Agenda 06/23/2009 Item # 7A
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 1 of 61
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. SV-2009-AR-14140 Red Roof Inn, represented by Brent Forte of
Site Enhancement Services, Inc. is requesting four Sign Variances from LDC Section
5.06.04. The first variance is from Subsection 5.06.04 C.t. which requires a minimum
separation of 1,000-feet between signs to allow 262:1: feet between signs. The second
variance is from Subsection 5.06.04 C.t.a. which allows a 15-foot high sign to allow a 23-
foot high sign. The third variance is from Subsection 5.06.04 C.1.c. which allows a sign
area of 80 square feet to allow a sign area of 96:1: square feet. The fourth variance is from
Subsection 5.06.04 C.4 which permits one wall sign to allow an additional wall sign. The
subject property is located at 1925 Davis Boulevard, in Section 2, Township 50 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) consider the above-referenced Sign Variance
petition and render a decision pursuant to Section 5.06.00 of the Land Development Code (LDC)
in order to ensure that the project is in harmony with all applicable codes and regulations and
that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
The applicant proposes to replace existing old signage at the Red Roof Inn, a 36 year old motel.
The proposed wall sign (Sign A) will replace an existing wall sign with a smaller sign in
approximately the same location on the west building elevation. The proposed wall sign (Sign B)
will replace an existing wall sign with a smaller sign in approximately the same location on the
south building elevation. The proposed on-premise sign (Sign C) will replace an existing on-
premise pole sign face that was permitted in 1995. (See sign details in the Staff Report).
In addition to the existing Red Roof Inn on-premise sign (Sign C) located along Davis
Boulevard, there is an existing on-premise sign for an IHOP restaurant (Sign D) located
approximately 252 feet away from the Red Roof Inn on-premise sign. There is also an existing
directional entry sign (Sign E) located approximately 12 feet away from the Red Roof Inn on-
premise sign. The applicant proposes to remove the existing directional entry sign. (Sign E)
The requested variances for each sign are as follows:
1. The first variance is from Section 5.06.04 C.l. of the Land Development Code (LDC),
which requires a minimum separation of 1,000 linear feet between signs to allow a
separation of 262:1: feet between Sign C and Sign D (existing IHOP sign) as shown on the
Site Plan.
,,,,.--.
Page 1 of 4
C:\Documents and SettingslbodinejudilLoeal SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLKJ081EXECUnVE SUMMARY Red RoofInn 6-15-09.doe
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 2 of 61
2. The second variance is from Section 5.06.04 c.I.a. of the Land Development Code
(LDC), which allows a maximum height of 15 feet for a pole sign to allow a height of
23:1: feet. (Sign C)
3. The third variance is from Section 5.06.04 C.l.c. of the Land Development Code (LDC)
which allows a maximum sign area of 80 square feet to allow a pole sign area of 96:1:
square feet. (Sign C)
4. The fourth variance is from Section 5.06.04 CA. of the Land Development Code (LDC),
which requires that one wall sign shall be permitted for each single-occupancy parcel, to
allow two wall signs on the Red Roof Inn building. (Signs A and B)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this Sign Variance petition would have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located in the Urban Designation
of the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The GMP does not
address individual Variance requests but focuses on the larger issue of the actual use. The site is
consistent with the Future Land Use Map.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is
consistent with the Future Land Use Element, although the Variance request is not specifically
addressed.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
Approval of this Sign Variance would have no affordable housing impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
There are no environmental issues associated with this Sign Variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL fEAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The Environmental Advisory Council does not normally hear Variance petitions and did not hear
this one.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC heard petition SV-2009-AR-14l40 on May 7, 2009, and by a vote of 8 to 0
recommended to forward this petition to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a
recommendation of approval of all four sign variances subject to the following condition:
1. The existing directional sign (Sign E shown on Resolution Exhibit A page 2 of 8) for the Red
Page 2 of 4
C:\Documents and Settings\bodinejudilLocal Settings\Temporary Internet FiIes\OLKI08IEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Red RoofInn 6-] 5-09,doc
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 3 of 61
Roof Inn located at the eastern entrance on Davis Boulevard shall be removed.
Staffs recommendation is different from the CCPC recommendation and is as follows:
1. Approval for the first variance and the fourth variance (the wall sign and the separation
distance, as identified on pages 1 and 2 of this executive summary) and for denial of the second
variance and the third variance (the off-premise sign height and area). Thus, the on-premise sign
(Sign C) will not exceed the current Code requirements for size (shall be limited to an area of 80
square feet and a height of 15 feet).
Because one letter of objection has been received and Staff is not in agreement with the CCPC
recommendation, this petition has been placed on the Regular Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The Petitioner is requesting four Sign Variances to allow replacement signage at the Red Roof
Inn on Davis Boulevard. The granting of such Variances is permitted under LDC 99.04.02.
The attached staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only
and are not binding on you. Decisions regarding Variances are quasi-judicial and as such,
require ex parte disclosure. As such this item requires ex parte disclosure, and all testimony
given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed Variances
are consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner, or staff, to
satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. LDC Section 9.04.02.A requires
that "based upon the evidence given in public hearing; and the findings of the Planning
Commission" you "should determine to the maximum extent possible if the granting of the
Variance will diminish or otherwise have a detrimental effect on the public interest, safety or
welfare." Should you consider denying the Variance, to assure that your decision is not later
found to be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent,
substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below.
Approval of this request requires three affirmative votes of the Board (majority vote).
In granting a Sign Variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals may prescribe the following:
1. Appropriate conditions and safeguards in confonnity with the zoning code or
other applicable county ordinances. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a
part of the terms under which the Variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the zoning
code.
2. A reasonable time limit within which the action for which the Variance required
shall be begun or completed or both.
Page 3 of 4
C:\Documents and Settings\bodinejudi\Local Settings\Tempomry Internet Files\OLKI 08\EXECUTlVE SUMMARY Red Rooflnn 6-15-09.doc
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23,2009
Page 4 of 61
Criteria for Shzn Variances
1. There are special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the
location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved,
2. There are special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of
the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the
Variance request.
3. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC work an unnecessary and undue
hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant.
4. The Variance, if granted, will be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promote standards of health, safety,
or welfare.
5. Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special privilege
that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same
zoning district.
6. Granting the Variance will be in hannony with the intent and purpose of the LDC,
and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
7. There are natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectives of the regulation, such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc.
8. Granting the Variance will be consistent with the GMP.
The proposed Resolution was prepared by the County Attorney's Office and is legally
sufficient for Board action. -STW
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals approve the request for SV-2009-AR-
14140, subject to staffs and the CCPC conditions of approval as follows:
1. Approval for the first variance and the fourth variance (the wall sign and the separation
distance, as identified on pages 1 and 2 of this executive summary) and for denial of the second
variance and the third variance (the off-premise sign height and area). Thus, the on-premise sign
(Sign C) will not exceed the current Code requirements for size (shall be limited to an area of 80
square feet and a height of 15 feet).
2. The existing directional sign (Sign E shown on Resolution Exhibit A page 2 of 8) for the Red
Roof Inn located at the eastern entrance on Davis Boulevard shall be removed.
PREPARED BY:
Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner
Department of Zoning & Land Development Review
-
Page 4 of 4
C:\Documents and Settings\bodinejudi\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK108IEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Red Rooflnn 6-15-09.doc
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page 1 of2
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 5 of 61
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
7A
This item was continued from the June 9, 2009 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all
participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Petition: SV-2009-AR-14140 Red Roof Inn, represented by Brent Forte of Site Enhancement
Services, Inc. is requesting four Sign Variances from LDC Section 5.06.04. The first variance
is from Subsection 5.06.04 C. 1. which requires a minimum separation of 1,000 -foot between
signs to allow 262 feet between signs. The second variance is from Subsection 5.06.04
C.1.a. which allows a 15-foot high sign to allow a 23-foot high sign. The third variance is from
Subsection 5.06.04 C. 1.c. which allows a sign area of 80 square feet to allow a sign area of
96 square feet. The fourth variance is from Subsection 5.06.04 CA which permits one wall
sign to allow an additional wall sign. The subject property is located at 1925 Davis Boulevard,
in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
6/23/2009 90000 AM
Prepared By
Nancy Gundlach
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Principal Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/13/20094:44:33 PM
Approved By
Najeh Ahmad
Transportation Services
Director
Date
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
5/14/20099:18 AM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Transportation Services
MPO Director
Date
Transportation Planning
5/14/20095:01 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
Date
5/19/2009 11 :22 AM
Approved By
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Chief Planner
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/19/20092:56 PM
Approved By
Steven Williams
Attorney's Office
Assistant County Attorney
Attorney's Office
Date
5/27/2009 11: 17 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Date
5/27/2009 1 :32 PM
Approved By
Susan Istenes, AICP
Community Development &
Zoning & Land Development Director
Date
filf>' 111"\ A of>nrb Tf> "t\]:'vnnrt\ 1 ~ 'L I11npO/,. ')()')~ oj" ')()')()()Q\()7 OJ,, ')()R{) A "R noj" ,)(){)J;'Oj" ')()7{)1\.TThT
h/T 7 n()()O
Environmental Services
Zoning & Land Development Review
5/28/20099:34 AM
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 6 of 61
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Community Development &
Environmental Services Adminstrator
Date
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Community Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
5/28/20093:52 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
County Manager's Office
OMB Coordinator
Date
5/29/200910:22 AM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
Board of County
Commissioners
Office of Management & Budget
Budget Analyst
Office of Management & Budget
Date
5/29/2009 1 :07 PM
Deputy County Manager
Date
file://f::\Apeno::lTest\Fxnort\ 11) -Tllne:%)O)'i %)O')OOQ\07 % )OR()A R n% )O()F% )()7()NThJ
County Manager's Office
6/10/2009 2:25 PM
hi 1 7 n ()()Q
Agenda Item No. 7 A
AGENDA rpE1~~A. 2009
Page 7 of 61
Co. fer County
~:fFft.p-;s;r~~~~"'~~~""'-a
STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: APRIL 16, 2009
SUBJECT: PETITION SV-2009-AR-14140, RED ROOF INN
.
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Applicant:
Red Roof Inn
1925 Davis Boulevard
Naples, FL 34104
Agent:
Brent FOlie
Site Enhancement Services
6001 Nimtz Parkway
South Bend, IN 46628
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant is requesting a total of four (4) Sign Variances from Section 5.06.00 of the Land
Development Code (LDC). The first variance request is to allow an on-premise pole sign to be
located less than 1,000 feet from another sign to allow 262:1: feet between signs. The second
variance request is fro111 Subsection 5.06.04 C.I.a. which allows a 15-foot high sign to pennit a
23-foot high sign. The third variance request is from Subsection 5.06.04 C.1.e. whieh allO\vs a
sign area of 80 square feet to pennit a sign area of 96:1: square feet. The fomih variance is from
Subsection 5.06.04 C.4 which pennits one wall sign to allow an additional wall sign.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
TIle subject property is located at 1925 Davis Boulevard, in Section 2, Township 50 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map 011 the following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The applicant proposes to replace existing old signage at the Red Roof Inn, a 36 year old motel.
The proposed wall sign (Sign A) will replace an existing v-iall sign with a smaller sign in
approximately the same location on the west building elevation. The proposed wall sign (Sign B)
\\fill replace an existing wall sign with a smaller sign in approximately the same location on the
south building elevation. The proposed on-premise sign (Sign C) will replace an existing 011-
premise pole sign face that was permitted in 1995. (See sign details 011 the following pages.)
SV-2009-AR-14140
3-26-09
Page 1 of 13
<(0")..-
,,-0<.0
,0_
ON 0
Z c:ri CO
EN (j)
(j)(j)0l
=:: c rf
cu :::l
"0-'
C
(j)
Ol
<(
0-
'I
'I
J'I
J"l7
fi.
n
I
I
117-:;-; 0110'<1 /
-
-.-
;;~. ~!'IJ.o;:~ur;,
,:~~,I
~rj5 ~ i1
~ ~d "1' ~
-'> gi:~
al
LII
)) L
~ i g~ I
~~
h
'<
:: ~
~~~~~!~
~- ~:;~
i:g
,
la ..:<1
O.~~ ~}jmv .l:Y.kii:l"
f~c/l ~:~::;::~r---i Ir-~~~
""..Ii '----II ]Jt.l'", ~,'l1lC ~----)._.\ ~
~, ~l !'~:;;~':~'-L---) ~~i ~f,~,!
"", ",,,,,,,,," lL'----L~,'. h · tt__ ,,~~;?
-"/--~
~~ ~~ ~e
r~ '
v
q a/
~~
':V"~! ~ ~I
~~ ~. -:-u ~,
~~h L ~:;-
~~~Ii'" \ j >-
,.u} i!.
~ ~
~
;;
~
.
r;r~ ~~
",.., ,<:
f- Z j
~Q
-,1-
0-':
~
'i
,,~ I
i-
I
.
N
~ 1 L~~E~
i~
;n
L
'r""'"
Q..
<(
~
C)
z
z
o
N
~I
,I
ocr
<(:
I:
'"
o
01
~1
inl
'"'I
Z!
01
-i
1-,
~I
Q..
<(
~
z
o
I-
<(
o
o
-l
0)..-
o c.o
0_
NO
-0)
) <:Il
\JOl
<:Il(1:l
30..
-,
<r
it
'J
el)
1.O
>r-
eo
o
T""
:z
a
~
~
..J
W
~
(f)
w
~
CI
w
(f)
a
c..
aU)
a:~
c..z
Ci~
....
en
CIJ
lrJ
C',
00
z
a
~
w
-'
UJ
~
(f)
UJ
~
C.=:l
:z
i=
(f)(j)
-f-
(;)2
co
Ll.
o
(")
<(
Z
C)
(fJ
r-M >!
':;'..J ;
.:: Ll._ ~
.,,;.. ~ 0
\.,,L g- &i
Ozz
'"'~ I ~
f,~ t'- ffi
~..~ ~ ~
' t'- <{
1~/ '"' ~
~~ (!
o
2
~
5
z
w
(/)
~
0-
f-
Z
W
a:
Ul
LL
LL
5
w
a:
<{
L.-
:2
o
>=
.:(
,'-.)
o
-'
w
-'
t::
D...
(JJ
~
w
:2
w
a:
:J
(/)
~
:2
o
.J
W
u:
.;_7
9
-~ ~
~") >
.~> ~
c c.:::
~
<{
~
2 ~ Z
~ tt N '.
o:J,,!o
~:r:~~
2 w , (/)
:r: a u.. z
ozU)~
-;J<rlI(/)
Z
<{
~ 0
< ffi
~
<l:
I
L..-
0:
o
V)
LlJ
-'
~ ct
<C
~~
)-
.'oJ rJ)
al ,
Ceo
-=;0.. (/) a:: z
a:
a w :::l
W ~ ~ z Iii
0 w
LE ~ a ~ t- a:
w ~
0 0 a: a. :a
a. u.; :::l
a: ~ c.!l ::l ~ Z
>- Z UJ ~
0 :a 9 ffi IX) ~
@ :::l ~ :3
~ z z s: <(
a: ~ 9 0 ::l
b (/) J
:::l a.
:a -J UJ
~ p.... <(
N
r
-A.
r- ~. ::J
a:
::J:
I-
j:.. z
l 0
1=
UC/)
LLJI-
(/)z
r
"..
::s-
It)
,
f.,.
I
I
L
I '
~
11- II __.{ {~
1 Bv ---\~j;, 6 ~ "II: ·
~ ..to-,\: " "Ie
--"VI v
,,% hC:~--
\-.-
,,% 9-,v ~
-'
~
o
a:
We
~~
-'~
w -
z ..
z~
c::t<(
::J:()
UW
It)
...
cO
o
..-
ti:
a
C/)
-l
~
o
I-
(/)
LU
:J
0..
I- 0..
Z :::l
00 (/)
0:1- 0:
lL.o W
Ww ~
0:1- 0
Oz l-
I-- o..w
(/)it ~(/)
o I <ca:
1-(/)!z~Q
O~ooa:
~~fE()WS
ZwWO
::l()0:1-
~~f2~c
(/)t-(/)~~
O:XI:>CJ)
w=ow:J
~~i~?
(/)
a:
w C/)
E ~
-' :::l
-' tu
W a:
Zm ~
Zo 0
~~ ~
(Jo coo..
t:~ ~<3
-'c) I-~
WZC/)(/)<(2
(JOW~2t-
~-'~02W
oZu.<(:::l1-
0)<( coz:J
'>t002~W
u.-'g:::l:::l$:
O(/)"Z-lW
1----'-'-<(>
l.U S:02= ~
(/)I-W::loo
-O:-l'>t<f
"'~o<(C!..J
ocbMxco
w......""<O= =
Zu: C\JC!1t) 7
o ti II" . G
@=
.....w
=~~
co
u.
o
v
;2
o
~
u
o
.....J
<r
z
!:2
CJ)
Gi
=:!
10..
~
0_
;2
Q
'It tf)
~ ~
5 ex
(/)
U,J
~ ~~;
;:;; C:
c:
ctI
c"
cnJO
~i
N_
(j)U)
Ceo
~o..
.J
Lt..
:::T
(f}
to
.~
C\J
C'~
ro~l' "',_~ t,;;:;_ ~
illi i!. ~';& (~ $
col !'", f ,~'/ __I
'~l; '''l? .
I //lO-,9
:;-"1- P'<''',
..-- ~""'G'
-' &.""
<j'1-+l""';
, ~...
4J
ll..
,:5'
U)
::)
'''1"
',')
.t ~-,9
OJ
LL
o
L()
OJ ~
Z L:
c.!) ~
en Q.
~u
0_
":2
.~C
(J.)_
3m
'J
u::
ci-
{f)
cq
to
01
z
9
~
c
UJ
en
o
c-
OU)
0:1-
c-z
Lt
~:J"
C0
G~
It)
en
z
9
~
"
z
t=
enU)
-I-
~Z
u
z
<-'
en
co
u..
o
r-..
6
~..J~
lfII> u.. (/j
..1Ir. . Z
- ~ (!}
~o.Cii
(;) lI:l Z
OZ<{
;y~ 1 Q
~r-..O::
C') W
~~ ~
CL ~
a:
o
z
~
5
z
~
0-
f-
Z
W
((
~
15
w
~
g
2
o
~
u
o
-J
Lij
-'
u::
~3
Q::
~
W
~
w
a:
::l
~
~
g
W
[
"?
o
"', Q2
(~ >
;;2: LiJ
'S c::
~
~
Iii
f-
a
z co z
<(u..q,
Cl: u.. C\l .
o:::::>"!()
~ :c ~ ;::;
z W . (/j
:C<Du..z
ozU)~
,<(Cl:(/j
Vi ~
W ': ~ Q
_J "> cr ((
.:t 1::: <:{ w
if) ~
! ~
.c'E: = a
.j.:l a:l C z
5E,~ ~
==""" -
a:
~ i
~8
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 14 of 61
In addition to the existing Red Roof Inn on-premise sign (Sign C) located along Davis
Boulevard, there is an existing on-premise sign for an IHOP restaurant (Sign D) located
approximately 252 feet away from the Red Roof Inn on-premise sign. There is also an existing
directional entl'y sign (Sign E) located approximately 12 feet away from the Red Roof lIill on-
premise sign. The applicant proposes to remove the existing directional entry sign. (Sign E).
The requested variances for each sign are as follows:
1. The first variance is from Section 5.06.04 C.t. of the Land Development Code (LDC),
which requires a minimum separation of 1,000 linear feet between signs to allow a
separation 0[262::1: feet between Sign C and Sign D (existing IHOP sign) as shown 011 the
Site Plan.
2. The second variance is from Section 5.06.04 C.I.a. of the Land Development Code
(LDC), which allows a maximum height of 15 feet for a pole sign to allow a height of
23:1: feet. (Sign C)
3. The third variance is fi'om Section 5.06.04 C.I.c. of the Land Development Code (LDC)
which a1l0\\'s a maximum sign area of 80 square feet to allow a pole sign area of 96:1:
square feet. (Sign C)
4. The forth variance is from Section 5.06.04 CA. of the Land Development Code (LDC),
which requires that one \'\,all sign shall be permitted for each single-occupancy parcel, to
allow two wall signs on the Red Roof Inn building. (Signs A and B)
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
NOlth: Parking area for adjacent Grand hill hotel with a zoning designation of C-4
East: Capital Pavm Shop and then a marina with a zoning designation of C-4
South: Davis Boulevard then a vacant property with a zoning designation of C-4-GTMUD-
MXD (Gateway Triangle Mixed Use District)
West: Grand lIm, a hotel with a zoning designation of C-4
SV -2009-AR-14140
3-26-09
Page 8 of 13
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 15 of 61
AERIAL
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is located in the Urban Designation of the Future Land Use Map of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP). The GMP does not address individual Sign Variance requests
but focuses on the larger issue of the actual use.
Based upon the above analysis) staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is
consistent with the Future Land Use Element) although the Sign Variance request is not
specifically addressed.
ANALYSIS:
Section 9.04.00 of the LDC gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant
Variances. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCpe) is advisory to the BZA and
utilizes the provisions of Section 9.04.03.A through 9.04.03.H as general guidelines to assist in
making a recommendation. StaiIhas analyzed this petition relative to the evaluative criteria and
offers the following responses:
a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the
location, sizc and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
Yes. The Red Roof l1m is located approximately 180 feet n01th of Davis Boulevard (SR
84), the principal arterial road serving the prope11y. The Red Roof hm is separated from
Davis Boulevard by an IHOP restaurant) a parking lot and a landscape buffer located along
the right of way. The Red Roof Inn is a low scale building and is not readily visible from
Davis Boulevard. The wall sign (Sign B) located on the southern building fayade faces
towards Davis Boulevard. Because the subject hotel is not on a corner lot, it is only
allowed one sign pursuant to Section 5.06.04.CA of the LDC,
SV-2009-AR-14140
3-26-09
Page 9 of 13
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 16 of 61
The second wall sign (Sign A) is located 011 the western building fayade. The Red Roof
Inn is also one of three hotel sites that are interconnected through their parking lots on the
northeast corner of Tamiami Trail East and Davis Boulevard. The Red Roof Inn, of the
three hotels, has the poorest visibility intemal to the site, Once a guest is in the parking lot,
the second wall sign provides some visibility to the Red RoofInn.
b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of
the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which is the
subject of the variance request?
No. This motel is setback from the main thoroughfare, Davis Boulevard. However, the
hotel operator chose this location baek off of the road. The on-premise sign (Sign C) is a
pre-existing non-conforming sign that was pennitted in 1995.
c. 'ViII a literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDC work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create pmctical difficulties for the applicant?
Not to the applicant directly. Any hardship may be experienced by the patrons using the
propeliy as they attempt to navigate the site which is interconnected and contains three
other buildings. The existing \vall signs on the building help identify the location of the
building within the "shared" site and are not visible from Davis Boulevard or US 41,
therefore they have minimal aesthetic impact. The existing on-premise sign is pennissible
and provides visibility from the street. The presence of the lEOP sign and the
configuration of the property significantly constrain the location of the on-premise sign.
d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of
health, safety and welfare?
Yes. As previously stated, the proposed wall signs are smaller than the existing wall signs
that were permitted 8 years ago and will provide identification to a building that shares a
site with three other buildings, therefore assisting the public with site navigation.
However, the proposed on-premise sign will be replacing the same size sign that was
permitted 14 years ago. This is not the minimum variance possible for the on-premise
sign. The sign area is 96 square feet instead of the LDC prescribed sign area of 80 square
feet and has a height of 23 feet instead of the LDC prescribed height of 15 feet for a pole
sign. Pursuant to the LDC, the currently allowable sign dimensions have been deemed to
be reasonable and adequate by the conununity through their adoption in the Land
Development Code.
e. Will granting the variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied
by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structUl'es in the same zoning
district?
Yes. A Variance by definition confers some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations
specific to a site. The granting of the first Sign Variance request will allow for an additional
on-premise sign \vithin 1,000 lineal feet of another on-premise sign, The granting of the
second Sign Variance request would allO\", the on-premise sign to have an additional 16
SV-2009-AR-14140 Page 10 of 13
3-26-09
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 17 of 61
square feet of sign area than the 80 square feet currently prescribed by the LDC. TIle
granting of the third Sign Variance would allow the proposed on-premise sign to have an
additional 8 teet of height than the 15 feet of height prescribed by the LDC. The granting
of tile forth Sign Variance request would allow for an additional wall sign at the Red Roof
lIm. Each of these sign variances confers special privilege on the applicant that are not
pelmittcd by right to similarly situated propeliy owners.
f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
Land Developmcnt Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or othenvise
detrimental to the public welfare?
Section 5.06.01.A. of the LDC states that the purpose and intent of the LDC relative to
signage is to ensure that all signs are:
1. Compatible with their surroundings;
2. Designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not
endanger public safety or unduly distract motorists;
3. Appropriate to the type of activity to which they peltain;
4, Large enough to convey sufficient infonnatiol1 about the ov.mer or occupants
of a pal1icu1ar propcliy, the products or services available on the property, or
the activities conducted on the propelty, and small enough to satisfy the needs
for regulation;
5. Reflective of the identity and creativity of the individual occupants.
In staffs opinion, the request to replace a wall sign and an additional wall sign advances
these objectives. However, the request to replace a larger than code prescribed pole sign,
does not. Therefore, approval of the Variance number 1 and 4 would be consistent with the
purpose and intent of the LDC. Approval of Variance number 2 and 3 would not, as the
on-premise sign can meet the code prescribed size.
g. Are there natural conditions or ph)'sically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectivcs of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses,
etc.?
Yes and No. As illustrated on the Site Plan on page three, travelers must enter through the
IHOP site before arriving at the Red Roof Inn building which is on an interconnected site
with three other buildings. Consequently, the Red Roof Inn must rely on the additional
wall signs for patrons to easily navigate the site, The on-premises sign (Sign C) is visible
from Davis Boulevard and will continue to be visible from Davis Boulevard when
redeveloped to the current Land Development Code standards without the need for a
vanance.
h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
Yes. Approval of this Variance petition would be consistent with the GMP since it would
not affect or change any of the GMP's requirements.
EAC RECOMMENDATION:
The Environmental Advisory Council does not normally hear Variance petitions and did not hear
sv -2009.AR-14140 Page 11 of 13
3-26-09
Agenda Item No.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 18of61
this one.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the statT report for SV -2009-AR-14140, revised
March 26, 2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommcnds that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) fOlward Petition SV-
2009-AR-14140, Red Roof Inn to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation
of approval for the first variance and the fOlnih variance (the wall sign and the separation
distance, as identified on page 8 of this staff report) and for denial of the second variance and the
third variance (the off-premise sign height and area). Thus, the on-premise sign (Sign C) will not
exceed the current Code requirements for size (shall be limited to an area of 80 square feet and a
height of 15 feet). Staff's recommendation is also subject to the following condition:
1. The existing directional sign (Sign E shown on the site plan on page 3) for the Red Roof
Iml located at the eastern entrance on Davis Boulevard shall be removed.
SV-2009-AR-14140
3-26-09
Page 12 of 13
PREPARED BY:
L CH, AICP, PRTNCIP AL PLANNER
N OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIE\VED BY:
7e
n , } '"'; ,/ <> ?J!..
RA y~~#~<~~r~~LL(6lws,~o~~~ MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
/~ '-tYl ~ \S~
~USAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
,,-1
~ // ,/
/t ' - -- ):/,../,'.; L
/ ~-r--'\ ~~.
JOSEPH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR
COlvlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL
StiVICES DIVISION
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
A p ~
/; I il
lv' ( fM/l " I ' <l'l ~
MAR4P' STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
Agenda Item No, 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 19 of 61
~
-, "'>! _ ,-'"' 'C?
..::J't-:J ',.)l
DATE
fi/to /09
DATE
I
.if ~
7/1.3> I
( DA TE
6/7/{/(
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the June 9, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Meeting.
SV -2009-AR-14140
Page 11 of 11
<(0:>"'-
","OeD
0,,-
ON 0 ,
Zc00 I
ENN ~
(j)(j)(j) , z
_,...0> u.. 0
--ro en w ~
ro ::l Cl. IX I- ~ .
-OJ en U () 0...
c 0
(j) -' <(
0>
<(
~
CJ
z
z
0
'.'''.''~-' .-;-; N
c..
u
g
~
i
:JlIr.)SOliON /
-
z-
j
Sl.31,(lS~3J.NI ~t
~
. ~~~ ~
, ~~d 'i
g ~ ~ g~
Ii' g~
~ ~ ~ "~ ~::'
g .
OVOl:! N01SQNINl
L
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
i\
v
;!>
~
~
-II
~ \D ~ W
~ N. "
..... ~ ~
- z
i~
"
o
S Nl:J3Cl'M
~
[u,.s-n) l''<fI::U Il'\4lflrlVl
;;
o
"'"
~
"'"
~
,
0::
<l:
Ii
0'>
o
o
N
>
(j)
'Ii:
Z
o
l-
I-
LU
a.
0...
<(
~
z
o
I-
<(
o
o
--I
_OlUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
PEPT. OF ZONING &0 LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
.www.COIIJERGOY.NET (i)
!r
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE D~e 21 of 61
NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 04
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6968
SIGN VARIANCE P,~II'QN .
[bc SectiOrl"'9~04JJo' .
PETITION NUMBER (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
COORDINATING PLANNER
For Staff Use
I
ABOVE TO BE COMPlETED BY STAFF
~.".,_.Y;F:!~~~~!~<:L;:~;!t~;;f~~rl . :_::. ':-':,,;1~:~~1~~ ':,-~(:\": ,.~,:;:.~~, :;j:hf~',;_ :-:,;.;:ili:::!;~W~t; :,~;..~;~i-~i?;~*':::WF~~':~ii-:;;:i'i;!~:."j;i;~:":;i::J'~':~::-,,~,,: '.". _, ' _ .... .-:.', " r' ,I.,
,-,., "., l," ....._, .. APPLICA..r,-: "'OWN ER "Nr:ORMA no 1.., ":.';::,-'~,;i,-'Ji.~;~:':f..~.(:~.:/,_:.;,:.:t,:t,~;.-~~.._~~;:~..;:~.:~~~.'~;.'3~,:~,~~;,.~~;,'}"~;'1..~,:i;.~"j.~.-.~,'::",;;j;: ....;:;~.,~!tt:r..;~,t.;.:,ff~
.c.:;i:;,:~{",;:.~{:,.~!t/: ",," ",;:~ ::..' ......, .:..., . ..~ 'to" .,.. .. ',.", . . ..... .
PETITIONER'S NAME: Red Roof Inn
ADDRESS 1925 Davis Blvd
PHONE#' CELL#' FAX #'
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
AGENT: Brent Forte FIRM: Site Enhancement Services
ADDRESS 6001 Nimtz Parkway South Bend, IN 46628
PHONE#' 888-276-6922 CELL#' 574-575-0032 FAX #' 574-237-6166
E-MAIL ADDRESS:JBF@SiteEnhancementServices.com
Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself
accordingly
and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
P p fR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
_ nON/TOWNSHIP/RANGE: 2/50/25 PROPERTY 1.0.# 59715000508
SUBDIVISION NAME: UNIT BLOCK LOT
METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTION: Please see attached for further description.
ADDRESS OF SIGN LOCATION: 1925 Davis Blvd
CURRENT ZONING: C-4 LAND USE OF SUBJECT PARCEl: Hotel/Motel
Length & Height of wall upon which the Sign will be secured: Sign A: 63'.2" Sign B Please see
attached Uf Wall Sign)
Width of Subject Property: 31 2.11 feet Road Frontage)
NATURE OF PETITION
Provide a detailed explanation of the variance request including what signs are
existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using
numbers, i.e. reduce setback from 15' to 10'; why encroachment is necessary; how
existing encroachment came to be; etc.
Please see attached for descriDtion.
Please note that staff and the Collier County Planning Commission shall be guided in their
recommendation to the Board of zoning Appeals, and that the Board of zoning appeals shall
be guided in its determination to approve 'or deny a variance petition by the below listed
criteria (1-6). (Please address the folloWing criteria using additional pages if necessary.)
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the
location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved.
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of
the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the
subject of the variance request.
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and
undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the
applicant.
4. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of
health, safety or welfare.
Agenda Item No.7 A
June 23, 2009
5. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privile8g€ Ma~ 61
is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands. buildings, or structures
in the same zoning district.
6. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning
code. and not be injurious to the neighborhood. or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare.
7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals
and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes. golf course. etc.
8. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
Agenda Item No.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 24 of 61
SIGN VARIANCE PETITION
(SV) APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE
EXACT ORDER USTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT
COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED
Completed Application 12 X D
Completed Owner/Agent Affidavit, Notarized 1 [g) D
Pre-application notes/minutes 12 ~ D
Surveyor Site Plan of property depicting the 12 [2J D
following:
a) All property boundaries & dimensions
b) North arrow. date and scale of drawing
c) All existing and proposed signs-(Iabeled as
such)
d) Existing sign setbacks & proposed sign
setbacks
location map depicting major streets in area for 1 rgj D
reference
Fees:
Application Fee = $2000.00
Legal Advertising Fee for BeC = $363.00
legal Advertising Fee for CCPC = $760.00
Checks shall be made payable to: "Collier County Board of County Commissioners"
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest tbat all of the information indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include aU necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of process this petition.
~ r~Il/~~
Applicant/Agent Signature
_!.!-.:/7:P ~ __
Date
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 25 of 61
AFFIDAVIT
~~ .~tJDcn.f &~ 4 - Sf(. u. e (J<7$;.;Y1 j- COt1SV....fT;.>"'I . ({RI. ~~r ('...,... ~
wee _ being first duly sworn, depose and say that we([i!jJ)are the "'owners of
the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed .
hearing: that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the
disclosure of interest information, aft sketches, data, and other supplementary matter
attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our
knowledge and belief. W@understand that the information requested on this
application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether
computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be
advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required. information has
been submitted.
~~.e8N..~ ~s.\ SES
As property owner We(j)further authorize ~ to act as our/my representative in
any matters regarding this Petition.
Signature of Property Owner
'- t~)J \j".J ~ ~f:fUtp~
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument rvas acknowledged before me this _1~~_ day of
~~___, 20_D_'i, bY~blJ.1..&J.~J~~t:."who is personallv knqwa.to me or
has produced __ _____as identification.
---Uu ~.~ ! l -'~~_______
(Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida)
_JjlLKJlC_AJ~.Qt,,___________
(Print. Type. or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public) .
(fllk~
.. ~~'\
,....... .......) . \tICKlE AMDOR
~ /~ ~ PuIlIc. State 01 OhIo
rlf!a,.O My CommIss!oo Expires 12-08-' (}
~........O'':''''
...... ....
............
Permit #
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 26 of 61
Folio # 311 ~ <1 '3 ",,"
NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT
The undersJgned hereby gives notice that Improvement will be made to certain real
property and in accordance with Chapter 713, Florida Slatutes, the following Information
is provided in this Notice of Commencement
6. a. Lender name and address:
b. Lender's phone number:
7. a. Persons within the Slate of Florida designated by Owner upon whom notices or other documents may be served as provided by
Section 713.13(1)(a)7., Florida Statutes:
Name:
Address:
b. Phone Number
8. a. In addition to himself or herself, the Owner designates
1. Legal Description of Property:
Street Address if available
2. General description of Improvement
3. a. Owner name and address:
b. Interest in property:
c. Name and address of fee simple
titleholder (If other than owner):
4. a. Contractor name and address:
b. Contractor's phone number:
5. a. Surety name and address:
b. Surety's phone number:
c. Amount of bond:
TI1Is__for"""",",
Lot
~Lengthy legal attached
Block
Unll#
Bldg#
Subdivision/Condominium:
1925 Davis Blvd. Naples, FL 34104
Sign Installation
Red Roof Inn, Inc. 605 South Front Street, Columbus, OH 43215
Owner
$
to receive a copy of Uenor's Notice per Section 713.13(1)(b), Florida
b. Phone number of person or entity designated by owner:
9. Expiration date of notice of commencement
(the expiration date is 1 year from the date of recorcfmg unless a different date is specified)
WARNING TO OWNER: ANY PAYMENTS MADE BY THE OWNER AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT ARE
CONSIDERED IMPROPER PAYMENTS UNDER CHAPTER 713, PART I. SECTION 713.13, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CAN RESULT IN YOUR
PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICF m: r.nMlAi="',..CUCII.IT .., .c.o-r"ro ,""r-~~~~r-~ . u_ ----- --
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 27 of 61
*** OR: 4287 PG: 2297 **t
Site No. 7237
Naples. FL
Pool # 3
8128/07
EXlDBIT A
Tract 2. MARNICK CORNER, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 25.
Page 81, Public Records of Collier County. Florida.
ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Beginning at the SW comer of Tract 2. MARNICK CORNER, according to the plat
recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 81, Public Records of Collier County. and run the
following six (6) courses:
I.Thence North 000 17'20" West. departing said Northerly line of Davis Road. a distance
of 140.00 feet to a PK nail and washer found; 2.Thence South 8~ 27'40" West. a
distance of 68.00 feet to a PK nail and washer found; 3,Thence North 000 17'20" West, a
distance of 361.00 feet to a capped rebar found; 4.Thence North 890 27'40" East. a
distance of 68.00 feet to a capped rebar found; 5.Thence North 000 17'20" West, a
distance of 10.00 feet; 6. Thence North 89027'40" East, a distance of 322.00 feet;
Thence South 00 0 17'20' East, departing said lands of Grand Inn Downtown Naples Inc.,
along the Westerly line of the lands now or formerly Phillip O'Conner (as recorded in
Book 2312, Page 1069) as well as the lands now or formerly Thomas E. Sams (as
recorded in Book 2300, Page 1917), a distance of 511.00 feet to a point on the Northerly
line of said Davis Boulevard;
Thence South 89" 27'40" West, along said Northerly line of Davis Boulevard. a distance
of 322.00 feet to a point known as the point and place of beginning f~r the above-
described land.
~
N 6 2008 4'O~PM S,'fe EnL~ncement Services
o v,, . , n"
COLUER OOUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSlNG DEPARTMENT
Cil
~o. OIA~encfa It~m No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 28 of 61
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104
J '. . . .
. ADDRESSING CHECKLlSr
. ,
Please complela the foIJcwlng an!! _ to the AddressIng Oeperil.lMt at 239-252--5724 or submit In permn Ie the
Addrusing ~b.dIt at the abOVe BCkIress.. Earm mUlt be Ilanlllll'J bv AddR!am DerSOnne) prior to Dn!t4DDIlcatJon
meetina. DIt!!ase allow 3 daw for DI'DDMBIna.
Ngt alllleina will IPPf)' tc every project. Items in bold type .. required. Forms Older tmm 6 months will require
addltlcnal review and apprvvaJ by tt1e Addressing DepiJr1ment
PErrmOH TYPE (chttcJt petJIion type bs/o", complete a separefe Adc/1wJsing ChecJd/st for 88t;h PetJtion Type)
o BL (BlastIng Penntt) 8 sOP (SIe DevelOpment Plan)
~ BD (Boet Dock Exrension) SOPA (SDP Amendment)
CamIvEIJCIrcus Pennit SOPI (lniubs\ant!B1 Change to SDP)
CU (Conditional Use) B SIP (SIbi! Impravement Plan)
8 EXP (~ation Permit) 0 SIP( (lnsubstanllll Change to SIP)
FP (Final Prat B SNR (Sbwt NIrne Ch8~e)
o LLA (Lat Une Acljuarnenu SNC (Strwt Name Change - Unplatted)
~ PNC (Project NaMe Chenge) 0 TOR rrransr. rI Deveklpment Rights)
PPL (PIIna & Plat Review) ~ VA (VartIInce)
psp CPreliminarySubdMsian plat) VRP (Ve;csaalian RemCMll Permit)
PUg Rezgne VRSFP (VegltBtlan RemGVIII & Site Fill PermIt>
o RZ (Standard Rezone) 0 OTHER
LEGAl. DEiSCRPllON of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy ~tion may be aItached)
MARNrCK CORNER TRACT 2 z... - 50- Z-S
~
FOLIO (ProperlJ 10' NUMBER(s) af abow (atfac:h te, oressoci8t& with, legal de6t;t/ption if men than one) _
, 59715000508
STReET ADDRESS or ADDRESSes (as app1k:able. If 8/ready U!igned)
1925 DAVIS BLVD
· LOCAlJON MAP must be attached II'loWIng exact location of prajectIsite in Mlation to nearest publ;; mad right-okvay
· SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properUas)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAMe (if sppI/ctJbItJ)
RED ROOF INN
PROPOSED STREiT NAMES or 8PPbbl8)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMSER (fbrelCiB/ing projectsNtes onM
soP9385 - or AR".
~1af2
Nov. 6. 2008 4:05PM Site Enhncement Services
No. 01~enrHa li3m No. 7A
June 23,2009
Page 29 of 61
"
ADDRESSJNG CHECKlIST - PAGE TWO
PJ1)jAd or development names proposed far, or already appearing itl, condominium documenlB (if appIIcstion; Indk:ale
whelher pIDpOIlKI or 8)datlng)
EXlSnNG
Please Check One: ~ CheCklist. tel be FIXed back
o PersonaDy Pldwd Up
APPlICANt' NAME: BRENT FORTE
PHONE B88-27M922
FAX 574-237-8168
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or street Name epproval and is
subject to further review by the Addl'888ing Department.
-"'AFF US! ONLY
PI'ira.ry NulfttMlr 1-53- ~ Z-I
Add... Mambel' \ S '3~ l 9
'I~
Adc1r18s Number
Ad.... Number
ApplW8d by:~~
UpdatacI by:
~~
Date: 1\-0"7 -Dg
Dahl;
IF OLDER THAN 8 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMit. aJ
Plge2of2
G:\CWNnl\AppIcIIDn Fonns~ CI8dcJJ;t nw June08.daa
-------..-"'~.,---'--'''''I
I Property Record-'"~,~~keti~~'::~':'
.1
I
. Details
Agen~~~~b~
Page 30 of 61
, .E::','.'~'T;i'~'~~~i.~~~,"':':"':I~__~.,~_.<_._=_~_,~.=~_.~
(I
Parcel No.D 59715000508
~
Current Ownership
Property Addressl11925 DAVIS BLVD
I
I
I
, I
Zip 10523-409
R-ROOF UI LLC
ACCOUNTS PAYABlES
PO BOX 409
ELMSFORD
State NY
Legal~ MARNICK CORNER
TRACT 2
Section
2
Township
50
Range
25
Acres
4.34
Sub No.
~ Use Code
MARNICK CORNER
IMPROVED COMMERCIAL
~ .IJave Area
85
482500
39
2008 Preliminary Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Latest Sales History
If all Values shown below equal 0 this
parcel was created after the Final Tax RoD
Land Value $ 2,873,560.00
(+) Improved Value $ 3,337,347.00
(=. Just Value $ 6,210,907.00
(-) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00
(=) Assessed Value $ 6,210,907.00
(-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00
(=) Taxable Value $ 6,210,907.00
SOH = wSaw! Our Homes" exempt value due 10 cap on assessment
increases.
Date
10/2007
11/1995
Book - Page
4287 - 2293
2121 - 623
AInolmt
$0.00
$ 5,925,000.00
The Information is Updated Weekly.
http://WWw.collierappraiser.comIRecordDetail.asp?Map=No&FolioID=UOOOO59715000508 111612008
^ Print Map
Agend~M~~r~t~~
Page 31 of 61
Red Roof Inn
Sullldl_ona
..llla _ "1_ Urlllft.
......Iata au P Fl!l!tJ
Folio Numb-. 59715000508
tt.na: R-ROOF III LLC
lllrMlI1II &.......: 1925 DAVIS BLVD
...... ~n: MAR NICK
CORNER TRACT 2
------
o 2lXM. CollIer Counlr PnIpeI\y AppraIaer. WIlle 1he ~CDunty Property Appr8i....ls _10 pnMdlng Iho __ 8CCUl'II1e and up.-llMlBIe Inf~. 00_ __ ...lmpIled .. provided
for Ihe dllb _no b 1lIe. Of Is IntBlprBlatiDn.
.. http://www.collierappraiser.comfwebmap/mapprint.aspx?title=Red%20Root%20Irm&orie...I11612008
<(Q).,-
I'-oc.o
.0.,,-
ON 0
Z C"i N
ENC'J
(j) (l) (l)
:::::Cro
ro::lCL
u'
C
(j)
V>
<(
l:. ! ' - UIlIlS
: r- ..!..- ~ ;r:rT~ J .1" "L
i 7-- ~e--: -1"11 i 1n,-
=' i -;-- II f.------! 3Nfi.-...."
i! ~ ~I..J.I.I.'J.. .1..
!s: J ~ ---;'@ITI"l14"r-
5: I!;~IT j' .IM - 'J1UJ
: - +TI -I I J .1.1,' J. . ;r. '..; s-
o - -. ......1"1-1"1- - TT-T- -~ - -
o r---...ii €J I)~ tiE' - - -.:: f.-;:
I 1($1 ./~ EJ / / I'" ., Q Mt1 tIlZIWI'I , - 3 .
: l-:: (I-.".' 1.1.I_.r.:l.I... '-5if--"
-..: ~ '>~J~ _~! ....._ 1.1"1."- ij. ..,"- ~ . ~I-l
: ..8~~1 ~~" ~irn:TJ~~~~. _.~ .I ·
~ l~f.\B \ \~~ ~ J :ffiE]:(.:~(. ~~ J~; ~8 ~
o \ ," r - . "....- >-; i-- ~ ~ ~ l! ~ a:
- : .... ~. \ . \. \- \- \-~ ~ f:J ~. i 5 N"\
. I \. \ W1:l~ 0- =- 1--=" . u.J
i .' \ I / ,....,.!- ~ W
I \ . \. . f. r./ j;!i---!'''- 1-1~ "W
: "l.~.~.'::l :~ : ~_~ <(
!!.1. · :~\ ~: ~~. .~I;(tJ If)'
: ii \ . .-\"~A
i N... . .,- .0 .;{~
-. . ,.e ~
.;d
co
w
<
.....
(If 10) 0Il'0II !'JWI1fW - .ltlDoMW
"F"
-'0
..,-
o.
. .
"QI, !
:3.
DoS
~
:i
a:
lS lS't>
I '" I
s: ~
:~
i =--'d
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
;,
I ~
'.-J~ "
~ C~!~ r--..
,
I;
I
':.(
W ~:;
u.
<(
I.!
_._.- - -.--
- - - - _.- - - - - --
.. SJ'"'W'tMJlDJ"lD
,
!
IJ" J.. IJj
-----1i
~!
i
.
!
.
.!-.
=~
~'i
~
c,)
. '"
:-
;
~
I -
- <
.
"
-
.
:
.
T e-
.
.
g
.
':or
-~
-
OJ
fi
~
I
j
o
~
i
i
i
~
.J
;j
Ii
~
'I
4,
!R ~~
"to .. ~ lIS:il 0
Atlll : ~ ~ !i8
Ii! I If >-'1'"
i~ill:~~:[
~ &:1 8 l!: ~
II J~O:~f
P &...I !
Ii ~2~
D~ J..u8~
i I ~ i
I
z
ii
---r. .
p
c I
I. i
'I d
r I; .
~p
; I; I
i r I
II..
:B
IS.
I
I;
I
u... ..t___. ...-a-c. t
...... .........-a-e ~
.....~~~
..... ...~
~ ....-co-.zIIW .......
..... 'GIltI'" ..~
........:f 'WI ....u"'C
___ ~ la-Q-U
"-C~I&-<<-t
n-tD _ a1 llIlI-tol....
f'Iot""'."~~
__d t1lQ) ...~.-cl a-iI-i
___ .......... .00&111
t~... ,.......___
R~........, .........
C1-a. ........ ......n
_l-U ..~ 7~
......,
...... ........ ...-u...
.... 1-11 1'("....... .....-1
_...,........ ~...,.
.-
-...c-tl ~ &a'lI
.....ClllI.11:I1n~
D......... ta-c:"'I
---
t IUlllaa
: ..._-J
>-
'"
""
o
z
::>
o
m
....
III
5",
z...
...ji
~::i
I'd:
;([j
lIlII>
~~
""<
uu
co
~~
II
i
. e;:"::~,.r
~
..
.
i t ul ;:"1&:
:........ ---..
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(i)
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE Page 33 of 61
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
SV-2009-AR-14140 REV: 1
REO ROOF INN SIGN VARIANCE
PROJECT: 2008120015
DATE: 1/16/09 DUE: 2/2/09
SIGN VARIANCE PETITION
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
& SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
rffJ- Z7(g-(f122
Firm:
Current Zoning: C.4
Owne, Nam.,k~'lJ~ UL:, ~OS23-' qO?
Owner Address: f.. O. fu( 4C0) -et ty'f; itt1i) \...... I 'Ph~ne: .
Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In Sheet)
_ II"
."" .-. ~ q."i At
~S~~ -rl4JY\_k1'-{~ '1f~~ YVUL~
. ~_. '
I ...' r .,' \. ....
t tj "'p \.
\,rr........ J..........,./~. ~
"' - -
r. -/ 'ill/.I: ~- 1- /1...~V.
LX..JLi..)Jf {;;;: .
.-_...........h.
(J
-4\
- I
~o, ~~I.
· CO'Ilt!'rulQ. OV'- 1~ ~
f~ \/7:>
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 34 of 61
___ _____ _ _ T~ _ _ _ _an_ _ . . ~. ... .__
.._.__ __ ...._.... _ 1)_~\~_ "'P""' ~~~n~ 11a~C:4n~~ to A~~:t>___... .__.....
._________._ __CEE~(t<J~_.____~~~---~'=-~ . _..!_~~_~~~_#. __23~~-~:--~~-~~~
~~ _. ._&It'''T~_~~T~~ ~!"<?- of'" ~\.vG kJAj': k~~~,,~;:...
.... . Z;':U)~~. .u. 6v=- -n-\",:, 41-- ~.. .
__ .. ___.. v'~-:r:"i'-'"'? ~':'~ 9rJ r..r=.. ~"-~~ ~.~ .... .... ....
.. ._ . _..._nn_. .__~._!!:_~.?':H~JI?::._I-~T-o~ ~=-. 't"_~~__ _ _.~~ $~:._.RC2.~._)__..
.. ___.. _.. ....._ . .r.~ h_.N~_ .~~A~t.~___..~~ 4.,,",. .::x) "__IN. _.._Ii4;j.'rJ!._~_d .___._.. ._.
-- ~ .--.-.
cr. .
uu.YDAA~~) CJ'1t-~ . ..
.:B . L06 .~O'\ 5 '0'- ot ~.4- I lJJV1A~
. ~.~tS t;/I'4~ctl\ <Ci~.tD . a.,( OW OY\
OJM t\aroJb . wW!I i0~.
.~. . W\aU\ . ..y>>. VOk1'ooft~~~
~ ~9lM%t, . .
r~, 7/3
.. .$.IGN V~lf~Np.I:PErjtIQN
:$u.~~tf~~~I~~~T
Agenda Item NO.7 A
009
61
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER
LISTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
#OF NOT
REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED
,.
Completed Application (download from web site for current form) ..J 12 V
Pre-Application meeting notes 12 ~
Completed Addressing Checklist, Signed by Addressing Department..J 1 V
Surveyor Site Plan of property depicting the following: 12
~ All property boundaries & dimensions
~ North arrow, dote and scale of drawing V.
~ All existing and proposed signs (labeled as such)
~ Existing sign setbacks and PEoposed sign setbacks
Owner/Agent Affidavit signed & notarized 1 V
Location map depicting maior streets in area for reference ..J 1 V
~
10' Pre-application Fee $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or. more after the date of the last
pre-app meeting shall not be credited towbrds application fees and a new pre-application meeting will
be required.)
Review Fees: 80) 2 5'
~OOO.O Sign Variance
~ After-T e-Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions 2x the normal petition fee
~ . . Estimated legal Advertising Fee - CCPC Meeting
$ Estimated legal Advertising Fee - BeC Meeting
(any over- or under-payment will be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily
News). ~ 500
OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
D
D
D
Agent/Owner Signature
Date
~ ~ 51?
<( ..-
I'- <.0
ci '0
Zcvi~
E ('\J Ql
([) OJ
- co
m Il..
-g
(j)
::J')
<(
,~,
.,~.:
~
!if)
~.
~.'.'
~
=
~
4.:
ft
U
--1iiiiiI
,~
Q
=..
......-t. .'
~
..
<a)
J;.
.~
~
.~
~
,~.u:',..
~.
tfJ
~
Z
~
tn
~
CD
'S;
Q)
0:=
-
C
CD
E
Q.
o
a;
>
CD
C
"
c
o
....
~
tn
C
'c
o
N
w..
o
-
c
Q)
E
-
..
o
a.
Q)
C
.c
u
0
"
~
C> ~
CO
u ~
c: N
0 I
Z C")
0
~ 't
w 0-
Z C")
N
Z ...
<l Q)
.... ..0
Q. E
c ~
w Z
Z
C> Q)
l:
V') 0
V') .c
<l 0..
-
Q)
c:
>
o
u
l:
o
c:
en
en
Q)
..
"
"
<l
V)
V)
w
~
C
Q
<(
....
<
:E
I
W
I
I-
W
W
:r:
(J)
z
z
C)
~
IJ)
c
Cll
E
a
o
o
[ij
Ii;
c
Cll
9
Ii.:
.-
o
:E
I
W
---
~
w
In
:E
:>
z
w
Z
o
:J:
0..
v
o
(;)
Q!
m
:>
CD
...
f--
0..
W
o
-...;.
z
0::;
V)~
>u..
C
>-
f--
~
::::>
o
u
~
""-
!f2
co
u
Q)
r/)
os:
Q)
...
C,)
o
"1:!
co
o
I
r--
.c
u
[IJ
'6
c
:J
>.
C,)
c::
CIl
Z
w
:E
<
z
. GundlachNancy
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 37 of 61
".~ u bject:
,cation:
Pre-app Request VA; Brent Forte, agent; Nancy Gundlach, Planner
Conference B
Start:
End:
Wed 12/1012008 1: 15 PM
Wed 12/10/20082:15 PM
Required Attendees:
(none)
Accepted
GundlachNancy; compagnone_d; JBF@SiteEnhancementServices.com; PodczerwinskyJohn
Recurrence:
Meeting Status:
Please note that this meeting is a conference call and will take place in Conference Room B.
Meeting Request Number: 5137
Meeting Type: preapplication
Requested By: Brent Forte on 1O-Nov-08
Phone: 888-276-6922 eMaH: JBF@SiteEnhancementServices.com
Representing: Red Roof Inn
Fa) io: 59715000508
Zonim~: C-4
SPD/SIP: 9385
Subject Type: Variance
Location: 1925 Davis Blvd Naples
Description: Red Rooflnn is applying for a sign variance to reface and reduce their current signage for the site above. We
are requesting to reface the fre.estanding sign and the directional on our property. We are requesting to allow the wall sign
~cated on the west elevation to be reduced and changed to just show Red Roofllln and take away the Suites protion. We
e requesting the wall sign on the south elevation to reduce size/reface and take away the lettering on the bottom of the
sign. We have completed this meeting over the phone last time for Value Place Hotels due to our firm being located in
South Bend, IN. I am asking if we could please get consideration due to the distance to conduct this meeting over the
phone again. Thank you very much.
1
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 38 of 61
Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR1103 - Official Receipt
Trans Number
872165
Date Post Date
12/12/2008 11 :08:57 AM 12/12/2008
Nbr
Appl Name: SITE ENHANCEMENT SERVICES
Appl Stage/Status: REVIEW STAGE NO. 1/PENDING
Address: BRENTE
Proj Name:
Type: TAZ: 126
Subdiv Nbr: 1164
Project Nbr: 2008120015
Payor: NORTH AMERICAN SIGNS
Fee Information
GL Account
13113832634127600000
Total
Amount Waived
$500.00
$500.00
Payments
Pa ment Code
CHECK
AccounUCheck Number
i 251655
Total Cash
Total Non-Cash
Amount
$500.00
$0.00 I
$500.00
$500.00 I
Total Paid
Memo:
Cashier/location: MURPHYLlNDA / 1
User: DANELLECARREL
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT
Printed:12/12/2008 11 :09:20 AM
s
s
-
-1ll:I'
"00
>,..
-1ll:I'
mC")
t-.CI)..J
C") --
N>U.
t-. as ..
~c=
&n-
NO.
cnm
"'Z
U)
~
~
~
Z
o
U)
~
5
w
u
Lf ~
~~~
w~c
~(ijz
U...JCJ
~wC.i5
U)a:a:
U.oo
OU.U.
<CWM~
U) W ,"
_CJ...,
Z~~~
CJwww
-zwm
cn9'? .
I
~
o ~
~z~
uQw
5~~
LL~"
=:"wC.i5
t\la:a:
LLOO
OLLLL
mwlOCD
,^ w w
"'CJCJ
Z2~~
CJwwlli
_zwcn
,ft 0 U) .
V" . .
iZ
LL~
00.
CJ)LL
we
CJ)CJ
N'~
-~
o~
~~
~~
CJ)LLU)
WCJ)Z
~ffi~
~~~~
I~W~
O...J w
a:WZc
wZ9z
a:~~S2
1-oa:CJ)
Cocoa::
xwu.o
. ...J"U.
O~wf3~
-~CJCJ
Z N'u.: ~ ~
-za:
CJ o~ ~ ~ ~CJ)
- OU)
en. ..
CJ) ...-
o CD
0.....
NO
-0
C'?-<t
NO)
Q)0l
em
-=;0.
.
co
u.
o
C\I
i
~...I~
SLJ..(/)
_ui'Z
I. ~ S2
-..... a. (/)
Qt'Cl
LS! ~
C'I) w
~ C\I ~
&~ ~
~
~
~
~
ffi
a:
~
Cl
~
~
z
o
~
u
o
--l
W
--l
i:i:
~
0-
~
w
a:
:J
~
~
;
~
~
~LL~,
O~~Q
:::t:I:~~
z!!! '~
J: C) LJ.. (~
OZ(/)~
.<a:(/)
~ .; ~ ~
<C2~a:
(/')Q.<CW
~
th~
~
z
o
'It, -
(/')
(!) :;:
~ LJ.J
Cl ~
~~
.~z
"eJ
:\J_
~(l)
~o.
-
LL
e-
00
II')
"'":
CO
o
,..
~
D.Z
it
0-
00
C\I
.....
&ri
M
C\I
~
co
u..
o
C')
j
~...J~
~u..CIJ
... . Z
- ~ Cl
'-'- Q. f1j
Q (\1 ~
ce~ Q
,,~ ~
&=It:~
Z 2
~ ~
g ~
~
~
~
c
~
~
~
~
W
It
:>
~
9
w
it
~
~
~u..~,
o~~~
~J:~_
z~ '~
OJ:~~12
., C3:: a: CIJ
e3 '; ~ ~
-' "'" c::: It
~ c: ~ w
tJ) ~
ILl
~~
Uj
-'
i::
2
CL
g~
.~;z
ffeJ
~!3
--,
w
u
~
o
a:
13
o
w
a:
~
N
..
~
o
w
a:
o
z
9
~
~
tI..
tI..
::;)
(J)
a:
~
2
a:
w
z
~
~
~
CD
~
::;)
(J)
~
~
~
a:
::It
::;)
z
:i
~
00
W
::J
0-
I- 0-
~o ~
CC~ cc
LLO W
Ww :>
OCC I- :>
Z ~/jj
~~ Zoo
o'I-~CC
I-oozzo
o~ooa:
~~fEU~
~u~gUl
~ c:( 0 CI) -0
..::a:I->,
Cl)F-.CI)~~
CCxJ:[jOO
~w F-. f2 u ::J
z~~5
o ..
.
~
z
co
LL
o
V
~
~
~
::It
::;)
z
~
I
r
~
L
CI)
Z
cc
;:)
I-
W
CC
~
U
~
o CQ~
I-W Wu
~ ~~
zffl~~~
9~u::Ew
· Z u.: c:( ;:) !:::
<C CQz-,
Qo~-w
LL..:JCC"""~~
CJ)>-:::::>:::::>w
""iu~ct..,
0::E.~
~~3~u
....wct'c:( .~
Uco~xCQ
<(,....0. .
u.:N .ll')..-
. . . .
@=
......
=-!
S..J~
~LL(/J
... . z
- 81 ~
\...L.. 0. (/J
Q lU ~
L8~ Q
,.... ffi
~ gJ i
&~ ~
a:
~
~
l
2
o
f=
<t:
u
o
-l
W
-l
i:i:
2
a..
l
0.
~
a:
UJ
~
o
~
~
-....-
2
o
~ -
(,/)
o :>
3: l.l.J
o 0:
~
It?
f.,.
L
ll')
..-
I ~
..-
II G: (,/)
0 W
-l
CJ) <t:
~ -' (,/)
... ~
0
en I-
11% ~ -,(: ~
1l~/~ 9-,V ~
mm
0....
Oz
itJ
.\J_
~tn
-=;0...
-.
-
u.
a
C/)
CD
o::t
N
N
CI)
I-
Z
.,..;
u.
ti-
C/)
~
o::t
C"')
.
,...
.....
.t
~
~==
t:5=
~
CJ)
~
.~ ~.,9
co
LL
o
ll')
I
S-'~
SLL(/J
_ en Z
I. .9! ~
'""'- 0. r/)
QlU
^q~ ~
'-lit ,.... ffi
~ &l i
&~ ~
~
~
6
Z
~
0.
~
w
ffi
It
5
w
II:
c(
~
~
::E
w
II:
:l
~
::E
9
w
u:
~
~
z co Z
~LLq.
o~~o
::iJ:~~
z!!:! .r/)
J: C!) LL Z
OZ~!.2
.., <C (/J
~ .. ~
-l .: f- Q
<t: :i: 0:: cc
(,/) a.. <t: UJ
~
'I
~~
2
o
~
u
o
-l
W
-l
u:
2
a..
2
o
'II: -
(,/)
o :>
3: w
o 0:
mal
0\0
.~z
M~
0.1_
~0
-=;0...
lIJ
f- <!:
ffi ~
~ ffi ~ffi
!5 ;! effi
z a: z~
~ ~ ~u;
t
N
>l..-
r 't-s co
~
~
i=-=
Co LL
in 0
Clj> CJ)
C? -'
l ~
0
~
c-!t-..~ .all 6
Ilt/~ C:G
1l8h O~ -,v
1l~/~O-,9
~
~
Z
co
LL
o
,....
g~
Oz
)0
.\J_
~fI)
-=;0...
-
LL
d-
en
cq
I.t')
0)
it
CT
en
co
iii
0)
~
z
s-'~
~LL(/J
... . z
- 81 !.2
\.a... 0. r/)
Q lU i
~~ ~
,.... UJ
~ gJ i
&~ ~
a:
~
~
~
~
I
2
o
~
u
o
-l
w
~
~
~
w
~
w
~
~
9
~
~
~
~LL~,
a:U.N.
O:::::>"!Q
::iJ:~~
z!!:! '~
J: C!) u. ~
QZCJ)
-,<ca::
~ .: ~ ~
-l :2 0:: cc
<t: Cl.. <t: W
(,/) ~
.~
~i
W
-l
i:i:
:2
a..
2
o
'II: V;
o :>
3: l.l.J
o 0:::
g~
.0..,
0.1....
M\tift
0.1 'iifJ
(1)-
~~
rr
; =r
CO fa
lb
w
UJ tI..
~ a:
t;
tu li:i I-
Z z ffi
~ ~ u
~
0 ::i w
z ::;) u
i= z if
(J) :i z
~ ~ ~
0
:n
t=
F
III
I ~
..J t::
~ a:
~ a;a
u ~
~ z
if 9
ffi (I)
tI.. 0
o ~
1 t .'He-L
11011
1l~/~ G"IS
liS/ L (:",0 ~
119-, ~ ~
~ ~
o alS
w' 0
G s.:::i ~ I-
~ g~ ~ ffl~
~ ~~~ ~ ~R:
i: w wo(l- P::: tu~
1IJ ~ GO~ ~ za:
~Zu.: g~o w. ~-w
IIl(Z::l! ....CIJW !:::~ 3:
u.: ~ alSZZ !a~ 0
.... _ C1Ju.-~ ...!.z:::la..
-::l! .-- ?:Ci-a:
6 :::l ffi~~ffl~~J:~
a: ~ t:a..u..:uu.:::ll-g;
ti Offl~QalS~ZI-~~
a: wu ~w ~~a::::l
. a:~m .gtu~(!}~o
'z~l-zd,w~ZCl)~CI)g
CD :t:WZzw OCl)_.c
lCQ.CI)~o(a:U w.z~
. _mJ::::l< a:.Q
'j. LL.~o(c')l-u..:owXI-
,.. uww....wa:axi
,.. W(!}ua:<:t::::l~ CIJ
N a:%~woCl)~ 0
"-' 0.._ I-WZ~~=!W
~ ~~~U$~l:i;;!~
~ .. Gl<;> ~ ~ fa 02 IT! ~
. ._-?w
<(0)..--
I'-oc.o
"..__ 0 \+-
"'\10
"I'-
.~~
Qi(l)(])
::::CCJ)
ro::lro
,,-'0...
c
(])
CJ)
<(
;
~J
. ~~
~! ;! i . ~" h~o
~,~.._ .'~-,is · J~'.ilI1i~
" ~ . ; '.~~:.'~
.. ..' · :i~!-::~i
;~i ~~~~ ! ~'~f~i~
I;~ Ci; ~~ I di~~~~;
" h~ ~.o~ .~" t..;~~~~
. !F~~ il~il ~t
~ ~~~ i"'. . ~~ ~;~::'5'
~i .,":i I' ~r" ~i"'~, ~,~~.,.
ih"' \I · ".. ~8 .~~
,,;f~ .. ~ ~.'t ~S' ..
~ ~~.. '~f ~.~~~ ~~~-
. !a~! !~~i~ ~~:~ ,f"
~...!li... "E~;l ~
i ~
LL~ ~
~ I~' t
:!. ~I ~ !It
: ::-"i ~
~n~~i' i
". ~
. ' . .
~ ! ~. ~
* @:.... , ~ ~
.,; l' !~~ ~""
~:~~ ~~~~
.~,;ili; ';
j1~~:; CJ~. ~i1fli
I_
i.
n
Ii
if
Ii
Lt.
~8
..- 0
1-~"1I ~-
l..o.~'~"
-
<c
~~h
Ii,'
~ ~~
I~ ~ !
h'..i t
I Q 1i
J
· J II
, l!iJ
hE
~n!
~ ~ ~~
Ii; e ~~
\'!it- h,~
~ _. ~1~
g ~ i~~
l:Io ~...~
! ~ ~e;'
u ~ Ui~i
~ ~. ~t~
I
I
!
II
.. ,. I
:r:
,t ~
;.~
~
!
; .-
.
ki
. "
i
~. . _ l'
=:.Wl,I'-~1 u':"~~-.'\"J'
. ~u~ . I~J
i i~i~'1 .1~
L~~
..,p;,~c.... s
~~
Agenda Item No. 7A
June 23, 2009
Page 48 of 61
RESOLUTION 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION
NUMBER SV-2009-AR-14140, GRANTING FOUR (4) SIGN
VARIANCES; VARIANCE ONE IS FROM LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION S.06.04.C.l TO ALLOW
AN ON-PREMISES SIGN LOCATED LESS THAN 1,000 FEET
FROM ANOTHER SIGN; THE SECOND VARIANCE IS FROM
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION S.06.04.C.1.a TO
ALLOW A 23-FOOT mGH ON-PREMISES SIGN; THE THIRD
VARIANCE IS FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SUBSECTION S.06.04.C.1.c TO ALLOW A SIGN AREA OF 96:t:
FEET; AND THE FOURTH VARIANCE BEING FROM LDC
SUBSECTION 5.06.04.C.4, TO ALLOW A SECOND WALL SIGN;
ALL VARIANCES FOR THE RED ROOF INN, WHICH IS
LOCATED AT 1925 DAVIS BOULEVARD IN SECTION 2,
TOWNSIDP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner now owns and operates the property located at 1925 Davis
Boulevard in Collier County, Florida and seeks to alter the signage on the property; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner wishes to have signs with less than 1,000 feet of separation for
on-premises signs; and
\VHEREAS, without a variance, Petitioner cannot have on-premises signs within 1,000
feet of each other pursuant to LDC Section 5.06.04.C.l; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner wishes to have a sign of23 feet in height; and
WHEREAS, without a variance, Petitioner cannot have a sign in excess of 15 feet in
height, pursuant to LDC Section 5.06.04.C.l.a; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner wishes to have a sign with an area of96:1: square feet; and
lof3
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 49 of 61
WHEREAS, without a variance, Petitioner cannot have a sign in excess of 80 square feet,
pursuant to LDC section 5.06.04.C.l.c; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner wishes to have a second wall sign on a three story building; and
WHEREAS, without a variance, Petitioner is entitled to only one wall sign on its building
pursuant to 5.06.045.C.4; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board) has held a public hearing with due
notice made, and has considered the advisability of granting these variances; and
WHEREAS, the Board has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and
arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by the Land
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board hereby approves four variances from LDC
Sections 5.06.04.C.l, 5.06.04.C.1.a, 5.06.04.C.1.c and 5.06.04.C.4, subject to the Conditions of
Approval in Exhibit B, as requested in Petition SV-2009-AR-14140 filed by Brent Forte of Site
Development Services, Inc., on behalf of the Petitioner, Red Roof Inn, concerning the subject
property at 1925 Davis Boulevard in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East in Collier
County, Florida.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number SV-
2009-AR-14140 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motio~ second and super-majority vote, this _ day of
, 2009.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
DONNA FIALA, Chairman
20f3
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 50 of 61
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
STEVEN T. WILLIAMS ~J .0....
Assistant County Attorney" ,.t
Attachments: Exhibit A - Sign and Site Depictions
Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval
CP\09-CPS-00925\22
Rev. 5/11109
30f3
s
s
-
a
QZ
Ql
= z
~g
en u.>-
~ 00.
CJ)u.
~ /jja
0 CJ)e!)
~ -z
N_
-~
Z O~
0 ~~
en
CC en -0:
~ 0: ::oCl)
.~ LU CJ)LLZ
~ LUCJ)O ex:>
"Co Ucc_
~W~ ......
>'r"'" I- ~~~~ 0
-~ ::J I-
alC"') W :::::> ,-
0 en LI;-'Lrl~
u -' Q)
I'cn..J iE I- - oirlzLIJ
~ :::::>z~ a::ZQCl C)
C"') .- inz~ oQw I:uZ..:.JZ co
N>u.. ve '""'~o cc<C>-eJ a..
I' (\1 '" 0- ::i>z -J:0..(7)
W~Cl ~ ex:
=It:C~ U.LUeJ I U 0:
::.::::>Z -'- 0;)000 <(
OWe!) ~wen XWLLLL
~-'- Na:a: l-
an- J-:wen =-'1'-
NQ. LLOO otwffi~
ena::cc OU.LL to
mea ILea al t:i It) ~ "-~e!)e!) :c
'r"'"Z OLLU. Z gu.: [f [f
<C tu CO) ;:; CJ)We!) ><
_e!) CJ 0 ~ lli ill
en~e!) Z c.~ ~ w
Z2~~ CJLULUW -~oenCJ)
zww en. ..
CJWWW - 0 CJ) CJ)
-Zwm en...
en'?~ .
s::
C)
en
c ca
s::
C) 0
en ;:
(,)
C) Q)
c '-
:0 Q
c Z
lU
- Z
l/)
(I) '0
Q)
'- 0
LI.. IX:
a.. W"C
CO C <U
c:t: C)IX:
tn en
en
co 0
u.. 8
0 I{)
C\J rf,
0) .-
OeD
0,- ~..J ~
. 0.1 0
"N SLL(/J
~L() _ (1)- z
(!) (!) \..a.... (I) CJ
cO) O~1ii
:::lctl
-,0... z Z
&1 ~
~~ ffi
N ~
t- <(
t:::il '**' I
~
Z 0
Z
~ ~
<t:
u g
0
-J Z
W
~
D-
r-
Z
w
I!
W
ll.
to ll.
...... 0
0 w
N ~
Q) ~
0> I
ro ,
c..
L
<( W
~
I- w
I!
CO :J
(f)
::I: ~
>< ~
UJ 0
..J
W
L [
>-
Z
<(
W
r-
z co 0
o Z
<( u. N'
a:: u..
0 :::l "! 0
:2 J: C\J ;?;
Z LU I (f)
J: a u.. Z
0 z en CJ
-:l <C c: 1ii
Vi z
<(
w..: ()
l-
<t: :2 a: a:
fJ1 0- <( W
~
= <(
~ I
r-
.e'- I!
~c.cr.I 0
~CZl= Z
=5,~ r-
'T"
==cr.I
~ ~
0
()
.;C
0)..-
-~~
)~
_"\J~
(I) v,#
C:ro
-=;0...
~
u.
d-
C/)
r.n
....
!
....
.
-
U-
ti-
C/)
N
"":
r.n
C"')
N
<C
c
en
en
co
LL
o
Cf)
I
~..J~
St.Lr/)
_ui"Z
I. ~!2
~o.(/J
2~~
Q.7 ~ ffi
~~ ~
&~ ~
o
z
~
6
Z
~
Q.
~
W
a:
w
u.
u.
15
w
~
~
~
UJ
2
w
II:
~
2
9
UJ
u:
~
2:
o
~
u
9
CX)
-
o
cry
Cl)
0>
ctl
a..
<(
t-
ea
I
><
UJ
...
~
o
~LL~~
a::LLC\I .
O:::::>C\!()
~J:;::!~
Z w,(/)
J:ffiLLZ
Qzen!:1
.<(0::(1)
Vi ~
l.l.J .: ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ffi
e ~
! ~
.c~'E: = ~
me t
eir !:1
~~
O)~
gz
'0.1
6~
~UJ
Ceo
-=;0...
~
:::E
a:
t-
r
r
L
r
.
~
It)
.
;:....
L
uJ
(,)
if
o
a:
~
(,)
o
w
a:
9
co
"-
N
GO)
o
~
o
w
a:
C!)
z
9
~
(J)
~
tI..
tI..
:;)
(J)
~
tI..
a:
w
z
W
I-
~
~
CD
~
:5
(J)
~
z
a:
:;)
tii
a:
:::E
::;)
z
3
::;)
..J
<
10
.-
cO
o
t:
o
en
..J
~
o
~
(J)
w
:J
a.
I- a.
Zo :::::>
lfl- ~
LLO W
Ww :=
a::l- 0
Oz l-
I-- o..w
Cl)cf. ~CJ)
O'I-~CC
~(J)zzQ
o?;cOocc
~:::ftOWS
ZWWO
:::::>ua:~
~ c:( 0 CI) -0
..::;0:1->::
Cl)F-.CI)~~
CCxJ:wCl)
W~F-.f20::::;
Z<C~-'
O:E . :;>_
.
(J)
z
CC
::>
tu
a:
5 <(
:5 a. a,
co <c ._
w () CI)
(!J ~:E
6~~~~
-'OU:Ew
ZLt<C:::::>!:::
<C coz-,
OO:E-W
u..:Jg::::::>~:s:
(J)"z..JW
~-V'-<C-'
~O:Ea ~
I-W3ou
::::;a:<e~S
W9M~CQ
w~~co= =
Zu..;N<;'':',,;"
. .
@=
=-!!!
...
co
LL
o
<:t
~
~
~
:::E
::l
Z
3
:3
<
I
.'V~tt~t-"Bt~
,,'''/& ~ -.G ~
,,~/~ g-,t ~
-'
~
W
Q
c:
w=
~~
~ II
..J~
w~
W
-'
(S
Oen
~-'W
SLLrfj
_ en Z
I.. ..!!! ~
'""'- c. (/)
c)"'
&~ ~
,.... CC
M W
~N ~
&~ ~
II:
o
Z
~
1=
o
Z
~
a.
I-
Z
UJ
a:
UJ
u..
u..
5
w
~
~
...
z
o
~
u
o
-l
co
-
o
V
CD
0>
CO
c..
<(
I-
00
I
><
UJ
LLl
:2:
UJ
CC
:l
~
:2:
9
UJ
u:
~
L..
Iii
b
z co Z
<ell-C!,
a: LL N ,
o:::::>c\!u
:2J:~6
Z W . rfj
J:(;u.Z
ozenQ
"""'J<t:CCrfj
U) ~
W .: ~ ~
-l:2C1::1I:
<t: a.. c:t UJ
(,/) ~
! ~
.cc: = 0
f~& ~
=~'=
==-
~
ID
S:z
'~f2
'~CD
t::ro
-=;0...
Ii
ti-
C/)
CD
<:t
N
N
;..
Ii
C'"
C/)
~
<:t
M
~
ct~a
~ =
~
.~~-9
OJ
c
Cl
en
co
LL
o
Lt)
~
S-'~
~LL(fJ
... "Z
- ~ Cl
\.a.... a. 1i)
Q t\l ~
d3~ Q
,.... CC
C"') W
~N ~
&~ ~
~
~
5
Z
UJ
~
n..
~
UJ
II:
W
It
5
w
~
~
z
o
~
u
g
co
'0
LO
Q)
C)
CO
a.
~
Z
UJ
~
II:
::>
~
~
~
u:
>-
~
Iii
b
~ LL ~ :;:
a:: u.. N .
o ::l "! t)
~J:~~
Z w,(/)
J:<5LLZ
OZCl)~
-,<ca::(/J
Sj ~
...J a:
~ UJ
= ~
! ~
.c't = 0
+:1== Z
! 8.iP ~
=== ~
~~
~
I-
CO
:c
><
UJ
t..
to
0) ..--
.~
(V)%
~
Ceo
-=;0...
~
Ii: Cij
~ 0(1)
~ a: ~ ffi
I- ~ Oz
::l ~ ~t!!
z en o~
~ N Zu..
(I)
5
~
a..
o
(.)
u.
t
N
-l..-
r
'fs-s
"Bll6
CI~"V(:
"v~ GG----.:t
,,8/~ 0 ~ -,V
,,%0-.9
co
LL
o
co
::I
~
co
~
gj
Ii
a
CJ)
-'
~
~
00
1.0-
0
m <.0
c QJ
C) C)
en co
CL
...
<C ~
w
l- II:
:l
CO ~
:c ~
>< 9
UJ w
u:
~
o
0) ..-
gz
.~
-'~
em
-=;0...
it
d-
en
CO
~
~
D..Z
it
d-
en
co
ui
0)
/-"-
(J
c
en
Ci5
CD
U.
o
,....
I
~-'~
SLLr/)
_ u) Z
I. CD (!l
Cs" g. 1i)
^q~ ~
1.& ,.... CC
:3 C"') W
N ~
Q{[;j; ~
o
z
~
6
z
w
~
0.
~
W
a:
UJ
LL
LL
5
w
~
~
~
W
~
UJ
a:
::l
~
~
9
w
u:
z
o
~
u
o
-l
co
-
o
I"-
(])
0>
('0
c..
<(
to-
c:l
J:
><
W
~
~
~
Z co Z
<CLL.C!,
ct:LL.C\J.
0:::::>C\!()
:2J:~~
z!!:! I rn
:I:C)u.z
ozenC!)
J<CCC1i)
5
a:
w
i ~
~
-a=! ~
5 5iP ~
==" ~
~.~
cij
w ..
-l .: f-
<t:::;Ee:::
(,/)Cl..<:(
O)SJ
O'~
02
0.1
fj'~ (J) C!l
a: z
~fl) w w is
w tI.. ~ ::l
::J co u a: I-
-,0... ~ I- W
(J) --I I-
li:i .... w a: (J)
tu z z CD a:
z w ~ ~ (J) w
z ~ 0 w z
ffi 0 :I: ::J w
< U <( U ....
U. tI.. (J)
0 :::E w w ~ tI.. ~
C!l ::;) 0 0 ::l
Z Z ~ ~ 9 (J) 0 ~
i= ~ z a: ~
(J) Z en w CD
~ ::l W W 0 3: u ~
..J n. tI.. ~
< 0 0 w 0 5
a: tI.. w (J)
:n
t=
~
In
rr
~ ~
CoCo
lb
1 t .'HE -L .0'
,,~/~ C:"IS
..aIL G-m
,,9-,~ ~
cc~
~<C
wo
a: en
o ~
I- ~
@ , u.. 0
:r:.::E 0 ~C/)
~ ~ G~ ~ w~
~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ::'::00 ~ za:
f/) <( Uwl- w-ffiW
W 1.1: OIO ,=Z<(3:
o :2: ;;t:CIJW a:~uo
if :> ~zz D?z::>D..
.... ~ C1JU::~ x-a:~
_o~ a:wCl)CIJWw:r:....
'to::> wa:~wii~l-a:
~....;tC/)~~~~z~@5
.... ow....Sfw <::]9;::>
~ ~~...IC!0C!)lii903:g
. u:w, zClJZCIJ"",
"i OI-ZClJUJffiow-"'"
Co ~UJzzw<(w.zz
lCQ.~~f~~~()wa::x::gC3
. Z U....I.I:O U<t:...I
~=U::C3wUJI-W~i=ZCIJ
,....0, Ua:<I....CIJ-O
,.... UJC!)<wo~~>-::2:w
~ g:~u.;,=w~~UJ3CIJ
_ .l-zI::Eu.m::'::...I9
o g~~3:::Ewo:>gO()
;;: oXo'wcc wZ
j:.. f/) .' UJ . ':' I D.. 0 ~ ...I W
. .
@~
:::>1;;
-
....
co
L1.
o
co
I
()
c:
Cl
en
~..J~
S u.. (/J
_ (J) Z
\.a....9! Cl
a ~ii)
LS~ ~
,.... cc
~~ ~
&lii:~
~
o
Z
~
5
z
UJ
C/)
~
D..
~
w
II:
w
u.
u.
5
w
~
~
....
z
o
~
u
o
-l
co
14-
o
co
Q)
0>
co
a..
<(
r-
ea
J:
><
UJ
UI
:2:
UJ
a:
:l
~
:2:
9
w
u:
~
'-
ti.i
5
~LL~Z
a:: u. t\i
O:::::>C\I(j
::?: J: ~ ~
Z a'(/)
6 z ~ ~
., <t: a:: 1ii
~
if
UJ
C ~
..c: ! ~
~c:= 0
c.CDC Z
=59 t;:
===
~8
Vi
w
~ ~ ~
(,/) 0.. c:(
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 59 of 61
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
FOR
SV-2009-AR-14140
1. The existing directional sign (Sign E shown on Exhibit A page 2 of 8) for the Red Roof Inn
located at the eastern entrance on Davis Boulevard shall be removed.
EXHIBIT B
.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 60 of 61
BROOKSIDE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
April 12, 2009
Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP
Collier County
Community Development &
Environmental Services Division
Zoning & Land Development Review
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Re: Red Roof Inn Sign Variances
Dear Ms. Gundlach,
At the March 30, 2009 meeting of the Naples Brookside Homeowner's Association,
discussion took place regarding your letter dated March 27, 2009 describing the
requested Red Roof Inn sign variances. A motion was made and unanimously approved
which opposes the variances requested by Red Roof Inn.
Brookside residents are already victims to extraordinary lighting and signage from Davis
Boulevard establishments. More exposure from the increase in height, density and size
of signs on Davis Boulevard would further negatively impact the nuisance.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
/Sincerely, /,
/" ",7) . " / Jj, ()
(,.~J~
j--catherine C. Haworth
Secretary
1980 Harbor Lane
Naples, Florida 34104
REeF" ~I"\
. \''\'j ",,"(mg.~
At"!',
Agenda Item NO.7 A
June 23, 2009
Page 61 of 61
NOTicE OF. PUBLIC HEARING_
Notice Is hereby given that the Board of, counfY-
Commissioners, as the BOard of Zoning Appeals, of",:
Collier CountY will hold a public hearing on Tues~
day, June g, l!009, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Ad.'
ministration BUilding, Collier County, Govemment
Center. 3301 East Tamiami Trail; Naples, Florida.
The mfi!eting will b~gln at 9:00 A.M..The title of , the
proposed resolution Is as fC)lIoVlls:,,"" , " '
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETI-
TION NUMBER SV-2009-AR-14140. GRAWTING FOUR
(4) SIGN VARIANCES; VARIANCE ONE IS FROM LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION S.06.04.C.1 TOAl-
LOW AN oN-PREMISES 'SIGN lOCATED lESS THAN .
1,000 FEET FROM ANOTHER SIGN; THE SECOND VARI-
ANCE IS FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSEC.
TION5.06;04.C.1.a TO ALLOW A 23-FOOT HIGH ON-
PREMISIS SIGN; THE THIRD VARIANCE IS FROM LAND'
DEVELOPMENT CODE SUBSECTION 5.06.04.C.1.c TO
ALLOW A SIGN AREA OF 96 +/- FEET: AND THE
FOURTH VARIANCE BEING FROM LDC SUBSECTION
5.06.04.C.4, TO AllOW A,SECOND WALl' SIGN:,ALl
VARIANCES FOR THE RED ROOF INN. WHICH IS lO.
CATED AT 1925 DAVIS BOULEVARD IN SECTION 2,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH" RANGE ,25 EAST. COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Petition:, SV-2009-AR-14140, Red Roof Inn, repre-
sented by Brent Forte of Site' Enhancement Servo
ices, Inc., is requesting four Siqn Variances from
LDC SectIon 5.06.04. The' first variance is from Sub-
section S.06.04.C.l which, requires a minimum sepa-
ration of 1,OOO-foot between signs to allow 262 +/_
feet between signs. ;The seconl:l variance /s from
Subsection 5.06.04.C.1.a which allows a IS.foot high
sign to allow a 23-foot high Sign. The third variance
is from Subsection 5.06.04.'C.l.c which allows a sign
area of 80 square feet to allow a sign area of 96 +/_
square feet. The fourth variance is from Subsection
5.06.04.C.4 which permits one wall sign t;) allow an
additional wall sign. The subject property is located
at 1925 Davis Boulevard\ in Section, 2, Township 50
Sout~. Range 2S East, Collier County, Florida.
NOTE; All Persons wishing to speak-on any agenda
item must register with,' the CountY Administrator
prior to presentation of the agenda Item to be ad,
dressed. Individual speakers, will be limite'd to 3
minutes on any item. The selection of an Individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group Is
encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokes-
person for a group or or~anization maybe allotted
10 minutes to speak on an Item. ,', "
Persons wiShing to have written or graphic materi-
als included in the Board agenda packets must
submit said material' a minimum of 3 weeks prtorto
the respective public hearing. in any case. written
materials intended to be considered by the Board
shall be submitted to the appropriate CountY staff
a minimum of seven days prior to the public hear-
ing. All material used In presentations before the
Board will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the '
Board will need a record of the proceedings per-
taining thereto and therefore. may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the Ilroceedings, Is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any
accommodation In order to partlcipate,fn this pro-
ceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the
provision of certain assistance. Please contact the'
Collier County Facilities, Management Department,
located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East. Building W,-
Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted tis.
tening devices for the hearing impaired are ava/I- 1
able in the County Commissioners' Office. '
I
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
DONNA FIALA. CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Teresa Polaski. Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)""",:,',"
Mav24 '
"
N~ 179Rq~l