Agenda 04/14/2009 Item #16E 3
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
Page 1 of 60
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the Milano Preserve Final Management Plan under
the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval from the Board of County Commissioners (Board) for the
Milano Preserve Final Management Plan (FMP) and for the Board to give direction to the
County Manager, or his designee, for its implementation.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Conservation Collier Ordinance, No. 2002-63. as amended, Section
14(2), requires that a Final Management Plan be prepared for each property, with review and
input by the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. This plan shall identify management
activities necessary to preserve, enhance, restore, maintain and monitor the property, and
estimate the costs of the project. Additionally, the Plan shall identify how public use compatible
to the parcel shall be accomplished.
The Milano Property is comprised of 18.46 acres and is located approximately 2.10 miles east
of Interstate 75 between Preserve Lane and Preserve Circle on the north side of Immokalee
Road. The property was purchased by Collier County in 2006. The Interim Management Plan
was approved by the Board in 2006. The Lands Evaluation and Management Subcommittee of
the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLAAC) has reviewed the
draft Final Management Plan and on January 13, 2009. a public meeting was held, inviting all
neighbors of the Preserve to attend and provide comments. The final draft was presented to the
CCLAAC on March 9, 2009. The CCLAAC unanimously recommended approval with two
suggested changes. These changes were made with the addition of Action Item 3.2 under Goal
3 (Page 41 of the Plan) and with a change to Action Item 2.1 under Goal 2 on page 39 to
specify wildlife and plant sampling of only non-listed species.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of land management activities for the first year of implementation
have been estimated to range between $3.850 and $203,850 depending on whether staff will
start to plan and permit a raised boardwalk. Staff will first seek grant funding to assist in
reducing these costs. The annual costs will lessen fOllowing initial site development to between
$2.670 and $5,520 per year. Funds are budgeted within the Conservation Collier Land
Management Fund to accomplish these activities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Management of Conservation Collier lands to support
appropriate public access is consistent with and supports Policy 1.1.6 and Objective 1.3 in the
Recreation and Open Space Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Conservation Collier Ordinance (No. 2002-63, as
amended), in Section 14, provides a legal framework for development of management plans
and for use of environmentally sensitive lands. The Office of the County Attorney has reviewed
and approved the Final Management Plan for form and legal sufficiency. This item is not quasi-
judicial and as such. ex parte disclosures are not required. A majority vote of the Board is
necessary for Board action. -HFAC
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the attached Final
Management Plan and directs the County Manager. or his designee, to implement it for the
Milano Preserve.
PREPARED BY: Christal Segura, Environmental Specialist, Conservation COllier Program,
Department of Facilities Management
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16E3
Page I of I
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
Page 2 of 60
Recommendation to approve the Milano Preserve Final Management Plan under the
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program
4/14/200990000 AM
Prepared By
Christal Segura
Administrative Services
Environmental Specialist
Facilities Management
Date
3/27/20099:29:55 AM
Approved By
Melissa Hennig
Administrative Services
Environmental Specialist
Facilities Management
Date
3/27/200910:18 AM
Approved By
Heidi F. Ashton
County Attorney
Assistant County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Date
3/30/200911:41 AM
Approved By
Skip Camp, C.F.M.
Administrative Services
Facilities Management Director
Facilities Management
Date
3/30/2009 11 :46 AM
Approved By
Len Golden Price
Administrative Services
Administrative Services Administrator
Administrative Services Admin.
Date
3/31/200910:34 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
County Attorney
County Attorney Office
Oate
3/31/2009 1 :28 PM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
OMS Coordinator
Office of Management & Budget
Date
3/31/20094:07 PM
Approved By
Laura Davisson
County Manager's Office
Management & Budget Analyst
Office of Management & Budget
Date
4/2/20094:18 PM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
Board of County
Commissioners
Deputy County Manager
County Manager's Office
Date
4/2/2009 6:06 PM
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manal!emifflrftiiirPf 60
Milano Preserve
Land Management Plan
Managed by: Conservation Collier Program
Collier County, Florida
April 2009 - April 2019 (IO-yr plan)
Prepared by:
Conservation Collier Staff;
Collier County Facilities Management Department
~
(. (, ,'c-II..",' "1.1\';]"",'_1"'; "';10(\ '"-,,,Cl1_'I'II';,,"i.:',,,,\IHiJ:L01,.,ot,.:t':'ho'A',,,,,,,_",""1..,',bn"gc",""t,I'I:,,,;jo,-
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazemflarRidnof 60
Milano Preserve
Land Management Plan Executive Summary
Lead Agency: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Conservation Collier
Program
Property included in this Plan: "Milano Preserve" l8.46-acres. Preserve consists of
two adjoining parcels of 9.23-acres each in Section 21, Township 48, and Range 26 of
Collier County, Florida.
Folio Number Legal Description
00186320002 214826 W Y:, OF W '12 OF SE V. OF SE V., LESS R1W 9.23 AC
00186280003 21 4826 E y, OF W Y:, OF SE V. OF SE V., LESS R1W 9.23 AC OR
5l9PG467
Management Responsibilities:
Agency: Collier County - Conservation Collier Program
Designated Land Use: Conservation and natural resource based recreation
Unique Features: cypress-pine-cabbage palm, cypress and pine flatwoods communities;
four listed plant species recorded to date; preserve is within the Corkscrew Swamp
Sanctuary Wood Stork Core Foraging Area
Management Goals:
Goall: Eliminate or significantly reduce human irnpacts to indigenous flora and
fauna
Goal2: Develop a baseline monitoring report
Goal 3: Remove or control populations of invasive, exotic or problematic flora and
fauna
Goal 4: Determine if prescribed fire and/or mechanical treatments are feasible to
decrease woody invasion resulting from past fire exclusion; if so proceed
Goal 5: Restore and maintain native habitats
Goal 6: Develop a plan for public use
Goal 7: Facilitate uses of the site for educational purposes
Goal 8: Provide a plan for security and disaster preparedness
Public Involvement: Public meeting held in January 2009 with residents and businesses
from surrounding lands including staff from the Laurel Oak Elementary and Gulf Coast
High Schools.
Conservation Collier Program
2
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manai!emlils'fli5nof 60
Table of Contents
Land Management Plan Executive Summary................................................................ 2
List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 4
List of Figures .................................................................................................................... 5
List of Appendices ............................................................................................................. 5
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6
1.1 Conservation Collier: Land Acquisition Program and Management Authority.............. 6
1.2 Purpose and Scope of Plan ..................................................................................................... 7
1.3 Location of the Milano Preserve............................................................................................ 7
1.4 Regional Significance of the Milano Preserve ...................................................................... 8
1.5 Nearhy Public Lands and Designated Water Resources..................................................... 9
1.6 Public Involvement ...............................................................................................................10
2.0 Natural Resources......................................................................................................10
2.1 Physiography ......................................................................................................................... 10
2.1.1 Topography and Geomorphology ..................................................................................... 10
2.1.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................ 10
2.1.3 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 11
2.1.4 Hydrology/Water Management ........................................................................................ 13
2.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................... 13
2.3 Natural Plant Communities ................................................................................................. 13
2.3, I Wetlands: Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm ........................................................................... 17
2.3.2 Wetlands: Cypress ..........................................,................................................................. 18
2.3.3 Uplands: Pine Flatwoods .................................................................................................. 19
2.3.4 Uplands: Australian Pine ..................................................................................................20
2.4 Native Plant and Animal Species......................................................................................... 20
2.4.1 Plant Species..................................................................................................................... 21
2.4.2 Animal Species .................................................................................................................21
2.5 Listed Species ........................................................................................................................23
2.5.1 Listed Plant Species.......................................................................................................... 23
2.5.2 Listed Animal Species ......................................................................................................25
2.6 Invasive, Non-native and Problem Species......................................................................... 26
2.6.1 Invasive and Problem Plant Species................................................................................. 27
2.6.2 Invasive and Problem Animal Species ............................................................................. 28
3.0 Previous and Current Use of the Preserve; Adjacent Land Uses ......................... 32
3.1 Previous Use of the Preserve and Adjoining Lands........................................................... 32
3.2 Current Land Uses................................................................................................................33
3.3 Cultural, Historical and Archeological Resource Protection ...........................................34
Conservation Collier ProJ::rram
o
J
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!emFlsrPilinof 60
3.4 Major Accomplishments during Previous Years ...............................................................35
4.0 Future Use of the Milano Preserve including Management Issues, Goals and
Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 35
4.1 Management Plan Framework ............................................................................................ 35
4.1.1 Preserve Manager: Contact Information ........................................................................36
4.2 Planned Uses and Assessment of their Impacts .................................................................36
4.2.1 Identification of Public Uses Consistent with Preservation, Enhancement, Restoration,
Conservation and Maintenance of the Resources ............................................................. 36
4.3 Desired Future Conditions ................................................................................................... 36
4.4 Goals for the 10 year period 2008.2018 .............................................................................. 37
4.5 Establish an Operational Plan for the Milano Preserve.................................................... 46
4.5.1 Maintenance......... ....... ......... ........... .......... ..... ....... ........ ......... ................. ...... .............. ...... 46
4.5.2 Estimated Annual Costs and Funding Sources................................................................. 46
4.5.3 Potential for Contracting Restoration and Management Activities by Private Vendors.. 49
5.0 Literature Cited ......................................................................................................... 50
List of Tables
Table I: Acquisition History and Status of Milano Preserve ......................................................... 6
Table 2: Public Lands Located near the Milano Preserve .............................................................. 9
Table 3: Extent of Florida Land Use, Land Cover Classification System Designations from 1995
and 2001 on the Milano Preserve........................................................................................... 14
Table 4: Summary of Natural Communities on the Milano Preserve........................................... 15
Table 5: Faunal Species Recorded on the Milano Preserve...........Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table 6: Breeding Bird Species Recorded in the Corkscrew SW Quadrangle ............................. 22
Encompassing the Milano Preserve .............................................................................................. 22
Table 7: Listed Plant Species Detected at the Milano Preserve.................................................... 23
Table 8: Invasive Plant Species at Milano Preserve ..................................................................... 27
Table 9: Major Accomplishments since the Acquisition of the Milano Preserve ....................... 35
Table 10: Invasive, Exotic Plant Species Control Plan for the Milano Preserve FLEPPC
Category I species a ................................................................................................................ 40
Table I]: Estimated Annual Land Management Budget ..............................................................47
Table 12: Potential Contracting for Restoration and Management Activities .............................. 49
Conservation Collier Program
4
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazemffflrPlill'f)f 60
List of Figures
Figure I: General Location of Milano Preserve. ............................................................................ 7
Figure 2: Conserved Lands in Collier County, Florida Including Lands Owned by Conservation
Coil ier... .............. ............. ................................................... ...................... ..... ............... ............ 8
Figure 3: Preserves and Protected Lands in the Vicinity of Milano Preserve ................................ 9
Figure 4: Aerial View of the Milano Preserve Showing Delineation of Parcels.......................... II
Figure 5: Soil Units on the Milano Preserve................................................................................. 12
Figure 6: Distribution of Natural Communities on the Milano Preserve A) 1995 FLUCCS Layer,
B) 2001 FLUCCS Layer ........................................................................................................ 16
Figure 7: Extent of Plant Communities Currently Found on the Milano Preserve....................... 17
Figure 8: Initial Exotic Vegetation Treatment Map for the Milano Preserve............................... 28
Figure 9: Historical Aerial Photograph from 1973 of the Milano Preserve and Adjoining Lands
................................................................................................................................................32
Figure 10: Historical Aerial Photograph from 1996 of the Milano Preserve and Adjoining Lands
................................................................................................................................................33
Figure II: Photo Point Locations within the Milano Preserve .................................................... 39
Figure 12: Milano Preserve Conceptual Master Plan .................................................................. 44
List of Appendices
Appendix 1: South Florida Vegetation Classification Scheme Crosswalks for Plant Communities
Observed on the Milano Preserve
Appendix 2: Preliminary Floristic Inventory of the Milano Preserve
Appendix 3: Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAl) Managed Area Tracking Record and
Element Occurrence Summary; FNAl ranking system explanation
Appendix 4: Existing and Proposed Preserves on the Terafina, Parklands and Mirasol Planned
Unit Developments.
Conservation Collier Program
5
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manai!emBsiflitfinof 60
1.0 Introduction
The Milano Preserve is an l8.46-acre natural area within the boundary of Collier County,
Florida. Native plant communities within the preserve include cypress-pine-cabbage palm,
cypress and pine flatwoods.
A site assessment to determine compliance with Conservation Collier's initial screening criteria
was conducted in February 2005 and the Conservation Collier Program purchased the property
on July 28, 2006. The County holds a fee simple title to the Milano Preserve. The Conservation
Collier program manages these lands under authority granted by Conservation Collier Ordinance
2002-63 as amended (2007-65; available from www.municode.com).lnitial acquisition
activities are summarized in table I.
Table 1: Acquisition History and Status of Milano Preserve
Year Benchmark
2005 Propertv nominated to the Conservation Collier Prm..>Tam
2005 Initial Criteria Screening Report accented bv the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisorv Committee
2006 Purchase aoofoved bv the Board of County Commissioners (Bee) and lands Durchased
2006 Interim Management Plan comnleted and annroved bv Bee
2009 Final Management Plan comoleted
Conservation, restoration and natural resource-based recreation are the designated uses of this
preserve. Management activities allowed include those necessary to preserve, restore, secure and
maintain this environmentally sensitive land for the benefit of present and future generations.
Public use of the site must be consistent with these management goals.
This is the Final Management Plan for the Milano Preserve. This 10-year management plan will
be submitted to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCe) for its approval.
When approved, this plan will replace the Interim Management Plan.
1.1 Conservation Collier: Land Acquisition Program and Management Authority
The Conservation Collier program was originally approved by voters in November 2002 and
subsequently confirmed in the November 2006 ballot referendum. Both voter-approved
referendums enable the program to acquire, preserve, restore, and maintain vital and significant
threatened natural lands, forest, upland and wetland communities located in Collier County,
Florida (Ordinance 2002-63, as amended). Properties must support at least two of the following
qualities to qualify for consideration: rare habitat, aquifer recharge, flood control, water quality
protection, and listed species habitat. The BCC appointed a Land Acquisition Advisory
Committee to consider any selected or nominated properties that an owner has indicated a
willingness to sell. The committee recommends property purchases for final approval by the
BCe.
Lands acquired with Conservation Collier funds are titled to "COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Conservation Collier program." The BCC
established the Conservation Collier program to implement the program and to manage acquired
lands. As such, Conservation Collier holds management authority for the Milano Preserve.
Conservation Collier Program
6
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!emiTsrfti!il1of 60
1.2 Purpose and Scope of Plan
The purpose of the plan is to provide management direction for Milano Preserve by identifying
the goals and objectives necessary to eliminate or minimize any threats to the resources and
integrity of the preserve. This text is a working document that establishes the foundation of the
ten-year plan by identifying the appropriate management techniques necessary to restore and
preserve the resource.
This plan will balance resource restoration and protection with natural resource-based
recreational and educational use while looking at restoration needs, listed species protection and
maintenance of the site free of invasive, exotic plant and animal species. This plan is divided
into sections that incorporate an introduction, descriptions of the natural and cultural resources,
projected uses of the property, management issues, and goals and objectives.
1.3 Location of the Milano Preserve
Milano Preserve is located approximately 2.10 miles east of Interstate 75 (1-75) between
Preserve Lane and Preserve Circle on the north side of lmmokalee Road (Figure I). The Milano
Preserve is in northwest Collier County in Section 21, Township 48 and Range 26.
Conservation Collier: Location of the Milano Preserve
IMMOKALEE RO
t
z
o
"
Z VANDERBILT SEA RO
. EXil1t1J
.
,
,
.
o
z
~
PIN RIDG RD PINE RIDGE RP T
o 2M,~
,
PRESERVELN
IMMOKALEE RO
< ,.75
..'50 5DOF..et
,
u"aS,,,,,,~ Pa'<el'-C"'"""c"",,,., "'W<f\,APP<8'_
:;,._"" ~_',e.I.l..,~..:~"Ol''''C<O_,' ~"','"
(,'~"""'''''''"",Call'''''''_'fA''''''''ed~'''"".....,
~_~...._.... ~"., ~~ r>'"":.t."'''''''''m'~''''o ;pg
......,,. ~00ll
M,",nc fOlio NUn1bers
0011l62BOOOJOO186J20002
(.;.71'" ClIlmty
Legend
_ Milano Preserve
- Collier County Roads
- Cocohatchee Canal
Figure I: General Location of Milano Preserve.
Conservatiun Collier Program
7
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazentl1mfi'I&hof 60
1.4 Regional Significance of the Milano Preserve
Ecosystem services such as the protection of water resources, flood control, maintenance of
nutrient cycles, preservation of biological diversity, carbon sequestration, and the availability of
recreational lands are imperative for the well-being of the citizens of Collier County and may be
achieved through the preservation of natural areas. As of April 2008, approximately 66% (over
860,000 acres) of all lands in Collier County were protected in conservation areas (Figure 2) and
managed by private, local, state and federal agencies (FNAI 2008). Collier County's
Conservation Collier Program manages the 18.46-acre Milano Preserve; it contains cypress,
cypress-pine-cabbage palm and pine flatwood communities. Specific information on the plant
communities found on the Milano Preserve may be found in section 2.3 (Natural Plant
Communities) of this document.
Location of Conservation Collier Program Lands
t
'''r' iij....:. '"
-.$J
,
"
.;,.-
1I.0,ell..
iIM~<l&<rubP,..."",
RRl..oJ>dTru..
V",ou, Ut,,'~)f>'~port,.. C
::;,\1.. !
'" r.. ",:;: .
. r=:'\ >a ==
I"..~~_."_r y..,..~' ~,:,";~':'7'1
~. __ """om' ~,,,..,
I ....- G<:)~:J[..u.'[r.,\fD
1CO<....,<_c""..P....""'( ~
......,;,,,,.,
.
~" ''''i Mu''*'
~
~
,.
....l"'f<o_. .E-
,~
"'~<y
P'flon
P...."'"
'n
GOO'dMR,y~
G'.......yF........
"A(lI('''O.
'-~ D"VlaBLVD -j1't'~ I
d..: . !~. <
!'~;t 'tr..,
t'\ J
.
\'."it~,-. ~." r )~'"/,!.
%.> 'Moll ., ~Ij>~
',:.;.,~. ~
,',":.. ~ '0' -.oP\Mcllv",",
;~i~~~i . MS ..'
Acquisition Status .. ~:>';~:,;y:.,'~:~,.L~' ~l
_ Acquired r',;'~4:;,,:.-r!;;:;<.'f',.' J'" ':: ,
_ Approved for Acquisition "-'\ j~\t:'~~;' ,,_,_.: " J_ .7
_..... Mill.alionI Con..rvalion Eas.m.n' :Ii., '<".'~l".(/...~,. ~. Ji
IBI State and Federal Conservation Land.., ""-'~"~fz,,~LJ
U:~ Lake Trafford ':"'/' . :'- i, ' -' ~>~',.'~,;,'r~~~..
,
lQ M."$
www.CollierGov.netlConservationC oilier
DOl. s.o..c~<>_. CoI...' C-O""",PI~"""~ "W.a1Wf
c'.....day~.c;""".'o!.""~.....nl'<:.""....-.-..IOI,c_.'. KlII\m
G'Conoe..."onCo.,.""""""",,,,,,,,",OPl'",""
""",","",&___M"J_,-::oa~.m'o~nd IPV
C.o""rv6~
cBffter County
-~
Figure 2: Conserved Lands in Collier County, Florida Including Lands Owned by Conservation
Collier.
Conservation Collier Program
8
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenRJmff'ldnof 60
1.5 Nearby Public Lands and Designated Water Resources
Currently, the closest preserved, natural areas to the Milano Preserve are the adjoining
conservation easements to the north and west managed by aide Cypress. Other preserves, in
order of increasing distance, are provided in table 2. Figure 3 shows the locations of these
preserves.
Table 2: Public Lands Located near the Milano Preserve
Name Approximate Direction T)'pe
Distance (miles)
Olde Cypress Conservation Area 0.00 (adjoining) N&NW Private
Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem V...'atershed 3.60 NE State
Rivers Road Project 3.62 E/SE Conservation Collier
Logan V./ oads Preserve 4.20 S Conservation Collier
Cocohatchee Creek Preserve 4.45 W Conservation Collier
Unit 53 Acquisition Boundary 4.50 NE Conservation Collier
Railhead Scrub Preserve 5.15 WINW Conservation Collier
Nancy Pay10n Preserve 5,60 S/SE Conservation Collier
Wet Woods Preserve 5.80 W/NW Conservation Collier
Delnor~Wiggins Pass State Park 7. ]5 W State
Barefoot Beach Preserve 740 W/NW County
~i\ ~~.
./ 7:U';'ds<,"np,no,.,.
BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE I 1'~ .------------1
.~::.--''''~:.::::.~.~~..~~~
I
DELNOR-WlGGINS PASS STATE PARK
I
I
n., I
I' ~c;,-;.~,;;,; c...~~:
:__.~~~~__ J
I~.j 0
I !I'~~'
'. c;, Cl.
: ~ ~
i ':j, :i
i 8 <j
..1 ~ PINE RIDGERD
ffij
I
I
Conservation Lands in the Vicinity of the Milano Preserve
: Lee County ~
........-....................-....,....... ...........___....___.. .........................-.--.-------..c___...,
Collier County
\
I
i
-:;531
'--.-.J
I
rMMOKALEE RD
,
\
'~R
II
R,.."N",,",
:'-'P"'!'<~_J
I
VANDERE!ILT8EACH
I
I ~~::'::':.'.J
';/
I .'t/
"
I
,
GOLDEN GATE BLVD
"
v
I
~..
P......
P...."'"
oX']
,t
2Mllu
Legend
_ Milano Prm>erve
ifJI Other Conservation Collier Progr.lm Lands
State and Federal Conservation Land
- Major Roads in Collier County
. .. Collier County Boundary
,-.."""".,~~. ._,C~~''',_;,..~.._
,....'..""........,,,
--;, .......,,_......,""'"
,~,-,-,._""..""""..,_....._........,~.,..."""....-
:::::;-;:~--....,...
('4ir"'l~.n'"
Figure 3: Preserves and Protected Lands in the Vicinity of Milano Preserve
Conservation Collier Program
9
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenHJn!fPlfinof 60
1.6 Public Involvement
Neighborhood involvement will be sought through direct mailing notices for public meetings to
residents, other preserve managers and businesses within 1,500 feet of the preserve boundaries.
Official public notices will be posted on the County website. Staff will seek to coordinate
management actions, such as exotic removal and prescribed fires with owners of adjoining lands.
Staff will also work together with the adjacent Homeowners Association ofthe Fairway Preserve
Condominiums, commercial property owners to the west and Olde Cypress to coordinate
management activities (e.g., exotic plant removal/treatment) and public access efforts.
2.0 Natural Resources
2.1 Physiography
Milano Preserve lies within the Floridian section of the Coastal Plain. The Coastal Plain extends
from New Jersey to Texas and was formed mainly from sedimentary rocks deposited in marine
environments (USGS 2004).
2.1.1 Topography and Geomorphology
The site is located in the Southwestern Slope region of the South Florida Water Management
District. According to the Bonita Springs, Florida USGS Topographic Map, the topography of
the area is relatively level with an average elevation of five feet above sea level and slopes gently
westward toward the Gulf of Mexico. Surface water percolates directly into the uncovered
ground or it collects in natural depressions and man made ponds on adjacent properties.
2.1.2 Geology
The geology of northern Collier County, where the Milano Preserve is located, is characterized
by complex sequences of interbeded sands, clays, and limestone. Closest to the surface is the
Holocene aged Pamlico Sand Formation, approximately ten feet thick and composed primarily of
unconsolidated quartz sand and some silt. The Pamlico Sand unconformably overlies the
Pleistocene aged Fort Thompson and Caloosahatchee Formations, which vary from a few feet to
more than twenty feet in thickness and are characterized by shelly and sandy limestone with vugs
and solution cavities (Miller 1986).
Below the Fort Thompson and Caloosahatchee Formations are the Ochopee and Buckingham
Members of the Pliocene aged Tamiami Formation, which are at least 200 feet thick in the
surrounding areas (Oaks & Dunbar 1974). The Ochopee Limestone unconfonnably overlies the
Buckingham Limestone and/or the equivalent Cape Coral Clay. This unconfonnity marks the
bottom of the surficial aquifer separating it from the brackish underlying aquifer below. Then
the Hawthorn Formation, rich in phosphate and other heavy minerals (Scott 1988), overlies the
Oligocene age Suwannee Limestone and Eocene age Ocala Limestone that form the Floridan
Aquifer System in Southwestern Florida. The Milano Preserve is located within the
Southwestern Slope. Geologically, this is the dominant feature of Collier County (Campbell
1990). Figure 4 provides a current aerial view of the Milano Preserve including the delineation of
the two parcels that make up the preserve.
Conservation Collier Program
10
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Presen'e Land ManazenflJmrF,G'nof 60
Conservation Collier: Aerial View of the Milano Preserve
Q 0025 DOC. Miles
I I
;:'01. "",,,," ~'.',e<. .no 21.oe ",.".". ::;oIl,e, Co,ml,' Proye", "Iopr."e!
'~r.Ol~d b'," F a.::II~I.< '....nBll"mo...' COl'l.~,...."O<1 ("'".rr~. "'an,,,
G'':O'I''',"!l1'onCall'",'''''..I4'''''''~'J..~.n'..\.
M'I.~"$,1"p tor F'n.II~.n.(I""""" PI."''''~"" m,d aM ,"'~ I.Manu ~"I", I Jumbers
,Iulv'~ 2.)0& C'~'1""';2~,CoJQ3 OC1i;lf,~~(.OO::>
("(;';-"'("",,,,Iy
Legend
I::J Milano Preserve '~
~'.n Collier County Roads J!
Cocohatchee Canal ,
Figure 4: Aerial View of the Milano Preserve Showing Delineation of Parcels
2.1.3 Soils
Mapped soils on this parcel were identified as Boca, riviera, limestone substratum & Copeland
fine sands, Oldsmar fine sand, Holopaw fine sand and Basinger fine sand (Figure 5).
Boca, riviera, limestone substratum & Copeland fine sands underlies 46% of the Milano Preserve
and is a wetland soil association found in depressional areas typical of cypress swamps and
marshes. Under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 months of the year. Natural
vegetation consists mostly of cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, alligator flag, sawgrass and willow
(Liudahl et al. 1990).
Oldsmar fine sand underlies 30% of the Milano Preserve and is the only non-hydric soil mapped
on this Conservation Collier property. Oldsmar fine sand is a nearly level and poorly drained
soil found in pine tlatwoods. During extended dry periods, the water table may recede to a depth
of 40+ inches, but under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is between a depth of
6-18 inches. Flora typically associated with this soil type includes: South Florida slash pine,
cabbage palm, saw palmetto and wax myrtle (Liudahl et al. 1990).
Conservation Collier Program
11
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManaeenfllmfPWnof 60
Conservation Collier: Mapped Soils on the Milano Preserve
Extent of Soils ~
_ BOCA, RIVIERA. LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS. DEPRESSIONAL (46%)
_ OLDSMAR FINE SAND (NON.HYDRIC; 30%) M',"MF",oNo'm"'''
;~'i :~~::::;; ~I~~ ~:~~ ~~:;;) CJ Milano Preserve ,,,,,,,,,,..,., f2:~3~~~~=::=,., +
250 Feet
,
Figure 5: Soil Units on the Milano Preserve
The hydric Holopaw fine sand underlies 23% of the Milano Preserve. This nearly level, poorly
drained soil is found in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. The permeability of water
through this soil is moderate to moderately slow and, under natural conditions, the seasonal high
water table is within a depth of J 2 inches for three to six months. Water recedes to a depth of
40+ inches during extended dry periods and, during times of high rainfall, the soil may be
covered with slowly moving water for approximately seven days. Flora typically associated with
this soil type includes South Florida Slash Pine, cypress, cabbage palm, saw palmetto and wax
myrtle (Liudahl et al. 1990).
Basinger fine sand underlies I % of the Milano Preserve and is a hydric, nearly level, poorly
drained soil found in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. The permeability of water
through this soil is rapid and, under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within a
depth of 12 inches for three to six months. Water recedes to a depth of 40+ inches during
extended dry periods and, during times of high rainfall, the soil may be covered with slowly
moving water for approximately seven days. Flora typically associated with this soil type
includes South Florida Slash Pine, cypress, cabbage palm, saw palmetto and wax myrtle (Liudahl
et al. 1990).
Conservation Collier Program
12
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflHlliJ'&fnof 60
2.1.4 Hydrology/Water Management
Near the surface, the aquifer is highly permeable and the groundwater flows toward the west.
However, permeability decreases downward from a porous limestone into poorly indurated
sandstone cemented by micrite. The aquifer grades from freshwater downward into brackish
water due to the proximity of the Gulf of Mexico to the west and the brackish water in the
intermediate aquifer made primarily of Miocene aged sediments. Below that, the Hawthorne
formation typically marks the upper boundary of the Floridian aquifer, which is contained within
the underlying Oligocene age Suwannee Limestone (Lodge 2005).
There is a berm that runs along the southern boundary of the Milano Preserve just north of the
Cocohatchee Canal. This berm prevents water from flowing southward consequently holding
water on the preserve for an artificially long period of time during the wet season.
The Surficial Aquifer is an aquifer close to the surface and unconfined, typically associated with
the groundwater table. This aquifer is generally limited to smaller uses such as household or
small agricultural uses. The Lower Tamiami aquifer is below this aquifer and is recognized as
being useful for long-term water needs. According to the South Florida Water Management
District's (SFWMD) technical publication 95-02 (Fairbank & Hohner 1995), the Surficial
Aquifer recharge capacity on the Milano Preserve is moderate at 43 to 56 inches annually. The
Lower Tamiami Aquifer recharge capacity on the preserve is relatively low at 7 to ] 4 inches
annually.
2.2 Climate
The Milano Preserve is located in an area of Florida where humid subtropical and tropical
savanna climatic patterns overlap, with temperatures moderated by winds from the Gulf of
Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. Sharply delineated wet and dry seasons and average monthly
temperatures greater than 640 Fahrenheit characterize a tropical savanna climate. Monthly
rainfalls may exceed ten inches during the wet season. On the other hand, humid subtropical
climates typically show less extreme rainfall fluctuations between wet and dry seasons and
average monthly temperatures is less than 640 Fahrenheit in some months.
The average annual temperature for the coastal portion of Collier County is approximately 750
Fahrenheit. The WaImest months are usually July and August. The humidity is high during
these months but frequent afternoon thunderstorms prevent excessively high temperatures.
Two-thirds ofthe annual rainfall occurs in the wet season from May to October. Thunderstorms
are frequent during the wet season, occurring every two out of three days between June and
September. Rainfall records for the area indicate that there is not significant variation in the
annual rainfall throughout much of the county; however, large variations often occur during a
single year. The Atlantic hurricane season extends from June through November with peak
activity occurring in September and October when ocean temperatures are highest.
2.3 Natural Plant Communities
A plant community refers to the suite of floristic species that form the natural vegetation of any
place. In addition to anthropogenic influences, the combination of factors such as geology,
topography, hydrology, underlying soils and climate determine the types of plants found in an
Conservation Collier Program
13
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enHJm~l!inof 60
area. These plants, in turn determine the animal species that may be found there. The
description or classifications of these floral communities differ by agency and are based on an
agency's goals and objectives for identifying plant communities. As some categorizations are
broad (e.g., forest) while others are specific (e.g., mesic pine flatwoods), determining how each
organization classifies a community may be difficult. The South Florida Vegetation
Classification Scheme Crosswalks (Gilbert 2005) provides a way to decipher the classifications
of plant communities across agencies. Appendix I provides the categorization of the plant
communities observed on the Milano Preserve based on the South Florida Vegetation
Classification Scheme Crosswalks; classifications from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory
(FNAI) are also included in this appendix.
The Florida Land Use, Land Cover Classification System (FLUCCS) created by the Southwest
Florida Water Management District in 1995 classifies plant communities and provides GIS
layers for users to overlay on property boundaries and aerial images to better determine the plant
communities found there. The FLUCCS designates three plant communities on the preserve:
Pine Flatwoods - Melaleuca Infested (FLUCCS 4119), Cypress - Melaleuca Infested (FLUCCS
6218), and Forested Mixed Wetlands (FLUCCS 630). Wilson Miller updated the FLUCCS data
layer in 2001. These data also indicate that there are three plant communities on the preserve,
however, the Pine Flatwood community is not identified, instead a Cypress (FLUCCS 621)
community is identified in addition to the Cypress- Melaleuca Infested community. Table 3
summarizes the plant communities mapped for the Milano Preserve in 1995 and 200 I; it shows
the differences in the location and extent ofland cover designations. Figure 6 visually represents
these land cover designations from 1995 and 2001. Given that the FLUCCS layers were
generated at a scale of I :24,000 and created by different entities at different times, the change in
the types and extent of plant communities between the map layers may indicate a change in
hydrology within the preserve or natural discrepancy generated when different entities perform
the same task. It is unlikely that these data were ground-truthed by the Water Management
District or Wilson Miller specifically on the Milano Preserve, however; both layers seem to be
fairly accurate in other parts of the County.
Table 3: Extent of Florida Land Use, Land Cover Classification System
Desi nations from 1995 and 2001 on the Milano Preserve
FLUCCS CODE Mapped Plant Community 1995 2001
4] 19 Pine Flat\.voods - Melaleuca Infested 45% 0%
621 Cypress 0% 12%
62]8 Cypress - Melaleuca Infested 43% 84%
630 Forested Mixed Wetlands 12% 4%
During site visits to the Milano Preserve, statf observed Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (FLUCCS
624), Cypress and Pine Flatwoods (FLUCCS 411) communities. These communities were in
varying states of exotic vegetation infestation. Additionally, a monoculture of Australian pines
(Casuarina spp.; FLUCCS 4370) was observed in the southeastern portion of the property.
Johnson Engineering ecologists conducting a preliminary wetlands and wildlife assessment of
the site in August 2004 reported observing similar vegetative communities. They categorized the
communities according to the degree of exotic infestation, described the pine flatwoods as
FLUCCS 4119 (disturbed) and noted that the cypress community contained scattered pine.
Conservation Collier Program
14
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenftJmf/'lilnof 60
Given the discrepancy between the 1995 and 2001 FLUCCS digital layers (as they pertain to the
Milano Preserve) and the removal of exotic vegetation since the acquisition of the property in
July 2006, staff created a new digital layer showing the location and extent of the native plant
communities currently found on the preserve (Sept. 2008; Figure 7). Because the removal of
invasive, exotic plants began in April 2008, this new layer does not reference any areas as
infested with exotic plant species except for the stand of Australian pines in the southeastern
portion of the preserve. Specific information on the invasive, exotic species present on the
preserve is provided in section 2.6.1 of this document.
The vegetation classification scheme of the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) and the
Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR) (1990) are presented in table 4. This table is
based on the plant communities observed on the Milano Preserve. The following subsections
(2.3.], 2.3.2, 2.3.3 and 2.3.4) provide information about the plant communities observed on the
preserve.
Table 4: Summary of Natural Communities on the Milano Preserve
FNAI Natural Communit)' Global State Comments
Tvoe Rank Rank
Strand Swamp G4 S4 Also called Fllnving Water Swamps and Cypress
communities
\"iet Flatlands G4 S4 Also called Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm communities and
Hvdric Pine Flat\\'oods
Mesic Flatwoocts G4 54 Also called Pine F1atwoods
G4: Apparently secure globally (may be rare in parts of range): S4: Apparently secure in f10rida (may be rare in parts arrange).
Conservation CD/lieI' Program
] 5
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazenflfl1J<PMlnof 60
A
Land Cover Designations (1995) on the Milano Preserve
Legend
c::J Milano Preserve Extent of Land Cover Designations ('95)
_ Pine Flatwoods . Melaleuca Infested (45'1.)
(.~n; ,C~It!,~
~~t."~=-,;,:--'- ;.-.-....-- _ Cypress. Melaleuca Infested (43%)
Z:::':.'7'':''':::.-~;;,:::,,,,--,,,-U--'' 001~~ _ Wetland Forested Mixed (12%)
125 250FeeI
,
B
Land Cover Designations (2001) on the Milano Preserve
126 2S0Feel
t"fi);"rauaIW
Legend
c:::::l Milano Preserve Extent of Land Cover Designations ('01)
_ Cypress - Malaleuca Infested (84%)
m Cypress (12%)
_ Wetland Forested Mixed W!.)
1;\<...,1...""",,,,,,,,
OC>llIlJ~~OO1!16:l2'.'OO:1
""...._ o-K___'- ,....'_'_"A'_
,;...",,,-,~--,,
c-..,__..._<---_..._., _
,.:_,____._._..,_....,__"'"'c...,_..
Figure 6: Distribution of Natural Communities on the Milano Preserve A) 1995 FLUCCS Layer, B)
2001 FLUCCS Layer
Conservation Collier Program
16
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!el1flJmcPl!inof 60
Field Verified Land Cover Designations ('08) on the Milano Preserve
o 125 250 Feet
,
cofJirrCollllty
Extent of Field Verified Land Cover on the Milano Preserve D01~~~~~~o~~';'2~002
c:J Milano Preserve
Cypress. Pine- Cabbge Palm (57%) _ Pine Flatwoods (18%)
_ Cypress (24%) _ Australian Pine (1%)
"...:....""..".......,.,""',_."".c...,c......,_.."."..,_
..., 'H""~'''., "'"........._~".............
:~.~, Of >.,,,....,, ..~...,.._ ~...,.".....c._... ......
" ~"'-"......~-"...~........."",.."'_.
~:,,;~~,:.,' "~'"",",,.~ -"~".''-''',""'"''-",
Figure 7: Extent of Plant Communities Currently Found on the Milano Preserve.
2.3.1 Wetlands: Cypress-PIne-Cabbage Palm
A cypress-pine-cabbage palm community comprises approximately 57% of the Milano Preserve
and is located primarily in the center portions of the preserve. This community dominates the
western boundary of the preserve and occupies a little over two thirds of the eastern boundary
(Figure 7).
Also known as wet tlatwoods, low tlatwoods, hydric tlatwoods (FNAl & FDNR 1990) and
hydric pine tlatwoods (USFWS 1999b) the cypress-pine-cabbage palm community typically
includes a canopy of cypress, pine (Pinlls spp.) and/or cabbage palm (Sohal palmetto) in
combinations in which none of the species achieves dominance. This assemblage forms a
transition between hydric sites (e.g., cypress communities) and moist upland sites (e.g., mesic
pine tlatwoods). This ecotonal community is unique to South Florida and functions as both a
wetland and upland at different times of the year. As such, both hydrology in the wet season and
fire in the dry season drive this dynamic systcm. As a result, this community is typically
dominated by a slash pine (Pinlls elliott!! var. demo) overstory with a wetland plant understory.
The wetland understory can be any, or a variety, of wetland plant community types ranging from
wet prairie to hatrack cypress. Hydric pine tlatwoods are distinct from mesic and xeric pine
tlatwoods in the absence of understory dominance by saw palmetto (Serenoa repcns) and more
COl1serl'atioll Collier Program
] 7
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflMJf/"Minof 60
xeric species such as pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida),
pawpaw (Asimina spp.), and prickly pear (Opuntia spp.).
The berm that runs along the southern boundary of the
Milano Preserve, just north of the Cocohatchee Canal,
prevents water from flowing southward consequently
holding water on the preserve for an artificially long
period of time during the wet season.
The cypress-pine-cabbage palm community provides
important forested habitat for a number of species often
found in wetlands and uplands. Wildlife species that
utilize this habitat include: the Florida black bear (Ursus
americanus jloridanus), Florida panther, wood stork, red-
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Everglades
snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), the recently
de-listed bald eagle, eastern indigo snake, gopher tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel
(Sciurus niger avicennia), Bachman's sparrow (Aimophila
aestivalis), bobcat (Lynx rufus), swallow-tailed kite
(Elanoides fOljicatus), Florida weasel (Mus/ela frena/a
peninsulae), limpkin (Aramus guarauna), northern harrier
(Circus cyaneus), southeastern kestrel (Falco sparverius
paulus), eastern American kestrel (F. s. :.parverius) and the Florida sandhill crane (Grus
canadensis pra/ensis). Additionally, this community provides essential habitat to the breeding
life cycle of aquatic and wetland-dependent animals, and a major forest cover for cover-
dependent species. Hydric pine flatwoods provide aquatic habitat for both young and adult
amphibians and adult tree frog climbing areas. Hydric tlatwoods serve as wading bird foraging
areas, black bear foraging, denning, and travel ways, and essential red-cockaded woodpecker
foraging and nesting habitat (USFWS I 999b).
Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm Community
within the Milano Preserve.
Photo bv Annisa Karim
Since the cypress-pine-cabbage palm community comprises a majority of the preserve, all soils
identified on the preserve (Boca, riviera, limestone substratum & Copeland fine sands, Oldsmar
fine sand, Holopaw fine sand and Basinger fine sand) are found within this community.
2.3.2 Wetlands: Cypress
A Cypress community dominates approximately 24% of the northern portion of the Milano
Preserve. One hundred percent of the northern boundary of the preserve contains this plant
community (Figure 7).
Also known as flowing water swamps (Gilbert 2005), cypress stands, stringers and strand
swamps (FNAI & FDNR 1990), these forested cypress communities are shallow, seasonally
inundated and commonly found along and within drainage channels (USFWS I 999a). Deeper
parts of this community may be characterized as a cypress slough. The hydrology of an area
drives the formation of cypress communities (Sullivan 1994). Additionally, light surface fires
every 30 to 200 years are essential to the maintenance of these communities. Without these fires,
invasion by hardwoods and peat accumulation would degrade this community.
Conservation Collier Program
18
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Mana>!enflJmrFMnof 60
The canopy of the cypress community within the
Milano Preserve is dominated by cypress (Taxodium
sp.) and contains popash (Fraxinus caroliniana),
strangler fig (Ficus aurea) and red maple (Acer
rubrum). The midstory contains swamp dogwood
(Corn us Joemina), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera),
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis). Groundcover
species include alligator flag (Thalia genicula/a),
swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and false nettle
(Boehmeria cylindrica).
In a landscape context, the presence of highly
functioning cypress communities within a matrix of
other types of wetland and upland communities is
imperative for many species of wildlife, including listed
species. Listed species that benefit with the presence of
the cypress community on the Milano Preserve include
the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), wood stork (Myc/eria americana), Kirtland's warbler
(Dendroica kirtlandii), and eastern indigo snake (Dlymarchon corai, couperi). The recently de-listed
bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is also a species that benefits from the presence of cypress
communities (USFWS 1999a).
The berm that runs along the southern boundary of the Milano Preserve, just north of the Cocohatchee
Canal, prevents water from flowing southward consequently holding water on the preserve for an
aI1iticially long period of time during the wet season. This results in deeper water in the cypress area than
is normally scen in other naturally functioning cypress areas. The cypress community within the preserve
is underlain with depressional Boca, riviera, limestone substratum & Copeland fine sands and Basinger
fine sand.
Cypress Community lNithin the Milano Preserve.
Photo bv Christal SeQura
2.3.3 Uplands: Pine Flatwoods
A Pine Flatwood community dominates approximately 18% of the Milano Preserve. This plant
community is located in the southeastern portion of the property and comprises over 50% of the
southern boundary (Figure 7).
Pine flatwoods are one of the most wide-ranging terrestrial plant communities in Florida and
consequently one of the most influenced by anthropogenic activities (Abrahamson & Hartnett
1990). Fire strongly influences the community structure and composition of these communities.
The term pine flatwoods is a general categorization of areas that are dominated by various
species of pine (Pinus spp.) trees. Pine flatwoods may be found in mesic flatlands where the
landscape is made up of flat, modcrately well drained sandy substrates with a mixture of organic
material, often with an underlying hard pan layer. An open canopy forest of widely spaced pine
trees with little or no understory but a dense ground cover of herbs and shrubs characterize
natural, mesic flatwoods that have been burned regularly (FNAI & FDNR 1990). The USDA
Soil Conservation Service classification system refers to these areas as South Florida flatwoods.
South Florida flatwoods are typically savannas, a type of plant community intermediate between
forest and grassland.
Conservation Collier Program
19
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!en'i/JmrFllinof 60
Mesic pine flatwoods are also called mesic flatwoods, pine savanna, cabbage palm savanna, and
pine barrens. Oldsmar fine sand and Holopaw fine sand underlies this part of the preserve. The
berm that runs along the southern boundary of the Milano Preserve, just north of the
Cocohatchee Canal, prevents water from flowing southward consequently holding water on the
preserve for an artificially long period of time during the wet season. As a result, this
community holds comparably more water than other naturally functioning mesic pine flatwoods.
Common mesic pine flatwood species such as saw palmetto, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera),
cabbage palm and saffron plum (Sideroxylon celastrinum) are found in this portion of the
preserve. Additionally, species usually found in wet areas such as sawgrass (Cladium
jamaicense), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and wiregrass (Aristida stricta var.
. .' beyrichiana) are found in the pine flatwood
portion of the Milano Preserve.
Mesic flatwoods provide essential forested
habitat for a variety of wildlife species
including Neotropical migratory birds, wide-
ranging large carnivores, mid-sized
carnivores, ground-nesting vertebrates, tree-
cavity dependent species, tree-nesting species
and non-aquatic plant life. "At the current
rate of habitat conversion, the mesic pine
flatwoods, once the most abundant upland
habitat in South Florida, is in danger of
becoming one of the rarest habitats in South
Florida" (USFWS 1999c).
Mesic pine f1atwoods within the Milano Preserve.
Photo by Christal Segura
2.3.4 Uplands: Australian Pine
A stand of invasive, exotic Australian pines comprises approximately 1% of the Milano Preserve
and its description is included in this section (2.3 Natural Plant Communities) to provide a
comprehensive assessment of the entire Milano Preserve. Invasive, exotic species are discussed
in more detail in section 2.6 (Invasive, Non-native and Problem Species) of this document. The
Australian pine monoculture is located in the southeastern portion of the property on the eastern
edge of the pine flatwood community. Australian pines comprise the canopy and there are no
midstory or understory plant species. The smaller Australian pines were removed in late April
2008 and the larger trees are scheduled to be removed in 2009. Figure 7 reflects the extent of
this community after the smaller trees were removed.
2.4 Native Plant and Animal Species
A cypress-pine-cabbage palm community comprises the majorIty (57%) of the l8.46-acre
Milano Preserve. Smaller areas of the preserve are comprised of cypress (24%) and pine
flatwoods (18%) communities; a small stand of Australian pines (I %) also exists on the preserve.
This section discusses the flora and fauna found within these plant communities. The next
section (2.5) discusses all listed species in greater detail.
Conservation Collier Proi,ry'am
20
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Prese,,'e Land Manai!e~rPl8nof 60
2.4.1 Plant Species
To date, 63 plant species have been recorded on the preserve (Appendix 2). Conservation
Collier staff conducted a preliminary floristic inventory in August and September 2008.
Another survey will be conducted in late fall 2009 and the final list will be added to this plan. Of
these 63 species, 55 (87%) are native - of which, four are listed by the State of Florida (two are
listed as endangered; one is listed as threatened; one is listed as commercially exploited).
2.4.2 Animal Species
Due to the dearth of specific surveys for the occurrence of animal species (in contrast to plants)
and the lack of on-site staffing, little is recorded for actual occurrences of animals at the Milano
Preserve. Occurrences of fauna at the preserve are based on direct visual and aural observations
by staff during site visits or evidence of activity such as spoor, scat, or burrows, and from the site
information available in
documents such as the
site's initial criteria
screening report, the
property's interim
management plan and
anecdotal information
from persons with
knowledge of the site.
Table 5 provides a
comprehensive list of
animals, both native and
non-native, recorded on
the Milano Preserve
thus far.
Table 5: Faunal Species Recorded on the Milano Preserve
Common Name Scientific Name
American Robin Turdus migratorius
Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Polioptila caeru/ea
Blue Jay (~l'anocitta cristata
Cedar Waxwing Bomhycilla cedrorlll11
Common Ground-Dove Columbina passerina
Great Crested FI)'catcher Myiarchus crinitus
Great Egret Ardea alha
Mourning Dove Zenaida mGCrOlira
Northern Mockingbird Mimus po(vglotfos
Prothonotary V/arbler Protonotaria citrea
Red-bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus
Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus
\Vhite-eyed Vireo 'iireo grise us
Florida Black Bear Urslls americanusjloridanus
Racoan Procyon lotor
Brown anole a Anolis sagrei
Bluestripe Ribbon snake Thamnophis sallritlls nitae
Monarch butterfly Danaus plexipPlls
GulfFrilillary butterfly Agralllis vanillae
Zebra Longwing butterfly Heliconills charitonius
Florida Ivory millipede Chicobolu.'l spinigerus
Crab-like Spiny Orbv/eaver spider Gasteracantha cancrtformis
Red imported fire ant a Solenopsis invicta
a Non-native species , ,. . ,
Conservation Collier Program
21
Agenda Item No. 15E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManGlzenflJn!cFMnof 50
The Florida Breeding Bird Atlas (FFWCC 2003) lists 49 avian species that have been recorded
as confirmed, probable, or possible breeding in the vicinity of the site (Table 6). The Breeding
Bird Atlas documents breeding distributions of all bird species in Florida between ] 986 and
]991. Some of these species may breed at the Milano Preserve.
Other wildlife species that have not yet been recorded undoubtedly occur at the Milano Preserve.
During migration periods, transient bird species would be expected to utilize this area for short
periods of time. The developed character of the adjacent areas may inhibit transient use by many
mammal, reptile, and amphibian species, thus limiting the utilization of the preserve to resident
individuals or inhibiting the dispersal of many species to and from the preserve.
Table 6: Breeding Bird Species Recorded in the Corkscrew SW Quadrangle
Encom passing the Milano Preserve
Common Name Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name
Green Heron Sutorides "irescens Red-cockaded Picoides borealis
Woodpecker
Y ellow-crovmed Night-Heron !v~vctal1assa violacea Northern Flicker Co{aptes auratus
Wood Duck A Ix sponsa Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus
Mottled Duck AnasfulviguJa Great Crested Flycatcher Myiarchus crinitus
Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forflcatlls Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus
Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatlls \Vhite-eyed Vireo I 'ireo griseus
Northern Bobwhite Colinus virgin/anus Blue Jay Cyanocitta cr;sfafa
King Rail Rallus elegans Fish Crow Corvus ossifragus
Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus Purple Martin Progne subis
Limpkin Aramus guarauna Northern Rough~winged Stelg;doptelYx
Swallow serrinennis
Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Tufted Titmouse Bae%ph;s bicolor
Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Carolina Wren 1711yothorus
ludovicianus
Common Ground-Dove Columhina passerina Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Poliopfilia caerulea
*Ho:-;c-rillf'cd P:mlked !'S;{{UCII/O knllllC/'i Northern Mockingbird Aiimus polyglottos
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccy::us americanus Brmvn Thrasher Toxostoma rufum
Barn Owl Tyto alba Northern Parula Parula americana
Eastern Screech~Owl Afegascops asio Pine Warbler Dendraica pinus
Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus Prairie Warbler Dendra;ca discolor
Barred Owl Strix varia Common Yellov..ihroat Geoth(vp;s trichas
Common Nightha\vk Chordeiles minor Eastern Towhee Pipilo
ervfhrovhlhalmus
Chuck.will's.widow Caprimulgus carolinensis Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes elJ,throcephalus Rcd~winged Blackbird Age/aius phoeniceus
Red~bellied Woodpecker Me/anerpes carolinus Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna
Downy Woodpecker Picoides puhescens Common Grackle Quiscalusquiscula
'" = 1101I-l/alll'c' \pecic.\' Boat-tailed Grackle Quiscalus major
Conservation Collier Program
22
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Mana'i!enflJn!f/"Mnof 60
2.5 Listed Species
Official lists ofrare and endangered species are produced at the federal level by the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service and at the State level by the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Florida Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services. FNAI produces a list of rare and endangered species, and maintains a
database of occurrences of these species in Florida. The Institute for Regional Conservation
(lRC) also ranks native plant species by conservation status in the 10-county area of South
Florida. The following subsections (2.5.] and 2.5.2) discuss the listed, rare and protected plant
and animal species found within and close to the Milano Preserve in detail.
2.5.1 Listed Plant Species
The Florida State Statute titled "Preservation of native flora of Florida" (Statute 581.185)
provides the following definitions:
o Endangered plants means species of plants native to the state that are in imminent
danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a
decline in the number of plants continue, and includes all species determined to be
endangered or threatened pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended, Pub. L. No. 93-205 (87 Stat. 884).
o Threatened plants means species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the
number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in such number as to
cause them to be endangered.
o commerciallv exploited plants means species native to the state, which are subject to
being removed in significant numbers from native habitats in the state and sold or
transported for sale.
There are four (4) plant species at Milano Preserve that are listed by the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDAcS), two (2) as endangered, one (1) as threatened, and
one (1) as commercially exploited (Table 7). A brief description of these species and their status
is included in the following paragraphs.
Table 7: Listed Plant Species Detected at the Milano Preserve
Common Name(s) Scientific Name State
StitT-leaved \vild-pine, Cardinal airplant Tit landsia Iasciculala E
Fuzzywuzzy airplant, Hoar)' airplant Tit/ondsia pruinosa E
Retlcxed viild-pine. Northern needlelcaf Tifla/Jd.\'ia ha!bisiana T
Royal fern Oslltllllda rcgalis var. spectabilis C
T: Threatened; E: Endangered; C: Commercially Exploited
Three of the four listed plant species found on the Milano Preserve are classified as bromeliads.
Bromeliads are members of the pineapple family (Bromeliaceae). While some of these species
may be found growing terrestrially, most native bromeliads found in Florida are found growing
attached to tree trunks and branches and may therefore be referred to as epiphytes (a plant that
lives upon other plants; from Greek "epi" = upon "phyte" = plant). The leaves and/or roots of
these airplants (depending on the species) absorb the water and nutrients they need from the air
and from the rain that falls through the canopy of the tree on which they are found. Since
epiphytes use their roots only to anchor themselves (0 another plant, they are considered non-
parasitic. Even though the three listed bromeliad species found on the Milano Preserve are fairly
C onservaliun Collier Program
23
Agenda Item No. 15E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!<P'!&nof 50
common in the state, they are listed due to illegal collecting and the destruction of the habitats in
which they are found. Additionally, infestation by the introduced Mexican bromeliad weevil
(Melamasius callizona) has been implicated in the decline of many airplant populations around
the state. Currently, there are no control measures in place however, close research and
monitoring is taking place.
Stiff-leaved Wild Pine (Tillandsia fasdculata), is
also known as cardinal airplant and common wild
pine. T fasciculala is listed as an endangered plant by
the State of Florida and has been in 24 counties
throughout Florida (Wunderlin & Hansen 2008). This
epiphyte was frequently found in South Florida before
the introduction of the Mexican bromeliad weevil.
Today, it may be found in hammocks, cypress swamps
and pinelands.
TiJ/andsiafasciculata;
Photo by Annisa Karim
Like most of the other bromeliads in Florida, this species is often
referred to as a "tank" bromeliad because the leafaxils and central
stems form a "tank" or reservoir at the base of the plant. These
reservoirs capture and hold water, dead and decaying plant matter
(leaves, seeds twigs, etc.), and dead and drowning non-aquatic
insects; these trapped items provide nutrients for the plant (Larson
et al. 2006).
View of T. fasciculafa with water in the "tank".
Photo by Annisa Karim
Reflexed wild pine (Tillandsia balbisiana) is an epiphytic, "tank"
bromeliad and is listed as a threatened plant by the State of Florida.
Wunderlin and Hansen reported this species in 22 counties throughout
Florida as of 2008 (Wunderlin & Hansen 2008). Reflexed wild pine is
an occasional species in South Florida and is usually found in scrub,
pinelands, strand swamps, hammocks, mangrove swamps and on shell
ridges/mounds.
Tillandsia balbisiana
Photo bv Annisa Karim
C onservalion Collier Program
24
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Prese,,'e Land Mana<!enflJn!rJYRilnaf 60
Royal fern (Osmunda rega/is var. spectabilis) is not in danger of being
extirpated in Florida because of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation or
attack by an exotic, invasive pest, but because of commercial
exploitation. According to Nelson (2000), the fibers from the stem of
royal fern have been used as a growing medium to grow orchids as well
as to make ropes and nets. Additionally, this species is believed to have
medicinal benetits; other parts of the plant
may have been used to treat wounds and broken bones, relieve sprains
and to help alleviate coughs and diarrhea. In Florida, this species is
found in hydric areas such as wet flatwoods, cypress swamps,
floodplains, stream banks and bogs.
Osmunda regalis vaL spectabilis
Photo by Annisa Karim
FNAI maintains a database of occurrences of rare, threatened, and endangered species in Florida.
An element is any exemplary or rare component of the natural environment, such as a species,
natural community, bird rookery, spring, sinkhole, cave, or othcr ecological feature. An element
occurrence is a single, extant habitat that sustains or otherwise contributes to the survival of a
population or a distinct, selt:sustaining example of a particular element.
These element occurrence data are built into biodiversity matrices. Each matrix encompasses
one (1) square mile and includes all species and natural communities tracked by FNA], including
all federal listed species. The FNAI report for the matrix in which the Milano Preserve is located
identifies three likely elements and 18 potential elements. Of the three likely elements, one has
been observed on the preserve, namely mesic pine flatwoods (described in section 2.3.3 of this
document). None of the 18 potential elements reported by FNAI have been detected within the
preserve. Appendix 3 provides the FNAI Managed Area Tracking Record and Element
Occurrence Summary as well as the Biodiversity Matrix Report. Global and state rankings are
provided for each species as well as their federal and state status.
2.5.2 Listed Animal Species
While no listed wildlife species have been observed on the Milano Preserve, according to a 2004
Preliminary Wetlands and Wildlife Assessment prepared by Johnson Engineering, the property is
within the Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary Wood Stork Core Foraging Area (18.6 miles), a
documented wood stork rookery. The report also states that research of SFWMD Permit I 1-
01232-S indicated that "The Woodlands" (the adjacent Olde Cypress preserve property) at one
time supported a viable population of Big Cypress fox squirrels and provided some nesting and
foraging habitat for listed wading birds.
The wood stork (Mycteria americana)
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWcc) and by the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list the wood stork as an endangered species. Also known
as the wood ibis or flint head, this species is one of the largest wading birds found in Florida and
the only stork in the United States. The wood stork is a tactile feeder and may be found in fresh,
Conservation Collier Program
25
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!fiYMinof 60
brackish, and saltwater habitats. Because of its dependence on naturally functioning hydrologic
systems, the National Audubon Society refers to this wading bird as the "barometer of the
Everglades". For this reason, the wood stork is an excellent environmental indicator of wetland
health (Mazziotti 2002).
The Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sdurus niger avicennia)
Also known as the mangrove fox squirrel, the FFWcc lists this species as threatened in Florida.
While the species is widespread in eastern and central North America, the subspecies is endemic
to southwestern Florida - specifically in the lmmokalee Rise, Big Cypress Swamp, and Devil's
Garden area in Collier County. Some areas of this range have become vacated, while many other
suitable areas are being altered or becoming isolated through development. The subspecies uses
most types of forest occurring in its range. However, dense interiors of mixed cypress-hardwood
strands seem to be avoided by Big Cypress fox squirrels due dense populations of gray squirrels
(Sciurus carolinensis) occupying these areas. Big Cypress fox squirrels have been reported in
cypress swamp, pine flatwood, tropical hammock, hardwood hammock, mangrove swamp, and
suburban habitats including golf courses, and residential areas in native vegetation. Big Cypress
fox squirrel densities appear to be quite low, and on this basis the subspecies can be considered
inherently rare (Humphrey & Jodice 1992).
Three wildlife species were reported as likely to occur (rare species likely to occur on the site
based on suitable habitat and/or known occurrences in the vicinity) and eleven species were
reported as potential occurrences (site lies within the known or predicted range of species) within
FNAl's Biodiversity Matrix for the Milano Preserve. Appendix 3 provides the FNAI Managed
Area Tracking Record and Element Occurrence Summary as well as the Biodiversity Matrix
Report. Global and state rankings are provided for each species as well as their federal and state
status.
2.6 Invasive, Non-native and Problem Species
]n an ecological context, an invasive species is one that is aggressive in growth and expansion of
range and tends to dominate others; its establishment and dominance can cause widespread harm
to an ecological system by altering the species composition, susceptibility to fire and hydrology
of an area. Non-indigenous species (i.e., non-native or exotic species) are those that have been
introduced purposefully or accidentally to an area outside their normal range. The characteristics
of some of these species (high rate of growth/reproduction, no natural predators, easily dispersed,
able to out-compete native species) make them invasive. Some indigenous species (a species
whose natural range included Florida at the time of European contact circa 1500 AD or a species
that has naturally expanded or changed its range to include Florida) may also become invasive.
Invasions by native and non-native species often follow an alteration to ecosystem function,
disruption of the food web, large-scale fragmentation of an ecosystem and/or disturbance (e.g.,
clearing, fire, drought, etc) of an area. While some native species may become invasive, the
establishment and dominance of non-native species is of particular concern. The exotic plant
and animal species documented within the preserve and those that have a potential to occur
within the preserve are discussed in the following sections.
Conservation Collier Program
26
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManarzenflJn!cPlJihof 60
2.6.11nvasive and Problem Plant Species
The Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC) maintains a list of exotic plants that have been
documented to (1) have adverse effects on Florida's biodiversity and plant communities, (2)
cause habitat loss due to infestations and (3) impact endangered species via habitat loss and
alteration. To date, eight non-indigenous plant species have been detected within Milano
Preserve (Table 8), accounting for 13% of the plant species recorded there. Of the eight exotic
species, six are listed by FLEPPc (five Category I and one Category ll). FLEPPc defines
Category [ plants as those that alter native plant communities by displacing native species,
change community structures or ecological functions, or hybridize with natives. Category II
plants have increased in abundance or frequency but have not yet altered Florida plant
communities to the extent shown by Category I species. These definitions do not rely on the
economic severity or geographic range of the problem, but rather on the documented ecological
damage caused by these plants (FLEPPc 2007).
Table 8: Invasive Plant Species at Milano Preserve
Scientific Name Common ~ames FLEPPC
Catel!orv
Acacia auriculif{}rmis Earlcaf acacia I
Casuarina sp. Australian pine I
Cupaniopsis anacardioides C<lrrot\Vood I
,\lelaleuca quinquenervia Punk tree. Melalcuca Paper bark I
Sellinus terebil11hifi:J!ius Brazilian nenner I
Urena lohala C aesarweed II
Emilia {osbendi Florida tassleflO\vcr
Spernwcoce verticillata Shruhhv false buttonweed
As of the acquisition of the Milano Preserve by the Conservation Collier program on July 28,
2006, the most problematic exotic, invasive plant species were melaleuca (Melaleuca
quinquenervia), Australian pine and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). A Collier County
approved contractor, started the initial treatment of these exotics on April 28, 2008. The
following paragraphs outline the methods they used to chemically treat these exotics dependent
on the species and location of treatment.
For the 75-foot perimeter buffer (3.17 acres; Figure 8), all woody invasive species, primarily
melaleuca and earleaf acacia, were manually cut and the stem removed from the buffer. The cut
stems were stacked within the interior of the property, but outside of the perimeter buffer. The
remaining stumps were treated with a dye-laced herbicide. All saplings (<3 feet tall) and
herbaceous, invasive species were killed-in-place (KIP) with a dye-laced herbicide.
Conservation Collier Program
27
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manal!enflJn!(['l,fnof 60
In the interior of the property (14.2 I acres; Figure 8), field crews used the frill-and-girdIe (K]P)
method for large trees [>4 inches DBH (diameter at breast height)] and small trees (<4 inches
DB H) were cut and stacked
within the interior of the
property. The material was
stacked in a "log cabin"
formation with each "cabin"
being spaced at least 50-75
feet apart. All trees frilled-
and-girdled and any remaining
stumps were treated with a
dye-laced herbicide. All
saplings (<3 feet tall) and
herbaceous invasive species
were killed-in-pIace with a
dye-laced herbicide.
The smaller Australian pine
trees in the southeast comer
(1.08 acres; Figure 8) were cut
by chainsaw. All remaining
stumps were treated with a
dye-laced herbicide. The larger
Australian pine trees
remammg on site are located
on the extreme eastern edge of
the Australian pine area.
These trees are large (>4
inches DBH) and will be
removed in early 2009.
Qj,TE; 1)S.1!i-m
,
I
co.tlER COh'Sf.RVJt..HO~PROPERTY I
:('(IJ"'f.XOllCVEGt,",HOtO ffiE:.A''''ENT I
..at LI~R CCYJ""" FtO/lll')4
I
"..._1__.....
"__"""'1_
'';;\~'I\::=
.......-.
F1ltTrull-.........._%,;,.,c.,,"IiI
f"ROSClIiQ t.WICllo
ol.1JllAl.ICJn;Il.....,p.""\r.-:
SCALE.: l' ';'SO'
Figure 8: Initial Exotic Vegetation Treatment Map for the Milano Preserve.
2.6.2 Invasive and Problem Animal Species
Although Florida does not have an official exotic, invasive animal species list, at least 400 exotic
fish and wildlife animal species have been reported in Florida, and approximately 125 species
are established.
Two non-indigenous, invasive animal species have been documented on the preserve: red
imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) and brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Based on the natural
communities found within the preserve, proximity to residential areas and geographic location,
several more species (native and non-native) have the potential to impact the Milano Preserve to
varying degrees. Brief descriptions of documented and undocumented but potentially
problematic species are provided in the following paragraphs.
Conservation Collier Prop'am
28
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!fiYldnaf 60
Red imported fire ant (Solel1opsis il1victa): documented within the Milano Preserve
These social insects were introduced into the U.S. from Brazil
into either Mobile, Alabama or Pensacola, Florida between 1933
and] 945 (Collins & Scheffrahn 2005) and have been detected in
the Milano Preserve. Red imported fire ants (R]F A) have been
documented to cause harm to humans and wildlife as well as
economic harm (Stimac & Alves 1994; Collins & Scheffrahn
2005; Willcox & Giuliano, 2006). R]F As are omnivorous, but
they prefer insects as their primary food source (Willcox &
Giuliano 2006). RIFAs have a number of impacts on wildlife; in
many areas, they have eliminated native ant populations through
competition and predation and have eradicated food sources
utilized by some wildlife species. Ground-nesting wildlife is
especially susceptible to RIF As. Within the Milano Preserve,
RIF As have the potential to affect ground-nesting birds; small mammals; reptiles, native lizard
and snake species, and native invertebrates (Willcox & Giuliano 2006). Additionally, members
of the public that come into contact with RIF As may be harmed if stung. Many people have
anaphylactic reactions to the toxins released from R]F A stings.
Brown Anole (Al1olis sagrel): documented within the Milano Preserve
Also knmvn as the Cuban anole, the brown anole is native to Cuba,
the Bahamas, and neighboring islands (Schwartz & Henderson
1991). Like other anoles from the islands, this species is a small,
tropical, diurnal, arboreal, territorial, and insectivorous lizard
(Campbell 2001). The brovm anole was first documented in the
Florida Keys in the late 1800s (Lee 1985) and has since spread
throughout Florida, into Georgia and into
two other southeastern states (Campbell
1996). The brown anole is a habitat
generalist and generally prefers the fairly
open areas of disturbed sites. It feeds on
a wide variety of insects, amphipods, and
isopods. Brown anoles also prey on other
small vertebrates including the hatchlings of the native green anole
(A. carolil1ensiis; Campbell 2000).
Campbell (2000) showed that, in the absence of the exotic brown
anoles, native green anoles occupy perches from ground to the
canopy of vegetation. However, in the presence of the exotic anole, native anoles move higher
in trees, occupying only the trunk and crown of trees. Dietary overlap is high between both
species, but the overall affects of the brown anole on the green anole are still undeternlined.
AnoUs sagrei, an invasive, exotic
reptile documented in the Milano
Preserve. Photo courtesy of the
USGS.
Solenopsis invicta, an invasive, non-indigenous
arthropod documented within the Milano
Preserve. Photo courtesy of the USDA.
;-
~ .........:,'
~~:1.'-~
..\..""-. _~1.. '
_ ~:.l
Ana/is care/inens/ls, an indigenous
reptile documented in the Milano
Preserve. Photo courtesy of the
USGS
Conservation Collier Program
29
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManarzenflJn!rPlanof 60
Coyote (Canis latrans): undocumented within the Milano Preserve
Coyotes were introduced in very small numbers to Florida during the 1920's for sport hunting
with domestic dogs. This introduction did not lead to the establishment of coyote populations in
Florida. Concurrently, these canids expanded their range eastward across the United States and
Canada as a result of nonspecific needs in habitat and food, decreased competition from other
predators, large litter sizes and anthropogenic changes to the landscape. Since many species
naturally expand or change their home ranges in response to climate and resource availability,
the coyote may be considered native to Florida. This crepuscular (active mostly at dawn and
dusk) species is elusive and may travel individually or in groups of two or three (Coates et al.
1998). Coyotes commonly enlarge burrows made by other animals such as armadillos or gopher
tortoises to use as dens or use dense vegetation for cover. Coyotes may have a negative
influence on indigenous wildlife as direct predators or as potential competitors with predators
that may occur at the preserve such as foxes (Urocyon cinereoargentew) or bobcats (Lynx rufus
jloridanus); however, this species may prove beneficial in controlling potential problem species
such as feral cats.
Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis): undocumented within the Milano Preserve
Like the Cuban anole, the Cuban tree frog is native to Cuba, the
Bahamas, and neighboring islands. The first Cuban tree frogs
probably arrived in the Florida Keys as stowaways in shipping
crates originating from the Caribbean in the 1920's. Today, they
have established breeding populations as far north as Cedar Key on
Florida's Gulf Coast, Jacksonville on the Atlantic Coast, and
Gainesville in north-central Florida. These hylids are the largest
tree frog found in Florida and because of their ability to invade
natura] areas and prey on native invertebrates and small vertebrates
(including native tree frogs) they are considered an invasive
species. Additionally, the tadpoles of this species inhibit the
growth and development of the tadpoles of the native southern toad
(Bufo terrestris) and green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). Cuban tree
frogs thrive in residential and natural areas such as pine forests, hardwood hammocks, and
swamps. ]n residential settings, they are most commonly found on and around homes and
buildings, and in gardens and landscape plants. They are known to get into transformer boxes
and electrical switches causing power outages (Johnson 2007). Due to the natural communities
that are found within the Milano Preserve and its proximity to residential areas, this species has
the potential of occurring in the preserve.
Osteopilus septentrionaBs, an invasive,
exotic af11lhibian that has the potential to
occur at the Milano Preserve. Photo
courtesy of the USGS.
Conservation Collier Program
30
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazentlJmf/'lanof 60
Giant Marine Toad or Cane Toad (Bufo marin us): nndocumented within the Preserve
The cane toad is a tropical
species native to the
Amazon basin in South
America, and its range
extends through Central
America to extreme
southern Texas along the
Rio Grande River. They are
used as a control agent for
insects that damage
sugarcane and
consequently, are one of the
most introduced amphibian
species in the world. In 1936, an attempt was made to introduce this species into Palm Beach
County, FL. This attempt failed as did two subsequent efforts. Ironically, in ] 955, an accidental
release by an importer at the Miami ]nternational Airport in Miami-Dade County, FL proved
successful. They have since been deemed an invasive species in Florida and are currently found
in urban areas of south and central Florida, and are rapidly expanding northward (Brandt &
Mazziotti 2005). Many of this species' characteristics enable it to do well in south Florida.
Beetles, bees, ants, winged termites, crickets and bugs are a large part of the diet of the adult
marine toad. Additionally, they consume arthropods, mollusks, small vertebrates, plant matter,
pet food, carrion, household scraps, marine snails, smaller toads and native frogs, small snakes,
and even small mammals. Marine toads are prolific breeders and females can lay tens of
thousands of eggs in a single breeding season. They prefer forested areas with semi permanent
water nearby (Churchill 2003). The cane toad looks very similar to the native, southern toad, but
there are some distinct differences. The most obvious difference is adult body size (length of
body not counting the legs). Adult marine toads can reach lengths of 6 -9 inches while the native
southern toads only reach a length of 3.6 inches. Like other true toads, both possess poisonous,
parotid glands. The parotid glands of the cane toad are angled downward behind their head to
their shoulders. The southern toad has a kidney-shaped parotid gland behind each eye positioned
close to the spine. The southern toad also possesses cranial crests that start between the eyes
and often end in big knobs. While the parotid glands of all toads contain bufotoxins (poisonous,
milky fluids exuded as a defense mechanism). the chemicals released by the exotic, cane toad are
much more harmful to wildlife, pets and people (Brandt & Mazziotti 2005). Due to the natural
communities that are found within the Milano Preserve and its proximity to residential areas, this
species has the potential of occurring within the preserve. Adjoining residents of the preserve
should be encouraged to keep pet food and water containers indoors or empty at night.
Buto marinus, an invasive, exotic amphibian thai
has the potential to occur at the Milano Preserve
Photo courtesy of the USGS.
Buto terrestris, a native toad thai looks similar to
the exotic, invasive cane toad. Photo courtesy of
the USGS.
Conservation Collier Program
31
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManaeenflJn!cFMnof 60
Feral domestic cat (Felis catus): undocumented within the Milano Preserve
Domestic cats originated from an ancestral wild species, the European and African wildcat (Felis
silvestris). Humans facilitated the global distribution of cats due to their highly efficient
predatory skills. Egyptians took cats with them on shipping vessels to keep rodent populations
down, and they likely introduced domestic cats to Europe. Subsequently the expansion of the
Roman Empire and European missionary missions facilitated the spread of domestic cats into
Asia and beyond (Masterson 2007). Today, the impact of feral cats on wildlife is difficult to
quantify; however, literature (FFWcc 2001; Karim 2007; Masterson 2007) strongly indicates
that they are a significant factor in the mortality of small mammals, birds (including migratory
birds), reptiles, and amphibians in Florida. Because free-ranging cats often receive food from
humans, they may reach abnormally high numbers. An increase in the population of feral cats
may lead to increased predation rates on native wildlife. While no cats have yet been observed
on the Milano Preserve, there exists a high probability of their future presence on the preserve
due to the proximity of Milano to human residential areas. Adjoining residents of the preserve
should be encouraged to keep their cats indoors and staff should monitor the preserve for the
presence of feral cats.
3.0 Previous and Current Use of the Preserve; Adjacent Land Uses
3.1 Previous Use of the Preserve and Adjoining Lands
Aerial photographs taken in 1973 (Figure 9) and 1996 (Figure] 0) accompanied by more recent
visits to the site show that development has never occurred on the site. Digital images were
downloaded from the Florida Department of Transportation's Aerial Photo Look Up System
(2008) and georeferenced in ArcMap 9.2 by Conservation Collier Staff.
Conservation Collier: Historical Aerial Image from 1973 ",tf~(,"....
of the Milano Preserve and Adjoinin Lands
[""~5o\",,'P,,,,",,-~C'''''''''''_~'''''_
F..,r. ,~n"'rlOl,~~o,~ ~.....,,-FD<:J1
,.-"" f"-.__n"c.:.--",._{;_,~ >\II....,
'~'{,""'""""""~""""'''''''''''-'''''''''''~
'",F_...""'..".."'PI,.r,'lI'lOC......_""","_"""'.""lPII
'-""""",,fl~
.........<'""'..............
[NJlOO2M(>(l)OO'a!;J.2(l(l(I2
Legend
~ Milano Preserve
r 1973 Roads
. Cocohatchee Canal
Figure 9: Historical Aerial Photograph from 1973 of the Milano Preserve and Adjoining Lands
Conservation Collier Program
32
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManarzenflJn!ffYMnof 60
Conservation Collier: Historical Aerial Image from 1996 ,,,Iit,,.-..
of the Milano Preserve and Ad aining Lands
u.,..........P..._.c_,"""'....p,"""",_....,
,..~_'__(_"'""b'~ '''...''m_'''XlT
c_'""O'.._M~~($M"A ""'""
',;:,...-__c.__o.\Acn,otO<l",_.IM."",,,_
f",'...,...._~_'~!l(i("""._..._""""""...
'1d_,7.100a
_F_"'....~..
OO,8G2MilO1OOI6GllODl);'
, legend
cl... Milano Preserve
'r 1996 Roath
. I. Cocohatchee Canal
Figure 10: Historical Aerial Photograph from 1996 of the Milano Preserve and Adjoining Lands
3.2 Current Land Uses
Currently, there is no sanctioned public use of the Milano Preserve. Conservation, restoration
and natural resource-based recreation are the designated uses of this preserve. Management
activities allowed include those necessary to preserve, restore, secure and maintain this
environmentally sensitive land for the benefit of present and future generations. Public use of
the site must be consistent with these management goals and will be discussed in section 4.4 of
this document.
The Olde Cypress Planned Unit Development (PUD) adjoins the Milano Preserve to the west,
north and east. This PUD contains residential, commercial and conservation lands; specifically,
a cypress slough under preservation is located to the northwest, north and northeast, the Fairway
Preserve Condominiums are to the east and commercial lands and a drainage tract for the PUD
are to the west of the Milano Preserve. Areas not contained within the PUD include a greenway
trail, the cocohatchee Canal and ]mmokalee Road (from north to south) to the south of the
preserve and Laurel Oaks Elementary School and Gulf Coast High School on the south side of
]mmokalee Road (Figure II).
The proposed Terafina, Parklands and Mirasol PUDs are located to the north and east of the Olde
Cypress PUD and the Milano Preserve. Existing and proposed preserves for these PUDs
contiguous with the Milano preserve are illustrated in Appendix 4.
COllservation ColUer Program
33
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflJn!ff'l&nof 60
Conservation Collier: Areas Adjacent to the Milano Preserve
t"ft':~,c",,,,"ty
Legend
.. Milano Preserve .. Dunkin Donuts
_ Olde Cypress Conservation Area Laurel Oak Elementary; Gulf Coast High
I\;>;,+:::'J Fairway Preserve Condominiums Cocohatchee Canal
_ Olde Cypress Tract D1 - Drainage --- Collier County Roads
Cypress Self Storage, LLC
Areas Adjacent to the Milano Preserve
o
,
~-' ~
250
500 Feet
,
M.lann FolIO nurnber&
0018628ooo3.001863:orJ02
Figure 11:
3.3 Cultural, Historical and Archeological Resource Protection
The Milano Preserve is not within an area of historical and archaeological probability, and no
historical or archaeological sites appear to be present on the property. The County will notify the
Division of Historical Resources immediately if evidence is found to suggest any archaeological
or historic resources are discovered. ]f such resources are identified on-site, staff shall cordon
off the area, and a professional survey and assessment shall be instituted. The archaeologist shall
prepare a report outlining results of the assessments and issue recommendations to County staff
about management of any sites discovered, per provisions of the Land Development Code
Section 2.2.25. This report shall be sent to the Division of Historical Resources. The County
shall cooperate fully with direction from the Division of Historical Resources on the protection
and management of archaeological and historical resources. The management of these resources
will comply with the provisions of Chapter 267, Florida Statutes, specifically Sections 267.06 I 2
(a) and (b).
Conservation Collier Program
34
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!ff1ilnaf 60
3.4 Major Accomplishments during Previous Years
Since the acquisition of the Milano Preserve in July 2006, major accomplishments have been
achieved (Table 9). Conservation Collier staff explored options of funding exotic removal
through grants from the Department of Environmental Protection before contracting this service
out. The invasive, exotic removal project was implemented throughout the site while staff
concurrently established photo-monitoring points to better aid in the long-term management of
the preserve. Subsequently, the Collier County Sheriffs work weekenders removed large
amounts of debris. Given the discrepancy between the ]995 and 2001 FLUCCS digital layers (as
they pertain to the Milano Preserve) and the removal of exotic vegetation since the acquisition of
the property in July 2006, staff created a new digital layer showing the location and extent of the
native plant communities currently found on the preserve.
Table 9: Major Accomplishments since the Acquisition
of the Milano Preserve
Accomplishment Year(s)
Established photo monitorinp noints 2008
Removed and treated the invasive, exotic plants soecies on the Preserve 2008
Sherriff Oept. weekenders removed larlle amounts of miscellaneous debris from site 2008
Created an accurate FLUCCS Man of the Preserve 2008
4.0 Future Use of the Milano Preserve including
Management Issues, Goals and Objectives
This section describes the main management issues, goals, and objectives for the Milano
Preserve as well as the overall management framework. Central to the management of the
Preserve is the mission of the Conservation Collier Program, and the goals and objectives set
forth in this management plan.
4.1 Management Plan Framework
Each property purchased by Conservation Collier shall have its own management plan. At the
time the Milano Preserve was purchased, the Conservation Collier Ordinance required that an
"]nterim" Management Plan be developed within 60 days of closing. Interim plans include basic
items such as removal of invasive exotics and trash, establishing site security, developing
management partnerships and planning for public access. The interim plan for this site was
officially approved in October 2006. The ordinance then requires a "Final" ten-year
management plan be developed within two years; the first draft of this management plan was
submitted to the Lands Evaluation and Management Subcommittee in October 2008. Once
approved, the property management plan must be reviewed every five years. Final management
plans, however, are considered living documents and can be updated at any time. Review of all
management plans start in the Lands Evaluation and Management subcommittee and must be
approved by both the CCLAAC and the Collier County Bee.
Conservation Collier Program
35
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!fP"l&nof 60
4.1.1 Preserve Manager: Contact Information
The site manager for Milano Preserve will be a designated Collier County Environmental
Specialist who may be contacted through electronic mail: ConservationCollier@Colliergov.net.
4.2 Planned Uses and Assessment oftheir Impacts
Future planned use will be consistent with the primary goals of conservation, preservation,
restoration and maintenance of the resource. Official public use of the site may not be possible
until safe public access trails can be created. However, citizens that desire to visit the site prior
to opening may do so by signing a waiver that will allow them access at their own risk and
releases the liability of the County until safe access is established. Details of planned uses for
the Milano Preserve and an assessment of their potential impacts are provided in the following
secti ons.
4.2.11dentijication of Public Uses Consistent with Preservation, Enhancement, Restoration,
Conservation and Maintenance of/he Resources
The Conservation Collier Ordinance 2002-63 constrains the use of this property to "primary
objectives of managing and preserving natural resource values and providing appropriate natural
resource-based recreational & educational opportunities." Natural resource-based
recreation shall mean all forms of uses, which are consistent with the goals of this program, and
are compatible with the specific parcel. Such uses may include, but are not limited to hiking,
nature photography, bird watching, kayaking, canoeing, swimming, hunting and fishing (Ord.
No. 02-63, as amended~ 5, ]2-3-02). Additionally, no dumping, use of unauthorized vehicles, or
removal or destruction of natural or historical/archaeological resources will be permitted within
the preserve. The goal is to allow limited, non-destructive public access to native plant
communities and animal species. Currently, the preserve rules are those identified in Collier
County Ordinance 76-48 (available from www.municode.com). as amended.
The following are consistent uses for this particular site: hiking, nature photography and bird
watching. Inconsistent uses include swimming, kayaking / canoeing, fishing, hunting and off
road vehicle use (OR V).
]n addition, there are no existing easements, concessions, or leases at the Milano Preserve. ]n
accordance with the management goals of the preserve, no future easements, concessions, or
leases are appropriate in association with this site, other than conservation related easements.
4.3 Desired Future Conditions
This section includes a description of the proposed future conditions for the site's natural areas.
Management techniques to achieve these conditions are outlined in section 4.4.
After managers complete recommended management actions, Milano Preserve will consist of
cypress-pine-cabbage palm, cypress and pine flatwoods; these communities will have a similar
structure and composition to those that existed before non-indigenous people settled the region
and before the exclusion of fire. With the exception of a boardwalk, the site will be vegetated
with appropriate native flora that will provide suitable cover for a variety of wildlife species.
Conservation Collier Program
36
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!f/'"Mhof 60
4.4 Goals for the 10 year period 2008-2018
A set of goals and objectives for Milano Preserve were developed in conjunction with the
drafting of this Management Plan. The goals and objectives in this plan are tailored specifically
for Milano Preserve based on the purposes for which the lands were acquired, the condition of
the resources present, and the management issues for the property. On-site managers should be
familiar with this entire Management Plan. Goals and objectives from the interim management
plan for the Milano Preserve were reviewed to determine whether they should be included in this
plan. The goals and objectives presented here reflect programmatic goals and ideas of
Conservation Collier personnel in charge of managing and protecting the area. These goals shall
not be modified, but specific application of management techniques may take into consideration
input by user groups and other stakeholders from outside the program, accommodating user
needs and desires where practicable and where overarching management goals are not violated.
Management issues are discussed below in separate sections. Within each section, approaches for
dealing with these issues are described. The ability to implement the specific goals and
objectives identified in this plan is dependent upon the availability of funding sources. The
following goals have been identified for Milano Preserve:
Goal 1: Eliminate or significantly reduce human impacts to indigenous flora and fauna
Goal 2: Develop a baseline monitoring report
Goal 3: Remove or control populations of invasive, exotic or problematic flora and fauna to
restore and maintain natural habitats
Goal 4: Determine jfprescribed fire and/or mechanical treatments are feasible to decrease
woody invasion resulting from past fire exclusion if so proceed
Goal 5: Restore native vegetation
Goal 6: Develop a plan for public use
Goal 7: Facilitate uses of the site for educational purposes
Goal 8: Provide a plan for security and disaster preparedness
GOAL 1: ELiMINATE OR SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE HUMAN IMPACTS TO INDIGENOUS
FLORA AND FA UNA
Action Item 1.1 Install a fence and access gate around the perimeter of the Milano
Preserve if needed.
Presently, staff does not recommend a fence around the property but if trespassing, chronic
dumping or other security issues arise, a field fence, four feet in height, will be installed along
the boundaries of the property where these issues occur. ]f this fence is installed, one or more
gate(s), 12 feet in width and four feet in height will be installed (if needed) along the fence-
line to allow access to the Milano Preserve by authorized County staff and the fire
department.
Conservation Collier Program
37
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManmzenflJn!<i'MInof 60
Action Item 1.2 Install signs encouraging people to stay on any future public access trails
situated on the preserve.
Action Item 1.3 Identify locations of rare and listed native plant species.
The location of these species will be identified using a global positioning system (GPS)
device and mapped to allow staff to monitor them. Public trails will be constructed to avoid
areas where rare and listed species exist.
Action Item 1.4 Enforce regulations prohibiting trash in or near the preserve.
Staff will monitor the trails on a regular basis and if excessive dumping or littering start to
occur, enforcement actions will be sought through the County Sheriffs Department.
Action Item 1.5 Identify actual and potential locations of resident animal life and take
steps such as locating visitor amenities away from animal nesting sites.
Action Item 1.6 Avoid non-target damage to native plants and animals, especially rare
species, during invasive, exotic plant treatments.
]f the use of herbicides is appropriate during the removal of invasive, exotic plant species,
decisions on the types of herbicides utilized will be made on the best information available at
the time of exotic removal. Staff has prohibited the use of herbicides containing Imazapyr
(e.g., Arsenal) due to reports that these herbicides have potentially caused a great deal of non-
target damage throughout the state. Licensed County or State contractors have been (and will
be) monitored closely to ensure the proper herbicide applications are being utilized while
treating the site. In addition, close attention will be paid to identify listed epiphytes (Table 7)
that may be attached to invasive trees being cut down or removed. Plants of these species will
be relocated prior to removal. Special attention will be given to avoid damage to native
species in the vicinity of exotic removal activities. Hand pulling of exotic seedlings will be
done when possible.
Action Item 1.7 Note and research all site development occurring adjacent to Milano
Preserve to determine that the proper site development permits have been obtained and
that the site development complies with the permits.
Activities on adjacent lands may have an impact on the indigenous plant and animal life on
the Milano Preserve. As such, all existing local, state, and federal regulations should be
strictly followed and enforced during any site development adjacent to the preserve. It shall
be the responsibility of the developer to establish erosion control measures and vegetation
protection measures (i.e., protective fencing or barriers). If any site developer working in
areas adjacent to the preserve does not take the necessary control measures, construction shall
be immediately halted until control measures are put into place and mitigation and/or
remediation will be the sole responsibility of the developer.
Conservation Collier Program
38
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflJn!f!'Mnof 60
GOAL 2: DEVELOP A BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
Action Item 2.1 Establish a long-term biological monitoring program and conduct
additional wildlife surveys.
Long-term management of the preserve should be based on biological data, Changes
following baseline conditions should be assessed as negative or positive, and management
strategies changed appropriately, This section discusses information needs and long-term
monitoring needs.
Conservation Collier staff has conducted a floristic inventory of the Milano Preserve; these
findings will comprise the baseline floristic data on which future actions will be based. The
site should be inspected by Conservation Collier Staff at least twice a year and thoroughly
inventoried at regular intervals (ca, 5-10 years) to detect new invasions (by natives or exotics)
and extinctions. Areas undergoing extreme restoration should be assessed more frequently.
While some wildlife data has been collected, additional baseline data should be collected,
especially on invertebrates, small mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. The site manager may
contract this work out or enlist the assistance of local educators to coordinate student research
projects. Wildlife sampling, like plant sampling, on non-listed species only, should take place
at regular intervals (ca. 5-10 years) to detect long-term trcnds.
Currently, six (6) photo points have been established throughout the preserve (Figure 11).
Locations of photo points have been recorded with a GPS and all photographs taken at these
locations have been taken at a standard height and angle of view, During photo
documentations, one photo is taken in each of the cardinal directions (north, east, south and
west) and a 360-degree panoramic photo is taken. These photos will help to monitor exotic
removal and native plant recruitment over time, If necessary, more photo points will be
established to aid in
Conservation Collier: Photo Monitoring Point Locations management decision
activities. Future photo
points will include photos
taken with a vegetation
profile board to aid in the
determination of what (if
any) changes occur over
time.
Q OOO'S cosu'"
,
,-,~". "~,-,~"'~-<.'- .~.... ~._. "",,-
'-H, '~___.__'.__.~..'_
-_.~. .,-,"-_._..~-,
'-"'-'~'^.~~""''''-''''''-'''''
.....,..,_N...,-.
"'~'''J1''''''''''''''
legend
CMllanoPres.""8
Collier Count)' Roads
CocohatcheeCanal
... PhotoPoints
".tI"",~,
Figure II: Photo Point
Locations within the
Milano Preserve
Conservation Collier Program
39
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflJn!fPo/anof 60
GOAL 3: REMOVE OR CONTROL POPULATIONS OF INVASIVE, EXOTIC OR
PROBLEMA TIC FLORA AND FA UNA TO RESTORE AND MAINTAIN NA TURAL HABITATS
Action Item 3.1 Acquire services of licensed and qualified contractor(s) for the removal
of invasive, exotic or problematic plant species.
The following (Table 10) describes recommended controls (Langeland & Stocker 200]) of the
Category I, invasive, exotic plant species recorded to date on the Milano Preserve. These
recommended control methods may be altered by site managers dependent on new
information and products available on the control of these species.
Table 10: Invasive, Exotic Plant Species Control Plan
for the Milano Preserve FLEPPC Catel!orv I snecies <<
Scientific Name Common Recommended Control(s)'
Name(s)
Acacia auriculiformis earleaf acacia Hand pull seedlings or hasal bark application of 10% Garlon 4 Of cut-
stumn treatment with 50% Garlon 3A.
Basal bark treatment with 10% Garlan 4 is very effective, as is a cut-
stump treatment with 50% Garlon 3A or 10% Garlan 4. \\Then basal
Casuarina sp. Australian pine bark treatment is used on trees greater than I foot in diameter it may
be necessary to slough off loose bark in the application area to prevent
the bark from trapping the herbicide. Broadcut or 4-6 Ib Velpar UL W
may he used when annronriate.
Hand pull seedlings or hasal bark application of 100% Pathfinder II,
or 10%-20% Garlon 4 diluted with oil; or cut stump application of
Cupaniopsis anacardioides carrotwood 10% Garlon 3A, 1 00% Brush~B~Gon, 100% Roundup Pro, 100%
Rodeo, or equivalent glyphosate containing product, or 100%
Pathfinder II.
For seedlings and saplings: (I) hand pull, being sure not to break plant
off of root system and remove or place in piles to help reduce the
chance that they will re~root or; (2) Treat with foliar, low volume spot
melaleuea, punk application of 5% Rodeo. For mature trees: (1) Fell large trees with
Melaleuca quinquenervia chain saw leaving a lcvel surface. or fell small trees with machete and
tree, paper bark treat with triclopyr or glyphosate products according to frill and girdle
directions on SLN. Use aquatic versions where standing water is
present. Monitor for resprouting and retreat as necessary. (3) Mature
trees are very difficult to control with foliar annlications.
Hand pull seedlings or cut-stump treatment with 50% Garlon 3A. 10%
Garlon 4 or a basal bark application of 10% Garlon 4. Foliar
application of Garlon 4, Garlon 3A, Roundup Pro, Roundup Super
Schinus terehinthifolius Brazilian pepper Concentrate, or Rodeo, according label directions may be used where
appropriate. Glyphosate products are less effective when used alone in
spring and early summer. Use Rodeo \vhere plants are growing in
aquatic sites.
.. FLEPPC 2007: Category I plants are those that alter native plant communities by displacing native species, change
community structures or ecological functions, or hybridize with natives.
b Langeland & Stocker 2001
Conservation Collier Program
40
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Presel1Je Land Mana"enflJn!fPo/anof 60
ACTION ITEM 3.2 Acquire services of licensed or qualified contractor(s) for the removal
of invasive, exotic or problematic animal species.
To date, two (2) introduced animal species have been documented on the Milano Preserve, the
RIF A and the brown anole. lt is doubtful that the total eradication of these species can be
achieved. However, staff and/or contractors should take measures to remove RIF A
populations close to or on public access trails.
If feral cat colonies are found near the preserve, the elements that sustain the undesirable
population(s) should be identified and efforts made to ask property owners to eliminate them
(i.e., refuse bins, dumpsters, and supplementary feeding by humans). ]f any feral cats remain,
they will be trapped and taken to Collier County Domestic Animal Services.
ACTION ITEM 3.2 Coordinate the control of invasive plant and animal populations with
the Olde Cypress PUD preserve management entity.
GOAL 4: UTILIZE PRESCRIBED FIRE AND/OR MECHANICAL TREATMENTS TO
DECREASE WOODY INVASION RESULTING FROM PAST FIRE EXCLUSION.
Action Item 4.1 Develop a prescribed fire or mechanical treatment plan to mimic
natural fires within the Preserve.
Much of Collier County is comprised of plants that are dependent on fire to maintain species
composition and diversity. These species are the same ones that are prone to lightning strike
wildfires, and the controlled reduction of those fuels will prevent catastrophic wildfire
damage. Prescribed fires: reduce fuel loads and consequently decrease the threat of wildfires;
create open areas for wildlife to travel within; stimulate food and seed production; recycle
nutrients; alter the composition and density of forested areas; and aid in the control of invasive
plant species.
The structure and composition of the mesic pine jlalwood community is dependent on
periodic fires. Fire probably occurred every I to 8 years during pre-Columbian times. A
majority of the flora and fauna found within this community are adapted to periodic fires;
several species depend on fire for their continued existence. Without relatively frequent fires,
mesic pine flatwoods succeed into hardwood-dominated forests whose closed canopy can
essentially eliminate herbaceous groundcover and shrubs. Additionally, the dense layer of
litter that accumulates on unburned sites can eliminate the reproduction of pine trees that
require a mineral soil substrate for proper germination (FFWCC 2002).
Fire is the ideal ecological tool for achieving a sustainable mesic pine flatwood community.
However, due to the proximity of the Milano Preserve to Immokalee Road, residential and
commercial areas and the size of the parcel, alternate manual or mechanical treatments will be
investigated in lieu of managing the lands through the use of fire.
Conservation Collier Program
41
Agenda Item No. 15E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflJn!cJ>Mnof 50
Action Item 4.2 If fire is deemed appropriate, delineate fire management and rescue
access routes, and provide this information to the police department and emergency
services.
If fire is deemed an appropriate management tool on the Milano Preserve, the fire plan and
access routes to and within the preserve will be provided to the police department and
emergency services.
GOAL 5: RESTORE NATIVE VEGETATION
Action Item 5.1 Maintain a revised GIS map and description of FNAI natural
communities and disturbed areas on the property.
Maintaining updated maps will help to guide restoration efforts
Action Item 5.2 Plant native plant species in their appropriate habitats
Periods following exotic removal and prescribed fire (or mechanical treatment) are essential to
the recruitment of native plants. If native plant recruitment is not sufficient from the
surrounding, intact seed source, efforts will be made to plant indigenous flora in appropriate
habitats. Natural area restoration of Milano Preserve should include only site-specific native
plant material that has been detennined to be non-problematic at the site and whenever
possible, site-specific seed sources should be utilized. ]n addition, hardwoods that may
invade the natural areas (mesic pine flatwood area) should not be planted.
GOAL 6: DEVELOP A PLAN FOR PUBLIC USE
Action Item 6.1 Develop access and required facilities for intended public uses
A parking lot will not be constructed on site due to the amount of wetlands present and the
lack of vehicular access. The green way trail just south of the property (north of the
Cocohatchee Canal and Immokalee Road) will serve as the path along which the public may
gain access to the southem portion of the preserve on foot or by bicycle. Conservation Collier
staff has developed a conceptual site plan (Figure 12) incorporating a raised boardwalk and a
seasonal trail. The planned trail system will be approximately I 170 linear feet (LF) long and
the materials used will be based on funding sources available. The following paragraphs
describe the components of the trail system and the ideal lengths (option one) of each section.
Option One
. The raised boardwalk measuring approximately 650 feet in length shall adhere to
guidelines and standards set forth by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
As permitting for the boardwalk goes forward, a review of ADA compliance should
be done by the County. The elevation of the boardwalk would allow for fluctuation
of water levels and the movement of small animals. The entrance of the boardwalk
would be located approximately 370 feet east of Preserve Lane. As depicted in the
conceptual site plan, the entrance of the boardwalk would house an interpretive
sign. This sign would provide general infonnation about Conservation Collier and
the characteristics of the Milano preserve. The southem portion of the walkway
would be installed along the transition zone between the cypress-pine-cabbage palm
Conservation Collier Program
42
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManazenflJn!<PMnof 60
and pine tlatwoods communities; this placement along the ecotone will theoretically
allow visitors the best opportunity to view the plants and animals of both
communities. An interpretive sign would be placed along this portion of the
boardwalk to give specific information about the plant communities and associated
animals that may be seen form this portion of the boardwalk. The walkway would
then continue northward through the cypress-pine-cabbage palm community and
end at a platform. The route of the boardwalk was approximated from a 2008 aerial
image to take advantage of areas where impacts to the community would be
minimized. An engineering firm would be contracted to plan the design of the
boardwalk and would be requested to do so in the least impactful way possible. The
consulting, planning and permitting would be very expensive as well as the costs to
build a boardwalk. This process will also be very time consuming. It is estimated
that at least a year will be needed to complete the planning and permitting process.
Grants will be applied for in the lag time to assist in the costs associated with this
option.
.
The optional seasonal walking trail measuring approximately 520 feet in length
would be installed dependent on the costs associated with the project and the status
of the budget after the construction of the boardwalk. This trail (closed to public
access during times of high water) would begin at the platform and allow visitors to
access the cypress area of the preserve. The route of the trail was approximated
from a 2008 aerial image to take advantage of areas where impacts to the plant
community would be minimized. The northern portion of this walking trail would
take advantage of an existing trail running northwest to southeast on the property.
As depicted in the conceptual site plan, a directional sign and trail markers will be
strategically placed to help visitors stay on this trail. Additionally, an interpretive
sign will be placed near the end of this trail.
.
Platform and associated components: As depicted in the conceptual site plan, the
platform would be located at the terminus of the boardwalk. The platform would be
ADA compliant and include a bench and interpretive sign. It would be accessible
from the south via the proposed boardwalk and would allow visitors access to the
seasonal walking trail via a gate and stairs. The gate would be locked during times
of high water.
Option Two
. ]f a boardwalk proves to be cost prohibitive (no grant funding available), a seasonal
walking trail only may be provided. The path of this trail would mimic the entire
trail system illustrated in Figure 12. Educational signage would be installed and
would be removed and replaced before and after each rainy season. As the name
suggests, this trail would only be open to the public during the dry season. This
trail would be closed by staff during the wet season.
Conservation Collier Prot,Trarn
43
"'0>0
wo<o
-o~
""0
",<0
L~"
-Q)
E'''' '"
Q) 0. <1l
==4:D..
<1l
'0
C
Q)
'"
4:
]
0..,
u;
7n
o
Q)~
i:~
Q) 'v;
III ~
Q),g
..~
a.,;;
O:g
=1-
C\'I ill
-'"
.-
:E
Q)
.c
...
..
o
...
t/l
'C co
III
0 <:>
Ill:: <:>
N
-" t/l
c: CIl
::I :;::
0 ';:
U ::I
... E
.!!! E
"0 0
u u
-
, c:
I .!!!
i
, c..
III
c:
CIl III
t= u
CIl CIl
t/l CIl
CIl .c
.. u
c.. -;
o .c
c: 0
jM
';:
~
'"
:;
~
"
e
'-l
"
?-
'"
~
0::
=
C\'I
-
a.
Q)
...
.-
m
-
C\'I
=
...
a.
Q)
u
=
o
U
"
.2
~
I-
u..
~
a
;2
N
.:
Q)
.-
-
-
o
U
=
o
.-
...
C\'I
~
Q)
III
=
o
U'
E
III
c..
CIl
Cl
.Q
.Q
III
U
. t/l CIl
CIl 'C c:
c: 0 c..
c.. 0
cncn!~
:g ~ ii: ~
.. ... Q) ...
g; g; c: g:
uuii:<I:
0111
>-"'0 IV.!!! ~
~5:5=:o
- - c
wc'O g 2t
(ij.2 en tV
Ui;j.c"'C"'O
III u "6>.!!- E 0)
o..QCCevc:
..... II) Ql _.-
oli- ID~-g
c'- III .... III ::J
IV.c: 0.,...._
~~I-~~
Itl 0) _-
III .';:Orne
..... Q) E ~ :::l
C;S ill_ TI
~ -~~
t:: ~ ~c d) ~
~olllg=:=
c.:~::~E~
Itl ~ <II 0'-
ES - J:: g!
I])"C '- (lI
~~:5 iii~
.~"C _~"'C
oC:oi;j>.Ql
= 2 ~ Itl=
..E.5 ~"'C E
lP "ii) Iii 0..
~~-8.&E5
en Ci
c: c:
.!2 .!2
... C'G_ :!
(I) r.. Q) ><
CIl I- CIl W
- - -
o ra 0 (1)
~ 10 C:N U
_ '" 0 II) c: t/l
ra en cae c
~t:~ ~~ ::.~ .2'
'ECO'scn.! ~ rn en
III c. III ..J III CIl-
OEE E :!!: > III
al ._<1:._ lll:;:: c:
o><z><;: CIl 0
-gUEoE 'C c..,c;;
cn<(a.i=c. ... ... (,,) CJ
.- c..Q.c.. ra cue!
~~:!O:! ~ C ~ c
~_ical.
I.
t~
"
li
H ;
;~ ,~
~.r~ ~~
€"h '.)
H:
Hi 8
'~n ~~
~H1;("",
1!~'" E ~
Id:1Eo
s:'~ 0 ~
~ p'5....,
=~ fl.l... 8
H~ ~~
~~lii~
".'1 0
~5 0
=
'"
6:
..
'"
-
'"
'"
~
-;
=
-
Q,
'"
(j
=
0
U E
'" '"
, ~
'"
'" 0:;
'"
.. ...
Il. ~
0
= -
..!! c3
~ .8
-
N '"
;.
..... ...
'" "
.. '"
= s::
ell 0
[i: U
44
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Mana"enflJn!<i'lanaf 60
GOAL 7: FACILITATE USES OF THE SITE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES
Actions Item 7.1 Develop interpretive signage to educate preserve visitors.
Once a trail system is complete, site specific signage will be developed to educate visitors on
plant identification and general ecosystem information. A large sign with a map of the
preserve will be installed at the boardwalk or trail entrance and smaller, more site specific
interpretive signs, will be placed along the boardwalk or seasonal trail.
Action Item 7.2 Provide preserve brochures in rainproof box on site.
A brochure outlining the native plant communities and wildlife present at the preserve will be
created by County staff and kept in rainproof boxes near the preserve entrance. The preserve
manager will inspect these boxes monthly and refill as necessary.
GOAL 8: PROVIDE A PLAN FOR SECURITY AND DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
Action Item 8.1 Discourage any visitation to the park at night.
A sign designating park hours as 8:00 am to dusk will be installed at the entrance to the
preserve and adjacent landowners will be given an emergency phone number if they detect
human activity on the preserve after hours. If problems arise, the Collier County Sheriffs
Office will be contacted to patrol the area and site on a routine basis.
Action Item 8.2 Enforce regulations prohibiting trash and landscape debris dumping in
or near the preserve.
Currently, there is no vehicular access and dumping is not a problem. Monthly inspections
will determine if dumping becomes a problem. Staff will work with the Collier County
Sheriff's Office to address dumping if it becomes a problem.
Action Item 8.3 Survey trees along the trail and the perimeter of the property annually
for damage
Staff will utilize the services of a certified arborist to determine diseased, weak, or damaged
trees/limbs surrounding the trails and kiosks that should be removed for safety reasons and
prior to hurricane season. This activity is intended to reduce the risk of visitor injury.
Action Item 8.4 Visit preserve within 48 hours after a storm event to assess damage.
Staff will take photos of damage and fill out appropriate Collier County Risk Management
Department forms. If damage is extensive, the preserve will be closed until public safety
hazards are cleared.
Conservation Collier Program
45
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manaf!enflJn!if'M'nof 60
Action Item 8.5 Promptly clear storm debris from preserve.
]f necessary, a Collier County emergency debris removal contractor will be contracted as soon
as possible after the storm to schedule clean-up. Removal of debris and damaged or downed
trees along the trail system may be needed. Downed trees and limbs that do not appear to be a
public safety hazard will be cleared at the discretion of the Preserve Manager. As much
hurricane debris as possible will be chipped and retained on-site ~ to be used as mulch for the
trail.
4.5 Establish an Operational Plan for the Milano Preserve
This section provides management recommendations for operation of the Milano Preserve. It
discusses maintenance and budgeting needs, the possibilities for contracting the restoration
activities, coordination, and other management issues.
4.5.1 Maintenance
The primary maintenance activities for the preserve will include control of dumping and littering
within and around the preserve and trail. Particularly important are the security measures to keep
intruders out and the signage and fencing (if installed) in good conditions. Signs that effectively
convey the desired message provide an opportunity for increasing environmental education and
awareness.
4.5.2 Estimated Annual Costs and Funding Sources
Preliminary budget estimates for Milano Preserve include cost breakdowns associated with
resource restoration and management. The funding source identified for the restoration and
management activities is the Conservation Collier Program Management Trust Fund. Grants
will be sought to supplement existing management funds and specifically for the costs associated
with the potential construction of the boardwalk. Staff will also utilize the Collier County
Sheriffs Department weekenders program for certain labor projects and may also separately
involve the County Scout programs for trail creation and enhancement.
The budget in table I 1 represents the actual and unmet budgetary needs for managing the lands
and resources of the preserve for the next ten years. The table shows the activities planned and
the initial and annual cost estimate of each activity. This budget was developed using data from
Conservation Collier and other cooperating entities, and is based on actual costs for land
management activities, equipment purchase and maintenance, and for development of fixed
capital facilities. The budget considers available funding and is consistent with the direction
necessary to achieve the goals and objectives for Milano Preserve.
Conservation Collier Program
46
cocno
wo<o
<oo~
~NO
o--i.Q)
Z~7
-Ql
E"C Ol
Ql 0. '"
=<to..
'"
"Q
C
Ql
OJ
-<
"
N
i';
0:::
-
~
'"
;;;
~
;;;
i';
o...l
'"
'"
~
'"
'"
c'::
;2
j
~
H
e..
<t
0::
a
-
..
OJ)
"C
=
Q:l
~~ ~Q Q ~ Q Q Q Q Q .,; :;: Q Q Q Q ~~
~~ Q ~ ., ., ~ ., ~ ~ Q ~ Q
-; q N :2 ~ N ~ "! :5 ~ ., ~
,,0 ~ N Q .. or.
c: ~ ~;1; ;:;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ or. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1"':;;:
Eo- ~
00 ~~ ;,; ., ., ~i
~ Q
"" ~ ~
, ~
r- ;:;
::
'"
~ Q ., Q Q
" r- ~ ~ c ~
.. "" ~ ~
" '"' - - - N
0- - ~
- 0
~
" '"
" C C C Q
" '"' ~ ~ C ~
" "" ~ - ~
~ .;. - - N
" - ~
" 0
~ '"
~~ ~ 52 c Q , Q
~ on ~ c ~~
" <5 ~ ~
- ..;. - N - -
~ - - ::;;~
" 0
"
~ '"
..:: ... ;,; ., C Q
~ ~ C ~
"" ~ ~
" ,J, - - - N
.: - -
C- o
5 '"
" ~ ., c c ~
~ '" c ~ ~ ~ c ~
~ '" ~ ~. ~ - ~
" N - "" - - '"
" - - - ~
" 0
~ '"
'" ~~ c c c c ~~
.: '" c ~ ~ ;;:
- "" ~
~ , - - - -
- ~
:; 0
" '"
5 , c c c c S; c c ' Q
~ W~ c c ~ ~ ~ ~~
'" ~. ~ "! "" ~
- 0 :2 - - N - - -
" - - - ~
.. 0 ~ "'::<
." '" -
"
'" c ~ c ' Q
- 0 p;~ 'n c i7,~
" "" c ~'"
" , c ;:; N ~~
5 ao c -
0 ~
" 0 -
.. '"
"
" ao c .,
" c .,
:< 0 ~ ~
, '" ..;
00 ~ ~
." 0 ~ -
" 0
" '"
...l , c ' c c ~ c c c c .,; -
-; ~ ~~ p c ~ c ~ <5 ~ ~ c N
'" N ~ - ~ rj .c .c c ~
" ~ ";l; - "" ~ N - - - 0 - N -
" - ~ - ~ ~ - -" ~
" ~ ~
" -
~ U
."
"
" :: '" "
~ ;>- c r= e- U 1!' ~
~, -' " "E u .,;
~ Eo- ~ ~:: - c c - v "
"" ~ ~ ~ - 'c 0 ~ .c ~ ~
0- e- N ~ ~ ~
.. - - '"
- -' ~ -
- C
"
:::; " r. E , ., '" < " v ~ ., . . 8 ~ " ..
., 51] ~ u
" ~ " v ,';j i::' ~ :E "V; :;; " 'S .g .9 ., c Q
Eo- , " ." '" ~ . 2
'2 0 0 f-
~ 0 v ~ .<f:: " ~ ~ 0 ~ c ~ "
~ f-- ~ [j c , -' ~
1j ~ c- u " u .~ Q u . U c
" 0 > 0:: '" 'C u . ~ ." 0 "
~ c E , ~ .~ . u oS 0. > u c ;;; ii' -
or: WJ u 00 c '" " w: 0
e ,~ is. '" " 'S c ;;
.~ ." is ~ ~ ~ u U
" ~ a .- " Q u
- " ~. :;J E :E 0:: 0 ~
.. ~
. - c ~ u U ';:j
Q ~ w: " .~ .f ;:::::: '" 0
., ~ .. WJ - e-
~ ~ J:i ~ " . "
5 z 'E t;
c
~ u ~ c
~ e- O;! O;! u
0
~
fJ
~
c'::
'-
~
-
a
lJ
.2
'5
r
'"
"
"
V
-
=
..
S
..
OJ)
..
=
..
~
"'S!
~
..
...l
-;
=
=
=
<
"C
..
-
..
.5
-
'"
~
-
-
..
-
.Q
..
,...
47
"''''0
-wg~
""0
-:i~
z:=Q)
E';:: OJ
Q) 0. m
",<(0-
m
'0
c
Q)
OJ
<( :::
-'l
Cl.,
-
~
i;;
E:
"
"
~
"
e
o...l
"
,.
'-
"
'"
~
ci:;
g
-'l
~
I-
~
a
~
c
N
.~
'"
-
'"
o
t)
"
"
-
'"
.S
-
'"
"
""'
o
"
on
<::
l'!
'"
:.a
I-
C')
on
"l
'0 ~
~s:
2::8
~]
co. _
C') '"
r-- <::
tiA .9
E C;j
o <::
~~
" 0.,
onX
<:: "
'" "
... "
co[/]
'"
"
-
"
.5
-
'"
'"
o C
'" 0:;
o -
- '"
~ ~
o 'ca
'" ...
~ -
<:: "
O..c
<1;:-
-
11) U
;. ::l
... ...
" -
'" ~
~ (5
0.. "
o .8
~~
"
~ ~
" '"
-=-a
-- 'C
... "
r.8ca
'" 8
tl "
85
"
"
-
'"
8
''::
'"
"
-
'"
<=
u
..
..:::
'"
~
.~
-
""
e
=
'"
'"
<
<::
o
b
;;
8
ca 'C
o 0.,
_ -0
" "
..c i(j
1-..0
"
"
8
"
"
"
::::
~
~
g
"
o
o
o
o
o
",.
""
'iil
"
-
'"
on
'"
"
-
"
1.:1
C
-
=
'"
..;
;.,
v"
'iil..o
8
.;( .~
o
Ci."E
0.,,,,
'" ::l
" '"
..0,,"
.;::
.~ ~
N'8
"
~5
"-0
blJe
.- '"
eblJ
8 8
,,-
1;;w:
~....l
~
.~ a;
.l::l ,11)
-
" ...
" '"
~ .5 5
0..0"0
1U r:--... ~
..c '"
I- ..0
M
o(l
,...,
~
;.,
...
'"
'"
'"
"
"
"
<::
~
....l
o
C')
'"
-
...
<8
o
<8
'"
o
o
o
on
""
'iil
~
'0
x
;".
~
'"
<::
.~
'"
"
.:-:
-
'"
-
~
e-
"
.5
on
""
'iil
"
"
'iil
.5
-
'"
,,~
u C
" '"
e '"
" '"
w.., 1$
-0 "
" e
i.i:a:l
0; 8
" "
= "
,,~
~v
~ .n
C')
'"
=
."
.;;;
"
.:-:
-
"
..
""
..
~..c
.5 ~
"
-0
"
'iil
:h! .S
':;::-
'"
.8 "
~
"'0
g x
"'00
...~
-= c
" blJ
blJ'-
e '"
.- "
'iil 8
u 0
.- u
-0_
e "
.- ~
e
blJ-
'Cij '"0
-0 <::
'" '"
o~
.....c
u
'"
.. "
"0
"'on
"",
So""
.- '-' 0
'" "0
c' o.
-"",
= ~ tA
~ a. ~
~
]
..:::( :.....~
~ 0.-
~ 0 -g 5iJ
""0 -- - 'm
~"'g ~~
]"'C.~ ""0
c ... ~
~ 5 E Cd
(/) l..o ro 00
.- '-' 1= ....
e: 0 -.=
V)"O:;
~'N ~ ca
.~ 0'3-
_00 0"'0-.
o.~ 11) "
EtiA'-gf
o II (J)._
u " 1:0
.." w.., -0 .-
......... -J ;:) ::::
o--ucg
~ ;;2 .5 ~ 00.
elf) C) ~
ro.J;;A. u ~ 0
4... ~ .~ s: ~
~~'2~~
~o:::J (/} u
~:2 ro 0
r.,";::::--
ro (l.) g ~-g
0,)...0 0 8 ~
-0 -0 on. .S- 8
.~ ;3 00 ::l'~
r:~t"'"'lo-rn
r-';>~ 1) Ij)
"
:0
..s
';3
;.
'"
'"
"
u
...
::l
o
'"
blJ
e
-0
~
..2
o
o
"1'
""
'iil
-0
"
'iil
.S
-
'"
"
=
"
u
'C! "
0; g ...-
'" e
V) c: "
r- Q) 0 ;>
r-:E~11)
~'ca; ~
_ E _ 0
o .,,0
U ~ N c:
.50'"00
c.- =
00.. '"
UC:O\O
o ro 0 N
--:'=0
"'0 eN 8
'C;; t:i l..o 2
c... ::3 t8 w....
o<r:::~O,)
04-<=(.)
o 0 C) ro =
~"-a ~ 0.. .~
V76'-~l-< -=
;,; 8 15...s ~ ..
~~~::2 -=
r~ 5 : ;: 8. ~
::: SEA ~ B ==
=~~ >,ro ~
"'; ro _ '- 0. i=:
;... 0.::::: 2t~ ~
:=..011) ~ {J'} ro .::
= VJ c....... .......
~ _ Vi 11) - =
p::'- 0 ;"S: Z
c:IC5 $ U 11);.> =\
.c
'"
"
..
-
o
o
'C!
""
'iil
-0
"
'iil
.s
-
'"
"
.c
"
=
"
=:I
,..:
~ ~ ~
o .- C)""d
~~~~]
" u c:_"O "
.D .5 ;> 0)
:::9M~..c~
g] ~ g>~
~::= '" 0.;::
- 0.,..0 1:: "
.;; 0) t.IJ ..........c:
l::""ONO)CI)
.- M""O 0)
Q ~ "'..c
cd :=.......
c~"'2~4-<
~~~.o~
~ t.IJ ;> C V}
V} _ 0 ro ::I
'-".- U U
""0 ~ 0) ~ ~
0) ....... .0 .......
...c: cd .ca..c
Ul-,.8l-CO
"3~......r-::I
" ". 0
s::;"'O~O l-
cd20;t.IJ-:S
~ :tI l- \0 l-
0"'5 ro fA 0
-:S B ~ 11 '5
bJ) cd [/'J CD 0
t:: U 0 cd U
0; '-0..0 V}
..- U '-0 $..; >...
~"'5No;O
".",. II 0.,..0 U;
~..o:::: 0 $..;" 0.
~ 0 0 ::I
~ r.i .~ N ~ e
f--...J-BfA_ CD
48
'" "
-B.=~~.s~
II ~~ == =-::
>...~~=e~t
""d.... ~ 0
a;:~s~~
- OJ) ~ ~ -
-~ ~ =.: >. =
~~ 0 ~ 0
.n~'O:g:::e"
~]-SS2~~
= 0:; ~rS~
M'..o ~ 0 ~ ~
V7""O;;;;:==~
+ ~ ~ =.5 ~ ~
__'ca ;S "C ~ ~ = .5
~~~==~o..c
QO ...c: .~ ~ " ~ ~
~ ~ .a .i ;g "C ~ 3
+G:'~~==gf;:
= ...J U ~ .~.~ ~ t.
= '-" '"3 .: ~ = ~ =
=:"..c~~~"C-;0J)
=t:::',,-.. ...-_ =
- ::::-' ," - ,"
N l- ;=:!.;: =.2 -'6iJ
~~~.c~~_5=
__ 4-< = ~.-
-~O_~~.c"
.......~..rI.l_.....Q
II ~ J: "Z ~ ~ ~
:< '-" = == 0.= "C
o;-=~~e.:=
l-....... _ ~ ~
(],)b.O~':"C--
..cC..:::=_=1if:I
~ ~ =-.. :; 5 .5
-d
~
...,
"
..c
-
blJ
.8
'"
"
-0
"
'iil
8
'';:
'"
"
"
..0
;.,
'"
8
S
"
-
'"
;.,
'"
'a
...
-
"
~
':;::
4.... Cd
0:;
tl E
o ...
uoS
c; b.O
" c:
g .~
"..8
~~
o
o
o
'"
""
,
'"
"
<2
"
'"
~
0:;
"
""'
o
c:
.S:
U
"
"
"
...
c:
'"
U:2
" -
iil'13
"€-e
"'0
blJ'C!
a'3~
-g ~
u"
.:: <'
o
Q,iN
"r--
=""
;! x
Ol 0
- ...
= 0.,
.; g.
~ 1$
~ a
.. c:
" "
~ .5
1.:1 E
,...,
,...,
;,;
'0
"
<=
-
" '"
.E ;;
"
" ;.,
~V)
'0 ;.,
" ...
P:: ~
= "
,...,
...
"
0.,
o
o
""
i..,.
'"
"
;.,
"E
:.a
-
"
"
;.
"
;;
"
;.,
... '"
" ...
o.,~
0;"
o ...
C') "
""..c
~ "0
,,-
;~
.c ...
"<8
<= ...
.. '"
=:I "
M ;.,
,...,
E:
"
~
~
'-
~
8
.8
~
"
03
c;
U
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2'" DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manarzement Plan Page 51 of 60
4.5.3 Potential for Contracting Restoration and Management Activities by Private Vendors
A significant number of Milano Preserve management operations and restoration activities can
be considered for outsourcing. Restoration and management activities that can be considered for
outsourcing to private entities are listed in table 12.
Table 12: Potential Contractin!! for Restoration and Mana!!ement Activities
Activitv Approved Conditional Reiected
Prescribed fire and! or mechanical treatment aoolication X
Minor fireline installation X
Firelinc. fence. and trail maintenance X
Fence installation X
Plant and wildlife inventof\' and monitoring X
Listed snecies mappin12 and needs assessment X
Restore/enhance encroachment and ruderal areas X
Reduce exotic snecies X
Literature develonmcnt and nrintim! X
Internretive signs development and installation X
Trail and boardwalk installation X
La\',' enforcement and oatrol X
Conservation Collier Program
49
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manarzement Plan Page 52 of 60
5.0 Literature Cited
Abrahamson, W. G., and D. C Hartnett. 1990. Pine flatwoods and dry prairies. Pages 103-149 in R. L.
Myers and J. J. Ewel editors. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press; Orlando,
Florida.
Brandt, L. A. and F. J. Mazziotti. 2005. Marine toads (Bufo marinus). University of Florida Cooperative
Extension Service Document WECII. 4pp. University of Florida, UF/IF AS Extension Digital
Information Source (EDlS) Database. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/UW/UW04600.pdf( accessed November 2007).
Campbell K. M. 1990. Soil survey of Collier County area Florida. USDA, Natural Resources
Conservation Service; Washington, D.C.
Campbell, T. 2001. The brown anole. Institute for Biological Invaders: Invader of the Month.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. Available from
http://invasions.bio.utk.edu/invaders/sagrei.html (accessed November 2007).
Campbell, T. S. 1996. Northern range expansion of the brown anole, Anolis sagrei, in Florida and
Georgia. Herp. Review 27:155-157.
Campbell, T. S. 2000. Analyses of the effects of an exotic lizard (Anolis sagrei) on a native lizard (Anolis
carolinensis) in Florida, using islands as experimental units. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Churchill, M. 2003. Giant marine toad (Bufo marinus) - Introduced Species Summary Project.
Columbia University, New York, NY. Available from http://www.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/danoff-
burg/invasion_bio/inv_spp_summ/Bufo_marinus.html (accessed December 2007).
Coates, S. F., M. B. Main, J. J. Mullahey, J. M. Schaefer, G. W. Tanner, M. E. Sunquist, and M. D.
Fanning. 1998. The coyote (Canis latrans): Florida's newest predator. University of Florida
Cooperative Extension Service Document WECI24. 5pp. University of Florida, UF/IFAS Extension
Digital Information Source (EDlS) Database. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/UW/UWI2700.pdf (accessed November 2007).
Collins, L. and R. H. Scheffrahn. 2005. Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Insecta:
Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). 9pp. Featured Creatures from the Entomology and
Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service Document EENY -195. Institute of
Food and Agricuttural Sciences, University of Florida. Available from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IN352
Fairbank, P. and S. Hohner. 1995. Mapping recharge (infiltration and leakage) throughout the South
Florida Water Management District. Technical publication 95-20 (DRE # 327). SFWMD, West
Palm Beach, Florida.
Florida Department of Transportation. 2008. Aerial Photo Look Up System Available from
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/surveyingandmapping/apac.shtm (accessed October 2008).
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). 2001. Impacts of feral and free-ranging
domestic cats on wildlife in Florida. Tallahassee, FL. A vailable from
http://www . fl oridaconservation.org/vi ewi ng/arti cl es/cat. pdf (accessed October 2007)
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). 2002. A conceptual management plan for
Caravelle Ranch Wildlife Management Area: 2002 - 2007. Tallahassee, FL. 2]8 pp. Available from
http://myfwc.com/wma-
planning/CMP/Caravelle%20Ranch%20WMAlCaravelle%20Ranch%20CMP%202002-2007 .pdf
(accessed December 2007)
Conservation Collier Program
50
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
20' DRAFT Milano Preserve Land ManaiZement Pian Page 53 of 60
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC). 2003, January 6. Florida's breeding bird
atlas: A collaborative study of Florida's birdlife. http://www.myfwc.com/bba/ (accessed July 2008).
Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). 2008. Acres of conservation lands by county. Florida State
University, Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee. FL. Available from
http://www.fnai.orglpdf/MA_acres_counties.pdf (accessed August 2008).
Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) and Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR) ] 990.
Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Florida
Department of Natural Resources.
Gilbert, T. 2005. South Florida Vegetation Classification Scheme Crosswalks. Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission, Office of Environmental Services. A vailable from
http://crocdoc.ifas. ufl.edulcrosswalklindex. php?cw=ffwcclandcover (accessed June 2008).
Humphrey, S.R. and P.G.R. Jodice. 1992. Big Cypress fox squirrel. Pp. 224-233. In S.R. Humphrey (ed.),
Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Mammals. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Johnson, S. 2007. The Cuban treefrog (Ostcopiius septentriona/is) in Florida Department of Wildlife
Ecology and Conservation Publication WEC2] 8. 8pp. Florida Cooperative Extension Service,
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (lFAS), University of Florida. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW259 (accessed December 2007)
Karim, A. 2007. Status and use of tropical hardwood hammocks and forested residential areas as habitat
for resident and Neotropical migratory birds in the Florida Keys. Master of Science Thesis.
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 61 pp.
Langeland, K. A., and R. K. Stocker. 200]. Control of non-native plants in natural areas of Florida.
University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service Document SP 242. 34pp. University of Florida,
UF/IFAS Extension Digital Information Source (ED IS) Database. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/WG/WG20900.pdf (accessed December 2007).
Larson, B. c., J. H. Frank, G. M. Allen, M. B. Main. 2006. Florida's native bromeliads. University of
Florida Cooperative Extension Service Circular ]466. 10pp. University of Florida, UFIIFAS
Extension Digital Infonnation Source (EDIS) Database. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW205 (accessed November 2007).
Lee, J. C. 1985. Ano/is sagrei in Florida: Phenetics of a colonizing species l. Meristic characters. Copeia
1985:]82-194.
Lodge, T. E. 2005. The Everglades handbook - Understanding the Ecosystem. 2nd edition. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL.
Liudahl, K., DJ. Belz, L. Carey, R. W. Drew, S. Fisher, and R. Pate. 1990. Soil survey of Collier County
area Florida. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service; Washington, D.C.
Masterson, J. 2007. Felis catus. Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort Pierce. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Available from http://www.sms.si.edulIRLspec/Felis_catus.htm (accessed November 2007).
Mazziotti, F. J. 2002. Wood Storks (Mycteria americana). Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service document SSWIS]2. 2pp. University of
Florida, UF/IFAS Extension Digital Information Source (EDIS) Database. Available from
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edulUW065 (accessed November 2007).
Miller J. A. 1986. Hydrogeologic Framework of the Floridan Aquifer System in Florida and in parts of
Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-
B. United States Govemment Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Nelson, G. 2000. The ferns of Florida: a reference and field guide. Pineapple Press, Sarasota, FL.
COllservaf;on Collier Program
51
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2" DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazement Plan Page 54 of 60
Oaks, R. Q. and J. R. Dunbar. 1974. Post Miocene Stratigraphy of the Central and Southem Atlantic
Coastal Plain. Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah.
Schwartz, A. and R. W. Henderson. 1991. Amphibians and reptiles of the West Indies: descriptions,
distributions, and natural history. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.
Scott, T. M. 1988. Lithostratigraphy of the Hawthorne Group (Miocene). Florida Geological Survey
Bulletin No. 59, Tallahassee, Florida.
Stimac 1. L., and S. B. Alves. 1994. Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control A Florida
Perspective. (Rosen D, Bennett FD, Capinera JL, Ed.) pp. 353-380. Intercept Limited, Andover,
Hants SPIO] YG, UK.
Sullivan, J. 1994. Cypress savanna. In: Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available
from: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (accessed July 2008)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Flowing water swamps. South Florida multi-
species recovery plan - a species plan.. .an ecosystem approach. USFWS Southeast Region,
Compact Disk.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Hydric pine flatwoods. South Florida multi-
species recovery plan - a species plan.. .an ecosystem approach. USFWS Southeast Region,
Compact Disk.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Mesic pine flatwoods. South Florida multi-
species recovery plan - a species plan.. .an ecosystem approach. USFWS Southeast Region,
Compact Disk.
Willcox, E. and W. M. Giuliano. 2006. Red Imported Fire Ants and Their Impacts on Wildlife.
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Publication WEe 207. Florida Cooperative
Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IF AS), University of Florida .
Available http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW242
Wunderlin, R. P., and B. F. Hansen. 2008. Atlas of Florida vascular plants. [S.M. Landry and K.N.
Campbell (application development), Floirda Center for Community Design and Research]. Institute
for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida, Tampa. Available from
http.l/www.plantatlas.usf.edu/.
Conservation Collier Program
52
>.
.
0
~ .g -< ~
~
~ ~ ~ .g '8 i3 '0
" ~ ~ ~ 0 !i
i 0 " ~ ~ 0 .
1 . " ~ ~ . . :a ~ ~
~ .. ~ ~ . G: 0 ~
.. 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 G: G: 0 "
" ~ ~ ~ >.
. " ~ " 0 e: 0 ~ ~ " " u ~ G: '"
:( e: " . ~
~ .. 0. '^ " 5 0 . b ;:: ~ '"
z G: . '8 ~ ~ '" " 0: '" ~
~ . '" . ~ ~ u
; ~ '" u
G: 1: 0:
" "
'" ~ " ~
0
0
" ~
E 0'
.g . "
'" 0 0 ~
U
~ 0 u 0
" '" ] ~ c .g 8
'" . . u
'" . ~ ~ :a G: " " ~ ~
~ '" " . 0 . ;0
< ~ ~ " 0 c 0
. ~ u . u '" ~ 0: " 0 u
': " .~ ~ ~ 5 0 . U ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ k
~ ;;0 ~ c ~ ~ u ~
0 '"
. ~ "
" '" 0 c :2
... G: ~
0 ~ .r;
0 " I
:<l ~ '"
;; '"
is . .
"E oS . ~
0 :g, ~ 0 ;;
U 0 G: 5
1..: ~ ~ N :;p
. ~
'U; . ~ "
~ t ~ . ~ '"
'" ~ ~ ~ .
< ~
u ~ ~ " OJ 0: ~
0 OJ , 1
v Q. '"
;:- . :l <.
'2 .~ ~ " Z ]
'c s. 0
::l 0 ;;..-, ~ 2
" c u 0 ~
E c ~ ~ 0
Q ;;: N ~ ~
0 W ~ 0 ~
U ;; - ~ ,;; ,= :;:
0 u ~
'E . 0 0
s: 0 ~
'" ] > ~'
0: " ~ , :s I
..: !5" u
u ~ '0 "- 0
?" . ~ 0 , 0 0 ;; E
'" ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 5 .
is .. 5 '" u >-, Q
~ . ~ .
'E ~ 0 0 'jj .
U . 0: a 0 0
" e ~ ~ u 0: '" 0 ]
,. 0 'jj " . .. ~ .
" '" u u ~ 0:
~ W ". '^
..::l 0 a e; . " '^ ~ , oj
" < '8 ~ ~ . . v
~ ~ ~ u OJ ~ iJ u
'" -< , ~ .. 0 0 0 co
" ~ " <- ~ 0: 0: 0 " I ~
~ 0 -' . '0 0:
<t '" ~ 0 ~ " 5 ~. ~ 8
0 ~ 0 ~ 8
.~ ~ ~ '3 11
<i ~ S. ~ > a
~ . . u' ~ ~
::l 0 ~ ~ 0
:;; ~ :< 0
;z: ~ .
. ~
'" Ci ~ '0 0 > ~
~ N n. ~
"0 0 ~ ~ - iJ
.;: 0 n .
0 ." - ~ "
G: .:! 1i 0
:; 0: u
~ "
0 " ]
Of> ;.. ~ 'ii
-'" ~ "
. ~ 0 ~ ] , u
<i ~ " :'S
~ 0 .
~ '0 0 :< ~ " ~ ~
0 '" . 0: ~ 0
~ .. " '" .
~ i.: u ~ ~ s. "
I:: i: '" .
~ ~ c . ~
;; '" 0 ~
u ~ " "
0 " ~
'"
~ ~ ! ~
OJ '"
.:= -
u .
[/) ~ ~
~
c ] . " . =: u
.~ ~ " Q. . ~ ~ 2
" -,;; s. " 0 ~
:; !i ~ Q. ii . . " ,
v '" E ~' " ~ " ~
~ 0 .. ~ ~ u
Of) ~ ~ P- u " 0:
0 " ~ . Q. .,
" '" < ~ s. u C " ~ -,2
> ~ ;;.-, S. U OJ .
U
;.. >. '" ~
- '" U
'" , ~
;; 0:
u " ~ ~ > > ~,
= ~ U ~ ~
u ~ OJ ~ > >
" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
c. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
<"
(')"'0
WO<o
COf?Jo
~ -l.()
OV'"
Z:= Q)
E'~~
~c::(o...
'"
'0
C
OJ
0)
<(
~
-
~
"
"
~
'"
i'i
'-1
"
'"
"
:;J
0::
'"
~
i
I-
"-<
~
o
"
N
.
"
~
"
Z
.
~
"
0:
~
"
!5"
]
u
~
c3
~
5
"
OJ
"
~
~
..
~
/:
u
~
5
~
.
~
"
"
So
Q
ct
"-
~
-
Q
v
.2
(;
'"
;;
~
G
0;", ,g
~,g ;::
~ ~ 8
u "
C == Cd
~ l5 0.
o
. u
~ ! j-~..
" u !:!
.) ~ ~ U
~ ~
53
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
20' DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazernent Plan Page 56 of 60
Appendix 2. Preliminary Floristic Inventory of the Milano Preserve.
Milano Preserve: Preliminarv Plant List
Flora recorded by: Christal Segura, Annisa Karim, Dr. George Wilder
Scientific Name Common Name(s) Stateh FLEPPC'
Acacia auriclll(formis a Earleaf acacia I
A eer rubrum Red mapte
Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common ragweed
Amvhicarvum muhlenberrdanum Blue maidencane
Androvozon zlomeratus Bushv bluestem
Annona zlabra Pond apple
Aristida stricto var. beyrichiana Wiregrass
Baccharis halimifolia Saltbush, Groundsel tree, Sea-mvrtle
Bidens alba Beggarticks, Romerillo
Blechnum serru/atum Swamp fem, Toothed midsoms fern
Boehmeria cvlindrica False nettle, Bo" hemo
Cassvtha (iliformis Lovevine, Devil's gut
Casuarina sp. , Australian pine I
Centella asiatica Spadeleaf
Cevhalanthus occidentalis Common button bush
Chrvsobalanus icaeD Coco plum
Cladium ;amaicense Saw grass, Jamaica swamp sawgrass
Coreopsis leavenworthii Leavenworth's tickseed
C OJ'nus {oem ina Swamp dogwood, Stiff dogwood
Cupaniopsis anacardioides , Carrotwood I
Cypel'lIs haspan Haspan flatsedge
Cvperus liRularis Swamp flatsedge
DiosDvros virf!iniana Common oersimmon
Emiliafosbergii' Florida tassleflower
Encyclia tampensis Butterflvorchid
Euvalorium cavillifolium Doo-fennel
Eustachys petraea Common fingergrass, Pinewoods fingergrass
Ficus aurea Strangler fig, Golden fig
Fuirena scirvoidea Southern umbrella sedge
Fraxinus caroliniana Carolina ash. Water ash, POD ash
F uirena spp. Umbrella sedge
Gamochaeta antWana Caribbean purple everlasting
Heliolropium po!vphvllum Pineland heliou'ope
!/ex cassine Dahoon hollv, Dahoon
Linaria canadensis Canadian toad flax
Melaleuca quinquenerviaG Punk tree, Melaleuca, Paper bark I
Mikania scandens Climbino hemovine
Mvrica cerifera Wax mvrtle, Southem bavberrv
Nymphoides aqllatica Big floatingheart, Banana lilv
Osmunda reflalis vaT. svectabilis Roval fern C
Oyolis spp. Wood Sorrel
Panicum hemitomon Maidencane
Conservation Collier Program
54
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2'" DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manal!emenl Plan Page 57 of 60
Appendix 2 (continued). Preliminary Floristic Inventory of the Milano Preserve.
Milano Preserve: Preliminarv Plant List
Flora recorded by: Christal Segura, Annisa Karim, Dr. George Wilder
Pasvalum monostachvum Gulfdune Daspalum
Parietaria floridana Florida Dellitorv
Persea borbonia Red bav
Phlebodium aureum Golden polypody
Ph)'la nodiflora Turkev tangle fogfruit. CaDeweed
Pinus el/iottU var. densa South Florida slash Dine
Piriaueta cistoides Pitted stripeseed
Pluchea haccharis Rosv camphorweed
Psi/alum nudum Wisk fern
Polvgala vio/acea Showy milkwort
Rooanea mme/ata Mvrsine, Colicwood
RhvnchosDora inundala Narrowfruit homed beaksedge; Inundated beak-rush
Rubus n'ivialis Sothern dewberrv
Sabai nalmello Cabbage palm
Saelllarla lalifolia Broadleaf arrowhead, Common arrowhead, duck potato
Sorcos/emma clausum \Vhtie m'inevine
Serenoa renens Saw palmetto
Shinus lerebinlhofolious a Brazillian pepper I
Sideroxvlon celastrinum Saffron plum. Bumelia
Smilax auriculala EarIeaf greenbrier
Spennacoce verticil/at a a Shrubby false buttonweed
Ta1:odium SOD. Cvpress
Thalia eenieuiala Allioatorflag. Fireflag
Theiyplerls SOD. Shield fern
Tillandsia balbisiana Reflexed wild-pine, Northern needleleaf T
Tillandsia fasdculata Stiff-leaved wild-pine, Cardinal airolant E
Tillandsia usneoides Soan ish-moss
Tillandsia vaueifolia Potbellv airDlant
Tillandsia reclIrl'ala Balhnoss
Tillandsia scIacca southern needleleaf
Toxicodendron radicans Eastern poison-ivy
Urena /obara a Caesarweed II
Vicia acutifolia F ourleaf vetch
Viola lanceo/ata Boo white violet
Vilis rotund;folia Muscadine, Muscadine grape
a Non-native species that mayor may 1101 hm'e FLEPPC designations illr .','11\,,,,' 11:/1.-'11 ;fi09
" Slate listed species: T = Threatened,' E = Endangered; C = Commerciall)' E.tploited
C Florida E'wtic Pest Plant COllncil (FLEPPC) 2007 designations
I: Invasive, exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing
structures or ecological functions, or h.vbridizing with natives.
II: lnvasive, exotics that have increased in abundance or fi-equency but have not yet altered Florida plant
communities to the extent shown hy CategOl}' T .'..pedes.
Conservation Collier Program
55
Agenda Item No. 15E3
April 14, 2009
2"' DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazement Plan Page 58 of 50
Appendix 3. Florida Natural Areas Inventory Report for the Milano Preserve
-
Im'~mm ., I
"r fTPRID-"t "'-.
1~A-'P1rA- rTTeA-5
INVi:NTORY
Florida Natural Areas Inventory
Biodiversity Matrix Query Results
WlOffICIAl REPORT
Created 9/25/2008
(Cont<lct FNAI Data Services Coordinator
for an officilll Standard Data Report)
NOTE; The Biodiversity Matrix indudes only rare sj>E!cies and natural communities tracked try FNAL
Report for 1 Matrix Unit: 40546
Descriptions
DOCUMENTED. There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community within this
Matrix Unit.
DOCUMENTED-HISTORIC ~ There is a documented occurrence in the FNAI database of the species or community
within this Matrix Unit; however the occurrence has not been observed/reported within the last twenty years.
LIKELY - The species or community is known to occur in this vicinity, and is considered likely within this Matrix Unit
because:
1. documented occurrence overlaps this and adjacent Matrix Units, but the documentation isn't precise enough to
indicate which of those Units the species or community is actually located in; or
2. there is a documented occurrence in the vicinity and there is suitable habitat for that species or community
within this Matrix Unit.
POTENTIAL - This Matrix Unit lies within the known or predicted range of the speCies or community based on expert
knowledge and environmental variables such as climate, soils, topography, and landcover.
Matrix Unit 10: 40546
o Documented Elements Found
o Documented-Historic Elements Found
3 Likely Elements Found
Scientific and Common Names
Global State Federal State
Rank Rank Status Listing
G4 S4 N N
G4 S2 LE LE
GST1 Sl LE LE
Mesic flatwoods
Mycteria americana
Wood Stork
Puma conca/or coryi
Florida Panther
Matrix Unit 10: 40546
18 Potential Elements for Matrix Unit 40546
Scientific and Common Names
Global
Rank
state
Rank
Federal
Status
State
Listing
Andropogon arctatus
Pine-woods Bluestem
Athene cunicularia floridana
Florida Burrowing Owl
G3
S3
N
LT
G4T3
S3
N
LS
Conservation Collier Program
56
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2'" DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manazement Plan Page 59 of 60
Appendix 3 (continued). Florida Natural Areas Inventory Report for the Milano Preserve
~~i!~rt1~f~:tr&t~~,
state'i"'; Federaf.i!ll#,lii' s~i<l:!!lt~:i'<
Ra k~ ~,< JJi~"""Llstl ~<!i':'l:.
~'L.:,~}~_, -?LiII1;_U~i,~;10blt " _ ''''_., J"g,-J;::';!'~:;;.t;
Corynorhinus rafinesquii
Rafinesque's Big-eared Bat
Drymarchon couper;
Eastern Indigo Snake
Elytraria caroliniensis var. angustifolia
Narrow-leaved Carolina Scalystem
Eumops flor/danus
Florida bonneted bat
Gopherus polyphemus
Gopher Tortoise
Lechea cernua
Nodding Pinweed
Linum carter; var. smallii
Small's flax
Mustela frenata peninsulae
Florida Long-tailed Weasel
Nemastyfis floridana
Celestial Lily
Picaides borealis
Red-cockaded Woodpecker
Po{yrrhiza lindenii
Ghost Orchid
Pteroglossdspis ecristata
Giant Orchid
Rostrhamu$ sociabilis plumbeus
Snail Kite
Sceloporus woodi
Florida Scrub Uzard
Sciurus niger avicennia
Mangrove Fox Squirrel
UrsU$ americanus fforidanus
Florida Black Bear
G3G4 52 N N
G3 53 LT LT
G4T2 52 N N
G1 51 N LE
G3 53 N LT
G3 53 N LT
G2T2 52 N LE
GST3 53 N N
G2 52 N LE
G3 52 LE L5
G2G4 52 N LE
G2G3 52 N LT
G4G5T3Q 52 LE LE
G3 53 N N
G5T2 52 N LT
G5T2 52 N LT*
Disclaimer
The data maintained by the Florida Natura! Areas Inventory represent the single most comprehensive source of
information available on the locations of rare species and other significant ecological resources statewide. However, the
data are not always based on comprehensive or Site-specific field surveys. Therefore, this information should not be
regarded as a final statement on the biological resources of the site being considered, nor should it be substituted for
on-site surveys. FNAI shall not be held liable for the accuracy and completeness of these data, or opinions or
conclusions drawn from these data. FNAI is not inviting reliance on these data. Inventory data are designed for the
purposes of conservation planning and scientific research and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for
regulatory decisions.
Unofficial Report
These results are considered unofficial. FNAI offers a Standard Data Request option for those needing certifiable data.
Conservation Collier Program
57
Agenda Item No. 16E3
April 14, 2009
2nd DRAFT Milano Preserve Land Manarzement Plan Page 60 of 60
Appendix 4. Existing and Proposed Preserves on the Terafina, Parklands and Mirasol Planned
Unit Developments. The Milano Preserve is outlined in red.
hi!!! "
'l~" !:
Ii -l.. '~J S
.,h..,
!l:ll~:;f ': ~
, .
, .
Iii,
.lil'~_l:! :
; a .1 t i ~
, I"
; ~ ; ~
" i
~ I -
''ll .
:- ,;:1:::
11'~ttH
.J ~
O ~
UI
IX:
a-
fA 0
~i ~
z
( '"
:e
Q.
o
rt ~
U. ~
Uf~ '.
~t;" "
I" .H
., ."
H~
i
.',;!
... " ..
...::z- '"1!
-"1 ;
iil t~
~~ "'.
>-~:' ~ !
. .
-,' :':.- "'.
m - -~
.f t
'1
Conservation Collier Program
58