-02 requesting the Florida Legislature to repeal the joint resolution, however, the requested repeal was not acted upon by the Florida Legislature; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Florida Association of Counties finds that the proposed constitutional amendment is contrary to the best interests of the citizens of Miami-Dade County in that it would allow the state legislature, comprised of persons predominantly representing areas outside of Miami-Dade County, to influence, shape and even control the County's functions and powers relating to local government affairs - a power enjoyed by the County since 1957, 16H 1 and that the amendment would constitute an erosion of Miami-Dade County's existing home rule powers, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Florida Association of Counties passed a resolution opposing the passage of Constitutional Amendment 3 to the Florida Constitution for the General Election in November 2002, and has urged each Florida county to pass similar resolutions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: 1. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners, in full support of the Board of Directors of the Florida Association of Counties, hereby opposes proposed Constitutional Amendment 3, which would amend Section 6 of Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and permit the diluting of Miami- Dade County's existing home rule powers by authorizing the State Legislature to propose amendments or revisions to the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter through the enactment of special laws; and 2. The Board urges Collier County voters to vote against proposed Constitutional Amendment 3. This Resolution Approved and Duly Executed this ~ day of ~002. )1., ... .~ "..I,~ ....:..~~:':~ 6'<." ATTE.~r:'.:.~~. _~>>:O'" Dwight.~,~;Bipck'i'~le.~. . BY: ~. . .... .'~' ~: '" 1:i!. D~~~f~~" "$"" ..... ~') ~~.-: .>~.(~~;., Att~$ t (l~fty}~:Ctra 1 rman . s 11gnlAtur0 onlJ. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Oo-n- -' ~ - Ramiro Manalich, Chief Assistant County Attorney 1\/5/0z. HlRamirolResolutionsAmd. To State Const.-verslon2