Agenda 05/14/2019 Item #16A 2 (RESTORE Spill Impact Component Grant Application)05/14/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to provide after-the-fact approval for the submittal of a RESTORE Spill Impact
Component (Pot 3) grant application to the Gulf Consortium for hydrologic, vegetative and water
quality monitoring as part of the Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan in
the amount of $725,760.
OBJECTIVE: To receive after-the-fact approval from the Board of County Commissioners to submit a
RESTORE Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) grant application to the Gulf Consortium to fund hydrologic,
vegetative and water quality monitoring as part of the Collier County Watershed Improvement Plan.
Collier County CMA #5330 Grant Coordination requires that the Board of County Commissioners
approve all grant applications.
CONSIDERATION: The Gulf Consortium provides grants through the RESTORE Spill Impact
Component to eligible counties to implement projects identified in the Florida State Expenditure Plan
(SEP). The Collier County Watershed Improvement Plan is listed in the SEP and is eligibl e to receive
approximately $12,000,000 over a 15-year period of time to implement the Collier County Watershed
Improvement Plan. The grant application was submitted on 3/29/2019.
Collier County CMA No. 5330 authorizes the County Manager to approve the submittal of grant
applications with subsequent Board of County Commissioners action at the next available Board meeting
to ratify the approval as “after-the-fact.”
FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of the monitoring is estimated to be $725,760. Should the grant be
awarded, Collier County will receive RESTORE Spill Impact Component funding in the amount of
$725,760. There is no match required.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote
for approval. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To provide after-the-fact approval for the submittal of a RESTORE Spill
Impact Component grant application to the Gulf Consortium for the hydrologic and vegetative monitoring
as part of the Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Plan in the amount of $725,760.
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees
and Program Management Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. CM MEMO 2019 03-27 ATF19-006 GC(PDF)
2. Application SEP RESTORE (PDF)
16.A.2
Packet Pg. 528
05/14/2019
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.A.2
Doc ID: 8527
Item Summary: Recommendation to provide after-the-fact approval for the submittal of a
RESTORE Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) grant application to the Gulf Consortium for hydrologic,
vegetative and water quality monitoring as part of the Collier County Comprehensive Watershed
Improvement Plan in the amount of $725,760.
Meeting Date: 05/14/2019
Prepared by:
Title: – Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management
Name: Mindy Collier
04/03/2019 8:41 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - IF, CPP & PM – Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program
Management
Name: Amy Patterson
04/03/2019 8:41 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Zoning Gary McAlpin Additional Reviewer Completed 04/03/2019 1:08 PM
Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 04/04/2019 11:34 AM
Growth Management Operations Support Heather Meyer Additional Reviewer Completed 04/08/2019 10:32 AM
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Amy Patterson Additional Reviewer Completed 04/16/2019 8:51 AM
Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 04/16/2019 11:40 AM
County Attorney's Office Colleen Greene Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 04/16/2019 1:34 PM
Grants Erica Robinson Level 2 Grants Review Completed 04/16/2019 5:08 PM
Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 04/17/2019 8:19 AM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 04/17/2019 8:56 AM
Budget and Management Office Ed Finn Additional Reviewer Completed 04/17/2019 9:11 AM
Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Completed 05/03/2019 3:34 PM
County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 05/05/2019 8:30 PM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 05/14/2019 9:00 AM
16.A.2
Packet Pg. 529
16.A.2.aPacket Pg. 530Attachment: CM MEMO 2019 03-27 ATF19-006 GC (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
1
COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PLAN MONITORING PROGRAM
NARRATVIE
The Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan (CCCWIP) is a series of linked surface
water management projects on approximately 10,000 acres of eastern Collier County, Florida with the
objectives of restoring the hydrology and ecology of both Naples Bay and Rookery Bay, as well as the
hydrologic restoration of the southern Belle Meade area of the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF). The
goal of the CCCWIP is to divert water from entering Naples Bay, which is impacted by a freshwater
surplus during wet season, by creating a flow-way from the Golden Gate Canal structure through the
PSSF to Rookery Bay, which has a freshwater deficit. Collier County is proposing to continue a
monitoring program within the project area to determine the progress and success of the hydrologic
restoration and to monitor water quality of flows entering Naples and Rookery Bays.
Project Title: State Expenditure Plan Project #22-1: Collier County Comprehensive Watershed
Improvement Plan - Monitoring Program
Methodology/Approach: The monitoring program implements a before-after-control-impact (BACI)
design that will quantify baseline (pre-construction) and will be compared to with-project (after
construction) vegetation and surface water conditions. (National Academies of Science, Engineering, and
Medicine 2017 – Effective Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico). The
metric to be used to measure outcome will be PRM006, “Monitoring - # sties being monitored.”
Monitoring well and equipment installation is underway and pre-implementation baseline monitoring is
scheduled to take place through calendar year 2019 under a separate Federal grant award (RESTORE
Direct Component funds). This proposal is requesting funding to continue monitoring as needed for
baseline data and implement post-construction monitoring.
The monitoring program implements a before-after-control-impact (BACI) design that will quantify
baseline (pre-construction) and will be compared to with-project (after construction) vegetation and
surface water conditions. (National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine 2017 – Effective
Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico). Sampling will occur at sixty (60)
shallow groundwater monitoring wells located outside (control locations) and within (impact locations)
of the area of potential project influence. See Exhibit I. Monitoring wells will be placed in as diverse a
selection of existing vegetative communities as possible. Each monitoring well will be equipped with a
HOBO MX2001-04 water level data logger that will record water levels and barometric pressure at least
twice daily. On a quarterly basis, water level data will be downloaded, saved in raw data and
spreadsheet formats, and summarized in graphs. Rainfall data will be obtained from the same stations
used in the surface water-ground water modeling effort or obtained from appropriate stations reported
in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online (CDO) for
correlations to surface water and ground water elevations.
Samples for lab analysis of water quality will be collected on a quarterly basis for twenty (20) of the
monitoring wells. If the surface water depth is greater than 15cm (6 inches) at any of the well locations,
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
2
a surface water sample will also be collected for lab analysis. Sampling will be conducted in accordance
with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) F.A.C 62-160.110, FS 2100 for surface water sampling and FS 2200 for groundwater sampling.
Collier County has been coordinating the design of the monitoring program with several local, state and
federal agencies to reduce sampling redundancies and ensure data consistency and usability. (National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2017. Effective Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological
Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico, Washington DC. The National Academies Press.) These agencies
include the Florida Forestry Service (FFS), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The CCCWIP project area is bordered to the east by the
SFWMD Picayune Strand Restoration project and the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)
which is administered by the USACE and SFWMD. Below is a table of agencies involved and their roles
and responsibilities within the project.
Organization/Agency/Company Role Duties
Collier County Board of County
Commissioners – Coastal Zone
Management
Gulf Consortium Subrecipient Prepare application, project oversight,
prepare and submit monitoring reports
to Gulf Consortium
U. S. Treasury Department RESTORE Act Co-Funder Additional funds provided under Direct
Component
Florida Forestry Service Partner and land owner Provide input on monitoring well
locations and access within Picayune
Strand State Forest.
Rookery Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve
Partner Provide input on monitoring locations
and access within the Reserve.
Florida Department of
Environmental Protection
Partner Construction oversight, permitting
assistance
(Unknown) Contractor Monitoring
Location: Collier County encompasses over 2,300 square miles and is located on the Gulf of Mexico in
southwestern Florida. The project is located on approximately 10,000 acres of Eastern Collier County.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
3
Program Duration: The monitoring program, initiated with Pot 1 funds (see Leveraged Funds) started in
2019 to establish pre-construction, baseline data. This proposal is requesting funds to continue baseline
data collection during 2020, enable spot monitoring and maintenance as needed during construction
and fund 3 years of post-construction monitoring (TBD). The anticipated state date will be based upon
award of this initial SEP grant award.
Approach:
Hydrologic monitoring: Sixty (60) shallow groundwater monitoring wells will be installed within and
outside the area of potential project influence (see Exhibit 1 for well locations). Monitoring wells will be
placed in as diverse a selection of existing vegetation communities as possible. Each monitoring well will
be equipped with a HOBO MX2001-04 water level data logger that will record water levels and
barometric pressure at least twice daily. On a quarterly basis, water level data will be downloaded,
saved in raw data and spreadsheet formats, and summarized in graphs. Rainfall data will be obtained
from the same stations used in the surface water – ground water modeling effort or obtained from
appropriate stations reported in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate
Data Online (CDO) for correlations to surface water and ground water elevations. At each quarterly
download event, the wells will be inspected and appropriately maintained. Data compilation will include
spreadsheets, exhibits, tables and analysis reporting.
Well Installation Methodology
At each well location, soil borings were conducted utilizing a mechanical auger, a hand auger, or a
combination of the two in order to reach a target depth of 4 feet below grade surface (bgs). Once the
target depth was achieved a screened portion of PVC, with a well point, was placed into the boring hole.
Clean gravel was poured around the screened portion of the PVC to alleviate silt/fine sediment build up
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
4
around the screen. A solid PVC riser is attached to the screened portion of PVC to achieve an elevation
of approximately 3 feet above grade surface (ags). The HOBO MX2001-04 water level data logger will be
placed within the well, suspended just above the bottom of the well. A cap equipped with a combination
lock was placed on top of the riser portion of the PVC for protection. The well locations, natural ground
level elevation, and top of pipe elevations will be surveyed by a Florida licensed surveyor. See Exhibit 2
for well installation cross section\data form.
Water Quality Monitoring: The primary objective of the water quality monitoring is to assess project-
related changes in total nitrogen and total phosphorus. The data will allow assessment of these changes
in the project area and Rookery Bay receiving waters within the overall project footprint. Samples
collected at the inflow and outflow ends of the project will provide the data to assess inflow and outflow
nutrient concentration differences. Samples collected within the project area will allow assessment of
any differences in nutrient levels within and outside the project area of influence.
Samples for lab analysis of water quality will be collected on a quarterly basis from twenty (20) of the
monitoring wells (See Exhibit 1 - monitoring wells where lab analyzed water sampling will take place are
showing in blue). If the surface water depth is greater than 15 cm (6 inches) at any of the well locations,
a surface water sample will also be collected for lab analysis. Sampling will be conducted in accordance
with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) F.A.C 62-160.110, FS 2100 for surface water sampling and FS 2200 for groundwater sampling. All
water samples will be properly labeled in laboratory provided sample bottles, stored on ice in a cooler,
and sent to a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) certified laboratory.
Sampling Parameters
Field Sampling Parameters (taken at all wells)
• Water temperature
• pH
• Dissolved Oxygen
• Specific conductance (as the basis for salinity calculation)
Well and/or Surface Water* Laboratory Parameters (taken at 20 wells)
• NOx (NO2 + NO3 soluble)
• Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
• Total dissolved Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN-D)
• Total phosphorus (TP)
• Total dissolved phosphorus (TPD)
*Surface water samples will only be obtained if the surface water depth at the well location is greater
than 15cm (6 inches)
Soil Characterization: Soil characterizations will provide information necessary to fully understand
changes in hydrology and vegetation over time. An initial physical/hydrologic characterization of the soil
will be made at each well location during installation and at the center of each of the tree and shrub
vegetation monitoring plots along each transect (see below) using the methods outlined in Field
Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils. Each
soil characterization will be cross-referenced with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
soil survey data for that location.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
5
Quantitative Vegetative Monitoring: Sixty (60) 75-meter monitoring transects will be established to
monitor vegetation changes over time. Transects will be placed near well locations within homogeneous
vegetation communities (FLUCCS community). Each transect contains three (3) canopy\shrub vegetation
monitoring plots and six (6) groundcover vegetation monitoring plots. Plot-based methods will quantify
vegetation along each transect. See Exhibit 3 for a sample well location with vegetation transect layout.
After initial monitoring efforts are completed, some transects, particularly those associated with wells
outside natural vegetation areas, may be eliminated from future monitoring. Field ecologists will
establish each monitoring transect using a sub-meter, Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) and
tape measure. Each vegetation monitoring plot is a 10-meter square and the corners will be
permanently marked using PVC pipes. The GPS coordinates are recorded at the center of each plot.
Additionally, the center of each 1-meter groundcover quadrat is marked with PVC and GPS located along
the monitoring transect.
Quantitative vegetation monitoring parameters will consist of:
1. Density, dominance, area, and composition of canopy and sub-canopy species
2. Percent cover and composition of shrub species
3. Percent cover and composition of groundcover species.
The vegetation strata to be monitored are defined as follows:
• Canopy and sub-canopy trees will be defined as those woody plants with a diameter at breast
height (dbh) greater than 2.5 cm (dbh to be measured 130 cm above ground surface)
• The shrub layer will consist of shrub species and trees with a dbh less than 2.5cm
• Ground cover will consist of all plants not found in the other strata, primarily herbaceous
species.
Canopy, sub-canopy, shrub species, and groundcover will continue to be monitored annually during the
dry season. High water levels in portions of the PSSF and limited access would make monitoring of
vegetation (especially groundcover) difficult during the rainy season. For this reason, vegetation
monitoring will take place on an annual basis, in early spring.
Canopy, Sub-canopy, and Shrub Vegetation Monitoring Methodology
Quantification of canopy and sub-canopy species will occur at three (3) 10-meter square plots centered
on three randomly selected quadrat locations of the six (6) groundcover monitoring locations along each
transect. Once the sampling areas are established (currently underway with Pot 1 funding), subsequent
monitoring will occur at the same locations during each annual monitoring event. Each canopy, sub-
canopy, and shrub species will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible and percent coverage
will be determined. All trees located within each 10-meter plot with a dbh greater than 2.5 cm will be
identified with numbered tree tags to allow tracking of health and growth rates over time.
Measurements will include dbh, percent canopy cover, and general health. For trees with multiple
trunks, each trunk dbh will be measured separately and recorded to indicate the affiliation of the
multiple trunks with a single tree.
In evaluating health condition of each tagged tree, a Health Assessment Score (HAS) will be assigned.
The HAS scoring matrix breaks down as follows:
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
6
Once each tree is assigned a HAS, each plot will then be assigned an average HAS relative to the total
number of trees in that plot. A plot HAS closer to “0” generally indicates poorer health, while a HAS
closer to “2” generally indicates greater health.
Groundcover Vegetation Monitoring Methodology
Groundcover is quantified within 1-meter quadrats located at 15-meter intervals along each transect
(total of 6 quadrats). A 1-meter square quadrat frame centered on a fixed transect point provides the
areal basis for groundcover data collection. The composition and cover of vegetation, as defined above,
will be quantified using direct visual estimates. Vegetation not identified to species level will be
identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible.
All monitoring data will be entered into a Microsoft Excel database. The wetland indicator status as
defined in Chapter 62-340, Florida Administrative Code and the native/non-native status of each species
will also be recorded. A statistical analysis of the relative proportions of each vegetative cover class will
be conducted to develop trends on a semi-annual and annual basis. These statistical analyses of
quantitative vegetative cover class data will be coupled with water level data, to determine whether,
and if so to what degree, there is a causal link between water level changes and vegetative cover.
Qualitative monitoring will occur at each plot location. Notes on the type of community being sampled,
the general health of the vegetation, soil inundation, standing water levels, recruitment of new species,
and the presence or spread of nuisance/exotic species will be recorded on field data sheets.
Observations of wildlife, consisting of direct sightings, scat, tracks, or vocalizations, will also be noted.
The qualitative monitoring for each plot will be summarized in paragraph format.
On an annual basis, 180-degree panoramic photos will be taken at each plot location. Orientation of the
panoramas will be north, with the plot station marker in the center of the frame. Panoramas are meant
to assist in documentation of trends over time. Quarterly well data (water levels \ water quality) and
annual vegetation monitoring data will be compiled into an annual report at the end of each calendar
year. The annual report will contain data for each monitoring plot with GIS exhibits, spreadsheets, and
summary graphs sufficient enough to convey field data.
Supporting Information: The methodology/approach selected is based upon existing literature for
monitoring provided through the (1) South Florida Water Management District Water Use/Consumptive
Use Permits Wetlands/Surface Waters Monitoring Plan Guidelines, (2) The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’
National Wetland Plant List, and (3) the USDA’s Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. In
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
7
addition, the following studies were consulted to ensure the use of best available science in developing
the monitoring plan.
1. Effective Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico (2017). National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine 2017. https://doi.org/10.17226/23476.
2. Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Seventh Biennial Review – 2018. National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.17226/25198.
3. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
F.A.C 62-160.110. FS 2100. Surface Water Sampling and FS 2200 Groundwater Sampling;
https://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-assurance/content/dep-sops
4. Restoring the Rookery Bay Estuary (2014 - funded by National Estuarine Research Reserve
Systems (NERRS) Science Collaboration) https://rookerybay.org/learn/research/technical-
reports.html
5. Collier County Watershed Management Plan Final Report (2011-Atkins)
https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/home/showdocument?id=41091
Collier County and its team of consultants working on the CCCWIP will continue to review available peer
reviewed data to improve the project design, activities and inform adaptive management.
Risks and Uncertainties: The monitoring program for the CCCWIP has few risks and uncertainties,
however, the following will be addressed to ensure that the metrics are met.
• Grant fund availability in future years
• Access to monitoring sites and inadvertent harm to the environment
The strategy to mitigate this risk is locating the monitoring sites near access roads and foot
trails. This involved coordinating the location of the monitoring wells with the Florida Division of
Forestry, private property owners and the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.
These entities will also be notified when sampling events will be taking place.
• Vandalism or theft
The strategy to mitigate this risk is to clearly identify the monitoring equipment as governmental
property by labeling the monitoring well piping and data loggers
The condition of the monitoring wells will be inspected and maintained on a quarterly basis at each
download event.
Leveraged Funds: Collier County plans to utilize all of the RESTORE Direct Component Funds (Pot 1) and
the County’s allocation of Spill Impact Fund (Pot 3) on the CCCWIP. In addition, Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council Funds (Pot 2) will be sought to leverage local funds to complete phases of the
CCCWIP. In 2018, Collier County received a Direct Component award of $1,532,077.76 to begin the
preliminary design of the multi-phased project, establish channels of communication with permitting
agencies, model the area of impact, develop the monitoring plan, install monitoring wells and begin
collecting baseline data. Pre-construction monitoring will continue through 2019 with Pot 1 funds. Pot 3
funding will be used to continue baseline data collection in 2020, spot monitoring and maintenance as
needed in 2021 and for post construction monitoring anticipated to start in 2022.
Metrics: Metric PRM006 – Monitoring – number of sites monitored. Monitoring is identified as a
project milestone in the Council approved State Expenditure Plan. Additional information about the
methodology for the monitoring is included in the Observational Data Plan (ODP).
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
8
Environmental Compliance: See attached checklist. A State Forest Use Permit, 03082019-A, has been
granted to cover the installation of the wells and the baseline monitoring. It is expected that the
another permit will be needed for post-construction monitoring conducted under this application and
the process for this permit will satisfy all required environmental compliance requirements.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
CCCWIPCollier County, Florida AS SHOWN02/08/19 N/A
MONITORINGWELL LOCATIONS
SHEET NO. DATE PROJECT NO. SCALE
E A R T H T E C H E N V I R O N M E N TA L , L L C
E A R T H T E C H E N V I R O N M E N TA L , L L C1 0 6 0 0 J O L E A A V E
1 0 6 0 0 J O L E A A V EB O N I T A S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5
B O N I T A S P R I N G S , F L O R I D A 3 4 1 3 5P H O N E ( 2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 - 0 0 3 0
P H O N E ( 2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 - 0 0 3 0
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s ss
s
s
s
ss
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s s
s
s
s
s
s
s
6
7
3
5
9
4
8
1 2
50
46
19
48
47
39
5742
44
60
51
43
49
56
25
53
11
1817
13
59
14
58
23
29
45
54
28
22
52
1210
34 2015
32
27
41
33
24
30 55
31
3837
21
35
16
26
36
40
±
0 4,000 8,0002,000
Feet
Project Area
Extent of Core Flow-way
Trails (Provided by PSSF)
Monitoring Well Locations (60)
s Wells with Water Quality Sampling (20)
s Wells without Water Quality Sampling (40)
EXHIBIT 1
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC. • 10600 JOLEA AVENUE, BONITA SPRING, FLORIDA 34135 • PH: 239.304.0030 • FAX: 239.324.0054 • www.eteflorida.com
Project: ________________________________ Well #: _________________________________
Date Installed: ___________________________ Hobo Logger S/N: ________________________
Installed by: _____________________________ Hobo Water Level S/N:____________________
Well #: _________________________________ Logging Interval:_________________________
Well Installation Form
BOTTOM OF WELL
NATURAL GROUND (NG)
TOP OF PIPE
TO NG:
LENGTH OF
CABLE:
NG TO BOTTOM
OF TRANSDUCER:
SHOULD BE 1 FOOT
TOP OF PIPE TO
BOTTOM OF WELL: GRAVEL GRAVEL CAP
TOP OF PIPE
TOP OF CAP TO
GROUND:
TOP OF CAP TO
BOTTOM OF
TRANSDUCER:
TOP OF CAP TO
BOTTOM OF
WELL:
TOP OF WELL TO
BOTTOM OF
TRANSDUCER:
Reference Point
Notes:
EXHIBIT 2 16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
CCCWIP EXAMPLE WELL & TRANSECTWELL POINT # 5COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
C2018-052PROJECT
DRAWN BY
SHEET
DATE
KM
FEB 2019CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION # 4815
TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC.10199 SOUTHSIDE BOULEVARDSUITE 310JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
s
")
")
")T5-P3
T5-P2
T5-P1T-5621
411
621
625
624
624
621
624
624
740
0 250125
ONE INCH = 250 FEETIMAGE SOURCE: FDOT
5 OF 60
")Monitoring Plots
Monitoring Transects
FLUCCS
411/Pine Flatwoods
621/Cypress
624/Cypress - Pine - Cabbage Palm
625/Wet Pinelands Hydric Pine
740/Disturbed Land
G:\ETEnv Documents\PROJECTS\COLLIER\Collier County Watershed Improvement Plan RFP\GIS\WellSiteMaps_2-8-19.mxd
EXHIBIT 3 16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
Budget Narrative
1.0 SUMMARY AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding in the amount of $725,760 is requested. Budget amount is based on Opinion of
Proposed Cost provided by the engineering firm conducting the preliminary design and installing
the monitoring wells.
Funding will be used to conduct baseline and post‐construction monitoring data
Co‐funding has been used from the RESTORE Direct Component to develop the monitoring plan,
identify sites for monitoring and install monitoring equipment.
NOTE ‐ In describing the budget and providing cost details, it may be helpful to breakdown the budget into
functional areas, tasks or time periods. Under this approach, detailed information for each item of cost must still
be provided and associated with the applicable Budget Object Class (see Sections 3 and 4 below).
TOTAL PROJECT OR PROGRAM FUNDS REQUESTED $725,760
Total Pre‐Award Funds Requested $0
Total Direct Costs Requested $725,760
Total Allowable Indirect Costs Requested $0
Total Program Income Anticipated $0
2.0 PRE‐AWARD COSTS (applicable to grant applications only)
No pre‐award costs are being requested.
TOTAL PRE‐AWARD FUNDS REQUESTED $0
3.0 Budget Object Classes Applicable to All Projects and Programs – DIRECT COSTS
3.1 PERSONNEL
No personnel costs are being requested.
3.2 FRINGE BENEFITS
No fringe benefits are being requested.
3.3 TRAVEL
No Travel is being requested.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
3.5 EQUIPMENT
No Equipment is being requested.
3.6 SUPPLIES
No Supplies are being requested
3.7 OTHER DIRECT COSTS
No other direct costs are being requested
3.8 SUBRECIPIENTS
Collier County is the subrecipient to the Gulf Consortium. No additional subrecipients are identified.
3.9 CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS
1. Name of Contractor—To be identified
2. Method of Selection—Competitively bid per Collier County Procurement Policies
3. Period of Performance—TBD
4. Scope of Work—Collecting samples at monitoring sites, data collection and analysis.
5. Method of Accountability—Quarterly reports
6. Itemized Budget and Justification—
NOTE on Consulting Fees—For each consultant, provide the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily
fee (8‐hour day), and estimated time on the project. List and provide details for all expenses anticipated to be paid
from the award to the individual consultants in addition to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodging, etc.).
Organization Description Amount
Pre‐Award
Costs?
TBD Contract for monitoring and data collection $725,760 ☐
☐
☐
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL: $725,760
TOTAL OF DIRECT COSTS $725,760
4.0 Budget Object Classes Applicable to All Projects and Programs – INDIRECT
COSTS
No Indirect Costs are being applied for by the County
TOTAL CALCULATED INDIRECT/OVERHEAD COSTS: $0
5.0 PROGRAM INCOME
There is no program income anticipated with this project.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
TOTAL PROGRAM INCOME ANTICIPATED $0
6.0 CASH DRAWDOWN PROJECTIONS
The County will be reimbursed to pay for the contractual costs of the project.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
Milestone
Milestone Milestone Type Description Start
Date
Expected
Date
Milestone
Plan Amount
($)
Deliverable (Y/N)
Monitoring Scientific
Monitoring and
Metrics
The Consultant
(TBD) will
conduct
monitoring
activities
consistent with
the
Observational
Data Plan and
the Data
Management
Plan (see ODP
and DMP
documents
attached to this
application).
2020 2024 $725,760 Yes
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
Metrics
Activity‐Outcome Information
Template Restore, Improve, and Protect Water Resources
Activity‐Outcome PRM006‐Monitoring ‐ # sites being monitored
Edit Activity‐Outcome
Sites Monitored – Baseline 60 number of sites monitored at start of project (i.e., baseline)
Sites Monitored ‐ Current 0 number of sites monitored (i.e., accomplishments)
Sites Monitored ‐ Project
Completion 60 number of sites monitored by end of project (i.e., target)
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
1
Observational Data Plan (ODP)
Project Information
Project name:
Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan
Agency:
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Project phase (planning/implementation):
Monitoring
Project phase(s) to which this ODP pertains:
Monitoring – Pre and Post-Implementation
Project ODP point(s) of contact:
Gary McAlpin, (239) 252-5342, Gary.McAlpin@colliercountyfl.gov
Expected observational data collection start and end dates:
Pre-implementation monitoring for baseline data began in 2019 and will continue into
2020. Post construction monitoring is anticipated to start in 2022 for 3 years post
construction (exact dates TBD based on completion of construction and will be included
in an updated version of this plan with the first annual report). During years of
construction (anticipated to be year 2021) spot monitoring, equipment removal and
reinstallation in the event of a natural hazard and well/transect maintenance will occur.
Estimated end date is 12/31/2024.
Short description of the project location:
Approximately 10,000 acres of eastern Collier County, a county located on the
southwestern side of Florida on the Gulf of Mexico. The project area is located in HUC
03090204 and the actual acreage is subject to change based on further design and
permitting.
Short description of the overall project construction features:
The Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan (CCCWIP) is a series
of linked surface water management projects on approximately 10,000 acres of eastern
Collier County, Florida with the objectives of restoring the hydrology and ecology of both
Naples Bay and Rookery Bay, as well as the hydrologic restoration of the western, Belle
Meade area, of the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF). The goal of the CCCWIP is to
divert water from entering Naples Bay, which is impacted by a freshwater surplus during
wet season, by creating a flow-way from the Golden Gate Canal (GGC) structure
through the PSSF to Rookery Bay, which has a freshwater deficit.
Identification of Metrics, Associated Measures, and Success Criteria for Each
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
2
Metrics to be reported to RAAMS:
1. Monitoring – Number of Sites Monitored (PRM006)
Success criteria for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of monitoring sites):
60 sites monitored
Measure I: Hydrologic Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring wells within and outside the area of potential project
influence.
Success criteria:
a. Quarterly monitoring events completed
Measure II: Water Quality Monitoring
Assess project related changes in total nitrogen and total phosphorus at 20 of the
groundwater monitoring wells.
Success criteria:
Quarterly monitoring events and lab analysis of water quality completed
Identification and Discussion of the Reference Sites/Conditions
Reference conditions for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of monitoring sites):
Measure I. Hydrologic Monitoring
The entire project area will not be directly impacted by the restoration project,
therefore areas outside of the project impact area will be used as reference condition
for habitat composition (see attached map).
Measure II. Water Quality Monitoring
The entire project area will not be directly impacted by the restoration project,
therefore areas outside of the project impact area will be used as reference condition
for habitat composition (see attached map).
Baseline Condition Sampling/Data Mining Plans
Baseline plan for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of monitoring sites):
Baseline condition sampling/data mining will be determined during the implementation
of the monitoring program.
Potential Corrective Actions
Corrective actions for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of sites monitored):
Measure I. Hydrologic Monitoring
N/A sites must be monitored
Measure II. Water Quality Monitoring
N/A sites must be monitored
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
3
Observational Data Collection
Plan for Metric 1 (Monitoring – number of sites monitored):
Measure I. Hydrologic Monitoring
Purpose:
Document hydrology, hydrologic conditions post construction.
Methods:
Each monitoring well will be equipped with a HOBO MX2001-04 water level data
logger that will record water levels and barometric pressure at least twice daily.
On a quarterly basis, water level data will be downloaded, saved in raw data and
spreadsheet formats, and summarized in graphs. Rainfall data will be obtained
from the same stations used in the surface water – ground water modeling effort
or obtained from appropriate stations reported in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online (CDO) for correlations
to surface water and ground water elevations.
Schedule/Timing and Frequency:
Pre-implementation monitoring is currently in process and will continue into 2020.
During construction spot monitoring, equipment removal and reinstallation in the
event of a natural hazard and well/transect maintenance will occur. Data
collection will continue post construction for up to 3 years.
Sample Size:
TBD
Site Locations:
See attached map.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control:
Sampling will be conducted in accordance with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
F.A.C 62-160.110, FS 2100 for surface water sampling and FS 2200 for
groundwater sampling.
Measure II. Water Quality Monitoring
Purpose:
Document baseline water quality before construction and post construction to
determine project-related changes in total nitrogen and total phosphorus.
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
4
Methods:
Samples for lab analysis of water quality will be collected on a quarterly basis
from twenty (20) of the monitoring wells. If the surface water depth is greater than
15 cm (6 inches) at any of the well locations, a surface water sample will also be
collected for lab analysis.
Schedule/Timing and Frequency:
Pre-implementation monitoring is currently in process and will continue into 2020.
During construction spot monitoring, equipment removal and reinstallation in the
event of a natural hazard and well/transect maintenance will occur. Data
collection will continue post construction for up to 3 years.
Sample Size:
TBD
Site Locations:
See attached map
Quality Assurance and Quality Control:
Sampling will be conducted in accordance with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
F.A.C 62-160.110 FS2100 Surface Water Sampling and FS 2200 Groundwater
Sampling.
Anticipated Statistical Analysis
Analysis for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of sites monitored):
Measure I. Hydrologic Monitoring
Detect changes in hydrology over time.
Measure II. Water Quality Monitoring
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), descriptive and summary of changes in water
quality.
Unforeseen Event Contingency
Contingency plans for Metric 1 (Monitoring – Number of Sites Monitored):
N/A
Consistency with Local or Regional Planning/Monitoring Efforts
The ecological impacts associated with alterations in the amount, quantity and timing of
freshwater inflows into Collier County’s estuaries have been noted for at least 30 years
The Collier County Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP – Adkins: 2011)
established the groundwork for which the CCCWIP was developed. The Surface Water
Improvement Management (SWIM) Plan (South Florida Water Management District
2007) for Naples Bay calls for the diversion of stormwater from the Golden Gate Canal
from entering Naples Bay. Restoring the Rookery Bay Estuary (2014 - funded by
National Estuarine Research Reserve Systems (NERRS) Science Collaboration) and
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
5
the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study A Comprehensive Watershed Plan - Functional
Group Belle Meade Flow-Way Restoration FG-15 (USACE) all identify the need to
reduce pulse flows to the coast, divert water from the Golden Gate Canal and restore
the natural estuarine salinity regimes of Naples and Rookery Bays.
Observational Data Collection and Reporting Budget
Estimated total budget for observational data collection:
$108,864 on an annual basis or $544,320
Metric 1: Monitoring
Estimated total budget for observational data reporting:
$36,288 on an annual basis or $181,440
Estimated budget for contingency monitoring:
N/A
Location of observational data costs in Overall Project Budget, Budget Narrative or
Milestones:
Observational data collection costs:
$544,320 is located in the budget narrative
Observational data reporting costs:
$181,440 is located in the budget narrative
Data Review and Reporting
Annual reports will be developed for submission through RAAMS, and will measure
progress towards project goals and objectives.
Literature Cited
Collier County Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP – Adkins: 2011)
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) F.A.C 62-160.110. FS 2100. Surface Water Sampling and
FS 2200 Groundwater Sampling; https://floridadep.gov/dear/quality-
assurance/content/dep-sops
Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan – Monitoring Plan,
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC (2019)
The Surface Water Improvement Management (SWIM) Plan (South Florida
Water Management District 2007)
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/naples%20bay%20swim%2
0plan%20final%
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
6
Restoring the Rookery Bay Estuary (2014 - funded by National Estuarine
Research Reserve Systems (NERRS) Science Collaboration)
https://rookerybay.org/learn/research/technical-reports.html
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
1
Data Management Plan
Project Information
Project name:
Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan (CCCWIP) Monitoring Program
Agency:
Collier County Board of County Commissioners – Coastal Zone Management
Project phase(s) to which this DMP pertains:
Pre and Post‐Implementation monitoring
Data Steward(s):
Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Manager, (239) 252‐5342, Gary.McAlpin@colliercountyfl.gov
Expected data collection start date:
Targeted FY20
Expected data collection end date:
12/31/2024.
Brief project description:
The Collier County Comprehensive Watershed Improvement Plan (CCCWIP) is a series of linked surface
water management projects on approximately 10,000 acres of eastern Collier County, Florida with the
objectives of restoring the hydrology and ecology of both Naples Bay and Rookery Bay, as well as the
hydrologic restoration of the western, Belle Meade area, of the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF). The
goal of the CCCWIP is to divert water from entering Naples Bay, which is impacted by a freshwater
surplus during wet season, by creating a flow‐way from the Golden Gate Canal (GGC) structure through
the PSSF to Rookery Bay, which has a freshwater deficit.
Project location:
Approximately 10,000 acres of eastern Collier County, a county located on the southwestern side of
Florida on the Gulf of Mexico. (Figure 1). The project area is located in HUC 03090204.
Approximate center of site: 26.113655 N 81.630367
General description of data collection activities (methods, sampling frequency, etc.):
The monitoring program implements a before‐after‐control‐impact (BACI) design that will quantify
baseline (pre‐construction) and will be compared to with‐project (after construction) vegetation and
surface water conditions. (National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine 2017 – Effective
Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico). The metric to be used to measure
outcome will be PRM006, “Monitoring ‐ # sties being monitored.”
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
2
Sixty (60) shallow groundwater monitoring wells will be installed within and outside the area of
potential project influence (see Exhibit 1 for well locations). Monitoring wells will be placed in as diverse
a selection of existing vegetation communities as possible. Each monitoring well will be equipped with a
HOBO MX2001‐04 water level data logger that will record water levels and barometric pressure at least
twice daily. On a quarterly basis, water level data will be downloaded, saved in raw data and
spreadsheet formats, and summarized in graphs. Rainfall data will be obtained from the same stations
used in the surface water – ground water modeling effort or obtained from appropriate stations
reported in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online (CDO) for
correlations to surface water and ground water elevations. Alternatively, if a site can be identified within
the Picayune Strand State Forest, a stand‐alone rain gauge will be installed to directly collect rainfall
data for the project area. At each quarterly download event, the wells will be inspected and
appropriately maintained.
Samples for lab analysis of water quality will be collected on a quarterly basis from twenty (20) of the
monitoring wells (See Exhibit 2 ‐ monitoring wells where lab analyzed water sampling will take place are
showing in blue). If the surface water depth is greater than 15 cm (6 inches) at any of the well locations,
a surface water sample will also be collected for lab analysis. Sampling will be conducted in accordance
with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) F.A.C 62‐160.110, FS 2100 for surface water sampling and FS 2200 for groundwater sampling. All
water samples will be properly labeled in laboratory provided sample bottles, stored on ice in a cooler,
and sent to a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) certified laboratory.
Estimated budget for data management:
$181,440. This budget is incorporated into the overall Monitoring budget for the CCCWIP.
Location of costs in the Overall Project Budget, Budget Narrative, and/or Milestones:
Data Compilation, Exhibits, Tables & Reporting
Annual Report
Data Management Capabilities
Do you have in‐house data management and metadata capacity? (Yes/No):
Yes
If yes, describe how this project’s data and metadata will be:
1) Stored
The project data along with corresponding ISO compliant metadata will be stored on a server
and backed up regularly to an offsite location.
2) Archived
At the completion of the project, final project data and metadata will be submitted to the
National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) for archiving.
3) Made available to others (including delivery to the Council)
The applicable GIS data layers will be service enabled and made available for consumption
through the Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department. The tabular data will also be
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
3
available for download through a password‐protected web interface. In addition, all electronic
data and metadata will be delivered to the RESTORE Council on a yearly basis for review and
approval.
If no, describe how you will ensure items 1‐3 above are accomplished:
N/A
Will project data/metadata use digital object identifiers (DOIs)?:
DOIs will not be used
Observational Data Types
Fill out the following fields of information for each type of data being collected. For information that is
not known at this time, please indicate that it is TBD and include a timeframe and plan for providing
updated information. Recipients must deliver updated DMPs to the Council at least annually until all
“N/A” or “TBD” values are provided.
Data type 1:
Aerial imagery
GIS representation:
TBD
Frequency of collection:
TBD
Duration of collection:
Spanning 5 years
Data storage format:
TBD
Units:
TBD
Data type 2:
Vegetation composition maps
GIS representation:
TBD
Frequency of collection:
TBD
Duration of collection:
Spanning 5 years
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
4
Data storage format:
TBD
Units:
TBD
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
SF‐424A / SF‐424CTOTAL12345(6)a Personnel ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ b Fringe Benefits ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ c Travel ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ d Equipment ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ e Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ f(1) Contractual 725,760 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 725,760 f(2) Subrecipient(s)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Construction or Land Acquisition g1 ‐ Construction Management / Legal Expenses‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g2 ‐ Land, Structures, etc.‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g3 ‐ Relocation‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g4 ‐ Architectural and Engineering fees, etc.‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g5 ‐ Project Inspection Fees‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g6 ‐ Site Work‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g7 ‐ Demolition and Removal‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g8 ‐ Construction‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g9 ‐ Equipment‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g10 ‐ Miscellaneous‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Construction SUBTOTAL (lines g1‐g10)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g11 ‐ Contingencies (applicable to construction only)‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g Total Construction/Land Acquisition Charges ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ h Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ iTOTAL Direct Charges (sum of 6a ‐ 6h)725,760 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 725,760 Enter the federally approved indirect rate (%)0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%jAllowable Indirect Charges *‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ kTOTALS (sum of 6i and 6j) 725,760 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 725,760 * Note: Where Allowable Indirect Charges are included, a copy of the subrecipient's current Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement must be submitted. * Using De Minimis indirect rate, indirect costs are simple 10% of Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC)* MTDC includes all salarie, fringe, materials and supplies, contractual costs, travel, and the first $25k of subawardsSupplemental Budget Template ‐ Subrecipients6 Object Class categoriesSubrecipient Name (if known; if not known briefly describe anticipated role)Draft 5‐1‐2015Internal Work Product of the RESTORE Council Not for Distribution 16.A.2.bPacket Pg. 557Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
Council Environmental Compliance Checklist
Environmental
Requirement
Has the requirement
been addressed?
Compliance Notes (e.g.,
status of application,
permit number, etc.)
National Environmental Policy Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Endangered Species Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
National Historic Preservation Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Magnuson‐Stevens Act (Essential
Fish Habitat)
___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Coastal Barrier Resources Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Clean Water Act Section 404 ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Clean Water Act Section 401 ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
River and Harbors Act Section 10 ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act
___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Marine Mammal Protection Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
National Marine Sanctuaries Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act
___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
Clean Air Act ___ Yes ___ No _X__ N/A
16.A.2.b
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)
16.A.2.bPacket Pg. 559Attachment: Application SEP RESTORE (8527 : RESTORE State Expenditure Plan Grant Application)