Resolution 2006-116
RESOLUTION 2006 - 116
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A GOLF
COURSE MAINTENANCE FACILITY WITHIN THE
RSF-3 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY) ZONING
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.04.03,
TABLE 2, FOR PROPERTY LOCA TED AT 220
CYPRESS WAY EAST.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of
Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing
regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is
the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly appointed and constituted
planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use to
allow a Golf Course Maintenance Facility within the RSF-3 (Residential Single Family)
zoning district pursuant to LDC Section 2.04.03, Table 2, on the property hereafter described,
and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that
satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters
required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection IO.08.00.D. of the Land
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The petition, CU-2005-AR-8081, filed by Fred Reischl, AICP of Agnoli, Barber, &
Brundage, Inc. representing with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "B",
and the same is hereby approved for a conditional use according to Section 2.04.03 of the
LDC in the RSF-3 (Residential Single Family) zoning district for a Golf Course Maintenance
Page 1 of2
Facility in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit "C") and subject to the
following conditions:
Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote.
Done this
9th
day of
Ma.v
I
,2006.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~~.~('
eputy Clerk ^~.Utt ii.i'to CJi-il1r~ ,
'19n..1.y:~ ,;1'1 ~ .
BY: ~,,;. ~~
Frank Halas, CHAIRMAN
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Collier County Planning Commission Findings of Fact
Exhibit B: Legal Description
Exhibit C: Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan dated September 2005
Exhibit D: Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of2
05/09/2005 21:23
9417329403
MARK STRAIN
PAGE 02/02
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-2005-AR-8081
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.04.03, Table 2, of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional
use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not
adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
of:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan:
Yes1- No~
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
YesL No_
c. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor
effects:
_ No affect or ~ Affect mitigated by b",.Q..teV"""s t ~Acl"-j
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district:
Compatible use within district
Yes $,.._ No_
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) be
recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
CHAlRMAN;~~(l~
EXHIBIT A '
DATE:S~ to -0'
'>i.-d-~-::X-X-X~)( ~,
~o 'n 1u.'E. ~..sa'
(SOO'05'38"E) (330.86')
~::l
~~
U - I,rJ
::a:~z
O[,J:J
Uo
\r-l~
W
u
2:
W~
IJ..:;:]
ZlL.
:5'0
o iE ffi
~;:) 0
lL.O C
o IJ1 ~
W
u
:z
w
IJ..
::s:
%
0:;':-
W
%
tt:
o
U
z
~
[5
(0
C
Li.I
:J:
Vl
0-
:!
t,.l
.
ID
-M
z
o
~~
-J~
If)
1.0
-:r ~
'wco
'--rv
1-1-1
(/)l.1......r
~ON
::Cvz
~'-.o
o.....t;
ZI-Lu
w~(/)
::r::?;;li..
I-::J:o
~... li.. I- ~
OfS,
NZ"--
:::-'wti
IW
:I:I-~
I-li..I
~o~
Z 0
CJ1
Il)
N
""
w
r-(2)
~~
2i-
(/)r')
<0)
w~
W:,,::
r.:lc
0<(0
~o:J
<.
~~
1-0
all::
ti?tl:
1l)U')
c:'i'<t
wW
u~
~-l
IJ..~
ll::
C'jw
00..
o~
~o.
<D~
II ~
I tt:W
Jj Ij ~~
~! I 8 w
~ ' Uw
~~
! II ~~
~ 1i:1 8~
.u ,: I ~8
t3~, ~ --=-~~
:2; z ""l, u z ...
~:J 1.....-..; ffi w
::s: lL. t1::r, i u..
zO OJ' Z It)
1i!: 1~1 ~ N
~~ l:.Oi 0 ...,
~% !.OI i i-~
u.UJ Ii .:z <
IJ..' , roWQ..
~N~ l~:) ~i
UJ 55::
W:x:
:o;;;t"l ~g
I'v : Z o:J
t;o ~ .
l5~
1.[00, ; I- 0
a:l ' 0 Q::
!CJ? 12 2e
/i'--" . ~ ~
to
l-
iD
:I:
><
w
~
z
:::i
'w
Zu
<z
~lt
'<
LU
t:X
."C
u.w
O~
i=l<
~Z
LU~
QZ
I-f
'<
:E
co
,.,
w
u
Zw
li3
ZIJ..
~o
-of!:
~::>
o
L...V1
o
oil:
Z"-
IN:3Vi:3S'''3 ^J.I~rln I.I.lONV
~N-~l~~F~~:
~
~
~
~
~
~
h
~
~
8
I
~
~
a
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
fS
8
~
a
\J
~
~
~
I
I
I
J
I
I
IT-
I ,
I :
I i
I
I
I
I
I
~I
. I
01
- I
~I
0:
U-l1
<:/)1
01
0..,
01
~,
0..1
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I i I /
I I ,
I 1//'
I )
!/>'/
I /
~ /
_.I
/j
(
/
!
I
I
~I
-+1,
I
I ~<:/)
I ~i~
I
p
U-l<:/)U-lU-l
~z~~
zg~u~
EiJ~:2~~
f-U~Z~
...Joo<__
<...J",-...Jc:l
I
I
r---
,
I
--------9
IS' TY!~-'~B~'J::~~?~~~!~__~~~~~R
~ . I
I U-l f- : _
if-::;; : .
I <0 I I
' ~::;; :
I : /--
I I (
I .
!
: ~I.
IU-l
,"'-
,",-
I~
~ c:l. I
I ~.
: c) 1-
'<:/) V)
i~ ~I'
1<.-+1
In
~.
......
:1:330'
~<
U-l~<:/)
f- <:/)
< U-l
~ .U
~f-U
~::;;<
000<:1
f-::;;
<:/)
I
.
.
I
15' TYPE "B"
..-.. ..
U-l f- . ~ <:/) ~
oZ><:<:/)!:!:J OU-l
<U-lOOc: ~::;;<:/)
~::;;g:~= f-e::~
<~~~f- ~~U
~<.....o..~ ><:O'u
OU-l 1.l.;U-l<
.
, .
-..------------------------------------------------------------..--.------J:
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
.-..-..-
><~~ ::;;-~t3EiJ-t;j
9f-C: ~U<N~
......<:/)....l <:/):;;::~-"",
0..__ ;.."':0...J0
~><:~ <:/)U-lf-~Z
::: d :::= :::: :::: - ~ i5 00 ~ '" _ ::: =
.LSV3: A V fA SS3:1fdA;)
-----------------------
-----------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------
{
~
~~
to.
~
~
~t
o
?-
m
:E
x
w
"--.--
"
Conditions of Approval
1. No variances from any LDC requirements have been granted as part of the
acceptance of the subject site plan. If it is determined that the site plan is not in
compliance with any LDC requirements, the site plan must be brought into
compliance prior to the issuance of any site development plan approval. The use
and general site location is limited to what is depicted on the site plan identified
as "La Playa Golf Course Maintenance Facility - Conceptual Site Plan" prepared
by Agnoli, Barber and Brundage, Inc., dated September, 2005, except as further
conditioned below.
2. The Conditional Use will expire three years from the date of approval if no
development is commenced; however, Conditional Use extension approval may
be sought if such is allowed by the LDC regulations in effect at that time.
3. An 8-foot high fence must be provided along the subject property lines. Said
fence must be located at a minimum of 6 feet inside the property line with the
required landscape plantings located on the outside of the fence.
4. The applicant must submit a contaminated soil management plan and the results
of the additional sampling in the proposed excavations (water management areas)
to the County as part of the Site Development review.
Exhibit D