Agenda 03/10/2009 Item #17D
p,oenda item No. ~17D
~ March 10, 2009
Page 1 of 113
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The
Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for the
incorporation by refercnce of the impact fcc study entitled the "Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study" dated February 19,2009; amending the
road impact fee rate schedule that is Schedule One of Appendix "A" by
incorporating the findings of the study and thereby establishing the new impact fee
rates; deleting obsolete provisions referring to "Director of Financial
Administration and Housing" and the "Educational Impact Fee Trust Fund;"
providing clarification to the four year timeframe to request an impact fee
reimbursement by removing obsolete language; amending the special requirements
for road impact fees to reflect the new provisions, allowing for payment over five
years, to obtain or extend a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities; directing the
County Manager, or his designee, and the County Attorney to amend the Collier
County Land Development Code for consistency with the provisions related to the
Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities and to update the "Collier County
Administration Proccdures Manual for the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee
Ordinance" to reflect the new and amended provisions related to impact fees; and
providing for a delayed effective date of .June 8, 2009, in accordance with the 90-day
notiee period required by Section 163.31801 (3)(d), Florida Statutes
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopt an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collicr County Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code)
providing for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the "Collier
County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study" (Update Study) dated February 19,
2009; amending the road impact fee rate schedule that is Schedule One of Appcndix A
by incorporating the findings of the study and thereby establishing the new impact fee
rates; deleting obsolete provisions referring to the "Director of Financial Administration
and Housing" and the "Educational Impact Fee Trust Fund;" providing clarification to the
four year timeframe to request an impact fee reimbursement by removing obsolete
language; amending the special requirements for road impact fees to reflect the new
provisions, allowing for payment over five ycars, to obtain or extend a Certificate of
Adequate Public Facilities; directing the County Manager, or his designee, and the
County Attorney to amend the Collicr County Land Development Code for consistency
with the provisions rclated to the Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities and to update
the "Collier County Administration Procedures Manual for the Collier County
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance" to reflect the new and amended provisions related
to impact fees; and providing for a delayed effective date of June 8, 2009, in accordance
with the 90-day notice period required by Section 163.31801 (3)(d), Florida Statutes.
_.
CONSIDERATIONS: Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for
growth-related capital improvements related to tram;pOitation since 1985. On i\.pril 25,
2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006-19 thereby amending Schedule One of
!,:.::'II'I \0. :7D
f"k:>~~:h ~!J 2:JC9
Page 2 Df 1 ',3
Appendix "A" of Chapter 74 of the Code, and establishing the County's then current
Road Impact Fce rates. Further, on June 26, 2007, tbe Board adoptcd Ordinance No.
2007.57 incorporating the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" through which
the Road Impact Fees were indexed in accordance with the prescribed methodology,
thereby establishing the rates that are cUlTently in effect.
Section 74-502 of the Code states that impact fee studies should be rcviewed at least
every three ycars, therefore, the County retained Tindale-Olivcr and Associates,
Incorporated (Consultant), to review the existing Road Impact Fees and recommend
changes to the fees \vhere appropriate. The Consultant has prepared an ilnpact fee study,
entitlcd "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study," dated February 19,
2009. The attached report describes the technical framcwork and methodology used to
complete this study and has been reviewed by the County's outside legal counsel for legal
sufficiency. The Consultant also completed an updated "Trip Length" Study which
considered recent sampling, prior local studics and additional data throughout the state,
however, based on the direction of the Board, the Trip Length Study will not be
considered at this time. The Consultant has rcvised the Update Study and associated fee
schedule to reflect thc Board's direction. Therefore, the Update Study and fee schedule
being considercd for adoption do not include the new trip length data. This change is
also the basis t,)r the date change of the linal report li'om December 8, 2008 to February
19,2009.
On January 13, 2009, thc Board directed staff to provide a fiscal impact analysis and
review the following items:
. Five year (Capital Improvement Element) CIE Gnaneial feasibility, revenue
projections and needs assessment.
. What would be the fiscal impact to the general fund revenues and
subsequently the taxpayers to supplement the CIE if the Board should adopt
an alternative impact fee rate as proposed by the Productivity Committee?
. What is the status of the un-built residential units and commercial square
footage that has paid the rcquircd 50% initial impact lee and what would be
the fiscal impact associated with a potential change to the payment schedule?
. A review of the concept of defcITing impact fees to building permit in areas
that have adequate capacity.
.,."
On Fcbruary 10, 2009, dUling the regular meeting of Ule Board of County Commissioners
(Item lOA) stalf provided a detailed presentation related to the issues above. Also
discussed was the new TIip Lcngth Study, 35 identified 3bove. The inj~)nnati()n included
in the Executive Summary for Item lOA associated to the points abovc has been added as
an aLLachrrlenl (AUachmenl "A") to this Executive SUIl1111aIY for reference. At the
conclusion of this itelu the Board directed that the proposed Update Study and associated
I't';:;:'i:'j \'), i:'D
L c-w:~h' O. 20~:9
:~ (j 1 i 1 .3
fee schedule, with the Trip Length Study removed, be brought back for Board
consideration and approval. Additionally, the Board directed that procedures be
developed to allow for the uplront payments of road impact fees required to obtain or
cxtend a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities (COA) be paid ovcr a five year pcriod.
Staff and the County Attomey have drafted the attached Ordinance amendmcnt in
accordance with the Board's dircction. Thc new provisions related to the COA payments
are included in Section 74.302 whieh scts forth special requirements for road impact fees.
The new requirements, if adopted, are in conflict with the provisions of Section 10.02.07
of the Collier County Land Development Code which require that 50% of the estimated
road j]npact fees for the project be paid prior to the issuance of a final local development
order (Site Developmcnt Plan or Plat) in order to obtain a COA. The COA is then issued
for a period ofthrec years. At the conelusion of the first three year tC1111, the remaining,
estimated 50% balance is due and upon payment the COA is issued in perpetuity, which
secures the transportation vesting for the projcct. Therefi:>re as set f011h in the proposed
Ordinance, the provisions of Chapter 74 of the Code will be read in conjunction with
10.02.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code and "to the extent [his provision
conflicts ...vith this or with ol1Y othcr Collier County ordinallce, rule or regulation. the
provisions of this sectioll shall colltrol" until such time that thc Land Development Code
is amended for consistency with these provisions. By way of this Executive Summary
staff is requesting that the Board direct staff to amcnd the Land Development Code
during the next available cycle.
The proposed program, as outlined in the presentation on February 10, 2009, was
developed with the input of local developers, and development representatives. The
fo lIowing is a brief explanation of the new program:
New Develonments Seeking to Obtain a COA - Applicant will be required to pay
20% of the total estimated mad impact fees for the pmject, based on the rates in
effect at the time of the issuance of the pre-approval letter for the final local
development order. The applicant also must provide security, acceptable to the
County and approved by the County Attomey, equal to 20% of the estimated road
impact fees for the project, with a teml of five years. The COA will be issued for
a period of five years. Payments will be made ovcr the five years equal to a
minimum of 20% per year. Upon payment of 100% of the balance of the
estimated impact fees, the certificate will be issued in perpetuity and the dedicated
security will be re1cascd. No further advance payments will he due once actual
road impact fees are paid cqual to the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees. Failure to submit payment in accordance with the provisions of this
suhsection shall authorize the County to facilitate payment by way of tbe
dedicated security and the tcmporary certificate of public facility adequacy may
be revoked alter being referred to the Board of County Commissioners for their
review and direction.
Developments Seeking to Extend an Existing or Expired C'OA - Applicant will be
required to pay 20% of the balance of remaining estimated road impact fees (J 0%
oftbe total estimated road impact fees) Jor the project, based on the rates in effect
Item ~;J. ',7D
~k;r{T 20C;ZJ
" cf': 13
at the time of the issuance of tlIC pre-approval letter Jor the final local
development order. The applicant also must provide security, acceptable to the
County and approved by the County Attorney, equal to 20% of the balance of the
remaining estimated road impact fees for the project, with a tcnn of five years.
The COA will be issued for a period of five years. Payments will be made over
the five years equal to a minimum of 20% per year. Upon payment of 100% of
the balance of the remaining estimated impact fees, the certificate will be issued
in perpctuity and the dcdicatcd security will be relcased. No further advance
payments will be due once actual road impact fees arc paid equal to the balance of
the remaining estimated transportation inlpact fees. Failure to submit payment in
accordance with the provisions of this subsection shaiJ authorize the County to
facilitate paymcnt by way of the dedicated sccurity and the temporary certificate
of public facility adequacy may be revoked after being refelTcd to the Board of
County Commissioners for their review and direction. Developments seeking to
extend a COA that previously expircd must remit the first required payment and
security within 30 days ofthc cffective date of this Ordinance.
The "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study" and proposed rate
schedule changes were prescnted to thc Productivity Committee on December 17, 2008
for their review, comments and recommendations. By a majOlity vote, the committee
recommcnded the following: "the Update Study be adopted but the new rates not be
implemented for a period of two ycars and instcad that the Road Impact Fees be rolled
back to the rates effective June 30, 2006.
On December 3, 2008 and January 7, 2009 the "Collier County Transportation Impact
Fee Update Study" and proposcd rate schedule changes, including the Trip Length Study
werc presented to the Development Serviccs Advisory Committee (DSAC) for review
and considcrat ion. The DSAC, by majority vote recommcndcd that the Update Study not
bc adoptcd. This rccommcndation was based on the economic downtul11 and not related
to the quality or tcchnicalmerits of the study. The DSAC supported the recommendation
by the Productivity Committee to roiJback to the June 3D, 2D06 ratcs. Otherwise, the
DSAC recommended that the Board of County Commissioners Icavc all impact fees at
their current rates.
Three additional issues are also contemplated in this Ordinance Amendment outside of
the sections that are being amended for consistency with thc Update Study and Board
direction relatcd to COA payments. These changes are as follows:
I. Deletion of an obsolete provision referrinz to the Director of Financial
Administration and HOllsinz - This is an obsolete rcference to a position
that no longer exists. The refercncc has becn removed and replaced with
"County Manager" for the purpose of the sub-section.
,1em ~,iO. 17D
!-'_"131';~h 10, 2C!Ci9
S:if 113
2. Deletion of an obsolete provision referrinl! to an "Educational Impact Fee
Trust Fund" - The reference to this Trust Fund is being removed as it is not a
Fund that cUlTcntly exists.
3. Providinl! clarification to tbe four veal' timeframe to request an impact
fee reimbursement - This change provides for the removal of ambiguous
language in order to clarify that rcqucsts for reimbursement of impact fees
must be submitted within four years of payment, which is also consistent with
lilnitatiol1S set forth by the Florida Statutes.
The Board also directed that the provisions of the Code as well as other applicable
rcgulations be reviewed to detem1inc the appropriateness of adopting this impact fee
update via resolution instead of ordinance. Section 74-201 (b) of the Code provides the
following:
"ImpactJce rates... These impactJee rates n/aJ' he changed.fi'om time-to-time by
board resolutions or by Collier County Ordinances provided, in cverv instance,
the board advertises a notice of a scheduled public hearing in a newspaper of
gencral circulation in Collier County with regard to the then proposed impactlce
schedule amendmel1ls.
Further, Section 74-106 provides:
"Adoption ofimpactfec studies...ln accordance 1\'ith the Florida Impact Fee Act,
F.s. ,1\' 163.31801: (I) allupda/es or supplements thereto, and any new studies,
must be based on the most recent ond localized data, and (2) notice of the new or
amended impact fee must be provided no less than YO days before the effective
dale oj'the ordinance or resolution imposing the new or amended impaetJce."
Thcrefore, for the purposes of the adoption of this Update Study and associated fee
schedule, an adveliiscd notice must be provided in order to meet the rcquirements of the
Code and Florida Statutes. Additionally, due to the changes directed by the Board
pertaining to the timing of payments to obtain or extend a COA, new provisions are being
added to the Code; therefore the ordinance amendment format is appropriate and ensures
that all changes will he codified. Because of the requirement for legal advertising, there
is no cost savings, in this case, betwccn the use of the resolution or ordinance fonnat.
Finally, staff is requesting that the Board direct that the "Collier County Administration
Procedures Manual I<lr the Collier County Consolidatcd Impact Fee Ordinance" be
updated to reflect current impact fee provisions and programs, including those
contemplated through this Ordinance amcndment. Such updates will he presented to thc
Board at a futurc meeting I<lr consideration and approval for incorporation by reference
into Chapter 74 of the Code.
,D..aenda Item r~o. 170
J f\;2rch 10. 2009
Pads 6 of 113
FISCAL IMPACT:
Below is a side-by-side sample comparison of examples of current and proposed rates for
several common residential and commercial land uses.
Land Use Current Rate Proposed Rate Dollar Change
Single-Family $11,522.55 $10.3 72.00 ($1,150.55)
2,000 sq. ft. living per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit
area
Condorr ownhouse $7,858.52 $7,725.00 ($133.52)
1-2 stories per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit
High.Rise Condo $5,488.90 $5,526.00 $37.10
3+ Stories per dwelling unit per dweiling unit per dwelling unit
Retail $18,097.04 $19,823.00 $1,725.96
< 50,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office $20,074.97 $16,763.00 ($3,311.97)
< 50,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1.000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
I
Home Improvement $17,141.15 $9,901.00 ($7,240.15)
Superstore per 1.000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
General Light $9,176.28 $7,732.00 ($1,394.28)
Industrial per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Church $10,404.53 $R,619.00 ($1,785.53)
per 1,000 sq. ft. I per 1,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Drive-in Bank $108,545.93 $40,158.00 ($68,387.93)
per 1.000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. per ],000 sq. ft.
:lenl hlo. 170
iv,arch 10. 2009
;:>3g8 7 of 113
Revenue projections depend heavily on the pernlitting trends during the time period of
the impact fee change (increase or decrease). Any changes in permitting activity
associated with the size of new homes and/or types and square footage of commercial and
other non-residential buildings being constructed in Collier County will directly affect
this impact fee revenue stream.
Any permits that are "in process" via a complete building permit application are not
subject to imposition of revised impact fees and in accordance with Section 163.31801,
Florida Statutes \vhich requires i."that notice be provided no less than 90 du.vs bEfore the
effective date qf an ordinance or re~\'()llltiol1 imposing a I1C1V or amended impact fee."
Therefore, the new road impact fee rates, associated to this Update Study, will apply to
all residential and commercial penn its, requiring the assessment of impact fees, applied
for on or after June 8, 2009.
By way of the adoption of the Update Study, not including the new trip length data, and
corresponding rate schedule the averal!e decrease in impact fees for the residential
categories is G% and the averal!e decrease in the commercial (non-residential) categories
is 18%. However, it should be noted that while the average decrease is 6% and 18% for
residential and commercial categories, respectively, some rates are increasing, for
example Retail (< 50,000 square feet) is increasing by approximately 9.5% and High-
Rise Condo is increasing by slightly less than I (~Io. Othcr rates are experiencing
significant downward adjustments, i.e. Home Improvement Superstore with a 42%
decrease.
Based on the information above, as well as Road Impact Fee collections from recent,
historical pennitting activity and current permitting activity and forecasts, the reduction
in revenue associated to the proposed Update Study and implementation of the
cOlTesponding rate schedule is estimated to be approximately $4 million or 15% of
annual collections. Additionally, as provided in the Executive Summary for Item lOA on
February 10, 2009, the provisions to allow the payment of the required upfi'ont road
impact fees in five (5) annual equal payments, to obtain or extend a COA, would
maintain the integrity of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) but may require a
rebalancing of the schedule. Additionally, these provisions may provide additional
stability to the revenue structure, as applicants are able to make smaller up front payments
over the five year period and may be encouraged to pay for their COA rather than
foregoing the project or allowing their COA to expire.
There may be further negative impacts on revenue collections associated to road impact
fees due to the mandatory 90-day delay in implementation, as applicants may wait to pay
the required up front road impact fees related to the approval of new Site Plans or Plats,
etc. or apply for building permits until after the effective date of Junc 8, 2009.
As stated above, any changes in pennitting activity and trends associated with the size of
new homes and/or commercial and other non-residential buildings being constructed in
Collier County will directly afTect this impact fee revenue stream.
/\genda li8m hlo. 170
March 10.2009
Page 8 of 113
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Objective 1.2 of the Capital Improvement
Element (CIE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) states: "Future
development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvcments neccssitated by
growth. "
Impact Fees generate funds to be expended for capital improvements to public facilities
necessitated by growth. However, impact fee assessment must be equitable and may not
exceed the anlount reasonably anticipated to offset the demand on public facilities
generated by the developlnent. The Update Study also recon1mends establishing the
proposed impact fee rates in order to equitably distribute the costs of acquiring and
constructing public facilities based upon a rational nexus relating costs incurred by fee
payers to infrastructure impacts created by commercial and residential land uses.
Additionally, the Update Study is consistent with Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes,
which is the Florida Impact Fee Act 2006, requiring the most recent and localized data be
used in impact fee calculations.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The County Attomey worked with staff on this
Ordinance Amendment, which is legally sufficient for Board action. Although this is a
regular agenda item, since this Ordinance is in conflict with existing provisions of the
Land Development Code, this item will require 4 affilmative votes. Lastly, the County
Attomey requests that the Board direct Staff to include these changes to the LDC in the
next LDC cycle. -JAK
RECOMMENDA TION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances providing for
the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the "Collier County
TranspOltation Impact Fee Update Study" dated February 19, 2009; anlcnding the road
impact fee rate schedule that is Schedule One of Appendix A by incorporating the
findings of the study and thereby establishing the new impact fee rates; deleting obsolete
provisions referring to the "Director of Financial Administration and Housing" and the
"Educational Impact Fee Trust Fund;" providing elarification to the four year timeframe
to request an impact fee reimbursement by removing obsolete language; amending the
special requircments for road impact fees to reflect the new provisions, allowing for
payment over five years, to obtain or extend a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities;
directing the County Manager, or his designee, and the County Attomey to amend the
Collier County Land Development Code for consistency with the provisions related to
the Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities and to update the "Collier County
Administration Procedures Manual for the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee
Ordinance" to reflect the new and amended provisions related to impact fees; and
providing for a delayed effective date of June 8, 2009, in accordance with the 90-day
notice period required by Section 163.31801 (3)(d), Florida Statutes. As set forth by the
County Attorney, this item will require 4 affimlative votes.
Prepared by: Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Page 1 of 2
item No. 17D
March 10.2009
f) of113
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMiSSIONERS
170
The approval of this item needs to be done with a Super Majority vote Recommendation that
the Board of County Commi;;;sioners adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Lm\'s and Ordinances (The CGllier County Corlsolidated Impact Fee
Ordinance) providing for the incorporation by reference of the irnpact fee study enli:led the
Collier County Transportation impact ree Update Study dated Febr-uary 19,2009; amending
the road impact fee rate schedule that is Schedule One of Appendix A by incorporating the
findings of the stlJdy and thereby establishing the rle\.v impClct fee rates: deleting obsolete
provisions referring to Director of FlIlcHlcial AdrTllnistrarion and Housing and the Educationai
impact ~ee Trust ~und p,.ovld,ng clilr~!1C:3t'c)n to the tDur /e3r ti'1let,i'L"1C to re::;uest em imp3ct
fee reimbursement by removing obsolete language amending (he special requirements for
rGad ImpClct fees 10 reflect thf' new provi~,iCtns allOWing for payment over five years, to obtain
or extend a Certificate of Adequi'lte Public Facilities directing the County Manager. or his
designee. ,1Ild the County Attorney to arnend the Collier County Land Development Code for
consistency With the provisions reiated 10 the Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities and to
update the Collier County Administration Procedures Manual for the Collier County
Consolidated impact Fee Ordinance to refiect the new and amended provisions related to
i:Tl;J3:::;t f08S and ::Jlovidi:,g for OJ dc:aycd effective C~itC' of June 8. 200S' in Clccordance ',vith
the 90- day notice period requiied hy Section 1::3.31801 (31(d), Florida Statutes
3/10/20099:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Amy Patterson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Impact Fee Mar,zqcr
:Jate
Financial Admin. & Housing
3/2/20099:15:56 AM
ApproYCd H}'
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Date
CommunIty Development &
Environmental Services Admin.
]'2/20099:31 AM
ApproYCd By
Norm E. Feder, A!CP
Transportation $';!rvices
Transportation Division Administrator
Date
TransportCltion Services Admin.
3'2.120-::0910:16 AM
Approved 3y
Nick Casaianguida
Tral1sportatiorl Services
MPO Directur
Date
Transportation Planning
3/7./200910:22 AM
ApPI'o\'ed B.y
Jeff Kbt:.:ycw
CO;Jl1ty Attornl?Y
Assist<lnt County Attorney
Dil:e
County Attorney Office
3J2/2009 10:51 AM
Approved By
Joseph K. Schmitt
Commun:ty [)eveiopment &
::!wironms'rta! Servi::'2s
Community Developmel1t &
t::nvil'onmei;;:ai Services AUllllnstrator
Dilte
CommUi'.ily DeV0i{)pm'~nl &.
:::nvironmei:ta! SOfV!C:!2$ .^.8'min.
3:2/200912:52 PM
fil",./Ir.\ t\ (1pn,-hTp.;:t\b'...-nnrt\ 1 '1 ,,_I\,h,,{'ho/^ '1n 1 no;;:. In'1nnm 1 7 0;;:' ')nCT 11\111\11 A D VO/,. '1n ^ (~r~1\IT,") ^
"'::/,1/')nno
A pproYCd By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Page 20f2
,~'Jencj3 IterTi h10. 170
Iv'larch ~ 0 2('109
~ C: of 1 ': 3
OMS Coordinator
Date
Office of M?nagement & Budget
3/2/20091:18 PM
ApproYCd By
Mark Isackson
County Manl'lger'R Office
Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
3/2120093:53 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
County Manager's Office
Senior Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management 8. Budget
3/3/2009 12:22 PM
Approved By
James V. Mudd
Board of County
Commissioners
County Manager
Date
County Manager's Office
3:3/2009 3 :47 PM
filp..llr.\ A o-Pllr1<;lTp.<;,t\J:~"ll(\l*f\l ')'_M<;lri'ho/.....'){) 1 () 0/.....') ()') ()()Q\ 170/..... 7{),11M1\A A Ryo/.....7{)Ar:.r'1\.lnA
1/A!7nnO
AgervJa Hem No. 170
rdar::::h 10. 20Cl9
P3ge 11 of '13
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, THAT
ORDINANCE BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
IMPACT FEE ORDINA!>ICE, NO. 2001-13, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING
FOR THE INCORPORATION, BY REFERENCE, OF THE IMPACT FEE
STUDY EI'TITLED "COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT
FEE UPDATE STUDY"; AMENDING THE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE
SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE ONE OF APPENDIX A, AS SET
FORTH IN THE IMPACT FEE PDATE STUDY; UPDATING THE
GENERAL DEFINITIONS SECTION; PROVIDING FOR REMOVAL OF
OBSOLETE LANGUAGE RELATED TO THE PROVISIONS FOR
REIMBURSEMENT OF IMPACT FEES WITHIN FOUR YEARS OF
PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF AN OBSOLETE
REFERENCE TO THE "EDUCATIONAL IMPACT FEE TRUST FUND";
PROVIDING FOR REMOVAL OF AN OBSOLETE REFERENCE TO
THE "DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION AND
HOUSING"; PROVIDING FOR THE INCLUSION OF PROVISIONS
RELATED TO OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF ADEQUATE PUBLIC
FACULTIES WITH RESPECT TO ROAD IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING
FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION
IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR
A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 8, 2009.
WHEREAS, Collier County has used impaet fees as a funding source for growth-related
capital improvements for transportation since 1985; and
WHEREAS, on March 13,2001, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted
Ordinance No. 20OT-13. the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Laws and Ordinances (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, on April 25, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006-19, thereby
amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Code, and establishing the
County's then current Road Impact Fee rates; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2007-57 incorporating
the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" through which Road Impact Fee were indexed
in accordance with the prescribed methodology, thereby establishing the rates that are currcntly
in effect; and
Page 1 of 13
lJnderlined text is added; Strud: threugh text is deleted
,.' .+"....<<~.,:'...,^,..",._c~,.".... ~,____:~ ~.'~".'., ""0
Ag<;.mda item ~~o. 17D
fvlarch 10, 2009
Page 12 of 1: 3
WHEREAS, as Section 74-502 of the Code states that impact fee studies should be
reviewed at least every three years, the County retained Tindale-Oliver and Associates,
Incorporated (the "Consultant"), to review the existing Road Impact Fees and recommend
changes to the fees where appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has prepared an impact fee study entitled "Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study," dated February 19,2009 (the "Study"); and
WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary
capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by growth in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the Study recommends changes to the Road Impact Fee rate schedule, as
set forth in Schedule One of Appendix "A" of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws
and Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the Study also recommends establishing the proposed impact fee rates in
order to equitably distribute the costs of acquiring and constructing public facilities based upon a
rational nexus relating costs incurrcd by fec paycrs to infrastructure impacts created by
commcrcial and residential land uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners directed that
the provisions related to the upfront payment of road impact fees to obtain or extend a Certificate
of Adequate Public Facilities be amended to allow for payments over a five-year period and
therefore such language has been included in this Ordinance consistent with that direction; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance also updates the general definitions provided for in Section
74-108 of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances for consistency with
the updated Study and rate schedule and removes obsolete provisions related to the
reimbursement of impact fees, an obsolete reference to the Director of the Financial
Administration and Housing Department and an obsolete reference to the Educational hnpact
Fee Trust Fund; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has reviewed and updated the fee calculation methodologies
that will be imposed in an equitable and non-discriminatory manner; aaId
WHEREAS, Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act,
requires the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee calculations and this study
complies with that requirement; and
Page 2 of 13
Underlined text is added; StmeL tAr0l'lgh text is deleted
;'\,genda item h!o. 'i 70
fdarch 10. 2D09
Page 13 of 113
WHEREAS, the study methodology has been reviewed and approved by Collier
County's outside legal counsel, Nabors, Giblin and Nickerson, P.A.; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and findings, concurs with
the recommended changes to the Road Impact Fee rate schedule, and recommends that the Board
of County Commissioners adopt this Ordinance to implement the recommended changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE. Article I, General, Section 74-106, Adoption of impact fee studies. of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-106.
Adoption of impact fee studies.
***
(l) Transportation facilities: "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update
Study," prepared by Tindale.Oliver and Associates, Incorporated (/\pril 2006
February 19,2009)
***
SECTION TWO. Article I, General, Section 74.108, General definitions. of the Collier
County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows;
Section 74-108. General definitions.
When used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless
the context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms contained in article lIT or the rate schedules
supercede these general definitions to the extent of any conflict(s).
Access improvements shall mean improvements designed and constructed to provide safe
and adequate ingress and/or egress to and/or from the respective development, which
include, but are not limited to, rights-of-way, casements, paving of adjacent or connecting
roadways, turn lanes, deceleration and/or acceleration lanes, traffic control devices,
sign age and markings, drainage facilities, and utility facilities. An access improvement is
a site related improvement.
***
Adult cengregatc !i'.'ing o'ad!'t}' (f.CLF) "Ball mear. resideEtial facilities tl1at cOllsist ef
ORe Of lI10re \Juildiflgs desigRed Of used for elderly liyiR:;. Taey may also contain diRiRg
reams, medical facilities, aHd recreational facilities. TBe primary cBaracteristics tl1at
distingHiGl1 l.eLF's ITom nursin:; homes or aSGistod Ii, iR; facilities (/\LF's) are tl1e
ability ofthe residents to care for them~
Page 3 of J J
Underlined text is added; Struel: TRrEl1:lgR text is deleted
***
***
***
***
***
1:2:1: r'~O, ~i 7D
[,,18rc:h 1 C1. 2009
Pc;;:Je ~.~ uf 113
All suites hotel shall mean places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations, a
small restaurant and lounge and a small amount of meeting space. Each suite includes a
bedroom; a sitting room and lor limited kitchen facilities may be provided within the
suite.
Automated car wash shall mean a use that allows for tbe mechanical cleaning of the
exterior of vehicl~s. Jv[anual cleaning and car detailing may also take place at these
facilities.
Bav shall mean a snace where a vehicle can be serviced.
Boat berth shall mean a wet or dry space to dock or store vessels.
Condominium shall mean an..sinsle family or time sharins ownership unit that has at least
one other similar owned unit within the same building structure. The teRTI cOl1aominium
inchldes all foe simple or title multi unit structHres, incbding townhouscs or aHJ3lexos.
***
Dance studio/lZvm shall mean privately owned facilities that offer dance, gymnastics,
ballet or similar activity classes.
***
Elementwy school (vrivate) shall mean a school typically serving students attending
kindergarten through the fifth or sixth grade. Elementary schools are usually centrally
located in residcntial communities in order to facilitate student access, and they have no
student drivers. This land use eonsists of pOOlt€ private schools where bus service is
usually provided to students living beyond a specified distance from the school.
***
FuelinlZ vosition shall mean the number of vehicles that can he fueled simultaneously at a
service station.
***
Furniture store shall mean a full. service retail facilitv that specializes in the sale of
furniture and often carpeting. Furniture stores are generally large and may include
storage areas.
***
Ceneral indHstriaJ/indHstrial shail mean a use for the J3HlfIElSC of basic J3rocessing aaa
ffiilB-u-f-actuflflg--B-fmat-erials' or products- predemin-a-t-cl y-frem- -exifaet-ea-of-fav,' mG.t:;:i~ls,---ef
~ use f~- fh...... ........:-;J~....r. ~-r th~ ~t~T"~~ c-r nr Inar..-r3~fn_:n7 -nr~~Mn~3 Il~in~ fl"mmrl'hle r.r
~ ~ ,,",~ U~_ t-'-~ ...,,,.... '"'~ H~_ ~ ....~.:;._ ~, ~~ . ~~~ ......uu 1:> 1:' ...._'_'~__ _::> _uuu.... -
eJlplosiye materials, or stora;e or manHfaeturin; jlrocesses that potcatiallJ' ilJ','ElI\'e
Page 4 of 13
Underling;! text is added; Str[,1d~ tl1reugh text is deleted
***
***
***
***
***
"e!lIl-h. if)
;:J"C -: ii). ~ ;;,C)
-:S Jf 1 i 'j
hazardous or commonly roeo;''fli;~ed offensive conditions; also a use for the purpOSO oftAo
manufacture, predominantly from pre':iously prepared materials, of finished products or
palis, including processing, fabrication, as::embly, treatment, packagin;, incidencal
,torabe, sales and distrilmtion of sucR flrosucts, but eJ,eluding basic industrial processing.
***
General light industrial shall mean facilities that generally employ fewer than 500
persons. They have an emphasis on activities other than manufacturing and tvpically
have minimal office space. Typical light industrial activities include printing, material
testing and asseJnbly of data processing equipment.
***
Medical office shall mean office space utilized for administering Auman medical aRd
health related services, inelllding elllpatient medical and health whited services, ineluding
outpatient -elinics incidental to SHCA offices. \1edical office llses shall inelude medical
doctors, dentists, psychiatrists, optometrists, osteopaths, cAiroflraetors, natur0paths, nurse
practitionors, health ffiainteflaRee organizations aad similar prokssional and gfOllp
practices, which~reglllated by tile State of Florida. office space that provides
~oscs and outpatient care on a routinc basis generally operated bv one or more
private phvsicians or dentists.
Impact fee rate shall mean the formula or calculation that when applied to the respective
development detcrmines the applicable impact fee that results because of the impacts
deemed by this chapter to be applicable to the respective public facility caused by
particular devclopment. Impact fees are assessed usmg the rates in effect when the
building permit application is submitted.
In:liGr/CS:IlSiWlity co!!c'gc shall mcan two year junior collcgcs or ceffil'l.1tll:ity colluges
wJH.eh arc gencrally separated from other IURd Mses and have exclMsive access points ails
parkins facilities.
Living area shall mean actual square footage of the housing unit. which cOHld be air
eOllditioned or l1eates sllaces contained under roof, or areas llnder mof, eJ'cellt garages,
that arc nom1ally protoctcd against eJ:torior c]eln€lllir.- Excluded from the calculation of
the square footage are carports, attached garages. and porches that are not protected from
weather. Both finished and unfinished basements are to be included.
Lu:n;n-' auto safes shall mean a dealership that sells high-end luxury vehicles such as
Lamborghini, Ferrari. Maserati, Lotu~1?MW and Jaguar. Hours of operation may be less
than a typical auto deaiership.and inventorv may be limited. This classification will be
determined on a case. by-case basis.
Page 5 of ] 3
Underlined text is addcd~ &tfud- tlolf81:1gh lcxt IS deleted
***
!tc:,iTi ~,jJ. o'17D
fv':3i:hi;} 2'](,"9
Pa;;:j ,'~;ufl~3
Mobile home shall mean a detached dwelling unit with all of the following
characteristics: (a) designed for occupancy and containing sleeping accommodations, a
flush toilet, a tub or shower and kitchen facilities with plumbing and electrical
connections provided for attachment to outside systems; (b) designed for transportation
after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels; and (c) arriving at the site
where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete, including major appliances and
furniture, and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and
assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations,
connection to utilities and the like. Although a travel trailer, recreational vehicle, or park
model is not generally considered a mobile home, the applicable impact fee in some
instances may be the same as for a mobile home. For the purposes of computing the
impact fee, a mobile home on a single-family lot (i.e., not located in a mobile home or
similar park) shall be considered a single- family detached house for the purposes of
assessing Road Impact Fees.
Multiple-family dwelling units shall mean apartments that are rental dwelling units
located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units. Units that are
individually owned are classified as condo/townhouse. a groUfl of two or more d';/slling
uflits within a single cerr/entioflal13uildiflg, attached side by side or eRe aeovc thc other,
or beth, and wherciR each dwelliflg liRit may be indiviaually owned or loased mutHally on
land which is under commOfl or single ownership. for purposos of determining wlwther-a
lot is in multiple family lJses, the f-olls';,'iflg consideratiOfls shall apply:
(l) Multiple family a'.\'ollil1g liSOS may invoh'e d'.velling units intonded to be
rented and maiBtained liBder c-entral ownorship and maflagemont, or cooperati'ie
apal1ments. It may include the fee ownership of land beneath each dwelling lIDit
follo'Nin;:; de','elopment from a common base of ownership.
(2) ,^.BY multiple family dwelliBg iB which d'.yellin;:; units are available for rental
for periods of 13ss than one week shall be 60Rsidered a tOlirist home a motel
, ,
motor hotel or hotel, as the caGe may be.
t.B For the purpose of calculating water and/or sewer impact fee, the following
shall be considered to be multiple family dwelling units: guesthouse, servants'
quarters, in-law apartment, townhouse and adult congregate living facility.
***
Res3rt hate! shall mean land "ses that arc similar to hotols iB that they proyide sleopiBg
aceommodatioRG, restamaRts, cocktail lounges, retail saops, aBd gHeJt services. Tae
primary diflCrence is that resort Botels cater to the tourist and '.'llcatioR Business, often
pro vi din;:; a variety ofrecreatioRal facilities, rather thaB eOBvontioB ana moetin;:; ElHsiBess.
Resort hotels are normally located in suburbnn or outlying locations on larger sites thaB
6onventional hoteb.
***
Restaurant (Jew !W'113:'er aualitv! shall mean a land use conslstmg of eating
establishments of high quality and with turnover rates usually of at least one hour or
longer. Generally, quality restaurants do not serve breakfast; some do not scn;e luncll" all
,
serve dinner. Often the restaurants in this land use are not a chain and reservations are
required.
Page (, of] 3
Underlined text is added; StnJl;:)( thr0tlgFi text is deleted
!i0iT1 f-.'O. :D
,/;Ojl: h " O. 2;:"i!~'J
j 7 cf '1 ~i::;
***
Shopping Center shall mean development consisting of eight or more retail businesses or
service establishments containing a minimum total of 20.000 square feet of floor area.
Some of the facilities included as part of a shopping center may include non-
merchandising facilities. such as movie theaters. restaurants. post offices. banks and
health elubs. Shopping centers. in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building.
often include outparcels. These buildinl1s are tynically drive-in banks. retail stores or
restaurants. A marina, hotel or motel with accessory retail shops is not considered a
shopping center.
***
Specialty retail shall mean small strip shopping centers that contain a variety of retail
shops and specialize in quality apparel; hard goods; and services such as real estate
offices, daHce studios, florists and small restaurants.
***
Square footage shall mean the gross area measured in feet from the exterior faces or
exterior walls or other exterior boundaries of the building including mezzanines,
corridors and lobbies within the principal outside faces of the exterior walls, not
including architectural setbacks or proiections. For the calculation of road impact fees,
square footage excludes areas within the interior of the building which are utilized for
parking.
***
Timeshare shall be considered under the definition of All.suites hotel for the purpose of
this chapter and the assessment of impact fees.
***
University/iunior college (private) shall mean four ycar aRd :;raduate edHcatioBal
instjt:jtions private two. year i unior, commwlity and teclmical colleges as well as private
four-year universities and private colleges that mayor may not offer graduate programs.
Vehicle miles of travel (VMT) shall mean the average new travel added to the road system
hy the development, computed by multiplying the new net trips generated by
development by the average trip length.
SECTION THREE. Article II, Impact Fees, Section 74-201, Imposition of impact fees, of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-201.
Imposition of impact fees
***
(g) Immokalee Enterprise Zone Deferral Area.
***
Page 7 of JJ
Underlined text is added; Stnld~ tlm-Jl:.lbA text is deleted
il?nl I'JCJ. !I'D
L':c:a<'~h 10. 20(;9
[:,:;88 '~8 'JI '\ 'i:3
(3) As used in this subsection, (g) of section 74.201, "qualifying development," means
an owner-occupied dwelling unit and its associated lot or land. "Sale" includes each and
evcry voluntary and/or involuntary sale of any part of thc fee title Lo any part of thc real
property that is subject to the respective deferred impact fccs (as dcscribed in the
agreement). "Transfer" includes each and every transfer, voluntary or involuntary
(including transfer by court order or order of any administrative agency or administrative
body, and including whether the transferee is a government or agency of a government,
excepting only the following: Transfer of fee title of the property from one original tenant
by the entireties to the other original tenant by the entireties; transfer of any part of the
fee title between (or among) the original joint tenants, or bet ween or among the original
tenants in common. "Refmancing" includes any extension of the payment term or any
increase in the amount financed, of any original mortgagees) or other financing document
that has as security for the payment obligation any fee title to the real property that is
subject to the deferred impact fees. "Original" rcfers to the parties to the relevant
document on the effective date of the applicable impact fee deferral agreement.
Notwithstanding anything in this subsection (g) of section 74-201, the directsr sf the
financial aamiRistratioR aRd housiHg departmcHt of community E1evelopmeffi and
eWiiroamental services E1ivisiea county manager may waive the triggering of the
obligation to pay deferred impact fees due to a sale, a transfer or refinancing if, in the
judgment of the ffireeteF county manager, the respective sale, transfer or refinancing is of
such a nature as not to justify that the deferred impact fees should become due and
payable because of the sale, transfer, or refinancing.
***
SECTION FOUR. Article II, Impact Fees, Section 74-202, Payment, of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-202.
Payment.
***
(h) In the event a building permit issued for a development: (i) expires prior to commencement
of any part of the development for which the building permit was issued, (ii) is officially
cancelled, (iii) is revised after payment of impact fees and the permit's revision results in a
reduction in the impact fees applicable for the development, or (iv) results in the impact fees
being overpaid due to an incorrect application of the rate schedule, calculation error(s), or prior
payment within the same subject property, the then current owner/applicant may, within four
years of payment the eJ:JliratioH of, caRccllation ef, oycrpaymGFlt for, or approyeEl revisioR to the
building permit, apply for a reimbursement of a portion of or the entire impact fee, depending on
the basis for the request for reimburscmcnt. All such requests for reimbursement shall be
calculated by applying the impact fee rate schedule that was in effect on the date of the
respective building permit application. Failure to make timely application for a reimbursement of
the impact fee shall waive any right to a reimbursement.
***
Page g of 13
~Ll]derlined text is added; ~tr\:lGL threti.;;h text is deleted
;;n>~ .;;:'if, ',-;, '_~
,C-'"
. '1 -,'';' J
: S' ::,\f ,-'
SECTION FIVE. Article II, Impact Fees, Section 74-203, Use offimJs, of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-203.
Use of funds.
(a) Thc board hereby establishes or reaffirms the establishment of separate impact fee trust
funds for each of the public facilities, designated as follows:
(J) Road: "Road Impact Fee Trust Fund";
(2) TV{der and seH'er: "\Vatcr Impact Fee and/or Se\ver Impact Fee Trust Funds": The
county hereby establishes or reaffimls the establishment of two separate trust funds, one
entitled "Water Impact Fce Trust Fund" for water and a second entitled "Sewer Impact
Fee Trust Fund" for sewer;
(3) Parks and recreational: The county hereby establishes or reaffirms the
establishment of two separate trust funds, one entitlcd "Regional Park Impact Fee Trust
Fund" (into which the portion of the impact fee allocated to parks and recreational
scrviccs paid by development located in municipalities within the county will be
deposited), and a second entitled "Unincorporated Park Impact Fee Trust Fund" (into
which the portion of the impact fee allocated to parks and recreational services paid by
development located in the unincorporated areas of the county will be deposited);
(4) LibrmJ'.' "Library Jmpact Fcc Trust Fund";
(5) Emergency medical: "Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Trust Fund";
(6) E-dNctltion&!: "Edllcationallmpact Fee Trust F~
(1 Q) C'orreclional: "Correctional Impact Fee Trust Fund";
(i> 7J Fire: "Fire Impact fee Trust Fund."
W.lD General governmcnt : "General Govemment Impact fee Trust fund."
(.J-(}.S!) Law Enforcemelll : "Law Enforccment Impact fee Trust Fund."
***
SECTION SIX. Article Ill, Special Reqlliremellts for Specific Types of Impact Fees, Section
74-302, Special requirements for road impacl fees. of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-302.
Special requirements for road impact fee.
***
(h) Payment of road impact fees to obtain a certificate of adequate public facilities.
(]) A five-vear temporary certificate of public facility adequacy (COAl shall be issued
concurrent with the approval of the next to occur final local development order. At the
time a temporary certificate of public facility adequacy is issued, twenty percent (20%) of
the estimale!Lpayment based on the impact fee rate in effect at the time of the pre-
approval letter will be due and deposited into the applicable impact fee trust fund. The
limds will then be immediately available tor appropriation by the Board of County
Commissioners for transportation capital improvements. final calculation of impact fees
Page 9 of 1 J
Underlined text is added; ~~ lex! is deleted
:tem f.!o. 17D
hi':ar:;h 1 0 ~~DU9
~o')r .'! 13
due will be based on the intensity of development actually permitted for construction and
the impact fee schedule in effect at the time of the building permit(s) application, such
that additional impact fees mav be due prior to issuance of the building pennit(s). The
balance of transportation impact fees shall be paid in four additional annual installments
of 20%, beginning one vear after the initial 20% payment.
(2) At the time a temporary COA is issued, and the first twenty percent (20%) of the
estimated paymcnt is paid, the applicant will deposit with the County sufficient security,
the form of which has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners, for a term
<;if four years, in an amount equal to the 20% pa'vment.
(3) Upon payment of 100% of the estimated impact fees, the certificate will be issued in
perpetuity and the dedicated security will be released. No further advance payments will
be due once actual road impact fees are paid equal to the initial estimated impact fees.
(4) Failure to submit payment in accordance with the provisions of this subsection shall
result in the following;
(i) Upon failure to cure following 10 days written demand, the County will
exercise its payment rights to the dedicated securitv: and
(ii) The matter will be referred to the Board of County Commissioners for review.
Absent the Board finding exceptional circumstances. the temporary certificate of
public facilitv adequacv shall be revoked.
(5) For those developments that have secured a three-year COA. in order to extend the
vesting period for an additional five years. the balance of the estimated transportation
impact fees. based on the impact fee rate in effect at the time of the P1'e-approval letter,
must be paid in five additional annual installments of 20% with the first payment being
made prior to the eXR.iration date of the three-year certificate. For those developments
that have secured a three-vear certificate that has expired, in order to extend the vesting
period for an additional five years, the balance of cstimated trallsportation impact fees
based on the impact fee rate in effect at the time of the pre-approval letter must be paid in
five additional annual installments of 20%. with the first payment being made within (30)
thirty days of the effective date of this Ordinance. At the time the first twenty percent
(20%) of the estimated payment is paid. the applicant will deposit with the County
sufficient securitv, the form of which has been approved by the Board of County
Commissioners, for a tern) of five years. in an amount equal to the 20% payment. Upon
payment of 100% of the balance of the estimated impact fees, the certificate will be
issued in perpetuity and the dedicated security will be released. No further advance
payments will be due once actual road impact fees arc paid equal to the balance of the
estimated transportation impact fees. Failure to submit payment in accordance with the
provisions of this subsection shall result in the following; (i) Upon failnre to cure
following 10 davs \vritten dema.""1d. the County will exercise its paYment rights to the
dedicated securitv: and (ii) The matter will be rcferred to the Board of Countv
Commissioners for review. Absent the Board findin~ exceptional circumstances, the
temporary certificate of public facility adequacy shall be revoked.
(6) Offsets for road impact fees assessed to building permits for imnact fees oaid in
accordance with this sllbsectio~as well as any r"!ll~ining balance of P'!Y!!!ents related to
Page 10 of 13
Underlined text is added; Suuel: tAfsfdgR text is deleted
i:-:;::rn r~o. i I'D
r,t3r_~:h 10, 2CCJ9
:21 ')f " '[~;
the original three-year certificate. will he applied equally to the new or remaining units or
sqllare footage and will run with the sllbiect land.
(7) This provision is to be read in coni unction with Section 10.02.07 of the Collier
COllnty Land Development Code. To the extent this {Jrovision conflicts with this or with
any other Collier COllnty ordinance. rule or regulation, the provisions of this section shall
control.
SECTION SEVEN. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier COllnty or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or lInconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, sllch portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions.
SECTION EIGHT. INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-
lettered and internal cross-references amended throughollt to accomplish sllch, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION NINE. EFFECTIVE DATE,
This Ordinance shall be effective June 8, 2009, subject to filing with the Florida
Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Conrmissioners of Collier
COllnty, Florida this _ day of
.2009.
ATTEST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
DONNA FIALA, Chairnlan
Ap
an
Page 11 of 13
Underlined text is added: ~d: tHrougH text is deleted
APPENDIX A
'tem t\io. 17D
f/clrch 10, 20e:]
22 of 113
SCHEDULE ONE: ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January I, 2008 JlIne 8. 2009
Residential
Single Family Detached HOllse
Less than 1,500 Sq. Ft.
(}.lima! HouGehela Iflcome ~ Po'.'e",; Ley.l)
Less thaR 1,500 Sq. Ft.
{/..nn1:lal Heuseneld Iaeame --: 50~~ efCollier
CSl::lBt)' Median .^.ruUla] Househeld IHGsmel
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
2,500 Sq. Fl. or larger
Multi Family (1 :1 Stories)
Multi Family (3 9 Stories)
MlIlti-Family (Apartments) 1-10 Stories
MlIlti-Family (Apartments) Above 10 Stories
Assisted Living Facility (ALF)
Condominium/Townhollse (1-2 Stories)
Mobile Home
Retirement Community
High-Rise Condominium (3+ Stories)
Lodging
Hotel
Motel
Resort Hotel
All SlIites Hotel
RV Park
Recreation
Golf Course
Movie Theaters
Marina
Dance Studios/Gymnastics
Rate
$3, 110. 1 9/cJwelliR; unit
$1,872.83/dweJlin;'''lffiit
$8,217.62 $7.652,OO/dwelling unit
$11,522.55 $1O,372.00/dwelling unit
$12,819.55 $1 U59.00/dwelling lInit
$8,051,3 7/cJwelliRg lIRit
$8,220.39/cJwelliHf; liRit
$7.464.00/dwelling unit
$4,784,OO/dwelling unit
$U47.00/dwelling unit
$7, 725.00/dwelling unit
$4,3l4.00/dwelling unit
$3. 754.00/dwelling 1I11it
$5.526.00/dwelling unit
$1,951.54
$ 1 ,032.11
$7,858.52
$5,381.80
$~,913.06
$5,188.90
$7,785.H $6,578.00 per room
$1,961.92 $4,222.00 per room
$6,817.03 per room
$3,891.00 per room
$1,280. J 0 $2.299.00 per site
$1,013,392.40 $749.894.00/ 18 holes
$51,978.53 $46.217.001 per screen
$1,613.26 $3,517.00/ boat berth
ll\,339.001 1.000 Sq. ft.
Institutional
Hospital
Nursing Home
Church
Private Elementary School
Private Middle School
Priyat" High School
Private University/Jr. College < 7,501 students
Page] 2 of 13
~l~,~l~.~l
$1,186.36
$10.101.53
$1,111.53
$l,51rJ81
$1.710.57
$2,926,03
Underlined text is added: StrHe!~ threlolgh text is deleted
$l 8,034.00/1 ,000 sq. ft.
$ 1.26 1. 00 per bed
$8.619.00/1,000 sq. ft.
$1.005.00 per student
$1,439.00 per student
$1.526.00 per student
$.+Jl!OO per stlldent
Private Universityl Jr. College> 7.500 students
Day Care
Office
Office 50,000 sq ft or less
Office 50,001-100,000 sq. ft. er-less
Office 100,001-200,000 sq. ft er-less
Office 200,001-400,000 sq. ft.eHess
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft
Medical Office
S20,074.97
$17,019.23
$11,113.56
S 12,206.07
$ll.05U3
$17,585,63
Retail
Specialty Retail
Retail 50,000 sq. ft. or less
Retail 50,00l-100,000 sq. ft,
Retail 100,001-150,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,00l-200,000 sq, ft.
Retail 200.001-400.000 sq. ft.
Retail 400.001-600,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,00l -I ,000,000 sq. ft.
Retail f,'Teater than l,OOO,OOO sq. ft.
Furniture Store
Pharmacy/Drug Store w/Drive- Thru
Home Improvement Superstore
Restaurant High TlIrnover
Reslaurant: Low Turnover (Ollalitv)
Restaurant: Drive-in
Gasoline/Service Station
Supermarket
QlIick LlIbe
Convenience Store (24 hours)
Convenience Store w/Gas PlImps
$28,517.11
S18,097.01
$17,117.81
W',186.17
$16,385.00
S15.195.65
SI6,187.16
S17,608,07
5"l,508,15
$17,260.18
$l7,111.15
$12,288.30
$58,188.61
$1"1,093.76
$9,791.05
$21.713.08
517,191.31
$116,656.07
$18,731.78
Services
Tire Store
NewfUsed AlIto Sales
Luxury Auto Sales
Bank/Savings: Walk-in
Bank/Savings: Drive-in
Self-Service Car Wash
Automated Car Wash
:m,015.23
533,637.70
5 J 7,920.65
$55,~81.90
5108,545m
513.976.08
Industrial aud Agricultural
General Light Industrial
Business Park IFJe,-su8cP)
-. '. - -- 1----)
M ini- Warehollse
$Jf,l*~
~lS,~55.~l
5: J ,770 11
Page 13 of]3
Un.d_erhneJ;! texl IS added; ~~ text is deleted
52,153.02
$1,232.15
;iC~!ri r'.io. i/J
. ':ar::-I FJ. 2:}:"}9
:':'3 ()f -: ':3
ll,,766.00 pcr student
51.445.00 per stlldent
516,763.00/1000 sq. ft.
514.257.00/1000 sq. ft.
S12.l15.00/1000 sq. ft.
SI0.296.00/1000 sq. ft.
$9.348.00/1000 sq. ft.
$40.51LOO/1000 sq. ft.
526.87700/1,000 sq. ft,
$19.823.00/1,000 sq. ft.
S20,041.001 1 ,000 sq. ft.
$ 1 8,661.00/1 ,000 sq. ft.
$17.88300/1,000 sq. ft.
516.893.00/1.000 sq. ft.
516.847.00/1,000 sq. ft.
S18.255 001 1,000 sq. ft.
$19,187.00/1.000 sq. ft.
$3.545.00/1.000 sq. ft.
S13.958.00/1,000 sq. ft.
59,901.00/1.000 sq. ft.
52.440.00/1,000 sq. ft. scat
Sl,553.00/1,000 sq, ft.-seat
S]37.444 001 1,000 sq. ft.
$8,22 l, 00 per fuel position
S26.570.00/l,000 sq. ft.
$14,522.00 per bay
597.636.00/1,000 sq. ft.
537,652.00 per fuel position
$10.930.00 per bay
$27.131.00/1,000 sq. ft
$14.996.00/1.000 sq. ft
$39.429.00/1,000 sq. ft.
$40,158.00/1.000 sq. ft.
$3,6.367.00 per bay
$39.066.00/ 1.000 SQ. ft.
$7.732.00/ l,OOO sq. ft.
SI4.02J.OO/l,000 sq. ft.
,$1.436.00/1,000 sq. ft.
Agenda item r~o.17D
Iviarch -: 0.2009
Page 24 of 1:3
ATTACHMENT "A"
Excerpt from Item lOA - February 10,2009
. Five year (Capital Improvement Element) CIE financial feasibility, revenue
projections and needs assessment.
The currently proposed CIE attached as (Exhibit "A" Proposed CIE) represents a
significw~t reduction in anticipated impact fee revenues from the recently adopted AUIR
attached as (Attachment "0" adopted AUIR). It represents a five year revenue reduction
of23 million dollars and a fiscal 09 reduction from an anticipated 35 million dollars to 25
million dollars. Several projects are proposed to be adjusted accordingly to match the
anticipated demand and fiscal rebalancing. Notably, Golden Gate Boulevard has been
moved to 2013 from 2012, Davis BOlllevard has been moved to 2010 from 2009, Collier
BOlllevard has been moved to 2010 from 2009. The proposed CIE is consistent with the
AUlR and prior BCC approval of a 50 million dollar commercial paper loan as a revenue
sOllrce. A further reduction in revenues and any corresponding changes to the schedllle of
capital projects within the CIE may require a re-submittal of the CIE to the Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) for approval. The proposed CIE represents a review of the
most recent revenue projections and construction estimates. Based on histOlical 2008
building activity, the CIE can be supported by the Impact Fee Stlldy with or without the
adoption of the Trip Length Stlldy. A rollback to the 2006 rate schedule as proposed by
the Productivity Committce would require approximately 5-6 million dollars annllally of
sllpplemental revenue to maintain the integrity of the ClEo
. What wOllld be the liscal impact to the general fund revenlles and
sllbsequently the taxpayers to supplement the CIE if the BCC shollld adopt
an alternative impact fee rate as proposed by the Productivity Committee?
Approximately 5-6 million dollars annually wOllld be reqllired from the General Fund to
balance the CIE. Based upon the projected decrease in taxable value going forward into
FY 10 (-13.9%), the incremental millage rate necessary to generate $1,000,000 in
property tax revenue is .0148 or $ l.48 per $100,000 of taxable value. The projected
county-wide taxable value for FY 10 based lIpon a 13.9% decrease is $67,775.060,418.
To generate 6 million dollars annually, it wOllld require .0888 mills and would impact the
following land val lies accordingly; Single family home with a taxable vallie of $400,000
would see an increase of approximatcly $35 annllally. 100.000 SF of retail would see an
increase of approximately $1,000 annllally and a property such as the Collier Regional
Hcalth Center would see an increasc of approximately $6.500 annually.
,L:.::;enca Item No. 170
~ fJiarch 10, 2009
Fage 25 of 113
. What is the status of the un-built residential units and commercial sqllare
footage that has paid the reqllired 50% initial impact fee and what would be
the fiscal impact associated with a potential change to the payment schedule?
As of 1/16/2009. there are approximately 6,434 residential units and 964,0 I I square feet
of commercial development which has paid 50% of their road impact fees. The remaining
balance due is approximately $61.288.772. Out of that total, 1,229 residential units and
340,554 sqllare feet of commercial has expired and is in jeopardy of losing their vested
status. That represents approximately $14,835.689 that is past due. The remaining
balance 5.205 residential units and 623,457 square fect of commercial are dlle through
l2/3l/20l1.
The County C1E is prepared with a five year horizon. Adjllsting the payment schedule of
the road impact fees to be evenly spaced with a five year schedllle wOllld maintain the
integrity of the program but may reqllire accessing the commercial paper early to meet
the schedule or wOllld require the rebalancing of the progranl to be more back ended to
meet the revenues. It shollld be noted that several of the dcvelopers have stated that they
may not be able to meet the second 50% payment even if it means losing their vesting.
. Condllct a rcview of our impact fees and collection processes with the
development community and discllss their concerns and solicit ideas.
Staff contacted several of thc rcpresenting attorncys. planning firms and devclopcrs. Staff
also attendcd a Leadership Collicr workshop and discllssed growth management and
impact fecs. While the consenslls was that the County should continue to look for
alternative funding sources, they all expressed that shifting the paymcnt schedule from
50% down and 50% within three years to five eqllal 20% percent payments wOllld be a
significant benefit to their fiscal planning model. Full payment would still be required at
blliJding pcrmit but a longer payment plan that would maintain their vested statlls and
improve their cash flow wOllld be extrcmely beneficial. Some form of surety wOllld be
needed within a one year rolling period to maintain financial stability if we are to extend
the payment process.
. A review of the concept of defelTing impact fees to building pcrmit in areas
that have adequate capacity.
Allowing developers to secllre vesting along a roadway that has adequate capacity
without paying impact fces at all until bllilding pen11it has several complications that
make this problematic. The clIrrent GMP review requiremcnt has a significance test of
2% on the first adjacent link beforc carrying the impact on thc next link, In the urban area
this would allow small projects to procecd but would inhibit medium to large projects.
The level of available capacity wOllld also bc a point of contention. This would
encourage established residential builders to vest largc plattcd subdivisions way in
advance of thcir anticipated demand in order to securc the capacity. Additionally. it
would complicate the fiscal management of impact fees. While the conccpt is possiblc,
l\oenda Item hlo. 1lD
" March 10, 2009
Page 26 of 113
the variables would reqllire a much more detailed analysis and vetting with the
development community and the BCC before it cOllld become effective.
Exceptionally high vacancy rates continlle to exacerbate the perception that roadway
capacity is available and that capital construction can be delayed or is not needed. It
should be noted that impact fee rate adjustments that differ from the December 2008
Study may have a negative revenue impact; and, therefore, a corresponding detrimental
impact to the County's Capital Improvement Element (CIE). Failure to maintain funding
for capacity improvements will cventllally revert to a back log environment expedenced
in the late 1990s. .Attached is the rate comparison sheet that provides the detailed
comparison by category for the current rate, the proposed rate with the Trip Length
Stlldy, the proposed rate withollt the Trip Length Study and the 2006 Rate recommended
by the Productivity Committee.
A,'Jenc!r:I Item hlJ. 17L)
~ rv'larch 10 2009
Page 27 of 113
Attachment "8"
Excerpt from Section 10.02.07 of the Collier County Land Development Code
10.02.07 Submittal Requircmcnts for Certificatcs of Public Facility Adequacy.
***
C. Certificate ofpuhlicfaciiity adequacy.
1. General.
a. A certificate of public facility adequacy (COA) shall be isslled concurrently with the
approval of the next to occur final local development order. At thc time a certificate of
public facility adequacy is isslIed, fifty percent of the estimated transportation impact fccs
must be paid into the applicable trust fllnd pllrsuant to 10.02.07 c.l.e.. and such funds
will be immediately available for appropriation to implement capital road facility
improvements, cxccpt that for those non-residential (i.e.. typically commercial or
industrial) developments otherwise rcquired to obtain approval of an SDP prior to the
issuance of a bllilding pem1it, applicants for a final subdivision plat may elect to:
i. comply with the applicable regulations of this section as to 1 or more of the lot(s) of
the FSP and obtain a COA specifically for jllst that lot or lots at a specified intensity of
development: or
ii. delay submitting a TIS and obtaining a COA for all ofthe proposed lots. or jllst those
remaining lots not thcn already complying with this section. lIntil a required SDP is
applied for and the terms of this section are then complied with inclllding payment of
estimated transportation impact fees.
The subject development is not allocated any available road systcm capacity or
considered eligible to be vested for transpOltation concUlTency purposes, however, until
approval of a TIS, payment of 50% estimated Transportation Impact Fees, and issuance
of a COA in accordance with Chapters 3, 6, and 10 of this Code and Rule 9J-5.0055,
F.A.C.
Impact fees for all other Category "A" capital improvements will be paid at the time of
issllance of building pen11its at the rate then cUlTently applicable.
b. Annual Traffic/PUD Monitoring RCpOlt. After February 6. 2003, the effective date of
this section's amcndmcnt, all PUDs which arc less than I DO percent "built-ollt". must
annllally submit a report detailing thcir progress toward bllild-ollt of the development.
The traflic rcport mllst be submitted as part of the annual PUD monitoring report on or
before the anniversary date of the PUD's approval by the Board per LDC section
10.02.l3.F. The written repOlt mllst be submiued to. and be in. a f0l111at established by
the County Manager, or designee. lInless paymcnt-in-lieu is provided pursuant to section
I 0.02.13.F., and mllst indicate any revised estimatcs to the initial build-ollt schedule and
any reslllling effect on traf1ic impact projections, along with any progress towards
completing any developcr contribution requirements. Traftic/PUD Monitoring RepOlts
which are more than 90 days past dlle will result in the suspension of final local
Aaenda Item No. ~17D
~ March 10, 2009
Page 28 of 113
development order issllance for the PUD pending receipt of the Report. The county
manager or designee may waive the traffic counts for the annual monitoring period for
the entire PUD or p0l1ions of the PUD when the remaining lIn-built approved density or
intensity produces less than 25 PM peak trips. The PUD owner(s) "the Developer, Home
Owners Association, Master Association or similar entity" may petition the Board of
COllnty Commissioners to relinquish the development rights to any un-built units and
declare themselves "built-out" in order to satisfy all reporting reqllirements. The applicant
for a waiver or determination of "bllilt-ollt" status shall be responsible for any
documentation required in order to verify the status of the PUD. The traffic reporting
reqllirements are the responsibility of the entity that retains the remaining development
rights to any un-bllilt lInits or intensity.
c. Where the proposed development has been isslled final sllbdivision plat approval or
final site development plan approval prior to the effective date of this section, i.e., on or
abollt November 3, 1993, a certificate of public facility adeqllacy shall be obtained prior
to approval of the next development order required for the proposed development.
d. Estimated transportation impact fees for a development shall be paid into the
applicable impact fee trust fund in the amount estimated to be dlle upon issuance of the
final local development order(s) for the development lIpon or prior to issuance of a
celtificate of public facility adequacy for the development.
Developments that have paid estimated impact fees for all Category "A" facilities prior to
February 6,2003, and which elect to come lInder the provisions of this section may make
payment of estimated impact fees into the applicable transportation impact fee trust fund
such that previously paid estimates may be applied as a credit towards the impact fees
calculated and dlle as a prerequisite to the issuance of the final local development order(s)
for the development. If the developer does not elect to come under the provisions of this
division, impact fees paid into the impact fee escrow trust fund prior to February 6, 2003,
shall be refundable lIpon written reqllest to the County Manager or designee accompanied
by the sunender of the Oliginal certificate of pllblic facility adequacy obtained prior to
issuance of final local development order(s) for the development. Fees paid into
applicable impact fee trust accounts as a prerequisite to the issuance of final local
development order(s) prior to February 6. 2003, in accordance with the applicable
consolidated impact fee regulations in Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances
shall be refundable pursllant to the provisions of such rcglllations lIpon written request to
the Finance Director, Clerk of Courts.
e. Assessment and application of transportation impact fees and slIrrender of certificate
of public facility adequacy. Within 90 days of written notification by facsimile or other
approved electronic format that an application for a final local development order has
been approved and a celtificate issued, or prior to expiration of the temporary, I-year
capacity reservation previously secured by the applicant lIpon the COllnty's acceptance of
the TIS pursuant to section 10.02.07 CA.f., provided said capacity reseryation has more
than 90 days rcmaining, whichever of the 2 occllrs later, an applicant may pick lip the
certificate lIpon payment of 1/2 (50 percent) of the estimated transportation impact fees
due. Such estimates shall be based on the currently approved transportation impact fee
rate schedule. If thc certificate is not picked up within the timeline set forth above and the
Agencia Item ~~CJ. 170
L!;arch 10.20:19
Page 29 of 1 ' 3
applicable estimated transportation impact fees paid, the application will be deemed
denied and the applicant mllst reenter thc application process from the beginning,
Transportation impact fees for residential devclopment will be estimated using the fee
based on the mid-range hOllsing size, unless the residential lIse qualifies as affordable
housing. Affordable housing estimated transportation impact fees shall be based on the
income limitations for affordable hOllsing in force at the time of a certificate of public
facility adequacy application. Additionally, previollsly vested developments may,
pursuant to section 10.02.07 c.1. elect to have escrowed fees applied against the 1/2 (50
percent) of estimated transportation il11pact fees. Payment of these fees vests the
development entitlements for which the certificate of public facility adequacy certificate
applies on a continllolls basis unlcss relinqllished pursuant to the requirements of this
section prior to the end of the third year after the initial impact fee payment. The initial
50 percent impact fee payment is non-refundable aftcr payment and receipt of the
certificate of public facility adequacy certificate.
Not later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the 3 year period for such certificates, the
cOllnty shall notify the certificate holder via rcgistered mail of the remaining balance due
for the estimated transportation impact fees lip to 50 percent, based on level of building
permits already issued. The balance of the impact fces due will be calculated at the rate
schedllle thcn cllrrently applicable. The developer may elect to pay the balance of the
estimated transportation impact fees for the entitlements for which the certificate applies
or modify the certificate to a lcsser entitlement and calclllate the balance of the
transportation impact fees on the rcvised entitlements. The certificate of public facility
adequacy shall be modified to inclllde only the entitlements for which the estimated
transportation impact fees are paid. The expiration date for the remaining. up to 50
percent, balance of the estimated transportation impact fees due from a previollsly vested
development that opts into the revised concurrency celtificate process as provided in
section 10.02.07 c.1. of this Code. will relate back to the date of issuance of the original
celtificates. Once the balance of the estimated transpOltation impact fees are paid, those
estimated fees are non-refundable. Howcver, the certificate of public facility adequacy
runs continuollsly with the land in perpetuity after all estimated transpOliation impact fees
have been paid. As bllilding permits are drawn down on the entitlements, the estimated
transportation impact fees already paid shall be dcbitcd at the rate of the impact fees in
effect at the time of utilization. If the cstimatcd transportation impact fee account
becomes depleted, thc developer shall pay the cllJTcntly applicable transportation impact
fee for each building pen11it in full prior to its issuance. In the event that lIpon bllild-ollt
of the development estimated transportation impact fees are still unspent, the remaining
balance of such estimated fees may be transferred to another approved project within the
same, or adjacent, transportation impact fee district, provided any vested entitlements
associated with the unspcnt and transferred transportation impact fees are relinqllished
and the certificate of public facility adeqllacy is modified to delete those entitlements.
2. RlIles of general applicability for ccrtificate of public facility adequacy. Certificatcs
of public adequacy issued for roads lInder section 10.02.07 c.1. of this Code sllbseqllent
to the [effcctive date of this section's amendment] will run in perpetuity provided
provisions of subsection 10.02.07 C.l.e. of this Code are met and that annllal mid-year
,Agenda item No. 17D
March 10. 2009
Page 30 of 113
monitoring reports are filed which comply with section 10.02.07 C1. of this Code and all
developer requirements established during zoning or as part of a developer contriblltion
agreement are completed or are being constructed consistent with the cllrrent
development infrastructure improvement construction cOllUllitment schedule.
a. Timing. An application for a certificate of pllblic facilily adequacy may only be
submitted as part of an application for a final local development order slIbject to section
10.02.07 Cl. of this Code.
b. Impact Fees. A complete application for a certificate of public facility adeqllacy will
include L~e calculation of the total amount of transportation hnpact fees estimated to be
dlle by the applicant on the development for which a final local development order
application has been submitted. Impact fee calculations will be reviewed and the amount
estimated to be paid pursllant to section 10.02.07 Cl.e. of this Code finally determined
by the impact fee coordinator. One-half (50 percent) of the estimated payment will be due
at the time of notification of approval of the final local development order and will be
deposited into the applicable impact fee trust fund and will be immediately available for
appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners for transportation capital
improvements. Final calculation of impact fees dlle will be based on the intensity of
development actually permitted for construction and the impact fee schedule in effect at
the time of the issllance of bllilding permit(s); such that additional impact fees may be
due prior to issuance of the building pemlit(s). The balance of transportation impact fees
shall be dlle as provided for in section 10.02.07 C1 of this Code.
c. Consolidated application. A final local development order shall receive final
approval only to the extent to which the proposed development receives a certificate of
public facility adeqllacy. The application for a certificate of public facility adeqllacy may
only be submitted with an application for final local development order approval, where
appropriate under this section. An application for a certificate of public facility adeqllacy
will receive final approval and a certificate will be issued concurrently with approval of a
final local development order as set forth in scction 10.02.07 Cl.e. of this Code.
d. Assignability and transferability. An approved certificate of Pllblic facility adequacy
shall run with the land associated with the corresponding development approval, and
shall be assignable within the corresponding land of the approved development, and shall
not be assignable or transferable to othcr development. except as may otherwise be
provided for under an approved development agreement. This provision does not
preclude the re-allocation of capacity between lots or parcels comprising the land that is
the subject of the same consolidated application for development approval so long as the
original celiiticate is surrendered along with a written request to re-allocate no more than
that certificate's previously approved capacity in a re-issued certificate.
e. Expiration. A certificate of public facility adeqllacy for "Category A" facilities,
except roads, shall expire 3 years from the date of its approval except to the extent that
bllilding permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the certificate
is approved or a final sllbdivision plat has been approved and recorded, and the proposed
development is then completed pursuant to the terms of the Collier COllnty Building
Code or as provided in section 10.02.07 Cl. of this Code, refund of impact fees, except
for certificates issued pllrsuant to section 10.02.07 C!. of this Code, will be subject to the
L\oenda :tem No.17D
'-' rv~arch 10, 2009
31 ot 1 ~ 3
provisions of the consolidated impact fee trust fund ordinance. The expiration date of a
re-issued certificate re-allocating capacity to different lots or parcels in the same
development will relate back to, and be calculated from, the original certificate's date of
Issuance.
i. For large developments as indicated below, a 5 year certificate of Pllblic facility
adequacy for "Category A" facilities, except roads, may be obtained provided the
developer enters into an enforceable development agreement with the cOllnty.
Developments comprised of more than 500 residential dwelling units, or a phased
increment of development comprised of n10re than 150 residential dwelling units, or a
commercial/industrial development of more than 100.000 sqllare feet of gross leasable
area is considered to be a large development. A certificate ofpllblic facility adequacy for
a large development shall expire 5 years from the date of its approval except to the extent
that building permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the
certificate is approved. and the proposed development is then completed pursllant to the
terms of the Collier COllnty Building Code.
( Effect. Issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy shall demonstrate proof of
adeqllate public facilities to serve the development approved in the development ordcr,
sllbject to the conditions in the development order. A slIbseqllent application for
development approval for developmcnt approved in a development order for which a
celtificate of public facility adeqllacy has been approved shall bc determined to have
adequate public facilities as long as the celtificate of public facility adequacy is valid and
unexpired. Whcn a certificate of public facility adeqllacy expires. any subseqllent
application for development approval shall require a new celtificate of public facility
adequacy to be issued pursllant to the tenns of this section prior to approval of any
subsequent development order for thc proposed development. Application for approval of
a certificate of Pllblic facility adequacy for subsequent or continuing development once a
certificate has expired shall be based on pllblic facility availability at the time of the new
application. Under no circllmstances shall a certificate of public facility adeqllacy be
automatically renewed.
3. Effect of development agreement in conjunction with a celtificate of Pllblic facility
adequacy. Upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners, any applicant shall
enter into an enforceable development agreement with Collier County pursuant to the
provisions of F.S. SS 163.3220--163.3242 or other agreemcnt acceptable to the Board of
County Commissioncrs. in conjunction with the approval of a development order and/or a
certificate of public facility adeqllacy. The effect of the development agreement shall be
to bind the palties pllrsuant to the tenllS and conditions of the developmcnt agreement
and the certificate of Pllblic facility adequacy in ordcr to insure that adeqllate public
facilities are available to serve the proposed developmcnt concurrent with when the
impacts of the development occur on the public facilities.
4. Procedure for review of application.
a. Submissio/l of al'piicaliol1S a/ld f"cs. The application for a certificate of public
facility adequacy for road facilities only shall be slIbmitted in duplicate to thc
Commllnity Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator. Such
applications shall be submitted at the tiling for the next final local dcvelopment order as
Aoenda item hlo. 170
~ I,larch 10, 2009
PO'd8 32 of "11 3
specifically provided for under section 10.02.07 C.I. All other applications for a
certificate (i.e., except for road facilities) shall be submitted at bllilding permit along with
final payment for any impact fees owed, inclllding any road impact fees. Application fees
in an amount to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners shall accompany
and be part of the applications.
b. Application contents. The form and contents for the application for public facility
adequacy, except for the road component, shall be established by the Community
Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator. In all cases, the
apphcant shall provide a facsimile number at which commur.ications and notifications
from the county to the applicant may be sent. The form and contents for the application
for public facility adequacy for the roadway component shall be established by the
Transportation Services Division Administrator. Complete applications in their entirety
are necessary to allow proper and adeqllate review by both the Commllnity Development
and Environmental Services Division and the Transportation Services Division. The form
and contents for applications shall be Pllblished and made available to the general public.
c. Determination of completeness and review. Upon receipt of an application for
certificate of public facility adequacy by the Community Development and
Environmental Services Division for road facilities, all copies of the application will be
time and date stamped. One copy will be forwarded to the Transportation Services
Division for processing no later than the next bllsiness day. After receipt of the
application for certificate of pllblic facility adeqllacy, the County Manager, or designee,
and Transportation Services Division Administrator, or designee, shall determine whether
its respective application is complete within 5 bllsiness days. If it is detenllined that any
component of the application is not complete. written notice via facsimile or other
approved electronic format shall be provided to the applicant specifying the deficiencies.
The County Manager, or designee, and Transportation Services Division Administrator,
or designee, shall take no fllrlher action on the application unless the deficiencies are
remedied. The applicant shall provide the additional information within 60 days or the
application will be considered withdrawn and the application fee is forfeited. After any
application for a certificate, except for road facilities, is received and determined to be
complete, the County Manager, or designee, shall review and grant, or deny each public
facility component except for roads in the application pursuant to the standards
established in section 10.02.07 C.5. of this Code. The Transportation Services Division
Administrator. or designee, shall review the related traffic impact statement and, if there
are no outstanding transportation-related isslles associated with the applicable
development order application, grant or deny a 1-year traffic capacity reservation for
roads pllrsuant to subsection 10.02.07 C.4.f. within the then effective submittal review
time frame set forth by the COllnty Manager, or designee. At the Transportation Services
Division Administrator's or designee's discretion, based lIpon their professional judgment.
granting of said traffic capacity reservation may be withheld beyond the aforementioned
time frame as long as there are olltstanding transportation-related issues associated with
the applicable development order application until after receipt and review of re-
submittal(s) that remedy all of said outstanding transportation-related isslIes. If the
Transportation Services Division Administrator, or designee, detenllines that the
/\,;jcTlda tem t'JO. 17D
!',,1 rch 10 2003
P ge 33 of 113
applicable development order application can be approved with stipulations related to
olltstanding transportation-related isslles. they shall grant the said 1 -year traffic capacity
reservation for roads within the aforementioned sllbmittal review time frame, or at the
earliest opportllnity thereafter. The traffic capacity reservation will be granted dllring, and
as part of, the applicable development order review and decision making procedures set
forth in this chapter. subject to a final concurrency determination, issuance of a COA and
approval of the final development order.
d. Appeal of public facilities determination. Within 30 days after issuance of the
determination of the Commu.~ity Development and Environmental Services Division
Administrator and/or the Transportation Services Division Administrator on the
application for a certificate of public facility adequacy, the applicant may appeal the
determination of to the Collicr County Board of COllnty COl1Ullissioners. A fee for the
application and processing on an appeal shall be established at a rate set by the Board of
COllnty Commissioners from time to time and shall be charged to and paid by the
applicant for a third party evaluation. The third party shall be an outside consultant who
has been previously approved by the County for the purpose of providing independent
review and recommendations on public facility adequacy detenllinations. The Board of
COllnty Commissioners shall hold a hearing on the appeal and shall consider the
determination of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Administrator and the Transportation Services Division Administrator, independent third
p3lty testimony and public testimony in light of all the criteria set forth in section
1O.02.07C.5. The Board of County Commissioners shall adopt the Community
Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the
Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination on the application for a
certificate of public facility adequacy with or without modifications or conditions, or
reject the Commllnity Development and Environmental Services Division
Administrator's and the Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination.
The Board of County Commissioncrs shall not be allthorized to modifY or reject the
Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the
Transportation Services Division Administrator's detenllination unless the Board of
COllnty Commissioners finds that the detenllination is not supported by sllbstantial
competent evidence or that the Commllnity Development and Environmental Services
Division Administrator's and the Transportation Seryices Division Administrator's
determination is contrary to the criteria established in section 10.02.07C.5. of this Code.
The decision of the Board of COllnty Commissioners shall inclllde findings of fact for
each of the criteria.
e. Approval of ccrtificatc; payment fiJI', and cancellation of certificates. Upon
notification by facsimile by the Community Development and Environmental Services
Division Administrator or his designee and the Transportation Services Division
Administrator or his designee. that an application for a certificate of public facility
adcqllacy for road facilities has been approved, 1/2 (50 percent) of the estimated
transportation impact fees shall be paid. If the applicant does not pick lip the certificate
and pay all applicable transportation impact fees within 90 days of notification by
facsimile, the certificate will be voided. In such a case, the applicant shall then be
Agenda Item hJo. 170
MarchiO. 2009
Page 34 of 113
required to apply for isslIance of a new certificate. All Collier County impact fees are due
and payable at building penllit isslIance based on the applicable rate structllre at that
time.
***
,!.\genc;a itern 1\10. 170
r'J1arch 10, 2C'C9
Pa;19 35 of 113
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
FINAL REPORT
C1l1_"; C
February 19,2009
Prepared for:
Collier County Transportation Planning Department
2885 S. Horseshoe Drh'e
Nllp/es. FL 34104
PrC'fwred b)":
Tindale-Oliver & Assuciales, inc.
JOOO N Ashley Dr" #100
1'"1111'", Haridll, 3360]
1}11 (813) 224-fl862.f(:lX (813) 226-2/06
/\genda Item No. i7D
March 10. 2009
Page 36 of 113
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
Table of Contents
Il\TRODU CTlON .........................................................................................,.......... 1
DEMAND COMPONENT ...................................................................................... 2
Interstate and Toll Facility Discounl Factor .................................................. 9
COST COMPONENT ............................................................................................. 9
County Costs..........................................................,..,........,...... ,..,................ 10
State Costs.............. .................................................... ........ ...... ...... '" ... ..... ..... 12
Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) ....................'..'......................... 15
Capacity Added per Lane Mile ............................'......................................... ] 5
Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added..................................................... 16
CREDIT COMPONENT.....................,....,.............................................................. 17
Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit..................................................................... 17
Ad Valorem Credit......................................................................................... 19
Present Worth Variables ................................................................................ 20
FlIel Effi ciency........................,............................................................,......... 20
Effective Days per year................................................................................. 21
CALCULATED TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE................ 21
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE COMPARISO:'ll................ 23
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Demand Component Calculation
Appendix B - Cost Component Calculation
Appendix C - Crcdil Component Calculation
Appendix D - Ad Valorem Credit
Appendix E - Single Family Ticring Analysis
Appendix F - Calculated Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Schedllle
Tindale-Oliver & /".ssociates, Inc.
February 1009
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item ~~o. 170
March 1 D. 2009
?age 37 of 113
COLLIER COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
Introduction
Collier County's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance was originally adopted in January
19R5. to assist Ihe County in providing adequate transportation facilities for expected
S'fowth. Section 74-335(a) of the current ordinance requires the fee to be reviewed and, if
appropriate, updated every three years.' As part of this process, Tindale-Oliver &
Associates, Inc. (TOA) has been retained to conduCl the 2008 transportation impact fee
update study.
Following the introduction, this report consists oftbe following sections:
. Demand Component
. Cost Component
. Credit Component
. Calclllated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
. Transportation lmpact Fee Schedule Comparison
The methodology lIsed for the transpOltalion impact fee study follows a standards-driven
approach. In the standards-dtiven approacb, also known as a consumption-based impact
fee, new development is charged based upon the proportion of the vehicle miles of travel,
that each unit of new development is expected 10 consume of a lane mile of roau\\'ay
network.
Included in this docllment is the necessary SUPPOlt matelial utilized in the calculation of the
transportation impact fees. The gencral equation used to compute the impact fee for a
given land use is:
[Demand x Cost] - Credit = Fee
The demand for travel placed on thc transportation system is expressed in units of vehicle
miles of travel (daily trip generation rate times the trip lenS1h times the percent new trips
(of total trips)) for each land use contained in the impact fee schedule. It shollld be noted
that trip generation is expressed in average daily rates since new development consumes
1 Source: Collier COllllty Code afOrdinanccs, Chapter 74, Section 74-335(u), ""Review Requirement'"
Tinda!e-Oliver & A.~:~:ociates_ Inc.
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
February 2009
l\genda itern No. i 7D
March 10, 2009
Page 38 of 113
trips on a daily basis. The cost of building new capacity is typically expressed in units of
dollars per vehicle mile or lane mile of roadway capacity. The credit is an estimate of the
future non-impact fee revenues generated by new development that are allocated to
roadway capacity expansion conslruction projects. ThllS, the impact fee is an "lip front"
payment for a portion of the cost of building a lane mile of capacity directly related to the
amount of capacity consumed by each lInit of land use conlained in the impact fee schedule
thaI is not paid for by future tax revenlles generated by the development.
It should be noted that the information lIsed to develop the impact fee schedllle was based
upon the most recent, reliable and localized data available.
There are 10 input variables used in the fee eqllation:
Demand Variables:
. Trip generation rate
. Trip length
. Percent new trips
. Interstate and toll facility discount factor
Cost Variables:
. Cost per lane mile
. Capacity added per lane mile
Credit Variables:
. Equivalent gas tax credit (pennies)
. Present Worth
. Fuel efficiency
. Effective days per year
A review of these variables and cOlTesponding recommendations are presented in the
following sections.
Demand Component
The amount of road system consumed by a unit of new land development is calculated
lIsing the following variables and is a measure of the vehicle miles of new travel a unit of
development places on the existing roadway system:
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
February 2009
2
Co!!ier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
Ac;.::;;nda itSnl r,,)J 17D
~ fl-'1arch 10, '2009
Page ~:;9 of "113
. Number of daily trips generated:
. Length of those trips; and
. Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already traveling on
the road system.
As part of this update, the trip characteristic variables are obtained primmily from two
sources: (I) similar stlldies previously conducted throughollt Florida and in Collier
COllnty (Florida Studies Database). and (2) the Institute of Transportation Engineers'
(lTE) Trip Generation reference report (7''' and gO, editions).
The Florida Trip Characteristics Studies Database is included in Appendix A. This
database was used to detennine vehicle miles of travel which is developed from trip len!,'1h,
percent new trips, and trip rate for most land uses. In addition, trip generation data from
the lIE th and 8th edition reports are used. In all instances where trip generation rate data
was available from both the ITE reference report and the Florida Studies database, a blend
calculation was used to increase sample size.
Residential
TOA updated Ihe trip generation rate and tlip length for some residential land uses where
additional data has been obtained since the last update study. Table 1 presents a sllmmary
of thcsc changes. These updates are consistent with recent impact fee statutes that require
the "most recent and localized data" be used.
IVon-Residential
As part of the 200g update study. TOA updated the retail (lTE LUC 820) trip length
and percent new trips curves. The trip length and percent ne\v trips curves use data
from Florida Studies Databascland lTE to dcvclop a rc!,"'ession equation that
predicts trip lengths for each tier. For Ihe lIpdate. 14 Florida studies were added to
the trip length regression analysis (to thc existing II studies) and 40 studies (9 li'OIn
rIorida and 31 nationwide studies) were added to the pcrcent new trips regression
analysis (to the existing 82 studies). The updated percent new tlips and trip length
curves with this additional data resulted in an average increase in VMT of 27 percent
for all tiers.
In addition to changes in the retail (LUC 820) trip lengths and percent nc\v trips,
demand data (TGR, TL, and PNT) for other land lISCS \Vcre updated based 011
additional data included in the Florida Studies Datahasc since the 2006 Stlldy. Table
] presents the percent changes in VMT (TGR. TL and PNT) tl1r each land use where
Tindale-Oliver & ASS0ciate~:. Inc,
February 2009
3
Collier County
Transp011alion Impact Fee Update Study
AGenda Hem r\lo, i 70
" 1\"1arch 1 O. 2009
Page 40 of 113
the demand componenl was updated. Note that only the land uses that are inclllded
in the adopted impact fee schedule are shown. Appendix A provides additional
detail for Ihe demand component calculations for each land use.
Tindale~Oliver & Associates, Inc.
February 2009
4
Collier County
TranSpoltation Impact Fee Update Study
o JJ ('1
,,-"'-
-"'-
N~
ci - 0
zo_
--..,.
c...c ID
.92 ;:' en
-rom
ro '5 Q.
",-
c
Q)
'"
<(
t/l
Q)
';:
0
OJ
Q)
-
ra
()
Q)
Q)
u..
-
u
ra
a.
E
"tl
Q)
.... -
Q) U
Q)
..cQ')
ral/)
I- ....
0
-
t/l
Q)
OJ
C
ra
J:
U
I-
:E
>
-
C
Q)
U
....
Q)
Il.
.-:i '0 ~
;; " '0 "
.. "'
" '0 ~. " ~ " c .g a -;;
'^ ~ "
; "' 0 ; " c ~
" ] =0 ] ,e .g 'i3 .g
.g :.0 .~ - "0
0 N ...J :.0 '" 'i3
~ ~ E: '5 V5 u 'i3 c- o f- OJ . OJ .g
w :c ~ :CJ :c '"
i'i i'i 5 0: .. ...J " ~ '" '"
N '" '" '-; '::ij 5
" v v . " w 0 w ~
~ ~ ~ OJ :oJ :.u ~ " e ] !::
f- e
'~ .;;; ';;: - 0 0 0 ;; -B .5 .s
" " v .s 0 .s ~ '0 .s
" "
:0 :c z " "0 , ;; '0 '0 3
" " " ~ '''S 3 .. '5
'5 0 - =0 0 ^ - .~ "
.. "' u i'i ^ u 'on " 0
= , ;; i:; - V} '0
Cf:.. ~ N ';Ji 0 N 1 .s ~
.~ '" '0
>. >, ...J ~-!(
;; 0 ~ v ~ 0 ~ ,0
;; :@ 0"- ~ 0' - 0' ~. ; x .~
= ,.. '0 '0 " ~. f- '-; '" M
= - ...J - .1 g' " g' >.
Q. if; if; if; ~! >. 2 ::>-, V >. 5 .0 "
" V V v .0 . .0 " ^ 3 .0 0 ~ ~.
- - - v ~ ':j 0 v 0
'" " '0 .:S 0; '0 tl '^
" " ;::: " " 0 1) i1 0 -= ~
, :0 :0 "
~ E E :c .s :0 0 ~ v " 2 0
9 " -;; 3 " c 3 ,5 '"
g 3 ~ <= - ,~ 0
- - - - ~ v v ::; v -;;
v v v " - v - - 'i3 if; c c
0 0 0 0 ...J 5 c ...J ~ V '0 ,- '0 Z V
'0 '0 '0 '0 "0 f- 0 - 0 ~
0 0 0 - '0 0 f- 0' 0' f- ~
0' ;-:: - 0 0' g 0 N '0 " 0
'" ~. ~. .,. 0 - ~ 0' - ~ - ,oj :; - " "'
>. - >, ~. >, >, , c >. , 0
E >-, >. - - "'
.0 .0 .0 -? .0 "0 ] .0 " .0 '0 ~ .0 '0 0
'0 "0 "0 '0 ", >. '0 "' >, '0 5' '0 ^ '0 " ]
';j :j ~ ~ ,~ .0 9j; .:::! .0 " ~. 0 c 0 v
"' 3 'i3 "' '5
0 " '0 " 0 '0 U " " " "' '"
v j.J v v ::: v 0 :0 ~ u ~ v 0 0 v 0
- g ~ " .:f; .:J " ;; p " 'i3 " v: :.0 " Vi
~ .g v 0 Jj .= v
g '0 '" " '0 '" '0 '"
,"2 0 "2 " '0 "
'" '" ~ '" - '" ,- '" 0' '" ~ .~ '0
~ '" 5
~ ~ '~ ~ - - v - - ~ >. v - :-- 'z
- - f- - f- - " .0 f- "- - f- 0: v
-
~
.. ~
= p
= ~ 0 ,- 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,- ,0
0 0 0' 0 ~
.c ~ :;: v. v-. - ;. v. '9 ~.
V S2. ;;. - - - - - .,. ~,
~
.
~""
'c .s 0 0 0 0 .s .s 0 0
;;l, '0 '0 " -:s '0 '0
.,
" =0 v
.:::! - '0
';j ,2 '0
7, ~ "' v
:5 0 .'g
=0
I - " 0;
- ~ - v
::; '" .f'
- t: " "
~ ~, 'D
~ ;; < .~
;;l "
~ ~ ~ - .~' u..
'" "3 - v
=
= 5 "
...J .:.i 0 - " 0- 0- i ;,' '~
Cl '1": -
:s - =0 .,; ~L <: ~ ci: g
2:. =0 '" - . ~ U ...::' ~
''0 '" - ..:::' ~ ,:.)
f- .,. v 0
z - ~; . u ^ ~
:i: " "
'" I~ "' .. .. "
Q ') :=: I , ", " C2 v I I
Vi ]! ,- .: '0 ~ ~ c;:
'C = .:; .2:L
'" '^ ~ Vi 0 0 ~ " ..J
" v N ;;: 2 ::; :E ~
if; ..J ~ if; <
'" V =0 N e, '" ~, '" - ~.
t: ;;l - e, ...r: 'r, ~.
...J co e, co ~, e, ~, ~, N
;.,
>,'"
- 0
5 V3
8~
'"
.~ "R
o::J
U ~
u..
v
'"
J
.2
~
'5
'"
~
.~
-
""
12
i-
i~
I.~
v
o
"
.<
"<I
v 0'0,
.::: g
-N
9 "..
~ ~
'" 0
~13
.:::: u
:--<~
OOJ0':l
r-,-O-
.-~~::
,0
~N
""'
:::J::: CD
~r::0l
-roro
~~o..
c
"
:oJ
<(
In
Q)
0;:
o
0)
Q)
-
I1l
(,)
Q)
Q)
ll.
-
o
I1l
_0-
"C E
Q)
::::l"C
.:: Q)
--
c: 0
o Q)
0-
~Q)
.-~
Q) 0
-....
.0 In
I1l Q)
1-0)
c:
I1l
J:
(,)
I-
:2:
>
-
c:
Q)
CJ
....
Q)
a.
....l v
f-o " 0 "" ~ I
V ~
" '3 <t: N -B f-o " , "
f-o '0
Q '0 Q U Z Z ~ c @
. ~ ~ ~ ;:) ~
S "- "- ~
.. W " 0 ~ ....l '0 C .g
...... 0. ~ ~ OJ ~ V ~ " C .g
S ~ -'"
a ~ , ....l '0 '~ .;; '0
<> ] ~ 0. ~ ~ >> >, Q '5 OJ
~ '0 ~ 0 Q ?t. ~ ~ :0 OJ
0 Q 0 1i :: ~
.' Q ~ '" '0 .. @ a ~:: it:
. . 1i ~ 0 ~ "- >> it:
~ .D .;!Z ~ ~ ~ .D ci 0 .~ OJ
.... e .5 s 1i OJ -
>> ] .s '0 '~ 0 " t: -
u ~ Q V '0 ~ , u .s
,. c ~ ~ ~ e " w E .5
. ~ ~ .3 ~ &; ~
0- ,- '0 e " on 1i
.... .... . ~ U Q . '3 w " 0 'J.. . ! '-
u "" V 1i ?t. u '0 ~ '0 ~ '0 ~ ~ 0
u " V , CJ ~ a 0 ~
0 - '0 '0 '"" '0 ~ OJ
0 ~ N "- - t: 0 t: ~ - .;!Z '~
Q 0 f-o 0 '3 " N >,
........ 0 5 " >, ~
on a U .D Z OJ '0 C '0 ~ "
'.' > 0 -T ;:) - @ "- ....l @ ~ 0 ~ " c
~ '0
'. N ....l >> S ~ 0. ~ 0 ~ 0 ....l C 0
" > .D " ~ 0 C/O 0 C/O 0 iF
" ~ U " '0 " ~ ~ 0 Q ~, ~ iF
Q ;:) ~ 0 ....l ~ 0 .
, Q " U ~ ~
( -S ....l " ~ '0 .~ ~ ~ 0. 0 Q ~
~ ~ 1i Q .s ~ " ~ ~ OJ
.'. " ~ 0 0 ~ OJ
u 0 '0 :0 .:S -S :0
u " "- G ....l V " .s :0
. '" , 0 " " f-o " S ~ " ~ "
~ " '0 a :0 .'2 0 " .'2
" "- ~ ~ u .s u .s "
Q ,; " -
>T s -S " Z 0 " ~ Q 0 '0 U Q 0
0 " '0 0 '0
J2. " "- ] go '0 " ,0 " ~ '0
" '0 u ,; ?t. 0' '0 J2.
a " .0 " ~ 00 0 1i ?t. r- ~ r- 0 ?t. J2. '""
-T 0' '"" ci
" '"" " - u '0 <> <> .;; " ~. - -
..... >, '0 - " " ~ ,^ E >. >> '0 - >, 1i >, 1i
.. .D ,0 " .:!l " ~ ~ .D '0' .D ~ .D '0 .D '0
'0 0' >, ~ ~"- ~ '0 '0 >, ~ ~
.D ;; 5 '0 ~ ~. .D '0 '0
" r- '8 Q Q U U V " U
... ~ >, <l - v " V; v. , >. ~ >. '0 ~ 'ii ~ '0
0 .D ~ f-o ~ 0 0 .D 0 .D ~ 0 0
" ~ w ~ u " " ~
b .D ~ " "
'0 0 .~ 'Q .~ '0 U '0 .~ V; " ':F:
u " u 0 S2 1 .~ ~ g u " ~ u .s
'0 v. ~ ~ ~ '0 .~ 0 0
.... 0 .5 N ] 0 0 '0 ~
~ u j . ~ u ~ 2: ~ 'C . '"
v .~ ....l 3 " ~ ?- v G is u ....l is 0 Q .2
0 i= ~ u u G:
f-o f-o " '0 ~ ~ f-o '0 - '0 f-o f-o - "'-
u
on ~
0 !l,,~ ,0 ,.0 ,0 t. ,0
~ ~, ~ .,; ,;.;'=: - ,0 0'
0 ~ :; Co x ~ o' ~.
g,.;> ~. ';' Z ~, - N -
.
~
0 . .
{ ..... , 1;: ~ ~
. .D ] " ,
2J ~ t -" -" OJ g~ . a . a
'r;, 15 u ~ ~ '0 '" a
.... "", .D 00 ~ a. a.
- - - -
.....>. a
. " '"
~ .
~ ,..,
'. .;;
.. 0 ~
.' '0
. ;r; ~
'. . e:: 1
u u
,," on
'0 2J ~ 2
= 0 '0 '0
.. > U U
....l i. CJJ ~ " "
Z .g 0; .g ;;
".0 0 '0 > > 0 .~
" 3 . "
i= " - 0 'C 'U
f-o ~ "::. ~ ~ .",
:n 0 2. l:. '"
--: 3 ;;l OJ '" 0 ::: =:.
'" 0 ~ .~ ~' .~ v. - -,;
0: c: U u -8 u .,. "
,... 'S :; " .~ 0;: 'J
U ~ VJ := .~ '0 " '0 '5 " 'G
'" > a '0 ~ 0 '" " 0 ... " '" ~
. 0: '" :;;: v :;;: :5 ;;; ....l v :r: 0 :;;: 0: Vi'
'" U ~ N ::;' 00 00 -T
~ ;, - N ~. N 'r', - N -
....l -T -T -T 'r. lr; ~, ~ r- oc.
>>
>>'0
- 0
;ri5
83
ti~
._ 0.
~~
'U ~
....l
u
~
1"
.~
~
o
"-
;!:
~
i=
<>
~
""
,;,
~
~
'G
0
,
,
-<
c<I
" 0,
u 0
I'
Ii 0
N
0
0;
0
Is 15
u
,"" ....l
00)0')
,_0"-
~o-.-
N~
ci .0
Z~0?
'7
:::..:::: Q)
~20l
-moo
~2o..
c
"
OJ
<{
III
II>
.;:
o
01
II>
-
III
t)
II>
II>
u...
-
()
III
~c.
-g E
::l'O
.5 II>
--
l:: ()
o II>
()-
_II>
.-~
II> 0
..0.....
III III
~ II>
01
l::
III
..c:
t)
~
:2:
>
-
-
-
II>
()
"-
II>
a.
..J ..J ..J ..J ~ '" 'l>
..J w.. w.. - - ..J ..J
w.. w.. ..J '" x u
-5 -5 .3 -5 w.. " .52
-:5 .5 .5 w.. " U ,....
" " .5 " .2 :J =i "
" " " " .g 0 ..J x -5
~ u 0 " :3 " " '- x
'S '" 0 "
" " " " " " 0 3
.g 'S '" '" '" " " 0 OJ 'd, ~
"- "- "- "- '" '" " C/O 0 "
"- 0 0 0 0 "- "- '" '" G "
0 0 0 "- -5 " "ii
" " ;; " " 0
" a " - '" 0;-
S " " " " 0 "
" " .. - " ~ "
.. ~ ~ ~ " " -B ~ 3 ~
" 0 " -~ "
0 -5 -5 -5 '" 0 " 0 0 'S '" 0
'" , .0 " '" -5 0 '3 ,.0 '"
?!'- " e' ;l': :..:: ;l': '" - S ~ .0' U "
c i- '" .". :0 .0 ~ U .". f- e'
N - - - - N ,.., -, ." ,.., "
C N - - X >, 0 0 ~ -
'" .f' >-, >-, >-. '" .E 0
~ >-. .0 .0 .0 >, >, >, ~ "C Ch >,
C .0 .0 .0 .0 G .0
'0 '0 '0 '" C' '0
~ '0 .0 0 ..; 0 ,J; ~ '" " ..; '0 " '0 ,;. '0 ..; " N f- ~ , '0
=. U ~ 'z 'n 'C;;; 'r:;:; ^ V 'C;;; U '[7. " ~ >, '0 0 0
, ^ " " " " " ^ ~ " . <is " ~ ,
~ " ~' " i u ~, V 2:' " 2:' " >, 0 ~. " "" .0 0 " -g "
~ " .~ .~ " .~ ~ " "fj " " ~ 3 '0 " ~ "
.~ g g g :], "ii "
" " " .. a ;; a " 5' ~ .E .!5
~ ~ f- :;3 0 f-
~ 0
f- 3: t 2 ~ ~ ~ " " " z S
z .~ '0 .~ z z 2 6. u '" " z
'" ~ "- - '" - " '0 " :;3 ~ "-
-i2 ~ ~ -i2 -i2 0 0 " "
" 'S " "ii "ii "ii "ii " '" ..J '0 a ~ -5 "ii
" :> .. " " " " " " " a " ; " " f- '.'? " a
, c '- " '- ., '- .0' .' C'
.. '" .. c' 0 6. 0 6. 0 .0 '2 ?f: .~ , - ~ .0' N ..0
0-' '" .,. ~. c' -, .. .". ~ EO C'
~ 0 - ~ - " - ~ - ;; x fi 0- " - ~ >, -5 >-, .". 0 >- '"
s :f;- ~ .0 .0
>, .2 0 >, 0 >, 0 >, 0 .2 0 >, >, .0 >-. 0 >.
.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 '" " '" .0 , '0 .0
~ ~ 1! ~ -5 -5 ~ ..5 " 0 ;.;
'" '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 , 'S " '0 '"
if. ~ " 1. ~ " ~ ~ " , ~ ~ 0 " ~
-J; ~ ~ ~ , -J; " 0 " " "
" ;:; " " ~ " " ~ ~ " V) .:J " " 0
" a a " " " v g " 0 "
.. .. u "
.~ ~ .s g ,g .g " 0 '0 " ~ '" "
0 'J " " " 0 " 0 :; j .- " "
>- c: >- .- ~ >- >- >- '0 >- '" '0 '" '0 0
"
..J .. ..J 0 ..J .. ..J ..J ..J 3 ..J .. ..J .. u ? - 'n Q ..J -;
f- G G ,.... ~ ,.... G ~ G ,.... G ,.... G ,.... G ,.... Ii: - f- f- 0
.
:!' ~ ~ I
;; ~ '"' C .0 .0 C C C C .0 ;,'? .- c .0
0 .0 c. ~ C .0 .0 C c'
.: ~ :;: x '" - - '0 " ~ '" 0- C' ".
U " ;. ~, ~, ~. N ~,.., e, e. .". r~ "';' -
~ ~
.0
I ~ '- ~ 't: 'to
- " ~ ~ " " " " " ~ ,
'c " ~) " 5 " 0 "
~ ,3 ~ ~ ?' ::!J ~ " ~ '2 " ~
:J , ". ", '" '" ". -~ " I
- - " - , - - Vi - '";; - '" ",
- - - - -
'5
~
2) 3
. ~!J , j "ii I
- ;; I
. - 2L ? '-7) :Of) -:;; ~
~ , ,::!J ~ I
:J " :f;- .. ~
-" , 0;- "
'"
C ~ -Jj Ch ;'J :
~ .. .. ~ 3 c<
-' - 'n C/O ;:; Vi '"
.OL .. - ~ '1 "? - '"
" - , " ~J)
- - - - - ..
- .g 0 ~ "
.. '" 'i) c5 2
.:.i .. - ~ 0
~ ;f, :j ~ ~ ->. "
Vi 'i' 0
I :;: 'n - - M I c 0' - ,.... UJ
- - - - - .., :J b
~ I .~ ;; ~ ~ ~ - -g
~ .::
"" " :; " " " " " " " 0
" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ Z v:' :C c5 ci:i
,
"" U .. .. - C) - -
t::: '" M ,.:::) N ;::j M N .". ~, x -
.... Co: Z x x x x x x x x Z x Co
>-
>-'"
'" ~
5V3
02
b~
- "-
=a::J
U ~
c..
~
1
.3
;;
,..
(3
Q,
~
"
~
f-
~
g
"
"
;;
3
o
~
.:(
"d
" 0-
" "
~"
-N
o i>o
~ @
" "
'0 ~
=~
c..
00)(")
r---O..-
-""D~
N......
,0
0.".
~.".
:::-=
(1) (.) (l)
.....1-0)
-roro
.g~o...
c
(l)
en
<(
....
o
nl
~a.
-g E
::l-o
.:: CIl
.... ....
I:: 0
o CIl
0-
_CIl
(\II/)
...
CIl 0
-....
..Q t/l
nl CIl
f-C)
I::
nl
.l:
()
f-
a
>
....
I::
CIl
o
...
CIl
c..
t/l
CIl
";:
o
C)
CIl
....
nl
()
CIl
CIl
U.
~
~...,-
~ e~
UQ,;.
~
>.
~-sa..D
Cd a]
_ 0 ~
.g g ~
ii M ~
:.Ll 8 "0
...:::: :: r-
oo .;:;; z
:.JJ-oo..
~ ~
il.l.S:! a
-5c~
4-< u <n
o 0 >.
'" co ..D
" '0 '0
>. - "
-:;j ~ ~ 0
a ~ ~.~ a
~ '" U - .9
:: ~ ~ C6 u
~.;:;; -J B :::l
i) ~'r- ~ "'g
:OCuiu:o
.2 on :: (J) <::l
~ .~ ~ ~-~ ~
~o 0:;:: U _ 0
&;2"B.2u':i5 C5
~.~V) 1j g;!ft. g;11,
..D ..0 ~ ~.~ .~
" '" :- '"' ,..".. .2
~~-5~O
~ ~ .2 B ~
.I\.l :oj 0
'"::l -:;l ~
c::: 'C
V 0 ;2
f-G: ~
"
" 0
E-o
" 0
'" 0'
0.0
" -
;'. <C
.n 2-
.~
"
'5 0
"
=; "
a
..;:
o ~
'..:: .g
~ ~
" '"
~ 0
~ ~
'a 5
.~
"
a ~
~~ .S
- .5
~
"
"
o
E
...
o
5
.s
"
"
'"
0.
"
" 2
" "
'0 "
0.'"
::I 's:
a F-
EE
" '"
" "
"0 ~
" "
:0 iJ
o ~
2.::;
~ f-
o
u
- ~
E....o
<f. ~
~
o
o
N
1;; ~
o.f-
~
~
=> e
"0 0
= . 0
= " t'
.. > "
0 ~ '"
c
~ 0 v
i3 g
,
.~ "
.. '"
:;: cI3 1;. -
.... .:s ~
'" ;; "
" '" 0- :I:
'" U N N
t: ;:J ~. H",
.. ~ ~ ~
0;
'S! ~
;; .g
.g '0
'0
0
'0 '-
w 0
'" .~
w "
'- u
,5
en <Ii
.~
8"5
~ -;;,
~ il.l
- cS
''0.2
" "
.;:;; ::l
>, "0
~ ,,0
- 0'
a 00
"'>.
~ .D
~]
~ ~
..D ~
:3 B
" '"
" ..J
"'f-
?f? .
~ 0
>."
.D'O
"" "
il.l U
gj:.o ui
~ .2 ~
.~ ~ ~
,.."..:gV)
6 0 v
r-G:r-
on
~ 1::
<C
Z
o
~
>.
>,-0
~ "
3i/5
o "
U:;
]"R
'0::>
U ~
0..
Q
"
~
.9
;;
t
o
"-
;!?
f;;i
c:
~
u
"
~
..0
.s
~
-0
00
,0
c'
~,
"
"
~~
Vi ;a
~~
..{Q3
~ ~
'"'::l'5ij
" 0
g,w
0.0
<C .2
" ;;;
" ,..
vo 5
"-
VJ '"
" -
:.a ~
Bf-
vl'-
o
"
:3
"
.s
.n
"
;;;
'0;
o
"
"
<C
;j
~
'5
o.
"
;;;
" ~
~
C;.9 &,.g
u _ 'C: VJ
.~ ~ t-'~
;u 3: u
~5.zzel
'8 ~~ ~ c
[7. v-iJo
u .9--J H
~ :-. ".., ;... .;:::-"
6f-<.C~:-WJ
ct I f- I "F-
~ -(/)
"'SJ,...-JzuWJ
G: !-~:-t:.
1
;]0">.
.::; g
-N
q >.
~ @
" "
-0 c
_..0
~E
;; 2
0-. 0
Z
.t\;;en:a :tem ~~o, 170
I~arch ~ 0 2009
Page 45 of 113
Interstate and Toll Facilitv Discount Factor
This variable is used to recognize that Interstate highway and toll facility improvements
are funded by the State lIsing earmarked State and Federal funds. Typically. impact fees
are not used to pay for these improvements and the portion of travel occurring on the
interstate/toll facility system is uSllally eliminated from the total travel for each use.
Currently, 1-75 is the only interstate running through the County.
As shown in Table 2. based on Ihe dam from the 2030 Lee/Collier Transportation Planning
model, the vehicle miles of travel (YMT) on ]-75 relative to the total YMT on the cntire
funclionally classified roadway network was calculated lIsing the base year 2000 model
output and projecled t,'Towth in tenllS of new development from the 2030 Financially
Feasible Plan FSUTMS Model OUtpllt. The 2008 interpolated YMT resulted in an
adjllstment factor of approximately 8 percent dlle to travcl on 1-75. which was consistent
with the 2000 and 2030 model output. ThllS, an intcrslate and toll facility discount factor of
8.4 percent will be applied to the impact fee calculation. The adjustment factor excludes
extemal-lo-exlernal trips, which represent traffic that goes through Collier COllnty. bllt does
not stop in the County. This trat1ic is excluded from Ihe calclllations since it does not come
from the devclopmcnt within the County. Table 3 shows the calculation of this figure.
This factor is used to reduce vehicle miles of travel that the impact fee charges for each
land use.
Table 2
Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor (1)
Facility VMT excluding EE Trips
2000 2008 2030
Interstate 75 425.154 690,895 ] .353.310
Other Roads 5.207.4 75 7.485.682 14.567.991
All Roads 5.632.629 8,176.577 15.921,301
'X, of Travel (1-75) 7.5% 8.4% 8.5%
(I) Source: 2030 Lee/Collier T ransportalion Planning FSUTMS Model
Cost Component
Constl1lction costs increased significantly in Florida and in Collier County between 2005
and 2007 due to additional CC'!1struction demand caused by hurricanes, the housing market
growth, and other factors. Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher right-of-way
(ROW) costs over the last sevcral ycars. In early 2008, costs started 10 stabilize, and most
recently, some communities started to experience a decrease in costs. Infonnation from
-,
Tindalc-Olivef & .A ""nci;:ltc". 1n('
February 2009
9
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda item No. 17D
March 10,2009
Page 46 of 113
Collier County, roadway cost infonllation from other cOlin ties in Florida, and from the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was used to develop a lInil cost for all
phases involved in the construction of one lane mile of roadway capacity. The following
subsections sllmmarize the methodol06'Y and findings of the total unit cost analysis for
county and state roads. Appendix B provides the data and other support information
utilized in these analyses.
County Costs
This section examines the ROWand construction costs associaled with cOllnly roads with
respect to transportation capacity improvements in Collier County. For this purpose, recent
bid data for on-going projects provided by the county and recent construction bid data from
county roadway projects in Florida were lIsed to identify and provide sllpporting cost data
for cOllnty roadway improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was
separated into eight phases: design, ROW, construction, conslruction
engineering/inspection (CEI), utilities, mitigation, interchange, and carrying costs.
Based on recenltrends for completed projects in Collier County. design costs were
estimated at seven percent and CEI costs were estimated at six percent of construction
costs. Appendix B, Table B-6 presents the reslllts of the review conducted to recommend
these percentages.
Ri!!hl-of-Wav (ROW)
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along the corridor that was
necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to v./iden or in the case of new construction
to bllild the road. Based on the local data, a ROW cost of$].3 million per lane mile was
used for cOllnty roadway projects with urban design characteristics. Appendix B, Table B-
I provides a detailed description of the projects analyzed.
Based on discllssions with County staff. it is anticipatcd that all of the lane miles that the
County will build in the future will have urban design characteristics.
COl1stl1Jcthm
A review of recent construction cost data for Collier County shows that the County had
two urban roadway design projects bid in 2007. A review of recent projects let in 2007
and 2008 in other Florida counties identified ]2 lIrban design bid projects ran,,>ing trom
approximately $1.710 $4.2 million per lanc mile. Based on the local and statewide
Tindale-Oli'\'er & Associates, Inc.
February 2009
10
Collier County
Transponation Impact Fee Update Study
.fl\gervja Item ~~o. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 47 of 113
project data, a construction cosl per lane mile of$3.1 million was used for urban design
roadway projects. By only lIsing dala points from the past two years, the cost per lane
mile reflects the recent trend of decreased costs. Appcndix B, Table B-2 provides a
detailed description of the projects analyzed.
Based on discussions with County SlaJI. it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the
County will bllild in the future will have urban desi!,'ll characteristics.
Other Cost Con1Donents
The unit cost per lane mile for county roads in Collier County also includes updated
utilities, mitigation, interchange and catTying costs associated with capacity expansion
projects.
Utilities and mitigation cost estimates were developed based on four recently bid lane
widening projects in Collier COllnty. As shown in Appendix B, Table B-3. the utilities cosl
is approximately $455.000 per lane mile and as shown in Table 8-4. the mitigation cost is
approximalely $99.000 per lane mile for county roads.
Interchange cost estimates were developed based on two (2) planned interchange/grade
separation projects in Collier County that are expected to be completed by 2030. These
projects consist of improvements at the intersection ofl-75, CR 951 and Davis Boulevard
and where the US 41 (Tamiami Trail) meets CR 951. The total interchange cost provided
by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department is $28336 million. This figure
was then divided by the lOtallane miles being built in the 2030 LRTP Financially Feasible
Constrained Plaa (434.7 lane miles). As shown in Table 4. the interchange cost per lane
mile is approximately $652.000.
The lane mile cost includes an update 10 the canying cost that tends to occur while a
roadway is being built (approximately a 6-year proecss for COllnty projects). As presented
in Table 4, the carrying cost per lane mile is estimated at $259.000 based on the time table
provided by the county for each phase. This figure takes into consideration the fact that the
COllnty receivcs some ofthc impact fees up front.
As shown in Table 4, the total cost per lane mile for county roadway projects is estimated
at approxima1cly lj;fi.3 million
Tindale-Oliver 8:: Associates, lnc.
Fcbruary 2009
I]
Collier County
Transponation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No, 170
March 10. 2009
Page 48 of 113
Table 4
Estimated Cost per Lane Mile by County Project Phase
Cost Phase Cost Per Lane
.. '. Mile
Design()) $217.000
'2) $1.300.000
Right-of-Way'
Constructionl31 $3,100,000
CEI(4) $186,000
Utilities") $455,000
Mitigation(6) $99.000
Interchange(7) $652.000
C . (8) $259,000
an-ymg
Total Cost $6,268,000
(1) Design percentage from Appendix B,
Table B-6 multiplied by construction
cost (Item 3)
(2) Source: Appendix B, Table B-1
(3) Source: Appendix B. Table B-2
(4) eEl percentage from Appendix B,
Table 8-6 multiplied by construction
cost (Item 3)
(5) Source: Appendix B, Table B-3
(6) Source: Appendix B, Table B-4
(7) Source: Appendix B. Table B-7
(8) Source: Appendix B, Table B-8
State Costs
111is section examines the ROWand construction costs associated with state roads related
to transpOliation capacity improvements in Collier COllnty. For this purpose, the Dislrict I
FOOT Work Programs provided local ROW acqllisition and cost estimates. In addition,
recent construction bid and ROW acquisition data !Tom state roadway projects elsewhere in
Florida were used to identify and provide sllpporting cost data for roadway improvements.
Similar to the cOllnty cost analysis, the cost for each state roadway capacity project was
separated into seven phases: desiblJl, ROW, construction, CEI, mitigation, interchange, and
carrying costs.
Based on a review of the design and CEl costs for state roads, it was detemlined that the
relationship between desif,'11, CEI and constmction costs have not changed since tbe 2006
Tinoale-Olivcr & A~soci!'lle"" Inc,
February 2009
12
Collier County
Transp0l1ation Impact Fee Update Study
,p,genja item I'Ja. 170
:\1arch 10.2009
Pa~le 49 of '113
lIpdate study. Therefore. the design and CEl costs were estimated at ten percent of
construction costs.
Ri<rht-oPVar (ROW)
FOOT has not recently acquired ROW for any lane widening projects in Collier County.
Based on discllssions with FOOT and Collier County, il has been detennined that the ROW
acquisition cost for state roads is equivalent to that of cOllnty roads. Therefore, a ROW
acquisition cost of $1.3 million is used to calculate the unit cost per lane mile of an urban
design state road.
Based on discllssions with FOOT. il is anticipated thaI all of the lane miles thaI the State
will build in the future in Collier County will have urban design characteristics. A review
of the lane widening projects along SR 84 in the 5-ycar plan con finned that only urban
design projects arc being considered.
Construction
A review of construction cost data for state roads in Collier County shows two future
estimates for urban desit.-rn lane widening projects. However, at approximately S4.9
million per lane mile, these projects do not reflect the cunent downward trend in costs.
Because there were not any recent local bids to retlect more accurate cost estimates, a
review ofrecent bid projects in other Florida counties was conducted. Based on this
review. a total of nine recently bid urban design roadway projects were identified. with an
average cost of$3,2 million per lane mile. Appendix B. Table B-5 provides a detailed
description of the projects analyzed.
Based on discussions with FOOT. it is anticipated that all oflhe lane miles that the State
will bnild in the future will have urban design characteristics.
Other Cost C01J1lJonents
The unit cost per lane mile for state roads in Collier County also incllldes updated utilities,
mitigation, interchange, and carry1ng costs associated with capacity expansion projects.
Since no data was available for mitigation costs of state roads, the mitigation cost for
county roads \\'W, used (Appenclix R; Table B-4) Also, the state road construction cost
estimate presented in Table 5 does not includc ulility cost dlle to the fact that the Collier
County \Vater-Sewer District pays for utility relocation costs associated with state facilities.
Tindale-Oliver 8: _Asslxiatcs. fnc
February 2009
13
Collier County
Transpoltation Impact Fcc Update Study
Aaenda it8m t~o. 170
~ March 10, 20(;9
Page 50 of 113
As with cOllnty roads, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000 for
state roads. Appendix B. Table B-7 provides more detail.
In addition, the lane mile cost inclndes carrying cost that teods to occur while a roadway is
being bnilt (approximately a 7- or 8-year process for State projects). As presented in Table
5, the carrying cost per lane mile is approximately $264,000 based on the cost components
associated with constructing a state roadway. This fignre takes into consideration the fact
that the County receives some of the impact fee revenues (that charge for travel on all
roads) lip front.
As shown in Table 5, the total cost per lane mile for is estimated at approximately $6.2
million.
Table 5
Estimated Cost per Lane Mile by State Project Phase
. Cost Per Lane
Cost Phase Mile
Desi!,'11(]) $320.000
Right-of-Wal') $1.300.000
Construction(3) $3.200.000
CEl") $320.000
Utilitiest51 $0
Mitigation'h] $99,000
Interchange(7) $652.000
CaITying(8) $264.000
Total Cost $6,155,000
(1) Design is estimated at 10% of
construction cost<;; based on the 2006
update study and recent statewide trends.
(2) Source: Appendix B. Table B-1
(3) Source: Appendix B, Table B-5
(4) CEI is estimated at 10% of construction
costs based on tne 2006 update study and
recent statev./ide trends.
(5) Note that the Collier County \Vater-
Sewer District pays for utility relocation
costs associated with state projects.
(6) Since state data on mitigation cost was not
available, (0 be conservative, the
mitigation cost for county roads \vas used.
(7) Source: Appendix B. Table B-7
(8) Source: Appendix B. Table B-9
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, fnc.
February 2009
14
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda 11eril ~~o. fTD
[,13ICh 10,2009
Pa'~e 51 of 11 3
Summary of Costs (B1euded Cost Aualvsis)
The weighted average cost per lane mile for connty and state roads is calculated and
presented in Table 6. The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $6.3 million
per lane mile will be utilized in the calculation of the impact fee schedule. This weighted
average cost per lane mile includes county and state projects and is based on weighting
the lane miles of pro[,'fammed futllre roadway improvemcnts included in the 2030 LRTP
Financially Feasible Constrained Plan. As noted previollsly. the project infonnalion and
methodolob'Y used in these ca1clllations are included in Appendix B.
Table 6
Estimated Cost per Lane Mile for
County and State Roadway Projects in Collier County
, County State County and
Cost Type Roads!l) Roads(2) State Roads(3)
,
Design $217.000 $320.000 $228.330
Right-of-Way $] .300,000 $1.300.000 $1.300,000
Construction $3.] 00.000 $3.200,000 $3.]] 1.000
CEI $186.000 $320.000 $200.740
Utilitics $455.000 $0 $404,950
Mitigation $99,000 $99.000 $99,000
Interchange $652.000 $652,000 $652.000
Carrying $259.000 $264.000 S259.550
Total $6,268,000 $6,155,000 $6,255.570
Lane Mile Distribution'" I 890/0 11% ]00%
(1) Source: Table 4
(2) Source: Table 5
(3) Lane mile distribution (Item 4), multiplied by the design, ROW, construction,
eEL utilities, mitigation, interchange and carJ)'ing phase costs by jurisdiction
to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile
(4) Source: Appendix B. rable B-JO.ltems (a) and (b)
Capacity Added per Lane Mile
An additional component of the impact fee equation is the capacity added per lane mile
(also known as maximum service volume added per lane mile) of roadway constructed. An
analysis of 2030 LR TP Financially Fcasible Constrained Plan projects (see Appendix B,
Table B-l0 for the list of projects) was conducted to retlect the mix of improvements that
Tindale-Oliver & A~.sociale~;, Inc.
r ebruary 2009
15
Collier Countv
Transp0l1ation Impact Fee Update Study
A;Jenda item f'~o. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 52 of 113
will yield the vehicle miles of capacity (YMe) that will be built in Collier COllnty. The
resll]ting weighted average capacity per lane mile calclllated based on these projects is
10.217, which is consistent wiw the capacity figure in the 2006 Update Study (10,90]).
Table 7
Weighted Average Capacity per Lane Mile
Source Lane Miles VehicIeMiles of ' VMCAdded per
... Addedll) " CllP~citY Added(2) "LaneMilb(3) ;
. " '
COllnty 388.20 3,762,928 9,693
State 46.50 678.546 14,592
Total 434.70 4,441,474
Weighted Average Capacity Added (4) 10,217
(1) Appendix B. Table B-1 0, hems (a) and (b) and for the lane miles added column
(2) Appendix B, Table B-IO, hems (c) and (d)
(3) Vehicle miles of capacity added (hem 2) divided by lane miles added (hem 1)
(4) Total vehicle miles of capacity added for county and state roads (hem 2) divided by total
lane miles added (Item 1)
Cost per VehicIe Mile of Capacitv Added
The impacl fee cost per unit of development is assessed based on the cost per vehicle mile
of capacity. As shown in Tables 4. 5. and 7, the cost and capacity for county and state
roads have been calculated based on typical roadway improvements. In order to eSlimate
the weighted average cost per vehicle mile of capacity, We cosl per YMC for cOllOty and
state roads was weighted by We lane n-rile distriblltion of projects in the 2030 LRTP
Financially Feasible Constrained Plan. As shown in Table 8. the cost per vehicle mile of
capacity for travel on all roads within Collier COllnty is $612.27. This weighted average
cost per vehicle mile of capacity figure is used in the impact fee calclllation to detennine
the total impact cost per unit of development hased on the vehicle miles of travel
consumed. For each vehicle mile of travel that is added to the road system, over $610 of
roadway capacity is conslImed.
Tindale-O!iver & Associates, Inc.
February 2009
]6
Co!lier County
Transportation Impact Fec Update Study
Agenda item [\)0. 170
r"iarch 10, 2009
Pa98 53 of 113
Table 8
Weighted Average Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added for
County and State Roadways in Collier County
Cost per Lane Average CaPllcity Cost per
Sonrce Added Per Lane,
Miletl} -.. I' vMC(3)
Mile(') -
County Roads $6,268.000 9,693 $646.65
State Roads $6.155.000 14.592 $421.81
Weighted Average $6,255,570 ]0.217 $612.27
(1) Source: Table 4 for county roads and Table 5 for state roads
(2) Source: Table 7
(3) Cost per lane mile (Item 1) divided by average capacity added per lane
mile (Item 2) for county and state roads respectively
Table 9 compares the calclllated cost per vehicle mile of1evel of capacity added to the
VMC from the January 1. 2008 adopted value. As shown in the table, the cost per VMC
has decreased primarily because of the decrease total cost per lane mile.
Table 9
Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added Comparison
Source Cost per
VMC
2007 Collier (Indexed/') $750./i0
7008 Collier COllnty Report!') $6J?27
(1) Source: 200/i Collier County Transportation
Impact Fcc Update Study with an
approximate 30 percent increase applied
through the indexed fee schedule adopted
January 1, 2008.
(2) Source: Table 8
Credit Component
Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit
l'he present value of the p0l1ion of gasoline taxes generated by a new development over a
25-year period that is expended on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost
of the system consumed by travel associated with new development.
TindalehOliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
17
Collier County
Transpoltation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda item No. 170
March 10,2009
Page 54 of 113
County
In the cllrrent impact fee calculation, the credit calclllation estimated 13.3 pennies from the
county managed gas tax revenues that were lIsed for roadway capacity adding
improvements. For purposes of the Update Study, a review ofthe COllnty's FY 2009-2013
Transportation Work Program indicates that a combination of gas tax revenlles, impact
fees, grants. and ad valorem taxes are lIsed to fund roadway capacity expansion projects.
Collier County receives a credit of 4.9 pennies for the p0l1ioll of gas tax revenlles dedicated
to capacity expansion projects in the 5-year work program and 9.6 pennies for debt service
payments on the 2005 gas tax revenue bond. Based on discussion with County staff, all
bond proceeds were expended on roadway capacity expansion projects. In addition to the
gas tax and debt service. approximatcly $20 million of grant funds (lotaling 2.8 equivalent
pennies) are being used to fllnd roadway expansion projects. Thus. a credit of] 7.3
equivalent pennies will be given for the allocation of funds tbe county collects in gas tax
revenues and grants.
Stale
In addition, state expenditures on state roads were reviewed and a credit for the capacity
expansion portion attributable to state projects was provided. The equivalcnt number of
pennies allocated to fund state projccts was determined using infonllation for a 17-year
period of the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) Work Program (1997
throllgh 2013). A list of capacity-adding roadway projects was developed including lane
additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal
projects, and othcr capacity-addition projects. Major roadway expansion projects along
US 41, SR 84, SR 951, and CR 951 were inc1l1ded in this list as well as the major
interchange improvements at 1-75 and the Golden Gate Parkway. This review (which is
summarized in Appendix C, Table C-3) indicates that FOOT spending generates an
eqllivaIent gas tax credit of 13.5 pennies of gas tax revenlle annually. The use of a 17-
year period for purposes of developing a state credit for roadway capacity-adding projects
reslllts in a conservative credit for Collier County. The state gas tax credit is also
reIlected in Table 10.
In sllmmary, the County contributes approximately 17.3 pennies toward roadway capacity
expansion projects, while state spending is equivalent to an average of 13.5 pennies for
state roadway projects in Collier County. Therefore, a total of 30.8 pelmies of credit is
included in the impact fee equation to recognize the future capital revenue that is expected
to be generated by new dcvelopment from all non-impact fee revenlles. All non-impact fee
Tindale-Oliver & Associaks, Inc.
February 2009
18
Collier County
Transportation Impact fee Update Study
,'\g-::-:rY~a Item No. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 0,5 of 113
revenues have been converted to equivalent gas tax pennies for purposes of estimating the
revenue credit per unit of development.
Table 10
Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue
Credit Equivalent
Pennies
Stale Gas Tax Credit(l) $0.135
COllnty Gas Tax Credit(21 $0,173
Total $0.308
(I) Source: Appendix C. Table C-3
(2) Source: Appendix C, Table C.2
Ad Valorem Credit
The financing plan developed for the next five years (FY 2009-2013 Five Year Work
Prob'l'am) includes the lIse of a p0l1ion of the ad valorem revenues to fund roadway
capacity expansion projects, Of the ad valorem revenues available for transpOliation,
approximately $29.9 million will be used to fund capacity-adding projects over the next
five years. This is equivalent to approximately $6,0 million of ad valorem revenues being
dedicated to roadway capacity expansion annually. The value per I-mil providcd by
Collier County Transportation Department Staff is S82.8 million. Thus the percent mileage
used towards capacity expansion annllally is seven (7) percent ($6.0 million divided by
$82.8 million). It shollld be noted that, hased on discussions with County representatives,
the total ad valorem revenucs used towards transportation capacity projects will be fixed at
$6.0 million per year. As such. as the tax base increases. thc percent lIsed for capacity
projects will decrease.
Since ad valorem revenues are going to be used to fund a pOJ1ion of the five-year program,
a credit is b~ven. Credit dlle to ad valorem tax revenues fiJr residential uses is calculated
based on a review of recent sale Pliccs of single family homes in Collier County from the
Property Appraiser's datahase. TIle ad valorem tax revenues for non-residential uses are
based on recent sale prices and taxable values of ol1ice, industrial, and commercial
propc11ies in Collier County and estimated unit values from the Consultant's experience in
othcrjUlisdictions and industry knmv1edge. An explanation of the methodology used to
estimate ad valorem tax credit figures is included in Appendix D.
Tindalc-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
]9
Collier County
Transpol1ation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No" 170
March 10, 2009
Page 56 of 113
Present Worth Variables
Facility Life
The roadway facility life used in the impact fee analysis is 25 years, which represents the
reasonable life of the roadway.
Interest Rate
This is the discount rate at which gasoline tax revenlles might be bonded. It is lIsed to
compllte the present vallie of the gasoline taxes generated by new development. The
discount rate of 4.5 percent was detennined based on recent bonds used to fund roadway
capacity expansion projects.
Fuel Efficiencv
TIle fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles travcled per gallon of fuel conslImed) of the fleet
of motor vehicles was estimated lIsing the qllantity of gasoline consumed by travel
associated with a particular land use.
Appendix C, Table C-9, documents the calculation of fuel efficiency vallie, based on the
following eqllation, where "YMT" is vehicle miles of travel and "MPO" is fuel efficiency
in terms of miles per gallon.
',I: . '\' ' '\' [ VMT, ",,,,/, hI" J
Fuel E.uIClCl1CY = L..J"MTRoad\wy Type -:-- L..J MP _"
G1'elllclel)"pe R d 7'
loa l<ay ,17Je
The methodology utilizes non-interstate VMT and average fuel efficiency data for
passenger vehicles (i.e.. passenger cars and other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicles, slIch as vans,
pickups, and SUYs) and large trucks (i.e., single-lInit, 2-axle, 6-tire or more trucks and
combination trucks) to calclllate the lotal gallons offuc1l1tilizcd by each of these vehicle
types.
The combined total YMT for the vehicle types is then divided by the combined total
gallons offllel consumed to calculate. in effect. a "weighted" fuel efficiency value that
appropriately accounts for the existing t1eet mix of traffic on non-interstate roadways.
The YMT and average fuel efficiency data wcre obtained lrom the most recent Federal
Highway Administration's Highway Statistics 2006. Based on the calclllation completed
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Tnc.
February 2009
20
Collier County
Transpoliation Impact Fee Update Study
,.0..genda :tem No.1 lO
March 10,2009
Page 57 of 113
in Appendix C. Table C-9. the fuel efficiency rale to be used in the lIpdated impact fee
equation is 17.85 miles per gallon.
Effective Davs per Year
An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the proposed
fee. However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on
weekdays (e.g., office bllildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schuols). The use of 365
days per year, therefore. provides a IIconservativell element, ensuring that gasoline taxes are
adequately credited against the tee. As a result. no changes to the effective days per year
are proposed in this lIpdate.
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
The impact fee calculations for each land use (by impact fee district) are included in
Appendix F. This Appendix includes the major land lIse categories and the impact fees
for the individllalland uses contained in each of the major categories. For each land use,
this Appendix illustrates the impact fee demand component variables (trip rate. trip
length. and pcrcent of new trips). the total impact fee cost, Ihe annual gas tax credit and
present value of the gas tax credit, the net impact fee, the cllrrent Collier County impact
fee, and the percent difference between the calclllated impact fee and the current impact
fee. It shollld be noted that the net impact fee illustrated in Appendix F is not necessarily
a recommended fee, bllt instead represents thc most reasonable and legally defensible
impact fee per unit of1and use that cOllld be charged in Collier County. As discussed
throughout the report, the impact fee analysis has been completed using a conservative
approach to develop the impact fee pcr unit of land use.
For clarification purposes. it may be useful to walk through the calculation of an impact
fee for one of the land lIse categories. In the following example, the net impact fee is
calculated [or the single-family residemial detached (1,501 to 2,499 s.f.) land use category
(ITE LUC 21 0) using information from the proposed impact fee schedule inclllded in
Appendix F. Table F-l. For cach land use catcgory. the following eqllations arc utilized
to calculate the net impact fee:
Net Impact Fee ~ To/a//mpact Cost- Gas Tux Credit
\\ollere:
Tind(lle-Oliver 8:.' A, "r;;ori(lle<;;;" Inc.
F ebrllary 2009
21
Co\!ier County
Transp011ation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Iten1 No, 170
f'J!arch 10.2009
Page 58 of 1 i 3
Total Impact Cost = ((Trip Rate x Assessahle Trip Length x % NOF Trips) / 2) x (1 -Imerstate/TolI Facility
Adj. Factor) x (Cost per Lane Mile / Avg. Capacity Added per Lane Mile)
Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given 4.5% interest rale & 25-.vear.facility life
Annual Gas Tax = (((Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % Nel1} Trips) /2) x Effective Days per Year x
$/Galion to Capital) / Fuel E}Jiciel1(Y
Each of tbe inputs has been discllssed previously in this docllment; however, for purposes
of this example, brief det,nitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs,
along with the actual inpllts used in (he calclllation of the single-family detached (1.501 to
2,499 s.f.) residential land use category:
. Trip Rale = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.78)
. Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle-miles (5.88)
. Tolal Trip Length = the recommended trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile, which is
added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for travel on all roads
including local roads (5.88 + 0.50 = 6.38)
. ?'o New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadv.'ay (100%)
. Divide h.v 2 = the total daily miles oftravcJ generated by a particular category (i.e., rate*length*%
new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting oftravcl generated among land use codes
since every trip has an origin and a destinatiun.
. Interslate/Tol! Facility Discoullt Factor = discount factor to uccount for the travel dcmand occurring
on interstate highways and/or toll f{Jcilities (8.40,-0)
. Cost per Lane Mile'""' unit cost to construct one lane mile ofnmdway, in Silane-mile ($6,255.570)
. Average Capacity Added pcr Lane ..Hde = represents the average daily traffic on one travel lane at
capacity for one lane mile ofroudway, in vehic1es,!]ane-mile/duy (l0,217)
. Present Valuc'''' ealculJtion of the present value ofa unifonn scries of cash flov.'s. gas tax payments
in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;" for 4.5% interest and a 25~year
facility life, the unifonn series present \\'orth factor is 14.8282
. EffcdiFC Days per Year = 365 days
. $/(;allol1to Capilal = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital
improvenlents, in S/gallon ($0.308)
. FlleI E[fidcllc}' = average fuel cfJieiency uf vehicles, in vehicle-mileslgallon (17.85)
Using these inpllts. a net impact fee can be calculated tor the single-family residential
detached (1.501 to 2,499 s,f.) land use category as follows.
Totallmpacl Cost ~ ((7.78 * 5.88 * 1.0) /2) * (1 - 0.084) * ($6,255.570 110,217) = $12,828
Annllal Gas Tax = (((7.78 * 6.38 * 1.0) /2) * 365 * $0.308) /17.85 ~ $156
Tindale-Oliver & As~ociates, Inc.
F cbrumy 2009
22
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
P..:Jsnda :tem r;Jo. 170
'-' r\:larch 10.2009
Page 59 of 11 3
Gas Tax Credil = $156 * 14.8282 = $2,313
Ad Valorem Credit = $143
Net Impact Fee ~ $12,828 - $2.313 - $143 = $10,372
The complete fee schedule by land use is included in Appendix F. Table F-l
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in developing the Collier County transportation impact fee
prob'Tam, a comparison of other transportation impact fee schedules was completed.
Table 11 presents the comparison of transportation impact fees in the surrounding
jurisdictions and other peer jurisdictions in Florida.
Tinda1e-Oliver &: A""0ciaks. Tr1C'.
February 2009
23
Collier County
I'ransportation Impact Fee Update Study
00)(0
c-o~
,-~~=
. 0
.~o
~ <.0
c.c: Q)
2t:0'l
-roro
~2o..
c
Q)
DO
<l:
"
o
<Il
."
'"
0.
E
o
u
Q)
:;
'tJ
Q)
.c:
u
:;:00
~~
.cu.
"'-
.... u
'"
0.
,g
"
o
~
t::
o
"-
<Il
"
'"
~
....
M " = ~ 0
'E '0 Z '0 ~ M
-", '3 ;;<:: M 0 ~ Cl M
~ -i "" "" ~, ei
. 0 0 ~ ~ M ~ c;
~ = c, 0 ~ ~
-
" .
u
=€ ~ ~ M ~ ~
~ N N ~ ~ ~
Q ~ ~, 0 0 ~ 'r~ M
.C == 0 0 '" cf Or "" '"
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~, a c, s ~
. O! ~ = ;:: 0 ~
~ ~ ~ 0
~ "", rt ~ M ~, =. ~
iii ~ 00 ~ cr c: ~ c:
. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c,
. . 0 0 ~ ~
.~ 0 c, -
~ u
~,~ M M M r' 0 =
~ 0 M e, c, M
-t> ~, ,. ~ ~ ~ ~,
0 or e,j ei 00 00 ~.
.=. ; 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 ;;;
r' - ~
~,a
~, ~ ~ ~ ~:
'~<~,e. N ~ c, ~ S
N ~ 0
~ '" '" '" "" '" ~,
~ . 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c,
0 ;;;
0 c, S ~ ~
0
. u
56 ~ M ~ ~ ~
" ~ = " ~ 0
. -~ - = N
.. " cr cf or '" .r c'
. :5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;;
-' . N ~ ~
.
u
= ~ c, = = c'
~ ~ 'n oc 'n N 'n
0 '" ~ ~ ~ c, M ~
'" cr -i e' 00 -i
~ . 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ e.
. . 0 0 = =
'" 0 c, -
U
~ .n 0 ~, :c
~~ ~ 'r', ~ ~
i!I '0 r,! ~, 0 ~ CC
" ;:< 0'- ~ :;; =' 0 = ~
0 g ~ ;;; 0 = c,
'" . c, ;;; ~
0
U
"'~ >:' c, M ~ ~ =
-, D 7 ~,
.-"" M ~ ~ ~ ~
. .. =' ,C' '" ,'" 00 0
o '" = 0 - ~ - M ;;; ~
U.!! 0 o' ~ ~ ;;; ~
. . 0 g
SI " N -
..
0 2-
u
"'.: M ~ ~. ~ ~ ~
N N ~ ~ OC ~
~~ ~, 0 0, ~ ~,
Q~ - ~. =' '" 00
U! ~ 0' - ~ N ~ ;;; 0
0 0 ~ ~ ;;; ;;;
. . 0 0
. .. r' -
;;; "
o ':'.
u
. ~ j;; '-;;:: '-
. .
'" , g 0 0 0 0
~ ~ 0 0 0
:- 0, =: 0, o.
- - - - -
I~ 0
-
0 "
. 0
~ ~ 0
~ ~ cf e
. ~ il ~ ~ ~
:s ;0 2 "
~ d: u ~ C
.. 0 S 0
. -' ~ ] 0 .
. ;,.. c: ] 0 "
...l 0'''::: >-, - 0 " g .
.:::1 g " ~ 0 .
0 ~ .. " ~ =' " ~,
Co " ;; - Z ~ c, e
- .. C
- ~ -;; 0
I ",-" ~ :~ ~ -
.~I_~ " .. j -;:!
~ u S " 0 ;;
::=: LIl ~ ~ " -
~
;;
~
;
o
.s
.
.
1>
3-
"
~
o
o
~
.
-'J
~
]
0,
'"
E
D
-"
"
-'J
~o
~
]
"
;;
'~
:::
'"
"
"
-:ii
"Z
~
D
~
~
g.
8
i
'r:
2
~
;;
3
1
D
.
"
.
'"
.
]
"
~
.
.
.
~
~
il
~
~
"
o
z
.
"
Z
';
o
"
3
~
1
]
..-
o
E _ 0)
:.--. ._ e
-g ;.... ;:;
Jj C5~
~~r_J ~
~ ~ s ~
. _ c.. = '" c.
c3 "% <I; .~ o.
~ .s ~ ~ Cl o,j)
~ ~ Co.;... ~_
'" 1; g ~ -' ~ 2
"';' ~ '"
~"&_g ~~ 0:5:
~ _ 0. _ ..
~ ~J;g _.2 ~E ~
ig ~~ i~~
-g 1':' '" c.~ - -
::: :: 5 3.l ~'Cl ~ r:
a'~] _~~Cl3
',-~~,~ ~~~
"."~II~o~i~
~ ,,~ '" ~ -.
" -'~:E;:: _ ,0 "0
~~~iJ~"-c~
;~:~~HHH
~ [~~ii~~.~-~ ~
t3.z1 ~~jj2]~
Hj~Hjjjj~
"
"
<:
<
~
"
~
~
<:
~
"
g
~
o
z
8
~" ..,. __r:::- ~'"
.
o
-g
.E
~
o
:5
~
]
S
.
2
1>
~
o
,
.
;;
.
'"
~
o
~
]
~
]
.,g
~
o
"
;::
:i:>-G'
o 0
5V}
:.;~
" 0
.~
:.=c.
00
l..; ~
~
2
~
"
o
.
~
1l
~
.
"
"
.;
o
"
.s
2
~
o
~
,
~
"
.
'"
u
.
.~
i
'~
0.
~
g
~
i1
o
~
-g.
"
~
"
'~
~
,;:
o
3
;;:
~
]
o
"
8
,,'
~
c'
o
"
o
.
o
"
"
1
-a
.:::
3
]
.
~
';
'"
~
o
~
.
.
7
c,
o
~
~
"
'ij
~
~'
j
G
.~
o
3
~
-a
o
o
]
OJ
~
R
Il
~
3-
Q
1
Il
"
3
-'
, ~'
'fl <5
3(,,;
::>->='
:5 <;;
~ '
OJ 8
,Ol
~ ~
i~
5
i
.
o
U
~
:::
~
~g
,,~
1; [;
~ 2
::::il
,..~
/-\genda item t'<lo. i 7J
~,1ar:h 10, 2009
Page 61 of 113
APPENDIX A
Demand Component Calculation
Agenda item No. 170
March 10. 2009
Page 62 of 113
Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database
TIle Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database incllldes over 200 studies on 40 different
residential and non-residential land lIses collected over the last 19 years. Data from these
studies inclllde trip generation, trip len6'lh, and percent new trips for each land use. This
information has been lIsed in the development ofimpacl fees and the creation ofland use
plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S.
TOA estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a transportation impact fee schedllle
using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (7'h edition). In instances, wben both
Institllte of Transportation Engineers' (1TE) Trip Generation reference report (7'h edition)
and Florida Studies tlip generation rate (TGR) data are available for a particlllar land use,
the data is blended together to increase the sample size and provide a more valid eSlimate
of the average nU1nher of trips generated per unit of development. If no Florida Studies
data is available. only TGR data from the lTE reference report is lIsed in the fee
calclllation.
The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that
record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic cOllnt hoses are set at
entrances to residential subdivisions for tbe residential land uses and at all access points for
non-residential land lises.
The trip length information is obtained throllgh origin-destination surveys that ask
respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to
go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to cstimate average lrip
length by land lIse.
The percem new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected throllgh the origin-
destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The
percent new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are
captured. TOA has Pllblished an article entitled, Measuring lj'uve/ Characteristicsfor
Transportation Impuct Fees, IrE Jou171al, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology
for trip characteristics studies.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc
February 2009
A-I
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
AJ7;nda i:2'11 [\;0. i 70
fk:-jrch 10_ 2009
Page 63 oi 113
l.o,otion Si".!l'n;t. )>"" lo'.IN ~ Tr;p I,'n~l" rripG,,, n,,,o ro,;.,1 fdp Pc.."", N....T,lp. I'M"! ,'0"'"
j",o,,;o... In'cr-';,"" I.." I"nut.
<."..",,,,, l'd,'\ ').'1'."'".' ~.". '."-' ". .\L.!' "n-~"'"""
""'.",'"'''' GA "Il'.'''''' "" ,+-",:: .",' "" ,,=, ''"''~
","'o~' !-'L 00 )""-'.' .. .. "'.'" ~i^ " " 'm,"~('"''n'''
''''''',w'''',l'] " '"n-".' .. " '" H' "^ ~1O" "'",_m['""",,
''''''''''\'<'.I.'L ,,-' )",-", " - ,-'" . S,.' ~;.<" ,''''.,,~,
.. ,,"''',
""""~( ".I'L '" ,,,",,,' ('.' .. " -'" S',\ "." ,......~[.'"'"..
'...."~ C".~] lO.' ;"n_"' '" '" ',i' 4(" S,^ 'I." ,...",~['..",,,,
,,",,", C>, '" h,,,"' .. " I.'.'" '" N.',' '''.'''' ,...."~L'''"''''
- '.".",.,'" 1', '" hm,'!,' '. '." ",,' .' ~.',\ <".52 ,,,...,,., ..,,,,,.
_""",,,C".F: "" 111,,"_' "'" ~<J' "" ,. N.',\ <L0(l ",.,"'~( ,...1'
".."",,,1,,(',,."" " ","".'''' '" ," ,,,.,,' .m_"" " "...\ " " ""''''0.''1''-& '.,<0,,,"'.<,
""",""'oC,, .E ,;> '''.-'''' " ."" " .. r""'''''";;",,,, ""'''''''~
f1.....,,'..[., " '" \l",."" '" -.J'" " "'-" -'''' ,",,\ '("'> ",'m','>>"'"'' ,\...,c,",."
"",,~,>d,,('.. " '''' ,,,,,.,,,, ,,,' '"' " ,..',\ ,,,," ''''''''.....H'~,& ^"o,,""~
,.'~rl",,,r:,,, n ,-" 11,..-0' ~'" .. '",-' '"' N.',\ " " J"..."'_"h,~," A.~,c"''''-
n~rl"tL."o.n '" ,,,,.., co' .. '" ".--' , ,.,,, 'oJ',' "." ;"".,..(jl,,'''& ,\."",,,,,,
n"rloH" n ,I<' "c"_"' "," "" "" V.\ 1.1". '",!.I<-"',,~,~ A,~,,".""
(,horl..,,,C,, rl. ~] l ''''_0' ,<, 1.", ",",j, "..' ~'" "'Jr, I."I""_'""~,~A.~",,,..
('""L..II\"'" " '57 "<1.0; .. '''' ~:~ .., ~.'A -'''.)0( [,....',_r",,,~ &A_,u"",
('horl.."," " ,,-' ,,,,.'" ,,,, '''' """ ~:.-\ '<'.'" ,,,.,.,, 0',..." " ^~,,,"'"
""'rl,~"(',, " .'flh ,,<,.'" L', ,,'" ",-5' .. ~',\ "'" ,,,.1.,,.0',,,,,, , ""',,.....
,',..""",r" 1'1 '" 0"_,,, <I" . '" " "", ~.,' ,~ ,"J '''''''''_(>1",,,& A...,,,",,"
,,,rl",,,"',,....L W "".,>' ,," " '" , ", ",,\ "-" '","""__(Ji",,,,, .-,~"",,,,, -.
,"'.m"",(',,_" 'M (".-,.9' '<' ,. '- I.m ~.'-^ ...", ,,,,",,]..f",v,," "..",",""
''''''h", 1'1 "u """,,' '" ,- .. " ", '''-'' "'" \-'^ "'..' "",".I,_<JI'"," A",.""'~
'-"1",,(,,.]-''- ,,. "",.''! .'>" 1.'" """ .;,4U .'.'-A "" ,~ """;;,.m.,,.. ^""",.""
'~""l\, n " A,,,_O' '" ., '''_0' ",", '.-A 0.." ,,,"',",.f,,,~,... A.."""",
]-"",,",, " \,,-", ,,',,' ],,-, '", ,.-,\ '".,,', '""'"~.'''''~''' ."""",,,
l"",'" , , L" ","_u~ .,.,,, '.-,"' ,,, ~,,' "'J! [","""'_'JI"''''''A..""""
1'",-''''', H " A",_(j~ - '" '.,-, , ,. , ",' .I'." '"o.I",."Ii"",... ^~..,"'".
".,-"., " "', , "",_f)' " ,. ,,,' " , \~A "" ".L.I,"'I",,,& .-\",,,,,,,,
"."""(',, " ,. " ".11, " 0", ",- ,," '" <7.<1' ,,,,,.bo',,,,, , ".."'",,,.
,',",,,c,, " " -- A>T_'" "., - " ,,-,.. ," ...," I,","'.-(""'''~ .-\<~";""
"...., , 1'1 ,,, .,,,_,,0 " " ", ,,'ro' ;"'''"'''_(''n''''~ \<M"',""
,\t,""", " If" '\n,") " " " ~,.-\ -",.'" h'",cv-HomA .,,~'"''',..
",""" , " ",' , ..0) "., "'.-\ '''', ~.."',,_H,,,""- ,",,,m'..
"',""",, " '.'. - A",_'" ..-..-....-.. 11-' C'~",-I '....1 .,,,- A'"",",,,
"..,,'" ( " ,i, '\1"."., " - I \"" - , '"
"",,,,", " ""-,,., -- -,~:,- <.,j' "'V. >;",,"'.-",,"',' ,,,",,,,,,,,
,',,~,,( , , , " ",_H' " - ,..,.h'_'"'''.''''' ,\,"",,,,,,
,'Iln"(',, ,.-, '" ''''-(I' " ," .. ,,,01,,',.",,,,,",,, \'"""'"''
,'",""'" '" "cI_"- "" H" .-"" " , ',.-.\ ,. ;".I"','-''',,~,,, ,,~..,,'"
,',,,,,., ",' ''''''"' " " "" '< ," , ,,,.,.,,-,,,,'" , .,-,,,""'<
L'''''''' '.rL '" ,,,'~,, " ". "~'r ,," ~i,\ ',rio' ,,,,',,',-"I,,,,,~ ..,...""",,
I..... , ,- 'h.'" -'2' " ~, -- -... ~< "'''' ,,,.;,,,-, ,','" ~ .-\.. ,.,,,<,
, ,,,- ,'" I'i ,,-- Jk,~"', "" - I' ~ " ';;:';I<-I\',,~,... ,\","""",,
,~... Fi " ]),._H' ",," .'!,:' - ': " ~ i;;::i:::::::::;c~
"""',, 'L Or-, .. Hq ,.
]-",-, " '''',''" " " ';'., ',',," "m'''''.'''''~, , \,~",.,..
],,,,,.,..,, " 1'1 .. .,,,,_/J' <0" "j! ,. - ".\ -- ,-", ',,,1,,1,,-('1",,.,,,, ,\..",,,,,,
f Hm"""", 1" ~j= ',,"_n' .' .'-"l' " - "< ''''''''.-'''""., '""".",",
OJ<m""'" ..,F] ,';;'-0' '" , '-" " - -1-' "" "-1> ----i~~:::: oj"", " \""-'"""
!I,m","'''".,.., ", \.."i" -,,, , I " -;-. '" ',-", ,,",," , ",," "" ,
,,,,,' "~ """,~h'dA'" .. S','
"",.,,,,","".. 01,;, L.. tI,. ''IA
Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210)
"",~,.-\,.<,"". "."""""", "',,,
""",,,' b".I'."
s""""",,,,,,,J,,,mOr"''''-''"''''''''
",.".,,"-'11 ;('."
Exn]3n3tion: A notable exception to the blending process is [he singh: family n:siJential land use, \Vith over
55 study sites, the sample size for thc single family land use is rather large and representative ofeurrent trip
generating ehamctcristics of single family residential developmcnts in Florida. Since the daw has been
cnl1ected from sites over the past 10 to 20 ).'cars, it is more currcnt than lTF data amI reflects marc recent
demographic changes. For example, the average person per household has decreased from 3,14 in 1970 to
2.59 in the year 2000, indicating a reduction in the number of aver3.ge daily trips generated per dv.'c11ing unit.
As part of the 2008 Lpdate Study, the trip gt:nt:rution rate lllllle 2005 Study llf7.41 trips per dwelling unit
\vas updated to the Florida Studies Datahase aver;lge of7.7S trips per dwelling unit (with new stuJil's
conducted in Lake and llcrnando counties in 2006 and 20(7).
Tindale-Oliver & Associates_ Inc.
r ebruary 2009
A-2
Collier County
Transportation Impact fee Update Study
Jl,genda Item ~Jo, 170
Iv1arch 10. 2009
Page 64 of 113
Apartment (lTE LUC 220
1..o.orloo Sb.eiL;nllS !lore Tot:lIN U Trip Lco~tb TripGcn Time Trll' Pc..cntN.,,' "MT Source
InTerview. Interview. Rat, PerIod Len~ll, Trll"
,,,ru~'''' ("'.n. ]11 J"",~' " " '.71 <.lH "^ ,11.1)6 "n'~".( ,,,"',.
,,,"',,,'" ('<'.l-1, ].1' )""_~' 11, ", ~ ,~~ II.~n "^ (,7.11, ""'."'",C"..,,,
M,n,,"(AFL ,14 A "..I, n, 11'< IL"~ HI "^ .'15' ""olc,-il"111&^"''',"'c'
Mnm",('o.FI ]~" , ,-I.] n. ;1. (,W, '4' '" ~)."1 K""I.,.lh",,& ^,~'c",,,,,
M,n,mC".1-'1 ]~~ A",.jl, n, 11'< '.M ,." "^ 1141 K"ol",-lh>1111<' A,~"",,~
Mom",('" 1'1 4",' .~"'-"] 17' i7' ~ ,7) ('."N NiA ,"41 Km,I.,.lh>u,/l ^'~',"",,"
M,no1l(\' 1'1 "" ^",.", 17[1 :7" '.4(, "j. "^ ]24.' K,,"I,-v_IIHn'& A"~"",,",
I~k,(,,, " 1;(1 1>",-,,(, '" I)' (,,)] ", 1.' ,~ Im",It_Oltl'cr& A'~,,"o1e'
]~k,(",. H 1.'7 I"":-Hl, '"' '(,.' 1'.~7 2.0" NI^ )1,1,(1 1"".dc-OI"'"'&^""COn1C'
Llkc("'.I.] If,~ J""'~", 111 '."" ("I~' '" 4U4 Im..d,.()I",.'&A'~"""c,
l~k,'('", 11 :1(, '",',HI, )"1 ('.'4 ,.17 "fA ]4.(,1 1.,,,,,k_()]lvcr& A,~,,,",""
11,,,,,,,,J,,C".F1 'Ie ^".111 4'i6 4."" ,.~< '" 104 I'm<l,i<..OI,,,,,&^,,,,,,.,,",,
Plcm,,,J,,('''.cl "I, ,\,,-,,; )), .q, ;:4 NiA ';.I~ Im..,lc.Oln'c' .k^,,,~,,,,,,
I",,,I.,,,~ '4<,7 ~..," ,1'<1 I..... ',b, 4.ft
ITE W,I~lItodA>-.," hI I... ,~, '"
B""''''''L """I \V"'~'''cJ Aver"~""nV (;"""'''''0 Hmo ',-'I
ITE^"""~,'Ij'jp{;,'ll""U",, R",,, ILn
]\kDdoII'LS'",h..."drn;A'''O\l,l,ip{;,"",.U".R.,", (,..4
~.",,- Tile "",I "~I'll'''," .,,""y.',tl, I] ,"" n w"' ",cI",cd Pn'm "'"i 'Ie" A"c""~, "n" I""~tll ""kllla';,.., ^",,,,~, VM,] '4.1;
W,"'I"c,iA",,,*VM'1
Exnlanation: Forthe LUC 210 trip generation rate, a total of 13 sites (shown above) were blended with data
from 86 sites in the ITE 7tl1 Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data, The resulting TGR of 6.44
was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse liTE LUC 230\
Location Slzoil:nll. noto T~ta1# # Tril' Lcn~lb Tr1l'Gcn Time Trill PcrC'Il1N." "MT Source
IRtorvl.". lnu,yvl.",. It.t. P,rloo Lc~~th 'rril"
Ilom""I,,('''.FI " ",,,'-'}{, " " (>.I] 'IL,.(," N,'A "'" 1.."I"I,_OIn-"'''' A,",~,,""'
II'm"'.j,'{'"....1 I" .,"v-~(, ,'" ,." (,., 'J;"(' N/^ HI" Im,,.'c_OJn-cc& A".~.,",",
1'"",,('(,,1,1 ,,'J ^,,'"I~ ]'" 1% 4.'7 ~,.(, , N'A 1;<" I"""ie-'''n'",'''' A,~""..<<
1''''''''('''.11 ,~, ^"t"l~ ") 4.'4 ~,,-{, N'^ H-,", 1'"",11c'411n-,,.&^,,,,,,....,
1""1,,,., "-'I, ii,'"," .T,I l",,/b, '"
Tno '-Jill..: \\'.I'b,.d.\o..-"..Td,lAoo II" "\iA
1l1""Io.II",,1
hl,.'I,
\\"~lll,,,1 ^"cm~' 1 "p (.,,,,,,,,,,,," ~""
ITE^"","""'I"I'Gc"""",,,,, I'",,'
'<1,"<1 "I'I.S'",h".,,,Jln:,\""~,Trip(;,,,",.';,,,,R,,',,
H
',"
'.K!
ExnlanatlOn For the LUC 230 trip generation rate, a total of four (4) sites (shown above) were blended with
data [Tom 54 sites in the lTE ill Edition H<lndbook to int:rease the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of
5.81 "..as used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Mobile Home Park ITE LUC 240j
Lo<atlnQ Si,.ilj"ilS Uat. TOlalN # Trll' Ll'n~tb Trll'GCG Tim. >0, Pc".c",Nc'" VMT SU1lr<c
lm<nk",. Ime,,'i.w. R.n P<rlud L"'~lb Trip.
MO"''''(''.FL (,; )"I.'!I n n ;." 4'11" J,l~ '^ 12__" 1",";,I,.()lt\,,,'&A,~.,,,,,",
M,,,,,,,(',,.I'I ". r"I_'!1 '" IN 111,'" 14]" ),71 ,., 411.IH r"'J"I,.()h,'O\'&A",~,m",
MI1",,"('o.1'1 1'7 j"I.'!1 n n 'III )4., U, N/A 1.'.1' Imd"Ic.()I",,, & A",,,,,,,..
'''m~'W (n.'-'-I " "",,~, I'" Illll ." '.HI "-'A 17.~1 SOHI~'W C","''''
,,,",~,,,C,,.R <~J(> jH"'~' '"' '"' ~.I" Hi> NIA 1>." '"'''''''' ('"",,,,,
11c"","~,' en. rl 1,": ~"V-% 1:< ,:< ~.I:< 9,,,"_1>... 4.1) "^ 11.111, li",Ii>Ic-OIo>"' &,\"..~'''""
Mon,,,(',, FL IH^ , ,,(IJ '" ." ,411, q~ N.'A "),J' K.1m]c'V.lI"",&A'~"'"t'''
M,,,,,,,(',, n ~C7 ~ >e.'" 17' :.7{, )4h, ~.'H Ni^ ,4.]~ K,mh_II",,,I<A,~>,,",o<
M;I""Ll('" n 2'0 .\"','I! 17' O~ !~11, ~.n N/A eel' KlLnb.lI,,,.I<A".,,,"l,~
i<",,""~ '.1" iI"'''',1'rl ,~ ... 4.~l
1,-1 " ,~" W,I ~''''A>-,"' T,; l",..,U" ',~I>
]l""dcdt;,,,1
I",m]
\\,,~11'," ,\,,""~, 111V("~c""'"" I~IL'
ITi:A,'"~",, 1';V(j",",,,,,,,,, I~,,"
'.1'
4'~J
Exnlanation: For LUC 240, a total of nine (9) sites (sho\\-.'n above) were used to calculate the trip generation
rate. This data was not bknded \vith the ITE ill Edition Handbook because the ITE data is measured per
"occupied dwelling unit:' while the Florida Studies data is measured per ""dwelling unit."
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
A-3
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
!.:..gsnda It,;:;nl No. lID
rv1arch 10, 2009
?CJge 65 of 1 ~13
Looliun Si',eilloi" D~I. TOlaJ# ~ Trip L.n~lh TripGen Tim. Trip "errrnl"'e.. \'M'r Source
Imc"'i.w. Inter_icw. ltalc Poriod L<n~lI' TrillO
1","",,,".1'1 ,,' .1/ ,_4,',"!l1 " ., .'..'" "11II'" '" 'I:.n "'I, I m<lnk""II\w It A""""",,
M,m'," 1'". 1'] 77~ "'"', I" 1.~o )4.r ." N.'A '11.ll ",""".II"rn,,-A,~,,''''''''
Man,,"('''.FI "7 A ".,,~ "'" , ~] !<hr j'~' ,,' "" KLJ1lb.lhm,/oA,~"""o'
Man,,,,(",,,FI 1-'1.'4 Au.m ". 1,!,,1 :410, '''KI N'^ ",'J] K'1ll;,,,.I),,,,, I< ^,~'"''''''
M,o""(,, C< .',m, , ,.<1) I'" )(" ~4h, '.11, N-'A I'.'j K'lll!<-,.II"",/<: ^,~"'""~
M"in""C" fI 1-,-"< , ,-"2 "" c5n !4h, ~." '^ I', ~~ """1",11,.",&"""",,,,,
I."..IS,," ~.4n ""_., ., ,- 0, ""
liE 61'" 1I'.I.lodA...... " I..nl.' U2
Retirement Community/Age-Restricted Single Family (ITE LUG 251)
1\"'11"'0'''''" 1,..'11
Wmh,,,I,,,,,,,,,'"lnp''''lcThll,'',k",<
nl'A'.c",!,'I,,]";"'''''''''"!',''"
HIe"d ,,' ~l ~,,,oJ;"'M ITf. "".,,,,,,, '1 rip ,..",.,.,,,,,, Rot"
",.",;",\'\IT
W",'ht,'dA"m~cV'n
1)1
.1.!.'
I,:'
If,""
Exnlanation: For the LlIC 251 trip generation rat~, (l total of six (6) sit(;~ (shown abovc) \vere blended \vnh
data from seven (7) sites in the ITE 7111 Edition Handbook 10 increase the sample size of data. rhe resulting
TGR of 3.13 ""'as uscd in .:ukulating the transponmion Impact kc rate.
I
w,,"li'lR ISi,,'iliOil;j
r"nciJo,I'",K.1'I
d",II""".I.1 "'"
"""1',,.<
rn ,;;~
1<1".<1",1,,,,,,1 ""
Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) (ITE LUG 253)
n.1O I 1 utol ~
Int"rvlew,
W"'~"""" ,I' ," "ce' ] n,. ',e"",,", ,',,"<
Ill'. .\""r"~' I ":' (;,,,<,,..,,.,, 1(""
1lI,'uo ,fFI. ".d;,,, ",,,'nt ,\".,".,. hi" (;,,,,,,.,,"" 1<."..
Porc"mNe" I nn I
Trrp'
1\-'.\
~,"
Sourre
I
~ 'I'rtp LO"~lh I Tdl'Gon
loterw'w, I n'le
"I 1 '5"
".
Tinle I Trip
Por'iod L.c,,~ll,
'""".;", ;;<1
'"".,," '<"
"",," .Trll....k, Hili
1".1 hh<lM.r. Td Lc" 'b, !.0Ii
1",j,,,,"'I,,.,',/i.I\,,
,,,,,h,.nl,,'c"/i'A'
,,",,-"J
""_"1 ~,
l,lI
Explanation: For the LUC 253 trip generation rate, a total oft\'..'o (2) ~iles (sho\',.'11 above) were blended with
data from two (2) sites in the ITE 7111 Edition Handbook to inneuse the sample si7c ordata, The resulting
TGR (1f2.25 \vas llsed in calculating the transportation impact fce rale,
Sire Total # # Trip L."~th lripGon Tio,e Trip I'rr."n' r<;el<' --
Loralion (nnom.;<1 1).1. 1r0l.._1...' In""'le,,, n.1O Porlod Len~lh Trip, \'MT Source
" " n".,1 - 11>" :,'11 'C' 1",""".,>in'"/iA"",,,,,,",
FI " O('I_"J I",~;, "" '.'J.Il I ",J.1k-OI"", I< A,~"",,,,
I'",oli",(,,, " "" Oel-'" 2r, , ,.,., '.'t', "-" 'l"cI;","L):"'",,-A',,~""e'
l'mdl"(,,.1-'1 ." A,,,'.H~ ,,, ",(, I:.';' '1.,'-' 0.11' -'-).1' , " ],"",1c'_0I"',, 10 A'''~,,'c'
1'""11",,,.1-'1 ." "<'.H~ '1' " 7,11' 12-1 IL"I "" ~' I " ILL"'1I1c,-,,,,,',~/.;A""'1"0'
1""],,,.< ',1: ,,"v,,"..Tri ,- .b, 4.86
11'I :"(~, "\hi b,odAv.. <'In ,.. Ib; '"
Hotel/Motel (ITE LUG 310 & 320)
fll""""",,.,,'
'''0
. 1'," ",",pit,,"" ""~.e1l1r ,,,,~'I> w,""" "",oj I",.U" Ii<"d l"oJ "" '(.1'(' "'II 'i,.'
We"'1:',j.'-'"".,, lnp';":Jcrlln"" R,,,,
ITI'^,'"""J"I"(""'''''''''''\J1t<'U1l' '1"1
"I."""'lI"'nl'''"",,'',,'ol<Jl\,(I.IK':''1
" ,,~
'.'7
,'.IL'
EXDlanation: For LUC 310, data from twp (2) hotels and three (3) motels was combined to calculate a
weighted average Irip length.
l.oco1io" Si"'(R",,m, I)". rm.l# ~ Trip 1"II~th hip G." J'''"'P,'ri"d rrip P,-r',eOINe" Iril" IMT I ."'",....,
hrlon'i,'w, Inte"'i,,,... Ratc Lenl~h
1'""'1,,,,(',,.1'1 '" ""'1_'" ,(, i1)".,p - ;", "'.11 1- Im,I"I.--Oi""r/i^,,,~'""";
-.--i~~,-- (~H" , ~ " '"1"'1' ,,,, "".() 1",,",I.~()I"'<r/.; A,,,~,,,,,
'k'.," n :""1' ,'.C(' 'H _n 1 1,,,I..;.,O;I\',rl< A,."~'"''
m ",.,,",,1,,; I~",th, .1.~.1 ..
\I'd Io,od""-~..,TJ; I~. '10, 4..1.
W''';'',...I.''''"''..,.... "
Motel (ITE LUC 320)
'''I'';c1101'''',lb'<
'11'M'He,'j".";"","",,,,, "'",. < ('.'
M,.",,,'V-"I
W''''1<""^",,,,,,,nu 1"1
Exnlanation: Due to a lack of trip generation rate data from the F1urida Studies, ITE data was llsed to
rcprc:;cnt the TGR for LUC 320.
Tindale~Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
A-4
Collier County
Transpoliation Impact Fee Update Study
AC1snda Item hlo. 17D
~ March 10. 2.009
66 of 113
I
l.<lc.tinn
I "'" I
(Sr",,,n.)I
,
"
Dal.
Movie Theater with Matinee CITE LUC 444)
I .10,.1# ~Trl]lL."~lh I Tril'G.o I Th~' I Trip p.rr.~IN'" I VMT I
Int"rvi.... lnr.n'i.... Rat. P.".,od L.n~{h T..,.,
J j I , ,r, , I' .111 , " c,7<> 17 ,Il ~\' 1-'
] '" 110 (,1.4U 2 ,.~ I.~I> ".'.r> I ,...4
A.., ,T.II_tk, Z.31'
W"h....."'..,. TrI I.",'h, 1.U
W",luecll"""'n,N...']NI'^",,"go KH
Wc"hLodAv",,,,,l"p(i''''..''''u!lJl,,
ITEA,","~' ']np (;""",Mo fillL.
BI,,,d..fH.S",d;,...,,dIUA>".lWT,ip,..,,.,,,lIo,,lI.,lt'
Av,..,,~,VMT
W,,~~""J "'=~, VMl
Snur<_
I
I'mell"'(\'.1'1
I'lndl"'("".FI
I",,,IS,,,,
r ",.~"
" ~"~
IIIl'Jlll<"lIl"crt:A.''''''''"'
]moLd,.()]h'"'/i;A,,,,,,,""'
f1'f
HI",,,IC<Jl,,,,r1
,I'
ID"';lll",OO
:\()
;:,.:'i
1<).))
1(1(,.")
174.7~
:1I7.M
ExolanatlOn For the LUC 444 trip generation rate, a total of two (2) sites (shown above) were blended with
data from one (I) site in the ITE 6th Edition Handhook to inere<1se the s<lmple "jze nfd<1t<1. The resulting TGR
of 1 06.63 \vas used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Lo.'lioD Si:J,o< I,UOO 0.,. '1'0,.1# # TrlI'L.llJ!:lh TripG.n Tim. Trip r.rr.nrN.w \'MT Snurr.
,n Int.n'lows ]"trrviows Rate Period Len~lh T.],,,
I'mdi",('''.I'L <..6 .~",,"~ ." ". M;'/'! ),.1 I.~' '''.I' ,'1.111 IIJl<l"I,.I'I,,'orl;: ,\,,,~'''"'
1'''011'''(\'.1'1 1111' '" ,') I") ,,, ,",'19 )"-(,, 1.1(1 ','[\ ""..'1 1'l,""r"''''1'o,'I;:,\""'",,.,
]'",n" 1'1 M",."I; ., ,.f,(' WfI K,,,,b.II,,,,,IcA,~~'"''''
],,",],"~ ~ S.6 A..., .T,i ,- Ik, :l.lll
III )u.ll W<i b<od A....",.. T'i ,- W
Day Care Center (ITE LUC 565)
Bk.",Ic,,,,,.J
~.<.(,
W,",h"dl'm"",New'lnp^,'''''~. n.!
W""bL"IAv"",c'ln"(;c"""';""~'"
] I'L A'",,~o 1 "I' (;CLl""'Hfi" HILle
m".d"fl'l_SI"~;"....dJTl'~"""1l,'hil,(.c,...,.",..I",'"
A\,"'!l<V~n
W""],,,," Av",,,~c' VM'I
(PJ<)
'~,:r,
70.117
97.111
11!,j(,
Exolanation: For the LUC 565 trip generation rate, a total of cleven (11) sites from the ITE 71h Edition
Handbook were used to calculate the TGR. This data was not blended with the Florida Studies due to the fact
that the Florida Studies sites were measured per "1.000 sf:" while Collier County charges the impact fee per
"student."
I
Lor.linn I Size (U.d') I D.l<
l~h.I"n<l 1-'1 I.", M",.'X'
I,.wl"" I;IJ
ITJ 4]'
1lIe,,,I'"L,,,..1 5.';.11
I forai ~
]~torvi.""
"
Nursing Home (ITE LUC 620)
IITrrl'LolI~lh I TrillG.n 11m. I Trip
Intorviows Rate Period L..n~lh
'", ; .N" I ],,--4 ~.~"
Aw,. fil I... Ih, 2.~~
\\',ih"d/".",'Tril..nh, 1.$9
"',"~h,",j (',,""... ".. Inl' A\-,",,!O N~.U
Wo;~h"'<lAv,,,,,",ltL)l(;"."~""" RoC<
ITF^\'m~<ln1>G,,"""'''o"RJl!e
Ili,',,~ "fFL~",d;c' oed IT!: A>-".~<hlpG<..,.'I." R,t"
A'"""'W'.VMT
\\ic'l"b'"J^,"m~,VMI
I'or<l'~l N.... I VM1. I
Troll'
"J"
S<lurco
I
(,YJ
,,,,,,'1<"."'1""& A",~"""
: ,~
!.J)
H~
('.'"
'7'
Exnlanation: Forthe LUC 620 trip generation rate, a total of one (I) site (sho\>vn above) V.ias blended with
data -from five (5) sites in the lTE ih Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting
TGR of2.48 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
General Office Building (ITE LUC 710)
Loc.li,," Si:Jk(l.U(I(I Do.. TOlal# # Trill Lrngrh 1ril'C.n Tlmrr"rind '11'il' Pe,r.mNe" Tril" \'MT Smn',.
,n Illte,",'iow. Int.rvi.w. R.l< Lrn~lh
-',,"~'L,,(', >c 14-' Jun,'),] " " M,N~ lUll ';".4! ,,,,,,.,,,,(,,,,,,,,,
(;w"""'''(',, (.A ')'.1' J),-,.,n ..,,' '."" ",""S""""
(.""""",,(',, (.A 1"1.11 rh'_'ll 'fl' ,'Xl '''"",-'mm''
1''''<11",('" H In.11 IJ".~~ 4:'1 'No IH~ i".', (,.)(1 '"I." "",'~ I ""\,I<-Illi,,,,/i; .~"".",,,,
" I'<.,,~ "",,, " :','.K "'r'") "II ;7~ 7,0-.<' H(I 041> J"""k.nli'l"'&A"<~'"'L~
1""'1'",,.- '-1.- ""., .Trl " 'lh, U"
\\'<; Ior,..!A..,...'<hl 1.....((" 5,1~
\"',~h',-'<lI'",'","Nc'" l!JllAH"'~" '!C.'
W";~h,,,IA,'~',,,, ID.,4
11.,:(1
".,,,,,,,VMT ";.1:
W,-"hlc..Jh",-,,,",'V\n c,I:'(,
Exnlanation: For LUC 7i 0, TGR was dctennincd using ine trip rale equation found in the ITE ii' Edition
Handbook. FL Studies data was used to calculate the trip length and percent new irips only.
Tindale-Olivcr & Associates., fnc.
February 2009
A-5
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
/\oenda ~tefll No. 170
~ ~\.1arch 10. 2009
"o:ge 67 of 113
1.(I<a[;on S1I.<(I,II(I(I D.le lotal# ~ Trip L.nlrth Tril'G<n Time TrIp P."ont ,- \'MT So"r..
" Inlor.i."" 1"[."'1..., R.[e P.rlod L<n~th Trip.
1.01 I'L M,,,."" .. " 'dOl 1'J" """"ic"'_II"",I.c^,,,,,",,O'
1',10.. II"d"L 1'1 14.^ """~ H" n " ~~ ",.~ (,I" ".I' 101,.17 I ,"<hII,.OI",'" & ^",""''''
" l'ol"'O"".I'L N",,_~~ " ...-.. !I' ~71U ',"_4 UI' "p, 11""lc.lllovcr/t^'"""""
IIcm'l"cl"C" II '" M",_~(, "~I ,,, l~.~l 'J".' (,47 ,".-' II,'I\<; Im",II"OI1\'cr"-^,""",,,,,
11,",,,,,1,,(,,,.1'1 ,,,, M,,'-''', :'I! ,"" 4'J" '11.-' ,,'If. 'J'> ,>eM 1"""!,_OI"'<TI<^,,,,,',,,,,,
n""",,,(',, 1'1 II." ",,_~7 <' 4"'" ",,-'., 1.1,1< ~:.I ""1.07 lill~",,'.nIL\'" .ll""~,,,,<,
('i,,,,I,,,,,,(','..FI "'" '-'01-"7 , "r, " nil ,,,,_\, 'I,"~ ~u. '" '" I'mdolc.OI",,,/<-',,,,,,,,,o,
(,1"",,,,,,(,,, H ,,,.. "c',."1 , '2' '"". ""-.' n" ".' '''%~ I",J,J("-'"'VlT& ^,~""",.,
""TU,C" n ".9 (m"" 1(., 1;l!, ,_r, ',",I HI ,1.1.1" l"ulilk.(lJ"'~'/<A"",,,,o'
C"m,C" 1'1 Ill." N"".H' .141J ~" ..'1, ,."'ll 1,.:11 'Jc' "", I "",.k-O)ln'or& -""~",,,
(',m"I", FI " 1>0""" ." N)^ '-', .'" 'J'.: "1(,7,. l,"""I,.O!n',,"^""''''''
I ",.1 S".. C'4..1 .....r. '" .- .., ~J17
Il[ W.;-.....A..ra T.i ~. .h, '"
Medical-Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720)
HI""JoJ"",,]
v.'''""'"ul'"",""N",'lnp^''''''1'
~l<.9
\'-"""';"1'(;"""""""1;,,,"
;IL""'~"I'O'lllp(,,~m","'lull' ."'.1)
l'k"d"fFI.'''d;<,."d,.n:A"",~,'hip("...<,"",,"n.,,: ),_9$
^'.,~,,!,VMI 1'-'<.51
\\'<Ic'],,,<lA,c",,,,' VM] ':~
ExnJanation: For the LUC 720 trip generation rate, a totill often (10) sites lshov,'n ilbove) werc blended with
data from ten (10) sites in the ITE th Edition Hilndbook to incrcilse the silmple sizc of data. The resulting
TGR of 35.95 was used in calculating the transportution impact fee rate.
Localion 5i/dl,OOO D:u.
sf)
..H,,,'("', 1'1 " , M"v.'J'J
, "11",(',, FI ,,'," M",,_'J'J
.11,,,,(', n ClI.1 Mr,,-'",
1",,1"'0 ,~'.! '"",.
lIE ':'1""'1) ~'.IW.
1<I"",k,',,'.1 _"_'6)
Business
laml # # Trip L.n~~h
Imrn';."" In1Cn'i~\,.,
"oj
"4'
iI."
-VI '.'
-'....'.TriLeo'h: 4.9t1
'h'i"htod,\,." hi I"," ,b: 5J~
\\'''~I''', "m""' N",
r.ro,'n'N,'"
Tr;I"
nIT
Souree
".'1<
" "~
"'),
,'}'J4
1 ""I,,,,-()[,,'c""-',,,,
ILTI,\,,,"_OI"',,I<^,,,,,,,,'"
'",Jo,I<.{lI"'",I<^"",,,,,c'
rll'.""c"",'I"p(.e"omll,"'u""
""',,",,11-'1 ,,,,<!;,.,.,,,I IlT.-\'ua.,.'hip"'"<'."'" n."
A,c~,,""VMI
\\'."'''"'liM<r,,,,'\'M'
12.'1,
Il.~i
-(",'I'
''''
EX1}lanatioll: For the LUC 770 trip gencmtiun rule, a tutal of three (3) ~ites (shuwn ahovc) v,'ere blended with
data frum titken (15) sites in the ITE ill Edition Hilndhook to incrcusc the sample Slze of Jata, The resulting
TGR of 12.98 \\as used ill caiculating ihe irilllsportmion impact fee rate.
I
Specialty Retail Center (ITE LUC 814)
Loc,,'ion
I Si,_,._:~,UIIIJI
.. I TOIOI#
,,".
Im.n'lo'"
M""_'!'J
M"..~'J
?J.I~,
# Tei[l L<.n~ll, IT'i!' Gon I Ti~.. I Trip
Inlo""""', Roto I ]'onod I l.<"~lh
1';1" ,,,_I,, '10
I ~' -", ,",_I, ~ .'~
A_o.-" .- Trl 1.<" 010: 1.~7
W,j.lo.odA<'",. h l....".k: Ul
"'CI~llI'o I'.""", N,... I "I' ^",~,,~o ".,'
Wmb",I^,."""""lnl'(;"U"",,,,,,I(,,,
]1" ",',.",,0'1,,1"""''''''''''' ~,"
Ilk""..,,,, ""''''''"Orn'''''.''"'''''pl;,.."'"",,,u..,,
AH",,~,'V~I]
W"~J"c'''A'''''1c'\''11
1"",.I"(,I"'orl>.^,,,,,,,,,",
1,",',k'-<"""'r&^"",'''''O\
("11,,",(',, H :'.11
"IL,,,",, " ,
]"'" '''0 "..,
III' IOIHI
Illc-",ho, ,,,,,,I 1:_.0
14',
I'oro.,":";."I I
\'MT
Tell"
".n .'H"
'4' "''-''',
Source
"'CI'
H',
.....
IF7I
","
Explanation: For the LUC 814 trip genl.::ratiull rule, a total (\ftwu (2) siles (shown ao(wc) were blended v.'ith
data from four (4) sites in the ITE ih Edition Handhook to increase the sample size of dilta. The resulting
TGR of49.99 W;JS used in caku]ating the trunsportation impact fee rate.
Tindale-OJiver & Associates_ Ine
February 2009
A-6
Collier County
Transportation Impact fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 63 of 113
LOCal;"n S....<(l.OOII """ T"lal# # Tril'L<III-'1h Trll,Gon 1i.....r.riorl l'rlp r.",.nl'l;",,'Trlp, VMT Sou....
" ]nt.n';.wl ]nlo"''''$ """ L<nlrth
I""'I"'.H M"'-~ti j,7 "" (,,,II Kmol,.,...II,""/i.A"~,,,",,,,
1""",,)-'1 M".~I. 171' 1.111 ",",I,'V-Il,""&A'~"lI1"~
,,- 1'1. M",_~(. J." !(f! "dO Kn"'c~'II"",&A.."",,,,,,
1""'1"'.1'1. ME,,-~6 ". '.~II 1Un0k.,...lklfll&A.~"""c~
S, ""- I'I 1.1')'.1l ^,",.H'J J~4 1~~ 11".7 '-60 ",n IlEld"Ic,(lI""~/i.I\""~..,,,,
S1. I~,,-,,,",,,~. 1'1 P') Sop.-~~ 4m '" 77.m' 11".7 I.~I> ~!JI :20..'1 1"",k'OlW"1'ItA""",,,,,,,
1"0",,1-1 4'.'.n ^"J'H'J 1</1 I:W 11,.7) H" 1.'10 lj,(1 4r;,11 1.11l",,",fllfi'c~&A"""'''L'''
l->ImOOm.,1 ~n-' So ,.~9 176 ,Ill ~I 4~ '...; 1.41l J(,.I1 %.m 1'.,<loHI'....".&A'.'..""'o,
l'II,oU"l'orlFL (',,".Il S, ,_~~ ~~,' 1~~ ',,,. .',1(1 ~" (f Im""I,-OI~'"&A!~.,,,,',,,
S","m"lo.FL 41.1.1' ();;,.;:~ (;14 .'~(, ,7.(1 TmllJ,k'Oh,,,lt-A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
1I,1l,1>.,"" h('".I.' IJ..I' J,,'.~I 1.110 140 In..ok-()I"..IJ:.^",,,",,,,,
IILII,tx,,,," h{'''.rl. ,jl.ll 111'-~1 1.111 7.l." r",dJok'(~"'"&A.<~''1n'''''
('<.I",~C". FI A"",')I I" M ~J' 'HI (1.(~, lm..Jc-OI",oTIJ:.A...,"",,,,.
{'"lb",('''.I,' A,,".~I ]1;: I." ].04 J4.11 OWl j",",Jc-Ohv"&^""",i",,,
,""""wcI"r1>d<'''''''.''l !'~'." sc.n 'w I ~.< l:',"(, f,Lf, 1:".'(;""""""" iI'~,,"".'.I,,"
(l~".,.l-l I ~J.4 s<>'n JI~' IV: ;"".,,, (..I.n ,,0,,1"'","","'0 ^''''',"'''.hl<
(;"''",....,('" (;A '~J,I I"'..~] .(,.illI '':1> 'Ii.!> lw.r\4 SlY,,,,,,",,,",
(;wn"....'{" (.A '14.7 [)",.-.91 ~1 (]I' ~..<IO ~4.0 ,~; " S"""Smnn,
S,~"."",,-, R '11u' )W1'~) j. '" ]', " ).111 S"""""C,,,,","
"IT""""(''' " I ~f,.1 ),.,-')) 'c' " .'I.S' :.~IO S,,,,,,,,,C,,.",
S,""",,,,,(,-, " IS).' h",-~' " " 1'17~ '.411 """'"'' (\,,,.
S'IT"~''''( " 1')1.11 J,,"-~) (" (,J (,q~ ~.91; """.<Ol,('""my
II"Mlld"{',, " H').~ M"....W. '" .1)] 71.t\ll ",~ 4.U ;"-' 1~7."-.< 1"""I,'OI~'",& ,~,.,,'''O,
('1"".,,,,.(',, 1'1 "n, (I",_~l 7'.__~1 ~""P 1)11> '71 7.'..'>f> Im,"ol,~)liv"&A<~""",,,
[',,,,,.,.,,,.(',, " I"I.~ riel-"' 7J.fll ., :41' '"" ",','17 ImJnlc.()Ii,'''& ^'~'c'''''''
C1"JM"('" 1-'1 Oil On-'" 41.111 ~,,_3 , 271' -'I.~ (11.I1< Im,",k-l)h,,,&A,~,,,,,~~
1.""(',, H "'.~ ^I..H! ,'Ii '" 111:.(,(> 1,1(1 111 '''.1' li1o""k'()II\'",'&A'~lC"Jll'"
1"..,('" 1'1 11.1 Ap,.~11 '" '1(, 1,',111 '-.\11 ;'J.(I Jl;')l 1",1IJ,IM1!iv"kA''''':1J'1<:'
""",,,(,, 1'1 (,'(, ^",~I: ,'J 14j.M "'..'r 1M, "''-~ ~%, li1,dJolc'-l)li\'"&A,~"",,
IM'''C" H ".'.' ^,"~" 114 JHB 'M_.'I' ,J(' ,u \'j' li1"",k.()I~'"&A<~,,,,,'"
(.om,('<' 1,'( ,"'.U De,.II' 'N4 ".>i-l '''-' ,.411 "., ",,,, 1,""""'-OI1\',,&A,~,,",,..
("""(',, " ," , N"v~'-' ,,~, ""--~, ,,,.(, IN> "." 7".'7 T",",k_()I""~&A,~,,,",,,,
"'''m''",.MT '''4.1 Il<~.(l(, '.'~ .~~ 4(,,9(, '.1j ...' "I" I'i","""nl,,,,,..,,,^.,,",",,,,,,
I~""",u,. "II ,-,~ <; 1J<~.l", ~(), .~;) <;64') I..'" "" ".l" 1",,",,<'Oj,,,,,,&A,,,,"",,,,,
1~,1C"""" M' \' .~ 1~~_Il(. '!" 1l'J (",III I.)~ 7411 '1.1, 1;"",1(-0'",,,,,, ^,~"""c~
l;'lJIl',,,. .'.".17,\ ^.. .Tri ,.. 'h: l,M )2.;
Iloj hOo<IA..... ,Tn " 'h: J.n"
Shopping Center (ITE LUC 820)
Im.1 W"I,""~I'",'"" N,,, Inp^",,'"" 7\f~
W"!'Il'CTI^",,"~,,'I"p(;"t1""""'"I<o''' ,<~.'G
II'EA<<,"," 1,,1";""'"""''' R""" 41,~4
)--;,,\C. (;""1''' ,,",I"~'nJ, trip 1c1l~LI ,,'-,5(; "''', "Ii",,,"d h" I""" ,,,,Iud"; '-"'0" w",~dL1d""""'"e"',' 1,,,~'hc.I,,.J"L,.... ^\'","~"VMl %.41
W,,,!I,',d^,,,,,,~,,V\n l'lWl
EXDlanation: For LUC .'\20, TGR was det(''TIJ1incd using the trip rate equation found in the lTE ih Edition
Handbook. Trip length and percent nev.... trips are based on a Florida Cun'c analysis using the studies listed
above.
New Car Sales (ITE LUC 841)
"."",..,01,,,,,.1'1
n,,,,,,,,,,",-FI
len"I,,,,
,"
~I,"J,J:"',,'
:),
I'crr~nt N...
Trip.
7'1"
7~.I'
YMT
SourtC
"
Toml#
Im~,",'I~w.
1'1
no
#Tripl....ngth
ImITy;rwl
I(~.
Trip
Lr.~'1b
'I".." ,7"
!~4f1 ""'.', OIJ
A"" ,'hi LnI1h, ~.1;11
W htnilA,... "Td !..nth: .,1;11
W.o,I""II'<,,),,"I'," ;"1,1\"","", '",
W,,~I"o>I^"""!'T"ll(;e"""'"'' I"M
111'. A\'","~< 'riv (i"","""" KIIo<
l'I,'''d"I~I,~''d...".."nE^'''''''lI,'h;p(;'''''''I;".R.,.,
AvmgoVM'1
W,,~il'ed A"",." VM'I
I<':'.I'J
"",k,Ii;,','" "-A",~,,,,<,
"",,~Ie.()I'''''t& ^.,,'~"'''"
"
J)'
N",c Iho~""""".'I,, ..I ,,"'," r",'Ir",,,,J,,,;,,,h,(,w,,'''"~'m,,1 Li, ,J.e,,,,,,.,'H('b,,',,,I,,, I,~";"",,,,,,,(;,,",, ['""I I ""il,,,.
!'J41l
."..14
32,93
IlI.'.l~
11>')1
ExnlanatJOn Forthe LUC 84] trip gcncration rate, a total of one (!) site (shown above) was blended with
data from eleven (II) sites in the ITE th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. Thc resulting
TGR of 32.93 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Supermarket (ITE LUC 850)
Tol~1 #
# Trip Lcn~th
]ntorviewl
Por<<IItN.,,'
Tril"
.<f,.('
H-IT
Sonrce
16'
("
Time Trip
r.rio~ L.n~lh
H!(,.,f, ~,,_4, ,.I"
....."" '. Trl until, VIR
\\'d~h"d ""0'" o'h I",".., 2,~N
W"'~""" 1'''''<11' New 'IriI'Mc-r,,~c <{..I'
We"I",,, ",.-"..,,, Inp(;""",""" I~,,,,
III ^,.";,,,' Inp("~CT'"'''''' R,,,,,
)lk"d,IFJ.'i'"d;e"oodln:'-"""o<.'l,;"(;,""",h,,,,l<..,,
^""",""VM'I
W"r""'<i.hor.,,,"MI
,"'.;"
""""'-''''''CT 1<^'~""J1''''
Intcniow,
""'-)"
10,,4
1".l_lK
I".'.n
'''U,
EXDlanatlOn For the LUC 850 trip generation rate, a total of onc (I) site (sl1o\\'n above) \vas blended with
data from four (4) sites in the ITE ill Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting
I'GR of I U3.3~ W<:lS used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
A-7
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fec Update Study
/,genda Item fIb. 17D
f\1arch 10. 20D9
Page 69 of 113
Loc.tian ~i,.<(I.IIUII 1)01. lnlal# ~ T,ip L""\ltb Trip G." Tin.. Trip Porcenl N.,,' V.\H Sourr.
.0 lnlcrvicw$ liller_lows RalO Pul"" Lon~th Trips
","",.1'1 M,,_,(, "" 1.111 K....lo,"-li,,", "-A"""',,,",
1.11""'."] ~,'I ,"V.', I" '" 1,'4.K<I UP ,"" :' I ~."" ] ",d.k_"h"" I<: A'~""""
('I""~v",,, H A",,_>"J ." M I,'Ii'.I<f> '-'" c'." ,9H) Im,t,',o.llll\'~'& ^<~"""<'
('I",,,,",,,,, Fl. 2.] "",..X') Il' .'<, r;.'.'.l' l4]" I.(,(l '50 ".'." 1,,,",lc,OI,,,,,,"'^,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"'u""n('o.l'l j,ll'-')] ," " "'.!L> 4Kh" 1,'1 ll" .','c.i<l f"'''']'''"l1','''''A'',,'m'O"'
M""",,I'''.rl j"".'JI " ." '" ,~, '"'m 11.7' ,",0 ",1-") 1""Inl<'O]",,,,,,, A",,,,,,,,,
r'"I"",(".1.1 ^"",~: ,,(, v, :.~) :,'1 1...".;"-011\'''/0:. ^'''~'''L''
('"I],o'("'.I'L ALl,.'11 14,' " , "" I "cU,Ic..()I"'et & A"""\",,,
,:"''",,,, I',\ (;A '" 1:..-1'.11<'" 2)" .j~ 10 '"'''' '"",n,
(;w"""uCo.(;^ ',' 1;';'.1"" 'lIo S,""'"",,",
'j,",I-,,,~ ", "" " ... 1.11
1"",I-,;",W"I'I"<d ]'.1 W h............ I'd ... ."
".,
Convenience Market. 24hrs. (ITE LUG 851)
rrE
IlJ""!cUL,,,,1
,
.'"
W'"1hledl_="LN,... In,'A'<ro~<
.',J
\'.',,,]
aCT"",,,I",,e
"r''''
ITI An'"",'jn"I;."e""""'~,,, -"'j';
II!..,," ,I 1-l...""I.....d IH ,h",..<h;pr",..,..;". 1\..., ,,,.]~
A,'"",,~, VMl ":'''4
W'""','<dA"m~,nfl .1.",'(
EXDlanation; For the LUC ~51 trip generation rate, a total of five (5) sites (shown above) v,'ere blended with
data from eight (8) sites in the ITE th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting
TGR of 719.18 was used in calculating the transportation imp<lr.;t fee r3te.
l.ora1ion Si/..(l,llllli Date Tmal# #TrlpL.nU1h TriI'GC" Time Trip ron'O"! :>i'I<' VMT Source
.0 Intrn'ifW, Inlon'i,',., Ralo PerIod u.ltJ.'tb T.-il"
]","",.1,'1 M",.>(, ;.,"' K'ml,','.]I"m"-A,~",,"),,,
M,~""Cp H , , )",,-"1 '. .\.;HI" :4" "'I !1,<1 I!I.-," 1",,",,<,,-,1,,'"'' ^'~"t;ll"'
~I"""" (, 1'1 , , J'HI.~! 1,(, ., '''''ii' :,~. , C' " , Ill', ~, IlJl<I,"'.OI,,'," "A,~''''"'<'
~I""", C'" 1'1 H ),,,,.~p .. .. ."(,,, 4""., , !'", 1.'ll.i ''''<'''''-''''''<'''A,~",,''"'
, "11,",('(,.1'1 AIl,'-'JI % " , '" "~,I, 1""L""'-(']n',,/o:.A'''~'U''o.
('"ik,('".1'l A,,,.~I .. C " 1.<11, ''I' 1""I,<i,'.'li,,'., Ie A""",,,,,
""11"' 1'1 , 1"'0'-1.<"" "~ill ,,,(, " C I ,,,,bi,',()[,,,, Ie A',,~,,"<'
Llic-'''''''.1-1 ] "',,> ~1,"" " " ~-ll" ,''1(, '" I ",.I.1"."\ltI,," "A",~"""'
L",,,, 1'1 .. " Ir.I].Y ", "I" " J'" !m,t".'<)I,,,,~,,, A ",,''"'0<
1,"" "" C , ';1. .~.. ,hi ... "Ie Ul
!'II '''J! ~" WoI.b1,dA".". cTn I"," .. 1_~7
An.. ,,'hi,l.m.lkIC..m"H 1,1.'
Jla,,,Ic, "",,1 " .' W<'l"lI"O I'<"'"L N,,,, I"".~.-,"",!".
Service Station w/Gonvenience Market (JTE LUG 853)
11'11" ;,.,,,,;,,,,.,, ]""" "'" <,,,,, I"'.) .'~c {,(I
Explanation: For LUC 853, <l tolal often (10) sikS from the ITE th Edition H<lndbook were used to calculate
the trip generation rate. This data was 110t blended with the FL Studies due to the f<let that the FL Studies sites
were measured per "1 ,000 sf:" while Collier County charges the impact fee per "fuel position."
Lor.1ion S;"'(l.nnn nut. TN"I# # Tdl' Lo"~lh TrlpG.n Tim. Trill r.n.n! N." ~'Ml Sourer
.0 InlrTVir,," Inl,rd,,,', R.le Poriod unUlh Trill'
1'"".,('" , il.1 A"_O, I''; " ^,' ~1 Ct', "'.. .'11 I Lnd"i, 'Jm'.'" A,,'~""'"
I',,,",,,,',, " ^".," : I ~ '", I ~, " ~ ". ".' II'~ 7'1 1",d"I,.r"m,i<A",~,.""
1',,,,,,,(',, H. I.'.] ^ _If, II ')~ q 'J1 ~(, . C, '<1 "", l",d"lc."',,',~& ,\'''~'m''
1""""., ',., Avo, .1'" ... ",c :M
I'll 11',1 ~''''A><,,!<hi ... ., ,..
Pharmacy/Drugstore with and without Drive.Through Window (ITE LUC 880 & 881)
""""",1.",,,1
W"~I"""I"r,~m ~". l"I,A"""'i"
,\"".,,,,.1,,,,(;,",<,,,,,,,,,,,,,< IC".<"
11'1 .~","~,. 1 "r ,","e,,,",,,, Ie"" >>.1 b
"k,~"f H 'o"!i,, "",I rn ,\""",,'ldp """""'"" Il".., \~.~S
A,''''''' nil -1.5"
W<""'<'!'~"""1<nl'l 1,,'1
Expl31l<ltlon For the LUC 880/881 trip generation rate, <I total oftllfce (.1) sites (shown above) were blended
WIth data from ninc (9) sites in the ITE th Edition Handbook to increase lhe sample sill' ufdata. The
resulting TGR of92.g8 v.,"as used in calculating tbe transportation impact fee rate.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
A-8
Cnl1ier COllnty
Transportation Impact fee Update Study
Agenda Item r~o. 170
March 10, 2009
?age 70 of 113
Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890) - Including Collier County Studies
locatioJl Si/.e(],Ollll Oate Tolol# # Tril' L<n~lh TripGen Time l"rip P.rl"<ntr\... VMT Soure.
.0 Inton'lo.., Imor,'lo.., Rate P.riod L.n~lh Trl!>>
,,, ,.1'1 I<;.U 1!1'-'(I,'): ,,, " u-' ~', , 'I,,,,",i,_()h,,,,.&,,,,,~,,,".
I'm ,,,1'1. tI;.~ Jul_~: "~ J~ '.1" 5.'-7 I'md,I".OI"..& ",,"""",
I'n",,,",,tl,,,,,,-FI .'~.< 'm,-I'" " 14<> .'.71' ~,-(, _,1' ~'J,: 11,'1 i'i""""(;n,",-('"Ih,,(,,,,",,
S'uJ,r..FL 1I01l.!> Jw,_Hf, ]'J~ I ~4 ".."] ~,-I, ).14 "1.4 20.41 N"""" (,",,,, (',"10,1'( ..",I>
1l,~"H.o"", n i'J.I Itll,.I\<', I~' 1'], I]."" 9,.(, ".1" 7.1"< 4,'J{, N""",~(,w" ("11".,(",,",,
1"""'<;"-" ~''J.' ... ,.T.; ,- 4.7~
1'7,6 W.I b1<>dAv... ,1'. ~ ., ."
en
J1k",k,j",,,1
,~
I,"""
W<,~I>"dl'o'''''"LN,",' InpA""'''~' ,'-'
A"",,,,Tnp(,o,oru';,,,,R,"
I'IE"""",oTf1I'(it'll,""i,,,k,"
Bk,"d..fR~'''d;".''''ln:"....~,'lr;p';.''.r"ti""I<"t<:
"v""1,VMl
\\'",h'c"A,'CJ.~' \'~n
6.06
.'.11',
5.13
c~, 1 ~
iU~
EXD1:mation: For the LUC 890 trip generation iatc, a total of three (3) sites (shown above) w~re blended with
data from thirteen (13) sites in the ITE 7tl1 Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data, TIle resulting
TOR of 5.23 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate.
Drive-In Bank (rTE LUC 912)
Loudon .%.0(1.1111(1 V.,. "h13IN N Trip Lon~lh Trll'Geo Timo Trl]> P<rC~n1 r\~.. VM"r SOU".
.0 ]mo""i~,,, ]nlo"ie"l l{al. Porlod L.n~tl, 'I'r;I"
];,,\1".1'1 ",,,-,(, " ).'1' t,:,",;"'.lh'm,, ",,"',,'"'
I"" ",1'1 M",'.~" !II '4.1' t,:tml"v.lhm,,,,A,,,,,,,,"\
Cle.,,,,,,',",F1 1>.1 .~",-") '" ." 'h,-I" .'.2<> ".... ',",101"011''''&''''''';''''
1,""".F1 ,n s< "' [1'i '" , '" 7'." 1",",1..01;",." A",,,,,,,,,,
\"""..d,.f1 45 ')cH~ 1 on,jnic-Oi;,',,'.k A,,,,,,,,,,,
M"",,,,'-' H . Im'.~' ',~ ." )'lIlf ].1' 4,,, Im,bl,'(J]",~.&""",,,,,,,,
1.1""''''('''.1'1 ).1 1""8' .- ]41" 1.7, "'.1 1",~,I,.(Jh""&A,,,~",,""
M,,",'n('".1'1 )'d,"1 j7 )(, N", c,'" 4~-', l,ml"k'Oi;",~& "",,,,,,,,,
("II"",'" 1'1 "",'.~I 1(,] "' ,4b, 'I ~~ .<li.' Imd"Ic.();;",~& A,,,,,,,,,,,
("11",,,(,,,.1'1 ^",.'JI 'CO " I, ,~ 4(,,(, 1""I"k,(jI;",~& ",""""<,
('"II",,!',', 1'1 '\Il"'~' 14, '" 2.<" 41', I,"(",I,-()h"c~& A"""HI1<'
tLen",,"I,,('''.I'L '.' ~I",.')' '''1 " 'h,.(" 2" J4.7 I ,"""I,'()I1<'.' & A",,,,,,,,,,
M""",,(, 1-'1 " .,,,"1': '" ,41" (.'; '4.(, """1"..],,,,,,,,- ",~,,""o"
M,,,,,,"(', 1'1 '"',.".'1: '<' ,'4("", :4", ,-", "",.' ,".'." ~'ml,"-II,"~,,- ,~,,,,,,",,.,
I"",:S,,, 2.;" Avo,.. ,Tn l~n .tb, D8
ITI ill' ;I,!! W "''''Av.," ", ,." th: H6
""",<",,1'.."1
4".2
\\'"'1"".11'"",,, N,~' IMI,A',,,,".,,, 4l-.~
W"""\c,i""<'li1,'lripG,",,o1l"'" K,,,,
ITI,~II'I'd";,'''A'mp<lnl'(i'''m1r''n''''..
nk.d"fF\.~,"d;".""dln:..hm,.,Tr;"",",,",l<..R...:
,41,N,
IYI'
I.'n.
ExnlanatlOn For the LUC 91 2 trip generation rate, a total of one (1) site (shown above) was hlended \vith
data from seven (7) sites in the ITE gfll Edition HUlldbook to increase the sample size ofd<-lta. The resulting
TGR of 159.34 was used in calculating the translxmation impact fee rate.
Quality Restaurant (rTE LUC 931)
Loc.,;on Si,d1.tillll lJ~t. 1 ot.1 ~ ~ Trip I.."~t;; Tr!pCrn Tim. Trip ]'oJ'{rnlNr,,' \'MT SOltrrC
.0 In"rvlew. Infrnlow. Hat. l'oriod L.n~lb Trilll
h""p;,.rL M,,"~~ 11, ,. c.II' 'c.n t,:""h.I'"m",A,~'"'"''''
,;< 1'",",h,,,,.1'I o,,'_~'J m 1;4 1],,-',,1'-' 151\ '7.(1 ['m(~,I<."lt\,,, It A",,,,,,,,,,,
(""""',1"~.Il. '-'I ,,,,-." r,p ., 11'1,(,' 10,,-!,."-' 2'" (,7H 'i>''< '''''\'''''.01""",, A",~"",,,
I""IS,," ".' ~.I, ,\..,.. '" ~ th, UU
11'[ l:5i' 'II'". ""~M" "Tr' ,.. tb, l.l~
TlI",,,,,,I,,,,,,i
L'r:.j
W",i,'<,II',""'c,uNc....lnp"""."" ",
ITE"""'"." .11J])(ic",~,,'''''"I(m''(jl''r'''''1
"""
Exnlanation: For LUC 931, a total of cleven (1 I) sites from the ITE 7th Edition Handbook were used to
cuIculate the trip generation rate. This data was not hlended with the Florida Studies because the Florida
Studies usc "I ,000 sf' as the measurement unit, lA'hilc Collier County charges the impact fce per "scat."
Sil<(J.lIIU) r"lal#,1 U Trip L<,,~t1' Trl"Gc" Tin'. Irll' P"rcc", r<<."
loraliun .0 nat~ Inton'i,'w. ]nton;ow, R"I. Porio~ Un~th Trip. Hn S"ur,.
I'<~"m<l,'( " 1'1 ,; ~ M",~''', ,42 ,)' I" ~'I 'IHio ~. 'I, 72,' '7-'.IH Im,",k'O,,,.o, & ",~~"""
IIem",,,I,,",, FI " MH_')(, 1.'4 , '0271 """;0 -.1' ",.~ !",-" 1...".1<"""''''-&.'''''"''''''''
S, 1'0""10,,, 1-'] <(\ """~ " , (" ",I<, IPo_1, 'Iii' 'J,.I' c.I' ')~ 1,",",k,Oln',,'&.'''''''''"''
1\<11""'11(-''''',1-'1 " del_"; :.'(, ;1/, 1.'7 .~, 4.7", " ,,, - 1,.(, ::O.W Im",.le.(",,'er& A,~,,'''''o,
",,,,,1,, '''' . .\ ".,,~ '" , " ,:,., ""-(," .. 1'12 :.1I,.N! ]i'l<"I<,Oi",oc/i """.""",
1'"""1,, " " ""'_1>1 'nr, ',," ,,'," "" '," "0'1 rcl' ".1--1 .c ~ r",,",k_O ,.,.;.& A",~;;,,<,
I'""" (,',,1'1 .'>. ""'-'>' I", , "" "1(,'J7 ,,,.r,, 'A" "'." ,',r 1,,,,"II,,'.'iH""& """."""
,,,",",," ': " -boo'" .Tr' I.,,, th: ~.,,'
nT, Woi_b""'''"," 0"1'";,1,,," tit, l.l7
1JI""k-.J,,,,,1 W"'l'I,,",II'<rn,",N,.w 1"1'^"cm~" 'II,~
High-Turnover Restaurant (ITE LUC 932)
""".. ''''''',,' 1', .'<" "", ~ "".I u,",,~ ,,, ,," ,,,,,,m "'" ,,',,'" ",,'
1"J>(;,,,~.,,Lj.,,, 1~""\I"rs(',")
4.0'
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
February 2009
A-9
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
/\genda :t9m No. 17D
March 10.2009
Page 71 of 113
Exnlanation: For LUC 932. a total of two (2) sites from the ITE ih Edition Handbook v.'ere used to calculate
the trip generation ratc. 111is data \\'as not blended with the Florida Studies because the Florida Studies use
"] ,000 sf" as the measurement unit, while Collier County charges the impact fee per "seat."
Location Sizo(1,lIlHI nOl. To,.1 ~ . ltip L<R~'h TelpGCR Tin,,' hil' r<rronl r-;<w \'MT Sou..o
'0 IRlOe"i"". I"'<n;.,,,, nal" Por;orl LCIl"th Tri",
1""".1'1 M,,'.W, ,,' Ku"j[,,'.llnn'I'-A"""i"'"
1;,",",.1'1 M",'-'(, 'I" (.;" K""k".Ih'n'I<A,~",..,,~
1''"011.,.,.".1'1 .. .~",.," " l",," 1:.-, " "i.n '1\.1." ILLHIJdc'_Ol"'''&^'','",,'e'
I'moll',{';'.n ~W I"'.~~ 'l(. , '(,II W,4(' , OJ,,' "" '7.1J 'I,.'," ILLl<l"I,.Oi"'",&^",;",,,o'
,,, ",,' TIO' 1-'1 ( ".,.~" ... II.' '''.' "" 1"J' 1,",1.-11, 01.'.''''& ",,,,,.~,,,,,,
'1"","(, FL I.or' Ju,,"' ", 'J(,>;L' """ "'Il '.. ~I", '" 1",""Ic-.L'lwe,,,^,,,,,,,..,,
'1""",,(', 1'1 '-'" J",,_YI )~ ", (,~".Il1> "'"" , .. (,I WI"" I,o;bk_OIw,"&A"",'lJI'"
('"11",,(,, 1'1 ~,,".~I " " '"' (,(," '"""Jeo,(lI"'",I<"",~,,,,,"
I'"II"'(".FI A,,"_"! II ~ .j(' " ,,~ r"""J,."I"',"&"",,,,",",
Ikm"Ll""('''.FI .q' M,,"~" 1'(, '" "' 'J".f,,, , (" M, '1.\:7 1""I,j,-.nltl.",ItA'''':lJI1<'
11""'JlTI""(" " " '1",-,,,. II,' " q'" 'Jr.-I," '.'" J" <>,,~ 1,",I"Jeo,!)III''''& ^'"'~""",
I~'d". " '.'f, ^,,,',IlI ,,'- , "4.11' :.\" "4.0 ; ,~, " 1IL,<I"I,',()j,,,,~,, A,~,,,',.,,,
J"h''', n '.l" ^>e.CJI " ,,' f,'''';" " ," L ,'~, ,. ]""bl,'_'lb"," & ^",~',"'"
I",c" n ,,,, " ,.1'1 ," , 1'- 'l"f "" ,," "(,l~ ''''el"lo.I>I",,, I< ^,~",u""
1'"""(',, H '.f,I, " ,.11, il'" "', :~'. " .,,,.,,, ", ""r> (.(".1<' 1",\,Ic'_O!"'''&A'',,,'''"''
1'""...,(-" 1'1 '<;1.- A>r.IJ: ~<I, ,r,.' '1;.1: "" " :7, ..' , ,'n IlTIc\,I,'(lI"" I< A"",,,,,,,
1'"",,(, H '41 A",_I" ",' "'J.1' 'J,,_(,' , "" 71 , , I(I),.~', 1""lald'I"',,~'A,"~'''"''
""" "" '".~ ........ ,hi 1~" 'b: 1.~2
lIE (,1.1' "' k,<<J",or. " ''" I.: US
Fast Food Restaurant wiD rive Thru (ITE lUC 934)
Bk'U<i""""lII HI:.,
\\'''1",",,1'",,'''''''''' I",,^"m~, .'7.9
W"~I",JA"",,,",h,,.(;",,,,,,r>,,,, 1(""
In^"",""'lm";""c',"""n"",,
""""..1 1'1"".d."""d IH:,',,,,,..hll,(;o,,o,,,,,,,,II...JO'
,\ "<r,,~, VM ,
\\'",ILlc',I^",~",,'I'''1
.',",,(,
'%.Il
,nil
7(" I ~
/1",,1'1.0,,1"""'''1 '".1>
"",,,I',,,,I''',",c'''<L<J, LI"" "~I",blm1h,. 11,,,1,,,1,,,,,,
(,~(II"
Exnlanation: For the LlIC 934 trip generation rate. a total oft\vc1\'c (12) sites (shO\vn <lbcl\'c) were hlended
with data from twenty-one (21) sites in the ITE ih Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The
resulting TGR of 522.62 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee r<ltc.
I
Locat;on
l~i,e(I.IUl1'1 I ')0,"1=
sO I L>,",' l",onl<""
Service Station (ITE lUC 944)
~ Trip 1.0"~1~ iT,;p I.e" I 'lImo I Trip
jnl<r>'i."., not< I l'<'riod L"l\~"h
" ",,,,.',," I'J"
""
.h......Jri I",,, tll' 1.4~
\\'d ht.-d .\..,,,,, hi J.<n ,I" l.~"
A,,," o 'I'd 1..,,'hW..llhh l,lll
\\'''''2IL''.'' I'","",,,,," 1"1''''',,,,,0
I',',eenl'e" 11..\lT I
1"1"
:'1',
'1.'
S"n,<o
I
J""".I"
,,,I,,,,,,,,,,,,J.J
1,',,,,:"'.'
,',,r,., ""'cr It ,~".,,""o'
ILlnkk.CH",,,,'K'^,,,,,,,,,",
EXDlanation: For LliC 944, a total of six (()) sites from the ITE ih Edititl!l Handbook were used 10 calculate
thc trip generation rate. This data was not blended v,"ith the Florida Studies because the Florida SLudies use
"1,000 sf' as the measurement unit, while Collicr County charges Ihe impact tl:e per "fuel position,"
"Iom,'"",,, 1'1
I"",IS,,"
S"..'."
1,,,,,; . .Teip L<Il~~h l'rip r,'r<<"l r-;"". \~n S"n,ro
lnl<",';""" I"u'n.i,,,, L'."~lh Teil"
''"'''.'.", ,-"U '1-.., 1,,,,1,,1. "j"" 0. ..\,,,~,,",,
I'" 1""",_;,,,,' , '." " I ""bk.('''"" 0. .."~~"""'
.'ii
,\",.,"",. Trl, L.. Ib: I."~
'hi,.""^",,,,'lrll"""h, ).,"1
""",~I","h",", ~'" 'nl'A""",C
"',n
folill!u.natioJl: For LUC ()47. a total nf(lllC (I) ~ite tJ'011l the ITE th Editi(ln ! landhook was used tn calculate
the trip generation rate, since no trip generatio!] data was a\aildble tJ-Ollllhc Flllrida Studics siLl'S.
Tindale-Oliver 8:. Associates, Inc.
February 2009
A-]O
Collier County
TranSp011atioll Impact Fee Update Study
AJenda Itel11 No, 17D
~ March 10, 2009
Page 72 of 113
APPENDIX B
Cost Component Calculation
;',Gsnja Item :-Jo. 170
" March 10, 2009
Page 73 of 113
Appendix B
Cost Component Calculation
All infonnation used to compute a twical cost per lane mile and a twical average daily
capacity added per lane mile is presented in this appendix. As noted, cOllnty road data was
collected from the Collier County Transportation Department as well as recent construction
bids fr0111 other counties in Florida. In the case of the state projects data, the sources are
construction bid data for state road projects in other Florida counties and FDOT gaming
reports for recently completed or fully proi,,'fammed capacity expansion projects in Collier
COllnty.
Ril!ht-of- Wav Cost
County
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions aiong the conidor that was
necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen or in the case of new construction
to build the road. Based on the local data, a ROW cost of $1.3 million per lane mile was
lIsed for county roadway projects with urban design characteristics. Table B-1 provides a
detailed description of the projects analyzed.
Slale
FDOT has not recently acquired ROW lclr any lane widening projects in Collier County.
Based on discussions with FDOT and Collier County. it has been detennined that tlle ROW
acqllisition cost for state roads is equivalent to that of county roads. Therefore, a ROW
acquisition cost of$I.3 million will be used to calculate the unit cost per lane mile of an
lIrban dcsii,,'Il state road.
Based on discllssions with FDOT, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the State
will build in Collier County in Loe future will have urban desii,,'Il characteristics. A review
of the widening projects along SR 84 in thc 5-year plan con tinned that only urban desii,,'Il
projects are being considered.
TindaJe-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
B-t
Collier County
Transportation Impact fee Update Study
Agenda item No. 170
:\l1arch 10, 2009
Page 74 of 1 13
Construction Cost
County
As shown in Figure B-1, a review of construction cost data for Collier County shows two
recently bid projects with urban section designs within the County. The weighted average
construction cost for the projects along Santa Barbara Boulevard and Collier BOlllevard is
approxImately $3.7 million per lane mile. In order to analyze a larger sample. a review of
recent county projects in Florida was conducted for county roadways. This review
captured lwelve (12) roadways and detennined a range of$I.7 million to $4.2 million per
lane mile for projects with urban design characteristics. When the two sets of data are
combined, the reslllting weighted average cost per lane mile is $3.1 million. As shown in
Figure B-1, the COllnty construction cost of approximately $3.1 million reflects the recent
trend of decreasing costs, and represents a conservative approach to the recOlllillended cost.
Table B-2 provides detail on all of the projects considered in the construction cost analysis
for cOllnty roads.
State
As shown in Table B-5, a review of statewide construction cost data shows nine recently
bid projects with urban section designs. The construction costs range from $2.3 million to
$4.7 million per lane mile with a weighted average cost per lane mile of $3.2 million. As
illllstrated in Figure B-1. the Stale construction cost of approximately $3.2 million reflects
the recent trend of decreasing costs, and represents a consef'vative approach to the
recommended cost.
It shollld be noted that two local projects in the 5- Year Program along SR 84 (from Santa
Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd and from Radio Rd to Collier Blvd) were identified. but
ultimately not inclllded in the analysis. The costs for these seb"nents represent nlture
estimates with a weighted average cost per lane mile of $4.9 million and are not reflective
of the recent statewide cost trends.
Other Cost Components
Counzv
The lInit cost per lane mile for cOllnty roads Collier COllnty also inc1l1des lIpdated lItilities,
mitigation, interchange and calTying costs associated with capacity expansion projects.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, lnc,
Februmy 2009
B-2
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
,c'.Jsnda item No, '[ 7D
~ r\flarch 10, 2009
Page 75 of 113
Utilities and mitigation cost estimates were developed based on four recently bid lane
widening projects in Collier COllnty. As shown in Table B-3. the lItilities cost is
approximately $455.000 per lane mile and as shown in Table B-4, the mitigation cost is
approximately $99,000 per lane mile for cOllnty roads.
Inlerchange cost estimates were developed based on two (2) planned interchange/grade
separation projects in Collier County that are expected to be completed by 2030. These
projects consist of improvements at the intersection of 1-75. CR 951 and Davis BOlllevard
and where the US 41 (Tamiami Trail) meets CR 951. The total interchange cost provided
by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department is $283.36 million. 111is Jigure
was then divided by the total lane miles being bllilt in the 2030 LR TP Financially Feasible
Constrained Plan (434.7 lane miles). As shown in Table B-7, the interchange cost per lane
mile is approximately $652.000.
The lane mile cost includes an update to the carrying cost that tends to occur while a
roadway is being built (approximately a 6-year process for County projects). As presented
in Table B-8. the carrying cosl per lane mile is estimated at $259.000 based on the time
table provided by the county for each phase. This Jigure takes into consideration the fact
that the County receives some of the impact fees up front.
State
The lInit cost per lane mile for state roads Collier COllnty also includes lIpdated mitigation,
interchange, and calTying costs associated with capacity expansion projects.
Since no data \\.'3S available for mitigation costs of state roads, the mitigation cost for
cOllnty roads was used (Table 8-4). Also. the slate road construction cost estimate does not
include a lItilities cost due to the fact that the Collier COllnty Water-Sewer DistJict pays for
utility relocation costs associated with state facilities.
As with county roads, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000 for
stale roads Cfable B-7).
In addition, the lane mile cost includes caIT)ing cost that tends to occur while a roadway is
being built (approximately a 6-year process for State projects). As presented in Table 8-9,
the carTying cost per lane mile is approximately $264.000 based on the cost components
associated with constructing a state roadway. This fit,'1lrc takes into consideration the fact
that the COllllty receives some of the impacl fees which charge for travel on all roads up
front.
Tindale-Olivcr & Associates. Inc.
r ebruary 2009
B-3
Collier County
TranspOltation Impact Fee Update Study
OOH0
I'-O~
~O~
, N~
.0
0",
-~I'-
~.c Q)
2f:::rn
-roro
.g2o...
c
Q)
OJ
<(
In
"0
c:
Q)
.,.... ...
'I-
1:0....
Q) In
... 0
~U
.~...
u.. c:
Q)
tJ
Q)
0::
-
0'1
=
=
M
'-'
'"
....
'"
o
U
=
o
...
....
(,I
=
:..
....
'"
=
o
U
....
....
=
=
o
U
:..
QJ
...
-
-
o
U
- ,1>-.
:~€
i 0 .2
ii~~
, .~ co
I~ "R
U;::J
.
.
~
? >t.d 0
"
.e ;;.
2 ~~ oS
2
" ~
-g ~ 0
0 '" B'
" '" fiJ 9 ~ ;
~ € 0 0 '"
u u 2- -
0 .
0 ]
w '" ~ 3 .g
~ ~ ~ ~
" 0
- ~ jj jj
~ <
R ~ jj , , Ji ~!l
E .
1\ 0 0 . " 0 Fi~
U U ~ w U
, + + 0 0 ..
~
2-
-g
~
0 g ~ g g 0 0 0 0 0
'"' ~ g 0, " " '0
~ ~ 0 ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~
0
0
~ ~ '" ~ ~ c, cl
~ ~
OlI!IU;lUnIJad),Jso:) IIO~Jn.lJSU(l.J
:;!l
c.~
0-
fi~
'T
'"
~.:S
!?,s:;
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ig
I"
~
.:f
I"
I tg
- N
9 ?"'
.3 :a
!.g 2
! ~.o
1'= ~
'1:8
h
~'~
"
g8
c. N
1
om",
r--o~
~o~
N_
o _0
ZOr--
~r--
C.l: Q.l
2ecn
-CVr:tl
"'::;;0..
"
ill
OJ
<(
1:.--.
::: .s
,g .2
!(.,l.fl
I' ~
=~
0=
c,;o
~
~
u
o
]
.2
ii
"
[j'
@
~
c:
.2
n;
'3
"
"
'-'
1;;
ai8
.!!!;;:
.gO
>-D::
>-
c:
"
o
'-'
~
~
'0
'-'
-
. ~ ~ ~ >; = ~
. ~ 0
0. . ~ 0 C, M
'" i Me ,; '" '" ~;
. ~ ~ = M, ~
0 " or) ~. rt rL '" ::;
U . ;;;; - - -
~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
0 oJ
'"
.. 00 = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. . ~ N ~
= . . " " 00 " " :;; ;;
.:l~ .. c, N ~
..
'" . .
= =
:J .
= = = ;;; ..l
" :>: = 00 g :; .
= ~ .
. '" cO -r ,; "- "-
~ ~ ~ ~ '0 is ~
"" . V-~ .re 00 ~ = 0
1 0 '" cO '" U U
U - - '0 M, 00
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
~ . ~
i!2 " "
~ ~
. .. ~
. .
= .. " ~ ~ ~ "
. .. ~
oJ '"
~ ~
~
, '"
_ .:: ~
0 1L3 ~
... -
=
. "
, ~ ,;;
8 '0 - "
V " :0
"
j ~
5 ' ~ '" ~ =
. u ..::
E . " '" =
'" - "
~ ~ ~
0 "
~ '0
c, U ;::
~ ~
= , =
~ ' = u '"
0
0. 2 = i:: u
'C -2 = ;;
. :ii CO
~ 0 is
'" .~ V c
" . ;; ,
=
" 0 " :3 '5
00 c, > -
~
?
o
3
~
~
"
~ .~
~
V .~
= "
g 3
5 V
~~
j':
'-' ti
] OJ
3~
"; .2
s]
if; 1.l
i
,~
'"
'*
:;
~
:;0
'"
;:;:<.::
.::: :5
;::::N
~~
]~
o Q) r0
~O~
".....0...-
~- N4-
.0
c> DO
_~C-
c..c: Q.l
2~cn
-roro
.g:2:!L
c
'"
OJ>
<{
<II
ti
"
'0'
~
0..
>-
..
;=
'0
..
o
N~
mZ':'
oS! 5
.co
IOU
>-"
'0
.~
.$
..
-
en
'0
C
..
'iij
"
o
...J
..
. -. :;; 0 ~ ,- N 00 '" ~ ::: ;;: ~ ~ 00 ~ ;;; '2 N
. 00 ~,
~ . ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ " N ~ 0 ~ ~ N
. ;:i '" N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ - ~ ~ ~ .; .0
'"' '" '" .0 .; .; ,.; ~ 00 ;;i '" ~
. ." :; ~ ~
. ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 -. ~ ~ ~
~ .- .0 ., ~ ~ '" ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ..; N '" ,;
;:B ~ ;;; N N .; '" N N N N r;i ..; N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0".,
U U
~ 0 00 ~ 0 N -. N 0 ~ ., 0 N ~ ~ ~ N N
.' ~ -. N 00 ~ ~
'C -. ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ 0 ~, N ~ ~ ~ 0 00, 0 ~
0 ~ ~ ~ 0 q ~ 00 0 N ~ 00 0 " N g
.. ~ " 0 ~ 0 -. 0 ".; '" N .; '" ~ ~ ~ N
. ! ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ N, q '" ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ '0
..; .; 0 0 0 ..; 0 " .; ".; 0 ~ 00 .0 ..;
U ~ N ;;; N N :;;
= ~ ~ ;;; ;;; N ~ ~ -. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ ~
0 ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~
U
. 00 g ~ 0 0 ~ 0 00 00 ~ 0 N ~ ~ 00 := ~ ;:;
~ " ~ ~
~ 'Ii 00 '" ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ 0 ~ 0 N :<i ~
0 .; N .0 0 N S '" ., N - ~ '" N
~ ~ ~
.~
:<
'"'
. ~ ..
.
~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ . N " ~ 00
~,~ 0
U
".oS ;?; 0 ., 0 ~, 0 0 -
"I:lIl.' ~ '2 :': ;;; '" ;;
CF'" ~ N -. -. N 0 N
:l' ~ '~ 0 N - ~, 0 - ".; - - - - -
"
~ " " " " ~ " " ~ , ~ " " " ,
'" '5, .. ~ ~ .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .. ~ ~ -e
'" :5 :5 :5 :5 :5 :5 ::0 :5 ::0
~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
.. 3 3 2 g - 2 g 2 g 2 B 3 2 2
0:: ~ ~ 0 N N N 0 N N N N N N N
'!! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. = '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " '" '" '" '"
" .
00
. N N N N ,- N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
~" 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 5 ~
" " 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 "
N N N N N N N N
" "
" 0 .
" .
0 0 ~ ~ "'
... ;; " ~ '" .
'" ~ > 05 -<
" , " '" "
-;; " . 0
"' '" ~ . ~~
- 0 " :;; 0
'" - ~ . " " ~
0 0 00 00 N ~ ~~
> , .0 " 8 ~ ~ " ~ ~ '-0 -,
X " 1'1 " 0 00 ~ " ~ '" o _
" ::0 '" ~ z ,.'"'
'X ~
>
e . "
~ ~
0 " ~ ~
. ~
... ~ 5 ~ " . " v
" < ~
. " . 05 " Vi "
~ ~ -<
0 f2 " .g - - 0
.' 0 ~ 0 " 00 "
;; ~ ~ '" ~~
~ ., " ~ " ~
, 0 00 c ~ ~ " "' < w !l 0 00 " 0
v ::0 Z :::::i '" v w '" 00 00 ::0 - "
- =
. ~ .
~ ~ -
.. " ~
'5. . v ;;: <:
'0 ~
. ] = "
. " . :9 ~ - 05 ~ .
" " . . ~ " ~ ~ .
" > ~ " . "
0 ~ 05 " . -t: "
-E " 0 ::l 5 -< 00 ~ u
] '" " " ~ e
v ;;; ~
. B ~ ~ ~ ~ :;; ,.. ~
" . < - 0 " ~ " ~ ~ ~ -;; ~
.. ..
" " 0 c " " 0 " !S ~ =
00 u " " v u if, v v ~ u "' " " a ~
.
e . ~
'~ .
, ~ 0
.. . 0 0 < ~ .~ N 00
= :=- P 0 ~
. . 0 ~ 0 0 0 C 5 . c 0
0 N
U ~ . ,2 'g ~ ~ . .
, 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 . :;; :=Cl..
0 '0 " 5 '0 " " " '" 0 '0
u u c > ~ ~ ;;. > > ~ ... u :::::
f' ~
, ~
0 z
u 00
. ~
.
'0 ~
~
U ::0
. -. ~ 0 -. ~ .
~ Q .
. ,. N ~ ~ ~ :': ~
0 ;; ~ " Q
U .; ~. ~' - V. Q u
~. .
. ~ 00 " -. ~. ~
. " -. ~ " " ~. .s
.", . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "
'" ...1 ~
.", .. 0
., i!. ~
Q 00 -. " ~ 0
~ - ~ " ~
0 00 ~. ~ 0 .
U .0 '" - .0 ::J E
. :': ~ eo: 00
.. N " Q
@ .; N .0 .; .0
~ ~ ~ ~ -
. ' ~
"
'C Q ~ ~ 00 ~
. . or, N "
. " -2l - 00 ,...j ::-:; ,,;
. ~
...1 ~ ~
~ 'C
.
. 'C N ~ " n
. ~
...1
,;" ~ Q ., "
" c, ~ 0 c,
. n N n "
~,.
.~ a " c c
. .
- .0 .0 ~ 5
" =0 :'3 :'3
'" Ch
'0
.. ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ l 3 3 3 -
>- ~ c, c, "
'E
:J ~
0 :l 'C 6 ~
~ . 0 iii -
" 0
'" <II CL>
-
r:O <II
0
" U - ~ ~ ~ c
. 0 0 ~ 0 ~
:c VI I .:: Q ~ ~ ~
.. " n c, c, n
>- ~
5 - -
- -
or, ~
>- ~ ~
'E " " ]
:J ..L ~ ~
0 ? '2 'C 0
U :' ;; . . -s
- 0
~ I , " .; " ~
~ 0 5 " !
0 u "
'0 " " " 0
U ." ] ~ ~ .~
0 0
, " " ~ > @
0
G G " "'
0
'C 0 u
;; C @
> € '5
u 2....8
'3 "
~ " ~~
" - ~ <
0 ~ c
" " . 0
, u u ~
.< v ,J
0 ~ " " B
? 0
:s " '0 . 0 ]
c ~ ,
~ v G 0
. 0 "
. ~
" - 0 " ,-
- v ~
0 or, ? -
" ~ ~ 0 :s;:' .~
~ " u
. 'u ~ - ,
.e ~ ~ ~ ,- 0
i 'C ~ U ~ ~ ~
. . ~ " .~ 0 . "
~ 0 ~ 0 - " ~ ]
. " " 0: S "
0 0 "
'" 0 1 " ~ ? ~ "
" " " ~ . ~ '5
~ ~ '" .. .<:;
0 .": ~ " c c ~ ~
~ 0 00 0
" " .. 0 - " -<
" G ~ ~ "
z '"
~ ~
0
0
N
e.
0
, ?
~ B
"
~
b
c
o
o
u
u
~
~
51-
.
.
oS
~
.0
ii
~
>
2
~
.
g
1!
u
o
~
~
.
,g
..
.
..
B
~
~
8
.
.
u
5'
0-
.:J
.
o
~
,g
'6
,g
"
o
g
o
8'
~
~
o
~
o
'5
c
~
::: 0Jj
, c
~.~
g~
u.
u "
.:.~
>. ;2
.00
_ 0
o;:s
~-s
!? '~
~-
~ ,~
:;; rJ
o ^
- .
=~
t: 'fi
0' "
::;.<ii
~.~
5'
o '
~ ".
.....=.-
~ ti
-0 :<
~ "
~J1
,"""1::
c.; t
. =
g~
VJiU
-0
:=:z:
00)(")
!,-o-
~O~
N~
ci .0
ZOO)
~r--
E..c Q)
2~Ctl
-roro
ro2'''-
'0
~
iii
::ll
<0:
"
Vi'
'C
'"
o
0::
>.
1:
~
o
~
<1l
"'-.;
dl8
.!!! ~
.co
~~
Cl
.,
~
~
5
o
(j
.~
'0
(j
::\ 00 "' 0 ~ ~
. . ~ 00 0 ~ ~
. " 00. ~ '0 "' ~,
u '" ~ "' <rj "' ~
= . c, 00 c, ~ S ~
. = ;;; ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~
'" .
:'....l
'" -
:i! .
..
0 0 0 " ~ ~ ~
. . .. 0 0 c' "' ~
= . . 0 0 oc -i N " ~
. ~ .. c, ~ M "' ~
...l .. " .
.." ;;
0 ~ 0 " 25 -
= 00 00 :'0 - .
. c, 00 ~ 0 ,:: .
'" ~ "' cJ ~ ,,; "" ...
. . "' '0 .c,
~ . " c, " . .
'" U <"_I <r~ ~' .; u ~
:i! ~ ~ ~, iT,
~ ~l ~
.. - .
~ . . .
= .. ~ ~ ~ '" '"
. ..
...l .., ]
.., .., ~
.
" " "
.., ..,
. 0; a " ~
,. .
o '" 0 "
01 ;: c
C/) ::: ~ 0
u , u
" "" a
;;: ..,
" .., ..,
e " "
. " " " OS
. .. ..
.. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
C "
..,
"
= ..,
.. .., g "
'0. " :i: "
'0 " = :3
~ I.
. ~ " 0
a " 0 ..
" 3
.5 - ;; '5
:5 ;>
it
u
"
:i
"
;;
~~
l:~
::.I..;::
~ ~
,.",
:: s
~.~
E ~
~~
~'
~ 13
~ g
':'2
;~ g
:i '<
~~
L
"
;;,
I" ~
I g]
(,,00
. .
i~i
,"co
.
"
~
.'!l
u
~
'0
-
0-
;>,
'"
"' ~
dl-g
~ 0
:co::
'" ~
1--
'"
en
~
'C
.~
~
OJ
en
. ~ ~ M ~ '0 00 co ~ 0 M 0 ~
= ~, co
. = ~, c, - 0 ~ "' 0 0 00 "' ~ ~,
. " '" ~ ~ M ~ .'C '"
'" ...l "' .; "" "' ~' "" ..; .;
u ... Of c, 0
= . M ~ ~, 00 0 ~ 0 ;:;
l: . :i! 0 .' ~ ~. c' 0; ~, M M 00 00
.. ~. .; " .; cO ,J <"_I ..; ..; '" ~; <"-I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. .
v8-
c': ~, 0 " ~ ~ ~, 0 C' M ~ ~ ~,
~ ~
:! ~ ~ 00 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
co ~ c' c, " ~, 0 ~. 0 ~.
. ~ t ,: ~, ~ 0' c, cO "' 00 "' N
= . ~ ~, ~, '0 ~ 0' '0 0 0 ~
l: . ~. " M 00 co '" 0 0 ~. ~.
~ U if' cO ~, if' 'r~ .; 00 ..; N 25
~
";'1 co ;;; if, - ;;; ~ ~ ;;;
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:;
U
~ ~! ~ ~ 00 0 co N ~ 00
~ . .. " ~ ~ 0 - Of 0 :< c' ~,
... . M '0 -i M ,.c -i ;', ei ~ -i if,
. ~ " :,; " -,
...l <'1
~ 'E ..
= .. c, co c, c, ~ co ~ c, " 0 if, ~
. ." .
...l .., U
-S co - ~, ., ., x -, ~,
~ 0
0 ~, 0 C, if, ~ -
. - co ,i - - "' ~ - c;
" ...l
= ~ ~
.!/ ;; ;; a a a ;; a
~" = = -e = = i' = ~ ~
:; " " - - -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
.e
. 2 - E - - E - - .2
. ~ ~ ~ ~ c, co c, ~ ~
..
.
S ~ .., .., .., .., ~ ~ ..,
. 0 ro - ro '" '" '" ro
" . "
'"
- c_ c' c' " " ~ 9 00 ~
. x x 0 0
. 0 0
;.. N r:! e, ;=:-1 ;:::; co F'i co N
~
.., -;, "
> '" ~
I OS ..,
= ~ " t "
,. I- I:; ~ ~ ~,
~ ;; ? "' '"
j, < " = ~
;;: U t U 0 ("
u = " jJ
" ~ ? ]
< '" " g 0 ~ s <:
~, I. " '"
- " "
. " ~ u 0 0
~ .. ::E " ;i. :i :c
z u ~ :/; ~
.
'"
e ~ .., ~
e co ;;: ;;: x ;;: <
.. .'A a ~ "
:2 " ~ "
~ ~ " ~ -;;; <"1
co Vi - ~ 0 00'
0 - :;: - '- '0
~ . ~ 0 '0
~ ~ ~
z z J.. U oj 00 v' v' :3=
c,
~I -;
= I -
.. I~ I~I '"
I '0. 21 I 1::::- ~
.~ - - -
':!2 ~ v:;-
. :c " ~ .~
'" ;; - 0;
v' ~~ 'r; ~ -,
- ~ - ~ 00 "' 'c, :z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"
r;; - :;:; ~ ~ Vi ~ v: .~~
, >. I = u " .:
I .. gl~11 tl ;; I" = ~ ~
? " ~ :$ 0
0 ~
. I~
u "III~ ;; ;; ..
,01-01 B ~ ,. '" ~ ~ C
,;..-j:, v:. :.:::;::: ;;: ~
Es
_0
~~
:] ~
;- .....
o
o
~
~
"
2
Z"
"
~
.'
"
;:l. :.t,
~
~ ~
(')'0
'"':l a
; '-'
~ g
00::;
o 0
~':E
1 ~
-r. ;;;;
~ ~
~-2
';2
.E ~.
~. ::
;:;:
U '"
"'
1
~=-
:5 ~
;(~
~ 1:
o
.
g
:t
.~
8 ~
2~
~~
::-i
00)(<)
e-O~
~O~
N_
O
00
~ro
E..c Q)
2~cn
-roro
{g:2:D..
c
Q)
en
<{
U>
0>
'"
..
"
0>
'" "
cO a;
0-
0>-
-W
-alu
....'0
C
..
C
'"
'iij
0>
C
.
_U
"'"
u.
4
- .
~u
-"
. .
Q .
~
t...!:!
~~
u;
- .
",oJ
f-':'--
.
u
;;;
1 u
f--
.
.
~
~ .
. u
.
0<
U
f:--
a ~ OJ
=...=
.2!'..;;S
~..~
F-;;--
.
u
.
.~
.!i
f--
:::J!1l
j~~
f--
. ~
. ~
:l~
~
~
to
1 ~
c--='-
.
u
'.
Q
I "
.
~
~
f--
.
~ u
. .
Q.
~
f--
f--'
f--
1
f--
Cl' ..,.- ~
,--' ~: -T :} :
~
~ ^
S]
. -
u~
u .
.
~
c ~
v;:)
~
~
"
," 'b ~ ~ ~
c<> .", ".; '" ~
. <.
;e ~ r- Z
~~~g
u
.
]
g
E
o
~
"
~
o 0
goo Cl' 0 <>c
~~:S~i
;;; r;.! ..., ~ ~
0'.0' ',", ~
~ ~ 'c, 0' :::~..
:I, 0"
:'"' ~,;
~ti~~~
;;;
:;; : ,- ~
"" e:;< ~ ~
~ ;;; "" ;;;
g ~ c<> 8, ~
~ '" ~ ~ ~
;;;;;;;;....li~
~ g :?, ~
'"' <:<:i:J OG
"'.,,-.,.- l"
~ c: ;;
,...; '" ",",'"
~ ] 2 ]
-' ::; :5 :5
"?
co
'" '..D -c..D
.8 0 0 0
"1-"" "T
'0 "" "':j "'0
ciS ciS ci::: 2i
..D ''''..D
? ? ~ ?,
'0
c c
. .
~~
~
.
.
.
~ ~
,
u
g g
. '"
~ c
'" .g
. .
,
~ <3.
OJ g
~ ~ ~ 8
~
o
~
=:
"
"
c
I~
J
6
~
"
e
I~
1*
I ~
,~
I",
! t; ~
;":0::
'~ ~.
:] ~
:.-...
e
.
~
~
g ~
u '" ~
c u
~ (.:) ~
.;: ~ c.
~ ;t ] c!
~ :::
.
f'
"
o
~
.
,.
~
~
Q
. ~
-'" 0:: ..
o ~
o ~I ' ~I
];~zco~o
~ II.> ='.0 ~-c'
~ <Ii ~3~_._-
~. ~_c_' h ...-;;,~
~-~~,~;
OQ)M
"'O~
~O~
N_
O _0
ZO~
,... ~ CO
c...c m
2~D:l
-rom
~:2:CL
c
(!)
en
<(
In
...
In
o
U
c:
o
:;:;
l\l
...
l\l
a.
I'- ell
'en
aJ
ell ell
_"0
..0 l\l
l\l ...
1-(.')
"0
c:
l\l
ell
01
c:
l\l
.r:
C.l
...
ell
...
c:
~
'"
I >, >,
"'"
~ ~
~ -
OVJ
U !.,)
t) ~
.~ '"
=: Co
O;:J
U "
"
'-<
- 0 0 ~ ~ '"
~ 0 0 ~ r-- 10
:0 0 0 :> -i 00
U ~ ~ Q '" ...
"" 0 '-0 ~ "'" 10
.. O. '" '" ~
- <n '" ..) '"
'"
.5 '" ~ 00
N
- v; '"
~
~
'" 00
.. 0 0
= 0 0
N N
'" ~ >,
....
... .D
.. .~ 51
... .5 ~ .;:;
'"" " "
Q Q
"
.- "
~ - "
00 ~ ~ 0:;
" "
~ 0>
.3 Q ,~ 0
'0 ~
c.. E
,~ -5 ~
c.. "
~
~ b .S 3" .~
== a u 'C
- "" g 0>
'" " " 0
- -d h '0 '" '"
'" '" '0 :2 ;;
" .:2 "
6 " ~ 3 >, ::::
>. 0 "
~ K 0 ~ " C'. :::
c. " ~ gf) ~ -<
c. g '"
'" ,:2 i-
i- ~ i- 'g " ~
SiJ ;:., ;; " ~
0 0 '0 "
a '(;; a .a 0> ~ -
" '0 ~ .-;
Co '0 "" VJ '" '"
~ -
~ .=:
~ :;
;;
:;;: ~
'" :::: ~
-
== '0 ..
:0 ~
.~ '" - i:: "
- 0> ", ..
" " -
.... '" - -
" '3 ^" ~ :: ~
Q, " ~ :0 :0
.. "l U U u
'" ~ " . ..
~
.. .;; '" 0lJ ~
"" '""
" '" OJ ~ :::::
.... a u u
iJ ...:;
r= .. ....
<n " e; ~
'"
c< .s N -
U c; ;: ~
Vi - :;
~ :0
"
'"
,..
.s
~
.2
;;
~
i3
Co
~
;;
'-<
g
gJ
"
5
0
~
";'
'. "l
~
"
~
"
2
.-
~
;;
Co
u
Q
~
;;
3:
:;;
.:;:;
~
~
"
3 1)
~ Q ~
0--< 1.)
1?,-~ ~
- ~
'S::3 :~
..: :':!;
>,t- u
~m~
o ;.< ;}
0~;d
~ ~ ~
;;::-,0
j <2
.5
'"
"
;;
'(3
o
~
~
<(
"d
!.,) 0 ~
~J ;.; ti
o 0
v.' vj 2
=N~
'"
,~ g
-'"
q c
~ '"
'" ~
"'215
.::: 1.)
:-<;J...
o Q) ('')
r--O~
...>;"""0.,-
N_
,0
ON
~ro
C-= (ll
22rn
-roro
ro"-a..
'0""
C
(I)
en
<t
Ui'
"C
<Il
o
a::
>.
-
CO l::
. ::l
!DO
QlU
~
.coo
<Il_
l- 00
o
U
Cl
l::
.~
...
<Il
U
::;
""
';
10..
-
l'ii'J
..
'"
-
=
...
s
d>~':
=;;;-
J\:'~
-;':':. ;
O..U
"'"
'"
-:::'"tc:
;; ~
Q, ~
5 e
-< ;
=:l
'"
I ~
-=
10..
'" on on on if, on~
00 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1.0
00 r:-o N 1.00
~d:d:oo~.q-~-
tA-fA- ffl 1.0 lr) "'1"
"" "" N
"" ""
0000
0000
lr) 0 0 0
oo~ r:-~ r-: r:-~
0- 1.0.-
~~~:}
""
,-,000
0000
lr~ lr~ 0 0
00 00 o~ o~
00 lr) lr)
- - 1.0 1.0
tA<A'EA~_......
~..
=
'S
E:;
......Nffl"'1"lr)\O
~ ~ a a ~ ~
(!) (!) (!) v Q) Q)
><>--><>--><><
5b,~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0 0
QOc.::c.::
00
00
00
r-:r-:
'" on
7~rr:.,
'" on
"" ""
go
o o~
60
N N
0\" 0\"
"" ""
-: -:
~~
:=J:=J
::,-
~:.r.l
\,l\,l
b b
~ ~ -;;
6 0 '0
u u ~
~ ~
'" 0
r-:'Ir,
-
or.
'"
;;;
~
~
'"
~
;;
....l
i::
10..
-
~
"
u
..
=
os:.
..
..
"
U
:0
-",
<.>~
;;
.;;::
-<~
.S ~
"0
'"
10..
~
'"
'"
...
-
<.>
"
C.
5
...
.....
"
-
=
"
<.>
..
"
=-
~
"
~
~
"0
"
D
Ol
v
3
~
~
~
~
~
""
~
~
o
or,
o
o
N
v
-S
~
N
00
~
or.
N
'"
I
56
'.g ~
" ~
:; ~
~ -
~ ~ ;: .~
~"'1' ~Jj::E ;!2
-;:: o'~;:: 5
8.:g ~ 'v,
ui-,o..E </)
Q c ::: .~ a ~
on - O;!l :r;_
"E13o ~~
a~~~ 5"g
~ 5..0'- '"
O::E.132",&~>n
9 (J)'E ..c & 2 2 E
-- 2 ~ ~ ;g ~ () ~~
'(':;j~u"ci'-a.B~::.
5E~o"';-'~o~
0. -' - (/) () U
;a ~ ~ ~.~ 'JJ ;: 'E
~ ~ g.- 5. 0,) ~ ~
-8~~_~{;~
~~"22~~~
5 ~ 5 ~~ c: ~ ~
3;:;!:lf)"D1ig.
l.. 8 0 -i'~ 5.:::
'::! -:..0 6 0.. U
- <1) - 0,) 'll ~
oo.g_!lJa;
~ a 8 ~ .~ ~
~ "'.:: [; p
5~i:i_~E&
o :e 0 ~ 0 0
..r.no:li- i-f-
'"
Z
'"
~
"
....l
..
'"
c.
-
~
"
U
..
oS
>.
..
..
"
U
'::;N;:;):;t>n~
--''--'----
;r;
-;;
-S
"0
v
~
.,3
~
v
.:!l
"'"
.....
r!
~
9
5
o
U
~ ~
u ;2
ell ~
-5.:: .v
t... ~ ]
~ @ ---
;3"::.~ ~
;: -5 ~ OJ
a; 0';:::: .....l
0..:-< ::::. ~
~ 0
t: Z
v
"
"
~
~
"0
~
>,>,
-"0
" "
" -
DVJ
U v
~ -
v "
,_ "0
::: 0-
8;:)
"
"
0..
;)
"
r
"
,2
-;;
t
o
0-
~
8
""
:";!
~
0-
~
"
'"
fR
'0
';
o
~
";2
a
~
v
g
"0
<2
~
"
0-
.s
.....
o
~
~
~
v
0.
>,
..0
"0
.~
].
~
o
.~
6
.:!l
~
~
"
E
"0
v
~
"
v
~
~
,"
~
]
:of.
v
-;;
'G
o
~
.<
"d
;)a-
.~ g
- N
q C
..!: "
" "
"" ~
I.s .g
I~ w...
OOH0
,"O~
~O~
N_
O _0
ZOO)
~ ~ ro
::::.r:: Q)
~2O'J
-C\lC\l
~2D..
c
Q)
OJ
<(
~
III
"'C
ra
o
!:t:
Q)
0')-
, ra
00-
l/l
Q) ~
- III
.c_
ra III
1-0
U
Cl
l::
.~
"-
ra
U
0'0
.~~
::: ;<j
~ ;;
~-5 V
E ~ ~ ~ Q
~ l(; .~ ~ R 9
t ~ 'll .... >-. =
8..~.,gc .DO
0~o..~ ",2
^ z '_: _,:
-;::: 5'0 ,,'::
::; "0 ""0 0 '5' 3::
E..g ~ ~ =:! ~
,..,.- C13 'll -
.E ~ ..o'~ -::l'-::: ~
~ ~]] ~ ~"B~~
2ut;3::~..o~t3~"E
~g:.l-;jQ.1::3~:g
o .:: B ~. t) ~"8 ~ .~
2' ~ C13 ::I 1) .= ~:'j
- :J r.f) 'o.'lj 1::
a :Ii ~ .... ;::: u C':l ;::! r-...
r=: 8 a CJ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~C':l
9~] 2~'~.0
:3 :: 6 ~2 r- ~
8 g g ~ ~ ~.~
~..o, c.. 8 -
] "'3 'J) C':l ~
o[5,B;.;u-
:5~~.~~'o
~ "0 '" ~ - p -:=
:;c...o;\j-C35.
a~~~~~
::.
0 0 0 0 00 ',-,1 '" ~ ,...
) 0 0 v, 0 N ~j '" 0 -
N "'" -c. '" '" ..... -
,...' "",' '" ",f "",' ~ Of) ...
.1l-< <A "'" '" "" ..... '"
"" <A <A 1/', .....
- ~ "" ""
~
..
...
..
-=
...
- 0 0 0 0 0 g
= 0 0 0 0 0
= c- o 0 0 0 ""
0 "'" 0- 0- 0- 0- ";' ",'
~ .. '-D N r- '" '" C",
';:: - '" '" '-D. ": "'.
... "" <A <A - '" or,
-; os "" <A <A
- U
0
""
'" 0 0 0 0 0 0
- "'C 0 0 0 0 0 0
= .. 3- ~~ 0 ~~ "" ""
= ~ g c:-
o ::c -c "" "" 0
S 0 - - -c '-C x. x
...
-< ... "" "" "" <A - -
0 "" <A :0
"l -"
" -
-
", ;;
-.. - '" '" "'" "" oD ~ .:: '"
= ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~
'= OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ
= " " " " " " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " .-
;; =g ::
I ,. ..... ~
... :;::
.. ~ ...
Q., .. a;
- "
~ "" 0.
U - -
" ~
~ 0
" ~ .S u
~ ::;
os ell
-= '" '" .... ... .: .
1l-< Ll.l Ll.l ... ~
... ....
u CJ " 0 ...
~- u - ...
- ::: ;:; ::: "
51 ~I) 3 ::: ;; a; u
;2 ~ "
~ .~ 0 0 0 ::: - ... -
" C 0 ~ "
0 (:) '" '" u ~ z
~
;2
<3
:Il
"
~
il
>
"
'"
~
f-o
~
~
v
on
=>
=>
N
-5
:::::N;;;~;;;8
--"-- -----
:0
>,>,
:="
5 .3
CU'J
U IU
._~ ~
;<
85
"
"
w.
U
~
~
!
.2
;;;
,...
<3
0.
~
~
f-o
"
~
;
>
"
~
"(;j
0.
~
"
'"
rf
"13
o
C
'-0 V1
;2
;
u
~
.~
c\
~.~
-~
if. 'll
o ..
() ~
'JJ) -
- "
.::: 0
~' '0
; .
ij -= ~
2 ~ v
g, f- ...J
1
if.
.!J
~
"G
0
~
~
<(
"8
i'i '"
> =>
=>
- '"
~ ;>-
v a
" 0
] 15
"
w.
1)
;:::'3
~z.
OOHO
c-O~
-r:O~
N_
. 0
0",
~ ~ ro
c..c: CLl
.92f::rn
-roro
.g:2:D...
c
Q)
Ol
<(
c
'"
0:
1:J
..
"
'iij
-
U;
"
o
U
..
:c
'0;
'"
..
0"-
~:>.
alii
~'(j
.0"
'" '"
!- .5
"-
11.
....
e::
...J
o
'"
o
N
:>.
'E
::I
o
U
.~
'0
u
~~
~
~~
~<
~€
.~ ..
i ~
>u
~Ie oc 0 ~I'C .... '" 0 r, 0 ~I''''''''' t- ~I('I 0 '" '" ,..., ,0 'C"-, ,- 0 C 0 ",.10 ff", ~ "" 00 0 0
'" "" rl r, .;,1"- t_ <::) ...... 0 "" r- 0 ,..., C" 'C t_ 0 ff', t- '" co 0 '" .-, '" r, <> .-, ":;1"" '<j- r"."" 0' "" n '"
_ '" 0 oc...... -oj- ..., ""' -0 0 '" _ '" 00 t, ,_ '" V> .". <Xl .,., .". '" "" "" = r- '" 0 .". r-, 00 'n '" 00
~~~ ~~r~~gi~fi~~t-~~gig~o~~~~~~~~~~i~~O'i ~~~~
-=~
.;:;:
~ .
., .
u
00000 0 .,., V> ""10_ 0 co 0 0
""00"'" __"'''' '" 00 00_ _"'''' __0 0 r,_r-, 00__
V>V> 0'0'0'0- "''''''''''''''''''' 0'0'0' 0'0'''' 0000000'0000 ~O'
~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__~~ ~d~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{f
2.
. .
~ .
.U
0000 ""' "''''"",,,",00 0 ""' _000 <nO
00 00 00 ('I _ 00 00 _ _ r> 0 0 0 _ rl 00 _ _
"",,,,,,",000' 0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'"",,,",0'0' 0'0'0'0'0'0'0' t-<n 000'00 0-0-
~~'~~~ gg~~~~~"'~~~~~ ~ ~ g~~ ~~ ~gg ~~
h 0000 0 ooo~~~iioo~iooooiooo""'g _200000000
~ 1 ~;~, :;:;I::{ _ ~ ~:;:;:;:; ~ ~ ; ~ :};,;-?
'=;,5
ggogg~~g~g~8~2oooog~@g~o8gig8~o ?~@",cigig
<i- r; _ .,f 0 .-i ..., ,.c, .,,: "i -i "j 0 ,-..: D r-..: '1- ..,; oci..,; ".,;....; D oci.,; 0 0: ,,; -i 0: ....; c: _ ....;,..; oci
~ _ _ ,..'c,
.
~~
~~
. ~
~----~
~
~
~
.,
.
~
<',,..,,..,,.., c,...-,..,,..,,.., ,.., r,,..,,..,,..,,..,,.., r, r,""",''''''''''''''''','''' rl"" ro n r, ,,' rl..c...c. '1- '.O..c.,..,"""..,,.
~
..
J
oooooo~.".oooooooooooooooooooooo 000000000
o 0 '" o..c. '" "'", 0 0 '" 0' '" C .". L_ 'n .". CO' 0 0 _ ~ 0 0' 0 r, 0
r; o-";~ ....;,..i ri~""; ....;","";";_0"";""; ",..;rio.". ,..;.,;~ "0"'; "~"i
i:i"
~
~
e
.
,!;
,..,,..,<', ~...-~~.."..".."..".."..".."..". ."..". .".."...".."..".."..".~.".~~~~~.".~~ ""'1-
000 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 D 2 ~ 0 D D ~ 0 0 000 ~ 0 0 C 0 coo ~ 0 0
o 0 0 0 ..". 0 .". .". ,.., ,.., rl rl <'l rl rl 0 0 I'l '" 0 0 0 -0 c, rl rl 0.". .".."..".0 coo <0 0 0 0
. .
. ~
'):l--
. .
J!~
rn ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ a ~ g ~ ~ ~ a e e a ~ g e a @ a a e 2 ~ a a a e
~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~5~~~ 5~~~~~~ 5~555~
~
~ ~
_..,.;;;: _u "'" "'"
E ~~~~~~~~"","",~ffi ""'~
2;~~i~3~~8n~~~~~~~
~ @ :3 g ~ ~ ~ .;: ~ ~ :g ~ g -: ~ ~I~ 0' 0' 0'
2"'3 C]~O e:c~~~~]:g3~~~~
~
~
~
.
.
,
i'!
J.j~
:;;.E:
0) elf"
= "'
.. -" ~
~"
~ ~
..:JCiS "'"
5.g~~
C -'" co "
':... " c:;?; ~
~w~c=~
~
~
~
. - ~
-0 "'tl::ll L:E::"",
~ ~a.g& 3&C:S-
'" t: _ '" co to ,,~
a~I,~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~
::2::; ~ci:J:::, _ :::':0<;
~
"'tl '" 0 '"
~ ,- ~ .", ~ ~;:"C"'" '" '" "':J
~ /. ~ D~ ~] -o"':J roD~~~ "'tl_ ~ .", ~ ~
"'" w.i p;. :::: ~"'2"Cm._ ",,~::t:: :::,~_ <:<:a:: ]"'" "CiS
",,"'" ;:;3 v... CiSc.:::_..,~_~;o;;_<::VJ ~"'"""~""'<:<: - ?;?;~
~~a~~ z ~~~_~m;:~::llm~~j"'] 3~~<-m~ ::ll~ j~~
:j~~~~c]~:~Jj~~!~~VJv~]~~~j1~~~~;~~;]~~~~;
e
e
~
e
~
.
.,
"
Q
::::::;:
o ~ v..TI ~
~ <~ ~
~~ "C 3~ c:j ~ 0
- ""'""'""'""'""'"'" _;;- 7-iiJ""'DO
~~_ ffi3C:Sroam",::ll~j &~~::t::~ "C""'~
;~~~;J~i:::]~]iji]:jj:~~~iiii
~
~
'g
~
~_€_ fJ~ _ ~-2C>' _?_ "";;;",,,,,,, .,'-''-'
:: ; ::t ::t :; ::t ::t :; :; :; 5 :; :; :; ::t :'i ; :; 5 :; 5 :; 515 ::t ::t ::t ::t
o 0 0 C '" coo 0 coo C ::> 0 0 ODD 0 0 0 D D C c~ ,~ UO .0; ,:;; v; v;
U UGVUGUUUUUUUUGUUUVVGUUIU__ _
~ v
c::l"'tl"C"'tlro53
::>:: -""""~'"
] ] ~"t -;::
",."",... "'., '-':: _ w.i
';;"","",W::ll::C::C;:~v;~~
~ D D t::e ~ :e ~ c.en ~
c.::: c.::: ~ ~.g ~ ~ i> 9. 0
V:v;J);~~~~~;~~
,
o 0
,-' U
::t g ~
u '"
>.
~ g g g
'--"-"---
C>.>-.
"5"5
oJ)
u.
"~ :@
= ~
,;5 ~
~
o
o
!
.~
6
~
o
;:;
c:
"
o
.E
!7;i
;<3
:9;
i-.<
!~
I!-o~ ~
,:, C'
:g ~
~~
OO)M
f'-O~
.,-0.,-
N~
o 0
ZOL()
,,~ CO
-- Q)
2~0)
C'il C'il
_gp~o..
"
0)
01
<l:
c:
'"
a::
'tl
..
c:
'~
'Iii
c:
o
U
..
:c
:g"ii)
.. '"
" ..
c:u..
~~
0..
~"o
oc:
~'"
, c:
COO::
.20..
"'....
~5
'"
M
'"
N
'"
E
"
o
U
"~
'0
u
..
~
~
I ~
~
.
~
~
'0
.
..
.
"~
l ~
'0
~
o 0 ,..., R 0 g cG 0" '" ;"'11
...., 0 '" "" c-. 0- '" ""
"':-00"-:-.0"'; ''';0-' "i.j":";
"-. "" ,..., 00..-. 'n 0-. -D ,,'
.'ll
.~
-~
;::;<
~€
.- .
il ~
~u
"CIg
. .
~ .
~ ~
< .
u
'" '" 0 0
- ....,,,-, .".
0- 0-......, C" nO'
~;::i ",' ~ ~
."
B~
. ~
~ .
U
~
.,
0'0-e'0':O
"-;,...,M ...:0-
"; ,~ ". ". '"
-"
:el
':;l:j
oo~o'"
~ ,
'" :;;
.
~'ll
.~
.~
=,<
~
00:>000
0__00
"
;:/-? ~~:
"
~
~~
o "'00
:i;;;d~S';~
;;~S;:;:::;::
88
"'''''."..".
0;;' -0-.0
000_00'00000
.". ..., .D 0 0 0 C 0 Of, '" ""
.".""r;..,:r;r'M."..-no-Oo-.....
'll
~
'1
.
.
~
-.
cGo-;:J:O'
gff~g
-.
.".~~~
r');i.:;'~
00 'n
t- gg
~~~~
.,
-.
'" ...,
.8;?';:f5f
OO~O
..,-..0.".",
",,'-n ;:j
..;- V rl..., ,.,."....,.,.,., r,.,..". ........."..".
a
3
R~~~~~
~~r-'~~g
888
- ~
o '0
.,.
o C ,0
iERii6
'6.; ~
~~,~
.,
:i;g ;:::o~
>.Drl',,;:t;oO-D
.,.~.,.
c a a 0 i5 g - E - .' a ~ ~ - 6 ~
"
- " - " - - < ..; . c ~ ..; " .;
- - . - D < a oc a 0 < a - - < c - -
0 0 " 0 0 ,. 2 , 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 ,
-
0 " " . " - . - - " " " " " " " " .,
. .
. ~
-;:"c
Jl..
22.c].o~~
;5:5 ::;;5-,:..
.
~
~
,,~ILI"
"'*~'::*
....,.:0,,--
< 5 "'"'5 l5
-o~~~~
8
E
~
~
~
I :;:s1:.",as
::: :il::<:
'" Vl .~ _ <-
::<:;~~3
" ~ c ] :
:L::::::;'>
"'''' """",,,,
C'iSas:r:iiiasa
13 is ::; 0 ;:;
~ ~I~ 3 ~
JLL_
~I~I~ ~I~
_ 0 0
, .
.!-..o.<:o.o.<:
::J::J ::,
;: '" =
~ I~~i ~
:>:::", -;:;;: :;;
~_vffi"~a
o o.
~ '" ~ c '" 'g 0
.::0 ::l:>:::
.:3
5 -
--
CVl
~ :::;
"';:
s
-l ~
" ".n
as ~&;'j
. . 0
~ v, 0 g -g
_..:. ~ v;:>:::
J I
~]
0"3
~.~
~ g
'--'~
~ <= ~ ~
:::;:..,'-:::;
::3.",
1~:5 2
I~~ g
: ('; 5, ~
_;:::io:L
~ ~ ~ ;;
VlI-C:I-C:
3.."
;;2 "'x
~ c
'" - ]
~ -" '"
",""",,::l
_ _ c C
Ci;;.iL:.j
,
1~I~j~
'~'::2-VO
~32
~I
~ 0
w~~
~ C _
~
" c
C3 ..:
;,:: .-=
~ ~
Z~....,
'"
I." ,
.~
= =
0;)
~ "
; ~ ~
~ ~
=;:0
" "
ct
'0
o
J
.~
"
o
~
;
'i"Z
0'0'
o
.
,
"
~
~
;:0
i?
;;
"
~ ~'
~ ~
'" 51
~-g
~ 0:
~ '-'
" 0
€~
;,:-
:;: 'f.
"^
3.2
~~
:J ~
~~
,
,
I;
I",
:c:;
"
-<
"
~' ~
c
"
"
" ::;
~~
" "
,-,::0
" "
5~
'2~
_7.
::>~
:::5
~"'t,
- "
..s ;oJ
;=!-.5
1-"-'
Agenda item No. 17D
March 10, 2009
Page 86 of 113
APPENDIX C
Credit Component Calculation
Aaenda item No. i 70
~ March 1~. 2009
Page 87 of 113
Credit Component
This appendix presents the detailed ca1clllations for the credit component. ClIrrenJly, in
addition to the capital support that lI1timately reslllts from state fuel tax revenlles. Collier
County also receive financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of these, County
fuel taxes are hsted below, along with a few pertinent characteristics of each.
1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2~/ganon)
. Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a cOllnty.
Collected in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) oflhe Florida
Constitution.
. The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to cOllnties aHer firsl withholding
amounts pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursllant to provisions of the
State Constitution for road and bridge pl1l-poses.
. The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program
within the county.
2. County Fuel Tax (l~/gallon)
. Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diescl fuel sold within a county.
. Plimary pllrpose of these funds is to help reduce a county's reliance on ad
valorem taxes.
. Proceeds are to be used for transportation-related expenses, including the
reduction of bond indebtness incllrred for transportation purposes. Authorized
uses include acquisition of tights- of-way; the construction, reconstruction,
operation, maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges,
bicycle paths, and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness
incurred for transportation purposes.
3. 1" Local Option Tax (6~/gallon)
. Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a cOllnty.
. Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
. To accommodate statewide equalization. all six cents are alltomatically levied on
diesel fuel in e\'ery county, regardless of whether a county is levying the tax on
motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate.
. Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually
agreed upon distribution scheme. or by' using a formula contained in the Florida
Statlltcs.
rinrl~Je-Oljvf:T & /\,"nci;,\te,:" Inc
February 2009
C-l
Collier County
TranspOl1ation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 170
March 10. 2009
Page 38 of 113
4. 2'd Local Option Tax (5~/gallon)
o Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county.
o Proceeds may be lIsed to fund transportation expenditures needed to meet the
reqllirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted local govemment
comprehensive plan.
o Proceeds are distribllted to a county and its mllnicipalities according to a mutually
agreed upon distribution scheme, or by lIsing a formllla contaioed in the Florida
Statutes.
5. Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax (1~/gallon)
o Tax is on every net gallon of motor fuel sold wimin a county.
o Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
o To accommodate statewide eqllalization, this tax is alltomatically levied on diesel
fuel in every county, regardless of whether a county is levying the tax on motor
fuel at all.
o Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their
municipalities.
Each year, the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relalions (LClR)
produces a document, the Local Government Financial b?{ormation Handbook, which
details the estimated local government revenlles for the lIpcoming fiscal year. Inc1l1ded in
this document are the estimated distriblltions of the variolls fuel tax revenlles for each
cOllnty in the state. The 2008-09 data represents projected fuel tax distriblltions to Collier
COllnty for the upcoming fiscal year. In me table, the fuel tax revenue data are utilized to
calculate the vallie per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the
"eqllivalent pennies" of other revenue sources. Table C-l shows the distribution per
penny for each of the fuel levies, and then me calculation of the weighted average for the
vallie of a penny of fllel tax. The weighting procedure takes into accollnt the differing
amount of revenlles generated for the various types of gas tax revenues. The weighted
average figure of approximately $1.4 million is used in the vallie per penny calculation.
Tindale-()!iver & Associates, Ine
F eblUary 2009
C-2
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
orne)
r-O~
~O~
N_
O - 0
ZDO)
~o:J
C ~
QlU Q)
-~""
-mm
-fg:2o...
c
(l)
0)
<(
...
.2
E
ltl
...
01
o
...-
11.=-
Cl
iii9
:!:::CO
0.0
ltlO
UN
0>-
_u.
-gvl
- Q)
CO;
~(.)=
, 0 ltl
U=o.
Q) <( "(3
.Q t: 't:
ltl 0 ::l
1-:;:;:2:
::l
.Qo/l
E~
.~ 1:
o ::l
X 0
ltlU
I- ...
Q)
Q)::
::l-
u.8
-0
Q)
-
ltl
E
:;:;
In
W
7 -10- 7 0- 00
~ S - '" ,..., on on M
0 0 "", '" 0 M
",' ,0 00 ~ 00 0::
" = N '" 7 N '"
..Q " - 0; "1- ;q, 7, "'.
.. l>.; N - - - - -
... ... V; V; V; "" "" '"
-
~ "
is l>.;
00 - 7 N 0- 7
N '" '" ...... on N
.s 0 0 0 "!. 0 ..,.
,0 ,0 -=i 00 00 ,;.'
-; - 7 '" 0- '" N '"
" N 0; 0, C;, 7, .......
- ..Q ~
" - 00 '" - -
E-< .;:: &S "" V; V; V; N
- '"
~
is
N - '" on on
~ 0 c; 0 c; -
6 0 6 0 6 ~
" = v; V; <A C/} Vl '"
..:i "
.... -
" -;
- '"
=
= ...
" ~
~
- ~
-"l
c ii
" " u
"
'" ";' N
i- '9 "
- - '" -"
... " - - f- OD
.. ~ "
c " ~ 0
E-< '. 0 "ii ...
'" "
"'fj Co i: ~
Co 0 -<r:
.2 u 0
c " E
3 "- '" '"
" ~
~) u "
'0 0 ..
:; ...l - - .~
0 c ;; 'S >-
v v - N Z .....
.2
"
.0
'5
~
"3
zj
.3
;>,;>,
'"""
:5 .a
OC/l
u u
.~ .g
'::::: a.
8;:)
u
u
w..
"
'"
J
.2
;;;
t::
o
0.
;!i
~
f-
"-
00
o
~'
g
;;;
~
~
~
~ ^
".0
-"""
- v
~;..=
'" 0.
:..:2~
~ ~
;:.=
.0 _
"0 5
u=
] ~
tJ ti
:e a.
() 'J)
.~
'"
u
;;
S
~IJ
~
.~ ;;.
- ~;=
.. ~ ;::;.:g
0.3
1:1 '-
c.O
v cr.
g ~
.~ ~
::; r; .,:;;; 'J)
o :::l ';)
"~E-=
.?: ~,~ E
~ ;::; "0 v
'f1 ~ 5b..:!
.~ :; e ~
::;1 u
~ - ~ ~
:g '~I'; -=
i j ~ ~[j
:.:... :.: IlJ:S
u - ~ ;;.
;J :$ :.0
~ -- 2"0
;)5-~
1
~
v
,~
u
o
~
;;:
Cd
r,
;;0-
;;. g
9 ;,
-a g
]-B
:-":.:...
Agenda Item No, 17D
March 10, 2009
Page 90 of 113
Gas Tax Equivalent Credit
A revenue credit for tbe annllal gas tax eqllivalent expenditures on roadway capacity
expansion projects in Collier COllnty is presented below. The two components of the credit
are as follows:
. COllnty gas tax equivalent pennies
. State gas tax expenditures
County Gas Tax Equ;valent Pennies
A review of the COllnty's FY 2009-2013 Transportation Work Program indicates that a
combination of gas tax revenues, impact fees, grants, and ad valorem taxes are used to fund
roadway capacity expansion projects. Collier COllnty receives a credit of 4.9 pennies for
the portion of gas tax revenues dedicaled to capacity expansion projects in the 5-year work
program and 9.6 pennies for debt service payments on the 2005 gas tax revenlle bond.
Based on discussion with COllnty staff, all bond proceeds were expended on roadway
capacity expansion projects. In addition to the gas tax and debt service, approximately $20
million of granl funds (lOlaling 2.8 eqllivalenl pennies) are being lIsed to fund roadway
expansion projects. Thus, a credit of 17.3 eqlliva1ent pennies will be given for the
allocation of funds tbe cOllnty collects in gas tax revenues and grants.
Table C-2
County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies
. Revenue
. Cost of Number from 1 Equivalent
Credit of Years Pennies(S)
.... . . .. P..ojects penny(4)
Gas Tax Revenues (2008-2013)") $35.218,000 5 $1.449.228 $0.049
2005 Gas Tax Revenue Bond Debt Service!::) $69,370.000 5 $1.449.228 $0.096
Grant Revenues (2008-2013)13) S20 000 000 5 $1.449,228 $1LQ28.
Total $124,588,000 $0.173
(1) Source: TableC-4. Item (cj
(2) Source: Table C-4. Item (aJ
(3) Source: Table C-4, Item (b)
(4) Source: Table C-I
(5) Cost orprojecls diviclt'd hy number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 4) divided
by 100,
Tindale-Olivcr & A<;;sociatcs., 111C
F ebruar)' 2009
('-4
Collier County
TranSpOliation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda It8m r,o. 17D
f'Aarch 10. 2009
Page 91 of113
State Gas Tax Eypenditlires
In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, the Florida
Department of Transportation (FOOT) Work Program was reviewed for capacity
expansion projects in Collier County for the] 7 -year period from FY 1997 to 20] 3. The six
years of "future" roadway projects fi'om FY 2008-2013 Work Proh'fam indicate a total state
expenditure of approximately $97.8 million for capacily-adding projects in the County. On
an annual basis, this level of expenditure is equivalent to 11.2 pennies of gas tax revenue.
Comparatively. the total cost of the capacity-adding projects for the six-year and five-year
"historical" periods are as follows:
. The FY 2002 to 2007 Work Plan equales to ] 6.2 pennies; and
. The FY 1997 to 200 ] Work Plan equates to 13.1 pennies.
The combined weighted average over the] 7-year total of state expenditures in the County
for capacity-adding roadway projects reslllts in a total eqllivalency of 13.5 pennies. Table
C-3 documents this calculation. The specific State projects that were utilized in the
eqllivalent penny calclllations are summarized in Tables C-5 Ihrough C-7.
Table C-3
Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion
Cost of Number Revenue Equivalent
Credit from 1
Projects of Years penny") Pennies(S)
.
Future Work Program (20U8-2Ull)(]) $97.n9.432 6 $1.449.228 $0,112
Historical Work Program (2002-2007)'" $140.704.668 6 $1.449.228 $0.162
Historical Work Program (1997-2001 )1" $94.717.412 5 $1.449.228 $0.131
Weighted Average $333,211.512 17 $1.449,228 $0.135
(I) Source: Table C-7, Total Cost of Expansion Projects
(2) Source: Table C-6, Total Cost of Expansion Projects
(3) Source: Table C-5, Tota! Cost of Expansion pf(~iects
(4) Source: Table C-I
(5) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 4) divided
by 100.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
February 2009
C-5
Collier County
rransportation Impact Fce Update Study
00">(")
",o~
~o-;-
"'-
, 0
0",
~ ~(J)
c:.c Q)
2t::cn
-roro
.gj:2:o...
c
'"
OJ
<(
>-
...
'0
('ll
Co
('ll
U
>-
('ll
3:
"C
('ll
o
0::
I
t/l
III
"-
~
:::
"C
I:
III
Co
><
W~
"'-t/l
1:...
III U
iij III
'<I' >'~
U. .- 0
~ "-
III 0'" ll.
-WI:
.Q 0
('ll ><._
I-('llt/l
I- I:
t/l ('ll
('llCo
C>~
>-
...
I:
~
o
u
"-
.!!!
15
u
M
.....
o
N
>-
LI..
I
O'l
o
o
N
>-
LI..
~
"
~
~
..Q
~
~
"'"
~
..
~
~
.-
~
0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 ""3"
-= 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
" 0 0 0 0 I ~ 0 0 00,
'l::l . 0" r-:' 0" 0 r-:' 00 0:- v-.
" t- o .". ~ N 00
- .". 0
.. ~ '" - 0 0 - "!. 0- 0-
" 0-' 0" or)
", " or) 0 v-. 0:- .n-
o. = '" 0 t- v-. '" '" N ""
~ " "" '" ~ "" "" "" ""
-=
" .. "" ""
10;- Q,l
E-<.":
'" 5
1-( ~
O'.~
...'
~-:-f:
g;~~
...""
~.,.
..... I--
I>'
~
~
" to:
" ~
~ .~ ci.
"
~ .. "
~ ::. "
"
" ;: b
= " ~ 'U
"
.. Z " '"
"'(l,l .. ~ " 0-
..: = '"
.- 'r; u
.. = " " .9
= .:;; "
" iil " o. "'"
'" ..
" " ... "
-<<'Q,l o. " "
= ;; ... .c> u
-= > " 'is
." C '"
t "'" "
-< '" '" ~
..: o.
" " ;;; " ~
'" .- "
" " ~'" :l
;-. .- " ~ "
.'... ~ " '" "
'" "'" ..
" - "- " :0- u
I'.. .. ~ "'" - -" ~
1 > ~ " 0;; " ,5
~ - u .::: "
. - " '': "'" '" "
~ .- " " 0 b
iil :a ~ "'" "-
S " ~ ~ S
"
... "'" -g 0 " "
0 '"
" ~ b 0
I,'" ::. " u '" 0;;
= ~ ~ rZ a
" " " ;2 0 >
,::: " " ... "- "
"- OJ ;; OJ] '" ""
',.. .. " .S " 0
.. " "- " 0;; -<
" ..: u ,
~ - r >
'" _ '" .~ '"
- ;; ~ ~ it ~ :l
. ..Q '" '" ..:;: "
- E Vi Co " Q
" " -.1
0 - , , c:: , ,
"
J3
>'>,
c"g
" -
0",
u "
'" -
" "
.- '0
== 0.
8~
"
"
"-
~
"
'"
'"
.5
.3
:s
13
0.
~
it
,::
~
g~~
q =< 2:1
11) ~ ()
r; ~~
;... ~ 0
-0 0.. ()
-
<-2~~
_t
~ ~'~
on ~ ~
~ --E g
a -0 [;
b ~ r;
~::.o~
o..,=: Q
'";c:-;;;
'i:J 5 ~
U U 4-<
~ ~ ~
8 ~ ~ ~
r-' 'Jl S i3
.B g'-D ;>
t ~ "f ~
<lio~O'" __ob
11) -=: ~ V'} ~ '
~ :tln :><: >.. 0 -0 'u
0~-Eo~05
~:: :n ~ ;> 'e 5;
E ~ ~.5 1 0. '"0
.- o..-=: :>< ..r::: ;... ....
.s~.-=o.-=i'3a
,~.::: ~ 5.. ~ :;0' ~
~~"E ~],~ g
'g,~-gci--g-; '0
~~202o~
]5.E'2]S-=
';;:j .... ;Q ... ...... '~
::: a Eh ;;a u
'~ ~.:: 2 ~ '5 .~
CIl x ;g Q..; ;g ~ r.fJ
gO-:::..:.:::-=.....[':j
c b~ 5 ~.:!Z B
~ 'u tr) ;5: If) "Cl '"0
~ [':j;::::; ;::: r::- 0
... ~~::: E .... ~
~u:::-~~5~
~ -8~ <.-s c [':j
="2 ;::: 1"'1 :::: :::::--
,~ ~ 2 0: 2 .3 r
PutJ)N~t::~
~ ~ .S Q..,.:: ~ ~
c: 0 co:: .....:
E ~ ';3 ~.~ ~ ';'
8~5>-~""'1j
.i'E[;~w...~~~~
5~r;-5-5-(5~
r.fJt::;""oo-'O~~
~vl1)o3 -ot;
u 2 % ~ 3 g ~ ,~. "'-
--0 _:1)_ Q:;
5 g ;> .... ~ 0 ~ (5 ~
r./J:/'J~b=f=:o..~p..f=:Uj
~~-- --~o
::::-::!.-~ ~t:.z
~
"
on
-5
'~
""
.it
0.
1:
"
.<>
OJ
=
~
~
8
!:::l
u
;;.~
~ ~
~-g
e 0
o..c:q
.;< "
i3 ;::!
~ ~
::l "
:J~
-or: ~
",C-<
~
o "
N:.J
0,",
00
00
NN
G:-B
'"
-52
= ~
t
~ 0
~ ~
€i5
'" "
0.""
o~
oD ......n
=I::i
2 C':i
::: v;
~b
0..
c: 3
s8
'"
to
~'3
~
a 6
r: .~
03
5~
o
u :;
~
~"E
"0 ~
v:::l
'"
u
]
,,;
"
'"
.0
o
~
~
<
"'l
~'"
11) ,:=,
.:::. 0
- N
q C
..!: '"
" ~
"::l ;...
.5 ~
C-<_
--
::::~
DOOM
,-o~
~O~
N~
o .0
ZOO')
~O'>
E..c Q)
$t::o
-mOl
~~o...
c
(!)
0'>
<{
Ul
tl
"
'0
~
0-
c
o
'iij
c
'"
c.
><
W
>.
-
c
"
o
u
~
"
l.l'l=
'-'8
~I
'lilE
I- e
Ol
o
~
0-
'"
~
o
s:
~ 0
R~
"I ~
:g::::l"
~;;;~
~~~3D~,~5g~g g
r-: r-: r-: 00.,.70-." =<5 -d -.6 -6 Nor; 00 ,,_;
_I'- >oC'<>:>r-<r> roC>D 0'
\A;3 ;;."..~ O'":J ~::; V; ~.:;; \A \A
-- \AlA VI
~ ~ ~
;;~~v;
~~:.1
~~~
o
M~
'"
'"
g8%Si:
'= '; or)
Nc::or-
_ 0 ~
~~~
g: ~
- ~
~
~~:SV;
~ . .
_ ~ N
-~
i ~
~~
'"
'"
_ ~ N:::> tr,
;;:~~\A~
;:::.....;.,:
r:::<r,or)
Q\"iVl
~-
- ~
~
......::;.
~~
~.,:
;c,",1
~ C'
~~
~
"
~
~
if:
~
'"
'"
N
e ;;
t2
e .;:,
Qu.;
~ .9 S
c~
o "
O!
~
~
o
Q
....
'"
'"
~
)0-
IL
I-
o
C
IL
......o-r-o
"'N-<A
~ .,
",-i"<i
:::;,0'.......
or, 00 N
\A....; .
VI IF,
"
1;..,>-
I'B
v.
" -
" 0
I~~
" e
0' '" 'r, C C' oc_
"'""r-C..".7"'"
O'-NOOCr-oc
or; 0'"0-: d""';..,j
r- "I cG or, r- N
...., ,.., or, VI ...., r-
-:...,.... !,<)
~ ~
OM
~ -
~~
oCr:
c,
-, ~
...-{..,f'
~ ~
~
o
"
l
.no-oo 000001"-
"'.....\A.O,.,.,CC\AVlO<>QO
""-<0 00'00 "'T="
""'0'. 00,..)..0"" 0004';
0-.0."..... N_
,.,., VI '.0 _ _ ",-.e
r-.: ,r;\AIA ....;,..;
\A.... D'l M
~
::> ':;;'_0
0"",00....
0=0:::>0
'-6~0cC
<"'.1-"''''''
\AlA'"
~
70 0":t""00",,,"
:::~g8;:z~""g;:]
88~~""0 ~;i
.0,...10'" N 'r,
....;,,-;0:.""'''''' ",-,
\A\AlA \A
~ N
;C::::g
;::&:i~
0''''t'''T<A
..,fVlVl
~
", ~
g~
N
~~
e::: 0.~ ~ <1"_'
....1 ~ ~,
.....; ,,-,-.0
"10'00
'.C;<AVl
o
o
-
-
gj u
~ u
" 0
.::::: ~-'
:_~ 1
6
~
'0
z
- <r. 'r, - --
..,- 0' 0. "'1"""'"
:;v;~~~::s
.g 5 ~ 'gl ~
'C
1t ~ ~ e ~
Q::>::::::::::::::::t
~cG~c:j
~I~ ~I~ ~ ~
':..:3.:3':__
~ ~ ~i~ ~ <:
lI: ~ ;':, ~!~
~ ~ii:
~~
E-
g
o
"
~ ~
"
~ c
:' 8
~~
~~
~
-g -
~~
21~
{i.-C
~c;; ::;
u::::::::t-
~~~
O~
c,
NC-:""
"'-',0'8
v::;;~
o
_00
<AiAQ<;
:! g ~ ~;;; g,
~
~
a~
g C
C .S: .2
~__<;;uu
: i ~
~ :> c
530,-,
~
~7
~v:
_:::!
":!"::l CO
~I~ .g
':i:L~ R:iS
o "
~~::::::
s::;'-'~
~ ~ '(3 _ CO
;>- ;..., Z p ;::
rJlV: '''=-t;
Ii:; b - Cl ,;:
"" "~
: S- ? OJ ""
o :s c:;; 0
~ ~ t; ~ 60-
_:::' -c: "I
:3 ~ - ]
:> C "'....:;; - 2
v:..;' _ ;;...:
2 d ~
~x
V:;v:.J
~ry;h"<t
-''-'~~~
"
~ ~
;:; ;:;
0=>000....
;A~_<A<A....
00 ~
00::;; 0:
<AN '-c
<A or,
N
M
~
gg~Vlg
'--:00- ..;
"10- N
- <A =
~ ..;
;;;
o
V.
",
o
!':
~
C
o
~
e
V
~::;:' c-,
O;A or,
8 ~
"i M
~ ~
~ ~
c:
~
::0 C ~ ~
VIlA".,.,...,
~
..
".
~
~
"
~
o
~
~
"
~
.
~
'"
"
~
:3
~
~
"
3
"
I
.;;
<g:
~ g
~~
=t:;2
~ '"
5 ~
>~
..... g
:: Q
~~
E. ;:
~
,~
;;;-g
o
Xx
o
~ 9
~~
r- "
:]
!i3
i.~
I~
<
I~o
,,0
1-_ c.:;o
13':'
!i ~
i~~
j'-"-
00)(")
c-o~
~o~
,--^ N_
.0
0",
~O)
E..c: (1)
$;::0)
-"''''
"':2;<l.
~
iii
'"
<(
.i!l
"
"
"e-
o..
"
o
'iij
"
'"
0.
)(
W
~
"
::l
o
()
-
~
<0'0
u()
" I
:OE
'" '"
....0,
o
a:
'"
-
o
;:
....
c
C
N
N
C
C
N
>-
U.
....
o
o
u.
"" OJ'..., 0" a '~-'I'" 00 '" 00 00 "" ~18 0 0-. .", '1" <t- 0 "" <:) 0 "'"
<:) 0- c- "" r, ..., n ""''-, 'n"'" ,,.., <'I ..-, 0 ..". 8 - 0'-. -.0 "" r' ~
,..,..., 'rL '" ,- a "" "" 00 ..". rI 0 0 0 0 .,. .,. 00 0 00 co "" \C
-c ".) 01;"'; ~,..; ,-~ 6 0-"...., '"".,; '-0"";"";"; 0 6 ....; 0:"';""; ri ..,; oC 0-. 0- '"'..,;
~~:~~ S8~~~~:~:~~~~~~~~~:~a~3;a2~
~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a~
~
8~~~~~~~~~g""~~~~~~~~~*~~~~g~ "":~~
N"; ,~~ ..,; ..,; ~~~~
~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~~~
= o~
N ~ 4"<t-
~ ~
~
~~a~~~~~~~~~a~;~~~~~s _~a~~~~
.... 00 "" 0 ,... 0- 0- 0"" .,.
i~ ~~~; a~ ~ ~~
M ~
~
~
OOOo-ON
"""""''''''0-
"" r, .,.
r;f
"" :i
g~gS~~~~~~~~~:~~~~2~:~~~~~~~~~~~~
....0- ~,,,,,rl~ ~ ~B~ ~. ~~~'.
I~ ~ r,3 IA* ~ ~ ~~ : '. _
~~ ..., ~ ..., ~
~
~
i~~~~~~:~;~~~~~~Sg~~~R~~8~IAS~~~~~
.... ~ 1A~~rr~..,;....; ~~6 ri"'; ~~ ~
2 ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ...,~ :...,~ ~
~ ~ IA ~
~
~
g~~~~~:~g~~3~~~~S~~go~~~S~SSS~~S~
.... M"";rr~~....; ~,.,.; ~~; 2
~ ~ ~~EJ~""~"'~ ~ ~
~ ...,<A...,..., ~
~
g~~~~r.~ggg~~5~~~g~~~~S~~SS~S~S~Sg
~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~g ; ~
g ~-~~~~~~~~ ~ :~ ~
M ..., "" ~ ~ v,
~ ~
~
~
00
~
~
'!
~
"'-'" _._,_ 0
~ v ~ ~ 3
"' -oj" ?; ~ ~
]~~~'~i~~
t 8 ~-~ ~ c ~ ] ]
~ '" 0 '0 ~- '" "'" ill;::, '" ~_
;:; ~ 1.:.1 if!;: ~ '" ol.~
~~~o~;;tc:,;~oo~
O;~~ii1J~j~
.. _;;; c:: ~'~ to 1iJ .2
~ g ~ E " .9 ~I~ :;
~ Q :3 ~.:L 5;1 E ~
~;~ "'c::",~vv
~.... gO";; v c:: :; :;
~Jj""gcSg~~~_
~ - - - - u u
="i" -?' ~.". ~ ~ '<t
_VJ:l::lf; v.. v, '-'l 0 Olf:.
v.. :;; J] - ::; ::J ::l U <..,
.~
.~ ~R" ~
~ ::; ~
~ ~
~o;:j
o 0
o 0
~~
,,::5
~~
,
~
~
~ ~
0:; u"" U E
c.. _~*_
v u '-' Vl (lJ "' -2
<:;:0 2 "'.;,
:;; '" ;;;,_ u '-'__
~ _ :E ~ .0 ~ - {J
n:; ~ ~ n:; i: 3j 2:l "
C::C::C::C::C::o;oC::
o::l~~o;:j":':~~~
g '" ~ ",:3 G '"
....l...J....l ""....l
""?" "'" '-c:l_
" "" ~ .: CJ
<<<<< <:i:
n _
lrl:~ ~i:I' ;': < - ~
. 'f)V)'f) V)
::z:z.:::"'''''''
~
-
~; ~ ~:;, ~
"
~
,
~
,
o
"
~
"
~
o "
"" "
:s1:l::
_ :X 2::
c:: "v 0
g,v ,;: ~ ,-::
X ~ - 0 = ~
.", '" ~ ~'.5 ~ ~ 5
~~~ ~~~ ~~.g in....
~~" ~~fv~]~~" ~~
"~~ ","o"'o~g~~~ ~=
=_~i~. ~~!~~_:2!_~] ~~
0' "'O~O<>2,,1iJVl =.g]'"
ii~~ii~~~:};~~:Ji
~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ g _g ~ ~ e ~ .g .g c ] ::-
~~g~~avv'~3 ~~ ~3~
;;g~~~~2~~~~d~~!J
o
~ ~ !
" ~
- g.g~~ "",,,~
;,]~~~~:] ~:(I)j~
~~<\d:~j ;:;~~2g _ ~ =~ ~
~::3 ;;;~30~"~~~3.;:; 3
~~lii~~~cc~~~ 2
o
W
~
o
~
o
o
3
o
,
~ ]
&.Vl'" .9
po: .; :X ~
'--':x~Q
., ,.g
~:]~
:.1:' O::C: "
~ ;; ~ ~
oj::"=::,::
-u
'1''''OGe-
:.I:':x.::::r:t::
~ VJ v, U
_. 1 I"
~]]: ~
:2 2 ~ 0 ~
h ~ _~ ~ '"
~w2l
~~~"::l
C:::l:::l"'"
"'-"'-::..<
;..-;
~~~
_ _ _
-..., "'~,
~S:~
~:;;;;:::;:
:!:!
~ ~
c,
--, ~-
_ t~ "<t "<t co or 'r, '"
OCo.r,,^>D'"''''''
."..". 't', c_ ~ ,..
;;;:.". "<t."..".
Ol~ ~
~i~ ~
-crl-cr ~
..
!;,,>-,
Ie]
16 if.I
I'" .
, -
.!:!.a
1=0:3-
~ ~
~
u
"
"
oS
2
..
"
o
~
.
"
'"
'"
"
,
"
"
~
~
.
"
~
o
2
.
-a
< .~iJ
E ;.>
~ 8
o .
d:-g
-'" ;;
1;; '"
~. ~
~!
::5 ;
0"
~ -~
I~ 2
n
~!
;;:;.'!O
t~
~-
. "
o 1:l
"" "=
-v !"
6 .]
"'" ~
v ;;::
2 =
g~
v: V
_0
;<
I"
,-"
!~
'u
"
<
'~
!,~ g
Ie N
Ijl
-~
00)("')
,-O~
~O~
N~
o .0
ZO",
~m
E.c (\)
22::n
-roro
~2o..
~
;;;
OJ
<C
In
U
"
'0'
~
"-
<::
o
'iij
<::
<ll
0.
><
W
,.,
E
::l
o
U
~
"
,...,:
u8
~I
~E
I-:;!
Ol
o
Q:
'"
~
o
::
M
~
o
N
~~ z o~o~o OO~O.~OONON
og~~~ 8~~og~8gR.g~8ggg8~
]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~
~ ~.~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~
~~~~g~~8~~~g~~8~~~~~~~~~
~ ci 0 ci - 0 N
N ~ 8 2~ ~ ~
~ ~ ci ~ ~ ~
'" N ~ N
~ ~
i::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~
N ::;.-0 r- 0 Ir,
:::. ~ ~ ~~ ~
=: ~ ~ "l
N~; ~
i::
_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S~~~~~~
a ~ ~ ~~ $
~ "".... ....
i::
~s's's'~~s'~s's'~~s'~~s'~~~~s'~q~
N ~oo ~ 0 .00
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~:~
N ~ ~""
i::
~gs's'~s's's'3g~gg~.....g~~~g~~g
oS 0 ,ooqq ~qq~ q ~
~~ 3~oo~~ g~3N g ~
g~ ~~....~oo ~~~~ ~ ~
... ;;;;""""
i::
~s'g....~~s'g~s'~g ;;:;S;N
~ ' ~ ..., of 0 r-i ~ or; ...; 0
r;"" ;5;g-~~~"'
0';' C - ....
N :;:;:...,
i::
o~ ooco""
"" ~...,...,....""-
-i ;:-:,' ~
~;:-; ;;
~
~
"
1i
"
~
.,
o
o
N
>-
l1.
I-
o
Cl
l1.
.
~
e
.
~
o
:l :j\1l
~ uC~ ,,;; =_!."O
3 "c ~ (; J, - ., <':::
L H 11~ l ~ ~ I ~ 1
~~-~23 ~ ~ ~ 3_
~c ~~~ ] ~ ~N~~ aU
Q~"",~ ~>~ ~! ;~r'~ __
~z.aall>s ~~3B_ -~~u
i~. ~~.~1!'.3: ~i~~JJ;
gJd~~~~;i::~ ?I~~~ "~
E ue~~-~u ~~~ f,3~~g~~~
~~~:~~~~~~~~=~~~~g~;g~
. .0.000000..,-, E """'1""'-"""""'(/"''--- ~
~c~~~~~~r-2i~~~~~~~6 ~r-
~ > ~i
g. ~;; g-
'...- v v ~.
_11 ~ I I ~I~ , I
i Imll'!;j~ ~ 1~lnl~ ~I; ~I~!j I~ ~
~~~~~y~~~~~J~~:l~~~~~~~
jI.~.~ : J i iIH.',~ ~ ~ ~IIH ~U ~,H ~I~)I
11~ :;::J; .,. ~~ E ~ e e ? 1: J: jl~l~ 2 ~ e .E: i:
- NY' 3 - :J '1::2 "I"' 0 " ~IO 8 ~ ~~I!'
'" ;;;t ~. :;:; :A 0'. g -:J '2 [;J
; ~I~ ~ .,,- : ~ ~~ig ~ 0 8 - r- ~ 0' ~) '" :;11;.'"
0..-/- __~JI"""""''''- .........,...,.1...-
"
I;.,;>,
i '5 'g
oriS
1'::1:
I_~ .a
I~ ~
(;~
! L.:.,
w
o
J
~
o
~
"
o
~
c,
Q
"'
~
Ir
13
I
~
~ ~
;; g
~ ~
.c_
- "
-'" :;;
o 'fl
~ 0
'2 ,~
;;:.::;
::S ;;
::: ce,
0;::;:;
5 (;
f~
co "
- w I
0 ,-
g 0 -
"
~ " I-~
I g " I~
0 " I ~
,
I " ic<l
-" ;; ~ ~
5
.. ~ :~ N
" 0:; ~'
vo '> , ,
-= 0 I~ ~
z 1'-
,-
OJJr:0
~o~
_~o..,.-
N~
.0
0",
~O>
E..c Q)
2~0l
-Cl)Cl)
{g:2:D..
c
(l)
OJ
<(
Q)
>
('il
...
I-
Q)
-
('il
-
III
...
Q)
-
c:
Cl
c:
"'C
::l
C.l
><
W
I
0)>>
, C.l
U c:
Q) Q)
:is '(3
('il'-
I-ffi
Qj
::l
IJ...
Q)
"(j
.c:
Q)
>
...
o
-
o
:iE
Q)
Cl
('il
...
Q)
>
<l:
@ ;,e. ~ ~ ;f:
~ '" 0 0 0
- 00 "" ."
@ ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0
..,. 0' ~, 0" 0'
= 0 M '" ""
..... '" '" '" '"
@
,...
-
..
;..
-
~
~
~
~
""
~
~
, ~ =
;!l 3
;; ~
= "s
r..
e ~
." ~
= =
.. ~ .:: I~
Q,l. ~ I]
OIl": a
.. =
~
~ on on on
." ..,. 00
..,. '" ,..:
OJ vi' '<i -
-0; ." .....
..... -
!;' N
"
>-.>-.
"'."
- =
~ -
OC/J
U u
t5 ~
,- ."
= Q.
8::>
u
v
""
u
~
g.
H
.2
E
-
o
Q.
:!1
@
-
,...
r-- '" "" "- N '" '" "-
"" - - "- '" '" '" '"
N 00 r-- "- 00 "" 0 ... ~
00" '" "" '" ",' '<i 00 .... >
'" "" ~ "" "" 00 00 "
r-- 0 '" '" 00 :c
oC '" .... ",," oC .... 0
'" "" N 'C 00 '" '" ... ,...
00, N" M ... "'- r-- '" .,:
0: N ..... M N" 0 vS
00 '" 'C N N 00 '" "
M, M, "". '" ~ 9
",' 1l "
~
~ ,...
" "
r-- '" '" '" 'C " g
r-- 0 r-- 'C ... "
'" 0 00 ~ ^ 13
",,' "," vi' .... .; .8 >
"" "" M '" 'C '5 " 0
.>D~ '" '" '" ... " a
'" '" oC .; ",' '" U
N r-- '" .... 5' 3
~ 0 "!. '" r-- ...
d.' oC ...; 0 N - "
M, ~ ~ "
M N '" ... '"
~ = u
.:: 0
OJ d ~
." " .9
a ~ x
'"
= ." '"
0 r-- 00 .... ~ '" ~ .E
r-- 0 '" ~ = '" 'C "
'" r-- "', '" 0 "', '" "" 5
....; "," ;f, V "i -< ','
- '"
- '" - - '" '" >, 0
~ 0
0 '" 'C = '" .... . "
",,' oC "i r.. M ....; '" " 0
r-- '" 0 ... ~ '" 00 ~ ""
Co! .... N '" .... "
N ,< 0: ...; ,..: 0 "i e "
~, .n N ... r-- '" 13
" '"
M M "", ~ ~ ""
N ~ " "
= "' a
.:: d ^
OJ .9 ~ I~
" ~
" -
~ ~ 0
"" ....
e v ,
" U !~
,... - !.u
'0 0 Cl
OJ OJ >= 0
:is ~
~ ~ ~ ~
= = ~ ~ C\l <(
a: a: ~ t- '8
OJ OJ '" :5 Cl '"
'~ .~ .~ (l)
OJ ; OJ ; 0 0 > 0
~ ~ .Q ~ ~ .Q vi ~ CIl '"
~ = ~ ~ = ~ q N
<( a: ., -( a: ., ::i '":t: a; '"
> () v -
~ ~ ... ... ... ... '"'
~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ 9 ~ -;:; =
-0; -0; ~ :l ] ~
is is is :; :; is 0 E 0 .D
,... ,... 0 -< "
~ CIl ""
OO)M
~O~
:'-0__
, N_
O .0
Z'='r-
~'"
<=-
-- QJ
22cn
-roro
~2o...
<=
QJ
D1
<(
I
ell
-
ell
C
"0
CIl
-
ell;=
Gi CIl
a::c.
>-
"OI-
l::: CIl
ell_
l/) .!:1
CIl..c:
:: CIl
:2:>
Ol:::"O
.....-l:::
, "0 ell
~:~
->0
..cellO)
ell ... CIl
1-1--
ell
~()
l::: >-
ell ell
U; ;:
.- ..c:
CO)
CIlJ:
.!:1 >-
..c:llJ
CIl
>
ell
:l
l:::
l:::
<l:
.
l . ~
~I ~U
" ~ ~ Q ~
z!!!~E=""
, ~~~~tj
..J"lOI:ll:i.
I ,', ~ ~ H . ~
,.:\ ;:; r.Il.~o 8
I 0 ~
1-<.: !ill
j':'<'iZ__ ~ Q\'" .~..J
I'c"::':.' fJ) 101" ~:::1
I ~~~.~~
~U<1ol101
II ~,,- ~~
:,- 04-
~
Q
i'~
gg
=.
.~
Q
U
~~
~~.~:
~;:~~
e,:l..J=-=>
~~o.e:
~"'
,
8 ,
....,:;
~
Q
~.~.
j~
~~
~~
<.
~l:
=.
q
~.>
S~
,,~
>~
ca~
~>
~<
u~
~ ='
!;; ~:'.::-
Q>'-
~.
"
~'<
;;
>
"
<
"
~:
<
,
I
Iol'.",
..
0-.1='"
Iol-d-:J
=IIlU
~"-
o~::
~~
~
~
~
"
.
~~
~"
ou
_ ~ t;
~
u~
~.
~ <
~u
~
o
,
;;
!
~
.
~
>
n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~N~
~~:~~~q~~~~oqq~~~~qq~~~~
~WrnW~rn~N~OrnW~~~rn~_NNM~OW
~~n~nM88~~~~~~o~~~~ ~~~~
~_ -~. 'ri~d~ ~~~~
"'~ ....~
NN ~
~~~~~~~2M~~~~~~~bm~~~~~$
~M~~~~qW~N~~~~q~qrn~~q~~ .
",~M~N~~~~~W~~~~~~~~~~~""~
- ~~NNm~ NNrn
a:ia:;
~~
~~~g~~~~:g~~:n~S~~
~~~~~~~~ri~=~ri~ -~~~
~~~~~~gg~~~;~~....~~g
-~._~~~~
",wmnoa:>C(>"'~N
;;;.:::;~::~~~2~
"<to..,.",
'" '" WN
..,.-..,. ~~
W~WO""NWOM..,.a:>""~w",arnMOWC(>M~orn
....~~~~~~g~~~~N~R~w~~~R~~~~~
~~~~tii~g~~~g~g~~gg~g~~~g~ri
~_~o ~_OW
NN ~~
~N"''''"<tO'''' _WWN....rn~w a ..,. ww~ow
~ ~"'~~~rng~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~
~~MM0~m~dori_MNd~~~NNomM ~~
___ MM~_MM..,...,.C(>~~~_ "'....~g
W <.0 ~ 0>
aMwW"<tMON....OWOMOM_"'O>WO...."'~"'N 0....
~ ~0>~~~~~..,.~~o~o2~~~0>~~~~w~~
.ti~M~~~~~d~rn<.O~~~~~dti~~ ~
"'a:>~~~n~~~~~~....~~~~~~_~g~~
~-~'m,,", ~~dro
O>rn <D'"
<D<D~M...."'"<t ONO OM""OO>Mmm"'NCO~WCO N
~~~~ ~w~6~g~~M~~~2g~~~N~~~<.OW
rin~ ~N~~m<.O~~rororo~~a_~
NO '<t..,...,.N
""co ..._
~~~~~~~~~gQ~~~o~~~~~
~MW"<tW,,", M,,",N~""W""~ cow
- - - ~~~N~ri~~ti~~~.~
ON
<.Om
~N
NN
"':::'
~~~g
m.
00>
gj~
~~~M~~R~~~~~0~....N~~~ON2~w~~
~~""MWOW M<O<D~ONW"<tO>O'<t~WM<D~"''''
NNwomo~M~w~ro~~Nro~roN C(>m~ro
NNO a-~~~w~m~~"'ornw "'O><O~
-~NNNN"',,",NN<O"" w....~~ wwm"<t
... . -Lli'<.ci' ~N .f",-
~~ "'....
w"'W~W~~"'<D"'W"'~~W~W"'<D"'W~W~~"'W'"
0000000000000000000000000000
~~:::;;~:::;;~~~:::;;:::;;:::;;~~~g:~~~~g:~g:~~~g~~ -
N
'0 ~
$ R ....
at.rJ "lo
g ~ '" W
..,...f
~N
~w
o
o
~
~ ~
" 0
lij ~ '"
~ -~ ~
~ ~ : ~
~ 2 ~ I
:- Q. ~ u'
.og ~ ~ ~
1;;1;; if; ",-g
:: ~ ~ ~> ~;;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.2 w '0 -0 ::
'" ~ g ~ 0
~~ g ~ ~~
~~ --'-~ ~ ~.~
~ a _ ~ ~ *
>-- OJ iii .,; ~"
'iG g D.. ~ '6 ~ ~
E ~,. c .E a'i .s
~~ : ~~E~
~~ ~ 8~~rt
;. :s ~_ ~_ ~ lli
i~ ~ ~~
~~ OJ ~~~~
"'0'" o~ ~~~~
:'iG~ @~ ,,~~
~~g co- OJ~~-[
~~~ ~" ~_i~_:j
~~ 0 ;3 ~ -
~ ~ ~ c Q ~ ~ .E 12
~~Ul ~ iE~*s
is ~ ~ '" '" OJ :-.!:' g
iH HHI!!
"5" ~:S>'_o~~OJ
i " ffi . ~
OW~ 8.~i~~:g:s
!n B~iJ:~
!If ~::'o~~
'!;'S2 ,g~~~~ffi>
g~~ ~~~E g
t::<<:R",,]~.~ffig~~
3. it 1::! i; r.; ",'" <l: ;
;~~~ -~g~~~~
"
o
,
.
,
NO
.oci
_ N
OW
WW
. ~
N N
NN
-------
(.."''''"''''.....00
>.>.
E-g
~ -
oV!
U "
" '"
~-o
_ "-
O::J
U "
~
u
~
".
..s
.s
'"
t
5-
;!J
a
"
'""
u
~
:i
"
;;
'u
0
~
~
<
"1
'"
; '"
'"
5 N
~ >.
a
'ii ~
] 3
v
c- o..
,A.gerlda Item No. 17D
March 10, 2009
Page 98 of 113
APPENDIX D
Ad Valorem Credit
Ags.nda item No. 170
March 10. 2009
?age 99 of 113
This Appendix presems the calculations used to delermine the credit due to ad valorem tax
revenues being used to fund capacity expansion projects. The following sections provide
an explanation of credit calculations.
Residential Land uses
In detennining the ad valorem credit for residemial land uses, the study evalllated Ihe 2007
single family home sales and detemlined the market value of a new home. This process
involved some adjustments to the size and unit price of homes to account for outlying
values. More specifically, the following adjustments \vcre made:
. Home sales data from Collier County Propel1y Appraiser parcel database for 2007
indicated that the average home size in Collier County is 4,067 sqllare feet. The
home sales data also reflected that the average cost per square foot was $168.84 for
this grOllp of homes. Tbe multiplicalion of the average size by tbe average price
resulted in an average market price of approximately $686,615 for a home 2.500 sf or
greater.
. Since the average size of the homes for the sales data was more representative of
larger homes. the relationship between taxable values of existing homes for less than
1,500 square feet. ] .500 ,., 2, 4999 square feet. and grcater tban 2.500 square feet was
lIsed 10 develop a stratified credit per square foot. This approach was lIsed to be
consistent with the tiered single family residential land use. The cost per square foot
that resulted fi-om tbis analysis is the less than 1,500 square foot category is estimated
at $104.68 (62 percent of the S! 6R.R4). 1,500 - 2, 4999 square foot category is
estimated at $118.19 (70 percent of!be $168.84).
It sbould be noted that the ad valorem revenues used toward transportation capital projects
is a fixed amollnt and not a percentage oftbe County's ad valorem revenlles. As presented
previously, over tbe next five years and beyond. Ibis amount will be limited to
approximately $6.0 million per year. Table D-l presents the projected ad valorem
contriblltions of a new bome (2,500 sf or !,.'feater) over a 25-year peliod, begilming with tbe
2008 market price of $686,6! 5. Given tbat tbe dollar amounl thaI goes to transportation
projects is not going to increase, the portion of the ad valorem taxes paid by a new home
that are used for transportation capacity projects will be declining. Under the homestead
cxcm.ption rule, the annual increase of the taxable value ofa home is limited to three
percent until it is sold. Tbe percent decrease in tbe annllal tax payments of a new bome is
ca1clllated as the difJ'crence betwcen the bome vallie increase (3 percent) and the overall
taxable property value increase (14 percent). Tbe resulting I-mil taxes are broughl to
Tind::df'-OJiver (l\~ A"'0ri81t'S, fnc
f ebruary 2009
D-l
CoHier County
Transp0l1ation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda item No. 17D
March 10, 2009
?age 100 of 113
present value based on an interest rate of 4.5 percent, which is consistent with the interest
rate at which the COllnty currently borrows. Table D-l also provides the portion of the 1-
mil collections that would be used toward transportation capital expansion projects and the
total credit per sqllare foot.
Table 0-1
1-MiI Credit Calculation for Single Family Home land Use
(Based on Market Value)
Revenues generated from I-mil(])
Annual ad valorem revenue that goes to transportalion capaciti2l
Average home price(3)
Annual increase in countywide taxable valuesl4l
Annual allowed increase in taxable home values(5)
Net increasc(~)
$82.791,002
$5.985,800
$"86,615
14%
""
J..
11%
Percentage of Millage Used for Transportation Capacity Addition Projects(7)
7%
Value Value lJscd Ad Valorem Present
Year Taxable Market for Credit l_MiITax(8) for Transportationl") Value(IO)
2008 $686,615 $686,615 $686.615 $687 $48 $46
"009 $43 $40
"010 $39 $34
2011 $35 Si2G
2012 $32 $25
2013 $28 $22
2014 $26 $19
2015 $23 $16
2016 $21 $14
2017 $19 $12
20]8 $17 $10
2019 $15 $9
2020 $14 $8
2021 $12 $7
2022 $11 S6
2023 $10 $5
2024 $9 $4
2025 $8 S4
2026 $7 $3
2027 $7 $3
20')8 $6 $2
"029 $5 $2
2030 $5 $2
2031 $4 $2
203" $4 $1
20~.i $.4. $1
$452 $326
Square footage{lIl 4,067
Credit per square foot $0.08
Interest Rate( I~\ 4.5%
Tinrlale-Oliver & Ass()ci(\t~<::.; loe
February 2009
D-2
Col1ier County
TranspOIiation Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item r\lo. 17D
March 10.2009
Page 101 of 113
(]) Source: Collier County Transportation Planning Department
(2) Souroe: Tab1cC,4, Item (e) divided by 5
(3) The 2008 taxable value is determined as explained on page D-1 of this report.
(4) Average increase in total taxable values between] 999 and 2008 in Collier County
(5) Pennitted rate of annual increase in taxable value of homes under the homestead exemption rule
(6) Annual increase in countywide taxable value (Item 4) less allllual alh\-ved increase in taxahle
home values (Item 5)
(7) Annual ad valorem revenue (Item 2) divided by the revenues generated from] -mil (Item])
(8) Average home value (Item 3) dh'ided by 1,000
(9) I-mil tax (Item 8) multiplied by the percentage dedicated to tmnsportation capital additions (Item
7). TIllS amount is reduced by] ] percent (Item 6) annually to account for the fact that the
portion that is used to\',!ard transportation capacity expansion projects will be decreasing.
(10) Prescnt value of the ad valorem for transportation (Item 9) hased on an annual interest ratc of 5
percent (I tcm J])
(11) ,1\ verage size of a home hascd on 2007 sales
(] 2) Consistent with the interest rate for the 2005 Gas Tax Revenue Bonds
Non-Residential Land Uses
Table F-2 provides an explanation of how the ad valorem credit was calculated for non-
residential land uses. It should be noted that the I-mil credit calculations for these land lIses
represent broad estimates based on recent sales in Collier County as available, and the
ConslI1tant's experience in othcr jwisdictions and knowledge of the industry.
Tinoflle-Oliver & A ""ociat("<.;. Tne
February 1009
D-3
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fcc Update Study
OQ)M
",0
~O~
.N.......
o
0",
~~O
~.r::~
mOO)
-'(00)
~2d::
"
Q)
en
<l:
In
..
In
=>
'C
c:
'"
...J
..
:;:l
"
..
'C
'iij
..
'"
N~
00
..z
:Co
"'~
1-"
o
~
:;
"
..
u
'"
'C
..
U
~
~
, ,
','
" ;"
,/ ':
~f'~'c'"
",
,,' ,',
E~".'
~~~,~
,i: ,'.
~:'
~-
_;0
~
:3 ~
=u
I-
N
--
:a
~
~
v
~ ";,
i ),
, ,.:: "
~ ""'. .,,; :::;.:
:ci = j
= ~ -
~ .; -=
~.:>...:t~
. ~,':;
", :5 ,<
"
~ :'
_:
",
,
So>
;,
...J
"l
I-
'<'-"
d
d
..,
C
.
E
o
E
2.
"
'"
;;
..,
c
.
"
13
E
"
0.
"
,-"
-
'0 ~
I::': 2 ... g u
I:.": ~~~ ~_.g ~
1::1:',; E ~ ~ ~ ~ ]
I:j::"~~~ ~~ g
1:,:1:,: .g ! ~ ~.I ~
~ ~ ~ ::= u ~
~~~ ~~u_,~~
.:=> ~ g. :a ~'v, ~
o~~ "';g5 :3
~-2':: ~~w""!- i
-~ 15 13 ~ ~ ~ '0 ::l ~
E'O<iiE ~>~~'21!
u; 1A '';. d .<::...; .tij-'2
~.s '!l :g u ~ .~ ~ 'a ;;
~ ~t '" .~ '2' :. .g ~ ~ ~
~g~e~b\3<'$::=3
",~~~t::~~;i Ii!!!
~ g g, c !5 .~ [3 <ii .2
.~og~i32]Eo
G:l~~~~~A~~
Ii
~ ~ ~
~O~Q~O
g<.8 a-<2 ~<2
5~~~g~
~ ~~ ~~ ~
~&~gMg
.tijo~g~~
~o :JJ", UJn
e:;:; e fA e fA
e '0 ~ 'c ~ 'a
o;l <L> o;l U o;l ....
;~g~g2
i3 :> ~ :> iJ ;;
-~&.~~.~~
~, <L> _ U ~ <L>
L.I.l ~ :l'] ~ J3 ;;
o
;;;
00
~
o
o
o
"
.,
~
"
13
2
~
~
~
;:;!,
v.
o
~
is
o
".;
~
v.
c
13
2
~
i
.
3
13
~
:::(
~
c
.
..,
c
.
E
o
2
u
"
0.
jj
'Co
~
v.
"
~
~
~
v.
.,
v.
n
v.
.,
~
I
91,"1 ~
o. is
v, 0
~ ~
Vl Vl
o
~
~
'n
~
v.
E
E
"
~
?
E
1"11 ~
II~I ~
~I':
s
o
"
~
M
~
:;:
o
o
-,
.....i
,',
v.
~'ri
.....1.....1...,
VlVl';'!
"
o
ri
v.
~ 00
N -
VlVl'"
9
is
"
5
....r
~
v.
00
00
00
""';0'
I~ v;
M "
~~
]
-
o .
~ ~;"::::
~
o
d
6' z:
<L> -, 0
-;~~
.23~
r-ZJ~
.~ ~ ~
:> C!tr:!.
~8~
,
'-'
o
I
I'
I.
1/
5'
0'
00
,:i:i
000
'-D....c '-D
VlVlVl
.,.~~
v.~ ~
0_0
000
000
0'0'0'
'r,,,, 'r,
~v. ~
E E
<L> <L> i:i
.., ~..,
~ ~ ~
~
> ~
g~
'O~
2-
<3"3
~ c
z
a ~
" "
~ :g
~2
o
,"
~
..,.. < 0 :.1, 9,
:::: z:i!.:), :;,;;-,
c
o
~
~
.
z
o
o
o
"
'Co
~
"
'2 >--.
;;-g
.~ Vi
u ~
"'.
u
U .
" ~
~.s
" '0
g, ~
u U
~ ZJ
~ >,
;.> E
U 0
:g~
E~
~o
v
C
? -5
;: ~
en 0
~ E-
u "
~~~~
E 0 ~"O :;
c<l'~ ;::: U'':
-t 0:::' '3 ~
~~~~~
2u ~ '0 ;-."":;J
.~ ~ @ ~
(/) '" u U
;.> (!) ~.2
.....::I.;:;:5t-::..;
:z
~,
~
~
Vi
~
"
..,
~
o
~
0<
az
~<
'-"'z
o
8<
;~z
~
-
,
Go
~ 50
:;; ~
"
. u
-""
o D
" .
o 0.
~.E
" '0
,,"-=.2
<L> '" <.>
~ "2 VJ
~ ~ ~
o 0
~ i: c3
.
r' ~ ~
::= E"O
.:::..~ u
;!1 ~ -5
g'3 3
:t: .-
..,
;:
-=.g c<l
~ ~ ~
"
" Z
<L> U U
~ :=...;:
~ g ~
-B~
~~
C
~]
~~ag
"
u
o
..
>
.s
,;
"
..,
M
;;
"-
~
~~
~ 0
~ <E
2' ~
~ 0
u 0
5 sr
'Q g,
~ g
- ~
~~
c<l OJ
c ..,
o "
"
-~
"
-,
~
o
~
"
v.
"
~
",
v.
o
o
o
;;f
~
g
~.
i"',
~
"
"
..,
~
-
.
o
o
o.
~
;]
v
u
;;
v
;;
Cl
1
~
.,
~
>. ^
"
9 2
O~
'-' "
.~ .g
~~
,0;:0
~ ~
""
U
.
~
o
~
g
~
o
5:-
~
,..
~
6
p
Ii
:~
-<
!:ld
i u;?::
'"
i9 ~,
,..:< c<l
I] ~
i'-= ~
p
oen<0
~o~
;'-O-c-
N_
O .0
70<0
-;:"'-0
__r-,,-
fin <1l
':::roOl
~d~
~
iii
tn
'"
'"
..
'"
:>
'tl
I::
'"
...J
~
'E
=C:E
.. '"
::I ..
1::0::
";:; C:
I:: 0
3z
-~
NO
c';;
.. 0
j5:o::l
",!l
"'::1
"
;;
<.l
I "J
?
I ~:
"
:
, .
..
,,':
~ ~
..,'2
........ -; s..
:; -= u
~ '"
U
=1--
:;;
~I ''';l
=
=
=
..:
-
'C
..
~
<.l
~
~
~ ...
:0 0
=.a:;
~ ~ ~
-
",r
:>
~
.
;,
"5! .:.i
; -<
...J" z
S
'"
::l
'"
;::
'"
1:;
U
::l
...J
'"
t:
00
c 0
g .$
o u
~ g
-;i'
~ ~
u ~,
~~
a:;~
<E':;
~ u
. 0
5- c; I ~ _ :
~ !
2 =1"',;
'", '"
" "
~ :;;
:v '2
, u
<<l ~
~ 5
11,
1! r;,
5
"
v
51
,~ 0
~ ~
o
B il
v
u
~
c ~
N
o;~
o 0
~ 1)
1..0 ;:;
a ~
c ~
~ "
~ -:l
o C
~ .
'f; f'
~ ::;
o ?
~u
,1 ~
53
15 ~
I ~i ~
I ~12
on",
,- ~
N N
"'ll"?
I 21 ~
.~ i::
~ ~
. .
Il
o
"E':::!
~J1
t:.~ ~
'-=:=; ~
~ -
~ ~k;-: a
~ ~nl;';; ~
:;,; l':j ~
V:.(/) (.,-
1"
~.,- "<t"1""- 'T
....... """"""1;::);:1;:::-;
<A;;,. ~::;;;:;, VI VI""
I---
I---
-I
"
1
1
I'
22
~I
r,
c,
~
~
:;:
'"
,
v
~ '0
~2
~ ~
c 0
1:l iI
~ t
~ ~
o ~
c '0
2:';;:
c; '~
~., 0
;; ~
~ ~
o v
o
~-g
..2 "'
~
.- '2
g 0
~C
"0;; ~
U Q
e::: ':,.I
a a OJ .;:; ;:; a
~~~~~~
:=; _ E. 2 ~ .3
~;,~.ow'"'O)
~ ~~~~:g
o:l o:l "" '" o:l ~
fr g.g-fr f?
::; is 05 C ;:;
U~V:_!(-'U
-
=-
200052
"',1 ,..~ 1"1 <"'I ,..~ ('-I
::>0 00 00 = 00 00
UUVVU,-,
::;::l;=J::;:)__
~~-2d . d
~ ~ ~ ~ f1, ~
:::s ::l ::l ;::l ;::I :l
]]]]]]
~
o
"
j
;;
~
~~;:;;:;;:;;:;;:;~~~;:;;':;~~~
c::~;:;.;[;;!~~~~[;;!~~~::;;;~:;.:
n
~
~~~~~~~I::~~oooooo~~~~~~~~==
V,Vl~<AV\<AV\ <AV\~~~_~~V\<A<A~V\V\V\
~
~
~,
c-'
n
~
000 -0_0
8. g~ ~ ~ ^.~ ~I:,;,;
;.c-;co;c:;c:;c:;c- :cfi:
1',(,1('.1'-,1,.1(,_1("
\A V, \A Vl \A VlIA!i'i:
I..
'"
];.> ~
'~ 'Jl'i;;;
~gQ
~_C; ~
^ "
-:;:
~~
:r <"j
I ~ ~ F;'
",-,
'-
tJl 'E, ,,",
g-~
c. c;.-.
i
W
~Ju
0_
" ..
;ol.l.o
z ::0
- 13
~g~ 5
::; ~ :: g tl
U'~~~'~:]i
~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~_/, ~
~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - r:::
~:::;t;:c;:c;~__g_~
c.;;...-' -,or..:; 2: ~. :=
;-:1
~
:::c.::::::::> C ::::- 0 (-',~
''1'''1'''1'''1;-:::" .
i i i i
oo~__oo 000000
_oo,ooco OOQ_CC
;.;";.~ 22_ ;'2;-;-22-
~ ~, ~. v, ~, v, ~ ~ ~ 'n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'--1 "I <'1 '--1 '-.1 ....1 N ('I r-I ('_I 1"'1 N N N .....l
""''''''Vl\AVlV'l\A'''''IAVlVl\A<A\A\A
-;;
~
"!
~
E
I
c. ~
7 ~
- ,-,I '-'I
.:;,0 VJ X
'" '" '" ~ '" ~ '"
<r~~ tJl tJl~~ tJl~;~_~
:2 ~ ~
"
o=::2Q:=;
g. ~ 3. c; c;
- - --
tJl <Ji ;; r.r.
g. ~ ~
--~--'-=-
~
o
co
11 ~
@ .g
~I ~
, c
Vie
"'1"'1'"
oo-x:x
i i
;;];:jB;i
_ C", ....)
~ :>c'~,
"'I"
x xc
I
~
co
u
S! 5.
~I~
0";:;
2S
....1 ,-J
0000
~~
~ ~
];2
~3
@ ";;;
ti u
"''''
.2 .2
" U
:g~
g '"
g ~
'-'~
0000
'-11'_1
n ('j
~~
0000
(F);F}
30
~~
o' :::;,^
'r. ,r,
....1,_1
<AVl
'-
'" Vl
5:2
o. ~
s
~
~
c.. ~ ;:1
'" ~ @
,:3 [j":::
~ '
o ,
~ rJ,1l
?
~Vi
OJ ~ 3
"
~.~ ~
~ {: ~
~ :: ::;
E .::5.....
,
-
;s~,
?~
, - 2
16 ~
~~
!~ .g
=~
0-
v~
~
~
l
.~
5
!7.
-
~
"
"
IV
j:J.
,<
~
g;
3':"
:U ~.
3' ;5
~E
= v
r-I.:..
00)(")
f'-O~
-~~=
.0
.S"<T
~ 0
....J::.,.-
B~a>
-roOJ
-252~
c:
"
OJ
<(
"'
'"
"'
=>
."
c:
..
...J
'iij
'"'
c:
-'"
-c:5!
'" "'
::> '"
c:o::
:';::;C
c: 0
8z
-.
NO
6~
.. 0
:0..
...!!!
1-::>
<J
'iij
U
"
-
:;
.
.
u
i
.
...
~-
~:g
'3 .
",U
'"
-
'5
'"
.
U
.
;Q
=
~
~
""
=
=
...J
u
;;,
...J
'"
I-
...
~ ~
~ ~
('.1 ",1
V; f/)
-
Vl :r.
g X
~ o.
o
~
"
'"
^
"
~
i
8
;;:
o
o
~
]
a
'"
"
"
o
g
11.
~
~
M
~
'~
o
o
o
~ ~
%t'O
~ ~
[; ~
~ 5:
^ <
~ t'
.~ ti
WJet
"
~
^~
~ "
5..:::
2 ~
0. "
^~
" "
o .
8 ~
o
o
~
~
.
~
'0
'"
"
.
o "
;r~ ~^
1-<o:g~
'& u -'= ,,~
g,.gr:::."1
N-:.:.J
EFt~~
'-;,;:: ~
" ~
-a ~ ~
~ .13 ~
~..o ~,
e 01
~ .9 ~
::: ;a c:
~ ,~ -,~-"
! .~
LlJ~
~
~
~
~
~,
'n
~
~,
~
o
c
o.
e
,
~'
~
~
n.
;;
.
"
-5
"
~ ::;
,.:.[
.~ :3 "1;l
~ ~g
B ~ ~
13'jg ~
.2 e <':l
" " .
o.~
"~ -
8 ~ ]
~ 1@ ~
:;l :: <1)
o:l '[j
~ ,~ ~
" .
c ~ ~
;;, ;:l _
,.g ;r ~
- " .
.-:;;: g,'O
~.:::>-=
,-",r-
~ ~ p..l
e'Oc';;j
:J <1) 3 00
r-o:i":j"1
~ ~ ~.8
:l: <1)a:J o:l
;:;
~
.:::>
"
M
'"
~
"
~
;;
5
.
,
i:
~'
"
o
M
~
"
~
g 2
~ "
" 1:-
201:
~~
~ 0
~~
" '0
[u
~ 0
&!.-=
~g
g ~
Oi ~
;.. .;;
~.E 1A
o:l 0 .2
~ g o:l
oj '';:; ~
o . Cl
: 2 '"
<1) ~.~
~ .~ .~
U3~<
~,
~
"
;r;
'"
~
,
ii
"
.
5
~
"
x
~
o
"
Vi
"
g
5
:g
"
;'
~
~
~
'C,
5
~
"
~
~
'"
:5
~,
.E
f-
o
5
o
u
X
~
c;
~
-
;r
~
~
:ij
"
~ :s
o .
" "
" 0
0-
o ~
o. i;j .:::
'i; ~.g
= .<;;
~.g 8-
.S .~ <:.>
E. :::..2
E ;:; v
~ 2 :::..
~~]
c ~ ~
o 0
":j ;l:: iI
~ 2
. M
~~OO
Vl ~ .~
" ~
o 0
~ s ~
c ~-'=
:~ g .~
:') ~
:::..c,....;
"
tf,li'C
"
~
M
};
"
~
'n
'"'
~
"
M
^
~
:.> ..;
o 0
~2
.8 ~
o .
'" 0
" "
;; "
o
"'~
.s~
"
" u
g.@
'" ;..
~ o:l
00
00
-
~
~
en
n!
~
~
,
.
~
~
~
"
-So
1
:;
~
:ij
"
~
:;
};
"
~
~
'"'
~
"
M
"
oS
" ~.
0000
UU
:0:0
~::::.
~
u _
n. ~ 1;1;
~2 ;::I :::I
.8 e -g "g
~ g ~ ~
.;;
"
x
^
u
"
.g 1= 1=
WJ o:l 2 8
M
~
000000
~51~
"
~
'-DC/;' 00
EFt;;; EFt
'C,
6d
".1
"
~
c:=' c
",co
N :::>~ o.
'0 ~
;;;:; '" 'n
(A N ,,~
~ ~
~.
.
~ ^
o
,~
C
~
"
i'
~ 0
5. ~
.2
"
us
"
"
Sj
:3
~~
~ ~ rJ
. "
,~- ~ ~
13 <
~ ~ Q
'-..'.. C :::
U :5 ::;
tr.<C"':
~
~
~
:;i
1>-,:>,
I ~ "='
, :; .2
I 0 ~
v.
" -
:::S -&
0:0
~ ~
~
u
.
o
.s
.~
"
o
~
"
~
~
I"
:i
I~
,<
I~ ~
I ~:5
9~
I u ,
:;: :l
,-g ~
!:.=~
O(DC")
,,-0"-
:'-0..-
N_
O - 0
Z Cl L.')
~ ~O
c: J::.-
22(1)
-ro'"
~2d::
c
Q)
'"
<{
'"
"
'"
~
'C
C
.. ~
...J -
. '6
~ ~ ~
'E -- ;; ~
'6 '5 u
-" ~ ....
"C~ ~
" '" u
~ "
co: ~
~c ;;
00 ~ =
"Z ~
-~
NO -<:
C~
" 0
:C+:l
...!!l ~ ...
.... ~ :;; =
" ~ :~
;;; =
O"l': =
u ~-::~
-
'5
"
U
-
:!i' 'a
~ ;:>
~
~
;:> ~
'C -;Z,
=
= ]
...J
;; :Ij
'"
....
en d
i2 G
~ j
U
;;, ~
...J
'"
t::
" "
" "
, ,
g g
0 "
c. c.
~ ~
~ ~
;;; ;;;
;; ;;
~ -;]
"
;; ;;
"~ S
" ~
" "
" "
" "
, ,
t "
, ~
"
] "
" "
, ,
"~ ~
'- a
0
" "
, ,
~ ..
>
-" <5 .
-2 f' -
, "
~ ~
~ ~
"
'.F
~
" ",
~ ~
~ ~
" '-
-
-.
~
.
..
"
~
"
-5
If;'.s
::5 ;;
O~
:W II>
I'U
W"
I ~
, "
c.
~
-5
"
.
"
o
~
o
~
-;;
3
-5
2
-;;
"
"
o
~
"
~
@
"
"
e
3
"
"
~
;2;
~
~
OJ g
~.. -
:\
~~
-"'-:::
~~
H
~ @ --
";::: U 2
L~:g
}~.~'
In
~
c.
>
1) ~ ~ ~,
'g 'lJ ~ 'r,
:;:"::::-:::<'1
;I'~ ~ ~
.l." "';:::
" i::.c ,.;
;: :g 5 ""B
] ~ ~
S::C f::
''1'' -;;
o
I~
u
I-~
I"
I~
I'"
,::'9::;
i~~
" 0
~.E
i- lJ
;c- ~
Agenda item No. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 106 of 113
APPENDIX E
Single Family Tiering Analysis
,1;genda Item No. 17D
March 10, 2009
Page '107 of 113
TOA has included an update to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family
residential (detached) land use 10 ensure eqllity by size of home. To facilitate this, an
analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between hOllsing unit size and
hOllsehold travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from tbe 2001 National Household
Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2005 American Housing Survey (ABS) to examine the
overall trip-making characteristics ofhollseholds in the Uniled States.
Table E-l presents t1le existing trip characteristics being utilized in the CllITent adopted
impact fee schedule for the Single Family (Detached) sllbcategory. The 2001 NHTS
database was used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for
various annual hOllsehold income levels. In addition, the 2005 AHS database was lIsed to
compare median annual family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important
to reCOb'11ize that the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed
simply to provide a convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the
NHTS and honsing lInit size from the AHS.
The reslllts of the analyses of these two sources are included in Tables E-2 and E-3. First.
the data shown in Table E-2 indicate that the median income in the U.S. for families/
households living in housing units smaller than 1,500 square feet in size ($34.579) is
significantly lower than even the overall median income for the U.S. ($49,702). Then. in
Table E-3. annual average household VMT was calculated from the NHTS database for a
number of different income levels and ranges related to the resulting AHS income data in
Table E-2.
In order to calculate a corresponding trip rate for these new tiers. however. it was necessary
to rely on comparative ratios. As an example. consider t1le $34,579 annllal income
category. First. it was determined that the average annual hOllsehold VMT for the income
level of the $34.579 is 20,976 miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average
annual VMT per household in the U.S.. normalized to the median-of~$57.167 (28,541
miles) category to derive a ratio of 0.735. Next, this ratio was applied to the daily YMT for
the average single family (Detached) housing unit size (i.e.. 1.500 to 2.499 s.f.) to generate
a daily YMT 01'33.63 f()r the ncw tier, as shown in Table EA. This daily VMT lib'llre was
then divided by thc proposed assessahle nip lenb1h of 5.88 miles to obtain a typical trip rale
of 5.72 trips per day.
Then, this trip rate \vas placed in the impact fee schedule to generate a net impact fee value
for one of the new single family tiers.
Tin(hlle-Oliver & .1,.;;,ociates_ Ine_
r ebruary 2009
Co1!ier County
rransportation Impact Fee Update Study
[-1
Agenda Item No. 17D
March 10, 2009
Page 108 of 113
Table E-5 illllstrates the impact that the incorporation of the tiers for the Single Family
(Detached) land lIse has on the County's ca1clllated impact fee schedllle. As shown in the
table, the net impact fee for a housing unit of1ess than 1.500 sqllare feet is $7,652.
Table E-1
Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics (1)
CwculatedValues Excluding Assessable Trip Daily Ratio to
Trip Rate :'" """"';
· ,i: 'Tiering' - Length ' VMT Mean
Single Family (Detached) 7.n 5.88 45,75 1 .00
(1) Source: Appendix F. Table F-I
Table E-2
AHS Median Income Data by Housing Size (1)
2005 AHSMedian Income Data Annual
" ,.', " ' Income
by Housing Size
Less than 1.500 sf $34.579
1.500 to 2,499 sf $57.050
2,500 sf or more $80,889
Average of All HOllses $49.702
(I) Source: 2005 American Household Survey
Table E-3
NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category (1)
2001r<HTSTr~,,~1 D~ta by Annual " Days " Daily> Ratio to Normalized
Annual HH Income VMTIHH VMT Mean' to 1.128
Median of$34,579 20.976 365 57.47 0.829 0.735
Total (All Homes) 25.294 365 69,30 1.000
Median of$57,167 28.541 365 78,19 1.128 1.000
Median of$80,889 32.285 365 88.45 ] .276 1.131
(1) Source: 2001 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
Februmy 2009
E-2
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
Agerda !tem No. 17D
March 10,2009
Page -:09 of 113
Table E-4
Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier
, " Assessable ,
Estimation of Trip Rate Trip Rate,l) Trip Daily Ratio to,
, ByTi~r ." VMT(3) Mean(4)
" " ,'. I: Lenl!th(2) c:
Single Family (Detached)
Less than , ,500 sf 5.72 5.88 33.63 0.735
1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.78 5.88 45.75 1.000
2,500 sf or larger 8.80 5.88 51.74 1.131
(I) Daily VMT (ltem 3) divided by assessable trip length (ltem 2) for each tiered
single family land use category
(2) Source: Table E-I
(3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by total daily VMT for the 1.500 to 2,499 sf
tier for each tiered single family land use category
(4) Source: Table E-3
Table E-5
Net Impact Fee by Single Family Land Use Tier(1)
Impact of Tiering on Trip Rate Assessable Daily Net Fee(1)
Fee Schedule Trip Length VMT
Single Family (Detached)
Less than 1.500 sf 5.72 5.88 33.63 $7,652
1.500 to 2,499 sf 7.78 5.88 45.75 $10.372
2.500 sf or larger 8.80 5.88 51.74 $11.559
(I) Source: Appendix F. Table F-I
-
Tindale-Oliver &. A"<';ClCi8tC, Inc
February 2009
E-3
Collier County
Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
APPENDIX F
Calculated Collier County Transportation
Impact Fee Schedule
Agenda Item No. 170
March 10, 2009
Page 110 of 113
o 0)('")
J'-.D~
~D~
N_
O _0
Z~.--
~ ~
".c~
$2Q.l
-roo>
~26::
"
Q)
0>
<.i:
..
:;
'C
..
.c
"
l/l
..
..
U-
ti
'"
c.
.5
"
o
~
~t::
LL&.
.. UI
:0"
'" '"
...,::
>.
c:
::l
o
<.l
~
'0
<.l
'C
.Sl
'"
:;
"
..
<.l
,0 N
.
~':2
~~
, 0
~8
"
<
g
~
'I
lJ!
III
'e.
<.~
!~v
o
b
,
.i
. ,
...
~~
'--
tl.:,
f~
i
~
....
OJ, ;z; ~
i":
1.
t
.,
..
i
z
~
E ~~, .~
~ R ...
~ ~ ~ 1
<::':5"8 'it
~,u.~_
iij- ~
u '"
~ -~'
1
!
~
.\
.
.
..
I--
~i.
i.\
...
I--
."
-~
': !.\
'" ~ ;.@'
~
g ~
tiE;
Jd
~.]
'--
~
.
.
..
f--
,
'--
~ ~
[fl:,
.9~
1; ~.
~'FJ
R1' :!l
::::
I
I
~
.
z
~
~
-"
.u
!::~
~
.
u
,
..' ii
. ,
aU
..
, ..
~;s
1
~
i
.
.
..
i
o
.\
I
~I
E
e
~
l'
~
. ,I
"I ~'
, ~I; : j
~ IiI 11 Ji
c .,1, 1 ' ~I
~I "1- 'I <I "I
~ ~j~ ~ ~
i:I N " c:1 "I i:
,"-:
~
o
~
^
"
-
0,
"
-
;)
^
~I
~ '"
"
"
"
<
7
<
L
z
@
~
":~I '
~ ~
~
j
c
"
-.
::[ ;
,
:01
i
,
c
C
"'!
€;::f jj
:"'oJ;
vi :;:-
~ ~ ~I
"
"
"
x
"
I ,I
,
-,
~
o
.'
<
.
,
,
z
@
,
"
"
"
"
"
:j,
~
5'
,
7
~
"
~
,"'ji
c
1;
~
"
:;;
~
o
eX
"
,
<
o
::;
~
-I -
<
~I '
,
;:,"
,
~I
eX
,
"
~:
=
"
"
<
z
~I ; ;1 ;
I I
~
o
~
~
~
,
,
"
"
:;:-
~
:/'
=
,
=
,'ji
,,:,
"I "
;>C
<
,I <
'j
I
- ,
!
Ii
"
, I
il I: I
"
-
::. -, ':
_I -: ,I -
I
I)
!!i,
';,ili ! ]
Co. E r '"
!I~ 'I
:r:1 [; of
'I ~"
;,~ 3i
~
o
^
o
^
c
~
,
,
;;:
c
z
3
o
::-11
c
,
0;
"
~I~
, Q
, 0
<c
,I
~'I
~I
-_,I ji
"
;:" ;;:
o
o
o
^
~
,
~
<
=
.
,
l
"
~
c
,
L
3,
I
~I <
=
q
.
,
~
~
:;
~
jO
,
,
,
"
;
:j,
~
o
,
:;:;
,
~
"
,
,
"
"
-
,
,
"
;,;
2
:5
-"
~ u
0,,"
:;;.0::
:::'
,
~
~
~
i'
w
=
"
N
I
~I I
::: ~
=
~
~
eX
of
of
,
I
=
;:t,
j
~
"
eX
~
-
:;
c
,
I
=
,
c
o
,
"
~
,
,
}:
;::
2
~
};,
c
c
.i1
:I
:2
"
"
/~
~
<
~
,
~
o
,
o
ii
~
~
~
i<
,
1
~
>
~
~
"
~
o
^ ~
~ j
x
~ ~
~
~
"
,
~
'"
"
x
~
o
" "
~ ~
1; 1l
.@ E
~ ~ ~ B'
~ I~ c
-z z
,
Jj
,~
"
"
^
,
~
,
,
'"
]
=
,
'"
i
~ i ~
- ~_I
,
'~7. ~
~Ig 'I II
:: f ;1
:z~
z 81::)1
~ I
,
,I
^
;",;>"
"~
33
Q~
,~~
= ~
8:J
~
~
1l
J
8:
<
^
.2
.
"
o
~
;
"
o
o
i
^
c
"
J
,
~
31
~
c
C
L
~
>
g
o
"
,
g
~
~'
"
,
<
I
I:
,
i I~
OJ
~~
-N
j ~.
~ :::
""15
::: '-'
-~
00'>0')
c-o~
~...c-~=
, 0
;:'N
~ ~
~~~
$2 Q)
-ro'"
~2:~
~
iii
'"
<l:
t
~
.
"
!:';;!
...
tJ!e,
.
h
.
ill",
I--
~!,
j~..u
..
:;
't:l
..
.c
o
Vl
..
..
LL
ti
..
Co
E
,,~
~ .2
<:1;l
;:;t:::
<: 0
o Co
~~
"7~
LL>-
$>-
~'E
>- is
u
~
~
'0
u
't:l
$
..
:;
o
'"
U
U
I--
. .
...
!~
r--
tI'",
f!
..9
"",:'.<
~
,
i
,
.~
..
-
.g.~
'iJ
...
-
U
~t
-,-
,
:
o
.,
..
-
-
~~
':"
~
.
;;
~
.
i
.,
o
0;
0,
;:;; :;; ...
o
,
1l
~
Jj
u
i
"
1l
~~
~~
,
u
i
"
,c;
c
!
~ ~. ~-~. ,;.
:;;;::; :-,
3 ,~
:;f :: ., ;;;;
~
,
;
1l
ji
u
~
N
5
u
,
-.
,
~ i
.:;: ;;:
~ '"
,:: B ,-::
~ ~ -
':! '"
,
i
~
~
,
,
I
u
.
M
~
,
;;;;
.
"
~
<
z
0;
,
~
~
"
,
"
,
3l
"
,
-
=
] I~
jj
~ i
~
c;
MM! ,1 51 '
j!i~ W ~ ei 81 ~
~
0;
o
,
,
"
u
"
U
Z
,
,
J,
z
~
c
u
i
~ ;::;
^ ;
,
~ ~
,
]
~
3
~
~
g. ]
~
~
,
,
"
u
z
j
u
"
u
z
,
j
-
c,
,
;.
~ ~
3 Vi
i"'1 ~I -
z~: ~ ~
~ ~I 81 ~
"'Ie,
,
B: ~ 3: ~ ~
<.
~
,
~
u
u
Z
,
,
"
u
z
o
"
,
~
c
u
-
,
c
~ c,
;;; ;:;; '" ..,
5i
"
,;
~
u
u
2
~
:;;
u
"
z
~
"
c
u
-
"
=
oj " 0[ ~ a
~
"
u
u
,
~
i7
"
.~
z
sl '
=
,
c
~ -" ~I
=
,
c,
c
~
~
"
~
"
u
Z
,
,
if,
u
Z
-
,
z
i!-
,
,
,
c,
6
~
o
,
,
]
u
"
u
i
]
~
"
U
/C.
~
a- ~
'" Vi
,
"
,
z
~
5
6
"\i
8
,
. ~
_ 0;
c.
,
~ ~
=
"
,
~
u
u
Z
j
"
u
z
g.
6
]
:S
~ ::!
~
-
~
.
0;
"
~ & 0: ~ ~ ~ ~
"
]
~
u
u
Z
j
"
u
Z
.
^
~
"
:5.
-
~ I q
! a\ ~ '
_:iH u, ~
- I =
- -- --
:!
I
~ &1 ~ ~ ~
"I -
~i =
\
~ ~
I
~ ;1 -
,
,
'0
1
u
z
^
'"
,
,
"
2 ;;; J:
\
u
"
J
~I ~
i
-;
~
"
z
,
$1
" ,
~ ~
~
]
;" ? ~
~I ~
~\ ~
~I g
,
"
~
~ :;;'i 2
\
u
u
!
!I ~
=
"
,
~ "
z ~
~I =
~
~ ?
~-
"
=
"
1
u
"
"
"
~
.
::5.
~ ~ V>
~
"
\
u
,
o
u
,
"
d
~
f
"
"
oc
;0
g.
~ ~ ~
g. ~.
'.
~ ~ ~
~
"
"i.
\
u
u
~ ~
'--' c
01 oc
:1 oc
"'
,
c
u
-
,
"
,
'9
R
,
.;
.
"'i
~
~
~
:;;
~
~
"
~
\
o
\
v
u
~
o
~
.;
-
"
"
"
g
~
3- ~
,=: u;
c
u
M
".
~
,
"
]
,
~ ~
,
"
~
~
~ ;::
Ie ~
,,~
:5.3
O~
u 0
::,~ ~
!:og5
u 8
:j
u
o
~
.s
~
~
"
~
"
,
;0
,
l
u
i
JO
N
C.
J:
I
I
i
1-'
,
I-~
i~
.::
"
;:;9:'
.;;:. 0
';N
~~
" 0
~ "
~f
c
z
o OW)
r--O~
~O~
N_
O - 0
Z~C'0
- ~
--~
2~Cll
-mo>
~2~
c
Q)
0>
<i
.
a
.
i!i
au
--
h
_0
:E':~'
"iE"
!I~
~~U
-
'1-
~~
..
:;
"
"
.c
"
1Il
"
"
u.
tl
'"
c.
E
:c~
~ .~
<::1;;
~t::
<:: 0
o C.
,:o<n
~~
u.,=
2>-
.gc
I- is
(j
~
~
'0
u
"
"
1;;
:;
"
<0
(j
l\
r-r
.
I,~'
;:
~
~
.
"
.
~
~
!
~
.
~
;.
;:
f-
~f.
B
l-< ~.
-i-
n
.
-
~
.
'0
.
f-
.,
,
f-
I
, .:;l
~I. ~
.u
=~
. ,
..
~~
.
!g
!"r
!
~
.
~
o
'0
.
.
.
.i
,
%
o
"
~
;;
g,
~
"
u
,
,
~
c
,
J
o
~
-.
Co
"
<,l "'!
~:~~~
- - -
'" ~ '" '5 '"
'" 0;;
::: ;::-
c
"
"
~
"
~
~
~
,
~
~
,
~ ii ~
~~I5~
'~ ;q ~,
z u
2. ,.7.
,~
,
,I
I
"
"
,
~
~
113 j
('-" ::::
~~c=E~
""~~:::lM
u
7 ~ ~
c
;!:
"
"
~
.'
.
<
,.
"
]
1
!
~
"
o
3
,
U
j
g
j
B
II
~
,
~.:
~ ~
~
"
~
"
~
~
~
~
~
~
?
oi
,
,
;;
"
"
Co
"
"
j~]
~i~ ~
::i
g.
~
* i
P..""
~Ij ;
lli ,I ~I ~I
" ,- "I
E ~,~ '~ ""
~ if !si'
,
"
~
"
~
o
~
1:)"-
'~ ~
.r. t:i!1
,.J'i'i"E
"'-g;S5
,.
7. 5
u
~ ]
bi ] ~
it~
~
;;
o
~
<
:J'.
<
Z
"
-
:(
;,
~I' ,
:::l ~
7,
~I
5
.
~ "'!
~ ~ ~
if.
~,]
irr;
I
~Iil '
~
~
~
"
"
U
o
,
~
~
o
~,
~dl
~ ;:1 '
J
Z
-
Z
'"
j
~
~
co
~
~
c
,
"
"
~
:;.i
"
,
~
"
,
"
^
:1
,:1
"
"I
3'
~
"
,
~
,
'j
"
~
,
~ ~ j-
'P ,
'" ~~~,
i..7. w
I Z
:
,
~
~
u
c
z
z
o
,.
~I
1
~
"
'I"
g!~ ~]
'I' O.^ -
~~~i~
~] j'l" "
7'~ g ;,;
:::: ~ z.
-
-
;'
c
-
"
<
J
,
"
,i
1
~
jj
,
~dl: jj
= ~I
~,
c
,
~i i
,I ;
r: ~
;; =.1
-I
11;! I
E ~I !I ~
i 011 , '~.I ~I
~ ~J .: 'G '~
~I ~I ! ~I i
;t.
~
~
...
~.
~
~
,
-
"
c
"
~
:i
~
o
,
,
<E
c
1
"
...
:::
=
"
"
e
j
"
,~
z
,
,
,
~
u
=
,
,
~
~
7
5
3
,0
.
o
"
~
,
jl
~
8
~.
-
~
-
"
~
"
;
c
3
,
,
~
;;
~
,
-
,
~
.
:5
~
it;
]
-
"
,
;;
'"
o
.
~ ~
~ ~ ~ i I
~ 5 ~ ~
eo~---"
z
[
o
E
':.J
gf
is.
~
~
ryj
o
;;
2
o
"
~
~
3
7
~
7
8
o
;;
~
~
~
g-
..
E
;;
:;;
"
..,
.
...,
^
"
~
~
:;
~
o
.
3
o
;;
o
'"
,
E
.
o
;;
;;
o
~
~
;
.
o
o
"
'v
o
~
2
o
~ 'tJ
~ oj.;:i
~ =:
"" G
O)~
;::::g~
u '" ..
=11'0
~ ~-'S
j ~ ~
35
, "
~ li
~~~ j~
=2: :...,..
- -5 a
~;? ^ ~
~ 'i:' .c-::;
.Q -' 0 =._"_ =00
] ~ ~
31 ;,':= g.~
-' 5 g "-
~~ i ~
;:: ::l ~
0.."3' c '-'
~_~ ]2
~ B 'G ~ ~
- '" '-
8-; ~-g
~ 2 p. co 8.
~ 'iJ '=' R ~
;; ~;<i .:::: ;j
'" ~ 0;:; -5
~: ~ l~ ~
g ~c..g-a~ ]
~~~i~.~ v
'" ,... ~ - :Jj 0 8
~~~ ~.~ ~'
:> * ;:: ~ -5 ~
~H~u ]
UH] ~
~ "0 "'
- 5' g,~ co -e -2
HHj I
~ i.1 ~~ ~
'" '" ~'C co 2
]]~~;fi
~ ~ZJ~~~U
-= r'....' :s
,~
~
Bi
.; g
5 0
= 0
~~
~t-'
~:3
-::l"ii
3'~
~ ~
> a
"'"
~~
: .~
3c.
~ ~
~ g
.< ~
"
~
=
3
,
.I
,-
...
'3
,
~
-t-
i
z
I~'q
I'~ ~
" ...
.l:: ~
!~5
'u ~
~
~
3-
.5
.g
~
~
?-
>=
""
~
o
o
~
"
o
~
,
1
,
1
10
1.5
:ii
~
,~
1<
I"
I OJ ~
1 0 ~
3':'
'C
1.2:: co
,,," ;:l
'I] ~
...